. ® SV ; . . : . es \ : . . \ . « ss HARVARD UNIVERSITY. LIBRARY OF THE MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY 53, v8] HO. Hagen Libary pre /2, 1920. A MANUAL OF THE ANATOMY OF INVERTEBRATED ANIMALS, BY THOMAS H. HUXLEY, LL.D., F.B.S. fh. NEW YORK: D. APPLETON AMS CaM PANY, 549 AND 551 BROADWAY. 1878. Cc. aa. ? ate ee a 7 # : ay ue 7 ; Py 7 . tf, ri a a a “ i” ey i? , i 4 im } a n citi ee i the i 4 4 ) : ¢ a - + F = =~ VRIES | YOOJOGS CMOS Ele FE EAM ZAOIREN LS Poh Bo Cali: Tue present volume on the Anatomy of Invertebrated Animals fulfills an undertaking to produce a treatise on comparative anatomy for students, into which I entered two-and-twenty years ago. A considerable installment of the work, relating wholly to the /nvertebrata, appeared in the Medical Times and Gazette for the years 1856 and 1857, under the title of ‘ Lectures on General Natural History.’ But a variety of circumstances having con- spired, about that time, to compel me to direct my atten- tion more particularly to the Vertebrata, I was led to in- terrupt the publication of the “ Lectures”? and to com- plete the Vertebrate half of the proposed work first. This appeared in 1871, as a “ Manual of the Anatomy of Verte- brated Animals.” A period of incapacity for any serious toil prevented me from attempting, before 1874, to grapple with the im- mense mass of new and important information respecting the structure, and especially the development, of Inverte- brated animals, which the activity of a host of investiga- tors has accumulated of late years. That my progress has been slow will not surprise any one who is acquainted with the growth of the literature of animal morphology, or with the expenditure of time involved in the attempt to verify for one’s self even the cardinal facts of that science; but I have endeavored, in 4 PREFACE. the last chapter, to supply the most important recent ad- ditions to our knowledge, respecting the groups treated of in those which have long been printed. When I commenced this work, it was my intention to continue the plan adopted in the “ Manual of the Anatomy of Vertebrated Animals,” of giving a summary account of what appeared to me to be ascertained morphological facts, without referring to my sources of information. I soon found, however, that it would be inconvenient to carry out this scheme consistently ; and some of my pages are, | am afraid, somewhat burdened with notes and ref- erences. I am the more careful to mention this circumstance as, had it been my purpose to give any adequate Bibliography, the conspicuous absence of the titles of many important books and memoirs might appear unaccountable and in- deed blameworthy. My object, in writing the book, has been to make it useful to those who wish to become acquainted with the broad outlines of what is at present known of the morphol- ogy of the Lnwertebrata ; though I have not avoided the incidental mention of facts connected with their physiol- ogy and their distribution. On the other hand, I have ab- stained from discussing questions of etiology, not because I underestimate their importance, or am insensible to the interest of the great problem of Evolution ; but because, to my mind, the growing tendency to mix up etiological speculations with morphological generalizations will, if unchecked, throw Biology into confusion. For the student, that which is essential is a knowledge of the facts of morphology ; and he should recollect that generalizations are empty formulas, unless there is some- thing in his personal experience which gives reality and substance to the terms of the propositions in which these generalizations are expressed. PREFACE. 5 The dissection of a single representative of each of the principal divisions of the Jnvertebrata will give the student a more real acquaintance with their comparative anatomy than any amount of reading of this, or any other book. And I have endeavored to facilitate practical study by supplying a somewhat full description of individual forms, in the case of the more complicated types. That the power of repeating a “ Classification of Ani- mals,” with all the appropriate definitions, has anything to do with genuine knowledge is one of the commonest and most mischievous delusions of both students and their examiners. The real business of the learner is to gain a true and vivid conception of the characteristics of what may be termed the natural orders of animals. The mode of ar- rangement, or classification, of these into larger groups is a matter of altogether secondary importance. As such, I have relegated this subject to a subordinate place in the last chapter; and I have thought it unnecessary, either to discuss the systems proposed by others, or to give reasons for passing over, in silence, my own former attempts in this direction. Of the manifold imperfections in the execution of the task which I have set myself, few will be more sensible than Iam; but I trust that the book, such as it is, may be of use to the beginner. Those who desire to pursue the study of the /nverte- brata further will do well to consult the excellent treatises of Von Siebold,’ Gegenbaur,’ and Claus;* and the elabo- 1 “ Lehrbuch der vergleichenden Anatomie der wirbellosen Thiere,” 1848. One of the best books on the subject ever written, and still indispensable. 2 Grundziige der vergleichenden Anatomie,” 1870; and ‘“ Grundriss der vergleichenden Anatomie,” 1874. 3“ Grundziige der Zodlogie.”’ 3tte Auflage, 1876. 6 PREFACE. yate works of Milne-Edwards’ and Bronn,’ in which a very full Bibliography will be met with. Dr. Rolleston’s valuable “ Types of Animal Life,” and the “ Elementary Instruction in Practical Biology,” by myself and Dr. Martin, will prove useful adjuncts to the appliances of the practical worker. 1‘¢Tecons sur la Physiologie et Anatomie comparée de ?Homme et des Animaux.”? Tomes i.-xii. (incomplete). 2 ‘* Die Klassen und Ordnungen des Thierreichs.”? Bde. i.-vi. (incomplete). Lonpon, June, 1877. CON TENTS : PAGE PREFACE, . ; ‘ , : 3 . . ‘ ge INTRODUCTION: THE GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF BIOLOGY, «. Cap. J.—Tue Distinctive CHARACTERS OF ANIMALS, . : : . 44 IJ.—Tue Protozoa, . 3 ‘ F : : ; , =) %3 IIJ.—Tue PoriFeraA AND THE C@LENTERATA, . . ‘ : =p OP IV.—Tue TURBELLARIA, THE ROTIFERA, THE TREMATODA, AND THE CESTOIDEA, ; : , ‘ ‘ ; : ; aor ay V.—Tue Hrrupinea, THE OLIGOCHATA, THE POLYCHATA, THE GEPHYREA, F ‘ : : ‘ : : ; See) VI.—TuHE ARTHROPODA, . ‘ ‘ : : 3 : : . 219 VII.—Tue AIR-BREATHING ARTHROPODA, . : : F : a 820 VIII.—Tue Potyzoa, THE Bracuiopopa, AND THE MOLLUSCA, . . 389 IX.—TnHe EcHINODERMATA, . ‘ ; : ‘ ; : . 466 X.—TuHe Tunicata or ASCIDIOIDA, : : : ; : 2 OO XI.—Tue Peripatmea, THE MyzosTOMATA, THE ENTEROPNEUSTA, THE CH&TOGNATHA, THE NEMATOIDEA, THE PHYSEMARIA, THE ACANTHOCEPHALA, AND THE DICYEMIDA, . : . 534 XII.—Tue Taxonomy oF INVERTEBRATED ANIMALS, . ; : . 561 INDEX, . F F : ; 3 ; é : : . 589 ion p oe 7 p as = ) ss . 7 Bs Mid ve =, Md reir acd =e ® ‘al. ’ ae a y ae vit i at ig ‘ ites 224 Shee <= ah : 2S . * , . pee 3O4 raf “v te es if 5? nl . tA se v ant Pat ae wale Hae Fer Keer a acomistiagiel ge ae: " ~ ‘i ears, = Cys < 4 “ i. Kae. iat rAd: Rea, “PL SON EN. abe ren! pctere see TT! te 4, 6 RIPAR oe wcres at aabiategon? ? Li ~ . & *- +4. Ra nd et , ge 4 wf 4 aa ST ed “ hy Fi yet Lareerc? ands Asenaresbatei tes castesaneah Sige} © fees 73> ane Risk : “j ir r 7 ; = ae ; Aan fri s Shh be . i ia i ‘ ; Papiirtosiaindite (hm yt sual Spay i Pe ghae AE Rae iso = aaNet ye = ieee "Es 4 a oe rh a pe is THE ANATOMY INVERTEBRATED ANIMALS. INTRODUCTION. I.—THE GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF BIOLOGY. THE biological sciences are those which deal with the phenomena manifested by living matter; and though it is customary and convenient to group apart such of these phe- nomena as are termed mental, and such of them as are ex- hibited by men in society, under the heads of Psychology and Sociology, yet it must be allowed that no natural boun- dary separates the subject-matter of the latter sciences from that of Biology. Psychology is inseparably linked with Physiology; and the phases of social life exhibited by ani- mals other than man, which sometimes curiously foreshadow human policy, fall strictly within the province of the biolo- gist. On the other hand, the hiological sciences are sharply marked off from the abiological, or those which treat of the phenomena manifested by not-living matter, in so far as the properties of living matter distinguish it absolutely from all other kinds of things, and as the present state of knowledge furnishes us with no link between the living and the not- living. These distinctive properties of living matter are— 1, Its chemical composition—containing, as it invariably does, one or more forms of a complex compound of carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen, the so-called protein (which has never yet been obtained except as a product of living bodies) united with a large proportion of water, and forming 10 THE ANATOMY OF INVERTEBRATED ANIMALS, the chief constituent of a substance which, in its primary un- modified state, is known as protoplasm. 2. Its universal disintegration and waste by oxidation; and its concomitant reintegration by the intussusception of new matter. A process of waste resulting from the decomposition of the molecules of the protoplasm, in virtue of which they break up into more highly-oxidated products, which cease to form any part of the living body, is a constant concomitant of life. There is reason to believe that carbonic acid is al- ways one of these waste products, while the others contain the remainder of the carbon, the nitrogen, the hydrogen, and the other elements which may enter into the composition of the protoplasm. The new matter taken in to make good this constant loss is either a ready-formed protoplasmic material, supplied by some other living being, or it consists of the elements of protoplasm, united together in simpler combinations, which consequently have to be built up into protoplasm by the agency of the living matter itself. In either case, the addi- tion of molecules to those which already existed takes place, not at the surface of the living mass, but by interposition between the existing molecules of the latter. If the processes of disintegration and of reconstruction which characterize life balance one another, the size of the mass of living matter remains stationary, while, if the reconstructive process is the more rapid, the living body grows. But the increase of size which constitutes growth is the result of a process of molec- ular intussusception, and therefore differs altogether from the process of growth by accretion, which may be observed in crystals and is effected purely by the external addition of new matter—so that, in the well-known aphorism of Linnzus,’ the word ‘‘ grow,” as applied to stones, signifies a totally dif- ferent process from what is called “growth” in plants and animals. 3. Its tendency to undergo cyclical changes. In the ordinary course of Nature, all living matter proceeds from preéxisting living matter, a portion of the latter being detached and acquiring an independent existence. The new form takes on the characters of that from which it arose ; ex- hibits the same power of propagating itself by means of an offshoot ; and, sooner or later, like its predecessor, ceases to 1“ Lapides crescunt: vegetabilia crescunt et vivunt: animalia crescunt, vi- vunt et sentiunt.”’ CHARACTERS OF LIVING MATTER. 11 live, and is resolved into more highly-oxidated compounds of its elements. Thus an individual living body is not only constantly changing its substance, but its size and form are undergoing continual modifications, the end of which is the death and decay of that individual; the continuation of the kind being secured by the detachment of portions which tend to run through the same cycle of forms as the parent. No forms of matter which are either not living, or have not been derived from living matter, exhibit these three properties, nor any approach to the remarkable phenomena defined under the sec- ond and third heads. But, in addition to these distinctive characters, living matter has some other peculiarities, the chief of which are the dependence of all its activities upon moisture and upon heat, within a limited range of tempera- ture, together with the fact that it usually possesses a certain structure, or organization. As has been said, a large proportion of water enters into the composition of all living matter; a certain amount of dry- ing arrests vital activity, and the complete abstraction of this water is absolutely incompatible with either actual or poten- tial life. But many of the simpler forms of life may undergo desiccation to such an extent as to arrest their vital manifes- tations and convert them into the semblance of not-living matter, and yet remain potentially alive; that is to say, on being duly moistened they return to life again. And this revivification may take place after months, or even years, of arrested life. The properties of living matter are intimately related to temperature. Not only does exposure to heat sufficient to decompose protein matter destroy life, by demolishing the molecular structure upon which life depends ; but all vital activity, all phenomena of nutritive growth, movement, and reproduction, are possible only between certain limits of tem- perature. As the temperature approaches these limits the manifestations of life vanish, though they may be recovered by return to the normal conditions ; but, if it pass far beyond these limits, death takes place. This much is clear; but it is not easy to say exactly what the limits of temperature are, as they appear to vary in part with the kind of living matter, and in part with the con- ditions of moisture which obtain along with the temperature. The conditions of life are so complex in the higher organisms, that the experimental investigation of this question can be 12 THE ANATOMY OF INVERTEBRATED ANIMALS. satisfactorily attempted only in the lowest and simplest forms. It appears that, in the dry state, these are able to bear far greater extremes both of heat and cold than in the moist condition. Thus Pasteur found that the spores of fungi, when dry, could be exposed without destruction to a tem- perature of 120°-125° C. (248°-257° Fahr.), while the same spores, when moist, were all killed by exposure to 100° C. (212° Fahr.). On the other hand, Cagniard de la Tour found that dry yeast might be exposed to the extremely low tem- perature of solid carbonic acid (—60° C. or —76° Fahr.) with- out being killed. In the moist state he found that it might be frozen and cooled to —5° C. (23° Fahr.), but that it was killed by lower temperatures. However, it is very desirable that these experiments should be repeated, for Cohn’s careful observations on Bacteria show that, though they fall into a state of torpidity, and, like yeast, lose all their powers of ex- citing fermentation at, or near, the freezing-point of water, they are not killed by exposure for five hours to a tempera- ture below —10° C, (14° Fahr.), and, for some time, sinking to —18° C, (—0°.4 Fahr.). Specimens of Spirillum volutans, which had been cooled to this extent, began to move about some little time after the ice containing them thawed. . But Cohn remarks that Huglenw, which were frozen along with them, were all killed and disorganized, and that the same fate had befallen the higher Znfusoria and Rotifera, with the ex- ception of some encysted Vorticelle, in which the rhythmical movements of the contractile vesicle showed that life was preserved. Thus it would appear that the resistance of living matter to cold depends greatly on the special form of that matter, and that the limit of the Huglena, simple organism as it is, is much higher than that of the Bacterium. Considerations of this kind throw some light upon the apparently anomalous conditions under which many of the lower plants, such as Protococcus and the Diatomacee, and some of the lower animals, such as the Radiolaria, are ob- served to flourish. Protococcus has been found not only on the snows of great heights in temperate latitudes, but cover- ing extensive areas of ice and snow in the Arctic regions, where it must be exposed to extremely low temperatures— in the latter case for many months together ; while the Arctic and Antarctic seas swarm with Diatomacew and Radiolaria. It is on the Diatomacew, as Hooker has well shown, that all surface-life in these regions ultimately depends; and their enor- RESISTANCE TO HEAT AND COLD. 13 mous multitudes prove that their rate of multiplication is ade- quate to meet the demands made upon them, and is not seri- ously impeded by the low temperature of the waters, never much above the freezing-point, in which they habitually live. The maximum limit of heat which living matter can resist is no less variable than its minimum limit. Kihne found that marine Amcbe were killed when the temperature reached 35° C. (95° Fahr.), while this was not the case with fresh-water Amobe, which survived a heat of 5°, or even 10°, C. higher. Actinophrys Hichhornii was not killed until the temperature rose to 44° or 45° C. Didymium serpulais killed at 385° C.; while another Myxomycete, Athalium septicum, succumbs only at 40° C. Cohn (“ Untersuchungen iiber Bacterien,” eztrdge zur Biologie der Pflanzen, Heft 2, 1872) has given the results of a series of experiments conducted with the view of ascertain- ing the temperature at which bacteria are destroyed when living in a fluid of definite chemical composition, and free from all such complications as must arise from the inequalities of physical condition when solid particles other than the Bac- teria coexist with them. The fluid employed contained 0.1 gramme potassium phosphate, 0.1 gr. crystallized magnesium sulphate, 0.1 gr. tribasic calcium phosphate, and 0.2 gr. am- monium tartrate, dissolved in 20 cubic centimetres of distilled water. If toa certain quantity of this “ normal fluid” a small proportion of water containing Bacteria was added, the mul- tiplication of the Bacteria went on with rapidity, whether the mouth of the containing flask was open or hermetically closed. Hermetically-sealed flasks, containing portions of the normal fluid infected with Bacteria, were submerged in water heated to various temperatures, the flask being carefully shaken, with- out being raised out of the water, during its submergence. The result was, that in those flasks which were thus sub- jected, for an hour, to a heat of 60°-62° ©. (140°-143° Fahr.), the Bacteria underwent no development, and the fluid re- mained perfectly clear. On the other hand, in similar experi- ments in which the flasks were heated only to 40° or 50° C. (104°-122° Fahr.), the fluid became turbid, in consequence of the multiplication of the Bacteria, in the course of from two to three days. I am in the habit of demonstrating annually, that Pasteur’s solution and hay-infusion, after five minutes’ boiling in a flask properly stopped with cotton-wool, remain perfectly clear of living organisms, however long they may be kept. The same 14 THE ANATOMY OF INVERTEBRATED ANIMALS. holds good for a solution analogous to Cohn’s, but in which all the saline ingredients are ammonia salts;* and in which Bacteria flourish luxuriantly. Prof. Tyndall’s large series of experiments give the same results for fluids of the most diverse composition. The cases of milk and some other fluids in which Bacteria are said to appear, after they have been heated above the boiling-point, require renewed investigation. Both in Kiihne’s and in Cohn’s experiments, which last have lately been confirmed and extended by Dr. Roberts, of Man- chester, it was noted that long exposure to a lower temper- ature than that which brings about immediate destruction of life produces the same effect as short exposure to the latter temperature. Thus, though all the Bacteria were killed, with certainty, in the normal fluid, by short exposure to temper- atures at or above 60° C. (140° Fahr,), Cohn observed that, when a flask containing infected normal fluid was heated to 50°-52° C. (122°-125° Fahr.) for only an hour, the conse- quent multiplication of the Bacteria was manifested much earlier than in one which had been exposed for two hours to the same temperature. It appears to be very generally held that the simpler vege- table organisms are deprived of life at temperatures as high as 60° C. (140° Fahr.) ; but it is affirmed by competent ob- servers that Algw have been found living in hot springs at much higher temperatures, namely, from 168° to 208° Fahr., for which latter surprising fact we have the high authority of Descloiseaux. It is no explanation of these phenomena, but only another mode of stating them, to say that these organ- isms have become “ accustomed” to such temperatures. If this degree of heat were absolutely incompatible with the activity of living matter, the plants could no more resist it than they could become “accustomed ” to be being made red- hot. Habit may modify subsidiary, but cannot affect funda-- mental, conditions. ey Recent investigations point to the conclusion that the im- mediate cause of the arrest of vitality, in the first place, and of its destruction, in the second, is the coagulation of certain substances in the protoplasm, and that the latter contains various coagulable matters, which solidify at different temper- atures. And it remains to be seen how far the death of any form of living matter, at a given temperature, depends on the 1 These were as pure as I could obtain them. It is possible the fluid may have contained an infinitesimal proportion of fixed mineral matter. RESISTANCE TO HEAT AND COLD. 15 destruction of its fundamental substance at that heat, and how far death is brought about by the coagulation of merely accessory compounds. It may be safely said of all those living things which are large enough to enable us to trust the evidence of micro- scopes,’ that they are heterogeneous optically, and that their different parts, and especially the surface layer, as contrasted with the interior, differ physically and chemically; while, in most living things, mere heterogeneity is exchanged for a definite structure, whereby the body is distinguished into visibly diverse parts, which possess different powers or func- tions. Living things which present this visible structure are said to be organized ; and so widely does organization obtain among living beings, that organized and living are not unfre- quently used as if they were terms of coextensive applicabil- ity. This, however, is not exactly accurate, if it be thereby implied that all living things have a visible organization, as there are numerous forms of living matter of which it cannot properly be said that they possess either a definite visible ‘structure or permanently specialized organs: though doubt- less the simplest particle of living matter must possess a highly-complex molecular structure, which is far beyond the reach of vision. The broad distinctions which, as a matter of fact, exist between every known form of living substance and every other component of the material world, justify the separation of the biological sciences from all others. But it must not be supposed that the differences between living and not-living matter are such as to bear out the assumption that the forces at work in the one are different from those which are to be met with in the other. Considered apart from the phenomena of consciousness, the phenomena of life are all dependent upon the working of the same physical and chemical forces as those which are active in the rest of the world. It may be convenient to use the terms “ vitality” and “ vital force” to denote the causes of certain great groups of natural opera- 1In considering the question of the complication of molecular structure which even the smallest and simplest of living beings may possess, it is well to recollect that an organic particle ros00 of an inch in diameter, in which our best microscopes may be incompetent to reveal the slightest differentiation of parts, may be made up of 1,000,000 particles rss3005 of an inch in diameter, while the molecules of matter are probably much less than zso3s00 of an inch in diameter. Hence in such a body there is ample scope for any amount of com- plexity of molecular structure. 16 THE ANATOMY OF INVERTEBRATED ANIMALS. tions, as we employ the names of “ electricity” and “ electrical force”? to denote others ; but it ceases to be proper to do so, if such a name implies the absurd assumption that either “ elec- tricity ” or “vitality” is an entity playing the part of an effi- cient cause of electrical or vital phenomena. A mass of living protoplasm is simply a molecular machine of great complexity, the total results of the working of which, or its vital phenom- ena, depend, on the one hand, upon its construction, and, on the other, upon the energy supplied to it; and to speak of ‘vitality ” as anything but the name of a series of operations is as if one should talk of the “‘ horologity ” of a clock. Living matter, or protoplasm and the products of its meta- morphosis, may be regarded under four aspects : (1.) It has a certain external and internal form, the laiter being more usually called structure ; (2.) It occupies a certain position in space and in time ; (3.) It is the subject of the operation of certain forces, in virtue of which it undergoes internal changes, modifies exter- nal objects, and is modified by them; and— (4.) Its form, place, and powers, are the effects of certain causes. In correspondence with these four aspects of its subject, Biology is divisible into four chief subdivisions—I. MorPxot- ocy; IJ. Disrrireution; JII. Puystotoey; IV. A®r10oLoey. I. MorpHonoey. So far as living beings have a form and structure, they fall within the province of Anatomy and Histology, the latter being merely a name for that ultimate optical analysis of living structure which can be carried out only by the aid of the microscope. And, in so far as the form and structure of any living being are not constant during the whole of its existence, but undergo a series of changes from the commencement of that existence to its end, living beings have a Development. 'The history of development is an accuont of the anatomy of a liv- ing being at the successive periods of its existence, and of the manner in which one anatomical stage passes into the next. Finally, the systematic statement and generalization of the facts of Morphology, in such a manner as to arrange liv- ing beings in groups, according to their degrees of likeness, is Zaxonomy. HISTOLOGY. 1” The study of Anatomy and Development has brought to light certain generalizations of wide applicability and great importance. 1. It has been said that the great majority of living beings present a very definite structure. Unassisted vision and or- dinary dissection suffice to separate the body of any of the higher animals, or plants, into fabrics of different sorts, which always present the same general arrangement in the same organism, but are combined in different ways in different organisms. ‘I'he discrimination of these comparatively few fabrics, or tésswes, of which organisms are.composed, was the first step toward that ultimate analysis of visible structure which has become possible only by the recent perfection of microscopes and of methods of preparation. Histology, which embodies the results of this analysis, shows that every tissue of a plant is composed of more or less modified structural elements, each of which is termed a cell ; which cell, in its simplest condition, is merely a spheroidal mass of protoplasm, surrounded by a coat or sac—the cedl- wali—which contains cellulose. In the various tissues, these cells may undergo innumerable modifications of form—the protoplasm may become differentiated into a nucleus with its nucleolus, a primordial utricle, and a cavity filled with a wa- tery fluid, and the cell-wall may be variously altered in com- position or in structure, or may coalesce with others. But, however extensive these changes may be, the fact that the tissues are made up of morphologically distinct units—the cells—remains patent. And, if any doubt could exist on the subject, it would be removed by the study of development, which proves that every plant commences its existence as a simple cell, identical in its fundamental characters with the less modified of those cells of which the whole body is composed. But it is not necessary to the morphological unit of the plant that it should be always provided with a cell-wall. Cer- tain plants, such as Protococcus, spend longer or shorter peri- ods of their existence in the condition of a mere spheroid of protoplasm, devoid of any cellulose wall, while, at other times, the protoplasmic body becomes inclosed within a cell-wall, fab- ricated by its superficial layer. Therefore, just as the nucleus, the primordial utricle, and the central fluid, are no essential constituents of the morpho- logical unit of the plant, but represent results of its meta- morphosis, so the cell-wall is equally unessential ; and either the term “cell” must acquire a merely technical significance 18 THE ANATOMY OF INVERTEBRATED ANIMALS. as the equivalent of morphological unit, or some new term must be invented to describe the latter. On the whole, it is probably least inconvenient to modify the sense of the word ells” The histological analysis of animal tissues has led to sim- ilar results, and to difficulties of terminology of precisely the same character. In the higher animals, however, the modifi- cations which the cells undergo are so extensive that the fact that the tissues are, as in plants, resolvable into an aggrega- tion of morphological units, could never have been established without the aid of the study of development, which proves that the animal, no less than the plant, commences its exist- ence as a simple cell, fundamentally identical with the less modified cells which are found in the tissues of the adult. Though the nucleus is very constant among animal cells, it is not universally present ; and, among the lowest forms of animal life, the protoplasmic mass which represents the mor- phological unit may be, as in the lowest plants, devoid of a nucleus. In the animal the cell-wall never has the character of a shut sac containing cellulose ; and it is not a little diffi- cult, in many cases, to say how much of the so-called “ cell- wall” of the animal cell answers to the “ primordial utricle” and how much to the proper “ cellulose cell-wall ” of the vege- table cell. But it is certain that in the animal, as in the plant, neither cell-wall nor nucleus is an essential constituent of the cell, inasmuch as bodies which are unquestionably the equivalents of cells—true morphological units—may be mere masses of protoplasm, devoid alike of cell-wall and nucleus. For the whole living world, then, it results: that the mor- phological unit—the primary and fundamental form of life— is merely an individual mass of protoplasm, in which no fur- ther structure is discernible ; that independent living forms may present but little advance on this structure; and that all the higher forms of life are aggregates of such morphological units or cells variously modified. Moreover, all that is at present known tends to the conclu- sion that, in the complex aggregates of such units of which ail the higher animals and plants consist, no cell has arisen otherwise than by becoming separated from the protoplasm of a preéxisting cell; whence the aphorism, “ Omnis cellula e celluld.” It may further be added, as a general truth applicable to nucleated cells, that the nucleus rarely undergoes any consid- erable modification, the structures characteristic of the tis- DEVELOPMENT. 19 sues being formed at the expense of the more superficial pro- toplasm of the cells; and that, when nucleated cells divide, the division of the nucleus, as a rule, precedes that of the whole cell. : 2. In the course of its development every cell proceeds, from a condition in which it closely resembles every other cell, through a series of stages of gradually-increasing diver- gence, until it reaches that condition in which it presents the characteristic features of the elements of a special tissue. The development of the cell is, therefore, a gradual progress from the general to the special state. The like holds good of the development of the body as a whole. However complicated one of the higher animals or plants may be, it begins its separate existence under the form of a nucleated cell. This, by division, becomes con- verted into an aggregate of nucleated cells—the parts of this aggregate, following different laws of growth and multiplica- tion, give rise to the rudiments of the organs; and the parts of these rudiments again take on those modes of growth, mul- tiplication, and metamorphosis, which are needful to convert the rudiment into the perfect structure. The development of the organism as a whole, therefore, repeats in principle the development of the cell. It is a prog- ress from a general to a special form, resulting from the grad- ual differentiation of the primitively similar morphological units of which the body is composed. Moreover, when the stages of development of two animals are compared, the number of these stages which are similar to one another is, as a general rule, proportional to the close- ness of the resemblance of the adult forms ; whence it fol- lows that the more closely any two animals are allied in adult structure, the later are their embryonic conditions distinguish- able, And this general rule holds for plants no less than for animals. The broad principle, that the form in which the more com- plex living things commence their development is always the same, was first expressed by Harvey in his famous aphorism, “ Omne vivum ex ovo,’ which was intended simply as a mor- phological generalization, and in no wise implied the rejection of spontaneous generation, as it is commonly supposed to do. Moreover, Harvey’s study of the development of the chick led him to promulgate that theory of ‘ epigenesis,” in which the doctrine that development is a progress from the general to the special is implicitly contained. 20 THE ANATOMY OF INVERTEBRATED ANIMALS. Caspar F. Wolff furnished further, and indeed conclusive, proof of the truth of the theory of epigenesis ; but, unfortu- nately, the authority of Haller and the speculations of Bonnet led science astray, and it was reserved for Von Baer to put the nature of the process of development in its true light, and to formulate it in his famous law. . 3. Development, then, is a process of differentiation by which the primitively similar parts of the living body become more and more unlike one another. This process of differentiation may be effected in several ways: (1.) The protoplasm of the germ may not undergo divi- sion and conversion into a cell aggregate ; but various parts of its outer and inner substance may be metamorphosed di- rectly into those physically and chemically different materials which constitute the body of the adult. This occurs in such animals as the Jnfusoria, and in such plants as the unicellular Alge and Fungi. (2.) The germ may undergo division, and be converted into an aggregate of division masses, or blastomeres, which become cells, and give rise to the tissues by undergoing a metamorphosis of the same kind as that to which the whole body is subjected in the preceding case. The body, formed in either of these ways, may, as a whole, undergo metamorphosis by differentiation of its parts; and this differentiation may take place without reference to any axis of symmetry, or it may have reference to such an axis. In the latter case, the parts of the body which become dis- tinguishable may correspond on the two sides of the axis (bi- lateral symmetry), or may correspond along several lines paral- lel with the axis (radial symmetry). The bilateral or radial symmetry of the body may be fur- ther complicated by its segmentation, or separation by divi- sions transverse to the axis, into parts, each of which corre- sponds with its predecessor or successor in the series. In the segmented body, the segments may or may not give rise to symmetrically or asymmetrically disposed processes, which are appendages, using that word in its most general sense. And the highest degree of complication of structure, in both animals and plants, is attained by the body when it be- comes divided into segments provided with appendages ; when the segments not only become very different from one another, but some coalesce and lose their primitive distinctness ; and DIFFERENTIATION OF STRUCTURE. 21 when the appendages and the segments into which they are subdivided similarly become differentiated and coalesce. It is in virtue of such processes that the flowers of plants, and the heads and limbs of the Arthropoda and of the Ver- tebrata, among animals, attain their extraordinary diversity and complication of structure. A flower-bud is a segmented body or axis, with a certain number of whorls of appendages ; and the perfect flower is the result of the gradual differentia- tion and confluence of these primitively similar segments and their appendages. The head of an insect or of a crustacean is, in like manner, composed of a number of segments, each with its pair of appendages, which by differentiation and con- fluence are converted into the feelers and variously modified oral appendages of the adult. In some complex organisms, the process of differentiation by which they pass from the condition of aggregated embryo cells to the adult, can be traced back to the laws of growth of the two or more cells into which the embryo cell is divided, each of these cells giving rise to a particular portion of the adult organism. Thus the fertilized embryo cell in the arche- gonium of a fern divides into four cells, one of which gives rise to the rhizome of the young fern, another to its first root- let, while the other two are converted into a placenta-like mass which remains imbedded in the prothallus. The structure of the stem of Chara depends upon the dif- ferent properties of the cells, which are successively derived by transverse division from the apical cell. An internodal cell, which elongates greatly, and does not divide, is suc- ceeded by a nodal cell, which elongates but little, and becomes greatly subdivided ; this by another internodal cell, and so on in regular alternation. In the same way the structure of the stem, in all the higher plants, depends upon the laws which govern the manner of division and of metamorphosis ‘ the apical cells, and of their continuation in the cambium ayer. In all animals which consist of cell-aggregates, the cells of which the embryo is at first composed arrange themselves by the splitting, or by a process of invagination, of the blas- toderm into two layers, the epiblast and the hypoblast, be- tween which a third intermediate layer, the mesoblast, ap- pears ; and each layer gives rise to a definite group of organs in the adult. Thus, in the Vertebrata, the epiblast gives rise to the cerebro-spinal axis, and to the epidermis and its deriva- tives ; the hypoblast, to the epithelium of the alimentary 22 THE ANATOMY OF INVERTEBRATED ANIMALS. canal and its derivatives ; and the mesoblast, to intermediate structures. ‘T'he tendency of recent inquiry is to prove that the several layers of the germ evolve analogous organs in in- vertebrate animals, and to indicate the possibility of tracing the several germ-layers back to the blastomeres of the yelk, from the subdivision of which they proceed. It is conceivable that all the forms of life should have pre- sented about the same differentiation of structure, and should have differed from one another by superficial characters, each form passing by insensible gradations into those most like it. In this case Taxonomy, or the classification of morphological facts, would have had to confine itself to the formation of a serial arrangement, representing the serial gradation of these forms in Nature. It is conceivable, again, that living beings should have dif- fered as widely in structure as they actually do, but that the interval between any two extreme forms should have been filled up by an unbroken series of gradations ; in which case, again, classification could only affect the formation of series— the strict definition of groups would be as impossible as in the former case. As a matter of fact, living beings differ enormously, not only in differentiation of structure, but in the modes in which that differentiation is brought about; and the intervals be- tween extreme forms are not filled up, in the existing world, by complete series of gradations. Hence it arises that living beings are, to a great extent, susceptible of classification into groups, the members of each group resembling one another, and differing from all the rest, by certain definite peculiarities. No two living beings are exactly alike, but it is a matter of observation that, among the endless diversities of living things, some constantly resemble one another so closely that it is impossible to draw any line of demarkation between them, while they differ only in such characters as are associated with sex. Such as thus closely resemble one another consti- tute a morphological species ; while different morphological species are defined by constant characters which are not merely sexual. The comparison of these lowest groups, or morphological species, with one another, shows that more or fewer of them possess some character or characters in common—some feat- ure in which they resemble one another and differ from all other species—and the group or higher order thus formed is MORPHOLOGICAL GROUPS. 93 a genus. The generic groups thus constituted are susceptible of being arranged in a similar manner into groups of succes- sively higher order, which are known as families, orders, classes, and the like. The method pursued in the classification of living forms is, in fact, exactly the same as that followed by the maker of an index in working out the heads indexed. In an alphabetical arrangement, the classification may be truly termed a mor- phological one, the object being to put into close relation all those leading words which resemble one another in the arrangement of their letters, that is, in their form, and to keep apart those which differ in structure. Headings which begin with the same word, but differ otherwise, might be compared to genera with their species; the groups of words with the same first two syllables, to families ; those with identical first syllables, to orders; and those with the same initial letter, to classes. But there is this difference between the index and the Taxonomic arrangement of living forms, that in the for- mer there is nothing but an arbitrary relation between the various classes, while in the latter the classes are similarly capable of coérdination into larger and larger groups, until all are comprehended under the common definition of living beings. The differences between “ artificial” and “ natural ” clas- sifications are differences in degree, and not in kind. In each case the classification depends upon likeness; but in an artifi- cial classification some prominent and easily-observed feature is taken as the mark of resemblance or dissemblance ; while, in a natural classification, the things classified are arranged ac- cording to the totality of their morphological resemblances, and the features which are taken as the marks of groups are those which have been ascertained by observation to be the indications of many likenesses or unlikenesses. And thus a natural classification is a great deal more than a mere index. It is a statement of the marks of similarity of organization ; of the kinds of structure which, as a matter of experience, are found universally associated together ; and, as such, it fur- nishes the whole foundation for those indications by which conclusions as to the nature of the whole of an animal are drawn from a knowledge of some part of it. When a paleontologist argues from the characters of a bone or a shell to the nature of the animal to which that bone or shell belonged, he is guided by the empirical morphologi- cal laws established by wide observation, that such a kind of Q4 THE ANATOMY OF INVERTEBRATED ANIMALS. bone or shell is associated with such and such structural feat- ures in the rest of the body, and no others. And it is these empirical laws which are embodied and expressed in a natural classification. II. DISTRIBUTION. Living beings occupy certain portions of the surface of the earth, inhabiting either the dry land, or the fresh or salt waters; or being competent to maintain their existence in either. In any given locality, it is found that these different media are inhabited by different kinds of living beings ; and that the same medium, at different heights in the air and at different depths in the water, has different living inhabitants. Moreover, the living populations of localities which differ considerably in latitude, and hence in climate, always present considerable differences. But the converse proposition is not true—that is to say, localities which differ in longitude, even if they resemble one another in climate, often have very dis- similar Faune and lore. It has been discovered, by careful comparison of local fau- ne and flor, that certain areas of the earth’s surface are inhabited by groups of animals and plants which are not found elsewhere, and which thus characterize each of these areas. Such areas are termed Provinces of Distribution. 'There is no parity between these provinces in extent, nor in the phys- ical configuration of their boundaries ; and, in referénce to existing conditions, nothing can appear to be more arbitrary and capricious than the distribution of living beings. The study of distribution is not confined to the present order of Nature; but, by the help of geology, the naturalist is enabled to obtain clear, though too fragmentary, evidence of the characters of the faunze and florze of antecedent epochs. The re- mains of organisms which are contained in the stratified rocks prove that, in any given part of the earth’s surface, the living population of earlier epochs was different from that which now exists in the locality ; and that, on the whole, the difference becomes greater the farther we go back in time. The organic remains which are found in the later Cainozoic deposits of any district are always closely allied to those now found in the province of distribution in which that locality is included ; while in the older Cainozoic the resemblance is less; and in the Mesozoic, and the Paleozoic strata, the fossils may be similar to creatures at present living in some other province, or may be altogether unlike any which now exist. DISTRIBUTION IN TIME. 25 In any given locality, the succession of living forms may appear to be interrupted by numerous breaks—the associated species in each fossiliferous bed being quite distinct from those above and those below them. But the tendency of all palaeontological investigation is to show that these breaks are only apparent, and arise from the incompleteness of the series of remains which happens to have been preserved in any given locality. As the area over which accurate geological investi- gations have been carried on extends, and as the fossiliferous rocks found in one locality fill up the gaps left in another, so do the abrupt demarkations between the fauna and florz of successive epochs disappear—a certain proportion of the gen- era and even of the species of every period, great or small, being found to be continued for a longer or shorter time into the next succeeding period. It is evident, in fact, that the changes in the living population of the globe which have taken place during its history have been effected, not by the sud- den replacement of one set of living beings by another, but by a process of slow and gradual introduction of new species, accompanied by the extinction of the older forms. It isa remarkable circumstance that, in all parts of the globe in which fossiliferous rocks have yet been examined, the successive terms of the series of living forms which have thus succeeded one another are analogous. The life of the Mesozoic epoch is everywhere characterized by the abundance of some groups of species of which no trace is to be found in either earlier or later formations ; and the like is true of the Palzeozoic epoch. Hence it follows, not only that there has been a succession of species, but that the general nature of that succession has been the same all over the globe ; and it is on this ground that fossils are so important to the geologist as marks of the relative age of rocks. | The determination of the morphological relations of the species which have thus succeeded one another, is a problem of profound importance and difficulty, the solution of which, however, is already clearly indicated. For, in several cases, it is possible to show that, in the same geographical area, a form A, which existed during a certain geological epoch, has been replaced by another form B, at a later period; and that this form B has been replaced, still later, by a third form C. When these forms, A, B, and ©, are compared together they are found to be organized upon the same plan, and to be very similar even in most of the details of their structure; but B differs from A by a slight modification of some of its 9 al 26 THE ANATOMY OF INVERTEBRATED ANIMALS. parts, which modification is carried to a still greater extent in C. In other words, A, B, and ©, differ from one another in the same fashion as the earlier and later stages of the em- bryo of the same animals differ ; and, in successive epochs, we have the group presenting that progressive specialization which characterizes the development of the individual. Clear evidence that this progressive specialization of structure has actually occurred has as yet been obtained in only a few cases (e. g., Lquide, Crocodilia), and these are confined to the highest and most complicated forms of life ; while it is de- monstrable that, even as reckoned by geological time, the pro- cess must have been exceedingly slow. Among the lower and less complicated forms, the evidence of progressive modification, furnished by comparison of the oldest with the latest forms, is slight, or absent ; and some of these have certainly persisted, with very little change, from extremely ancient times to the present day. It is as important to recognize the fact that certain forms of life have thus persisted, as it is to admit that others have undergone progressive modification. It has been said that the successive terms in the series of living forms are analogous in all parts of the globe. But the species which constitute the corresponding or homotaxic terms in the series, in different localities, are not identical. And, though the imperfection of our knowledge at present pre- cludes positive assertion, there is every reason to believe that geographical provinces have existed throughout the period during which organic remains furnish us with evidence of the existence of life. The wide distribution of certain Paleozoic forms does not militate against this view ; for the recent in- vestigations into the nature of the deep-sea fauna have shown that numerous Crustacea, Echinodermata, and other inver- tebrate animals, have as wide a distribution now as their ana- logues possessed in the Silurian epoch. Ill, Paysroioey. Thus far, living beings have been regarded merely as definite forms of matter, and biology has presented no con- siderations of a different order from those which meet the student of mineralogy. But living things are not only natural bodies, having a definite form and mode of structure, growth, and development. They are machines in action; and, under FUNCTIONS AND ORGANS. Dall this aspect, the phenomena which they present have no par- aliel in the mineral world. The actions of living matter are termed its functions ; and these functions, varied as they are, may be reduced to three categories. They are either—(1), functions which affect the material composition of the body, and determine its mass, which is the balance of the processes of waste on the one hand and those of assimilation on the other; or (2), they are functions which subserve the process of reproduction, which is essentially the detachment of a part endowed with the pow- er of developing into an independent whole ; or (3), they are functions in virtue of which one part of the body is able to exert a direct influence on another, and the body, by its parts or as a whole, becomes a source of molar motion. ‘The first may be termed sustentative, the second generative, and the third correlative functions. Of these three classes of functions the first two only can be said to be invariably present in living beings, all of which are nourished, grow, and multiply. But there are some forms of life, such as many /ung?, which are not known to possess any powers of changing their form ; in which the protoplasm exhibits no movements, and reacts upon no stimulus; and in which any influence which the different parts of the body ex- ert upon one another must be transmitted indirectly from molecule to molecule of the common mass. In most of the lowest plants, however, and in all animals yet known, the body either constantly or temporarily changes its form, either with or without the application of a special stimulus, and thereby modifies the relations of its parts to one another, and of the whole to surrounding bodies; while, in all the higher animals, the different parts.of the body are able to affect, and be affected by one another, by means of a special tissue, termed nerve. Molar motion is effected on a large scale by means of another special tissue, muscle ; and the organism is brought into relation with surrounding bodies by means of a third kind of special tissue—that of the sensory organs—by means of which the forces exerted by surrounding bodies are trans- muted into affections of nerve. In the lowest forms of life, the functions which have been enumerated are seen in their simplest forms, and they are ex- erted indifferently, or nearly so, by all parts of the proto- plasmic body ; and the like is true of the functions of the body of even the highest organisms, so long as they are in the condition of the nucleated cell, which constitutes the 28 THE ANATOMY OF INVERTEBRATED ANIMALS. starting-point of their development. But the first precess in that development is the division of the germ into a number of morphological units or blastomeres, which, eventually, give rise to cells ; and, as each of these possesses the same physio- logical functions as the germ itself, it follows that each mor- phological unit is also a physiological unit, and the multicellu- lar mass is strictly a compound organism, made up of a mul- titude of physiologically independent cells. The physiologi- cal activities manifested by the complex whole represent the sum, or rather the resultant, of the separate and independent physiological activities resident in each of the simpler con- stituents of that whole. The morphological changes which the cells undergo in the course of the further development of the organism do not affect their individuality ; and, notwithstanding the modi- fication and confluence of its constituent cells, the adult or- ganism, however complex, is still an aggregate of morphologi- eal units. Nor is it less an aggregate of physiological units, each of which retains its fundamental independence, though that independence becomes restricted in various ways. Each cell, or that element of a tissue which proceeds from the modification of a cell, must needs retain its sustentative functions so long as it grows or maintains a condition of equilibrium ; but the most completely metamorphosed cells show no trace of the generative function, and many exhibit no correlative functions. Contrariwise, those cells of the adult organism which are the unmetamorphosed derivatives of the germ exhibit all the primary functions, not only nourishing themselves and growing, but multiplying, and frequently showing more or less marked movements. | Organs are parts of the body which perform particular functions. In strictness, perhaps, it is not quite right to speak of organs of sustentation or generation, each of these functions being necessarily performed by the morphological unit which is nourished or reproduced. What are called the organs of these functions are the apparatuses by which cer- tain operations, subsidiary to sustentation and generation, are carried on. Thus, in the case of the sustentative functions, all those organs may be said to contribute to these functions which are concerned in bringing nutriment within the reach of the ulti- mate cells, or in removing waste matter from them ; while in the case of the generative function, all those organs contribute to the function which produce the cells from which germs are MUSCLE AND NERVE. 29 given off; or help in the evacution, or fertilization, or develop- ment, of these germs. On the other hand, the correlative functions, so long as they are exerted by a simple undifferentiated morphological unit or cell, are of the simplest character, consisting of those modifications of position which can be effected by mere changes in the form or arrangement of the parts of the pro- toplasm, or of those prolongations of the protoplasm which are called pseudopodia or cilia, But, in the higher animals and plants, the movements of the organism and of its parts are brought about by the change of the form of certain tis- sues, the property of which is to shorten in one direction when exposed to certain stimuli. Such tissues are termed contractile ; and, in their most fully developed condition, muscular. The stimulus by which this contraction is natu- rally brought about is a molecular change, either in the sub- stance of the contractile tissue itself, or in some other part of the body ; in which latter case, the motion which is set up in that part of the body must be propagated to the contractile tissue through the intermediate substance of the body. In plants, there seems to be no question that parts which retain a hardly modified cellular structure may serve as channels for the transmission of this molecular motion ; whether the same is true of animals is not certain. But, in all the more com- plex animals, a peculiar fibrous tissue—mnerve—serves as the agent by which contractile tissue is affected by changes oc- curring elsewhere, and by which contractions thus initiated are codrdinated and brought into harmonious combination. While the sustentative functions in the higher forms of life are still, as in the lower, fundamentally dependent upon the powers inherent in all the physiological units which make up the body, the correlative functions are, in the former, deputed to two sets of specially modified units, which constitute the muscular and the nervous tissues. When the different forms of life are compared together as physiological machines, they are found to differ as machines of human construction do. In the lower forms, the mechan- ism, though perfectly well adapted to do the work fcr which it is required, is rough, simple, and weak; while, in the higher, it is finished, complicated, and powerful. Considered as machines, there is the same sort of difference between a polyp and a horse as there is between a distaff and a spin- ning-jenny. In the progress from the lower to the higher organism, there is a gradual differentiation of organs and of 30 THE ANATOMY OF INVERTEBRATED ANIMALS. functions. Each function is separated into many parts, which are severally intrusted to distinct organs. To use the strik- ing phrase of Milne-Edwards, in passing from low to high organisms, there is a division of physiological labor. And exactly the same process is observable in the development of any of the higher organisms; so that, physiologically as well as morphologically, development is a progress from the gen- eral to the special. Thus far, the physiological activities of living matter have been considered in themselves, and without reference to any- thing that may affect them in the world outside the living body. But living matter acts on, and is powerfully affected by, the bodies which surround it; and the study of the in- fluence of the “conditions of existence” thus determined constitutes a most important part of physiology. The sustentative functions, for example, can only be ex- erted under certain conditions of temperature, pressure, and light, in certain media, and with supplies of particular kinds of nutritive matter; the sufficiency of which supplies, again, is greatly influenced by the competition of other organisms, which, striving to satisfy the same needs, give rise to the passive ‘‘ struggle for existence.” The exercise of the correl- ative functions is influenced by similar conditions, and by the direct conflict with other organisms, which constitutes the ac- tive struggle for existence. And, finally, the generative func- tions are subject to extensive modifications, dependent partly upon what are commonly called external conditions, and part- ly upon wholly unknown agencies. In the lowest forms of life, the only mode of generation at present known is the division of the body into two or more parts, each of which then grows to the size and assumes the form of its parent, and repeats the process of multiplication. This method of multiplication by fission is properly called generation, because the parts which are separated are sevy- erally competent to give rise to individual organisms of the same nature as that from which they arose. In many of the lowest organisms the process is modified so far that, instead of the parent dividing into two equal parts, only a small portion of its substance is detached, as a bud, which develops into the likeness of its parent. This is generation by gemmation. Generation by fission and by gemmation is not confined to the simplest forms of life, however. On the contrary, both modes of multiplication are AGAMOGENESIS. 31 common not only among plants, but among animals of con- siderable complexity. The multiplication of flowering plants by bulbs, that of annelids by fission, and that of polyps by budding, are well- known examples of these modes of reproduction. In all these cases, the bud or the segment consists of a multitude of more or less metamorphosed cells. But, in other in- stances, a single cell detached from a mass of such undiffer- entiated cells contained in the parental organism is the foun- dation of the new organism, and it is hard to say whether such a detached cell may be more fitly called a bud or a segment —whether the process is more akin to fission or to gemma- tion. In all these cases the development of the new being from the detached germ takes place without the influence of other living matter. Common as the process is in plants and in the lower animals, it becomes rare among the higher animals. In these, the reproduction of the whole organism from a part, in the way indicated above, ceases. At most we find that the cells at the end of an amputated portion of the organism are capable of reproducing the lost part; in the very highest animals, even this power vanishes in the adult ; and, in most parts of the body, though the undifferentiated cells are capable of multiplication, their progeny grow, not into whole organisms like that of which they form a part, but into ele- ments of the tissues. Throughout almost the whole series of living beings, how- ever, we find concurrently with the process of agamogenesis, or asexual generation, another method of generation, in which the development of the germ into an organism resembling the parent depends on an influence exerted by living matter different from the germ. This is gamogenesis or sexual gen- eration. Looking at the facts broadly, and without reference to many exceptions in detail, it may be said that there is an inverse relation between agamogenetic and gamogenetic re- production. In the lowest organisms gamogenesis has not yet been observed, while in the highest agamogenesis is ab- sent. In many of the lower forms of life agamogenesis 1s the common and predominant mode of reproduction, while gamo- genesis is exceptional; on the contrary, in many of the high- er, while gamogenesis is the rule, agamogenesis takes place exceptionally. In its simplest condition, which is termed “ conjugation,” sexual generation consists in the coalescence of two similar 32 THE ANATOMY OF INVERTEBRATED ANIMALS. masses of protoplasmic matter, derived from different parts of the same organism, or from two organisms of the same species, and the single mass which results from the fusion develops into a new organism. In the majority of cases, however, there is a marked mor- phological difference between the two factors in the process, and then one is called the male, and the other the female, element. The female element is relatively large, and under- goes but little change of form. In all the higher plants and animals it is a nucleated cell, to which a greater or less amount of nutritive material, constituting a food-yelk, may be added. The male element, on the other hand, is relatively small. It may be conveyed to the female element by an outgrowth of the wall of its cell, which is short in many Alge and Fungi, but becomes an immensely elongated tubular filament, in the case of the pollen-cell of flowering plants. But, more com- monly, the protoplasm of the male cell becomes converted into rods or filaments, which usually are in active vibratile movement, and sometimes are propelled by numerous cilia. Occasionally, however, as in many Mematoidea and Arthro- poda, they are devoid of mobility. The manner in which the contents of the pollen-tube affect the embryo cell in flowering plants is unknown, as no perforation through, which the contents of the pollen-tube may pass, so as actually to mix with the substance of the em- bryo cell, has been discovered ; and there is the same diffi- culty with respect to the conjugative processes of some of the Cryptogamia. Butin the great majority of plants, and in all animals, there can be no doubt that the substance of the male element actually mixes with that of the female, so that, in all these cases, the sexual process remains one of con- jugation; and impregnation is the physical admixture of pro- toplasmic matter derived from two sources, which may be either different parts of the same organism, or different organ- isms, The effect of impregnation appears in all cases to be that the impregnated protoplasm tends to divide into portions (dlastomeres), which may remain united as a single cell-aggre- gate, or some or all of which may become separate organ- isms. A longer or shorter period of rest, in many cases, intervenes between the act of impregnation and the com- mencement of the process of division. As a general rule, the female cell, which directly receives GAMOGENESIS. 33 the influence of the male, is that which undergoes division and eventual development into independent germs; but there are some plants, such as the Jloridec, in which this is not the case. In these, the protoplasmic body of the trichogyne, which unites with the spermatozodids, does not undergo division itself, but transmits some influence to adjacent cells, in virtue of which they become subdivided into independent germs or spores. There is still much obscurity respecting the reproductive processes of the Infusoria ; but, in the Vorticellide, it would appear that conjugation merely determines a condition of the whole organism, which gives rise to the division of the endo- plast or so-called nucleus, by which germs are thrown off; and, if this be the case, the process would have some analogy to what takes place in the /loridee. On the other hand, the process of conjugation by which two distinct Diporpwe combine into that extraordinary double organism, the Diplozoin paradoxum, does not directly give rise to germs, but determines the development of the sexual organs in each of the conjugated individuals; and the same process takes place in a large number of the Jnfusoria, if what are supposed to be male sexual elements in them are really such. The process of impregnation in the Floridee is remark- ably interesting, from its bearing upon the changes which fecundation is known to produce upon parts of the parental organism other than the ovum, even in the highest animals and plants. The nature of the influence exerted by the male element upon the female is wholly unknown. No morphological dis- tinction can be drawn between those cells which are capable of reproducing the whole organism without impregnation and those which need it, as is obvious from what happens in insects, where eggs which ordinarily require impregnation, exceptionally, as in many moths, or regularly, as in the case of the drones among bees, develop without impregnation. Even in the higher animals, such as the fowl, the earlier stages of division of the germ may take place without im- pregnation. In fact, generation may be regarded as a particular case of cell-multiplication, and impregnation simply as one of the many conditions which may determine or affect that process. In the lowest organisms the simple protoplasmic mass divides, and each part retains all the physiological properties of the 34 THE ANATOMY OF INVERTEBRATED ANIMALS. whole, and consequently constitutes a germ whence the whole body can be reproduced. In more advanced organisms each of the multitude of cells into which the embryo cell is converted at first, probably retains all, or nearly all, the physiological capabilities of the whole, and is capable of serving as a re- productive germ; but, as division goes on, and many of the cells which result from division acquire special morphological and physiological properties, it seems not improbable that they, in proportion, lose their more general characters. In propor- tion, for example, as the tendency of a given cell to become a muscle-cell or a cartilage-cell is more marked and definite, it is readily conceivable that its primitive capacity to reproduce the whole organism should be reduced, though it might not be altogether abolished. If this view is well based, the power of reproducing the whole organism would be limited to those cells which had acquired no special tendencies, and conse- quently had retained all the powers of the primitive cell in which the organism commenced its existence. The more ex- tensively diffused such cells were, the more generally might multiplication by budding or fission take place; the more lo- calized, the more limited would be the parts of the organism in which such a process would take place. And, even where such cells occurred, their development or non-development might be connected with conditions of nutrition. It depends on the nutriment supplied to the female larva of a bee wheth- er it shall become a neuter or a sexually perfect female; and the sexual perfection of a large proportion of the internal parasites is similarly dependent upon their food, and perhaps on other conditions, such as the temperature of the medium in which they live. Thus the gradual disappearance of aga- mogenesis in the higher animals would be related with that increasing specialization of function which is their essential characteristic ; and, when it ceases to occur altogether, it may be supposed that no cells are left which retain unmodified the powers of the primitive embryo cell. The organism is like a society in which every one is so engrossed by his spe- cial business that he has neither time nor inclination to marry. Even the female elements in the highest organisms, little as they differ to all appearance from undifferentiated cells, and though they are directly derived from epithelial cells which have undergone very little modification from the condi- tion of blastomeres, are incapable of full development unless they are subjected to the influence of the male element, which may, .as Caspar Wolff suggested, be compared to a kind of THE ALTERNATION OF GENERATIONS. 35 nutriment. But it is a living nutriment, in some respects comparable to that which would be supplied to an animal kept alive by transfusion, and its molecules transfer to the impregnated embryo cell all the special characters of the or- ganism to which it belonged. The tendency of the germ to reproduce the characters of its immediate parents, combined, in the case of sexual genera- tion, with the tendency to reproduce the characters of the male, is the source of the singular phenomena of hereditary transmission. No structural modification is so slight, and no functional peculiarity is so insignificant in either parent, that it may not make its appearance in the offspring. But the transmission of parental peculiarities depends greatly upon the manner in which they have been acquired. Such as have arisen naturally, and have been hereditary through many an- tecedent generations, tend to appear in the progeny with great force ; while artificial modifications—such, for example, as result from mutilation—are rarely, if ever, transmitted. Circumcision through innumerable ancestral generations does not appear to have reduced that rite to a mere formality, as it should have done if the abbreviated prepuce had become hereditary in the descendants of Abraham ; while modern lambs are born with long tails, notwithstanding the long-con- tinued practice of cutting those of every generation short. And it remains to be seen whether the supposed hereditary transmission of the habit of retrieving among dogs is really what it seems at first sight to be ; on the other side, Brown- Séquard’s case of the transmission of artificially-induced epi- lepsy in Guinea-pigs is undoubtedly very weighty. Although the germ always tends to reproduce, directly or indirectly, the organism from which it is derived, the result of its development differs somewhat from the parent. Usually the amount of variation is insignificant ; but it may be con- siderable, as in the so-called “sports ;” and such variations, whether useful or useless, may be transmitted with great te- nacity to the offspring of the subjects of them. In many plants and animals which multiply both asexually and sexually there is no definite relation between the aga- mogenetic and the gamogenetic phenomena. The organism may multiply asexually before, or after, or ccncurrently with, the occurrence of sexual generation. But in a great many of the lower organisms, both animal and vegetable, the organism (A) which results from the im- pregnated germ produces offspring only agamogenetically. 36 THE ANATOMY OF INVERTEBRATED ANIMALS. It thus gives rise to a series of independent organisms (B, B, B,...), which are more or less different from A, and which sooner or later acquire generative organs. From their impregnated germs A is reproduced. The process thus de- . scribed is what has been termed the “alternation of genera- tions ” under its simplest form—for example, as it is exhibited by the Salpew. In more complicated cases the independent organisms which correspond with B may give rise agamo- genetically to others (B,), and these to others (B,), and so on (e. g., Aphis), But, however long the series, a final term appears which develops sexual organs, and reproduces A, The “alternation of generations ” is, therefore, in strictness, an alternation of asexual with sexual generation, in which the products of the one process differ from those of the other. The Hydrozoa offer a complete series of gradations be- tween those cases in which the term B is represented by a free, self-nourishing organism (e. g., Cyanea), through those in which it is free but unable to feed itself (Calycophoride), to those in which the sexual elements are developed in bodies which resemble free zodids, but are never detached, and are mere generative organs of the body on which they are devel- oped ( Cordylophora). In the last case the “ individual” is the total product of the development of the impregnated embryo, all the parts of which remain in material continuity with one another. The multiplication of mouths and stomachs in a Cordylophora no more makes it an aggregation of different individuals than the multiplication of segments and legs in a centipede con- verts that Arthropod into a compound animal. The Cordy- lophora is a differentiation of a whole into many parts, and the use of any terminology which implies that it results from the coalescence of many parts into a whole is to be depre- cated. In Cordylophora the generative organs are incapable of maintaining a separate existence ; but in nearly-allied Hydro- zoa the unquestionable homologues of these organs become free zodids, in many cases capable of feeding and growing, and developing the sexual elements only after they have un- dergone considerable changes of form. Morphologically, the swarm of Medusew thus set free from a Hydrozoén are as much organs of the latter as the multitudinous pinnules of a Comatula, with their genital glands, are organs of the Echi- noderm. Morphologically, therefore, the equivalent of the CAUSES OF THE PHENOMENA OF LIFE. 37 individual Comatula is the Hydrozoic stock plus all the Me- dusce which proceed from it. No doubt it sounds paradoxical to speak of a million of Aphides, for example, as parts of one morphological individ- ual; but beyond the momentary shock of the paradox no harm is done. On the other hand, if the asexual Aphides are held to be individuals, it follows, as a logical consequence, not only that all the polyps on a Cordylophora tree are ‘feeding individuals,” and all the genital sacs “ generative individuals,” while the stem must be a ‘‘ stump individual,” but that the eyes and legs of a lobster are ‘‘ ocular” and ‘‘ locomotive individuals.” And this conception is not only somewhat more paradoxical than the other, but suggests a conception of the origin of the complexity of animal struct- ure which is wholly inconsistent with fact. IV. A‘ TIOLOGY. Morphology, cistribution, and physiology, investigate and determine the facts of biology. Aitiology has for its object the ascertainment of the causes of these facts, and the ex- planation of biological phenomena, by showing that they con- stitute particular cases of general physical laws. It is hardly needful to say that etiology, as thus conceived, is in its in- fancy, and that the seething controversies, to which the attempt to found this branch of science made in the ‘‘ Origin of Species” has given rise, cannot be dealt with in this place. At most, the general nature of the problems to be solved, and the course of inquiry needful for their solution, may be indi- cated. - In any investigation into the causes of the phenomena of life, the first question which arises is, Whether we have any knowledge, and if so, what knowledge, of the origin of living matter ? In the case of all conspicuous and easily-studied organ- isms, it has been obvious, since the study of Nature began, that living beings arise by generation from living beings of a like kind; but, before the latter part of the seventeenth cen- tury, learned and unlearned alike shared the conviction that this rule was not of universal application, and that multitudes of the smaller and more obscure organisms were produced by the fermentation of not-living, and especially of putrefying dead matter, by what was then termed generatio wquivoca or spontanea, and is now called abiogenesis. Redi showed 38 THE ANATOMY OF INVERTEBRATED ANIMALS. that the general belief was erroneous in a multitude of in- stances ; Spallanzani added largely to the list; while the in- vestigations of the scientific helminthologists of the present century have eliminated a further category of cases in which it was possible to doubt the applicability of the rule “omne vivum e vivo” to the more complex organisms which consti- tute the present fauna and flora of the earth. Even the most extravagant supporters of abiogenesis at the present day do not pretend that organisms of higher rank than the lowest Fungi and Protozoa are produced otherwise than by genera- tion from preéxisting organisms. But it is pretended that Bacteria, Torule, certain Fungi, and “Monads,” are de- veloped under conditions which render it impossible that these organisms should have proceeded directly from living matter. The experimental evidence adduced in favor of this prop- osition is always of one kind, and the reasoning on which the conclusion that abiogenesis occurs is based may be stated in the following form : All living matter is killed by being heated to m degrees. The contents of a vessel, the entry of germs from without into which is prevented, have been heated to m degrees. Therefore, all living matter which may have existed there- in has been killed. But living Bacteria, etc., have appeared in these contents subsequently to their being heated. Therefore, they have been formed abiogenetically. No objection ean be taken to the logical form of this rea- soning, but it is obvious that its applicability to any particu- lar case depends entirely upon the validity, in that case,-of the first and second propositions. Suppose a fluid to be full of Bacteria in active motion, what evidence have we that they are killed when that fluid is heated to nm degrees? There is but one kind of conclusive evidence, namely, that from that time forth no living Bacteria make their appearance in the liquid, supposing it to be prop- erly protected from the intrusion of fresh Bacteria. The only other evidence, that, for example, which may be fur- nished by the cessation of the motion of the Bacteria, and such slight changes as our microscopes permit us to observe in their optical characters, is simply presumptive evidence of death, and no more conclusive than the stillness and paleness of a man in a swoon are proof that he is dead. And the caution is the more necessary in the case of Bacteria, since ABIOGENESIS. 39 many of them naturally pass a considerable part of their ex- istence in a condition in which they show no marks of life whatever save growth and multiplication. If indeed it could be proved that, in cases which are not open to doubt, living matter is always and invariably killed at precisely the same temperature, there might be some ground for the assumption that, in those which are obscure, death must take place under the same circumstances, But what are the facts? It has already been pointed out that, leaving Bacteria aside, the range of high temperatures be- tween the lowest, at which some living things are certainly killed, and the highest, at which others certainly live, is rather more than 100° Fahr., that is to say, between 104° Fahr. and 208° Fahr. It makes no sort of difference to the argument how living beings have come to be able to bear such a tem- perature as the last mentioned ; the fact that they do so is sufficient to prove that, under certain conditions, such a tem- perature is-not sufficient to destroy life.’ Thus it appears that there is no ground for the aeceeng fia that all living matter is killed at some given temperature be- tween 104° and 208° Fahr. No experimental evidence that a liquid may be heated to n degrees, and yet subsequently give rise to living organisms, is of the smallest value as proof that abiogenesis has taken place, and for two reasons: Firstly, there is no proof that organisms of the kind in question are dead, except their per- manent incapacity to grow and reproduce their kind ; and, secondly, since we know that conditions may largely modify the power of resistance of such organisms to heat, it is far more probable that such conditions existed in the experiment in question, than that the organisms were generated afresh out of dead matter. Not only is the kind of evidence adduced in favor of abiogenesis logically insufficient to furnish proof of its occur- rence, but it may be stated, as a well-based induction, that the more careful the investigator, and the more complete his mastery over the endless practical difficulties which surround experimentation on this subject, the more certain are his ex- periments to give a negative result ; while positive results are no less sure to crown the efforts of the clumsy and the careless. 1 Messrs. Patines and Drysdale have recently shown Bpod grounds for believing that the germs of some Monads are not destroyed by exposure to a temperature of 260° Fahr. or even 300° Fahr. - 40 THE ANATOMY OF INVERTEBRATED ANIMALS. It is argued that a belief in abiogenesis is a necessary corollary from the doctrine of Evolution, This may be true of the occurrence of abiogenesis at some time; but if the present day, or any recorded epoch of geological time, be in question, the exact contrary holds good. If all living beings have been evolved from preéxisting forms of life, it is enough that a single particle of living protoplasm should once have appeared on the globe, as the result of no matter what agency. In the eyes of a consistent evolutionist, any further indepen- dent formation of protoplasm would be sheer waste. The production of living matter since the time of its first appearance, only by way of biogenesis, implies that the spe- cific forms of the lower kinds of life have undergone but little change in the course of geological time, and this is said to be inconsistent with the doctrine of evolution. But, in the first place, the fact is not inconsistent with the doctrine of evolu- tion properly understood, that doctrine being perfectly con- sistent with either the progression, the retrogression, or the stationary condition, of any particular species for indefinite periods of time ; and, secondly, if it were, it would be so much the worse for the doctrine of evolution, inasmuch as it is un- questionably true that certain, even highly-organized, forms of life have persisted without any sensible change for very long periods. The Zerebratula psittacea of the present day, for example, is not distinguishable from that of the Cretaceous epoch, while the highly-organized Teleostean fish, Berya, of the Chalk, differed only in minute specific characters from that which now lives. Is it seriously suggested that the ex- isting Terebratule and Beryces are not the lineal descendants of their Cretaceous ancestors, but that their modern repre- sentatives have been independently developed from primordial germs in the interval? But if this is too fantastic a sugges- tion for grave consideration, why are we to believe that the Globigerine of the present day are not lineally descended from the Cretaceous forms? And, if their unchanged genera- tions have succeeded one another for all the enormous time represented by the deposition of the Chalk and that of the Tertiary and Quaternary deposits, what difficulty is there in supposing that they may not have persisted unchanged for a greatly longer period ? The fact is, that at the present moment there is not a shadow of trustworthy direct evidence that abiogenesis does take place, or has taken place, within the period during which the existence of life on the globe is recorded. But it ORIGIN OF SPECIES. 41 need hardly be pointed out that the fact does not in the slightest degree interfere with any conclusion that may be arrived at, deductively, from other considerations that, at some time or other, abiogenesis must have taken place. If the hypothesis of evolution is true, living matter must have arisen from not-living matter; for, by the hypothesis, the condition of the globe was at one time such that living matter could not have existed in it,’ life being entirely in- compatible with the gaseous state. But, living matter once originated, there is no necessity for another origination, since the hypothesis postulates the unlimited, though perhaps not indefinite, modifiability of such matter. Of the causes which have led to the origination of living matter, then, it may be said that we know absolutely nothing. But postulating the existence of living matter endowed with that power of hereditary transmission, and with that tendency to vary which is found in all such matter, Mr. Darwin has shown good reasons for believing that the interaction between living matter and surrounding conditions, which results in the survival of the fittest, is sufficient to account for the gradual evolution of plants and animals from their simplest to their most complicated forms, and for the known phe- nomena of Morphology, Physiology, and Distribution. Mr. Darwin has further endeavored to give a physical explanation of hereditary transmission by his hypothesis of Pangenesis; while he seeks for the principal, if not the only cause of variation in the influence of changing condi- tions. It is on this point that the chief divergence exists among those who accept the doctrine of evolution in its general outlines. Three views may be taken of the causes of varia- tion : 7 a. In virtue of its molecular structure, the organism may tend to vary. This variability may either be indefinite, or may be limited to certain directions by intrinsic conditions. In the former case, the result of the struggle for existence would be the survival of the fittest among an indefinite number of varieties; in the latter case, it would be the survival of the fittest among a certain set of varieties, the 11 makes no difference if we adopt Sir W. Thomson’s hypothesis, and suppose that the germs of living things have been transported to our globe from some other, seeing that there is as much reason for supposing that all stellar and planetary components of the universe are or have been gaseous, as that the earth has passed through this stage. 42 THE ANATOMY OF INVERTEBRATED ANIMALS. “nature and number of which would be predetermined by the molecular structure of the organism. b. The organism may have no intrinsic tendency to vary, but variation may be brought about by the influence of con- ditions external to it. And in this case, also, the variability induced may be either indefinite or defined by intrinsic limi- tation. c. The two former cases may be combined, and variation may to some extent depend upon intrinsic, and to some ex- tent upon extrinsic, conditions. At present it can hardly be said that such evidence as would justify the positive adoption of any one of these views exists. If all living beings have come into existence by the gradual modification, through a long series of generations, of a pri- mordial living matter, the phenomena of embryonic develop- ment ought to be explicable as particular cases of the general law of hereditary transmission. On this view, a tadpole is first a fish, and then a tailed amphibian, provided with both gills and lungs, before it becomes a frog, because the frog was the last term in a series of modifications whereby some ancient fish became a urodele amphibian; and the urodele amphibian became an anurous amphibian. In fact, the de- velopment of the embryo is a recapitulation of the ancestral history of the species. If this be so, it follows that the development of any organism should furnish the key to its ancestral history; and the attempt to decipher the full pedigree of organisms from so much of the family history as is recorded in their develop- ment has given rise to a special branch of biological specula- tion, termed phylogeny. In practice, however, the reconstruction of the pedigree of a group from the developmental history of its existing mem- bers is fraught with difficulties. It is highly probable that the series of developmental stages of the individual organism never presents more than an abbreviated and condensed sum- mary of ancestral conditions; while this summary is often strangely modified by variation and adaptation to conditions ; and it must be confessed that, in most cases, we can do little better than guess what is genuine recapitulation of ancestral forms, and what is the effect of comparatively late adapta- ' tion. The only perfectly safe foundation for the doctrine of evolu- tion lies in the historical, or rather archzeological, evidence PHYLOGENY. 43 that particular organisms have arisen by the gradual modifi- cation of their predecessors, which is furnished by fossil remains. That evidence is daily increasing in amount and in weight; and it is to be hoped that the comparison of the actual pedigree of these organisms with the phenomena of their development may furnish some criterion by which the validity of phylogenetic conclusions, deduced from the facts of embryology alone, may be satisfactorily tested. CHAPTER I. I.—THE DISTINCTIVE CHARACTERS OF ANIMALS, THE more complicated forms of the living things, the general characters of which have now been discussed, appear to be readily distinguishable into widely-separated groups, animals, and plants. The latter have no power of locomo- tion, and only rarely exhibit any distinct movement of their parts when these are irritated, mechanically or otherwise. They are devoid of any digestive cavity; and the matters which serve as their nutriment are absorbed in the gaseous and fluid state. Ordinary animals, on the contrary, not only possess conspicuous locomotive activity, but their parts readily alter their form or position when irritated. Their nutriment, consisting of other animals or of plants, is taken in the solid form into a digestive cavity. But even without descending to the very lowest forms of animals and plants, we meet with facts which weaken the force of these apparently broad distinctions. Among animals, a coral or an oyster is as incapable of locomotion as an oak; and a tape-worm feeds by imbibition and not by the ingestion of solid matter. On the other hand, the Sensitive-Plant and the Sundew exhibit movements on irritation, and the recent observatious of Mr. Darwin and others leave little doubt that the so-called “insectivorous plants ” really digest and assimi- late the nutritive matters contained in the living animals which they catch and destroy. All the higher animals are dependent for the protein compounds which they contain upon other animals or upon plants. They are unable to man- ufacture protein out of simpler substances; and, although positive proof is wanting that this incapacity extends to all animals, it may safely be assumed to exist in all those forms of animal life which take in solid nutriment, or which live parasitically on other animals or plants, in situations in which they are provided with abundant supplies of protein in a dissolved state. THE DISTINCTIVE CHARACTERS OF ANIMALS. 45 The great majority of the higher plants, on the contrary, are able to manufacture protein when supplied with carbonic acid, ammoniacal salts, water, and sundry mineral phosphates and sulphates, obtaining the carbon which they require by the decomposition of the carbonic acid, the oxygen of which is disengaged. One essential factor in the performance of this remarkable chemical process is the chlorophyll which these plants contain, and another is the sun’s light. Certain animals (dnfusoria, Coelenterata, Turbellaria) possess chlorophyll, but there is no evidence to show what part it plays in their economy. Some of the higher plants when parasitic, and a great group of the lower plants, the Fungi (which may be parasitic or not), are, however, devoid of chlorophyll, and are consequently totally unable to derive the carbon which they need from carbonic acid. Nevertheless they are sharply distinguished from animals, inasmuch as they are still, for the most part, manufacturers of protein. Thus such a Fungus as Penicillium is able to fabricate all the con- stituents of its body out of ammonium tartrate, sulphate, and phosphate, dissolved in water (see supra, p. 14, note); and the yeast-plant flourishes and multiplies with exceeding rapid- ity in water containing sugar, ammonium tartrate, potassium phosphate, calcium phosphate, and magnesium sulphate. Nevertheless, the experiments of Mayer have shown that when peptones are substituted for the ammonium tartrate, the nutrition of the yeast-plant is favored instead of being impeded. So that it would seem that the yeast-plant is able to take in protein compounds and assimilate them, as if it were an animal ; and there can be no reasonable doubt that many parasitic Fungi, such as the Botrytis Bassiana of the silk-worm caterpillar, the Himpusa of the house-fly, and, very probably, the Peronospora of the potato-plant, directly as- similate the protein substances contained in the bodies of the plants and animals which they infest ; nor is it clear that these Fungi are able to maintain themselves upon less fully elaborated nutriment. Cellulose, amyloid, and saccharine compounds were former- ly supposed to be characteristically vegetable products ; but cellulose is found in the tests of Ascidians; and amyloid and saccharine matters are of very wide, if not universal, occur- rence in animals. And on taking a comprehensive survey of the whole ani- mal and vegetable worlds, the test of locomotion breaks down as completely as does that of nutrition. For it is the rule 46 THE ANATOMY OF INVERTEBRATED ANIMALS. rather than the exception among the lowest plants, that at one stage or other of their existence they should be actively locomotive, their motor organs being usually cia, altogether similar in character and function to the motor organs of the lowest animals, Moreover, the protoplasmic substance of the body in many of these plants exhibits rhythmically pulsating spaces or contractile vacuoles of the same nature as those characteristic of so many animals. No better illustration of the impossibility of drawing any sharply-defined distinction between animals and plants can be found than that which is supplied by the history of what are commonly termed “ Monads.” The name of ‘‘Monad”* has been commonly applied to minute free or fixed, rounded or oval bodies, provided with one or more long cilia (flagella), and usually provided with a nucleus and a contractile vacuole. Of such bodies, all of which would properly come under the old group of Monadi- de, the history of a few has been completely worked out ; and the result is that, while some (e. g., Chlamydomonas, zodspores of Peronospora and Coleochete) are locomotive conditions of indubitable plants, others (adiolaria, Nocti- luca) are embryonic conditions of as indubitable animals. Yet others (zodspores of Myxomycetes) are embryonic forms of organisms which appear to be as much animals as plants ; inasmuch as in one condition they take in solid nutriment, and in another have the special morphological, if not physio- logical peculiarities of plants; while, lastly, in the case of such monads as those recently so carefully studied by Messrs. Dallinger and Drysdale, the morphological characters of which are on the whole animal, while their mode of nutrition is un- known, it is impossible to say whether they should be regarded as animals or as plants, Thus, traced down to their lowest terms, the series of plant forms gradually lose more and more of their distinctive vegetable features, while the series of animal forms part with more and more of their distinctive animal characters, and the two series converge to acommon term. The most character- istic morphological peculiarity of the plant is the investment of each of its component cells by a sac, the walls of which contain cellulose, or some closely analogous compound ; and _.O, F. Miller, ‘‘ Historia Vermium,” 1773. ‘ Vermis inconspicuus, sim- plicissimus, pellucidus, punctiformis.” MORPHOLOGICAL DIFFERENTIATION. 47 the most characteristic physiological peculiarity of the plant is its power of manufacturing, protein from chemical com- pounds of a less complex nature. The most characteristic morphological peculiarity of the animal is the absence of any such cellulose investment.* The most characteristic physiological peculiarity of the animal is its want of power to manufacture protein out of simpler compounds. The great majority of living things are at once referable to one of the two categories thus defined ; but there are some in which the presence of one or other characteristic mark cannot be ascertained, and others which appear at different periods of their existence to belong to different categories. Il.—THE MORPHOLOGICAL DIFFERENTIATION OF ANIMALS, The simplest form of animal life imaginable would be a protoplasmic body, devoid of motility, maintaining itself by the ingestion of such proteinaceous, fatty, amyloid, and min- eral matters as might be brought into contact with it by ex- ternal agencies; and increasing by simple extension of its mass. But no animal of this degree of simplicity is known to exist. The very humblest animals with which we are ac- quainted exhibit contractility, and not only increase in size, but, as they grow, divide, and thus undergo multiplication. In the simplest known animals—the Protozoa—the proto- plasmic substance of the body does not become differentiated into discrete nucleated masses cr cells, which by their meta- morphosis give rise to the different tissues of which the adult body is composed. And, in the lowest of the Protozoa, the body has neither a constant form nor any further distinction of parts than a greater density of the peripheral, as com- pared with the central, part of the protoplasm. The first steps in complication are the appearance of one or more rhythmically contractile vacuoles, such as are found in some of the lower plants ; and the segregation of part of the in- 1 No analysis of the substance composing the cysts in which so many of the Protozoa inclose themselves temporarily has yet been made. But it is not im- probable that it may be analogous to chitin ; and, if so, it is worthy of remark that, though chitin is a nitrogenous body, it readily yields a substance appar- ently identical with cellulose when heated with the double paige of copper and ammonia. It is possible, therefore, that the difference between the chitinous investment of an animal and the cellulose investment of a plant may depend upon the proportion of nitrogenous matter which is present in each case in addition to the chitin. 48 THE ANATOMY OF INVERTEBRATED ANIMALS. terior protoplasm as a rounded mass, the “endoplast” or “nucleus.” Other Protozoa advance further and acquire permanent locomotive organs. These may be developed only on one part of the surface of the body, which may be modified into a special organ for their support. In some, a pedicle of attachment is formed, and the body may acquire a dense envelope (Jnfusoria), or secrete an internal skeleton of calcareous or silicious matter (Foraminifera, Radiolaria), or fabricate such a skeleton by gluing together extraneous par- ticles (Foraminifera). A mouth and gullet, with an anal aperture, may be formed, and the permeable soft central portion of the protoplasm may be so limited as to give rise to a virtual alimentary tract be- tween these two apertures. The contractile vacuole may be developed into a complicated system of canals (Parameeci- um), and the endoplast may take on more and more definite- ly the characters of a reproductive organ, that is, may be the focus of origin of germs capable of reproducing the individ- ual ( Vorticella). In fact, rudiments of all the chief system of organs of the higher animals, with the exception, more or less doubtful, of the nervous, are thus sketched out in the Protozoa, just as the organs of the higher plants are sketched out in Caulerpa. In the Metazoa, which constitute the rest of the animal kingdom, the animal, in its earliest condition, is a protoplas- mic mass with a nucleus—is, in short, a Protozo6n. But it never acquires the morphological complexity of its adult state by the direct metamorphosis of the protoplasmic matter of this nucleated body—the ovwm—into the different tissues. On the contrary, the first step in the development of all the Metazoa is the conversion of the single nucleated body into an ageresation of such bodies of smaller size—the Morula— by a process of division, which usually takes place with great regularity, the ovum dividing first into two segments, which then subdivide, giving rise to four, eight, sixteen, etc., portions, which are the so-called division masses or blasto- meres. A similar process takes place in sundry Protozoa and gives rise to a protozoic aggregate, which is strictly comparable to the Morula. But the members of the protozoic aggregate become separate, or at any rate independent existences. What distinguishes the metazoic aggregate is that, though its - component blastomeres also retain a certain degree of physi- ological independence, they remain united into one morpho- MORPHOLOGICAL DIFFERENTIATION. 49 logical whole, and their several metamorphoses are so ordered and related to one another that they constitute members of a mutually dependent commonalty, The Metazoa are the only animals which fall under com- mon observation, and have therefore been known from the earliest times. All the higher languages possess general names equivalent to our beast, bird, reptile, fish, insect, and worm; and this shows the very early perception of the fact that, notwithstanding the wonderful diversity of animal forms, they are modeled upon comparatively few great types. In the middle of the last century the founder of modern Taxonomy, Linnzeus, distinguished animals into Mammalia, Aves, Amphibia, Pisces, Insecta, and Vermes, that is to say, he converted common-sense into science by defining and giv- ing precision to the rough distinctions arrived at by ordinary observation. At the end of the century, Lamarck made a most impor- tant advance in general morphology, by pointing out that mammals, birds, reptiles, and fishes, are formed upon one type or common plan, the essential character of which is the pos- session of a spinal column, interposed between a cerebro-spi- nal and a visceral cavity; and that in no other animals is the same plan of construction to be discerned. Hence he drew a broad distinction between the former and the latter, as the VERTEBRATA and the INvERTEBRATA. But the advance of knowledge respecting the structure of invertebrated animals, due chiefly to Swammerdam, Trembley, Réaumur, Peyssonel, Goeze, Roesel, Ellis, Fabricius, O. F. Miller, Lyonet, Pallas, and Cuvier, speedily proved that the Invertebrata are not framed upon one fundamental plan, but upon several ; and, in 1795, Cuvier’ showed that, at fewest, three morphological types, as distinct from one another as they are from that of the vertebrated animals, are distinguishable among the Jn- vertebrata. These he named—I. Mollusques ; II. Insectes et Vers ; III. Zoophytes. In the “ Régne animal” (1816), those terms are Latinized, Animalia Mollusca, Articulata, and Ra- diata. Thus, says Cuvier: “It will be found that there ex- ist four principal forms, four general plans, if it may thus be expressed, on which all animals appear to have been modeled ; and the ulterior divisions of which, under whatever title natu- ralists may have designated them, are merely slight modifica- tions, founded on the development or addition of certain parts. 1 Tableau élémentaire de l’Histoire des Animaux. An vi. 3 50 THE ANATOMY OF INVERTEBRATED ANIMALS. These four common plans are those of the Vertebrata, the Mor lusca, the Articulata, and the Radiata.” For extent, variety, and exactness of knowledge, Cuvier was, beyond all comparison, the greatest anatomist who has ever lived; but the absence of two conditions rendered it impossible that his survey of the animal kingdom should be exhaustive, grand and comprehensive as it was. Up to the time of Cuvier’s death in 1832, microscopic in- vestigation was in-its infancy, and hence the great majority of the lowest forms were either unknown or little understood; and it was only in the third decade of the present century that Rathke, Déllinger, and Von Baer, commenced that won- derful series of exact researches into embryology which Von Baer organized into a special branch of morphology, develop- ing all its most important consequences and raising it to its proper position, as the criterion of morphological theories. Upon embryological grounds Von Baer arrived at the same conclusion as Cuvier, that there are four common plans of animal structure. In the course of the last half-century the activity of anat- omists and embryologists has been prodigious, and it may be reasonably doubted whether any form of animal life re- mains to be discovered which will not be found to accord with one or other of the common plans now known. But at the same time this increase of knowledge has abolished the broad lines of demarkation which formerly appeared to sepa- rate one common plan from another. Even the hiatus between the Vertebrata and the Jnver- tebrata is partly, if not wholly, bridged over; and though among the Jnvertebrata there is no difficulty in distinguish- ing the more completely differentiated representatives of such types or common plans as those of the Arthropoda, the Annelida, the Mollusca, the Tunicata, the Echinodermata, the Coelenterata, and the Porifera, yet every year brings forth fresh evidence to the effect that, just as the plan of the plant is not absolutely distinct from that of the animal, so that of the Vertebrate has its points of community with that of certain of the Invertebrates; that the Arthropod, the Mol- lusk, and the Echinoderm plans are united by that of the lower worms; and that the plan of the latter is separated by no very great differences from that of the Coelenterate and that of the Sponge. Whatever speculative views may be held or rejected as t the origin of the diversities of animal form, the facts of anat- -ANNULOSE DIFFERENTIATION. 51 omy and development compel the morphologist to regard the whole of the Metazoa as modifications of one actual or ideal primitive type, which is a sac with a double cellular wall, inclosing a central cavity and open at one end. This is what Haeckel terms a Gastrea. ‘The inner wall of the sac is the hypoblast (endoderm of the adult), the outer the epiblast (ectoderm). Between the two, in all but the very lowest Metazoa, a third layer, the mesoblast (mesoderm of the adult), makes its appearance. In the Portfera, the terminal aperture of the gastraea becomes the egestive opening of the adult animal, and the ingestive apertures are numerous secondary pore-like aper- tures formed by the separation of adjacent cells of the ec- toderm and endoderm. ‘The body may become variously branched, a fibrous or spicular endoskeleton is usually de- veloped in the ectoderm, and no perivisceral cavity is de- veloped. There are no appendages for locomotion or pre- hension; no nervous system nor sensory organs are known to exist; nor are there any circulatory, respiratory, renal, or generative organs. In the Coelenterata, the terminal aperture of the gastrea becomes the mouth, and, if pores perforate the body-walls, they do not subserve the ingestion of food. There is no sep- arate perivisceral cavity, but, in many, an enteroceee or sys- tem of cavities, continuous with, but more or less separate from, the digestive cavity, extends through the body. Pre- hensile appendages, tentacula, are developed in great variety. A chitinous exoskeleton appears in some, a calcareous or chit- inous endoskeleton in others, There are no circulatory, re- spiratory, or renal organs (though it is possible that certain cells in the Porpitw, e. g., may have a uropoietic function); but special genital organs make their appearance, as do a definitely-arranged nervous system and organs of sense. The lowest Turbellaria are on nearly the same grade of organization as the lower Celenterata, but the thick meso- derm is traversed by canals which constitute a water-vascular system. In the adult state these canals open, on the one side, into the interstices of the mesodermal tissues, and, on the other, communicate with the exterior. Their analogy to the contractile vacuoles of the Infusoria on the one hand, and to the segmental organs of the Annelids on the other, lead me to think that they are formed by a splitting of the mesoblast, and that they thus represent that form of perivisceral cavity which I have termed a schizocwle. A nervous system, con- 52 THE ANATOMY OF INVERTEBRATED ANIMALS. sisting of a single or double ganglion with two principal lon- gitudinal nerve-cords, is found in many ; and there may be eyes and auditory sacs. Upon this foundation a gradual complication of form is based, brought about by— 1. The elongation of the bilaterally symmetrical body and the formation of a chitinous exoskeleton. 2. The development of a secondary aperture near the an- terior end of the body, which becomes the permanent mouth. 3. The division of the mesoblast into successive segments (somites). 4, The development of two nervous ganglia in each somite. 5. The outgrowth of a pair of appendages from each so- mite, and their segmentation. 6. The gradual specialization of the somites into cephalic, thoracic and abdominal groups ; and that of their appendages into sense organs, Jaws, locomotive limbs, and respiratory or- cans. ~The conversion of the schizoccele into a spacious peri- visceral cavity containing blood; the reduction of the water- vascular system, and the appearance of pseudo-hzmal vessels ; and the replacement of these, in the higher forms, by a heart, arteries, and veins, which contain blood. 8. The conversion of the simple inner sac of the gastrzea into a highly-complex alimentary canal, with special glandu- lar appendages, representing the liver and the kidneys. 9. A similar differentiation of the genital apparatus. 10. A gradual complication of the eye, which, in its most perfect form, presents a series of crystal-clear conical rods, disposed perpendicularly to the transparent corneal region of the chitinous exoskeleton, and connected by their inner ends with the optic nerves of the prae-cesophageal ganglia. By such modifications as these the plan of the simple Turbellarian gradually passes into that of the highest Ar- thropod. Starting from the same point, if the mesoblast does not become distinctly segmented ; if few, probably not more ~ than three, pairs of ganglia are formed ; if there are no seg- mented appendages, but the chief locomotive organ is a mus- cular foot developed in the neural aspect of the body; if, in the place of the chitinous exoskeleton, a shell is secreted by a specially modified part of the hemal wall termed the man- tle; if the schizoccele is converted into a blood-cavity, which communicates with the exterior by an organ of Bojanus, which ss THE PLAN OF THE ECHINODERMS. 53 appears to represent the water-vascular system and the seg- mental organs ; and if, along with these changes, the aliment- ary, circulatory, respiratory, genital, and sensory organs take on special characters, we arrive at the complete Molluscan lan. b From the Turbellarian to the Tunicate, or Ascidian, the passage is indicated, if not effected, by Balanoglossus, which, in its larval state, is comparable to an Appendicularia with- out its caudal appendage. On the other hand, the large pharynx of the 7unitcatu and the circle of tentacula around the oral aperture, with the single ganglion, approximate them to the Polyzoa. In the perforation of the pharynx by lateral apertures, which communicate with the exterior, either di- rectly or by the intermediation of an atrial cavity, the Z’uni- cata resemble only Balanoglossus and the Vertebrata. The axial skeleton of the caudal appendage has no parallel except in the vertebrate notochord. In the structure of the heart and the regular reversal of the direction of its contractions, the Z’unicata stand alone. The general presence of a test solidified by cellulose is a marked peculiarity, but in esti- mating its apparent singularity the existence of cellulose as a constituent of chitin must be remembered. Finally, the tadpole-like larvee of many Ascidians are comparable only to the Cercariw of Trematodes, on the one hand, and to ver- tebrate larval forms on the other. Yet another apparently very distinct type is met with in the extensive group of the Achinodermata. In all the other Metazoa, except the Porifera and Ccelen- terata, the plan of the body is, obviously, bilaterally sym- metrical, the halves of the body on each side of a median ver- tical plane being similar. Any disturbance of this symmetry, such as is found in some Arthropoda and in many Mollusca, arises from the predominant development of one half. But, in a Sea-urchin or Starfish, five or more similar sets of parts are disposed around a longitudinal axis, which has the mouth at one end and the anus at the other; there is a radial sym- metry, as in a sea-anemone or a Ctenophoran. Nevertheless, close observation shows that, as is also the case in the Actinia or Ctenophoran, this radial symmetry is never perfect, and that the body is really bilaterally symmetrical in relation to a median plane which traverses the centre of length of one of the radiating metameres. Another marked peculiarity of the Echinoderm type is 54 . THE ANATOMY OF INVERTEBRATED ANIMALS. the general, if not universal, presence of a system of “am- bulacral vessels” consisting of a circular canal around the mouth, whence canals usually arise and follow the middle line of each of the ambulacral metameres. And, in the typical Echinoderm, these canals give off prolongations which enter certain diverticula of the body-wall, the pedicels or suckers. All Echinoderms have a calcareous endoskeleton. In the chapter allotted to these animals, it will be shown that they are modifications of the’Turbellarian type, brought about by a singular series of changes undergone by the endo- derm and mesoderm of the larva or Echinopedium. Ill. —THE PHYSIOLOGICAL DIFFERENTIATION OF ANIMALS, AND THE MORPHOLOGICAL DIFFERENTIATION OF THEIR ORGANS. Regarded as machines for doing certain kinds of work, animals differ from one another in the extent to which this work is subdivided. Each subordinate group of actions or Junctions is allotted to a particular portion of the body, which thus becomes the organ of those functions ; and the extent to which this division of physiological labor is carried differs in degree within the limits of each common plan, and is the chief cause of the diversity in the working out of the common plan of a group exhibited by its members. Moreover, there are certain types which never attain the same degree of physi- ~ ological differentiation as others do. Thus, some of the Protozoa attain a grade of physiological complexity as high as that which is reached by the lower Me- tazoa. And, notwithstanding the multiplicity of its parts, no Kchinoderm is so highly differentiated a physiological ma- chine as is a snail. A mill with ten pairs of millstones need not be a more complicated machine than a mill with one pair; but if a mill have two pairs of millstones, one for coarse and one for fine grinding, so arranged that the substance ground passes from one to the other, then it is a more complicated machine—a machine of higher order—than that with ten pairs of similar grindstones. In other words, it is not mere multiplication of organs which constitutes physiological differentiation ; but the multiplication of organs for different functions in the first place, and the degree in which they are codrdinated, so as to work to a common end, in the second place. Thus, a lobster is a higher animal, from a physiological point of view, than a THE TEGUMENTARY SYSTEM. 5d Cyclops, not because it has more distinguishable organs, but because these organs are so modified as to perform a much greater variety of functions, while they are all codrdinated toward the maintenance of the animal, by its well-developed nervous system and sense-organs. But it is impossible to say that, e. g., the Arthropoda, as a whole, are physiologically higher than the Mollusca, inasmuch as the simplest embodi- ments of the common plan of the Arthropoda are less differ- entiated physiologically than the great majority of Mollusks. I may now rapidly indicate the mode in which physiologi- cal differentiation is effected in the different groups of organs of the body among the Metazoa. Integumentary Organs.—In the lowest Wetazoa, the integ- ument and the ectoderm are identical, but, so soon as a mes- oderm is developed, the layer of the mesoderm which is in contact with the octoderm becomes virtually part of the in- tegument, and in all the higher animals is distinguished as the dermis (enderon), while the ectodermal cells constitute the epidermis (ecderon). ‘The connective tissue and muscles of the integument are exclusively developed in the enderon ; while, from the epidermis, all cuticular and cellular exoskele- tal parts, and all the integumentary glands, are developed. The latter are always involutions of the epidermis. The hard protective skeletons in all invertebrate Metazoa, except the Porifera, the Actinozoa, the Echinodermata, and the TZuni- cata, are cuticular structures, which may be variously impreg- nated with calcareous salts formed on the outer surface of the epidermic cells. In the Porifera, the calcareous or silicious deposit takes place within the ectoderm itself, and probably the same pro- cess occurs, to a greater or less extent, in the Actinozoa. In those Tunicata which possess a test, it appears to be a struct- ure sut.generis, consisting of a gelatinous basis excreted by the ectoderm, in which cells detached from the ectoderm divide, multiply, and give rise to a deposit of cellulose. The test may take on the structure of cartilage or even of connec- tive tissue. In the Vertebrata alone do we find hard exo- skeletal parts formed by the cornification and cohesion of epi- dermic cells. , In the Actinozoa and the Echinodermata, the hard skele- ton is, in the main, though perhaps not wholly, the result of calcification of elements of the mesoderm. In some Mollusks portions of the mesoderm are converted into true cartilage, 56 THE ANATOMY OF INVERTEBRATED ANIMALS. while the enderon of the integument often becomes the seat of calcareous deposit. The endoskeleton and the dermal exo- skeleton of the Vertebrata are cellular (cartilage, notochord) or fibrous (connective tissue) modifications of the mesoderm, which may become calcified (bone, dentine). Recent invyesti- gations tend to show that the enamel of the teeth is derived from the ectoderm. The Alimentary Apparatus.—From the simple sac of the Hydra or aproctous Turbellarian, we pass to the tubular ali- mentary tract of the proctuchous Zurbellaria. In the Roti- Sera and Polyzoa there is a marked distinction into buccal cavity, pharynx, cesophagus, stomach, and intestines ; while distinct salivary, hepatic, and renal glands, are found in the majority of the higher invertebrates, and, not unfrequently, glands secreting an odorous or colored fluid appear in the region of the termination of the alimentary canal. The oral and gastric regions are armed with cuticular teeth in many Jnvertebrata ; but teeth formed by the calcifi- cation of papillary elevations of the enderon of the lining of the mouth are confined to the Vertebrata ; unless, as seems probable, the teeth of the Kchinidea have a similar origin. The lining membrane of the oral cavity is capable of being everted, as a proboscis, in many Jnvertebrata. The margins of the mouth may be raised into folds, armed with cuticular plates. In the Vertebrata, the jawsare such folds, supported by endoskeletal cartilages, belonging to the system of the visceral arches, or by bones developed in and around them ; but, in the Arthropoda, what are usually termed Jaws are modified limbs. The Blood and Circulatory Apparatus.—In the Ceelen- terata, the somatic cavity, or enteroccele, is in free commu- nication with the digestive cavity, and not unfrequently communicates with the exterior by other apertures. The fluid which it contains represents blood ; it is moved by the con- tractions of the body, and generally by cilia developed on the endodermal lining of the enteroccele. In the Turbellaria, Trematoda, and Cestoidea, the lacunz of the mesoderm and the interstitial fluid of its tissues are the only representatives of a blood-vascular system. It is probable that these com- municate directly with the terminal ramifications of the water- vascular system. In the Fotifera, a spacious perivisceral cavity separates the mesoderm into two layers, the splanch- THE BLOOD-SYSTEM. 54 nopleure, which forms the enderon of the alimentary canal, and the somatopleure, which constitutes the enderon of the integument. ‘The terminations of the water-vessels open into this cavity. In Annelids, there is a similar perivisceral cavity communicating in the same way with the segmental organs ; but, in most, there is, in addition, a system of canals with contractile walls, which, in some, communicate freely with the perivisceral cavity, but, in the majority, are shut off from it. These canals are filled by a clear, usually non-corpuscu- lated fluid, which may be red or green, and constitute the pseud-hemal system. The fluid which occupies the perivis- ceral cavity contains nucleated corpuscles, and has the characters of ordinary blood. It seems probable that the fluid of the pseud-hzemal vessels, as it contains a substance resembling hemoglobin, represents a sort of respiratory blood. In the Arthropoda, no segmental organs or pseud-hemal vessels are known. In the lowest forms, the perivisceral cavity and the interstices of the tissues represent the whole blood-system, and colorless blood-cells float in their fluid con- tents. In the higher forms, a valvular heart, with arteries and capillaries, appears, but the venous system remains more or less lacunar. In the Mollusca, the same gradual differen- tiation of the blood-vascular system is observable. In very many, if not all, the blood-cavities communicate directly with the exterior by the “organs of Bojanus ”—which resemble very simple segmental organs, and appear to be always asso- ciated with the renal apparatus. Inthe Vertebrata, Amphioxus has a system of blood-ves- sels, with contractile walls, and no distinct heart. In all the other Vertebrates there is a heart with at fewest three chambers (sinus venosus, atrium, ventricle), arteries, capil- laries, and veins, and a system of lymphatic vessels connected with the veins. The lymphatic fluid consists of a colorless plasma, with equally colorless nucleated corpuscles ; the blood- plasma contains, in addition, red corpuscles, which are nucle- ated in Ichthyopsida and Sauropsida, but have no nucleus in the Mammalia. The lymphatic vessels always communi- cate with the interstitial lacune of the tissues, and in the lower Vertebrates are themselves, to a great extent, irregular sinuses. The venous system presents many large sinuses in the lower Vertebrates; while, in the higher forms, these sinuses are for the most part replaced by definite vessels with muscular walls. But the “serous cavities” remain as vast 58 THE ANATOMY OF INVERTEBRATED ANIMALS. lymphatic lacunz. Valves make their appearance in the lym- phatics and in the veins, and the heart becomes subdivided in such a manner as to bring about a more and more complete separation of the systemic circulatory apparatus from that which supplies the respiratory organs, The Respiratory System.—In the lower Metazoa respira- tion is effected by the general surface of the body. In the Annelids, processes of the integument, which are sometimes branched and usually are abundantly ciliated and supplied with pseud-hzemal vessels, give rise to branchie. Branchie abundantly supplied with blood-vessels, but never ciliated, attain a great development in the Crustacea. The access of fresh water to them is secured by their attachment to some of the limbs ; and, in the higher Crustaceans, one of the ap- pendages, the second maxilla, serves as an accessory organ of respiration. Although especially adapted for aquatic res- piration, they are converted into air-breathing organs in the land-crabs, being protected and kept moist in a large cham- ber formed by the carapace. In some mollusks (e. g., Pteropoda), the delicate lining membrane of the pallial cavity serves as the respiratory organ; but, in most, branched or laminated processes of the body give rise to distinct branchiz. The mantle becomes an accessory organ of respiration, being so modified as to direct, or to cause, the flow of currents of water over the branchiz contained in its cavity. In many adult urodele Amphibia (Perennibranchiata), and in the embryonic condition of all Amphibia and of many fishes, branchize of a similar character, abundantly supplied with blood-vessels, are attached to more or fewer of the visceral arches. In all these cases the branchiz are external, and are de- veloped from the integument. In Crustaceans and Mollusks the blood with which they are supplied is returning to the heart; while, in the Vertebrata mentioned, it is flowing from the heart; and it will be observed that the gradual per- fectioning of the respiratory machinery consists, first, in the outgrowth of parts of the integument specially adapted to subserve the interchange between the gases contained in the blood and those in the surrounding medium; secondly, in the increase of the surface of the branchix, so as to enable them to do their work more rapidly; thirdly, in the development of accessory organs, by which the flow of water over the branchie is rendered definite and constant, and may be in- THE RESPIRATORY SYSTEM. 59 creased or diminished in accordance with the needs of the economy. It is probable that the water-vascular system and the seg- mental organs of Turbellarians and Annelids, the cloacal tubes of the Gephyrea and of some Holothuridea, the ambu- lacral vesicles of the Echinoderms, and the large pharyngeal cavity of the Polyzoa, to a greater or less extent, subserve respiration, and constitute internal respiratory organs. In Myriapoda and Insecta, the trachee—tubes which open on the surface of the body and contain air, and are curiously similar in their distribution to the water-vessels of the worms—constitute a very complete internal aérial respira- tory apparatus. In Arachnida, tracheze may exist alone, or be accom- panied by folded pulmonary sacs, or the latter may exist alone, as in the Scorpion. In this case, these lungs are sup- plied by blood which is returning from the heart. In these animals, the flow of air into and out of the air- cavities is governed by the contractions of muscles of the body, disposed so as to alter its vertical and longitudinal dimensions. In the higher forms, the entrance and exit of air is regulated by valves, placed at the external openings (stigmata) of the trachez, and provided with muscles, by which they can be shut. In the Enteropneusta and the Tunicata a new form of internal aquatic respiratory apparatus appears. The large pharynx is perforated by lateral apertures, which place its cavity in communication with the exterior; and water, taken in by the mouth, is driven through these branchial clefts and aérates the blood which circulates in their interspaces. The respiratory apparatus of Amphioxus, of all adult fishes, and of the tadpoles of the higher anurous Amphibia, in a certain stage of their existence, is of an essentially simi- lar character. The accessory respiratory apparatus for the maintenance and the regulation of the currents of water over - the gills is furnished by the visceral arches and their mus- cles; and the respiratory blood flows from the heart. In Mollusks which live on land (Pulmogasteropoda), the lining wall of the mantle cavity becomes folded and highly vascular, and subserves the aération of the venous blood, which flows through it on its way to the heart. The lung is here a modification of the integument, and might be termed an external lung. The lungs of the air-breathing Vertebrata, on the contrary, are diverticula of the alimentary canal, pos- 60 THE ANATOMY OF INVERTEBRATED ANIMALS. terior to the hindermost of the visceral arches. They receive their blood from the hindermost aortic arch. It therefore flows from the heart. The gradual improvement of these lungs as respiratory machines is effected, first, by the increase of the surface over which the venous blood brought to the lungs is distributed; secondly, by changes in the walls of the cavity in which the lungs are contained, by which that cavity gradually becomes shut off from the peritoneal cham- ber, and divided from it by a muscular partition. Concur- rently with these modifications, a series of alterations takes place in the accessory apparatus of respiration, whereby the machinery of inspiration, which, in the lower Vertebrata, is a buccal force-pump, which drives air into the lungs, in the same way as water is driven through the branchiz, is replaced by a thoracic suction-pump, which draws air into the lungs by dilatation of the walls of the closed cavity in which they are contained. Along with these changes, modifications of the heart take place, in virtue of which one-half of its total mechanical power becomes more and more exclusively ap- propriated to the task of driving the blood through the lungs. The term “double circulation” applied to the course of the blood in the highest Vertebrata is, however, a misnomer. In the highest, as in the lowest, of these animals, the blood com- pletes but one circle, and the respiratory organ is in the course of the outward current. Many animals are truly amphibious, combining aquatic and aérial respiratory organs. Thus, among Mollusks, Ampullaria and Onchidum com- bine branchiee with pulmonary organs ; many Teleostean fishes have the lining membrane of the enlarged branchial chamber vascular and competent to subserve aérial respiration. And in the Ganoids and Teleostei the presence of an air-bladder, which is both functionally and morphologically of the same nature asa lung, is very common. But, in the majority of the Teleostei, the air-bladder is turned aside from its pulmo- nary function to subserve mechanical purposes, in affecting the specific gravity of the body. On the other hand, in the Ganoids and Dipnoi, the whole series of modifications by which the air-bladder passes into the lung are patent. In such lower Amphibia as Proteus and Menobranchus, bran- chial respiration is predominant, and the lungs are subsidi- ary; but, in the higher, the lungs acquire greater importance, while the branchize diminish, and eventually disappear. THE UROPOIETIC SYSTEM. 61 The Uropoietic System.—Uropoietic organs, distinct from the alimentary canal, are probably represented by the water- vascular system and segmental organs of the worms. The “organs of Bojanus” of Mollusks are sacs or tubes opening, on the one side, on the exterior of the body, and, on the other, into some part of the blood-vascular system. So far, as Gegenbaur has shown, they resemble the segmental organs of Annelids. In the majority of the Mollusca, some part of the wall of the organ of Bojanus is in close relation with the venous system near the heart, and the nitrogenous waste of the body is here eliminated from the venous blood. In the Vertebrata, the renal apparatus is constructed on the same principle. If for simplicity’s sake we reduce a mammalian kidney to a ureter with a single uriniferous tubule, it cor- responds with an organ of Bojanus, so far as it contains a cavity communicating with the exterior at one end, and hav- ing a vascular plexus—the Malpighian body—in intimate contact with the opposite end. In the adult mammal there is no direct communication between the urinary duct and the blood-vascular system. But, inasmuch as recent researches have proved that the ureter is formed by subdivision of the Wolffian duct, and that the Wolffian duct is primitively a di- verticulum of the peritoneal cavity, and remains for a longer or shorter time (permanently, in some of the lower Verte- brata, as Myxine) in communication therewith ; and since it has further been shown that the peritoneal cavity communi- cates directly with the lymphatics, and therefore indirectly with the veins; it follows that the vertebrate kidney is an extreme modification of an organ, the primitive type of which is to be found in the organ of Bojanus of the Mollusk, and in the segmental organ of the Annelid ; and, to go still lower, in the water-vascular system of the Turbellarian. And this, in its lowest form, is so similar to the more complex conditions of the contractile vacuole of a Protozoén, that it is hardly straining analogy too far to regard the latter as the primary form of uropoietic as well as of internal respiratory apparatus. The Nervous System.—In its essential nature, a nerve is a definite tract of living substance, through which the molec- ular changes which occur in any one part of the organism are conveyed to and affect some other part. Thus, if, in the simple protoplasmic body of a Protozoén, a stimulus applied to one part of the body were more readily transmitted to some other part, along a particular tract of the protoplasm, 62 THE ANATOMY OF INVERTEBRATED ANIMALS. that tract would be a virtual nerve, although it might have no optical or chemical characters which should enable us to distinguish it from the rest of the protoplasm. It is important to have this definition of nerve clearly before us in considering the question whether the lowest animals possess nerves or not. Assuredly nothing of the kind is discernible, by such means of investigation as we at present possess, in Protozoa or Porifera ; but any one who has attentively watched the ways of a Colpoda, or still more of a Vorticella, will probably hesitate to deny that they possess some apparatus by which external agencies give rise to localized and codrdinated movements. And when we reflect that the essential elements of the highest nervous system—the fibrils into which the axis-fibres break up—are filaments of the extremest tenuity, devoid of any definite structural or other characters, and that the nervous system of animals only becomes conspicuous by the gathering to- gether of these filaments into nerve-fibres and nerves, it will be obvious that there are as strong morphological, as there are physiological, grounds for suspecting that a nervous sys- tem may exist very low down in the animal scale, and possi- bly even in plants. The researches of Kleinenberg, which may be readily veri- fied, have shown that, in the common Hydra, the inner ends of the cells of the ectoderm are prolonged into delicate pro- cesses, which are eventually continued into very fine longi- tudinal filaments, forming a layer between the ectoderm and the endoderm. Kleinenberg terms these neuro-muscular elements, and thinks that they represent both nerve and muscle in their undifferentiated state. But it appears to me that while the assumed contractility of these fibres might account for the shortening of the body of the Polyp, they can have nothing to do with its lengthening. As the latter movements are at least as vigorous as the former, we are therefore obliged to assume sufficient contractility in the general constituents of the body to account for them. And if so, what ground is there for supposing that this contractility can be exerted by only one tissue when the body shortens? To my mind, it is more probable that “ Kleinenberg’s fibres” are solely inter- nuncial in function, and therefore the primary form of nerve. The prolongations of the ectodermal cells have indeed a strangely close resemblance to those of the cells of the olfac- tory and other sense-organs in the Vertebrata ; and it seems THE NERVOUS SYSTEM. 63 probable that they are the channels by which impulses affect- ing any of the cells of the ectoderm are conveyed to other cells and excite their contraction. The researches of Eimer * upon the nervous system of the Ctenophora are in perfect accordance with this view. The mesoderm is traversed in all directions by very fine fibrils, varying in diameter from z5}p5 tO qxhpp Of an inch. These fibrils present numerous minute varicosities, and, at intervals, larger swellings which contain nuclei, each with a large and strongly refracting nucleolus. These fibrils take a straight course, branch dichotomously, and end in still finer filaments, which also divide, but become no smaller. They terminate partly in ganglionic cells, partly in muscular fibres, partly in the cells of the ectoderm and endoderm. Many of the nerve- fibrils take a longitudinal course beneath the centre of each series of paddles, and these are accompanied by ganglionic cells, which become particularly abundant toward the aboral end of each series. The eight bands meet in a central tract at the aboral pole of the body; but Himer doubts the nervous nature of the cellular mass which lies beneath the lithocyst and supports the eye-spots. The nervous system of the Ctenophoran is, therefore, just such as would arise in Hydra, if the development of a thick mesoderm gave rise to the separation and elongation of Kleinenberg’s fibres, and if special bands of such fibres, developed in relation with the chief organs of locomotion, united in a central tract directly connected with the higher sensory organs. We have here, in short, virtual, though in- completely differentiated, brain and nerves. All recent investigation tends more and more completely to establish the following conclusions: firstly, that the central ganglia of the nervous system in all animals are derived fron» the ectoderm; secondly, that all the nerves of the sensory organs terminate in cells of the ectoderm; thirdly, that all motor nerves end in the substance of the muscular fibres to which they are distributed. So that, in the highest animals, the nervous system is essentially similar to that of the lowest; the difference consisting, in part, in the proportional size of the nerve-centres, and, in part, in the gathering together of the internuncial filaments into bundles, having a definite arrangement, which are the nerves, in the ordinary anatomical sense of the term. 1 ** Zoologische Studien auf Capri.’”’? Leipsic, 1873. 64 THE ANATOMY OF INVERTEBRATED ANIMALS. And as respects the ectodermal cells which constitute the fundamental part of the organs of the special senses, it is becoming clear that the more perfect the sensory apparatus, the more completely do these sensigenous cells take on the form of delicate rods or filaments. Whether we consider the organs of the lateral Jine in fishes and amphibia, the gusta- tory bulbs, the olfactory cells, the auditory cells, or the elements of the retina, this rule holds good. Every one of the organs of the higher senses makes its appearance in the animal series as a part of the ectoderm, the cells of which have undergone a slight modification. In the case of the eye, accessory structures, consisting of vari- ously-colored masses of pigment, which surround the visual cells, and of a transparent refracting cuticular or cellular structure which les superficially to them—a rudimentary choroid and cornea—are next added. The highest form of compound Arthropod eye differs from this only in the differ- entiation of the layer of sensigenous cells into the crystalline cones and their appendages, and it has not been clearly made out that the simple eyes of most other Jnvertebrata have undergone any further change. But in Vautilus the nerve-cells and choroid line the walls of a deep cup open externally ; which, though its development has not been traced, may be safely assumed to result from the involution of the retinal ectoderm. It may be compared to an arthropod compound eye become concave instead of convex. In the higher Cephalopoda, the margins of the ocular pouch unite and give rise to a true cornea, which, however, frequently remains perforated, and a crystalline lens is de- veloped. Inthe higher Vertebrata the retina is still a modi- fied portion of the ectoderm. For, inasmuch as the anterior cerebral vesicle is formed by involution of the epiblast, and the optic vesicle is a diverticulum of the anterior cerebral vesicle, it necessarily follows that the outer wall of the optic vesicle is really part of the ectoderm, its inner face being, morpholegically, a portion of the surface of the body. The rods and cones of the vertebrate eye, therefore, exactly corre- spond with the crystalline cones, etc., of the Arthropod eye; and the reversal of the ends which are turned toward the light in the Vertebrata is a necessary result of the extraor- dinary change of position which the retinal surface undergoes in them. In the part of the ectoderm which takes on the auditory REPRODUCTIVE ORGANS. 65 function, two kinds of accessory organs, solid particles sus- pended ina fluid and fine hair-like filaments, are developed in close relation with the nerve-endings. In the Crustacea both are combined, and an ‘involution of the sensory region takes place, which usually remains open throughout life, and represents the most rudimentary form of auditory labyrinth. The Crustacean ear is the parallel of the Nautilus eye. In the Vertebrata the membranous labyrinth is similarly an in- volution of the integument, which remains open throughout life in many fishes, but becomes shut off and surrounded by thick mesoblastic structures in all the higher Vertebrata. The tympanum and the ossicula auditis are additional accessory structures, formed at the expense of the hyoman- dibular cleft and its boundary-walls. The Reproductive System.—The relation of the reproduc- tive elements to the primitive layers of the germ is as yet uncertain. E. van Beneden has brought forward very strong evidence to the effect that in-Hydractinia the spermatozoa are modified cells of the ectoderm, and the ova of those of the endoderm; but, whether it can be safely concluded that this rule holds good for animals generally, is a question that can only be settled by much and difficult investigation. The fact that, in the Vertebrata, the ova and spermatozoa are products of the epithelial lining of the peritoneal cavity, and therefore proceed from the mesoblast, appears at first sight directly to negative any such generalization. But it must be remem- bered that the origin of the mesoblast itself is yet uncertain, and that it is quite possible that one portion of that layer may originate in the ectoderm and another in the endoderm. There is some reason to suspect that hermaphrodism was the primitive condition of the sexual apparatus, and that uni- sexuality is the result of the abortion of the organs of the other sex, in males and females respectively. Very low down in the animal series, among the Zurbella- ria, the accessory organs of generation acquire a great com- plexity. In the lower Turbellaria the excretory duct is a mere short, wide passage. But, in the higher 7urbellariaand Trematoda, the female apparatus presents a germarium, in which the ova are developed; vitellarian glands, which give rise to a supplemental or food -yelk ; an oviduct ; a uterus and vagina; and a spermatheca, in which the semen is stored up. The male apparatus presents a testis, a vas deferens, and a penis. The function of the vitellarian gland may be taken on 66 THE ANATOMY OF INVERTEBRATED ANIMALS. by cells of the ovary, or oviduct; or accessory yelk-substance may be formed within the primitive ovum itself, in the Arthro- poda and in most Mollusca ; but the reproductive organs in all these animals are reducible to the Turbellarian type. In the Annelids ( Oligocheta and Polycheta), the ovaria and testes often have no special ducts, and their products make their way out of the body by canals which appear to be modified segmental organs. In the Cephalopoda, again, the ovaria and testes part with their contents by dehiscence into chambers connected with the water-cavities, which are prolongations of the organs of Boja- nus. And they are conveyed away from these chambers by ducts, the oviducts or vasa deferentia, which commence by open mouths in them. In the Vertebrata, the reproductive organs either dehisce and pour their contents into the peritoneal cavity, whence they are conveyed outward by abdominal pores (arsipo- branchii, many Teleostei), or they are continued into ducts which open behind the anus separately from the renal open- ing in the females, but in common with it in the males (most Teleosteans) ; or their ducts are derived from portions of the primitive renal apparatus which, as we have seen, is a struct- ure of the same order as the organs of Bojanus and the seg- mental organs. The testis is usually converted into a mass of tubuli, which eventually open directly into the ducts (epi- didymis, vas deferens) derived from the renal organs. The ovary, on the other hand, becomes an aggregation of sacs— the Graafian follicles—and the oviducts open into the perito- neal cavity. Development.—The embryo either passes through all stages from the morula to a condition differing from the adult only in size, proportions, and sexual characters, or it leaves the egg in a condition more or less remote from the adult state, and sometimes exceedingly different from it. In the latter case, the animal is said to undergo a metamorphosis. Each of these modes of development occurs in members of the same group, and often in closely allied forms : as, for example, the former in the crayfish (Astacus), and the latter in the lobster (Homarus). When metamorphosis occurs, the larva may live under conditions totally different from those under which the adult passes its existence, and its structure may be variously modi- fied in relation to these conditions. Thus the larva of an DEVELOPMENT. BY animal which is fixed in the adult state may be provided with largely-developed locomotive organs; while that of an adult which feeds by suction may be provided with powerful appa- ratus for the seizure and manducation of vegetable and ani- mal prey. The larva of a free adult may be parasitic, or that of a parasitic adult free and actively locomotive. Moreover, the whole course of development may take place outside the body of the parent, or more or less extensively within it ; whence the distinction of oviparous, ovoviviparous, and viviparous" animals. _ Finally, when development takes place within the body of the parent, the foetus may receive nourishment from the latter by means of an apparatus termed a placenta, by which an exchange between the parental and foetal blood is readily effected. Examples of placentez are found not only in the higher mammals, but in some Plagiostome fishes and among the Zunicata. In many insects and in the higher Vertebrates, the em- bryo acquires a special protective envelope, the amnion, which is thrown off at birth ; while, in many Vertebrates, another foetal appendage, the allantois, subserves the respi- ration and nutrition of the foetus. The strange phenomena included under the head of the ** Alternation of Generations,” and which result from the di- vision, by budding or otherwise, of the embryo which leaves the egg, into a succession of independent zodids, only the last of which acquires sexual organs, have already been gener- ally discussed. IV.—THE DISTRIBUTION OF ANIMALS. The distribution of animals has to be considered under two points of view: first, in respect of the present condi- tion of Nature ; and secondly, in respect of past conditions. The first is commonly termed Geographical, the second Geological, or Paleontological, Distribution. th of an _inch in diameter make their appearance. The cells of which these outgrowths are composed next become differentiated into two layers—an external clear and transparent layer, which is in contact with the cone, and invests the sides of the elevation ; and an inner darker mass. The external layer is the ectoderm of the young medusoid, the inner its endoderm. A cavity, which is the commencement of the gastric cavity, ap- pears in the endodermal mass, and opens outward on the free side of the bud. The latter, now 34,th of an inch in diameter, has assumed the form of a plano-convex disk, fixed by its flat side to the cone, and having the oral aperture in the centre of its convex free side. The disk next increasing in height, the 1 I have seen no reason to depart from the opinions on the subject of ‘ Animal individuality’ enunciated in my lecture published in the Annals and Magazine of Natural History for June, 1852. 2 Beitrage zur Naturgeschichte der Hydromedusen,” 1865. 136 THE ANATOMY OF INVERTEBRATED ANIMALS. body acquires the form of a flask with a wide neck. The belly of the flask is the commencement of the umbrella of the bud- ding medusoid; the neck is its gastric division. The belly of the flask, in fact, continues to widen out until it has the form of a flat cup, from the centre of which the relatively small gastric neck projects, and the bud is converted into an unmis- takable medusoid, attached to the cone by the centre of the aboral face of its umbrella. In the mean while, the gelatinous transparent mesoderm has appeared, and, in the umbrella, has acquired a great relative thickness. Into this, eight prolonga- tions of the gastric cavity extend, and give rise to the radial canals, which become united into a circular canal at the cir- cumference of the disk. The velum, tentacula, and lithocysts are developed, and the bud becomes detached as a free swim- ming medusoid. But this medusoid is very different from the Carmarina from which .it has budded. Tor example, it has eight radial canals, while the Carmarina has only six; it has solid tentacles, while the adult Carmarina has tubular tenta- cles; it has no gastric cone, and has differently disposed lith- ocysts. Haeckel, in fact, identifies it with Cunina rhodo- dactyla, a form which had hitherto been considered to be not only specifically and generically different from Carmarina, but to be amember of a distinct family—that of the Zginide. What makes this process of asexual multiplication more remarkable is, that it takes place in Carmarine which have already attained sexual maturity, and in males as well as in females. There is reason to believe that a similar process of ento- gastric proliferation occurs in several other species of _dgi- nide—Avgineta prolifera (Gegenbaur), Hurystoma rubigi- nosum (Kolliker), and Cunina Kollikeri (F. Miiller); but, in all these cases, the medusoids which result from the gem- mative process closely resemble the stock from which they are produced. As might be expected, the Hydrozoa are extremely rare in the fossil state, and probably the last animal the discovery of fossil remains of which could be anticipated is a jelly- -fish. Nevertheless, some impressions of Medusze, in the Solenhofen slates, are sufficiently well preserved to allow of their deter- mination as members of the group of Lhizostomide.’ The 1 Haeckel, ‘‘ Ueber zwei neue fossile Medusen aus der Familie der Rhi- zostomiden.”’ (‘‘ Jahrbuch fur Mineralogie,” 1866.) THE ACTINOZOA. 137 apparent absence of the remains of Hydrophora in the meso- zoic and newer palzeozoic rocks is very remarkable. Some singular organisms, termed Graptolites, which abound in the Silurian rocks, may possibly be Hydrozoa, though they present points of resemblance with the Polyzoa. They are simple or branched stems, sometimes slender, sometimes ex- panded or foliaceous ; occasionally the branches are connected at their origin by a membranous expansion. The stems are tubular, and beset on one or both sides with minute cup- shaped prolongations, like the thecz of a Sertularian. A solid thickening of the skeleton may have the appearance of an independent axis. Allman has suggested that the theciform projections of the Graptolite stem may correspond with the mematophores of Sertularians, and that the branches may have been terminated by hydranths. Appendages which ap- pear to be analogous to the gonophores of the Hydrophora have been described in some Graptolites.’ With a very few exceptions (Hydra, Cordylophora) the Hydrozoa are marine animals; and a considerable number, like the Calycophoride and Physophoride, are entirely pe- lagic in their habits. Tar Actinozoa.—The essential distinctions between the Actinozoa and the Hydrozoa are two. In the first place, the oral aperture of an Actinozoén leads into a sac, which, with- out prejudice to the question of its exact function, may be termed “ gastric,” and which is not, like the hydranth of the Hydrozoin, free and projecting, but is sunk within the body. From the walls of the latter it is separated by a cavity, the sides of which are divided by partitions, the mesenteries, which radiate from the wall of the gastric sac to that of the body, and divide the somatic cavity into a corresponding num- ber of tntermesenteric chambers. As the gastric sac is open at its inner end, however, its cavity is in free communication with that of the central space which communicates with the intermesenteric chambers ; and the central space, together with the chambers, which are often collectively termed the “body cavity” or ‘ perivisceral cavity,” are, in reality, one with the digestive cavity, and, as in the Hydrozoa, consti- stute an enterocele. Thus an Actinozodn might be com- pared to a Lucernaria, or still better to a Carduella, in which the outer face of the hydranth is united with the inner face 1 Hall, “* Graptolites of the Quebec Series of North America,” 1865. Nichol- son, ‘‘ Monograph of the British Graptolitidx,.’”’ 1872. 133 THE ANATOMY OF INVERTEBRATED ANIMALS. of the umbrella ; under these circumstances the canals of the umbrella in the Hydrozojn would answer to the intermesen- teric chambers in the ActinozoGn. Secondly, in the Actinozoa, the reproductive elements are developed in the walls of the chambers or canals of the en- teroccele, just as they so commonly are in the walls of the gastro-vascular canals of the Hydrozoa, but the generative organs thus constituted do not project outwardly, nor dis- charge their contents directly outward. On the contrary, the ova and spermatozoa are shed into the enteroccele, and event- ually make their way out by the mouth. In this respect, again, the Actinozojn is comparable to a Lucernaria modi- fied by the union of the hydranth with the ventral face of the umbrella ; under which circumstances the reproductive ele- ments, which in all Hydrozoa are developed, either in the walls of the hydranth or in those of the oral face of the um- brella, would be precluded from making their exit by any other route than through the gastro-vascular canals and the mouth. In the fundamental composition of the body of an ecto- derm and endoderm, with a more or less largely developed mesoderm, and in the abundance of thread-cells, the Actino- zoa agree with the Hydrozoa. In most of the Actinozoa, the simple polyp, into which the embryo is converted, gives rise by budding to many zodids which form a coherent whole, termed by Lacaze-Du- thiers a zoanthodeme. Tae Coratticena.— The Actinozoa comprehend two groups—the Coralligena and the Ctenophora—which are widely different in appearance though fundamentally similar in structure. In the former, the mouth is always surrounded by one or more circlets of tentacles, which may be slender and conical, or short, broad, and fimbriated. The mouth is usually elongated in one direction, and, at the extremities of the long diameter, presents folds which are continued into the gastric cavity. The arrangement of the parts of the body is therefore not so completely radiate as it appears to be. The enteroccele is divided into six, eight, or more wide inter- mesenteric chambers, which communicate with the cavities of the tentacles, and sometimes directly with the exterior, by apertures in the parietes of the body. The mesenteries which separate these wide chambers are thinand membranous. Two of them, at opposite ends of a transverse diameter of the Ac- THE CORALLIGENA. 139 tinozodn, are often different from the rest. Each mesentery ends, at its aboral extremity, in a free edge, often provided ’ Fra. 29.—Perpendicular section of Actinia holsatica (after Frey and Leuckart).—a, mouth; 0, gastric cavity; c, common cavity, into which the gastric cavity and the intermesenteric chambers open; d@, intermesenteric chambers; ¢, thickened free margin, containing thread-cells of, 7, a mesentery; g, reproductive organ ; h, tentacle. with a thickened and folded margin ; and these free edges look toward the centre of an axial cavity,’ into which the gas- tric sac and all the intermesenteric chambers open. In the Coralligena, the outer wall of the body is not pro- vided with bands of large paddle-like cilia. Most of them are fixed temporarily or permanently, and many give rise by gemmation to turf-like, or arborescent, zoanthodemes. The great majority possess a hard skeleton, composed principally of carbonate of lime, which may be deposited in permanently disconnected spicula in the walls of the body; or the spicula may run into one another, and form solid networks, or dense plates, of calcareous matter. When the latter is the case, the calcareous deposit may invade the base and lateral walls of the body of the Actinozoén, thus giving rise to a simple cup, or theca. The skeleton thus formed, freed of its soft parts, is a “ cup-coral,” and receives the name of a corallite. In a zoanthodeme, the various polyps (anthozodids) formed by gemmation may be distinct, or their several enter- ocoeles may communicate; in which last case, the common connecting mass of the body, or cwnosarc, may be traversed by a regular system of canals. And, when such compound 1 Partially-digested substances are often found in this axial space, and it is not improbable that it may functionally represent the stomach or the com- mencement of the intestine in higher animals. 140 THE ANATOMY OF INVERTEBRATED ANIMALS. Actinozoa develop skeletons, the corallites may be distinct, and connected only by a substance formed by the calcifica- tion of the coenosarc, which is termed cenenchyma ; or the thecze may be imperfectly developed, and the septa of adja- cent corallites run into one another. ‘There are cases, again, in which the calcareous deposit in the several polyps of a compound Actinozoon, and in the superficial parts of the coe- nenchyma, remains loose and spicular, while the axial por- tion of the ccenosarcis converted into a dense chitinous cr cal- cified mass—the so-called sclerobase. The mesoderm contains abundantly developed muscular fibres. The question whether the Coralligena possess a ner- vous system and organs of sense, hardly admits of a definite answer at present. It is only in the Actinide that the ex- istence of such organs has been asserted ; and the nervous circlet of Actinia, described by Spix, has been seen by no later investigator, and may be safely assumed to be non-exist- ent. Prof. P. M. Duncan, F. R. 8.,* however, has recently described a nervous apparatus, consisting of fusiform gan- glionic cells, united by nerve-fibres, which resemble the sym- pathetic nerve-fibrils of the Vertebrata, and form a plexus, which appears to extend throughout the pedal disk, and very probably into other parts of the body. In some of the | Actinide (e. g., Actinia mesembryanthemum), brightly-col- ored bead-like bodies are situated in the oral disk cutside the tentacles. The structure of these “chromatophores,” or ‘““bourses calicinales,” has been carefully investigated by Schneider and Rétteken, and by Prof. Duncan. They are diverticula of the body wall, the surface of which is com- posed of close-set “bacilli,” beneath which lies a layer of strongly-refracting spherules, followed by another layer of no less strongly-refracting cones. Subjacent to these, Prof. Duncan finds ganglion cells and nervous plexuses. It would seem, therefore, that these bodies are rudimentary eyes. The sexes are united or distinct, and the ovum is ordina- rily, if not always, provided with a vitelline membrane. The impregnated ovum gives rise to a ciliated morula, which may either be discharged or undergo further development within the somatic cavity of the parent. The morula becomes a gas- trula, but whether by true invagination or by delamination, as in most of the Hydrozoa, is not quite clear. The gastrula usually fixes itself by its closed end, while tentacles are de- 1 ** On the Nervous System of Actinia.”’ (** Proceedings of the Royal Socie- ty,”? October 9, 1873.) THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE CORALLIGENA. 141 veloped from its oral end. It can hardly be doubted that the intermesenteric chambers are diverticula of the primitive ea- terocoele ; but the exact mode of their origin needs further elucidation. Lacaze-Duthiers' has recently thrown a new light upon the development of the Coralligena, and particularly of the Actiniew (Actinia, Sagartia, Bunodes). These animals are generally hermaphrodite, testes and ovaria being usually found in the same animal, and even in the same mesenteries ; but it may happen that the organs of one or the other sex are, at any given time, exclusively developed. The ova undergo the early stages of their development within the body of the parent. The process of yelk division was not observed, and in the earliest condition described the embryo was an oval planula-like body, composed of an inner colored substance and an outer colorless layer. The outer layer (epiblast = ec- toderm) soon becomes ciliated. An oval depression appears at one end, and becomes the mouth’ and gastric sac, while, at the opposite extremity, the cilia elongate into a tuft. The ectoderm extends into and lines the gastric sac, while the in- terior of the colored hypoblast becomes excavated by a cay- ity, the enteroccele, which communicates with the gastric sac. In this condition the embryo swims about with its oral pole directed backward. The oral aperture changes its form and becomes elongated in one direction, which may be termed the oral axis. The mesenteries are paired processes of the transparent outer layer (probably of that part which constitutes the mesoderm) which mark off corresponding segments of the enteroccele. The first which make their appearance are directed nearly at right angles to the oral axis near, but not exactly in, the centre of its length. Hence they divide the enteroccele into two primitive chambers, a smaller (A) at one end of the oral axis, and a larger (A’) at the other. This condition may be represented by A+A’; the dots indicating the position of the primitive mesenteries, and the hyphen that of the oral axis. It is interesting to remark that, in this state, the em- _ ‘Développement des Coralliaires.’? (Archives de Zoologie expérimentale, 2.) 2 Kowalewsky describes the formation of a gastrula by invagination in a spe- cies of Actinia and in Cereanthus, the aperture of invagination becoming the mouth (Hofmann and Schwalbe, ‘‘ Jahresbericht,”’ Bd. II., p. 269). In other species of Actinia and in Alcyonium, the planula seems to delaminate. Ordi- nary yelk division occurs in some Anthozoa, while in others (Aleyonium) the process rather resembles that which occurs in most Arthropods. 142 THE ANATOMY OF INVERTEBRATED ANIMALS. bryo is a bilaterally symmetrical cylindrical body, with a cen- tral canal, the future gastric sac; and, communicating there- with, a bilobed enteroccele, which separates the central canal - from the body-wall. Jn fact, in principle, it resembles the early condition of the embryo of a Ctenophore, a Brachiopod, or a Sagitta. Another pair of mesenteric processes now makes its ap- pearance in the larger chamber A’, and cuts off two lateral chambers, B, B, which le between these secondary mesenteries and the primary ones. In this state the enteroccele or somat- ic cavity is four-chambered Ore A’). Next a third pair of mesenteries appear in the smaller chamber (A), and divide it into three portions, one at the end of the oral axis (A), and two lateral (C,C). In this stage there are therefore six chambers (A mally A’); but almost immediately the number is increased to eight, by the development of a fourth pair of mesenteries in the chambers B, B, which thus give rise to the chambers D, D, between the primitive mesenteries and them- selves. The embryo remains in the eight-chambered condition ( ne CS? NTS Cup 5 dividing mesenteries become equal. Then a fifth and a sixth pair of mesenteries are formed in the chambers C, C, and D, D; two pairs of new chambers, E and F, are produced, and thus the Actinia acquires twelve chambers (A . aoe A ms A’), five A’) for some time, until all the chambers and their of which result from the subdivision of the smaller primary chamber, and seven from that of the larger primary chamber. The various chambers now acquire equal dimensions, and the tentacles begin to bud out from each. The appearance of the tentacles, however, is not simultaneous. That which pro- ceeds from the chamber A’ is earliest to appear, and for some time is largest, and, at first, eight of the tentacles are larger than the other four. The coiled marginal ends of the mesenteries appear at first upon the edges of the two primary mesenteries; then upon the edge of the fourth pair, and afterward upon those of the other pairs. For the further changes of the young Actinia, I must refer to the work cited. Sufficient has been said to show that the development of the Actiniew follows a law of bilateral symmetry, and to bring out the important fact that, in the THE OCTOCORALLA. 143 course of its development, the finally hexamerous Antho- zoon passes through a tetramerous and an octomerous stage. Phenomena analogous to the “ alternation of generations,” which is so common among the /Hydrozoa, are unknown among the great majority of the Actinozoa. But Semper’ has recently described a process of agamogenesis in two spe- cies of Kungice, which he ranks under this head. The /ungie bud out from a branched stem, and then become detached and free, as is the habit of the genus. To make the parallel with the production of a medusoid from a hydroid polyp complete, however, the stem should be nourished by a sexless anthozoéid of a different character from the forms of Lungic which are produced by gemmation. And this does not appear to be the case. In one division of the Coralligena—the Octocoralla— eight enteroccele chambers are developed, and as many ten- tacles. Moreover, these tentacles are relatively broad, flat- tened, and serrated at the edges, or even pinnatifid. The Actinozoén developed from the egg may remain simple (Haimea, Milne-Edwards), but usually gives rise to a zoan- thodeme. The coenosare of the zoanthodeme in the Octocoralla is a substance of fleshy consistence, which is formed chiefly of a peculiar kind of connective tissue, containing many muscular fibres developed in the thickened mesoderm. The axial cavity of each anthozoéid is in communication with a system of large canals. In Aleyoniwm, a single large canal descends from each anthozodid into the interior of the zoanthodeme, and the eight mesenteries are continued as so many ridges throughout its entire length,” so that these tubes have been compared to the thecal canals of the Millepores. In the red coral of commerce (Corallium rubrum, Fig. 30), the large canals run parallel with the axial skeleton. A delicate net- work, which traverses the rest of the substance of the coeno- sarc, appears to be sometimes solid and sometimes to form a system of fine canals opening into the larger ones, The anthozodids possess numerous muscles by which their move- ments are effected. The fibres are delicate, pale, and not striated. Nerves have not been certainly made out. It is in these Octocoralla that the form of skeleton which is termed a sclerobase, which is formed by cornification or 1“ Veber Generations-Wechsel bei Steinkorallen.”? Leipsic, 1872. 2 Pouchet and Myévre, ‘Contribution 4 Anatomie des Alcyonaires.” (Journal d’ Anatomie et de la Physiologie, 1870.) 144 THE ANATOMY OF INVERTEBRATED ANIMALS. Fic. 30.—Corallium rubrum (after Lacaze-Duthiers 1). I. The end of a branch with A, B, C, three anthozodids in different degrees of ex- pansion; k, the mouth; a, that part of the ccenosare which rises into a cup around the base of each anthozo6id. II. Portion of a branch, the ccenosare of which has been Givided longitudinally and partially removed; B, B’, B’’, anthozodids in section; B, anthozodid with ex- panded tentacles; %, mouth; m, gastric sac; z, its inferior edge; 7, mesenteries. B’, anthozoéid retracted, with the tentacles (d) drawn back into the intermesenteric chambers; ¢, orifices of the cavities of the invaginated tentacles ; e, circum-oral cavity ; 5, the part of the body which forms the projecting tube when the antho- zooid is expanded : a, festeoned edges of the cup. B”, anthozodid, showing the transverse sections of the mesenteries. A, A, cenosarec, with its deep longitudinal canals (/), and superficial, irregular, reticulated canals (h). P, the hard axis of the coral, with longitudinal grooves (g) answering to the longitudinal vessels. IIl., 1V. Free ciliated embryos. 1 *¢ Histoire Naturelle du Corail,”’ 1864, — ne THE ACTINOZOA. 145 calcification of the axial connective tissue of the zoantho- deme, occurs. It is an unattached simple rod in Pennatula and Veretillum, but fixed, tree-like, branched, and even retic- ulated, in the Gorgonie and the red coral of commerce (Co- rallium). In the Aleyonia, or “ Dead-men’s-fingers,” of our own shores, there is no sclerobase, nor is there any in Tubi- pora, the organ-coral. But, whereas in all the other Octoco- ralla the bodies of the polyps and the ccenosare are beset with loose spicula of carbonate of lime, Tubipora is provided with solid tubiform thece, in which, however, there are no septa. Dimorphism has been observed by Killiker to occur exten- sively among the Pennatulidew. Each zoanthodeme presents at least two different sets of zodids, some being fully devel- oped, and provided with sexual organs, while the others have neither tentacles nor generative organs, and exhibit some other peculiarities.’ These abortive zodids are either scat- tered irregularly among the others (e. g., Sarcophyton, Vere- tillum), or may occupy a definite position (e. ¢., Virgularia). In the other chief division of the Coralligena—the Hexa- coralla—the fundamental number of enteroccele chambers and of tentacles is six,’ and the tentacles are, as a rule, rounded and conical, or filiform. The Actinozoén developed from the ege in some of the Hexacoralla remains simple, and attains a considerable size. Of these—the Actinide—many are to some extent locomo- tive, and some (Minyas) float freely by the help of their contractile pedal region. The most remarkable form of this group is the genus Cereanthus, which has two circlets, each composed of numerous tentacles, one immediately around the oral aperture, the other at the margin of the disk. The foot is elongated, subconical, and generally presents a pore at its apex. Of the diametral folds of the oral aperture, one pair is much longer than the other, and is produced as far as the pedal pore. The larva is curiously like a young hydrozoin with four tentacles, and, at one time, possesses four mesen- teries. The Zoanthide differ from the Actinide in little more than their multiplication by buds, which remain adherent, either by a common connecting expansion or by stolons; and in the possession of a rudimentary, spicular skeleton. In the Antipathide there is a sclerobasic skeleton. The proper a ‘‘ Abhandlungen der Senkenbergischen naturforschenden Gesellschaft,” Agta aie ? That is to say, in the adult, they are either six or some multiple of six. I 146 THE ANATOMY OF INVERTEBRATED ANIMALS. stone-corals are essentially Actiniw, which become converted into zoanthodemes by gemmation or fission, and develop a continuous skeleton. The skeletal parts * of all the Actinozoa, consist either of a substance of a horny character; or of an organic basis im- pregnated with earthy salts (chiefly of lime and magnesia), but which can be isolated by the action of dilute acids ; or, finally, of calcareous salts in an almost crystalline state, form- ing rods or corpuscles, which, when treated with acids, leave only an inappreciable and structureless film of organic matter. The hard parts of all the Aporosa, Perforata, and Tabulata of Milne-Edwards are in the last-mentioned condition ; while, in the Octocoralla, except Tubipora, and in the Antipathide, and Zoanthide, among the Hexacoralla, the skeleton is either horny ; or consists, at any rate, to begin with, of definitely formed spicula, which contain an organic basis, and frequently present a laminated structure. In the organ-coral (Zubipora), the skeleton has the character of that of the ordinary stone- corals, except that it is perforated by numerous minute canals. The skeleton appears, in all cases, to be deposited within the mesoderm, and in the intercellular substance of that layer of the body. Even the definitely shaped spicula of the Octo- coralla seem not to result from the metamorphosis of cells. In the simple aporose corals the calcification of the base and side walls of the body gives rise to the cup or theca ; from the base the calcification extends upward in lamelle, which correspond with the interspaces between the mesenteries, and gives rise to as many vertical septa,’ the spaces between which are termed loculi ; while, in the centre, either by union of the septa or independently, a column, the colwmella, grows up. Small separate pillars between the columella and the septa are termed paluli. From the sides of adjacent septa scattered processes of calcified substance, or synapticule, may grow out toward one another, as in the Fungide ; or the interrup- ‘tion of the cavities of the loculi may be more complete in consequence of the formation of shelves stretching from sep- tum to septum, but lying at different heights in adjacent loculi. These are interseptal dissepiments. Finally, in the Tabulata, horizontal plates, which stretch completely across the cavity of the theca, are formed one above the other and constitute tabular dissepiments. 1 See Kolliker, ‘‘ Icones Histologice,”’ 1866. 2 Lacaze-Duthiers’s investigations on Astrwa calycularés prove that the septa begin to be formed before the theca. THE “TABULATA.” 147 In the Aporosa the theca and septa are almost invariably imperforate; but, in the Perforata, they present apertures, and, in some Madrepores, the whole skeleton is reduced to a mere network of dense calcareous substance. When the Hexacoralla multiply by gemmation or fission, and thus give rise to compound massive or arborescent aggregations, each newly-formed coral polyp develops a skeleton of its own, which is either confluent with that of the others, or is united with them by calcification of the connecting substance of the com- mon body. ‘This intermediate skeletal layer is then termed coenenchyma. | The septa in the adult Hexacoralla are often very numer- ous and of different lengths, some approaching the centre more-closely than others do. Those of the same lengths are members of one ‘“‘cycle;” and the cycles are numbered ac- cording to the lengths of the septa, the longest being counted as the first. In the young, six equal septa constitute the first cycle. As the coral grows, another cycle of six septa arises by the development of a new septum between each pair of the first cycle; and then a third cycle of twelve septa di- vides the previously existing twelve interseptal chambers into twenty-four. If we mark the septa of the first cycle A, those of the second B, and those of the third C, then the space be- tween any two septa (A A) of the first cycle will be thus rep- resented when the third cycle is formed—A CBC A. When additional septa are developed, the fourth and fol- lowing cycles do not consist of more than twelve septa each ; hence the septa of each new cycle appear in twelve of the previously existing interseptal spaces, and not in all of them; and the order of their appearance follows a definite law, which has been worked out by Milne-Edwards and Haime. Thus, the septa of the fourth cycle of twelve (d) bisect the inter- septal space AC; and those of the fifth cycle (e) the inter- septal space B C; the septa of the sixth cycle (f), Ad and d A; those of thes eventh cycle (¢), e Band B e; those of the eighth cycle (h), d C and Cd; and those of the ninth cycle (i), CeandeC. Hence, after the formation of nine cycles, the septa added between every pair of primary septa (A, A) will be thus ar- . ranged—A fdhCiegBgeiChdf A.’ The stone-corals ordinarily known as Millepores are char- 1 That the order of occurrence of the septa of various lengths, at the differ- ent stages of growth of a corallite, is that indicated, seems to be clear, whatever may be the exact mode of development of the septa in each cycle. 148 THE ANATOMY OF INVERTEBRATED ANIMALS. acterized by being traversed by numerous tubular cavities, which open at the surface, and the deeper parts of which are divided by numerous close-set transverse partitions, or tabular dissepiments, while vertical septa are rudimentary or alto- gether absent. These were regarded as Anthozoa, and classed together in the division of Tabulata, until the elder Agassiz published his observations on the living Millepora alcicornis, which led him to the conclusion that the Tabulata are Hydrozoa allied to Hydractinia, and that the extinct Ru- gosa were probably of the same nature. The evidence adduced by Agassiz, however, was insufhi- cient to prove his conclusions; and the subsequent discovery by Verrill that another tabulate coral, Pocdllopora, is a true Hexacorallan, while Moseley? has proved that Heliopora coerulea is an Octocorallan, gave further justification to those who hesitated to accept Agassiz’s views. The recent very thorough and careful investigation of a species of Millepora occurring at Tahiti,* by Mr. Moseley, although it still leaves us in ignorance of one important point, namely, the characters of the reproductive organs, yet permits no doubt that Millepora is a true Hydrozoén allied to Hydractinia, as Agassiz maintained. The surface of the living Millepora presents short, broad hydranths, the mouth of which is surrounded by four short tentacles. Around each of these alimentary zodids is disposed a zone of from five to twenty or more, much longer, mouthless zodids, over the bod- ies of which numerous short tentaclés are scattered, Each of these zodids expands at its base into a dilatation, whence tubular processes proceed, which ramify and anastomose, giv- ing rise to a thin expanded hydrosoma. ‘The calcareous mat- ter (composed as usual of carbonate, with a small proportion of phosphate of lime) forms a dense continuous crust upon the ectoderm of the ramifications of the hydrosoma, that part of it which underlies the dilatations of the zodids constituting the septa. As the first formed hydrosomal expansion is com- pleted, another is formed on its outer surface, and it dies. The “thecal” canals of the coral arise from the correspond- ence in position of the dilatations of the zodids of successive . hydrosomal layers, and the tabulz are their supporting plates. Thus the group of the Tabulata ceases to exist, and its 1 “ Natural History of the United States,” vols. iii. and iv., 1860-62. 2 Moseley, ‘‘ The Structure and Relations of the Aleyonarian, Heliopora coerulea,” ete. (‘+ Proceedings of the Royal Society,” November, 1875.) 3 Proceedings of the Royal Society,” 1876. THE REEF-BUILDING CORALS. 149 members must be grouped either with the Hexacoralla, the Octocoralla, or the Hydrozoa. The Rugosa constitute a group of extinct and mainly Paleozoic stone-corals, the theca: of which are provided with tabular dissepiments, and generally have the septa less de- veloped than those of the ordinary stone-corals. The arrange- ment of the parts of the adult Augosa in fours, and. the bilateral symmetry which they sometimes exhibit, are inter- esting peculiarities when taken in connection with the te- tramerous and asymmetrical states of the embryonic Heaaco- ralla. On the other hand, some of the ugosa possess oper- cula, which are comparable to the skeletal appendages of the Aleyonarian Primnoa observed by Lindstrém, and the te- tramerous arrangement of their parts suggests affinity with the Octocoralla. It seems not improbable that these ancient corals represent an intercalary type between the Hexacoralla and the Octocoralla. All the Actinozoa are marine animals. The