IH^Ip HARVARD UNIVERSITY Library of the Museum of Comparative Zoology UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS ^'mmL^i^ATfoM MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY No 52 MUS. APf? 1 4 1975 Harvard A Demographic Study of the Ringneck Snake (Diadophis punctatus) in Kansas By Henry S. Fitch UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE 1975 April 3, 1975 UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS PUBLICATIONS MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY The University of Kansas Publications, Museum of Natural History, beginning with volume 1 in 1946, was discontinued with volume 20 in 1971. Shorter research papers formerly published in the above series are now published as Occasional Papers, Museum of Natural History. The Miscellaneous Publications, Museum of Natural History, began with nimiber 1 in 1946. Longer research papers are pub- lished in that series. Monographs of the Museum of Natural History were initiated in 1970. All manuscripts are subjected to critical review by intra- and extramural speciaHsts; final acceptance is at the discretion of the publications committee. Institutional libraries interested in exchanging pubhcations may obtain the Occa- sional Papers and Miscellaneous Publications by addressing the Exchange Librarian,! University of Kansas Library, Lawrence, Kansas 66045. Individuals may purchase separate numbers of all series. Prices may be obtained upon request addressed to Publications Secretary, Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas, Law- rence, Kansas 66045. i The University of Kansas Museum of Natural History Miscellaneous Publication No. 62 April 3, 1975 A Demographic Study o£ the Ringneck Snake (Diadophis punctatus) in Kansas by Henry S. Fitch Department of Systematics and Ecology Natural History Reservation The University of Kansas The University of Kansas Lawrence 1975 University of Kansas Publications, Museum of Natural History Editor: Richard F. Jolinston Miscellaneous Publication No. 62 pp. 1-53; 19 figures Published April 3, 1975 Museum of Natural History The University of Kansas Lawrence, Kansas 66045 U.S.A. Printed by University of Kansas Printing Service Law^rence, Kansas CONTENTS ABSTRACT 4 INTRODUCTION ............ 4 Acknowledgements 5 Materials and Methods 5 Morphology 8 HABITAT 11 BEHAVIOR 12 TEMPERATURE RELATIONSHIPS 18 SEASONAL SCHEDULE 19 ASSOCIATED ANIMALS 20 FOOD HABITS 22 SPATIAL RELATIONSHIPS 24 REPRODUCTION 27 Aggregation and Mating 27 Reproductive Cycles 28 Eggs 29 Size of Clutch 29 Reproductive Effort 31 Nests 32 GROWTH 33 POPULATION DENSITY 39 COMPOSITION OF THE POPULATION 43 Age Structure 43 Sex-ratio 45 PREDATION 47 DISCUSSION 50 LITERATURE CITED 52 ABSTRACT Field records of more dian 14,000 individuals of Diadophis piinctatus were assembled over a 26-year period on several small study areas at the University of Kansas Natural History Reser\ation, mostly within a half-mile radius, with emphasis on marking and recapture. Emergence from hibernation begins in late March and continues into early April, ovulation occurs in the latter half of May, and the elongate, sausage-shaped eggs, averaging approxi- mately 3.9 per clutch, are laid in late June or early July. Hatching occurs at the end of August or in September. Females become sexually mature after their third hibernation, typically at a snout-vent (S-V) length of approximately 235 mm, but males mature a year earlier, at a min- imum length (S-V) of 166 mm. Growth continues, but at a reduced rate, after attainment of sexual maturity. Snakes already above average adult size typically gain from one to three per cent in length annually. Mortality of adults is not age-specific, and loss is approximately 25 per cent annually. A small percentage of the snakes survives to an age of 15 or more years. Young seem more secretive than adults and are less well represented in samples. Sex-ratio in samples is subject to drastic seasonal fluctuation; females range from 24 per cent in early fall to 71 per cent in midsummer, but in late March, April and early May, when the snakes are most in evidence, males are always more numerous. The snakes are active over a wide range of temperatures but tend to maintain body temperatures between 25 and 29.5 degrees C. Their surface activity is chiefly at air temperature witliin or below this range, and at higher air temperatures they retreat underground. Body temperature is maintained by con- tact with sun-warmed objects that the snakes use for shelter. Occasionally, at relatively low air temperatures, the snakes venture into the open and bask in sunshine. Earthworms, especially AHoIohophora caliginosa, provide most of the food, and it is esti- mated that each snake consumes on the average approximately three times its body weight in earthworms annually. Seven calculations of population density (based upon recapture ratios) varied from 719 to 1849 per ha and averaged 1266. Eight kinds of predators on the Reser- vation were found to eat ringneck snakes, but their toll would account for only part of popu- lation regulation. The copperhead, racer and Red-tailed Hawk were the predators in most recorded instances, but moles, mice and birds other than raptors may also be among the im- portant predators. Marked snakes were recaptured at distances of zero to 520 m from the original capture site; however, one-fourth were within 10 m, even after intervals of several years, showing a strong tendency to remain within a home area. Home ranges were often elongate, with maximum axes of approximately 140 m. Ranges tend to be progressively altered through time. INTRODUCTION The ringneck snake (Diadophis piinc- tatus) is a highly successful transconti- nental North American species. Its local populations are adapted to the swamp- land of subtropical southern Florida, the boreal forest of heavily glaciated areas in northern Michigan and the desert grassland of the southwestern United States. Partly because of retiring or se- cretive habits, the species is considered rare throughout most of its extensive ge- ographic range. However, in a central area including northeastern Kansas, where my study was made, it is abun- dant and ecologically prominent. Soon after field work began on the newly-created University of Kansas Nat- ural History Reservation, the ringneck snake attracted attention as one of the common animals meriting intensive study because of its probable ecological roles as a consumer of invertebrates and as an abundant food source for larger preda- tors. In the ensuing 26 years the species has been allotted more time and effort than any other kind of animal in the many autecological studies carried out on the Reservation. This small snake has proven to be a difficult subject for field study, despite its great abundance. Individuals ordi- narily cannot be observed readily under natural conditions. When uncovered or discovered in the open, they are glimpsed only momentarily, escaping underground or into dense vegetation. The snakes cannot be found for most of the year, including, of course, their hibernation season. But they are also difficult to find in summer, especially in hot and dry weather. The present study had its inception FITCH: A DEMOGRAPHIC STUDY OF THE RINGNECK SNAKE in the spring of 1949 when I began tak- ing field notes on ringneck snakes and individually marking those that were captured. In the 1950s the snakes were observed or marked only occasionally, as part of a comprehensive program to study the vertebrates of the Reservation. Several students at different times under- took ecological studies of Diadophis in the area: John Hawken (1951-1952), Robert M. Hedrick (1956-1957) and Kenneth Shain (1958-1959). Hawken's and Hedrick's records were mostly from the Rat Ledge area, whereas Shain's were from the vicinity of the Reservation headquarters. Although each of these projects was of short duration, their combined data contributed substantially to my study. In the spring of 1964 large-scale cap- ture and marking of Diadophis was un- dertaken at Rat Ledge, in the field near Reservation headquarters "House Field," and in "Quarry Field" along the northern edge of the Reservation ( Fig. 1 ) . On 24 September 1965 a system was initiated for recording the pattern of pigmentation on the posterior ventrals to supplement the clipping of scales as a means of posi- tive individual identification. In 1966, operations at Rat Ledge were abandoned and field work was concentrated in the House Field and Quarry Field areas, which were close enough that snakes often shifted from one to the other. The marking program was suspended at the end of May, 1968, but in the spring of 1969 all first-year young cap- tured were group-marked and those considered yearlings were individually marked in an eff^ort to gain more infor- mation about the growth of young. In the fall of 1969, and in 1970 through 1974, efforts to capture the snakes were continued; those taken were not marked but were measured, weighed, sexed, and carefully examined for marks made in the period 1958 through 1969. Hence, although procedures and areas have var- ied somewhat from year to year, my in- tensive field study extended over an eleven-year period, and was supple- mented by 15 years' accumulation of earlier data. Expenditure of so much time and energy on a local population of one species may appear prodigal; yet, the recapture records that were the key to an understanding of ecological rela- tionships and population dynamics to- talled only a few hundred, and when these were subdivided into sexes and ages, some samples were inadequately small. Acknowledgments Members of my family, Alice Fitch Echelle, Chester W. Fitch, John H. Fitch and Virginia R. Fitch, helped me from time to time, both with the field work and with various stages in the analysis of data. Many persons helped in the search and capture of the snakes; Robert R. Fleet's contribution of many large series was especially outstanding. John Hawken, the late Robert M. Hed- rick, and Kenneth Shain each contrib- uted data accumulated from one or more seasons of field work. Donald R. Clark, Robert W. Henderson, Richard L. Lattis, Julian Lee, Michael V. Plummer, Eric Rundquist, and Arnold K. Smith were employed as research assistants at differ- ent times, and all contributed substan- tially. In 1971, 1972, and 1973, while engaged in his own field research on the Reservation, Lattis captured and con- tributed many ringneck snakes marked in 1969 or before; these long term sur- vivors provided some of the most reveal- ing records of longevity, growth, and population structure. Financial support from the National Science Foundation (6-17084) and from the University of Kansas is gratefully acknowledged. Materials and Methods In spring ringneck snakes were found in large numbers beneath flat rocks, es- pecially in open woodland or at wood- land edge, at hilltop edges including "Skink Ledge," "Rat Ledge," and an old I 6 MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATION MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY 500 m Fig. 1. — Contour map of northwestern part of The University of Kansas Natural History Resei-vation showing study areas of Diadophis punctatus, 1949 to 1974. A. "Quarry Field," a flat hilltop with tall grass interspersed with brush. B. Abandoned limestone quarry at south exposure of hilltop edge. B 1. Hibernation site for snakes from both hilltop and valley, limestone outcrop with southwest exposure. B 2. Egg- laying and "nursery" area at east end of quarry. C. "House Field," at head of small valley. D. "Rat Ledge," limestone outcrops at hilltop edge with south exposure. FITCH: A DEMOGRAPHIC STUDY OF THE RINGNECK SNAKE rock quarry, where suitable flat rocks were numerous. In 1966 and 1967 funnel traps were used on a large scale. These were adaptations of the cylindrical wire funnel traps used earlier in population studies of larger kinds of snakes at the Reservation (Fitch, 1951; Clark, 1966). A glass quart far served as the trap body; a funnel of 1/8 inch mesh screen was sol- dered to the screw-top of the jar. These traps were used in combination with drift fences consisting of strips of sheet metal 2 to 6 m long and 25 to 38 cm wide, buried to a depth of at least 5 cm, so that snakes could not readily pass be- neath. A funnel trap was set at each end of the barrier, and traps were generally situated in clumps of grass or other dense vegetation, so that captured animals would not be exposed to direct sunlight. Strips of sheet metal that were left lying in grassy places from time to time were found to have groups of ringneck snakes congregated beneath them. A se- ries of such experiences brought belated realization that formerly pastured grassy fields harbored high populations of ring- neck snakes with densities comparable to those in the rocky upper-slope and hill- top habitats. Subsequently, large num- bers of sheet metal strips and weathered boards were distributed over study areas selected in House Field and Quarry Field, and collectively these objects served as highly effective traps. Success- ful use of these devices as traps de- pended upon proper timing of field work. The snakes were attracted to the metal chiefly in cool weather, when the metal was warmed by sunshine but air and substrate temperatures were lower than the snake's preferenda. However, at most times the metal was uncomfortably hot or cold to the snakes and was avoided. The boards provided better in- sulated hiding places and were used at certain times when the metal strips were unattractive. The boards and metal strips proved to be so effective for cap- ture of the snakes that use of funnel traps was discontinued after 1967. The ringneck snakes captured were processed in the field during the early years of the study, but during most of the study period snakes were brought to the laboratory. Processing consisted of probing for the invaginated hemipenes in the tail base to determine sex and measuring the snout- vent (S-V) length and tail length to the nearest millimeter. For the snout-vent measurement the snake was held against a rigid ruler and gently pulled out straight for several seconds until muscle fatigue caused it to relax momentarily, permitting stretching to the maximum length. The accuracy of measurement was checked in a random sample of 200 adults recaptured within a two-week period — too short an interval for the snake to make measurable growth. Mean deviation from the original meas- urement was 1.52 mm, approximately 0.6 per cent. Snakes captured were individually marked by scale-clipping, in a modifica- tion of the Blanchard and Finster ( 1933 ) system. Three scales were clipped on each snake to attain a unique combina- tion; the left or right end of one of the posterior ventrals was clipped out, also one subcaudal on the left side and one on the right were partly or wholly ex- cised. The subcaudals clipped included numbers 2 to 20 on each side, counting posteriorly from the vent. On each side the count began with the first scale that made contact on or near the midline with a counterpart on the opposite side; smaller scales just behind the vent, which did not extend to the midline, were not included. Snakes have some capacity to regen- erate lost or damaged scales (Conant, 1948) and this capacity seems especially well developed in Diadophis. The scars left by clipped scales often became ob- scure after several years. Regeneration of the scale surface was sometimes so complete that partial fusion along a su- ture or a break in the sequence of pig- mented dots on the subcaudals provided the only clues. Examination of the scars 8 MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATION MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY under a dissecting microscope often was necessary before identification was made. Natural scars on the tail were common and were a potential source of confusion. Bites of small predators such as Blarina brevicauda caused indentations that sometimes were mistaken for those made by clipping scales with scissors. Because of these potential sources of confusion or error, it was necessary to supplement scale-clipping with other means of identification. Such means was provided by the variable pigmentation of the ventral surface. Markings on the posterior ventrals (numbers one to ten anterior to the anal plate) were classi- fied as "bars," "blotches," "spots," and "dots" according to their size and shape. The number and position of such marks on each posterior ventral was recorded. In many instances positive identification was based on the ventral markings when it could not have been derived from the scars of clipped scales alone. Weight was recorded to the nearest one-hundredth of a gram. Laboratory balances were used until 1969 when Oskar Ludi spring scales became avail- able and greatly expedited weighing. Obvious bulges in snakes were palped up to the gullet for identification; and when intact they were removed from the snake for weighing and/or measurement. Reproductive condition was noted. In females of adolescent size, thickening of the cloaca indicative of sexual matu- rity was recorded. A drop of normal saline was pipetted into the cloaca, and a smear was taken and examined for motile sperm under magnification x 60. Mature snakes of both sexes often had great c^uantities of sperm in the cloaca. In the male its presence was considered indicative of breeding condition, and in the female it was considered indicative of recent copulation. Morphology Characters of the local population. — The head scutellation is typically colu- brine (Fig. 2), with nasal divided, loreal small and rhomboidal, 2 preoculars and 2 postoculars on each side, one anterior and one posterior temporal, and 7 supra- labials, the third and fourth in contact with the eye. There are 15 or 17 scale rows, each body scale with an apical pit, anal plate divided; eye with round pupil and golden-brown iris. The following are ratios to snout-vent length in a typ- ical adult male: tail length, 24.50%; head length, 4.38%; body diameter, 2.14%; di- ameter of eye, .63%; length of longest ventrals, .67%; length of longest dorsals, .56%. The teeth are slender and conical, with the following numbers most fre- quent on the bones that are dentigerous: dentary 16 (or 17), maxillary (Fig. 4) 13 (or 14), pterygoid 10 (or 9), palatine 20 (or 21). In the dentary series the anteriormost tooth is relatively small and slender, the second less so and the larg- est are those a little anterior to the mid- dle; farther posteriorly the teeth are progressively smaller and more recurved. Fig. 2. — Head of adult Diadophis piinctattis armji showing scutellation and pattern; top, lateral; center, dorsal; bottom, ventral. FITCH: A DEMOGRAPHIC STUDY OF THE RINGNECK SNAKE 9 Table 1. — Tail Length as Percentage of Snout- Vent Length in Male and Female RiNGNECK Snakes of Different Size Classes. For Each of the Eight Samples N = 25. Size Class Males Females Large adults 22.1 ±: .315 (25.4-20.8) 17.9 ± .201 (19.7-15.3) (males 298-272 mm, females 347-300 mm) Typical adults 23.2 ih .323 (25.9-20.7) 17.9 ± .217 (19.8-15.9) (males 249-240 tum, females 289-270 mm) 2nd year young 21.9 ± .069 (23.0-20.9) 17.3 ± .154 (19.1-15.6) (189-170 mm) 1st year young 20.8 ± .345 (25.2-17.8) 17.1 ± .248 (18.6-15.4) (128-111 mm) with the smallest only about one-third the size of the largest. In the maxillary series the anterior teeth are relatively long, slender and erect, and those far- ther back are stouter and directed more posteriorly. The last two of the series are almost side by side and are stouter and more backward pointed than the others, and they are separated from the next anterior tooth by a space about equal to the length of that tooth. The palatine teeth are small, about half the size of the maxillary and dentaiy teeth, with marked decrease in size posteriorly. Relative tail length is subject to con- siderable individual variation and also is subject to sexual difference and onto- genetic difference. In 200 randomly se- lected individuals with intact tails, tail length varied from 15.3 to 25.9% of snout- vent length ( Table 1 ) . At all ages males have relatively longer tails, and adults of both sexes have relatively longer tails than do young. In males this ontogenetic change in relative tail length is three times as great as in females. In the larg- est males the trend is reversed and rela- tive tail length is a little less than in smaller individuals. There is overlapping between the sexes in relative tail length only in the first-year young ( 12% ) . Trends in size, as indicated by snout- vent length and weight, are shown in Table 2. In this table the figures for the largest adult and the smallest sexually mature snake are based upon single in- dividuals, and hatchling size is based upon 83 young of 21 clutches hatched in the laboratory. All other figures are based upon larger samples, with 100 or more snakes in each. The body color is dark bluish olive dorsally, the head darker than the body. Just behind the head is a pale buffy or dull orange band VA scales wide, edged with black both anteriorly and posteri- Table 2. — Sizes of Male and Female Ringneck Snakes of Different Age Classes in A Local Population Male Female Length S-V (mm) Largest adult 315.0 Average adult 253.6 Young adult (3rd year) 223.0 Smallest sexually mature 168.0 Average 2nd year young (in spring) 184.6 Average 1st year young (in spring) 122.6 Hatchling 109.3 Weight ( grams ) Length S-V Weight (mm) 9.0 5.4 3.9 2.0 2.3 .97 .74 391.0 281.7 243.8 210.0 194.1 127.0 114.1 ( grams ) 7.0 5.0 3.5 2.8 1.05 .81 10 MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATION MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY orly. On the side of the head the sepa- ration of the darker dorsal color from the paler ventral color is accentuated by an irregular black band along the upper parts of the supralabials. The chin is cream-colored or buffy, speckled with black, and gradually brightening to yel- low on the neck and more posteriorly on the ventral surface. The ventral yellow has some orange suffusion which be- comes much more prominent on the tail. Black spots are prominent on the ventral surface, and may be arranged in a fairly regular mid-ventral row or may be paired or irregular. Ventrals usually have black areas in their lateral corners. Fig. 3 shows six types of common ventral pat- terns, but intermediate stages occur, and usually two or more of the types shown are present on the same snake. In a ran- dom sample of 200 snakes mid-ventral spots ( type A ) were most common, with 44.0%, followed by paired spots ( types B and C) with 40.7%, blotches and bars (type F) with 6.9%, irregular marks (type D) with 6.0%, and unmarked (type E) 2.4%. The subcaudals have black in the corners and lack other marks. The hemipenis (Fig. 4) consists of a shaft, and a capitate part which com- prises the distal one-fourth. The capitate part is slightly constricted at its base, slightly expanded and shallowly bilobate, with many large and irregular pitlike depressions (calyces). The shaft, except for the part near the sulcus, is covered with spines which are variable in size and distribution and are thick and Heshy except at the tips. The sulcus spemia- ticus is bifurcate distally. Geographic variation. — In the popu- lation studied, much individual variation was found in characters that have been reported to vary geographically and which are the bases for recognition of the many subspecies of Diadophis punc- tatus. Characters that are notably vari- able are: body size, dorsal color, ventral color, size and shape and distribution of black markings on ventral surface, pres- ence and width of neck ring, black mark- FiG. 3. — Six types of ventral patterns common in ringneck snakes of The University of Kansas Natural History Reservation. on facial region, number, of dorsal scale rows, number of ventrals and sub- mg FITCH: A DEMOGRAPHIC STUDY OF THE RINGNECK SNAKE 11 caudals and number of supralabials. The population studied is centrally located in the geographic range of the species, and is intermediate relative to other popula- tions in some of its characters but is near the extreme in some others. In body size the snakes studied are near the minimum for the species. Popu- lations in the northeastern states, the far West, and especially those in Utah and Arizona, are much larger, up to about twice the linear dimensions of the Kan- sas snakes. In some regions, especially the far western states, the snakes are more slender than those from Kansas, which appear relatively short and stubby. The dark dorsal color is slaty in some populations but may be suffused with brown, green or blue. In some populations the ventral color is best de- scribed as yellow, with relatively little E E Fig. 4 — Above, hemipenis of Diadophis punc- tatus; below, lateral view of left maxillary of Diadophis punctatus. change from body to tail. In others, es- pecially those in which the tail-spiralling response is highly developed, the under- side of the tail is coral red. Scales are in 15 or 17 rows in the Kansas snakes and some others. Over much of the range 15 rows are the normal number, but 17 is the normal number in some western populations in which body size is large. In some other western populations which are notably slender-bodied, scale rows vary from 15 to 13. In the population studied, there is normally a neck ring at least 1/2 scale rows wide, but in eastern and some far western populations the ring is narrower and /or broken on the middorsal line, and in southwestern pop- ulations it is absent. In the Kansas snakes the red or orange ventral color is confined to the ventrals and subcaudals, but in most more western populations the ventral coloration encroaches onto the dorsal scale rows and may cover the first two on each side. The Kansas snakes have seven pairs of supralabials but some other populations have eight. In the Kansas snakes the black marks of the ventral surface tend to be irregular but in the southeastern populations the mark- ings are regular and symmetrical with a half-moon shaped central spot on each ventral scale, and in some far western populations the ventral markings are normally absent. The number of ventrals in Diadophis punctatus arniji ranges from 142 to 185, and, for the species as a whole, from 126 to 239 (Wright and Wright, 1957:159). The numbers of ventrals in females ex- ceed the numbers in males by from 10 to 20 in different populations. In general, far western populations have more ven- trals than D. p. arniji and eastern popu- lations have fewer. The subcaudals num- ber from 30 to 79 and there are usually 6 to 8 more in males than in females within any population. HABITAT As a transcontinental species Dia- dophis punctatus occurs in most of the 12 MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATION MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY major biomes of North America. In the region of my study it occurs in a variety of habitats but is especially associated with the ecotone between deciduous for- est and prairie. Under original condi- tions the transition from forest to prairie was sharp and clearly defined. Under modern conditions woodlots, groves, old fields and pastures provide a spectrum of combinations of the two main types of vegetation with habitats that are favor- able for the snakes. Ringneck snakes are present on all parts of the Natural History Reservation. However, this area, having a variety of topographic features, past treatments, and plant associations, is unequally used by them (Figs. 5, 6). The transition from low to high numbers reveals the combination of ecological factors re- quired by the species. There is some seasonal shift between habitats, and in some situations where the snakes use loose surface objects for shelter, they are more readily found than where such shelters are lacking, even though the lat- ter situations may have more snakes. Subject to these constraints, habitats rep- resented on the Reservation have been found to have ringneck snakes, in ap- proximately the following order of abun- dance : ( 1 ) Old hilltop pastures domi- nated by Bromiis inennis, with thickets, clumps and scattered small trees of Cor- nus drummondii, Mains ioensis, Madura pomifera, Gleditsia triacanthos, Ulmtis americanus and others. Bottomland pas- tures with similar plant assemblages are slightly less favorable habitat for the snakes, perhaps because they are on the average cooler and damper than the hill- tops. (2) Hilltop edges with limestone outcrops and with loose rock strewn over adjacent upper slopes, and with brush and intervening open spaces. South- facing hilltops that are relatively open and have an abundance of flat rocks are preferred over those that face north or are heavily shaded with trees or brush, lack loose ground objects providing hid- ing places. (3) Woodland; well-drained situations, especially south-facing with an open canopy and little underbrush, are favorable, whereas soggy soil and deep shade under unbroken leaf canopy are unfavorable. (4) Prairie, but gener- ally in association with such features as gullies, rock outcrops and patches of brush, indicating that extensive areas of level, homogeneous grassland are little used. (5) Riparian situations along the edges of intermittent streams or artificial ponds. Especially in dry weather mois- ture renders these situations attractive, and eroded banks, exposed tree roots, rocks, and accumulations of drift provide hiding places. (6) Old fields, but only after dense ground vegetation has be- come established, providing shelter. In summary the snakes are not lim- ited to any one habitat, but occur in various types of terrain and vegetation. Some of the chief requirements are soil that is slightly damp but not wet or soggy, abundant shelter in the form of a surface mat of dead vegetation and /or loose objects such as flat rocks, boards or trash, and screening shrubs or trees with leaf canopies sparse enough to permit abundant sunshine to reach the ground. BEHAVIOR Undisturbed ringneck snakes are rarely seen despite their great abun- dance, because they tend to keep under cover. However, over the 26-year span of my observations at the Reservation, many have been found on a county road that crosses the area or on the driveway between the county road and residence (.5 km). Such a snake, when first seen, was usually motionless and would re- main so even when closely approached by a person on foot, or when an auto- mobile passed over it. However, after a pause, especially if actually touched, it would make violent wriggling move- ments to gain a place of concealment. In a highly excited individual there was sometimes a lateral lashing of the tail as the snake crawled. In all instances the snakes on the road or driveway were FITCH: A DEMOGRAPHIC STUDY OF THE RINGNECK SNAKE 13 Fig. 5. — Upper, summer habitat of high population of Diadophis in "House Field," with dense, low vegetation, scattered trees and brush, July 1974. Lower, nursery area, with sunny, open slope, loose rock, and deep crevices from former blasting, at abandoned quarry where many females congregated for egg-laying; July 1974. 14 MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATION MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY i ,r. V:' >^:. V l^'iG. 6. — Upper, liibeniation area at abandoned quarry, with sunny, rock-strewn slope and fissured limestone outcrop in background; metal strip in foregroimd was attractive to snakes when warmed by sunshine in cool weather; November, 1973. Lower, "Quarry Field," providing optimum summer habitat for the snakes, with dense herbaceous vege- tation, interspersed with trees and clinups of brush. FITCH: A DEMOGRAPHIC STUDY OF THE RINGNECK SNAKE 15 found by day, sometimes in bright sun- liglit, leading to the conclusion that they are mainly diurnal; but, because of small size and dark coloration, they would not have been readily detected at night. Ernst ( 1962 ) observed nocturnal activity in Maryland. Behavioral thermoregulation usually involves contacting sunshine-warmed ob- jects rather than exposure to direct sun- light. The snakes use flat rocks, and in altered habitats use boards and metal strips. In a horizontal flat coil, the snake has its dorsal surface in contact with the undersurface of the shelter, and may be warmed to above ambient air temper- ature. When body temperature is suffi- ciently raised, the snake withdraws from contact with the sheltering object and nestles in a depression, retreats into a hole or crevice, or leaves the vicinity. The combination of a dark, almost uniform, somberly colored dorsal surface and a brightly colored ventrum com- bines the advantage of cryptic coloration with the capacity for flashing a startling display, or making a show of sematic colors. Musk with semi-liquid feces and uric acid is voided by a snake that is captured, frightened or injured. A snake struggling to escape writhes vigorously, smearing its captor and its own body with malodorous voided substances. Si- multaneously it coils the tail in a tight spiral, elevated so that the coral red undersurface is conspicuously displayed (Figs. 7, 8). Many genera of snakes, both venom- ous and non-venomous, have tail displays (Greene, 1973) that may serve to warn natural enemies of venomous or distaste- ful qualities. However, tail-spiralling is peculiar to Diadophis. The display varies in the position of the tail, the number of coils in the spiral, and the kind and de- gree of stimulation required. Myers (1965) has shown that the response varies geo- graphically, and that it is correlated with intensity of ventral coloring. Those pop- ulations in which the ventral surface is all yellow, with no contrast between tail and body, show no spiralling response, or have it only feebly developed. Those populations that have yellow pigmenta- tion of the body grading into bright coral red on the tail have the spiralling response well developed. My own ex- perience has been mostly with Diadophis punctatus arnyi of northeastern Kansas, in which the display is relatively well developed, but my limited experience with the subspecies amahilis and occi- dentalis in California and Oregon has indicated that in these the response is stronger and more easily triggered than in the Kansas snakes. At the Reservation in October, 1973, one hundred recently captured ringneck snakes were tested in the laboratory for tail spiralling response. Each in turn was grasped at mid-body with metal tongs, removed from the container where it had been burrowing in decaying wood, and released in a large enamel pan. Grasping the snakes and releasing them in an open place excited them and often evoked spiralling, but if the response did not occur after about five seconds, the snake was tapped on the tip of the snout as further inducement. If the spiralling still did not occur after several taps, the snake was held down against the sub- strate. If the spiralling did not occur even after several seconds of such re- straint, a final stimulus was applied in the form of a light pinch on the rear of the body with sharp-pointed forceps. When released 12 of the snakes coiled their tails with no further stimulus (in four of these the coil was loose, forming a loop rather than a spiral). Two more coiled their tails when tapped; 46 others did so when held down, but in six of them the tail was merely looped, and in 12 others the spiral was imperfect or loose. Fourteen coiled their tails when pinched (eight of these formed a loop). The remaining 26 snakes did not coil their tails in response to any of the stimuli. However, responses were un- doubtedly conditioned somewhat by handling of the snakes in the field at the 16 MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATION MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY Fig. 7. — Upper, adult female ringneck snake and one of her brood of four, illustrating relatively large size of hatchlings; August 1974. Middle, adult female and her clutch of four eggs; July 1974. Lower, clutch of three eggs, one normal (left), one unusually elongate (liehind), and one with right angle bend, July 1974. FITCH: A DEMOGRAPHIC STUDY OF THE RINGNECK SNAKE 17 Fig. 8. — Upper, adult female ringneck snake after capture, coiling tail and exposing brightly-colored undersurface in "warning" display. Lower, adult male after handling and release, with tail elevated and coiled in tight spiral displaying bright ventral colors. Photo by Joseph T. Collins. 18 MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATION MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY time of capture, and by repeated stimuli from contact with other snakes when many were in the same container. In April 1974, 100 more snakes were tested in the field when they were first uncovered, by holding each down mo- mentarily and noting its responses. Ninety-five spiralled their tails, another held its tail in a loop, and only four failed to show any tail coiling. The snakes tested were presumably a random sample and nearly half (48) were adult males. However, the spiralling response seems to be equally well developed in adults and in first year young, and in both sexes. Tail spiralling is likely to have evolved as a defense against diurnal predators having color vision (especially birds), and the musk is sufficient deter- rent to reinforce the display. It may be speculated that in parts of the geographic range where tail spiralling is not de- veloped, other kinds of predators that are nocturnal, or lack color vision, or are not deterred by the musk, are most im- portant. Although trailing by olfaction is a prominent aspect of the behavior, and ringneck snakes tend to aggregate, social relationships are primitive, and associ- ations between individuals are ephem- eral. As in most other snakes, there is no territoriality, and aggressive behavior is rare in intraspecific interactions. How- ever, when many individuals are depos- ited in the same collecting sack, attacks may occur. In a group of several dozen that have been bagged together, there may be several interlocking pairs, either young or adults and of either sex. In my experience the contestants are always of approximately equal size. The upper in- dividual has the face and muzzle of the lower one in its mouth, while the lower one holds the lower jaw of its opponent, and because of the sharp, recurved teeth, the snakes are not readily disengaged. Anderson (1965) stated that the odor of disgorged earthworms smeared on the snakes' bodies caused them to attack each other, with cannibalism sometimes ensuing. Possibly this is the sole basis for the observed attacks. TEMPERATURE RELATIONSHIPS Compared with most other reptiles of northeastern Kansas, the ringneck snake has a relatively long season of activity, averaging about 213 days and excluding only that part of the year in which freezing regularly occurs. Behavorial thermoregulation allows it to maintain a body temperature more nearly optimum than ambient temperatures. Small size and slender habitus pemiit rapid adjust- ment of temperature with little effort on the part of the snake. The snakes occasionally bask in direct sunlight, but usually remain concealed and elevate body temperatures by con- tact with sun-warmed objects, such as flat rocks, logs, strips of bark, leaf litter, and mats of dead herbaceous vegetation. Artificial objects, including boards, scraps of sheet metal, plastic or tarpaper, are often preferred. The snake lies with its dorsal surface in contact with the overlying object. Body temperatures averaged 26.1° (11.7= to 34.4°) for 129 snakes found beneath surface objects. In 109 instances body temperature exceeded air temper- ature and the difference ranged from zero to 13.6°. Only nine per cent of the snakes (11) had body temperatures that were lower than nearby air temperatures. For 37 snakes found in the open, body temperature averaged 26.6° ± .62 (18.2° to 33.3°). Air temperatures ranged from 16.2° to 30.0° at the times these snakes were found, and for the entire group body temperature averaged 3.7° above air temperature. Only four of the 37 were cooler than the air. When air temperature approaches or exceeds their preferendum, the snakes tend to stay under shelter, but when air temperature is relatively low, the oppor- tunity to bask in sunshine provides in- centive for them to move into the open. For instance on 20 April 1955, when air FITCH: A DEMOGRAPHIC STUDY OF THE RINGNECK SNAKE 19 • / • / • • • / UJ — ) ?30 • .••• ^ ■ • / • q: •*» UJ Q. •2^ • ^y - UJ ' • / h- ► • / / >- Q O QD i'°\ / / • - / • 1 1 20 25 30 AIR TEMPERATURE Fig. 9. — Body temperatures of Diadophis ptinc- tatus and adjacent air temperatures (degrees Celsius), in snakes found in the open. Body temperature is usually a little higher than air temperature and ranges from 19° to 33° in snakes that are active. temperature was 16.3°, a basking snake had body temperature of 30.3°. Below 16° the snakes do not venture into the open, but still are responsive to vertical temperature gradients, moving upward to contact sun-warmed objects, or down- ward to escape surface chilling. Figures 9 and 10 show body temperatures and nearby air temperatures for snakes that were in the open and those that were beneath surface objects. The majority of snakes found active on the surface were between 25° and 27° or between 29° and 31°. The majority of those found under shelter had temperatures of 26° to 30°. The highest body temperature, 34.4°, was of a gravid female in June, as were those of several other records ex- ceeding 30°. Seemingly the females while carrying eggs have a strong ten- dency to bask, and perhaps their prefer- endum is slightly above that of other individuals. The maximum body temperature re- corded was 34.4°, but the snakes are able to tolerate considerably higher temper- atures, at least for brief periods. Experi- mental exposures demonstrated that for Diadophis the critical maximum is ap- proximately 41° and the critical mini- mum is approximately freezing (Fitch, 1956, 1965). Although the lowest body temperature recorded was 11.7°, it is certain that the snakes tolerate lower temperatures during hibernation. Win- ter temperatures in hibernacula from .3 to .8 m beneath the surface are usually well within the range 0° to 10°. SEASONAL SCHEDULE On the Reservation ringneck snakes have been found in every month except January and February, and only one has been observed in December. Ordinarily the snakes become active in the third or fourth week of March and retire to hi- bernation in late October or early No- vember. Some emerge later and retire earlier. Even those that are potentially active may be immobilized for days at a time near the beginning and ending of their season of activity when weather is inclement. 10 20 AIR TEMPERATURE Fig. 10. — Body temperature of Diadophis punc- tatus and adjacent air temperatures (degrees Celsius), in snakes found under shelter. Larg- est circles each represent three records, medium circles each represent two, and smallest circles each represent one. Body temperatures are concentrated at 25° and 30°. 20 MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATION MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY Probably some individuals remain in the areas where they have been active and hibernate in such shelters as are available there, including the tunnels of voles (Microtus), moles (Scaloptis) and probably cicada nymphs (Tihicen, Magi- cicada). Others make trips of hundreds of meters to hilltop rock outcrops where there are deep crevices that provide more secure hibernacula. Emergence from hibernation in spring occurs over several weeks and is controlled by tem- perature that depends not only on weather but on the location and depth of the hibernaculum. Fall retirement into hibernation also spans several weeks for the population as a whole, judging from the dwindling numbers of snakes found active in late October and early November. Adult males seem to emerge some- what earlier than females; anyhow they arc much more in evidence at first. There is a shift from rock outcrops to more open situations during April, and some shuffling of populations occurs as indi- viduals that have hibernated together scatter and mingle with individuals from relatively remote hibernation sites. Ovarian follicles, minute at the time of emergence from hibernation, enlarge rapidly in early May, and ovulation takes place in late May or June. Sloughing occurs in most of the population in late April or early May. Beginning in early May the snakes become increasingly se- cretive and subterranean, and by mid- summer they are rarely found. Egglay- ing occurs in late June or early July, and hatching in the last week of August or in September. Also in September a com- bination of cooling weather and heavy rains cause the snakes to reappear in abundance in superficial situations where they have not been in evidence since spring. In late September and October there are population shifts back to the vicinity of hibernacula. Table 3 shows an incomplete phe- nology for ringneck snakes on the Reser- vation. The first tabular row shows both mean dates for various events in the annual cycle and mean sizes (length S-V) of first-year young. The subse- quent rows are for specific years and show deviations in days from the mean date, or deviation in millimeters from the mean length. ASSOCIATED ANIMALS On the Reservation and nearby areas in northeastern Kansas many species of animals are associated with the ringneck snake, and elsewhere in its geographic ranee the snake interacts with other, quite different communities. In the area of my study, earthworms were the ani- mals most important in its ecology, providing its main food source. Allolo- hophora caJiginosa is much more impor- tant than all other kinds combined, in terms both of the frequency with which Diadophis interacts with it and the bio- mass of food that it provides. This is a medium-sized, stubby-bodied, tan-col- ored earthworm that is native in Europe (Dr. W. Murchie, pers. comm.) and in- troduced into North America, where it is now widespread and abundant, occur- ring in various habitats. It is especially abundant in damp soil under flat rocks in open woodland or woodland edge in the same sorts of situations that are fa- vored by the snakes. Other associated animals may be grouped roughly into those that affect the ringneck snake indirectly by exten- sive alteration of the general habitat, tliose that prey upon it, those that are potential competitors for food, those that themselves are potential food sources, and those that are essentially neutral in the ecology of the snake. In the first category are livestock (mainly cattle) and deer, which alter the vegetation and soil by their feeding, trampling and droppings. They may often kill snakes by accidental trampling. Also, they may improve the habitat by removing dense vegetation and creating open areas where the snakes have more opportunity to bask. Areas that are subjected to FITCH: A DEMOGRAPHIC STUDY OF THE RINGNECK SNAKE 21 a o a u Plh PS < u PS > o z o H > H en U PS o H en Z en < Z < O !h H »-t en z ;^ a H H < s c 3 b O O O >J o z u CO M i-l CQ < M B 3 O >H o > I e/3 a « ►2^ ■* ►J Ji t^ e/2 (N rH Ml *..s Ot .sj= '^n, CO Vi «N 4-1 'O t« flJ 4) S S £ ^ o S u S OX! CO CO c-Hdci + + I + + + + + + + t~ 00 CO d ooincDcD-*cq>— loooq '^ci-HCDc^icooocvid c>i + + I+ + + + + + <£> C^ 00 + + + + ^ 00 O CM l> in -H CD 05 + I + + + + Tf< Tfl t^ 00 (M I + I I + o + CD CD CD d in a> o o o 1— 1 -^ — 1 t- ^ CO I + I + O ^ CO CO 1—1 + I + cq,— iin-^in'— icDi— iTt^ a z o u u Q Z < H en CS CO < o z o (^ o c« H O a o u o en S H O Z U z PQ < O CO CD 'X iX 'X o I— 05 iX en CD 05 iX 00 05 iX l^ 0) CD -w (35 "55 —I o ti & in G 05 O 'X "^ o t^ 00 CO ^ ci CO +1 p oq CO +1 CO XT in CO l-H r-( '^ t- (N 00 O 00 a; CO CO +1 II in in d CO +1 o o d C<1 Ol CM Ol CO in O '^ tT .-h ■-H oi +1 +1 00 Ol 05 t^ CO X -1* CO (M ^H -H (M O ^H CO ^ r- TT TT o — I oi Ol oi +1 00 t- CO ^ o in Ol CO 05 00 + 1 +1 +1 +1 •—I CO 00 in ^ t- CO -H CO CO CO "^ CO Ol in I> 00 ^ CO II +1 q ^ CO c^ — ( Ol ^ Ol +1 +1 p Ol -^ oi Ol Ol in Ol » o 00 ^-^ i-H oi +1 +1 CD in ^ in in CO o 00 00 Ol 01 p p CO ^ in +1 II +1 p O; t-; CTJ oi ai Ol CO Ol Tf O --H in 05 CO 0 00 in 01 00 oj •— i " oi II II II p p p ^ oi d Ol Ol CO m o Oi rr CO CO 1—1 CD II II in CO CO t- Ol Ol ^ oi II II p p in CO O Ol o Ol Ol CO II CO CO 00 in CO oi II in ai CO CO 1— 1 Ol Ol o "^ in CO II II II in CD o CO I— 1 d d o 1 — 1 oq 1— ( CO CO Ol o CO 00 in CO oi oi II II II II o o m in 00 00 I— t ai 00 1— 1 in 00 1— 1 CO >— 1 GO CD in Ol in CO CO Ol Ol O in 00 CO in . — 1 o o Ol I— 1 1 — ( 1— 1 oi oi II II II II II . — 1 m Ol o in o ^ CO t^ in 00 00 OD CO 00 05 Ol CO CO Ol 1-H -* in CO CO t-; Ol oi oi TP II II II Ol Ol t- t- t- r- Ol ^H 05 Ol Ol 1— I o o o ^_ p p CO oi CO II II II 00 p ^ d '^' 00 i> i^ t- CO CO I— I cq +1 oq 00 Ol CO oq oq +1 05 CO Ol in +1 CO CO o Ol O 05 l-H CO T-H f-H l-H Ol Ol in l^ 00 00 C35 l-H T-H l-H l-H 1— ( 1— ( 1— ( r-H i-H oq o in l-H in 05 t^ CO Ol CO o in CO 05 05 l-H CO 1—1 t- Ol 05 CO CO 05 in l-H CO f-H CO '^ in in oq p Ol m Ol Ol O o 02 in in ■<* d ^ d d d in in d CD CO oi d Ol ■-H Ol Ol Ol 't* ^ t- 00 00 00 00 00 f— ( 1—1 1— 1 1 — 1 l-H ^H 1 — 1 ^H ^H 1—1 1—1 '~' 1 — ( 5 4-> a C/D O o r-i a < v. a < »rH c ! 1 Oj 1— I 2> a a Oj CD CJ o o O CJ a < a < 0) C 1—1 w ^ >> ^. >. ^> "G >. _>. ^ >, ^ 25 oi <3j 0; 1; ij 0; c5 OJ 0; 5 Cj OJ 0; 5 S ^ cS CD *1 FITCH: A DEMOGRAPHIC STUDY OF THE RINGNECK SNAKE 35 hatchling size is best determined from young hatched in captivity. Young were hatched from 21 clutches in 1965/1967, 1969, 1970 and 1974; 50 males averaged 109.3 di .91 mm and 33 females averaged 114.1 ± 1.22 mm. Most series of young collected in the field averaged several per cent larger than these laboratory hatched young, and pre- sumably they had made some growth between the time of hatching and the time of capture. Tables 7 and 8 show mean lengths of young males and young females at biweekly intervals for six different years, and for a composite of 11 earlier years when samples were generally smaller. Each vertical column in the tables traces the growth of one cohort of young snakes from the time of their appearance soon after hatching to an age of about 21 months in late spring. The months of July, August, and November through early March are not included because no samples of snakes were obtained then. Many other biweekly intervals in Sep- tember, October and March through June of specific years lack data because no snakes were found, or samples were inadequately small. Only samples of ten or more are included. In some instances average length in a sample is slightly less than for a sample of the same cohort in an earlier period. Such aberrations are due to chance and to the fact that successive samples in- volved different groups of individuals. In most instances slight gain is indicated for each biweekly interval, but the aver- age increment was small in cool weather just before hibernation and just after emergence. The following figures repre- sent average increments for the several annual samples: late September to early October, 3.63%; early October to late October, 1.32%; late March to early April, 0.48%; early April to late April,' 2.08%; late April to early May, 2.16%; early May to late May, 2.72%; late May to early June, 3.29%. Growth is fastest in sum- mer, but few snakes were obtained dur- ing late June, July, August and early September. The second-year snakes have increased by an average of 46.7% (males) or 49.8% (females) over the length of first-year young at the time of their emergence from hibernation. In Tables 7 and 8 some annual co- horts of young are definitely accelerated or retarded compared with others at the same stages in their history. For exam- ple, the young hatched in 1973 were larger in April 1974 than the April young of other years. Development may be delayed or hastened by early or late re- tirement into hibernation, but such early differences tend to become smaller or disappear before the end of the first year. Another aspect of growth brought out by Tables 7 and 8 is difference be- tween the sexes. In every sample of first-year snakes in which there were 20 or more of each sex, the females aver- aged larger. In 13 such series, the fe- males were 101.2 per cent to 104.7 per cent of male length, with a combined average of 102.9 per cent. In 11 corre- sponding series of second-year young, the females were 100.5 to 107.8 per cent of male length, for an average of 104.2 per cent. Figure 14 is based on the snout-vent lengths of first- and second-year young distributed over the year except for No- vember through early March, and July and August, when too few snakes were found for an adequate sample. It shows that the females are consistently larger than males and that young make rapid growth in their first few weeks. How- ever, growth slows with the advent of cooler weather in autumn. A high pro- portion of all first-year young are be- tween 120 and 130 mm in length, and the means for both sexes are usually within this range from August through the autumn and spring until May. Those sampled in March and early April are only slightly smaller than those sampled in early May. From late April to early September young make rapid growth, increasing from about 130 mm to about 36 MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATION MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY 180 mm; then, during their second au- tumn, winter and spring gains are rela- tively slight. An arbitrary dividing line between second- and third-year snakes is set be- tween 214 and 215 mm in males and between 223 and 224 mm in females, on the basis of the gains made by marked individuals. Some snakes seem to suffer little or no stunting from the effects of processing, and most have overcome the effects within a month. Those recaptured after the lapse of an entire growing season or a longer interval were assumed to have made normal growth, the initial stunting being a relatively minor factor. Figure 14, showing the growth curve through the tenth year in females and the eleventh year in males, is based upon the records of all marked individuals recaptured after a growing season or a longer interval. Since little growth oc- curs from September through April, and since nearly all the records are from spring and fall, each record was assigned to a particular age-class, with disregard for fractional years, although the actual age of those classed as two-year-olds, for example, ranged from 24 months to about 33 months. Also, the figure in- cludes data from the series of unmarked young that formed discrete age classes at the time of hatching, and in the fall and spring following hatching. The two- year-old and three-year-old classes are based upon recaptured individuals that were marked as hatchlings. The remain- ing age-classes are based partly on those marked as hatchlings, but also on those marked as second- and third-year young and recaptured as adults. Because second-year young overlap in size both AGE IN YEARS Fig. 14. — Lengths of male and female ringneck snakes marked eady in life and recaptured. In each series mean, standard error, standard deviation, range, and sample size are shown. Growth is rapid in the first three years but is slow in the older snakes. Females average larger and plot above males. FITCH: A DEMOGRAPHIC STUDY OF THE RINGNECK SNAKE 37 < a Q Z o u Q Z < H s z < o z o o H K o K O U [^ o X H O z w hJ z ■ < 00 u 1-1 < CO 05 iX cq I- 05 'X 02 iX o Ir- as iX CD CD 05 'X 00 CO 05 iX tr- OJ ee -w 02 'S o 1 a t- r^ in o> 5 — I CO I— I ^ t- CM CD 00 TP 03 rH (M_ ^ oi CO c CO ^ CO Tt^ (M ■— I 05 p CO C<1 1— I I— I o-i II II II ^ lO CO CO d 00 (M CO (M CO CO in oi II o O cq cq CO -^ Tt< -* CO o CD cq CD O I — I ^H 1— i c^i II II t- p p 1-J CD 1>^ cq cq -"iH in o CO CD CO 00 cq cq cq coo in-^cocDcot-t- p in p 00 p p in c] cq 00 -^ CO CO C7> '-f' in -r CD cq cq cq cq ci CO CO ^ ^ in 00 1—1 CD in II II t- o in 05 d 00 cq II 00 CO 00 o II 05 i> c^; in 1— I CD o CO Tt i> cq CO 1— I ^ ^ o ^ CO t- in oi t- o t- t> c-1 o in cq c ^ cq cq cq tp II II II P TT i-H cq' d r-! 00 CO 05 cq 05 oi II 00 CO 05 o CO cq II o 00 05 in in cq in O 00 — ; d CO 05 00 Cl 1> ^ ^ CD ^ CO in p CD -* oi co' d CO C35 05 05 05 •*^ •*~* p a o O o 1^ >, 2> o^ ^H 10 xt< ^ oq o 00 i> -* ^ 01 o o o O CO o o O t- Tt^ 01 t^ CO in ^ 00 O 1> CO t^ a> 00 ^ 0000 .M .W 4-> 4-* O CD CO CO CO CO CD t^ in 00 '^ in CO I— I CO in in a a < < o cj .2 S S >> CD t- J.H CO CD « 2 2 •c -d a a < < I I o o -f 00 00 t- O 00 t- CO ^ in CO o '^ 00 CO t- c^l O CD CO CO CO in 01 000 CO CO t- 00 CO CO 00 CO CO CO CO CO CO c 3 >x >, 0 >> >^ ^ ^ 0 0" 0 0 0 CO CO D (U ;s CO CO CO CD c c i CD CD . — ( f— 4 I—' 3 0) I-H 1— 1 T. 'd >. >. 0 4-> 'd 't- a a rt 03 CJ a a <: < s ;s 0 < < 4 s a ii in in a ^ 't (73 '-' ^ 3 a a bC < << < -c ^ 7 o o CO o CT) 05 O S S in CD t~ CO CO CD 05 ro C35 FITCH: A DEMOGRAPHIC STUDY OF THE RINGNECK SNAKE 43 Quarry Field. Calculated figures for population density ranged from 719 to 1849 per hectare, with a mean of 1266 per hectare for all seven calculations combined. Individuals are long-lived, and year-to-year variation in reproduc- tive success would not be sufficient to bring about the fluctuations which must be caused by biased or inadequately small samples. The highest and lowest figures are probably far from the mark. Rapid seasonal changes in kind and amount of activity and in the ratios of sex- and age-groups in samples hinders census and prevents eff^ective use of re- finements of the capture-recapture index, such as have been proposed in the "Hayne Method" and the "Jolly Method." A crude capture-recapture index does not provide a precise measure of the population, as has been demonstrated by several investigators. Nevertheless, in this instance, and with secretive animals in general, it does provide better infor- mation about numbers than do direct counts, and at least indicates the order of magnitude of the population. It sug- gests that in favorable habitat population densities of ringneck snakes are often between 1000 and 1500 per hectare. It cannot be stated with any degree of assurance whether the census figures obtained tend to err on the low side or the high side. Even the lowest census figure, of 719 snakes per hectare, would seem excessively high for most kinds of vertebrates, but all evidence suggests that Diadophis pinwtatiis actually does attain high densities. The methods of obtaining samples, by returning regu- larly to certain favored spots to turn sheltering objects or to check live-traps, would tend to favor recapture of certain localized individuals and would increase the ratio of recaptures to new captures, resulting in an erroneously low census figure. On the other hand, wandering tendencies of some individuals, which might leave the study area after being marked, with replacement by newcom- ers, would result in an erroneously low recapture ratio and calculation of a fig- ure for the population that is too high. COMPOSITION OF THE POPULATION Age structure. — Age structure of the adult population was calculated after analysis of the records of individuals marked while young and recaptured as adults (Figs. 14-19, Tables 11-14). These records, combined, show that length is highly correlated with age, so that each individual may be assigned to a most probable age group on the basis of its measurements. Within each age group lengths vary over a wide range but tend to form normal curves, with a clustering of records near the mean and progres- sively fewer in successive stages of de- viation from the mean. Each age group exceeds younger age groups in mean length, but successive annual increments become progressively smaller. Samples are smallest for the relatively old snakes, so that the trends of growth and survival become increasingly obscure. The graph in Figure 14 shows some inconsistencies in the older age groups; for instance ten-year-old males in the sample averaged slightly larger ( 274.5 ± 1.84 mm S-V) than eleven-year-olds (273.0 ±2.10). Such irregularities may result from inclusion of occasional stunted in- dividuals or those of unusually acceler- ated growth. Recognizing that growth continues in adults, but becomes pro- gressively slower with increasing age, and that there is a consistent difference in sizes of the sexes at any given age, the growth curve has been adjusted by slight alterations as shown in Table 14. The table indicates that the annual re- duction from any age class to the next older class is consistently between 20 and 30 per cent, and averages 23.4 per cent for males and 26.8 per cent for fe- males. For example, the 1458 first-year males make up 25.2 per cent of the en- tire sample of 5814 males and the 92 males in the size range (275-277 mm) typical of eleventh year individuals make 44 MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATION MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY Table 11. — Composition of a Population of 9162 Diadophis punctatus Captured and Marked on the Reservation, 1958-1969. Number Size Range Number of Size Range Total Male to of Males of Males Females of Females Number Female Ratio Adults 3436 Second-year young __ 920 First-year young __._ 1458 Total 5814 215-351 1851 221-392 5416 1.85 to 1 147-214 513 160-220 1444 1.79 to 1 90-146 984 85-159 2552 1.48 to 1 90-351 3348 85-392 9162 1.73 to 1 up 23.7 per cent of the snakes that are of this size or larger (presumably more than 10 years old). Non-age-specific annual mortality of approximately one- fourth for both males and females is implied by the figures. Incidentally the figures show a gradual increase in the sexual difference in size, with females averaging 109 per cent of male length in newly matured third-year snakes, but increasing to 112.0 per cent in the eighth- year group and 115.0 per cent in the 14th year group. Although any individual can be as- signed to a "most probable" age on the basis of size alone, there is no certainty that such allocations are correct. The chances that such assignments will err by a year or more are increased greatly in the old snakes, in which any one age class includes individuals that cover a wide range of size. Behavior differs between the sexes and between young and adults so that most field samples are probably subject to some bias, with certain classes better represented than others. Table 11 di- vides the population into six classes: adult males ( third year and older), adult females (third year and older), first-year males and females, and second-year males and females. The table includes the 9162 snakes caught over a 12-year- period, when those captured were indi- vidually marked and released. Recap- tures are not included. These snakes were not all contemporaneous; rather, the 12-year interval spanned many gen- erations, with constantly changing ratios of the sexes and of age groups. How- ever, all are here combined to represent - llJ _J Q_ N 80 214 353 264 483 609 474 369 578694 1174537 318 883 1067 332 733 381 785 < 70 - C/) 60 - u. n O 50 - III o 40 - < t: 30 n — I •■ r UJ o ■20 ^ r (—1 n n T r- ■: on -\ ■"1 ::;•; _ >:- 1 ^ LlJ - 10 S I " ^ ■■ ^ ■: :^ T- v :': :; •:■ O. I i-il l:iil 1 p 1 1 1 i,M ij-l 1 1,^ 1 M i i M :• :.••• I960 1965 1970 1975 Fig. 17. — Percentages of adults (solid columns), second-year young (shaded columns), and first-year young (open columns) in annual spring population samples from The University of Kansas Natural History Reservation and nearby areas over an 18-year period. FITCH: A DEMOGRAPHIC STUDY OF THE RINGNECK SNAKE 45 one population in this composite, mini- mizing the seasonal and year-to-year differences that characterize the smaller samples. In general the samples repre- sent either fall or spring in the pause between the summer growth periods; therefore, there are discrete annual age groups and in the younger snakes there are fairly distinct size groups. The 3436 adult males make up 39 per cent of the total in Table 11 and are much better represented than any of the other live classes. For example, the adult male to adult female ratio is 1.85 to 1. However, Table 12 shows that this ratio changes throughout the season of activ- Table 12. — Changing Sex Ratio of Adult Diadophis punctatus Throughout Season of Acttvity. Time Total Number Number period Sample ! of males of females 16-31 March 285 182(63.9%) 103(36.1%) 1-15 April 1291 927(71.9%) 364(28.1%) 16-30 April 1187 818(68.9%) 369(31.1%) 1-15 May 939 662(70.5%) 277(29.5%) 16-31 May 509 323(63.4%) 186(36.6%) 1-15 June 351 191(45.5%) 160(54.5%) 16-30 June 297 90(30.5%) 207(69.5%) 1-15 July 83 24(29.0%) ,59(71.0%) 16-31 July 50 26(52.0%) 24(48.0%) 1-15 August 57 23(40.4%) 34(59.6%) 16-31 August 79 ,50(63.3%) 29(36.7%) 1-15 September 288 220(76.4%) 68(23.6%) 16-30 September 667 500(74.8%) 167(25.2%) 1-15 October 560 385(68.7%) 175(31.3%) 16-31 October 268 141(52.6%) 127(47.4%) 1-15 November 18 11(61.2%) 7(38.8%) ity, with females constituting only 23.6 per cent ( 1 to 4.24 males ) in the early September sample of adults but increas- ing to 71.0 per cent of the early July sample. Throughout the spring months, when the snakes are found in greatest numbers, females comprise less than 40 per cent of adult samples, and often less than 30 per cent. In the hot weather of June and July, the snakes are much harder to find. Samples are small then but the ratio of females rises. These fe- males are gravid and their relative con- spicuousness seems to be correlated with a tendency to frequent superficial situ- ations where body temperatures are readily elevated by basking. The re- mainder of the population retreats to deeper shelters. In late summer after egg laying and in early fall females again become relatively scarce in samples. Sex-ratio. — The seasonally fluctuat- ing sex ratio in samples raises the cjues- tion whether males are actually more numerous than females, or are merely easier to find. The following ratios of adult female to adult male captures in- dicate that females, regardless of their actual numbers, are more secretive and less readily taken: Individuals with only one cap- ture: 1 female to 1.85 males Individuals with 2 or 3 captures: 1 female to 3.34 males Individuals with 4 to 12 captures: 1 female to 6.85 males There may be some bias in most sam- ples arising from the fact that sexually mature males are more active than ma- ture females, or immatures of either sex, causing these males to be found more often. Physiological and behavorial differ- ences between the sexes must result in some differential mortality. Female mor- tality may be a little higher, judging from the fact that the oldest individuals recorded were all males (Table 13). However, the figures in Table 14 suggest tliat mortality rates are not much differ- ent in the sexes. Presumably in pre- adolescent young the sexes are alike in behavior or at least differ much less than adults, hence more acceptable ratios can be obtained from them. As shown in Table 11, males are more numerous than females even in the first-year young with an approximate ratio of 1.48 to 1. First- year and second-year young combined made up 40.8 per cent and 43.0 per cent. 46 MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATION MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY Table 13. — Records of Large (and old) Males of Diadophis punctatus Captured and Recaptured, Indicating Potential Longevity. Dates of Capture And Recaptvire Size (S-V) at Capture And Recaj)ture Time Span of Records (Years) Most Probable Age First Captvire Last Capture Possible Age Range at Latest Record 25 April 1966 - 11 Sept. 1973 260-284 8 7 15 10-17 + 5 May 1966 - 20 April 1970 274-282 4 10 14 9-14+ 18 April 1966 - 10 May 1968 276-293 2 11 13 8-15+ 12 May 1966 - 16 May 1970 283-291 4 13 or more 17 or more 13-19+ 9 May 1966 - 13 April 1970 273-280 4 10 14 9-14+ 2 Oct. 1964 - 2 Oct. 1970« 264-290 6 8 14 9-14+ 25 April 1966 - 9 April 1970" 267-278 4 8 12 6-12+ 17 April 1965 - 30 May 1970^ 267-268 5 8 13 -14+ 4 Sept. 1965 - 13 Oct. 1968 272-275 3 10 13 7-13+ 8 April 1965 - 15 April 1970 265-263 5 8 13 8-13+ 4 April 1966 - 17 April 1974 267-281 8 8 16 7-16+ 13 April 1968 - 17 April 1974 273-283 6 10 16 9-16+ 13 April 1968 - 14 May 1974 274-282 6 10 16 9-16+ a Recaptured also in April 1967, 1968, 1969 and 1970. '' Recaptured also in April 1970. "^ Recaptured also in May 1968. respectively, of the male and female samples in Table 11. Figures 17 and 18 show the changing ratios of adults to first-year young and to second-year young over an 18-year period. The ratios are believed to reflect varying reproductive success in different years. Also, they are affected by the times and places that samples were col- lected. In some years large concentra- tions of young were found in nursery areas, whereas in other years the collec- tions were made mostly in the areas where adults predominated. Fecund females are estimated to comprise approximately 20.2 per cent of the population. If the 1851 females rep- resented in Figure 19 produced an aver- 1960 1965 1970 1975 Fig. 18. — Percentages of adults (solid columns), second-year young (shaded colmuns), and first-year young (open columns) in annual fall population samples from the University of Kansas Natural His- tory Reservation and nearby areas, 1959 to 1974. FITCH: A DEMOGRAPHIC STUDY OF THE RINGNECK SNAKE 47 age of 3.89 eggs per clutch, their total output would amount to 7210 eggs and this annual increment would add 78.6 per cent to the spring population. It is calculated that by the following spring the hatchlings from these 7210 eggs would be reduced by approximately two-thirds to 2442 (1458 males, 984 fe- males ) . The 66 per cent mortality would be attributable to several causes, includ- ing resorption or abortion of eggs, in- fertility or inviability of some of those laid, genetically defective hatchlings, predation on hatchlings and winterkill of the hibernating young. The age pyramid in Figure 19 is based upon the actual numbers of snakes captured, but shows also the numbers of missing adult and second-year females that might have been present but un- detected (shaded ends of columns) if the sex ratio of 1.48 males to 1 female that was found in hatchlings is the real ratio for the older snakes also. PREDATION There are few published records of predation on Diadophis. In the present study 94 records of eight species of pred- ators on the Reservation and nearby areas were assembled; large series of pellets of raptors and scats of snakes were examined, hawk nests were visited on many occasions to check for remains of prey, and hundreds of live snakes of other kinds were palped to identify food objects. The records of predation on Diadophis included 35 by Agkistrodon contortrix, 25 by Biiteo jamaicensis, 15 by Coluber constrictor, 13 by Buteo platypterus, 2 by Lampropeltis triangu- him and 1 each by Bubo virginianus, Crotahis horridus and Rana catesbeiana (Table 15). Sample size varied from 2763 stomach examinations of Rana catesbeiana to only 20 records of feeding in Lampropeltis triangulum. The 192 pellets of Bid)o virginianus represent mainly the colder half of the year, with reptiles including Diadophis probably much less well represented than they would have been in summer. Table 15 shows sample sizes and frequency of Diadophis in food for the eight predator species, and attempts to show the rela- tive severity of predation on the basis of Table 14. — Sample of 9162 Ringneck Snakes Captured Over a 12-Year Period ( 1958- 1969) Arranged in Size Groups and Supposed Annual Age Groups to Show Progressive Reduction in Numbers with Increasing Age. Males Females Most Probable Age in Years Most typical Size Range (mm S-V) Actual Number In Size Class Total Alive At Start of Year Percent Lost During Year Most Typical Size Range (mm S-V) Actual Number In Size Class Total Alive At Start of Year Percent Lost During Year 1st 110-146 1458 5814 25.2 110-159 984 3348 29.4 2nd 147-214 920 4356 21.1 160-223 513 2364 21.6 3rd 215-233 851 3436 24.7 224-256 464 1854 25.1 4th 234-245 673 2585 26.0 257-272 380 1387 27.4 5th 246-253 484 1912 25.3 273-280 231 1007 21.6 6th 254-258 300 1428 21.0 281-287 169 776 21.8 7th 259-263 261 1128 23.2 288-294 163 607 26.8 8th 264-267 211 867 23.4 295-300 101 444 22.8 9th 268-271 154 656 23.4 301-305 89 343 26.0 10th 272-274 114 502 22.7 306-310 74 254 29.1 11th 275-277 92 388 23.7 311-315 49 180 27.2 12th 278-280 76 296 26.7 316-320 33 131 25.2 13th 281-283 56 220 25.4 321-325 27 98 27.5 14th 284-286 43 164 26.2 326-330 21 71 29.6 15th or older 287-351 121 331-392 50 48 MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATION MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY 1000 NUMBERS 500 OF SNAKES Fig. 19. — Age pyramid showing relative numbers of successive annual age classes of male and female Diadophis punctatus, based on figures in Table 14. Shaded portions of columns on female side rep- resent a part of the population not actually recorded but suspected to be present if the ratio of 1.42 males to 1 female found in first-year young is correct for adults also. frequency of Diadophis in the food, pop- ulation density of the predator, and frequency of its feeding. Number of meals consumed annually by each kind of predator on the 590-acre Reservation have been estimated from censuses of the predators and observations on the frequencies of their feeding. Most kinds are present and active only in the warmer part of the year. For Bxiho vir- ginianus and Buteo jamaicensis, both present throughout the entire year, the estimated total number of meals is di- vided by two because it is unlikely that predation on Diadophis would occur during the colder half of the year. The figures suggest that the copper- head and blue racer combined account for 94 per cent of the known predation whereas none of the other six predators accounts for as much as 1.5 per cent. The combined kill of the eight known predators would account for approxi- mately 1700 Diadophis annually, a little less than 7.4 per hectare on the Reser- vation. However, this toll seems trivial in view of the finding that Diadophis attains population densities of several hundred per hectare over extensive areas of favorable habitat. Presumably the population is regulated by some other mortality factors. Other predators may be even more important than those studied, although no records of their predation on Dia- dophis were obtained. The eastern mole Scalopus aquaticus is one such suspect. It is known to feed largely on earth- worms and other invertebrates, but feed- ing experiments with captive moles on the Reservation demonstrated that they would catch and eat small reptiles at every opportunity. The spotted skunk (Spilo ^ CO ^ *3 ~ >< ^ -c p ^ ^■^ c: ^ J- r^ ••^ o ■■ i. 1-1 Oj 2 S CO .ti u ^ oq •2 s ««. S s >< ^-^ ^ W3 1 1^- s j^ kJ K S ^ 5a ft >- en o ■§§1 O S o o ^ S o -S >> "C ■— v „ o ■w i= ?3 B a S .Co ■:= oq i! .5 IS'" CiC < ^ s >. o 5; ?^ en ^ <♦<* ^ EB cS ■^ CO - r-g ^H -2 X Co o o C v^ en ^ ■Ji ft P t^ o -- ■* •~ (M aj CQ .« '-' Co tn •^ ,4^ o S Ji .2 13 •S ^ c5 ?JD (M -S 05 » --1 ^ g .2 ^ 5 'J-' _ c « OJ P O .S Oj en c c 0-) <^ ^ -2 S .2 ;= i-^ C/D o ^ I O n3 c S a^ o feed upon small reptiles, and, as all are fairly common on the Reservation, they may be among the major predators on Diadophis there. The wood mouse Peromtjscus leuco- pus is known to take a variety of animal matter in its food. Evidence that it may prey on hibernating Diadophis was ob- tained in November and December of 1964, after several of these and other snakes were released at known hiber- nacula at hilltop limestone outcrops, with thermisters implanted and with fine and extremely pliable wires attached to them and extending to the surface. After sev- eral weeks it was found that all the wires had been cut by the mice and there was evidence that the reptiles themselves had been eaten. Perhaps in these instances the snakes were handicapped by the at- tached wires, so that they were prevented from reaching the deep and secure shel- ters where they would have hibernated. However any small reptile hibernating where its body surface is accessible to mice would seem to be vulnerable to predation. The shrew Blarina brevicauda also is a potential predator, especially on hatchlings. Many of the snakes bore scars on their bodies, and especially on their tails, that could have been inter- preted as shrew bites. These worm-sized snakes, especially the smaller individuals are potential prey for birds other than raptors, such as the crow Corvus brachyrhijnchos. Blue Jay Cyanocitta cristata. Crackle Quiscalus quiscula. Yellow-billed Cuckoo Coccyzus americanus and Brown Thrasher Toxo- stoma rufiim. Disease may be an important mortal- ity factor. One common ailment caused the snakes to develop blisterlike swell- ings in the skin, and sometimes these produced open lesions. The snakes so afflicted were in varying degrees emaci- ated and sickly in appearance. Ringneck snakes kept in confinement dehydrated rapidly unless they had access to water, but those kept in damp surroundings rapidly developed the ailment described. 50 MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATION MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY and succumbed. Blanchard, Gilreath and Blanchard (in press) described this same ailment in the population that they stud- ied in northern Michigan, and Hender- son (1970) was handicapped by it in his study of food and water consumption in confined ringneck snakes. Winterkill may involve considerable mortality in addition to predation of the hibernating snakes. Since Diadophis lacks capacity for digging and can only follow existing passageways or force its way through loose soil, entombment or entrapment might frequently occur through deposition or compaction of the soil around the hibernating snake. Freez- ing is also a potential source of winter mortality, but the species penetrates into regions having much more severe winter climates than that of northeastern Kan- sas, where this must be a relatively minor factor. DISCUSSION Compared with small vertebrates in general, the ringneck snake is K-selected {semu Dobzhansky, 1951; MacArthur and Wilson, 1967; Pianka, 1970) in the following respects: sexual maturity de- layed (first breeding in third year), brood size reduced (3.9 eggs per clutch, produced once annually), young rela- tively large and well developed at hatch- ing (36% of maternal length and 12% of maternal weight), life expectancy in- creased (annual mortality in adults less than 25 per cent, with some individuals attaining ages of 15 years or more). All these traits make for stability of popu- lations and except for the climax vegeta- tion itself the ringneck is one of the most stable elements in its community. Snakes in general are notable for longevity, and associated stability of populations. How- ever, considering the small size of the ringneck, it has progressed farther than most in the direction of K-selection, a trend correlated with its secretive and partly subterranean habits. The ringneck snake is a predator on various sorts of small vertebrates and invertebrates but the trend of food habits differs in different parts of the range. The locale of this field study is in the ecotone between deciduous forest and grassland, at the eastern edge of the Great Plains, near the center of the geo- graphic range of the ringneck snake, which is a wide-ranging, polytypic spe- cies. Selective pressures in this ecotonal region have produced a population dif- ferent from any in other parts of the range, but many of the differences are subtle. Snakes of the population studied are relatively small and stubby, highly variable in extent and pattern of dark ventral markings, and more secretive and subterranean in habits as compared with eastern populations (but perhaps less so than far western and southwestern pop- ulations). In feeding they have become specialists dependent almost entirely on earthworms, whereas elsewhere popula- tions are much more versatile but with a tendency to specialize on plethodont salamanders (northeastern United States and Appalachian region), on insects and other invertebrates (southeastern United States) or on small reptiles (Southwest). Geographic variation in size and morphological characters occurs along with variation in food habits, but the morphological variation does not closely parallel the behavioral variation. Gehl- bach (1974) noted that in Diadophis punctatus armji of Texas, near the range of D. p. regalis, size remains relatively small, but armji in that area resembles regalis in its ophiphagous habits. When individuals of the two subspecies were confined together, mating occurred de- spite the disparity in size. Cannibalism did not occur in these mixed pairs al- though other small snakes were readily eaten when confined with the large D. p. regalis. Gehlbach found intergradation between the subspecies arnyi and regalis in central and western Texas, but in the Guadalupe Mountains he found isolated populations of both types with no inter- breeding. Gehlbach speculated that small ringneck snakes similar to arnyi FITCH: A DEMOGRAPHIC STUDY OF THE RINGNECK SNAKE 51 and the more eastern subspecies, of worm-eating habits and mesic habitats, are ancestral and that the large, ophi- phagous regalis-type populations evolved from these snakes in Pliocene Madro- Tertiary woodlands. An alternative pos- sibility is that regalis is the more primi- tive and that arntji and far eastern and far western subspecies are derived from a regalis-like ancestor. Although evolu- tion conceivably could have proceeded in either direction, regalis seems more generalized, that is, more like related genera of xenodontine snakes, but with less typical exhibition of the characters that distinguish Diadophis. Among such generalized characters are: euryphagous habits and predation on small verte- brates, lack of a neck ring, and large body size associated with large numbers of ventral and subcaudal scales and with 17 body scale rows, whereas other sub- species have only 15 to 13 rows. The abundance and availability of earthworms as a food supply has per- mitted attainment of remarkably high population density and biomass by the snakes in the area of my study. Through- out much of its range the ringneck is one of the less common species of snakes, but in northeastern Kansas it probably outnumbers all other species combined. On the basis of known population struc- ture and the average weight of individ- uals of different sizes it is calculated that 3.6 grams is a typical weight. A popula- tion of 1266 snakes per hectare (the average of seven capture-recapture cen- suses) would thus have a biomass of 4.58 kilograms. Of local vertebrates only the prairie vole (Microttis ochrogaster) has been found to attain higher biomass over extensive areas, with 7.41 kg per hectare in an actual sample, but the vole is a primary consumer, and its population is subject to rapid and drastic change. Other vertebrates of the Reservation known to occur, at times, in biomass ex- ceeding 1 kg per hectare include the cottontail, Sijlvilagus fioridanus, 3.88 kg (in the only instance in which a popu- lation was adequately measured; how- ever, it probably often exceeds this figure and is the most important primary con- sumer among the local vertebrates); slender glass lizard, Ophisaurus attenu- atus, 1.96 kg (in brushy former pastures dominated by tall brome grass); Great Plains skink, Enmeces obsoletus, 1.86 kg (in rocky, open hilltop habitat in 1949, but subsequently almost eliminated by unfavorable changes in the course of vegetational succession); worm snake, Carphophis vermis, 1.67 kg (on rocky, wooded hillside and hilltop); five-lined skink, Eumeces fasciatiis, 1.34 kg (in open woodland soon after livestock were removed, but succcssional trends subse- quently caused marked reduction); cop- perhead Agkistrodon contortrix, 1.23 kg; cotton rat, Sigmodon hispidus, 1.11 kg (probably often exceeded by this primary consumer, but the cotton rat is also sub- ject to drastic reduction and is usually much below this figure even at times and places where habitat is favorable). These incomplete and preliminary figures indicate that Diadophis attains biomass levels comparable with those of the most abundant vertebrate primary consumers and much exceeding the other local reptiles that feed upon inverte- brates such as insects and annelids. Traits peculiar to the local popula- tion of Diadophis must have arisen over a long period of selection and adjustment to climate, habitat and biotic associates. On the other hand profound changes in the species' ecology must have been brought about within the past 125 years as the region was altered from its orig- inal state by settlement, agriculture and industry. Within the ecotone between deciduous forest and prairie, there was formerly an abrupt transition from wood- land to grassland, but tree-cutting, elim- ination of prairie fires, and pasturing of livestock destroyed the clear-cut bound- aries and created a much more extensive transitional zone with a mixture of wood- land and prairie types of vegetation that 52 MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATION MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY provided better habitat for ringneck snakes than either type in its pure form. Meanwhile the common and adaptable earthworm Allolohophora caJU^inosa, in- troduced from the Old World, became established in a thriving population that provided an abundant new food supply for the ringneck snake. Although there are on record no actual observations of population changes in Diadophis, it may be speculated that the vastly improved habitat and food supply resulting from man's alteration of the original forest- prairie ccotone, caused a population ex- plosion of the snakes. Perhaps they are more abundant now than ever before. LITERATURE CITED Anderson, P. 1965. The reptiles of Missouri. LTm\'. Missouri Press, Columbia, xxiii + 330 pp. Barbour, R. W. 1950. The reptiles of Big Black Mountain, Harlan County, Kentucky. Copeia, 1950:100-107. Blanchard, F. N. 1926. Eggs and young of the eastern ringneck snake Diadophis punc- tatiis edwaidsi. Pap. Michigan Acad. Sci. Arts, Lett., 7:279-292. Blanchard, F. N. 1930. Further studies of the eggs and young of the eastern ringneck snake Diadophis punciatus edwaidsi. Bull. Antivenin Inst. Amer., 4(1):4-10. Blanchard, F. N., 1937. Eggs and natural nests of the eastern ringneck snake, Dia- dophis punctatus edwardsi. Pap. Michigan Acad. Sci. Arts, Lett. 22:521-532. Blanchard, F. N. 1942. The ringneck snakes, genus Diadopliis. Bull. Chicago Acad., Sci., 7(1):1-144. Blanchard, F. N., Finster, E. B. 1933. A method of marking living snakes for future recognition with a discussion of some prob- lems and results. Ecology, 14:334-347. Blanchard, F. N., Gilreath, R., Blanchard, F. C. in press. The eastern ring-necked snake (Diadophis punctatus edwardsi) in northern Michigan. Jour. Herpetology. Buikema, a. L. Jr., Armitage, K. B. 1969. The effect of temperature on the metabolism of the prairie ringneck snake, Diadophis punctatus arnyi Kennicott. Herpetologica, 25:194-206. Clark, D. R., Jr. 1966. A funnel trap for small snakes. Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci., 69(l):91-95. Clark, D. R. Jr. 1967. Experiments into se- lection of soil type, soil moisture level, and temperature by five species of small snakes. Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci., 70:490-496. Clark, D. R. Jr. 1970. Ecological study of the worm snake, Carphophis vermis ( Ken- nicott). Univ. Kansas Publ. Mus. Nat. Hist., 19(2):85-194. CoNANT, R. 1948. Regeneration of clipped subcaudal scales in a pilot blacksnake. Chi- cago Acad. Sci., Natural History Miscel- lanea, no. 13:1-2. DoBZHANSKY, T. 1951. Gcuetics and the ori- gin of species. Columbia Univ. Press, New York. Dundee, H. A., Miller, M. C. 1968. Aggre- gative behavior and habitat conditioning by the prairie ringneck snake, Diadophis punc- tatus arnyi. Tulane Studies Zool. Bot., 15: 41-58. Ernst, S. G. 1962. Notes on the life history of the eastern ringneck snake. Turtox News, 40 (10): 266-267. Fitch, H. S. 1951. A simplified type of funnel trap for reptiles. Herpetologica, 7:77-80. Fitch, H. S. 1956. Temperature responses in free-living amphibians and reptiles of north- eastern Kansas. Univ. Kansas Publ. Mus. Nat. Hist., 8(7):417-476. Fitch, H. S. 1958. Home ranges, territories and seasonal movements of vertebrates of the Natural History Reservation. Univ. Kansas Publ. Mus. Nat. Hist., 11(3) :63-326. Fitch, H. S. 1960. Autecology of the copper- head. Univ. Kansas Publ. Mus. Nat. Hist., 13:85-288. Fitch, H. S. 1963. Natural history of the racer, Cohiher constrictor. Univ. Kansas Publ. Mus. Nat. Hist., 15:351-468. Fitch, H. S. 1965. An ecological study of the garter snake, Thamnophis sirtaJis. Univ. Kansas Publ. Mus. Nat. Hist, 15:49.3-564. Fitch, H. S., Fleet, R. R. 1970. Natural history of the milk snake (LampropeUis trian^tdum) in northeastern Kansas. Herpe- tologica, 26(4):387-396. Gehlbach, F. R. 1974. Evolutionary relations of southwestern ringneck snakes (Diadophis punctatus). Herpetologica, .30:140-148. Greene, H. W. 1973. Defensive tail display by snakes and amphisbaenians. Jour. Herpe- tology, 7(3) : 14.3-161. Henderson, R. W. 1970. Feeding behavior, digestion and water requirements of Dia- dophis punctatus arnyi Kennicott. Herpe- tologica, 26(4):520-526. Klauber, L. M. 1956. Rattlesnakes. 2 vols. LIniv. California Press, Berkeley. MacArthur, R. H., Wilson, E. O. 1967. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey. FITCH: A DEMOGRAPHIC STUDY OF THE RINGNECK SNAKE 53 Myers, C. W. 1965. Biology of the ringneck snake, Diadopliis punctatus, in Florida. Bull. Florida State Mus., 10:43-90. Noble, G. K., Clausen, H. J. 1936. The ag- gregation beha\'ior of Storeria dekayi and other snakes with especial reference to the sense organs involved. Ecol. Monogr., 6: 269-316. Petersox, H. W. 1956. A record of \'iviparity in a normally oxiparous snake. Herpetolog- ica, 12(2): 152. PiAXKA, E. R. 1970. On r- and K-selection. American Naturalist, 104:592-597. Smith, A. K. 1973. Feeding strategies and population dynamics of the bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana). ( Unpublished dissertation, University of Kansas Library). Vax Dexburgh, J. 1922. The reptiles of west- ern North America. Occas. Papers Cali- fornia Acad. Sci., 10:1-1028. Wright, A. H., Wright, 1957. Handbook of snakes of the United States and Canada. Comstock Publ. Associates, Cornell Univ. Press, vol. 1, xviii + 564 pp. \ AVAILABLE MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS IN HERPETOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY 52. Reproductive cycles in lizards and snakes. By Henry S. Fitch. Pp. 1-247, 16 fig- ures in text. June 19, 1970. Paper bound, $5.00 postpaid. 53. Evolutionary relationships, osteology, and zoogeography of leptodactyloid frogs. By John D. Lynch. Pp. 1-238, 131 figures in text. June 30, 1971. Paper bound, $7.00 postpaid. 55. Middle American Hzards of the genus Ameiva (Teiidae) with emphasis on geo- graphic variation. By Arthur C. Echtemacht. Pp. 1-86, 28 figures in text. De- cember 14, 1971. Paper bound, $3.00 postpaid. 57. A systematic review of the Teiid lizards, genus Bachia, with remarks on Heter- odactylus and Anotosaura. By James R. Dixon. Pp. 1-47, 15 figures in text. February 2, 1973. Paper boimd, $1.50 postpaid. 59, Systematics and evolution of the Andean lizard genus Pholidobolus (Sauria: Teiidae). By Richard R. Montanucci. Pp. 1-52, 8 figures in text. May 14, 1973. Paper bound, $1.75 postpaid. 61. Reproductive strategies in a tropical anuran community. By Martha L. Crump. Pp. 1-68, 13 figures in text. November 15, 1974. Paper bound, $4.50 postpaid. 62. A demographic study of the ringneck snake (Diadophis punctatus) in Kansas. Pp. 1-53, 19 figures in text. April 3, 1975. Paper bound, $3.00 postpaid. MONOGRAPHS IN HERPETOLOGY 1. The hylid frogs of middle America. William E. Duellman. Pp. 1-753, 324 text figures, 72 color plates. 1970. Two volumes, cloth bound, $25.00 postpaid. PUBLIC EDUCATION SERIES 1. Amphibians and reptiles in Kansas. Joseph T. Collins. Pp. 1-283, 8 figures, 91 maps, 103 halftones in text. 1974. Paper bound, $5.00 postpaid. 2. Illustrated guide to amphibians and reptiles in Kansas / An identification manual. Daryl Kams, Ray E. Ashton, Jr., and Tom Swearingen. 28 pages, many illustra- tions. Paper bound, $1.00 postpaid. I f oA, erne Bookbinding Co.. Inc. 300 Summer St(e«it Btston. Mass. 0??!') . 3 2044 093 361 632 Date Due