rae: a “ ’ 4 . rs . = 4 a / . - F . a 7 _ - - ‘ . , i » y * 5 ahd ei Au ® us eas een tae are ; : a 7 7 sits =, ‘ae = ; 1 a _w tee 4 — os = A ey > - i ial . - ss oo nas leis i THE LONDON ano EDINBURGH PHILOSOPHICAL MAGAZINE AND JOURNAL OF SCIENCE. CONDUCTED BY SIR DAVID BREWSTER, K.H.LL.D.F.R.S. L. & E. &e. RICHARD TAYLOR, F.L.S.G.S. Astr.S. Nat.H. Mose. &c. AND RICHARD PHILLIPS, F.R.S. L. &E. F.G.S, &c. “Nec aranearum sane textus ideo melior quia ex se fila gignunt, nec noster vilior quia ex alienis libamus ut apes.” Just. Lies. Monit. Polit. lib. i. cap. 1. VOL" Vint, NEW AND UNITED SERIES OF THE PHILOSOPHICAL MAGAZINE, ANNALS OF PHILOSOPHY, AND JOURNAL OF SCIENCE. JANUARY—JUNE, 1836. LONDON: PRINTED BY RICHARD TAYLOR, RED LION COURT, FLEET STREET, Printer to the University of London. SOLD BY LONGMAN, REES, ORME, BROWN, GREEN, AND LONGMAN; CADELL} BALDWIN AND CRADOCK; SHERWOOD, GILBERT, AND PIPER 5 SIMPKIN AND MARSHALL; WHITTAKER AND CO.; AND S, HIGHLEY, LONDON: -—— BY THOMAS CLARK, AND ADAM AND CHARLES BLACK, EDINBURGH; SMITH AND SON, GLASGOW , HODGES AND M’ ARTHUR, DUB- LIN; AND G. W.M, REYNOLDS, PARIS. Tue Conductors of the London and Edinburgh Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science beg to acknowledge the editorial assistance ren- dered them in the publication of the present volume by their friend Mr. Epwarp Wim Bray ey, F.L.S., F.G.S., Librarian to the London In- stitution. June 1st, 1836. Vos cs Ee 1 Pon A CONTENTS. NUMBER XLIII.—JANUARY, 1836. Page Mr. T. W. Jones on the Retina and Pigment of the Eye of the Common Calamary (Sepia Loligo) .... 1... -2c eee ee even Rev. W. Buckland’s Notice on the Fossil Beaks of four extinct Species of Fishes, referrible to the Genus Chimera, that oc- cur in the Oolitic and Cretaceous Formations of England . . Mr. J. Tovey on the Relation between the Velocity and Length of a Wave, in the Undulatory Theory of Light .......... Dr. J. Inglis’s Extracts from a Prize Essay on Iodine........ Mr. W. J. Henwood’s Observations on the Steam Engines of Cornwall; in reply to John Taylor, Esq..........+.....- Dr. H. Hudson on an Error in Dr. Apjohn’s Formula for in- ferring the Specific Heat of Dry Gases ..............4- Rev. Baden Powell’s Remarks on a Paper on the Transmission of Calorific Rays, &c. by M. Melloni, in the Phil. Mag. and dournal or Science, INOZ42.)... cries cate sees ee herinets Rev. Baden Powell’s further Observations on M. Cauchy’s Theory of the Dispersion of Light ..........--..-..+-. Mr. C. B. Rose’s Sketch of the Geology of West Norfolk . 7 12 20 2) “ 23 24. 28 Mr. W.G. Horner on the Theory of Congeneric Surd Equations 43 Rev. D. Lardner’s Letter to Peter Barlow, Esq., respecting some parts of his Reports addressed to the Directors and Proprietors of the London and Birmingham Railway Com- YE Pfennig hts orf -asg- eee cee tae Nok: wie itn sia ate ta er. W. Ritchie’s Remarks on. a supposed new Law of Mag- MeiC ACHON ...... 4. ~ cdg ete meen tonss: o” Br] peLaeesl t= Dr. Marshall Hall’s Deseliption of a Thermometer for deter- mining minute Differences of Temperature.............. Official Report of the Proceedings of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, at the Dublin Meeting, PASE LOD 0x0 c, 2 = wince Apheieeteel teil a dati ly wise cece aie Proceedings of the Geological Society sle'«!+ 6 pimeria sive ce fae —E Lannean SOclety 222. <2) 34 pietaes icin ite —__—_—___——- Cambridge Philosophical Society ...... Mr. J. D. Smith on the Analysis of German Silver, and the Se- paration of Zinc from Nickel, &c..... 2.2... pid aee ens Action of Mushrooms on Atmospheric Air................ mipeciva,.anew Compound ......--. Berzelius on the Properties of Tellurium.................. Action of Oxacids on gale ia Apart NirBte of Gana drogen : F Seicpfiiic Boukipnnts catch. ods orto ilaaerne. Meteorological Observations for November 1835 . ‘ : Meteorological Observations made at the Apartments of the Royal Society by the Assistant Secretary; by Mr. Thomp- son at the Garden of the Horticultural Society at Chiswick, neer London; and by Mr. Veall at Boston a2 iv "CONTENTS. NUMBER XLV.—FEBRUARY. Page Rev. J. Challis on Capillary Attraction and the Molecular Forces of Fluids. 1)... 2200 oe sateen 0 t's ee tates te 89 Letter from Peter Barlow, Esq. to the Rev. D, Lardner, on the Theory of Gradients in Railways...........-++++++-++- 97 Mr. H. J. Brooke on Symbolic Notation, as applied to Minera- Bid py a kent io ie 0 on teen ee me omens 101 Mr. J. MacCullagh on the Laws of Reflexion from crystallized Surfacestsy ee eae scone tation, © srettiew ig? occ ne 103 Mr. R. W. Fox’s further Remarks on the Magnetic Forces.. 108 Dr. H. Hudson’s Remarks on M. Melloni’s and Prof. Powell’s Papers on the Transmission of Calorific Rays inserted in Lond. and Edinb. Phil. Mag. for December 1835 and Ja- MBP YB SGS ooo 55 ni Scie eee ot se oe ah = Snel tee ye | ae 109 Rey. Baden Powell on the Theory of Dispersion .......... 112 Mr. Faraday’s Experimental Researches in Electricity. Tenth Sth Ce ys pee a bee eine ener eet cnr ic Radice 114 Mr. T. T. Grant’s Experiments on the Protection of Iron from the Action of Salt Water ...... 2.2.2... eee e ee ee eee es 128 Mr. E. Solly on the Conducting Power of Iodine, Bromine, BUNT CMOMING LOFPRICCETICIEY 0. wo. since els che ine seep 130 Mr. W. Sturgeon’s Description of the Aurora Borealis of No- WERDER BG, PAGO. a cn te c'eysciee sory mat ce sm ce ee sin tel 134 Mr. John Taylor on the History of Rotatory Single Steam Engines working expansively; in reply to Mr. Henwood.. 136 Mr. S. Woodward on the Crag Formation; in answer to Mr. Chiarlesworth's Heply.. 22 eo citar Seavey eo 3m aye ep ected 138 New Books :—Prof. Wheweli’s Remarks on an Article in the Quarterly Review on Newton and Flamsteed............ 139 Proceedings of the Royal Society ( Anniversary, Nov.30, 1835) 147 — Geological Society .............2+.... 156 Ss Zoological Society. ..:.\ jy t.icade eae see 161 An Cical x periment +. s/o a fees pain 2) che olay pote she, os ee 168 MME ANG POEROONCe 5 Pickler Lye oe nice ohooh’ Lekota) afoteere fe 169 On the Mirage, as seen in Cornwall.............5....0006 169 Subsidiary Hypothesis to the Electro-chemical Theory of Sir RITE DUE VEIN. S verate Renee setae inte ceric pieehgnme ret 170 Note on Mr. Challis’s Paper on Capillary Attraction ........ 172 i. Dreithaubts Mineralogy. 2200. ccc cin cre ae cece od ome 173 Pralleyis MEUMIEb ihn. act ce wile, Pepe nls kecfesit vite ster See 173 Dr. Thomson on Sesquisulphate of Manganese ............ 173 M. F. Wohler on Crystallized Oxide of Chromium ........ 175 VOW SSCIENEINC TIQUMB eben. o's'aoivuselsin sc a! > snes atauateletatn 2 175 CONTENTS. v NUMBER XLVI—MARCH. Page Mr. Faraday on the general Magnetic Relations and Characters Cathe Metals ear eee es. d lorck eae aie eo ckcetoete 177 Mr. Woodbine Parish on the Effects of the Earthquake Waves emtne Cossiar tie Pactie.. 34. <4. - « s «paaee ms cape. 181 Rev. B. Powell’s Note on the Transmission of Radiant Heat.. 186 Mr. J. Atkinson on Sir G. S. Mackenzie’s Remarks on certain Points in Meteorology, &c., inserted in Lond. and Edinb. fie wiag, tor November 1835.2... 6... - g++ se cacle se = 187 Mr. H. F. Talbot on the repulsive Power of Heat .......... 189 Dr. J. Inglis’s Extracts from a Prize Essay on Iodine........ 191 Sir D. Brewster on the Anatomical and Optical Structure of the Crystalline Lenses of Animals, particularly that ofthe Cod 193 Prof. R. Wagner’s Observations on the Compound Eyes of In- SOC Bogakaoaec ends Ob SU nn DOP CODE boE bo t> Fo Obdeor 202 Rev. Baden Powell on the Formula for the Dispersion of Light derived from M. Cauchy’s Theory .::....5....5....2.% 204: Rev. W. Whewell’s Remarks on a Note on a Pamphlet entitled « Newton and Flamsteed” in No. CX. of the Quarterly Re- TAT ORTe i Rl pe) He deeb MN stash aes St aan easel at aes Cie clan hares J 11 Prof. S. P. Rigaud’s Observations on a Note respecting Mr. Whewell, which is appended to No. CX. of the Quarterly RBC ee AEA East Che SEL DE © soca v5 4) aserage ee oie oe 218 On Whiston, Halley, and the Quarterly Reviewer of the “ Ac- faq OLE AIGPLEC OL Fel Bare ee es oN ote Be orcteie 225 Mr. W. Hopkins’s Abstract of a Memoir on Physical Geology; with a further Exposition of certain Points connected with “TENSE Pel aA? NA ROR caine en sh Pe a 227 Rev. Dr. Robinson on the Aurora of November 18th, 1835.. 236 Mr. W. H. Barlow’s Account of Experiments made at Con- stantinople on Drummond’s Light, for the purpose of Light- house I]lumination in the Black Sea.................... 238 Rev. W. Ritchie’s Additional Remarks on the Law of Mag- netic Attractions and Repulsions..................--.. 242 Mr. W. S. Woolhouse on the Theory of Gradients on Railways 243 Prof. Forbes’s Noter especting the Undulatory Theory of Heat, and on the Circular Polarization of Heat by Total Reflexion 246 Dr. Daubeny’s Reply to some Remarks contained in Dr. John Divewe, Lue of pit TF, Davy te ee olen teb ie vcs dare oe 249 Proceedings of the Linnzean Society ...............-000- 255 ——_ Gibraltar Scientific Society —New Obser- Watery at aims ar Baths sie Seno a. soy eine de bee 256 M. Mitscherlich on Nitro-benzide and Sulpho-benzide ...... 257 M. Mitscherlich on the Formation of Aither.............. 258 Mr. J. D. Smith on the Separation of Barytes and Strontia .. 259 Mr. J. D. Smith on the Composition of Carbonate of Zinc.... 261 Prof. Del Rio on Riolite, a supposed Biseleniuret of Zinc, and Herrerite, supposed to be Carbonate of Tellurium,....... 261 Meteorological Observations ...00 000. J Ueccecscccsccccs - 268 vi CONTENTS. NUMBER XLVII.—APRIL. Page Mr. J. de C. Sowerby’s Observations upon the Habits of the Plecotus auritus, or Long-eared Bat.............-0+04. 265 Mr. G. Schweitzer’s Observations on the frequent Presence of Lead in English Chemical Preparations; on the Cause of that Presence; and other Remarks relative thereto ...... 267 Mr. J. Tovey’s further Researches in the Undulatory Theory GP gtr: & .y..c'< nies shee cian te eee eedesaiay nis ea Tels ieee Mr. W. Hopkins’s Abstract of a Memoir on Physical Geology; with an further Exposition of certain Points connected with 270 GE SGD Ct, nae ey aracd SER eae eaiels = jake a eae 272 Mr. J. T. Graves on the lately proposed Logarithms of Unity, in. Reply.to Prof De Morgan... 5 oc 6.4.2 00 n> % ani balmiee 281 Rev. Prof. Challis on the Phenomena of Drops of Oil floating TL LAT 1 RES ET oan rh Sema er ys Caries” - 288 Mr. P. Barlow’s Remarks on Lieutenant Lecount’s Treatise on PEGI AR AMUAS 2 00 Sha, ots chokes Sie ty ainsait Sky of a ain Syord Bele Lee 291 Mr. T. Squire on the Solar Eclipse of May 15th, 1836, parti- cularly as it will be seen at Alnwick, in Northumberland .. 293 Prof. J. R. Young’s Observations upon Mr. Woolhouse’s Theory Of Wena SP LACtGNS We. hie fannie, 9 sg hh ssa: crete See 295 Mr. C. Fox on the Construction of Skew Arches .......... 299 Rev. Baden Powell’s further Observations on M. Cauchy’s Theory of the Dispersion of Light.................... 305 Proceedings of the Geological Society, (Anniversary Address of Charles Lyell, Esq. President) ...........000...0000: 310 ——___—__—_——_ Linnean Society; Zoological Society 345-346 ——— at the Meetings of the Royal Institution ...... 348 On the Attractive and Repulsive Forces of Magnets at very BIMAL AVISEANEES 2 < widis wois ayrinyesk stir = 40 ci tiecaper ee inten thet oe 349 On the Aurora of the 18th November last ..............,. 350 Note on Mr. Atkinson’s Paper inserted in the last Number of our Journal mage NSB oe. to n.< st-\m.nssisielaposave esleltS/ctee ie Cer rope | Meteotological Observations, . . ....0).(..2.66 se jee 91900 2 80 351 NUMBER XLVIII.—MAY. Dr. R. Kane on the Action of Hydrochloric Acid on certain Sulphates, and particularly on the Sulphate of Copper.... 353 Mr. W. Hopkins’s Abstract of a Memoir on Physical Geology; with a further Exposition of certain Points connected with the Subject (continued)........... steaiats. sated perl 9 ea 357 Sir Philip de Malpas Grey Egerton’s Catalogue of Fossil Fish in the Collections of Lord Cole and Sir Philip Grey Egerton, arranged alphabetically; with References to the Localities, Geological Positions, and published Descriptions of the SUE R awe cas aU IEE Piles te rtm. ys. tle hee ta 366 Mr. C. Rumker on a new Method of reducing Lunar Obser- vations for the Determination of the Longitude,......... 373 CONTENTS. vil ‘ Page Sir D. Brewster’s Observations on the Lines of the Solar Spec- trum, and on those produced by the Earth’s Atmosphere, and by the Action of Nitrous Acid Gas .....-.+--+-.--- 384 Mr. W.S. B. Woolhouse on the Theory of Vanishing Fractions, in Reply to the Observations of Professor Young ........ 393 Mr. E. Solly’s further Experiments on Conducting Power for Electricity ee. . ~~ sup» = fale Sate OSU, 1 Ia oe -. 400 Reviews, and Notices respecting New Books: — Young's Theory and Solution of Algebraic Equations .......... 402 Weigmann’s Herpetologia Mexicana ........+.+++++- 410 Cooper’s Flora Metropolitana ........-.+00++- +1008 411 Samouelle’s Entomologist’s Useful Compendium, 2nd Edit. 412 Proceedings of the Royal Society.........-...--+++40-: 412 aS TSS SE en eek Sate ac 423 Royal Society of Edinburgh—Dr. Hope's Address on presenting the Keith Medal to Prof. Forbes, for his Experiments on the Refraction and Polarization of Heat 424 Cambridge Philosophical Society ...... 429 Camden Philosophical Institution ...... 43) Sir John F. W. Herschel’s Views on Scientific and General Education, applied to the proposed System of Instruction in the South-African College ........ 22-25. -e eee ee ee -» 432 On the Aurora Borealis of November 18, 1835, as witnesse at Collumpton in Devonshire, by N.S. Heineken=.:.4::... . 439 Lieut. Lecount’s Reply to Mr. Barlow............+---00.- 439 Botanical Society of Edinburgh ...........--.4---00---- 440 Inquiry relative to Dr. Pemberton’s Translation and Illustra- tions of Newton’s Principia, by Prof. Rigaud ............ 44] On Suberic Acid and its Combinations ................ 22 443 Phloridzine;—Thebaia, a new Alkali in Opium............ 444 New Renal Calculus........-- PSE As RO. PUNTO US 2 SS 446 Solidification of Carbonic Acid ................42 eee. 446 Arsenovinic Acid—Meteorological Observations NUMBER XLIX.—JUNE. Prof. Forbes on the Mathematical Form of the Gothic Pendent 449 Rev. Prof. Ritchie's Experimental and Physical Researches in Electricity and Magnetism .......... ee a ee 455 M. Cauchy on a New Formula for solving the Problem of In- terpolation in a Manner applicable to Physical Investigations 459 Sir D. Brewster on the Colours of Natural Bodies.......... 468 Rev. J. H. Pratt on the Proposition that a Function of @ and can be developed in only one Series of Laplace’s Coeffi- cients; the Function being supposed not to become infinite between the Limits o and x of 6’ and o and 27 of W Mr. Faraday on a supposed new Sulphate and Oxide of An- TUMIOIY . sa te ewe ciclo eelabe + "5 nea. d he Remap a 26 © 476 Mr. J. Nixon’s Table of observed Terrestrial Retractions .... 479 Mr. J. Blackwall’s Characters of some undescribed Species of ATOM .....0000: posarvtengnicsahscerene Mare an vein Meee Vill CONTENTS. : gue, bs Page Rev. P. Keith on the Conditions of Germination, in Reply to MaDeGandolle sates. 3.50. ccc). ils coe ee eee obots lle ater 491 Dr. R. Kane’s Experiments on the Action of Ammonia on the Chlorides and Oxides of Mercury, and on the Composition of White Precipitate’. >...) kyips slgade.s six's «IES. a ateseia lee 495 Mr. Tovey’s Researches in the Undulatory Theory of Light, in continuation of former Papers..............+++- e006. 500 Mr. Beke on the former Extent of the Persian Gulf, and on the Non-identity of Babylon and Babel; in Reply to Mr. Carter 506 Prof. Young on the Theory of Vanishing Fractions --...... 515 Mr. Faraday on the History of the Condensation of the Gases, in Reply to Dr. Davy, introduced by some Remarks on that of Electro-magnetic Rotation ....... 056. ccec0. scien 521 SUPPLEMENTARY NUMBER. Mr, Charlesworth on the Crag of Suffolk, and on the Fallacies connected with the Method now usually employed for ascer- taining the relative Age of Tertiary Deposits ............ 529 Sir W. R. Hamilton’s Theorem respecting Algebraic Elimina- tion, connected with the Question of the Possibility of re- solving in finite Terms the general Equation of the Fifth WSR WER I tet Wieds eae a) fo wien posto alba dent 1s hake APRS ofa /u 0 Bisbee. sh 538 New Books :—Webster’s Principles of Hydrostatics; and Theory of the Equilibrium and Motion of Fluids........ 544 Proceedings of the Royal Society 22.02.20 0..0.. sete ol 545 a Geological Society ........ satel Bec ee 553 Sa SS ean OcIeey. iio heee Oa oc Shee 580 On the Properties of Liquid Carbonic Acid................ 583 Ataalrama|tion of Zin’ Piatesety .! 70245 ciao Hah tie ola Bom 585 Crystallized Oxichloride of Antimony..............06..4- 585 M. Guérin-Vary on Potatoe Starch ................000.5- 586 Artificial Camphor or Camphogene...................00- 588 NEW 4ACIO. OL STGIBIOE 7. co. 4.0. ic:e-s aternn' =o reels aE o.. Riblale s 588 Observations on the Eclipse of May 15, 1836.............. 589 Figeite ne Panett aso rye Aw pela ants aye ocala MnRe os, «e's = coe oan 591 Note respecting certain controversial Communications lately sent for insertion in this Journal ...................... 591 Meteorological Observations............-... 202. eeeeee 592 Pndexty.'\o-uimyme es is Se A ee ee ets oe 594 PLATES. I. A Plate illustrative of Mr.'T. Warton Jones’s Paper on the Eye of the Sepia Loligo. IJ. A Plate illustrative of Sir D. Brewsrer’s Paper on the Crystalline Lenses of Animals, and of Prof. Wacner’s Observations on the Compound Eyes of Insects. ILI. A Plate illustrative of Mr. C.Fox’s Paper on the Construction of Skew Arches. IV. A Plate illustrative of Prof, Fonszs’s Paper on the Gothic Pendent. ee. Ce a ¢ er ” 7. : = . hoe ra : , , Pr a a ~ E oe Lon. bEiin fiat. Mag Vol.8. FEI, zs - , “ ~S , 4 = P. * e ° a - v¥ . ® ‘ . . EYE OF PUK SEP LA I OLdG@a. Sri fod by wart & Soreé ee ae ee ee ee THE LONDON ano EDINBURGH PHILOSOPHICAL MAGAZINE AND JOURNAL OF SCIENCE. [THIRD SERIES.) JANUARY 1836. I. On the Retina and Pigment of the Eye of the Common Cala- mary (Sepia Loligo). By'THomas Wuarrton Jones, Esg.* JN the eye of the Cuttlefish tribe, the retina is said to be si- tuated behind a thick layer of dark pigment. As such a structure would have the effect of intercepting more or less completely the rays of light, the strangeness of it has particu- larly attracted the attention of the physiologist and optician. The eye in the Cephalopodous Mollusca presents several ano- malies when compared with that of the Vertebrata, but I am inclined to think that the structure just mentioned is not one of them. This is at least the case in the eye of the Sepza Loligo, which I have carefully examined ; and what is found in one species probably also exists in the other genera and species of the order. My dissections and microscopical examinations of the eye of the SepiaLoligo show, that what has hitherto been described as pigment is in reality not so, but a nervous expansion of a peculiar texture, tinged of a reddish brown colour—a circum- stance which has given rise to the error of supposing it merely pigment. Before describing the structure of the retina, it will not be out of place first to notice the optic nervous apparatus, which differs remarkably from what is observed in the Verte- brata. In connexion with the cerebral ganglion, on each side, is a large nervous mass, or ganglion, from which fibrils pro- ceed in a peculiar manner to the eyeball. On either side of the nervous mass, or optic ganglion as it may be called, the fibrils * Communicated by the Author. Third Series. Vol. 8. No. 43. Jan. 1836. B 2 Mr. T. Wharton Jones on the Retina and Pigment arise, and immediately after their origin intercross with each other, those from the one side going to the opposite side of the eye, and contrariwise. The nervous fibrils from the fore end of the ganglion do not intercross, but proceed directly to the eye. The fibrils which thus arise from the optic ganglion are in very great number. They cover to a considerable ex- tent the posterior surface of the eyeball, and each penetrates singly the thin cartilaginous lamina which corresponds to a sclerotica. The optic fibrils having thus entered the eyeball expand into a layer of a light reddish-brown tinge, which I shall distinguish by the name of the first layer of the retina. What I call the second layer of the retina, is the reddish brown membrane, which, I have already mentioned, is the part usually considered as pigment. It is situated within the first layer; and betwixt the two there intervenes a pretty thick and dark layer of pigment, through apertures in which the nervous substance passes from the first layer of the retina to form the second. Examined with the microscope, the second layer of the retina, which, as I have said, is of a reddish brown colour, is observed to be composed of short fibres per- pendicular to its surfaces. These fibres, towards the inner surface, end in a delicate pulpy nervous substance, also tinged of a reddish brown colour, particularly on its inner surface, which has a corrugated or papillary appearance. I think it unnecessary to notice further the structure of the eye of the Calamary, but shall content myself with referring to the annexed figures (Plate I.) and their explanation. Since writing the above I have examined the eye of an Octopus, and have found the retina and pigment to possess the sume structure as in this Calamary. Explanation of the Plate. Figure 1. Represents the brain and two eyes of the Sepia Loligo. On the right side are seen the optic ganglion, and the fibrils which arise from it expanding themselves- on the back of the eye previously to their penetrating the sclerotica. On the left side is a horizontal section of the eye and optic ganglion. a. Cerebral ganglion. 6. Subcesophageal ganglion. c. A black probe introduced into the nervous collar, through which the cesophagus passes. d. Optic ganglion of the right side: e, e,e. The nervous fibrils which arise from it and enter the eye to form the retina. ,f Optic ganglion of the left side cut horizontally. g, g. Optic fibrils arising from the ganglion and penetrating the sclerotica at different points. A, 4, 4, h. The of the Eye of the Common Calamary (Sepia Loligo). 3 sclerotica, which is cartilaginous. 7,2. A cartilaginous part, which may be compared in some respects to the cornea of the Vertebrata. It has a large opening in its centre, through which the lens projects. 4, 4. A thin membrane which lines the inner surface of the preceding part, and extends a little beyond the edge of the opening in it. This membrane, which is covered on its inner surface with a dark pigment, may be looked on as a kind of iris. It is reflected on the anterior surface of the structure which supports the lens, and is continuous with the outer lamina of the anterior segment of the latter. J, J, 7,1. A silvery-like membrane, which may be called the conjunctiva. m,m. Kirst layer of the retina. Opposite that part where the optic fibrils cover the back part of the eye, this layer of the retina is joined by the fibrils immediately on their entrance, but further forward the fibrils run a little way within the sclerotica before joining the retina, which produces the ap- pearance of another layer. m, ”. Second layer of the retina. 0,0. Pigment situated betwixt the two layers of the retina. p- The lens. It is a sphere divided into two unequal seg- ments, an anterior smaller, and a posterior larger. Betwixt the two segments is interposed a thin transparent membrane q, which is continued from the first layer of the retina, and is joined by athin membrane r, which arises from the sclerotica. The lens, as in the Vertebrata, is composed of laminz and fibres. The outer laminz of the lens are continued into a plicated structure situated around its circumference, on either surface of the membrane which is interposed betwixt the segments of the lens. s,s. A transparent membrane,which may be called the hyaloid. It does not, however, completely inclose the aqueous fluid which represents the vitreous hu- mour. ¢. A cartilaginous pulley, through which play the sub- divisions of a tendon u, common to a membraneous muscle surrounding either eyeball. Figure 2. Shows the intercrossing of the optic fibrils after their origin from the optic ganglion. Figure 3. A section of the layers of the retina magnified. a. The optic fibrils joining 6. the first layer of the re- tina. c. The pigment interposed between the first and second layers. d. Second layer of the retina, composed of short fibres perpendicular to its surfaces. e. A pulpy nervous substance in which the fibres end on the inner surface. Sha re II. Notice on the Fossil Beaks of four extinct Species of Fishes, referrible to the Genus Chimera, that occur in the Oolitic and Cretaceous Formations of England. By the Rev. WM. Buckianp, D.D. F.G.S., Professor of Geology and Minera- legy in the University of Oxford.* BOUT six years ago, Sir Philip Grey Egerton procured from the Kimmeridge clay of Shotover Hill, near Oxford, five remarkable fossil bodies of most curious configuration, in some degree resembling beaks of Cuttlefishes and Turtles, but not reducible to any known form in either of these families. In 1832, the Rev. C. Townsend of Great Milton, near Ox- ford, discovered in the Portland stone of that village another series of bones, resembling those from the Kimmeridge clay, but very much larger, and of a different species. On my submitting these specimens to Mr. Mantell, he im- mediately compared them with three similar bones in his collec- tion,—one from the Chalk marl of Hamsey, and two from the Chalk near Lewes. These were obviously the same parts of two other species of animals of the same genus. That from the Chalk marl had been shown by him to Cuvier, who could only recognise in it a distant resemblance to the articulating posterior portion of a jaw of a Saurian; but this resemblance was not maintained in the more perfect fragments of other species which had come into my possession from the Kimme- ridge and Portland beds. Mr. Mantell permitted me at this time to prepare a draw- ing of the fragment from the Chalk marl which he had sub- mitted to Cuvier. After searching in vain through the best collections in Lon- don, and consulting our best comparative anatomists, I could find no animal whose beak or jaws corresponded with either of the forms of fossil bones under consideration. During the last five years I have lost no opportunity of submitting these fossils to skilful comparative anatomists, and with the same result. My exhibition of several of them to some of the most distinguished anatomists of Germany, at the meeting of the Naturforscher at Bonn in September last, threw no further light upon the subject. The nearest approxima- tion that was suggested to me came from Professor Carus, who advised me to compare the two smallest of these fossils (evidently a pair) with the beak of a Tetrodon. In pursuance of this advice, I examined all the Tetrodons in every museum I visited after my departure from Bonn, and arrived at no other conclusion than the assurance that * Communicated by the Author. This paper was read before the Geo- logical Society on the 4th of November, 1835. On the Fossil Beaks of four Species of Chimeera. 5 not one of these supposed fossil beaks could be referred to that genus. In examining the rich collection in the museum at Leyden, a few days ago, with my friend Professor Van Breda, I found by the side of a Tetrodon a skeleton of that rare fish the Chimera monstrosa, of which I had never before seen the bones, and instantly recognised in the upper and lower jaws of this animal the object of my long research. The two intermaxillary bones of the upper jaw corresponded with the pair of tooth- like bones from the Kimmeridge clay, which I had in vain compared with the teeth of the Zetrodon; the superior maxillary bones corresponded with a second pair of the fossil bones from the same clay ; and the lower maxillary of the Chimera presented the form of the fossil inferior maxil- lary bones of my four different species from the Portland stone, Kimmeridge clay, Chalk marl, and Chalk. This discovery of the type of each of these new forms of fossil bones in the mouth of a living species of Chimera, at once clears up all the difficulties of which I have so long been seeking the solution, and enables me to announce the exist- ence of four fossil species of a genus hitherto unheard of in the annals of Paleontology; one in each of the following four different formations, namely, the Portland stone, Kim- meridge clay, Chalk marl, and Chalk. To that discovered in the Portland stone; I propose to give the name of Chimera Townsendii ; to that in the Kimmeridge clay, Chimera Eger- tonii; to that in the chalk marl, Chimera Agassizit; and to that in the chalk, Chimera Mantelliz. On my submitting these fossils to Professor Agassiz, he at once admitted them to belong to the genus Chimera, a genus of which the living individuals are extremely rare, and of which he knows not where a single prepared skeleton exists, except in the museum at Leyden. The only known living species of the genus Chimera is widely diffused, and- is usually found pursuing herrings and migratory fishes: it lives chiefly in the northern seas, and occurs also in the Mediterranean. It is most nearly allied to the family of Sharks, and is from two to three feet long. The cartilaginous nature of its skeleton explains the reason why no other bones of the fossil Chimera have been found, together with those that form their very peculiar jaws. The hard horny plates which cover these jawbones in the living species, and perform the office of teeth, are in none of our fossil specimens preserved. ‘The two intermaxillary bones of the upper jaw of the Chimera Lgertonii have nearly the hardness of enamel, and appear to have had no separable horny covering: the 6 Dr. Buckland on the Fossil Beaks of four extinct Species superior and inferior maxillary bones of the same species exhibit rugous surfaces of attachment, from which their horny coverings have been removed. The same marks of attach- ment are seen in the lower jaw-bones of the Chimera Agassizit and Chimera Mantellii. The horny investment of all these bones has evidently fallen off and perished, like the horny covering which separates readily from the bony beak of Tur- tles, and which is rarely, if ever, found with the bones of fossil Testudinata. The genus Chimera is one of the most remarkable among living fishes, as a link in the family of Chondroptérygiens. The fact of the existence of many fossil species of this curious genus (and some of these much larger than the single known existing species) in such early periods as those of the Oolitic and Cretaceous formations leads to important considerations in Physiology. Professor Agassiz has at my request prepared the following description of the four fossil species which form the subject of this communication. Further details and figures will be pub- lished by him in the eighth number of his Pozssons Fossiles. Note by Professor Agassiz. The discovery of the genus Chimera among. fossil fishes is one of the most interesting and unexpected. Recent Chimeras are very little known, and have been ar- ranged in the order of cartilaginous fishes, but their organi- zation, and especially the structure of their skeleton, has not been sufficiently studied. Dr. Buckland’s discovery will draw the attention of Ichthyologists in a particular manner to this singular family. ‘The four fossil species about to be enumer- ated differ essentially from each other, and are considerably larger than the living. Unfortunately the fossil fragments which we now possess are far from being complete; only the jaws of these curious fishes have hitherto been discovered, and principally the lower jaws. In the Portland species, the Chimera Townsendii, which is the largest, the inferior maxillary is very large, short, and proportionally much thicker, the groove of the symphysis of its two branches shallower, and the cavity of the dental edge broader than in the other species; its exterior surface is con- vex and furrowed longitudinally with shallow wrinkles. The intermaxillary bone is much bent. In the Chimera Egertonii the inferior maxillary is short and flat; its snout is truncated, and in proportion very large ; the cavity of the dental edge is very wide and the groove of its symphysis very deep; the intermaxillary is much bent, and of Fishes referrible to the Genus Chimera. e the dental edge truncated and square; the superior maxillary is irregularly triangular, much elongated, and contracts in- sensibly towards its dental extremity, which is bifid. In the Chimera Agassizii of Dr. Buckland the inferior maxillary is the most regular in form of the four species; it is nearly square, and has the dental edge slightly open; the sur- face of the symphysis is flatter than in the other species. The Chimera Mantellii has the inferior jaw straighter and thinner: its exterior surface is perfectly smooth and flat; its snout is much elongated and pointed, and the cavity of the dental edge wider. Since Dr. Buckland’s discovery of the above four species, I have found a fifth in the collection of Mr. Greenough, which differs considerably from them all, in the extreme shortness of the lower jaw, the length of which is less than its height. The symphysis of the lower jaw is flat; the dental margin truncated and grooved in its hinder part. The external sur- face is smooth; the middle of the inner surface concave; the intermaxillary is flatter than in the Chimera Egertonii, and terminates in a straight point. The superior maxillary is shorter than that of the Chimera Egertonii. I propose to give to this species of so remarkable a genus the name of Chimera Greenovii. The locality of this fossil is unknown. Oxford, Oct. 27, 1835. III. On the Relation between the Velocity and Length of a Wave,.in the Undulatory Theory of Light. By Joun Tovey, Esq. To the Editors of the Philosophical Magazine and Journal. GENTLEMEN, [X the last volume but one of your Magazine, the Rev. Pro- fessor Powell presented us with an abstract of the essential principles of M. Cauchy’s View of the Undulatory Theory of _ Light; by which, as Mr. Powell says, it appears “ that a rela- tion between the velocity and length of a wave is established on M. Cauchy’s principles, provided the molecules are so disposed that the intervals between them always bear a sensi- ble ratio to the length of an undulation.” vol. vi. p. 266. Since I first read this, I have arrived at the same result as M. Cauchy by a less complicated method, which I proceed to lay before you. Ido this with diffidence, having read scarcely anything on the subject besides the abstract above mentioned and Professor Airy’s tract. Should you deem 8 Mr. Tovey on the Relation between the Velocity and my method worthy of a place in your Journal, I shall pro- bably send you a continuation of the subject. Let m,m’, m', &c. be the masses of the particles of ether; let the rectangular coordinates of m be 2, y,2; those of m’, xv+Axr,y+Ay, z+ Az; of m', r+ Az’, yt Ay, z+Az, &e. Let r = /(Az?+ Ay?+3s?), 7) = /(Aa!?+ Ay’? + Az’?), &c. Suppose the masses to be all equal, and the force of one par- ticle on another to be a function of their distance multiplied by m3; and suppose each particle to be influenced only by the attractions or repulsions of the other particles; then as the cosines of the angles which 7 makes with the positive direc- A A A seh tions of z, y, 2 are =, —, = we have (by the princi- ples of statics), when the system is in equilibrium, m= me Aai=s0; mz, £1) Ay = 0, me 20) he O (1.) The sums = extending to all the particles within the sphere of the attractive or repulsive influence of the particle m, which may be any particle of the system. Now, suppose the system to be disturbed, and that at the end of the time ¢, the displacements of m, in the directions of 2, Y, % be &, 7, $; and those of m’, E+ AE, y+Ayn, $+A’; and suppose Aé, Ay, A to be so small that we may neglect their squares and rectangles; then the distance of these particles being r+ Ar = oy [(Axv+A£)?+ (Ay+An)?+(Az+A8)*], we have _ ArAf+ AyAn+ Az AE Ps The cosines of the directions which » + Ar makes with those Axv+Ake Ay+An Az+AT. r+Ar? r+Ar? r+Ar ’ write X, Y, Z for the sums of the components of the forces acting on m, in the directions of 2, y, z, we have Ar of z,y, z will be and if we he J (r+4r) = 7 2 Sis der (Aaw+ A€), “4A Yame, SOTA ay san) (2.) T= m2 Lets) (Az+AQ). Length of a Wave, in the Undulatory Theory of Light. 9 df (r) Inge Sd Ar Now,f(r+Ar) = f(r) += Ar FERp eT Ro gm consequently, 2 (r+Ar) mein). (2 Ces oO : Pg Ast Aes at (Ce 2D) ar} (Ax + Aé) =O nay LO) a gy (one i) (ArAEt+AyAn+Az 8) Az, by substituting for Ax its value previously found. If in this expression we write ¢ (7) for a, wv (r) for (4 ote 3 dy an and substitute it in the first of the equa- tions (2.), we shall have by virtue of the first of the equa- tions (1.), X=ms.{o(r)AE+ (r) (ArAE+AyAn+AzA$) 2}. The second and third of the equations (2.) are similar to the first, consequently if we transform them in the same man- vats f @E dy ner, and (by the principles of dynamics) put WP? dP oe. qe for X, Y, Z, we shall have 23 = m=.{o(r)AE+U(r).(ArAg + AyAy + AzAS)Ar}, d*y ape E.{o(r)Ant(r). (AvAg+ AyAn+ AzAg)Ay}, (3.) os = mE Lo(r)AL+ (7) . (APE + AyAn) +AzAd)As}. From these general equations, a number of integrals, adapted to particular cases, may be found. Let us suppose the vibrations of the particles to be performed in straight lines, all in one direction. This is a case of polarized light. Let x be taken in the direction of the vibrations; then y and ¢ will be zero, and the first of the equations (3.) will give iM 26 = mz. {o(r) + (rr) Aa} AE. (4.) Third Series. Vol. 8. No. 43. Jan. 1836. C 10 Mr. Tovey on the Relation between the Velocity and Now, let £ be a function of x and ¢, then for AE we may PE Az? dE Ag aE det dz ae) ae dB 23 “ (r)+(r) Ax*} Azt write s’*, then the last equation will be 2 2 4 ae ae ey th (5.) t dz dz If we omit the last term, this equation becomes exactly of the same form as that for the transmission of sound, and gives then no relation between the length and velocity of the waves. But if we integrate the equation as it is, we shall obtain a re- lation of this sort; and this relation will afford a theory of | the dispersion of light. As § is a function of z and ¢, it may be expressed by a series of terms such as p sin t+ q cos nt, where p and g are functions of z, and ” a constant quantity*. Suppose then & = psinnt+qcosnt; substitute this value of £ in equa- tion (5.), and it will become Il © +(9 eee ea et aS od \ ee q * dz Sait, =e, * Poisson, T'raité de Mécanique, No. 514, edit. 2. Length of a Wave, in the Undulatory Theory of Light. 11 This equation must be true for all values of ¢, therefore @ U d* ept soe + gp ge =O (6.) a gl? ds Wg +878 + gage =O be) Now, as p is a function of z, it may be expressed by a series of such terms as a sin kz + 6 cos kz, where a, 6, and % are constant quantities. Substitutea sini z + bcoskz for Pp in equation (6.), and it will become n? —s? fe + % k4 = 0; hence Ae ae iter k a Aee aE i si? : =\/(*= 54") aA tome er art 3 ), nearly. As the equations (6.) and (7.) are similar, and as we have put asinkz + bcoskz for p, we must put a! sin £ + b' cos k z for q; a! and 0! being two more constant quantities. Hence £ may be expressed by a series of terms similar to (a sink z+ coskz) snnt+(a' sinkz+0' coskz) cosnt. With respect to any particular value of z, this term goes through all its values while ¢ increases by =, and with re- spect to any particular value of ¢, it goes through all its values ; A Qa - while z increases by —3 consequently it represents a wave k bey pti : OE tn of light, moving in the direction of z, with the velocity a the value of which has just been found equal to Wd gl? ) (0+ s55-) Professor Powell’s expression for this quantity is n> sin( #5") H , which is equal to H [or aay very 2 BY 4 n l nearly. As the Professor considers only one term instead of the sums s° and s'*, and as rm and J in his notation are the Qa. : : same as Az and iy in ours, the two expressions are vir- /: tually the same. C2 12 Dr. Inelis’s Extracts from his Prize Essay on Iodine. g ‘Y /2 If we examine the composition of the quantity <~;, we shall see that the relation between the length and velocity of a wave does not depend merely upon the ratio of the intervals of the particles to the length of an undulation, but also upon the radius of the sphere of their influence. On the last principle, I think we can (as M. Fresnel seems to have conjectured*) account for the dispersion of light without supposing that the waves move with different velocities in the free setherial medium; to which supposition there seems to be an insuperable objection+. But I reserve this for future consideration. In the mean time I hope Professor Powell will favour us, through the medium of your Journal, with what he has done towards the verification of M. Cauchy’s formula, having told us that he is engaged on the subjectt. I am, yours, &c. Evesham, Aug. 17, 1835. Joun Tovey. P.S. In my next communication I believe I shall be able to show that if the vibrations of the particles of zther be each decomposed into three rectangular directions, two of which are perpendicular to the direction in which the light is pro- pagated, and the other parallel to it, the vibrations in any one of these three directions may be calculated separately; and that a satisfactory reason may be assigned why the vibrations in the direction of propagation are insensible. (Airy’s Tract, art. 101.) September 3, 1835. IV. Extracts from a Prize Essay on Iodine. By JAMES Ineuis, M.D. [Continued from p. 444, and concluded. } N COURTOIS shortly after his discovery of iodine “e formed the black pulverulent iodide of nitrogen by the action of iodine upon hydrous ammonia. Gay-Lussac next described another compound of dry ammoniacal gas and iodine, which he called the ioduret of ammonia, but which might rather be called a hydriodate of an iodide of nitrogen. When this compound is thrown into water, decomposition takes place, hydriodic acid is found in the water, and the black iodide * Airy’s Tracts, p. 285, note. t Lbid. _{{ Notices of Professor Powell’s verifications of M. Cauchy’s modifica- tion of the undulatory theory, so far as they have yet been made public, will be found in Lond. and Edinb, Phil. Mag., vol. vi. p. 374; and last vo- lume, p. 293.—Eorr. } wr. Inglis’s Extracts from his Prize Essay on Iodine. 13 of nitrogen is precipitated; so that if we suppose it to bea hydriodate, then we should not require to say that hydriodic acid and iodide of nitrogen were formed at the moment of so- lution, but that they existed in the compound ready formed, and that in consequence of the greater affinity which hydriodic acid has for water than for the iodide, they separate, and the iodide precipitates, whilst the acid is held in solution, as I found to be frequently the case when experimenting on the double iodides to be noticed hereafter. If, instead of using the iodine alone with the aqua ammonia, there be added equal parts of a strong tincture of iodine and the ammonia, then I found that instead of the dark detonating ioduret, there was formed an iodide of carbon, similar to that formed by the tincture of iodine, and the alcoholic solution of potash. ‘The periodide of carbon by this process is obtained in pretty large plates. 1 equivalent of ammonia +1 of alco- hol + 6 of iodine are required, and there result 1 atom of nitrogen gas (which is evolved and found in the upper por- tion of the vessel), 1 atom of water, 2 of iodide of carbon, and 3 of hydriodic acid, which latter unites with the excess of am- monia remaining in the solution. Its presence is indicated by the addition of bichloride of mercury, and a little muriatic acid to saturate any excess of ammonia which might redissolve the red periodide of mercury which is precipitated. The black detonating teriodide of nitrogen is decomposed by almost every substance: oils and fatty matter do not cause its detonation as they do that of the chloride of nitrogen. The strong mineral acids all explode it when in a perfectly dry state. I allowed aqua ammoniz to remain over the iodide of nitro- gen, in which there was no trace of free iodine, for several weeks; the iodide was decomposed, almost half of the vessel in which I had it was filled with nitrogen, and small crystal- line points were seen floating in the fluid, at the same time that a yellowish deposition was seen at the bottom. Alcohol when allowed to remain in contact with the iodide, decomposes it. Nitrogen is evolved, the liquid becomes of a deep red colour, and iodide of carbon is formed, the smell of which is per- ceived in the fluid. Pure water is even reacted on by, or re- acts with, the elements of this iodide. I found azote given off as before, the water assumed a ruby tint, and small crystals of iodine were precipitated. The most probable cause of the explosive power of the iodide of nitrogen is this: Nitrogen requires an immense power to liquefy it. Indeed, by condensation it has never yet been done; but chlorine and iodine possess this power; the 14 Dr. Inglis’s Extracts from his Prize Essay on Iodine. tendency, however, is still to regain its original capacity, so that any substance containing hydrogen, or any other element which combines with the chlorine or iodine, instantly liberates the nitrogen, and it expands with a force equal to that which would be required to liquefy it. * * * * There is but one hydrocarburet of iodine noticed by authors; it appears in colourless acicular crystals, and is formed by the action of olefiant gas on iodine. Faraday, its discoverer, found it, in composition, quite analogous to chloric ether, and called it hydrocarburet of iodine +. After having thoroughly dried a portion of iodine I intro- duced it into a flask, which was luted on to a gas tube with sulphate of lime; then the stop-cock was opened, and a constant supply of gas was thus allowed to enter as fast as the former was absorbed. Instantly there.is action observed; the small grains of iodine on the sides of the vessel become semifluid, and of a dark colour, and the interior of the flask is gradually filled with ruddy brown fumes. In the course of four hours, the acicular colourless crystals of Faraday began to appear, and that in the shade, showing that the direct rays of the sun are not necessary, as he supposed}. After the gas had been acting on the iodine for eighteen days I removed the flask, and observed a fluid at the bottom, which when examined was of a blackish green colour. It does not combine with water, but runs into globules like oil, or more exactly like a solution of iodine in creosote when it is placed in water. On the appli- cation of the leat of a spirit-lamp to a tube containing this fluid with the mixture of a drop or two of water, slight ex- plosions take place, the black liquid is decomposed, a red fluid rises in vapour, and olefiant gas is evolved. ‘The red fluid is probably a mixture of olefiant gas and free iodine, for it instantly casts with starch the characteristic blue tint. When the black fluid is put into a small retort, and heat applied, olefiant gas is first driven off, and then a copious ef- fusion of hydriodic acid; whilst at the same time the orange red fluid again appears. When the beak of the retort is placed in water the hydriodic acid is absorbed, and portions of the red and black fluids come over also; the latter falls ot the bottom. The water precipitates starch blue, and the per- chloride of mercury instantly causes the precipitation of the periodide of mercury. Alcohol removes the substance that keeps this compound fluid, and the solid green hydrocarburet, + See Phil. Trans. for 1821 : or Phil. Mazg., vol. lix. p. 852.—Enir. } Mr. Faraday certainly formed this compound by exposing iodine and olefiant gas to the sun’s rays, but he does not explicitly represent that the “ direct rays” are necessary.—Epir. Dr. Inglis’s Extracts from his Prize Essay on Iodine. 15 to be spoken of immediately, results. The sulphuric and mu- riatic acids have no action with the dark fluid, whilst they cause the decomposition of the red, precipitating its iodine. There can be little doubt that these two fluids are different com- pounds, but a limited period prevented any further inquiry. The next compound to be spoken of is a solid hydrocar- buret of iodine, sometimes of a dark blackish colour, at other times, and oftener, of a decided green. It has never been no- ticed by any chemical author, and differs from Faraday’s in the following particulars. His is transparent, in white acicular crystals, shooting out from the sides of the flask, and formed, as I noticed before, in a very few hours after olefiant gas is brought in contact with iodine; of a sweet taste, and aromatic smell]: it fuses and sublimes unchanged. Insoluble in water, acids, and alkalies; soluble in ether and alcohol, and may be crystallized from them. This new hydrocarburet is opake, of a dark green colour, and not of crystalline texture ; is formed after a longer action of olefiant gas on iodine; is destitute of taste and smell: it fuses and is decomposed, giving rise to another new com- pound, hereafter to be noticed ; and lastly, is insoluble in both ether and alcohol. Mr. Kemp was the first to discover this compound, but he has never examined its properties. When it is first removed from the flask in which it has been formed, itis mixed with a large portion of Faraday’s hydrocarburet, and also with the fluids already noticed: these last are allowed - to drip from it, and then on boiling with alcohol the whole of Faraday’s hydrocarburet is taken up, and the green com- pound remains behind, which, after repeated washings with alcohol, may be considered pure. The former sinks in sul- phuric acid, whilst the green floats on its surface, and both are alike unacted on by it. It burns with a clear flame by heat ; it emits olefiant gas and hydriodic acid, and there re- mains behind a carbonaceous residue. At first, from the negative qualities of this green hydrocar- buret of iodine, I thought it was merely carbon; but I soon altered my opinion, for I found that by placing this in a small tube retort, I obtained a perfectly new compound by distillation. I was led to this process by observing that when the green hydrocarburet was heated, dense brown fumes escaped, which emitted the odour of garlic. A receiver was therefore adapted to the retort, and being kept cool, a liquid of a deep reddish brown colour collected in it. Whenever the stopper is removed from the bottle in which it is con- tained, the room is soon filled with the smell of assafoetida. It is, like the former, highly inflammable, and consists also of 16 Dr. Inglis’s Extracts fiom his Prize Essay on Iodine. carbon, hydrogen, and iodine. I have not examined its pro- perties further, but from its peculiar odour have called it the foetid hydrocarburet of iodine. * * * * The compound of sulphur and iodine formed by Gay- Lussac is most likely merely a mechanical mixture, for after keeping it in alcohol in a closed vessel for several months, the alcohol became saturated with iodine, and the sulphur re- mained unaltered. I tried to procure a chemical compound in the same way as the chloride of sulphur is formed, but a similar one to the last resulted. I caused hydriodic acid to come in contact with the chloride of sulphur; instant reaction took place,” muriatic acid was formed, and a dark compound, which was probably an iodide of sulphur, presented itself. Other means may be had recourse to, as Hydrosulphuret)) Hyd. Muriat. ofiodine = { Sulp. acid. and Tod. Iod. of chlorine = J Chlo. sulp. or, by the action of chloride of iodine. on sulphuretted hy- drogen, there would result, either muriatic acid and iodide of sulphur, or chloride of sulphur and hydriodic acid. Having formed the sesquiodide of phosphorus, I laid it aside in a well-stoppered bottle; it, however, in a short time attracted moisture from the air, and on removing the stopper much condensed hydriodic acid burst forth. To get rid of the fumes, I added a small portion of water, and laid it aside; on examining it again I found a yellow powder at the bottom of the fluid. I added now a little more water; but whenever the red powder came in contact with it, instant decomposition took place, and much gas was evolved with brisk effervescence, After the disengagement of the gas had ceased, there still re- mained a red powder, which being dried and exposed to a moist atmosphere did not attract moisture; therefore it is not any of the former iodides. It bears a considerable heat without change; if, however, it be continued and agitated, it bursts into flame, and burns with the characteristic appearance of phosphorus. It is most probably an oxide of phosphorus, but differs from the following in being darker in colour and much less inflammable. The oxide of phosphorus, which the former resembles, is conveniently formed by placing phos- phorus in a long glass tube, and then heating the tube until the phosphorus catches fire and liquefies. A current of air is now made to pass through the tube by blowing forcibly into one end, vivid combustion ensues, and the whole interior of the Dr. Inglis’s Extracts from his Prize Essay on Iodine. 17 tube is filled with the yellow oxide. On raising the tube after the combustion has ceased, from the horizontal to the perpen- dicular position, a splendid phenomenon takes place; a bright red glow of light commences at the bottom of the tube and gradually rises to the top after traversing the whole mass. This compound Mr. Kemp considers to be an oxide of phosphorus. I found that when carbon and dry pure boracic acid are heated to redness in a porcelain tube, and pure iodine drop- ped into it whilst at this high temperature, a small portion of a yellow compound sublimed, which I considered as an iodide of boron. * ¥ * ‘i When solutions of the protonitrate of mercury and hydrio- date of potassa are mixed together, the green protiodide of mercury is precipitated; bat by this method a portion of the yellow iodide is almost invariably found mixed along with the green, on account of the presence of a portion of the perni- trate. But this is completely obviated, and a very pure prot- iodide formed, when the elements themselves are made to act on each other. I found that on agitating together the iodine with an excess of metallic mercury in a tube, that combination was formed. After the action has commenced, the addition of a little water facilitates its completion. This iodide, by the combined influence of air and light, is resolved into metallic mercury and the biniodide. ‘To try which of these agents had the greater power, I placed a portion of the green iodide (being perfectly dry) in a closed box impenetrable by any species of light. On examining it in a few weeks afterwards, I found that it was only partially decomposed, and those portions that had undergone the change had assumed a very beautiful ap- pearance. There was rising out of the mass at different places a formation exactly similar to one of vegetable origin: |. represents a small mass of green iodide from which the ‘eryptogamic-looking excrescence sprung; 2. represents the root, which was of a red crimson colour; and 8. is the upper expanded portion, which on the exterior was covered with a feathery crystallization of the yellow iodide. The interior was hollow, and was exter- nally of the same rich red colour as its root. ‘These vegeta- tions resembled much in richness and beauty the bells of some of the finest heaths. Another portion of the green iodide was placed in a small phial filled with distilled water, which after being exposed to the light for many weeks, still retained its original green co- lour, being as yet undecomposed. Air, therefore, is the prin- Third Series. Vol. 8. No. 43. Jan. 1836. D 1g Dr. Inglis’s Extracts from his Prize Essay on Iodine. cipal agent in effecting its decomposition, since in both in- stances the temperature was the same, and must have affected each alike. As the bichloride of mercury added to a solution of the hydriodate of potassa causes the formation of the bin- iodide, it might be expected that the protochloride would give us the green protiodide, which on trying I found to be the case ; when equal parts of calomel and hydriodate of potassa are added to each other (the one in solution and the other suspended in water) an instant interchange takes place, and the green iodide is produced. This took place in all cases, whether I used the calomel in excess, or vice versd. But I found that on pouring off the supernatant liquid from the green iodide, in either of the above instances, and now adding the calomel, the precipitation wholly consisted of the beau- tiful bright yellow iodide; or, if to a solution of the nitrate of mercury in excess, there be added the above-mentioned liquid, there is instantly a flocculent precipitation of pure ses- quiodide. From these facts I presume that in the process for the production of the green iodide there is formed a sesqui- chloride of mercury, 7.e. a chloride having one half more chlorine in its composition than calomel = (2 Hg +3 Ch, or 1 Hg + 13Ch), and analogous to the sesquiodide. I men- tioned before that the same results always followed whether I used the calomel, or the hydriodate of potassa in excess. The yellow sesquiodide of mercury may be kept for any length of time excluded from the light without changing co- lour; but if exposed it soon acquires a dark hue. By heat one might suppose it had been converted into the biniodide, for it assumes first a red hue, then by continuing the heat it fuses and becomes of a deep crimson colour, and _volatilizes into crystals of the same tint, but on cooling the original yel- low is restored. It is singular enough that exactly an oppo- site effect is produced by heat on the biniodide; it is converted at 400° Fahrenheit into a deep blood-red-coloured fluid, which volatilizing condenses on the sides of the tube into yellow acicular crystals, which retain that colour for a consi- derable time, unless suddenly cooled or agitated, when the characteristic crimson tint of the biniodide again appears. The biniodide falls as a rich red powder when solutions of the bichloride of mercury and hydriodate of potassa are mixed together, and in this form it is generally seen. I, however, have procured it in pretty large crystalline cubes by the fol- lowing process. I found that it was dissolved in great abund- ance by a boiling solution of the hydriodate of zinc. I added the powdered biniodide till no more could be taken up, and Dr. Inglis’s Extracts from his Prize Essay on Iodine. 19 then placed this saturated solution under the exhausted re- ceiver of an air-pump; in a short time the biniodide began to be deposited, and svon they increased and assumed the form of large regular cubes. The hydriodate of zinc that remained was capable of dissolving a fresh quantity of biniodide, or of redissolving that which was crystallized from it: the crystals contain no zinc; they are acted on by chemical agents and by heat just in the same manner as the precipitated biniodide, and are quite distinct from the hydrargo-biniodide of zinc to be mentioned hereafter. ‘The biniodide of mercury is sufh- ciently soluble in an excess of the hydriodate of potassa, from which there results on slow evaporation a yellow salt, which I discovered many months ago, and called it the double hy- driodate of the biniodide of mercury and potash, because I found that whenever it was brought in contact with water, instant decomposition took place, the water from its strong affinity for hydriodic acid removed it, and the red biniodide was precipitated. Bonsdorff, however, calls this compound the hydrargo-biniodide of potassium. * * * On mixing bichloride of mercury in powder to a saturated solution of hydriodate of potassa, and agitating together, the whole becomes nearly asolid red mass, and much heat is at the same time generated. * * * This red iodide is formed by many other processes, as when a solution of bicyanuret of mercury is added to an alcoholic solution of iodine, in which case it instantly precipitates. When the yellow sesquiodide is kept for some time under water, and exposed to light, very good small cubic crystals of the red iodide are found covering the surface; but the method I described above is the best one for obtaining it in its cry- stalline form. I have reason to think that there is another iodide of mer- cury, of a blue colour; it is formed by freely exposing in an open vessel the red iodide with an excess of metallic mercury. In the course of three or four weeks the surface assumes a decidedly blue tint. I have not as yet further examined this compound. * i = ii * * On examining the crystal of the iodide of lead with the aid of the microscope, it is found to be a flat six-sided cry- stal [prism?]. This, next to the tetrahedron, appears, from what I have observed to be the most common form of crystallization. * * *. I found that when, in- stead of using just a neutralizing sufficiency of hydriodate of potassa and acetate of lead, the hydriodate was added in excess, there was thrown down a white soft powder and not the yellow iodide. And by ammonia the yellow iodide is converted into 2 SS ED) “yd, WG» Mpeg ifr iiss SS y, XZ 20 ~=©Mr. Henwood on the Steam-Engines of Cornwall. a similar white powder, which, perhaps, may be another iodide of lead. If metallic tin be boiled with the iodide of lead, no reaction takes place; but if the dry iodide be mixed with gra- nulated tin, and exposed to heat, combination takes place, and a double iodine of tin and lead results, of a brown colour and differing from either iodide separately. By boiling this double iodide in water, very beautiful crystals of the yellow iodide of lead are obtained. [To be continued.] V. Observations on the Steam Engines of Cornwall; in Reply to John Taylor, Esq., F.R.S., Treas. G.S., Sc. By W. J. Henwoop, F.G.S. Lond. & Paris, Hon. M.Y.P.S., Curator of the Royal Geological Society of Cornwall. To the Editors of the Philosophical Magazine and Journal. GENTLEMEN, R. TAYLOR’s communication in your present month’s Number* appears to imply that a rotatory single engine working expansively is something of a novelty. Now, Mr. Watt’s first expansion engine was erected in 1778+; the patent for his rotatory engine was taken out in 1781, October 25th ¢; and that for his double engine in 1782, March 12th §. Thus the rotatory single engine working expansively pre- ceded the invention of the double engine; and some of the former construction were erected by Messrs. Boulton and Watt on the Cornish mines. At Binner Downs mine in this county Messrs. Gregor and Thomas have erected five rotatory single engines working ex- pansively ; the first of them in 1828, the last in 1833. Captain Gregor also set up a similar one, for driving a common grist mill, for Messrs. Harvey and Co. of Hayle Foundry. All these have performed their work extremely well; are quite as manageable as double engines ; and, where they have taken their place, have worked with much less coal. The duty of those at Binner Downs, which are used as winding (whim) engines, Captain Gregor estimates at about 15 millions of pounds raised one foot, high by the use of each bushel of coal consumed ||. Mr. Taylor speaks of “the method of working high pres- sure steam expansively, which we owe to Mr. Woolf.” * Vol. vii. p. 369. + Farey on the Steam-Engine, p. 341. t Ibid., p. 346. § Ibid., p. 350. Captain Lean reports the duty of Mr. Sims’s engine at Charlestown 44, and not 60, millions, as stated by Mr. Taylor. § Lond. and Edinb. Phil. Mag., vol. vil. p. 369. Dr. Hudson on an Error in Dr. Apjohn’s Formula, 21 Now, in former numbers of this Journal*, I have shown that in 1811—1812, Captain Trevithick erected a single engine at Huel Prosper mine, in which steam of above 40 pounds pressure on the square inch was worked expansively. Mr. Farey observest that Mr. Woolf came to reside in Cornwall about the year 1813, and the “ first engines for pumping water from the mines were set up by him in 1814;” but these, he adds, - had two cylinders. I therefore repeat, that we do not owe this practice to Mr. Woolf, but to Captain Trevithick. But it has been already shown that this is only an extension of Mr. Watt’s practice of 1778. The advance in the duty of steam engines which has taken place in this county within the seven years last past, is princi- pally, if not entirely, due to Captain Grose; and is obtained mainly by the application of substances which transmit heat very slowly, to the surfaces of the portions of the apparatus containing dense steam. I remain, Gentlemen, Yours, &c. 1, Morrab Place, Penzance, W. J. HEnNwoop. November 28, 1835. VI. Onan Error in Dr. Apjohn’s Formula for inferring the Specific Heats of dry Gases. By H. Hupson, M.D., M.R.LA. To the Editors of the Philosophical Magazine and Journal. GENTLEMEN, BEG to point out a serious error in the formula given (in p. 385 of your 7th volume) by Dr. Apjohn for ascertaining the specific heats of gases by their action on the “ evaporation thermometer.” I have shown (in your Journal for October last, same vol., p. 257,) that (taking the density of air at 212° under 30 pressure as unity) the density of the vapour of satura- tion at 7° is = wept * 13°75, consequently (the weight of *327958 a cubic inch of air at 212° under 30 being nti E t) the weight of a cubic inch of the vapour of saturation at 2° i= of Grs. —/—_ x 327958 ; at of at t° be- usa * 3°27958; also the latent heat of vapour at ¢° be * Phil. Mag. and Annals, vol. vii. p. 323, March 1830, and vol. x. p. 98, August 1831. + Ibid., vol. viii. p. 308. f -327958 is the weight at 32° (Prout), and 1°375 the expansion be- tween 32° and 212° (Gay-Lussac). 22 Dr. Hudson on an Error in Dr. Apjohn’s Formula. ing = 1168—¢ (capacity of water being = 1), it follows that 1168—t eas Up NEA | oaths ery x f x 327958 of water in falling 1° will give out the quantity of heat necessary to produce this cubic inch of vapour. But in the experiments with dry gases an equal volume (i. e. one cubic inch) of the gas falling V° produces this same effect; consequently (S being the weight of a cubic inch of the gas at ¢°) VxS gives the weight of the gas which would produce this effect in falling 1°; from whence it is obvious that 1 (the capacity of water): C (the capacity of 1168—¢ 1168—¢ “ J; —____ 27 dO ae the gas)::S x \ 748 Lt x f x 3°27958, and C 44840: x a x 3:27958; or (since S’,the weight of a cubic inch of S x 508 MALES . fe} ( RSs the gas at 60°, = ade we have by substitution 1168—t x f Gy eS Se ° 456. Vx’ x 006456 Now, if V (the depression of wet thermometer) in hydro- gen gas be = 20° (/’, the temperature of wet ball being 48°), and if V in atmospheric air be = 25° (¢ being = 43°), and Gr. taking weight of cubic inch of hydrogen at 60° = 0:02153, Grs. and weight of cubic inch of air at 60° = 0°3099*; conse- quently, 1120 x 34875 _ ee 20 xc02153 © 006456 = 5°856, , 2 A D185 % 99848). Wow hag and capacity of air = STU a is 006456= 2751. Dr. Apjohn appears to have used ( for every gas) the weight of a cubic inch of air, instead of S, the weight of the particu- lar gas. Accordingly, the experiments (except with hydrogen) rather favour my view that the capacities of gases are equal in equal volumes. The same I believe to be true with hydrogen, and that V will be found the same in every gas (with an improved apparatus for trying the experiments) under similar circum- stances of temperature and pressure, if the current of gas be sufficiently powerful. capacity of hydrogen = * J have supposed P (the pressure) = 30. ‘The requisite alteration in 1168 —t x f the value of S! gives C= —Vxsxp ™ 006456 x 30. Prof. Powell’s Remarks on M. Melloni’s Paper. 23 Hoping for an immediate insertion of this, I shall reserve any remarks on the probable errors in the experiments, and their causes, for a future occasion. I am, Gentlemen, yours, &c. 24, Stephen’s Green, Dublin, H. Hupson. Nov. 11, 1835. VII. Remarks on a Paper on the Transmission of Calorific Rays, &c. by M. MEtont, in the Phil. Mag. and Journal of Science, No. 42. By the Rev. B. Power, M.A., F.R.S., Savilian Professor of Geometry, Oxford.* N the last Number of this Journal (vol. vii. p. 475) a short communication appears from M. Melloni, in which that di- stinguished experimenter has honoured me with a reference to the experiment which I tried in 1825, which forms the basis of a peculiar view of the nature of the heat originating from lu- minous hot bodies, and which M. Melloni has since successfully verified with his extremely delicate apparatus, so as entirely to remove all doubt, which (I presume from the silence of phy- sical writers) must previously have been felt on the subject. But while he speaks with approbation of that experiment, M. Melloni refers to my views connected with it in terms which imply a most singular misconception of them, and on which I therefore feel it necessary to offer a very few remarks. M. Melloni describes me as “ endeavouring to explain his results by hypotheses” which are untenable. Now, I am not aware of having attempted to explain M. Melloni’s results at all. All that I have contended for is, that if the distinction between two kinds of heat, “luminous and obscure” (as the author terms them), be admitted, (and he himself, I believe, admits it,) it will follow, that all results which have hitherto been commonly stated as referring to “ radiant heat,” will require now to be more precisely worded, and we must say which sort of radiant heat we mean, in all cases where there may be both present. That particular result which M. Melloni obtained in the repetition of my experiment with the thermomultiplier, and which so strongly confirms it, I have, indeed, adverted to as, to my apprehension, ill explained by the gratuitous hypothesis, that the heat acquires a new property with regard to its re- lations to surfaces by merely passing through glass; which seems to me at once needless and contrary to all analogy; * Communicated by the Author. 24 Prof. Powell’s further Observations on M. Cauchy’s and, instead of it, I have maintained the simple conclusion of two kinds of heat simultaneously emanating or originating from luminous hot bodies. As to contending that this distinction of two kinds of heat ‘‘ suffices to explain all the facts relative to transmission,” I should have been glad if M. Melloni had pointed out any passage in which I have contended for anything of the kind. The facts of transmission (and for all these most curious and important facts we are entirely indebted to the experimental skill of M. Melloni) are of a kind as yet appearing so little reducible to fixed laws that I should imagine any theory en- tirely premature; certainly I have offered none. The experiment described by M. Melloni (p. 477 at the bottom) is undoubtedly a most curious and interesting one, but how it applies to the question relative to mine I fail in perceiving. It proves, the author conceives, that there are in this case ‘several different kinds of dark heat.” It is true we have hitherto known of but one, and I have referred only to one in my researches, but I have never denied that there may be two, three, or a hundred kinds. I have merely maintained that there are characteristic and well-marked distinctions in the properties of any or all non-luminous heat (to adopt for brevity the barbarously incorrect language which is becoming current) from those of the luminous kind; but there may still be many more such characteristic distinctions, and some such M. Melloni seems to have established in this experiment. I look with great interest to the further extension of this curious inquiry on a point requiring the most careful exami- nation; while I acknowledge that the thermomultiplier of M. Melloni has opened to us an entirely new field of investi- gation, and in the hands of its inventor and of Prof. Forbes has done more for the advance of our knowledge in this de- partment within a very short time past, than the most san- guine would have ventured to anticipate. VIII. Further Observations on M. Cauchy’s Theory of the Di- spersion of Light. By the Rev. BapEN Powe 1, M.4A., F.R.S., Savilian Professor of Geometry, Ouford.* N a former paper, which is inserted in successive portions of this Journal, No. 31 e¢ seq. (vol. vi.), I have given an abstract of M. Cauchy’s highly important researches on the undulatory theory, so far as they bear on the great question of the disper- sion of light, and in conclusion have deduced a simple for- * Communicated by the Author: on this subject see also a preceding article by Mr. Tovey. Theory of the Dispersion of Light. . 25 mula expressing the relation between the length of a wave and the velocity of its propagation. In a paper in the Phi- losophical Transactions for 1835, Part L, I have exhibited the results of calculation by means of this formula, by which theory is compared with observation for all the cases determined by M. Fraunhofer, and it will, I believe, be admitted that the ac- cordance is as close as can be reasonably expected. Since that paper was printed I have been indebted to Pro- fessor Sir W. R. Hamilton for bringing to my notice the cir- cumstance that the formula as there deduced, owing to certain assumptions made in the course of the investigation, is not absolutely rigorous, although under conditions which may be easily admitted as likely to subsist it is reduced to the form which I have used. ‘The state of the case will be rendered evident from the following considerations. In order to simplify the investigation M. Cauchy adopts the method of supposing an expression, which really consists of the sum of a series of analogous terms, reduced to a single term; upon this he pursues his inferences with respect to it, and then in the conclusion recurs to the summation again. The complete resulting expression would represent the mo- tions of an entire system, considered as produced by the com- bination of many, or even an infinity of, similar motions, each represented by the simplified equations obtained with the omission of the sign of summation. This will be understood on a comparison of those parts of my abstract which intro- duce equations (21.) and (56.). On the same supposition I have proceeded to that deduction which leads to the formula expressing the relation between the length of a wave and the refractive index. (See p. 265, Lond. and Edin. Phil. Mag., April 1835.) ; The formula thus deduced, in its simplified shape, viz. \- (2 at Lala sin (9) = ~ (eau ~ is obtained by collecting together into one constant (H/’) the sum of a number of terms of analogous forms which com- pose the values of the coefficients L, M, &c. Now if we recur to the expressions from which these values were originally derived, the equations (22.) and (12.), (or in the original memoir, more explicitly, equation (20.),) we shall readily per- ceive that the values of these coefficients in their exact form (that is, retaining the sign of summation,) are such as these: Third Series. Vol. 8. No. 43. Jan. 1836. E 26 Prof. Powell’s further Observations on M. Cauchy’s L = S {F (m, 1, «) « > (A, 7 cos) }, &c. = &e. Whence we should derive 4s = s{ (F (m,7,«) + F (m,r, B) +, &c.).$ (kyr, cos) } 5 Hence by the same process as that employed before, we may obtain a corresponding abridged expression ‘hee Tae ) x (—) =8}@)(— Sx e eG 2 To perceive more clearly the difference between the exact and approximate expressions, we may first observe, that since we have from equations (19.) and (45.) k 7 ne and 7 cos 8 = Ag, E Sei s Ao. the arc which is involved in the formula becomes - el Now, if we take the simplified formula, develope the sine in terms of the arc, and divide by the arc, we shall have Thee 1 ;Ag.ny? WR Ne oe ‘ eee ee easy | whereas the exact formula, in the same way, would give 1 wate 1 S[(H") (M7) 7 aire. {1-2 = S(EE) oe) 120 ee pRtee supposing the series to converge rapidly enough. Now, this would manifestly be the same as the last if we were at liberty to suppose spans (287)"] = psaay) [227], and similarly in the other terms: in which case we should Theory of the Dispersion of Light. 27 only have a common multiplier for the whole series, which would be represented by H'. Now this supposition would be the same as that of S [(H®) (Ag)] = (S (HP) (Ag) for the same value of A; or, since A g is the difference in per- pendicular distance from a given plane, of the molecule at the point vy = at the end of the time ¢, it will be evident, on a little consideration, that to disregard the sign of summa- tion altogether corresponds to taking into account only the action of two adjacent molecules. If again we apply it only to H* (as in owr simplified formula), without regarding Ae as variable, this is equivalent to considering only the ac- tion of two adjacent parallel strata of molecules, for all of ae which Ag isthe same. But if i) be small, and the series A : : : consequently converge rapidly, (=") being still of sensible magnitude, we may suppose that this is not far from the truth. I will not, however, say more with regard to the analysis of the theory at present, as the subject has been taken up by Sir W. R. Hamilton, with whose researches Gn systems of rays, in fact, the other parts of M. Cauchy’s investigations are closely connected. My abstract has been restricted to so much of those investigations as refers directly to the subject of the dispersion; but the entire theory, of which it forms a part, embraces the curious and beautiful discussion of wave surfaces: and the connexion and analogy of some of the most important of these results with his own researches are speci- ficially pointed out by the Irish Astronomer Royal in his third Supplement to the Theory of Systems of Rays in the Trans- actions of the Royal Irish Academy, vol. xvii. p. 125 and 141. Since this paper went to the press, that eminent mathematician has kindly given me permission to make what use I please of some further investigations on the subject of the dispersion- formula, including its numerical applications, which he had communicated to me. I hope, therefore, in a subsequent Number of this Journal to give some account of these im- portant researches, The development of the value of fe) in a series of powers of A, in a form available for the actual comparison of theory with observation, vy the use of a peculiar method for determin- ing the coefficients, appears also to have been lately investigated by M. Cauchy. His “ Eercices de Mathématique,” which, as | stated in a former paper, were broken off abruptly in 1830, have now been resumed, and are in the course of publication EK 2 98 Mr. Rose’s Sketch of the Geology of West Norfolk. at Prague, under the title of “Nouveaux Exercices,” &c. They will contain the continuation of the theory of dispersion, and the development in a form adapted to calculation. The di- stinguished author also has recently produced a memoir on interpolation, by a new method, which in conclusion he briefly applies (but without sufficient explanation) to the cal- culation of the refractive indices, in one instance of flint glass from Fraunhofer. One thing, however, is clear, viz. that from the close accord- ance between all the results which I have calculated (by the approximate formula) and those of observation, viz. the ten sets of indices obtained by Fraunhofer, and since that, ten other sets determined by M. Rudberg (very recently com- municated to the Royal Society*), it is sufficiently evident that at least for all these cases the approximate supposition is as near the truth as, perhaps, will be thought sufficient, when all circumstances are considered. It is, however, still quite conceivable that the differences, minute as they are, may be accounted for by a more accurate prosecution of the analysis. Again, it remains to be seen whether in other cases, especially those of more highly di- spersive media, the same method will still apply, or whether we must have recourse to a more complex investigation, which shall yet include, as a simplified case, the formula which holds good for media of low dispersive power. = + 1X. A Sketch of the Geology of West Norfolk. By C. B. Rose, Fellow of the Royal Medical and Chirurgical Society of Lon- don. (Continued from vol. vii. p. 376, and concluded. } Diluvium.— CiLsy, sand, or gravel of varying thickness, and frequently alternating beds of these substances, are found immediately incumbent on the chalk, and obscure in many places its outcrop, as they also do that of the gawlz, lower greensand, and clays of Marshland+. These irregular beds, alternating with each other, without any order of superposition, have received the name of diluvium ; but itis so difficult to de- termine what has been deposited by diluvial agency, in other * So long ago as 1827 we received and inserted in Phil. Mag. and Annals, N.S., vol. ii. p. 401, a paper on the undulatory theory of disper- sion from M. Rudberg. Has this been lost sight of in the recent investi- gations of the subject ? Some of the calculated numerical results obtained by M. Rudberg, we observe, are identical with those obtained by Professor Powell, as given in Phil. Trans, 1835, pp. 252, 254.—Epir. + The diluvium in Marshland is covered by a considerable thickness of alluvial deposits. Mr. Rose’s Sketch of the Geology of West Norfolk. 29 words, by the mighty debacle, and what was deposited by the usual currents found in large basins of water, into which huge rivers emptied themselves, that, with our present knowledge, in My opinion, we cannot apportion the effects due to each agent. ‘That the clays, particularly, are composed of trans- ported materials there cannot be a question, for the chalk which forms the substratum of the greater part of western and central Norfolk could not furnish the blue clay so fre- quently met with upon it: not only this, the boulders, so abundantly found in the clay, inclose organic remains which enable us to determine that their parent rocks are si- tuated fifty, nay hundreds of miles apart from them. With- out noticing the fragments of primitive rocks (which are more difficult to identify, in consequence of their not containing organic remains), I may particularize boulders from the old red sandstone, mountain limestone, alum-shale of Whitby, blue lias, cornbrash limestone, Septaria of the Oxford and Kimme- ridge clays, &c., all inclosing animal exuvize that indubitably determine from what strata they were disrupted. As many of these boulders weigh some hundreds of pounds, indeed, some tons*, it is fair to infer that no common current or torrent could have impelled them to their present sites, making every allowance for time; indeed, the magnitude of some of them, the distance they must have travelled, and the want of order in the arrangement of the clay, sand, and gravel, all combine to render it highly probable that the transport of these ma- terials could not have been effected by any other agent than the Noachian Deluge. The light lands covering the outcrop of the chalk abound in bleached fragments of flint, the debris of the abraded chalk; these fragments are in many places (as around Castleacre) so abundant, that it is found necessary to pick them from the and about once in four years, to the amount sometimes of two loads (24 bushels to the load) per acre. The clay of the heavy \ands is either yellow or blue: the former contains a large proportion of calcareous matter, and in it large fractured flints predominate, with their angles sharp; the blue clay is in a much greater degree argillaceous, and is also remarkable for the abundance of boulders of the oolitic series of rocks, having all their angles rounded. The gravel beds are prin- cipally composed of fragments (in the form of pebbles) of al- most every member of the series of rocks, from granite up- wards, with every angle effaced, manifestly the result of long exposure to attrition, ; In some situations, as is exemplified on Necton Common * A boulder of breccia in a clay-pit at Fouldon, south of Swaffham, weighs several tons. 30 Mr. Rose’s Sketch of the Geology of West Norfolk. near Swaffham, the gravel beds contain so large a quantity of decomposing iron pyrites, that the water percolating the gravel is sufficiently charged with iron to cement the sand and stony fragments together, and form a coarse breccia. Under similar circumstances, the water of some springs has a considerable ferruginous impregnation : at Thetford a chaly- beate spring occurs, containing also carbonate of soda and free carbonic acid, with a proportion of zvon not inferior to that of Tunbridge Wells, although it flows from a very dif- ferent source; the elaboratory of ow chalybeate being situated in the diluvial beds, and the decomposition of iron pyrites from the disrupted chalk strata affording the ferruginous in- gredient. Fragments of calcareous tufa are occasionally met with in these beds. i Being desirous of not extending this paper beyond the li- mits of a periodical, I forbear noticing the ceconomical and agricultural purposes to which these beds are applied; and for the same reason I shall refer your readers to Mr. Samuel Woodward’s Geology of Norfolk* for a list of the antedilu- vian organic remains, which are, for the most part, inclosed in boulders. The only mammalian remains I have seen are, part of a tusk of Elephas primigenius found at Hunstanton, teeth and vertebrae of Elephas Indicus from beneath the brick-earth at Narford, and part of a tooth of the Mastodon latidens? found in a gravel-pit at Swaffham. It is worthy of notice, that the parent strata from which the boulders must have been originally detached are all si- tuated to the north and the west of our county. Alluvium. —The first deposit I shall notice under this head has received the name of * Brick-earth of the Nar,” from my having (till very recently) found it only in the valley through which that river takes its course. In this valley I have traced it west and east from Watlington through East Winch and West Bilney to Narford, a distance of nine miles. It occupies low grou d, except at its inland extremity, where it rises to about eig"ty feet above the level of the Nar. Mr. Arthur Young in his “ Agricultural Survey of Nor- folk,” speaking of this deposit, under the article “* Manure Oyster Shells,” says, “In East Winch and West Bilney, and scattered for ten miles to Wallington (Watlington ?), there is a remarkable bed of oyster-shells in sea mud: the farmers use them at the rate of ten loads an acre for turnips, which are a very good dressing; they are of particular efficacy on land * An Outline of the Geology of Norfolk, page 39, “ Clay of Western Norfolk,” Mr. Rose’s Sketch of the Geology of West Norfolk. 31 worn out by corn. * * * * * ‘They are found within two feet of the surface, and as deep as they have dug, water having stopped them at sixteen or eighteen feet deep. They fall into powder on being stirred.” The clay inclosing the shells is of a slate blue colour, and upon drying falls into laminz ; it contains numerous spangles of mica, and in the lower part of the bed at Winch and Bil- ney there is a considerable admixture of sand. It has a very muddy smell when first opened, and the water which rises from it is too offensive to be used for culinary purposes. No boulders have been found in it. At West Bilney it is generally covered by two or more feet of earth, consisting of vegetable soil, and yellow sandy loam, containing small pebbles and angular fragments of flint. The yellow loam burns into a red brick; a portion lying be- tween the loam and the blue clay, and probably a mixture of the two, produces a mottled brick; and the blue clay, usually denominated the brick-earth, becomes a fine white brick. At another part of the brick-yard bleached shells, chiefly Turri- tella Terebra and Mactra subtruncata, are found immediately beneath the vegetable soil in white sand: the same shells are also scattered through the brick-earth, with Ostrea edulis, Ros- tellaria Pes Pelecani, &c. At this locality a well was sunk to the depth of forty feet, and Ostree and Rostellarie were still brought up; but the oysters were most abundant at the depth of three or four feet from the surface. ‘Two fragments of the grinding teeth of the Oz, and small portions of bone, were also found in the blue clay, at the depth of five feet. At East Walton, Ostree, Turbo littoreus, and fragments of a Pecten are turned up by the plough; in a pit they may also be seen imbedded in a light-coloured alluvial clay, rising abruptly from the valley of the Nar to the height of eighty feet above the level of the river: the shells are much more broken than those found in the blue clay, situated at a lower level ; indeed, in the latter situation but few are at all injured. At Walton Stocks the same shells were also found. At Narford, near the Hall, in the same fetid blue clay as at Bilney, Ostrea, accompanied by Rostellaria, were discovered beneath a considerable bed of sand and loam; the clay was sunk through at the depth of twenty-seven feet, and in its lowest portion teeth and vertebree of the Asiatic Elephant were found: this is the most inland extremity of this deposit at present detected. The shells of the same deposit have also been found at a brick-yard in East Winch, covered by seven feet of sand and loam: beneath these lie a light-coloured ar- gillaceous earth, six feet in thickness, containing a few shells, which reposes upon the blue clay, in which the Ostree, Ros- $2 Mr. Rose’s Sketch of the Geology of West Norfolk. tellarie, &c. are very abundant; the blue clay has here been opened to the depth of ten feet. Very recently have been dis- covered at this spot, in the loam, fragments of a tooth and bones of an elephant, and a broken tooth of a rhinoceros. In the middle of the village of East Winch, by the side of the road leading to Lynn, Ostree and Rostellarie were dis- covered on sinking a well; and on Mr. Forster’s farm, in the same parish, similar shells were found. At Tottenhill brick-yard, a short distance from the road leading from Lynn to Downham, and at Watlington, the same bed of blue clay is met with, inclosing similar shells to those at West Bilney. The same kind of blue clay was opened last summer about. half a mile to the south of Middleton ‘Tower, in a valley run- ning parallel to that of the Nar, and separated from it by the high ground on which the village of Middleton stands; a small stream takes its course through this valley, emptying itself, as the Nar does, into the Ouse at Lynn. Ostrea edulis and Turbo littoreus were found six feet below the surface. In some localities, with the Ostree have been found Cardia, Mactra, and other shells, of which the following is a list. The greater number of the oysters are large, thick, and antiquated ; they and the Rostellarie are very abundant; Natica glaucina is next in abundance; Pecten and Cerithium are scarce. The shells have not suffered by attrition, but few are broken, and none of them are mineralized. Organic Remains. Name. Reference. Locality. Vermilia triquetra ...... Brown’s lllust., pl. 2.f.1,5. [On Ostrez, W. Bilney. Cardium echinatum ...) —————-—_ pl. 21. East Winch. STEGIUC .sseeasteaee Wood’s Conch., pl. 55. f. 4.) Ditto. Ditto. Corbula Nucleus ......... Brown’s Illust., pl. 14. f.6,9.| W. Bilney. Mactra subtruncata......) —————-— _ pl. 15. f. 7. Ditto. E. Winch. SOLIdA; 05s o0deee Penn. Brit. Zool., pl.55.f.2.| Ditto. Ostrea edulis ............ Brewn’s Illust., pl. 31. f.19.) Do. Narford, &c. Pecten varius ... a tr eae Zo0k la Do. Walton. Tellina,young specimens), species undetermined. W. Bilney. Cerithium reticulatum | Geol. Norf., t.1. f. 2. W. Bilney. Turritella Terebra ... —_— Buccinun: reticulatum Brown’s Illust., pl. 51. f. 56. Min. Conch., t. 565. f. 3. Penn. Brit. Zool., pl. 75. f. 2. } Do. _E. Winch. Ditto. Turbo littoreus ......... Brown’s Illust., pl. 46 f.1,9.| Do. Do. Walton. Rostellaria Pes Pele- | | Penn.Brit.Zool.vol.iii.pl.78. D Do.. & ee eas } Sow. Min. Con., t. 558. f. 1. } tae Rae Natica glaucina ......... Brown’s Illust., pl. 43. Do. Do. BIOS; TCCEDION, .cichs «steven ee ea cain ia an Ditto. Elephas Indicus, teeth and vertebrz of. Narford. E. Winch. Rhinoceros, fragments of a molar tooth of the lower \E Winch MAW Tithe teas ly be atte os or anebrewserse cheeks. tle ; 3 * Dr. Buckland’s Reliquie Diluviane, pl. 7. fig. 6. Mr. Rose’s Sketch of the Geology of West Norfolk. 38 We have here shown, that within the valley of the Nar there occurs an extensive deposit of mud, containing marine shells, the living congeners of which inhabit the adjoining sea. The accompanying map (vol. vii. Plate I.) of the ground oc- cupied by this deposit is a portion copied from the Ordnance map, and exhibits the high grounds bounding the valleys. I have affixed the various localities where the shells have been found, to render my account more intelligible, and to show the extent and course of the deposit. The shells have at present been found on the north side of the valley only, except at Tottenhill and Watlington; they have not been met with on the south side (the present course of the Nar) beyond Wor- megay, but occupy the low ground to the north and east of the elevated patch of carstone on which Bilney Lodge stands, and are-again found in the valley of the Nar at Narford. The general level of that portion of the brick-earth in which the oyster-shells are most congregated is not much above low-water mark at Lynn; at the Bilney brick-yard they are about seventeen feet above it. ‘Their elevation to the extreme height (about 100 feet) at which they are found at East Walton was probably effected by spring tides in conjunction with storms casting them upon the shore of the creek (presuming this valley to have been once a creek of a sea): the fractured state of the shells and the high angle of their elevation at this locality will, I conceive, justify such an inference; indeed, the equinoctial gales, which here blow with great violence from the west, and consequently cowards Walton, would impel waves with corresponding force up this very acclivity. We are therefore led to infer that this valley was, at a re- mote period, occupied by the waters of the ocean: upon ex- amining the accompanying map, and observing the relative si- tuations of it and the estuary called the Wash, it will be seen that the embouchure of the former is in the direction of the latter; and when we bear in mind that there is a process of filling up constantly in progress in all estuaries, and that our estuary, therefore, must once have extended much higher into Marshland, we cannot doubt that the valley of the Nar ata former period opened directly into the estuary, and that the ocean’s waves flowed freely into the valley, forming an ex- tensive creek, bounded by the high grounds of North Runc- ton, Middleton, and East Winch on the north; those of Wal- ton, Westacre, and Narford on the east; and of Marham, Shouldham, and Tottenhill on the south. I think it not at all improbable that similar deposits of mud and shells to those of the Nar and Middleton Tower may hereafter be discovered in the valleys of South Wooton Third Series. Vol. 8. No. 43. Jan. 1836. F 34 Mr. Rose’s Sketch of the Geology of West Norfolk. and Castle Rising; indeed, on the road leading from Lynn to Hunstanton, there are many visible indications of a resi- dence of the sea upon lands now raised to an elevation be- yond the reach of the highest tides. At Dersingham Heath and at Ingoldisthorpe it is not difficult to trace at various points terraces parallel to the shore of the Wash, raised by the waves of the flowing tide, and troughs and gulleys formed: by the retiring waters of ebb tide. ‘The adjoining marshes are considerably below the level of high tide, and are pro- tected from inundation by embankments. It is probable that the elevation of the strata at Hunstan- ton Cliff (rising about fifteen yards in a mile), continued along the eastern shore of the Wash, mainly contributed to the ex- clusion of the salt water from the valley of the Nar, and that it was further reclaimed by the silting up of the upper part of the estuary, and the embankments constructed by man. As this brick-carth is nowhere covered by transported ma- terials inclosing boulders of distant strata, we must consider it to be a post-diluvian deposit*. Ancient Beach.—At Hunstanton, manifestations of a great change in the relative level of the sea and the present cliff exist. I paid a visit to this interesting spot last summer, and whilst examining the greensand stratum at a part considerably beyond the point where the incumbent red chalk crops out (the least attractive portion of the cliff), I discovered traces of an ancient beach composed of rounded fragments of red and white chalk, immediately reposing upon the greensand, and covered by 93-feet of sandy loam, containing small angular fragments of flint. ‘The weather came on so stormy and wet, which continued during my stay, that I could not then carry further my examination. At the spot I examined, the old * The following are references to deposits of the same epoch: ‘‘Recent shells resting on the out-goings of the floetz strata in Clackmananshire,” as stated by Mr. Bald, in Mem.Werner. Soc., vol. i. p. 403;—‘ Marine shells found in the line of the Ardrossan canal,” by Capt. Laskey, Mem. Wern. Soc., vol. iv. part li. p. 568;—‘* Marine shells of existing species on the left bank of the Mersey, and above the level of high-water mark,” discovered by J.'lrimmer, Esq.; vide Proceedings of Geol. Society of London, vol. i. p. 419;—the occurrence of similarly situated shells near Preston in Lan- cashire, as stated by Mr. Gilbertscn, and confirmed by R. I. Murchison, Esq., who likewise observed “ similar phenomena over a very considerable tract of country occupying the ancient estuary of the Ribble;” vide Pro- ceedings Geol. Soc. Lond., vol. i. p. 365, 366.; [also Phil. Mag. and An- nals, N.S., vol. xi. p. 366.—Enrv. ] ;—and “ Description of a bed of recent marine shells near Elie on the southern coast of Fifeshire, by W. J. Hamil- ton, Esq., Sec. Geol. Soc., read March 11, 1835. [Lond. and Edinb, Phil. Mag., vol. vii. p. 318.] In imitation of the technical language of Mr. Lyell, the period of these deposits may be termed the pascene, from ras omnis, and xesvoc recens, all the shells being of recent species. Mr. Rose’s Sketch of the Geology of West Norfolk. 35 beach is immediately incumbent on the breccia of the green- sand, five feet above the level of the present beach, and rises towards the east from Lynn bay ; consequently it inclines in an opposite direction to the regular strata. I purpose taking the earliest opportunity of prosecuting my research into this in- teresting relic of * olden time,” to trace its course and extent, and particularly to explore it for testaceous exuviz ; at present none have been seen. Mr. E. Mugridge, at my request, has endeavoured to trace the course of the old beach, and thinks it rises to the surface at a part of the cliff which is about 40 feet high. Alluvium of Marshland.—Marshland is part of the Bedford Level, forms the western boundary of this county, and con- tains about 63,000 acres of low-Jand. It is geologically com- posed of alternating beds of lacustrine silt and peat (covering, in the immediate vicinity of Lynn, a marine silt), lying upon a stiff clay inclosing small nodules of chalk, the whole re- posing on the Oxford clay. The various canals and dikes cut for inland navigation and for the drainage of the Level have exposed the beds above mentioned. ‘lhe following are the sectzons I have been able to procure. At Salter’s Lode, near Downham, “ the silt was observed to be ten feet deep; and next below that, three feet thicknesse of firm moor; then bluish gault, which the work- men judged to have been silt originally, because being dry, it not only crumbled, like it, but had the roots of reeds in it; then below it moor of three feet thicknesse, much firmer and clearer than the other; and lastly, whitish clay, which is sup- posed to have been the very natural and bottome soyle at the first, before those changes happened, either from the altera- tion of the course of the sea, or choaking up of these out- falls” * . In making the Eau-brink Cut near Lynn the beds were found arranged in the following manner: 1. Vegetable soil, and brown clay with sand... ... 4 ft. 2. Blue clay, a brick-earth =... 2. ee nee wee 8 3. Peat, containing bones and horns of ru- othe vi) SE I eee eer Sa Sea } 0% Blue clay, similar to No.2. ... 0 20. see eee ae 8 . Peat, with alder and hazel bushes; the lower seth, 3 tion clay, containing roots of marsh plants ... . Dark blue clay, a marine silt, containing the fol- lowing shells in great abundance: Cardium edule, Mytilus edulis, Tellina solidula, Lutraria com- * nn for) * Dugdale on Embanking, &c. Edit. 1662, page 178. I 2 36 Mr. Rose’s Sketch of the Geology of West Norfolk. pressa, and Turbo ulve; this bed was not cut through*. In the beds Nos. 2 and 4, fluviatile shells were found: the smaller ones appear to have been overlooked by the labourers, but Anodons were noticed, and were found interspersed throughout both beds; in No. 2. they were abundant, forming a layer immediately upon the peat, No. 3. The shells from No. 6. are certainly not of the same era as those of the brick-earth of the Nar; they are evidently of a more recent date, and resemble those now existing in the river at Lynn. At Mr. Allen’s well, in the town of Lynn, similar alluvial strata to those at Eau-brink were met with, and were imme- diately succeeded by a bed of blue clay containing nodules of chalk, between 20 and 30 feet in thickness, which we consider to be diluvium. For the section of the alluvium at Denver Sluice see a former part of this paper, vol. vii. p.173. By the above sections we are informed of, and are enabled to arrange, the succession of changes to which Marshland has been exposed. Commencing with the period of the irruption of the sea, and its residence in Marshland, during which the marine exuvie discovered in making the Eau-brink Cut were deposited, we learn next that this district became a marsh, in which alders, hazels, and marsh plants vegetated. Its next change was inundation by fresh wa- ter, forming a lake inhabited by freshwater Testacea, a transi- tion probably effected by obstruction to the outlet of the rivers of the great level, from bars thrown up by the tidal waves in the estuary now called the Wash; this state continued till the deposition of eight feet of mud had elevated its surface, and, with the aid of other natural forces, burst its barrier; again the waters escaped, leaving, perhaps, but a solitary river to drain the interior ; again aquatic plants took possession of the surface, and from the occurrence of large trees in the peat (No. 3.), forests of oak and other trees indigenous to this island sprang up, encompassed by brush-wood of hazel, alder, &c. This was the state of the fens at the period of the Roman invasion; and after the invaders had established their authority in the country, they commenced embanking this district, to protect it from the inroads of the sea }: itis said, that the Emperor Se- * Marine silt containing similar shells occurs in Lewes Levels. (Dr. Man- tell’s Geology, &c.) + Tacitas, in his life cf Agricola, says, “ the Britons complained that their hands and bodies were worn out and consumed by the Romans, in ~ clearing the woods, and embanking the fens.” Mr. Rose’s Sketch of the Geology of West Norfolk. 37 verus was the first to intersect the fens with causeways*. From the time that the Romans finally renounced the sovereignty of Britain, in the year 427, to the reign of Charles I., 1630, (when the drainage of the Jevel was projected by, and com- menced under the auspices of, the Earl of Bedford, being com- pleted by his son in 1653,) a period of 1203 years, its cultiva- tion was neglected, and it became a second time extensively inundated, its forests laid prostrate, and in process of time buried beneath lacustrine silt (No. 2, Kau-brink section); again the rivers flowed in natural channels +, and ultimately this morass, through the enterprise and skill of man, is reclaimed, and the Bedford Level emerges a fertile tract of country. The coin of Charles II. and the pair of scissors met with in the excavation at Denver Sluice (vol. vii. page 173.) must have been found at a spot that had been previously opened, for the bed of peat No. 4. could not have been formed at so late a period. Many smal] formations of peat and deposits of silt are found on the margins of the rivulets, and in the small basins occurring on the surface of the dzlwvium; these contain the shells of existing amd indigenous species of fluviatile Testacea. Horns and bones of a species of elk, stag, and other mam- malia are found imbedded in the peat. Submarine Forest.—We possess but little information re- specting the submarine forest off the coast of Norfolk. « A forest seems to have extended from the coast of Lin- colnshire a considerable way along the Norfolk coast, as there is on the shore near Thornham, at low water, the appearance of a large forest having been at some period interred and swallowed up by the waves. Stools of numerous large timber trees, and many trunks are to be seen, but so rotten, that they may be penetrated by a spade. ‘These lie in a black mass of vegetable fibres, consisting of decayed branches, leaves, rushes, flags, &c.t Also, off Hunstanton and Brancaster, at ebb tide, a bank of mud inclosing trunks and branches of * Dugdale mentions one, “supposed to have been made by him of 24 miles in length, extending from Denver to Peterborough ; this was com- posed of gravel about three feet in depth, and sixty feet broad ; it was dis- covered beneath a covering of moor from three to five feet in thickness.” Other works of art have also been found beneath the moor at various places in the great level. + “In the year 870, the Danes (then Pagans) led by Inguar and Ubba, made an incursion into this realm, and destroyed it (the religious house at Ely): for such was the depth of the waters, which compassing this isle extended to the sea, that they had an easy access unto it by shipping.’— Dugdale, Edit. 1772, page 181. { Philosophical Transactions, No. 481, and Beauties of England and Wales, vol. xi. p. 94. 38 Mr. Rose’s Sketch of the Geology of West Norfolk. trees is seen. Mr. S. Woodward notices the above forest under the head of ** Lacustrine formations,” and says, ‘ ‘The ligneous deposit on Brancaster beach comes under this head, and deserves our particular notice. In_this locality, trunks of trees are found abundantly imbedded in the mud; and at low water, the proprietors of the land thereabouts remove them by means of a team of horses, and convert them into posts and fences, or use them for similar purposes; the wood being quite sound, and not in the least impregnated by the soil in which they have been imbedded. With these are found the horns and bones of the deer and ox, in excellent preservation* .” Mr. R. C. Taylor, speaking of the subterranean forest, says, ** Doubtless this must be the southern extremity of that sub- marine forest which has long engaged the notice of geologists, on the north-west part of Norfolk, whence it is traced across the Wash and the fens of Cambridgeshire to Peterborough, and all along the Lincolnshire coast, as far as the Humber. There is no important variation in the general level of this woody tract. As relates to the Norfolk portion, it appears so closely in connexion with the crag formation, as almost to form a part of it: the shells of the one being occasionally mixed with the vegetable matter of the other ; and are further accompanied by bones of stags, elephants, and oxen +.” Mr. Taylor writes thus of its situation near Cromer: “ It is not possible to say how far inland this subterranean forest ex- tends, but that it is not a mere external belt is obvious from the constant exposure and removal of new portions, at the base of the cliffs ;” and again, “ near Cromer, the trees are a few feet above the crag stratum, and are about the level of high water.” He also believes it to have been antediluvian, as we learn from the following reference to Dr. Alderson’s ** Geological Observations on the Vicinity of Hull and Be- verly ¢.” ‘Dr. Alderson in describing the geological charac- ters of that district (Holderness), many years ago, was of opi- nion that the diluvial hills were heaped upon the submarine forest. Nothing has arisen to discourage that idea; but it derives confirmation from the parallel case which is presented by the cliffs of Norfolk §.” Professor Lyell (evidently in reference to Mr. Taylor’s observations) expresses himself thus: ‘* After examining in 1829, the so-called submarine forest of Happisborough in * Outline of the Geology of Norfolk, p. 13. + Phil. Mag. and Annals, N.S., vol. i. p. 289. t Nicholson’s Philosophical Journal, 4to, vol. iii. 6 Phil. Mag. and Annals, N.S., vol,.i. p. 289. Mr. Rose’s Sketch of the Geology of West Norfolk. 39 Norfolk, I found that it was nothing more than a tertiary lig- nite of the ‘ crag’ period ; which becomes exposed in ihe bed of the sea as soon as the waves sweep away the superincum- bent strata of bluish clay*.” Mr. Bakewell makes the following remarks: “ But these subterranean forests in England deserve more attention than thev have hitherto received from geologists; the period of their growth, and the causes by which they were submerged, are at present unknown. A similar subterranean forest ex- tends into the sea on the coast of Flanders. Have these forests been once united, and afterwards separated by a subsidence, which formed the bed of the German Ocean +?” Dr. Alderson and Mr. Taylor appear to have considered these forests to have been antediluvian: I am not sure that I understand Professor Lyell on this subject; his Jignite, I am aware, is antediluvian, but in it, does he include “ large stools of trees, their stems, and branches” ? If the subterranean and submarine forests of the eastern coast be antediluvian, the sub- terranean forests of Marshland are not contemporaneous to them, but of a more recent period, for they, with the beds of peat, are invariably found above what is considered diluvial debris. On the date of this “once sylvan tract” I ought not to venture an opinion, for I have no personal acquaintance with it, never having had an opportunity of examining the spot; indeed, itis very difficult of access; and until it is determined upon what substratum the “ mud inclosing the vegetable mat- ter” is deposited, we cannot assign to the submarine forests their place in the scale of formations: still, I cannot consider this submarine forest (from the data connected with it already collected) to be contemporaneous with the lignite of the crag exposed in the cliff at Cromer, but believe it to be of the same epoch as the subterranean forest of the fens, and that its submergence was the result of the subsidence which formed the trough for the German Ocean. Recent writers evidently consider the subterranean forests to be postdiluvian: thus, Phillips writes, “ All the lacustrine deposits containing peat, which I have inspected in Holder- ness, agree in this general fact, that the peat does not rest im- mediately upon the diluvial formation beneath, but is sepa- rated from it by at least one layer of sediment, which is seldom without shells + .” * Principles of Geology, by C. Lyell, Esq., second edition, vol. ii. p. 273. + Bakewell’s Geology, 3rd edit. p. 513. t Ulustrations of the Geology of Yorkshire, by J. Phillips, Esq., p. 55. [See also Phil. Mag. and Annals, N,S,, vol, ix. p. 353,—Ebir. | 40 .Mr. Rose’s Sketch of the Geology of West Norfolk. Again: “The extensive accumulations of peat and trees, along the shores of the Humber and its tributary rivers, hap- pened, probably, at the same period of time as those which have contributed to fill up the ancient lakes of Holderness. This is inferred, with the highest probability of truth, from the position of the peat with respect to the diluvial clay and pebbles; for wherever these occur together, the former is in- variably uppermost * .” Dr. Fleming, describing a submarine forest in the Frith of Forth, tells us the peat reposes upon a lacustrine silt; and from the tenour of his remarks he evidently considers it to belong to the “ modern epoch +”. My observations on the alluvial phsenomena are brief, in consideration of the great length to which my communication had already extended. For much valuable information on the subject I refer those who feel an interest in the inquiry to two essays by the Rev. Dr. Fleming, published in the ‘Trans- actions of the Royal Society of Edinbugh, vol. ix. p. 419, and in the Quarterly Journal of Science, 1830, vol. vii. p. 21; and to Mr. R. C. Taylor’s communication to a former volume of this Magazine, entitled “ On the Natural Embankments formed against the German Ocean on the Norfolk and Suf- folk Coast, and the Silting up of some of its Astuaries* ”,— papers replete with instructive matter. Waving further speculation on the causes of the muta- tions to which the small area that I have examined has been subjected, I have in conclusion merely to state that in thus arranging and publishing my geological notes I have but re- sponded to an appeal made by Dr. Fitton, from the chair of the Geological Society at the Annual General Meeting of the Fellows in 1828, in the following words: ‘ But those who are deprived of the privilege of travelling even in England, must not suppose that they can be of no service as geologists ; or if they belong to our body, that they are thus released from their obligation to be active in our cause: and there are two descriptions of persons,—the resident clergy, and members of the medical profession in the country,—to whom what I am about to say may be more particularly deserving of attention. Such persons, if they have not yet acquired a taste for natural science, can hardly conceive the interest which the face of the country in their vicinity would gain, however unpromising it may appear, by their having such inquiries before them; how much the monotony of life in a remote or thinly inhabited * Illust. Geology of Yorkshire, p. 56. + Quarterly Journal of Science, vol. vii. 1830, p. 21. t Phil. Mae. and Annals, N.S., vol. ii. p. 295. Mr. Rose’s Sketch of the Geology of West Norfolk. 41 district would thus be relieved, nor how much benefit they might confer on the natural history of their country*.” Swaffham, May 5, 1835. Explanation of the Sections and Map. The sections do not give the relative proportions or true dip of the respective strata, but merely their order of super- position. Section at Hunstanton Cliff: Thickness. No. 1. Vegetable soil and diluvium. feet. inches. 2. Lower chalk, Lond. and Edinb. Phil. es 28 O Mag. vol. vil. page 275 ... se. ose 3. Chalk-marl, 7b. page 276, 2 ft. 6 in. to 3 0 4. White zoophytic bed, 76. page 181 ... 1 4—6 A thin seam of red argillaceous matter : ; : 0 2—S8 occurs in this place, 2b. page 181 ... 5. Red zoophyticlimestone in two beds, fee : : - 3 10 equivalent of the gault, 7b. page 181 zane greensand. Carstone, 2d. Eee gis 8. Sandy breccia, 7b. page 176... ve 14 0 x The dotted line points out the course of the ancient beach. For these admeasurements I am indebted to Mr. E. Mug- gridge of Lynn; they were taken at the highest part of the cliff. Mr. Richard C. Taylor’s statement of the greatest depth ex- posed of each stratum is published with his section in the Philosophical Magazine, vol. Ixi. 1823. * Proceedings of the Geological Society of London, vol. i. p. 60,—[also Phil. Mag. and Annals, N.S., vol. iii. p. 299.—Ebrv. ] Third Series. Vol. 8. No. 43, Jan. 1836. G. 42 Mr. Rose’s Sketch of the Geology of West Norfolk. Section from Lynn to Swaffham. a. Alluvium. No. 1. Vegetable soil and diluvium; 2. Chalk with flints ; 3. Chalk without flints, including chalk-marl; 4. Gault ; 5. Inferior greensand; 6. Kimmeridge clay; 7. Oxford clay. H. Hardwick Tollgate; M. Middleton; E. W. East Winch; B. West Bilney; N. Narborough; S. Swaffham. Map of the Valley of the Nar, &c. (vol. vii. Plate I.) The map exhibits the localities of the shells of the brick- earth; the course of the deposit, described page 33, will be readily traced upon it. The marks (™) show the situation of the quarries of carstone, and the spots where the brick-earth is dug. The dotted line across the map traces the course of the gault, and serves to correct the West Norfolk portion of the Geological Map published by the authority of the Geological Society, as regards the course of the inferior greensand, which is made to approach too near Swaffham : referring to the ac- companying map, the inferior greensand occurs to the west of the dotted line only; and to the east of it are the chalk strata. Note.—Since my paper was sent to the Editors, I have verified my antici- pations (vol. vii. p. 181.) respecting the extent inland of the red chalk of Hunstanton cliff. Having expressed my opinion to Mr. Durrant of Sand- ringham that the red chalk extended to West Newton (the village in which the valley of blue gault commences), that gentleman informed me he had seen it opened in that part of his parish immediately adjoining to West Newton. I took an early opportunity of examining the spot myself, and had the satisfaction of seeing its outcrop, which lies in adirect line with the strike of the blue gault; and I collected some of its characteristic Belemnites, which were very abundant. Mr. Durrant also informed me that it occurs at Ingoldisthorpe; and Mr. E. Muggridge has recently stated to me that it nas been sunk through in making a well at Dersingham Mill; therefore its course from the coast to its junction with the d/ue gault is now pretty well traced throughout.—Sept. 11, 1835.] [ 43 ] X. On the Theory of Congeneric Surd Equations. By W.G. Horner, Esq. (Ina Letter addressed to T. S. Davies, Esq., F.RS. L. & E.)* [If those mathematicians who have met with a quadratic equation + whose “roots” either under a real or imaginary forin could not be exhibited, will recall to memory the surprise with which they viewed the circum- stance, and the attempts which they made to solve the mystery, they will read with no ordinary gratification the following discussion of the general question of which this formsa part. The general theory of such equations, very happily named by Mr. Horner “ Congeneric Equations,” is here laid dewn with great clearness, and, so far as I know, for the first time,—as it is, indeed, nearly the first time the formation of any general and philosophic views respecting them has been attempted. The following letter was drawn up in answer to some passages in one which I had a short time previvusly addressed to Mr. Horner, and was a private and friendly communication; yet I have sincere pleasure in having obtained his permission to publish it in the Phil. Mag. I do so under the conviction that it will furnish the same satisfaction to others that it has done to me. J shall only add in conclusion my hope that the inquiry which, in the close of his letter, he has assigned to me, will be pursued by himself, as I know no man to whom such researches can be so safely and successfully referred. Royal Military Academy, Nov. 15, 1835. aS: D:] My pear Sir, I AGREE with you in thinking that the properties of irra- tional equations have not received that degree or kind of attention from writers on the elements of algebra, which was due either to the importance of the subject, or to a considera- tion for the comfort of young students. This appears the more extraordinary, because the methods of clearing an equation from irrational expressions, whether involving the unknown or not, have been so fully discussed, that really very little remained to be done for rendering the state of the whole case very intelligible. Waring (Med. Alg., Prob. 26.) may be cited as a case in point. But “a miss is as good as a mile.” In solving equations involving radicals every one has experienced the necessity of putting his results to the proof before he could venture to decide which of them, or whether any of them, could be trusted; but as the latter alternative, or the failure of every result, is of rare occurrence in books of * Communicated by Mr. Davies. 4+ For instance, 27 + ,/x*—7 = 5, the “roots” of which are 4 and 8 as determined by the common process; neither of which substituted in the equation reduces it to zero, These are the roots of its congeneric surd equation 2a— f/er—7 =5, . G2 44° Mr. W.G. Horner on Congeneric Surd Equations. exercises, because, no doubt, the compilers had not thought the matter out, we who use their collections, being as in- dolent as they, have contented ourselves with the general probability of, at least, partial success. In the mean time even classical writers have spoken of clearing an equation from radicals, in order to its solution, as a process of course, and which would not in any way affect the conditions. The consequence is, that a habit prevails of talking about equations without any regard to this peculiar case, and therefore in language which when applied to it becomes quite incorrect. The term root of an equation passes for synonymous with any quantity which, being substituted for the unknown, satisfies the conditions; and it is affirmed, and demonstrated, that every equation has at least one root; and that, having one, it must have as many roots as there are units in the greatest index attached to the unknown. It is therefore ‘quite start- ling, when we are reminded that equations may be proposed ad libitum, whose conditions cannot be satisfied by any quan- tity, positive, negative, or imaginary; that notwithstanding this, the roots obtained from such equations may be real quan- tities. Nor is the enigma solved by discovering that the roots obtained from one equation are sure to satisfy the conditions of another, not much unlike it: on the contrary, one is quite displeased at this kind of thimble-rig shuffling, where we were assured of finding truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. A logician of the old school would settle the business by crying ‘ distinguo” ; but we should still reply, that it is a lame distinction which clears up only one half of the pre- mises: we know that these are surd equations we are now speaking of, and that just before we were speaking of rational equations, or equations cleared of surds; but the difficulty remains unexplained. If he really knew a little of the sub- ject, he would, perhaps, next try the pass-word ambiguity : ** There is always a certain ambiguity adhering to surd ex- pressions.” When, however, the most is said that can be said to that purport, it amounts in short to this, that in the reading of formulz, when we meet with a radical, we ought not to use the definite but the indefinite article. We have a knack of saying “the”, where we ought to say “a”, that is all; and if we did but read a square root, a cube root, and so on, we should be certain of finding one that would satisfy the ex- isting conditions. ‘This sounds plausibly, and at least ninety- nine out of every hundred of algebraists would inquire no further; but you would perhaps object, that at this rate + ¥«ex= — ¥ x might be a good equation, unless, with Mr. W.G. Horner on Congeneric Surd Equations. 45 Lindley Murray, we admit the “the” when the same quantity appears a second time under the same radical; and that without a greater latitude still, we should never be able to prove that + YW w—ax—W x+a made —¥V x*—a’*, and so on. So that the professed ambiguity is subject, after all, to a conventional permanence. The source of the whole mystery, in my judgement, is to be found in the almost unavoidable imperfection of the man- ner in which we are taught to transform equations when we are at school. The operations consequent on /ransposition are correct as far as their principles are resolvable into Eu- clidian axioms. Beyond that they are liable to fallacy; and, generally speaking, we are infallible in our judgement only as long as every term is on one side. We may then deter- mine satisfactorily i in what cases zero is admissible as the ag- gregate value. An instance of the hazard attending the neg- lect of this principle is given in my paper in the ‘Lond. and Edinb. Phil. Mag. for September 1834, (vol.v.) p. 189. In the management of surds, instances might easily be accumulated. And whence this hazard? and why consequent upon trans- position? Because, from the nature of analysis, we are con- tinually arguing from the direct to the converse. An equa- tion is formed hypothetically. We trace out certain direct con- sequences, in the form of equations also, and so on; until an equation is obtained, such that if the first be true, the last is therefore true. But the converse is that which we wished to ascertain. Is the hypothetical equation true, because the re- sulting equation is so? ‘To determine this, a similar query must be instituted from link to link throughout the chain of reasoning. Is each equation in succession true, because the next in succession is so? If each of these subordinate in- quiries admits of a decided affirmative, the reply to the ge- neral query is satisfactory; otherwise, it isnot. Now in the management of equations, we have been taught, either vir- tually or in direct terms, to rely upon certain “axioms, which for the present purpose will be most effectually stated in pairs, viz. If equals be added to equals, the wholes are equals) and, If equals be subtracted from equals, the remainders 7 I. are equal. If equals be multiplied by equals, the products are) equal; and iy If equals be divided by equals,the quotients vi ’ equal. 46 Mr. W.G. Horner on Congeneric Surd Equations. If equals be raised to powers denoted by equal ex-’) ponents, the powers are equal; and If of equal quantities roots be extracted, which SIII. are denoted by equal exponents, the roots are | equal. It has never been my chance, either to hear the validity of any of these principles called in question, or even any caution suggested as necessary in the application of them; and yet, when tested by the combined trial of their direct and reflex action, they will presently appear to be very susceptible of misuse in incautious hands. The first and second pair, abstractedly considered, afford such entire conviction, that in each of them, if either proposi- tion is granted, the other can be strictly demonstrated by means of it; and the second pair are truly corollaries to the first. No hesitation, no ambiguity, is felt. The fifth proposition, as a clear corollary to the third, is, in itself, equally satisfactory ; but quite otherwise in regard to its reflex effect, as described in the sixth. For, being aware that if wnegual quantities (+ a, —a) be raised to power, denoted by equal exponents, the powers may nevertheless be equal; we are assured that, conversely, if of equal quantities roots be extracted which are denoted by equal exponents, the roots may nevertheless be unequal. This remark furnishes a sufficient reason for rejecting the third pair of principles, and consequently the ordinary me- thod of clearing an equation from surds, For, in every in- stance in which this is effected by transposition and involution, in compliance with the fifth axiom, we tacitly assume that such step can be retraced with equal certainty by means of the sixth; whereas, in any such transit, the consequent equa- tion may be quite true, and yet the antecedent be quite false. If, however, we attribute the failure of the third pair of axioms to a special ambiguity peculiar to evolution, we shall remain under a delusion, and miss the cause and remedy of the evil. Involution is but a single instance of the erroneous application of the axioms of the third pair; but the use of any of the four unexceptionable axioms is liable to be frustrated by a similar cause, although in some cases the absurdity intro- duced is so palpable as to occasion a kind of instinctive uncon- scious avoidance. In other instances, however, even acute minds have failed to observe the fallacy. This I shall now point out, and prove that unless connected with the use of the first pair of axioms, it will be avoided, if no member of the equation is transposed to the zero side. The origin of the fallacy in question will be rendered more Mr. W. G. Horner on Congeneric Surd Equations. 47 evident by a course of amusing experiments upon a familiar equation, é. g. w+ 2a Te? —S8rt+12=—0, whose roots are 1, 2, —3, —2. Applying the four axioms in succession, we shall perceive how the incautious blending of two truths, by means of rules in themselves unexceptionable, will produce a falsehood. ish To #4 22°-—7e°=—8r+12=0 Add B= «le 10 at} 2 —722°=—|F7a4+ 11 = 0; a false equation, with regard to all the values of z, with the single exception of 1, the value already used. Similar results would accrue from the addition or subtraction of any other divisor of the equation; the result will be false in every value, except those which are also found in the equation added or subtracted. Thus, From 2* + 22° —72#* — 824412 @) Take 62° — 1827 4- 12 10) z+ 22 — 132° 4+ 102 = 0; whose only correct roots are those also of 27— 347+ 2 = 0. 2ndly, The given equation is resolvable into the quadratics 2—3r+2=0, anda’ +57+6=0. Therefore, multiply 2 — 3r=— 2 by e+ 5br=— 6 GE Da ae AG a= ~ 18% a statement altogether erroneous, not containing a single cor- rect value of z. On the other hand, divide a4+20% —~72? —8e = —12 by a’? —32e= — 23 P+ 2a —7T«4#—8 Hes = 6, xr—3 * P+I92r*—138 2 =— 10: incorrect, except in respect of the roots of z°— 37+2 = 0. You will clearly perceive, without dwelling upon the distine- tion of cases, the very simple nature and origin of the para- dox. The axioms speak of quantities which are s?multaneously equal; but no two roots of an equation, unless they be equal roots, are coexistent: if e = 1 it is not at the same time = 2. Consequently, as in each of the examples v in the upper of the two equations has some yalues, which substituted in the 48 Mr. W.G. Horner on Congeneric Surd Equations. lower will render its sides unequal, the results, as far as such values of 2 are concerned, are no longer coincident with the conditions of the axioms on which the management of equations is founded, but are illustrations of the opposite axioms, viz. that unequals added to, or subtracted from, or multiplied or divided by, equals, produce wnequal results, or in algebraic language, false equations. The reason why this inconvenience, in the use of the se- cond pair of axioms, cannot occur when all the terms are on one side and zero alone on the other, is very evident; al- though, by another of those paradoxes by which equations are beset, the complete truth appears at first sight to be the result of combining a truth with an error, and equals to re- sult from combining equals with uneguals. It is, however, easy to avoid all suspicion of error. ‘Thus, it was said, that the given equation is resolvable into a* + 3a + 2 = 0,and w2+5x+6=0. But as these statements are not s/multa- neously true, but, on the contrary, any value of 2 which satis- fies one of the quadratics will render the other = A, some numerical quantity differing from 0, we in fact collect the product of e — 32+ 2 = 0, or A; by ge ar + 12’*= Ay or ©, in finding (2? — 3x2 + 2) (a + 72 + 12) = 0; where the premises being strictly correct, the result is unexceptionable. And the same result arises, although not with equally clear evidence of its truth, when A is superseded by zero. The same test, of a hypothetical adjustment of one of the two proposed equations, would at once expose the fallacy of each of the conclusions attained in our imaginary experi- ment. The general propriety of keeping the zero-side of each equation in a. chain of argument clear from any transposed terms, is proved therefore by the liberty which it allows to the mind, of conceiving any zero, which happens to be pro tempore incorrect, to be superseded by the correct value, and of perceiving without any embarrassment or additional Jabour the exact conditions of the final result. But the especial pro- priety of adhering to this expedient, when surds are to be ex- tricated, appears in the necessity which it imposes of attending to the copula of the argument, the suppression of which in the vulgar process occasions all the obscurity that is com- plained of. ‘Thus, between the statements II a@a=Vf/nr or a4—-wVe (0) and Cm.” or a —) we ud Mr. W. G. Horner on Congeneric Surd Equations. 49 the copula a+ /r=A has been lost sight of. ‘The com- plete chain is We I FS OOr Fe a+ /x=A, or 0 Sc Ga Ch OQ. You are well aware that this copula will, in all cases of surd equations, consist of all the variations that can be made of the given formula by varying the affection of each radical it contains in all possible ways. You also can refer, more readily than myself, to various authors in whose works the method of forming the continued product of a formula and all such variations of it (for the sake of a convenient term I would ven- ture to say, its congeners) has been simplified. You see, that by retaining the entire set of congeneric equations, all doubt respecting the constancy of every symbol employed, whether letter or radical sign, is entirely cleared away. Uncertainty, indeed, still remains attached to the results of the solution of the final equation; namely, uncertainty as to which of the congeneric formule will be reduced to zero, by the resulting values of x; but this doubt is unconnected with any perplexity respecting the general theory. A very unnecessary ambiguity is admitted in the current acceptation of the word root; and great advantage would ac- crue from restricting it to its only legitimate signification of “such a value of the unknown in any linear divisor of the equation, as will cause that divisor to vanish.” The sum of the whole matter, respecting surd equations, I conceive to be this. We know that the continued product of a surd formula and all its congeners will produce a ra- tional formula; and that such rational formula, being equated to zero, may be solved by as many roots as it has dimensions. We are also certain that each of these roots will cause one of the congeneric surd formule to vanish ; otherwise the product of all would not be = 0 as assumed. But, is the value of x which effects this, to be called a root of the surd formula? No, it is a root of the rational combination only.— Have irra- tional equations, then, no roots? None at all.— What have they, then, in the place of roots ? An equitable chance, in com- mon with each formula in the congeneric society, of solution by means of the solution of the stock-equation.—But if an equation has no root, nor even a certainty of solution, in what form can it be intelligibly proposed? A note of interrogation subjoined might serve to intimate that the equation is pro- posed either for solution or correction—To what order can . ‘ F m , surd equations be assigned ? To the fractional order >? when ’ Third Series. Vol. 8. No. 43. Jan, 1836. H 50 Letter from the Rev. Dr. Lardner to Peter Barlow, Esq. n congeneric formule produce a rational equation of the mth order ; thus, ; 22+ 7% 2° —a = Bb? is of the 2 order. at J wt Jf BHO? =jOl° de secces 6 aWYate—-Va—x= 0? §...... Are the chances of solution equal for each individual congener? I leave that question in good hands, and remain, Yours, very affectionately, Bath, Nov. 12, 1835. W. G. Horner. XI. Letter to Peter Barlow, Esq., F.B.S., Sc., Sc., respecting some parts of his Reports addressed to the Directors and Pro- prietors of the London and Birmingham Railway Company. By the Rev. Dionysius Larpner, LL.D., F.R.S., &e. Dear Sir, ig was not until my return to London within the last few days that I had the pleasure of receiving a copy of your Second Report addressed to the Directors of the London and Birmingham Railway Company. The previous communica- tions which had passed led me to anticipate some collision of opinion between us, but I confess I did not expect that any difference should exist on a question of a nature so ele- mentary as that which you have noticed in your Report. In page 87 you say: ‘“‘ If (as was assumed in the Parliamentary Committee on the question of the Great Western Railway) as much power was gained in the descent as was lost in the ascent, the odds would be made all even. But that assumption is altogether erroneous both in theory and practice.” And again, in page 91, you say, referring to your theory of the deflexion of bars: “The only doubt, therefore, which can remain is, how far I ought to reject as inconsiderable any increase of power on the descending side. This point cannot be met experimen- tally, and I am therefore obliged to depend here only on de- monstration. The case certainly involves no difficulty of con- ception to those acquainted with theoretical mechanics; but the question having been seen in a different light by a gentle- man of considerable scientific eminence, I should have been glad to have exhibited the effect experimentally; but as the whole turns upon velocity, this is of course impossible.” To those who have taken an interest in the question respect- on the Theory of Gradients in Railways. 9 ing the effect of gradients, raised in my evidence before the Great Western Railway Committee, and subsequently more fully developed by me at the meeting of the British Association in Dublin, it will of course be evident that I am the person here alluded to. But since your Report must needs fall into the hands of many persons who have neither seen my evidence before Parliament, nor heard the discussion in Dublin, I think it right to explain briefly what the conclusions are at which I arrived, and which you declare to be erroneous both in theory and practice. There are on railways certain inclined planes, forming so small an angle with the horizon, that a load placed upon them will not descend by its gravity, the friction being greater than the tendency down the plane by gravity. Let the angle of elevation of such a plane be «, and let the greatest angle of elevation which is compatible with this conclusion be ¢. I shall call this angle, «’, the angle of repose. Now let us sup- pose an inclined plane at the inclination «, the length of which expressed in feet is L: let a load be placed upon the plane, the amount of which we shall take as the unit of weight. Let t be the ratio of the friction to the pressure peculiar to the nature of the road, the carriages, &c. which is of course a con- stant quantity, so long as the carriages and the road continue the same. Now the pressure upon the plane will be expressed by cos‘; but as « must be a very small angle, we may, without sensible error, take cos ¢ = 1, and consider the whole weight as pressing upon the inclined plane. In fact, ¢ is an angle so smal] that its sine does not exceed 0°004, and « being still stnaller, it is clear that cos¢ is so nearly equal to the unit that we are justified in this assumption. To determine the tractive force which must be applied to the load to draw it up the inclined plane, it is only necessary to add together the forces necessary to overcome the friction and the gravity: now the friction is ¢, and the gravity sin ¢; therefore the force which resists the motion up the plane will be¢+ sine. The moving power, therefore, which will keep the load moving up the plane at a uniform speed will exert a pull upon it which shall be expressed by ¢# + sine. The unit being the weight of the load, it is clear that the total expendi- ture of mechanical power in drawing the load the entire length of the plane will be expressed by L (¢ + sin «). Now to estimate the mechanical force necessary to draw the load at a uniform speed down the plane, we have only to con- sider that the force which is opposed to the drawing power is the friction ¢, diminished by that component of the weight of the load which is directed down the plane, and which of course H 2 52 Letter from the Rev. Dr. Lardner ¢o Peter Barlow, Esq. conspires with the drawing power. ‘The effective resistance, therefore, to the drawing power will be ¢sin s, referred to the weight of the load as the unit. The total expenditure of me- chanical force, therefore, necessary to cause the required de- scent will be L (¢ — sine). Now if we wish to determine the whole rnechanical power expended in ascending and descend- ing the plane, it is only necessary to add L (¢ + sin «) to L (¢— sine): the sum is2 L¢. Now it is obvious that this would be the amount of mechanical force expended in drawing the same load backwards and forwards on the level plane of the length L. If the angle of inclination of the plane were the angle of re- pose, then the tendency of the weight down the plane by its gravity would be precisely equal to the friction or sine’ =¢: there would in fact be no resistance to the motion down the plane, and consequently any velocity imparted to the load down the plane would be continued uniform without any drawing power to the bottom, supposing of course the plane to be free from the inequalities which would alter the amount of friction. To ascend such a plane, on the other hand, would require a drawing force of twice the amount necessary for a level, since t+ sine =2¢; and we accordingly arrive at the same con- ¢lusion,—that in ascending and descending planes whose in- clinations do not exceed <’, the total expenditure of mechanical power is the same as on the level, the only difference being that on the level it is expended by one continued uniform éxertion, and that on the inclinations it is greater in the as- cent and jess in the descent, the mean being the amount upon the level. T explained fully, both before Parliament and at the British Association, that this reasoning would not extend to greater elevations thax ¢', for that in these cases the power saved in the descent wonld be less than the excess expended in the ascent, and that, consequently, such gradients would always occasion a loss of mechanical power. Now really this conclusion is so plain a result of first prin- ciples that I have been utterly at a loss to discover in what can originate our difference of opinion about it. It struck me, therefore, that this discrepancy must have its origin, not in the above reasouing, but in some difference of conception re- specting the very foundations of mechanical science. It oc~ curred to me, therefore, to look over your Reports, to. see whether the same difference as to first principles would lead you to conclusions upon other points different from those at which I should have arrived: in this I was not disappointed, for I found in another case, in which the force of gravity is considered, and on the Theory of Gradients in Railways. 53 indeed one which is the extreme case of an inclined plane, viz. that of a perpendicular fall, you have arrived at a conclusion which certainly is totally at variance with the views which I have been accustomed to take of the theory of forces. In your First Report to the Directors of the London and Bir- mingham Railway Company, page 90, in speaking of the effect produced by the wheels of wagons passing over the joints of rails where one has sunk below the level of the other, so as to form a sort of slip, you say: _ «It has perhaps never occurred to such persons that a dif- ference of level at a joint-chair will, when the carriage is moving from the higher to the lower level at its greatest speed, cause the wheel to pass the distance of a foot without pressing on the rail, and consequently throwing the whole weight, which ought to be borne equally by the two rails, wholly upon one. Yet this is a fact resting upon a natural Jaw, and cannot be other- wise. To fall th of an inch by the action of gravity requires gzth part of a second, and in that time the carriage will have advanced a foot, and consequently in that space the whole weight has been borne by one rail only.” _ I freely confess that I am one of the persons you allude to, to whom such an idea never would have occurred. I am en- tirely ignorant of the natural law to which you allude, but I am not ignorant of a natural Jaw which is altogether incom- patible with your conclusion; and my conviction that the whole weight cannot press on the remaining wheel is quite as clear and strong as yours is that it will so press. It is quite true that the force of gravity will cause a body to fall freely jisth of an inch in J,th part of a second, but when the force of gravity is thus employed it cannot at the same time cause the whole weight of the same body to press upon a fixed point. The fact is, that when the wheel passes from the higher to the lower level, the centre of gravity being unsupported falls, and the only pressure exerted upon the remaining wheel depends on the moment of inertia of the load in receiving an incipient angular motion, and it is evident that this pressure must be extremely slight; but, whatever be its amount, it is totally dif- ferent both as to effect and cause from that which you allude to. If you consider that during the moment of a perpendicular fall, in the case of one rail being below the level of the other, the weight while it falls still presses with its whole force upon the rails, your view even of the most elementary principles of this part of mechanics is so essentially different from mine, that the wonder is, not that we should differ in one instance, but that we should agree in any. Referring again to your second Report, where you have 54 Letter from the Rev. Dr. Lardner to Peter Barlow, Esq. noticed my inferences respecting gradients, I find that you say that, ? “‘ As the question wholly turns upon velocity, it is of course impossible to exhibit the effect experimentally.” Now although I do not perceive this to be at all a matter of course, but on the contrary have found it very easy to reduce questions depending on velocity to experiment, yet I beg to observe that the present question does not depend either wholly or at all upon velocity. Whatever be the speed of the load upon the inclined plane, provided only it be main- tained uniform, my theory of gradients (if it deserve to be so called) will still hold good. It will take the same expenditure of mechanical force to move a load on such inclined planes as I have described, and the mean between the ascending and descending forces will be the force along a level plane. You must surely be so well acquainted with the laws of friction that it is needless for me to remind you that that resistance is alto- gether independent of the velocity. And I would also beg to observe that the case is one totally distinct from the consi- deration of accelerating forces. In page 91 you say: “This point cannot be met experimentally, and J am there- fore obliged here to depend only on demonstration. The case certainly involves no difficulty of conception to those acquainted with theoretical mechanics, &c.” I admit that it does not; but I apprehend the conception which those acquainted with theoretical mechanics form of it will be altogether different from that at which you appear to have arrived, and I therefore regret that you seem to have forgotten your expressed intention of giving a demonstration of your own peculiar view of the matter. In the next page (92) you mention the intention as one which you dad, but seem to have immediately abandoned it. It will be very gratifying to me, and I am sure it will be useful to all who are practically engaged in those extensive enterprises for the formation of lines of communication through the country, if you will show how these views of mine are at variance with the established principles of mechanics. Al- though I am not aware that any one has hitherto pointed out the property which I have explained in reference to inclined planes of less inclination than the angle of repose, yet, so far as I am informed, there is no difference of opinion whatever as to the legitimacy of the method of estimating the tractive force both in ascending and descending these planes. The same formulz that I have used, viz. L (¢ + sins), have been in substance universally adopted in estimating the mechanical force necessary to work railroads. You will find that many Dr. Ritchie on a supposed new Law of Magnetic Action. 55 eminent engineers, althongh they have not thrown the prin- ciple into the language of analysis, have nevertheless used it arithmetically ; and indeed I have never before heard any doubt expressed about it. During the Jast autumn I have been engaged in an exten- sive course of experiments on rail-roads in different parts of the kingdom, with a view to determine with greater precision than has been hitherto attained, the values of the different con- stant quantities which enter into their theory. The results of all these experiments are in the most perfect accordance with the principle you have called in question. I remain, dear Sir, yours very truly, Dron. Larpner. 36, Cambridge Terrace, Edgeware Road, December 14, 1835. XII. Remarks ona supposed new Law of Magnetic Action. By the Rev. Witiiam Ritcuie, LL.D., F.R.S, Professor of Natural Philosophy in the Royal Institution of Great Britain and in the University of London.* N the last Number of the London and Edinburgh Philoso« phica! Magazine}, Mr. Fox has endeavoured to show that the mutual attraction of two magnets does not follow the law formerly adopted by all philosophers, viz. the law of the inverse square of the distance ; but the law of the simple inverse of the distance. This law he deduces from experi- ments on the attraction of the opposite ends or poles of mag- nets placed at very small distances from each other. Thus, for example, when the ends of the magnets are at the distance of 5555 of an inch, he found the effect to be only one half of what it was when they were in contact; when removed to the distance of =,55 of an inch the effect was one half of one half, or one fourth; when separated by a distance of ;1, of an inch, the force was only one half of one fourth, or one eighth, &c.; which numbers are to each other in the inverse ratio of the distances I admit the truth of the experiments, but differ from Mr. Fox in the conclusion he has drawn from them. To show that the deduction is unfounded, we must first describe what is meant by the pole of a magnet, and its position with regard to the extremity of the magnet. The pole of a magnet is the centre of parallel forces of all the attractions and repulsions of the elementary magnets of which it is composed. Now the position of this centre will obviously depend on the form of * Communicated by the Author, t Vol. vii. p. 439, 56 Dr. Marshall Hall’s Description of a Thermometer the magnet, and also on its ength. Biot has shown that ina steel wire 24 inches long, and properly magnetizef, the pole is an inch and a half trom its extremity, and that this distance diminishes with every diminution in the length of the mag- net *. The centre of parallel forces or the pole of a magnet is similar to the centre of gravity of a body. In the one case the effect is the same as if all the matter of which the body is composed were concentrated in the centre of gravity, in the other the effect is the same as if the difference between the sum of all the attractive and repulsive forces were concen- trated in the pole. Now, in the case of the mutual attrac- tion of bodies, our measurements are always taken between the centres of gravity; in the case of magnetic attractions the distances of the magnets are, in fact, the distances between the poles. Let the distance of the poles of the magnets when 1 rr in apparent contact be call- a Ate ba ed2, as in fig. ( L.),and then (2.) * c ~ separated bY, an ae Lot —— of 1, as in fig. (2.), anc gi) 35 a —— by intervals of A as in (3+) nnssltetl fig. (3.) Then the distances between the centres of force in these three positions are 2, 3, 4. Hence if the law of the znverse squares of the distances, investigated by Coulomb, be the real law of action, the attractive forces will be inversely as 2°, 3°, 4°, that is, as 4, 3, 7,3; but 4 is nearly the half of one fourth, and ;4, nearly the half of 4, as Mr. Fox found by actual experiment. ‘These experiments then, instead of lead- ing to a new law of action, afford a beautiful illustration of that law which universally prevails whenever we have matter acting on matter by attractive or repulsive forces. XIII. Description of a Thermometer for determining minute Differences of Temperature. By Marsuary Hatt, M.D., ERS. Se. ¢ | pursuit of the theory of the inverse ratio of the respira- tion and of the irritability in the animal kingdom, an- nounced in a late volume of the Philosophical ‘Transactions, I have found it absolutely necessary to determine the minute * Biot, Traité de Physique, tom. ili. p. 90, + Communicated by tke Author. + An abstract of Dr. Marshall Hall’s paper on this subject will be found in Phil. Mag. and Annals, N.S, vol. xi, p. 453.—Epir. : for determining minute Differences of Temperature. 57 differences of temperature which exist in animals of the same class. In pursuing this inquiry, I soon discovered that it was essential to devise other instruments than those in ordinary use. It was easy by enlarging the bulb and by select- ing a tube of extremely fine calibre, to render the common thermometer capable of more minute in- dications. But it was impossible to carry this change beyond a certain degree, the augmented length of the instrument becoming highly incon- venient. In order to obviate this difficulty, I devised the instrument which I am now about to describe. The form of this instrument is represented in the accompanying outline. The relative size of the bulb and calibre of the tube is such that the tenth part of a degree occupies a considerable space upon the scale. ‘The entire scale consists of ten degrees. At the upper part of the thermometric tube a small bulb is blown, which I shall desig- nate the reservoir; it is turned forwards so as to remain at a right angle with the tube. Al The bulb and the tube are filled with mercury, and a little of that fluid is included in the reser- 9, voir, when the whole is hermetically sealed. When an experiment is to be made, the mer- cury in the tube is to be brought into contact with the mercury in the reservoir, by placing the in- strument horizontally, with the reservoir upwards, in water of a sufficient temperature. I will now suppose that I wish to try the comparative temperature of the swallow which shuns, and the sparrow which abides, the rigours of our winter. The thermometer is removed from the water at the temperature of 110° Fahr., and placed upright. The contiguity of the mercury in the tube with the mercury in the reservoir being broken, the highest point in the scale will represent that degree, viz. 110°. The lowest will consequently be the 100th degree. The entire scale is one of six degrees between these extremes, each degree being divided into tenths. The same plan is adopted for any other part of the scale. We have thus an instrument of the usual size, capable of measuring the tenths of a degree of temperature, at any part of the scale. It only requires the addition of a common thermometer to afford the extreme limit of the magnified scale. Third Series. Vo\. 8. No. 48. Jan. 1836. I 58 British Association for the Advancement of Science. I may be permitted to add, that the temperature of an ani- mal indicated by such a thermometer compared with that of the medium in which it is placed, affords a near approxima- tion to the degree of respiration, and, inversely, of the irrita- bility of the muscular fibre. LXV. Proceedings of Learned Societies. OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE BRITISH AS- SOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE, AT THE DUBLIN MEETING, AUGUST 1835. Communicated by the Council and Secretaries. (Continued from vol. vii. p. 513.) Notices and Abstracts of Miscellaneous Communications to the Sections, continued. MEDICAL SCIENCE,—continued. Experimental Inquiry into the different Offices of Lacteals, Lym- phaties, and Veins in the Function of Absorption. By P. D. Hanpysipe, M.D. Fe author’s general position is thus stated: “ The lacteals, lym- phatics, and veins are endowed each with a peculiar office in the general functions of absorption ; for example, 1. The lacteals are those vessels which absorb the aliment which is necessary for main- taining the nutrition and increase of the body, and exercise the property of refusing entrance to all other matters; 2. The lympha- tics absorb the elements of the body upon their becoming useless or noxious, so as by their final discharge from the system to make room for the deposition of new matter, and these vessels possess no ab- sorbing power over any substances foreign to the system; 3. The veins not only return to the heart the blood after that fuid has ful- filled the object of its diffusion over the system, but enjoy the office of receiving into the animal system by absorption various foreign matters which may be brought into contact with their orifices. In support of these views the author presents a short review of results obtained by various eminent anatomists and physiologists. The following is the order of the subjects discussed : Lacteals.—Their distention after a full meal,—their condition as observed in living animals ;—effects of ligatures on the thoracic ducts of horses. Lymphatics,—Anatomical origin of,—analogy of lymphatics and lae- teals,—exact resemblance of the lymph prior to its absorption to that found in the lymphatic vessels,—absence of lymphatics in vegetables,—no proof afforded by examination of lymph that lymphatics serve as the channel through which foreign matters gain entrance into the system,—no communication between lym- phatics and veins except through the great lymphatic trunks. Veins.—Analogy between the anatomy and disposition of the veins of animals and the vessels corresponding to these in plants, favours, the doctrine of venous absorption. Section of Medical Science. 59 “ When foreign matters capable of affecting the constitution ge- nerally, and of being diluted in its solids and fluids, are brought into contact with the serows and mucous surfaces of the body, with the ewtis vera, and with the interstitial cellular tissue of dif- ferent organs, the resulting phenomena exhibited by the blood in the veins give evidence that these vessels are the sole agents employed in this variety of absorption.” These four points are discussed by reference to a variety of experiments, to which the author adds the following from his own researches, as bearing on the question of absorption of foreign matters by veins of the cel- lular tissue. Exp. 1. Having made a fistulous opening in the abdominal parietes of a dog, he took advantage of the period when a complete granu- lating surface should be formed, to apply to it very freely the solu- tion of pruss. potass. On killing the animal three minutes after the application, and applying the appropriate chemical test to the blood, it was seen to exhibit traces of the prussiate. Exp. 2. He induced the formation of a granulating surface four inches square in extent in the fleshy substance of the back of a large cat, and then retained pledgets of lint moistened with 13 of the usual solution of the prussiate of potash in contact with this surface daring the space of four hours. A fair indication of the presence of the poison in the blood was seen, on submitting to the usual test the blood from the carotid arteries, both in its fluid and coagulated states, while no indication whatever of its presence was observed in the lymph. These experiments now put forth as evidence in favour of the doctrine of absorption by the veins of foretgn matters, from the 7- terstitial cellular tissue of the animal body, when taken along with the previous experiments also adduced to prove the absorption of foreign matters from the surface of the eutis vera and the different mucous and serous superficies, would appear to justify a conclusion— that the absorption of foreign matters occurring from the interstices and surfaces of the body occurs solely through the channel of the venous system. Observations on the effects of Cold on different parts of the Human Body, and on a mode of measuring Refrigeration. By Dr. OsBORNE. In this communication Dr. Osborne began by adducing some facts to show the importance of cold, viewed as a cause of disease. He stated, that of 57, the entire number of patients on the preced- ing day (13th August, 1835,) in Sir Patrick Dun’s Clinical Ho- spital, 34 could distinctly refer to cold as the cause of their com- plaints, contracted in the following manner: in 12 from damp clothes, 5 from damp feet, 3 from bathing, and 14 from cold air when heated. This proportion, however, would probably be very different in winter. The direct effect of cold on the air-passages of the lungs is almost restricted to inflammation at the rima of the glottis, and this is usually caused by suddenly rushing from heated 60 British Association for the Advancement of Science. to cold air. It may be proved that the respired air, being of nearly the same tempevature as the blood, and not deriving its heat from the action of respiration in the lung (see Brodie’s Experiments), must, in its passage downwards, be heated to considerably more than half the difference between the temperature of the blood and that of the air; that, consequently, at its arrival in the air-vesicles of the lungs, it must have acquired such a temperature as amounts to a protection against the effects of cold. Dr. Osborne considers this as a provision of nature in a matter in which we are not able to guard ourselves. When, owing to an oppression of nervous energy, the healthy temperature of the surface is not maintained, then the air arrives at the air-vesicles without being heated; hence, he conceives, may be explained the numerous instances of sudden death which oceur in chronic bronchitis and low fevers when sudden depressions of the temperature of the atmosphere have taken place during the night. In those cases the cold thus admitted to the lungs causes a torpor in their capillary circulation ; and after death it is found that the blood has stagnated in the lungs, and in the veins and right cavities of the heart. The common opinion that various inflammatory diseases are con- tracted by sleeping in newly-built houses appears to be ill founded, except in as far as the clothes worn by the individual may contract moisture. The air under the bedelcthes being kept up by the heat of the body to the temperature 80°, the only way in which the damp air can prove injurious is by the lungs, which, as before stated, are, in health, enabled to resist its effects. It appears that in a regiment which was quartered in newly-built barracks no injury resulted from the damp. On the stomach the effect of cold is perceived, not by a sensation of cold in that organ, but by thirst, in consequence of reaction, a& is experienced after taking ices. When the cold is long-continued or overpowering, in consequence of feeble reaction, then gastritis is produced from torpor of the capillaries. This last mode of expla- nation is derived from the phenomena observed in the exterior of the body on the application of cold. When the application is transient and the circulation vigorous, the contraction of the vessels and paleness of the surface are only momentary, and are succeeded by reaction evinced in increased heat and diffused blush of redness. When it is long continued, then the pale and shrunk state of the surface is gra- dually succeeded by a purple or livid colour, attended with increase of size, as may be proved by a ring on the finger, from the swollen state of the vessels. Comparing these facts with the experiments de- tailed by Dr. Alison,—which showed that in inflamed parts not only the small vessels but the large arterial trunks leading to the part are dilated, and veadered incapable of contracting like other arteries,— Dr. Osborne proposes the question, whether there is not sufficient evidence to prove that cold produces inflammation by producing torpor and dilatation of the vessels, either of the part itself or of some connected or adjacent part, which, if not removed by transient Section of Medical Science. 61 reaction, is followed by the more permanent reaction of inflamma- tion, causing a number of new phenomena. With regard to the effect of cold on the skin, which is the most important of all, it is evident that meteorology has contributed very little to our knowledge of the influences of the atmosphere on health or disease. It has appeared to the Author, that in order to connect this science with utility, as far as mankind is concerned, one considera- tion has been omitted, which is, the cooling power of the atmosphere estimated with reference to ourselves. The human body has a heat of nearly 98°, and is placed in a medium always cooler than itself. The degree of cooling influence exerted on it has never been made the subject of measurement, and to the present time is estimated solely by the feelings. In order to measure the cooling influences of the air or other media, Dr. Osborne used a spirit thermometer, without a frame, carefully graduated from the degree 90 to 80 in- clusive, that being nearly the temperature of the exterior of the body. Having heated the bulb to 90°, he exposed it in different situations, observing the time during which the spirit descended from 90° to 80°; and adopting, as a measure of the refrigerating power, the rate of cooling deduced. And by this contrivance is exhibited the result of radiation, and of the conducting power of the atmosphere as modified by its temperature, its density, its moisture, and its cur- rents; and that result, the most interesting of all to the invalid, who, in respect to temperature, may be conceived as represented by the instrument. As the variety in the shape of the bulb, the bore of the tube, the thickness of the glass, or the density and quantity of the fluid employed will cause variety in the time of the descent, the result obtained with two thermometers must not be ex- pected exactly to correspond. In order to procure uniformity for this purpose, it will be necessary to place a number of them, pre- viously graduated between 90° and 80° and heated to 90°, in air at 60° or 50°, and to select those which contract according to the time fixed on as a standard. The thermometer so applied, Dr. Osborne proposes to call a psychometer, or measurer of refrigeration. Amongst the observations brought forward by him to illustrate its use are the following: To show the refrigerating effect of agitation or of a breeze, the temperature of the air remaining the same. In air, temp. 70° at rest, it cooled from 90° to 80° in 5™ 208. in a slight, breezes... sas. danssbeosr cn UUZ™ 508, blown on with a bellows ............in 58%. These observations show the fallacy of determining climate by the thermometer. ‘There are situations in which, owing to constant currents of air, a cold is produced of the utmost consequence to health, but not appreciable by the thermometer. Dr. Osborne ex- pects that by means of this mode of observation much light may be thrown on the climates of the western coast of Africa, and of other unhealthy localities. The meteorological tables at present kept in those places fail in showing the effect of the sea and land breezes. The following shows the refrigerating power of water above air of the same temperature, at rest, to be above 14 to 1. 62 British Association for the Advancement of Science. In air at rest, temperature 70°, it cooled from 90° to 80° in 5™ 405. In water at rest, same temperature.........secceceeeeeeeeeees IM 248, It is well known that in swimming it is not the fatigue so much as the refrigeration which fixes the limit. This appears from the following observation compared with the preceding. The instrument agitated in water, cooled from 90° to 80° in 15°. In order to ascertain the refrigeration produced by damp clothes, Dr. Osborne covered the bulb of the instrument with cotton wool, and having placed it at rest in an apartment at 683°, found it to cool from 90° to 80° in 10" 148. Placing it in the same circumstances, but with the cotton wool slightly damped, it cooled down in 2™ 57%. This proportion must be much increased when under the influence of the open air. The application of cotton wool to the skin, moist- ened with water or an evaporating lotion, he has found the most eligible means of cooling the surface in disease, not only on account of the constancy with which the refrigeration is maintained, but from its being peculiarly agreeable to the feelings of the patient. On the Influence of the Artificial Rarefaction or Diminution of At- mospheric Pressure in some Diseases, and the Effects of its Con- densation or increased Elasticity in others. By Sir JAMES Murray. The paper was divided into two parts. The first detailed the ge- neral principles of the rarefaction of air, and its powers as a reme- dial agent on the human body. The second part related to the local agency of condensation of air in topical diseases. The propositions were submitted, not as remedial means of them- selves alone, but as auxiliary to those already in use. It was shown, That the ordinary atmospheric pressure sustained by the whole body averages 15 tons ;—that by placing a person in an air-tight bath, with provision for breathing the ordinary atmosphere, half a ton or a ton can be removed without danger : That the abstraction of this elastic compression permits the easier expansion of the chest, elicits the bleod and animal heat to the sur- face of the body, opens the pores of the skin, and restores to the surface rashes or eruptions which had been suppressed. It was therefore submitted, that an agent capable of producing such effects is entitled to consideration in treating certain conditions of pectoral diseases; in eliciting internal congestions or inflamma- tions from central organs to the surface ; in preventing certain fevers, and other complaints arising from obstructions of the cutaneous functions; in translating gout and rheumatism from vital organs to the limbs ; in restoring a due balance of the circulation, and attract- ing the blood into the superficial veins from the deep-seated arteries. A case of a patient was detailed, in which congestion of the brain was diverted from the head by inclosing one of the lower extremi- ties in a rarefying bath, and abstracting about two pounds and a half of pressure from each inch of the surface: the influx of the fluids was so great, that in two hours the circumference of the limb was Section of Medical Science. 63 increased nearly three inches, the vessels of the skin rendered red, warm, and turgid, and the head relieved. The case of a painter was also adduced, whose right arm had long been paralysed and cold from the effects of lead paint. The arm was put for two hours into the rarefying case, and afterwards con- tinued hot and vigorous, so that the man was able to resume his work. Part second.—As diseases of an opposite nature require opposite remedies, the principle of rarefaction is reversed in certain cases, and condensation, or additional pressure, employed. This part of the paper detailed several cases illustrative of the powers of this agent. Where there was too much vascularity of parts, then local pressure, pumped under an air-tight covering, emptied the vessels, propelling onwards the overflow of blood contained in the veins, and preventing its undue influx by the arteries. The consequences were, to diminish inflammations, dissipate tu- mours and white swellings, facilitate the reduction of hernia and other protrusions, and to diminish the influx of fluids into indurated breasts or enlarged glands. The author adduced a very interesting case, the reduction of a prolapsus ani by atmospheric pressure, without touching or bruising the sensitive intestine. The powers of condensation of air were then alluded to, for the treatment of fungous sores or ulcers, and for the suppression of uterine hemorrhages, as well as bleeding from wounds or lacera- tions *. On the Differential Pulse. By Dr. WDowne tt. Dr. M’Donnell’s paper began with a description of what he terms “the Differential Pulse,” and with proofs of his claim to priority in ascertaining it in 1784. The observations which succeed related to the following subjects. The influence of disease and of particular remedies upon the pulse, with a reference to the effect of posture on the number of beats; the absence of this phenomenon in quadrupeds, owing to their natural vessels being horizontal in both the lying and standing posture ; certain cases of health and disease, in which the maximum and minimum of this variation are found ; the methods to be pursued for investigating the number of the pulse in wild and ferocious ani- mals as deducible from their respirations ; the proportion between the stops, pulses, and respirations in man and quadrupeds in active ex- ercise ; observations made at a depth of 26 feet in a diving-bell, which corroborate the views of Sir David Barry and Dr. Carson on the moving powers in the circulation; proofs that barometrical va- riations have no influence upon the pulse or breathings. Part 2.—On the limitations of the doctrine of the “ Differential * In vol. xiv. of the Philosophical Magazine, First Series, p. 293, was published a paper on Smith’s Air-Pump Vapour-Bath, an instrument which . was designed to effect, by the same means, many of the objects contemplated by Sir J. Murray.—Epir. 64 British Association for the Advancement of Science. Pulse”; of stationary or permanent pulses; observations made on the pulses of children before and after their having respired ; of the acceleration of the pulse after birth; observations on quadrupeds with respect to this; supposition that the foetus remains before birth in the state of the cold-blooded aninials; of the final cause of this peculiarity; of the cause of the stethoscopic sounds of the foetal heart being very rapid, although the pulse in the funis be slow ; an account of an experiment made by a watch ticking under water ; of the remarkable strength of the fcetal pulse as felt in the chord; of the absorption of the blood in the chord into the system of the foetus after delivery ; and the inference from this in favour of the views of Sir David Barry and Dr. Carson respecting the suction power of the thorax as influencing the circulation. On some hitherto unobserved Differences in the Effects of Accumu- lations of Liquids or of Air within the Cavity of the Thorax. By Dr. WitttAM STOKES. On Aneurism by Anastomosis. By R. Avams, A.M, Member of the Royal College of Surgeons. Abstract of a Case of deficient Development of the right Hemi- sphere of the Brain, with Congenital Malformation of the Hip and Wrist Joints, and Atrophy of the Members of the same Side. By Dr. Hutton. Description of a Case of Deformity of the Pelvis, in which the Cesa- rean Operation was successfully performed. By G. B. KNowLEs, MR.CS., FLS., Lecturer on Botany atthe Birmingham School of Medicine. Propositions concerning Typhus Fever,deduced from numerous Obser- vations. By Dr. Perry. On the Use of Chloride of Soda in Fever. By Roz. J.Graves, M.D. Dr. Graves commenced a series of clinical experiments in 1832 upon the efficacy of chloride of soda in petechial and maculated fever. He has exhibited this medium at Sir Patrick Dun’s Hospital and at the Meath Hospital, where its effects have been witnessed by a great number of physicians as well as pupils. The form recom- mended is Labarraque’s solution, which is a saturated solution of chloride of soda. ‘This was given in doses of from fifteen to twenty drops in an ounce of camphor mixture every fourth hour. In the commencement of fever, where there is great heat of skin and signs of vascular excitement, its employment is contraindicated. It is also inadmissible in cases where there is decided evidence of vis- ceral inflammation. When the early stage of fever is past, when all general and local indications have been fulfilled, when there is no complication with local disease, when the patient lies sunk and pro- strated, when restlessness, low delirium, and more or less derange- ment of sensibility is present, when the pulse is quick, when the body is covered with maculz or petechie, and the secretions from the skin and mucous membranes give evident proof of what has. been termed a putrescent state of the fluids, it is then that the chlo- ride of soda may be prescribed with advantage. It operates, although ~ —_—— a oe — ar Subsection of Mechanical Sciences applied to the Arts. 65 not rapidly, yet energetically, in arresting many of those symptoms which create most alarm. It seems to counteract the tendency to tympanitis, to correct the foetor of the excretions, to prevent collapse, to promote a return to a healthy state of the secretions of the skin, bowels, and kidneys; in fact, it appears admirably calculated to meet the bad effects of low putrid fever. Its employment does not preclude the use of wine or other approved remedies. Dr. Graves has used it in several hundred cases of typhus, and strongly recom- mends its employment in that disease. Original Views of the Functions and Diseases of the Intestinal Canal, $c. By Dr. O'BEiRNE. On Purulent Ophthalmia. By Dr. Evory KEnneEpy. Dr. Evory Kennedy gave a report of numerous cases of purulent ophthalmia of infants, in which leeching, constant removal of the pu- rulent secretion, and caustic applications, modified according to the violence of the attack, and, in aggravated cases, the solid nitrate of silver, applied to the interior of the lids, had proved most successful. A notice of the curved Drill Catheter, invented by Mr. Francis L’EsTRANGE, was presented to the meeting. Mr. Hawks exhibited to the Section specimens of Harrington’s patent Electrizer. — / Abstract of Registry kept in the Lying-in Hospital of Dublin. By Rogert Coutuins, M.D., late Master of that Institution.* MECHANICAL SCIENCES APPLIED TO THE ARTS. On Impact and Collision. By Eaton HopcGKinson. Mr. Hodgkinson reported to the Section the results of certain ex- periments made by him on impact and collision, in continuation of those communicated to the Association in the year 1834 on the collision of imperfectly elastic bodies. The results were, First, That cast-iron beams being impinged upon by certain heavy masses or balls of metal of different kinds, were deflected through the same distance, whatever were the metals used, provided that the weights of the masses were equal. Secondly, That the impinging masses rebounded after the stroke through the same distances, whatever was the metal of which they were composed, provided that the weights were the same. Thirdly, That the effect of the masses of different metals impinging upon an iron beam were entirely independent of their elasticities, and were the same as they would give ifthe impinging masses were inelastic. Mr. Hodgkinson also gave the result of some interesting experi- ments on the fracture of wires under different states of tension, from * Of this and some other communications made to the Medical Section, the titles only of which are given in our report, abstracts will be found in the copies of the Proceedings of the Association, separately printed for the use of the members.— Epi. Third Series. Vol. 8. No. 43. Jan. 1836. K 66 British Association for the Advancement of Science. which it appeared that the wire best resisted fracture and impact when it was under the tension of a weight which, being added to that impinging upon it equalled one third of the force that was ne- cessary to break it. On the Solid of least Resistance. By J. S. Russevy. Mr. Russell was called upon to give an account of a new form for the construction of ships, by which they should experience least re- sistance from the water in their passage through it. A vessel of 75 feet keel and 6 feet beam had been built on this new formation, and made the subject of very accurate experiments, from which it appeared that this vessel, named the “ Wave”, experienced much less resistance in passing through the water than vessels of the very finest formation and from the best builders on the old construction. Mr. Russell then detailed very minutely the mode of forming any vessel on his plan when the length and breadth were given. The peculiarity, in general terms, appears to be the formation of the en- trance lines from parabolic ares, so as to have a point of inflection at about one sixth part from the bow of the vessel, before which the bow is concave externally, giving the finest possible entrance at the stern, at an angle of contact infinitely small, and behind which the con- vexity is external and the formation elliptical to the midship section, after which the formation becomes wholly ellipsoidal. Mr. Russell had been induced to consider this solid as the solid of east resistance from a phenomenon that appeared to distinguish this form from all others, namely, that it entered the water at the highest velocities without breaking in the slightest degree the evenness of its surface ; that, while at high velocities all other formations dashed the water into spray or raised it in waves above the surface, this vessel, at ve- locities of 16 or 18 miles an hour, appeared to give no motion to any particles of water, excepting such as happened to lie in its path. He considered the entrance into smooth water without ruffling the sur- face as the criterion of minimum resistance. Mr. Russell observed, that the form had been constructed on a hypothetical view of the subject, viz. that the minimum force requi- site to alter the position of any fluid particle would be that which gave to the particle a uniformly accelerated velocity through the former half of its path, and a uniformly retarded velocity during the remainder; that the well-known relation of the coordinates of the parabola accomplished this in the manner formerly explained, but that he rested for the proof of the correctness of the theory upon the experiments he had already adduced. Mr. Russell then described a very simple mode of construction, by which the ordinates of a circle or a table of sines might be used so as, in the most elementary mechanical manner, to form a very close approximation to the solid of least resistance ; and he concluded by drawing the lines of a vessel of given dimensions according to the new formation of least resistance. On certain points in the Theory of the Construction of Railroads. By the Rev. Dr. LARDNER and C, VIGNOLLES. ees he ae ie Subsection of Mechanical Sciences applied to the Arts. 67 On the Monthly Reports of the Duty of Steam-engines employed in draining the Mines of Cornwall. By Joun Tay or, F.RS., Treasurer of the British Association. Mr. Taylor observed that he had found at this and other Meetings of the Association considerable interest to be expressed with regard to this method of recording the actual effect produced by the con- sumption of a given quantity of fuel, and recommended it to the notice of engineers in general. ‘The monthly reports alluded to gave the means of comparing one engine with another in this district; they also afforded an historical view of the progress of improvement in this important machine; and they had, Mr. Taylor believed, contributed largely to that improvement, by the emulation and at- tention excited by them in the persons who had the charge of con- structing and managing the engines. Mr. Taylor stated that the work done in the best engines now employed in Cornwall by the consumption of one bushel of coal, re- quired ten or twelve years ago the consumption of two bushels ; that during the period of Boulton and Watt’s patent four bushels were consumed to do the same work, and that in the earlier stages of the employment of steam power the quantity of coal used was 16 bushels, So that by the progressive advance of improvement one bushel had become sufficient for the ‘duty that formerly required sixteen. Mr. Taylor, in remarking on the importance of this subject to the deep mines of Cornwall, stated, that the steam-engines now at work for the purpose of draining the mines there were equal i in power to at least 44,000 horses, and that as some doubts had frequently been expressed as to the accuracy of the results shown by the duty re- ports, he had compared them some time since with the accounts of the coal actually used in some of the principal mines at different periods, by which he found the saving of money was as great as the reports indicated, and that their general accuracy was borne out fully by the account books, where this was incontestably proved. Description of a Self-registering Barometer 5c. By Prof. StEVELLY. During the oscillations of the common barometer, when it falls, a certain quantity of mercury is added to that already in the cistern, which of course adds so much to its weight; on the contrary, when it rises, mercury retires from the cistern, which thereby becomes so much lighter than before. If, then, the tube of a barometer be fixed firmly in its place, but the cistern be by any means so suspended as to move downwards by equal distances for equal additions to its weight, and to rise similarly for similar diminutions of its weight, it is clear that a scale may be placed beside the cistern; and an index carried by the cistern may be made to mark upon the scale a variety of positions corresponding to the rising and falling of the common barometer. It may be shown to any person even slightly conversant with mathematical subjects, that the range of this scale may be made to bear any proportion to that of the common baro- meter. Supposing for an instant what is now stated to be accom- K 2 68 British Association forthe Advancement of Science. plished, it is obvious that a pencil may be so attached to the cisterm as to rise and fall with it, and thus to mark on a properly ruled sheet of paper, carried by clockwork across the instrument, the indications of the barometer at the successive hours of the day; and thus a curve representing the actual diurnal oscillations of the barometer can be placed before the eye, and a registry kept from day to day on separate sheets of paper. The mean curve can also be had by making the pencil traverse, day after day, for a long period, the same sheet of paper; for the pencil-marks will at length become blackest and heaviest upon the parts corresponding to the mean curve; and thus all the labour of actual observation, registry, &c. will be avoided, and thus, too, much of the trouble of reduction, if not all, will be saved. Many mechanical methods of suspending the cistern will readily suggest themselves to persons conversant with practical matters ; but the method that is preferred by the author is by a mercurial hy- drometer, the cistern, for the sake of stability, being suspended underneath the hydrometer, as in Ronchetti’s modification of Nichol- son’s hydrometer. The accompanying drawing will give an idea of the form of the instrument; the following is the description of it. The guide-wheels and supports are omitted. ; B the barometer tube (it may be of ir iron) firmly fixed in its place, and dip- | ping below into C, the cistern, which is suspended by F, a frame, supported by S, the pillar or stem of H, the hydrometer ball, which floats in A, a vessel firmly fixed, and contain- ing the mercury (or other fluid) in which the hydrometer floats. In the description of this instrument given to the Subsection, it was sup- posed that the surfaces of the mercury in the cistern and in the vessel A were so large that the rising or falling of the fluid in these vessels might be neglected; also, since the instrument is very sensible, it was supposed that the lower part of the barometer tube which dips into the cistern should be rendered very small, in order to di- minish unsteady oscillation. Also the internal part of the barometer tube B at the upper part, the external part where it dips into the mercury in the cistern, as well as the cistern and the vessel A, at the surfaces of the mereury in them, were all supposed to he cylindrical. And it was then shown Subsection of Mechanical Sciences applied to the Arts. 69 in a popular manner, that if the internal cross section of the baro- meter tube at its upper part were made equal to the cross section of the pillar or stem of the hydrometer, the sensibility of the instru- ment would be too great for practice; the scale in that case would be lengthened out indefinitely, since the hydrometer could never sink sufficiently to attain a position of equilibrium upon a fall of the barometer, and vice versd. But if the cross section of the stem or pillar of the hydrometer be made twice as great as the internal cross section of the upper part of the barometer, the rising and falling of the cistern would be exactly equal to the rising and falling of the common barometer ; and therefore the scale of this instrument would then be equal to the scale of the common barometer; and between these limits any desired scale, however long, may be obtained. A scale shorter than that of the common barometer may also be had by increasing the cross section of the stem of the hydrometer be- yond the above limit ; but this is not likely to be ever desired. When it is desirable to save expense, the hydrometer may be made to float in water; but of course its dimensions will require to be much greater in that case: or the cistern may be counterpoised, and a cylinder like the stem of the hydrometer, dipping into the mercury, may, by its varying buoyancy, be made to restore the equilibrium. The exact mathematical formula which gives the relation of the scale to that of the common barometer, whatever be the dimensions of the parts of the instrument, is of the form 6h = dh' x C, where 6h is the variation of the height of the common barometer, 2h! is the corresponding part of the scale of this instrument, and C a con- stant depending for its value upon the dimensions of the several parts of the instrument. Professor Stevelly also described a very simple and cheap instru- ment for weighing hydrometrically, the sensibility of which is very remarkable,—a hydrometer-ball with a stem of steel wire, having upon it one or two dots of gold, and a scale-pan attached to it, either above as in Nicholson’s, or below as in Ronchetti’s modification of the hydrometer. An index, or a microscope with a horizontal wire, is attached to the side or cover of the vessel in which the hydro- meter floats in such a way that it may be steadily and slowly raised or lowered to mark the position of the gold-dot, instead of taking the indications from the surface of the fluid, as in the common method. The weight of the substance to be weighed is then had by placing it in the seale-pan, bringing the index or wire of the microscope to mark the position of the gold-dot, then removing the substance and substituting for it known weights until the dot is again brought to the same position. Since the adjustment takes place at the instant of using the instrument, it becomes almost incapable of being deranged, and thus a very correct balance may be had by a common apothe- cary’s phial, with a little mercury to steady it, and a knitting-needle pushed down through its cork, and a scale-pan placed above. Every person knows the difficulty of adjusting the common hydrometer, and its liability to derangement. The same principle may be readily conceived to apply to the con- struction of a self-registering rain-gauge. 70 British Association for the Advancement of Science. On Vibration of Railways. By Capt. Denuam, R.N. Capt. Denham ascertained that the vibrating effects of a passing laden railroad train in the open air extended laterally on the same level 1110 feet, (the substratum of the positions being the same,) whilst the vibration was quite exhausted at 100 feet when tested ver- tically from a tumel. The tunnel was through a stratum of sandstone rock: the rails laid in the open air on a substratum of 12 feet of marsh over sand- stone rock. The method of testing was by mercury reflecting ob- jects to a sextant. The experiments were made in the neighbour- hood of Liverpool. Mr. Anprew Parircuarp exhibited examples of various kinds of apparatus constructed by him for illustrating the Polarization of Light; and gave a brief account of his improved achromatic micro- scope, one of which was placed upon the table. The construction of a simple polariscope invented by Mr. Pritch- ard was explained. The crystals to be examined were mounted in slides and introduced between tourmalines, by which means sections of any crystals that present themselves may be examined, and the cell of the upper tourmaline being removeable can be employed for other experiments. A lens was attached for condensing artificial light. The mechanical part of the achromatic microscope produced was constructed on the principles recently published by Dr. Goring and Mr. Pritchard in their works on the microscope: the chief feature in the optical part was the execution of a set of object-glasses which admitted a pencil of light of siaty-eight degrees, free from spherical and chromatic aberration, having the oblique pencils nearly correct and the field of view moderately flat. Mr. Pritchard stated expressly of this instrument, that it was the simplest that had yet been con- structed that would accomplish all the work that might be required of a microscope, either for general examination, dissection, or minute investigation. Preparations of various classes of microscopic objects in Canada balsam were exhibited. Mr. Hawkins explained the principle of Saxton’s locomotive Dif- ferential Pulley ; and a mode of producing rapid and uninterrupted travelling by means of a succession of such pulleys set in motion by steam-engines or by horses. Mr. CHEvERTON read a paper on Mechanical Sculpture, or the production of busts and other works of art by machinery, and illus- trated the subject by specimens of busts and a statue in ivory, which were laid on the table. This machine, in common with many others, produces its results only through the medium of a model to govern its movements; but it has this peculiarity, that the copy which it makes of the original is of a size reduced in any proportion, and that it is enabled to effect this result not merely on surfaces, such as bas reliefs, but in the round figures, such as busts and statues. Geological Society. 71 Mr. Errrick gave an account of certain improvements proposed by him in the Astronomical Clock for giving the pendulum a free motion at right angles to the line of its motion, and thereby pre- venting the tendency to acquire a circular motion by any improper adjustment of the pendulum-spring. He described a mariner’s steering-compass provided with two ad- justments, whereby the card was made to point ¢rve bearings on the horizon; the variation and local attraction being allowed for by regu- lating the position of the needle on the card. He also read an account of certain improvements on steam- engines, for making available the power of the steam of high-pressure boilers, which is below the pressure of the atmosphere, by allowing the high-pressure steam to pass off into the atmosphere, and allowing the steam of low-pressure to pass into a condenser through a secon- dary slide. He gave a description of a method of securing the seams of boilers by longitudinal instead of the present circular clenches ; and of a machine for drilling boiler plates as rapidly as they can be punched by the punching machine. Mr. Rogerts exhibited a machine which renders objects visible while revolving 200,000 times a minute. If a firebrand be whirled, in the dark, round a centre in a plane perpendicular to the eye of the spectator, it will present the appear- ance of a luminous circle. From this fact it has been inferred, that the impression on the retina made by the luminous body in its pas- sage through every point of the circle, remains until the body has completed a revolution. How rapidly soever the firebrand may be made to revolve, the circle, and, therefore, every part of it, will be distinetly visible: hence a probability arises, that at the greatest at- tainable velocity, a perfect impression of the object in motion will still be produced on the optic nerve, provided that the time of view- ing such object be limited to that which is required for passing through a small space—small, at least, with reference to the size of the revolving body—and also that no other object be presented on the field of vision before the former spectrum shall have vanished from the eye; unless in the case of the same object under similar circumstances. The former of these conditions is provided for in machine, No. 1, in which the eye-hole is made to travel through 180 feet between every two inspections of the moving object, and which object is made to assume a different position at each succes- sive inspection. The latter condition is included in machine No. 2; the object is there presented to the eye in one position only. GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY. Nov. 7, 1835.—The Society assembled this evening for the Session. A paper was first read, entitled ‘A notice on the Fossil Beaks of four extinct species of Fishes, referrible to the genus Chimera, which occur in the oolitic and cretaceous formations of England,” by the Rev. William Buckland, D.D., F.G.S., &e. This paper has been given atlength in the present Number, at p. 4. 72 Geological Society. A paper was next read, “ On the recent discovery of Fossil Fishes ( Palgoniscus catopterus, Agassiz,) in the new red sandstone of T yrone, Ireland ;"’ by Roderick Impey Murchison, Esq., V.P.G.S. A Sinall specimen of new red purtachenved presenting the first im- pressions of fishes found in this formation in the British Isles, having been exhibited before the Geological Section of the British Association at the late meeting in Dublin, Mr. Murchison, in company with Prof. Sedgwick, Lord Cole, and Mr. Griffith, visited the spot where it had been obtained. The quarry is at Rhone Hill, in the parish of Killyman, about three miles east of Dungannon. ‘The new red sandstone in which it is ex- cavated is a prolongation of the deposit which occupies large tracts in the county of Antrim, and extends into this part of Tyrone, where it surrounds a small, slightly productive coal-field, but reposes for the greater part upon mountain Jimestone. The eastern flank of the di- strict is covered by a vast thickness of clay, containing lignite, the exact age of which is not known; and the surface generally is very much overlaid by loose detritus, consisting of sand and gravel, derived from the adjacent formations. Large blocks of syenite and green- stone, referrible to a northern origin (Antrim), are scattered here and there. The beds of new red sandstone exposed in the quarry dip about 15° to the N.N.E., and consist, in the upper part, of red and green marls, passing down into a dark red, thickly bedded, siliceous sandstone, with a few irregular, highly micaceous way-boards of a deep purple. colour. The surface of some of the beds exhibits ripple-marks. The quarry, which is the property of Mr. Greer, is from 25 to 30 feet deep, and the fishes are found only in the bottom beds, but are in great abundance *, Dr. Agassiz afterwards gave a systematic enumeration of the fos- sil fishes which he has found in English collections. He commenced by detailing the general results of his researches, from which it appears, that the discovery in England of three hundred new species has corroborated the laws of development which he had previously de- termined in the succession of these animals during the different changes which our globe has undergone, with the exception of the discovery in the chalk of two species belonging to two genera which he had before observed only in the oolitic series, and of a species of one of those genera in the lower tertiary strata. The secondary systems (terrains) of England are the richest in fos- sil fishes ; and Dr. Agassiz stated that the number of specimens which he has seen in English collections is astonishing. The species which he has determined are about 400; but the specimens too imperfect to be described, at present, announce the existence of a still greater number. Their geological distribution presents the following details: In the Silurian system of Mr. Murchison there are five or six spe- cies which exhibit the first appearance and organization of this long * A slab, presented to the Geological Society by Mr. Greer, exhibits, on a surface not exceeding two feet square, above 250 fishes. Geological Socicty. 73 series of vertebral animals, the species of which become more and more numerous, and more and more diversified, as well in their forms as in the details of their organization. The old red sandstone, including the Caithness schist and the Gam- rie deposit, contains twenty species. In the coul measures there are fifty-four species ; in the magnesian limestone sixteen. The oolitic series is particularly rich in ichthyolites, the number of species from the lias to the Wealden inclusive being one hundred and fifty. The greensand and chalk are also very rich in fossil fishes, and even much richer than their equivalents on the Continent. The num- ber of English species is fifty. In the London clay the species perfectly determined are about fifty, but it is certain, from the fragments preserved in different collections, that this formation incloses the remains of a much greater number. M. Agassiz stated that the London clay, particularly in Sheppey, will be, for a long time, an inexhaustible mine. The crag contains five or six species peculiar to it, and belonging to genera which do not inhabit our northern seas. As an example of what remains to be done in the study of fossil fishes, and of the importance of these researches to zoology and geo- logy, M. Agassiz afterwards described two singular genera found in the lias. One is the animal which has been described under the name of Squalo-raia, discovered at Lyme Regis ; the other a new genus, called by M. Agassiz Gyrostris mirabilis, and is probably the largest known fish. This fossil was discovered at Whitby; but there have hitherto been found only some detached bones of the head, of the branchial arcs, and some portions of vertebra and fins: traces of the same fish have been recently observed at Lyme Regis. Nov. 18.—A letter was first read from Dr. Pingel of Copenhagen to the President, containing a notice of some facts showing the gradual sinking of part of the west coast of Greenland. The first observations which led to the supposition that the west coast of Greenland nad subsided, were made by Arctander between 1777 and 1779. He noticed, in the firth called Igalliko (lat. 60° 43’ N.), that a small, low, rocky island, about a gun-shot from the shore, was almost entirely submerged at spring tides, yet there were on it the walls of a house 52 feet in length, 30 feet in breadth, 5 feet thick, and 6 feet high. Half a century later, when Dr. Pingel visited the island, the whole of it was so far submerged that the ruins alone rose above the water. The colony of Julianahaab was founded at the mouth of the same firth in 1776; and near a rock, called the Castle by the Danish co- lonists, are the foundations of their storehouse, which are now dry only at very low water. The neighbourhood of the colony of Frederickehaab (lat. 62° N.), was once inhabited by Greenlanders ; but the only vestige of their dwelling is a heap of stones, over which the firth flows at high water. Near the well-known glacier which separates the district of Fre- Third Series. Vol. 8. No. 43. Jan. 1836. L 74 Geolog:cal Soctety. derickehaab from that of Fiskenass, is a group of islands called Fulluartalik, now deserted ; but on the shore are the ruins of winter dwellings, which are often overflowed. Half a mile to the west of the village of Fiskenass (lat. 63° 4’ N.), the Moravians founded, in 1758, the establishment called Lichtenfeld. In thirty or forty years they were obliged once, perhaps twice, or move the poles upon which they set their large boats, called Umiak, or Women’s boats. The old poles still remain as silent witnesses, but beneath the water. To the north-east of the mother colony, Godthaab (lat. 64° 10’ N.), is a point called Vildmansnass by St. Egede, the venerable apostle of the Greenlanders. In his time, 1721—1736, it was inhabited by several Greenland families, whose winter dwelling remains desolate and in ruins, the firth flowing into the house at high tide. Dr. Pin- gel says that no aboriginal Greenlander builds his house so near the water's edge. The points mentioned above the writer of the letter had visited ; but he adds, on the authority of a countryman of his own highly de- serving of credit, that at Napparsok, 10 Danish miles (45 miles En- glish) to the north of Ny-Sukkertop (lat. 65° 20' N.), the ruins of ancient Greenland winter houses are to be seen at low water. Dr. Pingel is not aware of any instance of subsidence in the more northern districts ; but he suspects that the phenomenon reaches at least as far as Disco Bay, or nearly to 69° north lat. Some notes by Capt. Fitzroy, R.N., read at a Court Martial at Portsmouth, Oct. 19th, 1835, on Capt. Seymour and his Officers for the loss of His Majesty’s Frigate Challenger, wrecked on the coast of Chili, near the port of Conception, and communicated to the Pre- sident by Capt. Beaufort, R.N., Hon Mem. G.S., were then read. These notes refer to the effects produced by the earthquake of Feb. 1835, in the currents on the coasts of Chili, from the Island of Mo- cha to the parallel of Conception. Capt. Fitzroy also mentions that the island of Santa Maria was elevated ten feet. A letter dated Valparaiso, 22nd of March 1835, from R. E. Alison, Esq., addressed to the President, on the earthquake of Chili of the 20th of February 1835, was then read. The earthquake began at quarter past 11 a.m. by a gentle heaving . or undulation of the earth ; but the motion increased in a few seconds to so great a degree that no person could stand. It destroyed the cities of Conception and Chillan, with the ports of Talcahuano and Maule, as well as above twenty smaller towns, and animmense num- ber of country houses. It was felt to the southward as far as the In- dian territory opposite the island of Chiloe ; to the northward be- yond Copiapo ; at Mendoza on the east of the Andes; by the crew of a ship 100 miles to the westward of the coast, and at Juan Fernandez 300 miles from it. At the port of Talcahuano the same phenomena occurred which ac- companied the destruction of Pencoin 1730 and 1751. Forty minutes after the first shock the sea suddenly retired so far that part of the bottom of the Boca chica, the smailer or southern entrance of the bay, Linnean Society. 75 could be seen ; but the sea afterwards returning through the same channel with a great bore, flowed 20 feet over the town, carrying everything before it. This phenomenon was repeated three times. Mr. Alison says that the sea was reported to have receded, or rather the land to have risen, 2 or 3 feet, a difference having also taken place in the soundings in the bay; and that a rock, which was invisible pre- viously to the earthquake, was afterwards near the surface. Large fissures are stated to have been made in the earth, and water to have burst from some of them: the earth is also said to have opened and closed ; and near Los Angeles several hills to have disappeared, and others to have opened and vomited steam and black smoke. The harbour of the island of Santa Maria was destroyed, and the sea retired between 300 and 400 yards, while the reefs which surrounded the greater part of the island are said to have entirely disappeared. At the island of Juan Fernandez phenomena occurred similar to those which accompanied the destruction of Talcahuano. About a league from the shore the sea appeared to boil, a high column of water was thrown into the air, when the sea retired so far that a number of old anchors and brass guns became visible ;_ but it soon returned with great violence, carrying off all the houses of the convicts. A volcano also burst forth at the point where the sea was first agitated. The brig Glanmalin was in the latitude of Talcahuano, and about 100 miles to the westward of it, at the time of the earthquake, when the crew felt a shock as if the vessel had struck upon a rock. Mr. Alison also mentions the existence near Valparaiso of the re- cent marine shells 1400 feet above the level of the sea, and of recent marine shells being dug near Conuco for the purpose of making lime. In the bay of Valparaiso, he says, a rock which in 1817 could be passed over in a boat, is now dry, except at spring tides. LINNEAN SOCIETY. Nov. 17.—A notice, by Mr. White was read, ofan individual of the Great Black Woodpecker (Picus martius of Linnzus,) having been shot in 1834 at Billingford, near Scole Inn, Norfolk. The stuffed specimen is in the possession of Mr. Drake, a farmer of that place. The bird was shot in a moist natural wood, where the Rhamnus Fran- gula and Viburnum Opulus abound. Another of the same species was seen at the same time. The conclusion of Mr. Don’s “Descriptions of Indian Gentianee” were then read. . Among the numerous families which compose the class of Dicoty- ledonous plants, there is perhaps none so equally and generally dis- tributed over the surface of the globe as the Gentianee, extending almost to the extremities of both hemispheres, and occurring in every intermediate region wherever the elevation of the land and other local circumstances favour their development. By a comparison of the Floras of different countries they appear to constitute the proportion of about | to 83 of the phenogamous vegetation. By the indefatigable researches of Dr. Wallich and Mr. Royle, the number of species. of this order belonging to the Indian Flora has been more than doubled, and they now amount to about 50. Of the 13 genera into which L2 76 Linnean Society. they have been distributed, Carscora, Exacum, Slevogtia, Crawfurdia, Agathotes, and Ophelia are exclusively Indian, and the remaining 7 are common to the European and Northern Asiatic Floras. Of these 50 species, 33 belong to the Alpine Flora, which, in 3500, the number at which the phenogamous plants of the Flora of Northern India may be estimated, will give a proportion equal to that above stated. ‘The author has confined himself in this paper to the description of the species found by Mr. Royle. We subjoin the new genera and species : Gen. 1. Gentiana. Borck. Brown. 1. G. contorta, annua; floribus solitariis, corolla infundibuliformi 5-loba: lobis lineari-oblongis obtusis zestivatione convolutis, dentibus calycinis lanceolatis acuminatis, foliis ellipticis obtusis 5-nerviis subsessilibus. Gen. 2. Preumonantae. Schmidt. 1. P. Kurroo, caulescens, subuniflora; dentibus calycinis elongatis subulatis, corolla campanulata : lebis acutis, foliis obtusis; radicalibus elongato- lanceolatis; caulinis linearibus. 2. P. depressa, subacaulis, ceespitosa, uniflora; dentibus calycinis ovato- lanceolatis mucronatis, corolla campanulata : lobis integerrimis aristatis, foliis lanceolatis mucronatis margine scabris ; surculinis obovatis. Gen. 3. Ertcata. Renealm. 1. FE. capitata, caulescens, simplex; foliis ovatis, floribus aggregatis, den- tibus calycinis ovatis mucronatis recurvis, corolla lobis ovatis obtusis : sinubus crenatis. 2. E. argentea, acaulis; foliis calycibusque lanceolatis mucrenatis condu- plicatis recurvis margine scarlosis, floribus fasciculatis, corolla lobis Ovatis acuminatis. 3. E. marginata, caulescens, ramosa ; foliis lanceclatis mucronulatis planis margine cartilagineis, floribus fasciculatis, dentibus calycinis ovato- lanceolatis mucronatis erectis, corolle lobis obtusis: sinubus acutis. 4. E. decemfida, caulescens, ramosa; dentibus calycinis subulatis mucronatis rectis, corolla lubis lanceolatis acuminatis: sinubus bidentatis, foliis radicalibus ovatis mucronatis maximis ; summis subulatis. 5. E. pedicellata, caulescens, ramosissima ; dentibus calycinis lanceolatis mucronatis revolutis, corolla lobis ovatis acuminatis : sinubus integris, foliis lanceolatis acuminatis, capsula longé stipitata. 6. E. canaliculata, caulescens, erecta, ramosa; segmentis calycinis cuneatis mucronatis, corollz lobis ovatis acutiusculis, foliis ovato-lanceolatis ob- tusis margine scabris. Gen. 4. Euvrytuaria. Renealm. 1, E. coronata, breviter caulescens; floribus aggregatis, corolla 10-loba : sinubus lobis subzequalibus ovatis uniformibus, foliis lanceolatis acutis margine cartilagineis. 2, E. pedunculata, caulescens, ramosa, diffusa; pedunculis elongatis fili- formibus unifloris, corolla 5-fida calyce ter longiore, laciniis calycinis ovatis obtusiusculis. 3. E. carinata, caulescens, simplex; foliis lanceolatis mucronatis carinatis, Horibus fasciculatis, corolla 10-loba: lobis lanceolatis acuminatis ; sinu- um duplo brevieribus argute denticulatis. Gen. 5. Craweurvia. Wall. 1. C. fasciculata, 2, C. speciosa, oe 7 _ a Linnean Society. i Gen. 6. Swertia. L. 1. S. speciosa, foliis oppositis connato-vaginantibus elliptico-oblongis acu- minatis 7-nerviis, floribus racemoso-paniculatis, corollz segmentis acu- minatis : glandulis connatis. 2. S. petiolata, foliis oppositis petiolatis oblongis obtusis 5-nerviis, floribus racemoso-paniculatis, corolla segmentis obtusis: glandulis distinctis filamentoso-ciliatis. 3. S. alternifolia, foliis alternis ! elliptico-oblongis acuminatis 7-nerviis basi vaginantibus, floribus racemoso-paniculatis, corolla segmentis ellipticis obtusis: glandulis orbiculatis contiguis. 4. S.cuneata, foliis oppositis petiolatis spathulato-oblongis obtusis 5-nerviis, floribus racemosis, corolla segmentis obtusis : glandulis lineari-oblon- gis subremotis filamentoso-ciliatis. 5. S. cerulea, floribus subsolitariis, ecrolle segmentis ovatis mucronulatis : glandulis linearibus distantibus, foliis inferioribus spathulatis petiola- tis ; superioribus calycibusque lanceolatis obtusiusculis. Gen. 7. AGATHOTES. 1. A. Chirayta, caule tereti, foliis ovato-lanceolatis, foveis nectariferis ob- longis distinctis : squamulis margine capillaceo-fimbriatis. 2. A. alata, eaule tetragono alato, foliis ovatis, fovea nectarifera orbicu- lata: squamula rotundata fimbriata. Gen. 8. OPHELIA. 1. O. angustifolia, floribus 4-fidis, foliis petiolatis lineari-lanceolatis agutis, segmentis calycinis linearibus mucronulatis, corollz laciniis ovatis acu- minatis calyce brevioribus. 2. O. pulchella, floribus 4-fidis, foliis lanceolato-linearibus acutis, segmen- tis calycinis lanceolatis acuminatis, corolla laciniis ovatis mucronu- latis calyce longioribus, caule tetragono. 3. O. paniculata, floribus 5-fidis, foliis linearibus scabris margine revolutis, petiolis ciliatis, segmentis calycinis lanceolatis acuminatis, corollze laciniis ovato-lanceolatis acuminatis calyce vix longioribus, caule tereti. 4. O. purpurascens, floribus 5-fidis, foliis lanceolatis acuminatis 3-nerviis scabris, petiolis ciliatis, segmentis calycinis lanceolatis mucronatis, co- rollz laciniis ovato-lenceolatis acuminatis basi bituberculatis calyce lon- gioribus, filamentis basi connatis, caule teretiusculo. 5. O. cordata, floribus 5-fidis, foliis sessilibus cordatis acutis 5-nerviis, seg- mentis calycinis ovato-lanceolatis acuminatis, corolla laciniis oblongis obtusiusculis calyce brevioribus. 6. 0. lurida, floribus 4-fidis, foliis superioribus cordatis acutis amplexicauli- bus, segmentis calycinis lineari-lanceolatis mucronulatis, corolla laci- niis ovatis acuminatis calyce longioribus. Gen. 9. Hatenta. Borck. 1. H. elliptica, corollis campanulatis 4-fidis calcaribus filiformibus breviori- bus, laciniis calycinis obtusis abbreviatis, foliis ellipticis obtusis 5-nerviis ; inferioribus petiolatis. Gen. 10. Enyrun®a. Renealm. 1. Z£. Roxburghii, floribus pedunculatis corymbosis, corolla laciniis lanceo- latis : tubo calycis longitudine, foliis superioribus jinearibus 3-nerviis, caule quadrangulo. 78 Cambridge Philosophical Society:—Sir John F. W. Herschel Gen. 11. Carscora. Lam. Brown. 1. C. diffusa. 2. C. decussata. 3. C. pusilla. Gen. 12. Exacum. L. Brown. 1. E. pedunculatum. 2. E. tetragonum. Gen. 13. Stevoetia. Reichend. 1. S. verticillata. _—_-—_—. CAMBRIDGE PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY. At the anniversary meeting on Friday, November 6th, 1835, the following officers were elected for the ensuing year : Dr. Clark, Trinity College, President ;— Professor Cumming, Tri- nity College ; Professor Sedgwick, Trinity Coliege ; Dr. F. Thackeray, Emanuel College, Vice-Presidents ;— Kev. G. Peacock, Trinity Coi- lege, Treasurer :—Rev. Professor Henslow, St. John’s College; Rev. W. Whewell, Trinity College; Rev, J. Lodge, Magdalen College, Secretaries ;—W. Hopkins, Esq., St. Peter’s College ; Rev. J. Hymers, St. John’s College; Dr. Haviland, St. John’s College; Rev. J. J. Smith, Caius College; Rev. S. Earnshaw, St. John’s College, Old Council ;—Rev. L. Jenyns, St. John’s College; Rev. R. Murphy, Caius College ; Rev. A. Thurtell, Caius College; C. C. Babington, Esq-, St. John’s College; Rev. H. Philpott, Catherine Hall, New Council. November 16.—After various presents of books and objects of natural history had been announced, a Memoir was read by the Rev. R. Murphy, ‘On the Resolution of Equations of Finite Differ- ences. Extracts were then read of letters from Sir J. Herschel to the Rev. W. Whewell, containing various meteorological observations, and especially some tending to show that the height of the barometer at the equator is less by about a quarter of an inch than it is at twenty or thirty degrees from it. The following are a portion of the extracts here referred to : ««The barometer certainly has a permanently and very decidedly lower mean ievel at and near the line. The strong upward current due to the circulation of the trades can alone account for this. Of the general fact I have no doubt, and however difficult it is to observe the barometer on shipboard, from the unusual quietness of our pas- sage, I think I can come pretty near to its true difference from that in our latitudes. The depression at the equator below that in lat. 20° may I think be stated at 0'2 nearly. « + 8, and will be a small quantity. Draw P R an arc of a great circle perpendicular to ZO E, and let from crystallized Surfaces. 107 ZR=p,PR=gq. Then we shall find from equation (4.), after various substitutions and reductions, 272 & = K cos* g (cos* $—cos*p); where K = (2 3 eres (5) In deducing this value of 8, the approximations were made with a tacit reference to the case of reflexion in air from a common rhomb of Iceland spar. The coefficient K, in this case, is equal to about nine degrees, and the resulting nume- rical values of the polarizing angles in various azimuths agree very well with your experiments. You will perceive that the value of 3 is the same in supplementary azimuths, which ex- plains the observation, cited in the beginning of my letter, re- lative to the equality of the polarizing angles at opposite sides of the perpendicular I Z in a given plane of incidence. When the point R falls upon O, we have 8 = 0, and7+4 equal to a right angle. Hence, when the cotangent of ZR is equal to the ordinary index, the tangent of the polarizing angle is equal to the same index. This theorem, though de- duced from an approximate equation, might be shown to be exact. When the axis of the crystal lies in the plane of incidence, we may obtain an exact expression for the polarizing angle. The condition of polarization then becomes a af 2__},2) cin dl 1 APR Bs) jl cos (2+ ¢')—(a°—0*) sin p' cos h ayia Age from which, by the proper substitutions, we obtain the fol- lowing expression : 0; (6.) - 9. 1—a® cos? A—B? sin? A sin? z.= a BP : (7.) where A denotes the complement of Z P, or the inclination of the axis to the face of the crystal, and z is the polarizing angle. This formula, in a shape somewhat different, was communi- cated, above a year ago, to Professor Lloyd, who has noticed it, in connexion with your paper, in his Report on Physical Optics. When a and become equal, the formula gives your law of the tangent for ordinary media. The foregoing results show that, when a ray is polarized by reflexion from a crystal, the plane of polarization deviates from the plane of incidence, except when the axis lies in the latter plane; and that the deviation may be made very great by placing the crystal in contact with a medium whose refractive power is nearly equal to that of the crystal it- self; for when z is nearly equal to ¢ or to 4, the divisor sin (t—¢) or sin ({(—9’) is TG small, and therefore tan 6 or 2 108 Mr. Fox’s further Remarks on the Magnetic Forces. tan 6! is very great. But this remark is of no value whatever in explaining the very singular phenomena which you have observed in the extreme case just mentioned ; nor can I ima- gine any reason why there should be a deviation, as there was in some of your experiments, when the axis lies in the plane of incidence, since everything is then alike on both sides of this plane. Indeed the whole of this subject, which occupies the latter part of your paper of 1819, is very extra- ordinary and interesting ; and I was glad to hear that you had resumed the investigation of it, and made many experiments which have not been published. I wish you would publish them. They seem to be of great importance in the present state of optical science. Tam, dear Sir, ever truly yours, Trin, Coll. Dublin, Dec. 22, 1835. J. MacCuiiacuH. XX. Some further Remarks on the Magnetic Forces. By R. W. Fox.* AM glad that Dr. Ritchie has noticed my remarks on the laws of the magnetic forces, because I hope that it will be the means of exciting more attention to the subject. I can- not, however, admit the justness of his conclusion, unless it can be shown that the results of my experiments are conform- able to the law of the inverse of the squares of the distances throughout the whole series of nine or ten removals of the magnet, calculating from any assumed points whatever in them. Dr. Ritchie has confined his calculations to only two or three distances. The magnets which I employed were cylinders of three inches long and one tenth of an inch in diameter, and at- tracted each other with half the force of contact when sepa- rated about 7,5 of aninch. From this minute distance to that of } and even +} of an inch, the results were nearlyt in accordance with the law of the simple inverse ratio of the di- stance, calculating from the contiguous surfaces of the mag- nets; and when the same bars were made more strongly magnetic, their force, at half an inch, much more nearly ap- proximated to the simple, than to the duplicate, inverse ratio of the distance. * Communicated by the Author. + Lhave used this qualifying word, because at very minute distances the diminution of the force did not seem to be quite equal to the inverse ratio of the distance; whereas it rather exceeded it towards the end of the series. At the distance of 3 of an inch, the force, in the case referred to, was about +7',5 of that of contact. On the Transmission of Calorific Rays. 109 Now, the question is, will it be possible to reconcile these facts with the latter law ? I found that when the magnets referred to, adhered to each other at their terminal edges only, as shown in the annexed figure, it requized a much greater force to separate them than when the two surfaces, or ends a, e, were together. This may, perhaps, be attributed to a better contact in the former case than in the latter; and I conceive that if the con- tact had been still more perfect, the force would have been reduced one half at less than z;',, of an inch. The fact, moreover, proves, I think, that the greatest force of magnets, when in contact at their dissimilar poles, is not fixed in their axes, or at any appreciable distance from their points of junction. Under these circumstances the distribution of their united forces is, I consider, much the same as it is in the case of a single magnet. as XXI. Remarks on M. Melloni’s and Professor Powell’s Papers on the Transmission of Calorific Rays, inserted in Lond. and. Edinb. Phil. Mag. for December 1835 and January 1836. By H. Hupson, M.D., M.R.L.A.* N referring to the remarks which M. Melloni has done me the honour to make relative to a communication which I read to the Physical Section of the British Association}, I beg to say, that I stated in the paper that I considered my experiments with the thermo-muitiplier as zmperfect, and merely mentioned them as indicating a method of determining a point on which some doubts were still entertained. I have since adopted the method alluded to, which has fully confirmed the correctness of M. Melloni’s observations; and as it appears capable of being advantageously employed in some branches of the investigation, I shall briefly describe it. ABCD isa square, mahogany board, on which two rectan- gular brass plates (each 4 inches wide), E FG H and FILK, are fixed (as in fig. 1, p. 110,) at right angles to each other and divided into half inches; at C MI O a plate of brass is fixed perpendicular to the board, forming a complete screen to T (the thermo-electric pile), except through a square opening (at N) equal to the section of the pile. A second brass screen EI is fixed in like manner perpendicular to the board, and * Communicated by tke Author. + An abstract of the communication here referred to will be found in Lond. and Edinb. Phil. Mag., vol, vii. p. 297.—Eprr. 110 Dr. H.Hudson’s Remarks on M. Melloni’s and forming at its base the hypothenuse of the right-angled isosceles triangle I F E; in this second brass screen there is a circular opening (P), about 23 inches in diameter, whose centre is im- mediately opposite to the centre of the square hole (N); both centres being in the avis of the pile, which is parallel to P Q, the central line of the brass plate E.G; to this circular opening a brass circle is attached (moveable round its centre and) having four screws (as in figure 2.) by means of which any substance intended to be used asa screen may be firmly fixed in the cir- cle. Brass plates are made which fit tightly into the circle, having rectangular pieces (of different sizes) cut out of their centres. : c rt eetho totson Sel Bey > OE Ti Or CSRS Having selected one of these plates (in which the opening is somewhat smaller than the crystal, or other substance in- tended to be used asa screen) it is fixed into the circle be- hind the screws (as in figure 3.) and the crystal is then fixed in front of it so as to completely cover the opening; the bot- tom of the canister (for containing hot water, &c.) is a right~ Prof. Powell’s Papers on the Transmission of Calorific Rays. 111 angled isosceles triangle, whose equal sides measure four inches, so that the canister being placed alternately in the different positions at R and S, it is evident that the lines drawn from any point of the radiating surface to a given point of the cry- stal are of equal length, and form the same angle with the cry- stal and canister in each case; while the other sides of the ca- nister cannot interfere with the effect. Under these circum- stances it would appear that any effect produced on the thermo- multiplier by the mere heating of the crystal should be pre- cisely; the same in both cases ; and any eacess of effect in the position R may be taken as the measure of the crystal’s dia- thermancy for the kind of heat which the canister radiates. The circle (in which the crystal is fixed) being moveable, the experiment can be repeated after turning the crystal round through 180° so as to verify the’ result. Having made use of the apparatus above described, in ad- dition to its furnishing abundant confirmation of M. Melloni’s statements, I think I have obtained a proof that rock crystal (about 3th of an inch thick) and other bodies, which are usually considered wholly impervious to the heat radiated from bodies at low temperatures, do transmit heat from a canister containing hot water, although the effect is obscured by the rapidity with which the crystal absorbs heat. I first put the canister as at S, and the needle almost (if not altogether) zn- stantaneously begins to move with a slow but rather steady motion, and at length stops (say) at 5°. The canister being removed the needle soon settles at zero again. ‘The canister is then placed at R, and immediately the needle begins to move (with more energy, however, than in the former case), and goes to 51°, from which it again returns to about 3°, and ultimately settles at 5°, as when the canister was at S. Thus, though there is no perceptible difference in the stati- cal effect, there appears to be a force acting on the needle at R (producing a larger are of vibration and in a shorter time) which, I believe, can only be attributed to rays of heat trans- mitted through the crystal. With regard to Professor Powell’s remarks on M. Melloni’s paper, in the Lond. and Edinb. Phil. Mag. for December, it appaers to me that the learned Professor has in some de- gree misapprehended M. Melloni’s observations. Professor Powell’s ingenious experiment went to prove that rays of heat issuing from aluminous heated body were transmitted freely, while those from a non-luminous source were apparently not so transmitted. The general fact on which Professor Powell founded the distinction M.Melloni admits, but he maintains (and on grounds 112 Prof. Powell’s Postscript on the Dispersion of Light. which I believe to. be incontestably true) that the distinction is not between Jumznous and obscure sources of heat, but between the kind of rays of heat emitted from bodies at different zempe- tures; and that the accident (as I may term it) of the bodies being at such a temperature that rays of light accompanied the rays of heat, has nothing whatever to do with the fact of the different transmissibilities of the calorific rays: 1st, Because the same difference of transmission exists between sources alto- gether obscure; 2nd, Because this difference (between lumin- ous and obscure sources) does not exist with reference to some bodies, e.g. rock salt; and, thirdly, in bodies emitting light, the quantity of heat transmitted is in no way proportional, either to the degree of light which accompanies it in the first instance, or to the quantity of light which passes through along with it. In reference to this subject, it is to be observed, that it is altogether erroneous to consider “ diathermancy” in the sci- ence of heat as analogous to * transparency” in optics ; for that property of bodies by which they stop (absorb) or transmit rays of a particular refrangibility or colour is the true analogue in the latter science. I suspect that this necessary distinction escaped Professor Powell’s attention when he alluded to M. Melloni’s hypothesis as “needless and contrary to all analogy ;” for in this view of the subject, the explanation which M. Melloni has given of the heat being more abundantly transmitted through succes- sive plates (of similar natures) is perfectly analogous to the effect of a succession of screens (of the same colour) on com- mon light. The “ diathermancy” of rock salt alone appears entitled to be compared with “ transparency” as used in optics. Stephen’s Green, Dublin, Jan. 9, 1836. XXII. On the Theory of Dispersion. By the Rev. B. Powell, MA., F.R.S., Sav. Prof. of Geometry, Oxford. EARNING that there is not room in this Number for the continuation I had proposed of the researches com- menced in the last, I am anxious meanwhile to make a brief remark on two points referred to in the last Number. I. Mr. Tovey in an excellent paper on the formula for di- spersion, introduces a most material simplification on M. Cau- chy’s process. I allude to this more particularly now, because the writer refers to the importance of not omitting the summa- tion. He will, I trust, find that the introduction of it as discussed in my paper (and still more when the continuation appears, ) will produce an entire accordance in our results. Prof. Powell’s Postscript on the Dispersion of Light. 113 II. In the Editors’ note appended to my paper (p. 28.) there is a reference to some investigations of M. Rudberg, pub- lished in a former volume of this Journal. I ought, perhaps, to have referred to those curious researches at an earlier pe- riod: but it will readily appear that they are quite distinct from mine. The author states at the commencement of his paper: “ In investigating the principle, according to which, for the explanation of the dispersion of light on the system of undulations, we must suppose that when the light passes from the air into a more refractive medium the length of the undu- lations are much contracted, in fact, much shorter,—I have found that the following relation appears to exist between the length of the undulation of a certain colour in the air and the corresponding one in any other substance :” L = a.1”; I being the length in air, Lin the medium, @ and m con- stant depending on the medium. He then takes Fraunhofer’s value of 7 for each ray, and assuming that they are diminished in proportion to the re- fractive power, proceeds to calculate L for the different media examined by Fraunhofer: and thence the refractive indices by the formula, which on this assumption follows from the former (N being the index) 1 N= ope and the resulting numbers certainly exhibit a very good agree- ment with those of observation. Now, with regard to the nature of the formula, it is to be observed that the author neither gives any theory from which it is deduced, nor a reference to any other paper, or investiga- tion of such theory; and the form of it is such as would ap- pear extremely unlikely to have any connexion with the ana- lysis of undulations. Again, had any such investigation either of the author or of any other philosopher been in existence, it is hardly conceivable that it could have remained since 1827, without becoming known to some, at least, of the numerous mathematicians in all parts of Europe who have since that period been directing their attention to the subject. But further, (unless I greatly mistake the author’s meaning, ) it appears to me from the very form of expression used in the passage above quoted, that the formula is not derived from any theory of undulations: for when, he says, “ In investigating, &c....... Lhave found, ......” the meaning really seems to me simply this; that in attempting such an investigation on the undulatory theory he had not been able to succeed in obtain- ing any theoretical relation between the yelocity of a waye, and 114 Dr. Faraday’s Experimental Researches in Electricity. its length: but that EmprricaLty he found upon a compari- son of numerical results, “ that this relation appears to sub- sist,” which is expressed by the above formula. Such is the impression which the passage conveys to my mind; and, in- deed, the tenor of the whole confirms it. I can only add, that I should be truly glad to have pointed out any deduction from theory which would give so simple a formula. Considered as an empirical law, it certainly merits great attention. But thus much will be at once evident,—it is totally independent of M. Cauchy’s principles, and of my results de- duced and calculated on those principles. Oxford, Jan. 6, 1836. XXIII. Experimental Researches in Electricity.—Tenth Se- ries. By Micuaret Farapay, D.C.L. F.R.S. Fullerian Prof. Chem. Royal Institution, Corr. Memb. Royal and Imp. Acadd. of Sciences, Paris, Petersburgh, Florence, Copen- hagen, Berlin, &c. &c.* § 16. On an improved form of the Voltaic Battery. § 17. Some practical results respecting the construction and use of the Voltaic Battery. 1119; l HAVE lately had occasion to examine the voltaic trough practically, with a view to improvements in its construction and use; and though I do not pretend that the results have anything like the importance which attaches to the discovery of a new law or principle, I still think they are valuable, and may therefore, if briefly told, and in connexion with former papers, be worthy the approbation of the Royal Society. § 16. On an improved form of the Voltaic Battery. 1120. In a simple voltaic circuit (and the same is true of the battery) the chemical forces which, during their activity, give power to the instrument, are generally divided into two portions; the one of these is exerted locally, whilst the other is transferred round the circle (947. 996.) ; the latter consti- tutes the electric current of the instrument, whilst the former is altogether lost or wasted. ‘The ratio of these two portions of power may be varied to a great extent by the influence of circumstances: thus, in a battery not closed, all the action is local; in one of the ordinary construction, much is in circula- * From the Philosophical Transactions for 1835, Part [I]. This paper was received by the Royal Society June 16th, and read June 18th, 1835. [+ The paragraphs of the author’s former series of Researches here refer- red to, from 875 to 1047 both inclusive, belong to his Eighth Series, re- printed in Lond, and Edinb, Phil. Mag., vol. vi. p. 34 et seg. —Enir. ] On an improved Form of the Voltaic Battery. 115 tion when the extremities are in communication; and in the perfect one, which I have described (1001.), ad/ the chemical power circulates and becomes electricity. By referring to the quantity of zinc dissolved from the plates (865.* 1126.), and the quantity of decomposition effected in the volta-electrometer (711. 1126.) or elsewhere, the proportions of the local and transferred actions under any particular circumstances can be ascertained, and the efficacy of the voltaic arrangement, or the waste of chemical power at its zinc plates, be accurately deter- mined. 1121. Ifa voltaic battery were constructed of zine and pla- tina, the latter metal surrounding the former, as in the double copper arrangement, and the whole being excited by dilute sulphuric acid, then no insulating divisions of glass, porcelain, or air would be required between the contiguous platina sur- faces ; and, provided these did not touch metallically, the same acid which, being between the zinc and platina, would excite the battery into powerful action, would, between the two sur- faces of platina, produce no discharge of the electricity, nor cause any diminution of the power of the trough. ‘This is a necessary consequence of the resistance to the passage of the current which I have shown occurs at the place of decompo- sition (1007. 1011.); for that resistance is fully able to stop the current, and therefore act as insulation to the electricity of the contiguous plates, in as much as the current which tends to pass between them never has a higher intensity than that due to the action of a single pair. 1122. If the metal surrounding the zinc be copper (1045.), and if the acid be nitrosulphuric acid (1020.), then a slight discharge between the two contiguous coppers does take place, provided there be no other channel open by which the forces may circulate: but when such a channel is permitted, the re- turn discharge of which I speak is exceedingly diminished, in accordance with the principles laid down in the eighth series of these Researches. 1123. Guided by these principles I was led to the construc- tion of a voltaic trough, in which the coppers, passing round both surfaces of the zincs, as in Wollaston’s construction, should not be separated from each other except by an inter- vening thickness of paper, or in some other way, so as to pre- vent metallic contact, and should thus constitute an instrument compact, powerful, economical, and easy of use. On examin- ing, however, what had been done before, I found that the (* The paragraphs referred to from 661 to 874 will be found in Mr. Fa- raday’s Seventh Series, reprinted in Lond. and Edinb. Phil. Mag., vol. y. p- 161, et seq.—En1r. | 116 Dr. Faraday’s Experimental Researches in Electricity. new trough was in all essential respects the same as that in- vented and described by Dr. Hare, Professor in the Univer- sity of Pennsylvania, to whom I have great pleasure in re- ferring it. 1124. Dr. Hare has fully described his trough*. In it the contiguous copper plates are separated by thin veneers of wood, and the acid is poured on to, or off, the plates by a quarter revolution of an axis, to which both the trough con- taining the plates, and another trough to collect and hold the liquid, are fixed. ‘This arrangement I have found the most convenient of any, and have therefore adopted it. My zinc plates were cut from rolled metal, and when soldered to the copper plates had the form delineated, fig. 1. These were then bent over a gauge into the form fig. 2., and when packed in the wooden box constructed to receive them, were arranged as in fig. 34, little plugs of cork being used to keep the zine Fig. 1. plates from touching the copper plates, and a single or double thickness of cartridge paper being interposed between the con- tiguous surfaces of copper to prevent them from coming in contact. Such wes the facility afforded by this arrangement, that a trough of forty pairs of plates could be unpacked in five minutes, and repacked again in half an hour; and the whole series was not more than fifteen inches in length. 1125. This trough, of forty pairs of plates three inches * Philosophical Magazine, 1824, vol. Ixiii. p. 241; or Silliman’s Journal, vol. vii. See also a previous paper by Dr. Hare, Annals of Philosophy [Second Series], 1821, vol. i. p. 329, [also Phil. Mag., First Series, vol. lvii. p- 284.] in which he speaks of the non-necessity of insulation between the coppers. + The papers between the coppers are, for the sake of distinctness, omitted in the figure, Estimation of Voltaic Energy by Equivalents. 117 square, was compared, as to the ignition of a platina wire, the discharge between points of charcoal, the shock on the human frame, Xc., with forty pairs of four-inch plates having double coppers, and used in porcelain troughs divided into insulating cells, the strength of the acid employed to excite both being the same. Inall these effects the former appeared quite equal to the latter. On comparing a second trough of the new con- struction, containing twenty pairs of four-inch plates, with twenty pairs of four-inch plates in porcelain troughs, excited by acid of the same strength, the new trough appeared to sur- pass the old one in producing these effects, especially in the ignition of wire. 1126. In these experiments the new trough diminished in its energy much more rapidly than the one on the old con- struction; and this was a necessary consequence of the smaller quantity of acid used to excite it, which in the case of the forty pairs new construction was only one seventh part of that used for the forty pairs in the porcelain troughs. ‘To compare, thérefore, both forms of the voltaic trough in their decompos- ing powers, and to obtain accurate data as to their relative values, experiments of the following kind were made. ‘The troughs were charged with a known quantity of acid of a known strength; the electric current was passed through a volta-electrometer (711.) having electrodes 4 inches long and 23 inches in width, so as to oppose as little obstruction as possible to the current; the gases evolved were collected and measured, and gave the quantity of water decomposed. Then the whole of the charge used was mixed together, and a known part of it analysed, by being precipitated and boiled with ex- cess of carbonate of soda, and the precipitate well washed, dried, ignited, and weighed. In this way the quantity of metal oxidized and dissolved by the acid was ascertained; and the part removed from each zinc plate, or from all the plates, could be estimated and compared with the water decomposed in the volta-electrometer. ‘To bring these to one standard of com- parison, I have reduced the results so as to express the loss at the plates in equivalents of zinc for the equivalent of water decomposed at the volta-electrometer: I have taken the equi- valent number of water as 9, and of zinc as 32°5, and have considered 100 cubic inches of the mixed oxygen and hydro- gen, as they were collected over a pneumatic trough, to result from the decomposition of 12°68 grains of water. 1127. The acids used in these experiments were three,—sul- phuric, nitric, and muriatic. The sulphuric acid was strong oil of vitriol ; one cubical inch of it was equivalent to 486 grains of marble. The nitric acid was very nearly pure; one cubical inch dissolved 150 grains of marble. The muriatic acid was 118 Dr. Faraday’s Experimental Researches in Electricity. also nearly pure, and one cubical inch dissolved 108 grains of marble. These were always mixed with water by volumes, the standard of volume being a cubical inch. 1128. An acid was prepared consisting of 200 parts water, 41 parts sulphuric acid, and 4 parts nitric acid ; and with this both my trough, containing forty pairs of three-inch plates, and four porcelain troughs, arranged in succession, each con- taining ten pairs of plates with double coppers four inches square, were charged. These two batteries were then used in succession, and the action of each was allowed to continue for twenty or thirty minutes, until the charge was nearly ex- hausted, the connexion with the volta-electrometer being care- fully preserved during the whole time, and the acid in the troughs occasionally mixed together. In this way the former trough acted so well, that for each equivalent of water decom- posed in the volta-electrometer only from 2 to 2°5 equivalents of zinc were dissolved from each plate. In four experiments the average was 2°21 equivalents for each plate, or 88°4 for the whole battery. In the experiments with the porcelain troughs, the equivalents of consumption at each plate were 3°54, or 141°6 for the whole battery. In a perfect voltaic battery of forty pairs of plates (991. 1001.) the consumption would have been one equivalent for each zinc plate, or forty for the whole. 1129. Similar experiments were made with two voltaic batteries, one containing twenty pairs of four-inch plates, ar- ranged as I have described (1124.), and the other twenty pairs of four-inch plates in porcelain troughs. The average of five experiments with the former was a consumption of 3°7 equiva- lents of zinc from each plate, or 74 from the whole: the average of three experiments with the latter was 5°5 equivalents from each plate, or 110 from the whole: to obtain this conclusion, two experiments were struck out, which were much against the porcelain troughs, and in which some unknown deteriorat- ing influence was supposed to be accidentally active. In all the experiments, care was taken not to compare zew and old plates together, as that would have introduced serious errors into the conclusions (1146.). 1130. When ten pairs of the new arrangement were used, the consumption of zinc at each plate was 6°76 equivalents, or 67°6 for the whole. With ten pairs of the common construc- tion, in a porcelain trough, the zinc oxidized was, upon an average, 15°5 equivalents each plate, or 155 for the entire trough. 1131. No doubt, therefore, can remain of the equality or even the great superiority of this form of voltaic battery over the best previously in use, namely, that with double coppers, in which the cells are insulated. The insulation of the cop- Advantages of Hare’s Trough. 119 pers may therefore be dispensed with; and it is that circum- stance which principally permits of such other alterations in the construction of the trough as gives it its practical advan- tages. 1132. The advantages of this form of trough are very nu- merous and great. i. It is exceedingly compact, for 100 pairs of plates need not occupy a trough of more than three feet in Jeneth. ii. By Dr. Hare’s plan of making the trough turn upon copper pivots which rest upon copper bearings, the latter afford fixed terminations; and these I have found it very con- venient to connect with two cups of mercury, fastened in the front of the stand of the instrument. These fixed terminations give the great advantage of arranging an apparatus to be used in connexion with the battery before the latter is put into ac- tion. iii. The trough is put into readiness for use in an instant, a single jug of dilute acid being sufficient for the charge of 100 pairs of four-inch plates. iv. On making the trough pass through a quarter of a revolution, it becomes active, and the great advantage is obtained of procuring for the experiment the effect of the first contact of the zinc and acid, which is twice or sometimes even thrice that which the battery can pro- duce a minute or two after (1036. 1150.). v. When the ex- ' periment is completed, the acid can be at once poured from between the plates, so that the battery is never left to waste during an unconnected state of its extremities ; the acid is not unnecessarily exhausted; the zinc is not uselessly consumed ; and, besides avoiding these evils, the charge is mixed and ren- dered uniform, which produces a great and good result (1039.); and, upon proceeding to a second experiment, the important effect of first contact is again obtained. vi. The saving of zinc is very great. It is not merely that, whilst in action, the zinc performs more voltaic duty (1128. 1129.), but a// the destruc- tion which takes place with the ordinary forms of battery be- tween the experiments is prevented. This saving is of such extent that I estimate the zinc in the new form of battery to be thrice as effective as that in the ordinary form. vii. The importance of this saving of metal is not merely that the value of the zinc is saved, but that the battery is much lighter and more manageable; and also that the surfaces of the zinc and copper plates may be brought much nearer to each other when the battery is constructed, and remain so until it is worn out: the latter is a very important advantage (1148.). viii, Again, as, in consequence of the saving, thinner plates will perform the duty of thick ones, rolled zinc may be used; and I have found rolled zinc superior to cast zinc in action ; a superiority which I incline to attribute to its greater purity (1144.). ix. Another advantage is obtained in the economy of the acid 120 Dr. Faraday’s Experimental Researches in Electricity. used, which is proportionate to the diminution of the zinc dis- solved. x. The acid also is more easily exhausted, and is in such small quantity that there is never any occasion to re- turn an old charge into use. Such old acid, whilst out of use, often dissolves portions of copper from the black flocculi usu- ally mingled with it, which are derived from the zinc; now any portion of copper in solution in the charge does great harm, because, by the local action of the acid and zinc, it tends to precipitate upon the latter, and diminish its voltaic efficacy (1145.). xi. By using a due mixture of nitric and sulphuric acid for the charge (1139.), no gas is evolved from the troughs; so that a battery of several hundred pairs of plates may, with- out inconvenience, be close to the experimenter. xii. If, dur- ing a series of experiments, the acid becomes exhausted, it can be withdrawn, and replaced by other acid with the utmost fa- cility ; and after the experiments are concluded, the great ad- vantage of easily washing the plates is at command. And it appears to me, that in place of making, under different circum- stances, mutual sacrifices of comfort, power, and economy, to obtain a desired end, all are at once obtained by Dr. Hare’s form of trough. 1133. But there are some disadvantages which I have not yet had time to overcome, though I trust they will finally be conquered. One is the extreme difficulty of making a wooden trough constantly water-tight under the alternations of wet and dry to which the voltaic instrument is subject. To remedy this evil, Mr. Newman is now engaged in obtaining porcelain troughs. The other disadvantage is a precipitation of copper on the zinc plates. It appears to me to depend mainly on the circumstance that the papers between the coppers retain acid when the trough is emptied; and that this acid slowly acting on the copper, forms a salt, which gradually mingles with the next charge, and is reduced on the zinc plate by the local ac- tion (1120.): the power of the whole battery is then reduced. I expect that by using slips of glass to separate the coppers at their edges, their contact can be sufficiently prevented, and the space between them be left so open that the acid ofa charge can be poured and washed out, and so be removed from every part: of the trough when the experiments in which it is used are completed. 1134. The actual superiority of the troughs which I have constructed on this plan, I believe to depend, first and prin- cipally, on the closer approximation of the zinc and copper surfaces ;—in my troughs they are only one tenth of an inch apart (1148.) ;—and, next, on the superior quality of the rolled zinc above the cast zinc used in the construction of the ordi- nary pile. It cannot be that insulation between the contigu- Nature and Strength of the Battery Acid. 121 ous coppers is a disadvantage, but I do not find that it is any advantage; for when, with both the forty pairs of three-inch plates and the twenty pairs of four-inch plates, I used papers well imbibed with wax%, these being so large that when folded at the edges they wrapped over each other, so as to make cells as insulating as those of the porcelain troughs, still no sensible advantage in the chemical action was obtained. 1185. As, upon principle, there must be a discharge of part of the electricity from the edges of the zinc and copper plates at the sides of the trough, I should prefer, and intend having, troughs constructed with a plate or plates of crown glass at the sides of the trough: the bottom will need none, though to glaze that and the ends would be no disadvantage, The plates need not be fastened in, but only set in their places ; nor need they be in large single pieces. § 17. Some practical results respecting the construction and use of the Voltaic Battery. 1136. The electro-chemical philosopher is well acquainted with some practical results obtained from the voltaic battery by MM. Gay-Lussac and Thenard, and given in the first forty- five pages of their Recherches Physico-chimiques. Although the following results are generally of the same nature, yet the advancement made in this branch of science of late years, the knowledge of the definite action of electricity, and the more accurate and philosophical mode of estimating the results by the equivalents of zinc consumed, will be their sufficient justi- fication. 1137. Nature and strength of the acid.—My battery of forty pairs of three-inch plates was charged with acid consisting of 200 parts water and 9 oil of vitriol. Each plate lost, in the average of the experiments, 4°66 equivalents, or the whole battery 186°4 equivalents, of zinc, for the equivalent of water decomposed in the volta-electrometer. Being charged with a mixture of 200 water and 16 of the muriatic acid, each plate lost 3°8, or the whole battery 152, equivalents of zinc for the water decomposed. Being charged with a mixture of 200 water and 8 nitric acid, each plate lost 1°35, or the whole bat- tery 74°16, equivalents of zinc for one equivalent of water de- composed. ‘The sulphuric and muriatic acids evolved much hydrogen at the plates in the trough; the nitric acid no gas whatever. ‘he relative strengths of the original acids have already been given (1127.); but a difference in that respect * A single paper thus prepared could insulate the electricity of a trough of forty pairs of plates. Third Series, Vol. 8. No. 45. Feb, 1836. ‘192 Dr. Faraday’s Experimental Researches in Electricity. makes no important difference in the results when thus.ex- pressed by equivalents (1140.). 1138. Thus nitric acid proves to be the best for this purpose: its superiority appears to depend upon its favouring the elec- trolization of the liquid in the cells of the trough upon the principles already explained (905. 973. 1022.), and conse- quently favouring the transmission of the electricity, and there- fore the production of transferable power (1120.). 1139. The addition of nitric acid might, consequently, be expected to improve sulphuric and muriatic acids. Accord- ingly, when the same trough was charged with a mixture of 200 water, 9 oil of vitriol, and 4 nitric acid, the consumption of zinc was at each plate 2°786, and for the whole battery 111°5 equivalents. When the charge was 200 water, 9 oil of vitriol, and 8 nitric acid, the loss per plate was 2°26, or for the whole battery 90°4, equivalents. When the trough was charged with a mixture of 200 water, 16 muriatic acid, and 6 nitric acid, the loss per plate was 2°11, or for the whole battery 84°4, equivalents. Similar results were obtained with my bat- tery of twenty pairs of four-inch plates (1129.). Hence it is evident that the nitric acid was of great service when mingled with the sulphuric acid; and the charge generally used after this time for ordinary experiments consisted of 200 water, 4 oil of vitriol, and 4 nitric acid. 1140. It is not to be supposed that the different strengths of the acids produced the differences above ; for within certain limits I found the electrolytic effects to be nearly as the strengths of the acids, so as to leave the expression of force, when given in equivalents, nearly constant. Thus, when the trough was charged with a mixture of 200 water and 8 nitric acid, each plate lost 1°854 equivalent of zinc. When the charge was 200 water and 16 nitric acid, the loss per plate was 1°82 equi- valent. When it was 200 water and 32 nitric acid, the loss was 2°1 equivalents. The differences here are not greater than happen from unavoidable irregularities, depending on other causes than the strength of acid. . 1141. Again, when a charge consisting of 200 water, 43 oil of vitriol, and 4 nitric acid was used, each zinc plate lost 2°16 equivalents; when the charge with the same battery was 200 water, 9 oil of vitriol, and 8 nitric acid, each zinc plate lost 2°26 equivalents. 1142. I need hardly say that no copper is dissolved during the regular action of the voltaic trough. I have found that much ammonia is formed in the cells when nitric acid, either pure or mixed with sulphuric acid, is used. It is produced in part as a secondary result at the cathodes (663.) of the dif- 74 Uniformity of the Charge.—New and old Plates. 123 ferent portions of fluid constituting the necessary electrolyte, in the cells. 1143. Uniformity of the charge.—This is a most important point, as I have already shown experimentally (1042. &c.). Hence one great advantage of Dr. Hare’s mechanical arrange- ment of his trough. 1144. Purity of the zinc.—If pure zinc could be obtained, it would be very advantageous in the construction of the vol- - taic apparatus (998.). . Most zincs, when put into dilute sul- phuric acid, leave more or less of an insoluble matter upon the surface in the form of a crust, which contains various me- tals, as copper, lead, zinc, iron, cadmium, &c., in the metallic state. Such particles, by discharging part of the transferable power, render it, as to the whole battery, local; and so dimi- nish the effect. As an indication connected with the more or less perfect action of the battery, I may mention that no gas ought to rise from the zinc plates. ‘The more gas which is generated upon these surfaces, the greater is the local action and the less the transferable force. ‘The investing crust is also inconvenient, by preventing the displacement and renewal of the charge upon the surface of the zinc. Such zinc as, dis- solving in the cleanest manner in a dilute acid, dissolves also the slowest, is the best; zinc which contains much copper should especially be avoided. I have generally found rolled Liege or Mosselman’s zinc the purest; and to that circum- stance attribute in part the advantage of the new battery (1134.). 1145. Foulness of the zinc plates.—After use, the plates of a battery should be cleaned from the metallic powder upon their surfaces, especially if they are employed to obtain the laws of action of the battery itself. This precaution was al- ways attended to with the porcelain trough batteries in the experiments described (1125. &c.). If a few foul plates. are mingled with many clean ones, they make the action in the different cells irregular, and the transferable power is-accord- ingly diminished, whilst the local and wasted power is in- creased. No old charge containing copper should be used to excite a battery. _ 1146. New and old plates.—I1 have found voltaic batteries far more powerful when the plates were new than when they have been used two or three times; so that a new and a used battery cannot be compared together, or even a battery with itself on the first and after times of use. My trough of twenty pairs of four-inch plates, charged with acid consisting of 200 water, 4} oil of vitriol, and 4 nitric acid, lost, upon the first time of being used, 2°32 sane per plate. When used 2 124 Dr. Faraday’s Experimental Researches in Electricity. after the fourth time with the same charge, the loss was from 3°26 to 4°47 equivalents per plate; the average being 3°7 equi- valents. The first time the forty pair of plates (1124.) were _ used, the loss at each plate was only 1°65 equivalent; but afterwards it became 2°16, 2°17, 2°52. The first time twenty pair of four-inch plates in porcelain troughs were used, they lost, per plate, only 3°7 equivalents; but after that, the loss was 5°25, 5°36, 5°9 equivalents. Yet in all these cases the zincs had been well cleaned from adhering copper, &c., before each trial of power. 1147. With the rolled zinc the fall in force soon appeared to become constant, i. e. to proceed no further. But with the cast zinc plates belonging to the porcelain troughs, it appeared to continue, until at last, with the same charge, each plate lost above twice as much zinc for a given amount of action as at first. These troughs were, however, so irregular that I could not always determine the circumstances affecting the amount of electrolytic action. 1148. Vicinity of the copper and zinc.—The importance of this point in the construction of voltaic arrangements, and the greater power, as to immediate action, which is obtained when the zinc and copper surfaces are near to each other than when removed further apart, are well known. I find that the power is not only greater on the instant, but also that the sum of transferable power, in relation to the whole sum of chemical action at the plates, is much increased. The cause of this gain is very evident. Whatever tends to retard the circulation of the transferable force, (i. e. the electricity, ) diminishes the pro- portion of such force, and increases the proportion of that which is local (996. 1120.). Now the liquid in the cells pos- sesses this retarding power, and therefore acts injuriously, in greater or less proportion, according to the quantity of it be- tween the zinc and copper plates, i.e. according to the di- stances between their surfaces. A trough, therefore, in which the plates are only half the distance asunder at which they are placed in another, will produce more transferable, and less local, force than the latter; and thus, because the electrolyte in the cells can transmit the current more readily, both the intensity and quantity of electricity is increased for a given consumption of zinc. To this circumstance mainly I attribute the superiority of the trough I have described (1134.). 1149. The superiority of double coppers over single plates also depends in part upon diminishing the resistance offered by the electrolyte between the metals. For, in fact, with dou- ble coppers the sectional area of the interposed acid becomes nearly double that with single coppers, and therefore it more First Immersion of the Plates—Their Number. 125 freely transfers the electricity. Double coppers are, however, effective, mainly because they virtually double the acting sur- face of the zinc, or nearly so; for in a trough with single cop- per plates and the usual construction of cells, that surface of zine which is not opposed to a copper surface is thrown almost entirely out of voltaic action, yet the acid continues to act upon it and the metal is dissolved, producing very little more than local effect (947. 996.). But when by doubling the cop- per, that metal is opposed to the second surface of the zinc plate, then a great part of the action upon the latter is con- verted into transferable force, and thus the power of the trough as to quantity of electricity is highly exalted. 1150. First immersion of the plates.—The great effect pro- duced at the first immersion of the plates, (apart from their being new or used (1146.),) I have attributed elsewhere to the unchanged condition of the acid in contact with the zinc plate (1003. 1037.): as the acid becomes neutralized, its exciting ‘power is proportionably diminished. Hare’s form of trough secures much advantage of this kind, by mingling the liquid, and bringing what may be considered as a fresh surface of acid against the plates every time it is used immediately after a rest. 1151. Number of plates*.—The most advantageous num- ber of plates in a battery used for chemical decomposition, depends almost entirely upon the resistance to be overcome at the place of action; but whatever that resistance may be, there is a certain number which is more ceconomical than either a greater or a less. Ten pairs of four-inch plates in a porcelain trough of the ordinary construction, acting in the volta-electrometer (1126.) upon dilute sulphuric acid of spec. gray. 1°314, gave an average consumption of 15:4 equivalents per plate, or 154 equivalents on the whole. Twenty pairs of the same plates, with the same acid, gave only a consump- tion of 5°5 per plate, or 110 equivalents upon the whole. When forty pairs of the same plates were used, the consump- tion was 3°54 equivalents per plate, or 141°6 upon the whole battery. Thus the consumption of zinc arranged as twenty plates was more advantageous than if arranged either as ten or as forty. 1)52. Again, ten pairs of my four-inch plates (1129.) lost 6°76 each, or the whole ten 67°6 equivalents of zinc, in effect- ing decomposition; whilst twenty pairs of the same plates, excited by the same acid, lost 3°7 equivalents each, or on the whole 74 equivalents. In other comparative experiments of numbers, ten pairs of the three-inch plates (1125.) lost 3°725, * Gay-Lussac and Thenard, Recherches Physico-chimiques, tom. i. p. 29. 126 Dr. Faraday’s Experimental Researches in Electricity. or 37°25 equivalents upon the whole; whilst twenty pairs lost 2°53 each, or 50°6 in all; and forty pairs lost on an average 2°21, or 88°4 altogether. In both these cases, therefore, in- crease of numbers had not been advantageous as to the effec- tive production of transferable chemical power from the whole quantity of chemical force active at the surfaces of excitation 1120.). 1153. But if I had. used a weaker acid or a worse con- ductor in the volta-electrometer, then the number of plates which would produce the most advantageous effect would have risen; or if I had used a better conductor than that really employed in the volta-electrometer, I might have re- duced the number even to one; as, for instance, when a thick wire is used to complete the circuit (865. &c.). And the cause of these variations is very evident, when it is considered that each successive plate ‘in the voltaic apparatus does not add anything to the quantity of transferable power or electri- city which the first plate can put into motion, provided a good conductor be present, but tends only to exalt the zntenszty of that quantity, so as to make it more able to overcome the ob- struction of bad conductors (994. 1158.). 1154. Large or small plates*.—The advantageous use of large or small plates for electrolyzations will evidently depend upon the facility with which the transferable power or electri- city can pass. If in a particular case the most effectual num- ber of plates is known (1151.), then the addition of more zine would be most advantageously made in increasing the size of the plates, and not their number. At the same time, large increase in the size of the plates would raise in a small degree the most favourable number. 1155. Large and small plates should not be used together in the same battery: the small ones occasion a loss of the power of the large ones, unless they be excited by an acid proportionably more powerful; for with a certain acid they cannot transmit the same portion of electricity in a given time which the same acid can evolve by action on the larger plates. 1156. Simultaneous decompositions. When the number of plates in a battery much surpasses the most favourable pro- portion (1151—1153.), two or more decompositions may be effected simultaneously with advantage. ‘Thus my forty pairs of plates (1124.) produced in one volta-electrometer 22°8 eubic inches of gas. Being recharged exactly in the same manner, they produced in each of two volta-electrometers 24 * Gay-Lussac and Thenard, Recherches Physico-chimiques, tom. i. p. 29. Effect of largeand smallPlates : Simultaneous Decompositions.127 cubical inches. In the first experiment the whole consump- tion of zinc was 88"4 equivalents, and in the second only 48°28 equivalents, for the whole of the water decomposed in both volta-electrometers. 1157. But when the twenty pairs of four-inch plates (1129.) were tried in a similar manner, the results were in the oppo- site direction. With one volta-electrometer 52 cubic inches of gas were obtained; with two, only 14°6 cubic inches from each. The quantity of charge was not the same in both cases, though it was of the same strength ; but on rendering the re- sults comparative by reducing them to equivalents (1126.), +t was found that the consumption of metal in the first case was 74, and in the second case 97, equivalents for the whole of the water decomposed. These results of course depend upon the same circumstances of retardation, &c., which have been referred to in speaking of the proper number of plates (1151.). 1158. That the transferring, or, as it is usually called, con- ducting, power of an electrolyte which is to be decomposed, or other interposed body, should be rendered as good as pos- sible*, is very evident (1020. 1120.). With a perfectly good conductor and a good battery, nearly all the electricity is passed, i. e. nearly all the chemical power becomes transfer- able, even with a single pair of plates (867.). With an inter-~ posed non-conductor none of the chemical power becomes transferable. With an imperfect conductor more or less of the chemical power becomes transferable as the circumstances favouring the transfer of forces across the imperfect conductor are exalted or diminished: these circumstances are, actual increase or improvement of the conducting power, enlarge- ment of the electrodes, approximation of the electrodes, and increased intensity of the passing current. 1159. The introduction of common spring water in place of one of the volta-electrometers used with twenty pairs of four-inch plates (1156.) caused such obstruction as not to al- low one fifteenth of the transferable force to pass which would have circulated without it. Thus fourteen fifteenths of the available force of the battery were destroyed, being converted into local force, (which was rendered evident by the evolution of gas from the zines,) and yet the platina electrodes in the water were three inches long, nearly an inch wide, and not a quarter of an inch apart. 1160. These points, i. e. the increase of conducting power, * Gay-Lussac and Thenard, Recherches Physico-chimiques, tom. i. pp. 13, 15, 22. 128 Mr. Grant on protecting Iron from the Action of Salt Water. the enlargement of the electrodes, and their approximation, should be especially attended to in volta-electrometers. The principles upon which their utility depend are so evident that there can be no occasion for further development of them here. Me: Royal Institution, Oct. 11, 1834. XXIV. Experiments on the Protection of Iron from the Action of Salt-Water. By 'T. Tassert Grant, Esq. To the Editors of the Philosophical Magazine and Journal. GENTLEMEN, wits reference to the interesting papers which appear in your Journal of the present month (November 1835, vol. vii. pp. 389, 391.) giving an account of som eexperiments recently made with the view of protecting iron from the action of salt water, &c., I beg leave to communicate, that for some months past I have myself been engaged in a series of very si- milar experiments. My attention was drawn to the subject with the view of obtaining a remedy for the great wear and tear arising from the oxidation of the iron tanks at present generally used in the Navy for the stowage of fresh water. I first fitted a small plate of zinc, 3 inches square, ;';th of an inch thick, with iron rivets, to a piece of sheet iron 6 inches square, the two metals being completely in contact, and immersed the same into six gallons of spring water ; at the same time I also immersed a piece of sheet iron of the same dimensions, without the zinc, into the same quantity and quality of water: at the expiration of thirty days the two pieces of iron presented nearly the same appearance, viz. oxidation was perceivable, and to the same extent in both. I repeated the experiment with pro- tectors of larger dimensions, still without any satisfactory re- sult; and I have other experiments still in progress, in which the two metals bear a more equal proportion, but sufficient time has. not yet elapsed to form a correct opinion as to the result. Experiments with the two metals in contact in salt water, for the purpose of substituting iron sheathing for ships’ bottoms instead of copper, have also engaged my attention, and have been attended with various results. As far as these experiments have proceeded, I fear they are not likely to be productive of the great benefit I at first anticipated. Although no doubt can exist as to the zinc protecting the iron from oxidation, as the simple electrical action arising by the con- tact of the two metals in presence of the fluid will produce that effect, yet I have found in all instances that the cor- Mr. Grant on protecting Iron from the Action of Salt Water. 129 rosion of the zinc is very considerable: the following expe- riment will show to what extent: Two pieces of sheet iron fastened to a piece of wood, the one with nine zinc nails, the other with the same number of iron nails having pieces of zinc $ths of an inch in diameter under the head of each nail ; also a third piece of sheet iron fastened to the wood simply with iron nails: the board was then floated in the sea, and at the expiration of thirty days, I found that the heads of six of the nine zinc nails had completely disappeared, and the pieces of zinc corroded to such an extent that only a very small por- tion of zinc remained. The protected iron down to this period was free from oxidation, whereas the iron unprotected was perfectly oxidized. This experiment has been repeated several times with the same result, which clearly shows that although the zinc completely protected the iron, the zinc itself became corroded in exact proportion to the protection that it afforded to the iron. Experiment has also proved that the same evil which rendered Sir Humphry Davy’s system of no practical use for the protection of copper on ships’ bottoms from oxidation, is also apparent to a certain extent as regards the protected iron ; viz. that by rendering it slightly negative, a calcareous substance is found deposited on its surface; and that sea ve- getable matter appeared also in a short period to attach itself to the iron, although in a much less degree than in the expe- riments tried on the bottoms of boats which were subject to the constant friction of the water passing by them. In the experiments tried in still water, vegetable matter was found to make its appearance on the iron in six weeks after immersion, although a strong electrical current was kept up during that period. The results of the experiments, as far as they have proceeded, lead me, therefore, to the fol- lowing conclusions: in the first place, that iron and zinc in connexion will not protect the former from oxidation in fresh water; secondly, that when iron and zinc are in connexion in salt water, the iron will be protected, but a calcareous and vegetable matter is generated upon it; and, thirdly, that in the same proportion as the zinc protects the iron, the zinc it- self becomes subject to corrosion. I wish it, however, to be clearly understood, that although these experiments are not so favourable as might be wished, I by no means consider them so conclusive as to preclude the necessity of further investigation. I am, Gentlemen, yours, &c. Royal Clarence Yard, Gosport, Tuomas TassELL Grant. November 22, 1835. car awit [ 430 Ji a XXV. On the Conducting Power of Iodine, Bromine, and Chlorine for Electricity. By Epwarp Souty, Jun., Esq.* QW the Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science; No. 42, p. 441, Dr. Inglis, in his prize essay on iodine, states that he has found solid iodine to be a conductor of elec- tricity. In my own observations I had always found it a non- conductor ; I was therefore led to repeat my experiments with greater care, and the following are the results. 1. I first sought for conducting power by the beautiful me- thod proposed by Dr. Wollaston, namely, the effect produced upon the tongue when two metals of different degrees of oxi- dibility, placed on either side of it, are made to communicate with each other, through any portion of conducting matter. lodine was melted in a thin glass tube, which, when cold, was broken, and the iodine obtained in a solid state ; a portion was then placed between the extremities of the two metals; but on no occasion was the least taste produced ; though if the metals were connected together only by being immersed in spring water, a taste was immediately perceived. When the two terminations of the metal plates are made to dip into 2 solution of iodine in water, a strong taste is perceived. 2. In order to examine the conducting power with the vol- taic battery, and where the application of the tongue would have been uncertain and inconvenient, the following apparatus was used. BD J K is a slip of glass, on which two pieces of bibulous paper, E and F, soaked in a solution of iodide of potassium, are placed. The wire A, resting upon E, was al- ways made the anode C; or that resting an F, the cathode: thus arranged, of course no action. took place. But if a wire was made to touch with one end the paper F, and with the other end the paper E, the usual series of pheenomena took place ; iodine was evolved at A, and also at that end of the tem- porary wire which rested upon F. The fluid to be examined was placed in a glass tube, G, having two platinum wires, H and I, fused into it; they were separated from each other by an interval of about the jth of an inch; thus, when the two wires were made to rest upon the two pieces of paper F and * Communicated by the Author.—It appears that we were correct in thinking that Dr. Inglis’s experiments on this subject would attract atten- tion. He has favoured us with the following reply to our note respecting it appended to the first part of his paper, as referred to above. “In answer to the note regarding the conducting power of iodine, I may just quote a sentence from my original Essay: ‘The preparation sent in, shows the state in which iodine requires to be, for the transmission of Electricity. It has merely been fused in a glass tube, and the tube afterwards broken from around it. But although it still continues to conduct, it did so with far more energy when in the fluid state.’ Dec. 18, 1835.”—Enrr. On the Conducting Power of Iodine, &¢. for Electricity. 131 ¥, any current that passed would be rendered evident by the decomposition of the iodide of potassium. » $. Iodine was fused in the tube G, and the end of its two wires, I and H, were placed on the papers E and_F, as soon as the iodine was solid; not the least spot of iodine was per- ceived at E or H, though the battery employed consisted of sixty pairs of plates, four inches square, in very strong action: a small piece of wire was then made to connect I and H, just where they are fused into the glass tube; and though they were but momentarily connected, yet a dark spot of iodine was pro- duced ; thus proving that the only interruption to the current was that in the tube G, between the wires H and I. Fig. 1. D . EK 4. ‘The iodine was then replaced by a solution of iodine in water; the current passed immediately, and produced its full effect at A and H: the water only, however, was decomposed, and no peculiar action was occasioned. But this is certainly no proof that iodine is at all a conductor ; we very well know that sulphuric acid added to water improves its conducting power, and so do phosphoric and sulphurous* acids, and man other acknowledged nonconductors; indeed, were it not for the addition of certain nonconducting substances, such as sul- phuric acid, the decomposition of water would hardly be ef- fected by the voltaic battery. Again, M. De la Rivet has remarked that bromine and chlorine are nonconductors, and ' * See Phil. Trans. 1834; Faraday’s Seventh Series, No. 755. for Lond. and Edinb. Phil. Mag., vol. v. p. 257.—Enrr.) « t Annales de Chimie et de Physique, 1827, vol. xxxv. 132 Mr. E. Solly on the Conducting Power of that pure water is also one; but that a solution of bromine or chlorine in water is a good conductor. A solution of iodine in zther also allowed the transmission of electricity, but in a less degree. 5. Iodine is soluble in carburet of sulphur, forming a fine pinkish red solution; when boiled in it, a considerable quan- tity is dissolved, which, upon cooling, is again deposited in crystals: neither the hot nor the cold solution conducted the electricity. 6. Iodine is also soluble in chloride of sulphur, forming a deep red liquid; much more is taken up by boiling, and upon cooling, crystals, probably of unaltered iodine, are precipitated. Dr. Inglis says that “iodine and chloride of sulphur form a compound, having many of the properties of bromine; but that it is decomposed by galvanism, which the real bromine is not.” The result of my experiments was different, for I found that when the red liquid was submitted to the electric current in G, it formed a perfect barrier to the passage of the elec- tricity, and it is very certain that decomposition cannot be effected without conduction. Perhaps Dr. Inglis will state how the experiment was performed, and at which electrode the jodine was evolved, or what were the substances evolved. 7. Bromine I found to be a nonconductor when placed in the tube G; a solution of bromine in water was a much better conductor than pure water, as M. De la Rive has mentioned (see the above-quoted memoir). In these and all the follow- ing experiments here described, the test of the wire (3.) was applied. s. A solution of bromine in ether conducts. AXther seems to have a remarkable action on the colours of solutions con- taining bromine, for whenever it is added to any of the deep red solutions containing bromine, or the iodide of bromine, the colour is rendered considerably lighter, so that an almost opake solution becomes pale yellow, and quite transparent. 9. Bromine is soluble in chloride of sulphur, in the same way as iodine, forming a beautiful red solution: this proved a nonconductor; but upon adding a few drops of zther it be- came aconductor. Bromine is also soluble in carburet of sulphur, forming a splendid red solution, similar to the fore- mentioned one: this was likewise a nonconductor; but a few drops of zether rendered it a conductor. 10. Periodide of bromine was a conductor; the current transmitted by it was fully able to decompose the iodide of po- tassium at E and F; but thedecomposition of water, also placed in the circuit, was effected with some difficulty. A little water was now added to the periodide of bromine; the water floated at the top, and dissolved a small portion of it: the water and the Bromine, Iodine, and Chlorine for Electricity. 133 iodide of potassium indicated that the current was passing; but the liquids in the tube G were not visibly affected. 11. An aqueous solution of the periodide of bromine being put into the tube G, conducted, and was briskly decomposed ; but both the platinum wires remained bright and clean, and neither iodine, bromine, nor any compound of them, was evolved or deposited on either electrode, though the action was continued for some time. 12. A solution of the periodide of bromine was a good con- ductor, and the current transmitted had sufficient intensity for the electrolyzation of water. Solutions of the periodide, in chloride of sulphur and carburet of sulphur, were nonconduc- tors; upon the addition, however, of a few drops of zther, they became good conductors. 13. The conducting power of chlorine was next tried, and for this purpose the following apparatus was employed: A BC, Fig. 2. fig. 2, is a glass tube ;*,ths of an inch in diameter, having two platinum wires fused into it at A, so as to be separated the 1,th of an inch from each other ; the tube being then inverted, the space from E to F was filled with peroxide of manganese and muriatic acid; the end C was then carefully closed by a spirit lamp, and the whole being cooled, it was placed in the posi- tion represented in the figure, the space from E to C being filled with a mixture for generating the chlorine, the other parts of the tube having been carefully kept dry. Heat was then applied to C, and B was immersed in ice-cold water; as soon as a sufficient quantity of liquid had collected in B, A was immersed in a mixture of ice and salt, and B was gently warmed ; by this means the liquid chlorine was rectified, and obtained quite free from water or other extraneous fluids at A. Matters being thus arranged, and sufficient chlorine having been condensed, the tube was placed in the same position as the tube G in the former figure, one of the two platinum wires resting on the moistened paper F, the other upon E, fig. 1. I was at first surprised by finding it a conductor; but when the tube was carefully wiped, so as to be quite free from all adhering salt from the freezing mixture, it proved a perfect nonconductor. 134 Mr. Sturgeon’s Description of the 14. The crystallized hydrate of chlorine was then put in the tube G, fig. 1: it proved a nonconductor. A strong solution of chlorine, placed in the same situation, was a good conductor. From these experiments the following conclusions may be drawn: Ist, that iodine, bromine, and chlorine are noncon- ductors; 2ndly, that they improve the conducting power of badly-conducting eiectrolytes; and 3rdly, that two noncon- ductors combining can form a body which can conduct electri- city, and which resists the decomposing power of the voltaic battery. 7, Curzon Street, 15th January, 1836. XXVI. Description of the Aurora Borealis of November 16, 1835. By W.Sturceon, Lecturer on Experimental Philosophy at the Honourable East India Company's Military Academy, &c. &c.* N aurora borealis of a very unusual character was seen in this neighbourhood, and I imagine over a large tract of country, on Wednesday evening the 16th instant. I was walking from Greenwich to Woolwich between nine and ten o’clock; and when I had arrived at the top of Maize Hill, by the side of Greenwich Park, then about ten minutes past nine, my attention was first attracted by the fine light of the aurora in the north. I walked on a little further till a good opening to the northern horizon presented itself from the road leading from Maize Hill to Mr. Angerstein’s estate. At this opening I made a determined stand, for the purpose of observ- ing any novel phznomenon which the aurora might happen to present. At this time it consisted principally of a very extensive la- teral range, on both sides of the pole star, of vertical streamers, which were pencilling thenorthern heavens from about 15° above the horizon to Cassiopeia’s Chair, then about the meri- dian; and so uniform was their arrangement and splendour that they presented one sheet of yellowish white light, the most intense at the base, and becoming more and more faint as they proceeded upwards, until quite lost at their terminal altitudes. This appearance of the aurora had but just stamped its im- pression on my mind, when in one moment the whole of the northern heavens appeared in one complete state of undulat- ing commotion, heaving upwards in rapid succession immense waves of lightt, which, like the streamers which preceded * Communicated by the Author. + These waves were seen at Milton next Gravesend by my scientific friend Mr. Swinny ; and I beg to acknowledge the obligation I am placed ‘Aurora Borealis of November 16, 1835. 135 them, gradually diminished in brilliancy from their source near the horizon till their arrival at the zenith, which was their ge- neral vanishing point. ; ‘The horizontal range of the aurora during this unusual dis- play was eastward as far as Jupiter, whose azimuth from the north was then about 75°; and perhaps about the same ex- tent westward on the other side of the pole star. 1 observed it stretch to beyond @ Lyre (Vega), whose azimuth from the north was about 60°, but could not very well ascertain the position of the western extremity at the place where I was standing, on account of the reflexion of the gas light in Lon- don mixing with that of the aurora, and the intervention of trees, &c. This extensive ocean of light, which illuminated nearly half of the visible heavens, and whose waves rolled with the rapidity of thought, lasted about eight or ten minutes, perhaps longer, when they gradually began to disappear, and the aurora to contract in all its dimensions. Until this time (nearly half past nine) no dense nucleus had marked the centre of the aurora: the stars were seen between the horizon and the lu- minous base as decidedly, though not so clear, as if no au- rora were present. ‘The star Benetnasch, in the tip of the tail of the Great Bear (y Ursae Majoris), was one of those which were observed below the aurora; but Mizar (g Ursze Majoris), then on the meridian below the pole, was seen in the bright arched base of the streamers and waves. The last-mentioned change in the appearance of the aurora brougbt it gradually to that state which is usually exhibited in some period or another of this boreal phenomenon. The dense black nucleus began to form, and soon curtained the stars which had previously twinkled in that segment of the northern sky. The luminous margin also, its usual attendant, became well defined, and its highest point was well marked to the westward of the meridian, perhaps nearly in the magnetic north. I now walked on, keeping the aurora in view, which shot occasional streamers from various parts of the luminous arch. Just before I entered Woolwich, about ten o’clock, another fine display of vertical streamers spread over the northern sky, and continued for nearly a quarter of an hour. By this time I reached home; but too late to ascertain their effect, if any, upon the magnetic needle, for they faded away very rapidly after my arrival, and before eleven the aurora had entirely disappeared. under to Mrs. Swiony, who also saw these waves, for a more happy de- scription of them than any I had before thought of. ‘They appeared to this lady as “ waves of thin smoke or steam, behind which was placed a strong light.” A more expressive description could not possibly be given. 136 Mr. J. Taylor on Rotatory Steam Engines. ! During my walk home, I observed several fine meteoric stars, most of which appeared to be shot from the same point of the heavens, which point was somewhere in a right line be- tween me and the Twins. One of these meteors shot with a moderate velocity across the north part of the meridian, at an altitude of about 80°, and appeared to traverse an arch of the heavens of 90° or 100°. It burst into several luminous frag- ments at the western termination of its range, and became extinct in a moment. I listened for some time, but heard no noise; neither did my servant who was with me, and who listened attentively at my request. I had previously point- ed out to him the direction he was to look in, and he saw the meteor from the first to its last appearance. He also di- rectly afterwards saw another from the same quarter, which traversed the heavens in nearly the same direction as the for- mer. He called out to me, but it was lost without my seeing +t. ‘These meteors were seen about five minutes before the last display of streamers mentioned above. I saw no appearance of the aurora to the south of the zenith, though frequently looked for. The sky was quite clear of clouds, and the black southern expanse, studded with its bril- liant stars, afforded a fine contrast to the display of the aurora in the north. Artillery Place, Woolwich, Nov. 19, 1835. N.B. Whilst writing the above, a friend has called on me, who saw fine streamers about half-past eight o’clock. De Ea XXVIL. On the History of Rotatory Single Steam Engines working expansively, in reply to Mr. Henwood. By John Taylor, Esq. ERS., Treas. G.S. To the Editors of the Philosophical Magazine and Journal. GENTLEMEN, Me: HENWOOD by his letter in your last Number (p. 20.) seems to exhibit a great desire for controversy, In as much as he attacks me because my communication appears to him to imply that a rotatory single engine working expansively is something of novelty. Now, not to insist upon the thing be- ing little known, it must be evident that it was no part of my object to discuss whether the engine which I described was new or otherwise, and that, in fact, I stated that it was not a new invention, and mentioned another on the same construc- tion formerly erected at Wheal Vor. I have since found that Captain Francis of the Mold mines has successfully applied the same principle to Whim engines; and I am glad to hear that those of Messrs. Gregor and Mr. J. Taylor on Rotatory Steam Engines. 137 Thomas seem further to prove that which I merely wished to draw the attention of engineers to, and by making it public in your pages, to give information which otherwise might not for a long time to come have reached to other districts. Having observed a certain instance of great improvement in the ceconomy of fuel, applicable to that kind of engine which is mostly employed in all the varied operations of our numer- ous manufactures, I merely desired to communicate the know- ledge of the fact; and, as I expressed in my letter, I pointed it out as deserving attention and inquiry. I think it much more important to the public to consider the steps by which improvements are worked out to practical advantage than to indulge in disputes about such originators of an invention as did little more than to broach an idea, good enough, perhaps, in itself, but which may only have been rendered valuable by the superior skill or industry of others exerted in bringing it into useful and general application. This observation may apply to what Mr. Henwood chooses to say of Mr. Woolf, respecting whom he seems to lose no opportunity of endeavouring to detract from the merit to which I and many others think he is entitled; my expression was that we owe to him the method of working high-pressure steam expansively *, and this is still my opinion. I have in another place recorded Captain Trevithick’s engine at Wheal Prosper, and so far have done him justice, but this engine did only about 26 millions duty, and did not equal other en- gines then working in the common way; nor does it appear that Captain Trevithick followed up his invention or produced any improvement upon the duty of the engines in Cornwall, the average not having increased until two years afterwards, when some of Mr. Woolf’s engines had attained to a duty of 50 millions, and Messrs. Jeffrey and Gribble had successfully adapted the same principle to an engine with one cylinder. Mr. Henwood in a note states correctly that Captain Lean reports the duty of the Charles Town engine at 40 millions, and not at 60, as stated by me. What, however, I did state was, that when [I saw it, soon after it was put to work, it was calculated to be performing a duty of about 60 millions. This calculation was made by the principal agent of the mine, and the engineer on the spot, and I saw no reason to doubt their accuracy, and gave their account as I received it, adding, how-. ever, that I had desired that its performance should be re- gularly reported in the monthly duty papers, by which of course any error in this respect would certainly be set right ; {* Our much respected predecessor, Dr, Tilloch, expended a consider- able part of his property in his zeal for assisting Mr. Woolf.—Ebrr.} Third Series. Vol. 8. No. 45. Feb. 1836. Q 188 Mr. Woodward’s Reply to Mr. Charlesworth. and observing that, if the rate of duty which I had mentioned could be maintained, a very great improvement might take place in the engines most generally employed. I still think that this is a very important object for the con- sideration of persons who employ or construct steam engines ; and if Mr. Henwood’s notice of my short letter should assist in interesting them in the subject, it will not be without its use, though I may not be inclined to trouble you again upon the disputed points. I am, Gentlemen, yours very truly, Bedford Row, Jan, 26, 1836. Joun Taytor. XXVIII. Cn the Crag Formation; in answer to Mr. Charles- worth’s “ Reply.” By Samuet Woopwarp, Esq. To the Editors of the Philosophical Magazine and Journal. GENTLEMEN, HE severe animadversions by Mr. Charlesworth, in your Number for December 1835, on my notice of his former paper, necessitates my requesting the favour of your inserting a few lines in reply. Mr.Charlesworth’s remarks about “breach of decorum” and ‘*impugning his veracity,” &c. &c. [ leave to the good sense of your readers; neither do I intend to quarrel about words. The difference between my opponent and myself appears to be this: He makes his “ red crag” a distinct formation, newer than the one upon which it reposes. I, on the contrary, have asserted it to be diluvial or disrupted crag, and cited as ex- amples the cliffs north and south of Yarmouth and at Cromer. Mr. R. C. Taylor, at p. 21 of his Geology of Eastern Norfolk, states, that “‘ the crag itself has, at the last of the geological epochs, been subject to abrasion by the diluvial currents to which allusion has been made. Their fragments, mingled with those of the chalk and preceding formations, piled in enormous heaps, form the cliffs of Cromer and Trimmingham, Z50 or 300 feet in thickness, upon the original crag, which rests, 22 situ, at their base.” And, strange to say, at p. 86, Mr. Charlesworth, forgetting his discovery that “ the red crag was a gradual deposit formed by successive accumulations of marine exuvie,” quotes my friend Mr. Searles Wood as fol- lows: ‘ Jam inclined to think the whole of the upper stratum has been produced from the ruin of the lower.” After such a contradiction of himself I might surely with greater pro- priety retort upon him the passage occurring at p. 466, |. 27. My impression on the first glance at the upper bed at Ramsholt was, (comparing it with the Norfolk deposit,) that, from its discoloration by the oxide of iron and there being no — Reviews, and Notices respecting New Books. 139 superincumbent bed except vegetable mould, it must belong to the diluvium ; and on examination I could find no perfect shells; all appeared to me to be waterworn and broken into fragments, and to have been transported from some other deposit. I have shown Mr. Charlesworth the note I made at the time on the lower bed, which is as follows: ** From the or- ganic remains resembling those of Malta, figured by Scilla, in his Corporibus Marinis, &c., 1 am inclined to think the sheils of this bed much newer than those reposing on them.” This opinion has unexpectedly been confirmed (contrary to Mr. Charlesworth’s conjecture at p. 92,) by the latest infor- mation from M. Deshayes, communicated to Mr. Lyell; by which it appears that a larger percentage of recent species has been detected in the so-called “coralline crag” than from perhaps any other portion of the great deposit. If such is the fact, and I have no reason to doubt my authority, there is an end of the question between my opponent and myself. The propriety or impropriety of calling the lower bed “coralline crag” is, I conceive, of little moment, and a mere question of words, and not of facts. What I contended for was, that it was not composed of corallines [corals] as that at Aldborough; and my opinion still is, that the use of the term, as distinguishing the epoch of any portion of the crag, tends only to mislead the inquirer. Iam, Gentlemen, yours, &c. Lakenham Grove Cottage, SamMuEL Woopwarp. Norwich, Dec. 4, 1835. XXXI. Reviews, and Notices respecting New Books. Newton and Flamsteed, Remarks on an Article in Number CIX. of the Quarterly Review: by the Rev. Witt1AM WueEweE Lt, M.A., Fellow and Tutor of Trinity College, Cambridge. Deighton, Cambridge; and Parker, Strand. HE attention of the public has been lately directed with anxious interest to the character of Sir Isaac Newton, by an article in the Quarterly Review, founded upon Mr. Baily’s Account of Flam- steed, prefixed to an edition of his Observations, printed by the Board of Admiralty ; and copious extracts from this ‘ Account’ have been given by some of our contemporaries. The work itself not being published, but privately distributed, we have had no opportunity of judging for ourselves as to the value of the conclusions drawn from the letters of Flamsteed, and the grounds which they afford the Reviewer for announcing to the world, though with professions of regret, that the name of Newton is nolonger to he hadinreverence. From the appearance, however, of Mr. Whewell’s short pamphlet entitled ‘Newton and Flamsteed,’ we have now the satisfaction of finding that the subject has been fully investigated Qe 140 Reviews, and Notices respecting New Books. by one who will be universally considered as most competent to form a correct judgement :—and to very many who have beendwell- ing with grief and wonder upon the painful impressions created by this Review of an unpublished book, the following decisive expres- sion of Mr. Whewell’s opinion will be very grateful : ‘I shall conclude; leaving it to the reader to decide—whether the blame of intemperate virulence of feeling and irrational violence of conduct does not rest solely with Flamsteed ;—whether Newton’s philosophical and moral character do not come out from this exa- mination BLAMELESS and ADMIRABLE, as they have always been esteemed by thinking men;—and whether the Reviewer has not shown extraordinary ignorance of that part of scientific history which he has pretended to elucidate, and unaccountable blindness and perverseness in his use even of the ex parte evidence which he had before him.” Mr. Whewell’s pamphlet evinces the clear-sightedness and candour for which he is distinguished, Though a very short, itis a very ad- mirable and interesting production, and entitles its author to rank as high for moral discrimination, as he does for scientific attain- ments. We shall take the liberty to quote rather largely, knowing the interest which must be taken in the subject. With regard to the Reviewer's unaccountable blindness, perverseness, and partiality, he justly remarks, that “‘ he has taken for his sole guide the state. ments of one of the parties, written in the warmth of the moment, —has identified himself with Flamsteed’s most petulant feelings, and has not corrected them by any attention to the case of the opposite party. Whenthe great body of Review Readers are called upon, in this temper, to cast away all their reverence * for the most revered name of our nation, it must be right that some one should interpose a warning, and deprecate judgments of such levity and partiality.” “It is to be observed,” adds Mr. Whewell, “ that if we adopt the Reviewer's opinion, that Flamsteed was throughout a man bitterly wronged, and that there was an extreme of baseness and tyranny on the side of the persons with whom he quarrelled, we involve in our condemnation almost all the eminent literary and scientific men of the day +: for we have, acting with Newton, and sharing in his views, not only Halley, the object of Flamsteed’s intense dislike, but Gregory, Arbuthnot, Mead, Sloane, Wren. « The purpose for which Newton desired that the world should pessess the best observations, was the confirmation of the great Theory of Universal Gravitation ;—incomparably the greatest dis- covery ever made by man; and at that period, we may say, in the agony of that latent struggle by which the confirmation and general reception of great discoveries is always accompanied. We of the present day are accustomed to consider this immense step as effected at once, on the publication of the first edition of the Principia in 1687 ; but we may easily convince ourselves that this was not so. Even under the most favourable circumstances, a vast theory like * The Edinburgh Review intimates that this reverence has been all a mistake, attributable to one Mr. Conduit! + Designated by the Edinburgh Reviewer as ‘ Newton's party”: vide infra, p. 144. “ Newton and Flamsteed,”’ by the Rev. W. Whewell. 141 this could not make its way at once. No man of Newton’s standing (I believe) thoroughly accepted his views: Halley was sixteen, David Gregory nineteen years his junior. In England this acceptance of the theory required half a generation, in France and Germany more than a whole generation. And during this interval, the re- sult of the struggle depended upon the accordance of the theory with the best observations, which the Greenwich ones undoubtedly were. Upon these observations, then, depended a greater stake in the fortune of science than was ever before at hazard, and this New- ton knew well. How then can one be surprised at the earnestness and importunity with which he begs for Flamsteed’s observations ; and tries to soothe a jealousy and reserve which appear to have shown themselves at an early period? “As for your observations, you know I cannot communicate them to any body, and much less publish them, without your consent. But if 1 should perfect the moon’s theory, and you should think fit to give me leave to publish your observations with it, you may rest assured that I should make a faithful and honourable acknowledgment of their author, with a just cha- racter of their exactness above any others yet extant. Inthe former edition of my book, you may remember that you communicated some things to me, and I hope the acknowledgments I made of your communications were to your satisfaction: and you may be assured I shall not be less just to you for the future. For all the world knows that I make no observations myself, and therefore I must of necessity acknowledge their author: and if I do not make a handsome acknowledgment, they will reckon me an ungrateful clown.— Account of Flamsteed, p. 151. «« This the Reviewer has quoted ; but he has not quoted what immediately follows, striking as it is. “And, for my part, I am of opinion that for your observations to come abroad thus with a theory which you ushered into the world, and which by their means has been made exact, would be much more * for their advantage and your reputation, than to keep them private til] you die or publish them, without such a theory to recommend them. For such theory will be a de- monstration of their exactness, and make you readily acknowledged the ex- actest observer that has hitherto appeared in the world. But if you publish them without such a theory to recommend them, they will only be thrown into the heap of the observations of former astronomers, till somebody shall arise that, by perfecting the theory of the moon, shall discover your obser- vations to be exacter than the rest. But when that shall be, God knows: I fear, not in your life-time, if I should die before it is done. For I find this theory so very intricate, and the theory of gravity so necessary to it, that I am satisfied it will never be perfected but by SomzBopy WHO UNDERSTANDS THE THEORY OF GRAVITY AS WELL OR BETTER THAN I po,—p. 151-152. “ js Bef i ') (1.) we shall have 1 H 2 1 H,? 6,2 2 H,2 4 Sg ey eg Ea fh a ae i? O4—, &e. (2.) 2 But if we use the exact formula, 1 k > (sin 6y* ihn s{ (=) \ (3.) . - A and substitute for @ its value a we shall in like manner have, 1 2 Diamine Z 2 4 p= S(H)- Z (5) Sad) +e () Scag) =), Occ. (4.) ue On the Formula for the Dispersion of Light. 205 Now, to compare this with the approximate development (2.) we may assume H, = vS(H?) _ 7, /S (He!) eee. vie which being substituted in (2.) will give ry w/e ope era 2/2" \*[S.(H?Ae*) |? a= 8(H)— 3(5) SHA) + GIS) “song == 18 &e. (6.) Hence it is manifest that by our assumption of H, and @, in the approximate formula, the two first terms of both deve- lopments are identical; but the third and subsequent terms will differ. We thus obtain an idea of the degree in which the approximation deviates from the truth, In the next place, adopting the exact development (4.) we may proceed to the important discussion of a method of de- termining the coefficients, and of actually computing the value of »% in any given case. The development may be ex- pressed in the following form, writing single letters for the coefficients : 1 Fiih ee S gts == A,— Ai(=) + Ao(—] —, &e. (7.) Now, if r be the time of a vibration, or, what is the same thing, of the propagation of a wave, « being the reciprocal of the velocity, we shall have pt ay i eae Thus the series (7.) becomes ! oan we wy" ap = Ao Ai), +4 (2) BAe (8.) Again, we might substitute other letters for the coefficients by making them include the powers of » so as to express the 4, 1 : series in powers of tee only. By extracting the root, and developing the reciprocal of the polynomial, it will be easily seen that the series resulting will be still one of the same powers of (=), and may be expressed in this form, 9 = a + a, (=) + a, (on +, &c. (9.) 206 ~—— Prof. Powell’s Formula for Dispersion of Light Now, if we substitute this value of « in each term of the following expression derived from (8), viz. pe po O= —1+ Apwi— A, + Ag - &e. (10.) we shall have (=I + Ag [ao + a, t*? + &e.]? | + Av fiag +.a,77? +,&c.)*.077 \, , (11.) (VS | + Ag [ao +4, 77? + &e.]®°. r* e &c. If in this expression we collect the coefficients of the same powers of r and equate them respectively to zero, we shall at length obtain, = 4% = ve - a, =iA,A,? (12.) Cay A, Ae a A, hare We might continue the process: but confining ourselves to the three first terms, we find, Ist, that a) a, are positive; and a, may probably be so; Zndly, that, since the first coeffi- cients A, A,, &c. are all independent of u, and since we have values of the second set a a, in terms of these only, therefore these last are also zndependent of »%, that is, are constant for all rays in the same medium, but differ for different media. Thus in the series (9.) the value of » will differ only by the change in the factor 7, that is, for rays whose times of vibra- tion are different, or, in other words, for rays whose lengths of waves are different, that is, for the different primary rays. We shall thus obtain the means of calculating the value of » for each ray independently of the medium, supposing we may restrict ourselves to the three first terms. For we have the three constants a @, @. the same in the series for each ray ; thus if we take such serieses for any four rays we can eliminate the three constants. Let us then consider the four rays (in Fraunhofer’s nota- tion) B, D, F, H; for any one medium, we shall have this sy- stem of equations, viz. rt Q a5 bp = A + 4, TR + GTR” ) _ Hp = A + a tH + Me | (13.) sp 2 -2 ~4 bp = 4 + TR + Age | Py = % + TH + a, TH J derived from M. Cauchy’s Theory. 207 Between these it is possible to eliminate the three medium-con- stants a) a, @., and thus to deduce a general relation, valid for all media, between the four indices ph, Hp Hp My» and the four periodic times tz tp Tp Ty. Now, a little consideration will show that this relation can only involve the two ratios of the three differences of the four indices, and the two ratios of the three differences of the four reciprocals of the squares of the periodic times. Taking these we may for abridgement write, Py —& = PESOS BY Sag? VE RIEL Be Sp (14.) Profs Pu Ps ciate lage 7 Bt a i penile A (15.) Paeitg, May ar ig re Then it will appear that the result of elimination will be a relation between the four quantities s, sp tp tp only; and will not involve the four other quantities hp, My Ty Ty if we pre- viously substitute for #4 wp tp’ rp” their respective expres- sions deduced from (14.) and (15.), which are Hp = Pp +Sp Hu—Ps) I Hp = Hy + Sp (Hyp) oe? =\t9° + ty (a 75°) ; ta = ahs at (7H —T3°) (16.) (17) This result of elimination will therefore be the same as if in the equations (13.) we had supposed 4 to II ™~ D ie ts ie (18.) ae pe be. =. tp ols Oieatia =e Ola iG,| J that is, the same as if we eliminated any two new quantities b and c between the three new equations Sm = btp + ¢t,* : (19.) “a 7" Il ~ = = a ™~ Z08 Prof. Powell’s Formula for the Dispersion of Light This last elimination is easy, and gives as the relation sought the following : Ss 1—+t Ss 1-—t eee ¥ Be Ry ee gt or (20.) be so pute ih ei stead This relation may be expanded by substituting the values (14.) and (15.) so as to put it under the form, ( (+p ~Fs) (TH wuin e) (TR —T;) ae 0 = 2 —(up—Hp) (ta —*5°) (75°73) (FH — 75’) r fet) L4(@u—Fs) (tr’—TB°) tp’ — TB’) (te TD) J and in this way the relation (20.) may be verified, as it will then be found to be satisfied independently of the three me- dium-constants a) a, a, by the expression (13.) for the four indices. Now, to proceed to the actual calculation, we have Fraun- hofer’s values of A for the standard rays; these are obtained from interference, and are absolutely independent of any me- dium. Now if ¢' the time which light takes to traverse a given length J' zm vacuo, will obviously have t! hal EH Pie KE If then we take ¢’ as the unit of time, we have for the time of a vibration 7m vacuo Aa T= i ih Thus if 7’ = ,5455 inch, since by Fraunhofer’s observa- tions we have ~ = ‘00002451 inch, it follows that we have axis "BABL aa similarly tp = 2175 tp = "1794 ty = 4G. = (22) Now, there is a circumstance which may be remarked among these numbers, which affords a considerable facility in our calculation. The square of +, will be found to be almost exactly an harmonic mean between the square of the extreme values t, T,,: or we have te? = 2 (ty + 73) (23.) so that in the notation of 5.) yee (24.) derived from M. Cauchy’s Theory, 209 Availing ourselves of this circumstance we may put the re- lation (20.) or (21.) under the simpler form 4 Sptp(l1—-4p) —Sp = 4 (1-26) (25.) or, what is equivalent, My Pp = Up (up—Hg) + by (un—2 Hy +s) (26.) whence ay = — (1—2¢,) = —tp (1-2 ¢p) which are wholly functions of the values of +, viz. 4p — el 7 2 eo (27.) fi 1a. ta ~2tp +R" by nae eS ae e TA eal = ; (28.) Thus employing the values (22.) of T; Tp Ty the follow- ing numbers result : log (—ap) = 1:80441 log (—b,) = 1:06281 Now, to take an example of a particular medium; for flint glass, No. 13, Fraunhofer found bp = 16277 bp = 1'6483 My = 1°6711. Hence by (26.) and the above logarithms, we may calculate the value of »,, which will be found to result My = 163492; by Fraunhofer’s observation it was My = 1°6350. Such is the method of Sir W. R. Hamilton: he has, how- ever, not only calculated this example, but has gone through the values of the index, for the same ray D in all the media examined by Fraunhofer. These results I will subjoin, add- ing a column of the same values as computed by myself, by a tentative method with only the approximate formula, from my paper in the Philosophical Transactions. Third Series. Vol. 8. No. 46. March 1836. 2A 210 On the Formula for the Dispersion of Light. By My #, Medium, Calculated Calculated fedinm Observed by by theexact | by the approxi- Fraunhofer. Formula. mate Formula. ——— el — eee eee —EEEEEE——EES Flint-glass 13. 1°6350 1°63492 1°6355 Do. 93. 1°6337 1°63350 1°6335 Do. 30. 1°6306 1°63051 1°6305 Do. 3. 1:6085 1°60825 1°6079 Crown-glass M. 1°5591 1°55901 1°5593 Do. 13. 1°5281 1°52788 1°5279 Do. 9. 1°5296 1°52945 1°5296 Oil of turpentine.| 1°4'744 1°47444 | 1°4746 Solution of potash. 1°4028 1°40270 1°4029 Water. 1°3336 1°33346 1°3333 I shall not here enter on any detailed remarks or compari- sons of the results exhibited in this table. From it the reader will be enabled to form a correct judgement of the degree in which the approximate method is comparable with the exact ; at least for media of no higher dispersive power than those examined by Fraunhofer. Meanwhile we may just observe, that the results here given by the exact formula are invariably a little in defect compared with those of observation; whereas the approximate numbers are sometimes in defect and some- times in excess. To this circumstance, and some further investigations connected with it, I shall recur in a future communication. —<—<_—_—=— In the last Number (p. 113) 1 alluded to the calculations of M. Rudberg. It may be worth while to observe that such a formula as that which he adopted empirically, may give results nearly coinciding with those of the formula derived from theory which I have used, as will appear by the following con- siderations. M. Rudberg’s formula, in my notation, becomes ie = a ae), be 1 Now (writing @ gaan a'), let us suppose a quantity H! so assumed that we have or; atx = H'(1-=5); Rev. Mr. Whewell’s Reply to the Quarterly Review. 211 then (writing H! ¢’-> =H) we shall have Sagey 1, a1) a2. ] {=H [ 1 (m=1) tp ae. This may obviously coincide with approximate development 1 Black ae especially if we confine ourselves to the first two terms, 2, (which is usually sufficient,) making (m—1) = er XLI. Remarks on a Note on a Pamphlet entitled ** Newton and Flamsteed” in No. CX. of the Quarterly Review. By the Rev. W. Wuewewt, M.A. F.R.S., Fellow and Tutor of Trinity College, Cambridge.* To the Editor of the Quarterly Review. My dear Sir, Trinity College, Cambridge, Feb. 3, 1836. HAVE just seen No. 110 of the Review; and I perceive that the reviewer of Mr. Baily’s account of Flamsteed, in No. 109, has done my remarks on his article the honour of writing a note respecting them, which you have inserted. As I do not see in this note any new arguments on the re- viewer's side of our controversy, I do not conceive that I have occasion to add much to what I have already said, for I pre- sume your readers do not look for an answer to mere hard words, A few additional remarks will, I think, enable com- petent judges to decide between us. I asserted, and assert, that Flamsteed never fully compre- hended or accepted Newton’s theory ;—never understood the difference between the Newtonian theory of the causes of the celestial motions, and the empirical laws of phanomena which he himself called theories;—in short, the difference between a formula and an explanation—between the discovery of what occurred, and the discovery why it occurred—between an ob- server and a philosopher. I quoted a letter which proved this; nor does the reviewer venture to deny the clear inference which irresistibly follows from this quotation. But he takes refuge in “ the whole tenour of the correspondence,” without quoting a single passage. ‘To any one capable of understand- ing the distinction which I have pointed out, the whole tenour of the correspondence shows Flamsteed to have had no glimpse of this difference. For example, he says (Account of Flam- * From the 2nd edition of Mr. Whewell’s Pamphlet. See our last Num- ber, p. 139—147. 2A2 212 The Rev. Mr. Whewell’s Remarks on a Note steed, &c., p. 211,) of the theory, * Z call zt mine, because it consists of my solar and lunar tables corrected by myself, and shall own nothing of Mr. Newton’s labours till he fairly owns what he has had from the Observatory ;” and (p. 214) he says, that Newton “would needs question the observations when they agreed not with his theories, or rather conceptions.” The book is full of such expressions. The Edinburgh re- viewer, wiser than his brother, has pointed out this. When my opponent has produced any one passage which shows that Flamsteed understood the difference between the nature of his own labours and those of Newton, (which these passages and many others prove he did not understand,) we shall be able to appreciate his claims to use language like that which he has applied to my opinions. ‘Till then, such ex- pressions as ‘ audacious dictum,” and “we must beg our non- undergraduate public to consider,” must, I think, pass for bold words used to supply the lack of proofs. I repeat also, that Flamsteed’s complaining that the English nation was robbed, because Newton’s theory of comets was confirmed by French observations, is another proof that Flam- steed did not understand what the nature, interest, or value of a true theory was. With regard to the hard terms alleged by Flamsteed to have been used by Newton, I should, I think, have conveyed more exactly the impression which Flamsteed’s angry state- ment leaves on calm consideration, by saying that it is proba- ble that when Flamsteed had talked of the Royal Society as the robbers of his property, Newton did, in some way, em- ploy the term “puppy”; but that it is certain that this was the hardest word which he was provoked to use; for it is abundantly clear that if anything worse had been said, Flam- steed was not in a temper, or of a character, to abstain from recording it. ‘The reviewer’s argument amounts to this :— that an angry man cannot exaggerate or misrepresent, because a clergyman ought not to lie. I donot think this will avail him. On the subject of the sealed packet, I will put the issue in the form of a question. What does the reviewer take to have been the purpose of depositing the observations in Newton’s hands? My answer is simple. From Flamsteed’s known irritability, it was thought necessary to require this deposit, in order to secure the publication, in case Flamsteed should refuse to proceed. The case provided for arrived: the remedy was applied. I want to hear of any other interpretation of the deposit. The exclamatory way in which the reviewer disposes of the account given by Arbuthnot of this step, appears to me rather on * Newton and Flamsteed” zx the Quarterly Review. 213 tragical than logical. ‘The Queen’s command. What a paltry, pitiful subterfuge! The Queen’s command! How often is the name of royalty thus abused!” ‘The evidence that it had been abused in this case is, I believe, only Flamsteed’s opinion——** This I am persuaded was false” (p. 294)—which I hold to be altogether insufficient, even if he had been an uninterested and reasonable person. The note quotes a passage of my remarks, in which I had said that I left it to the reader to decide * whether the re- viewer had not shown an extraordinary ignorance of that part of scientific history,” &c. As I wrote with the wish of avoid- ing anything offensive, I have once or twice since been dis- posed to regret that I had not left this decision to the reader, without saying that I had done so. I feel much less of this regret after reading the reviewer’s acknowledgement respect- ing the preface to the first edition of the Observations, that ‘* he certainly is ignorant of this preface ;” and after his speak- ing of it as a want of candour to call it Halley’s, which no person at all acquainted with the history of astronomy needs to be informed. As to the statement made in this preface, I need not inform those who have read my Remarks, that I did not put it forward as unquestionable authority, but as the case on one side, in opposition to the ex-parte statement made by the reviewer on the other. ‘There is, however, this material difference ;—that this statement of Halley’s was published to the world, and challenged contradiction ; that adopted by the reviewer is found in the moody soliloquies and querulous effu- sions of a weak man, which did not see the light till a hundred and thirty years later. As to Tlamsteed’s charges against Halley’s edition, I can hardly suppose that the reviewer will carry any unprejudiced reader with him when he adopts them; though this proceeding is certainly in the general spirit of his treatment of the subject. I did not argue the question of right in my Remarks; but I must now say that I am very far from assenting to the state- ments on this subject which have been published. The ques- tion of the kind of constraint which the nation has a right to exercise over the publication of the astronomer royal’s Obser- vations, I conceive to be avery difficult one: but Halley’s statement that the Observatory had existed for thirty years and that nothing had been published, is a strong primd facie case; for it would be absurd to suppose that the Observer was at liberty to lock up his observations for ever. What would be the use of such an Observatory? or the meaning of its having visitors? I must observe here that the reviewer has, very unwarrantably, transformed the statement that nothing 214 ‘The Rev. Mr. Whewell’s Remarks on a Note was published, into a charge that nothing was done. The complaint was, that though much was done, nobody but the observer could profit. by it. I do not think it a reasonable infliction either on the reader or the writer, that a discussion of the character of one man should ramify into controversies on the merits of several others; and therefore I shall say as little as possible respecting Hal- ley and Whiston. Halley, an eminent and vigorous philoso- pher, who devoted himself to science in the most liberal and useful manner during a long life, I hope to see vindicated, by some one acquainted with the history of those times, from the aspersions which the childish spleen and gall of an irritated rival threw upon him, and which have been so strangely and precipitately adopted by men of the present day. I lament his or any one’s errors; but when the reviewer reminds us of the exclusion of Halley from the Savilian professorship on the ground of his want of religion, we may, perhaps, allow ourselves to hope that his subsequent election to the office im- plies that such unhappy opinions had been discarded. The charges of ignorance and immoral conduct are utterly at va- riance with all we know of him; and rest on nothing but Flamsteed’s extravagant prejudices and passions servilely adopted by the reviewer. The friend of Newton, the favoured servant of King William, Queen Anne, Queen Caroline, to whom the offer was made of being appointed preceptor to the Duke of Cumberland, was never by any other person accused of want of respectability: and the man whom Lalande termed the greatest of English astronomers, and whom the severe- judging Delambre calls one of the most eminent men of sci- ence that Europe has produced, can suffer little from Flam- steed’s disparagement of his knowledge. I hold Whiston’s testimony to be of small value (not that he himself was a worthless person, as the reviewer takes the liberty of misquoting me), from the extraordinary inconsistency, prejudice, and self-conceit, which I find in his memoirs of himself. That he had some mathematical knowledge is little to the purpose ; though, even in such subjects, I suppose the reviewer is not prepared to admire the judgement which led him to recommend the scheme of finding the longitude by having ships moored all over the surface of the ocean, each to fire a gun at midnight, so as to be heard and seen at any place. The reviewer states that Halley also kept his observations of the moon long unpublished, in order to have a chance of obtaining the reward for the longitude; and asks, ** What does Mr. Whewell think of private property now?” To which I answer, that I think of Halley’s property as I think of Flam- on * Newton and Flamsteed” in the Quarterly Review. 215 steed’s. Halley did publish, and with dispatch, his other ob- servations. I have never either defended or blamed his hold- ing back the lunar observations ; but I may observe that the crisis which gave the peculiar importance to the publication of Flamsteed’s was past; and I do not think Halley’s motive at all reprehensible. In all such cases it is difficult to decide what constraint may be applied so as to produce publication. There may be a fault of procrastination and fastidiousness, which was Flamsteed’s. The attempt to expedite publication in the manner which may be most advantageous to astronomy js meritorious; and this merit was Halley’s and Newton’s. Whether in pursuit of this object they went beyond the limits which it is so difficult to define, I do not pronounce; but I am sure that Flamsteed was no judge of those limits; and his evidence is so far damaged by his circumstances and charac- ter, that it hardly helps us in deciding the point. When you reviewers condescend to controversy, you have an overwhelming advantage in being advocate and judge at the same time. I presume it is in a momentary usurpation of the latter capacity that my opponent calls my pamphlet “rash,” “unworthy,” &c. And when, moreover, to the cir- culation and authority of the Quarterly, you add the rapid reply of a monthly periodical, as in the present case, a poor pamphleteer has no chance of being heard in opposition to you. I shall therefore take the vehicle nearest at hand for this letter, and send it to the Cambridge paper; by which means it may, I hope, come to the knowledge of several of those who care most about the question. Believe me, my dear Sir, yours very faithfully, W. WHEWELL. To the Editor of the Cambridge Chronicle. Sir, I shall be much obliged by your publishing this letter as a postscript to that addressed to the editor of the Quarterly Review, which you did me the favour of inserting in last week’s Chronicle. Some of my friends, feeling that strong interest in the fair fame of Newton, which those cannot fail to feel who love to contemplate the union of intellectual and, moral excellence, have expressed regret at my not having answered the charge that Newton neglected to acknowledge his obligation to Flam- steed for the observations by which the numerical elements of the lunar theory were determined; and that in the second edi- tion of the Principia he erased the acknowledgement he had 216 ~- The Rev. Mr. Whewell’s Remarks on a Note made in the first. I had passed over this point, as not bear- ing materially on the dispute respecting the publication of Flamsteed’s observations, which appears to have attracted the largest share of the notice of the public; and with a view of abridging, as much as justice would permit, this unprofitable discussion of the errors and weaknesses of those whom we have been accustomed to admire: but a few words on the subject just mentioned may serve to show how much of mistake there is in such statements. That the Newtonian lunar theory was published the second time without any acknowledgement of what it owed to Flam- steed, is not true. Newton’s “Theory of the Moon,” on its first appearance after the use of Flamsteed’s observations, and on the only occasion (so far as I know) when it was published with that title, was inserted in David Gregory’s Astronomia Physice et Geometrice Elementa, printed in 1702. It is there stated (p. 332) that the illustrious author had made the calcu- lations agree very nearly with the phznomena, “ as he had proved by very many places of the moon observed by the ce- lebrated Mr. Flamsteed.” And the elements of the theory are there by Newton referred to Greenwich. With this book, Flamsteed was on various accounts much discontented. One great reason was, that Gregory had said, “ ‘The most solid walls, and even rocks and mountains, are not absolutely steady ;” ‘ This,” says Flamsteed, “is a‘fling at my wall-arc.” (Flamsteed, p. 204.) But I do not see that he here complains. of any omission of his name in the Lunar Theory. Newton had previously communicated his theory to Flamsteed, in the shape in which the observer could understand and use it (Flamsteed, p. 72); and though Flamsteed speaks contemp- tuously and disparagingly of it, he employed it in constructing lunar tables, which he called a Theory. It is of this that he says, a little before the publication of Gregory’s work, (p. 211,) ‘‘ T call it mine, and shall own nothing of Mr. Newton’s la- bours, till he fairly owns what he has had from the Observa- tory.” ‘The obligations of the theory of universal gravitation to Flamsteed, were of the same nature as its obligations to Tycho Brahe, who believed that the sun went round the earth. The observations were highly useful; but it would have been an absurd perversion of the truth to have called the observer one of the authors of the theory. Yet it is probable that no- thing less than this, and probably not this, would have satis- fied the discontented and morbid mind of Flamsteed. "What was stated in Gregory’s book was just; and I do not see what more could have been briefly said. By the time of the publication of the second edition of the on * Newton and Flamsteed” in the Quarterly Review. 217 Principia in 1713, (the year before the sacrifice to Heavenly Truth), the impossibility of noticing Flamsteed in any man- ner which would not disgust and irritate him, must have been very clear. Newton appears therefore only to have acted with common prudence and forbearance in avoiding such notice as much as possible. Flamsteed is not quoted as authority for the Lunar Theory, of which he rejected a great part. (See Account of Flamsteed, pp. 304, 305, 309.) His observations of the comet are quoted as the best. In several other points, as the observations of the satellites of Jupiter, Newton refers to published observations of other astronomers, instead of the private communications of Flamsteed. It was proper to rea- son upon published rather than upon unpublished observa- tions; and the terms on which Flamsteed had put himself with Newton were probably felt by the great philosopher to be such as rendered it undesirable to make use of the private letters of his perverse correspondent. So far as the published letters of Flamsteed prove anything, they show, that not only he did not feel himself injured by not being mentioned in those parts of the second edition of the Principia which refer to the moon, but that he entertained such an opinion of the work as would have made him angry at being so introduced. Thus, soon after the publication, he says, (p. 305,) ** I think his new Principia worse than the old.” And (p. 309) he writes to his friend Abraham Sharp, «JT have determined to lay these crotchets of Sir Isaac New- ton wholly aside; and I think if you purchase not the new edition of his book [of which the price was 18s.] you will be at least 17s. a saver by it; for I know not whether all the alterations and additions be worth 12d.” So much for the wrong done to Flamsteed by not being sufficiently mentioned in the second edition of the Principia. I have been told also that I ought to have noticed more par- ticularly some of the extravagant expressions of assumed au- thority and intemperate accusation which occur in the note in the Quarterly Review: but as these can affect only the character of the anonymous reviewer, I do not see how it can be worth while to make them the subject of remark. I will again leave it to the reader to decide, after looking at the passages I have just produced, whether the writer of the note, in appealing to “the whole tenour of the book,” as proving that Flamsteed comprehended and accepted Newton’s Theory, was not asserting at random, and taking the chance of the impression he might produce, without having read the work which was under his review, or understanding the ques- tion on which he undertook to pronounce. 218 Prof. Rigaud on a Note in the I suppose that if the vilifier of Newton has nothing to sup- port him but rhetoric of this kind, the admirers of that great man will not feel any permanent inquietude ; and my sole ob- ject will be answered. I am, Sir, your very obedient servant, Trinity College, Feb. 6, 1836. _ W. WHEWELL. XLII. Observations on a Note respecting Mr. Whewell, which is appended to No. CX. of the Quarterly Review. ByS. P. Rieaup, Esq. M.A. F.R.S., Savilian Professor of Astronomy, Ozford. To the Editors of the Philosophical Magazine and Journal. SIRs, Oxford. Tue following remarks were, for the most part, drawn up before I saw the letters which Mr. Whewell has printed in the Cambridge Chronicle of the 6th and 13th of February*. Some parts of what had been written were found, in conse- quence, to be unnecessary ; but leaving these to his able de- fence, I am still induced to offer the remainder to your con- sideration. Irritation is so great an obstacle to the attainment of truth, that I deeply regret the tone which the writer has assumed. That, however, I leave to his better feelings; my business is with his facts and his arguments. S. P. Ricaup. PRE reader is most probably acquainted with the Note in question; it seems unnecessary, therefore, to occupy his time with introductory explanations of the parts which have been thought to require correction. ‘The topics, though ex- amined separately, are taken nearly in the order which the original suggested. Whiston was an honest and laborious man, but very defi- cient in judgement. As he advanced in life he became more pertinacious in error; he had sacrificed the world to his sin- cerity, and, conscious of moral rectitude in his purpose, he persuaded himself that he must be equally right in his opinions. Bishop Hare’s own character adds no weight to the senti- ments which he may express on this subject, but the few words which have been quoted from him are not contradictory to what is here said. Sir Isaac Newton, therefore, may be equally justified in his early patronage of his successor in the Lucasian Professorship, and in afterwards shunning his society. ‘This change Whiston was unwilling to consider as just; and in * See the preceding article of our present Number. Quarterly Review respecting Mr. Whewell. 219 speaking of the man whose friendship he had lost, he says in- deed what he thinks, but his thoughts, which at best were often inaccurate, were now warped by his feelings of disap- pointment. I have not the slightest wish to take in any way from what may be justly due to Flamsteed ; on the contrary, I honour his self-devotion to that department of science in which he was qualified so eminently and so usefully to excel; I honour his independence and noble application of his own property to his great (and it ought to have been national) object; I re- spect his religion, but I fear that I do not adopt so high a view of it as some of his undiscriminating admirers. I do not mean to express any doubts of his opinions on the great truths of Revelation, or of his general intention to conform his conduct to the dictates of Christianity; but his unhappy tem- per, irritated by disease, was suffered to become ungovern- able. ‘If any man seem to be religious and bridleth not his tongue, but deceiveth his own heart,” the apostle has told us the state to which he may be reduced. I presume to judge no one or to pronounce that “his religion is vain”; but, with every allowance for the weakness of human nature, I must say, that professions of forgiveness too frequently repeated, and constant assumption of the special favour of Heaven, are, when unaccompanied by kind thoughts and mild language, the sources of very painful impressions. To enter fully into the character of Halley would require more time and space than can now be assigned to it ; but there is one point which must not be passed over. To call him a “ self-convicted infidel ” is, to say the least, strong language, which when applied to the mighty dead, should not have been used without mature consideration. The authority, from which it is derived, was probably Whiston’s account of the election in 1691 to the Savilian Professorship. The application, that Whiston makes of it to his own case, might have suggested the possibility of some bias in the direction which he gives to the story; and as the question is now about Halley’s own view of his opinions, we have much better evidence ina letter which he wrote on the 22nd of June, in the same year, to Mr. Abra- ham Hill, which proves that, so far from submitting of neces- sity to an examination, in which he was likely to bear himself, as Whiston reports, with unbending defiance towards Bentley, he courted the inquiry in confidence of being able to clear himself from the charge which was brought against him. ‘The letter like- wise supplies us with the definite nature of this charge ; for it mentions a caveat having been entered against him till he could show that he was “ not guilty of asserting the eternity of the 220 Prof. Rigaud, on Newton, Whiston, world.” This objection necessarily* involved his being an atheist, and not merely a sceptic as Whiston ‘says, which shows again the inaccuracy of his relation. It may be from the fault of a bad memory, it may be from a limited extent of reading, but I can at this moment recall to my recollection no one passage, in which Halley has published anything pro- fane ; and I may add that in some disquisitions on the general deluge, which he published in the Philosophical Transactions, he treats the Scripture account with all due respect. ‘These disquisitions seem also to supply a clue to the cause of the ca- veat; for having reasoned on the dislocations visible on the earth’s surface, he subjoined an explanation of his hypothesis, because it was suggested to him that those changes might rather have happened in times before the Mosaic creation, (when a former world was possibly reduced to chaos, out of whose ruins the present might be formed,) than at the period of the Deluge. This, in the eyes of many religious persons, may then have amounted to a heinous offence; but whether it did so with justice may now be safely left to the determination of Christian geologists. The passage immediately referred to occurs indeed in the Philosophical Transactions for 1724; but Halley had treated of the Deluge in the 190th number of the same collection, which, having been published in 1687, makes it not improbable that he may then, in discussing the subject among his friends, have used the same topics, and have thus raised the storm which burst on him in 1691. But to return to the term originally objected to: it was proposed, in 1691, to send in testimonials of Halley’s character to the electors of the Savilian Professor; and the form, in one part, said that his friends recommended him from their * own long experience of his mathematical genius, probity, sobriety, and good life.” * This, perhaps, should not be assumed as a necessary consequence, lest injustice should be done to those philosophers, both heathen and Chris- tian, who, salva pietate, have entertained the notion of the eternity of the world as the coexistent effect of an Eternal Intelligent Cause ; the Stoics, for instance, Volkelius, &c. Writers on Natural Theology now considered as of the highest authority, following the example set by Crellius, are, we believe, disposed to place most reliance upon the arguments to be derived from the course of nature daily presented to the view, as being of the greatest efficacy, both with or- dinary minds and with those to whom abstruse questions respecting the materia prima, &c, may have suggested themselves. “Nunc id,” says Crellius, ‘quod tota Peripateticorum, imo et Platoni- corum schola, non modo fatetur, sed et urget, probabimus, nempe res hujus universi omnes finis gratid existere; sed ita, ut controversiam de materia primd, queecunque tandem ea sit, non faciamus nostram.”—Crellius, De Deo et ejus Attributis, cap. iii.,in which work he was assisted by Stanislaus Lubje- niecius, a Polish nobleman, the author of the Theatrum Cometicum.—R. T.] Halley, and Flamsteed, 221 This passage is copied from a paper in Halley’s own hand- writing, and shows that ‘self-convicted” is the last term which can with propriety be applied to him. I hope that I feel as much as any man a deep abhorrence of irreligion, and I would not say a word to palliate its baneful nature; but to overload accusations of this kind with unsupported preju- dice seems to me to be the surest way of destroying their effect. That anything should have induced Newton to use harsh language to Flamsteed is sincerely to be deplored; but there are circumstances not to be neglected which may be gathered from Flamsteed’s own account of what passed on the 26th of Octeber 1711. His ironical thanks and recommendation to restraint of passion, were no soothers of irritation. While the accusation of robbery was dwelt on, it must be remembered that Newton was under the persuasion of Flamsteed having *¢ called him an atheist”; that Flamsteed, when this was men- tioned, left him, without the slightest notice, in error on so grave a point; and though he denies that he had uttered it, he does not deny that he had entertained the suspicion; for he only adds, “I hope he is none.” If Newton, under such provocation, had remained unmoved, he would have been not merely (as he was) one of the first of men, but he must have been more than man; if the mildness of his natural temper had not wholly unfitted him for personal altercation, he never could have used such an unappropriate appellation as ‘ puppy ’ —how he would have expressed himself if more familiar with the Janguage of reproach, I am unwilling to inquire. When Newton called for the catalogue of stars, ** It would neither be prudent nor safe,” Flamsteed said, “to trust a copy of them out of my own keeping. He [Newton] answered, ‘that I might put them into his hands sealed up; whereby I understood they were to be so kept by him till I had finished the whole, and was ready to print it.” Here then was no ** solemn pledge”; not even any express conditions or precise explanation are said to have accompanied the delivery. Now Newton’s undoubted object was to secure the publication of the catalogue, and as Flamsteed had taken his own view for himself, Newton may, on his side, have understood that the precaution of the seal was only to make the papers “safe” until the time came for printing them. There are difficulties about the story of this seal being broken, for it is told (I do not mean intentionally) without sufficient precision. Every honest mind revolts against a breach of trust; but we ought to be well convinced of the character of the act and of the crimi- nality of the person against whom it is alleged, before we pour 222 Prof. Rigaud, on Newton, Whiston, out our indignation against him. The description (in p. 294) seems to refer to the packet which was put into Newton’s hands in 1705, and in another place (No. 163) Flamsteed says that the seal was broken when the catalogue was returned to him in 1708; but neither in his personal narrative (p. 86) nor in his letter to Sharp (No. 135), does he make any such complaint as he probably would, if the circumstance had oc- curred at that time. The sextant observations were com- pletely printed in 1707, and the managers decided on the ex- pediency of immediately proceeding with the catalogue; they may, therefore, have then considered the time to have arrived when it was necessary to open and examine the document; but there are particulars which seem rather to indicate that they had not broken the seal till a later period. Whether they were right or wrong in the proposed arrangement of the publication does not affect the question of the fact, and it is clear that nearly four years having elapsed, during which they could not overcome Flamsteed’s opposition to their intentions, they determined to wait no longer for his concurrence. The Queen’s order to proceed with the publication appears to have been issued in the beginning of 1711, and this seems to be the probable time when the seal was broken. It is inconceiv- able that Newton would have pleaded the authority of the Queen’s order for what had taken place in 1708; and if he had, it is highly improbable that Flamsteed would have failed to notice so obvious a contradiction. By comparing Nos. 100, 104, and 199, it may be seen that, when irritated, Flamsteed could forget what he had written, and in the hurry of vexation he has here made a confusion in his narrative. Surely, therefore, it would be unjust, without more complete know- ledge of particulars, tocondemn Sir Isaac Newton and all his friends on such an accusation, which is neither explained nor corroborated by any concurring evidence. In such a case it would be more fair to judge of the story by his established character, than to sacrifice his character for the establishment of the story. One thing, however, may be fairly presumed,— that the Queen’s order justified what was done; for Flamsteed in his reflections does not appeal from it, but confines his complaint to the authority not having been really obtained, or not till after the offence had been committed, (which latter supposition is introduced as if the first broader assertion was immediately accompanied by some doubts of its accuracy). In the reference to what Halley says on the thirty years of Flamsteed’s life, at Greenwich, the writer would have done well to have looked to the original. It is indeed said, in the preface, that during that time “ nihil prodierat”—-and nothing i Halley, and Flamsteed. 223 had been published ; but, as Mr. Whewell had observed, it is added immediately after, “tot annos non effluxisse otiosos, schedasque Grenovicenses in haud modicam crevisse molem.” The whole, therefore, together is a plain statement of an un- deniable truth. The work which is regularly done in the execution of any employment belongs of course to the employer, and his hav- ing made a hard bargain in no way affects his right. Any one, therefore, engaged in a great scientific work, was entitled to apply to the Astronomer Royal for assistance from his un- published observations, when they had accumulated for years and there was no immediate prospect of their publication. A discretionary power certainly rested with the observer, but it referred to the nature and object of the application, and whe- ther, if not immediately sanctioned by the Crown, it was such as to imply a fair presumption of the Royal approbation: the power did not extend to an arbitrary refusal. Flam- steed may be considered as obliging Newton whenever he readily communicated his official labours to him, but the soni part of what he specifically “worked for Sir Isaac ewton” consisted in the reduction of his observations, an operation, in which he appears to have persisted contrary to the expressed wishes of Newton (No. 30). «¢ The sacrifice to heavenly truth” was not a holocaust of 300 copies of the book, for 388 pages of each were retained by Flamsteed, and form a part of the Ist vol. of the Historia Celestis. The whole that was burnt was the title and pre- face, with the catalogue, and 120 pages extracted from the later observations—about one fourth of what had been printed by the referees. That 100/. per annum was too small a payment to the astro- nomer royal does not admit of a doubt; but his office existed long before the importance of it was rightly understood, and Burstow was a Crownliving, which was given to Flamsteed by Lord Keeper North to set him more at his ease. This is not the manner in which the astronomer royal ought to be remu- nerated for his services; but in those days it was probably thought an easy method of saving the public money. This in no degree diminishes the injustice of not supplying him with what was necessary for the Observatory; and, although he certainly looked to some return from the sale of his observa- tion, this was a miscalculation of what the market was likely to produce. Newton, in 1691, (No. 14,) had said to Flamsteed, “ If you and I live not long enough, Mr. Gregory and Mr. Halley are young men.” The office of astronomer royal was a fair ob- 224 Prof. Rigaud, on a Note in the Quarterly Review. ject of honourable ambition, but those who accuse Halley of the endeavours to supplant his predecessor, are bound to bring forward direct facts, not surmises, in support of the charge. With such an object, it was the more disinterested in him to hold that the salary ought not to be augmented. He may have done so in Flamsteed’s time, but I am not acquainted with the authority for it. I have always heard that the objec- tion was made by him to Queen Caroline, when she visited the Observatory, and expressed a wish for the inadequate payment being increased. From a document in the British Museum it is clear that this could not have taken place before September 1729. Halley, then, for nearly ten years conti- nued himself to receive only the original “ pitiful salary” ; the report was erroneous, which Crosthwait heard, of his having in 1728 got an addition of 100/. per annum (No. 279.); and after all, he only obtained the further pay of the rank which he had held in the navy. There are some particulars respecting Halley’s observations which ought to be added to the writer’s account, because they bear immediately on the present question. It was on the 2nd of March 1727 that Sir Isaac Newton reminded the Council of the Royal Society that they had neglected their duty by not having of late demanded, in obedience to the Queen’s order, the fair copy of the annual observations. We see, therefore, that Newton’s earnestness on this point did not originate in any personal feeling against Flamsteed, and the minute shows that he took the opportunity of Halley’s being present to make the representation. ‘The whole is given by Mr. Baily (in the Memoirs of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. viii. p. 188.), and he adds, * It is worthy of remark, that this was the last meeting of the Royal Society at which Sir Isaac Newton was present, as he died on the 20th of the same month.” It is not indeed improbable that his death was hastened by this exer- tion of the good old man in the execution of what he consi- dered to be a duty. Hearne says, in one of his memorandum books, ‘Some time before he died, a great quarrel happened be- tween him and Dr. Halley.......This ’tis thought so much discomposed Sir Isaac as to hasten his end.” Sir David Brewster, in his Life of Newton, has alluded (p. 339) to this circumstance, but he does not seem to have noticed the time to which it refers. Halley, it must be admitted, in this case was wrong. His withholding the required documents and taking up Flamsteed’s idea of the observations being private property were possibly, after Newton’s death, never interfered with; and by the tacit acquiescence of the Government, not only the rights of the Crown were virtually abandoned, but the Whiston, Halley, and the Quarterly Review. 2925 claims of the astronomer royal were confirmed by long-con- tinued usage. *,.* I have much regretted the line which has heen taken by the Reviewers. The public mind will be made up on the differences between Newton and Flamsteed, and after a time this history will be left to the few who are curious about such subjects; but while new, there was something exciting in it, and it has been put prominently forward, while the British Catalogue, as republished by Mr. Baily, has been noticed with merely transient praise. Now this is certainly not the least valuable part of a very valuable volume. It is a work of useful and lasting’ reference for the astronomer, which pos- sibly no one would have undertaken excepting the person to whom we are indebted for it, and which no one could have executed who had not, with the advantages of modern science, been, like him, for years familiar with the Historia Celestis. XLIII. On Whiston, Halley, and the Quarterly Reviewer of the * Account of Flamsteed.” By A CorrEsPoNDENT. To the Editors of the Philosophical Magazine and Journal. GENTLEMEN, Manchester, Feb. 20. HE Note on Mr. Whewell in the late Quarterly Review is sufficiently revolting on account of its coarseness, and the insulting imputation on that gentleman of having pre- sumed upon his official station in the University, and treated the subject of Newton and Flamsteed as ifhe were palming his opinions upon undergraduates. Now I leave it to the readers of Mr. Whewell’s letter to judge if ever imputation could be more unfounded, and if his letter be not altogether free from all appearance of assumption of the authority either of his office or (what is much more) of his high scientific reputation. But what is still more reprehensible is the barefaced disin- genuousness which the writer displays. What can be a more palpable misrepresentation than that contained in the follow- ing passage relating to Whiston: “ If, therefore, he was the worthless, shallow person that Mr. Whewell would have us to believe....”? Now what Mr. Whewell really says of Whiston is, that his yudgement is worthless. What is this, but an attempt to deceive the reader ? Another instance of this utter want of principle is displayed in the writer’s reviling Halley for the very same conduct Third Series. Vol. 8. No. 46. March 1836. 2B 226 Whiston, Halley, and the Quarterly Review. which he had in the preceding page eulogized in Whiston, namely, that he would not dissemble his religious opinions. ¢ The secret history,” says he, “of the enmity against Whis- ton, is his conscientious departure from the doctrine of the ‘Church of England, and his adoption of the principles of Arianism.” While of Halley he says, “ Mr. Whewell cannot be ignorant that Halley was a self-convicted infidel, and that he lost an honourable and lucrative situation by being so;—and therefore, it seems’ more than probable that Flamsteed was ‘disgusted with him.” It must be evident to everybody that the opprobrious term “ self-convicted” must have been meant to impute to Halley a consciousness of guilt, of moral depravity*: and his devia= tion from orthodoxy, whatever it was, and ingenuous acknow- ledgement of it, are, to suit the purposes of detraction, stig+ matized as a disgraceful crime, while Whiston’s, in order to make him an auxiliary, 1 is justified and even praised as **a con- scientious departure.” Let us try the question by making the ‘terms change sides. Why did he not call Halley’s “a Y con scientious departure,” and Whiston “a self-convicted Arian” ? —evidently to serve the cause of falsehood by insinuating a prejudice. As for the term infidel, we know how vaguely and inconsiderately, and malignantly, it has often been used ; and that Newton himself was even called an atheist by some of his contemporaries}. ‘Che character and extent of the de- viation of these distinguished men from any standard of opi- nion is wholly another consideration: but the moral quality of the fact of their entertaining and avowing their convictions is the same. With regard to Halley, Whiston’ s account bears direct testimony to his sincerity and disinterestedness. I will only add, that the Note is, with regard to honesty, of the same stamp with the article which it vainly attempts to defend ; and remain, Gentlemen, yours, &c. C.S. * Sirrah, ’tis conscience makes you squeak. So saying, on the fox ke flies. The self-convicted felon dies.—Gay’s Fables, ii. 1. + Even in our own time a venerable and pious divine and distinguished naturalist has not escaped similar malignity from one who aspired to be a competitor; see Phil. Mag. and Annals, N.S. vol. x. p. 373: and in the Morning Chronicle, a journal pretending to great liberality, these philoso- phers, who from their ascribing to the Creator the power of enduing mat- ter with life and thought, are denominated materialists, have also lately been stigmatized as atheists. [ 297 J : XLIV. An Abstract of a Memoir on Physical Geology ; with a further Exposition of certain Points connected with the Sulject. By W. Horxins, Esq., M.A., F.G.S., of St. Peter’s College, Cambridge.* JN a memoir entitled “ Researches in Physical Geology,” lately printed for the Transactions of the Cambridge Phi- losophical Society, I have endeavoured to develop, by reason- ing founded on mechanical principles, and by mathematical methods, the effects of an elevatory force acting simulta- neously at every point beneath extensive portions of the crust of the earth, in producing in it dislocations and elevations such as we now recognise. I have not there, however, at- tempted to give any exposition of the mechanical principles on which the investigations are founded, beyond what was necessary to make the subject intelligible to persons familiar with investigations of a similar character ; but, with the hope that the interest which the subject of elevations must always possess in the estimation of the speculative geologist may appertain in some measure to any new theoretical views re- specting it, I have now been induced to attempt a somewhat more detailed and popular exposition of the mechanical con- siderations which have entered into my own investigations, and which must in some measure, I conceive, enter into all others on similar points possessing any claim to a demonstra- tive character. I cannot expect to remove difficulties inhe- rent in such investigations, and which must be felt to be con- siderable even by those best prepared to enter upon them; but if I should succeed in so far diminishing them as to ren- der the subject more accessible by the only way in which, in my Opinion, it can be successfully approached, my object will be accomplished. What I have now written may be consi- dered as an abstract of a considerable portion of my memoir, with a somewhat more detailed exposition of several points connected with the subject of it. When natural phenomena, characterized by general laws, have suggested to us a general cause to which they may be re- ferred, our first object must be to investigate the consequences of this cause acting under certain conditions, and to compare our results with those deduced from observation. Observa-~ tion, however, unaided by theory, can rarely accomplish more than to detect approximations, more or less accurate, to those perfectly definite laws which the phenomena would * Communicated by the Author. 2B2 228 Mr. Hopkins’s Abstract of his Memoir on Physical Geology. accurately follow under the influence of the principal cause alone to which they are referrible. The coincidence between these perfectly definite laws and those deduced from our as- sumed general cause, independently of perturbing ones, must afford the strongest test of the truth of our assumption. The strength of the evidence thus derived, will of course depend in such cases upon the accuracy of the approximation to de- finite laws in the observed phazenomena ; but it is important to observe, that this first approximation must always be the most important one, and that it must be made the instant we begin to speculate on the causes of such phenomena as I have al- luded to, if the slightest value is to attach to our speculations; and also that accurate (or what is synonymous in all, or at least in all but the simplest cases,) mathematical methods of investigating the effects which would result from our assumed general cause, are just as necessary in the case we are sup- posing, as if the observed phenomena presented accurate co- incidences with the general laws to which they only approxi- mate. These remarks (sufficiently trite perhaps) are made with the view of meeting directly the vulgar objection of the use- lessness of applying mathematical investigations to geological problems. ‘To assert this is, in fact, equivalent to the asser- tion that that branch of the science with which we are imme- diately concerned presents no phzenomena characterized by general laws, or referrible to a definite and simple cause. Such however is not the case. The phenomena do distinctly approximate to obvious geometrical laws, and there is a sim- ple cause to which they may be referred, the effects of which it has been my object in the memoir in question to investigate on mechanical principles, in order that we may compare the laws obtained from these results with those to which the ob- served phenomena are found to approximate. The phenomena with which we are chiefly concerned in these investigations are those dislocations of the crust of the globe, which we recognise more particularly in faults and mineral veins, or rather in the narrow fissures in which what is properly termed the mineral vein is deposited. ‘The latter phenomena might, in fact, be almost entirely comprehended in the former, since it is found very generally, where mineral veins occur in stratified masses, that the strata are somewhat higher on one side of the vein than the other. In general this difference of level (not exceeding, perhaps, a few feet) is not sufficient to be designated as a fault, though it sometimes increases so much as to be considered such. In these cases it would appear absurd to suppose that the fissure of the Mr. Hopkins’s Abstract of his Memoir on Physical Geoiogy. 229 mineral vein and the fault are not to be referred to the same mechanical origin, or that other veins in the same district should not be referred to the same cause as such an one as that just described, from which, except where the above-mentioned difference of level becomes great, they differ in no respect. It is also highly important to observe, that (as far as investi- gation has yet proceeded,) where faults and mineral veins co- exist in the same district, they follow, with reference to their positions, precisely the same laws. I do not mean, however, to maintain that all mineral veins are necessarily to be referred to the same mechanical cause. I conceive that some of the Cornish veins—those, for instance, of St. Austle Moor—are clearly referrible to some cause quite distinct from that in which the veins of our limestone districts have originated. The latter possess, I believe, universally the characters which lead us to regard them as having originated, like faults, in dislocations produced by mechanical violence, while the former are almost totally destitute of these charac- ters. It would, therefore, be absurd to conclude that these two classes of veins have necessarily had the same origin. It is not, however, from d@ priori considerations that these points are to be finally decided: but since the evidence of dislocation afforded by a fault is independent of its vertical magnitude, I cannot but regard the mineral veins of our limestone di- stricts as indicative of dislocations in the masses in which they exist, equally with the faults with which they are so fre- quently associated. I therefore regard them in this point of view; the correctness of our doing so must, of course, be ul- timately tested by the harmony which may exist between our theoretical deductions involving this hypothesis, and the phz- nomena which these veins actually present to us. The planes of these dislocations approximate, in the first place, to verticality ; and, secondly, their horizontal directions bear distinct relations to the general configuration of the elevated district in which they exist. If there be a central axis of elevation, the directions of dislocation are approxi- mately parallel or perpendicular to it, as is the case in most of our mining districts; and if there be a central point of ele- vation, these directions diverge from it as a centre. Such appears to be the case in Mount Etna, and the groups of the Cantal and Mont Dor. The lake district in this country pro- bably affords a similar instance. These are the laws established by observation, so far as it has yet extended. Many anomalous cases may possibly exist, but they will not invalidate the conclusion, that, so far as the phenomena are characterized by these laws, they are 230 Mr. Hopkins’s Abstract of his Memoir on Physical Geology. attributable to the action of some general cause, at least as ex tensive in its operation as the district throughout which the phenomena are observed to follow the same law without breach of continuity. This cause is assumed to be that which naturally suggests itself to the mind of every geologist, viz. an elevatory force acting simultaneously at every point of a por- tion of the earth’s crust, of at least the extent just intimated, and of any assigned thickness. It is manifest, that the eleva- tion of this mass must produce in it extension, and consequent tension, which, if of sufficient intensity, will cause those dis- locations or fissures which we now recognise in the phzeno- mena already alluded to. These fissures must, according to this theory, be regarded as the primary phenomena, with which all the other phzenomena of elevation, as faults, mineral veins, anticlinal lines, &c., are connected as secondary ones. I have carefully abstained in my memoir from any specula- tions on the causes which might produce this elevatory force— I merely assume its existence. It is easy, however, to con- ceive such a force to act as above supposed, if we assume the existence of a cavity beneath the elevated mass, either origi- nally coextensive with it, or rendered so by the action of the elevatory force itself. Any vapour or matter in a state of fluidity from heat, forced into this cavity, or expanded there, will produce the elevatory force which I assume to have acted. This appears to be the simplest mode in which we can con- ceive such a force to be produced; and if we choose to set out from the more remote hypothesis of the earth’s having been originally fluid, it might probably be shown that the formation of cavities such as above supposed, would, under simple conditions, be the necessary consequence of that pro- cess of cooling by which we must then suppose the crust of the globe to have assumed its present solidity. Instead, how- ever, of assuming the existence of a cavity, we might suppose a portion of the solid matter of the earth, at a certain depth beneath its surface, to become by some means expanded, and by its expansion to elevate the superincumbent mass. This hypothesis, as far as my investigations are concerned, would equally suffice, as, in fact, would any other by which we could account for the simultaneous action of an elevatory force upon a portion of the earth’s crust of sufficient extent. For many reasons, however, independent of my immediate object, I should not hesitate to reject this latter hypothesis as generally insufficient to account for observed phzenomena, and as in- volving serious physical difficulties. If we adopt the hypothesis of internal cavities, we may observe that there is no reason why we should not suppose them to exist, not only at differ- Mr. Hopkins’s Abstract of his Memoir on Physical Geology. 23% ent depths in different places, but also along the same vertical line, so that one shall be placed under another. It might, L conceive, be shown to be highly probable, if we should again recur to the hypothesis of the original fluidity of the globe, that the deeper cavities would in such case be the more ex- tensive. The immediate consequence of the elevatory force, as al- ready remarked, will be to produce eatension, and consequent tensions, in the elevated mass. Our first object must be to determine the directions of these tensions, for the purpose of ascertaining those of the resulting fissures. We shall after- wards consider the influence of the constitution of the elevated mass ; at present it is only necessary to regard it as admitting of a certain small extension without rupturing. I. For the greater simplicity let us first suppose the ele- vated mass to be of indefinite length, of uniform depth, and bounded laterally by two vertical parallel planes, beyond which the disturbance does not extend. Let A B B! A! bea section of the mass by a vertical plane perpendicular to the axis of ele- vation, A C B originally coinciding with A B; and let us also suppose that every such section is precisely similar and equal. Then it is manifest that there can be no extension perpendi- cular to these sections*, and that, consequently, the whole ex- tension must lie in directions perpendicular to the axis of elevation. Now let us conceive for a moment the elevated mass to consist merely of a very thin continuous lamina of it, ACB. Then it is evident that the extension, and therefore the tension, at any point, as C, in the section, must be in the direction T C 'T’ of a tangent to the curve line ABC. Let us now conceive another lamina, similar to the first, but with- out any adhesion to it, superposed upon it. It is clear that its extension, and, therefore, its tension, must be precisely the same as that of the first lamina, always supposing the original * The hypothesis of indefinite length in the elevation is equivalent to that of its being terminated by sections equal and similar to the one de- scribed in the text, so far as relates to’ the absence of longitudinal ex- tension. 232 Mr. Hopkins’s Abstract of his Memoir on Physical Geology. unextended dimensions of each to have been the same. Again, suppose a third lamina superimposed in the same manner, and then a fourth, and so on, till a mass of any as- signed thickness shall have been thus composed. It will then follow, from what has been shown, that the tension at any point c of the mass in this state must lie in the plane of the section, and in the direction to the tangent of the curve-line acb, formed by the intersection of the vertical plane of the section with the lamina in which the point ¢ may be situated. The only difference between this hypothetical mass and any proposed actual mass of the same form and dimensions, will consist in this—that in the former there is no cohesion whatever between the successive ]aminz of which we have supposed it to be formed. If, however, our lamine should be superposed on each other in their unextended state, and made to cohere firmly together, (in which case the mass would differ in no wise from any actual mass,) and then elevated to the position represented in the diagram, it is easily seen that the position of each point of the mass would be exactly the same as in the hypothetical case above stated. Consequently, the extension of any portion of the mass (and therefore the tension) must be the same in the two cases. Hence then it follows that if A BB! A! represent any actual elevated mass, the direction of the tension at any point ¢ will be that of the tangent line at that point as above described. There is no difficulty in extending reasoning precisely si- milar to the above to any more complicated form of the ele- vated mass, of which the upper and lower surfaces were ori- ginally parallel, and horizontal, and we shall arrive at this conclusion.—J/ we conceive the mass, previous to its elevation, to be composed of horizontal lamine (or thin strata) the direc- tions of the tensions at any proposed point of the mass when ele- vated but still unbroken, will lie in the tangent plane to the curved surface formed by that originally horizontal lamina in which the proposed point may be situated ; and the intensity of the tensions will be the same*, in different lamine at points similarly situated in each. If the mass in its undisturbed position be not of uniform depth, (2. ¢. if the upper and lower surfaces be not parallel,) the above reasoning would not be accurately applicable. ‘The case, however, we have considered may be taken as the stand- ard one to which others will approximate with more or less accuracy, particularly as physical reasons might be assigned * There are causes why this should be only very approximately true, (See Memoir, p, 42.) Mr. Hopkins’s Abstract of his Memoir on Physical Geology. 233 why an extensive cavity within the earth should be nearly horizontal. Adhering then to this case, it is manifest that the extension of each component lamina of the mass will depend on the form assumed by it when the mass is elevated, since its boundaries, by hypothesis, remain immoveable. Consequently the direction of the tension in the tangent plane before men- tioned must also depend upon the form of the lamina. This direction is not generally horizontal, but since it will usually be nearly so, and will always determine the horizontal direc- tion, or azimuth, of a vertical plane drawn through it, we shall be understood when it may be convenient to speak of the ho- rizontal tensions. It is manifest then that the determinations of the directions of the tangential tensions in the elevated mass, must in cases such as the above be a purely geometrical problem, as may be easily elucidated by a few instances. In the elevation already described (of which the segment of a cylinder, by a plane parallei to its axis, may be regarded as the approximate type, and which may therefore be termed cylindrical) it has been shown that this tension lies entirely in a vertical plane perpen- dicular to the axis. If the elevation approximate to the form of a cone (which may be conceived to be formed by the super- position of similar conical shells), it may be shown*, that if each lamina remain unbroken, the direction of the only ten- sion will be parallel to the slant side of the cone, and will pass through its axis; but that if a dislocation exist along the ver- tical axis, the principal tension at any proposed point (parti- cularly near the vertex) will be perpendicular to the vertical plane passing through that point and the axis, there being also another tension in that plane. If again the form of the elevation should approximate to the segment of a sphere, there will be two tensions at each point of the mass, one of which will lie in the plane through the proposed point and the verti- a axis of the elevation, the other being perpendicular to that ane. The above are some of the most simple forms which the elevated masscan be conceived to assume; they may, how- ever, be taken as the approximate types of many of the general elevations which present themselves to our observation, con- sidered independently of their local irregularities. When the superficial boundary of the elevated mass is very irregular, (particularly if the superficial extent be not very great,) the directions of greatest extension, or of greatest tension, will be very different in different points; and it may become very dif- * See Memoir, p. 47. 234 Mr. Hopkins’s Abstract of his Memoir on Physical Geology: ficult to calculate with any precision the resulting phenomena. Cases however may easily be conceived without such diffi- culty, though more complicated than the simple ones above, alluded to. Suppose, for instance, recurring to ‘our hypothesis of internal cavities, one cavity of great extent to exist at a cer-. tain depth, and another smaller one within the mass above the; former, and communicating with it, so that any fluid pressure acting in the lower should be communicated immediately to the upper one. ‘That portion of the elevated mass which lies directly above the upper and smaller cavity, may manifestly be subjected simultaneously to the tension impressed upon the whole mass from the action of the elevatory force in the larger cavity, and to that produced by the partial elevation above the smaller one. ‘These two sets of tensions may be conceived to be superimposed the one on the other, in the same manner as any two sets of forces in equilibrium may be so superimposed *. ‘Their intensities and directions will de- pend on the forms of the general and partial elevations re- spectively. ‘Thus we may have a partial elevation of which a cone or segment of a sphere should be the approximate type, superimposed upon a general one of which the type should be the segment of a cylinder. Other combinations might be formed in a similar manner. Should it appear preferable to consider the subject inde- pendently of the hypothesis of internal cavities, we have only, to conceive our partial elevations to be produced by a more intense action of the elevatory force at those points. As re- ards the resulting state of tension, it is perfectly immaterial which hypothesis we adopt. The states of tension above described refer to the mass in its elevated but unbroken state, z.e. previously to the formation of those fissures which must of course be formed when the tension shall become greater than the cohesive power of the mass. ‘The tension will begin to be produced at the instant the act of elevation commences, and will increase till it ac- quires the intensity just mentioned. Z7zme will be necessary for this, but it may possibly be so short as to give to the ac- tion of the elevatory force the character of an impulsive action, which would probably produce the most irregular phzeno- mena, and such as would be altogether without the sphere of calculation. I exclude therefore the hypothesis of this kind of action, not as involving in itself any manifest improbability, but as inconsistent with the existence of distinct approxima- * One of these sets of tensions may possibly modify the other, but in a general explanation, or in a first approximate calculation, this modifica- tion may be neglected. a Mr. Hopkins’s Abstract of his Memoir on Physical Geology. 285 tions to general laws in the resulting phenomena. It would: appear probable however that the time above mentioned will be short, and I therefore assume it to be so, and that conse- quently the tensions increase rapidly but continuously from zero to that degree of intensity which is necessary to over- come the cohesive power of the elevated mass. This assump- tion has also the advantage of facilitating some parts of the mathematical investigation*. It will, perhaps, be somewhat more convenient for our further investigations, if we conceive the tensions at different points of one of our elevated, but still continuous and un- broken, component laminz, transferred to corresponding points of a plane laminat. For this purpose, imagine each point of the curved lamina projected on a plane horizontal one, and that the same tension exists at each point of the latter, as at the point of the former, of which it is the projec- tion; the direction of each tension in the horizontal lamina being the projection upon it of that of the corresponding tension in the curved one. Now one of our ultimate objects will be, to determine the horizontal directions of the fissures which must result in the elevated mass, when the tensions be- come of sufficient intensity to produce them, and these direc- tions may be considered as coinciding with those which would be produced in our hypothetical horizontal lamina. Conse- quently our investigation will be reduced to the determination of these latter directions. To elucidate this, suppose our general elevation to be such as first mentioned above, or what I have termed cylindrical. Its projection on a horizontal plane will be a parallelogram, D EK G F represented by DE FG. Suppose also a partial elevation * See Memoir, p. 21. + We may remark that the vertical elevation of the disturbed mass, in the state above described, is always extremely small compared with its horizontal extent. 236 The Rev. Dr. Robinson on the Aurora of approximately spherical, superimposed upon the general one, such that O shall be the projection of its vertical axis, and the dotted circle that of the circumference of its base. Then taking P as the projection of any proposed point in the par- tial elevation, we must suppose applied there, first, a tension (F) impressed on the mass generally perpendicular to D E; secondly, a tension (/,) in a direction passing through O (see p- 233); and thirdly, another tension /, perpendicular to P O. From these data the directions of the fissure through P, when the tensions become sufficient to produce it, must be deter- mined. And here we may remark, that since one lamina of our elevated mass will be similar to another, the tensions Ff, and f;, will be very approximately the same for each; and that consequently the direction of the fissure just mentioned will equally determine the horizontal direction of the fissure which shall pass through any point of which P is the projec- tion. The extensibility of the mass being assumed to be small, the intensities of the tensions F, f, f,, will be propor- tional to the extension each would produce in the mass at P, if it acted separately, or to the additional extension produced by each when acting simultaneously. The accurate determi- nation of these intensities would in most cases present great difficulties. In general, however, it will be sufficient to con- sider such tensions as f, and jf, (belonging to the partial ele- vation) merely as forces producing modifications in the effects of F, the nature of which can be determined with sufficient accuracy for practical purposes. [To be continued. ] XLV. On the Aurora of November 18th, 1835. By the Rev. T. R. Ropinson, D.D. To the Editors of the Philosophical Magazine and Journal. GENTLEMEN, ih R. STURGEON ’s notice of the aurora of § November 18th (not 16th as misprinted,) induces me to send you the notes which I made of its appearance, as from his positive statement ‘ that he saw no appearance of aurora to the south of the zenith, though frequently looked for,” this seems to be one of the very rare cases where auroral phenomena can be proved to occur in a low region of the atmosphere. They are as follows, the time being reduced to Greenwich. ‘Noy. 18. Sky strongly illuminated, but covered with clouds till 9» 20", when two arches were visible, which broke a November 18th, 1835, as seen at Armagh. 237 suddenly into streamers. The largest was nearly straight, but was met by another band of streamers making an angle with it, thus: a Cygni TTT may Tuc CU | aLyre. # i Ty ya South of the zenith, however, there is a permanent arch, its lower edge on a and y Orionis, and at the crest its altitude is 30° 13'*. Its upper edge passes through the Pleiades, but it is broader there than at the vertex. This greater breadth seems to be a fragment of another arch coalescing with the principal one, and is fading away. «9% 41™, The lower edge is on Aldebaran. The upper still on the Pleiades. <<‘ gh 48™, The arch suddenly becomes more luminous, The altitude of its lower vertex is now 34°21’. A splendid yel- low streamer darts along 30° of its upper edge, parallel to it, (which is new to me, for all that Ihave noticed hitherto were perpendicular to the arches or nearly so ;) with little intermis- sion clouds and rain, but the arch when last seen unchanged. © 108 35™, Clear. The arch has disappeared, but the whole sky is covered with flashes which are brightest to the north.” I may add, that the arch gave sufficient light to read the seconds of my chronometer and note them down, so that it seems impossible that Mr. Sturgeon could have failed to ob- serve it, had it been visible at Woolwich. If this was not the case, then probably the appearance which he describes was the dissolution of my arch, and this meteor must have been lower than any which I have seen. Perhaps some of your correspondents may be able to afford additional infor- mation. Armagh Observatory, Feb. 5, 1836. T. R. Rozinson. * These altitudes were taken by the sextant, bringing the visible hori- zon’s image to the arch, and measuring its altitude (in this case 0° 51’) by a circle in the daylight. , [ 238 J XLVI. An Account of Experiments made at Constantinople on Drummond’s Light, for the purpose of Lighthouse Illu- mination in the Black Sea. By W. H. Bartow, Esgq., Civil Engineer. Communicated by P. Barlow, Esq., F.B.S., in a Letter to the Editors of the Lond. and Edinb. Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. GENTLEMEN, Royal Military Academy, Feb. 4, 1836. I CAN hardly tell how far the following account of experi- ments made on Drummond’s light at Constantinople may be considered deserving a place in your scientific Journal: it is to me highly interesting, on account of the ingenuity and perseverance it displays in the pursuit of a scientific object, under very difficult circumstances; and I think that it must be gratifying to scientific men generally to know that the Turks, hitherto so bigoted to old maxims and religious pre- judices, are availing themselves of the most refined disco- veries of modern philosophy. . It may be well to state, as introductory to the following letter, that Mr. W. H. Barlow has been a resident for some time in Constantinople, for the purpose of constructing a brass- foundery and boring-apparatus, upon a large scale, with a view of remodelling the Turkish artillery; and thet on the re- turn of Namik Pasha from this country, (who had examined with a scrutinizing eye many of our manufacturing and scien- tific establishments, ) Halil Pasha, the sultan’s son-in-law, sent for Mr. Barlow, and spoke to him on the subject of restoring some dilapidated lighthouses in the Black Sea, and requested to know if he was acquainted with a very remarkable light which was known in England under the name of Drum- mond’s lamp. He was answered that he knew of it generally, and that if he could find any description of it in any of his books, he would furnish him with the particulars. Fortunately, on referring to an ingenious Armenian physician, Dr. Zohrab, who had studied at Edinburgh, he fell upon a number of the Nautical Gazette in which an account was given of the light, and on the ground of the information thus obtained the ex- periments detailed in the following letter were undertaken. _ I am, dear Sirs, yours very truly, Peter Bartow. Letter to Peter Barlow, Esq. Constantinople, Jan. 6, 1836. ** T have already informed you of my first experiments on Drummond’s light, and the astonishment it produced in the Experiments on Drummond’s Light made in Turkey. 239 ‘Turks when it first shone forth in all its brilliancy. ‘ Mash- ‘allah allah gunez boo!’ was heard on all sides, and I must ‘acknowledge that my astonishment and delight were no less when I first found my attempts successful, in which Dr. Zohrab ‘equally participated, neither of us having ever seen it in En- ‘gland. I promised you that on my return from examining and ‘reporting on the state of the lighthouses in the Black Sea, I would give you a detailed account of my proceedings, a promise which I now propose to redeem as far as the extent of a letter will permit. ** When Halil Pasha first mentioned the Drummond’s light, ‘having searched my own library in vain for any description, I applied to Dr. Zohrab, who, having studied in Edinburgh, and being in the habit of reading English works, I thought might possess the desired information ; and fortunately he had a number of the Nautical Gazette in which was given several particulars of the light, with drawings, and as we were reading of its beauties, a sudden thought struck us of trying to make it. I set to work that night, and made a drawing of the sim- plest apparatus I could conceive capable of producing the de- ‘sired effect, which was as follows. In fig. 1, A and B are two bladders, one containing ‘oxygen, the other hydro- gen. C is the mixing- box, to which they are attached by being firmly tied upon the two project- ing pipes. In this box were placed about thirty pieces of ‘wire gauze, which, by the by, we were sadly at a loss to ob- tain'till we accidentally fell upon two wire-gauze masks which had been used at the last carnival; these were instantly cut up and arranged in the mixing-box, at the upper end of which we attached the small pipe and stopcock as in the figure. The stopcock belonged to an apparatus of Dr. Zohrab’s, and the small pipe wis made by an ingenious Armenian at Ga- leta. Thus prepared, we filled the bladders with the proper gases (after only one unsuccessful attempt), and a piece of lime placed on a lump of clay was put before the jet: a board was then placed on the bladders with a weight on it. We then lighted the jet, and to our inexpressible joy a light instantly burst forth so intense that it was impossible to look directly at it. ‘This being accomplished, and our apparatus appearing safe, I determined to exhibit the light itself to the Pasha, in- stead of the drawing of it which I had promised him. The astonishment and approbation were, as I have stated, very great, and I was immediately dispatched to the Black Sea, to 240 Mr. W. H. Barlow’s Account of Experiments examine and report on the state of the lighthouses. On my return I was requested to make a larger and more complete apparatus, in which I have succeeded to the full extent of my expectation. This last light burns for an hour; it is described below; but I must here first mention a circumstance attending our first exhibition. After this was over, Dr. Zohrab and my- self removed our apparatus, and there being still some gas in the bladders, we lighted it again for our own amusement in my drawing-office, when it exploded with great violence while I was pressing the bladders with my hands. You re- member the explosion of my gases in my little room at Rush- grove Cottage, but that was nothing; this was so sharp that T lost the sensibility of my right ear for nearly a month, and the explosion forced pieces of the bladders quite through the cloth of my trowsers; and yet, excepting my ear, I escaped without injury. In my large lamp it was necessary to have recourse to ga- someters instead of bladders. ‘These, according to Drum- mond’s description, were to act under a pressure of 30 inches of water; and ‘our explosion jhad taught us that this pres- sure must be very equable to prevent the mixing of the gases in any great quantity. Many were the schemes I had, and rejected, but at last I adopted the following :—A, fig. 2, is a cylinder of tin two feet in diameter, and four feet six inches high, closed at the bottom, and open at the top; B is another cylinder, one foot nine inches in diameter, of the same height, having a diaphragm at one foot eight inches from the bottom ; this formed the hydrogen gasometer, and was used as follows: From the bottom of the Jarger cylinder rose a pipe D, to the Fig. 2. ef I m f ‘mn Js N A ~S \ va Wy height of one foot nine inches, and a small recess was made on Drummond’s Light made at Constantinople. 241 an inch deep in the diaphragm of the inner cylinder to receive its end; the inner cylinder, therefore, being placed within the other, its edge rested on the bottom of the latter. To fill the gasometer, the interior cylinder was taken out, and water poured into the other to the level 7; the former was then re- placed, the stopcock ¢ opened, and the air expelled till the diaphragm reached the surface of the water; the gas was now introduced at the stopcock, and the gasometer thereby raised : twenty-seven inches of water were now poured into the part B, which, together with the weight of the tin, made up the whole pressure of thirty inches. This forced part of the water in D up the sides of the vessel, and other water was added till the external water rose to the level L, which is twenty-nine inches above the top of the pipe; and consequently restored the water in the lower part of the gasometer to its original level 7. It is now evident that as many inches of gas as are let off are supplied by the upper part descending ; and the sur- face of the upper and lower diameter being the same, the level of the water at 7 and L always remained the same, and con- sequently the pressure. There is, moreover, very little friction, and the action is soft and equal. The oxygen gasometer was constructed in the same manner; but being only required to hold half the quantity, its area of bottom was made only half the former, the height being the same. The other parts are easily comprehended: c’ is another cock; m, the mixing-box ; S, S, its supports; p, the emission pipe; and ', the lime-ball. Fig. 3 is a plan of the whole, showing both gasometers. The mixing-box is made by soldering the pipe m into the outer pipe , which has a diaphragm pierced with holes; the part of the pipe m projecting through it has also holes round its side. The lamp is lighted thus: the hydrogen being let on by Fig. 3. Hydrogen. its stopcock being opened, passes into m, and through the Third Series, Vol. 8. No. 46. March 1836. 2C 242 Prof. Ritchie on Magnetic Attraction. diaphragm d into c, and passes out through the pipes p p; this is now lighted, and it burns with a red unsteady flame; then the oxygen stopcock is turned gradually, when this gas passes through the holes into c, where it mixes with the hydrogen, and they come out in perfect union at the pipes p,p. The hydrogen cock is now fully opened, and the other cock gra- dually opened and adjusted till the lime-ball gives out its most brilliant light, when the hydrogen flame entirely disappears. The difficulties we encountered and the extraordinary shifts we were put to would be very amusing to you, but they are too long for a letter; suffice it to say, that in the end the ex- periment succeeded beyond our most sanguine expectation. The Pasha was delighted with its performance, and has taken the apparatus to his palace. I have since exhibited to him coal-gas light, which I managed much easier, and have drawn out my estimates for this light and oil; but no doubt the latter will be preferred, and I soon expect to be at work in putting in proper repair the lighthouses of Fanaraki. I am anxi- ously waiting your further description of Beale’s light, which I will also show to the Pasha, who takes great interest in all these matters. Witt Baweae XLVII. Additional Remarks on the Law of Magnetic At- tractions and Repulsions. By the Rev. Wit11aM RitcuHie, LL.D. F.RS.* S Mr. Fox still seems to think that the law of magnetic attractions is inversely as the distance between the ends of the attracting magnets, without any reference whatever to their form, the following considerations will, I think, convince him and every impartial inquirer that the supposed law has no existence in nature. Let two magnets be formed, of plate steel, into the annexed figure, having the poles at P, P’, and consequently further from the ends a, 6 than if the bar were rectangular; then the _ } attraction between those mag- nets will follow very different P Pp’ Jaw from that which exists when the bars are equally broad. The fact is, the supposed law obtained by measuring from the ends of the magnet will change with the length of the magnets, their form, and even with the uniformity of the temper. * Communicated by tke Author. Mr. Woolhouse on the Theory of Gradients on Railways. 243 The law in question, then, being a function of so many va- riable quantities, must be one of extreme complexity, perhaps beyond the powers of the most refined analysis to unfold. XLVIII. On the Theory of Gradients on Railways. By Mr. W.S. B. Wootnouse. To the Editors of the Philosophical Magazine and Journal. GENTLEMEN, S Dr. Lardner and Mr. Barlow, in your Numbers for * January and February, hold out conflicting opinions on the theory of gradients on railways, and have left the subject in a state more calculated to create doubts in the minds of the less informed of your readers than to lead them towards the formation of settled conclusions, perhaps you will favour me with the insertion of a few words, by way of explanation, as far as the philosophy of the question presents itself to my mind. Mr. Barlow, without absolutely saying which of the two solutions is wrong, though probably quite conclusive in his own view of the matter, first states his objection to the arithmetical results of the formula employed by Dr. Lardner for the velocity, in certain cases, then gives an outline of his principle of investigation, and finally expresses himself “ quite content to leave the decision to those whose minds have not already received a bias from preconceived notions of the forces.” Whatever sentiments may prevail as to the compe- tency of my opinions on such a subject, it will at least be acknowledged that I possess the qualification of being free from the bias here alluded to, and I am induced to hope that your readers will, on this very ground, acquit me of any ima- ginable interference in thus undertaking, voluntarily, the ex- amination of a point that has already had the attention of such distinguished individuals. By close and continued application of particular opinions to particular subjects, it is indeed sur- prising how they fix themselves in the mind, and become ulti- mately, whether true or false, of almost a fundamental character, But I donotconsider thisobservation to be applicable to the pre- sent case. It is my wishto simplify and expose the truth as far as Ican perceive it. Ido not, however, intrude the presentremarks in elucidation of the subject without some degree of hesitation, although quite free from apprehension as to their theoretical soundness. ‘To many of your readers, who must be far from satisfied with the present situation of the question, I never- theless feel myself justified in submitting them. 2C2 244 Mr.W. S. B.Woolhouse on the Theory of According to Dr. Lardner, the subject is “totally distinct from the consideration of accelerating forces”; he considers it to be essential that the velocities be continued uniform, and therefore discards everything in the shape of an accelerating force. Now, in order that such a theory may be sustained, it is a well known elementary principle of forces, that the power employed must be always precisely equal to the resistance, or the amount of friction combined with the proper resolved effect of gravity along the railway, observing, however, that in the term friction, we must include the resistance to the motion ex- perienced by the carriages, &c., in passing through the atmo- sphere. We shall not here discuss the practicability of pre- serving this exact balance between the forces at the various changes of inclination ; nor shall we offer any serious objec- tion to the principle that the friction is the same for all veloci- ties, which has received the sanction of general practice, though doubtless inaccurate, as far as regards the effect of the atmosphere. Continuing the notation of the preceding letters, we have ¢ for the moving power that will keep the load moving at a uniform speed V along the level plane; ¢ + sin < for the moving power to keep the load moving at the same uniform speed up the inclined plane; and ¢ —sine for the moving power to sus- tain the same uniform speed down the inclined plane. To the truth of this there cannot be any doubt, if we assume, as Dr. Lardner has done, that the friction ¢ is not altered by the slight inclination of the plane. By following Dr. Lardner’s reasoning, we are hence fairly led to the result that the same amount of mechanical force will be expended in ascending and descending the inclined plane, as in drawing the same load backwards and forwards along the level plane of the same length L. Though Dr. Lardner is certainly justified in stating this conclusion to be a plain result of first principles, it should at the same time be remembered, that it rests solely on the hypo- thesis that the power in each case is to be precisely adapted to the amount of resistance, so as to preserve throughout the the same uniform velocity V. This hypothesis has not been admitted by Mr. Barlow, and it must necessarily fail in deter- mining the effect produced by the deflection of a rail during the transitory passage of the carriages. In this way, it appears to me that the principle advocated by Dr. Lardner carries with it a restriction that entirely unfits it for an objection to what has been advanced by Mr. Barlow, in his Second Re- port, addressed to the directors of the London and Birming- ham Railway Company. On the other hand, * however, I can Gradients on Railways. 245 only come to Mr. Barlow’s conclusion, that it is altogether erroneous, both in theory and practice,” when the assumed maintenance of uniform motion is objectionable, as it most certainly is, in the case of the deflections of rails. Contenting myself at present, then, with the opinion that the contending parties thus view the question of power expended, on differ- ent suppositions as to the way in which it is applied, I shall just take a very brief sketch of the question of velocity, when the motion is not assumed to continue the same through planes of different inclinations. Dr. Lardner supposes that in cases of uniform velocity, the resistance into the velocity is constant, and on this assumption deduces the equations stated by Mr. Barlow in page 97, viz. : tV (¢— sine) v=tV 0 ane This assumed principle is, in my opinion, decidedly inaccurate, more especially when it is contemplated that the carriages will pass along with the uniform velocity so expressed. For uniform motion can only be continued when the moving force continues equalto the resistance; and assuming with Dr. Lardner that the amount of friction is independent of the velocity, the speed will in such a case be quite indeterminate ; or, in other words, the power so applied will sustain uniformly any velocity that may have been previously communicated. It the friction were really independent of the velocity, while a moving force which exactly balances the resistance would maintain uniformly any pre- viously imparted motion, a moving force which exceeded the resistance would transmit the carriages with a velocity con- tinually accelerated, in conformity with what has been said by Mr. Barlow: but as the portion of resistance arising from the atmosphere at least, increases with the velocity, it is evident that the resistance will gradually augment till it balances the moving force, and so a uniform motion will eventually succeed. If the carriages be so acted upon as to retain a uniform velo- city v along a level plane, and with such velocity and moving power they arrive at the upper end of, and proceed down, an clined plane, the investigation given by Mr. Barlow, pages 98 —100, will be strictly accurate on two suppositions, viz. 1. That the friction is independent of the velocity and inclination of the plane; 2. That the action of the moving power is not diminished by the increase of velocity. The former supposi- tion is sanctioned by Dr. Lardner ; the latter, as Mr. Barlow justly observes, if not true, will have the effect of giving the velocity and space passed over, rather in excess of the truth, and therefore the more favourable for a comparison with Dr. Lard- 246 Prof. Forbes on the Undulatory Theory of Heat, and ner’s velocities, which are so much in excess. There can be no doubt as to the inaccuracy of the preceding formula, from which the last-mentioned velocities are calculated, as the prin- ciple from which it is derived is not founded in theory. Yours, &c. February 20, 1836. W.S. B. Wootnouse. XLIX. Note respecting the Undulatory Theory of Heat, and on the Circular Polarization of Heat by Total Reflexion. By James D. Forses, Esq., F.R.SS. L. § E., Professor of Natural Philosophy in the University of Edinburgh. To the Editors of the Philosophical Magazine and Journal. GENTLEMEN, 5 a subject so vast and so little explored as that of radiant heat is undergoing investigation, it is hardly to be expected either that experimentalists should abstain from speculation, or, on the other hand, that such speculations should be, in all cases, happily devised by their authors, or fully apprehended by men of science generally. ‘The more immediate results of M. Melloni’s researches as to the nature of heat, do not seem to me to have been very philosophically stated in such expositions of them as I have seen (at least in English) ; but it is not of this that I at present mean to speak. M. Melloni lately read a paper to the Academy of Sciences stating certain objections to the undulatory theory of heat, on which M. Ampere has lately published some ingenious specu- lative views, but which (so far as I know) has received little or no experimental support except that which I have given in investigating the laws of its polarization. I wish to point out what I conceive to be the present state of the subject, specu- latively regarded, and to mention an additional discovery which I have recently made in confirmation of these views. The arguments which M. Melloni adduces tu prove that light and heat are not the same modification of matter all amount to this,—that they may be separated, often in the most irregular and capricious manner, as when the action of a co- loured medium absorbs certain rays of the luminous spectrum and yet leaves unaltered the symmetry of the heating spec- trum *. Such experiments, or many simpler ones, show that heat is not light, but nothing more. If M. Ampere really meant that the light of the solar spectrum zs the same thing with the heat of the solar spectrum, nothing is easier than to refute it, and I pointed out as distinctly as words can express the fact, that light and heat are apparently separable in my * L’ Institut (Journal), 23rd Dec. 18365. the Circular Polarization of Heat by Total Reflexion. 247 paper on Polarization, Art. 25. “all our experiments point to the first [conclusion], namely, that heat, though intimately partaking of the nature of light, and accompanying it under certain circumstances, is capable of almost complete separation from it under others.” This is all that can be said as to the matter of fact, and includes within it all the experiments quo- ted in M. Melloni’s paper. For it will be found that the dif- ficulties which beset the undulation theory of heat are all addressed to our ignorance, not to our knowledge; they are negative rather than positive; they refer entirely to dispersion and absorption, the two great difficulties of the theory of Young and Fresnel ; and it would be equally presumptuous and unreasonable to expect to find at once in the new and obscure subject of heat a solution of doubts which the far more complete knowledge which we have of the subject of light has been unable to resolve. The objection of the impermeability of one substance to heat which is permeable to light, cannot prove light and heat to be “ two essentially distinct modifica- tions of the condition of the ethereal fluid *;” for the same objection applies to different Aznds of light; a red glass is im- permeable to yellow light, though it is perfectly transparent for red light. To say that this conclusion results from the phzenomena of partial absorption by coloured glasses, is taking advantage of the total ignorance we are in with regard to lu- minous absorption, as a sort of negative argument. The only result is what I have already stated, (and I agree with M. Mel- Joni that it is unanswerable,) that one and the same undulation does not invariably impress the senses of sight and feeling at once. ‘The great difficulty is this—to account for the equal refrangibility of two waves having different properties. This I conceive is the whole difficulty at present. Now I argue that this cannot be urged as an wltimate difficulty until the undulatory theory of dispersion is complete, which, notwith- standing the most remarkable investigations and experiments of Cauchy and Powell, I scarcely think can be admitted to be accomplished. The difference between heat and light must be such that the law of refrangibility shall either be independent of it, or shall admit of one result corresponding to several values of the distinguishing element. ‘Thus, if the length of the wave be the sole distinction, the velocity in a dense medium must admit of a single value for several values of the length; a very sup- posable case, as such functions are frequently periodical +. * TL’ Institut, p. 411, note. _ + Though M. Cauchy’s expression contains a trigonometrical function, it could not physically apply to this supposition, 248 Prof. Forbes on the Undulatory Theory of Heat. Or the distinction may be founded on the extent of displacement of the ethereal particles, or on a want of coincidence with the law of force produced by displacement as commonly assumed, or on a thousand other causes, on which I do not wish to dwell because I see little advantage in presenting premature hypotheses which a year or two may demolish. I cannot help observing, however, in an experimental point of view, that if Sir D. Brewster’s analysis of the solar spectrum he adopted, we have a difficulty in the case of light identical with that in the case of heat. It surely would have been unreasonable to urge against that analysis that it could not be true, because it is contrary to the assumption that colour depends on frequency of vibration ;—and refrangibility solely upon the velocity of a wave :—these are tne very points to be proved, and if we have no breach of analogy between light and heat but on ground still debateable as regards the former, the supporters of calo- rific waves have little to tremble for. Since the experiments of M. Matteucci respecting the in- terference of calorific rays have been treated (and [ am in- clined to think justly) as inconclusive, the proof of the polari- zation and double refraction of heat is the only one to which we can refer with any confidence as a basis of analogical rea- soning. The phenomena of polarization and depolarization of perfectly dark heat I have now succeeded in making as obvious as most of the more ordinary experiments on trans- mission, and I have lately succeeded in completing the ana- logy in one case which seems to put the nature of the calorific emanations beyond a doubt. Fresnel’s marvellous prediction of the circular polarization of light by two internal total re- flexions at certain angles, is justly appealed to as one of the most conclusive evidences in favour of a theory which could foresee so singular a result. By employing a rhomb of rock salt I have obtained precisely analogous results in the case of heat wholly unaccompanied by light*. ‘The loss is so trifling in passing through this amazing substance (the discovery of whose properties I hold to be the most valuable part of M. Melloni’s valuable labours), and the total reflexion so far com- plete, that this curious and complex experiment is almost as easily tried as any of those in common polarization. With such evidence before me I cannot for a moment doubt that the waves (if such there be either in light or heat) pro- duced by non-luminous hot bodies are identical in character with those producing light, that is, that the vibrations are transversal. Before concluding, I beg to mention briefly a decisive ex- * Communicated to the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Ist Feb. 1836. Prof. Daubeny’s Reply to Dr. John Davy. —- 249 periment which I have made to show that conduction has no influence in producing the appearance of polarization. For a statement of the objection I refer to my note inserted in this Journal for November last. It is thus obviated: poe ewes ee T had a tin vessel constructed of the shape shown at A, which had one surface a similar in size and position to the first or polarizing plate used in my experiments, and of which the se-~ condary radiation to the analysing plate was supposed to pro- duce the variations observed. ‘The analysing plate B was laced between the thermo-electric pile P and the vessel A, which was filled with bozling water, and which therefore pro- duced on an enormously exaggerated scale the effects attributed to my mica plate. The vessel A was then turned into the various rectangular positions as regarded B, without any de- cided difference of effect on the pile being observable; indeed, if any, that effect indicated a maximum of heat reaching the pile when the position of the surfaces was unsymmetrical, or when in polarizing, it is least. This experiment was also re- peated for the case of polarization by reflexion. By a particular process (which I will take another oppor- tunity of describing,) I have been enabled to prepare mica plates, which, whilst they polarize more effectively than my former ones, are of extreme tenuity, so that they are almost incapable of becoming sensibly heated. With such plates I can polarize about 50 per cent. of heat wholly unaccompanied by light, and readily polarize the heat of boiling water. I am, Gentlemen, yours truly, Edinburgh, 12th Feb. 1836. James D. Forses. ee L. Reply to some Remarks contained in Dr. John Davy’s Life of Sir Humphry Davy. By Cuartes Davseny, M.D., Professor of Chemistry, 5¢-5 Oxford. Mr. Eprror, N Dr. Davy’s lately published book, entitled “* Memoirs of the Life of Sir Humphry Davy,” occurs a passage reflecting on myself, on which I feel myself called upon to offer a few re- marks. 250 Prof. Daubeny on Sir H. Davy’s Theory of Volcanos, After noticing his brother’s change of opinion with respect to the cause of volcanos, Dr. Davy proceeds as follows: ‘It would hardly be supposed, that my brother’s motives for modifying his views respecting the nature of volcanic ac- tion, as above stated, and for giving up in part a brilliant hypothesis, could be misinterpreted, and referred to an un- worthy feeling ; yet this, to my surprise, has been done, and even by Dr. Charles Daubeny, Professor of Chemistry in the University of Oxford. This Gentleman, in defending the hypothesis. which he advocates, and which is precisely my brother’s early hypothesis, comparing Sir H. Davy’s early views with his later, says, ‘ The authority of Sir H. Davy may, I conceive, on this occasion, be fairly pleaded against himself, and the weight of his zpse dixit in the two latter years of his life be viewed as counterbalanced by the contrary judgement he had pronounced, apparently on the same evidence, at an earlier period; neither is it inconsistent with what we know of his character, to suppose that he should have acquired a distaste for the theory in question, when he found it seized upon and illustrated by an humble [humbler] class of in- quirers.’ ” * This I would remark is neither generous nor just, nor even reasonable criticism. It is not generous to assign to unworthy motives, a meritorious act; for so surely may be viewed the relinquishing such an hypothesis by the author of it, when he found it not sufficiently supported by facts. It is not just, be- cause not true, that he merely gave his zpse dixit against his early hypothesis ; in my brother’s observations on volcanos, as I have mentioned, he assigned his reasons for so doing, con- sisting chiefly in want of the positive evidence which he ex- pected to have met with in examining into the phenomena of active volcanos, provided the chemical theory were true. And least of all, is the criticism reasonable: it is almost absurd to suppose that my brother would relinquish his hypothesis be- cause approved of and advocated by others. Dr. Daubeny might as well have fancied that he would have changed his views respecting chlorine, and the metallic bases of the fixed alkalies, as soon as they were seized upon and illustrated by an humbler class of inquirers.” The asperity of the above remarks seems but little warrant- ed by the occasion which has called them forth. Had Dr. Davy been aware of the sentiments I have always expressed relative to his deceased brother, he would have acquitted me of any wish to depreciate his memory, and would have felt that even in the absence of any other mode of ac- counting for this change of opinion, I should have abstained in Reply to Dr. John Davy. 251 from suggesting one which would have seriously disparaged it. But the whole amount of the charge (if charge it can be called) which I had brought against Sir H. Davy, consisted in attributing to him some degree of fickleness or caprice in the abandonment of a preconceived opinion, apparently without sufficient reason. How far the motive suggested for this change of opinion may be consistent with the character of the individual himself, (which is now a matter of history, and not a fit subject for in- discriminate panegyric,) will best be appreciated by those who were most in his intimacy. For my own part, as a warm admirer of his genius, though gathering my impression of his sentiments and disposition from public report; without any recollections from personal acquaintance to correct the impressions thus received, but with every disposition to extenuate the foibles of so great a philosopher ; I shall sincerely rejoice, if the book now pub- lished by his brother, a small part alone of which I have as yet perused, should succeed in its proposed object of elevating the personal reputation of the individual, and thus convince the world that my interpretation of his conduct in this trivial par- ticular has been erroneous. Still, however, Dr. Davy must excuse me, if, from all that has yet appeared, I persist in regarding his brother’s change of opinion in this instance a matter rather of taste than of judgement. In the memoir on volcanos referred to, Sir Humphry di- stinctly admits that his previous theory is fully competent to explain all the phznomena*, although he concludes by assigning a preference to the other explanation as recommend- ed by greater simplicity ; a sentence which, as his biographer Dr. Paris justly observes (Life, p. 247), must be admitted to be rather equivocal. In his Consolations of a Philosopher he is somewhat more explicit, yet even there the only reason he assigns for preferring the theory of central heat is vagueenough, being, as he thinks, ‘more agreeable to the analogies of things.” Having, therefore, looked in vain in either of these records of his sentiments for any attempt to show in what way “ this * “ Assuming the hypothesis of the existence of such alloys of the metals of the earths as may burn into lava in the interior, the whole phenomena may be easily explained from the action of the water of the sea and air on these metals; nor is there any fact, or any of the circumstances which I have mentioned in the preceding part of this paper, which cannot be easily explained, according to that hypothesis.””—Memoir on the Phenomena of Volcanos, by Sir H. Davy, Phil. Trans. 1828. [or Phil. Mag. and Annals, N.S. vol. iy. p. 85—94. Eprr.] 252 Prof. Daubeny on Sir H. Davy’s Theory of Volcanos, simpler hypothesis” will account for the chemical phenomena accompanying volcanic action, and Dr. Davy himself not having supplied this desideratum, I cannot view his adoption of it in any other light at present than as a matter of taste on his part. Dr. Davy, indeed, makes his brother say, though I have not yet lighted upon the passage in which this sentiment occurs, that the chemical theory does not rest on sufficient evidence. This however, although a ground for scepticism as to the truth of the one, would afford no reason for adopting the other ; for granting that of two hypotheses both competent to explain the facts, the simpler one ought to be preferred, no competition surely can exist between them, when this can be predicated only of one. That the chemical theory will enable us to account for the phenomena, has beenshown in the memoir which called forth Dr. Davy’s animadversions, and since more fully elsewhere*, and is admitted, as has been seen, in the fullest manner by Sir Humphry in the very paper to which allusion is made. Neither do I see the force of the negative evidence which Dr. Davy has produced to impugn it, for he is too conversant with volcanic operations to be ignorant that sulphuretted hy- drogen is amongst its commonest products, and is too good a chemist to admit the possibility of substances like potassium or calcium in their unoxidized condition finding their way up- wards in the midst of the steam, which always accompanies volcanic ejections}. What, then, becomes of the objection, that if the hypothesis were correct, inflammable gas might proba- bly be detected issuing from the volcano, or that some pure or uncombined alkaline or earthy inflammable basis might be discovered entangled in the lava, when the former is seen to be actually present, and the latter can so little be expected ? And, whilst the presence of hydrogen, combined as it naturally would be with the sulphur which we know to exist in such situations, furnishes a striking confirmation of Sir Humphry Davy’s original views, neither he, nor any other chemist, has succeeded in accounting for it according to the opposite ones. The same may be said of the sal ammoniac, the nitrogen, and according to the simplest form of the hypothesis as ex~ * Encyclop. Metrop., art. GEoLocy. + This objection, at least, cannot have originated with Sir Humphry, but must be the exclusive property of his brother, for in the memoir re- ferred to we find Sir Humphry distinctly asserting, ‘‘ That the extreme facility of oxidation belonging to these bodies, must prevent them from ever being found in a pure combustible state in the products of volcanic erup- tions. in Reply to Dr. John Davy. 253 pounded by Cordier, even of the water and the muriatic acid, which are noticed by Davy himself as issuing from the vol- cano, whose phenomena he describes. Whatever ground, therefore, may exist for his scepticism on the subject, none certainly has been assigned for his adoption of the rival hypothesis, which, without effecting the object of explaining the facts, is saddled with assumptions equally gratuitous ; the existence of the alkaline and earthy bases in the interior of the earth, being not more unsupported by direct evidence, than that of a central fluid mass; seeing that the increasing temperature detected in descending into the bowels of the earth, may be explained quite as well by chemical processes carried on at the requisite depths, as by the hypothesis of central fluidity. I trust I have now said enough to justify my having stated that Sir Humphry only gave his zpse dixif in support of his new hypothesis, a point which I was at that time more parti- cularly anxious to establish, from a wish to obtain for the theory I had advocated an unprejudiced hearing, and being well aware of the weight which the deliberate judgement of such an authority as that of Sir H. Davy on a question of science would obtain with most readers. Since that time the favourable opinion expressed by the present as well as by the late President of the Geological Society with respect to the chemical theory, will have secured it a candid reception amongst naturalists; whilst the authority of one of the most distinguished of Sir Humphry Davy’s living cotemporaries and rivals in science, Mons. Ampére, will vindicate its claim to respect amongst chemical philosophers.—One more word with respect to the reasonableness of imagining that Davy might choose to abandon his former hypothesis without deli- berate consideration. In the first place, considering the numberless applications of which his great discovery of the alkaline and earthy bases admitted, it is not necessary to suppose that he would regard this one with any peculiar favour. And indeed the only al- lusion I find to it at all in any of his earlier publications con- sists of four lines in a note appended to his Memoir on the Decomposition of the Earths. Secondly, the solid character of the discoveries on which the reputation of Davy was based, would naturally make him indifferent as to the fate of a theory resting on assumptions which, whether probable or not, were such as could themselves neither be substantiated nor set aside by direct experiment. The higher, indeed, we estimate the fame of Sir H. Davy, the less difficult will it appear to us to account for his aban- 254 Prof. Daubeny on Sir H. Davy’s Theory of Volcanos. donment of his original views, and for his preference as a mat- ter of taste for others which were calculated, from their very vagueness, to allow full scope to that imagination, which, as appears from his Consolations of a Philosopher, continued in unimpaired vigour to the last. There is, therefore, no analogy between the motives of his conduct in this case and in the question with respect to the nature of chlorine, in which Sir H. Davy might feel a just pride, as having recalled the scien- tific world from theory to a simple expression of facts, and thus corrected the logic of chemistry, in quite as great a de- gree as he extended our knowledge of this particular class of combinations. It may be readily inferred from these remarks that I regard the chemical theory of volcanos, which it has been my humble endeavour to elucidate and to confirm, chiefly valuable by erecting a standard to which volcanic operations may be com- pared, and thus encouraging more minute attention to the phznomena they present. ‘This the mere vague and general statement of their originating in central heat is not so likely to do, and hence it may perhaps be regretted, if the preference for a simpler hypothesis, or the authority of great names, should so prepossess the minds of men of science as to pre- vent their entertaining the views I have advocated, and to induce them to dismiss the subject as altogether beyond the reach of probable conjecture *. It is on this latter ground chiefly that I have chosen to ad- dress you, for with respect to that part of the subject which concerns myself I should have been content perhaps to leave the question at issue to the candour of the public, and to the impression which most persons will entertain, that I at least can have no desire to attribute unworthy motives to Sir H. Davy. Oxford, Feb. 23, 1836. * In Dr. Thomson’s Outlines of Mineralogy, Geology, and Mineral Ana- lysis just published, I find this sentiment expressed, but the only objections stated to the chemical theory are, Ist, The specific gravity of the earth; Qndly, The nature of the elastic fluids emitted by volcanos. I regret, there- fore, that the learned author, who has done me the honour of quoting and commending the work on volcanos I published in 1826, had not zlso con- sulted the article on Geology in the Encyclop. Metrop., to which I contri- buted the portion relating to volcanos, as he would have there seen the first objection fully, and I hope fairly, treated, and the latter shown to be quite in aceordance with the theory. The low specific gravity of the metals of the alkalies appears to operate against the reception of the theory in the minds of many; yet if it can be shown that the bases of those volcanic products which appear upon the surface have collectively a greater specific gravity than the mass resulting from their union with oxygen, I cannot see wherein the force of this objec- tion resides. [ 255 ] LI. Proceedings of Learned Societies. LINNZAN SOCIETY. Jan. 19, J EAD, Descriptions of the species of Lacis found grow- 1836. ing in the River Essequibo, and of the fish called Pacou, which feeds upon these plants. By Robert H. Schomburgh. Feb. 2.—Read, Observations upon a supposed new species of Vero- nica found in Staffordshire, in a letter to Mr. Sowerby ; by Mr. George Luxford. Also, descriptions of two species of the genus Pinus from the Hi- malaya Alps. By Professor Don, Libr. L.S. The first of these, which belongs to the group of spruce firs, has been described and figured by Dr. Wallich, in the 3rd volume of his splendid work on Indian plants, under the name of Pinus Smithiana, in honour of the late eminent President of the Linnean Society. It is nearly related to Pinus orientalis, a native of Armenia and the western parts of Georgia, and has been cultivated for more than ten years in our gardens, and was at first supposed to belong to the Indian cedar (Pinus Deodara). Khutrow, Morinda, and Raga, are the names by which it is known in its native mountains. The second species belongs to the group of silver firs, and is nearly allied to Pinus Webbiana, but is essentially distinguished from it by its longer acutely bidentate leaves, of nearly the same colour on both surfaces, by its shorter and thicker cones, with trapeziform scales, and rounded notched bracteole. Dr. Wallich, who had neither seen flowers nor fruit, has doubtfully referred it to Taxus, under the spe- cific name of Lambertiana, in his Catalogue. Several travellers have noticed the tree, but Mr. Royle appears to be the only one who has been fortunate enough to meet with it in flower and fruit. The author has noticed a remarkable peculiarity in the seeds of the species belonging to this group, which consists in the rupture or se- paration at the inner side of the external integument, leaving the nucleus with its inner covering exposed at that part. The following are the characters of these two species : Sp. 1. Pinus Smirutana. Wail. P. foliis solitariis compresso-tetragonis rectis subulatis pungentibus, strobilis oblongis cylindraceis: squamis obovato-rotundatis coriaceis rigidis mar- gine levissimis, antherarum cristé subrotunda erosé crenulata. Sp. 2. Pinus Pinprow. Loyle MSS. P. foliis bifariam versis linearibus planis utrinque concoloribus apice biden- tatis, antherarum cristé bicorniculata, strobilis ovalibus: squamis trape- zoideo-cordatis, bracteolis subrotundis emarginatis erosé crenulatis. Feb. 16.—Read some observations on the Nephrodium rigidum. By Professor Don, Libr.L.S. For this valuable addition to the British Filices, we are indebted to the Rev. W. T. Bree, who discovered it many years ago on Inglebo- rough, and it has since been published in the Supplement to English Botany. The British specimens accord entirely with foreign ones, and with the accurate figure given by Schkuhr (Kryptog. Gew. t. 38.). 256 Proceedings of Learned Societies. The author has proposed the following character of the species : N. rigidum, fronde lanceolata bipinnata : pinnulis oblongis pinnatifidis: la- ciniis arguté dentato-serratis: venulis inconspicuis, soris biseriatim contiguis, indusio scarioso dilatato, stipite rhachique densé paleaceis. The species ranks next to dilatatum and spinulosum, but differs from both by its larger and more crowded sori, broader and more de- pressed indusium, and by the stipes and rhachis being copiously clothed with narrow ramentaceous scales as in Aspidium aculeatum. The more delicate*fronds, with pinnatifid pinnule, having the lobes serrated with sharp-pointed, incurved teeth, essentially distinguish it from Nephro- dium Filix Mas, between which and spinulosum it appears to be inter- mediate in its habit and characters. Read also remarks on some varieties of Erica ciliaris and Tetraliz. By Professor Don, Libr. L.S. The extreme states of these two species are easily recognised at first sight; but it must be admitted that varieties do occur in which the characters of both appear blended. The normal form of ciliaris is characterized by its flat, ovate, ternary leaves, elongated axis of its inflorescence, oblong and slightly curved corollas, and naked anthers ; and that of Tetralx by its quaternary, linear leaves, revolute at the edges, capitate inflorescence, globular corollas, and aristate anthers. Some of the varieties of ciliaris exhibited to the meeting, for which the author was indebted to Mr. Hewett C. Watson, had the axis of their inflorescence quite as much depressed as in Tetralizx, along with the narrow quaternary leaves of that species. Another specimen, clearly referrible to Tetralix, had the corolla nearly as long as in cilz- aris. Another variety of Tetralix, lately discovered in Ireland, and which by some botanists is regarded as constituting a distinct spe- cies, has entirely the habit of ciliaris, but with the depressed inflo- rescence, globular corollas and aristate anthers, of the former species ; and it differs from both in the entire absence of the short pubescence from the upper surface of the leaves. The only permanent mark by which ciliaris and Tetralix can be separated is by the absence or presence of the awn-like appendages at the base of the anthers. A comparison of Irish specimens of Gypsocallis mediterranea with others containedin the Smithian Herbarium, shows that they agree in every essential point; and although the two plants when grown to- gether in a garden exhibit a somewhat different aspect, there cannot remain any doubtas to their identity. G.carnea is readily distinguished by the much greater length of its anthers and ovarium. GIBRALTAR SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY.—NEW OBSERVATORY AT CATANIA. It is truly gratifying to see that activity in scientific pursuits is fast spreading from Britain to her colonies. The institution at Quebec has already distinguished itself by the publication of some able papers on American geology, topography, and statistics ; and we now find that a new society has started up at Gibraltar, which, we trust, may prove Intelligence and Miscellaneous Articles. 257 as stable as the Rock itself, for the gradual changes in the members of so respectable a garrison are ever likely to renew its spirit. We are alluding to “ The Gibraltar Scientific Society,” of which Dr. Bur- row, D.D., F.R.S., is the worthy president ; and we hope soon to learn the names of the Council. One of that body, Captain W. H, Shirreff, R.N., and a Fellow of the Royal Astronomical Society of London, possesses a well-situated observatory, mounted with excellent instruments, in the use of which he has long been expert. This gen- tleman introduced two young officers of great merit to the December meeting, Lieut. Graves and Lieut. Stanley, of the Navy, on which occa- sion they were elected honorary members, as a mark of consideration for their hydrographical labours in the Archipelago. We look forward to the proceedings of this promising association with much interest. The respected correspondent to whom we are indebted for the foregoing notice adds the following : “From a letter from Sig. Cacciatore, of Palermo, I find that the University of Catania are about to build and equip an Observatory, partly at their own expense, and partly at that of the King of Naples. I have been applied to respecting instruments, &c.” LII. Intelligence and Miscellaneous Articles. ON NITRO-BENZIDE AND SULPHO-BENZIDE. BY E. MITSCHER- LICH. Nitro-ben- HEN hot and fuming nitric acid is gradually zide.— added to benzine, action ensues, accompanied with the evolution of heat; and a peculiar substance is formed, which remains dissolved in the hot nitric acid; but when cooled it partly separates, and floats on the surface. If the acid is then diluted with water, this product falls to the bottom of the vessel. By washing, and then distilling this substance, it may be obtained perfectly pure, as a yellowish liquid, possessing a very sweet taste and peculiar odour, somewhat between that of the volatile oil of almonds and oil of cinnamon. Its specific gravity is 1-209 at 59° Fahr., it boils at 415-4° Fahr., and distills unchanged. At $7-4° Fahr. it solidifies, affording acicular crystals. This substance may be distilled unchanged with nitric acid. Di- luted sulphuric acid does not act on it ; but when the concentrated acid is boiled with it, it is decomposed, with the disengagement of sulphurous acid gas, and the solution becomes highly coloured. When heated with potassium, it detonates so violently as to break the ves- sel. It is almost insoluble in water ; neither ether nor alcohol act onit. The strong acids, such as the nitric and sulphuric, readily dissolve it, better at a high than alow temperature. [t is composed of 12 volumes of the vapour of carbon, — 10 hydrogen, 2 azote, 4 . oxygen. Third Series. Vol. 8. No. 45. March 1836. 2D 258 Intelligence and Miscellaneous Articles. The specific gravity of the vapour is about 4:4, 1 volume of nitro-benzide is composed of 3 volumes carbon, 23 hydrogen, 4 azote, 1 oxygen. The formation of nitro-benzide may be explained by supposing that a volume of nitric acid gas combines with a volume of benzine, whilst there separates } vol. of hydrogen and 4 vol. of oxygen. Sulpho-benzide.—if benzine is mixed with anhydrous sulphuric acid it is not decomposed, nor is any sulphurous acid gas liberated; but a thick liquid, very soluble in water, is obtained, which, when diluted with water, affords a crystalline substance equal to about five or six parts for every 100 of benzine employed. This substance is very slightly soluble in water, and may be purified by washing with water. To completely purify it, it may be dissolved in zther, filtered, the solution crystallized, and the crystals distilled. At 212° Fahr. this substance melts, forming a transparent and colour- less liquid, and boils at a temperature between the boiling-points of sulphur and mercury. It is inodorous, insoluble in the alkalies ; but soluble in the acids, where it separates the water. Heated with sulphuric acid, it forms a particular acid, which forms a soluble com- bination with barytes. The other acids do not alter it. It is composed of 12 carbon, 10 hydrogen, 1 sulphur, 2 oxygen. It thus appears that nitro- and sulpho-benzide are formed by the union of nitric acid and sulphuric acid with benzine, and that during this combination water is separated. It is owing to this circumstance that the union of these substances is so stable as to resist the ordi- nary methods of separating the acids. M. Mitscherlich, from the analogy of these bodies with the amides, has proposed to call them nitro- and sulpho-benzide.— Journal de Pharmacie, Juin 1835. FORMATION OF ZTHER. BY M. MITSCHERLICH. The decomposition of alcohol into ether and water is not inter- esting merely by, the production of ether, but is especially so as an example of a particular kind of decomposition, which cannot be so well followed with any other substance, and which is manifested in the formation of some important products, for example, in that of al- cohol itself. M. Mitscherlich has endeavoured to elucidate the phenomena of this decomposition by the following experiments : Take a mixture of 100 parts of sulphuric acid, 20 of water, and 50 of anhydrous alcohol, and heat it gradually until its boiling-point becomes 284° Fahrenheit. Alcohol is then allowed to fall gradually into the vessel which contains the mixture, and the current is to be so regulated that the heat of the mixture remains constantly at 284°. If, for example, the operation be conducted with a mixture of six ounces of sulphuric acid, one ounce and one fifth of water, and three Intelligence and Miscellaneous Articles. 259 of alcohol, and if the density of each two ounces of preduct as it is obtained be taken, it will be observed that this density passes gra- dually from 0-780 to 0-788 and 0°798, and afterwards remains con- stantly at the last-mentioned density, which is exactly that of the alcohol employed. If the operation be properly conducted, an unlimited quantity of alcohol may be converted into ether, provided that the sulphuric acid does not change. ‘The distilled liquor is formed of two distinct fluids ; the upper one is ether, containing a little water and alcohol ; the lower one is water, with a little alcohol and ether, Its weight is nearly equal to that of the alcohol employed, and it is composed of SEEDED ais oo dates 65 Alcohol). |5 plex. 442 18 Water 4,240.45 scr. 17—100 If into six ounces of concentrated sulphuric acid six ounces of pure alcohol are suffered to flow gradually, a product of constant density is not obtained until the sulphuric acid has taken its pro- portion of water. Take, on the contrary, three ounces of sulphuric acid and two ounces of water, and let alcohol be added, drop by drop ; the first two ounces distilled are merely spirit, if wine of specific gravity 0-926, containing scarcely a trace of ether. The density decreases until the quantity of water of the sulphuric acid is re- duced to its proportion, and the product of the distillation has ac- quired the density of the alcohol. If concentrated sulphuric acid be added to anhydrous alcohol in excess, pure alcohol distils at first; but when the temperature reaches nearly 260°, the first traces of ether begin to appear; the production of ether is at its maximum between 284° and 302°. It results, from the preceding observations, that alcohol, when in contact with sulphuric acid, is converted into zther and water at a temperature of about 284°. A great number of analogous deconi- positions and combinations are known, which may be attributed en- tirely to the influence of the contact of bodies. The most remark- able example of this kind is that of the conversion of oxygenated water into water and oxygen, by the slightest trace of the peroxide of manganese and some other substances. The decomposition of sugar into alcohol and carbonic acid, the oxidizement of alcohol when it is changed into vinegar, are phenomena of the same kind ; and so also is the conversion of starch and sugar by means of sulphuric acid. M. Mitscherlich, observing that in the preparation of carburetted hydrogen by means of sulphuric acid and alcohol water is formed at the same time, attributes this decomposition of alcohol to the influence of mere contact, and not to the affinity of sulphuric acid for water.—Journal de Pharmacie, Juin 1835. ON THE SEPARATION OF BARYTES AND STRONTIA.—BY MR. J. D. SMITH. The great analogy existing between the salts of barytes and strontia, may render an observation on the difference of solubility in water of 2D2 260 Intelligence and Miscellaneous Articles. their chromates worthy of notice ; and the more so, as it adds one to the few methods already devised for the analysis of substances containing both these earths. I had remarked some time before, that when a solution of neutral chromate of potash was added to one of muriate of strontia considerably diluted, no precipitation took place until the mixed solutions were boiled, and. even then that a large quantity of strontia was still held in solution; whilst, on the other hand, the action of the neutral chromate of potash on a solution of muriate of barytes was widely different ; for let the solution of barytes be ever so largely diluted, yet chromate of potash invariably produced precipitation ; so much so that wherever a sulphate was capable of detecting this earth, chromate of potash also indicated its presence. Wishing to examine some minerals supposed to contain both strontia and barytes, it occurred to.me that the property possessed by a dilu- ted solution of muriate of strontia of not precipitating with chromate of potash, might be made available for analytical purposes. I there- fore made a few experiments to ascertain the fitness of this salt as an agent for separating the salts of these earths when dissolved in a large quantity of water. These experiments at first did not afford very exact results; for the precipi:ated chromate always appeared to in- dicate rather more barytes than was originally taken: but tnis was found to be owing to the chromate, like the sulphate of barytes, re- quiring ignition before weighing, to expel a little water which obsti- nately adheres to it when dried at low temperatures ; this error was entirely obviated by heating the chromate to redness previous to weighing it. The cause of the error being thus ascertained, 20 grs. of carbonate of strontia and 5 grs. of carbonate of barytes were dissolved in dilute muriatic acid ; the solution wascarefully evaporated to dryness to expel the excess of acid; the dry sait was redissolved in distilled water, and the solution diluted to a pint and a half ; to this was added a dilute solution of chromate of potash, made with transparent crystals, in order to prevent the otherwise possible admixture of sulphate or carbonate. After standing for a short time it was filtered, and the chromate of barytes washed, dried, and ignited; weight 6°53 grs.= 5 grs. of carbonate. The solution and washings were then evapora- ted to reduce the liquor to a smaller compass, and a solution of sesquicarbonate of ammonia added, which precipitated carbonate of strontia ; this when collected and dried weighed 19°19 grs. Another experiment, in which the quantity of barytes exceeded that of the strontia, was conducted in a similar manner, with the exception of the employment of less water (2 pint) to dissolve the dry salt be- fore the addition of the chromate of potash. In this case there were obtained from 12 grs. of carbonate of barytes, and 8 grs. of car- bonate of strontia, 15-8 grs. of chromate = 12°09 grs. of carbonate of barytes, and 7°26 grs. of carbonate of strontia. In both the above experiments it will be remarked that there is less carbonate of strontia obtained than was originally taken: thisis owing to strontia not being entirely precipitated by a solution of sesquicar- bonate of ammonia ; for when this salt and muriate of strontia are Intelligence and Miscellaneous Articles. 261 mixed, the former being in excess, the filtered liquor will become slightly turbid on the addition of oxalate of ammonia, and stirring the solution. In the following experiment, in which 10 grs. of each carbonate were taken, and oxalate substituted for sesquicarbonate of ammonia, the results were chromate of barytes 13-04 grs. = 10 grs. of carbonate, and 11-9 grs. of oxalate = 10 grs. of carbonate of strontia ; thus showing the superiority of oxalate of ammonia as a precipitant for strontia : the only precaution necessary is to have the solution neutral. Note. Pyroxylic spirit produces a more intense crimson flame witha small quantity of muriate of strontia than alcohol does, and conse- quently is of greater service as a test for recognising strontia when occurring in minute quantity. f St. Thomas's Hospital, Feb. 1836. COMPOSITION OF CARBONATE OF ZINC.—BY MR. J. D. SMITH. When solutions of sesquicarbonate of ammonia and sulphate of zinc are mixed, a white, bulky, and gelatinous precipitate is produced ; this after repeated washings with hot water, by which carbonic acid gas is plentifully evolved, falls as a white powder. 80 grs. of this powder lost by ignition 22-5 grs., and 81) grs. dissolved in a counter- poised bottle of dilute sulphuric acid, lost 12°5 grs. of carbonic acid. From these experiments it appears that 80 grs. of this powder are composed of 57°5 grs. oxide of zinc, 12°5 gts. of carbonic acid, and 10 grs. of water ; which numbers indicate a compound of 24 eqs. of oxide of zinc, 2 eqs. of water, and | eq. of carbonic acid ; which may be viewed either as a 2 carbonate of zinc with 4 eqs. of water, or as 1 eq. of hydrated subsesquicarbonate of zinc united to | eq. of hy- drate of zinc. Its equivalent number being in former case 280, in the latter 140, or 24 eqs. of oxide of zinc 100 1 eq. of carbonic acid 22 2 eqs. of water...... 1S—140. St. Thomas's Hospital, Feb, 1836. ON RIOLITE, A SUPPOSED BISELENIURET OF ZINC, AND HER- RERITE, SUPPOSED TO BE CARBONATE OF TELLURIUM.—BY PROFESSOR DEL RIO. An account is given by Mr. Del Rio, in vol. iv. of the Phil. Mag. and Ann., p. 113, of two new minerals found in Mexico ; one supposed to be biseleniuret of zinc and sulphuret of mercury, which in honour of Mr. Del Rio I have named Riolite ; the other, considered a bisele- niuret of zinc and bisulphuret of mercury, | have named Culebrite, from the place in which it occurs. By the last mail I have received the following letter from Mr. Del Rio relative to the first of these substances, and to another mineral, supposed to be carbonate of tellurium, which I shall be obliged to the 262° Intelligence and Miscellaneous Articles. editors of the Phil. Mag. and Journal of Science to insert in that journal. Feb. 18, 1836. H. J. Brooke. “* Dear Sir, “ Mexico, November 14, 1835. « uopuo'y “qwUO *yurod-maq *uley *pulm “Id OWIOULIIY T, *1a}9WIOIv go shuq, *uopsog JD TIVIA “Mp 49 pun SuopuorT avau ‘youmsiyy yo Ajaroog pounqgnaysozy 241 fo uapivy) 247 Iv NOSdHOH,L, “yy hq { hunjasoay quojsisspy ayy hig Ayarog pohoy ay} fo szuaupandp ay} yo apous suornasasgg yoorFojo1oajayyr THE LONDON ann EDINBURGH PHILOSOPHICAL MAGAZINE AND JOURNAL OF SCIENCE. [THIRD SERIES.] APRIL 1836. LIII. Cbservations upon the Habits of the Plecotus auritus, or Long-eared Bat. By J. pr C. Sowersy, Esq., F.L.S.* Axsour the beginning of August last, a living specimen of the Long-eared Bat was given to my children, We constructed a cage for him by covering a box with gauze and making a round hole in the side fitted with a phial cork. When he was awake we fed him with flies introduced through this hole, and thus kept him for several weeks. The animal soon became familiar, and immediately a fly was presented alive at the hole he would run or fly from any part of the cage and seize it in our fingers, but a dead or quiet fly he never would touch, At other times dozens of flies and grass- hoppers have been left in his cage, and waking him by their noise, he dexterously caught them as they hopped or flew about, but uniformly disregarded them while they were at rest. ‘The common Blatta, hard Beetles, and Caterpillar he refused, even after he had been induced by their moving to attack them. As we became still more familiar our new friend was invited to join in our evening amusements, to which he contributed his. full share by flitting round the room, at times settling upon our persons and permitting us to handle and caress him. He announced his being awake by a shrill chirp, * Read at the first Philosophical Meeting of the Camden Literary and Scientific Institution, January 26, 1836: and now communicated by the Author. Third Series. Vol. 8. No. 47. April 1836, 2E 266 Mr. Sowerby on the Habits of the Long-eared Bat. which was much more acute than that of the Cricket. Now was the proper time for feeding him. I before stated that he only took his food alive: it was also observed that not only was motion necessary, but that generally some noise on the part of the fly was required to induce him to accept it; and this fact was soon discovered by the children, who were en- tertained by his taking flies from their fingers as he flew by them, before he was bold enough to settle upon their hands to devour his victims. ‘They quickly improved upon their discovery, and by imitating the booming of a bee, induced the bat, deceived by the sound, to settle upon their faces, wrapping his wings round their lips and searching for the ex- pected fly. We observed that if he took a fly while on the wing, he frequently settled to masticate it; and when he had been flying about a long time he would rest upon a curtain, pricking his ears and turning his head in all directions, when if a fly were made to buzz, or the sound imitated, he would proceed directly to the spot, even on the opposite side of the room, guided, it should appear, entirely by the ear. Sometimes he took his victim in his mouth, even though it was not flying; at other times he inclosed it in his wings, with which he formed a kind of bag-net; this was his general plan when in his cage, or when the fly was held in our fingers or between our lips. From these observations I should conclude that many of the movements of the Bat upon the wing are directed by his exquisite sense of hearing. May not the sensibility of this organ be naturally greater in those animals whose organs of vision are too susceptible to bear daylight, when those organs, from their nature, would necessarily be of most service? such as the cat, who hunts much by the ear, and the mole, who feeding in the dark recesses of his subterranean abode is very sensible of the approach of danger and expert in avoiding it. In the latter case large external ears are not required, because sound is well conveyed by solids and along narrow cavities. In the cases of many bats and of owls the external ears are remarkably developed. Cats combine a quickness of sight with acute hearing; they hunt by the ear, but they follow their prey by the eye. Some bats are said to feed upon fruits; have they the same delicacy of hearing, feeling, &c. as others ?. [ 267 ]} LIV. Observations on the frequent Presence of Lead in En- glish Chemical Preparations ; on the Cause of that Pre- sence; and other Remarks relative thereto. By Gustavus ScHWEITZER*. THE examination of the purity of chemical preparations, in which I have been engaged for some time, convinces me that many of them are impure and contain lead. In se- veral which I have examined I have found subcarbonate of magnesia containing lead in the proportion of 2°40 grains subcarbonate of lead in 1000 grains of subcarbonate of mag- nesia. Bicarbonate of potash contained a similar proportion ; bicarbonate of soda, subcarbonate of ammonia, &c. showed the same impurity. It is clear, when these substances, so universally used, contain lead, that many other combinations which are prepared from them must be equally impure. The cause of this impurity arises greatly from the manner in which these substances are prepared. Leaden vessels are too often used for the crystallization and precipitation of them, and how easily alkaline substances act on lead is too well known to need comment. But another cause of this impurity, although the portion present is but very small, is the white glass used in this country, which must be an object of great consequence to practical chemists and druggists. I know not whether any direct experiments have been made to show what influence alkalies, acids, and salts may have on white glass. I have therefore endeavoured to ascertain this point by the following experiments. White glass bottles, such as are used for medi- cine, were taken and filled, some with distilled water and others with common water. No lead was imparted to the water in either case, even after immersion in it for a few weeks exposed to a common temperature; but when the di- stilled water was impregnated with carbonic acid gas, after a few days the fluid gave, with the proper tests, ample proof of the existence of lead; and when boiled to expel the gas, no indication of lead was obtained, proving that a bicarbonate of lead was formed by the action of the carbonic acid gas on the lass. Acetic acid, nitric acid, muriatic acid also take up an from white glass. Diluted sulphuric acid, after standing some time in these glasses, shows no indication of dissolved lead, but after pouring off the acid and rinsing the bottle with nitric acid the presence of lead was detected. Neutral salts showed an equal action when they contained such acids as produce with oxide of lead insoluble combinations, or com- * Communicated by the Author. 2E2 268 Mr. Schweitzer on the Cause of the frequent Presence of binations of very sparing solubility, and produced more or less a film on the glass, which film was dissolved by nitric acid;—as the phosphates, oxalates, chromates, sulphates. Chloride of lead is but slightly soluble in pure water, and according to my analysis 100 parts of distilled water will dis- solve 0°74 part of chloride of lead. Solutions of chlorides will also dissolve chloride of lead, more or less, according to their strength, but still less than distilled water, because when to a concentrated solution of chloride of lead in distilled water a few drops of chloride of calcium of 0°2 strength are added, the greater part of the chloride of lead will be sepa- rated, but by chloride of calcium in excess the chloride of lead will be retaken up. (Bischof, Neues Jahresh. d. Chemie und Physick.) This 1 found to occur with the chlorides of am- monium, iron, lithium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, and zinc, and most likely will be proved to be the case with all chlorides of a corresponding strength. Therefore chloride of lead will be imparted to a solution of a chloride when kept in white glass bottles according to the strength of the solution of the chloride; the more chloride the solution may contain the less will be taken up of the chloride of lead. The chlorides will take up by boiling a considerable quantity of chloride of lead, a portion of which will crystallize when the fluid is cooled down. Caustic alkalies act very powerfully on white glass, and much oxide of lead will be dissolved. Caustic ammonia acts very slightly on the glass; subcarbonate of potash, soda, and ammonia also take up lead, but considerably less than the caustic alkalies. A strong solution of ‘the subcarbonates will take up less than a diluted one. Volatile oils show no action on the glass. ‘These experiments prove that the white glass bottles commonly used are not fit for chemical and medical purposes; which fact is worthy of the attention of the Medical Board. The great addition of oxide of lead in the manufac- ture of glass to make it more fusible must be avoided. Accord- ing to the analysis of Faraday, the ordinary flint glass contains 33°28 per cent. of oxide of lead, whereas for all chemical or medical purposes a glass free from lead should be used. A piece of lead perfectly clean and bright on the surface was kept in distilled water in a closed vessel, and after some time showed a white crystalline coating of subcarbonate of lead; the fluid was also filled with little crystalline scales. The fluid turned red litmus-paper blue, and tests indicated freely the presence of lead in the fluid; but when it ‘was care- fully filtered through paper which had been freed by weak nitric acid from its impurity, no indication of lead whatever Lead in English Chemical Preparations. ‘269 was perceived, showing that the carbonate of lead was merely dispersed in the water and not dissolved. A similar effect was shown by oxide of lead treated with pure water, but no solution of it was perceptible if it was kept with the water, whether in an open or a closed vessel 3—a fact which is op- posed to the received opinions*. Well-water and mineral water corrode lead, forming a coating of oxide of lead on the metal without taking up a particle of the oxide; but mineral waters strongly impregnated with carbonic acid gas I found to ‘contain faint traces of lead, when they had been for some time in contact with it. Mr. Walker according to his analysis found in the mineral water of Bath, lead originating from the pipes or pump used for the conveying of the water. (Quarterly Journal of Science, Literature, and Art, January to March, 1829.) Might not the lead in these instances be dispersed mechanically in the water? The result of my experiments induces me to believe so. Volatile oil dissolves lead freely. Alcoboland gether, when pure, do not act on that metal. When an alkaline fluid contains a trace of lead, the best test to apply is the hydrosulphuret of ammonia, as this reagent will detect s00.000 gt: of crystallized acetate of lead; but this is almost the limit of its dilution, as the observation must be made by the light falling upon the surface of the liquid, which must have a diameter of not much less than one inch. In a neutral fluid, or in one which is only slightly acid, the presence of lead may be shown by the appli- cation of sulphuretied hydrogen gas; but it is advisable to avoid the use of nitric acid, as by a little surplus of it faint traces of lead will be easily overlooked. Acetic acid is preferable be- cause its surplus does not affect the delicacy of the hydrosulphu- retted gas. Very good tests also are soluble sulphates and chro- mates, particularly to decide on the nature of the metal, al- though not to such an extent as the tests before mentioned, Chromate of potash will indicate traces of lead, when sulphate of soda ceases to do so. Sulphate of lead will be partly dis- solved by concentrated nitric acid ; muriatic acid shows traces of lead; acetic acid only faintly shows them. Chromate of lead when treated with strong sulphuric acid will be changed into sulphate of lead, and the decanted acid will contain no lead. Nitric acid dissolves traces of lead from the chromate; muriatic acid changes the chromate of lead into chloride of lead and the chromic acid into oxide of chrome by develop- ing chlorine, particularly by the application of heat. Acetic * Handbuch der theoretischen Chemie von Leopold Gmelin, 1 Band, 2 Abth. P. 1073. [See on this subject Capt. Yorke’s paper in Lond. and Edinb. bil. Mag., vol. v. p. 81.—Kprr.] 270 Mr. Tovey’s further Researches in the acid acted on chromate of lead and took up some lead, parti- cularly when the acid was for several days in contact with it: according to Mans, (Poggendorff’s Annalen, band ix. p. 127.) it is not soluble in acetic acid. Royal German Spa, Brighton, Gustavus SCHWEITZER. November 29, 1835. LV. Further Researches in the Undulatory Theory of Light. By Joun Tovey, Esq. To the Editors of the Philosophical Magazine and Journal. GENTLEMEN, oy that my paper on the relation between the length and velocity of a wave of light, inserted in your Number for January last, has received, in your Number for February, a favourable notice from your eminently scientific correspondent Professor Powell, I venture to send you a con- tinuation of my researches. My object now is to transform the general equations (3.) of that paper, into others adapted to any case of undulation in which the directions of the coordinates can be so taken that the displacements §, , , may be regarded as functions of z and ¢. On the condition just stated, we have, by Taylor’s formula, aye Me Ax Be Az® diz Axt Pi eet gas Bh) Gee hiae Vida ene ek) d*y Ax* O° 4 ee. ig ee BS ae date oo. Get hes cl aetna dé GO DOG? Ot a A ee cake Tek Tiga tt ag ga ges tng rel ara + &e. + &c. + &c. Now, suppose the arrangement of the molecules in the state of equilibrium to be such that for every molecule on one side of m, within the sphere of its influence, there is another at an equal distance on the opposite side; then, if we substitute these expressions for A£, Ay, AZ, in the first of the equa- tions (3.), the sums =. ¢(7) Az, 2.¢(r) Aa’, TE. (r) A 2, Sais) Avy Z.v(nAyAx, z.v(r)AyAdc*, =. (r) AzAa’, E.(r) Az Azt, &c., in which the degrees of the products of the variations are odd, will vanish ; be- Cause, whatever be the signs of Aw, Ay, Az for any molecule, these signs will all be changed for the corresponding mole- Undulatory Theory of Light. 271 cule on the opposite side of m; consequently the signs of the odd products of the variations will be changed, while the ab- solute values of the variations and of their products remain the same for both molecules. This supposition respecting the arrangement of the molecules is due to M. Cauchy, and ap- pears very probable; because it seems impossible to conceive how the equilibrium could subsist unless it were true. It is also probable that the sphere of the influence of each mole- cule comprehends a great number of other molecules; and accordingly we shall assume this as an hypothesis. Now, as we cannot suppose the molecules, in their state of equilibrium, to be more crowded in one part of the sphere than another, it follows that the terms of the other sums =. (r) Ay A 2’, V(r) AyAxr, =.y (7) AZAz, =. (7) Az Az’, &c., in which there are odd powers of the variations, will be about half of them positive and half negative, and will nearly destroy each other, and consequently these sums will nearly vanish. Neglecting them as well as the former, the first of the equa- tions (3.) becomes, by the substitution, ae Age ae Tea me{ (He) +9008). (Fae +58 Ae 4 ke) | The second and third of the equations (3.) are of the same form as the first; consequently, if we transform them in the same manner, and, for the sake of abridgement, put > =. (¢ (7) + b(r) Az*) Ax? = 3? m™ f " : aage (or) + ¥ (7) Aw’) Act = &e. &e. F=-(¢ (r) + W(r) Ay’) Aa? = s? (1.) mE. (O(r) +H (r) Ay?) Artes 5) 2.3.4 &e. &ce. m a = .(¢ (7) + P(r) Az’) Aa? = a bee or Z.(o(r) + ¥(r7) Ar) Aat= af" &ec. &e. we shall have 272 Mr. Hopkins’s Abstract of his Memoir on PhysicalG eology. d?é ACTS aE is d'é , de satin gee “agit &e ’ d?y d?y d‘ ae Hs ae + Phy + Be. (2.) Se RE 94 hat tha de el dia? + Sy dx + &e. These equations show that the displacements in the three rectangular’ directions are, to the extent to which we have carried the approximation, independent of each other. We have supposed the masses of the molecules to be all equal; but if the medium be composed of two fluids uniformly mixed, and if the masses of the molecules of one fluid be all equal to m, and of the other all equal to m', the equations (2.), which we have just obtained, will still be of the same form ; because each of the sums = may then be divided into two parts, one of which parts, multiplied by m, will embrace the molecules of one of the fluids, while the other part mul- ‘ tiplied by m/, will comprehend the molecules of the other fluid ; and the molecules of each fluid may be conceived to be arranged in the manner which we have supposed. In this way the equations may be extended to the case of any compound medium in which the elementary media are uniformly mingled. In another communication I propose to deduce the inte-:. grals of the equations (2.), and point out the extent of their application. I am, Gentlemen, yours, &c. Evesham, Feb. 9, 1836. Joun Tovey. P.S. There are three typographical errors in my last paper. At page 9, line 12, for z read Az; page 10, line 3, for dz 12 read A 24; and line 22, same page, for s” read ee LVI. An Abstract of a Memoir on Physical Geology ; with a further Exposition of certain Points connected with the Subject. By W. Horxins, Esq., M.A., F.G.S., of St. Peter’s College, Cambridge. [Continued from p. 236.] LE HAVING now reduced the determination of the hori- zontal directions of the fissures produced in the ele- vated mass to that of the fissure which would be produced in a plane lamina every point of which is subjected to known tensions, we may proceed with this latter problem. Our first. object is to determine the direction in which the tensions have Mr. Hopkins’s Abstract of his Memoir on Physical Geology. 273 the greatest tendency to cause a fissure to begin at any proposed point. ‘To give all requisite generality to the investigation, let us suppose there to be any number of these tensions, and let F, f,,,f:, &c. denote their respective intensities at any pro- posed point, 8,, 8, &c. the angles which their directions make with that of F; b= A, hog = = es ze cos2B = p, cos 26, + p.cos2 6, +, &c. v the angle which the required direction makes with that of F; we shall have for the determination of ¥, 1+ pcos 26 ' =psin 2 B This equation will determine the direction in which the ten- sions have the greatest tendency to cause a fissure to begin at any assigned point, but when its formation has begun, it is ob- vious that the state of tension in its immediate vicinity must be altered, and that the tensions thus modified may not have a tendency to continue the fissure in the same direction as that in which it was the tendency of the original tensions to make it begin. I have shown, however, that with our hypothesis as to the mode of action of the elevatory force (see p. 234) the above equation will be very approximately applicable to the action of these modified as well as to that of the original ten- sions. The actual direction in which the fissure will be formed will not in all cases depend solely upon this tendency of the tensions, but partly also on the constitution of the elevated mass. If, however, its cohesive power be perfectly uniform, it is manifest that this direction will be determined by the ten- sions alone, or will coincide with that given by the above equation. It will appear also that this is equally true in cer- tain other cases; when it is not so, the effect of any peculiar constitution of the elevated mass must be investigated. I shall now proceed with these points. Let us still confine our attention to a simple lamina of uni- form thickness. Its cohesive power at any proposed point may be estimated in exactly the same manner as the intensity of the tension at that point. Let the point of the lamina be designated by P, and draw through it, in any direction in the plane of the lamina, a straight line whose length is unity. Then conceive two equal and opposite forces (f/f) acting cot?» + cot P—1 = 0.* * See Memoir, p. 18. + Memoir, pp. 20, 21. t Memoir, p. 13. Third Series. Vol. 8. No. 47. April 1836. 2F 274 Mr. Hopkins’s Abstract of his Memoir on Physical Geology. uniformly along this line perpendicular to it, and in the plane of the lamina, on the contiguous particles situated respec- tively on opposite sides of the line, thus tending to form a fissure along it. The cohesive power opposes this tendency, and if it be uniform along the line just mentioned it will be measured by that value of f which is just sufficient to over- come it. Ifthe cohesive power along this line be variable, f will manifestly not be a measure of it with reference to the single point P. In such case we must conceive the cohesive power to be equal (for the unit of length) at every point of the line to that at P, and then that value of (which we may designate by 11) which would, under such circumstances, just overcome the cohesive power, may be taken as a measure of it at the point P, when estimated in the direction perpendicu- lar to the above line through that point. In the first place let us suppose the value of II the same for every direction of this line; then is it manifest that the direc- tion in which a fissure may be formed immediately at the point P cannot be determined in any degree by the cohesive power, since its value is the same for every direction through P. The same conclusion will clearly apply to every point where the value of II is independent of angular direction, and equally so whether 17 be the same or different for different points, 7.e. whether the cohesive power be uniform or vari- able, so long as its variation depends solely on the position of . the point P; or, in mathematical Janguage, the above con- clusion will hold whenever I is a function only of the co- ordinates of P. In such case then, the fissure will be formed through P in that direction in which the tensions there have the greatest tendency to form it, and our equation will be as strictly applicable for the determination of this direction as if the lamina were perfectly homogeneous. We shall be able shortly to extend still further the conditions under which this equation will be similarly applicable. It is easy to extend the above reasoning from a lamina to the general elevated mass. If, however, the value of I be different for different angu- lar positions of our line of a unit of length through P, (as, for instance, when a laminated or jointed structure prevails in the mass, or any accidental line of less resistance passes through the proposed point,) it is manifest that the direction of the fissure there will depend on the tensions and this vari- able value of IJ conjointly, and the equation above given will no longer suffice generally for its determination. ‘The case of Jaminated or jointed masses I professedly exclude from these investigations, since their lines of dislocation will’ necessarily Mr. Hopkins’s Abstract of his Memoir on Physical Geology. 275 be principally determined by their peculiar structure, and will therefore be in great measure independent of the causes whose effects I am investigating. The case however of the existence of partial and irregular lines of less resistance, re- garded as modifying, and not as principal causes, comes within the sphere of our investigations. We may now proceed to this point. . Recurring again to the simple case of a lamina, it is easily shown* that if a fissure in its continuous propagation through consecutive points meet a line of less resistance, it will be propagated across it without change of direction, or along it, according as a certain condition is or is not satisfied, this con- dition depending on the angle at which the fissure meets the line of less resistance, and the cohesive power along that line estimated in a direction perpendicular to it.. If this angle be a right angle the condition is necessarily satisfied, as it must be also if the angle do not deviate much from a right angle, unless the cohesive power just mentioned be extremely small, so that in such cases the line of less resistance will have no effect on the direction of the fissure. If the angle just men- tioned deviate too much from a right angle, the fissure will be propagated along the line of less resistance; but I have shownf that when this ceases to be the case it will almost im- mediately resume the direction determined by our equation, so that if these lines of less resistance exist only partially and irregularly, and be of limited extent, they will only produce partial deviations in the direction of the fissure, without very materially affecting its general bearing. This reasoning again is easily extended to the general mass. We shall now be able to arrive (as intimated above) at another and important condition respecting the constitution of the elevated mass, with which our equation will be strictly applicable to determine the direction of a fissure. Ifa single tension act at a point of a lamina, it is easily shown (and in fact is in itself sufficiently obvious,) that the resuiting fissure will be perpendicular to the direction of the tension, the co- hesive power being such as above shown (p. 274) to be consis- tent with the strict application of our equation. In like man- ner it may be easily conceived, that since all the tensions act in the planes of their respective laminae, whatever their hori- zontal directions may be, the resulting fissure, whatever may be its horizontal direction, must necessarily (independently of perturbing causes,) lie in a plane perpendicular to each Jamina at the points where it intersects it. Hence, then, it * Memoir, p. 24. + Memoir, p. 23. t Memoir, p. 14. 2¥F¢2 276 Mr. Hopkins’s Abstract of his Memoir on Physical Geology. follows that however small the cohesion may be between two successive lamin or strata, this will produce no effect on the position of the fissure. In such case then its horizontal di- rection will still be accurately determined by our equation. ‘This is important, because in a stratified mass the cohesion between different beds must probably be often much less than that between the constituent particles of each bed. The same conclusion will hold with respect to any accidental planes of less resistance which do not deviate too much from horizon- tality ; but if they be vertical, or nearly so, they will produce ‘the accidental and partial deviations which have already been noticed. In forming a judgement of the probable extent of these planes of less resistance, we must be careful not to be too much influenced by the impressions produced by the exami- nation of a disturbed district, since we are now speaking of the existence of these planes in the undisturbed mass. I would also observe, that we are only concerned with this kind of discontinuity in the cohesive power, so far as it depends on local and irregular, and not on general causes, since, as already stated, I exclude those cases in which any regularly jointed or laminated structure may be supposed to have existed in the mass previously to its elevation. Now as far as the planes we are speaking of might be caused by accidental circumstances in the constitution or deposition of the mass, it would seem necessary to suppose them irregular in position and partial in extent; in which case, as we have seen, partial deviations only would be produced by them in the vertical or horizontal directions of the fissure. It appears then from what has preceded, that the equation above given will accurately determine the direction of a fissure at any proposed point, produced by tensions such as we have supposed, not only in a homogeneous mass, but also in a mass in which there may be any number of planes of less resist- ance, provided they do not deviate too much from horizon- tality, and notwithstanding any variation in the cohesive power of the mass depending on the difference of position of one point and another. From the interpretation of the equation, it appears that the fissure (or rather its intersection with a horizontal plane) will in general be rectilinear only in the , &c. are the same fi, fa F particular case in which the ratios : r? for every point through which it passes, supposing the direc- tions of the tensions at one point respectively parallel to those at another. There is, however, one important exception, viz. Mr. Hopkins’s Abstract of his Memoir on Physical Geology. 277 the case in which there are two tensions only, and these ten- sions at right angles to each other. The direction of the fis- sures will then be always perpendicular to that of the greater tension. If therefore the directions of this tension at different points be parallel to each other, the fissure will be rectilinear, whatever be the ratio of the two tensions. The case of a single tension is a particular case of the above, when the smaller tension vanishes. If there be two tensions making an acute angle with each other, the direction of the fissure will be within the exterior or obtuse angle between the directions . . . 5 . of the tensions; and if one tension be considerably greater than the other, or if the angle between their directions do not deviate materially from a right angle, the fissure will lie much nearer to the direction of the smaller tension* than to that of the greater. III. Having thus explained how a single fissure may be formed, and its direction determined, let us consider the for- mation of a number of similar fissures all following the same law, and not remote from each other, thus forming a system of fissures. In the greater number of cases in which such sy- stems have been recognised the lines of dislocation have been approximately rectilinear and parallel. It will suffice, there- fore, to take this case, which will be somewhat the most simple to explain. In the first place I have considered in my memoir, how far it would be possible that the fissures of a system should be formed consecutively. For this purpose I have examined the modification which would be produced in the tension of the mass by the existence of a rectilinear fissure extending for any assigned distance, assuming, for the greater simplicity, the mass to be acted on by one system of tensions perpendicular to the fissure ; and it appears that if we draw a line perpendi- cular to the fissure and meeting it at a point P, not too near its extremities, the tension at any proposed point of this line and in its direction (or perpendicular to the fissure) will be less than that which will be caused by the existence of the fissure, in a direction parallel to itself, provided the distance of the proposed point from the fissure be less than the radius of curvature at P of the curve formed by the intersection of the vertical side of the fissure with a horizontal planet. Now it has been before stated that when there are two tensions at any point in directions perpendicular to each other, if they produce a fissure it must be perpendicular to the greater of * Considerably nearer to it than the resultant of two forces respectively equal in intensity to the two tensions, and in the same directions. + Memoir, p. 33. 278 Mr. Hopkins’s Abstract of his Memoir on Physical Geology. these tensions, and therefore, in the present case, perpendi- cular to the former fissure. Consequently, since the radius of curvature above mentioned will, if the fissure be of con- siderable length, be very large at every point, it will be im- possible for a second fissure to be formed parallel to the first and not very remote from it, by the general tensions to which the mass is supposed to be subjected *. We may conceive, however, any number of parallel fissures in the case we are considering to be formed simultaneously. Acotctgtt aes Bute ae a ey Thus suppose two parallel fissures, AP, A'P’, produced by tensions acting perpendicularly to their directions, to begin simultaneously at A and A’, and also to arrive at P, P’ at the same instant, P P! being perpendicular to A P and A’ P". There will manifestly be no reason why they should not in such case be continued simultaneously from P, P’, just as they began at the same instant at A and A’. If, however, the re- laxation produced by the opening of A P be communicated through the distance P P! instantaneouslyt, it is clear that as soon as A P should have advanced in its progressive forma- tion by the smallest quantity further than the other fissure, the formation of this latter would be instantly arrested. Un- der such circumstances, then, the possibility of the simulta- neous formation of two or more fissures would be rather a mathematical than a physical possibility. The fact is, how- ever, that the relaxation produced by the one fissure is not communicated instantaneously to the distance of the other. Time will be necessary for this purpose, and this removes the difficulty of conceiving this mode of formation, since it is no longer necessary that the velocities of propagation of the two fissures should be mathematically equal. For, suppose one fissure to have reached P when the other has reached Q’, * If there were another system of tensions perpendicular to the first, this conclusion weuld be true for still greater distances from the existing fissure. We may remark that these two cases of tensions would seem to be the only ones in which systems of rectilinear parallel fissures near each other could in any way be produced. See Memoir, p. 36. + This would be the case if the mass were absolutely inextensible. Mr. Hopkins’s Abstract of his Memoir on Physical Geology. 279 then it is easily seen that if the velocity of propagation of the first fissure should be such as to continue it from Q to P, in less time than the relaxation of the tension would be commu- nicated from Q to Q’, (Q Q' being parallel to P P’,) the con- tinued formation of A! Q’ would not be arrested. Now I have shown* that the velocity of propagation will be extremely great, so that the distance Q! P’ may be large, and all physi- cal impossibility is therefore entirely removed. Let us sup- pose, for instance, a system of parallel fissures to begin simul- taneously along the lower surface of the elevated mass, and to be propagated upwards +. If the mass be nearly homoge- neous, the velocity of propagation will be nearly infinite; and if the fissures be not too near together, it is very possible that the time requisite for the relaxation of the tension to be com- municated from one fissure to the distance of the next, may be greater than that which is necessary to propagate the fis- sures to the upper surface of the mass. In this case it is manifest that every fissure will necessarily be continued to that surface. It seems most probable, however, that in actual cases, similar to that just stated, a part only of the fissures commencing below would reach the higher portion of the mass. If its thickness should be very great, the fissures reaching the surface would probably be at a proportionally greater distance from each other. In this manner, then, the formation of systems of parallel fissures presents no difficulty. Adopting this view of the sub- ject, we are immediately led to the conclusion, that the whole of any disturbed district, characterized by a continuous system of parallel dislocations, must have been elevated simultaneously. It is not, however, here meant to be asserted that the whole elevation must have taken place at once, but that that move- ment which determined the positions of the principal and cha- racteristic dislocations by causing the commencement of their formation, must have been a great movement, and must have extended at least as far as such dislocations may be observed to follow continuously the same law. Subsequent efforts of the elevatory forces might take place in any number, but it is evident that they would have but little effect in producing new fissures parallel to the former, (since the mass would generally yield along the old ones,) though they may be very instru- * Memoir, p. 22. + | have shown (Memoir, p. 43) that fissures must generally commence in the lower portion of the mass; and we may remark, that according to our hypothesis respecting the rapid increase of intensity of the elevating force, from the instant the elevation commences, the formation of the fis. sures must begin almost accurately at the same instant, 280 Mr. Hopkins’s Abstract ofhis Memoir on Physical Geology. mental in extending those existing previously. Partial eleva- tions, or subsidences, may be easily conceived to be thus pro- duced; but whatever alteration may take place in this man- ner, in the general conformation of the district, must be un- der the guidance, as it were, of the fissures previously ex- isting. Nothing perhaps will tend’'more to corroborate the views I have been explaining on this important point of the forma- tion of systems of fissures, than the attempts we may make to account for it otherwise, assuming always that the phe- nomena are due to the action of mechanical causes extraneous to the mass itself, and independent of that kind of internal molecular action to which the existence of joints, or of a la- minated structure, may possibly be owing. In the first place, I have shown that two parallel fissures not remote from each other could not be formed consecutively by a repetition of the elevatory action extending to the whole elevated mass; this consecutive formation, if it should take place at all, must therefore be owing to consecutive partial efforts of the eleva- tory force at different points of the mass. But I have shown* that, if the elevatory force be confined to a portion of the mass of comparatively small superficial extent, fissures must either be formed diverging from it in all directions, such as have been recognised in Mount Etna, and in the groups of the Cantal and Mont Dor, or concentric about the vertex, so that it is mechanically impossible that systems of parallel fis- sures could be thus produced. In fact, I can in no way con- ceive this successive formation of parallel fissures, without hypotheses respecting the mode of action of the elevatory force which are infinitely too arbitrary to be admitted for an instant. After one system of fissures is formed, there is no difficulty whatever in conceiving the formation of a second system per- pendicular to the former. The existence of two rectilinear parallel fissures must evidently destroy all tension in the por- tion of the mass between them, but will have no effect on the extension, or therefore on the tension which may exist in a direction parallel to the fissures, the only one in fact in which any tension can be impressed on a part of the mass so situ- ated. Consequently whatever tendency there may be to form a second system of fissures, it must necessarily be in a direc- tion perpendicular to that already existing. This second system might be formed by any forces, however partial or irregular their action, (always assuming ft not absolutely zm- * Memoir, p. 47. “Mr. John T. Graves on the Logarithms of Unity. 281 pulsive,) since the only direction in which the mass ‘could ad- mit of any tension being impressed upon it would be, as just stated, that parallel to the first system. It seems to be me- chanically impossible that any second system of parallel fissures could be thus formed except in the direction here stated. [To be continued.] LVII. On the lately proposed Logarithms of Unity, in Reply to Professor De Morgan. By Joun T. Graves, of the Inner Temple, Esq., M.A. To the Editors of the Philosophical Magazine and Journal. GENTLEMEN, | the Philosophical Transactions for 1829, and in the abs- tract of a memoir printed in the Fourth Report of the British Association, it is proposed to modify the ordinary formule for the logarithms of unity and of numbers in general by certain rather startling extensions. These innovations Prof. De Morgan is not disposed to admit, as appears from sec- tions (158.) and (245.) of his able and useful Treatise on the Calculus of Functions, recently published in the Encyclopedia Metropolitana. His principal difficulty seems to be founded Qin on his dissent from the proposition that e 247-vW—-1 = i, and accordingly be challenges the supporters of the new theory to the proof of that equation. Now in one sense I do Qin not either assert or admit its accuracy; for e2t™—W—1 has many values, while 1 has only one. I am bound, however, Qin to show that 1 is among the values of e2in— V¥—=1, To show this would be to prove, that, according to my under- standing of the term, tho is a Neperian* logarithm of 1. Icall} an e-log. of —1/e as wellas of +c. If I am told that logarithm ought to be so defined that x ought to be called an a-log. or a logarithm to base a only of the® * I have been accustomed to write “ Neperian” instead of “ Napierian,” because the inventor of logarithms, in the title of his original work on the subject, signs his name in Latin, “ Neperus”’ ; because the Scottish mode of spelling the name was unfixed in his time, and because foreigners have generally adopted the Latin orthography. Third Series. Vol. 8. No. 47. April 1836. 2G 282 Mr. Graves’s Repiy to Prof. De Morgan’s Remarks arithmetical value of a’, I must say that I should not approve such a restriction. It would, if the proposed theorems be cor- rect, arbitrarily exclude from the xame of logarithms orders of functions which enjoy the same fundamental and characteristic properties as those that are favoured with that name. It would also in some cases be difficult of application. The expression = a = (m—/ —1%)? has two values. If we adopt the restricted definition, of which of those values shall we be allowed to call 1 a logarithm with reference to the base m— 7 —1n? On the other hand, there are cases where a” has an infinite num- ber of real and positive values. But I proceed to prove that Qin 1 is among the values of e 2¢m— V —1 from postulates which I believe will be conceded by Professor De Morgan. For all values of x, real or imaginary, by cos z, I denote a x x 1 eh een Asse a ee and by sin x I denote wv a 2 a’ TRILL SST ML SAG LLSAse Cee I assume that j 2 qa? Rebige Tongegnit ages? Pe: Athi y* y sles fig Wye tout (vty) , (waty)? , (e@+y)* 3 it 1 Tantdes T 7.2.3 vip (3.) that the complete and correct equation for e” is aneee x x a Ante (14 ig. Ce aes (- and that, if w denote in succession O and all integers positive * and negative, the values of 1° are properly represented by the formula cos (2wam)+* 7 —1 sin(2wez). (5.) * I have found that upon the whole it tends to superior clearness of notation to place ./—1 foremost.where it occurs as a factor. on the lately proposed Logarithms of Unity. 283 From these premises it follows irresistibly that ghee {1+ eres + Be Fr wb 2 Cag cist jal alae Opn (6.) but by (3.) this product is equal to (Y—12wr+1) | (W—12wr+l)? esim@L, yal Sips tga 1.2 x i (7 —12w2+1) 1.2.3 The development (7.) therefore is complete and correct, having as many values, and only as many, as e”. é Zea, (7.) 3 End a 21 ’ To apply this result, on substituting ee ae for x in Qix 1 (7.), we find that the values of e 2?7—~—1 are represented by the formula ap (Gv) Lvichaia 2imr—V/—1 2war—V/—1\? (7 —1 2i7) es eer 1.2 2wr—V/—1\3 (VW —1 iz) ty ™— Vai) 1.2.3 (8) Now, among the values of (8.), which are found by giving to win that formula all its values in succession, there is one Qin value (which I denote by e; 2**—“—1) that will correspond to the case of w = i, in which case the development (8.) re- duces itself to (f—12in) (W=—19ir? W—12in)3 ie die en ee gag Pc} ON) LE = cos(2im)+ /f—I1sin(2inz) = 1. Q.E.D. eee It may be remarked that, tested by formula (7.), the ex- pression ¢ /—12i% wil] be found to have an infinite number 2G2 284 Mr. Graves’s Reply to Prof. De Morgan’s Remarks of real values, which are successively equal to 1, and to the . . —din*®_. . . ascending integral powers of e, 4’ o° with their reciprocals. The expression e,~4'™’ is equivalent to cos (/ —1 477°) +7 —1 sin(/—1 422°). In these investigations there is often much convenience in thus putting imaginary quantities after sin and cos, and the want of familiarity with this practice: has, perhaps, been an obstacle to the full comprehension of the new theory. There is another objection started by Professor De Morgan but not pursued. He says that after supposing a = /4, where f§ = cos 6 + 7 —1 sin 6, I find a = f(xf-a), but that I should have obtained precisely the same expression, if I had assumed 6 = e°*, c being any quantity whatever. By e°*, I here understand the Professor to mean ‘hat particular cé site c 6 (c 6)* (c4)° value of e-~ which is equal to 1+ — + eo ay 1.2.3 1 and which I should denote by ey *. On this understanding I fully agree with his statement, but not with the inference which I suppose him to draw from it. I suppose him tacitly to infer, without minute examination, that when /@ = cos 6 + eee, + s/—1 siné, or &”“—14 the expression f(2f-!a) cannot have so general a meaning as it would have if the meaning of f$ were generalized in the mode he mentions. ‘This is an in- ference which, if the functional definition of a* adopted by me were admitted to be proper, would at most only charge my solution with not being sufficiently general. I acknow- ledge, indeed, that the impropriety of that definition would be evinced, if it fairly led to a meaning of a? which subverted any established exponential theorems more fundamental than those which that definition embodies, or if by the inconvenient generality of the values it would comprise, the expediency of a further limiting equation of condition were pointed out. The supposed inference, however, as above stated, is not cor- rect, for it happens that even if /@ were assumed equal to 2 3 oh Leh 1 1.2 1.2.3 be unaffected by any variation of c, since it would indicate operations which would eliminate ¢ from the result. That re- sult would in consequence be identical with mine, and if ex- amined with a little attention, would be perceived entirely to 1+ +..., the expression f(x f~'a) would on the lately proposed Logarithms of Unity. 285 coincide with what is ordinaily understood by a” in all cases where the meaning of a®. has been fixed by usage, and to confer a reasonable analogical meaning on a* where usage has been silent. The definition of a* which I adopt is this: a* denotes in succession every function ¢ x of x, which, inde- pendently of x and y, fulfils the following conditions: or. oy = o(rt+y) (9.) aca (10.) This definition is, perhaps, the simplest that could be pro- posed, the most extensively applicable and the most accordant of any with other less fundamental properties of a” which have been observed to hold good within certain limits. The abstract contained in the Fourth Report of the British Association does not contain the reasoning by which I find JF (x f-'a) to be the general solution for a*, f§ being equal to cos 6 +4/—1 sin 6. My reasoning is as follows: I first proceed to show that if fx and fx denote two func- tions of x, each of which fulfils condition (9.), we shall have Jf 2 = f(x), c being some constant. Let f' 2 = fa, yx being some unknown function of «, the form of which is sought: then by the assumed property of f’, we shall have fpa. fly = fv (x+y); but by the same property of f,; we have fla. fly =f(ba+ vy). Hence fy (x# +y) =f(va+ vy). Now, if ¥ (x + y) differ from Pa + Wy, let 64+ ) (7+ y) = x+y; then we shall have f{6+¥(x+y)} =f(ve +vy) =f (c+y); but by the property of f f {6+ (x+y) any + y); hence fo. fp (e+ y) =f (x + y); hence il. Hence the general equation to find Wx is b+0(r7+y)=vetby, (11.) § being some quantity such that f9 = 1. Let Pr—b=We (12.) By this substitution we obtain from (11.) Vety=Vordy (13.) I consider equation (13.) the purely algebraic part of the best definition that can be given of what is meant by multiplication in its extended sense, since that definition is based on the most characteristic formal property of multiplication in arith- metic, the science suggestive of symbolic rules, In my view of algebra, if we presuppose arithmetic in general, and alge- braic addition, we may at once, on having obtained equation 286 Mr. Graves’s Reply to Prof. De Morgan’s Remarks (13.), assume v2 = ca, ¢ being some algebraic multiplier, since it is impossible to arrive at any simpler proof than the mere form of the proposition. For those to whom this assumption may not seem satisfac- tory, we may make the proof that f 2 = c¢ w rest upon dif- ferent data. Whatever be the form of & and value of 4, Wie ty +h)—V(e+y) h whether / be regarded as the increment of 2 or y. We have therefore in general dV (x+y) _ dv (r+y) PAS GT dy (14) or, in this particular case, performing the respective partial differentiations on the equivalent expression in (13.), we ob- tain the expression remains unaltered, d(Vatvy) dvr _dWartVy) dwy ani Pans or = ee eet (15.) dVa dy a? it must be independent but since is equal to da daz be equal to some quantity fed. We assume that the ge- neral form of fcdwz is ¢ + ¢.x, but 0 is the only value of cin the equation P2 = ¢ + cz, which will be found to satisfy equation (13.). Hence Pa = cz. Having satisfied ourselves in whatever way, that Va = cx is the general solution of (13.), we have, by (12.), Ya = 6+ex, Hence fbx or fx = f(§t+ex); but f(i+cx) = fb. f(c x) =1.f(er) =f(cr). Hence fr =f (cz). = ¢, then ‘x must of x, and therefore constant*. Let Q. E. D. Hence, if any function fx could be found to satisfy (9.), Ff (cx), ¢ being wholly arbitrary, would be the general solution of (9.). Equation (10.), which defines the base of the system, limits the otherwise arbitrary c to such values that fc may be equal to 1. Hence a* = f(cx), ¢ assuming in succession all the values of f—1a, and none other. The next step in the investigation is to find some function (no matter what) that fulfils condition (9.), and to determine the general form of its inverse. Such a function I find in cos 6 + s/f —] sin 6. * By similar considerations we might find at once from equation (9.), P : é dQu without having recourse to Taylor's theorem, that oa = cOxn, on the lately proposed Logarithms of Unity. 287 I have perused with interest Professor De Morgan’s ob- servations on the impossibility of ever proving that we have arrived at the most general solution of a functional equation. It seems to me, however, that our only limit to the meaning of the general symbols employed in the solution of such equa~ tions is the necessity of their compliance with certain formal conditions, which must by tacit or express convention be considered elementary and definitional. Now, I think, we may sometimes show that given functional equations can be solved by the solution of certain others expressing such ele- mentary conditions, and by such solution only. When we can show this, we are at liberty, in my opinion, to substitute the symbols which the latter equations define, and to pro- nounce ourselves in possession of the most general solution. This subject deserves further consideration. There is an error in the abstract of my last memoir. I there appear in substance to define cosine and sine to mean respectively such functions ¢ and as simultaneously fulfil thefollowing conditions : guoy —vabvy = o(e@+y) (16.) oubyt+veoy=vurty) (17) (¢2P + (var)? = 1 (18.) These conditions do not constitute a sufficiently limited de- finition to coincide with the ordinary acceptation of cosine and sine. The general solution of (16.) and (17.) gives ¢a j ays if pate » a Sex) cake ze) and va = fies) Le 2), where S§ means, as before, cos§ + / —1 sin 4, cos and sin @ being defined by equations (1.) and (2.).. The third condition (18.) only requires that c’ should be equal to —<, and so only limits $v to cos (ca) and Y2 to sin(cx). If instead of the third condition we were to substitute the following, viz. dy: 1 by ele 0) ote 5 , we should have a good definition coinciding with dua Oo (1.) and (2.). I am anxious to embrace the present opportunity of cor- recting a former involuntary misrepresentation with respect toProfessor Ohm. I find that his logarithmic formule are not only coincident in principle with mine, but coextensive in their applicability to imaginary as well as real quantities. On some future occasion, Gentlemen, I shall be happy, with your permission, to communicate my investigations re- lating to the limits of the possibility of finding a base , such or = ‘288 Prof. Challis on the Phenomena of that a particular specified value (2;*) of #* may be equal toc, a and c being given. My results are shortly stated in the Fourth Report of the British Association, p. 528. The question bears closely on the subject of the solution of equations in- volving surds and their “ chance” of representable roots, a subject which was treated in an interesting and logical man- ner by Mr. W.G. Horner in a letter to be found, p. 43, of the January Number of your Magazine for this year. I hope also that you will be able to find room for a statement of the restrictions which various ordinary exponential theorems re- quire, and for a few useful equations and developments. With sentiments of sincere respect, I have the honour to be, Gentlemen, yours, &c., Inner Temple, Feb. 12, 1836. Joun T. GRAvEs. LVIII. On the Phenomena of Drops of Oil floating on Water. By the Rev. Professor Cua.uis.* AM not aware that the following facts, connected with the subject of capillary attraction, have been before observed. A single drop of salad oil was let fall on the surface of water contained in a glass tumbler, and was seen to spread imme- diately on the water surface. Another drop let fall shortly after on a part of the surface not reached by the spreading of the first, was not observed to spread in the least degree like the other, but instantly assumed a well-defined circular shape. The first drop also collapsed by degrees into a circular form ; and this, it was found by repeating the experiment, was most likely to happen when the drop was not of very small size. When two drops fell in very quick succession, both of them were observed to spread, but that which reached the surface last, spread in less degree than the other, and sooner assumed a circular shape. The smaller the size of the spreading drops, the greater appeared to be their tendency to spread. In one instance a very small drop was seen to be succeeded by an- other ata considerable interval, which also spread, but in much less degree. These phenomena were uniformly pre- sented in a great number of trials, fresh water being put into the glass after each. The chief thing to remark is, that without any visible connexion between the first drop and the succeed- ing ones, the manner in which the latter are affected on coming into contact with the water is influenced by the previous con- tact of the first. The explanation I propose to give of this fact will be drawn * Communicated by the Author. Drops of Oil floating on Water. 289 from the theory of the molecular forces of fluids contained in my communication to the February Number of this Journal. It is there supposed that the sphere of action of the attractive molecular forces of fluids is much greater than that of the re- pulsive, and that the latter increase so rapidly with any de- crement of the mutual distances of the molecules, as to be taken account of without sensible error by considering the fluid incompressible. On this supposition the angle of actual contact between a solid and a fluid, or that between two fluids, is determined by the hydrostatical equilibrium resulting from the molecular attractions of the two substances, the solid like the fluid being treated as incompressible. It thence appeared that this is an exceedingly small angle in cases in which the bodies in contact are not of very different specific gravities. Hence in the instance before us, the angle of contact, that is, the angle which the surface of contact of the oil and water makes with the upper free surface of the oil, is very small. Bat since the drop is convex both at its upper and under sur- faces, this is apparently an angle of considerable magnitude. In fact the theoretical angle of contact, or that which the upper surface of the oil makes with an imaginary surface drawn parallel to its under surface and just beyond the sphere of the molecular action of the water, would be found by cal- culation to be of sensible magnitude. Consequently, that the angle of actual contact may be exceedingly small, the portion of the upper surface of the oil that lies within the sphere of the molecular action of the water must undergo a flexure near the visible periphery of the drop. Now in fulfilling this condition it seems probable that a very thin film of the oil spreads over the whole water surface, (as there is no force to counteract,) and gives rise at the same time to the visible spreading of the first drop. The film itself being of less thickness than the radius of the sphere of the molecular action of the water, will not be perceptible to the senses. Such a cir- cumstance having happened to the drop that first comes in contact with the water, will prevent any that succeed from being similarly affected. I take this opportunity of adverting to the editorial note (signed E. W. B.) in the February Number, (p. 172,) on my communication in that Number, and thanking the author of it for correcting the erroneous assertion that mercury is inca- pable of adhering to solids, which was inconsiderately made of solids in general, when I was more particularly referring to glass. In accordance with the authorities quoted in the note, the theory I was explaining would lead to the inference Third Series. Vol. 8. No. 47. April 1836. 2H 290 Attraction of Aggregation and Chemical Affinity. that mercury is capable of moistening substances of greater or not much less specific gravity than itself, by showing that the angle of actual contact with them may be exceedingly small. With respect to the kind of molecular force to which the mathematical reasoning was intended to apply, I may observe that in strictness it is applicable only to that which is usually called the attraction of aggregation, a familiar instance of which, wholly independent of chemical affinity, is seen in water adhering to ice. I was unacquainted with Mr. Fara- day’s observations on this subject referred to in the note, but having since perused them, I quite agree with him in thinking that in the contact of two dissimilar substances this force is modified by chemical affinity, even when no chemical action takes place between them. There are, however, no means at present of estimating this effect mathematically. It is pro- bably greatest in the state bordering on chemical action. Analysis applied to the case of perfect contact caused by the attraction of aggregation alone, (which is a simple instance of the statzcs of molecular forces,) leads to the inference that the same fluid will rise to the same height in different capil- lary tubes: and Link’s experiments show, in fact, that water rose to the same height between glass, copper, and zinc plates ; sulphuric acid, between glass and copper plates; muriatic acid, between glass and copper; liquid caustic alkali, between glass and zinc; liquid ascetic* alkali (sp. gr. 17145), between glass and zinc. ‘The deviations from the law in the other in- stances may therefore be owing to chemical affinity, perhaps also to chemical action. The same causes would affect the heights of ascent of different fluids in the same tube. But I am disposed to think that in addition to these causes, the dif- ference of heights depends on the different natural conditions of the fluids. For instance, the most volatile fluids, which are probably those that are most perfectly fluid, appear by the experiments to rise least. A small degree of viscidity, it will perhaps be admitted, would tend to increase the height of ascent, if the condition of perfect contact be maintained. To separate the effect of chemical affinity from that of the attrac- tion of aggregation, requires experiments more numerous and varied than any that have hitherto been made. Observatory, Cambridge, March 11, 1836. * [Carbonated ?] Kii2oa) J LIX. Remarks on Lieutenant Lecount’s Treatise on Iron Rails. By Peter Bartow, Esq., F.R.S.* N amusing but not a very accurate critique of my Reports to the Directors of the London and Birmingham Railway Company having been recently published by Lieutenant Le- count, R.N., which must, I suppose, be considered as the last expiring groans of the fish-bellied rails, in which critique many of my formule are made to suffer woful transforma- tions, allow me in their defence to make a few observations, and they shall be very few. The author commences his in- quiry at page 20, and as an earnest of what is to follow, his very first step is to correct a simple trigonometrical expression Ihave given, (which is perfectly right as it stands,) and by his correction to render it ambiguous. With this corrected for- mula, however, after another forty pages, he contrives to prove what I have stated at page 19 of my Report, viz. that by taking a most injudicious form of parallel rail, we may get one inferior to the fish-bellied rail of the same weight. Now my object has been to prove, on the other hand, that by choosing a judicious section we may get one as decidedly superior; and I have no doubt that thus far both conclusions are just, notwith- standing the ambiguity of his formula. As it stands in my Report, the expression is V(r? + d® —2drcos 2); and Mr. Lecount, not recollecting that the cosines in the se- cond quadrant are negative and that “ minus into minus pro-~ duces plus,” has thought it necessary to make the alteration in question :—any student in trigonometry will judge with what propriety. The next 47 pages are employed to prove that all my rules for the neutral axis are unfounded; which of course they ought to be, if all Mr. Lecount says about them be correct. I will not even suspect that he has designedly misrepresented and misapplied my investigations, but I must say that the re- sult he conceives he has arrived at, page 107, is very far from a correct statement. It would seem from what he says, that I give the ratio of 1 to 9 for all cases. Now, if he had pro- perly understood what I had done, and if he had wished to have properly represented it, he would have informed the reader, that I had given a rule which was general for all bars; and that as an approximate rule only, sufficiently exact for all practical purposes, I had stated that taking the neutral axis in the middle of the head was nearly correct for all the usual forms of rails, and, as it happens, (the rail in question being * Communicated by the Author. AD 292 Mr. Barlow on Lieut. Lecount’s Treatise on Iron Rails. five inches deep and the head an inch deep,) the ratio in that particular case is 1 to 9. The worst, however, is what follows in the subsequent chap- ters, where he compares my computed, or rather his com- puted, results with my experiments, and where by a very un- accountable blunder he mistakes through the other 87 pages my columns of index readings for deflections, and pays me and my rules some very awkward compliments because the two do not agree. Now, I should have wondered very much if they had, for they might as well be compared with the co- lumn of sunrisings in any page of an almanac as with the column of numbers he has mistaken for deflections. I have explained, (I should havethought sufficiently clearly, ) at p. 36 of my First Report, what these numbers are, and how the deflections in the adjacent columns are obtained from them; and must think that Mr. Lecount is the only person who has yet misunderstood them. I have called them in the head of the column, to mark the distinction, deflections by index in some places, and in others index readings; but in ali the tables the adjacent column is headed deflections for each ton, and it is this column alone with which comparisons can be made; and I must repeat that I cannot help thinking that Mr. Lecount is the only person who has yet fallen into this singular error. If I had not a better opinion of his integrity, I should be almost inclined to think it was a designed mistake to make outa case in favour of the fish-bellied rail, but of this I most fully acquit him; but then to what am [ to attribute it? I know but of one other explanation. As an example or two of the kind here referred to, the reader will excuse my quoting the following. At page 109 he says, “ Mr. Barlow gives the mean deflection per ton at 015, and the deflection for 74 tons ‘107; whereas in the very same table, and only three lines above this deduction of +107 deflection for 74 tons, it is shown in the experiment that at 7 tons it was actually °335, or three times greater than that which is deduced by this mode of proceeding for 74 tons There is some mistake here evidently.” Evidently there is, Mr. Lecount, and it is this; you have mistaken my index readings for deflections: if you will look again you will find that you could not have found a better proof of the correctness of my deductions. Again, page 151, Mr. Lecount says: * Mr. Barlow himself, p. 103, Second Report, states the deflection by computa- tion, &c. to be from +051 to ‘055 with 11 tons, although in the same page, and only three lines above, the experimental deflection is registered from actual observation 0717. What Mr. Squire on the Solar Eclipse of May 15th. 293 have we here to do with calculation or hypothesis? We see the thing before our eyes; the rail does deflect 0717; and why are we told that it only deflects 055?” Now, I say, the rail does not deflect 0717: if Mr. Lecount will turn again to page 103, he will find that what he takes for “ deflections by com- putations, &c. from ‘051 to ‘055,” are the experimental de- flections ; and that ‘0717, the number “before our eyes”, is only the index reading. Mr. L. thus passes through all my pages from 36, First Report, to 103, Second Report, with a total misapprehension of my tables. I am sure, therefore, his readers will readily excuse his having occasionally misunderstood my deductions from them. I might, if I had leisure, amuse myself and perhaps the reader with many other specimens of the author’s ingenuity ; indeed, I really think he has subjected himself to prosecution for the torture which he has inflicted on my differential equa- tions; but I have, perhaps, said enough to show that my rules are not quite so ill-founded as Mr. Lecount would lead his readers to believe ; at the same time I will readily admit that with all the varieties of iron only mean results can be ex- pected, and “that two bars of the same weight and form will have different degrees of strength,” &c.; but if I have fitted them to what iron of a good quality (not the best) ought to bear, it is all that I profess; and from many experiments made since my Report was published, I have reason to believe I have succeeded. Mr. Lecount concludes his preface by saying: “ It requires a man of some nerve to face such a leviathan as Professor Barlow on mathematical points, but it was necessary that some person should do it, and it appears the lot has fallen on Jonah, with what advantages others must judge.” Perhaps a little more attention to what he was reading with a view to criticise it, would have been better than mere nerve to have contended with his supposed formidable opponent. As to the advantages, I must leave that question to be settled between Jonah and his readers. LX. On the Solar Eclipse of May \5th, 1836, particularly as it will be seen at Alnwick, in Northumberland. By 'Tuomas Squire, Esq. To the Editors of the Philosophical Magazine and Journal. GENTLEMEN, F all the anticipated celestial phanomena of the present year, the large solar eclipse which happens on Sunday, 294 Mr.-Squire on the Solar Eclipse of May 15th. May 15, p.M., must be considered to rank foremost in a popu- j lar point of view. This eclipse, it is well known, will be an- nular in the North of England, and central across Northum- berland. It also further appears that this central track will run very nearly over the town of Alnwick, and on looking at the line of its course, it is clear that this place will be found the most convenient and proper for observing this eclipse under its greatest magnitude; with this impression I have been induced to send you the results of my computations of the same for that place, with some other trifling matters re- lating to this subject, which I hope you will find a corner for in the next Number of the Philosophical Magazine. Particulars of the large Solar Eclipse of May 15, p.m., 1836 ; computed for the Latitude and Longitude of Alnwick.* © eclipsed May 15th, p.m. comp. for Alnwick. Beginning.......... 1" 41™58*] ,at 45° 56' 58" west of the ©'s 1.1. Begs of annulus ....3 5 544 ( )’scentre N. of ©’s = 5!'"1646 ; : ’ then will the greatest breadth Middlesg ha. Visi. 3 813349 ofthe annulus be 56/8446, Visible d@p ....-..3 8 147 and least 46/5154. End of annulus ....3 10 32:2 End of eclipse...... 4.28 2:1, at 34°54! 46” from the ©’s vertex. For the basis of these calculations, I have supposed the geographical latitude of Alnwick to be 55° 25! 22" N. or its geocentric 55° 14’ 49", and longitude 1° 28’ W. of the Royal Observatory, Greenwich. The rare phenomenon of a central eclipse in England, and the opportunity it offers for scientific inquiry, will no doubt be an inducement for many gentlemen to visit Alnwick, and its neighbourhood, for the purpose of making such observa- tions on the present eclipse as may be conducive to the ex- tension of our knowledge in astronomy and _ philosophy. Should the atmosphere be favourable the observer must not only be careful to observe the beginning and end with the greatest accuracy, but also the immersions and emersions of the solar spots; the inflection of light about the beginning and ending of the annular formation ; and it will also be interesting to observe what stars are visible. The barometer and ther- mometer should be attended to, and experiments made on the calorific effects of the solar rays on different bodies, regard being had to the magnitude of the eclipse at the same time. Moreover, the colour and shade of objects should be at- * The instants are given in mean solar time according to the meridian of that place. Prof. Young on Vanishing Fractions. 295 tended to; and it may be proper to notice what effect the gloom has upon animals and plants, &c.* I remain, Gentlemen, yours, &c. Epping, March 15, 1836. Tuomas SoQuire. P.S. During the annular observation the light and heat will be about zy of that of the full sun. LXI. Observations upon Mr. Woolhouse’s Theory of Vanish- ing Fractions. By J.R.Youne, Esq., Professor of Mathe- matics in Belfast College.+ T was a remark of D’Alembert, that in all subjects except in the mathematical sciences, there was room for difference of sentiment. This exception, however, in favour of mathe- matics was unadvisedly made by D’Alembert, as his own dis- putes with Euler, on the subject of imaginary logarithms, fully prove. Nor is this, the only mathematical topic upon which very considerable difference of sentiment has prevailed. The doctrine of vanishing fractions, a subject of far higher interest and importance, has been the source of much more keen and frequent controversy among mathematicians, and respecting which doctrine there is by no means harmony of opinion even at the present day; and this is a circumstance doubtless to be regretted, because of the frequent and un- avoidable occurrence of these fractions in various departments of analytical research. To the aspiring student such con- flicting theories in a part of the “ exact sciences” must be a source of much perplexity. It must be embarrassing to feel that if he assent to the reasoning of the profound Waring, he must oppose himself to that of the cautious Maseres; and that if he adopt the views of Professor Woodhouse, he must dis- card the arguments of Dr. Hutton. It cannot, however, be denied that the opinions of Waring and Hutton are those which most accord with the ordinary views of modern analysts, in reference to this subject; and it was scarcely to have been expected that any mathematical theory should now be pro- mulgated condemnatory of conclusions which, in the works of our ablest modern analysts, wear all the aspect of mathema- tical certainty. An essay has, however, been recently pub- lished, by a very ingenious and able mathematician, embody- [* Particular directions for observing an Annular Solar Eclipse, adapted to every class of observers, and to the use of instruments of every degree of perfection and power, will be found in Mr. Baily’s Memoir on the An- nular Eclipse of Sept. 7, 1820,—Phil. Mag., First Series, vol. lv, p..85.— Epit. | + Communicated by the Author, 296 Prof. Young’s Observations upon ing statements and positions, in reference to this important in- quiry, of a very peculiar kind, and which appear to me to be not - only opposed to well-established truths, but calculated, under the protection of his name, to retard—what I am sure that gentleman is most anxious to promote—the spread of pure scientific truth. It is from the same anxiety for truth that I here venture, very briefly, to examine the more prominent of the positions adverted to, and this I do with the same sen- timents of respect and regard which I have long entertained for his talents and friendship. I cannot, perhaps, in strictness, say that my own defence requires that I should reply to the animadversions which Mr. Woolhouse has made upon the views which, in conimon with so many others, [ entertain on the subject of vanishing fractions, although I think I am pri- vileged to show that my friend has not supplied the place of these views, which he has very unsparingly censured, by others that will bear the test of careful examination. With many of the observations in Mr. Woolhouse’s Essay I am disposed en- tirely to agree, as being in strict accordance with the usual notions of this doctrine; but the new theory, for which the Essay is chiefly remarkable, seems to me to have been much too hastily framed; it is embodied in the very general propo- sitions which follow : I. “ If, in any investigation of a geometrical problem, the unknown quantity is expressed by a fraction which, in a parti- cular case, becomes a vanishing one, the problem in that case will resolve itself into a porism, and the value of the fraction, or unknown quantity, will then admit of arbitrary assumption; and a similar result will follow in all such cases, whatever be the nature of the investigation.” II. ‘* Whenever, in an analytical investigation, the resulting expression for a quantity resolves itself into a vanishing frac- tion, we may observe, as a general rule, that either one of the original conditions of the inquiry becomes destroyed, or that two or more of them become dependent, and, consequently, whichever way it be, that there is at least one condition less to fulfill, and that the vanishing fraction is not restricted to any determinate value.” (Gentleman’s Diary, 1836, pp. 25, 26.) That these propositions are fallacious, Mr. Woolhouse would, I think, have soon seen, if he had attempted their demonstra- tion, instead of contenting himself with testing their accuracy by two particular examples, which, as far as they go, seem indeed, at first sight, to corroborate their truth, although upon examination such will not be found to be the case; and if we were to interpret every vanishing fraction agreeably to this theory, we should frequently be involved in the most pal- pable errors. Indeed it is remarkable that my friend did not Mr. Woolhouse’s Theory of Vanishing Fractions. 297 reflect that 2, occurring in an analytical result, was as likely to be the symbol of absurdity, that is, of no value at all sub- sisting under the proposed conditions, as the symbol of mul- tiple values. When we are operating with equations of the first degree, containing several unknown quantities, the symbol $ is, in fact, the very form which the result usually takes when the pro- posed equations involve incompatible conditions; so that the foregoing theory would lead us to infer an unlimited variety of values, when in reality not one exists. ‘The theory which Mr. Woolhouse condemns could never lead to such absurdity. But even the examples which Mr. Woolhouse adduces do not appear to accord with the doctrine which they are intended to illustrate and enforce; nor do they furnish any ground of objection to the theory they are designed to oppose. Of these two examples the following is the one upon which, I believe, Mr. Woolhouse places the most importance. ‘¢ To find a point in the arc of an elliptic quadrant, such that, a tangent being drawn through it, the perpendicular drawn from the centre to the tangent may be a mean propor- tional between the two semiaxes a,b.” Now by putting x, y for the coordinates of the required point, we easily obtain the following equations, embodying the proposed conditions, viz. Eyed y ae 1 x y JERE cabs Tresabe hn ae ¢¢ and we find so that the coordinates of the required point are iN SH {MOTE bs, e=ay/p y= NY fs Now, although most persons would say that these results furnish al/ the values of x and y legitimately deducible from the preceding expressions for z* and y*, yet Mr. Woolhouse adds, “* When 6 = a the elliptic quadrant becomes a circular one, and these last expressions give for the position of the re- quired point x = a 3, y = a 3, or the point which bi- sects the arc of the quadrant. But in the case of the circle, it is obvious that all its points will answer the proposed con- Third Series. Vol. 8. No. 47. April 1836. aI 298 On Mr. Woolhouse’s Theory of Vanishing Fractions. dition; and if we take the expressions which are immediately deduced in the investigation, viz. a(a—b) , &(a—d) aoe? Y= ae? we see that they become vanishing fractions in the case of the circle, and do not limit the required point.” Now, I submit that the values 7 =a 4/1, y = 3, are the true, and the only values, fairly deducible from these vanishing fractions ; and that the fact of the problem admitting multiple solutions, under the proposed change of hypothesis, is altogether deduced from other, and distinct, considerations. It is, in fact, information which the analytical result is quite incompetent to supply ;- and is derivable solely from an examination, not of the conclusion, but of the original conditions of the problem. From this ex- amination it appears that, in the proposed hypothesis, the two conditions merge into one, and thus a restriction being re- moved, the problem becomes indeterminate; but the mere merging of the final result into the form 2, could never have made known this ; the information is obtained quite independ- ently of the slightest reference to this result, and from a di- rectly opposite source. It is no doubt true, that when condi- tions disappear, in certain hypotheses the results will assume the form 2, but it is not true conversely; that when the results assume the form 2, conditions must have disappeared, and thus the values of ° become innumerable, as Mr. Woolhouse contends, What would my friend say of the sum of a geo- a(r"—1), r—] his second proposition above, this sum is anything! It ap- pears to me that Mr. Woolhouse’s oversight, in his interpre- tation of ° in the foregoing problem, is analogous to that sometimes committed in physics; and which consists in taking for cause and effect, two phenomena, not invariably con- nected, yet both having a common antecedent. The very thing (viz. the hypothesis a = 5) which causes 2° to become 9, causes also, in this case, one condition to disappear; and it is thence presumed that there is an invariable connexion be- tween these two events; whereas that connexion is purely ac- cidental. Belfast, March 16, 1836. a metrical series, viz.S = when7 = 1? According to —- Lond kE iin. Pik Mag. anak Tourn, of Science. Vo tA 6 SS ee (7 [ 299 ] LXII. On the Construction of Skew Arches. By Cuartes Fox, Esq.* [With a Plate. ] atid bridges have hitherto been comparatively little used ; but since railways have been introduced, in which it is highly important to preserve as direct and straight a line as possible, they are very frequently required, as a railway passes through the various districts without the possibility of regarding the angle at which it may cross canals and roads, its course being in great measure controlled by the naturai features of the country. Wherever a canal is thus crossed at an angle, we must either divert the canal, so as to bring it at right angles to the railway; or we must build a common square bridge of suffi- cient span to allow the canal, its course being unaltered, to pass uninterruptedly under it; or we must erect a proper skew _ bridge. The first of these is often impracticable, as provisions are generally inserted in the Acts of Parliament, for preserving the canal from any alteration in its course; and even if this were not the case, the diversion of a canal causes great expense, and is attended with much inconvenience to its traffic: the se- cond is a most unscientific mode of overcoming the difficulty, and would also involve very serious expense, arising from the necessity of making use of an arch of much larger dimensions than would be required were the proper oblique arch erected initsstead. By referring to Plate III. figs. 1 and 2, this will be apparent: for this diagram I have selected the angle at which the London and Birmingham railway crosses the Grand Junc- tion Canal, being an angle of 30 degrees. It is for the above reasons that oblique arches are now so frequently erected; and a good method of building them is, therefore, of considerable importance. As many practical men with whom I am acquainted have experienced considerable difficulty in the construction of skew bridges, I was led to turn my attention to the subject ; and haye at length succeeded in rendering the principles of it easy to be understood. All persons are acquainted with the manner in which com- mon square arches are built, where all the courses are square to the face, and parallel both to the direction and surface of the road or river running under it, by which means the thrust or strain is always at right angles to the joints or beds of the * Communicated by the Author. 212 300 Mr.C. Fox on the Construction of Skew Arches. individual stones composing the arch; hence the whole thrust of ordinary arches, which is brought in upon the abutments, is exerted in the direction of the bridge itself, z. e. of the road passing over it. To devise some simple mode of setting out and working the courses of stone in a skew arch, so as to bring in the thrust in the proper direction, was the great object to be obtained. All practical men are aware of the vast difference between having to deal with straight and with twisted Jines; and the necessity of introducing twisted lines in the construction of skew bridges will soon be seen. In skew bridges, in order to keep the thrust in the proper direction, it is necessary to place the courses of stones at an angle with the abutment, whereby each stone loses its paral- lelism with the surface of the road, and is therefore laid on an inclining bed. In a common semicircular arch each course of stones is parallel with the axis of the bridge, and all the beds are wrought so as to point to the axis: the inclination of the stones varies in every course; but although the inclination of the stones varies in every course, both ends of the course have the same inclination, both ends are equally high in the arch, and both ends point to the centre. This is the case in the ordinary bridge; but in a skew bridge, as the courses run obliquely across the arch, one end of the course is necessarily higher up the arch than the other, and therefore would no longer point to the centre; but only make this point to the centre, and we immediately get the twisted form, that is, we make each bed of the courses of stones a true spiral plane. The principle which I have adopted is, to work the stones in the form of a spiral quadrilateral solid, wrapped round a cylinder, or in plainer language the principle of a square threaded screw; hence it becomes quite evident that the trans- verse sections of all these spiral stones are the same throughout the whole arch. It will be obvious that the beds of the stones should be worked into true spiral planes; but I am not aware that any rule has yet been published that would enable the stones to be wrought at the quarry into the desired form, or of any rule by which the true angle at which the courses cross the axis of the bridge is determined. Tig. 3. is a representation of the courses of the stones, each alternate course being omitted in order to show their form more distinctly; and the course forming the key-stone is carried out so as to show that it really is the thread of a square threaded screw wound round a cylinder, the cylinder being indicated by the two dotted lines. If the threads are cut at right angles to the cylinder, Mr. C. Fox on the Construction of Skew Arches. 301 the section would appear as in fig. 4; if cut at right angles to the courses, or as nearly so as the case will admit of, as they are really cut to form the face of the bridge, the section would appear as in fig. 5. In order that these principles may be understood, it is ne- cessary to have aclear idea of the nature of a spiral plane; and perhaps, the best definition of it is, to consider it as being produced by the twofold motion of the radius of a cylinder, 2. é. let a radius revolve upon its axis at an uniform velocity, and at the same time impart to it a progressive motion along the axis itself, and then by apportioning these two motions to the particular case you will obtain any spiral you may desire; hence it is apparent that the outer edge of a spiral plane is produced bya straight line wound round a cylinder every- where forming the same angle with the axis, while the inner edge actually merges into the axis itself, which of course is a straight line. The question which now naturally suggests it- self is how to decide at what angle to place these spiral stones with respect to the axis of the bridge, or in mechanical lan- guage, what traverse must we give the screw ? In entering upon the investigation of this subject, my first idea was to develop upon a plane surface all the superficies connected with a skew arch. If a semi-cylinder be cut obliquely, the section is a semi- ellipsis, and if the semi-cylinder be then unfolded, the edge of the developed ellipsis will not be a straight line but a spiral one; and some builders not being aware of this fact, have squared a course from the face of the centring, and having drawn in the remaining courses parallel with this, have taken it for granted that all the courses would be square with the face, which it will be seen is impossible by referring to the de- velopment of the intrados, or under surface of the arch, which is the development of the centring itself: they have hereby been led into very serious and perplexing difficulties. Having shown the impossibility of making all the stones square to the face, I will now give the mode of deciding in what direction they should be placed. When the soffit is developed, the edge which formed the face of the arch gives a true spiral line: my first plan was to lay the courses of stone at right angles to a line extending between the two ex- treme points of the spiral line of the developed soffit (see fig. 6); this line I shall afterwards speak of as the approxi- mate line, as it is the nearest approximation to the line of the face that can be obtained by a straight line. On further consideration I discovered a far more eligible mode of laying out the lines, 302 Mr. C. Fox on the Construction of Skew Arches. It is evident from fig. 7, that if spiral planes are considered as composed of spiral lines placed at various distances from the centre of the cylinder, each of these lines will form a different angle with the axis; and therefore, as an arch has always some thickness, that although we have the inner edge of the spiral plane placed at right angles to the thrust, yet every other portion is gradually departing from a right angle, and is, therefore, exerting its force in an improper direction: thus an arch of this description can never exert its thrust in the direction of the bridge, but is endeavouring to push the abutments obliquely. To get the thrust strictly correct, I have supposed the arch to be cut into two rings of equal thickness (see fig. 8); and having considered the external ring as removed, have pro- ceeded to develop the outside surface of the remaining one: this I shall hereafter speak of as the intermediate develop- ment, as it is the development of a surface midway between the extrados and soffit or intrados. Upon this intermediate development I place the approxi- mate line, and then draw all the courses square to it; by which means we obtain a line in the centre of each stone exerting its force in the true direction, and thus get rid of the disadvan- tage of twisted beds to the stones, as in proportion as the one half of this bed exerts its force in an oblique direction on the one hand, the other half acts in the opposite direc- tion, and is therefore always producing a balance of effect, which resolves the various forces into one exerting all its power in the true direction, which is the object to be ob- tained. Having explained the mode of setting out the beds of the stones, a little may now be said on the situation of the cross- joints: by these will be understood the joints between the va- rious stones constituting a complete course. Where an arch is built of stone throughout, the situation of these joints is of minor importance; but where stone is expen- sive, it is common to make the faces of the arch only of stone, filling in the intermediate space with brick-work; as in these instances the cross joints form the boundary between stone- and brick-work, it becomes a point of considerable importance. This is the case in the Watford viaduct; each stone here is equal in thickness to five courses of bricks, so that there are five thicknesses of mortar in the brick-work to one in the stone. Mortar always is compressed into a smaller compass when the centring is struck, and the full weight of the arch comes upon it. In consequence of this tendency, that por- tion of arches constructed of brick-work, always subsides much Mr. C. Fox on the Construction of Skew Arches. 303 more than the stone. In an arch where stone- and brick~ work are combined, little reliance should be placed on their connexion, as this is always more or less disturbed after the centring is removed, so that we should endeavour to con+ struct each portion of the arch with its bearing surfaces or beds as nearly equal as possible. In the first models the soffits of all the stones were made of an equal length, considering that this would present the best appearance; but this method rendered the bearing surfaces very unequal, as will be seen by fig. 9; the equal lengths being indicated by the dotted lines. This difficulty is overcome by this simple means: instead of having the stones of equal length on the soffit, they are made so on the intermediate development, and then the areas of the bearing surfaces or beds of the stones are all equal. See fig. 10. “Having given the mode of laying out the lines, I will now proceed to the practical part, viz. the working of the indivi- dual stones. My first idea was to commence by working the soffit; and this was the mode employed. Having obtained an elastic mould cut to the angle at which the joints of the soffit cross the axis of the bridge, the work~ man by means of this gets an oblique line on that surface of the stone which he intends for the soffit. It will be under- stood from fig. 11, that this oblique line thus obtained will be parallel with the axis of the bridge. The workman then pro- ceeds to chisel out a groove (or what is by masons called a chisel-draught) along this line, of sufficient depth for what he knows will be required for the hollowing of the stone. He then takes two wooden moulds (one of which is shown in fig. 12), which are portions of the same circle as the soffit itself. A mark being placed upon the centre of each of these moulds, the workman then proceeds to sink them into the stones at right angles to this chisel-draught, (see fig. 11,) and in such a manner that the centre marks shall be in the chisel- draught, and the upper edges of the moulds, which are straight, shall be in the same plane, or what is commonly called, out of winding. It will now be obvious that these two last grooves will form true portions of the soffit itself, and therefore, that the workman has nothing to do but to work out the remainder of the stone with a straight edge, always kept parallel with the first draught, and sunk to the bottom of the two draughts which were worked by the curved moulds. Having ob- tained this hollowed surface, an elastic mould, of the exact size of the soffit of each stone, is pressed into it, by which 304 Mr. C. Fox on the Construction of Skew Arches. the stone being marked, we obtain all the lines of the soffit itself. It will now be quite evident that the beds may be obtained by making use of a square, one limb of which shall be made to the curvature of the soffit, and the other the radius of this curve; always taking care that this square is kept at right angles to the axis, as will be seen in figures 13, 14, and 15. The first few stones were wrought in this manner; but finding it very difficult to prevent the workman from getting his soffit a little on one side, by which means he wasted much of the stone on one bed and rendered the other deficient, I had recourse to a method which I will describe. Having provided two straight edges, the one parallel and the other containing the angle of the twist, (see fig. 16,) we proceeded to work one of the beds by chiselling two draughts along the stone, so that these straight edges being kept at a proper di- stance from each other were let into the stone until they were out of winding on their upper edges. Having finished one'bed by straight edges, we then ob- tained the soffits and other beds by means of the square be- fore mentioned. By working a bed first instead of the soffit, the best will always be made of a block of stone. As we have before seen that all the stones constituting a skew arch are portions of the same square threaded screw, the workman having finished one stone has only to repeat the same operations with every other. Any stone in the face of the arch, taken from one side, and applied to the corresponding one face to face, will continue the true spiral plane: this fact enabled us to work all the stones for one bridge in pairs; that is, one stone having been wrought with the proper twist, and of sufficient length to make . two stones, was accordingly sawn in two at the proper angle: but of course this cannot be done advantageously when the stone is of a very hard nature. It has been shown that by developing all the various sur- faces, instead of having to think of complicated spiral lines, they are at once reduced to straight ones; and I will now very briefly show how simply the data necessary for the construc- tion of a skew arch may be obtained (see fig. 17). Let A represent the curvature of the intrados, and C the extrados, B being a line midway between A and C. Let DD, EE, F F represent the boundaries of three cylinders of which A, B, C are the transverse sections; let these cylinders be cut by the straight line G, H, at the angle of askew, that is, the angle formed by the two roads crossing each other ; and from the points I, J, K, draw three straight lines at right Prof. Powell on the Theory of the Dispersion of Light. 305 -angles to the axis, and of such lengths that I L shall be of equal length to the semicircle A, and J M equal to B, and KN equal to C; from the point O draw the straight line O L, and ‘also from P to M: it will be seen that O L is the approxi- mate line of the developed soffit, and P M that of the inter- mediate development. Add Q, R, and S, which are the centre lines of the three developments. It will be seen that when these developments are placed as in an arch, these three lines Q, R, S_ being parallel with the axis, will be in a plane perpendicular to the axis, and, there- fore, that all the points in each spiral will be vertical with the axis, and also with one another. Through any point in P M draw a straight line V at right angles with P M, which straight line shall extend to the axis of the cylinder. At the point where it intersects R, a line T perpendicular to the axis intersects Ralso: this last perpendicular line cuts the three lines Q, R, S at the points where the lines U, V, W, which meet in X, intersect Q, R, S. The joints are then drawn upon the three developments eee with the lines U, V, W, and at such distances that the ines Q, R, S shall be cut into equal parts. Of course, care must be taken to divide the approximate line of the soffit into a given number of stones. ‘The angle X will be that which the intrados form with the axis of the cylinder, and the angle U W will give the wind of the bed. On this principle and by the rules here given, it is nearly as easy to work the stones of a skew bridge as those of any other. Park Village East, London, March 17, 1836. LXIII. Further Observations on M. Cauchy’s Theory of the Dispersion of Light. By the Rev. Bapen PowELt, M.A., E.R.S., Savilian Professor of Geometry, Oxford. (Continued from p. 28.) I PROCEED to illustrate the further researches to which I alluded in my last paper; relative to the development of the theory of dispersion, and simplifying the process of M. Cauchy. In order to consider the subject in its simplest form, let us confine our attention to a plane wave perpendicular to the axis of z, with vibrations parallel to the axis of y. Then the displacements § and ¢ will vanish, and the differential equation 306 Prof. Powell’s further Observations on M. Cauchy’s_ of motion deduced upon M. Cauchy’s principle (in my ana- lysis, eq. (12.),) will be reduced to f (7 os? ? Fh HS { mith) 4, Ve (1.) where 7 is the value, at the time ¢, of the varying displacement of the molecule m, whose rectangular coordinates when in equilibrium are x y z34+Avy is the displacement at the same moment ¢, of another molecule m, which has for its rectangu- lar coordinates when in equilibrium rt+Ac ytAy z+Az, while r= V/ Aa’ + Ay? + Az’, or the distance between these two molecules in their positions of equilibrium; £8 is the angle between this distance r and the axis of y; and, finally, f(r) and f(7) are functions of 7, of which the former (if positive) expresses the law of attraction, or (if negative) the law of repulsion, and the latter is derived from it by the rule FitD = 7 P zr). —T(7- S, the sign ef summation, is relative to the actions (attractive or repulsive) of all the molecules m. I have recapitulated thus far in reference to what was esta- blished at the outset of M. Cauchy’s investigations. “Now this analysis is thus far devoid of all difficulty or intricacy ; the whole difficulty of the subject lies in the zntegration of these equations of motion. The integration given by M. Cauchy is of an extremely general kind: but for the purpose we have now more immediately in view, it will be readily allowed that if a particular solution were proposed, such as to include the establishment of the relation between » and A, it would suffice. A valuable instance of a method of effecting such a simplifica- tion has been laid before the readers of this Journal, in the excellent paper of Mr. Tovey in the Number for January, p. 7. But another such particular solution has been pointed out by Sir W. R. Hamilton, the nature of which I now proceed to describe ; and this will be most perspicuously done in the following manner: It will be easily seen that all the conditions of a wave for the ordinary phenomena are fulfilled by such a function as 4 = A+Bcos (<7 we-) +C sin (= (we—t)); (2) Theory of the Dispersion of Light. 307 which, merely by the assumption of the coefficients and trigo- nometrical operations, is easily put under the form 2a 7 = % +7, COS es (u2—1+ 0), (3.) t) being entirely arbitrary, and 7 4, being also arbitrary, but small ; 7) is introduced only for greater generality. Differentiating in respect of ¢, we shall have @ Qn\2 2: oy =— (=) 4, COS (= (e—t+4)). (4) Also, by the method of finite differences, we have 2 2 —2 xn, cos (= (ea—t+t) ) (sin res) Ayj= bide erure (5.) — sin (= (we—-t+t,) (sin tad hv *) a Now (on precisely the same grounds as those adverted to in the analysis of Cauchy for deducing the equations (22.),) it will be seen that this expression is of such a form that if it were introduced in a summation, since we may assume half the values of A x as positive and half as negative, the second member involving the first power of the sine of a function of A, and the first member the square, the sums of all the values in the second member will destroy each other, but not those in the first. Thus on substituting this value of A in the differential equation (12.), or that above, (1.), we shall only have to take into account the first member, multiplied by the function of (vr); and it will thus easily appear that that equation (1.) is satisfied by these values derived from the assumed equation of the wave (3.), provided we suppose (22) = 8 {2m LO + PASE (ain HAF) 1, (6, or, in other words, the equation (3.) coupled with this last condition (6.) is a particular solution of the differential equa- tion of the motion of a system of molecules (1.). But also, this equation (6.) involves the relation between r - A 1 2 and », (or between A and p, since we have — =—,) which y- ee pia? is expressed by writing, for abridgement, 308 Prof. Powell’s further Observations on M. Cauchy’s mh AX ae v f(r) +o08° BS (1), 4° — ye hfe ‘ J Mm and — 2g (though H? is not necessarily positive), which, since Qa 6 Ue a Ae will give the relation is sin 6 y? Gye id rad i, (8.) the same as that formerly deduced. Such is the outline of the simplification proposed: I have only to regret that these and the other researches connected with the same subject have not been brought before the public by the author himself in the more complete form in which he could have clothed them. But, as they are, I trustneither he nor the mathematical reader will think I have done wrong in adopting this mode of availing myself of his permission to make use of them. On the same ground I will add another brief investigation from the same source connected with the fundamental formula of dispersion. I have before observed that for low dispersive substances, at least, the simple approximate formula appears quite suffi- cient. As it may, therefore, be useful for a very large num- ber of cases, it will not be unimportant to dwell upon it, and to state a very simple practical rule resulting from it, which completely removes the difficulties of the computation as con- ducted by the methods I formerly adopted. In the first place, from the nature of the formula the fol- lowing considerations will be readily evident. Taking any two rays whose indices are » p,, and length of waves A A,,_ let us write the arc meCosd _ * = 6. Then we have sigicos ys = gm A A 7 and by the approximate formula Theory of the Dispersion of Light. 309 1 in 6 ~= (Ss ); 1 sin( bie conegn are) Then developing the sine and dividing by the arc ] 7 NS 1 — at i] cw +,&c. —--_— De cans, iy, 23ce And for a first approximation, neglecting the terms above two dimensions, this will be easily reduced to re 6? Gi78 soe sida akg By 6 6 A; whence we obtain iz. yin (1— 7) Ar.2 ‘San Hence the practical method referred to will be as follows: Let there be assumed a subsidiary arc $ such that be 6 log 6 = } log faya] + log sin 9. a, And since i. = sec® ¢, we have also log. sec. = 3} (log pw, — log p). These logarithmic formulas enable us to perform the ap- proximate calculation with the greatest ease. [ 310 ] LXIV. Proceedings of Learned Societies. GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY. Anniversary Proceedings, February 19th, 1836. FTER the usual Reports had been read, (which are printed in the “ Proceedings ” of the Society,) the President announced the award of the Wollaston Medal and Proceeds for the past year; and, in doing so, said, GENTLEMEN, You havelearnt from the Report of the Council that the Wollaston Medal has been awarded to Mr. Agassiz of Neuchatel for his work on Fossil Ichthyology, and that the sum of 25/. from the Donation Fund has been awarded by the Council to Mr. Deshayes in promo- tion of his labours in fossil conchology. I shall now proceed to re~ quest Mr. Broderip to communicate this adjudication to his friend Mr. Agassiz, and I shall deliver in charge to our Foreign Secretary, Mr. De la Beche, the sum which has been voted to Mr. Deshayes. The President then addressed Mr. Broderip in these words :-— Mr. Broprrip, I have great pleasure in requesting you to inform Mr. Agassiz, of Neuchatel, that the Council of the Geological Society have awarded the Wollaston Medal to him for his work of last year on Fossil Ich~ thyology. Ona former occasion we presented the proceeds of the Donation Fund for one year to the same distinguished naturalist, to assist him in the publication of the early part of his great work, the importance of which was then only beginning to be known to the scientific world. It will ever be a subject of gratification to us to have learnt that this small pecuniary aid was not without its influence in accelerating the publication of his ‘“ Researches on Fossil Fish,’ arriving as it did opportunely at a moment when the funds which could be appro- priated for the undertaking were nearly exhausted. Mr. Agassiz acknowledged at the time his obligation to us for a mark of sympathy and regard which he received so unexpectedly from a foreign country, and which cheered and animated him to fresh ex- ertions. You will have the kindness to acquaint him that the Council in now awarding the Medal to him, are desirous that he should possess a lasting testimony of their esteem and of the high sense which they entertain of the merit of his scientific labours. Mr. Broprrip replied,— Srr.—I accept the trust: and permit me, on the behalf of Pro- fessor Agassiz, to offer his best thanks to the Society for the seal which it has this day set on the powerful zoological lever which he has placed in the hands of Geologists. This crowning gift will be doubly precious to him when he reflects on the high character of those who have awarded it, and hears of the expressions with which you, Sir, have been pleased to accom- pany it. These, he will feel, are the incentives “ that the clear spirit do raise To spurn delights and live laborious days.” Geological Society. 811 He will look upon the illustrious head that gives dignity to the gold—upon the representation of ‘that dark eye” before whose glance, as it has been eloquently said by one of your predecessors, all false pretensions withered—and the sight will inspire him with new energies. The President then addressed Mr. De la Beche in these words :— Mr. De ta Becue, It is now my duty to deliver into your hands as Foreign Secretary of this Society the sum of 25/., and it is with great satisfaction that I request you to inform Mr. Deshayes of Paris that this portion of the proceeds of the Wollaston Donation Fund has been awarded to him by the Council for the promotion of his labours in Fossil Con- chology. I beg that you will express to Mr. Deshayes at the same time how highly we appreciate the services which he has already yendered to Geology by his description of the fossil shells of the strata above the chalk, to which he has chiefly, although not exclu- sively, devoted his attention ; and we rejoice to hear that he is now engaged in the investigation of the fossil shells of the older for- mations. We are not ignorant that he has prosecuted his scientific studies with zeal and enthusiasm under circumstances of considerable dif- ficulty ; and we trust that the notice thus taken of his labours may encourage him to persevere in devoting the powers of his mind and his great acquirements to a department of science so eminently subservient to the advancement of Geology. Mr. Dr 1a Becne on receiving the donation expressed the plea- sure which it gave him to be requested to communicate the intelli- gence to Mr. Deshayes, and the satisfaction which he felt in pub- licly avowing his approbation of the award of the Council. The following gentlemen were elected the Officers and Council for the ensuing year. Orricers.—President, Charles Lyell, jun. Esq. F.R.S. & L.S.: Vice-Presidents, Rey. William Buckland, D.D. F.R.S. Professor of Geology and Mineralogy in the University of Oxford ; Sir Philip de Malpas Grey Egerton, Bart. M.P. F.R.S. ; George Bellas Greenough, Esq. F.R.S. & L.S.; Edward Turner, M.D. F.R.S, L. & E. Professor of Chemistry in the University of London: Secretaries, William John Hamilton, Esq. ; Woodbine Parish, jun. Esq. F.R.S.: Foreign Secre- tary, Henry Thomas De la Beche, Esq. F.R.S.& L.S.: Treasurer, John Taylor, Esq. F.R.S. Counciz.—Francis Baily, Esq. F.R.S. & L.S.; William John Broderip, Esq. F.R.S. & L.S.; William Clift, Esq. F.R.S.; Sir A. Crichton, M.D, F.R.S.; William Henry Fitton, M.D. F.R.S. & L.S.; Henry Hallam, Esq. F.R.S.; Robert Hutton, Esq. ; Roderick Impey Murchison, Esq. V.P.R.S. F.L.S.; Viscount Oxmantown, F.R.S. ; John Forbes Royle, Esq. F.L.S.; Rev. Adam Sedgwick, Woodwardian Professor in the University of Cambridge, F.R.S. & L.S.; Lieut.-Col. $12 Geological Society. W. H. Sykes, F.R.S. & L.S. ; Henry Warburton, Esq. M.P. F.R.S.5 Rev. William Whewell, F.R.S.& L.S. The President subsequently delivered the following ADDRESS. GENTLEMEN, You have learnt this morning, from the annual report of the Council, that the financial affairs of the Society continue to flourish; and that since our last anniversary we have published the conclud- ing part of the third volume of our Transactions, and the first part of a fourth volume. Another part of the same volume is nearly ready, and the Council have directed their thoughts seriously to the means of preventing, in future, the accumulation of such heavy arrears of unpublished memoirs. The delays have hitherto arisen from a desire to print all papers containing original and valuable matter in the order in which they were presented; but many have been sent to us in so unfinished a state as to retard the printing of the rest, and, as the science advances rapidly, and new facts pour in daily, the authors even of the most finished memoirs soon require to make additions and corrections, and thus the evil is continually augmenting. ‘The Council have therefore resolved, for the future, to print at once those memoirs which are in the most complete state, without waiting for others which are imperfect. During the last year there have been elected into the Society 45 new members, and we have lost 4 by resignations and 12 by deaths. Among the names of the deceased Fellows I may mention those of Mr. Goodhall and Mr. Mammatt as having zealously contributed to the progress of our science. Mr. Goodhall was an active collector of British fossils, and to his labours we owe many valuable contri- butions to our museum, and the discovery of shells of new species figured in Sowerby’s Mineral Conchology. The work of Mr. Mam- matt, on the Coal-field of Ashby-de-la-Zouch, has been honourably mentioned by my predecessor Mr. Greenough, in his last anniver- sary speech. Mr. Mammatt had superintended, for more than thirty years, the working of extensive coal mines, and kept a record of the details of various sections with which he was practically acquainted. To these documents he has added several plans of remarkable faults which intersect the carboniferous strata of Leicestershire. He has shown that on one side of one of these faults the beds rise to the height of 500 feet above the corresponding beds on the other side, yet the mass of uplifted strata does not project above the gene- ral level of the country. He infers, therefore, that it has been removed by denudation, and that the wreck of it alone now: remains on the surface in the shape of sand and boulders. Mr. Conybeare has drawn similar conclusions respecting analogous phz-= nomena observed on a still greater scale in the Newcastle coal di- strict.* Whether the denudation was sudden or gradual, or whether the faults were produced at once or were the result of a series of movements, are points which the limits of this discourse will not * Report on Geology to the British Association, 1832. Geological Society. 313 allow me to discuss at present. Mr. Mammatt contends that these enormous shifts were not effected by volcanic convulsions, but simply by a quiet and uniform operation accompanying the desiccation, shrinking, and induration of dense masses of argillaceous and other rocks, an opinion which, however ingenious, seems irreconcileable with the evidence of violent disruption with which this and other coal-fields abound. Mr. Mammatt’s volume is illustrated by more than one hundred plates of fossil plants, but it is much to be re- gretted that before executing such costly illustrations the author did not obtain the assistance of a skilful botanist, who might have selected the most important and might have added descriptions, without which mere figures can scarcely ever convey accurate information. Early in the spring of last year an application was made by the Mas- ter General and Board of Ordnance to Dr. Buckland and Mr. Sedg- wick, as Professors of Geology in the Universities of Oxford and Cam- bridge, and to myself, as President of this Society, to offer our opi- nion as to the expediency of combining a geological examination of the English counties with the geographical survey now in progress. In compliance with this requisition we drew up a joint report, in which we endeavoured to state fully our opinion as to the great ad- vantages which must accrue from such an undertaking, not only as calculated to promote geological science, which would alone be a sufficient object, but also as a work of great practical utility, bear- ing on agriculture, mining, road-making, the formation of canals and rail-roads, and other branches of national industry. The enlight- ened views of the Board of Ordnance were warmly seconded by the present Chancellor of the Exchequer, and a grant was obtained from the Treasury to defray the additional expenses which will be incurred in colouring geologically the Ordnance county maps. This arrangement may justly be regarded as an economical one, as those surveyors who have cultivated geology can with small increase of labour, when exploring the minute topography of the ground, trace out the boundaries of the principal mineral groups. This end, how- ever, could only ke fully accomplished by securing the cooperation of an experienced and able geologist, who might organize and direct the operations: and I congratulate the Society that our F oreign Secretary, Mr. De Ja Beche, has been chosen to discharge an office for which he is so eminently qualified. At the same time that measures are thus in train for complet- ing a Geological Map of England on a magnificent scale, the Map of Scotland, by Dr. MacCulloch, which has been so long and im- patiently expected, is at length on the eve of publication. But at the moment when I can announce this welcome intelligence we have to deplore the sudden loss of this distinguished philosopher. The first paper in the first volume of our Transactions was from the pen of Dr. MacCulloch, and subsequent volumes contain no less than eighteen of his memoirs*. It would lead me far beyond * [Three of these papers by Dr. Macculloch will be found at large in Phil. Mag. First Series : viz. ‘¢ On the Sublimation of Silica,” in vol. lxiv. p. 441; “ On Staffa,” ibid. p. 445 ; and “ On certain Products obtained in the Di- stillation of Wood,” in vol. xlv. p. 203.] Third Series. Vol. 8..No. 47. April 1836. 2K $14 Geological Society. my present limits were I to attempt to give a general analysis of these, and of his numerous other works on geology, such as his Western Islands and his Classification of Rocks. The infiuence exerted by them on the progress of our science has been powerful and lasting, yet they have been less generally admired and studied than they deserve. Their popularity has been impaired by a want of condensation and clearness in the style, a defect which no one could more easily have remedied than the author, had he been willing to submit to the necessary labour. Another blemish has also contributed to give a repulsive character to some of his later productions, especially his System of Geology, the absence, or ap- parent absence, of all enthusiasm and love for his subject, anda disposition to neglect or speak slightingly of the labours of others, and even to treat in a tone bordering on ridicule some entire depart- ments of science connected with geology, such as the study of fossil conchology. I attribute these imperfections principally to habitual ill health acting upon a sensitive mind, for certainly, Dr. MacCul- loch’s spirits were much depressed by bodily sufferings when I had first the pleasure of knowing him, about the year 1822. His imagination was then haunted with the idea that his services in the cause of geology were undervalued, and it was in vain to com- bat this erroneous impression. After that period he almost entirely withdrew himself, even when residing in London, from all personal intercourse with the most active geologists; and to those who knew him this seclusion from scientific society was a subject of frequent regret. Having expressed myself thus unreservedly on some of the peculiarities and defects of his style, I may affirm that as an origi- nal observer Dr. MacCulloch yields to no other geologist of our times, and he is perhaps unrivalled in the wide range of subjects on which he displayed great talent and profound knowledge. For myself I may acknowledge with gratitude that I have received more instruction from his labours in geology than from those of any living writer. One of the most important communications which we have re- ceived for many years is an essay by Professor Sedgwick on the changes of structure produced in stratified rocks after their deposi- tion. Respecting the magnesian limestone, he has confirmed by new arguments the conclusions which he formerly drew, in proof that the complicated concretions of this rock have been pro- duced since the original deposition of the beds. But the principal part of his memoir is devoted to the description of the cleavage or slaty structure of rocks, and those partings which have been called joints. The author first shows the analogy of the Cumbrian zone of green slate and porphyry with the structure of the principal chain of North Wales. In these regions, as in part of the slaty series of Westmoreland and Lancashire, occur many beds exhibiting a slaty cleavage, which the Professor distinguishes from a jointed structure. Joints, he says, are fissures placed at definite distances from each other, the masses of intervening rock having no tendency to cleave in a direction parallel to such fissures: whereas in the planes of cleavage, the rock is capable of indefinite subdivision in a direction Geological Society. 315 parallel to such planes. The planes of stratification, on the other hand, are perfectly distinct from both, and throughout the district alluded to have never been found to coincide with the lines of cleav- age, dipping sometimes to the same point and sometimes to opposite points of the compass, but being always inclined to them at an angle of from 10° to 30° or 40°, and inno instance at 90°. There are re- gions in North and South Wales thirty miles in extent, and many miles in breadth, where the cleavage planes preserve an undeviating dip and direction notwithstanding that they traverse strata which are greatly contorted. — In that variety of slate-rock which is used for roofing, all traces of original deposition or stratification are often obliterated ; yet in many quarries, a number of parallel stripes are discovered, sometimes of a lighter and sometimes of a darker colour than the general mass. These stripes, says the Professor, are universally parallel to the true beds, whenever such beds can be discovered, whether by or- ganic remains, by the alternations of similar deposits, or other ordinary means. Many of these beds are of a coarse mechanical structure, others are fine chloritic slate; but the coarser beds and the finer, the twisted and the straight, have all been subjected to one change, a crystalline cleavage passing alike through all. Some of the sections given show the cleavage planes preserving an almost geometrical parallelism while they pass through curved strata, of which the sedimentary origin is obvious. In another place it is said that where the slaty cleavage is very perfectly brought out the rocks always make an approach to homogeneity, but where the coarse beds predominate the slaty structure almost entirely dis- appears. Dr. Boase in his comments on these passages has re- marked that they seem inconsistent with each other, and I confess that at first they struck me in the same light ; but the Professor has explained to me that although the coarse beds are not slaty, they have a grain parallel to the cleavage planes of the finer beds, this grain being exhibited when they are struck with the hammer; and it is only when the materials of the beds are very coarse that the cleavage planes entirely vanish. : In regard to the origin of these phenomena, the author supposes that crystalline or polar forces must have acted on the whole mass simultaneously in given directions, and that the action being carried on at once through a very large mass of matter may have acquired an accumulated intensity of crystalline action in each part, so that the whole intensity of crystalline force, modifying the mass, may not have been equal to the sum of the forces necessary to crys stallize each part independently, but may have been some function of that sum whereby it may have been increased almost indefinitely. I regret that I have not space to do justice to this ingenious speculation, nor have I yet had sufficient opportunities of obser- vation to know whether we shall be able to distinguish generally, with precision, those slates which are diagonal to the strata, from those flagstone-slates, as it is proposed to term them, which are pa- rallel to the layers of deposition. Pe the lastsummer I observed 2K 2 316 Geological Society. in the Swiss Alps that the fissile roofing-slate and drawing-slate of the Niesen, in the Canton of Berne, divides into extremely thin la- minz, which are parallel to the true planes of stratification. The direction of the beds is shown by alternations of coarse and clearly mechanical strata of a kind of greywacke, the whole series belong- ing to the Green Sand or fucoid grit formation. Ifit be said that these slates may owe their laminated texture to extremely minute flakes of tale, mica, or some other foliated mineral which may have fallen as sediment and have been all deposited on their flat surfaces, I reply, that in that case they would exemplify the exact similarity of certain acknowledged slates of deposition to others which have originated in crystalline forces independent of sedimentary action. Mr. Murchison, after confirming the truth of the Professor’s obser- vations as applied to all those regions of Wales which have come within his survey, has pointed out what might by some be considered an exception to the rule in a part of the slate-rocks of Pembroke- shire, where the planes of slaty cleavage are coincident with the true lamin, as proved by colour and the alternation of various layers of deposit. Mr. Murchison states, however, that although these rocks are quarried as roofing-slates, and are a part of the older system, they may be classed by Mr. Sedgwick as fine flagstones. Some confusion will, I fear, arise from attempting to restrict the term slate to those cases alone where the cleavage is oblique to the stratification ; but whatever nomenclature we adopt, it is clear from the excellent paper of the Professor, that three distinct forms of structure are exhibited in certain rocks throughout large districts : namely, first, stratification ; secondly, joints; and thirdly, slaty cleavage; the last having no connexion with true bedding, and being superinduced by a cause absolutely independent of gravita- tion. These different structures must have different names, even though there may be cases, and I believe there will be many, where it is impossible, after carefully studying the phaenomena, to decide upon the class to which they belong. One curious consequence, but slightly alluded to by the author, ap- pears to follow from the facts described, namely, that the slaty struc- ture must have commenced at a period posterior to the last series of violent movements which dislocated the strata and threw them into anticlinal and synclinal lines. Such disturbances would have de- ranged the parallelism of the cleavage planes. If, therefore, there are proofs, as I believe there are, of the elevation or subsidence of these rocks since they assumed the slaty structure, the whole country must have been moved bodily, or the separate masses, if they changed their relative position, must have moved in such directions as to allow the dip of the cleavage planes to remain un- altered. It is with pleasure that I next call your attention to the investi- gations which Mr. Murchison has been steadily pursuing in the older fossiliferous rocks of Wales and the bordering counties of England. He has at length brought his survey of five years to a successful termination; and his work will form a most important Geological Society. 317 step in the progress of geological science, not merely as elucidating the history of a portion of the sedimentary formations of our island, but as fixing the characters of a succession of normal groups to which the strata of other parts of Europe, and perhaps of America, may be referred. A large and beautifully illustrated treatise, in which he intends to give a detailed description of his original ob- servations and views, will soon be published. In the mean time we have tasted, as it were by anticipation, the fruits of his labours, having, year after year, received at our meetings the earliest intel- ligence of his discoveries, and having freely discussed and criticized them long before it has been possible for him to lay the whole in a matured and digested form before the public. You are aware that the system of rocks, which have been the chief object of his re- search, constitutes the upper part of what was formerly called the transition or greywacke series. In these strata, which had previ- ously remained in a state of obscurity and confusion, he has distin- guished several formations. The old red sandstone rests conform- ably on the uppermost of these, while the lowest of them repose both conformably and unconformably on the ancient slate-rocks of Wales. Mr. Murchison proposes the general name of “ Silurian” for this whole system, as the strata may best be studied in those parts of England and Wales once occupied by the ancient British nation the Silures. The necessity of a new term has arisen from the uncertain lati- tude with which the word “transition ” had been applied, some au- thors including in it the carboniferous rocks, and also from the still greater confusion introduced by the word “ greywacke,” a term which can only be employed conveniently, in a mineralogical sense, to designate a peculiar kind of rock which has been formed at many successive epochs. Thus, for example, in the memoir now under review, it is shown that in Pembrokeshire grits, which have passed for greywacke, occur in the true coal-measures, in the old red sand- stone, in the Silurian, and in the still older systems of rock. Below the Silurian strata are slate-rocks of older date, in which traces of organic remains have been again detected ; and Professor Sedgwick has suggested the name of Cambrian for this more ancient system, which is conterminous over a wide territory with the Silu- rian formations, the relative position of both being clearly seen. Mr. Murchison has recently traced the Silurian system running in zones through Pembrokeshire, and there rising out in the coast cliffs from beneath the old red sandstone as conformably as in the interior of the country,—an important verification of the accuracy of his previous determinations. Great lithological changes are, how- ever, observed to take place in these localities, so distant from the best types of the system; thus, the “ Ludlow and Wenlock” formations are no longer distinctly separated by subordinate limestones, and are therefore simply termed the ‘ upper Silurian rocks,” and these, changing their soft argillaceous characters of “ mudstone,” become hard sandstones, yet contain some well-known organic remains ; whilst the lower Silurian rocks, or Caradoc and Llandeilo formations, not only maintain their usual fossil distinctions, but exhibit lime- 318 Geological Society. stones of much greater thickness than in any other part of their course. Mr. Murchison has also shown that rocks oceupying a large coast tract in Pembrokeshire, which from their mineral aspect had been laid down as “greywacke”, consist of true coal-measures. After noticing a ridge of intrusive rocks in Caermarthenshire, be- tween the Towey and the Taf, as connected with certain great lines of dislocation, he points out, in the Cambrian System of Pembroke- shire, examples of the existence of two classes of trap rock, one bedded or contemporaneous, the other amorphous and of posterior intrusion. He further shows that the main directions of the stra- tified deposits of this county are parallel to divergent zones of trap. In another paper the same author states that he has lately disco- vered to the north-west of Shrewsbury, proofs of an eruption of trap posterior to the new red sandstone, and probably to the lias. This line of fissure along which he has observed the new red sand- stone affected for a distance of thirty miles is on the precise pro- longation of a linear eruption in the Breiddin Hills, which he had previously pointed out as having been in progress during and after the epoch of the deposition of the Silurian strata. The more modern trap is made up of a peculiar felspathic rock identical with some of these at the great vent of eruption fifteen miles distant, where they both alternate with and are intruded into the more ancient deposits. It appears from these observations that volcanic operations were renewed along the same line after a wide interval of time, showing that we must be on our guard against inferring the synchronism of coincident lines of derangement. The repetition also in the same spot and at two distant periods of a trap identical in mineral cha- racter is curious, and reminds me of an opinion lately mentioned to me by Mr. Von Buch, that the composition of lava is often deter- mined by that of preexisting volcanic rocks near the point of erup- tion. Thus on two opposite sides of the same volcano, as on Tene- riffe for example, a trachytic flow of lava will issue from a mass of trachyte, and a basaltic flow from rocks of basalt. Mr. De la Beche has shown that the trappean rocks are associated in such a manner with the new red sandstone of part of Devonshire,— among other places, near Tiverton and Exeter,—as to indicate that the trap and the sandstone were each in the course of formation at the same period. Some beds of sand present every appearance of hav- ing been of volcanic origin, and ejected from a crater, but the sand became mixed with common detrital matter then in process of de~ position at the bottom of the sea. Numerous angular fragments, some of them even one or two tons in weight, of quartziferous por- phyry with a felspathie base, are intermingled with the conglome~ rates of the old red sandstone, and do not resemble any trappean rocks discovered in place in this district. Mr. De la Beche conjec- tures with much probability that these fragments were ejected from volcanic vents, and that they fell upon the sand and pebbles then in the course of deposition around such vents, and were thus included. The author has not failed to show that the original features of the Geological Society. 319 bed of the sea, of the period of eruption alluded to, have been obli- terated by subsequent denudation; and I may suggest that this cause has often prevented geologists from recognising the analogy of trappean phzenomena to those of submarine and insular volcanos now active *. In another communication Mr. De la Beche informs us that the “ Cornish grauwacké,” in which term he here comprises the slates of that country and their associated sandstones and conglomerates, contains in some places organic remains. Specimens of these fos- sils have been presented by him to our museum. He also states that this greywacke formation, which extends into Somerset and Devon, is older than Mr. Murchison’s Silurian system, and may be subdivided into natural sections, coinciding perhaps with some ob- served by Professor Sedgwick in the Cambrian group. ‘The slates of Tintagel, long since known to be fossiliferous, belong to the same age as this greywacke of Cornwall. A joint paper by Professor Sedgwick and Mr. Williamson Peile has made us acquainted with the carboniferous limestone flanking the primary Cumbrian mountains, and with the coal-fields of the north-west coast of Cumberland. These carboniferous strata rest unconformably on the primary Cumbrian slates. The carboniferous series is divided into four groups: Ist, The great scar limestone; 2nd, Alternations of limestone, shale, and coal; 3rd, Millstone grit; 4th, Great upper coal formation. It appears that the struc- ture of the carboniferous limestone is nearly the same as that of the Yorkshire chain so admirably described by Professor Sedgwick in the first part of our fourth volume just published. Mr. Griffith, who has for so many years been preparing a geologi- cal map of Ireland, has described to us the position of some veins of syenite which traverse the mica-slate and chalk near Fair Head in the county of Antrim. The syenite is composed of dark green erystal- lized hornblende and brownish red felspar, with occasional grains of quartz ; and the chief point of interest consists in the circumstance that the syenitic veins have the appearance in general of being regu- lar beds in the mica-slate, being for the most part conformable both in strike and dip. They are found, however, when more closely examined and traced for some distance, to deviate from the strati- fication of the mica-slate, and to have an indented and saw-like edge at their junction. Similar syenitic veins also penetrate through the chalk in the neighbouring part of the coast, and near their contact with the chalk nodules or spheroidal masses of syenite are occa sionally observed so isolated and surrounded by chalk that had not the intruding veins clearly proved its posteriority, the syenite might be mistaken for the older rock, rounded fragments of which had been imbedded in the calcareous stratum. These phanomena remind us of the isolated nodules of granite which in Cornwall, the Valorsine, and other countries, occur in the immediate vicinity of granite veins. * (See on this subject Lond. and Edinb. Phil. Mazg., vol. vii. p. 515.] 320 Geological Society. I have next to call your attention to an able sketch of the geo- logy of Denmark, which you will find at some length in our Pro- ceedings, from the pen of an eminent Danish naturalist, Dr. Beck, of Copenhagen. He describes in Bornholm, besides the granitic and Silurian rocks, certain strata which appear to agree with our Weal- den group in mineral character and fossil plants, some of these being the same as those found in the Hastings sands, although the shells are marine. In Bornholm this formation is characterized by containing coal. The most remarkable feature in the geology of Denmark Proper is the great development of the cretaceous system above the white chalk with nodular flints. In the island of See- land the ordinary white chalk is covered with a hard yellowish limestone containing some fossils of the white chalk and others peculiar to itself, especially univalves of the genera Trochus, Fusus, Voluta, Oliva, Cyprzea, and Nautilus. At Faxoe this rock consists of an aggregate of corals of unknown depth, but certainly more than forty feet thick. When I myself visited the Faxoe quarries in 1834 in company with Dr. Forchhammer, the rock struck me as agreeing with the description usually given of the limestone in re- cent coral reefs. The fossil zoophytes of Faxoe are often cemented together by white chalk, which may recall to your recollection the recent chalk which Lieut. Nelson has presented to our museum from the coral reefs of the Bermudas. This recent substance is not distinguishable from some of the white marking chalk of En- gland, and like it is composed of pure carbonate of lime. It is in fact a white earthy mud, known to be derived from the decomposi- tion of the softer corallines, such as Eschara, Flustra, and Celle- pora. These observations support an opinion which has long been entertained by some geologists that all chalk may be derived from the decomposition of shells and zoophytes. While on this subject I may mention a discovery made by Mr. Lonsdale during the last summer, and which he has permitted me to announce. In arranging our collection he has found that our common white chalk, especially the upper portion of it, taken from different parts of England, (Portsmouth and Brighton among others, ) is full of minute corals, foraminifera, and valves of a small ento< mostracous animal resembling the Cytherina of Lamarck. From a pound of chalk he has procured, in some cases, at least a thou- sand of these fossil bodies. They appear to the eye like white grains of chalk, but when examined by the lens are seen to be fossils in a beautiful state of preservation. According to Dr. Beck there is a whitish and hard chalk above the Faxoe beds almost entirely made up of pulverized zoophytes including bivalves and Echini, chiefly of the same species as those of the white chalk with flints, and with corals like those of Faxoe. There are layers of flint or chert in this upper division. These conclusions, drawn from a careful examination of an extensive series of the Danish fossils, are very important, for it was formerly ima~ gined by Dr. Forchhammer that the Faxoe beds and the overlying chalk belonged to the calcaire grossier, an idea suggested by the Geological Society. 321 generic resemblance of the shells to those of the tertiary deposits. But none of the species, according to Dr. Beck, agree with any known tertiary fossils, and the secondary genera Ammonite and Baculite occur among the Faxoe shells. Some of the Faxoe corals agree with those of Maestricht, and the newest of the cretaceous for- mations of Seeland and Jutland agree more nearly with those com- monly called the Maestricht beds than with any previously known. Dr. Beck, however, says that the organic remains differ on the whole from those of Maestricht, and are more analogous to those found at Kinruth near Liege.* The cliffs of Méen, one of the Danish islands, are composed of white chalk with nodular flints. The fossils agree with those of the chalk of England and France, as was shown in the year 1827 by the list of more than one hundred species of them given by Dr. Beck in Leonhard’s Taschenbuch der Mineralogie. ‘Two years before, Dr. Forchhammer had published in the Transactions of the Royal Danish Academy his opinion respecting Méen, and extracts from his paper afterwards appeared in the Edinburgh Journal of Science for July 1828. He then considered the Méen chalk to be an integral part of the same tertiary deposit of sand and clay which contains erratic blocks in Denmark; and in confirmation of this opinion he gave sections representing an alternation of chalk with beds of tertiary sand, clay, and loam. Being desirous of inquiring into this singular phenomenon I visited the Méen cliffs in company with Dr. Forch- hammer in 1834, and came to a different conclusion. I have explained to the Society my reasons for inferring that the association of the cretaceous and tertiary deposits may be referred to the violent dis- turbances which the chalk strata have undergone. The cretaceous beds are curved, vertical, or shifted, and, upon the whole, more de- ranged than the chalk in Purbeck or the Isle of Wight. In fact the movements have been on so great a scale that masses of the overlying clay and sand have subsided bodily into large fissures and chasms, intersecting the chalk to the depth of several hundred feet. Some of the intercalations of clay and sand in the midst of great masses of unconformable chalk can only, I think, be explained by supposing engulfments of superincumbent matter, such as are described to occur during earthquakes. These appearances are analogous to those exhibited by masses of chalk nearly enveloped in crag near Trimmingham in Norfolk, although the Danish phe- nomena are on a much grander scale. Dr. Forchhammer did not fully concur in these opinions in 1834, but he appears to have since adopted them for the most part, in an excellent memoir on the geo- logy of Denmark, a copy of which has been lately sent by him to the Society, accompanied by a small coloured map of the whole of Denmark and Bornholm. As the fossils of the upper cretaceous series of Denmark are very peculiar, and of so much interest from their position, I have plea- sure in stating that figures and descriptions of them are in the course of publication by Dr. Beck, and I may add that we owe this work * On this subject see Lond, and Edinb. Phil. Mag., vol. vii. p. 413, note.) $22 Geological Society. to the liberality and the zealous interest taken in our science by an illustrious member of our Society, the Crown Prince of Denmark, The collection of recent shells formed by His Royal Highness and now in his private cabinet,—more extensive perhaps than any other in Europe,—has afforded Dr. Beck the most ample facilities of com- paring fossil and recent shells, and from the opportunities thus en- joyed we may look, at no distant period, for results which will ma- terially advance the general progress of fossil conchology.* Few communications have excited more interest in the Society than the letters on South America addressed by Mr. Charles Darwin to Professor Henslow. Mr. Darwin has devoted four years, from 1832 to 1835 inclusive, to the investigation of the natural history and geology of South America. From the position of the tertiary deposits which exist on both sides of the southern Andes, he con- cludes that. the primary chain must have had a great elevation an- terior to the tertiary period. A transverse section from Rio Santa Cruz to the base of the Cordilleras, and another on the Rio Negro exhibit the structure of what Mr. Darwin calls the great southern tertiary formations of Patagonia, which may be separated into groups of distinct periods analogous to those already established in Europe, The lowest group is of great extent and thickness, and in one in- stance was observed to alternate with a bed of ancient lava, which seemed to mark the commencement of the eruptions from the cra- ters of the principal chain of the Andes. Among the shells and corals, even of this lowest deposit, are some which are supposed to belong to species now living in the neighbouring Pacific. Over- lying this is a stratum of rolled porphyry pebbles, which the author traced for 700 miles. Scattered over the whole, and at various heights above the sea, from 1300 feet downwards, are recent shells of littoral species of the neighbouring coast, so that every part of the surface seems once to have been a shore, and Mr. Darwin supposes that an upheaval to the amount of 1300 feet has been owing to a succession of small elevations, like those experienced in modern times in Chili. The principal section described is one transverse to the Andes, extending from Valparaiso to Mendoza. The Cordillera consists here of two separate and parallel chains, the western being com- posed of stratified sedimentary rocks resting on granite. The strata are violently dislocated and contorted along parallel north and south lines, and become crystalline as they approach the gra- * Having been led to speak of cretaceous fossils, I may state that it has been a question whether certain fossils found in the English chalk, and called by Mr. Mantell Hippurites Mortoni, are truly referrible to the genus Hippurite. When I first saw one of these fossils in the collection of Mr. Robert Hudson, I conjectured that it might belong to the family of Conia and Balanus ; but I regret that this opinion has been published as mine in Loudon’s Magazine, as it was abandoned by me as soon as I had opportu- nities of minutely examining the specimens. (See Loudon’s Mag., No. 58.) Without being able to decide whether they are truly Hippurites, I may state that I believe them to belong to the family of Rudistes of Lamarck, and that they are not allied to Conia. Geological Society. 323 nite. Some of the slates and limestones, probably referable to the transition period, contain organic remains at an elevation of 13,000 feet above the sea. In the eastern chain are sandstones and conglo- merates, and associated felspathic rocks regularly bedded, and more recent than the rocks of the western chain, being partly made up of their debris. After much investigation Mr. Darwin convinced him- self that these were of the same age with certain tertiary deposits of Patagonia, Chiloe, and Conception, resembling them in mineral cha= racter and in the lignite and fossil wood which they contain. In one escarpment is seen a sandstone of this system in which there is a wood of petrified trees in a vertical position, some of the trees being perfectly silicified and of dicotyledonous wood, others con- ‘sisting of snow-white columns. of coarsely crystallized carbonate of lime. They appear to have formed a clump of trees which had grown on lava and was then submerged, so that layers of fine sand stone were quietly deposited between the trunks. The enveloping sandstone rests on lava, and is again covered by a bed of black au- gitic lava about 1000 feet thick. Over this there are at least five other grand alternations of similar rocks and aqueous deposits, amounting in thickness to several thousand feet. The same sedi- mentary strata, or the continuation of them, are not only altered by granite, but are traversed by dikes of granite proceeding from the mass, and also by numerous metallic veins of iron, copper, arsenic, silver, and gold, all of which can be traced to the underlying gra- nite. A gold mine has been worked close to the clump of silicified trees. From these observations I am led to suspect that, as in some parts of the Alps, the metamorphic structure has been assumed by strata high up in the secondary series, so in the Andes the same structure has been superinduced on certain tertiary deposits which have been also penetrated by granitic and by metalliferous veins. Dr. Daubeny has analysed a new thermal spring discovered near the town of Torre del Annunziata in the Bay of Naples, and he re- fers the origin of nitrogen gas in this and other springs in the vol- canic region of Naples and Mount Vultur to a process of subterra- nean oxygenation analogous to combustion. In the excavations made in voleanic tuff and lava near Torre del Annunziata for gain- ing access to the spring, vestiges of walls and buildings with fresco paintings, and other traces of human art were discovered, and vege= table mould containing the stems of reeds, similar to those now growing in the neighbourhood, and a fir and cypress tree in an up- right position. The buildings must have been overwhelmed before the soil existed on which the fir and the cypress grew, as this soil was formed upon the materials which enveloped the town. Mr.H. E. Strickland and Mr. Hamilton have examined a cavity be- low the level of the sea in Cephalonia adjoining the coast, into which a constant stream of sea water is flowing, and has been flowing for years. This singular phenomenon had previously attracted the at- tention of Mr. Martin and of Lord Nugent and others, some of whom had speculated, like Mr. Strickland, on the probability of the $24 Geological Society. water thus descending through crevices being converted into va- pour in subterranean hollows, and then carried off in other direc- tions in the form of stufas or hot springs. I forbear to enlarge on this subject at present, as a description of the facts drawn up by Mr. Mar- tin before Mr. Strickland’s visit, will shortly be read to the Society. We have received from Capt. Belcher a suite of geological spe- cimens from various parts of the west coast of Africa, with remarks on the reefs and sand-banks of that coast; and a collection from the Rev. W. Hennah of recent calcareous limestone and volcanic pro- ducts from the island of Ascension. I shall next consider some papers relating more or less exclusively to fossil zoology, which have been read at our meetings during the last session. We are indebted to Mr. Broderip for a description of some new species of fossil Crustacea and Echinodermata, which were discovered by Lord Cole and Sir P. Egerton in the lias of Lyme Regis. One of these crustaceans belongs to a genus intermediate between the Palinurus and the Shrimp. It is of a gigantic size compared to any recent species, and belongs to a division of which the living types have been only met with in the arctic regions. Sir P. Egerton has described some peculiarities of structure in the occipital bone of an Ichthyosaurus, observed in the skeleton of a new and gigantic species recently discovered by Miss Anning at Lyme Regis. He also states that the axis and atlas in this genus are usually found adhering firmly together, and they are connected by an auxiliary bone, showing that strength rather than freedom of lateral motion was required in the neck of these animals. These observations have been confirmed by Mr. Owen and Mr. Clift. It has often been a question whether the bones of birds had ever occurred in strata below the chalk, some of the thin fragile bones found at Stonesfield, and formerly considered to be those of birds, having been ascertained to belong to Pterodactyls. In order to elucidate this point, Mr. Mantell lately placed all his specimens from the Wealden, supposed to be those of certain Grallz, or waders, in the hands of Mr. Owen, and the result of his examination has con- firmed Cuvier’s opinion that they are true ornitholites. They seem, therefore, to be the oldest authenticated fossils of this class hitherto found in Great Britain. The rarity of such remains in geological formations, especially in the marine, cannot surprise us; for in the recent shell marl of Scotland, formed in lakes much frequented by water-fowl up to the moment of their drainage, no bones of birds have as yet been detected amongst the numerous relics of deer, ox, pig, and other quadrupeds occurring in the marl. Mr. Darwin, in his travels in South America before alluded to, found, in crossing the continent from the Rio Negro to Buenos Ayres, many large bones of Mastodons, and other remains of the Mastodon at Port St. Julian, 50° S, lat., at a distance of more than six hundred miles from the former. He also saw, in the gravel of Patagonia, many bones of the Megatherium, and among the remains of five or six species of quadrupeds associated with them, he detected those of a species of Agouti. Geological Society. 325 Our museum has just been enriched by a truly magnificent present of fossil bones from India, more valuable than any which have reached England since those obtained by Mr. Crawfurd and Dr. Wallich from Ava. They were collected and presented to us bya gentleman whom we last year elected a Fellow of this Society, Capt. Cautley of the Bengal Artillery, and their existence seems to have been first distinctly recog- nised by Dr. Falconer, superintendent of the Botanic Garden at Saha- runpore. These organic remains come from the range of hills for- merly called Sewalik, which skirt the base of the Himalayan mountains from the Ganges to the Sutluj rivers, or from north lat. 30° to 31°. They abound in part of the range to the westward of the Jumna river, and belong to the genera Mastodon, Elephant, Hippopotamus, Rhi- noceros, Hog, Anthracotherium, Horse, Ox, Deer, Antelope, Ca- nis, Felis, Gavial, Crocodile, Emys, Trionyx, besides fish and shells. Among the fossils there are some considered to be new genera, and one which Messrs. Cautley and Falconer have called Sevatherium. We have also received a splendid collection of specimens of rocks from the Himalayas, illustrating the two sections published by Mr. Royle in his work on these mountains, from the plains to the snowy passes, and his section across the central range of India. Several new facts have been brought to light in fossil ichthyo- logy during the last year. Sir P. Egerton has found in the coal- field of North Staffordshire, among other remains of fish, some scales of the Megalichthys, that large sauroidal fish first described by Dr. Hibbert as occurring at Burdiehouse, near -Edinburgh. I have lately seen a large tooth of this fish in a mass of Cannel coal found in Fifeshire by Mr. Horner and described by him in a paper read before the Royal Society of Edinburgh. It will be remem- bered that these teeth were formerly referred to saurians, to which, in fact, the Megalichthys had a much nearer affinity, according to Mr. Agassiz, than has any fish now living. Sir P. Egerton has also published a catalogue of the fossil fish in his cabinet at Oulton Park, and in that of Lord Cole, at Florence Court; two collections which are described by Mr. Agassiz as unrivalled in England in this de- partment of organic remains, and only equalled by two others in the rest of Europe, that of Count Munster, at Baireuth in Bavaria, and that of the Royal Museum of Paris*. In this catalogue Sir Philip has given the names and loealities of about 200 ichthyolites, British and foreign, and has indicated the geological position of each. Remains of fishes have been found by Mr. Prestwich in a formae tion of sandstone and red conglomerate which overlies the old red sandstone in Banffshire. He supposes the deposit to be of the age of the coal-measures, an opinion which is in accordance with the characters of the ichthyolites as determined by Mr. Agassiz. One of the most perplexing enigmas in paleontology has lately been solved by Dr. Buckland, who has discovered that some cu- rious fossils of the oolitic and cretaceous strata, which had long * Agassiz, Poiss. [oss., 4me livr. p. 45. 326 Geological Society. baffled the skill of comparative anatomists, are in fact the upper and lower jaws of extinct species of Chimera, a rare genus of living fish. These fossils had been found by Sir P. Egerton in the Kimmeridge clay, by Mr. Townsend in the Portland stone, and by Mr. Mantell in the chalk. They belong to four distinct species, of which the characters are given by Mr. Agassiz. The scientific world is indebted to the splendid museum of comparative ana- tomy at Leyden for the opportunities enjoyed by Dr. Buckland of comparing the skeleton of the recent Chimera with the fossils alluded to. Mr. Agassiz has described two very singular genera of fossil fish from the lias, one of which has been known under the name of Squalo-raia from Lyme Regis; the other from Whitby, called Gy- rostris mirabilis, probably the largest known fish. Hitherto the new red sandstone in Great Britain had been desti- tute of all organic remains, but some distinct impressions of fish of the genus Paleoniscus, 4g., have now been observed in this for- mation near Dungannon in Ireland. The geological position of these has been pointed out by Mr. Murchison, and a slab of sandstone presented to the Society by Mr. Greer exhibits on a single surface only two feet square, impressions of about 250 fishes. I have already had occasion to allude more than once to the name of Agassiz, on whom the Council have this day conferred the Wollaston Medal. I may say with pleasure, that in his second visit to England, as in that of the preceding year, he has given an impulse to the study of fossil remains in various departments which will long be felt in this country. It is not merely sound knowledge which he has freely communicated to all who have enjoyed his so- ciety, but what is even of more lasting profit, a generous enthusiasm for the study of every department of natural history and particularly of fossils. The great work on which he is now engaged yields not in importance to any that has ever been undertaken for the illustra- tion of organic remains, and the progress which he has already made at so early an age, holds out the most encouraging prospects of his future success. When we consider the strong ties of affinity which unite together all animals of the vertebrate classes, and reflect that man himself, viewed in reference to his organization, belongs to this great divi- sion of the animal kingdom, we cannot but feel the highest interest in tracing the remains of the vertebrate animals through geological formations of every age, from the newest to the most ancient. Ina small part of Europe alone more than 800 species of ichthyolites have already been determined. They are distributed through strata of all epochs; no less than 54 species have already been discovered in the carboniferous rocks, and five or six have been met with in the still older Silurian formations. The museums of Great Britain alone have afforded to Mr. Agassiz no less than 300 new species of ichthyolites, 50 of which have been added since our last anniversary. He had previously pointed out as a general law that particular generic types are strictly confined Geological Society. 327 to certain groups of strata, and it is remarkable that so vast an accession of new species offers but few exceptions to the rule. In the chalk two species have come to light belonging to genera before observed in the oolitic series only, and a distinct species of one of these genera extends even into the lower or Eocene tertiary deposits. The labours of Mr. Charlesworth have thrown much light on the structure of the crag of Suffolk and Essex, and on the fossils of that deposit. He proposes to divide the crag into the upper or red crag, and the lower or coralline crag, the last of which consists for the most part of calcareous sand, derived chiefly from the decom- position of zoophytes and shells, and in which many very perfect corals and testacea are preserved. Among other places this coral- line crag may be well examined at Tattingstone, Ramsholt, Orford, and Aldborough. It is now many years since Mr. Wood, of Hes- kerton in Suffolk, formed a large collection of crag fossils, amount- ing in number to no less than 450 species of the classes Annulata, Cirrhipeda, Conchifera, and Mollusca. Out of 370 species of shells found in the lower crag, Mr. Wood identifies 150 with those found in the red crag. Of these 150 species, common to the two deposits, Mr. Charlesworth suggests that many may have belonged to the lower bed and have been washed into the newer one, in the same manner as some fossil shells of the chalk have been evidently im- bedded in the crag*. Such accidental mixtures have doubtless occurred, and they have been occasionally remarked by geologists in other places under analogous circumstances. But I continue to believe that these upper and lower divisions of the crag should be referred to the same geological period. The determination of that period or the exact place which the crag should occupy in the chronological series of European strata is a more difficult question. When I first sub- mitted 111 species of crag shells to the examination of M. Deshayes, he was of opinion that 66 of them were extinct, and that the others belonged to recent species now inhabitants of the Germian Ocean. I lately laid before him 60 species from the coralline crag with which Mr. Charlesworth had favoured me, and he was still of opinion that the proportion of recent species was equally great. But I should add that the suites of individuals of each species were not so full and complete as might have been desired, to enable these identifications to be placed beyond all doubt. Dr. Beck has lately seen 260 species of crag shells in Mr. Charlesworth’s ca- binet in London, and informs me, that although a large proportion of the species approach very near to others which now live in our nor- thern seas, he regards them as almost all of distinct species,.and un- known as living. Both he and M. Deshayes have declared the shells to be those of a northern climate, and according to Dr. Beck the climate may even have resembled that of our arctic regions. * [See Mr. Charlesworth’s paper on the Crag, in L. and E. Phil, Mag. vol. vii. p. 81; also p, 413, note, and p, 464 of the same volume. ] 328 Geological Society. In regard to the discordance in the results at which these eminent conchologists have arrived, it may arise not only from the unequal: opportunities which they have enjoyed of examining the necessary data, but also, in part, to the different estimate which they have formed of the amount of variation necessary to constitute a distinct species. One example will sufficiently illustrate my meaning. Those naturalists who agree with M. Deshayes in referring all the living varieties of Lucina divaricata brought from different countries to one and the same species, will identify many more fossils with re- cent shells than those who agree with Dr. Beck in dividing the same recent individuals of Lucina divaricata into six or eight di- stinct species. Provided, however, each zoologist is consistent with himself, and provided the distinctive characters relied on as specific by each are commensurate one with another, no confusion will arise. In reviewing the proceedings of the Society during the last year, I find that the remaining memoirs, numerous as they are, may be all referred to one great class of subjects, for they either relate to changes now going on upon the surface of the earth as attested by man, or to geological proofs of similar changes since the rivers, lakes, and seas were inhabited by the existing species of testacea. Under these heads I shall be led to consider the effects of modern earth- quakes in upheaving and depressing the land; the gradual rising of land in one region and the lowering of its level in another; the rolling in of great waves of the sea upon the coast during earthquakes ; the transportation of rocks by floating ice; the signs of upraised beaches containing marine shells ; erratic blocks ; alluvial deposits of different ages; and other kindred topics on which a variety of new facts have been collected. The last year has been signalized in South America by one of those terrific convulsions which have so often desolated the western coast since the discovery of the new world. A brief notice of this catastrophe was sent me by Mr. Alison, written immediately after the event. He mentions that on the 20th of February, 1835, when Conception, Chillan, and other towns were thrown down in ruins, the sea first retired from the shores of the Bay of Conception, and then returning in a wave about twenty feet high, rolled over several of the towns, and completely destroyed whatever the earthquake had left uninjured. He also states that the coast of the bay was reported to have been heaved up, and that a rock off the landing~ place at the port of Taleahuano, which before the shock was nearly level with high water, stood afterwards three feet above that mark. Large fissures were made in the earth, and water burst from some of them. In these and other particulars Mr. Alison’s letter agrees with the more circumstantial account sent to the Royal Society by Mr. Caldcleugh, who was resident at Valparaiso, but who drew his information in great part from eye-witnesses. He mentions that a great number of the volcanos of the Chilian Andes were in a state of unusual activity during the shocks, and for some time preceding Geological Society. 329 and after the convulsion. Among others, Osorno, of which the cone rises 3900 feet above the sea, and which is situated on the mainland north-east of the island of Chiloe was in eruption, lava being seen to flow from its crater. Several others are also noticed, and the lava emitted from one of them is stated to have covered an area eight leagues in circumference and to the depth of 33 yards. The ashes reached to the distance of 300 leagues. I refer you to these statements because it is rare to meet with any recent descrip- tions of the emission of lava and ashes from the high cones of the Andes. The same writer was informed that the strata of clay-slate, form- ing the shore of the Bay of Conception, were elevated from three to four feet, whereas the rise at San Vicente, south of Talcahuano, amounted to only 15 feet. Mr. Caldcleugh was also informed that the island of Santa Maria, in the Bay of Conception, was upheaved about eight feet. At the same time the island of Juan Fernandez, distant 360 miles from Chili, was violently shaken and devastated by a great wave. A dense column of vapour issued from the sea about a mile from the coast, and flames were seen at the same spot in the night which illumined the whole island. At this point in the sea whence the flames were emitted the depth of water was afterwards ascertained to be no less than 69 fathoms. At a court-martial, lately held at Portsmouth, in consequence of the wreck of the Challenger frigate on the coast of Chili, m May 1835, some notes of Capt. FitzRoy were read, and afterwards com- municated by Capt. Beaufort to the Society, in which he describes some remarkable alterations produced by the earthquake of February in the direction of the currents on the Chilian coast. A more de- tailed account of the convulsion has just been received at the Ad- miralty from the same officer, with a sight of which I have been favoured, but no allusion is here made to the currents. ‘There are, however, other facts perfectly new and of the highest importance at- tested in this memoir, and as they come from an observer of great experience in hydrographical surveying, who examined the Bay of Conception immediately after the shocks, they will remove all doubts _ from the minds of those who have questioned the power of earth- quakes to cause the permanent upheaval of land. Capt. FitzRoy states, that on the 20th of February, 1835, the earthquake was felt at all places between Copiapo and Chiloe from north to south, and from Mendoza to Juan Fernandez from east to west. Conception and other towns were thrown down. After the shock the sea retired; the vessels in the bay grounded, even those which had been lying in seven fathoms water ; all the shoals in the bay were visible; and soon afterwards a wave rushed in and. then retreated, and was followed by two other waves. The verti- cal height of these waves does not appear to have been greater than from 16 to 20 feet, although they rose to much greater heights when they rushed upona sloping beach. During the shocks the earth opened and closed rapidly in numerous places, The direction Third Series, Vol, 8. No. 47. April 1836, 2L 330 Geological Society. of the cracks was not uniform, though generally from south-east to north-west. The earth was not quiet during three days after the great shock, and more than three hundred shocks were counted between 20th February and 4th of March. The loose earth of the valley of the Bio Bio was everywhere parted from the solid rocks which bound the plain, being separated by cracks from an inch to a foot in width. In the Bay of Conception two explosions or eruptions were seen in the sea while the great waves were coming in. One beyond the island of Quiriquina appeared to be a dark column of smoke in shape like a tower; another rose in the Bay of San Vicente like the blowing of an immense imaginary whale. Its disappearance was followed by a whirlpool which lasted some minutes. It was hollow and tended to a point in the middle, as if the sea was pouring into a cavity of the earth. The water in the bay appeared to be everywhere boiling, bubbles of air or gas were rapidly escaping, and dead fish were thrown ashore in quantities. For some days after the 20th February the sea at Talcahuano did not rise to the usual marks by four or five feet vertically. ‘ Some thought that the land had been elevated, but the common and pre- vailing opinion was that the sea had retired. This difference gra- dually diminished till, in the middle of April, there was only a dif- ference of two feet between the existing and former high-water marks. The proof that the land had been raised exists in the fact that the island of Santa Maria was upheaved nine feet; but of this pre- sently. When walking on the shore, even:at high-water, beds of dead mussels, numerous chitons and limpets, and withered sea-weed still adhering, though lifeless, to the rocks on which they had lived, every= where met the eye—the effects of the upheaval of the land.” From the above extracts, then, it appears that in the opinion of Capt. FitzRoy some of the land was first raised in February four or five feet, and that it afterwards gradually returned towards its for- mer level, so that in about two months the temporary increase of its height was diminished by more than one half. The observations which follow respecting Santa Maria, an island seven miles long and two broad, in the Bay of Conception, deserve particular attention, and I shall give them in Capt. FitzRoy’s own words ; for although in so doing I anticipate a communication which I trust will hereafter be given in full to the Society*, I am only sup- plying the proofs of the elevation which was asserted as a fact in Capt. FitzRoy’s notes read before you during the last year. “It appeared that the southern extreme of the island had been raised eight feet, the middle nine, and the northern end up- wards of ten feet. The Beagle visited this island twice, at the end of March and in the beginning of April. At her first visit it was concluded, from the visible evidence of dead shell-fish, water-marks, and soundings, and from the verbal testimony of the inhabitants, * Since the above was written the whole memoir has appeared in the Nautical Magazine for March 1836. Geological Society. 331 ‘that the land had been raised about eight feet. However, on re- turning to Conception, doubts were raised, and to settle the matter beyond dispute, or the possibility of mistake, the owner of the island, Mr. Salvador Palma, accompanied us. An intelligent Ha- noverian, who had lived two years there and knew its shores tho- roughly, was also a passenger in the Beagle. His occupation upon the island was sealing. When we landed, the Hanoverian, whose name was Antonio Vogelborg, showed me a spot from which he used formerly to gather Choros by diving for them at low water. At dead low water, standing upon that bed of choros, and holding his hands up above his head, he could not reach the surface of the water. His height is six feet; on that spot when I was there the choros were barely covered at high spring tide. * Riding round the island afterwards with Mr. Palma and Vogel- borg, many measures were taken in places where no mistake could be made. On large steep-sided rocks, where vertical measures could be correctly taken, beds of dead mussels were found ten feet above the present high-water mark. A few inches only above what was taken as spring-tide high-water mark were putrid shell- fish and sea-weed, which evidently had not been wetted since the upheaval of the land. One foot lower than the highest bed of mus sels, a few limpets and chitons were adhering to the rock where they had grown. Two feet lower than the same, mussels, chitons, and limpets were abundant. * An extensive rocky flat lies around the northern parts of Santa Maria. Before the earthquake this flat was covered by the sea, some projecting rocks only showing themselves. Now the whole flat is exposed. Square acres (or many quadras) of this rocky flat were covered with dead shell-fish, and the stench arising from them was abominable. By this elevation of the land the southern port of Santa Maria has been almost destroyed ; there remains but little shelter, and very bad landing. The soundings have diminished a fathom and a half everywhere around the island.” The author then goes on to inform us that at Tubul, to the south- east of Santa Maria, the land has been raised six feet. At Mocha two feet. No elevation has been ascertained at Valdivia, north- ward of Conception; at Maule, according to the assertion of the governor, the chief pilot, and other residents, the land instead of being elevated had sunk two feet, for they said there were two feet more water on the bar after the shock, and the banks of the river were lowered. Capt. FitzRoy, however, suggests that a rush of wa~ ter might have shifted the loose sands of the bar; so that he doubts the subsidence at Maule, and only feels certain that the land had not risen there. It is scarcely necessary for me to advert to the striking analogy of the phenomena observed by Capt. FitzRoy and those which were formerly described by Mrs. Maria Graham (now Caleott), and pub- lished in our Transactions, respecting the Chilian earthquake of 1822. The coast of Valparaiso, Quintero, and other places was then stated to have undergone unequal erat the greatest amounting only 9 9 wo 332 Geological Society. to a few feet, and banks of sea-shells were laid dry above high-water mark. But these statements, given on the authority of Mrs. Gra- ham’s personal observation, and confirmed by others to which I shall presently allude, have been met by a direct counter-statement so circumstantial and explicit as to deserve the fullest consideration. Mr. Cuming, well known to you by his numerous researches in conchology, declares that being at Valparaiso before and during the earthquake of 1822, and residing there constantly until 1827, he could never detect any proofs of the rise of the land, although his pursuit of conchology and natural history in general caused him to visit frequently the rocks and inlets with which the northern and southern parts of the bay abound. These rocks were covered with Fuci, Patella, Chitons, Balani, &c., yet he never perceived the least difference in their appearance from the date of his arrival to his finally quitting Valparaiso, nor observed any trace of them except in situations covered by the tide. He also remarked that the wa- ter at spring tides rose after the earthquake to the same point on a wall near his house which it had reached before the shocks. He imagines that the idea that a change had taken place in the relative level of land and sea originated in the gain of land opposite Valpa- Taiso, occasioned by the accumulation of detritus at points where the tide had flowed previously to the earthquake. Mr. Cuming first heard of the notion of the land having been elevated at Valpa- raiso when Mrs. Graham’s paper read to the Geological Society in 1824 was talked of at Valparaiso. Neither he nor his friends were then able to subscribe to the opinion expressed in that com- munication. On the other hand, Lieut. Freyer, R.N., in a letter read to you during the last session, observes, that being at Valparaiso after the earthquake of 1822, he saw a shelly beach to the east of the town, above the reach of the tides; and rocks, which was pointed out to him as being less under water than it had been before the convulsion. Dr. Meyen also, a Prussian traveller, who visited Valparaiso in 1831, says he examined the coast there and found appearances in corro- boration of Mrs. Graham’s statements. I may also repeat what I have elsewhere recorded, that some years after the event I applied to Mr. Cruckshanks, an English botanist, who resided in Chili at the time of the earthquake, whether he had seen any signs of the alleged change of level. He said that he examined the coast at Quintero after the shocks, and satisfied himself that it had been uplifted seve= ral feet, and that the fishermen told him that the ocean had gone down and was lower than before, in confirmation of which they pointed to some rocks of greenstone at Quintero, a few hundred yards from the beach, which were always under water previously to the great shock of 1822, but were afterwards uncovered when the tide was at half ebb. Without pretending that I can reconcile this contradictory evi- dence, I may suggest that some discordance in the accounts may have arisen from a want of uniformity in the movement at different places, and still more from a subsequent sinking down of some Geological Society. 333 of the land which was first raised, in the manner described by Capt. FitzRoy as having taken place near Talcahuano in the spring of last year. In perusing Mr. Cuming’s account we must all feel that the author has had no object in view but that of establishing the truth; and the doubts which he has raised will call for a reinvestigation of the phenomena; but after hearing all objections, even before the late convulsion of 1835, I expressed myself satisfied with the proofs in favour of the elevation of 1822*. If I had still cherished any scepticism, it would now be removed by the coincidence of the facts related by Capt. FitzRoy. To suppose that a set of imaginary phenomena, which appeared at first sight very improbable, and which no geologist could explain, should have been invented, in Chili, in 1822, by several intelligent observers, and that thirteen years afterwards nature should realize, in the same country, the same phenomena, or others strictly analogous, so as to lend coun- tenance to all the previous misconceptions, is to imagine a combi- nation of circumstances almost as marvellous as the upheaval of a continent itself. We are indebted to Mr. Woodbine Parish for a collection of histo- rical notices respecting the effects of the earthquake waves of the Pacific, which have repeatedly caused great inundations on the coast of Chili and Peru. The earliest date to which he has traced back these memorials is the year 1582. The sea usually retired in the first instance, and then rolled in upon the land, carrying ships far inland and levelling towns to the ground. Such floods must have left great banks of sand and gravel, mingled occasionally with bro- ken and entire shells, upon dry land, considerably above the level of the highest tides, but they will by no means account for the very elevated position of recent marine shells on various parts of the maritime country of Patagonia, Chili, and Perut. Mr. Freyer, to whom I have before alluded, states that he ob- served in many parts of Peru, especially near Arica and in the Isle of San Lorenzo, in the Bay of Callao, lines of shingle and sand, with shells of existing species, at various elevations above the level of the sea. The rocks of sandstone and gypsum south of the bold pro- montory called the Morro of Arica are shaped into distinct terraces towards the shore, and on these terraces the rock, wherever it is ex- posed, is seen to be incrusted with balani and millepores. At the height of about twenty or thirty feet above the sea, these shells and zoophytes are as abundant and almost as perfect as on the shore; at upwards of fifty feet they still occur, but in an injured state, for although there is no rain in this district to hasten their decay, by alternate moisture and desiccation, still they are abraded by the sand which is constantly blown over them. Some of the recent shells occurring at considerable heights in the island of San Lo- renzo retain their colour almost as freshly as those living in the adjacent sea. Mr. Darwin has also observed in different parts of Patagonia and Chili beds of recent shells at various heights above * Principles of Geology, 4th edit. vol. ii. p. 331. + [See Mr. Woodbine Parish’s paper in our last Number.] 334 Geological Society. the sea, and among them mussels which retained their blue colour, and emit a strong animal odour when thrown into the fire. I shall now turn from the modern changes observed in South America to the evidences of recent alterations in the level of the land in high latitudes in the northern hemisphere. Dr. Pingel, a Danish mineralogist and naturalist, has communicated some facts showing the gradual sinking of part of the west coast of Greenland, It is now more than fifty years since Arctander inferred that this coast had subsided, having noticed some buildings in the Firth called Igalliko, on a low rocky island near the shore, almost en- tirely submerged at spring tides. From this point, which is in lat. 60° 43! north, to Disco bay, extending to nearly the 69th degree of north latitude, Dr. Pingel has traced various signs of the depression of the land, ancient settlements of the Greenlanders and Moravians being now overflowed by the sea. In one case the Moravians were obliged to move inland the poles upon which their large boats were set, and the old poles still remain beneath the water as silent wit- nesses of the change. It is also mentioned that no aboriginal Green- lander builds his hut near the water’s edge. Having conversed with Dr. Pingel, at Copenhagen, on this subject, I am convinced that the phenomena cannot be explained away by reference to a rise of the tides at particular points, the advance of the sea being general for more than 600 miles from north to south, and caused not by the undermining of cliffs and the denudation of land, but by submers gence of what was before above water. I am the less inclined to question the probability of a general sub- sidence of the land in Greenland, because I now believe that an equally slow and gradual movement is taking place, but in an oppo- site direction, throughout a large part of Sweden and Finland. I ventured formerly to controvert the proofs adduced in favour of such an upheaval of land in those countries, although the fact had been advocated by Celsius, the Swede, and in later times by Play- fair and Von Buch. But after visiting, in 1834, several parts both of the eastern and western coasts of Sweden, I became satisfied that an elevation is in progress, more rapid at Stockholm than further to the south, and greater at Gefle than at Stockholm. The rate of rise appears in some places to have amounted only to a few inches in a century, in other places to several feet, but as far as I could learn from the report of pilots, travellers, fishermen, and traders, the alteration extends to the North Cape, and is probably felt over a space more than 1000 miles in length from north to south, and several hundred miles in breadth. The evidence is derived from many sources, partly from tradition and from the recollection of the oldest inhabitants and seafaring men, partly from the position of ancient buildings on the coast, and partly from marks chiselled at different periods on rocks bordering the sea, for the express purpose of indicating the ancient standard level of the waters. As the details of my own observations have been published in the Philosophical Transactions of last year*, I need only add that at one * [See Lond. and Edinb. Phil. Mag., vol. vi. p. 297.] Geological Society. 385 spot to the south of Stockholm I saw what appeared to me a con= elusive proof of an alternate rising and sinking of the same land since this region was inhabited by man, first a depression of the ground of at least 50 feet below its former level, and then a re-elevation of the same amounting to at least 50 feet. The probable cause of the prolonged and insensible movements of large masses of land opens a wide and inviting field for specu lation. As we know that volcanic action is never dormant in some parts of the interior of the globe, it seems most natural to imagine that an alternate expansion and contraction of the earth’s crust may arise from a gradual increase or diminution of its temperature. Mr. Babbage has suggested that as many common kinds of stone have been shown by experiment to augment in volume when heated, and decrease in bulk when slowly cooled, a great thickness of sub- jacent rock may cause the surface to rise or sink according to the variations experienced in the subterranean temperature. We have also to consider the effects which might result from the slow cool- ing and crystallization of large reservoirs of melted matter, on which subject we have unfortunately as yet few experiments to guide our conjectures. We know not, for example, whether the passage from a fluid to a solid state would uplift or let down an incumbent mass of rock. A dense fluid, subjected to immense pressure, may, perhaps, on crystallizing into a rock like granite, oc~ cupy more space in its state of solidiry. Imeed not remind you that as ice floats in water, soa bar of cast iron floats on the surface of melted iron. But however obscure the origin of the movements in question, their reality if admitted affords a key to the interpretation of a va- riety of geological appearances, some of which I shall now proceed to consider. Dr. Beck has mentioned that the oldest strata in Denmark are often covered by deposits of gravel, sand, and loam, several hun- dred feet thick, in which, but more commonly upon them, lie erratic blocks. The sand and gravel beds rarely contain any fossils, but when shells do occur they are absolutely identical with living species. He has also found, in the lower valleys of Jutland, more than se- venty species of shells now living in the German Ocean. These facts agree precisely with others which I observed in different parts of Sweden, and which J have described in the memoir before al- luded to. On the west coast, between Uddevalla and Gothenborg, the beds of sand, gravel, and clay, containing recent oceanic shells, are seen at various heights from 100 to 300 feet above the sea. M. Alex. Brongniart formerly pointed out those which rest on the gneiss, near Uddevalla, and like him I saw Balani still attached to the rocks at the height of more than 150 feet above the sea-level. I ought, however, to state that at the points where I discovered them they had not been exposed to decomposition in the atmosphere ever since their emergence. On the contrary, the adhering shells had been protected by a covering of shelly sand only removed of late years for road-making. I need scarcely insist upon the obvious 336 Geological Society. inference that the Balaniand corallines which also cover the rocks, and which are of the same species as those found on the shells of the re- cent strata in contact with the rocks, prove that the gneiss was long submerged beneath the waters, and that the shells werenot washed up by an inroad of the sea upon the land. In theisland of Orust, opposite Uddevalla, I found similar appearances, and on other parts of the western coast ; but on the eastern shores of Sweden or those bor- dering the Baltic, both to the north and south of Stockholm, a marked distinction is recognised. In the assemblage of fossil shells which there occur in beds of upraised gravel, sand, and clay, the testacea belong to recent species, yet not to that assemblage which inhabits the ocean, but to a confined number of mixed freshwater and marine species characteristic of the brackish waters of the Baltic. Such deposits rise near Stockholm to the height of 200 feet above the sea, and show that the relative level of land and sea has greatly changed, not only since the existing testacea were in being, but also since the Baltic was divided off from the ocean as an inland sea freshened by a superabundance of river water. It is well known that these parts of Sweden are densely strewed over with huge erratic blocks, many of the largest of which oc- cur in the highest part of ridges of sand and gravel, finely stratified or made up of a continued series of thin layers of sand, loam, and gravel. In one of these ridges, at Upsala, I found layers of marl, containing perfect shells of recent species, such as live in the Baltic. The ridge was about 100 feet high, and on the summit of it were blocks of gneiss and granite, measuring from eight to ten feet in length. I saw similar boulders but inferior in size overlying some deposits of recent shells in Orust and near Uddevalla*. Hence it is evident that the transportation of these rocky fragments into their present position continued after the period when the modern shelly formations of both the coasts of Sweden were accumulated. In addition to the facts enumerated in my paper on Sweden in the Philosophical Transactions for 1835, in regard to the agency of ice- islands, I may mention a fact observed by Dr. Beck on the coast of Jutland. He has ascertained that on the breaking up of the fringe of ice which encircles the coast there during winter, small islands of ice float off and carry with them not only small gravel from the beach but stones four feet in diameter firmly frozen into the solid mass. These ice-floes are sometimes driven eastward into the Cattegat, and have been known to stop up the narrow part of the passage of the Great Belt, and to cause new reefs of rocks thus transported on which ves- sels, and a few years ago a Danish man-of-war, have been stranded. If such power can be exerted by ice-islands, only a few hun- dred feet in diameter, in latitudes corresponding to those of En- gland, we may be well prepared to find thatislands several leagues in circumference may remove blocks of the magnitude of small houses. Capt. Bayfield, in commenting on the inferences which I had drawn as to the transporting power of ice in the Baltic, communi- * Phil, Trans., 1835, p. 33. Geological Society. 337 cated to me several interesting facts observed by him both on the Jakes of Canada and in the St. Lawrence. In the river last men- tioned the loose ice, when the water is low in winter, accumulates on the shoals, the separate fragments being readily frozen together into solid masses in a climate were the temperature is sometimes 30° below zero. In this ice boulders become entangled, and in the spring, when the river rises after the melting of the snow, the packs are floated off, frequently conveying away the boulders to great di- stances. Heavy anchors of ships lying on the shore have in like manner been closed in and removed. He also states that immense jce-islands, detached far to the north, perhaps in Baffin’s Bay, are brought by the current in great numbers down the coast of Labrador every year, and are frequently carried through the Straits of Belle- isle between Newfoundlandand the continent of America, which, after passing through the Straits, sometimes float for several hundred miles to the south-west up the Gulf of St. Lawrence. In one of these icebergs which Capt. Bayfield examined, he found heaps of boulders, gravel, and stones, and he saw other ice-floes discoloured by mud. Capt. Belcher also informs us that in 1815, when in His Majesty’s ship Bellerophon he fell in with field-ice off New- foundland, near St. John’s Harbour, in which there were muddy streaks, gravel, and even stones: it was in the heat of summer and torrents of water were shooting off the ice. The importance of these phznomena will be duly appreciated by the geologist who reflects that they relate to the annual transportation of rocks from high la- titudes probably corresponding to those of the northern parts of Norway and Sweden, and that the points sometimes reached by the ice are further south than any part of Great Britain. It is there- fore by no means necessary to speculate on the former existence of a climate more severe than that now prevailing in the Western Hemi- sphere in order to explain how the travelled masses in Northern Europe may have been borne along by ice. We know from inde- pendent evidence that large parts of the lands bordering the Baltic, and now strewed over with erratics, have constituted the bed of the sea at a comparatively modern period. It may be asked whether I refer all erratics, even those of Swit- zerland and the Jura, to the carrying power of ice. In regard to those of Switzerland I have elsewhere endeavoured to show that a combination of local causes might have contributed to their transfer ; for repeated shocks of earthquakes may have thrown down rocky fragments upon glaciers, causing at the same time avalanches of snow and ice, by which narrow gorges would be choked up and deep Alpine valleys, such as Chamouni, converted into lakes. In these lakes, portions of the fissured glaciers, with huge incumbent or included rocks might float off, and on the escape of the lake, after the melting of the temporary barrier of snow, they might be swept down into the lower country*. M. Charpentier has lately proposed another theory which he in- * Principles of Geology, vol. iii. p. 149, 1833, enlarged in later editions, 338 Geological Society. forms us is merely a development of one first advanced by M, Venetz. The Alpine blocks, according to these writers, were not carried by water, for had that been the case the largest would be either in the Alpine valleys or near the base of the great chain, and we should find their size and number diminish as we receded from their original point of departure. But the fact is otherwise, many of the blocks on the Jura, or those farthest removed from the starting-place, being of the largest dimensions. They suppose, therefore, in accordance with the opinion of M. de Beaumont and others, that the elevation of the Alps occurred at a comparatively modern epoch, and that when these mountains were first upheaved they were more lofty than now, and more deeply covered with snow and glaciers. After the principal movement had ceased, a lower- ing of the Alps took place, the dislocated and shattered beds re- quiring time to settle down into their present more solid and stable form. According to this hypothesis, therefore, the erratic blocks are monuments of the greater magnitude and extent of the ancient glaciers under a different configuration of the surface. I have not space for all the ingenious arguments adduced, after a minute exa- mination of the ground by M. Charpentier in support of this theory, but must refer you to the original memoir *. Before leaving this subject I may observe, that although it is rare, in modern times, to meet with icebergs in the northern hemisphere so far south as the Azores, in north latitude 42°, yet they have been seen there, and not unfrequently in north lat. 44°, within the pre- sent century, thus reaching the parallel of Southern Italy and Cen- tral Spain. In the southern hemisphere we learn from Capt. Hors- burgh that some large ones were carried, in 1828, still nearer to the equator as far as lat. 35° south, or within about forty miles of the Cape of Good Hope. I do not remember, when examining alluvial deposits, to have seen any blocks in Sicily nor in Italy till I approached the foot of the Alps; and in Sweden I found them in- creasing in number and size as I advanced northwards, where I saw some between thirty and forty feet in diameter. The erratics, theres fore, as far as my experience extends, are a northern phenomenon 3 and M. Charpentier states, on the authority of Humboldt, that there are no such fragments at the eastern foot of the equatorial Andes, where, notwithstanding the altitude of the mountains, there are no glaciers. But assuming that ice could have transported into their present position those myriads of angular blocks which cover the low coun- tries bordering the Baltic, in what manner and by what force could these masses have been detached from the mountains of which'they once formed a part? Now the granitic rocks in Sweden sometimes consist of large tabular masses, traversed by numerous horizontal and vertical joints ; and entire hills may be said to be broken up, * Sur les Blocs Errat. de la Suisse, Ann. des Sci., tom. viii. p. 219. Mr. Bakewell has also in some one of his works alluded to the carrying of Alpine blocks by ice. as Geological Society. $39 situ, into blocks of the same forms and dimensions as the erratics of the Baltic. I remarked this particularly in Ostrogothland, near Lake Roxen. Whether this fissuring of the rocks has been due to earth- quakes, or the expansive power of ice in northern regions, or to what other causes I cannot pretend to decide; but reefs of such jointed. rocks before they emerged from the sea might have afforded an in- exhaustible supply of detached fragments, over and around which the ice would freeze in winter. One block after another might be buoyed up and floated off on the rise of the Baltic when the snows melted, or of the ocean during'high tides. It has been suggested that large blocks may have been pushed. far over the bed of the sea and over the land by a succession of waves raised by earthquakes or by hurricanes. Without denying that such agency may explain some facts in geology, I may remark that we cannot be too much on our guard against assuming violent catastrophes where the effects may have been brought about tran- quilly, and even with extreme slowness. Let us imagine, for ex- ample, a sunken reef of granite in Baffin’s Bay, in about 75° north lat., divided into fragmentary masses as above described, and these masses becoming year after year involved in packed ice. In a few months they may be drifted more than 1800 miles to the southward, through the Straits of Belleisle, to the 48° north lat., the ice mov- ing perhaps at a slow rate—no more thanamile an hour. We might even land upon such ice-fields and be unable to determine whether they were in motion or not. After a repetition of these operations for thousands of years, the uneven bed of the ocean far to the south may be strewed over with drift fragments which have either stranded on shoals or have dropped down from melting bergs. Suppose the floor of the ocean where they alight to be on the rise as gradually as the bottom of the Baltic in our own times. The change may be so insensible that pilots may suspect, and yet scarcely dare to insist upon the fact till its reality is confirmed by the experience of centuries. At length a submarine ridge, covered with the tra~ velled fragments, emerges, and first constitutes an island, which at length becomes connected with the main land,—in time, perhaps, the site of a university like Upsala. Here the question is agitated whether the land is stationary, or continually rising beneath their feet. Perchance they decide that it is motionless, and yet it con- tinues to move upwards, “ E pur si muove,” till by a growth as im- perceptible as that of the forest tree, what was once a submarine reef becomes the summit of an inland mountain. Here the geologist admires the position, number, and bulk of the transported fragments ; identifies them with the parent mountains, a thousand miles distant to the north; and in speculating on the causes of the phenomena, imagines mighty deluges and tremendous waves raised by the shock of a comet, or the sudden starting up of a chain like the Andes out of the sea, by which huge rocks were scattered over hill and dale as readily as shingle is cast up by the breakers on a sea beach. But it is time to return from these digressions and to consider the other memoirs treating of these and similar subjects which have $40 Geological Society. been lately read to the Society. There is perhaps no class of geo- logical phenomena in Great Britain which has hitherto remained in more obscurity than that relating to the distribution and origin of superficial gravel, sand, and mud, especially that which has been called diluvium. Mr. Murchison, in his examination of the older rocks of part of Wales and England, has made a great step towards reducing these phenomena to order, and has thrown so much light upon them that his treatise may be considered not only as one of much local interest, but as likely to contribute powerfully towards the establishment of a general theory of these deposits. He has distinguished between the local drift, or the gravel and alluvium of South Wales and Siluria, and that which he terms the northern drift of Lancashire, Cheshire, North Salop, and parts of Worcester and Gloucester. The surface of the Welsh and Silurian territories is exempt from the debris of far-transported rocks, the alluvium there being derived from the adjacent mountains, while Herefordshire is chiefly covered with debris of the old red sandstone. The au- thor, after giving a detailed description of the drainage of the Teme, Onny, Lug, and Wye, shows that in the valleys of these rivers the loose materials change with each successive range which they traverse, the fragments becoming smaller in proportion as they have been carried to greater distances towards the valley of the Se- vern. It is also demonstrated that there is an evident connexion between the distribution of this ancient gravel or drift and the strike and dip of the strata in the Welsh and Silurian mountains ; and hence it is inferred that the scattering of certain fragments took place during the original upheaving of the mountains. But there are other wide-spread accumulations of sand and gravel in the valleys of the same region, which have partly been due to the existing rivers, and partly to lakes which were drained long after the first emersion of the country from the sea. The above-mentioned alluvia differ entirely from another kind of detritus, which is spread over parts of Lancashire, Cheshire, and North Shropshire, and which consists of granites, porphyries, and. other hard rocks, similar to those of Cumberland and some of the Scotch mountains. To these, with their associated clay and sand, the author gives the name of the northern drift. It has two di- stinguishing features: first, the occasional occurrence in and upon it of large blocks or boulders of northern origin, sometimes of great size, like the erratics of the Baltic, and none of which ever enter into the region of the Welsh drift; secondly, the association with it of marine shells of existing species. This last fact was formerly noticed by the author and Mr. Gilbertson, at Preston in Lancashire, at heights of 350 feet above the sea. Sir Philip Egerton has since observed the same shells in sand and gravel, north of Tarporley, in Cheshire, at the height of 70 feet, where they occur at the western base of the Forest Hills, about nine miles from the nearest point of the estuary ofthe Mersey. But what is still more remarkable, Mr. Trimmer found similar recent marine shells on Moel Tryfane, near the Menai Straits, at the height of 1592 feet above the level of Geological Society. 341 the sea. The same author also reported to us that he had disco- vered similar gravel with recent marine shells overlying a peat bog near Shrewsbury, in which were the remains of a submerged forest. Mr. Murchison, however, having examined this spot, has shown us that the supposed trees were stakes with sharpened puints. driven into the ground, forming a woodwork which supported an old road, and over these piles the shelly gravel or northern drift had been afterwards spread artificially. I understand that Mr. Trimmer is now fully aware of the mistake into which he had fallen. From the evidence afforded by the shells, as well as by the indica- tion of several newly discovered localities where they occur sixty miles from the nearest sea-coast, Mr. Murchison infers that the tracts covered by them must have formed the bed of the sea during the modern period, and as the granitic drift occupying the high grounds east of Bridgnorth rises to the height of 500 or 600 feet, and thence descends in a deltoid form into the Vale of Worcester, he conceives that the sea also extended over the valley of the Severn from Bridg- north to the Bristol Channel, so that there was then a strait sepa- rating Wales and Siluria on the one side from England on the other. The deposits observed by Mr. Strickland at Cropthorne and at other points in the valley of the Avon, an eastern tributary of the Severn, and which contain fluviatile and land shells, with the bones of extinct quadrupeds, must, according to Mr. Murchison, have been accumulated at the mouth of a river which flowed from the east, or from the Cotteswold Hills, into the ancient straits above alluded to, and into which the northern drift was prolonged. There are sections near Shrewsbury from which Mr. Murchison has been enabled to deduce the relative age of the two alluvial for- mations, the local or Welsh drift having in those places been found. covered by the clay and boulders of the northern drift. The latter is, therefore, evidently of newer origin. As to the mode in which the erratic blocks were transported, Mr. Murchison adverts to the possible agency of ice-floes, and to thedifficulty of imagining that cur- rents of water alone, whether of rivers or the ocean, could have ex- erted a force adequate to their removal to such great distances; many boulders of several tons in weight having been transported to more than 100 miles from the nearest possible source of their origin. He also infers from the position of the shells, gravel, and boulders, that they were not washed, as has sometimes been imagined, by one or more diluvial waves over preexisting lands, but were all de- posited during the same period in the bed of the sea, which bed was afterwards uplifted to unequal heights by movements of eleva- tion of unequal intensity—movements which, though so largely affecting the physical geography of our island, must have taken place within the modern era. Mr. Edward Spencer has communicated to us the result of his examination of the “diluvium” near Finchley, and the summits of the neighbouring hills of Highgate and Hampstead. The gravel there contains water-worn boulders of granite and porphyry, toge- $42 Geological Society. ther with fragments of secondary rocks with their characteristic fossils from the mountain limestone to the chalk inclusive. Mr, Spencer supposes that the current which brought these materials into their present situation must have flowed from the north. The diluvium here alluded to seems to correspond to that which covers the crag of Norfolk, and which is in some places intimately con- nected with that deposit. Imay add that I have seen a similar for- mation on the banks of the Elbe, below Hamburgh, and in other parts of Denmark, with erratic blocks included in it in some laces. : Our Secretary, Mr. Hamilton, has described a bed of marine shells, of recent species, on the southern coast of Fifeshire, near Elie, part of the deposit being twelve or fourteen feet above the level of high tide. Similar marine shells have been observed above the sea-level in many of the low lands bordering the estuaries of the Forth and Tay; and in the memoirs before mentioned Mr. Murchi- son has described a raised beach at the mouth of Carlingford Bay, Treland, which he lately examined in company with Professor Sedg- wick. Mr. Dela Beche also informs us that he has lately disco- vered proofs of two movements of the land of Somerset, Devon, and Cornwall, one to a height of about thirty to forty feet above the present sea-level, and another to an uncertain depth beneath it, both subsequent to the period when the vegetation of the land and the molluscous inhabitants of the neighbouring sea were the same as they now are. The evidence, therefore, is annually augmenting in favour of con- siderable alterations in the relative level of land and sea having been brought about in northern Europe at a comparatively modern epoch, For this reason I am more than ever disposed to refer to great move- ments of elevation and depression, the origin and present position of the loess of the valley of the Rhine, of which I gave some account in a former year. I have lately had occasion to recall your atten- tion to this ancient silt im which terrestrial and aquatic shells are preserved of species still living in Europe. It is found from below Cologne to the neighbourhood of the Falls of Schaffhausen, exhibit- ing almost everywhere the same mineralogical character and fossils, forming sometimes low hills which cover the gravel of the great al~ luvial plain of the Rhine, sometimes rising up on the flanks of the mountains which border the great valley to an elevation of 300 or 400 feet above the river, or more than 1200 feet above the sea. I discovered lately, in the neighbourhood of Basle, the first remains of fossil fish which have been detected in this silt; and Mr. Agassiz recognized them as the vertebrz of a small species of the Shark fa- mily, perhaps of the genus Lamna. They were associated with the usual fresh-water and terrestrial shells, and the fact appeared ano- malous, but the celebrated ichthyologist informs me that species of this family and of the Skate tribe have been known to ascend from the sea up the mouths of the rivers Senegal and Amazon to the di- stance of several hundred miles. Some have imagined that a great lake once extended throughout i Geological Society. 343 the valley of the Rhine, which sent off large branches up the courses of the Mayne, Neckar, and other tributary valleys, in all of which large patches of loess are occasionally met with. The barrier of such a lake has been placed in the narrow gorge of the Rhine between Bingen and Bonn; but this theory is untenable, as there are proofs of the loess having once filled that gorge, and of its having over- spread the adjoining hills of the Lower Eifel; also that it reached to the flanks of the hills bounding the valley of the Rhine as far down as Cologne and still further. Instead of supposing one continuous lake of sufficient extent and depth to allow of the simultaneous accumulation of loess at all heights and throughout the whole area where it now occurs, I conceive that subsequently to the period when the countries now drained by the Rhine and its tributaries, acquired nearly their actual form and geo- graphical features, they were again depressed gradually by a move- ment like that now in progress on the west coast of Greenland. In proportion as the whole district was lowered, the general fall of the waters between the Alps and the ocean was lessened, and both the main and lateral valleys, becoming more subject to river inundations, were partially filled up with fluviatile silt containing land and fresh- water shells. After this operation, when a thickness of many hun- dred feet of loess had been thrown down slowly, and in the course of many centuries, the whole region was once more upheaved gradu- ally, but perhaps not equally, throughout the whole region. During this upward movement most of the fine loam was carried off by denudation to such an extent that the original valleys were nearly re-excavated. The country was thus restored to its pristine state, with the exceptionof those patches of loess still remaining, and which, from their frequency and their remarkable homogeneousness of composition and fossils, attest the original continuity and common origin of the whole. By introducing such general fluctuations of re- lative level, we may dispense with the necessity of erecting and after- wards removing a great barrier more than 1200 feet high, sufficient to exclude the ocean from the valley of the Rhine during the accu- mulation of the loess. Dr. Fitton has again brought before us those curious phenomena in the Island of Portland from which the former alternate existence of sea, of dry land, and lastly, of a body of fresh water in the same place, all anterior to the formation of the chalk, has been clearly in- ferred. In the ancient soil, called in Portland, the “ Dirt bed,” the silicified trunks of trees and their roots are still preserved. Some curious facts are just published on this subject in the new Part of our Transactions, in a memoir by Dr. Buckland and Mr. De la Beche. After Mr. Webster had first made known the nature and existence of the dirt bed, Professor Henslow ascertained that between this and the marine oolite of Portland there were two other beds of car’ bonaceous clay, and in one of these Dr. Fitton has now found the remains of Cycadez, from which it appears that the forest of the dirt bed was not the first vegetation which grew on this tract. First there must have been the sea of the oolite, then land which sup- 344 Geological Society. ported Cycadez, then a lake or estuary in which freshwater strata were deposited, then again land on which other Cycadez and a fo- rest of dicotyledonous trees flourished ; then a second submergence under fresh water, in which new strata were formed ; and finally, a return of the ocean in the South-east of England, when the green- sand and chalk were superimposed upon the Wealden. The ap- pearances in Portland alluded to by Dr. Fitton may be explained either by the alternate rising or sinking of the same ground, or by simply supposing one gradual and continuous subsidence in a region where a large and turbid river entered the sea. The conversion of certain tracts into land several feet high might be caused in a single year by river-inundations, and there might be sufficient time for a forest to grow upon these before the continued sinking down of the land (assuming it to have been constant) had time to cause the tract to be again submerged. I have before adverted to the petrified forest described by Mr. Darwin, in Chili, where the trees have grown ona bed of lava, and have then been covered by sand and sedi- mentary and volcanic matter 2000 feet thick. These facts seem to prove that the region of the Andes, instead of having been raised up suddenly and at once, a few thousand years before our time, as some have conjectured, has undergone, even since the commence= ment of the tertiary period, vast movements of depression as well as of elevation. Among the modern changes of the surface of the globe which have been attributed to a depression of the earth’s crust, I may men- tion the great cavity in Western Asia spoken of by Humboldt in his Asiatic Fragments. ‘The supposed existence of a region of dry land 18,000 square leagues in area, surrounding the Caspian Sea, and be- low the mean level of the ocean, naturally excited the most lively curiosity. The fact was regarded for twenty years as established by a series of barometrical measurements made in 1811 by Profes- sors Engelhardt and Parrot. The difference of level which these travellers assigned to the Caspian and Black Seas amounted to about 350 feet. But Professor Parrot, having revisited the tract in 1829 and 1830, soon found reason to doubt the accuracy of his former conclu- sions. He learnt that some Russian engineers had ascertained by careful measurements that the Don, at the place called Katschalinsk, where it is only sixty wersts distant from the Wolga, is 130 Paris feet higher than the latter river, and as the Don flows with much greater rapidity to the Black Sea than the Wolga does to the Cas- pian, the difference of level between the two seas, if any, must be. considerably less than 130 feet. Parrot accordingly made a series of levellings from the mouth of the Wolga to Zarytzin, 400 wersts up its course, and from the mouth of the Don to the like distance ; and these observations gave as a result that the mouth of the Don was between three and four feet lower than that of the Wolga! So that, according to this measurement, if there is any difference between the levels of the two seas, the Caspian is the highest! Baron Humboldt, who with other geographers had given full credit to the former statement of Parrot, very naturally refused to admit Linnean Society. 345 the validity of these new observations, unless the Professor was pre- pared to show that his former ones were less worthy of confidence, In reply to this, Professor Parrot, in his Appendix, admits that the barometrical instruments used in 1811 were imperfect, and that his former calculations also were in some respects inaccurate. It appears tome perfectly natural that Baron Humboldt, M. Arago, and others, should have willingly admitted the supposed fact of a con- siderable variation between the levels of the Caspian and Black Seas. It is well known that the Mediterranean sustains its level at nearly the same height as the ocean, by drawing largely from the Atlantic on one side and from the Black Sea on the other. But if these constant supplies of water were cut off, if the Straits of Gibraltar and Constantinople were closed, and the Mediterranean became an inland lake isolated like the Caspian, its level must immediately fall. Its loss, by evaporation, would not be counterbalanced by the influx of river water, and there would then exist around its borders a tract of dry land lower than the ocean. It is true that we have no data for deciding to what extent this depression of level would reach; but it would present, at least on a small scale, a phzenomenon analogous to that supposed to have been established in the case of the Cas- pian. With every inclination to acknowledge and duly to appreciate the honest zeal with which Professor Parrot has laboured to correct his first error, 1 may remark that it does not yet appear why three or four years were lost after 1829 in putting the scientific world on their guard, and above all why the author of the Asiatic Fragments, published in 1831, was allowed to remain in ignorance of results previously obtained. Gentlemen, I have now endeavoured to lay before you a brief sketch of the principal subjects referred to in the papers and in the discussions which have engaged the attention of the Society during the last year. I have confined myself exclusively to our own Pro- ceedings ; for the limits of this address would not allow me to give an analysis even of all the English works on Geology which have ap- peared since our last Anniversary, still less of all those which have been published on the Continent. A brief notice of these last would indeed require a volume, and this fact alone should inspire us with a feeling of strength and confidence in the future progress of Geology, which although it had scarcely obtained a recognised place among the sciences towards the close of the last century, has already risen into such importance as to excite a general interest in every nation throughout the world where the works of nature are studied. LINNEAN SOCIETY. Dec. 15, 1835.—A communication from Charles C. Babington, Esq., M.A., F.L.S., on several new or imperfectly understood British and European Plants, was read. Among the species whose history is elucidated in this paper are the following, viz. Third Series. Vol. 8. No.47. April 1836. 2M 346 Rvological Society. 1. Crepis virens, L. This is the Crepis tectorum of British au- thors, which must henceforth be removed from our Flora, C. virens has the leaves even at the margin, the achenia smooth, and shorter than the pappus. C. tectorwm has the leaves revolute at the edges, and the achenia scabrous, equalling the pappusin length. 2. Habenaria chlorantha, and bifolia. The former is the Orchis bifolia of Fl. Brit, and Engl. Bot., and the latter is the difolia of Linnzus, as is proved by the specimen in his Herbarium, and is identical also with the Platanthera brachyglossa of Reichenbach. Among the additions to the British Flora we may reckon the following: Ist, /Zerniaria ciliata, a species hitherto confounded with glabra; from which it is principally distinguished by its ovate ciliated leaves, The Cornish habitat for glabra belongs to thisspecies. 2ndly, Polyzonum maritimum, L., found by Mr. Borrer on_ the sandy shore near Muddiford. 3rdly, P. Razz, the marinum of Ray’s Synopsis, and the aviculare e of Smith. 4thly, P.dumetorum, L., an interesting addition discovered by Mr. Hankey in a wood near Wimbledon. 5thly, Luphorbia corallioides, L., found at Slinfold, Sussex, and perhaps scarcely to be reckoned indigenous. It is the pilosa of the Ist edit. of Hooker's Brit. Flora. 6thly, Erica Mackait, a species discovered on Craigha Moira, Cunnemara. In its essential characters it approaches to E. Tetralix; but in habit it resembles E. ciliaris. March 1.—His Grace the Duke of Somerset, President, in the chair. Some account of a species of Agave introduced accidentally into the Deccan; by Lieut.-Col. Sykes, F.R.S. &c.,—was read. A number of young plants of this species came up accidentally in the garden of the collector at Poonah, in a border that had been appropriated the year before to a collection of bulbous roots that had been obtained from the Cape of Good Hope. One of the lants flowered in the fifth year after their first appearance. The height of the flower-stem was 25 feet. Although the fowers were apparently perfect, no seeds were produced. After the flowers had fallen, a multitude of small bulbs were produced on the branches. The species proves to be identical with the Agave cubensis, a plant discovered by Jacquin in the island of Cuba. It belongs to Ven- tenat’s Fourcroya, a group of species distinguished from the normal Agaves by their dilated filaments, and by the thickened base of the style. arn 16.—Read a continuation of Dr. Hamilton’s Commentary _on the Hortus Malabaricus. ee ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY. November 10, 1835.—At the request of the Chairman, Mr. Gould exhibited a specimen of the true Lanner Hawk, Falco Lanarius, Linn., and entered into some details with respect to its distinguishing pe- culiarities. Its real characters, he stated, have hitherto been so im- perfectly understood as to have led to very general doubts as to its existence as a distinct species. Mr. Gould also exhibited specimens of two species of Pheasant, Zoological Society. $47 . both of very great rarity, which had recently come into his posses- sion: they were the Phasianus Semmeringii, Temm., and the Phas. versicolor, Ej. He accompanied the exhibition by some remarks on the subdivisions which appear to him to be required among the Pha- sianide generally ; and more especially on the position, among that extensive group, of the species exhibited. Mr. Bell read ‘‘ Some Account of the Crustacea of the Coasts of South America, with Descriptions of New Genera and Species; founded principally on the Collections obtained by Mr. Cuming and Mr. Miller. (Tribus 1, Oxyrhynchi.)” The skeleton was exhibited of a Coypus, Myopotamus Coypus,Comm., together with preparations of some of the viscera obtained from the same individual, which recently died at the Society's Gardens. With reference to them some notes by Mr. Martin were read, which are given in the Proceedings. Mr. Christy subsequently exhibited several skins of the Coypus, for the purpose of directing the attention of the Meeting to the po- sition of the mamme in the female, which are situated extremely high up the sides. Nov. 24.—Mr. Yarrell exhibited a specimen of the SyngnathusAcus, Linn., with the view of again* calling the attention of the Society to the fact that the males in this species of Pipe-fish are furnished with a pouch under the tail, in which they bear about with them the ova until the young have escaped from the capsule; and which probably serves also as a place of shelter to which the young can, for some time after their exclusion, retreat in case of danger. In this indivi- dual the opened abdomen exhibited the preparatory organs of the male; and the displayed subcaudal pouch showed many eggs con- tained in it, the young of which were fully developed and ready to escape from the capsules, while from others the young had actually escaped. As a guide to those observers who may be desirous of procuring specimens equally illustrative of the peculiarity of this fish, Mr. Yarrell mentioned that the individual exhibited was ob- tained on the 20th of July. Mr. Yarrell read some “‘ Notes on the Economy of an Insect destruc- tive to'Turnips”; which he prefaced by adverting to the importance to agriculture of an attentive collection of those entomological facts which relate to species injurious to the ordinary crops of the farmer. He then proceeded to remark that the turnip crop is in this country usually infested in every season by two species of Haltica; and that another destroyer has been, in the dry summer of this year, super- added to them, especially on the light and chalky soils. To the history of this latter pest, which has been known to occur in those seasons only in which there has been an almost total absence of rain, Mr. Yarrell’s paper is directed. A good account of a similar visita~ tion in 1782, as it was observed in Norfolk by Mr. William Marshall, was published in the ‘ Philosophical Transactions’ for the following year. Early in July last the “‘ yellow fly ” was seen upon the young tur- * See Lond. and Edinb. Phil. Mag., vol. vi. p. 383, 2M2 ms 248 Royal Institulion. nips. It was remembered by some farmers that this was the fly . which prevailed in the year 1818, and which was followed by the caterpillars known by the name of the blacks. The eggs being depo- sited by the perfect insect in the leaf of the plant, the black cater- pillar or turnip-pest speedily makes its appearance, feeding on the soft portions of the leaves of the turnips and leaving the fibres un- touched; and finally, casting its black skin and assuming one of a more slaty or grey colour, it buries itself in the earth. Lodged there, it forms for itself, from the soil, a strong oval cocoon; from which some of the earlier broods pass almost immediately into the perfect state, filled with ova, and ready quickly to supply another generation of destroyers. So compiete and so rapid was the destruction in some instances, that a whole field was found, in two or three days, to pre- sent only an assemblage of skeletonized leaves; and this too when the turnips had attained a considerable size. The insect whose proceedings have heen thus briefly noticed, be- longs to the Hymenopterous family Tenthredinide ; it is the Athalia Centifolie, a species first noticed by Panzer. Mr. Yarrell describes the perfect insect and the caterpillar; and then recurs to the damage effected by the latter. By their repeated broods the devastation was continued for so long a time that even the third sowing did not in all cases escape destruction ; and it was not until the occurrence of the heavy rains in September, terminating the unusually dry summer, that the mischief ceased. The destruction of the leaves caused, in most instances, the loss of the root also; and where the leaves suf- fered from the attacks of the black caterpillar, but not sufficiently to occasion the death of the plant, the turnip itself became pithy and of little value. It has become necessary, Mr. Yarrell states, to im- port the root largely from the Continent to supply the deficiency of the home crop. The remedial measures adopted on a former visitation were the turning into the infested fields of a large number of ducks, who greedily devoured the caterpillars as they were brushed from the leaves by a boy with a long pole; the passing of a heavy roller over the ground at night, when the caterpillars were at their feed; and the strewing of quick lime by broad cast over the fields, renewing it as often as it was dispersed by the wind. The latter mode was generally considered as the most effectual preservative. PROCEEDINGS AT THE YFRIDAY-EVENING MEETINGS OF THE ROYAL INSTITUTION. Jan. 22, 1836.—Mr. Faraday on silicified plants and fossils, and the proposed theories of silicification. Jan. 29.—Dr. Ritchie. A view of the differential and integral cal- culus. Feb. 5.—Mr. Brande on the manufacture of paper-hangings. Feb. 12.-Dr. Grant on the structure of fishes, considered with reference to their aqueous element. Feb. 19.—Mr. Faraday on the magnetism of metals as a general character (see page 177). Intelligence and Miscellaneous Articles. $49 Feb, 26.—Dr. Lardner on steam communication witli India. March 4,—Mr. Fox on a mode of laying out and working oblique or askew bridges. (See p. 299 of the present Number.) March |1.—Dr. Arnott on warming and ventilating buildings. March 18.—Mr. Wheatstone on the means of investigating the structure of crystalline bodies by their sonorous vibrations. LXV. Intelligence and Miscellaneous Articles. ON THE ATTRACTIVE AND REPULSIVE FORCES OF MAGNETS AT VERY SMALL DISTANCES. Note applicable to the Correspondence between Professor Ritchie and Mr. R. W. Fox, (see our last four Numbers,) on the attractive and repulsive forces of magnets at very small distances. Extracted by a Correspondent from a paper by W. Snow Harris, Esq., F.R.S., in the Trans. R.S. Edinburgh, 1831; dated July 1, 1827. £ JN the following table are the results of a series of experiments with the attracting and repelling poles. The magnets em- ployed are indicated by the letters a, b, c, d, e, their dimensions be- ing as follows: a, A small cylindrical magnet 2 inches long, 0°2 of an inch in dia- meter, and similar in every respect to the suspended magnet zx [on which its force was exerted ]. , 4°5 inches long, and 0-4 of an inch square, , 70 inches in length, and 0-7 of an inch diameter. , 9:0 inches long, 0:8 of an inch wide, and 0°3 of an inch thick. » 14-0 inches long, 1:0 inch wide, and 0°5 of an inch thick. D signifies the distance ; whilst the letters a, b, c, d, e are placed over the respective forces.” Lee is) ; Dissimilar Poles. Similar Poles. a | 6b e | d e a bie d e 4 oh ae 34+ pe | vse] oes 3-4 Brel os Aae Se 4+ nea iepe Heer etl eae 4° mae, ss ieee Gian) Oe Wesel cselpe caret ine |i 25) . | ne} os 85] 5 eval h tases wes Mec 8+ ie Pog (2504 3 13° | 3 1.202 [O19 les Wh 18s 18) «| .. 3+ | 35+) 165 | & ode freee’) 125/034]! W544 1G ites e! j}iies 4: AD 4) 21: Hwee [lesen lbemaral| aot 4+) 185 0 ec 45 5:5 | 23 estas, lespcenll tide 5+ iO; MEAN Messiaen 55 — 0-28") | eS | se. | ore | 475), 5'5 2G Teed RCo bes WRU ih MD 1° | 15 | 2. 10° 12: 49° 3 15 Q2- | 7% 9: 33° 08) 2+) 3+/15: | 21 acre Nea, 2° | 3° !1o- | 11-9] 4a 06) 4° | 6—|25°-+ 132 ey 3:+:| 5° 114: ,), 14: .| 56° 05) 6°" | Br 3s", | 40 [4° | 65 15:5) 14-4) 60- 0°4| 9° rag : Ot U7: aloo te come *3/15* | |18° | I vos “These experimental results are quite consistent with the opera- tions of the inductive influence [before explained]. We immediately perceive, by referring to the attractive forces, that the law of the in- * At these distances the repulsive force was superseded by attraction, 350 Intelligence and Miscellaneous Articles. verse square of the distance is manifest through all the approximations, except a few of the last, the occasional irregularities observed being very inconsiderable ; so that when the magnets are very nearly approxi- mated in relation to their respective intensities, the increments in the forces begin to decline,—a circumstance of considerable importance in our endeavours to investigate the laws of magnetic attraction ; for it may be supposed that the inductive influence which thus begins to vary, may at last so far vanish, even before contact, that the abso- lute force, at near approximations, may in some instances, as already stated, be in an inverse SIMPLE RATIO OF THE DISTANCE™, and which was observed to happen with the bars marked d and e. For although the cylindrical counterpoise employed in these experiments did not admit of the forces being examined at nearer approximations than those marked in the table, yet by substituting one of large dimensions the forces may be carried on nearly up to the point of contact, so as to be estimated in terms of the preceding progression, since the degrees of attraction may be always compared and valued in grains of abso- lute weight.” ‘In the following table are the results ofthe experiments so con- tinued with the magnets d and e ; the counterpoise being 1:0 inch in diameter, 1° of attraction corresponding to 10° of the former, and being equal to two grains of absolute weight :” Dissimilar Poles. D d | e 0-4 | 6 | 18 0-3 | 85 | 24 0-2 | V3: | 36 “Tt may be perceived in this table, that the corresponding forces at near approximations, do not materially vary from a simple inverse ratio of the distance.” « This deviation from the law of the inverse square of the distance observed in all the near approximations of the magnets may happen either in consequence of the distant polarities having passed a certain limit, or otherwise from the inductive action not going on with the same freedom at some point approaching saturation. The latter would seem to be extremely probable ; for it has been already shown, that when two dissimilar polarities are opposed to each other, their free action becomes more or less neutralized.” ——T7vaus. of Royal So- ciety of Edinburgh, vol. xi. p. 310—312. W. J. A. ON THE AURORA OF THE 18TH NOVEMBER LAST. Communicated by Professor Rigaud. During the beautiful aurora which took place on the 18th of last November, it is remarkable that Mr. Sturgeon was not able to see any of its light excepting in the north. Dr. Robinson, in the last number of the Phil. Mag. (p.236.), has drawn an important conclu- sion from this circumstance; it may be right, therefore, to state * The Italics and capitals in this passage are our Correspondent s.—Eprr. Meteorological Observations of the Royal Society. 351 that in Oxford the streams of light rose and continued for a con- siderable time to pass far beyond the zenith. A little, also, after nine o'clock, an arch like a Jong, luminous, narrow cloud extended from about the E.N.E. or N.E. by E. nearly across the heavens. It appeared to have an altitude of about 60° where it cut the southern meridian. ‘The approximation of this situation to that of the mag- netic equator would have given great value to this phenomenon, if the arch had been more definite in its form, and the place could have been more accurately determined in which itreached the horizon ; but this last circumstance could only be collected from its passing near Jupiter. The Oxford Herald of the 21st mentioned that this arch had been also observed at Banbury. NOTE ON MR. ATKINSON’S PAPER INSERTED IN THE LAST NUMBER OF OUR JOURNAL, PAGE 188. We regret that we should have given currency to a paragraph in the above-mentioned paper, which seems to imply a degree of negli- gence on the part of the Assistant Secretary at the Royal Society’s, whose duty it is to make and record the Meteorological Observations there. If Mr. Atkinson had taken the precaution to make inquiries at the apartments of the Royal Society, he would have found that the anomalies and apparent errors to which he alludes are not owing to want of care and attention on the part of the Assistant Secretary, but to the position in which the instruments are placed ; which position, although evidently not a good one, is the best which the locale of the Society presents. The instruments are all of the best kind, and of superior accuracy and workmanship.—Eprr. METEOROLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS FOR FEBRUARY 1836. Chiswick.—February 1. Slightly overcast : fine. 2, Hazy: rain: baro- meter extremely low. 3. Rain. 4. Wet and stormy. 5. Hazy and cold. 6. Very fine. 7. Drizzly: cloudy and'mild. 8, 9. Overcast. 10. Showery. 11. Clearand cold, 12,Cold and windy. 13.Sharp frost: fine. 14. Fine. 15. Clear and frosty. 16. Frosty. 17, 18. Clear, cold and windy. 19, 20. Sharp frost: fine but cold. 21. Frosty: clear. 22, 23. Overcast. 24, Overcast : fine. 25. Frosty: fine. 26. Sleet; rain. 27. Drizzly. 28. Hazy: cloudy and fine. 29. Overcast. During the first three days of the month the barometer fell remarkably low, and particularly on the 2nd, on which day it was lower than it has probably been for many years in the vicinity of London. The fall of rain was notremarkably great, nor was the temperature at nights below freezing ; but in the country the fall of snow was, at the same time, unusually deep, and the storm so excessively violent that the mails were in many instances obstructed in consequence. Boston.—¥ebruary 1. Cloudy and stormy: rain early a.m. 2. Fine: snow pM. With rain. 3. Cloudy: rain early a.m. 4. Cloudy and stormy : rain P.M. 5. Cloudy. 6. Fine. 7. Cloudy: rain early a.M.; rain p.m. 8. Cloudy: rainr.m. 9. Fine. 10, Rain: rain p.m. 11, Fine and stormy. 12. Stormy. 13.Fine. 14, Cloudy. 15. Fine. 16.Cloudy. 17. Stormy: snow a.M.and p.m. 18. Stormy. 19,20.Fine. 21.Cloudy. 22. Fine. 23—25. Cloudy. 26, Cfoudy: rain rm. 27. Cloudy. 28. Cloudy: raine.M, 29, Rain. €.2h | O-VE | 0-8€ | 88-62% | 889-82 | 1z¢.0¢ | 1€9-6% 8-6€ | £-€€ | P-LE | $1-6% | 88h-6% | O€S-62 | L9z-60} 6 “I ‘ G.gE | EC | Z-VE | 96-82 | OIE-6% | 6LE-62 | Col.6z 33 © “MN LLE | a-VE | 9.9€ | ¥9-82-| 056-8% | LLI-6% | O€L.93] “Ls “sg “a 6-LE | LIE | 9-GE | 0g-8% | 086-8% | 966-8Z | O8Z.gz ay a “ASS. 0-0) | P.2€ | L-VE | CL-8% | 990-62 | 860-62 | £98.92 ‘St “OL “UA “HN £-PV | 6-2 | 9-8€ | Z1-6% | 091-62 | LES-6% | 612.62 | “PSM “MSS ZEP | Z-VE | 0-8E | Lz-6 | €09-6z | 004-62 | 180.62] "fs “aL “MSS L-LE | g-L% | &-6€ | PS-6z | LE8-6z | S7O-0€ | z0g.62| ‘so “IN “MN £-8€ | €-GZ | 1-60 | Z6-63'| 81Z-0£ | LOP-O£ | ogt.o€ 13 © 'N ZOE | C-9% | T-0£ | So-0€ | OST-0€ | VLP-0£ | 1€z.0F 03 Ss s TOF | BIE | OE | £0-0€ | LaE-0£ | OLE-0€ | 611.0€ ‘oh BSE | €-LE | %-8E | 09-62 | 080-08 | ZIE-0F | £68.62 "ST OL 0-6€ | g1f | aE | CP-62 | LLg-6% | PE6-62 | 11.62 “LT (MM “AMS o-LP | ¢-PE | 68E | 08-8% | 606.62 | 668-08 | g/1.08 | “Or “L “MS LLV | a-¥E | G.8€ | 96-62 | 8P-0€ | LZS-0€ | 618-08 “CI “IN : “Ms 9.8V | PE | 9.20 | 16.62 | OFF-0€ | 909:0€ | gcz.o¢ | “Fi © wyeo “M L-zy | €-€€ | LSE | 66-62 | 60P-0€ | 6aF-0F £1G-0F "ot "s “M *A\SS 9-LV | 9c | L-6€ | 96-62 | FOI-0€ | 0Sz-0€ | oF6.6z ‘Ol “A “MN “mS P| GIP | 7-98 | 2.6£ | $¢-6% | 101-0€ | 686-08 | 168.6, | “11 “UL wea "IVA 'S £.0G | 9-SV | LLP | 1¢.6z | $18-6z | LE6-6% 6EL-6% ‘Ol “M “m s “Mss 9:0S | 2-8 | g-LV | SE.6z% | LE6-6z | $90-0€ FSL-6% : ? wyto “x BLP | aL | Z-6€ | 29-62 | 116-62 | $60-08 | Gge.6z wuyeo “MSM LV | BLE | CP | o€.6z | 928.62 | £96.62 | F19.6z “AA “A G-LV | Z€€ | 0-68 | 19.6% | 910.08 | 8£0-08 | oz9.6z go. |uyes “IVA 'N 6-8€ | G.O€ | z-8E | 16.62 | PET-O€ | L2z-0€ | P10-0€ 00g | ta “IA ‘IN | 9-8E | aSE | €.8€ | S¢.6z | F9L-6z | 9LT-0€ | 969.62 1g? |uyeo] Nn N €.6€ | gSE | L-0€ | 92.9% | LE6.8z | OSP-6% OPL-9z See chalet ‘aie ‘asa L-OV | G.SE | 3-8E | 66-92 | 889-82 | L06-8% | gol.gz GLI: | *m | “ms “us 0-SP | €.LE | G.0F | 98.8% | ZIE-6z | LPE-62 | OF 1-6z "t W i ae a E-4 mw | xen | cum PWV 6 ‘ut ae “faenaqa sumed 39 parce? : “MSI at Xe "48 gpl Ta ae Mf 6 ley ¢3] ——— ‘Buuayeoar yas} “eq | WV Fy 2 SS eS ee con . “4 a ; ut “Wl V6 o uojsog Wo ‘ S UW | 4ysog| “MsIyO ‘008 oy ‘yoysog| ‘yormsty9 “u0qsogy “youmstyo DOK 9S8L 205 “AOY :'puo'y : uopuoT ‘ : uopuo’yT as ‘00g ‘hoy : uopuory * suopuo'y “yuo pT “quyod-moq | “Urey “PUTA *AIOUIOULLIYT, 199 WIOIV » Jo sky AO fe Be O o “UOT JV TIFTA “Ly hg pun Suopuory avau ‘younsiy,) qo hjarv0g 7o.unqynouyLozyT ay) fo uapanyd 9y] WW NOSAKOHL “yy 49 £ hunjasoay quojsisspy ayy fig hyaaog pho ayy fo squaupavdpr ay} yp app suonvasasggQ yworFojoLoajapyy THE LONDON ann EDINBURGH PHILOSOPHICAL MAGAZINE AND JOURNAL OF SCIENCE. [THIRD SERIES.] MAY 1836. LXVI. On the Action of Hydrochloric Acid on certain Sul- phates, and particularly on the Sulphate of Copper. By Rosert Kane, M.D. M.R.LA.* HE following experiments were instituted in consequence of some results casually arrived at, whilst engaged on another subject ; and as they possess a certain interest with regard to the theory of the hydracids, and are also additions to the number of real facts in chemistry, I have considered them deserving of the notice of the Royal Irish Academy. When bluestone (S+ Cu) +5 H, is dissolved in liquid mu- riatic acid, there is produced a considerable reduction of tem- perature, viz. from about 65° to about 35°. The solution becomes deep grass green, and by evaporation yields needles of hydrated chloride of copper. If there is taken a quantity of sulphate of copper corresponding to the atomic weight, and a quantity of liquid muriatic acid corresponding to an atom of dry acid, and the solution be effected by heat, on cooling, the whole solidifies into a fibrous mass of hydrated chloride of copper, and there is no bluestone remaining undecomposed. The sulphuric acid remains in the water. When the atomic proportions are not accurately preserved, small crystals of bluestone are scattered through the mass of chloride; but the latter can be obtained pure by carefully attending to this point. In this reaction we have evidently a complete in- * Communicated by the Author, Third Series. Vol. 8. No. 48. May 1836. 2N 354 Dr. Kane on the Action of Hydrochloric Acid on version of the ordinary rules of chemical affinity. The sul- phuric acid ranks much higher in affinitary [?] power than the muriatic acid, and yet is completely displaced by the latter from its state of union with the black oxide of copper. The theory of this reaction is very easily understood. ‘These are (S + Cu +5H)+ CIH, and there are. formed (Cl + Cu) +S+6H. The sudden liberation of the larger quantity of water from its state of solidity in bluestone produces the re- markable reduction of temperature. I have sometimes observed that when the crystallized chlo- ride of copper is allowed to remain for a long time in contact with the strongly acid mother-liquor, a reverse action is set up, and small crystals of sulphate begin to appear disseminated through the mass. I several times analysed these crystals, in order to ascertain whether a sulphate of the chloride of copper, like Peligot’s chromate of the chloride of potassium, would be formed, but without effect ; no definite compound could be detected. The interesting nature of this reaction made it important to ascertain the action of sulphate of copper upon dry muriatic acid gas. ‘The experiments for this purpose were conducted in the following manner. A bulb tube was connected at the ends with strong glass tubes containing fragments of dried chloride of calcium. The one tube was by its other extremity. connected to a retort, in which muriatic acid gas was disen- gaged by the action of oil of vitriol on fused chloride of so- dium. ‘The other desiccating tube was of much smaller size, so as to allow of being weighed in a delicate balance ; to the remote extremity of this a small quill tube was attached, by which the excess of gas made its escape. ‘The sulphate of copper in fine powder was introduced into the weighed bulb tube, and the whole then weighed to determine the quantity employed ; the desiccating tubes were then attached, and the muriatic acid gas disengaged. Having been dried in its pas- sage over the first chloride of calcium, it came into contact with the bluestone, by which it was rapidly absorbed; and any water that was formed or disengaged, carried away by the current of dry gas in excess, was deposited in the small de- siccating tube, where its quantity could be accurately deter- mined. When the crystallized bluestone (S Cu+5 H) in fine pow- der is put into the tube, it absorbs rapidly thé$muriatic acid gas, and becomes grass green: great heat is produced. Drops of moisture appear on the cold portions of the tube. It loses certain Sulphates, and particularly Sulphate of Copper. 355 its pulverulent texture, and is converted into a mass of silky pale green crystals: on the heated portions of tube, points of a chocolate brown matter are produced. The current of gas being continued until all action ceased, and the tube and its contents had cooled to the ordinary temperature of the room, the apparatus was weighed, and the bluestone was found to have absorbed rather more than one atom of muriatic acid, the excess being attributed to the quantity absorbed by the water disengaged. The mass of green crystals thus obtained is very delique- scent, excessively acid, and gives fumes, arising probably from some muriatic acid in excess. Dissolved in water it yields by crystallization the hydrated chloride of copper in long needles. When there is used sulphate of copper, either quite dry, or retaining one atom of water, the effect is so nearly similar as to allow of the same description serving for both. S Cu or S Cu H absorb muriatic acid rapidly, and assume a dark chocolate brown colour. The mass becomes slightly coherent as if some water became free; but the second desic- cating tube does not increase in weight in any perceptible de- gree. The process is accompanied by the evolution of so much heat as occasionally to crack the tubes; but the passage of the gas must be continued for a long time after the whole has become cold. The amount of gas absorbed then approxi- mates very closely to one atom, but it seldom absolutely at- tains the theoretical quantity; it can approach, however, within one per cent., and we may consequently consider that one atom is the quantity absorbed. This brown matter is possessed of interesting properties. When heated it gradually and readily parts with its muriatic acid gas, leaving behind the sulphate of copper unaltered. Exposed to the air it rapidly absorbs water, with the evolution of heat, and becomes apple green, a change which occurs instantaneously if a few drops of water be allowed to fall upon it. Dissolved in water it forms an apple green solution ; and by crystallization gives the crystallized chloride of copper, sulphuric acid remaining in the liquor. Two theories may be conceived of the nature of the body thus formed: One, that the chloride of hydrogen is absorbed by the sulphate of copper and combines with it as water would do,—that, in fact, the so-called muriatic acid is capable of re- placing the water of crystallization of salts as ammonia and phosphuretted hydrogen have been shown to do by Rose and Graham: The other, that the chloride of hydrogen reacting on the oxide of copper forms water and chloride of copper, 2N 2 356 Dr.Kane on the Action of Hydrochloric Acid on Sulphates. while the latter with the sulphuric acid constitutes a sulphate ofa chloride. The general nature of its properties inclines me to believe the former to be the true idea, that the chloride of hydrogen exists as such in the brown powder, and that chloride of copper is only formed when the decomposition is effected with the presence of much water. The singular results of the reaction just described render- ing an examination of the influence of muriatic acid on the sulphates in general highly interesting, experiments were in- stituted, of which the results shall be very briefly stated. — Dry muriatic acid was passed over sulphates in the appa- ratus before described. With the sulphates of potash, soda, zinc, magnesia, iron, alumina, and lead, no action was ob- served ; these salts did not change in weight or in appearance. On the other hand, the sulphates of nickel and of quicksilver absorb muriatic acid very gradually, with the evolution of heat, the absorption ceasing when half an atom has been taken up. These compounds lose the gas they had absorbed, by exposure to the air during some time, and immediately on being heated. If they be put into water, the sulphate is de- posited pure, the muriatic acid remaining in the water. Sulphate of potash dissolves in liquid muriatic acid with some evolution of heat; and if by means of heat two atoms of sulphate of potash be dissolved in a quantity of liquid con- taining an atom of real muriatic acid, there separate on cooling finely formed crystals (rhomboidal plates) of bisulphate of potash, with opake cubes of chloride of potassium. A great number of analyses of the crystals obtained by such reaction was made to determine whether the sulphate of chlorkalium corresponding with the chromate had any existence, but no trace of its being formed could be obtained. Bisulphate of potash crystallizes from its solution in liquid muriatic acid unaltered. Sulphate of ammonia similarly treated gives pre- cisely similar results. It has been long known that Glauber’s salt treated with muriatic acid constitutes a powerful freezing mixture, the theory of which is at once explained by the results of the expe- riment. When sulphate of soda is dissolved in liquid muriatic acid there are formed bisulphate of soda and chloride of so- dium, and as the former salt crystallizes only with four atoms of water, the remaining quantity of the water of crystallization of the Glauber’s salt is disengaged, to the amount of sixteen atoms: thus, 2 {(S+Na)10 H}+(Cl+H) = {(2 S+Na) +4 H)} +(Cl+ Na) +17 H. Mr. Hopkins’s Abstract of his Memoir on Physical Geology. 357 This large quantity of water suddenly separated from a state of combination in which it had been solid, produces, by its absorption of caloric of liquidity, the frigorific property. The sulphates of zinc and magnesia dissolve in muriatice acid, and by cooling or evaporation are obtained unaltered. The muriatic acid does not appear to produce any change of nature. When protosulphate of iron is dissolved in muriatic acid, the liquor furnishes by crystallization quantities of unaltered sulphate and of chloride of iron. Sometimes the sulphate re- tains its common quantity of water of crystallization, but at others I have obtained a salt giving by analysis: Sulphuric acid 18°7 S = 195 Protoxide of iron 16°7 Fe = 17°3 Water and loss 14°6 gH = 13-2 50°0 50:0 The crystals were always so aggregated that their form could not be accurately determined ; they are transparent, harder, and of a much lighter green than ordinary copperas ; they are quite permanent, and when dissolved in water give sulphate of iron with the ordinary quantity of water. The sulphate of alumina crystallizes unaltered from its so- lution in muriatic acid, bué in more beautiful plates than from water. From the solution of sulphate of nickel or of mer- cury in muriatic acid, these salts are deposited by crystalliza- tion unchanged. 23, Lower Gloucester Street, Dublin: March 25, 1836. LXVII. An Abstract of a Memoir on Physical Geology ; with a further Exposition of certain Points connected with the Subject. By W. Horxiys, £sq., M.A., F.G.S., of St. Peter’s College, Cambridge. [Continued from p. 281, and concluded. ] IV. npHE two systems of fissures which I have described are those which must be regarded according to this theory as primary phenomena, from which, as before stated, the secondary phenomena of mineral veins, faults, anticlinal lines, &c., must be derived. For this second part of the sub- ject, I must refer to the second Section of my Memoir, where T have entered in detail into the manner in which these latter phienomena may be conceived to be derived from the former. The number of phenomena which we are thus enabled to account for, as the consequences of a simple cause from which 358 Mr. Hopkins’s Abstract of his Memoir on Physical Geology. they are deducible by strict mechanical reasoning, appears to me, in the present state of our speculations and practical knowledge, to give to the theory 1 have been attempting to develop the strongest claim to the attention of geologists. It will be observed, that a most essential part of this theory consists in the relation which it assigns between the directions of dislocation and the general configuration of the elevated mass at the instant previous to its rupture. It may, at first sight, appear impossible to ascertain what this form may have been, now that we can only examine the mass in its dislocated state; but this difficulty, though it must always exist in a greater or less degree, will not appear so serious a practical one, when we consider that since necessary relations must exist between the form of the mass at the instant above men- tioned, and the lines of dislocation, and again between these lines and the actual disturbed form of the mass, some such relations must also exist between this latter and the previous form. Thus if the actual form be approximately conical, we may conclude it to have been also conical at the instant of dislocation; and if the disturbed district be of great length as compared with its width, and presents a well-defined axis of elevation, we may conclude the unbroken elevation to have been approximately cylindrical. Partial elevations which may have been superimposed upon a general one, as already de- scribed, at the instant previous to dislocation, must generally be more difficult to detect, since it*may frequently be impos- sible to distinguish present indications of them from similar elevations which may have been produced by the elevatory force entirely subsequently to the formation of the fissures. On such points the observer must of course exercise his dis- crimination and judgement. Deviations from rectilinearity or parallelism in the lines of dislocation are not to be regarded necessarily as anomalies. We frequently speak, it is true, of the law of parallelism in such phaenomena, as if that were their essential characteristic, but it is manifest that, according to our theory, this is only a secondary property in them, de- pending on the rectilinearity of the general axis of elevation. In conical elevations such as those before alluded to (p. 233) there is no approximation to parallelism in the observed fis- sures; and if the general axis of elevation be curvilinear, the longitudinal fissures preserving their parallelism with it (ac- cording to theory) will be also curvilinear, while the trans- verse fissures perpendicular to the former at their points of intersection will no longer be parallel. ‘These deviations from rectilinearity and parallelism are due to the action of the ge- neral elevatory force, and to the nature of the general eleva- Mr. Hopkins’s Abstract of his Memoir on Physical Geoiogy. 359 tion. Others more limited may be due to partial elevations. Where they are observed, the local configuration of the mass must be examined, and thence the directions of the conse- quent tensions superimposed on that of the general mass must be inferred. The equation of.page 273 will then determine the resulting directions of the fissures, and therefore the nature of the deviations. In simple cases, the remarks in page 276-277 will enable us to do this with sufficient accuracy to compare the theoretical deduction with the observed pheenomena, V. It has already. been stated, that all consideration of those portions of the earth’s crust, in which a regularly jointed or laminated structure may have prevailed previous to their elevation, has been excluded from the investigations contained in my memoir, because I wished to keep them distinct. from any speculations respecting the operation of other causes than the one whose effects I proposed to develop. In our general speculations, however, on theories of elevation, it is necessary to consider how far these dislocations which, according to the theory I have been discussing, must be regarded as primary phenomena, areanything more than secondary ones, depending on lines of less resistance, produced by some such particular structure as that above mentioned. Much valuable informa- tion respecting joints may be expected from the forthcoming work of Professor Phillips on the Geology of Yorkshire; but at present we know but little accurately about this important feature in the structure of rocks, and of its cause, I conceive, absolutely nothing. We have, therefore, no positive reason to conclude that this peculiarity of structure has generally been superinduced after the elevation of the mass in which it exists, though in some cases there appears little doubt of such having been the fact. It is highly important, however, to determine whether any perfect coincidence does exist in the directions of dislocation, and of joints in the same district ; and it is to be hoped that geologists will direct their earnest attention to this subject. Should this coincidence be esta- blished generally in districts where the fractures are parallel and at right angles to each other, it will still be important to ascertain how far it exists in elevations approximating to the conical form ; and, in all cases, whether the directions of joints bear any relations to the configuration of the mass, as mo- dified by partial elevations. All these are points of interest which we may hope by accurate and careful observation to determine. Should the coincidence, however, between joints and lines of fracture be perfectly established, we shall still have to consider whether the joints, by their prior existence in the undisturbed mass, have determined the lines of fracture, or 360 Mr. Hopkins’s Abstract of his Memoir on Physical Geology. [whether] these latter phanomena have exercised an influence in determining the positions of the joints, supposed to be sub- sequently formed in the elevated mass. Now, assuming the coincidence just mentioned, there must of course be the same relations between the general conformation of the elevated mass and the directions of joints, as those which have been already stated to exist between that conformation and lines of dislocation; and therefore, if we assume the prior existence of joints, and also that the lines or axes of elevation have been principally determined by the points of application of the ele- vatory force in the lower portion of the elevated mass, we must necessarily conclude, that some relation must exist between the causes which have produced the jointed structure, and the action of the elevatory force; 7. e. between the action of a force extraneous to the mass, and that internal molecular action, to which it would seem absolutely necessary to refer the formation of joints in the undisturbed mass. ‘To assert such relation to be physically impossible, would, in the present state of our knowledge, perhaps, be absurd; but it does appear to me that the difficulty of conceiving it is so great as to form a most se- rious, if not a fatal objection, to any theory in which it should be involved as a necessary consequence. To avoid this ob- jection, we might proceed on the hypothesis, that the lines or axes of elevation have been principally determined by the lines of less resistance along the joints, rather than as above sup- posed; and such might be the case, if the principal line of action of the elevatory force* should not deviate materially from either of the two directions at right angles to each other in which we are assuming joints to exist. If, however, that principal line should approximate to an angle of 45° with these rectangular directions, and should be of considerable length, the hypothesis would be, [ conceive, altogether inadmissible. Supposing then the accurate coincidence of the directions of joints and those of fracture to be hereafter established, it would appear that the hypothesis of the laws discoverable in lines of fracture being generally due to the prior existence of some regular structure in the undisturbed mass, would still involve serious difficulties, on account of the relations existing so generally between the lines of fracture and the configuration of the elevated mass, for which, with the above hypothesis, it * It must be recollected that we can only judge of the superficial form and dimensions of the mass to which the elevatory force has been applied, by those of the actual elevations. These appear unquestionably, I conceive, to justify the notion of sufficiently determinate lines of action of the ele- vatory force, at least in a sufficient number of instances to give due weight to the argument in the text. Mr. Hopkins’s Abstract of his Memoir on Physical Geology. 361 seems almost impossible to conceive any efficient physical cause. On the other hand (still supposing the coincidence of the directions of joints and of lines of fracture), if we assume the formation of joints to have been posterior to the elevation of the mass, this coincidence will still remain to be accounted for. Our ignorance, however, of the process by which this structure may have been superinduced, will not at present allow us to do this. The fact must continue to offer a theo- retical difficulty, but one, I conceive, very different in its nature to that above stated, since it would appear, I think, probable that, taking a portion of the elevated mass bounded by adjoining fissures, the position of the joints subsequently formed in it should have some relations to the boundaries of that portion. The fact, therefore, of the coincidence (or rather parallelism) of direction above mentioned, while it presents a difficulty, does not seem to offer any @ priori objection to the theory which involves it. It is proper, however, to observe that though it should appear, for the reasons now stated, that a preference may generally be due to the theory which would assign the production of fissures to the elevatory force alone, we should by no means be justified in the rejection in every instance of that which attributes the directions of those fissures to the previous structure of the mass, and especially in those cases in which we fail to recognise distinct lines of elevation, or the usual relations between them and the lines of dislo- cation. And here it may be remarked as a striking fact, that the only mining district in this country in which there is any difficulty (as far as I have yet ascertained) in tracing these relations, is that in which, for independent reasons, it appears most necessary to recognise the influence ofa previously veined or jointed structure on the directions of its dislocations. I allude to the mining district of Cornwall. In the above reasoning I have assumed the accurate coin- cidence of the directions of joints and of lines of fracture, and it is important to observe that this accuracy of coincidence is essential to the theory which would assign the latter phzeno- mena to the prior existence of the former. A difference of a few degrees in the angular positions of the above lines would, if iehats established, be fatal to this theory, because, as I have already explained, although a fissure produced by an eleva- tory force would cross a line of less resistance under a certain condition, without change of direction, that condition cannot be generally satisfied when the angle between the fissure and line of less resistance is small, and in such case the fissure will be propagated exactly along the latter line. Observations on this point would therefore demand great care and accuracy. Third Series. Vol. 8. No. 48. May 1836. 20 362 Mr. Hopkins’s Abstract of his Memoir on Physical Geology. It is also important to remark, that the accurate coincidence above spoken of will require two coexisting systems of joints to be at right angles to each other, since such is the law recog- nised in lines of dislocation. Observation, however, so far as it has proceeded, appears in many instances, I believe, to con- tradict this law in the directions of joints. Should any other laws be established hereafter, or very frequent deviations from the one just mentioned, it will probably be found necessary to abandon altogether the notion that lines of dislocation have been principally determined by the directions of joints, rather - than by the mode of action of the elevatory force. The theory which it has been the object of my memoir to develope, enables us to account for nearly all the more im- portant phenomena of elevation; but before we finally decide on its relative claims to our adoption, we are manifestly called upon to remove as far as possible, by accurate observation, the uncertainty which still remains respecting the possible in- fluence of a jointed structure in producing what I have termed the primary phzenomena of elevation. ‘These speculations are thrown out with the hope of indicating some of the more cri- tical points of inquiry on which the ultimate determination of this question must turn, and which are generally best indicated in such cases by theoretical discussion. The necessary re- lations which I have shown must exist, according to one of these theories, between the directions of dislocation and the general, and in some cases local, conformation of the elevated mass, will probably do much towards enabling us ultimately to decide between them; and it is therefore of the first im- portance that the observer who may hereafter wish to eluci- date this subject, should remark these relations as carefully as those which may exist between the dislocations themselves, or the joints with which they may be associated *. We may here observe, that the only difference between the two theories we have considered, consists in the cause which they assign for what I have termed, with reference to the * It would be important, as before intimated, to observe the directions of joints in a conical elevation with lines of dislocation diverging from its vertex. [am not aware that the existence of a similarly diverging system of joints has ever been suspected. It would also be highly desirable to ob- serve whether there be any continuity in the joints of two contiguous but distinct formations, and particularly when one formation is primary and the other. sedimentary. The perfect continuity of the veins in Cornwall, in passing from the killas to the granite, forms a curious feature in the geology of that district, if we are to regard the former as a sedimentary deposit. In such case, it would clearly demonstrate that the regular structure to which, I conceive, many of those veins must be referred, was superinduced in that district after the great dislocations which must have accompanied the injection of the granite. Mr. Hopkins’s Abstract of his Memoir on Physical Geology. $63 theory with which I have been more particularly occupied, primary phenomena. The secondary phenomena of faults, mineral veins, anticlinal lines, valleys, &c., will be deducible from the primary ones just in the same manner in both theo- ries, so that nearly the whole of the investigations contained in the second section of my memoir will be equally applicable to both these theories. In that section I have entered, as before intimated, with considerable detail into an examination of the secondary phe- nomena of elevation, such as anticlinal lines, longitudinal and transverse valleys, ejected and injected horizontal beds of trap, veins of trap and granite; and also the different phenomena of mineral veins, such as the throw and depth of a vein, the comparative widths of the best bearing veins and cross courses, and the shifts or heaves so frequently recognised at the inter- sections of veins. I have also stated reasons for concluding that the fissures of mineral veins must have been filled by some process of infiltration or segregation (which I profess not further to define) from the surrounding mass; and here, viewing this point with reference to the subject of joints, I would further observe, that the formation of a vein (by which is here meant the matter contained in the fissure) might take place along an open joint, exactly in the same manner as along a fissure pro- duced by any other means. If, therefore, we find veins (such as those before alluded to in Cornwall) which cannot be sup- posed to originate in the dislocating effects of an elevatory force, we should carefully examine how far the directions of these veins appear to coincide with those of the leading joints. From a hasty inspection of the Cornish veins, I have a strong impression that this coincidence will be found to exist in that district. It would be important to ascértain this fact by care- ful and detailed observation; for, should it be established, it will immediately destroy the hypothesis of the contemporaneous formation of such veins as a necessary alternative, and at least remove one inconceivable process from the speculations of geologists, more especially with respect to those who may at once be disposed to allow this mode of formation of the Corn- ish veins, while they contend for the fact of the mass in which they are found being a sedimentary deposit. The difficulty of the theory of all similar veins will be reduced by my hy- pothesis to that of the formation of joints, a process hard enough to conceive, but which has its analogy in that of cry- stallization, and must of necessity be recognised. ‘The pro- cess of contemporaneous formation of veins, without the pre- vious formation of fissures as receptacles for the segregated or infiltrated matter, appears to me inconceivable in itself, and 202: $64 Mr. Hopkins’s Abstract of his Memoir on Physical Geology unsupported by any analogies drawn from the known opera- tions of nature. VI. There is another point on which I have touched inci- dentally in the conclusion of my memoir—the application of the principles already explained to the theory of Elie de Beau- mont, respecting the parallelism of mountain-chains of con- temporaneous elevation. I have before stated, that in what- ever manner we may conceive an elevatory force to be pro- duced, there seems no reason why we should not suppose it, in some cases, to have acted at a much greater depth than in others. Now I have already explained (p. 278) the reason for concluding that the formation of a system of fissures, ac- cording to our theory, must be simultaneous; and also how the simultaneous formation is facilitated by the circumstance of time being necessary for the transmission of the relaxation of the mass produced by the opening of a fissure. From that explanation it will easily be seen, that if a number of fissures commence simultaneously in the lower portion * of an elevated mass of great thickness, and great superficial extent, it is most probable that those only will reach the upper surface which are remote from each other. These fissures will be large, and all the phenomena resulting from them may be expected to be on a proportionate scale. Anticlinal lines + will almost necessarily be formed along them; and thus it is as easy to account for two parallel mountain ranges, as for two neigh- bouring anticlinal lines on a scale of comparatively small mag- nitude; and our theory will thus assign a physical cause for the Jaw of parallelism in mountain chains of contemporaneous elevation, as contended for by M. Elie de Beaumont, if, at least, the application of that geologist’s theory be restricted within certain limits. I have no intention, however, of now insisting on this extensive action of the physical cause I have been considering ; but I would observe, that the extent of this action can only be determined by that of those portions of the earth’s surface throughout which the laws of observed phzeno- mena may be continuous, and in accordance with our theore- tical deductions. To persons not habituated to the investigation of the accu- rate relations between mechanical causes and their effects, much of the previous reasoning may appear too refined to be applicable to our subject; but it must always be recollected, that this reasoning is immediately applied to hypothetical pro- * Lhave shown that these fissures must generally commence in some lower portion of the elevated mass. See Memoir, p. 43. + See Memoir, p. 51. Mr. Hopkins’s Abstract of his Memoir on Physical Geology. 365 blems, to which it is strictly applicable, and which are chosen so as to bear the closest analogy to the corresponding ones which nature presents to us; and it is simply on the strictness of this analogy that we are called upon to decide, in judging of the admissibility of our mode of investigation. It is im- portant to have a clear conception of this principle, on which the application of strict analysis to the problems of nature must always be made. In fact, this is the principle on which every one must tacitly (sometimes perhaps unconsciously) pro- ceed, in forming a distinct idea of the necessary relations be- tween any physical cause acting under complicated conditions, and its remoter consequences. We must form our conclu- sions from the consideration of some comparatively simple but strictly analogous case, and apply them to the actual one, with such limitations as circumstances may require. The advantage which the mathematician possesses, consists in this —that the standard case to which he refers his more complex problem, is a definite one, from which he has means of de- ducing his results free from that uncertainty which necessarily attends other modes of investigation. It is a standard case of this kind, which I have endeavoured to supply for geological theories of elevation; nor am I without hopes, that the attempt may at least so far succeed as to remove some of that inde- finiteness on this subject, by which the earlier speculations in every science must almost necessarily be characterized. More particularly, perhaps, may this be asserted of geology, which, notwithstanding the rapidity of its growth, is yet hardly strong enough to emerge from the cloudiness in which its phraseo- logy alone, with reference to the phenomena of elevation, by addressing itself more to the imagination than the judgement of the student, has sometimes been sufficient to involve it. An impression has thus been too frequently created, that little hope exists of elevating the science to any rank among the stricter physical sciences. Such a notion, however, appears to me most fatal to its healthy progress. The author of the Principles of Geology, whatever may be thought of some of his theoretical views, must be allowed by all to have set us an example well calculated to improve in this respect the tone of ' geological speculation, in as much as he has boldly grappled with the difficulties of his problems in detail, and not been content to meet them with indeterminate generalities. In these investigations I have endeavoured to act upon the same principle, as the only one on which, if we are to speculate at all, we can speculate with safety; and if, perchance, a some- what vagué and misty sublimity which has appertained to this 366 Sir P, G. Egerton’s Catalogue of Fossil Fish branch of the science should thus be diminished, ample com- pensation will be made if we should in return confer upon it a portion, however small, of the more naked dignity of de- monstrative truth. St. Peter’s College, Jan. 7, 1836. LXVIII. Catalogue of Fossil Fish in the Collections of Lord Cole and Sir Philip Grey Egerton, arranged alphabetically ; with References to the Localities, Geological Positions, and | published Descriptions of the Species. By Sir Puivip DE Matpas Grey Ecerton, M.P., F.R.S., £.G.S. To the Editors of the Philosophical Maguzine and Journal. GENTLEMEN, Be following “ Catalogue of Fossil Fish” was printed for private distribution, but I am induced tosolicit its insertion in your widely-circulated Journal in the hopes that it may prove of interest beyond the immediate pale of my personal friends and acquaintance ;—to the geological adept, as exhi- biting in a tabular form the stratigraphical position of two hundred and twenty-seven species,—to the student in fossil ichthyology, as affording a clue to the depositories of many new and rare specimens destined to appear in the forth- coming numbers of Dr. Agassiz’s ‘ Recherches sur les Poissons Fossiles.” To the discriminating eye and classic orthography of that distinguished naturalist I am indebted for the diagnosis and nomenclature of the new genera and species enumerated in the Catalogue, as well as for the identification of such as were raleady known. I remain, Gentlemen, yours, &c. Oulton Park, Feb. 6, 1836. Puitie Grey Ecerton. The letter c ore prefixed to a species denotes the Collection to which it belongs when not common to both. GENUS AND SPECIES. STRATA AND LOCALITIES. Acanthoderma spinosum ..... Engi, canton Glaris. Acanus oblongus* .......... Engi, canton Glaris. c new species not yet named Engi, canton Glaris. gE Acipenser, new species not yet nMed Fe 6 ..... (Lias.) Lyme Regis. Acrodus nobilis ..........-- (Lias.) Lyme Regis. c gibberulus .,.... .. (Lias.) Lyme Regis. * This genus is found in the Planer Kalk. LP LAr Fw 9) s and Lord Cole’s Collections. 376. 6) : IES. STRATA AND LOCALITIES. $ wEPe ies. (Lias.) Brunswick. dé tti .w.gle... (Lias.) Brunswick. whe 6 med........ (Lias.) Lyme Regis. » erygius. By q BG MS. (Coal Formation.) Lebach. @\3 ss. Agass. vol. Re We ose (Coal Formation.) Lebach. _— , Agass.vol.ii. ee Gee (Coal Formation.) Lebach. & ¢ oterus. Agass. Si: hind A Franc aPt ics ote (Coal Formation.) Lebach. 5 j, @eine +.) Engi, canton Glaris. = . lanum...... Engi, canton Glaris. pleurum »... Engi, canton Glaris. > ATM re) 01a Engi, canton Glaris. = » RS tats UR Engi, canton Glaris. z 7 icutirostris .. (Oolite.) Solenhofen. ¢ bularis.w.... (Oolite.) Solenhofen. ~ miradiatus r;. (Oolite.) Stonesfield. 3 ssimus w..... (Kimmeridge Clay.) Shotover Hill. - sphala .....% (Tertiary Beds.) Monte Bolca. ° itosteus #1... (Oolite.) Stonesfield. - .™ Geology of SU (Chalk.) Sussex. = salis. Agass. LE Le ee (Tertiary Beds.) Monte Bolca. 2 serratus t.... (Tertiary Beds.) Malta. § odon. Agass. aj. VM. Stee .. (Tertiary Beds.) Malta. — CEUSI Sy 5.-)0\0 0/0 (Tertiary Beds.) Malta. e~ (AGO Wise 3.4 North America. z lotis.» 3 D, H'—H is to be sub- tracted from the greater altitude, and the change of declina- tion to be added thereto; the same method is to be followed when the distance of the moon’s remote limb from a star is observed. It being, however, not so much an error in the al- titude as an error in the refraction that materially affects the calculation, and this refraction not being sensibly altered by a few seconds of difference of altitude, the change of refraction may safely be neglected. For the apparent altitudes of the points of contact of the sun and moon above the horizon, compute strictly the refractions g and e’ with regard to baro- meter and thermometer, and add the sum of these refractions to the observed distance of the limbs. From the same appa- rent altitudes of the points of contact above the sensible hori- zon, find, by applying thereto the above-stated reduction, the altitudes H’ and /’ with respect to the true zenith, and de- duct from each the corresponding refraction found before, and compute for the rest the parallaxes in altitude z and 7’, and reducing Lunar Observations. 377 subtract their sum ++’ from the observed distance augmented by the refractions, and call the remainder d + ¢ + oe’ —2— 7! Find also for each altitude the corrections g—z and ¢/ —7'; then is gees COS (H'+3d—A’).(e—7) __ cos (2'+3d+A').(e!—7') cos H’cos(id—A') . cosh’ cos(1d+A ) 4 00s (H’ +3 4d—A’) cos [H'— (3 d—A')] (g—z)?. sin 1” 2 tan d cos* H’ cos? (1 d— A’) 4, 88 (A! +4 d+A) cos [h'—($ d+ A')] (g!—2z!)?. sin 1! me 2 tan d cos* h’ cos? (1 d— A’) ae If we call the first correction «, the second £, then is: y sin 1/ baba BH (pe baat (fa 3 A ay to which both horizontal semidiameters are to be added to find the true distance of the centres. The square of the sun’s correction can always be neglected, and that even of the moon’s correction disappears when d is near 90°, or when the moon’s correction is small. All four corrections disappear when the distance is the supplement of the sum of the altitudes ; but when the distance is equal to the difference of the altitudes, all other corrections vanish except the first one, which be- comes = 2 (p—7). The first two corrections only, however, need be computed, as the others can be taken as a small third correction from a table contained in most nautical works, with its sign, which becomes negative when 6>90; so that this method has the ad- vantage that no difference of cases need be attended to, as in that of Witchell’s, whose example I have followed in the com- putation of it. For if we call, of the two first corrections, the one proceeding from the sun S and that from the moon M, then is, § = 6— S+M+ third correction, which latter one, in the absence of the tables, may be found by the formula ((’s corr. —} M).M cot 6 sin 1", To the semidiameters, which are to be added to the ob- served distance to obtain the apparent distance of the centres, a correction should be applied on account of inclination to the horizon, for which Mendoza Rios has given a table. This inclination to the horizon is found by sin. inclination = sin Hsec(4D— A). In the subsequent example this incli- nation is = 90°; so that the vertical semidiameters have been used. As however the distance of the centres enters only into Third Series. Vol. 8. No. 48. May 1836. 2Q 378 Mr. Rumker’s new Method of the approximative calculation, the correction for inclinatron may be omitted in this method. To illustrate this method we shall choose the example given by Professor Schumacher in his Ephemeris for 1835, which from 21 feet elevation come the following : ist Example. Jun 172° 22! E. longitude, above the level of the sea would be- e 18, 1835, in 23° 57' N. latitude, and the following observations were made. Therm. 90 Fahr.; barom. 28°6 Engl. © Lower Limb. 83 55 35 Dip — 4 21 83 51 14 ©’s semid. + 15 45 App.alt. 84 6 59 Red. to true zen. + 35 © Upper Limb. 5 15 50 Bos et sae tee anee — 4 21 5 11 29 C’s hor. semid. 15 4 Refraction —20 —14 45 vert.semid. Parallax +1 H= 84 7 34 Ap. alt. above hor. 4 56 44 Reduct. to true zen. +1 23 EEN G/ Observed Distance of Limbs. d = 90 17 16 4d= 45 8 38 semid. © = 7 15 45 r= 15 45 semid. (« = 7! 14 45 A. =, 39°37 57 90 47 46 = D 4D= 45 23 53 A’ = 39 38 27 Calculation. H 84 7 34 he a8 9 H+h 89 5 41 4(H+h) 44 32 50 cot 0-006864 H—h 79 9 27 4(H—A) 39 34 43 tan 9-917318 4D 45 23 53 cot 9-993966 A 39 37 57 tan 9-918148 4D—A 5 45 56 tan 9-0042 3D+A 85 7 50 tan 1-0607 H 84 7 34 tan 0-9877 hk 458 7 tan 8-9392 r 15 45 log 29754 7 15 5 log 2-9567 H’—H_ 15 27 log 2:9673 h'—h 15 5 log 2:9567 App.alt.84 6 59 App.alt. 4 56 44 84 22 26 refr. ¢/=10! 5 11 49 Reduc. zen. 309 Change refr. fork'—h = 20 H' 84 23 1 5 11 29 refr. R = 8! 19" Refract. 5 Red, zen. 1 23 84 22 56 par, «= | 5 12 52 — Ref. 819 r—-- = —4 eee ae P_R = + 46 42 5 4.33. pat. R=> 60 1 P+x—-e—-R = 46 38 P—R = +46 42 d= 9017 16 3 = 89 30 38 reducing Lunar Observations. 379 3445 8 38 4445 8 38 A! 39 38 27 A! 39 38 27 4d—A'= 5 3011 sec 000201 4d+A!’ 84 47 5 sec 1-04144 H’ 84 23 1 sec 1-00936 h' 5 12 52 sec 0-00180 H’+3d—A’ 89 53 12 cos 7-29623 h'+3d+A! 89 59 57 cos 5:16270 e—x = 4" log 0-60206 R'—P’ — 46! 42" log 3-44747 Se — 0-08 log 8-:90966 M = + 0"-45 log 9-65341 Vi + 0-45 5= 89 30 38-00 §= 89 30 38-37 —— 15 45 = 15 4 ———————— Diff. True pa : a 0° 1! 241.6 pr. log. 92-1065 From Nautical Alm. prap. log. for midnigh 0°3250 Mean time at Greenwich 12 2 58:5 pr. log 1°7815 Mean time on board 23 34 52:0 Longitude 11 31 53-5 East. 2nd Example. October 16, 1835, in 53° 33’ N. latitude, and 9° 58! E. longitude, at 10 A.M, mean time, the following altitudes of the sun’s and moon’s lower limb and distance of their limbs were observed. Elevation of the eye 20 feet. Barom. 30°2; therm. 40. © ») 23 41 31 45 30 0 Dip — 415 dip — 415 23 47 16 45 25 45 Dim. for refr. aug. for par. © semid. 16 4: 6 (’shor.sem.15 18-7 o0}+ 16 26 103 28:8 ee dim. for ref. 0:4 23 53 186 ee eS Reduction + 9 31:0 45 41 13:8 — Reduction + 4 53 i= iP4 nw Qv49: ———E H 45 44 68 Distance. d = 72 41 13 kd = 36 20 365 15 29:2 r= 15 29:2 16 46 A= 20 18 38:0 D= 73 12 46:8 56 54 44-0 4D 36 36 23:0 A' = 20 18 21:0 2Q2 380 Mr. Rumker’s new Method of H=45 46 7 A=24 2 50 H+h=69 38 57 3(H+A) 34 54 28 cot 0-1562619 H—A=21 43 16 4(H—A) 10 51 38 tan 9-2829749 $D 36 36 23 cot 0-1291056 A 20 18 38 tan 9-5683424 (4 D—A) 16 17 49 tan9:46589 (4D+A)56 55 1 tan 0-18611 — H 45 46 7 tan 0-01165 h 24 250 tan 9-64954 7 15 29 log 2:96801 r 16 5 log 2-98453 H'—H 4! 39" log 244556 hi—h 11! 1" — Jog 282018 45 41 14 23 53 19 45 45 53 refr. 0! 58’) Reduction + 4 53 H’ = 45 50 46 Refraction 58 45 49 48 parall. 39’ 41 e—x = — 38' 6".0 g—n = + 2 555 e—x+e—7' = — 36 055 d = 72 41 13-0 3 72 5 12"5 4d = 36 20 36 $d A! = 20 18 21 Al (;d—A') 16 215. sec 0-01724 Ad+A! H’ = 45 49 48 sec 0-15690 h! H’+4d—A'= 61 52 3 cos 9-67349 = =h'+3d+A'= e—= = 38 6 log 335908 e'— a! M = + 26 49-5 log 3:20671 S= = 39°7 3 = 72 5 125 72 31 22:3 3rd corr. + 36 6 = 72 31 259 jp == 15 18:7 r= 16 46 y —- Diff. True dist. of centres oe rs ee 0° 9" 49!"8 ... pr. log. 12627 From Nautical Almanac pr. log. 0'3111 eeeeee Mean time at Greenwich 21 20 7 Mean time at ship 22 0 0 Longitude in time 0 39 53 Kast. pr. log. 0°9516 24 4 20 ref. cor. 2'13'"2 + 9 31 24 13 51 parallax 7-7 e'—r" 2 5:5 36° 20! 36" 20 18 21_ 56 38 57 sec 0-25982 — 24 13 51 sec 0-04005 — 80 52 48 cos 9-20004 © 2' 5"5 log 209864 , 39-68 log 1-59855 — reducing Lunar Observations. 381 The third correction is to rectify the error committed in assuming one side of a spherical jtriangle equal to the adja- cent segment of its base cut off by a perpendicular from the vertex of the opposite angle, which error will diminish with the angle contained between the above side and the base. Suppose a and c to be two sides of a triangle, and } and d their adjacent segments, and » = a — 6, then is tan $p _ tan} (c—d).tan § (c+d) iF ian(O+$u) approximations, supposing it in a first one = 0. But tan} (c —d).tan}(c+d) = tan’? 3A, if we denote by A the tang? 5A tang (b+ #) Whence we find the following general expression for iy, which may be reduced accordingly as circumstances allow : Suppose, » whence » may be found by perpendicular. And tang }p = tang 5A Bates 1+tang? $a — f_tan?3a ve tan22A ___ | tan d+tan? 4a + | tand+tan?3a_ tand (tan d+tan? 3a —tanbf_tan23a q 2+-&e. | tan b-+tan® $A tan b-+tan?$ tan 6+tan2 3a tan b+tan2 32 | tand+ tan 6+ tan b+tan? 3a tand+tan23a tan 6+... tan ...J then is: tang b tang $1» = N—N?+ N®— N*4+ N5— 4 — ... py. becomes, therefore, negative when > 90, and is = 0 when 6 ="90°. Walbeck, who proposed computing for the time of obser- vation, reduced for the estimated longitude from the first meri- dian, the apparent distance as seen from the place of obser- vation; and to derive, by a comparison of this computed distance with the observed one by means of the moon’s ap- parent horary motion, the error of the estimated longitude, has remarked already the necessity of computing the refraction for the points of contact when the altitudes are low, in the note to page 15 of his Dissertatio de Modo reducendi Distan- tias, Abo 1817: “ Si rigorose calculaveris, refractio non pro Centro lunz sed puncto limbi quo distantia capitur sumenda est. Inutile vero est, calculum talibus minutiis molestum red- dere, que preterea, nisi sit luna vel sol horizonti proximus nullius sunt momenti. Ex hac etiam caussa minimee altitu- dines evitari debent.” But low altitudes are better than none, and cannot always be avoided. Walbeck found from latitude, declination and horary angle, the altitudes, parallactic angle and the corrections of the alti- tudes, and thence the apparent declinations and right ascen- 382 Mr. Rumker’s new Method of sions of both bodies, and computed thence, with true dif- ference of right ascensions and true declinations, the true di- stance, and withthe apparent difference of right ascensions and apparent declinations, the apparent distance, and the differences A‘— A of these apparent and true distances for three successive equally distant periods ¢,, ¢,, ¢3, and denoted by «5 w2, wa, the remainders left by a subtraction of these differences A‘— A from one another. Suppose now w, = A + Bt, + Cz#,’, a, = A+Bé, +Ct,’, and a, = A+Bz#,+Cz,?, then is, © w, (t3—ty) + &(t;—ts) + 3 (ta—t)) (t.—7,) (t3—t,) (tg—ta) Parra t,—t, C= p= C(¢,+7¢,) and A = w, —¢,(B+#, CQ), whence any other # = A + Bt+C# for any given ¢ may be found, provided A is assumed proportional to the given 2; Then w+ sum of apparent semidiameters applied to the distance taken from the Naut. Almanac for the time reduced for longi- tude to the first meridian, gives the apparent distance of limbs, which by a comparison with the observed distance will show the error of the assumed longitude. This rather laborious proceeding may be simplified by taking also from the Nauti- cal Almanac for the same reduced time, together with the other elements, the true distance of the centres, and finding by differ. R cosin declin. sine distance the sun, as well as for the moon; then a subtraction of the parallactic angles from the angles of position will give the above-mentioned angles S and M, whence will be found, A’—A = (a'—¢') cos M—(g— =) cos S+ third correction, where S and M are considered acute; any doubts whether the angles of position are obtuse or acute, are easily decided, and the reduction of the refraction to the points of contact is ac- complished in the same manner as before. This method offers advantages when by a series of observations the longitude of a place on shore is to be determined. At sea it would be unwise to neglect the opportunity of observing the altitudes above the visible horizon, considering that the latitude enter- ing into the calculation of the altitudes rests upon no firmer base than the contemporaneously observed altitudes, and re- quires moreover a very unsafe reduction by dead-reckoning to the time and place of lunar observation, not to mention , the sines of the angles of position for reducing Lunar Observations. 383 that the error of the estimated longitude affects the elements entering into the computed altitudes taken from the Nautical Ephemeris, of which the observed altitudes are independent. Immediately before or after new moons the faint image of the moon when she is high may be difficult to bring down to the horizon, and occupy such a position in respect of it, that neither upper nor lower limb can be correctly observed. The computed altitude of a fixed star is also more to be depended on than its observed one; in these cases it is better to com- pute, particularly the high altitudes, with the reduced geo- centric latitude, as the refraction corresponds thereto, which, by rights, ought to have been taken from the tables for the angle of the ray of light with the normal or with its comple- ment; the altitude above the sensible horizon then requires only a trifling correction. When the lower object is a star, and the moon’s altitude is not too small, the usual methods are sufficiently correct, pro- vided allowance is made for barometer and thermometer. Here follows a specimen of the table of the contraction of the vertical diameter on account of the refraction, which is calculated for the mean diameter of the sun, and for mean re- fraction. Correction for Correction for Correction for Altitude. Tower Limb. | 4°50"! — 4 45 40 35 Lower | Upper i c Upper Limb. | Limb. i Limb. fe} =r = OW Ph or cooceccos 9 9 9 , 9 9 8 8 8 8 8 8 BOO NIA ARAAaNNS mm Ro i — i — i — i — i — i — WCwOWWWAEL EE RE PR v NNN c & or —i——) or [ 384 ] LXX. Observations on the Lines of the Solar Spectrum, and on those produced by the Earth's Atmosphere, and by the Action of Nitrous Acid Gas. By Sir Davin Brewster, K.H., V.P.R.S. Ed.* [NX a paper on the Monochromatic lamp, &c., read before the Royal Society of Edinburgh on the 15th April 1822, and published in their Transactions, I recorded some of my earliest experiments on the action of coloured media on the solar spectrum. ‘These experiments were continued at irre- gular intervals, with the view of obtaining distinguishing cha- racters of coloured media, of investigating the cause of the colours of natural bodies, and of examining more correctly the phzenomena of the overlapping colours of equal refrangi- bility, which I had announced in the paper already referred to. The results to which I was conducted on the two last of these subjects have been already published, in two papers, one on the analysis of solar light, and the other on the colours of natural bodies. The first and the principal object of my inquiries, namely, the discovery of a general principle of chemical analysis, in which simple and compound bodies might be characterized by their action on definite parts of the spectrum, still re- mained to be pursued. ‘The coloured juices of plants—arti- ficial salts and their solutions, and various glasses and mi- nerals—had afforded me many beautiful examples of this species of action; and after determining the locality of these actions in reference to Fraunhofer’s principal lines, and their intensity, as depending on the thickness of the absorbing me- dium and the brightness of the spectrum, I was able to di- stinguish all such compounds, by merely looking through them at a well-formed spectrum. Even in those cases where the eye could recognise no difference between the colours of two substances that exercised different specific actions upon light, their discrimination was instantly effected by viewing them through a standard coloured medium. As some of these bodies attacked the spectrum at fwo, three, four, and even five or more points at once, it became probable that the number and intensity of such actions de- pended on the number and nature of the elements which en- tered into the composition of the body, or, what is nearly the same thing, that it was the sum of all the separate actions of such elements; and hence the next step in the inquiry was, to determine the action of elementary bodies on the solar spectrum. ‘This inquiry was not limited to coloured bodies, * From the Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, corrected. Sir David Brewster on the Lines of the Solar Spectrum. 385 for it is quite possible that a body may transmit light perfectly white, and yet exercise a definite action in absorbing various parts of the spectrum. The only physical condition which is necessary in this case is, that the sum of all the rays thus absorbed, shall constitute white light. The first substances which I examined were sulphur and iodine vapour. The sulphur attacked the violet end of the spectrum with great force, and, when combined with arsenic, in the form of native orpiment, its absorptive power for the same colours was greatly increased. Even with the thinnest film that I could detach, and not exceeding the two-hundredth part of an inch, the spectrum was, as it were, cut sharply in two near the boundary of the green and indigo spaces, and this body possessed the very uncommon property of having nearly the same colour at small as at great thicknesses. By increasing the thickness, the absorption advances almost im- perceptibly from the remaining blue border, and if the trans- parency continued, the transmitted light would certainly be- come red at great thicknesses,—a property which may be communicated transiently to the thinnest plates, merely by an increase of temperature. The iodine vapour acted powerfully upon the middle of the spectrum, and, by an increase of thickness, gradually extended its absorption towards both extremities; but more rapidly to- wards the violet one, so as to show that the final colour must be a homogeneous red*. In so far as these two experiments went, they were highly favourable to the speculation which had at first presented it- selfto me. My attention was now directed to the action of gaseous bodies, and the first trial which I made was with nitrous acid gast. The result of this experiment completely destroyed the hypothesis which had appeared so plausible, and presented me with a phenomenon so extraordinary in its aspect,—bearing so strongly on the rival theories of light,— extending so widely the resources of the practical optician, and lying so close to the root of atomical science, that I am persuaded it will open up a field of research, which will ex- haust the labours of philosophers for centuries to come. The spectrum of Newton, and of all the philosophers of the 18th century, was a parallelogram of light, with circular ends, in which the seven colours gradually shaded into each other without any interruption. The illumination was a maxi- mum in the yellow rays, and the light decayed by insensible * [See Lond. and Edinb. Phil. Mag., vol. ii. p. 362. ] + [See Lond. and Edinb. Phil. Mag., vol. ii. p. 381 By Third Series. Vol. 8. No. 48. May 1836. 2 hh $86 Sir David Brewster on the Lines of the Solar Spectrum, degrees towards the red and the violet extremities. In the year 1808, Dr. Wollaston conceived the happy idea of examin- ing a beam of light, that passed through an aperture only the twentieth of an inch wide, and he was surprised to see it crossed by seven dark lines, perpendicular to its length. About ten or twelve years afterwards, the celebrated op- tician Joseph Fraunhofer, without knowing what had been done by Dr. Wollaston, observed the spectrum formed by the sun’s light transmitted through small apertures; and by ap- plying a telescope behind the prism, he discovered about 600 parallel dark lines traversing the spectrum. As no such lines appeared in the spectra of white flames, Fraunhofer considered them as having their origin in the nature of the light of the sun. The strongest of these lines were seen in the spectra of the Moon, Mars, and Venus, and, by means of very fine in- struments, he was able to detect one or two of them with other new lines in the spectra of Sirius and Castor. Such was the state of the subject, when I made the experi- ment already referred to on nitrous acid gas. Upon examin- ing with a fine prism of rock-salt, with the largest possible refracting angle, (nearly 78°,) the light of a lamp transmitted through a small thickness of the gas, whose colour was a very pale straw yellow, I was surprised to observe the spectrum crossed with hundreds of lines or bands, far more distinct than those of the solar spectrum. The lines were sharpest and darkest in the violet and blue spaces, fainter in the green, and extremely faint in the yellow and red spaces. Upon in- creasing, however, the thickness of the gas, the lines grew more and more distinct in the yellow and red spaces, and be- came broader in the blue and violet, a general absorption ad- vancing from the violet extremity, while a specific absorption was advancing on each side of the fixed lines in the spectrum. It was not easy to obtain a sufficient thickness of gas to de- velop the lines at the red extremity, but I found that heat produced the same absorptive power as increase of thickness, and, by bringing a tube containing a thickness of half an inch of gas to a high temperature, I was able to render every line and band in the red rays distinctly visible. The power of heat alone to render a gas, which is almost colourless, as red as blood without decomposing it, is in it- self a most singular result; and my surprise was greatly in- creased when I afterwards succeeded in rendering the same pale nitrous acid gas so absolutely black by heat, that not a ray of the brightest summer’s sun was capable of penetrating it. In making this experiment, the tubes frequently exploded, but, by using a mask of mica, and thick gloves, and placing the and on those produced by the Earth's Atmosphere, §c. 3857 tubes in cylinders of tinned iron with narrow slits to admit the light, there is little danger of any serious accident. When the gas is in the liquid state, it produces none of the fixed lines which I have described, and exercises no other action upon the spectrum than any ordinary fluid of the same orange colour. In examining the structure of the solar spectrum, Fraunho- fer seems to have put forth all his strength in determining the position of the principal lines, A, B, C, D, E, 6, I’, G and H*, which he had selected as equidistant as possible, for the purpose of measuring their angular distances in different media, and thus obtaining the most accurate data for the con- struction of the achromatic telescope. ‘These measures he has given with the greatest exactness for various kinds of crown and flint glass and for a few fluids, and be has thus put it into the power of the practical optician to construct achro- matic object-glasses, with a degree of certainty and perfection hitherto unknown. This method, however, notwithstanding its high value, is not easily applicable in practice, and from the nice observa- tions which it involves, we have reason to believe that it has not been used by any other artist than Fraunhofer himself. The difficulty of procuring out of the mass of glass to be em- ployed, prisms sufficiently pure to show such narrow lines as E, or the two which constitute D+,—of obtaining the sun when his light is wanted, and of observing and measuring the distances of the fixed lines ina spectrum constantly in motion, are insurmountable obstacles to the general adoption of so refined a method of measuring dispersive powers. From all these difficulties, the discovery of lines in the ni- trous acid gas spectrum completely relieves us. As the lines whose distances are required, may be made as broad and black as we please, prisms of ordinary purity are suflicient to exhibit them in perfect distinctness. The artificial light of a lamp can be commanded at any hour, and as its rays are ab- solutely fixed, the least experienced observer can have no dif- ficulty in measuring the distances of the fixed lines, and thus obtaining, with extreme accuracy, all the data for the con- struction of achromatic instruments. But it is not merely to this practical purpose that the gaseous lines are singularly applicable. Among the various solids and fluids in nature, there are very few sufficiently pure and transparent, to enable us to see through them the lines of * Six of these, viz. B, D, 6, F, G, and H, were discovered by Dr. Wollaston. + These lines are also the most important, as the most luminous part of the spectrum lies between them. 2R-2 388 Sir David Brewster on the Lines of the Solar Spectrum, the solar spectrum, so as to enable us to measure their refrac- tive and dispersive powers with minute accuracy, whereas the gaseous lines can be rendered visible, however imperfectly the spectrum may be formed. In determining the various ele- ments of double refraction and polarization, and in all optical researches where the phenomena vary with the refrangibility of the rays, the gaseous lines will hereafter perform a most important part. Had the solar lines been much broader than they are, we might have been able, by means of minute thermometers, to have ascertained the temperature of all those parts of the spectrum where there was no light, and thus to have deter- mined whether or not the rays s of light and heat are separate and independent emanations. The ‘phenomena of the nitrous acid gas spectrum, the lines of which can be widened at plea- sure, “enable us to perform this and other interesting experi- ments, and thus to decide many important questions in the theory of radiant matter. From the various experiments which I had made on the ae sorptive action of coloured media, I was led to a general prin- ciple, which, in that stage of the inquiry, appeared to possess considerable importance. The points of maximum absorption exhibited a distinct coincidence with some of the principal dark lines in the solar spectrum, and thus indicated that these lines marked, as it were, weak points of the spectrum, on which the elements of material bodies, whether they existed in the solar atmosphere or in coloured solids and fluids, ex- ercised a particular influence. ‘These actions, however, were so indefinite, that, with the exception of the oxalate of chro- mium and potash*, a salt of most remarkable properties, they never appeared in the form of lines or distinct bands. ‘The light which was left shaded into the dark spaces, and there- fore) notwithstanding the general coincidence which I had observed, the phenomena of ordinary absorption could not be identified with those of the definite actions by which the solar lines are produced. i This point of similarity, however, led me to institute a di- ligent comparison between the solar lines and those of the nitrous acid gas spectrum; and it did not require many ex- periments to prove, that there existed between these two classes of phanomena a most remarkable coincidence. — In order to afford ocular demonstration of this fact, I formed the solar and the gaseous spectrum with light passing through the same aperture, so that the lines in the one stood opposite * [See Lond. and Edinb. Phil. Mag.,, vol. ii. p. 362 ; and vol. vii. p. 436.] and on those produced by the Earth's Atmosphere, §c. 389 those on the other, like the divisions in the vernier and the limb of a circle, and their coincidence or uon-coincidence became a matter of simple observation. I then superimposed the two spectra, when they were both formed by solar light, and thus exhibited at once the two series of lines, with all their coincidences, and all their apparent deviations from it. Professor Airy, to whom J showed this experiment, remarked, that he saw the one set of lines through the other, which is an accurate description of a phenomenon, perhaps one of the most splendid in physical optics, whether we consider it as appealing to the eye or to the judgement. The general coincidence, thus cognisable by the eye, re- quires to be more particularly explained. Though some of the larger lines in the gaseous spectrum coincide with some of the larger ones in the solar spectrum, yet, In many cases, faint and narrow lines in the one coincided with strong and broad lines in the other; and there were some strong gaseous lines, and even broad hands, to which I could discover no counterpart in I’raunhofer’s map of the spectrum, which, at this stage of my inquiry, was the standard to which I appealed. This discrepancy at first embarrassed me, and, as I observed it in parts of the spectrum where Fraunhofer had laid down every line which he had seen with his finest instruments, I abandoned all hopes of being able to establish the general principle of their identity. 1 was therefore obliged either to renounce this principle as one contradicted, or rather not con- firmed by observation, or to consider Fraunhofer’s delinea- tion as in fault, and to enter upon the Herculean task of making a better map of the spectrum. The magnificence of Fraunhofer’s instruments,—the means of nice observation which he had at his command,—and his great skill as an observer, were considerations which long de- terred me from even attempting to repeat his examination of the spectrum. Possessing such inferior means, and situated in so unfavourable a climate, I should have felt the attempt as presumptuous; but in the comparison which I had already made of the gaseous and solar lines, I had detected grave errors, and inexplicable omissions, in Fraunhofer’s map, and was disposed even to adopt the suggestion of Mr. H. F. Tal- bot, (to whom I mentioned the fact, and who had the same confidence that f had in Fraunhofer’s accuracy,) that a change might have taken place in the light of the sun itself, and that the delineation of the Bavarian philosopher might have been perfecily accurate at the time when it was executed. This supposition, however, became less and less tenable as I pro- ceeded in the identification of the two classes of lines; but 390 Sir David Brewster on the Lines of the Solar Spectrum, . even if it had been otherwise, it would have added a still more powerful motive, while it afforded the best apology for under- taking a new delineation of the spectrum. The apparatus which I had at my command for this inves- tigation were two very fine rock-salt prisms, executed by my- self; a large hollow prism made of plates of parallel glass for holding fluids; a fine plate glass prism, by Fraunhofer, and which I owe to the kindness of Mr. Talbot; a copious supply of oil of cassia and oil of cinnamon, which Mr. George Swin- ton transmitted to me from Bengal with his usual liberality ; a good achromatic telescope, by Berge; and an excellent wire micrometer by Troughton. ‘To this apparatus Mr. Robison made two important additions, which he executed with his own hands, the one a brass stand with a variable aperture for admitting the incident light, and the other a stage for holding and‘ adjusting the prisms in front of the object glass; and I have recently been favoured by Sir James South with the use of his fine, five-feet achromatic telescope, executed by Dollond. After a little practice in the observation of the solar spec- trum, I discovered most of the lines, which I had in vain sought for, in Fraunhofer’s map, as the counterpart of those in the gaseous spectrum. I saw well-marked groups, of which he had only given one of the lines, and shaded bands, and well-defined lines, which his methods of observation had not permitted him to discover. After I had laid down all the principal features in the spectrum, I was able to examine the two classes of lines pari passu. ‘The action of the gas upon invisible lines in the spectrum rendered them visible by slightly enlarging them, and this enlargement of a ‘solar line indi- cated the existence of a corresponding line in the gaseous spectrum. By this double process, and by methods of observation which I believe have never before been used in optical re- searches, I have been able to execute three different maps of the spectrum; first, a map of the lines in the solar spectrum; secondly, a map of the same spectrum, exhibiting at the same time the action of nitrous acid gas upon solar light, previously deprived of a number of its definite rays; and, thirdly, a map showing the action of the gas upon a continuous and uninter- rupted spectrum of artificial white light. The general scale of these delineations is, four times greater than that of Fraun- hofer, but some portions of them are drawn on a scale ¢welve times greater, which became necessary from the impossibility of representing in narrower limits the numerous lines and bands which I have discovered. The length of Fraunhofer’s -and on those produced by the Earth’s Atmosphere, Sc. 391 spectrum is 15}inches. Mine, upon the same scale, is nearly 17 inches. The length of the general spectrum, which I have delineated, is about five feet 8 inches, and the length of a spectrum, corresponding to the scale on which I have deline- ated parts of it, is seventeen feet. Fraunhofer has laid down in his map 354 lines, but in the delineations which I have executed, the spectrum is divided into more than 2000 visible and easily recognised portions, separated from each other by lines more or less marked, ac- cording as we use the simple solar spectrum, or the solar and gaseous spectrum combined, or the gaseous spectrum itself, in which any breadth can be given to the dark spaces. The suggestion of Mr. Talbot induced me to watch nar- rowly the state of the defective solar lines at different seasons of the year, in order to observe if any change took place in the combustion by which the sun’s light is generated, or in the solar atmosphere through which it must pass. Such changes I have found to be very general in every species of terrestrial flame. The definite yellow rays which exist in almost all white lights, flicker with a variable lustre; and analogous rays in the green and blue spaces proceeding from the bottom of the flame, exhibit the same inconstancy of illumination. In the course of the winter observations, I observed distinct lines and bands in the red and green spaces, which at other times wholly disappeared; but a diligent comparison of these ob- servations soon showed, that these lines and bands depended on the proximity of the sun to the horizon, and were produced by the absorptive action of the earth’s atmosphere. I have no hesitation, therefore, in affirming, that during the period of my own observations, no change has taken place either in the dark lines or luminous bands of the solar spectrum; a result which seems to indicate, that the apparent body of the sun is not a flame in the ordinary sense of the word, but a solid body raised by intense heat to a state of bril- liant incandescence. ) The atmospheric lines, as they may be called, or those lines and bands which are absorbed. by the elements of our atmo- sphere, have their distinctness a maximum, when the sun sinks beneath the horizon. ‘The study of them, consequently, becomes exceedingly difficult in a climate where this luminary, even in a serene day, almost always sets in clouds; but as I have availed myself of every favourable moment for observa- tion, | have been able to execute a tolerably accurate delinea- tion of the atmospheric spectrum. It is a curious circumstance, that the atmosphere acts very powerfully round the line D, and on the space immediately on 392 Sir David Brewster on the Lines of the Solar Spectrum. the least refrangible side of it. It develops a beautiful Jine in the middle of the double line D, and by enlarging a group of small lines on the red side of D, it creates a band almost as dark as the triple line D itself. It widens generally all the lines, but especially the darkest one which I call m between Cand D._ It develops a band on‘the least refrangible side of m, and it acts especially upon several lines, and develops a se- parate band on the most refrangible side of C. The lines A, B, and C are greatly widened, and lines and bands are parti- cularly developed between A and B, and generally through- out all the red space. Most of the lines thus widened by the atmosphere are faint lines previously existing in the spectrum, and I have no doubt that they would be seen in the spectrum of the lime ball light condensed by a polyzonal lens, and acted upon by thirty miles of atmosphere. . The absorptive action of the atmosphere shows itself in a less precise manner in the production of dark bands, whose limits are not distinctly defined. A very remarkable narrow one, corresponding to one produced by the nitrous acid gas, is situated on the most refrangible side of C. Another very broad one lies on the most refrangible side of D, close to a sharp and broad band of yellow light, displayed by the general absorption of the corresponding part of the superimposed blue spectrum. There is also an imperfectly defined atmospheric action, corresponding to a group of lines where Dr. Wollas- ton placed his line C. This general description of the atmospheric lines, while it indicates the remarkable fact, that the same absorptive ele- ments which exist in nitrous acid gas exist also in the atmo- spheres of the sun and of the earth, leads us to anticipate very interesting results from the examination of the spectra of the planets. Fraunhofer had observed in the spectra of Venus and Mars, some of the principal lines of the solar spectrum. This, indeed, is a necessary consequence of their being illu- minated by the sun, for no change which the light of that luminary can undergo, is capable of replacing the rays which it has lost. But while we must find in the spectra of the pla- nets and their satellites, all the defective lines in the solar spectrum, we may confidently look for others arising from the double transit of the sun’s light through the atmospheres which surround them. Allerly, April 12, 1833. F989 5. LXXI. ‘On the Theory of Vanishing Fractions, in reply to the Observations of Professor Young. By W.S. B. Woot- HOUSE.* [|X my short but comprehensive essay on the principles of * the differential and integral calculus, printed in the Ap- pendix to the Gentleman’s Diary for the years 1835-36, my expressed object was to remove, as far as was practicable, the perplexing difficulties usually experienced by those students who very naturally desire to bring the subject under the gui- dance and dominion of their reasoning faculties. The theory of vanishing fractions is well known to be the chief source of these difficulties ; and it so happens, unfortunately for begin- ners, that writers have hitherto paid little or no attention to the strict interpretation that ought to be given, in the general sense, to a fraction when the values of its numerator and de- nominator have both absolutely disappeared or become equal to zero. This part of the subject has been diligently exa- mined in the second part of my essay, where it is shown that a fraction in such a state may consistently possess any value whatever, if it be not limited by a special condition, but that one particular value only will fulfill the law of continuity assumed by the successive values immediately before or after the disappearances take place. It appears, however, that my explanations, there given, are insufficient to satisfy the scruples of Prof. Young, who has, in opposition to the principle I have adopted, entered into a very general statement of his own views at page 295 of the last Number of the Philosophical Magazine. The opinions of one so deservedly eminent as my esteemed friend are entitled to high consideration, and 1 am duly sen- sible of the respectful and condescending manner in which his observations are expressed. In a mathematical discussion of this kind, however, it would have been more desirable had Prof. Young attached less weight to his supposed evidence of authority, and applied himself more closely to the demonstra- tion of his statements, nearly all of which are at direct variance with my judgement, and therefore, to me, far from being satis- factory. I here propose a brief and explicit examination of the most important points that Professor Young has advanced, and, I hope, with the same earnest anxiety for the spread of scientific truth that he has been pleased to ascribe to me. To any person unacquainted with the inquiry, Professor Young’s assertions would seem to imply that my views were of a strange and revolutionary description; that they were, in re- * Communicated by the Author, Third Series. Vol. 8. No. 48. May 1836. 2 S 394 Mr. Woolhouse on the Theory of Vanishing Fractions, ality, adverse to the results of our ablest modern analysts, and directly opposed to well-established truths ;—indeed it would almost appear that Professor Young himself had contracted that notion. No idea, however, could be imagined more contrary to the fact. The new line of theory, adopted and pursued in my essay, leads to precisely the conclusions subscribed to by all modern analytical writers, and varies only in the substitu- tion of strict reasoning in place of the illogical and mysterious mode of deduction that has all along rendered this most im- portant branch of mathematics a popular paradox. Profes- sor Young has quoted two of my most general principles, which, with one or two more extracts, will convey a pretty correct idea of the particular view I have taken of the subject. As these extracts will very much facilitate the present discus- sion I shall here annex them. I. As a principle, we have no right to reduce a fraction by dividing its numerator and denominator by absolute nothing, as the process removes from the fractions the indeterminate character which they previously possessed, and which they ought to retain. (Gentleman’s Diary, Appendix, page 26.) IT. If, in the investigation of a geometrical problem, the unknown quan- tity is expressed by a fraction which in a particular case becomes a vanishing one, the problem in that case will resolve itself into a po- rism, and the value of the fraction, or unkuown quantity, will then admit of arbitrary assumption; and a similar result will follow in all such cases, whatever be the nature of the investigation. (Page 25.) IIf. Whenever, in an analytical investigation, the resulting expression for a quantity resolves itself into a vanishing fraction, we may observe, as a general rule, that either one of the original conditions of the in- quiry becomes destroyed, or that two or more of them become depen- dent, and, consequently, whichever way it be, that there is at least one condition less to fulfill, and that the vanishing fraction is not, restricted to any determinate value. (Pages 26, 27.) : IV. When a fraction, which in a particular case becomes a vanishing one, expresses the value of a quantity which we previously know, from the nature of the subject, does not become discontinuous in that case, or generally when such a fraction enters in any equation, the other terms of which are not discontinuous, the fraction is, under such cir- cumstances, necessarily limited to continuous values, and consequently, when the terms vanish, it must take the particular value, (described in the essay,) or the ordinary result deduced either by the method of limits or the usual process of differentiation. (Page 29.) The paragraphs IT. and III., which embody the main -prin- ciple, are those extracted by Professor Young, who labours under a misapprehension if he supposes that I contented my- self with testing their accuracy by two particular examples. Has Professor Young read the remark on page 26 that im~ mediately follows my examples? Speaking of the examples, I there add, that “* these are not adduced as curious instances, but merely as examples of what always takes place in such in reply to the Observations of Professor Young. 395 cases.” It is here evident that 1 had not contented myself with testing the accuracy of the propositions by the two par- ticular examples. On the contrary, my conviction of their truth was founded on the solid evidence of mental demonstra- tion, and the examples were adduced for the purpose of illus- tration without any reference to the proof of the principle itself, which, in common with the others, may be established without much difficulty. I shall now proceed at once to the demonstration of these principles. First, then, it is required to be shown that, logically, we have no right to reduce a fraction by dividing its numerator and denominator by absolute nothing. Let ¢2, $x be two functions of a variable 2 which do not vanish when «=a; and suppose another variable y to be so connected with x as to always fulfill the condition (vx—a) Ox—y (2 — al > @ = 0. (1) in which 2, 8, are two positive numerical indices and either whole or fractional. The value of y deduced from this con- dition is (v7 —a) Ou (x—a)* ox and takes the most general form of a vanishing fraction. Sup- pose it to be reduced by dividing the numerator and deno- minator by (2 — a)’, and it becomes te = a) Pe Se PP ed ore = ae RON (a — a) Sectoebie (3) Let x now be taken equal to a and the expression (2) will become y = 2, while (3) will give Oo a > ic} we 2 if \- = Bo (4) in a< fp But if we refer back to the original condition (1), it is plain that it will be satisfied with 2 = a, independently of the value of y, that in this case it imposes no limit whatever on the value of y which is therefore completely indeterminate. It follows therefore that the result of (2), when x = a, viz. y = 8, must have the same indeterminate acceptation ; and that the pro- cess of dividing the numerator and denominator of (2) by (2 — a)’, (= zero when 2 = a,) which produces (3), and so determines a particular value for y, is inadmissible when 2=a, and ought not in that case to be performed. And as the ex- 282 y= eu Mss. (2) 396 Mr. Woolhouse on the Theory of Vanishing Fractions, pression (2) comprehends every possible case of vanishin fractions, the reasoning is general, and fully establishes the position occupied in the first extract. 4 It is here evident that the same objection will apply to the division by zero of an equation involving two variables, or that the equation resulting from a division by a common factor is inadmissible when that factor absolutely vanishes. Thus the equation (1), when divided by (2 — a)F, gives (x —a)* "02—you =0, which would, for « = a, give to y the particular value in (3), a circumstance quite inconsistent with the nature of the con- dition involved in the antecedent equation (1), which, in the case x = a, places no restriction on the value of y. It is also obvious that the multiplication of an equation, or of the nu- merator and denominator of a fraction, by zero, is equally ob- jectionable, as regards propriety of reasoning, since, by that process, we might pass from conditions that determine par-. ticular values to others of a totally indeterminate character. Before quitting this. point it will be well to draw a general and necessary inference that may, in conjunction with the fourth extract, contribute in some degree towards the eluci- dation of the present inquiry. It is this: —That when a quan- tity, which we know from other considerations ought to have a determinate value, comes out in a vanishing fraction, or, vice versa, when a quantity, which we know to be indetermi- nate, comes out in a determinate form, we may be assured: that at least one of the steps, in the process of solution, fails in the manner here explained. : The proof of the principles contained in the other extracts immediately follows from the preceding demonstration. Sup- pose the equation (2) to express the result of an analytical investigation in which the reasoning throughout is admissible when x = a, so that no multiplication or division by a power of x —a occurs in the process. We proceed to show that the resulting vanishing fraction (2), when x =a, must be in- determinate in value. The equation (1), which is antecedent to, and corresponds in signification with, the equation (2), is satisfied with 2 = a, without any reference to the value of y, be- cause that equation is divisible by a positive power of « —a. Since, therefore, in the investigation, no multiplications or divi- sions have been made by 2 —a or any power of it, it is conclu- sive that the series of equations, which precede the equation (1) in the course of reduction, must likewise be divisible by the same power of z — a, and therefore be satisfied with x = a, inde- pendently of the value of y. The primitive equation from in reply to the Observations of Professor Young. 397 which the expression (2) is deduced will consequently, when x = a, be also satisfied by any value of y._ If this primitive equation expresses an original condition of the problem, that condition, therefore, when x = a, cannot limit the variable y, or the expression (2), to any particular value. If, however, this equation is produced by a combination of two or more leading equations of the problem, the circumstance of its wholly disappearing when x = a, will necessarily lead us to the conclusion that for this particular value of 2 some depen- dency exists among those leading equations, and therefore that one of the original conditions of the problem becomes, in that case, virtually destroyed. In addition to this proof we may remark that the expression (3) is legitimately deduced from the equation (1) in every case in which x — a does not ab- solutely vanish, or in which the value of x differs from the quantity a, however small that difference may be; that since it holds good when z is taken as nearly equal toa as we please, and is in itself continuous as 2 approaches and arrives at that value, it is evident that, when x becomes exactly equal to a, it will express, as in (4), that particular value of y, or of the vanishing fraction (2), which unites in the law of continuity observed by all its other successive values. Having attempted, and I expect successfully, the demonstra- tion of the principles laid down in the extracts from my essay, without discovering them to be “ fallacious,” it now remains for Professor Young, since the truth is our common object, either to subscribe to my views or to point out wherein consists the inac- curacy of the reasoning here employed; and, without any wish, to prolong our discussion, I unhesitatingly pledge myselt to de- vote my most respectful and candid consideration to whatever arguments or explanations he may be pleased to offer. But it will be useless to pursue the subject any further unless Pro- fessor Young will enter more into the theoretical merits of the question and make up his mind to support every general statement with some kind of evidence. In Professor Young’s present letter he thinks it remarkable that I did not reflect that was as likely to be “ the symbol of absurdity” as the symbol of multiple values, and he follows up the same idea by observing that “* when we are operating with equations of the first degree, containing several unknown quan- tities, the symbol ® is, in fact, the very form which the result usually takes when the proposed equations involve incompatible conditions.” If, however, subjects of absurdity are not to be ab- surdly treated, I apprehend it will not require any extraordinary degree of reflection to be convinced of the incorrectness of such 398 Mr. Woolhouse on the Theory of Vanishing Fractions, anotion. On the other hand, it is rather remarkable that Professor Young did not consider that 3 was the usual symbol of absurdity or of incompatible conditions, and that § could never be so, in the result of an investigation logically con- ducted. Thus, the corresponding antecedent equation to the Oo adie hs result x =o, when cleared of fractions, is oz =0 or 0 =0, an equation that is very obviously satisfied without any limi- tation to the value of z, and that cannot fail therefore to be compatible with other equations or conditions; but the cor- responding antecedent equation to the result «= 2 is: =m. an equation evidently indicating the presence of absurdity or of incompatible conditions, unless the nature of the inyestiga- tion will admit of infinite results. The query respecting the geometrical series is dismissed at once by a reference to the fourth extract from my essay. By putting for S the series it represents, the equation is 9 n—1 a (r” — 1) atar+ar-+.....+t ar o> Sree and as the left-hand member is not discontinuous when 7 = 1, the vanishing fraction, which forms the right-hand member, must be limited to its continuous value, viz. 2a. The very circumstance of the equation involving both a determinate and an indeterminate quantity, when r =1, indicates the ex- istence of a fallacy in the process by which it has been de- duced. We first have SS a ar a7? foes 27 pec0sn(G) and multiplying by r — 1, we get (ry —1) S=ar*—a =a (r®— 1) seveee (8) which divided by 7 — 1, gives S = oe aa eoeeeesessce (c) In the case 7 = 1, and ry — 1= 09, we have therefore com- mitted the fault of multiplying by absolute nought in passing from (a) to (6); but the equation (c) is a true deduction from (b), for the mere placing of r— 1 in the denominator of a. fraction is not an actual performance of division. The equa- tion (a) becomes S =a +a +a + «3 the equation (4) entirely vanishes, and (c) becomes S = = After the foregoing discussion it will be needless to offer any special observations on the obvious inaccuracy of Professor ' in reply to the Observations of Professor Young. 399 Young’s views of the ellipse question. It may, however, be worth while to take the opportunity of adding a single remark on an erroneous principle which he appears to entertain regarding the general theory of analytical results. I never before heard of theincompetency of an analytical result to afford any positive in- formation that an investigation could admit of. It is plain that the original equations, which express the analytical conditions of a problem, cannot include any extraneous conditions with those expressed in the enunciation, and that they must there- fore comprehend, in their analytical results, every solution that the problem is capable of receiving. The equations, how- ever, may not include certain other implied conditions, de- pendent on the peculiar nature of the inquiry, and therefore may yield some additional solutions incompatible with the conditions so implied. For instance the nature of a problem may be such as to exclude from the results not only imaginary values but negative values and values which fall beyond cer- tain limits, though they will be unavoidably comprehended in the analytical solution. ‘The exclusion of inadmissible solu- tions, therefore, rests with the nature of the problem and not with the forms of its analytical conditions. It is hence evident that Professor Young involves himself ina palpable incon- sistency, when he arrives at the fact of the ellipse question admitting multiple solutions, by an examination of the origi- nal analytical conditions, and at the same time alleges that the analytical result is quite incompetent to supply that informa- tion; for the true analytical result must necessarily present every solution capable of satisfying the analytical conditions from which it has been deduced. If we refer back to the na- ture of the problem, as originally presented, which is the pro- per source of rejective information, we perceive that the only condition it imposes on the results is the limitation which re- quires the coordinates xy to fall within the bounds of the ellipse, or of the circle that represents it in the indeterminate case. I have thus unreservedly enumerated the principal reasons on which I found my sincere and firm conviction of the incor- rectness of the various statements contained in Professor Young’s letter. To avoid the possibility of being misunder- stood, I have also given a concise analysis of the most impor- tant of the principles maintained in my essay ; and, in conclu- sion, I may be permitted to add, that instead of their being *condemnatory of conclusions which, in the works of our ablest modern analysts, wear all the aspect of mathematical certainty,” they establish the truth of those very conclusions on a firmer and more intelligible basis,—that instead of. the 400 Mr. E. Solly’s father Experiments on Electric Conduction. mere aspect of certainty, in favour of those conclusions, they substitute certainty itself. London, April 9, 1836. a LXXII. Further Experiments on Conducting Power for Elec- tricity.* By Evwarp So.ty, Jun., Esq. 15. [* my former communication I said that I had found iodine when solid to be a nonconductor, but I did not describe any experiments made with it in the melted state, This perhaps may have appeared an omission, the more so after Dr. Inglis’s note (the contents of which had not, however, been communicated to me,) had been appended to my paper; but I had been advised to lose no time in describing such of my ex- periments as were in opposition to Dr. Inglis’s statement that “jodine is a conductor”.+ What follows now will explain that apparent omission. 16. In all my original experiments I had found iodine to be a nonconductor in the fluid as well as the solid state; but on the present occasion, when I was led to repeat them by the above- mentioned statement, I was not a little surprised to find the iodine, when rendered fluid by heat, become a conductor. ‘That a substance acting as iodine does should not be similar as to conducting power when fluid to what it is when solid, (as all known substances that have been as yet examined are, excepting only such as are electrolytes, and also perhaps the periodide of mercury,) but should appear a conductor upon assuming the liquid state, was so singular, and so contrary to my previous results and preconceived views, that I was in- duced to multiply my experiments; they continued unsatis- factory, and they were the more so as the iodine did not always appear a conductor but sometimes a nonconductor, and then, when it did appear a conductor it did ina very feeble manner, and with great uncertainty. 17. Iwas therefore led to doubt the purity of the iodine which I was using, and this seemed the more probable as it was from a different source from that which I had employed in the original experiments; and in the means which I had be- fore described for examining conducting power it was impos- sible the wires could touch, and therefore the objection which the use of loose wires would have introduced was avoided. In consequence I procured some perfectly pure iodine sublimed at a very low temperature, and ascertained that that which I had * Communicated by the Author: see our Number for February, p. 130. + Lond. and Edin. Phil, Mag., No, 43. p. 129. Mx. E. Solly’s further Experiments on Electricity. 40% ‘ been previously using contained some impurity, most probably the iodide of iron, which is not unfrequently present in the iodine of the shops. The pure substance which I now used proved equally a nonconductor when fused as it had proved to be when solid. 18. When iodine is distilled with five times its weight of chlorate of potassa, a liquid comes over, which, according to Wohler, is a chloride of iodine: it proved to be a very good conductor. Its solution in xther was also a good conductor, zther being as is well known a non-conductor. The chloride which I used. was purified by being twice distilled off chloride! of calcium. After the electric cur- rent had passed, upon examining the tube which had con- tained the chloride of iodine, I found that the one platinum wire, or that which had been the anode, was very much cor- roded, but still quite clean; the other, or that which had been the cathode, was encrusted with black matter very like iodine in appearance. So good a conductor indeed was this fluid, that the spark of a voltaic battery was hardly visibly impaired by interposing a small portion of it in the circuit. Great heat was evolved during the passage of the current, so that the li- quid soon boiled. 19. The chloride of bromine and its solutions in water and ether were all good conductors. 20..1 prepared iodic acid by Connel’s process and then heated it up to its boiling point. I kept it fused and boiling for about a minute, and then allowed it to cool; by this means more than half was decomposed and volatilized, but what re- mained was I believe pure iodic acid. I used it immediately after this to prevent absorption of moisture from the atmo- sphere. I then found it a most distinct insulator when solid, but a very good conductor when fused, so much so that a spark might be easily taken from its melted surface. Its aqueous solution was also a very good conductor, and when strong, iodine was precipitated at the cathode. 21. It isvery interesting and curious that iodicacid should be- have thus, for as in all hitherto described experiments oxygen and iodine were both found to go to the same electrode, and as in order to the decomposition of a body the two composing ions must go to opposite electrodes*, it seems very unlikely that iodic acid should be an electrolyte: besides this, it is not com- posed of one proportional of each of its elements, which Mr, Faraday has shown to be the case with all known electrolytest. * Experimental Researches in Electricity, by Mr. Faraday, No. 828,— [Lond. and Edinb. Phil. Mag., vol. y. p. 425.—Eb1r.] + Ibid. No. 679.—[vol. v. p. 167.] Third Series. Vol. 8. No.48. May 1836. ie 402 Reviews, and Notices respecting New Books. If, however, it be an electrolyte, which is very improba- ble, it will be a proof that in the electrolyzation of a sub- stance the evolution of the one ion depends entirely on the nature of the other ion with which it is combined; and thus the terms anions and cations will only be relative. If, how- ever, iodic acid is not electrolyzed, still this experiment fur- nishes us with another exception to the law of liquido-con- duction * similar to the periodide of mercuryt+. 22. Unfortunately, however, iodic acid is decomposed b the same degree of heat which is required to melt it, and the vapours of iodine entirely prevent the acid being examined during the experiment: it is also decomposed by almost all substances which can be used as electrodes, and therefore the advantage which can sometimes be taken of observing which of the electrodes is corroded, is here of no avail. I was there- fore quite unable to ascertain whether iodic acid was electro- lyzed or not; but when the electrodes were immersed in the fused acid, much stronger ebullition seemed to take place than before. 23. It was impossible to ascertain whether the oxides of bromine and chlorine were conductors or not, and I therefore had not the advantage of comparing iodic acid with the bro- mic and chloric acids. I had at first some hopes of being able to add further ex- periments in relation to these last described, but finding that not in my power, I no longer delay sending the above. 7, Curzon Steeet, 15th April, 1836. LXXIII. Reviews, and Notices respecting New Books, On the Theory and Solution of Algebraic Equations ; with the Recent Researches of Budan, Fourier, and Sturm on the Separation of the Real from the Imaginary Roots of Equations: by J. R. Youna, Pro- fessor of Mathematics in Belfast College. Souter, London. We have more than once dwelt upon the remarkable perspicuity ; of Mr. Young’s writings. In this respect they are, one and all, models of the very best kind for the elementary writer, and far better adapted than any which we are acquainted with, for the purposes of actual study. In saying this, we mean no ordinary praise ; for of all kinds of writing on science, and especially on mathematical science, the development of elementary principles in a perspicuous and logical manner is the most difficult. If Mr. Young had succeeded only in this, beyond any other author in our language, he would have achieved much, and have effected sufficient towards a diffusion, not only of * Exp.Res. in Electricity, by Mr. Faraday, No.402.—[Lond. and Edinb Phil. Mag., vol. iii.] ¢ Ibid. No. 691.—[vol. v. p. 169.] Prof. Young on Algebraic Equations. 403 mathematical knowledge, but of taste for mathematical pursuits in the younger branches of the community, to claim the gratitude of every sincere friend of science and of man. How many have turned away in disgust from the illogical statements (for arguments they deserve not to be called, nor, scarcely, even sophisms,) of the general mass of writers on analysis, under the impression, justly entertained so far as any impression could result from such works, that it was com- posed of a mere set of hocus pocus triflings ! or in despair of ever ac- quiring even a glimpse of the promised land that lay beyond the ele- mental mountain-range, darkened as it was by the symbolical mists in which ignorant or injudicious compilers had involved them! Not on by easy steps, generalizing the particulars, one after another, in a way that not only commands our assent, but interests the attention too deeply to allow of our being turned aside from the further pursuit of science. His algebraical reasonings are not less convincing than those of the Euclidian logic; and the hold which the elegant formule and elegant results he derives take upon the fancy, is not less strong than that which his compact and unsophisticated reasoning takes upon the understanding. So much may be said of all Professor Young’s writings: but his present work, in addition to this, has many and pe- culiar claims upon the attention of the mathematical world, as well as upon the young and aspiring class of mathematical students. From the time that our distinguished countryman Harriot trans- posed the “ absolute term” to the same side of the equation with the other terms, algebra has taken a new aspect,—a totally new cha- racter. He wasthus enabled to show that an equation of the nth degree may be compounded, from n simple equations having n roots, which may be any numbers whatever ; and he inferred (not so illogi- cally as has been ofter represented by foreign historians of algebra*, and too implicitly admitted by our own,) that every equation of the mth degree has also n roots. From that time the great problem of algebra became the determination of those roots by a practicable pro- cess. Certain cases of it had been already solved, so far as the fourth degree inclusive, by more than one person ; the simple and the quadra- tic equation at a very early period, the cubic by Tartaglia and Cardan, and the biquadratic by Ferrari. All these were solved by exhibiting a general formula in terms of the 2nd and 3rd roots of certain as- signed functions of the coefficients ; and the ambition of the earlier inquirers was to find analogous expressions for the roots of the fifth and higher degrees. The inquiry undet this form has been altogether unsuccessful ; and the most signal mistakes, and, in many cases, the most ludicrous ones, have been made in the progress of such attempts. * A lithographic specimen of a manuscript page of Harriot’s work, pub- lished by that eminent mathematical antiquary Professor Rigaud of Oxford, in his Supplement to the works of Dr. Bradley, sets this question quite at rest. He distinctly understood the nature both of negative and imaginary roots. The“ Ars Praxis Analytic,” we would add, is rather to be taken as a specimen of Warner's power to comprehend Harriot s views, than as a standard of those views themselves. 2T?2 404 Reviews, and Notices respecting New Books. The problem, on the authority of very careful researches into the re- lation that must subsist amongst the roots themselves in the com- position of the coefficients, and the degree of the subsidiary equations to which the algebraical expression of those relations conducts us, is now known tobe incapable of solution by a general formula. If this be established satisfactorily (and to our own minds it is so), the in- quiry is ended in this direction; and the only ground to hope for a so- lution is in the discovery of some process which shall evolve the several roots by one continuous series of operations, figure after figure, till either the whole of them areassigned ; or, when the roots are irrational, till so many figures shall be assigned as are necessary for the purpose had in view in the problem in which the equation originated *. This was the method followed by Newton, whose sagacity led him to see the hopelessness of a general formula of solution, if not its essential im- possibility,—one instance amongst many of his extraordinary pre- science of the history of science in after ages, Nor was this done after a casual view of the subject, but after careful investigations ofits charac- ter, as is evident from the researches which he made respecting the re- lations between the roots and the coefficients of a literal equation—re- searches, to the results of which, much as they have been since pur- sued, the labours of his successors have made comparatively unimpor- tant additions. His method of approximation, however, with which we are now more immediately concerned, was characteristic of his great mind, and remained till our own time, except under peculiar circum- stances, not only the briefest, but the best that had been proposed. Still it had its difficulties and imperfections, even after the initial figure of a root had been found, and these were fully exposed by Lagrange in the 5th note to his Traité de Resolution des Equations as far back as 1798; and though they have been in some degree removed by Mr. Horner (in the Annals of Philosophy,) and Baron Fourier (in his Analyse des Equations Determinées,) the method is on many accounts incumbered with difficulties that are of a serious practical nature, and essentially inherent in the principle of the process. A method of approximation, very elegant in theory, and though not rapid in execution, yet free from some of the defectsincident to New- ton’s method, was given by the celebrated analyst just referred to, Lagrange, by which the root was exhibited in a continued fraction. This, too, besides its practical tediousness, had other inconveniences, several of which, by the labours of Mr. Horner, published in the An- nals of Philosophy and the Journal of the Royal Institution, were al- most entirely removed. Still the tediousness which is essential to its first principle of operation is such as to render it useless in practice, except where some very important object arises to justify the employ- ment of the great length of time which its practice requires. It is to Mr. Horner that we owe a simple, rapid, easy, and complete method of continuous approximation, disencumbered of all extraneous * The investigation is here referred to cases in which the equation is re- duced toa rational form, as indeed are all the general conclusions which are deduced respecting equations. A valuable dissertation on irrational or surd equations is given by Mr, Horner in the present volume of this Journal, p. 43. Prof. Young on Algebraic Equations. © 405 operations and symbols, and arranged in a form so condensed as ra- ther to resemble, in appearance, the extraction of the square or cube root of a numerical quantity, than the solution of a complete equa- tion, but considerably less complicated than even that operation as it is generally laid down. All the work is visible to the eye, and is arranged in a series of columns beneath the coefficients*: and these, step by step, formed by the multiplication of the result in one column by a single digit, and added to the next throughout the series, till the new subtrahend is found beneath the absolute term. By a repetition of the same process, a new trial divisor is found and verified, and the coefficient of a new equation, having its roots reduced by the quan- tity brought out already, has its coefficients standing in the same columns, instead of the original coefficients at the head. A continuance of this simple process evolves the root, figure after figure, till the whole of them if rational, or as many as are requisite if irrational, are de- termined. The process, moreover, instead of becoming more com- plicated, and the determination of the next figures more uncertain, becomes more simplified in the first respect, and more certain in the other; and the last half of the whole number of figures (save one) are obtained by mere division. Moreover, it presents at the end of the pro- cess, the coefficients of a new equation, which contains the remaining roots of the original equation. It thus, whilst the root is actually as- signed, presents us with the depressed equation simultaneously pro- duced,—an additional advantage of the method. Nor are these all; but our space does not allow of our entering into further particulars. This substitution of a general method for a general formula is not, indeed, the object after which the lovers of mere symbols have been straining ; and perhaps such formule, though in their employment, a hundred times the work would be required, would be more accordant to such prejudices: nevertheless, the mathematician who looks at the question with a philosophic eye, will see, that as this process is requisite even in the extraction of the roots which any such formule must involve, the search after those formule is a matter of mere tri- fling. Though it strains at the naked gnat, it can swallow the sym- bolized camel,—the more smoothly, the more incumbered it is with these useless and unintelligible hieroglyphics! By the mathematician who values a result, less by its extreme algebraical complication than by the elegant facility of its application to the main purposes for which the formule were devised, a method like this must be hailed as one cf the greatest boons that has ever been conferred upon the scientific community. Its influence will soon be felt in every department of philosophy which involves considerations respecting mensurable quan- tity, by whatever means the measures can be effected; and in many cases even theories will be brought to a decisive test, the numerical results upon which this testing depended having been hitherto in- volved in equations which no ardour or perseverance could resolve by any of the methods heretofore proposed. Though this discovery was published in the Philosophical Transac- * No letters are introduced, and the whole process is purely numerical, 406 Reviews, and Notices respecting New Books. tions in 1819, and was immediately pirated by others, yet it has un- accountably been neglected amongst mathematicians in general, in England. For this we cannot, nor do we pretend to account ; but it is unfortunate, less for Mr. Horner’s sake than for the sake of mathe- matical science. We hope, however, that the elegant exhibition of the principles and the processes of the method which are given in this work by Professor Young (together with Mr. Horner’s own illustra- tions of the subject in Leybourn’s Mathematical Repository, vol. v.,) will have the effect of familiarizing at least the younger and more in- quiring English mathematicians with this beautiful system of numeri- cal solution. No work could be better calculated to produce such an effect, and we doubt whether any (even a minor) improvement can be made upon it as it stands in this work, and in Mr. Horner's papers. Even amongst those who have felt disposed to do justice to Mr. Horner’s labours, there are few, it appears to us, who are fully aware of the extent of the applicability of his theorems. He has, indeed, only applied them in one particular direction ; and it is, perhaps, too much to expect that others will be hasty in making applications of them which he has not suggested. The unaccountable neglect with which his past labours have been received, may well discourage the most ardent and persevering mind. We sincerely trust, however, that he has yet many years of activity and usefulness before him, and that he may still be able to accomplish some of the purposes, to which his previous investigations directly lead. As in the extraction of the square and cube roots, so in this gene- ral evolution of the roots of an equation, the first figure is to be found tentatively ; and as in them, so here, the successive figures are determined with greater certainty at every successive step. The divi- sional portion also of neither one nor other commences till after the first step: or in other words, the initial figure of the root and its sign are required as a separate and preparatory step to the operation of the method. The difficulty of effecting this first step has always been found to be great. Lagrange proposed a method which, though theo- ertically perfect, was yet, from the immense labour which it involved, utterly incapable of application to practice, except, indeed, in cases in which the necessity for its application was partially superseded by other methods, namely, in the equations of the first four degrees *. It was reserved for Budan to overcome this difficulty in his Nowyelle Méthode, published in 1803, with the high approbation of Lagrange himself, Most unaccountably, this valuable work lay neglected in France till after Navier’s publication of Fourier’s Anal. des Eq. Det. in 1831, and in England till it was made known to the readers of our Magazine and of Leybourn’s Repository by Mr. Horner. It was soon perceived * Common justice requires that the laborious researches of the Abbé de Gua (Meém. de l’ Acad., 1741) should not be overlooked in any history of this problem. Though only in a very limited degree successful, he yet opened the road of inquiry, and deduced several very important results, In his expression for the nwmber of conditions necessary to render all or any number of the roots of an equation real, he is certainly wrong; but this is not the place to discuss the source of his error, or to give the true formula. Prof. Young on Algebraic Equations. 407 by the Continental mathematicians that Fourier’s was but a slight mo- dification of Budan’s method, and accordingly the French elementary writers since that time have invariably given the name of Budan, not that of Fourier, to the method. The few English mathematicians who have spoken on the subject, following Navier and Fourier, or rather Mr. Peacock’s account of the matter, have designated them as ‘‘ Fou- rier’s rules.” Professor Young ascribes them rightly to Budan ; and we hope that, as his work must of necessity obtain an extensive circulation, the mistake will be gradually corrected. We hope it is not too late, though we well know how difficult it is to eradicate a familiar epithet, however unjust ; as, for instance, in the case of “ Cardan’s Rule” for cubics, and “ Mercator’s Projection” of the Sphere, neither of which, it is well known, was the invention of the persons whose names they bear, whilst the names of their authors, Tartaglia and Wright, are almost unknown, except to well-read mathematicians. This rule was an immense advance in the progress of actual solution, as it enables us to discover the number of roots which lie between any assigned limits, a and b, and to determine whether they be real or imaginary. The initial (or, if need be, any number of figures,) of the real roots may be successively determined ; and hence the methods of actual ap- proximation, whether that of Newton, of Lagrange, or of Horner, may be immediately commenced, and the determination of it gradually and systematically effected*. This method, however, though in com- parison of Lagrange’s “ Equation of the Squares of the Differences of the Roots” such as to induce any one to rejoice in its discovery, and value it as perfect, still a simpler, more direct, and effective me- thod has been since discovered by M. Sturm, already alluded to. It was read to the French Institute in 1829, before the publication of Fourier’s Traité, but was not published in its Mémoires till a few months ago. It was, however, printed in Crelle’s Journal fiir die reine und angewandte Mathematik, about a year after, and was introduced in an abridged form into the works of Lacroix, Bourdon, and Lefebre de Fourcy, soon and successively. No allusion to it, however, appeared in any English work till the publication of Profes- sor Young's treatise. It is the more extraordinary that Mr. Pea- cock should have overlooked it when writing his “ Report”, as it was so easy of access from so many quarters, The memoir has since been accurately and elegantly translated into English, as we noticed in a late Number, by Mr. W. H. Spiller. The best and most simple of all the abstracts of this important paper that we have seen is that of Mr. Young, in the work before us. Mr. Horner has well termed it the « gem of the book,”—well, as modestly coming from him ; but still, to our thinking, not more a gem than the version of his own methods in the same work : and to follow the metaphor, we would add that it is here cut, polished, and set in the most tasteful and elegant manner of which it seems capable. Even to accomplished mathematicians, to whom the subject is new, we strongly recommend the reading of Mr. Young’s chapter before taking up the original memoir, as it will * Fourier employs the Newtonian, though he has put it in almost the worst form, perhaps, of which it is susceptible for actual working. 408 Reviews, and Notices respecting New Books. greatly facilitate the study of Sturm’s details to have Young’s general view of its essential parts already in the mind: to younger and less experienced students this course is indispensable, whilst to those who are but arrived at the threshold of the subject, by their previous ac- quirements, no inducement to pursue the obvious and natural course is necessary. The process itself is, we may add, in application, only the method of finding the greatest common measure of two alge- braical expressions. The real roots, both positive and negative, being successively evolved, an equation is left in which all the roots are imaginary. For all the purposes of actual calculation, the problem then is perfectly solved. Still, for many reasons, it is desirable to be able to assign the quad- ratic factors of which the depressed equation is composed. Is it too much to hope that another Horner or another Sturm may rise up in our own day to render the solution, in every sense, complete ? The process of Sturm is the same as that which leads, in the usual operation itself, to the detection of the equation which is composed of equal roots, and terminates there at once, so that we cannot but detect them as we proceed. This is a great advantage, in as much as we can- not pass over this circumstance unknowingly. We have, it is true, to depress the equation, and proceed anew ; but we have removed all am- biguity as to equal roots, and done very much towards their determi- nation. This advantage is peculiar to the method of Sturm. If real roots, in the reduced equation, lie between narrow limits, we know they are not equal ones, and therefore proceed to their separation with certainty. We would not, however, conceal from our readers the fact that, advantageous as Sturm’s rule generally is, in comparison with that of Fourier and Budan, still the great facility with which the derived polynomes are formed in the latter method, compared with the tedious calculations which the former often requires, is a great and decided advantage in this stage of the work. Wherever, from the want of some visible relation amongst the coefficients of the given equation existing, it is probable that the derivation of Sturm’s V,, V,, etc. (or X,, X,, etc. of Young’s notation) will give high numbers as coefficients of these derived polynomes, we think it better to defer the application of either method, till, by successive substitutions in the usual manner, it is rendered evident that some test will be required, by the appear- ance of “a doubtful interval.” Should there be but one such doubt- ful interval, or even a small number of them, compared with the de- gree of the equation, then we think Fourier’s method will be the less operose: but if several, then unquestionably it will be most simple to have recourse to Sturm’s in preference to the other. The direct- ness of Sturm’s process, and the less danger of interchanging the ad- ditive and subtractive signs of the result, is an advantage, however, which furnishes great relief to the attention during the operation, and which, to calculators who are not in the almost daily use of either the one or the other, will be duly valued as an important feature of this process. It may, moreover, often be abbreviated in practice by using only a few of the higher places of figures, instead of all Prof. Young on Algebraic Equations. 409 which result from finding the coefficients of the derived polynomes ; as the ratios alone are sought, and these can hardly ever be required to extreme exactness, since the general character, not the particular values, are generally sought. Atthe same time some experience, and the foresight which experience alone can give, is requisite to distin- guish when, and under what circumstances, this abbreviation can be used with perfect safety. If we take, for instance, the biquadratic equation 32 2* + 41 2° — 184 2* — 24x + ] = 0, the application of Sturm’s method brings us to products (and in these cases logarithms cannot be used with perfect safety, except where the contractions can be used) of szrteen figures; and as the coefficients of equations which arise out of any inquiry to which algebra may be made subservient, and under all conditions of the data, are generally less likely to be so simple as the example given above, some subsidiary methods of less- ening the actual trouble are yet not only desirable, but necessary. Cannot Mr. Horner so apply or modify his principle of “ Synthetic Division”’, as to furnish a more direct and easy algorithm for Sturm’s Rule? We think we see more than one way by which this may be accomplished ; but we leave it in better hands, when we refer over the problem into his*. The space which we can devote to a review will not allow us to give even a general analysis of Professor Young’s treatise. It is suf= ficient to say that it contains all that can be interesting to the student on the subject of equations, developed with his usual perspicuity and elegance ; and that it is brought, in all essential points, to the state of Science at the present hour ; and though principally intended for the use of students who have only mastered the first principles of algebra, and happily adapted to their wants, yet as a syllabus for recalling to the minds of the most extensively read mathematicians on the subjects of equations, the essentials of what they already know, we are per- suaded that it will be of considerable utility. With this conviction we take our leave of the work, happy if our favourable notice shall be the means of rendering it more extensively known, and that less for the sake of Professor Young than of the numerous persons who may derive advantage from his labours. * We have often wondered that the method of working with the “ de- tached coefficients” in algebraic multiplication and division has never been introduced into practice, and even into elementary works: and that the beautiful contrivance of what its inventor has called “ Synthetic Division” (see Leybourn’s Repos., vol. v.,) has not also become a school-boy practice ere now. This is also one amongst the many valuable improvements in algebra and arithmetic conferred on mathematicians by Mr. Horner. The eleventh edition of Hutton’s course, edited by Dr. Gregory, is the only e/e- mentary work in which it has yet appeared, 410 Reviews, and Notices respecting New Books. Herretotocia Mexicana, seu Descriptio Amphibiorum Nove Hispa- nie, que itineribus Comitis de Sack, Ferdinandi Deppe et Chr, Guil. Schiede in Museum Zoologicum Berolinense pervenerunt. Pars I. Saurorum Species amplectens, adjecto Systematis Saurorum Pro- dromo, additisque multis in hunc Amphibiorum ordinem observatio- nibus, edidit Dr. Arend Friedericus Augustus Wiegmann. Accedunt tabule lithographice decem, novorum generum typos exhibentes. Berolini sumptibus C. G, Liideritz, 1834. London, W. Wood, Tavistock-street. This Work is intended to form two volumes, of which the first con- tains the order Sauri, and the second will contain the Ophidii, Chelonii, and Batrachii. The author treats of the Sauri, on which he has founded the Prodromus of his system, at large, giving careful charac- teristic definitions of all known genera, appending the Crocodiles (Loricati, Merr.) and the Amphisbenoides, as he has done in a former work (Handbuch der Zoologie, Berlin 1832), as aberrant suborders. The anatomical characters of the typical subdivision (Squamati) and of both the aberrant (Loricati and Annulati) are investigated at length. The typical subdivision (Squamati) is divided into the series Lepto- glossi, Rhiptoglossi,and Pachyglossi,which are developed in a Synopsis. The central group is formed by the Chameleontes alone ; the Leptoglosst and Pachyglossi form the lateral divisions, and are subdivided into two sections. LEPTOGLOSSI. RuIPTOGLOSSI. PacnyYGLosslI. Sect. I. (aberrans.) Sect.II. (typica.) Sect. I. Sect.I. (typica.) Sect. II. (aberrans. ) (a.) Brevilingues. (b.) Fissilingues. Vermilingues. (b.) Crassilingues. (a.) Latilingues. (Agame.) Fam. Fam, Fam. ‘am, am. 1. Lacertz. 1. Monitores. Chamzleontes. 1. Dendrobate. Ascalabote. 2. Stychopleuri. 2. Trachydermi. 2, Humivage. 3. Chamzsauri, 8. Ameive. 4. Scinci. 5. Gymnophthalmi. The families of the aberrant sections inhabit both hemispheres, those belonging to the typical only one, or the tribes belonging to the Old and New World show at least a great difference in their den- tition. The families are well characterized according to the pecu- liarities of their outward form and their osteological peculiarities. The author has added several observations to the genera, and has described a great number of new genera and species from all parts of the world. He refers, in describing the four last families of the Brevilin- gues, to a Synopsis of the genera, In the description of the Sauri of Mexico, which begins at p. 22, all the living genera are described with great accuracy, and he has often given a complete view of the anatomy of the typical species, also a Conspectus of all the species of the genus, with short diagnoses and descriptions of the Mexican species. The author has also endeavoured to show their relation to those from other parts of the world. The coloured plates surpass those of Wagler in accuracy, and give not only a true copy of the scaly covering of the animal, but so represent their habit and phy- siognomy, that they appear to be drawn after living specimens. Reviews, and Notices respecting New Books. 411 Frora Merropouitana; or Botanical Rambles within Thirty Miles of London. Being the results of numerous Excursions madein 1833, 1834, 1835, furnishing a List of those Plants that have been found on the different Heaths, Woods, Commons, Hills, &c., surrounding the Metropolis (more particularly in the Counties of Surrey and Kent,) chiefly from actual Observation and the latest Authorities. Intended for the Student in practical Botany: with a List of the Land and Fresh-water Shells of the Environs of London. By Daniel Cooper, London: S. Highley, 32, Fleet street. After a long, wet, and dismal winter, in the dirt and smoke and noise of the City, there is something inspiring in the title of this little work,— “ Botanic Rambles within Thirty Miles of London.” At sight of it the sky seems at length to brighten, the air becomes mild, and our ima- gination carries us to many a delightful spot as we glance over the habitats which Mr. Cooper has recorded. Nor will the botanist of the provinces smile at his brethren in the Capital when they exult in the opportunities which are afforded them for their favourite pursuit, if he considers the beauty and variety of the country within a cir- cuit of thirty miles of London, and the innumerable means of con- veyance ready at every moment of leisure or fine weather to trans- port them to the scene of their investigations. Of this district also, how considerable is the portion in which Nature has maintained her un- disturbed sovereignty in spite of inclosure-acts, corn-laws, and those artificial prices which have too often brought the crooked ploughshare to violate tracts that mock at cultivation ; but which, when unappro- priated and unperverted, used to yield spontaneously a rich feast to our nobler appetites! The lover of heath and thicket and forest, down and marsh and wood, gliding stream, and shady lane, may certainly go further and fare worse ; nor will the pedestrian gene- rally meet with more comfortable and reasonable entertainment than the inns within this circuit afford. To all these advantages we may now add that London possesses admirable schools for re- gular botanical instruction, since that important step in our social progress, the foundation of the University of London, and the con- sequent establishment of King’s College: here the labours of such eminent botanists as Professors Lindley and Don cannot fail to be attended with extensive usefulness, not to mention other meri- torious teachers connected with our medical schools. Highly valu- able, however, as such aids unquestionably are, Botany, as Pro- fessor Martyn has well observed, “ is not to be learned in the closet; you must go forth into the garden or the fields, and there become fa- miliar with Nature herself,—with that beauty, order, regularity, and inexhaustible variety which is to be found in the structure of vegeta- bles, and that wonderful fitness to its end which we perceive in every work of creation.” It has also been justly said by another writer, that “ the plants which adorn and characterize a picturesque country, impressed on the recollection by that attention which the botanist is led to bestow on them while enjoying his rambles, contribute largely to the stock of delightful associations which he carries away with him, 412 Proceedings of Learned Societies. and often call up the remembrance of the scenes in which he observed them. And in the intervals of rest, or of unfavourable weather, he may furnish himself with agreeable occupation in examining such as are new to him.”—Flora Vectiana, Pref. As the season has we trust arrived when we may exclaim, in the words of the Royal Botanist, Lo, the winter is past, The rain is over and gone. The flowers appear on the earth, The time of the singing of birds is come: we shall gladly recommend this little volume to those who are dis- posed to connect the study of nature with the purest enjoyment. Both what it contains and what it lacks may give them pleasing occupation, especially if they will endeavour to supply Mr. Cooper with contributions for a new edition. And if they would add to their pleasure by giving some attention to a kindred pursuit, we shall re- commend to them another companion in their excursions : namely, The Entomologist’s Useful Compendium; or an Introduction to the Knowledge of British Insects ; comprising the best Means of obtain- ing, preserving, studying, and arranging them; with a Calendar of their times of appearance, &c., illustrated with Plates: Part I. Longman and Co. The publication has been seasonably commenced in monthly parts, each part containing, in addition to a portion of the work, a Calendar of the times of appearance of insects for the ensuing month, the places where they may usually be found, and directions for collecting them, which will afford great assistance to the student. The merits of the work are well known from the former edition, which was soon exhausted ; and Mr. Samouelle has been long en- gaged in improving it, and adapting it to the advanced state of natural history. LXXIV. Proceedings of Learned Societies. ROYAL SOCIETY. [Continued from p. 156.] Dec. Jy lap following papers were read : “Memoranda taken 1835. during the continuance of the Aurora Borealis of November 18, 1835.” By Charles C, Christie, Esq. Communi- cated by Samuel Hunter Christie, Esq., F.R.S. The appearances described were seen from Deal, on the day men- tioned in the title, from 9 to 20 minutes past 10 o’clock in the even- ing ; and consisted chiefly of a bright arch of light, of which the lower edge was sharply defined, surmounted on a dark cloud below, while the upper edge was shaded off into the cloudless and starlight sky, emitting large but faint luminous streaks, which issued up- Royal Society. 413 wards with great rapidity, exactly imitating flames agitated to and fro by a violent wind.* ««Démonstration compléte du Théoréme dit de Fermat: par Fran¢ois Paulet, de Genéve, ancien éléve de l’E’cole Polytechnique.” Communicated by P. M. Roget, M.D., Sec. R.S. The theorem of which the author professes to give, in this paper, the complete demonstration, is the following: ‘No power, beyond the second degree, of any quantity, can exist, capable of being re~ solved into the sum, or the difference, of two other powers of the same degree :” or, as it may still more generally be expressed, “ If the exponents of three powers be multiplied by the same number, provided that number be greater than 2, neither the sum, nor the difference, of any two of the resulting quantities can ever be equal to the third quantity.” Dec. 17.—“ Researches towards establishing a theory of the Dispersion of Light, No. II.’ By the Rev. Baden Powell, M.A., F.R.S., Savilian Professor of Geometry in the University of Oxford. The author, in a preceding paper, published in the last part of the Philosophical Transactionst, commenced a comparison between the results of M. Cauchy's system of undulations, expressing the theoretical refractive index for each of the standard rays of the spectrum, and the corresponding index found from observation in different media. Since that paper was communicated, he has re- ceived the account of a new series of results obtained by M. Rud- berg, and comprising the indices for the standard rays in a prism of calcareous spar, and in a prism of quartz, both for the ordinary and the extraordinary rays; and also the ratios of the velocities in the direction of the three axes of elasticity, respectively, in Arragonite and Topaz. The author was accordingly led to examine this valu- able series of data, and the comparison of them with the theory forms the subject of the present paper. He finds the coincidences of theory and observation to be at least as close as those already obtained from Fraunhofer’s results, and to afford a satisfactory extension of the theory to ten new cases, in addition to those already discussed ; and a further confirmation of the law assigned by the hypothesis of un- dulations. A paper was in part read, entitled, “‘ On the action of Light upon Plants, and of Plants upon the Atmosphere.”” By Charles Daubeny, M.D., F.R.S., Professor of Chemistry and of Botany in the Univer- sity of Oxford. Jan. 7, 1836.—A paper was read, entitled, «‘ Meteorological Jour- nal kept at the Royal Observatory, Cape of Good Hope, from the 1st of June to the 3lst of December, 1834.” Communicated by Capt. Beaufort, R.N., F.R.S., Hydrographer to the Admiralty. * Other particulars respecting this Aurora have been given in our late Numbers: by Mr. Sturgeon, p. 134; Dr. Robinson, p. 236; and Prof. Rigaud, p- 850.—Ebpir. + An abstract of Prof. Powell’s preceding memoir will be found in Lond. and Edinb. Phil. Mag., vol. vi. p. 374: various papers on the subject, by-Prof. Powelland Mr. Tovey, have appeared in our last and present volumes.—Eprr. 414 Royal Society. The observations recorded in this Journal are those of the baro. meter, and of two thermometers, one in, and the other out of doors; taken at sunrise, noon, sunset, and midnight, in each successive day from the Ist of June, 1834, to the end of the year. «« Some Account of the Volcanic Eruption of Coseguina in the Bay of Fonseca, commonly called the Coast of Conchagua, on the Western Coast of Central America.” By Alexander Caldcleugh, Esq., F.R.S. The particulars recorded in this narrative are derived partly from a voluminous collection of official reports transmitted from the au- thorities in various towns to the government of Central America, _ and partly from the information of intelligent eye-witnesses of the phenomena. The eruption occurred on the 19th of January, 1835, and was preceded by a slight noise, accompanied with a column of smoke issuing from the mountain, and increasing till it took the form of alarge and dense cloud, which, when viewed from a distance of ten leagues to the southward, appeared like an immense plume of white feathers, rising with considerable velocity and expanding in every direction. Its colour was, at first, of the most brilliant white; but it gradually became tinged with grey; then passed into yellow; and finally assumed a beautiful crimson hue. In the course of the fol- lowing days several shocks of an earthquake were felt, the last of which were most terrific. On the morning of the 22nd, the sun had risen in brightness; but a line of intense darkness denoted the pre- sence of the same cloud which had before presented such remarkable appearances, and which, extending with great rapidity, soon ob- scured the light of day ; so that in the course of half an hour the darkness equalled in intensity that of the most clouded night: per- sons touched without seeing one another ; ‘the cattle hurried back to their folds ; and the fowls went to roost, as on the approach of night. This atmospheric darkness continued with scarcely any di- minution for three days; during the whole of which time there fell a fine impalpable dust, covering the ground at St. Antonio to the depth of two inches and a half, and consisting of three layers of different shades of grey colour: and for ten or twelve succeeding days the sky exhibited a dim and murky light. At Nacaome, to the northward of the volcano, the same degree of darkness was ex- perienced, and the deposit of ashes was from four 'to five inches in depth, and exhaled a fetid sulphureous odour, which penetrated through every interstice in the buildings. The complete obscurity was only occasionally broken by the lightning, which-flashed in every direction, while the air was rent with loud and reiterated explosions like the discharges of artillery, which accompanied each eruption of volcanic matter, and conspired to strike the deepest terror, and to spread among the inhabitants a universal panic that the day of judge- ment was arrived. On the 24th the atmosphere became clearer, and the houses were found covered to the depth of eight inches with ashes, in which many small birds were found suffocated. Deer and other wild animals flew to the town for refuge, and the banks of the neigh- bouring streams were strewed with dead fish. In Segovia, and as far as eight leagues from the volcano, the showers of black sand were Royal Society. 415 so abundant as to destroy thousands of cattle; and many were subsequently found whose bodies exhibited one mass of scorched flesh. Within the Bay of Fonseca, and two miles from the volcano, it is stated that two islands, from two to three hundred yards in diameter, were thrown up, probably from the deposit of masses of scoriz on previously existing shoals. Jan. 14.—Dr. Daubeny’s paper entitled, “ On the action of Light upon Plants, and of Plants upon the Atmosphere,” was resumed and concluded. The objects of the experimental inquiries of which the author gives an account in this paper were, in the first place, to ascertain the ex- tent of the influence of solar light in causing the leaves of plants to emit oxygen gas, and to decompose carbonic acid, when the plants were either immersed in water, or surrounded by atmospheric air. The plants subjected to the former mode of trial were Brassica oleracea, Salicornia herbacea, Fucus digitatus, Tussilago hybrida, Co- chlearia armorica, Mentha viridis, Rheum rhaponticum, Allium ur- sinum, and several species of Graminee. Geraniums were the only plants subjected to experiment while surrounded with atmospheric air. Comparative trials were made of the action on these plants of various kinds of coloured light, transmitted through tinted glass, of which the relative calorific, illuminating, and chemical powers had been previously ascertained ; and the results of all the experiments are recorded in tables; but no general conclusion is deduced from them by the author. He next describes a few experiments which he made on beans, with a view to ascertain the influence of light on the secretion of the green matter of the leaves, or rather to deter- mine whether the change of colour in the chromule is to be ascribed to this agent. The third object of his inquiries was the source of the irritability of the Mimosa pudica, from which it appeared that light of a certain intensity is necessary for the maintenance of the healthy functions of this plant, and that when subjected to the ac- tion of the less luminous rays, notwithstanding their chemical influ- ence, the plant lost its irritability quite as soon as when light was altogether excluded. He then examines the action of light in causing exhalation of moisture from the leaves; selecting Dahlias, Helian- thuses, Tree Mallows, &c., as the subjects of experiment. The general tendency of the results obtained in this series is to show that the exhalation is, ceteris paribus, most abundant in proportion to the intensity of the light received by the plant. He also made various comparative trials of the quantity of water absorbed, under dif- ferent circumstances, by the roots of plants, and chiefly of the He- lianthus annuus, Sagittaria sagittifolia, and the Vine. From the ge- neral tenor of the results of these and the preceding experiments, he isinclined to infer that both the exhalation and the absorption of moisture in plants, as far as they depend on the influence of light, are affected in the greatest degree by the most luminous rays ; that all the functions of the vegetable economy which are owing to the presence of this agent, follow, in this respect, the same law; and that in the vegetable, as well as in the animal kingdom, light acts in 416 Royal Society. the character of a specific stimulus. The author found that the most intense artificial light that he could obtain from incandescent lime produced no sensible effect on plants. The latter part of the paper is occupied by details of the experi- ments which the author made with a view to ascertain the action of plants upon the atmosphere, and more especially to determine the proportion that exists between the effects attributable to their action during the night and during the day; and also the proportion be- tween the carbonic acid absorbed, and the oxygen evolved. His experiments appear to show that at least 18 per cent. of oxy- gen may be added to the air confined in a jar by the influence of a plant contained within it. He also infers that the stage of vegetable life at which the function of purifying the air ceases, is that in which leaves cease to exist. The author shows that this function is per- formed both in dicotyledonous and in monocotyledonous plants, in evergreens as well as in those that are deciduous, in terrestrial and in aquatic plants, in the green parts of esculents as well as in ordinary leaves, in Alge and in Ferns as well as in Phanerogamous families. Professor Marcet has shown that it does not take place in Fungi*. The reading of a paper, entitled, ‘« On the Anatomical and Optical Structure of the Crystalline Lenses of Animals, being the continua- tion of the paper published in the Philosophical Transactions for 1833.” By Sir David Brewster, K.H., LL.D., F.R.S.,—was com- menced. Jan, 21.—Sir David Brewster’s paper, entitled, “On the Anato- mical and Optical Structure of the Crystalline Lenses of Animals, being the continuation of the paper published in the Philosophical Transactions for 1833,” + was resumed and concluded. The author has examined the structure of the crystalline lens of the eye of a great variety of animals belonging to each of the four classes of Vertebrata; and has communicated in this paper a de- tailed account of his observations, arranged according as they re- late to structures more and more complex. In a former paper, published in the Philosophical Transactions for 1833, the lens of the Cod fish was taken as the type of the simplest of these structures, in as muchas all the fibres of which it is composed converge, like the meridians of a globe, to two opposite points, or poles, of a spheroid or lenticular solid ; both of which poles are situated in the axis of vision. The structure which ranks next in respect of simplicity is that exhibited in the Salmon, among fishes; in the Gecko, among reptiles; and in the Hare, among Mammalia. It presents at each pole two septa placed in one continuous line, in different points of which all the fibres proceeding from the one surface to the other have their origin and termination. A structure somewhat more complex is met with in the lenses of most of the Mammalia, and is particularly exemplified in the lion, the tiger, the horse, and the ox. Three septa occur at each pole in the form of diverging lines inclined to * A notice of the results obtained by Prof. Marcet will he found at p. 82 of the present volume.—Enpir. + Sir D. Brewster’s former paper on this subject was given entire, with additions, in our Number for March last, p. 193.—Epir. Royal Society. 417 one another at angles of 120°. The next degree of complexity is presented in the lens of the whale, the seal, and the bear, which contain, instead of three, four septa on each side, placed at right angles to each other in the form of across. In some specimens of lenses of whales and seals the author observed two septa from each pole, forming one continuous line, from each of the extremities of which proceeded two others, which were at right angles relatively to one another: so that there were in all five on each surface. The most complex structure is that of the lens of the elephant, which exhibits three primary septa diverging at equal angles from the pole, and at their extremities bifurcating into two additional septa, which are inclined to each other at angles of 60°, these latter being the real septa, to which the fibrous radiations are principally related. In some lenses of the elephant the author found the three septa immediately proceeding from the poles exceedingly short, and ap- proaching to evanescence ; so that he has no doubt that occasion- ally they may be found to have disappeared, and that the other six septa will then all diverge from the poles, like the radii of a hexagon, at angles of 60°. In all the preceding cases, where the arrangement of the fibres is symmetrical on the two sides, the septa on the opposite surface of the lens occupy positions which are reversed with respect to one another ; thus in the simple case of the double septa at each pole, the line formed by those of the posterior surface is situated at right angles to that formed by the septa of the anterior surface. Where there are three divergent septa at each pole, the direction of those on the one side bisect the angles formed by those on the other side ; and again, where the septa form a rectangular cross, those of one surface are inclined 45° to those of the other surface. It follows as a consequence of this configuration of the series of points which constitute the origins and terminations of the fibres, that all the fibres, with the exception only of those proceeding in a direct line from the extremities of any of the septa, must, in their passage from the one surface to the other, follow a course more or less contorted ; and must form lines of double curvature; that is, curves of which none of the portions lie in the same plane. The fibres of the lenses of quadrupeds gradually diminish in size from the equator or margin of the lens, where they are largest, to their terminations in the anterior or posterior septa. They are united together by small teeth like those of fishes; but, generally speaking, the teeth are smaller and less distinctly pronounced, and sometimes they are not seen without great difficulty. In the lens of the turtle, as well as in that of several fishes, the arrangement of the fibres, instead of being symmetrical on the two sides, as is the case in all the preceding instances, is different on the anterior and posterior surfaces; there being two septa on the for- mer, but none in the latter, which presents only a single polar point of convergence. The author has directed much of his attention to the optical pro- perties of these structures. Thelens of the salmon depolarizes three Third Series. Vol.8. No. 48. May 1836. 2U 418 Royal Society. series of luminous sectors ; the inner and outer series being negative, and the intermediate series positive. The polarizing structure of the cornea is negative, and it depolarizes very high tints at its junc- tion with the sclerotic coat. When a slice cut from the sclerotica nearly perpendicularly to the surfaces, and with parallel faces, is exposed to polarized light, it exhibits the system of biaxal rectilineal fringes, exactly like those in a plate of glass heated by boiling wa- ter or oil, when in the act of rapid cooling. The same alternation of properties with regard to polarization in the successive strata of the substance of the crystalline lenses is exhibited by other fishes which the author examined. With respect to the final cause of these highly complicated ar- rangements, it is reasonable to conceive that the gradually increas- ing density of the fibres in each successive stratum from the surface to the centre is intended to correct spherical aberration : but the design of the other properties resulting from the arrangement of the fibres with reference to septa, in all their variations of number and position, and more especially the alternations of positive and nega- tive structures, as exhibited by the action of the different strata in polarized light, has not even excited the ingenuity of conjecture, and will probably remain among the numerous problems destined to exercise the sagacity of another age. Jan. 28.—A paper was read, entitled, “ Discussion of Tide Ob- servations made at Liverpool.” By J. W. Lubbock, Esq., F.R.S. The chief purpose which the author has in view in presenting the tables accompanying this paper, which are a continuation of those published in the Philosophical Transactions for 1835, and are founded on the observations instituted by Mr. Hutchinson at Liver- pool, is to exhibit the diurnal inequality in the height of high water, which is.scarcely sensible in the river Thames, but which at Liver- pool amounts to more than a foot. The diurnal inequality in the interval appears to be insensible. The author has further ascertained that Bernoulli’s formule ex- pressing the height of the tide, deduced from his theory of the tides, present a very remarkable accordance with observation. Feb.4.-—“‘ Geometrical Investigations concerning the Phenomena of Terrestrial Magnetism: Second Series,-—On the number of points at which a magnetic needle can take a position vertical to the Karth’s surface.” By Thomas Stephens Davies, Esq., F.R.S. Lond. and Edin., F.R.A.S., of the Royal Military Academy, Woolwich. This paper is intended as a continuation of the one by the same author published in the last volume of the Philosophical Transac- tions* ; in which it was proposed to investigate the mathematical consequences of the hypothesis of the earth being a magnet with two poles, or centres of force, situated anywhere either within, or at the surface, and of equal intensity, but of contrary characters : with the ultimate view of verifying this hypothesis by comparing its results, so deduced, with the phenomena furnished by observation. * An abstract of Mr. Davies’s former paper appeared in Lond. and Edinb, Phil. Mag., vol. vi. p. 302-305.—Epir. Royal Society. 419 In his former paper the author had shown that on this hypothesis the magnetic equator, or the locus of the points at which the mag- netic needJe takes a horizontal position, is one single and continuous line on the surface of the earth. In this paper his object is to prove that there are always two, and never more than two, points at the earth’s surface, at which the needle takes a position vertical to the horizon. At the close of his former paper the author had deduced the equation of the curve of verticity, that is, of the curve at any point of which an infinitesimal needle being placed, it will always tend towards the centre of the earth, and consequently be vertical to the horizon at its point of intersection with the surface of the earth - but, owing to circumstances over which he had no control, he was unable, at that time, to write out an account of his investigations of the peculiar character of that curve, or to apply its properties to the determination of the latter problem: and these are more especially the objects to which the present paper is devoted. The processes to which he has had recourse, with this view, are the following. He first transforms the rectangular equation of the curve into a polar equation, and finds that in the result the radius vector is involved only in the second degree; and hence that for every value of the polar angle there are two values of the radius vector, and never more than two ; or, in other words, that no line drawn from the centre of the earth can cut the curve of verticity in more than two points. But as no means present themselves of ase certaining whether the values of (r), the polar ordinates of the curve of contact, be always real or not, or how many values of (6), the other co-ordinate to that curve, are possible for any given value of 7; he abandons this method of inquiry, contenting himself with a few deductions respecting the general form of the locus, and proceeds to employ a different method. The general system of his reasonings proceeds on the principle that as the magnetic curve itself, and the curve of verticity have one common and dependent genesis, a knowledge of the properties of the former must throw considerable light on those of the latter; and he is accordingly induced to enter into a more minute examination of the magnetic curve than had before been attempted. As both the polar and the rectangular equations of this curve are much too complex to afford any hope of success in their investigation, the author has recourse to a system of co-ordinates, which he terms the ‘angular system,” and which was suggested to him originally by the form under which Professor Playfair exhibited this equation in Ro. bison’s Mechanical Philosophy. But as he has not yet published his investigations of the differential coefficients, and other formule necessary in the application of this system, he puts his results in a form adapted to rectangular co-ordinates ; each rectangular co- ordinate being expressed in terms of his angular co-ordinates and the constants of the given equation; and by these means deduces the characters of the magnetic curve throughout its whole course. The angular equation being cos 6, + cos 6,, =2cos B, 2U2 420 Royal Society. he finds, 1°, that the two equations, the convergent and the divergent, or that in which the poles are unlike, and that in which they are like, are both expressed by this equation, and essentially included in it: 2°, that the divergent branches on one side of the magnetic axis are algebraically and geometrically continuous with the con- vergent branches on the other side; the parameter (6) being the same in both cases: 3°, that the divergent branches are assym- ptotic, and the assymptote is capable of a very simple construction ; 4°, that the continuous branches have the poles as points of in- flexion, and that these are the only points of inflexion within finite limits: 5°, that a tangent at any point of the curve, or, which is the same thing, the direction taken by a small needle placed there, admits of easy construction: 6°, that when the parameter (() is such as to cause the convergent and divergent branches to intersect, they do so in a perpendicular to the magnetic axis drawn from the poles: 7°, that the convergent branches are always concave, and the divergent always convex, to a line at right angles to the magnet, drawn from its middle,—besides other properties not less interesting, though less capable of succinct enunciation. Having separated the branches belonging to the case of like poles from those belonging to the unlike ones in the magnetic curve, the author proceeds to asimilar separation of the corresponding branches in the curve of verticity. In the former case the curve is composed of two branches infinite in length, having the magnetic axis for as- symptotes, lying above that axis, and emanating from the poles to the right and left ; and of two finite branches, continuous with those just described, and lying below the magnetic axis; one of which passes through the centre of the earth, and meets the other in the perpendicular from the middle of the axis; so that the whole system is constituted by one continuous curve, extending from negative infinite to positive infinite, and having the lines drawn from the centre of the earth to the magnetic poles as tangents at the poles ; and no part of the curve lies between these tangents. It bears in form some general resemblance to a distorted conchoid ; this curve not having either cusp or loop. In the second case, the curve is also composed. of four branches, two finite and two infinite ones; the latter having the line drawn from the centre of the earth through the middle of the magnet as assymptotes, and both lying on the same: side of it as the more distant pole; and the finite branches joining these continuously at the poles, and each other in the mid- dle of the magnetic axis; the one from the nearer pole lying above the axis, and the one from the remoter pole lying below it. The branches, where they unite at the poles, have the lines drawn from the centre of the earth to the poles as tangents, and the Jower in- finite branch passes through the centre. The whole system of branches is comprised between the polar tangents; and the two systems are mutually tangential at the poles, and intersect each other at the centre; but they have no other point in common. Lastly, the author proceeds to demonstrate that a circle (namely, the magnetic meridian) described from the centre of the curve of verticity, will always cut the convergent system in two points, but Royal Society. 421 can never cut it in more than two. He remarks, however, that if we could conceive two poles of like kinds to exist without any other whatsoever, we might have either four points of verticity, or only two, according to circumstances ; but he waves the discussion of this particular case, as being irrelevant to the purpose of his present inquiry. Mr. Davies announces his intention of shortly laying before the Society a continuation of these researches; devoting the next series to the points of maximum intensity. “ Memoir on the Metamorphoses in the Macroura, or Long- tailed Crustacea, exemplified in the Prawn (Palemon serratus).” By John V.Thompson, Esq.,F.L.S., Deputy Inspector-General of Hospi- tals. Communicated by Sir James Macgrigor, M.D., F.R.S., &c. Theauthor gives descriptions, illustrated by outline figures, of three different stages of growth of the Prawn; the first being that of the larva immediately on its exclusion from the egg ; the second, at a later period, when it has acquired an additional pair of cleft mem- bers, and a pair of scales on each side of the tail ; and the third, at a still more advanced stage of development, when it presents the general appearance of the adult Prawn, but still retains the natatory division of the members, now increased to six pair. The author thinks it probable that an intermediate stage of metamorphosis exists between the two last of these observed conditions of the animal. Feb. 11.—A paper was in part read, entitled, “ On Voltaic Com- binations.” Ina letter addressed to Michael Faraday, Esq., D.C.L., F.R.S. Fullerian Professor of Chemistry in the Royal Institution of Great Britain, &c., &c. By John Frederick Daniell, Esq., F.R.S., Professor of Chemistry in King’s College, London. Feb. 18.—The reading of Mr. Daniell’s paper, entitled, “ On Vol- taic Combinations,” in a letter to Michael Faraday, Esq., D.C.L., F.R.S., &c., was resumed and concluded. The author, after expressing his obligations to Mr. Faraday for the important light which hislate researches in electricityhave thrown on chemical science*, proceeds to state that in pursuing the train of inquiry which has thus been opened, he has obtained further confir- mations of the truth of that great principle discovered and esta- blished by Mr. Faraday, namely, the definite chemical action of electricity ; and has thence been led to the construction of a voltaic arrangement which furnishes a constant current of electricity for any required length of time. For the purpose of ascertaining the influence exerted by the dif- ferent parts of the voltaic battery in their various forms of combi- * The greater part of Mr. Faraday’s Experimental Researches in Elec- tricity will be found entire in Lond. and Edinb. Phil. Mag., vol. iii., vol. v., vol. vi.; and of his other Series abstracts have been given in Phil. Mag. and Annals, N.S., vol. xi., and in the succeeding volumes of Lond. and Edinb. Phil. Mag. Mr. Faraday’s Seventh Series, on the definite chemical action of Electricity, appeared in Lond. and Edinb. Phil. Mag., vol. v. p. 161; and his Tenth Series, on the construction of the Voltaic Battery, in our present volume, p. 114,—Eprr. 422 Royal Society. nation, he contrived an apparatus, which he designates by the name of the dissected battery, and which consists of ten cylindrical glass cells, capable of holding the fluid electrolytes, in which two plates of metal are immersed ; each plate communicating below, by means of a separate wire, which is made to perforate a glass stopper closing the bottom of the cell, with a small quantity of mercury, contained in a separate cup underneath the stopper, and with which electric communications may bemade at pleasure through other wires passing out of the vessel on each side. ‘The active elements of the circuit, which were adopted as standards of comparison, were, for the me- tals, plates of platinum and amalgamated zinc three inches in length by one in breadth; and for the electrolyte, water acidulated with sulphuric acid, in the proportion of 100 parts by volume of the for- mer to 2-25 of the latter; this degree of dilution (giving a spe- cific gravity of 1:0275,) being adopted, in order to connect the au- thor’s experiments with those of Mr. Faraday. This dilute acid exerts scarcely any local action on amalgamated zinc ; because the surface of the metal becomes covered with bub- bles of hydrogen gas, which adhere strongly to it; and this force of heterogeneous adhesion appears to have an important influence on the phenomena both of local and of current affinity, and soon puts a stop to the decomposition of the water by the zinc. When a small quantity of nitric acid is added to the acidulated water, the same plate which in the former experiment resisted the action of the diluted sulphuric acid, is, in a few hours, entirely dissolved, without the extrication of any gaseous matter. This result is ex- plained by the author on the supposition that the elements of the nitric acid enter into combination with the hydrogen as it is evolved, and that the opposing attraction of this latter substance is thus re- moved. The author finds, in like manner, that nascent hydrogen deoxidates copper, and precipitates it from its solutions upon the negative plate of the voltaic circuit. A series of experiments performed with the dissected battery is next described ; illustrating, in a striking manner, the difference of effects with relation to the quantity and the intensity of the electric current, consequent on the different modes of connecting the ele- ments of the battery: the former property being chiefly exhibited when the plates of the respective metals are united together so as to constitute a single pair; and the latter being exalted when the separate pairs are combined in alternate series. The influence of different modifications of these arrangements, and the effects of the interposition of pairs in the reverse order, operating as causes of retardation, are next inquired into. In the course of these researches, the author, being struck with the great extent of negative metallic surface over which the deoxi- dating influence of the positive metal appeared to manifest itself, as is shown more especially in the cases where a large sheet of cop- per is protected from corrosion by a piece of zinc or iron of com- paratively very small dimensions, was induced to institute a more careful examination of the circumstances attending this class of phe- nomena ; and was thus led to discover the cause of the variations Linnean Society. 423 and progressive decline of the power of the ordinary voltaic battery, one of the principal of which is the deposit of the zinc on the platina [or copper] plates ; and to establish certain principles from which a method of counteracting this evil may be derived. The particular construction which he has devised for the attainment of this object, and which he denominates the constant battery, consists of a hollow copper cylinder, containing within it a membranous tube formed by the gullet of an ox, in the axis of which is placed a cylindrical rod of zinc. The dilute acid is poured into the membranous tube from above by means of a funnel, and passes off, as occasion requires, by a siphon tube at the lower part; while the space between the tube and the sides of the copper cylinder is filled with a solution of sul- phate of copper, which is preserved in a state of saturation by a quantity of this substance suspended in it by a cullender, allowing it to percolate in proportion as it is dissolved. Two principal objects are accomplished by this arrangement ; first, the removal out of the circuit of the oxide of zinc, the deposit of which is so injurious to the continuance of the effect of the common battery ; and, secondly, the absorption of the hydrogen evolved upon the surface of the copper, without the precipitation of any substance which would lead to counteract the voltaic action of that surface. The first is com- pletely effected by the suspension of the zinc rod in the interior membranous cell into which fresh acidulated water is allowed slowly to drop, in proportion as the heavier solution of the oxide of zinc is withdrawn from the bottom of the cell by the siphon tube. The second object is attained by charging the exterior space sur- rounding the membrane with a saturated solution of sulphate of copper, instead of diluted acid ; for, on completing the circuit, the electric current passes freely through this solution, and no hydrogen makes its appearance upon the conducting plate; but a beautiful pink coating of pure copper is precipitated upon it, and thus perpe- tually renews its surface. When the whole battery is properly arranged and charged in this manner, it produces a perfectly equal and steady current of electri- city for many hours together. It possesses also the further advan- tages of enabling us to get rid of all local action by the facility it affords of applying amalgamated zinc ; of allowing the replacement of the zinc rods at a very trifling expense ; of securing the total absence of any wear of the copper; of requiring no employment of nitric acid, but substituting in its stead materials of greater cheap- ness, namely, sulphate of copper, and oil of vitriol; the total ab- sence of any annoying fumes ; and lastly, the facility and perfection with which all metallic communications may be made and their ar- rangements varied. LINNZEAN SOCIETY. April 5.—A paper was read, entitled, “ On the Ovula of Santalum album ; by William Griffith, Esq., Assistant Surgeon in the Madras Medical Service: communicated by R. H. Solly, Esq-, F.L.S.” In this paper are detailed minute observations on the fecundation of Santalum album, carried on through all the stages of that process, 424 Royal Society of Edinburgh. and throwing additional light on the subjects investigated by Mr. Brown, in his papers on the Sexual Organs and mode of Impregna- tion in Orchide@ and Asclepiadee, of which abstracts were given in Phil. Mag. and Annals, N.S., vol. x. p. 437; and Lond. and Edinb. Phil. Mag., vol. i. p. 70. A paper was also read, containing particulars of the lives of the two eminent botanists of the early part of the last century, named Sherard,—especially of William Sherard, who founded the Professor- ship of Botany at Oxford which bears his name,—and of Dillenius, who was appointed the first professor upon that foundation ; derived from the papers of the celebrated Peter Collinson, and communicated to the Society by Aylmer Bourke Lambert, Esq., V.P.L.S. William Sherard was appointed English consul at Smyrna, where he made large collections of plants, which he brought to England with him, and with the assistance of his brother, James Sherard, commenced the preparation of his Pinax. James Sherard afterwards | became possessed of a botanical garden at Eltham, in which he cul- tivated the plants of the Hortus Elthamensis. It is mentioned as a point of some curiosity, that Dillenius, though attached to the study of mosses, which are among the most diminu- tive of plants, was himself “ tall and clumsy.” Notices are alse given of Catesby, author of the “Natural History of Carolina ;”” among these it is stated that the plates illustrating the works of both Dillenius and Catesby were all drawn as well as engraved by the authors themselves, and the works produced under circumstances of great discouragement. ROYAL SOCIETY OF EDINBURGH. Feb. 15.—The award of the Keith Prize to Professor Forbes having been announced by the Council on the 18th of January, the medal was presented by Dr. Hope, the Vice-President in the Chair, ac- companied by an address to the following effect. The prize founded by ourlate estimable associate Mr. Keith, whose ingenious contrivances for self-registering thermometers and baro- meters are recorded in our Transactions, is, by the regulation of his Trustees, to be adjudged biennially for the most important discovery communicated to the Royal Society, or in the event of such being wanting, for the best paper which shall have been presented to the Society in the space of two years on ascientific subject. The Coun- cil, in discharge of the powers vested in them, have awarded unani- mously the Keith prize for the last biennial period, to Professor Forbes, for his paper ‘‘ On the Refractionand Polarization of Heat,” which they consider to come under that class of communications, which contain discoveries important to science. The Vice-President then observed, that the subject of heat is one so important to man, and so intimately connected with a variety of natural phenomena, that it has not failed to command a great de- gree of attention in all ages:—That an intimate connexion subsists between Heat and Light, and that much discordance of opinion has subsisted respecting the nature of both. He next stated the various opinions entertained concerning them, and particularly respecting Refraction and Polarization of Heat. 425 heat, and in historic order presented the views of Bacon, Boyle, Boerhaave, Stahl, and Black, and adverted to the discoveries of Black respecting latent and specific heat, and the successive labours of Irvine, Crawfurd, Wilke, Magellan, Lavoisier and Laplace, Dulong and Petit, in the same field. Heat presents itself in two very different conditions ; first when combined with matter, pervading bodies slowly, either by commu- nication and conduction through and among its particles, or by the movements of the particles themselves; secondly, when radiated, moving through elastic fluids or empty space with vast velocity. The first of these had been studied by the philosophers already named, and not long after by Rumford. To the second of these, viz. radiant heat, the subject of Professor Forbes’s discovery called upon him more especially to allude, and to present a brief historic view. The radiation of cold, and its reflection by metallic mirrors, was known to Baptista Porta in the sixteenth century ; and observations were made on the radiation of heat, by the Florentine academicians, towards the middle of the seventeenth century, and by Marriotte in 1682. About the middle of the 18th century, Lambert published his works on pyrometry and photometry, which contained some of the first accurate experiments on this subject ; and the facts of the difficult transmission and reflection of heat by glass, were pointed out by the Swedish chemist Scheele. Pictet of Geneva extended his experiments on the radiation and the reflection of the heat de- rived from boiling water; and our venerable associate Professor Pre- vost of the same place, established the doctrine of the mobile equi- librium of heat, in 1802. The triumph of this theory was found in the beautiful experiments of Dr. Wells, on dew, in 1813. Meanwhile, the experiments of Rumford and Leslie were corro- borating and extending these general views, even although the doc- trines of radiation were denied by the latter philosopher in all his writings. The passage of radiant heat through solid substances, such as glass, and through fluids, such as water, had long been ad- mitted, in the case where light accompanied heat. But in the case of non-luminous heat, it was strenuously denied by Leslie, and others. The experiments of De la Roche proved that such was the fact, at least in the case of heat derived from terrestrial sources, and at the same time luminous. But this subject has received a vast enlarge- ment by the recent experiments of Melloni, who has shown that substances differ surprisingly in their permeability to heat, and that while some, such as alum, stop almost every incident ray, others, as rock-salt, transmit almost the whole of the heat, and that from whatever source derived, The connexion of light with heat was too obvious and important to be overlooked. To Sir W. Herschel the world is indebted for the first great step in this curious inquiry. He examined the ther- mometric qualities of the spectrum formed from the sun’s rays bya common prism of glass ; and in 1800 announced the curious fact, that the heating power increases, not only from the violet to the red end of the spectrum, but even beyond the latter, indicating the exist- ence of dark calorific rays. These experiments, though at first denied 426 Royal Society of Edinburgh :—Prof. Forbes’s Experiments by some authors, were afterwards fully confirmed, and some ano- malies which they presented, explained, by Robison, Englefield, Berard, Seebeck*, and Melloni. Heat, then, even unaccompanied by light, appears to be capable both of reflection and refraction. But new modifications of light, discovered of late years, require us to investigate how far the ana- logy may be pursued. In 1802, Dr. Young announced his remark- able discovery of the interference of the rays of light, or the power of two luminous rays, properly disposed, to produce darkness by their union, About the year 1808, Malus, a most eminent French phi- losopher and mathematician, discovered the remarkable modification which light undergoes by reflection from certain substances at cer- tain angles. This modification may be easiest conceived by stating the fact, that light so reflected becomes incapable of undergoing a second reflection in certain positions of the reflecting surface, when common light would be reflected. The corresponding experiment in the case of heat was tried by Berard, along with Malus, about the year 1811, and an account of them was published in 1817, in the Mémozres d’ Arcueil. They found, that when the solar beam was twice reflected in the manner just stated, the heat and light refused simultaneously to be reflected in certain positions of the second reflector. The same experiment was repeated with incandescent bodies, with the same result ; and even, as stated by Berard, with bodies having temperatures beneath that of visible incandescence. These experiments were probably discon- tinued in consequence of the death of Malus, and the details were never published, if, indeed, they were ever carried to any great ex- tent. The result has been, that Berard’s conclusion seems not to have been generally adopted by the scientific world. The po- larization of heat has remained amongst the doubtful facts in sci- ence. It has been adopted in scarcely any systematic works, whether British or foreign: and, of late years, direct evidence seemed to be entirely against it. Professor Powell of Oxford, re- peatedly and fruitlessly, attempted to obtain Berard’s result. No- bili of Florence (whose recent loss science has to deplore) attempted it likewise with the aid of his thermo-multiplier, an instrument ad- mirably adapted for the measurement of small quantities of heat ; and Melloni having failed to polarize even luminous heat by tourma- lines, concurs in the conclusions of Powell and Nobili. The Vice- President then observed, that it was under these circumstances that the subject was undertaken by Professor Forbes, who, by means of arrangements differing from any that had before been used, has suc- ceeded in completely establishing the polarization of heat under all the circumstances in which light is polarized, namely, by Reflection, Transmission, and Double Refraction, and that it is for the esta- blishment of these facts that the Keith Prize has been awarded by the Council}. * Seebeck’s memoir on this subject will be found in Phil. Mag., First Se- ries, vol. lxvi. p. 330. e¢ seg.—Enrr. + Prof. Forbes’s paper establishing these facts will be found at large in Lond. and Edinb. Phil. Mag., vol. vi. p. 134, e¢ seg. See also vol. vii. p. 349.—Enir. on the Refraction and Polarization of Heat. AQT Dr. Hope then stated that, in the ordinary case of the publication of papers, the Society holds itself in no degree responsible for the truth of the facts stated therein; but, in the adjudication of prizes, the case is different; and that, with regard to them, the Council are bound to be satisfied of the truth of the statements for which they award their prize. Several memhers of the Council had seen and satisfied themselves of the accuracy of Mr. Forbes’s leading ex- periments before the Keith Prize was awarded ; and, some days ago, he deemed it right to request Mr. Forbes to show him the more im- portant of these experimental demonstrations. ‘This he succeeded in doing in a way which left upon his mind not the slightest doubt as to the truth of his results ; the variations of temperature being so obviously displayed, as to prevent the slightest ambiguity as to the true source from which they are derived. The instrument employed in the research is the thermo-multiplier, of which the invention is due to Nobili, though it has been greatly improved for experimental purposes by Melloni. Professor Forbes has likewise increased greatly its power of indicating the more delicate effects by employing a te- lescopic apparatus, which enables him to measure a quantity of heat, perhaps not exceeding one fifteen hundredth part of a degree of Fahrenheit. That the Society may fully understand the nature of the proofs afforded by Mr. Forbes’s experiments, reference must be made to the correlative facts observed in the case of light. When light undergoes reflection from glass at an angle of 56°, its physical character is found to be thus far altered, that it refuses to bea second time reflected by another plate of glass placed to receive the ray at the same angle of 56°, if the plane of incidence on the second glass be perpendicular to the plane of incidence on the first. The light is then wholly transmitted by the second plate. If the plane of incidence be the same for the two plates, complete reflec- tion takes place at the second plate. This illustrates polarization by reflection. If a number of glass plates be used, and light transmitted obliquely through such a bundle of plates, it is in like manner found, that the emergent light is wholly transmitted by a second similar bundle placed parallel to the first, but is almost wholly reflected, and therefore not transmitted, when the second bundle is placed so that whilst the ray falls upon it at the same angle as upon the first, the plane of in- cidence on the second bundle is perpendicular to the plane of inci- dence upon the first bundle. This is polarization by transmission or refraction. Lastly, It was observed before the close of the 17th century by Huyghens, that certain bodies, as Iceland spar, endowed with the property of double refraction, alter at the same time the character of the light in thetwo refractedrays. So that,if two sections similarly cut from a crystal of Iceland spar be placed upon one another in conformable positions, or the respective positions which they occu- pied on the crystal, the two rays will proceed through the second slice as they did through the first, and be refracted according to the 428 Royal Society of Edinburgh. same laws. But if the second slice be placed unconformably upon the first, or turned round a quarter of a circle, the ray, which at first was ordinarily refracted, is now extraordinarily refracted; and the ray, which at first was extraordinarily, is now ordinarily refracted. Now, it has been found that some crystals, such as tourmaline, pos- sess the property, first, of dividing these rays, and then of suppress- ing or absorbing one of them; the result of which is, that when two tourmalines, cut as we have supposed, are placed conformably, the ray which was not suppressed by the first slice, still makes its way through the second; but, when placed unconformably, the ray trans- mitted by the first plate is wholly suppressed by the second. In the latter case, therefore, not a ray of light can penetrate the two plates. This is polarization produced by double refraction. Now, all these modes of polarization have been recognised by Mr. Forbes in the case of neat, and even in the case of heat wholly unaccompanied by light. The Vice-President announced that he had witnessed this in the most satisfactory manner in the case of heat polarized by reflection and transmission, for which purposes, instead of glass, (which permits scarcely any non-luminous heat to penetrate it,) Mr. Forbes employs plates of mica, divided by a pecu- liar process into extremely thin laminz. But the analogies which he has established between light and heat do not stop here. It has been foundin the case of light, that, when the two reflecting plates before spoken of, or the two crystals, are placed in wnconformable positions, so that little or no light reaches the eye, we may, by interposing between the plates or the crystals a thin lamina of a doubly refracting substance (such as mica) in a certain position (relatively to its internal structure), cause a portion of light, which before was incapable of reaching the eye, to become capable of so doing. In other words, the polarized light, which at first was incapable of reflection or transmission at the second plate or crystal, now becomes capable of it; it has lost, to a certain ex- tent, its character of polarization, or it is said to be depolarized. Dr. Hope stated, that he had seen this to be most completely ef- fected in the case of heat, by Mr. Forbes. A lamina of mica is in- terposed between the bodies used to polarize heat unconformably placed. When the lamina of mica has a certain position, no effect is produced beyond stopping a small portion of the heat, which would otherwise reach the thermometer; but when this interposed lamina is turned 45° in its own plane, a portion of the heat which before was incapable of reaching the thermometer in consequence of its polarization, is now capable of doing so, and the influx of heat is instantly indicated. The most striking exemplification of this re- sult is found in the fact, which excited so much interest when com- municated more than a year ago to the Society, that in certain cases the mere interposition of a piece of mica (in the proper situation), will cause an immediate indication of increased temperature, the mica depolarizing more heat than it stops. Since depolarization takes place only in consequence of double refraction, we have here an- other undoubted proof of the double refraction of heat. Cambridge Philosophical Society. 429 The Vice-President terminated his general and rapid sketch, in which he alluded to the brilliant discoveries of Brewster, Arago, and Fresnel, respecting the polarization of light,by observing that it would be needless for him to point out the important bearing of these facts on the question of the nature of heat, and its connexion with light. He concluded in the following terms :—“It now only remains for me to present to Professor Forbes the medal which has been award- ed to him for these discoveries. I believe that I shall be joined cor- dially by every member of the Society who now hears me, in the fervent wish that it may be the will of the Almighty Ruler, that his life may be long protracted, with vigour of mind and health of body to pursue the career in which he has made an advancement so ho- nourable to himself, and’reflecting lustre upon those great establish- ments, the University and the Royal Society, with which he is con- nected. I cannot doubt that he will persevere in this happy path with the same ardour and success which have hitherto accompanied his researches. Indeed, we have a gratifying proof that his zeal will not be impaired, nor his success less brilliant, from the discovery in the same field announced by him at the last meeting of the Society, of the Circular Polarization of Heat*.” CAMBRIDGE PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY. (Continued from p. 80.) Feb. 22.—A paper was read by Mr. Kelland, of Queen’s College, * On the application of the hypothesis of finite intervals to the expla- nation of the phenomena of dispersion.” The object of this paper was to show, that by supposing, as M. Cauchy has done, the distance between two consecutive particles of the medium of light to bear a finite ratio to the length of wave, the phenomena of dispersion are satisfactorily accounted for. Numerical calculations are entered into for the purpose of verifying the formula in all the cases which M. Frauenhofer has examined. The fact that a star appears to us as a point, and not a spectrum, compels the author to the conclusion that the medium of light is more dense in vacuo than in refract- ing media, a conclusion in opposition to generally received opinions, It is also a consequence of the above circumstance, as applied to the author’s formula, that the forces which the particles exert on each other follow the lawof the inverse square of the distance, and also that the vibrations must be transversal. The author added, that by the formula he had investigated, a marked difference was found in the results when applied to M. Frauenhofer’s seven solids and three * This discovery is announced in the Proceedings of the Society for Feb. 1, 1836, in the following terms :—“ Professor Forbes verbally communicated to the Meeting, that he had succeeded in proving the Circular Polarization of Heat, whether accompanied or unaccompanied by Light, when polarized heat is made to undergo two total reflections within a rhomb of rock-salt ; the plane of total reflection being inclined 45° to the plane of primitive po- larization.” Prof. Forbes also announced his discovery in our Number for March last, at p. 248 of the present volume.—Eprr. 430 Cambridge Philosophical Society. fluids; for the former a particular function of the forces was always negative—tor the latter always positzve ; which remarkable circum- stance the author thinks will lead to the most important conse- quences in the theory of molecular actions, The Rev. Mr. Whewell madesome remarks on the present state of our knowledge of the tides. He stated that recent researches have completely changed the position of this subject ; observation is now in advance of theory, as, a little while ago, theory was in advance of observation. It has been shown that the inequalities depending on the moon’s hour of transit, declination, and parallax follow with great exactness the laws resulting from the hypothesis of a spheroid of equilibrium, slightly modified. In addition to this, it has recently been discovered that the diurnal inequality of the tides agrees in general circumstances with the equilibrium hypothesis, and that there is a solar inequality also agreeing with the same hypothesis, The observer may now, therefore, call upon the mathematician to investigate the result of some theory agreeing more nearly with the state of the case than those of Bernoulii and Laplace, and thus to bring the calculation into accordance with the observed quantities. It was remarked further, that this must be solved as a problem of hydrodynamics, not of hydrostatics; but that it does not appear likely that a satisfactory solution will be obtained, except we take into account the retarding forces, as well as the attractive forces and the condition of perfect fluidity. ‘This being almost the only mechanical problem yet unsolved, which is requisite for the com- pletion of the theory of universal gravitation, was put forward as a subject well worthy the attention of mathematicians. March 7.—Mr. Whewell gave an account of the recent discoveries made by Prof. Forbes, and other philosophers, with respect to the pola- rization of heat. Ele stated that Prof. Forbes had recently obtained an additional confirmation of this discovery, by finding that heat, by two internal reflexions in a rhomb of rock-salt, resembling Fresnel’s rhomb, becomes circularly polarized under the same circumstances as light. It was also mentioned that Biot and Melloni have very recently ascertained that heat acquires circular polarization by trans- mission along the axis of a crystal of quartz.* The Rev. Mr. Willis then explained his views respecting the com- position of the entablature of Grecian buildings. He observed that this feature in the architecture of Egypt consisted of two members, arising from the mode there adopted of roofing a building with beams of stone, resting on the pillars, and supporting transverse slabs. The upper member being resolved into two, the three divisions of archi- trave, frieze, and cornice were produced; and the portion of the mass which belongs to each of these members may be determined by observing in what manner they are managed when the entabla- ture is resolved into parts by cross-trabeation. It appears in this way (and also by the principles which, Vitruvius implies in giving his rules) that each member consists of a vertical face capped by * See the report of proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, in the preceding page. Camden Institution. 431 some projecting mouldings ; the term cymatium denotes this group of mouldings in all cases; and not, as has hitherto been supposed, a particular form of moulding. The entablature in the simplest cases consists of architrave, frieze, corona, each with its cymatium, and the sima above; in more complex cases there are inserted also the denticulus, and the modillion-bund, each of which has likewise its cymatium, March 21.—A memoir was read by S. Earnshaw, Esq., of St. John’s College, ‘* On the Integration of the Equation of Continuity of Fluids in Motion;” alsoa memoir by Professor Miller on the Measurement of the Axes of Optical Elasticity of certain Crystals. This memoir contained various determinations, from which it appears that the law concerning the connexion of the crystalline and the optical properties of crystals suggested by Professor Neumann, namely, that the optical axes are the axes of crystalline simplicity, is false ; but that it is true, in many of the cases hitherto examined, that one of the optical axes coincides with the axis of a principal cry- stalline zone. Afterwards Mr. Webster, of Trinity College, made some obser- vations on the periodical and occasional changes of the height of the barometer, and on their connexion with the changes of tempera- ture arising from the seasons and from the condensation of aqueous vapour. CAMDEN LITERARY AND PHILOSOPHICAL INSTITUTION. January 26th.—A very perfect specimen of the Ornithorhynchus paradoxus was shown to the meeting, and its peculiarities described. Mr. Saxton exhibited a very ingenious and simple piece of ma- chinery, by which the rolling of a ship labouring in aheavy sea was perfectly imitated. Mr. J. de C. Sowerby, F.L.S., in laying before the members some cases of fossil shells from the London clay, arecent donation to the Institution, suggested a plan for the advantageous arrangement of fossils in reference to the strata in which they are found; and pre- sented a specimen of an undescribed fossil Nautilus from the green sand. Mr. Wilson addressed the meeting on the characters of two fine skulls of the African* Orang Outang. By reference to the skulls of other animals he pointed out the comparative peculiarities of the head for the accommodation of the senses of sight, smell, hearing, and taste. The extraordinary development of the teeth and jaws in the African* Orang, in harmony with the nature of its food, * Mr. Wilson seems inadvertently to have transposed these local desig- nations: the Chimpanzee ( T'roglodytes niger, Geoff.) is the African, and the ordinary Orang Outang (Simia Satyrus, Auct.) the Asiatic animal; the spe- cimen of the former recently living in the menagerie of the Zoological Society, was brought from the Gambia coast. See our last volume, p. 161, aiso p. 72; and vol. vi. p.457. Should the subject require further expla- nation, perhaps Mr, Wilson will have the goodness to supply it.—E. W. B, 432 Intelligence and Miscellaneous Articles. and serving also as instruments of offence and defence, gave rise to the necessity for immense spines and ridges for the attachment of the muscles ; impressing on the animal an aspect of ferocity. The skull of the female was more smooth, the prominences less pro- duced ; characteristic of the milder nature of the animal. In some of the lower monkeys, viewed horizontally, the bulk of the face concealed entirely the arch of the skull; as.the animals assumed a more docile disposition the vault of the skull rose gradually, until a forehead of considerable dimensions was perceived. The skull of the male was narrow above, broad and expanding at the base, and obtusely flattened behind ; evincing a destructive and ferocious dis- position, and the absence of regard for offspring. In the female, the arch of the skull was broad above, narrower below, and length- ened out behind ; displaying Jess ferocity of disposition, more cir- cumspection, and tenderness for offspring. Compared with the Chimpanzee or Asiatic* Orang at present in the Zoological Gardens, these skulls, although much larger in size, were very inferior in perfection of development to that animal. Mr. Sowerby then read a paper upon the “ Habits of the Plecotus auritus,” the Long-eared Bat, which was followed by an interesting discussion. The paper itself was inserted in our last Number, p. 265. LXXV. Intelligence and Miscelldneous Articles. Views on Screntiric anp Generat Epucation, applied to the pro- posed System of Instruction in the South African College. By Sir John F. W. Herschel, M.A., F.R.S., &c. ie is with great pleasure that we observe from the local publica- tions of the British Colony in Southern Africa, that in that distant region, as in his own country, Sir John Herschel,—while devoting his main attention and energy to the advancement and extension of that branch of Astronomy of which his revered father and himself may be considered at once the founders and to a very great extent the finishers also,—yet directs his powerful and accomplished mind to more general objects, and especially to the improvement of Educa- tion, and the application to that purpose of the resources derivable from the most recent advances which science and literature have made. ‘The following letter addressed by Sir John to the Rev. Dr. Adamson, relative to the proposed scheme of instruction in the South- African College, will prove we think as interesting to our readers as we have found it, and it will amply justify the remarks with which we have now introduced it to their attention. A good practical system of public education ought, in my opinion, to be more real than formal; I mean, should convey much of positive knowledge with as little attention to mere systems and conventional forms as is con- sistent with avoiding solecisms. This principle, carried into detail, would allow much less weight to the study of languages, especially of dead lan - * See the note in the preceding page. Sir John F. W. Herschel’s Views on Public Education. 433 guages, than is usually considered its due in our great public schools, where, in fact, the acquisition of the latter seems to be regarded as the one and only object of education. While on the other hand it would attach great importance to all those branches of practical and theoretical know- ledge whose possession goes to constitute an idea of a well-informed gen- tleman, as, for example—a knowledge of the nature and constitution of the world we inhabit—its animal, vegetable, and mineral productions, and their uses and properties as subservient to human wants. Its relation to the system of the universe, and its natural and political subdivisions; and last and most important of all, the nature and propensities of man himself, as developed in the history of nations and the biography of individuals ; the constitutions of human society, including our responsibilities to indi- viduals and to the social body of which we are members. In a word, as extensive a knowledge as can be grasped and conveyed in an elementary course of the actual system and laws of nature both physical and moral. Again, in a country where free institutions prevail, and where public opinion is of consequence, every man is to a certain extent a legislator; and for this his education (especially when the Government of the country lends its aid and sanction to it) ought at least so far to prepare him, as to place him on his guard against those obvious and popular fallacies which lie across the threshold of this as well as of every other subject with which human reason has anything to do. Every man is called upon to obey the laws, and therefore it cannot be deemed superfluous that some portion of every man’s education should consist in informing him what they are. On these grounds it would seem to me that some knowledge of the principles of political economy—of jurisprudence—of trade and manu- factures—is essentially involved in the notion of a sound education. A moderate acquaintance also with certain of the useful arts, such as prac- tical mechanics or engineering—agriculture—draftsmanship—is of obvious utility in every station of life ;—while in a commercial country the only remedy for that proverbial short-sightedness to their best ultimate interest. which is the misfortune rather than the fault of every mercantile commu-: nity upon earth, seems to be, to inculcate as a part of education, those broad principles of free interchange and reciprocal profit, and public justice, on which the whole edifice of permanently successful enterprise must be based. The exercise and development of our reasoning faculties is another grand object of education, and is usually considered, and in a certain sense justly, as most likely to be attained by a judicious course of mathematical in- struction—while it stands if not opposed to, at least in no natural con- nexion with, the formal and conventional departments of knowledge (such as grammar, and the so-called Aristotelian logic). It must be recollected, however, that there are minds which, though not devoid of reasoning pow- ers, yet manifest a decided inaptitude for mathematical studies, —which are estimative not calculating, and which are more impressed by analogies, and by apparent preponderance of general evidence in argument than by ma- thematical demonstration, where all the argument is on one side and no show of reason can be exhibited on the other. The mathematician listens only to one side of a question, for this plain reason, that no strictly mathe- matical question has more than one side capable of being maintained other- wise than by simple assertion; while all the great questions which arise in busy life and agitate the world, are stoutly disputed, and often with a show of reason on both sides, which leaves the shrewdest at a loss fora decision. This, or something like it, has often been urged by those who contend against what they consider an undue extension of mathematical studies in oumUniversities. But those who have urged the objection have stopped a3 Third Series. Vol. 8. No, 48. May 1836, 2X 434 Intelligence and Miscellaneous Articles. short of the remedy. It is essential, however, to fill this enormous blank in every course of education which has hitherto been acted on, by a due provision of some course of study and instruction which shall meet the difficulty, by showing how valid propositions are to be drawn, not from premises which virtually contain them in their very words, as is the case with abstract propositions in mathematics, nor from the juxtaposition of other propositions assumed as true, as in the Aristotelian logic, but from the broad consideration of an assemblage of facts and circumstances brought under review. This is the scope of the Inductive Philosophy— applicable, and which ought to be applied (though it never yet has fairly been so) to all the complex circumstances of human life; to politics, mo- rals, and legislation; to the guidance of individual conduct, and that of nations. I cannot too strongly recommend this to the consideration of those who are now to decide on the normal course of instruction to be adopted in your College. Let them have the glory—for glory it will really be—to have given a new impulse to public instruction, by placing the Wo- vum Organum for the first time in the hands of young men educating for active life, as a text book, and as a regular part of their College course. It is strong meat, I admit, but it is manly nutriment; and though imper- fectly comprehended, (as it must be at that age when the college course terminates,) the glimpses caught of its meaning, under a due course of col- lateral explanation, will fructify in after life, and like the royal food with which the young bee is fed, will dilate the frame, and transform the whole habit and ceconomy. Of course it should be made the highest book for the most advanced classes. Among branches of knowledge purely formal, langnage of course stands foremost. Its importance is doubtless great as the key to the depositories of knowledge, and as the most powerful instrument of human reason. Of course it must form an essential part of every system of instruction. But it should be studied as a means and not as anend. ‘The books chosen in every language (after its first rudiments are acquired) ought to be vehicles of other than mere verbal instruction, and the attention of the pupil ought to be much more strongly directed to the matter than to the words. In- deed, a foreign tongue can never be said to be in fair train of being mas- tered, till the sense is seized and the words begin to pass unheeded. Much of course will depend on the tact of the teacher in determining the point where the strictness of literal construction may be relaxed or altogether abandoned, and fluent translation substituted for it. And here I would incidentally remark, how infinitely preferable a close written translation is to any oral construing. A boy should come up ‘to construe” with his written, or even—in the case of beginning—his printed, translation in his hand ; he should read it aloud, and then be called upon to prove by literal construction that such zs the true sense of the passage. Thus and thus only can we be sure that the sense has not escaped him in the turmoil of words and rules, which it is to be feared is too often the case in the usual method. As for composition, or even translation from the vernacular into a foreign tongue, till the point of fluent construing or translation at sight is attained, I consider it as time mispent*. The usual practice at schools of setting boys who know nothing, or next to nothing, of Latin, to write Latin exercises, has always appeared to me a mere waste of their own and their master’s time. One hour spent in acquiring a fluency of rendering at sight is worth a week of such unnatural effort. * [On this point we venture to express our dissent, We are inclined to think that these two species of exercises, simultaneously practised, assist and test each other,—R. T.] Sir John F. W. Herschel’s Views on Public Education. 435 So soon as any of the pupils, in the opinion of the masters, shall have acquired such a degree of proficiency in a foreign or dead language that it can be done with advantage, I should be disposed to recommend, in pur- suance of the principle above laid down, that its study as a mere language should be abandoned, and that such proficients as a distinction and a re- ward, should be drafted into a separate class, and commence the study of some subject competent to their age, in that language. This would secure one material advantage, viz. that, in pursuance of asubject, amuch greater quantity of the half-acquired tongue can be made to pass through the channels of the mind than in the mere conning over of stated passages as exercises, and that a familiarity is thereby acquired with its forms and idioms which can never be attained by the study of rules, or by any assi- duity in construing and parsing. Historical works, as exciting the atten- tion, following out a connected story, and requiring the perusal of many pages at a sitting, seem particularly adapted to this purpose. Those of Livy, Cesar, and even Tacitus, in the Latin; of Schiller in German ; and the spirited biographies of Charles and Peter, by Voltaire, in French, may be taken as exemplifying the proposed method. In this colony, and more especially in Cape Town, two languages are habitually spoken among those classes who may be expected to send their sons to college, and a question may arise which of those should be taught in the vernacular language of the country, and made the vehicle of in- struction in the college. As to the latter point, convenience, of course, must be consulted. It would cripple the institution of half its power te carry on two distinct courses of tuition, under masters exclusively English and exclusively Dutch, besides being otherwise mischievous. Probably no parent would be found so culpably negligent of his child’s future comfort and advancement, as to allow him to attain the age of admission entirely ignorant of English. Such entire ignorance ought, I think, to operate as a bar to admission. Considering also that this is, and will in all human probability remain for centuries to come, a British possession ; that com- munications with Britain are constant and increasing; British settlers ar- riving yearly, and British habits gaining ground, I should conceive that, ceteris paribus, so far as can be done without sacrificing what is more im- portant, a preference should be given to the English language as the me- dium of oral communication, and in the choice of elementary books. But whether the acquisition of a critical knowledge of either of these languages should be made a feature in the course of instruction, is another question. For my own part I think not, being of opinion that youths should occupy their time at school or in college in learning that which they have not opportunity or means of learning elsewhere, and that pro- vided bad grammar and vulgar expressions are corrected and reprobated whenever they occur—in speech or in writing—no other express provision for learning any language in ordinary use in the country is needed. In fact, however, neither the English nor the Dutch languages can be criti- cally studied without an acquaintance, in the latter case with the German, in the former with both that language and the Latin. A knowledge of the original meaning and mode of derivation of words is of far more import- ance than that of mere idiom and grammatical nicety, and in this view, as well as by reason of the vast intrinsic utility of the languages themselves, I would strongly urge the propriety of making both the last-mentioned lan- guages essential parts of the regular College course, and as such, to be taught indiscriminately to all the pupils, superadding French as highly desirable ; but leaving it optional with parents, and loading it with an extra payment. I should hardly think it worth while to have a Greek class, though a small vocabulary of Greek words (in the Greek character) consisting of those whose derivatives have been ee directly into our terms of 2X2 436 Intelligence and Miscellaneous Articles. art and science (without passing through the Latin) would be no doubt useful. ; I confess I do not see any valid reason for deferring the study of Latin till an advanced period. All languages are easiest learnt early, nor am I aware (when artificial difficulties, such as committing to memory the Eton Grammar, &c. are discarded,) that the Latin is more difficult to acquire than any modern language. The known fact of the readiness with which children acquire languages, as well as the degree in which the knowledge of words, both in children and in grown up persons, is often in advance of their acquaintance with their import, may, I should hope, induce you, my dear Sir, to reconsider your position, that the acquisition of general in- formation is so far a necessary or advantageous preparation for that of languages as to render it desirable to postpone the latter in point of time till the former is attained. Of the purely abstract departments of study, I shall say little, as I do not see how the mathematical course actually established in the college can well be amended, except in so far as the introduction of new branches of physical science into the course of instruction, would naturally lead to a greater development and detail of its applications, to those subjects which admit them in a form not too difficult—at the expense, perhaps, of some sacrifice of more abstruse and technical points. In what is said I would not be understood as advocating a merely uti- litarian course of instruction. Something must be conceded to ornament and elegance. The influence of a tincture of elegant literature, early im- bibed, on the tastes and habits of after life is far too important to be lost sight of. The charms of well-chosen poetry, for instance, learnt in youth, take so strong a hold on the imagination, and connect so many pleasing associations with the memory of youthful studies, that it would be a very erroneous system which would banish them as superfluous. Still the se- lection should be cautiously made, with reference to the matter as well as to the language. It is not easy to say on what defensible grounds the feeble Pastoralsof Virgil, or the whining love-letters and wild extravagancies of Ovid, are generally selected as the avenues by which the temple of the Latin Muse is to be approached, when there is quite easy Latin for the beginner, joined with pleasing narrative and far loftier and more poetical diction to be found in the Aineid, or made the vehicle for the soundest good sense, the noblest sentiments, and the most sterling wit in Horace. But the consideration of these subjects would lead to a dissertation on clas- sical literature. I will only observe that neither in the study of the Ger- man nor the Latin languages would I begin with poetical works. In advocating so considerable a range of instruction as I have done, it may be reasonably asked—how is it to be accomplished ? Without descending into a detail of each year’s work, or of the propor- tion in which the several items are to be distributed among the limited number of professors whom the funds of the Institution will support, I would observe, that in many of the subjects proposed, a very limited and extremely elementary course only is contemplated, and in some a true statement of their scope and fundamental principles in the form of an oc- casional lecture, might suffice. For example, the course of political ceco- nomy might be confined to the reading of a single elementary volume of moderate extent, such as, for example, the admirable ‘ Conversations,’ by Mrs. Marcet. In Ethics, a subject of chief importance, some standard work (such as Paley’s Moral Philosophy,) might be distributed over time so as to pervade the whole duration of each pupil’s frequenting the insti- tution. For the study of natural history, the proximity of the Museum offers great advantages. An occasional visit to that collection would form an excellent comment on whatever outline of animated nature might be Sir John F. W. Herschel’s Views on Public Education. 437 put into the hands of the junior classes. The best mode of disposing of the subject of jurisprudence would perhaps be by lecture, but on a very limited scale. A few lectures also on the useful arts—engineering and manufac- tures, might, perhaps, satisfy all the requisites of the occasion. Drawing should, of course, be taught by a drawing-master, and paid for as an extra; but the principles of perspective should be included in the course of geometry. The physical sciences—those especially which most require experimental elucidation (as all do, more or less), could hardly be taught adequately otherwise than by a regular course of lectures. As a single elementary compendium of physical science, I know nothing comparable to the ‘‘ Physics” of Dr. Arnott; but without the elucidation which experimental lectures afford, the study of this, or any other work must be insufficient to communicate distinct and satisfactory notions. No provision, however, (I believe,) exists for any such course, and as no one can be expected, or indeed ought, in justice, to be suffered to perform so extensive a task gratuitously, there is no course open but one of the fol- lowing, or a combination of them all: Ist, To establish one or two lecturing professorships, with salaries from the funds of the institution ; 2ndly, To provide for their support by fees from the pupils ; 3rdly, To apply to the public for support by subscription ; And, lastly, to apply to Government for assistance. That any, or all of these modes, independent of the last, would prove permanently sufficient, is much to be doubted. But no worthier or more truly useful application of a portion of the public treasure than for the maintenance of a high standard of education, in at least one point, the metropolis of the colony, can be imagined—supposing such an application made, and successful. The professor or professors, being APPOINTED and SALARIED by Government, it would devolve upon the resident masters of the college to enforce the attendance of their classes (for which no payment should be required), to aid their progress by a course of reading, prospec- tive and retrospective, and to estimate their proficiency by public and pri- vate examination. But in that case I would by no means confine the benefit of the lectures within the walls of the institution. The doors of the lecture-room should be thrown open, not only to the pupils, but to the public in general, on pay- ment of a small fee in aid of the professor’s salary. This would have several highlybeneficial effects: 1st, Theaugmentation of his income would be amo- tive to the professor to render hislectures intelligible andattractive. 2nd, It would afford an opportunity to many adult persons, tradesmen and others, to acquire knowledge of a kind which must be useful to themselves, and have a direct tendency to develope the internal resources of the colony. 3rdly, It would probably furnish to many an attractive counteractive of intemperate and idle habits, which mainly grow out of the absence of some object of interest enough to engage the attentiou. 4thly, It would afford to parents and relations of the pupils an authorized and no way invidious opportunity of witnessing in person the actual process of instruction to which they are subjected. Lastly, but not of least importance, should any unforeseen circumstance, such as want of funds, occur, to suspend for atime, or permanently to cripple the efficiency of the institution itself, the lecturing professors being entirely or chiefly supported from without, and independent as (in this view of the subject) they would be of its internal arrangements, would still continue to perform their duties, so that the public instruction, though grievously wounded (as it must be, by any event, so much to be deprecated) would not be entirely annihilated, and a rallying point would always be preserved for a reconstruction of a more extended system, whenever the necessary means should be forthcoming, 438 Intelligence and Miscellaneous Articles. I will here recapitulate the heads of the several branches of instruction I have above endeavoured to recommend. Laneuacers.—Latin and German, Greek Alphabet and Vocabulary;— French, evtra. History.—1. Ancient Greek, Roman (Jewish ?). 2. Modern—chiefly those of England and Holland; European and General in less detail. Natura History.—1. General subdivisions of Organic nature. 2. Particular History of the more remarkable Animals and Vegetables. -GrocrapHy.—1l. Political—Ancient and Modern. 2. Physical-—-1. Form of the Earth.—2. Traces of its former condition.—3. Natural subdivisions.—4. Climates.—5. Atmo- sphere. Winds. Seas. Tides. PuysitcaL Scrence.—Mechanics, including Hydrostatics, &c. Astro- nomy. Chemistry. Optics, &c. N.B. The climate is remarkably favourable for Optical Lectures, which might be splendid and most attractive. Usrrut Arts.—Engineering, including the nature of the Steam Engine. Agriculture and Horticulture. Draftsmanship (extra). Sociat Retations.—Ethics. Jurisprudence. Political Economy. Maruemarics.—Arithmetic, Geometry, Analysis, Applications. Inpuctive PHiLtosopuy.—Novum Organum of Bacon, omitting his specimen of the application of his own principles to the Nature of Heat. A few brief remarks on the subject of public examinations may not be irrelevant, and I should certainly not have hazarded them had I not been requested by you to state my impressions as to what may prove of benefit to the objects of the institution prospectively ; and it is in the spirit of that request, and without the slightest wish to criticise anything which I have observed in the only examination at which I have had the honour to be present, that T do so. First, then, I think it would be desirable that some portion of the ex- amination of the senior classes should be conducted in writing, and with deliberation, not only in mathematics but on other subjects. From what I have been in the habit of observing in such matters, I am disposed to think that a combination of written with oral answers, is necessary to give an effectual trial to the merits of any proficient. In the next place, I would suggest, that the number and variety of prizes given may quite as easily be too great as too small, and that a certain re- serve on this point is essential to keeping up the value of such distinctions in general. Lastly, I should be disposed to suppress altogether a practice which I have observed to exist, of the successful candidates for prizes returning thanks to their judges. There is no distinction which can possibly be awarded to a youth at college which ought not to have the immediate effect of humbling him in his own sight, and inducing him to retire in si- lence and meditation on the share which his own good fortune, or the ill- luck or diffidence of his competitors may have had in his success—on the numbers of questions which might have been proposed to him, and which he could not have answered, and on the immeasurable interval which still separates him from excellence—as well as in forming inward resolves, to let his future exertions be greater than his past. Sucha frame of mind is incompatible with any kind of public declamation. { remain, dear Sir, yours, with much esteem, J. F. W. HERSCHEL. Intelligence and Miscellaneous Articles. 439 ON THE AURORA BOREALIS OF NOVEMBER 18TH, 1835, as WITNESSED AT COLLUMPTON IN DEVONSHIRE. BY N.S. HEINEKEN. To the Editors of the Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. GENTLEMEN, In the Number of the Philosophical Magazine for this month (February) there appears to be a mistake in the date given by Mr. Sturgeon for the occurrence of the Aurora Borealisin November last, and that we should read the 18th instead of the *« 16th of Nov. 1835.” If such should be the case, allow me to state that my attention was called, by a friend, to the same phanomenon on the evening of the 18th of November. The aurora was seen here about a quarter be- fore nine o’clock, but I did not observe it until half-past, at which time it presented precisely the appearance described by Mr. Stur- geon. Waves of light appeared to roll, in rapid succession, from the horizon to the zenith, which were succeeded by columns, some- times of a yellowish and at other times of a lilac tint. The light of the aurora was sufficient to produce a shadow upon a white wall, and to enable me to ascertain the hour by my watch. Several me- teors were seen; one of these, at nearly fifteen minutes before ten o'clock, had almost the brilliancy and apparent magnitude of Ju- piter. It passed from towards the north to the west. The dura- tion of its course did not much exceed a second, and it left a train of reddish-coloured sparks, the length of which appeared to be equal to one half of the space passed over. Although I listened attentively, I heard no explosion. The state of the thermometer for the preceding day was, max. = 52°, min. = 44°. For the 18th, max.= 514°, min. = 34°. The depression in the temperature took place after the appearance of the aurora, for at ten o’clock that night the thermometer stood at 42°. I am, yours, &c. Collumpton, Devon, Feb. 3, 1836. N.S. HeInexen. [We have annexed to the notice of a paper by Mr. Christie in our report of the proceedings of the Royal Society, at p. 413 of the present Number, references to other communications relative to this aurora.—EpIr. ] LIEUT. LECOUNT’S REPLY TO MR. BARLOW. We have received a letter from Lieut, Lecount, informing us that he has published a pamphlet in reply to Mr. Barlow’s letter in our last Number, p. 291. He states the following as the points at issue be- tween them ; and our readers will have an opportunity of judging how far he has succeeded, by a perusal of his reply, which is advertised on the wrapper of our present Number. “ Mr. Barlow has called an ellipse, which vanishes with respect to depth at one end, a fishbellied rail ; and has asserted that it deflects 4, when a parallel rail deflects 3. I have shown that it is the parallel rail which deflects 4, while the fishbelly only deflects 3. “« Mr. Barlow asserts 10 tons to be the longitudinal extension of iron. I assert that his own experiments only show 9 tons. 440 Intelligence and Miscellaneous Articles. «¢ Mr. Barlow asserts the neutral axis in rectangular bars to be as 1 to 4. I assert that with his own formula and his own experi- ments it is as 1 to 10.—Mr. Barlow in another mode of calcula- ting it for railway-bars gives it as 1 to 9. I say that his own experi- ments and his own formule show that it is as 9 to 1. «« Mr. Barlow assigns 7 tons as the strength of certain rails. I say his own formule will only give half that strength. “« Mr. Barlow asserts that the deflection of a rail is the same at all velocities of the engines. I assert that it is not.” BOTANICAL SOCIETY OF EDINBURGH. We rejoice to observe that a Botanical Society has been established in Edinburgh. At a meeting which took place on the 17th of March, the Society was constituted, under the title of ‘‘ The Botanical Society of Edinburgh,’—the meetings to be held on the second Thursday of every month, from November to July inclusive. Professor Graham has been elected President, and Drs. Greville and Balfour Vice-Presidents of the Society for the present year. The advancement of Botanical Science is the object of the Society. Its operations will for some time be confined principally to the hold- ing of periodical meetings, to correspondence, to the formation of an herbarium, and the interchange of specimens. The last is a new feature in the constitution of such a Society, and will be conducted by a committee, in accordance with certain rules embodied in the laws. The desiderata of botanists in all parts of the kingdom will be supplied, as far as possible, from the Society’s duplicates, and indi- viduals will secure the important advantage of exchanging the bota- nical productions of their respective districts for those of others more remotely situated. The benefits resulting to science, as well as to individuals, by this arrangement, will it is hoped be considerable ; es- pecially in regard to the Geographical Distribution of Plants in the British Islands and the formation of Local Floras. The Society, be- sides, contemplates an extension of this plan by promoting an ex- change of specimens with botanists in other parts of the world. The members will be divided into the following classes :—Resi- dent, Non-resident, Foreign, and Associate. Any person wishing to become a non-resident member must be recommended by two indi- viduals belonging to some scientific or literary Society, and pay a contribution of two guineas, which, without any additional payment, will entitle him, as long as he continues annually to send specimens to the Society, to a participation in the duplicates. To become a Foreign Member, it is necessary to transmit 500 specimens, including at least 100 species, or a botanical work of which the candidate is himself the author,—the former alternative, only, entitling him to a share of the Society’s duplicates. To continue to participate in these duplicates, he must afterwards contribute annually 300 specimens, including at least 50 species. The Flora of Edinburgh, which is particularly rich, will afford a Prof. Rigaud’s Inguiry relative to Dr. Pemberton. 441 constant supply of valuable dupiicates, and others will be regularly obtained from other parts of Scotland,—especially the rarer alpine species. Saacal Secretaries will be appointed in different parts of the king. dom. In the mean time all communications are to be addressed (post- age paid) to the Secretary, W. H. Campbell, Esq., Botanical Society, 21 Brown’s Square, Edinburgh. - INQUIRY RELATIVE TO DR. PEMBERTON’S TRANSLATION AND ILLUSTRATIONS OF NEWTON’S PRINCIPIA. BY PROFESSOR RIGAUD. the New Memoirs of Literature* for March, 1727, there is ad- velbised, as speedily to be published, “ Sir Isaac Newton’s Mathe- matical Principles of Natural- Philosophy, translated from the latest edition, with a Comment by H. Pemberton, M.D. F.R.S.” In this notice the author says, “ I having had a very particular opportunity of being fully informed of his real mind from his own mouth, do in- tend to proceed in my design with all expedition; wherein I shall present the public with such a translation of Sir Isaac Newton’s words as shall comprehend in the fullest manner I am able his true sense. And besides many other occasional remarks, I shall illus- trate at large the meaning of the difficult passages by explanatory notes, and shall demonstrate in form those numerous corollaries and scholiums which he, for brevity, has set down without proof.” The work is specifically mentioned as intended “ for the use of mathe- matical readers,” to distinguish it from the popular “ View of Sir Isaac Newton’s Philosophy,” which Pemberton then had in the press. This came out in 1728, with a preface containing many cu- rious particulars respecting Newton, towards the end of which it is said, ““ As many alterations were made in the last edition of the Principia, so there would have been many more if there had been a sufficient time. But whatever of this kind may be thought wanting I shall endeavour to supply in my Comment on that book. I had rea- son to believe he expected such a thing from me, and I intended to have published it in his lifetime. .... This Comment I shall forth. with put to press, joined to an English translation of his Prin which I have had some time by me.” Dr. Pemberton died in March, 1771, and in the same year his Course of Chemistry was published, by his old friend Dr. James Wilson. The editor prefixed a biographical preface, from which we learn that Motte’s Translation of the Principia, which came out in 1729, put astop to Dr. Pemberton’s intention. Indeed, he expressed in his advertisement the fear of being, in this manner, anticipated in his design, and it is to be regretted that his fears were realized. It is best, certainly, when the reader is able, for him to study the original, and to a mathematician there is no great difficulty in ma- thematical Latin ; but even if a complete edition in English, exe- cuted in a manner worthy of such a work, be not considered as a desideratum in British literature, a comment like Pemberton’s must * Vol. v. p. 239, cipia 442 Intelligence and Miscellaneous Articles. in all probability have contained much that was valuable. In the Abridgement * of the Philosophical Transactions Dr. Hutton has given an account of Pemberton, and says that “ after his death many valuable pieces were found among his papers.” In the enumeration of them we find “A Comment on an English Translation of the Principia.” This appears to describe the work in question ; but al- though the account is almost wholly taken from Dr. Wilson’s Me- moir, the original does not express the fact quite so strongly ; it only says +, “ The Doctor advertized he would publish a Comment on an English Translation of the Principia, and I find in his copy a reat number of papers written for that purpose.” This seems to in- dicate that the Comment had not been completely arranged ; but at the same time it gives every reason to conclude that materials for it had been collected. It is not impossible that the manuscripts may yet be in existence ; and if they are, the best way of bringing them to light appears to be by recalling the attention of the scientific world to the circumstance. Dr. Pemberton’s will was executed August 7, 1769, in it he be- queaths his printed books to Dr. Wilson ; but his papers must have been included in the residue of his property, all of which he left to Mr. Henry Miles, whom he describes as a timber-merchant at Ro- therhithe{. This gentleman married Dr.Pemberton’s niece, by whom he had “two sons, both of age and in perfect health and strength §,” [1771.] If any readers of the Philosophical Magazine should be ac- uainted with their descendants something might probably be learned. from them. It is well known that Dr. Pemberton undertook the publication of the third edition of the Principia. Newton entertained so high an opinion of his talents ‘‘that he even solicited Dr. Mead to prevail on him to assist him” in the work ||; and he was so well satisfied with the care which the editor took in the execution of his task, that, with his accustomed generosity, he nobly rewarded it. This engage- ment, Dr. Pemberton says **, “obliged me to be very frequently with him ; and as he lived at some distance from me, a great number of letters passed between us on this account.” It isnot likely that these letters should have been destroyed, and if they could be recovered they would form an important addition to our stock of scientific history. The correspondence with Cotes, during the publication of the second edition of the Principia, is preserved in Trinity College, Cambridge ++, and thus we should have the means of following New- ton’s progress to the completion of his stupendous work. P. R. * Vol.vi. p. 570. + Wilson’s Preface, ape + In Manning and Bray's History of Surrey, vol.ji. p. 235, Henry iles, Esq. is recorded as a subscriber in 1788 of 100/. to the charity-school at Rotherhithe. ° § Wilson, p. xxiv. || Zbid., p. xiii. q Ibid., p. xiv. ** Prefaee to View of Newton’s Philosophy. ++ Bishop Monk’s Life of Bentley, p. 180. Intelligence and Miscellaneous Articles. 443 ON SUBERIC ACID AND ITS COMBINATIONS. Examination of Cork.—M. Chevreul has given the name of suberine to cork freed from those substances which can be extracted from it by digestion in water, alcohol, and ether. ‘Bther digested upon cork acquires a pale yellow colour; this solu- tion affords by evaporation a substance which is deposited in small acicular crystals. This substance resembles a resin, and M. Boussin- gault has called it resin of cork. Nitric acid converts it into oxalic acid and a substance resembling wax, which M. Chevreul has deno- minated cerine. Resin of cork contains Carbon ...... 0°824 = 32 eqs. Hydrogen .... O-111 = 26 eqs. Oxygen...... 0°065 Suberine partially dissolves in the alkalies ; and the alkaline solu- tion affords a brown precipitate on the addition of an acid. The pre- cipitate is converted into suberic acid by treating it with nitric acid. That part of the suberine which does not dissolve in the alkalies, consists of lignin and a little resin. It appears most probable that it is the principle soluble in the al- kalies, which in the cork gives rise to the production of suberic acid : two facts tend to confirm this opinion, one that M. Chevreul has dis- covered, that the epidermis of the birch produces a large quantity of suberic acid; and the other, M. John has found that this epidermis is almost entirely soluble in solution of potash. The results of the analysis of suberic acid by M. Boussingault indi- cate nearly the same composition as already given by M. Bussy, viz. Anhydrous acid. Hydrated acid. Carbon .... 0°612 = 16 eqs. Carbon .... 0-557 = 16 eqs. Hydrogen .. 0:076 = 12 eqs, Hydrogen... 0°079 = 14 eqs. Oxygen.... 0°304 = 3 eqs. Oxygen.... 0°364= 4 eqs. Suberic ether may be prepared by heating a mixture of 4 parts of alcohol, 1 part of muriatic acid, and 2 parts of suberic acid. It is rather heavier than water, of a faint smell, and disagreeable taste. It is colourless, oleaginous, and boils at 450° Fahr. Its composition is Carbon ...... 0°627 = 24 eqs. Hydrogen.... 0:096 = 22 egs. Oxygen .... 0276 = 4 eqs. But C* H® O#= CH’ O3 + C’ H' + H2O. Thus suberic ether is subject to the general law which governs the composition of zthers of the same kind. By distilling suberic acid and lime at a moderate temperature, M. Boussingault has obtained, amongst other products, a volatile oil, which possesses the general properties of essential oils. Its odour is powerful and aromatic. When separated from the hydrocarburets with which it is mixed, it boils at 276°8° Fahr. ; it does not become solid at 18° Fahr., and affords by analysis, Carbon...... 0:766 = 14 eqs. Hydrogen.... 0°108 = 14 eqs. Oxygen...... 0126 = 1 eq. 444: Intelligence and Miscellaneous Articles. The specific gravity of its vapour ascertained by the method of M. Du- mas was found to be 4-392. The formula, C'° H'* O, compared to that of suberic acid, C'® H'* O+, presents a remarkable relation, showing that the essential oil obtained by the action of lime on suberic acid differs from the acid only in containing 3 eqs. less of oxygen: ac- cordingly when this oil is exposed to the air it becomes distinctly acid. When the essential oil is treated with nitric acid, violent action en- sues, and it is converted into suberic acid. It will now be seen that the volatile oil obtained from suberic acid presents a certain analogy to the essential oil of almonds, which MM. Liebig and Weehler consider as a hydruret of the radicle of benzoic acid. If we suppose the ra- dicle of suberic acid to be C'* H?2 O, then the volatile oil, the formula of whichis C6 H‘+ O, may be likewise represented by C'° H O+H?; in this case it will be a hydruret of suberyle. The production ofa body analogous to hydruret of suberyle by the mode described above is not easily explained. It only appears in a general manner, that under certain influences, an organic acid may be reduced at the ex- pense of its own elements, and may be modified in such a manner that the result of this modification shall be a less oxygenized body, approaching in its nature to the radicle of the acid.—L’ Institut, Jan. 27, 1836. PHLORIDZINE. MM. de Koninck and Stas have discovered a new organic substance in the barks of the apple, pear, and wild cherry, which they call phlo- ridzine, from ¢Aoos, bark, and 6.Za, root ; these chemists having ob- tained it from the cortical part of the root of these trees. When pure it is of a dead white colour, and commonly crystallized in silky needles ; it is very slightly soluble in water, but it increases in solubility by an increase of temperature, dissolving to any extent in water at 212°. Persulphate of iron colours its solution brown, and throws down a yellow precipitate, whilst the protosulphate does not act upon it. Phloridzine may be obtained by boiling the bark in water for 4 or 5 hours, and repeating the boiling for 2 hours. By leaving the solution in convenient vessels for about 36 hours, the phloridzine will be de- posited in brown crystals on the sides of the vessel. It may be ob- tained in larger quantity and in greater purity by digesting the bark with warm alcohol for 7 or 8 hours and distilling the alcohol; by standing for 24 hours the phloridzine will be deposited. Its compo- sition is stated at 14 eqs. of carbon, 9 of oxygen, and 18 of hydrogen. —L’ Institut, Feb. 3, 1836. THEBAIA, A NEW ALKALI IN OPIUM. M. Couerbe discovered this new substance in the solution from which the muriates of morphia and codeia had been separated by Gregory's process. It was separated by its discoverer in the following manner : the mother waters above mentioned were evaporated to the consistence of a syrup ; this contains bimeconate of lime, morphia, narceia, meconin, narcotina, and thebaia: muriatic acid is to be added, Intelligence and Miscellaneous Articles. 445 to separate a black fatty matter containing ulmic acid, which is removed by a skimmer from the surface of the liquid. To the solution thus purified, ammonia is to be added, which occasions a black deposit of morphia and thebaia. This precipitate is to be dried, powdered, and treated with boiling zther, in which the’thebaia, though only slightly soluble, dissolves. When the ether is separated by distillation, the thebaia is deposited in small reddish crystals, which are to be purified by boiling in alcohol with animal charcoal. It is then to be dissolved in ether, and by spontaneous evaporation crystals are obtained. Thebaia, thus prepared, is perfectly white, strongly alkaline, and soluble in alcohol and ether. In the first liquid it crystallizes, like the sugar of grapes, in small mammillated crystals, but in the second, in brilliant flat rhombic crystals: When heated to about 266° it fuses, and does not solidify till its temperature is reduced to 130° ; whereas narcotina fuses at 338° and solidifies at 266°. Codeia fuses at 302°, and meconin at 194°. By fusion, thebaia loses 4 per cent., or two equivalents of water. Concentrated acids convert it into a resinous substance, whereas when properly diluted, they combine and form crystallizable salts with it. By friction it becomes nega- tively electrical. It is composed, according to M. Couerbe, of Carbon ...... 71:976 = 25 equivalents (eis COB Dasam2ew 0 , Hydrogen.... 6460 = 27 do. ee Oxygen .... 15:279 M. Couerbe gives the following table of the colours produced by agitating the peculiar substances of opium in a bottle with sulphuric acid and air. Nitric acid oxidizes them so rapidly that the progress of the oxidation cannot be followed. The experiment is to be made in a four-ounce phial, with six grains of the substance, with nearly half an ounce of sulphuric acid containing nitric acid: strong agita- tion is to be employed. At first the colour is not very deep ; but it is developed in a few minutes. Thebaia is rendered instantly red, becoming deeper and deeper by time ; when examined in thin portions the colour has a yellowish tint. Narcotina, at first yellow, and remains so for seven or eight minutes, then becomes red. Codeia immediately becomes of a very pale green colour, which passes to a vert-russe after some time. Morphia becomes almost immediately of a green colour. Meconin, no immediate effect, but in 24 hours the mixture becomes of a superb rose colour, Narceia immediately becomes nearly of a mahogany colour. Whensulphuric acid, which contains no nitric acid, isemployed, then Thebaia gives a rose-colour, with a shade of yellow ; Narcotina, a blood red colour ; Codeia, a green colour ; Morphia, a brown colour ; Meconin, first a turmeric yellow and then red ; Narceia, a chocolate colour. 446 Intelligence and Miscellaneous Articles. M. Couerbe obtained from 40 pounds (French) of opium, the fol- lowing products : 1 ounce of meconin, 14 ounce of codeia, $ ounce of narceia, ] ounce of thebaia, 50 ounces of morphia. The narcotina, which remained in the marc, was not extracted.— Ann. de Ch. et de Ph., lix.136. NEW RENAL CALCULUS. There has been recently found in the kidney of a young girl 20 years old, who died of a calculous disorder, several calculi which pre- sent some remarkable particulars. The largest of these calculi weighed about 19 grs.; it was rounded, and covered with several ex- crescences resembling the mulberry calculus. Its composition offers an example not yet noticed of the association of oxalate and carbo- nate of lime, being composed, according to an analysis of M. Bour- chardat, of about 0:4 of oxalate of lime, 0°2 of carbonate of lime, and colouring matter, blood, and loss 0°4. A notable quantity of iron was detected in the organic portion of the calculus.—LE’ Institut, 24 Fev. 1836. SOLIDIFICATION OF CARBONIC ACID. M. Thilorier has read to the Academy of Sciences a memoir con- taining an account of the means by which he rendered carbonic acid solid; and he also gave some details respecting liquid carbonic acid. He finds the specific gravity of the liquid acid to be *83, water being 1-; it dissolves in all proportions in alcohol and ether : potassium decomposes it, but the common metals do not. A jet of carbonic acid, directed upon a spirit thermometer, caused it fall to 194°* below zero Fahr. The cold would have been still greater if the bulb of the thermometer could have been entirely covered by the jet. The solidification of carbonic acid was effected in the following manner: a jet of liquid carbonic acid was received in a glass vial ; the expansion which it undergoes is about 400 times its original volume, and by this so intense a cold is produced that one part of the carbonic acid congeals in a white powder and adheres to the glass. This powder exists for some minutes, and without any pressure. If the finger be placed on solid carbonic acid, the heat converts it into gas, the expansion of which repels the finger. A few grains of this powder, closed in a vessel, soon expelled the cork. Solid carbonic acid contains a little water, which is doubtless derived from the moisture of the air. In order, however, to remove all doubts, it would be necessary to get rid of the hygrometric moisture, both of the air and of the vessels, because it might be supposed that this * These are lower temperatures than have ever before been artificially produced, and lower also, we believe, than any which have yet been ob- served in nature.—Epir, Solidification of Carbonic Acid. 447 water facilitates the congelation of the acid, as is the case with chlorine. As to the temperature of this congelation, it was determined by using a spirit thermometer graduated to 187° below zero, to which about 44° must be added for the tube of the thermometer which could not be cooled, so that the cold observed was not less than 231°. These experiments were verified by commissioners, among whom were MM. Thenard and Dulong.—Journal de Chim. Med., tome ii. p.3. _ ARSENOVINIC ACID. M. Felix D’Arcet has found that when arsenic acid is made to act upon alcohol, a new acid, analogous to the sulphovinic and phospho- vinic‘acids, is formed. Arsenovinate of barytes is composed of Barium........ 27°20 Carbon........ 19°21 ; Hydrogen...... 3°33 ATSEHIG 3)... 20... 15:31 Oxzyeenye ss ....d- 34:95— 100° Arsenovinic acid is stated to be formed of Calculated. Experiment. cs Dees Oe ak 24°93 PAPO R, So eter Oe 4°47 PP ioe a4 38°91 O7 ........ 29°4—100° 31°69—100- Journ. de Chim. Med., tome ii. p. 11. METEOROLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS FOR MARCH 1836. Chiswick.—March 1. Cloudy: stormy. 2. Fine. 3. Showery. 4. Rain: windy at night. 5.Fine. 6. Rain. 7.Cloudy. 8.Rain. 9.Frosty: fine. 10. Hazy: drizzly. 11. Fine. 12. Stormy and wet. 13. Fine. 14. Stormy and wet. 15.Rain: stormy. 16.Very fine. 17. Cloudy and windy. 18,19.Hazy: fine. 20. Veryfine. 21.Slight haze. 22. Drizzly. 23, Hazy: slight rain: windy at night. 24. Fine. 25. Heavy rain: stormy showers. 26. Cold and windy: slight showers. 27. Frosty : fine. 28. Stormy and wet. 29. Clear and cold: rain. 30. Heavy rain. $1. Stormy showers : clear arid windy. Boston.—March 1. Cloudy: rain early a.M.: rainp.M. 2. Fine: rain p.m, $. Cloudy. 4.Foggy. 5.Fine: rain early a.m.:rainr.m. 6. Cloudy, 7. Fine. 8. Cloudy: rain early a.m. 9. Fine; rain early a.m. 10. Cloudy, 11, Cloudy: rain p.m. 12. Fine and stormy: raine.M. 13. Fine: rain p.m, 14, Stormy: rain early a.m. 15. Cloudy: rain early a.m.: rain A.M. 16. Fine. 17. Stormy : rain early a.m. 18, 19. Cloudy. 20. Fine. 21.Cloudy. 22.Fine: rainp.m. 23.Cloudy. 24. Fine: hail-storm p.m, 25.Rain. 26, Fine and stormy. 27.Fine. 28. Rain. 29. Stormy. 30.Cloudy: rain a.m. 91. Stormy: heavy squall with rain and snow a.M. * See note in the preceding page. er OfF-% ‘I 2%} of | wns G.0S | Z0F | &-Sh | 31-62 | $S9-8% | POP.0F | SPP-62 oP Li. | £0. Ost: “AVA “MS b-6P | €-ah | V-LP | 90-62 | 269-62 | 968-62 | 649-66} “1¢ “UT, a 1 QZ. os “IBA “AIS €-£5 | ah | BLP | 30-62 | P2P-62 | PPL-62 | 419-63} “of MN LE Ol. | Zl OfT- “MSA Z8P | 6-SE | €-ZP | Vo-6z | 009-62 | VEl-6e | 8PS-60| 66 “L or Lo. | PE. tr. ‘a G-SP | G9 | TOF | ZG-8% | SS9-8% | COT-6Z | G99-8% |- "8G “IN ge Le. “< -*s a8 | g-1f-| 9-6€ | P1-62 |. 128-62 | €L8-6z | 999-62] “Lo © Le OI. | ZO. Pro. “IBA “MS g-Lh | L:LE | 9.3P | OL-8% | PSz-6z | 1S-6% | 6€%-6| 9s 'g cv 0Z- Lo- Sol. “IVA ‘Ss | G. €.1¢ | €.17 | LLP | 08-82 | 086-82 | S61-6z | 886-80] “Sa “a C Lh “25h ELT. 0So. “IBA °S L:gb | $-6€ | 9-FP | Po-63 | £29.62 | 899-62 | PPS-6 | “Po “UL, SY £0. | g0- Lto. *s L-OG | &aP | &-8F | $z-6z | 19.62 | SSL-6z | O3L.60 | "fs “Mm 69 srehalt ZO: *" "8 £29 | agp | @0S | £€-62 | 916-62 | £F6-60 | 206-60] "3s “WL av "¥ Se . “MS o-Ps | Lov | a-8P | 9F-62 | L86-6z | 981-08 | ELT-0F | “1a “IW 60 wee “° “4 “MS . P49 | aLV | €-€9 | €9.6% | Z81-0€ | 9ZZ-0€ | Z81-0F 03 © LV ce ay < ‘ANG 9-19 | S-SP | 9-L¥ | LL-6% | oP1-0€ | 60-08 | SPZ-O€ | - “61 “sg LY ac ap *8 “MS P-6S | L-Lp | 3-29 | VL.6z | SO€-0€ | PoP-0€ | ZZE-0F | “st. “A ov Lo. | 10. 190. "IBA. *S z-zS | Lge | €-8h | Le-6z | 166-62-| SSz-0€ | 264-63} “Lr -uL @ LE FI- Go. ss “MS g.LP | €-SE-| PIF | €2-6z | 9EL-62 | LL1-60 | 789-62} “91 “A IV (ac 10- VPP. AIBA *AAS LoS | €-0F | 6-bP | Lo.gz | €90-62 | S6h-6c | 168-82 | “ST “L eV te. | LP. QOl- “IBA “MS 9.0¢ | zr | €-0$ | Lo.gz | P£z-6% | P9E-6e | 6F0.6| “FI “I ov £1: TI. Lio. "MS ¥.0S | z-6€ | O-€P | 11-62 | $09.62 | €L9-6% | ZIP-6z C1= © (a4 Ol. TI- ‘ “IBA *S 9-19 | S.10 | 9-LP | LL-9c | F8z-6z.| LLE-6% | CO1-6% ZleAS av “eceanleoiO. 2G0. “Ms Z-19 | G.ch | LLP | Lo-6z | 911-62.| 8E% 6% | 916-80] “It “A ge II- Lo. 690° ‘s a-Lh | aLe | gEP | PE-6z | S0z-6z | LIF-6% | 802.6% 0) oH Ay ve te 60- gg0- "s G.GP | €.£€ | P-8E | £1-6% | 80z-6.| 86F-6a | L8-60]- “6 “MM 6€ 90- Gl. ££0- “IVA ‘IN w-zP | Z-6E | €-0F | 00-62 | ZIP-6z | 81S-6% | ZOT-6 ae ds LE “< 10. a *ESa L.gb | P.9€ | ZF | 20.6z | 61F-6z.| SPE-6c | LPS-62 LA ov gI- to- O8i- “ING Pgh | L-LE | g-€P | 96.92 | 61-62 | SEE-6% | TB1-6% ‘9 Fe ay Z0- IZ: g£o- ‘s V.6r | €:20_| V-PP | 7o.6z | OSP-6z | 109-62 | PIE-6a Sia aN 1) ge vo. aLo. ‘s L.gv | P.0P | €-E0 | SE.6z | $0S-6z-| 17L-6% | 2E9-60 | “b “A IV vo: al. Ey. “5 Pgh | Lop | SSP | Lz.6z | 122-62 | L12-62 | LLV-6z °€. U7, -© LE 8z- | ZO- V6l- “ASS P.6P | 6-88 | Z-ZP | 76.92 | ZLP-6z | 8LS-6% | G8T-65 | “AN 9f 20-0 | ZZ. s “IVA 'S | oP | SE | 9-0F | £6.82 | 966-82 | 197-63 | £10-6% oe ee *“1yeq Jo saa13: Df \ie Tare orene “UTJAL | “XBYAL] “XBL “UAL “| V6 “ULL “xey “Wr *yo1e Page a Be Ae ushsoe tasty | -a08 “Com (Sguogl est. | dhe eons BGI ‘Supeysorgieg) T4et | WV ¥e “308 KOY Le ‘209 “hoy :puory : uopuo'y : uopuo’y uojsog| “YOTASIYD -o0g “KOy : WSpueT = uoysog OUAstyD :uopuo’yT “yuoyNT “gurod-soqy “ule *PUIAA *19}9WOULLIY, J, -1aja Woe Jo she] eee eee ‘u0jsog jo TIVAA “py fq pun SuopuorT anau ‘younsiyg yo Ayarsog yo.4nzjn2440F7 ay) fo Uapavyy ay) 10 NOSCIOH,L “yy &9 £ hunjauoag qunjsissp ayy hq hyoroog yohoy ay7 fo squaupundpy ayp jn apoue suorMasasgQ 20LG0]0K0a}2 TT 449 NEW LAW RELATING TO PERIODICAL PUBLICATIONS. The Newspaper Stamp and the Newspaper Postage compared. By Joun CrawrFurp, F.R.S. &c. &e. Reid, London. Mr. CRAWFURD has long since acquired distinction by his contributions to the knowledge of those countries in which he was resident. We have now to thank him as Journalists for calling the attention of the public to the prospects of those connected with periodical publications at the present crisis of their af- fairs, especially as the London newspapers have apparently been careful to con- ceal the frightful consequences which are to be entailed upon printers and pub- lishers. To Mr. Crawfurd, Mr. Wakley, and the Weekly Dispatch, we are indebted for all our knowledge of this astounding proposition, respecting which it does not appear, so far as we can learn, that any of the Printers and Publishers of the me- tropolis who are to incur these enormous risks have been consulted. The definitions of papers and pamphlets liable to the provisions of the Act are quite vague, soas to make it impossible for a Printer or Publisher to know whether or no he is incurring the under-mentioned risks and penalties. His whole pro- perty and personal liberty will be continually at the mercy of the officers of the Stamp Office, or of Police Magistrates, who may exercise an arbitrary discretion as to what publications are subject to the Act. Abstract of some of the Clauses affecting Journals, Printers, and Publishers, in the proposed Bill for the Consolidation of the Stamp Duties. 168.—Before a journal capable of being so construed to be a Newspaper can be printed, . an affidavit must be made at the Stamp Office, setting forth the title of the paper, in- tended printing-office and publishing-office, private residence and names of printers and publishers, and of other persons in any manner concerned in publishing such Newspaper, with the name of the proprietor, or two of the largest proprietors. Affidavits to be re- newed and amended jn certain cases, and whenever required by the Commissioners. 169.—Penalty for printing and publishing without making the above affidavits, One _ Hundred Pounds per day. By the same clause every vender is rendered liable to the same penalty for selling or delivering out any such journal, although ignorant that the affidavits may not have been made in the form required by the Act. Power is also given _ to the Commissioners of Stamps, to stop the issue of stamps until new affidavits have been made, whether necessary or not. In other words, the Commissioners are to be permitted to ruin any journal they please, by insisting upon new forms of affidavits, with which, from the absence of the proprietors or other causes, it may be impossible suddenly to comply. 170.—The affidavits to be evidence in an action at law against the printers, proprie - tors, or publishers, until new affidavits have been delivered that the parties have ceased to be connected with the publication; 450 New Law relating to Periodical Publications. 171.—Service of legal process at the place of abode mentioned in the affidavit, to be deemed a legal service. Personal service being dispensed with. 174.—Every printer, or publisher, in the United Kingdom, capable of being construed to come within the meaning of Clause 166 and schedule, is required to send two copies of his Paper, signed with his own hand, within three days of the date of publication, to the Stamp Office in London, Edinburgh, or Dublin, and between the hours of 10 and 3 ia the day. Publishers living in Cornwall or Northumberland, may petition for leave to send copies to a distributor of stamps within twenty or fifty miles, and may be refused at pleasure of Commissioners.—Every instance of neglect in forwarding copies within the appointed time, is to be visited with a penalty of One Hundred Pounds. The signed co- pies are to be evidence in a court of law for two years, against the parties. 175.—Besides the written signature and printed names of the printers and publisher, it is also to contain a ¢rue description of the house or building in which the same is actu- ally printed, and if that description differ in any respect from the description of the building in which the same was intended to be printed, as stated in the affidavit, for every such offence a penalty is inflicted of One Hundred Pounds. 176.—No printer can purchase stamps of a vendor of stamps, without first giving him a certificate that he (the purchaser) has fulfilled all the bonds and engagements required by the Act, and which certificate must be signed by the Commissioners. A vendor selling stamps to persons disqualified, will be fined Fifty Pounds for every offence, and the onus is to lie with the accused person to prove that he did not sell the stamps, ‘any law or usage to the contrary notwithstanding.’ 177,—Persons concerned shall, upon a bill being filed against them, be compelled to make discovery of their own guilt, and shall all be equally liable for the unpaid duty. , 178.—Any person having such paper in his possession shall be liable to a penalty of Twenty Pounds for every such paper, or to be imprisoned for a term of not less than one month, and not exceeding six months, 179.—Every person sending such paper abroad, to be liable to a penalty of One Hun- dred Pounds for every offence. 180.—A bill may be filed against any person, without distinction, who shall thereby be compelled to make any discovery in his power of the printer, publisher, or proprietor. 181.—Any person more than twenty-eight days in arrear of payment of advertisement duty shall be disqualified to receive stamped paper until the arrears are paid. 182.—Every pamphlet, or literary work containing advertisements, must be entered within six, and in some cases within ten, days at the Stamp Office, and the advertise- ment duty immediately paid, under a penalty of Twenty Pounds for every offence. Every person concerned in printing or publishing the paper is to be liable to the same penal- ties. : 183.—The printing-press and types employed in printing an unstamped paper will be liable to be seized, without any other warrant than this Act, whoever may claim to be the real proprietors of the property. By clause 239 every Justice of the Peace is required (no discretion being allowed) to grant upon the application of any Constable, Police Officer, or any Officer of Stamp Du- ties, a warrant to enter and search any house or place suspected to contain unstamped papers alleged to come within the meaning of Schedule A, or Persons concerned in them, or print- ing presses which may at any time have been employed in printing them. And the Officers are empowered to seize, not only those presses, but also all other presses and ‘printing materials found in the same house, (no matter to whom they belong) all of which are to be forfeited. - ‘By clause 241, Officers are permitted to break open doors and make forcible entry into priyate houses, shops, and offices, &c. - 248.—A Justice of the Peace may convict upon the evidence of one credible witness. The accused may appeal to the Quarter Sessions, but the cause cannot be moved by writ of Certiorari or otherwise, into any superior court. 249.—Any common informer, entitled to a pecuniary reward, in the event of conviction is to be admitted as a credible witness. ai) Also a convicted person may get absolved from his penalty, and even become himself entitled to a reward, if he procure the conyiction of any other offender. Tee te ral is } ma < Peay Cee MMM TE Shag s 9, 7, A ca Ct aes ae Lond & Edin Fal: Mag. Vor Fi. L7G, Forbes on the Mathematical Form VA iN AVIA Lendants opunizorm strengli’ of Marble (b) and Lorttand Stone (a) THE LONDON anp EDINBURGH PHILOSOPHICAL MAGAZINE AND JOURNAL OF SCIENCE. [THIRD SERIES. ]} JUNE 1836. LXXVI. On the Mathematical Form of the Gothic Pendent. By James D. Forses, Esq., F.R.S.L. & E., Professor of Natural Philosophy in the University of Edinburgh.* [With a Plate.] ard are few points in the history of science more cu- rious than the display of theoretical skill afforded by the masonic works of the darker ages. Wherever the Gothic architects derived their knowledge, it must have been both extensive and sound; and now that the stigma attached to the unfortunate appellation of Gothic has in a great measure passed away, and it is admitted that pure taste may be shown in following other than the Grecian models, we may be per- mitted to gather lessons from these remoter times, tending to show that the basis, at least, of what is pleasing in architec- ture is not of a capricious or ephemeral character, but reposes upon the immutable substratum of natural laws. When we select the best works which have characterized the middle ages, including both the Norman and the pointed styles,—but especially the latter, from its earliest introduction into Italy during the Imperial decline down to the sixteenth century,—we are sometimes at a loss to say whether the sound mechanical principles employed in such structures have been more happily displayed or artfully concealed. ‘To con- * Read before the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Feb. 1, 1836 ; and com- municated by the Author. Third Series. Vol. 8. No.49. June 1836. 2¥ 450 Prof. Forbes on the Mathematical fine ourselves to the Pointed style, we have a beautiful ac- cordance amongst the perpetually rising lines of a symmetri- calstructure. ‘These carry the eye from the base to the sum- mit of a building with a consciousness that such a general disposition of parts is conformable to the particular disposi- tion of details; we have a superposition of less solid upon more condensed parts, retreating buttresses and tapered pin- nacles. Then the peculiar form of the pointed arch, which, whilst it leads the eye upwards, has that in it which convinces us of its fitness to be loaded at the summit, and to bear in stately equipoise those spires or towers, which had their especial adaptation to the objects of the sacred edifices with which they were connected. The mutual support afforded by the parts was not only always adequate, but (in the best models) amply enough developed to prove to the eye that it was so. Pillars are placed where they might have been dispensed with, but they are never placed where the eye sees at once their inutility. Spandrels of arches are lightened, though the voussoirs might have sustained the load; open canopies with loaded vertices, though their lightness strikes the eye with a pleasing astonishment, are never suffered to inspire us with a dread of instability. Yet it often happens that the real sources of security in Gothic architecture have been as carefully kept out of sight, as that amount of protection required by the eye was se- cured*. We are perfectly capable of admiring the interior of a groined stone roof, without concerning ourselves much with the mode in which the lateral thrust is opposed. The vertical weight is that which chiefly affects our senses, and that the walls should appear, as well as be, strong enough to sustain it. Yet every carpenter knows that the lateral thrust of his roof must somehow or other be resisted. Much more so when stone is used, and arches which render the employ- ment of tie-beams impracticable. The Gothic architects from a very early period transferred the pressure to individual points of the vertical walls, (for instance, by the beautiful co- noical groining of King’s College Chapel, Cambridge,) and sustained the pressures by flying buttresses of the most ele- gant forms, which conveyed the thrust to the lateral solid but- tresses, surmounted by those elegant but ponderous pinnacles, which whilst they appear to be placed but for ornament, are in reality preventing the displacement of these stays, and thus * I find that Mr. Willis, in his interesting and elegant work on Italian Gothie Architecture, has expressed himself in almost the same terms that I have here used. orm of the Gothic Pendent. 451 conducing to the great end in view. The supports of the towers and spires of churches are in many cases quite different from those which the eye of the spectator is taught to consider as the real sources of stability. We might say truly of the Gothic architects, “ Ars est celare artem” ; but we have at present rather to do with the cases in which it is displayed. Though we are very far from thinking that the principles of taste are in all cases referrible to prin- ciples of reasoning, we believe that in a vast majority of cases they are so, and frequently to mechanical principles by no means obvious. The ¢act,—as distinguished from definite knowledge,—which experience conveys, is one of the most cu- rious of our faculties, and we are often astonished on disco- vering upon what remote analogies or reasoning our home- liest conclusions are founded. That there is a point beyond which mere logic is unavailable, and where its application would be absurd, few will] deny: but we must commence with the clear conception of a design to be answered, and means conspiring to the given end; nor must our superstructure be inconsistent with that design, nor opposed to, if it does not conspire with, those means. The more obvious conditions of stability must be fulfilled; and any ornament interfering with them is not only superfluous but displeasing. Every conspicuous part must have its apparent use: no portion must have a greater share of duty assigned to it than it ap- pears, as well as is, able to sustain.. Some of the architects of the middle ages delighted in constructing paradoxes in stone. ‘They violated the rules of good taste, because they violated the rules of common sense. Every one sees that he- lical pillars, if they be what they appear to be, are incapable of bearing a heavy load. Short dumpy pillars seem dispro- portioned to the chance of their flexure; very slender ones, unless most skilfully grouped, look as if a touch of the finger would bend them at the middle of their length. Orders of archi- tecture of increasing heaviness as we ascend, stone staircases which seem hung in air, and leaning towers (if we could con- ceive that it ever occurred to an architect to execute such a monstrosity), would be equal violations of the canons of taste and reason. On the other hand, the most moderately expe- rienced eye cannot look at a well-balanced building, what- ever may be its order of architecture, or at a well-trussed roof, however simple its materials, without a degree of con- scious satisfaction, of the cause of which we are for a mo- ment ignorant. ‘Though we do not pretend that the eye can detect by mere general experience the concordance between parts which the more refined mechanical problems present, 242 4.52 Prof. Forbes on the Mathematical such as the relation between the intrados and extrados of an arch, or the form of an equilibrated dome, yet it so happens that our consciousness of fitness and the accuracy of our theoretical views desert us nearly at the same moment, and that we are obliged to have recourse to that middle path which practical sagacity, long experience, and sound mechani- cal views point out. Professor Robison, in one of those admirable articles on applied science with which he enriched the Encyclopedia Britannica, and which remarkably exhibit the characteristics just mentioned, after an eloquent appeal on behalf of the dig- nity of roofs, has the following pertinent remarks. ** The Gothic architecture is, perhaps, entitled to the name of Rational Architecture, and its beauty is founded on the cha- racteristic distinction of our species. It deserves cultivation: not the pitiful, servile and unskilled copying of the monuments ; this will produce incongruities and absurdities equal to any that have crept into the Greek architecture: but let us ex- amine with attention the nice disposition of the groins and spandrels; let us study the tracery and knots, not as orna- ments, but as useful members; let us observe how they have made their walls like honeycombs, and admire their ingenuity as we pretend to admire the instinct infused by the great Architect into the bee*.” Having had occasion to consider some time ago what should be the form of a depending column of uniform material, such that the area of section should always be proportional to the weight sustained, I was led by an easy analysis to conclude, that it must be the solid generated by the revolution of the logarithmic curve round its axis. The mere imagination of such adepending body reminded me of the beautiful pen- dents of Gothic architecture, which, though we more fre- quently see them on a small than a large scale, have always ««* The Greeks were enabled to execute their colossal buildings only by using immense blocks of the hardest materials. The Norman mason could raise a building to the skies without using a stone which a labourer could not carry to the top on his back. Their architects studied the principles of equilibrium; and having attained a wonderful knowledge of it, they in- dulged themselves in exhibiting remarkable instances. We call this false taste, and say that the appearance of insecurity is the greatest fault. But this is owing to our habits: our thoughts may be said to run in a wooden train, and certain simple maxims of carpentry are familiar to our imagina- tion; and in the careful adherence to these consists the beauty and sym- metry of the Greek architecture. Had we been as much habituated to the equilibrium of pressure, this appareut insecurity would not haye met our eye: we would have perceived the strength, and we should have re- lished the ingenuity.’—Art. Roor, Encyclop. Britann., Third Edit., vol. xvi. p, 463; 10,9. Form of the Gothic Pendent. 453 conveyed to my mind a sense of peculiar elegance; and this notwithstanding that they occur only in the later periods of Gothic architecture, and are rather contemptuously passed over by the connoisseur as merely exaggerated bosses. I have not been able to discover either in practical or de- scriptive works any indication of the real figure of Gothic pendents. I am perfectly satisfied, however, that if they are not logarithmic spindles, they ought to be so. The gradual modification of the curve from the long finely tapered ex- tremity to the point of greatest curvature, and then the flat receding branch, corresponds to a multitude of Gothic details ; and an exact sketch from the best models I have been able to procure has led me to the same conclusion. It is not to be supposed that the architects could have had a curve in view which was not known until long after the termi- nation of the real Gothic zra; I conceive that it was merely a rude approximation to that figure’which might satisfy the eye by exhibiting some parity between the area of the co- hering surfaces and the mass to be sustained. When we come to reflect upon extreme cases, this supposition of the judge- ment exercised by the eye will not appear extravagant. A depending cylinder seems heavy at its lower part, because the area of section is disproportioned to the weight it has to sus- tain, and hence the upper part will appear weak and con- tracted; for, if the depending mass be loaded until the limits of cohesion are passed, rupture must take place there. Any body materially increasing inferiorly would be still more dis- pleasing. A uniform cone with the apex downwards will, I believe, strike every one as overloaded near its centre, and every figure having its concavity directed towards its axis would be still more disagreeable. The form, therefore, must be concave outwardly, and we may easily: imagine how the abstraction of matter from the middle of the depending cone, and the transfer of it towards its upper and lower extremities, might produce a curve similar to the logarithmic. This figure, in fact, embraces the essential part of what Professor Robison calls rational architecture,—sufficiency without re- dundancy: the section on which strength depends increases in proportion to the mass to be sustained. We may observe also that since the lower extremity should be indefinitely extended (the curve becoming asymptotic, ) the eye could not be satisfied by an abrupt termination; there is consequently always an inferior expansion which may seem to replace the asymptotic part of the spindle removed,-and without which the termination might appear abrupt. One characteristic of the Gothic architecture is unity of de- 454 Prof. Forbes on the Form of the Gothic Pendent. sign. We accordingly find the peculiar figure of the pen- dent carried into the minuter depending ornaments for the sake of symmetry; though the scale is almost too small to re- quire the curve of equal strength to satisfy the eye. It is quite obvious too, that to reverse the case we have described, and to make masses of the form of pendents resting on their smaller bases to sustain weights, is equally repugnant to the principles of good architecture and good sense. In all cases the strength actually given to pendents enor- mously exceeds that requisite for their cohesion. It appears from the following simple analysis that the modulus or sub- tangent of the logarithmic curve, must, in order exactly to prevent rupture, be equal to twice the modulus of cohesion of the substance in feet. « Required the figure of a depending body which shall be just within the limit of cohesion at every part of its length.” Let s* represent the area of its section corresponding to any point z in a given vertical ascending line. Since the condi- tion infers that the increase of section shall be in a constant ratio to the increased volume of the solid, med seus? gia (a being a constant) ; and integrating xz =a.hyp.log s? +c. If we assume the body to bea solid of revolution, and like- wise that the variable radius 7 shall become equal to unity when w = 0, we shall have for the corrected integral xv = 2a.hyp. log r. Hence the contour of the pendent will be a logarithmic curve, whose subtangent = 2a. Now, since it {is required that the increment of cohering surface shall be just capable of supporting the increment of Ss aa Tgp? 8% equal to the mo- dulus of cohesion of the substance employed expressed in linear measure. Consequently the subtangent is equal to twice the modulus of cohesion, and for a self-supported body of uniform thickness, the measure of the one and the other would be the same. In the cases of white marble and Portland stone the moduli of cohesion have been stated at 1542 and 945 feet respec- tively. The subtangents would, therefore, be 3084 and 1890 feet. We may thence calculate the logarithm of 2 upon those scales, or the vertical height in which the radius of the section doubles itself. This will be found to be 2138 feet in the case mass, we must have the quantity Prof. Ritchie on Electricity and Magnetism. 455 of white marble, and 1310 feet in that of Portland stone *. In a pendent x times the necessary strength 7 will be doubled in the vth part of the above intervals. Explanation of Plate IV. Fig. 1. Gothic Pendent. Fig. 2. Pendents of Uniform Strength: a, of Portland Stone; 4, of White Marble. Edinburgh, January 16, 1836. LXXVII. Experimental and Physical Researches in Electri- city and Magnetism. By the Rev. Witiiam Ritcute, LL.D., F.R.S., Professor of Natural Philosophy in the Royal Institution and in the University of London.t 1 AS soon as the magneto-electric spark and shock were obtained, it must have been observed that the size of the spark increased with the length of the coil employed, and afterwards diminished till it at length disappeared. The physiological effects are also exceedingly feeble with a short coil, and continue to increase by increasing the length of the wire long after the spark has attained its maximum bright- ness. In experimental research, and particularly in public lectures, it is very convenient to obtain both effects from the same magnet and revolving lifter. This is easily and expedi- tiously accomplished by the following arrangement, which will be understood by simply inspecting the annexed figure. AB is the hollow axis, C D the solid axis passing through the former, metallic contact being prevented by a cylinder of wood. B is the disc of copper or platina dipping into the mercury contained in the cell F, and G the star or point dipping into the cell H. ‘Two copper wires having their ends formed into a close spiral by rolling them round a thick wire are soldered to the hollowand solid axis at Band C. The revolving lifter of soft iron is considerably longer * If xo denote the logarithm of 2 upon the scale in question, and M the modulus of the common system, we shall have Whence these numbers are computed. + Communicated by the Author. 456 Prof. Ritchie’s Experimental and Physical than those commonly employed, and made of a tube of iron instead ofa solid mass. A continuous coil of eighty or a hun- dred yards, or even more according to the effect intended to be roduced, is rolled about one of the ends, whilst two or three coils of thirty, forty, or fifty yards long are rolled about the other end. The ends of the last are collected together and soldered to a thick wire which fits into the cylinder formed by the spiral, each end of the single coil being terminated by similar pieces. When brilliant phenomena of light are required, we fix a star of platina foil on the solid axis, and if we wish to double the effect we fix another similar star on the hollow axis, and con- nect the ends of the compound coil with the two axes by means of the spiral cylinder. If we wish to exhibit chemical or phy- siological effects we connect the continuous coil, or employ both coils as a continuous one. When the short coil is employed the light is exceedingly brilliant and the shock scarcely sensible; with the long coil the light is feeble, but the shock unpleasantly powerful, even without wetting the hands. The following simple addition to the revolving lifter will supersede the apparatus which I formerly described for de- tonating a mixture of oxygen and hydrogen by the magneto- electric spark*. DE is a thick copper or brass wire, about the size of a quill, and bent into the annexed form. It is screwed into the end of the brass axis so as to have good me- tallic contact. EP is a wire having a loop at E through which the wire passes, the other end resting on a small disc of copper connected with the wire W. T is a glass tube open at the lower end and closed at the other by a sound cork, or a piece of wood cemented in it. ‘The wire W dips into the interior compartment I of the cup for holding mercury. A small spiral spring is fixed on the wire a little above P in order to secure good contact with the disc of copper. When the lifter is made to revolve, the end of the wire is raised from the disc at every revolution, and a brilliant spark appears at the point P, which will detonate a mixture of oxygen and hydrogen in- troduced into the tube. Though these facts, which I have endeavoured to illustrate by an improved apparatus, are generally known, I am_ not aware that any theory has been proposed to account for the striking difference between the physical and the chemical or physiological effects. The undulatory theory of light is already established on so firm a basis, that we may employ it in the explanation of all * [See Lond. and Edinb. Phil. Mag., vol. iv. p. 105.—Eprv.] : Researches in Electricity and Magnetism. 457 phzenomena in which light is in any way evolved. It is univer- sally admitted that nothing passes from the permanent mag- net to the lifter when temporary magnetism is induced on the latter. It is also admitted that nothing passes from the lifter to its surrounding coil when voltae electricity is induced on the latter. The polarity of the electricity essentially belong- ing to the soft iron is rapidly changed by the change of poles in the soft iron horseshoe lifter. ‘The electricity thus thrown into a rapid vibratory state must derange the stable equili- brium of the electricity belonging to the coil of copper wire. Hence if this wire or the circuit be suddenly broken, which is the case when one of the points leaves the mercury, the rapid motion of the electricity at the point of separation must com- municate a corresponding rapid vibration to the electric fluid contained in the surrounding air, and consequently to the elec- tric fluid contained in the humours of the eye, retina, optic nerve, and brain, which will be followed by the sensation of light. The ‘appearance and indefinite continuance of the mag- neto-electric light, without deriving supply from any foreign source, thus affords a powerful argument in favour of the undulatory theory of light, whilst it appears to me an unan- swerable objection to the Newtonian doctrine. As long as the lifter is made to revolve, light of the same degree of brilliancy continues toemanate. We can conceive this motion continued for ever; so that the light, according to the New- tonian theory, lurking in a small copper wire and actually given out, would ultimately surpass all the light which has been given out by the sun since the creation of the world. For an infinite number of sparks, however minute, will constitute an infinite light; whereas the whole light given out by the sun since the creation is only a very limited quantity. Since gold-leaf placed in the circuit is deflagrated, and a fine platina wire heated red hot, these effects are obviously produced by the rapid vibration of the electricity or ether essentially be- longing to them. The metals then are obviously heated by their own heat, an unanswerable argument against the chemical theory of caloric. 2. In order to account for the production of the physical and physiological effects by wires of different lengths, we must take into view the striking difference between good and imperfect conductors of voltaic electricity. The metals not only con- duct much deter than liquids, but also convey the vibratory wave much quicker. In the case of a short conductor the whole electricity belonging to it has polarity induced on it in an indefinitely short period ; and also returns to its natural Third Series. Vol. 8. No. 49. June 1836. 22 458 Prof. Ritchie on Electricity and Magnetism. state with extreme rapidity. To produce a sensation the ex- citing cause must continue to act for a certain length of time depending on the delicacy of the organ. The eye being the most delicate is affected by a series of vibrations continuing during a very short period; and hence a comparatively short wire formed into a coil will exhibit light when the circuit is broken before any sensible shock is experienced. By continuing to lengthen the coil the series of vibrations will continue during a longer period, but they may not follow each other with sufficient rapidity to constitute light. When any part of the body is placed in the circuit when the metallic contact is broken, the electricity belonging to that part of the body is suddenly forced into a corresponding polar arrange- ment accompanied by that peculiar sensation termed a shock. Hence in the case of five or six feet of imperfectly conducting substances, such as the liquids of the body, a certain length of time must be required to allow the induction to take place. 3. If these views be correct, the electric fluid instead of being an imponderable agent possesses one of the essential properties of ponderable matter. When a body is put in motion it will communicate a portion of its motion to other matter, but not without Josimg a corresponding quantity of its own motion. Hence, agreeably to the experiments of Mr. Faraday, when the electricity of one wire is forced to induce electric polarity on that belonging to another wire, the mo- mentum of the first suffers a corresponding reduction. Again, the motion of the electricity of a wire towards a state of po- larity will continue after the inducing cause has been removed, thus exhibiting in another point of view the same property of ponderable matter, viz. the inertia of matter, or in this case its tendency to continue in motion after the impulse which first produced the motion has ceased. If these views be correct we have no right to expect that bodies at different temperatures, or differently electrified or magnetized, will have different weights, since in each of these states they contain exactly the same quantity of ponderable and improperly called imponderable matter. It is a well-known fact that we receive a more powerful - shock when electricity is being induced on the body than when the induced electricity is returning to its natural state. This is what might be expected from considering the energy and quantity of the exciting agents employed, these being either a powerful voltaic battery, or the immense quantity of electricity put in rapid motion in a large mass of soft iron. If these views be correct again, it is obvious that as we hear by means of vibrations, so we see by means of vibrations, we New Formula for solving the Problem of Interpolation. 459 are warmed by means of vibrations, and we receive an electric shock by the sudden vibrations excited in the elastic fluid essentially belonging to our own bodies. LXXVIII. On a New Formula for solving the Problem of Interpolation in a Manner applicable to Physical Investiga- tions. By M. Caucuy.* [NX the application of analysis to geometry, physics, and astronomy, the questions which present themselves for solution are of two kinds. First, it is required to find the general laws of the figures or the phenomena, that is, the general form of the equations which exist among the different variables: for instance, between the coordinates of curves and their surfaces; between the velocities, the times, and the spaces described by bodies in motion, &c.: secondly, to determine the numerical values of the arbitrary constant quantities which enter into the expression of these laws, that is, the values of the unknown coefficients contained in the equations. Among the variables we usually distinguish, as is well known, those which may vary independently of one another, and are there- fore called independent variables, from those which are de- rived from them by the resolution of the several equations, and which are named functions of the independent variables. Let us consider a particular function of the latter kind, and suppose that it is derived from the independent variables by means of an equation or formula which contains a certain number of coefficients. An equal number of observations or experiments, each of which will afford a particular value of the function answering to a particular system of values of the independent variables, will be sufficient to enable us to determine the numerical values of all these coefficients ; and, these values being determined, we may easily obtain such, new values of the function as will correspond with new systems of values of the independent variables, and thus solve that which is called the problem of interpolation. If, for example, the ordinate of a curve be expressed as a function of the abscissa by means of an equation containing three coefficients, it will be sufficient to know three points of the curve, that is to say, three particular values of the ordinate corresponding with three particular values of the abscissa, in order to determine the three coefficients. ‘When these are determined the curve may be easily traced by points, if we calculate the coordinates of so many points in the arcs of the curve lying between the given points, as we wish to ascertain. * Translated from a lithograph circulated by tke Author. 97,9 4 et 460 M. Cauchy on a New Formula for Thus, when viewed in its whole extent, the problem of in- terpolation consists in determining the coefficients or arbi- trary constants contained in the expression of the general laws of figures or phenomena, on the supposition that at least an equal number of points is given in the former or an equal number of observations or experiments made upon the latter. In a great number of questions these arbitrary constants enter only in the first degree into the equations containing them. This is precisely what happens when a function is capable of being developed in a converging series arranged according to the ascending or descending powers of an independent variable, or to the sines and cosines of the multiples of an arc. ‘Then the question is, to determine the coefficients of such of the terms of the series as cannot be disregarded without giving cause to fear that a sensible error in the values of the function may be the consequence. Among the small number of formulze that have been proposed for this purpose the most worthy of notice are,—that derived from the calculus of finite differences but applicable only when the different values of the indepen- dent variable are equi-different among themselves,—and that of Lagrange, which, whatever these values be, can be applied to series arranged according to the ascending powers of the independent variable. However, the latter formula itself be- comes more and more complicated in proportion as it is found desirable to retain a greater number of the terms of the series in which the function is developed; and what is still more annoying is, that the approximate values of the different orders corresponding with the different cases in which we should keep, first one term of the series, then two, then three, &c., are obtained by calculations almost independent of one another ; so that each new approximation, far from being ren- dered easier, is more tedious and laborious than those which precede. Struck with these inconveniences, and led by my investigations respecting the dispersion of light to turn my attention anew to the problem of interpolation, I have been so fortunate as to find for its solution a new formula, which, both in respect to the certainty of the results and the facility with which they are obtained, seems to me to possess such decided advantages over the others, that I have no doubt it will soon be generally employed by all persons devoted to the cultivation of the physical and the mathematical sciences. In order to give an idea of this formula, I suppose that a function of x represented by y is developed in a converging series arranged according to the ascending or descending powers of x, or according to the sines and cosines of the mul- tiples of an arc x, or, more generally, according to other func- solving the Problem of Interpolation. 461 tions of a which I shall represent by ¢ (a) =u x (x) = v, v(x) = w; so that we have (1.) y=au+bv+cw++...... where a,b,c... are constant coefficients. Now, the question is, 1st, how many terms of the second member of the equation (1.) are to be employed, in order to obtain a value of y so approximate that the difference be- tween it and the exact value may be very small, and capable of being compared with the errors to which the observations are liable; 2ndly, to determine in numbers the coefficients of the terms retained, or, in other words, to find the approxi- mate value just mentioned. The data of the problem consist of a sufficient number of values of y represented by Yio Yoo veveeeees Yn3 and corresponding with an equal number (7) of values of x Fepresented ‘by 7,,2,,...... Z,, and, consequently, with an equal number of values of each of the functions uw, v, w, ...... These several values of the functions I shall represent by Uy 9 Ug, seeeee U, for the function u; V,9 Uz 5. eeeeee, UV, for the function v; W 15 Woy seeeee Wy for the function w; &c. Thus we shall have for the solution of the problem, the num- ber (n) of equations of the first degree among the unknown coefficients a, b,c ...... (y= au.+ bu 4+ew + w.... (2.) Z Yo = BUly + DDy+ CWy+ cevece I e L Yn = AUgt Dg + C Wat cooces and if we put z to represent generally any one of the whole . numbers |, 2, ...... 2, these equations will all be comprised in the general formula (3.) Ye = AU; + DY; + CW; A cover. The first approximation will be made by neglecting the coefficients b,c, &c., or, what amounts to the same thing, by reducing the series, which the equation contains, to its first term. ‘Then the general approximate value of y will be (4.) Y= aw; and to determine the coefficient (a) we shall have the system of the equations (5.) Yy = Ay, Yo = Ay sevens Yn = Aty. The different values of a that can be deduced from the 462 M. Cauchy on a New Formula for equations (5.) would, whether considered separately or in combination with one another, be all precisely equal, if the particular values of y which we suppose to be furnished by observation were rigorously exact. But they are not so; for actual observation is inevitably liable to errors confined within certain limits, and this consideration renders it advisable so to combine the equations among themselves that, in the most unfavourable cases, the effect produced on the value of the coefficient a by the errors committed in respect to the values of ¥;5 Yos «+» Yay May be the least possible. Now the different combinations that can be made of the equations (5.) in order to derive from them a new equation of the first degree in re- ference to a, will all furnish values of a comprised in the ge- neral formula (6.) pal Ie 9, + Ka Yo + acvccvere EnYn Ke Uy + keg Ug + corcovece kyUly which we obtain by adding together the equation (5.), mem- ber by member, and multiplying them respectively by the con- stant factors /,, k,...k,. It is still further to be observed, that, as the value of a determined by the equation (6.) does not vary, while we cause the factors /,, /, ... &, to vary simulta- neously in the same ratio, it is clear that the greatest among these factors (the sign not being taken into account) may al- ways be considered as reduced to unity. Finally, let it be observed that if we represent by £19 Eq coveee Eng the errors committed in the observations and the values of Y\ > Yo +++ Yn Yespectively, the formula (6.) will furnish an ap- proximate value of a, the difference between which and the true value will be Teves tis es oe. boc epee (7-) ag ha It is now necessary to choose /,, /,, .-- #, such that, in the most unfavourable cases, the numerical value of the expression (7.) may be the least possible. Let us represent by Su; the sum of the several numerical values of w;, that is to say, what the polynomial + w, + w+ ceseseeee + %q becomes when we so dispose of each sign in it that each term will be positive. Let us represent by Se, not the sum of the numerical values Of ¢,, &95 €3 «+ én) but what the sum Sw, becomes when solving the Problem of Interpolation. 463 in it we substitute for each value of u; the corresponding value of <, If we reduce to +1 or to —1 each of the co- efficients /,, k,, ... k, by so choosing the signs that in the denominator of the fraction (7.) all the terms may be positive, this fraction will be reduced to Se. Su;’ and it will afford a numerical value, at most, equal to the ratio Sa if we represent by the sum of the numerical values of é or, in other words, that of S<; in the case which is least favourable. On the other hand, by assigning to h,, k, ... Irn unequal values the greatest of which (the signs not being taken into account) may be unity, we shall obtain for the denominator the fraction (7.) a quantity whose numerical value will evi- dently be lower than Swz;, while that of the numerator may ascend even to the limit 3: and this will actually happen if the errors ¢;, £5 +++ & be all of no amount, except that one which is multiplied by a factor equal (the sign being disre- garded) to unity. Hence it follows that the greatest error to be apprehended in respect to the value of a determined by means of the formula (6.) will be the least possible if we put generally eco choosing the signs in such a manner that, in the polynomial, Ke, ty, + ig tty + veveee + ky Up, all the terms may be positive. Then the formula (6.) will give Sy (9.) lier S u; ; (Sy; being what the sum Su; becomes when in it we substi- tute for each value of wu; the corresponding value of y,,) and the equation (4.) will become (10.) a u Su; Sys If, as an abbreviation, we put (11..) @ = ce » we shall have (12.) yre Sy. If we supposed generally « = 1, the equation (4.) reduced to y = 0 would indicate that the value of y is constant ; and as we should then have u 2£>a Su; l F ] = >, the formula (12.) would give y = a Sy. 464 M. Cauchy on a New Formula for We should then take as the approximate value of y the arithmetical mean between the observed values; and the greatest error to be apprehended would be less for this than for any other approximate value. This property of arithmetical means, together with the facility with which they are calculated, com- pletely justifies the preference usually given to them in the valuation of those arbitrary constants which can be determined directly by observation. Let Ay be now what is wanting to complete the approxi- mate value of y furnished by the equation (12.), so that we have (13.), y=a8y,t+ Ay. Let us also put (14.) v=aSu,+ Av, w= «Su; + Aw, &e. ... we shall derive from the formula (3.) (15.) Sy, = aSu;+bS8v, + ¢Sw,, Xe... then from this last multiplied by « and subtracted from the equation (1.), we obtain (16.) Ay=bAv+cAw + &e.... Moreover, let us represent by «;, Ay;, Av;, Aw; what the values of a, Ay, Av, Aw, deduced from the equations (11.), (13.), and (14.), become when for 2 we substitute x;, 7 being one of the integers 1. 2...”. Ifthe values of Ay,, A yo --AYis are very small, and capable of being compared with the inevi- table errors of the observations, it will be useless to proceed to a second approximation, and we may rest satisfied with the approximate value of y afforded by the equation (12.). If the contrary takes place, it will be sufficient, in order to obtain a new approximation, if we do with the formula (16.) as in the first approximation we have done with the formula (1.). This being supposed, let us represent by S! A U; the sum of the numerical values of Av;, and by SAy;, S Aw; ..... Ke. the polynomials into which the sum S’ A a, is changed, when for each value of Av; we substitute the corresponding value of Ay; or of Aw; ...... « In fine, let Av ha a S'A 9; If we can without a sensible error disregard in the series the coefficient (c) of the third term and those of the following terms, we must take as the approximate value of Ay, solving the Problem of Interpolation. 465 (18.) NY, == BiG. Let A®y be the remainder of the second order which is re- quired to complete this approximate value, and let us there~ fore put (19.) Ay = BS'Ay, + Ary. Let us in like manner put (20.) Aw = BS' Aw; + A’w, &e. ... We shall derive successively from the formula (16.) (21.) Ay; = bAv,+ chw; + &e. ... (22.) SAy; = bS9’Av,;+ cS Aw,, &e. ». and from this last, multiplied by 6 and deducted from the equation (19.), we obtain (23.) Aty =cA?w +, &C. oe Let 6;, A®y;, A°w;...... be what the values of 6, A?y, A? w. derived from the equations (17.), (19.), and (20.), become when for x we substitute z;, i being one of the integers 1.2... 2. If the values of A? y,, A? y, ... A?y, be very small, and capa ble of being compared with the errors incident to the obser- vations, it will be useless to proceed to a new approximation, and we may be contented with the approximate value of Ay furnished by the equation (18.). If it happen otherwise we shall obtain a third approximation by operating upon the formula (23.) as we have done in the first approximation on the formula (1.). By continuing this process we shall obtain the following rule. The unknown quantity y, a function of the variable quan- tity x, being supposed capable of being developed in a con- verging series aw+buv+cewt. in which w, v, w represent given Fanelians ea the same variable, if we know x particular values of y corresponding with par- ticular values (7,, v5, v3,.-. ,) of x: if moreover we represent by 7 any one of the whole numbers 1,2, 3.00,” and by ¥;; 2%, V;-+» what y, u, v, ... become when for z we substitute x;; then, in order to obesin a sufficient approximation to the general value of y, we shall first determine the coefficient « by. means of the formula (II.) u=aSu;, (in which S uw, represents the sum of the numerical values of u,;,) and the difference of the first order Ay by means of the formula (IIT.) y=aSyt+ Ay. If the particular values of A y represented by 4 my » AYy oe Third Series. Vol. 8. No. 49. June 1836. 466 M. Cauchy on a New Formula for Ay, can be compared with the errors of observation, we may disregard A y and reduce the approximate value of y to aSy;. In the contrary case we shall determine 6 by means of the formule (IV.) v=aSv,+ Av Av=BS'Azy,, (S'A v; being the sum of the numerical values of A v;,) and the difference of the second order (A* y) by means of the formula (V.) Ay=BS'Ay + A*y. If the particular values of A?y represented by A*®y,, A? Yo» . A*y, may be set off against the errors of observation, we shall be able to neglect A*y, and therefore to reduce the ap- proximate value of y toa Sy; + CS’ A y;; but if they can- not, we shall determine y by means of the formule (VI.) w=aSv;,+ Aw, Aw= BS Aw, + A®w, A?w = y S! A’ w;. (S" A?w,; being the sum of the numerical values of A? w;,) and the difference of the third order (A® y) by means of the formula (VII.) A?y = yS" A®y; + A®y, &c. Thus, in short, by supposing the coefficients «, 6, y ... de- termined by the system of the equations (II.), (IV.), (VI. \ &e. we shall calculate the several orders of differences represented by Ay, A? y, A°y...... or, rather, their particular values cor- responding with the values (7, 7, 73...) of the variable z, until we arrive at a difference the particular values of which may be set off against the unavoidable errors of observation. Then it will be sufficient to represent as zero the value of this difference deduced from the system of the equations (III.), (V.), (VII.)... in order to obtain a sufficient approximation to the general value of y. This general value will be then y=aS8y;,, or y= aSy,+ BS Ay;... &e. according as we shall be able, without a sensible error, to re- duce the series (I.) to its first term or its first two terms, &c. Now, if we call the number of terms retained m, the problem of interpolation will be resolved by the formula (VIIL) y= aSy,+ BS’ Ay; + yS" A’y; + &e., the second member being continued to the term which con- tains A"—1y;. It is necessary to observe, that from the formule (II.), (III.), (1V.), (V.), (VI.) (VIL.) ... we derive not only solving the Problem of Interpolation. 467 (1X.) Sa; => 15 SB; = UV; S' B; => hs Sy: = Vs Sy: =U; S’ %= its SEC), but also (X.) SAv,= 0; SAw,; =v; § A? w;= 0; S'A* vw; = v, &c., and (XL) SAy,=0; SA’*y; = 0; S A?y; = 0; S'Aty;= 0.., These latter formule are so many equations of condition which must be satisfied by the particular values of a, 6, y... as well as by those of the several orders of differences of W, V, W... y; and hence it follows that in the calculation of these particular values we cannot commit an error of a single figure without being apprised of it by the bare fact of the equa- tion of condition ceasing to be verified. The advantages of the new formule of interpolation are the following: Ist. They are applied to the development by series, what- ever be the law according to which the different terms are deduced from one another, and whatever be the values, equi- different or not, of the independent variable. 2nd. The new formule are of very easy application, espe- cially when logarithms are employed in the calculation of the ratios @, 8, y ... and in that of the product of those ratios by the sums of the several values of the functions or their differ- ences. Then, in fact, all the operations are reduced to addi- tions and subtractions. 3rd. By means of these formulz the successive approxima- tions are made with a constantly increasing facility, as the se- veral orders of differences continually decrease. 4th. They allow us to introduce at once into the calcula- tion the numbers furnished by all the given observations, and thus to add to the exactness of the results by making a great number of experiments subservient to this object. 5th. They possess this advantage also, that, on every new approximation, the values which they furnish for the coeffi- cients a, b, ¢ are precisely those in which the greatest error to be apprehended is the least possible. 6th. Our formule: indicate of themselves the moment when the calculation ought to cease by then giving differences com- parable with the errors of observation. 7th. The quantities which they determine satisfy equations of condition which do not allow the least fault of calculation to be committed without being almost instantly perceived. In the new mathematical exercises there will be found nu- merous applications of the formule of interpolation. I shall here quote but one of them. Let / be the length of a luminous undulation relative to one $AQ 468 Sir David Brewster on the Colours of Natural Bodies. of the rays of the solar spectrum, and § the index of refrac- tion of this ray passing from the air-into another medium: it follows from the principles established in my memoir on the dispersion of light, that we may develop in a converging series (+) é according to the ascending powers of (+) ‘ and con- 0.” ; sequently ae, and §° according to the ascending powers erp) - Moreover, a very able observer, Fraunhofer, has de- termined, in respect to different substances, the indices of refraction of the rays for which the values of 7 in hundred- millionth parts of an inch, are 2541, 2425, 2175, 1943, 1789, 1585, 1451, and finds as the corresponding values of § relative to a cer- tain species of flint-glass, 1°626469; 1°628469; 1:633667; 1°640495; 1°646756; 1°658848; 1°669686: in which case the formula (VIII.) being then reduced to 2 4 6? = 2°6112351 —0:0256298 (4) +0:1081567 (4 Ye 0:0649226 etal +0°019115 ear oe: ai ; (+-) —0-002189 (—*) ; reproduces exactly, and without the slightest alteration, the preceding values of 6. September 1835. LXXIX. On the Colours of Natural Bodies. By Sir Davip Brewster, K.H. LL.D. F.R.S. Lond. V.P.R.S. Edin.* HERE are few of the applications of optical science so universally interesting as that which has for its object the explanation of the colours of natural bodies. Sir Isaac New- ton was the first person who ventured to refer to one general principle all the variety of colours which are found in nature ; and he maintained his opinions on this subject with a con- fidence in their accuracy which seems to have confounded his adversaries: For while his analysis of light, the most perfect of all his labours, exposed him to the most harassing contro- versies, his theory of natural colours, the least perfect of his speculations, was allowed to pass without examination or censure. | During the century which has elapsed since the death of * From the Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, an unim- portant paragraph being omitted. Sir David Brewster on the Colours of Natural Bodies. 469 Newton this theory has been generally received and admired: In our own day it has been ingeniously defended, and beauti- fully illustrated, by M. Biot; and, with few exceptions, it has been adopted by most of the distinguished philosophers of the present age. The author of this theory has presented it under the two following propositions, one of which states the general cause of the phznomena, and the other the particular constitution of natural bodies on which their colours depend. 1. “ Kvery body reflects the rays of its own colour more copiously than the rest, and from their excess or predomi- nance in the reflected light, has its colour. 2. “ The transparent parts of bodies, according to their se- veral sizes, reflect rays of one colour, and transmit those of another, on the same ground, that thin plates or bubbles do reflect or transmit those rays.” In estimating the truth of the theory which is contained in these two propositions, I do not intend to enter into any ex- amination of the postulates, facts, and reasonings, on which it is founded. The object of the following paper is to analyse one leading phenomenon of colour, and to apply this analysis as an experimentum crucis, in determining the true origin of all colours similarly produced. The colour which I have chosen for this purpose is the green colour of the vegetable world, and I have made this se- lection for the following reasons :— 1. The green colour of plants is the one most prevalent in nature. 2. It is the colour of which Sir Isaac Newton has most di- stinctly described the nature and composition. 3. Its true composition is almost identically the same in all the variety of plants in which it appears. Sir Isaac Newton has described this colour in the following manner :— “There may be good greens of the fourth order, but the purest are of the third. And of this order the green of all vegetables seems to be, partly by reason of the intenseness of their colours, and partly because, when they wither, some of them turn to a greenish-yellow, and others to a more perfect yellow or orange, or perhaps to red, passing first through all the aforesaid intermediate colours. Which changes seem to be effected by the exhaling of the moisture which may leave the tinging corpuscles more dense, and something augmented by the accretion of the oily and earthy part of that moisture. Now the green, without doubt, is of the same order with those colours into which it changeth, because the changes are gra- 470 Sir David Brewster on the Colours of Natural Bodies. dual, and those colours, though usually not very full, yet are often too full and lively to be of the fourth order.” Having thus determined that the green colour of vegetables must, according to this theory, be a green of the third order, we must inquire into its composition. Sir Isaac has himself stated, that the green of the third order “ is principally con- stituted of original green, but not without a mixture of some blue and yellow.” In point of fact, it consists of all the rays of the green space, with the least refrangible rays of the blue space, and the most refrangible rays of the yellow space, and it does not contain a single ray of zndigo or violet, nor a single ray of orange or red light. ‘This is its real composition, whether we deduce it from the theory of periodical colours, or obtain it by direct analysis with the prism. In order to discover the true composition of the green co- lour of plants, we may analyse the light which they reflect or transmit, but the best method is to extract the green colour- ing matter by means of alcohol, and to examine the action of the tingeing corpuscles when suspended in that fluid. For this purpose I have used the leaves of the common laurel, Prunus Lauro-cerasus, as a type of this class of colours. The leaves are torn into small shreds and put into absolute alcohol, and the fine green fluid which is thus obtained is either placed in a hollow prism with a large refracting angle, so as to ex- hibit its composition in its own spectrum, or the light trans- mitted through the fluid may be analysed by a fine prism, or the spectrum produced by such a prism may be viewed through a portion of the fluid bounded by parallel surfaces. By which- soever of these methods the experiment is made, we shall ob- serve a spectrum of the most beautiful kind. In place of see- ing the green space with a portion of dlwe on one side and yellow on the other, as the Newtonian theory would lead us to expect, we perceive a spectrum divided into several coloured bands of unequal breadths, and having their colours greatly changed by absorption. At a certain thickness of the green fluid there are three red bands. By increasing the thickness, the violet and blue spaces are absorbed, and the two inner red bands. An absorption then begins near the middle of the green space, and after de- stroying the more refrangible portion of that space, three bands are left; viz. one faint band of the extreme red, one band almost white, corresponding with the mest luminous spectrum, and one green band contiguous to the white one. In applying. this mode of examination to. the green co- lours of others plants, I have found them to have invariably the same composition. In the following list of plants of va- Sir David Brewster on the Colours of Natural Bodies. 471 rious characters, I have given those in which I have made the experiments with most care. [Excepting where it is otherwise mentioned, the green fluid was extracted from the leaves: White Lilac. Celastrus scandens. — Convolvulus. Viburnum Tinus. Tulip-Tree. Prunus Lusitanica. Mignionette. Aucuba Japonica. Common Pea. Juniperus communis. Daphne Cneorum. Camellia Japonica. Virginian Raspberry. _—_ The green berries of the White Jasmine. Convallaria multiflora. Thuja occidentalis. The green berries of the Arbutus Unedo. Asparagus officinalis. Hemerocallis flava. When the green fluid obtained from these plants has stood for three or four days, it loses its high green colour, and be- comes of an olive-green, which grows more and more of a brownish-yellow, till it becomes almost colourless. During these various changes, the specific action of the fluid upon the spectrum changes also; but neither the change of colour nor the change of action has any relation whatever to the effects of an increase or decrease of thickness in the tingeing corpus- cles, by which Sir Isaac Newton explains the changes which take place in the colour of leaves. When the fluid has be- come almost colourless like water, it still exercises a powerful action upon the middle of the ved space, and a faint, but still perceptible action, at two points of the green band. This curious fact may lead us to expect that transparent media may yet be discovered, which shall absorb different parts of the spectrum, while they themselves are perfectly colourless. This effect of course cannot take place unless the rays ab- sorbed compose white light. In the course of these experiments, I observed a very re- markable phenomenon, which at first sight appeared to be somewhat favourable to the Newtonian theory. In making a strong beam of the sun’s light pass through the green fluid, I was surprised to observe that its colour was a brilliant red, complementary to the green. By making the ray pass through greater thicknesses in succession, it became first orange and then yellow and yellowish-green, and it would undoubtedly have become blue, if it had been transmitted through a greater thickness of fluid. ‘This mode of producing a spectrum by reflexion from the particles of a fluid, exhibits the phano- menon of opalescence in a very interesting form. Had the green fluid shown the same colour at all thicknesses, or had 472 Sir David Brewster on the Colours of Natural Bodies. it absorbed only the red rays, the opalescent beam would have been red throughout the whole of its path: but as the different colours are absorbed in different proportions, and, in the pre- sent case, in the order of their refrangibility, excepting the blue and violet, the colour of the intromitted beam must vary from red to greenish-yellow, as these colours are successively taken out of it. The analysis of this experiment is very interesting, but as this is not the place to pursue it, I shall only remark, that I have observed the same phenomenon in various other fluids of different colours, that it occurs almost always in vegetable solutions, and almost never in chemical ones, or in coloured glasses; and that it is a phenomenon of opalescence or im- perfect transparency. One of the finest examples of it which I have met with may be seen by transmitting a strong pencil of solar light through certain cubes of bluish fluor-spar. The brilliant blue colour of the intromitted pencil is singularly beautiful. According to the Newtonian theory of colours, the green of plants is of the same order as the yellow and orange into which it is changed when it withers, in consequence of an in- creased density, or an enlargement of size in the tingeing cor- puscles. In order to put this opinion to the test of experi- ment, I extracted the yellow juice from the brilliant yellow leaves of the common laurel. This fluid becomes of a deep red at great thicknesses. It attacks the spectrum powerfully towards the extremity of the green space, a place where it is not touched by the green fluid. It then absorbs the yellow and violet, leaving a bright green, and converting the blue into violet. At greater thicknesses, the violet disappears, and the absorption advances gradually to the red. For the purpose of varying the experiment, I extracted the juice of the leaves of the privet, which become of a deep black violet when they wither, a colour which has not the most remote resemblance to any periodical tint. The fluid was a deep red colour, much deeper than that of the darkest port wine. It attacked the red part of the spectrum near the line B of Fraunhofer, at the same place that the green juice attacked it, leaving (wo red bands, the innermost of which vanished at an increased thickness. It then absorbed the violet and blue spaces generally; and having obliterated the middle of the green space, the absorption advanced to the orange rays at D. Now, in both these experiments, the action of the colouring matter of the decayed leaves is decidedly different from that of the green juice, and there is no appearance whatever of the Sir David Brewster on the Colours of Natural Bodies. 473 tints having any such relation as that which subsists between adjacent colours of the same order. From facts like these, which it is impossible to misinter- pret, we are entitled to conclude, that the green colour of plants, whether we examine it in its original verdure, or in its decaying tints, has no relation to the colours of thin plates. I have submitted to the same mode of examination nearly one hundred and fifty coloured media, consisting of fluids ex- tracted from the petals, the leaves, the seeds, and the rind of plants,—the different substances used in dyeing,—coloured glasses and minerals,—-coloured artificial salts,—and different coloured gases; and in all these cases I have obtained results which lead to the same conclusion. I have analysed, too, the blue colour of the sky, to which the Newtonian theory has been thought peculiarly applicable; but instead of finding it a blue of the first order, in which the extreme red and the ex- treme violet rays are deficient, while the rest of the spectrum was untouched, I found that it was defective in rays, adjacent to some of the fixed lines of Fraunhofer, and that the absorp- tive action of our atmosphere widened, as it were, these lines. Hence it is obvious, that there are elements in our atmosphere which exercise a specific action upon rays of definite refrangi- bility, and that this, in some of these rays, is identical with that which is exercised over them by the atmosphere of the sun. I have obtained analogous results in analysing the yellow, orange, red, and purple light, which is reflected from the clouds at sunset; but it is impossible to convey any correct idea of the composition of these colours, without a reference to the fixed lines of the spectrum, of which we at present possess no distinct nomenclature. I may mention, however, this general fact, that in the va- rious specific actions exercised upon light by solids, fluids, vapours, and gases, the points at which the spectrum is at- tacked are generally coincident with the deficient lines of Fraunhofer; and particularly with those which are common to the light of the sun, and that of some of the fixed stars. Hence it appears, that these rays or lines are weak parts of the spectrum, or the parts of white light which have the greatest affinity for those elements of matter, which, while they enter into the composition of sublunary bodies, exist also in the atmospheres of the central luminaries of other systems. From the preceding experiments, it is impossible to resist the conclusion, that the second and leading proposition of Newton’s theory of colours is incompatible with the actual phznomena; and we may demonstrate the incorrectness of the first proposition by simply stating the fact, that there are Third Series. Vol. 8. No. 49. June 1836. 3B 474 The Rev. J. H. Pratt on a Proposition red, yellow, green, and blue media, which are absolutely inca- pable of reflecting or transmitting certain definite rays of the same colour with themselves. The true cause of the colours of natural bodies may be thus stated: When light enters any body, and is either re- flected or transmitted to the eye, a certain portion of it, of various refrangibilities, is lost within the body; and the co- lour of the body, which evidently arises from the loss of part of the intromitted light, is that which is composed of all the rays which are not lost; or, what is the same thing, the co- lour of the body is that which, when combined with that of all the rays which are lost, compose the original light. Whether the lost rays are reflected, or detained by a specific affinity for the material atoms of the body, has not been ri- gorously demonstrated. In some cases of opalescence, they are either partly or wholly reflected ; but it seems almost cer- tain, that in all transparent bodies, and in that great variety of substances in which no reflected tints can be seen, the rays are detained by absorption*. LXXX. On the Proposition that a Function of § and \ can be developed in ONLY ONE Series of Laplace’s Coefficients ; the Function being supposed not to become infinite between the limits 0 and x of and o and 2% of |. By the Rev. J.H. Pratt, B.A.t pegs important proposition is, in fact, not proved, but assumed, by Laplace in the Mécanique Céleste, II. ii. § 12. Professor Airy pointed out this defect, and gave a proof of the proposition in the Cambridge Philosophical ‘Trans- actions: but this labours under the restriction of supposing the number of terms in the series finite. M. Poisson has con- sidered this among numerous other important questions in a paper in the Connoisance des Tems for 1829, and also in his Théorie Mathématique de la Chaleur, chap. viii. But I con- fess it appears to me that the proposition is not proved even in these places; though by a slight addition to the reasoning the objection to the proof may be removed. M. Poisson shows that if p = cosé cos @! + sin @ sin 6! cos (¥—w’), and also if (1—2e p + a®)-? = 14a P,+a°?P,+4+.... + 6 Pi vesweh then 1 2 . SANG et 3 ip. ‘ L(Y) = af 48a Pitot (28+ IP. + oo} SF (4, V') sin déldy’. 79) * The views on this subject of Sir John Herschel will be found in a paper by that philosopher in Lond. and Edinb, Phil. Mag., vol. iii. p. 401.—Ep1r. + Communicated by the Author. in the Mécanique Céleste. AT5 S pre F f He then says, that since ["/" . Pf (6, V’) sin 6! do! dy’ is of the form of Laplace’s coefficients, we may put it an pe Pee ia and hence f (4, ¥) = Yo + Y, + «oes je Vatrtee canes In the same manner we shall have FOV) = Vo + OV + ence + Y',4, the accents denoting that 4! and { are put for @ and y. i+] pt pee Hence Y;= —— JA ny . Pf (HV) sind dé’ dy by the above assumption, L284 1 fepte SIEM OY = Sf, . P,Y’; sin@'di'dy' by the nature of Laplace’s Coefficients. All so far is clear enough. But in order to show that (4, ~) cannot be developed in another series V,>+V,+ --. V; + --- he says, that if this were possible we should have eh aN x fin “Vien Ald al ; Va ff _P, V/ sind déldy by what has preceded ; and then easily deduces the result de- sired. But surely this is no less than begging the question, All we learn from it is that if we proceed to develop, as above, we shall arrive at a series of determinate terms; but it does not follow that another method of development cannot be discovered which would lead to another series. The following demonstration appears to be free from objection. In the formula (1.) we may evidently interchange # and #6, ) and ¥ since P, P,... P; ... are the same functions of 4, p and #,/. Hence from that formula we learn that the defi- nite integral of the product of any given function of 6 and ¥, and the function (1+3aP,+.... + (27+1)¢’P; + ....) siné does not vanish between the limits specified above. Now, suppose,f (4, ¥) can be expanded in the two distinct series Q) + Q, + eee + Qy eveee and Ro+R,+...... R; 4--.e: Then by hypothesis Q;—R, does not vanish; and conse- quently, st eae (1432P, bet dopaaarceds Sater) ial Py sh tesaee) sin 6 ( Q,—R,) dédy does not vanish. 3B2 47 Prof. Faraday on a supposed new 6 ® P2% . a ey - P; sin@ (Q;—R,) dd does not vanish, since all the other terms do vanish by the nature of Laplace’s Co- efficients. Again, (Qo— Ro) + (Q)—Ri)+ «-- +(Q:—R,) +. =O. Multiply by P; sin 4 and integrate ; then we have Mees (Q; — R,) P; sinddidy = 0: but we showed that this does not vanish if Q; and R, are different functions. Hence that hypothesis is not true, and therefore Q; = R, and the expansions of f (6, )) are identical. Caius College, Cambridge, Feb. 18, 1836. LXXXI. Ona supposed new Sulphate and Oxide of Antimony. By Micwaer Farapay, D.C.L., F.R.S., §c. §c. To the Editors of the Philosophical Magazine and Journal. GENTLEMEN, | my Experimental Researches, paragraphs 693. 694. 695. 696.*, have, in relation to antimony, described what I con- sidered to be a new sulphuret, and expressed my belief that a new and true protoxide existed consisting of single proportions, “but could not stop to ascertain this matter strictly by ana- lysis.” Professor Rose when in London informed me that Ber- zelius objected to my new sulphuret, and I was induced to make more accurate experiments on that point, which showed me my error, and accorded generally with what Rose had described to me. I intended to publish these results in the first electric paper which I might have to put forth; but my friend Mr. Solly has put into my hands a translation of Berzelius’s paper, and it is so clear and accurate as to the facts that 1 now pre- fer asking you to publish it, adding merely that my experi- ments quite agree with those described in it, as regards the sulphuret. With respect to the supposed chloride and oxide, I have not anywhere implied that I had made quantitative ex- periments on them. On Faraday’s supposed Sulphuret of Antimony and Oxide of Antimony : by J. J. BErzELivs.—From his “Jahresbericht,” No. 15. ‘«‘ Faraday has stated, that when sulphuret of antimony is beated with more metallic antimony, a new sulphuret of anti- mony is formed, which when in the fused state is distinguish- * See Lond. and Edinb. Phil. Mag., vol. v. p. 170.—Enprr. Sulphate and Oxide of Antimony. ATT able from the common sulphuret. According to a few expe- riments, this sulphuret of antimony is composed of Sb S, or one atom of each element. When this sulphuret is dissolved in muriatic acid, sulphuretted hydrogen is evolved, and al- though a little antimony is separated, yet there remains in solution a combination with chlorine Sb Cl, which when de- composed with carbonate of soda furnishes a new oxide. The mixing of this with the common oxide is said to have given rise to the contradictory views of its composition, and also to the appearance that the fused oxide of antimony is decom- posed to a certain extent by the electric current only until the new oxide is reduced. “‘ Faraday appears convinced of the truth of this statement, but adds that he has not confirmed by analysis the composi- tion of this oxide, because he should thereby have interrupted the course of his main experiments. “This appeared to me to deserve a nearer investigation, as well for itself as for the importance of its influence on Fara- day’s electro-chemical views. I have therefore repeated the above-described experiments of Faraday on the three new combinations of antimony with sulphur, chlorine, and oxygen, and I have found that even if they do exist they cannot pos- sibly be formed by the means which he has described, and they are therefore still to be discovered. ‘The following is the substance of my examination. | mixed together very carefully and intimately sulphuret of an- timony and metallic antimony in the proportions that, through melting, the combination Sb+S must be formed: the mixture was then put into a glass tube; this was drawn out to a capil- lary end ; the air was then expelled by heat, and the tube was hermetically sealed. The tube was then placed in a vessel covered with sand, heated to a full red-heat, and then suffered to cool slowly. When the mass was taken out there was at the bottom a regulus, which contained 63 per cent. of the an- timony which had been added after it had been separated from some adhering portions of sulphuret of antimony by boiling with a little muriatic acid. *¢ This had all the properties of pure antimony. Rubbed to powder and boiled with muriatic acid, it still evolved how- ever a little sulphuretted hydrogen and gave some antimony to the acid. ‘The powder when thus boiled had lost 6} per cent. * From all this it is evident that though the resulting sul- phuret of antimony contained more antimony after than be- fore the process, it is not the combination which Faraday thought it was. Even in the cleavage it had not the appear- 478 Ona supposed new Sulphate and Oxide of Antimony. ance of a pure sulphuret of antimony. The upper portions had the same radiated structure as the common sulphuret of antimony, and a few larger crystals had shot up into the upper surface of the regulus, where they were surrounded with an irregular mass of a lighter colour. The upper and the lower portions of this so-formed antimony were each separately analysed, in such a manner that a weighed portion was put into muriatic acid and digested in it in the water-bath. The solution went on rapidly. From the lowermost portion cry- stals fell off one after another, upon which the acid did not act. The same happened likewise with the uppermost por- tion, only they were smaller and fewer in number. ‘These in- soluble parts when well boiled and washed were from the lowermost 15 and from the uppermost 10 per cent. It proved to be pure metallic antimony formed in feathery cry- stals, and shows, therefore, the interesting fact that sulphuret of antimony can dissolve at a high temperature 13} per cent. of metallic antimony, which when the solution is suffered to cool sufficiently slowly crystallizes out of the yet fluid sul- phuret of antimony before this latter solidifies. By a more rapid cooling the whole mass congeals together, and the cleav- age is then quite similar throughout. ‘¢ From what has been said it is quite evident that the mu- riatic acid takes up nothing but the common chloride of an- timony. Ihave examined this behaviour further in detail, and thereby found, that by this method neither with water nor alkali is it possible to obtain any other oxide. ‘* The above-mentioned experiment of Faraday, that melted oxide of antimony is decomposed by the electric current, clearly proves that the law proposed by him that similar quan- tities of electricity always evolve equal chemical proportions, only holds good so long as the comparison is made between combinations of proportional composition. ‘“‘ As for the cause of the appearance, that the decomposi- tion of the oxide of antimony becomes gradually weaker and weaker, and at last ceases, it is evident that Faraday has over- looked the circumstance that the oxide is decomposed into metal at the negative conductor and antimonious acid at the positive conductor, which then soon becomes encrusted with a solid substance, alter which the electricity could not have any further action.” ~ With respect to Berzelius’s objection in the last paragraph but one of his paper, I will ask you to reprint paragraph 821.* of my series. ‘* All these facts combine into, I think, an ir- resistible mass of evidence, proving the truth of the important * See Lond. and Edinb, Phil. Mag., vol. v. p. 344.—Ebrr. Mr. Nixon’s Table of observed Terrestrial Refractions. 479 proposition which I at first laid down, namely, that the che- mical power of a current of electricity is in direct proportion to the absolute quantity of electricity which passes. (377. 783.) They prove too that this is not merely true with one substance, as water, but generally with all electrolytic bodies ; and further that the results obtained with any one substance do not merely agree amongst themselves, but also with those obtained from other substances, the whole combining together into one series of definite electro-chemical actions.(505.) I do not mean to say that no exceptions will appear ; perhaps some may arise, espe- cially amongst substances existing only by weak affinity: but I do not expect that any will seriously disturb the result an- nounced. If, in the well-considered, well-examined, and I may surely say, well-ascertained doctrines of the definite nature of ordinary chemical affinity, such exceptions occur, as they do in abundance, yet without being allowed to disturb our minds as to the general conclusion, they ought also to be allowed, if they should present themselves at this the opening of a new view of electro-chemical action: not being held up as obstruc- tions to those who may be engaged in rendering that view more and more perfect, but laid aside for a while, in hopes that their perfect and consistent explanation will finally ap- pear.” With regard to my having overlooked the cause of the diminution and cessation of voltaic action on the oxide of antimony, I do not know how that can well be said, for Ber- zelius’s statement seems in parts to be almost a copy of the reasons I have given: see paragraph 801. of the Seventh Series of my Researches. My explanation is actually referred to in the account of the action on the oxide of antimony at para- graph 693., but by a misprint 802. has been stated instead of 801.* I am, Gentlemen, yours &c., M. Farapay. LXXXII. Table of observed Terrestrial Refractions. By Joun Nixon, Esq.t THE following table of mean refractions is founded on measurements obtained at 61 stations on 162 arcs, of various lengths from 1! 9" to 21! 48", amounting together to 17° 59’. The observations were made on 515 different days of the years 1821 to 1824, 1827 to 1833, and 1835. The average altitude above the level of the sea of the 162 arcs is 1730 feet. * This reference is correctly made in Lond. and Edinb. Phil. Mag,, vol. y. p. 170.—Epir. + Communicated by the Author. 480 Mr. Nixon’s Table of observed Terrestrial Refractions: Table of observed Refractions. 11 arcs from | \16' 36" to 2)’ 48” fi ose 29 — fi ps6 Perse 530 | 50 ares fi | Sum, 162 ares = 17°58! 59"; Refr, 3425” = EES The class A. forms itself naturally from the total deficiency of observations on arcs from 14! 1" to 16! 36". That marked B. consists of ares still large enough to mask those local irre- gularities of refraction, generally of a negative character, which begin to form an occasional but slight feature of the class C. The arcs marked D, subdivided at first into two classes of about the same number of arcs, were ranged together on account of the anomaly of the smaller arcs presenting a refraction of ;1,, whilst those of the other class, abounding in negative refractions, averaged no more than ;+3. Some of the more marked deviations from the mean value may, no doubt, be attributed in inconsiderable distances to the want of sufficient accuracy in the measurement of the height of the eye and pointing the telescope at the base of the signal, yet numerous recent observations have clearly indicated a modi- fication of the average refraction peculiar to the locality. As the ratio of the refraction to the contained are appears to increase with the arc, it is more than probable that the con- stant error of the sector, considered as — 20", has been esti- mated in defect. Let a,c be two arcs, of which c is (considerably) greater than a, and let a third are & equal their difference c—a. aie 1 : Admitting =, to denote the constant proportion of the refrac- , Abia : tion to the arc, then will = be the refraction for the arc a, and c A . . = that for the are c; that of the intermediate arc } being 1 Cc equa to ~ a . : ° a Supposing the instrument to give the ele- Mr. Blackwall on undescribed Species of Araneide. 481 vations in defect by an unknown constant quantity 2, the : ; a calculated refraction for the are a will be —~ -% and that See ; : - for the arc C, ple Hence the ¢rue refraction for the in- termediate arc 6 must equal the difference of these two quan tities, and the constant error of the instrument will be the excess of this proportion of the are c (or a) above the quantity previously calculated. The several values of the refraction in terms of the arc, and that of the error of the instrument, deduced from the applica- tion of the above formula to various combinations of the four classes of arcs, are subjoined. Ref. Error of er, Sector. I. By the difference of Band A... j1, —24/ ii. Cand A... 737 —23 II], -——_—_————- DandA... , -26 Iv, ———---——— DandB... zi5 —27. The true value of the mean refraction is most probably the average of the two first ratios, or ;1.,, and that of the in- strumental error 23}", or about 2" more than the quantity de- rived from actual measurement. (See Lond. and Edinb. Phil. Mag. for 1833, vol. ii. page 334.) Ilkley, April 27, 1836. Joun Nrxon. LXX XIII. Characters of some undescribedSpecies of Araneidz. By Joun Brackwatt, Esq., F.L.S., §c.* Tribe, Tuxsire_x, Latreille. Genus, Walckenaéria hi 7 galls - 1nl. Walckenaéria fuscipes, EPHALOTHORAX oval, convex and glossy, with a slight indentation in the medial line cf the posterior region; the anterior part, which is prominent and acute, is compressed and deeply indented on the sides, and has also a slight longitudinal indentation above: in front it is divided into two segments by a transverse groove. Mandibles conical, armed with teeth on the inner surface, and inclined towards the pectus, which is broad and heart-shaped. Legs moderately robust; the anterior and posterior pairs, which are the longest, are equal in length, and the third pair is the shortest. ‘These parts, with the maxille and lip, are of a brown colour ; palpi brown, the fourth and fifth joints being much the darkest ; the fourth joint terminates in two apophyses ; one, which is large, depressed, and hairy externally, overlaps the base of the fifth joint; the other, which is small, projects on the inner side; the fifth joint is oval, convex and hairy ex- ternally, concave within, comprising the palpal organs; they are highly * Communicated by the Author. Third Series. Vol. 8. No. 49. June 1836. 3C 482 Mr. Blackwall on undescribed Species of Araneide. developed, not very complex in structure, and are of a brown colour tinged with red. Eyes distributed in pairs on the anterior eminence of the cephalothorax; one pair is situated on the summit of its superior seg- ment, another on a small prominence on the upper part of the inferior segment, in front ; these eyes describe a narrow trapezoid whose shortest side is before; the third and fourth pairs are seated on the sides of the frontal eminence, and are geminated. Each tarsus is terminated by three, claws ; the two upper ones are pectinated, and the lower one is inflected near its base. Abdomen oval, convex above, projecting over the base of the cephalothorax ; it is thinly covered with hair, glossy, and of a brownish black colour. The plates of the spiracles are pale yellow. Length, from the anterior part of the cephalothorax to the extremity of the abdomen, ,th of an inch; length of the cephalothorax ,; breadth s+; breadth of the abdomen ;*,; length of an anterior leg +4; length of a leg of the third pair +4. I found this spider in March 1835, at Oakland, under stones; but ob- tained specimens of males only. ‘ Walckenaéria depressa. Cephalothorax of a short oval form, convex, prominent, but obtuse, before, where the eyes are situated, depressed in the posterior region, without any indentation in the medial line. Mandibles moderately strong, - concave, and slightly inclined towards the pectus, which is broad and heart-shaped. The anterior and posterior pairs of legs, which are the longest, are equal in length, and the third pair is the shortest. These parts, with the maxille and lip, are of a deep brown colour, the cephalo- thorax, pectus, and lip being much the darkest. Each tarsus is terminated by three claws; the two superior ones are curved and pectinated, and the inferior one is inflected near its base. The third and fourth joints of the palpi are short; the latter is the larger, and has two strong apophyses in front, the outer one of which is the more prominent: the fifth joint is oval, convex and hairy externally, ccricave within, comprising the palpal organs ; they are highly developed, complicated in structure, with a curved, spiny process at the extremity, and are of a deep red-brown colour. Abdomen oval, somewhat depressed, pointed at the spinners, and projects over the base of the cephalothorax; it is thinly covered with hair, glossy, and brownish black. Plates of the spiracles deep brown. Aged individuals have the legs of a dark red-brown colour. Length, from the anterior part of the cephalothorax to the extremity of the abdomen, +;th of an inch; length of the cephalothorax ,; breadth sz; breadth of the abdomen ~,; length of an anterior leg +-; length of a leg of the third pair +4. The specimens from which the description was made were taken under stones, in a wood at Oakland, in April 1835. Males alone were cap- tured. Walckenaéria obtusa. There is a striking resemblance between the male of this species and the male of Walckenaéria cuspidata* ; the following are the principal points of difference. The male of Walckenaéria obtusa is decidedly the larger, its pectus is more elongated, it has a slight indentation in the medial line of the posterior region of the cephalothorax, and has no acute, conical prominence situated within the trapezoid formed by the four intermediate * For the description of Walckenaéria cuspidata, see Lond. and Edinb. Phil. Mag., vol. iii. p. 108, Mr. Blackwall on undescribed Species of Araneide. 483 eyes. Its palpi also differ a little in organizaticn : the third joint is clavate ; the fourth is short, terminating in three apophyses, the largest of which curves outwards before the fifth joint; exterior to this occurs the next in size, having a small, pointed prominence at its base, in front; and the smallest is situated underneath: the fifth joint is somewhat oval, convex and hairy externally, concave within, comprising the palpal organs; they are highly developed, complicated in structure, with a strong spine on the outer side curved into a circular form, and are of a brownish black colour tinged with red. Length, from the anterior part of the cephalothorax to the extremity of the abdomen, +th of an inch; length of the cephalothorax +, ; breadth z'y; breadth of the abdomen +',; length of an anterior leg #,; length of a leg of the third pair 2. I found males of this species under stones at Oakland in February 1835, but I have not been so fortunate as to discover the female. Tribe, INEQUITEL”, Latreille. Genus, Theridion, Walckenaer. Theridion angulatum. Cephalothorax inversely heart-shaped, inclining to oval, convex, slightly hairy, prominent before, where the eyes are situated, with an inden- tation in the medial line of the postericr region ; its colour is pale yellow- brown, with a longitudinal band ef red-brown on each side, and a broader one of the same hue extending along the middle ; the margins are yellowish white. Eyes placed on black spots; four, which are intermediate, form a square nearly, the two in front being seated on a protuberance ; the other four are disposed in pairs on the sides of the square; the eyes con- stituting each pair are placed obliquely on an eminence, and are near together but not contiguous. Mandibles moderately strong, conical, and perpendicular; they are red-brown, with a spot of a darker hue in front, near the base of each. Maxillze enlarged externally, where the palpi are inserted, obliquely truncated on the outer side, at the extremity, and in- clined towards the lip, which is almost semicircular, being a little pointed at the apex. These organs, and the palpi, which are short, and are armed with a curved, pectinated claw at the extremity, are of a red-brown colour. Pectus of an oblong heart-shape and a dark red-brown hue. Legs yel- lowish-brown banded with red-brown; the first pair is the longest, then the fourth, the third pair being the shortest; the second and third pairs are disproportionally short. Each tarsus is terminated by three claws; the two superior ones are curved, and are slightly pectinated near the base, and the inferior one is inflected near its insertion. The abdomen, which is deeply notched in front, and projects over the base of the cephalotho- rax, has an angular appearance, occasioned by two, bold, lateral promi- nences, situated on the upper side, nearer to the posterior than the an- terior extremity; the superior surface, from the fore part to the lateral prominences, is of a deep red-brown colour, the margins being the darkest ; on each side of the medial line are two minute, yellowish white spots, forming a long narrow quadrangle; the posterior part is pale red-brown, a yellow transverse line connecting the two lateral prominences, from which proceed two obscure, angular bands that converge to the spinners ; the whole of the upper part has an irregular border of yellowish-white minutely freckled with red-brown; the sides and under part of the abdo- men are dark red-brown, with streaks and minute spots of a lighter shade. Plates of the spiracles yellow. Length, from the anterior part of the cephalothorax to the extremity of 3C2 484 Mr. Blackwall on undescribed Species of Araneidee. the abdomen, +th of an inch; length of the cephalcthorax :,; breadth a'y; breadth of the abdomen ;; length of an anterior leg +; length of a leg of the third pair 4. This spider, which, like Tetragnatha extensa, frequently extends the first and second pairs of legs forwards, and the third and fourth pairs back- wards, in a line with the body, was found in a cleft of a rail at Oakland, in the month of April, 1835. I have not yet seen the male. Theridion filipes. This remarkable species has the cephalothorax of an oval form; it is con- vex and glossy, with an indentation in the medial line of the posterior re- gion. Mandibles powerful, conical, armed with teeth on the inner surface, rather divergent at the extremities, and inclined towards the pectus, which is heart-shaped. Maxillee enlarged at the base, where the palpi are in- serted, obliquely truncated on the outer side, at the extremity, and in- clined towards the lip, which is semicircular, and prominent at the apex. Legs and palpi long, slender, and furnished with hairs and some fine, erect spines. These parts are of a brown colour, the mandibles and maxillz having a tinge of red. Eyes disposed in two transverse rows on the fore part of the cephalothorax; the intermediate eyes of both rows form a trapezoid whose anterior side is considerably the shortest; the lateral ones are placed obliquely in pairs, each pair being seated on a small emi- nevice, and geminated ; the posterior eyes of the trapezoid are larger, and the anterior ones much smaller than the rest. Each tarsus is terminated by three claws ; the two superior ones are curved and slightly pectinated, and the inferior one is inflected near its base. The first pair of legs is the longest, then the fourth, the third pair being the shortest. Abdomen oval, convex above, projecting over the base of the cephalothorax; it is thinly covered with hair, glossy, and of a blackish brown colour, with a tinge of olive. A long, slender, cylindrical, semitransparent process, directed back- wards, is in connexion with the sexual organs. Plates of the spiracles of a deep, dull brown colour. Some specimens have a series of faint, pale, an- gular lines, whose vertices are directed forwards, extending along the mid- dle of the upper part of the abdomen. Length, from the anterior part of the cephalothorax to the extremity of the abdomen, 3th of an inch; length of the cephalothorax 5; breadth 23 breadth of the abdomen +',; length of an anterior leg 2%, ; length of a leg of the third pair -3,. The male is rather smaller and darker coloured than the female, but the relative length of its legs is the same; their absolute length, however, is greater, an anterior one measuring }4ths of an inch. The third and fourth Joiuts of the palpi are short; the latter, which is the stronger, being pro- minent on the inner side and in front; with the frontal prominence se- veral long bristles are connected: the fifth joint is of a long, irregular oval form, having a projection on the outer side, and two smaller ones on the upper part, near its articulation with the fourth joint; it is convex and hairy externally, concave within, comprising the palpal organs, which are highly developed, complicated in structure, and of a red-brown colour; a strong, corneous spine, enveloped in a delicate, transparent membrane, originates in the upper part of these organs, and, bending downwards, ex- tends along their inner side a little beyond the termination of the fifth joint, being curved outwards at its extremity. This spider is allied to the Neriene by the disposition and relative size of the eyes, and to the Linyphie by the length and delicacy of its limbs ; indeed, on a superficial view, it bears a striking resemblance to Linyphia pusilla ; but the structure of the maxilla and the relative length of the Mr. Blackwall on undescribed Species of Araneide. 485 legs have induced me to class it with the Theridia. It occurs under stones in the woods at Oakland, where I captured specimens in March 1835. The first individual I examined under the microscope was a female, and it presented an anomaly in organization which I never before witnessed in this class of animals ; it had a supernumerary eye, situated between the two small ones constituting the anterior pair of the trapezoid. An in- stance of a deficiency of eyes in a female Thomisus cristatus has since fallen under my observation. This spider had the two lateral pairs only ; the two intermediate, or smaller pairs, were altogether wanting, not even the slightest rudiments being visible. Genus, Neriene, oT ‘ : mihi. Neriene rubripes, Cephalothorax oval, convex, glossy, with furrows on the sides diverging from the upper part to the margins, and an indentation in the medial line of the posterior region. Mandibles powerful, conical, convex in front, divergent at the lower extremities, armed with two rows of teeth on the inner surface, and slightly inclined towards the pectus, which is heart- shaped. Maxilla strong, and inclined towards the lip, which is semicir- cular and prominent at the apex. These parts are of a red-brown colour, the mandibles, lip, and margins of the pectus being the darkest. Legs mo- derately robust, provided with hairs and a few fine spines; the first pair is rather the longest, then the fourth, the third pair being the shortest. These organs and the palpi are of a red colour. Each tarsus has three claws at its extremity; the two superior ones are pectinated about two thirds of their length from the base, and the inferior one is inflected near its insertion, Eyes placed on black spots, and disposed as in the Neriene generally. Abdomen oval, convex above, projecting over the base of the cephalothorax ; it is thinly covered with hair, glossy, and brownish black. Plates of the spiracles pale yellow. A curved process of a red-brown colour is connected with the sexual organs. Some individuals have the abdomen of a yellowish-brown hue, and the other parts, generally, lighter- coloured. Length, from the anterior part of the cephalothorax to the extremity of the abdomen, .%,ths of an inch; length of the cephalothorax ~, ; breadth a's breadth of the abdomen ;',; length of an anterior leg +; length of aleg of the third pair ~,. The male is somewhat smaller and darker-coloured than the female, but its legs are longer, an anterior one measuring ~%ths of an inch. The maxille are remarkably convex externally immediately before the insertion of the palpi. The second joint of the palpi is curved towards the cepha- lothorax; the third and fourth joints are short, the latter being rather the larger: the fifth is oval, convex and hairy externally, concave within, com- prising the palpal organs, which are prominent, highly developed, complex in structure, and are of a dark red-brown colour. ‘The fifth or terminal joints of the palpi have their convex sides directed towards each other. This species was found at Oakland, under stones, in the autumn of 1834, by Mr. T. Blackwall. Neriene tibialis. This spider has the cephalothorax of an oval form; it is convex, glossy, prominent but obtuse before, where the eyes are situated, with an indenta- tion in the medial line of the posterior region. Mandibles moderately owerful, conical, armed with teeth on the inner surface, and somewhat inclined towards the pectus, which is heart-shaped. ‘These parts, with 486 Mr. Blackwall on undescribed Species of Araneide. the maxillz and lip, are of a brownish black colour. The anterior and posterior pairs of legs, which are the longest, are equal in length, and the third pair is the shortest. Each tarsus is terminated by three claws; the two superior ones are slightly pectinated, and the inferior one is inflected near its base. The tibize of the anterior pair of legs are disproporticnally strong, having the appearance of being swoln. The palpi are slender ; the third joint is long and clavate; the fourth is elongated before into a nar- row, oval process, hairy externally, which extends obliquely across the upper part of the fifth joint towards the inner side, but is terminated by a short, acute spine curved outwards: the fifth joint is oval, convex and hairy externally, concave within, comprising the palpal organs, which are highly developed and complicated in structure, having several corneous processes, one of which, on the outer side, at the extremity, is curved into a cireular form. Abdomen oval, convex above, projecting over the base of the cephalothorax ; it is thinly covered with hair, glossy, and of a brownish black colour. The plates of the spiracles are pale yellow. Length, from the anterior part of the cephalothorax to the extremity of the abdomen, ~-th of an inch; length of the cephalothorax »,; breadth 5; breadth of the abdomen ;!,; length of an anterior leg +; length of a jeg of the third pair 3. {In March 1835 I captured a few specimens of this species, all of which were males, under stones, at Oakland. Neriene livida. Cephalothorax oval, convex, glossy, with several furrows on the sides diverging from the middle to the margins, and an indentation in the medial line of the posterior region. Mandibles powerful, conical, convex in front, near the base, armed with a few small teeth on the inner surface, and rather inclined towards the pectus, which is heart-shaped. Maxillz strong, convex underneath, and inclined towards the lip, which is somewhat of a triangular form truncated at the apex. Legs and palpi robust, and fur- nished with hairs and fine spines. These parts are of a red-brown colour, the lip, maxilla, mandibles, and anterior part of the cephalothorax being the darkest. Each tarsus is terminated by three claws; the two superior ones are curved and deeply pectinated, and the inferior one is inflected near its base; the palpi have a curved, pectinated claw at the extremity. Abdomen oval, convex above, projecting over the base of the cephalotho- rax, and rather broader at the posterior than the anterior extremity ; it is thinly covered with hair, glossy, and of a yellowish-brown colour, with a tinge of black. Plates of the spiracles pale-yellow. ; Length, from the anterior part of the cephalothorax to the extremity of the abdomen, ith of an inch; length of the cephalothorax 5',; breadth ~'y; breadth of the abdomen yz; length of an anterior leg +; length of a leg of the third pair +. The male is smaller and darker coloured than the female, but the rela- tive length of its legs is the same. The second joint of the palpi is curved towards the cephalothorax; the third and fourth joints are short, the latter projecting two obtuse apophyses, the larger one situated on the outer and the smaller one on the inner side: the fifth joint is oval, convex and hairy externally, concave within, comprising the palpal organs, which are highly developed, complex in structure, and of a dark red-brown colour. This species is common on the under surface of stones in the neighbour- hood of Llanrwst. Neriene furva. The cephalothorax is of an oval figure; it is convex, glossy, with slight furrows on the sides, and an indentation in the medial line of the posterior Mr. Blackwall on undescribed Species of Araneidze. 487 region. Mandibles powerful, conical, vertical, convex in front, and armed with teeth on the inner surface. Maxille enlarged at the base, where the palpi are inserted, and inclined towards the lip, which is semicircular and prominent at the apex. Pectus heart-shaped. These parts are dark brown, with a slight tinge of red, the pectus, lip, and anterior part of the cepha- lothorax being the darkest. Legs and palpi robust, and of a red colour. Each tarsus is terminated by three claws; the two superior ones are pec- tinated about half their length from the base, and the inferior one is in- flected near its insertion. The third and fourth joints of the palpi are short, the former, which is considerably the stronger, being convex in front ; the latter projects two apophyses from its anterior extremity ; ene before, which terminates in a corneous point, and has a small, acute, corneous prominence on the inner side; the other underneath, which is provided with a corneous point on the outer side: the fifth joint is oval, convex and hairy externally, concave within, comprising the palpal organs; they are highly developed, complicated in structure, with a corneous process at the upper part curved outwards, and are of a dark red-brown colour. Ab- domen oval, convex above, projecting over the base of the cephalothorax ; it is thinly covered with hair, glossy, and of a brownish-black colour. Plates of the spiracles pale yellowish-white. Length, from the anterior part of the cephalothorax to the extremity of the abdomen 3th of an inch; length of the cephalothorax ;-; breadth 3, ; breadth of the abdomen -~, ; length of an anterior leg +; length of a leg of the third pair +. I found one male only of this species, under a fragment of rock in a wood at Oakland, in June 1835. Tribe, ORBITELE, i Genus, Linyphia, \ Latreille. Linyphia nigella. Cephaiothorax oval, convex, glossy, with an indentation in the medial line of the posterior region; it is of a dark brown colour approaching to black. Mandibles long, powerful, armed with teeth on the inner surface, divergent at the extremities, of a deep brown colour tinged with red, and inclined towards the pectus, which is heart-shaped, and of a brownish black hue. Maxille strong, longer than broad, with the exterior angle, at the extremity, curvilinear; they resemble the mandibles in colour, and incline a little towards the lip, which is semicircular, prominent at the apex, and brownish black. Legs long and slender, provided with hairs and a few spines; their colour is pale yellowish brown, the thighs having a tinge of red. Each tarsus is terminated by three claws; the two superior Ones are curved and pectinated, and the inferior one is inflected near its base. Eyes disposed in two transverse rows on the anterior part of the cephalo- thorax ; the intermediate eyes of both rows form a trapezoid, whose an- terior side is considerably the shortest, and the lateral ones are placed obliquely in pairs, each pair being seated on a small eminence, and gemi- nated ; the posterior eyes of the trapezoid are the largest, and the anterior ones much the smallest of the eight. The third and fourth joints of the palpi are short, the latter, which is much the stronger, being prominent on the inner side, at the lower extremity: the fifth joint is of an irrregular oval figure, convex and hairy externally, concave within, comprising the palpal organs, which are highly developed, complicated in structure, having a small projection at the upper part, in front, and a large corneous spine, originating in the upper part of the under side, extending to the termina- tion of the joint, where it is curved into a circular form, the extremity projecting a little; the colour of these organs is dark reddish brown, 488 Mr. Blackwall on undescribed Species of Araneide. The convex sides of the fifth or terminal jvints of the palpi are directed towards each other. Abdomen oval, convex above, projecting over the base of the cephalothorax; it is thinly covered with hair, glossy, and brownish black. Plates of the spiracles pale yellowish brown. Some in- dividuals have a series of obscure, angular lines of a yellowish brown co- lour, whose vertices are directed forwards, extending along the middle of the upper part. . Length, from the anterior part of the cephalothorax to the extremity of the abdomen, 4th of an inch; length of the cephalothorax +; ; breadth 2,3 breadth of theabdomen ~,; length of an anterior leg +4; length of a leg of the third pair 3. Specimens of this species were procured under fragments of rock in the woods at Oakland, in September 1835, but they were all males. Linyphia tardipes. The cephalothorax of this interesting species is oval, convex, glossy, de- pressed and somewhat rounded before, with an indentation in the medial line of the posterior region; its colour is reddish brown, with a broad band of blackish brown extending along each side. Mandibles powerful, conical, divergent at the extremities, and inclined towards the pectus; they are terminated by a long nail slightly curved at its extremity, and are armed with two rows of teeth cn the inner surface, the anterior row being re- markably long and fine. Maxille strong, straight, and somewhat quadrate, having the exterior angle, at their extremity, curvilinear. Lip semicircular and prominent at the apex. The pectus, which is heart-shaped, is finely pointed at its posterior extremity. These parts are of a reddish brown colour, the pectus and lip being rather the darkest. Eyes placed on black spots on the anterior part of the cephalothorax; four are intermediate and form a square nearly, the two in front being the largest of the eight ; the other four are disposed in pairs on the sides of the square; the eyes constituting each pair are placed obliquely on a small eminence, and are contiguous. The palpi are furnished with spines, and have a slightly curved, slender claw at their extremity; their colour is reddish brown. Legs moderately robust, supplied with hairs and a few fine, erect spines ; they are of a reddish brown colour obscurely banded with brownish black ; the first pair is the longest, the second and fourth pairs are nearly equal in length, and the third pair is the shortest. Each tarsus is terminated by three claws ; the two superior ones are curved, and the inferior one is in- flected near its base. Abdomen oval, convex above, rather broader at the posterior than the anterior extremity, and projects over the base of the cephalcthorax ; it is thinly covered with hair, glossy, and of a reddish brown colour on the upper side with a few minute, whitish spots inter- spersed, and a series of large, brownish black blotches extending along each side of the medial line ; these blotches unite, as they approach the spinners, and form transverse, curved bands; the sides are brownish black, minutely mottled with reddish brown; the under side is dark brown, or brownish black. Plates of the spiracles pale yellow. Connected with the sexual organs is a large and very prominent, curved process of a dark red-brown colour ; it is abruptly contracted in the curvature, and is recurved at the extremity, which is enlarged and deeply notched. Length, from the anterior part of the cephalothorax to the extremity of the abdomen, 4th of an inch ; length of the cephalothorax ,; breadth 7, ; breadth of the abdomen +';; length of an anterior leg ,4, ; length of a leg of the third pair 4. The male resembles the female in colour, and in the relative length of the legs, but their absolute length is greater, an anterior one measuring __ ms Mr. Blackwall on undescribed Species of Araneid&, 489 3#,ths of an inch. On the anterior part of the cephalothorax, about the region of the eyes, are some longish, black bristles, directed forwards. The third and fourth joints of the palpi are short, the latter being the stronger, and a long, slender bristle projects in front from the anterior ex- tremity of the former: the fifth joint is somewhat oval, being gibbous on the outer margin, and having a large process, or apophysis, curved out- wards, and notched at its extremity, directed upwards from its superior part; it is convex and hairy externally, concave within, comprising the palpai organs, which are highly developed, complex in structure, present- ing several curved, corneous processes, and are of a red-brown colour. The fifth joints of the palpi have their convex sides turned towards each other. In the autumn of 1834, I found specimens of this spider at Oakland, under detached pieces of rock imbedded in a light soil, to the inferior surface of which they attach their cocoons, usually two or three in number, by asmall, fine web. The cocoon is flat on the side in contact with the rock, and convex, with a smail, depressed border, on the opposite one. It measures about 4th of an inch in diameter, is composed of white silk of a fine com- pact texture, and contains, on an average, between thirty and forty sphe- rical eggs of a pale yellow colour, not agglutinated together, but enveloped in delicately soft silk. This species fabricates a small, compact, horizontal sheet of web in the cavities beneath stones, on the under side of which it takes its station in an inverted position. It pairs in the month of Sep- tember. An approximation to the Theridia may be traced in the dispo- sition and relative size cf the eyes. Tribe, LatTericrap&, Latreille. Genus, Thomisus, Walckenier. Thomisus luctuosus. Cephalethorax inversely heart-shaped, convex, depressed in the pos- terior region, and broadly truncated before; it is of a brown colour, veined with lines of a deeper shade, and hasa fine line of yellowish white on the lateral margin; a short band of a yellowish white hue, bifid before, on each side of which is a spot of the same colour, situated on an irregular, black patch, occupies the medial line of that portion of the cephalothorax which is in contact with the abdomen, and a faint brownish white spot oc- curs on the inner side of the tubercles on which the anterior eyes of the lateral pairs are seated. Eyes disposed in front, in two transverse, curved rows, forming 2 crescent ; the lateral eyes of both rows are larger than the rest, those of the anterior row being the largest of all, and are situated on projections of the cephalothorax. Mandibles short, strong, vertical, cunei- form. Maxille inclined towards the lip, which is triangular. Pectus ob- long heart-shaped.. These parts, with the legs and palpi, are of a dark brown colour, the legs being streaked and spotted with brown of a deeper shade, and yellowish white at the joints. The first and second pairs of legs, whose dimensions considerably exceed those of the third and fourth pairs, are nearly equal in length, the second pair being slightly the longer ; and the longitudinal extent of the fourth pair surpasses that of the third. Each tarsus has two curved, deeply pectinated claws at its extremity. Abdomen oval, depressed, wrinkled, broader at its posterior than its anterior ex- tremity, and projects over the base of the cephalothorax ; its colour is dark brown obscurely mottled with pale brown and yellowish white, parti- cularly on the upper part. Plates of the spiracles reddish brown. Length, from the anterior part of the cephalothorax to the extremity of the abdomen, 4th of an inch; length of the cephalothorax 4th; breadth Third Serics. Vol. 8. No. 49. June 1836. 3D 490 Mr. Blackwall on undescribed Species of Araneidze. tx; breadth of the abdomen +; length of a leg of the second pair 4; length of a leg of the third pair 4. I discovered the female of this species, which seems to belong to the section Cancroides, in September 1834, in the woods at Oakland, on the trunks of trees which had been felled. In July it constructs a lenticular cocoon of white silk, of a compact texture, measuring about 4th of an inch in diameter, in which it deposits between 80 and 90 spherical eggs, of a pale yellowish white colour, not agglutinated together. The cocoon is often placed between two leaves connected by a slight tissue of silk, form- ing a kind of sack, usually containing the female, which sits upon the cocoon and is greatly attached to it. Tribe, CITIGRADZ, Lege Genus, Lycosa, Lycosa exigua. Cephalothorax large, hairy, somewhat oval, compressed before, with de- pressed, sloping sides, and a narrow indentation in the medial line of the posterior region; its colour is dark brown, with three longitudinal bands of a pale yellowish brown tint, one extending along each side, and the third occupying the carina. Mandibles strong, conical, armed with a few teeth on the inner surface, reddish brown, and inclined towards the pectus, which is heart-shaped, of a very dark brown colour, approaching to black, and is thinly covered with whitish hairs. Maxillz short, powerful, straight, enlarged and rounded at the extremity, and of a pale reddish brown colour. Lip quadrate, and of a dark, dull brown colour, being palest at the apex. Eyes unequal in size; four, which are minute, form a row in front, the two exterior ones being the smallest; the other four are placed on the sides of the anterior part of the cephalothorax, and form a square nearly, the anterior pair being the largest of the eight. Legs and palpi long, moderately robust, and provided with hairs and strong spines ; they are of a pale reddish brown colour, with spots and longitudinal streaks of a brownish black hue on the upper part and sides; these spots and streaks are most conspicuous on the thighs, and on the second joint of the palpi. The palpal claw is curved and pectinated. Each tarsus has two curved, deeply pectinated claws at its extremity. Abdomen oval, hairy, convex above, projecting over the base of the cephalothorax ; it is dark brown on the upper side, with three yellowish white spots in front, the intermediate one, which is the largest, and is faintly bordered with brownish black, extending backwards nearly half the length of the abdomen; on each side of the medial line, on the posterior half of the abdomen, occurs a series of alternate blackish and white spots, the latter being much the smaller; the two series, which are rather obscure in some specimens, con- verge to the spinners, where they meet; the sides are yellowish brown, spotted with dark brown; the under side is pale yellowish, or reddish brown. Plates of the spiracles very dark brown. Length, from the anterior part of the cephalothorax to the extremity of the abdomen, 1th of an inch; length of the cephalothorax 4; breadth 5; ; breadth of the abdomen +',; length of a posterior leg 44.; length of a leg of the third pair 53,. The male is rather smaller than the female, and darker coloured, but the relative length of its legs is the same. The third and fourth joints of the palpi are short, the latter being the stronger of the two: the fifth joint is oval and pointed at the extremity, which is armed with a small claw; it is convex and hairy externally, concave within, except at the end, which is solid, and comprises the palpal organs; they are highly developed, com- The Rey. P. Keith on the Conditions of Germination. 491 plex with corncous processes, and are of a very dark reddish brown co- lour. This species occurs in pasture fields in Denbighshire. In the month of June the female spins a lenticular cocoon of yellowish or greenish brown silk, of a compact texture, with a whitish margin of a slighter texture ; it contains between 50 and 60 yellowish white eggs of a spherical figure, not agglutinated together. The cocoon, which is always connected with the spinners of the female, and is carried along with her, measures about jth of an inch in diameter; when the young quit it they attach themselves to the body of the mother. Oakland, Denbighshire, 1836. LXXXIV. Of the Conditions of Germination, in reply to M. DeCandolle. By the Rev. P. Ketru, £.L.8.* OTHUING can be so gratifying to an author as the com- mendation that comes from a critic of acknowledged ta- lent and learning—* laudatus d laudato viro.” But we, the oi moaaos of botanical scribblers, ought, perhaps, to rest satis- fied, and to think ourselves very well off if a first- or second- rate wrangler in the science condescends to take notice of us, if it were but for the purpose of giving us a rap on the knuckles. In my System of Physiological Botany published in 1816+, I enumerated five conditions as necessary to the process of the germination of the seed, and thought I had adduced good grounds for the said enumeration. Yet its accuracy has been impugned by a great botanist, and my five conditions reduced to three. I ought, perhaps, to submit in silence, and take in good part the correction of a great master; but as I am not satisfied of the soundness of the views of my corrector, I will venture to vindicate my original statement.—Proceed we now to the article itself. I. The first condition necessary to germination is the ma- turity of the seed. Unripe seeds seldom germinate, because their parts are not yet prepared ta form the chemical combi- nations on which germination depends. ‘This fact M. De Candolle denies, saying that “ M. Keith ne sest pas ex- primé avec precision lorsqu’il a posé la maturité de la graine, pour premiere condition générale et nécessaire a la germina- tion”; and adding that Senebier and ‘Treviranus succeeded in making green peas to germinate a short time before they were absolutely ripet{. If M. DeCandolle had read to the end of the paragraph which he criticizes, he would have seen that the identical exception which he specifies is mentioned by * Communicated by the Author. + Vol. ii. p. 3. { Phys. Veg. il. 662. 492 The Rev. P. Keith on the Conditions of Germination, Mr. Keith. He would have seen also that radish-seed, which M. Lefébure could not prevail upon to germinate till it was quite ripe, will germinate, when it pleases to do so, before that period arrives. If left long upon the stalk in a wet sea- son it will germinate even in the pod. Also Jemon-seed will sometimes germinate in the very centre of its pulpy pericarp even before the fruit is cut open. After all, we regard these apparent exceptions as amounting absolutely to nothing. The seeds were not ripe, it is true, in the common acceptation of the term, which supposes them to be as dry and as hard as a bone; but they were ripe in the physiological acceptation of it, and that is enough. ‘The seed that will germinate is, physiologically speaking, ripe; that is, its fluids have been so elaborated in the process of its matura- tion, and its solids so vitalized in the assimilation of due aliment, as to be now fully and profitably susceptible of the action of the combined stimuli of the soil and atmosphere. Hence I contend, notwithstanding the objection of M. DeCandolle, that the maturity of the seed is rightly and legitimately placed in the list of the conditions of germination. I do not speak of the experiments of the chemist in bis laboratory; I do not deny that a seed apparently unripe may germinate; but I speak of the operations of the farmer and of the gardener, and ask whether or not it would not be thought most absurd in them if they were to gather and sow their seeds in an unripe state? II. The second condition necessary to germination, or at least to rapid and healthy germination, is the exclusion of light. The practice of the raking in of the grains, or seeds, sown by the farmer or gardener is founded upon this principle. But it does not seem to have engaged the notice of men of science, or to have heen proved by direct and intentional ex- periment till lately. The first direct experiments that were instituted on this subject are those of Ingenhousz. He found that seeds germinate faster in the shade than in the sun, and hence concluded that light is prejudicial to germination. Se- nebier, who repeated the experiments of Ingenhousz, had the same result, and drew from them the same conclusion*. The prejudicial effect of light has been thought to be owing to its action on the carbonic acid gas contained in the seed, by which its oxygen is withdrawn too rapidly, its carbon fixed, its mass parched, and the possibility of its germination thus precluded. _ But M. DeCandolle denies that the exclusion of light is necessary: L’exclusion de Ja lumiére est trés-loin d’étre, * Mem. Phys. Chem. vol. ili. p. 341. in Reply to M. DeCandolle. 493 comme on la dit *, unedes conditions nécessaires a la germina- tion: il n’y a personne, en effet, qui n’ait vu des graines ger- mer, quoique exposées a la clarté ft.” Yet this objection is equally invalid with the objection that was made to the maturity of the seed. I do not say that a seed may not ger- minate if left exposed to the light. I do not say that it may not be made todo so. _ But is that giving it a fair chance for early and healthy germination? Is that treating it in a way to bring all toasuccessful issue? For, again, I allude merely to the operations of the farmer and gardener, and not to the experiments of the chemist in his closet ; though I am ready to admit that there is, perhaps, no rule without its exception ; and on this ground it will be easy to find a flaw in almost any rule whatever. Suppose a writer on agriculture were to say that it is necessary for the cultivator who would farm well to keep his corn-fields clear of weeds; the truth of the rule might be denied by any one who was disposed to be captious. For he may turn round upon the rale-maker, and say,— No such thing! What you advance is not the fact, for I have seen many a good crop of corn in fields where the weeds stood higher than the corn itself. This may be all very true; but would it be a good and valid objection against the keeping of corn-fields clear of weeds? Certainly not. What then are we to think of the objections with which M. DeCandolle com- bats the accuracy of the above conditions of germination ? For in the one case he admits that the grains selected for sow- ing should be the largest and the best nourished,—but how can they possibly be so, unless they are left upon the stalk till they are fully ripe?—and in the other case he does not deny that the exclusion of light is useful to germination, he only denies that it is necessary. But if it can be shown to be useful, we maintain that it is on that very account practi- cally necessary. III. = ee Hence we perceive that these waves travel, in the direction of 2 positive, with a velocity equal to aps If »= 8, sin(n é +k,x+ b,), which is a term of the second sum, the move- ment is similar, except that the waves travel in the contrary direction. The second of the equations (3.) gives is s/? 5 %; = 5,4 (1- aera + &c.) 3 an equation affording the same theory of dispersion as that which has been so satisfactorily investigated and verified by * See Airy’s Mathemat. Tracts, p. 259. Undulatory Theory of Light,—continued. 503 Professor Powell in the recent Numbers of your Journal. This I have shown more explicitly in your Number for Ja- nuary last, p. 7. Since, by the last equation, the velocity of the waves, and consequently the refraction of the light at the surface of the medium, depends chiefly upon s,, while the dispersion depends fo s/@ : : upon =a i? and the following terms of the series, we see that the dispersion may be different for different media, though the mean refraction be the same; contrary to the opinion which so long retarded the improvement of refracting tele- scopes. The equations (3.) may, perhaps, lead to a theory of ab- sorption as well as of dispersion; since it is obvious that they may become impossible for particular values of 4 It should be observed that the sums s”, 5,°, s,°, s!°, &c. are not necessarily positive, and I now think it would be better to denote them by s, s,5 Sj s';&c. I adopted the other notation in order to assimilate the formula to those employed in the theory of sound. In the case of undulation which we have been considering, the waves are plane waves, perpendicular to the axis of 2 ; we now pass on to the consideration of converging and diverging waves. Let us take the case of a system of waves going and re- turning to and from a certain point; calling this point the centre of agitation. ‘Then the diameter of the sphere of in- fluence of any molecule being an insensible quantity, it is evi- dent that the minute portion of one of the waves contained within the sphere cannot, at any sensible distance from the centre of agitation, differ sensibly from the same portion of a plane wave. ‘Therefore, as the motion of any molecule is affected only by the molecules within the sphere of its in- fluence, it follows that the equations (3.), which give the ve- 2 " au of plane waves, will also give, at any | 7] point of the system, the velocities with which diverging or converging waves are transmitted in the direction perpendi- cular to the wave-surface at that point. When the molecules are so arranged that the sums s°, 5°, $75 &c. are the same for all directions of the rectangular co- ordinates, the velocities of the waves are the same for every radius drawn from the centre of agitation; and consequently the wave-surfaces are spherical. bia n locities 7 504 Mr. Tovey’s Researches in the If we conceive a slowly tapering cone (fig. 1.) to have its Fig. 1. B E A A sill eae aee pe eebveed C D summit A at the centre of agitation of a system of spherical waves, and if we take the axis of the cone for the axis of 2, it is clear that the displacements £, 4, % of the molecules within the frustum B C D E may be regarded as functions of x and ¢; and may therefore be expressed by the equations (2.), nearly. It is also manifest that the same equations will express the displacements for any other frustum of the me- dium, by making the arbitrary quantities to vary according to the position of the frustum. Consequently, if we suppose = asin(nt—kx+a) for the frustum B C D E, the same equation may be taken to express the value of & for any other frustum of the same cone, by regarding a, 2, k, a as functions of x. Let g be the radius of the sphere of influence of the mole- cules: then, if = were infinitely small, the minute portion of a wave contained within the sphere would be a plane wave, and a, 2, k,a constant. Hence we perceive that these quan- tities must be functions of a and consequently, that we may write 2 ee Ay B £+4c(4) + &e., x x niles, Ata +0 (2) + &c., x x g x 2 gee Am 4 BM 2 4 Om/ g ) aoa x the only variable quantity in these series being z. Now when z is infinite « must be zero; therefore A = 0: and as 8. is, at all sensible distances from the centre of agi- Undulatory Theory of Light. 505 tation, an extremely small quantity, we may reject its powers above the first; therefore « = BS . The quantities x, k, a approach, as x increases, towards the values which they have in the case of plane waves, which values are independent of a. And since the small portion of a wave contained within the sphere of influence of any molecule cannot, at any sensible distance from the centre of agitation, differ sensibly from the same portion of a plane wave, we may regard 7, k, a as con- stant for all parts of the cone. If then we retain @ to denote B Bg, the constant part of —*, we have oi “ sin (nt — kw + a): and, in general, for any cone taken as we have supposed, we have, from the equations (2.), es (sinnt+hk a+b), f=. = sin (nt—ka+a)+ =. a . C i sh ra sin (n,t—hk,x+a,)+ = . Pi sin (n,t+k,x+b,), (4.) s sin (2, f+h,c+0,). When the waves all move from the centre of agitation, the second sums in the equations (4.) will vanish: and limiting our view to a single term of one of the first sums, we have an expression for the displacement virtually the same as that which Professor Airy, in his valuable tract on the Undulatory Theory of Optics, has partly assumed and partly borrowed from the theory of sound*. It may be observed, by the way, that the method adopted in this paper of expressing the displacement of the molecules, is analogous to that employed so successfully in physical astro- nomy to express the differences between the mean and true places of the planets. When the molecules are so arranged that the sums s’, s/’, s,2, &c. are different for different directions of the coordinates, waves going and returning to and from a centre of agitation will not be spherical. The most simple case of such waves will probably furnish a subject for another paper. I am, Gentlemen, yours, &c. Evesham, April 15, 1836. Joun Tovey. P.S. I perceive that throughout my last paper I inadver- tently called the differences Aw, Ay, Az variations. * Mathemat. Tracts, p. 271. Third Series. Vol. 8. No. 49. June 1836. 3F pee irks = ea sin (2,t—k,«+,) + - Rw ROS wal LXXXVII. On the former Extent of the Persian Gulf, and on the Non-identity of Babylon and Babel; in Reply to Mr. Carter. By C. T. Bexe, Esq., £.S.A. To the Editors of the Philosophical Magazine and Journal. GENTLEMEN, (THE opinion which was, in the first instance, advanced by me in the Number of your Journal for February 1824*, was to the effect that the low lands of the Euphrates and Ti- gris have been formed by the gradual deposits of those rivers, and that this operation has been so extensive, that, at the time of the erection of the Babel of Genesis, it must have been phy- sically impossible for that city to be built near the spot where the Babylon of Nebuchadnezzar afterwards stood. ‘This opinion may be considered as embracing two distinct and separate propositions :—the first is that, within the period of history, an advance of the Jand upon the sea has taken place of sufficient importance to affect materially the geography of the localities in question; the second is that, within the same period, that advance has been so great as (independently of all other arguments,) to warrant my conclusion with respect to the non-identity of Babylon and Babel. If the former of these propositions be untrue, @ fortior? must the latter be so; but, on the other hand, even if the former be established, it does not follow that the latter is likewise correct. From Mr. Carter’s former arguments I certainly was led to consider, that he not merely disputed the correctness of the first proposition to its entire extent, but that he went yet further, and contended that the changes (if any) which have taken place, are altogether insignificant. In his present re- marks he says, however f, ‘I much object to such expressions in the reply as, ‘ Mr. Carter has, in fact, asserted the opinion that, since the time of Nearchus, the encroachments on the gulf must be very unimportant,’ omitting the words ‘to the point in question, any later encroachments,’ &c., as conveying the idea of a mere assertion without proof, and a much broader one than my remarks warrant.” I am most anxious that no difference should exist between us on the score of mere mis- conception of each other’s meaning, and [I therefore give at length, in the note at foot, an extract of the whole passage from which I made my citation{; and I put it to the candour * Lond. and Edinb. Phil. Mag., vol. iv. p. 108—111. + Supra, vol. vii. p. 195, t ‘Following the course of Nearchus, as given in his own clear account of the voyage preserved by Arrian, from his arrival at the Arosis, the river Mr. Beke on the former Extent of the Persian Gulf. 507 of my opponent himself, whether I was not fairly authorized in the conclusion which I came to with respect to his mean- ing: indeed I would ask whether, when in his present reply he says, with respect to “the navigation of Alexander and his fleet in the delta streams,” that ‘the ancient canal, the entire circuit, all the points of the navigation then presented by the spot, are still offered for our observation,” it must not be un- derstood as his unqualified opinion that “since the time of Nearchus the encroachments on the gulf have been very un- important.” If I am’so unfortunate as still to misunderstand his meaning, I beg to assure him that I do so most uninten- tionally. As regards the observation that my words ‘convey the idea of a mere assertion without proof,” Mr. Carter must allow me to say, that a construction appears to be put upon them which ought not by any means to be adopted in a discussion like the present. Every proposition advanced, or assertion made, on either side, must be presumed to be made upon what are regarded as ‘‘proofs;” and it is simply from the considered insufficiency of those alleged proofs that the correctness of any such proposition or assertion is questioned on the other side. For my part, I feel that I might have reason to object, not merely to some expressions, but also to the tone generally in which Mr. Carter’s last reply is written; but I refrain from doing so, and I sincerely trust that neither of us will have occasion again to refer to any such unpleasant topic. In order to prevent any future misconception, it is to be understood that the first and principal point in dispute be- tween us is, whether a change of such importance has taken place as materially to affect the geography of the localities in at the N.E. next before coming to the streams of the Delta, in his progress to Kataderbis and the island of Margastana, in his passage through the channel over the shoals to his arrival at Diridotis (by the Khore Abdallah), on the S.W. side of the Delta, and comparing it with the present state of the country, we learn with surprise the small degree of change which the general characters of the coast have undergone during the lapse of so many ages. Dr. Vincent, in his able work on the Commerce and Navigation of the Ancients in the Indian Ocean, adverting to this remarkable fact, ob- serves, that Capt. Howe’s chart ‘ explains the journal of Nearchus as per- fectly as if it had been composed bya person on board of his fleet,’ (vol. i. p- 423.) and (p. 466.) ‘the pilot on board Nearchus’s ship steered exactly the same course’ (along the coast of the Delta) ‘as MacCluer’s Karack pilot 2000 years afterwards.’ The junction of the river called by Arrian the Eulzus (coming from the N. or N.E.) with the Tigris by the still existing ancient Hoffar canal, across which Alexander sent a part of his fleet while he sailed down the Eulzus to the mouths of the Tigris, and so round to meet it (Arrian, Exp. Alex. vii. 7.) further shows that to the point in question any later encroachments on the gulf must be very unimportant.” Lond, and Kdinb, Phil. Mag., vol. v. P 247—8, The Italics are Mr. Carter’s. S8F2 508 Mr. Beke on the former Extent of the Persian Gulf, question; that is to say, a change so great as to render the descriptions of ancient writers inapplicable to the actual coast- line and state of the neighbourhood generally. Seeing that my hypothesis precludes the possibility of Ne- archus’s voyage being made applicable to the present coast of Susiana and the countries at the head of the Persian Gulf, it is scarcely necessary for me expressly to dispute in detail the correctness of the identifications, considered to have been established by Dr. Vincent, of the river Arosis, of Kataderbis, the island of Margastana, Diridotis, &c. &c.* That the river Karoon is not the Eulzeus, nor Shuster the representative of Susa, has already been asserted by many geographers of emi- nence, whose voices are united in favour of Shus and the river Haweeza or Kerrah. Without intending to range myself with these geographers, I believe I am correct in saying that, as between them and Dr. Vincent, the greater show of reason is * Although I am quite willing to concede that “a few miles of addition to the Delta is not the question” between us, yet, as regards the learned Dean’s identifications, I must remark, that a few miles—nay, a very few miles indeed—of addition would (I much suspect,) render it impossible that “Capt. Howe’s chart should explain the journal of Nearchus as perfectly as if it had been composed by a person on board of his fleet.” To establish the correctness of this position, it appears to be necessary, not merely that the coast should have remained unvaried since the time of the Greek navi- gator, but that Capt. Howe’s chart should accurately represent that coast: it ought, consequently, to correspond in all points with the trigonometrical survey recently made by Lieuts. Brucks and Haines, of the East India Com- pany’s Marine Service. By the kindness of Capt. Horsburgh I have been furnished with copies of the Company’s chart, as also of that of Lieut. MacCluer (by Dalrymple, 1786 and 1788): Capt. Howe’s he was not in possession of. Owing to the longitude not being marked in MacCluer’s, J am prevented from making an exact comparison of these two charts; still differences of sufficient moment are to be detected between them. For instance, the island of Karack is represented by MacCluer as being 8, and Korgo more than 4 geographical miles long, whereas they are actually just half those lengths respectively : Buna (Derabuna), by the Core Moosah, is made as much as 9 miles long, from north to south, and 3 miles broad, whilst it is only 3 miles long, and less than 1 mile broad, its length being from east to west: Derah, adjoin- ing this Jast island, is made 7 miles long and 3 miles broad, but it is in fact only a mile and a half each way: the Core Abdallah, represented in the copy of 1786 as being 10 miles broad, with 8 miles of coast between it and the mouth of the Bussorah river, and in that of 1788 as only 6 miles broad, with about 10 miles of coast, is actually 12 miles broad, and the two mouths meet at a point, without any coast intervening. These variations (which are only a portion of what might be pointed out,) may be said to be but trifles with respect to “the general characters of the coast ;” still they are more than sufficient to show that MacCluer’s chart would have been rather a dangerous guide for Nearchus to have placed implicit confidence in. Capt. Howe’s chart, which was adopted by Dr. Vincent, is (I believe) not even so correct as that of MacCluer; but I have not at present the means of referring to the Dean’s work, so as to ascertain this positively. and on the Non-identity of Babylon and Babel. 509 on their side. Under their hypothesis, however, Charax, which was situate at the confluence of the Tigris and Eulzeus, will have to be placed not 37 but about 100 miles up the river; so that “the plain fact” by which ‘even the increase of 35 miles” in the distance of that city from the sea is “an- nihilated” in so summary a manner, is not quite so manifest. The position of Charax remains, I conceive, yet to be deter- mined; but, let it have been where it may, I confess I do not exactly understand how my “extravagant hypothesis” is to be ‘at once disposed of,” for the reason that, “if the distance of Charax, the port, had increased but 70 miles” (or it may be only 35 miles,) between the times of Alexander and Pliny (400 years), “‘the whole distance to Babylon could have increased but 70” (or 35) miles in the 2160 years which have elapsed since the voyage of Nearchus down to the present time. Leav- ing the ‘extravagant hypothesis” quite out of the question, it appears to me that, assuming the same rate of increase through- out the whole period, the gain would be about 380 (or 190) miles. The “‘diversitas auctorum” of which Pliny complains, is a point upon which Mr. Carter makes a great stand; and hence he comes to the strange conclusion, that the distance between Babylon and Charax was “utterly uncertain.” Now it may be perfectly comprehensible that the naturalist should have been in difficulty upon the subject, and unable to arrive at any satisfactory result, on account of the apparent discrepan- cies among the various authorities which were before him ; yet it will not, I presume, be thence argued, that either Babylon or Charax was so situate as not to have been perfectly easy of access, so that the distance between them might always have been ascertainable, in the same way as it would be in the present day (and perhaps with less difficulty,) were both cities in existence. There is not the slightest reason, therefore, for imagining that “the distance was utterly uncertain.” The various authors must be presumed to have made their several statements upon good grounds, and with a competent know- ledge of the actual distance; and whatever discrepancies may be found among them, beyond those which will always exist where distances are only estimated and not actually measured, are mainly, if not entirely, to be attributed to differences in the standards of measurement employed by them respectively. And this, in fact, is what Pliny himself says: ‘Inconstantiam mensurae” (the measure itself and not the distance measured,) *‘diversitas auctorum facit: cum Perse quoque schceenos et pa- rasangas, alii alia mensura determinent*.” 'This difficulty be- * Hist. Nat., lib. vi. cap. 27. 510 Mr. Beke on the former Extent of the Persian Gulf, comes no slight one when, as was frequently the case, those standards of measurement, although of widely different lengths, had the same name*; added to which, we must bear in mind that the various distances recorded were, at various times, applicable to different states of the country, in those portions of it which were liable to change. The possible ex- istence of errors of copyists is, of course, not to be lost sight of; but I question much whether we may be authorized to en- tertain “serious doubts of the authenticity” of passages which do not exactly coincide with our preconceived notions. In his former papert Mr. Carter cites various authorities in illustration of the passage from Pliny, in part originally quoted by met; which passage he understands (though I can- not conceive how,) to mean that “long before Pliny’s time the two rivers had united above the embouchure somewhere, not by encroachments on the gulf and formation of delta, but simply by the labour of hands;’ and in his present reply that gentleman repeats that those various authorities “ all harmonize with the unbroken sense of this passage :” meaning, of course, as it is interpreted by him. I confess that in my last answer I dismissed these authorities rather summarily, and I did so on account of my not being able to discover their application, and on account also of the “discrepancies” exist- ing among them, which my opponent himself admitted §. And on this point an explanation is due from me to Mr. Carter. In your Number for June last (1835), I stated that “these autho- rities, according to his (Mr. C.’s) admission, contain ‘some dis- crepancies,’ and are not always ‘very explicable,’” in which I was thus far wrong: the being not “‘ very explicable” was (as he now observes,) * distinctly ‘applied by him ¢o Pliny’s general account of the two rivers only,” the “discrepancies” having * We have a precisely analogous case in the various miles of the present day, and we may easily conceive the case of a geographer in future ages being strangely perplexed on this account. Take, for instance, the distance between St. Petersburg and Riga, which by a Swede would be said to be 50 miles ; by a German, 71 miles; and by an Englishman, 285 or 330 miles; whilst a Frenchman would call it 95 or 118 leagues, and a Russian 495 wersts; to which might be added, perhaps, twenty other measures of modern Europe (principally miles), all differing with one another. Here would be ample ground for complaining, as Pliny did, of the “inconstantia mensure,” but certainly none for the conclusion that ‘‘the distance was utterly un- certain.” + Lond. and Edinb. Phil. Mag., vol. v. p. 249. { “Inter duorum amnium ostia 25 mill. pass. fuere, aut (ut alii tradunt) 7 mill. utroque navigabili. Sed longo tempore Euphratem preclusere Or- cheni, et accolz agros rigantes; nec nisi Pasitigri defertur in mare.” — Hist. Nat., lib. vi. cap. 27. § “ But notwithstanding some discrepancies, the conclusion from the above authorities surely is,” &c. . and on the Non-identity of Babylon and Babel. 511 been intended by him (as will be seen from the last note,) to apply merely to the rest of the authorities cited by him. Iam most happy to be able thus to correct my error. As regards these various ‘‘ harmonizing,” “ discrepant ” authorities, I even now refrain from considering them in de- tail; for it would only needlessly be taking up much room, since my remarks would be little more than the continued repetition, with respect to each of them individually, of the assertion which I make respecting them collectively; namely, that Iam unable to see their applicability, either to Pliny’s statement as above explained by Mr. Carter, or to the present condition of the country. It will not be denied that the gene- ral conclusion from them is, that the two rivers in question “have, at a very early period, united inland somewhere ;” but I cannot conceive by what possible means the further con- clusion is to be arrived at from them, that ** Khorna was the grand confluence in all ages*;” for the two rivers may, by the union of their deltas, have formed a junction at some point much further inland, and yet, for ages afterwards, have still continued their (in part) separate courses to the sea. Among the many writers thus cited by Mr. Carter, is the geographer Ptolemy, to whom, however, whilst he quotes the particular passages from the other authors which he considers applicable, he refers only in general terms. Yet Ptolemy’s description of these rivers, and the countries through which they flow, is that, perhaps, which is the most important of the whole, and which, consequently, requires to be more particu- larly considered. ‘The purport of this description appears to be as follows: That to the north of Babylon the Euphrates divided itself into two streams, whereof the one flowed south- ward by that city, and the other eastward past Seleucia: that between these two branches of the Euphrates there was a river called the Basilius, which, on the one hand, fell into the Ti- gris below Apamea, and, on the other hand, joined the main stream of the Euphrates flowing past Babylon, at some di- stance below that city: that the Euphrates likewise threw off an arm called the Baarsares; and that both this arm and also the main stream itself, continued their courses southward, and divided themselves into several subordinate branches, with which they formed lakes and marshes towards the head of the Persian Gulft. The Alexandrian philosopher’s account must, of course, be * How does such a conclusion tally with the notion that the Orcheni “united” the two rivers “ simply by the labour of hands”? Did they make the junction at Khorna? t+ ‘H rov EvQecrov Séois, nab yy oxiCerat sis re trav dice Babuaraavos 512 Mr. Beke on the former Extent of the Persian Gulf, taken with all the imperfections in geographical knowledge belonging to his age; but the whole context affords a mani- fest indication that, so late as about his time, (the beginning of the second century of our zera,) the Euphrates possessed its separate delta, of which the apex was above Babylon, and of which the western branches formed lakes and marshes below that city; whilst (although the junction is not mentioned,) the most eastern branch, as it passed by Seleucia, must have joined the Tigris. The outlet of the lakes and marshes into the sea is also not described; in fact, as Pliny tells us, it was already closed up by the Orcheni: but the authorities cited by Mr. Carter, as also Herodotus to whom I shall presently refer, plainly show that, at an earlier period, the delta streams of the Euphrates had their separate union with the Persian Gulf. In my last paper* I attempted to show how these lakes and marshes at the mouths of the Euphrates would, in the first instance, have been produced, and how, subsequently, the branches of the river which formed them would successively have been stopped and filled up by the operation of natural means, the western branches being those which were first closed. The Orcheni would have finished the work of nature by stopping up the eastern arm, which, till then, discharged itself into the sea, not more than 25 or 27 miles (as stated by Pliny,) from the western mouth of the Tigris; and the lakes and marshes of the Euphrates, having no longer a channel through them, would then gradually have become silted up, in the manner I have further suggested in the same paper. Much light would be thrown upon the subject if, by local examination, it were determined (which it might be without much difficulty,) how far westward the course of any branch of the Euphrates has once extended +. piovra, ab tov Oi Dercunsins, Gv 6 msteey xarsivas Basiasiog rorepoc, Ob Sols THe EXTLOTNS LLOLLLS sereeeeseoerene veeee 00 AE x. —Lib. v. cap. 18. "ACEI acececncercctnccnnccnseronsccessonesen abs KOS. iD qv 4 tov Baoirsiov rorapmov reds tov Tier ovpeSoay, yy Ae Kage. —Ibid. Arcepétovar 02 rAv xaouv OTe Basirsios worms, nal 6 bie tHe BaGvadvos fav, xal 6 xaerovuevos Beccegoccens: os Tw wiv EvQeary ovpearrss, xara Seow ZOE OVTLY (OT rrerscseceeceeesees snadahttogech aces a6 XO So’. Ta 0: die Baluarwvias, os xarsizas 0 Buoirsioc rorepos CUVEE TOV. of =O a’. Tlosotor té of roramol obrol, nal wi ax witav exteoral Aluvas nal Edn, Sv vod evry cov ered sabres LT ccceeersere in s’ XB s’.—Lib.v. cap. 20. Edit. Basil. 1533. * Lond. and Edinb. Phil. Mag., vol. vii. p. 45. + The most eastern branch of the Euphrates, which joined the Tigris above Babylon, would appear also to have become closed, unless indeed it and on the Non-identity of Babylon and Babel. 513 At the present moment (as I have before remarked,) I do not consider that our present knowledge of the countries in question is sufficient to enable us to come to any entirely satisfactory conclusion, or to reconcile the various apparently conflicting statements of antiquity, which evidently cannot be made to apply (under favour of Mr. Carter must it be said,) to the present state of the country, and which it will require much labour and not less caution to adapt to any hypothetical condition of the country. But one point, which is not suffi- ciently attended to by commentators generally, cannot be too strongly borne in mind by those who may apply themselves to the task. It is, that where a fact is expressly asserted by a writer of character, who possessed the means of knowing it, its correctness must be admitted, until something positive be al- leged sufficient to invalidate it. Mr. Carter appears entirely to neglect this rule, when he cites Arrian as “saying ex- pressly, the Euphrates has a higher channel than the Tigris, which receives the waters of the Euphrates by many streams,” and yet, without hesitation, stigmatizes this an “error.” Per- fectly true it may be, as Col. Chesney reports, that, in the present day, “the Tigris gives a large contribution to the sister stream by the canal of the Hie, about 220 miles above the gulf;” but may it not be equally true, that formerly the two rivers united much higher up, at a point at which their relative levels were as Arrian so expressly states them to have been? The mere circumstance that the river Al Huali or Hermas, which at the present day runs in a direction towards the west so as to unite with the Khabour, is considered to have had in former times an eastward course and to have joined the Tigris*, is in entire accordance with such a state of things. Mr. Carter says, “* Xenophon understood this better [than Arrian]: he mentions four canals by which the latter [the Ti- gris] pours its waters into the Euphrates +.” Did Xenophon really say this, I should be compelled to admit his testimony, as that of a man of unquestioned honour and integrity and an eye-witness, even in spite of the express assertion of Arrian to the contrary ; but it is far from being the case, and Mr, Carter has evidently been misled from consulting merely some loose was kept open by artificial means, in which case it would, in the result, have been regarded merely as a canal. * See Rennell’s Illustrations of the Retreat of the Ten Thousand, p. 102; see also Orig. Bibl., p. 113, where the opinion is expressed that “at the time when the extent northward of the Persian Gulf was much greater than it is at present...... the river Al Huali had its separate course to the sea.” + Anab,, lib. i. cap. 7. Third Series. Vol. 8. No.49. June 1836. 3G 514 Mr. Beke on the former Extent of the Persian Gulf. and inaccurate version. A reference to the original would have shown him that what the author really says respecting these four canals is simply cicGaAdovor 02 cig tov Edgperny: correctly rendered in the Oxford version (edit. 1676), ‘Iidem in Euphratem znfluunt,” and by Spelman “ they fall into the Euphrates.” Smaller streams are commonly said to fall into larger ones with which they communicate, so that these words do not necessarily convey any idea beyond that of mere union; and the writer being near the Euphrates (see the next para- graph of the text,) would naturally describe these canals as tributaries to that river, even had the actual run of the waters been in the other direction. Seeing, however, that these ca- nals were navigable, and that they were of course made without locks, it is manifest that no great difference of level between the two rivers could have existed ; and whichever way it may have been, most assuredly there was not, in a country which to this day is almost a dead flat, any opportunity for the one river to ‘pour its waters into” the other. Mr. Rich tells us in his Memoir on the Ruins of Babylon (2nd edit. p. 18), that during the inundation of the Euphrates “rafts laden with lime are brought almost every day from Felugiah to within a few hundred yards of the northern gate of Bagdad.” This must (I have reason to believe) be under- stood as referring to a canal existing there, which joins the two rivers, and which is filled during the flooded season; but even here, no less than 380 (600—220) miles above the Hie, by which (as Col. Chesney informs us, ) the Euphrates receives the waters of the Tigris, the levels of the two rivers so closely correspond as to allow of a navigable communication ex- isting between them! Mr. Carter has discoursed very learn- edly respecting the mode in which rivers produce their deltas, but there appears to be a fundamental defect in his reasoning: he takes as a “fact” that the Tigris ‘can be more rapid (than the Euphrates] only through flowing from a higher country down a greater slope.” But if we look to what is actually the fact, we find that at two distinct points, namely, at Felugiah (opposite Bagdad) and at Khorna, the Tigris and Euphrates are of equal (or nearly equal) heights. Between these two points, however, we have the unquestionable evidence of Col. Chesney that the two rivers are “very different in every respect,” the former moving in a rapid and the latter in a dull and lingering stream. This difference in character is clearly not produced by the Tigris ‘flowing from a higher country down a greater slope,” since at Bagdad that river is no higher than the Eu- phrates at Felugiah. Other causes have therefore to be sought for, among which may be noticed the greater length of the Prof. Young on the Theory of Vanishing Fractions. 515 Euphrates between these two points and the breadth of its bed in the lower portion of its course, both which causes must produce a corresponding diminution in its speed, and on the other hand the contraction of the channel of the Tigris, which must be attended with a corresponding acceleration of the mo- tion of its waters. Col. Chesney is referred to as describing the Euphrates as in the present day flowing in a dull and lingering stream: Herodotus, also an eye-witness, in his description of Babylon talks of the “deep and rapid streams of the great Euphrates *.” No one will for a moment doubt the accuracy of Col. Chesney’s observation; but is not credit also due to Herodotus? and is he, in like manner as Arrian, to be “unceremoniously thrown overboard,” whilst the facts respecting the former condition of these rivers remain unascertained? In the passage last cited, the Halicarnassian traveller further expressly asserts that the Euphrates “discharges itseif into the Persian Gulf;” which assertion he confirms in his more detailed statement that that river, “ which before flowed in an almost straight line,” had its course so turned by Nitocris, that in his time, “those who wished ¢o go from the sea up to Babylon were compelled to touch at Ardericca three times on three different days+.” Surely such unqualified and unequivocal assertions of plain matters cf fact are entitled to consideration, and are not to be put aside as errors simply because they are not applicable to the present state of things, or rather, perhaps, because they do not coin- cide with what we have been taught by former commentators to receive as the truth. [To be continued. ] LXXXVIII. On the Theory of Vanishing Fractions. By J. R. Youne, Esg., Professor of Mathematics in Belfast College. N a letter inserted in the April number of this Journal (p. 295) I ventured to offer some objections to certain novel positions, lately advanced by an ingenious mathematician, in an Essay on the Fundamental Principles of the Differential and Inte- gral Calculus. To these objections the author of the Essay as furnished a reply, in the number for May (p. 393); and I am happy to find, from the general tone of it, that Mr. Wool- house has considered my scruples with the same good feeling in which they were avowedly offered. * Ea wiyas, nal Babds, nal raxds, eSler d€ odtos és Thy “Epudeqv Sarno- cav.—Clio, 180. + Clio, 185, t Communicated by the Author, s8G2 516 Prof. Young on the Theory of Vanishing Fractions. In my former communication, I contented myself with sim- ply pointing out the fallacy involved in the extremely general statements which I extracted from the Essay referred to; and with tracing the source of this fallacy to the circumstance of the author having unguardedly assumed the converse of a cer- tain proposition, to be equally general with the proposition itself, which converse holds however only in particular cases. The direct proposition to which I here allude is this, viz. that when in certain hypotheses any of the analytical conditions of a problem disappear, the final result, to which the general process leads, takes the form 2. The converse proposition is, that when the final result takes the form © original conditions must have disappeared. ‘This latter is the affirmation distinctly conveyed, without the slightest qualification, in the propositions marked II. and III. in Mr. Woolhouse’s reply; and it will be remembered, that against those propositions only my objec- tions were directed; for.I cheerfully admitted that much of Mr. Woolhouse’s Essay was ‘in strict accordance with the usual notions of this doctrine.” To show that these objections were valid, I adduced an in- stance (that of a geometrical series) in which the propositions objected to would lead to error; and in adverting to this in- stance, in his reply, it will be seen that my respected friend has not defended the positions in question from the charge of making the sum of the said geometrical series anything, but has shown that another position (Prop. IV.), a position which was never impugned, is competent to supply the correct result. Surely my ingenious friend does not consider it to be a suffi- cient defence of Proposition III. to prove that its affirmations are neutralized by Proposition IV.; and yet there is no other at- tempt made to establish its truth. The proposition which Mr. Woolhouse discusses at page 395, does not at all contribute to this object; for that is the converse of the one which it behoves him to prove, in order to establish his third principle: this principle requires the proposition stated above, in Italics, and not the one which Mr. Woolhouse has demonstrated in the preceding Number. There is no dispute as to the form of the result when conditions vanish; the question is, does this form necessarily imply vanishing conditions in the original analytical statement of the problem? Mr. Woolhouse’s third principle unequivocally states z# does. But innumerable examples to the contrary may be adduced. The well-known problem of Clairaut, which has for its object the determination of the spot between two lights, which is equally illuminated by both, is a case in point, and furnishes a satisfactory refutation of the Prof. Young on the Theory of Vanishing Fractions. 517 principle in question, as may be seen by a reference to the Algebra of Lacroix, where the circumstances of the problem are discussed at Jength. The ordinary expression for the ra- dius of curvature of a plane curve, will also furnish other ex- amples of the fallacy of the assumed principle; for when, in any particular example, that expression takes the form of a fraction, as r = ray we have, by differentiating, pean ee and it is well known that whatever values of x and y render this expression equal to zero, the same values, provided they fulfill the original condition, or equation of the curve, will be- long to points in it of maximum or minimum curvature ; or to points at which the contact with the osculating circle is above the second order. Now it is plain that the conditions P= 0, Q=O eressecscccceee’ (2) will cause a value of (1) to be zero; if, therefore, these con- ditions furnish for x and y values which satisfy the equation of the curve, the points to which they refer will be distin- guished from the other points by the order of contact being higher there than elsewhere. Instead of deducing this con- clusion from the expression r = 9? We Ought, in accordance with Mr. Woolhouse’s third principle, to say that at every such point the radii of curvature are innumerable, which is obviously absurd. As an example, let us take the common parabola, of which the equation is y? = 4m 2. By the usual process we obtain for 7 the expression _ fm+e = ALS 8 x "4m? Q”’ and the conditions (2) are, in this case, Liege ab (m +a)%y= 0, Amat = 0, which are satisfied by the values x = 0, y = 0; and these values, fulfilling the original condition y? = 4m x, it follows that the origin of the axes, that is the vertex of the parabola, is a point at which the contact is above the second order, and this we know to be the case from other considerations, It is unnecessary to multiply examples illustrative of the fallacy of this third principle “as a general rule,” and indeed a passage in the reply of my Menta friend leads me to sus- pect that, while writing that reply, he himself had some mis- 518 Prof. Young on the Theory of Vanishing Fractions. givings about it. The passage I refer to is at page 396, where Mr. Woolhouse, in his reasonings on the form °, limits his arguments to those comparatively few cases in which the re- sults of that form are obtained in such a way, “that no mul- tiplication or division by a power of x — a occurs in the pro- cess.” If only results obtained under such restrictions as these are admitted to come under the second and third prin- ciples, then the generality of those principles is of course at once given up, and my friend and J are thus far agreed. But then so limited a principle of interpretation falls greatly short of a general theory; and moreover requires, inits application, an acquaintance with the texture of the entire process too minute to be generally attainable; it requires, in fact, that we know the composition of every multiplier and divisor employed,—an impossible problem beyond certain limits. At page 399, Mr. Woolhouse enters into a digression upon ‘the general theory of analytical results,” respecting which he considers me to be in error, because in my last letter I had said that the fact of the ellipse question, admitting multiple solutions, was information which the analytical result was quite incompetent to supply; and he observes, “I never before heard of the incompetency of an analytical result to afford any positive information that an investigation could admit of.” In this gratuitous admission of paucity of information upon sub- jects in which he so eminently excels, my friend has done him- self a wanton injustice. He is too profoundly acquainted with all the subtleties of the Integral Calculus, and its applications, not to have “heard of” singular solutions, which, though not comprised in the resulting integrals which furnish the general solutions to certain differential equations, have, nevertheless, the property of satisfying the proposed conditions. But a more comprehensive view of the results of even common alge- bra, would, I think, have induced my friend to withhold the remark just quoted. Mr. Woolhouse ascertains the number of admissible solutions from “the nature of the problem.” By taking a more enlarged view, it would have occurred to him that the result might furnish solutions, not only contrary to the express stipulations of the problem, but at variance with even the original analytical conditions, although these may have a much wider range. The results after these “ so- lutions étrangéres” are rejected from them, are those from among which are to be selected the solutions to the problem. In the present discussion it is the connexion between the ana- lytical conditions and the analytical results, which is the mat- ter before us; and it is, I suspect, from not keeping this in mind, that Mr. Woolhouse has been led to say, in mistake, Prof. Young on the Theory of Vanishing Fractions. 519 that “ Professor Young involves himself in a palpable incon- sistency when he arrives at the fact of the ellipse question admitting multiple solutions, by an examination of the origi- nal analytical conditions, and at the same time alleges that the analytical result is quite incompetent to supply that informa- tion.” The mathematical readers of this Journal will however readily perceive, that what is here,charged as “ palpable in- consistency” is in perfect accordance with the strictest analy- tical accuracy ; and that the “inconsistency” would have been, in inferring the multiple solutions from the analytical result, without reference to the original conditions, as Mr. Woolhouse has done, thus assuming (what is not true) that the converse of a certain proposition holds merely because the proposition itself is known to be true. Mr. Horner in the present volume of this Journal (p. 43.) has brought forward whole cluster of instances, in each of which, as he clearly shows, “ the ana- lytical result is quite incompetent to supply the information” even as to whether the question admits of a single solution, much less as to whether it admits of multiple solutions: the information sought must be obtained in all these cases, as I have obtained it in the ellipse question, viz. by a direct appeal to “ the original analytical conditions.” Without such an ap- peal how are we to know whether the analytical result to which the condition Qa4+Vx2?7—T=5 leads, viz. 32°— 202+ 32=0, will supply values competent to satisfy that condition? The presumption is that it w2// supply such values; upon trial how- ever we find them to fail: and yet these values will satisfy the immediately antecedent equation, but this is not sufficient ; every anterior step must be satisfied, up to the original equa- tion inclusively ; and the error committed in overlooking this would be precisely similar to that which Mr. Woolhouse ap- pears to me tohave committed, in inferring the multiple solutions to the ellipse question, merely because these solutions satisfy the final result*. ‘The same mistaken view of the “theory of * It is but justice to Mr. Woolhouse to state, however, that he admits (p. 399) that “ the nature of the problem, as originally presented, is the pro- per source of rejective information,” although he maintains that the original analytical conditions do not furnish the proper source of information, as to whether, in certain hypotheses, one of those conditions becomes destroyed, or two or more of them become dependent ; but, on the contrary, that the Oo. , side a . result 5 8 asufficient indication that one or other of these circumstances must take place. (See III. p. 394.) Ihave endeavoured to show, however, that this result is not competent to furnish any information on the subject. 520 Prof. Young on the Theory of Vanishing Fractions. analytical results” accompanies his animadversions at page 398-9 in the last number of this Journal; he appears to think it sufficient that the antecedent equation should be satisfied, for he remarks, ‘* The corresponding antecedent equation to the result z = 2, when cleared of fractions, is 07 = 0, or 0 = 0, an equation that is obviously satisfied without any limitation to the value of z, and that cannot fail therefore to be compa- tible with the other equations or conditions.” The statement, in connexion with this remark, viz. that “‘® can never be the symbol of absurdity,” has a little surprised me, because the contrary is a fact so generally known to analysts. To occupy these pages by examples of this would be quite superfluous, as they abound in most of the Continental books on algebra. In the comprehensive work of Bourdon there is an ample supply of such examples, and from which he deduces the ordinary conclu- sion, viz. that “le symbol © est tantot un caractére d’indéter- mination, tantot un caractére d’absurdité.” From what has now been said of the symbol 2, it appears that, when it is not the indication of absurdity, or of incompati- ble conditions, it may arise from either of these two causes: viz. i ‘ Sie Je 1° from taking the ultimate, or limiting, value of =, the general result of an analytical process; or, without regard to this ex- treme limit, it may arise from the destruction of one or more of the conditional equations. One or other of these circum- stances must take place in connexion with the occurrence of 5 whenever this symbol is at all interpretable. I say when- ever the symbol is znterpretable, for cases may arise in which this symbol is indicative of neither multiple solutions, nor of li- miting values, nor of incompatible conditions. In such cases therefore other modes of solution must be sought. ‘The in- stances to which I now allude are among those in which the vanishing of the numerator is not necessarily accompanied by the vanishing of the denominator ; but where each vanishes in- dependently, in virtue of distinct hypotheses introduced among the arbitrary quantities in each. With the exception of these unintelligible results, the occurrence of © is always traceable to one or other of the circumstances before mentioned; which circumstances, although having no necessary connexion, may nevertheless, as in the case of the ellipse question, both exist simultaneously. When therefore 5 takes the place of =, in any hypothesis, Be ii P we may be assured that the limiting values of Q will always . Mr. Faraday on the Condensation of the Gases, &c. 521 subsist with the original analytical conditions, however they may be modified under the proposed hypothesis; but we can neither deny, nor affirm, that other values may also subsist with these conditions; for ‘this is information which the ana- lytical result is quite incompetent to supply,” and which must be derived solely from ascertaining the effect of the proposed hypothesis upon the original analytical restrictions; and that this is a fair and legitimate deduction from the foregoing ex- amination, I think no person who enters into it with unbiassed judgement, will be disposed to deny. Belfast, May 7th, 1836. LXXXIX. On the History of the Condensation of the Gases, in reply to Dr. Davy, introduced by some Remarks on that of Electro-magnetic Rotation. By Micuart Farapay, Esq., D.C.L. F.RS., §c., in a Letter to Richard Phillips, Esq., F.RS. L.& E., &c. : My pear Sir, Royal Institution, May 10, 1836. | HAVE just concluded looking over Dr. Davy’s Life of his brother Sir Humphry Davy. In it, between pages 160 and 164 of the second volume, the author links together some account, with observations, of the discovery of electro-magnetic rotation, and that of the condensation of the gases, concluding at page 164 with these words: “I am surprised that Mr. Fa- raday has not come forward to do him [Sir Humphry Davy] justice. As I view the matter, it appears hardly less necessary to his own honest fame than his acknowledgement to Dr. Wollaston, on the subject of the first idea of the rotary mag- netic motion.” I regret that Dr. Davy by saying this has made that neces- sary which I did not before think so; but I feel that I cannot after his observation indulge my earnest desire to be silent on the matter without incurring the risk of being charged with something cpposed to an honest character. ‘This I dare not risk ; but in answering for myself, I trust it will be understood that I have been driven unwillingly into utterance. Dr. Davy speaks of electro-magnetic rotation, and so also must I, for the purpose of showing certain coincidences in dates, &c. between the latter part of that affair and the con- densation of chlorine and the gases, &c. Oersted’s experi- ments were publised in Thomson’s Annals of Philosophy for October 1820, and from this, I believe, was derived the first knowledge of them which we had in this country. At all events it was the first intimation Sir Humphry Davy and I had of them, for he brought down the Number into the laboratory on the morning of its appearance (October Ist) and we re- 522 Mr. Faraday on the Condensation of the Gases, Sc. peated the experiments together. I may remark that this is aproof that Dr. Davy, in the Life* as well as elsewhere+, does not always understand the meaning of his brother’s words, and I think that he would never have written the lines which have driven me to the present and a former replyt if he had. Immediately upon Oersted’s great discovery, the subject was pursued earnestly, and various papers were written, amongst which is one by Sir Humphry Davy, Phil. Trans. 1821, page 7, read before the Royal Society Nov. 16, 1820, in which, at page 17, he describes the rolling of certain wires upon knife- edges, being attracted when the north pole of the magnet was presented under certain conditions of current, and repelled under certain other conditions of current, &c. Another paper was a brief statement by the Editor of the Quarterly Journal of Science, (Mr. Brande,) in which he an- nounces distinctly and clearly Dr. Wollaston’s view of the na- ture of the electro-magnetic force, and its circumferential cha- racter. It is in the tenth volume, p. $363, and may be dated according to the number of the Journal, Ist January 1821. Then there are my historical sketches in the Annals of Philosophy, N.S., vols. ii. and iii. written in July, August, and September 1821, and the paper describing my discovery of the electro-magnetic rotation dated 11th September 18218, and others; but we will pass on to that of Sir Humphry Davy, read 6th March 1823)|, which with its consequents is synchro- nous with the affair of the condensation of gases. ‘This is the paper which Dr. Davy says “he (Sir H. D.,) concludes by an act of justice to Dr. Wollaston, pointing out how the discovery of the rotations of the electro-magnetic wire round its axis by the approach of a magnet, realized by the inge- nuity of Mr. Faraday had been anticipated, and even at- tempted by Dr. Wollaston in the laboratory of the Royal Institution {”. I have elsewhere** done full justice to Dr. Wollaston on the point of electro-magnetic rotation, and have no desire to lessen the force of anything I have said, but would rather exalt it. But as Dr. Davy has connected it with the condensation of the gases, I must show the continual tendency to error which has occurred in both these matters. Dr. Davy, then, is in error when he says I realized Dr. Wollaston’s expectation ; nor does Sir Humphry Davy say what his brother imputes to him. I did not realize the rotations of the electro-magnetic wire * Vol.ii.p.143. + Lond. and Edinb. Phil. Mag., 1835, vol. vii. p. 340. t Ibid. p. 337. § Quarterly Journal of Science, vol. xii. p. 74. || Phil. Trans. 1823, p. 153. q Life, vol. ii, p. 160. ** Quarterly Journal, vol. xv. p. 288. Mr. Faraday on the Condensation of the Gases, Sc. 523 round its axis; that fact was discovered by M. Ampére, at a later date; and even after I had discovered the rotation of the wire round the magnet as a centre, and that of the magnet round the wire, I could not succeed in causing the wire to revolve on its own axis*. ‘The result which Wollaston very philosophically and beautifully deduced from his principles, and which he tried to obtain in the laboratory, was, that wires could be caused to roll, not by attraction and repulsion as had been effected by Davy+t, but by a tangential action, ac- cording to the principles which had been already made known to the public as his (Dr. W.’s) by Mr. Brandet. What Sir Humphry Davy says in his printed paper § is this: «¢ T cannot with propriety conclude without mentioning a cir- cumstance in the history of the progress of electro-magnetism which, though well known to many Fellows of this Society, has, I believe, never been made public, namely, that we owe to the sagacity of Dr. Wollaston the first idea of the possibility of the rotations of the electro-magnetic wire round its axis by the approach of a magnet; and I witnessed early in 1821 an unsuccessful experiment which he made to produce the effect in the laboratory of the Royal Institution.” This paper being read on the 6th of March 1823, was reported on the first of the following month in the Annals of Philosophy, N.S., vol. v. p- 304; the reporter giving altogether a different sense to what is conveyed by Sir Humphry Davy’s printed paper, and saying that “ had not an experiment on the subject made by Dr. W. in the laboratory of the Royal Institution, and wit- nessed by Sir Humphry failed, merely through an accident which happened to the apparatus, he would have been the dis- coverer of that phenomenon ||.” I have an impression that this report of the paper was first made known tome by Sir Humphry Davy himself, but afriend’s recollection makes me doubtful on this point: however, Sir Humphry, when first he adverted to the subject, told me it was inaccurate and very unjust; and advised me to draw up a contradiction which the Editor should insert the next month. I drew up a short note, and submitting it to Sir Humphry he altered it and made it what it appears in the May Number of the Annals of Philosophy, N.S. vol. v. page 391, as from the Editor, all the parts from “but writing only” to the end being Sir Humphry’s; and I have the manuscript in his hand-writing inserted as an illustration into my copy of Paris’s Life of Davy. * Quart. Journ. of Science, vol. xii. p. 79. + Phil. Trans. 1821, p.17. { Quart. Journ., vol. x. p. 363. § Phil. Trans. 1823, p. 158. || In justice to the reporter, I have sought carefully at the Rapal Sdciety’s for the original manuscript, being the paper which he heard read ; but it cannot be found in its place. 524 Mr. Faraday on the Condensation of the Gases, $c. The whole paragraph stands thus: ‘ *,.* We endeavoured last month to give a full report of the important paper commu- nicated by the President to the Royal Society on the 5th [6th] of March*; but writing only from memory, we have made two errors, one with respect to the rotation of the mercury not being stopped, but produced, by the approximation of the mag- net; the other in the historical paragraph in the conclusion, which, as we have stated it, is unjust to Mr. Faraday, and does not at all convey the sense of the author. We wish, therefore, to refer our readers forward to the original paper, when it shall be published, for the correction of these mistakes.—Zdzt.” From this collection of dates and documents any one may judge that I at all events was wyustly subject to some degree of annoyance, and they will be the more alive to this if they recollect that all these things were happening at the very time of the occurrence of the condensation of gases and its con- sequences, and during the time that my name was before the Royal Society as a candidate for its fellowship. Ido not believe that any one was wittingly the cause of this state of things, but all seemed confusion, and generally to my disad- vantage. For instance, this very paper of Sir Humphry Davy’s which contains the “ act of justice,” as Dr. Davy calls it, is en- titled, “On a new phenomenon of Electro-magnetism.” Yet what is electro-magnetic was not new, but merely another form of my rotation; and the mew phenomenon is purely electrical, being the same as that previously discovered by M. Ampere. As M. Ampére’s result is described for the first time in a paper of the date of the 4th of September 1822+, and Sir Humphry Davy’s paper was read as soon after as the 6th of March 18234, the latter probably did not know of the result which the former had obtained. To conclude this matter: in consequence of these and other circumstances, and the simultaneous ones respecting the con- densation of chlorine, I wrote the historical statement, to which Dr. Davy refers ||, in which, admitting everything that Dr. Wollaston had done, I claim and prove my right to the discovery of the rotations I had previously described. This paper before its publication I read with Dr. Wollaston; he examined the proofs which I have adduced at p. 291, and after he had made a few alterations which brought it into the state in which it is printed, expressed his satisfaction at the ar- guments and his approval of the whole. The copy I have pre- served, and I will now insert the most considerable and im- * So far is mine; the rest is Sir Humphry Davy’s. + Ann. de Chim., 1822, vol. xxi. p. 47. t Phil. Trans. 1823, p. 153. § Quarterly Journal of Science, vol. xv. p. 288. || Life, vol. ii. p. 146. bottom of the page. Mr. Faraday on the Condensation of the Gases, $c. 525 portant of Dr. Wollaston’s corrections as an illustration. At the end of the paragraph at the bottom of page 291, I had expressed the sense thus: ‘¢ But what I thought to be attraction and repulsion in August 1821, Dr. Wollaston long before per- ceived to be an impulsion in one direction only, and upon that knowledge founded his expectations.” This he altered to: * But what I thought to be attraction zo and repulsion from the wire in August 1821, Dr. Wollaston long before perceived to arise from a power not directed to or from the wire, but acting circum- Serentially round it as axis, and upon that knowledge founded his expectation.” The parts in Italics are in his hand-writing. With respect to the condensation of the gases, I have long ago done justice to those to whom it was really due, and now approach the subject again with considerable reluctance; for though I feel that there is some appearance of confusion, still I regret that Dr. Davy did not leave the matter as it stood. All my papers on the subject in the Transactions of the Royal Society had passed through the hands of Sir Humphry Davy, who had corrected them as he thought fit, and had presented them to that body. Again, all the facts that Dr. Paris has stated upon his own knowledge* are correct; he made that statement as his own voluntary act and without any previous communication with me, so that I think I might have been left in that silence which I so much desired. The facts of the case, as far as I know them, are these: In the spring of 1823, Mr. Brande was Professor of Chemistry, Sir Humphry Davy Honorary Professor of Chemistry, and I Chemical Assistant, in the Royal Institution. Having to give personal attendance on both the morning and afternoon che- mical lectures, my time was very fully occupied. Whenever any circumstance relieved me in part from the duties of my situation, I used to select a subject of research, and try my skill upon it. Chlorine was with me a favourite object, and having before succeeded in discovering new compounds of that element with carbon, I had considered that body more deeply, and resolved to resume its consideration at the first opportunity: accordingly, the absence of Sir Humphry Davy from town having relieved me from a part of the laboratory duty, I took advantage of the leisure and the cold weather and worked upon frozen chlorine, obtaining the results which are published in my paper in the Quarterly Journal of Science for the 1st of April 18234. On Sir Humphry Davy’s return to town, which I think must have been about the end of * Paris’s Life of Davy, pp. 390, 391, 392. t Vol. xv. p.71. 526 Mr. Faraday on the Condensation of the Gases, &c. February or the beginning of March, he inquired what I had been doing, and I communicated the results to him as far as I had proceeded, and said I intended to publish them in the Quarterly Journal of Science. It was then that he suggested to me the heating of the crystals in a closed tube, and [ pro- ceeded to make the experiment which Dr. Paris witnessed, and has from his own knowledge described*. I did not at that time know what to anticipate, for Sir Humphry Davy had not told me his expectations, and I had not reasoned so deeply as he appears to have done. Perhaps he left me unacquainted with them to try my ability. How I should have proceeded with the chlorine crystals without the suggestion I cannot now say, but with the hint of heating the crystals in a close tube ended for the time Sir Humphry Davy’s instructions to me, and I puzzled out for myself in the manner Dr. Paris describes, that the oil I had obtained was condensed chlorine. This is all very evident from the paper read to the Royal Society, though it may seem at first to stand opposed to the notes and papers that Sir Humphry Davy communicated in conjunction with and after mine. When my paper was written it was, ac- cording to a custom consequent upon our relative positions, submitted to Sir Humphry Davy, (as were all my papers for the Philosophical Transactions up to a much later period,) and he altered it as he thought fit. This practice was one of great kindness to me, for various grammatical mistakes and awkward expressions were from time to time thus removed which might else have remained. The passage at the commencement of the paper which I shall now quote was of Sir Humphry Davy’s writing, and in fact contains everything that, and perhaps rather more than, he had said to me: ‘* The President of the Royal Society having honoured me by looking at these conclusions, sug- gested, that an exposure of the substance to heat under pres- sure, would probably lead to interesting results; the following experiments were commenced at his request}.” I say “rather more,” because I believe pressure was not recurred to in our previous verbal communication. However, I proceeded to make the experiment, and was making it when Dr. Paris came into the laboratory as he has described, and my thoughts at that moment are embodied and expressed in my paper in the following words: “I at first thought that muriatie acid and euchlorine had been formed; then that two new hydrates of chlorine had been produced; but at last I sus~ * Paris’s Life, p. 391. ; 3 t om Trans, 1823, p. 160.,[or Phil. Mag., First Series, vol. xii, p. 413.— DIT. Mr. Faraday on the Condensation of the Gases, Sc. 527 pected that the chlorine had been entirely separated from the water by the heat, and condensed into a dry fluid by the mere pressure of its own abundant vapour*.” I then de- scribe an experiment entirely of my own, in which I proceed to verify this conjecture, and go on to say, “ presuming that I had now a right to consider the yellow fluid as pure chlo- rine in the liquid state, I proceeded to examine its properties, &c. &c.+” To this paper Sir Humphry Davy added a notet, in which he says, “In desiring Mr. Faraday to expose the hydrate of chlorine to heat in a closed glass tube§, it occurred to me that one of three things would happen; that it would become fluid as a hydrate; or that a decomposition of water would occur, and euchlorine and muriatic acid be formed; or that the chlo- rine would separate in a condensed state.” And thenhe makes the subject his own by condensing muriatic acid, and states that he had “‘requested” me, (of course as Chemical Assistant, ) “to pursue these experiments, and to extend them to all the gases which are of considerable density, or to any extent so- luble in water;” &c. This I did, and when he favoured me by requesting that I would write a paper on the results, I began it by stating “that Sir Humphry Davy did me the honour to request 1 would continue the experiments, which I have done under his general direction, and the following are some of the results already obtained:||” and this paper being im- mediately followed by one on the application of these liquids as mechanical agents, by Sir Humphry Davy 4, he says in it, ‘* One of the principal objects that I had in view in causing ex- periments to be made on the condensation of different gaseous bodies, by generating them under pressure, &c.” 1 certainly took up the subject of chlorine with the view of pursuing it as I could find spare time, and at the moments which remained to me after attending to the directions of my superiors. It however passed in the manner described into the hands of Sir Humphry Davy, and a comparison of the dates will readily show that I at least had no time of my own to pursue it. My original paper was published on the first of April 1823, that being the first number of the Quarterly Journal which could appear after the experiments had been made: but in the short time between the first experiment and the publication much that I have referred to had occurred, for * Phil. Trans. 1823, p. 162. + Ibid. p. 163. t Lbid., p. 164. § Observe, not “ to pm under pressure.” See my remarks in the pre- eeding page. Phil, Trans, 1823, p.189. [or Phil. Mag., First Series, vol. Ixii, p. 417. —Enir. } q] Ibid. p. 199. 528 Mr. Faraday on the Condensation of the Gases, §c. not only had I communicated my results to Sir Humphry Davy, and received from him the hint, but my paper on fluid chlorine had been read (13th of March), and his note also, of the same date, attached to it; and the Editor of the Quarterly Journal, Mr. Brande, had time prior to the printing of my original paper to attach a note to it stating the condensation of chlorine and muriatic acid, and expressing an expectation that several other gases would be liquefied by the same means*. On the 10th of April my paper on the condensation of several gases into liquids was read, on the 17th of April Sir Humphry Davy’s on the application of condensed gases as mechanical agents, and on the Ist of May his Appendix to it on the changes of volume produced by heat. I have never remarked upon or denied Sir Humphry Davy’s right to his share of the condensation of chlorine or the other gases; on the contrary, | think that I long ago did him full “ justice” in the papers themselves. How could it be other- wise? he saw and revised the manuscripts; through his hands they went to the Royal Society, of which he was President at the time; and he saw and revised the printer’s proofs. Al- though he did not tell me of his expectations when he suggested the heating the crystals in a closed tube, yet I have no doubt that he had them+; and though, perhaps, I regretted losing my subject, I was too much indebted to him for much previous kindness to think of saying that that was mine which he said was his. But observe (for my sake) that Sir Humphry Davy nowhere states that he told me what he expected, or contra- dicts the passages in the first paper of mine which describe my course of thought, and in which I claim the development of the actual results. All this activity in the condensing of gases was simultaneous with the electro-magnetic affair already referred to, and I had learned to be cautious upon points. of right and priority. When therefore [ discovered in the course of the same year that neither I nor Sir Humphry Davy had the merit of first condensing the gases, and especially chlorine, I hastened to perform what I thought right, and had great pleasure in spontaneously doing justice and honour to those who deserved * Quarterly Journal, vol. xv. p. 74. + I perceive in a letter to Professor Edmund Davy, published by Dr. Davy in the Life, vol. ii. p. 166, of the date of September 1, 1823, that Sir Humphry Davy said, “ The experiments on the condensation of the gases were made under my direction, and I had anticipated, theoretically, all the results.” It is evident that he considered the subject his own; but I am glad that here, as elsewhere, he never says that he had informed me of his expectations. In this Sir Humphry Davy’s negative, and Dr. Paris’s posi- tive, testimony perfectly agree. Mr. Charlesworth on the Crag of Suffolk, &c. 529 it*. I therefore published on the 1st of January of the fol- lowing year (1824) a historical statement respecting the lique- faction of gases+, the beginning of which is as follows: “* I was not awareat the time when I Jirst observed the lique- faction of chlorine gas, nor until very lately, that any of the class of bodies called gases had been reduced into the fluid form; but having during the last few weeks sought for in- stances where such results might have been afforded without the knowledge of the experimenter, I was surprised to find several recorded cases. I have thought it right, therefore, to bring these cases together, and only justice to endeavour to secure for them a more general attention than they appear as yet to have gained.” Amongst other cases the liquefaction of chlorine is clearly described}{. The value of this statement of mine has since been fully proved; for upon Mr. Northmore’s complaint ten years after, with some degree of reason, that great injustice had been done to him in the affair of the con- densation of gases, and his censure of “the conduct of Sir H. Davy, Mr. Faraday, and several other philosophers for with- holding the name of the first discoverer,” I was able by re- ferring to the statement to convince him and his friend that if ‘my papers had done him wrong, J at least had endeavoured also to do him right §. Believing that I have now said enough to preserve my own “honest fame” from any injury it might have risked from the mistakes of Dr. Davy, I willingly bring this letter to a close, and trust that I shall never again have to address you on the subject. I am, my dear Sir, yours, &c. Richard Phillips, Esq., &c. &c. M. Farapay. a XC. On the Crag of Suffolk, and on the Fallacies connected with the Method now usually employed Sor ascertaining the relative Age of Tertiary Deposits. By Epwarpv Cuar.es- worn, Esg., F.G.S. To the Editors of the Philosophical Magazine and Journal. GENTLEMEN, [X former communications I treated of the crag as a ter- tiary formation consisting of separate marine deposits, and * Monge and Clouet had condensed sulphurous acid probably befere the year 1800. Northmore condensed chlorine in the years 1805 and 1806. t Quarterly Journal of Science, vol. xvi. p- 229. t Lbid., p. 236. § Lond. & Edinb. Phil. Mag. 1834, vol. iv. p- 261, Third Series. Vol.8. No. 50, Supplement, June 1836. 3 H 530 Mr. Charlesworth on the Crag, and on ascertaining being desirous that the grounds upon which I have adopted - this opinion should be fairly placed before those to whom the geological history of our own island is an object of interest, I propose in the course of the following observations to enter more minutely into the merits of that question. An attempt has been made to explain the relation which the divisions of the crag bear to each other by assuming that the lower or coralline beds constitute the only original deposit, from which the rest of the fossiliferous strata above the Lon- don clay in Suffolk and the adjoining counties have been de- rived, by the operation of diluvial agents. It may perhaps appear hardly necessary to enter upon the refutation of a theory which is so irreconcilable with recorded facts, but as it is desirable that no stumbling block should lie in the way of future investigation, I shall advert to some of the points which are especially opposed to its reception. Until the subject was recently brought before the notice of the Geological Society, our available sources of local infor- mation respecting the crag and its organic remains were almost entirely confined to the published observations of Mr. R. C. Taylor and Mr. Samuel Woodward, the former of whom had paid great attention to the tertiary deposits of Norfolk and _ Suffolk, and to whose exertions, I believe, we are indebted for the first list of their characteristic fossils. I might, per- haps, reasonably inquire how far the diluvial character as- signed to the red crag is consistent with the results attending my own personal investigation. For the present, however, I am anxious that your attention should be drawn to several passages occurring in the works of the above-named writers, and which are certainly calculated to throw some light upon the point at issue if the matter be really one requiring elu- cidation. Mr. Taylor’s interesting memoir on the geology of Eastern Norfolk was published in 1827, but his range of observation was by no means limited to the particular district which he there professes to describe. We find, however, no allusion to the Ramsholt stratum, although he had evidently extended his researches into the adjoining county and explored the coral reefs of Aldborough and Orford. A circumstance which ap- pears to have particularly arrested the attention of Mr. Taylor during his investigation of the crag was the natural distribution of its fossil Testacea, the occurrence of which he points out in that part of the formation which we have lately been informed “‘is decidedly diluoium or disrupted crag.” At page 15, he remarks, ‘‘it is characteristic of the shells and other organic bodies deposited with the crag, that they are by no means dif- the relative Age of Tertiary Deposits. 5381 fused in equal numbers and proportions throughout, but occur at intervals in groups and genera. Thus at Cromer the pre- dominant and remarkable shells are Mactre; at Runton, Car- dia; nearer Clay, Murex striatus; at Bawdesey cliff, Murex reversus and Pectunculus; at the Beacon, Venus equalis; at Fe- lixstow, Pectunculus and Voluta Lamberti; south of Landguard cottage, Murex contrarius and Mya lata; at Bramerton and near Norwich are Murex striatus, Telling, and Balani.” There is no reference here made to Ramsholt, Sudbeurn, or Ald- borough; all the localities named in the above extract are those of the red or dilwvial crag. At page 23, Mr. Taylor observes, “ that after the forma- tion of the chalk the waters deposited the marine exuviee, and gave existence during the long period in which they occupied that portion of its former surface to those remarkable accumu- lations of crag shells which we now witness.” And again, at page 29: “ A district bordering a hundred miles upon our eastern coast is occupied by an ancient marine deposit. ...... at one point exhibiting groups of shell-fish allied to those of the neighbouring sea, and at another composed of numerous ge- nera which are neither to be recognised living in any part of our globe or assimilated to the fossil shells of other forma- tions.” . I need not pursue Mr. Taylor’s views any further, but would refer the reader to his work or to his previous papers in the Philosophical Magazine. The above quotations fur- nish ample proof that he had not discovered the diluvial na- ture of the red crag, although it was that part of the forma- tion with which he was so intimately acquainted. In 1833, Mr. Samuel Woodward published an outline of the Geology of Norfolk, in which we are presented with a brief notice of the crag, confirming the previous observations made by Mr. Taylor. At page 19, Mr. W. mentions that “the crag district is a narrow tract running southward from the coast between Cromer and Weybourn, and passing’ Norwich in its progress towards the Suffolk coast, the great deposit of this formation.” Mr.) Woodward, without suspecting that the deposit which he is describing is déliviwm, proceeds to re- mark that “this tract appears to us to have been an estu in the antediluvian period... .. -Viewing the thick beds of testaceous remains, we cannot hesitate to admit that the sea occupied for a long period the part of Norfolk now under con- sideration.” Again, at page 21: Another point worthy of attention is the apparent agreement in the gregarious habits of the original occupiers of ae shells with the recent Mollusca, confining 83H2 532 Mr. Charlesworth on the Crag, and on ascertaining them to particular spots or habitats; thus we find that the beds of crag shells are not continuous but deposited in patches; and that the shells in the Suffolk beds are in numerous in- stances generically and in almost all specifically different to those found near Norwich.” No traces of the coralline cra have yet been detected in the county of Norfolk; it should therefore be borne in mind that the above observations refer solely to the upper deposit. We are here furnished with the clearest evidence that Messrs. Woodward and Taylor agree in one important par- ticular; viz. that the fossils of the red crag are not promis- cuously jumbled together, but localized very much in the same manner as the Mollusca inhabiting our present seas: both geo- logists also infer from the great accumulation of these fossils that the ocean must for a long time have remained stationary over that district in which they occur. In order then to maintain the decisions in reference to this subject which [appeared in your Number for November, it will be necessary either to dispute the accuracy of the facts now adduced, or to show that this gregarious distribution of ge- nera and species may exist in a formation resulting from those operations which we designate by the term diluvial. I will- ingly admit that the views of geologists as to the real na- ture of these operations are not of the most definite charac- ter, and at the present time our opinions respecting the true origin of what are called diluvial deposits are undergoing im- portant modifications; but allowing the utmost latitude for any discordance of this kind, I apprehend that it will require more than ordinary ingenuity to show that the conditions which prevailed at the time when the formation of the crag was going forward can in any way be approximated to that state of things which is generally understood to be the ne- cessary concomitant of diluvial action. Those who are at all familiar with the geology of Nor- folk, cannot fail to have observed that the crag, in common with other formations, has been subjected to the abrasion of diluvial currents. Mr. Taylor remarks that * portions pro- bably from its western edges have been swept away. Their fragments mingled with those of the chalk and preceding formations, piled in enormous heaps, form the cliffs of Cro- mer and Trimmingham, 250 or 300 feet in thickness upon the original crag which rests in situ at their base.” I imagine that it would not greatly increase the reputation of any geological observer to infer the diluvial origin of the Norfolk chalk, because its fragments in the shape of detritus occur in the cliffs at Cromer ; but a precisely analogous fact has the relative Age of Tertiary Deposits. 533 been brought forward to support a similar opinion regarding the upper division of the crag. A small series of shells which I had collected at Ramsholt were placed by Mr. Lyell in the hands of M. Deshayes, for the purpose of ascertaining his opinion with regard to the pro- portion of extinct species. The conclusion he came to was that the per centage of recent shells was the same as in the larger collection, which he had examined when preparing his tables on tertiary fossils, and which were probably obtained from the upper bed. It is in allusion to this circumstance that a correspondent observes, “If such be the fact, there is an end to the question between my opponent and myself.” Now, the questions which have been under discussion are the presence of corallines in the Ramsholt bed, and the diluvial na- ture of the red crag. To decide these disputed points by sim- ply ascertaining the per centage of extinct species in the shells of the coralline crag, can only have been effected by a course of induction as novel in its nature as the results which it evolves are important; nor shall I stand alone in anxiously anticipating further information upon the application of a principle, which in some instances may so materially assist the labours of the geologist while prosecuting the investigation of tertiary for- mations. I turn however from the consideration of this subject, which is almost devoid of interest from its not having assumed a form that entitles it to serious discussion, to enter upon an in- quiry far more comprehensive in its nature and requiring a more profound method of investigation ;—an inquiry replete with the highest interest, from the practical suggestions which it offers, and still more so in the field which it throws open for legitimate inductive speculation. I have on a previous occasion dwelt upon the features which separate the coralline crag from the tertiary strata with which itis connected. The novelty of its general aspect, lithological character, and organic remains when contrasted with the ad- jacent fossiliferous beds cannot be disputed. But the ques- tion may fairly be asked, what is the nature of these changes, and what are the conclusions to be drawn from them? Do they accord with those well-known phenomena which are supposed to register the lapse of ages; or may they not rather be attributed to certain alterations in physical condition, which. over a small area may materially affect the existing organiza- tion during a comparatively short ‘period ? I am aware that Mr. Lyell in the last edition of his Prin- ciples of Geology refers the red and the coralline crag to the 534 Mr. Charlesworth on the Crag, and on ascertaining same period, from the number of fossils which are common to the two deposits, and this opinion he has subsequently con- firmed in the Anniversary Address recently delivered to the Fellows of the Geological Society. In a former memoir, when describing the stratum at Rams- holt, the opinion I stated was that it formed part of a de- posit, older, geologically speaking, than those shelly strata above it with which geologists were already familiar. Subse- quent consideration has tended to strengthen the views which I then advocated, and my object at present is that of testing the importance of those facts which are supposed by some to identify the coralline beds with the other fossiliferous strata. During the summer of 1835, I entered upon a more minute examination of those localities in which the inferior portion of the crag is most advantageously exposed, and my investiga- tion has been attended with results of a highly gratifying and satisfactory nature. I have procured from Ramsholt every species of coral that has yet been obtained from the more ex- tensive excavations at Aldborough and Orford; while above the coral reefs, which occupy so large a portion of the latter district, I have succeeded in discovering the upper deposit, still retaining those well-marked peculiarities which form a striking contrast to the inferior stratum, and from which even the yet unpractised observer would as naturally separate it as he would the beds of the coralline crag from the London clay on which they repose. My anticipations on this subject have therefore been completelyrealized, and the true geological posi- tion of the Orford crag may now be considered fully established. The relative position and lithological character of the red crag would during a late period of inquiry have probably as- signed it a distinct place in a geological series, and under some circumstances the geologist undoubtedly derives considerable assistance in the classification of fossiliferous deposits from a careful observation of these phenomena. To guide our deter- mination in the instance before us, in addition to these sources we have thrown open to our inspection an extensive series of organic remains; it is from their examination that my own opinions have principally been formed, and it now remains for me to show how far they can be justified. j With this view I shall take a cursory survey of the organic remains at present discovered in the tertiary strata which over- lie the London clay in Suffolk and the chalk in Norfolk. In the coralline crag we find few indications of the exist- ence of vertebrated animals; such as are met with belong ex- clusively to the class of Fish; but the nature of this deposit ap- pears to have been by no means well calculated for the pre- the relative Age of Tertiary Deposits. 535 servation of their remains. ‘The only bones of frequent oc- currence are those placed within the cavity of the tympanum, and which being of a more solid texture than the rest of the skeleton are found in a very perfect state. These bones belong to an unknown genus, and are peculiar to this part of the crag formation. Teeth of cartilaginous species are occasionally met with, but in the course of my own researches I have never suc~ ceeded in obtaining them. The ocean, however, which deposited the red crag was one evidently swarming with fish; and their mineralized remains, generally consisting of the teeth and portions of the palate, are preserved in great abundance. Among them are the ge- nera Carcharias, Myliobates, Galeus, Lamna, Notidanus, and Platax, &c. Wherever this deposit is detected, some of these genera invariably accompany it. Itis here also that we first meet with the higher orders of the animal kingdom. The teeth of the Mastodon, Elephant, Hippopotamus, and other Mammalia are deposited with the Mollusca of this period, and in addition to them I may mentioned the bones of Birds, which I have recently obtained from several localities. Turning from the groups of vertebrated animals to those of the Radiata, we naturally revert to that extensive assem- blage of Polypifera which characterize so large a portion of the coralline crag, and to which nothing analogous is pre- sented by any other tertiary deposit in this island. ‘The Echinide too, so sparingly distributed in the London clay and upper beds of the crag, are here met with in compa- rative abundance; fragments and spines are of constant oc- currence, and some of the more perfect specimens which have been obtained exhibit the most elegant forms, and are widely removed from known species. ‘There are one or two spots in the red crag where Echini have congregated in myriads, but the species approximate more nearly to those now exist- ing, and with which they may perhaps be identified. The com- parison of the Crustacea from the two beds has furnished a corresponding result; but the remains of this group are spa- ringly met with, and generally in an unfavourable state for ex- amination. I now proceed to notice that class which among organized beings are thought to furnish the geologist with the most im- portant data in his investigation of tertiary formations, and to which he especially directs his attention when fossiliferous strata of different periods are superposed in the same area, or when he is desirous of ascertaining the probable epoch to which an isolated deposit should be referred. Mr. Searles V. Wood, who possesses the largest series extant 536 Mr. Charlesworth on the Crag, and on ascertaining of British tertiary fossils,states that he has collected 450 species of shells from the crag: of these more than 200 were peculiar to the coralline, 80 peculiar to the upper bed, and 150 were found in both deposits. Before any conclusions are drawn from this statement, it is of the utmost importance to bear in mind the circumstances under which the fossils of one formation may, by the natural process of degradation, have been imbedded in another. I have before alluded to the fact of secondary shells occurring in the red crag where that deposit is in contact with the chalk; and if causes similar to those now in action were operating at eras antecedent to the present, there is nothing to excite our surprise in this phenomenon. I have been particularly struck with the appearance presented by the fossils in those remark- able masses of transported or protruded chalk which are seen on the beach for a few miles east of Cromer. Many of these enormous fragments are half buried in the stratum of blue clay forming the beach, to which level the elevated portion is by the action of the tides gradually reduced. A platform of chalk is thus formed, which is frequently studded in every di-+ rection with Belemnites and Terebratule. As its surface wears away the fossils are brought out in relief, and at length being entirely removed are deposited with the recent Mollusca. The point principally deserving notice here is the introductien of these fossils into the present deposits completely detached from the matrix in which they were imbedded, and which being re- moved in a finely divided state, would not at a future period be recognised in the form under which it formerly existed. The secondary shells in the crag of Norfolk have probably been removed from their original bed by a process similar to that just described. We see no indications of a more violent operation ; there are no nodules of chalk accompanying the fossils, which are themselves so completely freed from an adherent matrix that they can only be distinguished from the more recent Mollusca with which they are associated by an attention to specific distinctions, and by the chalk locked up within the cavity of the bivalves. At the time the formation of the red crag was going for- ward, the surface of the chalk to a great extent was protected from abrasion by overlying deposits, and wherever this was the case the superior stratum would be the one exposed to denudation, and from which organic remains would be trans- ported. In this way, undoubtedly, have the fossils of the co- ralline crag, along with those of the chalk, been introduced into a more recent deposit, and the difficulty is now to ascer- tail the probable amount of admixture. Connected with this the relative Age of Tertiary Deposits. 537 subject there is one circumstance which should not be passed over without consideration: supposing that the disturbing forces were acting with equal intensity over the area of chalk and coralline crag, the effect produced, so far as regards the removal of fossils, would be regulated by their abundance and by the nature of the deposit in which they were imbedded. If, as is really the fact, we find in the red crag six or eight per cent. of fossils belonging to the chalk, we may reasonably infer the presence of a much larger number derived from the coral- line beds. Were we to discover fossil shells carried down to the delta of a river the course of which flowed over an equal area of chalk and crag, we should naturally expect that the majority of these transported fossils would belong to the latter formation. The numerical statements drawn up by Mr. Wood have been made without any reference to the conditions under which a large number of the same fossils have been disco- vered in the two deposits. However abundant or naturally grouped a shell may occur in the coralline crag, one solitary specimen of that species, or even a fragment having been de- tected in the upper bed, at once places it on the list of those which are spoken of as common to the two formations; under these circumstances, and taking intoconsideration the probable extent to which the coralline beds have been broken up, I am only surprised that there should be so large a number as 200 species which are only found in them and have not yet been observed in the rest of the formation. There are however some Mollusca which are either naturally localized, or occur in the same abundance in both divisions of the crag formation; and setting aside the fallacies which may arise from our erroneous identification of species, we are at liberty to infer from these the probable approximation of the two deposits. It appears, however, that a very large proportion of species may be continued through distinct and very remote geological epochs, for on referring to the tables of M. Des- hayes, we find that there are not less than 40 per cent. of species common to the crag and to the formations at this time in progress round the British islands. Mr. Lyell, when speaking of the newer pliocene formations, observes in vol. iii., page 54, °¢ It will be seen that of two hun- dred and twenty-six species found in the Sicilian beds only ten are of extinct or unknown species, although the antiquity of these tertiary deposits as contrasted with our most remote historical zeras is immensely great. In the volcanic and sedi- mentary strata of the district round Naples, the proportion appears to be even still smaller,” 538 Sir W. R. Hamilton’s Theorem connected with the It seems then that if instead of 20 or 30 there were 95 per cent. of species common to the red and coralline crag, even then these deposits might be as widely separated as the Sicilian tertiary strata and the formations of the present period ! I have yet to enter upon the most important stage of the present inquiry, that which relates to M. Deshayes’s examina- tion of the coralline crag shells, and to the consideration of how far the result affects the opinion I formerly advanced respecting the antiquity of the Ramsholt stratum. During the last two or three years I have embraced every opportunity of examining the marine and freshwater deposits in the counties of Norfolk, Essex, and Suffolk, and of late my attention has been particularly directed to those views of chronological arrangement which in so comprehensive and elaborate a manner are advocated in the ‘ Principles of Geology.’ From facts which have fallen under my own notice during the course of my investigation, and from other circumstances which have more recently transpired,] feel con- fident that a classification of the fossiliferous strata in ques- tion, founded upon the proportion of extinct Mollusca which they individually contain, would lead to the most erroneous conclusions. The sources of error which I have in the present instances detected, will, if clearly established, have a general application in the arrangement of tertiary formations, and will probably materially interfere with the confidence which we might other- wise place in the accuracy of those results which are con- nected with numerical calculations. To enter upon a full discussion of this most intéresting and complicated subject would greatly exceed the limits of the present communication, and I shall therefore confine myself to those points which are particularly connected with the present inquiry. [To be continued.] XCI. Theorem respecting Algebraic Elimination, connected with the Question of the Possibility of resolving in finite Terms the general Equation of the Fifth Degree. Extracted by Permission, from a Communication recently made to the Royal Irish Academy. By Professor Sir Witt1am Rowan Hamitton, Astronomer Royal of Ireland*. Theorem. [= x be eliminated between two equations, of the following forms, namely, 1st, an equation of the fifth degree, of the form = r+Der — E, Sec eneceruesesesee (1.) * Communicated by the Author. Question of solving the Equation of the Fifth Degree. 539 in which the roots are supposed to be all unequal, and the coefficients D and E to be, both of them, different from 0, and, 2nd, an equation of the form ep = Oa + F(a), \sennsvsieneceansiann (2.) in which f (x) denotes any rational function of x, whether in- tegral or fractional, M! 2! + M"2*" + &e. J (2) = , xz x! 3 eeeecsece (3.) K’2* + K"2* + &e. and if, in the result of this elimination, which will always be an equation of the fifth degree in y, of the form 0= PLA Y4BD P4+CY+4D' y+E, «.. (4.) we suppose that the coefficients are such as to satisfy, znde- pendently of Q, the second as well as the first of the two con- ditions Be! Ose WHO Silasctgapnciss Sasa » (5.) in virtue of the values of the constants MM’, MY, on tly polly woe K/, KY, wee 2t'y 20!', wee vee (6.) in the rational function f(z); Isay that then those constants (6.) must be such as to admit of our reducing that rational function to the form SF (2) = Ge+(2?+Dx+E). 9 (@), occoee (7.) g being some new constant, and ¢ (x) being some new rational function of x, which does not contain the polynome 2°+ Dx +E as a divisor. Demonstration.—Let 2x, %22%3%4%; denote the five roots of the equation (1.), which are supposed to be all unequal among themselves, and different from 0; and let us put for abridge- ment fle) — fe) =h | F (#2) — 2S (2s) = as | Fes) — F(x) = Ie» F seseonneetennan (8.) F(t) =F (ts) = has | LE) = 4 Q+9=Q. | 540 Sir W. R. Hamilton’s Theorem connected with the We shall then have fm) =4t+7%, S (®o) = figt 725 f (U3) = Ag+ %35f (24) — hy+q X49 S (4s) i 7X59 e@ecvceoce (9.) and the result (4.) of the elimination of « between the equations (1.) and (2.), may be expressed as follows : 0 = (y-Q’ #,—hy) (y—Q! x.—hg) (y—Q! x3—hs) (y—Q’ xy—hy) (Y—Q’! 5). seveeneee (102) Comparing (10.) with (4.), and observing that the form of the equation (1.) gives the relations oO = Ly PLgoALst+ Xyt 255 erecsvece (11.) O = By otha Ug t%3 Xyt%yUyt+%5 2, HX Pet ly Lyb Myst Hy LAH; Wyy eevee (12.) O H 2 XX yHXqg Ug Uy 3 Uy U5 TX Xs Uy +25 2 Lo 4H, Ug ¥y+ Xo LL +Hy Us XU, +H, H, Let Xe XyXyzy (138.) we easily find these expressions for A’ and C’, namely, A! — (hi thgthz+h,) 5 eoecesccccee (14) and C= — Q? (hv thy xg ths xg + hy ry) +Q! hy hg (x +X) +h hg (x +23) + hy hy (ay +24) \ thighs (q+ 3) thigh, (&o + 4) thy hg (%3 +24) — (Ay highs +h, hghy+hy hg hythg hz hg) severe (15.) If, then, the coefficient C’, as well as A’, is to vanish inde- pendently of Q, and consequently of Q’, we must have the four following equations : = hth ths+hy; Peco eee res see ser ees eernes ose (16.) 0 = har thy re ths ay t+hy tgs cevvesecseeeeee (17) 0 = hy hy (4, +X_) +h hy (x, +3) +h, hy (2, +4) thighs (%q+ a3) +hohg (@o+a4) +h hy (x3+%4)3 (18.) 0 = Ay hghsthyhghythy hghythghghy3 serve (19.) which give, by elimination of ,, 0 = hy, (wP—a2P) +h (x—aP) +hs(xy—xy), — (20-) 0 = ha, the xoths x34 (hithgths)? x45 (21.) O = hathy) (hg +h) (hy tha) + ceveveccecceceeeseeee (22.) Of the three factors of the last of these equations, it is mani- festly indifferent which we employ ; since the conclusions which can be drawn from the consideration of any one of these three factors can also be drawn from the consideration of either of the other two, by merely interchanging two of the three roots 21 X_ Xz, without altering the other of those three roots, or Question of solving the Equation of the Fifth Degree. 541 the two remaining roots x, x, of the equation (1.). We shall therefore take the first of the three factors of (22.), namely, the equation O = hgthys cseccccccee coveceese (23.) which reduces the two equations (20.) and (21.) to the two following, obtained by elimination of /,, 0 = hy (xP —axP) +h, (xe?—aX537) 5 veeeee (24) Oe. fiy2 (a, 4074) ehg® (hg ai) om sonore (2s) These two last equations give, by elimination of /,, O = h,?(x1+24){ (41+ x4)(%1— 24)? + (®q + %3)(%g—H3)"} 5 (26-) in which we cannot suppose the factor x,-+., to vanish, be- cause the relations oo #£°+D2,+E, 0) =2'+Da,+k, (27.) give D = —(a+a%a,+e7x2+a, oye 28.) B= (x, +24) (v,7+247) x, 245 : and we have supposed that E does not vanish; and since, for a similar reason, we cannot suppose that x,+.3 vanishes, we see that we must conclude h,=0, 4,=0, hk; = 0, hy = 0, (29.) unless we can suppose that the third factor of (26.) vanishes, that is, unless (a, +24) (@1— 24) + (Xo +23) (2-43) = 0. — (30.) Let us then examine into the meaning of this last condition, and the circumstances under which it can be satisfied. If we put, for abridgement, Lot Lz = —a, X v3 = Bs Secvceces (31.) the condition (30.) will become 0 = «f—a2) 1,—2,2°+r3—8+40 8; (32.) and we shall have, in virtue of the relations (11.) (12.) (13.), two other equations between x,, 7,, a, 6, namely, 0 = P44, (x,—a)+x7—2,0a+0°—B8, (33.) and 0 = rp—xr ata, (a*—6)—a?+2aB; eee (34.) between which three equations, (32.) (33.) (34.), we shall now proceed to eliminate v, and 2,. For this purpose we may begin by multiplying (33.) by 2,, and adding the product to (32.); a process which gives, by (34), 0 = rP—4742, 44+2342AB, secoseeee (35.) a relation more simple than (32.). In the next place we may 542 Sir W. R. Hamilton’s Theorem connected with the observe that, in general, the result of elimination of any vari- able 2 between any two equations of the forms O=p tq xt x®t+s' a? ace fhe? $rhet . \ (36.) is Oo= g 73! f qr? —2p! r pl’? +p y! gi? r+! s’ plig! x —p! sl! gr ate q' 2 pl! rll? ¢/ r! pl’ gq''r!—2 q' 3 gl 2” +g! sg! q/? peg? aly!!! sf yt! 9g! tof Age, ncemanvscecwvcccesces (37.) Applying this general formula to the elimination of x, between the equations (35.) and (33.), and making, for that purpose, p = 234+2e8, ¢ = —2,4 7 = 0, si 1, 38 p’ = xf— xata—B, YJ =a,—a, =], ake? we find, after some easy reductions, O = 42,°—42,)5 a+a,* (8 &—68)+2,? (—8a2 +140 8) +a,° (6 at*—120° B43 6°) +2, (—20°47 a3 B—7 a B*) +a5—7 a* B+13 a? 3° — 33; Soe oer oeseesoosovecevecs (39.) which is easily reduced by (34.) to the form = v,°(2a'—206+(*)+a,(20°—7 a? B+a 8°) +a5&—3 ap +5.a* 8? — 6, eceeeene eervneeeeeos (40.) Again, applying the same general formula (37.) to the elimi- nation of x, between the equations (34.) and (40.), by making now p! = —H+4+22 8, g = @?—B, w= —a, J = 1, p= a&& —3 aA B45 0° BP —P, g”=2a°—7 a B+ 1,7” >(41.) =2a'—2¢° B+/*, we find after reductions, 0 = 25 a8—250 a6 84975 a f° —1850 a'* BF 41725 a B*—700 uw 654100 a8 BS ... (42) that is, (jes —— 25 af (a°—2 B)? (a4 —3 a B+ 2°). weevce (43.) But this condition cannot be satisfied, consistently with the suppositions which we have already made that neither D nor E vanishes; because, by expressions similar to (28.), we have D = —(a'—3 2° 6+"), E= —aB(#*—2 8). (44) We must therefore reject the supposition (30.), and adopt the only other alternative, namely, (29.); and hence we have, by (9.) S(%) = q &yy F(X) = JXoy f (x3) = 7 Xs SF (4) = 7X45 (25 — G Use eeeeeaeeseee ( 5.) Question of solving the Equation of the Fifth Degree. 543 In this manner we find, that, under the circumstances sup- posed in the enunciation of the theorem, the function J (x)—ge vanishes, for every value of x which makes the polynome x°+D2+E vanish; and since these values have been sup- posed unequal, we must have, therefore, SJ (@)—qe = (#°+De2+E). (x), ....... (46.) the function ($ x) being rational, like f(x), and not containing x2°+D2+E as a divisor; which was the thing to be proved. Corollary. It is evident that, under the circumstances above supposed, the coefficients B! D! E! of (4.) will be ex- pressed as follows: BS OP Ca ey Ore eee. (47.) that is, the equation of the 5th degree in y will be of the form 0 = 7+Q*Dy+Q°E. ...... vows (48.) At the same time the relation between y and «x will reduce itself, by (2.) and (7.), to the form y = Ucrt(2?+Dx+E). 9 (x), ...... (49.) Q still denoting Q+g. If, then, we were to establish this . additional supposition Dh ei BERT. Sb altiducets 0 GD in order to complete the reduction of (4.) to De Moivre’s solvible form, we should have that is, GY ess Pyitracalita oes, otste sewee (52) the equation of the fifth degree in y would become Gt, rh leahann ch tnighen ah prarmetbanl sks (53.) and the relation between y and x would become ¥y =(P +DrtE).¢ G3 «2-0 (54.) and thus, although the equation in y would indeed be easily solvible, yet it would entirely fail to give any the least assistance towards resolving the proposed equation of the fifth degree in 2. Observatory, Dublin, May 15, 1836. [ 544 ] XCII. Reviews, and Notices respecting New Books. The Principles of Hydrostatics. By Thomas Webster, M.A., of Trinity College, Cambridge. 1835. The Theory of the Equilibrium and Motion of Fluids. By the same Author. Cambridge, 1836. N the Preface to the first of these works Mr. Webster states that he has ‘¢ endeavoured to develop the principles of the science of Hydro- statics with the use of none but the most elementary mathematics ; so that the student, who now either partially or wholly neglects this beautiful branch of natural philosophy from the uninviting character which analysis presents, to those who are not familiar with it, may at once proceed to its study if he is only acquainted with the first prin- ciples of algebra and mechanics. It is not from thinking other me- thods preferable or even comparable with the analytical that I have adopted this plan, but with the view of bringing the subject within the reach of those who have not been initiated in analysis.” By pur- suing this plan the author has produced a work of more general utility: than if he had introduced more analytics, since many that might not have ability or inclination to follow a train of reasoning conducted by mathematical symbols, would take interest in and receive benefit from an exposition of the principles on which such reasoning may be founded, and by a statement of facts and results. Besides which, the nature of the work admits of the introduction of subjects which in the present state of science do not admit of exact mathematical treatment, and which are nevertheless fully as useful in a practical point of view, or instructive as branches of natural philosophy, as many of. those that do, These subjects are, Steam and its applica- tions ; the mechanical application of the Motion of Fluids ; Dalton’s law of the diffusion of Gases coexisting in the same space ; Winds ; Trade Winds ; Evaporation; Theory of Rain, &c., which will be found’ to be clearly and concisely treated in this work. It adds, however, to the confidence we place in works of this description to know that they are written by mathematicians. Mr. Webster establishes a claim to being considered such by the able manner in which the se- cond of the above-named treatises is composed, which is purely ma- thematical, being intended to carry the student to the highest analy- tical deductions from the first principles of hydrostatics and hydrody- namics that could be prudently introduced into an elementary work. Accordingly, besides the usual propositions, treated for the most part in the usual manner, there is additional matter on subjects that have scarcely yet acquired a standing in elementary treatises, viz. Laplace’s Theory of Capillary Attraction, Specific Heat, and the Law of Cool- ing, in the statical part; aerial vibrations and their propagation, considerd as the immediate causes of sound, together with musical vibrations in cylindrical tubes, in the dynamical part. In these por- tions of the work Mr. Webster has drawn largely from recent me- moirs both of foreigners and our own countrymen, and has endea- voured to make their productions more accessible to the mathematical student by breaking up the simpler parts into distinct propositions. Royal Society. 545 As these subjects are inferior to few in the interest that attaches to them, and would be more generally attended to if the mathematical calculation by which the reasoning in most of them is necessarily conducted could be simplified, any attempt, like that in the work before us, to do this, is deserving of our approbation. XCIII. Proceedings of Learned Societies. ROYAL SOCIETY. 1836. PAPER was read, “ On an artificial Substance resem- Feb, 25.— bling Shell; by Leonard Horner, Esq., F.R.S. L. and Ed.: with an account of the examination of the same; by Sir David Brewster, K.H., LL.D., F.R.S., &c.”’ The author, having noticed a singular incrustation on both the in- ternal and external surfaces of a wooden dash-wheel, used in bleach- ing, at the Cotton Factory of Messrs. J. Finlay and Co., at Catrine, in Ayrshire, instituted a minute examination of the properties and composition of this new substance. He describes it as being compact in its texture, of a brown colour, and highly polished surface, with a metallic lustre, and presenting in some parts a beautiful iridescent appearance: when broken, it exhibits a foliated structure. Its ob- vious resemblance, in all these respects, to many kinds of shell, led the author to inquire into its intimate mechanical structure, and into the circumstances of its formation. He found, by chemical analysis, that it was composed of precisely the same ingredients as shell ; namely, carbonate of lime and animal matter. The presence of the former was easily accounted for ; as the cotton cloths which are placed in the compartments of the wheel, in order that they may be tho- roughly cleansed by being dashed against its sides, during its rapid revolutions, have been previously steeped and boiled in lime water, But it was more difficult to ascertain the source of the animal matter; this, however, was at length traced to the small portion of glue, which, in the factory where the cloth had been manufactured, was employed as an ingredient in forming the paste, or dressing, used to smooth and stiffen the warp before it is put into the loom. These two ma- terials, namely lime and gelatine, being present in the water in a state of extreme division, are deposited very slowly by evaporation; and thus compose a substance which has a remarkable analogy to shell, not only in external appearance, and even pearly lustre, but also in its internal foliated structure, and which likewise exhibits the same optical properties with respect to double refraction and polarizing powers. A letter from Sir David Brewster, to whom the author had sub- mitted for examination various specimens of this new substance, is subjoined ; giving an account of the results of his investigations of its mechanical and optical properties. He found that it is composed of laminz, which are sometimes separated by vacant spaces, and at others, only slightly coherent; though generally adhering to each Third Series. Vol, 8. No. 50, Supplement. June 1836, 31 546 Royal Society. other with a force greater than that of the lamine of sulphate of lime, or of mica ; but less than those of calcareous spar. When the ad- hering plates are separated, the internal surfaces are sometimes co- lourless, especially when these surfaces are corrugated or uneven ; but they are almost always covered with an iridescent film of the most brilliant and generally uniform tint, which exhibits all the va- riety of colours displayed by thin plates or polarizing lamine. This substance, like most crystallized bodies, possesses the property of refracting light doubly ; and, as in agate and mother-of-pearl, one of the two images is perfectly distinct, while the other contains a con- siderable portion of nebulous light, varying with the thickness of the plate, and the inclination of the refracted ray. Like calcareous spar, it has one axis of double refraction, which is negative ; and it gives, by polarized light, a beautiful system of coloured rings. It belongs to the rhombohedral system, and, as in the Chaux carbonatée basée of Haiiy, the axis of the rhombohedron, or that of double refraction, is perpendicular to the surface of the thin plates. As mother-of-pearl has, like arragonite, two axes of double refraction; this new sub- stance may be regarded as having the same optical relation to cal- careous spar that mother-of-pearl has to arragonite. The flame of a candle, viewed through a plate of this substance, presents two kinds of images; the one bright and distinct, the others faint and nebulous, and having curvatures, which vary as the incli- nation of the plate is changed: the two kinds being constituted by oppositely polarized pencils of light. On investigating the cause of these phenomena, Sir David Brewster discovered it to be the imper- fect crystallization of the substance ; whence the doubly refracting force separates the incident light into two oppositely polarized pen- cils, which are not perfectly equal and similar. In this respect, in- deed, it resembles agate, mother-of-pearl, and some other substances ; but it differs from all other bodies in possessing the extraordinary system of composite crystallization, in which an infinite number of crystals are disseminated equally in every possible azimuth, through a large crystalline plate; having their axes all inclined at the same angle to that of the larger plate, and producing similar phenomena in every direction, and through every portion of the plate: or this re- markable structure may be otherwise described, by saying that the minute elementary crystals form the surfaces of an infinite number of cones, whose axes pass perpendicularly through every part of the larger plate. An examination of the phenomena of iridescence afforded by this new substance, leads him to the conclusion that the iridescent films are formed at those times when the dash-wheel is at rest, during the night, and that they differ in their nature from the rest of the sub- stance. These phenomena illustrate in a striking manner some ana- logous appearances of incommunicable colours presented by mother- of-pearl, which had hitherto baffled all previous attempts to explain them ; but which now appear to be produced by occasional intermis- sions in the processs by which the material of the shell is secreted and deposited in the progress of its formation. Royal Society. 547 March 3.—A paper was read, entitled, “‘ Researches on the Tides. Fifth Series: On the Solar Inequality and on the Diurnal Inequality of the Tides at Liverpool.” By the Rev. William Whewel!, F.R.S., Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge. The inequality both in the height and time of high water in the morning and evening tides of the same day, which varies according to a law depending on the time of the year, is termed by the author the diurnal inequality, because its cycle is one day. The existence of such an inequality has often been noticed by seamen and other ob- servers ; but its reality has only recently been confirmed by regular and measured observations ; and its laws have never as yet been cor- rectly laid down. The author gives an account of the observations now in progress at different ports, from which he expects they will be ascertained with great precision. He traces the correspondence of the observations of the diurnal inequality already made with the equi- librium theory; and remarks that the semi-diurnal tides, alternately greater and less, which are transmitted from the Southern Ocean to Liverpool, may be compared to the oscillations of a fluid mass: and that they are augmented by the action of the forces occurring at in- tervals equal to those of the oscillations. Hence the oscillations go on increasing for a considerable period after the forces have gone on diminishing, and reach their maximum a week after the forces have passed theirs. The remaining sections of this paper are devoted to the investiga- tion of the Solar inequalities at Liverpool. By carefully elimiziating the Lunar effects, which the author is enabled to do by the aid of the preceding researches, he has determined the approximate circum- stances of the Solar correction for the height. He has also obtained evidence of the existence, and some knowledge of the laws of the Solar inequalities of the times ; and these inequalities, as thus dis- covered, are found to exhibit the same general agreement with the equilibrium theory which has been disclosed in all the inequalities hitherto detected. The results of the extensive observations now ob- tained are sufficiently precise to indicate the defects of our mathema- tical theories of hydrodynamics ; and some of these are pointed out by the author, who remarks that although a short time ago the theory was in advance of observation, at present observation is in advance of theory ; which mathematicians are therefore called upon to re- model and perfect. The author proceeds to consider the effect of the Moon's declina- tion on the Tides at Liverpool; which, as before observed, it is ne- cessary to eliminate, in order to obtain the Solar inequality; and gives an explanation of various formule and tables constructed for that object. He then investigates the laws of the solar inequalities, first, as to the heights; and secondly, as to the times of high water at Liverpool, by applying to them these methods of calculation. March 10,—* Report of Magnetic Experiments tried on board an Iron Steam-Vessel, by order of the Right Hon. the Lords Commis- sioners of the Admiralty.”” By Edward J. Johnson, Esq., Commander, R.N., accompanied by plans of the vessel, and tables showing the ho- 312 548 Royal Society. -‘rizontal deflection of the Magnetic Needle at different positions on board, together with the dip and magnetic intensity observed at those positions, and compared with that obtained on shore with the same instruments. Communicated by Captain Beaufort, R.N., F.R.S., Hydrographer to the Admiralty; by command of the Right Hon. the Lords Commissioners of the Admiralty. This report commences with a description of the iron steam-vessel, the “ Garryowen,” belonging to the City of Dublin Steam Packet Company, and built by the Messrs. Laird, of Liverpool. She is con- structed of malleable iron, is 281 tons burthen, and draws only 54 feet water, although the weight of iron in the hull, machinery, &c. is 180 tons. This vessel was placed under the directions of the author, in Tar- bert Bay, on the Shannon, on the 19th of October, 1835, for the pur- pose of investigating its local attractions on the compass. The me- thods which were adopted with that view are given ; together with tables of the results of the several experiments, and plans of the va- tious parts of the Garryowen. The horizontal deflections of the magnetic needle at different situations in the vessel were observed, for the purpose of ascertaining the most advantageous place for a steering compass, and also for the application of Professor Barlow’s correcting plate: and the dip and intensity in these situations were, at the same time, noted. An experiment is detailed, showing that where several magnetic needles, freely suspended, were placed upon the quay, in Tarbert Bay, and the vessel warped from the anchorage towards them, first with her head in that direction and then with her stern, opposite de- flections were produced: in the first case all the needles showing a deviation to the eastward, and in the latter to the westward, of the true magnetic meridian. Considering the height of the general mass of iron in the vessel and also that of the head and stern, together with the distance (169 feet) at which some of the needles indicated a deviation, the author concludes that the respective deflections were caused by the magnetic influence of the iron in the vessel ; the combined effect of that about the bows representing the north pole of a magnet, and that about the stern a south pole. Hethen offers several suggestions for future observation on this subject, and connected with the little oxidation that is reported to have taken place in the vessel. The experiments having been interrupted by a continuance of wet and stormy weather, the author proceeds to draw the following gene- ral practical conclusions, deduced from the series of observations already made, and points out the further experiments which he con- siders necessary to be tried. Ist. The ordinary place for a steering-compass on board ship is not a proper position for it in an iron steam-vessel. 2nd. The binnacle-compass in its usual place on board the Garry- owen is too much in error to be depended upon. 3rd. In selecting a proper position for a steering-compass on board iron steam-vessels, attention should be paid to its being placed, as Royal Society. 549 far as is practicable, not only above the general mass of iron, but also above any smaller portions of iron that may be in its vicinity; or such portions of iron should be removed altogether. 4th. The steering-compass should never be placed on a level with the ends either of horizontal or of perpendicular bars of iron. 5th, Theextreme ends of an iron vessel are unfavourable positions, in consequence of magnetic influences exerted in those situations. The centre of the vessel is also very objectionable, owing to the con- necting rods, shafts, and other parts of the machinery belonging to the steam-engine and wheels, which are in continual motion; inde- pendently of the influence exerted by the great iron tunnel in this part of the ship. 6th. No favourable results were obtained by placing the compass either below the deck, or on a stage over the stern. 7th. It was found that at a position 203 feet above the quarter- deck, and at another 134 feet above the same level, and about one seventh the length of the vessel from the stern, the deflections of the horizontal needle were less than those which have been observed in some of His Majesty’s ships. The author proceeds to point out various methods of determining, by means of a more extended inquiry, whether the position above indicated, or one nearer to the deck, is that at which the steering- compass would be most advantageously placed. The concluding section contains an account of some observations made by the author on the effects of local attraction on board dif- ferent steam-boats, from which it appears that the influence of this cause of deviation is more considerable than has been generally ima- gined; and he points out several precautions which should be observed in placing compasses on board such vessels. “ Researches on the Integral Calculus. Part I.” By Henry Fox Talbot, Esq., F.R.S. The author premises a brief historical sketch of the progress of discovery in this branch of analytical science. He observes that the first inventors of the integral calculus obtained the exact integration of a certain number of formule only ; resolving them into a finite number of terms, involving algebraic, circular, or logarithmic quan- tities, and developing the integrals of others into infinite series. The first great improvement in this department of analysis was made by Fagnani, about the year 1714, by the discovery of a method of rec- tifying the differences of two arcs of a given biquadratic parabola, whose equation is += y. He published, subsequently, a variety of important theorems respecting the division into equal parts of the arcs of the lemniscate, and respecting the ellipse and hyperbola; in both of which he showed how two arcs may be determined, of which the difference is a known straight line. Further discoveries in the algebraic integration of differential equations of the fourth degree were made by Euler; and the inquiry was greatly extended by Le- gendre, who examined and classified the properties of elliptic inte- grals, and presented the results of his researches in a luminous and well-arranged theory. In the year 1828, Mr. Abel, of Christiana, in 550 Royal Society. Norway, published a remarkable theorem, which gives the sum of a series of integrals of a more general form, and extending to higher powers than those in Euler’s theorem ; and furnishes a multitude of solutions for each particular case of the problem. Legendre, though at an advanced age, devoted a large portion of time to the verifica- tion of this important theorem, the truth of which he established upon the basis of the most rigorous demonstration. M. Poisson has, in a recent memoir, considered various forms of integrals which are not comprehended in Abel’s formula. The problem, to the solution of which the author has devoted the present paper, is of a more general nature than that of Abel. The integrals, to which the theorem of the latter refers, are those com- > g Pd : prised in the general expression ar where P and Rare entire po- lynomials in z. Next in order of succession to these, there naturally presents itself the class of integrals whose general expression is Ff ae where the polynomial R is affected with a cubic, instead of a quadratic radical; but Abel’s theorem has no reference to these, and consequently affords no assistance in their solution. The same may be said of every succeeding class of integrals affected with roots of higher powers. Still less does the theorem enzble us to find the sum of such integrals as /¢ (R) dz; R being, as before, any entire polynomial (that is, containing at least two different powers of 2), and ¢ being any function whatever. The author then details the processes by which he arrives at the solution of this latter problem. March 17.—A paper was read, “On the reciprocal attractions of positive and negative electric Currents, whereby the motion of each is alternately accelerated and retarded.” By P. Cunningham, Esq., Surgeon R.N. Communicated by Alexander Copland Hutchison, Esq., F.R.S. The author found that a square plate of copper, six inches in dia- meter, placed vertically in the plane of the magnetic meridian, and connected with a voltaic battery by means of wires soldered to the middle of two opposite sides of the plate, exhibited magnetic polarities On its two surfaces, indicative of the passage of transverse and spiral electrical currents, at right angles to the straight line joining the ends of the wires. The polarities were of opposite kinds on each side of this middle line, in each surface; and were reversed on the other surface of the plate. The intensities of these polarities at every point of the surface were greatest the greater its distance from the middle line, where the plate exhibited no magnetic action. The au- thor infers from this and other experiments of a similar kind, that each electric current is subject, during its transverse motion, to alterna- tions of acceleration and retardation, the positive current on the one side of the plate and the negative on the other, by their reciprocal at- tractions, progressively accelerating each other’s motions, as they approach, in opposite directions, the edge round which they have to turn, After turning round the edge their motion will, he conceives, Royal Society. 551 be checked by coming in contact with the accelerated portions of the opposing currents to which they respectively owed their former in- crease of velocity; so that the one current will be retarded at the part of the plate where the other is accelerated. To these alternate accelerations and retardations of electric currents during their pro- gressive motion, the author is disposed to refer the alternate dark and luminous divisions in a platina wire heated by electricity, as was observed by Dr. Barker. “ Meteorological Journal kept at Allenheads, near Hexham.” By the Rev. William Walton. Communicated in a letter to P. M. Roget, M.D., Sec. R.S. This Journal contains a register of the height of the barometer, taken at 9 a.m, and at 3 p.m. during every day in January and February 1836, with remarks on the state of the weather during a few particular days. The station where the observations were made is elevated 1400 feet above the level of the sea. March 24.—A paper was in part read, entitled “ On the Tem- peratures and Geological Relations of certain Hot Springs ;_ particu- larly those of the Pyrenees ; and.on the Verification of Thermometers.” By James David Forbes, Esy., F.R.S., Professor of Natural Philosophy in the University of Edinburgh. The Society then adjourned over the Easter vacation, to meet again on the 14th of April. April 14.—The reading of Professor Forbes’s paper, “ On the Temperatures and Geological Relations of certain Hot Springs ; par- ticularly those of the Pyrenees; and on the Verification of ‘Thermo- meters,’’ was resumed and concluded. The author expresses his regret that notwithstanding the great in- terest, more especially in a geological point of view, which attaches to every topic connected with the origin, the nature, and the perma- nence in temperature of the many thermal springs met with in dif- ferent parts of the world, our information on these subjects is exceed- ingly deficient. On many points which might easily be verified, and which are of essential consequence towards obtaining a satisfactory theory of the phenomena, we as yet possess but vague and uncertain knowledge, It is evident that the first step towards the establish- ment of such a theory must consist in the precise determination of the actual temperature of each spring; from which we may derive the means of estimating by comparative observations, at different periods, the progressive variations, whether secular, monthly, or even diurnal, to which that temperature is subject. We have at present, indeed, not only to lament the total absence of exact data on which to found such an inquiry ; but we are obliged to confess that, owing to the difficulties which meet us even in the thresbhold, we have not, even at the present day, made any preparation for establishing the basis of future investigation, by applying such methods of experiment as are really in our power, and are commensurate with the superior accuracy of modern science, The researches of Fourier would lead us to the conclusion that, if the high temperature of these springs be derived solely from that of the interior portions of the earth, the 552 Royal Society. changes which can have occurred in that temperature, during any period to which history extends, must be so minute as to be inappre- ciable. On the other hand, the theory of internal chemical changes, which have been assigned as the origin of volcanos, would suggest it as improbable that this temperature has remained constantly the same ; and as a more likely occurrence, even were we to suppose that no uniform secular diminution took place, that it would be liable to occasional irregular fluctuations, The influence of earthquakes on the temperature of hot springs is also admitted; and it would be very desirable to learn, from a series of consecutive observations, whether abrupt changes, similar to those which have occasionally been noticed, are not of frequent occurrence. The author has diligently laboured to collect, by observations made on the spot, materials for supplying this great chasm in the natural history of our globe. As an essential preliminary means of obtaining accurate results, he applied himself to the verification of the scales of the thermometers he employed in these researches: and he describes, in a separate section of this paper, the methods which he adopted for the attainment of this object. He first fixed with great precision the standard points of each thermometer, namely the freezing and boiling temperatures of water, by a mode which he specifies: and afterwards determined the intermediate points of the scale by a me- thod, similar to that of Bessel; namely, that of causing a detached column of mercury to traverse the tube; but simpler in practice. Instead of employing for that purpose columns of mercury of arbi- trary length, and deducing by a complex and tentative process the portions of the tube having equal capacities, the author detaches a column of mercury from the rest, of such a length as may be nearly an aliquot part of the length of the scale for 180°; and causes this column to step along the tube; the lower part of the column being brought successively to the exact points which the upper extremity had previously occupied: so that, at last, if its length has been pro- perly chosen, the upper end of the column is found to coincide with the end of the scale: and this being accomplished, it is easy to apply to every part of the actual scale of the instrument the proper correc- tions, which may, for greater practical convenience, be drawn up in the form of a table. In the next section, the author gives a detailed account of his ob- servations of the mineral springs of the Pyrenees, made during the months of July and August, 1835, following them in their natural order from west to east, and describing their geological positions, the special circumstances of interest relating to them, and their actual temperatures. In the third and last section he extends his inquiries to the hot springs met with in some other parts of Europe ; and in particular, those of the baths of Mont Dor and of Bourboule, in France; of Baden-Baden, in Germany; of Loésche, or Leuk, in the Vallais ; of Pfeffers, in the canton of St. Gall, in Switzerland ; and the baths of Nero, near Naples. The final results of all the observations con- tained in this paper are presented in the form of a table, with com- Geological Society. 553 parative columns of those derived from some unpublished observa- tions of M. Arago, and of those of M. Anglada. GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY. _ (Continued from p. 160.) Dec: 16, 1835.—A paper, entitled “‘ Notes on the Geology of Den- mark,” by Dr. Beck of Copenhagen, and communicated by the Presi- dent, was first read. The only part of the Danish dominions in which gneiss and gra- nitic rocks like those of Scandinavia appear, is in the north-east of the Island of Bornholm. To the south and south-west of these for- mations in the same island, are beds considered to be of the age-of the Silurian system of Mr. Murchison; and on the eastern side of it are strata of the cretaceous period, all the intermediate groups being wanting. Respecting the exact age of the lower part of the cretaceous beds in Bornholm, much difference of opinion has existed, By some it has been referred to the old carboniferous formation, on account of the presence of large quantities of coal, and impressions of ferns; by others to a lignite deposit of a very new or diluvial period; by M. Alexander Brongniart to the age of the lias ; by Dr. Pingel to the iron sand of Messrs. Conybeare and Phillips ; and by Dr. Beck to the English strata, from the Hastings sand to the upper green sand in- clusive. The fossil ferns found in these beds belong to the genus Pecopteris, and some of the species have been named by M. Adolphe Brongniart. The seed-vessel of a monocotyledonous plant of com- mon occurrence in these strata, and considered by Dr. Beck to belong to the family Restiacee, is identical with one in Mr. Mantell’s collec- tion obtained at Heathfield in Sussex. ‘The few shells associated with the ferns which the author has examined are marine; and he conceives that these Bornholm beds were deposited in the sea at some distance from the mouth of the river which formed the Wealden system of England. To the south of these coal-bearing strata are beds of siliceous and calcareous sand, containing between 30 and 40 species of shells, which also occur in the upper green sand of England: and in the neigh- bourhood of Arnager is a small patch of greyish white chalk with very few flints, but abundance of fossils, agreeing with those of the lower white chalk without flints at Southerham near Lewes. In Denmark Proper the oldest formation belongs to beds of the cretaceous series, younger than those in the island of Bornholm. The lowest strata consist of pure white, soft chalk, with many layers of black, nodular flints, and contain more than 300 species of fossils. Among these remains, Ammonites are extremely scarce, Marsupites are unknown; and the remains of fishes, except teeth of the shark fa- mily, are very rare: but small zoophytes and microscopic foraminifera are very abundant; and, in some instances, animals of the sponge tribe, replaced by flint or chalcedony, but retaining their form, con- 554 Geological Society. stitute complete beds. This portion of the chalk series forms, very generally, the lower part of the strata in Seeland and Jutland, and the whole of the cliffs of Moen. But in Moen masses of gravel and sand have, in consequence of great disturbances, become entangled with portions of disrupted chalk, in the manner explained by Mr. Lyell in a paper lately read before the Society*. This white chalk is immediately overlaid, in Seeland and elsewhere, by the Faxoe beds, consisting almost entirely of hard, yellowish limestone, susceptible of a polish. They contain some of the cha- racteristic fossils of the white chalk and some which are peculiar, belonging to the genera Arca, Modiola, Venus, Trochus, Fusus, Vo- luta, Oliva, Cyprea, Nautilus, &c.; while in the quarries at Faxoe (Seeland) they are composed so largely of zoophytes that they may justly be regarded as a coral reef. ‘This division of the cretaceous series attains at Faxoe a thickness of more than 40 feet, but it is only between 2 and 4 feet thick at Stevensklint, where it may be traced for 3 or 4 miles resting upon the white chalk and covered by other strata of this series. The Faxoe beds appear also in some places in Jutland as in the Island of Mors, the cliffs near Grenaa, &c. These beds have been imagined to be perfectly parallel to those of Maestricht, but the organic remains differ considerably ; and are more analogous to those found at Kiinruth near Liege. Among the fossils common to the last locality and the Faxoe beds, are Baculites Fawasii, Nautilus fricator (Beck), Fusus elongatus (Beck), and 7 erebratulasubgi- gantea (Schlotheim). Dr. Beck also states that the Nautilus Danicus is not identical with the Nautilus aganiticus of the lias, though Von Buch considers that it is : he likewise states that he has not been able to identify any of the Faxoe fossils with those of the oolitic series, or with the shells of Gosau, or with any of the tertiary fossils hitherto described. The cretaceous beds which immediately cover the Faxoe deposit in Stevensklint, consist of a whitish and hardish chalk, including so great a number of broken and almost pulverised zoophytes that the rock is sometimes entirely composed of them. The bivalves and echinoder- mata are chiefly the same as those of the white chalk, but the univalves, so common in the Faxoe beds, are wanting, while many of the smaller corals which occur in those beds occur also in this upper limestone. The flint of these superior strata is sometimes in continuous layers as in Stevensklint, sometimes in nodules, and differs from the flint in the white chalk in being more opake, and having a less conchoidal fracture. Sometimes it is replaced by a bluish grey stone, composed of silex and lime, and called in Danish “ bleger.” Dr. Beck infers from the organic remains that the chalk of Salt- holm; of the cliffs in Jutland, ranging from Rugaard by Daugbjerg and Monsted, and terminating in the neighbourhood of Hjerm ; as well as the chalk of the south of Thyholm, that resting upon the white chalk in part of Mors and in the northof Thy; and the chalk of thecliffs of Bulbjerg and the islet Skarreklit belongs to this uppermost bed. * Proceedings, No. 41. Vol. II. p. 191., or Lond. and Edinb. Phil. Mag., vol. vii, p. 412. Geological Society. 555 Upon the chalk in various districts in Denmark is a breccia of an+ gular fragments of chalk and flint cemented with carbonate of lime. The chalk hills of Denmark present generally the same rounded, smooth outline as in many parts of England, with this distinction, that in Denmark they are crowned very commonly with small mammilliform hillocks of gravel, sand, and erratic blocks. As the sandy beds some- times contain shells identical with those now living in the German Ocean, it is evident that the chalk in Denmark has been submerged since the existence of the living species of Testacea. In Bornholm, Moen, and Seeland, the strike of the cretaceous strata is dependent on the strike of the most ancient granitic rocks in Scania; but in Jutland it is not parallel to them, and evidently was not caused by the same system of movements. In the central parts of Jutland is an extensive formation several hundred feet thick, referred by Dr. Beck to tertiary strata probably older than the erratic blocks. It consists in some localities of white micaceous sand, in which occasionally occur traces of brown coal, and near Skanderberg is a considerable layer of it. In other districts the formation is composed of clay, which also contains mica, flat masses of hydraulic limestone, like the septaria of the London clay, and occasionally a few organic remains, consisting of scales of fishes apparently belonging to the Cyprinide; the elytra of beetles, the cases of the larve of Phryganza, and an hymenopterous insect which the author has called Cleptis Stenstrupii. In the neighbourhood of Thisted at Thye, the north of Mors and in the island Fir, Dr. Beck observed, in 1831, dislocations which affect equally these tertiary strata and the chalk. To the tertiary period belong also the beds discovered by Professor Forchhammer in the island of Sylt, on the western shores of Holstein. Some of the few shells hitherto detected in them Dr. Beck has ascer- tained to agree with characteristic fossils of the London clay, and others, as Voluia Lambertii, with shells of the crag. To the same older tertiary period the author is inclined to refer the strata containing Valvata, Gyrogonites, &c., detected at Segeberg, and the deposit between Altona and Geuchstad in which Mr. Lyell disco- vered a valve of a Cardita. Newer than any of the above-mentioned formations are the deposits of gravel, sand, and loam, often several hundred feet thick, which ge- nerally cover the older strata, and constitute almost the whole surface of Denmark. In and upon these beds, the erratic blocks so common in that kingdom first appear. They consist principally of the commoner varieties of the gneiss and granitic schists of Scandinavia; but in the neighbourhood of Copenhagen Dr. Beck has observed blocks of trans- ition limestone, basalt with olivine, and the well-known secondary sandstone of Hor. In the northern part of Jutland he has also no- ticed blocks of Elfadal porphyry, and the blue zircon-syenite of Fre- dericksvaern in Norway. The gravel beds with erratic blocks rarely contain any fossils, but when shells do occur, they are often absolutely identical with living species. Dr. Beck has, however, found at Moen a specimen of Pleurotoma, which he believes to be tertiary, and there 556 Geological Society. and at Himlingoie several specimens of Turritella not hitherto known as living. From the difference of the fossils, together withthe manner in which the gravel beds are disposed upon the chalk, he infers that the older strata have been elevated and submerged more than once. Dr. Beck says that space does not permit him to give his views re- specting the erratic blocks, and he merely states that their depo- sition took place after the beginning of the tertiary period, and went on during the accumulation of blue marl and sand, from which he has obtained more than 70 species of shells now living in the German Ocean; and that he has proofs, of which he intends to give a more detailed account hereafter, that the transportation of these blocks continues on the coast of Jutland. In conclusion the author mentions the existence of several, small, lacustrine formationsin the interior of Jutland and of Moen, containing remains of Lymneza, Physa, Helix, &c. ; and an extensive formation of sand cemented by oxide of iron. An extract from a letter addressed to the President by H. Edwin Strickland, Esq., F.G.S.,dated Athens, 26th Oct., 1835,was then read, Mr. Strickland noticed first at Trieste the vast formation of secon- dary limestone which appears to extend thence uninterruptedly into Greece ; and of which the Ionian Islands are almost wholly composed. In Corfu, however, are several obscure and complicated patches of tertiary deposits, and in Cephalonia is a Pliocene formation of vast thickness, containing abundance of fossils. Mr. Strickland then de- scribes the currents of sea-water which constantly flow into the land near Argostoli in the island of Cephalonia. This extraordinary phe- nomenon occurs about a mile north of Argostoli at the very extremity of the rocky promontory which separates that town from the large bay on the west. The promontory is composed of the hard, white, second- ary limestone, the strata dipping about 30° to the east ; and at this spot it contains several species of shells which in general are rather rare. The streams of water have been noticed for many years rushing in between the rugged masses of rock of which the coast consists, but it was only about two years since that they excited the attention of the English. Mr. Stevens of Argostoli, desirous to turn them to advan- tage, was induced to stop up three of these holes, and by excavating a channel at the principal one, has been enabled to obtain a sufficient supply of water to turn a mill. The channel which has been made is about three feet wide, and the average depth of the current is six inches. In the mean state of the tide the fall is about 3 feet, the usual rise of the tide being 6 inches, but during southerly winds itis consi derably more. After passing the wheel the current flows for 6 or 7 yards, and is then partly absorbed in swallow holes and partly disap- pears under the rocks. The water at the bottom of the excavation at greatest at high tides, the quantity of water then flowing in being greatest. A small freshwater spring enters the excavation on the land side, and when the sea is effectually stopped out, renders the water at the bottom of the excavation quite fresh in the course of a day; rais- ing it at the same time several inches to a certain point, where it rests. Geological Society. 557 This circumstance, Mr. Strickland thinks, may be explained by the less specific gravity of the fresh water requiring a higher column to overcome the obstacles met with in its subterranean course. In order to ascertain the direction of the current, Col. Brown has had an exca- vation made, by which it appears that the stream does nct pass unddr the sea at the opposite side of the promontory. Mr. Strickland, in explanation of the constant flowing into the land of these streams, ob- jects to the proposition that the subterranean current may be absorbed by the incumbent soil and evaporated at the surface, as it occurs in an island of small extent : but agrees to the supposition that an earth- quake has at some period opened a communication between the sea and the region of volcanic fire ; that the water being there converted into steam, is afterwards condensed in its upward course, and forms those hot-springs which exist in various parts of Greece. A paper onthe occurrence of fossil vertebre of fish of the shark fa- mily in the Loess of the Rhine, near Basle, by Charles Lyell, Esq., F.G.S., was afterwards read. Mr. Lyell described in a memoir communicated to the Society in May, 1834,* the geographical extent of the Loess or ancient silt of the Rhine, as far as he had then examined it. In tracing its southern limits during last summer, he found it in considerable force at Basle, and still higher on the Rhine at Waldshutt, where it contains the usual land and freshwater shells, Beyond this point he did not trace the deposit; but from the information he received, he believes that it terminates between Waldshutt and Schaffhausen. He here alludes only to the loamy portion, which can be identified by its fossils ; for the gravel beds with which the loess sometimes alternates in its lower part, are probably of much greater extent, and are not easily to be separated from any other ancient gravel in which bones or shells have not been discovered. The loess at Basle crowns the summit, and is found on the sloping sides of several low hills which bound the valley of the Rhine; but it is best seen one or two miles to the south of the town, in the hills called Bruder Holz, where it rests upon nearly horizontal beds of molasse. The loess has here an elevation of more than 1100 feet above the sea; for it is found in places which are more than 300 feet above the Rhine at Basle, according to the measurement of Prof. Merian, who has also determined that the Rhine at Basle is about 760 French feet (809 English) above the level of the sea. The principal section examined by Mr. Lyell is near the northern extremity of the Bruder Holz below the church of the village of Bin- ningen. The loess in this place is of its usual yellowish grey colour, and is filled with terrestrial and freshwater shells. The lower beds al- ternate with strata of sand and gravel, and in one of the loamy strata of this part of the series, he found the vertebra of fish, together with the following loess shells: Succinea oblonga, Pupa muscorum, Clau- * See Proceedings of the Geological Society, No. 41. Vol. II. p. 83; Jameson’s Journal, Vol. 19.; and Lond. and Edinb. Phil. Mag., vol. v., p. 223. 558 Geological Society. silia parvula, Helix cellaria, H.plebeium, H. arbustorum, H. rotundata, Bulimus lubricus, and a small Planorbis, all recent shells. The vertebre, M. Agassiz says, belong decidedly to the Squalide or shark family, perhaps to the genus Lamna. The one is a caudal and the other an abdominal vertebra, each about a quarter of an inch in diameter. They are in such a state of preservation, and of such a colour as might be expected in bones preserved in loess, and as they were in a bed of fine loam in which there were no extraneous fossils, nor any fragments of rock washed out of other formations, there is no reason to suspect that they could have been derived from the ter- tiary molasse; and M. Agassiz also states that he has seen nothing like them in the molasse of Switzerland, It may seem very extraor- dinary that the first remains of fossil fish obtained from this freshwater silt should belong to a marine genus, but M. Agassiz has informed Mr. Lyell that both in the Senegal and the Amazon certain species of the shark and skate families (Squalus and Raia, Linn.) have been known to ascend to the distance of several hundred miles from the ocean, and analogous facts are referred to in Marcgrave and Piso’s Natural History of India. A notice on the occurrence of selenite in the sands of the plastic clay at Bishopstone near Herne Bay, by William Richardson, Esq., F.G.S., was lastly read. The perpendicular cliff in which the selenite occurs is about a hun- dred feet in height, and consists of the following strata : Vegetable mould. Reddish marl or brick earth........ 5 feet. Mondontclaysy SSF et 20 to 30 — Sand and sandstone.............. 60 — The selenite is found in the sand, which, as far as the author could determine, contains no iron pyrites or lime except in a few well-de- fined lines of testaceous remains. The superjacent clay abounds in pyrites, and is thickly studded with transparent crystals of sulphate of lime, but noconnexion could be traced between the two deposits, and the sands for five or six feet underlying the clay contain no selenite. January 6, 1836.—A notice on the transportation of rocks by ice, extracted from a letter of Capt. Bayfield, R.N., addressed to Charles Lyell, Esq., P.G.S., was first read. Capt. Bayfield says that both on the lakes of Canada and in the St. Lawrence he has seen fragmentary rocks carried by ice. The St. Lawrence is low in winter, and the loose ice accumulating on the ex- tensive shoals which line each side of the river is frozen into a solid mass, being exposed to a temperature sometimes 30° below zero. Theshoals are thickly strewed with boulders, which become entangled in the ice ; and in the spring, when the river rises from the melting of the snow, the packs are floated off, frequently conveying the boul- ders for great distances. It is also well known that stones are car- ried by the ice. Anchors laid down within high-water mark to secure vessels hauled on shore for the winter, are cut out of the ice on the approach of spring, or they would be carried away. In 1834 the Gulnare’s bower-anchor, weighing half a ton, was transported some * Geological Society. 559 yards by the ice, and so firmly was it fixed, that the force of the moving ice broke a chain cable as large as that of a 10-gun brig, and which had rode the Gulnare during the heaviest gales in the Gulf. The anchor was cut out of the ice or it would have been carried into deep water and lost. With respect to rocks being transported by icebergs, Capt. Bayfield’s testimony is equally conclusive, as he passed three seasons in the vi- cinity of the Strait of Belleisle. In an iceberg which he examined, boulders, gravel, and stones were thickly imbedded ; and he saw others which owed their dirty colour to the same cause. Some of these immense ice-islands, Capt. Bayfield thinks, had been detached from the coast very far to the northward, perhaps from Baffin’s Bay. The northern current brings similar masses in great numbers down the coast of Labrador every year, and they are very frequently carried through the straits, and for several hundred miles to the S.W. up the Gulf of St. Lawrence. A paper “ On the syenite veins which traverse mica slate at Good- land eliff and chalk at Torr Eskert, to the south of Fair Head in the county of Antrim,” by Richard Griffith, Esq., F.G.S., and P.G.S. of Dublin, was afterwards read. The part of Antrim to which this paper refers is situated between Fair Head on the north, and Cushleake mountain on thesouth. The base, or oldest formation of the district, consists of inclined strata of mica slate passing into gneiss, and containing subordinate beds of hornblende slate and schistose limestone. Upon the mica slate re- pose nearly horizontal and unconformable strata of coal measures, new red sandstone, and chalk ; andthe whole of these secondary deposits are surmounted by an overlying mass of rudely columnar trap, the northern extremity of which forms the magnificent promontory of Fair Head. Besides the hornblende schist, which is interstratified with the mica slate and dips conformably with it, there are other rocks containing hornblende, which appear to be imbedded in the slate, but which are really intruded veins. On the sea-shore at Torr Point are two of these veins, consisting of syenite and syenitic green-stone; and they may be traced passing obliquely along the face of the stupendous and, for the greater part, perpendicular cliff of Goodland. On the sea-shore they appear so regular and conformable, both in strike and dip, to the strata of mica slate, that they might be considered as integral portions of it; but on minute inspection the syenite is found to mould into the rough and saw-like edges of the strata of mica-slate ; and on tracing the veins as they gradually ascend the cliff, they are found to pursue undulating courses, neither parallel to each other nor to the lamine of the slate, in some places approaching within four feet, and in others being more than 20 feet apart. To the south of the fault which traverses the cliff about 150 yards from Torr Point, the veins reappear at a higher level than on the north of the line of dislocations ; and between the two previously noticed is a third and smaller one. Where first seen, this small vein is in contact with the upper surfaces of the lower vein, from which it gradually diverges and approaches the upper, but afterwards again descends towards the lower vein. 560 Geological Society. The mass of the two larger veins consists of dark green, crystallized hornblende, brownish red felspar, and occasionally quartz ; and re- gular transitions may be traced from syenite to greenstone. When viewed at a distance they present a rudely columnar structure. The centre vein contains much black hornblende, some black quartz, and presents a concretionary structure, the oval-shaped masses being en- veloped in a congeries of pinchbeck brown mica, A tendency to this structure is observable also in the upper vein. Owing to the covered nature of the ground, the syenite veins of the coast cannot be traced continuously to Torr Eskert, but by laying down the line of the veins of Goodland cliff on the Ordnance Map, and making due allowance for theit average inclination and the ele- vation of the hill, Mr. Griffith entertains no doubt that the syenite in the chalk of Torr Eskert is a prolongation of one of the syenite veins in the slate of the cliff. The syenite which traverses the chalk cannot be distinguished from that of the mica slate, and passes also in syenitic greenstone. At one point the author had a portion of the surface soil removed, and obtained the following section: Top... Compact chalk ..... i..57.,< erase Ee VERE). 6 gina oie ehoicts Rio. ein tials 5 — Chalk, irregular bed from 9 inches to 1 foot Wiiealate, .:icishit, wad aoacgielaste The lower bed of chalk contains quartz pebbles, green sand, and numerous, red, siliceous grains, some of which resemble garnets. The syenite presents large masses separated by chalk containing quartz- pebbles, green sand, and numerous fragments of fossils. These re- mains have nearly a vertical position when zn situ, and Mr. Griffith consequently infers that they are not in the position in which they were deposited. The irregularities on the surface of the chalk are accurately filled with the syenite: the chalk in immediate contact with the vein is usually compact, suinetimes crystallized ; and pebbles of quartz si- milar to those in the green sand and chalk are found occasionally in the syenite. The author noticed a small reniform mass of syenite imbedded in the chalk—the grain of the included portion being finer than that of the syenite in general. Small particles of chalk were likewise noticed in the syenite, and the union of the two rocks is so perfect that the chalk appears to be an integral portion of a compound deposit. Among other peculiarities exhibited at the junctionof the two formations, the author mentions spheroidal masses of syenite in- cludedin the chalk ; and, in conclusion, he says, that if the views which he has put forward have been substantiated, a new and important fact is added to those already described, which may ultimately lead us to attribute a comparatively recent origin not only to syenite veins and primary greenstone, but also to crystalline rocks generally when as- sociated with schistose strata. A letter from H. T. De la Beche, Esq., addressed to the President, and dated Truro, the 18th of December, 1835, was then read. This letter was accompanied by a collection of fossils from the Geological Society. 561 schistose rocks of the North of Cornwall, and presented to the Society on the part of the Ordnance Geological Survey. ‘ Mr. De la Beche says that in the grauwacke of Western Somerset, Devon, and Cornwall natural divisions may be made, founded on marked characters. How far these divisions may coincide with those in Prof. Sedgwick’s Cambrian system he has no means at present of judging ; but he is of opinion that the whole of the district is older than the Silurian formations of Mr. Murchison. Some of the organic remains obtained at Dinas Cove, in Padstow Harbour, belong to a system of beds consisting of slates, sandstones, and conglomerates, which encircles the northern flank of Dartmoor, then makes a great curve south of Launceston, bends afterwards northward round the Rough Tor and Brown Willy granite, and lastly, again inclines southward, crossing the Padstow river to the seaon the western coast. In various parts of this line the system is fossiliferous, particularly where limestone occurs or calcareous matter abounds. The Tintagel slate, long since shown by Dr. Buckland and the Rev. John Conybeare to contain organic remains, belongs to this system. Part of the fossils which accompanied the letter were procured from Trevelga Island (Lower St. Columb Porth), and Towan Head near New Quay, from the same series of beds, which, in consequence of an east and west anticlinal line ranging by St. Eval, St. Issey, and St. Breocks Downs, is folded over to the south, and constitutes the schistose system of St. Columb Major, St. Columb Minor, New Quay, &c. The remainder of the fossils was obtained by Dr. Potts at the western entrance of Bodmin, and by Mr. De la Beche from the vi- cinity of Liskeard, on a prolongation of the same strata. Altered or metamorphic rocks, having frequently the appearance of gneiss, mica slate, hornblende rock, &c., occur in the neighbourhood of Tintagel and Camelford; and’Mr. De la Beche says, that a little care in tracing these rocks shows that they are altered portions of strata which possess the usual and varied characters of grauwacke. In con- clusion he observes, that there is every reason to believe that two movements have taken place of the land in Somerset, Devon, and Corn- wall, one to a height of 30 or 40 feet above the present sea-level, and another to an uncertain depth beneath it, since the vegetation of the land and the molluscous inhabitants of the neighbouring sea were the same as they now are. January 20.—A paper was read “ On the geological structure of Pembrokeshire, more particularly on the extension of the Silurian system of rocks into the coast cliffs of that county.” By Roderick Impey Murchison, Esq., V.P.G.S. This memoir was prefaced by an account of the origin of the terms Silurian and Cambrian Systems as applied to the older sedimentary deposits. Having occupied several years in establishing a fixed order of succession amid the strata of age anterior to the old red sandstone, and having finally named the formations in descending order, the Ludlow rock, Wenlock limestone, Caradoc sandstones, and Llandeilo flags, the author was urged by many leading geologists to propose a Third Series. Vol.8. No. 50. Supplement, June 1836. 3K 562 Geological Society. new, comprehensive name for this group, and thereby to prevent the confusion which had so long prevailed by the use of the words “‘Trans- ition” and “Grauwacke.” He adopted the term Silurian System, be- cause the territory in which the successive formations above mentioned are exhibited, was formerly occupied by the ancient, British people the Silures. The Silurian rocks are underlaid by vast masses which rise up into the mountains of North, and the western part of South Wales, and to these Professor Sedgwick, connecting his labours with those of Mr. Murchison, has assigned the name of ‘‘ Cambrian System.” A portion of last summer was employed in tracing these rocks from Caermarthenshire into Pembroke, and in doing this the author was Jed to attempt a general survey of the county, examining the strata from the youngest to the oldest, dwelling, however, specially on the deposits of the “ Silurian System.” Owing to its peninsulated form and the transverse fissures proceed- ing from Milford Haven into the heart of the county, Pembrokeshire affords great facilities for the comprehension of its mineral structure, and as the chief masses range from E. to W., sections from S. to N. expose the formations of which it is composed in descending order from the coal-measures to the Cambrian System. The points of novelty in the descriptions of the author apply to the persistence of the carboniferous deposits along the coast of St. Bride’s Bay, where they are not separated by any mass of greywacke as indicated in former maps, the parts producing culm*, lying simply to the N. and S. of a highly dislocated promontory of carboniferous grit. The contortions and innumerable faults of these coal-measures being pointed out, attention is then called to some of the probable results of such movements in the singular accumulations of finely fractured stone coal in small basins called ‘slashes,’ and to other vertical downcasts of the mineral termed “sloughs.” The shale of these culm deposits resembling in some respects certain strata of the upper Si- lurian rocks, might to an unpractised eye appear undistinguishable ; but even where the order of superposition is’not to be detected, essential differences are invariably to be observed, in the coal shales never con- taining those organic animal remains which are so abundant in the Silurian system, whilst the latter never contains a single plant simi- lar to those which abound in the former. Instances are cited where by dislocations the coal measures are thrown into positions apparently conformable to old greywacke rocks of the Cambrian system, and hence the author surmises, that if the millstone grit and carboniferous limestone were not present in many adjoining parts to test the true age of these coal measures, mistakes might easily result from such juxta-positions. Cherty and siliceous sandstones (the millstone grit) rise in dome shapes to the west of Haverford, and occupy large por- tions of the coal tract underlying the productive culm measures and capping the mountain limestone. Carboniferous Limestone.—In this formation, besides the very ac- * All the coal of Pembroke is stone coal, and it is usually in the laminated condition of culm, Geological Society. 563 curate outline expressed in Mr. De la Beche’s map*, the author re- marks the existence of a double trough of the lower limestone shale overlying the old red sandstone in East Angle Bay ; and he particu- larly adverts to the peculiar mineral character of these beds in Pem- brokeshire in containing yellow and light coloured sandstones alter- nating with shale. The fossils of this lowest member of the carboni- ferous system are numerous, many having been furnished by the Earl of Cawdor ; and as far as they have been yet examined they appear to differ specifically from all the fossils of the inferior systems. The coal measures and mountain limestone of Pembroke are singularly subject to great faults ; one of the most remarkable of which occurs between Johnston and Haverfordwest, where the carboniferous limestone is thrown into a position by which it appears to overlay the coal. Old Red Sandstone.—The upper strata of this great formation pass upwards in many places into the shale and sandstone of the carboni- ferous limestone, and the lowest members graduate into the Silurian system. The great mass consists of sandy shale, here termed the “‘red rab,” associated with red sandstones and grits ; but lithological varia- tions from the usual typesin Herefordshire have led to the belief that large districts (Cosheston, Williamston, Benton, &c.) consisted of greywacke. These are yellow, grey, and greenish micaceous sand- Stones which the author proves to be interlaced with the “ red rab,” and to occupy the same position,as similar varieties of the rock pre- viously described in Hereford, Radnor, &c. Some.of the coarse grits (Canaston wood) are undistinguishable from the « greywacke ” grit of the oldest rocks of the Cambrian system. Calcareous matter is very sparingly exhibited, imperfect concretions or very impure “ corn- stones” appearing only at wide intervals. The fishes so profusely de- tected by the author in the range of the formation through Salop, Hereford, and Monmouth, have not been observed. Amid the many faults affecting this formation, those by which the strata ranging from Caermarthen into Pembrokeshire have been powerfully bent and bro- ken, and thrown into a westerly direction (Tavern Spite, &c.), are perhaps the most striking. Silurian System.—Though the order of superposition and the or- ganic remains clearly attest the age of the rocks of the Silurian system, the masses differ so much in mineral aspect from those selected as types that it is rarely possible to subdivide them into the Ludlow, Wenlock, Caradoc, and Llandeilo formations; but adopting the classi- fication proposed, the author has laid down their course upon the map as two sub-groups consisting of “ upper and lower Silurian rocks+.” The former parting with their mudstone characters are for the most part hard and siliceous, containing little calcareous matter, and are never subdivided by zones of limestone as at Aymestry and Wenlock. The lower Silurian rocks, on the contrary, are amply displayed in all * The survey of the county was much facilitated by the possession of Mr, De la Beche’s map of South Pembroke, which, though differing in some points from that completed by the author, is mentioned by him as a work of great merit for the period of its publication. + See Lond. & Edinb. Phil. a ph vii. p. 46, Silurian System. 3K 2 564 Geological Society. their characteristic forms, the limestones of the Llandeilo formation expanding to greater thicknesses (Llanpeter-Felfry, Llandewi, &c.) than in any other part of their course, and containing many beautiful fossils, including two unpublished species of Trilobites, common to Caermarthenshire. The chief mass of the Silurian system ranges from E. to W. across the county, passing by Haverfordwest, till its western extremity subsides beneath the coal measures of Druson Haven and St. Bride’s Bay. Other bands of it rise from beneath the old red sandstone at Orlanton, Hoten, and Johnston ; whilst a most re- markable zone is heaved up in an anticlinal line extending across the most southern promontory of the county (Castle Martin Hundred), from Fresh Water East to Fresh Water West. The most perfect succession of the rocks of which the system is composed, is exhi- bited in the bold coast cliffs of Marloes Bay, extending for a distance of two miles, in which space the uppermost strata, rising at angles of 35° to 40° from beneath the old red sandstone of Hook Point, are succeeded by conformable, underlying masses, until the whole graduates down and passes into the rocks of the Cambrian system in Wooltack Park and Skomer Island. The Ludlow and Wenlock formations can be here defined; the latter containing many well- known fossils. The lower Silurian rocks are still more largely de- veloped; a vast thickness of fossiliferous sandy strata being quite identical with the “‘ Caradoc sandstones,” whilst the Llandeilo flags with Asaphus Buchit and A, Bigsbii (a new species of the author) occur in the haven called Moseley-wick Mouth. This coast section is 150 miles distant from the N. eastern extremity of the Silurian system. The Cambrian System.—If divided by a line passing from E. to W., the northern half of Pembroke is exclusively composed of the older rocks of the Cambrian system, consisting, in descending order, of a. Dark-coloured incoherent schists, with few stone bands, no cal- careous matter, and scarcely any traces of organic remains. These occupy a great breadth, and, as in Caermarthenshire, they form the beds of passage between the Silurian and the Cambrian systems (sometimes without any break). b. Hard grits and flagstones, coming strictly within the definition of greywacke of German mineralogists. c. Hard purple sandstones and schists, identical with the slaty grey- wacke of the Longmynd, Salop, (the Lammermuir hills, Scotland, may be cited as a good and well-known type of these rocks). d. Slates coarse and fine, with quartz veins and concretions. At St. David’s, Pantiphilip, and Scillyham, where the roofing-slates are quarried, the author has detected what he believes to be a coin- cidence between the laminz of deposit as indicated by differently co- loured layers of sediment, and the lines of slaty cleavage; though in the great majority of cases in Pembroke the rocks of this system, whether consisting of sandstone, schist, or hard slate, exhibit the di- vergences between the lines of true bedding and slaty cleavage, so clearly and ingeniously explained by Professor Sedgwick. The author therefore thinks it right to point to these exceptions to the Geological Society. 565 observations of Prof. Sedgwick, because if strictly scrutinized the phenomena are not placed in opposition to them, since it was his belief upon the spot, that the crystallizing action which gave to these masses their hard slaty properties produced the flaglike lamine of the beds. Trap Rocks.—Of these there are distinctly two classes: 1, Bedded, and synchronous with the formation of the older rocks’; 2, Posteriorand intrusive. Of the former there are no examples like those cited in West Salop, Montgomery, and Radnor, (see former memoirs,) of alternation with the strata of the Silurian system, being all confined to the Cam brian rocks. The tract extending from Fishguard to St. David’s and the Isle of Skomer offer illustrative examples of both these classes of trap. In addition to the varieties of sienite, compact felspar rock (corneen of De la Beche), greenstone, &c., of which these rocks are composed, the author has detected crystallized chromate of iron and albite in St. David’s Head,—small veins of copper ore also occur between Solfach and St. David’s. Among the more remarkable changes effected by the intrusive trap, he adverts to jaspidified schists inclosed between a large bifurcated mass of trap proceeding from Trafgarn. Having traced the Silurian system in a course of 120 miles from the Wrekin to Caer- marthen in ridges more or less parallel running from N.E.to S.W., the author has shown in former memoirs that this strike of the strata uni- formly coincides with the direction of linear outbursts of volcanic mat- ter. In Caermarthenshire vast dislocations and transverse breaks are exhibited by which the strata are for short distances thrown into E. and W. directions, but on the whole the south-westerly course is maintained. A ridge of intrusive rocks recently discovered, ranging between the rivers Towey and Taf (Castel, Cogan, &c.), having the same course, serves to explain how that dominant direction has been there preserved. In entering Southern Pembroke, however, the whole of the strata from the coal measures to the Cambrian rocks are thrown into an E, and W. direction, accompanied by violent contortions and powerful faults ; whilst in northern parts of the county the old N.E. and S.W. direction prevails. As these converging lines are accom- panied by linear, parallel ridges of trap rock, the author is confirmed in his belief that the forces which evolved the latter have been the proxi- mate cause of such directions; and he further refers the extraordinary convulsions and dismemberments to which the strata in Pembroke have been subjected, to the interference of two great lines of ele- vation dependent upon volcanic activity. In accordance with phe- nomena observed in other parts of S. Wales, it is remarked that all the superficial detritus is of local origin, the southern or lower part of the county being partially strewed over with the debris of the rocks which rise into mountains on the north coast. After some observa- tions on the blown sands, and the period of their formation, the author recapitulates the value of the Pembrokeshire coast sections in exhi- biting the “ Silurian System” precisely in the same geological position assigned to it from examinations in the interior ; and concludes by stating it as his opinion, that as this one county is shown to contain rocks in the true coal measures and in the old red sandstone, as well 566 Geological Society. as in the Silurian and Cambrian systems, which from their lithological characters have been mistaken for “‘ greywacke,” the use of that word as expressing the age of rocks is no longer consistent with the ad- vanced state of geological science, and that if used, the name should either be rigidly restricted to some of the very oldest sedimentary de- posits, or simply employed as a mineralogical definition of peculiar grits which actually reoccur in strata formed in many succesive epochs. Feb. 3.—A paper on “ The Gravel and Alluvia of S. Wales and Siluria as distinguished from a northern drift covering Lancashire, Cheshire, N. Salop, and parts of Worcester and Gloucester,” by R. I, Murchison, Esq., V.P.G.S., was read. The first part of this memoir describes the detritus in the Welsh and Silurian territories, The surface of this region is completely exempt from the debris of any of those far-transported rocks which constitute what has been called ‘‘diluvium’”’ in other parts of England; all the loose materials in S. Salop, Herefordshire, and the adjoining Welsh counties having been derived from the Silurian and trap rocks of the adjacent mountains. These mountains range from N.E. to S.W., presenting inclined planes to the S.E., on the surfaces of which the broken materials are distributed. Four of the rivers which descend from the higher parts of Wales flow to the S.E. in accord- ance with the prevailing lines of drift, traversing the ridges of Silurian rocks through fissures which have resulted from dislocations of the strata. These are the Teme, the Onny, the Lug, and the Wye, all tributaries of the Severn. That great river, on the contrary, does not follow the “ line of drift” to the S.E., but escapes from the mountains to the north by a lateral gorge under the Breidden Hills; and after a circuit in the Vale of Shrewsbury passes eastward through a narrow transverse rent in the upper Silurian rocks and coal measures of Coal- brook Dale; and taking its final course southward, from Bridgnorth to the Bristol Channel, forms the eastern limit of the country covered by the Welsh or Silurian detritus. The drainage of the Teme, Onny, Lug, and Wye, is described in detail, with a view of showing, that in the valleys in which these rivers descend from the mountains, the ma- terials change with each successive ridge, the larger fragments being transported only short distances ; and that as the gravel advances into the plains, it becomes more finely comminuted ; Herefordshire and the low countries being chiefly covered with local debris of the old red sandstone. The author specially distinguishes this drift, which is extensively spread over valleys and slopes, and sometimes found in high situations, from the detritus which hasbeen carried down by rivers under the atmosphere, conceiving that the former accumulations have been washed down the surfaces of the inclined strata; because wherever the latter dip tothe S.E.,so are the materials invariably found to have been propelled in that direction. In no instance has any fragment been found on the west which can have been derived from rocks on the east. He therefore believes that at those periods when the Silu- rian and older rocks were raised from beneath the waters, great quantities of coarse and fine detritus were drifted down these slopes ; — and that as the rocks on which the loose materials have been depo- Geological Society. 567. sited are replete with dislocations, and penetrated at many points by ridges of trap rock, it is to be inferred, that during and after the evolution of this volcanic matter, great and successive elevations of the bottom of the sea took place, throwing up the drifts to the various heights at which we now find them. As soon as the land was raised from beneath the sea, the present rivers, it is conceived, began to flow ; passing through the ridges by gorges produced by great lateral cracks the result of elevation ; and that these streams have since merely trans- ported to short distances those broken materials which were previous- ly gathered together by subaqueous drift. To prove that the drifted matter of each district within this region may be referred to disturb- ances purely local, it is shown that although wherever the hills have been elevated from N.E. to S.W. the lines of drift are from N.W. to S.E., yet in those contiguous tracts which have been elevated in other directions the course of the drift changes immediately with the varia- tion of the strike. Thus on the exterior margin of the great coal-field of S. Wales vast quantities of materials resulting from the breaking up of the carboniferous series have been dispersed to the N.E., N., and N. West, directions excentric from the broken margin of that elevated tract. In Pembrokeshire, again, where the prevalent lines of strike are from E. to W., the drift has been carried southwards. Conceiving that the great masses of these drifts have been formed at various pe- riods under the sea, either in gulfs, estuaries, or straits, and have been raised up at different periods when the solid strata were elevated, the author then proceeds to consider the probable conditions of the surface of this portion of the country for some time after such emer- sion, and yet at a period comparatively remote. He instances many flat embayed tracts which, from the equable surface of the sand and gravel, are supposed to have been for some time under water, occu- pying lakes which have been drained by the deepening of gorges is- suing from these bays ; since it is shown that a very slight difference of level in the beds of rivers at several gorges would effectually bar up the present streams, and pond them back into lacustrine expanses, Hence he infers that slight additional movements of the land, aided by the excavating process of the rivers themselves, may have operated in draining these flat tracts. A large part of Herefordshire watered by the Wye is supposed to have been under such waters, which have since escaped by the picturesque gorges of Ross and Chepstow. The Vale of Radnor is a similar case ; now drained only by a feeble rivulet, But the clearest examples of successive lacustrine expanses are ex- hibited in the descent of the Teme; first in the tract still called « Wigmore Lake ;” from whence the superabundant waters have escaped through the upper Silurian rocks in the gorge of Downton on the rock; and next in various expansions and contractions between Ludlow andthe Abberley Hills, where they have been again barred up by that ridge until the gorge at Knightwick Bridge was deepened, opening out a channel for their escape into the great Valley of the Severn. The finely levigated sand, marl, and mud, at small heights above the present stream point to this anterior lacustrine condition. 568 Geological Society. The period of the finai desiccation of these river-lakes, and the reduc- tion of the rivers to their present channel, is supposed to have been contemporaneous with that recent elevation which in raising the land to greater heights brought up large adjacent portions of the bottom of the sea, and to the consideration of which the second part of the me- moir is devoted under the head of ‘ northern drift.” In the region of Welsh and local drift attention is specially called to the length of time during which existing causes have been in un- disturbed action, as proved by the magnificent mass of Travertino formed and still forming at the Southstone rock ; whilst he also points to the discovery of shell marl in a bog near Montgomery, containing several species of Lymnea, which has evidently been formed in the manner described by Mr. Lyell in his memoir on the marl loch of Forfarshire. Northern Drift.—Detritus differing entirely from that which covers Wales and Siluria, is spread over large parts of Lancashire, Cheshire, and N. Shropshire, ranging up to the edges of the region above mentioned. The materials of this drift consist of granites, porphyries, and other hard rocks, which have been derived from the mountains of Cumberland, a few perhaps from those of Scotland. The drift further contains much sand and clay, with many pebbles of smaller size, which varies exceedingly in different districts. Thus, in N. Salop, near the great outlier of lias, described by the author*, fragments of that formation are added to the mass, and as it advances to the south the materials become still more varied ; the fragments, however, of the northern granite and porphyries always existing to identify the drift. Its distinguishing feature is the reoccurrence at intervals of large blocks or boulders, of northern origin, a large proportion of which lie at various heights on the slopes of the mountains skirting the N. Welsh coal-field, and encumbering the northern flanks of the Wrekin and of Haughmond Hill; while a few have been propelled to the edge of the Silurian rocks south of Shrewsbury. They prevail in vast quantities in the high inland district between Wolverhampton and Bridgnorth, from which latitude they begin to diminish in size ; but coarse gravel, composed of the same materials, is prolonged south- wards like the tail of a delta through Worcestershire, until it dies away in the fine silt and gravel of the Vale of Gloucester. Not a fragment of any such detritus enters into the region of Welsh and Si- lurian drift ; but in the environs of Shrewsbury certain mounds of the latter are capped by clay and boulders of the northern drift, which is thereby shown to be of subsequent formation. The best proof of the recency of the epoch during which this northern drift was accumulated is, that it contains sea shells of existing species. These were formerly noticed at Preston, in Lancashire, by Mr. Gilhertson ; and by the author at the height of 350 feet above the sea. In Cheshire they have been observed by Sir P. Egerton at heights of about 70 feet+. Mr. Trimmer has cited similar shells on Moel Tryfanet, now ascertained to be 1392 feet above the sea, and has recently detected them near * Proceedings of the Geological Society, Vol. IT. p. 114. + Ibid., Vol, Il. p- 189. t Ibid., Vol. I. p. 331. Geological Society. 569 Shrewsbury. Mr.'Murchison has collected evidence of their diffusion over a wide area in Shropshire, tracing them at intervals from Maring- ton Green, N.W. of Shrewsbury, by the Wrekin and Wellington, to the high grounds between Bridgnorth and Wolverhampton, at least 60 miles inland, and at heights varying from 300 to 600 feet. He has also been enabled to add several species to those mentioned in any former list. These shells having been examined by good conchologists (including Dr. Beck, of Copenhagen,) prove to be identical with spe- cies now inhabiting adjacent seas, viz. Buccinum reticulatum, B. un- datum, Dentalium entalis (Linn.), Littorina littorea, Tellina soldula ? Venus , Astarte ——, Cardium tuberculatum, C. edule, Cyprina islandica, Turritella ungulina (Beck), (Turbo ungulinus, Linn.,) Donax or Mactra. It was a prevalent belief that large boulders were usually lodged upon the surface of the gravel and sand; but cuts which have been made through mounds of these materials at Norton, near Shrewsbury, have proved that the larger blocks occur at considerable depths below the surface mixed up with shells, sand, gravel, and clay. This is the locality described by Mr. Trimmer* as indicating the exist- ence of dry land anterior to the deposit of the shells and gravel, by the occurrence of a peat bog, which he supposed to have been formed out of the remains of a submerged forest ; the stumps of the trees of which were said to be still rooted in their parent soil, and standing in their growing posture. Having examined the spot (accompanied by Dr. Du Gard), Mr. Murchison has obtained clear proofs that the sup- posed trees were stakes with sharpened points which had been driven down into a patch of subjacent clay; the other remains consisting of a plank and smaller stakes which had been laid horizontally. This woodwork formed the support of the old road, which in making the new one had been cut down beneath the ancient foundations. The patch of clay into which the piles were driven, lying in a depression between two hillocks of gravel, must have given rise to a wet and boggy spot, which having been rendered passable by piling and dam- ming, the dry materials of the contiguous hillocks were doubtless shovelled in to complete the road, thus giving rise to the deceptive appearances of marine drift overlying the supposed forest. Though the collocation of the boulders, sand, gravel, loam, clay, and shells is in parts very irregular, yet the materials are sometimes finely laminated: the whole, it is presumed, may have been thus brought together at the bottom of a sea, as the mass is not unlike many raised sea-beaches, with one of which, at the mouth of Carlingford Bay, Ire- land, recently visited by Professor Sedgwick and himself, the author compares it. From the evidences afforded by these recent shells it is inferred, that the tracts covered by them must have lain under the sea during the modern period; whilst from the continuation of the granitic drift from the high grounds east of Bridgnorth into the Vale of Worcester, Mr. Murchison conceives that the sea must at the same time have covered the Valley of the Severn from Bridgnorth to the Bristol * Proceedings of the Geological Society, Vol. II. p, 200. 570 Geological Society. Channel, thus separating Wales and Siluria on one side, from En- gland on the other. Having shown that the Welsh and Silurian mountains were partly raised at an earlier period, he points out the Abberley and Malvern Hills, as constituting the western side of a strait of the sea, the eastern shore of which was the Cotteswold Hills. He deduces the principal proof of the preexistence of this eastern coast from the observations of Mr. H. Strickland, which show the transport from the east and north-east of fluviatile and land shells mixed with the remains of extinct quadrupeds in banks of coarse gravel, following the drainage of the Avon near to where that river empties itself into the Severn; and he asserts, that the terrace-like deposits of Cropthorne are exactly those which would have been ac- cumulated at the mouth of a river, if the materials had been carried onwards beneath the waters of the adjoining strait of the sea, illus- trating his views by the analogies of other rivers and estuaries. He therefore presumes that the deposit of Cropthorne may have been coeval with that of the northern drift. After an explanation of the theories hitherto proposed to account for the transport of large boul- ders to distant points, the author states that the evidences in question seem to him to be subversive of the diluvial hypothesis which imagines that. the blocks were carried over the land, it being proved that here, at least, they were accumulated under the sea. He does not think we have yet been furnished with a full explanation of any method by which such blocks can have been transported to distances of 100 miles: for supposing them to have been derived from the shores of Cumberland, and that they extended in a delta from thence, it would appear that assuming the slightest degree of inclination, viz. 3°,—which could give adequate momentum to the ordinary power of running water acting upon these loose materials,—the southern part of the delta (even at a distance of 50 miles from Cumberland, ) must, as suggested by Mr. Lonsdale, have lain at the vast depth of i3,000 feet beneath the sea, in which case all Wales would have been equally submerged ; though we have proof that the mountains of that country had risen to acertain height previous to the accumulation of the northern drift. It is further submitted that under the physical features of the region when this drift was formed, i, e. when a great arm and strait of the sea separated England from Wales, submarine currents alone could not have been powerful enough to propel these large blocks, though the question is one which ought to be more completely disposed of by those versed in the laws of dynamics. Mr. Murchison next takes into consideration the theory of the transport by ice. After allusion to the views of Esmarck, De l’Arrivi¢re, Haussman, &c., it is shown that Mr. Lyell has thrown great additional light on this subject by his observations on Sweden and the Alps, by which it really ap- pears that under certain limitations ‘ice floes” may have been “‘ vere cause” in the transport of large blocks, depositing them under seas and lakes at great distances from the source of their origin. In the Salopian case, however, though it is possible such means may also have been employed, there are many arguments which weaken the application of the hypothesis, such as the rounded and worn exterior Geological Society. 571 of the boulders, and their diminution in size and quantity from north to south. It might also be contended that we have no right to infer the existence of a colder climate in our latitudes in those days ; but this objection does not appear unanswerable, since it might be replied, that if at the period of the northern drift England, Ireland, and the continent of Europe were united by a lofty chain of mountains, there might have been a temperature sufficient to have formed annually large bodies of ice on the shores of Cumberland. Passing however from this difficult question of the method of transport, Mr. Murchison states that the greatest of the anomalies hitherto presented by these boulders is obviated, when we dispel from our minds the idea of their having been carried over preexisting lands. Having once ascertained that large distributions of them took place under the sea, the different heights at which we now find them may, he supposes, be satisfactorily accounted for, by movements of elevation and depression acting upon the bed of the sea with unequal measures of intensity, raising up shells, gravel, and boulders which were accumulated at the same period, to the respective levels which they now occupy, doubtless producing many of the cracks and fissures with which the solid strata are replete, and leaving denuded valleys between the points so elevated. Feb. 24.*—A paper was first read, entitled “‘ Observations on a Patch of red and variegated Marls, containing Fossil Shells, at Colly- hurst, near Manchester,” by J. Leigh, Esq., and E. W. Binney, Esq., and communicated by Roderick Impey Murchison, Esq., F.G.S. Manchester stands on a slightly elevated platform of upper new red sandstone ; but the country to the north-west, north, and east of the town rises to a considerable height, and is traversed by the valleys of the Irwell, the Irk, and the Medlock, which furnish the only natural sections of, the district. The formations exhibited in these valleys, and supposed to extend under Manchester, are, first and lowest, the car- boniferous group; secondly, the lower red sandstone and marls ; thirdly, the magnesian limestone ; fourthly, the lower red marl; fifthly, the upper red sandstone; sixthly, the upper red marl; and seventhly, the superficial detritus. The principal object of the authors being to describe the upper red marl, they notice briefly the characters of the other deposits. The accumulations of superficial detritus are sometimes thirty feet thick, capping nearly all the high ground, and extending over the val- leys. In the lower part they consist of water-worn fragments of gra- nite, greenstone, porphyry, claystone, mountain limestone, and coal measures, imbedded in sand ; and in the upper, of stiff blue clay, containing partially rounded fragments of the same rocks but of greater size. Portions of the lower red sandstone and marl are some- times found, but none of the magnesian limestone. Blocks of granite, weighing two or three tons, occuron the summit of some of the hills which surround the Irwell and the Irk, The lower red sandstone, the magnesian limestone, and lower red marl are exposed at Worsley Mills and at Stockport, dipping conform- * The Anniversary Proceedings of Feb. 19, will be found at p. 310, in our Number for April. 572 Geological Society. ably with the coal measures ; but at the latter locality they are stated to be overlaid unconformably by the upper new red sandstone, The immediate vicinity of Manchester consists of upper new red sandstone, occupying the cavity formed by a flexure in the underlying deposits, and is generally supposed to be unconformable to them. It is very soft when first exposed, but hardens by exposure to the atmo- sphere ; and is occasionally marked by belts and nodules of white sand, and in the lower part contains rounded fragments of granite, quartz, and other older rocks. No organic remains have been no- ticed in it. The upper red marl is exposed only at Collyhurst, about a mile to the north-east of the Manchester Exchange, in the old road to Blake- ley; but it has there yielded a greater number of fossils than has been found in any other bed of the superior divisions of the new red sand- stone group in England. The deposit extends about a hundred yards, and at one of the points examined presented the following details : Top a. Variegated marls, no organic remains .... 6 inches. b. Strong, red marl, traversed near its centre by a thin layer of fragile bivalve shells... 5 —— c. Light-coloured, calcareous marl, marked with lines and spots of a beautiful red... 3 —— d. Light-coloured, calcareous, strong marl, containing an immense number of imper- fect casts of bivalves and perfect univalves 5 —— When the marl is first excavated it crumbles under the touch, but after exposure for a short time, it is fractured with difficulty. e. Clay, striped red and white, and containing GADts OF Dayal Ves igi Gh Litera aes teste ar- Cac's 4—— f. Light-coloured marl, similar to No. 4, and inclosing numerous casts of bivalves and LINIVALVES: w1oik)e ie -lole lsteteieedoks canucteels 3 — g. Variegated marl, with an immense number of univalves and bivalves, 2 inches ..... 2— h. Indurated red marl, mottled with streaks of a greenish colour. The upper part contains numerous casts of large bivalves, and the light-coloured streaks also inclose casts of bivalves and univalves. Few shells are found below the depth of one foot, though the author had the bed penetrated to the depth of 29 feet, when an influx of water prevented them from boring any further. The rhomboidal fracture, so characteristic of the red marl, was very observable in this ibedo: stool te isteloRre > wttietnie te -. 29 feet. With respect to the geological position of these fossiliferous marls, the authors are fully satisfied that the deposit reposes on the upper Geological Society. 573 new red sandstone by which the marls are surrounded, though, from the covered nature of the ground, the connexion of the two forma- tions cannot be ascertained. In mineral aspect the lowest beds at Collyhurst are said to agree with the upper red marl of Lincolnshire and Cheshire, and to be distinguished from it only by the presence of fossils and the absence of salt ; while the Collyhurst strata differ from the lower red marl, in colour, fracture, and the organic remains. In accounting for the presence of these fossiliferous marls in the situation described, and their absence from the top of the new red sandstone in the immediate neighbourhood, the authors suppose that the marls were deposited in a hollow of the new red sandstone, and to have been, therefore, protected from denudation. A notice, by Francis Offley Martin, Esq., inclosing communications from Col. Brown and Lieut. Laurence, of the Rifle Brigade, and Mr. Stevens, on the streams of sea water which flow into the land in the island of Cephalonia, was next read. These communications were procured by Mr. Martin at. the request of Mr. Lyell. Lieut. Laurence’s letter is dated 31st of May, 1835, and contains an extract from an account sent to him by Mr. Stevens of the na- ture, excayation, and the operation of the stream. The length of the channel made for conducting the water was 20 yards and its width 3 feet ; and at the end of the channel a pit was made nearl 100 square yards in extent, and to the depth of about 4 feet below the level of the sea. On opening the sluice a stream of 150 square inches rushes into the pit with a velocity of 20 feet a second, and down a channel in the form of a segment of 4th of a circle of 18 feet diameter. A constant discharge of this stream raises the water in the pit to within 2 feet of the top of the arched channel. The stream escapes through the fissures in the pit, but the direction which it afterwards takes has not been well ascertained, though shafts have been sunk for that purpose. In these shafts water of the same de- scription with that in the pit is found, rising and falling in the same manner. Mr. Laurence also states that when the sluice-gate is shut down after a very considerable discharge of sea water into the pit, the water in the pit falls a few inches lower than it was previously to the discharge ; but is afterwards raised to the usual level by the freshwater springs. Mr. Stevens’s letter, dated the 28th August, 1835, gave an account of the making of the excavation, and states that the experience of a year and a half had proved that the stream is not liable to any perio- dical change. Col. Brown’s communication bears date the 27th of August, 1835, and gives an account of the physical features of the island, the nature of the excavation, and the probable manner by which the subterra- nean current is disposed of. On the eastern side of the harbour of Argostoli the country rises abruptly from the shore to a considerable elevation, and then more gradually until it is lost in one of the great ridges which intersect the island; but on the western side the narrow peninsular ridge at 574 Geological Society. the foot of which Argostoli is built, nowhere exceeds 400 feet in height, sloping gradually towards the sea, and is surrounded by com- paratively shallow water. The whole of the ridge consists apparently of coarse limestone, presenting on the surface large, detached blocks. Col. Brown’s account of the excavation agrees with those already given. He notices the springs of fresh water, and the fact, that when the sluice is first shut the pool is drained to a much lower level than that at which it afterwards stands, and this phenomenon he conceives may be explained on the principle of natural siphons. He says that there are three other openings on opposite sides of the promontory, through which sea-water flows into the land, and he is of opinion that there may be many more. With respect to the question what becomes of the water, Col. Brown has always believed that the streams are conducted to subterranean fires, and that the earthquakes so common in the island are caused by the expansion of the gases generated by the action of those fires on the sea water. A notice accompanying rock specimens from the caves of Bally- bunian, on the coast of Kerry, by Lieut. Col. W. H. Sykes, F.G.S., was then read. The author states that his principal object in bringing this commu- nication before the Society is to induce geologists to examine a part of Ireland seldom visited, but which he conceives to be highly deserv- ing of attention. The coast of Kerry, in the neighbourhood of Ballybunion, presents a series of cliffs varying from 100 to 150 feet in height, and is in- dented by numerous bays. The stratification consists of several feet of debris, composed of angular fragments of silicious rocks and earth ; a bed of alum shale follows, breaking into rhombs; then a stratum of lignite or carbonaceous schist, and another of iron shale. These strata are occasionally repeated, and said, on the authority of Mr. Ainsworth, to rest on limestone. A principal feature in these beds is a disposition to separate into rhombs; and the clifls in several places present the solid angles pro- jecting beyond the vertical line of the cliffs, while the roof of some of the caves is groined like the intersection of Gothic arches. The general inclination of the strata is about 13° to the east, but it is frequently altered by faults, and sometimes presents anticlinal dips. ‘Or the exact age of the beds the author offers no opinion, but he thinks that it is not posterior to the carboniferous series. Among the specimens which accompanied the memoir were some from the west end of the Isle of Innisfallen, in the Lake of Killarney. The strata at that point consist of narrow vertical and alternating ridges of asilicious rock and limestone : the former projecting beyond the surface of the latter. A paper was last read, entitled, “ An Account of some fossil vege- table Remains found in the sandstone which underlies the lowest bed of the carboniferous Limestone, near Ballisadiere, in the County of Sligo, Ireland,” by Sir Alexander Crichton, M.D., F.GS., &c. Geological Society. 575 In the county of Sligo there are no coal deposits, the nearest being the Arigna coal-field, in the county of Leitrim. The bed of sand- stone containing the plants is well exhibited, resting upon gneiss, with which it is stated to dip conformably, and is covered by the mountain limestone. The state of the plants prevented the author from ascer- taining their generic characters, but the specimens consist principally of flattened stems covered occasionally with a thin coating of carbo- naceous matter. The lowest beds of limestone in this part of Ireland abound with corals, and contain nodules of chert; while the upper contain many shells, and are purer and better adapted for forming quicklime. The author then remarks on the great interval which must have taken place between the growth of the plants contained in the sandstone, which underlies the limestone, and of those which occur in the coal-measures resting upon it. March 9.—A paper was read, “ On the Remains of Mammalia found in the Sewalik Mountains, at the southern foot of the Hima- layas between the Sutluj and the Ganges,” by Capt. Cautley, F.G.S., and communicated by J. F. Royle, Esq., F.G.S. ‘ The range of mountains from which the remains described in this paper were obtained, extends from the Sutlej to the Burhampooter and the district of Cooch Behar. Its general direction near the Sutluj is N.W. and S.E., but on approaching the Burhampooter it is many points nearer direct E. and W. It is either connected with theHima- layas by a succession of low mountains, or is separated from them by valleys varying in breadth from three to ten miles, the principal being the Deyra valley, between the Ganges and the Jumna, and theKearda and the Pinjore, between the Jumna and the Sutluj. The breadth of the range is from six to eight miles ; and the loftiest peaks do not exceed 3000 feet, the average height being from 2000 to 2500 above the level of the sea, or from 500 to 1000 above that of the adjacent plains. The only roads by which the range can be passed follow the line of the rivers which flow through gorges flanked by pre- cipitous cliffs, sometimes crowned by inaccessible pinnacles, on the top of which is usually a solitary fir-tree. As the range is not known to the present inhabitants or to geographers by a distinct name, Capt. Cautley has been induced to call it the Sewalik, a term by which the portion between the Jumna and the Ganges was formerly known*; and he states that he is anxious to give to it a distinct ap- pellation to avoid the use of the indefinite terms Lower Hills and Sub- Himalayas. The formation of which the range is composed between the Sutluj and the Ganges, the portion personally examined by the author, con- sists of alternating beds of conglomerate, sandstone, marl, and clay, inclined at angles varying from 15° to 35°. The succession of the beds is irregular, the marl prevailing to the west and the conglomerate to the east of the Jumna. * Smith’s Exotic Botany, vol. i. p.9. Dow's History of India. The name is also used in some writings in the possession of the high priest re- siding at Deyra. The word is a corruption of Shibwalla, from the district between the Ganges and the Jumna having been the residence of Shib. 576 Geological Society. The beds of conglomerate, or in the language of the author, of shingle, are of enormous thickness, and are composed of pebbles of granite, gneiss, mica-slate, hornblende-slate, and trap, derived appa- rently from the Himalayas, and are either loosely aggregated or ce- mented by clay and carbonate of lime. The sandstone consists of grains of quartz and scales of mica, ce- mented by oxide of iron or carbonate of lime. The colour presents various shades of red and grey ; and the state of induration differs in proportion to the quantity of the cementing matter, which sometimes gives the stone a crystalline appearance. It is occasionally used as a building material and in some instances has resisted for a long time the action of the atmosphere. Carbonaceous matter is of common occurrence in the sandstone, either in fragments exhibiting the struc- ture of dicotyledonous plants, or as grains disseminated throughout the stone in nearly equal proportions with the sand. Carbonaceous matter exists also in the marl, and in one instance Capt. Cautley noticed it in the conglomerate. It has never yet been found in suf- ficient quantity to be of economical importance. At the Kalowala Pass, one of the entrances into the Deyra valley, the author discovered in a bed of yellow and red sand elliptical masses of sandstone coated by a thin layer of carbonaceous matter. The marl or clay conglomerate is described as consisting of frag- ments of indurated clay cemented by clay, sand, and carbonate of lime. It is exceedingly tough, and is less easily acted upon by run- ning water than the other strata. The only point at which trap has been observed is in the neigh- bourhood of Nahun, where it has been noticed by Dr. Falconer. Soda effloresces on the surface of the shingle and sandstone, and selenite occurs occasionally in the clay. The distribution of the organic remains in the district between the Jumna and the Ganges, Capt. Cautley states to be as follows, the greater part of the fossils having been obtained at the Kalowala Pass. Conglomerate or Shingle Beds.—Lignite, scarce. Sandstone.—Trunks of dicotyledonous trees in great abundance, lignite, and remains of reptiles. Marl.—Pachydermata : teeth, and remains of a species of Anthra- cotherium. Carnivora: genera doubtful, but some of the teeth corre- spond with those of the Bear. Rodentia: Rat, and a small variety of Castor. Ruminantia : Deer, more species than one. Solipede, teeth of a Horse. Gavial and Crocodile, teeth and bones in abundance. Emys and Trionyx, fragments of. Pisces, vertebre and perhaps scales. Shells, freshwater genera. The district between the Jumna and the Sutluj consists of the same series of shingle or conglomerate, sand, clay, and marl; but the shin- gle is less abundant, and differs in being composed of pebbles of va- Geological Society. 577 rious kinds of clayslate and quartz, and the marl is exposed only at Nahun, where it contains the same organic remains as in the Kalowala Pass. From Nahun to the plains there is a succession of sandstones and clays, dipping on an average about 20° tothe north. In the neighbourhood of that town the sandstone is hard and used for build- ing; but it becomes soft on approaching the plains. The clays are stated to be more or less rich in Testacea, and the sandstone in re- mains of Mammalia. The large collections of bones obtained by Capt. Cautley were found partly lying on the slopes among the ruins of fallen cliffs, and partly in situ in the sandstone; and he is of opinion that the former have been, in a great measure, preserved by the sandstones in immediate contact with the bones, being much harder and more ferruginous than in the general mass. The following is a list of the remains which had been determined at the time the memoir was written. Mastodon, elephant, rhinoceros, hippopotamus, hog, horse, Ox, elk, deer, several varieties ; carnivora, canine and feline ; crocodile, gavial, emys, trionyx, and fishes ; and portions of undescribed mam- malia. The remains of all these animals are in great abundance, with the exception of the Horse and Carnivora ; but the bones of the head are better preserved than those of the trunk or the extremities. Some- times the fractured bones have admitted of being joined, though the surfaces were coated with calcareous spar. In assigning an age to the formation composing the Sewalik moun- tains, Capt. Cautley adopts the views of his friend Dr. Falconer, who: in a notice read before the Asiatic Society of Calcutta, considered the deposit to be synchronous with that from which Mr. Crawfurd obtained the remains near Prome, on the banks of the Irawadi, there being an agreement in the organic remains. The author then offers some remarks on the Mastodon elephantoides and M. latidens, and in consequence of his having found jaws in which the front teeth are not to be distinguished from the teeth of M. latidens, and the rear from the teeth of M. elephantoides, he conceives that the distinc- tion established on detached teeth will be found to be erroneous. March 23.—A paper was first read, entitled, “ A Description of various Fossil Remains of three distinct Saurian animals discovered in the autumn of 1834, in the Magnesian Conglomerate on Durdham Down, near Bristol.” By Henry Riley, M.D. and Mr. Samuel Stutchbury; and communicated by Charles Lyell, Esq., P.G.S. The conglomerate in which these Saurian remains were discovered rests upon the edge of inclined strataof mountain limestone, filling up the irregularities of their surface, and consists of angular fragments of the limestone cemented by a dolomitic paste. The thickness of the deposit at the point where the remains were discovered does not exceed twenty feet. Of the three animals described in the paper, two belong to a genus for which the author proposes the name of Paleosaurus, and the third to one which they have called Thecodontosaurus. Third Series. Vol. 8. No. 50, Supplement, June 1836. 31L 578 Geological Society. The characters of the genus Paleosaurus are derived from the teeth, which are described as being carinated laterally, and finely ser- rated at right angles to the axis. They are stated to differ from those of all the Saurians known to the authors: and as the teeth in their possession exhibit minor marked characters, they are induced to consider that they belonged te two species, which they have named P. cylindricum and P., Platyodon. The genus Thecodontosaurus is likewise founded on the struc- ture of the teeth, and their having been deposited in distinct alveoli. Among other remains in the Museum of the Bristol Institution is the right ramus of a lower jaw, 34 inches long and 14 in the greatest depth, from the summits of the teeth to the under rise, consisting of the dental bone, containing 21 teeth, with portions of the sub- angular and complementary bones, and perhaps traces of the oper- cula. The alveolar groove for the reception of the teeth is formed by two ridges of nearly equal height, the teeth being deposited in it, in distinct alveoli, to nearly half theirlength. The teeth somewhat re- semble in shape a surgeon’s abscess-lancet, being acutely pointed and flattened ; while the anterior edge is also curved, but concave and strongly serrated, the serrature being directed towards the apex of the tooth. The middle teeth are the largest, rising not less than a quarter of an inch above the socket. They all possess a conical hol- low, and in a specimen belonging to the Rev. D. Williams a young tooth is well exhibited in one of the alveolar cavities. From these cha- racters the authors infer that the jaw belonged to a Saurian, but not to the great genus Lacerta of Linnzus as reformed by Cuvier by re- jecting the Crocodiles and Salamanders. They further infer from the shape and serrated edge of the teeth that it did not belong to the Crocodiles ; nor to the Lizards, whose alveolar inner edge is either wanting or much less elevated than the outer. They also show that it was not allied to the Monitors, because of the elevated inner alveolar edge, the distinct alveoli, the teeth remaining hollow and the formation of the new tooth in the same cell with the old one, as well as from the great number of the teeth. With respect to the Iguanas _ and Scinks they show that the fossil could not have belonged to them, in consequence of the distinct alveoli, the inner alveolar edge, and the form of the summit and serratures of the teeth: and that it differed from the Saurodon in having a ridge on the outside of the tooth with the edge crenated and of unequal length. Numerous other bones have been discovered, but as none of them were found in connexion with teeth, the authors hesitate to assign them to either of the genera which they have established. Among these remains the following are described : Vertebre possessing the peculiar characters, of having the centre of the body diminished one half in its transverse and vertical diameters so as to resemble an hour-glass; of a suture connecting the annular vart or body with the processes ; and in the extremities of the ver- tebra being deeply concave. These characters the author conceives distinguish the fossil vertebre from those of all recent Saurians. A nearly perfect chevron bone; ribs, one flat and imperfect, the Geological Society. 579 other round with a double head and a deep intercostal groove ; a cla- vicle ; portions of coracoids; a humerus, the articulatory extremities of which expand to nearly three times the diameter of the centre of the bone ; a humerus 7 inches long, 2 inches broad at the superior extremity, and 14 at its inferior ; two femurs, one nearly perfect, being 10 inches in length; part of an ischium; a tibia; a fibula; metacarpal or metatarsal bones, with penultimate and ungueal pha- langes. In conclusion the authors state that these remains afford further proof of the truth that the more ancient the strata the more the ani- mal remains differ from existing types. A memoir was afterwards read, “ On the Ossiferous Cavern of Yealm Bridge, 6 miles south-east from Plymouth.” By Capt. Mudge, Royal Engineers, F.G.S., F.R.S., &e. This cavern is situated in a mass of limestone adjoining the village of Yealmpton, near Yealm Bridge, and on the south side of the river. It has been long known, and though large quantities of the bones have been burnt in the limekiln, yet it was not till lately that its con- tents attracted the attention of the scientific observer. Mr. Bellamy, of Yealmpton, first detected their value, and Capt. Mudge in a visit to Devonshire in the autumn of last year collected the information detailed in the memoir, ‘‘ There were originally three openings into the cave, each about 12 feet above the river Yealm, and a few yards distant from each other. Large portions of the rock being removed for economical purposes, a considerable part of the cavern has been destroyed, and at the time of Capt. Mudge’s visit portions of only the eastern and western chambers remained. The former consisted of a descending shaft to the depth of 10 feet, which turned at right angles and again ascended to the surface, both the descent and the ascent being at an angle of 45°. Of the western cavern, a portion remained uninjured. From the present opening it takes a northerly direction for 43 feet, the height varying from 5 to 6 feet, and the breadth from 4to 5. It then turns westerly for 25 feet, the height varying from 5 to 12 feet, and the breadth from 31. to 5. The cave contained five, distinct, sedimentary deposits, and where they did not fill it to the roof the uppermost bed was covered by a layer of stalagmite. The order of the deposits was as follows : Top. Loam, containing bones and stones .......- 31 feet. Stiff whitish clay .... 22... ee eee eee e ee 24 PN Sete: 55 cissegings petue pt. ley sou Hed tgs on ste Ro naBy pilnieti’ 3+ Argillaceous sand .... 2.0. .2-2enn-ee vere 6 to 18. Animal remains have been found only in the uppermost bed, and the author, on the authority of Mr. Clift and Mr.Owen, states that they be- long to the elephant, rhinoceros, horse, ox, sheep, hyena, dog, wolf, fox, bear, hare, water-rat, and a bird of considerable size. Co- prolites also occur in the same bed. Many of the bones are splin- tered, chipped, and gnawed. Of the elephant only two teeth of a young animal have been preserved, and the remains of the rhinoceros are also rare, being confined to teeth and a doubtful bone, but those 3L2 580 Linnean Society. of the hyzna, particularly teeth, exceed in quantity all the bones of the other animals. Teeth and bones of the horse and ox are very abundant, but the remains of the bear are confined to teeth. It is however stated by the author that it is impossible now to determine what proportions the animals originally bore toeach other. The peb- bles found in the same bed with the bones are apparently derived from the confines of Dartmoor, and differ from those contained in the bed of the Yealm. In one part, where the roof is a little lower than usual, the limestone is beautifully polished, as if by the friction of the animals which inhabited the cave. There are many other caverns in the neighbourhood, but the one next in importance to that at Yealm Bridge is in the grounds at Ketley. The floor of this cavern rises but little above the present level of the river, and consists of gravel and pebbles corresponding with those in the bed of the Yealm. It has been ascertained that it does not contain bones, and Capt. Mudge therefore concludes that the caverns of Yealm Bridge and Ketley were exposed to very dif- ferent conditions when the elephant and the hyena inhabited the southern part of Devonshire. As far as regards space the accommo- dation in Ketley Cavern was much superior to that of Yealm Bridge Cave, and consequently it may be inferred that at the time when the hyenas inhabited the latter, they were prevented from entering the former either from its having been frequently flooded or permanently under water. ——- LINNEAN SOCIETY. May 24, 1836.—At the Anniversary Meeting held this day, His Grace the Duke of Somerset in the chair, previous to the usual business the Secretary, Dr. Boott, stated that the Society had lost by death during the past year the following 11 Fellows and 2 Associates, viz, Fellows —G. T. Burnett, Prof. of Botany in King’s College; A. Crouch, Esq.; George Harry, Baron Grey of Groby ; D. Hosack, Esq., M.D., F.R.S. ; E. Jennings, Esq.; J. Macculloch, Esq., M.D., F.R.S.; Mr. Wm. Malcolm; H. Phillips, Esq.; H. Sim, Esq. ; W. Smith, Esq., F.R.S.; Rev. G. A. Thursby, M.A., F.R.S. Associates.—Mr. T. Drummond ; Rev. J. T. Thomson. The Secretary then particularized, in the following terms, some of the deceased members : « Dr. Hosack, without attaining to or claiming any eminence as a botanist, was one of theearlier promoters of that science in America, and formeda botanic garden in theneighbourhood of New York, which was eventually purchased by the State or by one of the colleges of that city; and he undoubtedly would have anticipated many of the discoveries of later observers, had not his attention been neces- sarily drawn to medicine, from the distinguished reputation which he acquired as a physician. He visited Europe at an early period of life, and made the acquaintance of the more distinguished men of science in this country and in France ; and the grateful recollection he ever cherished of the reception he met with in Europe prompted that liberal hospitality to strangers for which he was always honour- Linnean Society. 581 ably distinguished. He was a generous patron of science and art; and one of those who stood prominently forward in giving that grateful reception to the distinguished leaders in one of the Arctic expeditions. It may be remembered that Sir J. Franklin and Dr. Richardson, and, I believe, Capt. Back, were hailed on their arrival at New York by the mayor and principal citizens of the city, and that they were conveyed to the confines of Canada free of expense, cheered by the sympathies of all around them,—one of those evi- dences which the heart affords of the cordiality and respect existing between America and England, whatever some writers may say of the contrary. Dr. Hosack published the life of his friend Gen. Clinton, and was the author of various papers on the medical and other branches of science. «I feel that this is not the place for doing full justice to the me- mory of Mr. Smith, for I am not aware that he particularly directed his attention to any branch of natural history ; but as the early, stre- nuous, and constant advocate of civil and religious liberty he is en- titled to the respect and admiration of all those who believe in the capacities of human nature for a progressive advancement in intel- lectual and moral power. It is well known that Mr. Smith was re- turned M.P. for Sudbury and Norwich for nearly half a century, and that towards the close of the last century, and up to a compara- tively late period of his life, he was one of what originally was com- paratively a small band, who, when liberal sentiments were obnoxious to a degree which I believe it to be impossible for us at the present time to conceive of, pleaded for the rights of humanity, when those rights were denied not only to the enslaved African, but to a large portion of the people of this country, especially to the conscientious Dissenter, who was at one time looked upon as hardly a loyal subject of therealm. To those who, in watching the changes which human institutions undergo in the progress of time, are convinced that a chastened and enlightened spirit of liberty, as it has become more and more developed, has in all times given additional dignity to hu- man nature, by enabling it to put forth those inherent energies, all- instructive of good, which, like the branches of the oak, acquire a hardy vigour and nobler growth as they are free to extend themselves in the liberal light and air of heaven,—to such an observer of the eventful period of the last half-century the name of Mr. Smith must often recur as one of the most unquestionable benefactors of man- kind. If not distinguished by any of the splendour of genius, or as standing prominently forward in the first ranks of public life, he was more honourably distinguished by the inflexible integrity of his character, the uniform liberality and consistency of his opinions, and the unobtrusive virtues of his private life,—characteristics which, if they failto give the widest and loudest development of fame, are yet sure of the truest and most lasting. Mr. Smith attained to an advanced period of life, and survived to see many of the great and benevolent objects which he advocated finally accomplished ; and I should say, that of the larger award of charity and justice which has been rendered to the Dissenters of this country, of which Mr. Smith was one, nota little of it may be said to have been owing 582 Linnean Society. to the evidence which his own life afforded of the peaceable disposi- tion, the unquestionable loyalty, the intelligence and high moral worth which belong to that large portion of the people of England. « In the death of Mr. Drummond we have to lament the loss of a very useful man ; one to whom we have been indebted for many years for many rare plants which he collected in the Rocky Moun- tains during his first expedition to North America, and in the valley of the Mississippi in his last visit to that continent. He was sent out principally through the} instrumentality of Sir William J. Hooker, for the purpose of making collections in all the depart- ments of natural history ; and thereare some present who know how well he accomplished the objects of his mission. His plants were purchased by several naturalists in this country, in France, and America; and I understand from Sir W. Hooker that indepen- dent of the sums he had successively paid towards the expenses of Mr. D.in America, and towards the support of his family in Scotland, there is a considerable balance due to his widow. Mr. Drummond died of fever last year at the Havannah; and I feel that his death is scarcely less disastrous than that of Mr. Douglas. « It does not seem to be sufficiently known that the natives of the colder regions inevitably run great hazard of sickness and death in resorting to climes of a high mean temperature. When it is recollected what a remarkable exemption from mortality has uni- formly characterized the arctic expeditions under Sir J. Ross, Sir E. Parry, Sir J. Franklin, and Captain Back, and what a frightful destruction of life followed the naval and military expe- ditions to the West Indies in the war of 1793, and how many ex- cellent men have successively perished in the fatal attempt to ex- plore Africa, it is an irresistible conclusion that a high mean tem- perature is most prejudicial to the health of those unaccustomed to its influence: and the fact, I believe, is satisfactorily explained by the more prolific sources of disease which may reasonably be supposed to exist in the teeming climes of the south, and the effect which a sudden change of temperature exerts on the hu- man body. When we reflect, for instance, that in this country the mean temperature is about 52°, and that we consequently have a vital energy equivalent to the production of 46° of animal heat to enable us to maintain the blood at its standard heat of 96°; and that a native of Great Britain, by resorting to a clime where the mean temperature is 75° or 80°, cannot accommodate himself at once to this great change of circumstances,—that is, with a power to generate 46°, he cannot at once lose this power, and generate only 21° or 16°, to put himself on a level with the condition of the native of a tropical clime,—it will be evident that if he falls under the influ- ence of the causes of fever, the disease must have in him a violenceand a precipitancy highly dangerousto life. I believe this fully explains the nature and fatality of what is called yellow fever ; a disease en- tirely unknown té the natives of the West Indies and the most south- ern states of North America. Dr. Ramsey of Charleston, South Ca- rolina, shows for a long series of years that the deaths by yellow fever in that city have been confined exclusively to strangers, and that no Intelligence and Miscellaneous Articles. 583 native physician or nurse was ever known to contract the disease. This liability to a fatal form of fever should at least induce great caution in those who resort to hot climates ; and had the principle on which the mortality in those climates depends been fully under- stood, we might for many years perhaps have reaped advantages from the labours of Mr. Drummond in the cause of science. We owe to him many interesting plants; and like his fellow-labourer Mr. Douglas, his name must ever be honourably associated with the botany of North America.” His Grace the Duke of Somerset was re-elected President ; E. Forster, Esq., Treasurer; Francis Boott, M.D., Secretary; and Richard Taylor, Esq., Under-Secretary; and the following five gentlemen were elected into the Council, in the room of others going out, agreeably to the By-Laws: viz. William Borrer, Esq.; John Bostock, M.D.; John George Children, Esq.; Archibald Menzies, Esq.; Rev. Thomas Rackett, M.A. XCIV. Intelligence and Miscellaneous Articles. ON THE PROPERTIES OF LIQUID CARBONIC ACID. CCORDING to M. Thilorier, this liquefied gas presents the strange and paradoxical fact of a liquid more expansible than the gases themselves: from 32° to 86° Fahr., its volume increases from 20 to 29, that is to say, that at 86° Fahr. the increase of volume is nearly equal to half the volume at 32° Fahr. Its expansion is four times greater than that of atmospheric air, which from 32° to 86° Fahr. only expands .3,°-, whilst the expansion of liquid carbonic acid on the same scale is 334. If the temperature of a tube containing a portion of liquid carbonic acid is raised, this liquid boils, and the empty space above the liquid is saturated with a greater or less quantity of vapour according to the elevation of the temperature. At 86° Fahr., the quantity of liquid at 32° Fahr. sufficient to saturate the empty space is represented by a portion of liquid equal to one third of the space in which the vaporisation has been effected. At 32° Fahr. the portion of liquid of saturation is only », of the space saturated. The pressure of the vapour formed by the liquefied gas from 32° to 86° Fahr., amounts from 36 to 73 atmospheres, which is equivalent to an increase of one atmosphere for every centigradedegree. It is important to observe that the weight or the density of the vapour increases in a much greater proportion than the pressure, and that the law of Mariotte is no longer applicable within the limits of the liquefaction. If the density of the vapour is taken for the base of the pressure, the pressure at 86° Fahr. will be equal to 130 atmospheres, whilst the manoscope will only indicate 73 atmospheres. If a tube of glass containing a portion of liquid anda portion of gas be heated, two contrary effects will take place: Ist, the liquid will augment by expansion ; 2nd, the liquid will diminish by vaporisation. The thermoscopic effects are very different according as the por- 584 Intelligence and Miscellaneous Articles. tion of liquid is greater or smaller to the portion of gas; the liquid in the tube will either expand, contract, or remain stationary. These anomalies furnished the means of verifying the numbers which the preceding researches had given on the expansion and vaporisa- tion. According to these numbers, the points of equilibrium above which the liquid increases and below which it diminishes on the addition of heat, result from such a proportion when empty or ful] that at zero the liquid occupies 4-3 of the wholetube. If the liquid at 32° Fahr. occupies one third of the tube it seems as a retrograde thermometer, of which the liquid increases by cold, and diminishes by heat. If the liquid at 32° Fahr. occupies two thirds of the tube it acts as a regular thermometer ; that is to say, the liquid increases and diminishes according to the laws of expansion. This thermo- meter is limited to 86° Fahr. as at this temperature the tube is en- tirely filled by the liquid. The specific gravity of this liquefied gas at 32° is 0-83, water being 1. It presents the singular phenomenon of a liquid which from — 68° to +86° Fahr., runs through the scale of densities from 0-90 to 0°60. It is insoluble in water, with which it does not mix ; but is soluble in alcohol, ether, naphtha, oil of turpentine, and sulphuret of carbon, in every proportion ; it is decomposed in the cold with effervescence by potassium; it does not act sensibly on lead, tin, iron, copper, &c. When a jet of liquid carbonic acid is directed upon the bulb of an alcohol thermometer, it falls rapidly to — 194° Fahr.; but the frigorific effects do not correspond with this decrease of tempera- ture, which is accounted for by the almost absolute want of con- ducting power, and the little capacity for heat of the gases; there- fore the intensity of the cold is enormous, but the sphere of action is limited in some measure to the point of contact. If the gases have little effect in the production of cold, such is not the case with the vapours, of which the conducting power and the capacity for heat are much greater. If zther, for instance, could be placed in the same conditions of expansion as the liquefied gas, a much greater frigorific effect would be obtained than by liquefied carbonic acid. To accomplish this object it is necessary to render zther explosive, which is easily effected by mixing ether with liquid carbonic acid. In this intimate combination of two liquids which dissolve one an- other in every proportion, the zther ceases to be a liquid perma- nent under the pressure of the atmosphere ; it becomes expansive similar to a liquefied gas, at the same time preserving its properties as a vapour, that is to say, its conductibility and capacity for caloric. The effects produced by a tube filled with explosible zther are remarkable; a few seconds were sufficient to congeal 772 grains of mercury in a glass vessel. On exposing the finger to the jet which escapes, the sensation is intolerable, and seems to extend much further than the point of contact. M. Thilorier intends to replace «ther by sulphuret of carbon; and it is probable the effects obtained will be still more powerful. Annales de Chimie, Dec. 1835. Intelligence and Miscellaneous Articles. 585 AMALGAMATION OF ZINC PLATES. In consequence of the great advantages pointed out by Mr. Fa- raday of employing amalgamated zinc plates in the voltaic pile, M. Masson recommends the tollowing simple and rapid method. After having placed on the zinc a little mercury, dilute sulphuric acid is poured upon it; the mercury is then rubbed over the surface of the zinc by means ofa piece of linen. The mercury spreads over the surface with great facility, and the amalgamation is very rapid: a small quantity of dilute acid should be added from time to time; this appears to act as a cleanser to the zinc, for in forming a vol- taic circuit with only one element, the operation does not go on so well or so quickly.— Annales de Chimie, November 1835. CRYSTALLIZED OXICHLORIDE OF ANTIMONY. M. Malaguti observes that when a large quantity of water is added to a solution of protochloride of antimony, there isimmediately formed a very white and bulky precipitate, and which, thrown upon a filter and washed, constitutes the powder of algaroth. This, according to Grouvelle, is composed of 2 atoms of protoxide and | atom of pro- tochloride of antimony. If, instead of filtering the precipitate, it is suffered to remain in the fluid from which it is precipitated, for 30 or 40 hours, it contracts considerably, and is converted into a thick crystalline deposit. The supernatant liquor being poured off, the crystals are to be washed and dried by exposure to the air. The crystals thus procured are small, white, brilliant prisms, decom- poseable into oxide of antimony by boiling in water, by continued washing, or by an alkaline carbonate; they are entirely soluble in nitric acid ; they fuse by the heat of a common lamp, and lose the greater part of their chlorine. The method of analysis adopted was very simple : a given quantity of the salt was boiled in a solution of carbonate of potash; the solu- tion, after saturation with nitric acid, was treated with nitrate of silver; the residue gave the proportion of oxide of antimony. Another less simple method was also employed: a quantity of the oxichloride was heated by a spirit lamp in a bent tube, one end of which was blown into a bulb. The greater part of the chlorine was condensed in the cold part of the tube, which was separated from the bulb; the chloride was dissolved in muriatic acid, and the antimony was preci- pitated by tin. What remained in the bulb was dissolved by tartaric acid, and afterwards treated with nitrate of silver. The metallic an- timony on one hand, and the chloride of silver on the other, gave the quantity of protochloride contained in the oxichloride analysed ; these agreed perfectly with that obtained by carbonate of potash. The analysis by carbonate of potash gave Protochloride .... 24°72 .... 25°30..:... 25°19 Protoxide ....;. TREE snc (ALU ns AAS Two analyses by fusion gave, Protochloride .... 25°50 ARP ibe isle, 586 Intelligence and Miscellaneous Articles. The mean of three analyses by carbonate of potash gave, Calculated. Protoxide of antimony .. 74°51 74:54 Protochloride of antimony 25°70 25°46 100°21 100-00 After having prepared sulphuretted hydrogen by muriatic acid slightly diluted with water and sulphuret of antimony, it will be ob- served that the solution remaining with the undissolved sulphuret becomes red on cooling. If it be added to a great quantity of water, an abundant yellowish precipitate is obtained, which, after some days, becomes a thin stratum of small crystals of a fine red colour. These crystals are merely the oxichloride coloured with variable quantities of sulphuret of antimeny.—Ann. de Ch. et de Ph., lix, 220. ON POTATOE STARCH. BY M. GUERIN-VARY. The author divides his memoir into two parts. In the first he ex- amines what substances accompany potatoe starch prepared with di- stilled water, and considers several problems, including those proposed by the commission of the Academy for examining the memoirs on starch fecula, The second part contains the proximate analysis of starch, as well as ultimate analysis of this substance, of amidine, of exterior amidin (de l’amidin tégumentaire), of soluble amidin, and of the exteriors (tégumens) insoluble in water and deprived of the pro- perty of becoming blue with iodine. In a former memoir M. Guérin has stated that potatoe starch, when prepared with distilled water, contains, as foreign organic bodies, only chlorophylle, and asubstance of a waxy appearance. M.Payen, on the contrary, recognises in starch, besides other inorganic substances, a volatile oil ready formed; and he also states that every specimen of potatoe starch that he has examined possessed the property of re- storing reddened litmus paper to its original colour, and contained carbonate of lime. M. Guérin in this memoir shows that the alkaline property of starch noticed by M. Payen is owing to the water which is used for washing it; and that volatile oil does not exist ready formed in the exteriors of starch, MM. Dubrunfaut and Beudant stating that it is formed during the alcoholic fermentation of starch. After noticing dextrine bread, M. Guérin gives the solutions of se- veral problems, and arrives at the following conclusions : Ist. Iodine has the same action on starch in water deprived of air, as it has when the air is not expelled. 2nd. Starch heated only with either pure or saline water, in a close vessel, gives a distilled liquor, which does not become blue on the addition of iodine. 3rd. When starch is treated with diastase and water, in a retort containing or not containing air, the distilled liquid does not turn blue with iodine. 4th. Pure fecula exposed to air by itself, or moistened with water for 48 hours at 113° or 115°, does not give rise to any carbonic nor acetic acid, and does not appear altered under the microscope. Thus the property of germinating, which is lost by the grains of certain de- Intelligence and Miscellaneous Articles. 587 scription of corn after remaining for some hours in a damp soil at the temperature of 113°Fahr., cannotbe attributed to any alteration which pure and damp fecula undergoes, as MM. Colin and Edwards consider. 5th. By treating starch with sulphuric acid, according to the pro- cess of M. de Saussure, no crystallizable compound could be obtained. Having treated potatoe starch with alcoho! and water, to extract the chlorophylle and the matter of a waxy appearance which it con- tains, the author proceeded to its proximate analysis. By rubbing this substance with water at 32° Fahr. until nothing more could be ex- tracted from it, and evaporating the liquors in vacuo it left a residue containing ADMIRE 5... 3:26 4.42 61°71 Amidin (soluble) .. 38:29—100- The part exhausted by water at 32° having been treated with boil- ing water, gave a liquor which by evaporation to dryness in vacuo, afforded Amidine (0.5.04. 5.04 60°31 Amidin (soluble) .. 39°69—100° The part insoluble in boiling water amounted to 2°12 per cent. of the starch employed. From these experiments it appears that water acts equally upon starch at afreezing or a boiling temperature. Now as there is no known substance which by the mere action of water at 32° is converted in several distinct products, except very dilute nitrate of bismuth and other analogous products, the author concludes that boiling water does not convert starch into amidine and soluble amidin, as might be thought by the modifications that heat and water cause in the constitution of many products of organization. The above results give the following composition : Exterior amidin.. 2°12 Soluble amidin .. 38°13 Amidine........ 59:75—100° Several ultimate analyses of starch, of exterior and soluble ami- dins, dried in vacuo at 275° Fahr., and the analysis of amidine dried in vacuo at 239° Fahr., allow him to give the composition of these substances as follows: Starch = C!7 H'!° O'°; amidine C!° H® O¢ ; exterior amidin = so- luble amidin C7 H® O+, or C'7 H1o Oto = Co H> O54C7 H> O+, Starch = amidine + amidins. These atomic formularies show that starch is equal to carbon and water ; amidine to carbon, water, and oxygen ; and amidin to carbon, water, and hydrogen. M. Guérin states that diastase converts exte- rior and soluble amidin, when hydrated, into a substance like sugar, and a substance insoluble in water, not rendered blue by iodine. When these amidins are dried, diastase does not act upon them; 100 parts of starch contain 1-705 parts of insoluble matter, which does not become blue with iodine, and which gives by analysis, Ist Analysis. 2nd Analysis. Carbon .... 47°71 47°68 Hydrogen.. 7:09 711 Oxygne .. 45°20—100° 45°21—100- These analyses compared with those of exterior amidin show the difference that exists between these substances; and the author is inclined to consider exterior amidin as an immediate principle, and 588 Intelligence and Miscellaneous Articles. not as a mixture of exteriors, not becoming blue with iodine and amidine.—L Institut, 1"* Fev. 1336. ARTIFICIAL CAMPHOR OR CAMPHOGENE. M. Opperman obtains artificial camphor by passing a current of dry hydrochloric acid gas into oil of turpentine. The absorption of the gas is very rapid, particularly if the vessel containing the oil of turpentine is surrounded by ice. Two distinct substances are formed: the one solid, the other li- quid. The solid substance, which is commonly called artificial camphor, is composed of, Carbone. ..4.. 0. 2c cence 70015 Biydrogen §0,6/5. 5. ile eto". 9°717 Chiorinewee. = 22 coe 20°272—100°004 This substance, when purified by sublimation, crystallizes in large and lengthened crystals, its taste is aromatic but weak, it burns with a very brilliant light, and colours the flame green, is soluble in alcohol like common camphor; its solution does not form any precipitate with nitrate of silver; the alkalies, lime, &c. decompose it by combining with its hydrochloric acid. To obtain thebase of this salt the camphor was distilled with hydrate of lime: a clear and transparent oil was also obtained of a particular but weak odour, and an aromatic taste, which became solid at — 44° Fahr.: its compo- sition, ascertained by means of the apparatus of M. Liebig, is, CarGOne, : ges Geran feitats ou 0 88-48 PA yd rope roe tas die es ahh 11-52—100: This substance, which had been called by M. Dumas camphogene, and by MM. Blanchet and Sell dadyle, is not acted upon either by nitric or aceticacid ; but hydrochloric acidimmediately reproduces artificial camphor.—L’ Institut, No. 149. NEW ACID OF BROMINE. M. Eugene Peligot is engaged in determining the action of chlo- rine, bromine, and iodine on salts formed by the organic acids with some of the metallic oxides, and has already arrived at results inter- esting both from their novelty and from the generalization they appear to present. When dry benzoate of silver is acted on by bromine it is decomposed, and bromine is absorbed in large quan~ tity. There is produced, bromine of silver, and a new acid which re- sembles benzoic acid in some of its physical properties, but differs ex- tremely in its composition. It contains, besides the elements of ben- zoic acid, all the oxygen of the oxide of silver and an atom of bromine. It may be obtained anhydrous by treating the products of the action by dry sulphuric ether, which dissolves the acid, and leaves the bro- mide of silver. At ordinary temperatures this acid is solid, but melts a little below the boiling point of water; slightly soluble in cold, but extremely so in boiling water, which upon cooling deposits the greater part of it : it burns with a flame edged with green, indicating the presence of bromine, which could not be recognised by a solution of nitrate of silyer, this not precipitating with it ; it forms crystallizable salts with Intelligence and Miscellaneous Articles. 589. oxides, in which the oxygen of the acid to the oxygen of the base is as 4 to I. M. Peligot has endeavoured, without success, to form an analogous acid by means of chlorine; the action is very violent, and inflamma- tion and complete destruction of the salt ensues. This happens with bromine if placed in contact with the salt in a fluid state ; it must be acted on by passing the vapour of bromine slowly into it, which will be absorbed. The action of iodine differs from that of bromine, for it forms both iodide and iodate of silver; but the acid has not yet been sufficiently examined to determine its nature. The action of bromine on benzoate of silver is moreover not a par- ticular action caused by the nature of benzoic acid, for it acts in a similar manner on salts formed by acids which appear to be less dis- posed to superoxygenation, as the oxalic and acetic acids, and every- thing tends to the belief that the mode of action of this body will be- come general.— L’ Institut, 15 Fev. 1836. OBSERVATIONS ON THE SOLAR ECLIPSE OF MAY 15, 1836. Photometrical Observations during the Eclipse, by Thos. Galloway, Esq. To R. Taylor, Esq. Dear Sir, The following observations, made during the solar eclipse on the 15th instant with two of Leslie’s photometers, may be interesting to some of yourreaders. The observations were made at Mr. Bishop’s observatory in the Regent’s Park, and the photometers were placed on a table on the lawn, fully exposed to the sun’s influence. With the exception of a few passing clouds the sky remained clear till to- wards the end of the eclipse, when the atmosphere became hazy. Mean Time.| Phot. A. | Phot. B. || Mean Time. | Phot. A. | Phot, B. h 1 2 Yours truly, Sergeant’s Inn, May 24, 1836, Tuos. GALLowAY, 590 Intelligence and Miscellaneous Articles. Extract of a Letter from R. V. Yates, Esq.. of Toateth Park, Liverpool, dated Edinburgh, May 15, 1836. «‘ We have just enjoyed a most glorious sight, an annular eclipse. The morning arose cloudy, and gave little promise ; but about 10 the clouds cleared off, and during the whole period of the eclipse nothing interfered with our seeing it perfectly. It was curious to watch it when it was just going to become annular, the light broke in so rapidly. It remained annular only a very short time, perhaps between 5 and 10 minutes.” Pp, M. Pp. M. . oh 1 5= Mh Much gh 46™ $i" obscurity. Annular, Air consi- a sy derably 2" 58 4 offuscated. In a garden near Birmingham the Gentians partially closed their flowers during the eclipse, and then opened again, The Rev. James Yates, by whom the above was communicated to us, has obligingly directed our attention to the description of an Annular Eclipse in the Norwegian Account of Haco’s Expedition against Scotland, which we transcribe from p. 44 of that work. pa er Hacon konongr 1a i Régnvalzyagi dré myrkr mikit 4 sdlina, sva at litill hringr var biartur um sdlina utan*, ok hellt pri nockora stund dags. While King Haco lay in Ronaldsvo a great darkness drew over the sun, so that only a little ring was bright round about the sun, and it continued so for some time. * Though relating to inquiries of a different class, I am tempted to note the Islandic expression ‘‘wm solina utan,’’ as a remarkable illustration of the real origin of our compound preposition Azour, ymbucan,—the noun being here in- terposed between the two prepositions. See my Note on the complicated mistakes in which the history of this word had been involved by Spelman, Skinner, and Tooke, subjoined to the 8yo. edition of the Diversions of Purley, 1829, vol. i. p. viiii—R, Taycor. Intelligence and Miscellaneous Articles. 591 HYDRAULIC LIME, M. Vicat communicated a paper to the Royal Academy of Sciences at Paris on the sole efficacy of magnesia in rendering certain lime- stones hydraulic. This paper has for its object the correction of an opinion given by M. Berthier in the Journal des Mines of 1822, that magnesia alone has no more efficacy than alumina to render lime hydraulic; from which it would follow that silex was the only essential principle in all cases. M. Vicat was for a long time of the same opinion, which he now declares is incorrect ; and says that magnesia alone, when in suffi- cient quantity, will render pure lime hydraulic. He does not ex- plain the degree of energy of these new species of lime, but only affirms that they will solidify from the 6th to the 8th day, and con- tinue to harden in the same manner as ordinary hydraulic lime. Until his experiments are further advanced, he states that the proportions of magnesia taken and weighed after calcination should be from 30 to 40 of every 40 of pure anhydrous lime. The native limestones examined and cited by M. Berthier contained only from 20 to 26 of magnesia for every 78 to 60 of lime : it is probable that this want of proper proportions was the cause of his negative re- sults. M. Vicat, in conclusion, points out the importance of these observations,—hydraulic lime never having been found in the cal- careous formation below the lias is because the dolomites have never been examined, but it is now probable it may be found in this lower formation.— L’ Institut, No. 153. NOTE RESPECTING CERTAIN CONTROVERSIAL COMMUNICATIONS LATELY SENT FOR INSERTION IN THIS JOURNAL. LIEUT. LECOUNT. We have received a letter from Licut. Lecount, claiming the in- sertion, in its entire form, of his previous letter in reply to Mr, P. Barlow, from which we gave an extract in our last N umber, p. 439. Lieut. Lecount makes this claim on the ground “that it is the ge- neral practice to allow any person who is attacked in a periodical publication the right of replying.” We have merely to observe, in answer, that our extract includes the real matter of Lieut. Lecount’s reply, and that we omitted only irrelevant matter of a personal na- ture, at the same time referring our readers to the pamphlet which he has published. We must therefore decline all further allusion to the subject. We may remark in reference to this, as well as to other cases of a similar kind which have lately occurred, that we cannot permit a scientific discussion to degenerate into a personal controversy, MR. HENWOOD. We take the present opportunity of noticing Mr, Henwood’s letter in the Records of General Science for May, to which the remark just 592 Intelligence and Miscellaneous Articles. made is also applicable. There was a very sufficient reason for our not inserting Mr. Henwood’s last reply to Mr. John Taylor on the subject of the steam-engines of Cornwall, namely, that the quotation itcontains from the Records of Mining is made in so garbled a manner as to be a complete misrepresentation of Mr. Taylor's statement. To prove this we give the passage entire as we find it in the Records of Mining, including in brackets what Mr. Henwood has suppressed, and by the suppression of which he has perverted the sense of the whole. «In the early part of the year (1813) the best duty was about 26 millions, by Captain Trevithick at Wheal Prosper, [Captain John Davey at Wheal Alfred, and Messrs Jeffree and Gribble at Stray Park. Towards the close of the year Captain Davey first attained 27 millions, then Jeffree and Gribble 28, and by the end of the year the latter had nearly arrived at 30 millions.)” One half of a sentence of the foregoing paragraph is thus brought forward in contradiction of Mr. Taylor's statement that Captain Trevithick’s “engine did only about 26 millions duty, and did not equal other engines then working in the common way.” A reference to the work itself showed us that if the remainder of the paragraph had been given, it would at once have been seen that the imputation was groundless. Can it reasonably be required of us to lend our pages to charges thus supported ? We will only add to this that the title « On anew Rotative Steam- » Engine,” was prefixed to Mr, Taylor’s first paper not by him, but by ourselves ; and the only sense in which we used the term “ new” was in that of “newly or lately erected.” Mr. Henwood must have been aware that Mr, Taylor had himself wholly precluded the sup- position that it could mean “newly invented,” by mentioning an older engine of the same description erected by Mr. Godfrey. METEOROLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS FOR APRIL 1836. Chiswick.—April 1. Dry haze: sleet: stormy with rain at night 2, 3. Cold and windy. 4. Clear and fine. 5. Slight haze: cloudy: rain. 6, Rain: cloudy. 7. Rain: clear. 8,9. Rain: cloudyand fine. 10. Fine. 11. Cold haze: clear at night. 12. Overcast: rain. 13. Cloudy. 14, Overcast and cold, 15. Slightrain. 16. Foggy. 17.Rain: cloudyand cold. 18. Drizzly: fine. 19.Fine. 20.Cloudy: rain, 21. Very fine. 22. Rain: fine. 23, Rain. 24. Rain: stormy at night. 27. Cloudy and cold. 28. Overcast. 29, 30. Clear, cold and dry. Boston.—April 1. Fine: rain and snow p.m. 2. Cloudy. 3. Stormy : rain and snow a.m. 4. Fine. 5. Cloudy. 6.Rain. 7. Rain. 8, Rain. 9. Cloudy. 10. Fine. 11. Cloudy. 12. Cloudy. 13. Cloudy: rain p.m. 14. Cloudy; rainp.m. 15. Cloudy. 16. Fine: raine.m. 17. Cloudy. 1s. Rain. 19. Fine: rainr.m. 20. Cloudy. 21. Fine. 292. Fine: rain early a.m. 23.Fine. 24. Cloudy: rainearlya.m. 25. Cloudy. 26. Fine. 27. Rain. 28. Cloudy. 29. Fine: ice this morning. 30, Stormy. “aye JO saargap Ur "AV 6 "005 “Ao :"puor'y *qurod-moq 88P-% 09-1 | 86-6 ung Ad 10- von “x “Nl “MSM see eee LZ0. N "MN “IBA ‘MN sos ee Q€0. juyeo) “MN *“MNN Lo. Lo- ose all ANG |S SON ‘MN wee to see “MN "“M N “M mas sey CLE. jwyeo) “aN “MN Co. cc. TOT. jwyeo) “as “a Oh Cl V60. "A | SAAS "MAS 80- 60: 190. “Mm “MM “MS eee Lo £90. "AL "MS “MS 90. g0- zo “Mm | “MS | “IBA “AS Po- eee eee wea “MS ‘Ss vis a 190. |uxjeo] “a ‘s Lo £0. LZ0- |uayeo] ‘N “a ‘a Ot- gfo- jwyeo| “a “a Il: 10: “ee Jue) “AN *"MNN Po- 10: ** lurpea} “AAS “M sae Shin se. eA ay male ees 10- ten iit PRANG one see see 610: wyeo) “™ N see see P6L- wyeo ‘aN N eT. Il: 9£0. |uyeo) “# “x ve. vo. cce. |uypes) °s ‘AVA “aS 60- oP: 190. “ms | “AAS "IBA °S Lo. IT- ILI. |uyeo| “ASS | sava sas see Lats see ulyeo "MS "AS ats wee 30 N "NU “MN ae Lo. L¥o. ‘N Nuva *MNA LZ. | Z0- 16S |sm | ‘# “MS £0. OL. eee et (SAN Nile 8 “AS *uojsog | ‘“MsIyg ane eins 4s0gq aa ae Moy + uopuoT i : uopuo'T ent "PULAL *u0j807 JD TIFAA “Lp Ag pun Suopuory avau ‘younsiyz yo Ayar0g pounzjnoyLopy yi fo uapiny 24) 1 NOSANONL “yy 49 { hunjasoag qunjsisspr ay; fig fiza.o0g johoy ayy fo squaupind py ayz yo appu stoyDA4289Q 109F0}0.L09) 97 8-SP €-15 | $.0F | 1-0F | 8°-6z LS8-62 €y | c& | 19 | F-6P | u-Z | €-sh | $t-6% | 994-62 | L08-6z | PLL-6z G.ge | Lo | SS | Lop | $.SE | P-6€ | 1P-6% | Phg-62 | 926-62 | £06-4z cy | Pe | 9S | €-2S | S-LE | £.OF | BP-6Z | 698-62 | 896-62 | 8£6.6z ey | c¢ | 19 | LEP | age | 9-PF | 1€-6% | 908-62 | 266-62 | 08-62 0S | o£ | SS | G-€S | P-PP | 9-09 | 19-66 | L08-6z | FET-O£ | I11-0€ ov | gf | LG | LFS | L-6€ | 8-SP | S9-62 | E€1-0€ | PHI-O€ | LIT-0€ gr | Sf | 29 | 6LP | €-SP | 6.0P | Sz-6z | LOL-62 | £L6.6% | 669-62 G.2G | Ph | SS | O-PS | PLP | 9-1¢ | 1€-6% | £78-6z | 806.62 | 068-62 GG | av | €9 | €-19 | LV | 9-€9 | ZZ-6% | 908-62 | 146.6% | F18-62 oS | oF | 8S | £99 | €-€P | S-6h | OF-6z | 216.6% | PP6.6% | 9£6.6z €¢ |} 17 | LG | zSS | S.gf | €-€¢ | oF-6z | 668-62 | OF0.0£ | Fg6.6z 1S | ZV | LS | 3-99 | €-PP | B19 | 89-62 | $60-0€ | ZPI.0€ | LI1-0€ Lv | S€ | 6S | LVS | O-ZP | BP | 09-62 | 6IT-0€ | CE1-0£ | $60.0€ LV | 9€ | 19 | 8-LV | €-a0 | 9-9P | 99-62 | ZOI-0€ | OVI-O£ | S11-0€ LV | oF | 8S | 9.29 | 8-8€ | PEP | 79-62 | TOT-O€ | 002-08 | zoT-0£ G-LV | of | 9S | 3-PS | S-LPV | €-0¢ | $9.62 | OST-0€ | 80z%.0€ | ZS1.0€ Lv | LV | 8S | GUS | 62P | Z-8P | SP-6z | $00-0€ | 680.08 | 266.62 €¢ | sé | LG | V-0S | u-SP | V-1S | 12-62 | PEL-6z | 9F8.4% | 918.62 cy | th | €S | LS | GS-8 | BBP | 0£-6z | 962-62 | 878-62 | SLL.6z G.ePr | 62 | €S | 9-8? | g-oP | LEV | o€-6e | LEL-6% | SOL.62 | Lol.6z LV | 2b | 9S | Z-€S | 3-0P | PSP | 02-62 | 609-6% | EPL-62% | 0SS.6% GP | 6€ | gv | L-0F | Z-0F | P-2P | €0-6z | PEE-6z | PEP.6z | £gz.6a oF | 6€ | €S | $-6P | €-8& | V-OF | O2-gz | PE0-6% | 192-62 | 900-64 ev | GE | Sc | £09 | €-oF | 9-EF | 26-9z | PEL-6% | 18P-6% | gho-6z G.PP | 6€ | OF | uRP | 8-OF | ZHP | OF-6z | 624-62 | 16-62 | £68.62 ey | oF | FS | aoS | L-PE | £-3h | LL-6z | 191-08 | SPZ-0F | 6L1-0F 6€ | La | 1S | 9-9F | £-ZE | L-6€ | £6.92 | FOL-O€ | SIP-0€ | 90£.0€ ov | O€ | SV | 0.SP | 8-€€ | 9-1P | 09.62 | £00.08 | SEE-OF | $16-6z Sf | PE | oF | C-PP | LCE | €-6€ | S0.6z | 9zG-6% | €€8-6% | 115.6% av | €€ | oF | LPP | 6-98 | V-EV | SE-6z% | 19€-6z | 978-62 | 264-62 “ul “xe “xe “ul SD \ ie “ul “xe a Wy te | stuttonsisortos aS WV $8 at K eoxoy uoJsOg) “YIIMSTIYD "00g “hoy :uopuoy “uojsog “MOUMSTYyD : uOpuo’f “ADJOULOULLIY, J, *ADJIOWIOIVST Aas PSSrAA um Widy “98ST "Huo yy jo sktqi »)) 3M June 1836. Third Series. Vol. § No, 50. Supplement. INDEX to VOL. VIII. —>—_ A xsorpTION, on, 58. Achromatic microscope, 70. Acids :—hydriodic, 191; hydrochloric, 353; suberic, 443; carbonic, 446, 583; arsenovinic, 447; new acid of bromine, 588. /Ether, on the formation of, 258. Agassiz (Prof.) on the fossil beaks of four species of Chimera, 6; on the fossil fishes found in English collec- tions, 72; the Wollaston Medal award- ed to, 310. Air, influence of its artificial rarefaction and condensation in some diseases, 62: action of mushrooms on, 82. Aldehyd, a new compound, 83. Algebraic equations, 402; elimination, 538. Alison (R. E.) on the earthquake of Chili, Feb. 20, 1835, 74. Ammonia, its action on the chlorides and oxides of mercury, 495. Animals, thermometer for determining minute differences of temperature in, 57. Antimony, on a supposed new sulphate and oxide of, 476; crystallized oxi- chloride of, 585. Apjohn’s (Dr.) formula for inferring the specific heats of gases, error in, 21. Araneide, undescribed species of, 481. Arches, skew, construction of, 299. Architecture, on the entablature of Gre- cian buildings, 430; Gothic, 449. Arsenic, vaporization of, 190. Arsenovinic acid, 447. Astronomy :— improved astronomical clock, 71; Newton and Flamstead, 139, 211, 218, 225; the aurora bo- realis of Noy. 18, 184, 236, 350, 412, 439; Halley’s comet, 148, 173; Dr. Brinkley, 155; Mr. Troughton, 155 ; new observatory at Catania, 256; so- lar eclipse of May 15, 293, 589, 590; new method of reducing lunar obser- vations, 373. Atkinson (J.) on Sir G.S. Mackenzie’s remarks on certain points in meteoro- logy, 187. Atmosphere, action of mushrooms on the, 82; action of plants upon, 415. Aurora borealis of Nov. 18, 154, 236, 350, 412, 439. Babington (C. C.) on new British and European plants, 345. Babylon and Babel, non-identity of, 506. Barlow (P.) on the theory of gradients in railways, 97 ;.on Lecount’s trea- tise on iron rails, 291. Barlow (W. H.), experiments on Drum- mond’s light, 238. ; Barometer, self-registering, 67. Barytes and strontia, separation of, 259. Bat, long-eared, habits of, 265. Bayfield (Capt.) on the transportation of rocks by ice, 558. Beck (Dr.) on the geology of Denmark, 553. Beke (C. T.) on the Persian Gulf, and on the non-identity of Babylon and Babel, 506. Berzelius (M.) on the properties of tel- lurium, 84; symbolic notation first introduced by, 101; on Faraday’s sup- posed sulphate and oxide of antimony, 476. Binney (E. W.) on a patch of red and variegated marls, 571. Blackwall (J.), characters of some un- described species of Araneide, 481. Botanical Society of Edinburgh, 440. Botany :—Indian Gentianee, 75; two species of the genus Pinus, 255; on the Nephrodium rigidum, 255; va- rieties of Erica ciliaris and Tetralia, 256; on several new British and European plants, 345; on a species of Agave, 346; Cooper’s Botanical Rambles, 411; action of light upon plants, and of: plants upon the atmo- sphere, 415; on the ovula of Santa- lum album, 423; W. Sherard and Dillenius, 424; Botanical Society of Edinburgh, 440; on the green colour of plants, 469; on germination, 491. Brayley (E. W. jun.), note on Mr. Chal- lis’s paper on capillary attraction, 172 Breithaupt’s Mineralogy, 173. Brewster (Sir D.) on the crystalline lenses of animals, 195, 416; on the lines of the solar spectrum, and on those produced by the earth’s atmo- sphere, and by the action of nitrous acid gas, 384; on the colours of natu- ral bodies, 468; on the optical pro- NDEX, perty of a substance resembling shell, 548. Bridges, skew, construction of, 299. Brinkley (Dr.), notice of, 155. British Association, official report of the Dublin Meeting, 58. Broderip (W. J.) on the habits of the Chimpanzee of the Zoological Gar- dens, 164. Bromine, on its conducting power for electricity, 130, 400; new acid of, 588. Brooke (H. J.) on symbolic notation, 101; on thulite and strémite, 169. Buckland (Rev. Dr.) on the fossil beaks of four extinct species of Chimera, 4. C. S. on Whiston, Halley, and the Quar- terly Reviewer of the ‘ Account of Flamsteed’, 225. Calamary, on the eye of the, 1. Calculus, new renal, 446. Caldcleugh (A.) on the earthquake in Chili, Feb. 20, 1835, 148; account of the volcanic eruption of Coseguina, 414. Calorific rays, on, 23, 109, 186, 190, 248. Cambridge Philosophical Society, 78, 429. Camden Literary and Philosophical In- stitution, 431. Camphor, artificial, 588. Capillary attraction, 89, 172, 288. Carbohydrogen, nitrate of, 85. Carbonic acid, solidification of, 446; liquid, 583. Cast-iron beams, Mr. Hodgkinson on, 65. Catania, new observatory at, 256. Cauchy's (M.) theory of double refrac- tion, 104; undulatory theory of light, 7, 24, 112, 204, 247; 271, 305, 413; new formuia for solving the problem of interpolation, 459. Cautley (Capt.) on the remains of mam- malia found in the Sewalik moun- tains, 575. Challis (Rev. J.) on capillary attraction and the molecular forces of fluids, 89; on the phenomena of drops of oil floating on water, 288. Charlesworth (Edw.) on the crag-for- mation, 529. Chemical preparations, English, on the frequent presence of lead in, 267. Cheverton (Mr.) on mechanical sculp- ture, 70. Chili, earthquake of, Feb. 20, 1835, 74, 148. Chimera, on the fossil beaks of four species of, 4. Chimpanzee, habits of the, 161. 995 Chloride of soda, its use in fever, 64. Chlorine, on its conducting power for electricity, 130, 400. Christie (C. C.) on the aurora borealis of Nov. 18, 1835, 412. Chromium, crystallized oxide of, 175; iodide of, 192. Cod, crystalline lens of the, 193. Cold, its effects on the body, 59. Collision and impact, on, 65. Colours of natural bodies, 468. Comet, Halley’s, 148, 173. Compass, steering, 71. Cooper (E. J.) on Halley’s Comet, 148. Cooper’s (D.) Flora Metropolitana, 411. Cornwall, steam engines of, 20, 67, 136. Crag formation, on the, 38, 138, 529. Crichton (Sir A.), account of some fos- sil remains, 574. Crystallized surfaces, reflexion from, 103. Culebrite, 261. Cuming (H.) on the earthquake at Val- paraiso, Noy. 1822, 159. Cunningham (P.) on the attractions of positive and negative electric cur- rents, 550. Cyanogen, compound of, 191. Daniell (Prof.) on voltaic combinations, 421. Darwin (F.), geological notes made dur- ing a survey of the East and West coasts of South America, 156. Daubeny (Dr.) on Sir H. Davy’s theory of volcanos, in reply to Dr. Davy, 249; on the action of light upon plants, and of plants upon the atmosphere, 415. Davies (T. S.), geometrical investiga- tions concerning terrestrial magne- tism, 418. Davy’s (Sir H.) electro-chemical theory, subsidiary hypothesis to, 170. Davy (Dr. J.), Dr. Daubeny’s reply to, 249; Prof. Faraday’s reply to, 521. DeCandolle (M.) on the conditions of germination, reply to, 491. Del Rio (A.) on Riolite and Herrerite, 261. Denham (Capt.) on vibration of rail- ways, 70. Denmark, geology of, 553. Deshayes (M.), the Wollaston Donation Fund awarded to, 311. Dillenius (Prof.), short notice of, 424. Don (Frof.), descriptions of Indian Gen- liane@, 75; on two species of the genus Pinus, 255; onthe Nephrodium rigidum, 255; on varieties of Erica ciliaris and Tetralia, 256. Drummond’s light, on, 238. 3 M2 - 596 E., W. B. Note on Mr. Challis’s paper _. on capillary attraction, 172. Earthquake of Chili, 74, 148. Earthquake waves, their effects on the coasts of the Pacific, 181. Eclipse, solar, 293, 589, 590. Edmonds (R.) on the mirage, 169. Education, scientific and general, 432. Egerton (Sir P. G.), catalogue of fossil fish, 367. Elastic bodies, on the collision of, 65. Electricity, 114, 130, 400, 421, 455, 550. Electro-chemical theory of Sir H. Davy, subsidiary hypothesis to, 170. Electro-magnetic rotation, 521. Entomology :—on the compound eyes of insects, 202; on the yellow fly, 347; Samouelle’sUseful Compendium, 412; undescribed species of Araneid@, 481. Equations, congeneric surd, 43; alge- braic, 402; of the fifth degree, 538. Equinoctial gales, on the, 187. Eye:—of the Sepia Loligo, 1; crystal- line lens, 193, 195, 416; on the com- pound eyes of insects, 202. F. W. Optical experiment, 168. Faraday (Prof.), researches in electri- city, 114; Royal Medal awarded to, 150; on the magnetic relations and characters of the metals, 179; ona supposed new sulphate and oxide of antimony, 476; on the condensation of the gases, in reply to Dr. Davy, 521. Fever, use of chloride of soda in, 64. Fishes, on the fossil beaks of four ex- tinct species of, 4; fossil, 72, 366. Flamsteed and Newton, 139, 211, 218, 225. Fluids, molecular forces of, 89. Forbes (Prof.) on the undulatory theory of heat, 246; the Keith prize awarded to, 424; on the mathematical form of the Gothic pendent, 449; on the tem- peratures of certain hot springs, and on the verification of thermometers, 551. Fossils:—beaks of the Chimera, 4; fishes, 72; catalogue of fossil fish, 366; vertebre of fish, 557; vegetable remains, 574. Fox (C.) on the construction of skew arches, 299. Fox (R. W.) on the magnetic forces, 108. Fractions, vanishing, 295, 398, 515. Fresnel’'s law of double refraction, 104, 248. Galloway (T.) on the solar eclipse, May 15, 589. INDEX. Gases, specific heats of, 21; condensa- tion of, 521. Gentianeea, descriptions of Indian, 75. Geological Society, 71, 156, 310. Geology :—on the fossil beaks of four species of Chimera, 4; geology of West Norfolk, 28; discovery of fossil fishes in the new red sandstone, 72; on the gradual sinking of the west coast of Greenland, 73; earthquake of Chili, 74; on the crag formation, 38, 138, 529; notes made during a survey of the east and west coasts of S. America, 156; effects produced at Valparaiso by the earthquake of Nov. 1822, 159; effects of earthquake waves on the coasts of the Pacific, 181; on physical geology, 227, 272, 357; anniversary proceedings of the Geological Society, 310; catalogue of fossil fish, 366; geological rela- tions of certain hot springs, 551; geology of Denmark, 553; occur- rence of fossil vertebrz of fish in the loess of the Rhine, 557; selenite in the sands of the plastic clay, 558; transportation of rocks by ice, 558; syenite veins which traverse the mica slate of Antrim, 559; geological structure of Pembrokeshire, 561; origin of the terms Silurian and Cambrian systems, 561; on the gravel and alluvia of S. Wales and Siluria, 566; ona patch of red and variegated marls, 571; on the streams of sea water in the island of Cephalonia, 573; on the caves of Ballybunian, 547; fossil vegetable remains, 574; remains of mammalia found in the Sewalik mountains, 575; fossil re- mains of Saurian animals, 577; on the ossiferous cavern of Yealm Bridge, 579. German silver, analysis of, 80. Germination, conditions of, 491. Gibraltar Scientific Society, 256. Gothic pendent, on the, 449. Gradients on railways, 51, 97, 243. Grant (T. T.) on protecting iron from the action of salt water, 128. Graves (Dr.) on the use of chloride of soda in fever, 64. Graves (J. T.) on the logarithms of unity, 281. Grecian buildings, on the entablature of, 430. Greenland, on the gradual sinking of part of the west coast of, 73. Griffith (R.) on the syenite veins which INDEX. traverse the mica slate of Antrim, 559. Guérin (M.) on potatoe starch, 586. Hall (Dr. M.), description of a thermo- meter for determining minute differ- ences of temperature, 57. Halley, remarks on, 144, 214, 220, 225. Halley’s comet, 148, 1738. Hamilton (Sir W. R.), Royal Medal awarded by the Royal Society to, 150; theorem respecting algebraic elimina- tion, 538. Handyside (Dr.) on the offices of lac- teals, lymphatics, and veins in the function of absorption, 58. Hare’s (Dr.) voltaic trough, 116, 119. Harris (W.S.) on the attractive and re- pulsive forces of magnets, 349. Heat :—radiant, 23, 109, 186, 190, 246,425; undulatory theory of, 246 ; its circular polarization by total re- flexion, 246; repulsive/power of, 189. Heineken (N. S.) on the aurora bo- realis of Nov. 18, 1835, 439. Henwood (W. J.) on the steam engines of Cornwall, 20, 591. Herrerite, 261. Herschel (Sir J. F. W.), meteorological __ observations, 78; on scientific and ge- neral education, 432. Hodgkinson (E.) on impact and colli- sion, 65. Hope (Dr.), address on presenting the Keith prize to Prof. Forbes, 424. Hopkins (W.) on physical geology, 227, 272, 357. Horner (L.) on a substance resembling shell, 545. Horner (W. G.) on congeneric surd equations, 43. Hudson (Dr.) on an error in Dr. Ap- john’s formula for inferring the spe- cific heats of dry gases, 21; on the transmission of calorific rays, 109. Hydriodic acid, a test for the vegetable alkalies, 191. Hydrochloric acid, its action on certain sulphates, 353. Hydrometer, Prof. Stevelly’s, 69. Impact and collision, on, 65. Inglis (Dr.) on iodine, 12, 191. Insects, compound eyes of, 202. Integral calculus, 515, 549. Interpolation, M. Cauchy on, 459. lodine:—essay on, 12,191; its conduct- ing power for electricity, 130, 400. Tron, on protecting it from the action of salt-water, 128. Jones (‘I’. W.) on the retina and pigment of the eye of the Sepia Loligo, 1. 597 Johnson (KE. J.), magnetic experiments on an iron steam-vessel, 547. Kane (Dr.) on the action of hydro- chloric acid on certain sulphates, 353 ; on the action of ammonia on the chlorides and oxides of mercury, 495. Kater (Capt.), list of the papers contri- buted by him to the Philosophical Transactions, 151. Keith (Rev. P.) on the conditions of germination, 491. Kelland (Mr.) on the dispersion of light, 429. Kennedy (Dr.) on purulent ophthalmia, 65 5. Laplace’s (M.) capillary theory, on, 89; coefficients, 474. Lardner (Dr.) on the theory of gradients in railways, 51. Lead, cause of its presence in English chemical preparations, 267. Lecount (Lieut.), reply to Mr. Barlow, 439, 591. Leigh (J.) on a patch of red and varie- gated marls, 571. Lens, crystalline, of animals, 193, 416. Liebeg (M.) on aldehyd discovered by, 83. Light :—apparatus for illustrating the polarization of, 70; its action upon plants, 415; undulatory theory of, 7, 24, 113, 204, 247, 270, 305, 413, 429, 500. Lighthouses, experiments on Drum- mond’s light for, 238. Lime, hydraulic, 591. Linnean Society, 75, 255, 345, 423, 580. Liverpool tides, on the, 147, 418, 547. Logarithms of unity, on, 281. Lubbock (J. W.) on tide observations made at Liverpool, 418. Lunar observations, on reducing, 373. Lyell (C.), address at anniversary of the Geological Society, Feb. 19, 1836, 310; on the occurrence of fossil ver- tebre of fish in the loess of the Rhine, 557. MacCullagh (J.) on the laws of re- flexion from crystallized surfaces, 103. M‘Donnell (Dr.) on the differential pulse, 63. Magnetic action, 55, 108, 180, 242, 349. experiments tried on board an iron steam-vessel, 547. forces, on the, 55, 108, 242, 349, relations of the metals, 179. Magnetism, researches in, 455; ter- restrial, 418. 598 Magnets, attractive and repulsive forces of, 349. Manganese, sesquisulphate of, 173. Marcet (M.) on the action of mush- rooms on atmospheric air, 82. Mathematics, 43, 281, 295, 393, 402, 515, 538, 549. Melloni’s (M.) theory of the transmis- sion of calorific rays, on, 23, 109, 186, 190, 246. Mercury, action of ammonia on the chlorides and oxides of, 495. Metals, magnetic relations of the, 179. Meteorology, 67, 78, 187, 256, 263, 351, 447, 592; table for Nov. 88; for Dec. 176; for Jan. 264; for Feb. 352 ; for Mar. 448; for Apr. 5938. Microscope, achromatic, 70. Miller (Prof.) on the measurement of the axes of optical elasticity of certain crystals, 431. Mineral veins, 229. Mineralogy, on symbolic notation as applied to, 101; Breithaupt’s Mine- ralogy, 173; on thulite and stromite, 169; culebrite, 261; Riolite and Her- rerite, 261. Mirage, as seen in Cornwall, 169. Mitscherlich (E.) on nitro-benzide and sulpho-benzide, 257; on the forma- tion of zther, 258. Mudge (Capt.) on the ossiferous cavern of Yealm Bridge, 579. Murchison (R. I.) on the discovery of fossil fishes in the new red sandstone of Tyrone, 72; on the geological structure of Pembrokeshire, 561; on the gravel and alluvia of South Wales and Siluria, 566. Murray (Sir J.) on the influence of ar- tificial rarefaction in some diseases, and the effects of its condensation in others, 62. Mushrooms, their action on atmospheric air, 82. Nephrodium rigidum, 255. Newton and Flamsteed, 139, 211, 218, 225. Newton’s Principia, inquiry relative to Dr. Pemberton’s translation of, 441 ; theory of natural colours, on, 468. Nickel, separation of zinc from, 80. Nitrate of carbohydrogen, 85. Nitro-benzide and sulpho-benzide, 257. Nitrogen, iodide of, 12, 13. Nixon (J.), table of observed terrestrial refractions, 479. Notation, symbolic, as applied to mine- ralogy, 101. INDEX. Oil, on the phznomena of drops of floating on water, 288. Ophthalmia, purulent, 65. Opium, new alkali in, 444. Optical experiment, 168 ; optical struc- ture of the crystalline lenses of ani- mals, 193. Organic remains, 30, 32, 561, 576, 579. Osborne (Dr.) on the effects of cold on the human body, and on a mode of measuring refrigeration, 59. Oxacids, action of on pyroxylic spirit, 85. Oxide of chromium, crystallized, 175. - Parish (W.) on the effects of the earth- quake waves on the coasts of the Pa-~ cific, 181. Pemberton’s (Dr.) translation of New- ton’s Principia, inquiry relative to, 441. Pembrokeshire, geology of, 561, 567. Persian Gulf, on the, 506. Phillips (R.) on the action of oxacids on pyroxylic spirit, 85. Phloridzine, 444. Pingel (Dr.) on the gradual sinking of the west coast of Greenland, 73. Pinus, descriptions of two species of, 255. Poisson’s (M.) capillary theory, on, 89. Polariscope, simple, 70. Potatoe starch, 586. Powell (Prof.), remarks on M. Melloni’s paper on the transmission of calorific rays, 23; on M. Cauchy’s theory of the dispersion of light, 24, 204, 305 ; on the theory of dispersion, 112; note on the transmission of radiant heat, 186; on the dispersion of light, 413. Pratt (J. H.) on the proposition that a function of @ and wz can be developed in only one series of Laplace’s coefti- cients, 474. Prawn, on the growth of the, 421. Precipitate, white, 498. Pritchard (A.), apparatus for illustrat- ing the polarization of light, 70. Psychometer, or measurer of refrigera- tion, 61. Pulse, on the differential, 63. Pyroxylic spirit, action of oxacids on, 85. Quinine, iodide of, 191. Radiant heat, 23, 109, 186,190, 246, 425. Railways, theory of gradients in, 51, 97, 243; on vibration of, 70; re- marks on iron rails, 291, 439. Rainbow, explanation of, on the doc- trine of interference, 78. Rain-gauge, self-registering, 69. Reflexion, 103, 246. INDEX. Refraction, 108, 479. Refrigeration, mode of measuring, 59. Resistance, on the solid of least, 66. Retina of the eye of the common ca- lamary, 1. Reviews :—Whewell’s Newton and Flamsteed, 139; Young’s Theory and Solution of Algebraic Equations, 402; Wiegmann’s Herpetologia Mexicana, 410; Cooper’s Flora Metropolitana, 411; Samouelle’s Entomologist’s Use- ful Compendium, 412; Webster's Principles of Hydrostatics,andTheory of the Equilibrium and Motion of Fluids, 544. Richardson (W.) on selenite in the sands of the plastic clay near Herne Bay, 558. Rigaud (Prof.) on a note in the Quar- terly Review respecting Mr. Whewell, 218; on Newton, Whiston, Halley, and Flamsteed, 220; on the aurora borealis of Nov. 18, 1885, 350; in- quiry relative to Dr. Pemberton’s translation of Newton’s Principia,441. Riley (Dr.) on various fossil remains of Saurian animals, 577. Riolite, 261. Ritchie (Dr.) on magnetic action, 55, 242; researches in electricity and magnetism, 455. Roberts (Mr.) on a machine which ren- ders objects visible while revolving 200,000 times in a minute, 71. Robinson (Dr.) on the aurora of Nov. 18, 1835, 236. Rose (C. B.) on the geology of West Norfolk, 28. Royal Institution, 348. Royal Society, 147, 412, 545. Royal Society of Edinburgh, 424. Rudberg’s (M.) undulatory theory of dispersion, 28, 113, 210. Rumker (C.), new method of reducing lunar observations, 373. Russell (J. S.) on the solid of least re- sistance, 66. Schweitzer (G.) on the cause of the presence of lead in English chemical preparations, 267. Sculpture, production of busts, &c. by machinery, 70. Sepia Loligo, on the eye of the, 1. Shell, on a substance resembling, 545. Sherard (W.), the founder of the Pro- fessorship of Botany at Oxford, 424. Ships, new form for the construction of, 66. Silver, German, analysis of, 80. Smith (J. D.), analysis of German sil- 599 ver, and the separation of zine from nickel, 80; on the separation of ba- rytes and strontia, 259; on the com- position of carbonate of zinc, 261. Snow, red, 80. Soda, chloride of, its use in fever, 64. Solar eclipse of May 15, 298, 589, 590. Solar spectrum, lines of the, 384. Solid of least resistance, on the, 66. Solly (E. jun.) on the conducting power of iodine, bromine, and chlorine for electricity, 130, 400. Sowerby (J. de C.) on the habits of the long-eared bat, 265. Specific heats of dry gases, error in Dr. Apjohn’s formula for inferring, 21. Squire (T.) on the solar eclipse of May 15, 298. Starch, potatoe, 586. Steam-engines :—improvements in, 71 ; of Cornwall, 20,136; rotatory, 20,136. Steam-vessel, iron, magnetic experi- ments on, 547. Stevelly (Prof.), description of a self- registering barometer, 67. Strigisan, a variety of wavellite, 173. Stromite and thulite, 169. Strontia and barytes, separation of, 259. Sturgeon (W.), description of the aurora borealis of Nov. 18, 134. Stutchbury (S.) on various fossil re- mains of Saurian animals, 577. Suberic acid, 443. Sulphate of copper, action of hydro- chloric acid on, 353. Sulpho-benzide and nitro-benzide, 257. Sulphur, vaporization of, 189. Sykes (Col.) on the caves of Ballybunian, 574. Symbolic notation, on, 101. Talbot (H. F.) on the repulsive power of heat, 189; on the integral calculus, 549. Taylor (J.) on the duty of steam- engines in Cornwall, 67; on rotatory steam-engines, 136. Tellurium, properties of, 84. Temperature, thermometer for deter- mining minute differences of, 57. Thebaia, a new alkali in opium, 444. Thermal springs, temperature of, 551. Thermometer :—for determining minute differences of temperature, 57 ; fallacy of determining climate by the, 61 ; for measuring refrigeration, 61 ; veri- fication of, 552. Thompson (J.V.) on the metamorphoses in the Macroura, 421. Thomson (Dr.) on sesquisulphate of manganese, 173. 600 Thulite and strémite, 169. Tides, at Liverpool, 147, 418, 547; re- marks on tides, 430. Tovey (J.) on the relation between the velocity and Jength of a wave of light, 7, 270, 500. Undulatory theory, 7, 24, 113, 204, 247, 270, 305, 413, 429, 500. Valparaiso, effects produced by the earthquake of Nov. 1822 at, 159. Volcanos, on the chemical theory of, 250; eruption of Coseguina, 414. Voltaic battery, improved, 114; prac- tical results of the, 121; voltaic com- binations, 421 ; Hare’s voltaic trough, 116, 119. Wagner (R.) on the compound eyes of insects, 202. Walford (E. B.), subsidiary hypothesis to the electro-chemical theory of Sir H. Davy, 170. Wavellite, 173. Webster’s Principles of Hydrostatics, and Zheory of the Equilibrium and Motion of Fluids, 544. Whewell, (tev. W.), notice of his pam- phlet “‘ Newton and Flamsteed,” 139; reply to the Quarterly Review, 211 ; INDEX. on the tides in the port of Liverpool . 4 147; some observations on the tides, 430; researches on the tides, 547. Whiston, remarks on, 214, 220, 225. Wiegmann’s Herpetologia Mewicana, 410. Willis (Rev. Mr.) on the composition of me entablature of Grecian buildings, 30. Wohler (F.) on crystallized oxide of chromium, 175. Woodward (S.) on the crag formation, 138. Woolhouse (W. S. B.) on the theory of gradients on railways, 243; on the theory of vanishing fractions, 393. Yarrell (W.) on a species of pipe-fish, 347; on an insect destructive to tur- nips, 347. Young (Prof.) on Mr. Woolhouse’s theory of vanishing fractions, 295, 515; theory and solution of algebraic equations, 402. : Zinc, its separation from nickel, 80; composition of carbonate of, 259; plates, amalgamation of, 585. Zoological Society, 161, 346. END OF THE EIGHTH VOLUME. Q /% / » = pin PRIN 1 YEOR,) SOURT, PLEBT STREET, RINTED BY men nnn ry Bai ajc j \S // Bt 4 Se as ; av a ary aes mya van IV Bee) AM oA