AMERICAN | GROWING De (-Xebu (ola THR RURAL MANGA. 8 LP CAILEY* Barres GoprightNo. COPYRIGHT DEPOSI: inane ag ete. \wh a ever .5 A val aes ‘ " ve. ae eee S The Rural Manuals Epitrep spy L. H. BAILEY MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING The Rural Manuals EpitEep sy L. H. BAILEY * MANUAL OF GARDENING — Bailey Manuat oF Farm ANIMALS — Harper FarM AND GARDEN Ru e-Book — Bailey Manvat oF Fruit Insects — Slingerland and Crosby ManuaL oF WrEDs — Georgia THE Pruninec-ManuaL — Bailey Manuva or Fruir Disrases — Hesler and Whetzel Manuva oF Mitk Propucts — Stocking MaANnvuAL OF VEGETABLE-GARDEN INnsEcCTs — Crosby and Leonard ManuaL oF TREE Diseases — Rankin Manuva or Home-Maxine —Van Rensselaer, Rose, and Canon MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING — Hedrick MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING BY U. P. HEDRICK HORTICULTURIST OF THE NEW YORK AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION New Bork THE MACMILLAN COMPANY 1919 All rights reserved Coryriext, 1919, By THE MACMILLAN COMPANY. Set up and electrotyped. Published June, 1919. JUL -7 1919 Norwood ress J. 8. Cushing Co. — Berwick & Smith Co. Norwood, Mass., U.S.A. ©OlaAs529112 PREFACE SEVENTY-NINE books on grapes enrich the pomology of North America, not counting numerous state and national publications. Pomological writers in America have been partial to the grape, for other fruits do not fare nearly so well. Twenty-two books are devoted to the strawberry, fourteen to the apple, to the peach nine, cranberry eight, plum five, pear nine, quince two, loganberry one, while the cherry, raspberry, and blackberry are not once separated from other fruits in special books. Thus, though a comparative newcomer among the fruits of the country, the grape has been singled out for a treatise more times than all other fruits of temperate climates combined — seventy-nine books on the grape, seventy on all other fruits. This statement of partiality does not lead to an apology for a new book on the grape. There is urgent need for a new book. But three of the seventy-nine treatises on this fruit are con- temporary, and all but one, a handbook on training, are records from vanished minds. Methods change so rapidly and varieties multiply so fast, that to keep pace there must be new books on fruits every few years. Besides, the types of grapes are so diverse, and different soils, climates, and treatments produce such widely dissimilar results, that many books are required to do justice to this fruit — the vineyard should be seen through many eyes. Commercial grape-growing is now a great industry in America, and deserves a treatise of its own. But there are also many demands for information on grape-growing by those who grow fruits for pleasure, especially by those who are escaping from Vv wf vi PREFACE cities to suburban homes, for the grape is a favorite fruit of the amateur. And so, though Pleasure and Profit are a hard team to drive together, this manual is written for both com- mercial and amateur grape-growers. In particular, the needs of the amateur are recognized in the chapter on varieties, where many sorts are described which have little or no commercial value. No other fruit offers the enchantment of novelty to be found in the grape. Alluring flavors, sizes, and colors abound, of which the amateur wants samples. The commercial grower who plants but one variety often finds himself dissatisfied with the humdrum of the business. He should emulate the amateur and plant more kinds, if only for pleasure; remembering the adage, “No profit grows where is no pleasure ta’en.” Greater pleasure in grape-growing, then, is offered as the justification of the long chapter on varieties. At the risk of too broad spreading, the author discusses, in a book mainly devoted to native grapes, the culture of European grapes in the far West. The chief aim is, of course, to set forth information that will be helpful to growers of these grapes in the western states, there being no treatises to which western growers can refer, other than bulletins from state and national agricultural institutions. There is, however, another reason for attempting to cover the whole field of grape-growing in America. It is certain that eastern grape-growers will some- time grow European grapes. Western vineyards might well be enlarged with plantings of native grapes. On the sup- position, then, that the culture of both European and native grapes is to become less and less restricted in America, the author has ventured to discuss the culture of all grapes for all parts of North America. In the preparation of this manual, the author’s “The Grapes of New York,” a book long out of print and never widely distributed, has been laid under heavy contribution, especially PREFACE vil in the description of varieties. Acknowledgments are due to F. Z. Hartzell for reading the chapter on Grape Pests and their Control and for furnishing most of the photographs used in making illustrations of insects and fungi; to F. E. Gladwin for similar help in preparing the two chapters on pruning and training the grape in eastern America; to Frederic T. Bioletti for permission to republish from a bulletin written by him from the Agricultural Experiment Station of California almost the whole chapter on Grape Pruning on the Pacific Slope; and to O. M. Taylor and to R. D. Anthony for very material assistance in reading the manuscript and proofs. U. P. Heprick. GENEVA, N. Y., Jan. 1, 1919. VI Vil Vil IX X XI XII XII XIV XV XVI XVII XVII TABLE OF CONTENTS THe DoMESTICATION OF THE GRAPE GRAPE REGIONS AND THEIR DETERMINANTS PROPAGATION Stocks AND REsISTANT VINES . THE VINEYARD AND ITS MANAGEMENT FERTILIZERS FOR GRAPES . PRUNING THE GRAPE IN EASTERN AMERICA TRAINING THE GRAPE IN EASTERN AMERICA GRAPE-PRUNING ON THE PaciFic Coast EvurRoPpEAN GRAPES IN EASTERN AMERICA GRAPES UNDER GLASS GRAPE PESTS AND THEIR CONTROL MARKETING GRAPES GRAPE PRopUCTS GRAPE BREEDING MISCELLANIES GRAPE Botany . VARIETIES OF GRAPES ix 108 123 150 184 192 204 230 250 273 284 300 330 4 4 ~ ; a % : LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS PLATES PLATE PAGE I. Two views of vineyards in California; a vineyard in the orchard region of central California, and a vineyard in southern California. : R d ‘ : =, SLA Il. Fitting the land for planting . 3 ‘ : ; . d4e III. Cover-crop; cow-horn turnips, andrye . : ¥ - 486 IV. A well-tilled vineyard of Concords . : i 60 V. Vinifera grapes grown out of doors in New York; “Mal- vasia and Chasselas Golden . , ‘ : , ee VI. Black Hamburg : : ‘ P : : ; 2.1829 VII. Barry. Delaware . ! : : : ‘ : 1 G6) VIII. Brighton . : . : , : : : : « 106% IX. Campbell Early : : : : : é H Mage 1 ead X. Clinton . ; : : : , ‘ s ; » 122" XI. Concord . : ; : ; : : : : ; ‘lass XII. Diana ‘ é 3 : i . : é : . 148+ XIII. Dutchess . ; : : ; : ‘ : : . 164 XIV. Eaton ‘ : - ; ? . s t : ~ ViBZ XV. Eclipse. : ‘ : ‘ , : A : . 190° XVI. Elvira. : ? : : : 3 5 ‘ 1 $202" XVII. Empire State . : : : : : : : . BS XVIII. Herbert . : é : : F E E ; » 228% XIX. Iona ; : : 3 Y ; : : : . Base XX. Isabella . 2 ; : : , . e : . ieee XXI. Jefferson . : : : : : : : : » 2B2y XXII. Lindley. Lucile. : : : : ; : . 298 XXIII. Lutie. Pocklington P : ; : ; z . 328% XXIV. Moore Early . ; : ; : : . : . 340 ¥ xii LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS PLATE PAGE XXV. Muscat Hamburg . A : s " : 5 . 350% XXVI. Niagara . : : : a : : : : . 360° XXVII. Salem : : : ‘ , ; . : : .. 340 XXVIII. Triumph . ‘ : ‘ ; ‘ : ; : . 380° XXIX. Vergennes 5 : ; : : : ; : Ree | ues XXX. Winchell . ; : ‘ ‘ P : 4 : . 400° XXXI. Worden . : ‘ ; ; : : F : . 416v XXXII. Wyoming , ‘ , ; : ; ‘ ‘ - 432% FIGURES IN THE TEXT FIGURE 1. A shoot of Vitis wnifera . , : : : : : f 3 2. A shoot of Vitis Labrusca . : : 2 , : A : 6 3. A shoot of Vitis rotundifolia : : , : E 2 = ae 4. A shoot of Vitis estivalis . ‘ : : ; ; ; , ale 5. A shoot of Vitis vulpina ; : : : ‘ : Mee 6. Planting cuttings : ; : 2 ; : : . ap 7. A cutting beginning nak, : : ; : : : . 40 8. Cutting off the trunk ; : : ‘ ; : : . 46 9. Cutting the cleft d ; ; : : : : c 4G 10. Inserting the cion : 3 ; : j . : : = Jan 11. The completed graft : : 47 12. Bench-grafted cuttings of grape, iowate tse cleft-graft ae the whip-graft. (Adapted from Husmann) . : : F. SOlk 13. Vine ready for pruning ; ‘ ; : : : ‘ o 13 14. A “‘go-devil”’ for collecting prunings : é f « 29 15. A trellis and a common method of bracing end adats ; - 120 16. Chautauqua training; vine ready to prune ; ; : e157 17. Keuka method of training ‘ : ; : ; : . 130 18. Single-stem four-cane Kniffin training . : ' F gt dee 19. Umbrella method of training. ; : : f ; . 134 20. Two-trunk Kniffin training : 3 : potlioa 21. Rotundifolia vines trained by the ov ery method ‘ . 144 22. A Rotundifolia vine trained by the 6-arm renewal method . 145 23. Forms of head pruning : : : ; : = ; v~ 154 bo RSS . Forms of head pruning 2 : ‘ ; ‘ ; ; . 155 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS xiii 1URE PAGE . Head pruning: fan-shaped head; fruit canes tied to horizontal trellis. : ; ; : ; : . SLB6 . Single vertical cordon saith aisteeotice : ‘ F : * Se . Unilateral horizontal cordon with fruit-spurs —. : ‘ » i158 . Three-year-old vine ready for pruning : : . . 169 . Vine of Fig. 28 after pruning for vase-formed aad : : . 169 . Three-year-old vines: A, pruned for a vase-formed, and B, for a fan-shaped head 170 . Four-year-old vine pruned for eae niol feud 171 . Four-year-old vine pruned for high vase-formed head 172 . Fan-shaped vines: A, before pruning; B, after pruning 173 . Vertical cordon, young vine pruned 176 . Unilateral horizontal cordon with half-long pruning 77 )}. Leaf-galls of the phylloxera 05 F . The grape root-worm [2N bw Ww Fe 5 ;. Root-worm beetle j 07 ). Injuries caused by beetles of ite 28 endo 207 ). Eggs of grape-vine flea-beetle : 209 |. First four stages of the grape leaf-hopper . : a 12 ». The fifth and the mature stages of the grape ipabhappet : £2 ;. A bunch of grapes despoiled by the grape-berry moth : . 214 1. Work of black-rot of the grape . : : : 3 : =. 219 ». Grapes attacked by downy-mildew_ . ; ; 3 , . 221 }. Packing grapes on a packing-table_. : ; ‘ ; . 234 7. Climax baskets in two sizes ; 5 - : é ; . 236 3. William Robert Prince 3 - : : ; ‘ : i= Bt4 ). E.S. Rogers é : ; ; ; : ‘ : P : 200 ). T. V. Munson . : ; , : «AE |. Staminate and perfect — aiiiataed onone vine. 285 2. Ringing grape-vines; a pes tools for ringing and oe vines . : F > : - . 292 3. A grape flower; aceiig the opening cap and stamens. . 306 1. Grape flowers; showing upright and depressed stamens. . 3806 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE- GROWING CHAPTER I THE DOMESTICATION OF THE GRAPE Tue domestication of an animal or a plant is a milestone in the advance of agriculture and so becomes of interest to every human being. But, more particularly, the materials, the events and the men who direct the work of domestication are of interest to those who breed and care for animals and plants; the grape- grower should find much profit in the story of the domestication of thegrape. Whatwas the raw material of a fruit known since the beginning of agriculture and wherever temperate fruits are grown? How has this material been fashioned into use? Who were the originative and who the directive agents? These are fundamental questions in the improvement of the grape, answers to which will also throw much light on the culture of it. Botanists number from forty to sixty species of grapes in the world. ‘These are widely distributed in the northern hemi- sphere, all but a few being found in temperate countries. Thus, more than half of the named species come from the United States and Canada, while nearly all of the others are from China and Japan, with but one species certainly growing wild in southwestern Asia and bordering parts of Europe. All true grapes have more or less edible fruits, and of the twenty or more species grown in the New World more than half have been or are being domesticated. Of the Old World grapes, only one B : 2 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING species is cultivated for fruit, but this, of all grapes, is of greatest economic importance and, therefore, deserves first consideration. THE EuROPEAN GRAPE The European grape, Vitis vinifera (Fig. 1), is the grape of ancient and modern agriculture. It is the vine which Noah planted after the Deluge ; the vine of Israel and of the Promised Land ; the vine of the parables in the New Testament. It is the grape and the vine of the myths, fables, poetry and prose of all peoples. It is the grape from which the wines of the world are made. From it come the raisins of the world. It is the chief agricultural crop of southern Europe and northern Africa and of vast regions in other parts of the world, having followed civilized man from place to place in all temperate climates. The European grape has so impressed itself on the human mind that when one thinks or speaks of the grape, or of the vine, it is this Old World species, the vine of antiquity, that presents itself. The written records of the cultivation of the European grape go back five or six thousand years. The ancient Egyptians, Pheenicians, Greeks and Romans grew the vine and made wine from its fruit. Grape seeds have been found in the remains of European peoples of prehistoric times, showing that primitive men enlivened their scanty fare with wild grapes. Cultivation of the grape in the Old World probably began in the region about the Caspian Sea where the vine has always run wild. We have proof of the great antiquity of the grape in Egypt, for its seeds are found entombed with the oldest mummies. Probably the Pheenicians, the earliest navigators on the Mediterranean, carried the grape from Egypt and Syria to Greece, Rome and other countries bordering on this sea. The domestication of the grape was far advanced in Christ’s time, for Pliny, writing then, describes ninety-one kinds of grapes and fifty kinds of wine. THE DOMESTICATION OF THE GRAPE 3 It can never be known exactly when the European grape came under cultivation. There is no word as to what were the methods and processes of domestication, and whose the minds and hands that remodeled the wild grape of Europe into the Fic. 1. A shoot of Vitis vinifera. 4 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING grape of the vineyards. The Old World grape was domesti- cated long before the faint traditions which have been trans- mitted to our day could possibly have arisen. For knowledge of how wild species of this fruit have been and may be brought under cultivation, we must turn to New World records. AMERICAN GRAPES Few other plants in the New World grow wild under such varied conditions and over such extended areas as the grape. Wild grapes are found in the warmer parts of New Brunswick ; on the shores of the Great Lakes; everywhere in the wood- lands of the North and Middle Atlantic states; on the limestone soils of Kentucky, Tennessee and the Virginias; and they thrive in the sandy woods, sea plains and reef-keys of the South Atlantic and Gulf states. While not so common west of the Mississippi, yet some kind of wild grape is found from North Dakota to Texas; grapes grow on the mountains and in the cafions of all the Rocky Mountain states; and several species thrive on the Mexican borders and in the far Southwest. While it is possible that all American grapes have descended from an original species, the types are now as diverse as the regions they inhabit. The wild grapes of the forests have long slender trunks and branches, whereby their leaves are better exposed to the sunlight. Two shrubby species do not attain a greater height than four or five feet; these grow in sandy soils, or among rocks exposed to sun and air. Another runs on the ground and bears foliage almost evergreen. The stem of one species attains a diameter of a foot, bearing its foliage in a great canopy. From this giant form the species vary to slender, graceful, climbing vines. Wild grapes are as varied in climatic adaptations as in structure of vine and grow luxuriantly in every condition of heat or cold, wetness or dry- ness, capable of supporting fruit-culture in America. So THE DOMESTICATION OF THE GRAPE 5 many of the kinds have horticultural possibilities that it seems certain that some grape can be domesticated in all of the agri- cultural regions of the country, their natural plasticity indi- cating, even if it were not known from experience, that all can be domesticated. Leif the Lucky, the first European to visit America, if the Icelandic records are true, christened the new land Wineland. It has been supposed that this designation was given for the grapes, but recent investigations show that the fruits were probably mountain cranberries. Captain John Hawkins, who visited the Spanish settlements in Florida in 1565, mentions wild grapes among the resources of the New World. Amadas and Barlowe, sent out by Raleigh in 1584, describe the coasts of the Carolinas as, “so full of grapes that in all the world like abundance cannot be found.” Captain John Smith, writing in 1606, describes the grapes of Virginia and recommends the culture of the vine as an industry for the newly founded colony. Few, indeed, are the explorers of the Atlantic seaboard who do not mention grapes among the plants of the country. Yet none saw intrinsic value in these wild vines. To the Europeans, the grapes of the Old World alone were worth ‘cultivating, and the vines growing everywhere in America only suggested that the grape they had known across the sea might be grown in the new home. That American viticulture must depend on the native species for its varieties began to be recognized at the beginning of the nineteenth century, when several large companies engaged in growing foreign grapes failed, and a meritorious native grape made its appearance. The vine of promise was a variety known as the Alexander. Thomas Jefferson, ever alert for the agricultural welfare of the nation, writing in 1809 to John Adlum, one of the first experimenters with an American species, voiced the sentiment of grape experimenters in speaking of the Alexander: “I think it will be well to push the culture 6 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING of this grape without losing time and efforts in the search of foreign vines, which it will take centuries to adapt to our soil and climate.” Fic. 2. A shoot of Vitis Labrusca. Alexander is an offshoot of the common fox-grape, V2tis Labrusca (Fig. 2), found in the woods on the Atlantic coast from Maine to Georgia and occasionally in the Mississippi Valley. The history of the variety dates back to before the Revolutionary THE DOMESTICATION OF THE GRAPE 7 War, when, according to William Bartram, the Quaker botanist, it was found growing in the vicinity of Philadelphia, by John Alexander, gardener to Governor Penn of Pennsylvania. Curiously enough, it came into general cultivation through the deception of a nurseryman. Peter Legaux, a French- American grape-grower, in 1801 sold the Kentucky Vineyard Society fifteen hundred grape cuttings which he said had been taken from an European grape introduced from the Cape of Good Hope, therefore called the “Cape” grape. Legaux’s grape turned out to be the Alexander. In the new home the spurious Cape grew wonderfully well and as the knowledge of its fruitfulness in Kentucky, Ohio and Indiana spread, demand for it increased, and with remarkable rapidity, considering the time, it came into general cultivation in the parts of the United States then settled. The Labrusca or fox-grapes. Of the several species of American grapes now under culti- vation, the Labrusca, first represented by the Alexander, has furnished more cultivated varieties than all the other American species together, no less than five hundred of its varieties havy- ing been grown in the vineyards of the country. There are several reasons why it is the most generally cultivated species. It is native to the parts of the United States in which agriculture soonest advanced to a state where fruits were desired. In the wild, the Labruscas are the most attractive, being largest and handsomest in color; among all grapes it alone shows black-, white- and red-fruited forms on wild vines. There is a northern and a southern form of the species, and its varieties are, there- fore, widely adapted to climates and to soils. The flavor of the fruits of this species, all things considered, is rather better than that of any other of our wild grapes, though the skins in most of its varieties have a peculiar aroma, somewhat pro- nounced in the well-known Concord, Niagara and Worden, 8 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING which is disagreeable to tastes accustomed to the pure flavors of the European grapes. All Labruscas submit well to vineyard operations and are vigorous, hardy and productive, though they are more subject to the dreaded phylloxera than are most of the other cultivated native species. Of the many grapes of this type, at least two deserve brief historical mention. Catawba, probably a pure-bred Labrusca, the first American grape of commercial importance, is the most interesting variety of its species. The origin of the variety is not certainly known, but all evidence points to its having been found about the year 1800 on the banks of the Catawba River, North- Carolina. It was introduced into general cultivation by Major John - Adlum, soldier of the Revolution, judge, surveyor and author of the first American book on grapes. Adlum maintained an experimental vineyard in the District of Columbia, whence in 1823 he began the distribution of the Catawba. At that time the center of American grape culture was about Cincin- nati, and an early shipment of Adlum’s Catawbas went to Nicholas Longworth of that city and was by him distributed throughout the grape-growing centers of the country. As one of the first to test new varieties of American grapes, to grow them largely and to make wine commercially from them, Nicholas Longworth is known as the “father of American grape culture.” Catawba is still one of the four leading varieties in the vine- yards of eastern America. The characters whereby its high place is maintained among grapes are: Great elasticity of constitution, by reason of which the vine is adapted to many environments; rich flavor, long-keeping quality, and hand- some appearance of fruit, qualities which make it a very good dessert grape; high sugar-content and a rich flavor of juice, so that from its fruit is made a very good wine and a very good grape-juice; and vigor, hardiness and productiveness of vine. The characters of Catawba are readily transmissible, and it THE DOMESTICATION OF THE GRAPE 9 has many pure-bred or hybrid offspring which more or less resemble it. The second commercial grape of importance in American viticulture is Concord, which came from the seed of a wild grape planted in the fall of 1843 by Ephraim W. Bull, Concord, Massachusetts. The new variety was disseminated in the spring of 1854, and from the time of its introduction the spread of its culture was phenomenal. By 1860 it was the leading grape in America and it so remains. Concord furnishes, with the varieties that have sprung from it, seventy-five per cent of the grapes grown in eastern America. The characters which distinguish the vine are: Adaptability to various soils, fruit- fulness, hardiness and resistance to diseases and insects. The fruits are distinguished by certainty of maturity, attractive appearance, good but not high flavor, and by the fact that they may be produced so cheaply that no other grape can com- pete with this variety in the markets. Concord is, as Horace Greeley well denominated it in awarding the Greeley prize for the best American grape, “the grape for the millions.” The histories of these two grapes are typical of those of five hundred or more other Labruscas. Out of a prodigious num- ber of native seedlings, an occasional one is found greatly to excel its fellows and is brought under cultivation. The Rotundifolia or Muscadine grapes. Long before the northern Labruscas had attained prominence in the vineyards of the North, a grape had been domesticated partially in the South. It is Vitis rotundifolia (Fig. 3), a species which runs riot from the Potomac to the Gulf, thriving in many diverse soils, but growing only in the southern climate and preferring the seacoast. Rotundifolia grapes have been culti- vated somewhat for fruit or ornament from the earliest colonial times. It is certain that wine was made from this species by the English settlers at Jamestown. Vines of it are now to be 10 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING found on arbors, in gardens or half wild on fences in nearly every farm in the South Atlantic states. That the Rotundifolias have not been more generally brought under cultivation is due ) aan | I K{') x Ai \ il i" Fic. 3. + . < ‘ ca 4 4 | a2 » rama CHAPTER IV STOCKS AND RESISTANT VINES PHYLLOXERA, a tiny root-louse, made its appearance in France in 1861 and began multiplying with a fury unparalleled in the insect world. By 1874, the pest had become so wide- spread in Europe that it threatened the very existence of the great vineyard industry of that continent. All attempts to bring the pest under control failed, although the French gov- ernment offered a reward of 300,000 francs for a satisfactory remedy. Numerous methods of treating the soil to check the ravages of the insect were tried, also, but none was effica- cious. Finally, it dawned on European vineyardists that phylloxera is not a scourge in America, its habitat, and that European vineyards might be saved by grafting Vinifera vines on the roots of immune American grapes. At once the recon- struction of vineyards in Europe was begun by grafting the grapes on phylloxera-resistant roots. Meanwhile, consterna- tion spread to California when it was discovered that phylloxera was running riot in some of the vineyards of the Pacific slope ; however, with the knowledge derived from viticulturists in Europe, they too began reconstructing vineyards on immune roots, without the same success as the Europeans, it is true, but with such measure of success that it soon became the approved method of growing grapes in this great region. Through the use of resistant stocks, phylloxera is now defied in Vinifera regions. Millions of American stocks are annually struck at home, in Europe and wherever Vinifera grapes are grown, to be top-worked with varieties susceptible to phylloxera. Seldom has mastery over a pest been so complete; but, to 61 62 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING triumph over the tiny insect, the industry has had to be revo- lutionized. Resistant stocks, in their turn, brought innumer- able new problems, many of which are still unsolved. Investi- gations and experiences in rehabilitating vineyards have been carried on for forty years, the results set forth in books and bulletins and yet there are many problems to be solved. The grape-grower in regions infested with phylloxera is always under the necessity of taking advantage of the latest demonstra- tion of practices in the use of resistant stocks. These practices are best studied in the experiments of state experiment stations and the United States Department of Agriculture, and in the vineyards of leading grape-growers, since even those most needing elucidation can be but briefly discussed in the following paragraphs. The wild vines of a species are always seedlings and are hence exceedingly variable. The first vineyards of resistant stocks were vines grafted on stocks of wild vines, and the results were very unsatisfactory; for, naturally, there was divergence in many characters and especially in the vigor of the vines. Also, there was difficulty in grafting, since some wild vines are stout and others slender; some bear grafts well, while others do not. It soon became apparent that to succeed, varieties must be selected from the different species for vine- yard work. The great task of the experimenter and grape- grower, therefore, has been to select varieties of the several species sufficiently resistant, vigorous and otherwise possessed of characters fitting them to become good stocks. Out of vast numbers tested, a few are now generally recognized as best for the several groups of Vinifera grapes and the several distinct regions in which these grapes are grown. Resistant species and varieties. The reconstruction of phylloxera-ridden vineyards by the use of resistant stocks is possible only because some species STOCKS AND RESISTANT VINES 63 and varieties are, as has been said, more resistant to the root- louse than others. All degrees of resistance exist, as would be suspected, from immunity to great susceptibility. It is obvious that the foundation of the art of growing resistant vineyards is exact knowledge of the immunities and suscepti- bilities of the many varieties and species of grapes. From the first use of resistant vines, experimenters everywhere have set themselves at work to determine not only what the most resist- ant vines are, but what the causes and conditions of immunity. In spite of a wealth of empirical discoveries as to what grapes can best resist the root-louse, causes and most of the conditions of immunity are still little understood. Definite, useful knowl- edge, so far, goes little further than the establishment of lists of species and varieties, the latter subject to change, that are most useful in setting resistant vineyards. Phylloxera does little damage to species of Vitis native to the same general region in which the pest has its habitat, but nevertheless there are some differences in resistance in American grapes. Munson, one of the best American authorities on the resistance of species to phylloxera, says:! “ Rotundifolia is entirely immune, then Rupestris, Vulpina, Cinerea, Ber- landieri, Champini, Candicans, Doaniana, stivalis and Lince- cumii are so high in resistance as to be practically uninjured, though they may be attacked, while Labrusca is low in resist- ance and is much weakened in clay soils, if infested, and Vinif- era is entirely non-resistant.”” Some of these species are hard to propagate and difficult to suit in soil and climate so that but two of them are much used for resistant stocks. The two most used are Rupestris and Vulpina (Riparia), of both of which there are varieties which give satisfaction. Bioletti, a leading author- ity on resistant stocks in California, says :? 1 Munson, T. V. Foundations of American Grape Culture, 217. 1909. 2 Bioletti, Frederic T. Calif. Exp. Sta., Bul. 180: 96-97. 1906. 64 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING “Varieties of resistant stocks which will in all probability be used in California are Rupestris St. George (du Lot), Riparia < Rupestris 3306, Riparia x Rupestris 3309, Riparia Solonis 1616, Mourvédre X Rupestris 1202, Aramon X Rupestris 2, Ri- paria gloire, and Riparia grande glabre. These are all varieties which have given excellent varieties for years in Europe, and have all been tested successfully in California. Among them are varieties suitable for nearly all the vineyard soils of Cali- fornia, with perhaps the exception of some of the heavier clays. “The only one of these varieties which has been planted extensively in California is the Rupestris St. George. There can be little doubt, however, that it will fail to give satisfaction in many soils, and though we may not find something better for all our soils it is probable that we will repeat the experience of Southern France and find that in most soils there is some other variety that gives better results. Without attempting to describe these varieties, but to give some idea of their merits and defects and of the soils most suited to each, the following indications are given, based principally on the opinions of L. Ravaz and Prosper Gervais, and on a still limited experience in California : “The Rupestris St. George is remarkably vigorous and grows very large, supporting the graft well even without stakes. It roots easily and makes excellent unions with most vinifera varieties. It is well suited to deep soils where its roots can penetrate. Its defects are that it is very subject to root-rot, especially in moist soils; it suckers badly and it suffers from drought in shallow soils. Its great vigor produces coulure with some varieties and often necessitates long pruning. “Tn moist or wet soils 1616 or 3306 had given better results in France and gives indications of doing equally well here. In drier soils 3309 will probably be found preferable. “Aramon Rupestris No. 2 is suited to the same soils as Rupestris St. George, and does particularly well in extremely STOCKS AND RESISTANT VINES 65 gravelly soils. It has some of the defects of the St. George and is moreover more difficult to graft, and its only advantage in California is that it is rather less susceptible to root-rot. “There are no better resistant stocks than Riparia gloire and Riparia grande glabre, wherever they are put in soils that suit them. They do well, however, only in deep, rich, alluvial soils which are neither too wet nor too dry. Their grafts are the most productive of all, and ripen their grapes from one to two weeks earlier than the grafts on St. George. Their prin- cipal defect is that they are very particular as to the soil, and they never grow quite as large as the cion. The gloire is the most vigorous, and the difference of diameter is less with this variety than with any other Riparia. “The Mourvédre X Rupestris 1202 is extremely vigorous, roots and grafts easily, and is well adapted to rich, sandy and moist soils. In drier and poorer soils its resistance is perhaps not sufficient. “The most promising varieties for general use at present seem to be the two hybrids of Riparia and Rupestris, 3306 and 3309. They have great resistance to the phylloxera, root and graft almost as easily as St. George, and are quite sufficiently vigorous to support any variety of vinifera. The former is more suited to the moister soils and wherever there is danger of root-rot, and the latter to the drier soils. In gen- eral, they are suited to a larger variety of soils and condition than perhaps any other varieties. “Riparia gloire should be planted only on rich, deep alluvial soil containing an abundance of plant food and humus, what would be called good garden land, such as river bank soil not liable to overflow. “Tn most other soils Riparia X Rupestris 3306 is to be recom- mended, except those that are rather dry, where 3309 is to be preferred, or those which are very wet, where Solonis X Riparia 1616 is surer to give good results.” F 66 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING The value of a species or variety for a resistant stock may be judged somewhat by the visible effect of the phylloxera on the roots of the vines. On susceptible species, the punctures of the insects rapidly produce swellings which vary in size and number in accordance with resistance of the species. ‘Techni- cally, the first swelling on the young tender rootlets of the vine is called a nodosity. The presence of a few nodosities on the root system does not indicate that a vine is not a valuable resistant stock. When the nodosity begins to decay and becomes of a cancerous nature, it is called a tuberosity. These tuberosities decay more or less rapidly and deeply, and when they rot deeply cause enfeeblement or death to the vine. Thus, on Vinifera varieties the tuberosities are several times larger and decay sets in much more quickly than on American species which show these tuberosities. Ratings as to resistance of species are usually made from the size and number of the tuberosities, though when these are found producing a scab-like wound which scales off, there may be high resisting power. In order to convey with some degree of definiteness the power of resistance to phylloxera, an arbitrary scale has been agreed on by viticulturists. In this scale, maximum resistance is indicated by 20 and minimum by 0. Thus, the resisting power of a good Vulpina is put as 19.5 and that of a poor Vinifera variety as 0. ADAPTATIONS OF RESISTANT STOCKS TO SOILS AND CLIMATES Resistance, of course, counts for naught in a stock which comes from a species unsuited to the soil and climate or other circumstances of the locality in which the vineyard is to be planted. The several species used for stocks differ widely in the requirements affecting growth so that the grower must make certain that the resistant stock he selects will find con- genial surroundings. Stocks in congenial circumstances are STOCKS AND RESISTANT VINES 67 frequently more resistant than others inherently more resistant, but which are not otherwise adapted to the particular condi- tions. of the vineyard. Species of grapes vary greatly in their root systems, some having thick, others slender roots; the roots of some are soft, of others hard; some have roots going down deeply, others are almost at the surface of the ground. Manifestly these various root-forms are but adaptations to loose and heavy, dry and moist, deep and shallow soils, or to some circumstance of climate. A vine bruised by adversity is in no condition to withstand phylloxera. Therefore, since the adaptability of a variety to a soil or climate may be changed by the stock, the adaptations of stocks to soils and climates must have attention. Affinity of stock and cion. Different varieties of grapes do not behave alike on the same stocks, and different stocks may affect varieties differently. Even when the kinship is close, some grapes resist all the appliances of art to make a successful union; while, on the other hand, quite distinct species often seem foreordained to be joined. For example, Rotundifolia, which has the highest resistance to phylloxera of any species, is useless as a stock because it is impossible to graft any other grape on it, while Vulpina and Rupestris unite readily with varieties of Vinifera, the slight decrease in the vigor of the grafted vines serving oftentimes to increase fruitfulness. - Something more is neces- sary, then, than botanical kinship. Just what is necessary, no one knows, beyond: that there must be conformity in habit between stock and cion; that the two must start in growth at approximately the same time; and that the tissues must be sufficiently alike that there be proper contact in the union. Yet these facts do not sufficiently explain all of the affinities and antipathies which species and varieties of grapes show to each other. Unfortunately, the grape-grower has had but 68 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING little to guide him in selecting stocks and has had to learn by making repeated trials. PrRorPeR PLANTING OF GRAFTED VINES Europeans and Californians long ago learned that failures with grafted vines often came from setting the vines too deep in the soil, the result being that the cions struck root and became independent, whereupon the stock dies or becomes so moribund that the beneficial effects are lost. There are grape- growers who argue that it is beneficial to the vine to have roots from both stock and cion, but experience and experiments very generally teach the contrary, it being found that in most grafts the cion roots grow more vigorously than stock roots and eventually starve out the latter. The disastrous effects of cion-rooting are often to be found, also, when grafting has been done on old vines in the vineyard; and, again, when the graft is too close to the root system. Another cause of failure is that different stocks require that the vineyard soil be treated differently, especially at planting time. Vulpina stocks require that the soil be much more deeply plowed than for Viniferas on their own roots, since Vulpinas are deep-rooted and are exacting in the depth of root-run required. Those who have had most experience with resistant stocks maintain that all American grapes require rather deeper plowing than European grapes on their own roots. INFLUENCE OF THE STOCKS ON THE CION Up to the present, the growing of grafted grapes has been carried on with little thought of the mutual influence of stock and cion; grapes have been grafted only to secure vines resistant to phylloxera. Yet there can be no doubt that stock and cion react on one another, and that any variety of grapes is influenced a a ae STOCKS AND RESISTANT VINES 69 for better or worse in characters of vine and fruit by the stock upon which it is grafted. A plant is a delicate mechanism, easily thrown out of gear, and all plants, the grape not the least, are more or less changed in the adjustments of stock and cion. One could fill a large volume on the supposed reciprocal influence of stock and cion in fruits. Space suffices, here, however, to mention only those proved and those having to do with the influence of the stock on the cion when the grape is grafted. Influence of stocks on European grapes summarized. Common experience in Europe and California indicates that varieties of Vinifera grapes grafted on resistant stocks which are perfectly adapted to soil and climate produce not only larger crops but sweeter or sourer grapes; that the crop ripens earlier or later; that the vine is often more vigorous; and that there are some minor differences depending on the stock used. Winemakers assert that the character of their product may be affected for better or worse by the stock. Often vines are so improved by grafting that the extra expense of the operation and of the stock is paid for; although, to be sure, about as often the effects are deleterious. The successes and failures of vineyards on resistant stocks make plain that the vine-grower must study the many problems which stocks present and exer- cise utmost intelligence in the selection of the proper stock. Influence of stocks on American grapes. No doubt American species of grapes may be as profoundly modified by stocks as the European species, but there is but little evidence on this phase of grape-growing to be drawn from the experience of vineyardists. One rather conclusive experi- ment, however, shows that American grapes may be improved by growing them on stocks which give them better adaptations to their environment. The experiment was tried in the Chau- 70 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING tauqua grape-belt in western New York by the New York Agricultural Experiment Station. The test was carried on for eleven years, during which time many interesting possibilities in grafting grapes in this region came to light. It was proved that the stock materially affects the vigor and productiveness of the vine and the quality of the grapes. The following brief account is taken from Bulletin No. 355 of the New York Station : In this experiment a number of varieties were grafted on St. George, Riparia Gloire and Clevener stocks, and a fourth group on their own roots. The varieties grafted were: Agawam, Barry, Brighton, Brilliant, Campbell Early, Catawba, Con- cord, Delaware, Goff, Herbert, Iona, Jefferson, Lindley, Mills, Niagara, Regal, Vergennes, Winchell and Worden. The planting plan and all of the vineyard operations were those common in commercial vineyards. ; 7 Yearly accounts of the vineyard show that the vines passed through many vicissitudes. The experiment was started in 1902 when St. George and Riparia Gloire stocks from Cali- fornia were set and grafted in the field. Many of these died the first year. The winter of 1903-04 was unusually severe, and many more vines were either killed or so severely injured that they died during the next two years. The vines on St. George, a very deep-rooting grape, withstood the cold best. Fidia, the grape root-worm, was found in the vineyards early in the life of the vines and did much damage in some years. In the years of 1907 and 1909 the crops were ruined by hail. But despite these serious setbacks it was evident throughout the experiment that the grafted grapes made better vines and were more productive than those on their own roots. As an example of the differences in yield, a summary of the data for 1911 may be given. In this year, an average of all the varieties on own roots yielded at the rate of 4.39 tons to the acre; on St. George, 5.36 tons; on Gloire, 5.32 tons; on Clevener, 5.62 STOCKS AND RESISTANT VINES 71 tons. The crops on the grafted vines were increased through the setting of more bunches and the development of larger bunches and berries. The grapes on the vines grafted on Gloire and Clevener ripened a few days earlier than those on their own roots, while with St. George a few varieties were retarded in ripening. Changing the time of maturity may be very important in grape regions where there is danger of early frost to late-ripening sorts, and where it is often desirable to retard the harvest time of early grapes. In the behavior of the vines, the results correspond closely with those given for yields. In the growth ratings of varieties on different stocks, the varieties on their own roots were rated in vigor at 40; on St. George, at 63.2; on Gloire, at 65.2; on Clevener, at 67.9. There is no way of deciding how much the thrift of the vines depends on adaptability to soil, and how much on other factors. Since all of the varieties were more productive and vigorous on grafted vines than on their own roots it may be said that a high degree of congeniality exists between the stocks and varieties under test. The experiment suggests that it would be profitable to grow fancy grapes of American species on grafted vines, and that it is well within the bounds of possibility that main-crop grapes can be grafted profitably. In the general tuning-up of agri- culture now in progress, it may be expected that soon Ameri- can as well as European varieties of grapes will be grown under some conditions and for some purposes on roots other than their own. Direct PRODUCERS Attempts innumerable have been and are still being made to secure, by hybridizing |’. vinifera and American species of grapes, varieties that will resist phylloxera, the mildew and black-rot. The grapes of this continent are relatively immune (074 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING to all of these troubles, and if hybrids could be obtained to produce directly, without grafting, grapes with the good qualities of the Viniferas—in short, European grapes on American vines — the cultivated grape flora of the whole world might be changed. So far, a “direct producer” that is wholly satis- factory in either Europe or California has not been found for the wine or raisin industries, although a number of varieties are rated as very good table grapes, and a few are used in wine- making. The best of the direct producers are Lenoir, Taylor, Noah, Norton’s Virginia, Autuchon, Othello, Catawba, and Delaware. Puate V.— Vinifera grapes grown out of doors in New York. Top, Malvasia; bottom, Chasselas Golden. CHAPTER V THE VINEYARD AND ITS MANAGEMENT A VINEYARD is more artificial than other plantations of fruits, since the vine requires greater discipline under cultivation than tree or bush. Yet greater art is required only when the attempt is made to grow the grape to perfection, for the vine bears fruit if left to indulge in riotous growth wheresoever it can strike root. Vineyard management, therefore, may repre- sent the consummate art of three thousand or more years of cultural subserviency; or it may be so primeval in simplicity as to approach neglect. The grape is so wonderfully responsive to good care, however, that no true lover of fruit will profane it with neglect, but will seek, rather, to give it a favorable situation, its choice of soils and such generous care as will insure strong, vigorous, productive vineyards of choicely good fruit. Grape-growing is a specialists’ business, for the culture of the grape is unlike that of any other fruit. The essentials of vine- yard management, however, are easily learned. Indeed, care of the vine comes almost instinctively; for the grape has been cultivated since prehistoric times and the races of the world are so familiar with it through sacred literatures, myths, fables, stories and poetry, that its care is prompted by natural impulse. The grape has followed civilized man so closely from place to place through the temperate climates of the world, that rules and methods of culture have been developed for almost every condition under which it will grow, so that every grape-grower may profit by the successes and failures of the generations 73 74 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING that preceded him. Grape-growing is not, however, an art wholly governed by rules of the past to be carried on by com- mon laborers who use hands only, but is one in which its fol- lowers may make use of science and may put thought, skill and taste into their work. LAYING OuT THE VINEYARD Vineyards are laid out for the most part after accepted pat- terns for each of the great grape regions of America. The vines are always planted in rectangles, usually at a less distance apart in the rows than the rows are from each other, but some- times in squares. Pride in appearance and convenience in vineyard operations make perfect alignment imperative. Many varieties of grapes, especially of American species, are partially self-sterile, so that some varieties must have others interplanted with them for cross-pollination. This is usually done by set- ting alternate rows of the variety to be pollinated and the cross- pollinator. All self-fertile varieties are set in solid blocks be- cause of convenience in harvesting. Direction of rows. Some grape-growers attach considerable importance to the direction in which rows run, holding either that the full blaze of the sun at mid-day is desirable for vine, soil and fruit, or that it is detrimental. Those who desire to provide fullest exposure to the sun plant rows east and west when the distance between vines is less than the distance between rows; north and south when vines are farther apart in the row than the rows are from each other. When shade seems more desirable, these directions are reversed. Most often, however, the rows are laid out in accordance with the shape of the vineyard; or, if the land is hilly, the rows follow the contour of the declivities to prevent soil erosion by heavy rains. THE VINEYARD AND ITS MANAGEMENT 75 Alleys. For convenience in vineyard operations, especially spraying and harvesting, there should always be alleys through a vine- yard. On hilly lands, the alleys are located to secure ease in hauling; on level lands they are usually arranged to cut the vineyards into blocks twice as long as wide. An alley is usually made by leaving out a row of vines. Many vineyards are laid out with rows far enough apart so that alleys are not needed. Distances between rows and plants. There are great variations in the distances between rows and plants in different regions, and distances vary somewhat in any one region. Distances are influenced by the following considerations: Rich soils and large vigorous varieties require greater distances than poor soils and less vigorous varieties; sometimes, however, it is necessary to crowd a variety in the vineyard so that by reducing its vigor fruitfulness may be pro- moted. Usually the warmer the climate, or the exposure, the greater should be the distance between vines. Very often the topography of the land dictates planting distances. But while taking in account the preceding considerations, which rightly suggest the distances between plants in the row, convenience in vineyard operations is the factor that most often fixes the distance between rows. The rows must be far enough apart in commercial vineyards to permit the use of two horses in plowing, spraying and harvesting. Planted in squares, the distance varies from seven feet in garden culture to nine feet in commercial vineyards for eastern America. More often, however, the rows are eight or nine feet apart, with the vines six, seven or eight and in the South ten or twelve feet apart in the rows. Planting distances are less, as a rule, on the Pacific slope than in eastern regions; that is, the distances between the rows are the same, to permit work 76 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING with teams, but the distance between plants in the rows is less, sometimes being no greater than three and a half or four feet. The rank-growing Rotundifolias of the southern states need much room, nine by sixteen feet being none too much. Sunshine must govern the distance apart somewhat. Grapes picked in the pleached alleys of closely set vineyards of the North and East are few, small and poor; farther south, shade from the vines may be a requisite for a good crop. The number of vines to the acre must be determined before growing or buying plants. This is done by multiplying the distance in feet between the rows by the distance the plants are apart in the row, and dividing 43,560, the number of square feet in an acre, by the product. PREPARATION FOR PLANTING It is impossible to put too much emphasis on the necessity of thorough preparation of the land before planting the grape. Extra expenditure to secure good tilth is amply repaid by increased growth in the grape, and all subsequent care may fail to start the vines in vigorous growth if the land is not in good tilth preparatory to planting. The vineyard is to stand a generation or more, and its soil is virtually immortal, two facts to suggest perfect preparation. The land should be thor- oughly well plowed, harrowed, mixed and smoothed. The better this work is done, the greater the potentialities of the vineyard. Here, indeed, is a time to be mindful of the adage which comes from Cato, a sturdy old Roman grape-grower of 2000 years ago: “The face of the master is good for the land.” Preparation is a series of operations in which it is wise to take advantage of time and begin a year before the vines are to be set. The land must be put in training to fit it for the long service it is to render. The two great essentials of preparation are provision for drainage and thorough cultivation. Both, THE VINEYARD AND ITS MANAGEMENT 77 to be performed as the well-being of the grape require, take time, and a year is none too short a period in which to do the work. Moreover, newly drained and deeply plowed land requires time for frost, air, sunshine and rain to sweeten and enliven the soil after the mixture by these operations of live topsoil with inert subsoil. Drainage. The ideal soil, as we are often told, resembles a sponge, and is capable of retaining the greatest possible amount of plant- food dissolved in water, and at the same time is permeable for air. This ideal, sponge-like condition is particularly desirable for the grape, especially native species, because the vines of all are exceedingly deep-rooted. Moreover, grapes thrive best in a warm soil. While, therefore, the roots may make good use of nutritious solutions, if not too diluted, in an un- drained soil, they suffocate and do not receive sufficient bottom heat. It must be made emphatic that the grape will not thrive in water-logged land. Unless the land is naturally well drained, under-drainage must be provided as the first step in the preparation of land for the vineyard. ‘Tile-draining is usually best done by those who make land-draining their business, but information as to every requirement of land and detail of work may be secured from many texts, so that grape-growers may perform the work for themselves. In concluding the topic, the reader must be reminded that high and hill lands are not necessarily well drained, and low lands are not necessarily wet even if the sur- face is level. Often hilltops and hillsides need artificial drain- ing; much less often valley lands and level lands may not need it. To assume, too, that gravelly and shaley soils are always well drained often leads directly contrary to the truth. Sandy and gravelly soils need drainage nearly as often as loamy and clayey ones. 18 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING Following tiling, if the land has had to be under-drained, the vineyard should be graded to fill depressions and to make the surface uniform. Usually this can be done with cutaway, tooth or some other. harrow, but sometimes the grader or road-scraper must be put in use. Fitting the land. Preparatory cultivation should begin the spring preceding planting by deep plowing. If the land has been used long for general farming so that a hard plow-sole has been formed by years of shallow plowing, a subsoil-plow should follow in the furrow of the surface plow, although it is seldom advisable to go deeply into the true hardpan. Fitting the land must not stop here but should continue through the summer with harrow and cultivator to pulverize the soil almost to its ultimate particles. Such cultivation can be sufficiently thorough, and be made at the same time profitable, by growing some hoed crop which requires intensive culture. If the soil lacks humus, a cover-crop of clover or other legume might well be sown in early summer to be plowed under in late fall. Or, if stable manure is available, this generally should be applied the fall before planting. Stable manure applied at this time to a soil inclined to be niggardly puts an atmosphere in the forth- coming vineyard wholly denied the grower who must rely on commercial fertilizers. The land should be plowed again, deeply and as early in the fall as possible, harrowed thoroughly, or possibly cross- plowed and then harrowed. The land must go into the winter ready for early spring planting and the fall work must be done promptly and with a sturdy team and sharp, bright tools. The grower must keep in mind that no opportunity will offer during the life of the vineyard to even up for slackness in the start and that a vineyard of dingy, unhappy vines may be the result of neglect at this critical time. Good tilth should proceed until THE VINEYARD AND ITS MANAGEMENT 79 the earth is fairly animated with growth when the vines are planted. Plate I] shows a piece of land well fitted for planting. Marking for planting. Given level land, a well-made marker, a gentle team and a careful driver with a surveyor’s eye, and a vineyard may be marked for planting with a sled-marker, a modified corn-marker or even a plow. Some such marker method is commonest in use in laying out vineyard rows, but it is patent to the eye of every passer-by in grape regions that the commonest method is not the best to secure perfect alignment of row and vine. The combination named for good work with any of the marker methods is found too seldom. If the marker method is used, it is put in practice as follows: The rows being marked at the distance decided on, a deep furrow is plowed along the row by going both ways with the plow; this done, small stakes are set in the furrow at the proper distances for the vines, taking care to line them both ways. Planting holes are thus dug in the furrow with the stakes as a center. Marking by means of a measuring wire or chain is the best method of locating vines accurately in a vineyard. The meas- uring wire varies according to the wishes of the user from two to three hundred feet or may be even longer. The best wires are made of annealed steel wire about an eighth of an inch in diameter. At each end of the wire is a strong iron ring to be slipped over stakes. The wire is marked throughout its length by patches of solder at the distances desired between rows of vines; to make these places more easily seen, pieces of red cloth are fastened to them. Sometimes this measuring wire is made of several strands of small wire, giving more flexibility and making marking easier, since by separating the strands at the desired points, pieces of cloth may be tied to mark distances. In using the wire, the side of the vineyard which is to serve as the base of the square is selected and the wire is stretched, 80 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING leaving at least one rod from road or fence for a headland. With the wire thus stretched, a stake is placed at each of the distance tags to represent the first row of vines. Beginning at the starting point, sixty feet are measured off in the base line and a temporary stake is set; eighty feet at a right angle | with the first line are then measured off at the corner stake, judging the angle with the eye; then run diagonally from the eighty-foot stake to the sixty-foot stake. If the distance between the two stakes is one hundred feet, the corner is a right angle. With the base lines thus started at right angles to each other, one can measure off with the measuring wire as large an area as he desires by taking care to have the line each time drawn parallel with the last, and the stakes accurately placed at the marking points on the wire. Still another method which may be put to good use in laying out a vineyard, especially if the vineyard is small, is to combine measure and sight. The distances about the vineyard are measured and stakes set to mark the ends of the rows around the area. Good stakes can be made from laths pointed at one end and whitewashed at the other. A line of stakes is then set across the field each way through the center, in places, of course, which the two central rows of vines will fill. When these are in place, if the area is not too large or too hilly, all measurements can be dispensed with and the vines can be set by sighting. A man at the end of the row has three laths to sight by in each row and a second man should drive stakes as directed by the sighter. Accurate work can be done by this method, but it requires time, a good eye and much patience in the man who is sighting. SELECTING AND PREPARING THE VINES Young grape vines covet life, for they are usually vigorous and not easily injured. Hence, the plants may be brought THE VINEYARD AND ITS MANAGEMENT 81 from a distance without fear of loss. The local nurseryman is, however, a good adviser as to varieties if he is honest and intelligent, and, other things equal, he should be patronized. But if the grower’s needs cannot be met at home, he should not hesitate to seek a nurseryman at a distance. This is more necessary with the grape than other fruits because young grapes are well and cheaply grown in certain localities only. With the grape, as with all fruit plants, it is much better to buy from the grower than from tree peddlers. Selecting vines. Unless the buyer knows what he wants, selecting vines is gambling pure and simple. Fortunately, there are several marks of good vines very helpful to those who know them. One should first make sure that the roots and tops are alive to the remotest parts. The vines should have a good clean, healthy look with trunk diameter large enough to indicate vigorous growth, and an ample spread of roots. Large size is not as desirable as firm, well-matured wood and an abun- dance of roots. Vines with internodes of medium length for the variety are better than those with great length or very short internodes. Such precautions as are possible should be taken to insure varieties true to name, although here the reputation of the nurseryman must be depended on except for the few varieties which may be known at sight in the nursery. First-grade one-year-old vines are usually better than two- year-olds. Stunted vines are not worth planting and two-year- old vines are often stunted one-year-olds. A few weak-grow- ing varieties gain in vigor if allowed to remain in the nursery two years — three years, never. Handling and preparing the vines. The better vines are packed, transported and cared for in the field, the quicker will the roots take hold and the vines G 82 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING make the vigorous start on which so much depends. The nurseryman should be requested not to prune much before packing and to pack the vines well for shipping. The vines should be heeled-in as soon as they reach their destination. If the vines are dry on arrival, they should be drenched well before heeling-in. It sometimes happens that the vines are shriveled and shrunken from excessive drying, in which case the plants often may be brought back to plumpness by burying them root and branch in damp earth, to remain a week or possibly two. To heel-in, a trench should be double furrowed in light, moist soil, the vines spread out in the trench two or three deep, and then earth shoveled over the roots and half the tops, sifting it in the roots, after which the soil is firmed. The vines may thus be kept in good condition for several weeks if need arises. The vines are prepared for planting by cutting away all dead or injured roots and shortening-in the healthy roots. Grape roots can be cut severely if healthy stubs remain, the removal of small roots and fibers doing no harm, since fibers are of value only as indicating that the vine is strong and vigorous. Fresh fibers come quickly from stout, healthy roots. Most of the fibers of a transplanted vine die, and laying them out in the hole to preserve them, as is so often recommended, is but a useless burial rite. On good healthy vines, the stubs of the roots, when cut back, will be four to eight inches in length. The root system having been con- siderably pruned, the reciprocity between roots and tops must be taken into account and the top pruned accordingly. To reduce the work of the leaves to harmonize with the actiy- ities of the roots, the top should be pruned to a single cane and two, never more than three, buds. The vine is now ready for planting and, the soil being in readiness, planting should proceed apace. Piate VI. — Black Hamburg (x3). THE VINEYARD AND ITS MANAGEMENT 83 PLANTING The dangers and difficulties of planting hardwooded plants are greatly exaggerated. The tyro, in particular, is impressed with his responsibilities at this time, and often sends a hurry-up call to experiment station or nurseryman to “send him a man to plant.” If the land is properly prepared and the plants in good condition, the operation of planting is easily, quickly and safely accomplished. There is no need, in planting the vine, of such puttering overniceties as laying out the roots to preserve the fibers, watering each vine as it is set, inserting the vine in a gingerly fashion to make sure that it stands in its new abode as it stood in the old, or puddling the roots in pail or tub of water. On the other hand, the slap-dash method of a Stringfellow who cuts off all small roots and uses a crow- bar in place of a spade is not doing duty by the plant, and bury- ing the roots deep in the earth or covering them close to the surface is courting failure. Digging the holes. This is a simple task in land in good tilth. The holes need only be large and deep enough to hold the roots without undue cramping. Herein is again manifested the wisdom of thoroughly preparing the land; for, in well-prepared land, the hole is really as large as the vineyard. Even in the condition of poor tilth, deep holes are often a menace to the life of the plant, especially if drainage is not provided, for the deep hole becomes a tub into which water pours and stands to soak the roots of dying vines. An extra spurt in digging holes cannot take the place of perfect fitting of the land. There is nothing to commend the practice of digging holes in a leisure time that all may be ready when the time to plant arrives. The vines will strike root best in the freshly turned, moist soil of newly dug earth, which can be firmly set about 84 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING the roots when the vine is planted. Neither is time saved in digging beforehand, for the sun-baked and rain-washed sides of holes long dug would surely have to be pared afresh. It is, however, quite worth while to throw the surface soil to one side and that lower to the other, that a spadeful of moist, virile, surface soil may be put next to the roots. There are, no doubt, some soils in which the holes might be blasted out with dynamite, as, for instance, in a shallow soil with the hardpan near the surface and good subsoil beneath. It is very questionable, however, whether these defective soils -should be used for commercial plantings as long as there still remain unplanted many acres in all grape regions of good deep land for the grape. To such as are attracted by “dynamite farming,’ minute descriptions of methods of use of dynamite and even demonstrations may be secured from manufacturers of the explosive. Time to plant. The best time to plant the vine in cold climates is early spring, when sun and showers arouse the spirit of growth in plants, and nutritive solutions proceed quickly and unerringly to their preappointed places. At this time, the much mutilated vine can undertake best the double task of making fresh roots and opening the dormant leaves. Fall planting puts forward the work, thus diminishing the rush of early spring when vineyard operations crowd, and, no doubt, when all is favorable, enables the vines to start a little more quickly. However, there are frequently serious losses from planting in the fall. In cold winters the grip of frost is sufficient to wrench the young vine from its place and sometimes all but heaves it out of the soil. There is, also, great liability of winter-killing in vines trans- planted in the autumn, not because of greater tenderness of the plant, but because of greater porosity of the loosened soil which enables the cold to strike to a greater depth. These THE VINEYARD AND ITS MANAGEMENT 85 two objections to fall planting can be overcome largely by mounding up the earth so as practically to cover the vines, leveling the mound in early spring; but this extra work more than offsets the labor saving in fall planting. In climates in which the soil does not freeze in the winter, the vines may be set in the autumn if all is favorable. Often, however, conditions are not favorable to fall planting in warm climates, since autumn rains frequently soak the soil so that it cannot be placed properly about the roots; and, moreover, in a cold, water-logged soil the inactive roots begin to decay ; or the soil may be too dry for fall planting. Under such condi- tions, it is often better to delay planting in warm climates until spring when better soil conditions can be secured. Fall or spring, the soil should be reasonably dry, warm and mellow when the work is done. The best time to plant must necessarily vary from year to year, and the vineyardist must decide exactly when to undertake planting in accordance with the conditions of soil and weather, mindful that the Psalmist’s injunction that there is “a time to plant, and a time to pluck up that which is planted” is subject to several conditions requiring judgment. The grape puts out its leaves late in the spring, making the temptation great to delay planting; late-set plants, however, need special care lest they suffer from the summer droughts which annually parch the lands of this continent. The operation of planting. All being in readiness, planting proceeds rapidly. A gang of four men work to advantage. Two dig holes, a third holds the vines and tramps the earth as the remaining man shovels in earth. Except in large vineyards, four men are seldom available, and gangs of two or three must divide the work among its members as best suits conditions. A _ tree-setting board is not needed in planting grapes, although some growers use it. The man who holds the vines in the hole and tramps 86 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING as the shoveler fills, must align the plant after the stake is removed and see that it stands perpendicularly in the hole. The stake, a lath, is set in its old place in the hole to serve as a support for the growing vine and to mark it so that the culti- vator does not pull up the young plant. The soil must be set firm about the roots of the plant, but zeal in tramping should diminish as the hole is filled, leaving the topsoil untramped, smooth, loose and pulverized, a dust mulch — the best of all mulches — to prevent evaporation. The depth to which vines should be set is a matter of con- troversy. This should be governed by the soil more than by any other factor, although some varieties need a deeper root- run than others. The rule to plant to the depth the vine stood in the nursery row is safe under most conditions, although in light, hungry or thirsty soils the roots should go deeper; and, on the other hand, in heavy soils, not so deep. Deep plant- ing is a more common mistake than shallow planting, for roots under most conditions stand exposure better than internment, going down being more natural than coming up for a root seek- ing a place to its liking. Watering at planting is necessary only when the land is parched with drought or in regions in which irrigation is prac- ticed. When necessary, water should be used liberally, at least a gallon or two toa vine. After the earth has been firmed about the roots and the hole is nearly filled, the water should be poured in and the hole filled without more firming. Under dry weather conditions, some prefer to puddle the roots; that is, to dip them in thin mud and plant with the mud adhering. In making the puddle, loose loam and not sticky clay is used, as clay may bake so hard as to injure the roots. With puddling, as with watering, the surface soil should be left loose and soft without traces of the puddling below. Manure or fertilizer about the roots or even in the hole are not necessary or even desirable. If the soil is to be enriched EE es THE VINEYARD AND ITS MANAGEMENT 87 at all at planting time, the fertilizer should be spread on the surface to be cultivated in or to have its food elements leak down as rains fall. In land in which the providential design for grapes is plainly manifested, the vine at no time responds heartily to fertilizers, the good of stable manure probably coming for the most part from its effects on the texture and water-holding capacity of the soil. The newly set plant is not in need of outside nourishment; to put rank manure or strong commercial fertilizers about the roots of a young newly set vine is plant infanticide. CARE OF YOUNG VINES Virgil calls the period in the life of the vine between the setting and the first vintage, the “tender nonage,’’ and tells us that at this time the vines need careful rearing; so they do, now as then, American grapes as well as the grapes of ancient Rome. Fortunately, any departure from normal well-being is easily told in the grape, for the color of the leaf is as accurate an index to the health and vigor of the vine as the color of the tongue or the beat of the pulse in man. A change of color from the luxuriant green of thrifty grape foliage, especially the yellow hue indicating that the leaf-green is not functioning properly, suggests that the vines are sick or need nursing in some detail of care. When all goes well, however, the amazing energy of Nature is nowhere better seen among plants than in the growth of the grape, so that much of the care is in the use of the knife; in fact, as we shall see, the grape almost lives by the knife the first two years out. The first year. The vines having been pruned and staked at planting, these operations need no attention in the first summer. Many varieties send up several shoots as growth starts, and, except 88 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING in the case of grafted plants and in the event of the suckers coming from the stock, these should be left to feed the vine and help to establish a good root system. Vines making a strong growth should be tied to the stake, at least the strongest shoot, to keep the wind from whipping it about and to keep the plants out of the way of the cultivator. The only knack in tying is to keep the vine on the windward side of the stake, thus saving the breaking of tying material. The first year’s pruning, though severe, is easily done. All but the strongest cane are cut out and this is pruned back to two buds, nearly to the ground, so that the vines are much as when set in the vineyard. This pruning, and that of the next two years, has as the object the establishment of a good root system and the production of a sturdy trunk at the height at which the vine is to be headed. It is important that the cane from which the trunk is to come be healthy and the wood well ripened. Pruning may be done at any time after the leaves fall, though most growers give preference to late winter. In cold climates it is a good practice to plow up to the young vines for winter protection, in which case the pruning should be done before plowing. Every detail of vineyard management should be performed with care and at the accepted time in this critical first year. Cultivation must be intensive, insects and fungi must be warded off, mechanical injuries avoided, -vines that have refused to grow must be marked for discard, and the vineyard be put down to a cover-crop in early August if it was not earlier planted to some hoed catch-crop. The second year. Work begins in the spring of the second year with the setting of trellis posts on which one wire is put up. The vine is not yet ready to train but the slender lath of the first season is not sufficient support, and the one wire on the future trellis THE VINEYARD AND ITS MANAGEMENT 89 saves the expense of staking. Tying requires some care and is usually done with string or bast. As the summer proceeds, suckers from the roots are removed and some growers thin the shoots on the young vine; some think it necessary also to top the growth if it becomes too luxuriant and so keep the cane within bounds. Suckers must be cut or broken off at the points where they originate, otherwise several new ones may start from the base of the old. If the vines are topped, it must be kept in mind that summer pruning is weakening, and the tips of shoots should, therefore, be taken when small, the object being to direct the growth into those parts of the vine which are to become permanent. Pruning, the second winter the vine is out, depends on the vigor of the plant. If a strong, healthy, well-matured cane over-tops the lower wire of the trellis, it should be cut back so that the cane may be tied to the wire; otherwise the vine should again be cut almost to the ground, leaving but three or four buds. Ifthe cane be left, in addition to sturdiness and maturity, it should be straight, for it is to become the trunk of the mature vine. The training of the young vine is now at an end, for the next season the vine must be started toward its permanent form, instructions for which are given in the chapter on pruning. The summer care of the vineyard does not differ materially in the second year from that of the first. Intensive cultivation continues, the vines are treated for pests and the annual cover- crop follows cultivation. Many varieties, if vigorous, will set some fruit in this second summer, but the crop should not be allowed to mature, the sooner removed the better, as fruit- ing at this stage of growth seriously weakens the young vines. CATCH-CROPS AND COVER-CROPS A catch-crop is one grown between the rows of another crop for profit from the produce. A cover-crop is a temporary 90 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING crop grown, as the term was first used, to protect the soil, but the word is now used to include green-manuring crops as well. Catch-crops seldom have a place in most vineyards, but cover- crops are often grown. Catch-crops. Catch-crops are not, as a rule, profitable in commercial vineyards; they may bring temporary profit but in the long run they are usually detrimental to the vines. It may pay and the grape may not be injured in some localities, if such truck crops as potatoes, beans, tomatoes and cabbage are grown between the rows or even in the rows for the first year and possibly the second. Land, to do duty by the two crops, however, must be excellent and the care of both crops must be of the best. Growing gooseberries, currants, any of the brambles, or even strawberries, is a poor procedure unless the vineyard is small, the land very valuable or other conditions prevail which make intensive culture possible or necessary. The objections to catch-crops in the vineyard are two: they rob the vines of food and moisture and endanger them to injury from tools in caring for the catch-crop. Sometimes the grape itself is planted as a catch-crop in the vineyard. That is, twice the number of vines required in a row for the permanent vineyard are set with the expectation of cutting out alternate vines when two or three crops have been harvested and the vines begin to crowd. This practice is preferable to interplanting with bush-fruits, yet there is not much to commend it if the experience of those who have tried it is taken as a guide. Too often the filler vines are left a year too long with the result that the permanent vines are checked in growth for several years following. The profits from the fillers are never large, scarcely pay for the extra work, and if the permanent vines are stunted, the filler must be put down as a liability rather than as an asset. THE VINEYARD AND ITS MANAGEMENT 91 Cover-crops. In an experiment being conducted by the New York Agri- cultural Experiment Station, grapes do not give a very appre- ciable response to cover-crops in yield of fruit or growth of vine! There seem to be no other experiments to confirm the results at the New York Station, and grape-growers nowhere have used cover-crops very generally for the betterment of their vineyards. There is doubt, therefore, as to whether grapes will respond profitably to the annual use of cover-crops in yield of fruit, which, of course, is the ultimate test of the value of cover-crops, but a test hard to apply unless the experiment runs a great number of years. Leaving out the doubtful value of cover-crops in increasing the supply of plant-food and thereby producing an increase in yield, there are at least three ways in which cover-crops are valuable in the vineyard. Thus, it is patent to all who have tried cover-crops in the vineyard that the land is in much better tilth and more easily worked when some green crop is turned under in fall or spring; it is not unreasonable to assume, though it is impossible to secure reliable experimental data to confirm the belief, that cover-crops protect the roots of grapes from winter-killing; certainly it may be expected that a cover- crop sowed in midsummer will cause grapes to mature their wood earlier and more thoroughly so that the vines go into the winter in better condition. The only objection to be raised against cover-crops in the vineyard is that pickers, mostly women, object to the cover-crop when wet with rain or dew and usually choose to pick in vineyards having no such crop. This seem- ingly insignificant factor often gives the grape-grower who sows cover-crops much trouble in harvest time. Several cover-crops may be planted in vineyards as clover, 1 For an account of this experiment, see Bul. 381 of the N. Y. Agr. Exp. Sta., Geneva. 92 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING vetch, oats, barley, cow-horn turnip, rape, rye and buckwheat. Combinations of these usually make the seed too costly or the trouble of sowing too great. Yet some combinations of a leguminous and non-leguminous crop would seem to make the best green crop for the grape. Thus, a bushel of oats or barley plus ten pounds of clover or twenty pounds of winter vetch, a combination often used in orchards, should prove satisfactory in the vineyard. Or, doubling the amount of seed for each, these crops could be alternated, with a change in the rotation every four or six years, with cow-horn turnip or rape. Turnip and rape require at least three pounds of seed to the acre. The cover-crop is sown in midsummer, about the first of August in northern latitudes, and should be plowed under in the fall or early spring. Under no circumstances should the green crop be permitted to stand in the vineyard late in the spring to rob the vines of food and moisture. The weather map must be watched at sowing time to make sure of a moist seed-bed. Plate III illustrates two vineyards with well-grown cover-crops. TILLAGE Grape-growers are not in the fog that befuddles growers of tree-fruits in regard to tillage. He is a sloven, indeed, who permits his vines to stand a season in unbroken ground, and there are no growers who recommend sod or any of the modified sod-mulches for the grape. Tillage is difficult in hilly regions and the operation is often neglected in hillside vineyards, as in the Central Lakes region of New York, but even here some sort of tillage is universal. The skip of a single season in till- ing stunts the vines, and two or three skips in successive seasons ruin a vineyard. No one complains that grapes suffer from over-tilling as one frequently hears of tree-fruits. There is no tonic for the grape that compares with cultivation when the THE VINEYARD AND ITS MANAGEMENT 93 leaves lack color and hang limp and the vine has an indefinable air of depression; and there is nothing better than cultivation to rouse latent vigor in a scorching summer, or when drought lays heavy on the land. Tillage tools. The tools to be used in tilling grapes vary with the topography of the vineyard, the kind of soil and the preferences of the vineyardist. The best tool is the one with which the ground can be well fitted at least expense. Good work in the vineyard requires at least two plows, a single-horse and a two-horse plow. The latter, except on very hilly land, should be a gang- plow. For commercial vineyards of any considerable size, several cultivators are necessary for different seasons and conditions of the soil. Thus, every vineyard should have a _spring-tooth and a dise harrow, one of the several types of weeders, a one-horse and a sulky cultivator. If weeds abound, it is necessary to have some cutting tool, or an attachment to one of the cultivators, to slide over the ground and cut off large weeds. Another indispensable tool in a large vineyard is a one-horse grape-hoe, to supplement the work of which there must be heavy hand-hoes. Very often the surface soil must be pulverized, and a clod-crusher, roller or a float becomes a necessity. A full complement of bright, sharp tools at the command of the grape-grower goes far toward success in his business. Tillage methods. There are several reliable guides indicating when the vine- yard needs to be tilled. The vineyardist who is but a casual observer of the relation of vineyard operations to the life events and the welfare of his vines will take the crop of weeds as his guide. It is, of course, necessary to keep down the weeds, but the man who waits until weeds force him to till will make a 94 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING poor showing in his vineyard. The amount of moisture in the soil is a better guide. The chief function of tillage is to save moisture by checking evaporation and to put the soil in such condition that its water-holding capacity is creased. The physical condition of the land is another guide. ‘Tilling when the soil needs pulverizing furnishes a greater feeding surface for the roots. ‘ Tillage begins with plowing in early spring. Whether pro- vided with a cover-crop to be turned under or hard and bare, the land must be broken each spring with the plow. Plowing is best done by running a single furrow with a one-horse plow up to or away from the vines as occasion calls and then follow- ing with a two-horse or a gang-plow. Some growers use a dise harrow instead of the plow to break the land in the spring, but this is a doubtful procedure in most vineyards and is im- possible when a heavy green-crop covers the land. Tillage with harrow, cultivator, weeder or roller then proceeds at such intervals as conditions demand, seldom less than once a fort- night, until time to sow the cover-crop in midsummer. About the time grapes blossom, the grape-hoe should be used to level down the furrow turned up to the vines in the spring plowing. Tillage should always follow a heavy rain to prevent the forma- tion of a soil crust, this being a time when he who tills quickly {ills twice. The number of times a vineyard should be tilled depends on the soil and the season. Ten times over with the cultivator in one vineyard or season may not be as effective as five times in another vineyard or another season. In some regions, as in New York, the grower is so often at the mercy of wet weather in early spring that the plowing is best done in the fall, and spring operations must then open with harrowing with some tool that will break the land thoroughly. The depth to till is governed by the nature of the soil and the season. Heavy soils need deep tilling; light soils, shallow tilling; in wet weather, till deeply; in dry weather, lightly. THE VINEYARD AND ITS MANAGEMENT 95 Grape roots are well down in the soil and there is little danger of injuring them in deep tillage. The depth of plowing and cultivating should be varied somewhat from season to season to avoid the formation of a plow-sole. In some regions plow- ing and cultivating may be made a means of combating insects and fungi, and this regulates the depth of tillage. Thus, in the Chautauqua grape-belt of western New York, the pupa of the root-worm, a scourge of the grape in this region, is thrown out and destroyed by the grape-hoe just as it is about ready to emerge as an adult to lay its eggs on the vines. In all regions, leaves and mummied grapes bearing countless myriads of spores of the mildews, black-rot and other fungi are interned by the plow and cannot scatter disease. The time in the season to stop tillage depends on the locality, the season and the variety. It is a good rule to cease cultiva- tion a few weeks before the grapes attain full size and begin to color, for by this time they will have weighted down the vines so that fruit and foliage will be in the way of the cultivator. In the North, cultivation ceases in the ordinary season about the first of August, earlier the farther south. Rank-growing sorts, as Concord or Clinton, do not need to be cultivated as late as those of smaller growth and scantier foliage, as Delaware or Diamond. The cover-crop seed is covered the last time over with the cultivator. Plate IV shows a well-tilled vineyard of Concords. IRRIGATION The grape, as a rule, withstands drought very well, several species growing wild on the desert’s edge. Even in the semi- arid regions of the far West, where other fruits must always be irrigated, the grape often grows well without artificial water- ing. Irrigation is practiced in vineyards in the United States only on the Pacific slope and here the practice is not as general as with other fruit crops. Whether the grape shall be grown 96 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING under irrigation or not is a local and often an individual ques- tion answered with regard to several conditions; as the local rainfall, the depth and character of the soil, the cost of water and ease of irrigation. These conditions are all correlated and make about the most complex and difficult problem the growers of grapes in semi-arid regions have to solve. As long, however, . * as the grape-grower can grow fairly vigorous vines and harvest a fairly bountiful crop by natural rainfall, he should not irri- gate; for, even though the crop offsets the cost, there are several objections to growing grapes under irrigation. The vines are subject to more diseases and physiological troubles; the fruit is said to lack aroma and flavor; grapes grown on irrigated land do not stand shipment well, the unduly inflated grapes often bursting; wine-makers do not like irrigated grapes as well as those from non-irrigated lands; and watery grapes from irrigated lands make inferior raisins. It is maintained, however, with a show of reason, that grapes suffer in irrigated vineyards in the ways set forth only when the vines are over- or improperly irrigated. (ZX) oeavyad (2x) ALIeG — ‘IIA DLVIg CHAPTER VI FERTILIZERS FOR GRAPES As regards fertilizers, the grape-grower has much to learn and in learning he must approach the problem with humility of mind. For in his experimenting, which is the best way to learn, he will no sooner arrive at what seems to be a certain conclusion, than another season’s results or the yields in an adjoining vineyard will upset the findings of past seasons and those obtained in other*places. Unfortunately, there is little real knowledge to be obtained on the subject, for grape-growers have not yet broken away from time-worn dictums in regard to fertilizers and still follow recommendations drawn from work with truck and field crops. This is excused by the fact that there have been almost no comprehensive experiments in the country with fertilizers for grapes. No fallacies die harder than the pronouncements of chemists a generation ago that fertilizing consists in putting in the soil approximately that which the plants take out; and that the chemical composition of the crop affords the necessary guide to fertilizing. These two theories are the basis of nearly every recommendation that can be found for the use of fertilizers in growing crops. The facts applied to the grape, however, are that the average tillable soil contains a hundred or a thousand times more of the chemical constituents of plants than the grape can possibly take from the soil; and many experiments in supplying food to plants show that the chemical composi- tion of the plant is not a safe guide to their fertilizer require- H 97 98 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING ments. Later teachings in regard to the use of fertilizers are: That the quantity of mineral food in a soil may be of far less importance than the quantity of water, and that the cultivator should make certain that there is sufficient moisture in his land so that the mineral salts may be readily dissolved and so become available as plant-food; that far too much im- portance has been attached to putting chemicals in the soil and too little to the physical condition of the soil, whereby the work of bacteria and the solvent action of organic acids may make available plant-food that without these agencies is unavailable. These brief and simple statements introduce to grape-growers some of the problems with which they must deal in fertilizing grapes, and show what a complex problem of chemistry, physics and biology fertilizing the soil is; how difficult experimental work in this field is; and how cautious workers must be in inter- preting results of either experiment or experience. An account of an experiment in fertilizing a vineyard may make even more plain the difficulties in carrying on experiments in fertilizing fruits and the caution that must be observed in drawing con- clusions. An EXPERIMENT IN FERTILIZING GRAPES The New York Agricultural Experiment Station is experi- menting with fertilizers for grapes at Fredonia, Chautauqua County, the chief grape region in eastern America. The ex- periment should be of interest to every grape-grower from several points of view. It not only shows that there are many and difficult problems in fertilizing grapes, but also the results of the use of manure, commercial fertilizers and cover-crops in a particular vineyard; it suggests the fertilizers to be used and the methods of use; and it furnishes a plan for an experiment by grape-growers who want to try such an experiment and FERTILIZERS FOR GRAPES 99 draw their own conclusions. An account of the experiment and the results for the first five years follows: ! Tests at Fredonia. “In the vineyard at Fredonia eleven plats were laid out in a section of the vineyard where inequalities of soil and other con- ditions were slight or were. neutralized. Each plat included three rows (about one-sixth of an acre) and was separated from the adjoining plats by a ‘buffer’ row not under test. One plat in the center of the section served as a check, and five different fertilizer combinations were used on duplicate plats at either side of the check. Plats 1 and 7 received lime and a complete fertilizer with quick-acting and slow-acting nitrogen ; Plats 2 and 8 received the complete fertilizer but no lime; on Plats 3 and 9 potash was omitted from the complete fertilizer combination; Plats 4 and 10 received no phosphorus; Plats 5 and 11, no nitrogen; and Plat 6 was the check. The materials were applied at such rates that they provided for the first year 72 pounds of nitrogen per acre, 25 pounds of phosphorus and 59 pounds of potassium; and for each of the last four years two-thirds as much nitrogen and phosphorus and eight-ninths as much potassium. The lime was applied the first and fourth years in quantity to make a ton to the acre annually. Cover- crops were sown on all plats alike and were plowed under in late April or early May of each year. These differed in suc- cessive years, but included no legumes. The crops used were rye, wheat, barley and cowhorn turnips separately and the last two in combination. “The cultivation differed only in thoroughness from that generally used in the Belt, the aim being to maintain a good dust mulch during the whole growing season. Pruning by the Chautauqua System was done throughout by one man, who pruned solely according to the vigor of the individual 1 Quoted from Bul. No. 381, N. Y. Agr. Exp. Sta. 100 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING vines and left four, two or three, or no fruiting canes as appeared best. The vineyard was thoroughly sprayed, all plats alike. “Low winter temperatures, affecting immature wood and buds caused by unfavorable weather of the previous season, reduced yields materially during two of the five years, and practically neutralized ‘any anticipated benefit from fertilizers. Following the first of these low-crop years, came a season, 1911, in which favorable conditions, acting upon vines left undiminished in vigor by the light crop of the previous year resulted in heavy and quite uniform yields on all the plats. “The yields for the five years are shown in Table 1; and a summary showing the average gains from each treatment is given in Table II, with the average financial balance after de- ducting the cost of fertilizer application from the increased returns from the plats receiving them. TaBLE ].— YIELD or Grapes (Tons PER ACRE) IN FERTILIZER EXPERIMENTS rt 1909 | 1910 | 1911 | 1912 | 1913 |,>Year, Tons Tons Tons Tons Tons Tons 1 | Complete fertilizer ; lime | 4.48 | 2.10 | 5.37 | 3.46 | 2.14 | 3.51 2 | Complete fertilizer . .| 4.76 | 2.21 | 5.71 | 4.30 | 2.83 | 3.96 3 | Nitrogen and phosphorus] 5.17 | 2.14 | 5.61 | 4.00 | 2.25 | 3.83 4 | Nitrogen and potash .| 4.25 | 2.55 | 5.64 | 4.10 | 2.85 | 3.87 5 | Phosphorus and potash | 3.41 | 2.00 | 5.44 | 4.35 | 1.78 | 3.39 6.) ‘Cheek 2° 2g 2 2 l8tSSh 2 MON E5232; |) 3:60) | MEZA Bele 7 | Complete fertilizer ; lime | 4.69 | 2.38 | 5.62 | 4.80 | 3.04 | 4.10 8 | Complete fertilizer . .| 4.66 | 2.07 | 5.71 | 4.98 | 2.72 | 4.02 9 | Nitrogen and phosphorus} 4.99 | 2.04 | 5.35 | 4.89 | 2.61 | 3.97 10 | Nitrogen and potash . | 4.79 | 2.26 | 5.91 | 4.89 | 3.07 | 4.18 11 | Phosphorus and potash | 4.99 | 1.87 | 5.03 | 4.21 | 1.97 | 3.61 FERTILIZERS FOR GRAPES 101 TaBLE II. — AVERAGE INCREASE IN GRAPE YIELDS AND AVERAGE FINANCIAL GAIN FROM FrRTILIZER APPLICATIONS N = nitrogen, P = phosphorus, K = potassium, Ca = lime. Gains in tons per acre. Brae Ln, By ey NP. N, K. P, K. . Tons } Tons ; Tons Tons Tons First plat of pair , a.01 3.96 3.83 Doc 3.39 Second plat of pair . 4.10 4.02 3.97 4.18 3.61 AGOLAOG” ot. 3.80 3.97 3.90 4.02 3.50 Cheek plat SEW 3.12 yall ole 3.12 3.12 Average gain es 68 85 78 90 .o8 Average financial gain) $5.82 | $13.84 | $14.05 | $18.54 $6.99 From this last table the benefit from nitrogen appears quite evident since every combination in which it appears gives a substantial gain over the one from which it is absent. Phos. phorus and potassium without the nitrogen, lead to only a slight increase over the check; and lime appears to be of no benefit. Financially, the complete fertilizer and lime com- bination, the nitrogen and phosphorus combination and the phosphorus and potassium combination failed to pay their cost in five of the ten comparisons; the complete fertilizer was used at a loss four times out of ten; and the nitrogen and potas- sium combination three times out of ten. Lime had no appreciable effect on either vines or fruit. “No effect of the fertilizers on the fruit itself, aside from yield, was shown for the first three years; but in 1912, and even more markedly in 1913, the fruit from the plats on which nitrogen had been used was superior in compactness of cluster, size of cluster and size of berry. In 1912 also, when early ripen- ing was a decided advantage, the fruit on the nitrogen plats matured earlier than that on the check plats. In 1913 the 102 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING favorable ripening season and the smaller crop tended to equalize the time of ripening on all plats. The grapes on the phosphorus-potassium plats were better in quality than those in the check plats but not as good as those on the plats where nitrogen was used. “Other indexes also show plainly the benefit from nitrogen in this vineyard; for size and weight of leaf, weight of wood produced and number of fruiting canes left on the vines were all greater where fertilizers, and particularly nitrogen, had been used. The three-year averages (1911-1913) of the measure- ments for these characteristics are shown in Table III: Tasie III]. — Comparative Propuction or LEAVES, Woop AND Fruitinc CANES ON GRAPE VINES DIFFERENTLY FERTILIZED (Averages for three years.) FERTILIZER APPLICATION Lear WeicutT!|Woop Prunep? oe Grams. Lbs. Complete fertilizer; lime . . 1,033 1,295 2,468 Complete fertilizer . .. . 1,010 1,367 2,609 Nitrogen and phosphorus . . 1,047 1,272 2,585 Nitrogen and potassium Sas 1,069 1,401 2,646 Phosphorus and potassium : 964 1,086 2,326 Chéeeke sit ee eee 930 915 2,110 Codperative experiments. “Tn order to secure informationas to the behavior of fertilizers on the different soils of the Grape Belt, co6perative tests were carried on in six vineyards owned, respectively, by S. S. Gran- din, Westfield; Hon. C. M. Hamilton, State Line; James Lee, Brocton; H.S. Miner, Dunkirk; Miss Frances Jennings, Sil- 1 Hach weight is of 300 green leaves, 5 from each of 60 vines. The first leaf beyond the last cluster was selected. 2 Amount to the acre of wood pruned in fall. 3’ Number to the acre. FERTILIZERS FOR GRAPES 103 ver Creek; and J. T. Barnes, Prospect Station. The soil in these vineyards included gravelly loam, shale loam and clay loam, all in the Dunkirk series, and the experiments covered from two to two and a half acres in three cases and about five acres in each of the other vineyards. ‘The work continued four years in all but one of the experiments, which it was necessary to end after the second year. “The general plan of the tests was much like that at Fre- donia in most of the vineyards, with the additions of plats for stable manure and for leguminous and non-leguminous cover crops with and without lime. From two to six check plats were left for comparison in each vineyard. As already stated the results were often inconsistent in duplicate plats in the same vineyard, and if one test appeared to point definitely in a certain direction, the indication would be negatived by results in other vineyards. In these experiments the yield of fruit was the only index to the effect of treatments as it was not possi- ble to weigh leaves or pruned wood, or to count the canes left. “Nitrogen and potassium in combination, which gave the largest gains and greatest profit in the Station vineyard at Fredonia, showed a 13 per ct. increase in yield on one plat in the Jennings vineyard and a 9 per ct. decrease on the other; in the Miner vineyard this combination apparently resulted in a 25 per ct. increase; in the Lee vineyard in a 2% per ct. loss; in the Hamilton vineyard a 17 per ct. gain; and in the Grandin vineyard neither gain nor loss. In only two of the five vine- yards in which this combination was tested was the gain great enough to pay the cost of the fertilizer applied. Similar dis- crepancies, or absence of profitable gain, mark the use of the other fertilizer combinations. “Even stable manure, the standby of the farmer and fruit- grower, when applied at the rate of five tons per acre each spring, and plowed in, did not, on the average, pay for itself. Indeed, there were few instances among the 60 comparisons 104 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING possible, in which more than a very moderate profit could be credited to manure. The average increase in yield following the application of manure alone was less than a quarter of a ton of grapes to the acre; while the use of lime with the manure increased the gain to one-third of a ton per acre. The ton of lime to the acre annually would not be paid for by the gain of 175 pounds of grapes. Cover-crops were used in five of the s1x coOperative experiments and proved even less adapted to increasing crop yields than did the manure. There was no ap- preciable gain, on the average, from the use of mammoth clover ; indeed, a slight loss must be recorded for the clover except upon the plats which were also limed, and even with the lime the average yields on check plats and mammoth clover plats differed by only one one-hundredth of a ton. Wheat or barley with cowhorn turnips made a slightly better showing, as the plats on which these crops were turned under, without lime, averaged about one-twentieth of a ton to the acre better than the checks. With these non-legumes, lime was apparently a detriment, as the plants with the lime yielded a tenth of a ton less, on the average, than those without it.” Practical lessons from the Fredonia experiment. From this experiment it becomes clear that the use of fer- tilizers in a vineyard is a local problem. General advice is of little value. It is evident also that the fertilization of vine- yards is so involved with other factors that only carefully planned and long continued work will give reliable information as to the needs of vines. Indeed, field experiments even in carefully selected vineyards, as the codperative experiments show, may be so contradictory and misleading as to be worse than useless, if deductions are made from the results of a few seasons. ‘The experiment, however, has brought forth informa- tion about fertilizing vineyards that ought to be most helpful to grape-growers. ‘Thus, the results suggest : FERTILIZERS FOR GRAPES 105 Only vineyards in good condition respond to fertilizers. It is usually waste to make applications of fertilizers in poorly drained vineyards, in such as suffer from winter cold or spring frosts, where insect pests are epidemic and uncon- trolled or where good care is lacking. The experiments fur- nish several examples of inertness, ineffectiveness or failure to produce profit when the fertilizers were applied under any of the conditions named. They emphasize the importance of pay- ing attention to all of the factors on which plant growth is de- pendent. Moisture, soil temperature, aération, the texture of the soil, freedom from pests, cold and frosts, as well as the supply of food may limit the yield of grapes. A vineyard soil may have a one-sided wear. It is certain in some of the experiments and strongly indi- cated in others that the soil is having a one-sided wear — that only one or a yery few of the elements of fertility are lacking. The element most frequently lacking is nitrogen. Exception will probably be found in very light sands or gravels which are often deficient in potash and the phosphates; or on soils so shallow or of such mechanical texture that the root range of the vine is limited; or in soils so wet or so dry as to limit the root range or prevent biological activities. These exceptions mean, as a rule, that the soils possessing the unfavorable qual- ities are unfitted for grape-growing. The grape-grower should try to discover which of the fertilizing elements his soil lacks and not waste by using elements not needed. Grape soils are often uneven. The marked unevenness of the soil in the seven vineyards in which these experiments were carried on, as indicated by the crops and the effects of the fertilizers, furnishes food for thought to grape-growers. Maximum profits cannot be approached 106 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING in vineyards in which the soil is as uneven as in these, which were in every case selected because there was an appearance of uniformity. A problem before grape-growers is to make uniform all conditions in their vineyards, and the vines must be kept free from pests if fertilizers are to be profitably used. How a grape-grower may know when his vines need fertilizers. A grape-grower may assume that his vines do not need fer- tilizers if they are vigorous and making a fair annual growth. When the vineyard is found to be failing in vigor, the first step to be taken is to make sure that the drainage is good ; the second step, to control insect and fungous pests; the third, to give tillage and good care; and the fourth step is to apply fertilizers if they be found necessary. Few vineyards will be found to require a complete fertilizer. What the special requirements of a vineyard are can be ascertained only by experiment and are probably not ascertainable by analyses of the soil. This experiment furnishes suggestions as to how the grape-grower may test the value of fertilizers in his own vineyard. Applying fertilizers. When it is certain that vines need fertilization, and what is wanted is known, the fertilizers should be put on in the spring and be worked in by the spring cultivation. Stable manure should be plowed under. Grape roots forage throughout the whole top layer of soil so that the land should be covered with the fertilizer, whether chemical or barnyard manure. Applica- tions of commercial fertilizers are generally spread broadcast, though it is better to drill them in if the foliage is out on the vines and thus avoid possible injury to tender foliage. Com- mercial fertilizers should be mixed thoroughly and in a finely divided state. In leachy soils, nitrate of soda ought not to be applied too early in the season, as it will quickly wash down out of reach of the grape roots. i a Puate VIII. — Brighton (xX #). FERTILIZERS FOR GRAPES 107 Over-rich soils. Some soils are too rich for the grape. On these the growth is over-luxuriant, the wood does not mature in the autumn, fruit- buds do not form and the fruit is poor in quality. Certain varieties can stand a richer soil than others. Over-richness is a trouble that may cure itself as the vines come in full bearing and make greater demands on the soil for food. It is well, however, on a soil that is suspected of being too rich or so proved by the behavior of the vines, to provide an extra wire on the trellis, to prune little and thus take care of the rampant growth. Some soils, however, and this is often the case, are so rich that the grape cannot be made to thrive in them; the vines waste their substance in riotous living, producing luxuri- ant foliage and lusty wood but little or no fruit. CHAPTER VII PRUNING THE GRAPE IN EASTERN AMERICA THE inexperienced look on pruning as a difficult operation in grape-growing. But once a few fundamentals are grasped, grape-pruning is not difficult. There is much less perplexity in pruning the grape than in pruning tree-fruits. Pruning fol- lows accepted patterns in every grape region, and when the pattern is learned the difficulties are easily overcome. The inexperienced are confused by the array of “principles,” “types,” “methods,” “systems” and the many technical terms that enter into discussions of grape-pruning. Some of the technicalities come from European practices, and others originated in the infancy of grape-growing in this country when there was great diversity in pruning. Divested of much that is but jargon, an inexperienced man can easily learn in a few lessons, from word of mouth or printed page, how to prune grapes. The simplicity of pruning has led to slighting the work in commercial vineyards, by too often trusting it to unskilled hands. Then, too, in this age of power-propelled tools, pride in hand labor has been left behind. and few grape-growers now take time and trouble to become expert in pruning. Simple as the work may seem to those long accustomed to it, he who wants to put into his pruning painstaking intel- ligence and to taste the joy of a task well done finds in this 108 PRUNING THE GRAPE IN EASTERN AMERICA 109 vineyard operation an ample field for pleasure and for the de- velopment of greater profits. The price to be paid by those who would thus attempt perfection in pruning the vine is forward vision, the mechanic’s eye, the gardener’s touch, patience, and pride in handicraft. Simple as pruning is, the pruner soon learns that it is an art in which perfection is better known in mind than followed in deed. The theory is easy but there are some stumbling blocks to make its consummation difficult. It is an art in which rules do not suffice, for no two vineyards can be pruned alike in amount or method, and every grape-grower finds his vine- yard a proper field for the gratification of his taste in pruning. Happily, however, enlightened theory and sound practice are in perfect accord in grape-pruning, so that specific advice is well founded on governing principles. One cannot, of course, learn to prune unless he understands the habit of the grape-vine and is familiar with the terms ap- plied to the different parts of the vine. As a preliminary to this chapter, therefore, knowledge of Chapter XVII, in which the structure of the grape-vine is discussed, is necessary. The next step is to distinguish between pruning and training. PRUNING AND TRAINING DISTINGUISHED = The grape is pruned to increase in various ways the economic value of the plant by increasing the quantity and value of the crop. This is pruning proper. Or grapes are pruned to make well-proportioned plants with the parts so disposed that the vines are to the highest degree manageable in the vineyard. This is training. To repeat, the grape-plant is pruned to regu- late the crop; it is trained to regulate the vine. Grape-grow- ers usually speak of both operations as “pruning,” but it is better to keep in mind the two conceptions. The distinctions between pruning and training must be made more apparent by 110 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING setting forth in greater detail the results attained by the two operations. Results attained in pruning to regulate the crop. Proper pruning of vines in their first year in the vineyard, which, as we have seen, consists of cutting the young plants back severely, brings the vines in productive bearing a year or two years earlier than they would have borne had the pruning been neglected. This early pruning, since it is done with an eye to the vigor of each vine, insures greater uniformity in the growth and productiveness of the vineyard. Uniformity thus brought about is important not only for the time being, but for the fu- ture development of the vines, since weak vines, if unpruned, are stunted and may require years to overtake more vigorous vines in the vineyard. The quality of the crop may be regulated by pruning. When vines bear too heavily, the grapes are small, and wine-makers have found that they seldom develop sugar and flavor as do grapes on vines not overbearing. Grapes on vines too heavily laden seldom ripen or color well. Not only are the grapes on poorly pruned and unpruned vines poor in quality but the grapes on such vines are usually not well distributed and there- fore ripen and color unevenly. The results just mentioned follow because the bunches in a poorly distributed crop receive varying amounts of light and heat depending on the distance from the ground, the distance from the trunk and on the amount of shade. Pruning may be used to regulate the quantity of grapes borne in a vineyard and so be made somewhat helpful in pre- venting alternate bearing. Abnormally large crops are usually followed by partial crop failure and biennial bearing some- times sets in, but the large crop may be reduced by pruning and the evil consequences wholly or partly avoided. It fol- lows that pruning must depend much on the vigor of the vine; PRUNING THE GRAPE IN EASTERN AMERICA 11 for a weak vine may be so pruned as to cause it to overbear ; and, on the other hand, a vigorous vine pruned in the same way might not bear at all. Results attained in pruning to regulate the vine. It is necessary to regulate the shape of the vine by training so that tilling, spraying, pruning and harvesting can be easily performed and the crop be kept off the ground. The cost of production is always less in a well-pruned vineyard because all vineyard operations are more easily carried out. The life of a vineyard is lengthened when the vines are well trained, because when the parts of a vine are properly disposed on trellis or stake the plants are less often injured in vineyard operations. Moreover, not infrequently vines die from over- production and consequent breaking of canes or trunks which might have been prevented by pruning to shape the vine. Suckers and water-sprouts are less common on well-trained vines. It is necessary, too, by training to keep the bunches away from trunk, canes and other bunches and so prevent injury to the grapes. Lastly, fashion, taste or a more or less abnormal use of the grapes, may prescribe the form in which a vine is trained. Fashion and taste run from very simple or natural styles to exceedingly complex, formal ones, depending, often, on the variety, the environment or other condition, but just as often on the whim of the grape-grower. The grape is a favorite orna- mental for fences, arbors and to cover buildings; for all of these purposes the vines must be trained as occasion calls. SoME PRINCIPLES OF PRUNING Leaving the shaping of the plant out of consideration and having in mind pruning proper, all efforts in pruning are di- rected toward two objects: (1) The production of leafy shoots 112 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING to increase the vigor of the plant. (2) The promotion of the formation of fruit-buds. The first, in common parlance, is pruning for wood; the second, pruning for fruit. Pruning for wood. Some grapes, In common with varieties of all fruits, produce excessive crops of fruit so that the plants exhaust themselves, to their permanent injury and to the detriment of the crop. Something must be done to restore and increase vegetative vigor. The most natural procedure is to lessen the struggle for existence among the parts of the plant. The richer and the more abundant the supply of the food solution, the greater the vegetative activity, the larger the leaves and the larger and stouter the internodes. Obviously, the supply of food solu- tion for each bud may be increased by decreasing the number of buds. The weaker the plants, therefore, the more the vine should be cut. The severe pruning in the first two years of the vine’s existence is an example of pruning for wood. The vine is pruned for wood in the resting period between the fall of leaf and the swelling of buds the following spring. Pruning for fruit. Growers of all fruits soon learn that excessive vegetative ' vigor is not usually accompanied by fruitfulness. Too great vigor is indicated by long, leafy, unbranching shoots. Some fruit-growers go so far as to say that fruitfulness is inversely proportionate to vegetative vigor. There are several methods of diminishing the vigor of the vine; as, withholding water and fertilizers, stopping tillage, the method of training and by pruning. Pruning is used to decrease the vigor of the vine, in theory at least, for the practice is not always so successful, by pruning the roots or by summer-pruning the shoots. Root-pruning the grape at intervals of several years is a regular practice with some varieties in warm countries, Eu- PRUNING THE GRAPE IN EASTERN AMERICA 113 rope more especially, but is seldom or never practiced in Amer- ica except when planting and when roots arise from the cion above the union of stock and cion. Summer-pruning to induce fruitfulness consists In removing new shoots with newly developed leaves. These young shoots have been developed from reserve material stored up the pre- ceding season, and until they are so far developed that they can perform the functions of leaves they are to be counted as para- sites. When, therefore, these shoots are pruned or pinched away, the plant is robbed of the material used by the lusty shoot which up to this time has given nothing in return. The vigor of the plant is thus checked and fruitfulness increased. Sum- mer-pruning may become harmful if delayed too long. The time to prune Is past with the grape when the leaves have passed from the light green color of new growth to the dark green of mature leaves. Fruit-bearing may be augmented by bending, twisting or ringing the canes, since all of these operations diminish vegeta- tive vigor. Ringing is the only one of these methods in general use, and this only for some special variety or special purpose, and usually with the result that the vigor of the vine is dimin- ished too much for the good of the plant. Ringing is discussed more fully in Chapter XVI. The manner of fruit-bearing in the grape. Before attempting to prune, the pruner must understand precisely how the grape bears its crop. The fruit is borne near the base of the shoots of the current season, and the shoots are borne on the wood of the previous year’s growth coming from a dormant bud. Here is manifested one of Nature’s energy- saving devices, shoot, leaves, flowers and fruit spring in a short season from a single bud. In the light of this fact, pruning should be looked on as a simple problem to be solved mathe- matically and not as a puzzle to be untangled, as so many re- I 114 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING gard it. For an example, a problem in pruning is here stated and solved. A thrifty grape-vine should yield, let us say, fifteen pounds of grapes, a fair average for the mainstay varieties. Each bunch will weigh from a quarter to a half pound. To produce fifteen pounds on a vine, therefore, will require from thirty to sixty bunches. As each shoot will bear two or three bunches, from fifteen to thirty buds must be left on the canes of the precedirg year. These buds are selected in pruning on one or more canes distributed on one or two main stems in such manner as the pruner may choose, but usually in accordance with one or another of several well-developed methods of training. Pru i- ing, then, consists in calculating the number of bunches ad buds necessary and removing the remainder. In essere pruning is thinning. Horizontal versus perpendicular canes. An old dictum of viticulture is that the nearer the growing parts of the vine approach the perpendicular, the more vigorous the parts. The terminal buds, as every grape-grower knows, grow very rapidly and probably absorb, unless checked, more than their share of the energy of the vine. This tendency can be checked somewhat by removing the terminal buds, which also helps to keep the plants within manageable limits, but is better controlled by training the canes to horizontal positions. Grape canes are tied horizontally to wires to make the vines more manageable and to reduce their vigorand so induce fruitful- ness; they are trained vertically to increase the vigor of the vine. Winter-pruning. Winter-pruning of the vineyard may be done at any time from the dropping of the leaves in the autumn to the swelling of the buds in the spring. The sap begins to circulate actively in the grape early in the spring, even to the extremities of the vine, Puiate IX. — Campbell Early (x). PRUNING THE GRAPE IN EASTERN AMERICA 115 and most grape-growers believe this sap to be a “vital stream” and that, if the vine is pruned during its flow, the plant will bleed to death. The vine, however, is at this season of so drop- sical a constitution that the loss of sap is better denominated “weeping” than “bleeding.” It is doubtful whether serious injury results from pruning after the sap begins to flow, but it is a safe practice to prune earlier and the work is certainly pleasanter. The vine should not be pruned when the wood is frozen, since at this time the canes are brittle and easily broken in handling. On the other hand, it is well to delay pruning in northern climates until after a heavy freeze in the autumn, to winterkill and wither immature wood so that it can be re- moved in pruning. Summer-pruning. There are three kinds of summer-pruning, the removal of superfluous shoots, heading-in canes to keep the vines in man- ageable limits and the pruning to induce fruitfulness discussed on a foregoing page, which need not have further consideration. It is very essential that the grower keep these three purposes in mind, especially as there is much dispute as to the necessity of two of these operations. All agree that the vine usually bears superfluous shoots that should be removed. These are such as spring from small, weak buds or from buds on the arms and trunk of the vine. These shoots are useless, devitalize the vine, and hinder vine- yard operations. A good practice is to rub off the buds from which these shoots grow as they are detected, but in most vine- yards the vines must be gone over from time to time as the shoots appear. Still another kind of superfluous shoots, which ought to be removed as they appear, are those which grow from the base of the season’s shoots, the so-called secondary or axil- lary shoots. These are usually “broken out’’ at the time the shoots from weak buds are removed. 116 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING While there is doubt as to the value of heading-back the vine in the summer for the sole purpose of inducing fruitful- ness, there can be no doubt that it is desirable for the purpose of keeping some varieties within bounds. Heading-back is not now the major operation it once was, the need of severe cutting being obviated by putting the vines farther apart, by training high on three or even four wires and by adopting one of the drooping systems of training. The objections to head- ing-back in the summer are that it often unduly weakens the vines, that it may induce a growth of laterals which thicken the vines too much, and that it delays the maturing of the wood. These bad effects, however, can be overcome by prun- ing lightly and doing the work so late in the season that lateral growths will not start. Most vineyardists who keep their plantations up find it necessary to head back more or less, de- pending on the season and the variety. The work is usually done when the over-luxuriant shoots begin to touch the ground. The shoots are then topped off with a sickle, corn-cutter or similar tool. RENEWING FrRuITING Woop There are two ways of renewing the fruiting wood on a grape-vine, by canes and from spurs. The manner of renew- ing refers to pruning and not to training, for either can be used in any method of training. Cane renewals. Renewal by canes is made each year by taking one or more canes, cut to the desired number of buds, to supply bearing shoots. By this method the most of the bearing wood is re- moved each year, new canes taking the place of the old. These renewal canes may be taken either from the head of the vine or from the ground, though the latter is little used except where PRUNING THE GRAPE IN EASTERN AMERICA 117 vines must be laid down for winter protection. Canes may be renewed indefinitely, if care is exercised in keeping the stubs short, without enlarging the head from which the canes are taken out of proportion to the size of the trunk. Renewing by canes is a more common method than renewal by spurs, as will be found in the discussion of methods of training. Spur renewal. In renewing by spurs, a permanent arm is established to right and left on the canes. Shoots on this arm are not permit- ted to remain as canes but are cut back to spurs in the dor- mant pruning. ‘Two buds are left at this pruning, both of which will produce bearing shoots; the lower one, however, is not suffered to do so but is kept to furnish the spur for the next season. The shoot from the upper bud is cut away entirely. When this process is carried on from year to year, the spurs become longer and longer until they become unwieldy. Occasionally, however, happy chance permits the selection of a shoot on the old wood for a new spur. Failing in this, a new arm must Fic. 13. Vine ready for pruning; 7, the be laid down and the stem; g, arms; d, canes; s, shoots; |, spurs. : The faint lines near the bases of the canes in- spurring goes on as be- dicate the points where they should be pruned fore. The objections off in the winter, leaving spurs for the produc- tion of shoots the following season. to renewing by spurs are: it is often difficult to replace spurs with new wood, and the bearing portion of the vine gets farther and farther from the trunk. For these reasons, spur-renewing is generally in disfavor with commercial grape-growers, though it is still used 118 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING in one or two prominent methods of training, as will be dis- covered in this discussion. Figure 13 shows a vine ready for pruning. Tue Work oF PRUNING The pruner may take his choice between several styles of hand pruning-shears with which to do his work. The knife is seldom used except in summer-pruning, and here, more often, the shoots are broken out or pinched out. In winter- pruning, the cane is cut an inch or thereabout beyond the last bud it is desired to leave; otherwise the bud may die from the drying out of the cane. The canes are usually allowed to remain tied to the wires until the pruning is done, though growers who use the Kniffin method of training may cut them loose before they prune. Two men working together do the work of pruning best. The more skilled of the two severs the wood from the bearing vine, leaving just the number of buds desired for the next season’s crop. The less skilled man cuts tendrils and severs the cut canes from each other so that the prunings may be moved from the vineyard without trouble by the “stripper.” Not the least of the tasks of pruning is “stripping” the brush and getting it out of the vineyard. The prunings cling to the trellis with considerable tenacity and must be pulled loose with a peculiar jerk, learned by practice, and placed on the ground between the rows. Stripping is done, usually by cheap labor, at any time after the pruning until spring, but must not be delayed until growth starts or the young buds may suffer as the cut wood is torn from the trellis. The brush is hauled to the end of the row by hand or by horse-power applied to any one of a dozen devices used in the several grape regions. One of the best is the device in common use in the Chautauqua vineyards of western New York. A pole, twelve feet long, four inches in diameter at the butt and two at the top, is bored with PRUNING THE GRAPE IN EASTERN AMERICA 119 an inch hole four feet from the butt. A horse is hitched to this pole by a rope drawn through the hole, and the pole, butt to the ground, is then pulled between rows, the small end being held in the right hand. The pole, when skill- fully used, collects the brush, which is dumped at the end of the row by letting the small end fly over towards the horse. The “ go-devil,” shown in Fig. 14, is another common device for collecting prunings. Fic. 14. A ‘‘go-devil’’ for collecting prunings. THe TRELLIS The trellis is a considerable item in the grape-grower’s bud- get, since it must be renewed every fifteen years or thereabouts. Wires are strung in the North at the end of the second season after planting, but in the South the growth is often so great that the wires must be put up at the end of the first season. Trellises are of the same general style for commercial vineyards ; namely, two or three wires tautly stretched on firmly set posts. Occasionally slat trellises are put up in gardens but these are not to be recommended for any but ornamental purposes. Posts. Strong, durable posts of chestnut, locust, cedar, oak or reén- forced cement are placed at such distance apart that two or three vines can be set between each two posts. The distance apart depends on the distance between vines, although the tendency now is to have three vines between two posts. The posts are from six to eight feet in length, the heaviest being used as end posts. In hard stony soils it may be necessary to 120 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING set the end posts with a spade, but usually sharpened posts can be driven into holes made with a crow-bar. In driving, the operator stands on a wagon hauled by a horse and uses a ten- or twelve-pound maul. The posts are driven to a depth of eight- een or twenty-four inches for the end posts. However set, the posts must stand firm to hold the load of vines and fruit. The end posts must be braced. As good a brace as any is made yall oe beara . = a TS A be y \ \: ‘ : “ a hA\, h (7 Aa Ao Tn de ‘\\ \| Y | ff Niu Wid, 4 “tl Ural SY Ue Fic, 15. A trellis and a common method of bracing end posts. from a four-by-four timber, notched to fit the post halfway up from the ground, and extending obliquely to the ground, where it is held by a four-by-four stake. A two-wire trellis and a common method of bracing end posts are shown in Fig. 15. The posts on hillsides must lean slightly up-hill, otherwise they will almost certainly sooner or later tilt down the slope. The posts are usually permitted to stand a little higher at first than necessary so that they may be driven down should occasion call; driving is usually done in the early spring. PRUNING THE GRAPE IN EASTERN AMERICA 121 Wire for the trellis. Four sizes of wire are in common use for vineyard trellises ; nos. 9, 10, 11 and 12. Number 9, the heaviest, is often used for the top wire with lighter wires lower. The following figures show the length of wire in a ton: No. 9, 34,483 ft. Wo. 11, 52,352) ft. No. 10, 41,408 ft. No. 12, 68,493 ft. From these figures the number of pounds required to the acre is easily calculated. Common annealed wire makes a durable trellis, but many growers prefer the more durable galvanized wire, the cost of which is slightly greater. The wires are fastened to the end posts by winding once around the post, and then each wire is firmly looped about itself; they are se- cured to the intervening posts by ordinary fence staples so driven that the wire cannot pull through of its own weight but with space enough to permit tightening from season to season. The size and length of the staples depend on whether the posts are hard or soft wood. The longest and largest staples are used with soft woods, as cedar or chestnut. An acre requires from nine to twelve pounds of staples. The wires should be placed on the windward sides of posts and on the up-hill side in hillside vineyards. The distance between wires depends on the method of pruning. The wires must be stretched taut on the posts, for which purpose any one of a half-dozen good wire stretchers may be purchased at hardware stores. Some growers loosen the wires after harvest to allow for the contraction in cold weather and others use some one of several devices to relieve the strain. Most growers, however, find it necessary to go over the vine- yard each spring to drive down loosened posts and stretch sagging wires, and so take no precautions to release wires in the fall. All agree that the wires must be kept tight during 122 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING the growing season to protect buds, foliage and fruit from being injured from whipping. Tying. The canes are tied to the trellis in early spring, and under most systems of pruning the growing shoots are tied in the summer. This work is done by cheap men, women, boys and girls. A great variety of material is used to make the tie, as raffia, wooltwine, willow, inner bark of the linden or bass- wood, green rye straw, corn husks, carpet-rags and wire. The same materials are not usually employed for both canes and shoots, since the canes are tied firmly to hold them steady and the work is done early before there is danger of breaking swell- ing buds, while the summer shoots are tied to hold for a shorter time and more loosely to permit growth in diameter. Tying usually follows accepted patterns in one region but varies greatly in different regions. There is a knack to be learned in the use of each one of the materials named, but with none is it difficult, and an ingenious person can easily contrive a tie of his own to suit fancy or conditions. Ys Piate X.— Clinton (xX). ee y Bo ae te: = : ’ CHAPTER VIII METHODS OF TRAINING GRAPES IN EASTERN AMERICA THE grape-grower takes great liberties with Nature in train- ing his plants. No other fruit is so completely transformed by the grower’s art from its natural habit of growth. Happily, the grape endures cutting well, and the pruner may rest as- sured that he may work his will in pruning his vines, following ‘to his heart’s desire a favorite method with little fear of seri- ously injuring his vines., Because of its accommodation to the desires of man in the disposition of the vine, there are many methods of training the grape; there being in the commercial vineyards of eastern America a dozen or more. However, the differences and similarities are so marked that the several methods fall into a simple classification which makes con- spicuous their chief features. Thus, all of the methods fall under two chief heads: (1) The disposition of shoots; (2) the disposition of canes. The disposition of shoots. Bearing shoots are disposed of in three ways in training grapes; shoots upright, shoots drooping, and shoots hori- zontal. The terms explain themselves, but the three methods need amplification since their adoption is not optional with growers but depends on several circumstances. Shoots are trained upright in several methods in which two or more arms or canes are laid to right and left, sometimes 123 124 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING horizontally, sometimes obliquely along or across horizontal wires. As the shoots grow upward, they are tied to wires above. The upright methods are supposed to distribute the bearing wood more evenly on the vines and to insure greater uniformity in the fruit. In the upright methods, also, the canes and arms are let nearer the ground, which is thought to be an advantage in small, weak or slow-growing varieties. Dela- ware, Catawba, Iona and Diana are examples of varieties thought to grow best when trained to one of the upright methods. In the several methods in which the shoots droop, however the canes may be disposed, the shoots are not tied but are allowed to droop at will. These methods are comparatively new but are being rapidly adopted because of several marked advantages. Usually one less wire can be used in a drooping method than in an upright one; since the shoots are not tied, much labor is saved in summer tying; the ground can be tilled with less danger to the vines; and there is less sun- scalding of the fruit, since the pendant foliage protects the clusters. Grape-growers generally agree that strong-growing varieties like Concord, Niagara, Brighton, Diamond and most of the hybrids between European grapes and native species grow best when the shoots droop. Shoots are trained horizontally in but one recognized method, the Hudson Horizontal, to be described in detail later. Since this method is all but obsolete,.there is still less reason for dis- cussing it here, the expressive name sufficing for present pur- poses. Disposition of canes. There are many recognized methods of disposing of the canes in training the grape. The chief of these are discussed in the pages that follow, their names being set down for the present in the classification that follows. TRAINING GRAPES IN EASTERN AMERICA 125 CLASSIFICATION OF METHODS OF TRAINING THE GRAPE IN EASTERN AMERICA I. Shoots upright : 1. Chautauqua Arm. 2. Keuka High Renewal. 3. Fan. Il. Shoots drooping: 1. Single-stem, Four-cane Kniffin. Two-stem, Four-cane Kniffin. Umbrella Kniffin. Y-stem Kniffin. Munson. III. Shoots horizontal : 1. Hudson Horizontal. ib hs I. Shoots wpright Systematic training of the grape in America began toward the middle of the nineteenth century with a method in which the shoots were trained upright from two permanent hori- zontal arms. ‘These arms are laid to right and left on a low wire and bear more or less permanent spurs, from each of which two shoots are produced each season to bear the crop. The number of spurs left on each arm depends on the vigor of the vine and the space between vines. As the shoots grow up- ward, they are tied to upper wires, there being three wires on the trellis for this method. This method is now known as the Horizontal Arm Spur. It has a serious fault in its trouble- some spurs and has almost entirely given way to a modifica- tion called the Chautauqua Arm method, much used in the great Chautauqua grape-belt. As one of the chief methods of training the grape in eastern America, this must be de- scribed in detail. The Chautauqua Arm method. The trellis for this method has two wires, although occasion- ally three are used. The lower wire is eighteen or twenty 126 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING inches above the ground and the second thirty-four inches above the lower. If three are used, the wires are twenty inches apart. F. E. Gladwin, in charge of the vineyard lab- oratory of the New York Agricultural Experiment Station at Fredonia, in the heart of the Chautauqua belt, describes this method of training as follows: “The vines are cut back to two buds at each pruning the first two years. If the vines are vigorous two canes are tied up at the beginning of the third year; if scant, but one is left and this, if the growth is extremely unfavorable, is cut back to two buds. The canes are carried up obliquely to the upper wire when the growth permits and are there firmly tied either with twine or fine wire, the latter being more commonly used. The canes are also loosely tied to the lower wire. The pruning for the fourth year consists in cutting away all but two or three canes and a number of spurs from the arms formed by tying up the two canes the previous year. The vine now consists of two arms, arising from near the ground, with two or three canes of the previous year, and several two-bud spurs at in- tervals along the arms. As far as possible such canes as have arisen but a short distance above the lower wire are selected. All the old wood projecting beyond the last cane retained on each of the arms is cut away. The arms of the third year are bent down from their oblique position and are tied firmly to the lower wire, to the right and left of the center of the vine. These are now permanent arms. The vine at this time consists of two arms, arising from near the ground, tied to the lower wire to the right and left of the center, and on these are two or three canes, pruned long enough to reach to the middle wire at least, and if possible to the upper. They are tied so that they stand in a vertical or oblique position. Along the arms at intervals of a few inches are spurs, consisting of two buds. If the vinevardist maintains the arms permanently, these spurs furnish the fruiting wood for the succeeding year. TRAINING GRAPES IN EASTERN AMERICA 127 “ At the pruning for the fifth year one of the arms is cut away entirely, close to the point of its origin. The remaining arm, reaching from the ground to a point a few inches below the level of the lower wire, now becomes the permanent stem. The vineyardist must now provide for the arm cut away. This is done by the selection of a cane, arising from the re- maining arm at a point below the lower wire, either directly, Fie. 16. Chautauqua training; vine ready to prune. or from a spur left for the purpose. This is pruned to reach the top wire and is tied obliquely to it. This cane at the next pruning is tied down to the lower wire and becomes the second arm. Then the same selection of canes and spurs is made from it as was made at the previous pruning, and the canes are tied up as before. However, if the grower desires to retain both arms of the preceding year for a few years, canes that have grown from the spurs may be tied up and provision made for the following year through further spurring. If but a single 128 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING arm is retained, it is pruned in the same way. Spurs may be obtained from canes that have arisen from dormant buds on the arm, or by spurring in the basal canes of the fruiting wood of the year previous. A combination of both methods of re- newal will in the long run work out the better, as the repeated spurring in of the basal canes will result in greatly lengthened spurs that will require frequent cutting out. While the canes that arise directly from dormant buds on wood two years and over are not necessarily the best fruiting ones, they can, how- ever, be utilized for renewal purposes. “The ideal vine pruned to this system now consists of a stem reaching from sixteen or eighteen inches above the ground level or a few inches below the level of the lower wire. Such a vine is shown in Figure 16. From the head two arms arise, one extending to the right, the other to the left and tied along the lower wire, each arm not extending for more than two feet and a half to either side of the head. From the arms two canes on each are tied vertically or obliquely to the top wire. In addition there are left two or three spurs, growing from the upper side of each arm, located at well-spaced intervals starting close to the head; these may be used for the renewal of the arms. The shoots are not tied. “One of the chief faults of the Chautauqua Arm methed is the tendency of the best matured, and most desirable canes to develop at or near the upper wire, while those lower down are often too short, or so poorly matured as to be unfitted for fruiting purposes. When the wood, bearing the well-developed upper canes, is brought down for arms, a considerable interval of the arm from the head to the point where the canes arise is without fruiting wood. Under such conditions the growth will be again thrown to the extremities. If spurring on the arms has been practiced, this undesirable condition is eliminated. With either type of renewal, spurring should be practiced. The fruit from vines trained by this method reaches its highest TRAINING GRAPES IN EASTERN AMERICA 129 development at or near the level of the upper wire, that on the lower shoots is, as a rule, quite inferior. This comes from the fact that the sap flow is more vigorous at these upper points, resulting in more and healthier leaves, which, in turn, influence the fruit for the better.”’ Keuka High Renewal. Several methods of training pass under the general term “High Renewal,” the significance of which becomes apparent in the discussion of the Keuka High Renewal method which is probably now the most common of the several types. In most of these methods the trellis is put up with three wires, but oceasionally only two wires are used and still less often four. The lowest wire on the three-wire trellis is eighteen or twenty inches from the ground with twenty-inch intervals between wires. Gladwin, who has direct charge of vineyard experimental work about Keuka Lake for the New York Agricultural Experiment Station, describes current practices in pruning according to this method as follows: “At each pruning for the first two years the vines are cut back to two buds. However, with strong-growing varieties like Concord, Niagara and Isabella, and under good soil con- ditions, the stem may be formed the second year. With moder- ate-growing varieties and under average conditions, the forma- tion of the stem is left until the third year. The straightest and best-matured cane is left for the purpose. This is carried to the lower wire and there firmly tied with willow. As soon -as the shoots have made sufficient growth they are loosely tied to the wires that they may be kept away from the tillage tools. The fourth year the head of the vine is formed. This should stand a few inches below the lower wire. Two canes grow- ing from the stem near this position are selected, one being tied to the right and the other to the left along the lower wire. In the Keuka Lake District, the canes are tied with willows. K 130 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING In addition, at least two spurs of two buds each are retained near the head. With Concord, the canes may carry about ten buds each, but with Catawba, as grown on the hillsides of the Central Lakes Region of New York, the canes should not carry above six buds each. As the shoots develop from the horizontal canes, they are tied with rye straw to the middle and upper wires. This summer tying is almost continuous after the shoots are long enough to reach the middle wire. “The following year all the wood is cut away except two or three canes that have developed from the basal buds of the canes put up the previous year, or that have grown from the spurs. In the event of a third cane being retained, it is tied along the middle wire. Spurs are again maintained close to the head for renewal purposes. The other two canes are tied along the lower wire as before. If the same spurs are used for a few years they become so long that the canes arising from them reach above the wire and cannot be well managed in the ‘ willow- ing.’ It is desirable to provide new spurs annually, selecting those canes for the purpose that arise from the head of the vine or near it. It is possible by careful pruning to so cut away the old wood that practically all that remains after each pruning is the stem. Thus the vine is renewed almost to the ground. When the stem approaches the end of its use- fulness, a shoot is allowed to grow from the ground, and the old one is cut away. Figure 17 shows a vine pruned by the Keuka method. “This method of training is especially well adapted to slow Fie. 17. Keuka method of training. TRAINING GRAPES IN EASTERN AMERICA 1381 growing varieties, or those situated on poor soils, where but little wood growth is made. It is ideally adapted for the growing of Catawba on the hillsides of Keuka Lake. It is well adapted to late-maturing varieties planted out of their zone. Concord, growing under average conditions, is too vigorous to be trained by this method. It makes a tremendous growth of wood out of all proportion to the quantity of fruit, which is inclined to be very inferior. The chief objection to this method is the amount of summer tying involved which comes at a time when attention to tillage should be given. It might prove profitable in the growing of dessert varieties that have been discarded because of lack of vigor. On thin hillside soils, Catawba requires training modelled after this method but on the heavier upland ones, with shorter pruning, it can be grown on the Chautauqua Arm plan. Delaware, Iona, Dutchess, Campbell, Eumelan, Jessica, Vergennes and Regal are, as a rule, grown to better advantage when trained by the High Renewal method.” Fan-training. The only other method now in use in which the shoots may be trained upright is that in which the canes are disposed of in fan-shape. This method was much used a generation ago but is rapidly becoming obsolete. In fan-training the renewals are made yearly from spurs near the ground, and the fruiting canes are carried up obliquely and so form a fan. The great advantage in fan-training is that a trunk is almost dispensed with, which greatly facilitates laying down the vine in winter where winter-protection is needed. There are several objec- tions to this method in commercial plantations. The chief one is that the spurs become long, crooked and almost un- manageable so that renewals from the root must be made frequently. Another is that the fruit is borne close to the ground and becomes soiled with mud in dashing rains. The vines, 132 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING also, are inconvenient in shape for tying. There are two or three modifications of fan-training which may be described as mongrel methods between this and the High Renewal and Horizontal Arm methods, none of which, however, is now in general favor. II. Shoots drooping Quite by accident, William Kniffin, a stone mason living at Clintondale, New York, in the Hudson River grape region, discovered that grapes of large size and handsome appearance could be grown on vines in which the canes were trained hori- zontally with the shoots drooping. He put his discovery in practice and from it have come the several methods of training grapes which bear his name. Kniffin’s discovery was made about 1850 and the merits of his methods spread so rapidly over eastern America that by the end of the century the various Kniffn methods were more generally used than any others. Grape-growers now agree that strong-growing vines like Con- cord, Niagara and Clinton are best trained to one or another of the Kniffin methods. There are several modifications of Kniffin’s method, three of which are now in common use, the most popular being the Single-stem, Four-cane Kniffin. The trellis for the three methods carries two wires, the lower placed at the height of three to three and a half feet and the upper from two to two and a half feet above it. To permit this height of wires, the posts must be from eight to eight and a half feet in length, and must be firmly set with the end posts well braced. Single-stem, Four-cane Kniffin. As practiced at the New York Agricultural Experiment Station, the vines are trained as follows: One trunk is carried to the top wire the third year after planting, or if the growth is not long enough at this time, it TRAINING GRAPES IN EASTERN AMERICA 1338 is carried to the lower wire and there tied. In this case, the following year a cane is extended to the top wire. This trunk is permanent. If the stem reaches the upper wire the third year, growers break out many of the developing shoots and allow only the strongest to grow, choosing those that arise close to the wires. The stem should be tied tightly to the top wire and somewhat loosely to the lower. If girdling re- sults at the top, it is not objectionable as the head of the vine should be below rather than above the wire. When the shoots are sufficiently hardened, those growing close- to the wires should be loosely tied to prevent injury during cultiva- tion. At the beginning of the fourth year, as shown in Fig. 18, the vine should consist of a stem extending from the ground to a point below thetop wire. From this, a all but two canes and Fia. 18. Single-stem, Four-cane Kniffin training. two spurs of two buds each have been cut away below each wire level. As growth is most vigorous at the top of the stem, four to six more buds are left on the upper than on the lower canes. - 9 ci eee 5.00 Puare XIX. — Iona (X32). a i) : MARKETING THE CROPS 249 Pama Ol per basket. — <6 2 # « wos. $5.00 Hammes003 . . . at oh s elt eee hee 1.50 iemee tor third year s-)2 02,56 18° 2a. 8 $95.85 Ni CCRCMPIERS yates), sles do ey he en oe EERO. OO Fourth Year Interest on value of viney ard @) $800 per acre. =. 2 . © ‘$18:00 TRIE ie Rel ar i oe Stine su er eee eS cae 2.50 TRyines %). SLA, (er CRMC Macs ee AL ie cee sae 2.90 Spraying and aroneells oe? 4.00 Cultivating, plowing, harrowing, hand- hocing and plowing back one furrow. . Smee eae 9.25 Trellis upkeep, driving pORts, tightening ° wires, We. ey ys 2.50 Pulling and poling out brush. . pehe ice EP ak 1.69 No. baskets sold @ .16 per basket 1000 view $160.00 Cost of baskets @ $20 per thousand . ... . 20.60 mickinmeaiaellper basket’, -.-, <2. 0. -. *. . 10.00 Pacman Ol per baskets. 2) 04 5 . .. . See ee one tre eh cs 3.00 Dutotor fourth year“. 2. . 2. 4 « « $83.84 Mrconicmneree? Sows se Se ee. se ee oe pLOOIOO Ontzonortour years). 6) = 2 « ). ar. = -t $245.44 JNCcOMeOmiouUrnyeans <=. 3. ./ ficken ee Ritex oes Soa) Eee. S| Barkly: Victoria roe ela. Fes ee ee Beacon’) Sect e eerse ic. ool are alleen 2 [Ma bON sy ciesce eed oer eee 4] coe Bae oN ey peaches ate ieee it ley le ie _ ol HCLIpPSOysc.5 \. areca Creel eae Cle olen’ Berckmansieeeee || ae coin bts 2 tas J <\ldorado. =. «se o< ae lees | | Black Hagle......|... Weal Blvitaien cn doe °F |) ele) |e | eae Brighton. 7-e Fees oe te elle yas) Emp Ite States are diene cae Fl aera eae Brrllisniteto ere seneal ens [Ra ees-cill 2 sce) Ertabieae ferences ested cee | # |e eare FS LQwitte een ee * Mumedelia< eee ous | ee ee bagel dais |\io Campbell Marly 22 3.20) Sole see (bumelance ae cee eee ered las Flee Ganadameiocs scion seoteel earl Bos 2 (4a jaar tece Soe al ee Edler We mn Canandaigua..... salseah * Is cele. liters Vim SOniycn 5) ||)henel eee eee * Gamma’ cece = oro Pees Va esl (cetera +) |Gaertners o- 2c oel ee es alee Gatawhbattan meee creed Se EAE alee F Gienevate < SE Se 3 eee cll (eae ci Champion. 2-5 a... Ae a fae | Stee 13 Goethe aan s senses toet eke Si en a es" Chautauqua...... eles alae elec Golds@oners o5 see (ies lee fo (eRe Vs @levener.)52202 3% FM | Ray eee 2. | Grem Golden as.2 |e | Slane ees @hingiont.. fees cei tapered er ee le SeeallaGurini(os tole eye a olla alloc 6 Eee ee Colerain. ee creas ox all EA enonal ete beste glatis-os aceenerckel te sealing ee alee Columbian Helen Keller? =. 5 =\||. 2 s|)22 ies eee ee Imperial fa. nciiee * Herbert: ac lel eee a Pel (artis Concord a2 anole ae Pree fel Pome meal llc (oye leit mt eee irae lgnca| iis ole 2 | eat eee Cottages a. alee Eee lh i tee ELC KS 4 te seen eel ance Cee bade ba tes 6 @revyeling<..2.. rales scavell, CROWS y lee, ee) eel eel gO bare se aere- a lentes |e bi Penal liber). Croton er ee on ete = Re PE os EE OSL ONG! o- eerarieie crcl eee Fl sc ieee Delavoets etn! te Sats Salo Comper sgt ob att era eee a ee * Delaware........ eo * isabelle. aur: a |(* olen ee Diamonds. ces ae elie heer * ....|Janesvalles = scinse £0] eae ee om MISCELLANIES 289 TasLe IV.—SnHowrne Bioominc TIME OF GRAPES — Continued | | Very EARLY EARLY MIpDSEASON Very LATE LCR. - Sas oe Lady Washington.|...]...|. indleyee es 22 < fe.|52 ane NEUECTE epee ohio Osco sasl ace Ae Missouri Riesling.|.. . Montefiore... .2.|... age INA UORGET PA ren ee aan ee as INTO Onto. Sheen ee Northern Muscadine.....]... MRE 9 Oe aes * xe 4 4 H- * y|(Peabody jon. sss Perfection... .-~.- - a|letediaiass wok ate66 ie MIPIOKCE. hens ee n\Pocklinetone =... Sen | tere ..|Poughkeepsie..... palietes ke _\Leetonising Cee oe oe eal ee all RG¥0 [0 acetone eee cae aac nome eee a\SECretany:. «<< sii: werd ete Pe SeNasGUAmerer aire. eel eesee tlt arena lien oe ../Stark-Star SFillGwcte| Sete Eh avs faim phys nae se PEAS SW Sterissey tes eae ie .|Wergennes.:.2..... ae eek .|Winchell b | fe] | a amen |S >» | A a | & Hi< > | * * ee eH HH KH: “xe He HH: | Mipseason * # EF H- a BR 4 ss > Bl) ss Sh |e S| = od be * * * * * RINGING GRAPE VINES The ringing of woody plants is a well-known horticultural practice. Three objects may be attained by ringing: unpro- ductive plants may be brought into bearing by ringing; the size of the fruits may be increased and thereby the plants be made more productive; and the maturity of the fruit may be hastened. In European countries, ringing has long been prac- ticed with all tree-fruits and the grape, but in America the operation is recommended only for the apple and the grape U 290 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING and with neither fruit is ringing widely practiced. Experiments carried on at the New York Agricultural Experiment Station by Paddock, as reported in Bulletin 151 from this Station, show that ringing may well be practiced by grape-growers under some conditions. Since Paddock’s experiments, and possibly to some extent before, the grape has been ringed to produce exhibition fruits or a fancy product for the market. Ringing consists in taking from the vine a layer of bark around the vine through the cortex and bast of the plant. The width of the wound varies from that of a simple cut made with a knife to a band of bark an inch in diameter. The operation is performed during that period of growth in which the bark peels most readily from the vine, the period of greatest cam- bial activity. The term “ringing” is preferred to “girdling,” a word sometimes used, since the latter properly designates a wound which extends into and usually kills the plant. The theory of ringing is simple. Unassimilated sap passes from the roots of the plant to the leaves through the outer layer of the woody cylinder. In the leaves this raw material is acted on by various agents, after which it is distributed to the several organs of the plant through vessels in the inner bark. When plants are ringed, the upward flow of sap is continued as before the operation, but the newly made food compounds can- not pass beyond the injury, and therefore the top of the plant is supplied with an extra amount of food at the expense of the parts below the ring. The extra food produces the results noted. It turns out in practice that ringing is usually harmful to the plant, as one might expect from so unnatural an operation. Injury to the plant arises from the fact that parts of the vine are starved at the expense of other parts; and because, when the bark is removed, the outer layers of the woody cylinder dry out very quickly and thus check to some extent the up- ward flow of sap through evaporation from the exposed wood. MISCELLANIES 291 Thus, not infrequently, the plant’s vitality is seriously drained. Nevertheless, vineyards may be found in which ringing has been extensively practiced many seasons in succession and which continue to yield profitable crops, the growers having learned to perform the work of ringing so as to injure the vines but little. Ringing without harm to the plant depends much on the way in which the vines have been pruned. For instance, if the vines are pruned to the two-arm Kniffin method, the ringing of bark should be done from both arms just beyond the fifth bud. Thus, the ten buds left on the vine produce enough leaf surface to supply the food necessary to keep the vine in vigorous condition. When the four-arm Kniffin method is used, the two top arms only are ringed, and even so three or four buds must be left on each for renewals. Whatever the method of training, it will be seen frdm these examples that some unringed wood must be left to the vine with which to supply leafy shoots to support the vine. Some growers ring their vines only every other year, thus giving them an oppor- tunity to recover from whatever loss of vigor they may have sustained in the season of ringing. Several other considerations are important in ringing: First, the vines must not be permitted to carry too large a crop. Again, the amount of fruit on the ringed portion of the vine must depend on the amount of leaf surface not only of the plant but of the ringed arms, each ringed arm acting somewhat independently so far as its crop is concerned. If too many clusters are left on the ringed arms, it always follows that the fruit is inferior and often worthless. Lastly, all fruit be- tween the rings and the trunk must be removed, for it does not mature properly and so adds only to the drain on the plant’s vitality. As to the results, it is certain from the experiments that have been conducted and from the experience of grape-growers, that 292 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING the maturity of the fruit is hastened, and berries and bunches are larger when the ringing has been done intelligently. Many growers hold that fruit produced on ringed vines is never quite up to the mark in quality and in firmness of fruit. There seems to be a difference in opinion about this falling off in quality, however, although unquestionably, choice sorts, as Delaware, Iona and Dutchess, suffer more or less in quality. It is commonly agreed, also, that varieties, the fruits of which crack badly, as the Worden, suffer more from ¥ cracking on ringed than on unringed vines. Experiment and experience prove that the best results of ringing are obtained if the work is done when the grapes are about one-third grown. Of course the exact time de- pends on the season and on Fie. 52. Tools used in ringing - : grape-vines are shown in 1 and 2; while the variety. The operation 3 and 4 show ringed vines at the be- jg variously performed and is ginning and the close of the season. easily done with a sharp knife, but when large vineyards are to be ringed the grower ought to provide himself with some simple tool. Paddock, in the bulle- tin previously mentioned, pictures two of these tools and these are reproduced in Fig. 52. In conclusion it must be said that it is doubtful whether the gains attained by ringing offset the losses. The practice is chiefly of value only when exhibition clusters of grapes are wanted or when it is necessary to hasten the maturity of the crop. Always, however, the work must be_per- formed with intelligence and judgment or the losses will offset the gains. MISCELLANIES 293 BAGGING GRAPES In some localities bagging is considered an essential to profit- able grape-growing. The bags serve to protect the grapes against birds. In some grape regions vineyards suffer more from the depredations of robins and other birds than from all other troubles. Grapes bearing small berries and having tender pulp and those which shell most readily from the stem suffer most. Of standard sorts, Delaware is probably more enticing to robins than any other variety. There is only one way of preventing damage to grapes from birds and that is by bagging the clusters. Bagging is also an effective means of protecting the grape from several fungi and insects. In home plantations or small commercial vineyards, bagging the bunches often eliminates the necessity of spraying for fungi and for most of the insects that trouble the grape. Because of the warmth afforded by the bags, bagged grapes ripen a little earlier and are of somewhat higher quality than those not bagged. Grapes bagged are pro- tected from early frost, thus prolonging the season. Grapes that have been protected from the elements during the summer are more attractive than those exposed to the weather, since the fruits are free from weather marks and present a fresh, bright appearance, which puts them in a grade above unbagged grapes. Bagging often enables the grower to sell his crop as a faney product. Grapes are bagged as soon as the fruits are well set, the sooner the better if protection against fungi is one of the pur- poses. Under no circumstances, however, should the clusters be bagged while in blossom. A patent bag made for the pur- pose may be purchased or, serving equally well, the common one and one-half and two-pound manila bags used by grocers prove satisfactory. One of the patent bags which is known as the Ideal Clasp Bag has a metal clasp attached to the top for 294 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING securing the bag in place over the cluster. In using the grocer’s bag, before it is put in place the corners of both the top and bottom are cut off by placing several bags on a firm level surface and using a broad-shaped chisel. Cutting off the corners of the top enables the operator to close the bag neatly over the cluster, while cutting off the corners of the bottom fur- nishes a means of escape for any water that gets in the bag. In putting the bag in place, the top is pinned above the lateral from which the bunch hangs, and must not be fastened about the small stem of the cluster, as the wind blowing the bag al- most invariably breaks the cluster from the vine. The largest pins to be purchased in dry-goods stores are used in pinning the bags. The bags remain until the grapes are picked. Wet weather does not injure bags and seemingly they grow stronger with exposure to sun and wind. The cost of the bags and the work of putting them on is no small item. To secure the best results, the work must be done at the period between the dropping of the blossoms and the formation of the seeds, when the grapes are about the size of a small pea. This is a busy time for the grape-grower, which adds to the cost. When the work is conducted on a large scale, the cost is about two dollars a thousand bags, this figure covering both the cost of bags and labor. Women do the work more expeditiously than men and soon become very skillful in putting on the bags. Despite the trouble and cost of bagging, growers seeking to produce a fancy product find that the ex- penditure proves profitable. WINTER-PROTECTION OF GRAPES With a little care as to winter-protection, grapes may be grown profitably in northern regions where, without protection, the vines are killed or injured by low temperatures. Indeed, it is little short of amazing how well grapes can be grown in north- MISCELLANIES 295 ern regions where nature wears a most austere countenance in winter, if hardy early sorts are planted in warm soils and situ- ations, and the vines are covered in the winter. Occasionally one finds grapes grown profitably in commercial vineyards in the northern states in regions where protection must be given to prevent winter-killing, the extra work of giving protection being more than offset by the high price received in local markets for the fruit. In all locations in which winter-protection must be given, several other precautions are helpful or even necessary. ‘Thus, cultivation must cease early in the season, and a cover-crop be sown to help harden and mature the vines. The grapes, also, must not be planted in soils rich in nitrogen, and nitrogenous fertilizers must be applied with care. The pruning should be such as does not induce great growth. These simple precau- tions to hasten maturity often suffice in climates where the danger of winter-killing is but slight, but where danger is imminent the vines must be covered either by wrapping or by laying down. Wrapping with straw may suffice for a few vines, but when many vines are to be protected, laying them down is cheaper and much more effectual. By laying down is meant that the vines must be placed on the ground and there be protected by earth and snow or other covering. It is obvious that to protect thus, the vines must receive special training; otherwise the trunks may be too stiff for bending. Some method of training must be chosen in which renewals may be made rather frequently from the ground so that if the trunks become large, clumsy and unpliable, a more manageable trunk can be trained. If the provisions for re- newal are kept in mind, any one of the several methods of training grapes explained in Chapter VIII on training may be used. Laying down must be preceded by pruning, after which the arms and trunk are loosened from the wires and bent to the 296 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING ground. Bending is facilitated by removing a spade full of earth from the side of the vine in the direction in which the vine is to be bent. The trunk is then laid on the earth and sufficient soil placed on it to keep it in place on the ground. If the danger of winter-killing is great because of the tenderness of the variety or the austerity of the climate, it often becomes necessary to cover the whole plant lightly with earth. Small growers often make use of coarse manure, straw, corn-stalks or similar covering, in which case the vines are held on the ground by fence-rails or other timbers; but protecting with material that must be brought into the vineyard is expensive and not more satisfactory than earth. The vines can be put down at any time after the leaves drop and before the earth begins to freeze. It is more important that the vines be taken up at the proper time in the spring. If un- covered too early and cold weather follows, injury may result and more harm be done than if the vines had not been covered. On the other hand, if the earth is permitted to remain too long, foliage and vine are tender both to sunshine and frost. A grape- grower in New York who has had much experience in laying down vines in a vineyard of some thirty or forty acres says that the work may be done at a cost of $6 an acre at the average wage paid for farm-labor. It must be expected in a large plantation, no matter how well the work of covering is done, that occasionally a trunk will be broken, making it neces- sary to graft the vine if a shoot does not spring up from below the break. Ripening DaTES AND LENGTH OF SEASON FOR GRAPES Every grape-grower should know when his varieties may be expected to ripen and the length of season that they will keep. The commercial fruit-grower by all means should have this information. It is not sufficient that he know only roughly MISCELLANIES 297 at what season his varieties ripen; for, to take the turn of the market, he must know exactly when a variety will ripen and how long it will keep. He needs this information, also, that he may distribute his labor better throughout the picking season. Unfortunately, the data as to ripening time given by origi- nators and introducers of varieties are not always reliable. This untrustworthiness of data is readily accounted for in several ways: First, growers do not generally agree as to when grapes are ripe nor as to how long they are fit to eat. Again, much confusion as to when varieties ripen and how long they will keep arises from the fact that grapes ripen at different times in different places, and it is difficult for the grape-grower in Maine to make allowance in season for varieties, the time of ripening of which is given for Maryland. There are also other causes than the seasonal differences in grape regions for variability in ripening time; thus, some soils are warmer and quicker than others, and on these grapes ripen earlier. Appli- cation of nitrogenous fertilizers may delay the period of ripen- ing somewhat. Grapes ripen perceptibly earlier on old plants than on young ones. Lastly, every vineyard in a particular region has its own particular climate caused by the lay of land, nearness to water, air currents and altitude which cause small differences in ripening. The following table taken from Bulletin No. 408 of the New York Agricultural Experiment Station gives the ripening dates of grapes at Geneva, New York. It is necessary that the reader know something about the conditions affecting the ripening time at Geneva. The latitude is 42° 50’ 46’... The altitude is 525 feet above sea level. The vineyard lies a mile west of a rela- tively large body of water. The soil is a cold heavy clay which must delay ripening time somewhat. The land is level. The data are given as an average for three seasons, 1913-1915. The figures given for “weeks in common storage” cover a variable number of years, but for all varieties three or more 298 years. MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING The grapes, after being picked, were at once placed in common storage in a room on the second floor of a building. There conditions were not ideal, and no doubt the season of storage would have been prolonged somewhat had the fruit been kept in a better storage-room. TABLE V.—SHOWING THE RIPENING TIME OF GRAPES » » dey a itian| on Peele a | ele ae BIR el elal ele aoe) elel al & eS ae ees ven bneh Ibet || | = Boon el pay et Nierelt | Bon|>l|ala]4 IN EINE + oll, sae ee -| * MPOSEHN sy 17 a. PMSA bolls Go. a0 cean Poe .|Downing...|. * Barhy:. eee 28 * .|Dracut Beacon. iG Se alls Amber... 9 Eli Wawra leet. &. 3 Belle sent ee 8 a tae Dutchess 4)" e220 enleee * Berckmans.| 21 * 72 |(Barlya@ bios eS Cree |e Black Eagle| 18 * .| Early Brighton...| 20 * ; Vietore .|) ek Edie Eee (eee nes | as Brilliant...) 11 * SHILDERKOeS a rae tome ee cr Blown eee 6 * .|Eclipse.... Ze Gate Baa. ua Campbell Eldorado ..| 17 soy hese | A Harlye.o| 2 Maa UE el fy or fae Elvira..... 18 * Garisig sien |b hcl eal eee ee * .|Empire Canandai- States. l|als|4 Hudaleo....| 12 FSi aio ol NUCL ilin o eens 10 * Hosford.... 6 * .|Northern onaho. 2s : is} * Musca- Isabella....} 11 * Gines..:«; 9 * Janesville. .| 13 * ...|Norton. 7 ae: Jefferson...}| 18 Ber * |Oporto 12 Bolt a Jessies. . =... - 12 * 5 OvArIAe. 5 oo 11 * Jewel...... 12 * ae a||Reabodyaree lines 2 Bea |e Kensington | 19 ae * .|Perfection . 8 rail tg LEGTavE OES |e ee * letras. 44, with few small warts; brush short, wine-colored. Berries small, oblate, black, glossy with thick bloom, persistent, firm; skin thin, tender with very dark wine-colored pigment; flesh green with reddis'1 tinge, translucent, juicy, fine-grained, tender, spicy, tart; fair in quality. Seeds free, one to five, small, short, ight brown. IDEAL (Labrusea, Vinifera, Bourquiniana) Ideal is a handsome seedling of Delaware, from which it dif- fers chiefly in being larger in bunch and berry, attaining in both of these characters nearly the size of Catawba. In Kansas and Missouri, this variety is highly recommended, not only for the high quality of the fruit, ranking with Delaware in quality, but because of vigorous, healthy, productive vines. But farther north the vines are precariously hardy and not sufficiently fruit- ful, healthy nor vigorous to warrant high recommendation. Ideal originated with John Burr, Leavenworth, Kansas, from seed of Delaware, about 1885. Vine vigorous, doubtfully hardy, productive; tendrils intermittent, bifid or trifid. Canes long, numerous, slender, dark brown; nodes enlarged, flattened; internodes long. Leaves large, variable in color ; lobes three to five; petiolar sinus deep, wide; teeth deep, narrow ; upper surface light green, dull; lower surface pale green, pubescent. Fruit early mid-season, keeps well. Clusters large, broad, heavily shouldered; pedicel thick; brush green. Berries large, round, dark 390 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING red with thin bloom, usually persistent, firm; skin thick, tough, adherent; flesh green, tender, aromatic, sweet next the skin, acid at the center; good to very good. Seeds adherent, large, plump, brown. IoNA (Labrusea, Vinifera) In flavor, the fruit of Iona (Plate XIX) has a rare combina- tion of sweetness and acidity, pure, delicate and vinous. The flesh is transparent, melting, tender, juicy and of uniform con- sistency quite to the center. The seeds are few and small and part readily from the flesh. The color is a peculiar dark-red wine with a tint of amethyst, variable and not always attrac- tive. The bunch is large but loose, with berries varying in size and ripening unevenly. The fruit may be kept until late winter. The vine characters of Iona are not as good as those of the fruit. To do well, the vine must have a soil exactly suited to its wants, seemingly thriving best in deep, dry, sandy or gravelly clays. Iona responds especially well when trained against walls or buildings, attaining under such conditions rare perfection. The vines are doubtfully hardy and in many parts of the North must have winter protection; they are not vigorous and are in- clined to overbear, to remedy which they must have close prun- ing. In localities in which mildew and rot thrive, the variety is badly attacked by these diseases. Iona originated with C. W. Grant, Iona Island, New York, from seed of Diana planted in 1885. Vine weak, doubtfully hardy, unproductive. Canes short, light brown; nodes enlarged; internodes short; tendrils intermittent, bifid. Leaves thick; upper surface light green, dull, smooth; lower surface grayish-green, heavily pubescent; lobes three to five with terminal one acute; petiolar sinus of medium depth and width; basal sinus shallow; lateral sinus shallow, wide; teeth shallow. Flowers self-fertile, open late; stamens upright. Fruit late, keeps well. Clusters medium in size, sometimes double- shouldered, slender, tapering, loose; brush pale green. Berries uni- PutateE XXIX.— Vergennes (X 2). ws A a i My) ‘ * ota its Post oh oe “y : yma ‘ee Me LY oy VARIETIES OF GRAPES 391 form, oval, round, dull, light and dark red with thin bloom, persistent, firm; skin tough, adherent, slightly astringent; flesh green, trans- lucent, juicy, fine-grained, tender, melting, vinous; very good. Seeds free, one to four, small, broad, plump, brown. ISABELLA (Labrusea, Vinifera) Alexander, Black Cape, Christie’s Improved Isabella, Conck- ling’s Wilding, Constantia, Dorchester, Gibb’s Grape, Hensell’s Long Island, Payne’s Early, Helene, Woodward Isabella (Plate XX) is now of little more than historical inter- est, it having been one of the mainstays of American viticulture. In appearance, the fruit of Isabella is fully as attractive as that of any black grape, the clusters being large and well formed and the berries glossy black with thick bloom. The flavor is good, but the thick skin and muskiness in taste are objectionable. The grapes keep and ship well. Isabella is surpassed in vine char- acters by many other kinds, notably Concord, which has taken its place. The lustrous green, ample foliage which remains late in the season, and the vigor of the vine, make this variety an attractive ornamental, well adapted for growing on arbors, porches and. trellises. The origin of Isabella is not known. It was obtained by William Prince, Flushing, Long Island, about 1816 from Mrs. Isabella Gibbs, Brooklyn, New York. Vine vigorous, hardy, productive. Canes short, numerous with heavy pubescence, thick, light brown; nodes enlarged, flattened; in- ternodes short; tendrils continuous, long, bifid or trifid. Leaves thick; upper surface dark green, smooth, glossy; lower surface whitish-green, heavily pubescent; lobes three when present with terminal lobe obtuse; petiolar sinus shallow, narrow, often closed, overlapping; basal sinus usually wanting; lateral sinus shallow, narrow, frequently notched ; teeth shallow, wide. Flowers self-fertile, open in mid-season; stamens upright. Fruit late, keeps and ships well. Clusters large, cylindrical, frequently single-shouldered; pedicel slender, smooth; brush long, 392 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING yellowish-green. Berries medium to large, oval, black with heavy bloom, persistent, soft; skin thick, tough, adherent, astringent; flesh pale green, translucent, juicy, fine-grained, tender, meaty, some foxi- ness, sweet; good. Seeds one to three, large, broad, distinctly notched, short, brown with yellow tips. ISABELLA SEEDLING (Labrusea, Vinifera) Isabella Seedling is an early, vigorous, productive offspring of Isabella. In fruit characters it greatly resembles its parent, but ripens its crop earlier and has a more compact bunch. Like that of its parent, the fruit is of good quality and keeps remarkably well. This seedling is now grown more than Isa- bella and, while not of any considerable commercial importance, is far more deserving attention as a market grape than some of the poorly flavored kinds more generally grown. There are several varieties under this name. Two are mentioned by Warder; one of Ohio and one of New York origin. The Isabella Seedling here described originated with G. A. Ensen- berger, Bloomington, Illinois, in 1889. Vine vigorous, healthy, hardy, productive. Canes long, thick, dark brown, often with a red tinge, with thin bloom; nodes prominent, flattened ; internodes long; tendrils intermittent or continuous, bifid. Leaves healthy, large, thick; upper surface green, dull; lower surface pale green or grayish-green, occasionally with a tinge of bronze, pubescent. Flowers self-fertile; stamens upright. Fruit early, keeps well. Clusters large, long, slender, cylindrical, usually single-shouldered, loose, compact. Berries large, oval, often pear-shaped, dull black with thick bloom, persistent, soft; skin thick with some red pigment; flesh pale green, juicy, tender, coarse, vinous ; good. Seeds numerous, free, large, broad, notched, dark brown. ISRAELLA (Labrusea, Vinifera) Tsraella came from C. W. Grant contemporaneously with Tona and was heralded as the earliest good grape in cultivation. VARIETIES OF GRAPES 393 For several years after its introduction, it was widely tried but was almost everywhere discarded because of the poor quality and unattractive appearance of the fruit and Jack of vigor, hardiness and productiveness in the vine. Grant grew Israella from seed of Isabella planted in 1885. Vine lacking in vigor, unproductive. Canes slender, dark brown; nodes enlarged, flattened; internodes short; tendrils continuous, bifid. Leaves large; upper surface light green, dull, rugose; lower surface pale green, pubescent; lobes one to five, faint; petiolar sinus deep, narrow; teeth shallow, sharp; stamens upright. Fruit late, keeps well. Clusters large, of medium length and breadth, tapering, often single-shouldered, compact, frequently with many abortive fruits. Berries of medium size, round-oval, black or purplish-black with thin bloom, inclined to drop, soft; skin thick, tough with a large amount of purplish-red pigment; flesh pale green, juicy, stringy, mild, sweet from skin to center; fair in quality. Seeds free, medium in size, notched, blunt, light brown, often covered with grayish warts. IvEs (Labrusea, Aistivalis) Ives’ Madeira, Ives’ Seedling, Kittredge Ives has a high reputation as a grape for making red wine, being surpassed only by Norton for this purpose. The vine is hardy, healthy, vigorous and fruitful. The fruit is poor in quality, colors long before ripe, has a foxy odor, and the flesh is tough and pulpy. The bunches are compact, with well- formed, jet-black grapes, which make them attractive. The vine is easily propagated and is adapted to any good grape soil, but is so rampant in growth that it is difficult to manage. The variety is not widely cultivated. Ives was grown by Henry Ives from seed planted in 1840 in his garden in Cincinnati, Ohio. Vine vigorous, hardy, healthy, productive. Canes long, thick, reddish-brown with thin bloom; nodes enlarged, flattened ; internodes short; tendrils continuous, bifid or trifid. Leaves large; upper 394 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING surface dark green, dull, rugose; lower surface pale green, pubescent ; lobes three to five when present with terminal one acute; petiolar sinus deep, narrow, sometimes closed and overlapping; basal sinus shallow ; lateral sinus narrow; teeth shallow. Fruit late mid-season, keeps well. Clusters large, tapering, fre- quently single-shouldered, compact, often with numerous abortive berries; pedicel slender with numerous small warts; brush short, slender, pale with a reddish-brown tinge. Berries oval, jet-black with heavy bloom, very persistent, firm; skin tough, adherent, wine- colored pigment, astringent; flesh pale green, translucent, juicy, fine- grained, tough, foxy; good. Seeds adherent, one to four, small, often abortive, broad, short, blunt, plump, brown. JAMES (Rotundifolia) James is one of the largest of the Rotundifolia grapes and probably the best general-purpose variety of this species. The vine is noted for vigor and productiveness. It cannot be grown north of Maryland. It thrives in sandy loam soils with clay subsoil. The variety was found by B. W. M. James, Pitt County, North Carolina. It was introduced about 1890 and was placed on the grape list of the American Pomological Society fruit catalog in 1899. Vine vigorous, healthy, productive. Canes slender, numerous, long, slightly trailing. Leaves of medium size, thick, smooth, leathery, cordate, as broad as long, with a serrate margin. Flowers open late; stamens reflexed. Fruit ripens late, hangs on the vine for three weeks, keeps well. Clusters small, containing from four to twelve berries, irregular, loose. Berries large, three-fourths to one and one-fourth inches in diameter, round, blue-black, marked with specks; skin thick, tough. Pulp juicy, sweet; good in quality. J ANESVILLE (Labrusea, Vulpina) Endowed with a constitution enabling it to withstand cold to which most other grapes succumb, Janesville has made a VARIETIES OF GRAPES 395 place for itself in far northern localities. Moreover, the grapes ripen early, being about the first to color although they are not ripe until some time after coloring. The vine also is healthy, vigorous and productive. The fruit, however, is worthless when better sorts can be grown. The clusters and berries are small, the grapes are pulpy, tough, seedy, have a thick skin and a disagreeable acid taste. Janesville was grown by F. W. Loudon, Janesville, Wisconsin, from chance seed planted in 1858. Vine vigorous, hardy, healthy, productive. Canes spiny, numerous, dark brown; nodes flattened; internodes long; tendrils intermittent or continuous, long, bifid or trifid. Leaves small, thin; upper sur- face glossy, smooth; lower surface pale green, lightly pubescent; leaf usually not lobed with terminus acute; petiolar sinus narrow, often closed and overlapping; basal and lateral sinuses lacking ; teeth shal- low. Flowers self-fertile, open very early ; stamens upright. Fruit early, keeps well. Clusters small, short, cylindrical, usually single-shouldered, compact; pedicel short, slender, covered with small, scattering warts; brush dark wine color. Berries round, dull black with heavy bloom, persistent, firm; skin thick, tough, adherent with dark wine-colored pigment, astringent; flesh pale reddish-green, translucent, juicy, tough, coarse, vinous, acid; fair in quality. Seeds adherent, one to six, large, broad, angular, blunt, dark brown. JEFFERSON (Labrusea, Vinifera) Jefferson (Plate X XI) is an offspring of Concord crossed with Iona, and resembles Concord in vigor, productiveness and healthiness of vine, and Jona in color and quality of fruit. The vine producesits fruit two weeks later than Concord and is not as hardy, faults that debar it from taking high rank as a commer- cial grape. Fortunately the vines yield readily to laying down for winter protection so that even in commercial plantations it is not difficult to prevent winter injury. The bunches of Jefferson are large, well-formed, compact with berries of uniform size and color. The flesh is firm yet tender, juicy with a rich, vinous flavor and a delicate aroma which persists even after the ber- 396 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING ries have dried into raisins. The fruit ships and keeps well, the berries adhering to the cluster and the fruit retaining its freshness into late winter. Jefferson is widely distributed and is well known by viticulturists in eastern America. It is not particular as to localities, if the season be long and the climate temperate, and thrives in all soils. The variety originated with J. H. Ricketts, Newburgh, New York; it fruited first in 1874. Vine vigorous, healthy, doubtfully hardy, productive. Canes short, numerous, light to dark brown; nodes enlarged, round; inter- nodes short; tendrils intermittent, short, bifid or trifid. Leaves healthy ; upper surface light green, older leaves rugose; lower surface pale green, strongly pubescent; leaf usually not lobed with terminus acute; petiolar sinus narrow, sometimes closed and overlapping; basal sinus usually absent; lateral sinus shallow, often a mere notch; teeth regular, shallow. Flowers self-fertile, open late; stamens upright. Fruit late, keeps and ships well. Clusters large, cylindrical, usually single-shouldered, sometimes double-shouldered, compact; pedicel short, slender with a few inconspicuous warts; brush long, slender, pale yellowish-green. Berries medium in size, oval, light and dark red, glossy with thin bloom, persistent, very firm; skin thick, tough, free, slightly astringent ; flesh light green, translucent, juicy, coarse-grained, tender, vinous; good to best. Seeds free, one to four, broad, short, blunt, plump, brown. JESSICA (Labrusea, Vinifera) Jessica is an early, hardy, green grape. The fruit is sweet, rich, sprightly and almost free from foxiness, but is unattrac- tive and does not keep well. The clusters and berries are small, and the clusters are too loose for a good grape. Jessica may be commended for earliness and hardiness and is, there- fore, desirable, if at all, in northern regions. William H. Read, Port Dalhousie, Ontario, grew Jessica from seed planted some time between 1870 and 1880. Vine medium in vigor, healthy, hardy, productive. Canes long, thick, dark brown with red tinge; nodes enlarged, flattened; inter- VARIETIES OF GRAPES 397 nodes short; tendrils continuous or intermittent, bifid or trifid. Leaves small; upper surface dark green, glossy, often rugose; lower surface pale green, very pubescent; lobes three; petiolar sinus narrow ; teeth shallow, narrow. Flowers self-fertile, open in mid-season ; stamens upright. Fruit very early. Clusters small, slender, tapering, usually single- shouldered. Berries small, round, light green, often tinged with yellow, covered with thin bloom, persistent, soft; skin thin, adherent, faintly astringent; flesh pale green, transparent, juicy, tender, soft, sprightly, sweet; good. Seeds adherent, medium to broad, notched, brown. JEWEL (Labrusea, Bourquiniana, Vinifera) The notable characters of Jewel are earliness and high quality in fruit; although, as compared with Delaware, its parent, the vine is vigorous, healthy and hardy. In form and size of bunch and berry, Jewel closely resembles Delaware, but the grapes are deep black in color. The flesh characters and flavor of the fruit are much like those of Delaware, the pulp being tender - yet firm, and the flavor having the same rich, sprightly, vinous taste found in the parent. The seeds are few and small. The skin is thin but tough, and the grapes ship well, keep long, do not shell, and although early, hang until frost. Jewel is a most excellent grape, worthy the place among black grapes that Delaware has among red varieties. In particular, it is recom- mended for earliness and for localities in the North where standard varieties do not ripen. John Burr, Leavenworth, Kansas, grew Jewel from seed of Delaware planted about 1874. Vine vigorous, healthy, hardy, productive. Canes slender, light reddish-brown; nodes enlarged, flattened; internodes short; tendrils continuous, bifid. Leaves secant, thick; upper surface light green, dull, rugose; lower surface tinged with bronze, heavily pubescent; lobes three when present with terminus acute; petiolar sinus narrow; basal sinus usually lacking; lateral sinus shallow, wide; teeth shallow. Flowers self-sterile, open in mid-season; stamens reflexed. Fruit early. Clusters small, slender, cylindrical, single-shouldered, compact; pedicel short, slender; brush short, wine-colored. Berries 398 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING medium in size, round, dark purplish-black, dull with heavy bloom, persistent, firm; skin thin, tough, adherent, wine-colored pigment ; flesh pale green, translucent, juicy, fine-grained, tender, sprightly, vinous, sweet; very good. Seeds adherent, one to four, frequently one-sided, blunt, light brown. KENSINGTON (Vinifera, Vulpina) Kensington has several very meritorious fruit and vine characters. ‘The vine resembles that of Clinton, its Vulpina parent, in vigor, hardiness, growth and productiveness, but the fruit has many of the characters of the European parent, Buckland Sweetwater. The grapes are yellowish-green, large, oval and borne in loose clusters of medium size. In quality the fruit of Kensington is not equal to that of Buckland Sweet- water but is much better than that of Clinton. The flesh is tender and juicy with a rich, sweet, vinous flavor. The hardi- ness of the vine and the high quality of the fruit should make Kensington a favorite green grape in northern gardens. This variety was grown by William Saunders, London, Ontario. It was sent out some time between 1870 and 1880. Vine vigorous, hardy, productive. Canes long, slender, light brown; nodes enlarged, flattened; internodes short; tendrils persist- ent, intermittent or continuous, long, bifid or trifid. Leaves thin; upper surface light green, glossy, smooth; lower surface pale green, pubescent, hairy; lobes wanting or one to three with terminus obtuse; petiolar sinus narrow; basal sinus shallow when present; lateral sinus shallow, usually a notch; teeth deep and wide. Flowers self-fertile, open early, stamens upright. Fruit mid-season. Clusters large, cylindrical, often heavily single- shouldered, loose, frequently with many undeveloped berries; pedicel long and slender with small, inconspicuous warts; brush short, pale green. Berries variable in size, oval, yellowish-green, glossy with thin bloom, persistent, firm; skin thin, tough, adherent, faintly as- tringent; flesh green, transparent, juicy, tender, vinous, sweet; good. Seeds free, two to four, wrinkled, large, long, broad, sharp-pointed, yellowish-brown. VARIETIES OF GRAPES 399 KING (Labrusea) King is similar to Concord, compared with which the vine is more vigorous and prolific, time of ripening and length of season the same, the clusters are one-fourth larger, the grapes are more persistent, the pulp is more tender, the flavor nearly the same but more sprightly, the seeds fewer in number, the wood harder and of shorter joints and the pedicels larger. King was found in the Concord vineyard of W. K. Munson, Grand Rapids, Michigan, in 1892. The vine was set for Concord and is sup- posed to be a bud-sport of that variety. Vine very vigorous, hardy, productive. Canes large, dark reddish- brown; nodes enlarged, slightly flattened; internodes short; tendrils continuous or intermittent, trifid or bifid. Leaves unusually large, thick ; upper surface green, dull; lower surface grayish-white changing to slight bronze, pubescent; lobes three when present, terminal one acute; teeth shallow, narrow. Flowers self-fertile, open in mid- season; stamens upright. Fruit mid-season, keeps well. Clusters large, long, broad, irregu- larly tapering, usually single-shouldered, compact. Berries large, round, black with thin bloom, persistent, firm; skin thick, tough, ad- herent, astringent; flesh pale green, very juicy, tough, stringy and with some foxiness; good. Seeds adherent, few, large, short, broad, lightly notched if at all, blunt, plump, light brown. Lapy (Labrusea, Vinifera) The vine of Lady is much like that of Concord, its parent, although not quite so vigorous nor productive, but ripens its fruit fully two weeks earlier. The fruit is much superior to that of Concord in quality, being richer, sweeter and less foxy. The grapes hang on the vines well but deteriorate rapidly after picking. The term, “ironclad,” used by grape-growers to express hardiness and freedom from disease, is probably as applicable to Lady as to any other of the Labrusca grapes. 400 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING The foliage is dense and of a deep glossy green, neither scald- ing under a hot sun nor freezing until heavy frosts, making it an attractive ornament in the garden. Lady is deservedly popular as a grape for the amateur and should be planted for nearby markets. It succeeds wherever Concord is grown, and because of its early ripening is especially adapted to northern latitudes where Concord does not always mature. Although the fruit ripens early, the buds start late, often escaping late spring frosts. When Lady was first heard of, it was in the hands of a Mr. Imlay, Muskingum County, Ohio. George W. Campbell, Delaware, Ohio, introduced it in 1874. Vine vigorous, hardy, medium in productiveness, healthy. Canes short, slender, dark reddish-brown ; nodes flattened ; internodes short ; tendrils intermittent, bifid or trifid. Leaves medium in size; upper surface light green, glossy, rugose; lower surface pale green, pubes- cent; lobes one to five with terminal one acuminate; petiolar sinus shallow, wide; lateral sinus variable in depth and width; teeth shallow. Flowers self-fertile, open in mid-season; stamens upright. Fruit early, does not keep well. Clusters small, short, slender, cylindrical, sometimes single-shouldered, compact; pedicel thick, smooth; brush slender, long, greenish-white. Berries large, round, light green, often with a tinge of yellow, glossy with thin bloom, persistent, firm; skin covered with small, scattering, dark dots, thin, tender, adherent, astringent; flesh greenish-white, translucent, juicy, tender, aromatic; very good. Seeds free, few, broad, light brown. Lapy WASHINGTON (Labrusea, Vinifera) Lady Washington is in many respects a most excellent grape but falls short in quality and does not excel in vine char- acters. The grapes make a good appearance, keep and ship well and are tender, juicy and sweet. The vines are luxuriant, hardy, for a grape with Vinifera blood, and healthy although slightly susceptible to mildew. As an exhibition grape, few green varieties show better when grown with care than Lady Washington. In the West and Southwest, the variety is said Puare XXX.— Winchell (X 3). i Sar ee Te VARIETIES OF GRAPES 401 to succeed better than any other Concord seedling. Lady Washington is another of J. H. Ricketts’ fine seedlings, this variety having come from seed of Concord fertilized by Allen’s Hybrid. It was introduced in 1878. Vine vigorous, productive. Canes long, few, thick, dark brown; nodes greatly enlarged, variable in shape; internodes long; tendrils eontinuous, long, bifid or trifid. Leaves large, thick; upper surface dark green, older leaves strongly rugose, glossy; lower surface pale green, pubescent; leaf entire with terminal acute; petiolar sinus deep, narrow, frequently closed and overlapping; basal sinus usually want- ing; lateral sinus shallow; teeth shallow, narrow. Flowers self- fertile, open in mid-season; stamens upright. Fruit late mid-season, keeps and ships well. Clusters large, broad, irregularly cylindrical, single-shouldered, frequently double-shouldered, loose; pedicel short with numerous conspicuous warts; brush very short, greenish. Berries variable in size, round-oblate, yellow-amber, glossy with thin bloom, persistent; skin thin, tender, adherent; flesh pale green, transparent, juicy and tender, stringy, aromatic, sweet; very good. Seeds free, one to four, broad, brown. LENOIR (Bourquiniana) Alabama, Black El Paso, Black July, Black Spanish, Blue French, Burgundy, Cigar Box Grape, Devereaux, Jack, Jacques, July Sherry, Longworth’s Ohio, MacCandless, Ohio, Springstein, Warren Lenoir is a tender southern grape which has been used largely in France and California as a resistant stock and a direct producer. The fruit is highly valued for its dark red wine and is very good for table use. The vine is very resistant to phyl- loxera and withstands drouth well. The origin of Lenoir is unknown. It was in cultivation in the South as long ago as the early part of the last century. Nicholas Herbemont states in 1829 that its name was given from a man named Lenoir who cultivated it near Stateburg, South Carolina. 2D 402 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING Vine vigorous, thrifty, semi-hardy, productive. Canes numerous, with some bloom at the nodes; tendrils intermittent. Leaves from two to seven-lobed, usually five, with characteristic bluish-green color above and pale green below. Clusters variable, medium to very large, tapering, usually shoul- dered. Berries small, round, dark bluish-purple, nearly black with lilae bloom; skin thick, tough; flesh juicy, tender, sweet, very rich in coloring matter. LigNan BLANC (Vinifera) White July, Lughenga, Joannene At Geneva, New York, Lignan Blane ripens first of all grapes, native or European. It is not of highest quality but is better than any other early grape and makes a valuable addition to the home vineyard. It is a favorite grape in Europe and is rather commonly grown in California. This variety offers excellent material for hybridization with native grapes. Vine vigorous, medium productive; buds open early; opening leaves light green, glossy, tinged with red along the edges, thinly pubescent. Leaves medium in size, roundish, somewhat dull green, slightly rugose ; lower surface glabrous; blade thick; lobes usually five though sometimes three; petiolar sinus medium in depth, wide; lower lateral sinus medium in depth, narrow; upper lateral sinus shallow, nar- row; margin dentate; teeth long, narrow. Flowers appear early for a Vinifera ; stamens upright. Fruit ripens the first of September and is a good keeper; clusters above medium in size, tapering, medium compact; berries medium to large, oval, yellowish-green, with thin bloom; skin thin, tender, neutral; flesh greenish-white, firm, juicy, meaty, sweet; quality good. LINDLEY (Labrusea, Vinifera) By common consent, Lindley (Plate XXII) is the best of the red grapes originated by Rogers in his crosses between La- brusca and Vinifera. The bunches are of only medium size and VARIETIES OF GRAPES 403 are loose, but the berries are well-formed, of uniform size and an attractive dark red color. The flesh is firm, fine-grained, juicy, tender with a peculiarly rich aromatic flavor. The skin is thick and tough but js not objectionable in fruit fully ripe. The fruit keeps and ships well, and the berries neither crack nor shatter. The vine is vigorous, hardy for a Vinifera hybrid, healthy but, as with most of its kind, susceptible to mildew. The chief defects of Lindley are self-sterility, preca- riousness in bearing and lack of adaptation to many soils. Lindley is a general favorite in the garden. In 1869 Rogers gave this grape its name in honor of John Lindley, the English botanist. Vine vigorous, usually hardy, susceptible to mildew. Canes very long, dark reddish-brown with thin bloom; nodes enlarged, usually flattened ; internodes long, thick; tendrils continuous, long, bifid or trifid. Leaves large, thick; upper surface light green, dull, slightly rugose; lower surface grayish-white, pubescent ; obscurely three-lobed with terminus acute; petiolar sinus deep, narrow, often closed and overlapping; teeth shallow. Flowers self-sterile, open in mid-season ; stamens reflexed. Fruit mid-season, keeps and ships well. Clusters long, broad, cylindrical, frequently single-shouldered, the shoulder being connected to the bunch by a long stem, loose; pedicel short, slender, smooth; brush short, pale green. Berries large, round-oval, dark-red with faint bloom; skin tough, adherent, unpigmented, strongly astringent ; flesh pale green, translucent, juicy, fine-grained, tender, vinous; good to best. Seeds adherent, two to five, notched, brown. LUCILE (Labrusea) In vigor, health, hardiness and productiveness, Lucile (Plate _ XXII) is not surpassed by any native grape. Unfortunately, the fruit characters are not so desirable. The size, form and color of bunches and berries are good, making a very attractive fruit, but the grapes have an obnoxious, foxy taste and odor and are pulpy and seedy. Lucilg is earlier than Concord, the crop 404 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING ripening with that of Worden or preceding it a few days. For an early variety, the fruit keeps well and in spite of thin skin ships well. The vine thrives in all grape soils. Lucile may be recommended where a hardy grape is desired and for localities in which the season is short. J. A. Putnam, Fredonia, New York, grew Lucile. The vine fruited first in 1890. It is a seedling of Wyoming, which it resembles in fruit and vine and surpasses in both. Vine vigorous, hardy, very productive. Canes long, light brown; nodes enlarged, flattened; internodes short; tendrils continuous, bifid or trifid. Leaves large, firm; upper surface light green, glossy, smooth; lower surface pale green, pubescent; leaf with terminus acute; petiolar sinus shallow, narrow, sometimes closed and overlapping ; basal sinus usually absent; lateral sinus a notch when present; teeth shallow. Flowers self-fertile, open early ; stamens upright. Fruit early, keeps well. Clusters large, long, slender, eylindrieal, usually single-shouldered, very compact; pedicel short, thick with few, small, inconspicuous warts; brush light brown. Berries large, round, dark red with thin bloom, persistent, firm; skin thin, tender, astringent; flesh pale green, translucent, juicy, tough, stringy, foxy ; fair in quality. Seeds adherent, one to four, small, broad, short, blunt, dark brown. LUTIE (Labrusea) Lutie (Plate XXIII) is chiefly valuable for its vine characters. The vines are vigorous, hardy, healthy and fruitful, although scarcely equaling Lucile in any of these characters. Pomologists differ widely as to the merits of the fruit, some claiming high quality for it and others declaring that it is no better than a wild Labrusca. The difference of opinion is due to a pecul- larity of the fruit; if eaten fresh, the quality, while far from being of the best, is not bad, but after being picked for several days it develops so much foxiness of flavor and aroma that it is scarcely edible. Lutie is a seedling found by L. C. Chisholm, Spring Hill, Tennessee. It was introduced in 1885. VARIETIES OF GRAPES 405 Vine vigorous, hardy, healthy, productive. Canes short, slender, dark reddish-brown; nodes enlarged; internodes short; tendrils continuous, short, bifid. Leaves medium in size; upper surface dark green, rugose; lower surface bronze or whitish-green, pubescent ; leaf usually not lobed with terminus acute; petiolar sinus deep, wide; basal sinus lacking; lateral sinus shallow and narrow when present ; teeth shallow, narrow. Flowers self-fertile, early; stamens upright. Fruit early, does not keep well. Clusters medium in size, short, broad, blunt, cylindrical, usually not shouldered, compact; pedicel short with small, seattering warts; brush slender, pale green. Berries large, round, dark red, dull with thin bloom, drop badly from pedicel, firm; skin tender, adherent, astringent; flesh pale green, translucent, juicy, tough, foxy; fair in quality. Seeds adherent, one to four, large, broad, short and blunt, dark brown. MALAGA (Vinifera) Malaga is one of the favorite table-grapes in California and also a popular grape to ship to eastern markets. In some parts of southern California, where the Muscats do not thrive, it is much grown, and in the San Joaquin Valley it is rather largely used in making raisins. It requires a long season and probably could not be grown in eastern regions except in the most favored localities. The description is compiled. Vine very vigorous, healthy and productive; wood reddish-brown, short-jointed. Leaves of medium size, smooth, leathery ; light glossy green above, lighter below; deeply lobed. Bunches very large, long, loose, shouldered, sometimes scraggly ; stem long and flexible; berries very large, oval, yellowish-green, covered with light bloom; skin thick; flesh firm, crisp, sweet and rich; quality good. Season late, keeps and ships well. McPIKE (Labrusea) McPike is noteworthy because of the large size of the berries and bunches. It is very similar to its parent, Worden, differ- 406 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING ing in having fewer but larger berries, grapes not as high in flavor and fewer and smaller seeds.. Because of the thin, tender skin, the berries crack badly. The grapes shell more or less, and the vines are less productive than those of Worden. The faults named debar it from becoming a commercial grape and it is not high enough in quality to make it of value for the amateur. This variety originated with H. G. McPike, Alton, Il!inois, from seed of Worden planted in 1890. Vine vigorous, hardy, very productive. Canes of medium length, dull reddish-brown; nodes enlarged, flattened; internodes very short; tendrils continuous, bifid or trifid. Leaves large, thick; upper surface light green, dull, rugose; lower surface grayish-white, heavily pubescent; leaf entire with terminus acute; petiolar sinus deep; basal and lateral sinuses lacking. Flowers nearly self-fertile. Fruit mid-season, keeps well. Clusters variable in size, broad, irregularly tapering, usually not shouldered; pedicel long, thick, smooth; brush long, slender, green with brown tinge. Berries unusu- ally large, round, purplish-black with heavy bloom, firm; skin eracks, adherent to pulp, astringent; flesh pale green, translucent, juicy, tender, stringy, vinous; fair to good. Seeds adherent, one to four, short, broad, blunt, plump, light brown. MARION (Vulpina, Labrusea) Black German, Marion Port Marion so closely resembles Clinton in botanical and horti- cultural characters as to be clearly of the same type. The vine is vigorous and hardy, but hardly sufficiently productive, and is susceptible to mildew and leaf-hoppers. The fruit is pleasantly sweet and spicy, although not high enough in quality for a table-grape, but makes a very good dark red wine. The fruit colors early but ripens late, hangs well on the vines and improves with a touch of frost. Marion was brought to notice by a Mr. Shepherd, Marion, Ohio, about 1850. VARIETIES OF GRAPES 407 Vine vigorous, hardy, productive. Canes very long, dark reddish- brown, covered with bloom; nodes enlarged, flattened; internodes very long; tendrils continuous, sometimes intermittent, long, bifid. Leaves very large; upper surface dark green, glossy; lower surface pale green, smooth; leaf entire, terminus acuminate; petiolar sinus very deep, narrow, often closed and overlapping; basal and lateral sinuses usually lacking; teeth shallow, wide. Flowers self-sterile, open very early; stamens reflexed. Fruit mid-season, keeps well. Clusters medium in size, short, slender, cylindrical, single-shouldered, compact; pedicel short, slender with a few inconspicuous warts; brush very short, wine-colored. Berries small, round, black, glossy with heavy bloom, persistent, firm ; skin thin, tough, adherent with much wine-colored pigment, astrin- gent; flesh dark green, translucent, juicy, fine-grained, tough, sprightly, spicy, tart; fair in quality. Seeds adherent, one to five, medium in size, broad, short, very plump, brown. MartTHa (Labrusea, Vinifera) Martha was at one time a popular green grape, but the introduction of superior varieties has reduced its popularity until now it is but little grown. It is a seedling of Concord and resembles its parent, differing chiefly as follows: fruit green, a week earlier, bunch and berry smaller, flavor far better, being sweeter, more delicate and less foxy. The vine of Martha is a lighter shade of green, is less robust, and the blossoms open a few days earlier than those of Concord. One of the defects of Martha, and the chief cause of its going out of favor, is that it does not keep nor ship well. The variety is still being planted in the South but is generally abandoned in the North. Samuel Miller, Calmdale, Pennsylvania, grew Martha from seed of Concord; it was introduced about 1868. Vine hardy, productive, susceptible to attacks of mildew. Canes long, dark reddish-brown, surface with thin bloom, roughened ; nodes enlarged, slightly flattened ; tendrils continuous, or intermittent, bifid. Leaves large, thick; upper surface light green; lower surface light 408 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING bronze, heavily pubescent; lobes wanting or faint; petiolar sinus shallow, very wide; teeth irregular. Flowers self-fertile, open in mid-season ; stamens upright. Fruit early mid-season. Clusters medium in size, tapering, single- shouldered, loose; pedicel short, slender; brush very short, green. Berries medium in size, round, light green with thin bloom, persistent ; skin thin, very tender, adherent; flesh pale green, Juicy, tough, fine- grained, slightly foxy; very good. Seeds few in number, adherent, broad, blunt, dark brown. MASssaASsoIr (Labrusea, Vinifera) Massasoit is distinguished as the earliest of Rogers’ hybrids, ripening with Delaware. The grapes have the peculiarity of being best before full maturity, developing, after ripening, a degree of foxiness which impairs the quality. In shape and size of berry and bunch, there is a striking resemblance to Isabella, but the color is that of Catawba. The texture of the fruit is especially good, firm but tender and juicy, while the flavor is rich and sweet. The vine is vigorous, hardy and productive but subject to mildew and rot. Massasoit is worth a place in the home vineyard and as an early grape of fine quality for local markets. Vine very vigorous, hardy, very productive, subject to rot and mildew. Canes long, thick, dark brown with reddish tinge; nodes enlarged, flattened; tendrils continuous, long, trifid or bifid. Leaves variable in size; upper surface light green, dull, smooth; lower sur- face pale green, pubescent; lobes three to five with terminus acute; petiolar sinus deep, narrow; basal sinus shallow, narrow, obscure ; teeth shallow. Flowers self-sterile, open late; stamens reflexed. Fruit early, keeps well. Clusters variable in size, broad, eylin- drical, frequently single-shouldered ; pedicel slender with a few in- distinct warts; brush pale green. Berries large, round-oval, dark brownish-red, dull with thin bloom, very persistent, firm; skin thin, tender, adherent, astringent; flesh pale green, translucent, juicy, fine-grained, soft, stringy, foxy; good to very good. Seeds adherent, one to five, large, broad, distinctly notched, plump, blunt. VARIETIES OF GRAPES 409 MAXATAWNEY (Labrusea, Vinifera) While at one time very popular, grape-growers now seldom hear of Maxatawney. It is a southern grape, ripening its fruit in the North only occasionally. The variety is interesting historically as being the first good green grape and as showing unmistakable Vinifera characters, another example of the fortuitous hybridization which gave so many valuable varieties before artificial hybridization of Vinifera with native grapes had been tried. In 1843, a man living in Eagleville, Pennsyl- vania, received several bunches of grapes from Maxatawney. The seeds of these grapes were planted and one grew, the result- ing plant being the original vine of Maxatawney. Vine vigorous, doubtfully hardy, variable in productiveness. Canes medium in length, slender, reddish; nodes enlarged, flattened ; internodes short; tendrils continuous, bifid. Leaves large, dark green, thick; lower surface grayish-white with tinge of bronze, heavily pubescent; lobes three to five; petiolar sinus narrow; teeth shallow. Flowers self-sterile, open in mid-season; stamens upright. Fruit late, keeps well. Clusters small to medium, short, slender, cylindrical, occasionally with a small, single shoulder, compact; pedicel long, slender, warty; brush long, yellow. Berries variable in size, oval, pale red or dull green with amber tinge, with thin bloom, persistent; skin tough, astringent; flesh tender, foxy; good to very good. Seeds free, few, large, very broad, blunt. Memory (Rotundifolia) Memory is one of the best of the Rotundifolia grapes for the garden and local markets, its fruits being especially good for dessert. As yet, however, the variety has not been widely distributed even in North Carolina where it originated. The vine is given credit for being the most vigorous grower and the most productive of the grapes of its species. Memory is probably a seedling of Thomas, which it much resembles, 410 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING having been found in a vineyard of Thomas grapes near White- ville, North Carolina, by T. 5S. Memory, about 1868. Vine very vigorous, healthy, productive. Leaves large, longer than broad, thick, smooth with coarsely serrate margins. Flowers perfect. Fruit ripens in September in North Carolina; clusters large, with from four to twelve berries which hang unusually well for a variety of V. Rotundifolia. Berries very large, round-oblong, deep brownish- black, almost jet black; skin thick; flesh tender, juicy, sweet; good to best. MERRIMAC (Labrusea, Vinifera) Merrimac is often accredited as the best black grape among Rogers’ hybrids, but an analysis of the characters of the several black varieties grown by Rogers shows that it is surpassed by Wilder, Herbert and possibly Barry. The vine is strong in growth, productive, hardy and exempt from fungal diseases ; but the grapes are not high in quality, and flesh, skin and seed characters are such that the fruit is not as pleasant to eat as the other black varieties named. Merrimac is worthy a place in collections for the sake of variety. Rogers gave this variety the name Merrimac in 1869. Vine vigorous, usually hardy, productive. Canes slender, dark brown, surface roughened; nodes enlarged, flattened; internodes short; tendrils intermittent, short, bifid. Leaves large, thin; upper surface very light green, glossy, smooth; lower surface pale green, pubescent and cobwebby; lobes three with terminal one obtuse; petiolar sinus deep, narrow, sometimes closed and overlapping; basal sinus usually lacking; lateral sinus shallow, narrow; teeth shallow. Flowers self-sterile, open in mid-season; stamens reflexed. Fruit mid-season, keeps and ships well. Clusters variable in size, broad, tapering; pedicel slender, covered with numerous inconspicuous . warts; brush wine-colored. Berries large, round, black, glossy with abundant bloom, persistent, firm; skin thick, tough, adherent, astrin- gent; flesh light green, translucent, juicy, fine-grained, tender, stringy ; good. Seeds adherent, one to five, broad, long, with enlarged neck, brown. VARIETIES OF GRAPES 411 MILLS (Labrusea, Vinifera) The bunches and berries of Mills are large and well-formed ; the berries are firm and solid, with the skin adherent as in Vi- niferas; the flesh is juicy and parts readily from the seeds; the flavor is rich, sweet and vinous; and the grapes are hardly surpassed in keeping quality. But when the fruit characters of Mills have been praised, nothing further can be said in its favor. The vines are neither vigorous, hardy nor fruitful and are very subject to mildew; neither wood nor roots ripen well in the North in average seasons; and the variety is a most difficult one for nurserymen to grow. Mills is of doubtful commercial value, but for the garden it is possible that the grower may be able to graft it to advantage on some variety with better vine characters. William H. Mills, Hamilton, Ontario, grew Mills about 1870 from seed of Muscat Hamburg fertilized by Creveling. Vine medium in vigor, hardiness and productiveness. Canes long, thick, light brown; nodes enlarged, flattened; tendrils intermittent, bifid or trifid. Leaves large, thick; upper surface dark green, dull, rugose; lower surface pale green, cobwebby ; lobes three to five with terminus acute; petiolar sinus intermediate in depth and width; basal and lateral sinuses deep and wide; teeth deep. Flowers self-fertile, open in mid-season; stamens upright. Fruit mid-season, keeps well. Clusters large, long, slender, cy- lindrical, often double-shouldered, compact; pedicel slender with nu- merous, small warts; brush long, wine-colored. Berries large, oval, jet-black with abundant bloom, persistent, firm; skin thick, tough, adherent; flesh light green, translucent, juicy, rich, tender, sprightly, vinous, sweet; very good to best. Seeds free, one to three, large, brown. Mitsu (Rotundifolia) Mish is a favorite Rotundifolia in North Carolina, being planted extensively in some parts of that state. Its outstand- 412 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING ing characters are vigor and productiveness in vine and high quality in the fruit. Mish is named by many as the best all- round Rotundifolia, being of value for dessert, wine and grape- juice. The variety was found by W. M. Mish, about 1846, near Washington, North Carolina. Vine very vigorous, productive, healthy, open in growth; canes somewhat trailing. Leaves large, round, thick, smooth, leathery with coarsely dentate margin. Flowers perfect. Fruit late, does not ripen uniformly, keeps and ships well. Clusters of medium size with from six to fifteen berries which cling well to the pedicel. Berries of medium size, round-oval, deep reddish-black with numerous conspicuous dots; skin thin, cracking in wet weather ; flesh tender, juicy, sweet, exceptionally well flavored; very good to best. MIsston (Vinifera) Of all grapes, Mission has probably played the most impor- tant part in the vineyards of California. Grown from the earliest times at the old missions, its source or its name has never been determined. Its viticultural value for table and Wine-press was early appreciated by California grape-growers, and its culture rapidly spread to every county in the state adapted to grape-growing. With vines vigorous, healthy and productive, bearing grapes of delicious quality, Mission is a mainstay on the Pacific slope, surpassed by few vineyard varieties for general usefulness. The description is compiled. Vine vigorous, healthy, productive; wood short-jointed, grayish- brown, dull, dark. Leaf medium to large, slightly oblong, with large, deeply-cut compound teeth; basal sinus widely opened, primary sinuses narrow and shallow; smooth on both sides with scattered tomentum below, bright green above, lighter below. Bunch divided into many small, distinct lateral clusters, shouldered, loose, sometimes very loose; berries of medium size, purple or almost black with heavy bloom; skin thin; flesh firm, crisp, juicy, sweet, rich and delicious. Seeds rather large and prominent; season late, VARIETIES OF GRAPES 413 Missourr RIEesLINnG (Vulpina, Labrusea) Missouri Riesling attains perfection only in the South. The vines are hardy, vigorous, productive and healthy in the North, as a rule, but the fruit is lacking in quality. In the South, Missouri Riesling is a beautiful fruit when well grown and has many good qualities of fruit and vine. It originated with Nicholas Grein, Hermann, Missouri, about 1870, probably from seed of Taylor. Vine vigorous, hardy, productive. Canes very long, numerous, thick, dark brown; nodes enlarged; internodes long; tendrils contin- uous, long, trifid or bifid. Leaves large, thick; upper surface dark green, glossy, smooth; lower surface pale green, thinly pubescent ; lobes five with terminal one acuminate; petiolar sinus deep, narrow; basal sinus shallow, wide; lateral sinus deep, wide; teeth deep, wide. Flowers self-fertile, open in mid-season; stamens upright. Fruit late, does not keep nor ship well. Clusters short, eylin- drical, single-shouldered; pedicel long with few small warts; brush green. Berries of medium size, round, yellowish-green changing to light red with thin bloom, persistent, firm; skin sprinkled with small brown dots, thin, tough, adherent, astringent; flesh pale green, trans- lucent, juicy, tender, fine-grained, lacking in aroma, mild; fair in quality. Seeds adherent, one to four, surface rough, dark brown. MONTEFIORE (Vulpina, Labruseca) Montefiore is extensively grown in Missouri and the South- west but is almost unknown in the North and East. It is reported as succeeding in the Lake District of Ohio and, with the exception that it is uncertain in bearing and not always productive, it grows well in sections of New York. While it is essentially a wine-grape, yet it is pleasing in taste and texture of fruit and is far better in quality than many of the coarser Labruscas commonly cultivated. It keeps and ships well 414 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING and presents an attractive appearance. Jacob Rommel, Morrison, Missouri, grew this variety about 1875 from seed of Taylor fertilized by Ives. Vine vigorous and hardy. Canes long, thick, dark brown with thin bloom; nodes enlarged, flattened; internodes long; tendrils contin- uous, long, bifid. Leaves thick; upper surface light green, dull, smooth; lower surface grayish-white, pubescent; lobes three when present with terminus acute; petiolar sinus wide; basal sinus lacking ; lateral sinus shallow when present; teeth deep. Flowers semi-fertile, open in mid-season; stamens upright. Fruit mid-season, keeps well. Clusters small, short, tapering, single-shouldered, the shoulder being connected to the buneh by a long stem, compact; pedicel short, slender, smooth; brush red. Berries small, oval, often compressed, black, glossy with abundant bloom, per- sistent, firm; skin thin, tough, adherent, astringent; flesh green, translucent, juicy, fine-grained, tender, melting, vinous, sweet; fair to good. Seeds free, one to five, small, broad, faintly notched, short, plump, brown. Moore EArty (Labrusea) Moore Early (Plate X XIV) is the standard grape of its season. Its fruit cannot be described better than as an early Concord. The vines are readily distinguishable from those of Concord, differing chiefly in being less productive. To grow the variety satisfactorily, the soil must be rich, well-drained and loose, must be frequently cultivated, and the vines should be pruned severely. The bunches of Moore Early are not as large as those of Concord and are less compact; the berries shell rather more easily, and the skin cracks more readily. The flesh characters and the flavor are essentially those of Con- cord, although the quality is not as high as in the older variety. The quality is, however, much higher than that of Champion and Hartford, its chief competitors, and varieties which it should replace. Moore Early is by no means an ideal grape for its season, but until something better is introduced it will probably remain the best early commercial sort. Captain VARIETIES OF GRAPES A415 John B. Moore, Concord, Massachusetts, originated this vari- ety from seed of Concord, planted about 1868. Vine vigorous, hardy, unproductive. Canes short, dark reddish- brown; nodes enlarged, flattened; internodes short; tendrils contin- uous, bifid or trifid. Leaves large, thick; upper surface dark green, dull; lower surface tinged with bronze, heavily pubescent; leaf usually not lobed, terminus acute; petiolar sinus wide; basal sinus lacking; lateral sinus a notch when present; teeth shallow, narrow. Flowers fertile, open in mid-season; stamens upright. Fruit early, does not keep well. Clusters medium in size, length, and breadth, cylindrical, sometimes single-shouldered, loose; pedicel short, thick, smooth; brush short, pale green. Berries large, round, purplish-black, firm; skin tender, adherent; flesh green, translucent, juicy, fine-grained, tough with slight foxiness; fair to good. Seeds one to four, large, broad, plump, blunt, brown with yellow tinge at tips. MoscaTELLo (Vinifera) Moscatello Nero. Black Muscat Beautiful in appearance and having a delicate Muscat taste and aroma, this variety is one of the good table-grapes of the Pacific slope. Unfortunately it ripens so late that it is hardly worth trying in the East. The variety has the reputa- tion of being very productive. The description is compiled. Vine vigorous, healthy, very productive. Leaves of medium size, with deep upper and shallow lower sinuses; glabrous above, slightly downy below, very hairy on the veins, with long, sharp teeth. Bunch large to very large, long, loose, conico-cylindrical, winged; berries very large, borne on long slender pedicels, dark purple, almost black ; skin thin but tough; flesh rather soft, juicy; flavor sweet, rich, aromatic, musky; quality very good. Season late, does not keep well. Moyer (Labrusea, Bourquiniana) Jordan, Moyer’s Early Red Moyer is almost a counterpart of its parent, Delaware. Were it not that the variety is from one to two weeks earlier 416 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING than Delaware, and somewhat hardier, hence better adapted for cold regions, it could have no place in viticulture. Com- pared with Delaware, the vine is hardly as vigorous and is less productive, but is freer from rot and mildew. The bunches are much like those of Delaware but have the fault of setting fruit imperfectly even when cross-pollination is assured; the berries are a little larger, of much the same color and of like flavor, rich, sweet, with pure vinousness and without a trace of foxiness. The fruit keeps well, ships well and does not crack nor shell. Moyer is well established in Canada, proving per- fectly hardy wherever Concord is grown, possibly standing even more cold. W. H. Read, Port Dalhousie, Ontario, raised the original vine of Moyer, about 1880, from seed of Delaware fertilized by Miller’s Burgundy. Vine vigorous, hardy, healthy, unproductive. Canes numerous, slender, dull, dark reddish-brown; nodes enlarged, flattened; inter- nodes short; tendrils continuous, long, bifid or trifid. Leaves small ; upper surface dark green, dull, smooth; lower surface pale green or with faint blue tinge, heavily pubescent; lobes two to five with terminus acute; petiolar sinus shallow; basal sinus shallow when present ; lateral sinus shallow, narrow; teeth very shallow, narrow. Flowers self-sterile, open early ; stamens reflexed. Fruit early, keeps well but loses color if kept too long. Clusters small, short, slender, tapering, sometimes single-shouldered ; pedicel short with small warts; brush yellowish-green. Berries small, oblate, dark red with faint bloom, persistent, firm; skin tough, free, astrin- gent; flesh translucent, juicy, tender, fine-grained, vinous; good to very good. Seeds free, one to four, broad, short, very blunt, brown with yellow tinge at tips. MuscaTEL (Vinifera) White Frontignan This old and standard sort is rather commonly grown in some of the grape regions of California to follow Chasselas PLate XXXI.— Worden (X3)- at) 7 VARIETIES OF GRAPES 417 Golden. It might be tried with some show of success in favored grape regions in the East. The description is compiled. Vine of medium size, vigorous, healthy; canes strong, spreading, reddish-brown with short internodes. Leaves of medium size, thin, five-lobed; glabrous except on the lower sides of the well-marked ribs where a few hairs show. Bunches long, cylindrical, regular, compact ; berries round, golden-yellow becoming amber; flavor sweet, rich, aromatic, peculiar; quality very good. Season late mid-season, keeps and ships well. Muscat HAMBURG (Vinifera) Muscat Hamburg (Plate X XV) is an old European grape well known in some parts of America in greenhouse graperies, since it is one of the best for forcing. All who know the beautiful fruits of this variety grown in forecing-houses will want to test it out of doors, where at the Geneva, New York, Experiment Station, they have done well, many clusters attaining a weight of a pound anda half to two pounds. The accom- panying plate, the fruit much less than half natural size, shows what a fine grape Muscat Hamburg is. One is struck with wondering admiration at a vine laden with these grapes growing alongside Concord, Niagara or Delaware. The quality is delectable, the quintessence of the flavors and aromas which make the grape a favorite fruit. The grapes keep long and retain their form, size, color and rich, delicate flavor almost to the end. This variety is a treasure to the amateur; and the professional who wants another grape for local markets should try grafting over a few vines of some native to this sort, fol- lowing the directions given in Chapter X in caring for the vines. Vines vigorous, tender, need protection during the winter; canes long, numerous, slender to medium, light brown, darker at the nodes which are enlarged and flattened. Leaves medium to large, inter- mediate in thickness; upper surface light green, dull; lower surface pale green, faintly pubescent, densely hairy. 25 418 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING Fruit ripens in October, ships and keeps well; clusters very large, long, broad, tapering, single or double-shouldered. Berries large, firm, oval, very dark purplish-red, covered with lilac bloom, very persistent; skin thick, adheres strongly to the pulp; flesh pale green, translucent, meaty, very juicy, tender, vinous, musky, sweet, rich ; very good to best; seeds separating easily from the pulp, large. Muscat oF ALEXANDRIA This is possibly the leading table- and raisin-grape of the Pacific slope. From the literature or from a visit to vineyards, one cannot make out whether one or several varieties are grown under the name. Probably there are several strains grown under the distinctive name “Muscat” which applies to these sweet, light yellow, musky grapes. This is one of the standard sorts to force indoors but requires too long a season for out of doors in the East. The following description is compiled : Vine short, straggling, bushy, sometimes forming a bush rather than a vine, very productive; wood gray with dark spots, short- jointed. Leaf round, five-lobed; bright green above, lighter green below. Bunches long and loose, shouldered; berry oblong, light yellow and transparent when fully mature, covered with white bloom ; flesh firm, crisp; flavor sweet and very musky; quality good. Season late, the laterals producing a second and sometimes even a third crop. NIAGARA (Labrusea, Vinifera) Niagara (Plate XXVI) is the leading American green grape, holding the rank among grapes of this color that Concord main- tains among black varieties. It is, however, a less valuable grape than Concord, and it is doubtful whether it should be ranked much higher than several other green grapes. In vigor and productiveness, when the two grapes are on equal footing as to adaptability, Niagara and Concord rank the same. In hardi- ness of root and vine, Niagara falls short of Concord; it cannot VARIETIES OF GRAPES 419 be relied on without winter protection where the thermometer falls below zero. Niagara has much of the foxiness of the wild Labrusea, distasteful to many palates. Both bunches and berries of Niagara are larger than those of Concord and are better formed, making a handsomer fruit if the colors are liked equally well. The fruit shells as badly as that of Con- cord and does not keep longer. Both vine and fruit of Niagara are more susceptible to fungal diseases than those of Concord, especially to black-rot, which proves a veritable scourge with this variety in unfavorable seasons. Niagara was produced by C. L. Hoag and B. W. Clark, Lockport, New York, from seed of Concord fertilized by Cassady planted in 1868. Vine vigorous, lacking in hardiness, very productive. Canes long, thick, reddish-brown deepening in color at the nodes which are enlarged and slightly flattened; internodes long, thick; tendrils continuous, long, bifid or trifid. Leaves large, thick; upper surface glossy, dark green, smooth; lower surface pale green, pubescent; lobes three to five with terminus acute; petiolar sinus of medium depth and width; basal sinus shallow, wide, often toothed; lateral sinus wide, frequently toothed; teeth shallow, variable in width. Flowers self-fertile, open in mid-season; stamens upright. Fruit mid-season, keeps well. Clusters large, long, broad, tapering, frequently single-shouldered, compact; pedicel thick with a few, small, inconspicuous warts; brush pale green, long. Berries large, oval, pale yellowish-green with thin bloom, persistent, firm; skin thin, tender, adherent, astringent; flesh light green, translucent, juicy, fine-grained, tender, foxy; good. Seeds free, one to six, deeply notched, brown. Noau (Vulpina, Labrusea) Noah is little grown at present outside of Missouri, where it is still planted somewhat. Noah and Elvira are often con- fused but there are very marked differences. The clusters of Elvira are smaller, the berries are more foxy in taste, and the skins are more tender and crack more readily than do those of Noah. The large, dark, glossy green leaves make the vines of 420 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING this variety very handsome. As with Elvira and other varieties of this group, Noah is of little value in the North. It origi- nated with Otto Wasserzieher, Nauvoo, Illinois, from seed of Taylor planted in 1869. Vine vigorous, doubtfully hardy, productive. Canes long, thick, dark brown, surface roughened; nodes enlarged, flattened; tendrils continuous, bifid or trifid. Leaves large; upper surface dark green, glossy, smooth; lower surface pale green, thinly pubescent; leaf usually not lobed with terminus acuminate; petiolar sinus deep, wide; basal sinus lacking; lateral sinus very shallow when present; teeth shallow, wide. Flowers semi-fertile, open early; stamens upright. Fruit late mid-season, does not ship nor keep well. Clusters variable in size, cylindrical, single-shouldered, compact; pedicel short with a few small warts; brush short, brown. Berries small, round, light green tinged with yellow, dull with thin bloom, firm; skin adherent to pulp; flesh yellowish-green, translucent, Juicy, tough, fine-grained, vinous, sprightly; good. Seeds adherent, one to four, dark brown. NORTHERN MUSCADINE (Labrusea) That this variety, together with Lucile, Lutie and other grapes with the foxy taste strongly marked, has not become popular, in spite of good vine characters, is evidence that the American public do not desire such grapes. In appearance of fruit, Northern Muscadine is much like Lutie, the two being distinguished from other grapes by an unmistakable odor. A serious defect of the fruit is that the berries shatter badly as soon as they reach maturity. Taken as a whole, the vine characters of this variety are very good and offer possibilities for the grape-breeder. The variety originated at New Lebanon, New York, and was brought to notice by D. J. Hawkins and Philemon Stewart of the Society of Shakers about 1852. Vine vigorous, productive, healthy, hardy. Canes slender, dark brown, heavily pubescent; tendrils continuous, bifid, dehisece early. Leaves large, round, thick; upper surface dull, rugose; lower surface VARIETIES OF GRAPES 421 dark bronze, heavily pubescent. Flowers self-fertile, open in mid- season; stamens upright. Fruit early mid-season, does not keep well. Clusters medium in size, short, occasionally single-shouldered, compact. Berries large, oval, dark amber with thin bloom, drop badly from the pedicel; skin tough, adherent, astringent; flesh pale green, juicy, fine-grained, tender, soft, very foxy, sweet; poor in quality. Seeds free, numerous, large, broad, faintly notched, long, brown. NORTON (Astivalis, Labrusea) Norton is one of the leading wine-grapes in eastern America, the fruit having small value for any other purpose than wine or, possibly, grape-juice. The vine is hardy but requires a long, warm season to reach maturity so that it is seldom grown successfully north of the Potomac. Norton thrives in rich alluvial clays, gravels or sands, the only requisite seemingly being a fair amount of fertility and soil warmth. The vines are robust; very productive, especially on fertile soils; as free, or more so, from fungal diseases as any other of our native grapes; and are very resistant to phylloxera. The bunches are of but medium size and the berries are small. The grapes are pleasant eating when fully ripe, rich, spicy and pure-flavored but tart if not quite ripe. The variety is difficult to propagate from cuttings and to transplant, and the vines do not bear grafts well. The origin of Norton is uncertain, but it has been under cultivation since before 1830, when it was first described. Vine very vigorous, healthy, half-hardy, productive. Canes long, thick, dark brown with abundant bloom; nodes much enlarged ; inter- nodes. long; tendrils intermittent, occasionally continuous, long, bifid, sometimes trifid. Leaves large, irregularly round ; upper surface pale green, dull, rugose; lower surface pale green, pubescent; leaf usually not lobed with terminus acute; petiolar sinus deep, narrow, sometimes closed and overlapping; basal sinus usually absent; lateral sinus shallow or a mere notch when present. Flowers self-fertile, late; stamens upright, 422 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING Fruit late, keeps well. Clusters medium in size, short, broad, tapering, single-shouldered, compact; pedicel slender with a few warts; brush dull, wine-colored. Berries small, round-oblate, black, glossy with heavy bloom, persistent, soft; skin thin, free with much dark red pigment; flesh green, translucent, juicy, tender, spicy, tart. Seeds free, two to six, small, brown. Oporto (Vulpina, Labrusca) Oporto was at one time in demand as a wine grape because its wine resembled in color and flavor that from Oporto. The variety is now scarcely known, being inferior in most of its hor- ticultural characters to others of its species, but might be valu- able in breeding for some of its characters. The vine is very hardy, unusually free from fungal diseases, is very resistant to phylloxera and has been used in France as a phylloxera-resist- ant grafting-stock. The juice is very thick and dark, a deep purple, hence suitable for adding color to wine or grape-juice. The origin of Oporto is unknown. It was brought into culti- vation about 1860 by E. W. Sylvester, Lyons, New York. Vine very vigorous, hardy, healthy, variable in productiveness. Canes long, reddish-brown; nodes enlarged, flattened; internodes long, diaphragm thin; tendrils continuous, bifid. Stamens reflexed. Fruit mid-season, ships and keeps well. Clusters small, cylindrical, often single-shouldered. Berries medium in size, round, black, glossy with abundant bloom, persistent, firm; skin very thin, tender, with much dark wine-colored pigment; flesh white, sometimes with purple tinge, juicy, fine-grained, solid, sweet, spicy; fair quality. Seeds free, numerous, small, broad, faintly notched, sharply pointed, plump, dark brown. OTHELLO (Vinifera, Vulpina, Labrusea) Arnold’s Hybrid, Canadian Hamburg, Canadian Hybrid In France, Othello does remarkably well as a direct producer and is used also for a resistant stock. While most of its VARIETIES OF GRAPES 423 characters are spoken of in the superlative by the French, in America the variety is not so highly esteemed because of sus- ceptibility to fungi. Moreover, the fruit matures so late that it could never become a valuable variety for the North. It is in no sense a table-grape but makes a well-colored, pleasant wine. Charles Arnold, Paris, Ontario, grew Othello from seed of Clinton fertilized by Black Hamburg and planted in 1859. Vine vigorous, hardy, productive. Canes long, brown; nodes enlarged, flattened; tendrils continuous, sometimes intermittent, bifid or trifid. Leaves of average size; upper surface light green, dull and smooth; lower surface pale green, pubescent; lobes three to five with terminal lobe acute; petiolar sinus deep, very narrow, frequently closed and overlapping; basal sinus shallow, narrow; lateral sinus deep; teeth deep, wide; stamens upright. Fruit late, keeps fairly well. Clusters large, long, broad, tapering, frequently with a loose single shoulder, compact; pedicel long, slender with numerous small warts; brush short, wine-colored. Berries large, oval, black, glossy with abundant bloom, very persistent; skin thin, tough, adherent with red pigment; flesh dark green, very juicy, fine-grained, tough, sprightly ; low in quality. Seeds free, one to three, neck sometimes swollen, brown. OzaRK (Astivalis, Labrusca) Ozark belongs to the South and to Missouri in particular. Its merits and demerits have been threshed out by the Mis- sourl grape-growers with the result that its culture is some- what increasing. It is a grape of low quality, partly, perhaps, from overbearing, which it habitually does unless the fruit is thinned. The vine is healthy and a very strong grower, but is self-sterile, which is against it as a market sort. In spite of self-sterility and low quality, Ozark is a promising variety for the country south of Pennsylvania. Ozark originated with J. Stayman, Leavenworth, Kansas, from seed of unknown source. The variety was introduced about 1890. 424 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING Vine very vigorous, hardy, productive. Canes long, thick with thin bloom, surface roughened ; nodes enlarged, flattened; internodes long; tendrils intermittent, usually bifid. Leaves dense, large; upper surface light green; lower surface pale green, thinly pubescent, ecobwebby; lobes three to five; petiolar sinus deep, narrow; serra- tions shallow, narrow. Flowers self-sterile or nearly so, open late; stamens reflexed. Fruit late, keeps well. Clusters large, long, usually with a long, loose shoulder, very compact; pedicel short, thick, smooth; brush long, red. Berries variable in size, dull black with abundant bloom, persistent ; skin tough with much wine-colored pigment; flesh tender, mild; fair in quality. Seeds free, small. | PALOMINO (Vinifera) Golden Chasselas. Listan This variety seems to be grown in California under the three names given — while in France Palomino is described as a bluish-black grape. Palomino seems to be grown commonly in California as a table-grape and is worth trying in eastern America. The variety received under the name Palomino from California at the New York Experiment Station has the following characters, agreeing closely with those set down by Californian viticulturists : Fruit ripens about the 20th of October, keeping qualities good; clusters medium to large, long, single-shouldered, tapering, loose; berries medium to small, roundish, pale greenish-yellow, thin bloom; skin and the adhering flesh medium tender and crisp, flesh surrounding seeds melting; flavor sweet, vinous; quality good. PEABODY (Vulpina, Labrusea, Vinifera) Peabody is as yet a comparatively unimportant offspring of Clinton. The grapes are of excellent quality. It appears to do better in the northern tier of states or in Canada, than VARIETIES OF GRAPES 425 farther south. This variety was grown by J. H. Ricketts about 1870. Vine vigorous, hardy, productive. Canes long, numerous, thick, light brown with ash-gray tinge, darker at nodes, covered with thin bloom; nodes enlarged, flattened; internodes short; tendrils inter- mittent, bifid or trifid. Leaves medium in size; upper surface dark green, thin; lower surface pale green, nearly glabrous; lobes three, acuminate; petiolar sinus shallow, wide; serration deep, narrow. Flowers semi-fertile, mid-season; stamens upright. Fruit early, keeps well. Clusters large, long, usually with a shoulder connected to the bunch by along stem, compact; pedicel short, slender, warty; brush short, green. Berries oval, black, glossy, covered with thin bloom, persistent; skin thick, tough; flesh very juicy, tender, vinous, spicy, agreeably sweet at the skin, tart at the center; good. Seeds free, broad. PERFECTION (Labrusea, Bourquiniana, Vinifera) Perfection is a seedling of Delaware, which it greatly re- sembles but does not equal in fruit; its fruits being hardly as high in quality, do not keep as well, shrivel more before ripen- ing, and shell more readily. In its vine characters, it is much _more like a Labrusca than Delaware, suggesting that it is a Delaware cross. In the Southwest, Perfection is considered a valuable early red grape. J. Stayman, Leavenworth, Kansas, grew Perfection from seed of Delaware; it was sent out for testing about 1890. Vine vigorous, healthy, injured in severe winters, productive. Canes of medium length and number, slender; nodes enlarged, flat- tened ; internodes short; tendrils intermittent, trifid or bifid. Leaves healthy, medium in size; upper surface light green; lower surface grayish-white with a tinge of bronze, heavily pubescent; lobes wanting or three to five; petiolar sinus shallow, wide; serration shallow. Flowers self-fertile or nearly so, open in mid-season; stamens upright. Fruit early. Clusters usually single-shouldered, compact; pedicel short, slender, smooth; brush short, yellow. Berries small, round, red _ but less brilliant than Delaware with faint bloom, inclined to drop from pedicel, soft; skin thin, free from astringency; flesh medium in 426 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING juiciness and tenderness, vinous, mild, sweet; good in quality. Seeds adherent, numerous, small, often with an enlarged neck. PERKINS (Labrusea, Vinifera) At one time Perkins was grown largely as an early grape but has been discarded very generally on account of the poor qual- ity of the fruit. The pulp of the grape is hard and the flavor is that of Wyoming and Northern Muscadine, grapes char- acterized by disagreeable foxiness. As with nearly all Labrus- cas, Perkins is a poor keeper. Notwithstanding the faults of its fruit, the variety may have value in regions where grape- growing is precarious; for in fruiting it is one of the most re- liable grapes cultivated, the vines being hardy, vigorous, pro- ductive and free from fungal diseases. Perkins is an accidental seedling found about 1830 in the garden of Jacob Perkins, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. Vine vigorous, hardy, healthy, productive. Canes long, numerous, thick, dark brown, deepening in color at the nodes, surface heavily pubescent; nodes enlarged, flattened; internodes long; tendrils con- tinuous, bifid or trifid. Leaves medium in size, thick; upper surface rugose; lower surface heavily pubescent; veins distinct; lobes three ; petiolar sinus deep, narrow; serration shallow. Flowers self-fertile, early ; stamens upright. Fruit early, ships well. Clusters of medium size and length, broad, eylindrieal, often with a single shoulder, compact; pedicel short, thick, warty; brush long, yellow. Berries large, oval, pale lilae or light red with thin bloom, inclined to drop from the pedicel, soft; skin thin, tough, without pigment; flesh white, juicy, stringy, fine- grained, firm, meaty, very foxy; poor in quality. Seeds adherent, numerous, medium in size, notehed. POCKLINGTON (Labrusea) Before the advent of Niagara, Pocklington (Plate XXIT) was the leading green grape. The variety has the fatal fault, how- VARIETIES OF GRAPES 427 ever, of ripening its crop late, which with some minor defects has caused it to fall below Niagara for northern grape districts. Pocklington is a seedling of Concord and resembles its parent in vine characters; the vines are fully equal to or surpass those of Concord in hardiness, but are of slower growth and not quite as healthy, vigorous nor productive. In quality, the grapes are as good if not better than those of Concord or Ni- agara, being sweet, rich and pleasantly flavored, although as with the other grapes named, it has too much foxiness for criti- eal consumers. Pocklington is not equal to several other grapes of its season in quality, as Iona, Jefferson, Diana, Dutchess and Catawba, but it is far above the average and for this reason should be retained. John Pocklington, Sandy Hill, New York, grew Pocklington from seed of Concord about 1870. Vine medium in vigor, hardy. Canes of medium length, number and size, dark reddish-brown; nodes enlarged, flattened; tendrils contin- uous, bifid or trifid. Leaves variable in size, thick; upper surface light green, glossy ; lower surface tinged with bronze, pubescent ; lobes one to three with terminus acuminate; petiolar sinus deep, wide; teeth narrow. Flowers self-fertile, mid-season; stamens upright. Fruit late mid-season, keeps and ships well. Clusters large, eylin- drical, often single-shouldered, compact; pedicel short, thick with afew small warts; brush short, green. Berries large, oblate, yellowish- green with tinge of amber, with thin bloom, firm; skin with seattering russet dots, thin, tender, adherent, faintly astringent; flesh light green with yellow tinge, translucent, juicy, tough, fine-grained, slightly foxy; good. Seeds adherent, one to six, of medium length and breadth. POUGHKEEPSIE (Bourquiniana, Labrusea, Vinifera) Poughkeepsie has been known long on the Hudson River, yet it is now little grown there and has not been disseminated widely elsewhere. In quality of fruit, it is equal to the best American varieties, but the vine characters are all poor and the variety is thus effectually debarred from common cultiva- tion. Both vine and fruit resemble those of Delaware, but in 428 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING neither does it quite equal the latter. In particular, the vine is more easily winter-killed and is less productive than that of Delaware. The grapes ripen a little earlier than those of the last named sort and this, with their beauty and fine quality, is sufficient to recommend it for the garden at least. About 1865, A. J. Caywood, Marlboro, New York, grew Pough- keepsie from seed of Iona fertilized by mixed pollen of Delaware and Walter. Vine of medium vigor. Canes short, thick, dark reddish-brown ; tendrils intermittent, frequently three in line, bifid or trifid. Leaves small; upper surface green, glossy, older leaves rugose; lower surface grayish-green, pubescent. Flowers self-fertile, late; stamens upright. Fruit early, keeps and ships well. Clusters small, tapering, usually single-shouldered, very compact. Berries small, round, pale red with thin bloom, persistent, firm; skin thin, tender, without pigment; flesh pale green, very juicy, tender, melting, fine-grained, vinous, sweet ; very good to best. Seeds free, small, broad, with enlarged neck, brown. PRENTISS (Labrusea, Vinifera) Prentiss is a green grape of high quality, once well known and generally recommended, but now going out of cultivation because the vine is tender to cold, lacks in vigor, is unpro- ductive, uncertain in bearing and is subject to rot and mildew. There are vineyards in which it does very well and in such it is a remarkably attractive green grape, especially in form of cluster and in color of berry, in these respects resembling the one-time favorite, Rebecca, although not so high in quality as that variety. Its season is given as both before and after Concord. Prentiss always must remain a variety for the amateur and for special localities. It originated with J. W. Prentiss, Pulteney, New York, about 1870 from seed of Isabella. Vine weak. Canes thick, light to dark brown; tendrils continuous, bifid. Leaves small, thick; upper surface light green, rugose in the VARIETIES OF GRAPES 429 older leaves; lower surface pale green, pubescent. Flowers self-fertile, mid-season; stamens upright. Fruit variable in season, about with Concord, keeps well. Cluster medium in size, tapering, sometimes with a single shoulder, compact. Berries medium in size, oval, light green with a yellow tinge, thin bloom, persistent, firm; skin tough, without pigment; flesh pale green, juicy, foxy; good. Seeds adherent, numerous, notched, short, sharp-pointed, dark brown. PURPLE CORNICHON (Vinifera) Black Cornichon By virtue of attractive appearance and excellent shipping qualities of the fruit, this variety takes high place among the commercial grapes of California. Late ripening is another quality making it desirable, while its curious, long, curved berries add novelty to its attractions. The fruit does not take high rank in quality. The description has been compiled. Vine very vigorous, healthy and productive; wood light brown striped with darker brown, short-jointed. Leaves large, longer than wide, deeply five-lobed; dark green above, lighter and very hairy below; coarsely toothed; with short, thick petiole. Bunches very large, loose or sometimes scraggly, borne on long peduncles; berries large, long, more or less curved, dark purple, spotted, thick-skinned, borne on long pedicels; flesh firm, crisp, sweet but not rich in flavor ; quality good but not high. Season late, keeps and ships well. REBECCA (Labrusea, Vinifera) In the middle of the last century, when grape-growing was in the hands of the connoisseurs, Rebecca was one of the sterling green varieties. It is wholly unsuited for commercial vine- yards and for years has been disappearing gradually from cultivation. The fruit is exceptionally fine, consisting of well- formed bunches and berries, the latter handsome yellowish- 430 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING white and semi-transparent. In quality, the grapes are of the best, with a rich, sweet flavor and pleasing aroma. But the vine characters condemn Rebecca for any but the amateur. The vines lack in hardiness and vigor, are susceptible to mildew and other fungi and are productive only under the best con- ditions. The original vine was an accidental seedling found in the garden of E. M. Peake, Hudson, New York, and bore its first fruit in 1852. Vine weak, sometimes vigorous, doubtfully hardy. Canes long, numerous, slender, dull brown, deepening in color at the nodes; tendrils continuous or intermittent, bifid or trifid. Leaves variable in size; upper surface dark green, dull, rugose; lower surface grayish-green, pubescent. Flowers self-fertile; stamens upright. Fruit late mid-season, ships and keeps well. Clusters small, short, cylindrical, rarely with a small, single shoulder, compact. Berries of medium size, oval, green with yellow tinge verging on amber, thin gray bloom, persistent, firm; skin thin, without pigment; flesh pale green, very juicy, tender, melting, vinous, a little foxy, sweet; good to very good. Seeds free, short, narrow, blunt, brown. Rep EAGLE (Labrusea, Vinifera) Red Eagle is a pure-bred seedling of Black Eagle which: it resembles in all characters except color of fruit. Vine and fruit exhibit the characters found in Rogers’ hybrids. It takes high rank as a grape of quality and can be recommended for the garden. The variety originated with 'T. V. Munson, Deni- son, Texas, and was sent out in 1888. Vine medium in vigor and hardiness, productive. Canes few, slen- der, dark brown with heavy bloom; nodes prominent, flattened ; tendrils continuous or intermittent, long, bifid. Leaves thick; upper surface light green, dull, rugose; lower surface grayish-green, pubes- cent; lobes three to five with terminus obtuse; petiolar sinus deep, narrow, sometimes closed and overlapping; basal sinus wide; lateral sinus deep, wide; teeth deep, wide. Flowers semi-fertile, late; stamens upright. VARIETIES OF GRAPES 431 Fruit early mid-season, keeps well. Clusters small, broad, taper- ing, single-shouldered, sometimes double-shouldered, loose with many abortive berries; pedicel very long, slender; brush green with brown tinge. Berries variable in size, round, light to very dark red with heavy bloom, persistent, soft; skin thick, tender, adherent with some red pigment; flesh green, transparent, juicy, very tender, melting, slightly foxy, tart; very good. Seeds free, one to five, large, long, blunt, light brown. REGAL (Labrusea, Vinifera) Regal is an offspring of Lindley, which it greatly resembles. The fruit is attractive in appearance and high in quality. A seemingly insignificant fault might make Regal undesirable in a commercial vineyard; the clusters are borne so close to the wood that it is difficult to harvest the fruit and avoid injury to the berries next to the wood. The variety is worthy of ex- tensive culture in vineyards and gardens. Regal originated with W. A. Woodward, Rockford, Illinois, in 1879. Vine vigorous, hardy, healthy, very productive. Canes interme- diate in length and size, numerous, dark reddish-brown. Tendrils intermittent, bifid or trifid. Leaves large; upper surface green, glossy and rugose; lower surface pale green with a bronze tinge, strongly pubescent. Flowers self-fertile, mid-season ; stamens upright. Fruit mid-season, keeps well. Clusters small, broad, cylindrical, usually with a short single shoulder, sometimes double-shouldered, very compact. Berries large, round, purplish-red with faint bloom, per- sistent. Skin thin, tough, without pigment. Flesh pale green, very juicy, fine-grained, tender, musky; good. Seeds free, numerous, long, narrow, notched, blunt with a short neck, brown. REQUA (Labrusea, Vinifera) This is one of Rogers’ hybrids which equals other grapes of its color and season. The grapes are attractive in cluster and berry and are of very good quality but are subject to rot and 432 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING ripen too late for northern regions. The variety was named Requa in 1869, it having been previously known as No. 28. Vine vigorous, hardy except in severe winters, medium in produc- tiveness. Canes long, thick; tendrils continuous or intermittent, trifid or bifid. Leaves medium in size, dark green, often thick and rugose; lower surface grayish-green, pubescent. Flowers semi-fertile, late; stamens reflexed. Fruit late, keeps long. Clusters large, cylindrical, often with a long, single shoulder, compact. Berries large, oval, dark, dull red covered with thin bloom, strongly adherent; skin thin, tough, ad- herent; flesh pale green, tender, stringy, vinous, foxy, sweet; good to very good. Seeds adherent, medium in size and length, broad, blunt. ROCHESTER (Labrusea, Vinifera) The fruit of Rochester is a large-clustered red grape, handsome and very good in quality. The vine is a strong grower, pro- ductive and free from diseases. The variety is difficult to propagate and, therefore, not in favor with nurserymen. The grapes are sweet, rich and vinous but should be used as soon as ripe, as they do not keep well and the berries quickly shatter from the bunch. As an attractive early red grape, Rochester is worth a place in the garden and in favored locations for a special market. Ellwanger and Barry, Rochester, New York, in 1867 grew Rochester from mixed seed of Delaware, Diana, Concord and Rebecca. Vine vigorous, hardy, productive. Canes long, dark reddish-brown ; nodes enlarged, flattened; internodes short; tendrils intermittent, long, bifid or trifid. Leaves large; upper surface light green, glossy, smooth; lower surface grayish-green, pubescent; lobes one to three with terminus acute; petiolar sinus deep; basal sinus absent; lateral sinus shallow; teeth shallow. Flowers fertile, mid-season; stamens upright. Fruit does not keep well. Clusters large, broad, tapering, usually single-shouldered, compact; pedicel short, slender with few warts; brush slender, yellowish-brown, Berries medium, oval, purplish-red, Pirate XXXII. — Wyoming (2). ee ee VARIETIES OF GRAPES 433 dull with thin, lilac bloom, drop from the pedicel, soft; skin thick, tough, inclined to crack, free, without pigment, astringent; flesh pale green, transparent, juicy, tender, fine-grained, vinous, sweet; good to very good. Seeds free, one to three, large, short, broad, dark brown. ROMMEL (Labrusea, Vulpina, Vinifera) Rommel is rarely cultivated in the North, because the vines lack in robustness, hardiness and productiveness and are sus- ceptible to the leaf-hopper; and the grapes do not attain high quality and crack as they ripen. The bunch and berry are attractive in form, size and color. At its best, Rommel is a good table-grape and makes a fine white wine. It is worth growing in the South. T. V. Munson, Denison, Texas, origi- nated Rommel in 1885, from seed of Elvira pollinated by Tri- umph, and introduced it in 1889. Vine vigorous in the South. Canes long, numerous, thick, reddish- brown, surface roughened ; nodes enlarged, often flattened ; internodes short; tendrils intermittent, long, bifid or trifid. Leaves medium in size, round, thick; upper surface light green, dull, rugose; lower sur- face pale green, free from pubescence but slightly hairy; leaf not lobed, terminus acute to acuminate; petiolar sinus deep, narrow, often closed and overlapping; basal sinus lacking; lateral sinus shallow when present; teeth deep. Flowers semi-fertile, late; stamens upright. Fruit mid-season, ships and keeps well. Clusters medium to short, broad, cylindrical, single-shouldered, compact ; pedicel slender, smooth ; brush short, pale green. Berries large, roundish, light green with a yellow tinge, glossy, persistent, firm; skin thin, cracks badly, tender, adherent, without pigment or astringency; flesh greenish, translucent, juicy, tender, melting, stringy, sweet; fair to good. Seeds free, one to four, broad, sharp-pointed, plump, brown. Rosak1I (Vinifera) Rosaki is a table- and raisin-grape of southeastern Europe and Asia Minor. According to some of the California nursery 2F 434 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING companies, it is grown in that state under the name Dattier de Beyrouth, although it would seem from French descriptions that there is a separate, very late variety of the latter name. Rosaki is similar to Malaga and there is a possibility that in some of the warmer parts of the East, it may be grown commer- clally as a substitute for the latter. The variety seems to be little grown on the Pacific slope. Vines vigorous, usually very productive. Leaves large, roundish, rugose, usually five-lobed; terminal lobe acuminate; petiolar sinus moderately deep to deep, medium broad; lower lateral sinus shallow, broad, occasionally lacking; upper lateral sinus shallow to medium, broad; margins broadly and bluntly dentate. Fruit ripens the third week in October, keeping qualities excellent; clusters large, loose, tapering, shouldered; berries large to very large, oval to long-oval, pale yellow-green; flesh translucent, tender, meaty, vinous, sprightly ; quality good to very good. Rose oF PERU (Vinifera) Rose of Peru is a favorite table-grape in California, confused with and possibly the same as Black Prince. Its chief com- mendable characters are handsome appearance and high quality of fruit and very productive vines. It is not adapted for shipping and does not enter plentifully into commerce. Its season is so late that the variety is hardly worth trying in the East, and yet it has matured in favorable seasons at Geneva, New York. The following description is com- piled : Vine vigorous, healthy, productive; wood short-jointed, dark brown. Leaves of medium size; deep green above, lighter green and tomentose below. Bunches very large, shouldered, very loose, often seraggly; berry large, round, black with firm, crackling flesh ; skin rather thin and tender; flavor sweet and rich; quality very good to best. Season late, keeping rather well but not shipping well: VARIETIES OF GRAPES 435 SALEM (Labrusea, Vinifera) Rogers’ No. 22, Rogers’ No. 53 Salem (Plate X XVII) is the one of Rogers’ hybrids of which the originator is said to have thought most, and to which he gave the name of his place of residence. The two chief faults, unproductiveness and susceptibility to mildew, are not found in all localities, and in these districts, near good markets, Salem ought to rank high as a commercial fruit. The vine is hardy, vigorous and productive and bears handsome fruit of high quality. This variety was christened Salem by Rogers in 1867, two years earlier than his other hybrids were named. Vine vigorous, hardy, variable in productiveness. Canes long, dark brown; nodes enlarged ; tendrils continuous or intermittent, long, bifid or trifid. Leaves variable in size; upper surface dark green, dull; lower surface pale green with slight bronze tinge, pubescent ; lobes one to three with terminus acute; petiolar sinus deep, narrow, often overlapping; basal sinus lacking; lateral sinus shallow, narrow, notched. Flowers sterile, mid-season; stamens reflexed. Fruit early, keeps and ships well. Clusters large, short, broad, tapering, heavily shouldered, compact; pedicel short, thick with small warts, enlarged at point of attachment to berry; brush short, pale green. Berries large, round, dark red, dull, persistent, soft; skin thick, adherent, without pigment, astringent; flesh translucent, juicy, tender, stringy, fine-grained, vinous, sprightly; good to very good. Seeds one to six, large, long and broad, blunt, brown. SCUPPERNONG (Rotundifolia) American Muscadine, Bull, Bullace, Bullet, Fox Grape, Green Scuppernong, Green Muscadine, Hickman, Muscadine, Roanoke Scuppernong is preéminently the grape of the South, the chief representative of the great species, V. rotundifolia, which 436 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING runs riot in natural luxuriance from Delaware and Maryland to the Gulf and westward from the Atlantic to Arkansas and Texas. Scuppernong vines are found on arbors, in gardens, or half wild, on trees and fences on nearly every farm in the South Atlantic states. As a rule, these vines receive little cultivation, are unpruned and are given no care of any kind; but even under neglect they produce large crops. The vines are almost immune to mildew, rot, phylloxera, or other fungal or insect pests; they give not only an abundance of fruit but on arbors and trellises are much prized for their shade and beauty. The fruit, to a palate accustomed to other grapes, is not very acceptable, having a musky flavor and a somewhat repugnant odor, which, however, with familiarity becomes quite agreeable. The pulp is sweet and juicy but is lacking in sprightliness. The grapes are not suitable for the market since the berries drop from the bunch in ripening and become more or less smeared with juice so that their appearance is not appetizing. Vine vigorous, not hardy in the North, very productive. Canes long, numerous, slender, ash-gray to grayish-brown; surface smooth, thickly covered with small, light brown dots; tendrils intermittent, simple. Leaves small, thin; upper surface light green, smooth; lower surface very pale green, pubescent along the ribs; veins inconspicuous. Flowers very late; stamens reflexed. Fruit late, ripens unevenly, berries drop as they mature. Clusters small, round, unshouldered, loose. Berries few in a cluster, large, round, dull green, often with brown tinge, firm; skin thiek, tough with many small russet dots; flesh pale green, juicy, tender, soft, fine-grained, foxy, sweet to agreeably tart; fair to good. Seeds ad- herent, large, short, broad, unnotched, blunt, plump, surface smooth, brown. SECRETARY (Vinifera, Vulpina, Labrusca) Injured by mildew and rot which attack leaves, fruit and young wood, the vines of Secretary are able to produce good grapes only in exceptional seasons and in favored localities. VARIETIES OF GRAPES 437 The fruit characters of Secretary, however, give the grapes exceptionally high quality, the berries being meaty yet juicy, fine-grained and tender, with a sweet, spicy, vinous flavor. The bunches are large, well-formed, with medium-sized, pur- plish-black berries covered with thick bloom, making a very handsome cluster. While the vine and foliage somewhat resemble those of Clinton, one of its parents, the variety is not _ nearly as hardy, vigorous nor productive. Moreover, in any but favored localities in the North, its maturity is somewhat uncertain. These defects keep Secretary from becoming of commercial importance and make it of value only to the amateur. Secretary is one of the first productions of J. H. Ricketts, Newburgh, New York, the original vine coming from seed of Clinton fertilized by Muscat Hamburg, planted in 1867. Vine vigorous, doubtfully hardy, variable in productiveness. Canes numerous, light brown, conspicuously darker at nodes, surface ecvered with thin, blue bloom; tendrils intermittent, bifid. Leaves small to medium, thin; upper surface light green, dull, smooth; lower surface pale green, glabrous. Flowers semi-fertile, early; stamens upright. Fruit ripens after Concord, keeps and ships well. Clusters large, long, cylindrical with a large, single shoulder, often loose and with many abortive fruits. Berries large, round, flattened at attachment to pedicel, dark purplish-black, glossy, persistent, firm; skin tough with wine-colored pigment; flesh green, juicy, fine-grained, tender, vinous, sweet; good. Seeds free, large, broad, notched, long, dark brown. SENASQUA (Labrusea, Vinifera) The vine of Senasqua lacks in vigor, hardiness, productiveness and health. The grapes are of good quality, and when well grown are up to the average fruits of the Labrusca-Vinifera hybrids. Unfortunately the berries have a tendency to crack which is aggravated by the bunches being so compact as to crowd the berries. Senasqua is one of the latest grapes to open its buds and is, therefore, seldom injured by late frosts. It 438 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING can be recommended only for the garden for the sake of variety. Stephen W. Underhill of Crown Point, New York, originated Senasqua from seed of Concord pollinated by Black Prince. Vine weak and tender, often unproductive. Canes short, few, red- dish-brown; nodes enlarged, flattened; tendrils intermittent, long, trifid or bifid. Leaves light green, glossy, rugose; lower surface whitish-green, pubescent; leaf usually not lobed with terminus acute; petiolar sinus narrow; basal and lateral sinuses shallow and narrow when present. Flowers fertile, late; stamens upright. Fruit a little later than Concord, keeps well. Clusters large, broad, ~ irregularly tapering, usually with a small, single shoulder, very com- pact; pedicel thick, smooth, enlarged at point of attachment; brush short, reddish. Berries large, round, reddish-black, persistent, firm ; skin thick, tender, cracks, adherent, contains some wine-colored pig- ment; flesh green, translucent, juicy, tender, meaty, vinous, spicy ; good. Seeds free, one to five, long, narrow, one-sided, light brown. SULTANA (Vinifera) This variety was formerly the standard seedless grape in California for home use and raisins, but it is now outstripped by Sultanina. Sultana is possibly better flavored than Sultanina but the vines are hardly as vigorous or productive and the berries often have seeds. The description is compiled. Vines vigorous, upright, productive. Leaves large, five-lobed, with large sinuses, light in color, coarsely toothed. Bunches large, long, cylindrical, heavily shouldered, sometimes not well filled, often loose and seraggly; berries small, round, firm and crisp, golden- yellow, sweet with considerable piquancy ; quality good. SULTANINA (Vinifera) Thompson’s Seedless Sultanina is one of the standard seedless grapes of the Pacific slope, grown both to eat out of hand and for raisins. Probably VARIETIES OF GRAPES 439 it can be grown in home plantations in favored parts of eastern America where the season is long and warm. The following description is compiled from Californian viticulturists : Vine very vigorous, very productive; trunk large with very long eanes. Leaves glabrous on both sides, dark yellow-green above, light below; generally three-lobed, with shallow sinuses; teeth short and obtuse. Bunch large, conico-cylindrical, well filled, with her- baceous peduncles; berries oval, beautiful golden-yellow color; skin moderately thick; flesh of rather neutral flavor; very good. TAYLOR (Vulpina, Labrusea) Bullitt While it is from the species to which Taylor belongs that we must look for our hardiest vines, nevertheless this grape and its offspring, although not tender to cold, do best in southern regions, as they require a long warm summer to mature prop- erly. The quality of the fruit of Taylor is fair to good, the flavor being sweet, pure, delicate and spicy and the flesh tender and juicy; but the bunches are small and the flowers are in- fertile so that the berries do not set well, making very imperfect and unsightly clusters. The skin is such, also, that it cracks badly, a defect seemingly transmitted to many of the seedlings of the variety. The vine is strong, healthy, hardy but not very productive. The original vine of Taylor was a wild seedling found in the early part of the last century on the Cumberland Mountains near the Kentucky-Tennessee line by a Mr. Cobb. Vine vigorous to rank, healthy, hardy, variable in productiveness. Leaves small, attractive in color, smooth. Flowers bloom early; stamens reflexed. Fruit ripens about two weeks before Isabella. Clusters small to medium, shouldered, loose or moderately compact. Berries small to medium, roundish, pale greenish-white, sometimes tinged with amber; skin very thin; pulp sweet, spicy; fair to good in quality. 440 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING TRIUMPH (Labrusea, Vinifera) When quality, color, shape and size of bunch and berry are considered, Triumph (Plate XXVIII) is one of the finest dessert grapes of America. At its best, it is a magnificent bunch of golden grapes of highest quality, esteemed even in southern Europe where it must compete with the best of the Viniferas. In America, however, its commercial importance is curtailed by the fact that the fruit requires a long season for proper develop- ment. ‘Triumph has, in general, the vine characters of the Labrusca parent, Concord, especially its habit of growth, vigor, productiveness and foliage characters, falling short in hardiness, resistance to fungal diseases and earliness of fruit, the fruit maturing with or a little later than Catawba. While the vine characters of Triumph are those of Labrusca, there is scarcely a suggestion of the coarseness, or of the foxy odor and taste of Labrusca, and the objectionable seeds, pulp and skin of the native grape give way. to the far less objectionable structures of Vinifera. The flesh is tender and melting and the flavor rich, sweet, vinous, pure and delicate. The skins of the berries under unfavorable conditions crack badly, the variety, therefore, neither shipping nor keeping well. ‘Triumph was grown soon after the Civil War by George W. Campbell, Delaware, Ohio, from seed of Concord fertilized by Chassalas Musque. Vine vigorous. Canes long, dark brown with much bloom; nodes enlarged; tendrils intermittent, long, trifid, sometimes bifid. Leaves large; upper surface light green, dull, rugose; lower surface grayish- white, pubescent ; leaf usually not lobed with terminus obtuse; petiolar sinus deep, narrow, often closed and overlapping; basal sinus absent ; lateral sinus shallow and narrow when present; teeth deep, wide. Flowers self-fertile, late; stamens upright. Fruit very late. Clusters very large, long, broad, cylindrical, sometimes single-shouldered, compact; pedicel slender, smooth; brush short, yellowish-green. Berries medium in size, oval, golden yellow, glossy with heavy bloom, persistent, firm; skin thin, inclined to crack, VARIETIES OF GRAPES 441 adherent, without pigment, slightly astringent; flesh light green, translucent, juicy, fine-grained, tender, vinous; good to very good. Seeds free, one to five, small, brown. ULSTER (Labrusea, Vinifera) The vines of Ulster set too much fruit in spite of efforts to control the crop by pruning; two undesirable results follow, the bunches are small and the vines, lacking vigor at best, fail to recover from the overfruitfulness. These defects keep the variety from becoming of importance commercially or even a favorite as a garden grape. The quality of the fruit is very good, being much like that of Catawba, and under favorable conditions it is an attractive green with a red tinge. The fruit keeps well when the variety is grown under conditions suited to it. Ulster originated with A. J. Caywood, Marlboro, New York, and was introduced by him about 1885. Its parents are said to be Catawba pollinated by a wild Aésti- valis. Both vine and fruit show traces of Labrusca and Vinifera, but the A#stivalis characters, if present, are not apparent. Vine hardy, productive, overbears. Canes short, slender, dark brown, surface roughened and covered with faint pubescence; nodes enlarged and flattened; internodes short; tendrils intermittent, bifid, dehisce early. Leaves small, thick; upper surface light green, glossy, smooth; lower surface grayish-white, pubescent; leaf usually not lobed with terminus acute; petiolar sinus medium to wide; basal sinus absent; lateral sinus a notch when present; teeth shallow, wide. Flowers self-fertile, early ; stamens upright. Fruit late mid-season. Clusters long, cylindrical, often single-~ shouldered, compact; pedicel slender, with numerous warts ; brush short, yellowish-green. Berries medium in size, round, dark dull red with thin bloom, persistent; skin thick, tough, adherent, astringent ; flesh pale green, translucent, juicy, tender, fine-grained, faintly aro- matic, slightly foxy; good to very good. Seeds free, one to six, medium in size, plump, brown. 442 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING VERDAL (Vinifera) Aspiran Blanc Verdal is one of the standard late grapes of the Pacific slope, ripening among the last. The grapes are seen seldom in distant markets and the quality is not quite good enough to make it a very great favorite for home plantations. Vigor and hardiness of vines commend it as do the large and handsome fruits, and these qualities, with late ripening, will probably long keep it on grape lists in the far West. The description is compiled. Vines vigorous, hardy, healthy and productive; canes rather slender, half ereet. Leaves of medium size, glabrous on both surfaces, except below near the axis of the main nerve; sinuses well marked and generally closed, giving the leaf the appearance of having five holes; teeth long, unequal, acuminate. Bunches large to very large, irregu- lar, long-coniecal, usually compact; shoulders small or lacking; berries large or very large, yellowish-green; skin thick but tender; flesh erisp, firm; flavor agreeable but not rich; quality good. Season very late, keeping and shipping well. VERGENNES (Labrusea) The most valuable attribute of Vergennes (Plate XXIX) is certainty in bearing. The vine seldom fails to bear although it often overbears, causing variability in size of fruits and time of ripening. With a moderate crop, the grapes ripen with Con- eord, but with a heavy load from one to two weeks later. Vergennes is somewhat unpopular with vinevardists because of the sprawling habit of the vines which makes them untract- able for vineyard operations; this fault is obviated by grafting on other vines. The grapes are attractive, the quality is good, flavor agreeable, the flesh tender, and seeds and skin are not objectionable. Vergennes is the standard late-keeping grape VARIETIES OF GRAPES 443 for northern regions, being very common in the markets as late as January. The original vine was a chance seedling in the garden of William E. Greene, Vergennes, Vermont, in 1874. Vine variable in vigor, doubtfully hardy, productive, healthy. Canes long, dark brown; nodes enlarged, strongly flattened; tendrils continuous, long, bifid or trifid. Leaves large, thin; upper surface light green, glossy, rugose; lower surface pale green, very pubescent ; leaf usually not lobed with terminus broadly acute ; petiolar sinus wide ; teeth shallow. Flowers semi-sterile, mid-season; stamens upright. Fruit late, keeps and ships well. Clusters of medium size, broad, cylindrical, sometimes single-shouldered, loose; pedicel with numerous small warts; brush slender, short, pale green. Berries large, oval, light and dark red with thin bloom, persistent; skin thick, tough, adherent, astringent; flesh pale green, juicy, fine-grained, somewhat stringy, tender, vinous; good to very good. Seeds free, one to five, blunt, brown. WALTER (Vinifera, Labrusea, Bourquiniana) Were it not almost impossible to grow healthy vines of Walter, the variety would rank high among American grapes. But stuntedsby fungi which attack leaves, young wood and fruit, it is possible only in exceptionally favorable seasons satisfactorily to produce crops of this variety. Besides susceptibility to diseases, the vines are fastidious to soils, everywhere variable in growth and are injured in cold winters. As if to atone for the faults of the vine, the fruit of Walter is almost perfect, lacking only in size of bunch and berry. The bunch and berry resemble those of Delaware, but the fruit is not as high in quality as that of its parents. Walter is adapted to conditions under which Delaware thrives. A. J. Caywood, Modena, New York, grew this variety about 1850 from seed of Delaware pollinated by Diana. Vine vigorous. Canes medium in length and size, dark reddish- brown with thin bloom; nodes enlarged, flattened; tendrils intermit- tent, bifid. Leaves thick; upper surface dark green, glossy, smooth ; 444 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING lower surface tinged with bronze, heavily pubescent; lobes one to three with terminus acute; petiolar sinus narrow; basal sinus lacking; lat- eral sinus a notch if present. Flowers mid-season; stamens upright. Fruit early, keeps and ships well. Clusters medium in size, broad, cylindrical, usually single-shouldered, compact; pedicel slender, with small, scattering warts; brush short, slender, green with brown tinge. Berries small, ovate, red, glossy with thin bloom, persistent, firm; skin very tough, adheres slightly, unpigmented; flesh pale green, translucent, juicy, tough, somewhat foxy, vinous, aromatic; good to very good. Seeds adherent, one to four, small, sharp-pointed, light brown. WILDER (Labrusea, Vinifera) The fruit of Wilder is surpassed in quality and appearance by other of Rogers’ hybrids, but the vine is the most reliable of any of these hybrid sorts, being vigorous, hardy, productive, and, although somewhat susceptible to mildew, as healthy as any. Wilder is not as well known in the markets as it should be, and now that fungal diseases can be controlled by spraying should be more commonly planted in commercial vineyards, especially for local markets. Wilder is one of the fgrty-five Labrusca-Vinifera hybrids raised by E. S. Rogers, Salem, Mas- sachusetts, having been described first in 1858. Vine vigorous, hardy, productive, susceptible to mildew. Canes long, numerous, reddish-brown, darker at the nodes; internodes long ; tendrils intermittent, bifid or trifid. Leaves large, irregularly round ; upper surface dark green, glossy, smooth; lower surface pale green, pubescent; usually not lobed with terminus acute; petiolar sinus deep, narrow, often closed and overlapping; basal sinus lacking; lateral sinus shallow, narrow, or a mere notch when present. Flowers self-sterile, mid-season; stamens reflexed. Fruit early mid-season, keeps and ships well. Clusters variable in size, short, broad, tapering, heavily single-shouldered, loose ; pedicel long, thick with numerous warts; brush thick, green with tinge of red. Berries large, oval, purplish-black with heavy bloom, persistent, firm ; skin thick, adherent to pulp, with bright red pigment, astringent ; flesh green, translucent, juicy, tender; good. Seeds adherent, one to five, long, light brown. VARIETIES OF GRAPES 445 WINCHELL (Labrusea, Vinifera, Austivalis) Green Mountain The vines of Winchell (Plate XXX) are vigorous, hardy, healthy, productive, and the fruit is early, of high quality and ships well—altogether a most admirable early grape. There are some minor faults which become drawbacks in the culture of Winchell. The berries, and under some conditions the bunches, are small and the bunch is loose with a large shoulder. Some- times this looseness becomes so pronounced as to give a strag- eling, poorly-formed cluster ; and the shoulder, when as large as the cluster itself, which often happens, makes the cluster un- sightly. The grapes shell when fully ripe, a serious fault. Again, while the crop usually ripens evenly, there are seasons when two pickings are needed because of the unevenness in ripening. Lastly, the skin is thin and there is danger in un- favorable seasons of the berries cracking, although this is seldom a serious fault. These defects do not offset the several good characters of Winchell which make it the standard early green grape, deserving to rank with the best early grapes of any color. The original vine was raised by James Milton Clough, Stamford, Vermont, about 1850 from seed of an un- known purple grape. Vine vigorous, hardy, healthy, very productive. Canes long, nu- merous, slender, dark brown with thin bloom; nodes enlarged, flat- tened; tendrils continuous, sometimes intermittent, bifid. Leaves large; upper surface light green, glossy, smooth; lower surface dull green, tinged with bronze, faintly pubescent; lobes three to five with terminal lobe acute; petiolar sinus deep; basal sinus shallow; teeth shallow, wide. Flowers fertile, mid-season; stamens upright. Fruit early, keeps and ships well. Clusters long, slender, cylindri- eal, often with a long shoulder, compact; pedicel short, slender with few inconspicuous warts; brush greenish-white. Berries small, round, light green, persistent, soft; skin marked with small, reddish- 446 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING brown spots, thin, tender, slightly astringent; flesh green, translucent, juicy, tender, fine-grained, sweet; very good to best. Seeds free, one to four, small, plump, wide and long, blunt, brown. WoopDRUFF (Labrusea, Vinifera ?) Woodruff is a handsome, showy, brick-red grape with large clusters and berries, but its taste belies its looks, for the flesh is coarse and the flavor poor. The variety would not be worth attention were it not for its excellent vine characters; the vines are hardy, productive and healthy. The grapes ripen a little before Concord and come on the market at a favorable time, especially for a red grape. Woodruff originated from C. H. Woodruff, Ann Arbor, Michigan, as a chance seedling which came up in 1874 and fruited first in 1877. Vine very vigorous, hardy. Canes dark brown; nodes enlarged, flattened; tendrils continuous, bifid or trifid. Leaves round; upper surface light green, dull, rugose; lower surface greenish-white, pubes- cent; leaf usually not lobed with terminus acute; petiolar sinus wide ; basal sinus lacking; lateral sinus shallow and narrow when present; teeth shallow. Flowers semi-fertile, early; stamens upright. Fruit ripening before Concord. Clusters broad, widely tapering, usually single-shouldered, compact; pedicel short, thick, smooth; brush long, pale green. Berries large, round, dark red, dull, firm; skin thin, tender, adherent, slightly astringent; flesh pale green, trans- lucent, juicy, tough, coarse, very foxy; fair in quality. Seeds ad- herent, one to five, broad, short, plump, blunt, brown, WorDEN (Labrusea) Of the many offspring of Concord, Worden (Plate XXXI) is best known and most meritorious. The grapes differ chiefly from those of Concord in having larger berries and bunches, in having better quality and in being a week to ten days earlier. VARIETIES OF GRAPES 447 The vine is equally hardy, healthy, vigorous and productive but is more fastidious in its adaptations to soil, although now and then it does even better. The chief fault of the variety is that the fruit cracks badly, often preventing the profitable marketing of acrop. Besides this tenderness of skin, the fruit-pulp of Worden is softer than that of Concord, there is more juice, and the keeping qualities are not as good, so that the grapes hardly ship as well as those of the more commonly grown grape. Worden is very popular in northern grape regions both for com- mercial plantations and the garden. It is a more desirable inhabitant of the garden, because of higher quality of fruit than Concord, and under conditions well suited to it is better as a commercial variety, as the fruit is handsomer as well as of better quality. In the markets the fruit ought to sell for a higher price than Concord if desired for immediate consumption, and if it can be harvested promptly, as it does not hang well on the vines. Its earlier season is against it for a commercial variety and, with the defects mentioned, will prevent its taking the place of Concord to a great degree. Worden was originated by Schuyler Worden, Minetto, Oswego County, New York, from seed of Concord planted about 1863. Vine vigorous, hardy, healthy, productive. Canes large, thick, dark brown with reddish tinge; nodes enlarged, flattened; tendrils continuous, slender, bifid, sometimes trifid. Young leaves tinged on the under side and along the margins of upper side with rose- earmine. Leaves large, thick; upper surface dark green, glossy, smooth; lower surface light bronze, pubescent; leaf usually not lobed; petiolar sinus wide, often urnshaped; teeth shallow. Flowers fertile, mid-season; stamens upright. Fruit early. Clusters large, long, broad, tapering, usually single- shouldered, compact; pedicel slender with a few small warts; brush long, light green. Berries large, round, dark purplish-black, glossy with heavy bloom, firm; skin tender, cracks badly, adheres slightly, contains dark red pigment, astringent. Flesh green, translucent, juicy, fine-grained, tough, foxy, sweet, mild; good to very good. Seeds adherent, one to five, large, broad, short, blunt, brown. 448 MANUAL OF AMERICAN GRAPE-GROWING WYOMING (Labrusea) Hopkins Early Red, Wilmington Red, Wyoming Red Such value as Wyoming (Plate XXXII) possesses lies in the hardiness, productiveness and healthiness of the vine. The ap- pearance of the fruit is very good, the bunches are well formed and composed of rich amber-colored berries of medium size. The quality, however, is poor, being that of the wild Labrusca in foxiness of flavor and in flesh characters. It is not nearly as valuable as some other of the red Labruscas hitherto described and can hardly be recommended either for the garden or the vineyard. Wyoming was introduced by S. J. Parker of Ithaca, New York, who states that it came from Pennsylvania in 1861. Vine vigorous, hardy, healthy, productive. Canes numerous, slender, dark reddish-brown covered with blue bloom; nodes enlarged, frequently flattened; tendrils continuous, short, bifid. Leaves of average size and thickness; upper surface light green, dull, smooth; lower surface dull green with tinge of bronze, pubescent; lobes one to three with terminus acute; petiolar sinus shallow, wide; basal sinus usually wanting; lateral sinus shallow and wide when present; teeth shallow. Flowers sterile, mid-season; stamens reflexed. Fruit early, keeps well. Clusters slender, cylindrical, compact ; pedicel short, slender with small warts; brush slender, pale green with brown tinge. Berries medium, round, rich amber red with thin bloom, persistent, firm; skin tender, adherent, astringent; flesh pale green, translucent, juicy, tough, solid, strongly foxy, vinous; poor in quality. Seeds adherent, one to three, slightly notched, ight brown. INDEX (Names of species, and synonyms of varietal names, are in italics.) Actoni, 330. Adaptations of stocks, 66. Adlum, John, mentioned, 58. Admirable, 373. Adoxus obscurus, 216. Aestivalis grapes, 11. Affinity of stock and cion, 67. Agawam, 331. Air currents, 27. Alabama, 401. Alexander, 5, 6. Alexander, 391. Alicante, for forcing, 198. Alleys, 75. Almeria, 331. Amadas & Barlowe, mentioned, 5. America, 332. American Muscadine, 435. Aminia, 333. Anaheim disease, 226. Anthony, on grafting, 47. Anthracnose, control of, 223. description of, 223. Aramon X Rupestris, 2, 64. Arbors, training vines on, 142. Arkansas, 345, 357. Arnold’s Hybrid, 422. Aspiran Blanc, 442. August Giant, 333. Bacchus, 324. Bagging grapes, 293. cost of, 294. Bakator, 335. Barbarossa, for forcing, 197. Bark, structure of, 303. Barry, 335. Bartram, on the Alexander, 7. 2G Beach Grape, 313. Beacon, 336. Beaconsfield, 346. Beak defined, 308. Bench grafting, 50. essentials of, 50. ' operation of, 51. preparing cuttings for, 51. Berckmans, 337. Berry, characters of, 308. Bioletti, on callusing beds, 56. on grafting, 48, 52. on pruning in California, 151. on resistant stocks, 63. quoted, 18. Bird Grape, 312. Bitter-rot, 225. Black Cape, 391. Black Cornichon, 429. Black Eagle, 338. Black El Paso, 401. Black German, 406. Black Hamburg, for forcing, 197. Black July, 401. Black Malvoise, 339. Black Morocco, 339. Black Muscat, 415. Black rot, control of, 320. description of, 319. Black Spanish, 401. Bloom defined, 301. Blooming dates of grapes, 288. Blooming, time of, 305. Blue French, 401. Blue Grape, 318, 322. Borders in graperies, making, 195. care of, 195, Bottsi, 382. 449 450 Bowed canes, 174. Branches defined, 301. Brighton, 340. Brilliant, 341. Brown, 342. Brown French, 382. Brush defined, 307. Buckland Sweetwater, for forcing, 197. Buds, characters of, 304. defined, 304. Bull, 435. Bull, Ephraim W., mentioned, 9. Bull Grape, 310. Bullace, 435. Bullace Grape, 310. Bullet, 435. Bullet Grape, 310. Bullitt, 439. Bunch Grape, 318. Burgundy, 401. Bush Grape, 312. Bushy Grape, 310. By-products of the grape, 269. Callusing bed, 56. Campbell Early, 342. Canada, 348. Canadian Hamburg, 422. Canadian Hybrid, 422. Canandaigua, 344. Canandaigua Lake grape region, 21. Cane-renewal, 116. Canes, characters of, 303. defined, 301. disposition of, in pruning, 124. Care of young vines, 87. Carman, 344. Catawba, 345. history of, 8. Catawba Tokay, 345. Catch crops, 89, 90. Cato, on grafting, 45. quoted, 76. Cayuga Lake grape region, 21. Central Lake grape region, 20. Chalaza defined, 308. Champagne, 253. Champagne industry, 21. Champion, 346. Chasselas Golden, 347. Chasselas Doré, 347. IN DEX Chasselas Rose, 348. Chautauqua, 348. Chautauqua grape-belt, 18. Chautauqua training, 125. Cherokee, 345. Chicken Grape, 317, 318. Cigar Box Grape, 401. Clevener, 349. Climate and grape-growing, 23. Clinton, 15, 350. Colerain, 351. Columbian Imperial, 351. Columbian Jumbo, 351. Commercial factors, 30. Concord, 352. history of, 9. Constantia, 391. Coéperative fertilizer 102. Cordon pruning, 153. Cordons, horizontal, 176. vertical, 175. Cottage, 354. Coulure, 226. Cover-crops, 89, 91. Craponius inequalis, 217. Cream of tartar, 270. Cross-pollination, 284. Croton, 355. Crown-gall, 225. Cryptosporella viticola, 224. Cunningham, 356. Cuttings, dormant, 38. hard-wood, 38. herbaceous, 42. planting, 39. single-eye, 40. time to make, 38. Cutting wood, selecting, 38. Cut-worms on grapes, 315. Cynthiana, 357. experiments, Dead-arm disease, control of, 324. description of, 324. Delaware, 11, 358. Depth to plant, 86. Desmia funeralis, 216. Determinants of grape regions, 22. Devereaux, 401. Diamond, 359. Diana, 360. INDEX Diaphragm, characters of, 303. defined, 301: Digging holes, 83. Direct producers, 71. Direction of rows, 74. Distances in planting, 75. Dodrelabi, 379. Dorchester, 391. Double-headed vines, 174. Double Kniffin, 135 Downing, 361. Downy mildew, control of, 222, description of, 220. Dracut Amber, 362. Drainage for grapes, 28, 77. Duck-shot Grape, 318. Dunn, 382. Dutchess, 362. Dynamite in digging holes, 84. Early Champion, 346. Early Daisy, 363. Early Ohio, 364. Early Victor, 364. Eaton, 365. Eclipse, 366. Eden, 367. Egg Harbor grape region, Eldorado, 368. Elvira, 369. Emasculating grape-flowers, 279. Emperor, 369. Empire State, 370. Etta, 371. Eumelan, 371. European grapes, in eastern America, 184. grafting, 186. varieties for eastern America, 191. Everbearing Grape, 312. Exposures for grapes, 34. 99 mee Factors limiting yield, 105. Faith, 372. Fall Grape, 318. Fancher, 345. Fan-training, 131. Feher Szagos, 373. Fern, 373. Fern Munson, 373. ° Fertilizers, applying; 106. 451. Fertiizers, — Continued. effects on leaves, 102. effects on vines, 102: effects on yield, 101, 102 experiment, 98. necessity of, 97. when needed, 106. Fidia viticida, 206. Fitting land, 78. Flame Tokay, 374. Flesh, characters of, 308. Florida Grape, 312. Flowers, 373. Flower, characters of, 305. Fontainebleau, 347. Fox Grape, 317, 324. Fox Grape, 435. Fox grapes, cultivation of, 7. Foxiness defined, 307. French Grape, 358. Frost Grape, 317. Frosts and grape-growing, 25. Fruit-bearing, manner of, 113. Fruit, characters of, 307. parts of, 307. Fungi, determinants of grape regions, 29. Fungous diseases of the grape, 218. Gaertner, 375. Geneva, 376. Gibbs Grape, 391. Gladwin, on Chautauqua training, 126. on Keuka training, 129. on vineyard returns, 248. Glomerella rufomacullans, 225. ““Go-devil,’”’ 119. Goethe, 377. Gold Coin, 377. Golden Chasselas, 424. Grading grapes, 235. Grading land, 78. Grafting, 45. at New York Station, 46. bundling grafts after, 55. essentials of, 45. European grapes, 186. rooted cuttings, 56. Grafted vineyards, care of, 48. Grafting wax, 54. 452 Grafts, care of, in nursery, 58. number made per hour, 56. Grape, botany of, 300. by-products of, 269. domestication of, 1. habitats of, 4. habits of growth of, 302. mutations in the, 60. number of species of, 1. organs of, 300. pests of, 204. products, 250. Grape-berry moth, control of, 215. life history of, 213. Grape-breeding, 273. results of, 282. Grape-curculio, 217. Grape hawk-moth, 217. Grape-hybrids, 274. Grape-juice, commercial making, 258. development of industry, 257. making at home, 262. regions in which made, 257. Grape leaf-folder, 216. Grape leaf-hopper, control of, 213. life history of, 211. Grape regions, determinants of, 16. in California, 18. Grape root-worm, Californian, 216. eastern, control of, 206. life history of, 206. Grape seedlings, 37. Graperies, 193. borders in, 195. care of vines in, 201. construction of, 193. essentials of, 194. heating, 194. varieties for, 196. ventilating, 194, 202. watering, 202. Grapes, American, 4. classified as to self-fertility, 296. domestic use of, 271. European, 2. forcing, 194. immunity to disease, 303. immunity to insects, 303. propagation of, 37. under glass, 192. Grape-vinegar, 269. INDEX Grape-vine root-borer, 217. Grape-vine flea-beetle, control of, 209. life history of, 208. Greeley, Horace, mentioned, 9. Green Early, 378. Green Mountain, 445. Green Scuppernong, 435. Grein Golden, 378. Grizzly Frontignan, for forcing, 197. Gros Colman, 379. for forcing, 197. Guignardia Bidwellii, 220. Haltica chalybea, 209. Hardiness of grapes, 302. Hartford, 380. Hartzell, mentioned, 213. Harvesting, in California, 243. in the East, 230. Museadine grapes, 240. Hawkins, Captain John, mentioned, 5 Hayes, 381. Heading-back canes, 116. Headlight, 281. Heart-leaved Vitis, 317. Heating vineyards, 25. Heeling-in vines, 82. Helene, 391. Herbaceous cuttings, 42. Herbemont, 12, 382. Herbert, 383. Hercules, 384. Hermann grape region, 22. Hickman, 435. Hicks, 285. Hidalgo, 385. Highland, 386. Hilgarde, 373. Hilum defined, 308. Hopkins, 387. Hopkins Early Red, 448. Horizontal cordons, 176. Hosford, 388. Hudson horizontal training, 141. Hudson River grape region, 21. Humidity in grape-growing, 25. Hunt, 382. Husmann, on making grape-juice, 258. on raisin-making, 264. INDEX 453 ’ Husmann & Dearing, on harvesting | Lady Washington, 400. Museadine grapes, 240. Lake Erie grape region, 22. on pruning Muscadine grapes, 143. Laterals defined, 301. Hybrid Franc, 388. Lawton grape region, 22. Hybridizing grapes, 278. Layering, 42. Hybrids, secondary, 276. dormant wood, 43. essentials of, 43. Ideal, 389. green wood, 44. Improved Kniffin, 135. to fill vacancies, 44. Inflorescences, number of, in species, | Laying down vines, 295. 304. Laying out vineyards, 74. Insect pests, 204. — Leaf-margins, characters of, 307. Insects as determinants of grape re-| Leaf, characters of, 307. gions, 29. parts of, 306. Internodes defined, 301. Lebanon, 345. Tona, 390. Legaux, Peter, mentioned, 7. Trrigation, 95. Leif the Lucky, mentioned, 5. Isabella, 390. Lenoir, 13, 401. Isabella, 391. Lignan Blanc, 403. Isabella Seedling, 392. Lime, effects of, 101, 104. Israella, 392. Lincoln, 345. Ives, 393. Lindley, 402. Listan Blanc, 402. Jack, 401. Little Grape, 318. James, 394. Little Winter Grape, 318. Janesville, 394. Long, 356. Jaques, 401. Longworth, Nicholas, mentioned, 8. Jarring Muscadine grapes, 241. Lucile, 403. Jefferson, 395. Luglienga, 402. Jefferson, Thomas, on native grapes, 5. | Lutie, 404. Jessica, 396. Jewel, 397. Macrodactylus subspinosus, 210. Joannenc, 402. Malaga, 405. Jordan, 415. Mammoth Catawba, 435. July Sherry, 401. Marion, 406. Marion Port, 406. Kay’s Seedling, 382. Marketing, 230, 246. Keller’s White, 345. cooperative, 246. Kensington, 398. Markets, accessibility, 30. Kentucky Vineyard Society, 7. general versus local, 31. Keuka Lake grape region, 21. Marking for planting, 79. King, 399. Martha, 407. Kittredge, 393. Massasoit, 408. Kniffin, Wm., mentioned, 132. Maxatawney, 409. McKee, 382. Labels for packages, 238. McPike, 405. Labor, determinant of grape regions, | Mead’s Seedling, 345. 32. Mealy-bug, 202. Ladies’ Choice, 358. Memory, 409. Lady, 399. Memythrus polistiformis, 217. Lady Downs, for forcing, 198. Mendel’s laws, 281. 454 INDEX Merceron, 345. Oporto, 422. Merrimac, 410. Othello, 422. Michigan, 345. Ozark, 423. Mildew in graperies, 203. Mills, 411. Packages for California, 245. Mish, 411. for eastern America, 236. Mission, 412. for Muscadine grapes, 243. Missouri Riesling, 413. Packing houses, 233. Montefiore, 413. construction of, 234. Moore Early, 414. cost of, 233. Moore, Jacob, mentioned, 276. Packing, in the East, 237. Moscatello, 415. Muscadine grapes, 241. Moscatello Black, 415. Packing tables, 234. Mountain Grape, 313, 318. Palomino, 424. Moyer, 415. Paw Paw grape region, 22. Moyer’s Early Red, 415. Payne's Early, 391. Muncy, 345. Peabody, 424. Munson, mentioned, 277. Pedicel defined, 305. on pruning, 136. Peduncle defined, 305. on resistant species, 63. Perfection, 425. Munson method of pruning, 136. Pergolas, training vines on, 142. Muscadine Grape, 310. Perkins, 426. Muscadine, 435. Pests in graperies, 202. Muscadine grapes for wine, 256. Petiole, characters of, 307. Muscatel, 416. Pholus achemon, 217. Muscat Hamburg, 417. Phosphorus, benefits from, 101. for forcing, 197. Phylloxera, 13, 61, 205. J Muscat of Alexandria, 418. control of, 206. Mustang Grape, 323. Phylloxera vastatrix, 205. of Florida, 312. Pickers, 231. Mutations in improving grapes, 277. Picking, accounts for, 232. appliances, 232. time of, 231. + | Pigeon Grape, 318. Pine-wood Grape, 320. Piquette, making, 270, Napoleon I, mentioned, 196. Neal, 382. Niagara, 418. Niagara grape region, 20. : Nitrogen, benefits from, 101. arise tee Noah, 419. Pane grafted vines, 68. in graperies, 198. Plasmopara viticola, 220. Pliny, mentioned, 2. Plowing the vineyard, 94. to combat pests, 95. Pocklington, 426. Pollen, characters of, 306. Pollinating in hybridizing, 280. Polychrosis viteana, 214. Pomace as a by-product, 270, Ohio, 401. Possum Grape, 317. Ohio River grape region, 22. Posts, 119. Nodes defined, 301. Nodosities, 66. Northern Astivalis, 322. Northern Muscadine, 420. Northern Summer Grape, 322. Norton, 421. Norton, Dr. D. N., mentioned, 11. Noyes, Dr., mentioned, 15. Number of vines to the acre, 76. INDEX Posts, — Continued. bracing, 120. material, 119. setting, 120. Post-oak Grape, 320. Post-oak grapes, 13. Potassium, benefits from, 101. Poughkeepsie, 427. Powdery mildew, control of, 223. description of, 222. Powell, 358. Pre-cooling grapes, 245. Prentiss, 428. : Preparation for planting, 76, 82. Preparing vines for planting, 80, 81. Prince Edward, 356. Prince, W. R., mentioned, 274. Profits from fertilizers, 101. Pruning, before planting, 160. cordon method, 153. European grapes in eastern America, 107. fan-shaped, 153, 172. first summer, 160. first winter, 161. for fruit, 112. for wood, 112. in eastern America, 108. Muscadine grapes, 143. on the Pacific slope, 150. principles of, 111. second summer, 161. second winter, 163. single vertical cordon, 157. summer, 115. third summer, 167. third winter, 168. to regulate the crop, 110. to regulate the vine, 111. unilateral horizontal cordon, 158. vase-form, 153. winter, 114. work of, 118. Pruning and training distinguished, 109. Prunings, collecting, 118. Purple Cornichon, 429. Quality defined, 307. Raffa, in grafting, 54. Raisin industry, seat of, 263. Raisin-making, account of, 264. Raisin output, value of, 263. Raisins, classes of, 266. dipping and scalding, 264. packing, 265. seeded, 267. varieties for, 263. Randall, 331. Raphe defined, 308. Rating as to resistance to pieiloxeer! 66. Rattling, 224. Rebecca, 429. Reciprocal influence of stock and cion, 68. Red Eagle, 430. Red River, 357. Red-spider in graperies, 202. Refrigerator cars for grapes, 245. Regal, 431. Rejuvenating old vines, 147. Renewal by canes, 116. by spurs, 117. Renewing fruiting wood, 116. Requa, 431. Returns from Muscadine grapes, 242. Ricketts, J. H., mentioned, 274. Ringing grape vines, 289. operation of, 290. results of, 291. theory of, 290. Riparia Gloire, 64, 65. Riparia grande glabre, 64, 65. Riparia Solonis, 64. Ripening dates for grapes, 296. Ripe-rot, control of, 225. description of, 225. River Grape, 314. Riverbank Grape, 314. Riverbank grapes, 13. Riverside Grape, 314. Roanoke, 435. Robins, depredations of, 293. Rochester, 432. Rock Grape, 313. Rogers, E. S., mentioned, 274. Rommel, 433. Rommel, Jacob, mentioned, 276. Root, its parts named, 301. Root-forms of grapes, 67. Rootlets defined, 301. 456 INDEX Root-tip defined, 301. Rosaki, 433. Rose chafer, control of, 211. life history of, 210. Rose of Peru, 4384. Rose of Tennessee, 345. Rotundifolia grapes, 9. Ruff, 358. Rupestris St. George, 64. Salem, 435. Sand Grape, 313. Sandusky grape region, 22. Sanitation in the vineyard, 227. Saratoga, 345. Scuppernong, 310, 435. Seasonal sum of heat, 24. Secretary, 436. Seedlings, selecting, 37. Seeds, as by-products, 271. characters of, 308. parts of, 308. Selecting vines, 81. Selection in improving grapes, 277. Self-sterility in grapes, 285. cause of, 286. remedy for, 287. Senasqua, 437. Seneca Lake grape region, 21. Shelling, 424. Shipping from California, 245. Shoots, characters of, 303. defined, 301. disposition of, in training, 123. drooping, in training, 132. horizontal, in training, 141. upright, in training, 125. Single-eye cuttings, 40. making, 41. planting, 41. Single-stem, Four-cane Kniffin, 132. Singleton, 345. Single vertical cordon, 157. Sites for vineyards, 26, 32. Skin, characters of, 308. Smith, Captain John, mentioned, 5. Smudging vineyards, 25. Soil adaptations, 29. fertility, 28. Soils for grapes, 27. ideal, 28. Soils for grapes, — Continued. over-rich, 107. uneven, 105. Sour Winter Grape, 317. Southern Astivalis, 321. Southern Fox Grape, 310. Spanish Grape, 318. Species, conspectus of, 310. resistant to phylloxera, 62. Sphaceloma ampelinum, 223. Sports in improving grapes, 277. Spraying suggestions, 228. Springstein, 401. Spurs defined, 301. Spur-renewal, 117. Staking vines, 162. Stamens, characters of, 306. Stem defined, 301. its parts named, 301. Stocks, resistant to phylloxera, 61. for American grapes, 69. for European grapes, 69. Storage-room for grapes, 239. Storing grapes, 238. Stripping, 118. Suckers defined, 301. Sugar Grape, 313. Sultana, 438. Sultanina, 438. Summer Grape, 318. Summer grapes, 11. Summer pruning, 115. Swamp Grape, 318. Sweet-scented Grape, 314. Sweetwater, 347. Syrian, for forcing, 198. Talman’s Seedling, 346. Tap-root defined, 301. Taylor, 439. Tekomah, 343. Tendrils, characters of, 304. defined, 301. Theophrastus, on grafting, 45. Thinning in graperies, 201. Thompson's Seedless, 438. Thrips, 211. in graperies, 202. Tillage, 92. methods, 93. time to cease, 95. INDEX Tillage, — Continued. tools for, 93. Time to plant, 84. Tokay, 345. Tongue grafting, 52. Training, Chautauqua method, 125. classification of methods, 125. in eastern America, 123. fan-method, 131. in graperies, 198. Keuka method, 139. Trellises, 119. Triumph, 440. Tuberosities, 66. Turkey Grape, 320. Two-trunk Kniffin, 135. Tying, 122. Typhlocyba comes, 211. caused by phylloxera, Ulster, 441. Umbrella Kniffin, 134. Uncinula necator, 222. Unilateral horizontal cordon, 158. Valk, Dr., mentioned, 274. Varieties of European grapes for eastern America, 191. Varieties resistant to phylloxera, 62. Verdal, 442. Vergennes, 442. Vertical canes, 174. cordons, 175. Vinegar from grapes, 269. Vines, nursery versus home grown, 59. “pedigreed,” 59. rejuvenating old, 147. resistant to phylloxera, 61. young, care of, 87. Vineyard grafting, in eastern America, 45. on Pacific slope, 48. Vineyard, management, 73. returns in the Hast, 247. sanitation, 227. sites, 32. Vintage, time of, 254. Virgil, on soils, 28, quoted, 31, 34, 37. Virginia Amber, 345. 457 Vitis, genus defined, 308. Vitis estivalis, 11, 318. Bourquiniana, 11, 321. glauca, 321. Lincecumii, 13, 320. Berlandieri, 318. bicolor, 322. candicans, 323. cordifolia, 317. Labrusca, 7, 324. Munsoniana, 312. riparia, 314. (Syn. of V. vulpina.) rotundifolia, 9, 310. rupestris, 313. vinifera, 2, 328. vulpina, 314. Vulpina grapes, 13. as direct producers, 13. Wakeman, Elbert, mentioned, 136. Walter, 443. Warren, 382, 401. Warrenton, 382. Washington, 371. Water, influence Bs Watering, at planting, 86. in graperies, 202. Water sprouts defined, 301. Weather data and _ grape-growing, 26. White July, 402. White Nice, for forcing, 198. White Frontignan, 416. Wilder, 444. Wilmington Red, 448. Winchell, 445. Windbreaks Dl Wine, aging, 253. crushing grapes for, 252. fermentation of, 253. fining, 253. kinds of, 251. racking, 253. yeasts for, 253. Wine-grapes, prices paid for, 255. Wine-making, 252. Wire for trellises, 121. Wire grafting, 54. Winter Grape, 314, 317, 318. of, on climate, in grape-growing, 25, 458 INDEX Winter-killing, 26. Worthington, 15, 350. precautions against, 295. Wyoming, 448. Winter protection of grapes, 187, 294. | Wyoming Red, 448. cost of, 296. Winter-pruning, 114. Woodruff, 446. Yields in fertilizer experiments, 100, Woodward, 391. 101. Worden, 446. Y-trunk Kniffin training, 136. Printed in the United States of America. HE following pages contain advertisements of a few of the Macmillan books on kindred subjects. A NEW RURAL MANUAL Epirep By L. H. BAILEY Manual of Tree Diseases By W. HOWARD RANKIN, A.B., Pa.D. Assistant Professor of Plant Pathology New York State College of Agriculture, at Cornell University Illustrated, tr2mo, $2.50 The diseases of the more common trees of the United States are treated in this volume. The discussions of these diseases are grouped into chapters under the common name of the trees affected, and the chapters are arranged alpha- betically. In a general chapter are included discussions of the diseases common to all kinds of trees, such as samping- off of seedlings, temperature injuries to leaves and woody parts, smoke and gas injuries, wood-rots, and the like. The species of trees affected, the geographic distribution, de- structiveness, and symptoms of the different diseases are presented in full. The aim of the authors has been to furnish a descriptive guide for the diagnosis of tree diseases and the general methods of their control. CONTENTS Seedling Diseases and Injuries ; Leaf Diseases and Injuries ; Body and Branch Diseases and Injuries; Root Diseases and Injuries ; Diseases of : Alder; Arbor-Vite; Ash; Bald Cypress; Basswood; Beech; Birch: Buckeye; Butternut; Catalpa; Cedar; Chestnut; Elm; Fir; Hackberry; Hemlock; Hickory; Juniper; Larch; Locust; Maple; Oak; Pine; Poplar; Spruce: Sycamore; Walnut; Willow. Tree Surgery; Spraying and Dusting for Leaf Diseases. THE MACMILLAN COMPANY Publishers 64-66 Fifth Avenue New York A NEW RURAL MANUAL Epitep sy L. H. BAmEY Manual of Vegetable-Garden Insects By CYRUS RICHARD CROSBY AND MORTIMER DEMAREST LEONARD Of the New York State College of Agriculture, at Cornell University Illustrated, t2mo, $2.50 This is a practical account of the principal insects which attack truck and vegetable crops, including cabbages, cauliflowers, cucum- bers and melons, asparagus, potatoes, tomatoes, celery and parsnips, lettuce, peas, beans, beets, spinach, sweet-potatoes, and sweet corn. The life-history and habits of each insect are given, its injuries de- scribed and the methods of control are discussed. A chapter on insecticides gives an account of the more important materials now employed, with directions for their preparation and use. CONTENTS I. General Considerations. II. Insects Injurious to Cabbage and Related Crops. III. Pea and Bean Insects. IV. Beet and Spinach Insects. V. Insects Injurious to Cucumber, Squash, and Melon, VI. Potato Insects. VII. Tomato Insects. VIII. Eggplant Insects. IX. Insects Injurious to Carrot, Celery, Parsnip, etc. X. Asparagus Insects. XI. Corn Insects. XII. Sweet Potato Insects. XIII. Onion Insects. XIV. Insects Injurious to Minor Vegetable Crop, XV. Cutworms and Army Worms. XVI. Blister-Beetles, XVII. Flea-Beetles. XVIII. Unclassified Pests. XIX. Insects and Insecticides. THE MACMILLAN COMPANY Publishers 64-66 Fifth Avenue New York A NEW VOLUME IN THE RURAL SCIENCE SERIES EpiteD BY L. H. BAmey Peach-Growing By H. P. GOULD Pomologist in charge of Fruit Production Investigations Bureau of Plant Industry, U. S. Department of Agriculture Illustrated, t2mo, $2.00 Here is a book which covers the general field of growing peaches and placing them within reach of the consumer. It is practical. It is detailed. It is a handbook for peach-growers of North and East, as well as South and West. Peach literature has been notably limited, except for experiment station bulletins and reports. This book gathers into one compact, fully illustrated volume the principles and practice of successful peach production. CONTENTS I. Historical Notes. II. Economic Status and Extent of the Peach Industry. lil. Location and Site of the Orchard. IV. Propagation of Peach Trees. V. Details of Planting an Orchard, VI. Orchard Management. Vil. The Tillage of Peach Orchards, VIII. Inter-planted Crops. IX. Fertilizers for Peach Orchards, X. Pruning Peach Trees. XI. Insect and Disease Control. XII. Thinning the Fruit. XIII. Irrigating Peaches. XIV. A Consideration of Adverse Temperatures, XV. Annual Cost Factors in Growing Peaches. XVI. Peach Varieties, Botany and Classification. XVII. Picking and Packing the Fruit. XVIII. Transportation, Storage, Marketing. THE MACMILLAN COMPANY Publishers 64-66 Fifth Avenue New York The Standard Cyclopedia of Horticulture Epirep By L. H. BAILEY WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF OVER 500 COLLABORATORS New edition, entirely rewritten and enlarged, with many new features; with 24 plates in color, 96 full-page half tones, and over 4,000 text illustra- tions. Complete in six volumes. Sold only in sets. Set cloth, $36.00 Leather, $60.00 “The Standard Cyclopedia of Horticulture,” pronounced by ex- perts to be an absolute necessity for every horticulturist and of tremendous value to every type of gardener, professional and ama- teur, is completed. ‘An indispensable work of reference to every one interested in the land and its products, whether commercially or professionally, as a student or an amateur,” is the Boston Transcript’s characterization of it, while Hortzculture adds that “it is very live literature for any one engaged in any department of the horticultural field.” “This really monumental performance will take rank as a stand- ard in its class. Illustrations and text are admirable. ... Our own conviction is that while the future may bring forth amplified editions of the work, it will probably never be superseded. Recog- nizing its importance, the publishers have given it faultless form. The typography leaves nothing to be desired, the paper is calcu- lated to stand wear and tear, and the work is at once handsomely and attractively bound.” — Mew York Daily Tribune. THE MACMILLAN COMPANY Publishers 64-66 Fifth Avenue New York THE RURAL MANUALS Epitep By L. H. BAILEY MANUAL OF VEGETABLE-GARDEN INSECTS By CYRUS RICHARD CROSBY AND MORTIMER DEMAREST LEONARD Of the New York State College of Agriculture, at Cornell University Illustrated, t2mo, $2.50 MANUAL OF TREE DISEASES By W. HOWARD RANKIN, A.B., Pa.D. Assistant Professor of Plant Pathology New York State College of Agriculture at Cornell University Illustrated, t2mo, $2.50 MANUAL OF MILK PRODUCTS By W. A. STOCKING, Jr. Illustrated, 12mo, $2.00 MANUAL OF FRUIT DISEASES By L. R. HESSLER anp H. H. WHETZEL Illustrated, 12mo, $2.00 THE PRUNING MANUAL By L. H. BAILEY Illustrated, 12mo, 407 pages, $2.00 MANUAL OF FRUIT INSECTS By MARK VERNON SLINGERLAND anv CYRUS R. CROSBY Of the New York State College of Agriculture, at Cornell University Illustrated, 12mo, 503 pages, $2.00 A MANUAL OF WEEDS By ADA E. GEORGIA Assistant in the Farm Course, New York State College of Agriculture, Cornell University With 385 illustrations by F. ScouYLER MATHEWS Illustrated, cloth, t12mo, 503 pages, index, $2.00 MANUAL OF FARM ANIMALS A PracticaL GUIDE TO THE CHOOSING, BREEDING, AND KEEP OF Horses, CATTLE, SHEEP, AND SWINE By MERRITT W. HARPER Assistant Professor of Animal Husbandry in the New York State College of Agriculture at Cornell University Illustrated, 12mo, 545 pages, index, $2.00 MANUAL OF GARDENING A PracricAL GUIDE TO THE MAKING OF HOME GROUNDS AND THE GROWING OF FLOWERS, Fruits, AND VEGETABLES FOR HOME USE By LH. BAILEY Illustrated, cloth, t2mo, 544 pages, $2.00 THE FARM AND GARDEN RULE BOOK By L. H. BAILEY Revised and enlarged edition; illustrated, cloth, 12mo, $2.00 THE MACMILLAN COMPANY Publishers 64-66 Fifth Avenue New York