oe AGI Sy he Lam Sete tnteth tthe tetnnrane : manda La Belle Avimal Peli ai cens SihNe Adena titenintm acre Ce Pree IT Dara Nealon ipa atecc rhe “AYN n\nonAm aon AON MENaUsbateten ent SiN heismn ny Seen : tna Sunt one “Netw ASEAS Awa eet ea. PW act oe ee, eer e ee ASP Rot urilewhen pe tPA Neher, Se oy eteterinon ree meen nett noe, Nteencton weet wes Sere hen Saeeet hot Net tenes ony es sees INSTITUTIO S3IYVUEI Y Vt 7 INSTITUTIO S3IYVUEI INSTITUTIO INSTITUTIO . 1117 LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI NVINOSHLINS S31YVUaIT LIBRARIES NVINOSHLINS S3IUYUEI g NVINOSHLINS S31YuvuSst Gil LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILOLILSNI NVINOSHLIWS SMITHSONIAN S3!1YVYEIT LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITU z K Z ee hak Fd < ees = , - : ‘ * = > eae > = NG" > e = 2 = z : 2 = - 22) “ a 2 o z o = ao _ 2 w = = x. 22) fe) = > Zz 2 ee : g : at ace . LS QS a Zz = ve dp 2 SS = = YX 9 We z S = MZ yp 5 DYp 3 Wx = S SA zt MW 32 hy yf Ws & EN £ : Sy * Cy ESS 3 2 NK = > yh é Z = D oes a a a 2 wae = MON NOILALILSNI_ NVINOSHLIWS LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILMLILSNI NVINOSHLIWS S3IUW = 2) = 22) > 22] = 2] Zz x Zz z XN : = O WE = ” z +B = a WY vo a = Nx NY fava = (oa: — a =. Ny S a < = SY < c <% E < = Bo = = YN cc = a = a = AN ac 2 Se eee 5 = a AS = ae 4 2 pa NR oe z = z 4 Fe pie =) G11 LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN, INSTITUTION | NOILMLILSNI NVINOSHLIWS S31 8VY 17 LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN” INS ~~ Lc 8 S) = S) = fe) = ° a oo = YYy w = ow ; = w = Yy wo 2 5 Ei, ® S 2 Nag, 5 2 5 GY, d * ‘ > Ui ft i = ele a = = WS = 2 a "Ye Oh 20 = D* Fe D m Sw 2 = a = a) = a) = n rc = n = wo “iN NON NOILNLILSNI_NVINOSHLINS SaluvuURiT_ LIBRARIES, SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILALILSNI_ NVINOSHLINS S318) ; : ~ z x wn = un ul = Vie = = YY, =< = < = — \\ — |” — —, S re 2 5 we Ce ane a Z GI T_LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILOLILSNI_NVINOSHLINS S3IYVYGIT LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN: | 7 | ge at Pe aa sO aN es a ees Nee i i. Sig at aly . C wasn” \S i ’ NN bart = PRAR I i 2 ° a t % NSTI, es iS AL, : . ASA atm nite i IBRAR- ? Wr, i NOILNLILSNI Cpa ON Oc NOILNLI LIBRAR NOILALI LIBRAR NOILNLI. 70 NOLLALIZ NI TION NOILALILSNI NVINOSHLINS S31¥vVYdIT LIBRARIES SMI NVINOSHLIWS 4 GY “yy 4, INSTITUTIC saiuvua INSTITUTIC INSTITUTIO INSTITUTIC S31uYVvYya INSTITUTIC 4 39'No; Salyuvug S3JIYVYE!IT LIBRARIES NMLILSNI \ jj SB RARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILONILILSNI SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILALILSNI NVINOSHLINS S3IYVYUEIT LIB NVINOSHLINS S3I1YVUd SMITHSONIAN NVINOSHLIWS “SY SMITHSONIAN SMITHSONIAN NVINOSHLIWS SMITHSONIAN NVINOSHLIWS NS “Ss ~\ SMITHSONIAN ME, NVINOSHLINS SJIYVYEIT LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOI w S 2) = ae ” z aD z ee u 0 es Gi ae Ce & 2 G Wee, fone = jog at NS a Sak (aa = a {cy <5, a = w x INN = = = S F 53 IGN = 2 TEENA - = = ae Ves in te NWS = : z NG z ARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NONNLILSNI_NVINOSHLINS S31uvudiT LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOI Pas “e (of) “we % = Rees = oe = < = < = 5 = = = z = aR : : : £4 ; : : s Nai Yo fy NN IG) DSM NS g Z SY fl: S Zz WA's E AW 2.2 : - = a ee a ae NVINOSHLIWS LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI_NVINOSHLINS S31YVYaIT LIE Z wo S > “n 2 4 2 wn Wd , lJ wn n” 5 0 = Yiu, i) Zz -! Zz SAR IES_ SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILMLILSNI_NVINOSHLINS S31UVUEIT LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NO} S = S oS = Se aes S = ss = = 2 let aya aa) ata / 2, = : 2 5 2 IY > E i - = z re “yy 2 eX z is z Ce B eG a Z NLILSNI NVINOSHIINS S3IYVYEIT LIBRARIES g RARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI NVINOSHLIWS S31YVYEIT LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI NVINOSHLINS S3iYVYUSIT LIE NVINOSHLINS S3IYVYEIT LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN NVINOSHLIWS Wea NSS ‘ aN SMITHSONIAN NVINOSHLINWS WAS SMITHSONIAN KKe,. SMITHSONIAN SMITHSONIAN Ce Vin, Yi, We NVINOSHLIWS : + SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOI op) = 7) = a a) = = ep) s .G us GO b ee a ’ — ao = WRAY — Gites Y — a < 2 < = \ We E Vk a Z : : : eM = : “yy 5 = a % S ca S a 5 Z 3 : oa =I Zz > a) ae ALILSNINVINOSHLINS | S31NVYgI7 LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION | NOLLALILSNI NVINOSHLINS (S3INVUS!T LIE ay Tnas ‘\ = de S = S Ys Q 2 o > We 5 : = Gy > : 5 2 > SS, = > = ty Yj. > =) > 2 BN SN = 0 = Ve Mh ‘ag = = zu o = o z @ z = a RARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI NVINOSHLINS S31yuvugItT Ng NVINOSHLIWS S3Iu INSTITUTION NOI 4 4 NVINOSHLINS S31UVYEGITLIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN NVINOSHLIWS NVINOSHLIWS SMITHSONIAN SMITHSONIAN Ge, NVINOSHLINS st SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILOLILSNI_NVINOSHLINS S3IYVYaIT LIB SMITHSONIAN NVINOSHLIWS Ye VYGIT LIBRARIES RARTES IBRARIES SMITHSONIAN OPLALILSNI NOILALILSNI LIBRARIES NOLALIISNI LIBRARIES NOILNLILSNI SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILONLILSNI NVINOSHLINS S3!iY¥VvVYNGIT LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOI “OTs wie (Hibds Cs S mY _ ‘= ~~ 7 i! . © 7 : ei - © { . aan J a (4 | 7 oi -CARLILE P. PATTERSON reat SUPERINTENDENT | METHODS AND RESULTS / REPORT ON THE OYSTER BEDS | oF THE a JAMES RIVER, VA. AND OF TANGIER AND POGOMOKE SOUNDS \ “MARYLAND AND VIRGINIA , APPENDIX No. 11—REPORT FOR 1881 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1882 — > P u i ~ — + « Phy wv - 5 , + > \ . 1 ~~ - * = ‘S, q y. ON Sd Cyp US8 Lae) | UNITED STATES Mell. / S, COAST|AND GEODETIC SURVEY“ CARLILE P. PATTERSON SUPERINTENDENT Dwision of Mollusks METHODS AND RESULTS a. — f £ f REPORT ON THE OYSTER BEDS OF THE JAMES RIVER, VA. ine OF TANGIER AND POCOMOKE SOUNDS SANTHSONIAW MAY 18 1988 LIBRARIES, MARYLAND AND VIRGINIA APPENDIX No. 11—REPORT FOR 1881 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1882 ERRATA TO APPENDIX No. 1—COAST AND GEODETIC FOR 1881. Page 7, line 43 from top, for ‘‘ Moelius” read ‘‘Mébius.” Page 14, line 8 from top, for ‘‘up” read ‘‘rip.” . Page 24, line 34 from top, for ‘“‘Fog” read ‘‘Fox.” Page 27, line 44 from top, for ‘‘600,000” read ‘‘630,000.” Page 34, line 23 from top, for “light” read “‘bight.” Page 46, line 7 from top, for ‘‘welks” read ‘‘ whelks.” Page 46, line 10 from top, for ‘‘welks” read ‘‘ whelks. ” Page 64, line 3 from top, for ‘“‘suecessive” read “successful.” Page 65, line 2 from top, for ‘‘in” read ‘‘the.” Page 70, line 28 from top, for ‘‘welks” read ‘‘ whelks.” Page 70, line 28 from top, for ‘‘cinereus” read ‘‘ cinerea.” Page 70, line 36 from top, for “cinereus” read “cinerea.” Page 70, line 37 from top, for ‘‘welk” read ‘‘ whelk.” Page 70, line 38 from top, for ‘‘welk” read ‘‘ whelk.” Page 70, line 40 from top, for ‘‘welks” read ‘‘ whelks.” SURVEY REPORT Page 79, Appendix A, area Clump Point, for ‘‘382,000” read ‘382,500.” Page 79, Appendix A, area Horsey’s Bar, for ‘‘202,000” read ‘°202,500.” Page 79, Appendix A, area of Cow and Calf, for ‘‘292,000” read ‘‘292,500.” Page 79, Appendix A, area Cedar, for ‘‘337,000” read ‘‘337,500.” Pages 86 and 87, Appendix E, for ‘‘Monroe” read ‘‘Munroe,” and for “analysis” read ‘‘analyses” wherever occurring. Page 86, Appendix H, line 6, for ‘‘furnishes” read ‘‘ furnish.” Page 86, Appendix E, insert at head of table “parts in 1,000,000 of water.” " ai ec a ee es 5 ive (APPENDIX No. 11, COAST AND GEODETIC SURVEY REPORT FOR 1881.) REPORT ON THE OYSTER BEDS OF THE JAMES RIVER, VIRGINIA, AND OF TANGIER AND POCOMOKE SOUNLS, MARYLAND AND VIRGINIA. By FRANCIS WINSLOW, Master U. S. Navy, Assistant Coast and Geodetic Survey, Commanding Schooner Palinurus. PREFACH. In editing the following reports, it has been my endeavor, while preserving the original form and design, to omit such matters as would be of no interest to the public, but which were properly communicated to the Superintendent of the Survey. Of such a character I have considered the history of the work, in so much as it related to the difficulties encountered in its prosecution, and the various recommendations as to special matters connected with future operations. I have also considered that the same minuteness of description, either of methods or results, which was mani- festly proper in a report to my superior, would be unnecessary in a paper intended for general cir- culation. I have, therefore, in some parts, condensed the reports considerably, though always with care that the reader should experience no difficulty in following the steps- by which I nemeed any conclusion. In the manuscript reports and in letters to the late Superintendent, I have frequently testified to the kindness and assistance rendered me by the inhabitants of Crisfield, Md., and of the shores of the sounds, and I wish to again express, in a more public manner, my appreciation of their efforts, aud especially my indebtedness to Mr. T. S. Hodson, the collector of the port. My thanks are also due to the members of the Johns Hopkins Zoological School, to Prof. S. F. Baird, United States Fish Commissioner, to Mr. T. B. Ferguson, Maryland Fish Commissioner, to Mr. H. J. Rice, and Mr. W. H. Dall, and especially to Dr. W. K. Brooks for assistance rendered me. As such suecess as has attended my labors in this field is largely due to the zealous and effi- cient co-operation of my brother officers and companions on board the Palinurus, I have felt it their due that their contributions to the results should be known. I have accordingly prefixed to each report the names of my assistants and have specified those portions of the work for which they are in @ measure responsible. IT regret that it is not in my power cay more adequately express my appreciation of the zeal and energy they displayed, the arduous nature of their labors in the field, and the good judgment they showed in the compilations assigned them in the office, and while it is difficult to make a distinction, I feel my indebtedness to Master H. H. Barroll, U.S. N., to be greater than to any other one con- nected with the investigation. FRANCIS WINSLOW, Tieutenant, U.S. N. INSTRUCTIONS. The instructions of the Superintendent, dated August 2, 1878, directed that the investigation of the oyster beds should include the following: 1. The determination of the positions and areas of the oyster beds of the Chesapeake and its adjacent waters and the depth of water over them both at high and low water. 2. The determination of the character of the beds; whether natural or artificial; whether the 4 oysters were spread all over a given area, or grew in clusters of large or small size, or were scat- tered singly or in small groups. 3. The determination of the temperatures of the surface and bottom water at each locality and the velocities of the currents. 4, The preservation of specimens of oysters of different ages, from each locality, and speci- mens of the bottom and bottom water. 5. The determination of the existence of any deposit of mud or other earthy or vegetable material and the determination of the character of the bottom beneath the oyster beds. 6. The determination of the source of the sediment if any was deposited and the means of directing it, if injurious, away from the beds. Also to determine whether ice ever rested on the beds and so destroyed them. 7. The determination of the density of the water, with special reference to the question of dis- placement of the salt water by the fresh water from adjacent streams and rivers. The Superintendent also desired that the examination should, at first, be confined to a limited area and made exhaustive. Subsequently the investigation was to be extended as far as the means at the disposal of the Survey would permit. The instructions were received on the 3d August, 1878. On the 7th of that month the vessel sailed from Baltimore, Md., to execute them, and the party remained actively in the field until the 15th October, when the season closed. As the investigation was novel in design and execution, and as the difficulties encountered by the party were mainly due to the absence of all experience and previous exertions in the same field, I have thought it best to preface the account of the results of our labors by a short description of the methods employed in making the several determinations required by my instructions. METHOD OF CONDUCTING THE INVESTIGATION. The examination of the different beds was carried on in the following manner: 1.—DELINEATION OF THE BEDS. The services of an oysterman of experience, and who was well acquainted with the localities of the different beds, was first obtained; the vessel was then anchored in such a position as to enable-her use as one of the points for angling upon, and her position carefully fixed by sextant angles upon all points recognizable upon the chart. At the same time angles were taken upon any object that might be useful subsequently in fixing positions, either of the boats or schooner. By carrying forward our own points in that manner it was possible to dispense with signals, the erection of which would have occasioned much delay and the sacrifice of time and labor, to procure an unnecessary degree of accuracy. The boats then ran traverse lines, more or less open, over the adjacent beds, the size of the interior angle and the length of the line depending upon the supposed size and character of the bed; our general method was to work with the tide and endeavor to cross the lines as we returned over the ground. The “oyster pilot” was sent in one boat and one of the ship’s company, who was an old oysterman, was sent in the other. They were provided with poles, which were marked to feet, and continually probed and examined the bottom as the boat passed over the line. The depth of water and character of the bottom were recorded as in ordinary hydrographic surveys. The position of the boat was frequently ascertained by sextant angles, but as the ‘ points” were not always well defined, two angles were not considered sufficient, and angles on all prominent objects were taken. Occasionally, when in proximity to the schooner, mast-head angles and bearings were used for ascertaining the position of the boat, and in a few cases the bearing and distance of some well-defined point of land was estimated. At intervals the boat was anchored, her position fixed, and specimens of oysters, bottom, and water obtained, and the temperature of the air, and surface and bottom water, observed; the character of the substratum of the bottom was also noted, and the set and velocity of the current recorded. The observations for ascertaining the character of the bottom beneath the surface and those for temperature were more frequently made than the others, and the current was measured only at such points as would give a fair idea of the general set of the flood and ebb tides; but ~~ ir 5 whenever an oyster specimen was taken, all the observations, with the exception of those for strength and direction of current, were made. Only general instructions could be given as to the points on the beds where it was desirable to obtain specimens of any kind, or observations for temperature or character of bottom, and much was necessarily left to the discretion of the officer of the boat, not only with regard to those points but also as to the general delineation of the beds. _ So far as it went the work was satisfactory, but there were three great drawbacks to the use of the boats, viz: The time and labor necessary to effect anything with them, the inability to use the pole with any accuracy in depths over three fathoms, and the failure of the pole to discover any- thing but the solid beds. We attempted to use with the boats a small and light dredge made especially for us, but found it impracticable, the largest boat, when under oars, fully manned, or when under sail in a stiff breeze, being unable to tow the dredge or even to move it; consequently the boats were useless for collecting any information, except over solid beds in less than three fathoms of water. To define the limits of those beds lying in deeper water and of those not entirely solid, or where the oysters were scattered either in groups or singly, recourse was had to dredging with the schooner, using an ordinary oyster dredge of 36 inches width and with twelve teeth. This method was found to be so much more satisfactory in all respects, that all the boat work, whenever it was possible, was supplemented by dredging lines run by the schooner. Traverses were made as with the boats, and observations for ascertaining the character of the bottom, both of the surface and substrata, observations of temperature, and the selection of the various specimens, were carried on. The position of the vessel, however, was more frequently ascertained than had been customary in the boat work. The lowest possible rate of speed was maintained that was consistent with safe and ready manoeuvering (a matter of some difficulty), and the dredge put over at intervals varying from two to ten minutes, and depending upon the character and extent of the bed, depth of water, and ability of the crew to get the dredge in, it being at times necessary to heave the vessel to in order to recover it. The dredge was put over from the weather side, and, after having dragged a sufficient distance to insure its bringing up a specimen, should there be any oysters, was hauled in by hand. The presence of oysters on the bottom was readily detected by placing the hand on the dredging rope, the uneven, jumping motion of the dredge as it gathered the oysters and shells being distinctly perceptible. The dredge was usually on the bottom from thirty to forty-five seconds, which length of time was sufficient for our purpose and sometimes enough to fill the dredge, a catastrophe which was not desirable. Soundings were taken along the lines, and, with the character of the bottom, recorded. The following form for keeping the record was used and found to be of great value: RECORD. [Date, September 5,1878. Day-mark, S. Recorder, S. E. Stevens.] | | 1 : atic | 4 Time. | Depth. | Station. | Bottom. Dredge. jAmountan mound Right object. Left object. | ee to h.m. see.| | | i 1) BMD | 15 feet. 3 eevarde-| Over....) 4full------ 34 fms. | Clay Island Light-House. --.----- Red trees. BU llsosacoo=ac letiececeaa= lat eceecisce Taking 168 | WaOo Sone Reditreesise 25s eseceeeassan oie Tall trees. IDL WN) |sessocccse Weeiasseyersietll ceimerins ae Off bot. OyisliGMs, |loisseoscce PRA MGRO CS tea Roe ee yeaa ate Solomon’s Lump Light-House. ic ee — : | Specimens. Temperatures. eae ‘ | Angles. | 1 =a) dale: al ka a1 Remarks on oysters. General remarks. | Oysters.) Bottom. | Water. Air. | Surface. | Bottom. ie | (ios 5) | pene es | | ¥ = Sued ae Onnars | | fa} fe) fe) 52 08 | 3 | 1 | 1 3 flood. 59 68 68 Margersineleeeras seen see eres | Probed: 2 feet oysters, then 68 23 [Besekdhes| aqs5d5553 jeqeososslococg aad cesceeesibobedenzes| eenseescas Young growth and clusters ------) hard. 100 sail dredging to 22 00) ene. oa | sedansoces | aooosens [SOaR eee Sok SS eel Sa eene es Mee ete | Many young and drills; no sponge| southward. Wind, SW—3. i E | The number of oysters in the dredge, the portion of the dredge filled, the character of the oysters, whether old or young, single or in clusters, large or small, the character of the parasites attached to the shells, the amount of grass, seaweed, and sponge in the dredge, the estimated 6 number of young smaller than the marketable size, and other pertinent remarks, were noted after each haul. At intervals during the day the number of dredging vessels in sight was recorded for reference, and subsequently an attempt was made to collect data for the estimation of the number of oysters taken in a day by each sail. At each anchorage the current was measured. From the results given by using the pole in the boats and the dredge in the schooner, the outlines of the beds have been traced on the chart, the lines defining their limits including nearly all stations when the number of oysters was greater than one-tenth to the square yard, and though in some portions of the beds, as shown on the charts, the number was less than one-tenth, vet other circumstances, such as the character of the bottom, the amount of shell brought up by the dredge, &c., have caused them to be ineluded as part of the beds. The limit of scattered oysters can only be considered as approximate, as the lines were drawn from information received from local oystermen and from such observations as we were enabled to make ourselves. As has been already stated, the boats were unable to ascertain the positions of any but the solid beds or large clusters, and the schooner not being able to work in less than 8 feet of water, our ability to determine the area covered by the scattered oysters was necessarily limited. As that area, and indeed that of the solid beds also, is variable, changing from year to year, the line inclosing the scattered oysters may be considered as accurate as it is necessary to have it. TIDES. The mean rise and fall of the tides in the sounds is so slight (amounting to 2.5 feet in Tangier and 2.4 feet in Pocomoke), and generally the depth of water over the beds so great, that it was not considered necessary to establish tide gauges except in one case; such tidal corrections as have been applied to the soundings have been obtained from the Coast Survey Tide Tables. A coim- parison of the rise and fall of the tides, as given by those tables, with that given by a tide-statf erected at Clay Island Light-House, showed that during the months of October and November the greatest difference was nine-tenths of a foot. Owing to the vernal and autumnal gales the most considerable departure from the usual height of the tidal water occurs at those seasons, and it is therefore probable that one foot will represent the maximum error of the Coast Survey Tide Tables, and 34 feet the maximum rise of the tide in either sound. Considering the great depth of water over the majority of the beds, it was coneluded that the slight variation in those depths caused by the tides could have but little influence on the oysters, and consequently the correction of sound- ings except in depths less than three fathoms has been neglected. ' SPECIMENS. The oyster specimens, 754 in number, were selected from large quantities brought up by the dredge and tongs, the endeavor being to take three specimens of different ages from each locality. One specimen of an adult oyster of two years’ growth or more, one of from one to two years’ growth, and.oue less than a year old, were usually selected. Shells, either old or new, and especially those having a Jarge number of young clinging to them, were also occasionally preserved, and though a few specimens of oysters that had been transplanted were secured in order to show the effect of change of water, bottom, and depth, yet no examination of the planted beds was undertaken. In the selection of specimens we attempted to reserve such as would indicate the effect of different natural conditions. At the close of the day’s work the oyster specimens were washed in salt water, opened carefully with a sharp-pointed, thin-bladed knife, and the upper valve detached from the muscle, and then replaced. A small wooden peg was then placed between the bills of the shell. the valves tied tightly together with twine, and the oyster wrapped in cotton cloth of a very open texture. The whole was placed in alcohol. The wooden peg kept the shell open sufficiently to allow the alcohol access to the body of the animal, and the cloth wrapper prevented the destruc- tion or loss of anything of interest which might be attached to the shell. Six parts of alcohol to four of water were used, and to each specimen was attached a wooden label showing from whence the oyster came. g BOTTOM AND WATER SPECIMENS. The specimens of bottom were obtained from large amounts of sand, mud, and gravel, brought up by the dredge or tongs. When the bottom was hard, an ordinary bottom specimen cup screwed into a 25-pound lead was used, but over the solid beds, or where the bottom was of hard sand, it was very difficult to obtain anything, either with dredge, tongs, or lead. The specimens of bottom water were secured by using the drop-water cylinders, which are fully described by Lieut. Frederick Collins, U. S. N., Assistant Coast and Geodetic Survey, in his report on the ‘Densities of the Waters of Chesapeake Bay and Tributaries,” published by the Survey in the Report for 1877, Appendix No. 14. The cylinders worked as successfully as during the previous summer, and there can be no doubt that the water brought up by them was a speci- men of that at the bottom. All the specimens were tested with a hydrometer, and the readings reduced to those at the standard temperature of 60° F. SUBSTRATUM OF BOTTOM. The character of the bottom beneath the surface was roughly ascertained by means of an iron probe, 5 feet in length, attached to a long wooden staff. The probe was thrust as far as possible into the bottom, and the composition and character of the substratum estimated, the different constituents, whether sand, shell, mud, clay, or gravel, being easily recognized. Owing to the velocity of the currents, the speed of the vessel, and the difficulty of handling a long staff, but few determinations of the character of the substratum were made when the depth of water was greater than 3 fathoms. CURRENTS. The currents were measured by a current meter, or by an ordinary chip log, though the latter was not used frequently. The position of the stations for measuring the current was left to the discretion of the officer of the boat, but a sufficient number have been occupied to show the set and strength of the maiu current, and the effect on them of the prevailing winds. NUMBER OF OYSTERS TO THE SQUARE YARD. The number of oysters to the square yard was found by using a ground log in connection with the dredge. From the information derived from experienced oystermen, and from our own exam- ination of those beds that had been dredged, I was of the opinion that a dredge, when of consid- erable size, and dragged slowly, usually collected everything met by it in its course. Considering that, at the suggestion of Mr. Rice, I used a small ground log to measure the distance traveled by the dredge. As that instrument was exactly one yard in width, it was concluded that it swept approximately clean one square yard for every linear yard it passed over. The ground log consisted of a small lead, a few ounces in weight, attached to a light line 1,000 feet long; between the lead and line was a length of copper wire of 20 feet; the line was marked every 5 fathoms and kept in a tub or on a reel ready for use; the lead was conical in shape to prevent its catching on shell clusters. When the dredge was thrown over the lead was dropped to the bottom and allowed to remain there, the line running out freely until the dredge was lifted off the bottom, when the line was stopped and the number of fathoms run off with the number of oysters in the dredge recorded. The dredge was not allowed to remain on the bottom long enough to be filled, consequently none of the oysters were lost from its inability to receive them. Though the foregoing method was imperfect it was the best that could be devised under the circumstances, and a similar method was used by Moelius in ascertaining the number of oysters on the Schleswig-Holstein bed. From the very small number of oysters to the square yard, as shown by the method, from the small number of oysters it assigns to the beds, and from comparison of the latter number with the number known to have been taken off the beds during our stay in the sounds, it is evident that the “number to the square yard” given in the records of the work are useful for comparison only; for in almost all cases the number of oysters given to the square yard must be considered as far below the real number. For instance, the number of oysters on the beds in Tangier Sound, south of Jane’s Island Light-House, was estimated from the data of the ; | 8 record given by the dredge and log to be 7,994,692, while from other observations I am positive that at least 2,000,000 oysters were taken from those beds in six days at the commencement of the oyster season. Such could hardly have been the case had there been but 8,000,000 oysters on the beds, and consequently we must regard the “number of oysters to the square yard,” as shown by the method used, only valuable as establishing an initial number and standard by which the increase or decrease of oysters on the beds may be ascertained, and by which one bed or locality can be compared with another. Alone, the results of the dredge and log are valueless. TEMPERATURE OF THE WATER. It was originally intended that the temperature of the bottom water should be obtained by means of thermometers attached to the ‘drop cylinders” used for obtaining the specimens of water from the bottom, and six of those cylinders were fitted at the office with mercurial thermometers, inclosed within the spindle upon which the cylinder moves, the bulb of the thermometer being a little above the center of the cylinder when closed on the lower disk, and the graduated stem being exposed above the top, thus allowing the temperature to be read within any limits that would probably occur. Under the direction of the assistant in charge of the office, a series of experiments were made by Mr. H. W. Blair, in order to ascertain the correction to be applied to the thermometers when moved through strata of water of different temperatures, and from water of one temperature into the air at another. With tables of corrections derived from those experiments, and with care in using the apparatus, we hoped to arrive at results that would be very nearly correct, but I regret to say that upon the first occasion when the cylinders were tried the thermometers were shown to be useless. The cylinder is closed upon the lower metal disk by means of a spiral brass spring, which also holds the cylinder down firmly, thus preventing the escape of the specimen. The spring acts with considerable force, and we found that invariably the shock of the closure of the cup was sufficient to break the mercurial column and prevent any reading of the thermometer. Attempts were made on board the vessel to remedy the evil by diminishing the strength of the spring, and by placing a rubber buffer on the lower disk, but we were unable to prevent leakage, and subsequently the same difficulty was experienced at the office. Owing to the failure of the thermometers in the water cylinders, and the inability to obtain any apparatus, at so short a notice, in time to be available for the season’s work, we were forced to use ordinary unprotected thermometers, furnished by the Coast Survey Office, with corrections established by experiments made previously and subsequently to the work of the party. The thermometers were fastened to a lead, lowered to the bottom, and kept there a sufficient time to acquire the temperature of the surrounding water. They were then hauled up as rapidly as possi- ble and the temperature read; at the same time the temperatures of the air and surface water was noted, Owing to the rapid change of reading when the thermometers were moved through strata of different temperature, the observations are only reliable when the temperatures of the air, surface, and bottom water were identical. As the investigation extended over so short a period of time, and as the spawning season had closed before we arrived on the ground, the recorded temperatures are of little interest, and have been omitted in the following papers. NAMES AND AREAS. In naming and describing the beds I have used the local names given them by the oystermen. The term “rock” is with them synonymous with “bed,” as they regard only the solid portions of the area covered by the oysters. In the following pages the term ‘‘ rock” indicates the solid, or approximately solid, portions of the bed. Areas are given in feet and miles. When the latter unit is used it is the nautical mile of 6,080 feet, and not the statute mile. 4 9 REPORT OF THE INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED DURING THE SUMMER OF 1878. My subordinates and assistants during the season were Master H. H. Barroll, U.S. N., and Mr. S. E. Stevens. Mr. Barroll tested the water specimens, 475 in number, and corrected the hydrometer readings for temperature; and compiled and arranged the record books and the various tables appended and referred to in the report. Mr. Stevens assisted in plotting the work, caleu- lated the areas of the beds and of the bottom covered by scattered oysters, and developed the pro- files of the bottom. OYSTER BEDS OF THE JAMES RIVER, VIRGINIA. The examination of these beds was a very hurried one, and the delineation must be regarded as merely approximate, being the result of a hasty reconnaissance. On that account no attempt has been made to produce a chart similar to that of Tangier and Pocomoke Sounds, but the ouat- lines of the beds, as shown by a few traverses run by the boats and as indicated by the local oysterinen, have been sketched in roughly. According to such information as it was possible for us to obtain, the beds do not extend above Deep Water Light, with the exception of a few small ones that are seldom fished on the account of the inferiority of the animals. We had not time to determine ourselves whether the information was correct, but I presume it to be so. Below Deep Water Light the beds of any consequence are twelve in number, and of a total area (approximate) of 10.4 square miles. Taking them in order from Deep Water Light to Hamp- ton Roads they are the Mulberry Point Bed, Point of Shoals Bed, Jail Island Bed, Blunt Point Bed, White Shoal Bed, Thomas’s Point Bed, Kettle Hole Bed, Brown Shoal Bed, Bally Smash Bed, Naseway Shoal Bed, Cruiser’s Bed, and the Nansemond Ridge Bed. The beds are “natural,” and the following remarks apply to all. . Currents.—Nineteen observations were made of the currents, and established that, over the Mulberry Point, Jail Island, and Point of Shoals Beds, the general set of the flood is NW., with a maximum velocity of 0.5 mile per hour, and the general set of the ebb SEH., with a maximum velocity of 1.7 miles per hour. These velecities were measured after or during moderate to stiff NW. breezes and spring tides, which conditions would increase the velocity of the ebb current considerably; it is probable that that velocity does not exceed one knot per hour under ordinary circumstances. The set both on flood and ebb is directly across the bed, but the main body of water follows the deep channel to the southward, the ebb striking the shore in Burwell’s Bay, and at times washing a good deal of it away. 6 Over the Blunt Point, White Shoal, Thomas’s Point, Kettle Hole, and Brown’s Shoal Beds the cur- rent sets NW. and SH., with a maximum velocity of 0.8 mile per hour on the flood. The ebb on the first quarter showed a velocity of 0.3 mile per hour, and probably the maximum velocity is but little over one knot per hour, as the great body of water passes to the southward of the beds. On the southern side of the river, over the Bally Smash, Naseway Shoal, Nansemond Ridge, and Cruiser’s Beds, the general set of the currents is NW. and SE., except where the very shoal spots are met, when the current becomes variable in direction though not diminished in force. When the shoal ledge lies in the general direction of the river the effect dovs not appear to be so great, but where the shoal extends across the main current it is deflected from its usual course, and forms strong counter currents and eddies. Thus over the Bally Smash Bed the ebb was found to set to the SH., with a maximum velocity of 1.1 miles; over the Naseway Shoal on one side of the shoal ridge the set of the ebb was SW., with a velocity of 0.4 mile per hour; while on the other side of the ridge an observation made at about the same time showed a set of 0.2 mile NE. When clear of theobstructing shoals the current sets to the northward and westward on the flood, and to the southward and eastward on the ebb, with an average velocity of 0.5 mile per hour. Over the Nansemond Ridge beds and inside of them the flood sets in towards Ragged Creek, and the ebb probably in the opposite direction. In order to determine whether the salt water over the beds in the river, and especially over the Mulberry Point, Point of Shoals, and Jail Island Beds was displaced by the fresh water of the spring ebbs, specimens of water were obtained at every two fathoms of depth, on a section across App 11-——2 10 the river just above Deep Water Light, at low water, spring tide. The density of the water at that point and time is shown in the following table: Section across James River. Location. Station. Depth. Tide. Specifie gravity. Remarks. Feet. Near Deep Water Light-House --....---- 2.2. ne A Surface. Low water... 1. 0083 A 6 PEO Vy Soar e : 1. 0084 Bottom, soft mud. B Surface |.---do----..- 1. 0088 B 12 sere (ON SAne ens 1, 0082 B 24 Bnei) HARB 1. 0088 Bottom, soft mud. Cc Surface. .-.. do\- 22-2 1. 0077 C 6 Ba UG) pono se 1. 0078 Bottom, soft mud. Comparing the specific gravity of the water obtained in the sections with that of two stations below Deep Water Light, which was obtained at nearly high water, a difference of density of 0.0037 is shown—1.0000 representing distilled water. So slight a change of density can hardly have any material effeet upon the oysters, and, except during long continued freshets, which occur sometimes during the spring, the animals in all probability do not suffer therefrom. According to the oystermen, during the winter ice frequently grounds on the shoal spots on the Beds, but never remains there long, unless the weather is of unusual severity, the strength of the current and the variability of the climate being sufficient to remove the ice in a short space of tine. As to the amount of damage done the oysters by the ice, opinions varied a good deal; the general impression was that, though the oysters were poorer in quality and flavor, the ice did not remain long enough to kill many of them. Only afew persons could be interrogated, and they were not very intelligent; but,in the absence of any opportunity to investigate the matter ourselves, their opinion is given. All the beds in the James River are subject to the deposit of mud and vegetable matter brought down by the freshets that oceur in the spring. The* Mulberry Point, Point of Shoals, and Jail Island Beds, owing to their position, are particularly unfortunate in this respect. The set of the current being directly across these beds, they are the first to receive whatever is held by the water. From the character and appearance of the river, it is probable that a large.amount of earthy matter is brought down by every ebb tide; but the velocity of the current is so great, and the shoal rises so abruptly between the Point of Shoals Light and Deep Water Light, forming a wall and barrier, that the principal part of the sediment seems to. be carried into Burwell’s Bay, where it has gradually covered and destroyed a large number of small beds. The spring freshets always cover the Mulberry Point, Point of Shoals, and Jail Island Beds, but not always for a sufficient time to very seriously damage the oysters, the current managing to sweep off the deposit in time to expose the cultch to the spat. Occasionally the damage is great; for instance, we were informed that during 1871 and 1872 there were a succession of heavy freshets, which destroyed the fishing for several years. In 1876, the mud having been washed away and the eultech exposed, a growth of young oysters was noticed -in all the beds about and above Jail Island. In 1877 the oysters about Deep Water Light were good, and probably during the coming seasons (18/879), the cateh on all the beds will be large, as at the time of our observations the oysters were numerous, with the young growth predominating. Apparently, then, it requires from three to five years for the beds to recover from the effects of heavy freshets, and as the oyster becomes marketable in about two years, from five to seven years must elapse from the date of the freshet before the beds can be profitably worked. Happily, the other beds are affected to a much less extent, though about the shoals on the southern side of the river the oysters are gradually deteriorating, presumably from deposit of dele- terious matter. The variability of the currents about these shoal places, and the fact that the depth of water about them is decreasing and the shoals increasing in size, appears to support the inference. On top of the Naseway Shoal, which is completely dry at low water, quantities of shells were found, and in its immediate neighborhood, especially to the northward and westward, the 11 oysters were of a very poor quality, having deteriorated much of late years. In addition to the deposit by the James River; the Nansemond Ridge and beds off Pig Point receive a portion of the sediment brought down by the Nansemond River, but, other causes not operating, that deposit would not be sufficient to seriously injure the beds. Below Jail Island, on the northern side of the river, the beds are not so much affected by the deposit, and the oysters found on them are of a better quality than those on the opposite side of the channel. Without incurring an expense not justified by the end sought, there is no practicable means of protecting the beds from this evil. Natural efforts appear to have sufficiently protected them in the past, and, if they are guarded in other respects, the loss on account of the deposit of matter brought down by the current, which is but occasional, will not interfere, to any great extent, with the industry. Mulberry Point Beds.—These beds comprise an area (approximate) of 3,656,000 square yards. They lie to the southward and westward of Mulberry Point, on the north side of the swash chan- nel, and northeastern side of the main channel. Point of Shoals and Jail Island Beds.—The Point of Shoals beds lie to the northward and eastward of the Point of Shoals Light, and comprise an area of 14,941,000 square yards, approxi- mately. They are bounded on the southward-and-eastward, southward, and southward-and-west- ward, by the main channel, the one-fathom curve of which cleariy defines the limit of the bed, except for a mile and a half to the southward of the light. The northern boundary follows nearly the edge of the swash channel, which separates this bed from the Jail Island Bed; the latter lies to the eastward of the swash and northward of the main channel, and has an area, approximately, of 5,730,000 square yards. Both the Mulberry Point and Jail Island Beds extend inshore as far as the sands which are found about at the one-fathom curve. The hydrography of the accompanying chart of the river was executed in 1874, and since that time very slight changes of depth of water can have occurred. It may therefore be accepted as giving the correct depth at the time of our examination. It shows that over the Mulberry Point beds the depth of water is from 1 or 2 feet in some places to 24 in others; on the Point of Shoals beds the same irregular bottom exists, the depth being from 2 feet to 30; and on the Jail Island beds from 3 to 16 feet are found. The soundings are given for mean low-water, the plane of reference; the mean rise and fall of the tides is 2.6 feet, and the maximum rise and fall 3.4 feet. The spring tides, however, fall 0.4 feet below the plane of reference, and consequently all the beds are subject to the grounding of ice of more than 16 inches thickness. As, however, the shoalest parts of the beds are situated on the boundary lines, they afford a certain amount of protection to the interior portions, the ice piling along the borders instead of lying in heavy masses upon the entire bed. On the shoalest parts of the beds the bottom was found to be a stratum of shells with a light covering of mud and a substratum of hard sand. On these shoal places the oysters and shells were most abundant. The oysters were not evenly distributed over the entire bed, but grew in detached patches and ridges on and in the vicinity of the shoals, with numerous narrow mud sloughs inter- secting and separating them. The deep water was found over these sloughs, and, generally speak- ing, the shallower the water the larger the number of oysters and the thicker and more solid the bed, this being especially true about the boundaries, where the beds rise abruptly from the main channel, and where great difficulty was found in attempting to penetrate them with the probe, while in the interior portions and in deeper water the surface stratum was of shells and mud, with 6 feet or more of soft mud underneath. On the Jail Island beds the bottom was of shells and light, yellow mud, the stratum being about 4 feet thick; below it the bottom was mud. From the appearance of the shells I judged that they had been covered for some time; and that, combined with the unusual thickness of the shell stratum, leads to the opinion that this bed was receiving a larger amount of the sediment brought down by the river than cither the neighboring oyster areas. The oysters on the three beds are of the class known among the dealers as ‘‘snaps.” They are small and poor, single or in small clusters of two or three, and when not transplanted are used for canning. There was no sponge or grass attached to the shells, and but very few of the usual inhabitants of a bed other than the oysters appeared to be present. Young oysters, of about one 12 year’s growth and under, predominated, and the proportion of voung to mature oysters was greater on the shoal spots and ridges at the edge of the bed than elsewhere, owing, probably, to the fact that such portions of the bed being shoalest, hardest, and cleanest, they ‘offered superior points for the attachment of the drifting spat. The oysters from the Jail Island Bed were considered superior to any in the river for planting purposes, though no reason was assigned for the preference. The oysters from all these beds are generally transplanted before being sent to market. No oysters were found in the main channel, and in the swash channel only a few, and those widely separated. Along the southwestern side of the river and main channel, in Burwell’s Bay, and off Day’s Point, are a few small beds, separated by large mud sloughs and many old “‘rocks” buried in the mud. The bottom is of red mud, with a substratum of mud or sand. The adjacent banks of the river are of red clay, and appear to be gradually washing away with the swift current of the river. The oysters found were older than those on the opposite beds on the Point of Shoals, but were of a poorer quality, and the beds are seldom worked on account of the scarcity and inferiority of the animals upon them. Blunt Point Bed.—This bed consists of a number of small rocks of a few hundred yards area, with mud sloughs between them. The area of the bed is about 1,125,000 square yards, but as the bed does not rise abruptly from the channel, like those already described, thus allowing a ready and nearly correct definition of its outlines, the area given for if must not be considered as more than a rough approximation. In the case of the Point of Shoals and Mulberry Point Beds the channels and s uds defined the limit of the oyster areas. In the case of the Blunt Point Beds the oysters are scattered in decreasing numbers from the center of the bed to the shores and channels, and the acvurate or even approximately accurate delineation of the area covered by them would have required far more time than was at our disposal. The bed is subject to a deposit of mud from the James River, but to a less extent than those beds already described; it also receives some sediment from the Warrick River. The bottom was found to be mud and shells on the surface, with a substratum of mud, except about the shoal places, where the substratum is hard, probably of sand. The contour of the bottom is more regular than that of the other beds, the depth of water as shown by the charf being from 7 to 8 feet. The oysters were more numerous about the shoals and were distributed in a manner similar to those on the beds previously noticed, being collected in groups aud patches separated by mud sloughs. They grew singly and in small clusters with no sponges attached and are of poor quality. Thomas Point, Kettle Hole, and White Shoal Beds.—These beds are similar in character to the Blunt Point beds. The shoal portions embraced by the one-fathom curve show the original forma- tion of the bed in the past, and mark what may be termed the backbone of the bed in the present. The areas (approximate) are Thomas Point, 949,000 square yards; Kettle Hole, 1,792,000 square yards; and’ White Shoal, 1,300,000 square yards. The bottom on the Kettle Hole and Thomas Point Beds was found to be of mud and shells on the surface, the substratum on the Kettle Hole being of shell and sand, and on the Thomas Point Bed of mud, except when near the shoal spots. On both beds no oysters were found on the shoals when the falling tide exposed them, but great quantities of broken shells were mixed with the sand; on all contiguous parts the oysters were very thick. Away from the sand shoals the beds commence to be broken up by mud sloughs, and the oysters are found in groups, the size and number of the groups being inversely proportional to the distance from the shoal. The Kettle Hole Bed is nearer solid and uniform than the others, the rocks being larger and closer together. The depth of water over the beds is shown by the chart, and the same general conditions with regard toit that were noticed on those beds already described exist on those now under consideration. The covering of mud over the animals was quite light, and the beds appear to receive less of the sediment in the river than those above or on the opposite side of the channel. The oysters were single and in small clusters. Those from the Thomas Point Bed were small and of an inferior quality; those from the Kettle Hole were larger, of good quality, and with a moderate amount of white and gray sponge clinging to them, and on both beds the pro- portion of young oysters of less than a year’s growth to those mature was very large. Bally Smash and Naseway Shoal Beds.—The Bally Smash Bed lies between Goodwin Point and 13 Fishing Point, and about one mile off the southern shore of the river. Its area is (approximately) 984,000 square yards. The Naseway Shoal Beds lie NE. of Fishing Point, about the Naseway Shoals, and comprise an-area (approximate) of 2,988,000 square yards. Both of these beds appear to have been originally formed about the shoals, those parts of the latter that are uncovered at low water showing a mass of shells broken and mixed with sand, and in their proximity the oysters are in greater numbers than near the margin of the bed.. The depth of water on the Bally Smash Bed is about 4 feet; on the Naseway Beds it is the same, except in the mud sloughs, where the depth is from 6 to 8 feet. The Bally Smash appears to be an unbroken “rock,” the bottom con- sisting of shells and oysters with a light covering of mud. The oysters were small and of the infe- rior quality known as ‘“‘snaps.” The strong current setting past and about the bed should have the effect of cleaning it, but the shoal, being dry at certain stages of the tide, appears to offer a barrier to the current in such a way as to cause a growth of the shoal to the northward and west- ward, where we found the largest amount of mud. The Naseway Shoal Bed consists of a number of detached “rocks” separated by mud sloughs, except in the vicinity of the shoal, where the oysters were found in the largest numbers, and where the bed is comparatively unbroken. The ‘‘rocks” appear to follow the general direction of the shoals, and are in ridges and groups, scattering and becoming smaller in size as the distance from the shoal increases. The oysters were single, of all ages, and generally of poor quality, but inshore from the bed, where a number of small detached “rocks” known as mud and sand rocks are found, the oysters were larger and older in appearance, and the young growth was missing. The bottom on the Naseway Shoal was a thin stratum of mud and shells on the surface, with a substratum of mud, very thick in the sloughs, and of hard sand and shell in the vicinity of the shoals. The Naseway Shoal Bed is supposed to receive a larger amount of the sediment brought down by the ebb-tide than any other bed on the southern side of the river. As will be seen by the chart, the Eastern Shoal runs across the direction of the current, and the water deepens quickly to the eastward of the shoal. The ‘‘rocks” lie closer to the shoal on the eastern side than on the western, while the mud sloughs are more frequent on the western side than on the eastern. From the above it would appear that the western part of the bed received the larger amount of deposit, and that. deposit was injurious to the oysters. Browns Shoal Bed.—The rocks composing this bed lie to the northward and eastward of the Naseway Shoals on the northern side of the river, and are situated, as their names indicate, on and about Brown’s Shoal. The approximate area of the bed is 1,828,000 square yards. The depth of water is from 3 to 15 feet, the average depth about 8 feet, and the deep water is found as on the other beds, over the mud sloughs. The bed follows the general direction of the shoal, and is not So extensively cut up as those previously described. The bottom was of shell with a little mud, resting on a substratum of shell or hard sand. The oysters were single, and in small clusters, and were not evenly distributed, being thicker on the edge of the channel, where also was found the largest number of young. The oysters brought up having but little mud on them, and the sound- ings and probe discovering but a light covering of mud, it is presumed that there is comparatively but little deposit on the bed. The principal part of the sediment brought down on this side of the river is probably received by the Thomas Point and Kettle Hole Beds, and as we were informed that ice seldom grounded on Brown’s Shoal, it is perhaps protected by the beds from that soil also. = CRUISER’S ROCK AND NANSEMOND RIDGE. Cruiser’s Rock and the beds of the Nansemond Ridge are situated off Ragged Island, on the southern side of the channel, and about the shoals extending from Barrel Point. Their approxi- mate area is 6,925,000 square yards. The beds are similar in character to those already described, being intersected by mud sloughs, and the oysters growing in groups and patches, but the mud sloughs are smaller and the area of the groups larger than on the other beds. The depth of water over the rocks is from 7 to 8 feet, and the surface stratum of the bottom consisted of shells and a small amount of mud. The substratum was, on the shoal parts of Cruiser’s Rock, hard and of sand or shell; on the Nansemond Ridge of soft mud and shell for about 5 feet. The oysters found grew in small clusters or singly, and were of inferior quality. They were not found to the north- 14 ward and eastward of the beds in greater depths than 15 feet, but exist to the eastward, scattered either in small groups or singly, as far as the channel into the Nansemond River. Inshore from the main beds are a pumber of small rocks and groups of oysters. From the character of the bottom on the Nansemond Ridge, it is inferred that there is a deposit of sediment accumulating on those beds, and from which Cruiser’s Rock is free. The fact is that the position of the Naseway Shoals is such that they protect the upper portion of the ridge (Cruiser’s Rock), while nothing interferes with the lower and middle portions, and the current out of the Nansemond River sup- ports the inference. In addition there is a strong tide up along the Nansemond Ridge which would probably cause a deposit of any matter held in suspension. I was informed that these last- named beds were less exposed to the grounding of ice and its subsequent piling than any in the river. Attached to the oysters taken from the Nansemond Ridge was a variety of sponge, red in color, that was subsequently found on the Craney Island flats, and in large quantities in Tangier and Pocomoke Sounds. It is not often found where there is much mud or sand on the bottom, or where the oysters are scattered singly, and its presence is a good indication of a solid ‘ rock,” though its absence is not conclusive as to the non-existence of the same. Between the Nansemond River and the channel into the Elizabeth River, and along Craney Island flats, are numerous small beds of unimportant area. They extend from the one-fathom curve out to about 23 fathoms, growing in ridges and groups with wide spaces of mud between them. The oysters found were single and larger than any in the James River. There was also more red and gray sponge clinging to them than had been noticed before. The bottom was gener- ally of mud and shells on the surface with, in the vicinity of the Elizabeth River, a hard stratum of sand and shells underneath, and in the vicinity of the Nansemond a substratum of mud None of the beds are important and are only fished for the local market. The practice of depositing on the Craney Island flats the matter dredged out of the Elizabeth River and Norfolk Harbor is gradually destroying the beds inshore, an | especially those near Craney Island. THE FISHERY AND ITS EFFECTS. The oysters are removed from the beds in the Janes River with the tongs alone, no dredging being permitted, and this may accou it to some extent for the beds being made up of patches and ridges of oysters. This formation is only advantageous in so much as if assists the rapidity of the current, and in all other respects if is anevil. Beds such as Cruiser’s Rock, Nansemond Ridge, and Point of Shoals, where the oysters in places are too thick, would be much improved by using a light scrape or dredge instead of the tongs in the fishery. If used with moderation, the surface of the bed would be cleaned, its area extended, the animals would be more evenly distributed and allowed more room for development, and the spat, having ala-ger and cleaner amount of “cultch” exposed, would probably attach in greater numbers. As, however, without stringent laws, rigidly executed, it would be impossible to keep the dredging within proper limits, and as there is but little prospect of such a thing occurring it is perhaps better, on the whole, that dredging is pro- hibited. The mud surrounding the beds is of too soft a character to permit any great extension of the present area, and thus one of the principal advantages of using the dredge would be lost while allits evils would be retained. Even as it is, the fishery is carried to excess, and all the beds, especially those in the neighborhood of Hampton Roads, are deteriorating. TANGIER AND POCOMOKE SOUNDS. The charts showing the oyster beds and limits of oysters in these sounds have been construeted from the data collected during the progress of the work. Ouly the natural beds are shown on them, and no attempt was made to carry the investigation beyond the sounds, except in the cases of the Manokin and Big Annemessex Rivers, where the beds were large enough to make their delineation and study advisable. The beds have been named from the solid **rocks” which they surround, and are indicated on the charts by the darker shades. In many cases it was a matter of some difficulty to determine the outlines of the beds proper, on account of their peculiar formation. It would have given an erroneous impression to have considered either the solid unbroken portions as the beds, or to have 15 taken the entire area upon which oysters are found, and I have therefore adopted the number of 0.1 oysters to the square yard as the standard by which to determine the outlines, all positions where the number fell below that standard being excluded from the beds, unless other cireum- stances have led me to a different decision. The light shades op the charts show the area occupied by scattered oysters, and, as already explained, must be considered only approximate. The broken lines show areas where the oysters are very widely separated. The dark lines have been drawn through those positions where the number of oysters to the square yard was above the average. In designating the oysters, the term “young growth” has been applied to the small oysters that were evidently but one year or one and a half years old. The term “young” has been applied to small oysters of the last brood that were found clinging to the mature oysters and old shells, and were, on an average, about one-ha!f or three quarters of an inch in length, or under. Tangier Sound extends north and south, in round numbers, 36 miles, from Watts’ Island to the head of Fishing Bay, and each side of the channel for 32 miles is lined with oyster beds of greater or less extent. These beds are continued, though the oysters are generally scattered, through Kedge’s, Hooper’s, and Holland Straits, and on the shoal between Smith’s and Tangier Islands. On each side of the channels into the Nanticoke, Manokin, and Big Annemessex Rivers, beds are found, and to a less extent in the Wicomico and Little Annemessex Rivers. By reference to the chart it will be seen that the only parts of the sound unoccupied by oysters are a short Space, one mile in length, off Deil’s Island, a space of two miles north of Jane’s Island Light and between the Big and Little Annemessex Rivers, and a stretch of 24 miles on the western side of the sound off Reach Hammock and the northern part of Tangier Island. With these exceptions, the oysters are to all intents continuous, and the total area covered by them amounts to 69.12 square nautical miles. eThe area of the beds proper, or that part of the total area on which the number of oysters to the square yard was at least 0.1, is 17.97 square nautical miles. Whenever the names of the beds could be ascertained they have been given to them, but in some cases they could not be, and [ have included them under general heads. Taking them from the head of Fishing Bay in regular order, they are twenty-eight in number. FISHING BAY BEDS. Under this head I have included all the beds lying in Fishing Bay, north of Clay Island Light- House, as they are subjected to similar influences of current, bottom, water, and temperature, and present similar characteristics. Most of the beds are of small extent, and many have special names; but the printing of the latter would encumber the chart, and consequently they have been omitted. Almost the entire bay, as far as Fishing Point, may be considered an oyster bed, oysters existing, though very irregularly distributed in groups of greater or less extent, over the whole area, except in the channel and close inshore. The groups, or “rocks,” are represented on the chart by the dark shades, and are forty-three in number, comprising a total area of 3,600,000 square yards. The remainder of the space, 25,605,000 square yards, is occupied by small groups and patches of oysters, separated by large mud areas. . The beds or “‘rocks” become smaller as the head of the bay is approached; they grow about any marked shoal, and all are somewhat broken by small mud sloughs, especially about the edges. The center of each “rock,” and noticeably on those in the middle and wider part of the bay, are comparatively solid, and about such places the oysters were found in greater numbers than near the mud sloughs and channel. In the northern part of the bay the depth of water over the beds is from 4 to 10 feet; over the southern part from 8 to 12 feet; the general depth, except in the channel, is about 11 feet. The bottom in the northern part of the bay is hard, of shell mixed with mud, the stratum being from 4 to 6 feet thick, over a stratum of sand on clay. The bottoin surrounding the beds was of mud. Soft, sandy bottoms were found along the shores, especially about Fishing Point and about the mouths of creeks. On the western, northern, and northeastern shores, marked ‘Planting Grounds” on the chart, the bottom was of clay with a light covering of mud on the surface. On the southern beds the bottom is a stratum of oysters and shells mixed with mud, 1 16 to 3 feet in thickness, over a stratum of mud, except in the southwestern part and on a small rock on the eastern side of the channel, near Cliy Island Light-House, where the substratum is of sand. The rocks are surrounded, like those to the northward, by soft muddy bottoms, except in the case of those in the southwestern part of the bay, where the surrounding bottom is of sand; those beds having sand as a substratum were less broken than the others. In the channel the bottom was invariably of soft, dark mud. ’ On the northern beds of the bay the oysters were single and of small size, with many of recent growth and probably about one year old. No sponges and but few of the usual mollusean inhab- itants of an oyster bed were discovered. On the extreme northern beds above Fishing Point, where the water is shoal, the beds old and much worked, the oysters are scarce, but on the other beds a very fair number were found. They were round and thin shelled and gave promise of developing into those of good quality, but the majority were too young at the time of our observations to be removed from the beds. On the southern beds the oysters were larger and of a better quality than those to the north- ward, though the young growth still predominated. Some clusters were found, but generally the oysters were single and more plentiful than in the northern part of the bay, but the same sparse- ness of the fauna was noticed. In the southern portions, where the bottom is sandy, a moderate number of young and many astyris were discovered, and in the same part of the bay many oysters were found buried in the sand 3 or 4 inches. I was not able to ascertain whether that was their normal condition or not, but am inclined to think the sand was moved over them by a gale which oceurred during the day previous to our examination. A remarkable absence of young of less than a year’s growth, and nearly a total absence of the drill, seem peculiar to the Fishing Bay beds. Were Point Bed.—South of the Fishing Bay beds and north of Hooper’s Strait Channel lies the Were Point Bed, comprising an area of 1,845,000 square yards. It is divided about the middle by a narrow strip of sand and mud into two irregularly-shaped portions, the upper one of which is similar in character to the Fishing Bay beds, though more broken. On both portions the oyste s grow in groups and patches, separated by mud and sand sloughs, the separation being more marked about the edges of the bed. Oysters are found over the entire surface, but are not evenly distrib- uted, the largest number on the southern portion being found along its northern and eastern border. The depth of water is from 9 to 15 feet, the general depth being about 11 feet. The bottom is of oysters and shells mixed with sand and mud, for about 2 feet, with a substratum of soft sand or mud. Where the groups occur the shell stratum is very thick, but is thin over and about the mud and sand spaces. Along the dark line on the chart, indicating the largest number to the square yard, the bottom is harder than elsewhere. The muddy bottoms were found prinei- pally on the eastern and southern portions of the bed, and the bed is bounded in those directions by bottoms of a similar character, while to the westward the contiguous bottom is of sand. The oysters were single, of moderate size and fair quality; very few young and no drills were found, either on the muddy or sandy bottoms; there was no sponge or grass among the oysters, and young growth of at least one year predominated. The scattered oysters near the bed were similar to those on it, though a few small clusters were found to the westward. i The number of oysters to the square yard, as given by the mean of fourteen measurements, is 1.25. On account of the shoaluess of the water and softness of the bottom, the number is more nearly correct than usual, but it must be remembered that in this, and in all other cases, where the number to the square yard is given, that number only expresses ‘ marketable” oysters, and does not include those which would not be accepted by a dredger, or which on account of want of age are practically incapable of reproduction. Shark’s Fin Bed.—Directly south of the Were Point Bed on the western side of the main channel and south of Hooper’s Strait Channel, lies a bed of moderate size, but celebrated for the quality of its oysters, called the Shark’s Fin Rock. It is regular in shape, extending ESE. and WNW. about one mile, and being about one-half mile broad. Its area is about 1,867,000 square yards Practically, it joins the Were Point Bed at the southern extremity of the latter, the space separating the beds being very small. In the course of time through the action of natural causes and the dredges this space will be obliterated and the union of the beds made complete. 1 hy tt nl wi, ToT si ge a 17 The Shark’s Fin is a more compact bed than its neighbor, though about the edges, especially those bordering on the main channel, the oysters exist in groups, as on the beds already described. The animals are spread over the entire area. but are found in larger numbers about the central and more solid portions of the bed, and are scattered more and more widely as the borders are approached. The southern limit is not very well defined, scattered oysters extending farther in that direction than in the others. The depth of water is from 8 to 15 feet, the general depth being about 12 feet. The bottom is hard, consisting of oysters and shells with mud and sand for about 3 feet, and then astratum of soft sand or mud. On the western part of the bed the shell stratum is much thinner and the substratum is hard sand. East of the bed the bottom, being that of the main channel, is of mud, and to the westward and southward of sand, soft near the bed, but growing harder as the distance from the bed increases. The oysters were single, of a moderate size and fine quality. Very few young and no drills or other enemies were discovered, but the young growth of less than a year were found in large numbers, and also a little of the red sponge on the northern part of the bed. The scattered oysters were similar in character to those on the bed, though a larger proportion of young growth was found to the southward, and the same absence of “young” and drills was noticed both on muddy and sandy bottoms. On the bed the number of oysters to the square yard was 1.01. The number to the square yard on the area covered by scattered oysters west of the bed was 0.04, east 0.03, and south 0.03. Nanticoke Middle Ground Bed.—On the middle ground between the channels into the Nanti- coke and Wicomico Rivers there is a large bed of an area of 3,195,000 square yards, called the ‘Middle Ground Rock.” It extends along the channel into the Nanticoke about 24 miles, and its greatest breadth is three-quarters of a mile. The bed is broken in many places, as will be seen on the chart, where only the larger divisions are shown, and the oysters grow in groups and patches of different areas with mud sloughs separating and intersecting them in all directions. The whole bed is broken up in this manner, but isis less noticeable on the northern and soutbern portions than on the central. The depth of water is from 8 to 21 feet, the deeper water being found along the western edge of the bed, where it borders on the channel, but, as the shoal rises abruptly, the parts of the bed covered by deep water are of small extent, and the general depth may be considered as about 11 feet. The bed is clearly defined by the channel of the Nanticoke on the west and the sands on the east. The bottom is a thin layer of mud over a stratum of shells and oysters from one-half foot to 5 feet in thickness. About the middle and western portions of the bed the substratum was soft mud, while on the northern, eastern, and southern portions hard sand was found underneath the shell stratum. The bottom on the central part of the bed in many places appeared to consist of alternate strata of shells and mud and on the northern and southern parts the general character of the bottom: was much harder than on the central portion. To the northward and eastward of the bed the bottom was of hard sand or fine gravel, and probably the lowest stratum of the bed bottom, could it be reached, would be found of similar nature. South and west of the bed and in the channels the bottom is soft mud. Only a few oysters were found iu the channel into the Wicomico, and none, in that into the Nanticoke. The oysters were generally of an inferior quality and small size, and grew singly and in small clusters, though the number of the former was comparatively small. No young were found, but many young growth, probably about one year old, and no sponge, grass, or drills. Along the edge of the Nanticoke Channel the shells were blackened, probably by the mud. On the west side of the Nanticoke Channel, north and east of the one-fathom sand shoal, there are a few small beds, comprising a total area of 270,000 square yards. The depth of water over them is from 4 to 8 feet, and they are unbroken but separated from each other by spaces of mud or sand. Over these spaces the depth of water increases. The bottom is a stratum of shells, about one foot in thick- ness, over a stratum of sand and clay. A light covering of mud lies on top of the shells. The oysters were single, with many of a young growth. Many shells, but no young or drills, were found. West of these beds and southeast of Clay Island light the oysters are very thinly scat- tered, in small groups or singly. The three-fathom curve approximately defines their limit to the App. 11 3 18 southward and westward, and the one-fathom curve the northern limit. The bottom is of mud or sand, the latter being found inshore. Clump Point Rocks.—These are small beds lying on each side of the channel into the Wicomico River and between Long and Clump Points. They are of small area, comprising collectively but 382,500 square yards, and lie in from 5 to 10 feet of water; they are separated from each other by the muddy bottoms of the channel or sloughs. All the rocks are broken in many places, the oyster groups separated by spaces of mud and sand, the latter species of bottom being found principally near Long Point. On the rocks the bottom is of shells and mud, with a substratum of mud. Very few oysters were found on the bottoms surrounding the rocks, and those discovered grew in small groups, the number and size of which decreased very much to the eastward of Long Point. The oysters were very scarce and resembled those of the Nanticoke Middle Ground in general character, though a larger number of single ones were found than on that bed. Horsey’s Bar and Tyler’s Rock.—These are comparatively small beds, lying on the southern side of the Nanticoke Channel, southwest of the Middle Ground and north of Haine’s Point. The first bed extends north and south three-eighths of a mile and east and west one-eighth of a mile. Its area is 202,500 square yards. The second bed lies southwest of Horsey’s Bar, and is one-half mile in length and breadth, and comprises an area of 675,000 square yards. Both beds are unbroken, except about the edges, and on the major portion of each bed the oysters are evenly distributed. Along the northern and southern boundaries, where the beds border on the channels, the oysters are found in groups, separated by mud sloughs. The depth of water over Horsey’s Bar is 12 feet, over Tyler’s Rock from 14 to 16 feet. The bottom consists of a stratum of shells from 1 to 2 feet in thickness, on a stratum of hard sand; on top of the shells was a light layer of mud. The oysters were small, single, and of poor aati and those of one year’s growth pre- dominated. No young, drills, sponges, or grass were found on the beds. Drumming Shoal Bed.—This bed lies on and about the shoal off Haine’s Point, ae which it derives its name. It is one mile and three-quarters long and three-eighths of a mile wide, and extends in a northeasterly and southwesterly direction along the eastern edge of the main channel of the sound. Its area is 2,430,000 square yards. The bed is unbroken, the central and southern portions being remarkably hard and solid. About the edges, as with the other beds, it is inter- sected by mud sloughs, and the oysters grow in the usual groups and detached patches, but gen- erally they are evenly distributed, a slight difference existing in favor of the shoaler and central part of the bed lying on the Drumming Shoal. The depth of water is from 10 to 20 feet, the deeper water being found on the northern part and along the western border. The major portion of the bed has but 11 feet over it. On nearly the whole bed the bottom consists of a stratum of shells with a light covering of mud over a stratum of hard sand. On the extreme northern part the substratum was mud, and the surface stratum of shells not so thick as elsewhere. The oysters were single and in small clusters; a moderate number of shells and a little of the red sponge was found. Inside of Drumming Shoal is a small bed called Haine’s Point Rock, which has been included in the description and area given for the Drumming Shoal Bed, with which it is closely connected. Cedar Rock.—This bed lies about one-half mile south of the Drumming Shoal and comprises an area of 337,500 square yards. The depth of water over it is from 12 to 17 feet and in all respects it is similar in character to the Drumming Shoal Bed. On the western side of the sound, along the edge of the channel, the beds are nearly continu- ous from the Shark’s Fin to the Terrapin Sands, a distance of about 11 miles. This space was originally divided into three portions, each locality having a particular designation, but at present it is difficult to define their limits, the spaces separating the beds having gradually diminished until they practically have ceased to exist. The dark lines on the chart indicate the positions where the largest numbers of oysters are found, and will show approximately the situation of the original unbroken “rock” from which the locality derives its name. The oysters taken from this region are known in the market as ‘‘Grass Tangiers” and have a good reputation, both for size and flavor. The Cow and Calf Beds.—These are two small beds lying on the edge of the channel and south of the Shark’s Fin. This area is 292,500 square yards. The smaller bed, called the Calf, has from 4 ~ - Coast and Geodetic Survey Report for /88/ aN 0 => Bub guy be Suga w ou ouu Ueda oeeus coc ceTsnacesagaeeseeseeeccecescetaecezer Seessee]eesceusceece at 1 HH Hi HEH DIA G A 7 fre} pet od eee eee eee ch Grecersceauesea Cuest tResuOIEEENeceazeese : FEE HEE Dan a pep BEERS PRD H feta Ha-H age SSS SES SS0e5 SoG 0era50 gia Cy ro ane SERRE REESIEae lL Geaeee8 = B Ty SEES SEseSuesea teal pirccTseQesd teeeeeeeer EERE EEE Espa es cH CCE ESD CH Pee ieee eta al Braet Glee ceeee eee tenes ceeeeeeees re coe rs HEE Peceuvases secezsceus vey teed! 4;) tuabeusaberseeeaasenaeenvest Sanene Ct EEE EE EEE EEE AVAL WA BREE EEE Baeo ere eeeeeeeeseeneceeeereceee mma TET Paes aeeeeeeeneeres Srssssaeee SEETTCESES CREED : eigiee Sesseseeteescceecs SeSESESESTSSESTESSTGeesTessrraeeeaee SSTEESECEVIEEEIESE [| Begeceece Jeeg acu 8a SSOSSERee8 aeee SeeeeSeeGeeeeleaaean HHH BEE SERGE SGee HHH SURSEETaeneersaserreesee SHEE FH PEE Geese oBee Ceoeeceoeedaeeod ae a HH HA tt een Po OH Shea seaveeueeesseeeesanss SUSGCL ES ESCeseeeenea GEGGSESESTSTEESECECE Bete cee peeeencece cese0 Olas] scan eeetat (ete cecels coeeeeeens Soeereceeroeeeeseece SEREMED EEE ASSSSIRSES CSSSEEESESERETOSEEE) (cCaceicct csesseee’ceuessenet teeeuaeeee sudestecsdonteantontosstostanttasttastactesstecteactastfastiasfasifasttattt se eus Geass casas a scseeaesa2e/s scares scceasassusaetuael gases eeereeereeeeree Baas casua gas sessues suns seeseeee die) 7 777 ¢asuesaaasussuasber se euseceaseseseee SEseapeseaseessesesaetestt rte EE EEE ano! aoa EEEH CCH HEE EEE EE SSOnGGeRSGCIaEGE i sitceeorees EE EEr eat Co HoH caaae Spot reted eeeeeceeteesetete HHH Rees ReSESSa [| Eft Hissssst/ eet fafasceet ECE Ee eet a Fain tele laele pa same w a sinane f L re eH BoSseeese t | : Beane seactasestfaria: : SH - serartacetictas BISESESEsSi Seseesse eed Eeniseeese T os SS goad cetectdeateasttastastastsetrartiattecttcrie: Fee Eee EEE EEE SBESUESSECESDESe coo : tata bslateiee i HH Po coh H SaaRESaEETE : Semsee H H H co aoe sled tet | SHUREERIGEISS SEEETEEESUOCEEEUOGS."2E:er™ aidaes pereeseaeee Fe0ea co A Ta C] Saen5 rH Hee Sedeedecsssstactactiaiy: Wasttattacttastestestrestartartiastectestieasa: | | i Bao bose eans PTT TT a | pf of ff io es oc a HSBAASaeees RERESSS EES RR0RSeh0 Seeeseoseo BRSeSIBy SE ha SSPeeees lee ees ORs sss eSsGSEC008R000 Be aeEnTaeGerESeSesSTaeeeraGeeersnseda’. a caueaseaeeereacesersoees reaeesa gases 2aeraa2 BiCESEOEED sees Eoseeedtactz. catestecsteazecstacteastastanrtatioufarifects SCeeeCaeoaen Hy TI HY (Ao {fia i a a i naa Poo TI Ree BeGGueueeteuserececreess ais BEBDS ARERR eS BES Seeeeced Becca cH Lit | tetas) an Cy Z Bo — Pry HEHE SEIRRIEISAS = : all | He ibe re 4 a a ioe 19 9 to 16 feet of water over it; and the larger bed, the Cow, has from 9 to 11 feet. The beds consist of large groups of oysters separated by mud sloughs; the “rock” itself is a very hard and thick stratum of oysters and shells, into which we could not force the probe more than 24 feet. The oysters were small, with about two-thirds of young growth; neither young nor drills were found. The number of oysters to the square yard was 1.51, which is probably more nearly correct than usual, the hauls of the dredge being made under exceptionally favorable circumstances. On the western side of the channel and Sound and due east of the southern part of Bloods- worth Island is a large bed, the name of which we were unable to ascertain. It is two miles long, extends north and south, and is from two-eighths to five-eighths of a mile wide. Its area is 4,027,000 square yards. The eastern part of the bed is unbroken, but the western portion and the extreme eastern border are cut up by mud sloughs, which separate the oysters and leave them in groups of different sizes. Along the eastern part, almost immediately after striking the bed, we discovered a shoal ridge about 200 yards wide, which was unbroken and had a depth of water over it of 10 or 11 feet. To the westward of this ridge the water deepened quickly 3 or 4 feet, but the general depth of water over the bed is from 10 to 14 feet. The oysters are distributed over the entire area, but unevenly, the largest number being found on the central and southern portions of the bed. The bottom was found to be generally a stratum of shells, oysters, and mud, of about one foot in thickness, over a stratum of mud. Along the shoal ridge oysters and shells were found as far as the probe could penetrate. To the westward of the bed the bottom is soft sand.or mud, the sand predominating and becoming harder as the shores of the island are approached. To the eastward the bottom is soft mud. The oysters were single and of moderate size. Large numbers of young growth, but neither young nor drills, were discovered. | 1.0132 | zebb..-...- Only one specimen..-.......----- — . 0012 1.0120 | 4 flood ....-.-. Only one specimen. Drumming Shoal - - a | Grass Tangier ---..--.. 1.0144 4 flood ....-- ieintthe channel ssee-= sere eee . 0024 1.0120 _ Low water.. Middle of bed. *Turtle Egg Rock ..-..| 1.0120 | 3 flood ...-.. | Seve aesce ck eee kara cte thee az CONCER [ase ac cel eee cee Ee eee Chain Shoal...... PS ae 1.0145 | 4 flood ...... pesSsbneseusencoasessaapcaseonen= . 0022 1. 0123 | 2 fiood .....- | Mud Rock ....--..----. | 1.0144 | 3 flood ....-- | SERS ON ote fears Sea es abt Ae 0008 | 1.0136 | 3 ebb -..-.-- Muscle Hole.-......... 1. 0157 | 4 ebb ....--- ies ee (Serie ebaene cee eee Se meerate . 0012 | 1.0145 Low water Pivey Island Bar. -...| 1.0150 | 4 ebb ....-... | ‘South of beds2- 2-2 =jee= - 0019 1.0131 | 4 ebb -...... Middle of bed. Manokin River .---.--- | 1.0152 | 2ebb 2 .----= Lower beds... a a 5 a 45 Fs ea Bano P Oey ° 2 © a) ) 2 S I + 5 a A Locality. FATS eens a oa a; om = on | D ee a BO eee ne | ge ae Vee cer H ee eal ecg tees ie) a ar mH I m mt im Hm Bf BS Be a | Bea BO ca See Se eee ccin | eee ee oma) ae ore 8 Hi a 3 g 8 Be | Ne 3 a § S ta ee Bm = - = a = =} = t=} ar} = r=] S 3 =, = — A A A A Zi A A ea A a a) aa) ey || pay Jobhnson'siBedessesee ee ee 18 SOM Os2ia| dees 54 OTe ler 20) 65; 0:1 | 0:92 60 2.0 0.4 6 0.80 Dog Fish Bed...... eee (32) 218 (, 0.68 us) (dee te) (0.65 J07) ANS) 5: eee Serra eae 152 Trevise Bed ..........-.- Elf as J 214 30 Nees a8 TT Oyetet -DI SE) We ceelnccsselloatecoreseoee 3 \| 2.22 ‘| 0 702 | 0.42 | eye | eae ShelliBedieepeer erences 31 88 j | | 0.42 37 | 0.88 |. 14 1.78 OB) EO || 833) ) SB | (SO jecoses IEE Ul soaanoegocacsaaac 16 44 (| 0.81 36) 0.50 18 0. 44 8 5YO) NECeii a Bate seie we se Meee 359 0.69 | 248 0.91 | 228 0.74 170 | Muddy Marsh Bed...--.... 22 59 | 0.3 | 0.20 12 | 0.03 | 0.75 ()) a Saecee 1. 67 Sie p14 325 al: (043) p135 9) MONO Tal eeeeee Birdy Bedseseee eres ‘ 60}. 2372] 1.2¢] 0.19 iB} 0 a 0. 37 ie 3. 23 7 50.0 | 1.3] 48.7 | 0.97| 188 Hern Island Bed..-...... 39| 1805|1.0¢) 0.34] 615]. 0.200) 3.62] 2215} 0.50] 0.16 369) 23.0 | 1.7] 21.3| 0.92! 178 417 | 0.26} 107 2.22 | 238 | 0.39 91 | ParkerisiBed eeeeeee sae 22 | 154 | 1.2 | 0.99] 153 | 0.40 | 5.85] -895 |2.0 | 0.33) 296 | 14.2 | 3.6] 10.6) 0.74) 120 BrigeBoddaceeeteee peer reer | 23] 166 | 2.3 | 0.57 89 | 0.20 1.07 95 | 0.2 | 0. 52 50) | 77.0) | 7.7 || 69)| 077) — 120 By referring to Tabie I it wil] be seen that on all the beds in Tangier Sound, from Fishing Bay down to the Great Rock, with one exception, that of Chain Shoal, the maximum ratio is that of the second class to the first. The inference is that there was a successful spatting season on all the upper beds in 1876 or 1877, probably the former. Again, the minimum ratio, as far down the Sound as the Mud Bed, is that of the third class to the second, showing that on the beds above the Mud Bed there was not a successful attachment in 1878, which was the case as attested by ourselves. The remaining ratios on these beds show that there has been some attachment during the present season. Leaving the Chain Shoal Bed for the present, the minimum ratio on all the remaining beds is that of the fourth class to the third, showing that there has been but little attachment of young during the season of 1879. The remaining ratios show that there was a partial attachment of young on the beds between Turtle Egg Island Bed and the Great Rock during 1878, and a partial attachment on the remaining beds north of Jane’s Island during 1876 or 1877, while there was a successful spatting on those lower beds during 1878, which conclusion was found to be correct by our observations during that season. Arranging these deductions in tabular form, we have the following: Table showing the success of spatting in different seasons— Tangier Sound. Section No. 1. Section No. 2. Section No. 3. Year. ; | eee RCS s 17F Seer : wage a Upper Tangier beds down | Middle Tangier, TurtleEgg | Lower Tangier, below to Mud Rock. Island, to Great Rock. Jane’s Island. * IVA Oen tsi asagasuda ns sudabacaAssoeceDAnaenecssas6E- | Successful passes eee eeeee ee MiSuccessiuleess a eee eee Moderately successful. a: 4: Seeaety Seed Niece cae) Se Che. Reet Te ens | Unsuccessful eer eeneeeesee | Moderately successful Successful. 1879.2 2S Sho) Se hs ee EE Ler Bee ee Peres | Moderately successful. ..-..- | lUmsuccesstul@eeeeeeee cree | Unsuccessful. The Chain Shoal differs from the beds of its section, the upper, in having its successful spat- ting season in 1878, and its moderately successful one in 1876 or 1877, while during the last season there has been but a small attachment; it thus assimilates itself to Section 3. If Tab'e I is again referred to for the Pocomoke beds, it will be found by assembling the upper 63 beds under one head and considering the Bird and Hern Island Beds to be, what they practically are, one bed, we have a table for Pocomoke, as follows: Table showing the success of spatting in different seasons—Pocomoke Sound. Bird and Hern Island Parker’s and Brig Beds. Year. Upper Pocomoke. Muddy Marsh. Beds WO OP Wilocacasdacoaaass facie see eeeysue Waa naan Unsuccessful ----...- iWnsuccesstulleeee- eer Unsuccessful -.--..... Moderately successful. NST Be partes Scie eeieies cee selects nae e ee sereteias Successtul.- =. 22-522. Moderately successful.| Successful ..-...-...-. | Successful. TRY Catia de SUAS a eee SS a Moderately successful. Successful ......-..--- Moderately successful.) Unsuccessful. With regard to these tables, it must be remembered that the suecess or want of it is only by comparison with previous years, nor does it necessarily mean that there has been even a moderate attachment, but only that one year was better than another. By combining the first and second classes and third and fourth on each bed, and combining such beds as are similarly situated and contiguous, I-have arranged the following table for com. parison with the similar one of the dredging results on the beds in the bay: TABLE IIl.—Dredging results—Tangier and Pocomoke Sounds. | : = | | Oysters. | : Oysters. = Tei eal Vous (Sane Sail ee Sale Name of bed. & Z & Z Ratio. Name of bed. 2 | & A | Ratio. ga | &8 ga | aa | | = ° Cid | ns ° ied | [eae A D de a =| | J a oe S| | Ei a a ie 7 | ine Pret |e 7 mB vi Sea Reae Pa eR al SharkespiGin wets cesar eee see a eaae 871 | 871 | I O))) Demers skis oe Soeéoacostdesosdese Reusnse 934 | 3,980} 4.26 LWICLORE, OlGS =e eae mae asta see ee ek eels | 651 383 | , GEN] Ggreps GG sc sacssencooseeecasboanacooaases> | 4,073 | 12, 209 3.00 a =] |—— | 1,522! 1,254 0. 82 5,007 | 16,189 | 3.23 TRATES JV un sod ceoebencouvcuecesascoedean 250 88 O835)lavomanrspMarshee esses eae aes aer res 1,820 | 3,176] 1.74 WOMENS. WHR ooscoaecosecaasec Of RS Vases 31) 47 | 1.51|| Little Thoroughfare .....--2-2.-:.22---.--| 272 | 1, 048 | 3. 85 281 135 | 0.48 | Great Rhoroughtare saa- Peseta 668 | 5,493) 8.22 | H sesonee |i) Obibigm mes IEG scodacsadevossesocecceoaces ; 1,283] 1,852 1.44 : cone | | {| | Drumming Shoal .......-..-.-------------.| 2,105 | 1,909 eat 0. 90 TOhIS On Se Od ewe ee tee eee | 93 125 | 1.34 t 5 9 25 | —_—| Cowan's alt Perea aae as 222 iecmar eee etal 85 23 0. 25 2,316 8,518 | 3. 67 Grassphanoierere ey ae seeee ee aes teeta e 937 | 1, 140 1.21 t lass Marte oo lslandigecs oe =. = ao W275) e2189)| | ey 7il') DOS Bush Bede ae yor eee BS |) 200) OW TYROL RSG ec el aie a Ae ed sat PSH | cj 80 i AGRE ee a eR ano are se aca ae a OD 85) O82 IMiuSGlORETolole: see aeepey NORE eekd 2 BuOzBH | MONTDOmtatd oN EDn oso) od se ets eo ber riceet edad 44 Bs ae ——— ——_—_ Naf ULISen Wasa cdacocdae Seecen cose mease Bence 125 39 0. 31 8,326 | 12,340) 1.48 timtess (ex = x | eS 607 398 0. 65 Chain Shoal ...--- Sele SAE ee eo 689 | 2,340 3. 41 || gach ots IPinevalslandsbareessasee eee eee eee 5, 132 | 13, 927 2.71 SUNG) MUEIS)N coposes -cesb26Fe ust acbagtens wwe he lhe Ow 5, 821 | 16, 267 2.79 Jean ISG noo n6 dosaebe acasosbo04 eeeacodsaeA 283 72 0. 25 | lethedeee legos asks vernls andi edie ees ease eae eee aee 241 257 1.07 Mano kin ivy OL ee eee eee serene Tae | 2,163 3, 327 51 | iy BR ey Se AR ier lado aici 1 Ge OG Rs oot ema ate eaten 524 329 0. 62 Ji INNGWICERER. Gosacceaseuenseksosumecsce 1,913 | 3, 751 LOG} |e MARLEEN eR R MRR TA ORC m Ae Mc mR REI aw Mit) Tes REE yh Po tl teie\=\nyesie [Peet Wiese IPC Bamlcers Red ajec tse aye ee 307 | 1,191 3.87 sHiapris Bede o ee eerie een ae AyD a veh o/h ||| Setting ton lead ie A a ae 257 145 0.56 Stompin Spas oo ccc tdcemootossecassuoosec 1,392 | 3,402 2. 44 The ratios underlined thus ( saobabo J are the only ones considered, and show the ratio of young growth to mature oysters in each locality. 5 I find the ratio of young growth to mature oysters to be, generally speaking, a constantly Increasing one from the head of Tangier Sound to the last section. In my report of the investigation carried on in 1878, I called attention to the noticeable absence of “young” on the beds above Piney Island Bar and Kedge’s Strait, and to the large attachment on the southern beds, and the ratios in Table IL begin increasing materially on those beds where there was a successful attachment of young during the previous season. Referring to the ““Spatting Table,” it will be seen that on the upper section there has not been a successful attachment since 1876~77; hence, the mature oysters from two to three years old, the 64 growth of those seasons, should be in the ascendant naturally, and hence the small ratios on the upper section. Apparently the ratios should be about the same on the middle section, as its successive spat- ting season was also in 187677; but the moderately successful season was in 1878, while on the upper section it was in 1879; and as brood oysters are constantly taken from the beds in constantly increasing numbers it follows that the yield of each succeeding year will be less. As an addi- tional cause, more of the beds in the upper section are worked during the summer than in the others. During the season of 1878 there was an extraordinary growth of young on Harris’ bed, which accounts for its large ratio, and the increase of the other ratios over those of the first section is due to some extent to the attachment of the season of 1878. On the lower section the ratios are very large by reason of the successful attachment in 1878, and the but moderate success of the seasons of 187677. The variations in the ratios can thus be accounted for by the success or failure of different spatting seasons, and no doubt this success or failure has its influence, but that its effects are not invariable can be seen by reference to the ratios of Pocomoke Sound. With the exception of Parker’s Bed, a small bed lying near Watt’s Island and which has not been dredged as extensively as the others in Pocomoke Sound, we find the ratio of young growth to mature oysters exceedingly small. In no ease do the former predominate. From this, accord- ing to the deductions from the Tangier beds, it would be inferred that the seasons of 1876 or 1877 were unusually successful ones for the attachment of the spat, and that subsequently there has been no successful season. By referring to the spatting table we find, however, that the spatting season of 1876 or 1877 was on the whole unsuccessful, and the seasons subsequent have either been successful or moder- ately so, and this conclusion is supported by our observations during 1878. But as the success or non-success as shown by the spatting table is comparative only, we can only assume that whether successful or not the attachment was not sufficient as one explanation of the small ratios found in Pocomoke. Consequently the variation in the success of different spatting seasons is not sufficient to explain unusual and abnormal changes in the ratios of the young growth to the mature oyster. It is evident that the removal of a large number of mature oysters from a bed would show apparently an increased fecundity, by increasing the ratio of young growth to mature oysters, and this apparent increase would be observable for at least two years, or until the young growth becaine in turn mature, when, as the reproduction would naturally be diminished by the removal of the brood oysters and consequently there would be a smaller number of young growth, and as the young growth of the previous year would be in that time mature, the ratio would suddenly turn in the opposite way, and be as abnormally small as it had been abnormally large. Once having taken this turn, and the fishing still continuing, the ratios would constantly decrease. A few fluctuations might occur now and then, but the general tendency would be a diminishing one. Nature arranges her own laws of supply and demand, and the ratios she establishes between the different classes in any community are most likely to be the necessary ones, and such are the only ones that can be accepted as standards. We have established that upon the unworked beds in the Bay the ratio of young growth to mature oysters is about 1.5, but as this is the result of but one season’s observations, and those over a somewhat limited area, it would be rash to accept that standard exactly or to draw rigid inferences from comparison with it. Therefore, in order to allow a sufficient margin for the variations of different seasons and localities, it will be better to consider the normal ratio as between 1 and 2, and consequently any increase or decrease of that ratio will be an indication of diminished fecundity, and, all things remaining the same, the eventual destruction of the beds. Comparing the ratios of the beds in the Sounds with that established as a standard, we find that— 1st. All beds above the Grass Tangier fall below the minimum ratio. 2d. That the groups including Tangier Grass and Muscle Hole are within the limit, as are the beds in the Manokin and Big Annemessex Rivers and the Woman’s Marsh Bed. 65 3d. That all other groups exceed the maximum ratio. 4th. That all beds in Pocomoke, with the exception of Parker’s Bed, are below in minimum. Instituting another comparison, that of the percentage of débris to the total amount brought up, we find that, with the exception of Drumming Shoal, Harris’ and Jane’s Island Beds, the per- centage constantly increases to the southward, and that in Pocomoke it is larger than elsewhere, and larger on the Muddy Marsh and Bird Beds than on any others. A coincidence will here be noticed in the increased ratios in lower Tangier and the increased percentage of débris, and in Pocomoke in the small ratios and very large percentage of débris. Table showing number of oysters to the square yard. TANGIER SOUND. | | Number of hauls of dredge. | Name of bed. | 1878. 1879. Differences. 1878. | 1879. | | | | Horsey’s Bar.......------------+2+220 222222 cere ese eece ee eee ene sees eee estes esses eee] | (Tal Foepasbe (Pe cosonconooe ABSIGHS TBC ceo ncc vocdoo coo ss eacapsesssacceDds ce erecrenoicoossaabe dnaceaboacsabdsssodsrone sdeacesasccsce | WW eeécenne OBR) |Kasscenccons TVR ING. « ocinon ca pbcbaw Goosen uueLe or peo ee Gees IOS RET CEE Oren eee gape em ree | | 50 | 1.254 0.840 | —. 414 ; SHaGHHCE ING. sea ceebs Ce oS aR Eanes Bae e Ee EH SEO E ECC So LCoS TRE AEE aEceTote aaer Beg oOr IOS R ae Eceel Arenas 80 | 1.014 | 0.328 | —. 686 IDRPATANAS SION sacodscssesdooessesesdaconososcccasadae ae ocaocussssacscuscsucdHaEsta0050eba0Rclpesesoas Off |iacdoanes 0.994 |-.---...-... WEG CRESS. 1 ogsocependdousacds acesoenasocans seaqdoac0c0Ren bs spaguonoaacodDESapandqconassa4 10 100 1.064) 9.872 —. 692 AUS Wee TIENT Coss cca ooos soc ccoonoucacoedeRds posters papsuSsodcedescdscudsuddoad sAB0Sse02000n 13 55 | 0.3882 0.295 —. 087 Whiitl eG SoseaseoasypoudPacaoubeda 5 bS5earn dons S DES onesS S>obDO ner rOR ASP RATenEasHecssHaa SSeOsp anor BParseed| 52) 0.642 | 0.515 —, 127 Ginein SIGHT Jase Ue ase seeds aaige eeoce Oce aan tea ere eae eines fen ae ce Ieceoes | 41 1.589 0.249 —. 296 Piney Ua eynGl BNP ssosdeeseqoe dcocesesdeosdaccscasobbods aousacensenne nuenandoosbeseecosenacusese 49 198 0.687 0.544 —. 143 WISONO JEL) s45e5 Scoocebssses OMe BORE Es SEAR a SED Dich MAE pee Be Le SES eres Aa Ee tee 36 | 87 | 0.826! 0.746 —. 080 Mano king Riv olsen eee rer cee iecis sentinel ie cie in cteatsiste sent sfaleletesteia iste ste reie ete stereisictaieieineisiele 25 90 0.134, 0.320 +. 186 JES JN NGNGEISERS IRIE cass ce nedkes aqosc0 conaanaonabecas ces cotbaacsucesooouaesoocogseascebbe5ne 7 41 0.560 0. 665 +. 105 Jelbyooky? Jat le ZSCecaeSaeeneeLeOcmea abe bat eae noes Caan wae AOS Co SSeS HRB nen Meee eC Se eee eee 40 109 0.281 | 0.423 +. 142 stereo SAMMI) 535 2s conc as couosoadbdan sesso a0 206 bodaconudnadonuassaserascconsosuooHEnoanAadGE 12 51 | 0.271 | 0.423 +. 152 TOC IMIEING cases agonrcasssseaeopeceds SaocOks BO USES Sa BSS REE ORnES at ee SSeReqas Set eEe pera ae Meer ees 140 eee ORO W On| eets-= ae AOE ERS cose SaAGOC oe ee oS O Mae a ree eT CIEE met 1 te ina ees EE ie en ene 32 110 0.240 | Q. 125 —.115 (Gne atyB Cater esis aeons So = cei eae esa sees em aude er Soci Seam me emasee e eee Stee 36 151 0.165 | 0.265 +. 100 eipilopbhorouchtate ress reese y= se eee ene metas sce seen -recuniee ance weam nega cna esque sa | 9 35 0.145) 0.104 —. 040 (Carey TUAW ESE) Soscoos ssa ce sasosE soo benese sate cesaaes> a aero oR UOUbB eS Ese Heb eoseHeBH tuoseeor 104 32 0.115 0.236 +..121 (CEO ath he sc aantdaosecuen co pScOnndone OU RsoEhe baie Chea oS ORs ede oo a Bon HaEaaee ce te aee a ere See 36 79 | 0.212'| 0.261 +L. 049 POHNSONS Presa se a eAee aces ter oc las aS ae es om ise etrsacignes SRSo dS Ao emaobepAosnsoeescer[r 4 17 0.187 (0. 074 —.113 POCOMOKE SOUND. 2 r stl aoe —— x WpperiPocomokesBedsyses eee eee see od es ee eee oer eee aise eee eiseiab sista cmon s|beaeoeeq| TO EGecopee | 0.189 ]..----.---. IEG Vly IMP 3a sueaue dAeBaASUS ue IRSA Se AB ROEN a Gee sae crane are diese ee ee nal 3 20 | 0.405 | 0.070 | —. 335 IInd eRe dee ROCEy ee faek Stee ane 2 a eEORs eee ROSE MEDD DEY Were Fah TES TUTE TE YOUR See | 4 58 | 9.360) 0.124 | —. 236 Hernelis angen cdiver anaes seas eee teeter cis 2) sec CPP EEE Yt eee ac ani eee aaain tt seiner. | 6 39 | 0.294 0.110 | —. 184 Por ere) Bed a aeener eee oR eee ei eee ee ol Lite wiles aie ab etl ree ae Mamet As, 21 | 0.573 | 0.303 | —.270 SE foe TESA ecb ss cin stu a ka ee la ee eA Da a tc | 23 | 0.269) 0.154 | —.115 The number of oysters to the square yard ascertained, as described in my report of the inves- tigation of 1878, has been calculated for each bed, and the results tabulated, together with those of the previous season, for convenience of comparison. Though a standard has been established by the number found on the unworked beds in the bay, no comparison, except in one way, is just, the conditions of bottom and difference of growth upon the worked and unworked beds differing so materially. The number on any bed, obtained by the method we have used, will always be much less than what is really the case, but they will be much less true on an unworked bed than upon one which has been for some time subjected to dredging influences, and where the bottom is soft and yielding, and the oysters grow singly or in small clusters instead of being cemented together and to the surface stratum, as they are on the undredged beds. Therefore, any number obtained from a bed which has been worked should be larger than that obtained from an unworked App. 11——9 66 one. How much so it is impossible to say, but it is evident that a smaller number would indicate a failure of the mature oysters. In calculating these numbers only first and second class oysters have been considered. It will be seen by the table that on all the beds above Kedge’s Strait there has been a marked decrease in the number of oysters to the square yard. That on the remaining beds, with the excep- tion of Woman’s Marsh and Johnson’s beds, and considering the Thoroughfare beds as one, there has been an increase in the number of oysters. That on all the beds in Pocomoke Sound there has been a marked decrease. It will also be seen that on many of the beds the number falls below the standard of 0.4, that on none of them is it very much greater, and that, generally speaking, the numbers are less than the standard on those beds that show a gain upon the number established during 1878. It would appear, then, by one comparison, that most of the beds have not a sufficient number of mature oysters upon them; and by the other, that however many were taken off, yet nature could more than supply the demand. These inconsistent results may be the result of several causes. The standard may be too high; but, as has been explained, if the beds are in equally good condition, the probability is that the dredge would bring up a larger number from the old than from the new beds. The smallness of the numbers on the lower beds may be due to the greater depth of water and hardness of the bottom, though they do not differ greatly in that respect from the beds in the bay, however much from those in the northern part of the Sound. It would not be wise to decide hastily, upon the evidence of the numbers to the square yard, that the beds are either deteriorating or the reverse, especially as the comparison has been of but two seasons. If, after they have been continued for some time, there should be an increased number shown, it may be considered differently; but, as all experience testifies to the deterioration of the beds, the inconsistency of the results shown by the table can probably be explained in another way than by assuming the standard number to be too great, and this explanation will be subsequently attempted. INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM ‘SPA'T COLLECTORS.” In order to ascertain when the first attachment of young took place on each bed, the compara- tive extent of such attachment, the influence of bottom and depth of water upon the attachment, and, finally, the increase in size of the oyster and the number surviving each period of their exist- ence, I placed early in July-twenty-four spat collectors on the beds in the Sounds; but I regret to say that the collectors were removed by some ill-disposed persons almost as soon as placed. The last hurdle, as the bundle of tiles was called, was in position on July 14, and on July 15 only four remained in position, and after the Ist of August there was but one left (No. 7, in the Big Annemessex River). The hurdles were composed of eight or sixteen half-round tiles, lashed on a wooden, frame, and so arranged that the frame rested on the bottom, the tiles being thus raised about six inches above the bottom. The tiles were ordinary earthenware ones, unglazed, and were always placed so as to have their concave side underneath. As long as the hurdles remained in position they were fre- quently examined in order to ascertain the advent of the young brood, and from those examina- tions I am of the opinion that the first attachment of oysters took place about July 17, as on that day we discovered, with the aid of the microscope, oysters on Hurdle No. 12, on Chain Shoal, and on the 19th, in the same way, found them on No. 7,in the Big Annemessex. On July 24 they were observable on the hurdles on the Great Rock, both in shoal and deep water. Though the attach- ment probably began about the middle of July, yet it was only evident on the tiles, as our dredging operations did not discover any attachment before the 12th of August, when the young brood were found in moderate numbers on all the beds in both the Sounds. The number found in Pocomoke Sound was much smaller than in Tangier, and the number on the Upper Pocomoke beds and on the Muddy Marsh bed was smaller than on the lower ones. The attachment appears to be proportional to the number of oysters, such beds as the Muddy Marsh, for instance, having very few young; but as the bed is badly broken up, this may be owing to the absence of proper cultch. The young appear to select the cleanest and smoothest shells for attachment, and we always found that the ‘‘ boxes,” or those shells which had not been separated 67 completely, contained the largest number of young brood. We also found that the size of the young depended, to a great extent, upon the depth of water. Those first detected by us were from two millimeters to one centimeter in length, and as the shoal-water oysters spawn first, and as we found the young of the largest size in shoal water, I infer that the attachment of the oyster occurs very near the location of the parent. The hurdle in the Big Annemessex was subjected to four examinations. It was placed in position on July 9, and on July 19, when the first examination was made, there were a few oysters on the tiles, but so small that a microscope was necessary in order to recognize them. The second examination was on August 2, and the oysters were then quite perceptible and easily counted. The total number of oysters on the tiles was then 1,506; deducting those on tile No. 7, which tile was removed, there were 1,177. The number on a tile varied greatly, the max- imum being 348 and the minimum 26. The third examination was on the 23d of August. The oysters had increased very much in size and in numbers. The total number on the tiles was now 1,334, showing an increase of 0.13 per cent. of the number at the second examination. The number on the lower side of the tiles was much larger than on the upper. A tile (No. 2) was removed, and, deducting the number of oysters on it from the sum, there were 1,202 still on the hurdle. A few oysters were injured, prob- ably by raising or lowering the hurdle from and to the bottom. The fourth examination was on the 10th of October. The total number of oysters was then 539, showing a decrease of 55 per cent. At this examination about two-thirds of the oysters were of the third class, or over three-quarters of an inch in length, and two of them were over two inches long, being thus of the second class. All, however, could be distinguished as of very recent growth, being very long and thin, with thin, delicate shells, easily broken with the thumb-nail or point of a penknife. The largest numbers were still found on the lower sides of the tiles. A moderate number of oysters had been injured by rough handling. I infer from the four inspections made of this hurdle, and from the one or two made of others before they were removed, that the first attachment of young began, as I have said, about the middle of July, and continued until about the 20th of August, as op the 23d of that month there was no indication of any recent attachment. Probably it reaches its maximum number about the end of July, and decreases afterwards. The mortality after the 23d of August was very great, fully 50 per cent. perishing from some unknown cause, which, though unknown, is certainly nat- ural. We did not notice any evidence of the destructive effects of drills or other animals, though their agency would only be discovered by the evidence of the holes in the upper valves, but as those valves were never present, it cannot be said with certainty that the destruction was not due to them. Whatever the cause, the fact is that 50 per cent. perished in the first six weeks of their existence. . The tiles have shown that the increase in size is much greater than was supposed, and are the first and only authentie evidence upon that point which has been produced with regard to the American oyster. Again, it is conclusively shown by these tiles and some others that were dredged up from the Woman’s Marsh beds (Hurdle No. 24), that the greatest attachment is on the lower con- cave side, and consequently that whatever may be the movements of the embryo oyster before attachment, during the period just prior to it they are near, if not on the bottom, and in seeking their place of attachment they must rise. In this they are similar to the European variety. The selection of the lower sides of the tiles and the interior of the “boxes” may be an effort of nature to provide some protection for the voung brood, by, to a certain extent, inducing them to seek dark and secluded points for attachment, or the large number found in- such places may be due to the inability of the various enemies of the spat to get at them when thus protected. It is a matter of very great regret that we have not a large number of specimens and obser- vations for comparison, as all the future investigations in this field would be greatly assisted by an accurate knowledge of the rate of decrease in number and increase in size of the oysters, and it is to be hoped that the hurdle in the Big Annemessex will be allowed to remain in position long enough to permit the meager, yet valuable, information it can produce to be made public. 68 INVESTIGATION OF TEMPERATURES. It was intended that a self-registering thermometer should be placed on each hurdle, and that the temperature to which the young were exposed should be noted at each examination. Fortu- nately, considering the fate of the hurdles, the thermometers were not received in time to be used as was intended, and after the disappearance of the spat collectors it was not considered advisable to expose the thermometers to the same risks.- About the last of July, however, I had the tem- perature of the surface water recorded every two hours, and considering that there is probably but little variation in the limits of the Sounds, I have plotted the accompanying curve of maxi- mum and minimum temperatures from July 29 to October 1. It will be seen that these curves are very irregular, and that the greatest irregularities occur during the month of August, and that the greatest difference is between the 6th and 10th of August, one of 15° in four days. On the 15th there is a change of 8°, and on the 28th of 12°. About the 4th of August I determined to utilize the channel buoys as marks for the positions of thermometers, hoping that they might thus escape the observation of those who were inclined toremove them. Accordingly, we placed four self-registering thermometers on the beds; one at the foot of the buoy on the Shark’s Fin, one on the buoy on Piney Island Bar, one on the buoy off Watts’ Island light-house, and one on the buoy off Syke’s Island, about the middle of Pocomoke Sound. We were enabled to make several examinations of these thermometers; but about the Ist of September, finding that one had been stolen, I concluded to remove the others before they shared the same fate. The curves of maximum and minimum temperature given by these thermometers, and also the range of variation, are Shown on the same sheet with the curves of surface temperature. The thermometers were in place too late, and for too short a period, to allow any safe conclu- sions to be based upon the information given by them; but it is noticeable, as an interesting coinci- dence, that the curves of both surface and bottom temperatures show the greatest variations about the time when the young were what is known as “spat,” or during the period of and just before attachment; the young on the shoal beds presumably attaching by early August, and those on the deep water or southern beds somewhat later. I regret that it was impossible for me to more thor- oughly study the effects of the change of temperature, as I think the failure or success of the Spatting, other things being equal, will be found to depend mainly upon the temperature to which the mature oyster and embryos are exposed during the spawning season. INVESTIGATION OF THE CHANGES IN DENSITY OF THE WATER. In order to have definite information as to the change of density of the water surrounding the oysters, and regarding such changes during the spatting season as of most importance, and as the maximum change would be most likely to occur about the time of the spring tides, I determined to obtain specimens of water on a certain number of sections across each Sound at high and low water of the spring tides. The sections were located as follows, and are shown on the sketches accompanying this report: Section No. 1 was just above Hooper’s Strait and at the mouths of the Nanticoke and Wicom- ico Rivers, in order that the influence of both the strait and rivers might be shown. Section No. 2, for the same reason, was north of Kedge’s Strait and across the mouths of the Manokin and Big Annemessex Rivers. Section No. 3 was across the entrance of both Sounds, south of Watts’ Island. Section No. 4 was across the middle of Pocomoke Sound, that the influence of Guilford and Mesongo Creeks might be known. i Section No. 5 was above the natural beds of Pocomoke Sound and across the mouth of Poco- moke River. Stations were selected on these sections in such a manner as to obtain specimens of the water that passed over the beds, and the specimens were taken by means of the drop-water cylinders at every two fathoms of depth. As soon as possible after securing them they were tested with the hydrometer. The results are tabulated in the “record of densities,” and curves showing the various changes accompany this report. All densities are reduced to a standard temperature of 60° Fahr., and 1,000 represents the density of distilled water. 69 In studying these curves, it must be remembered that only their variations are of particular importance. The absolute density is not so much so, except for comparison with that of other localities; but the variations are important if by them we can account for the failure either of the propagation or attachment of the young oysters. ‘The curves will show certain irregularities, due to either the variations in depth, or to the tides having changed from flood to ebb, or the reverse, on one side of the Sound at a time differing from that on the other. As will be seen, however, the greatest variations in each month are in Tangier Sound, on the eastern side, where the influence of the rivers is felt to greatest extent. In Pocomoke Sound the greatest variations appear to be on the western side, and I assign as a reason for this that the influence of Guilford and Mesongo Creeks is of small importance compared with that of the Poco- moke River, the current from which sweeps along the northern and western parts of the Sound. The curves show that the variation is very slight, except on the September sections. The second series of curves, those showing the monthly change of mean densities, indicate that the maximum change on each section was about the 1st of September; that the variations in Poco- moke Sound were much greater than in Tangier Sound; and that the maximum changes were at the head of each Sound, and the variations diminished towards the entrances. The third series of curves shows the same when all the observations in each Sound are assem- bled, but with this difference—while the density in Tangier Sound was greater on October Ist than at any other time, in Pocomoke Sound the influence of the river was still felt; and notwithstanding the diminished temperature the density on the Ist of October was less than on the Ist of August. The fourth series of curves shows the difference in density between the upper and lower sec- tions in Tangier and Pocomoke Sounds in each month, and indicates that the density of the water is considerably greater over the lower beds thau on the upper. The maximum density found during the summer was on section 3, in October, and was 1 0166. The minimum density was found in section 5, in September, and was 1.0005. By referring to the curves showing monthly changes of mean densities, it will be seen that in only one case, that of section 5, does the density become less than 1.0100, and that even on this section it is evident that this was not the normal condition of the water. There were heavy freshets in the Pocomoke River during the latter part of August and during September, which accounts - for the slight density as shown by the curves. Mr. Barroll was informed by the inhabitants of the vicinity of the mouth of Pocomoke River that these freshets had killed large numbers of oysters, both on the natural and plauted beds. An inspection of the other curves shows that the variation of density on successive tides was not much greater on this section than on the others, and as the oysters elsewhere in the Sounds did not appear to suffer from the effects of these variations, I am of the opinion that the fluctuation was not sufficient to affect the mature animal, but that in this case the water continued fresh, or practically so, for too long a period, thus killing the oysters by endosmose. From the observations of density, then, it may be assumed that the density of the water, in these localities at least, cannot fall below 1.01 for any protracted period without destroying the oysters. Whether the changes in density affect the spatting can only be ascertained by continu- ing the observations for a number of seasons, or by direct experiment with the spat artificially raised. INCIDENTAL INFORMATION. During the summer I have examined, under the microscope, 374 oysters, of which 212 were females and 162 males, or the percentage of females was 0.56. The oysters were not all examined at the same time, nor were they all from the same bed, but the percentage in each of the lots examined, twelve in number, does not vary greatly from the percentage given above. I am of the opinion, therefore, that about 60 per cent. of the oysters in a community are females. A larger number of observations is, however, desirable. In making these examinations I have never seen both ova and spermatozoa in the same animal, though I have made many careful observations in order to detect the presence of either. I have also carefully examined the gills and mantles of a large number, and have never found an embryo oyster within the shell; and as these observations were made during the spawning season, I do 70 not think it possible that the spat, if they are at any time contained within the gills or mantle, could have escaped my notice. The observations as to the sex of the oyster were continued late in the season, and though the ova and spermatozoa in a number of oysters were in apparently good condition as late as the 1st of October, yet those products of generation appeared in best condition in the largest number of animals during July, and a considerable disintegration of the eggs was noticed by the end of that month. As far as I could ascertain, the condition of both ova and spermatozoa depended upon the depth of water, though the rule was not invariable. The generative products of the deep-water oysters reached a state most favorable for reproduction several weeks after the same had occurred in the shoal water; and, in general terms, neither ova nor spermatozoa in most of the oysters, in either deep or shoal water, after the middle of August, was in a state favorable for fertilization. Large numbers of oysters in all depths passed through the spawning season without expelling the con- tents of the generative organs. I found this the case especially on the beds on the western side of Tangier Sound, above Kedge’s Strait, where, on the Sth and 9th of October, we found many oysters fattening with the generative matter unexpelled. I was informed that this was not unu- sual, and that it injured the oyster for marketable purposes. As late as the 8th I found oysters with the generative matter in good condition, and on the 7th of October I succeeded in securing from oysters taken from Kedge’s Strait a sufficient amount of ova and spermatozoa to make experi- ments in artificial impregnation, and was successful in producing one embryo oyster. Probably had I used greater care a larger number would have resulted. During the season of 1878 we observed large numbers of astyris in the shells of the mature oysters and attached to those of the young. In many cases they were found in the holes which had been bored in the shells of the latter. As we could not find any known enemy of the oyster in sufficient numbers to account for the evident damage done, and as so many circumstances pointed to astyris as the cause, I concluded that the boring must be done by that animal, and alluded to it in my previous report. The specimens preserved were described by Mr. W. H. Dall, and the description appended to that report. During the past summer we have found a much larger number of the rough welks (wrosalpinx cinereus) than during the previous season, and though they were not found in as large numbers as the astyris, yet their presence inclined me to question the conclusions arrived at during the season of 1878. I accordingly collected a large number of astyris and placed them in an aquarium jar with a number of young oysters, changing the water constantly and inspecting the animals frequently. The observations were continued for over a week, and at the end of that time both oysters and astyris were alive, but there was no evidence of any boring, nor did any inspection show an inclination in that direction upon the part of the astyris; on the contrary, they soon left the shells and went to the bottom of the jar. I then collected a number of wrosalpinx cinereus and subjected them to the same test. At the end of four days one oyster had been bored and one welk was found at work on the shell of another. The rough welk is known to do great injury to the oyster in Long Island Sound, and the destruc- tion of the young, alluded to in my previous report as due to the drills, may be effected by this animal. That large numbers are destroyed by the welks cannot be doubted; but as it is possible that the astyris may also assist in this destruction, a more extended investigation ot this question than I was enabled to make is desirable. An analysis of several specimens of the water of the Sound and bay, by Prof. C. E. Monroe, of the Naval Academy, is appended to this report for use in comparing the localities investigated with others whose investigation may be subsequently attempted. The specimens have been selected from those taken on different stages of the tide and from different sections. The only noticeable change on the beds this season was that the amount of red sponge appeared to be uch less than in 1878. In other respects they are, to outward appearances, in a similar state, though the dredgers report them as uch broken up and with an increased amount of débris. INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM ‘‘RECORD OF STATISTICS.” The member of the party on duty at Crisfield inspected, during the season, 496 vessels directly engaged in the oyster fishery, and the results of these inspections have been recorded in the record of statistics, which record, to a great extent, explains itself. 71 2 Owing to the large number of vessels dredging, it was frequently impossible to visit and inspect all that entered during the day. When such was the case, those inspected were selected from dif- ferent classes and from different dredging grounds that a fair idea might be obtained of the num- ber of oysters removed each day from each bed. The method of examination was as follows: The total number of bushels in the load given by the master of the vessel was recorded, with the number of hours of labor necessary to obtain that quantity, and other matters of statistical interest. Several samples of one-quarter or one-half bushel each were then selected from different parts of the load and the number of oysters of each class in each sample counted and recorded. The number of samples examined depended upon the number of bushels in the load and upon the character of the oysters, a large number being taken when the oysters appeared dissimilar, and when the quantity was great. At least three samples were usually examined. In most cases the average number of each class per sample was nearly the same as that given by each examination, and, consequently, it is assumed that a close estimate of the number of each class in the entire load was obtained by multiplying the number of each class in a bushel, as shown by the samples, by the total number of bushels in the load. From the record of these inspections I have been able to determine with practical accuracy the number of oysters of the several classes removed from the various beds by each description of dredging vessel. After September 1, when the dredging began, we counted each day all the vessels in sight from the “ Palinurus,” specifying the size and the ground upon which they were working, and the masters of the dredging vessels were also requested to note the number of dredgers working in their vicinity, which they in many cases very obligingly did. As even with these data, the number of working days given on each bed is very small, and because no bed is dredged continuously dur- ing the season, but at intervals, I have divided the sections in a similar manner to that described in my previous report. The first section includes the beds north of Piney Island Bar and the Muscle Hole; the sec- ond section, those from the Muscle Hole and Piney Island Bar to the Great Rock; the third sec- tion, the remaining beds in Tangier Sound; and the fourth section, all the Pocomoke beds. By this arrangement duplication of the vessels counted is prevented and the average number of vessels working each day is more nearly a correct estimate. The vessels dredging on these several sections, as counted by ourselves and by their masters, have been assembled; the number of oysters assigned to each class of vessel working in the section has then been multiplied by the number of vessels of each class, and the total number of oysters taken off the beds in each section thus obtained. The number of oysters taken by any vessel in a day varies greatly, owing to the weather principally, but in assigning the quantity on each day, the number brought in by vessels of the same class, as shown by “record of statistics,” has been used, as a more correct estimate is thus assured than would be given by using tbe average for the whole season. The following table has been compiled from the calculations, and shows the num- ber of. oysters taken from each section in a specified number of days; supposing the observations to have extended over a sufficient period, the number of oysters has been divided by the number of days, and the average number removed in each day thus obtained. Table showing estimated number of oysters removed in 1879. SECTION 1—UPPER TANGIER SOUND. | i D 3 Dn & a. iamiton Oe cen DS A Ser iS 2 ich Number of sail. 3 | S) a a & ~ & z = bai] D S =) 3 Pao = 3 a i) =O leat DN a x al Total number of oysters removed in 12 days....--./.------ leByab2lesailvessereet nee | 2, 322, 200 | 1, 934, 200 | 1,382,500 | 371, 000 | 8, 100 INN ELAS JU OOC ON Scie cobecouecsadeos sodpaa dos ceceoaeeosDeErda aseeETers HoBeSaaeaeease 192,683 | 161, 183 115, 200 30, 916 Total first and second classes TWOP Cy cease teneciccee NES on eae ame acl ara 353, 866 72 Table showing estimated number of oysters removed in 1879—Continued. SECTION 2.—MIDDLE TANGIER SOUND. es Zz 2g a Z eae ne 22 x g is) Sz lez gin Number of sail. TS S 2 | a HO = c—] eo) Troe % S 5 | | ZaS | 3 a | o mom i Nn a & Total number of oysters removed in 17 days...----.------- By 634 sail..-...-=----- 2,463, 800 | 1,623,860 1,132,060 384, 220 6, 400 INS VENLE NCO OED fasaaee sonDoes SEE BeodUS Bd b+ Sek ocosbUaaeeoreclloocepancasesesacce ccoD- 144, 929 95, 521 66, 591 22, 600 Total first and second classes per day.....-.--.-.-.--|----------0- -s-20- eee ee | 240, 450 SEcTION 3.—LOWER TANGIER SOUND. Total number of oysters removed in 34 days.....--.--.---- By 95 1psaileeeceese eee 2,329,600 | 1,413°610 | 1, 407, 230 | 558, 900 3, 900 | INGOT [We Chriss coe oesEsaonebons esoces obeoos ebaciac cna seellouctoccabeos anbeencceoes 68, 223 | 41, 576 41,389 16, 438 | Total first and second classes per day,.---+...---22--)2--- 2-2-2 -scennm ee - 109, 799 | be! tes Eo. wall Mi oe ES £0 eed Oe eee SEcTION 4.—POCOMOKE SOUND. + | | Total number of oysters removed in 9 days...-.--.....---.) By 169 sail -.......-.- 256, 809 121, 103 | 88, 800 | 20, 108 2, 200 Average per day..----.------- SSE BERRA HSE etre mEn arate ages ae eciia es eS oeian ae 28, 534 | 13, 567 9,866 2; 234 | es SESS Total first and second classes per day ..-.--..--..--.---- sooessbaecasasnos soc 42,101 | Total number of oysters first and second classes removed in one day ....--..--.--------------- +------------------ 746, 226 It will be noticed that the number of dredging vessels increases on each succeeding section in Tangier Sound, but that the number taken by each sail, and the yield per day, decrease. Also, that the number of sail in Pocomoke Sound is much smaller than in any other section, and that the yield per day is also much smaller. The character of the bottom and the depth of the water mate- rially influence the yield of the beds, those in shoal water with soft bottoms allowing more frequent hauls of the dredges than those in deep water or on hard bottoms. But as the dredges used in deep water and on hard bottoms are usually much heavier, this inequality is overcome to some extent. Again, the large vessels take a greater proportion of the oysters than the small ones, and those large vessels usually work on the deep-water beds. Considering the different sizes of the vessels and the superiority of the crews of the larger ones, and the heavier dredges used by them, I am of the opinion that the disparity between the yields of the Upper and Lower Tangier Beds is greater than it should be. The beds of the Middle Section are, with the exception of Piney Island Bar, similar to those of the upper section; yet, with a larger number of vessels working, the yield of that section is less than the upper. These facts, I think, show that the beds in Lower Tangier Sound are less productive than those in the upper. The dredging in Pocomoke Sound was principally on the upper beds, and none was done as far as we could ascertain on either the Brig or Parker’s Beds. As the middle and upper beds in this Sound are very similar in character of bottom and depth of water to the middle and upper beds in Tangier Sound, it would be inferred that the yield per day in Pocomoke would be about the same. On the contrary, as shown by the table, it is absurdly small; and, considering its size, it is not astonishing that the beds have been to a great extent abandoned. Taking the number of oysters removed each day, and considering, for the reasons given in my previous report, the working season to be of 120 days, I have compiled the following table, in which is given the number of oysters removed from each section and from the Sounds in one day and in the season. I have also given the same estimated in 1878 for comparison. 73 Table showing the number of oysters removed. 1 : | In one day. In one season. | Numberoi young growth, Section. | =e ee SE | { | | 1878. 1879. 1878. | 1879. Perday. | In the season. ele Seis | ic | | | | | IOs ee aeeaceesacdases SOO SD OSCC RI SOME CED oe uaro ch ee AOB RS aAe ees | 567,450 | 353, 876 68,094,000 | 42, 465,120 146, 100 | 17, 532, 000 ENON 2 serena eee eine cmeiene Seal eielere creas Sra eisee siceaiac ietoctlonee sires | 878, 450 240, 450 45,414,000 | 28,854,000 | 89, 200 | 10, 704, 000 INIT Bodosoncnqces Dobaso Gecce OS So Dee non EROCOCOL EER AOdenSEoe aoe | 459,000 | 109, 799 55, 080,000 | 13, 175, 880 57, 800 6, 936, 000 IN OSA eosin. seisetereccinetsie ENE eee feta tae mrcialoe fate (oi atte aie ie seeistseaicio mie | 183, 650 42,101 | 16, 038, 000 | 5,052,120 12,100 1, 452, 000 ANIL GOCE doeenteescnee eee CaRO HANES soe one eRe eee eee /1, 538,550 | 746,226 | 184,626,000 89,547,120 325, 200 36, 624, 000 IBUShelseaseeeeeeeee Bae ljee hse a eGieg ashe Boeiv eee Pee oe Riese beds Ke | 7, 692 3, 232 923, 230 | 447, 735 | Two hundred oysters are allowed to a bushel. The estimated number of young removed from all sections in one day, in 1878, was about 1,240,000, or 148,800,000 in the course of the season. It will be seen by the table that about one hundred million more oysters were removed in 1878 than would be in 1879, and that about the same excess exists with regard to the young. Of the two estimates, that of 1879 is much more ac@urate, being based upon a larger number of observa- tions, more carefully and systematically made than was possible in 1878, but the disparity between the two is so great that the estimate of 1878 would appear valueless, could not some cause be assigned for a decrease in the number of oysters taken from the beds. This decrease, as may be easily seen, must be due to one or both of the following causes: Ist. The fertility of the beds remaining the same, the dredgers may not be as numerous. 2d. The number of dredgers remaining the same, the beds may be exhausted; or, becoming so, there would be a smaller number of oysters produced ; or, 3d. The number of dredgers may have decreased and the fertility of the beds may be greatly impaired. There are no statistics of the oyster fishery in the localities under consideration except those collected by myself, and I am consequently obliged to put a greater dependence upon them than they intrinsically merit. They are necessarily somewhat rude, but, in the absence of other informa- tion, they can be used as giving some indication of the probable progress of the fishery in the two seasons under consideration. By examining my previous report it will be seen that in thirteen days we counted 1,595 vessels working on the various beds in both Sounds. From our records of the past season I find that the number observed by all persons was, in thirty-seven days, 2,275, or in 1878 the average number working on each day was 122, while in 1879 it was 61, or one-half as many. Therefore, the small yield of the beds during the autumn months of 1879, and the smail estimate of the yield for the year, may be accounted for by the smaller number of vessels at work, and as in round numbers the number of oysters estimated as taken in 1879 was about one-half that in 1878, I think that the previous estimate may be accepted as practically correct. ¥ My last advices from Crisfield inform me that there is but very little dredging going on in the Sounds, most of the vessels working in the bay and in the Potomac River. The principal cause assigned for this is the presence of young growth on the beds, by which is meant immature oysters under two years of age. The presence of this class in large numbers prevents the oysters from fattening rapidly. Another reason given is that the beds are much broken up, and that the returns are very poor for the usual amount of labor. CONCLUSIONS. My additional experience in the investigation and the information collected during the past season has proved that a few of the conclusions at which I arrived in 1878, and which are contained in my report of the operations of that season, are erroneous. Some of them have been already alluded to, and the allusions to the remaining ones here find their most appropriate place. I find my supposition that there is a general attachment of spat on all the beds in any season, to be, to a certain extent, incorrect. The spatting may be general, and a majority of the App. 11——10 74 oysters may spawn each year, but the attachment of the young is a very different thing, and as the most precarious period in the life of the oyster is that -just anterior to its attachment, a series of causes detrimental to the life of the embryo, while it is in its free swimming state, may readily occur, and thus prevent such attachment. My investigation of the past season has proved conclusively that the class of oysters termed “young growth” in my previous report were not of the brood of 1878 but of 1877 or 1876. The character of the young found in both seasons, the determination of the time of earliest attachment, and the growth and appearance of the oysters on the tiles, have led me to this conclusion. As the voung do not attach before the middle of August, they could hardly reach such a size and shape by October as would prevent their recog- nition as of the same season’s growth. From the inspection of the oysters taken during the last season, many being found with the generative matter unexpelled, I am of the opinion that a com- bination of natural causes may prevent the expulsion of both the male and female cells, and there would consequently be no impregnation during that season. As I mentioned in the report of 1878, many persons of experience are of that opinion, and I now concur with them in thinking that not only the attachment of young may not be general nor occur each year, but that the emission of the products of generation may also be frequently confined to partial areas, and that by a combination of circumstances Rod can be a total failure of impregnation on all beds of any locality. I also find by additional experience, that the yottng oyster is not fit for marketable purposes until at least a year and a half or two years old, and consequently the total number of young removed, as estimated in my previous report, would be a total sacrifice, and, as will be seen by the table showing the number of oysters removed, this sacrifice probably prmaninrail in 1878 to 148,800,000 oysters. By reference to the tables showing the success or failure of the several spatting seasons, it will be seen that there is little or no regularity of either success or failure, but as we have only been able to investigate the spatting of three seasons, it may be found by subsequent observations that two similar seasons of success, moderate success, or failure, will follow each other; but so far this has not been the case and in the period of three years we have, comparatively to the other seasons, one at least of successful attachment. I can see no reason for supposing that there is any regular recurrence of the spatting seasons, and am inclined to believe that the success or failure is due to two causes: variations of temperature and variations of density; but I had no means of ascer- taining the changes either of temperature or density in the years preceding those in which I have been engaged upon this investigation, and in both seasons I arrived in the Sounds too late for the temperatures or determinations of density obtained by the party to be, with reference to the spat- ting, of practical value. Oysters will and do live in very dissimilar temperatures and in waters of very different densi- ties, as is shown by their existence in the waters of North America from Nova Scotia to the Gulf, and on both Atlantic and Pacific coasts. That the mature oyster is a hardy animal, readily adapt- ing itself to new conditions and environment, is shown by the ease with which it is transplanted from the warm waters of the Chesapeake to the colder ones of New England; from the dense and salt waters of the ocean and bay to the brackish waters of the creeks and rivers or vice versa, and from soft bottoms to hard or the reverse; but, naturally, this hardiness is not a quality of the immature oysters or the swimming embryos. ' The influence of increased or diminished temperature upon the formation of the ova and sperma- tozoa must be very serious, and, judging by analogy, it would seem probable that the formation would be more rapid during a warm spring than during a cold one. Whether the formation has been late or early when once formed, a sudden change of density or of temperature may so affect the oyster or the generative matter that the latter would not be expelled. Only upon this hypothesis can be explained the retention of the products of generation noticed in so many oysters, and which is said to be so common, for none of the other conditions are subject to violent changes, such being peculiar to the density and temperature alone. Professor Brooks states that he found both ova and spermatozoa ripe and fit for fertilization about the middle of May, and as the oysters were taken from shoal water, probably one fathom deep, the shoal-water oysters were probably spawning throughout June. Both Professor Brooks and myself found the ripeness of the oysters to depend upon the depth of water from which-they 75 were taken, and this is without doubt caused by the difference of temperature. Professor Brooks also states that there was a great deal of cold, rainy weather during June, and two hail storms. The rainy weather would affect the density of the water by increasing the volumes of the various creeks and rivers, and the changes of density would probably affect the production and emission of the generative matter. It is an interesting coincidence at least, that the oysters found to be fattening with the products of generation unexpelled were either from beds in comparatively shoal water, or from the shoal parts of deep-water beds, and that those oysters should have been ripe and spawning during the month of June. Again, it may be that the lowness of the temperature prevented the deep-water oysters from ripening as soon as usual, and the mildness of the succeed- ing autumn may have prevented the destruction of the ova and spermatozoa, thus rendering possible the fertilization achieved by me in October, as the oysters from which I procured the ova and spermatozoa were taken from deep water. . Probably the influence of changes. of environment, especially of density and temperature of the water, is most severely felt by the embryo when in their free swimming state, and, in connec- tion with the want of success of the spatting season in the Sounds, it is noticed that the tempera- ture curves show a maximum change about the time when it is supposed that the young would attach in largest numbers, or when they were swimming about in the water. It is also worthy of notice that Professor Brooks, about this time, met with the minimum amount of success in his efforts to artificially raise the embryo. In consideration of the foregoing, J am of the opinion that the success or failure of any spatting season is dependent upon the equability of the temperature; that the higher the temperature during the spring months the earlier will be the advent of the spawning season, and that an increased temperature will also hasten the development of the spat, and of the young oysters after they have become attached. I also infer that sudden and extensive changes of density will like- wise affect the advent, duration, and success of the spawning. though to a lessextent. Subsequent to the attachment of the animal, changes of the conditions surrounding it are not of so much importance, though naturally such changes will more severely affect the delicate organism of the young oyster than that of the older and more hardened adult. During the first six months of its existence the oyster is exposed to the greatest danger from the numerous enemies which surround it. The thiu, delicate shells, from one-sixteenth of an inch to one inch in diameter, are readily bored by the drills or torn off by the crabs, and the immense number of both leaves no room to doubt their destructive effects. As an instance, the inspection of the spat collectors in the Big Annemessex River shows that during the early months of their existence about 50 per cent. of the young oysters were destroyed. Naturally, as the animal pro- gresses, it becomes more hardy and better able to resist the attacks of enemies and changes of environment, and thus we find on the unworked beds, where the oysters are practically in a natural state, that the decrease in passing from young growth to mature oysters is about 30 per cent., or about one-third of a given number perish in passing from the first to the fourth year of their existence. Here our information ceases, but enough has been gathered to indicate the ratio which nature has assigned as necessary between the young and the mature oysters. For every 1,000 of the latter there should be 1,500 of the former, if the number of brood oysters necessary to maintain the fecundity of the beds is to be kept up, and though this ratio is based upon data which are not quite sufficient, yet, as I have said, it is all that has been afforded as yet, and may be accepted within certain limits. Certainly, whatever it should be, the number of the rising generation of the ani- mals should never be less than that of the older, or there should always be as many young as mature on any bed, and a greatly increased ratio of young to mature oysters would show either one of two things—either the mortality in passing from youth to maturity was much greater than shown by the dredging results in the bay, or that a very large number of mature oysters had been removed by other than natural causes. In considering these several beds the question of food and other necessary supplies has not been considered, as it is evident that where an oyster bed is formed and exists naturally, all the conditions for its successful life are probably present, and any failure of an important supply would be followed by a speedy extinction of all the oysters on the bed. Such determinations of the quality 16 and quantity of the food, character of,bottom and water, and other matters, are only of interest and desirable for the purpose of comparing one locality with another. Such was not the purpose of this investigation, and consequently the determination of those points has been but incidental to the work. Probably the fecundity of a bed is increased, to a certain extent, by working upon it. The dredges or other implements used open the bed and spread it, thus giving more room for develop- ment, and allowing a greater amount of food to reach the animals, and as the mortality is great in all thickly-populated tracts and in any closely-united community, it is evident that no removal of brood oysters could be effected without destroying the fecundity of the bed, did not this very removal influence the mortality among the young so as to allow a larger number to come to matur- ity. But the removal of brood oysters may become so great that the most.violent exertions of nature to supply others are unequal to the demand, and it must be evident that as soon as the number of brood oysters is thus diminished, the fecundity of the bed is impaired. This impairment constantly increases, influencing, as it does, both old and young. As the number of the latter decrease, so will the number of the former, and as that number is again and again diminished, the number of young produced by them must constantly diminish. Thus the cause for the destruction of the fecundity of the bed and the gradual extinction of the animals upon it can be readily understood and as easily comprehended as the fact that the fecundity or productive power of a bed depends upon the number of mature spawn-bearing oysters upon it. It is not meant by this that none but the mature oysters are capable of reproduction, as such is not the case, oysters of even six or nine months’ growth having been observed by me with ripe ova and spermatozoa in them, but the main dependence must be placed upon the adults in the com- munity, as the spawn of the young growth is not considerable when compared with that of the other class. Without a knowledge of the number of oysters on a bed it is impossible to say what number should be removed, and as an attainment of the knowledge of the numer on the bed is almost impossible, all that can be done is to keep the ratios between the young and the mature as nearly the same as on the natural beds; this should be the aim and result of all laws having the protection of the beds in view. Referring to that portion of this report relating to the fecundity of the beds in the Sounds, it is seen that in some cases the ratio of young to mature oysters is greater, and in other cases less, than it should be, and that in a few cases the ratio seems to be within the prescribed limits. As has been shown, the decreased ratios must be the result of a want of reproduction, while the increase may be due to the removal of the mature oysters. If we take the total number of the oysters examined in the Sounds we will have a ratio express- ing the general fecundity of the beds, and this ratio between 70,866 mature oysters and 36,824 young ones is 0.5. Assembling all the oysters counted on the beds in the bay we would have as a ratio L.5. Practically, none of the mature oysters had been removed from the beds in the bay, while large numbers had been taken from those in the Sounds. The estimates for each show, approxi- mately, how many have been taken, and if by examination we find that the number of young oysters taken off the beds in the Sounds greatly exceeds the number of mature removed, it may be assumed that the restoration of both classes to the beds would be immediately shown by a change in the ratio of young growth to mature oysters. By the estimate of 1878 we find that 184,600,000 mature and 148,800,000 young were removed, but as the number of young removed would be less and less during the season on account of the mortality among them, and as we have found that mortality to be about 50 per cent., I will consider that the removal of the young during the season of 1878 and 1879 probably did not exceed 74,400,000. Therefore the total number removed was 259,000,000, of which 71 per cent. were mature, spawn-bearing oysters, and as 65 per cent. of the oysters at present on the beds are mature, the addition of the 260,000,000 removed would raise this percentage to 68, which would make the ratio of young to old even smaller. Consequently the small percentage of young is not due to the removal of that class during the previous season. The two beds of which we have the most exact and complete statistical records in this season e 717 are the Woman’s Marsh and the Great Rock, and, by means of the record of statistics, I estimate that the following number of oysters have been removed from them: Table showing number of oysters removed from Great Rock and Woman’s Marsh. Removed in a year. : i Total both | Percentage Name of bed. classes. | of matte! Mature. | Young. | | | | i z CF 5 => aes i? a iat tenes Riad 5 i Oe ¥ "a | (jae ead lee ai ar a Ginanth IROWE coconcos sssoccoapsacos aban bcces ooo dsaeoo ses couancoos secnbe osconseDboadcaBoSoaagaaE | 10, 176, 000 | 5, 640, 000 | 15, 816, 000 | 64 WWOnnRiHS WET ccaccnsusutongouccesaouacssaa Gn sooedospenos conencocDesonescoseneécncnas span 1,740,000 768,000 | 2, 508, 000 | 69 From Table II, dredging results in the Sounds, I find the percentage of mature oysters to the total number on the two beds mentioned is on the Great Rock 24, and on the Woman’s Marsh 36. Hence, if there had been no fishing, we would have on the Great Rock 44 per cent. of the oysters mature and full grown, and on the Woman’s Marsh 52 per cent. mature. We find by making a similar calculation for Piney Island Bar that the percentage of mature oysters removed is 70, and that by the dredging results 20 per cent. of those on the bed were mature; hence, 45 per cent. would represent the percentage on Piney Island Bar had there been no fishing. The ratios on these beds would then, were the oysters removed still present, be 1.2 on the Great Rock, 0.9 on the Woman’s Marsh, and 1.2 on Piney Island Bar. It will be seen by the above that there has been a severe fishing of many of the beds in the Sounds during the last four or five years—that is, exhaustive of mature brood oysters—and that consequently the large ratios of young to mature oysters is not the result of a large attachment of young, but rather of the removal of the older oysters, and hence the change from a large ratio to a very small one, or vice versa, may be regarded as a safe indication of the deterioration of the bed; for, as explained in the previous part of this report, the ratio will remain abnormally large until the young growth reach maturity, when it will become abnormally small, and will so remain for a few years, when it will again become very large, and this process will continue for some time until the beds are practically unfit for dredging, as is the case in Pocomoke Sound. Thus not even the ratios are sure indications of the increase or decrease in the number of oysters, but they must be considered together with other facts before we can arrive at just conclusions. By reference to the closing paragraphs of that part of the report relating to the fecundity of the beds, it will be noticed that the amount of débris increases on the southern Tangier beds, and that on most of the beds of the Sounds it is much greater than it was in the bay. An increase of the percentage of débris, as already pointed out, is an indication of the deterioration of the bed, and is due to the destructive effects of the dredging, which not only removes many oysters, but so disturbs many others that their destruction is an almost assured fact. To a certain extent this is a necessary incident of the fishery, and cannot be helped; but overworking the beds increases this evil as well as others, as is evident by the percentage on many of the Pocomoke beds. Referring to the table showing the number of oysters removed in 1878, and comparing it with the table of number of oysters to the square yard, the following may be noticed: 1st. In the upper part of Tangier Sound the numbers to the square yard are very large, which is probably due to the shoalness of the water and the soft bottom, which allowed a larger number of oysters to be taken. In addition, the mature oysters are smaller than on the southern beds, as shown in Table I, dredging results; thus a greater number would be taken in the dredge, and the number to the square yard increased. 2d. Though the numbers to the square yard are very large, yet there is a serious decrease from that established in 1873. By reference to the ‘Table showing number of oysters removed,” I find that the largest num- ber of oysters were removed from this section in both seasons, and, supposing the number of dredging vessels to have been constant, instead of diminishing one-half, the number of oysters removed in 1879 would be greater by 14,000,000 than the number removed in 1878, or, in other words, the fishing is proportionally increasing. As this fishing is confined principally to the 78 mature oysters, it can be readily understood why the number of these oysters to the square yard should be much decreased. In the second section we find the numbers to be nearly the same as those outside; that there is a gain in the rivers where there is the minimum amount of dredging, and also on two beds which were worked very little in 1878-79, on account of the young growth which had attached to them. The proportional increase of dredging, as shown by the numbers removed in each season, and supposing the number of dredging vessels to have been the same, would be, on this section, 11,000,000; these were taken principally from the western beds and Piney [sland Bar, and on those beds there is a diminished number to the square yard. Again, we find by reference to the tables, that on the southern beds in Tangier Sound the number to the square yard is much smaller than on the beds in the bay. This is due probably to two causes—the condition of the bed, or the depth of the water, hardness of bottom and size of the oysters, and to the removal of too large a number of mature oysters during previous years- As I have pointed out, where the number on a worked bed falls much below that on an unworked one, it must, other things being equal, be accepted as an indication of a decrease in the productiv- ity of the bed. That much is assured; but on this section there appears to be an increase in the number of oysters to the square yard over the number found in 1878, and that increase must be accounted for in some way. The table showing the number of oysters removed proves the number taken from this section to be a constantly decreasing one, for in 1878 there were taken by twice as many vessels four times aS many oysters as were removed in 1879. This may be due to two causes, and probably is due, to some extent, to both. The productivity of the beds may be impaired, or the fishery may be less earnest and exhaustive than in the past. We can only account for the increased number to the square yard by assuming the latter to be the case, the beds having probably enforced a resting period by the material failure of the oysters. The numbers to the square yard and yield in Pocomvke Sound need no comment. Not only are the numbers below the standard and decreasing, but the yield is also decreasing, as it natu- rally would under such circumstances. Naturally, as soon as any bed ceases to give an adequate return for the labor expended upon it, the dredging vessels will seek other aud more profitable fields for exertion, and the desertion of any bed may be accepted as an indication of its decreased productive power. As has been men- tioned under the head of statistical information, dredging vessels have, to a great extent, left the Sounds for the waters of the bay and Potomac River. Considering the abnormal ratios between the mature and young oysters, the increased per- centage of débris on the beds, the smallness of the number to the square yard, and the decrease of those numbers on most of the beds, together with the large number of oysters, young and old, annually removed, I am of the opinion that though the fecundity of the beds in Tangier Sound is not yet destroyed, it is very much impaired, and that not only are the beds rapidly and surely deteriorating from the excessive fishery, but that their total failure, like unto that in Pocomoke Sound, is but a question of time. So far as it is possible to nrake any more exact prediction than the above, | am of the opinion that, the fishery still continuing, thi: failure will occur first on the beds at the entrances of the Sound or those in sections 1 and 3, and of the two the failure of the lower beds is most likely to first occur, and of all the beds the Woman’s Marsh will be the first to give out. As stated at the beginning of this report, the beds may be protected either indirectly by enlarg- ing the areas for the dredgers or insuring by artificial means the maturity of a larger number of spat; or directly, by limiting and restricting the fishery. I alluded in my previous report to the manner in which this latter form of protection was afforded abroad, and suggested a manner for affording it at home. The necessity for the adoption of some such measures seems so urgent that I earnestly hope they will shortly be undertaken. The extension of the dredging ground can be easily attained by depositing the shells from the shell heaps about the packing houses on the bottoms contiguous to the natural beds; but such deposit should always be made in the direction of the ebb and flow of the tide, in order that the drifting spat may be carried over the newly-exposed cultch. The bottom is of minor importance 719 so long as it is of sufficient consistency to prevent the oysters from sinking into the mud. A sticky clay bottom is preferable, though the beds may be extended over sand shoals. In searching for new beds they will probably be found about the mouths of estuaries and rivers, and where there are sudden changes of bottom. In the Chesapeake, depths of from two to four fathoms will be most likely to reward a search, and where there are large beds in the creeks and rivers it is likely that there has been a natural expansion through their mouths, and beds wil] probably be found off of them. The search must be carefully conducted, or the beds, which appear to be long, narrow ridges, will be missed. The dredge should be dragged across the tide, as the beds usually extend in the direction of the current. A sudden change of depth of two or three feet, and from soft to hard bottom when on an oyster ground, is an unfailing sign of the presence of a patch or bed. Considering the success which has attended the investigation of Professor Brooks, and the new light which it has thrown upon the embryo life of the oyster, I think that perhaps the most efficacious means of maintaining the productive power of the beds would be in bringing, if such be possible, the artificial impregnation of the eggs and subsequent care of the young to such a state of perfection as would be of practical utility. Professor Brooks is, of course, the best person to devise the method of successfully continuing his experiment, and I hope that he may be able to do se and that he will meet with complete success. As pertinent to his work, which is mainly conducted by means of aquaria, I would suggest that the study of the effect of changes of temperature, so far as they affect the embryo, can be best and most easily done while engaged upon the attempt to artificially raise them; or, in order to arrive at certain conclusions with regard _ to the effect of changes of density or of temperature, the investigation, if conducted on the natural beds, must be extended over many seasons in order to insure, by a coincidence of temperatures or densities and results, the elimination of other affecting conditions. The study of the temperature seems So important that any suggestion with regard to it is of value and should claim attention. I would also recommend that some person inspect and count, at intervals, the oysters on the spat collector in the Big Annemessex River. It is securely moored and buoyed with a spar buoy, and probably will remain in place. With regard to the direct protection of the beds in the Sounds, I can only renew my previous recommendations. : The deterioration of any bed will be evident by an abnormal ratio of young growth to mature oysters; by a small and decreasing number to the square yard; by large and increasing percentage of broken shells and other débris, and by the appearance of the oysters, as has been described. When all these indications are present, if the dredging is not totally prohibited it should at least be so limited as to insure the number of young growth remaining at least one third greater than the number of mature, and great changes from this ratio are to be avoided and guarded against. APPENDIX A. Areas of oyster beds. Square yards. Fishing Bay Beds (solid)....... Plsrse par steemn tele ares odie he 3, 600, 000 Hishine Bay, Beds(seattered) 2. 5..22-2-2 5-22. hen eee se 25, 605, 000 WieresPoimt: (Sole), cvs yes cleo sees sees se nek see Sects 1, 845, 000 Shankésebimy (SOM d\irscise ae wcrc en momo a aes cess eee 8G0,000 Nanticoke (Sold) Pee a eee oe a eee oes 5st) 3,465,000 ClomprPoimt (Solid) ep esesss. kee Rc te + et do dick Bay tel tee Bin P ia ee ie q ‘Baye 7 thy aA sf Nie iis Spay Dy, |e Phe see | sakvoueurd-vetixr : a sf YT P pide ae a ae i { vo wage es | a aa is Kok Ws YO 2 i; ve Uma | ihe es qaariess 1H rag) ana “ mu ‘e an “ . a hI Suhre i that f Pitas esas he ely at mse gent Baa bad | 7 AeepeBHRD: \genchow: oh das alti fart) tock Lisi a . ee Siu. in si few Rise Gr On wi Lal yes cc! aliapll yeenle old ot ig Y ais BF pimeeila | ane Tin | Marnie tt Boh rie vl ere ay Wey: D a er be i No.63 | Coast and Geodetic Survey Report, 1881 ASTYRIS: variety WINSLOVI CHESAPEAKE BAY, NEAR CRISFIELD, MD. Reported to be injurious to young oysters 20 SCALE: “> 81 APPENDIX B. DESCRIPTION OF THE “DRILL” REFERRED TO IN THE REPORT OF THE OPERATIONS DURING THE SEASON OF 1878. IBYe Who lal, IDAming AESBs Co ey Cy Hwirywywises Only a few specimens were preserved, and hence it is impossible to speak positively in regard to its distinctness from the allied forms Astyris spizantha (Rav.) and A. lunata Dall (Ex. Say). It differs from the former, so far as the specimens go, in color, pattern, and solidity, having also more whorls and a more slender form. It differs in form very much from southern specimens of A. lunata, but more specimens of each are needed to determine the limits of variation in these small shells. They belong to a group known to be extremely variable. It may for the present be denominated by the varietal name Astyris var.. Winslovii in com- memoration of its discoverer. Though known to be carnivorous, no species of the genus Ast, Yes has been recorded until now as an injurious animal. APPENDIX C. Table showing number and class of dredging vessels seen from the Palinurus during the season of 1878. E ee 8 = 4A q a Pe eS Co) Q 2 mb a % Ground on which at work. 3 oS © H : : H H oH oO o Oo ° 2 a 2 2 & g Q | g 8 5 & 5 5 A 4 | A A 1878. Sept. 18 57 2) | ROCOMOKE|SOUMG aera tes-1m ain ialnleierelelel= === = einininlslel-l2)=)> ya eeeesaeconse | 19| 43 23 llsoaaoe GID). sqedues onacue cooenetonocescasanou0aseudeD CO se sea Bones 20 51 1 | Southern part Tangier Sound...........-..-..-- 2, 142 432, 684 20 61 2h ocomoke Soundersee esses ese eae stineaeeniee 1 OB |leacacucesces } 23 | 123 | 1 | Southern part Tangier Sound ...-..-...--....-.. 5,166 | 1, 043, 532 | 25| 85 sl ee Cote re ae re Bane aK enaeat hee cena ee 3, 570 721, 140 26 | 104 MW ioscsbe GIO) = Ssadasnd sacunE dos usoandansesedesenecosad 4, 368 882, 336 | 29} 65 1 | Middle part Tangier Sound ...-....-.--. epasses: 2, 730 551, 460 30 20 ue Mano kinehivieteensercecereerteciee crises reeeeie BBP) llesocganosace Oct. 1 37 el mOnwthemGreatbpRocke eres tera reece cesar 1, 554 313, 908 3 26 Ie MOneHarrisebednessscee arise eee cm ere arescece 1, 092 220, 584 3 20 1) On Derrapin Sands=-2--- = --)- 24-0. sec - cen sone 840 169, 680 3 16 27\nOneMusclevloles=smee eee eee ete eeeeeeeeeeee 266 58, 732 3 14 15) On) Piney sland eBare aac 3-5 i & , * } : t iy 4 ' . a eae exe Coast and Geodetic Survey Report for /88/ No.62 ; 7 F| PN TSN Ce [7 B| SpUND 1 { | pate to | 14 i | abet won ! | + { ceay Siege a U.S.COAST AND GEODETIC SURVEY C. P. Patterson, Superintendent JAMES RIVER :\WPORT NEWS TO DEEP WATER LIGHT HOWING APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF OYSTER BEDS As determined by |FRANCIS WINSLOW,Master U.S.N.Assist. Commanding Schooner Palinurwus August, 1878 peels Scale 56,000 Drawn by H.W Fowler i No. 45 Coast and Geodetic Surrey Report for 1881 We 2 = aga 3/ bhiBeds z Be Pig Point Derr WATE . . yer /) Kareena » a paeele/f Ws / * “\y 4 8 : FESUENAE OMS ne yy 20 z= = 2 =f Ira 2% ph a one CD) eee nn ge GS) ‘S) 25 20 wh Oia Beas covev™ * Jd ta eb U.S.COAST AND GEODETIC SURVEY C, P. Patterson, Superintendent JAMES RIVER FROM NEWPORT NEWS TO DEEP WATER LIGHT SHOWING APPROXIMATE LIMITS - OF OYSTER BEDS As determined by FRANCIS WINSLOW,Master U.S.N.Assist. Commanding Schooner Palinurus August, 1878 Scale agovo \ , Neuticul Miles 2 Bs D > a ee ro + > Drawn by EM Fowler Seintey OU Ort t ¥ ORO GR i ele rhe: i | : > ' - . Coeet Ne 46 Surren Kepornt tar Mil ot ata Vea fect 9 mire [fitaek Watinbt LS. COAST AND GEODRTIE SURVEY C.P, Patterson, Superintendent Upper part of TANGIER SOUND CITART STLOWING APPROXIMATE POSTTION OF OYSTER BEDS delormined by FRANCIS WINSLOW, Master U.S.N.Assist. Commanding Schooner Valinurus September (878 Seale soone Nunilical Miles # ee rn be x 4 unt ey etcc, ; = al 1 Billy's tl. A én SOUNDINGS: The sinvratinge iin sipoveat ire Fork cveept Uieswe thet wrteetinead (iJ, which are tn sik show the depth ab nisi low weternthe plane af relives 2 > * Deum © Ag yy 44 2 ie SEN >; el te Ast, nai Veiokly a em ig 1 ih + Coast and Geodetic Survey Report rir 1881 j ULS.COAST AND GEODETIC SURVEY G.P. Patterson Superintendent r aE aeons Lae Lower part of NGIER SOUND AND POCOMOKE SOUND CHART SHOWING APPROXIMATE POSITION OF OYSTHR BEDS As determined by FRANCIS WINSLOW,Master U.S. N.Angsist. Commanding Schooner Palinucus September 1878 Seale sgove k ACs s a “| Gath fe «In a ioe iQ 8 5 lon s aa Ria Pp R 4 “ Ais ut are a a ante 6 aa 3 s s ‘ a th Fit oe ye a ine an , ni wai ist ma at 2 WaleschHanmex 9 2 i bag it ats a? 4 u Little Thorough Nf Devel gee ca psn tn Kt i onan pant 1VYUdIT1 LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN NUOILIILILONG NUINUSRLIING sstGvadit LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INS) Z g z g g Z z g Be Oe : : e Sd pe OWS 5 . WE IS F 9 a. 9 5 YY 3S F \ Uys r Nr O 2 Ss x oO a \N O VN a z E z = 2G = oe a . 2 = ie SB 2 : a ae Ww . ITUTION NOILNLILSNI NVINOSHLIWS S3IYVWUSIT LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI NVINOSHLIWS S31 Re a ae nf 4, bd <3; ly LIBRARIES LIBRARIES VYGIIT LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILONLILSNI NVINOSHLINS S3IYVYdIT LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INS) AS o wy ~ LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI NVINOSHLINS S31 ‘ YS sit uvYy @i1 LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILOALILSNI INSTITUTION NOILALILSNI INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI S3ZIuYVYEIT LIBR f fy ; tg r& LUD Satuvuagi Satuvudi TUTION NOILALILSNI NVINOSHLIWS N INSTITUTION NOILNILILSNI SJiYVvVudit NVINOSHLIWS Sa1uvugi LIBRARIES a) z i Zz n z no z l by = = = = = fH, § = 4 = Gy 2 5 ze 5 = Gi & 2 & fbi? : 8 2 8 Ml? g Z Gees 2 = = 25 7 OE ea ~. : > 2 a ONOLLNLILSNI~ a 2 a S _LIBRARI ES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ‘ Se Nee _LIBRARI ES SMITHSONIAN _INS] Z ; 2 Ww =z WwW z Q = Oy? : “ = g 2 G 2 < GG Yaa < 2 -< 2 < a 4 Bs Hn fe = a a = a 3 a: 5 = 2 ~ o = o i ey z at) = - z ot =z TUTION _NOILNLILSNI_NVINOSHLINS | $3 iuvud atl BRARIES ~ SMITHSONIAN _INSTITUTION ZNOILALILSNI_NVINOSHLIWS ea i fo) = NG Oo Fa o a ro) = Re 6) — ow = ow = aw — ow SS: — 5 2 5 2 5 Gif 5 = wa 5 = a e 25 = Gg» = = \ E le is - a - GLK, fs = a Ee 2 r 2 e oo * & 2 IVUGIT_LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN — op NOWLALILSNI NVINOSHLIWS S3luved ald SMITHSONIAN _ INS _< KC = < = = t = od Lad > Yap pate x = = 2 UP fp wn w — rs iS @ z = Oo a TUTION NOILNLILSNI_ NVINOSHLINS S3iuyvVudIT_LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI_ NVINOSHLINS S31 bh SVYGIT LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION A LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INS) % NVINOSHLIWS Sl uvugiy LIBRARIES NVINOSHLIWS NVINOSHLIWS SMITHSONIAN NVINOSHLINS ‘Ns A SMITHSONIAN Li, NVINOSHLIWS NVINOSHLIAS aie NVINOSHLIWS $31 Ne NOILNLILSNI NOILNLILSNI NOILNLILSNI NOILALILSNI ITUTION NOILALILSNI NVINOSHLINS S3IYVUGIT LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI Jiuvuail LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN J1YVYGIT LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN JIYVUGIT LIBRARIES ISTITUTION NOILNLILSNI JIMVUEIT LIBRARIES ISTITUTION ISTITUTION ISTITUTION ISTITUTION ee a a FF ar FFU ENF be WUT 8S Sarre ee Crue eee Fey SS et FP ae F Ce Fe el PS Ve ee WE ae TO we wre Fe EO OP ve ‘ (2) = . a) on & = Bed = z = 3 Ed : = a "2 NY |S z = z = 4 oO Soe ro) IWS ae ra) T5, - ro) Be 2 g 2 NE 2 2 g 2 g = = = x 2 = za = Z S > ‘ = > Ss > S > i ” = w . — ” a ; 7) mm IBRARIES SMITHSONIAN _INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI NVINOSHLIWS _LIBRARI ES SMITHSONIAN _ INSTITUTION Zz uw ge tet, z z “g = KY = g ne 4H < : WS i eS 4 4 5 a \ 5 = re) = = Oo e) iz ay a z z. NVINOSHLINS S3I1Y¥VYUdIT LIBRARIES ‘“ » IBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION x ix SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILOLILSNI_NVINOSHLINS S31YV¥gi1 oe ~ 7 SJIYVYSITLIBRARIES INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI S3Z1uYVvVuUdiT LIBRARIES INSTITUTION INSTITUTION saiuvyugi INSTITUTION sziuvug NOLLNLILSNI_NVINOSHLINS S3iuvugiT_ LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NVINOSHLINS S3tYVYSIT LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN OILNLILSNI NVINOSHLINS S3iYWVYdIT LIBRARIES INSTITUTION NOILNLILSN! NVINOSHLINS S31yuVualI o s on = < Z < Ed < * = aS a = SS = z = = = z \. : 6 WE i § z 5 Ney s SS fo) x S$ WW ais ro} Te ro) xr WY A = Wz. E z E 2 ENS = 7) ee 2 77) Zz 7) oe z n 2 _NVINOSHLINS S3ZIYVYSIT LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI_ NWINOSHLINS S3IYVeaII a uw 2 z z ip = ul 2 oh = ” re un = al} = a) = a a ow wet a = nS = —4 ieee =a + c = < ye < Se ss WY: = S = E = * = 7 bi RS co = 2 a 2 = 2 5 Se anes E = IBRARI ES _ SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILMLILSNI_NVINOSHLIWS Saiuvua ie BRARI ES_ SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Z z S w = ow ° o wo 2 = 2 = 2 E 0 Ee 2 = ey > ps Bas = > ae > ro = Zz - 2 F ee = 2 i wn = _ Oo _ : o : a Z 2 o S o = = SEY, ae O 3 = > 2 SMITHSONIAN SMITHSONIAN *, Gy . Vide NVINOSHLIWS NVINOSHLIWS \ NN \ SMITHSONIAN 6G LIBRARIES > IBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI Yi Wf Y feo NVINOSHLIWS SMITHSONIAN _ INSTITUTION RLES < 3; LIBRARIES LIBRARIES NOILNLILSNI NOILNLILSNI S3'IYVYdIT LIBRARIES INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI NVINOSHLINS S3JI¥Vy¥gII \~ {7 SFlYVYAIT LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILALILSNI INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI INSTITUTION Ssaiuvadit INSTITUTION SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILALILSNI NVINOSHLIWS x KK Ss IBRARIES S3iuvugia LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NVINOSHLINS SZIYVUSIT LIBR NVINOSHLINS S3SIYUYVUBIT LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN NVINOSHLIWS S31uUVvVYEg NS \ SMITHSONIAN SMITHSONIAN NVINOSHLIWS NVINOSHLIWS Yq \x ANG SMITHSONIAN SMITHSONIAN NVINOSHLINS S31YVYEI7T LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI_ NVINOSHLIWS Ss 7) oS ee = = 2 o 2 g 2 2 5 us z = i 4 = at = = w = f= Sa c < Agi < c was Cc a S\ co = mo. = a re) & oO Zz C0 = or S sj 2 z z IBR oe SMITHSONIAN _ NSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI NVINOSHLIANS S3Iluvud! eS LIBRARI ESS SMITHSONIAN _ eS a ae eur LD Cae ea ae i. hers. Ais TM ile oh 7 a o> Son Sell NS os 2 prea Q a) = _ 2 Wr; = x = ile & Pai Sai Rh re > rai > = a = es] ee es) = @ > : : B - a nm z m 2 m Zz ous > —_ pitas sees eaten Oe SEN ont hieenee ne ee ee a erat eevee,