AMERICAN |
GROWING
De (-Xebu (ola
THR RURAL MANGA. 8
LP CAILEY* Barres
GoprightNo.
COPYRIGHT DEPOSI:
inane
ag ete.
\wh a ever .5 A
val aes
‘
"
ve.
ae
eee S
The Rural Manuals
Epitrep spy L. H. BAILEY
MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
The Rural Manuals
EpitEep sy L. H. BAILEY
*
MANUAL OF GARDENING — Bailey
Manuat oF Farm ANIMALS — Harper
FarM AND GARDEN Ru e-Book — Bailey
Manvat oF Fruit Insects — Slingerland and Crosby
ManuaL oF WrEDs — Georgia
THE Pruninec-ManuaL — Bailey
Manuva or Fruir Disrases — Hesler and Whetzel
Manuva oF Mitk Propucts — Stocking
MaANnvuAL OF VEGETABLE-GARDEN INnsEcCTs — Crosby
and Leonard
ManuaL oF TREE Diseases — Rankin
Manuva or Home-Maxine —Van Rensselaer, Rose,
and Canon
MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING — Hedrick
MANUAL OF
AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
BY
U. P. HEDRICK
HORTICULTURIST OF THE NEW YORK AGRICULTURAL
EXPERIMENT STATION
New Bork
THE MACMILLAN COMPANY
1919
All rights reserved
Coryriext, 1919,
By THE MACMILLAN COMPANY.
Set up and electrotyped. Published June, 1919.
JUL -7 1919
Norwood ress
J. 8. Cushing Co. — Berwick & Smith Co.
Norwood, Mass., U.S.A.
©OlaAs529112
PREFACE
SEVENTY-NINE books on grapes enrich the pomology of
North America, not counting numerous state and national
publications. Pomological writers in America have been
partial to the grape, for other fruits do not fare nearly so well.
Twenty-two books are devoted to the strawberry, fourteen to
the apple, to the peach nine, cranberry eight, plum five, pear
nine, quince two, loganberry one, while the cherry, raspberry,
and blackberry are not once separated from other fruits in
special books. Thus, though a comparative newcomer among
the fruits of the country, the grape has been singled out for a
treatise more times than all other fruits of temperate climates
combined — seventy-nine books on the grape, seventy on
all other fruits.
This statement of partiality does not lead to an apology for
a new book on the grape. There is urgent need for a new book.
But three of the seventy-nine treatises on this fruit are con-
temporary, and all but one, a handbook on training, are records
from vanished minds. Methods change so rapidly and varieties
multiply so fast, that to keep pace there must be new books on
fruits every few years. Besides, the types of grapes are so
diverse, and different soils, climates, and treatments produce
such widely dissimilar results, that many books are required to
do justice to this fruit — the vineyard should be seen through
many eyes.
Commercial grape-growing is now a great industry in America,
and deserves a treatise of its own. But there are also many
demands for information on grape-growing by those who grow
fruits for pleasure, especially by those who are escaping from
Vv
wf
vi PREFACE
cities to suburban homes, for the grape is a favorite fruit of
the amateur. And so, though Pleasure and Profit are a hard
team to drive together, this manual is written for both com-
mercial and amateur grape-growers.
In particular, the needs of the amateur are recognized in the
chapter on varieties, where many sorts are described which
have little or no commercial value. No other fruit offers the
enchantment of novelty to be found in the grape. Alluring
flavors, sizes, and colors abound, of which the amateur wants
samples. The commercial grower who plants but one variety
often finds himself dissatisfied with the humdrum of the
business. He should emulate the amateur and plant more
kinds, if only for pleasure; remembering the adage, “No
profit grows where is no pleasure ta’en.” Greater pleasure in
grape-growing, then, is offered as the justification of the long
chapter on varieties.
At the risk of too broad spreading, the author discusses, in
a book mainly devoted to native grapes, the culture of European
grapes in the far West. The chief aim is, of course, to set forth
information that will be helpful to growers of these grapes in
the western states, there being no treatises to which western
growers can refer, other than bulletins from state and national
agricultural institutions. There is, however, another reason
for attempting to cover the whole field of grape-growing in
America. It is certain that eastern grape-growers will some-
time grow European grapes. Western vineyards might well
be enlarged with plantings of native grapes. On the sup-
position, then, that the culture of both European and native
grapes is to become less and less restricted in America, the
author has ventured to discuss the culture of all grapes for all
parts of North America.
In the preparation of this manual, the author’s “The Grapes
of New York,” a book long out of print and never widely
distributed, has been laid under heavy contribution, especially
PREFACE vil
in the description of varieties. Acknowledgments are due to
F. Z. Hartzell for reading the chapter on Grape Pests and
their Control and for furnishing most of the photographs used
in making illustrations of insects and fungi; to F. E. Gladwin
for similar help in preparing the two chapters on pruning
and training the grape in eastern America; to Frederic T.
Bioletti for permission to republish from a bulletin written by
him from the Agricultural Experiment Station of California
almost the whole chapter on Grape Pruning on the Pacific
Slope; and to O. M. Taylor and to R. D. Anthony for very
material assistance in reading the manuscript and proofs.
U. P. Heprick.
GENEVA, N. Y.,
Jan. 1, 1919.
VI
Vil
Vil
IX
X
XI
XII
XII
XIV
XV
XVI
XVII
XVII
TABLE OF CONTENTS
THe DoMESTICATION OF THE GRAPE
GRAPE REGIONS AND THEIR DETERMINANTS
PROPAGATION
Stocks AND REsISTANT VINES .
THE VINEYARD AND ITS MANAGEMENT
FERTILIZERS FOR GRAPES .
PRUNING THE GRAPE IN EASTERN AMERICA
TRAINING THE GRAPE IN EASTERN AMERICA
GRAPE-PRUNING ON THE PaciFic Coast
EvurRoPpEAN GRAPES IN EASTERN AMERICA
GRAPES UNDER GLASS
GRAPE PESTS AND THEIR CONTROL
MARKETING GRAPES
GRAPE PRopUCTS
GRAPE BREEDING
MISCELLANIES
GRAPE Botany .
VARIETIES OF GRAPES
ix
108
123
150
184
192
204
230
250
273
284
300
330
4
4
~
;
a
%
:
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
PLATES
PLATE PAGE
I. Two views of vineyards in California; a vineyard in the
orchard region of central California, and a vineyard in
southern California. : R d ‘ : =, SLA
Il. Fitting the land for planting . 3 ‘ : ; . d4e
III. Cover-crop; cow-horn turnips, andrye . : ¥ - 486
IV. A well-tilled vineyard of Concords . : i 60
V. Vinifera grapes grown out of doors in New York; “Mal-
vasia and Chasselas Golden . , ‘ : , ee
VI. Black Hamburg : : ‘ P : : ; 2.1829
VII. Barry. Delaware . ! : : : ‘ : 1 G6)
VIII. Brighton . : . : , : : : : « 106%
IX. Campbell Early : : : : : é H Mage 1 ead
X. Clinton . ; : : : , ‘ s ; » 122"
XI. Concord . : ; : ; : : : : ; ‘lass
XII. Diana ‘ é 3 : i . : é : . 148+
XIII. Dutchess . ; : : ; : ‘ : : . 164
XIV. Eaton ‘ : - ; ? . s t : ~ ViBZ
XV. Eclipse. : ‘ : ‘ , : A : . 190°
XVI. Elvira. : ? : : : 3 5 ‘ 1 $202"
XVII. Empire State . : : : : : : : . BS
XVIII. Herbert . : é : : F E E ; » 228%
XIX. Iona ; : : 3 Y ; : : : . Base
XX. Isabella . 2 ; : : , . e : . ieee
XXI. Jefferson . : : : : : : : : » 2B2y
XXII. Lindley. Lucile. : : : : ; : . 298
XXIII. Lutie. Pocklington P : ; : ; z . 328%
XXIV. Moore Early . ; : ; : : . : . 340 ¥
xii LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
PLATE PAGE
XXV. Muscat Hamburg . A : s " : 5 . 350%
XXVI. Niagara . : : : a : : : : . 360°
XXVII. Salem : : : ‘ , ; . : : .. 340
XXVIII. Triumph . ‘ : ‘ ; ‘ : ; : . 380°
XXIX. Vergennes 5 : ; : : : ; : Ree | ues
XXX. Winchell . ; : ‘ ‘ P : 4 : . 400°
XXXI. Worden . : ‘ ; ; : : F : . 416v
XXXII. Wyoming , ‘ , ; : ; ‘ ‘ - 432%
FIGURES IN THE TEXT
FIGURE
1. A shoot of Vitis wnifera . , : : : : : f 3
2. A shoot of Vitis Labrusca . : : 2 , : A : 6
3. A shoot of Vitis rotundifolia : : , : E 2 = ae
4. A shoot of Vitis estivalis . ‘ : : ; ; ; , ale
5. A shoot of Vitis vulpina ; : : : ‘ : Mee
6. Planting cuttings : ; : 2 ; : : . ap
7. A cutting beginning nak, : : ; : : : . 40
8. Cutting off the trunk ; : : ‘ ; : : . 46
9. Cutting the cleft d ; ; : : : : c 4G
10. Inserting the cion : 3 ; : j . : : = Jan
11. The completed graft : : 47
12. Bench-grafted cuttings of grape, iowate tse cleft-graft ae
the whip-graft. (Adapted from Husmann) . : : F. SOlk
13. Vine ready for pruning ; ‘ ; : : : ‘ o 13
14. A “‘go-devil”’ for collecting prunings : é f « 29
15. A trellis and a common method of bracing end adats ; - 120
16. Chautauqua training; vine ready to prune ; ; : e157
17. Keuka method of training ‘ : ; : ; : . 130
18. Single-stem four-cane Kniffin training . : ' F gt dee
19. Umbrella method of training. ; : : f ; . 134
20. Two-trunk Kniffin training : 3 : potlioa
21. Rotundifolia vines trained by the ov ery method ‘ . 144
22. A Rotundifolia vine trained by the 6-arm renewal method . 145
23. Forms of head pruning : : : ; : = ; v~ 154
bo
RSS
. Forms of head pruning 2 : ‘ ; ‘ ; ; . 155
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS xiii
1URE PAGE
. Head pruning: fan-shaped head; fruit canes tied to horizontal
trellis. : ; ; : ; : . SLB6
. Single vertical cordon saith aisteeotice : ‘ F : * Se
. Unilateral horizontal cordon with fruit-spurs —. : ‘ » i158
. Three-year-old vine ready for pruning : : . . 169
. Vine of Fig. 28 after pruning for vase-formed aad : : . 169
. Three-year-old vines: A, pruned for a vase-formed, and B, for
a fan-shaped head 170
. Four-year-old vine pruned for eae niol feud 171
. Four-year-old vine pruned for high vase-formed head 172
. Fan-shaped vines: A, before pruning; B, after pruning 173
. Vertical cordon, young vine pruned 176
. Unilateral horizontal cordon with half-long pruning 77
)}. Leaf-galls of the phylloxera 05
F
. The grape root-worm
[2N bw Ww Fe
5
;. Root-worm beetle j 07
). Injuries caused by beetles of ite 28 endo 207
). Eggs of grape-vine flea-beetle : 209
|. First four stages of the grape leaf-hopper . : a 12
». The fifth and the mature stages of the grape ipabhappet : £2
;. A bunch of grapes despoiled by the grape-berry moth : . 214
1. Work of black-rot of the grape . : : : 3 : =. 219
». Grapes attacked by downy-mildew_ . ; ; 3 , . 221
}. Packing grapes on a packing-table_. : ; ‘ ; . 234
7. Climax baskets in two sizes ; 5 - : é ; . 236
3. William Robert Prince 3 - : : ; ‘ : i= Bt4
). E.S. Rogers é : ; ; ; : ‘ : P : 200
). T. V. Munson . : ; , : «AE
|. Staminate and perfect — aiiiataed onone vine. 285
2. Ringing grape-vines; a pes tools for ringing and oe
vines . : F > : - . 292
3. A grape flower; aceiig the opening cap and stamens. . 306
1. Grape flowers; showing upright and depressed stamens. . 3806
MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-
GROWING
CHAPTER I
THE DOMESTICATION OF THE GRAPE
Tue domestication of an animal or a plant is a milestone in
the advance of agriculture and so becomes of interest to every
human being. But, more particularly, the materials, the events
and the men who direct the work of domestication are of interest
to those who breed and care for animals and plants; the grape-
grower should find much profit in the story of the domestication
of thegrape. Whatwas the raw material of a fruit known since
the beginning of agriculture and wherever temperate fruits are
grown? How has this material been fashioned into use? Who
were the originative and who the directive agents? These are
fundamental questions in the improvement of the grape, answers
to which will also throw much light on the culture of it.
Botanists number from forty to sixty species of grapes in the
world. ‘These are widely distributed in the northern hemi-
sphere, all but a few being found in temperate countries. Thus,
more than half of the named species come from the United
States and Canada, while nearly all of the others are from
China and Japan, with but one species certainly growing wild
in southwestern Asia and bordering parts of Europe. All true
grapes have more or less edible fruits, and of the twenty or
more species grown in the New World more than half have been
or are being domesticated. Of the Old World grapes, only one
B :
2 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
species is cultivated for fruit, but this, of all grapes, is of
greatest economic importance and, therefore, deserves first
consideration.
THE EuROPEAN GRAPE
The European grape, Vitis vinifera (Fig. 1), is the grape of
ancient and modern agriculture. It is the vine which Noah
planted after the Deluge ; the vine of Israel and of the Promised
Land ; the vine of the parables in the New Testament. It is the
grape and the vine of the myths, fables, poetry and prose of all
peoples. It is the grape from which the wines of the world are
made. From it come the raisins of the world. It is the chief
agricultural crop of southern Europe and northern Africa and
of vast regions in other parts of the world, having followed
civilized man from place to place in all temperate climates.
The European grape has so impressed itself on the human mind
that when one thinks or speaks of the grape, or of the vine, it is
this Old World species, the vine of antiquity, that presents itself.
The written records of the cultivation of the European grape
go back five or six thousand years. The ancient Egyptians,
Pheenicians, Greeks and Romans grew the vine and made wine
from its fruit. Grape seeds have been found in the remains of
European peoples of prehistoric times, showing that primitive
men enlivened their scanty fare with wild grapes. Cultivation
of the grape in the Old World probably began in the region about
the Caspian Sea where the vine has always run wild. We have
proof of the great antiquity of the grape in Egypt, for its seeds
are found entombed with the oldest mummies. Probably the
Pheenicians, the earliest navigators on the Mediterranean,
carried the grape from Egypt and Syria to Greece, Rome and
other countries bordering on this sea. The domestication of
the grape was far advanced in Christ’s time, for Pliny, writing
then, describes ninety-one kinds of grapes and fifty kinds of
wine.
THE DOMESTICATION OF THE GRAPE 3
It can never be known exactly when the European grape came
under cultivation. There is no word as to what were the
methods and processes of domestication, and whose the minds
and hands that remodeled the wild grape of Europe into the
Fic. 1. A shoot of Vitis vinifera.
4 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
grape of the vineyards. The Old World grape was domesti-
cated long before the faint traditions which have been trans-
mitted to our day could possibly have arisen. For knowledge
of how wild species of this fruit have been and may be brought
under cultivation, we must turn to New World records.
AMERICAN GRAPES
Few other plants in the New World grow wild under such
varied conditions and over such extended areas as the grape.
Wild grapes are found in the warmer parts of New Brunswick ;
on the shores of the Great Lakes; everywhere in the wood-
lands of the North and Middle Atlantic states; on the limestone
soils of Kentucky, Tennessee and the Virginias; and they
thrive in the sandy woods, sea plains and reef-keys of the
South Atlantic and Gulf states. While not so common west
of the Mississippi, yet some kind of wild grape is found from
North Dakota to Texas; grapes grow on the mountains and
in the cafions of all the Rocky Mountain states; and several
species thrive on the Mexican borders and in the far Southwest.
While it is possible that all American grapes have descended
from an original species, the types are now as diverse as the
regions they inhabit. The wild grapes of the forests have
long slender trunks and branches, whereby their leaves are
better exposed to the sunlight. Two shrubby species do not
attain a greater height than four or five feet; these grow in
sandy soils, or among rocks exposed to sun and air. Another
runs on the ground and bears foliage almost evergreen. The
stem of one species attains a diameter of a foot, bearing its
foliage in a great canopy. From this giant form the species
vary to slender, graceful, climbing vines. Wild grapes are as
varied in climatic adaptations as in structure of vine and grow
luxuriantly in every condition of heat or cold, wetness or dry-
ness, capable of supporting fruit-culture in America. So
THE DOMESTICATION OF THE GRAPE 5
many of the kinds have horticultural possibilities that it seems
certain that some grape can be domesticated in all of the agri-
cultural regions of the country, their natural plasticity indi-
cating, even if it were not known from experience, that all can
be domesticated.
Leif the Lucky, the first European to visit America, if the
Icelandic records are true, christened the new land Wineland.
It has been supposed that this designation was given for the
grapes, but recent investigations show that the fruits were
probably mountain cranberries. Captain John Hawkins, who
visited the Spanish settlements in Florida in 1565, mentions
wild grapes among the resources of the New World. Amadas
and Barlowe, sent out by Raleigh in 1584, describe the coasts
of the Carolinas as, “so full of grapes that in all the world like
abundance cannot be found.” Captain John Smith, writing
in 1606, describes the grapes of Virginia and recommends the
culture of the vine as an industry for the newly founded colony.
Few, indeed, are the explorers of the Atlantic seaboard who do
not mention grapes among the plants of the country. Yet
none saw intrinsic value in these wild vines. To the Europeans,
the grapes of the Old World alone were worth ‘cultivating,
and the vines growing everywhere in America only suggested
that the grape they had known across the sea might be grown
in the new home.
That American viticulture must depend on the native species
for its varieties began to be recognized at the beginning of the
nineteenth century, when several large companies engaged in
growing foreign grapes failed, and a meritorious native grape
made its appearance. The vine of promise was a variety
known as the Alexander. Thomas Jefferson, ever alert for
the agricultural welfare of the nation, writing in 1809 to John
Adlum, one of the first experimenters with an American species,
voiced the sentiment of grape experimenters in speaking of
the Alexander: “I think it will be well to push the culture
6 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
of this grape without losing time and efforts in the search of
foreign vines, which it will take centuries to adapt to our soil
and climate.”
Fic. 2. A shoot of Vitis Labrusca.
Alexander is an offshoot of the common fox-grape, V2tis
Labrusca (Fig. 2), found in the woods on the Atlantic coast from
Maine to Georgia and occasionally in the Mississippi Valley. The
history of the variety dates back to before the Revolutionary
THE DOMESTICATION OF THE GRAPE 7
War, when, according to William Bartram, the Quaker botanist,
it was found growing in the vicinity of Philadelphia, by John
Alexander, gardener to Governor Penn of Pennsylvania.
Curiously enough, it came into general cultivation through
the deception of a nurseryman. Peter Legaux, a French-
American grape-grower, in 1801 sold the Kentucky Vineyard
Society fifteen hundred grape cuttings which he said had been
taken from an European grape introduced from the Cape of
Good Hope, therefore called the “Cape” grape. Legaux’s
grape turned out to be the Alexander. In the new home the
spurious Cape grew wonderfully well and as the knowledge of
its fruitfulness in Kentucky, Ohio and Indiana spread, demand
for it increased, and with remarkable rapidity, considering
the time, it came into general cultivation in the parts of the
United States then settled.
The Labrusca or fox-grapes.
Of the several species of American grapes now under culti-
vation, the Labrusca, first represented by the Alexander, has
furnished more cultivated varieties than all the other American
species together, no less than five hundred of its varieties havy-
ing been grown in the vineyards of the country. There are
several reasons why it is the most generally cultivated species.
It is native to the parts of the United States in which agriculture
soonest advanced to a state where fruits were desired. In the
wild, the Labruscas are the most attractive, being largest and
handsomest in color; among all grapes it alone shows black-,
white- and red-fruited forms on wild vines. There is a northern
and a southern form of the species, and its varieties are, there-
fore, widely adapted to climates and to soils. The flavor of
the fruits of this species, all things considered, is rather better
than that of any other of our wild grapes, though the skins
in most of its varieties have a peculiar aroma, somewhat pro-
nounced in the well-known Concord, Niagara and Worden,
8 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
which is disagreeable to tastes accustomed to the pure flavors
of the European grapes. All Labruscas submit well to vineyard
operations and are vigorous, hardy and productive, though
they are more subject to the dreaded phylloxera than are most
of the other cultivated native species. Of the many grapes
of this type, at least two deserve brief historical mention.
Catawba, probably a pure-bred Labrusca, the first American
grape of commercial importance, is the most interesting variety
of its species. The origin of the variety is not certainly known,
but all evidence points to its having been found about the year
1800 on the banks of the Catawba River, North- Carolina.
It was introduced into general cultivation by Major John -
Adlum, soldier of the Revolution, judge, surveyor and author
of the first American book on grapes. Adlum maintained
an experimental vineyard in the District of Columbia, whence
in 1823 he began the distribution of the Catawba. At that
time the center of American grape culture was about Cincin-
nati, and an early shipment of Adlum’s Catawbas went to
Nicholas Longworth of that city and was by him distributed
throughout the grape-growing centers of the country. As
one of the first to test new varieties of American grapes, to
grow them largely and to make wine commercially from them,
Nicholas Longworth is known as the “father of American
grape culture.”
Catawba is still one of the four leading varieties in the vine-
yards of eastern America. The characters whereby its high
place is maintained among grapes are: Great elasticity of
constitution, by reason of which the vine is adapted to many
environments; rich flavor, long-keeping quality, and hand-
some appearance of fruit, qualities which make it a very good
dessert grape; high sugar-content and a rich flavor of juice,
so that from its fruit is made a very good wine and a very good
grape-juice; and vigor, hardiness and productiveness of vine.
The characters of Catawba are readily transmissible, and it
THE DOMESTICATION OF THE GRAPE 9
has many pure-bred or hybrid offspring which more or less
resemble it.
The second commercial grape of importance in American
viticulture is Concord, which came from the seed of a wild
grape planted in the fall of 1843 by Ephraim W. Bull, Concord,
Massachusetts. The new variety was disseminated in the
spring of 1854, and from the time of its introduction the spread
of its culture was phenomenal. By 1860 it was the leading
grape in America and it so remains. Concord furnishes, with
the varieties that have sprung from it, seventy-five per cent of
the grapes grown in eastern America. The characters which
distinguish the vine are: Adaptability to various soils, fruit-
fulness, hardiness and resistance to diseases and insects. The
fruits are distinguished by certainty of maturity, attractive
appearance, good but not high flavor, and by the fact that
they may be produced so cheaply that no other grape can com-
pete with this variety in the markets. Concord is, as Horace
Greeley well denominated it in awarding the Greeley prize
for the best American grape, “the grape for the millions.”
The histories of these two grapes are typical of those of five
hundred or more other Labruscas. Out of a prodigious num-
ber of native seedlings, an occasional one is found greatly to
excel its fellows and is brought under cultivation.
The Rotundifolia or Muscadine grapes.
Long before the northern Labruscas had attained prominence
in the vineyards of the North, a grape had been domesticated
partially in the South. It is Vitis rotundifolia (Fig. 3), a species
which runs riot from the Potomac to the Gulf, thriving in many
diverse soils, but growing only in the southern climate and
preferring the seacoast. Rotundifolia grapes have been culti-
vated somewhat for fruit or ornament from the earliest colonial
times. It is certain that wine was made from this species by
the English settlers at Jamestown. Vines of it are now to be
10 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
found on arbors, in gardens or half wild on fences in nearly
every farm in the South Atlantic states. That the Rotundifolias
have not been more generally brought under cultivation is due
)
aan |
I
K{')
x
Ai \
il
i"
Fic. 3.
+
.
<
‘
ca 4
4
|
a2 »
rama
CHAPTER IV
STOCKS AND RESISTANT VINES
PHYLLOXERA, a tiny root-louse, made its appearance in
France in 1861 and began multiplying with a fury unparalleled
in the insect world. By 1874, the pest had become so wide-
spread in Europe that it threatened the very existence of the
great vineyard industry of that continent. All attempts to
bring the pest under control failed, although the French gov-
ernment offered a reward of 300,000 francs for a satisfactory
remedy. Numerous methods of treating the soil to check
the ravages of the insect were tried, also, but none was effica-
cious. Finally, it dawned on European vineyardists that
phylloxera is not a scourge in America, its habitat, and that
European vineyards might be saved by grafting Vinifera vines
on the roots of immune American grapes. At once the recon-
struction of vineyards in Europe was begun by grafting the
grapes on phylloxera-resistant roots. Meanwhile, consterna-
tion spread to California when it was discovered that phylloxera
was running riot in some of the vineyards of the Pacific slope ;
however, with the knowledge derived from viticulturists in
Europe, they too began reconstructing vineyards on immune
roots, without the same success as the Europeans, it is true,
but with such measure of success that it soon became the
approved method of growing grapes in this great region.
Through the use of resistant stocks, phylloxera is now defied
in Vinifera regions. Millions of American stocks are annually
struck at home, in Europe and wherever Vinifera grapes are
grown, to be top-worked with varieties susceptible to phylloxera.
Seldom has mastery over a pest been so complete; but, to
61
62 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
triumph over the tiny insect, the industry has had to be revo-
lutionized. Resistant stocks, in their turn, brought innumer-
able new problems, many of which are still unsolved. Investi-
gations and experiences in rehabilitating vineyards have been
carried on for forty years, the results set forth in books and
bulletins and yet there are many problems to be solved. The
grape-grower in regions infested with phylloxera is always
under the necessity of taking advantage of the latest demonstra-
tion of practices in the use of resistant stocks. These practices
are best studied in the experiments of state experiment stations
and the United States Department of Agriculture, and in the
vineyards of leading grape-growers, since even those most
needing elucidation can be but briefly discussed in the following
paragraphs.
The wild vines of a species are always seedlings and are
hence exceedingly variable. The first vineyards of resistant
stocks were vines grafted on stocks of wild vines, and the
results were very unsatisfactory; for, naturally, there was
divergence in many characters and especially in the vigor of the
vines. Also, there was difficulty in grafting, since some wild
vines are stout and others slender; some bear grafts well, while
others do not. It soon became apparent that to succeed,
varieties must be selected from the different species for vine-
yard work. The great task of the experimenter and grape-
grower, therefore, has been to select varieties of the several
species sufficiently resistant, vigorous and otherwise possessed
of characters fitting them to become good stocks. Out of
vast numbers tested, a few are now generally recognized as
best for the several groups of Vinifera grapes and the several
distinct regions in which these grapes are grown.
Resistant species and varieties.
The reconstruction of phylloxera-ridden vineyards by the
use of resistant stocks is possible only because some species
STOCKS AND RESISTANT VINES 63
and varieties are, as has been said, more resistant to the root-
louse than others. All degrees of resistance exist, as would
be suspected, from immunity to great susceptibility. It is
obvious that the foundation of the art of growing resistant
vineyards is exact knowledge of the immunities and suscepti-
bilities of the many varieties and species of grapes. From the
first use of resistant vines, experimenters everywhere have set
themselves at work to determine not only what the most resist-
ant vines are, but what the causes and conditions of immunity.
In spite of a wealth of empirical discoveries as to what grapes
can best resist the root-louse, causes and most of the conditions
of immunity are still little understood. Definite, useful knowl-
edge, so far, goes little further than the establishment of lists
of species and varieties, the latter subject to change, that are
most useful in setting resistant vineyards.
Phylloxera does little damage to species of Vitis native to
the same general region in which the pest has its habitat, but
nevertheless there are some differences in resistance in American
grapes. Munson, one of the best American authorities on
the resistance of species to phylloxera, says:! “ Rotundifolia
is entirely immune, then Rupestris, Vulpina, Cinerea, Ber-
landieri, Champini, Candicans, Doaniana, stivalis and Lince-
cumii are so high in resistance as to be practically uninjured,
though they may be attacked, while Labrusca is low in resist-
ance and is much weakened in clay soils, if infested, and Vinif-
era is entirely non-resistant.”” Some of these species are hard
to propagate and difficult to suit in soil and climate so that but
two of them are much used for resistant stocks. The two most
used are Rupestris and Vulpina (Riparia), of both of which there
are varieties which give satisfaction. Bioletti, a leading author-
ity on resistant stocks in California, says :?
1 Munson, T. V. Foundations of American Grape Culture, 217.
1909.
2 Bioletti, Frederic T. Calif. Exp. Sta., Bul. 180: 96-97. 1906.
64 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
“Varieties of resistant stocks which will in all probability
be used in California are Rupestris St. George (du Lot), Riparia
< Rupestris 3306, Riparia x Rupestris 3309, Riparia Solonis
1616, Mourvédre X Rupestris 1202, Aramon X Rupestris 2, Ri-
paria gloire, and Riparia grande glabre. These are all varieties
which have given excellent varieties for years in Europe, and
have all been tested successfully in California. Among them
are varieties suitable for nearly all the vineyard soils of Cali-
fornia, with perhaps the exception of some of the heavier clays.
“The only one of these varieties which has been planted
extensively in California is the Rupestris St. George. There
can be little doubt, however, that it will fail to give satisfaction
in many soils, and though we may not find something better
for all our soils it is probable that we will repeat the experience
of Southern France and find that in most soils there is some
other variety that gives better results. Without attempting
to describe these varieties, but to give some idea of their merits
and defects and of the soils most suited to each, the following
indications are given, based principally on the opinions of L.
Ravaz and Prosper Gervais, and on a still limited experience
in California :
“The Rupestris St. George is remarkably vigorous and grows
very large, supporting the graft well even without stakes.
It roots easily and makes excellent unions with most vinifera
varieties. It is well suited to deep soils where its roots can
penetrate. Its defects are that it is very subject to root-rot,
especially in moist soils; it suckers badly and it suffers from
drought in shallow soils. Its great vigor produces coulure with
some varieties and often necessitates long pruning.
“Tn moist or wet soils 1616 or 3306 had given better results
in France and gives indications of doing equally well here. In
drier soils 3309 will probably be found preferable.
“Aramon Rupestris No. 2 is suited to the same soils as
Rupestris St. George, and does particularly well in extremely
STOCKS AND RESISTANT VINES 65
gravelly soils. It has some of the defects of the St. George
and is moreover more difficult to graft, and its only advantage
in California is that it is rather less susceptible to root-rot.
“There are no better resistant stocks than Riparia gloire and
Riparia grande glabre, wherever they are put in soils that suit
them. They do well, however, only in deep, rich, alluvial
soils which are neither too wet nor too dry. Their grafts are
the most productive of all, and ripen their grapes from one to
two weeks earlier than the grafts on St. George. Their prin-
cipal defect is that they are very particular as to the soil, and
they never grow quite as large as the cion. The gloire is the
most vigorous, and the difference of diameter is less with this
variety than with any other Riparia.
“The Mourvédre X Rupestris 1202 is extremely vigorous,
roots and grafts easily, and is well adapted to rich, sandy and
moist soils. In drier and poorer soils its resistance is perhaps
not sufficient.
“The most promising varieties for general use at present
seem to be the two hybrids of Riparia and Rupestris, 3306
and 3309. They have great resistance to the phylloxera,
root and graft almost as easily as St. George, and are quite
sufficiently vigorous to support any variety of vinifera. The
former is more suited to the moister soils and wherever there
is danger of root-rot, and the latter to the drier soils. In gen-
eral, they are suited to a larger variety of soils and condition
than perhaps any other varieties.
“Riparia gloire should be planted only on rich, deep alluvial
soil containing an abundance of plant food and humus, what
would be called good garden land, such as river bank soil not
liable to overflow.
“Tn most other soils Riparia X Rupestris 3306 is to be recom-
mended, except those that are rather dry, where 3309 is to be
preferred, or those which are very wet, where Solonis X Riparia
1616 is surer to give good results.”
F
66 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
The value of a species or variety for a resistant stock may be
judged somewhat by the visible effect of the phylloxera on the
roots of the vines. On susceptible species, the punctures of
the insects rapidly produce swellings which vary in size and
number in accordance with resistance of the species. ‘Techni-
cally, the first swelling on the young tender rootlets of the vine
is called a nodosity. The presence of a few nodosities on the
root system does not indicate that a vine is not a valuable
resistant stock. When the nodosity begins to decay and
becomes of a cancerous nature, it is called a tuberosity. These
tuberosities decay more or less rapidly and deeply, and when
they rot deeply cause enfeeblement or death to the vine. Thus,
on Vinifera varieties the tuberosities are several times larger
and decay sets in much more quickly than on American species
which show these tuberosities. Ratings as to resistance of
species are usually made from the size and number of the
tuberosities, though when these are found producing a scab-like
wound which scales off, there may be high resisting power.
In order to convey with some degree of definiteness the power
of resistance to phylloxera, an arbitrary scale has been agreed
on by viticulturists. In this scale, maximum resistance is
indicated by 20 and minimum by 0. Thus, the resisting power
of a good Vulpina is put as 19.5 and that of a poor Vinifera
variety as 0.
ADAPTATIONS OF RESISTANT STOCKS TO SOILS AND CLIMATES
Resistance, of course, counts for naught in a stock which
comes from a species unsuited to the soil and climate or other
circumstances of the locality in which the vineyard is to be
planted. The several species used for stocks differ widely
in the requirements affecting growth so that the grower must
make certain that the resistant stock he selects will find con-
genial surroundings. Stocks in congenial circumstances are
STOCKS AND RESISTANT VINES 67
frequently more resistant than others inherently more resistant,
but which are not otherwise adapted to the particular condi-
tions. of the vineyard. Species of grapes vary greatly in their
root systems, some having thick, others slender roots; the
roots of some are soft, of others hard; some have roots going
down deeply, others are almost at the surface of the ground.
Manifestly these various root-forms are but adaptations to
loose and heavy, dry and moist, deep and shallow soils, or to
some circumstance of climate. A vine bruised by adversity
is in no condition to withstand phylloxera. Therefore, since
the adaptability of a variety to a soil or climate may be changed
by the stock, the adaptations of stocks to soils and climates
must have attention.
Affinity of stock and cion.
Different varieties of grapes do not behave alike on the same
stocks, and different stocks may affect varieties differently.
Even when the kinship is close, some grapes resist all the
appliances of art to make a successful union; while, on the
other hand, quite distinct species often seem foreordained to
be joined. For example, Rotundifolia, which has the highest
resistance to phylloxera of any species, is useless as a stock
because it is impossible to graft any other grape on it, while
Vulpina and Rupestris unite readily with varieties of Vinifera,
the slight decrease in the vigor of the grafted vines serving
oftentimes to increase fruitfulness. - Something more is neces-
sary, then, than botanical kinship. Just what is necessary,
no one knows, beyond: that there must be conformity in habit
between stock and cion; that the two must start in growth at
approximately the same time; and that the tissues must be
sufficiently alike that there be proper contact in the union.
Yet these facts do not sufficiently explain all of the affinities
and antipathies which species and varieties of grapes show to
each other. Unfortunately, the grape-grower has had but
68 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
little to guide him in selecting stocks and has had to learn by
making repeated trials.
PrRorPeR PLANTING OF GRAFTED VINES
Europeans and Californians long ago learned that failures
with grafted vines often came from setting the vines too deep
in the soil, the result being that the cions struck root and
became independent, whereupon the stock dies or becomes so
moribund that the beneficial effects are lost. There are grape-
growers who argue that it is beneficial to the vine to have roots
from both stock and cion, but experience and experiments very
generally teach the contrary, it being found that in most grafts
the cion roots grow more vigorously than stock roots and
eventually starve out the latter. The disastrous effects of
cion-rooting are often to be found, also, when grafting has been
done on old vines in the vineyard; and, again, when the graft
is too close to the root system.
Another cause of failure is that different stocks require that
the vineyard soil be treated differently, especially at planting
time. Vulpina stocks require that the soil be much more
deeply plowed than for Viniferas on their own roots, since
Vulpinas are deep-rooted and are exacting in the depth of
root-run required. Those who have had most experience with
resistant stocks maintain that all American grapes require
rather deeper plowing than European grapes on their own roots.
INFLUENCE OF THE STOCKS ON THE CION
Up to the present, the growing of grafted grapes has been
carried on with little thought of the mutual influence of stock
and cion; grapes have been grafted only to secure vines resistant
to phylloxera. Yet there can be no doubt that stock and cion
react on one another, and that any variety of grapes is influenced
a a ae
STOCKS AND RESISTANT VINES 69
for better or worse in characters of vine and fruit by the stock
upon which it is grafted. A plant is a delicate mechanism,
easily thrown out of gear, and all plants, the grape not the
least, are more or less changed in the adjustments of stock and
cion. One could fill a large volume on the supposed reciprocal
influence of stock and cion in fruits. Space suffices, here,
however, to mention only those proved and those having to do
with the influence of the stock on the cion when the grape is
grafted.
Influence of stocks on European grapes summarized.
Common experience in Europe and California indicates that
varieties of Vinifera grapes grafted on resistant stocks which
are perfectly adapted to soil and climate produce not only
larger crops but sweeter or sourer grapes; that the crop ripens
earlier or later; that the vine is often more vigorous; and that
there are some minor differences depending on the stock used.
Winemakers assert that the character of their product may be
affected for better or worse by the stock. Often vines are so
improved by grafting that the extra expense of the operation
and of the stock is paid for; although, to be sure, about as
often the effects are deleterious. The successes and failures of
vineyards on resistant stocks make plain that the vine-grower
must study the many problems which stocks present and exer-
cise utmost intelligence in the selection of the proper stock.
Influence of stocks on American grapes.
No doubt American species of grapes may be as profoundly
modified by stocks as the European species, but there is but
little evidence on this phase of grape-growing to be drawn from
the experience of vineyardists. One rather conclusive experi-
ment, however, shows that American grapes may be improved
by growing them on stocks which give them better adaptations
to their environment. The experiment was tried in the Chau-
70 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
tauqua grape-belt in western New York by the New York
Agricultural Experiment Station. The test was carried on
for eleven years, during which time many interesting possibilities
in grafting grapes in this region came to light. It was proved
that the stock materially affects the vigor and productiveness
of the vine and the quality of the grapes. The following brief
account is taken from Bulletin No. 355 of the New York
Station :
In this experiment a number of varieties were grafted on St.
George, Riparia Gloire and Clevener stocks, and a fourth
group on their own roots. The varieties grafted were: Agawam,
Barry, Brighton, Brilliant, Campbell Early, Catawba, Con-
cord, Delaware, Goff, Herbert, Iona, Jefferson, Lindley, Mills,
Niagara, Regal, Vergennes, Winchell and Worden. The
planting plan and all of the vineyard operations were those
common in commercial vineyards. ; 7
Yearly accounts of the vineyard show that the vines passed
through many vicissitudes. The experiment was started in
1902 when St. George and Riparia Gloire stocks from Cali-
fornia were set and grafted in the field. Many of these died
the first year. The winter of 1903-04 was unusually severe, and
many more vines were either killed or so severely injured that
they died during the next two years. The vines on St. George,
a very deep-rooting grape, withstood the cold best. Fidia,
the grape root-worm, was found in the vineyards early in the
life of the vines and did much damage in some years. In the
years of 1907 and 1909 the crops were ruined by hail.
But despite these serious setbacks it was evident throughout
the experiment that the grafted grapes made better vines and
were more productive than those on their own roots. As an
example of the differences in yield, a summary of the data for
1911 may be given. In this year, an average of all the varieties
on own roots yielded at the rate of 4.39 tons to the acre; on
St. George, 5.36 tons; on Gloire, 5.32 tons; on Clevener, 5.62
STOCKS AND RESISTANT VINES 71
tons. The crops on the grafted vines were increased through
the setting of more bunches and the development of larger
bunches and berries.
The grapes on the vines grafted on Gloire and Clevener
ripened a few days earlier than those on their own roots, while
with St. George a few varieties were retarded in ripening.
Changing the time of maturity may be very important in grape
regions where there is danger of early frost to late-ripening
sorts, and where it is often desirable to retard the harvest time
of early grapes.
In the behavior of the vines, the results correspond closely
with those given for yields. In the growth ratings of varieties
on different stocks, the varieties on their own roots were rated
in vigor at 40; on St. George, at 63.2; on Gloire, at 65.2; on
Clevener, at 67.9. There is no way of deciding how much
the thrift of the vines depends on adaptability to soil, and how
much on other factors. Since all of the varieties were more
productive and vigorous on grafted vines than on their own roots
it may be said that a high degree of congeniality exists between
the stocks and varieties under test.
The experiment suggests that it would be profitable to grow
fancy grapes of American species on grafted vines, and that
it is well within the bounds of possibility that main-crop grapes
can be grafted profitably. In the general tuning-up of agri-
culture now in progress, it may be expected that soon Ameri-
can as well as European varieties of grapes will be grown under
some conditions and for some purposes on roots other than
their own.
Direct PRODUCERS
Attempts innumerable have been and are still being made to
secure, by hybridizing |’. vinifera and American species of
grapes, varieties that will resist phylloxera, the mildew and
black-rot. The grapes of this continent are relatively immune
(074 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
to all of these troubles, and if hybrids could be obtained to
produce directly, without grafting, grapes with the good qualities
of the Viniferas—in short, European grapes on American
vines — the cultivated grape flora of the whole world might
be changed. So far, a “direct producer” that is wholly satis-
factory in either Europe or California has not been found for
the wine or raisin industries, although a number of varieties
are rated as very good table grapes, and a few are used in wine-
making. The best of the direct producers are Lenoir, Taylor,
Noah, Norton’s Virginia, Autuchon, Othello, Catawba, and
Delaware.
Puate V.— Vinifera grapes grown out of doors in New York.
Top, Malvasia; bottom, Chasselas Golden.
CHAPTER V
THE VINEYARD AND ITS MANAGEMENT
A VINEYARD is more artificial than other plantations of fruits,
since the vine requires greater discipline under cultivation
than tree or bush. Yet greater art is required only when the
attempt is made to grow the grape to perfection, for the vine
bears fruit if left to indulge in riotous growth wheresoever it
can strike root. Vineyard management, therefore, may repre-
sent the consummate art of three thousand or more years of
cultural subserviency; or it may be so primeval in simplicity
as to approach neglect. The grape is so wonderfully responsive
to good care, however, that no true lover of fruit will profane
it with neglect, but will seek, rather, to give it a favorable
situation, its choice of soils and such generous care as will insure
strong, vigorous, productive vineyards of choicely good fruit.
Grape-growing is a specialists’ business, for the culture of the
grape is unlike that of any other fruit. The essentials of vine-
yard management, however, are easily learned. Indeed, care
of the vine comes almost instinctively; for the grape has been
cultivated since prehistoric times and the races of the world
are so familiar with it through sacred literatures, myths, fables,
stories and poetry, that its care is prompted by natural impulse.
The grape has followed civilized man so closely from place to
place through the temperate climates of the world, that rules
and methods of culture have been developed for almost every
condition under which it will grow, so that every grape-grower
may profit by the successes and failures of the generations
73
74 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
that preceded him. Grape-growing is not, however, an art
wholly governed by rules of the past to be carried on by com-
mon laborers who use hands only, but is one in which its fol-
lowers may make use of science and may put thought, skill
and taste into their work.
LAYING OuT THE VINEYARD
Vineyards are laid out for the most part after accepted pat-
terns for each of the great grape regions of America. The vines
are always planted in rectangles, usually at a less distance
apart in the rows than the rows are from each other, but some-
times in squares. Pride in appearance and convenience in
vineyard operations make perfect alignment imperative. Many
varieties of grapes, especially of American species, are partially
self-sterile, so that some varieties must have others interplanted
with them for cross-pollination. This is usually done by set-
ting alternate rows of the variety to be pollinated and the cross-
pollinator. All self-fertile varieties are set in solid blocks be-
cause of convenience in harvesting.
Direction of rows.
Some grape-growers attach considerable importance to the
direction in which rows run, holding either that the full blaze
of the sun at mid-day is desirable for vine, soil and fruit, or
that it is detrimental. Those who desire to provide fullest
exposure to the sun plant rows east and west when the distance
between vines is less than the distance between rows; north
and south when vines are farther apart in the row than the rows
are from each other. When shade seems more desirable, these
directions are reversed. Most often, however, the rows are
laid out in accordance with the shape of the vineyard; or, if
the land is hilly, the rows follow the contour of the declivities
to prevent soil erosion by heavy rains.
THE VINEYARD AND ITS MANAGEMENT 75
Alleys.
For convenience in vineyard operations, especially spraying
and harvesting, there should always be alleys through a vine-
yard. On hilly lands, the alleys are located to secure ease in
hauling; on level lands they are usually arranged to cut the
vineyards into blocks twice as long as wide. An alley is usually
made by leaving out a row of vines. Many vineyards are laid
out with rows far enough apart so that alleys are not needed.
Distances between rows and plants.
There are great variations in the distances between rows and
plants in different regions, and distances vary somewhat in
any one region. Distances are influenced by the following
considerations: Rich soils and large vigorous varieties require
greater distances than poor soils and less vigorous varieties;
sometimes, however, it is necessary to crowd a variety in the
vineyard so that by reducing its vigor fruitfulness may be pro-
moted. Usually the warmer the climate, or the exposure, the
greater should be the distance between vines. Very often the
topography of the land dictates planting distances. But while
taking in account the preceding considerations, which rightly
suggest the distances between plants in the row, convenience
in vineyard operations is the factor that most often fixes the
distance between rows. The rows must be far enough apart
in commercial vineyards to permit the use of two horses in
plowing, spraying and harvesting.
Planted in squares, the distance varies from seven feet in
garden culture to nine feet in commercial vineyards for eastern
America. More often, however, the rows are eight or nine
feet apart, with the vines six, seven or eight and in the South
ten or twelve feet apart in the rows. Planting distances are
less, as a rule, on the Pacific slope than in eastern regions; that
is, the distances between the rows are the same, to permit work
76 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
with teams, but the distance between plants in the rows is
less, sometimes being no greater than three and a half or four
feet. The rank-growing Rotundifolias of the southern states
need much room, nine by sixteen feet being none too much.
Sunshine must govern the distance apart somewhat. Grapes
picked in the pleached alleys of closely set vineyards of the
North and East are few, small and poor; farther south, shade
from the vines may be a requisite for a good crop.
The number of vines to the acre must be determined before
growing or buying plants. This is done by multiplying the
distance in feet between the rows by the distance the plants
are apart in the row, and dividing 43,560, the number of square
feet in an acre, by the product.
PREPARATION FOR PLANTING
It is impossible to put too much emphasis on the necessity
of thorough preparation of the land before planting the grape.
Extra expenditure to secure good tilth is amply repaid by
increased growth in the grape, and all subsequent care may
fail to start the vines in vigorous growth if the land is not in
good tilth preparatory to planting. The vineyard is to stand
a generation or more, and its soil is virtually immortal, two
facts to suggest perfect preparation. The land should be thor-
oughly well plowed, harrowed, mixed and smoothed. The
better this work is done, the greater the potentialities of the
vineyard. Here, indeed, is a time to be mindful of the adage
which comes from Cato, a sturdy old Roman grape-grower of
2000 years ago: “The face of the master is good for the land.”
Preparation is a series of operations in which it is wise to take
advantage of time and begin a year before the vines are to be
set. The land must be put in training to fit it for the long
service it is to render. The two great essentials of preparation
are provision for drainage and thorough cultivation. Both,
THE VINEYARD AND ITS MANAGEMENT 77
to be performed as the well-being of the grape require, take
time, and a year is none too short a period in which to do the
work. Moreover, newly drained and deeply plowed land
requires time for frost, air, sunshine and rain to sweeten and
enliven the soil after the mixture by these operations of live
topsoil with inert subsoil.
Drainage.
The ideal soil, as we are often told, resembles a sponge, and
is capable of retaining the greatest possible amount of plant-
food dissolved in water, and at the same time is permeable for
air. This ideal, sponge-like condition is particularly desirable
for the grape, especially native species, because the vines of
all are exceedingly deep-rooted. Moreover, grapes thrive
best in a warm soil. While, therefore, the roots may make
good use of nutritious solutions, if not too diluted, in an un-
drained soil, they suffocate and do not receive sufficient bottom
heat. It must be made emphatic that the grape will not
thrive in water-logged land.
Unless the land is naturally well drained, under-drainage
must be provided as the first step in the preparation of land for
the vineyard. ‘Tile-draining is usually best done by those who
make land-draining their business, but information as to every
requirement of land and detail of work may be secured from
many texts, so that grape-growers may perform the work for
themselves. In concluding the topic, the reader must be
reminded that high and hill lands are not necessarily well
drained, and low lands are not necessarily wet even if the sur-
face is level. Often hilltops and hillsides need artificial drain-
ing; much less often valley lands and level lands may not
need it. To assume, too, that gravelly and shaley soils are
always well drained often leads directly contrary to the truth.
Sandy and gravelly soils need drainage nearly as often as
loamy and clayey ones.
18 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
Following tiling, if the land has had to be under-drained,
the vineyard should be graded to fill depressions and to make
the surface uniform. Usually this can be done with cutaway,
tooth or some other. harrow, but sometimes the grader or
road-scraper must be put in use.
Fitting the land.
Preparatory cultivation should begin the spring preceding
planting by deep plowing. If the land has been used long for
general farming so that a hard plow-sole has been formed by
years of shallow plowing, a subsoil-plow should follow in the
furrow of the surface plow, although it is seldom advisable to
go deeply into the true hardpan. Fitting the land must not
stop here but should continue through the summer with harrow
and cultivator to pulverize the soil almost to its ultimate
particles. Such cultivation can be sufficiently thorough, and
be made at the same time profitable, by growing some hoed
crop which requires intensive culture. If the soil lacks humus,
a cover-crop of clover or other legume might well be sown in
early summer to be plowed under in late fall. Or, if stable
manure is available, this generally should be applied the fall
before planting. Stable manure applied at this time to a soil
inclined to be niggardly puts an atmosphere in the forth-
coming vineyard wholly denied the grower who must rely on
commercial fertilizers.
The land should be plowed again, deeply and as early in
the fall as possible, harrowed thoroughly, or possibly cross-
plowed and then harrowed. The land must go into the winter
ready for early spring planting and the fall work must be done
promptly and with a sturdy team and sharp, bright tools. The
grower must keep in mind that no opportunity will offer during
the life of the vineyard to even up for slackness in the start and
that a vineyard of dingy, unhappy vines may be the result of
neglect at this critical time. Good tilth should proceed until
THE VINEYARD AND ITS MANAGEMENT 79
the earth is fairly animated with growth when the vines are
planted. Plate I] shows a piece of land well fitted for planting.
Marking for planting.
Given level land, a well-made marker, a gentle team and a
careful driver with a surveyor’s eye, and a vineyard may be
marked for planting with a sled-marker, a modified corn-marker
or even a plow. Some such marker method is commonest in
use in laying out vineyard rows, but it is patent to the eye of
every passer-by in grape regions that the commonest method
is not the best to secure perfect alignment of row and vine. The
combination named for good work with any of the marker
methods is found too seldom. If the marker method is used,
it is put in practice as follows: The rows being marked at the
distance decided on, a deep furrow is plowed along the row by
going both ways with the plow; this done, small stakes are set
in the furrow at the proper distances for the vines, taking care
to line them both ways. Planting holes are thus dug in the
furrow with the stakes as a center.
Marking by means of a measuring wire or chain is the best
method of locating vines accurately in a vineyard. The meas-
uring wire varies according to the wishes of the user from two
to three hundred feet or may be even longer. The best wires
are made of annealed steel wire about an eighth of an inch in
diameter. At each end of the wire is a strong iron ring to be
slipped over stakes. The wire is marked throughout its length
by patches of solder at the distances desired between rows of
vines; to make these places more easily seen, pieces of red cloth
are fastened to them. Sometimes this measuring wire is made
of several strands of small wire, giving more flexibility and
making marking easier, since by separating the strands at the
desired points, pieces of cloth may be tied to mark distances.
In using the wire, the side of the vineyard which is to serve
as the base of the square is selected and the wire is stretched,
80 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
leaving at least one rod from road or fence for a headland.
With the wire thus stretched, a stake is placed at each of the
distance tags to represent the first row of vines. Beginning
at the starting point, sixty feet are measured off in the base
line and a temporary stake is set; eighty feet at a right angle |
with the first line are then measured off at the corner stake,
judging the angle with the eye; then run diagonally from
the eighty-foot stake to the sixty-foot stake. If the distance
between the two stakes is one hundred feet, the corner is a
right angle. With the base lines thus started at right angles to
each other, one can measure off with the measuring wire as
large an area as he desires by taking care to have the line each
time drawn parallel with the last, and the stakes accurately
placed at the marking points on the wire.
Still another method which may be put to good use in laying
out a vineyard, especially if the vineyard is small, is to combine
measure and sight. The distances about the vineyard are
measured and stakes set to mark the ends of the rows around
the area. Good stakes can be made from laths pointed at
one end and whitewashed at the other. A line of stakes is
then set across the field each way through the center, in places,
of course, which the two central rows of vines will fill. When
these are in place, if the area is not too large or too hilly, all
measurements can be dispensed with and the vines can be set
by sighting. A man at the end of the row has three laths to
sight by in each row and a second man should drive stakes as
directed by the sighter. Accurate work can be done by this
method, but it requires time, a good eye and much patience
in the man who is sighting.
SELECTING AND PREPARING THE VINES
Young grape vines covet life, for they are usually vigorous
and not easily injured. Hence, the plants may be brought
THE VINEYARD AND ITS MANAGEMENT 81
from a distance without fear of loss. The local nurseryman
is, however, a good adviser as to varieties if he is honest and
intelligent, and, other things equal, he should be patronized.
But if the grower’s needs cannot be met at home, he should
not hesitate to seek a nurseryman at a distance. This is more
necessary with the grape than other fruits because young
grapes are well and cheaply grown in certain localities only.
With the grape, as with all fruit plants, it is much better to
buy from the grower than from tree peddlers.
Selecting vines.
Unless the buyer knows what he wants, selecting vines is
gambling pure and simple. Fortunately, there are several
marks of good vines very helpful to those who know them.
One should first make sure that the roots and tops are alive to
the remotest parts. The vines should have a good clean,
healthy look with trunk diameter large enough to indicate
vigorous growth, and an ample spread of roots. Large size
is not as desirable as firm, well-matured wood and an abun-
dance of roots. Vines with internodes of medium length for
the variety are better than those with great length or very short
internodes. Such precautions as are possible should be taken
to insure varieties true to name, although here the reputation
of the nurseryman must be depended on except for the few
varieties which may be known at sight in the nursery.
First-grade one-year-old vines are usually better than two-
year-olds. Stunted vines are not worth planting and two-year-
old vines are often stunted one-year-olds. A few weak-grow-
ing varieties gain in vigor if allowed to remain in the nursery
two years — three years, never.
Handling and preparing the vines.
The better vines are packed, transported and cared for in
the field, the quicker will the roots take hold and the vines
G
82 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
make the vigorous start on which so much depends. The
nurseryman should be requested not to prune much before
packing and to pack the vines well for shipping. The vines
should be heeled-in as soon as they reach their destination. If
the vines are dry on arrival, they should be drenched well
before heeling-in. It sometimes happens that the vines are
shriveled and shrunken from excessive drying, in which case
the plants often may be brought back to plumpness by burying
them root and branch in damp earth, to remain a week or
possibly two. To heel-in, a trench should be double furrowed
in light, moist soil, the vines spread out in the trench two or
three deep, and then earth shoveled over the roots and half
the tops, sifting it in the roots, after which the soil is firmed.
The vines may thus be kept in good condition for several weeks
if need arises.
The vines are prepared for planting by cutting away all
dead or injured roots and shortening-in the healthy roots.
Grape roots can be cut severely if healthy stubs remain, the
removal of small roots and fibers doing no harm, since fibers
are of value only as indicating that the vine is strong and
vigorous. Fresh fibers come quickly from stout, healthy
roots. Most of the fibers of a transplanted vine die, and
laying them out in the hole to preserve them, as is so often
recommended, is but a useless burial rite. On good healthy
vines, the stubs of the roots, when cut back, will be four to
eight inches in length. The root system having been con-
siderably pruned, the reciprocity between roots and tops
must be taken into account and the top pruned accordingly.
To reduce the work of the leaves to harmonize with the actiy-
ities of the roots, the top should be pruned to a single cane
and two, never more than three, buds. The vine is now ready
for planting and, the soil being in readiness, planting should
proceed apace.
Piate VI. — Black Hamburg (x3).
THE VINEYARD AND ITS MANAGEMENT 83
PLANTING
The dangers and difficulties of planting hardwooded plants
are greatly exaggerated. The tyro, in particular, is impressed
with his responsibilities at this time, and often sends a hurry-up
call to experiment station or nurseryman to “send him a man
to plant.” If the land is properly prepared and the plants
in good condition, the operation of planting is easily, quickly
and safely accomplished. There is no need, in planting the
vine, of such puttering overniceties as laying out the roots to
preserve the fibers, watering each vine as it is set, inserting
the vine in a gingerly fashion to make sure that it stands in
its new abode as it stood in the old, or puddling the roots in
pail or tub of water. On the other hand, the slap-dash method
of a Stringfellow who cuts off all small roots and uses a crow-
bar in place of a spade is not doing duty by the plant, and bury-
ing the roots deep in the earth or covering them close to the
surface is courting failure.
Digging the holes.
This is a simple task in land in good tilth. The holes need
only be large and deep enough to hold the roots without undue
cramping. Herein is again manifested the wisdom of thoroughly
preparing the land; for, in well-prepared land, the hole is
really as large as the vineyard. Even in the condition of poor
tilth, deep holes are often a menace to the life of the plant,
especially if drainage is not provided, for the deep hole becomes
a tub into which water pours and stands to soak the roots of
dying vines. An extra spurt in digging holes cannot take the
place of perfect fitting of the land.
There is nothing to commend the practice of digging holes
in a leisure time that all may be ready when the time to plant
arrives. The vines will strike root best in the freshly turned,
moist soil of newly dug earth, which can be firmly set about
84 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
the roots when the vine is planted. Neither is time saved
in digging beforehand, for the sun-baked and rain-washed sides
of holes long dug would surely have to be pared afresh. It is,
however, quite worth while to throw the surface soil to one
side and that lower to the other, that a spadeful of moist,
virile, surface soil may be put next to the roots.
There are, no doubt, some soils in which the holes might be
blasted out with dynamite, as, for instance, in a shallow soil
with the hardpan near the surface and good subsoil beneath.
It is very questionable, however, whether these defective soils
-should be used for commercial plantings as long as there still
remain unplanted many acres in all grape regions of good deep
land for the grape. To such as are attracted by “dynamite
farming,’ minute descriptions of methods of use of dynamite
and even demonstrations may be secured from manufacturers
of the explosive.
Time to plant.
The best time to plant the vine in cold climates is early spring,
when sun and showers arouse the spirit of growth in plants,
and nutritive solutions proceed quickly and unerringly to their
preappointed places. At this time, the much mutilated vine
can undertake best the double task of making fresh roots and
opening the dormant leaves. Fall planting puts forward the
work, thus diminishing the rush of early spring when vineyard
operations crowd, and, no doubt, when all is favorable, enables
the vines to start a little more quickly. However, there are
frequently serious losses from planting in the fall. In cold
winters the grip of frost is sufficient to wrench the young vine
from its place and sometimes all but heaves it out of the soil.
There is, also, great liability of winter-killing in vines trans-
planted in the autumn, not because of greater tenderness of
the plant, but because of greater porosity of the loosened soil
which enables the cold to strike to a greater depth. These
THE VINEYARD AND ITS MANAGEMENT 85
two objections to fall planting can be overcome largely by
mounding up the earth so as practically to cover the vines,
leveling the mound in early spring; but this extra work more
than offsets the labor saving in fall planting.
In climates in which the soil does not freeze in the winter,
the vines may be set in the autumn if all is favorable. Often,
however, conditions are not favorable to fall planting in warm
climates, since autumn rains frequently soak the soil so that
it cannot be placed properly about the roots; and, moreover,
in a cold, water-logged soil the inactive roots begin to decay ;
or the soil may be too dry for fall planting. Under such condi-
tions, it is often better to delay planting in warm climates until
spring when better soil conditions can be secured. Fall or
spring, the soil should be reasonably dry, warm and mellow
when the work is done. The best time to plant must necessarily
vary from year to year, and the vineyardist must decide exactly
when to undertake planting in accordance with the conditions
of soil and weather, mindful that the Psalmist’s injunction
that there is “a time to plant, and a time to pluck up that
which is planted” is subject to several conditions requiring
judgment. The grape puts out its leaves late in the spring,
making the temptation great to delay planting; late-set plants,
however, need special care lest they suffer from the summer
droughts which annually parch the lands of this continent.
The operation of planting.
All being in readiness, planting proceeds rapidly. A gang
of four men work to advantage. Two dig holes, a third holds
the vines and tramps the earth as the remaining man shovels
in earth. Except in large vineyards, four men are seldom
available, and gangs of two or three must divide the work
among its members as best suits conditions. A _ tree-setting
board is not needed in planting grapes, although some growers
use it. The man who holds the vines in the hole and tramps
86 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
as the shoveler fills, must align the plant after the stake is
removed and see that it stands perpendicularly in the hole.
The stake, a lath, is set in its old place in the hole to serve as a
support for the growing vine and to mark it so that the culti-
vator does not pull up the young plant. The soil must be set
firm about the roots of the plant, but zeal in tramping should
diminish as the hole is filled, leaving the topsoil untramped,
smooth, loose and pulverized, a dust mulch — the best of all
mulches — to prevent evaporation.
The depth to which vines should be set is a matter of con-
troversy. This should be governed by the soil more than by
any other factor, although some varieties need a deeper root-
run than others. The rule to plant to the depth the vine stood
in the nursery row is safe under most conditions, although in
light, hungry or thirsty soils the roots should go deeper; and,
on the other hand, in heavy soils, not so deep. Deep plant-
ing is a more common mistake than shallow planting, for roots
under most conditions stand exposure better than internment,
going down being more natural than coming up for a root seek-
ing a place to its liking.
Watering at planting is necessary only when the land is
parched with drought or in regions in which irrigation is prac-
ticed. When necessary, water should be used liberally, at
least a gallon or two toa vine. After the earth has been firmed
about the roots and the hole is nearly filled, the water should
be poured in and the hole filled without more firming. Under
dry weather conditions, some prefer to puddle the roots; that
is, to dip them in thin mud and plant with the mud adhering.
In making the puddle, loose loam and not sticky clay is used,
as clay may bake so hard as to injure the roots. With puddling,
as with watering, the surface soil should be left loose and soft
without traces of the puddling below.
Manure or fertilizer about the roots or even in the hole are
not necessary or even desirable. If the soil is to be enriched
EE es
THE VINEYARD AND ITS MANAGEMENT 87
at all at planting time, the fertilizer should be spread on the
surface to be cultivated in or to have its food elements leak
down as rains fall. In land in which the providential design
for grapes is plainly manifested, the vine at no time responds
heartily to fertilizers, the good of stable manure probably
coming for the most part from its effects on the texture and
water-holding capacity of the soil. The newly set plant is
not in need of outside nourishment; to put rank manure or
strong commercial fertilizers about the roots of a young newly
set vine is plant infanticide.
CARE OF YOUNG VINES
Virgil calls the period in the life of the vine between the
setting and the first vintage, the “tender nonage,’’ and tells
us that at this time the vines need careful rearing; so they do,
now as then, American grapes as well as the grapes of ancient
Rome. Fortunately, any departure from normal well-being
is easily told in the grape, for the color of the leaf is as accurate
an index to the health and vigor of the vine as the color of the
tongue or the beat of the pulse in man. A change of color
from the luxuriant green of thrifty grape foliage, especially the
yellow hue indicating that the leaf-green is not functioning
properly, suggests that the vines are sick or need nursing in
some detail of care. When all goes well, however, the amazing
energy of Nature is nowhere better seen among plants than
in the growth of the grape, so that much of the care is in the
use of the knife; in fact, as we shall see, the grape almost lives
by the knife the first two years out.
The first year.
The vines having been pruned and staked at planting, these
operations need no attention in the first summer. Many
varieties send up several shoots as growth starts, and, except
88 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
in the case of grafted plants and in the event of the suckers
coming from the stock, these should be left to feed the vine and
help to establish a good root system. Vines making a strong
growth should be tied to the stake, at least the strongest shoot,
to keep the wind from whipping it about and to keep the plants
out of the way of the cultivator. The only knack in tying is
to keep the vine on the windward side of the stake, thus saving
the breaking of tying material.
The first year’s pruning, though severe, is easily done. All
but the strongest cane are cut out and this is pruned back to
two buds, nearly to the ground, so that the vines are much as
when set in the vineyard. This pruning, and that of the next
two years, has as the object the establishment of a good root
system and the production of a sturdy trunk at the height
at which the vine is to be headed. It is important that the
cane from which the trunk is to come be healthy and the wood
well ripened. Pruning may be done at any time after the
leaves fall, though most growers give preference to late winter.
In cold climates it is a good practice to plow up to the young
vines for winter protection, in which case the pruning should
be done before plowing.
Every detail of vineyard management should be performed
with care and at the accepted time in this critical first year.
Cultivation must be intensive, insects and fungi must be warded
off, mechanical injuries avoided, -vines that have refused to
grow must be marked for discard, and the vineyard be put
down to a cover-crop in early August if it was not earlier planted
to some hoed catch-crop.
The second year.
Work begins in the spring of the second year with the setting
of trellis posts on which one wire is put up. The vine is not
yet ready to train but the slender lath of the first season is
not sufficient support, and the one wire on the future trellis
THE VINEYARD AND ITS MANAGEMENT 89
saves the expense of staking. Tying requires some care and
is usually done with string or bast. As the summer proceeds,
suckers from the roots are removed and some growers thin the
shoots on the young vine; some think it necessary also to top
the growth if it becomes too luxuriant and so keep the cane
within bounds. Suckers must be cut or broken off at the points
where they originate, otherwise several new ones may start
from the base of the old. If the vines are topped, it must be
kept in mind that summer pruning is weakening, and the tips
of shoots should, therefore, be taken when small, the object
being to direct the growth into those parts of the vine which
are to become permanent.
Pruning, the second winter the vine is out, depends on the
vigor of the plant. If a strong, healthy, well-matured cane
over-tops the lower wire of the trellis, it should be cut back so
that the cane may be tied to the wire; otherwise the vine should
again be cut almost to the ground, leaving but three or four
buds. Ifthe cane be left, in addition to sturdiness and maturity,
it should be straight, for it is to become the trunk of the mature
vine. The training of the young vine is now at an end, for
the next season the vine must be started toward its permanent
form, instructions for which are given in the chapter on pruning.
The summer care of the vineyard does not differ materially
in the second year from that of the first. Intensive cultivation
continues, the vines are treated for pests and the annual cover-
crop follows cultivation. Many varieties, if vigorous, will
set some fruit in this second summer, but the crop should not
be allowed to mature, the sooner removed the better, as fruit-
ing at this stage of growth seriously weakens the young vines.
CATCH-CROPS AND COVER-CROPS
A catch-crop is one grown between the rows of another crop
for profit from the produce. A cover-crop is a temporary
90 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
crop grown, as the term was first used, to protect the soil, but
the word is now used to include green-manuring crops as well.
Catch-crops seldom have a place in most vineyards, but cover-
crops are often grown.
Catch-crops.
Catch-crops are not, as a rule, profitable in commercial
vineyards; they may bring temporary profit but in the long
run they are usually detrimental to the vines. It may pay and
the grape may not be injured in some localities, if such truck
crops as potatoes, beans, tomatoes and cabbage are grown
between the rows or even in the rows for the first year and
possibly the second. Land, to do duty by the two crops,
however, must be excellent and the care of both crops must
be of the best. Growing gooseberries, currants, any of the
brambles, or even strawberries, is a poor procedure unless the
vineyard is small, the land very valuable or other conditions
prevail which make intensive culture possible or necessary.
The objections to catch-crops in the vineyard are two: they
rob the vines of food and moisture and endanger them to injury
from tools in caring for the catch-crop.
Sometimes the grape itself is planted as a catch-crop in the
vineyard. That is, twice the number of vines required in a
row for the permanent vineyard are set with the expectation
of cutting out alternate vines when two or three crops have
been harvested and the vines begin to crowd. This practice is
preferable to interplanting with bush-fruits, yet there is not
much to commend it if the experience of those who have tried
it is taken as a guide. Too often the filler vines are left a year
too long with the result that the permanent vines are checked
in growth for several years following. The profits from the
fillers are never large, scarcely pay for the extra work, and if
the permanent vines are stunted, the filler must be put down
as a liability rather than as an asset.
THE VINEYARD AND ITS MANAGEMENT 91
Cover-crops.
In an experiment being conducted by the New York Agri-
cultural Experiment Station, grapes do not give a very appre-
ciable response to cover-crops in yield of fruit or growth of
vine! There seem to be no other experiments to confirm the
results at the New York Station, and grape-growers nowhere
have used cover-crops very generally for the betterment of their
vineyards. There is doubt, therefore, as to whether grapes
will respond profitably to the annual use of cover-crops in yield
of fruit, which, of course, is the ultimate test of the value of
cover-crops, but a test hard to apply unless the experiment
runs a great number of years.
Leaving out the doubtful value of cover-crops in increasing
the supply of plant-food and thereby producing an increase
in yield, there are at least three ways in which cover-crops
are valuable in the vineyard. Thus, it is patent to all who have
tried cover-crops in the vineyard that the land is in much better
tilth and more easily worked when some green crop is turned
under in fall or spring; it is not unreasonable to assume, though
it is impossible to secure reliable experimental data to confirm
the belief, that cover-crops protect the roots of grapes from
winter-killing; certainly it may be expected that a cover-
crop sowed in midsummer will cause grapes to mature their wood
earlier and more thoroughly so that the vines go into the winter in
better condition. The only objection to be raised against
cover-crops in the vineyard is that pickers, mostly women,
object to the cover-crop when wet with rain or dew and usually
choose to pick in vineyards having no such crop. This seem-
ingly insignificant factor often gives the grape-grower who
sows cover-crops much trouble in harvest time.
Several cover-crops may be planted in vineyards as clover,
1 For an account of this experiment, see Bul. 381 of the N. Y. Agr.
Exp. Sta., Geneva.
92 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
vetch, oats, barley, cow-horn turnip, rape, rye and buckwheat.
Combinations of these usually make the seed too costly or
the trouble of sowing too great. Yet some combinations of
a leguminous and non-leguminous crop would seem to make
the best green crop for the grape. Thus, a bushel of oats or
barley plus ten pounds of clover or twenty pounds of winter
vetch, a combination often used in orchards, should prove
satisfactory in the vineyard. Or, doubling the amount of
seed for each, these crops could be alternated, with a change
in the rotation every four or six years, with cow-horn turnip
or rape. Turnip and rape require at least three pounds of
seed to the acre.
The cover-crop is sown in midsummer, about the first of
August in northern latitudes, and should be plowed under in
the fall or early spring. Under no circumstances should the
green crop be permitted to stand in the vineyard late in the
spring to rob the vines of food and moisture. The weather
map must be watched at sowing time to make sure of a moist
seed-bed. Plate III illustrates two vineyards with well-grown
cover-crops.
TILLAGE
Grape-growers are not in the fog that befuddles growers
of tree-fruits in regard to tillage. He is a sloven, indeed, who
permits his vines to stand a season in unbroken ground, and
there are no growers who recommend sod or any of the modified
sod-mulches for the grape. Tillage is difficult in hilly regions
and the operation is often neglected in hillside vineyards, as
in the Central Lakes region of New York, but even here some
sort of tillage is universal. The skip of a single season in till-
ing stunts the vines, and two or three skips in successive seasons
ruin a vineyard. No one complains that grapes suffer from
over-tilling as one frequently hears of tree-fruits. There is no
tonic for the grape that compares with cultivation when the
THE VINEYARD AND ITS MANAGEMENT 93
leaves lack color and hang limp and the vine has an indefinable
air of depression; and there is nothing better than cultivation
to rouse latent vigor in a scorching summer, or when drought
lays heavy on the land.
Tillage tools.
The tools to be used in tilling grapes vary with the topography
of the vineyard, the kind of soil and the preferences of the
vineyardist. The best tool is the one with which the ground
can be well fitted at least expense. Good work in the vineyard
requires at least two plows, a single-horse and a two-horse
plow. The latter, except on very hilly land, should be a gang-
plow. For commercial vineyards of any considerable size,
several cultivators are necessary for different seasons and
conditions of the soil. Thus, every vineyard should have a
_spring-tooth and a dise harrow, one of the several types of
weeders, a one-horse and a sulky cultivator. If weeds abound,
it is necessary to have some cutting tool, or an attachment to
one of the cultivators, to slide over the ground and cut off large
weeds. Another indispensable tool in a large vineyard is a
one-horse grape-hoe, to supplement the work of which there
must be heavy hand-hoes. Very often the surface soil must
be pulverized, and a clod-crusher, roller or a float becomes
a necessity. A full complement of bright, sharp tools at the
command of the grape-grower goes far toward success in his
business.
Tillage methods.
There are several reliable guides indicating when the vine-
yard needs to be tilled. The vineyardist who is but a casual
observer of the relation of vineyard operations to the life events
and the welfare of his vines will take the crop of weeds as his
guide. It is, of course, necessary to keep down the weeds, but
the man who waits until weeds force him to till will make a
94 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
poor showing in his vineyard. The amount of moisture in
the soil is a better guide. The chief function of tillage is to
save moisture by checking evaporation and to put the soil
in such condition that its water-holding capacity is creased.
The physical condition of the land is another guide. ‘Tilling
when the soil needs pulverizing furnishes a greater feeding
surface for the roots. ‘
Tillage begins with plowing in early spring. Whether pro-
vided with a cover-crop to be turned under or hard and bare,
the land must be broken each spring with the plow. Plowing
is best done by running a single furrow with a one-horse plow
up to or away from the vines as occasion calls and then follow-
ing with a two-horse or a gang-plow. Some growers use a dise
harrow instead of the plow to break the land in the spring,
but this is a doubtful procedure in most vineyards and is im-
possible when a heavy green-crop covers the land. Tillage
with harrow, cultivator, weeder or roller then proceeds at such
intervals as conditions demand, seldom less than once a fort-
night, until time to sow the cover-crop in midsummer. About
the time grapes blossom, the grape-hoe should be used to level
down the furrow turned up to the vines in the spring plowing.
Tillage should always follow a heavy rain to prevent the forma-
tion of a soil crust, this being a time when he who tills quickly
{ills twice. The number of times a vineyard should be tilled
depends on the soil and the season. Ten times over with the
cultivator in one vineyard or season may not be as effective as
five times in another vineyard or another season. In some
regions, as in New York, the grower is so often at the mercy
of wet weather in early spring that the plowing is best done in
the fall, and spring operations must then open with harrowing
with some tool that will break the land thoroughly.
The depth to till is governed by the nature of the soil and
the season. Heavy soils need deep tilling; light soils, shallow
tilling; in wet weather, till deeply; in dry weather, lightly.
THE VINEYARD AND ITS MANAGEMENT 95
Grape roots are well down in the soil and there is little danger
of injuring them in deep tillage. The depth of plowing and
cultivating should be varied somewhat from season to season
to avoid the formation of a plow-sole. In some regions plow-
ing and cultivating may be made a means of combating insects
and fungi, and this regulates the depth of tillage. Thus, in
the Chautauqua grape-belt of western New York, the pupa of
the root-worm, a scourge of the grape in this region, is thrown
out and destroyed by the grape-hoe just as it is about ready
to emerge as an adult to lay its eggs on the vines. In all regions,
leaves and mummied grapes bearing countless myriads of spores
of the mildews, black-rot and other fungi are interned by the
plow and cannot scatter disease.
The time in the season to stop tillage depends on the locality,
the season and the variety. It is a good rule to cease cultiva-
tion a few weeks before the grapes attain full size and begin
to color, for by this time they will have weighted down the
vines so that fruit and foliage will be in the way of the cultivator.
In the North, cultivation ceases in the ordinary season about
the first of August, earlier the farther south. Rank-growing
sorts, as Concord or Clinton, do not need to be cultivated as
late as those of smaller growth and scantier foliage, as Delaware
or Diamond. The cover-crop seed is covered the last time over
with the cultivator. Plate IV shows a well-tilled vineyard of
Concords.
IRRIGATION
The grape, as a rule, withstands drought very well, several
species growing wild on the desert’s edge. Even in the semi-
arid regions of the far West, where other fruits must always
be irrigated, the grape often grows well without artificial water-
ing. Irrigation is practiced in vineyards in the United States
only on the Pacific slope and here the practice is not as general
as with other fruit crops. Whether the grape shall be grown
96 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
under irrigation or not is a local and often an individual ques-
tion answered with regard to several conditions; as the local
rainfall, the depth and character of the soil, the cost of water
and ease of irrigation. These conditions are all correlated and
make about the most complex and difficult problem the growers
of grapes in semi-arid regions have to solve. As long, however, . *
as the grape-grower can grow fairly vigorous vines and harvest
a fairly bountiful crop by natural rainfall, he should not irri-
gate; for, even though the crop offsets the cost, there are several
objections to growing grapes under irrigation. The vines are
subject to more diseases and physiological troubles; the fruit
is said to lack aroma and flavor; grapes grown on irrigated
land do not stand shipment well, the unduly inflated grapes
often bursting; wine-makers do not like irrigated grapes as
well as those from non-irrigated lands; and watery grapes
from irrigated lands make inferior raisins. It is maintained,
however, with a show of reason, that grapes suffer in irrigated
vineyards in the ways set forth only when the vines are over-
or improperly irrigated.
(ZX) oeavyad (2x) ALIeG — ‘IIA DLVIg
CHAPTER VI
FERTILIZERS FOR GRAPES
As regards fertilizers, the grape-grower has much to learn
and in learning he must approach the problem with humility
of mind. For in his experimenting, which is the best way to
learn, he will no sooner arrive at what seems to be a certain
conclusion, than another season’s results or the yields in an
adjoining vineyard will upset the findings of past seasons and
those obtained in other*places. Unfortunately, there is little
real knowledge to be obtained on the subject, for grape-growers
have not yet broken away from time-worn dictums in regard
to fertilizers and still follow recommendations drawn from work
with truck and field crops. This is excused by the fact that
there have been almost no comprehensive experiments in the
country with fertilizers for grapes.
No fallacies die harder than the pronouncements of chemists
a generation ago that fertilizing consists in putting in the soil
approximately that which the plants take out; and that the
chemical composition of the crop affords the necessary guide
to fertilizing. These two theories are the basis of nearly every
recommendation that can be found for the use of fertilizers in
growing crops. The facts applied to the grape, however, are
that the average tillable soil contains a hundred or a thousand
times more of the chemical constituents of plants than the
grape can possibly take from the soil; and many experiments
in supplying food to plants show that the chemical composi-
tion of the plant is not a safe guide to their fertilizer require-
H 97
98 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
ments. Later teachings in regard to the use of fertilizers are:
That the quantity of mineral food in a soil may be of far less
importance than the quantity of water, and that the cultivator
should make certain that there is sufficient moisture in his
land so that the mineral salts may be readily dissolved and
so become available as plant-food; that far too much im-
portance has been attached to putting chemicals in the soil
and too little to the physical condition of the soil, whereby
the work of bacteria and the solvent action of organic acids
may make available plant-food that without these agencies is
unavailable.
These brief and simple statements introduce to grape-growers
some of the problems with which they must deal in fertilizing
grapes, and show what a complex problem of chemistry, physics
and biology fertilizing the soil is; how difficult experimental
work in this field is; and how cautious workers must be in inter-
preting results of either experiment or experience. An account
of an experiment in fertilizing a vineyard may make even more
plain the difficulties in carrying on experiments in fertilizing
fruits and the caution that must be observed in drawing con-
clusions.
An EXPERIMENT IN FERTILIZING GRAPES
The New York Agricultural Experiment Station is experi-
menting with fertilizers for grapes at Fredonia, Chautauqua
County, the chief grape region in eastern America. The ex-
periment should be of interest to every grape-grower from
several points of view. It not only shows that there are many
and difficult problems in fertilizing grapes, but also the results
of the use of manure, commercial fertilizers and cover-crops in
a particular vineyard; it suggests the fertilizers to be used and
the methods of use; and it furnishes a plan for an experiment
by grape-growers who want to try such an experiment and
FERTILIZERS FOR GRAPES 99
draw their own conclusions. An account of the experiment
and the results for the first five years follows: !
Tests at Fredonia.
“In the vineyard at Fredonia eleven plats were laid out in a
section of the vineyard where inequalities of soil and other con-
ditions were slight or were. neutralized. Each plat included
three rows (about one-sixth of an acre) and was separated
from the adjoining plats by a ‘buffer’ row not under test.
One plat in the center of the section served as a check, and five
different fertilizer combinations were used on duplicate plats
at either side of the check. Plats 1 and 7 received lime and a
complete fertilizer with quick-acting and slow-acting nitrogen ;
Plats 2 and 8 received the complete fertilizer but no lime; on
Plats 3 and 9 potash was omitted from the complete fertilizer
combination; Plats 4 and 10 received no phosphorus; Plats
5 and 11, no nitrogen; and Plat 6 was the check. The materials
were applied at such rates that they provided for the first year
72 pounds of nitrogen per acre, 25 pounds of phosphorus and
59 pounds of potassium; and for each of the last four years
two-thirds as much nitrogen and phosphorus and eight-ninths
as much potassium. The lime was applied the first and fourth
years in quantity to make a ton to the acre annually. Cover-
crops were sown on all plats alike and were plowed under in
late April or early May of each year. These differed in suc-
cessive years, but included no legumes. The crops used were
rye, wheat, barley and cowhorn turnips separately and the
last two in combination.
“The cultivation differed only in thoroughness from that
generally used in the Belt, the aim being to maintain a good
dust mulch during the whole growing season. Pruning by
the Chautauqua System was done throughout by one man,
who pruned solely according to the vigor of the individual
1 Quoted from Bul. No. 381, N. Y. Agr. Exp. Sta.
100 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
vines and left four, two or three, or no fruiting canes as
appeared best. The vineyard was thoroughly sprayed, all
plats alike.
“Low winter temperatures, affecting immature wood and
buds caused by unfavorable weather of the previous season,
reduced yields materially during two of the five years, and
practically neutralized ‘any anticipated benefit from fertilizers.
Following the first of these low-crop years, came a season,
1911, in which favorable conditions, acting upon vines left
undiminished in vigor by the light crop of the previous
year resulted in heavy and quite uniform yields on all
the plats.
“The yields for the five years are shown in Table 1; and a
summary showing the average gains from each treatment is
given in Table II, with the average financial balance after de-
ducting the cost of fertilizer application from the increased
returns from the plats receiving them.
TaBLE ].— YIELD or Grapes (Tons PER ACRE) IN FERTILIZER
EXPERIMENTS
rt 1909 | 1910 | 1911 | 1912 | 1913 |,>Year,
Tons Tons Tons Tons Tons Tons
1 | Complete fertilizer ; lime | 4.48 | 2.10 | 5.37 | 3.46 | 2.14 | 3.51
2 | Complete fertilizer . .| 4.76 | 2.21 | 5.71 | 4.30 | 2.83 | 3.96
3 | Nitrogen and phosphorus] 5.17 | 2.14 | 5.61 | 4.00 | 2.25 | 3.83
4 | Nitrogen and potash .| 4.25 | 2.55 | 5.64 | 4.10 | 2.85 | 3.87
5 | Phosphorus and potash | 3.41 | 2.00 | 5.44 | 4.35 | 1.78 | 3.39
6.) ‘Cheek 2° 2g 2 2 l8tSSh 2 MON E5232; |) 3:60) | MEZA Bele
7 | Complete fertilizer ; lime | 4.69 | 2.38 | 5.62 | 4.80 | 3.04 | 4.10
8 | Complete fertilizer . .| 4.66 | 2.07 | 5.71 | 4.98 | 2.72 | 4.02
9 | Nitrogen and phosphorus} 4.99 | 2.04 | 5.35 | 4.89 | 2.61 | 3.97
10 | Nitrogen and potash . | 4.79 | 2.26 | 5.91 | 4.89 | 3.07 | 4.18
11 | Phosphorus and potash | 4.99 | 1.87 | 5.03 | 4.21 | 1.97 | 3.61
FERTILIZERS FOR GRAPES 101
TaBLE II. — AVERAGE INCREASE IN GRAPE YIELDS AND AVERAGE
FINANCIAL GAIN FROM FrRTILIZER APPLICATIONS
N = nitrogen, P = phosphorus, K = potassium, Ca = lime.
Gains in tons per acre.
Brae Ln, By ey NP. N, K. P, K.
. Tons } Tons ; Tons Tons Tons
First plat of pair , a.01 3.96 3.83 Doc 3.39
Second plat of pair . 4.10 4.02 3.97 4.18 3.61
AGOLAOG” ot. 3.80 3.97 3.90 4.02 3.50
Cheek plat SEW 3.12 yall ole 3.12 3.12
Average gain es 68 85 78 90 .o8
Average financial gain) $5.82 | $13.84 | $14.05 | $18.54 $6.99
From this last table the benefit from nitrogen appears quite
evident since every combination in which it appears gives a
substantial gain over the one from which it is absent. Phos.
phorus and potassium without the nitrogen, lead to only a
slight increase over the check; and lime appears to be of no
benefit. Financially, the complete fertilizer and lime com-
bination, the nitrogen and phosphorus combination and the
phosphorus and potassium combination failed to pay their cost
in five of the ten comparisons; the complete fertilizer was used
at a loss four times out of ten; and the nitrogen and potas-
sium combination three times out of ten. Lime had no
appreciable effect on either vines or fruit.
“No effect of the fertilizers on the fruit itself, aside from
yield, was shown for the first three years; but in 1912, and even
more markedly in 1913, the fruit from the plats on which
nitrogen had been used was superior in compactness of cluster,
size of cluster and size of berry. In 1912 also, when early ripen-
ing was a decided advantage, the fruit on the nitrogen plats
matured earlier than that on the check plats. In 1913 the
102 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
favorable ripening season and the smaller crop tended to
equalize the time of ripening on all plats. The grapes on the
phosphorus-potassium plats were better in quality than those
in the check plats but not as good as those on the plats where
nitrogen was used.
“Other indexes also show plainly the benefit from nitrogen
in this vineyard; for size and weight of leaf, weight of wood
produced and number of fruiting canes left on the vines were
all greater where fertilizers, and particularly nitrogen, had been
used. The three-year averages (1911-1913) of the measure-
ments for these characteristics are shown in Table III:
Tasie III]. — Comparative Propuction or LEAVES, Woop AND
Fruitinc CANES ON GRAPE VINES DIFFERENTLY FERTILIZED
(Averages for three years.)
FERTILIZER APPLICATION Lear WeicutT!|Woop Prunep? oe
Grams. Lbs.
Complete fertilizer; lime . . 1,033 1,295 2,468
Complete fertilizer . .. . 1,010 1,367 2,609
Nitrogen and phosphorus . . 1,047 1,272 2,585
Nitrogen and potassium Sas 1,069 1,401 2,646
Phosphorus and potassium : 964 1,086 2,326
Chéeeke sit ee eee 930 915 2,110
Codperative experiments.
“Tn order to secure informationas to the behavior of fertilizers
on the different soils of the Grape Belt, co6perative tests were
carried on in six vineyards owned, respectively, by S. S. Gran-
din, Westfield; Hon. C. M. Hamilton, State Line; James Lee,
Brocton; H.S. Miner, Dunkirk; Miss Frances Jennings, Sil-
1 Hach weight is of 300 green leaves, 5 from each of 60 vines. The
first leaf beyond the last cluster was selected.
2 Amount to the acre of wood pruned in fall.
3’ Number to the acre.
FERTILIZERS FOR GRAPES 103
ver Creek; and J. T. Barnes, Prospect Station. The soil in
these vineyards included gravelly loam, shale loam and clay
loam, all in the Dunkirk series, and the experiments covered
from two to two and a half acres in three cases and about five
acres in each of the other vineyards. ‘The work continued four
years in all but one of the experiments, which it was necessary
to end after the second year.
“The general plan of the tests was much like that at Fre-
donia in most of the vineyards, with the additions of plats for
stable manure and for leguminous and non-leguminous cover
crops with and without lime. From two to six check plats
were left for comparison in each vineyard. As already stated
the results were often inconsistent in duplicate plats in the
same vineyard, and if one test appeared to point definitely in a
certain direction, the indication would be negatived by results
in other vineyards. In these experiments the yield of fruit
was the only index to the effect of treatments as it was not possi-
ble to weigh leaves or pruned wood, or to count the canes left.
“Nitrogen and potassium in combination, which gave the
largest gains and greatest profit in the Station vineyard at
Fredonia, showed a 13 per ct. increase in yield on one plat in
the Jennings vineyard and a 9 per ct. decrease on the other;
in the Miner vineyard this combination apparently resulted in
a 25 per ct. increase; in the Lee vineyard in a 2% per ct. loss;
in the Hamilton vineyard a 17 per ct. gain; and in the Grandin
vineyard neither gain nor loss. In only two of the five vine-
yards in which this combination was tested was the gain great
enough to pay the cost of the fertilizer applied. Similar dis-
crepancies, or absence of profitable gain, mark the use of the
other fertilizer combinations.
“Even stable manure, the standby of the farmer and fruit-
grower, when applied at the rate of five tons per acre each
spring, and plowed in, did not, on the average, pay for itself.
Indeed, there were few instances among the 60 comparisons
104 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
possible, in which more than a very moderate profit could be
credited to manure. The average increase in yield following
the application of manure alone was less than a quarter of a
ton of grapes to the acre; while the use of lime with the manure
increased the gain to one-third of a ton per acre. The ton of
lime to the acre annually would not be paid for by the gain of
175 pounds of grapes. Cover-crops were used in five of the
s1x coOperative experiments and proved even less adapted to
increasing crop yields than did the manure. There was no ap-
preciable gain, on the average, from the use of mammoth clover ;
indeed, a slight loss must be recorded for the clover except upon
the plats which were also limed, and even with the lime the
average yields on check plats and mammoth clover plats
differed by only one one-hundredth of a ton. Wheat or barley
with cowhorn turnips made a slightly better showing, as the
plats on which these crops were turned under, without lime,
averaged about one-twentieth of a ton to the acre better than
the checks. With these non-legumes, lime was apparently a
detriment, as the plants with the lime yielded a tenth of a ton
less, on the average, than those without it.”
Practical lessons from the Fredonia experiment.
From this experiment it becomes clear that the use of fer-
tilizers in a vineyard is a local problem. General advice is of
little value. It is evident also that the fertilization of vine-
yards is so involved with other factors that only carefully
planned and long continued work will give reliable information
as to the needs of vines. Indeed, field experiments even in
carefully selected vineyards, as the codperative experiments
show, may be so contradictory and misleading as to be worse
than useless, if deductions are made from the results of a few
seasons. ‘The experiment, however, has brought forth informa-
tion about fertilizing vineyards that ought to be most helpful
to grape-growers. ‘Thus, the results suggest :
FERTILIZERS FOR GRAPES 105
Only vineyards in good condition respond to fertilizers.
It is usually waste to make applications of fertilizers in
poorly drained vineyards, in such as suffer from winter cold
or spring frosts, where insect pests are epidemic and uncon-
trolled or where good care is lacking. The experiments fur-
nish several examples of inertness, ineffectiveness or failure to
produce profit when the fertilizers were applied under any of
the conditions named. They emphasize the importance of pay-
ing attention to all of the factors on which plant growth is de-
pendent. Moisture, soil temperature, aération, the texture of
the soil, freedom from pests, cold and frosts, as well as the
supply of food may limit the yield of grapes.
A vineyard soil may have a one-sided wear.
It is certain in some of the experiments and strongly indi-
cated in others that the soil is having a one-sided wear — that
only one or a yery few of the elements of fertility are lacking.
The element most frequently lacking is nitrogen. Exception
will probably be found in very light sands or gravels which
are often deficient in potash and the phosphates; or on soils
so shallow or of such mechanical texture that the root range of
the vine is limited; or in soils so wet or so dry as to limit the
root range or prevent biological activities. These exceptions
mean, as a rule, that the soils possessing the unfavorable qual-
ities are unfitted for grape-growing. The grape-grower should
try to discover which of the fertilizing elements his soil lacks
and not waste by using elements not needed.
Grape soils are often uneven.
The marked unevenness of the soil in the seven vineyards
in which these experiments were carried on, as indicated by the
crops and the effects of the fertilizers, furnishes food for thought
to grape-growers. Maximum profits cannot be approached
106 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
in vineyards in which the soil is as uneven as in these, which
were in every case selected because there was an appearance
of uniformity. A problem before grape-growers is to make
uniform all conditions in their vineyards, and the vines must
be kept free from pests if fertilizers are to be profitably used.
How a grape-grower may know when his vines need fertilizers.
A grape-grower may assume that his vines do not need fer-
tilizers if they are vigorous and making a fair annual growth.
When the vineyard is found to be failing in vigor, the first step
to be taken is to make sure that the drainage is good ; the second
step, to control insect and fungous pests; the third, to give
tillage and good care; and the fourth step is to apply fertilizers
if they be found necessary. Few vineyards will be found to
require a complete fertilizer. What the special requirements
of a vineyard are can be ascertained only by experiment and
are probably not ascertainable by analyses of the soil. This
experiment furnishes suggestions as to how the grape-grower
may test the value of fertilizers in his own vineyard.
Applying fertilizers.
When it is certain that vines need fertilization, and what is
wanted is known, the fertilizers should be put on in the spring
and be worked in by the spring cultivation. Stable manure
should be plowed under. Grape roots forage throughout the
whole top layer of soil so that the land should be covered with
the fertilizer, whether chemical or barnyard manure. Applica-
tions of commercial fertilizers are generally spread broadcast,
though it is better to drill them in if the foliage is out on the
vines and thus avoid possible injury to tender foliage. Com-
mercial fertilizers should be mixed thoroughly and in a finely
divided state. In leachy soils, nitrate of soda ought not to be
applied too early in the season, as it will quickly wash down
out of reach of the grape roots.
i a
Puate VIII. — Brighton (xX #).
FERTILIZERS FOR GRAPES 107
Over-rich soils.
Some soils are too rich for the grape. On these the growth is
over-luxuriant, the wood does not mature in the autumn, fruit-
buds do not form and the fruit is poor in quality. Certain
varieties can stand a richer soil than others. Over-richness is
a trouble that may cure itself as the vines come in full bearing
and make greater demands on the soil for food. It is well,
however, on a soil that is suspected of being too rich or so
proved by the behavior of the vines, to provide an extra wire
on the trellis, to prune little and thus take care of the rampant
growth. Some soils, however, and this is often the case, are
so rich that the grape cannot be made to thrive in them; the
vines waste their substance in riotous living, producing luxuri-
ant foliage and lusty wood but little or no fruit.
CHAPTER VII
PRUNING THE GRAPE IN EASTERN AMERICA
THE inexperienced look on pruning as a difficult operation
in grape-growing. But once a few fundamentals are grasped,
grape-pruning is not difficult. There is much less perplexity
in pruning the grape than in pruning tree-fruits. Pruning fol-
lows accepted patterns in every grape region, and when the
pattern is learned the difficulties are easily overcome. The
inexperienced are confused by the array of “principles,”
“types,” “methods,” “systems” and the many technical
terms that enter into discussions of grape-pruning. Some of
the technicalities come from European practices, and others
originated in the infancy of grape-growing in this country when
there was great diversity in pruning. Divested of much that
is but jargon, an inexperienced man can easily learn in a few
lessons, from word of mouth or printed page, how to prune
grapes.
The simplicity of pruning has led to slighting the work in
commercial vineyards, by too often trusting it to unskilled
hands. Then, too, in this age of power-propelled tools, pride
in hand labor has been left behind. and few grape-growers
now take time and trouble to become expert in pruning.
Simple as the work may seem to those long accustomed
to it, he who wants to put into his pruning painstaking intel-
ligence and to taste the joy of a task well done finds in this
108
PRUNING THE GRAPE IN EASTERN AMERICA 109
vineyard operation an ample field for pleasure and for the de-
velopment of greater profits. The price to be paid by those
who would thus attempt perfection in pruning the vine is
forward vision, the mechanic’s eye, the gardener’s touch,
patience, and pride in handicraft.
Simple as pruning is, the pruner soon learns that it is an art
in which perfection is better known in mind than followed in
deed. The theory is easy but there are some stumbling blocks
to make its consummation difficult. It is an art in which
rules do not suffice, for no two vineyards can be pruned alike
in amount or method, and every grape-grower finds his vine-
yard a proper field for the gratification of his taste in pruning.
Happily, however, enlightened theory and sound practice are
in perfect accord in grape-pruning, so that specific advice is
well founded on governing principles.
One cannot, of course, learn to prune unless he understands
the habit of the grape-vine and is familiar with the terms ap-
plied to the different parts of the vine. As a preliminary to
this chapter, therefore, knowledge of Chapter XVII, in which
the structure of the grape-vine is discussed, is necessary. The
next step is to distinguish between pruning and training.
PRUNING AND TRAINING DISTINGUISHED =
The grape is pruned to increase in various ways the economic
value of the plant by increasing the quantity and value of the
crop. This is pruning proper. Or grapes are pruned to make
well-proportioned plants with the parts so disposed that the
vines are to the highest degree manageable in the vineyard.
This is training. To repeat, the grape-plant is pruned to regu-
late the crop; it is trained to regulate the vine. Grape-grow-
ers usually speak of both operations as “pruning,” but it is
better to keep in mind the two conceptions. The distinctions
between pruning and training must be made more apparent by
110 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
setting forth in greater detail the results attained by the two
operations.
Results attained in pruning to regulate the crop.
Proper pruning of vines in their first year in the vineyard,
which, as we have seen, consists of cutting the young plants
back severely, brings the vines in productive bearing a year or
two years earlier than they would have borne had the pruning
been neglected. This early pruning, since it is done with an eye
to the vigor of each vine, insures greater uniformity in the growth
and productiveness of the vineyard. Uniformity thus brought
about is important not only for the time being, but for the fu-
ture development of the vines, since weak vines, if unpruned,
are stunted and may require years to overtake more vigorous
vines in the vineyard.
The quality of the crop may be regulated by pruning. When
vines bear too heavily, the grapes are small, and wine-makers
have found that they seldom develop sugar and flavor as do
grapes on vines not overbearing. Grapes on vines too heavily
laden seldom ripen or color well. Not only are the grapes on
poorly pruned and unpruned vines poor in quality but the
grapes on such vines are usually not well distributed and there-
fore ripen and color unevenly. The results just mentioned
follow because the bunches in a poorly distributed crop receive
varying amounts of light and heat depending on the distance
from the ground, the distance from the trunk and on the amount
of shade.
Pruning may be used to regulate the quantity of grapes
borne in a vineyard and so be made somewhat helpful in pre-
venting alternate bearing. Abnormally large crops are usually
followed by partial crop failure and biennial bearing some-
times sets in, but the large crop may be reduced by pruning
and the evil consequences wholly or partly avoided. It fol-
lows that pruning must depend much on the vigor of the vine;
PRUNING THE GRAPE IN EASTERN AMERICA 11
for a weak vine may be so pruned as to cause it to overbear ;
and, on the other hand, a vigorous vine pruned in the same way
might not bear at all.
Results attained in pruning to regulate the vine.
It is necessary to regulate the shape of the vine by training
so that tilling, spraying, pruning and harvesting can be easily
performed and the crop be kept off the ground. The cost of
production is always less in a well-pruned vineyard because all
vineyard operations are more easily carried out.
The life of a vineyard is lengthened when the vines are well
trained, because when the parts of a vine are properly disposed
on trellis or stake the plants are less often injured in vineyard
operations. Moreover, not infrequently vines die from over-
production and consequent breaking of canes or trunks which
might have been prevented by pruning to shape the vine.
Suckers and water-sprouts are less common on well-trained
vines. It is necessary, too, by training to keep the bunches
away from trunk, canes and other bunches and so prevent
injury to the grapes.
Lastly, fashion, taste or a more or less abnormal use of the
grapes, may prescribe the form in which a vine is trained.
Fashion and taste run from very simple or natural styles to
exceedingly complex, formal ones, depending, often, on the
variety, the environment or other condition, but just as often
on the whim of the grape-grower. The grape is a favorite orna-
mental for fences, arbors and to cover buildings; for all of
these purposes the vines must be trained as occasion calls.
SoME PRINCIPLES OF PRUNING
Leaving the shaping of the plant out of consideration and
having in mind pruning proper, all efforts in pruning are di-
rected toward two objects: (1) The production of leafy shoots
112 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
to increase the vigor of the plant. (2) The promotion of the
formation of fruit-buds. The first, in common parlance, is
pruning for wood; the second, pruning for fruit.
Pruning for wood.
Some grapes, In common with varieties of all fruits, produce
excessive crops of fruit so that the plants exhaust themselves,
to their permanent injury and to the detriment of the crop.
Something must be done to restore and increase vegetative
vigor. The most natural procedure is to lessen the struggle for
existence among the parts of the plant. The richer and the
more abundant the supply of the food solution, the greater
the vegetative activity, the larger the leaves and the larger and
stouter the internodes. Obviously, the supply of food solu-
tion for each bud may be increased by decreasing the number of
buds. The weaker the plants, therefore, the more the vine
should be cut. The severe pruning in the first two years of the
vine’s existence is an example of pruning for wood. The vine
is pruned for wood in the resting period between the fall of leaf
and the swelling of buds the following spring.
Pruning for fruit.
Growers of all fruits soon learn that excessive vegetative
' vigor is not usually accompanied by fruitfulness. Too great
vigor is indicated by long, leafy, unbranching shoots. Some
fruit-growers go so far as to say that fruitfulness is inversely
proportionate to vegetative vigor. There are several methods
of diminishing the vigor of the vine; as, withholding water
and fertilizers, stopping tillage, the method of training and by
pruning. Pruning is used to decrease the vigor of the vine,
in theory at least, for the practice is not always so successful,
by pruning the roots or by summer-pruning the shoots.
Root-pruning the grape at intervals of several years is a
regular practice with some varieties in warm countries, Eu-
PRUNING THE GRAPE IN EASTERN AMERICA 113
rope more especially, but is seldom or never practiced in Amer-
ica except when planting and when roots arise from the cion
above the union of stock and cion.
Summer-pruning to induce fruitfulness consists In removing
new shoots with newly developed leaves. These young shoots
have been developed from reserve material stored up the pre-
ceding season, and until they are so far developed that they can
perform the functions of leaves they are to be counted as para-
sites. When, therefore, these shoots are pruned or pinched
away, the plant is robbed of the material used by the lusty shoot
which up to this time has given nothing in return. The vigor
of the plant is thus checked and fruitfulness increased. Sum-
mer-pruning may become harmful if delayed too long. The
time to prune Is past with the grape when the leaves have passed
from the light green color of new growth to the dark green of
mature leaves.
Fruit-bearing may be augmented by bending, twisting or
ringing the canes, since all of these operations diminish vegeta-
tive vigor. Ringing is the only one of these methods in general
use, and this only for some special variety or special purpose,
and usually with the result that the vigor of the vine is dimin-
ished too much for the good of the plant. Ringing is discussed
more fully in Chapter XVI.
The manner of fruit-bearing in the grape.
Before attempting to prune, the pruner must understand
precisely how the grape bears its crop. The fruit is borne near
the base of the shoots of the current season, and the shoots are
borne on the wood of the previous year’s growth coming from
a dormant bud. Here is manifested one of Nature’s energy-
saving devices, shoot, leaves, flowers and fruit spring in a short
season from a single bud. In the light of this fact, pruning
should be looked on as a simple problem to be solved mathe-
matically and not as a puzzle to be untangled, as so many re-
I
114 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
gard it. For an example, a problem in pruning is here stated
and solved.
A thrifty grape-vine should yield, let us say, fifteen pounds
of grapes, a fair average for the mainstay varieties. Each bunch
will weigh from a quarter to a half pound. To produce fifteen
pounds on a vine, therefore, will require from thirty to sixty
bunches. As each shoot will bear two or three bunches, from
fifteen to thirty buds must be left on the canes of the precedirg
year. These buds are selected in pruning on one or more canes
distributed on one or two main stems in such manner as the
pruner may choose, but usually in accordance with one or
another of several well-developed methods of training. Pru i-
ing, then, consists in calculating the number of bunches ad
buds necessary and removing the remainder. In essere
pruning is thinning.
Horizontal versus perpendicular canes.
An old dictum of viticulture is that the nearer the growing
parts of the vine approach the perpendicular, the more vigorous
the parts. The terminal buds, as every grape-grower knows,
grow very rapidly and probably absorb, unless checked, more
than their share of the energy of the vine. This tendency can
be checked somewhat by removing the terminal buds, which
also helps to keep the plants within manageable limits, but is
better controlled by training the canes to horizontal positions.
Grape canes are tied horizontally to wires to make the vines
more manageable and to reduce their vigorand so induce fruitful-
ness; they are trained vertically to increase the vigor of the vine.
Winter-pruning.
Winter-pruning of the vineyard may be done at any time from
the dropping of the leaves in the autumn to the swelling of the
buds in the spring. The sap begins to circulate actively in the
grape early in the spring, even to the extremities of the vine,
Puiate IX. — Campbell Early (x).
PRUNING THE GRAPE IN EASTERN AMERICA 115
and most grape-growers believe this sap to be a “vital stream”
and that, if the vine is pruned during its flow, the plant will
bleed to death. The vine, however, is at this season of so drop-
sical a constitution that the loss of sap is better denominated
“weeping” than “bleeding.” It is doubtful whether serious
injury results from pruning after the sap begins to flow, but it
is a safe practice to prune earlier and the work is certainly
pleasanter. The vine should not be pruned when the wood is
frozen, since at this time the canes are brittle and easily broken
in handling. On the other hand, it is well to delay pruning in
northern climates until after a heavy freeze in the autumn, to
winterkill and wither immature wood so that it can be re-
moved in pruning.
Summer-pruning.
There are three kinds of summer-pruning, the removal of
superfluous shoots, heading-in canes to keep the vines in man-
ageable limits and the pruning to induce fruitfulness discussed
on a foregoing page, which need not have further consideration.
It is very essential that the grower keep these three purposes
in mind, especially as there is much dispute as to the necessity
of two of these operations.
All agree that the vine usually bears superfluous shoots that
should be removed. These are such as spring from small,
weak buds or from buds on the arms and trunk of the vine.
These shoots are useless, devitalize the vine, and hinder vine-
yard operations. A good practice is to rub off the buds from
which these shoots grow as they are detected, but in most vine-
yards the vines must be gone over from time to time as the
shoots appear. Still another kind of superfluous shoots, which
ought to be removed as they appear, are those which grow from
the base of the season’s shoots, the so-called secondary or axil-
lary shoots. These are usually “broken out’’ at the time the
shoots from weak buds are removed.
116 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
While there is doubt as to the value of heading-back the
vine in the summer for the sole purpose of inducing fruitful-
ness, there can be no doubt that it is desirable for the purpose
of keeping some varieties within bounds. Heading-back is
not now the major operation it once was, the need of severe
cutting being obviated by putting the vines farther apart, by
training high on three or even four wires and by adopting one
of the drooping systems of training. The objections to head-
ing-back in the summer are that it often unduly weakens the
vines, that it may induce a growth of laterals which thicken
the vines too much, and that it delays the maturing of the
wood. These bad effects, however, can be overcome by prun-
ing lightly and doing the work so late in the season that lateral
growths will not start. Most vineyardists who keep their
plantations up find it necessary to head back more or less, de-
pending on the season and the variety. The work is usually
done when the over-luxuriant shoots begin to touch the ground.
The shoots are then topped off with a sickle, corn-cutter or
similar tool.
RENEWING FrRuITING Woop
There are two ways of renewing the fruiting wood on a
grape-vine, by canes and from spurs. The manner of renew-
ing refers to pruning and not to training, for either can be used
in any method of training.
Cane renewals.
Renewal by canes is made each year by taking one or more
canes, cut to the desired number of buds, to supply bearing
shoots. By this method the most of the bearing wood is re-
moved each year, new canes taking the place of the old. These
renewal canes may be taken either from the head of the vine or
from the ground, though the latter is little used except where
PRUNING THE GRAPE IN EASTERN AMERICA 117
vines must be laid down for winter protection. Canes may be
renewed indefinitely, if care is exercised in keeping the stubs
short, without enlarging the head from which the canes are
taken out of proportion to the size of the trunk. Renewing
by canes is a more common method than renewal by spurs,
as will be found in the discussion of methods of training.
Spur renewal.
In renewing by spurs, a permanent arm is established to
right and left on the canes. Shoots on this arm are not permit-
ted to remain as canes but are cut back to spurs in the dor-
mant pruning. ‘Two buds are left at this pruning, both of which
will produce bearing shoots; the lower one, however, is not
suffered to do so but is kept to furnish the spur for the next
season. The shoot from the upper bud is cut away entirely.
When this process is
carried on from year to
year, the spurs become
longer and longer until
they become unwieldy.
Occasionally, however,
happy chance permits
the selection of a shoot
on the old wood for a
new spur. Failing in
this, a new arm must Fic. 13. Vine ready for pruning; 7, the
be laid down and the stem; g, arms; d, canes; s, shoots; |, spurs.
: The faint lines near the bases of the canes in-
spurring goes on as be- dicate the points where they should be pruned
fore. The objections off in the winter, leaving spurs for the produc-
tion of shoots the following season.
to renewing by spurs
are: it is often difficult to replace spurs with new wood, and
the bearing portion of the vine gets farther and farther from
the trunk. For these reasons, spur-renewing is generally in
disfavor with commercial grape-growers, though it is still used
118 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
in one or two prominent methods of training, as will be dis-
covered in this discussion. Figure 13 shows a vine ready for
pruning.
Tue Work oF PRUNING
The pruner may take his choice between several styles of
hand pruning-shears with which to do his work. The knife
is seldom used except in summer-pruning, and here, more
often, the shoots are broken out or pinched out. In winter-
pruning, the cane is cut an inch or thereabout beyond the
last bud it is desired to leave; otherwise the bud may die from
the drying out of the cane. The canes are usually allowed to
remain tied to the wires until the pruning is done, though
growers who use the Kniffin method of training may cut them
loose before they prune. Two men working together do the
work of pruning best. The more skilled of the two severs
the wood from the bearing vine, leaving just the number of
buds desired for the next season’s crop. The less skilled man
cuts tendrils and severs the cut canes from each other so that
the prunings may be moved from the vineyard without trouble
by the “stripper.”
Not the least of the tasks of pruning is “stripping” the
brush and getting it out of the vineyard. The prunings cling
to the trellis with considerable tenacity and must be pulled
loose with a peculiar jerk, learned by practice, and placed on
the ground between the rows. Stripping is done, usually by
cheap labor, at any time after the pruning until spring, but
must not be delayed until growth starts or the young buds may
suffer as the cut wood is torn from the trellis. The brush is
hauled to the end of the row by hand or by horse-power applied
to any one of a dozen devices used in the several grape regions.
One of the best is the device in common use in the Chautauqua
vineyards of western New York. A pole, twelve feet long, four
inches in diameter at the butt and two at the top, is bored with
PRUNING THE GRAPE IN EASTERN AMERICA 119
an inch hole four feet from the butt. A horse is hitched to
this pole by a rope drawn through the hole, and the pole, butt
to the ground, is then
pulled between rows,
the small end being
held in the right hand.
The pole, when skill-
fully used, collects
the brush, which is
dumped at the end
of the row by letting the small end fly over towards the horse.
The “ go-devil,” shown in Fig. 14, is another common device
for collecting prunings.
Fic. 14. A ‘‘go-devil’’ for collecting prunings.
THe TRELLIS
The trellis is a considerable item in the grape-grower’s bud-
get, since it must be renewed every fifteen years or thereabouts.
Wires are strung in the North at the end of the second season
after planting, but in the South the growth is often so great
that the wires must be put up at the end of the first season.
Trellises are of the same general style for commercial vineyards ;
namely, two or three wires tautly stretched on firmly set posts.
Occasionally slat trellises are put up in gardens but these are
not to be recommended for any but ornamental purposes.
Posts.
Strong, durable posts of chestnut, locust, cedar, oak or reén-
forced cement are placed at such distance apart that two or
three vines can be set between each two posts. The distance
apart depends on the distance between vines, although the
tendency now is to have three vines between two posts. The
posts are from six to eight feet in length, the heaviest being
used as end posts. In hard stony soils it may be necessary to
120 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
set the end posts with a spade, but usually sharpened posts can
be driven into holes made with a crow-bar. In driving, the
operator stands on a wagon hauled by a horse and uses a ten- or
twelve-pound maul. The posts are driven to a depth of eight-
een or twenty-four inches for the end posts. However set,
the posts must stand firm to hold the load of vines and fruit.
The end posts must be braced. As good a brace as any is made
yall
oe
beara
. =
a TS
A be y \ \: ‘ : “
a hA\, h (7 Aa Ao Tn
de ‘\\ \| Y | ff Niu Wid, 4
“tl
Ural
SY Ue
Fic, 15. A trellis and a common method of bracing end posts.
from a four-by-four timber, notched to fit the post halfway up
from the ground, and extending obliquely to the ground, where
it is held by a four-by-four stake. A two-wire trellis and a
common method of bracing end posts are shown in Fig. 15.
The posts on hillsides must lean slightly up-hill, otherwise
they will almost certainly sooner or later tilt down the
slope. The posts are usually permitted to stand a little higher
at first than necessary so that they may be driven down
should occasion call; driving is usually done in the early
spring.
PRUNING THE GRAPE IN EASTERN AMERICA 121
Wire for the trellis.
Four sizes of wire are in common use for vineyard trellises ;
nos. 9, 10, 11 and 12. Number 9, the heaviest, is often used
for the top wire with lighter wires lower. The following figures
show the length of wire in a ton:
No. 9, 34,483 ft. Wo. 11, 52,352) ft.
No. 10, 41,408 ft. No. 12, 68,493 ft.
From these figures the number of pounds required to the acre
is easily calculated. Common annealed wire makes a durable
trellis, but many growers prefer the more durable galvanized
wire, the cost of which is slightly greater. The wires are
fastened to the end posts by winding once around the post,
and then each wire is firmly looped about itself; they are se-
cured to the intervening posts by ordinary fence staples so
driven that the wire cannot pull through of its own weight but
with space enough to permit tightening from season to season.
The size and length of the staples depend on whether the posts
are hard or soft wood. The longest and largest staples are
used with soft woods, as cedar or chestnut. An acre requires
from nine to twelve pounds of staples. The wires should be
placed on the windward sides of posts and on the up-hill side in
hillside vineyards. The distance between wires depends on
the method of pruning.
The wires must be stretched taut on the posts, for which
purpose any one of a half-dozen good wire stretchers may be
purchased at hardware stores. Some growers loosen the wires
after harvest to allow for the contraction in cold weather and
others use some one of several devices to relieve the strain.
Most growers, however, find it necessary to go over the vine-
yard each spring to drive down loosened posts and stretch
sagging wires, and so take no precautions to release wires in
the fall. All agree that the wires must be kept tight during
122 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
the growing season to protect buds, foliage and fruit from
being injured from whipping.
Tying.
The canes are tied to the trellis in early spring, and under
most systems of pruning the growing shoots are tied in the
summer. This work is done by cheap men, women, boys and
girls. A great variety of material is used to make the tie, as
raffia, wooltwine, willow, inner bark of the linden or bass-
wood, green rye straw, corn husks, carpet-rags and wire. The
same materials are not usually employed for both canes and
shoots, since the canes are tied firmly to hold them steady and
the work is done early before there is danger of breaking swell-
ing buds, while the summer shoots are tied to hold for a shorter
time and more loosely to permit growth in diameter. Tying
usually follows accepted patterns in one region but varies
greatly in different regions. There is a knack to be learned in
the use of each one of the materials named, but with none is it
difficult, and an ingenious person can easily contrive a tie of
his own to suit fancy or conditions.
Ys
Piate X.— Clinton (xX).
ee
y
Bo ae te:
=
:
’
CHAPTER VIII
METHODS OF TRAINING GRAPES IN EASTERN
AMERICA
THE grape-grower takes great liberties with Nature in train-
ing his plants. No other fruit is so completely transformed
by the grower’s art from its natural habit of growth. Happily,
the grape endures cutting well, and the pruner may rest as-
sured that he may work his will in pruning his vines, following
‘to his heart’s desire a favorite method with little fear of seri-
ously injuring his vines., Because of its accommodation to the
desires of man in the disposition of the vine, there are many
methods of training the grape; there being in the commercial
vineyards of eastern America a dozen or more. However,
the differences and similarities are so marked that the several
methods fall into a simple classification which makes con-
spicuous their chief features. Thus, all of the methods fall
under two chief heads: (1) The disposition of shoots; (2) the
disposition of canes.
The disposition of shoots.
Bearing shoots are disposed of in three ways in training
grapes; shoots upright, shoots drooping, and shoots hori-
zontal. The terms explain themselves, but the three methods
need amplification since their adoption is not optional with
growers but depends on several circumstances.
Shoots are trained upright in several methods in which two
or more arms or canes are laid to right and left, sometimes
123
124 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
horizontally, sometimes obliquely along or across horizontal
wires. As the shoots grow upward, they are tied to wires
above. The upright methods are supposed to distribute the
bearing wood more evenly on the vines and to insure greater
uniformity in the fruit. In the upright methods, also, the canes
and arms are let nearer the ground, which is thought to be
an advantage in small, weak or slow-growing varieties. Dela-
ware, Catawba, Iona and Diana are examples of varieties
thought to grow best when trained to one of the upright
methods.
In the several methods in which the shoots droop, however
the canes may be disposed, the shoots are not tied but are
allowed to droop at will. These methods are comparatively
new but are being rapidly adopted because of several marked
advantages. Usually one less wire can be used in a drooping
method than in an upright one; since the shoots are not tied,
much labor is saved in summer tying; the ground can be
tilled with less danger to the vines; and there is less sun-
scalding of the fruit, since the pendant foliage protects the
clusters. Grape-growers generally agree that strong-growing
varieties like Concord, Niagara, Brighton, Diamond and most
of the hybrids between European grapes and native species
grow best when the shoots droop.
Shoots are trained horizontally in but one recognized method,
the Hudson Horizontal, to be described in detail later. Since
this method is all but obsolete,.there is still less reason for dis-
cussing it here, the expressive name sufficing for present pur-
poses.
Disposition of canes.
There are many recognized methods of disposing of the canes
in training the grape. The chief of these are discussed in the
pages that follow, their names being set down for the present
in the classification that follows.
TRAINING GRAPES IN EASTERN AMERICA 125
CLASSIFICATION OF METHODS OF TRAINING THE
GRAPE IN EASTERN AMERICA
I. Shoots upright :
1. Chautauqua Arm.
2. Keuka High Renewal.
3. Fan.
Il. Shoots drooping:
1. Single-stem, Four-cane Kniffin.
Two-stem, Four-cane Kniffin.
Umbrella Kniffin.
Y-stem Kniffin.
Munson.
III. Shoots horizontal :
1. Hudson Horizontal.
ib hs
I. Shoots wpright
Systematic training of the grape in America began toward
the middle of the nineteenth century with a method in which
the shoots were trained upright from two permanent hori-
zontal arms. ‘These arms are laid to right and left on a low
wire and bear more or less permanent spurs, from each of which
two shoots are produced each season to bear the crop. The
number of spurs left on each arm depends on the vigor of the
vine and the space between vines. As the shoots grow up-
ward, they are tied to upper wires, there being three wires on
the trellis for this method. This method is now known as the
Horizontal Arm Spur. It has a serious fault in its trouble-
some spurs and has almost entirely given way to a modifica-
tion called the Chautauqua Arm method, much used in the
great Chautauqua grape-belt. As one of the chief methods
of training the grape in eastern America, this must be de-
scribed in detail.
The Chautauqua Arm method.
The trellis for this method has two wires, although occasion-
ally three are used. The lower wire is eighteen or twenty
126 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
inches above the ground and the second thirty-four inches
above the lower. If three are used, the wires are twenty
inches apart. F. E. Gladwin, in charge of the vineyard lab-
oratory of the New York Agricultural Experiment Station
at Fredonia, in the heart of the Chautauqua belt, describes
this method of training as follows:
“The vines are cut back to two buds at each pruning the
first two years. If the vines are vigorous two canes are tied
up at the beginning of the third year; if scant, but one is left
and this, if the growth is extremely unfavorable, is cut back
to two buds. The canes are carried up obliquely to the upper
wire when the growth permits and are there firmly tied either
with twine or fine wire, the latter being more commonly used.
The canes are also loosely tied to the lower wire. The pruning
for the fourth year consists in cutting away all but two or three
canes and a number of spurs from the arms formed by tying
up the two canes the previous year. The vine now consists of
two arms, arising from near the ground, with two or three
canes of the previous year, and several two-bud spurs at in-
tervals along the arms. As far as possible such canes as have
arisen but a short distance above the lower wire are selected.
All the old wood projecting beyond the last cane retained on
each of the arms is cut away. The arms of the third year are
bent down from their oblique position and are tied firmly to
the lower wire, to the right and left of the center of the vine.
These are now permanent arms. The vine at this time consists
of two arms, arising from near the ground, tied to the lower
wire to the right and left of the center, and on these are two
or three canes, pruned long enough to reach to the middle
wire at least, and if possible to the upper. They are tied so
that they stand in a vertical or oblique position. Along the
arms at intervals of a few inches are spurs, consisting of two
buds. If the vinevardist maintains the arms permanently,
these spurs furnish the fruiting wood for the succeeding year.
TRAINING GRAPES IN EASTERN AMERICA 127
“ At the pruning for the fifth year one of the arms is cut away
entirely, close to the point of its origin. The remaining arm,
reaching from the ground to a point a few inches below the
level of the lower wire, now becomes the permanent stem.
The vineyardist must now provide for the arm cut away.
This is done by the selection of a cane, arising from the re-
maining arm at a point below the lower wire, either directly,
Fie. 16. Chautauqua training; vine ready to prune.
or from a spur left for the purpose. This is pruned to reach
the top wire and is tied obliquely to it. This cane at the next
pruning is tied down to the lower wire and becomes the second
arm. Then the same selection of canes and spurs is made from
it as was made at the previous pruning, and the canes are tied
up as before. However, if the grower desires to retain both
arms of the preceding year for a few years, canes that have
grown from the spurs may be tied up and provision made for
the following year through further spurring. If but a single
128 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
arm is retained, it is pruned in the same way. Spurs may be
obtained from canes that have arisen from dormant buds on
the arm, or by spurring in the basal canes of the fruiting wood
of the year previous. A combination of both methods of re-
newal will in the long run work out the better, as the repeated
spurring in of the basal canes will result in greatly lengthened
spurs that will require frequent cutting out. While the canes
that arise directly from dormant buds on wood two years and
over are not necessarily the best fruiting ones, they can, how-
ever, be utilized for renewal purposes.
“The ideal vine pruned to this system now consists of a stem
reaching from sixteen or eighteen inches above the ground
level or a few inches below the level of the lower wire.
Such a vine is shown in Figure 16. From the head two
arms arise, one extending to the right, the other to the left
and tied along the lower wire, each arm not extending for
more than two feet and a half to either side of the head.
From the arms two canes on each are tied vertically or
obliquely to the top wire. In addition there are left two or
three spurs, growing from the upper side of each arm, located
at well-spaced intervals starting close to the head; these may
be used for the renewal of the arms. The shoots are not tied.
“One of the chief faults of the Chautauqua Arm methed is
the tendency of the best matured, and most desirable canes
to develop at or near the upper wire, while those lower down
are often too short, or so poorly matured as to be unfitted for
fruiting purposes. When the wood, bearing the well-developed
upper canes, is brought down for arms, a considerable interval
of the arm from the head to the point where the canes arise is
without fruiting wood. Under such conditions the growth will
be again thrown to the extremities. If spurring on the arms
has been practiced, this undesirable condition is eliminated.
With either type of renewal, spurring should be practiced.
The fruit from vines trained by this method reaches its highest
TRAINING GRAPES IN EASTERN AMERICA 129
development at or near the level of the upper wire, that on the
lower shoots is, as a rule, quite inferior. This comes from
the fact that the sap flow is more vigorous at these upper points,
resulting in more and healthier leaves, which, in turn, influence
the fruit for the better.”’
Keuka High Renewal.
Several methods of training pass under the general term
“High Renewal,” the significance of which becomes apparent
in the discussion of the Keuka High Renewal method which
is probably now the most common of the several types. In
most of these methods the trellis is put up with three wires,
but oceasionally only two wires are used and still less often
four. The lowest wire on the three-wire trellis is eighteen or
twenty inches from the ground with twenty-inch intervals
between wires. Gladwin, who has direct charge of vineyard
experimental work about Keuka Lake for the New York
Agricultural Experiment Station, describes current practices
in pruning according to this method as follows:
“At each pruning for the first two years the vines are cut
back to two buds. However, with strong-growing varieties
like Concord, Niagara and Isabella, and under good soil con-
ditions, the stem may be formed the second year. With moder-
ate-growing varieties and under average conditions, the forma-
tion of the stem is left until the third year. The straightest
and best-matured cane is left for the purpose. This is carried
to the lower wire and there firmly tied with willow. As soon
-as the shoots have made sufficient growth they are loosely tied
to the wires that they may be kept away from the tillage tools.
The fourth year the head of the vine is formed. This should
stand a few inches below the lower wire. Two canes grow-
ing from the stem near this position are selected, one being
tied to the right and the other to the left along the lower wire.
In the Keuka Lake District, the canes are tied with willows.
K
130 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
In addition, at least two spurs of two buds each are retained
near the head. With Concord, the canes may carry about
ten buds each, but with Catawba, as grown on the hillsides of
the Central Lakes Region of New York, the canes should not
carry above six buds each. As the shoots develop from the
horizontal canes, they are tied with rye straw to the middle
and upper wires. This summer tying is almost continuous
after the shoots are long enough to reach the middle wire.
“The following year all the wood is cut away except two or
three canes that have developed from the basal buds of the canes
put up the previous year, or that have grown from the spurs.
In the event of a third cane being retained, it is tied along the
middle wire. Spurs are again maintained close to the head
for renewal purposes. The other two canes are tied along the
lower wire as before. If the same spurs are used for a few
years they become so long that the canes arising from them
reach above the wire and cannot be well managed in the ‘ willow-
ing.’ It is desirable to provide new spurs annually, selecting
those canes for
the purpose that
arise from the head
of the vine or near
it. It is possible
by careful pruning
to so cut away the
old wood that
practically all that
remains after each
pruning is the stem. Thus the vine is renewed almost to
the ground. When the stem approaches the end of its use-
fulness, a shoot is allowed to grow from the ground, and the
old one is cut away. Figure 17 shows a vine pruned by the
Keuka method.
“This method of training is especially well adapted to slow
Fie. 17. Keuka method of training.
TRAINING GRAPES IN EASTERN AMERICA 1381
growing varieties, or those situated on poor soils, where but
little wood growth is made. It is ideally adapted for the
growing of Catawba on the hillsides of Keuka Lake. It is
well adapted to late-maturing varieties planted out of their
zone. Concord, growing under average conditions, is too
vigorous to be trained by this method. It makes a tremendous
growth of wood out of all proportion to the quantity of fruit,
which is inclined to be very inferior. The chief objection to
this method is the amount of summer tying involved which
comes at a time when attention to tillage should be given.
It might prove profitable in the growing of dessert varieties
that have been discarded because of lack of vigor. On thin
hillside soils, Catawba requires training modelled after this
method but on the heavier upland ones, with shorter pruning,
it can be grown on the Chautauqua Arm plan. Delaware,
Iona, Dutchess, Campbell, Eumelan, Jessica, Vergennes and
Regal are, as a rule, grown to better advantage when trained
by the High Renewal method.”
Fan-training.
The only other method now in use in which the shoots may
be trained upright is that in which the canes are disposed of
in fan-shape. This method was much used a generation ago
but is rapidly becoming obsolete. In fan-training the renewals
are made yearly from spurs near the ground, and the fruiting
canes are carried up obliquely and so form a fan. The great
advantage in fan-training is that a trunk is almost dispensed
with, which greatly facilitates laying down the vine in winter
where winter-protection is needed. There are several objec-
tions to this method in commercial plantations. The chief
one is that the spurs become long, crooked and almost un-
manageable so that renewals from the root must be made
frequently. Another is that the fruit is borne close to the ground
and becomes soiled with mud in dashing rains. The vines,
132 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
also, are inconvenient in shape for tying. There are two or
three modifications of fan-training which may be described
as mongrel methods between this and the High Renewal and
Horizontal Arm methods, none of which, however, is now in
general favor.
II. Shoots drooping
Quite by accident, William Kniffin, a stone mason living
at Clintondale, New York, in the Hudson River grape region,
discovered that grapes of large size and handsome appearance
could be grown on vines in which the canes were trained hori-
zontally with the shoots drooping. He put his discovery in
practice and from it have come the several methods of training
grapes which bear his name. Kniffin’s discovery was made
about 1850 and the merits of his methods spread so rapidly
over eastern America that by the end of the century the various
Kniffn methods were more generally used than any others.
Grape-growers now agree that strong-growing vines like Con-
cord, Niagara and Clinton are best trained to one or another
of the Kniffin methods. There are several modifications of
Kniffin’s method, three of which are now in common use, the
most popular being the Single-stem, Four-cane Kniffin.
The trellis for the three methods carries two wires, the lower
placed at the height of three to three and a half feet and the
upper from two to two and a half feet above it. To permit
this height of wires, the posts must be from eight to eight and
a half feet in length, and must be firmly set with the end posts
well braced.
Single-stem, Four-cane Kniffin.
As practiced at the New York Agricultural Experiment
Station, the vines are trained as follows:
One trunk is carried to the top wire the third year after
planting, or if the growth is not long enough at this time, it
TRAINING GRAPES IN EASTERN AMERICA 1338
is carried to the lower wire and there tied. In this case, the
following year a cane is extended to the top wire. This trunk
is permanent. If the stem reaches the upper wire the third
year, growers break out many of the developing shoots and
allow only the strongest to grow, choosing those that arise
close to the wires. The stem should be tied tightly to the
top wire and somewhat loosely to the lower. If girdling re-
sults at the top, it is not objectionable as the head of the vine
should be below rather than above the wire. When the shoots
are sufficiently hardened,
those growing close- to
the wires should be
loosely tied to prevent
injury during cultiva-
tion. At the beginning
of the fourth year, as
shown in Fig. 18, the
vine should consist of a
stem extending from the
ground to a point below
thetop wire. From this, a
all but two canes and Fia. 18. Single-stem, Four-cane Kniffin
training.
two spurs of two buds
each have been cut away below each wire level. As growth
is most vigorous at the top of the stem, four to six more
buds are left on the upper than on the lower canes. - 9 ci eee 5.00
Puare XIX. — Iona (X32).
a
i)
:
MARKETING THE CROPS 249
Pama Ol per basket. — <6 2 # « wos. $5.00
Hammes003 . . . at oh s elt eee hee 1.50
iemee tor third year s-)2 02,56 18° 2a. 8 $95.85
Ni CCRCMPIERS yates), sles do ey he en oe EERO. OO
Fourth Year
Interest on value of viney ard @) $800 per acre. =. 2 . © ‘$18:00
TRIE ie Rel ar i oe Stine su er eee eS cae 2.50
TRyines %). SLA, (er CRMC Macs ee AL ie cee sae 2.90
Spraying and aroneells oe? 4.00
Cultivating, plowing, harrowing, hand- hocing and plowing back
one furrow. . Smee eae 9.25
Trellis upkeep, driving pORts, tightening ° wires, We. ey ys 2.50
Pulling and poling out brush. . pehe ice EP ak 1.69
No. baskets sold @ .16 per basket 1000 view $160.00
Cost of baskets @ $20 per thousand . ... . 20.60
mickinmeaiaellper basket’, -.-, <2. 0. -. *. . 10.00
Pacman Ol per baskets. 2) 04 5 . .. . See ee one tre eh cs 3.00
Dutotor fourth year“. 2. . 2. 4 « « $83.84
Mrconicmneree? Sows se Se ee. se ee oe pLOOIOO
Ontzonortour years). 6) = 2 « ). ar. = -t $245.44
JNCcOMeOmiouUrnyeans <=. 3. ./ ficken ee Ritex oes Soa) Eee. S| Barkly: Victoria roe ela. Fes ee ee
Beacon’) Sect e eerse ic. ool are alleen 2 [Ma bON sy ciesce eed oer eee 4] coe Bae
oN ey peaches ate ieee it ley le ie _ ol HCLIpPSOysc.5 \. areca Creel eae Cle olen’
Berckmansieeeee || ae coin bts 2 tas J <\ldorado. =. «se o< ae lees | |
Black Hagle......|... Weal Blvitaien cn doe °F |) ele) |e | eae
Brighton. 7-e Fees oe te elle yas) Emp Ite States are diene cae Fl aera eae
Brrllisniteto ere seneal ens [Ra ees-cill 2 sce) Ertabieae ferences ested cee | # |e eare
FS LQwitte een ee * Mumedelia< eee ous | ee ee bagel dais |\io
Campbell Marly 22 3.20) Sole see (bumelance ae cee eee ered las Flee
Ganadameiocs scion seoteel earl Bos 2 (4a jaar tece Soe al ee Edler We mn
Canandaigua..... salseah * Is cele. liters Vim SOniycn 5) ||)henel eee eee *
Gamma’ cece = oro Pees Va esl (cetera +) |Gaertners o- 2c oel ee es alee
Gatawhbattan meee creed Se EAE alee F Gienevate < SE Se 3 eee cll (eae ci
Champion. 2-5 a... Ae a fae | Stee 13 Goethe aan s senses toet eke Si en a es"
Chautauqua...... eles alae elec Golds@oners o5 see (ies lee fo (eRe Vs
@levener.)52202 3% FM | Ray eee 2. | Grem Golden as.2 |e | Slane ees
@hingiont.. fees cei tapered er ee le SeeallaGurini(os tole eye a olla alloc 6 Eee ee
Colerain. ee creas ox all EA enonal ete beste glatis-os aceenerckel te sealing ee alee
Columbian Helen Keller? =. 5 =\||. 2 s|)22 ies eee ee
Imperial fa. nciiee * Herbert: ac lel eee a Pel (artis
Concord a2 anole ae Pree fel Pome meal llc (oye leit mt eee irae lgnca| iis ole 2 | eat eee
Cottages a. alee Eee lh i tee ELC KS 4 te seen eel ance Cee bade ba tes 6
@revyeling<..2.. rales scavell, CROWS y lee, ee) eel eel gO bare se aere- a lentes |e bi Penal liber).
Croton er ee on ete = Re PE os EE OSL ONG! o- eerarieie crcl eee Fl sc ieee
Delavoets etn! te Sats Salo Comper sgt ob att era eee a ee *
Delaware........ eo * isabelle. aur: a |(* olen ee
Diamonds. ces ae elie heer * ....|Janesvalles = scinse £0] eae ee om
MISCELLANIES
289
TasLe IV.—SnHowrne Bioominc TIME OF GRAPES — Continued
|
|
Very EARLY
EARLY
MIpDSEASON
Very LATE
LCR. - Sas oe
Lady Washington.|...]...|.
indleyee es 22 < fe.|52 ane
NEUECTE epee ohio Osco sasl ace Ae
Missouri Riesling.|.. .
Montefiore... .2.|... age
INA UORGET PA ren ee aan ee as
INTO Onto. Sheen ee
Northern
Muscadine.....]...
MRE 9 Oe aes
* xe 4 4 H-
*
y|(Peabody jon. sss
Perfection... .-~.- -
a|letediaiass wok ate66 ie
MIPIOKCE. hens ee
n\Pocklinetone =... Sen | tere
..|Poughkeepsie..... palietes ke
_\Leetonising Cee oe oe eal ee
all RG¥0 [0 acetone eee cae aac nome eee
a\SECretany:. «<< sii: werd ete
Pe SeNasGUAmerer aire. eel eesee tlt arena lien oe
../Stark-Star SFillGwcte| Sete Eh avs
faim phys nae se PEAS
SW Sterissey tes eae ie
.|Wergennes.:.2..... ae eek
.|Winchell
b
|
fe]
| a
amen |S
>» | A
a | &
Hi<
> |
*
*
ee eH HH KH: “xe He HH: | Mipseason
* # EF H-
a
BR
4
ss
>
Bl) ss
Sh |e
S| =
od be
*
*
*
*
*
RINGING GRAPE VINES
The ringing of woody plants is a well-known horticultural
practice.
Three objects may be attained by ringing: unpro-
ductive plants may be brought into bearing by ringing; the
size of the fruits may be increased and thereby the plants be
made more productive; and the maturity of the fruit may be
hastened.
In European countries, ringing has long been prac-
ticed with all tree-fruits and the grape, but in America the
operation is recommended only for the apple and the grape
U
290 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
and with neither fruit is ringing widely practiced. Experiments
carried on at the New York Agricultural Experiment Station
by Paddock, as reported in Bulletin 151 from this Station, show
that ringing may well be practiced by grape-growers under
some conditions. Since Paddock’s experiments, and possibly
to some extent before, the grape has been ringed to produce
exhibition fruits or a fancy product for the market.
Ringing consists in taking from the vine a layer of bark
around the vine through the cortex and bast of the plant. The
width of the wound varies from that of a simple cut made with
a knife to a band of bark an inch in diameter. The operation
is performed during that period of growth in which the bark
peels most readily from the vine, the period of greatest cam-
bial activity. The term “ringing” is preferred to “girdling,”
a word sometimes used, since the latter properly designates a
wound which extends into and usually kills the plant.
The theory of ringing is simple. Unassimilated sap passes
from the roots of the plant to the leaves through the outer
layer of the woody cylinder. In the leaves this raw material
is acted on by various agents, after which it is distributed to
the several organs of the plant through vessels in the inner bark.
When plants are ringed, the upward flow of sap is continued as
before the operation, but the newly made food compounds can-
not pass beyond the injury, and therefore the top of the plant is
supplied with an extra amount of food at the expense of the
parts below the ring. The extra food produces the results
noted.
It turns out in practice that ringing is usually harmful to the
plant, as one might expect from so unnatural an operation.
Injury to the plant arises from the fact that parts of the vine
are starved at the expense of other parts; and because, when
the bark is removed, the outer layers of the woody cylinder
dry out very quickly and thus check to some extent the up-
ward flow of sap through evaporation from the exposed wood.
MISCELLANIES 291
Thus, not infrequently, the plant’s vitality is seriously drained.
Nevertheless, vineyards may be found in which ringing has
been extensively practiced many seasons in succession and
which continue to yield profitable crops, the growers having
learned to perform the work of ringing so as to injure the vines
but little.
Ringing without harm to the plant depends much on the way
in which the vines have been pruned. For instance, if the
vines are pruned to the two-arm Kniffin method, the ringing
of bark should be done from both arms just beyond the fifth
bud. Thus, the ten buds left on the vine produce enough
leaf surface to supply the food necessary to keep the vine in
vigorous condition. When the four-arm Kniffin method is
used, the two top arms only are ringed, and even so three or
four buds must be left on each for renewals. Whatever the
method of training, it will be seen frdm these examples that
some unringed wood must be left to the vine with which to
supply leafy shoots to support the vine. Some growers ring
their vines only every other year, thus giving them an oppor-
tunity to recover from whatever loss of vigor they may have
sustained in the season of ringing.
Several other considerations are important in ringing: First,
the vines must not be permitted to carry too large a crop.
Again, the amount of fruit on the ringed portion of the vine
must depend on the amount of leaf surface not only of the
plant but of the ringed arms, each ringed arm acting somewhat
independently so far as its crop is concerned. If too many
clusters are left on the ringed arms, it always follows that the
fruit is inferior and often worthless. Lastly, all fruit be-
tween the rings and the trunk must be removed, for it does
not mature properly and so adds only to the drain on the
plant’s vitality.
As to the results, it is certain from the experiments that have
been conducted and from the experience of grape-growers, that
292 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
the maturity of the fruit is hastened, and berries and bunches
are larger when the ringing has been done intelligently. Many
growers hold that fruit produced on ringed vines is never quite
up to the mark in quality and in firmness of fruit. There
seems to be a difference in opinion about this falling off in
quality, however, although unquestionably, choice sorts, as
Delaware, Iona and Dutchess, suffer more or less in quality.
It is commonly agreed, also,
that varieties, the fruits of
which crack badly, as the
Worden, suffer more from
¥ cracking on ringed than on
unringed vines.
Experiment and experience
prove that the best results of
ringing are obtained if the
work is done when the grapes
are about one-third grown.
Of course the exact time de-
pends on the season and on
Fie. 52. Tools used in ringing - :
grape-vines are shown in 1 and 2; while the variety. The operation
3 and 4 show ringed vines at the be- jg variously performed and is
ginning and the close of the season.
easily done with a sharp knife,
but when large vineyards are to be ringed the grower ought to
provide himself with some simple tool. Paddock, in the bulle-
tin previously mentioned, pictures two of these tools and these
are reproduced in Fig. 52.
In conclusion it must be said that it is doubtful whether the
gains attained by ringing offset the losses. The practice is
chiefly of value only when exhibition clusters of grapes
are wanted or when it is necessary to hasten the maturity
of the crop. Always, however, the work must be_per-
formed with intelligence and judgment or the losses will offset
the gains.
MISCELLANIES 293
BAGGING GRAPES
In some localities bagging is considered an essential to profit-
able grape-growing. The bags serve to protect the grapes
against birds. In some grape regions vineyards suffer more
from the depredations of robins and other birds than from all
other troubles. Grapes bearing small berries and having
tender pulp and those which shell most readily from the stem
suffer most. Of standard sorts, Delaware is probably more
enticing to robins than any other variety. There is only one
way of preventing damage to grapes from birds and that is by
bagging the clusters.
Bagging is also an effective means of protecting the grape
from several fungi and insects. In home plantations or small
commercial vineyards, bagging the bunches often eliminates
the necessity of spraying for fungi and for most of the insects
that trouble the grape. Because of the warmth afforded by the
bags, bagged grapes ripen a little earlier and are of somewhat
higher quality than those not bagged. Grapes bagged are pro-
tected from early frost, thus prolonging the season. Grapes
that have been protected from the elements during the summer
are more attractive than those exposed to the weather, since the
fruits are free from weather marks and present a fresh, bright
appearance, which puts them in a grade above unbagged
grapes. Bagging often enables the grower to sell his crop as a
faney product.
Grapes are bagged as soon as the fruits are well set, the
sooner the better if protection against fungi is one of the pur-
poses. Under no circumstances, however, should the clusters
be bagged while in blossom. A patent bag made for the pur-
pose may be purchased or, serving equally well, the common
one and one-half and two-pound manila bags used by grocers
prove satisfactory. One of the patent bags which is known as
the Ideal Clasp Bag has a metal clasp attached to the top for
294 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
securing the bag in place over the cluster. In using the
grocer’s bag, before it is put in place the corners of both the
top and bottom are cut off by placing several bags on a firm
level surface and using a broad-shaped chisel. Cutting off the
corners of the top enables the operator to close the bag neatly
over the cluster, while cutting off the corners of the bottom fur-
nishes a means of escape for any water that gets in the bag.
In putting the bag in place, the top is pinned above the lateral
from which the bunch hangs, and must not be fastened about
the small stem of the cluster, as the wind blowing the bag al-
most invariably breaks the cluster from the vine. The largest
pins to be purchased in dry-goods stores are used in pinning the
bags. The bags remain until the grapes are picked. Wet
weather does not injure bags and seemingly they grow stronger
with exposure to sun and wind.
The cost of the bags and the work of putting them on is no
small item. To secure the best results, the work must be done
at the period between the dropping of the blossoms and the
formation of the seeds, when the grapes are about the size of
a small pea. This is a busy time for the grape-grower, which
adds to the cost. When the work is conducted on a large
scale, the cost is about two dollars a thousand bags, this figure
covering both the cost of bags and labor. Women do the work
more expeditiously than men and soon become very skillful in
putting on the bags. Despite the trouble and cost of bagging,
growers seeking to produce a fancy product find that the ex-
penditure proves profitable.
WINTER-PROTECTION OF GRAPES
With a little care as to winter-protection, grapes may be
grown profitably in northern regions where, without protection,
the vines are killed or injured by low temperatures. Indeed, it is
little short of amazing how well grapes can be grown in north-
MISCELLANIES 295
ern regions where nature wears a most austere countenance in
winter, if hardy early sorts are planted in warm soils and situ-
ations, and the vines are covered in the winter. Occasionally
one finds grapes grown profitably in commercial vineyards in
the northern states in regions where protection must be given
to prevent winter-killing, the extra work of giving protection
being more than offset by the high price received in local markets
for the fruit.
In all locations in which winter-protection must be given,
several other precautions are helpful or even necessary. ‘Thus,
cultivation must cease early in the season, and a cover-crop be
sown to help harden and mature the vines. The grapes, also,
must not be planted in soils rich in nitrogen, and nitrogenous
fertilizers must be applied with care. The pruning should be
such as does not induce great growth. These simple precau-
tions to hasten maturity often suffice in climates where the
danger of winter-killing is but slight, but where danger is
imminent the vines must be covered either by wrapping or by
laying down. Wrapping with straw may suffice for a few
vines, but when many vines are to be protected, laying them
down is cheaper and much more effectual.
By laying down is meant that the vines must be placed on
the ground and there be protected by earth and snow or other
covering. It is obvious that to protect thus, the vines must
receive special training; otherwise the trunks may be too stiff
for bending. Some method of training must be chosen in
which renewals may be made rather frequently from the ground
so that if the trunks become large, clumsy and unpliable, a more
manageable trunk can be trained. If the provisions for re-
newal are kept in mind, any one of the several methods of
training grapes explained in Chapter VIII on training may be
used.
Laying down must be preceded by pruning, after which the
arms and trunk are loosened from the wires and bent to the
296 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
ground. Bending is facilitated by removing a spade full of
earth from the side of the vine in the direction in which the
vine is to be bent. The trunk is then laid on the earth and
sufficient soil placed on it to keep it in place on the ground. If
the danger of winter-killing is great because of the tenderness
of the variety or the austerity of the climate, it often becomes
necessary to cover the whole plant lightly with earth. Small
growers often make use of coarse manure, straw, corn-stalks or
similar covering, in which case the vines are held on the ground
by fence-rails or other timbers; but protecting with material
that must be brought into the vineyard is expensive and not
more satisfactory than earth.
The vines can be put down at any time after the leaves drop
and before the earth begins to freeze. It is more important that
the vines be taken up at the proper time in the spring. If un-
covered too early and cold weather follows, injury may result
and more harm be done than if the vines had not been covered.
On the other hand, if the earth is permitted to remain too long,
foliage and vine are tender both to sunshine and frost. A grape-
grower in New York who has had much experience in laying
down vines in a vineyard of some thirty or forty acres says
that the work may be done at a cost of $6 an acre at the
average wage paid for farm-labor. It must be expected in a
large plantation, no matter how well the work of covering is
done, that occasionally a trunk will be broken, making it neces-
sary to graft the vine if a shoot does not spring up from below
the break.
Ripening DaTES AND LENGTH OF SEASON FOR GRAPES
Every grape-grower should know when his varieties may
be expected to ripen and the length of season that they will
keep. The commercial fruit-grower by all means should have
this information. It is not sufficient that he know only roughly
MISCELLANIES 297
at what season his varieties ripen; for, to take the turn of the
market, he must know exactly when a variety will ripen and
how long it will keep. He needs this information, also, that he
may distribute his labor better throughout the picking season.
Unfortunately, the data as to ripening time given by origi-
nators and introducers of varieties are not always reliable. This
untrustworthiness of data is readily accounted for in several
ways: First, growers do not generally agree as to when grapes
are ripe nor as to how long they are fit to eat. Again, much
confusion as to when varieties ripen and how long they will
keep arises from the fact that grapes ripen at different times in
different places, and it is difficult for the grape-grower in
Maine to make allowance in season for varieties, the time of
ripening of which is given for Maryland. There are also
other causes than the seasonal differences in grape regions for
variability in ripening time; thus, some soils are warmer and
quicker than others, and on these grapes ripen earlier. Appli-
cation of nitrogenous fertilizers may delay the period of ripen-
ing somewhat. Grapes ripen perceptibly earlier on old plants
than on young ones. Lastly, every vineyard in a particular
region has its own particular climate caused by the lay of land,
nearness to water, air currents and altitude which cause small
differences in ripening.
The following table taken from Bulletin No. 408 of the New
York Agricultural Experiment Station gives the ripening dates
of grapes at Geneva, New York. It is necessary that the reader
know something about the conditions affecting the ripening time
at Geneva. The latitude is 42° 50’ 46’... The altitude is 525
feet above sea level. The vineyard lies a mile west of a rela-
tively large body of water. The soil is a cold heavy clay which
must delay ripening time somewhat. The land is level. The
data are given as an average for three seasons, 1913-1915.
The figures given for “weeks in common storage” cover a
variable number of years, but for all varieties three or more
298
years.
MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
The grapes, after being picked, were at once placed in
common storage in a room on the second floor of a building.
There conditions were not ideal, and no doubt the season of
storage would have been prolonged somewhat had the fruit
been kept in a better storage-room.
TABLE V.—SHOWING THE RIPENING TIME OF GRAPES
» »
dey a itian| on Peele a | ele ae
BIR el elal ele aoe) elel al &
eS ae ees ven bneh Ibet || | =
Boon el pay et Nierelt | Bon|>l|ala]4
IN EINE + oll, sae ee -| * MPOSEHN sy 17 a.
PMSA bolls Go. a0 cean Poe .|Downing...|. *
Barhy:. eee 28 * .|Dracut
Beacon. iG Se alls Amber... 9 Eli Wawra leet. &. 3
Belle sent ee 8 a tae Dutchess 4)" e220 enleee *
Berckmans.| 21 * 72 |(Barlya@ bios eS Cree |e
Black Eagle| 18 * .| Early
Brighton...| 20 * ; Vietore .|) ek Edie Eee (eee nes | as
Brilliant...) 11 * SHILDERKOeS a rae tome ee cr
Blown eee 6 * .|Eclipse.... Ze Gate Baa. ua
Campbell Eldorado ..| 17 soy hese | A
Harlye.o| 2 Maa UE el fy or fae Elvira..... 18 *
Garisig sien |b hcl eal eee ee * .|Empire
Canandai- States. l|als|4
Hudaleo....| 12 FSi aio ol NUCL ilin o eens 10 *
Hosford.... 6 * .|Northern
onaho. 2s : is} * Musca-
Isabella....} 11 * Gines..:«; 9 *
Janesville. .| 13 * ...|Norton. 7 ae:
Jefferson...}| 18 Ber * |Oporto 12 Bolt a
Jessies. . =... - 12 * 5 OvArIAe. 5 oo 11 *
Jewel...... 12 * ae a||Reabodyaree lines 2 Bea |e
Kensington | 19 ae * .|Perfection . 8 rail tg
LEGTavE OES |e ee * letras. 44,
with few small warts; brush short, wine-colored. Berries small,
oblate, black, glossy with thick bloom, persistent, firm; skin thin,
tender with very dark wine-colored pigment; flesh green with reddis'1
tinge, translucent, juicy, fine-grained, tender, spicy, tart; fair in
quality. Seeds free, one to five, small, short, ight brown.
IDEAL
(Labrusea, Vinifera, Bourquiniana)
Ideal is a handsome seedling of Delaware, from which it dif-
fers chiefly in being larger in bunch and berry, attaining in both
of these characters nearly the size of Catawba. In Kansas and
Missouri, this variety is highly recommended, not only for the
high quality of the fruit, ranking with Delaware in quality, but
because of vigorous, healthy, productive vines. But farther
north the vines are precariously hardy and not sufficiently fruit-
ful, healthy nor vigorous to warrant high recommendation.
Ideal originated with John Burr, Leavenworth, Kansas, from
seed of Delaware, about 1885.
Vine vigorous, doubtfully hardy, productive; tendrils intermittent,
bifid or trifid. Canes long, numerous, slender, dark brown; nodes
enlarged, flattened; internodes long. Leaves large, variable in color ;
lobes three to five; petiolar sinus deep, wide; teeth deep, narrow ;
upper surface light green, dull; lower surface pale green, pubescent.
Fruit early mid-season, keeps well. Clusters large, broad, heavily
shouldered; pedicel thick; brush green. Berries large, round, dark
390 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
red with thin bloom, usually persistent, firm; skin thick, tough,
adherent; flesh green, tender, aromatic, sweet next the skin, acid at
the center; good to very good. Seeds adherent, large, plump, brown.
IoNA
(Labrusea, Vinifera)
In flavor, the fruit of Iona (Plate XIX) has a rare combina-
tion of sweetness and acidity, pure, delicate and vinous. The
flesh is transparent, melting, tender, juicy and of uniform con-
sistency quite to the center. The seeds are few and small and
part readily from the flesh. The color is a peculiar dark-red
wine with a tint of amethyst, variable and not always attrac-
tive. The bunch is large but loose, with berries varying in size
and ripening unevenly. The fruit may be kept until late winter.
The vine characters of Iona are not as good as those of the fruit.
To do well, the vine must have a soil exactly suited to its wants,
seemingly thriving best in deep, dry, sandy or gravelly clays.
Iona responds especially well when trained against walls or
buildings, attaining under such conditions rare perfection. The
vines are doubtfully hardy and in many parts of the North
must have winter protection; they are not vigorous and are in-
clined to overbear, to remedy which they must have close prun-
ing. In localities in which mildew and rot thrive, the variety
is badly attacked by these diseases. Iona originated with
C. W. Grant, Iona Island, New York, from seed of Diana planted
in 1885.
Vine weak, doubtfully hardy, unproductive. Canes short, light
brown; nodes enlarged; internodes short; tendrils intermittent,
bifid. Leaves thick; upper surface light green, dull, smooth; lower
surface grayish-green, heavily pubescent; lobes three to five with
terminal one acute; petiolar sinus of medium depth and width; basal
sinus shallow; lateral sinus shallow, wide; teeth shallow. Flowers
self-fertile, open late; stamens upright.
Fruit late, keeps well. Clusters medium in size, sometimes double-
shouldered, slender, tapering, loose; brush pale green. Berries uni-
PutateE XXIX.— Vergennes (X 2).
ws A
a i My)
‘ *
ota its Post oh oe “y
: yma ‘ee Me
LY oy
VARIETIES OF GRAPES 391
form, oval, round, dull, light and dark red with thin bloom, persistent,
firm; skin tough, adherent, slightly astringent; flesh green, trans-
lucent, juicy, fine-grained, tender, melting, vinous; very good. Seeds
free, one to four, small, broad, plump, brown.
ISABELLA
(Labrusea, Vinifera)
Alexander, Black Cape, Christie’s Improved Isabella, Conck-
ling’s Wilding, Constantia, Dorchester, Gibb’s Grape, Hensell’s
Long Island, Payne’s Early, Helene, Woodward
Isabella (Plate XX) is now of little more than historical inter-
est, it having been one of the mainstays of American viticulture.
In appearance, the fruit of Isabella is fully as attractive as that
of any black grape, the clusters being large and well formed and
the berries glossy black with thick bloom. The flavor is good,
but the thick skin and muskiness in taste are objectionable. The
grapes keep and ship well. Isabella is surpassed in vine char-
acters by many other kinds, notably Concord, which has taken
its place. The lustrous green, ample foliage which remains
late in the season, and the vigor of the vine, make this variety
an attractive ornamental, well adapted for growing on arbors,
porches and. trellises. The origin of Isabella is not known.
It was obtained by William Prince, Flushing, Long Island,
about 1816 from Mrs. Isabella Gibbs, Brooklyn, New York.
Vine vigorous, hardy, productive. Canes short, numerous with
heavy pubescence, thick, light brown; nodes enlarged, flattened; in-
ternodes short; tendrils continuous, long, bifid or trifid. Leaves
thick; upper surface dark green, smooth, glossy; lower surface
whitish-green, heavily pubescent; lobes three when present with
terminal lobe obtuse; petiolar sinus shallow, narrow, often closed,
overlapping; basal sinus usually wanting; lateral sinus shallow,
narrow, frequently notched ; teeth shallow, wide. Flowers self-fertile,
open in mid-season; stamens upright.
Fruit late, keeps and ships well. Clusters large, cylindrical,
frequently single-shouldered; pedicel slender, smooth; brush long,
392 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
yellowish-green. Berries medium to large, oval, black with heavy
bloom, persistent, soft; skin thick, tough, adherent, astringent; flesh
pale green, translucent, juicy, fine-grained, tender, meaty, some foxi-
ness, sweet; good. Seeds one to three, large, broad, distinctly notched,
short, brown with yellow tips.
ISABELLA SEEDLING
(Labrusea, Vinifera)
Isabella Seedling is an early, vigorous, productive offspring
of Isabella. In fruit characters it greatly resembles its parent,
but ripens its crop earlier and has a more compact bunch.
Like that of its parent, the fruit is of good quality and keeps
remarkably well. This seedling is now grown more than Isa-
bella and, while not of any considerable commercial importance,
is far more deserving attention as a market grape than some of
the poorly flavored kinds more generally grown. There are
several varieties under this name. Two are mentioned by
Warder; one of Ohio and one of New York origin. The
Isabella Seedling here described originated with G. A. Ensen-
berger, Bloomington, Illinois, in 1889.
Vine vigorous, healthy, hardy, productive. Canes long, thick,
dark brown, often with a red tinge, with thin bloom; nodes prominent,
flattened ; internodes long; tendrils intermittent or continuous, bifid.
Leaves healthy, large, thick; upper surface green, dull; lower surface
pale green or grayish-green, occasionally with a tinge of bronze,
pubescent. Flowers self-fertile; stamens upright.
Fruit early, keeps well. Clusters large, long, slender, cylindrical,
usually single-shouldered, loose, compact. Berries large, oval, often
pear-shaped, dull black with thick bloom, persistent, soft; skin thick
with some red pigment; flesh pale green, juicy, tender, coarse, vinous ;
good. Seeds numerous, free, large, broad, notched, dark brown.
ISRAELLA
(Labrusea, Vinifera)
Tsraella came from C. W. Grant contemporaneously with
Tona and was heralded as the earliest good grape in cultivation.
VARIETIES OF GRAPES 393
For several years after its introduction, it was widely tried but
was almost everywhere discarded because of the poor quality
and unattractive appearance of the fruit and Jack of vigor,
hardiness and productiveness in the vine. Grant grew Israella
from seed of Isabella planted in 1885.
Vine lacking in vigor, unproductive. Canes slender, dark brown;
nodes enlarged, flattened; internodes short; tendrils continuous,
bifid. Leaves large; upper surface light green, dull, rugose; lower
surface pale green, pubescent; lobes one to five, faint; petiolar
sinus deep, narrow; teeth shallow, sharp; stamens upright.
Fruit late, keeps well. Clusters large, of medium length and
breadth, tapering, often single-shouldered, compact, frequently with
many abortive fruits. Berries of medium size, round-oval, black or
purplish-black with thin bloom, inclined to drop, soft; skin thick,
tough with a large amount of purplish-red pigment; flesh pale green,
juicy, stringy, mild, sweet from skin to center; fair in quality. Seeds
free, medium in size, notched, blunt, light brown, often covered with
grayish warts.
IvEs
(Labrusea, Aistivalis)
Ives’ Madeira, Ives’ Seedling, Kittredge
Ives has a high reputation as a grape for making red wine,
being surpassed only by Norton for this purpose. The vine
is hardy, healthy, vigorous and fruitful. The fruit is poor in
quality, colors long before ripe, has a foxy odor, and the flesh
is tough and pulpy. The bunches are compact, with well-
formed, jet-black grapes, which make them attractive. The
vine is easily propagated and is adapted to any good grape soil,
but is so rampant in growth that it is difficult to manage. The
variety is not widely cultivated. Ives was grown by Henry
Ives from seed planted in 1840 in his garden in Cincinnati,
Ohio.
Vine vigorous, hardy, healthy, productive. Canes long, thick,
reddish-brown with thin bloom; nodes enlarged, flattened ; internodes
short; tendrils continuous, bifid or trifid. Leaves large; upper
394 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
surface dark green, dull, rugose; lower surface pale green, pubescent ;
lobes three to five when present with terminal one acute; petiolar sinus
deep, narrow, sometimes closed and overlapping; basal sinus shallow ;
lateral sinus narrow; teeth shallow.
Fruit late mid-season, keeps well. Clusters large, tapering, fre-
quently single-shouldered, compact, often with numerous abortive
berries; pedicel slender with numerous small warts; brush short,
slender, pale with a reddish-brown tinge. Berries oval, jet-black with
heavy bloom, very persistent, firm; skin tough, adherent, wine-
colored pigment, astringent; flesh pale green, translucent, juicy, fine-
grained, tough, foxy; good. Seeds adherent, one to four, small, often
abortive, broad, short, blunt, plump, brown.
JAMES
(Rotundifolia)
James is one of the largest of the Rotundifolia grapes and
probably the best general-purpose variety of this species. The
vine is noted for vigor and productiveness. It cannot be grown
north of Maryland. It thrives in sandy loam soils with clay
subsoil. The variety was found by B. W. M. James, Pitt
County, North Carolina. It was introduced about 1890 and
was placed on the grape list of the American Pomological
Society fruit catalog in 1899.
Vine vigorous, healthy, productive. Canes slender, numerous,
long, slightly trailing. Leaves of medium size, thick, smooth, leathery,
cordate, as broad as long, with a serrate margin. Flowers open late;
stamens reflexed.
Fruit ripens late, hangs on the vine for three weeks, keeps well.
Clusters small, containing from four to twelve berries, irregular, loose.
Berries large, three-fourths to one and one-fourth inches in diameter,
round, blue-black, marked with specks; skin thick, tough. Pulp
juicy, sweet; good in quality.
J ANESVILLE
(Labrusea, Vulpina)
Endowed with a constitution enabling it to withstand cold
to which most other grapes succumb, Janesville has made a
VARIETIES OF GRAPES 395
place for itself in far northern localities. Moreover, the grapes
ripen early, being about the first to color although they are not
ripe until some time after coloring. The vine also is healthy,
vigorous and productive. The fruit, however, is worthless
when better sorts can be grown. The clusters and berries are
small, the grapes are pulpy, tough, seedy, have a thick skin and
a disagreeable acid taste. Janesville was grown by F. W.
Loudon, Janesville, Wisconsin, from chance seed planted in 1858.
Vine vigorous, hardy, healthy, productive. Canes spiny, numerous,
dark brown; nodes flattened; internodes long; tendrils intermittent
or continuous, long, bifid or trifid. Leaves small, thin; upper sur-
face glossy, smooth; lower surface pale green, lightly pubescent; leaf
usually not lobed with terminus acute; petiolar sinus narrow, often
closed and overlapping; basal and lateral sinuses lacking ; teeth shal-
low. Flowers self-fertile, open very early ; stamens upright.
Fruit early, keeps well. Clusters small, short, cylindrical, usually
single-shouldered, compact; pedicel short, slender, covered with small,
scattering warts; brush dark wine color. Berries round, dull black
with heavy bloom, persistent, firm; skin thick, tough, adherent with
dark wine-colored pigment, astringent; flesh pale reddish-green,
translucent, juicy, tough, coarse, vinous, acid; fair in quality. Seeds
adherent, one to six, large, broad, angular, blunt, dark brown.
JEFFERSON
(Labrusea, Vinifera)
Jefferson (Plate X XI) is an offspring of Concord crossed with
Iona, and resembles Concord in vigor, productiveness and
healthiness of vine, and Jona in color and quality of fruit. The
vine producesits fruit two weeks later than Concord and is not as
hardy, faults that debar it from taking high rank as a commer-
cial grape. Fortunately the vines yield readily to laying down
for winter protection so that even in commercial plantations it is
not difficult to prevent winter injury. The bunches of Jefferson
are large, well-formed, compact with berries of uniform size and
color. The flesh is firm yet tender, juicy with a rich, vinous
flavor and a delicate aroma which persists even after the ber-
396 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
ries have dried into raisins. The fruit ships and keeps well,
the berries adhering to the cluster and the fruit retaining its
freshness into late winter. Jefferson is widely distributed and
is well known by viticulturists in eastern America. It is not
particular as to localities, if the season be long and the climate
temperate, and thrives in all soils. The variety originated with
J. H. Ricketts, Newburgh, New York; it fruited first in 1874.
Vine vigorous, healthy, doubtfully hardy, productive. Canes
short, numerous, light to dark brown; nodes enlarged, round; inter-
nodes short; tendrils intermittent, short, bifid or trifid. Leaves
healthy ; upper surface light green, older leaves rugose; lower surface
pale green, strongly pubescent; leaf usually not lobed with terminus
acute; petiolar sinus narrow, sometimes closed and overlapping; basal
sinus usually absent; lateral sinus shallow, often a mere notch; teeth
regular, shallow. Flowers self-fertile, open late; stamens upright.
Fruit late, keeps and ships well. Clusters large, cylindrical, usually
single-shouldered, sometimes double-shouldered, compact; pedicel
short, slender with a few inconspicuous warts; brush long, slender,
pale yellowish-green. Berries medium in size, oval, light and dark red,
glossy with thin bloom, persistent, very firm; skin thick, tough, free,
slightly astringent ; flesh light green, translucent, juicy, coarse-grained,
tender, vinous; good to best. Seeds free, one to four, broad, short,
blunt, plump, brown.
JESSICA
(Labrusea, Vinifera)
Jessica is an early, hardy, green grape. The fruit is sweet,
rich, sprightly and almost free from foxiness, but is unattrac-
tive and does not keep well. The clusters and berries are
small, and the clusters are too loose for a good grape. Jessica
may be commended for earliness and hardiness and is, there-
fore, desirable, if at all, in northern regions. William H.
Read, Port Dalhousie, Ontario, grew Jessica from seed planted
some time between 1870 and 1880.
Vine medium in vigor, healthy, hardy, productive. Canes long,
thick, dark brown with red tinge; nodes enlarged, flattened; inter-
VARIETIES OF GRAPES 397
nodes short; tendrils continuous or intermittent, bifid or trifid.
Leaves small; upper surface dark green, glossy, often rugose; lower
surface pale green, very pubescent; lobes three; petiolar sinus narrow ;
teeth shallow, narrow. Flowers self-fertile, open in mid-season ;
stamens upright.
Fruit very early. Clusters small, slender, tapering, usually single-
shouldered. Berries small, round, light green, often tinged with yellow,
covered with thin bloom, persistent, soft; skin thin, adherent, faintly
astringent; flesh pale green, transparent, juicy, tender, soft, sprightly,
sweet; good. Seeds adherent, medium to broad, notched, brown.
JEWEL
(Labrusea, Bourquiniana, Vinifera)
The notable characters of Jewel are earliness and high quality
in fruit; although, as compared with Delaware, its parent, the
vine is vigorous, healthy and hardy. In form and size of bunch
and berry, Jewel closely resembles Delaware, but the grapes
are deep black in color. The flesh characters and flavor of the
fruit are much like those of Delaware, the pulp being tender
- yet firm, and the flavor having the same rich, sprightly, vinous
taste found in the parent. The seeds are few and small. The
skin is thin but tough, and the grapes ship well, keep long, do
not shell, and although early, hang until frost. Jewel is a
most excellent grape, worthy the place among black grapes that
Delaware has among red varieties. In particular, it is recom-
mended for earliness and for localities in the North where
standard varieties do not ripen. John Burr, Leavenworth,
Kansas, grew Jewel from seed of Delaware planted about 1874.
Vine vigorous, healthy, hardy, productive. Canes slender, light
reddish-brown; nodes enlarged, flattened; internodes short; tendrils
continuous, bifid. Leaves secant, thick; upper surface light green,
dull, rugose; lower surface tinged with bronze, heavily pubescent;
lobes three when present with terminus acute; petiolar sinus narrow;
basal sinus usually lacking; lateral sinus shallow, wide; teeth shallow.
Flowers self-sterile, open in mid-season; stamens reflexed.
Fruit early. Clusters small, slender, cylindrical, single-shouldered,
compact; pedicel short, slender; brush short, wine-colored. Berries
398 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
medium in size, round, dark purplish-black, dull with heavy bloom,
persistent, firm; skin thin, tough, adherent, wine-colored pigment ;
flesh pale green, translucent, juicy, fine-grained, tender, sprightly,
vinous, sweet; very good. Seeds adherent, one to four, frequently
one-sided, blunt, light brown.
KENSINGTON
(Vinifera, Vulpina)
Kensington has several very meritorious fruit and vine
characters. ‘The vine resembles that of Clinton, its Vulpina
parent, in vigor, hardiness, growth and productiveness, but
the fruit has many of the characters of the European parent,
Buckland Sweetwater. The grapes are yellowish-green, large,
oval and borne in loose clusters of medium size. In quality
the fruit of Kensington is not equal to that of Buckland Sweet-
water but is much better than that of Clinton. The flesh is
tender and juicy with a rich, sweet, vinous flavor. The hardi-
ness of the vine and the high quality of the fruit should make
Kensington a favorite green grape in northern gardens. This
variety was grown by William Saunders, London, Ontario.
It was sent out some time between 1870 and 1880.
Vine vigorous, hardy, productive. Canes long, slender, light
brown; nodes enlarged, flattened; internodes short; tendrils persist-
ent, intermittent or continuous, long, bifid or trifid. Leaves thin;
upper surface light green, glossy, smooth; lower surface pale green,
pubescent, hairy; lobes wanting or one to three with terminus obtuse;
petiolar sinus narrow; basal sinus shallow when present; lateral sinus
shallow, usually a notch; teeth deep and wide. Flowers self-fertile,
open early, stamens upright.
Fruit mid-season. Clusters large, cylindrical, often heavily single-
shouldered, loose, frequently with many undeveloped berries; pedicel
long and slender with small, inconspicuous warts; brush short, pale
green. Berries variable in size, oval, yellowish-green, glossy with
thin bloom, persistent, firm; skin thin, tough, adherent, faintly as-
tringent; flesh green, transparent, juicy, tender, vinous, sweet; good.
Seeds free, two to four, wrinkled, large, long, broad, sharp-pointed,
yellowish-brown.
VARIETIES OF GRAPES 399
KING
(Labrusea)
King is similar to Concord, compared with which the vine is
more vigorous and prolific, time of ripening and length of season
the same, the clusters are one-fourth larger, the grapes are more
persistent, the pulp is more tender, the flavor nearly the same
but more sprightly, the seeds fewer in number, the wood harder
and of shorter joints and the pedicels larger. King was found
in the Concord vineyard of W. K. Munson, Grand Rapids,
Michigan, in 1892. The vine was set for Concord and is sup-
posed to be a bud-sport of that variety.
Vine very vigorous, hardy, productive. Canes large, dark reddish-
brown; nodes enlarged, slightly flattened; internodes short; tendrils
continuous or intermittent, trifid or bifid. Leaves unusually large,
thick ; upper surface green, dull; lower surface grayish-white changing
to slight bronze, pubescent; lobes three when present, terminal one
acute; teeth shallow, narrow. Flowers self-fertile, open in mid-
season; stamens upright.
Fruit mid-season, keeps well. Clusters large, long, broad, irregu-
larly tapering, usually single-shouldered, compact. Berries large,
round, black with thin bloom, persistent, firm; skin thick, tough, ad-
herent, astringent; flesh pale green, very juicy, tough, stringy and
with some foxiness; good. Seeds adherent, few, large, short, broad,
lightly notched if at all, blunt, plump, light brown.
Lapy
(Labrusea, Vinifera)
The vine of Lady is much like that of Concord, its parent,
although not quite so vigorous nor productive, but ripens its
fruit fully two weeks earlier. The fruit is much superior to
that of Concord in quality, being richer, sweeter and less foxy.
The grapes hang on the vines well but deteriorate rapidly
after picking. The term, “ironclad,” used by grape-growers
to express hardiness and freedom from disease, is probably
as applicable to Lady as to any other of the Labrusca grapes.
400 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
The foliage is dense and of a deep glossy green, neither scald-
ing under a hot sun nor freezing until heavy frosts, making
it an attractive ornament in the garden. Lady is deservedly
popular as a grape for the amateur and should be planted for
nearby markets. It succeeds wherever Concord is grown, and
because of its early ripening is especially adapted to northern
latitudes where Concord does not always mature. Although
the fruit ripens early, the buds start late, often escaping late
spring frosts. When Lady was first heard of, it was in the
hands of a Mr. Imlay, Muskingum County, Ohio. George
W. Campbell, Delaware, Ohio, introduced it in 1874.
Vine vigorous, hardy, medium in productiveness, healthy. Canes
short, slender, dark reddish-brown ; nodes flattened ; internodes short ;
tendrils intermittent, bifid or trifid. Leaves medium in size; upper
surface light green, glossy, rugose; lower surface pale green, pubes-
cent; lobes one to five with terminal one acuminate; petiolar sinus
shallow, wide; lateral sinus variable in depth and width; teeth shallow.
Flowers self-fertile, open in mid-season; stamens upright.
Fruit early, does not keep well. Clusters small, short, slender,
cylindrical, sometimes single-shouldered, compact; pedicel thick,
smooth; brush slender, long, greenish-white. Berries large, round,
light green, often with a tinge of yellow, glossy with thin bloom,
persistent, firm; skin covered with small, scattering, dark dots, thin,
tender, adherent, astringent; flesh greenish-white, translucent, juicy,
tender, aromatic; very good. Seeds free, few, broad, light brown.
Lapy WASHINGTON
(Labrusea, Vinifera)
Lady Washington is in many respects a most excellent
grape but falls short in quality and does not excel in vine char-
acters. The grapes make a good appearance, keep and ship
well and are tender, juicy and sweet. The vines are luxuriant,
hardy, for a grape with Vinifera blood, and healthy although
slightly susceptible to mildew. As an exhibition grape, few
green varieties show better when grown with care than Lady
Washington. In the West and Southwest, the variety is said
Puare XXX.— Winchell (X 3).
i Sar ee Te
VARIETIES OF GRAPES 401
to succeed better than any other Concord seedling. Lady
Washington is another of J. H. Ricketts’ fine seedlings, this
variety having come from seed of Concord fertilized by Allen’s
Hybrid. It was introduced in 1878.
Vine vigorous, productive. Canes long, few, thick, dark brown;
nodes greatly enlarged, variable in shape; internodes long; tendrils
eontinuous, long, bifid or trifid. Leaves large, thick; upper surface
dark green, older leaves strongly rugose, glossy; lower surface pale
green, pubescent; leaf entire with terminal acute; petiolar sinus deep,
narrow, frequently closed and overlapping; basal sinus usually want-
ing; lateral sinus shallow; teeth shallow, narrow. Flowers self-
fertile, open in mid-season; stamens upright.
Fruit late mid-season, keeps and ships well. Clusters large, broad,
irregularly cylindrical, single-shouldered, frequently double-shouldered,
loose; pedicel short with numerous conspicuous warts; brush very
short, greenish. Berries variable in size, round-oblate, yellow-amber,
glossy with thin bloom, persistent; skin thin, tender, adherent; flesh
pale green, transparent, juicy and tender, stringy, aromatic, sweet;
very good. Seeds free, one to four, broad, brown.
LENOIR
(Bourquiniana)
Alabama, Black El Paso, Black July, Black Spanish, Blue
French, Burgundy, Cigar Box Grape, Devereaux, Jack,
Jacques, July Sherry, Longworth’s Ohio, MacCandless, Ohio,
Springstein, Warren
Lenoir is a tender southern grape which has been used largely
in France and California as a resistant stock and a direct
producer. The fruit is highly valued for its dark red wine and
is very good for table use. The vine is very resistant to phyl-
loxera and withstands drouth well. The origin of Lenoir is
unknown. It was in cultivation in the South as long ago as
the early part of the last century. Nicholas Herbemont
states in 1829 that its name was given from a man named
Lenoir who cultivated it near Stateburg, South Carolina.
2D
402 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
Vine vigorous, thrifty, semi-hardy, productive. Canes numerous,
with some bloom at the nodes; tendrils intermittent. Leaves from
two to seven-lobed, usually five, with characteristic bluish-green color
above and pale green below.
Clusters variable, medium to very large, tapering, usually shoul-
dered. Berries small, round, dark bluish-purple, nearly black with lilae
bloom; skin thick, tough; flesh juicy, tender, sweet, very rich in
coloring matter.
LigNan BLANC
(Vinifera)
White July, Lughenga, Joannene
At Geneva, New York, Lignan Blane ripens first of all
grapes, native or European. It is not of highest quality but
is better than any other early grape and makes a valuable
addition to the home vineyard. It is a favorite grape in Europe
and is rather commonly grown in California. This variety
offers excellent material for hybridization with native grapes.
Vine vigorous, medium productive; buds open early; opening
leaves light green, glossy, tinged with red along the edges, thinly
pubescent. Leaves medium in size, roundish, somewhat dull green,
slightly rugose ; lower surface glabrous; blade thick; lobes usually five
though sometimes three; petiolar sinus medium in depth, wide; lower
lateral sinus medium in depth, narrow; upper lateral sinus shallow, nar-
row; margin dentate; teeth long, narrow. Flowers appear early for a
Vinifera ; stamens upright.
Fruit ripens the first of September and is a good keeper; clusters
above medium in size, tapering, medium compact; berries medium to
large, oval, yellowish-green, with thin bloom; skin thin, tender,
neutral; flesh greenish-white, firm, juicy, meaty, sweet; quality good.
LINDLEY
(Labrusea, Vinifera)
By common consent, Lindley (Plate XXII) is the best of the
red grapes originated by Rogers in his crosses between La-
brusca and Vinifera. The bunches are of only medium size and
VARIETIES OF GRAPES 403
are loose, but the berries are well-formed, of uniform size and an
attractive dark red color. The flesh is firm, fine-grained, juicy,
tender with a peculiarly rich aromatic flavor. The skin is
thick and tough but js not objectionable in fruit fully ripe.
The fruit keeps and ships well, and the berries neither crack
nor shatter. The vine is vigorous, hardy for a Vinifera
hybrid, healthy but, as with most of its kind, susceptible to
mildew. The chief defects of Lindley are self-sterility, preca-
riousness in bearing and lack of adaptation to many soils.
Lindley is a general favorite in the garden. In 1869 Rogers
gave this grape its name in honor of John Lindley, the English
botanist.
Vine vigorous, usually hardy, susceptible to mildew. Canes very
long, dark reddish-brown with thin bloom; nodes enlarged, usually
flattened ; internodes long, thick; tendrils continuous, long, bifid or
trifid. Leaves large, thick; upper surface light green, dull, slightly
rugose; lower surface grayish-white, pubescent ; obscurely three-lobed
with terminus acute; petiolar sinus deep, narrow, often closed and
overlapping; teeth shallow. Flowers self-sterile, open in mid-season ;
stamens reflexed.
Fruit mid-season, keeps and ships well. Clusters long, broad,
cylindrical, frequently single-shouldered, the shoulder being connected
to the bunch by a long stem, loose; pedicel short, slender, smooth;
brush short, pale green. Berries large, round-oval, dark-red with
faint bloom; skin tough, adherent, unpigmented, strongly astringent ;
flesh pale green, translucent, juicy, fine-grained, tender, vinous;
good to best. Seeds adherent, two to five, notched, brown.
LUCILE
(Labrusea)
In vigor, health, hardiness and productiveness, Lucile (Plate
_ XXII) is not surpassed by any native grape. Unfortunately,
the fruit characters are not so desirable. The size, form and
color of bunches and berries are good, making a very attractive
fruit, but the grapes have an obnoxious, foxy taste and odor and
are pulpy and seedy. Lucilg is earlier than Concord, the crop
404 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
ripening with that of Worden or preceding it a few days.
For an early variety, the fruit keeps well and in spite of thin
skin ships well. The vine thrives in all grape soils. Lucile
may be recommended where a hardy grape is desired and for
localities in which the season is short. J. A. Putnam, Fredonia,
New York, grew Lucile. The vine fruited first in 1890. It is
a seedling of Wyoming, which it resembles in fruit and vine
and surpasses in both.
Vine vigorous, hardy, very productive. Canes long, light brown;
nodes enlarged, flattened; internodes short; tendrils continuous, bifid
or trifid. Leaves large, firm; upper surface light green, glossy,
smooth; lower surface pale green, pubescent; leaf with terminus acute;
petiolar sinus shallow, narrow, sometimes closed and overlapping ;
basal sinus usually absent; lateral sinus a notch when present; teeth
shallow. Flowers self-fertile, open early ; stamens upright.
Fruit early, keeps well. Clusters large, long, slender, eylindrieal,
usually single-shouldered, very compact; pedicel short, thick with
few, small, inconspicuous warts; brush light brown. Berries large,
round, dark red with thin bloom, persistent, firm; skin thin, tender,
astringent; flesh pale green, translucent, juicy, tough, stringy, foxy ;
fair in quality. Seeds adherent, one to four, small, broad, short,
blunt, dark brown.
LUTIE
(Labrusea)
Lutie (Plate XXIII) is chiefly valuable for its vine characters.
The vines are vigorous, hardy, healthy and fruitful, although
scarcely equaling Lucile in any of these characters. Pomologists
differ widely as to the merits of the fruit, some claiming high
quality for it and others declaring that it is no better than a
wild Labrusca. The difference of opinion is due to a pecul-
larity of the fruit; if eaten fresh, the quality, while far from
being of the best, is not bad, but after being picked for several
days it develops so much foxiness of flavor and aroma that
it is scarcely edible. Lutie is a seedling found by L. C.
Chisholm, Spring Hill, Tennessee. It was introduced in 1885.
VARIETIES OF GRAPES 405
Vine vigorous, hardy, healthy, productive. Canes short, slender,
dark reddish-brown; nodes enlarged; internodes short; tendrils
continuous, short, bifid. Leaves medium in size; upper surface dark
green, rugose; lower surface bronze or whitish-green, pubescent ; leaf
usually not lobed with terminus acute; petiolar sinus deep, wide;
basal sinus lacking; lateral sinus shallow and narrow when present ;
teeth shallow, narrow. Flowers self-fertile, early; stamens upright.
Fruit early, does not keep well. Clusters medium in size, short,
broad, blunt, cylindrical, usually not shouldered, compact; pedicel
short with small, seattering warts; brush slender, pale green. Berries
large, round, dark red, dull with thin bloom, drop badly from pedicel,
firm; skin tender, adherent, astringent; flesh pale green, translucent,
juicy, tough, foxy; fair in quality. Seeds adherent, one to four,
large, broad, short and blunt, dark brown.
MALAGA
(Vinifera)
Malaga is one of the favorite table-grapes in California and
also a popular grape to ship to eastern markets. In some
parts of southern California, where the Muscats do not thrive,
it is much grown, and in the San Joaquin Valley it is rather
largely used in making raisins. It requires a long season and
probably could not be grown in eastern regions except in the
most favored localities. The description is compiled.
Vine very vigorous, healthy and productive; wood reddish-brown,
short-jointed. Leaves of medium size, smooth, leathery ; light glossy
green above, lighter below; deeply lobed. Bunches very large, long,
loose, shouldered, sometimes scraggly ; stem long and flexible; berries
very large, oval, yellowish-green, covered with light bloom; skin
thick; flesh firm, crisp, sweet and rich; quality good. Season late,
keeps and ships well.
McPIKE
(Labrusea)
McPike is noteworthy because of the large size of the berries
and bunches. It is very similar to its parent, Worden, differ-
406 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
ing in having fewer but larger berries, grapes not as high in
flavor and fewer and smaller seeds.. Because of the thin, tender
skin, the berries crack badly. The grapes shell more or less,
and the vines are less productive than those of Worden. The
faults named debar it from becoming a commercial grape
and it is not high enough in quality to make it of value for
the amateur. This variety originated with H. G. McPike,
Alton, Il!inois, from seed of Worden planted in 1890.
Vine vigorous, hardy, very productive. Canes of medium length,
dull reddish-brown; nodes enlarged, flattened; internodes very
short; tendrils continuous, bifid or trifid. Leaves large, thick;
upper surface light green, dull, rugose; lower surface grayish-white,
heavily pubescent; leaf entire with terminus acute; petiolar sinus
deep; basal and lateral sinuses lacking. Flowers nearly self-fertile.
Fruit mid-season, keeps well. Clusters variable in size, broad,
irregularly tapering, usually not shouldered; pedicel long, thick,
smooth; brush long, slender, green with brown tinge. Berries unusu-
ally large, round, purplish-black with heavy bloom, firm; skin eracks,
adherent to pulp, astringent; flesh pale green, translucent, juicy,
tender, stringy, vinous; fair to good. Seeds adherent, one to four,
short, broad, blunt, plump, light brown.
MARION
(Vulpina, Labrusea)
Black German, Marion Port
Marion so closely resembles Clinton in botanical and horti-
cultural characters as to be clearly of the same type. The
vine is vigorous and hardy, but hardly sufficiently productive,
and is susceptible to mildew and leaf-hoppers. The fruit
is pleasantly sweet and spicy, although not high enough in
quality for a table-grape, but makes a very good dark red wine.
The fruit colors early but ripens late, hangs well on the vines
and improves with a touch of frost. Marion was brought
to notice by a Mr. Shepherd, Marion, Ohio, about 1850.
VARIETIES OF GRAPES 407
Vine vigorous, hardy, productive. Canes very long, dark reddish-
brown, covered with bloom; nodes enlarged, flattened; internodes
very long; tendrils continuous, sometimes intermittent, long, bifid.
Leaves very large; upper surface dark green, glossy; lower surface
pale green, smooth; leaf entire, terminus acuminate; petiolar sinus
very deep, narrow, often closed and overlapping; basal and lateral
sinuses usually lacking; teeth shallow, wide. Flowers self-sterile,
open very early; stamens reflexed.
Fruit mid-season, keeps well. Clusters medium in size, short,
slender, cylindrical, single-shouldered, compact; pedicel short, slender
with a few inconspicuous warts; brush very short, wine-colored.
Berries small, round, black, glossy with heavy bloom, persistent, firm ;
skin thin, tough, adherent with much wine-colored pigment, astrin-
gent; flesh dark green, translucent, juicy, fine-grained, tough, sprightly,
spicy, tart; fair in quality. Seeds adherent, one to five, medium in
size, broad, short, very plump, brown.
MartTHa
(Labrusea, Vinifera)
Martha was at one time a popular green grape, but the
introduction of superior varieties has reduced its popularity
until now it is but little grown. It is a seedling of Concord
and resembles its parent, differing chiefly as follows: fruit
green, a week earlier, bunch and berry smaller, flavor far
better, being sweeter, more delicate and less foxy. The vine
of Martha is a lighter shade of green, is less robust, and the
blossoms open a few days earlier than those of Concord. One
of the defects of Martha, and the chief cause of its going out
of favor, is that it does not keep nor ship well. The variety
is still being planted in the South but is generally abandoned
in the North. Samuel Miller, Calmdale, Pennsylvania, grew
Martha from seed of Concord; it was introduced about 1868.
Vine hardy, productive, susceptible to attacks of mildew. Canes
long, dark reddish-brown, surface with thin bloom, roughened ; nodes
enlarged, slightly flattened ; tendrils continuous, or intermittent, bifid.
Leaves large, thick; upper surface light green; lower surface light
408 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
bronze, heavily pubescent; lobes wanting or faint; petiolar sinus
shallow, very wide; teeth irregular. Flowers self-fertile, open in
mid-season ; stamens upright.
Fruit early mid-season. Clusters medium in size, tapering, single-
shouldered, loose; pedicel short, slender; brush very short, green.
Berries medium in size, round, light green with thin bloom, persistent ;
skin thin, very tender, adherent; flesh pale green, Juicy, tough, fine-
grained, slightly foxy; very good. Seeds few in number, adherent,
broad, blunt, dark brown.
MASssaASsoIr
(Labrusea, Vinifera)
Massasoit is distinguished as the earliest of Rogers’ hybrids,
ripening with Delaware. The grapes have the peculiarity
of being best before full maturity, developing, after ripening,
a degree of foxiness which impairs the quality. In shape and
size of berry and bunch, there is a striking resemblance to
Isabella, but the color is that of Catawba. The texture of
the fruit is especially good, firm but tender and juicy, while
the flavor is rich and sweet. The vine is vigorous, hardy and
productive but subject to mildew and rot. Massasoit is worth
a place in the home vineyard and as an early grape of fine
quality for local markets.
Vine very vigorous, hardy, very productive, subject to rot and
mildew. Canes long, thick, dark brown with reddish tinge; nodes
enlarged, flattened; tendrils continuous, long, trifid or bifid. Leaves
variable in size; upper surface light green, dull, smooth; lower sur-
face pale green, pubescent; lobes three to five with terminus acute;
petiolar sinus deep, narrow; basal sinus shallow, narrow, obscure ;
teeth shallow. Flowers self-sterile, open late; stamens reflexed.
Fruit early, keeps well. Clusters variable in size, broad, eylin-
drical, frequently single-shouldered ; pedicel slender with a few in-
distinct warts; brush pale green. Berries large, round-oval, dark
brownish-red, dull with thin bloom, very persistent, firm; skin thin,
tender, adherent, astringent; flesh pale green, translucent, juicy,
fine-grained, soft, stringy, foxy; good to very good. Seeds adherent,
one to five, large, broad, distinctly notched, plump, blunt.
VARIETIES OF GRAPES 409
MAXATAWNEY
(Labrusea, Vinifera)
While at one time very popular, grape-growers now seldom
hear of Maxatawney. It is a southern grape, ripening its
fruit in the North only occasionally. The variety is interesting
historically as being the first good green grape and as showing
unmistakable Vinifera characters, another example of the
fortuitous hybridization which gave so many valuable varieties
before artificial hybridization of Vinifera with native grapes
had been tried. In 1843, a man living in Eagleville, Pennsyl-
vania, received several bunches of grapes from Maxatawney.
The seeds of these grapes were planted and one grew, the result-
ing plant being the original vine of Maxatawney.
Vine vigorous, doubtfully hardy, variable in productiveness.
Canes medium in length, slender, reddish; nodes enlarged, flattened ;
internodes short; tendrils continuous, bifid. Leaves large, dark
green, thick; lower surface grayish-white with tinge of bronze, heavily
pubescent; lobes three to five; petiolar sinus narrow; teeth shallow.
Flowers self-sterile, open in mid-season; stamens upright.
Fruit late, keeps well. Clusters small to medium, short, slender,
cylindrical, occasionally with a small, single shoulder, compact;
pedicel long, slender, warty; brush long, yellow. Berries variable in
size, oval, pale red or dull green with amber tinge, with thin bloom,
persistent; skin tough, astringent; flesh tender, foxy; good to very
good. Seeds free, few, large, very broad, blunt.
Memory
(Rotundifolia)
Memory is one of the best of the Rotundifolia grapes for
the garden and local markets, its fruits being especially good
for dessert. As yet, however, the variety has not been widely
distributed even in North Carolina where it originated. The
vine is given credit for being the most vigorous grower and
the most productive of the grapes of its species. Memory
is probably a seedling of Thomas, which it much resembles,
410 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
having been found in a vineyard of Thomas grapes near White-
ville, North Carolina, by T. 5S. Memory, about 1868.
Vine very vigorous, healthy, productive. Leaves large, longer
than broad, thick, smooth with coarsely serrate margins. Flowers
perfect.
Fruit ripens in September in North Carolina; clusters large, with
from four to twelve berries which hang unusually well for a variety of
V. Rotundifolia. Berries very large, round-oblong, deep brownish-
black, almost jet black; skin thick; flesh tender, juicy, sweet; good
to best.
MERRIMAC
(Labrusea, Vinifera)
Merrimac is often accredited as the best black grape among
Rogers’ hybrids, but an analysis of the characters of the several
black varieties grown by Rogers shows that it is surpassed
by Wilder, Herbert and possibly Barry. The vine is strong
in growth, productive, hardy and exempt from fungal diseases ;
but the grapes are not high in quality, and flesh, skin and
seed characters are such that the fruit is not as pleasant to
eat as the other black varieties named. Merrimac is worthy
a place in collections for the sake of variety. Rogers gave this
variety the name Merrimac in 1869.
Vine vigorous, usually hardy, productive. Canes slender, dark
brown, surface roughened; nodes enlarged, flattened; internodes
short; tendrils intermittent, short, bifid. Leaves large, thin; upper
surface very light green, glossy, smooth; lower surface pale green,
pubescent and cobwebby; lobes three with terminal one obtuse;
petiolar sinus deep, narrow, sometimes closed and overlapping; basal
sinus usually lacking; lateral sinus shallow, narrow; teeth shallow.
Flowers self-sterile, open in mid-season; stamens reflexed.
Fruit mid-season, keeps and ships well. Clusters variable in size,
broad, tapering; pedicel slender, covered with numerous inconspicuous .
warts; brush wine-colored. Berries large, round, black, glossy with
abundant bloom, persistent, firm; skin thick, tough, adherent, astrin-
gent; flesh light green, translucent, juicy, fine-grained, tender, stringy ;
good. Seeds adherent, one to five, broad, long, with enlarged neck,
brown.
VARIETIES OF GRAPES 411
MILLS
(Labrusea, Vinifera)
The bunches and berries of Mills are large and well-formed ;
the berries are firm and solid, with the skin adherent as in Vi-
niferas; the flesh is juicy and parts readily from the seeds; the
flavor is rich, sweet and vinous; and the grapes are hardly
surpassed in keeping quality. But when the fruit characters
of Mills have been praised, nothing further can be said in its
favor. The vines are neither vigorous, hardy nor fruitful and
are very subject to mildew; neither wood nor roots ripen well
in the North in average seasons; and the variety is a most
difficult one for nurserymen to grow. Mills is of doubtful
commercial value, but for the garden it is possible that the
grower may be able to graft it to advantage on some variety
with better vine characters. William H. Mills, Hamilton,
Ontario, grew Mills about 1870 from seed of Muscat Hamburg
fertilized by Creveling.
Vine medium in vigor, hardiness and productiveness. Canes long,
thick, light brown; nodes enlarged, flattened; tendrils intermittent,
bifid or trifid. Leaves large, thick; upper surface dark green, dull,
rugose; lower surface pale green, cobwebby ; lobes three to five with
terminus acute; petiolar sinus intermediate in depth and width; basal
and lateral sinuses deep and wide; teeth deep. Flowers self-fertile,
open in mid-season; stamens upright.
Fruit mid-season, keeps well. Clusters large, long, slender, cy-
lindrical, often double-shouldered, compact; pedicel slender with nu-
merous, small warts; brush long, wine-colored. Berries large, oval,
jet-black with abundant bloom, persistent, firm; skin thick, tough,
adherent; flesh light green, translucent, juicy, rich, tender, sprightly,
vinous, sweet; very good to best. Seeds free, one to three, large, brown.
Mitsu
(Rotundifolia)
Mish is a favorite Rotundifolia in North Carolina, being
planted extensively in some parts of that state. Its outstand-
412 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
ing characters are vigor and productiveness in vine and high
quality in the fruit. Mish is named by many as the best all-
round Rotundifolia, being of value for dessert, wine and grape-
juice. The variety was found by W. M. Mish, about 1846,
near Washington, North Carolina.
Vine very vigorous, productive, healthy, open in growth; canes
somewhat trailing. Leaves large, round, thick, smooth, leathery with
coarsely dentate margin. Flowers perfect.
Fruit late, does not ripen uniformly, keeps and ships well. Clusters
of medium size with from six to fifteen berries which cling well to the
pedicel. Berries of medium size, round-oval, deep reddish-black
with numerous conspicuous dots; skin thin, cracking in wet weather ;
flesh tender, juicy, sweet, exceptionally well flavored; very good to
best.
MIsston
(Vinifera)
Of all grapes, Mission has probably played the most impor-
tant part in the vineyards of California. Grown from the
earliest times at the old missions, its source or its name has
never been determined. Its viticultural value for table and
Wine-press was early appreciated by California grape-growers,
and its culture rapidly spread to every county in the state
adapted to grape-growing. With vines vigorous, healthy and
productive, bearing grapes of delicious quality, Mission is
a mainstay on the Pacific slope, surpassed by few vineyard
varieties for general usefulness. The description is compiled.
Vine vigorous, healthy, productive; wood short-jointed, grayish-
brown, dull, dark. Leaf medium to large, slightly oblong, with large,
deeply-cut compound teeth; basal sinus widely opened, primary
sinuses narrow and shallow; smooth on both sides with scattered
tomentum below, bright green above, lighter below. Bunch divided
into many small, distinct lateral clusters, shouldered, loose, sometimes
very loose; berries of medium size, purple or almost black with heavy
bloom; skin thin; flesh firm, crisp, juicy, sweet, rich and delicious.
Seeds rather large and prominent; season late,
VARIETIES OF GRAPES 413
Missourr RIEesLINnG
(Vulpina, Labrusea)
Missouri Riesling attains perfection only in the South.
The vines are hardy, vigorous, productive and healthy in the
North, as a rule, but the fruit is lacking in quality. In the
South, Missouri Riesling is a beautiful fruit when well grown
and has many good qualities of fruit and vine. It originated
with Nicholas Grein, Hermann, Missouri, about 1870, probably
from seed of Taylor.
Vine vigorous, hardy, productive. Canes very long, numerous,
thick, dark brown; nodes enlarged; internodes long; tendrils contin-
uous, long, trifid or bifid. Leaves large, thick; upper surface dark
green, glossy, smooth; lower surface pale green, thinly pubescent ;
lobes five with terminal one acuminate; petiolar sinus deep, narrow;
basal sinus shallow, wide; lateral sinus deep, wide; teeth deep, wide.
Flowers self-fertile, open in mid-season; stamens upright.
Fruit late, does not keep nor ship well. Clusters short, eylin-
drical, single-shouldered; pedicel long with few small warts; brush
green. Berries of medium size, round, yellowish-green changing to
light red with thin bloom, persistent, firm; skin sprinkled with small
brown dots, thin, tough, adherent, astringent; flesh pale green, trans-
lucent, juicy, tender, fine-grained, lacking in aroma, mild; fair in
quality. Seeds adherent, one to four, surface rough, dark brown.
MONTEFIORE
(Vulpina, Labruseca)
Montefiore is extensively grown in Missouri and the South-
west but is almost unknown in the North and East. It is
reported as succeeding in the Lake District of Ohio and, with
the exception that it is uncertain in bearing and not always
productive, it grows well in sections of New York. While it
is essentially a wine-grape, yet it is pleasing in taste and texture
of fruit and is far better in quality than many of the coarser
Labruscas commonly cultivated. It keeps and ships well
414 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
and presents an attractive appearance. Jacob Rommel,
Morrison, Missouri, grew this variety about 1875 from seed
of Taylor fertilized by Ives.
Vine vigorous and hardy. Canes long, thick, dark brown with thin
bloom; nodes enlarged, flattened; internodes long; tendrils contin-
uous, long, bifid. Leaves thick; upper surface light green, dull,
smooth; lower surface grayish-white, pubescent; lobes three when
present with terminus acute; petiolar sinus wide; basal sinus lacking ;
lateral sinus shallow when present; teeth deep. Flowers semi-fertile,
open in mid-season; stamens upright.
Fruit mid-season, keeps well. Clusters small, short, tapering,
single-shouldered, the shoulder being connected to the buneh by a long
stem, compact; pedicel short, slender, smooth; brush red. Berries
small, oval, often compressed, black, glossy with abundant bloom, per-
sistent, firm; skin thin, tough, adherent, astringent; flesh green,
translucent, juicy, fine-grained, tender, melting, vinous, sweet; fair
to good. Seeds free, one to five, small, broad, faintly notched, short,
plump, brown.
Moore EArty
(Labrusea)
Moore Early (Plate X XIV) is the standard grape of its season.
Its fruit cannot be described better than as an early Concord.
The vines are readily distinguishable from those of Concord,
differing chiefly in being less productive. To grow the variety
satisfactorily, the soil must be rich, well-drained and loose,
must be frequently cultivated, and the vines should be pruned
severely. The bunches of Moore Early are not as large as
those of Concord and are less compact; the berries shell rather
more easily, and the skin cracks more readily. The
flesh characters and the flavor are essentially those of Con-
cord, although the quality is not as high as in the older variety.
The quality is, however, much higher than that of Champion
and Hartford, its chief competitors, and varieties which it
should replace. Moore Early is by no means an ideal grape
for its season, but until something better is introduced it will
probably remain the best early commercial sort. Captain
VARIETIES OF GRAPES A415
John B. Moore, Concord, Massachusetts, originated this vari-
ety from seed of Concord, planted about 1868.
Vine vigorous, hardy, unproductive. Canes short, dark reddish-
brown; nodes enlarged, flattened; internodes short; tendrils contin-
uous, bifid or trifid. Leaves large, thick; upper surface dark green,
dull; lower surface tinged with bronze, heavily pubescent; leaf
usually not lobed, terminus acute; petiolar sinus wide; basal sinus
lacking; lateral sinus a notch when present; teeth shallow, narrow.
Flowers fertile, open in mid-season; stamens upright.
Fruit early, does not keep well. Clusters medium in size, length,
and breadth, cylindrical, sometimes single-shouldered, loose; pedicel
short, thick, smooth; brush short, pale green. Berries large, round,
purplish-black, firm; skin tender, adherent; flesh green, translucent,
juicy, fine-grained, tough with slight foxiness; fair to good. Seeds
one to four, large, broad, plump, blunt, brown with yellow tinge at tips.
MoscaTELLo
(Vinifera)
Moscatello Nero. Black Muscat
Beautiful in appearance and having a delicate Muscat
taste and aroma, this variety is one of the good table-grapes of
the Pacific slope. Unfortunately it ripens so late that it is
hardly worth trying in the East. The variety has the reputa-
tion of being very productive. The description is compiled.
Vine vigorous, healthy, very productive. Leaves of medium size,
with deep upper and shallow lower sinuses; glabrous above, slightly
downy below, very hairy on the veins, with long, sharp teeth. Bunch
large to very large, long, loose, conico-cylindrical, winged; berries
very large, borne on long slender pedicels, dark purple, almost black ;
skin thin but tough; flesh rather soft, juicy; flavor sweet, rich,
aromatic, musky; quality very good. Season late, does not keep well.
Moyer
(Labrusea, Bourquiniana)
Jordan, Moyer’s Early Red
Moyer is almost a counterpart of its parent, Delaware.
Were it not that the variety is from one to two weeks earlier
416 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
than Delaware, and somewhat hardier, hence better adapted
for cold regions, it could have no place in viticulture. Com-
pared with Delaware, the vine is hardly as vigorous and is
less productive, but is freer from rot and mildew. The bunches
are much like those of Delaware but have the fault of setting
fruit imperfectly even when cross-pollination is assured; the
berries are a little larger, of much the same color and of like
flavor, rich, sweet, with pure vinousness and without a trace
of foxiness. The fruit keeps well, ships well and does not crack
nor shell. Moyer is well established in Canada, proving per-
fectly hardy wherever Concord is grown, possibly standing
even more cold. W. H. Read, Port Dalhousie, Ontario,
raised the original vine of Moyer, about 1880, from seed of
Delaware fertilized by Miller’s Burgundy.
Vine vigorous, hardy, healthy, unproductive. Canes numerous,
slender, dull, dark reddish-brown; nodes enlarged, flattened; inter-
nodes short; tendrils continuous, long, bifid or trifid. Leaves small ;
upper surface dark green, dull, smooth; lower surface pale green or with
faint blue tinge, heavily pubescent; lobes two to five with terminus
acute; petiolar sinus shallow; basal sinus shallow when present ;
lateral sinus shallow, narrow; teeth very shallow, narrow. Flowers
self-sterile, open early ; stamens reflexed.
Fruit early, keeps well but loses color if kept too long. Clusters
small, short, slender, tapering, sometimes single-shouldered ; pedicel
short with small warts; brush yellowish-green. Berries small, oblate,
dark red with faint bloom, persistent, firm; skin tough, free, astrin-
gent; flesh translucent, juicy, tender, fine-grained, vinous; good to
very good. Seeds free, one to four, broad, short, very blunt, brown
with yellow tinge at tips.
MuscaTEL
(Vinifera)
White Frontignan
This old and standard sort is rather commonly grown in
some of the grape regions of California to follow Chasselas
PLate XXXI.— Worden (X3)-
at)
7
VARIETIES OF GRAPES 417
Golden. It might be tried with some show of success in favored
grape regions in the East. The description is compiled.
Vine of medium size, vigorous, healthy; canes strong, spreading,
reddish-brown with short internodes. Leaves of medium size, thin,
five-lobed; glabrous except on the lower sides of the well-marked ribs
where a few hairs show. Bunches long, cylindrical, regular, compact ;
berries round, golden-yellow becoming amber; flavor sweet, rich,
aromatic, peculiar; quality very good. Season late mid-season, keeps
and ships well.
Muscat HAMBURG
(Vinifera)
Muscat Hamburg (Plate X XV) is an old European grape well
known in some parts of America in greenhouse graperies, since
it is one of the best for forcing. All who know the beautiful
fruits of this variety grown in forecing-houses will want to test
it out of doors, where at the Geneva, New York, Experiment
Station, they have done well, many clusters attaining a
weight of a pound anda half to two pounds. The accom-
panying plate, the fruit much less than half natural size,
shows what a fine grape Muscat Hamburg is. One is struck
with wondering admiration at a vine laden with these grapes
growing alongside Concord, Niagara or Delaware. The quality
is delectable, the quintessence of the flavors and aromas which
make the grape a favorite fruit. The grapes keep long and
retain their form, size, color and rich, delicate flavor almost to
the end. This variety is a treasure to the amateur; and the
professional who wants another grape for local markets should
try grafting over a few vines of some native to this sort, fol-
lowing the directions given in Chapter X in caring for the
vines.
Vines vigorous, tender, need protection during the winter; canes
long, numerous, slender to medium, light brown, darker at the nodes
which are enlarged and flattened. Leaves medium to large, inter-
mediate in thickness; upper surface light green, dull; lower surface
pale green, faintly pubescent, densely hairy.
25
418 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
Fruit ripens in October, ships and keeps well; clusters very
large, long, broad, tapering, single or double-shouldered. Berries large,
firm, oval, very dark purplish-red, covered with lilac bloom, very
persistent; skin thick, adheres strongly to the pulp; flesh pale green,
translucent, meaty, very juicy, tender, vinous, musky, sweet, rich ; very
good to best; seeds separating easily from the pulp, large.
Muscat oF ALEXANDRIA
This is possibly the leading table- and raisin-grape of the
Pacific slope. From the literature or from a visit to vineyards,
one cannot make out whether one or several varieties are grown
under the name. Probably there are several strains grown under
the distinctive name “Muscat” which applies to these sweet,
light yellow, musky grapes. This is one of the standard
sorts to force indoors but requires too long a season for out of
doors in the East. The following description is compiled :
Vine short, straggling, bushy, sometimes forming a bush rather
than a vine, very productive; wood gray with dark spots, short-
jointed. Leaf round, five-lobed; bright green above, lighter green
below. Bunches long and loose, shouldered; berry oblong, light
yellow and transparent when fully mature, covered with white bloom ;
flesh firm, crisp; flavor sweet and very musky; quality good. Season
late, the laterals producing a second and sometimes even a third crop.
NIAGARA
(Labrusea, Vinifera)
Niagara (Plate XXVI) is the leading American green grape,
holding the rank among grapes of this color that Concord main-
tains among black varieties. It is, however, a less valuable
grape than Concord, and it is doubtful whether it should be
ranked much higher than several other green grapes. In vigor
and productiveness, when the two grapes are on equal footing as
to adaptability, Niagara and Concord rank the same. In hardi-
ness of root and vine, Niagara falls short of Concord; it cannot
VARIETIES OF GRAPES 419
be relied on without winter protection where the thermometer
falls below zero. Niagara has much of the foxiness of the
wild Labrusea, distasteful to many palates. Both bunches
and berries of Niagara are larger than those of Concord and
are better formed, making a handsomer fruit if the colors are
liked equally well. The fruit shells as badly as that of Con-
cord and does not keep longer. Both vine and fruit of Niagara
are more susceptible to fungal diseases than those of Concord,
especially to black-rot, which proves a veritable scourge with
this variety in unfavorable seasons. Niagara was produced
by C. L. Hoag and B. W. Clark, Lockport, New York, from
seed of Concord fertilized by Cassady planted in 1868.
Vine vigorous, lacking in hardiness, very productive. Canes long,
thick, reddish-brown deepening in color at the nodes which are enlarged
and slightly flattened; internodes long, thick; tendrils continuous,
long, bifid or trifid. Leaves large, thick; upper surface glossy, dark
green, smooth; lower surface pale green, pubescent; lobes three to
five with terminus acute; petiolar sinus of medium depth and width;
basal sinus shallow, wide, often toothed; lateral sinus wide, frequently
toothed; teeth shallow, variable in width. Flowers self-fertile, open
in mid-season; stamens upright.
Fruit mid-season, keeps well. Clusters large, long, broad, tapering,
frequently single-shouldered, compact; pedicel thick with a few,
small, inconspicuous warts; brush pale green, long. Berries large,
oval, pale yellowish-green with thin bloom, persistent, firm; skin thin,
tender, adherent, astringent; flesh light green, translucent, juicy,
fine-grained, tender, foxy; good. Seeds free, one to six, deeply
notched, brown.
Noau
(Vulpina, Labrusea)
Noah is little grown at present outside of Missouri, where
it is still planted somewhat. Noah and Elvira are often con-
fused but there are very marked differences. The clusters of
Elvira are smaller, the berries are more foxy in taste, and the
skins are more tender and crack more readily than do those of
Noah. The large, dark, glossy green leaves make the vines of
420 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
this variety very handsome. As with Elvira and other varieties
of this group, Noah is of little value in the North. It origi-
nated with Otto Wasserzieher, Nauvoo, Illinois, from seed of
Taylor planted in 1869.
Vine vigorous, doubtfully hardy, productive. Canes long, thick,
dark brown, surface roughened; nodes enlarged, flattened; tendrils
continuous, bifid or trifid. Leaves large; upper surface dark green,
glossy, smooth; lower surface pale green, thinly pubescent; leaf
usually not lobed with terminus acuminate; petiolar sinus deep, wide;
basal sinus lacking; lateral sinus very shallow when present; teeth
shallow, wide. Flowers semi-fertile, open early; stamens upright.
Fruit late mid-season, does not ship nor keep well. Clusters variable
in size, cylindrical, single-shouldered, compact; pedicel short with a
few small warts; brush short, brown. Berries small, round, light
green tinged with yellow, dull with thin bloom, firm; skin adherent to
pulp; flesh yellowish-green, translucent, Juicy, tough, fine-grained,
vinous, sprightly; good. Seeds adherent, one to four, dark brown.
NORTHERN MUSCADINE
(Labrusea)
That this variety, together with Lucile, Lutie and other
grapes with the foxy taste strongly marked, has not become
popular, in spite of good vine characters, is evidence that the
American public do not desire such grapes. In appearance of
fruit, Northern Muscadine is much like Lutie, the two being
distinguished from other grapes by an unmistakable odor. A
serious defect of the fruit is that the berries shatter badly as
soon as they reach maturity. Taken as a whole, the vine
characters of this variety are very good and offer possibilities
for the grape-breeder. The variety originated at New Lebanon,
New York, and was brought to notice by D. J. Hawkins and
Philemon Stewart of the Society of Shakers about 1852.
Vine vigorous, productive, healthy, hardy. Canes slender, dark
brown, heavily pubescent; tendrils continuous, bifid, dehisece early.
Leaves large, round, thick; upper surface dull, rugose; lower surface
VARIETIES OF GRAPES 421
dark bronze, heavily pubescent. Flowers self-fertile, open in mid-
season; stamens upright.
Fruit early mid-season, does not keep well. Clusters medium in
size, short, occasionally single-shouldered, compact. Berries large,
oval, dark amber with thin bloom, drop badly from the pedicel; skin
tough, adherent, astringent; flesh pale green, juicy, fine-grained,
tender, soft, very foxy, sweet; poor in quality. Seeds free, numerous,
large, broad, faintly notched, long, brown.
NORTON
(Astivalis, Labrusea)
Norton is one of the leading wine-grapes in eastern America,
the fruit having small value for any other purpose than wine
or, possibly, grape-juice. The vine is hardy but requires a
long, warm season to reach maturity so that it is seldom grown
successfully north of the Potomac. Norton thrives in rich
alluvial clays, gravels or sands, the only requisite seemingly
being a fair amount of fertility and soil warmth. The vines
are robust; very productive, especially on fertile soils; as free,
or more so, from fungal diseases as any other of our native
grapes; and are very resistant to phylloxera. The bunches are
of but medium size and the berries are small. The grapes are
pleasant eating when fully ripe, rich, spicy and pure-flavored
but tart if not quite ripe. The variety is difficult to propagate
from cuttings and to transplant, and the vines do not bear
grafts well. The origin of Norton is uncertain, but it has been
under cultivation since before 1830, when it was first described.
Vine very vigorous, healthy, half-hardy, productive. Canes long,
thick, dark brown with abundant bloom; nodes much enlarged ; inter-
nodes. long; tendrils intermittent, occasionally continuous, long,
bifid, sometimes trifid. Leaves large, irregularly round ; upper surface
pale green, dull, rugose; lower surface pale green, pubescent; leaf
usually not lobed with terminus acute; petiolar sinus deep, narrow,
sometimes closed and overlapping; basal sinus usually absent; lateral
sinus shallow or a mere notch when present. Flowers self-fertile,
late; stamens upright,
422 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
Fruit late, keeps well. Clusters medium in size, short, broad,
tapering, single-shouldered, compact; pedicel slender with a few warts;
brush dull, wine-colored. Berries small, round-oblate, black, glossy
with heavy bloom, persistent, soft; skin thin, free with much dark red
pigment; flesh green, translucent, juicy, tender, spicy, tart. Seeds
free, two to six, small, brown.
Oporto
(Vulpina, Labrusca)
Oporto was at one time in demand as a wine grape because
its wine resembled in color and flavor that from Oporto. The
variety is now scarcely known, being inferior in most of its hor-
ticultural characters to others of its species, but might be valu-
able in breeding for some of its characters. The vine is very
hardy, unusually free from fungal diseases, is very resistant to
phylloxera and has been used in France as a phylloxera-resist-
ant grafting-stock. The juice is very thick and dark, a deep
purple, hence suitable for adding color to wine or grape-juice.
The origin of Oporto is unknown. It was brought into culti-
vation about 1860 by E. W. Sylvester, Lyons, New York.
Vine very vigorous, hardy, healthy, variable in productiveness.
Canes long, reddish-brown; nodes enlarged, flattened; internodes
long, diaphragm thin; tendrils continuous, bifid. Stamens reflexed.
Fruit mid-season, ships and keeps well. Clusters small, cylindrical,
often single-shouldered. Berries medium in size, round, black, glossy
with abundant bloom, persistent, firm; skin very thin, tender, with
much dark wine-colored pigment; flesh white, sometimes with purple
tinge, juicy, fine-grained, solid, sweet, spicy; fair quality. Seeds
free, numerous, small, broad, faintly notched, sharply pointed, plump,
dark brown.
OTHELLO
(Vinifera, Vulpina, Labrusea)
Arnold’s Hybrid, Canadian Hamburg, Canadian Hybrid
In France, Othello does remarkably well as a direct producer
and is used also for a resistant stock. While most of its
VARIETIES OF GRAPES 423
characters are spoken of in the superlative by the French, in
America the variety is not so highly esteemed because of sus-
ceptibility to fungi. Moreover, the fruit matures so late that
it could never become a valuable variety for the North. It is
in no sense a table-grape but makes a well-colored, pleasant
wine. Charles Arnold, Paris, Ontario, grew Othello from seed
of Clinton fertilized by Black Hamburg and planted in 1859.
Vine vigorous, hardy, productive. Canes long, brown; nodes
enlarged, flattened; tendrils continuous, sometimes intermittent, bifid
or trifid. Leaves of average size; upper surface light green, dull
and smooth; lower surface pale green, pubescent; lobes three to five
with terminal lobe acute; petiolar sinus deep, very narrow, frequently
closed and overlapping; basal sinus shallow, narrow; lateral sinus
deep; teeth deep, wide; stamens upright.
Fruit late, keeps fairly well. Clusters large, long, broad, tapering,
frequently with a loose single shoulder, compact; pedicel long, slender
with numerous small warts; brush short, wine-colored. Berries
large, oval, black, glossy with abundant bloom, very persistent; skin
thin, tough, adherent with red pigment; flesh dark green, very juicy,
fine-grained, tough, sprightly ; low in quality. Seeds free, one to three,
neck sometimes swollen, brown.
OzaRK
(Astivalis, Labrusca)
Ozark belongs to the South and to Missouri in particular.
Its merits and demerits have been threshed out by the Mis-
sourl grape-growers with the result that its culture is some-
what increasing. It is a grape of low quality, partly, perhaps,
from overbearing, which it habitually does unless the fruit is
thinned. The vine is healthy and a very strong grower, but
is self-sterile, which is against it as a market sort. In spite of
self-sterility and low quality, Ozark is a promising variety for
the country south of Pennsylvania. Ozark originated with
J. Stayman, Leavenworth, Kansas, from seed of unknown
source. The variety was introduced about 1890.
424 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
Vine very vigorous, hardy, productive. Canes long, thick with
thin bloom, surface roughened ; nodes enlarged, flattened; internodes
long; tendrils intermittent, usually bifid. Leaves dense, large;
upper surface light green; lower surface pale green, thinly pubescent,
ecobwebby; lobes three to five; petiolar sinus deep, narrow; serra-
tions shallow, narrow. Flowers self-sterile or nearly so, open late;
stamens reflexed.
Fruit late, keeps well. Clusters large, long, usually with a long,
loose shoulder, very compact; pedicel short, thick, smooth; brush
long, red. Berries variable in size, dull black with abundant bloom,
persistent ; skin tough with much wine-colored pigment; flesh tender,
mild; fair in quality. Seeds free, small. |
PALOMINO
(Vinifera)
Golden Chasselas. Listan
This variety seems to be grown in California under the three
names given — while in France Palomino is described as a
bluish-black grape. Palomino seems to be grown commonly
in California as a table-grape and is worth trying in eastern
America. The variety received under the name Palomino
from California at the New York Experiment Station has the
following characters, agreeing closely with those set down by
Californian viticulturists :
Fruit ripens about the 20th of October, keeping qualities good;
clusters medium to large, long, single-shouldered, tapering, loose;
berries medium to small, roundish, pale greenish-yellow, thin bloom;
skin and the adhering flesh medium tender and crisp, flesh surrounding
seeds melting; flavor sweet, vinous; quality good.
PEABODY
(Vulpina, Labrusea, Vinifera)
Peabody is as yet a comparatively unimportant offspring of
Clinton. The grapes are of excellent quality. It appears to
do better in the northern tier of states or in Canada, than
VARIETIES OF GRAPES 425
farther south. This variety was grown by J. H. Ricketts
about 1870.
Vine vigorous, hardy, productive. Canes long, numerous, thick,
light brown with ash-gray tinge, darker at nodes, covered with thin
bloom; nodes enlarged, flattened; internodes short; tendrils inter-
mittent, bifid or trifid. Leaves medium in size; upper surface dark
green, thin; lower surface pale green, nearly glabrous; lobes three,
acuminate; petiolar sinus shallow, wide; serration deep, narrow.
Flowers semi-fertile, mid-season; stamens upright.
Fruit early, keeps well. Clusters large, long, usually with a shoulder
connected to the bunch by along stem, compact; pedicel short, slender,
warty; brush short, green. Berries oval, black, glossy, covered with
thin bloom, persistent; skin thick, tough; flesh very juicy, tender,
vinous, spicy, agreeably sweet at the skin, tart at the center; good.
Seeds free, broad.
PERFECTION
(Labrusea, Bourquiniana, Vinifera)
Perfection is a seedling of Delaware, which it greatly re-
sembles but does not equal in fruit; its fruits being hardly as
high in quality, do not keep as well, shrivel more before ripen-
ing, and shell more readily. In its vine characters, it is much
_more like a Labrusca than Delaware, suggesting that it is a
Delaware cross. In the Southwest, Perfection is considered a
valuable early red grape. J. Stayman, Leavenworth, Kansas,
grew Perfection from seed of Delaware; it was sent out for
testing about 1890.
Vine vigorous, healthy, injured in severe winters, productive.
Canes of medium length and number, slender; nodes enlarged, flat-
tened ; internodes short; tendrils intermittent, trifid or bifid. Leaves
healthy, medium in size; upper surface light green; lower surface
grayish-white with a tinge of bronze, heavily pubescent; lobes wanting
or three to five; petiolar sinus shallow, wide; serration shallow.
Flowers self-fertile or nearly so, open in mid-season; stamens upright.
Fruit early. Clusters usually single-shouldered, compact; pedicel
short, slender, smooth; brush short, yellow. Berries small, round, red
_ but less brilliant than Delaware with faint bloom, inclined to drop
from pedicel, soft; skin thin, free from astringency; flesh medium in
426 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
juiciness and tenderness, vinous, mild, sweet; good in quality. Seeds
adherent, numerous, small, often with an enlarged neck.
PERKINS
(Labrusea, Vinifera)
At one time Perkins was grown largely as an early grape but
has been discarded very generally on account of the poor qual-
ity of the fruit. The pulp of the grape is hard and the flavor
is that of Wyoming and Northern Muscadine, grapes char-
acterized by disagreeable foxiness. As with nearly all Labrus-
cas, Perkins is a poor keeper. Notwithstanding the faults of
its fruit, the variety may have value in regions where grape-
growing is precarious; for in fruiting it is one of the most re-
liable grapes cultivated, the vines being hardy, vigorous, pro-
ductive and free from fungal diseases. Perkins is an accidental
seedling found about 1830 in the garden of Jacob Perkins,
Bridgewater, Massachusetts.
Vine vigorous, hardy, healthy, productive. Canes long, numerous,
thick, dark brown, deepening in color at the nodes, surface heavily
pubescent; nodes enlarged, flattened; internodes long; tendrils con-
tinuous, bifid or trifid. Leaves medium in size, thick; upper surface
rugose; lower surface heavily pubescent; veins distinct; lobes three ;
petiolar sinus deep, narrow; serration shallow. Flowers self-fertile,
early ; stamens upright.
Fruit early, ships well. Clusters of medium size and length, broad,
eylindrieal, often with a single shoulder, compact; pedicel short,
thick, warty; brush long, yellow. Berries large, oval, pale lilae or
light red with thin bloom, inclined to drop from the pedicel, soft;
skin thin, tough, without pigment; flesh white, juicy, stringy, fine-
grained, firm, meaty, very foxy; poor in quality. Seeds adherent,
numerous, medium in size, notehed.
POCKLINGTON
(Labrusea)
Before the advent of Niagara, Pocklington (Plate XXIT) was
the leading green grape. The variety has the fatal fault, how-
VARIETIES OF GRAPES 427
ever, of ripening its crop late, which with some minor defects
has caused it to fall below Niagara for northern grape districts.
Pocklington is a seedling of Concord and resembles its parent
in vine characters; the vines are fully equal to or surpass those
of Concord in hardiness, but are of slower growth and not
quite as healthy, vigorous nor productive. In quality, the
grapes are as good if not better than those of Concord or Ni-
agara, being sweet, rich and pleasantly flavored, although as
with the other grapes named, it has too much foxiness for criti-
eal consumers. Pocklington is not equal to several other grapes
of its season in quality, as Iona, Jefferson, Diana, Dutchess
and Catawba, but it is far above the average and for this reason
should be retained. John Pocklington, Sandy Hill, New York,
grew Pocklington from seed of Concord about 1870.
Vine medium in vigor, hardy. Canes of medium length, number and
size, dark reddish-brown; nodes enlarged, flattened; tendrils contin-
uous, bifid or trifid. Leaves variable in size, thick; upper surface
light green, glossy ; lower surface tinged with bronze, pubescent ; lobes
one to three with terminus acuminate; petiolar sinus deep, wide;
teeth narrow. Flowers self-fertile, mid-season; stamens upright.
Fruit late mid-season, keeps and ships well. Clusters large, eylin-
drical, often single-shouldered, compact; pedicel short, thick with
afew small warts; brush short, green. Berries large, oblate, yellowish-
green with tinge of amber, with thin bloom, firm; skin with seattering
russet dots, thin, tender, adherent, faintly astringent; flesh light
green with yellow tinge, translucent, juicy, tough, fine-grained, slightly
foxy; good. Seeds adherent, one to six, of medium length and breadth.
POUGHKEEPSIE
(Bourquiniana, Labrusea, Vinifera)
Poughkeepsie has been known long on the Hudson River,
yet it is now little grown there and has not been disseminated
widely elsewhere. In quality of fruit, it is equal to the best
American varieties, but the vine characters are all poor and
the variety is thus effectually debarred from common cultiva-
tion. Both vine and fruit resemble those of Delaware, but in
428 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
neither does it quite equal the latter. In particular, the vine
is more easily winter-killed and is less productive than that of
Delaware. The grapes ripen a little earlier than those of the
last named sort and this, with their beauty and fine quality,
is sufficient to recommend it for the garden at least. About
1865, A. J. Caywood, Marlboro, New York, grew Pough-
keepsie from seed of Iona fertilized by mixed pollen of Delaware
and Walter.
Vine of medium vigor. Canes short, thick, dark reddish-brown ;
tendrils intermittent, frequently three in line, bifid or trifid. Leaves
small; upper surface green, glossy, older leaves rugose; lower surface
grayish-green, pubescent. Flowers self-fertile, late; stamens upright.
Fruit early, keeps and ships well. Clusters small, tapering, usually
single-shouldered, very compact. Berries small, round, pale red with
thin bloom, persistent, firm; skin thin, tender, without pigment;
flesh pale green, very juicy, tender, melting, fine-grained, vinous, sweet ;
very good to best. Seeds free, small, broad, with enlarged neck, brown.
PRENTISS
(Labrusea, Vinifera)
Prentiss is a green grape of high quality, once well known
and generally recommended, but now going out of cultivation
because the vine is tender to cold, lacks in vigor, is unpro-
ductive, uncertain in bearing and is subject to rot and mildew.
There are vineyards in which it does very well and in such it
is a remarkably attractive green grape, especially in form of
cluster and in color of berry, in these respects resembling the
one-time favorite, Rebecca, although not so high in quality
as that variety. Its season is given as both before and after
Concord. Prentiss always must remain a variety for the
amateur and for special localities. It originated with J. W.
Prentiss, Pulteney, New York, about 1870 from seed of Isabella.
Vine weak. Canes thick, light to dark brown; tendrils continuous,
bifid. Leaves small, thick; upper surface light green, rugose in the
VARIETIES OF GRAPES 429
older leaves; lower surface pale green, pubescent. Flowers self-fertile,
mid-season; stamens upright.
Fruit variable in season, about with Concord, keeps well. Cluster
medium in size, tapering, sometimes with a single shoulder, compact.
Berries medium in size, oval, light green with a yellow tinge, thin
bloom, persistent, firm; skin tough, without pigment; flesh pale
green, juicy, foxy; good. Seeds adherent, numerous, notched, short,
sharp-pointed, dark brown.
PURPLE CORNICHON
(Vinifera)
Black Cornichon
By virtue of attractive appearance and excellent shipping
qualities of the fruit, this variety takes high place among the
commercial grapes of California. Late ripening is another
quality making it desirable, while its curious, long, curved
berries add novelty to its attractions. The fruit does not take
high rank in quality. The description has been compiled.
Vine very vigorous, healthy and productive; wood light brown
striped with darker brown, short-jointed. Leaves large, longer than
wide, deeply five-lobed; dark green above, lighter and very hairy
below; coarsely toothed; with short, thick petiole. Bunches very
large, loose or sometimes scraggly, borne on long peduncles; berries
large, long, more or less curved, dark purple, spotted, thick-skinned,
borne on long pedicels; flesh firm, crisp, sweet but not rich in flavor ;
quality good but not high. Season late, keeps and ships well.
REBECCA
(Labrusea, Vinifera)
In the middle of the last century, when grape-growing was in
the hands of the connoisseurs, Rebecca was one of the sterling
green varieties. It is wholly unsuited for commercial vine-
yards and for years has been disappearing gradually from
cultivation. The fruit is exceptionally fine, consisting of well-
formed bunches and berries, the latter handsome yellowish-
430 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
white and semi-transparent. In quality, the grapes are of the
best, with a rich, sweet flavor and pleasing aroma. But the
vine characters condemn Rebecca for any but the amateur.
The vines lack in hardiness and vigor, are susceptible to mildew
and other fungi and are productive only under the best con-
ditions. The original vine was an accidental seedling found
in the garden of E. M. Peake, Hudson, New York, and bore its
first fruit in 1852.
Vine weak, sometimes vigorous, doubtfully hardy. Canes long,
numerous, slender, dull brown, deepening in color at the nodes; tendrils
continuous or intermittent, bifid or trifid. Leaves variable in size;
upper surface dark green, dull, rugose; lower surface grayish-green,
pubescent. Flowers self-fertile; stamens upright.
Fruit late mid-season, ships and keeps well. Clusters small, short,
cylindrical, rarely with a small, single shoulder, compact. Berries
of medium size, oval, green with yellow tinge verging on amber, thin
gray bloom, persistent, firm; skin thin, without pigment; flesh pale
green, very juicy, tender, melting, vinous, a little foxy, sweet; good
to very good. Seeds free, short, narrow, blunt, brown.
Rep EAGLE
(Labrusea, Vinifera)
Red Eagle is a pure-bred seedling of Black Eagle which: it
resembles in all characters except color of fruit. Vine and
fruit exhibit the characters found in Rogers’ hybrids. It takes
high rank as a grape of quality and can be recommended for
the garden. The variety originated with 'T. V. Munson, Deni-
son, Texas, and was sent out in 1888.
Vine medium in vigor and hardiness, productive. Canes few, slen-
der, dark brown with heavy bloom; nodes prominent, flattened ;
tendrils continuous or intermittent, long, bifid. Leaves thick; upper
surface light green, dull, rugose; lower surface grayish-green, pubes-
cent; lobes three to five with terminus obtuse; petiolar sinus deep,
narrow, sometimes closed and overlapping; basal sinus wide; lateral
sinus deep, wide; teeth deep, wide. Flowers semi-fertile, late;
stamens upright.
VARIETIES OF GRAPES 431
Fruit early mid-season, keeps well. Clusters small, broad, taper-
ing, single-shouldered, sometimes double-shouldered, loose with many
abortive berries; pedicel very long, slender; brush green with brown
tinge. Berries variable in size, round, light to very dark red with
heavy bloom, persistent, soft; skin thick, tender, adherent with some
red pigment; flesh green, transparent, juicy, very tender, melting,
slightly foxy, tart; very good. Seeds free, one to five, large, long,
blunt, light brown.
REGAL
(Labrusea, Vinifera)
Regal is an offspring of Lindley, which it greatly resembles.
The fruit is attractive in appearance and high in quality. A
seemingly insignificant fault might make Regal undesirable in
a commercial vineyard; the clusters are borne so close to the
wood that it is difficult to harvest the fruit and avoid injury to
the berries next to the wood. The variety is worthy of ex-
tensive culture in vineyards and gardens. Regal originated
with W. A. Woodward, Rockford, Illinois, in 1879.
Vine vigorous, hardy, healthy, very productive. Canes interme-
diate in length and size, numerous, dark reddish-brown. Tendrils
intermittent, bifid or trifid. Leaves large; upper surface green,
glossy and rugose; lower surface pale green with a bronze tinge,
strongly pubescent. Flowers self-fertile, mid-season ; stamens upright.
Fruit mid-season, keeps well. Clusters small, broad, cylindrical,
usually with a short single shoulder, sometimes double-shouldered, very
compact. Berries large, round, purplish-red with faint bloom, per-
sistent. Skin thin, tough, without pigment. Flesh pale green, very
juicy, fine-grained, tender, musky; good. Seeds free, numerous, long,
narrow, notched, blunt with a short neck, brown.
REQUA
(Labrusea, Vinifera)
This is one of Rogers’ hybrids which equals other grapes of
its color and season. The grapes are attractive in cluster and
berry and are of very good quality but are subject to rot and
432 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
ripen too late for northern regions. The variety was named
Requa in 1869, it having been previously known as No. 28.
Vine vigorous, hardy except in severe winters, medium in produc-
tiveness. Canes long, thick; tendrils continuous or intermittent,
trifid or bifid. Leaves medium in size, dark green, often thick and
rugose; lower surface grayish-green, pubescent. Flowers semi-fertile,
late; stamens reflexed.
Fruit late, keeps long. Clusters large, cylindrical, often with
a long, single shoulder, compact. Berries large, oval, dark, dull red
covered with thin bloom, strongly adherent; skin thin, tough, ad-
herent; flesh pale green, tender, stringy, vinous, foxy, sweet; good
to very good. Seeds adherent, medium in size and length, broad, blunt.
ROCHESTER
(Labrusea, Vinifera)
The fruit of Rochester is a large-clustered red grape, handsome
and very good in quality. The vine is a strong grower, pro-
ductive and free from diseases. The variety is difficult to
propagate and, therefore, not in favor with nurserymen. The
grapes are sweet, rich and vinous but should be used as soon as
ripe, as they do not keep well and the berries quickly shatter
from the bunch. As an attractive early red grape, Rochester
is worth a place in the garden and in favored locations for a
special market. Ellwanger and Barry, Rochester, New York,
in 1867 grew Rochester from mixed seed of Delaware, Diana,
Concord and Rebecca.
Vine vigorous, hardy, productive. Canes long, dark reddish-brown ;
nodes enlarged, flattened; internodes short; tendrils intermittent,
long, bifid or trifid. Leaves large; upper surface light green, glossy,
smooth; lower surface grayish-green, pubescent; lobes one to three
with terminus acute; petiolar sinus deep; basal sinus absent; lateral
sinus shallow; teeth shallow. Flowers fertile, mid-season; stamens
upright.
Fruit does not keep well. Clusters large, broad, tapering, usually
single-shouldered, compact; pedicel short, slender with few warts;
brush slender, yellowish-brown, Berries medium, oval, purplish-red,
Pirate XXXII. — Wyoming (2).
ee ee
VARIETIES OF GRAPES 433
dull with thin, lilac bloom, drop from the pedicel, soft; skin thick,
tough, inclined to crack, free, without pigment, astringent; flesh pale
green, transparent, juicy, tender, fine-grained, vinous, sweet; good
to very good. Seeds free, one to three, large, short, broad, dark brown.
ROMMEL
(Labrusea, Vulpina, Vinifera)
Rommel is rarely cultivated in the North, because the vines
lack in robustness, hardiness and productiveness and are sus-
ceptible to the leaf-hopper; and the grapes do not attain high
quality and crack as they ripen. The bunch and berry are
attractive in form, size and color. At its best, Rommel is a
good table-grape and makes a fine white wine. It is worth
growing in the South. T. V. Munson, Denison, Texas, origi-
nated Rommel in 1885, from seed of Elvira pollinated by Tri-
umph, and introduced it in 1889.
Vine vigorous in the South. Canes long, numerous, thick, reddish-
brown, surface roughened ; nodes enlarged, often flattened ; internodes
short; tendrils intermittent, long, bifid or trifid. Leaves medium in
size, round, thick; upper surface light green, dull, rugose; lower sur-
face pale green, free from pubescence but slightly hairy; leaf not
lobed, terminus acute to acuminate; petiolar sinus deep, narrow, often
closed and overlapping; basal sinus lacking; lateral sinus shallow when
present; teeth deep. Flowers semi-fertile, late; stamens upright.
Fruit mid-season, ships and keeps well. Clusters medium to short,
broad, cylindrical, single-shouldered, compact ; pedicel slender, smooth ;
brush short, pale green. Berries large, roundish, light green with a
yellow tinge, glossy, persistent, firm; skin thin, cracks badly, tender,
adherent, without pigment or astringency; flesh greenish, translucent,
juicy, tender, melting, stringy, sweet; fair to good. Seeds free, one to
four, broad, sharp-pointed, plump, brown.
Rosak1I
(Vinifera)
Rosaki is a table- and raisin-grape of southeastern Europe and
Asia Minor. According to some of the California nursery
2F
434 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
companies, it is grown in that state under the name Dattier de
Beyrouth, although it would seem from French descriptions
that there is a separate, very late variety of the latter name.
Rosaki is similar to Malaga and there is a possibility that in
some of the warmer parts of the East, it may be grown commer-
clally as a substitute for the latter. The variety seems to be
little grown on the Pacific slope.
Vines vigorous, usually very productive. Leaves large, roundish,
rugose, usually five-lobed; terminal lobe acuminate; petiolar sinus
moderately deep to deep, medium broad; lower lateral sinus shallow,
broad, occasionally lacking; upper lateral sinus shallow to medium,
broad; margins broadly and bluntly dentate. Fruit ripens the third
week in October, keeping qualities excellent; clusters large, loose,
tapering, shouldered; berries large to very large, oval to long-oval,
pale yellow-green; flesh translucent, tender, meaty, vinous, sprightly ;
quality good to very good.
Rose oF PERU
(Vinifera)
Rose of Peru is a favorite table-grape in California, confused
with and possibly the same as Black Prince. Its chief com-
mendable characters are handsome appearance and high quality
of fruit and very productive vines. It is not adapted for
shipping and does not enter plentifully into commerce. Its
season is so late that the variety is hardly worth trying
in the East, and yet it has matured in favorable seasons
at Geneva, New York. The following description is com-
piled :
Vine vigorous, healthy, productive; wood short-jointed, dark
brown. Leaves of medium size; deep green above, lighter green
and tomentose below. Bunches very large, shouldered, very loose,
often seraggly; berry large, round, black with firm, crackling flesh ;
skin rather thin and tender; flavor sweet and rich; quality very good
to best. Season late, keeping rather well but not shipping well:
VARIETIES OF GRAPES 435
SALEM
(Labrusea, Vinifera)
Rogers’ No. 22, Rogers’ No. 53
Salem (Plate X XVII) is the one of Rogers’ hybrids of which
the originator is said to have thought most, and to which he
gave the name of his place of residence. The two chief faults,
unproductiveness and susceptibility to mildew, are not found
in all localities, and in these districts, near good markets, Salem
ought to rank high as a commercial fruit. The vine is hardy,
vigorous and productive and bears handsome fruit of high
quality. This variety was christened Salem by Rogers in
1867, two years earlier than his other hybrids were named.
Vine vigorous, hardy, variable in productiveness. Canes long,
dark brown; nodes enlarged ; tendrils continuous or intermittent, long,
bifid or trifid. Leaves variable in size; upper surface dark green,
dull; lower surface pale green with slight bronze tinge, pubescent ;
lobes one to three with terminus acute; petiolar sinus deep, narrow,
often overlapping; basal sinus lacking; lateral sinus shallow, narrow,
notched. Flowers sterile, mid-season; stamens reflexed.
Fruit early, keeps and ships well. Clusters large, short, broad,
tapering, heavily shouldered, compact; pedicel short, thick with small
warts, enlarged at point of attachment to berry; brush short, pale
green. Berries large, round, dark red, dull, persistent, soft; skin
thick, adherent, without pigment, astringent; flesh translucent, juicy,
tender, stringy, fine-grained, vinous, sprightly; good to very good.
Seeds one to six, large, long and broad, blunt, brown.
SCUPPERNONG
(Rotundifolia)
American Muscadine, Bull, Bullace, Bullet, Fox Grape, Green
Scuppernong, Green Muscadine, Hickman, Muscadine, Roanoke
Scuppernong is preéminently the grape of the South, the
chief representative of the great species, V. rotundifolia, which
436 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
runs riot in natural luxuriance from Delaware and Maryland to
the Gulf and westward from the Atlantic to Arkansas and Texas.
Scuppernong vines are found on arbors, in gardens, or half wild,
on trees and fences on nearly every farm in the South Atlantic
states. As a rule, these vines receive little cultivation, are
unpruned and are given no care of any kind; but even under
neglect they produce large crops. The vines are almost immune
to mildew, rot, phylloxera, or other fungal or insect pests; they
give not only an abundance of fruit but on arbors and trellises
are much prized for their shade and beauty. The fruit, to a
palate accustomed to other grapes, is not very acceptable,
having a musky flavor and a somewhat repugnant odor, which,
however, with familiarity becomes quite agreeable. The pulp
is sweet and juicy but is lacking in sprightliness. The grapes
are not suitable for the market since the berries drop from the
bunch in ripening and become more or less smeared with juice
so that their appearance is not appetizing.
Vine vigorous, not hardy in the North, very productive. Canes
long, numerous, slender, ash-gray to grayish-brown; surface smooth,
thickly covered with small, light brown dots; tendrils intermittent,
simple. Leaves small, thin; upper surface light green, smooth; lower
surface very pale green, pubescent along the ribs; veins inconspicuous.
Flowers very late; stamens reflexed.
Fruit late, ripens unevenly, berries drop as they mature. Clusters
small, round, unshouldered, loose. Berries few in a cluster, large,
round, dull green, often with brown tinge, firm; skin thiek, tough
with many small russet dots; flesh pale green, juicy, tender, soft,
fine-grained, foxy, sweet to agreeably tart; fair to good. Seeds ad-
herent, large, short, broad, unnotched, blunt, plump, surface smooth,
brown.
SECRETARY
(Vinifera, Vulpina, Labrusca)
Injured by mildew and rot which attack leaves, fruit and
young wood, the vines of Secretary are able to produce good
grapes only in exceptional seasons and in favored localities.
VARIETIES OF GRAPES 437
The fruit characters of Secretary, however, give the grapes
exceptionally high quality, the berries being meaty yet juicy,
fine-grained and tender, with a sweet, spicy, vinous flavor.
The bunches are large, well-formed, with medium-sized, pur-
plish-black berries covered with thick bloom, making a very
handsome cluster. While the vine and foliage somewhat
resemble those of Clinton, one of its parents, the variety is not
_ nearly as hardy, vigorous nor productive. Moreover, in any
but favored localities in the North, its maturity is somewhat
uncertain. These defects keep Secretary from becoming of
commercial importance and make it of value only to the
amateur. Secretary is one of the first productions of J. H.
Ricketts, Newburgh, New York, the original vine coming from
seed of Clinton fertilized by Muscat Hamburg, planted in 1867.
Vine vigorous, doubtfully hardy, variable in productiveness.
Canes numerous, light brown, conspicuously darker at nodes, surface
ecvered with thin, blue bloom; tendrils intermittent, bifid. Leaves
small to medium, thin; upper surface light green, dull, smooth; lower
surface pale green, glabrous. Flowers semi-fertile, early; stamens
upright.
Fruit ripens after Concord, keeps and ships well. Clusters large,
long, cylindrical with a large, single shoulder, often loose and with many
abortive fruits. Berries large, round, flattened at attachment to
pedicel, dark purplish-black, glossy, persistent, firm; skin tough with
wine-colored pigment; flesh green, juicy, fine-grained, tender, vinous,
sweet; good. Seeds free, large, broad, notched, long, dark brown.
SENASQUA
(Labrusea, Vinifera)
The vine of Senasqua lacks in vigor, hardiness, productiveness
and health. The grapes are of good quality, and when well
grown are up to the average fruits of the Labrusca-Vinifera
hybrids. Unfortunately the berries have a tendency to crack
which is aggravated by the bunches being so compact as to
crowd the berries. Senasqua is one of the latest grapes to open
its buds and is, therefore, seldom injured by late frosts. It
438 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
can be recommended only for the garden for the sake of variety.
Stephen W. Underhill of Crown Point, New York, originated
Senasqua from seed of Concord pollinated by Black Prince.
Vine weak and tender, often unproductive. Canes short, few, red-
dish-brown; nodes enlarged, flattened; tendrils intermittent, long,
trifid or bifid. Leaves light green, glossy, rugose; lower surface
whitish-green, pubescent; leaf usually not lobed with terminus acute;
petiolar sinus narrow; basal and lateral sinuses shallow and narrow
when present. Flowers fertile, late; stamens upright.
Fruit a little later than Concord, keeps well. Clusters large, broad, ~
irregularly tapering, usually with a small, single shoulder, very com-
pact; pedicel thick, smooth, enlarged at point of attachment; brush
short, reddish. Berries large, round, reddish-black, persistent, firm ;
skin thick, tender, cracks, adherent, contains some wine-colored pig-
ment; flesh green, translucent, juicy, tender, meaty, vinous, spicy ;
good. Seeds free, one to five, long, narrow, one-sided, light brown.
SULTANA
(Vinifera)
This variety was formerly the standard seedless grape in
California for home use and raisins, but it is now outstripped by
Sultanina. Sultana is possibly better flavored than Sultanina
but the vines are hardly as vigorous or productive and the
berries often have seeds. The description is compiled.
Vines vigorous, upright, productive. Leaves large, five-lobed,
with large sinuses, light in color, coarsely toothed. Bunches large,
long, cylindrical, heavily shouldered, sometimes not well filled,
often loose and seraggly; berries small, round, firm and crisp, golden-
yellow, sweet with considerable piquancy ; quality good.
SULTANINA
(Vinifera)
Thompson’s Seedless
Sultanina is one of the standard seedless grapes of the Pacific
slope, grown both to eat out of hand and for raisins. Probably
VARIETIES OF GRAPES 439
it can be grown in home plantations in favored parts of eastern
America where the season is long and warm. The following
description is compiled from Californian viticulturists :
Vine very vigorous, very productive; trunk large with very long
eanes. Leaves glabrous on both sides, dark yellow-green above,
light below; generally three-lobed, with shallow sinuses; teeth short
and obtuse. Bunch large, conico-cylindrical, well filled, with her-
baceous peduncles; berries oval, beautiful golden-yellow color;
skin moderately thick; flesh of rather neutral flavor; very good.
TAYLOR
(Vulpina, Labrusea)
Bullitt
While it is from the species to which Taylor belongs that we
must look for our hardiest vines, nevertheless this grape and its
offspring, although not tender to cold, do best in southern
regions, as they require a long warm summer to mature prop-
erly. The quality of the fruit of Taylor is fair to good, the
flavor being sweet, pure, delicate and spicy and the flesh tender
and juicy; but the bunches are small and the flowers are in-
fertile so that the berries do not set well, making very imperfect
and unsightly clusters. The skin is such, also, that it cracks
badly, a defect seemingly transmitted to many of the seedlings of
the variety. The vine is strong, healthy, hardy but not very
productive. The original vine of Taylor was a wild seedling
found in the early part of the last century on the Cumberland
Mountains near the Kentucky-Tennessee line by a Mr. Cobb.
Vine vigorous to rank, healthy, hardy, variable in productiveness.
Leaves small, attractive in color, smooth. Flowers bloom early;
stamens reflexed.
Fruit ripens about two weeks before Isabella. Clusters small
to medium, shouldered, loose or moderately compact. Berries small
to medium, roundish, pale greenish-white, sometimes tinged with
amber; skin very thin; pulp sweet, spicy; fair to good in quality.
440 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
TRIUMPH
(Labrusea, Vinifera)
When quality, color, shape and size of bunch and berry are
considered, Triumph (Plate XXVIII) is one of the finest
dessert grapes of America. At its best, it is a magnificent bunch
of golden grapes of highest quality, esteemed even in southern
Europe where it must compete with the best of the Viniferas.
In America, however, its commercial importance is curtailed by
the fact that the fruit requires a long season for proper develop-
ment. ‘Triumph has, in general, the vine characters of the
Labrusca parent, Concord, especially its habit of growth, vigor,
productiveness and foliage characters, falling short in hardiness,
resistance to fungal diseases and earliness of fruit, the fruit
maturing with or a little later than Catawba. While the vine
characters of Triumph are those of Labrusca, there is scarcely a
suggestion of the coarseness, or of the foxy odor and taste of
Labrusca, and the objectionable seeds, pulp and skin of the
native grape give way. to the far less objectionable structures of
Vinifera. The flesh is tender and melting and the flavor rich,
sweet, vinous, pure and delicate. The skins of the berries under
unfavorable conditions crack badly, the variety, therefore,
neither shipping nor keeping well. ‘Triumph was grown soon
after the Civil War by George W. Campbell, Delaware, Ohio,
from seed of Concord fertilized by Chassalas Musque.
Vine vigorous. Canes long, dark brown with much bloom; nodes
enlarged; tendrils intermittent, long, trifid, sometimes bifid. Leaves
large; upper surface light green, dull, rugose; lower surface grayish-
white, pubescent ; leaf usually not lobed with terminus obtuse; petiolar
sinus deep, narrow, often closed and overlapping; basal sinus absent ;
lateral sinus shallow and narrow when present; teeth deep, wide.
Flowers self-fertile, late; stamens upright.
Fruit very late. Clusters very large, long, broad, cylindrical,
sometimes single-shouldered, compact; pedicel slender, smooth; brush
short, yellowish-green. Berries medium in size, oval, golden yellow,
glossy with heavy bloom, persistent, firm; skin thin, inclined to crack,
VARIETIES OF GRAPES 441
adherent, without pigment, slightly astringent; flesh light green,
translucent, juicy, fine-grained, tender, vinous; good to very good.
Seeds free, one to five, small, brown.
ULSTER
(Labrusea, Vinifera)
The vines of Ulster set too much fruit in spite of efforts to
control the crop by pruning; two undesirable results follow,
the bunches are small and the vines, lacking vigor at best, fail
to recover from the overfruitfulness. These defects keep the
variety from becoming of importance commercially or even a
favorite as a garden grape. The quality of the fruit is very
good, being much like that of Catawba, and under favorable
conditions it is an attractive green with a red tinge. The
fruit keeps well when the variety is grown under conditions
suited to it. Ulster originated with A. J. Caywood, Marlboro,
New York, and was introduced by him about 1885. Its
parents are said to be Catawba pollinated by a wild Aésti-
valis. Both vine and fruit show traces of Labrusca and
Vinifera, but the A#stivalis characters, if present, are not
apparent.
Vine hardy, productive, overbears. Canes short, slender, dark
brown, surface roughened and covered with faint pubescence; nodes
enlarged and flattened; internodes short; tendrils intermittent, bifid,
dehisce early. Leaves small, thick; upper surface light green, glossy,
smooth; lower surface grayish-white, pubescent; leaf usually not lobed
with terminus acute; petiolar sinus medium to wide; basal sinus
absent; lateral sinus a notch when present; teeth shallow, wide.
Flowers self-fertile, early ; stamens upright.
Fruit late mid-season. Clusters long, cylindrical, often single-~
shouldered, compact; pedicel slender, with numerous warts ; brush
short, yellowish-green. Berries medium in size, round, dark dull red
with thin bloom, persistent; skin thick, tough, adherent, astringent ;
flesh pale green, translucent, juicy, tender, fine-grained, faintly aro-
matic, slightly foxy; good to very good. Seeds free, one to six,
medium in size, plump, brown.
442 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
VERDAL
(Vinifera)
Aspiran Blanc
Verdal is one of the standard late grapes of the Pacific slope,
ripening among the last. The grapes are seen seldom in distant
markets and the quality is not quite good enough to make it
a very great favorite for home plantations. Vigor and hardiness
of vines commend it as do the large and handsome fruits, and
these qualities, with late ripening, will probably long keep it on
grape lists in the far West. The description is compiled.
Vines vigorous, hardy, healthy and productive; canes rather
slender, half ereet. Leaves of medium size, glabrous on both surfaces,
except below near the axis of the main nerve; sinuses well marked and
generally closed, giving the leaf the appearance of having five holes;
teeth long, unequal, acuminate. Bunches large to very large, irregu-
lar, long-coniecal, usually compact; shoulders small or lacking; berries
large or very large, yellowish-green; skin thick but tender; flesh erisp,
firm; flavor agreeable but not rich; quality good. Season very late,
keeping and shipping well.
VERGENNES
(Labrusea)
The most valuable attribute of Vergennes (Plate XXIX) is
certainty in bearing. The vine seldom fails to bear although it
often overbears, causing variability in size of fruits and time of
ripening. With a moderate crop, the grapes ripen with Con-
eord, but with a heavy load from one to two weeks later.
Vergennes is somewhat unpopular with vinevardists because
of the sprawling habit of the vines which makes them untract-
able for vineyard operations; this fault is obviated by grafting
on other vines. The grapes are attractive, the quality is good,
flavor agreeable, the flesh tender, and seeds and skin are not
objectionable. Vergennes is the standard late-keeping grape
VARIETIES OF GRAPES 443
for northern regions, being very common in the markets as
late as January. The original vine was a chance seedling in
the garden of William E. Greene, Vergennes, Vermont, in 1874.
Vine variable in vigor, doubtfully hardy, productive, healthy.
Canes long, dark brown; nodes enlarged, strongly flattened; tendrils
continuous, long, bifid or trifid. Leaves large, thin; upper surface
light green, glossy, rugose; lower surface pale green, very pubescent ;
leaf usually not lobed with terminus broadly acute ; petiolar sinus wide ;
teeth shallow. Flowers semi-sterile, mid-season; stamens upright.
Fruit late, keeps and ships well. Clusters of medium size, broad,
cylindrical, sometimes single-shouldered, loose; pedicel with numerous
small warts; brush slender, short, pale green. Berries large, oval,
light and dark red with thin bloom, persistent; skin thick, tough,
adherent, astringent; flesh pale green, juicy, fine-grained, somewhat
stringy, tender, vinous; good to very good. Seeds free, one to five,
blunt, brown.
WALTER
(Vinifera, Labrusea, Bourquiniana)
Were it not almost impossible to grow healthy vines of Walter,
the variety would rank high among American grapes. But
stuntedsby fungi which attack leaves, young wood and fruit, it
is possible only in exceptionally favorable seasons satisfactorily
to produce crops of this variety. Besides susceptibility to
diseases, the vines are fastidious to soils, everywhere variable in
growth and are injured in cold winters. As if to atone for the
faults of the vine, the fruit of Walter is almost perfect, lacking
only in size of bunch and berry. The bunch and berry resemble
those of Delaware, but the fruit is not as high in quality as that
of its parents. Walter is adapted to conditions under which
Delaware thrives. A. J. Caywood, Modena, New York, grew
this variety about 1850 from seed of Delaware pollinated by
Diana.
Vine vigorous. Canes medium in length and size, dark reddish-
brown with thin bloom; nodes enlarged, flattened; tendrils intermit-
tent, bifid. Leaves thick; upper surface dark green, glossy, smooth ;
444 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
lower surface tinged with bronze, heavily pubescent; lobes one to three
with terminus acute; petiolar sinus narrow; basal sinus lacking; lat-
eral sinus a notch if present. Flowers mid-season; stamens upright.
Fruit early, keeps and ships well. Clusters medium in size, broad,
cylindrical, usually single-shouldered, compact; pedicel slender,
with small, scattering warts; brush short, slender, green with brown
tinge. Berries small, ovate, red, glossy with thin bloom, persistent,
firm; skin very tough, adheres slightly, unpigmented; flesh pale
green, translucent, juicy, tough, somewhat foxy, vinous, aromatic;
good to very good. Seeds adherent, one to four, small, sharp-pointed,
light brown.
WILDER
(Labrusea, Vinifera)
The fruit of Wilder is surpassed in quality and appearance
by other of Rogers’ hybrids, but the vine is the most reliable of
any of these hybrid sorts, being vigorous, hardy, productive,
and, although somewhat susceptible to mildew, as healthy as
any. Wilder is not as well known in the markets as it should
be, and now that fungal diseases can be controlled by spraying
should be more commonly planted in commercial vineyards,
especially for local markets. Wilder is one of the fgrty-five
Labrusca-Vinifera hybrids raised by E. S. Rogers, Salem, Mas-
sachusetts, having been described first in 1858.
Vine vigorous, hardy, productive, susceptible to mildew. Canes
long, numerous, reddish-brown, darker at the nodes; internodes long ;
tendrils intermittent, bifid or trifid. Leaves large, irregularly round ;
upper surface dark green, glossy, smooth; lower surface pale green,
pubescent; usually not lobed with terminus acute; petiolar sinus
deep, narrow, often closed and overlapping; basal sinus lacking;
lateral sinus shallow, narrow, or a mere notch when present. Flowers
self-sterile, mid-season; stamens reflexed.
Fruit early mid-season, keeps and ships well. Clusters variable
in size, short, broad, tapering, heavily single-shouldered, loose ; pedicel
long, thick with numerous warts; brush thick, green with tinge of red.
Berries large, oval, purplish-black with heavy bloom, persistent, firm ;
skin thick, adherent to pulp, with bright red pigment, astringent ;
flesh green, translucent, juicy, tender; good. Seeds adherent, one to
five, long, light brown.
VARIETIES OF GRAPES 445
WINCHELL
(Labrusea, Vinifera, Austivalis)
Green Mountain
The vines of Winchell (Plate XXX) are vigorous, hardy,
healthy, productive, and the fruit is early, of high quality and
ships well—altogether a most admirable early grape. There
are some minor faults which become drawbacks in the culture of
Winchell. The berries, and under some conditions the bunches,
are small and the bunch is loose with a large shoulder. Some-
times this looseness becomes so pronounced as to give a strag-
eling, poorly-formed cluster ; and the shoulder, when as large as
the cluster itself, which often happens, makes the cluster un-
sightly. The grapes shell when fully ripe, a serious fault.
Again, while the crop usually ripens evenly, there are seasons
when two pickings are needed because of the unevenness in
ripening. Lastly, the skin is thin and there is danger in un-
favorable seasons of the berries cracking, although this is seldom
a serious fault. These defects do not offset the several good
characters of Winchell which make it the standard early
green grape, deserving to rank with the best early grapes of
any color. The original vine was raised by James Milton
Clough, Stamford, Vermont, about 1850 from seed of an un-
known purple grape.
Vine vigorous, hardy, healthy, very productive. Canes long, nu-
merous, slender, dark brown with thin bloom; nodes enlarged, flat-
tened; tendrils continuous, sometimes intermittent, bifid. Leaves
large; upper surface light green, glossy, smooth; lower surface dull
green, tinged with bronze, faintly pubescent; lobes three to five with
terminal lobe acute; petiolar sinus deep; basal sinus shallow; teeth
shallow, wide. Flowers fertile, mid-season; stamens upright.
Fruit early, keeps and ships well. Clusters long, slender, cylindri-
eal, often with a long shoulder, compact; pedicel short, slender with
few inconspicuous warts; brush greenish-white. Berries small,
round, light green, persistent, soft; skin marked with small, reddish-
446 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
brown spots, thin, tender, slightly astringent; flesh green, translucent,
juicy, tender, fine-grained, sweet; very good to best. Seeds free, one
to four, small, plump, wide and long, blunt, brown.
WoopDRUFF
(Labrusea, Vinifera ?)
Woodruff is a handsome, showy, brick-red grape with large
clusters and berries, but its taste belies its looks, for the flesh
is coarse and the flavor poor. The variety would not be worth
attention were it not for its excellent vine characters; the
vines are hardy, productive and healthy. The grapes ripen a
little before Concord and come on the market at a favorable
time, especially for a red grape. Woodruff originated from C.
H. Woodruff, Ann Arbor, Michigan, as a chance seedling which
came up in 1874 and fruited first in 1877.
Vine very vigorous, hardy. Canes dark brown; nodes enlarged,
flattened; tendrils continuous, bifid or trifid. Leaves round; upper
surface light green, dull, rugose; lower surface greenish-white, pubes-
cent; leaf usually not lobed with terminus acute; petiolar sinus wide ;
basal sinus lacking; lateral sinus shallow and narrow when present;
teeth shallow. Flowers semi-fertile, early; stamens upright.
Fruit ripening before Concord. Clusters broad, widely tapering,
usually single-shouldered, compact; pedicel short, thick, smooth;
brush long, pale green. Berries large, round, dark red, dull, firm;
skin thin, tender, adherent, slightly astringent; flesh pale green, trans-
lucent, juicy, tough, coarse, very foxy; fair in quality. Seeds ad-
herent, one to five, broad, short, plump, blunt, brown,
WorDEN
(Labrusea)
Of the many offspring of Concord, Worden (Plate XXXI) is
best known and most meritorious. The grapes differ chiefly
from those of Concord in having larger berries and bunches, in
having better quality and in being a week to ten days earlier.
VARIETIES OF GRAPES 447
The vine is equally hardy, healthy, vigorous and productive but
is more fastidious in its adaptations to soil, although now and
then it does even better. The chief fault of the variety is that
the fruit cracks badly, often preventing the profitable marketing
of acrop. Besides this tenderness of skin, the fruit-pulp of
Worden is softer than that of Concord, there is more juice, and
the keeping qualities are not as good, so that the grapes hardly
ship as well as those of the more commonly grown grape.
Worden is very popular in northern grape regions both for com-
mercial plantations and the garden. It is a more desirable
inhabitant of the garden, because of higher quality of fruit than
Concord, and under conditions well suited to it is better as a
commercial variety, as the fruit is handsomer as well as of
better quality. In the markets the fruit ought to sell for a
higher price than Concord if desired for immediate consumption,
and if it can be harvested promptly, as it does not hang well on
the vines. Its earlier season is against it for a commercial
variety and, with the defects mentioned, will prevent its taking
the place of Concord to a great degree. Worden was originated
by Schuyler Worden, Minetto, Oswego County, New York,
from seed of Concord planted about 1863.
Vine vigorous, hardy, healthy, productive. Canes large, thick,
dark brown with reddish tinge; nodes enlarged, flattened; tendrils
continuous, slender, bifid, sometimes trifid. Young leaves tinged
on the under side and along the margins of upper side with rose-
earmine. Leaves large, thick; upper surface dark green, glossy,
smooth; lower surface light bronze, pubescent; leaf usually not
lobed; petiolar sinus wide, often urnshaped; teeth shallow. Flowers
fertile, mid-season; stamens upright.
Fruit early. Clusters large, long, broad, tapering, usually single-
shouldered, compact; pedicel slender with a few small warts; brush
long, light green. Berries large, round, dark purplish-black, glossy
with heavy bloom, firm; skin tender, cracks badly, adheres slightly,
contains dark red pigment, astringent. Flesh green, translucent,
juicy, fine-grained, tough, foxy, sweet, mild; good to very good. Seeds
adherent, one to five, large, broad, short, blunt, brown.
448 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING
WYOMING
(Labrusea)
Hopkins Early Red, Wilmington Red, Wyoming Red
Such value as Wyoming (Plate XXXII) possesses lies in the
hardiness, productiveness and healthiness of the vine. The ap-
pearance of the fruit is very good, the bunches are well formed
and composed of rich amber-colored berries of medium size.
The quality, however, is poor, being that of the wild Labrusca
in foxiness of flavor and in flesh characters. It is not nearly as
valuable as some other of the red Labruscas hitherto described
and can hardly be recommended either for the garden or the
vineyard. Wyoming was introduced by S. J. Parker of Ithaca,
New York, who states that it came from Pennsylvania in 1861.
Vine vigorous, hardy, healthy, productive. Canes numerous,
slender, dark reddish-brown covered with blue bloom; nodes enlarged,
frequently flattened; tendrils continuous, short, bifid. Leaves of
average size and thickness; upper surface light green, dull, smooth;
lower surface dull green with tinge of bronze, pubescent; lobes one to
three with terminus acute; petiolar sinus shallow, wide; basal sinus
usually wanting; lateral sinus shallow and wide when present; teeth
shallow. Flowers sterile, mid-season; stamens reflexed.
Fruit early, keeps well. Clusters slender, cylindrical, compact ;
pedicel short, slender with small warts; brush slender, pale green
with brown tinge. Berries medium, round, rich amber red with thin
bloom, persistent, firm; skin tender, adherent, astringent; flesh pale
green, translucent, juicy, tough, solid, strongly foxy, vinous; poor in
quality. Seeds adherent, one to three, slightly notched, ight brown.
INDEX
(Names of species, and synonyms of varietal names, are in italics.)
Actoni, 330.
Adaptations of stocks, 66.
Adlum, John, mentioned, 58.
Admirable, 373.
Adoxus obscurus, 216.
Aestivalis grapes, 11.
Affinity of stock and cion, 67.
Agawam, 331.
Air currents, 27.
Alabama, 401.
Alexander, 5, 6.
Alexander, 391.
Alicante, for forcing, 198.
Alleys, 75.
Almeria, 331.
Amadas & Barlowe, mentioned, 5.
America, 332.
American Muscadine, 435.
Aminia, 333.
Anaheim disease, 226.
Anthony, on grafting, 47.
Anthracnose, control of, 223.
description of, 223.
Aramon X Rupestris, 2, 64.
Arbors, training vines on, 142.
Arkansas, 345, 357.
Arnold’s Hybrid, 422.
Aspiran Blanc, 442.
August Giant, 333.
Bacchus, 324.
Bagging grapes, 293.
cost of, 294.
Bakator, 335.
Barbarossa, for forcing, 197.
Bark, structure of, 303.
Barry, 335.
Bartram, on the Alexander, 7.
2G
Beach Grape, 313.
Beacon, 336.
Beaconsfield, 346.
Beak defined, 308.
Bench grafting, 50.
essentials of, 50. '
operation of, 51.
preparing cuttings for, 51.
Berckmans, 337.
Berry, characters of, 308.
Bioletti, on callusing beds, 56.
on grafting, 48, 52.
on pruning in California, 151.
on resistant stocks, 63.
quoted, 18.
Bird Grape, 312.
Bitter-rot, 225.
Black Cape, 391.
Black Cornichon, 429.
Black Eagle, 338.
Black El Paso, 401.
Black German, 406.
Black Hamburg, for forcing, 197.
Black July, 401.
Black Malvoise, 339.
Black Morocco, 339.
Black Muscat, 415.
Black rot, control of, 320.
description of, 319.
Black Spanish, 401.
Bloom defined, 301.
Blooming dates of grapes, 288.
Blooming, time of, 305.
Blue French, 401.
Blue Grape, 318, 322.
Borders in graperies, making, 195.
care of, 195,
Bottsi, 382.
449
450
Bowed canes, 174.
Branches defined, 301.
Brighton, 340.
Brilliant, 341.
Brown, 342.
Brown French, 382.
Brush defined, 307.
Buckland Sweetwater, for forcing, 197.
Buds, characters of, 304.
defined, 304.
Bull, 435.
Bull, Ephraim W., mentioned, 9.
Bull Grape, 310.
Bullace, 435.
Bullace Grape, 310.
Bullet, 435.
Bullet Grape, 310.
Bullitt, 439.
Bunch Grape, 318.
Burgundy, 401.
Bush Grape, 312.
Bushy Grape, 310.
By-products of the grape, 269.
Callusing bed, 56.
Campbell Early, 342.
Canada, 348.
Canadian Hamburg, 422.
Canadian Hybrid, 422.
Canandaigua, 344.
Canandaigua Lake grape region, 21.
Cane-renewal, 116.
Canes, characters of, 303.
defined, 301.
disposition of, in pruning, 124.
Care of young vines, 87.
Carman, 344.
Catawba, 345.
history of, 8.
Catawba Tokay, 345.
Catch crops, 89, 90.
Cato, on grafting, 45.
quoted, 76.
Cayuga Lake grape region, 21.
Central Lake grape region, 20.
Chalaza defined, 308.
Champagne, 253.
Champagne industry, 21.
Champion, 346.
Chasselas Golden, 347.
Chasselas Doré, 347.
IN DEX
Chasselas Rose, 348.
Chautauqua, 348.
Chautauqua grape-belt, 18.
Chautauqua training, 125.
Cherokee, 345.
Chicken Grape, 317, 318.
Cigar Box Grape, 401.
Clevener, 349.
Climate and grape-growing, 23.
Clinton, 15, 350.
Colerain, 351.
Columbian Imperial, 351.
Columbian Jumbo, 351.
Commercial factors, 30.
Concord, 352.
history of, 9.
Constantia, 391.
Coéperative fertilizer
102.
Cordon pruning, 153.
Cordons, horizontal, 176.
vertical, 175.
Cottage, 354.
Coulure, 226.
Cover-crops, 89, 91.
Craponius inequalis, 217.
Cream of tartar, 270.
Cross-pollination, 284.
Croton, 355.
Crown-gall, 225.
Cryptosporella viticola, 224.
Cunningham, 356.
Cuttings, dormant, 38.
hard-wood, 38.
herbaceous, 42.
planting, 39.
single-eye, 40.
time to make, 38.
Cutting wood, selecting, 38.
Cut-worms on grapes, 315.
Cynthiana, 357.
experiments,
Dead-arm disease, control of, 324.
description of, 324.
Delaware, 11, 358.
Depth to plant, 86.
Desmia funeralis, 216.
Determinants of grape regions, 22.
Devereaux, 401.
Diamond, 359.
Diana, 360.
INDEX
Diaphragm, characters of, 303.
defined, 301:
Digging holes, 83.
Direct producers, 71.
Direction of rows, 74.
Distances in planting, 75.
Dodrelabi, 379.
Dorchester, 391.
Double-headed vines, 174.
Double Kniffin, 135
Downing, 361.
Downy mildew, control of, 222,
description of, 220.
Dracut Amber, 362.
Drainage for grapes, 28, 77.
Duck-shot Grape, 318.
Dunn, 382.
Dutchess, 362.
Dynamite in digging holes, 84.
Early Champion, 346.
Early Daisy, 363.
Early Ohio, 364.
Early Victor, 364.
Eaton, 365.
Eclipse, 366.
Eden, 367.
Egg Harbor grape region,
Eldorado, 368.
Elvira, 369.
Emasculating grape-flowers, 279.
Emperor, 369.
Empire State, 370.
Etta, 371.
Eumelan, 371.
European grapes, in eastern America,
184.
grafting, 186.
varieties for eastern America, 191.
Everbearing Grape, 312.
Exposures for grapes, 34.
99
mee
Factors limiting yield, 105.
Faith, 372.
Fall Grape, 318.
Fancher, 345.
Fan-training, 131.
Feher Szagos, 373.
Fern, 373.
Fern Munson, 373. °
Fertilizers, applying; 106.
451.
Fertiizers, — Continued.
effects on leaves, 102.
effects on vines, 102:
effects on yield, 101, 102
experiment, 98.
necessity of, 97.
when needed, 106.
Fidia viticida, 206.
Fitting land, 78.
Flame Tokay, 374.
Flesh, characters of, 308.
Florida Grape, 312.
Flowers, 373.
Flower, characters of, 305.
Fontainebleau, 347.
Fox Grape, 317, 324.
Fox Grape, 435.
Fox grapes, cultivation of, 7.
Foxiness defined, 307.
French Grape, 358.
Frost Grape, 317.
Frosts and grape-growing, 25.
Fruit-bearing, manner of, 113.
Fruit, characters of, 307.
parts of, 307.
Fungi, determinants of grape regions,
29.
Fungous diseases of the grape, 218.
Gaertner, 375.
Geneva, 376.
Gibbs Grape, 391.
Gladwin, on Chautauqua training,
126.
on Keuka training, 129.
on vineyard returns, 248.
Glomerella rufomacullans, 225.
““Go-devil,’”’ 119.
Goethe, 377.
Gold Coin, 377.
Golden Chasselas, 424.
Grading grapes, 235.
Grading land, 78.
Grafting, 45.
at New York Station, 46.
bundling grafts after, 55.
essentials of, 45.
European grapes, 186.
rooted cuttings, 56.
Grafted vineyards, care of, 48.
Grafting wax, 54.
452
Grafts, care of, in nursery, 58.
number made per hour, 56.
Grape, botany of, 300.
by-products of, 269.
domestication of, 1.
habitats of, 4.
habits of growth of, 302.
mutations in the, 60.
number of species of, 1.
organs of, 300.
pests of, 204.
products, 250.
Grape-berry moth, control of, 215.
life history of, 213.
Grape-breeding, 273.
results of, 282.
Grape-curculio, 217.
Grape hawk-moth, 217.
Grape-hybrids, 274.
Grape-juice, commercial making, 258.
development of industry, 257.
making at home, 262.
regions in which made, 257.
Grape leaf-folder, 216.
Grape leaf-hopper, control of, 213.
life history of, 211.
Grape regions, determinants of, 16.
in California, 18.
Grape root-worm, Californian, 216.
eastern, control of, 206.
life history of, 206.
Grape seedlings, 37.
Graperies, 193.
borders in, 195.
care of vines in, 201.
construction of, 193.
essentials of, 194.
heating, 194.
varieties for, 196.
ventilating, 194, 202.
watering, 202.
Grapes, American, 4.
classified as to self-fertility, 296.
domestic use of, 271.
European, 2.
forcing, 194.
immunity to disease, 303.
immunity to insects, 303.
propagation of, 37.
under glass, 192.
Grape-vinegar, 269.
INDEX
Grape-vine root-borer, 217.
Grape-vine flea-beetle, control of,
209.
life history of, 208.
Greeley, Horace, mentioned, 9.
Green Early, 378.
Green Mountain, 445.
Green Scuppernong, 435.
Grein Golden, 378.
Grizzly Frontignan, for forcing, 197.
Gros Colman, 379.
for forcing, 197.
Guignardia Bidwellii, 220.
Haltica chalybea, 209.
Hardiness of grapes, 302.
Hartford, 380.
Hartzell, mentioned, 213.
Harvesting, in California, 243.
in the East, 230.
Museadine grapes, 240.
Hawkins, Captain John, mentioned,
5
Hayes, 381.
Heading-back canes, 116.
Headlight, 281.
Heart-leaved Vitis, 317.
Heating vineyards, 25.
Heeling-in vines, 82.
Helene, 391.
Herbaceous cuttings, 42.
Herbemont, 12, 382.
Herbert, 383.
Hercules, 384.
Hermann grape region, 22.
Hickman, 435.
Hicks, 285.
Hidalgo, 385.
Highland, 386.
Hilgarde, 373.
Hilum defined, 308.
Hopkins, 387.
Hopkins Early Red, 448.
Horizontal cordons, 176.
Hosford, 388.
Hudson horizontal training, 141.
Hudson River grape region, 21.
Humidity in grape-growing, 25.
Hunt, 382.
Husmann, on making grape-juice, 258.
on raisin-making, 264.
INDEX 453
’ Husmann & Dearing, on harvesting | Lady Washington, 400.
Museadine grapes, 240. Lake Erie grape region, 22.
on pruning Muscadine grapes, 143. Laterals defined, 301.
Hybrid Franc, 388. Lawton grape region, 22.
Hybridizing grapes, 278. Layering, 42.
Hybrids, secondary, 276. dormant wood, 43.
essentials of, 43.
Ideal, 389. green wood, 44.
Improved Kniffin, 135. to fill vacancies, 44.
Inflorescences, number of, in species, | Laying down vines, 295.
304. Laying out vineyards, 74.
Insect pests, 204. — Leaf-margins, characters of, 307.
Insects as determinants of grape re-| Leaf, characters of, 307.
gions, 29. parts of, 306.
Internodes defined, 301. Lebanon, 345.
Tona, 390. Legaux, Peter, mentioned, 7.
Trrigation, 95. Leif the Lucky, mentioned, 5.
Isabella, 390. Lenoir, 13, 401.
Isabella, 391. Lignan Blanc, 403.
Isabella Seedling, 392. Lime, effects of, 101, 104.
Israella, 392. Lincoln, 345.
Ives, 393. Lindley, 402.
Listan Blanc, 402.
Jack, 401. Little Grape, 318.
James, 394. Little Winter Grape, 318.
Janesville, 394. Long, 356.
Jaques, 401. Longworth, Nicholas, mentioned, 8.
Jarring Muscadine grapes, 241. Lucile, 403.
Jefferson, 395. Luglienga, 402.
Jefferson, Thomas, on native grapes, 5. | Lutie, 404.
Jessica, 396.
Jewel, 397. Macrodactylus subspinosus, 210.
Joannenc, 402. Malaga, 405.
Jordan, 415. Mammoth Catawba, 435.
July Sherry, 401. Marion, 406.
Marion Port, 406.
Kay’s Seedling, 382. Marketing, 230, 246.
Keller’s White, 345. cooperative, 246.
Kensington, 398. Markets, accessibility, 30.
Kentucky Vineyard Society, 7. general versus local, 31.
Keuka Lake grape region, 21. Marking for planting, 79.
King, 399. Martha, 407.
Kittredge, 393. Massasoit, 408.
Kniffin, Wm., mentioned, 132. Maxatawney, 409.
McKee, 382.
Labels for packages, 238. McPike, 405.
Labor, determinant of grape regions, | Mead’s Seedling, 345.
32. Mealy-bug, 202.
Ladies’ Choice, 358. Memory, 409.
Lady, 399. Memythrus polistiformis, 217.
Lady Downs, for forcing, 198. Mendel’s laws, 281.
454 INDEX
Merceron, 345. Oporto, 422.
Merrimac, 410. Othello, 422.
Michigan, 345. Ozark, 423.
Mildew in graperies, 203.
Mills, 411. Packages for California, 245.
Mish, 411. for eastern America, 236.
Mission, 412. for Muscadine grapes, 243.
Missouri Riesling, 413. Packing houses, 233.
Montefiore, 413. construction of, 234.
Moore Early, 414. cost of, 233.
Moore, Jacob, mentioned, 276. Packing, in the East, 237.
Moscatello, 415. Muscadine grapes, 241.
Moscatello Black, 415. Packing tables, 234.
Mountain Grape, 313, 318. Palomino, 424.
Moyer, 415. Paw Paw grape region, 22.
Moyer’s Early Red, 415. Payne's Early, 391.
Muncy, 345. Peabody, 424.
Munson, mentioned, 277. Pedicel defined, 305.
on pruning, 136. Peduncle defined, 305.
on resistant species, 63. Perfection, 425.
Munson method of pruning, 136. Pergolas, training vines on, 142.
Muscadine Grape, 310. Perkins, 426.
Muscadine, 435. Pests in graperies, 202.
Muscadine grapes for wine, 256. Petiole, characters of, 307.
Muscatel, 416. Pholus achemon, 217.
Muscat Hamburg, 417. Phosphorus, benefits from, 101.
for forcing, 197. Phylloxera, 13, 61, 205. J
Muscat of Alexandria, 418. control of, 206.
Mustang Grape, 323. Phylloxera vastatrix, 205.
of Florida, 312. Pickers, 231.
Mutations in improving grapes, 277. Picking, accounts for, 232.
appliances, 232.
time of, 231.
+ | Pigeon Grape, 318.
Pine-wood Grape, 320.
Piquette, making, 270,
Napoleon I, mentioned, 196.
Neal, 382.
Niagara, 418.
Niagara grape region, 20. :
Nitrogen, benefits from, 101. arise tee
Noah, 419. Pane
grafted vines, 68.
in graperies, 198.
Plasmopara viticola, 220.
Pliny, mentioned, 2.
Plowing the vineyard, 94.
to combat pests, 95.
Pocklington, 426.
Pollen, characters of, 306.
Pollinating in hybridizing, 280.
Polychrosis viteana, 214.
Pomace as a by-product, 270,
Ohio, 401. Possum Grape, 317.
Ohio River grape region, 22. Posts, 119.
Nodes defined, 301.
Nodosities, 66.
Northern Astivalis, 322.
Northern Muscadine, 420.
Northern Summer Grape, 322.
Norton, 421.
Norton, Dr. D. N., mentioned, 11.
Noyes, Dr., mentioned, 15.
Number of vines to the acre, 76.
INDEX
Posts, — Continued.
bracing, 120.
material, 119.
setting, 120.
Post-oak Grape, 320.
Post-oak grapes, 13.
Potassium, benefits from, 101.
Poughkeepsie, 427.
Powdery mildew, control of, 223.
description of, 222.
Powell, 358.
Pre-cooling grapes, 245.
Prentiss, 428. :
Preparation for planting, 76, 82.
Preparing vines for planting, 80, 81.
Prince Edward, 356.
Prince, W. R., mentioned, 274.
Profits from fertilizers, 101.
Pruning, before planting, 160.
cordon method, 153.
European grapes in eastern America,
107.
fan-shaped, 153, 172.
first summer, 160.
first winter, 161.
for fruit, 112.
for wood, 112.
in eastern America, 108.
Muscadine grapes, 143.
on the Pacific slope, 150.
principles of, 111.
second summer, 161.
second winter, 163.
single vertical cordon, 157.
summer, 115.
third summer, 167.
third winter, 168.
to regulate the crop, 110.
to regulate the vine, 111.
unilateral horizontal cordon, 158.
vase-form, 153.
winter, 114.
work of, 118.
Pruning and training distinguished, 109.
Prunings, collecting, 118.
Purple Cornichon, 429.
Quality defined, 307.
Raffa, in grafting, 54.
Raisin industry, seat of, 263.
Raisin-making, account of, 264.
Raisin output, value of, 263.
Raisins, classes of, 266.
dipping and scalding, 264.
packing, 265.
seeded, 267.
varieties for, 263.
Randall, 331.
Raphe defined, 308.
Rating as to resistance to pieiloxeer!
66.
Rattling, 224.
Rebecca, 429.
Reciprocal influence of stock and cion,
68.
Red Eagle, 430.
Red River, 357.
Red-spider in graperies, 202.
Refrigerator cars for grapes, 245.
Regal, 431.
Rejuvenating old vines, 147.
Renewal by canes, 116.
by spurs, 117.
Renewing fruiting wood, 116.
Requa, 431.
Returns from Muscadine grapes, 242.
Ricketts, J. H., mentioned, 274.
Ringing grape vines, 289.
operation of, 290.
results of, 291.
theory of, 290.
Riparia Gloire, 64, 65.
Riparia grande glabre, 64, 65.
Riparia Solonis, 64.
Ripening dates for grapes, 296.
Ripe-rot, control of, 225.
description of, 225.
River Grape, 314.
Riverbank Grape, 314.
Riverbank grapes, 13.
Riverside Grape, 314.
Roanoke, 435.
Robins, depredations of, 293.
Rochester, 432.
Rock Grape, 313.
Rogers, E. S., mentioned, 274.
Rommel, 433.
Rommel, Jacob, mentioned, 276.
Root, its parts named, 301.
Root-forms of grapes, 67.
Rootlets defined, 301.
456 INDEX
Root-tip defined, 301.
Rosaki, 433.
Rose chafer, control of, 211.
life history of, 210.
Rose of Peru, 4384.
Rose of Tennessee, 345.
Rotundifolia grapes, 9.
Ruff, 358.
Rupestris St. George, 64.
Salem, 435.
Sand Grape, 313.
Sandusky grape region, 22.
Sanitation in the vineyard, 227.
Saratoga, 345.
Scuppernong, 310, 435.
Seasonal sum of heat, 24.
Secretary, 436.
Seedlings, selecting, 37.
Seeds, as by-products, 271.
characters of, 308.
parts of, 308.
Selecting vines, 81.
Selection in improving grapes, 277.
Self-sterility in grapes, 285.
cause of, 286.
remedy for, 287.
Senasqua, 437.
Seneca Lake grape region, 21.
Shelling, 424.
Shipping from California, 245.
Shoots, characters of, 303.
defined, 301.
disposition of, in training, 123.
drooping, in training, 132.
horizontal, in training, 141.
upright, in training, 125.
Single-eye cuttings, 40.
making, 41.
planting, 41.
Single-stem, Four-cane Kniffin, 132.
Singleton, 345.
Single vertical cordon, 157.
Sites for vineyards, 26, 32.
Skin, characters of, 308.
Smith, Captain John, mentioned, 5.
Smudging vineyards, 25.
Soil adaptations, 29.
fertility, 28.
Soils for grapes, 27.
ideal, 28.
Soils for grapes, — Continued.
over-rich, 107.
uneven, 105.
Sour Winter Grape, 317.
Southern Astivalis, 321.
Southern Fox Grape, 310.
Spanish Grape, 318.
Species, conspectus of, 310.
resistant to phylloxera, 62.
Sphaceloma ampelinum, 223.
Sports in improving grapes, 277.
Spraying suggestions, 228.
Springstein, 401.
Spurs defined, 301.
Spur-renewal, 117.
Staking vines, 162.
Stamens, characters of, 306.
Stem defined, 301.
its parts named, 301.
Stocks, resistant to phylloxera, 61.
for American grapes, 69.
for European grapes, 69.
Storage-room for grapes, 239.
Storing grapes, 238.
Stripping, 118.
Suckers defined, 301.
Sugar Grape, 313.
Sultana, 438.
Sultanina, 438.
Summer Grape, 318.
Summer grapes, 11.
Summer pruning, 115.
Swamp Grape, 318.
Sweet-scented Grape, 314.
Sweetwater, 347.
Syrian, for forcing, 198.
Talman’s Seedling, 346.
Tap-root defined, 301.
Taylor, 439.
Tekomah, 343.
Tendrils, characters of, 304.
defined, 301.
Theophrastus, on grafting, 45.
Thinning in graperies, 201.
Thompson's Seedless, 438.
Thrips, 211.
in graperies, 202.
Tillage, 92.
methods, 93.
time to cease, 95.
INDEX
Tillage, — Continued.
tools for, 93.
Time to plant, 84.
Tokay, 345.
Tongue grafting, 52.
Training, Chautauqua method, 125.
classification of methods, 125.
in eastern America, 123.
fan-method, 131.
in graperies, 198.
Keuka method, 139.
Trellises, 119.
Triumph, 440.
Tuberosities,
66.
Turkey Grape, 320.
Two-trunk Kniffin, 135.
Tying, 122.
Typhlocyba comes, 211.
caused by phylloxera,
Ulster, 441.
Umbrella Kniffin, 134.
Uncinula necator, 222.
Unilateral horizontal cordon, 158.
Valk, Dr., mentioned, 274.
Varieties of European grapes for eastern
America, 191.
Varieties resistant to phylloxera, 62.
Verdal, 442.
Vergennes, 442.
Vertical canes, 174.
cordons, 175.
Vinegar from grapes, 269.
Vines, nursery versus home grown,
59.
“pedigreed,” 59.
rejuvenating old, 147.
resistant to phylloxera, 61.
young, care of, 87.
Vineyard grafting, in eastern America,
45.
on Pacific slope, 48.
Vineyard, management, 73.
returns in the Hast, 247.
sanitation, 227.
sites, 32.
Vintage, time of, 254.
Virgil, on soils, 28,
quoted, 31, 34, 37.
Virginia Amber, 345.
457
Vitis, genus defined, 308.
Vitis estivalis, 11, 318.
Bourquiniana, 11, 321.
glauca, 321.
Lincecumii, 13, 320.
Berlandieri, 318.
bicolor, 322.
candicans, 323.
cordifolia, 317.
Labrusca, 7, 324.
Munsoniana, 312.
riparia, 314. (Syn. of V. vulpina.)
rotundifolia, 9, 310.
rupestris, 313.
vinifera, 2, 328.
vulpina, 314.
Vulpina grapes, 13.
as direct producers, 13.
Wakeman, Elbert, mentioned, 136.
Walter, 443.
Warren, 382, 401.
Warrenton, 382.
Washington, 371.
Water, influence
Bs
Watering, at planting, 86.
in graperies, 202.
Water sprouts defined, 301.
Weather data and _ grape-growing,
26.
White July, 402.
White Nice, for forcing, 198.
White Frontignan, 416.
Wilder, 444.
Wilmington Red, 448.
Winchell, 445.
Windbreaks
Dl
Wine, aging, 253.
crushing grapes for, 252.
fermentation of, 253.
fining, 253.
kinds of, 251.
racking, 253.
yeasts for, 253.
Wine-grapes, prices paid for, 255.
Wine-making, 252.
Wire for trellises, 121.
Wire grafting, 54.
Winter Grape, 314, 317, 318.
of, on climate,
in grape-growing, 25,
458 INDEX
Winter-killing, 26. Worthington, 15, 350.
precautions against, 295. Wyoming, 448.
Winter protection of grapes, 187, 294. | Wyoming Red, 448.
cost of, 296.
Winter-pruning, 114.
Woodruff, 446. Yields in fertilizer experiments, 100,
Woodward, 391. 101.
Worden, 446. Y-trunk Kniffin training, 136.
Printed in the United States of America.
HE following pages contain advertisements of a
few of the Macmillan books on kindred subjects.
A NEW RURAL MANUAL
Epirep By L. H. BAILEY
Manual of Tree Diseases
By W. HOWARD RANKIN, A.B., Pa.D.
Assistant Professor of Plant Pathology
New York State College of Agriculture, at Cornell University
Illustrated, tr2mo, $2.50
The diseases of the more common trees of the United
States are treated in this volume. The discussions of these
diseases are grouped into chapters under the common name
of the trees affected, and the chapters are arranged alpha-
betically. In a general chapter are included discussions of
the diseases common to all kinds of trees, such as samping-
off of seedlings, temperature injuries to leaves and woody
parts, smoke and gas injuries, wood-rots, and the like. The
species of trees affected, the geographic distribution, de-
structiveness, and symptoms of the different diseases are
presented in full.
The aim of the authors has been to furnish a descriptive
guide for the diagnosis of tree diseases and the general
methods of their control.
CONTENTS
Seedling Diseases and Injuries ; Leaf Diseases and Injuries ; Body
and Branch Diseases and Injuries; Root Diseases and Injuries ;
Diseases of :
Alder; Arbor-Vite; Ash; Bald Cypress; Basswood; Beech;
Birch: Buckeye; Butternut; Catalpa; Cedar; Chestnut; Elm;
Fir; Hackberry; Hemlock; Hickory; Juniper; Larch; Locust;
Maple; Oak; Pine; Poplar; Spruce: Sycamore; Walnut; Willow.
Tree Surgery; Spraying and Dusting for Leaf Diseases.
THE MACMILLAN COMPANY
Publishers 64-66 Fifth Avenue New York
A NEW RURAL MANUAL
Epitep sy L. H. BAmEY
Manual of Vegetable-Garden Insects
By CYRUS RICHARD CROSBY
AND
MORTIMER DEMAREST LEONARD
Of the New York State College of Agriculture, at Cornell University
Illustrated, t2mo, $2.50
This is a practical account of the principal insects which attack
truck and vegetable crops, including cabbages, cauliflowers, cucum-
bers and melons, asparagus, potatoes, tomatoes, celery and parsnips,
lettuce, peas, beans, beets, spinach, sweet-potatoes, and sweet corn.
The life-history and habits of each insect are given, its injuries de-
scribed and the methods of control are discussed. A chapter on
insecticides gives an account of the more important materials now
employed, with directions for their preparation and use.
CONTENTS
I. General Considerations.
II. Insects Injurious to Cabbage and Related Crops.
III. Pea and Bean Insects.
IV. Beet and Spinach Insects.
V. Insects Injurious to Cucumber, Squash, and Melon,
VI. Potato Insects.
VII. Tomato Insects.
VIII. Eggplant Insects.
IX. Insects Injurious to Carrot, Celery, Parsnip, etc.
X. Asparagus Insects.
XI. Corn Insects.
XII. Sweet Potato Insects.
XIII. Onion Insects.
XIV. Insects Injurious to Minor Vegetable Crop,
XV. Cutworms and Army Worms.
XVI. Blister-Beetles,
XVII. Flea-Beetles.
XVIII. Unclassified Pests.
XIX. Insects and Insecticides.
THE MACMILLAN COMPANY
Publishers 64-66 Fifth Avenue New York
A NEW VOLUME IN THE RURAL SCIENCE SERIES
EpiteD BY L. H. BAmey
Peach-Growing
By H. P. GOULD
Pomologist in charge of Fruit Production Investigations
Bureau of Plant Industry, U. S. Department of Agriculture
Illustrated, t2mo, $2.00
Here is a book which covers the general field of growing peaches
and placing them within reach of the consumer.
It is practical. It is detailed. It is a handbook for peach-growers
of North and East, as well as South and West.
Peach literature has been notably limited, except for experiment
station bulletins and reports. This book gathers into one compact,
fully illustrated volume the principles and practice of successful
peach production.
CONTENTS
I. Historical Notes.
II. Economic Status and Extent of the Peach Industry.
lil. Location and Site of the Orchard.
IV. Propagation of Peach Trees.
V. Details of Planting an Orchard,
VI. Orchard Management.
Vil. The Tillage of Peach Orchards,
VIII. Inter-planted Crops.
IX. Fertilizers for Peach Orchards,
X. Pruning Peach Trees.
XI. Insect and Disease Control.
XII. Thinning the Fruit.
XIII. Irrigating Peaches.
XIV. A Consideration of Adverse Temperatures,
XV. Annual Cost Factors in Growing Peaches.
XVI. Peach Varieties, Botany and Classification.
XVII. Picking and Packing the Fruit.
XVIII. Transportation, Storage, Marketing.
THE MACMILLAN COMPANY
Publishers 64-66 Fifth Avenue New York
The Standard Cyclopedia of Horticulture
Epirep By L. H. BAILEY
WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF OVER 500 COLLABORATORS
New edition, entirely rewritten and enlarged, with many new features; with
24 plates in color, 96 full-page half tones, and over 4,000 text illustra-
tions. Complete in six volumes. Sold only in sets.
Set cloth, $36.00 Leather, $60.00
“The Standard Cyclopedia of Horticulture,” pronounced by ex-
perts to be an absolute necessity for every horticulturist and of
tremendous value to every type of gardener, professional and ama-
teur, is completed. ‘An indispensable work of reference to every
one interested in the land and its products, whether commercially or
professionally, as a student or an amateur,” is the Boston Transcript’s
characterization of it, while Hortzculture adds that “it is very live
literature for any one engaged in any department of the horticultural
field.”
“This really monumental performance will take rank as a stand-
ard in its class. Illustrations and text are admirable. ... Our
own conviction is that while the future may bring forth amplified
editions of the work, it will probably never be superseded. Recog-
nizing its importance, the publishers have given it faultless form.
The typography leaves nothing to be desired, the paper is calcu-
lated to stand wear and tear, and the work is at once handsomely
and attractively bound.” — Mew York Daily Tribune.
THE MACMILLAN COMPANY
Publishers 64-66 Fifth Avenue New York
THE RURAL MANUALS
Epitep By L. H. BAILEY
MANUAL OF VEGETABLE-GARDEN INSECTS
By CYRUS RICHARD CROSBY
AND
MORTIMER DEMAREST LEONARD
Of the New York State College of Agriculture, at Cornell University
Illustrated, t2mo, $2.50
MANUAL OF TREE DISEASES
By W. HOWARD RANKIN, A.B., Pa.D.
Assistant Professor of Plant Pathology
New York State College of Agriculture at Cornell University
Illustrated, t2mo, $2.50
MANUAL OF MILK PRODUCTS
By W. A. STOCKING, Jr.
Illustrated, 12mo, $2.00
MANUAL OF FRUIT DISEASES
By L. R. HESSLER anp H. H. WHETZEL
Illustrated, 12mo, $2.00
THE PRUNING MANUAL
By L. H. BAILEY
Illustrated, 12mo, 407 pages, $2.00
MANUAL OF FRUIT INSECTS
By MARK VERNON SLINGERLAND anv CYRUS R. CROSBY
Of the New York State College of Agriculture, at Cornell University
Illustrated, 12mo, 503 pages, $2.00
A MANUAL OF WEEDS
By ADA E. GEORGIA
Assistant in the Farm Course, New York State College of Agriculture, Cornell University
With 385 illustrations by F. ScouYLER MATHEWS
Illustrated, cloth, t12mo, 503 pages, index, $2.00
MANUAL OF FARM ANIMALS
A PracticaL GUIDE TO THE CHOOSING, BREEDING, AND KEEP OF Horses, CATTLE,
SHEEP, AND SWINE
By MERRITT W. HARPER
Assistant Professor of Animal Husbandry in the New York State College of Agriculture
at Cornell University
Illustrated, 12mo, 545 pages, index, $2.00
MANUAL OF GARDENING
A PracricAL GUIDE TO THE MAKING OF HOME GROUNDS AND THE GROWING OF
FLOWERS, Fruits, AND VEGETABLES FOR HOME USE
By LH. BAILEY
Illustrated, cloth, t2mo, 544 pages, $2.00
THE FARM AND GARDEN RULE BOOK
By L. H. BAILEY
Revised and enlarged edition; illustrated, cloth, 12mo, $2.00
THE MACMILLAN COMPANY
Publishers 64-66 Fifth Avenue New York