BA LL DIN 18) 9 OF THE PORREY BOTANICAL CLUB: bb 2 ae SS FouNDED BY WILLIAM H. LEGGETT, 1870. 1895. NEW YORK: 1893. PUBLISHED FOR THE CLUB, Tue New ERA PrinTING House, LANCASTER, PA. . GENERAL INDEX. (Illustrated articles are designated by an asterisk * before the page number.) Adiantum cuneatum, Two perfectly developed Embryos on a single Prothallium of, 407. Algz in the Herbarium of the Long Island Histor-- ical Society, 107. Altitudinal Distribution of the Ferns of the Appa- lachian Mountain System, The, 455. Amarantus blitoides, S. Wats., 70, 170. Anatomy as a Special Department of Botany, 100. Anthracnose of the Bean and Watermelon, Iden- tity of, 246. Anthracnoses, A Study of Solanaceous, 109 Aralia nudicaulis, L., var. elongata, n. var , 374 Assimilation by Plants, — sepa 148. Aster leiophyllus, n. s Aulisci of California, The ‘he Fo ossil, 118. Biological Survey of Indiana, 338 Blephilia ciliata (L.), Raf., in Western New York, 408 Block rey R. I.,in July and August, A List of Plants found on, 231. Botanical Congress, An International, 69. Botanical Pinata 20, 68, 121, 169, 2©5, 297, 374,408, Bcd e Notes from Bainbridge, Georgia, 384. Botanists, Southern, 315. Briofite Fossili, Su alcune, 410. Carex arctata, Boott, var. Faxoni, Bailey, 374. Carex, Notes on, 417. Casting-off of the Tips of Branches of certain | Trees, On the, *157. Characez, Notes on New, 119. Characez, Notes on Some, 256. Cicuta maculata, Notes on, 441. Composite, Studies upon Akenes and Seedlings of Plants of the order, *1. Contributions to American Bryology, 393° CONTRIBUTORS: Allen, T. F., rz Atkinson, Geo, a , 258. +» 356 357» 405, 497, 435- Bicknell, E Britton, E. as - re & Plug ‘ad Campbell, Douglas . Aagt, Clute, Willard N., Cockerell, T. D. i ; ceo s Collins, bee a 240. aie ‘Eaton, D. C., tnt ang. = Embryo of Ferns, Unequal as iirc viridiflora, A new Station for, 440. — Ellis, J. B., 29 Evans, Alexander W., *307. Everhart, B +» 297- Farlow, W. G ny 107. Faxon, Edwin, 257. Foerste, Aug. F., Greene, Edward L. ed, B. D , 20, 51, 109, 246, 250, 298, 391, 442,* 437, *485, 489. Heller, A. A., 18, 55. Hicks, G. H., 374 Hollick, A. ,29, "868,220, *334, 337- Holzinger, Jo +» ¥287. ham, R. H., yeh, Smith Ely, 2435 411. ain, C. H., 211, 259. Kearney, T. H., Jr., 253, 474- Knowlton, F. H; 212. Leiberg, J. B., *r12. Linn, A. F., 258. Matthew, W. a, 30: Millspaugh, C. ¥. 22. Morong, Thomas, 31, 121, 217, 260, 467. Nash, G. V., 374 : Pammel, L. H., 358, 441. Penhallow, D. P., hak Peters, John E, Porter, Thomas ad 193, *207, *254. ae Redfield, J. H. » 98s 410. ee » *429- Stevens, F. L., 252. Sudworth, Geo. B , go. Underwood, L. M., ar. Vail, A. M. re Williams, FA, Cottonwood, On the ‘American Black, #46. Cucurbits, Crossing of, 3 Cuscuta, A Shay of the Scale Characters of the. Northeastern American Species of, ‘Flower of Cypripedium arietinum, A monstrous 339- Diatomacez, Introduction to sige Diatomées, De la Culture artificiélle ae Duplicate Binomials, 443. mentation nase a Significance in the Primary ivision of the, 408. idium, Notes upon a new, 437. Flora of Block Island, Notes on the, 227. : Flora of Kentucky with a List of Plants Comeceed in Harlan and Bell cone ee ~ 1V Flora of Luzerne county, Pa., Preliminary Report on the, 55. Fossil Palm from the Cretaceous Formation at ' Glen Cove, Long Island, A new, *163. Fossil Plants as Tests of Climate, 29. Funghi Parassiti della Piante coltivate, 297. Fungi collected in Jamaica, Notes on Some, 295. Fungi Cojlumbiani, 297. Fungi, Economic, 298. Fungi, North American, 442. Georgia pellucida et les Espéces alliées, 494. Grasses of Pennsylvania, A List of the, 193. Habenaria, Beitrage zur einer Monographie der Gattung, 2 50- Hartwrightia Floridana, the Systematic Position of, #28 sidlanroviaes of the common Mallow, 489. Hepaticz, two new American, *207. Herbiers, Sur la Conservation des, 21. Hieracium, a neglected Species of, *120. Hogg, Thomas, 217 Index to Recent Literature relating to American Botany, 24, 82, 130, 172, 223, 255, 263, 299, 340, 375» 411 449, 491. Index to Recent Literature Relating to American Botany, ‘he, 489. Insular Vegetation, 409. International Botanical Congress, 298. Ipomcea pandurata, 258. Tridacez and other Orders—Notes upon various Species of, 467. Jeger Moss Herbarium, The, 335. Kreidepflanzen, Ueber Boemische, 30. Kryptogamen Flora, Rabenhorst’s, 260. . Lichens of the Black Hills and their Distribution, 349- Listera, os new Species of, with Notes on other > 31. . Martindale, Isaac C., 98. Minnesota State Herbaria, Notes from the, #238. Mosses from Idaho, Two new Species of, *112. Mosses, Two new American, 116, Nasturtium Armoracia, Notes on, 290. Newberry, John Strong, *89. New Honors to Old Weeds, 337. New Jersey Flora, Additions to the, 252. Nomenclature, A simple Point in, 212. Nomenclature, On legitimate Authorship of Cer- tain Binomials, with other Notes on, 4o. Orchids, An Examination of the Seeds of some native, *183. Organization of a Society of American Botanists, ae Fe Ss Orthotrichum, Notes on American Species of, 393- Paleobotanical Papers read before the Section of s: Geology and Geography, A. A. A. S. i- son Meeting, 367. ce bie, ene Phanerogams, New or Noteworthy North Ameri- can, *277. Photography as an Instrument for Recording the macroscopic Characters of Micro-organisms in artificial Cultures, 359. Pilularia Americana, The Development of the Sporocarp of, *141. Plants Collected by Dr. Rusby in South America, An Enumeration of, 137. Plants found in the Ridgewood Water Supply of the City of Brooklyn, 243. Plants from Bolivia, New Genera of, *429. Plasomen, Contribution to the probable Biology of, 380. Pelargoniums, Dropsical, 39t. Polygonum, Further Notes on American Species of, *213. Polypodium vulgare, var. Cambricum, 21. Proceedings of the Club, 22, 70, 128, 171, 221, 260, 446, 491. : Proceedings of the Botanical Club, A. A. A. S., Madison Meeting, 360. Proceedings of the Madison Botanical Congress, 368. Reviews of Foreign Literature, 29, 73, 123, 220, 259, 411, 444. Rhode Island Flora, Notes on the, 240. Rusbya, A new Genus of Vacciniacee from Bolivia, 67. Salix myrtilloides, Cohesion of the Filaments in, 441. Saxifraga aizoides, L., A new Station in New York State for, 68. ‘ Scabiosa australis, 490. Scabiosa australis and Reseda alba, Notes on, 22, 1 . Seedlings, A Contribution to the Knowledge of, 123. Senecio Robbinsii, Oakes, #19. Serenopsis Kempii, *334. Solandi Process of Sun Printing, The, *485, Solanum elzagnifolium, forma albiflorum, 410. Solidago humilis, Pursh, of the Eastern States and its Allies, #207. . Sporangium of Ferns in the Dispersion of Spores, The Extent of the Annulus and the Function of the different Parts of the, 435. 2 dared in the Roots of the Ophioglossacez, 356. Tennessee Flora, Additions to the, 2 53- Titles of Papers read before the Section of Botany _any, A. A. A.S , Madison Meeting, 365. Trifolium medium, Note on, 122. Variation accounted for, 122. Vasey, Dr. hay a Death of, 1 deere pruni olium, var. glo Water Lilies, Pink, 21. Weed Seeds, A Century of, 20, 51. Wolle, Francis, 211. » 218. m, 709. GENERIC INDEX. Abies, 42, 45- Abutilon, 52, 172, 232, 269, 341. Acacia, 25. Acalypha, 173, 237; 475, 481. Acanthorhiza, 375. Acer, 61, 135, 159, 165, 450, 482, 4gt. Achatocarpus, 128. Achillea, 11, 12, 17, 53, 63, 235- Achyla, 346. Achlys, 456. Achroanthes, 32, 36, 186, 192, 480. Acidodontium, 378. Acmanthera, 429. Aconitum, 376. Acorus, 66, 238. * Acrodiclidium, 497. Actzea, 60, 225. Adenocalymna, 348. Adenostemma, 287. Addisonia, 432, 434. Adiantum, 67, 375, 406, 407, 408, 458, 459. aAdicea, 480. chmzea, 412, 491. fEcidium, 296, 442. /Egyphila, 88. fEsculus, 159, 164, 165, 167, 222, 263, 500. Afromendornica, 412. Aganisia, 82. Agaricus, 296, 494. Agarista, 497- Agave, 82, 94, 134, 172, 377) 412» 416, 491- Ageratella, 432. Agoseris, 416. Agrianthus, 432. Agrimonia, 52, 481. Agropyrum, 54, 207, 239, 341. Agrostemma, 52, 343- Agrostis, 66, 200, 239, 341, 475, 478- Ailanthus, 159, 228. ~ Aira, 201. Albizzia, 25. Alchemilla, 253. Alectoria, 353- Alethopteris, 275. Alisma, 66, 478. Allium, 348, 442. Allomia, 287, 288. Allopectus, 83. Alnus, 65, 225, 480. Alopecurus, 198. Alsine, 232, 252, 277. yssum, 232. Amarantus, 54, 70, 73, 179, 236, 241,257, uria, 412. Amaurochete, 80. Ambrosia, 2, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 13, 16, 53, 235» 25!- Amelanchier, 85, 448, 491, 496- Foe aga 201, 239. 2990- 3 j Ampelopsis, 159, 168, 228, 230, 2332 300, 361, 482» Am “ 245. Asplenium, 18, 58, 60, 67, 239» 375» 45° 459 4 5 Anaphalis, 63, 235- Anastrophyllum, 376. Ancyrophorus, 80. Andrea, 127, 273- Andromeda, 235, 3645 4371 438, 439) 482- Andropogon, 66, 197, 239, 478- Aneimia, 436. Anemia, 497- Anemone, 60. Anemonopsis, 225. Aneura, 378. Angelica, 62, 88. Angiopteridium, 449. Anisogonium, 492. Anomodon, 274, Anonymo, 472. Antennaria, 235, 253, 296- Anthemis, 1, 2, 3, 11, 17, 515 53» 235- Anthoceros, 376, 378. Anthoxanthum, 198. Anthurium, 375. Anychia, 480. Aphelandra, 348. Aphyllon, 412. Apios, 56, 61, 233, 416. Aplectrum, 186, 187, 192, 295- Apocynum, 53, 344- Arabis, 58, 61, 496. Araceen, 25 (?). Aralia, 62, 130, 223, 374» 482. Araliopsis, 345. Arbutus, 437- Archzophyton, 95. Arctagrostis, 341. Arctium, 2 3s 42 52 0» 13, 17 532 235, 251- Arctostaphylos, 86, 269, 437» 438- Arcyria 77, 81, 82, 296. Ardisia, 14°, 348, 377- Arenaria, 229, 2323 4°9- Arethusa, 32, 186, 189, 192, 295. Arisema, 66, 295. Aristida, ha ag 239 478» 495- Aristolochia, 375, 477» 45°- Armeniaca, 134. Arracacia, 304, 365- Arrhenatherum, 201. ee ‘Artemisia, 2, 12, 17, 63, 241, 287. Arthrodesmus, 244. j Arthronia, 85. Arthroni : iopsis, 85. Arthrophycus, 367, 449, 453- 296 eet a 53> 379, 493- Ascophyllum, 229. Ascyrum, 263, 482. Asimina, 480. 8, 492. ce Astely 1s doty 5751 8s 26,251 Bs 39» 637839 32), 228, _ 254, 255» 286 294, 377» 499» 475» 47% a ge a Vi Asterionella, 246. Astilbe, 241, 475, 481. Astragalus, 94, 174, 269, 285, 301, 304, 306, 377 493, 496. Athyrium, 492. Atrichum, 378. Atriplex, 237. Atropis, 341. Atunus, 472. _Auliscus, 118 Avena, 201. Azalea, 64, 475, 481. Azolla, 340. Bacillus, 220, 243, 412. Baclea, 496. Bacterium, 151. Badhamia, 76, 79, 82. Balantiopsis, he Baldwinia, 318. Banisteria, 316 Baptisia, 230, 481, 492, 496. 78. Bartonia, 64, 236, 286. Batatas, 443. Bauhinia, 97. Bazzania, 452. Befaria, 139. Behen, 344- Bennettites, 450. » 375- Betula, 60, 65, 480 Bidens, 2, 53, 59, 63, 235, 280, 281, 484. Beehmeria, 59, 65, 175, 480. _Bolelia, 496. ay Bosia, 128, _ Botrychium, 67, 127, 295, 356, 363. Botrytis, 392. nia, 493- : eloua, 202, 264, 442, 495. Bouvardia, 429. Brachycheta, 484. Brachyelytrum, 199, 478. Brachymenium, 378. Brasenia, 60, 264. Brassavola, 492. Brassica, 52, 232. _ Brefeldia, 80. _ Breutelia, 378. shia, 361. runella, 54, 84, 236. 2 378. — — Cacalia, 57, 63, 269, 484. _ Czenopteris, 492. : ~zoma, 173- Cesalpinia, 223, 378. Cakile, 223, 229, 232, 443. Caladium, 375. Calceolaria, 492, 500. Calamagrostis, 200, 201, 341. 4 Calamintha, 294. Calandrinia, 135. Calathea, 268. Calea, 304, 378. Calenia, 85. Calicium, 302. Calla, 122. Callistemophyllum, 30. Callithamnion, 107, 108. Callitriche, 175, 234. Calochortus, 340, 344, 348. Lo ont 304. Calopogon, 33, 34, 121, 122, 189. Calycanthus, 161, 168, 493. 89 Calypso, 186, 187, 192, 264. Calyptridium, 135. Camarea, 429. Camellia, 448. Campanula, 23, 63, 223, 475, 483- Camptosorus, 58, 67, 461, 478. Campylopus, 86, 378. Caneila, 46. Capnoides, 475, 480. Capnorchis, 175. Capparis, 348. Capriola, 202. Capsicum, 126. Cardamine, 344, 376. Cardiocarpon, 95. Carduus, 53, 63, 132, 241, 301, 492. Carex, 66, 238, 242, 264, 284, 326, 374, 413, 417,418, 419» 420, 421, 422, 423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 475, 479» 499 Carlomohria, 451, 493. oe 43, 05, 164, 166, 167, 480. - arpolites, 454. Cassandra, 59, 438. Cassia, 52, 61, 230, 481. Cassiope, 437. Castalia, 21, 58, 61, 129, 175, 231. | Castanea, 99, 164, 480. . Castilleia, ~" Catabrosa, 264. Catalpa, 162, 360, 443. oe 262. thea, 32, 33, 34, 121. Carieva po " Caulanthus, 493. Caulophyllum, 480. Cavendishia, 138. Ceanothus, 61, 344. Celastrophyllum 9}. Celastrus, 25, 159. Celtis, 162, 163, 167, Cenchrus, 54, 196, 239 z Centaurea, 132. ; Cephalanthera, 35. Cephalanthus, 59, 62, 162, 228, 234, 433. _ Cephalozia, 308. Cephaluros, 367. Cerastium, 61, 232, 409. Cerasus, 481. © Ceratocystis, 28. Ceratostemma, 137, 138. Cercis, 161, 167, 481. Cercospora, 251, 298, 341, 442. Cereus, 416, 449. Chamzcyparis, 362. Chamelirium, 479. Chamzraphis, 54, 196, 239. Champia, 83. pmannia, 331. Chara, 120, 134, 176, 264. Characium, 244 Cheilanthes, 458. Chelone, 64, 483. Chenopodium, 54, 237. Vii Chiloscyphus, 378. Chimaphila, 64, 281. Chlamydomonas, 226. Chlorogalum, 377, 442. Chondrioderma, 77, 81, 82. Chondromyces, 27. Chrysanthemum, 1, 2, 11, 12, 17, 53, 63, 229, 235, 251. Chrysopogon, 197. Chrysopsis, 477, 484. Cibotium, 436. Cichorium, 53, 230, 235. Cicuta, 59, 62, 234, 367, 441, 442, 482. Cimicifuga, 60, 225, 253, 477, 480. Cinna, 200, 478. Circza, 482. Citrellus, 132, 248, 249, 358, 359- Citrus, 366. Cladium, 175. Cladonia, 302, 351, 355, 364. Cladosporium, 171, 304. Clastoderma, 80. Clathroptychium, 76. Claytonia, 83, 135, 316, 3773 496 Clavija, 140. avipes, 220. Clematis, 60, 263, 480. Cleome, 277, 495. Clethra, 139, 228, 235, 474, 482. Clintonia, 475, 480. Clitoria, 481. Closterium, 244. Cnicus, 6, 13, 14, 17, 132, 235, 269. Coccoloba, 497. Cocconeis, 245. Coccocypselum, 173. Codium, 109. Coleanthus, 342. Coleochete, 244. Coleosanthus, 173. Coleosporium, 133, 298. Colina, 493. Colonilla, 175. Coloptera, 94. Collema, 354. Colletotrichum, rog, 110, 111, 112, 226, 247, 248, 249, 250, 251. Colliguaja, 25: Collinsia, 83, 376. Collinsonia, 483. /is8 ora 286. oloptera, 3o0r. Colpodinin’ 24a. Comandra, 302. Comarum, 340. Comatricha, 79, 269. Commelina, of 479+ Comptonia, 228. Condalia, 340. Coniocybe, 302. - Conium, 298. Convolvulus, 53, 236, 337. Copernicia, 169. ‘ Coprinus, 264. Corycarpus, 475, 478. Corydalis, 61.” _ Crategus, 285, 481. Craterium, 78, 79, 82. Crepis, 83, 338. Cribraria, 76, 79, 82. Croomia, 331. Crotalaria, 52, 306, 376, 385. Crypsis, 199. Cryptocarya, 497. Cucubalus, 344. Cucumis, 132, 248, 249, 358, 359. Cucurbita, 132, 248, 358, 359. Cunila, 65, 267, 483. Cuphea, 269, 482. Cuscuta, 64, 310, 311, 483, 489. Cyathea, 436. Cyathus, 296. Cybianthus, 140. Cycas, 381. Cyclanthera, 269. Cymbidium, 121. Cymopterus, 223, 301. Cynodon, 202. Cynoglossum, 53. Cyperella, 175. Cyperus, 238, 479, 499- Cypripedium, 39, 66, 132, 186, 190, 192, 264, 339, _ 450. Cyrilla, 446. Cyrtoceros, 414. ‘ Cystopteris, 67, 464, 478. Cystopus, 297, 298. Dactylis, 204. Dactyloporus, 494. . Dalea, 25. Dalibarda, 223. Danza, 275. : Danthonia, 202, 239, 342, 478. + 492- Piasysseinn:; 483. Datura, 53, 236. Daucus, 52, 234. Decodon, 228, 234. Delphinium, 294, 493- Dendrograptus, 414. Dermodium, 81. Deschampsia, 201, 342. Desmidium, 244. Desmodium, 304. | Diachza, 80. Dianthera, 25, 65. Dianthus, 232, 343, 344- Dichromena, 30>. Dicksonia, 67, 239, 465, 478. . Dicliptera, 269. Dicranella, 273, 378- Dicranodontium, 86. Dicranoweisia, 273. | Dicranum, 378, 410. Dictyanthus, 348. Sea Dictyophyton, 95. : Dictyosiphon, tog. Dictyosphzrium, 244. Didymium, 29, 77, 78, 81, 82. Didymopanax, 497. Dimerosporium, 341. Dilatris, 472. Diodia, 53, 483. Diodonta, 281. Dionza, 25, 26, 83, 84, 321- Vili Discopleura, 229, 234- Disporum, 475, 480. Distichlis, 204. Ditrichum, 112, 113, 115, 117. Docidium, 244. Dodecatheon, 301. Draba, 500. Dracocephalum, 241. Draparnaldia, 376. Drosera, 59, 62, 228, 234, 409, 497. Drymaria, 304, 343. Dryopteris, 67, 239, 462, 463, 478. Dulichium, 66, 238, 479. Dupontia, 342. Eatonia, 202, 203. Echinocactus, 84. Echinocereus, 450. - Echinops, 287. Echinospermum, 53 Echinostelium, 80. Prashse 53. ctocarpus, 109. Ehretia, 88. 554 Eichornia, 498. Eleagnus, 225. Elatine, 230, 232, 285. Eleocharis, 56, 66, 238, 409, 479, 499- Elephantopus, 484. leusine, 202, 478. Elliottia, 319. Ellisia, 302. Elodea, 377. Elodes, 232, 376. Elymus, 207, 342, 478, 495. Emmenanthe, 375, 493. Encelia, 304. Eniantiophylla, 305, Encyonema, 245. Enerthenema, 80 Enteridium, 76, 364. Entyloma, 252. Epidendrum, 121, 133. Epigza, 64, 84, 133. Epilobium, 27, 62, 234, 241, 276, 409, 410, 482. Epipactis, 32, 34, 35, 186, 189, 192, 440. Epiphegus, 483. Epithemia, 245. Equisetum, 67, 230, 239, 377. . Eragrostis, 203, 239, 242, 443, 478, 495. _ Erechthites, 53, 63, 235, 484. Eremocrinum, 301. _Erianthus, 197, 225, 477 Erigeron, 53, 3> 2352 344, 484. iocaulon, 59,66. ~ Eriogonum, 493. Eriophorum, 228, 238, 283. _ Eriophyllum, 344. ium, 52. _ Eryngium, 304, 500. Eucheuma, tog. Eunanus, 493. Eunotia, 245. Euonymus, 165, 482. Eupatorium, 2, 5, 6, 7, 16, 58, 62, 131, 234, 269, 344, 378, 432+ 475, 477» 484. Euphorbia, 27, 54, 65, 237, 304, 481. Euphrasia, 223. Eurhynchium, 274. Eurygania, 137. Eutypella, 341. _ _Exobasidium, 364, 437, 438, 439- Exolobus, 171. : Fagopyrum, 65, 443. Fagus, 42, 43, 164, 166, 480. Falcata, 481. Ferula, 94. Festuca, 204, 205, 206, 242, 304, 342, 409, 495- Fimbriaria, 301. Fimbristemma, 348. Fimbristylis, 414, 479. Fissidens, 378. Forsellesia, 493. Fouquiera, 28. Fragaria, 230, 233. Fragilaria, 95, 246. Frasera, 302, 493. Fritillaria, 344. Frullania, 378. Fuchsia, 88, 269. Fucoides, 367, 4:2, 453. Fucus, 108, 229. Fulgio, 82. Fumaria, 61. Fusarium, 250, 341, 489. Gaillardia, 340. Galax, 85, 477, 483. Galinsoga, 268, 303. Galium, 62, 234, 241, 294, 409, 475, 483. Garugandra, 224. Gaultheria, 64, 138, 139. Gaultieria, 482. Gaura, 223. Gaylussacia, 64, 230, 235, 437, 477, 482, 407. Geissanthus, 140. Gentiana, 64, 94, 269. Georgia, 494, 50r. Geranium, 61, 230, 341. Gerardia, 64, 236. Geum, 62, 135. Gilia, 378, 493, 495, 500 Glaucidium, 225. Gleditschia, 160, 161, 167, 224. Gleichenia, 407, 436. Gleosporium, 109, 110, 246, 247, 248, 249, 250, 300. Gloiocephala, 342. : Glossopetalon, 493. Glyceria, 205, 342. Glycyrrhiza, 241. Glyptodendron, 413, 414. Gnaphalium, 6, 59, 63, 83, 235, 280, 475, 484. Gomphocarpus, 276. Gomphonema, 245. Gonium, 246. Goodyera, 34, 188, 189. Gossypium, 386, 495. Gratiola, 64. Grimmia, 113, 114, 115. Grindelia, 241. Griselinia, 133. Goniopteris, 95. Guettarda, 348, 451. ocladus, 159, 161, 167, 168. Gymnocoronis, 287, 378. Gymnosporangium, 132, 443, 499: » 186, 188, 192, 230, 237, 480. Gypsophila, 240, 343, 344. Habenaria, 33, 36, 37, 38, 39, 66, 186, 190, 192,228 237, 259, 260, 268, 302 » 468, Maduutchies, 442. ie 376 - Halenia, 269. Halesia, 451, 493, 495. Hamadryas, 225. Hamamelis, 165, 481. Hartwrightia, 287, 288. Hauya, 88. Lema 65, 236, 338, 483. 2 337- ; Helenium, 1, 3, 4, 6,8, 16, 484. Heleochloa, 199. Helonias, 295. Helianthella, 305. Helianthemum, 232, 482, 496. Helianthus, 2, 9, 12, 17, 235, 416, 484. Heliconia, 343. Heliopsis, 5, 6, 12, 17, 484. Helleborine, 33, 35. Helminthostachys, 357. Helonias, 263. ~ Hemiarcyria, 81, 304. Hemicarpha, 414. Hemidyctium, 492. Hemitones, 93. Hepatica, 60, 443- Heracleum, 234. Herberta, 378. Heritiera, 472. Herniaria, 282. . Heterodictyon, 79. Heterophyllza, 430. Heterosporium, 224. Heterotrichia, 81. Heuchera, 476, 481, 495. evea, 499. Hexalectris, 186, 188, 192. Hibiscus, 52, 230, 341. Hicoria, 178, 281, 413. Hieracium, 6, 53, 63, 120, 1775 235» 342, 484. Hoffmannia, 348. Hoffmanseggia, 223. Hohenbergia, 275. Holcus, 201, 239, 475, 478- Holomitrium, 378. Homalocenchrus, 197, 239, 478. Hordeum, 207. = Houstonia, 253, 474, 476, 483. Hufelandia, 497. Humulus, 237. Hyalotheca, 244. Hydrangea, 62, 481. Hydrastis, 225, 475, 480. Hydrocotyle, 62. Hydropeltis, 60. Hymenocallis, 470. Hymenophyllum, 436. Hyophila, 378. Hypericum, 57, 61, 223, 232, 482: Hypheene, 262. Hypolepis, 27. Hypopitys, 64. _ Hypnea, 109. Hypnum, 274. Hypocherris, 294. Hypoxylon, 296. Hystrix, 66, 207, 342, 475, 478. Icacorea, 377. llex, 58, 59, 61, 228, 233, 362, 414, 482. Ilysanthes, 64, 483. Impatiens, 61, 230, 233, 409, 482. Incolaria, 303. Inocybe, 264. Inula, 5, 6, 8, 16. loxylon; 163. Ipomeea, 25, 27, 53, 85, 258. Iris, 56, 66, 228, 236, 237, 376, 467-_ nthus, 483. Ischnosiphon, 268, 415. Isopyrum, 60, 305. um, 274. Ivesia, 94. uglans, 65, 165, 300, 340. 175. i Lotus, 493, 496- eas Ludwigia, 234, 482. : ; é & Juncus, 59, 66, 238, 242, 409, 453» 4775479» 499- ungermannia, 86, 308, 309,310. 1X Juniperus, 46, 366, 452. Jussiza, 174, 482. Kalmia, 64, 135, 235, 482. Keerlia, 493. Keeleria, 202. Keellia, 65, 482. Klotzschia, 497. Krugia, 414. Krynitzkia, 269. Kuhnia, 173. Kyllingia, 479. Lachnanthes, 472. Lactuca, 1, 3, 5,6, 15, 17, 53, 63, 235, 484. Laminaria, 229. Lamproderma, 77, 80. Laphamia, 413. Laportea, 480. Lappula, 175, 443- Lapula, 175. Lathyrus, 56, 61, 133, 223, 230, 233, 262, 274. Laurus, 46, 345. Lecania, 85. Lecanora, 351, 352, 354, 355- 2 Lecanosperma, 430, 434. Lechea, 61, 475, 482. Lecidea, 85 35%, 355. Leersia, 27. Legouzia, 175. Leiophyllum, 85. Lemna, 238 : Lenzites, 296. Leonurus, 54, 236. 4 Lepidium, 52, 61, 223, 232, 240, 413, 493. Lepidozia, 307, 308, 310, a Lepiota, 264. t Lepismium, 268. } Leptodontium, 378. Leptogium, 354. ' Leptorchis, 32, 34, 65, 476, 480. Leptostachya, 175. Leptosyne, 88, 94, 416. Leptosphezria, 442. [ eptotrichum, 273. Leptotznia, 88 Leskea, 274. za, O, 174, 230, 294, 481, 499- Leuconymphea, 175. Leucampyx, 94. Leucobryum, 87. Leucophyllum, 340. Leucothoé, 166. Lewisia, 135. Liabum, 378. Liatris, 496. Licea, 79. a 409, 496. Lilza, 340. Lilium, 66. Limodorum, 33, 34, 35, 121, 122, 186, 189, 192. Limnanthemum, 230, 236. Linaria, 54, 236, 252, 443- Linbladia, 79. Lindera, 295, 480. Linnza, 409. Linum, 239, 233, 481. Liparis, 186, 187, 192. Liriodendron, 60, 169, 345. ; Listera, 31, 32, 34, 185, 186, 188, 190, 191, 192. Lithospermum, 254. ; Litsza, 30. ‘ Lobelia, 63, 231, 235, 269, 347) 477» 483, 484. Leeflingia, 343, 344. Lolium, 206. Lonicera, 162, 167, 223. Lo » 85. ee Lupinus, 132, 262, 304, 305, 412. Luzula, 223. Lychnis, 240, 343, Lycogala, 75, 81. Lycopodium, 67, 239. Lycopus, 65, 236, 204, 483. Lycopersicum, 126, Lygodium, 466. Lysimachia, 64, 223, 235, 476, 483. Macbridea, 321. Macromitrium, 378. Macrosporium, 392. Madia, 412, 413. Magnolia, 245, 362, 474, 475, 480, 501. chra, 133. ‘Malacothrix, 301, 338. Malaxis, 36. Mallostoma, 348. Malva, 52, 232, 338, 341, 490. Malvastrum, 416. Malveopsis, 416. Mamillaria, 86, 174, 342, 415, 452. Marasmus, 442. Marattia, 366. Mariscus, 175. Marliera, 415. Marsilia, 141, 147. Masdevallia, 496. Matricaria, 413. Manritia, 262. ote sme 66, ee i 0, 52, 130, 230, 233. Madutices, abet, - Megalonectria, 296. Megalopteris, 275. Meibomia, 61, 230, 253, 475, 481. Melampyrum, 64. Melandrium, 240. Melica, 203, 342, 495. Melilotus, 52, 61, 84, 2335 341. Melissa, 65, 231, 236, 483. Melocactus, 86. Melosira, 246. Mendonica, 412. Menispermum, 481. Mentha, 65, 236, 241, 338. Mentzelia, 343. Menyanthes, 230, 236, 409. Meridion, 246. reat 263. esogloia, 109. Methaphacdne THOMAS: ‘MORONG BULLET LN OF THE TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB. Vol. XX. New York City and Lancaster, Pa., February 15, 1893. No. 2. A new Species of Listera, with Notes on other Orchids. By THOMAS MoRONG, LIsTERA BOREALIS, n. sp.—Stems very delicate, 3/-5’ high, gla- brous below, glandular pubescent and with long, silky, scattered hairs among the inflorescence, sheathed by 2 obtuse, mem- branous scales at the base; roots thickened, somewhat fleshy ; leaves oval, slightly sheathing, obtuse at the apex, 4’’-8” long, 2’’-4’"’ broad, entire, bearing on the surface a few silky hairs, otherwise very glabrous. Raceme 2 or 3 flowered. Bracts scarcely 1’’ long, much shorter than the pedicels. Sepals and petals nearly equal, linear, obtuse, about 2” long. Lip 4/’-5’” long, 2” broad at the obtuse apex, ciliolate above; apical lobes very obtuse, 1/” long, the intermediate tooth obsolete; basal lobes %4” long, very obtuse. Column slightly incurved, 114” long. Flowers greenish-yellow, the lip with a purplish mid- dle, and purplish nerves radiating into the apical lobes. The flowers and column, as well as the leaves and upper stem bear the silky hairs mentioned, some of which are 2” long. Collected by Miss E. Taylor at Fort Smith, Slave River, Hud- son Bay Territory, June 28, 1892. Self-fertilization. Darwin seems inclined to think, if he does not absolutely assert, that all orchids are unable to fertilize themselves, and that appears to be the prevalent view to-day. That imsect agency is impera- tively needed in many cases is doubtless true. The structure of the floral organs in a large number of species is such that it is clearly impossible for the pollen to reach its own stigma without : artificial aid. The rostellum often very effectually interposes be- tween the anther cells and the stigmatic cavity. There is, however, ‘More than one species in which the means of self-fertilization are USL} PE re 32 provided, and plenty of proof that this does take place. The plants have two strings to their bow, and one or both may be used as a means of securing offspring, as in many Naiadacee both propagating buds and seeds are produced, so that if one method fails the other may be employed. It is not always true that the pollen is so firmly agglutinated that its grains can be separated only by a considerable force. In Lepéorchis, for instance, the pollen masses are very loosely granular, without caudicles, glands or connecting threads, and the grains are easily detached by the wind or rain, and therefore liable to be conveyed to their own stigma by such agitation. What serves to show that in this genus self-fertilization is common is the fact that our two species produce an abundance of ripe capsules which is not generally true in other genera where insect agency is absolutely necessary. JL. /iliifolia frequently occurs in our Northern woods and nearly every plant that I have collected in the latter part of the season is well fur- nished with fruit. This is equally the case with the several species of Achroanthes. In several of the genera which are destitute of caudicles and glands, I have had occasion to observe the pollen dust scattered over the lip, column and stigma precisely as I have seen the pollen of willows scattered over the inflorescence, suggest- ing an analogous distribution. Another very interesting method of self-fertilization is related by Sir Jos. Hooker in a paper which _ he read before the Royal Society of London, in 1854. The plant which he has under review, is Listera ovata, a British species very like our L. cordata. He found that if the rostellum is touched or irritated when the pollen is ripe a sort of explosion occurs and | two white viscid masses are instantly protruded, one from each side of the apex, which coalesce and attach themselves to the bases of the pollinia, and draw them out of their cases. The pollen, he says, is by this means broken up, and the grains fall — over the edge of the rostellum upon the stigmatic surface. Here is a case which, while not at all preventing the plant from being fertilized in the ordinary way by insects, clearly shows that the means of self-fertilization is specially provided for. Now in the allied genera, Gyrostachys, Peramium, Epipactis, Cathea, Arethusa — and Pogonia, while no irritability of this kind has so far been ob- s served, yet the caudicular discs are attached so firmly to the back _ 33 of the rostellum that by bending it downwards the pollinia are drawn out of their cases and. broken up. Supposing an insect crawling upon the rostellum or any other weight to perform this act, some of the pollen grains are pretty sure to be thrown upon their own stigmas. In the three first mentioned of these genera, at least, we find the species maturing an abundance of fruit, which in a measure confirms the idea that self-fertilization often takes place. But there is stronger evidence of the fact of self-fertiliza- tion in several species of Hadenaria. In H. tridentata, the rostel- lum, instead of being as in most species of Hladenaria, a solid shield interposing between the anther cells and a deep stigmatic cavity lying far underneath, is split into three club-shaped columns, standing one on each side of the cells and one between them, ris- ing to a level with the cells. The upper and inner surfaces of the two lateral columns are viscid and evidently stigmatic. The pollen is powdery and within easy reach of these contiguous stigmas. Curiously enough, too, when the anther cells dehisce, these stig- matic columns contract on their inner side, and may be said actually to lean over and help themselves to the pollen. Asa matter of fact the columns are known often to be penetrated even in the unopened flower by pollen tubes (Gray’s Man. Ed. 6, page 506), and they have been found still more common in the mature flower. This structure occurs to a greater or less degree in the allied species, H. integra and FH. nivea. With such facts as these before us, we should be cautious how we limit all Orchidaceous Species to a single mode of fertilization. Nomenclature. Calopogon, R. Br. in Ait. Hort. Kew. Ed. 2, v. 204 (1813). This name is antedated by Cathea, Salisbury in Trans. Hort. Soc. i. 300 (1812), and by Limodorum, L. Gen. Pl. Ed. 2, 829 (1742), as well as by Helleborine, Martyn (1736). Kuntze, Revisio Generum Plantarum, 665, adopts the last name as having the right of prior- ity, but, taking as our starting point in nomenclature, the first edi- tion of Linnaeus’ Species Plantarum, 1753, we cannot follow him. Limodorum must be dropped also, because Ludwig (Definitiones Generum Plantarum, 1 737) had anticipated the Linnzan name of 1742 by adopting Limodorum from Tournefort, in application toa _ different genus from that of Linnaeus. Therefore, we must drop _ 34 both Calopogon and Limodorum and apply Salisbury’s name to the Northern species, which will accordingly stand as follows: CATHEA TUBEROSA (L). Limodorum tuberosum, L. Sp. Pl. 950 (1753). Cathea pulchella, Salisb. Trans. Hort. Soc. i. 300 (1812). Calopogon pulchellus, R. Br. in Ait. Hort. Kew. Ed. 2, v., 204 (1813), and later authors. Listera, R. Br—Kuntze has adopted Rafinesque’s name “ Diphyllum” as anterior to Listera. The word originally mis- spelled “ Diphryllum,” and several times subsequently in Ra- finesque’s published writings, Kuntze seems to think should be re- tained inthis form on that account, but Rafinesque himself spells it correctly in his “ Herdarium Rafinesquianum,’ and there seems to be no good reason why an evident misspelling should not be cor- rected. It is, however, inadmissible as a substitute for Lzszera, as the description given by Rafinesque in Rep. N. Y. Med. Repos., 2nd Hexade v., 357,(1808), clearly shows. He speakes of his plant as having “ 2 interior petals. . . bifid; lip acute, entire; capsule filiform,’ which is entirely inapplicable to any of our published species. There is preserved in the library of the New York Academy of Science a curious old volume of proof plates of vari- ous species drawn by Rafinesque, among which is a drawing of this plant, the figure of which corresponds exactly to the author's description. What plant was meant it is impossible to say, but it is evidently not a species of our Listera. Stine! the nime of Brown holds good. Spiranthes, Richard, 1818, must give way to Gyrostachys of Persoon, 1807, as has been well shown by Kuntze, and our species known as Sfiranthes should be classed under the older name. es Probably Kuntze is also correct in displacing Liparis, Richard 1818, by Leptorchis, Du Petit-Thouars, 1809, but I have not been able to get hold of the work cited by Kuntze (Nouv. Bull. Soc. Phil. 314-19) and cannot verify his date. . Goodyera R. Br. (1813) is antedated by Orchiodes, Siegesbeck, | 1737 (Supp. 13) and by Peramium of Salisbury (Trans. Hort. Soc. _ i. 301) 1812. Under our rules Peramium must be substituted for Goodyera. Epipactis—The history of this name is a curious one, showing : 35 how tangled is the synonymy when we come to search for priority. Kuntze in the volume already referred to cites Ludwig's name Limodorun as the original under his system of nomenclature, but that acute author has made a palpable mistake, for Ludwig adopts the name from Tournefort and a reference to Tournefort’s description and figure shows very clearly that he means a spurred plant belonging to the genus Orchis, and Ludwig himself (Def. Gen. Pl. Ed 2, 213) describes it as having a spur, which Lpipactis has not. Linnzus in his description of Orchis, Gen. Pl. n. 681, correctly cites Tournefort’s Limodorum as the same as his Orvchis. Linnzus’ Serapias (Gen. Pl. n. 683), which equals //e//eborine, Tour- nefort, included several genera, among them our Z/ipaciis, the origi- nal name being retained by Bentham and Hooker for several Medi- terranean species. Haller in 1742 (Enum. Stirp. i. 277) constituted the genus Epipactis, followed by Crantz in 1769, Allioni in 1785, and others. Richard afterwards still farther divided the genus, calling the plants without glands Cephalanthera. So that we have the three genera, Serapias, Epipactis and Cephalanthera, each of them legitimately applied to the species now bearing those names. The species of Epipactis occurring in Northeastern North America, should be designated as follows: E. viriprrtora (Hoff) Serapias viridifiora, Hoff. Deutsch. FI. ii. 182 (1800). E. latifolia, var. viridiffora, Irm. in Linnza xvi., 451 (1842). E. virdiflora, Reich. Fl. Exc. 134 (1830). £. Helleborine, var. viridens, Asa Gray, Bot. Gaz. iv. 206 (1879). E. Helleborine, A. Gray, Man. Ed. 6, 504, (1890) not Crantz. Dr, Gray in the volume of the Botanical Gazette referred to, notic- ing the recent discovery of the plant at Syracuse, New York, states that it is “exactly the Z. viridifiora of Reichenbach, well figured in the Icones Florae Germanic which peculiar as it seems to be, is reduced by Irmisch to a variety of £. Helleborine.” Singularly ‘nough, he at the same time adopts Crantz’ varietal name (Z. Helle- borine, var. viridans.) Probably this was because he regarded the Plant as essentially equivalent to the £. /atifolia of Europe, which Linnzus had named Serapias Helleborine, var. latifolia, but the two are quite dissimilar, and Reichenbach had good reason for separ- ating them. “Our plant differs from that in having narrower, _ Ae ane, prea 36 longer and more tapering sepals, a lip destitute of tubercles or callosities or lobes on either the upper or lower part, all of which characters occur in the European &. /at#folia. So decided is the difference upon close inspection that I have no hesitation in fol- lowing Reichenbach and adopting Hoffman’s name, &. viridi- flora, notwithstanding the fact that the specific name is not well chosen to indicate the color of the flowers. Three stations are now known for this plant. In addition to those near Syracuse and at Buffalo New York, another has recently been found at Toronto, Canada. Microstylis—Nuttall’s section of Malaxis known under. this name, as has been shown by Prof. Greene, is antedated by Ra- finesque’s name, Achroanthes, and our Northern North Ameri- can forms become: A. MONOPHYLLA (L.), Greene, Pitt. ii., 183 (1891). Ophrys monophylla, L. Sp. Pl. 947 (175 3). ' Microstylis monophylla, Lindl. Bot. Reg. t. 1290 (1829). A. UNIFOLIA (Mx.),- Raf. Med. Rep. 2d Hex. v. 352 (1808). Malaxis unifolia, Mx. Fl. ii. 157 (1803). _ Microstylis ophioglossoides, Nutt. Gen. ii. 196 (1818). | Habenaria ciliaris and H. blzephariglottis——So far as I can see, the specific difference between these two forms can hardly be maintained. According to Michaux, who seems to have been the first to mention the white colored plant, it is merely a white va- riety of HZ. ciliaris, and this judgment appears correct. Dr. Asa Gray, in the Annals of the Lyceum of Natural History of New — York, ili., 231, says that the two species “grow in similar situations and frequently in company, and are not readily distinguished ex- cept by the color of the flowers. But, as Prof. Hooker justly re- marks in H. ciliaris, the lip is more thickly fringed, and the upper — petals are likewise fringed; whereas in 7. b/ephariglottis these are — quite naked.” Numerous specimens of the two species in the — Columbia College Herbarium show that the lip varies in both | species from loosely to thickly fringed, and is the same identically — in shape. If it were the fact that in the one the petals are fringed © and in the other not, that might serve to distinguish them, but it — is now well known that the petal of d/ephariglottis are commonly _ as much fringed as in ciliaris. It is vay in | var. 37 holopetala, Torr., that the petals are entire, and I find many speci- mens of this species which show on the same plant all grades of petals from entire to cut-toothed and fringed. So that no de- pendence can be placed on the constancy of this character. The very confusion into which authors have fallen in regard to these two species is significant. Willdenow, the author of the name dlephariglottis (Sp. Pl. iv. 9, 1805), observes “very similar to ciliaris, but the narrow lip, the length of the highest petal and slightly ciliate. The corolla seems to be yellow.” Dr. Torrey, in his Compendium of 1826, briefly describes them, and the descrip- tion of either applies perfectly well to the other, except that the one is called “bright yellow” and the other “ pure white.” Hooker (Exot. Bot. t. 87), calls the var. holopetala “ Habenaria blephari- Slottis,’ and Lindley names it “ Platanthera holopetala,’ upon which Torrey (FI, N. Y., ii. 277), who gives altogether the best descrip- tion of the two species, remarks: “I certainly agree with Sir Wil- liam Hooker in considering P. holopetala of Lindley as only a variety of this (d/ephariglottis) species, which again scarcely differs from the following (ciliaris) except in the white flowers, Lindley has even a white variety of P. carts.” Chapman reduces it to Al. ciliaris, var. blephariglottis. Lindley, in his Gen. and Sp. of Orchids, seems to hice Be matters badly, evidently knowing the species imperfectly. After converting Orchis blephariglottis, Willd., into Platanthera holopetala, , he describes Platanthera ciliaris under two varieties, Viz., var. 4. with yellow flowers, which he attributes to Alabama, and var. , with white flowers, which he attributes to Canada. It is to this that Torrey refers. Lindley could distinguish his olopetala from ciliaris only by its entire petals, which, as I have shown, is an in- constant character. So far as color goes, even if color alone were a sufficient ground for specific distinction, which it is not, I find in the Herbarium on sheets of undoubted cig, Mates Siena labels from different collectors marked, « flowers, lemon yellow,” and “ flowers, lemon yellow, varying to cizaris.” A careful comparison of the flowers in the two forms, as shown : in the large collection at Columbia College, renders the following © arrangement the most satisfactory : oo a ang ciliaris se R. Br. in Ait. Hort. Kew. Ed. Pe v. 194 ay a 13) ee ee : 38 Orchis ciliaris L. Sp. Pl. 939 (1753). Mx. FI. ii. 156 (1803). Platanthera ciliaris, Lind\. Orchid., 292 (Aug. 1835). Var. ALBA (Mx). Orchis ciliaris, var. alba, Mx. F. ii. 156 (1803). O. blephariglottis, Willd. Sp. Pl. iv. 9 (1805). Platanthera blephariglottis, Torr. Fl. N. Y. ii. 277 (1843). Habenaria ciliaris, v. blephariglottis, Chap. Fl. 460 (1860). Var. HOLOPETALA (Lindl). Platanthera holopetala Lindl. Gen. and Sp. Orch. 291 (Aug,, 1835). | Habenaria blephariglottis, Hook. Exot. Fl. t. 87 (1825). P. blephariglottis, v. holopetala, Torr. Fl. N.Y. ii. 277 (14843). In this connection it is a matter of interest to note an irregu- — lar or monstrous form of AH. ciliaris which was collected in the vicinity of New York during the last summer by Mr. Henry Og- den. The lip is either entire or imperfectly fringed and obovate, instead of being as in the normal form, long and deeply fringed and long ovate. In some of the flowers the anther cells are 4, in pairs, 2 parallel cells on one side, and 2 on the other; and in some cases there is another cell besides, back of one of the others, In some instances the lateral tubercle or swelling of the clinan- drium is mounted upon one of the cells, or partly displaces its - lower portion. Most of the flowers are entirely destitute of spurs. Some have spurs as long as the ovary, and a few have spurs not a quarter as long as the ovary. This species frequently produces only a leaf the first year, flow- ering the second year. As a result, the collector is often disap- pointed upon going to a locality and finding no flowers where he found an abundance the year before. I have detected a similar habit in other species. Habenaria flava—Dr. Asa Gray examined the Herbarium of Gronovius containing the plant upon which Linnzeus founded this species, and ascertained beyond a doubt that it is the same as that which has since been called Hadenaria virescens. (See Am. Jour. — Sci. & Arts, xxxvii. 307.) The history of its synonymy is a good _ illustration of the manner in which some plants under the old meth-_ = ods of nomenclature have travelled about from es” to post. Dr. = 39 Gray, in the article referred to, gives an outline of the synonymy up to 1840. It appears as O. virescens, Willd. Sp. Pl. 4, 37 (1805); as FHabenaria herbiola, R. Br. in Ait. Hort. Kew. Ed. 2. v. 193, (1813 ); as O. flava and O. fuscescens in Pursh (1814), and O. ézdentata in El- liott (1824). It was subsequently named Platanthera herbiola by Lindley in his Gen, et. Sp. Orchid., H. herdiola and, as a synonym, HT. virescens, by Sprengel in his Systema, and then Platanthera flava by Dr. Torrey, Bot. N. Y., and by Dr. Gray in the first edition of his Manual. Had Dr. ies abided by the opinion expressed in his article in the American Journal of Science, in which he says “the specific name is certainly not happily chosen for a plant of which Clayton observes “ floribus obsolete lutets,” but it must never- theless be retained,’ all would have been well. In spite of this sound dictum, however, in his Manual, Ed. 5, 499, (1867) he rebaptizes the plantas “ Hadenaria virescens, Spreng,” adopting Sprengel’s synonym. This he does, apparently, because “the flowers are not yellow,” though why he should have disregarded Sprengel’s name HW. Aeréiola, and the still older H. herbiola of R. Br. is not clear. In the sixth edition of the Manual the same name, “ virescens, Spreng,’ is continued. Besides all this topsy- turvy, the species has had several other aliases. It is easy to see why our plant synonymy is in such a state of confusion when we find authors following their own caprices in substituting new names for old ones. Stability can be secured only by adhering firmly to _ the principle of priority, no matter what we may think of the ap- Propriateness of the first specific name. The species should there- fore be named: Habenaria flava, (L.) Gray, Am. Jour. Sci. and Arts, xxxvii, 308 (1840). Orchis flava, 1. Sp. Pl. 942, (175 3), Cypripedium.—A single change in the names of our North American species should be noted. C. regine, Walt. Fl. Car. 222 (1 788). C. album,—Ait. Hort. Kew. iii. 303 (1789). C. spectabile,Salisb. Trans. Linn. Soc. i. 78. t. 3, f. 3 (179%), - and later authors. 40 On Legitimate Authorship of Certain Binomials with Other Notes on Nomenclature. By Geo. B. SUDWORTH. Among our North American trees are several species which bear names the authors of which custom, or a desire not to of- fend the memory of faithful explorers and collectors, has long held to be legitimate. In other words we have on record and in com- mon use, names attributed to authors, who, although knowing them thoroughly, never described the species to which they ap- plied the name. Many such designations appear for the first time as bare catalogue names or in narratives, and have been taken up and ascribed to their originators in some cases with small ground for knowing to what plant the writer applied the name. Closely re- lated to this class of names are those with general notes or re- marks on plant features possessed by several species in common, and rendering it exceedingly unsafe to judge of what species the author had in hand. Plant descriptions are highly unsatisfactory and uncertain (without figures) when most carefully drawn, especi- ally with variable and closely related forms; but still less tenable are names founded upon no attempted description and upon such running remarks as “used for a yellow dye;” “a beautiful pine ;” “a tall tree.” A few European collectors named our plants in the field, send- ing their specimens to home herbaria where on examination in a single place one might on seeing the plant with its appended label know what species the collector met, but which in the first pub- lished account of his journey is mentioned only by name. Fol- lowing such lack of published data, painstaking botanists have later figured and described the same species, taking up, with the discoverer as the authority, the originally applied name. But > : who, in such cases, is the one responsible to the world of botanists at large for the validity of the name? Presumably, and in ac- cordance with the requirements.of properly publishing a species, the discoverer is not; for the botanists at large who cannot ex- amine the original specimen, kept in a single herbarium, would never have known what manner of plant was meant, except from the one who described it and published it in some circulating : 41 medium. The discoverer is not, however, defrauded of his just dues in not being cited as the author of a species which he named but did not characterize; the graver responsibility of establishing the species must rest with the describer; for it is to him that the botanist looks for the characters of the plant. Moreover, knowing that no one is legitimately the author of a binomial by merely en- umerating a bare name, it is wilfully misleading to quote Jones in our synonymy for a species when we find the characters of the plant not published under his name and by him, but subsequently published by Smith. A similar case is not that of a botanist who names and draws up the characters of his plant, transmitting his manuscript to some publishing monographer, as a part of a larger contribution. It is eminently proper in such cases, as law and custom has held, to credit the original describer. The following cases are examples of plant names attributed to authors who named the plants they discovered, but described them either insufficiently or not at all. Pinus ponderosa, Douglas, long attributed to David Douglas, who discovered the tree between the Columbia and Spokane riv- ers, Washington, in 1826, was named by this explorer (Hooker's Companion Bot. Mag. ii. 111, 141, 1836) Pinas ponderosa, but he nowhere described it. Douglas’ name is therefore a nomen nudum- Two years later though (1838) Loudon (Arboretum et Frut. iv. 2243) figured and described the Bull Pine for the first time, erron- cously I believe, appending “Douglas” to Pinus ponderosa, as Douglas left only a written iabel accompanying his specimens de- posited in the Herbarium of the London Horticultural Society. Strictly, therefore, the name should be written P. ponderosa, Lou- don. It is of the greatest interest in this connection, however, to note that Douglas’ specimen (figured by Loudon, I. c.,) gives the type and locality of this variable species, which is of value in Studying the other forms already separated from the type by Engelmann and others. Pinus Sabiniana, Douglas (Comp. Bot. Mag. ii. 150, 1836) _ printed, however, Pinus Sabinii is a nomen nudum, and the species: was published first by Lambert (Gen. Pinus, iii. 1 137; t. 58, 1837), | é who should be cited as the author. he The following eypeny ine» are also nomina cilia : Pinus grandis, 42 Douglas (1. c. 147) = Abies grandis, Lindley, being published with characters for first time by Hooker (Fl. Bor. Am. ii. 163, 1840); Pinus amabilis, Douglas (1. c. 93) = Adies amatilis, Forbes, estab- lished first by Antoine (Conif. 63, 1840); and Pinus nobilis, Douglas (I. c. 147, 1836) = Adies nobilis, Lindley, established by Lambert (Pinus iii. 167,1837). The latter case was correctly understood by Koch (Dendrol. ii. pt. 2, 209), who placed P. nobilis, Douglas, at the bottom of his list of synonyms, when, if well founded, it should not have been preceded by Loudon's Picea nodilis of later date (1838). Similar, but difficult cases to touch are such as Pinus contorta (Douglas Mss. in Herb. Lond. Hort. Soc.) London iv. 2292; and £, insignis (Douglas 1. c.) Loudon 1. c. 2265. As is clear, so far as Douglas is concerned, these names are zomina nuda, and should, if treated critically, be attributed to Loudon, who published them ; credit for coining the names being given to Douglas in the his- torical synonymy of the species. Abies concolor, Lindley & Gordon (in Journ. Hort. Soc. Lond. Vv. 210; Nov 15; 1850), is a name accompanied by no description, but founded on “ Pinus concolor, Engelm.,”’ which at that time was only an herbarium name, and not published till 1868 (Parlat. in DeCandolle Prodr. xvi. Pt. 2, 426). The A. concolor of Lindley & Gordon must therefore be considered a nomen nudum, which it is in fact. The first properly published name applied to this fir is the Picea concolor of Gordon (Pinetum 155, 1858), and the com- ~ bination Adies concolor must be attributed to Parry (Am. Nat. ix. 204, 1875), who described the species sufficiently to establish the name. His running characterization of Adies concolor is some- what meagre, but if carefully weighed can apply only to the White Fir, in which case Parry becomes the author of Adies concolor (Gord.)= Picea concolor (Gordon, 1. c. 18 58). The following names, at present treated as synonyms, seem to — warrant restoration as the oldest for the species: Fagus ferruginea, Aiton (Hortus Kew. iii. 362, 1789). There is no doubt but that Marshall sets forth the essential characters of © the Beech under “Fagus, the Beech Tree” (Arbustum Am. 45), : designating our species as Fagus sylvatica atro-punicea, “« Ameti- can Beech Tree” (|. c. 46, 1785), in the light of which Aiton’s 43 later name should be replaced by Marshall’s, which was published four years earlier. The name for the American Beech would then become Fagus atropunicea (Marsh.) =f. sylvatica atro-punicea, Marsh. (I. c. 1785)= F. ferruginea, Aiton (1. c. 1789). Carpinus Caroliniana, Walter (Flora Car. 238, 1788). The first name applied to this species is that of Marshall, Carpinus Setulus Virginiana (Arbustum Am. 25, 1785), antedating Walter's name by three years. There can be no reasonable doubt as to what - plant Marshall applied his name, either as shown in his diagnosis of the genus Carpinus or in his description of the “American — Hornbeam.” Walter’s long-established—but misapplied—specific name Caroliniana should, therefore, give place to Marshall's earlier —but .equally misapplied—Virginiana, the name for the Blue Beech then becoming Carpinus Virginiana (Marsh.)=C. Betulus Virginiana, Marshall (I. c. 1785)=C. Caroliniana, Walter (1. c. 1788) =C. Americana, Lam. (Encycl. iv. 708, 1797). Salix lasiandra, var. Fendleriana, Bebb. (Bot. Calif. ii. 84, 1880), Nuttall appears to have been the first tu describe this Western willow, under the name Salix pentandra, var. caudata (Sylva i. 61, t. 18, 1842), a name which is commonly cited as a Synonym of var. /endleriana. Prof. Bebb’s reason, if any exists, for not maintaining the older varietal name for this plant is un- known to us at present; but as it is well known to be the original name, it seems desirable to now reinstate Nuttall’s var. cauvdata, which would give S. lasiandra, var. caudata (Nutt)= S. pentendra, var. caudata, Nuttall (1. c., 1842)== S. dasiandra var. Fendleriana, Bebb (I. ¢., 1880). : Populus monilifera, Aiton (Hort. Kew. iii. 406, 1789). Mar- shall describes a tree under the name Populus deltoide(Arbustum Am., 106, 1 785), which cannot be ignored as inapplicable to one of our Eastern Poplars. Koch (Dendrologie ii. Pt. 1, 487), doubt-_ fully referred Marshall’s species (corrected to “deltoides”’) to Popu- lus grandidentata, Michx., and later Prof. Sargent makes ita syno- nym of P. monilifera,a decision which, we believe, is correct. For — S a careful examination of the various forms and stages of leafde- velopment of this cottonwood does not require imagination to reconcile Marshall’s description of this tree. The geographical a range indicated by him is, moreover, in accordance with what is 44 known to be true, and certainly applies only in part to the Large- toothed Aspen. In this event Marshall's Populus deltoide(s) (1785) should replace Aiton’s P. monilifera (1789). Populus balsamifera, var. candicans, A. Gray (Man. Ed. 2, 419, 1856). It has been generally conceded that the Populus Canaden- sis of Moench (Verz. Baume, No. 81), published in 1785, was applied to the variety of our Balm-of-Gilead, and is, therefore, an older name than Gray's candicans by seventy-one years. The P. balsamifera lanceolata, Marsh (1785), of the same date, and also referred to this variety as a synonym, doubtless had better be re- ferred to the type, the characters of which seems to fit Marshall's description with fewer allowances than are necessary in applying his name to the variety. The name for this variety should then become P. balsamifera, var. Canadensis (Moench)= P. Canadensis, Moench (I. c., 1785) =P. balsamifera, var. candicans, A. Gray (I.c., 1856). Thuya gigantea, Nuttall (Journ. Phil. Acad. vii. 52, 1834). The oldest name applied to this species is the 7. péicata of Donn. (Hort. Cantab. Ed. 6, 249, 1811); but this name was published without description, and must be considered a omen nudum. Lambert, however, established the name eleven years later, 1824 (Gen. Pinus, Rd. 1, ii. 19), and ten years before Nuttall applied 7. gigantea. T. plicata, of Lambert, (1824) should, therefore, replace T. gigantea, of Nuttall, (1834). Pinus Banksiana Lambert (Gen. Pinus Ed, 1, 7, t. 3, 1803): In the first edition of Aiton’s Hortus Kewensis (iii. 366, 1789) oc- curs this trinomial, “Pinus sylvestris, divaricata,’ founded on one of the principal characters of the Jack Pine, foliis divaricatis oblt- quis, Habitat ad Sinum Hudsonis. There is but one other pine in North-eastern North America, besides the Jack Pine, having two leaves in a sheath which could have been confused, i. e., the Red | Pine (Pinus resinosa); a species which Aiton carefully and fully describes on the next page of the same work. As acknowledged, moreover, by De Candolle and others, who cited the name as a synonym of Lambert’s P. Banksiana, there can be no question but that the Northern Jack Pine was the tree named. The name for this pine should then be Pinus divaricata (Aiton)= P. sylvestris, di- varicata (Aiton, l. c., 1789)=Pinus Banksianna, Lambert (1. cy 45 P. Cubensis, Grisebach (Mem. Am. Acad. viii, Pt. 2, 530, 1863). The first account of this Southern and West Indian pine is by Stephen Elliott, who considered it a variety of the common Lob- lolly Pine, calling it Pinus Tada, var. heterophylla, (Sketch Bot. 5S. C. and Ga. ii. 636, 1824). It was imperfectly known to Elliott, who observed it only in Georgia, its later-discovered geographical range not being known then, although he well recognized its dis- tinctness among the other mainland pines. His description lacks any mention of the cones, showing that he had not observed their very distinct appearance, yet his characterization of male flowers, leaves, bark, wood, and habitat, points unquestionably to the so- called Cuban Pine. Fortunately, the varietal name heterophylla is most fitting in its application to this pine, a marked feature of the species being that its leaves occur two and three in a sheath on the same branch. Since, therefore, the insular Pinus Cubensis and mainland forms are now known to be the same; there appears to be no good reason for not reinstating Elliott’s original varietal Name in specific rank. Dr. Engelmann did not hesitate to cite Elliott’s name as an equivalent of his own, later, P. E//ottit (Trans. St. Louis Acad. iv. 186, t. I, 2, 3, 1879), which in now to be con- sidered a synonym of Grisebach’s older P. Cudbensis. The name for the Cuban Pine would then become P. heterophylla (Ell.) =P. Teda var. heterophylla, ENiott (1. c., 1824) =P. Cubensis, Grisebach (l. c., 1863)= P. Cubensis, var. terthocarpa, Wright (in Griseb. Cat. Pl. Cub, 217 (1866)= P. Elfottii, Engelmann (I. c., 1879). Abies magnifica, Murray, (Proc. Royal Hort. Soc. Lond. iii. 318, ee ee 1863.) Murray seems to have published in 1860 another name for this species, A. campylocarpa, three years earlier than the now generally accepted A. magnifica. It is desirable if possible to reinstate the older A. campylocarpa, but the foundation upon which it rests appears to be insecure. The leaves described under A. campylocarpa might belong equally well to the closely related A. nobilis ; but the length of the cone noted excludes all other asso- Ciated species. The inference then to be drawn from the fact that no mention is made under A. campylocarpa of conspicuously ex- Serted bracts (common to A. nodilis) points circumstantially to A. — a magnifica as the only fir to which Murray could have applied his _ name. The Brlcertainty, however, seems too dere to warrant a 46 change of a well-known and established name, especially with re- spect to species not too well defined. Provisionally, therefore, A. campylocarpa may be retained as a synonym of the later, but better founded A. magnifica. Canella alba, Murray, (in Linn. Systema Veg. ed. 14, iv. 443, 1784.) Linneus’ Laurus Winterana (Spec. Pl. ed. 1, 371, 1753, exclu- sive “ Hab. in Carolina”) is the oldest name applied to this semi- tropical Florida and West Indian tree. Gaertner (Fruct. i. 377, t 77, 1788) took up Linnaeus’ specific name Winterana under Canella, but was not followed by subsequent authors. It is evident, how- ever, that Gaertner’s Canella Winterana should be maintained. Linnaeus’ Winterania Canella (Spec. Pl. ed. 2, 636, 1763) is also an older name than Murray’s C. aléa, which if taken up would give (Canella Canella) a combination, though that fortunately can | now be avoided. ForRESTRY DIVISION, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, WASHINGTON, D., C. On the American Black Cottonwood,* By P. A. RYDBERG. (PLaTEs CXL. anD CXLI.) “372. Fopuus 3p... +... ; Wiest approaching the Carter Canon, in Scott’s Bluff County, I saw, at a distance, some dark green trees with pyramidal crowns. Not knowing any other tree with dark foliage and pointed top growing in the region, I took them for unusually tall specimens of Juniperus Virginiana. Coming: a little nearer, I saw my mistake. It was a Populus, unlike all I have seen. As the buds were very balsamiferous and the leaves” cuneate at the base, I thought it was nothing but P. angustifolia, which I have never seen growing. When at home, I compared it with my specimens of this poplar, collected by Mr. T. A. Williams in the Hat Creek Basin in North-western Nebraska, and I saw at once the difference between the two. Although the leaves of my *Read before the Botanical Seminar of the University of Nebraska. 47 poplar are rhomboid-ovate, cuneate at the base, and not whitened beneath, I do believe that, if not distinct from both, it is a variety of P. balsamifera rather than of P. angustifolia. The leaves are rhomboid, on petioles 1-2 inches long (in P. angustifolia they are only ¥%-1 inch.), generally long-acuminate, shining on both sides, regularly crenate except at the cuneate base. The teeth are larger, more distant, and more regular than in P. angustifoha. Dr. Bessey states that the general appearance of the true P. angustifolia is more that of a willow than of a poplar, which is not at all the case with this. The general growth, the size, form, and color of the trunk were somewhat between those of P. dalsamifera and P. angulata, although most like the former. The long and slender petioles remind one of the latter or even of the Quaking Aspen. Dr. S. Watson says in his Revision about P. angustifolia : “Two forms are spoken of, the Yellow Cottonwood, making fair lumber, and the Black Cottonwood, common and extensively planted in Utah, but the wood is considered worthless.” May be, this is the former. I saw it growing only at one place, viz., in Carter Canon, where it grew along the brook, together with P. angulata. The grove contained Over 109 trees of this poplar, 40 to 60 feet high, some measuring 18 inches in diameter. Carter Canon, S. B. Co., Juiy 26.” The above is an abstract from my list of plants, collected in Western Nebraska, in the summer 1891, for the U. S. Department of Agriculture. John M. Holzinger, Assistant Botanist of the Same department, who afterwards examined my collection, wrote me, among other things concerning this tree: “I make it, after care- ful consideration, Populus angustifolia, James. The difficulty seems to arise from the mature leaves: herb. material generally has them undeveloped.” I still believe, however, the above to be dis- tinct from P. angustifolia, James, or, at least, from what we have been used to call so. I saw both, this summer:—my No. 372 both with undeveloped and mature leaves, and the true P. angustifolia, on the 28th of June, at which time the leaves, although not mature, yet had received their form. Specimens with mature leaves are found in the herbarium of the University of Nebraska. J udging from the material on hand, I do not hesitate to declare them to be distinct species. Perhaps, if I had a fuller series of Specimens, I would be of another opinion. Taking for granted 48 that they are two distinct species, or, at least, two varieties, let us see which has the right to the name of Populus angustifolia, James. The original description by James I have not seen, but I must suppose that both Dr. Watson and Nuttall knew James’ tree, and have described the same. Dr. Watson writes in his Revision of the North American Cottonwoods: « P. angustifolia, James. Leaves not white beneath, rhombic- ovate to narrowly lanceolate, mostly cuneate at the base, often small, petioles one-half inch long or less (rarely one inch), etc.” In King’s Report, the description of Populus balsamifera, var. angustifolia, contains among other characters: « . , . leaves ovate-lanceolate, attenuate at the base, acute, glabrous, crenate-serrate. Leaves varying much between the ordi- nary growth (2’-3’ long by 8’—-12” wide, acute and often sub- rhomboidal) and that of younger shoots where they may be 6’—8’ long and 3’ or more broad, and often cordate at base, always with long acumination.” Nuttall, in Silva Americana, gives about the same description, and adds: “The footstalks of the leaves or petioles are about three-fourths toaninchin length. The nerves are all faint beneath and pinnate, with no appearance of being 3-nerved at the base; the number of these nerves or lateral vessels is twelve to fifteen on a side, at least double the number they are in the Balsam Poplar.” These descriptions can only apply to the form we are used to call P. angustifolia, James. All specimens thereof found at present in the Herbarium of the University of Nebraska, agree in that the petioles are short, from ¥ to I inch long, and the lateral nerves are, at least in the larger leaves, about 10-15 on each side. (See Plate CXL.). In the specimens of my No. 372, from Carter Canon, and of the same tree collected, this year, at Hot Springs, S. D., the petioles are from 1-2 inches or even more, and the lateral nerves seldom more than 8. . As it is remarked by Dr. Watson, the leaves of the Black Cottonwood vary considerably, especially on young shoots. All specimens I have used for comparison are taken, however, from trees over 20 feet high. The first leaves from the bud are generally more or less ovate, I-2% inches long. These are followed by - 49 lanceolate leaves, 2-5 inches. All the leaves are gradually acum- inate towards the apex, and finely crenate-serrate from base to tip. Inthe specimens collected by Dr. Bessey, at Manitou, Col., July 18, 1886, the first leaves are very broad, with rounded or even cordate base. In my own specimens from Little Elk Canon, S. D., June 28, 1892, the leaves are small and nearly all lanceolate. The leaves of my No. 372 differ, besides in the length of the petiole, in being rhomboidal, always having cuneate base and an abrupt acumination. The teeth are scarcely any from the base to near the broadest part of the leaf, from there they are more regular and larger than in P. angustifolia, till they disappear again at the acumination. The specimens from Carter Canon have the leaves twice as long as broad, and with long acumination. In those from Hot Springs the leaves are broader (the breadth equalling 24 or 34 of the length) with a shorter acumination. The latter are in form like the leaves of P. Hudsonica, Michx. f., figured in Silva Americana, but the shoots and petioles are not hairy. They also resemble those of the Black Cottonwood of Europe, P. nigra (P. Hudsonica, according to Gray), which, however, if I am not mistaken, has angled petioles. It seems to approach the true cottonwoods in several respects.* I have mentioned above the form of the leaves and the length of the pe- tioles. The old bark resembles somewhat that of P. monilifera, but is whiter. The crown, although pyramidal in form, is more exten- Sive than in P. angustifolia, the branches being more spreading and the leaves semi-pendent. Thetrees of P. angustifola that I have seen were all narrowly pyramidal with ascending branches, giving them the aspect of a willow, a fact, as is stated before, which then has been noticed by Dr. Bessey. What, is this cottonwood? Four alternatives present them- Selves to me: a species distinct from P. angustzfolia, a local variety, a mere form of the same, or a hybrid. As I have stated before, Iam most inclined to believe the first. A local variety, produced by the climate, it cannot very well be, as the two are growing in *In D.C. Prod., the American Black Cottonwood is referred to the Common Cottonwood, under the name Populus Canadensis, var. angustifolia, Wesmael. To place our 2 angustifolia as a variety of P. Canadensis (P. monilifera) was, indeed, : a blunder. If Wesmael had seen my No. 372, instead of the true 2 angustifolia, —— the mistake would be, perhaps, more excusable. ae es Pa me eee 50 the same habitat, viz.: in canons, near water, at the-same altitude, and in the same region. A mere form, or individual variation of the Black Cottonwood, it cannot be. Of the more than 100 trees growing in Carter Canon, I did not see a single one that had lanceo- late leaves with short petioles, nor a narrow crown; and at Little Elk, where I saw about as many trees of the true P. angustifolia, I did not notice a single one that had the long petioles and abrupt acumination characteristic of my No. 372. At Hot Springs, I saw only three Black Cottonwoods, and all three agreed with those from Carter Canon, except that the leaves were broader. Dr. Chas. E. Bessey and Prof. T. A. Williams, of South Dakota Agricultural College, who have both seen the Black Cottonwood several times have not seen a form like this. The fact that my No. 372, in both places was growing together with P. monilifera, might suggest the possibility of its being a hybrid of that and P. angustifo- “a; but the total absence of the latter tends’to show the contrary. Believing that there are two American Black Cottonwoods, I shall try to give the distinguishing characters: Populus angustifolia, James.—Leaves lanceolate or ovate, grad- ually acuminate, with cuneate, rounded, or heart-shaped base, on short petioles (1% inch long), thickish, drying yellowish or brown- ish, finely crenate-serrate from base to apex; lateral nerves in the larger leaves often 10-15; crown narrowly pyramidal with ascend- ing branches. Collected by Dr. Chas. E. Bessey, at Manitou, Col., July 18, 1886, etc.; by T. A. Williams, in War Bonnet Canon, June, 1890, etc.; by myself, in Little Elk Canon. (Plate CXL.) Populus acuminata, n. sp. (No. 372 of my Nebraska Collec- tion). Leaves more or less rhomboidal, abruptly acuminate, with cuneate base and long petioles (1’—2’ long, or more), semi-pendent, thinner than in the preceding, drying green; denticulation scarcely any at the base and near the top; at the middle, regular and larger than in the preceding; lateral nerves seldom more than 8 on each side; crown broadly pyramidal with spreading branches. Collected by me in Carter Canon, Scott’s Bluff Co., Neb., July 25, 1891, and at Hot Springs, S. D. (Plate CXLI.) LuTHER ACADEMY, WAHOO, Ngs., Oct. 15, 1892. X [ Mr. Rydberg’s description of P. angustifolia and his figure (Plate CNL.) agree accurately with James’ type specimen, preserved in Herb, Torrey. N. L. B.] A Century of American Weed Seeds. By Byron D, HALSTED. A collection of one hundred kinds of weed seeds, brought to- gether in the shape shown in the accompanying engraving, is a new thing in American Economic Botany. The seeds are placed in dram metal screw-cap vials, arranged in a shallow tray about the length and breadth of a standard herbarium sheet, as illustrated in the cut. Each bottle bears a number and the botanical and one or more common names of the Species of the seed contained therein, as for example: “No. 34. Anthemis Cotula,L. Mayweed, Dog-fennel.” Upon the underside of the cover to the tray is pasted a full list of the species with numbers to correspond with those upon the vials. After the common names the letter A indicates that the Species is annual; B, biennial; and P, perennial. Thirty-eight (38) are native species and sixty-two (62) are from abroad, thus show- ing a large majority of foreign origin. The annuals lead with forty-eight (48) species; perennials next with thirty-five (35); biennials, fifteen (15); and two (2) live either one or two years. 52 The following is the list of species : RANuUNCULACEA —Crowfoot Family. 1. Ranunculus bulbosus, L. Buttercup. P.t+ CruciFeR &—Mustard Family. . Barbarea vulgaris, R. Br. Yellow Rocket. B. . Brassica nigra, (L.) Koch. Black Mustard. A. . Brassica Sinapistrum, Boiss. Charlock. A. Bursa pastoris, (L.) Weber, Shepherd’s Purse. A. ; Lepidium campestre, (L.) R. Br. Field Pepper-grass. es . Lepidium Virginicum, L. Pepper-grass. A, . Raphanus Raphanistrum, L. Wild Radish. A. . Sisymbrium officinale (L.) Scop. Hedge Mustard. A. OMY AMN HW DN CARYOPHYLLACE&—Pink Family. 10. Agrostemma Githago,L. Corn Cockle. A. 11. Saponaria officinalis, L. Bouncing Bet: ¥. 3 PoRTULACACE& —Purslane Family. 12. Portulaca oleracea, L. Purslane. A. MALVACE&—Mallow Family. 13. Adutilon Avicenna, Geertn. Velvet-leaf. A. 14. Hibiscus Trionum, L. Bladder Ketmia. A. 15. Malva rotundifolia, L.. Mallow. P. GERANIACE2—Geranium Family. 16. Erodium cicutarium, L’Her. Storksbill. A. LEGUMINOS&—Pea Family. 17. Cassia Chamecrista,L. Partridge Pea. A. 18. Crotalaria sagittalis, L. Rattle-box. A. 19. Medicago lupulina,, Nonesuch. B. 20. Melilotus alba, Lam. White Melilot. A-B. 21. Melilotus officinalis (L.) Lam. Sweet Clover. A-B. RosacE&—Rose Family. 22, Agrimonia Eupatoria, L. Agrimony. P. ONAGRACE&—Evening Primrose Family. 23. Enothera biennis, L. Evening Primrose. B. PASsIFLORACEA:—Passion-flower Family. 24. Passiflora incarnata,L. May-pops. P. Fico1ipEa&—Carpet-weed Family. 25. Mollugo verticillata,L. Carpet-weed. A. UMBELLIFER&—Parsnip Family. 26. Daucus Carota,L. Wild Carrot. B.. 2. Pastinaca sativa, L. Wild Parsnip. B. 53 RuBiAcE£—Madder Family. 28. Diodia teres, Walt.. Buttonweed. A. DiesAcEa—Teasel Family. 29. Dipsacus sylvestris, Huds. Teasel. B. Composit 4—Sunflower Family. 30. Achillea Millefolium, L. Yarrow. P. 31. Ambrosia artemisiefolia, L. Ragweed. A. 32. Ambrosia trifida, L. Great Ragweed. A. 33. Anthemis arvensis, L. Chamomile. A. 34. Anthemis Cotula, L. Mayweed. A. 35- Arctium Lappa, L. Burdock. P. 36. Bidens bipinnata, .. Spanish needles, A. 37. Bidens frondosa, L. Beggars-ticks. A. 38. Chrysanthemun Leucanthemum, L. Daisy. P. 39. Cichorium Intybus, L. Chicory, P. 40. Carduus arvensis, L. Canada Thistle. P. 41. Erechthites hieracifolia (L.) Raf. Fireweed. A. 42. Erigeron annuus (L.) Pers. Fleabane. A. 43. Erigeron Canadensis, L. Horse-weed. B. 44. Erigeron ramosus (Walt.) B.S. P. Rough Fleabane. B. 45. Hieracium aurantiacum, L. Golden Uawkweed. P. 46. Lactuca Canadensis, L. Wild Lettuce. B. 47. Lactuca Scariola,L. Prickly Lettuce. B. 48. Rudbeckia hirta,L. Cone-flower. P. _ 49. Solidago lanceolata, L. Narrow Golden-rod. P. 50. Solidago rigida, L. Stiff Golden-rod. P. 51. Sonchus oleraceus, L. Sow Thistle. A. 52. Taraxacum officinale, Web. Dandelion. P. 53- Vernonia Noveboracensis (L.) Willd. Iron-weed. P. 54. Xanthium Canadense, Mill. Cocklebur. A. 55- Xanthium spinosum, L. Spiny Clotbur. A. APOCYNACE&—Dogbane Family. 56. Apocynum cannabinum,L, Dogbane. P. ASCLEPIADACEA:—Milkweed Family- 57. Asclepias Syriaca, L. Milkweed. P. BoRRAGINACE—Borage Family. 58. Cynoglossum officinale, L. WHound’s-tongue. B. 59. Echinospermum Lappula (L.) Lehm. Stick-seed. B. 60. Echium vulgare, L. Blue-weed. B. CoNVOLVULACE&—Morning-glory Family. 61. Convolvulus arvensis,L. Bindweed. P. 62. [pomea hederacea, Jacq. Morning-glory. A. SoLANACEA:—Night-shade Family. 63. Datura Stramonium, L. Thornapple. A. 64. Datura Tatula,. Purple Thornapple. A. 65. Physalis Virginiana, Mill. Ground-cherry. Pe 66. Solanum Dulcamara, L. Biterswet - Po 54 SCROPHULARIACEZ —Figwort Family. 67. Linaria vulgaris, Mill. Toad-flax. P. 68. Verbascum Blattaria, L. Moth Mullein. B. 69. Verbascum Thapsus,L. Mullein. B. OROBANCHACE2—Broom-rape Family. 70. Orobanche ramosa, L. Broom-rape. A. BIGNONIACE&—Bignonia Family. 71, Tecoma radicans (L.) Juss. Trumpet-flower. P. 72. Verbena hastata,L. Blue Vervain. P. 73. Verbena urticefolia, L. Vervain. P. LaBiAT2—Mint Family. 74. Brunella vulgaris, L. Heal-all. P. 75. Leonurus Cardiaca, L. Motherwort. P. 76. Nepeta Cataria, L. Catnip. P. PLANTAGINACE#—Plantain Family. 77. Plantago lanceolata, L. Rib-grass. P. 78. Plantago major, L. Common Plantain. P. 79. Plantago Rugelii, Dec. Native Plantain. P. AMARANTACE2—Pigweed Family. 80. Amarantus albus, L. Tumble-weed. A. 81. Amarantus chlorostachys, Willd. Amaranth, A. 82. Amarantus paniculatus, L. Branched Pigweed. A. 83. Amarantus retroflexus, L. Pigweed. A. CHENOPODIACEZ—Goosefoot Family. 84. Chenopodium album, L, Goosefoot. A. PHYTOLACCACEA—Pokewecd Family. 85. Phytolacca decandra, L.. Pokeroot. Scoke. A. POLYGONACE2—Smartweed Family. 86. Polygonum Convolvulus,L. Black Bindweed. A. 87. Polygonum Pennsylvanicum, L. Smartweed. A. 88. Rumex Acetosella, L. Sorrel. P. 89. Rumex crispus, L. Curled Dock. P. 90. Rumex obtusifolius,L. Bitter Dock, P. EvupHoRBIACEa:—Spurge Family. 91. Euphorbia maculata, L. Spotted Spurge. A. 92. Euphorbia Freslii,Guss. Spurge. A. GRAMINE&—Grass Family. 93. Agropyrum repens (L.) Beauv. Quack-grass. P. 94. Bromus secalinus L. Chess. A. 95. Cenchrus tribuloides, L. Bur-grass. A. 96. Panicum capillare, L. Witch grass. A. 97. Panicum Crus-galli,L. Barnyard-grass. A. 98. Panicum sanguinale,L, Crab-grass. A. © 99. Chameraphis glauca (L.) Kuntze. Fox-tail. A. : 100, Chameraphis viridis (L.) Kuntze. Green Fox-tail. A. | 5d The hundred species are distributed among thirty-one families. Twenty-six (26), or more than a quarter, belong to the large weedy order Composite. Other well-represented orders are the mustards and the grasses, each having eight species. It is a well-known fact that weeds are often introduced into new localities in field, and even garden seeds ; sometimes as many as forty kinds of weed seeds have been identified in a sample of clover seed, and grass seed is frequently no less free from foul stuff. Therefore sets of these seeds, as shown in the engraving, have been prepared to aid s¢ationists (pardon the coining of a new word for station-agriculturists, station-horticulturists, station- botanists and other station workers taken collectively) and seedsmen in determining the exact nature of much of the impurity found in commercial seeds. COLLEGE EXPERIMENT STATION, NEW BRuNSWICK, N. J., Dec. 29, 1892. Preliminary Report on the Flora of Luzerne County, Penn. By A. A. HELLER. We are more or less prone to consider the long-settled portions of our country old and undesirable ground, when botanical explor- ation is thought of. Mexico, the far West, or some other distant point, claims our attention, and we forget that all around us is an abundance of territory that has never been touched by a botanical collector. I have just begun to realize that the State of Pennsylvania is a great botanical wilderness. Many of the counties have never been explored, or only partially. Most of the work that has been done is due to the untiring energy of Prof. Thos. C. Porter. Our own county of Lancaster, which can boast of almost fifteen hundred Species, an account of which has been published by Dr. Porter, © has a great tract of limestone and new ted sandstone, comprising more than half of the county, that is sadly in need of attention. To me, one of the most interesting of these ‘ wild’’ counties is Luzerne, situated somewhat northeast of the centre of the State. To the Torrey Club it is especially interesting, as it falls within the limits of the Preliminary Catalogue, the one hundred mile — ie - cutting through the eastern eae of ame peers es 56 During the summer. of 1888 my attention was first called to its interesting flora, while staying at Berwick, Columbia county. The northern part of Berwick touches the southern boundary of Lu- zerne county. The county is cut almost in half by the Susque- hanna river, and contains seven marked geological formations. Within three of these, Chemung, Hamilton and Catskill forma- tion, and in territory chiefly within the limit of glacial action, it has been my privilege to collect, though to a very limited extent. The terminal moraine, as I have since ascertained, makes its appearance at Wapwallopen, about seven miles above Nescopeck, runs in a southwesterly direction across the river, which it follows nearly to Berwick, and thence passes into Columbia county. On the high bluff on the right bank of the river, and almost on the southern boundary line, is a quantity of Zissa rubra, and along the steeply-sloping sides, numerous patches of Sedum acre. Fol- lowing north, along the tracks of the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad, which runs parallel to the river and canal, many of our common plants are to be found. Here Solidago juncea blooms earlier than at any other place where I have seen it, mak- ing its appearance in July. Asclepias obtusifolia is not common, only two or three plants being observed, while a rare find in the shape of three plants of Spirea rubra, the only ones that I have ever seen growing wild, peeped out from the rank growth of grass and bushes. Afios tuberosa twined over the bushes, near neighbor to Phlox maculata and Lathyrus palustris. Down along the low margin of the canal a tangled mass of Myosotis laxa was guarded by the large and showy blue flag, /vs versicolor. In a little swampy place along the river, Veronica scutellata flourished, and in drier and more open places, Ranunculus acris and Gtnothera pumila. Growing in the sand on the river brink, was a little patch of Ranunculus reptans, which is completely submerged except at times of low water. In March, 1892, I spent two days at Berwick, and, while taking a walk along the railroad, observed a number of small pine trees growing on the side of the bank. They were full of cones, and close inspection satisfied me that they are Pinus echinata, although I do not have specimens to substantiate the determination. If it is really this pine, its appearance so far North is remarkable, at - least at such a distance from the coast. | 5T Crossing the river to Nescopeck, and following up the left bank for about the same distance as on the right bank, namely, about a mile and a half, quite a different flora is observed. One of the first things noticed was a stalk or two of Cacalia suaveolens, and further on an occasional plant of Physostegia Virginiana and Hypericum ellipticum. Overhanging the river bank in deep, shady places, were clumps of Rhododendron maximum, the recollection of which leaves a bright spot in one’s memory, for few things are prettier than the-sea of glossy green leaves, intermingled with the glorious flower clusters of Rhododendron. 1 do not attach a specific name, as it is not an easy matter to decide which Rhododendron is the most handsome, for when I first saw the gorgeous purple masses of R. Catawdiense at Blowing Rock and on Grandfather Mountain, North Carolina, they seemed more beautiful than any other, until the delicate white and pink of R. maximum appeared almost at our very doors. Two rare finds were Séellaria uliginosa and Pyrola chlorantha, each represented very sparingly. Following Black Creek for a short distance beyond Nescopeck, only a few things of interest were found, among which were Mon- arda fistulosa, var. rubra, Veronica Virginica and two forms of Spirea salicifolia, one with broad leaves, and the other with nar- row ones. One day I heard of a little body of water, which was said to be a famous place for water lilies, and rightly concluded that other plants might be found there. Locally it is known as the “ Pond,” and « Lily Lake,” and officially on the map as Long Pond. It is situated some ten or twelve miles northeast of Ber- wick, and about three miles from the river. It was visited first on July 5, 1888, then on June 24th and July 29, 1889, by myself, and on August 15th and 16th, 1889, by Mr. Small and myself, and by us again on September 20, 1890. Then came an interval of two years, until September 16th and 17th, 1892, when Miss E. Gertrude Halbach and myself made the so far final trip, and of it I intend especially to speak. On the morning of September 16th we crossed from Berwick to Nescopeck, taking the train to Pond Hill, a station nine miles farther north. Just opposite the station, and only a few feet from , it, at the base of the hill which skirts the river, is an outcropping of rocks full of imprints of crinoids and other fossils. — Upon the fig 58 rocks were found Woodsia [lvensis and a few plants each of Camp- tosorus rhizophyllus, Asplenium Trichomanes, and Arabis lyrata. Here Nature had been lavish with her paint-brush. Under the trees of Cornus florida, whose bright-colored leaves lit up the wooded hillside, was an abundance of Solidago bicolar, S. cesia, and Lupatorium ageratoides. The fence rows were purple with Aster Nove-Anghe. About three hundred yards from the station the road turns to the right, through the woods, and up to the top of the hill. Along this road the polymorphous Solidago nemoralis was very plentiful, as was S. /anceolata and S. latifolia. S. squar- rosa was found only occasionally. It is to be regretted that we did not take an old road below ‘ie present one, for along it in 1889 I found several specimens of So/?- dago rupestris, a very rare find for Northeastern Pennsylvania. This old road was reserved for the return trip, but at that period time, which is no respecter of botanists, was urging us on at a lively gait in order to catch the train. There was just one cause for regret, and that was when we came to the station for the rare Aster concinnus, discovered by Mr. Small and myself in 1890. The farmer along whose fence they grew had an idea that «‘ weeds” do not improve the appearance of fence-rows, and had cut them down. Owing to this only two poor specimens were obtained. The lake, a beautiful little sheet of water about two miles long and a mile wide, is evidently a relic of the glacial period. Accord- ing to the aneroid barometer, it is 880.feet above sea level, and 480 feet above the river. On the north it is skirted by a low mountain ridge, on the west by gently-sloping ground, with indi- cations that there was once an outlet on that side, and on the other sides by low and often swampy ground. It is a veritable botanical Paradise. The chocolate-colored water is full of little peat islands, literally swarming with vegetation, while the shores are lined with shrubs, and the woods full of interesting plants. A boat was pro- cured, and a voyage of discovery begun. Among the first things observed were the tiny yellow flowers of Uvricularia gibba rising from a very ugly-looking mixture of peat and mud. Masses of _ roots of Castalia odorata were floating about, nuclei for the growth of future vegetation. A very tempting-looking bush of J/ex vertt- cillata, var. padifolia caused us to land and investigate the shore. a 59 A good supply of several forms of //ex was gathered, in addition to Spirea salictfolia, S. tomentosa, Cassandra calyculata, Polygonum emersum, and Vaccinium corymbosum, var. amenum. Vaccinium disomorphum, so plentiful two years before, the taste of whose fruit seems still to linger, was not observed. At that time the fruit was so plentiful that its weight bent the bushes almost to the water's edge. Pushing off again, we were soon among colonies of Xyris Caro- “iniana, Eviocaulon septangulare, Oxycoccus macrocarpus, Eleocharis olivacea, found nowhere else in Pennsylvania, and Juncus pelocarpus found at one other station in the State. Winding in and out among the bushes of Cephalanthus occidentalis and clumps of Nesea verti- cillata, which form a sort of breakwater, we hove in sight of ‘‘ Stumptown,” as it was promptly christened, near the upper end of the lake. It seems at one time to have been dry, or as near dry land as is possible there, for stumps are very plentiful, and so are lilies, their pretty white and golden cups resting lightly upon the surface of the water. Sarracenia purpurea was searched for, but in vain, although it is found there earlier in the season. An almost submerged log near the shore is headquarters for Drosera rotundifolia and D. intermedia, var. Americana, the two sometimes growing matted together. Another landing was made, and fine Specimens of Aster corymbosus, A. linariifolius, A. undulatus and _other plants were collected. A hasty investigation of the opposite or north shore yielded Polygonum hydropiperoides and Potamogeton Nuttallii, The lengthening shadows warned us that it was time to suspend operations, and further investigation was aban- doned until next day. Early the following morning we were out on the lake, getting @ good supply of things that had merely been sampled the day before, and looking out for new treasures. Cicuta bulbifera, Bah- meria cylindrica, a form of Bidens cernua which I have seen no- where else, and Coreopsis discoidea, held sway over a patch of peat. Aster undulatus, with larger flowers than usual, and thin, broad leaves, several forms of A. cordifolius, A. lateriflorus, var. hirsutt-— caulis, a small flowered form of Solidago arguta, and a form of the €xceedingly variable //ex verticillata were collected. In the hasty Search over a field, only one plant of Guaphalium decurrens was found, but on the edge of the woods were good fruiting specimens oe 60 of Quercus Muhlenbergii, var. humilis, and Betula lenta. A good- sized tree of Pyrus nigra was looked for, but absence of fruit and the lateness of the hour prevented us from making a thorough search. This tree, observed in 1890, is twenty or twenty-five feet high, and worthy of being included in Prof. Sargent’s Silva. A hurried tramp through the woods added Pyrola secunda, P. elliptica, and what is probably P. udiginosa, and fine specimens of Asplenium platyneuron. Altogether, 156 species were observed, with 82 on the list of actual collection. Many more might have been added, but lack of time prevented. As far as I have been able to learn, no other persons have botanized in this portion of the county, or, indeed, in any other part, unless in the extreme northeastern end about Pittston. Thorough exploration of other portions will un- doubtedly yield a rich and interesting flora. On the right bank of the river, scattered about in the Catskill formation, are six or eight small lakes, and one larger one called Harvey’s Lake. Some five or six miles east of Long Pond are two lakes, known locally as Mud | Pond and Three-Cornered Pond, and about ten miles east of these, not far from the Lehigh Valley Railroad, is a nameless lake, the lar- gest in the county. Just east of this lake is an elevated section of Pocono sandstone, which must have a flora very similar to that of the Pocono, as it is merely a western extension of that interesting region. The total number of species collected in the county thus far is 325, about one-fifth of the number that ought to be found. LIST OF SPECIES COLLECTED. Clematis Virginiana, L. Above Berwick. Anemone Virginiana, L. Above Berwick. Hepatica triloba, Chaix. Pond Hill. Ranunculus acris, L.. Above Berwick. Ranunculus reptans, L. Above Berwick. Lsopyrum trifolium (L.) Britton. Long Pond. Actea alga (L.) Mill. Long Pond. Cimictfuga racemosa (L.) Nutt. Pond Hill. Liriodendron Tulipifera, L. Pond Hill. BRASENIA PURPUREA (Michx.) Long Pond. Hydropeltis purpurea, Michx. FI. Bor. Amer. 324, t. 29 (1803). Brasenia peltata, Pursh, Fl. Amer., Sept. 389 (1814). Nymphea advena, Soland. Long Pond. 61 Castalia odorata (Dryand) Woody. & Wood. Long Pond. Sarracenia purpurea, L. Long Pond. NECKERIA SEMPERVIRENS (L.) Long Pond. Fumaria sempervirens, L. Sp. Pl. 700 (1753). Corydalis glauca, Pursh, Fl. Amer. Sept. 463 (1814). Nasturtium hispidum (Desv.) DC. Above Berwick. Arabis Canadensis, L. Long Pond. Arabis lyrata,L. Pond Hill. Lepidium Virginicum, L. Long Pond. Lechea Leggettii, Britton & Hollick. Pond Hill. Viola palmata, L.. Pond Hill. Polygala verticillata, L. Long Pond. Silene stellata (L.) Ait. Nescopeck. Cerastium vulgatum, L, Above Berwick. Stellaria uliginosa, Murr. Above Nescopeck. Tissa rubra (L.) Britton. Above Berwick. fypericum Ascyron, L. Above Berwick. fy pericum ellipticum, Hook. Above Nescopeck. flypericum maculatum, Walt. Above Berwick. flypericum mutilum, L. Long Pond. fypericum per foratum, L. Above Berwick. flypericum Virginicum, L. Long Pond. Tilia Americana, L. Above Berwick. Geranium maculatum, L. Long Pond. Oxalis stricta, L. Pond Hill. Impatiens aurea, Mubl. Pond Hill. llex verticillata (L.) A. Gray. Long Pond. lex verticillata, var. padifolia (Willd.) T. & G. Long Pond. Nemopanthes mucronata (L.) Trelease. Long Pond. Ceanothus Americanus, L. Pond Hill. Vitis cordifolia, Michx. Above Berwick. Acer saccharinum, L. Long Pond. Rhus glabra, L. Above Berwick. Rhus radicans, L. Pond Hill. Rhus typhina, L. Above Berwick. Melilotus alba, Lam. Above Berwick. Trifolium arvense, L. Long Pond. Meibomia Canadensis (L.) Kuntze. Above Berwick. Lespedeza hirta (L.) Ell. Pond Hill. Lathyrus palustris, L. Above Berwick. Amphicarpea comosa (L.) Ridd. Above Berwick. Apios tuberosa, Mcench. Above Berwick. Cassia nictitans, L. Above Berwick. Prunus Americana, Marsh. Above Berwick. Spirea rubra (Mill.) Britton, Above Berwick. Spirea salicifolia, L. Nescopeck, Long Pond. | Spirea tomentosa, L. Long Pond. 62 Rubus Canadensis, L. Long Pond. Rubus hispidus,L. Long Pond. Rubus villosus, Ait. Above Berwick. Rubus villosus, var. montanus, Porter. Long Pond. Geum Canadense, Jacq. Above Berwick. Potentilla Canadensis, L. Pond Hill. Rosa Carolina, L. Long Pond. Rosa humilis, Marsh. Above Berwick. Pyrus nigra (Marsh.) Sargent. Long Pond. Hydrangea arborescens, L. Above Nescopeck. Sedum acre, L. Above Berwick. Drosera intermedia, Drev. & Hayne., var. Americana, D. C. Long Pond. Drosera rotundifolia, L. Long Pond. Proserpinaca palustris, L. Long Pond. Nesea verticillata (L.) H.B.K. Long Pond. LE pilobium coloratum, Muhl. Above Berwick. LE pilobium spicatum, Lam. Nescopeck. nothera fruticosa, L. Long Pond. @nothera biennis, L. Pond Hill. (Enothera pumila, L. Above Berwick. Hydrocotyle Americana, L. Above Berwick. Cicuta bulbifera, L. Long Pond. Sium cicutefolium,Gmel. Long Pond. Angelica villosa (Walt.) B.S.P. Pond Hill. _ Aralia racemosa, L. Long Pond. Cornus alternifolia, L. Pond Hill. Cornus circinata, L’Hér. Pond Hill. Cornus florida, L. Long Pond. Sambucus Canadensis, L. Above Nescopeck. Sambucus pubens, Michx. Above Berwick. Viburnum acerifolium, L. Pond Hill. Viburnum dentatum, L. Long Pond. Cephalanthus occidentalis, 1. Long Pond. Mitchella repens, L. Long Pond. Galium asprellum, Michx. Above Berwick. — Galium circezans, Michx. Long Pond, Galium lanceolatum, Torr. Above Nescopeck. Galium triflorum, Michx. Long Pond. Eupatorium ageratoides, L. f. Pond Hill. Eupatorium purpureum, L. Pond Hill. Solidago arguta, Ait. Long Pond. Solidago bicolor, L. Pond Hill. Solidago cesta, L. Pond Hill. Solidago Canadensis, L. Pond Hill. Solidago juncea, Ait. Pond Hill. Solidago lanceolata, L. Pond Hill. Solidago latifolia, L. Pond Hill, 63 Solidago nemoratis, Ait. Pond Hill. Solidago rugosa, Mill. Pond Hill. Solidago rupestris, Raf. Pond Hill. Solidago serotina, Ait. Above Berwick. Solidago sguarrosa, Muhl. Pond Hill. Aster acuminatus, Michx. Lond Pond. Aster concinnus, Willd. Long Pond. Aster cordifolius, L. Pond Hill. Aster cordifolius, L., var. danceolatus, Porter. Long Pond. Aster corymbosus, Ait. Long Pond. Aster ericoides, 1. Pond Hill, Aster infirmus, Michx. Pond Hill. Aster laterifiorus (L.) Britton, var. Azrsuticawlis (Lindl.), Millsp. Long Pond. Aster linariifolius, L. Long Pond. Aster Nove-Anglia, L. Pond Hill. Aster paniculatus, Lam. Pond Hill. Aster patens, Ait. Long Pond. Aster patens, var. phlogifolius (Muhl.) Nees. Long Pond. Aster prenanthoides, Muh]. Pond Hill. Aster undulatus, L. Long Pond. LErigeron Canadensis, L. Long Pond. Anaphalis margaritacea (L.) Benth. & Hook. Long Pond. Gnaphalium decurrens, Ives. Long Pond. Gnaphalium obtusifolium, L. Long Pond. Guaphalium purpureum, L. Long Pond. Guaphalium uliginosum, L. Long Pond. Polymnia Canadensis, L. Pond Hill. Coreopsis discoidea, T. & G. Long Pond. Bidens frondosa, L. Pond Hill. Bidens cernua,L. Long Pond. Achillea Millefolium, L. Long Pond. Chrysanthemum Leucanthemum, L. Long Pond. Artemisia Pontica, L.? Long Pond. Erechtites hieracifolia (L.) Raf. Long Pond. Cacalia atriplicifolia, L. Pond Hill. Cacalia suaveolens, L. Nescopeck. Carduus lanceolatus, L. Long Pond. Hieracium venosum,L. Long Pond. Lactuca Canadensis, L. Above Berwick. Prenanthes altissima, L. Long Pond. Prenanthes Serpentaria, Pursh. Long Pond. Lobelia cardinalis, L. Long Pond. Lobelia inflata, L. Long Pond. Lobelia spicata, Lam. Above Berwick. Lobelia syphilitica, L. Pond Hill. Campanula aparinoides, Pursh, Above Nescopeck. ee rotundifolia, oa Above Saree 64 Gaylussacia frondosa (L.) T. & G. Long Pond. Vaccinium corymbosum, L., var.amenum (Ait.) A Gray. Long Pond. Vaccinium disomorphum, Bigel. Long Pond. Vaccinium stamineum,L. Long Pond, Vaccinium vacillans, Soland. Long Pond. Oxycoccus macrocarpus, Pers. Long Pond. Gaultheria procumbens, L. Long Pond. Epigea repens,L. Long Pond. Kalmia angustifolia, L. Long Pond. Kalmia latifolia, L. Pond Hill. Azalea nudifiora, L. Long Pond. Rhododendron maximum, L. Above Nescopeck. Pyrola chlorantha, Sw. Above Nescopeck. Pyrola elliptica, Nutt. Long Pond. Pyrola rotundifolia, L. Long Pond. Pyrola secunda, L. Long Pond, Pyrola uliginosa, Torr.? Long Pond. Chimaphila umbellata (L.) Nutt. Pond Hill. Hy popitys Monotropa, Crantz. Long Pond. _ Lysimachia quadrifolia, L. Above Nescopeck. Lysimachia terrestris (L.) B.S.P. Above Berwick. Steironema ciliatum (L.) Raf. Above Berwick. Asclepias exaltata (L.) Muhl. Pond Hill. Asclepias obtusifolia, Michx. Above Berwick. Sabbatia angularis (L.) Pursh. Above Berwick. Gentiana quinguefolia, L. Pond Hill. Bartonia Virginica (L.) B.S.P. Long Pond, Phlox maculata, L. Above Berwick. Phlox paniculata, L, Long Pond. Phlox subulata, L. Long Pond. Myosotis laxa, Lehm. Above Berwick, Cuscuta Gronovii, Willd. Above Berwick. Physalis Virginiana, Mill. Above Berwick. Scrophularia nodosa, L., var. Marylandica (L.) A. Gray. Pond Hill. Chelone glabra, L. Above Berwick. Mimulus ringens, L. Above Berwick. Gratiola Virginiana,L. Above Berwick. Ilysanthes gratioloides (L.) Benth. Above Berwick. Veronica Americana, L. Above Berwick. Veronica officinalis, L. Long Pond. Veronica scutellata,L. Above Berwick. Veronica Virginica, L. Nescopeck. Gerardia pedicularia, L. Pond Hill. Gerardia tenuifolia, Vahl. Long Pond. Melampyrum lineare, Lam. Above Nescopeck. Utricularia gibba, L. Long Pond. Utricularia vulgaris, L. Long Pond. 65 Dianthera Americana, L. Above Berwick. Verbena hastata, L. Pond Hill. Verbena urticefolia, L. Pond Hill. Mentha Canadensis, L. Above Berwick. Mentha piperita,L, Pond Hill. Mentha viridis, LL. Above Berwick. Cunila Mariana, L. Pond Hill. Kellia lanceolata (Pursh) Kuntze. Above Berwick. Lycopus Europeus, L. Above Berwick. Lycopus sinuatus,L. Pond Hill. Lycopus Virginicus, L. Nescopeck. 4edeoma pulegioides (L.) Pers. Long Pond. Melissa officinalis, L. Long Pond. Monarda fistulosa, L.., var. rubra, A, Gray. Nescopeck. Scutellaria galericulata, L. Long Pond, Scutellaria lateriflora, L. Long Pond. Physostegia Virginiana (L.) Benth, Above Nescopeck. Trichostema dichotomum, L. Neseopeck. Teucrium Canadense, L, Nescopeck. Polygonum arifolium, L. Long Pond. Polygonum emersum (Michx.) Britton. Long Pond. Polygonum Hydropiper, L. Pond Hill. Polygonum hydropiperoides, Michx. Long Pond. Polygonum Pennsylvanicum, L. Pond Hill, Polygonum punctatum, Ell Long Pond. Polygonum sagittatum, L. Pond Hill. Polygonum Virginianum, L. Long Pond. Fagopyrum esculentum, Mcench. Nescopeck. Sassafras officinale, Nees. Long Pond. Euphorbia hypericifolia, L. Pond Hill. Behmeria cylindrica (L.) Willd. Long Pond. Fuglans nigra, L. Pond Hill. Myrica asplenifolia (L.) Banks. Pond Hill. Betula lenta, L.. Long Pond. Betula lutea, Michx. f. Pond Hill. Betula nigra, L. River bank, near Pond Hill. Betula populifolia, Marsh. Long Pond. Alnus incana (L.) Willd. Long Pond. Alnus serrulata, Willd. Long Pond. Carpinus Virginiana (Marsh.) Sudworth. Pond Hill. Quercus alba, L. Pond Hill. 7 Quercus Muhlenbergii, Engelm., var. Aumilis (Marsh.) Britton. its Pond Quercus Prinus, L. Pond Hill. Salix cordata, Muhl. Above Berwick. Salix tristis, Ait. Long Pond. Populus grandidentata, Michx. Long Pond. Leptorchis Lil; 4ilitfolia (L.) Millsp. Long Pond, 66 Corallorhiza multifiora, Nutt. Long Pond. Gyrostachys cernua (L.) Kuntze. Pond Hill. Gyrostachys gracilis (Bigel.) Kuntze. Nescopeck. Peramium pubescens (Willd.) Morong. Long Pond. Pogonia ophioglossoides (L.) Ker. Long Pond.., Hlabenaria lacera (Michx.) R. Br. Lond Pond. Habenaria psycodes (1...) A. Gray. Long Pond. Habenaria tridentata (Willd.) Hook. Long Pond. Cypripedium pubescens, Willd. Long Pond. Dioscorea villosa, L. Long Pond. Tris versicolor, L. Above Berwick. Smilax rotundifolia, L. Long Pond. Polygonatum biflorum (Walt.) Ell. Pond Hill. Unifolium Canadense (Desf.) Greene. Long Pond. Untfolium racemosum (1..) Britton. Pond Hill. Lilium Philadelphicum, UL. Wong Pond. Uvularia perfoliata, L. Long Pond. Uvularia sesstlifolia, L. Wong Pond. Medeola Virginica, L. Long Pond. Pontederia cordata, LL, Long Pond. Ayris Caroliniana, Walt. Long Pond. Funcus acuminatus, Michx. Above Berwick. Funcus pelocarpus, E. Meyer. Long Pond. Arisema triphyllum (L.) Torr. Pond Hill. Acorus Calamus, L. Above Berwick. Alisma Plantago, L., var. triviale (Pursh) B. S. P. Above Berwick. Sagittaria graminea, Michx. Long Pond. Sagittaria variabilis, Engelm., forma gracilis (Pursh) Britton. Potamogeton Nuttallii, Cham. Long Pond. Potamogeton pusillus,L. Long Pond. Eriocaulon septangulare, With. Long Pond. Dulichium spathaceum (L.) Pers. Long Pond. Eleocharis acicularis (L.) R. & S. Long Pond. Eleocharis olivacea, Torr. Long Pond. Eleocharis palustris (L.) R. & S. Long Pond. Rhynchospora alba (1..) Vahl. Long Pond. Carex intumescens, Rudge. Pond Hill. Carex lurida, Wahl. Pond Hill. Panicum dichotomum, L. Nescopeck. Panicum scoparium, Lam. N escopeck, Panicum virgatum, L. Above Berwick. Andropogon provincialis, Lam. Above Berwick. Agrostis perennans (Walt.) Tuck. Long Pond. Bromus secalinus, L. Above Berwick. Hystrix patula, Meench. Long Pond. Pinus rigida, Mill, Pond Hill, Pinus Strobus,L. Pond Hill, 67 Tsuga Canadensis (L..) Carr. Pond Hill. Lycopodium annotinum, L. Pond Hill. = Lycopodium inundatum, L. Long Pond. Lycopodium lucidulum, Michx. Long Pond. Ophioglossum vulgatum, L. Long Pond. Botrychium ternatum (Thunb.) Sw., var. o6ligum (Muhl.) Milde. Pond Hill. Botrychium Virginianum (L.) Sw. Long Pond. Polypodium vulgare, L. Nescopeck. Pteris aqguilina, L. Long Pond. ¥ Adiantum pedatum, L. Long Pond. Asplenium Filix-femina (L.) Bernh. Long Pond. Asplenium platyneuron (1..) Oakes. Long Pond, Asplenium Trichomanes, L. Pond Hill. Camptosorus rhizophyllus (L.) Link. Pond Hill. LPhegopteris connectilis (Michx.) BSP. Long Pond. Phegopteris Dryopteris (L.) Feé. Pond Hill. LPhegopteris hexagonoptera (L.) Feé. Long Pond. Dryopteris acrostichoides (Michx.) Kuntze. Long Pond. Dryopteris Novaboracensis (L.) A. Gray. Long Pond. Dryopteris dilatata (Sw.) A. Gray. Long Pond. Dryopteris Thelypteris (L.) A.Gray. Long Pond. Cystopteris fragilis (L.) Sw. Pond Hill. Onoclea sensibilis, L. Above Berwick. Woodsia Ilvensis (L.) R. Br. Pond Hill. Woodsia obtusa (Spreng.) Torr. Long Pond. Dicksonia punctilobula (Michx.) A. Gray. Long Pond. Osmunda regalis, L. Long Pond. Lquisetum limosum, L.? Long Pond. Lquisetum sylvaticum, L. Above Berwick. On Rusbya, a New Genus of Vacciniacee from Bolivia. By N. L. Britron. Among the most interesting features of the vegetation of the the Eastern Cordillera of the Andes is the group of epiphytic gen- era of Vacciniacee. Dr. Rusby obtained a number of them, and — those here described are different from the rest in the presence of Stipules, a feature hitherto unrecorded in either Ericacea or Vac- ciniacee. The genus here proposed will in a measure commemo- rate his arduous and eminently successful work in exploring a difficult region, and one hardly before visited by a botanist. — 68 RusByA, gen. nov. Calyx tube continuous with the peduncle; campanulate, 5- angled; the limb erect, 5-lobed; lobes triangular, acute or acuminate; corolla tubular, narrowed above; stamens 10, nearly equalling the corolla; flowers otherwise as in TZhemistocleia Klotsch. Glabrous or minutely pubescent epiphytic shrubs, with slender, densely leafy branches; branchlets distinctly marked by the leaf- scars; leaves coriaceous, short-petioled, linear or ovate, obtuse, minutely apiculate, stipulate; stipules persistent, setaceous; flowers small, solitary, slender-peduncled; peduncles minutely bracted near the base. Two species, natives of Eastern Bolivia: 1. R. TaxrFoL1a.—Branchlets glabrous; leaves narrowly linear, one- nerved; peduncles 2 or 3 bracteate above the base. Yungas, Bolivia, Rusby, No. 2692; M. Bang, No. 2. R. PEaRcEt.—Branchlets pubescent; leaves ovate or ovate-lance- olate, pinnately nerved or indistinctly 3-nerved; peduncles I or 2 bracteate at the base; flowers red. Pintae (Pintoe), Bolivia, 10,000-11,000 ft., R. Pearce, Feb. 1867, Herb. Kew.; 4-6 ft. long on trees, Sandillani, 8,0o00-9000 ft., 1866, R. Pearce, Herb. Kew. Sir Joseph Hooker notes the presence of stipules on one of these Kew sheets. Botanical Notes. A New Station in New York State for Saxifraga aizoides, L.— This plant has been recorded as growing in but three or four places in this State. During a collecting trip, I found the plant growing in considerable abundance upon the dripping cliffs below the falls in Salmon River, Town of Orwell, Oswego Co. The nearest sta- tion known is the east branch of Fish Creek, Oneida Co., twenty miles away, where it was discovered many years ago by Knieskern and Vasey, and observed later by John A. Paine, Jr. (Cat. of Plants found in Oneida Co. and Vicinity 1865, p. 31). The west branch of Fish Creek and Salmon River have their sources very near to- gether; the former, however, flows south into Oneida Lake; the e 69 latter, west into Lake Ontario. Salmon River falls (110 ft. high) are in the south-eastern part of the town of Orwell. The river, at the place where the fall occurs, flows west, exposing the face of the cliff upon the north side of the ravine to the sun. It is upon this sunny southern exposure that the plant in question grows. A few plants were still flowering September 9, 1892, The mist from the falls and the water from the dripping rocks above keep the at- mosphere moist and cool. Potentilla fruticosa also grows pendent from the fotits with the Saxifrage, and at a distance somewhat resembles it. Primula Mistassinica also occurs in the same place. I searched very carefully for Pinguicula vulgaris but was unable to detect it, and have since found out that while it has been found at Taughhannock and at Portage with Saaifraga it has not been reported from the Fish Creek station.. W. W. RowLEeEE. An International Botanical Congress —Since the meeting of the botanists at Rochester, last August, it has become evident that an International Botanical Congress should be held in 1893 in this country. Upon the return of Professor Underwood from Genoa, with his report of what was done there, as well as of what was left undone, such a Congress seemed a necessity, especially when it was learned that the delegates to the Genoa Congress expected one to be held in America this year, in order to complete the work left bythem. The Columbian Exposition will doubtless bring many botanists to this country during the year. Most of these will attend our scientific meetings, if possible, and it seems wise to take advantage of this, and to arrange for a formal Congress. There being no committee to take charge of the work of preparing for the Congress, after a consultation with a number of botanists, it was thought advisable that the chairman of the Section of Botany of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, and the President of the Botanical Club, Dr. Wilson, should appoint a committee to take the matter in hand. Accordingly, on Decem- ber th, notices were sent to the following gentlemen with the re- quest that they serve on such committee: J. C. Arthur, L. H. Bailey, N. L. Britton, D. H. Campbell, J. M. Coulter, B. T. Gal- loway, Conway MacMillan, B. L. Robinson, William mong Le M. Underwood, George Vasey. 70 May I not ask that a hearty support be given to the committee by every botanist, to the end that the Congress may be every way successful. CHARLES E. BEssEy, Chairman Section G (Botany) A. A. A. S. Amarantus blitoides, 5. Watson. During last summer (1892) I discovered a single plant of Amarantus Odlitoides, growing along the track of the C. R. R. of N. J., about a-half mile south of the Sewaren, N. J., station on Long Branch Division. This plant is new to the 100-mile range, and the seed had evidently been brought by the cars. The plant was large and full of bloom, so that, no doubt, the locality will be permanently established. This species belongs in the far West, but I believe it has been reported by D. F. Day, as introduced into the neighborhood of Buffalo, N. Y. Professor Halsted tells me that he has seen it about New Brunswick, N. J. L- H. LIGHTHIPE. Viburnum prunifolium, L. var. globosum; Geo. V. Nash, n. var.—This differs from the type in several particulars. The most conspicuous one is in the fruit, which is globose, and but little more than half as large—about 4% of aninch. It differs also in the smaller cymes, and in its divaricately branching habit. The specimen I found only grew five or six feet high. The flowers appear before the leaves, and it was this which first drew my at- tention to it, and led me to watch it for further differences. Others may have found this variety also, and it is only reason- able to suppose they have. I found it in a section where the type grows in abundance, and it is strange that this variety has never been noted before. There is nothing in the Columbia College Herbarium like it, nor do I find reference in any work to such a form. Gro. V. NASH. - CuLiFTON, N. J., Dec. 12, 1892. Proceedings of the Club. TuEsDAY, JANUARY I0, 1893. Annual meeting. The president in the chair and twenty-eight persons present. . The committee appointed to draw up resolutions on the life 71 and works of Professor John Strong Newberry, submitted the fol- lowing: Resolved, That in the death of Dr. Newberry the Torrey Bo- tanical Club has lost an invaluable leader and friend. He was for ten years our president. Under his inspiring leadership the Club was greatly enlarged in numbers, in the scope of its aims, and in its scientific work. From his earliest days he followed assiduously the paths of science in many fields and in many ways; as student, as traveller, as explorer, as collector, as author, investigator, or- ganizer and teacher. He was eminent in all, but especially in his favorite pursuits of Geology, Palaeontology and Botany. He united many of the qualities of the greatest scientists; an inextinguish- able thirst for knowledge, an enthusiastic love of nature, indefatig- able industry, keen and wide observation, an exact and retentive memory, and a reflecting and discriminating judgment, that pon- dered and weighed with calm and philosophic care all questions, great and small, which a vast accumulation of material in a life of reading, study and observation, brought to the tribunal of his phil- osophic judgment. These great qualities enabled him to do much for Science, and, added to great aptness and facility in lucid exposition, placed him among the foremost of instructors. We owe his mem- Ory an endless obligation. At the meetings of the Club he con- tributed information on every branch of Botany, stimulating in- quiry, and enriching his remarks from vast stores of information, drawn from many fields of scientific research, and from the recol- lections of extensive travels, in which nothing observed seemed ever forgotten. Personally, he was the most charming of associates, tlle warm- est and most loyal of friends. Many a young student will miss the €ncouragement of his suggestions, and older ones the advantages of his gentle and helpful criticisms. He will be remembered as scholar, thinker, investigator, and educator; a most true gentleman, a noble intellect, a great heart overflowing with the broadest charity. _ Resolved, That the sympathies of the Club be extended to the widow and family of the deceased; and that a copy of these reso- ieg be forwarded to them, and entered upon the minutes of the ub. ; 5 AppIson BRowN, Committee | N. L. Brirron. Dr. Rusby announced the death on December 30, of Mr. Thomas Hogg, long an active member of the Club, and for many years one of its Vice Presidents, and remarked on his life and valuable services to American Botany and especially to Horticulture. The President 12 referred to the great loss which the Club had sustained, both in a scientific and a social way. It was resolved that a Committee of three be appointed by the President to prepare suitable resolutions. The President appointed as such Committee, Mr. E. S. Miller, Mr. Arthur Hollick, Rev. L. H. Lighthipe. A letter from Prof. C. Henry Kain announced the sudden death in Camden, N. J., of Mr. I. C. Martindale, one of the Club’s most distinguished corresponding members, and gave a brief sketch of his life and works. The President remarked upon his personal ac- quaintance with Mr. Martindale and testified to his high personal qualities and scientific attainments. Mr. A. A. Heller, of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, was elected an active member. Reports of the officers for last year were presented and ac- cepted. The Recording Secretary reported 168 active members on the roll, an increase of 25 during the year; the average attend- ance at regular meetings was 27. The Treasurer reported the total income of the Club during the year as $1448.24. The Editor reported that the number of pages in the 19th volume of the BULLETIN, published during the year, was 392, an increase over the preceding volume of 12 pages; No. I. of the 3d volume of the Memoirs was issued in February; No. II., containing Dr. Morong’s revision of the North American Naiadacez, is in press. The Cur- ator reported 3,492 specimens in the Herbarium, all from within the 100-mile circle. The following officers for the year 1893 were then unanimously elected: President, Hon. Addison Brown; Vice-Presidents, Dr. Timothy F. Allen.and Dr. Thomas Morong; Treasurer, Mr. Henry Ogden; Recording Secretary, Dr. H. H. Rusby; Corresponding Secretary, Mr. John K. Small; Editor, Dr. N. L. Britton; Associate Editors, — Dr. Emily L. Gregory, Miss Anna Murray Vail, Mr. Arthur Hol- lick, Prof. Byron D. Halsted, Mr. A. A. Heller; Curator, Miss Josephine E. Rogers; Librarian, Miss Effie A. Southworth. The President appointed the following standing committees: Committee on Finance, Mr. Justus F. Poggenburg, Mr. Wm. H. Rudkin ; Committee on Admissions, Mr. M. M. Le Brun, Mrs. S. B. Clarke ; Library and Herbarium Committee, The Curator, the _ 73 Libarian, Miss C. A. Timmerman, Rev. L. H. Lighthipe; Com- mittees on the Local Flora, Phanerogamia, Dr. Thomas C. Porter, Dr. N. L. Britton, Dr. H. H. Rusby; Cryptogamia, Elizabeth G. Britton, Maria O. Le Brun, Dr. Smith Ely Jelliffe. Prof. Byron D. Halsted read the announced paper of the even- ing, ‘‘ Some Results of a Study of Fruit Decays,’’ illustrated by diagrams. An abstract of the paper will be published in a subse- quent number of the BuLLETIN. Prof. Halsted exhibited a set of his distribution of 100 species of American weed-seeds, an account of which appears in the present BULLETIN. Mr. Lighthipe exhibited Amarantus blitoides from Sewaren, N. J. (See note on p 70) WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 25TH. Dr. Morong in the Chair and 29 persons present. Dr. Britton was elected Secretary pro. tem. Prof. H. W. Conn, of Wesleyan University, was elected an active member. The following papers were read and illustrated by specimens and Maps : ‘‘ Some new Species of Characez,’”” by Dr. T. F. Allen (to be published in a subsequent number of the BULLETIN). ‘« Preliminary Report on the Flora of Luzerne County, Penna.,”’ by Mr. A. A. Heller (published in the present BuLLETIN). ‘The Mosses of White Top Mountain, Virginia,” by Mrs. N. L. Britton. This will be incorporated in the account of the ex- ploration of Southern Virginia prosecuted during the last summer, to be published in a number of the MEmorrs. The Secretary stated that the memorial of Dr. Newberry would be presented at the second February meeting, and that Mr. J. H. Redfield had prepared an article on the life of Mr. I. C. Martin- dale, which would be printed in the March BuLLetin. Reviews of Foreign Literature. A Monograph of the Myxogastres. By George Massee. (Methuen & Co., London, 1892. 359 pages and 12 chromo litho- graph plates containing 313 figures.) | 74 An introductory portion, occupying twenty-seven pages, is oc- cupied by a discussion of the affinities and classification of the group. De Bary’s statement regarding want of relationship be- tween this group and the fungi are matched off against each other and finally dismissed as self-contradictory. The writer then draws a parallel between the methods of growth in the Myxomycetes and Mucorini, and judges that this is sufficient to indicate affinities, quoting from De Bary: “ We find it impossible to establish any strict homologies, but are limited to resemblances in form, structure and mode of life.’ That the simi- larities are sometimes striking cannot be denied, but that they should be interpreted as indicating affinity (community of descent) is by no means clear. It may be that Mr. Massee is acquainted with some other kind of affinity, not involving descent, and that the groups under discussion have this kind; indeed, it must be so, for if not there is a direct clash between this part of the discussion and one of his conclusions, which says: ‘There is no evidence in favour of the supposition that the Myxogastres are degenerated members of the vegetable kingdom, whereas the idea that fungi originated by differentiation from chlorophyll-bearing plant ances- tors is generally admitted.” How this very definite and very desirable conclusion was ex- tracted from any part of the previous discussion is an exceeding great mystery, but the curious can find it and four other conclu- sions, some even more mysterious, drawn up and numbered on page 21. The introductory portion of the book is, however, as a whole, interesting. The existence of hybrids between species of Myxo- mycetes is described, and a list given of the colors of the plasmodia of a considerable number of species. Many quotations from vari- ous investigators are here collated, and though sometimes used in ways never contemplated by their authors, are still valuable to those to whom the original works are not easy of access. Mr. Massee has settled many important points to his own satisfaction, but has ignored many facts and distinctions which will prevent his _ conclusions being widely or permanently accepted. For example, a the terms sporangium, plasmodiocarp and zthallium, are used with the most thorough indiscrimination. On page 26 Zudulina cylin- 7) drica and fasciculate 7richiacee are spoken of as zthallia. The six species of Lycogala are each described as plasmodiocarp, while the generic characterization begins: “Sporangia zxthallioid, grouped to- gether in an intricate manner, and forming a large plasmodiocarp in- closed in a thick, common cortex.” These terms might easily have been dropped if there had been no wish to preserve the distinctions which they imply, but no, they are again and again used, with the most bewildering impartiality, all three terms in one sentence de- scribing the same organisms. This condition is, of course, fruitful in peculiarities of classification and arrangement. It is, however, as a systematic work that this volume might be supposed to have its importance. As the author remarks in the preface, his facilities in the way of material and types were excep- tional, and hence the hope of a work of exceptional value was not unwarranted. The typographic beauty of the book increases the anticipated joy of using it, and the plates are the first to convey an idea of the delicate and curious beauty of form and color in this group. Fault has been found with these plates, and especially with the coloring, but it must be said that, as a whole, compared with previous publications, the plates are well calculated to sug- gest correct ideas of the organisms they represent. And there is another reason why these plates should be praised—they are the one redeeming feature of the book. It is a most uncomfortable realization that from what might have been a great addition to the literature of one’s favorite group there can come only increased confusion, and yet to say that the whole systematic portion of this work is entirely unreliable, and careless to the last degree, is the only way in which the truth can be told. It is the result, no doubt, of much labor, and contains a great and valuable supply of information; in fact, we must take it in spite of its defects as the only comprehensive and recent work on the subject; yet we can never have certainty nor even strong confidence in any statement, no matter how definite. The grossest carelessness pervades it, in the most important as well as the most trivial matters, so that it must be interpreted with the most care- ful eclecticism. : An amended edition is not likely to be issued, and we must make the best of the present one. Asa help in doing this the 76 following remarks and corrections are collated from a copy of the work of which parts have been given practical trial. That the supply of errors is in any way exhausted is not to be supposed, for each attempt at use in determination unearths a large crop of mis-statements and oversights. In the first place there are hosts of small blunders—typo- graphical errors they might, perhaps, be called, if they were not so numerous and confusing. Errors in the spelling of scientific names occur as follows: Siphotychium (p. 31, also p. 34), for Siphoptychium; Ellisiana (p.98), for Al/istanum,to agree in gender with Lamproderma, robusta (p. 99), for robustum ; cinera (p. 150), for cinerea; Trevelyana (p. 202), for Zrevelyan, the original name; melanospora (p. 325), for melanosperma, the original name; dealbata (p. 207), for dealbatum ; Ceinkowskia (p.197, p. 307, p. 336 and p. 337, twice), for Cienkowshia. In the preface and index this generic name is spelled correctly. And the arithmetic is no better than the spelling. Of twenty- five genera containing more than one species the number of species is wrongly stated in eight: Zuéulima 11 (correct number, 12); Enteridium 3 (5); Clathroptychium 3 (4); Cribraria 19 (20); Stemo- nitts 23 (24); Perichena 9 (10); Ophiotheca 9 (10); Badhamia 18 (17). The author says, “ Species 3,’ under Reticularia. As only R. lycoperdon appears, we must infer that one species was counted three times, or that the other two were lost, perhaps by the printer. It is, of course, a matter of small importance whether the number of species is correctly given so long as the species are correctly described. The above facts suggest, however, the very important question whether the author was in the same state of mind when he counted (?) the lines on his micrometer as when he failed to count his species. In the matter of citation of authorities for specific binomials this is a pioneer work. ' All the systems previously proposed seem to be used in different places, and several new ones. Through this peculiar combination of methods the result is reached that more than a quarter (118 out of 427) of the species have after them the expressive abbreviation “Mass.” But all theories fail of a complete explanation of this great massacre of ancient aahe ; ties and old friends. 17 For example, we have Arcyria cinerea, Mass. Now Bulliard applied this specific name in 1791, and Schumacher used the binomial in 1803, and nearly all authors since then have recog- nized this form and name. What is still more remarkable, A. pomiformis is reduced to a synonym under A. cinerea, though ante- dating that species by three years. There is also Stemonitis typhina, Mass., a binomial applied in the Flora Germanica in 1788. About ten more cases of this kind might be mentioned, where neither the author of the specific name nor of the binomial is cited, but some third party. The general tendency seems to be to recognize the “ first name under the genus,” but all kinds of tastes in such matters are consulted, as, for instance, Ophiotheca circum- scissa, Currey (p. 131). According to the synonymy the name Currey used was chrysosperma, Wallroth being the author of ci- cumscissa, and Rostafinski having first made the present combi- nation. Those for whom “the first name under the genus” has no special sanctity will write (p. 98) Lamproderma penetrale (Cke. & Ellis), instead of «ZL. Ellisiana Che.” Having decided that Zrichia persimilts, Karsten, and TJ: intermedia, Massee, are the same, zuter- media stands as the species, and persimilis is down as a synonym, though antedating the other name by twenty-one years. On page 191, in a note under Zyichia verrucosa, Berk., is men- tioned 7. adictyospora. Nospecies of this name is described, figured or mentioned in the index. The note in which the name occurs is taken by the author from his “ Revision of the Trichiacex,”’ and on the same page of that paper, ina note on 7: chrysosperma is another mention of this name, dictyospora, and still another, 7: Ar- cheri. There seems to be no other mention of these species, which leaves us in doubt as to whether they were lost, strayed, or stolen. It may be that Mr. Massee had intended to apply his name, Archeri, to L. verrucosa, and dictyospora, to T. Kalbreyeri, but this is only a guess. 7 The species published by Rostafinski as Chondrioderma sub- dictyospermum appears as C. dealbatum Mass., with a reference to “Didymium dealbatum B. and C., in Herb. Berk. n. 10,756.” Concerning this change the author remarks: “There appears to be no good reason why Berkeley’s specific name, though only a 78 manuscript one, should have been changed by Rostafinski. Well, if the unreasonableness of supplanting a published name by a “ manuscript one” is not evident to Mr. Massee, why did he not restore Stemonitis trechispora B. and C. for S. dictyospora, Rost., on page 83? Can it be that the cause of this inconsistency was that dealbatum could be put into another genus and have “ Mass.” after it? The fact that “ Mass.” is written for every cause and no cause preserves us from this suspicion, but leaves us no theory for explaining the difference in the treatment of two exactly parallel cases. On page 231 is Didymium neglectum, Mass. (nov. sp).” The fact that this name had been used by Berkeley for a species con- sidered by our author, (p. 224) to be synonymous with D. squamulosum, was perhaps overlooked by him—perhaps not. Considering the variability of D. farinaceum the characters on which the new species rests are of very uncertain value, but if it should prove to be distinct it might be well to call it D. Masseet. It is always well to havea species sufficiently described, but Didymium flavidum, Peck, is especially honored in being described twice, the first description (p. 247) purporting to be based on an «Authentic specimen from Peck, in Herb., Kew,’ while the second (p. 251) isacopy of Peck’s original description placed under the re- mark, “Owing to imperfect diagnoses and absence of type speci- mens, the following cannot be arranged in their respective sec- tions.” Appropriate names are a pleasant aid to the memory, but this is hardly sufficient to justify what we find on page 263, where having decided that three species of Craterium, vulgare, pyriforme, ~ and smznutum, should be looked upon as one, our author writes — them all down as C. confusum, Mass.!_ Well, the species had had | eight or ten names before, so that an additional one is a matter of no great importance. Sticklers for priority will probably call the - species C. minutum (Leers)—if they agree that the three are prop- erly merged. There is another Craterium minutum (p. 273) de- scribed by Kickx, which name must, of course, be changed. : Physarum compressum is given as a synonym of P. nefroideum (p. 286), but later on (p. 291) there is a long discussion as ta whether it is not the same as P. Phillipsit. 79 Badhamia varia, Massee (p. 319), is another new name made under the same circumstances as Craterium confusum. It includes Badhamia hyalina, capsulifera, utricularis and magna. The author is probably correct in uniting these species, but his new name will scarcely be accepted in this age of the world. Even a casual discussion of the classification would occupy so much space that one must be contented merely to state here the opinion that the group Peritrichie includes organisms having only the most slender geometrical similarities, and that a natural arrangement would compel a division into several orders, codrdi- nate with the other three. The genera Licea and Lindbladia are united to Tudulina, though these are as well-defined as most of those that remain. The value of a character is to be sought in its constancy, not in its size, and its importance may not be impaired in one group, be- cause it is variable in another. By reason of the fact that the genus Licea is no longer recognized, the following note under 77d- ulina Lindheimeri is curious: “ The type specimen is so thoroughly crushed that it is impossible to say whether the plant is a Licea or a Tubulina, but in all probability the latter, as there appear to be indications of the bases of crowded sporangia.” Physarum cespitosum, Peck, is referred to Tudulina. T. micro- spora Cke. (Grevillea, xvi. 116) is not described as a species, nor. mentioned as a synonym. Regarding the validity of Mr. Wingate’s family Orcadellacee the author says: «Iam afraid that such trivial characters are ad- mitted as sufficient for family characteristics, those left for generic distinctions will be reduced to inappreciable quantities.” This solicitude for generic distinctions is very commendable, but it should not have prevented the realization that Orcadella is about as different from its so-called relatives as a Myxomyces without columella and capillitium could well be. Rostafinski’s genus /eterodictyon is united, probably with great propriety, to Crbraria. Stemonitis and Comatricha are united under the former name. The distinctions previously alleged between these genera were purely imaginary, and it is well not to separate the species until better reasons can be found for so doing 80 In this group we have a good example of the author’s ideas and methods of classification. The major divisions of the Myxomycetes are first (p. 30) called orders, and their divisions sub-orders, but here (p. 69) we have the Colwmellifere spoken of as “the present section,’ and then “the two sub-sections.” On page 71 we have the formal headings, “Sub-sect. Stemonite’’ and “ Sub-sect. Lamprodeme,” but no distinctions between the two are alleged. Under the first “ sub-sect.” are Stemonitis, Siphopty- chium, Amaurochete, Brefeldia, Rostafinskia and Reticularia ; under the Lamprodermae come Enerthenema, Ancyrophorus, Lamproderma, Echinostelium, Raciborskia, and Orthotricha. Under the description of Lamproderma we read, “closely allied to Diachaea and Stemonitis, but differing from both in having the threads of the capillitium originating from the apex of the columella only.” On the next page, under the first species, ZL. véolaceum ; “a very distinct and beautiful species, characterized by having the sporangium flattened and umbilicate, and the almost colorless capillitium springing from every part of the columella.” Thus the first species does not possess the only distinctive generic character, and would be a Stemonitis if the definitions were strictly applied, and yet, by the arrangement here followed, five genera come between Lamproderma and Szemonitis, none of which bear any very close relation to either. Siphoptychium has been supposed to find its nearest ally in Zudulina, and the author goes so far as to suggest its descent from 7udbulina cylindrica, or some closely allied form, and yet he puts it in another order, between Stemonitis and Amaurochaete, to neither of which it has any affinity, except the other kind which does not involve descent. Ancyrophorus is a recently described genus from Denmark, allied to Exerthenema, but with the capillitium springing from the upper part of the columella as well as from its discoid apex. There is an undescribed American species. Orthotricha microcephala, Wingate, has been reduced by Schroter to Clastoderma Debaryanum, A. Blytt, but this genus is not men- tioned, nor the species either, in the present work, though Schrot- er’s reduction was published in 1889. If there are any valid distinctions of generic importance De- tween Raciborskia and Orthotricha they are not made plain by the _ 81 descriptions, and it is the opinion of Raciborski that the two may prove to be identical, yet in a note after Orthotricha Mr. Massee says: “I am not at all convinced in my own mind as to whether the present genus belongs to the present division or to the Peri- trichee.” ‘Which member of that very heterogeneous group could be imagined to have any affinity with Orthotricha is hard to guess, but then affinity seems not to be a necessary qualification for ad- mission into the Peritrichee. The next “Order,” Ca/otrichee is a rather compact one, but the limits of the included genera are utterly undefined, if we are to believe the author’s statements. Dermodium is reduced to Lyco- gaa, with the suggestion that D. conicum is nothing more than Lycogala epidendrum. Hemiarcyria is reduced to Arcyria! To reduce it to Zrichia would appear warrantable, and to reduce the three genera, and some others, to one, would be consistent, but there is little convenience and less reason in the present arrange- ment. To keep the number of genera the same, perhaps, we have a new genus, Heterotrichia, from South Carolina. All the charact- ers alleged are possessed in greater or less degree by species in other genera. Aemiarcyria is a much better genus, in that its characters are more important and constant. Hemiarcyria Ellis, Mass, separated from /. rubiformis solely on account of its warted spores, has been re-united with that species. In only four species of Zvichia is the number of spirals given. Counting the spirals is rather bothersome business, and the author is apparently not fond of mathematical exercise of this kind; still, he might have given the figures as others have counted them. Rostafinski’s distinction between Didymium and Chondrioderma was sufficiently flimsy, alleging that the sporangial walls in in Didymium always bear crystals of lime, while those of Chondrio- derma have a more or less compacted coating of amorphous Svanules. Reference to crystals is now dropped, leaving the only distinction in the relative compactness of the lime. Under the Rostafinskian method species were sometimes undecided in their generic preferences, but by the new arrangement it will be often difficult to tell where an individual should go, for example, C. or D. Spumarioides is frequently covered above by a smooth plate of lime, while on the sides and base the lime is in the form of scales, Or €ven a fine powder. 82 Chondrioderma ochraceum, Schroter, has the lime in furfuraceous condition, but for some reason (?) did not go with its relatives into Didymium. Chondrioderma and Physarum seem to get very close together. P. brunneolum has a polished, porcelain-like wall, and lime in the knots of the capillitium, and what is worse the lime has the form prescribed for Badhamia! -The next species leans strongly to- ward Tilmadoche, and the second toward Craterium. In the way of variety of terms nothing more would be asked. There is “‘sporangium,” “ peridium,’”’ “perithecium,” ‘ pileus,”’ and ‘ capitulum”’ (p. 234), though this last seems to be a slip for “ capillitium.’’ On page 282, third line from bottom, “ capillitium ”’ probably means “ columella;’’ and on 192, eight lines from bottom, ‘spores ’’ should, to make sense, read ‘* spines.”’ On page 349, among explanations of plates, ‘‘ Criéraria macro- carpa’’ seems to be a mistake for “* C. mzcrocarpa,’ a very different species. The index is incomplete, and even the alphabetic arrangement is in places out of joint. One finds, on referring to the ‘‘ Descriptions of Figures,” that numbers 85 and 86 are “ Badhamia fusea, Mass.” It appears to be a fine species, and we should be glad to know more of it, but alas, there is no more, no Ladhamia, or other species, of that name, no synonym, nothing in the index. Perhaps it is an error for fusca? No, there is a Stemonitis, and an Arcyria, of that name, but no Badhamia. There are a few remarks which may become classic. Here are two mild samples: ‘‘ Sometimes two or three sporangia are seated on a common stem, forming a plasmodiocarp.’’ The following concerns Fuligo varians: . ‘In the plasmodium condition often oc- curring amongst dead leaves as a bright yellow soft moss.’’ Why argue longer about the affinities of the group ? Index to Recent Literature Relating to American Botany. Aganisia tonoptera (Bot. Mag. t. 7270). _ . Agave angustissima, J. N. Rose (Gard. and For. vi. 5, 6; illus- trated). ne 83 Alloplectus Lynchet (Bot. Mag. t. 7271). Aster turbinellus, (Gard. and For. vi. 16; illustrated). Black-rot der Reben—Die Bekampfung der. (B. T. Galloway (Zeitscr. Planzenkrank. ii. 257, 258). Botanical Notes from Texas. ¥E. N. Plank (Gard. and For. vi. 15, 16). Botanical Section, Rochester Academy of Sciences—Report of. Miss J. H. McGuire. (Proc. Roch. Acad. ii. 44-48). Record of numerous localities for plants in the vicinity of Rochester, N. Y., among them Crepis diennis, shown by Miss Macauley from near Fairport. Californian Plants—Two new. F. T. Bioletti (Erythea, i. 16, 17). Guaphalium bicolor and Collinsia Franciscana. Catalogue of the Phanerogams and Ferns of Licking County, Ohio. Herbert L. Jones. (Bull. Sci. Lab. Denison University, vii. I-102, with map). ts A neatly printed list of 945 species and varieties, giving habitats, time of flowering and localities for the newer species. Champia parvula—Development of the Frond from the Carpospore. B. M. Davis (Ann. Bot. vi. 339-353; one plate). Claytonia—Distribution of the Seed in. J.C. Willis (Ann. Bot. vi. 382, 383; three figures. Composite, Observations on the, [—Edw. L. Greene (Erythea, i. 1-4). A discussion of the Tribe Vernoniacee. Stokesia levis (Hill) Green is the proper designation of S. Cyanea, L’Her.; Vernonia ciinita, Raf. (18 36) must replace V. Arkansana, D. C. (1838). Contributions Jrom the Botanical Laboratory of the University of — Pennsylvania. (Vol. i. No. 1, 800, pp. 73; thirteen plates; Philadelphia, 1892). Another medium for the presentation of the results of botan- ical research has been inaugurated by the officers of the depart- ment of botany in the University of Pennsylvania. The part here noticed was received some weeks ago, and would have been re- viewed before but for unusual demand on the time of the editor of the BuLLETIN. It contains seven papers (I). a monstrous speci- men of Kudbeckia hirta by Professor Rothrock, with two plates illustrating’a remarkable instance of folial and floral prolification ; IT. contributions to the history of Dion@a muscipula, by Dr. Mac- 84 farlane (reviewed by Dr. Bashford Dean in the January BULLE- Tin) III. An abnormal development of the Inflorescense of Dionea, by Mr. J. W. Harshberger; IV. Mangrove Tannin, by Professor Trimble, a chemical study; V. Observations on Apig@a repens by Professor Wilson, a critical investigation of the different kinds of flowers produced by this plant; VI. A Nascent Variety of Brunella vulgaris, by Professor Rothrock; VII. Preliminary ob- servations on the movements of the leaves of Me/ilotus alba and other plants, by Professor Wilson, assisted by Jesse M. Greenman, a subject which Prof. Wilson has been investigating for several years. He maintains as one of his principal results that the hot sun position, in which leaves point directly towards the sun, is a phenomenon brought about by an endeavor to reduce the amount of transpiration, and is dependent not on light alone, but also to a large degree on heat. The “Contributions” are a most welcome addition to our list of serial publications, and we hope they may be of frequent appear- ance. N:; LB; Echinocactus myriostigma. (Gard. Chron. xii. 789, fig. 120). Erythea, a Journal of Botany, West American and General. Ed- ited by Willis Linn Jepson and others, of the Department of Botany, University of California. The remarkable increase in interest in and the study of the Science of Botany during the past few years is well illustrated by the increased number of journals specifically devoted to presenting _ the results of that study. This is true, both of the Old World and the New. Since 1885 more than fifteen different serial publications have been commenced, and, we believe, all the older ones have been continued, and, for the most part, increased in size and circu- lation. And it is evident that the end of this process is not yet, for the pressure on the pages of the journals is continually aug- menting. We, therefore, cordially welcome any new enterprise, begun under competent direction, which will facilitate the presentation of botanical information. ie No. 1, Vol. i, of “ Erythea” is an octavo pamphlet of twenty- - eight pages, issued at Berkeley, California, in January, 1893- “Short articles, the results of local investigations in the field and : : 85 laboratory, will be published in every number, and will give, as is intended, a distinctively West-American character to the journal; it is not the purpose, however, to exclude communications from any part of the world, nor to neglect any department of botanical research.” The number contains two papers by Prof. Greene, and also an adverse criticism by him on Mr. Berthoud’s recent paper on the dissemination of plants by the buffalo; two papers by the editor, Mr. Jepson, one by Mr. F. F. Bioletti, and one by Mr. Marshall O. Howe, besides several reviews and a chapter of “ Notes and News.” The subscription price is $1.50 per year. We presume the journal will be issued monthly, but there is no indication of the frequency of publication in the number which lies before us. Noise. dB Galax aphylla. (Gard. and For. v. 604, with figure). Gottsche, Dr. C. M., Obituary. W.H. Pearson (Journ. Bot. xxx. p. 3). This is a most interesting account of the eminent Hepati- cologist, who has contributed so much to the knowledge of the liverworts of Mexico, Central America and the West Indies. Lpomea tuberosa—A Drift seed of. W.®B. Hemsley (Ann. Bot. Vi. 369-371; one plate). Record of the finding of the seed of this tropical species on the Hebrides. Suneberries—The. G. Nicholson (Garden, xlii. 540-541). A description of the Amelanchiers cultivated in England, ac- companied by a colored plate of A. Canadensis. Larrea cuneifolia e sulle Piante bussola—Sulla. G. Archangeli, (Bull. Soc. Bot. Ital., 1893, 46-48). Leiophyllum buxifolium. (Garden, xii. 559; illustrated). Lichenes Epiphylli Spruceani, a cl. Spruce in regione Rio Negro lecti, additis illis a cl Traill in regione superiore Amazonum lectis. J. Mueller. (Journ. Linn. Soc. xxix. 322-333). An enumeration of 64 species, with descriptions of new ones in the genera Lecania, Calenia, Lecidea, Patellaria, Lopadium, Arthro- nia, Arthroniopsis, Strigula and Phylloporina. Liverworts of West Virginia, A.W. Evans. (Flora of West Vir- inia, pp. 495-408, reprinted with one plate). Twenty-eight oe are denna blonin eating description of 86 Plagiochila Virginica, n. sp. Owing to the severing of Dr. Mills- paugh’s connection with the W. Va. Experiment station, the cata- logue was printed in haste and errors have crept in ; the following may be corrected: Radu/a, Dumortier, not Nees; /ungermanuia, Micheli, not Michaux; Plagiochila porelloides, Lindenberg, not Lindberg. bE. Ge Mammillaria fissurata. (Gard. Chron. xii. 789, fig. 130.) Mammillaria Radliaria, n. sp. (Monatsschr. Kakteenk. ii. 104- 105 ; illustrated). Description of a new species from Mexico. Melocactus Brongmarti. (Monats. Kakteenk. ii. 88 ; illustrated). Mosses of West Virginia Elizabeth G. Britton, (Contributions from the Herbarium of Columbia College, No. 32. Reprinted from the Preliminary Catalogue of the Flora of hte: Vas pp. 484-494, two plates). J Forty-two genera, and eighty-four species are enumerated, mostly gathered in the vicinity of Morgantown in the month of i July, 1892. Dicranodontium Virginicum and D. Millspaughu, are 2 described and figured as new species, the latter replacing Campy- lopus flexuosus, Sull. (Musci. of the U.S. p. 19 not Bridel.) of the — ; Manual. i Dis G2: Mountain Region af Clear Lakze—The. Willis L. Jepson (Erythea, i. 10-16). An account of the flora of the vicinity of this lake, situated in the Coast Range, seventy miles north of the Bay of San Francisco. A number of rare species were secured, and among them two novelties: Streptanthus hesperidis and Arcto- staphylos elegans. : Musci Americe Septentrionalis, ex operibus novissimis recensitt et methodici dispositi. Renault et Cardot (Revue Bryol. xix. 65-96, 1892, continued). In the preface the authors claim to have arranged according to their alliance 1350 species of North American mosses, but they do” not include those of Mexico or Central America. This list does not claim to be a critical revision, but simply an enumeration t date of all the published species since the issue of the Manual, giv- 3 ing their range geographically, also indicating whether endemic or common to both Europe and the U.S. This first part includes 710 species, the varieties not numbered. We note one erro! 87 under Leucobryum, p. 79, the authors referring L. sediforme, Muller. as a variety under L. minus, Hpe. Either they have misunder- stood my statements in the BULLETIN xix, pp. 189-191, or they have recently received material agreeing with Muller’s species. We have a portion of this material recently received and entirely agree with Muller that Z. sediforme does not occur in the United States. BG, Be Novitates occidentales, I. Fdw. L. Greene (Erythea, i. 4-7). Pulsatilla multiceps, Potentilla scopulorum, P. ambigens, P. Platt- ensis, var. (?) leucophylla, P. Micheneri, Sanicula nemoralis, S. Sseptentrionalis, S. saxatilis, Senecio Blochmanae and Microseris indivisa are described as new. Opuntia prolifera (Meechan's Month. iii. 1-2; colored plate). Plantago media, J. Franklin Collins (Gard. and For. x. 622). Record of the occurrence of this European species at Provi- dence, R. I. Preliminary List of the Flowering and Fern Plants of Lorain County, Ohio—Additions to the Albert A. Wright. (Oberlin College, Lab. Bull. No. 1, Suppl., pp. 11, 1893). A list of 106 species and varieties additional to those recorded in the list of plants of the same area, published by Prof. Wright in 1889, with some corrections, and a number of changes in nomenclature. Preliminary List of the Mosses of Washington County, Pa. A. Linn and J. S. Simonton (pp. 8, no date [1893]). One hundred Species are enumerated. Salix balsanifera. C.S. Sargent (Gard. and For. vi. 28; illustrated). Sand-dune Flora of Lake Michigan, E.J. Hill (Gard. and For. vi. 15). Sarracenia—The History of. M. T. Masters (Gard. Chron. xiii. 11, 12; illustrated). Dr. Masters gives a very interesting account of the history of our Pitcher-plants, from the time of Lobel (1570). Strobasidium, Nonveau Genre a’ Hymenomycetes heterobasidies. G. de Lagerheim and N. Patouillard (Journ. de Bot. vi. 465-469; two figures), Description of this new genus with two new species from Ecuador. 88 Solanum Seaforthianum. W. Watson (Garden, xlii. 518, 519; colored plate). : A climbing species, native of the West Indies. Teratological Notes. Marshall A. Howe (Erythea, i. 18, 19). Record of medium floral prolification in Leptosyne maritima and phyllody of pistils in Zfohum. Umbelliferae—Studies in the Californian—I. Willis L. Jepson. (Erythea, i. 8-10). Angelica Caltfornica, Leptotaenia Californica, Nutt., var. platy- carpa and Peucedanum robustum are described as new. Woody Plants of Manhattan in their Winter Condition. A. S. Hitchcock (pp. 20, Manhattan, Kansas, 1893). A descriptive list of 48 trees and shrubs. Mr. Hitchcock has followed the code of nomenclature adopted at the Rochester Meeting of the Botanical Club of the A. A. A.S. We note one or two deviations from those rules. Rhus Canadensis, Marsh. (1785) is taken as the name of the Canada Sumach, but this is a homonym of &. Canadensis, Mill.(1767). 2. aromatica, Ait. (1789), appears to be the acceptable name. Symphoricarpos vulgaris, Michx. (1803), is antedated by S. orbicularis, Moench. (1794). Undescribed plants from Guatemala—X. John Donnell Smith. (Bot. Gaz. xviii. 1-7; one plate.) Sloanea pentagona, Xanthoxylum foliolosum, Ouratea podogyna, Fuchsia arborescens, var.(?) megalantha ; Hauya Rodriguesii, Hauya fleydeana, Parathests micrantha, Bumelia pleistochasia, B. liogyna, Styrax conterminum, Ehretia Luxiana, Juanalloa Sargii, Tynanthus Guatemaltensis, Schlegelia cornuta and Aigyphila falcata are de- scribed as new. Potentilla Donnell-Smithii Focke, Bot. Gaz. xvi. 3, proves tobe P. heterosepala, Fritsch. Juanalloa Sargii is beauti- fully figured from one of Mr. Faxon’s drawings. BULLETIN OF THE TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB. —PLATE. CXL, Ly Se Ss = Ss SS PNR ee, <7} wast q “- Fi ALLEN: A new species of Nitella from the Valley of Mexico, collected in December, by Mr. Pringle, I decide to name MVitella formosa. It may be described concisely as Nitella diarthrodactyla, homoeo- phylla, monoica, flabellata, gymnocarpa, closely related to J. tenuissima, Kiitz. It has the appearance of a gigantic ¢enuzssima, attaining the size of 12 to 18 inches in length and diffusely branched. It differs, however, from ‘¢enutssima, not only as re- gards its size, but in that the fruit is subterminal only. The oospore is slightly larger than /enuisstma, in the new species averaging about .340 mm. long by .305 mm. wide, with seven striae. The membrane of the oospore is minutely granular, while that of zenuissima-is covered with much coarser granules or reticulations. ' I have also received from Japan a new JVitella, which is allied to our Mitella oligospira, and as in our species, the oogonium is single. The terminal extremities of the enveloping cells of the oospore become contracted, leaving spaces between the cells be- neath the coronula of mature specimens; the oospore is .340 by a 120 .285 mm., and its membrane is covered with conical elevations. This species I call VV. Japonica. A new variety of Chara Hydropitys, which I propose to call var. Mexicana, has been collected by Mr. Pringle. The stem and leaves are very slender, the stem .260 mm. diameter, the leaves -230 mm. in diameter. The leaves are ten in number in the verticil, with six or seven nodes, the lowest of which is naked: three or four of the nodes are corticated: there is usually one naked terminal with four or five bracts, like a tuft, all of equal size. The antheridium .245 mm. in diameter, the oospore .435 mm. long by .245 mm. wide, with nine or ten faint stri. The spines on the stem are very small and scattered, broad at the base .o4o mm. broad and .035 mm. long. A new variety of Chara gymnopitys, to be known as var. Keukenis, from Lake Keuka in the State of New York. The cor- tex of the stem is irregular, the plants very small, and, from this locality, very much encrusted with lime. The oospore is .440 mm. long by .260 mm. wide, with nine very faint strie. The antheridium is .300 mm. in diameter. A Neglected Species of Hieracium. By N. L. Britton, (PLATE CXLYV.) HrerActuM GREENH, Porter and Britton, n. sp. Pilosella spathulata, Sch. Bip. Flora, xlv. 439 (1862), not H. spath- ulatum, Sheel. HH. Marianum, var. spathulatum, A. Gray, Syn. Fl. i. Part ii. 455 (1886). Stem glabrous up to the branches, erect, rather slender, leafless - or rarely with 1 or 2 leaves, 11%4°-2%4° high. Radical leaves tufted, ascending, broadly spathulate, oblong or obovate, obtuse at the apex, narrowed at the base, mostly petioled, glandular-denticulate or entire, villous-pubescent or somewhat hispid on both sides, 4’—7’ long, 1’~2’ wide; heads corymbose-paniculate, several or numerous, 30—40-flowered, rather slender-peduncled, 8/10” broad; peduncles and branches canescent-tomentose and glandular ; in- volucre 5” high, its bracts in 1 series, linear, acute, densely. pilose and glandular; flowers bright yellow; achenes columnar, truncate; pappus not copious, brownish. 121 In dry soil, Tuscarora Mountain, Huntingdon Co., 1845 (Porter); Two-Top Mountain, Franklin Co., Penn., 1846 (Traill Green) ; Mountains of Clinton Co., Penn., 1842 (McMinn); Peaks of Otter, Virginia (Britton). May-June. Differs from. A. venosum, L., in its more elongated, villous- pubescent leaves, stouter stem, larger heads and very pilose and glandular, principal bracts of the involucre. Differs from H. Marianum, Willd., in its entirely glabrous, leaf- less or very rarely 1~2-leaved stem, larger heads and _ pilose- glandular involucre. Botanical Notes. Note Explanatory—Several wide-awake botanists have noticed a mistake in nomenclature made in my article on “ Orchids” in the February number of the BULLETIN, and uttered remonstrances. It is a good sign to see that innovators are held responsible for a strict application of their own principles, and I am quite ready to confess it when I go astray. On page 33, Cathea, of Salisbury, is substituted for Calopogon, of Robert Brown. This is entirely wrong if we follow the rules recently adopted at Rochester and accept the Species Plantarum of Linnzeus of 1753 as our start- ing point. The name in that case should be Limodorum tuberosum, LAap. Pi. 950(175 3). The mistake in the text arose from a /apsus emendationis. That article was written before the Rochester meet- ing, and designed as a paper to be read before the A. A. A. S. Botanical Club. At that time I had taken Linnzus’ first edi- tion of the Genera (1737), as my starting point for genera, and under that rule Cathea would be correct. Unfortunately in the revision of the paper for the BULLETIN, I neglected to make the Proper correction for this genus, although it was done in other parts of the same paper. A word further may be said in regard to Limodorum. The de- Viation from the Linnazan name seems to have began with Swartz in 1799 (Act. Ups. vi. 78), who adopted it from Tournefort. He was followed by Willdenow in 1805 (Sp. PI. iv. pt. i. 105), who called our plant Cymbidium pulchellum, and applied the name Limodorum mainly to various species of Epidendrum, which he sep- arated from that genus. Subsequently L. C. Richard applied this 122 name to a single European species (Ovchis adortiva L.), in which he has been followed by Bentham and Hooker. So far as I know, Michaux is the only botanist since the time of Swartz who has adhered to the Linnzean name Lzmodorum tuberosum. Everybody has followed in the wake of Brown and called the plant Calopogon pulchellum. Tuomas Morona. Note on Trifolium medium.—We received last July from Mr. ~ Ira Parker, of Houlton, Me., some very interesting specimens of Trifolium medium, L.. in which the heads were replaced by com- pound umbels, more or less completely formed. The specimens showed every gradation from compound umbels with very short pedicels to those with pedicels fully two inches long. The flowers were all pale, smaller than normal and apparently abortive. Mr. Parker informs us that several stalks from the same root were similarly malformed. The tendency to vary in the direction of a compound umbel is an interesting confirmation of the general belief that the head is a sessile umbel. F. L. Harvey. Orono, ME., JAN. 15, 93. Variegation accounted for—Last week some Callas were © brought to me because of their peculiar construction and colora- tion. One stalk had, for example, a large spathe and two smaller ones within, thus constituting what is commonly known as a “double” calla. Another stalk had a “bloom”’ with the ordinary single spathe, but close to and enclosing it was a leaf that might at first be easily mistaken for the ordinary spathe. It, however, had a petiole of an inch in length, and the venation was strictly that of a calla leaf, while in color it was white with the exception of the tip and the outer border, which was green. A leaf separate from the examples above mentioned was also brought. It had the long petiole and the ordinary shape of a calla leaf, but fully a quarter of the central portion of the blade was white, and the etiolated part blended gradually with the surrounding green. The three samples gave the whole story of the intimate condition be- tween the spathe and the ordinary calla leaf, and the ‘“ variega- tion” of the latter seemed only a result of a tendency to become a spathe in color, if not in shape. Byron D. HALSTED. RutGers CoLtecE, Jan. 27, 1893. bas 123 Reviews of Foreign Literature. A Contribution to our Knowledge of Seedlings. By Sir John Lubbock, Bart. M.P Fo Ros... D: Ci Ly D. (Kegan Paul, Trench, Triibner & Co., London, 1892). Sir John Lubbock has in this work made a very important con- tribution to our knowledge of plants. The work occupies a field which has heretofore received comparatively little attention. Works upon systematic botany have been compiled repeatedly, until now Bentham and Hooker's “Genera Plantarum” may fairly be supposed to include nearly all the forms of spermatophytes en- titled to stand as genera. In the meantime there remains much to be done in the way of research upon the life-histories of these plants, especially upon the structure of the embryo and its germi- nation. It is into this field that Sir John Lubbock has pushed with characteristic vigor, and the result is this work “On Seed- lings” in two volumes, and each volume of over 600 pages. In the short preface the author briefly states the subject of his work, and mentions those who have assisted him in it. The first 77 pages are devoted to an introduction consisting of gener- alizations upon the several parts of the embryo both before and during germination. Following this are about I119 pages, de- voted, Ist, to seeds and their germination in the order as a whole, and 2d, a detailed description of the seed, their germination, and the seedlings of the species studied in the order. Species repre- senting nearly every order in Bentham and Hooker’s “Genera Plantarum” were studied. The arrangement of orders is the same as in that work, of which, indeed, this work on seedlings might well be considered a fitting supplement. The following are the orders in which the largest number of species were studied: Ra- nunculacez, 26 species; Cruciferee, 57 sp.; Malvacex, 26 sp.; Le- guminosz, 95 sp.; Rosacee 22 sp.; Onagrariee, 20 sp.; Compo- “site, 91 sp.; Labiate, 25 sp. A third part of the work is devoted to the bibliography of the subject in two divisions, Ist, general; 2d, special. Finally, a full index is appended. The introduction is the part of the work that will excite most attention. Many facts are incorporated in it which have already been recorded, especially that part of the descriptions which de- tail the development ane! structure of the ovule and the agers a. 124 of the parts of the embryo in the seed; yet the author has ven- tured to go farther than anyone before him, and has pointed out just how different forms of embryo have originated. This gives to the old facts a new charm. As the author informs us on the first page, these propositions have already been made in the “Jour. Linn. Soc. Vols. xxii.-xxiv.,” and as he now reprints them, we feel assured that his confidence in his own interpretation of nature is not shaken by subsequent observation and reflection. All may not agree with him in his interpretations, but no one can question his accuracy of observation. It remains for his critics to draw conclusions which will harmonize better with the facts. Some of these propositions may be profitably mentioned. 1. The inversion of the ovule is of advantage to the plant in that it brings the micropyle in such a position as to increase the probability of fertilization. Here the author confirms the con- clusions of others and promises “to enter into the question more fully on a future occasion.” The writer of this review has sug- gested an entirely different explanation of this modification of the ovule and seed, i. e., that it is due to the advantage gained by the correlation of the parts of the embryo, to the external appendages of the seed, thereby securing a favorable position for the embryo during germination. (See “Science Vol. xx. No. 504, September 30, 1892.”) 2. Unequal, unsymmetrical, lobed, and auricled cotyledons are to be explained by the crowding of the embryo in the seed, and its tendency to occupy all the available space within the coats. 3. The position of the embryo is often changed to accommodate its parts to the form of the seed. Embryos with accumbent and incumbent parts are, in many cases, thereby explained. «Now if from the form of the pods, or for any other reason, it is an ad- vantage that the seed should be compressed, then the thickness of the cotyledons remaining the same, it is better that the radicle should be accumbent; while on the other hand, in a thicker or globular seed the incumbent arrangement is most convenient.” In general, the author believes that the form of the seed determines the form of the embryo. : 4. It seems desirable that the cotyledons should be raised above _ the surface of the ground. This leads to a correspondence between the length of the hypocoty] and the length of petiole of the coty- 125 ledons. The general rule is then “ that the cotyledons are sessile when they are raised by the growth of the hypocotyl, while they are petiolate when they take their origin close to the ground.” Connate petioles serve the purpose of forming a stronger support for the cotyledons than would be afforded if they remained separate. 5. Narrowness of the cotyledons or their division into narrow segments is attributed to the greater facility with which they may be withdrawn from the seed-coats. Also, narrowness of the cotyledons in some cases “ enables the plant to make them lie conveniently in a globose seed.” The generalizations with which each order is introduced, are especially interesting and valuable. Here, as well as in the de- scription of each species, the cotyledons are given prominence. The Onagrariez is as fair a choice among the orders as could be made. The seedlings of quite a number of its species have coty- ledons in which a secondary growth occurs. The seedlings of nothera Bistorta are described as follows: ‘Immediately after germination the cotyledons are oblong, obtuse, entire, sessile with a few long, scattered, glandular hairs, especially at the base. Hypocotyl with a few glandular hairs at the apex. Cotyledons often unequal, owing to their greater or less development in the seed, and one folding over the other. “Six days after germination the base has become elongated, petiole-like, and glandular-pubescent, suddenly narrowed to a short petiole, or subsessile; the upper half remains rotund and glabrous except at the base and possibly a few short hairs under- neath. “Eight days after germination (fig. 367) they have elongated 3 considerably, the upper true cotyledonary part enlarging, but otherwise remaining unaltered, while the foliar basal and narrow part has become linear, entire or sometimes with a minute tooth on either side, glandular-pubescent, suddenly narrowed at the very base. “ The lower portion elongates greatly, and the ultimate stage of the cotyledons (fig. 368) is linear, tapering at the base into a petiole; upper part or true cotyledon rotund or oval, entire gla- brous, very short without midrib, lower part linear terminating abruptly in the upper part, tapering gradually to the base, with one or two minute and distant teeth on each side, thinly hairy, . 126 greyish-green with an evident midrib sunk on the upper surface, and prominent beneath; petiole subterete, flattened above, very thinly hairy, or at length nearly glabrous. “First eight leaves radical, alternate, linear, obtuse, tapering at the base into the petiole, thinly silky with appressed pubescence, minutely and distantly toothed at the margin, greyish green, more or less distinctly marked near the margin with black dots, with a very distinct, colorless mid-rib, flattened above, thinly hairy at the margins, colorless. (Thirty-four days after germination.)” One of the striking features of the volumes to students especially interested in American plants, is the small number of North American species studied. Descriptions of seedlings of several garden vegetables are included. Among these, most prominent, perhaps, are the common radish (Raphanus sativus), common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum) and pepper (Capsicum sp.). Seedlings of many cultivated orna- mental species are studied. Many of the species are rarely seen outside of Kew Gardens. The author uses the old term “radicle” as a name for the axis of the embryo while in the seed, but steadily applies the word “hypocotyl” to the same organ during germination. The be- ginnings of the root-system of the plant is scarcely touched upon, although the origin of the first roots have been shown by Holm (Mem. Torr. Bot. Club. Vol. ii. No. 3) to determine in a consid- erable measure the habit of the plant. The volumes are profusely illustrated with outline sketches. All will agree, I think, that more such books are needed. Itis — only when as careful researches are made upon the life-histories of seed producing plants, as cryptogamic botanists find themselves obliged to make upon the lower plants, that we shall discover how much yet remains to be done to complete our knowledge of the e Spermaphytes. There are many fields as inviting as was the one chosen by Sir John Lubbock. W. W. RowL_Lee. On the Simplest Form of Moss. Karl Goebel. (Ann. Bot. vi. 355-360, Plate XXII. 1892). . . The author considers Buxbaumia an almost ideally simple moss, because the sexual organs are borne almost directly on the © _ protonema, in this approaching the ferns. The protonema is said 127 to be similar to that of certain species of Zrichomanes, and is compared with that of Sphagnum, Andreea and Metzgeriopsis. The Sporogonium is said to be most nearly allied to that of Diphyscium, and to possess no true seta, as the calyptra is ruptured by the ex- pansion of the theca, and not by the elongation of the pedicel, as in the true Bryinee. The plate illustrates the variation of the sporophylls in Onxoclea Struthiopteris, and Botrychium Lunaria. The alliance with Diphyscium is contrary to the views of Lindberg and Braithwaite, though more in harmony with those of all the older authors, and most modern ones. Also the growth of the sexual organs upon the protonema, and the complexity and vari- ability of the peristome would seem rather to indicate a higher organization. The paper noticed above abounds in theories of the most slender probability, stated as ascertained facts. For example, in a paragraph of eleven lines (p. 357) the following propositions are given. 1. The organization of the sporogonium of Burbaumia “is rudimentary as compared with that of the true Bryinez.”’ 2. “It somewhat recalls that of Sphagnum and Andreea.” 3. “It has no true seta, but merely an absorbent organ which penetrates into the rudimentary stem of the moss-plant.” 4. “This organ gives off a number of rhizoids which absorb nourishment from the stem.” 5. “Consequently in this form the calyptra is ruptured, not by the elongation of the seta as in the Bryinez, but by the expansion of the theca of the sporogonium.” As Professor Goebel gives no reasons for his inferences, dis- cussion is out of the question. The apparent statements of fact are contrary to the conditions observed in a recent study of Bux- | baumia, which gives, in the main, the same results as those of Schimper, from whose descriptions and plates it appears that the capsule (especially of B. indusiata) is, if anything, the most com- plex of any of the mosses; the seta is entirely homologous with that of other mosses, does not give off rhizoids, but fits into a socket of the short stem, and ruptures the calyptra by elongation. The fact that the marginal cells of the leaves of Buxbaumia grow out into long filaments is given as a reason for supposing a hat the leaves of this genus are in some way more fr otonemal i 128 than those of other mosses, regardless of the facts that 4. Havanica has entire leaves, and that there are plenty of instances among mosses and hepaticz where the marginal cells and even those of other parts of the leaf are produced into cilia. Indeed, Professor Goebel seems here to have undertaken a gratuitous labor, for all are agreed that the plant body in mosses and foliose hepaticz grows from the protonema. The peculiarity of Buxrbaumia in the respect seems to be that it does not grow so large. The strangest thing about Sw«daumia is, perhaps, its physio- logical arrangement. The sexual generation, instead of leading the life of a parasite upon its parent, as in other mosses, is richly provided with chlorophyll, and apparently needs the parent only as a means of attachment to the substratum. O. F. Cook. Bulletin de l Herbier Boisster. Sous la Direction de Eugéne Autran, Conservateur de 1’ Herbier. (Tome i. No. 1, 8vo. pp. 32, avec deux planches, Geneve, 1893). We chronicle with much pleasure and interest, the appearance of another new journal, published under the auspices of the great herbarium of M. Boissier at Chambesy, near Geneva. It is planned to issue the Bulletin as material becomes available, and to produce a volume of 400 pages each year. The first number contains two papers: (I) Les Genres Achatocarpus, Triana et Bosia, L., et leur Place dans le Systeme Naturel by Dr. Hans Schinz and M. Au- tran, illustrated by two plates. Achatocarpus is a South Ameri- can genus placed by Triana in relationship with Azvina in the Phytolacacezee, where MM. Schinz and Autran conclude it be- longs. It isreferred by Bentham and Hooker to the Amaran- taceze and by Baillon to the caries sees Four new species are described, all Paraguayan. The second paper is by Dr. Geo. E. Post, and is Part V. of his descriptions of and notes on Syrian plants. Nik Ss Proceedings of the Club. Turspay, FEBRUARY 14TH, 1893. The President in the chair and thirty-five persons present. Mrs. L. Briick, of Hoboken, N. J., and Mr. Geo. M. Beringer, _ of Camden, N. J., were elected active members. 2 129 The assent of the Club was given to a proposition of the Council of the Scientific Alliance of New York, that a joint meet- ing be held in memory of Prof. John S. Newberry. The first paper of the evening was then read by Dr. H. H. Rusby, entitled «Account of some new Species of Polypetale from Bolivia.” The paper was a report upon the study of 280 numbers collected by Mr. Miguel Bang, representing 271 species and varieties, of which 58 were unknown and 4 others were repre- sented only by manuscript names or by names published without descriptions. The specimens of these new species were exhibited, a number of them being compared with other specimens exhibited of related species. Dr. Rusby announced that his method of publishing his enumeration of Mr. Bang’s plants would be in sets of 1000 numbers, each set being published in two parts, each part to constitute a number of the Memoirs of the Club. The first part, running through the Composit of the first thousand num- bers, would occupy a number of the next volume of the Memoirs. The second paper was then presented by Mr. Henry Kraemer, being his report as chairman of the Field Committee for 1892. The report was remarkably full in the enumeration of every detail connected with the work of the committee, and was filed with the Secretary. Dr. Britton spoke of two forms of Vaccinium vacillans, co!- lected at Forked River, N. J., and exhibiting two markedly distinct forms of corolla. His attempts to associate these with the corres- ponding fruits had not up to the present proven satisfactory. He also referred to the Rudus villosus, var. (?) Aumifusus, which had now turned up in a number of localities. An interesting discussion followed on the appearance and habit of the Velumbo lutea. Mr. Rudkin, in reply to a question by the President, stated that the plant had not only held its own at Swartzwood Pond, N. J., but had increased greatly. It was found in full bloom about the 1st of August. The flowers are 9 or 10 inches in diameter, and the petals are few and loose as compared with those of Castalia; the largest leaves are 2 feet or more in diameter. Dr. Morong remarked upon the great length and in- creasing thickness downward of the portion of the plant which was imbedded in the mud; in this respect it is similar to the ~ Orontium aquaticum. So large and thick are these portions that = 130 the plant bears removal very well, being capable of transportation to long distances. Dr. Britton exhibited a copy of Prof. Conway Macmillan’s “Metaspermz of the Valley of the Minnesota,’ which he re- garded as the most extensive and complete local flora ever pro- duced. It is published by the Geological Survey of the State of Minnesota. WEDNESDAY EVENING, FEBRUARY 22d. Vice President Morong in the Chair and seventeen persons present. The following papers were read: «A Memorial of Professor John Strong Newberry,” by N. L. Britton. The paper was illustrated by specimens of plants named in honor of Prof. Newberry and by a portrait, and is published in this number of the BULLETIN. Remarks were made by Dr. Arthur Mead Edwards, Mr. Lighthipe and the Chairman. «Notes on some plants of the Yadkin River Valley, N. C.,” by John K. Small. The paper was copiously illustrated by specimens and was discussed by Dr. Britton and Dr. Morong. Index to Recent Literature Relating to American Botany. Additions to the State (Indiana) Flora from Putnam County. Lu- cien M. Underwood (Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci. 1891, 89-91). Eustichia Norvegica is reported from sandstone rocks at Fern, the fourth station in America. Bread-Fruit Trees in North America. F.H. Knowlton (Science XL. 24, 25). The author traces the former existence of the genus Artocarpus through the North American continent to Greenland, in cre- taceous and tertiary times, as evidenced by remains which are manifestly to be referred to this genus, although classed by differ- ent authors at various times under the genera Myrica and Aralia. At, Characee of America. T.F. Allen (Part II. Fascicle 1, large 8vo., p. 8, 14 plates; published by the author, 10 E. 36th St., New York). The first part of Dr. Allen’ s work on our Characea was pub- lished several years ago. It deals with the morphology, life his- ; 131 _tory and affinities of the group, their classification, and contains a tabular key for the identification of genera and species. This first installment of Part II. deals with eight species of Mitel/a, several of which are new. It is begun by a revised synoptical key to the thirteen species which Dr. Allen now has from America, five of which he has made known. Fourteen plates are issued with the fascicle, eight of them lithographs and six photogravures, made directly from herbarium specimens, and illustrating very well the habit and mode of branching of the plants. . si ae Be» Composite—Observations on the—IT, Edward L. Greene (Erythea, 1. 41-45). Prof. Greene refers his recently proposed genus Diolettia to Trichocoronis and discusses Eupatorium and its allied genera. Conifere—Notes on West American,1. J. G. Lemmon (Erythea, i- 48-5 2). Mr. Lemmon describes his new varieties of Psewdotsuga taxi- Jolia; one, var. suberosa from Arizona and New Mexico; the other, var. elongata from the base of Mt. Hood, Oregon. He also takes issue with Dr. M. T. Masters as to the common name of this tree, Maintaining that it should be Douglas Spruce, not Douglas Fir. Corky Excrescenses on the Stems of Zanthoxylum—The Nature and Development of. C. A. Barber (Annals of Botany, vi. No. 22) The author first describes the development of the thorn at whose base the corky cushion always originates. The thorn is said to complete its growth during the first summer, growing from a zone of meristematic cells near its base. In the autumn begins . the development of the cork-cells, probably from the same meri- stem which produced the cells of the thorn, though the author does not expressly state this. Yearly deposits of this cork-tissue are made which he compares to the annual rings of Pinus stems. As this cushion increases, the tissues near the base of the thorn gradually weaken; finally a rupture occurs by which it is detached, sometimes leaving a slight scar. In regard to the biological significance of this corky growth no explanation is attempted; as to determine this he says a careful study of the plants in their native surroundings is necessary. In some general notes on cork formation in thorns of different plants, several ex- planations of other authors are given. In conclusion, the author | oS 132 gives a list of plants whose thorns have basal cork formation. This list is taken in part from Gamble’s manual of Indian timbers and, in part, from specimens found in museums and botanical gardens. Bids oe Crossing of Cucurbits, L. H. Pammel (Bull. 19, lowa Exp. Station). Prof. Pammel records the results of a large number of tests in crossing pumpkin (Cucurbita Pepo), squash (C. maxima), water- melon (Citrellus vulgaris), musk melons (Cucumis Melo), and cu- cumbers (Cucumis sativus). While there was great variability in some species as in the pumpkins and squashes, this was due to the seed used and not an immediate effect of crossing. The result of the cross is seen only in the offspring, not in the fruit. B.D. 31 Cypripedium fasciculatum, var. pusillum. (Bot. Mag. t. 7275). Dr. Hooker refers C. pusillum Rolfe, Kew. Bull., 1892, 211, to this species. Distribution of Tropical Ferns in Peninsular Florida. Lucien M. Underwood. (Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci. 1891, 83-89). Ecloge Botanica, No. z. Edward L. Greene. (Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. 1892, 357-365 ; issued Feb. 6, 1893). This contribution of Prof. Greene is devoted to (1) New or Noteworthy Thistles, in which the conclusion is expressed that all our species should be included in the Linnzan genus Carduus, the name Cyicus being applicable only to Centaurea benedicta. Most of the Eastern species have already been named under Carduus ; the others are here transferred and ten new ones characterized, which will much facilitate the naming of undetermined material ; (2) Three new Perennial Lupines: Lupinus floribundus from Colo- rado, L. gracilentus and L. Covillei from California. Nid Bs Economic Fungi—Fascicle V. Profs. Seymour and Earle. This contribution, embracing numbers 201 to 250, includes thirteen families of plants among the hosts, two of which, the Rosacea and Conifere are largely represented, the former containing the eecidial and the latter teleutosporic forms of several species of Gymnosporangium. The mycologist will be particularly interested in the specimens of G. Bermudianum (Farl.) Earle, which strangely , has both the zcidial and teleutospore form upon the same galls 133 of the jimpson as found by Mr. Earle in Mississippi. Professor Galloway’s new species, Coleosporium Pini is included and many other interesting Uredinez. ‘i Ae Bae 5 Epidendrum spondianum (Bot. Mag. t. 7,273). Native of Jamaica and Costa Rica. Lpigea repens (Mechan’s Month. iii. 17, 18; colored plate). flora of Mt. Orizaba. Henry E. Seaton. (Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci. 1891, 80-92). Gases in Living Plants. J. C. Arthur. (Amer. Nat. xxvii. 1-8; 98-105). Glumifioren des nordlichen Ohio. "do. Classen. (Pharm. Rundsch. X1. 33-34). A list of 70 Cyperaceze and 78 Graminez from the northern counties of Ohio. Grasses of Pennsylvania—List of the. Thos. C. Porter. (Leaflet, PP: 4). : | . A list of 166 species and varieties accompanying the exhibi- tion of the specimens of Pennsylvania Grasses, prepared by Eros, Porter for the State Agricultural Societies exhibit at the Columbian Exposition. Griselinia—Revision der Gattung. P.Taubert. (Engl. Bot. Jahr. XVi. 386-392). Description of seven species of this New Zealand and South American genus of Myrtacee. We are interested in observing that Dr. Taubert adopts the parenthetical citation of previous authors. Hardwoods of Onda ae Francis E. Lloyd. (Hardwood, iii. 10-11). Notes on fourteen species. Lathyrus sylvestris, A New Fodder Plant. (Bull. 2, Va. Exp. Sta- tion.) The whole bulletin is given to the merits of this plant for fodder. Malvaceen—Beitragé sur Systematik der. M ax Giirke (Engler’s Bot. Jahrb. xvi. 330-385). A new treatment of the genera JMadachra and wi Se 134 Morphological Notes. S. B. Parish (Erythea, i, 45-47; E. L. Greene, |. c. 52). Description of lateral flowering in Agave Americana, and re- marks on the nature of the petiolar glands in Armeniaca vulgaris, which, it is suggested, represent the petiolules of reduced leaflets. Nematophycus Storriei, nov. sp. C. A. Barber (Ann. Bot. vi.. 329- 338, Pl. XIX. XX). The plant originally described by Dawson as Prototaxites, from the Devonian rocks of Canada, and afterwards studied and re- named by Carruthers as Mematophycus, on account of its evident algal affinities, were made the subject of close microscopic exami- nation by the author, in connection with specimens of Pachytheca. Asa matter of interest it may be here noted that these genera, and Chara, are almost the only fossil algze in which well defined structure is apparent, and the first two were long suspected to be merely parts of the same plants. The specimens of Wematophycus upon which the new species is founded, were obtained from the Tymawr quarry at Cardiff, Wales, in rocks ofthe Wenlock (Upper Silurian)* age, associated with remains previously indentified as Pachytheca. In addition to the full description of the new species a descrip- tion is given, for the purposes of comparison, of V. Logani (Daw.) Carruthers, and in the plates both species are made the subjects of numerous studies in longitudinal and transverse sections. Ys cia © Occurrence of Certain Western Plants at Columbus, Ohio. Aug. D. Selby (Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci. 1891, 74-76). Ornamental and Timber Trees. (Bul. 24, Minn. Exp. Station). This is a large work designed to encourage the growing of de- sirable plants adapted to the northern conditions. Full lists,in the notes for each sort, are given for deciduous trees, evergreen trees, shrubs, vines and climbing plants, herbaceous plants followed by tables of hardiness. Paleobotany of the Cretaceous Formation on Staten Island— Additions to the. Arthur Hollick. (Reprint, Trans. N. Y. Acad. Sci. xii. 1-12, Pl. I-IV.) In this contribution the author supple- ments a previous contribution on the palzontology of the same region, but here giving special attention to the fossil plants. Alist 135 of some forty species is given, in which, excluding seeds and fruits of uncertain affinities, there are seven new species described, viz: Myrica Davisi, M. grandifolia, Platanus Aquehongensis, Kalmia Brittoniana, Acer minutus, Wailliamsonia (7) Rtesw, and Phyllites poinsettioides. All species enumerated are figured in the accompanying plates, and many of them are recognized as identi- cal with the species described and figured by Prof. Heer from the Atane and Patoot beds of Greenland, by Prof. Leo Lesquereux from the Cretaceous of the Western United States, and by Ettingshausen and Velenoosky in Europe. Another important link in the chain of vegetation during Cretaceous times is thus established. Pammel’s Fungus of Texas Root-rot of Cotton—Method of ob- taining pure cultures of. Geo.-F. Atkinson (Bot. Gaz. xviii. 16-19). Plant Dispersion by the Buffalo. (Erythea, i. 47, 48). An anonymous letter is published, its author agreeing with the criticisms of Professor Green on a recent article on this subject. Plante Lehmanniane in Guatemala, Costa Rica, Columbia, Ecuador etc., collecte—Leguminose, Marc Micheli. (Kngl. Bot. Jahrb. xvi, Heft. 3, Beiblatt, 1-9.) An annotated list of a large number of species, all previously described. Portulacee—A Rearrangement of American. Thomas Howell (Erythea, i. 29-41). This valuable paper is in the nature of a synoptical revision of the American species of the order. Its principal feature is the proposal of a new genus, Ovcobroma, including 10 species taken out of Lewisia, Claytonia,Talinum and Calandrinia, all acaulescent perennials with scapose stems jointed at the base and fleshy, edi- ble roots. Mr. Howell also refers a considerable number of the West Coast plants which have hitherto been in Claytoma to Monta, agreeing in this with the views recently expressed by Prof. Greene. Calyptridium nudum, Greene, is referred to Spraguea, and Spraguea multiceps is a new species. N. L. B. Prolification und Phyllodie bei Geum rival. E. Busherer (Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Gesell. x. 571-576; one plate). 136 Ranunculacee—A Comparative Study of the Roots of. Fred. B. Maxwell. (Bot. Gaz. xviii. 8-16; 41-47. Three plates). Rio de La Plata; Its Basin, Geography and Inhabitants. Thomas Morong. (Bull. Amer. Geograph. Soc. xxiv. 479-509). Delivered originally as a lecture before the American Geo- graphical Society, and now printed as an article in its Bulletin, accompanied by a map of the region traversed. This is a run- - ning account of a trip made by the author up the rivers Plata, Parana and Paraguay in the year 1888, and a sojourn for the two following years at Asuncion, the capital of Paraguay. Brief de- scriptions are given of Montevideo, Buenos Aires and Asuncion, the manners of their inhabitants, the character of the pampas and campos, and the characteristics of the rivers and the vegetation upon their banks, ending with a short account of the wild tribes of Indians inhabiting the wilderness of the Gran Chaco in Paraguay. Root-Pressure—An Apparatus for Determining the Periodicity of. M. B. Thomas (Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci. 1891, 82, 83). Root Rotwf Alfalfa. (Bull. 22 Texas Exp. Station). A new and serious trouble of fungous origin not yet well known on Medicago sativa. Vacation in the Hawauan Islands. D.H. Campbell. (Bot. Gaz. XVii. 410-416; xviii. 19-25). Viole Chilenses—Ein Beitrag zur Systematik der Gatting Viola. Karl Reiche. (Engl. Bot. Jahrb. xvi. 403-448). A descriptive list of 46 species of Chilian Violets, several of which are new. BULLETIN OF THE TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB.—PLATE CXLII. HEMITONES CONGESTA, A. GRAY. NEWBERRYA CONGESTA, TORR. BULLETIN OF THE TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB.—PLATE CXLIITI, ' DITRICHUM MONTANUM, LEIBERG. BULLETIN OF THE TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB.—PLATE CXLIV. SIRI Ee (ay # i joe Py 0.0, SaHs GRIMMIA PACHYPHYLLA, LEIBERG. _ BULLETIN OF THE TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB.—PLATE CXLV. HIERACIUM GREENII, PORTER AND BRITTON. NEW YORK FUNGI. The First Century is now ready for distribution, and others will follow as soon as prepared. It is intended to make these sets as complete as possible in Hymenomy- cetes. Prof. Chas. H. Peck has kindly promised to examine all species of which he is the author. It is hoped that the science of Mycology may be rendered some service by making accessible authentic specimens, and thus helping to avoid the multiplica- tion of synonyms. Price for the First Century, bound, $7.00; unbound, $6.00. For- eign subscriptions 25 cents extra for postage. Those desiring to subscribe or seeking further information, please address C. L. SHEAR, Alcove, N. Y, CHARACEZ OF AMERICA. The first fascicle of the Second Part of the Characeze of America is now ready. It contains descriptions of eight species of WVitel/a, as fol- lows: WVitella opaca, Ag.; obtusa, Allen; montana, Allen; Blankin- shipit, Allen; Missouriensis, Allen; fiexilis, Ag.; subglomerata, A. Br. ; glomerulifera, A. Br., with fourteen full-page illustrations (eight litho- graphic plates and six photogravures). These fascicles will be issued from time to time as plates can be prepared ; price of each part $1, the actual cost, if the whole edition of 500 copies be sold. Address Se we = edad EN 10 East 36th St., N. Y. ~The North American Pyrenomycetes. By J. B. ELLIS and B. M. EVERHART. With original illustrations by F. W. ANDERSON. 2,500 species of the old genus ** Sphveria,” described and arranged in accordance with the modern ideas of classification. One thick octavo volume, with over 800 pages of printed matter and 41 full-page tinted plates illustrating the genera; bound in fine cloth, with stamped covers and gilt-lettered back. Price, $8,00, with 35 cts. additional if sent by mail. Address, J. B. ELLIS, Newfield, N. J. Sets of Potamogeton. A few sets of Potamogeton are in the course of preparation which are offered for sale to botanists who are in want of authen- tic species named by the subscriber. The sets will include nearly all the North American and many European species, together with a few species of Naias. The price will range from $3.00 to $5.00, according to their completeness. THOMAS MORONG. Columbia College, New York City. F. W. DEVOE & CO. ESTABLISHED 1852. OFFICES, CORNER FULTON AND WILLIAM STREETS, New York. “ARTISTS - PATERIALS. Sketching Outfits of All Kinds. Tube Colors, Water Colors, Crayons, Drawing Paper. Canvas, Brushes, Oils and Mediums. Mathematical Instruments, House Painters’ Colors. Fresco Colors. Fine Varnishes. CORRESPONDENCE INVITED CATALOGUES OF OUR DIFFERENT DEPARTMENTS TO RESPONSIBLE PARTIES. COFFIN, DEVOE & CO,, 176 RANDOLPH ST. CHICAGO. ean WILLIAM WALES, Fort Lee, N. J. MANUFACTURER OF FIRST-CLASS MICROSCOPE OBJECTIVES. MICROSCOPES FURNISHED OF ALL MAKES—ZENTMAYER’S AL- WAYS ON HAND. INSTRUMENTS ORDERED IN NEW YORK CITY SENT ON APPROVAL. DISCOUNT TO COLLEGES. ESTABLISHED 1851. - EIMER & AMEND, Chemicals and Chemical Apparatus, 205, 207, 209 & arr Third Ave., Corner of 18th Street, NEW YORK. SOLE AGENTS FOR THE UNITED STATES OF NORTH AMERICA, FOR : E. March’s Szline Chemical Stone — Ware. aes pe eke Schleicher & Schuell’s Chemically Pure and Common Filter Paper. Doctor c. Scheibler’ $ Saccharome- ee ters (Polariscopes). See te _| Prof. Jolly’s Specific Gents Bale ances, etc. AEE Le Brun F. Heuhonthe & er a, Paris, Platinum. ware, Povtas from the Raval Berlin ak Hicioeck Facroties, 3 oh ian and German een: ae ict ae Moray, P : | ~ PUBLICATIONS OF THE CLUB. (1) THE BULLETIN. This journal has been published consecutively since 1870, beginning with four pages monthly, gradually increasing, until in 1892 over 32 pages monthly with many full page illustrations were issued. The subscription price is $2 per annum. Terms for England and the Continent of Europe, 10 shillings. Agents for England, Messrs, DuLau & Co., 37 Sohu Square, London, England. _ Back Numpers.—The Buttetin was published from 1870 to 1875, inclusive, in yearly volumes, and was indexed at the end of the five years. The price of these five volumes is $5.00. The numbers from 1875 to 1879, inclusive, were allowed to — a Yun on as one volume (Vol. VI.), and were indexed at the end of the five years. The price of this volume is $5.00, Volumes VII. to XVII. have been indexed separately, and a general index to them printed in pamphlet form, which may be had for 50 cents. The price of each is $1.00. Vols. XVIII. and XIX. are indexed _ Separately. Price, $2.00. Vol. VIII. cannot now be supplied complete, but it is planned to reprint some of its numbers. or @ THE MEMOIRS. : 5 The subscription price is fixed at $3.00 per volume in advance, The mpatbey See 3 WAAR rad kc Atlan ad i arc Magn cenaheres soe _ Volume I contains the following papers: : ee No. 1.—Studies of the Types of various Species of the Genus Cores, by P Prof S __L.H. Bailey. This cannot now be had separately. No. 2.—A List of the Marine Alge hitherto observed on the Coasts of New Jersey and Staten Island, by Isaac C. Martindale. Price, s0 Cents. °F 7s ___No. 3—An Enumeration of the Hepatice collected by Dr. H. H. Rasiy a “inl > South supa’ ios with mapa ara of lama! new iain bic Dr. Richard. ee Price, 75 cents. ree No. 4—On Seedless Fruits, by Dr. E. Lewis Sturtevant. | Price, ses cents. Volume II contains the following papers: . No. 1.—On vata Food Materials i io Buds pen Srosnting Pars with » 9 en ee APRIL, 1898. oo BULLEN roe OF THE. ROR Sa et Rookie: of ee Plants Collected _ Dr. H. H. Rusby in South America, 1886: NV. L. Britton THE TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB. OFFICERS FOR 1893. President, HON. ADDISON BROWN. ae . _~“Vice Presidents, ; Pee rE ALLEN, MD. =: THOMAS MORONG, Ph. De Be | Recording Ricketorgi3 : = cre rae | Corresponding Secretary, _ HENRY H, RUSBY, M. D,, | Pao oo a JORNY KR SMALL. 7 College of Pharmacy, New. York Gye Oe Columbia College, New York City. Editor, Sakae : op - hepa ‘Treasurer, _ L. BRITTON, Ph. ee Oe So 2 BEMRY OGDEN, ; Be ce Bs Pine Ser ‘New ‘York City. BULLETIN TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB. An Enumeration of the Plants Collected by Dr. H. H. Rusby in South America, 1885-1886,—X XIII, (Continued from Vol. XIX., page 374.) VACCINIACEA. Psammisia leucostoma, Benth.; Meisn. in Mart, Fl. Bras. vii. 127. Mapiri, 2,500 ft. (2038). The same as Spruce, No. 2465 from Brazil. Psammisia paucifiora, Griseb. in Pl. Lechl. Exc. 2386. Mapiri, 5,000 ft. (2037). The same as Lechler, 2386 from Peru. This may be a Macleania as indicated by Bentham and Hooker, Gen, Ply it. S67. EURYGANIA ELLIPTICA (R. & P.) (Thibaudia elliptica, R. & P. Fi. Per. iv. t. 384, f. B). Mapiri, 2,500 ft. (2219); Yungas, 4,000 ft. (2034). CERATOSTEMMA Hooker, Britton. (Zhibaudia elliptica, Hook. Icon. Pl. t. 108, not R. & P.). Mapiri, 10,000 ft. (2036). CERATOSTEMMA MANDONI, n. sp. Sect. Euceratostemma. Ramis glabris, striatis; foliis breviter petiolatis, integris, ovatis vel ovato-oblongis, approximatis, concoloribus, supra glabris, subter parce nigro-punctatis, utriusque obtusis, I-1.5 cm. longis, 5-8 mm. latis, 5-venosis; pedunculis, calycibusque to- mentosis; floribus terminalibus, solitariis geminibusve, 3 cm. longis; calyx 5-fidus, lobi lanceolati, acuti; corolla exttis puberulenta, cylindracea, apice 5-fida, calyce 4-5-plo longiora. 138 Mapiri, 10,000 ft. (2632). Same as Mandon’s 748, and prob- ably the same as Lechler’s 2693 and 2585 from Gatchapota, Peru, Herb. Kew. CERATOSTEMMA SERRATA, n. sp. Sect. Siphonandra. Ramulis rugosulis, glabris; foliis breviter petiolatis, ovato-oblongis, utrinque pallidis, subter parce nigro-punctatis, apice acutis, basi rotundatis, margine remote denticulatis, 5-8 cm. longis, 3-4 cm. latis; floribus axillaribus, umbellatis, 3-4 cm. longis; caly- cibus oblongo-campanulatis, breviter 5-dentatis; corollis glabris, cylindraceis, calyce 2-3-plo longioribus, apice 5-dentatis. _ -Unduavi, 8,000 ft. (2035). CAVENDISHIA PUBESCENS (H. B. K.) (Zhibaudia pubescens, H. B. K. Nov. Gen. ili. 273). Yungas, 6,000 ft. (2033). Cavendishia, sp. Mapiri, 5,000 ft. (2403). Vaccinium empetrifolium, H. B. K. Nov. Gen. iii. 263, t. 248 ? Unduavi, 10,000 ft. (2022). Vaccinium floribundum, 1. B. K.,1. c. 266, t. 251. Mapiri, 10,000 ft. (2028). The same as Mandon’s 551. Vaccinium didynanthum, Dun. in D.C. Prodr. vii. 575. Mapiri, 10,000 ft. (2026): Vaccinium epacridifolium, Benth. Pl. Hares 221. Mapiri, 10,000 ft. (2027). | Vaccinium polystachyum, Benth, |. c. 140. Mapiri, 10,000 ft. (2024). Vaccinium pernettioides, Griseb. in Lechler Pl. Excs. 2113a. Yun- gas, 6,000 ft. (2029). The same as Lechler’s 211 3a. Vaccinium, sp. Ingenio del Oro (2021). 3 Sophoclesia, sp. Mapiri, 5,000 ft. (2696). « Rusbya taxifolia, Britton, Bull. Torr. Bot. Club, xx. 68. Yanges, 4,000 ft. (2692). ERICACEE. Pernettya Pentlandu, D. C. Prodr. vii. 587. Sorata, 13,000 ft. (2017) Yungas, 6,000 ft. (2018.) Pernettya Pentlandu, D. C. var. parvifolia (Benth.) Wedd. Chlor. And. ii. 170. Unduavi, 8,000 ft. (2023). : Gaultheria anastomosans (L. f.) H. B. K. Nov. Gen. iii, 285. thier ek 6,000 ft. oe 2095). ‘ 139 Gaultheria cordifolia, H. B. K. Nov. Gen. iii. 285, t. 261. Yungas, 6,000 ft. (2016). Gaultheria brachybotrys, D. C. Prodr, vii. 595. Sorata, 13,000 ft. (2014). Gaultheria rufescens, D. C. Prodr. vii. 595. Unduavi, 8,000 ft. (2013); 10,000 ft. (201 1). The same as Mandon’s 557. Gaultheria reticulata, H. B. K. Nov. Gen. iii. 284. Ingenio del Oro, 10,000 ft. (2030). Gaultheria glabra, D. C. Prodr. vii. 596. Yungas, 6,000 ft. (2015). Gaultheria tomentosa, H. B. K. Nov. Gen. iii. 287, t. 262. Undu- avi, 8,000 ft. (2032). The same as Mandon’s 559. Gaultheria Pinchinchensis, Benth. Pl. Hartw. 225. Yungas, 6,000 ft. (2012). Gaultheria conferta, Benth. Pl. Hartw. 219. Unduavi, 10,000 ft. (2020). Gaultheria vaccinioides, Griseb. P|. Lechler Excs. 1900. Unduavi, 10,000 ft. (2019); Ingenio del Oro, 10,000 ft. (2031). Befaria glauca, H. & B. Pl. AZquin. ii. 118,t. 177. | Mapiri, 5,000 ft. (2010); Yungas, 6,000 ft. (2123). Clethra fimbriata, H. B. K. Nov. Gen. iii. 290, t. 264. Unduavi, 12,000 ft. (2073). The same as Mandon’s 562. é Clethra Brasiliensis, Cham. Linnea, viii. 510. Yungas, 6,000 ft. (2091). PLUMBAGINE. Plumbago scandens, L. Sp. Pl. Ed. 2, 215. Tacna, Chili (1158); Yungas, 6,000 ft. (1917 and 1073). MyrSINEz. Myrsine dependens (R. & P.) Spreng. Syst. i. 664. (J. ciliata, H, B. K.) Unduavi, 10,000 ft. (2491.) Myrsine erythroxyloides, Benth. Voy. Sulph. 123. Guanai, 2,000 ft. (867). Myrsine latifolia (R. & P.) Spreng. Syst. i. 664. Yungas, 4,000 ft. (868). : : 140 Myrsine Gardneriana, A.D. C. Ann. Sci. Nat. (II) xvi. 86. Yungas, 4,000 ft. (866 and 869). The same as Spruce’s No. 4251, GEISSANTHUS BOLivIANA, n. sp. Arbor glabra. Foliis oblanceolatis, coriaceis, integris, multinervis, subtus dilute viridis, apice ob- tusis, base cuneatis, 15-20 cm. longis, 5-8 cm. latis; petiolis. crassis, 2 cm. longis; floribus 2-3 mm. latis, dense paniculatis ; paniculis 10-15 cm. longis; calycibus campanulatis, punctatis, 5- lobatis, tubo lobis zequalibus ; corollis calyce duplo longioribus. Mapiri, 5,000 ft. (562). Related to Spruce’s No. 5176, Herb. Kew. Cybianthus, sp. Mapiri, 5,000 ft. (2346). Collected only in fruit. Cybrianthus, sp. Guanai, 2,000 ft. (1218). Collected only in fruit. I did not match either of these at Kew. In all probability they are undescribed species. Ardisia acuminata, Willd. Sp. Pl. i. 1062. Junction of the Rivers. Beni and Madre de Dios (2490). Clavyja spathulata, R. &. P. Syst. Fl. Per. i. 285 (?). Junction of Rivers Beni and Madre de Dios (2650). Clavija lancifolia, Desf. Nouv. Ann. Mus. Hist. Nat. i. 402, t. 14- Guanai, 2,000 ft. (1219). SAPOTACEA. Mimusops Surinamensis, Mig. in Mart. F]. Bras. vii. 43. Junction of the Rivers Beni and Madre de Dios (729). Lucuma procera, Mart.; A. D. C. Prodr. viii. 170. Falls of the Madeira, Brazil (2618). Sideroxylon, sp. Junction of the Rivers Beni and Madre de Dios (2703). | STYRACE. Styrax ovatum (R. & P.) A. D. C. Prodr. viii. 267. Yan 6,000 ft. (838). Symplocos Matthewsti, A. D. C. Prodr. viii. 250. Mapiri, 5,000 ft. (2686). Symplocos, sp. Mapiri, 2,500 ft. (2685). OLEACE. Jasminum grandiflorum, L. Sp. Pl. Ed. 2,9. Yungas, 6,000 ft. (1244). Cultivated and escaped. 141 The Development of the Sporocarp of Pilularia Americana, A. Br. By DoucLas HoucGHTon CAMPBELL. (PLATE CXLVL) Pilularia Americana is by no means uncommon in California, and is said to be especially abundant in the Sacramento Valley. Last spring a quantity of fresh specimens, collected near Suisun, were sent me by Mrs. Brandegee, and as they bore numerous sporocarps, in all stages of develoyment, it seemed a good oppor- tunity to attempt to clear up some obscure points in the early de- velopment of the sporocarps of the Marsiliacez. Without microtome sections, it is quite impossible to study the earliest stages satisfactorily on account of their small size, and because they are completely buried in a mass of hairs that cover the growing point of the stem, and all of the younger parts in its vicinity. Those hairs cannot be removed from the young sporo- carp and interfere very seriously with a clear view of it. Our knowledge of the development of the sporocarp of Pilu- Jaria is based mainly upon the work of Sachs,* Goebel,t and Ju- ranyi,t and that of Marsilia upon Russow’s investigations.§ The origin of the sporocarp itself, however, and the formation of the cavities in which the sporangia are borne, was not clearly under- stood. By imbedding in paraffine in the usual way and sectioning with a microtome, no trouble was experienced in getting a com- plete series of preparations that showed all the details, and the re- sults of a study of these is here given. In preparing the speci- mens for sectioning, the growing tips of the fruiting plants were treated for two or three hours with a I per cent. aqueous solution of chromic acid, washed, stained 7” /ofo with alum cochineal, and after sectioning, stained on the slide with alcoholic Bismarck- brown; my usual method of preparing sections of young tissues. * Sachs, Text-Book of Botany, 2 ed., pp. 455-460. + Goebel, « Outlines,” p. 240, foot note. _ tJuranyi. The original paper in Hungarian. Reported in Just’s Jahresbericht, Jahrgang 1879, p. 416. §Russow. Histologie und Entwickelungsgeschichte der Sporenfrucht von Mar- | ilia. Dorpat, 1871. 142 The creeping stem of Pilularia grows from a single tetrahe- dral apical cell, from which three series of segments are cut off, as in most ferns. Two of these series give rise to the two rows of leaves, and from the third, roots only are formed. The stem branches freely, the branches arising close behind its apex. Leaves of two kinds are formed, fertile and sterile; the former differ from the latter simply in bearing a sporocarp. The foliar na- ture of the sporocarp has been inferred from analogy with the ferns, and also from a study of the position of the older sporocarps but the way in which it originates from the leaf was not known. Juranyi* states that in P. globulifera, the formation of the fruit be- gins, only after the leaf has reached a considerable size. My own observations on P. Americana do not confirm this. On the con- trary, the yonng fruit begins to develop almost as soon as the leaf can be recognized, and while it is still close to the apex of the stem, long before it is large enough to be seen with the naked eye. The young leaf, like the stem, grows from a tetrahedral apical cell. Growth at first is stronger upon the outer side, and in con- * sequence, even at a very early stage, the leaf is strongly coiled, as in all the homosporous Leptosporangiates. In the fertile leaves, however, before this curvature has become very pro- nounced, a protuberance may be noticed upon its inner face, not far above the base. (Fig. 1, M.) This originates from the growth of a single cell (x), which acts as an apical cell in the same way as that of the apex of the body of the leaf. This protuberance is the young sporocarp which at this stage is clearly seen to be simply a segment or branch of the fertile leaf. The young sporocarp enlarges rapidly after its formation and assumes the form of a blunt cone. Next, on the side turned to- ward the sterile segment of the leaf which bears it, a slight promi- -nence is noticed (Fig. 2, F.), and about the same time two similar lateral prominences are formed. As in the sterile segment growth is stronger on one side (here the side turned away from the sterile segment), and in consequence the sporocarp bends over toward the sterile segment of the leaf. The apex of the young sporocarp (Fig. 2, F.), together with the three prominences referred to, en- close a slightly depressed area which is top of the young sporo- #1... ¢, 143 carp. The four prominences (including the original apex of the fertile segment), are beyond doubt to be regarded as leaflets, which, however, are never much elevated above the surface of the young fruit, and in this first stage form four slightly elevated ridges. A little later (Fig. 3), these become more prominent, and a slight depression or pit is formed between the base of each and the cells occupying the top of the young sporocarp. These pits are separated laterally by the coherent margins of the leaflets which extend to the axis of the sporocarp and are continuous with it. The young fruit now enlarges rapidly, and as it does so the depressions deepen owing to the elongation of the leaflets, and also to that of the cells of the axis of the sporocarp, which form a sort of columella running through the center. The leaflets, or as we will now call them, lobes, are only free at their tips; and as the edges are in contact from the first and extend to the axis, the clefts between them and the axis form four ‘deep cavities that open by as many pores at points opposite the tips of the lobes. These pits correspond to the ‘ canals” de- scribed by Russow in the fruit of Marsilia. Juranyi states that these cavities are caused by a splitting apart of the cells of the inner tissue of the sporocarp, and that the communication with the outside is brought about by the sub- sequent separation of the cells at the apex of the sporocarp; that is, that the cavities are endogenous in origin. Doubt has been expressed as to the accuracy of these statements, and Goebel States that his observations do not bear them out. A study of longitudinal sections of the young sporocarp show beyond doubt the strictly external origin of these cavities. Up to the time that the cavities begin to form, the young fruit is composed of a uniform, small-celled parenchyma, but a little — later, however, the primary tissue systems are differentiated, and the separation of the body of the sporocarp from its peduncle becomes evident. About the same time the axial cells in the basal part of the sporocarp extending into the peduncle, elongate and form the beginning of the single fibro-vascular bundle that traverses the peduncle and joins that of the sterile ae of the leaf near its base. 144 The peduncle grows rapidly and becomes several times longer than the sporocarp itself—(Fig 5). The growth upon the upper side of the latter is stronger than upon the lower side, and in con- sequnce, it becomes bent over, nearly or quite at right angles to the peduncle. With the enlargement of the sporocarp the cavi-: ties within become deeper and wider in a direction parallel to the broad surfaces of the lobes; but the radial growth of these keeps pace with the longitudinal growth, so that the space between the inner surface of the lobe and the columella, is very narrow. The growth is especially active in the inner epidermal cells, which pro- ject more or less and form a cushion running vertically along the median line of each lobe. This cushion is the sorus (Fig. 5.6.8. ), and as its surface cells develop into the sporangia, it nearly fills the cavity in which it lies. A tranverse section at this time shows that the portions separating the cavities are composed of about four layers of cells. The fibro-vascular bundle which traverses the center of the pe- duncle divides into four branches at the base of the sporocarp, and — one of these goes to each lobe and forms a sort of midrib (Fig. 6.). Later each of these bundles sends off two lateral branches that follow the margins of the lobe. A cross section of a sporo- carp at this stage (see Fig. 9), shows these as groups of small cells at nearly equal distances from each other, one at the center of the lobe, the others close to its margin. By this time the epidermal cells of the outside of the sporocarp begin to thicken. This is the first indication of the hard shell found in the ripe fruit. While these changes are going on in the outer tissues of the sporocarp, the sporangia have begun to develop from the surface cells of the sori. -Active growth begins in these cells, which be- come elevated as papillze above the surface of the sorus. This is most marked in the basal or older cells, but proceeds rapidly to- ward the upper end of the sorus. While in a general way we may say that the sporangia arise in acropetal succession, still new ones arise later among the earlier formed ones, without refer- ence to their position; indeed all of the surface cells of the sori may be regarded as potentially, at least, sporangium mother-cells. There is a good deal of variation in Pi/u/aria, as in many ferns, as to the direction of the first division walls in the young sporan- : s 145 gium, and it seems to me that too much stress has been laid upon this by some writers. In the earlier sporangia the first division walls are usually strongly oblique, but even here the first wall may be transverse (see Fig. 7, a.), as usually happens in the Polypodiaceze. Several oblique walls now arise which meet each other in such a way that the terminal cell has much the form of an ordinary tetrahedral apical cell. Soon, however, a wall is formed parallel to the outer wall of the terminal cell, and thus an inner cell (Fig. 7 Ga); male archesporium, is cut off. The archesporium is formed relatively earlier in the first formed sporangia which are almost sessile, while in the later ones, where they are more crowded, the pedi- cel is much better developed (Fig. 10). From the archesporium the tapetal cells (t.), are cut off in the usual way, and subsequently these divide by both radial and tan- gential walls into a large number of cells. For the most part there is but one set of tangential divisions, but sometimes there is a second one in some of the cells, so that at these points the tapetum is three cells thick. The central cell divides by an oblique wall into two cells and these each divide twice more, and sometimes some or all of the resulting cells may divide again, so that the whole number of the resulting spore mother-cells ranges from eight to sixteen. When the full number is complete the cells separate owing to the partial disintegration of the division walls, and, at the same time, the walls of the tapetal cells become completely absorbed and their contents form a mass of protoplasm in which the sepa- rated spore mother-cells are imbedded. These now increase somewhat in size and become globular as the pressure of the sur- rounding cells is removed. The sporangium has now increased a good deal in size and the spore mother-cells do not completely fill it. . In fresh sporangia the tapetal-cells appear completely disor- _ ganized, but when stained sections are examined it is evident enough that the protoplasm and nuclei of the cells persist un- changed, and the further development shows that the protoplasm and nuclei of the tapetum probably play an important part in ya further growth of the spores. - ee ree 146 The division of each of the spore mother-cells into four shows nothing peculiar. The nucleus divides twice before any division of the protoplasm takes place, and the four daughter-nuclei ar- range themselves at equal distances from each other near the peri- phery of the cell, after which division walls are formed simultane- ously between them, and the resulting spores are of the tetra- hedral type. Up to this point the sporangia are all alike, but now a differ- ence is noticed between those in the lower and those in the upper part of the sporocarp. The former develops into macrosporangia, the latter into microsporangia. In the latter all of the young spores come to maturity, but in the former one spore very early begins to grow faster than the others, which finally shrivel up and develop no further. The young macrospore is at first nearly globular, but soon becomes oval, and finally completely fills the sporangium. In its early stages the membrane is thin, but as it grows it becomes very thick. A slight examination shows that the spore is surrounded by a layer of protoplasm, in which are im- bedded a great many nuclei. This protoplasm is no doubt that derived from the tapetum, and its position indicates that it, with its included nuclei, is actively concerned in the nourishment of the growing macrospore. This office is probably two-fold; first to pro- vide material or the growth of the spore contents, and secondly to deposit upon the outside of the spore the material for the formation of the peculiar and highly specialized spore coat, characteristic of the Marsiliaceze. The development of the spore membrane seems to be the same in the microspores, but owing to their smaller size ‘is not so easy to trace out. The wall of the sporangium remains. but one cell thick, and shows no traces of the annulus found in all the terrestrial leptosporangiate ferns. This complete disappearance is in allprobability to be traced to a loss of function. In the ter- restrial ferns, the opening of the sporangium is brought about by drying up, and the contraction of the annulus by drying is the principal factor in the process. In the Marsiliacez, on the con- trary, the sporangium only opens when its walls are dissolved by the action of water. Possibly further search will show some trace of an annulus in the earlier stages of the sporangium, but I could discover none, either in the young or ripe sporangia. 147 As the sporocarp ripens the outer cells become very hard, es- pecially the first layer of hypodermal cells (Fig. 12, b.), whose walls become finally so much thickened that the cell cavities are almost completely obliterated. The second hypodermal layer also has its walls more or less thickened, but not nearly to the Same extent. The ripe sporocarp is about 3 mm. in diameter, and the pe- duncle about as long and bent downward, so that the sporocarp is partially or completely buried in the earth. When perfectly ripe it splits into four valves corresponding to the lobes or ‘leaflets of which it is made up. This splitting follows the median line of the partitions in the sporocarp. A comparison of the foregoing statements with the corres- ponding points in the development of Jarsilia, so far as the latter is known, show, as might be expected, close resemblances. There seems no doubt that the sporocarp is simply a portion of a leaf, bearing much the same relation to the sterile part that the fertile pinne of Ophioglossum or Osmunda for example, do the sterile part of the leaf. We may perhaps more aptly compare it to such a fern as Onoclea, which is really more nearly related. The struc- ture of one of the spore-bearing leaf segments of O. senstbilts for instance, is very similar, indeed, to the sporocarp of Pilularia, ex- cept that the sporangia are borne upon the lower and not upon the upper side of the leaf. As the Marsiliacez are in all probabil- ity descendants of forms related to the Polypodiacez, the origin of these peculiar points is probably to be looked for in forms hav- ing fertile leaves of a type similar to Onoclca. On comparing Pilularia Americana with P. globulifera, of Eu- rope, less difference was found than is generally supposed.* Ex- cept the longer peduncle of the fruit of the former and a slightly diminished development of the wall of the macrospore, I could see no difference. In size my specimens were little, if any, inferior to specimens of P. globulifera studied by me in Europe, either as re- gards the leaves or the sporocarp; and, almost without exception, the sporocarp was four-chambered as in that species, instead of three-chambered as described in the text-books. The absence of | * Goebel, L. et 240. ndeewend, «Qur Native Ferns and Their Allies,” 3d. a a ed., pp. 126-127, Watson, “ Botany of California,” Vol. i ii, Pp» 352: 148 a well marked constriction in the macrospore is due simply to a slightly diminished development of the outer layers of the spore-wall in the upper part of the spore, and a trace of this can always be found in the older spores. At any rate the two species must be regarded as very closely related. Explanation of Plate CXLVI. The magnification is indicated before each figure. Fig. 1. The base of a very young fertile leaf of Pilularia Americana, showing the beginning of the sporocarp, m. its apical cell. Fig. 2. Longitudinal section of an older sporocarp—F. F. two of t' e young lobes. Fig. 3. A similar section of a somewhat older sporocarp. Fig. 4. A still older sporocarp, in which the cavities are well developed. Fig. 5. Longitudinal section of on older sporocarp, including the peduncle. S. S. sori; H. hairs; fb. fibro-vascular bundle of the peduncle. Fig. 6. Longitudinal section of about the same age as in Fig. 5, but at right an- gles to the peduncle. Fig. 7. Longitudinal section of the young sorus, a. b. c. young sporangia. Fig. 8. Transverse section of an older sporocarp, showing the four cavities. Fig. 9. A single cavity from a somewhat younger one. Figs. 10, 11, Young sporangia, t. the tapetum. Fig. 12. Part of the wall of a nearly full grown sporocarp, a. b. c. the outer thick-walled cells. Free Nitrogen Assimilation by Plants. By H. W. Conn. The study of bacteriology has introduced to us an entirely new realm of knowledge. Twenty-five years ago the scientific world had little conception of the great change that was to be made in our knowledge of the processes of nature by the development of the study of micro-organisms. That bacteria were the cause of cer- tain diseases was even then strongly believed by many and had been definitely proved in a few cases. But that micro-organisms, in general, lay at the foundation of many of the most important physiological processes of nature was not even dreamed of. The dif- ficulty of research in this line made it possible for only a very 149 few to accomplish anything. About ten years ago Robert Koch invented a method of obtaining pure cultures which has placed this line of investigation within the reach of all.. The simplifica- tion of the methods of obtaining pure cultures has produced an immense stimulus in this branch of study and has turned hundreds. of observers towards investigation in this direction. The study of the last ten years has been modifying our ideas with marvelous rapidity. That bacteria produce disease is demonstrated beyond question, but we are beginning to realize that this is only a small part of the purposes they fulfill, We are learning that it is to the action of these organisms that many of the normal processes in nature are due, and that it is to their agency that the growth of plant life of the higher orders is largely indebted. One of the most recent and most surprising discoveries has been the relation of bacteria to the process of nitrogen assimilation. It is well known to all botanists that nitrogen is an absolutely necessary food for plants and animals. It is known further that the animal kingdom obtains all of its nitrogen from plants, and that plants obtain their nitrogen from the soil in the form of cer- tain salts, the chief of which are nitrates. Now, it is an undoubted fact, that the nitrogen factor of the soil upon which plants can de- pend, is little by little becoming exhausted through various agen- cies. In the first place, all of the nitrogenous parts of plants which are used by man as food, find their way eventually into the sewage, thence to the river, and finally to the ocean; and once reaching the ocean, the nitrogen is lost, so far as the terrestrial vegetation is concerned. Moreover, it has been shown that the various processes of putrefaction are slowly turning the complex nitrogen compounds into simpler ones, and eventually eliminating the nitrogen into the air in a free form. Inasmuch as all organic compounds, animal and vegetable alike, are subject to these putre- factive agencies, it is evident that a large amount of the nitrogen factor of the soil must, in this way, pass out into the air as free nitrogen. The extent of this loss is unknown, but it is doubtless. considerable. Plainly, unless there is some way of getting the nitrogen back from the air to the soil again, the soil is doomed to exhaustion. But it has seemed to be the result of many experi- ments that plants in their ordinary vegetation are capable of ob- 150 taining nitrogen from the soil alone, and are unable to use the free nitrogen of the atmosphere. Putting all of these facts together, it has seemed to science that the nitrogen store upon which plants can draw is being used up and must be sometime exhausted, thus putting an end to vegetation. Practically our agriculturists have for some time experienced the difficulties arising from this source. Many soils under long cultivation have become largely exhausted of their nitrogen sup- ply, and the farmer appreciates more and more the necessity of nitrogen fertilizers. These are now brought from long distances. The nitrate beds of Chili and the guano beds of the South Pacific are the chief stores from which this valued food is obtained. But even the nitrogen beds have their limits, and as the need for ni- trogen on our cultivated soils becomes greater through exhaus- tion, the price of nitrogen must become greater also. One writer has said that the explosion of powder in a gun does more injury than the bullet. The latter only kills a man, the former aids in in using up the nitrogen store which cannot be replaced and is a lasting injury to mankind. It is very plain from all of this that there is a great need for.some means of obtaining nitrogen for our soils besides the store of nitrates‘in our nitrate beds. Curi- ously enough, the bacteriologists are to-day pointing out the me- thod by which this problem can be solved. As mentioned above, it was the conclusion of many experi- ments that the higher plants cannot make use of free nitrogen from the air. Up to 1880 all experiments seemed to point to the same direction. At about that period, however, experiments with certain of the legumes began to show an increase in the ni- trogen in plants beyond that which was fed to them in their food. The experiments were at first rather indefinite and strongly denied, but as the decade from 1880 to 1890 passed they became more numerous and conclusive until, finally, it was a definitely estab- lished fact that many of the legumes can in some way obtain ni- trogen from some source besides the soil. In 1888 Hellriegel and Wilfarth, in a series of careful experiments upon the subject, studied the relation of this nitrogen assimilation to the production of tubercles upon the roots of plants. Pea plants and other le- gumes have been for a long time known to develop small nodules 151 on their roots, and experiments of Hellriegel and others showed a parallel between the development of these root tubercles and the power of obtaining nitrogen in large quantities. It was Hellriegel, also, who first demonstrated that these root tubercles were abnor- mal products on the roots of the pea, produced there by certain organisms in the soil. Hellriegel found, for instance, that peas growing in sterilized soil produced no tubercles and fixed no ni- trogen, while peas growing in a similar sterilized soil but watered with water in which ordinary soil had been standing for awhile (soil infusion), did develop tubercles and fixed nitrogen. The same soil infusion when sterilized was not able to cause the pro- duction of tubercles. From all of this it was evident that the tubercles were produced upon the roots of the peas through the agency of some of the organisms in the soil. A microscopic study of these root tubercles soon attested the same conclusion. It was found that the tuberacles were filled with small organisms related to bacteria, and that the development of the tubercles was parallel to the developement of these organisms. The organisms are somewhat different from normal bacteria and have been called bacteroids. According to the investigations of Prazmowski in 1890, the development and growth of the tubercles are as follows: Bacter- zum radiciola lives normally in the earth and collects in numbers on the outside of the roots of various legumes. Some of the or- ganisms succeed in forcing their way into the tissues of the young roots, though they are not able to pierce the older roots. Fora while they may remain in the root as free bacteria, but the plant plasma seems to exert an injurious influence upon them, for very soon a thin membrane is formed around the bacteria masses, in- closing them like a pouch, Prazmowski thinks that this mem- brane is a product of the bacteria themselves, formed for the pur- pose of protecting them from the injurious action of the plant tis- sue. The bacteria, which do not succeed in getting into one of these pouches, soon cease to grow and degenerate into irregular forms called bacteroids. The bulk of the bacteria, however, be- come inclosed in the membrane, after which they continue their growth with much vigor. The pouches begin to grow in thread- like masses, and these make their way among the cells of the root. 152 The thread branches more or less as it lengthens, and its various filiments grow through and between the cells, soon permeating the root with a fine, branching filament, which looks much like the mycelium of a mould. This bacteria pouch has been regarded as the hypha of some low fungus, but instead of being a mycelium growth of a mould the thread is nothing more than a large branch- ing colony of bacteria enclosed in a thin membrane. The growth of this colony of bacteria among the cells of the root stimulates these cells to an unusual growth. They multiply more rapidly than usual, and thus soon produce a swelling on the root which is the beginning of the tubercle. While this rapid multiplication of root cells is going on, the bacteria pouch contin- ues to grow and swells out into rounded vesicles within the cells which lie at the center of the forming tubercle, until most of them become filled with these expanded portions of the bacteria thread. Meantime the root cells of the plant have been rapidly growing, and form around the cells containing the bacteria, several layers of smaller cells, which develop into a hard, corky covering, forming a coat around the tubercle. This seems to be impervious to the bacteria thread, and confines the bacteria within its limits. The bacteria colony now undergoes a change. Although Prazmowski has not been able to follow the details of the process, it is thought that the vesicles in the central cells swell until the mem- brane covering the bacteria is so thin that it bursts, and the bac- teria are themselves extruded into the plasma of the root cells. At all events the vesicles disappear and there appears in their place what is called the bacteroid tissue. His interpretation is that the vesicles burst, and the bacteria coming into the cell plasma are im- - mediately checked in their growth by the injurious influence of this plasma and begin to undergo involution changes. In- stead of multiplying in the normal manner, they assume various. abnormal forms which have no further power of growth. They become, in short, the bacteroids which have been found by many observers, filling the central cells of the tubercle. The bacteria re- tain their power of growth only so long as they remain in the pro- tecting covering of the membrane. The tubercle by this time is pretty well formed. The outer cells have undergone quite an extended growth and differentiation, 153 so ‘that the tubercle is really a structure of a rather high grade of plant tissue. The tubercle itself is thus really a growth of the root cells of the plant and not a growth of bacteria. In the cen- ter of this mass of plant tissue are a large number of cells which are completely filled with the so-called bacteroids. These bac- teroids give to the tubercle at this stage a flesh-red color. Some of these central cells are so completely filled with them that nothing else can be seen, while others may still show the cell nu- cleus. In others spaces begin to appear in the body of the cell. The appearance of the spaces marks a new stage in the history of the tubercle and indicates that the bacteroids are beginning to be absorbed by the plant. The cell plasma soon assumes a network structure, and from this time the bacteroids entirely cease their activities and begin to disappear rapidly. After a little they are completely absorbed by the substance of the plant, and the tuber- cles are left as empty pouches. The tubercles have now changed their appearance again and assume a somewhat grayish green color. This practically ends the history of the tubercle. In most cases some of the bacteria seem to remain within their original membrane and, therefore, are still capable of growing. These may or may not set up a secondary growth, but it amounts to little, for by this time time the plant has usually blossomed, ripened its seeds, and the root is beginning to die. The tubercle is immediately attacked by the putrefactive bacteria in the soil and becomes decomposed. Since the work of Prazmowski other observers have studied the same problem. Pure cultures of the root organism have been obtained and used by artificial inoculation. Water cultures have been made where the process can be better studied. The general result has confirmed the idea above outlined, and proved conclu- sively that the tubercles are the result of the action of micro-or- ganisms in the soil. There has been more or less dispute in regard to the actual nature of these organisms. Fora time they were thought to be parts of the roots of the legumes, but this idea was soon aban- doned, and they were regarded as the hyphz of moulds. Later their relation to bacteria was rendered extremely probable, and 154 this is the generally accepted view to-day. The organisms do not act like ordinary bacteria, since they grow in a different way and have a somewhat different form. It is a matter of comparatively little importance, however, whether the organisms are regarded as true bacteria or simply as related organisms. The significant fact is that they are colorless microscopic organisms, living in the soil, belonging to the low fungi and having the remarkable functions above pointed out. The work of the last two years has shown further that there are a number of different species of these root organisms and that different species of legumes are associated with different species of these bacteroids. The organism which produces the root tu- bercles of the lupine will not produce the root tubercle of the pea, and, although the subject has not been as yet very thoroughly cleared up or studied very widely, it seems that nearly all of the different species of legumes are associated with different forms of organisms in the soil. It has followed from this that special soils are especially adapted for the growth of certain species of legumes. A soil for instance in which the lupine has been growing is much better adapted for the production of tubercles on lupine roots than it is for the production of tubercles on the roots of the pea, simply because the soil is already filled with the organisms which can grow in the lupine and not yet provided with that growing in the pea. It requires thus a culture of a year or two to develop in the soil a sufficient quantity of the appropriate species of bacteria to render the growth of any species of legume especially advan- tageous. The special work of bacteriologists at the present time is turned largely in the\direction of determining the facts in re- gard to this matter of bacteria species associated with the different species of legumes. It is plain from the above that the production of root tubercles is not a normal feature of the life of the pea plant, and that the bac- teria have some peculiar relation to the higher organism. It is, however, hardly proper to regard their relation as that of a parasite and its host. It is true that the bacteria grow in the root of the legume and doubtless obtain sustenance therefrom, but the higher organism does not suffer from the parasitism and the relation of: @ _the two organisms is rather that which is known as symbiosis,i.€2 155 relation in which each organism gains advantage. So far as the bacteria are concerned, they doubtless gain a place for developing a breeding pouch, and perhaps gain some sustenance from the root of the pea. So far as the pea plant is concerned, the presence of the organism makes possible the assimilation of free nitrogen. In all of the experiments which have been carried on it has been found that the production of the tubercles is necessary to enable the legumes to assimilate nitrogen. Where the legumes develop without tabercles on account of the lack of bacteria in the soil, no nitrogen was assimilated, and where the tubercles were very abund- ant, much nitrogen was taken from the air. It is plain then that the pea plant obtains a considerable advantage from its association with the lower organism. As to the method by means of which this association of organ- isms extracts the free nitrogen from the air, we are as yet in the dark. That it is free nitrogen that is assimilated by the plant and not combined nitrogen, has been demonstrated by the experiments of the last two years, but where the nitrogen is first fixed is as yet a question. It has been suggested that the bacteria themselves take the nitrogen out of the air and store it up in these tubercles; it has been suggested that the bacteria stimulate the legumes in such a way as to enable the legume to seize the free nitrogen from the air and store it in the roots; and it has been suggested that the assimilation of the nitrogen is a matter of the combined action of the bacteria and the legume life together. Which of these possibil- ities is the proper one science has not yet indicated, but it has been satisfactorily proved that through the combined life of the bac- teria in the root of the pea plant nitrogen is taken from the air and stored up in the roots of the pea plant in the form of nitrogen compounds of high complexity. che The work on this subject of nitrogen assimilation at the outset seemed to indicate that the family of legumes alone possess the power of absorbing nitrogen from the air. Undoubtedly, this fam- ily possesses this power to a greater extent than any other family of plants, but it is still a question whether the same power is not developed in certain other plants. Upon this matter experiment- ers are not in agreement at the present time, for while some ex- periments have plainly pointed to a nitrogen assimilation of non 156 legumes, the results are somewhat indefinite, and it is diffi- cult at present to determine the truth. Be this as it may, the fact still remains that it is to legumes chiefly that we must look for the restocking of our soils with nitrogen. It has been a difficult matter to make any very valuable quan- titative tests upon this power of bacteria and legumes to assimi- late nitrogen from the air. Still, within the last year or two quite a number of extended experiments have been turned in this direc- tion. Experiments have shown in the first place, that in regard to some of the legumes at least, a greater amount of nitrogen can be assimilated through the agency of the bacteria alone than can be assimilated by the same plants if they are fed with nitrogen foods. The same species of legumes are grown under two conditions, in both cases supplied with the organism which produces its root tubercles, and in the one experiment fed with nitrogen foods in the form of nitrates, and in the other not thus fed. The result shows a considerable difference to the advantage of the plants that are not fed with nitrates. The amount of nitrogen which can be assimilated and fixed in the soil by these legumes is really very great. In experiments with scarlet clover it has been found that a plant will assimilate from the air more than twelve times the amount of nitrogen in the seed. In one of the most recent experiments it has been found that by the use of beans a single crop assimilates and fixes in the soil 225 pounds of nitrogen per acre, equivalent to about 1400 pounds of nitrate of soda. These figures are very striking and suggestive, and they show plainly what a very great agent in the fixation of nitrogen the legume plants can become when properly associated with their appropriate species of bacteria. Peas, beans, cow peas, alfalfa, vetch and clover appear thus far to be the most valuable plants for this purpose, but other legumes serve the same purpose. These experiments promise to be of the most incalulable value to the agriculturist and to the agricltural interests of the world in the future. They offer to our farmers a means of get- ting nitrogen without going to the expense of buying it, of enrich- ing their soil by simply cultivating upon it plants which experi- ment has shown most appropriate to the soils in question. They emphasize the value of clover as a crop to precede wheat, and ex- 157 + plain the great nutritive value of clover hay. Indeed, bacteriol- ogists are now beginning to wonder if it has not been through the agency of these micro-organisms that the large nitrate beds of the world have been deposited. The nitrate beds of Chili-are vast in extent, and it has been already suggested that these beds owe their deposition to the agency of some microbes, to bacteria asso- ciated with higher plants which have grown in these localities in past ages. If so, we see even more forcibly that at the very foundation the life of the world is dependent on the action of bac- teria. WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY. On the Casting-off of the Tips of Branches of Certain Trees— Part Il, By Auc. F. FOERSTE. (PLATES CXLVII. anpD CXLVIII.) In “‘Gray’s Structural and Systematic Botany,’*page 44, may be found the following passage: “When a terminal bud is formed* this is commonly the strong- €st or among the stronger. But in many cases it habitually or commonly fads to appear.t{ In the Elm the bud axillary to the last leaf of the season takes its place. In the common Lilac a pair of buds, which were in the axils of the uppermost of the op- posite leaves, seem to replace the terminal bud, which se/dom+ de- velops.” On page 49 are the following words: “In other cases, on the contrary, the branches grow on idefi- nitely until arrested by the cold of autumn; . . . the later-formed upper portion most commonly perishing from the apex downward — for a certain length 2x the winter.t The Rose and Raspberry, and, among trees, the Sumac and Honey-Locust, are good illustrations of this sort.”* In the September (1892) number of this journal the writer had occasion to show that the reason why the terminal bud fads to * Incidentally the author is chiefly referring to the scaly buds of ri Se enon + Not italicized in the original. 158 appear in some ligneous plants was because at an earlier date, be- fore terminal scaly buds were formed, the tips of the branches had fallen off at well marked joints. This was shown to be the case not only in the Elm, but also in other species. In the common Lilac the terminal scaly buds fail to appear, simply on account of the fact that at an early date the tips of the branches wither, though remaining more or less attached to the stem. As regards the perishing from the apex downward for a cer- tain length zz winter, this is no doubt true of the Rose and the Raspberry; but in the case of the Sumac and Honey Locust it just as certainly is false, since in the case of both these plants the tips of the branches are cast off at well marked joints before the close of summer, as will be seen in the following paragraphs. The preceding passages have not been quoted in a spirit of criticism, but in order to show that the subject of the casting-off of the tips of branches, although a common occurrence, has not yet received all the attention it deserves. In the présent paper it is desired to emphasize two facts, that this casting-off of tips occurs in widely different families, and that in certain minor groups of plants, or sections of families, the habit is common to many species, while in other groups scaly ter- minal buds are the rule. It is believed that the presence or ab- sence of terminal scars on winter twigs has additional interest, since their existence may assist greatly in the determination of trees in winter, as suggested by the writer in another paper re- cently. In the following notes, unless otherwise specified, the obser- vations refer to plants growing in the vicinity of Dayton, O., the examinations and figures were all made during the first week of August. Tila Americana (Fig. 5). See, also, Fig. 6, Plate CXXXIL, of this journal, showing the same species during its winter months. Fig. 7 of the same plate shows one of the very few tips of Zilia platyphylios, still remaining attached to its branch ws ie the vist days of May, at Heidelberg, Germany. Ptelea trifoliata (Fig. 20). The petioles are light green, the. bark of the twigs is of an almost chocolate brown color. Theter- 159 minal scar is roundly angulate, similar to that of Rhus glabra and Gymnocladus dioica. Xanthoxylum Americanum has terminal buds rising but little above the surface of the stem, and covered with a thick coating of short red hairs. Ailanthus glandulosus was figured (Fig. 5) on Plate CXXXII. of this journal. Ampelopsis quinquefolia (Fig. 26). This plant is a curious case of sympodial growth. After a node bearing a leaf but no tendril, there are quite normally two nodes bearing a leaf and also a ten- dril, then follows a node again without a tendril. The leaves have the appearance of being alternate, distichous. Where there is no tendril the leaf axil quite commonly contains a well developed scaly bud. Now it was a curious fact in all the observed cases that where the tips of the branches were absent, the scar belonged to that node where there should be no tendril. This is well worthy of note since in August many of the tendrils of this plant have fallen off and left scars, though these are much smaller than the terminal scars. In case of the grape it was very difficult to get Satisfactory tips of branches, since these tips were still growing, or had been eaten off by animals. In a very few cases I noticed, as in Ampelopsis, a scar where the node should bear no ten- dril, and I have figured one of these (Fig. 24). Celastrus scan- dens in September showed terminal scars only on the shorter, stronger branches, but later, in November, almost all branches showed terminal scars. “lisculus glabra (Fig. 14) and 4sculus Hippocastanum (Fig. 4 of Plate CXXXIL.), will be discussed at the close of this paper. Staphylea trifolia (Fig 12, see also Fig. 3 of Plate CXXXIL of this journal), has a very peculiar terminal scar, owing to the fact that the uppermost pair of buds have so compressed the sides of the terminal scar as to very much decrease its diameter in one direc- tion and to give it the form noticed in the figure. The central por- tion is depressed. The figure shows the stipules. Species of Negundo and Acer have terminal scaly buds. Rhus glabra, (Fig. 21) has a roundly-angulate terminal scar. The fruited tips of this species remain on the plant all winter, dying back as far as the first leaf bud, as may be expected in the case of any fruited tip of a stem, ee did not fall off after the 160 seeds were ripened (as is usually the case). All branches not ter- minated with flower clusters, cast off their tips at well marked scars. Rhus copallina sheds a tip about 15 mm. long, consisting of three or four leaves with very hairy, strong petioles and very small and narrow, almost needle-like leaflets, 3-4 mm. long. Khus aromatica (Fig. 18) casts off its leaves at a point a little above the base of the petiole; the portion remaining attached to the stem is rather appressed, and hides the subtended bud during its earlier development. The terminal scar is found at the end of a round, rod-like tip, which may be produced quite a distance beyond the point of attachment of the uppermost remaining leaf. Rhus radi- cans has terminal scaly buds. Robinia Pseudacacia (Fig. 3). The terminal scar is somewhat ir- regular, owing to the angulate character of the branches. In con- sequence of shrinking, subsequent to the falling off of the tip, the terminal scar is quite puckered up, as is also the case with Gledit- schia triacanthos. The figure shows the top of the branch still at- tached, but withering, and the position of the scar is already indi- cated by the fact that the yellow color of the withering part stops abruptly at a plane bounding the green portion further down which is to remain. Even before the slightest withering has commenced, it is already possible to see at what node the plane of separation is to be by the fact that whereas the last leaf of the remaining por- tion develops rapidly. into a full sized leaf, the next succeeding leaf which is to fall off shows retarded growth at a very early stage, while the tip is still green. During the first week of August all the tips of the higher branches had fallen off. This was true also of the lower branches, where the tree was fully developed. Occasionally, however, the lower branches were more vigorous, and were still continuing growth, or were preparing to also cast off their tips. From one of these lower branches the figure was taken. In young growth, or in fresh shoots from cut down stumps, the tips of the branches were often present in the middle of August, but in the middle of September all the tips seemed to be shed. In the axils of the leaves are little -raised circular scars, left by axillary buds which are cast off ata very early stage of their development. In the figure these are shown in all except the lowest axil. In very vigorous shoots 161 these buds develop into leafy branches during the same season. It is especially to be noted that the lower branches of a tree are often still growing after the tips of all the upper branches have been cast off. Gleditschia triacanthos (Fig. 6) shows all the features just noted of Rodinia The only bud which is visible in the axil of the leaves is extra-axillary, being situated a short dis- tance above the axil. This bud is cast off as a rule, at an early Stage, or on very vigorous branches, develops into a leafy branch during the same season. The extra-axillary compound thorn of this tree is morphologically equivalent to these buds. As a rule the thorns are developed chiefly along the middle portion of each year’s growth, but occasionally the thorns occur even at the upper- most axils destined to remain. In that case the terminal scar is formed just above the last thorn. The visible buds therefore, of both Robinia and Gleditschia, (unless they be represented by thorns or develop into leaf branches the same season) are cast off. The buds which continue the growth of the branch are hidden away beneath the petioles of the leaves at this time of the year, so that the cast off buds are in reality the uppermost ones of a series of a Superposed bud. Gymmnocladus dioica, (Fig. 7) has a roundly angu- late terminal scar. The superposed buds are sunken in pits, and often drop out. This is especially true of the largest bud in the axil of the last remaining leaf, this bud being the uppermost one of its series, and hence, lying next to the terminal scar. Cercis Canadensis, (Fig. 2) has a little rounded terminal scar. The last remaining leaf has a petiole placing itself in line with the stem, as is quite commonly the case where the phyllotaxy is alternate and disti- chous. A glance at the figures on the accompanying plates will readily show this. It is not uncommon to find more than one bud even in the last remaining axil, and the larger of these superposed buds, the upper one of the series, lies then i Sita the terminal Scar. Prunus Americana (Fig. 19) shows very distinct terminal scars. It is more usual for ligneous Rosacez to have terminal scaly buds, so the present exception is worth noting. ae Calycanthus floridus (Fig. 25) has well marked terminal sca e It was impossible to determine satisfactorily whether Sam- bucus Canadensis ever had terminal scars or not. In the . 162 . early days of August many branches were still growing. Later in the year some branches were found terminated by scars, but these seemed to be caused by the breaking off of the fruited flower clusters at the ends of the branches. Lonicera flava (Fig. 22) has the tips withering away, but not falling off at a well marked scar. The dried up tips may be seen between the upper pair of leaf buds. Cephalanthus occidentalis has its branches almost invariably ter- minated by inflorescences, a part of which have never developed ° into flowers. The few tips with flower buds show shriveled-up leaves at the ends of stems, drying back a little, thus giving rise to sympodial growth. Catalpa speciosa, Warder, was figured (Figs. 1, 2) on Plate CXXXIL. of this journal. During the early days of August most of the tips had been cast off; here and there the very short, shriveled remains embracing only a few nodes were still attached to the stem. The tips of a few of the lower branches were grow- ing vigorously and did not lose their tips until later during the month. It was impossible to get satisfactory specimens from 7Ze- coma radicans. Many branches were still growing when exam- ined. Where there were terminal scars it was often possible to ascribe these to the falling of the flower clusters, where fruiting had not set in. One case was found where apparently the leafy tips of a branch had fallen off, but the case was not altogether sat- isfactory. Diospyros Virginiana, with its shriveled-up tip, was figured (Fig. 9) on Plate CXXXII. of this journal. Terminal scars are also common. Ulmus Americana (Fig. 10 and Fig. 8 of Plate CXXXII. of this journal) and Ulmus fulva (Fig. 8) both lose the tips of their branches, indeed, quite early in the year. Ulmus campestris was observed at Heidelberg, Germany, to have lost about one-third of its tips during the last week of May, although the future plane of separation was becoming visible in the remainder. Celts occt- dentalis (Fig. 11) also shows the terminal scar. A little feature was noted which will well serve to readily distinguish this tree in winter time, when other aids are not at hand. The scaly bud in the axil of the last remaining leaf is quite strongly bent away from 163 its leaf and recurved over the terminal scar, the bud itself giving evidence of this curvature. The appressed nature of the remain- ing buds is also worthy of note. It has already been remarked here several times that the lower branches of trees seem to be more vigorous and frequently are still growing when all the upper branches have already cast off their tips. In the case of Celtis occidentalis this found expression in an- other way. A number of trees were found early in August, on the * Germantown road, on the way to the Soldiers’ Home, which had lost all the tips of this year’s normally produced branches. But in the case of many of the lower branches the uppermost scaly bud had not waited till next year for its development, but had renewed growth during the same season. In August the tips of even this second crop of branches had been already cast off in many cases. But here and there the tips were still attached, though turning yel- low in color and giving evidence of the location of the future plane of separation. The tips included only a few nodes, and were 4-6 mm. long. Morus rubra (Fig. 4) has well developed terminal scars, with a depressed central portion. The milky juice of the bark will also serve to distinguish the species when the leaves are gone. In winter the twigs of Zila have a similar appearance, but its terminal scar has no depressed centre. loxylon pomiferum (Fig. 1) was found during the first days of August to have: cast the tips of all the more mature branches. But where the hedges had been cut and a fresh crop of branches had appeared many branches were still growing, and the tips were therefore vigorous. Later in the year this younger crop of branches also lost its tips. In the more mature trees all the branches had lost their tips in September. Platanus occidentalis (Fig. 9) is one of the more interesting of trees which shed the tips of their branches, owing to the fact that the lower part of the connate stipules forms a sheath em- bracing the stem, That portion of the tip which is destined to fall off, ceases growth quite soon and withers; being surrounded by the sheath of the stipules, it may be either entirely included within the same or it may project a little from the sheath (Fig. A). After a time both the tip of the branch and the surrounding stipular 164 sheath fall off and a terminal scar is left (Fig. B). Both stages were visible during the first week of August. The uppermost sub- petiolar bud continues the growth of the branch; this is, however, an axillary bud. It does not become visible until the leaves of that part of the stem which remains have fallen off. Corylus Americana (Fig. 15) casts off its tips while they are still small. One of these tips is here figured. The axillary scaly buds are small and oval or rounded, showing but three or four scales exteriorly; the base of the leaves is distinctly and strongly heart shaped. Ostrya Virginica (Fig. 16) has long, pointed axil- lary scaly buds, showing six or more scales exteriorly. The peti- oles about equal the buds in length. The lower half of the leaves is wedge-shaped, with a narrow base. The tip of the leaves is long, almost awl-pointed. Carpinus Virginiana (Fig. 17) has ovate obtuse scaly axillary buds. The petiole of the leaves is more than three times as long as the subtended scaly buds. The lower half of the leaves is much less evidently wedge-shaped, and the base is more rounded than in the last species. The short, almost abruptly pointed tip of the leaves is quite a useful distin- guishing feature. In all three species just enumerated, the termi- nal scar is very tiny, and often difficult to find. Their leaves are alternate, and distichous. In the scaly buds this phyllotaxy is ob- scured by the fact that most of the scales represent stipules, and hence occur in pairs; on this account the distichous arrangement of the elements of the bud cannot be readily made’ out. This characteristic will serve to distinguish these genera from the or- dinary distichous plants during winter months. Species of Quercus, Castanea and Fagus show terminal scaly buds. Some species of Sa/ix show terminal scars (Fig. 13) | Observed species of Populus have terminal scaly buds. Some species of Svzz/ax show at times a short shriveled up rem- nant of the tip of the branches, at others a terminal scar (Fig. 23). The best cases of groups of plants casting off the tips of their branches quite generally are the Leguminosz, Urticacez, the Car- pineze among Cupuliferz, perhaps the Bignoniacez, and to a lesser © degree the genera Zilia, Staphylea and Aesculus, the sections Su- mac and Lobadium of Rhus, possibly the Vitacez in part, and ap- parently a fair proportion of the species of the genus Sa/zx. 165 The preceding list includes 23 genera in which the cast- ing off of the tips has been noted with certainty. The list is by no means complete for the northeastern United States, but in- cludes chiefly such plants as the writer could find growing near Dayton, Ohio, and use for the purposes of illustration. They cer- tainly indicate that the method of securing determinate growth by the casting off of the tips of branches (usually early in the summer, and quite generally before the first of August) is a fairly common and normal one, and as such is worthy of mention in discussions of the habits of trees. One of the most interesting features about the growth of trees is the shortness of the period of development of the twigs of the year. The winter months at Bainbridge, in Georgia, have been unusually severe this year (1893), so that the vegetation was de- cidedly backward. At the beginning of March very few leaves had made their appearance on trees. At the close of this month quite a number had already developed their terminal scaly buds, or had begun to cast off the tips of their branches. In some cases the terminal buds were seen in but little more than two weeks after the leaves began to appear. The following notes were taken at the end of March: 4sculus Pavia had well formed terminal buds; the exterior pair of scales of these buds show a leaf-like tip at first, but this falls off at an early date at a scar having about the level of the top of the bud at this time. Careful search for terminal scars did not reveal any which could not be referred to the casting off of flower peduncles after the period of flowering. “4. glabra is probably in the same case, and it is equally likely that the supposed terminal scars of sculus Hippocastanum are caused by the falling off of flower peduncles, although I was try- ing to guard against this error at the time the first part of this paper was written. Enonymus Americanus in one case had dao the inter- nodes Of the scaly bud so much as to elevate the innermost scales 120 mm. above the base of the former winter bud. The leafy por- tion was 300 mm. long and consisted of 6 pairs of leaves. The terminal bud was already formed. Acer saccharinum, Hamamelis Virginica, Cornus florida and Viburnum prunifolium had already ter- | minal scaly buds. The less vigorous branches of /uglans nigra 166 had ceased producing new leaves. Several species of oaks had already developed far enough to show terminal buds on many trees while on others the leaves had not yet begun to make their appearance. Quercus nigra furnished a good example of a plant which has most of the nodes for next year’s growth already indicated in the bud. The stipules of 14 leaves showed distinctly that they had formed part of the scaly bud during the winter, and this was, not improbably, also true of most of the stipules farther up. It is evi- dent therefore, that the growth of the new crop of branches was little more than the development of the leaves whose position was already determined in the winter bud. Many beeches, Fagus, ferruginea, had formed their terminal buds, although these were still very small and did not at all resemble the winter buds. Regarding the early development of terminal scaly buds it may be observed that at the time of their detection they are far from being fully developed, and they are often still very dissimilar from their fully grown winter form. Moreover at the time of their first detection the internodes of the new year’s twigs have not yet fin- ished their growth, so that the terminal bud is already indicated at a time when the full length of the twig has not yet. been at- tained. Vaccinium tenellum at the end of March was shedding the tiny tips of the branches consisting of two or three very minute leaves. Carpinus Virginiana was shedding tips about 3 mm. long, some- times longer, of which the leaf elements could be recognized more readily. Although the old branches of Leucothoe axillaris gave evidence that they had shed their tips during the preceding year, the new crop of branches had scarcely started in March. Both methods of terminating the growth of the year, that by means of the formation of terminal scaly buds, and that of casting off the tips of branches, are employed very early in the year, as just seen. When, however, a ligneous plant does not terminate its growth until late in the year, the casting off of the tips of the branches seems to be the rule, where killing back of the tips does not obtain. It would be interesting to learn how many ligneous ‘plants develop terminal scaly buds after the first of June, for ex- ample, in a more northern climate. It is believed that the casting 167 off of the tips of branches would be much more common after that date. Description of Plates CXLVII. and CXLVIII. Fig. 1. Joxylon pomiferum; with a tounded protuberance at the side of the bud. : Fig. 2, Cercis Canadensis ; with superposed buds in the last axil. Fig. 3. Rodinia Pseudacacia ; with the tip destined to be cast off still in posi- tion, but with the future plane of separation already indicated; at @ is the upper one of the series of superposed buds, destined to be cast off, and to leave a small protuber- ance as at 4, Fig. 4. Morus rubra; with magnified view of the terminal scar, with a de- pressed centre. Fig. §. Zilia Americana. Fig. 6. Gleditschia triacanthos; at a, is the upper one of the series of superposed buds destined to be cast off, as at 4; the remaining buds of the series are usually all sub-petiolar ; in the axil of the last remaining leaf, the figure shows the next lower bud, just peeping from beneath the base of the petiole; an upper view of this portion of the branch, somewhat enlarged, isadded. The thorn is the equivalent of the upper super- posed bud which usually drops off before the close of August. Fig. 7. Gymnocladus dioica; with only the uppermost of the superposed buds of the last remaining axil visible in the figure. Fig. 8. Ulmus fulva. Fig. 9. Platanus occidentalis: two figures; the upper one still retaining the shriveled up tip of the branch, with the enclosing stipules belonging to the last re- maining leaf. In the lower figure these have been cast off. Fig. 10. Ulmus Americana. oe Fig. 11. Celtis occideptalis; the upper-axillary bud strongly recurved, a distin- tinguishing feature of this genus. : Fig. 12. Staphylea trifolia; showing the stipules belonging to the upper pair of remaining leaves; also a magnifled end view of the terminal scar. Fig. 13. Salix. Fig. 14. -£sculus glabra; when the end of the twig does not fall away, and when there has been no flower cluster, a scaly bud terminates the stem. ~~ Fig. 15. Corylus Americana; with a drawing of the small tip which has been cast off. Fig. 16. Ostrya Virginica. Fig. 17. Carpinus Virginiana. Fig : ph iat two figures. The Seiich in most cases is termi- nated by a flowering catkin destined to blossom next year. : Fig. 19. Prunus Americana. Fig. 20. Prelea trifoliata, Fig. 21 Rhus gan The branches are often terminated by. the remnants of : last season’s flower clusters. Fig. 22, Lonicera flava, with the shriveled up ee of thie branch th adhering. 168 Fig. 23. Smilax hispida ; with a terminal scar. Often the tip of the branches simply shrivels up, and a part or all remains attached to the remainder of the stem. Fig. 24. Vitis. Fig. 25. Calycanthus floridus. Fig. 26. Ampelopsis quinguefolia. In all the figures ¢. sc. indicates the terminal scar; s/r. ¢/., the shriveled tips re- maining in case of some plants, and ¢, the scar left by the casting off of the tendrils, A new Fossil Palm from the Cretaceous Formation at Glen Cove, Long Island. By ARTHUR HOLLICK. (PLATE CXLIX.) For some years past the writer has been engaged in the study of the Cretaceous formation of this vicinity, particularly on Staten and Long Islands, and a considerable amount of material repre- senting the fossil flora of that formation has been collected. The specimens from Staten Island have already been described, * —those from Long Island it is hoped to describe in full in the near future, but in the meantime it has been thought best to publish in advance the accompanying description and plate. Probably the greatest surprise experienced in the study of the above mentioned material was in the discovery of an undoubted palm leaf. The significance of this discovery from the geological standpoint need not here receive more than brief mention, as this will be fully discussed elsewhere. It is sufficient to say that the other fossil leaves associated with it show the geological horizon to be the equivalent of the Amboy clays of New Jersey and other middle Cretaceous strata in America and Europe, from none of which have palms been definitely recorded. In fact the presence of palms in lower and middle Cretaceous strata is so rare, if not entirely wanting, that this discovery seems to warrant special at- tention. They appear in great abundance in upper Cretaceous. and Tertiary rocks, and their sudden appearance without any ap- parent ancestry has always been a puzzle. The significance of the find may therefore be appreciated. * Trans. N. Y. Acad. Sci. xi. 96-103, Plates i-iv. and xii. 1-12, Plates i—iv- . 169 The specimen in question evidently belongs with the tribe Coryphez, and its nearest living allies are to looked for in the genera Jrithrinax, Copernicia, Thrinax or Serenea (Sabal). The imperfect condition of our specimen does not admit of accurate comparison, but there seems to be but little doubt that it is allied to this group, and as we find associated with it leaves of trees which demonstrate that they were the ancestors of our living Lirioden- aron, Platanus, Sassafras, etc., we are certainly within the bounds of reason when we infer that we have here one of the ancestors of our Southern “ Palmetto,” as I have indicated in the generic name. The specific name has been adopted in honor of Prof. Jas. F, Kemp, of Columbia College, to whom the credit for finding the specimen is due. Serenopsis, N. Gen. Leaves small, fan-shaped, deeply pinnatifid, palmately about 18 divided. Rays tapering to acute tips and broadening into blunt wedge-shaped bases. SERENOPSIS Kempil. Leaves circular or sub-cordate in outline, . somewhat longer than broad, 3 to 3% inches in diameter. Rays radiating in all directions from the sub-triangular apex of the petiole; confluent for a distance of about 4% to 4 inch from the petiole, then divergent; central ones about 2% inches long, outer (lower) ones about % inch long; average width about ,; inch; margins entire (?); nervation obscure. Only a single specimen was found. The two figures represent counterparts of the same one. Botanical Notes. Scabtiosa australis, Wulf—Mr. Redfield will find on page 46 of. the Cayuga Flora a statement of the thorough establishment of Scabiosa australis, not only near Farley’s Point, Cayuga Lake, but all along the lake shore meadows of Union Springs for five miles. Moreover, a full description of the species is given in the Flora, and the date of its first discovery (the first in America, probably), viz., 1881; also a reference to the possible dissemination of it from the little botanic garden of David Thomas, civil engineer and 170 clever naturalist, who, with other members of the Society of Friends, made their home in this very locality over eighty years ago. He was the author of Ul/mus racemosa, a characteristic tree of Central New York. In the herbarium of J. J. Thomas the writer found a specimen of this Scadiosa collected from the garden of David Thomas nearly seventy years since. There is no ques- tion but that the weed has come to stay. It forms a turf of its own in favorable localities, and is more abundant about Union Springs than ten years ago. I have since found it in the township of Montezuma, twenty miles north. L. S. Jr. UNIveRsiTy, PALO ALTO. W. R. DUDLEY. Amarantus blitoides, WWatson.—Mr. Lighthipe’s note in the February BULLETIN announcing the occurrence of Amarantus bli- toides in New Jersey within the “one hundred mile limit,’ prompts me to say that this species is well established within the corporate limits of New York city. It is to be found along the Hudson River Railroad track about Kingsbridge, Mount St. Vin- cent and Fort Washington, and doubtless at other points even nearer to the city proper. It grows on the gravelly road-bed, sometimes even between the rails, and on the adjoining em- bankments. EuGeneE P. BICKNELL. Death of Dr. Vasey—Dr. George Vasey, Botanist of the United States Department of Agriculture, died at his home in Washington, D. C., after a brief illness, on March 4th, in his seventy-first year. Dr. Vasey’s acquaintance with North Ameri- can Grasses was probably unequalled by that of any living botan- ist. All the later years of his life have been devoted to their study, and his publications upon them have been numerous and varied. A sketch of his life will appear in a subsequent issue of the BULLETIN. Dr. Vasey is succeeded by Mr. F. V. Coville, who has been for several years his assistant, and no better choice could have been made in filling the position left vacant. Mr. Coville brings to the post the enthusiasm and activity of youth, high botanical sagacity, tact, a capital scientific education and good administra- tive ability. He will well represent American Science both here and abroad. ee 171 Proceedings of the Club. Tuespay, Marcu 14, 1893. The President in the chair and twenty-six persons present. The Editor announced that a paper by Prof. L. M. Under- wood, on the Bibliography of Hepaticology, would form part 1 of Vol. IV. of the Memorrs, and that Dr. Rusby’s first publications upon. Mr. Bang’s Bolivian collections would form the third part of Vol. III. Dr. Morong exhibited the interesting fruit of a species of the Asclepiadaceous genus Exolodus from Paraguay, and remarked upon the habits of the plant. The following active members were elected: Mr. Theodore G. White, Mr. Louis Froelich, Mr. Rudolph Weber, Mr. Steward- son Brown, Mr. Joseph D. Crawford. The announced papers of the evening were then read as fol- lows: “Notes on Cladosporium fulvum, by Miss Effie A. South- worth. This fungus is a parasite of the tomato plant, most injur- ious in the winter season to hot-house plants, thus being especially destructive from an economic point of view. The fungus appar- ently grows entirely between the cells, and commonly makes its appearance protruding through the stomata. The first appear- ance is that of whitish spots on the under sides of the leaves, which soon turn yellow, yellow spots at the same time devel- oping opposite these upon the upper surface. The Bordeaux mixture is especially valuable in treatment. Miss Southworth presented a very interesting life history of the plant, well illus- trated by blackboard drawing. “Some Theories about Osmosis,” by Dr. Emily L. Gregory. This paper will be published in a subsequent issue of the But- LETIN. “Preliminary Notes on the Atlantic Coast Species of Polysi- Phonia,” by Mr. Carlton C. Curtiss. WeEpneEspay, MARCH 29, 1893. Vice President Morong in the chair and twenty-eight persons present. Dr. D. T. Millspaugh of 89 Hamilton Place, Paterson, N. J., and Prof. Elmer E. Sherman of South Orange, N. J., were elected active members. 172 The following communications were then presented: By Mr. Arthur Hollick, “On Palm Leaves from the Creta- ceous Strata at Glen Cove, L. I.” The paper is printed in the present BULLETIN. By Dr. Thomas Morong, on “The North American Species of Smilax.” The paper was fully illustrated by numerous specimens and was discussed by Messrs. Hollick, Curtiss and Rusby. By Dr. Britton and Mr. Kraemer, “On a Collection of Plants made by Dr. Timothy E. Wilcox, U. S. A., in the Vicinity of Fort Huachuca, Arizona.” Several species new to the United States Flora were presented. The presentation by the editor of a copy of Dr. Morong’s Monograph of the North American Naiadacee, Memorrs, Vol. III, Part 2, elicited an expression of thanks from the author to members of the Club for their assistance, by which it had been possible for his work to become published. Index to Recent Literature Relating to American Botany. Abutilon— Ueber die Gattung. A Garcke (Engler’s Bot. Jahrb. xv. 480-492). , Agave filifera. \. Miinzer (Monatsb. Kakteenk. iii. 17). Note on the flowering of this species in the Berlin Botanical Garden. Botanical Congress—An International, Chas. E. Bessey (Amer. Nat. 1893, 279). Dr. Bessey, as Vice President of the Section of Botany, A. A. A. S., has appointed a committee of eleven botanists to arrange for an international Botanical Congress to be held at Madison next August. Buttonwood—The. J. T. Rothrock (Forest Leaves, iv. 5, 6). With a fine illustration of Platanus occidentalis. Catalogue of the Flowering Plants and Vascular Cryptogams, found in and near Lackawanna and Wyoming Valleys, Pa. William R. Dudley and Charles O. Thurston (Wilkes-Barre, Pa., 1892). This is substantially a reprint of the preliminary list published in 1887 by Prof. Dudley (then of Cornell, now of the Leland Stan- ford University, Cal.), in the Proceedings of the Lackawanna Insti-_ ; 173 tute of Scranton, altered and enlarged by the addition of species since collected, with the aid of Prof. C. O. Thurston, of the Wyom- ing Seminary at Kingston. The typography is excellent, and the style of the whole and the paper are all that can be desired. The number of additional species reported is not as great, however, as _ might have been expected. Of the few rare ones new to Pennsyl- vania Pyrus sambucifolia, Cham. and Schlecht., discovered near Luzerne by Prof. Thurston, who has kindly sent me a specimen, is, perhaps, the most interesting. His description of the spot where it was found excludes all suspicion of escape from culture. The only thing that mars the value of this beautiful catalogue is that no herbarium exists behind it, by which its contents could be verified. ; Pe oe ig Coccocypselum hirsutum (Bot. Mag. t. 7278). Native of Central America and Trinidad. Composite, Observations on the—III. Edward L. Greene (Ery- thea, i. 53-56). Discussion of the characters and relationships of the genera Coleosanthus and Kuhnia. Cornels or Dogwoods. (Garden, xliii. 152.) Cornus florida is figured, and a number of other species mentioned. Development of Spermagonia in Caeoma nitens. H. M. Richards. (Proc. Amer. Acad.) This contribution from the Cryptogamic Laboratory of Har- vard University (xix) shows that the spermagonia start “ from an outgrowth between and not in the epidermal cells of the host.” The pressure induced by the multiplication of fungous cells causes a breaking away and final absorption of the adjoining epidermal cells and the abnormal increase in size of those surrounding the forming spermagonium. A plate adds emphasis to the details of the process as described in the paper. By DH. Flora of Cumberland, Md. (5 pages, no author given [Howard Shriver]; no date given [1892].) An alphabetical list of several hundred species collected for the Cumberland High School. Immigrant Plants in Los Angeles County, California. Anstruther Davidson (Erythea, i. 56-61; aepine 174 Jusst@a repens of Linneus. F.von Mueller (Erythea, i. 61, 62). Prof. Greene prints a letter from Baron von Mueller, calling attention to the fact that the true /usszea repens, L., occurs only in . India, and that the North American plant so-called is probably /. diffusa, Forsk. Lespedeza—The North American Species of. N. L. Britton. (Trans. N. Y. Acad. Sci. xii. 57-68; reprinted as Contrib. Herb. Col. Coll. No. 34.) Twelve species are recognized and concisely described. Notes are given on distribution and on type specimens. Two new varieties are proposed. Lichens of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania—Preliminary Enumer- | ation of the. A. A. Heller (pp. 4, Lancaster, 1893). A list of 78 species, with localities and habitats. Loco—Some Observations upon. Dr. Mayo (Bull. Kans. Agric. Exp. Sta. No. 35). The author concludes that the “Loco” disease is the result of malnutrition caused by the affected animals eating freely of Astragalus mollissimus, or Oxytropis Lamberti. The presence of. any narcotic principle in these plants is doubted. Mangrove-tree—The. (Garden and Forest, vi. 97). With two illustrations of Rhizophora Mangle, one showing the tree rising from a mass of underbrush, the other showing the lower part of the trunk and the roots. Mamillaria prismatica. (Bot. Mag. t. 7279). Native of Mexico. A species of the group Amhalonium. Metasperme of the Minnesota Valley. Conway MacMillan. (Rept- Geol. and Nat. Hist. Surv. Minn. Botanical Series, i. cloth, pp- 826, two maps; Minneapolis, Minn., dated Dec. 29, 1892). In his preface the author expresses satisfaction at the action of the Botanical Club of the A. A. A.S., taken at the Rochester meeting of 1892, in its endeavor to establish nomenclature “ upon some other than a personal basis,’’ and states that the initial date, 1753, would have been adopted by him, for genera as well as species, in this work, had not most of it been in type when the Club’s action was taken. In order to comply with the principle, 175 however, the following list is inserted for the convenience of those who may wish to note the necessary changes: Mariscus, Hall. (1742). = Cladium, P. Br. (1756). Cyperella, Cram. (1 744). == Juncodes, Adans. (1763). Ramaium, Rumpf. (1747). = Boehmeria, Jacq. (1763). Stellularia, Linn. (1748). = Stellaria, Linn. (1753). Leuconymphea, Ludw. (1737). = Castalia, Salisb. (1805). Nymphea, Ludw. (1737). = Nymphea, Salisb. (1805). Capnorchis, Ludw. (1737). = Bikukulla, Adans. (1 763). Cracca, Linn. (1747). = Colonilla, Adans. (1763).* Ricinocarpus, Burm. (1737). = Acalypha, Linn. (175 3). Stellaria, Ludw. (1737). = Callitriche, Linn. (1753). Lapula, Hall. (1745). = Lappula, Moench. (1794). Leptostachya, Mitch. (1 748). = Phryma, Linn. (1753). Pentagonia, Sieg. (1737). = Legousia, Dur. (1782). The rule which excepts duplicate binomials, as Phragmites Phragmites (Linn.) from the law of priority, is also gracefully ac- cepted, and wherever such binomials are found in the work the request is made that the second oldest specific name be used, although the author was not and is not now in sympathy with any such exception. The above binomial would thus become Phrag- mites vulgaris (Lam.). An exceedingly terse and sharp enunciation of the author's views in regard to the question of nomenclature may be found under the heading “ Citation of authors of genera and species ” beginning on p. 11, which is worthy of attention from all who still believe in the « position of naming-plants-as-one-pleases.”’ In tracing the history of the movement towards a stable system of nomenclature in America, Prof. Britton is given undue prominence. The argument was begun by Prof. Greene. In its general classification the work is not only well abreast of the times, but far ahead of all our manuals and text books. All schemes of classification are necessarily evanescent or at least _Should be sufficiently elastic to permit of interpolation or amend- ment whenever newly discovered facts render it advisable or neces- Sary, and, as the author says: “ While, therefore, the constant shifting from one classification to another is exasperating to the * Cracca, L., appears in the “ Species Plantarum” of 1753, : : _ 176 conservative student, it is nevertheless a necessary result of ad- vancing information, and to refuse to consider the new systems which may be put forth in scientific fashion, is as unreasonable as it was in those days when the railway carriages were first brought into use for one to insist upon traveling by the old stage lines of an earlier mechanical era.” The author believes that “the eye should be cast forward in- stead of backward, that the future should receive consideration as well as the past.” He also evinces no consideration for those who would leave all changes and innovations in nomenclature and classi- fication to monographers. He believes that the public has a right to demand the best and most advanced ideas and convictions, even in local floras and catalogues, and in this we are in hearty accord, as it is mostly through these that a large number of lay botanists must receive such education, the ordinary text book being necessarily years behind the times. The scheme of classification adopted in this work is based upon the most recent investigations in plant morphology. Two main groups are recognized: A. PrRoropuyta and B. METAPHYTA, based upon the absence or presence of sexuality. Exact limits between the two are necessarily impracticable, on ac- count of the presence of transition forms, some of which seem to indicate a progressive development from the lower to the higher group—others which appear to be undergoing a retrograde meta- morphosis. The Metaphyta are divided into 1. GAMopHyTA and 11. SPOROPHYTA, dependent upon the development of the fertilized ovum. As examples of i. are given “the lower Zygophyta and Oophyta of Bessey, plants like the pond-scum (Zygnema) or the black-mould (Rhizopus, Mucor).” -Division ii. would therefore comprise practically all plants with which we are familiar in the entire range of botany, except what we have been in the habit of calling the Protophyta and lower Thallophyta. In the Sporo- phyta three “alliances” are recognized: . (1). Thallophyta, which includes the seaweeds, fresh water algae, and the higher spore-fruit-producing fungi, such as mush- rooms and puff balls. (2). Archegoniate, which includes such forms as Chara and Nitella, the Hepaticae, the Musci, the Filices and their allies, Cycads, Conifers, etc. 177 (3). Metaspermz, which includes all those plants formerly classed under Angiosperme, or, in the words of the author, ex- amples of the Metaspermz may be selected from the great mass of plants which contain their seeds in a closed “ovary,” better named “carpellum.” These, then, are alone what have been con- sidered by the author in the present work. Even our old and ap- parently firmly established friends the Mono- and Dicotyledones have been transferred to a more subordinate position than they once held, and we find the metasperme divided primarly into Chalazagamez, consisting of the single genus Casuarina, and Poro- gamez, which includes all the other Metasperme and in which the Mono- and Dicotyledons are at last permitted to figure as sub- divisions. The former are not subject to any further subdivis- ions, but the latter are arranged, in accordance with the morphol- ogy of the perianth into Archichlamydaz [ Polypetale and Apeta-_ lz], and Metachlamydee [Gamopetale]. The skeleton scheme of classification would thus appear : A. Protophyta. B. Metaphyta. I, GAMOPHYTA. II. SPOROPHYTA. (1) THALLOPHYTA, (2) ARCHEGONIAT#, (3) METASPERMé. Metasperme., (a) Chalazagamec. (b) Porogamez. 1, Monocotyledones. 2. Dicotyledones. Archichlamydez. Metachlamydez. Under this arrangement the list begins with Porogamee (Monocotyledones), Family Typhacee, Genus Zypha, Species 7. latifolia, Linn. and terminates with Family Composite, Genus LTieracium, Species H. Canadense, Michx. The total number of families enumerated is 106, genera 407, and species and varieties 1,174. The number of changes in long established names is neces- sarily considerable. Most of them have, however, already been adopted by other progressive botanists and have appeared in print 178 elsewhere. We note with some amusement that the author's rigid conscientiousness has caused him to take up Rafinesque’s misprint name “ Scoria,’ instead of “A/icoria,’ as he originally wrote it. The limitations of many genera and families are cur- tailed or extended, as the case may be, and several old genera are revived. The bibliography and synonomy cover families, genera and species and evince an immense amount of careful and conscien- tious research, which will save many hours of labor to future workers in metaspermic botany for which they owe the author a heavy debt of gratitude. An innovation which will be welcomed by many is the citation, under the genus, of any fossil form which may have been identified. In this connection the geological horizon, locality and authority are given. Following the list is a general description of the region, which in- cludes its geographical location, physiography, distribution of forest and prairie, soil, climate and geological history. The palzobotanist will find in the chapter entitled, “ Relationships of the Metaspermic Flora of the Minnesota Valley,” much of interest and more or less food for thought. The old problems in regard to plant dissemina- tion and distribution are again brought forward. “How did the present plant inhabitants enter the Minnesota Valley?” ‘What relation does this modern plant-population bear to the more ancient one which was overwhelmed by the glacial detritus, piled 250 feet thick over the old level of the country?” “Under what laws did the repopulation of the Valley progress?” “Along what routes did the incoming plants travel?” etc. The author begins this discussion by calling attention to the constant condition of strain or tension that exists between plants or groups of plants in the struggle for existence—in other words their “ dynamic inter-rela- tion.” Such a condition he thinks should be recognized more fully in terminology and suggests that instead of speaking ofa ‘‘ northern” group of plants we should designate it as the “ south-bound” group, and similarly a southern group might be called a “ zorth- bound” group, as these plants, already established in the north or south, as the case may be, have probably reached their limits of extension to the north and south respectively, and whatever further extension is to be accomplished must be southward for the 179 northern plants and northward for the southern plants. A line or area of tension is thus formed, and if the world in general is con- sidered, two main tension areas or zones will be apparent, one to the north and another to the south of the equator. In these zones of tension, where the competition between northern and southern forms is greatest, transitional floras are to be found. In the Minnesota valley the author notes the fact, which has received attention in other localities, that the southern or north-bound plants are largely endemic, or in other words American in type, while the northern or south-bound ones are generally less so, in other words foreign in type. The division of the earth into natural vegetation regions has been attempted by several authorities, notably by Griesebach, Engler and Drude, all of whose regional classifications are given in full and discussed in so far as North America is concerned. The author’s conclusions are that there isa greater homogeneity in the regions of the northern than in those of the southern hemi- sphere, the reasons being both geographical and geological. Geographically the facilities for migration and commingling are much more favorable in the northern than they are in the south- ern hemisphere, which latter consists of a series of isolated areas, whereas the former is practically a compact circle of land sur- rounding the pole, broken only by narrow bodies or arms of water. Geologically all the evidence is in favor of a closer rela- tionship in recent times between Asia and North America than between the latter and Europe, and modern biological researches strongly emphasize the evidence. It has long been a well recog- nized fact that the plants of Greenland are remarkably distinct from those of Scandinavia, whereas the floras of Alaska and North- eastern Asia show but slight differences one to the other. The glaciation of the Ice Age also had a profound influence in modi- fying the distribution of the plants which previous to that time oc- cupied the Arctic and sub-Arctic regions. In North America, where the mountain chains extend north and south, these plants could migrate or remain undisturbed to the south of the ice sheet; whereas in the old world, where the mountain systems are largely east and west, such plants would. be cut off from any means of southward migration and would necessarily perish. «Decimation 180 of old world species would thus result in the conditions of differ- ence as seen to-day between the old world and North America.” Returning again to the subject of “ Pressures and Tensions,” the conclusion is reached that, “ Under the positive equatorial pressure opposed by the negative polar pressures, a segregation of metaspermic plants would take place,” that is, the weaker or older types of plant life would gradually find themselves crowded out in the struggle for existence. Another result which the author emphasizes is that the weaker ones are forced to fight in the front, and as an example of this principle cites the line between forest and prairie in the Minnesota valley, where he says: “It is not the characteristic grass of the prairie that grows close up to the char- acteristic tree of the forest, but between the two there is a zone of plants not perfectly established in either forest or prairie. This transitional formation * * * is generally composed of species weaker than the characteristic plants of either formation.” Under the present climatological conditions the author sssumes, just why he does not make apparent, that the equatorial pressure is increasing, while that of the poles is decreasing, and that the line of tension is thus gradually progressing towards higher lati- tudes, although liable to local fluctuations due to physical and biological causes. In effect, this is putting into a somewhat dif- ferent shape the observation of recent investigators, that there is an apparent gradual northward movement of our flora, which has been ascribed to a continuous amelioration of climate since Glacial times. The influence of this pressure is also discussed in its relation to the specialization of the structure and habitat. Thus the least specialized plants, the aquatic, occupy the least specialized habitat, whilst amongst the most highly specialized, as for instance, the epiphytic orchids in the group of Monocotyledones, occupy the most highly specialized habitat. Secondary longitudinal tensions, which are lines due to local geography, and minor tensions, due to the influence of topography in limited localities, are also discussed. Under the heading “ Outlines of Metaspermic History in the Northern Hemisphere” may be found a brief resume of what is _ known in regard to the development of the higher forms of vege- — 181 table life since Jurassic times, with special reference to the Creta- ceous or Tertiary floras which have been identified in the region under discussion. With the advent of the Ice Age of course all these were destroyed except such as could migrate or exist south- ward. The author concludes. that of all these “none showed greater capacity for variation and improvement than the ancestral forms of the modern dominant family of the Composite,” whose seeds could fly before the prevailing north winds or attach them- selves to the fur of migrating animals, and would be assisted on their return by similar influences. Necessarily the changes in soil, climate and topography would so alter the conditions that a majority of the species could not exist over the region once occu- pied by them. Others perished by the way, and most of them were modified in one direction or another in their Tertiary south- ward migration and their subsequent northward migration in recent times. At the present day the same or similar forces are at work chang- ing or modifying the distribution and structure of plants, but a new element, the influence of man, is now at work. Thus in the Minnesota valley he is responsible, according to the author, for the introduction and establishment of 130 alien forms and the exter- mination of many native ones from localities where they were once abundant. Under the statistical discussion of the facts, which occupies about 150 pages, at the close of the volume, may be found a great many interesting and often significant results and comparisons, which want of space does not permit us to review. A complete family, generic and specific index, with syno- nyms in italics, terminates the work. It could hardly be rendered more exhaustive, and may be taken as a type of what such books should be. We trust that the author has in mind a work which shall cover the Archegoniatz and that it will be carried to comple- tion in the same thorough, conscientious and progressive spirit. Fis: Monarda fistulosa—Notes on, and the Phenomenon of Fertilization in the Flowers of. Thomas Meehan, Ida A. Keller (Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila., 1892, 449-454; one plate; reprinted). 182 Monterey Bay—A Month on the Shores of. Marshall A. Howe (Erythea, i. 63-68). A contribution to the local sivélovy of the California coast with a list of about 105 species collected. Musci Americe Septentrionals, ex operibus novissimis recensiti et Methodice dispositi. WRenauld et Cardot (Rev. Bryol. xx. 1-32, 1893). This second part completes the check-list of North American mosses, with 1370 numbers. The resume at the end states that 675 are endemic; 297 occur in Europe and Siberia; 348 in Europe alone, and 12 in Siberia alone; 91 in the West Indies, Mexico, or South America, and 76 in Japan. We are sorry for the col- lector who attempts to exchange or complete his herbarium with this as a basis. We note a certain carelessness of citation, for which Macoun’s Catalogue is responsible, asin the case of 7. Hlem- mingu, Austin (not L. & J.). We had supposed H/. Bergenense, Aust. was a synonymn of #7. hygrophilum (Jur.) Sch., but we find both cited as 1230 and 1253. Nos. 1189~119I1 are credited to L. & J., not to Austin as they shoyld be, HY. Oakesi, to Schimper, not to Sullivant, and 7. Pyrenaicum, which antedates it, according to Lindberg, is ignored. In fact the whole catalogue shows that we are in need of a new American check-list, on the basis of the Rochester Code, in which some effort shall be made to sift the good from the bad, and the typography shall be less straining to the eyes than the one just printed. We shall hope to see it issued by American authors. E.G, Bs. Opening of the Buds of some Woody Plants—A. S. Hitchcock (Trans. Acad. Sci. St. Louis, vi. 133-141; four plates; re- printed). Pellea gracilis (Meehan’s Monthly, ili. 33, plate 3). Pilocereus Melocactus—K. Schumann (Monatsb. Kakteenk. iit. 30-25). Native of Brazil. NEW YORK FUNGI. The First Century is now ready for distribution, and others will follow as soon as prepared. It is intended to make these sets as complete as possible in Hymenomy- cetes. Prof. Chas. H. Peck has kindly promised to examine all species of which he is the author. It is hoped that the science of Mycology may be rendered some service by making accessible authentic specimens, and thus helping to avoid the multiplica- tion of synonyms. Price for the First Century, bound, $7.00; unbound, $6.00. For- eign subscriptions 25 cents extra for postage. Those desiring to subscribe or seeking further information, please address C. L. SHEAR, Alcove, N. Y. CHARACE/ OF AMERICA. The first fascicle of the Second Part of the Characez of America is now ready. It contains descriptions of eight species of Wited/a, as fol- lows: Witella opaca, Ag.; obtusa, Allen; montana, Allen; Blankin- shipii, Allen; Missouriensis, Allen; flexilis, Ag.; subglomerata, A. Br. ; glomerulifera, A. Br., with fourteen full-page illustrations (eight litho- graphic plates and six photogravures). These fascicles will be issued from time to time as plates can be prepared ; price of each part $1, the actual cost, if the whole edition of 500 copies be sold. Address gb pe age ee OF = 8s 10 East 36th St., N. Y. ~The North American Pyrenomycetes, By J. B. ELLIS and B. M. EVERHART. With original illustrations by. F. W. ANDERSON. 2,500 species of the old genus ““Spheria,” described and arranged in accordance with the modern ideas of classification. One thick octavo volume, with over 800 pages of printed matter and 41 full-page tinted plates illustrating the genera; bound in fine cloth, with stamped covers and gilt-lettered back. Price, $8,00, with 35 cts. additional if sent by mail. Address, J. B. ELLIS, Newfield, N. J. VIRGINIA PLANTS. During the coming spring and summer I shall collect along the south- ern boundary of Virginia, from the coast to the mountains, a region un- explored botanically, and one that will beyond a doubt yield a number of new and many rare plants. An endeavor will also be made to obtain all the new species, about a dozen in all, collected by myself and others during the past three years in adjacent territory. An effort will be made not only to keep up the standard of previous collections, but also to im- prove upon them in every way possible. Anyone desiring sets, should please address A. A. HELLER, 411 W. Wainut St., Lancaster, Pa. F. W. DEVOE & CO. ESTABLISHED 1852. OFFICES, CORNER FULTON AND WILLIAM STREETS, New York. “ ARTISTS’ - @ATERIALS. Sketching Outfits of All Kinds. Tube Colors, Water Colors, Crayons, Drawing Paper. Canvas, Brushes, Oils and Mediums. Mathematical Instruments, House Painters’ Colors. Fresco Colors. Fine Varnishes. CORRESPONDENCE INVITED. CATALOGUES OF OUR DIFFERENT DEPARTMENTS TO RESPONSIBLE PARTIES. COFFIN, DEVOE & CO, 176 RANDOLPH ST., CHICAGO. WILLIAM WALES, Fort Lee, N. J, MANUFACTURER OF FIRST-CLASS MICROSCOPE OBJECTIVES. MICROSCOPES FURNISHED OF ALL MAKES—ZENTMAYER’S AL- ; WAYS ON HAND. INSTRUMENTS ORDERED IN NEW YORK CITY SENT ON APPROVAL. DISCOUNT TO COLLEGES. BULLETIN OF THE TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB.—PLATE CXLVI. 12. oO wai : AUT TT x150 .x900- DH. Campbell. del. DEVELOPMENT OF THE SPOROCARP OF PILULARIA AMERICANA, A. BR.—DOUGLAS H. CAMPBELL, BULLETIN OF THE TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB.—PLATE CXLVII. ON THE CASTING-OFF OF THE TIPS OF TWIGS.—A. F. FOERSTE. BULLETIN OF THE TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB.—PLATE CXLVIIL. VEEN Bs NY tsc aS . ee tgs MTS fa zy, ; Fig: 15, S5 , a hy Se © g ON THE CASTING-OFF OF THE TIPS OF TWIGS.—A. F. FOERSTE. BULLETIN OF THE TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB.—PLATE CXLIX, SERENOPSIS KEMPII, HOLLICK. ~ ESTABLISHED 1851. ELMER & AMEND, MANUFACTURERS AND IMPORTERS OF Chemicals and Chemical Apparatus, oo 205, 207, 209 & 211 Third Ave,, Corner of 18th Street, : # - NEW YORK. SOLE AGENTS FOR THE UNITED STATES _ OF NORTH AMERICA, FOR Te ‘March's Sele Chemical Scone Schleicher & Schuell’s Coaniaue i f | Pure and Common F ilter Paper. 3 sDocatte C. Scheibler’s Sa > ters (Polariscopes). ae | Prof Jolly’ s Specific, Gravicy Bal ances, ete. Pee Le Brun F. Desmontes 8 Co, of Paris, Platinum. ‘ jan ae pitti Glass : a Hammered ‘Platina, eek, a ‘Weights, epee Vouk 's Burners and ‘Combu tion Furnaces, | Apparatus and Chemicals for oe Chemists. SOs PUBLICATIONS OF THE CLUB. @) TSE BULLETIN. © . This journal has been published consecutively since 1870, beginning with four pages monthly, gradually increasing, until in 1892 over 32 pages monthly with _ many full page illustrations were a The subscription price is $2 per annum. Terms for England and the Continent of Europe, to shillings. Agents for ‘England, Messrs, DuLau & Co., 37 Sohu Square, London, England. _. Back NuMBErS.—The BULLETIN was published from 1870 to 1875, inclusive, — ‘in yearly volumes, and was indexed at the end of the five years. The price of these ~ five volumes is $5.00. The numbers from 1875 to 1879, inclusive, were allowed to - yun on as one volume (Vol. VIL), and were indexed at the end of the five years. The price of this volume is $5.00. Volumes VII. to XVII. have been indexed 2 separately, and a general index to them printed in pamphlet form, which may be had e for 50 cents. The price of each is $1.00. Vols. XVIIE. and XIX. are indexed ok separately. Price, $2.00. Vol. VIII. cannot + now be ‘supplied eee but it is” siaeeh to reprint some of its eae : 2 ae “MEMOIRS. oy ae The arerevg price is fixed at $3.00 per. vohivae | in advance. T he ‘iuahese - rs can also be purchased singly and an invariable a will be fixed for each, ce re Rr Volume z contains the following papers: sees time ree No. 1.—Studies of the Types of various Speci of the Genus Carex, by Prof : sihazapege ee : s (Plates. sis te President, HON. ADDISON BROWN. ips Wace Reimar : ; _ ALLEN, M. D. ag nN THOMAS: MORONG, Ph. pet ie Secretary, : er epee ae Eprieiiaatear eae "HENRY H; RUSBY,M.D, ©. JOHN -K. SMALL, “i Roliege of Pharmacy, New York Cit ity. eg : ee - Columbia College, New York ee : Editor, SCA TE Mattes cope soe _ Treasurer, : ‘ N. J. BRITFONE PD 2 | HENRY eee - Columbia. College, New York City. Re Ga ye BULLETIN TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB. An Examination of the Seeds of some Native Orchids. By CARLTON C. CuRrTISS. (PLaATEs CL.-CLII.) During the past year some research has been made, at the Suggestion of Dr. Britton, on the seeds of the North American : Orchids to determine their structure and to note what additional characters of classification and relationship the seeds themselves might afford. The seeds are membranous, rather elongated capsules, loosely embracing an elliptical, ovate or pyriform nucellus. In organiza- tion they indicate a low type of flowering plant. The nucellus is composed of a large number of polyhedral cells, which are filled with a granular, amber-colored mass, imbedded in which is a great abundance of oily matter. The embryo is exalbuminous, and no cotyledon and radicle are formed. The Orchid seeds, therefore, are of interest as furnishing an example of the arrested stage of embryonic development. With germination the cells of the nucel- lus divide, and eventually form tuber-like buds that ultimately Sive rise to the plant. In this peculiarity the Orchid resembles many saprophytes. Especially in the structure and outward ap- pearance of its seed does it closely resemble those of several Ericacee, particularly Monotropa. The nucellus is generally an excellent illustration of the geometrical arrangement of cells in vegetable growth. Two or more confocal periclines are associated with a usually larger number of orthogonal hyperbolic trajectories. See Pogonia ophioglossoides (and fig. 17, Plate CLI.). 184 Surrounding the nucellus is the integument. Before fertiliza- tion it presents the usual form as seen in the oyules of other plants, but after fertilization it develops rapidly, assuming an in- flated sac-like form, and in the majority of species greatly ex- ceeds the nucellus in its growth. The seeds are anatropous and sessile ; and when removed from the placenta the location of the hilum is marked by an opening. This is caused by the shrinking or, possibly, by the partial absorption of the chalaza, remains of which may still be seen in the ripened seed. This leaves the in- tegument alone connected with the placenta. The free ends, therefore, lend to the seeds the appearance of an arillus, the open- ing at what seems to be the apex being due to the bending in of the cells of the inflated integument as they approach the hilum. The testa is the conspicuous feature of the seed, and with the embryo furnishes one of the family features or distinguish- ing characters of the order. It is composed of cells of varying forms, as seen in the plates. The outer margins of the cell wall are much thickened. Thus the testa presents in its outward as- pect a ribbed surface, and gives to the seed a cage-like appearance. In Pogonta ophioglossoides the so-called ribs (thickenings) do not correspond to the cell divisions, but form long bands over the length of the testa, branching and running together somewhat at either extremity, (fig. 19, Plate CLII.). The sides of the cells, as well as all the other margins, are extremely delicate and color- less. The inner face of the cell often receives an elegant sculp- turing from delicate bands that are quite characteristic of the several species in which they occur. These lines are noticeably stronger towards the base of the testa in some species, quite fading out atthe apex. This faulty development of the nucellus to- gether with the delicacy of the seed coat is doubtless the cause of the relative scarcity of Orchids. Remembering the large number of pods usually produced by each plant and that each pod: con- tains something like six thousand seeds, we realize the enormous fatality among the seeds. This is not in any way connected with a lack of fertilization. The classical work of Darwin has demon- strated the completeness of this process, were it necessary to go back to the flower to ascertain the fact. The whole appearance of the seed is that of a waif, poorly developed and insufficiently 185 protected to retain its vitality, in the extremes of our climate. It would appear that the seed is not in surroundings congenial to its nature, and has not yet been able to adapt itself to its en- vironment. This also doubtless explains the paucity of species found in the Northern United States. The seeds are beautiful objects under the microscope. Elegant in outline their beauty is enhanced by the graceful curves of the cell-margins, which often wind into fantastic figures, or build up the testa with cells of mathematical exactness. The clearness of the cell wall in some species (Listera cordata) reminds one of the valves of a diatom, while a study of the delicate markings on the inner surface of the cell, tax not a little the patience and skill of the microscopist. I have been greatly interested in the examination of specimens of the so-called Vanilla Bean, gathered in various parts of the world. The value of these pods varies greatly, dependent upon the locality in which they grow. So close is their resemblance, however, that the merchants have great difficulty in distinguish- ing them. The testa is very thick and strong. Instead of a ribbed surface the whole outer wall, save a slit-like central portion, is evenly thickened and forms a heavy plate. Save in this partic- ular and their dark reddish brown color, the seeds are identical in structure with those of our native orchids. The resemblance of the eight specimens examined is very close. With perhaps two excep- tions, the seeds would appear to belong to the same species. In the other specimens some variations were noticeable, probably due to climate. The constancy of these features as a basis of distin- guishing them would necessitate a wider comparison than I have been able to make. In examining the seeds of our Eastern orchids examples were chosen in each case that as far as possible would be typical of the species. The estimates are made upon normally developed seeds, which were not distorted by luxuriant growth or dwarfed by un- toward circumstances. I believe that a wider study of the forms will make no material change in the data presented. In all pos- sible cases comparison of fruit from widely separate localities has been made, and with rare occurrence has marked variation of the seed been manifest. Occasionally the sculpturing of the cell-wall changes, and often the variation of the cell dimensions is consid- 186 erable, so that the values given in the measurements of the cells, which are the averages of the cells taken from base to apex of about twenty specimens in every case, cannot be found applicable to all cases, but I trust that the proportion which these figures form will be found to be very constant. Such has been the experience in all cases examined. Furthermore, it should be said that having selected as carefully as possible a seed that illustrated most fully the characters of its species, it was drawn as it actually existed. No attempt has been made to introduce into the drawings the salient points of the species that were not already present. So that while some features may not be well brought out I judge that this course will result in a truer representation of the seeds and in less liability to error. Looking at the seeds as a whole, a unity of form, structure, and organization appear as constant features of family relationship. A comparison of the seeds, however, reveals wide variation and establishes relationship as told by the seeds themselves widely differing from that of the Manuals of Botany. In some instances the relative positions of genera remained unchanged. More often not only does a misplacement of genera seem manifest, but a total disarrangement of tribal relations results. By a comparison of the figures and their explanations the natural relationship of the species as based upon the seed characters at once becomes apparent. Two extreme types are manifest; the one characterized by its elongated tapering testa and elongated cells. Of this Zipularia is the type, to which stand related more or less closely, as is shown by the plates, Aplectrum and Calypso, Gyrostachys and Peramium, Cypripedium, Pogonia and Orchis. The opposing type is charac- terized by obovoid or inflated teste and shorter cells often equilat- eral. Of this Corallorhiza or Hexalectris may be taken as the type, and as related would appear Listera, Achroanthes and Liparis, Habenaria, Arethusa and Epipactis and Limodorum. The genera have been taken up in the sequence followed in the Sixth Edition of Dr. Asa Gray’s Manual of Botany, of the Northern United States. 1. ACHROANTHES, Raf. Achroanthes unifolia (Michx.) Raf. (Microstylis ophioglossoides, Nutt.) Testa obovoid, about twice as long as thick, averaging = 187 0.343 X 0.19 mm. Cells irregularly polygonal, becoming longer and narrower toward the summit, about twice as long as wide, averaging 0.047 X 0.022 mm. (Plate CL., figs. 1, 1a.) 2. Liparis, Richard. Liparis liltifolia (L.) Richard. Testa oblong, slightly narrowed at base, about three times as long as thick, averaging 0.35 X 0.12 mm. Cells regular, oblong, about three times as long as wide, averaging 0.05 X 0.017 mm. (Plate CL., fig. 2.) 3. Carypso, Salisb. Calypso bulbosa(L.) Reichenb. (Calypso borealis, Salisb.) Testa oblong, tapering towards apex, about five times as long as thick, averaging 0.59 X 0.125 mm. Cells regular, oblong, averaging 0.085 X 0.025 mm., thus over three times as long as broad. Inner cell wall finely reticulated. (Plate CL., figs. 3, 3 a.) 4. TIPULARIA, Nutt. Lipularia unifolia (Muhl.) B. S. P. (Zipularia discolor, Nutt.) Testa oblong, acute, about four and a half times as long as thick, averaging 0.534 X 0.121 mm. Cells regular, oblong, about ten times as long as wide, averaging 0.15 X 0.015 mm, Inner cell wall closely, at times loosely reticulated. (Plate CL., figs. 4, 4a.) 5. APLECTRUM, Nutt. Aplectrum spicatum (Walt.) B. S. P. (Aplectrum hiemale, Nutt.) Testa fusiform, about nine times as long as thick, averaging 1.36 *0.153mm. Cells irregularly oblong, about eight times as long as wide, averaging 0.125 X 0.0168 mm. Inner cell wall banded with delicate parallel or branching lines. (Plate CL., figs. 5, 5 a.) 6. CoRALLORHIzA, Haller. Corallorhiza innata, R.Br. Testa obovoid, about twice as long as thick, averaging 0.48 X 0.23 mm. Cells oblong, becoming polygonal at the apex, about twice as long as wide, averaging 0.069 X 0.037 mm. Inner cell-walls sparsely banded, lines very irregular and obscure. (Plate CL., figs. 6, 6a.) Corallorhiza multiflora, Nutt. Testa oblong-obovoid, about five times as long as thick, averaging 0.70 X 0.172 mm. Cells longer and narrower than in innata, about three times as long as wide, averaging 0.065 X 0.021 mm. Inner cell-wall banded with parallel sometimes anastomosing or branching lines. (Plate CL., figs. 7, 7a.) 188 7. HEXALECTRIS, Raf. flexalectris aphyllus, Raf. Testa elliptical, obtuse, about twice as long as thick, averaging 0.485 X 0.221 mm. Cells elongated, becoming polygonal towards apex, about three times as long as wide, averaging 0.065 X 0.0196 mm. Inner cell wall marked by excessively branching lines. (Plate CLI, figs. 8, 8a.) 7A. BLETIA, R. P. Lletia verecunda, Sw. Testa obovoid, about one and a half times as long as thick, averaging 0.231 X 0.171 mm. Cells poly- gonal, about one and a half times as long as broad, averaging 0.061 X 0.041 mm. Added for comparison with Hexalectris. (Plate CLI., fig. 9.) 8. LisTERA, R. Br. Listera cordata (L.) R. Br. Testa oblong-fusiform, about three and one-half times as long as thick, averaging 0.845 < 0.25 mm. Cells square or polygonal, about one and a half times as long as wide, averaging 0.032 X 0.025 mm. (Plate CLI, fig. 10.) Listera australis, Lindl. ‘Testa subrotund, about one and a half times as long as thick, averaging 0.362 X 0.20 mm. Cells poly- gonal, rather longer than broad, averaging 0.036 X 0.028 mm. (Plate CLI, fig. 11.) Listera convallarioides (Sw.) Nutt. Testa obovoid, about twice as long as thick, averaging 0.412 X 0.207 mm. Cells poly- gonal, somewhat longer than broad, averaging 0.034 X 0.026 mm. (Plate CLI., fig. 12.) g. GyRostTacuys, Persoon. Gyrostachys cernua (L.) Kuntze. (Spiranthes cernua, Richard.) Testa oblong, contracted towards apex, over four times longer than thick, averaging 0.541 X 0.112 mm. Cells regular, oblong, shorter towards apex, about seven times longer than wide, averag- ing 0.132 X 0.019 mm. Inner cell wall marked by delicate, paral- lel, subdistant lines. (Plate CLL, figs. 13, 1 3a.) 10. PERAMIUM, Salisbury. Peramium repens (L.) Salisb. (Goodyera repens, R. Br.). Testa elongated, slightly fusiform, about seven times longer than thick, averaging 0.877 X 0.123 mm. Cells square to oblong, somewhat irregular, about three times longer than broad, averaging 0.052 * 0.019 mm. (Plate CLI, fig. 14.) : 189 Peramium pubescens (L.) (Goodyera pubescens, R. Br.). Testa elongated, tapering towards apex, about ten times longer than thick, averaging 0.91 X 0.084 mm. Cells regular, elongated, about eight and a half times longer than broad, averaging 0.121 X 0.014.mm. (Plate CLL, fig. 15.) 11. Eprpactis, Hoff. Epipactis viridiflora (Hoff.) Reich. (£. Helleborine, var. viridens, A. Gray). Testa elongated, somewhat fusiform, about five times longer than thick, averaging 1.31 < 0.261 mm. Cells polygonal, becoming hexagonal towards base, about twice as long as broad, averaging 0.048 X 0.018 mm. (Plate CLI, figs. 16 and 16a.) 12. ARETHUSA, L. Arethusa bulbosa, L. Testa oblong, less than twice as long as thick, averaging 0.45 X 0.243 mm. Cells oblong to square, smaller towards base, over twice as long as wide, averaging 0.0425 X 0.0171 mm. (Plates CLI. CLII., figs. 17a and 17.) 13. LimoporuM, L. Limodorum tuberosum, L. (Calopogon pulchellus, R. Br.) Testa oblong, tapering at apex and base, about three times as long as thick, averaging 0.723 X 0.207 mm. Cells regular, oblong, about two and a half times as long as wide, averaging 0.033 X 0.014 mm. (Plate CLIL., fig. 18.) 14. PoGonta, Juss. Pogonia ophioglossoides (L.) Ker. Testa oblong, tapering at apex, ribbed by longitudinal bands that branch at base and apex, about seven times as long as thick, averaging 1.23 X 0.183 mm. Cells oblong, hexagonal, about three times longer than wide, averaging 0.0946 X 0.0298 mm. Inner cell wall banded by deli- cate lines that usually fade out above nucellus. (Plate CLIL., figs. 19, 19 a.) Pogonia trianthophorus (Sw.) B. S. P.(Pogonia pendula, Lindl.) Testa oblong, about as long as thick, averaging 0.570 X 0.197 mm. Cells oblong or polygonal, about two and a half times longer than wide, averaging 0.0525 0.0226 mm. Inner cell wall banded with branching, irregular, sub-distant lines. A variable form, sometimes longer and narrower, or with inflated summit and contracted base, having little in common with the seeds of the species of Eupogonia. (Plate CLIL., figs. 20, 20 a.) 190 Pogonia verticillata (Willd.) Nutt. Testa oblong, about six times longer than thick, averaging 1.16 X 0.176 mm. Cells ob- long, about five times longer than broad, averaging 0.110 X 0.0236 mm. (Plate CLII., fig. 21.) Pogonia affinis, Austin. Testa oblong, about six and a half times longer than thick, averaging 1.183 X 0.170 mm. Cells ob- long, about five times longer than broad, averaging 0.117 X 0.0255 mm. (Plate CLII., fig. 22.) 15. Orcuis, L. Orchis spectabilis, L. Testa oblong, slightly tapering at ends, about four and a half times longer than thick, averaging 0.57 0.12 mm. Cells regular, oblong, about five times longer than wide, averaging 0.117 X 0.022 mm. (Plate CLIL., fig. 23.) 16. HaBenariA, Willd. flabenaria ciharis (L.) R. Br. Testa oblong, about two and a half times as long as thick, averaging 0.452 X 0.18 mm. Cells oblong or polyhedral, about three times longer than wide, averag- ing 0.0496 X 0.0157 mm. (Plate CLIL., fig. 24.) 17. CYPRIPEDIUM, L. Cypripedium pubescens, Willd. Testa elongated-fusiform, about five times as long as thick, averaging 1.35 X 0.25 mm. Cells ob- long, about five times longer than wide, averaging 0.14 X 0.023 mm. (Plate CLIL., figs. 25, 25a.) In determining species the seeds are not an uncertain element. While it would not be possible to take any one seed, and from it alone locate its position, not a collection of seeds from any fruit has failed to indicate such pronounced individual characters as to render a confusion of species possible. Consider, for example, such troublesome species as Peramium repens and P. pubescens. While the generic features are pronounced in all the seeds, in each species is apparent certain individual characters that sharply separate them. The more graceful proportions and nicer fitting of cells, together with their elongation and narrowness, easily dis- tinguish Peramium pubescens. In Peramium repens the cells are shorter, often quite equilateral and intercellular spaces abound. In the species of Listera examined the same specific differences exist. In Liéstera cordata is noted a decided departure from Listera 191 australis and L. convallarioides in its elongated testa and the squareness of its cells. The relationship of Listera convallarioides and L. australis is altogether too close. Of Léstera australis but indifferent specimens were procurable, and the figure may not be typical. It is separated from convallarioides by a longer cell and less rotund testa, and the seed indicates that it is in closer relation with L. cordata than is L. convallarioides. It may be worthy of note that the seeds often appeared as in- dicative of the character or disposition of the plant. In the case of Peramium the seeds of the two species examined did not always show constant and pronounced features, and there was an obvious tendency to variation, and assumption of characters common to both. In Pogonia the reverse isto be noted. By reference to the figures it will be seen how strongly the individual features of each species are manifested. These pronounced characters indicate a decided bent in the plant life that has made a sharp demarkation of species. And we would expect to find the species widely separated and rigidly fixed, as is the fact. In the case of Pogonia affinis and Pogonia verticillata no noteworthy difference exists. The form of seed, character of cell, wall and nucellus are identical. It is to be seriously doubted if any tangible distinction can be maintained be- tween these two species. Furthermore such is the disposition of the genus that we would expect pronounced features to character- ize the species. It should be said that but one specimen, and that an excellent one, was examined. I would consider it a favor to receive mature fruit of this plant. In examining these seeds one fact came out very clearly, i. e. the importance of the fruit as one of the prime factors of classifica- tion. This would naturally be the case, for the fruit is the con- summation of the plant life. Inthe nucellus rests the occult power to produce its kind; here also is lodged the impetus to change and variation. Cliniate and soil and cultivation may assist the plant in its departure from the parent type, but that restlessness which renders the classification of some genera so difficult, is due more to the hidden force lodged by the plant in the nucellus than all other combined influences. It seems reasonable, therefore, that something of this inherent disposition of the plant that is to 192 be, ought to be manifest in the seed and so serve as a truer index to its position and relationship. And this fact, it seems to me, ap- pears with unmistakable clearness in the case of our Eastern Orchids. Explanation of Plates. PLATE CL, Fig. 1. Testa of Acroanthes unifolia X 100. : Fig. 1a. Same showing sculpturing of inner cell wall of testa be Fig. 2. Liparis liliifolia, seed \< 100. Fig. 3. Calypso bulbosa, seed < 60. Fig. 3a. Same showing sculpturing of inner cell wall of testa )< 325. Fig. 4. Tipularia unifolia, seed X< 100. Fig. 4a. Same showing sculpturing of inner cell wall of testa Be | Fig. 5. Aplectrum spicatum, seed 35- Fig. 5a. Same showing sculpturing of inner cell wall of testa < 180. Fig. 6. Corallorhiza innata, seed Sei Fig. 6a. Same showing sculpturing on inner cell wall of testa )< $26. Fig. 7. Corallorhiza multiflora, seed x Tig Fig. 7a. Same showing sculpturing of inner cell wall of testa XX 325. PLATE CLI. Fig. 8. Hexalectris aphyllus, seed > I00. Fig. 8a, Same showing sculpturing on inner cell wall of testa < 175. Fig. 9. Bletia verecunda, seed 100, Fig. 10. Listera cordata, seed < 100. Fig. 11. Listera australis, seed X 100. Fig. 12, Listera convallarioides, seed x I00. Fig. 13. Gyrostachys cernua, seed < 100. Fig. 18. Limodorum tuberosum, seed X< 100. Fig. 19. Pogonia ophioglossoides, seed x 55- Fig. 19a. Same showing sculpturing on inner cell wall of testa ~ 17%. Fig. 20. Pogonia trianthophorus, seed 100, Fig. 20a. Same showing sculpturing on inner cell wall of testa bes Fig. 21. Pogonia verticillata, seed BS. Fig. 22. Pogonia affinis, seed < 55: Fig. 23. Orchis spectabilis, seed < 60, Fig. 24. Habenaria ciliaris, seed \< 75. Fig. 25. Cypripedium pubescens, seed ae Fig. 25a. Same showing cell wall over nucellus X 100, 193 A List of the Grasses of Pennsylvania. By Tuos. C. Porter. At the request of the Pennsylvania Board of Managers for the World’s Fair, the author prepared a suite of all the grasses known to grow beyond culture within the bounds of the State, and these, mounted on card-boards, are now on exhibition in their building at Chicago. But, as no way seems to be open, through the parties who have the matter in charge, for issuing in pamphlet form for distribution a list copied from what 1s printed on the card-boards, he has deemed it his right to seek a channel in the pages of the BuLLetin for putting on record and making accessible to the pub- lic the results of his labors. The list that follows, much enlarged by additional notes, is in fact a new work. In it, the names of the counties in which the species were col- lected are given, with the names of the collectors. Wherever the latter are wanting that of the author is to be supposed. All these species thus noted can be verified by specimens in the Pennsylva- nia Herbarium of Lafayette College, either by a single one, or by several from different stations in the same county. Besides this, the Flora of Darlington, for Chester county; that of Barton, for Philadelphia, and the Catalogues of Dr. George Smith, for Delaware; of Dr. I. S. Moyer, for Bucks, and of Pro- fessors Dudley and Thurston, for Lackawanna and Luzerne, are cited in brackets. The numbers attached to the species correspond with those on the card-boards of the Chicago exhibit. 1. PAsPALUM sETACEUM, Mx.—In damp, sandy soils.—Delaware, Dr. Geo. Smith ; Chester, Porter, (Fl. Cestrica); Philadelphia ; Lancaster; Dauphin; Lebanon; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.) ; North- ampton. 2. PASPALUM Lave, Mx.—Same habitat as the preceding —Dela- ware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Lancaster ; York ; Lebanon ; Northampton. 3. Panicum FILIFORME, Linn.—Delaware (Smith’s Cat.) ; Chester (Fl. Cestrica) ; Lancaster; Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.) ; Crawford, Garber. 12. +3: 14. 15. 16. 194 PANICUM GLABRUM (Schrad.) Gaud.—Nat. from Eu. Common,— Delaware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); Northampton; Luzerne (Dudley and Thurston's Cat.); Dauphin; Lycoming, Heder; Erie, Garder. . PANICUM SANGUINALE, Linn.—Nat. from Eu. Very common throughout.—Delaware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester (Fl. Cestrica) ; Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); Northampton; Lancaster; Franklin ; Huntingdon. PANICUM XANTHOPHYsUM, Gray.—lIn the northeastern counties. Rare.—Lycoming, on “dry slate hills,” McMinn: Luzerne and Lackawanna, Dudley. . PANICUM DEPAUPERATUM, Muhl.—On dry hillsides. Frequent throughout.—Delaware; Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Lancaster ; Lebanon, Small; Bucks (Moyer's Cat.); Schuylkill; Lycom- ing, J2cMinn ; Tioga, Garber; Venango, Garber. . Panicum scopariuM, Lam.—Not common.—Lancaster; Ches- ter; Northampton, at a few stations. Panicum picHoTomum, Linn.—Common throughout. Exceed- ingly variable—Delaware; Chester; Lancaster; Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.) ; Northampton. PANICUM DICHOTOMUM, L., var. BARBULATUM (Michx.) Vasey.— Chester; Lancaster; Northampton.—Often found with the typical form. PANICUM RAMULOSUM, Michx. (?}—In woods. Frequent throughout.—Chester; Lancaster; Northampton; Carbon, Kraut ; Huntingdon. PANICUM RAMULOsUM, Michx. (?), var. viRIDE (Vasey.}—Lan- caster; Chester; Northampton.—A delicate grass, entirely glabrous, with slender culms and linear or lance-linear leaves. Growing with the typical form. Panicum WaAtteRI, Poir. (P. /atifolium of Am. authors, not of Linnzus.)—Frequent throughout.—Delaware (Smith’s Cat.) ; Chester (Fl. Cestrica) ; Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); Northampton ; Luzerne (Dudley and Thurston’s Cat.); Huntingdon ; Bedford; Small; Carbon, Kraut. Pantcum WALTERI, Poir., var. MOLLE (Vasey.)—Rare.—Bucks, H. F. Ruth ; Northampton; Luzerne (Dudley and -Thurston’s Cat.). : 17. 18. 19. 20. 22. 195 PANICUM COMMUTATUM, Schultes.—Rare.—Lancaster; North- ampton. PANICUM. SPHROCARPON, Ell_—Not common.—Chester ; Northampton; Luzerne, Heller. PANICUM UNCIPHYLLUM, Trin.—Chester, on the serpentine bar- rens south of Oxford. PANICUM CLANDESTINUM, Linn.—Delaware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Northampton; Lancaster; Franklin; Luzerne (Dudley and Thurston’s Cat.)—Frequent through- out. . PANICUM CLANDESTINUM, L., var. PEDUNCULATUM, Torr.—Phila- delphia, Dr. Jos. Leidy ; Lancaster; Chester; Franklin; Hunt- ingdon; Venango, Garver. Panicum viscipuM, Ell.—Delaware, at Tinicum, ihe H. _ Smith. 23 24. 25. 26. an. 28. 29. 30. Ais PANICUM MICROCARPON, Muhl.-\ Delaware; Charles E. Smith; Chester (FI. Cestrica); Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); Lancaster; Perry, on the shores of the Susquehanna. PANICUM CAPILLARE, Linn.—Common Hiteuchout —Delaware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester; Bucks; Lancaster; Northampton; Huntingdon. PANICUM CAPILLARE, L.., var. FLEXILE, Gattinger—Very rare. —Lancaster, in a swamp near Dillerville. The only known station in the State. PANICUM PROLIFERUM, Lam.—Not uncommon.—Delaware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Lancaster; Dauphin; Northampton. PANICUM MILIACEUM, Linn.—Fug. from Eu.—Dauphin; Lan- caster; Luzerne, Sya// and Heller. PANICUM VERRUCOsSUM, Muhl.—Very rare.—Delaware, at Tini- cum, the only station known in the State. PANicuM ANcEPS, Michx.—Not common.—Delaware (Smith's Cat.); Chester (FI. Cestrica); Lancaster; Lebanon, Smadl; Bucks, Diffenbaugh ; Lehigh; Northampton. PANICUM AGROsTOIDES, Muhl.—Common in wet places.—Dela- ware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); Lancaster; Dauphin; Northampton. Panicum vircatum, Linn.—On rocky shores. Throughout ° Ce 33. 34. 35- 36. 37: 38. 39. 40. Al. 196 the State-—Delaware (Smith's Cat.); Chester (Fl. Cestrica) ; Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); Northampton; Luzerne, Heller; Dau- phin; Huntingdon, Lowrie ; Erie, Clinton, Garber. Panicum Crus-GALut, Linn.—Nat. from Eu. .Common.—Dela- ware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester; Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.) ; Lancas- ter; Franklin; Northampton. PANICUM AMARUM, EIl., var. Minor, Vasey & Scribner.—Phila- delphia, Diffendbaugh. A plant of the coast of New Jersey, — introduced and spreading from ballast-heaps. CHAMERAPHIS VERTICILLATA(L.). (Se¢aria verticillata, Beauv.). —Adv. from Eu. Not common.—Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); Northampton ; Lancaster. CHAMRAPHIS GLAUCA(L.) Kuntze. (Setaria glauca, Beauv.).— Nat.from Eu. Common throughout.—Delaware(Smith’sCat.); . Chester; Philadelphia (Barton’s Flora); Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); Lancaster; Huntingdon, Lowrie ; Northampton. CHAMARAPHIS VIRIDIS (L.). (Setaria viridis, Beauv.).—Nat. from Eu. Very common throughout——Delaware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); North- ampton; Franklin; Lancaster. CHAM#RAPHIS Iraica(L.) Kuntze. (Seéaria Italica, Kunth).— Adv. from Eu. Escaped from. culture.—Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Northampton; Luzerne (Dudley and Thurston’s Cat); Lycom- ing, Small and Heller. CENCHRUS TRIBULOIDES, Linn.—Chester (FI. Cestrica); Dela- ware (Smith’s Cat.); Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); Luzerne (Dudley and Thurston’s Cat.); Dauphin; Lancaster; Northampton — Sandy river banks and fields. SPARTINA CYNOSUROIDES (Linn.) Willd——Not common. Rocky shores of the large rivers —Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Philadelphia, E. Diffenbaugh ; Bucks, H. F. Ruth; York; Dauphin; Alle- gheny, Knipe; Venango, Kraut; Erie, fabian. SPARTINA JUNCEA (Michx.) Willd.—A salt-marsh plant, com- mon on the New Jersey coast. Introduced upon ballast- grounds.—Philadelphia, Diffendaugh. TRIPSACUM DACTYLOIDES, Linn.—Rare and local._—Berks, near Reading, Dr. J. P. Hiester; Chester, in the Great Valley, es Cestrica); Lancaster, on the Lower Susquehanna. * 197 42. ZizANIA Aquatica, Linn.—Swampy margins of rivers.—Dela- ware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Philadelphia; Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); Lancaster, above Shock’s Mill. 43. HOMALOCENCHRUS VIRGINICUS (Willd.) Britton—Common in wet places.—Delaware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester (Fl. Cestrica) ; Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); Northampton; Lancaster; Franklin, _ Traill Green ; nee Luzerne (Dudley and Thurston’s Cat.). 44. HoMALOCENCHRUs ORYZOIDES (Linn.) Poll——Frequent through- out.—Delaware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); Luzerne (Dudley and Thurston’s Cat.); North- ampton; Lancaster. 45. ERIANTHUS ALOPECUROIDES (Linn.) Ell.—Very rare aid local.— Bucks, Burk, J. C. Martindale. 46. ANDROPOGON PROVINCIALIS, Lam., (A. furcatus, Muhl.).—Com- mon throughout.—Delaware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester (Fl. Ces- trica); Philadelphia (Barton’s Flora); Lancaster; Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.) ; Northampton; Luzerne (Dudley and Thurston’s Cat.); Huntingdon, Lowrie. 47. ANDROPOGON scopaARIUs, Michx.—Delaware (Smith’s Cat.) ; Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Philadelphia (Barton’s Fl.); Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); Northampton; Luzerne (Dudley and Thurs- ton’s Cat.); Lancaster; Dauphin; Lebanon, Sma//; Centre, Rothrock ; Blair, Becking ; Erie, Clinton—-Common over the whole State. 48. ANpRopocon Vircinicus, Linn—Not frequent.—Delaware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Philadelphia (Barton’s Fl.); Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); Lancaster; Northampton; Luzerne (Dudley and Thurston’s Cat.). 49. ANDROPOGON GLoMERATUs (Walt.), B. S. P—Rare.—Delaware, Charles E. Smith ; Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Lancaster. 50. CHRYSopoGon NuTANS (Linn.) Benth.—On rocky banks; fre- quent.—Delaware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); Northampton; Lancaster; Luzerne (Dudley and Thurston’s Cat.); Huntingdon, Backing. 50a. Sorghum HALAPENSE (Linn.) Pers. —Fugitive. Eacaped from culture.—Philadelphia, Burk. 51. PHaLaris Canarrensis, Linn.—Fug. from Eu.—Lancaster; Philadelphia, Charles E. Smith; N orthampton, Zj/er. * 198 52. PHALARIS ARUNDINACEA, Linn.—In wet places. Common throughout.—Delaware (Smith’s Cat.); Philadelphia (Barton’s F'l.); Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Lancaster; Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); Luzerne (Dudley and Thurston’s Cat.); Huntingdon, Lowrie. 53. ANTHOXANTHUM OpoRATUM, Linn.—Nat. from Eu.—Common throughout.—Delaware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Philadelphia; Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.}; Berks; Monroe; Blair, Lowrie. 54. ALOPECURUS GENICULATUS, Linn.—Fug. from Eu.—Philadel- phia, Difenbaugh.—On the ballast heaps. 55. ALOPECURUS GENICULATUS, Linn., var. ARISTULATUS (Michx.), : Munro.—Rare and local Dietneage (Smith’s Cat.); Hunting- don; Luzerne, Thurston. 56. ARISTIDA DICHOTOMA, Linn.—Common throughont.—Dela- ware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester; Lancaster; Lebanon; Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); Philadelphia (Barton’s Fl.); Northampton. 57. ARISTIDA GRACILIS, ELL.—Dry roadsides. Less common than the former.—Delaware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester (Fl. Cestrica) ; Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); Northampton; Lancaster; Franklin. 58. ARISTIDA PURPURASCENS, Poir.—Not common.—Bucks (Moy- er’s Cat.); Northampton; Lancaster; York.—On sandy river- banks. 59. STIPA AVENACEA, Linn.—Very rare and local.—Delaware; Chester, /. /. Carter; Philadelphia, Diffendaugh. 60. ORYZOPSIS MELANOCARPA, Muhl.—Frequent. In rocky woods. —Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); Philadelphia, Chas. E. Smith ; Lan- caster; Luzerne, Small and Heller; Huntingdon, Lowrie. 61. ORYZOPSIS ASPERIFOLIA, Michx.—Rare.—Monroe; Luzerne Dudley and Thurston's Cat.); Huntingdon; Blair, Lowrie; Erie, Guttenberg. 62. ORYzopPsIS JUNCEA (Michx.) B. S. P-—Very rare. In the moun- tain regions.—Monroe, near Naomi Pines; Luzerne, Rothrock. 63. Mitium erFusum, Linn.—Rare. In the northern counties.— Wayne, Garber ; Sullivan, Chas. E. Smith ; Mercer, Garber. 64. MUHLENBERGIA SOBOLIFERA (Muhl.) Trin.—Frequent through- out. In rocky woods.—Delaware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); Northampton; Lancaster ; Huntingdon, Lowrie. 199 65. MUHLENBERGIA RACEMOSA (Michx.) B.S. P.—In bogs. Not common.—Chester (Fl. Cestrica): Bucks, H. /: Ruth ; Lancas- ‘ter; Monroe; Lycoming, McMinn ; Crawford, Garber. 66, Muntensercia Mexicana (Linn.) Trin—Common through- out.—Delaware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); Northampton; Lancaster; Franklin; Hunt- ingdon ; Clearfield, McMinn. 67. MUHLENBERGIA SYLVATICA (Torr.) T. and G.—Frequent through- out—Delaware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); Lancaster; Lebanon, Small; Clearfield, Mc- Minn. 68. MUHLENBERGIA TENUIFLORA (Willd.) B. S. P—Not rare. In rocky woods.—Delaware (Smith’s Cat.) ; Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); Northampton; Huntingdon; Blair, Lowrie. 69. MUHLENBERGIA DIFFUSA, Schreb._Common throughout.—Del- aware (Smith’s Cat.) ; Chester (Fl. Cestrica) ; Bucks, (Moyer’s Cat.); Northampton; Lancaster; Blair, Becking ; Hunting- don, Lowrie. 70. MUHLENBERGIA CAPILLARIS, Kunth—Very rare—Lancaster, at Safe Harbor, the only station known in the State (Oct. 8, 1864). : 71. BRACHYELYTRUM arIsTosuM (Michx.) B. S. P.—Common throughout. In rocky woods.—Delaware (Smith’s Cat.) ; Chester (FI. Cestrica) ; Lancaster; Northampton. 72. HELEOCHLOA scHa@norpEs (Linn.) Host.—Nat. from Eu.— Philadelphia (Crypsis Virginica of Barton’s F1., I, p. 45), James, Burk, Diffenbaugh; Delaware, Dr. G. Smith; Lancaster, at Columbia, Garber. 73. PHLEUM PRATENSE, Linn.—Nat. from Eu.—Common through- out.—Lancaster, Sma//; Franklin; Northampton. 74. SPOROBOLUS ASPER (Michx.) Kunth.—Rare. On sandy river- banks.—Dauphin; Lancaster; Montgomery, Diéffenbaugh; Northampton. 75. SPOROBOLUS VAGIN&:FLORUS (Torr.) Vasey —Common through- out.—Delaware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester (Fl. Cestrica) ; Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); Lancaster; Northampton; Huntingdon; 76. 77- 78, 79. 80. 81. 82. 83. 84. 85. 200 Sporoso.us Inpicus (L.) R. Br.—From Trop. Am.—Phila- delphla, C. F. Parker —Spreading to waste places from the ballast-heaps. SPOROBOLUS HETEROLEPIS, Gray.—Very rare and local.—Lan- caster, near New Texas, /. /. Carter. The only station known. SPOROBOLUS CRYPTANDRUS (Torr.) Gray.—Erie, on Presque Isle, Garber, (Sept. 1868). AGROSTIS PERENNANS (Walt.) Tuck.—Common throughout. In damp woods.—Delaware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester (Fl. Ces- trica); Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); Luzerne (Dudley and Thurston's Cat.); Northampton; Dauphin; Lancaster; Centre, Lowrie ; Huntingdon, Becking. AGROSTIS HIEMALIS (Walt.) B. S. P—Frequent throughout.— Delaware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Bucks (Moy- er’s Cat.); Luzerne (Dudley and Thurston’s Cat.); Monroe; Lancaster. AGROSTIS CANINA, Linn.—Rare. In the mountain regions.— Northampton; Dauphin, Smal; Blair, Lowrie. AGrostTis ALBA, Linn.—Nat. from Eu. Frequent throughout. —Delaware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); Luzerne (Dudley and Thurston’s Cat.); Mon- roe; Lycoming; Huntingdon, Lowrie ; Lycoming. AGrosTis ALBA, Linn., var. VULGARIS (With.) Thurber.— Frequent throughout. Everywhere with the typical form. Northampton; Monroe. CINNA ARUNDINACEA, Linn.—Delaware (Smith’s Cat.) Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); Lackawanna (Dudley and Thurston’s Cat.); Lancaster; Northampton; Huntingdon; Blair, Backing. CINNA PENDULA, Trin.—Rather frequent on the mountains of the northern counties——Monroe; Lackawanna; Huntingdon, Garber; Blair, Lowrie. 86, CALAMAGROSTIS CANADENSIS (Michx.) Beauv.—Abundant in 87. CALAMAGROSTIS CONFINIS, Nutt.—Very rare and local—Ly- the mountain-swamps of the State-—Delaware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Bucks (7. ¥. Ruth); Northampton; Lancaster; Dauphin; Carbon; Monroe; Elk, McMinn ; Tioga, Garber; Venango, Garver; Erie, Garder. coming, in a bog near Muncy, McMinn (1865). ! 83. 89. go. Ql. 92. 93. 94. 95. 96. 97. 98. 201 CALAMAGROSTIS NUTTALLIANA, Steud.—Rather frequent in bogs and damp woods.—Delaware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester (FI. Ces- trica); Bucks, H. & Ruth; Monroe; Lancaster; Lebanon, Hel- fer; Dauphin; Huntingdon. CALAMAGROSTIS PorTERI, Gray.—Local and not common.— Huntingdon. Discovered by the author in dry woods on the hills along the Little Juniata river near Barree Forge, Aug. 12, 1862. Afterwards it was found on Warrior's Ridge, by /. &. Lowrie, near Warriorsmark in the same county. It was also reported in Prof. Dudley’s Flora as growing in Cayuga Co., N. Y. Specimens of the preceding species which sometimes has the leaves bearded below the junction of the blades with the sheath have been mistaken for it. AMMOPHILA ARENARIA (Linn.) Link.—Erie, G. W. Chinton.—A coast-plant collected on Presque Isle, the only station known in the State. AIRA PRa&cox, Linn.—Adv. from Eu. Northampton, near Bethlehem, io¢—the only known station. AIRA CARYOPHYLLEA, Linn.—Fug. from Eu.—Philadelphia, on ballast-heaps, 7. C. Martindale. DESCHAMPSIA FLEXUOSA (Linn.) Griseb—Not frequent. On rocky banks and cliffs——Lackawanna (Dudley and Thurston’s Cat.); Monroe, Knipe ; Lancaster; Franklin. Descnampsia caspirosa (Linn.) Beauv.—Very rare and local. —Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Lancaster ; Monroe, Zraill Green. Hotcus Lanatus, Linn.—Nat. from Eu. Frequent through- out.—Delaware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); Luzerne (Dudley and piprston: s Cat.); North- ampton; Lancaster. . TRisetum PenNsyLvanicum (Linn.) B.S. P—In swamps. Sparingly throughout.—Delaware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester (Fl. Cestrica) ; Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); Northampton; Dauphin; Lancaster ; Lycoming, McMinn. AVENA striata, Michx.—Very rare. A northern species.— Sullivan, Aubrey H. Smith, Chas. E. Smith; Elk, McMinn. ARRHENATHERUM ELATIUS (Linn.) Mert. and Koch.—Adv. from Eu. Rare. Found occasionally along roadsides and in woods.—Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Lancaster, Small; Recthamtn ton. 202 99. Dantuonia spicata (Linn.) Beauv.—Very common through- out. In open woods and on dry hillsides.—Delaware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); Monroe ; Lycoming, McMinn. 100. DANTHONIA CoMPRESSA, Austin.—Rare. A mountain species. —Monroe, Britton; Berks; Crawford; Lackawanna; Lycom- ing, McMinn. coro . 101. DANTHONIA SERICEA, Nutt—Lycoming, McMinn. ‘On dry slate hills.” Very rare. 102. CaprioLa Dactyton(L.) Kuntze. (Cyuodon Dactylon, Pers.). —Introduced from Europe and spreading from ballast-heaps.— Philadelphia, Dzfenbaugh; Bucks, at Bristol, Difendaugh; Bethlehem, ABechdo/t—Abundant in the South. 103. BOUTELOUA CURTIPENDULA (Michx.) A. Gray.—Rare.—Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Northampton; Lancaster; Huntingdon, Lowrie. 104. ELrusine Inpica (Linn.) Geert.—Nat. from India. Very common throughout.—Delaware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); Luzerne (Dudley and Thurs- ton’s Cat.); Northampton; Huntingdon, Low/rie. 105. Ereusine AEcyptiaca (Willd.) Pers.—Adv. from Eu.—Dela- ware, “established at some places and spreading,’ Dr. G. Smith; Philadelphia, Diffendaugh.—Spreading from ballast- heaps. - 106, SIEGLINGIA FLAVA (L.) Kuntze. (TZriodia sesleroides, Benth.).— Frequent throughout.—Delaware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); Lancaster; Northampton; Luzerne (Dudley and Thurston’s Cat.); Huntingdon. 107. TRIPLASIS PURPUREA (Walt.) Beauv.—Erie, on Presque Isle, Garber—A coast-plant. The only station known in Pennsyl- vania. 108. PHRAGMITES VULGARIS (Lam.) B. S. P.—Rare and local.—. Delaware, Dr. G. Smith ; Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Erie, on Pres- que Isle, Garver. 109. Ka:LeriA crIsTATA, Pers.—Very rare—Found only on Camp- bell’s Ledge, on the Susquehanna river above Moeanaqua (Dudley and Thurston’s Cat.), Dudley. 110. Eatonia Pennsytvanica (Spreng.) A. Gray.—Frequent — throughout.—Delaware (Smith’s Cat.) ; Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Bucks, 7. #. Ruth ; Northampton; Lancaster; Tioga, Garber. — 203 111. Earonra optusaTA (Michx.) A. Gray—Rare and local.— Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Lancaster. 112, Earonra DupLeyi, Vasey.—Rather frequent in the central mountain-region.—Lancaster; Lehigh, Garver ; Monroe, Brit- ton ; Huntingdon, Lowrie. 113. ERAGROSTIS HYPNOIDES (Lam.) B.S. P.—Common along sandy river-shores.—Franklin ; Lancaster; Bucks, H. / Ruth ; Tioga, Garber ; Huntingdon, Lowrie ; Northampton. ERAGROSTIS MINOR, Host.—Adv. from Eu. Rare—Franklin, Traill Green; Bucks. 114. ERAGROstTIS Major, Host.—Nat.from Eu. Frequent through- out.—Delaware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); Northampton; Philadelphia, Diffenbaugh ; Lancaster; Franklin; Huntingdon, Lowrie. 115. Eracrostis prtosa (Linn.) Beauv.—Nat. from Europe. Fre- quent throughout.—Delaware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester (FI. Cestrica); Monroe, Kuipe; Lancaster; Franklin, frail Green ; Fayette, Garder. 116. Eracrostis Pursuit, Schrad. Frequent in the eastern coun- ties. On sandy river-banks.——Northampton; Dauphin; Lan- caster, Heller. ; 117. EraGrostis FRAnkKu, Meyer—Rare and_local.—Chester, Canby ; Lancaster; Monroe, Knipe ; Northampton. 118. ERAGROSTIS CAPILLARIS (Linn.) Nees——Frequent through- out.—Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Delaware (Smith’s Cat.); North- ampton ; Lancaster; Huntingdon, Lowrie, Boecking. ERAGROSTIS PECTINACEA (Michx.) A. Gray—Rare. Bucks, Ll. C. Martindale. 119. ERaGRostis PECTINACEA (Michx.) A. Gray, var. SPECTABILIS, A.Gray. Frequent in the eastern counties —Delaware (Smith's Cat.); Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); North- ampton; Philadelphia, James ; Lancaster. 120. MeLica mutica, Willd—Berks, near Reading, Dr. J. P. fiester; Lancaster, at Safe Harbor.—Very rare and local. 121, UNIOLA LatiFoLIA, Michx.—Rare and local.—Lancaster, shores of the Susquehanna, Diffenbaugh, Heller. 122. UNIOLA Laxa (Linn.) B. S. P—Very rare and local.—Dela- ware, at Tinicum, Chas. E. Smith; Bedford, Aubrey H. Smith. 204 123. DisTICHLIs spicata (Linn.) Greene.—Philadelphia, Parker— From the ballast-heaps. Common on the sea-coast of New Jersey. 124. DACTYLIS GLOMERATA, Linn.—Nat. from Eu. Escaped from culture and common throughout.—Northampton. BrIzZA MAXIMA, Linn.?—Lancaster, on the roadside near ‘Smithville, Swza//—Fug. from Eu. 125. Festuca Myvurus, Linn.—Nat. from Eu.—Bucks, near Quak- ertown, Dr. J. B. Brinton—the only station known in Pennsyl- vania. Common in Southern New Jersey. 126. Poa annua, Linn.—Nat. from Eu. Common throughout— Delaware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Bucks (Moy- er’s Cat.); Luzerne (Dudley and Thurston’s Cat.); Northamp- ton; Lancaster; Huntingdon, Lowrie; Blair, Boecking. 127. PoA compressa, Linn.—Frequent throughout.—Delaware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); Luzerne (Dudley and Thurston’s Cat.); Northampton; Lan- caster; Franklin; Allegheny, Avipe. 128. Poa seERoTINA, Ehrh.—Rare and_ local.—Tioga, Garber; Crawford, McMinn. 129. Poa pPRATENSIS, Linn—Nat. From Eu. Very common _throughout.—Delaware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); Luzerne (Dudley and Thurston’s Cat.); Northampton; Lancaster; Franklin; Blair, Boecking; Erie, Garber. 130. Poa Triviauis, Linn.—Nat. from Eu. Frequent throughout. —Delaware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Bucks (Moy- er’s Cat.); Philadelphia, James; Northampton; Lancaster ; Centre, Boecking ; Clinton, McMinn. 131. PoA syLvEsTrRis, Gray.—Rare and local.__Bucks, Garber; Wayne, Garber; Chester, at Valley Forge, Diffenbaugh; Lan- caster. 132. POA DEBILIS, Torr.—Very rare-——Monroe, Brinton, at Naomi Pines, the only known station. 133. Poa atsopes, Gray.—Very rare.—Sullivan, on the Loyalsock, Chas. E. Smith. 134. Poa FLExuosa, Muhl.—Rare and local.—Sullivan, on the . Loyalsock, Chas. £. Smith; Lackawanna, near Moscow, Thurston ; Lancaster, Bart and Martic Townships. 205 135. PoA BREvIFOLIA, Muhl—-Not common. On rocky river- banks. Flowers early. — Delaware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Bucks, H. F. Ruth; Philadelphia, Difenbaugh ; Northampton; Lancaster; Huntingdon. 136. PANICcULARIA CANADENSIS (Michx.) Kuntze. (Glyceria Cana- densis, Trin.)—Frequent in the swamps of the mountain-re- gions.—Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); Lancas- ter; Schuylkill; Monroe; Centre. 137. PANICULARIA OBTUSA (Nutt.) Kuntze—Rare and _ local_— Clearfield, McMinn; Monroe, near Tobyhanna Mills. 138. PANICULARIA ELONGATA (Torr.) Kuntze.—Frequent along the mountain-streams of the Alleghenies—Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); Carbon; Monroe; Franklin; Tioga, Garber ; Cameron. 139. PANICULARIA NERVATA (Willd.) Kuntze-—Common through- out.—Delaware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); Luzerne (Dudley and Thurston’s Cat.); Monroe; Lancaster; Tioga, Garver; Huntingdon, Lowrie. 140, PanicuLaria PALLIDA (Eddy) Kuntze.—Rare and local.— Philadelphia, Dr. Jos. Leidy: Bucks, Fretz; Monroe; Wayne, Garber. 141. Pantcucarta Americana (Torr.) MacMillan —(Glyceria arun- dinacea, Kunth).—Not common.—Lancaster, Bart township; Bucks, H. F. Ruth; Northampton; Monroe; Tioga, Garber; Huntingdon, Lowrie; Clarion, Garber. 143. PANICULARIA FLUITANS (Linn.) Kuntze.—Frequent in shallow waters throughout the State-—Delaware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester (FI. Cestrica); Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); Franklin; Lancaster ; Northampton; Huntingdon. 144. PANICULARIA BREVIFOLIA (Muhl.). (Glyceria acutiflora, Torr.) Very rare and local.—Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); Huntingdon. 145. PUCCINELLIA DISTANS (Linn.) Parl_—Philadelphia, Diffenbaugh. A species of the sea-coast, introduced and spreading from the heaps of ballast. 145. Festuca ocrortora, Walt. (7. senella, Willd.).—Not common. In dry soils——Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); Northampton ; Lancaster; Huntingdon, Lowrie; Erie, Garber. 146. Festuca purtuscuta, Linn.—Nat. from Eu. Rare—Bucks 206 (Moyer’s Cat.); Northampton, /iot, Garber; Chester, Burk; Erie, Garver. 147. Festuca ELATIOR, Linn.—Nat. from Eu. Common through- out.—Delaware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); Franklin; Northampton; Lancaster; Hunting- don, Lowrie ; Blair, Boecking. 148 FESTUCA NUTANS, Spreng.—Frequent throughout. In rocky woods.—Delaware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); Northampton; Lancaster; Huntingdon, Lowrie; Venango, Garber. 149. Bromus sEcALINUS, Linn.—Adv. from Eu. F requent throughout——Delaware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); Luzerne and Lackawanna (Dudley and Thurston’s Cat.); Northampton; Lancaster; Franklin; Hunt- ingdon, Lovie. 150. Bromus RAcEmosus, Linn.— Adv. from Eu. Common throughout—Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); Philadelphia; Lancaster; Northampton. 151. Bromus MOLus, Linn.—Fug. from Eu. Very rare.—Ches- ter, Canby. 152. Bromus Katmu, Gray.— Rare.— Northampton; Bucks, fretz; Lancaster, Small; Huntingdon, Lowrie; Venango, Garber. 153. Bromus citiatus, Linn—Common throughout. In rocky woods.—Delaware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Phila- delphia, 7. C. Martindale ; Northampton; Lancaster. 154. Bromus PurGANS, Linn.—Frequent throughout. On banks of streams. Flowers much later than B. ciiatus.—Northamp- ton; Huntingdon, Lowrie. 155. Bromus sTERILIs, Linn—Adv. from Eu. Not common.— Philadelphia, Canby, Chas. E. Smith, Northampton, at Easton. 156. Bromus TEcroruM, Linn—Adv. from Europe.—Rare— Northampton, streets of Easton. 157. LOLIUM PERENNE, Linn.—Nat. from Eu. Frequent through- out.—Delaware (Smith’s Cat.) ; Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Phila- delphia, Chas. E. Smith ; Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.) ; Northampton ; Lancaster; Franklin. 158. Lotium TEMULENTUM, Linn.—Adv. from Eu. Very rare— ee Philadelphia, Chas. E. Smith ; Northampton, near Easton. — 207 159. AGROPYRUM REPENS (Linn.) Beauv.—Nat. from Eu. Fre- quent throughout.—Delaware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester (FI. Cestrica); Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); Philadelphia ; Northampton ; Lancaster. AGROPYRUM VIoLacEuM (Horn.) Lange.—Rare and local._— Huntingdon, in the barrens near Birmingham, Miss Davis ; Venango, Garber. 160. AGRoPpyRUM CANINUM (Linn.) Roem. and Seb ery rare and local._—Monroe, near Pocono Summit. 161. Hordeum jusatum, Linn.—Fug. from Eu.—Berks, Oderly ; Philadelphia, Diffendaugh. 162. Erymus Virarinicus, Linn.—Frequent throughout.—Dela- ware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Philadelphia (Barton’s Fl.); Bucks (Moyer’s Fl.); Northampton; Lancas- ter; Franklin; Blair, Lowrie. 163. Erymus Canapensis, Linn.—Common throughout. On river- banks.—Delaware (Smith’s Cat.) ; Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Phila- delphia (Barton’s Fl.); Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); Northampton ; Lancaster; Bedford, Small. 164. Etymus CaNnapensis, Linn., var. GLAucIFoLIus,, A. Gray. Frequent on rocky banks and cliffs along rivers—Northamp- ton; Dauphin. 165. ELymus striatus, Willd—Frequent along the banks of streams. Delaware (Smith’s Cat.); Chester (Fl. Cestrica) ; Northampton; Franklin; Huntingdon. 166. Hystrix patuts, Meench. (Asprella Hystrix, Willd.). Fre- quent throughout the State.—Delaware (Smith’s Cat.) ; Chester (Fl. Cestrica); Bucks (Moyer’s Cat.); Northampton; Lancas- ter; Franklin; Luzerne, Heller; Huntingdon, Lowrie. Solidago humilis, Pursh, of the Eastern States, and its Allies. (Prates CLIII-CLV.) Solidago Virgaurea, I.. has long been regarded as native in the higher latitudes of North America, and appears as such in the Flora of Torrey and Gray. In the 5th edition of his Manual, which covers less territory, Dr. Gray admits the species, but re- stricts it to two varieties, alpina, Bigelow, and humilis (Pursh). 208 In the Synoptical Flora Bigelow’s variety alone is retained and Pursh’s humilis restored to specific rank, but with its compass so enlarged as to embrace a number of diverse and ambiguous forms, amongst which are some that cannot be distinguished from Euro- pean specimens of S. Virgaurea on the one hand, and are clearly separated, on the other, from S. humilis by their more robust habit, broader leaves and sharp-pointed involucral scales. A recent study of these perplexing goldenrods in the herbaria of Columbia College, Lafayette College and the Philadelphia Academy of Natural Sciences, and especially in the large collec- tions made during the last two or three years by Messrs. Rand and Redfield on Mount Desert Island, Maine, has led me to dis- pose of them as follows: Solidago Virgaurea, ..—In his description of the type of the species De Candolle (Prod. v. 3 38) writes: “ mire varians, sed veris. in plures species non divellenda et imo varietatibus vix inter sé satis dwersis conflata” —words that well express its behavior also on this side of the Atlantic. Specimens collected at the Willey House, Notch of the White Mountains, N. H., by Oakes, Pringle, Edwin Faxon and others, and on Willoughby Mountain, Vt., by Rusby, tally with forms brought from the Isle of Wight and Sunningdale, England, by Dr. and Mrs. Britton, whilst others collected by Dr. Morong in the mountains of New Hampshire, and on Mt. Desert Island by Rand and Redfield, are very like the varieties angustifolia, Gaud. and ericetorum, DC. of the Old World, and in their foliage approach typical S. humilis of the New. (Plate CLIITI.) Besides those already recognized, I venture to characterize ee several more varieties, peculiar to our flora. nie. Solidago Virgaurea, L., var. RaNDU, n. var. More or less” glutinous ; stems stout, erect, 1-2 ft. high, often. dark purple, puberulent, or sometimes glabrate below; radical and lower leaves obovate or oblanceolate, acute, serrate, cauline lanceolate or elliptical-lanceolate, sparingly serrate or entire, glabrous; inflor- — escence an ample branched panicle or loose virgate thyrse ; heads 3 lines or more long; outer scales of the involucre mostly ovate or lance-ovate and bluntish, sometimes almost linear and acute, inner ones oblong-linear, yellowish, with scarious margins and acute or 209 acuminate tips; achenes pubescent or nearly smooth._Named in honor of Mr. Edward L. Rand. Rather common on the mountains of Northern New Eng- land and New York; abundant on Mt. Desert Island, Me., Rand and Redfield; shores of Lake Champlain, Vt., Pringle. Passes gradually into the next. Solidago Virgaurea, 1, var. monticola. (S. puberula, Nutt., var. monticola, Porter, BULLETIN xix. 129.) Stems 3 to 12 inches high, often slender; inflorescence a short, compact or sometimes loose thryse, 2 to 4 inches long; heads 1% to 3 lines long; scales of the involucre variable, ovate and bluntish or oblong and obtuse, inner ones not elongated. Common on the highest points of Mt. Desert Island, Rand and Redfield; Mt. Kineo, Me., Porter; summit of Mt. Monad- nock (el. 3169 ft.), Deane ; Willoughby Mountain, Vt., Rusby. Solidago Virgaurea, L.,var. REDFIELDII, n. var —Very glutinous. Stems stout snd rigid, 16-18 inches high ; leaves thickish or cori- aceous ; branches of the panicle starting from half way down the stem or even from the base, strict, erect, bearing short clusters of heads in the upper bracts; heads small, 2-3 lines long; scales of the involucre short, more or less scarious. Its inflorescence is strikingly like that of S. juncea, Ait., var. vamosa, Porter and Brit- ton.—Named in honor of Mr. John H. Redfield. Western Mt. and Frenchman Camp Road, Mt. Desert Island, Me., Rand and Redfield; Summit Rock, Indian Pass, Adiron- dacks, N.Y. (el. 2600 ft.), Dr. Britton. Solidago Virgaurea, L., var. GILMANI (A. Gray). Solidago humilis, Pursh_—Stems slender, strict, minutely puber- ulent above, 4-18 inches high, the dwarf and taller ones growing together and often from the same roots, leafy; radical and lower ‘leaves narrowly oblanceolate, and attenuated downward into slightly-margined petioles, serrulate above the middle, cauline ones lance-linear, entire, acute, glabrous; inflorescence glutinous, in the dwarf forms a short raceme, in the taller ones a loose or compact, _ virgate thyrse 5-8 inches long; heads 3-4% lines high ; scales ¢ the involucre oblong-linear, obtuse, or the inner ones acutish, sometimes golden-yellow ; achenes pubescent. (Plate CLV). On the rocky shores of rivers. Onion a eae Vermont, Rob- 210 bins, Oakes ; McCall’s Ferry, on the Susquehanna, York Co., Pa., Porter; Great Falls of the Potomac, Vasey. This is the type of the species according to Dr. Gray, and it agrees with the description in Pursh’s Flora. In Northern New England and New York, and further northward and westward, in the Rocky Mountains and beyond, occur forms with broader leaves, smaller heads of flowers and shorter and more obtuse invo- lucral scales, which have been placed under S. humilis. But they vary much, and their relations to the type must be left to future investigation. The variety microcaphala, Porter (BULLETIN xix. 129), which was founded on a single specimen, proves to be on closer inspection a remarkable form of S. nemoralis, Ait. Solidago alpestris, Wald. and Kit. (S. Virgaurea, L., var. al- pestris (Koch), L. and var. alpina, Bigelow).—Alpine; stem glabrous or somewhat pubescent, 3-10 inches high, in the larger forms often bent, angular; radical leaves obovate, appressed-serrate above the middle, obtuse or acute, cauline oblanceolate or spatu- late, of equal size, or 2 or 3 of the uppermost larger, longer and spreading, narrowed toward the base, obtuse or acute, sparingly serrate, distant; inflorescence a short raceme or thyrse with clus- ters of a few heads in the axils of the long upper leaves; heads 3- 4 lines high; scales of the involucre acute; rays variable in length and breadth; achenes pubescent. (Plate CLIV.) Summits of Mt. Katahdin, Me., the White Mountains, N. H., and Mt. Marcy (5 300 ft.) and Mt. McIntyre (5100 it.) Nes At the highest elevations dwarfing obscures some of its charac- ters, but the abundance of fine specimens obtained last summer by Dr. Britton in the Adirondacks exhibits the species in its full- est development, and on comparing them with S. alpestris from the Swiss and Carpathian Alps of Europe and the Altai Moun- tains of Asia the differences are so slight that the two must be re- garded as identical. And such a conclusion ought to cause no surprise, when we consider the notable company of Old World alpines which occupy the same mountain-tops. This only adds one more to the number. From the polymorphous S. Virgaurea of Linnzus, spread over Europe at lower altitudes, the divergence is so wide that it may well be counted a good species. Koch * 211 himself was inclined to think so, as appears from his remark in the Flora Germanica (p. 341): “Varietates hic enumerate plures, ut mihi videtur, species constituunt, sed hucusque nondum satis obser- vate sunt.” Dr. Gray was inclined to connect our plant with the other European alpine variety, Camérica, but that has oblong-lanceolate leaves which are pilose on both sides. Tuos. C. PorTER. Francis Wolle, After a painful and protracted illness, Rev. Francis Wolle died at his home in Bethlehem, Pa., February roth. He was born at Jacobsburg, Northampton Co., Pa., December 17,1817. His ancestors, for two generations, were conspicuously associated with the Moravian Society, and during his long and useful life he was always prominent in Moravian church and edu- cational affairs. Although a few of his earlier years were spent in business, he soon turned his attention to teaching as his life-work, and in 1857 he became vice principal of the celebrated Moravian Seminary for Young Ladies at Bethlehem, Pa. In 1861 he be- came principal of the institution, and conducted its affairs with marked ability until 1881, when the increasing infirmities of age necessitated his seeking rest. ; | From his childhood the study of natural history was his favorite pursuit, and after his retirement from active professional work, in 1881, he devoted himself to it with more ardor than ever. He was especially known among botanists as an authority upon fresh- water algz and desmids. In 1884 he published his “ Desmids of the United States and list of Pediastrums.” The volume con- tained 1100 illustrations on 53 colored plates. This was followed in 1887 by two volumes on “ The Fresh-Water Alge of the United States, complemental to Desmids of the United States.” This work was illustrated by 117 colored plates, embracing 2300 figures. In 1891 he brought out a work upon the “ Diatomacee of the United States.” This contained 2 300 figures on 120 plates. All of the illustrations enumerated were photo-lithographs from India ink sketches made by the author. During 1892 there appeared a revised and enlarged edition of the “ Desmids of the United States.” His contributions to cryptogamic botany are recognized by 212 scientists at home and abroad as standard works of great value. The particular field of his investigations had previously been but little worked, but his labors have stimulated research in these very attractive by-paths of science. He will long be remembered by those who were his friends and correspondents, for his kindliness of heart, as well as for his conscientious care in the department of science to which he devoted the energies of his later years. C. H. Kain. A Simple Point in Nomenclature. In these later days it may be said that the “air is filled” with discussions on this perplexing subject, and we have all sorts of suggested reforms looking toward the ultimate stability of our plant-names. The Committee appointed by the American Asso- ciation will undoubtedly give us a valuable set of working rules at the approaching Madison meeting, but while they are concern- ing themselves with the weightier problems, I take the liberty of calling to their attention a very small point upon which it would perhaps be well to have an authoritative ruling. This question is: When it is desired to question either of the members of a plant- name, where shall the question mark be placed? This seems a very trivial question, but, judging from the variation in its use, it is not properly appreciated. Suppose for example that a botanist is working up a collection of plants and finds one which seems to be Ranunculus aquatilis, L., but the material is not sufficient to be positive. In a printed enumeration how will this doubt be expressed? The following forms [given as models] have all been abundantly observed: ? Ranunculus aquatilis, L.; Ranunculus ? aquatilis,L.; Ranunculus aquatilis? L.; Ranunculus aquatilis, L.?, with the further variation of placing them all in brackets. If, as is ordinarily understood, the interrogation mark questions the word which it follows, we shall clearly have a state of affairs not only contradictory but ngt contemplated in many cases. In a great majority of instances it is probable that the intention is to question the species, but such indiscriminate use of the question mark can only lead to confusion, when it is remembered that there are at least three separate and distinct things which it is some- 213 times desirable to question. These are the genus, the species, and the authority. If it was always understood that the mark cast doubt upon the word which it immediately followed, it could be used with an exactness which it does not now admit of. Is it not worth while for the committee to formulate a rule which will embody the above facts? F. H. Know ron. U.S. Nationat Museum, March 25, 1893. [It would seem that the interrogation mark placed as in the first and fourth of Mr. Sudworth’s models should indicate that the | author is in doubt whether he is or is not referring to the Ranun- culus aquatilis of Linnzus; placed as in the second model would indicate that doubt is thrown on Ranunculus aquatilis belonging in the genus Ranunculus, and would ordinarily only be employed in the first description of a plant. We see no particular applica- tion for the third method.—Ep. ] Further Notes on American Species of Polygonum. By Joun K. SMALL, (PLATE CLVI.) Since the publication of my Preliminary List of American Species of Polygonum in the BuLLETIN of December, 1892, I have had an opportunity to examine and study, among other collections, those of the Geological and Natural History Survey of Canada and the California Academy of Sciences. The former is rich in specimens from the territory north of the United States, and the latter is remarkably well stocked with rare and interesting Western material, as well as some of the very scarce species from the Andes of South America. The following notes and descriptions of new forms are the re- sult of some observations on the different. species recorded below. I also take occasion in this place to ask collectors, in whatever part of the country they may be, to gather all the forms of the genus under consideration that they may meet with during the coming season. POLyconum SAWATCHENSE, n. sp. Annual; more or less scurfy or papillose throughout, of a dull green color; stem erect, striate, obscurely four-angled and four-winged below the ocrez, 214 branched from the base, .6-1.5 dm. tall; leaves narrowly obovate below, almost linear above, .5—2 cm. long; .1—.4 cm. broad, sessile, with conspicuous articulations at the junctions with the ocree, acute at the apex, acuminate at the base, strongly revolute, much the same length even to the summit of the stem; mid-rib very prominent beneath and generally wing-like; ocreze funnel-form, lacerate to about the middle; in- florescence of axillary clusters extending to the very base of the stem, and bearing from one to four flowers; flowers rather large; calyx five-parted, green, only slightly lighter on the borders; style very short, three-parted, the divisions hardly perceptible; achene triquetrous, oblong, rather blunt at both ends, smooth and very glossy. -A well marked species of the Avicularia section collected by Brandegee on the Sawatch Range, Colorado. The specimens are in the Herbarium of the California Academy of Sciences. POLYGONUM PUNCTATUM, EIl., var. ECILIATUM, n. var. More robust than the species, less scurfy throughout, erect, much branched; leaves lanceolate to oblong-lanceolate, rather broad, less punc- tate than the normal form; ocrez cylindric, loose, long, strictly entire and free from bristles; the narrow racemes, as well as the upper parts of the pedicels, dark reddish-purple; achene broadly oblong, finely but plainly reticulated. Differs from the species principally in its glossy appearance, owing to the absence of the usual scurfy surface, perfectly smooth and eciliate ocrez, and the slightly narrower and more reticulated achene. The color of the flowers and racemes, though of less consequence, is very striking. Collected by Mr. Pringle in wet places, Valley of Toluca in the State of Mexico. No. 4213. POLYGONUM PERSICARIOIDES, H.B. K. This sub-tropical species heretofore so imperfectly known, has been discovered in Lower California, by Mr. Brandegee, at two localities, namely, San Jose del Cabo and Sierra de San Francisquito. It ought to be found in Southern California and the States to the east. Mr. Pringle, in his last Mexican journey, encountered a pecu- liar form of this species. The stems are several from an oblique root-stalk, simple or nearly so, leaves shorter, broader and less acute than in the normal form, and the narrow racemes fewer flowered. The habitat is given as wet meadows, Valley of Toluca, State of Mexico, No. 4218. 215 POLYGONUM HYDROPIPEROIDES, Michx., var. STRIGOSUM, Small. Very common in slow streams, swamps, etc., in the San Bernardino Valley, California, according to Mr. S. B. Parish, who has col- lected fine specimens and records its flowering season as October and November. Mr. J. W. Congdon has also gathered it at Visalia, Tulare county, California, which is some distance north of the San Bernardino Valley. The variety holds its character in every respect. As we have it now from different points east of the Mississippi River and from two localities near the Pacific coast, we may ex- pect it to be found in the future at intermediate places. P. hydropiperoides, as well as the variety strigosum, has an al- most invariable character which, it seems, has never been re- corded. The stem or branches always produce, at the distance of three-fourths of an inch or less above the angle of branching, a node with a leaf and ocrea, thus making an internode several times shorter than normal length. POLYGONUM LITTORALE, Link. Although this species has found no place in the text-books or other botanies of our country it is not uncommon. Usually, it has been confounded with either P. erectum or P. aviculare, neither of which it resembles so closely as to render such a confusion excusable. The examination of ma- terial, in different herbaria, under the above mentioned names will doubtless show that the species is not rare. I find a number of botanists, feeling that no allowence was made for this form, have left it unnamed in their collections. P. Zttorale is more woody than P. erectum and P. aviculare. It spreads out extensively, one plant often covering several square yards. Its achene is much broader | and less pointed, and also of a darker color (almost black), less re- ticulated and more shining than that of P. aviculare. Specimens in the Herbarium of the Geological Survey of Canada give us a considerable Northern extension of the range, Macoun having found it in British America at Silver City, on the Rocky Moun- tains, and on open praries near Walsh, N. W. T. PoLyGonum Ravi, Babington. For the present we will have to consider this as an introduced and naturalized plant. But as it is appearing from so many and widely separated localities it may yet Prove to be native. It grows plentifully on the coasts of Europe 216 in company with P. maritimum, with which it has always been confounded here. PP. maritimum is common to-.both Europe and America, and there is no reason why P. Rayi should not be also. It is true that this species is closely related to P. maritimum, but it can readily be distinguished by the more acute achene which protrudes farther beyond the calyx, by the longer internodes, the flat and fewer veined leaves, and the few veined ocreez. The whole plant is also less glaucous. We now have it well represented in British America, as: the following stations will indicate: sea beaches, Brackley Point, Prince Edward Island (Macoun) ; sandy beaches, Bass River, N. B. (Fowler); Jupiter River, Anticosti, P. Q.(Macoun). The most interesting locality is Qualicum, Van- couver Island (Macoun). PoLtyconum AusTIN#, Greene. The range of this once ob- scure species is gradually being brought to light. Sometime after its discovery on the sage-brush plains in Northern California by Mrs. Austin, the plant was picked up by the U. S. Geological Surveys in the Yellowstone Park, Wyoming. This specimen found its way to the National Herbarium at Washington and re- mained there undetermined. I now find that the species was discovered in British America by Dawson at South Kootanie Pass, On the Rocky Mountains, one year previous to its collec- tion in California. This specimen is preserved in the Herbarium of the Geological Survey of Canada, having been erroneously de- termined as P. zenue, var. latifolium. P. Austine is a remarkably clear species, holding the characters given to it originally by Prof. Greene (Bull. Cal. Acad. Sci. i. 212), with one minor exception. I find that often the achene at maturity slightly surpasses the calyx. Po_yconuM KeLLoccu, Greene. Before my preliminary paper on the genus was printed I had not seen Prof. Greene’s type nor a specimen of what he referred to his new species. Being - thus unable to tell exactly what he included under P. Kelloggu, I temporarily placed all forms related to P. iwzbricatum under that species. As I have lately become fully acquainted with this plant I can now map out the following geographical range for it—Washington; Shamania County (Suksdorf): Cali- fornia; Modoc county (Mrs. Austin), Lake County, Snow moun- tains (Brandegee), Donner Lake, Mariposa County, Yosemite 217 (Bolander), Placer County (Carpenter): Utah; Parley’s Park, 6500 ft. (Watson, 1062 in part), Alta Wahsatch mountains 10,000 ft. (Jones, 1105): Colorado: Bear Creek valley, near Empire, 10,000 ft. (Patterson). Thomas Hogg. Mr. Thomas Hogg, an active and highly esteemed member of the Torrey Botanical Club, died suddenly of angina pectoris, on the 30th of December, 1892. He was born in London, February 6, 1820, and came to this country with his father, Thomas Hogg, Senior, when only 9 months old. From his earliest years his natural taste for the study of plants and horticultural pursuits was fostered by his surroundings. His father was long engaged in the management of gardens and greenhouse culture before leaving England, and was all his life afterwards a successful nurseryman and florist in the city of New York. In this business he was assisted by Thomas Hogg, Junior, and his brother James, who took charge of his establishment at his death in 1855, and for many years subsequently conducted the business on their own account. Mr. Hogg was made United States Marshal in the year 1862, and in that capacity paid a visit to Japan, in which country he re- mained eight years. At the end of that period he resigned his office and returned home. Shortly after, however, he was invited by the Japanese Government to return to the Island and take office in the Custom House, which he did, spending two years more in that service. During his long sojourn in Japan, he spent much time in travelling over the Islands and studying their flora, his official position giving him unusual facilities for exploration and collection. He made a large collection of Japanese trees, shrubs and herbaceous plants, such as he thought adapted to cul- ture in our country. These he shipped to New York, many of them subsequently finding their way to England. Among those which proved to be adapted to our climate, are many of the choicest Japanese plants which ornament our gardens to-day, which he was the first to introduce. In this manner Mr. Hogg acquired that familiarity with hor- ticulture for which he was noted, and about which his advice was 218 often sought. He was a diligent reader of horticultural publica- tions, and frequently contributed articles of interest to our garden periodicals, keeping almost to the last day of his life well informed as to all the movements in floriculture in all parts of the world. After withdrawing from business, Mr. Hogg led a retired life, but lost none of his love for his favorite studies, for his leisure was spent in botanical and other scientific investigations. Much of his time was spent in visiting various libraries and florists’ estab- Ilshments in this city, and on several occasions he went abroad and visited the most celebrated botanical gardens in Europe. His last years were much broken by ill health caused by an attack of the influenza in Paris some two years since, from the effects of which he never fully recovered. In manner Mr. Hogg was grave, dignified and reserved, but he was invariably cheerful, and genial and kindly in spirit. Among congenial companions his conversation was sprightly, and often strikingly original and interesting, but his modesty was so great that few except such companions ever learned how rich were his stores of knowledge, not only upon his favorite subjects, but also upon a wide range of other topics. His conversation sparkled with hu- morous anecdotes and shrewd observations upon the various people and scenes which he had encountered in the course of his long life. Mr. Hogg was admitted to membership in the Torrey Botanical Club in 1882. In 1886 he was elected Vice President of the Club, and chosen annually to the same office until the time of his death, except during the year 1891, when he was absent in Europe. He was seldom absent from the meetings when at home, and fre- quently participated actively in the proceedings and discussions, greatly contributing to the interest of the occasion’ by his perti- nent and entertaining remarks. Tuomas Morone. Death of Dr. George Vasey. Dr. George Vasey, Botanist of the United States Department of Agriculture and Honorary Curator of the National Herbarium, died at his home in Washington, March 4, 1893, after an illness of only a few days duration, of acute peritonitis. He had been absent from his office but four days, and the news of his death 3 219 » came with almost equal suddenness to those at a distance from Washington and those intimately associated with him in his work. At the request of Dr. Vasey’s family, his friend Mr. William M. Canby has undertaken the preparation of a biographical memoir, to contain a more extended account of Dr. Vasey’s life, work, and publications; and to him have been intrusted the data requisite for its compilation. It is necessary here, therefore, to give only an outline of his career. George Vasey was born near Scarborough, England, February 28, 1822, of English parents; and in the following year was brought by them to America. His boyhood was spent in Central New York, where from his acquaintance with Dr. P. D. Knieskern, of Oriskany, he became interested at the early age of sixteen years in the study of the local flora. In 1847 he received the degree of Doctor of Medicine at Pittsfield, Massachusetts, and from 1848 to 1868 was engaged in the practice of his profession, residing during the principal part of that period in Northern Illinois. As this point in Dr, Vasey’s life his botanical knowledge, which had previously been held subsidiary to his profession of medicine, took upon itself a new character. In 1868 he accompanied Major J. W. Powell, in the position of botanist, on an exploring expedi- tion to Colorado. A second similar expedition to the same region followed during the next year; in 1870 he was placed in charge of the Museum of the Illinois Natural History Society at Bloom- ington; and in 1872 he was called to Washington as Botanist of the United States Department of Agriculture. From this time until his death his efforts were devoted earnestly and unremittingly to his work, new as a profession, but old as a cherished pursuit. The age of fifty seems late for the beginning of a scientific career. Up to that time Dr. Vasey had published only a few un- important notes, but his preparation had been long, faithful, and opportune. He now began to publish papers one by one, at first on the subject of trees, afterward principally devoted to the Graminee, His activity seemed to increase with his age, and during the last year of his life he probably produced more matter for publication than during any earlier period of equal length. The second part of the “ Grasses of the Pacific Slope” was already in the printer’s hands at the time of his death, and the manuscript 220 for the concluding brochure of his “ Monograph of the Grasses of the United States” was so near completion that it can be edited according to its author’s plan. Dr. Vasey’s principal publications are too well known to re- quire comment here, but we cannot omit a reference to the greatest and most lasting monument to his memory, the National Herbarium. To building up this great collection he devoted his most faithful energies, and the future student of American botany will give him well deserved honor for this bounteous legacy. FREDERICK VERNON COVILLE. Reviews of Foreign Literature. Les Maladies Cryptogamiques des Cereales. Par J. Loverdo, Paris, 1892. This work of 300 pages and 35 figures, treats of the fungi parasitic upon wheat, rye, maize, barley, oats, sorghum, millet, rice and buckwheat, and under each species, the enemy, in the order of history, exterior characters, botanical aspect, condi- tion of development, effect of the disease, and means of defense. Under bacteria, Bacillus Sorghi, Burl., is treated at length with figures after Kellerman. The Ustilaginee are largely considered on pages 40 to 145, ten of the Ustz/agos proper receiving treatment, three Ziletias and Urocystis occulta. The chapter upon the penetra- tion of the ustilago germ is an interesting review of the modern view established by DeBary, Brefeld and others with its important economic bearings. Less space is given to the Uredinee than the smuts, only Puccinia graminis, P. rubigo-vera, P. coronata, P. Sorght and P. purpurea being given in particular. The figures are not of the best, those after DeBary and Cavara being much better than those d’apres nature. The Ascomycetes brought to the front are Erysiphe graminis, Spherella exitralis, and, of course, the Ergot (Claviceps purpurea), over thirty pages being given to this with several of Tulasne’s cuts. A few pages are devoted to the imperfect forms of Helminthosporiums and Septorias. The practical vegetable pathologist can find in this work much to in- terest him at very small expense. B. DOH, On the Genus Myeloxylon, Brong. A. C Seward. (Ann. Bot. vii. 1-20, Pl. 1, 2.) The author gives the results obtained from a 3 221 microscopic examination of specimens of Myeloxylon from the Millstone Grit of the British Carboniferous. Similar or identical wood from other localities have been classed at different times as a palm, a fern and a cycad and have been described under the generic names Palmacites, Myelopteris, Medullosa, Stenzelia. The author’s conclusions are that the true position of Myeloxylon is in- ‘termediate between the ferns and cycads, but most closely allied to the latter. re Yay 2 Proceedings of the Club. TuEspAY EvENING, APRIL IITH, 1893. Vice-President Morong in the chair and 27 persons present. The following members were appointed to serve as the Field Committee for the season of 1893: Dr. Thos. Morong, Mr. Henry Kraemer, Rev. Geo. D. Hulst, Dr. Jeannette B. Greene, Miss L. R. Heller. Dr. H. H. Rusby and Dr. Thos. Morong were appointed dele- gates to the Council of the Scientific Alliance of New York for the year May, 1893—May, 1894, to serve with the President of the Club. The following persons were elected Active Members: Miss Susan Travers, Riverdale, New York City; Mr. Samuel Henshaw, West Brighton, Staten Island, New York; Mr. Henry A. Siebrecht, New Rochelle, New York; Prof. Fred. W. Sering- haus, 954 Eighth Ave., New York City. The following papers were then presented. By Prof. Byron D. Halsted, “Some Results with Fungicides,” illustrated by lantern slides. By Mr. John K. Small «Further Notes on American Species of Polygonum,” illustrated by specimens. The paper is published in this number of the BULLETIN. By Mr. A. A. Heller, “The United States Department of Agri- culture Expedition to Idaho in 1892,” illustrated by specimens and a map. Dr. Thos. C. Porter described his collection of the Grasses of Pennsylvania, made for the Pennsylvania State Agricultural So- ciety, for exhibition at the World’s Columbian Exhibition at Chi- cago. A list of these Grasses, giving their distribution in the State is printed in this number of the BULLETIN. 222 Dr. Britton exhibited a specimen of the base of a Horse Chest- nut tree, sculus Hippocastanum, obtained by Mr. Walter C. Kerr at Tompkinsville, Staten Island, and first described at a recent meeting of the Natural Science Association of Staten Island. The specimen showed a remarkable development of adventitious buds arising from the cambium, the wood having almost entirely decayed away. There are more than 100 of these buds on the specimen which is about one foot high and ten inches wide. The length of some of the shoots indicates that these buds have been forming for at least two years. Dr. Britton announced the death in Geneva, Switzerland, of M. Alphonse DeCandolle, an Honorary Member of the Club, and one of the most eminent botanists of the century. He alluded to M. DeCandolle’s invaluable scientific work and moved the appoint- ment of a committee to draw up a suitable minute for record in the proceedings of the Club and for transmission to his son, M. Casimir DeCandolle. The motion was seconded and carried. The Chairman appointed Dr. Britton and Dr. Rusby as such Com- mittee. Dr. Morong distributed copies of the circular of the Instruction Committee, giving the programme for the summer course in Bot- any carried on by the Committee in codperation with the College of Pharmacy of the City of New York. Turspay Eveninc, APRIL 25TH, 1893. Vice-President Morong in the chair and 43 persons present. The meeting was held on this evening instead of the following in order to give members of the Club opportunity to participate in the ceremonies attending the unveiling of the monument to John James Audubon, at the American Museum of Natural His- tory, which were conducted on Wednesday evening, April 26. Dr. Morong presented a report for the committee appointed to prepare a statement regarding the death of Mr. Thos. Hogg. This statement will be found upon another page of the BULLETIN. Mr. Cornelius Van Brunt presented the announced paper of the evening on “ Botany and Photography.” The paper reported the result of an extended series of experiments in photographing plants in flower, and was illustrated by a large number of lantern © : 223 slides, from which it was evident that the experiments had been highly successful. Many of the slides had been colored by Mrs. Van Brunt, and the accuracy and delicacy of the coloring was much admired. Index to Recent Literature Relating to American Botany. Acarocecidien und Acurodomatien—Einige neue. G. de Lagerheirm (Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Gesell. x. 611-619). Bacteria in the Dairy. H.W.Conn (5th Ann. Rep. Storrs School Agric. Exp. Sta. 106-126). Cesalpinia—The Genus. E. M. Fisher (Bot. Gaz. xviii. 121-123). Mr. Fisher has followed up the suggestion made in the But- LETIN, vol. xix. p. 345, that the species of Hoffmanseggia, so criti- cally described by him (Contr. Nat. Herb. i. No. 5), should be re- ferred to Cesalpinia, and now transfers them all to this genus. Contributions to the Life Histories of Plants. No. VIII. Thomas Meehan (Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. 1892, 366-386). This paper consists of observations on the following subjects: Luphrasia officinalis; Notes on Gaura and G2nothera: The Carpel- lary Structure of Nymphaea; On the Sexual Characters of Rhus ; Rubus Chamemorus; Dalibarda repens; On some Morpholog- ical Distinctions in the Genera of Ericaceze; Vitality of Seeds, Lysimachia atropurpurea ;. Campanula rotundifolia ; Cornus Cana- densis ; Aralia hispida; Luzula campestris; Cakile Americana; Hy- pericum ellipticum ; Trifolium hybridum ; Lathyrus maritimus ; Loni- cera cerulea,; Raphanus sativus; On the Nature of the Verruce in some Convolvulacee; Polygonum cilinode; Aster Tatarica. Contributions to Western Botany, No. 3. Marcus E. Jones (Zoe. iii. 28 3-309). Notes on a large number the species, the following described as new: Lepidium heterophyllum; Astragalus diphysus, var. latus ; A. Beckwithii, var. purpureus; A. Dodgianus; A. Ibapensis; A. Peabodianus; A. Toanus,; A. atratus, var. stenophyllus; Cymopterus Lbapensis, and Primula Broadheade. 224 Diatomacee of Minnesota, Inter-Glacial Peat. Benj. W. Thomas (Geol. and Nat. Hist. Surv. Minn. Twentieth Ann. Rept. (1891), 290-320). The discovery of diatoms in a peat bed, in Blue Earth county, Minn., interbedded between glacial clays, is described and about 100 species are listed. They are all fresh water, and with few exceptions, living species. The clays above and below the peat are of marine origin. The list is the work of H. L. Smith, and ac- companying it are a series of critical notes, which are of great value for reference and comparison. A chapter upon methods of preparation, by Dr. C. Johnston, is also appended. As Ts fungi common in 1892 in Iowa. 1. H. Pammel (Agric. Sci. Jan- uary, 1893). A long list arranged under the several orders of the most de- structive fungi of last year in Central Iowa. fungus—A_ Parasitic (Heterosporium asperatum). Geo. Massee (Am. Jour. Mic. February, 1893). ; This treats of the eterosporium as parasitic upon Similacina stellata, accompanied by a full page plate, giving details of the structure of the fungus. Grasses—Some Diseases of. W.C. Stevens (Kan. Univ. Quart. Jan- uary, 1893). The grass fungus parasites with regard to their effects are grouped: (1) as those destructive to host tissues, Puccinias as examples ; (2) those producing abnormal growths, corn smut as il- lustration ; (3) destroying the chlorophyll, and (4) those attacking the ovaries, as the ergots. Three microphotograph plates illus- trate the points made. Leguminosengattungen—Zur Kenntniss einige. P. Taubert (Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Gesell. x. 6 37-642). The genus Garugandra, Griseb, found on a tree of the Argen- tine Republic and Bolivia, is referred to Gleditschia and figured. Myxomycetes of the Miami Valley. A. P. Morgan (Jour. Cincin- nati Soc. Nat. Hist. xv., Nos. 3-4). This is the first of a series of papers; characterizes the group; lists the species with descriptions under two orders, namely: Li- 225 ceacee and Reticulariacee and records five new species with figures of them in a single plate. Phalloid—A New. A. P. Morgan (Jour. Cincinnati Soc. Nat. Hist. xv., Nos. 3 and 4). Phallogaster as a new genus is de- scribed and under it Phallogaster saccatus, Morgan, n. sp. A full page plate is given of the same. Phyllogaster saccatus—Note on. Roland Thaxter (Bot. Gaz. xviii. 117-121, one plate). Revision dér Kleineren Ranunculaceen-Gattungen Myosurus, Traut- vetteria, Hamadryas, Glaucidium, Hydrastis, Eranthis, Coptis, Anemonopsis, Actea, Cimicifuga and Xanthorrhiza—E. Huth (Engler’s Bot. Jahrb. xvi. 278-324). For a critical review of this important paper, we would refer to Prof. Greene in Erythea, i. 70. Root Tubercles of Indigenous and exotic Legumes in Virgin Soil of Northwest. H.L. Bolley (Agric. Sci. February, 1893). Twenty-one native species of Leguminosz are named as bearing tubercles, the character of the soil, usually in Dakota, being given for each host. In like manner sixteen exotic species of the same order are listed as bearing the tubercles. Non-leguminous plants as Alnus, Shepherdia and Eleagnus are mentioned as bearing nodules upon their roots. Russian Thistle and other Troublesome Weeds in the Wheat Region of Minnesota and South Dakota. L. H. Dewey (U.S. Dept. Agric., Farmer’s Bulletin No. 10 pp. 16, two plates). The “ Russian Thistle” or “Russian Cactus” is Sadsola Kali, L., var. Zragus, D.C., closely related to the saltwort of the sea- beaches, and thus neither a thistle nor a cactus. It has long been a pernicious weed in the wheat regions of Russia and became in- troduced into those of our Northwest about fifteen years ago. It has now spread over some 30,000 square miles and is the cause of much financial loss and endless trouble. Salix balsamifera, Edward L. Rand (Garden and Forest, vi. 105). Schneeflora des Pichincha. Ein Beitrag'sur Kenntniss der Nivalen __ Algen und Pilze. G. de Lagerheim (Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Gesell. X. 517-5 34, one plate). | 226 Description of new species in the genera Chlamydomonas, Ra- plidonema, and of a new genus, Se/enotilla, with a list other plants of low organization from the snows of this Equador mountain peak. Sereno Watson. George Lincoln Goodale (Proc. Amer. Acad. Arts and Sci. xxvii. 403-416). A biographical notice with portrait and a list of Dr. Watson’s published papers. Slime-molds and Club-root. A.B. Seymour (American Gardening, xiv. 160). Some Bean Diseases. 5. A. Beach (A thesis in the Botanical De- partment of Iowa Agric. College for the master’s degree). This is an extensive paper upon the Bean Pod Spot (Colleto- trichum Lindemuthianum (S. & M.} B. & C)., giving the distribution and character of the disease and its appearance upon pods, leaves, seed and seedlings. Field experiments were made with fungicides, and comparisons of results are given in the chapter closing with a bibliography of the subject. Brief mention is added of a bacterial bean blight and of the Bean Rust (Uromyces Phaseoli (Pers.) Wint). Six full page plates are given. The same matter appears as Bull. 48 of the Geneva, N. Y., Exp. Station pp. 305-333. B. D. H. Stuartia—Geo. Nicholson (Garden, xliii. 172). With a figure of Stuartia Virginica. The New Botany. Lester F. Ward (Science, xxi. 43, 44). This article is in the nature of a plea for the more systematic study of plant affinities rather than plant differences. The author urges the necessity for the study of fossil plants in order that we may understand the ancestry of our living plants and how these came to be what we now find them. The mere determination of plants, either living or fossil, is of course necessary, but in order to appreciate fully what these determinations mean, a close study of their affinities is necessary, and this can only be done by a close comparison of living and fossil forms. A. H. Contributions from the Herbarium of Columbia No, No, . Io, II, College. A Preliminary List of North American Species of Cyferus, with Descriptions of New Forms, By N. 1. Baton (i880),. bcc es 25 cents. Cerastium arvense, L., and its North American Varieties, By Arthur Hol- lick and N. L. Britton (1887). (Out of print.) Plant Notes from Temiscouata County, Canada. By J. I. Northrop (1887). (Out of print.) A List of Plants Collected by Miss Mary B. Croft at San Diego, Texas. By N. L. Britton and H. H. Rusby (1887),. ..... . +. 25 cents. New or Noteworthy North American Phanerogams. By N. L. Britton CS) OOS ee ee oe . .25cents. An Enumeration of the Plants Collected by Dr. H. H. Rusby in South America, 1886-1887. By N. L. Britton. (Twenty-three parts published ; not yet completed.) The Genus Hicoria of Rafinesque. By N. L. Britton (1888), . . . 25 cents. A Recent Discovery of Hybrid Oaks on Staten Island. By Arthur Hollick CIBSS oe ee es ee a 25 cents. A List of Plants Collected by Dr. E. A. Mearns at Fort Verde and in the Mogollon and San Francisco Mountains, Arizona, 1884-1888, By N, L. Britton. The General Floral Characters of the San Francisco and Mogollon Mountains and the Adjacent Region. By H. H. Rusby (1888),. . .. . 25 cents. Contributions to American Bryology—An Enumeration of the Mosses Col- lected by Mr. John B. Leiberg in Kootenai County, Idaho. By Elizabeth G. Britton. (Out of print.) Preliminary Notes on the North American Species of the Genus 77ssa, Adans, By N. L. Britton (1889), ........+.. . . 25 cents. The Genus £veocharis in North America. By N. L. Britton (1889), 25 cents. New or Noteworthy North American Phanerogams, II. By N. L. Britton CNBR G ss Sey he a ee eee . , @§ cents. A List of State and Local Floras of the United States and British America. By Ni 1, Betton (10003 oe Sp eo a ee $1. A Descriptive List of Species of the Genus Heuchera. By Wm. E. Wheel- Ok (8890) ee ke ee eee 25 cents. New or Noteworthy North ‘Asueslaien Phanerogams, III. By N. L. Britton (SOOO YS se pie yi. ote Se ae . . . 25 cents. The Flora of the Desert of Atacama. By Thos, Morong (1891), 25 cents. Contributions to American Bryology, II. A supplementary Enumeration of Mosses collected by Mr. John B. Leiberg in Kootenai County, Idaho. By Elizabeth G. Britton (1891), ...... ers inva 6 56 Oe No. No. as: 36. 37: Notes on North American Halorage. By Thos. Morong (1891), .25 cents, New or Noteworthy North American Phanerogams, IV. By N. L, Britton. CR er ek geek ye Notes onthe North American Species of Eriocaulez. By Thos. Morong RONOt) 3 peti oe ee a 25 cents. New or Noteworthy North American Phanerogams, V. By N. L., Britton Cena es a ee a . . 25 cents. The American Species of the Genus Anemone and the Genera which have been referred to it. By N. L. Britton ( THON oe a. vo 17 ah CODbar Review of the North American Species of the Genus Xyris. By Heinrich ins Clouse). hk, Se ga ere een Pee nine ela ies 25 cents. A Preliminary List of the Species of the Genus Aetsomia occurring in the United States and British America. By Anna M. Vail (1892), . 25 cents. A List of Species of the Genera Scirpus and Rynchospora occurring in North Americs, By N. is Britton (1809), = 25 cents. Note on a Collection of Tertiary Fossil Plants from Potosi, Bolivia. By N. te UO (NGOS, NS ree ra icra pe eh COnU The Anatomy of the Stem of Wistaria Sinensis. By Carlton C, Curtiss ISOS rr ee ay ee 25 cents. New or Noteworthy North American Phanerogams, VI. By N. L. Britton - C1892), St ere Gs is ars Gay Sst eas ea eens ene 25 cents. Ranunculus repens and its Eastern North American Allies. By N. L. WA CEBGE Ye ee a es 25 cents. A Preliminary List of American Species of Polygonum. By John K. Small. RRC ee ee ee ee re 25 cents. West Virginia Mosses. By Elizabeth G. Britton (1892), .. . . 25 cents, A New Species of Zistera, with Notes on Other Orchids. By Thos, Morong. CEOOS eos he See gs oe a ae 25 cents, The North American Species of Lespedeza. By N. L. Britton (1893) 25 cents. An Enumeration of the Plants Collected by Dr. Thos. Morong in Paraguay 1888-1890. By Thomas Morong and N. L. Britton, with the assistance of Miss Anna Murray Vail (1892-1893)... . ... 3... ... $1.50. An Examination of the Seeds of some Native Orchids, By Carlton C. Curtiss CES) se ee or eg ee ee . 25 cents. Further Notes on American Species of folygonum. By John K, Small CRBS) sks eve ele en ce ae - + + + « 25 conte. The whole series with the exception of Nos. 2, 3, 6 and ro will be supplied for $s. Copies of the Catalogue of Plants found in New Jersey (1889), by N. L. Britton, may be had for $2. Address DR. THOS. MORONG, Curator of the Herbarium, Columbia College, NEW YORE CITY. BULLETIN OF THE TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB.—PLATE CL. SEEDS OF SOME NATIVE ORCHIDS—C. C. CURTISS. oe BULLETIN OF THE TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB.—PLATE CLI 16a : SEEDS OF SOME NATIVE ORCHIDS—C, C. CURTISS. BULLETIN OF THE TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB.—PLATE CLII. SEEDS OF SOME NATIVE ORCHIDS—C. C. CURTISS. BULLETIN OF THE TORREY BOTANICALJCLUB.—PLATE CLIII. ¢ \\ NY) Yd wy Ye ay if AY WE << xy 1 fi Whi, ¥ ‘ 1/ | » &, SW Wiz 7, Ys SOLIDAGO VIRGA-AUREA, L. BULLETIN OF THE TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB.—PLATE CLIV, SOLIDAGO ALPESTRIS, W. & K. BULLETIN OF THE TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB.—PLATE CLV. SOLIDAGO HUMILIS, PURSH. _~ BULLETIN OF THE TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB.—PLATE CLVI. POLYGONUM SAWATCHENSE, SMALL, : ESTABLISHED 1851. EIMER & AMEND, . MANUFACTURERS AND IMPORTERS OF Chemicals and Chemical Apparatus, 205, 207, 209 & 211 Third Ave., Corner of 18th Street, NEW YORK. : SOLE AGENTS FOR THE psireD STATES OF NORTH AMERICA, FOR E. March’s Scline Chemical Stone Ware. Mena: ee Schleicher & Schuell’s Chemically Pure and Common Filter Paper. Doctor C. Scheibler’: S$ Saccharome- Bs ters (Polariscopes). Ne eee Prof, Jolly’s Specific Gravity, Bal f ances, etc. ene Le Bron F. Desens & hs aS (Paris; Platinum. H. "Tronesdorff” "3 CP: Chemicals. SPECIALTIES: BE ORES ‘Apparatus, ‘Normal Graduated. Glass- ware, Porcelain from the Royal Berlin and Meissen Factories, Bo he jan, and German Glassware, ‘Filter Papers, Agate N Hammered Platina, Balances and eae ree phe: PUBLICATIONS OF THE CLUB. (1) THE BULLETIN. is This journal has been published consecutively since 1870, beginning with four — pages monthly, gradually increasing, until in 1892 over 32 pages monthly with © many full page illustrations were issued. The subscription price is $2 per annum. Terms for England and the Continent of Europe, 10 shillings. Agents for _ England, Messrs. DuLau & Co., 37 Sohu Square, London, England. ae ; Back NumsBers.—The BuLietin was published from 1870 to 1875, inciediee in yearly volumes, and was indexed at the end of the five years. The price of these ” ae five volumes:is $5.00. The numbers from 1875 to 1879, inclusive, were allowed to — __run on as one volume (Vol. VI.), and were indexed at the end of the five years. The price of this volume is $5.00. Volumes VII. to XVII, have been indexed separately, and a general index to them printed in pamphlet form, which may be had for 50 cents. The price of each is $1.00. Vols. XVIII. and XIX. are indexed separately. Price, $2.00. Vol. VIII. cannot now be supplied complete, but it is ee Us planned to opie some of its ‘Pumbers. (2) THE MEMOIRS. - The subscription price is fixed at $3.00 per volume in advance. ‘The numbers by also be purchased singly and an invariable price will be fixed for each. ae _ Volume I contains the following papers : No. 1.—Studies of the Types of various Species of the Genus Coren, by Prof, ey. This cannot now be had separately. —A List of the Marine Alge hitherto coated on the oe of Jersey and Staten Island, _ by Isaac C. Martindale. Price, socents. Yo. 3.—An Enumeration of the Hepatic collected by Dr. H. H. Ri r y. 2 sonth Roomtics, with mail ac: of saad coma S Dr. Richard cd Dosis ape wae I conbans the Blloning ps papers: No. 1.—On Reserve Food Materials in Buds wand Surrounding Parts vi plates, by Professor Byron D. Halsted, Price, 50 cents. 0. 2.—Contributions to the Botany of Virginia, with, two by Murray Vail and Arthur Hollick. ee ; 0 ples, Vor. XX. “JUNE, 1808 No.6 BY LLETI De : TORREY BOTANICAL Cs A sapeecte!: JOURNAL OF BOTANY. Epitep BY N ATHAN TEL LORD BRITTON, “ANDI OTHER MEMBERS OF THE CLUB. - (CONTENTS: hiss is ‘ Notes on the Flora of Block Jslinds Ww. we pave. oF ForEIGN Lak. —Dela_ Pally vie ae oa Oe ages or cor age ce caress tok A List of Plants found on Block Island, Reise sr Monogra in July and August: W. W. Bailey and nities Ga Eee ce ep emtemiecseddes: hrs Coles: ane: iitwosk Water Sauls of the aes of 4 Brooklyn: Sith Rep Fellte ok Rais :* : = Identity of Anthracnose of the Bean and | Thos. -Morong. in Paraguay, 1888-1899; ; .. Watermelon: Byron D. Halsted oo 246 He Enumeration of the Plants collected in Bo~ _ Some New Weed Fungi: Byron D. Halsted 250 livia: by ae Bang ; Fossil Diatoms in. Additions to the New Jersey, Flora: =: © ae ne | Stevens 4 Additions to the Lainie ni Flora: a wie RU SA Ne ee ce - THE TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB. te ae ite Es rats Vice Presidents, — _ pte a ‘e 7 ~* TF) ALLEN, M.-D. : ‘THOMAS MORONG, Ph. D: i : ¢ a is - ca ; | Recording Secretary, wee PG ak avedouting Secretary - HENRY H. RUSBY, M.D, JOHN K. SMALL, — College of Pharmacy, New York City. Columbia College; New York SY, Editor, ‘Treasurer, Ay NETS BRITTON Pas ther HENRY OGDEN, ‘Columbia eis New York. City. 1x Pine Street, New York City. : Le Editors, : "EMILY L. GREGORY, Ph.D, = = ARTHUR HOLLICK, Ph. By __ANNA MURRAY VAIL, =-—=«iRBYRO HALSTED, See D. he A. HELLER. : Leister, | Librarian, Fs "JOSEPHINE 1 E. pene EFFIE A. SOUTHWORTH. s Committee on Finance, —yustus FB : POGGENBURG, - ek ae , ®, a ee we. 1. RUDKIN, = _-M. M. LE BRUN,- ae “MRS. ee “CLARKE, : = Brondway, New York City. ee a Ww. Bist Strect, ‘New York City. aan Ostia we | Library and Herbarinin Comite oe ae ghee ip JOSEPHINE. 4 ee ROGERS, — _ MILLIE TIMMERMAN, - EFFIE- A SOUTHWORTH, Rev. L. He LIGHTHIPE. BULLETIN TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB. Vol. XX. Lancaster, Pa., June 17, 1803. No. 6, Notes on the Flora of Block Island. By W. W. BAILEY. It had always been my ambition to botanize an island. I have envied Crusoe his leisure and opportunity. The possibility of compassing such a task commends it to the ambitious; one does not, as on a continent, feel appalled by the vast extent of the field. It seems a mere matter of faithful unremitting labor. The island is of peculiar construction, indeed a vast terminal moraine. There is no rock iz sifu, but only a multitudinous mass of bowlders, pebbles, sand and clay. The bowlders are of various formation, many of them erratic from a long distance. Black magnetic sand is common on the beach. Some of the springs are strongly impregnated with iron. The island, viewed from Beacon Hill, looks like a petrified sea. It presents a most surprising un- dulating surface, and almost every valley or depression holds a pond or bog. The cliffs of the south shore are very wonderful. Here we obtain a natural section and can view the strata, for rain, frost, and the action of the sea have denuded the land. I was often reminded of scenes in Nevada. The mass of the bluff is of pure clay of a pale slate color. Over this is a loose deposit of bowlders and pebbles; over these again the loam. The cliffs, if one may so call them, have weathered into most fanciful shapes; minarets, towers, pinnacles, are piled up at random. Often a huge bowlder has lost its bed- ding and been hurled into the abyss. Again, one will be noticed poised too perilously near the brink; it is a mere question of time 228 when it falls. Onthe most prominent bluff of all stands the south- east lighthouse. The keepers assured us that the sea was surely encroaching on the land. I have never seen so changeable a shore. On one day the beach would be firm, hard sand; the next a mass of rattling peb- bles. One could scarcely believe it was the same place. The bogs and pond holes had a perennial fascination for me. There are said to be some three hundred on the island, and I can well believe it. They are filled with pond lilies, and surely there is no place in the world where they are finer. Occasionally a pink one turns up. About these pond-holes grow, in the peat, a great variety of interesting plants. Two species of sundew were found, the Dyvos- era rotundifolia,and D. intermedia var. Americana. Rhexia Virginica was common. I never before saw so much of the ragged orchis _ (Habenaria lacera). Everywhere the swamp loose-strife, Decodom, _ was abundant. Here, too, could be seen quantities of /vis versico- lor, three Eviophorums, cat-tails, sedges and grasses. The prevailing shrub in the swamps was Cephalanthus occident- alis. In smaller quantities grew Rosa Carolina, and Clethra alnifolia. We found one bush only of what appeared to be lex levigata. Willows were by no means common, and no species of A/nus was seen at all. Think of growing up without a knowledge of alder- tags! Trees of any sort are extremely scarce. Those there are, appear, with rare exceptions, to have been planted. Mr. J. F. Collins and myself, however, found a few small tupeloes, Vyss@ aquatica. White poplars are the trees most cultivated. I saw _ besides a few Adanthus trees and locusts. Protected apple- — orchards do well. I found also one lone and stunted hickory. _ There is no sign anywhere of a conifer. Here and there one — : meets with good clumps of bayberry (MJyrica cerifera), but Comp- — tonia was not seen at all. On the whole the flora, considering the situation, seemed tO — me very rich. We identified 294 species of plants and have some dozen or more things yet to determine. Then, too, the early — season no doubt would reveal many things, while we lost nearly — all the Asters; I think there are probably six or eight of these. — The region might well be mapped out into districts, as, of the 229 bogs, the many fresh ponds, the Great Salt Pond, the meadows, the cliffs, and.the shore. One might, indeed, include another province, in the range: of the Alga, these, however, from the changeable nature of the shore, are not.so abundant as. in many places along our coasts. Still we found glorious specimens of Ascophyllum, Fucus, and Laminaria. Near the beach, of course, one finds Avagallis arvensis, a cos- mopolitan plant. Here, too, are Cakile edentula ; the curious sea- sand-wort, Arenaria peploides ; sow thistle,. Sonchus asper ; Sueda, Salsola,and Solidago sempervirens. The last grows magnificently, but was hardly in flower even when I left. I found in‘all seven species of golden-rod on the island, as will be seen by the ap- pended list. Solidago lanceolata is, I think, the commonest weed on the island. It covers whole pastures and fringes every road. In some places the S. Caroliniana was about as common. We noticed quite a difference in the time of flowering of the two species, the last preceding the S. /anceolata by perhaps a week. There is the usual host of weeds, among which the wild carrot is preéminently first. Chrysanthemum Leucanthemum, is a good second. Now and then one meets with a clump of Rudbeckid hirta. \t is misnamed “ox-eye” throughout Rhode Island. There were four species of thistle, the Canada” being well to the front. My habit was to jot down in a note book, as I walked, what- ever plants I saw, the walk being mainly for the special purpose of discovery. I also collected somewhat. For one week, long to be remembered by us both, I had the assistance of my young friend, Mr. J. F. Collins, of Providence. Incidentally we observed the butterflies, finding, to our surprise, a large number of specimens of Janonia cenia. Hitherto it has been only sporadically found in the State. The abundance of Papilio Asterias is explained from the prevalence of Umbelliferz. The carrot and Siwm cicutefolium are everywhere. Nothing um- belliferous probably ever escapes the larva of Asterias, though I never happened to see it on Discopleura, so frequent here. Danais Archippus had found out that Asclepias Syriaca was here and hung his green and gold chrysalis on the leaves. Among the plants new to Rhode Island, we found Potamogeton 230 pulcher, and Gaylussacia dumosa, var. hirtella, There are seven ferns on our list,among them Woodwardia areolata. Although we found only its barren frond, we feel quite sure that no Oxoclea de- ceived us. The two can be discriminated when placed side by side; we saw no Preris aguilina. There were several Eguisetums, and a number of mosses and lichens. Nota single plant of the lily family presented itself. This seems peculiar. One might at least expect some Smilacina. Among the orchids, besides the “ragged” already mentioned, we had Gyrostachys precox, G. sim- plex and G. gracilis. I have spoken of the total absence of Liliacez. It is curious to notice this non-appearance of the commonest plants of the main land. Thus, there were no Lespedezas, Mcibomias, nor Baptistas. Not a specimen of Hibiscus Moscheutos was seen, nor any of the gentians, nor Sadéatias ; Gentianacee are represented by Lim- nanthemum and Menyanthes. Elatine Americana was abundant in and around Sands, Pond. Sagina procumbens formed verdant clumps about the little springs on the cliffs. Linum striatum was abundant in the swamps. I saw no true Geranium, but the family Geraniacee was represented by Oxalis corniculata var. stricta, and by /mpatiens biflora. Ampelopsis quinquefolia was so uncommon as to be called rare. Rhus radicans, while not so common as on the mainland, was far too abundant. Rhus venenata was not seen at all, though many localities seemed favorable for it. Polygala poly- gama, and P. viridescens were common. There were no Lupines nor Cassias, but Lathyrus maritimus throve on the southern cliffs, and we found also the genera Phaseolus, Medicago and Trifolium. Among the clovers was Ziifolium hybridum, now seen everywhere in New England. Rosacee were represented by Spirea tomentosa and S. salict- folia, Prunus maritima, several species of Rubus, Fragaria vesca, the usual weedy Potentillas, and Rosa Carolina. The last formed quite abundant copses. We saw no Saxifragacez, which seems a little — odd. I expected Parnassia at least. Myriophyllum pinnatum, was found in especially fine condition. Among Composite was the camphor-weed, Pluchea camphorata, growing with unusual vigor. To me it smells of anything but camphor. I was surprised to find — Cichorium Intybus well established. As a rule, it is somewhat — 231 local in Rhode Island, and does not make itself at home as in Eastern Massachussetts. It is, with its large, deep-blue heads, a highly ornamental nuisance. I saw but one Lobelia, the common Indian tobacco, L. inflata. Among Primulacez I was glad to find a fine bed of Samolus. It grows in the sand near the Great Salt Pond. The Labiatze were represented by eleven genera and thirteen species—a good showing—among them was Melissa officinalis. Polygonum was another genus with full ranks. We recorded eight species. The surprising height of some plants was noticeable; thus some Sparganiums and Sagittarias were the giants of their race. I havea list of 28 grasses, and am sure that a number more might be found. Both Mr. Collins and .myself rigorously excluded everything from our catalogue of which we had any lingering doubt. I found myself speculating much, and perhaps wildly, as to the origin and remote history of these insular plants. How came they here? Are they in some cases descendants of old conti- nental forms existing while yet Block Island was part of the main- land? On the other hand, did birds, winds, tide-currents, or the operations of man introduce them? Of course we can account for the presence of grasses and weeds. But how about the endemic Species? The flora seems to me pretty full for the situation. Those who consult the following list will be struck by its length and by the curious lacune. A List of Plants found on Block Island, R.!., in July and August. By W. W. BAILEY AND J. F. CoLvins. (From July 19th to end of August, 1892.) RANUNCULACE&. 1. Ranunculus Cyméalaria, Pursh. Abundant about the Great Salt Pond,Aug. 2, Ranunculus repens, L. 3. Ranunculus acris, L. NYMPH AACE. 4. Castalia odorata (Dryand.) Woody. and Wood. Extremely abundant in nearly all the numerous fresh water ponds. Flowers in some instances measur- ing from 7 to 9 inches in diameter. Occasionally pink. 5- Vymphea advena (Soland.), Greene. Quite common. te o 8 232 CRUCIFER#., . Alyssum maritimum, L. About yards. Barely Escaped. . Nasturtium officinale, R. Br. Abundant about springs. East side. . Stsymbrium officinale (L.) Scop. Brassica Sinapistrum, Boiss, . Brassica alba (L.) Boiss. Brassica nigra (L.) Koch. Brassica campestris, L. Bursa pastoris (L.) Weber. Lepidium Virginicum, L. . Cakile edentula (Bigel.) Hook. Very common on sea beaches. . Raphanus Raphanistrum, L. CISTACE, . Helianthemum majus (L.) B.S. P. VIOLACEA, Viola obligua, Hill. . Viola sagittata, Ait. Viola primulefolia, L. Viola lanceolata, L. The violets were, of course, all out of flower. CARYOPHYLLACEA, . Dianthus Armeria, L. Saponaria officinalis, L. . Arenaria serpyllifolia, L. . Arenaria peploides,L. In occasional large patches on the beaches. . Alsine media, L. . Cerastium vulgatum, L. . Sagina procumbens, L. Springs on south cliffs. . Tissa rubra (L.) Britton. Tissa marina (1.) Britton. . Spergula arvensis, L. PORTULACACE., Portulaca oleracea, L. ELATINACEA, Elatine Americana (Pursh.) Arn. Borders of Sands Pond. Common. ~ HYPERICACE, Hypericum perforatum, L. . Hypericum maculatum, Walt. . Hypericum mutilum, L. . Hypericum gentianoides (L.) B.S. P. . Llodes Virginica (L.) Nutt. - MALVACEA, Malva rotundifolia, L. Abutilon Avicenne, Gertn. 233 LINACEA. 41. Linum striatum, Walt, Very common in the bogs. July. 42, Linum usitatissimum, L. GERANIE, 43. Oxalis coruiculata, L., Var. stricta (L.) Sav. 44. Impatiens biflora, Walt. ILICINE. 45. Ulex levigata (Pursh.) A. Gray. VITACEA, 46. Vitis Labrusca, L. 47. Ampelopsis quinguefolia (L.) Michx. Quite rare. ANACARDIACE, 48. Rhus copallina, L. 49. Rhus radicans, L. POLYGALACE/, 50. Polygala viridescens, L. 51. Polygala polygama, Walt. LEGUMINOS. 52. Trifolium arvense, L. 53. Trifolium pratense, L. 54. Trifolium repens, L. 55. Trifolium hybridum, L. 56. Melilotus alba, Lam. 57: Medicago sativa, L. Scarce. 58. Robinia pseudacacia, L. Occasional about houses. 59. Lathyrus maritimus (L.) Bigel. Common on the beaches and bluffs. 60. Apios tuberosa, Moench, Occasional. 61. Phaseolus helvolus, L. Occasional. ROSACEA, 62. Prunus maritima, Wang. Common. 63. Prunus Virginiana, L. A few specimens only. 64. Spirea salicifolia, L. Occasional. 65. Spire@a tomentosa, L. Occasional. 66. Rudus occidentalis, L. 67. Rubus villosus, Ait, 68. Rubus Canadensis, L. 69. Rubus hispidus, L. 70. Fragaria vesca, L. Common. 71. Potentilla Norvegica, L. 72. Potentilla argentea, L. 73- Potentilla Canadensis, L. 74. Rosa Carolina, L. 75. Rosa lucida, Ehrh. 76. Pyrus arbutifolia (L.) L. f. Rare. 77- 78. 79: 80. 81. 82. 107. 234 DROSERACE. Drosera rotundifolia, L. Very common. Drosera intermedia, Hayne, Var. Americana, D.C. Very common, HALORAGE#. Myriophyllum pinnatum (Walt.) B.S. P. Common. Proserpinaca palustris, L. Common. Callitriche verna, L. MELASTOMACE&, Rhexia Virginica, L. Very common. LYTHRACEA. . Decodon verticillatus (L.) Ell. Very abundant. ONAGRACEAE, Ludwigia palustris (L.) Ell. Common. . Epilobium lineare, Muhl. . LE pilobium coloratum, Muhl. . Epilobium adenocaulon, Haussk. The most common species. . Anothera biennis, L. FICOIDE. . Mollugo verticillata, L. UMBELLIFER, . Daucus Carota, L. The most common weed, . Heracleum lanatum, Michx. Southern cliffs. . Stumm cicutaefolium, Gmelin. Very abundant. Cicuta maculata, L. Occasional. Discopleura capillacea, D.C. Very abundant. CORNACEA, . Nyssa aquatica, L, A very few scattered trees in a sheltered valley. CAPR IFOLIACEA:. Sambucus Canadensis, L. Rather frequent. Viburnum molle, Michx. A few specimens only. RUBIACEA. Cephalanthus occidentalis, L. Filling most of the pond holes. Galium trifidum, L. Common. COMPOSIT, . Eupatorium teucriifolium, Willd. LEupatorium perfoliatum, L. Solidago sempervirens, L. Solidago rugosa, Mill. Solidago juncea, Ait. Solidago Canadensis, L. Solidago nemoralis, Ait. Solidago lanceolata, L, Excessively common. 235 108. Solidago Caroliniana (L.) B.S. P. Nearly as much so. 109. Aster levis, L. 110. Aster vimineus, Lam. 111. Lrigeron Canadensis, L. 112. Lrigeron ramosus (Walt.) B.S. P. 113. Pluchea camphorata (L.) D.C. Abundant and thrifty about Great Salt Pond. August. 114. Antennaria plantaginifolia (L.) Hook. 115. Anaphalis margaritacea (L.) Benth. and Hook. 116. Guaphalium obtusifolium, L. 117, Gnaphalium uliginosum, L. 118. Ambrosia artemisiefolia, L. 119. Xanthium Canadense, Mill. 120. Rudbechkia hirta, L. * 121. Helianthus tuberosus, L. Sparingly escaped. 122. Bidens frondosa, L. 123. Bidens cernua, L. 124. Bidens levis (L.) B. S. P. 125. Anthemis Cotula (L.) D.C, 126. Achillea Millefolium, L. (Pink variety common.) 127. Chrysanthemum Leucanthemum, L. Abundant. 128. Zanacetum vulgare, L. 129. Erechthites hieracifolia (L.) Raf. About Salt Pond. 130. Arctium Lappa, L. 131. Cnicus lanceolatus (L.) Hoff. 132. Cnicus horridulus, Pursh. 133. Cnicus altissimus (L.) Willd., var. discolor (Spreng.) Gray. 134. Cnicus arvensis (L.) Hoff. 135. Cichorium Intybus, L. Quite common. 136. Hieracium Gronovii, L. 137. Taraxacum officinale, Weber. 138. Lactuca Canadensis, L. 139. Lactuca spicata (Lam.) Hitche. 140. Sonchus oleraceus, L. 141. Sonchus asper (L.) Willd. Common on South cliffs. \ probable, but not surely identified. LOBELIACE, 142. Lobelia inflata, L. ERICACEA, 143. Gaylussacia dumosa (L.) Torr. & Gray, var. hirtella (Ait.) A. Gray. 144. Vaccinium macrocarpon, Ait. 145. Andromeda ligustrina (L.) Muhl. Occasional. 146. Kalmia angustifolia, L. Occasional. 147. Rhododendron viscosum (1.) Torr. Occasional. 148. Clethra alnifolia, L. Rather common. PRIMULACE. 149. Lysimachia terrestris (L.) B.S. P. Common. 150. Anagallis arvensis, L. Common, ae 151. Samolus floribundus, H. B. K. Near the Salt Pond. 174. 175. 176. 177. 178. 179. 180. 181. 182, 183. 184. 185. 186, 187. 236 ASCLEPIADACE, . Asclepias Syriaca, L. Common, GENTIANACE, Bartonia Virginica (L.) B. S. P. Menyanthes trifoliata, L, Limnanthenum lacunosum (Vent.) Gris. CONVOLVULACEA, . Convolvulus sepium, L. SOLANACE, Solanum nigrum, L. Common and thrifty. . Nicandra physatoides, Gaertn. Found in one place only. Datura Tatula, L. SCROPHULARIACE, . Verbascum Thapsus, L. . Linaria Canadensis (L.) Dumont. Linaria vulgaris, Mill. Llysanthes gratioloides (L.) Benth. Gerardia purpurea, L. . Utricularia vulgaris, L. VERBENACE, . Verbena urticefolia, L. Occasional. . Verbena hastata, L. Very common. LABIATA, . Lrichostema dichotomum, L. . Leucrium Canadense, L. . Mentha piperita, L. Mentha arvensis, L. Lycopus Virginicus, L. . Lycopus sinuatus, Ell. Pycnanthemum linifolium, Pursh. Scarce. Melissa officinalis, L. Escaped. Hedeoma pulegioides (L.) Pers. Nepeta Cataria, L. Scutellaria laterifora, L. Scutellaria galericulata, L. Brunella vulgaris, L. Leonurus Cardiaca, L. PLANTAGINACE&, Flantago major, L. Plantago Rugelii, Decaisne. Plantago lanceolata, L. Plantago Patagonica, Juss., var. aristata (Nutt.) Grey. AMARANTACEA Amarantus retroflexus, L. Amarantus albus, is 221. 237 CHENOPODIACEA. . Chenopodium album, L. . Atriplex patula, L. . Salicornia herbacea, L. . Sueda linearis (Ell.) Mog. . Salsola Kali, L. PHYTOLACCACE. . Phytolacca decandra, 1. POLYGONACE. . Rumex crispus, L. . Rumex Actosella, L. Polygonum aviculare, L. Polygonum erectum, L. . Polygonum Pennsylvanicum, L. . Lolygonum Persicaria, L. - Polygonum hydropiperoides, Michx. . Polygonum Hydropiper, L. . Polygonum sagittatum, L. Polygonum dumetorum, L,, var. scandens (L.) Gray. EUPHORBIACE#, . Euphorbia polygonifolia, L. . Euphorbia maculata, L. . Acalypha Virginica, L. URTICACE, . Humulus Lupulus, L. . Urtica dioica, L. . MYRICACE#, . Myrica cerifera, L. Hardly common. SALICACEA, Salix. Several species apparently introduced. Populus alba, L. About most houses. ORCHIDACE#., Gyrostachys precox (Walt.) Kuntze. August. Gyrostachys gracilis (Bigel.) Kuntze. August. Gyrostachys simplex (Gray) Kuntze. August. Pogonia ophioglossoides (L.) Ker. July—August. Habenaria tridentata (Willd.) Hook. Very common. July. Habenaria lacera (Michx.) R. Br. Very common. July. IRIDACE, Lris versicolor, L. Common. . Sisyrhynchium anceps, Cav. ‘ LILIACE, Smilax glauca, Walt. 238 PONTEDERIACE/. 222. Fontederia cordata, L. July, August. Very common. XYRIDACEZ. 223. Ayris Caroliniana, Walt. August. Very Common. JUNCACEZ, 224. Funcus effusus, L. 225. Funcus marginatus, Rostk. 226. Funcus tenuis, Willd. 227. Funcus bufonius, L. 228. Funcus pelocarpus, E. Meyer. 229. Funcus Canadensis, J. Gay., var. longicaudatus. Engelm. TYPHACE&. 230. Typha latifolia, L. 231. Typha angustifolia, L. 232. Sparganium eurycarpum, Engelm., 233. Sparganium simplex, Hudson. ARACEA, 234. Acorus Calamus, L. LEMNACE&, 235. Lemna minor, L. ALISMACE. 236. Sagittaria variabilis, Engelm. Common and thrifty. NAIADACE#, 237. Lotamogeton hybridus, Michx. 238. Potamogeton pulcher, Tuckerm. CYPERACE, 239. Cyperus Nuttallii, Torr. 240. Cyperus filiculmis, Vahl. 241. Cyperus dentatus, Torr. 242. Cyperus strigosus, L. 243. Dulichium spathaceum ( L.) Pers. 244. Eleocharis ovata €Willd.) R. Br. 245. Scirpus Americanus, Pers, 246. Scirpus robustus, Pursh. 247. Eriophorum cyperinum, L. 248. Eriophorum Virginicum, L. 249. Eriophorum gracile, Koch. 250. Rynchospora alba (L.) Vahl. 251. Rynchospora glomerata (L.) Vahl. 252. Carex bullata, Schk. 253. Carex lurida, Wahl. 254. Carex Pseudo-cyperus, L. var. comosa (Boott.) W. Boott. 255. Carex straminea, Willd. 239 GRAMINEA, 256. Spartina cynosuroides (L.) Willd. 257. Spartina juncea (Michx.) Willd. 258. Spartina stricta, Roth, var. g/aéra (Muhl.) Gray. 259. Paspalum setaceum, Michx. 260. Panicum sanguinale, L, 261. Panicum proliferum, Lam. 262. Panicum capillare, L. 263. Panicum vigatum, L. 264. Panicum clandestinum, L. 265. Panicum dichotomum, L, 267, Panicum Crus-Galli, L, 268. Chameraphis glauca (L.) Kuretze. 269. Cenchrus tribuloides, L. 270. Homalocenchrus oryzoides (L.) Poll. 271. Andropogon scoparius, Michx. 272. Aristida dichotoma, L. 273. Phleum pratense, L. 274. Agrostis alba, L. 275. Agrostis canina, L. 276. Ammophila arundinacea (L.) Host. 577. Holcus lanatus, L. : 278. Danthonia spicata (L.) Beauy. : 279. Lhragmites vulgaris (Lam.) B. S. P. 280. Eragrostis pectinacea (Michx.) Gray. 282. Poa annua, L. 283. Panicularia Canadensis (Michx.) Kuntze. 284. Panicularia obtusa (Nutt.) Kuntze. 285. Agropyrum repens (L.) Beauy. EQUISETACE/:. 286. Eguisetum arvense, L. FILICES. 287. Woodwardia areolata (L.) Moore. 288. Asplenium Lilix-femina (L.) Bernh, Dryopteris Thelypteris (L.) A. Gray. 290. Dryoperis Noveboracense (L.) A. Gray. 291. Onoclea Senstbtlis, L. 292. Dicksonia punctilobula (Michx.) A. Gray. 293. Osmunda cinnamomea, L. 2 LYCOPODIACE:. 294. Lycopodium inundatum, L. 240 Notes on the Rhode Island Flora. By J. F. Couuins. Since the publication of the « Plants of R. I.” in 1888, many additions have been reported to the author, Mr. Bennett, although it is safe to say there has been very little active work on our State flora since that date. Upon determining the specimens collected by me the past season I find more than 35 species among them not previously recorded as occurring in Rhode Island. Added to these an equal number detected in the two preceding years, and we have a list of 70 species (and varieties) collected by a person who has but a few hours each week to devote to botanical work. Does this not point to « Little Rhody ” as still being an interest- ing field for the local collector ? The greater part of the specimens were collected within the city limits, but little time being found in which to take trips of any length outside. Consequently, as might be expected, the wastes have yielded a large portion, many of which have not fully demonstrated their ability to persist, while of others only single plants have been found. It is my object in these brief notes to mention only some of the more interesting additions and only those collected by me either alone or in company with others. All are represented by specimens in my herbarium, and where duplicates were obtained they have usually been placed in Brown University Herbarium also. Unless otherwise noted all species were collected in this city in 1892. Nasturtium lacustre, A. Gray, 1890. Lepidium intermedium, A. Gray, with L. Virginicum and L. ruderale. Gypsophila murals, L., at one station in the southwestern por- tion of the city, where it has been slowly spreading for the past three seasons, but is still confined to a very limited area in a sandy field. Lychnis diurna, Sibth.,a peculiar form which Dr. Robinson in- forms me is known to European seedmen as Melandrium diurnum, var. crassifolium. Wastes only. Stellaria graminea, L., quite common in grassy places along road- sides, and similar situations. 1884, 1891, etc. 241 The station for Lotus corniculatus (Bot. Gaz. xvii., 229) from which only three specimens were obtained in June was obliterated soon afterwards. ‘Glycyrrhiza lepidota, Nutt., Cove Lands, J. L. Bennett, 1891; G. H. Leland and J. F. Collins, 1892. Vicia hirsuta (L.) Koch., a dozen or more specimens obtained. Leland and Collins. Astilbe Japonica, Miq., seemingly well established and spreading at one station, 1890,—’91,—’92. Lpilobium adenocaulon, Haussk., appears to have escaped detec- tion until July 9th. Since that date I have found it at sev- eral stations about the city. At suburban Elmwood it seems to be a common species, particularly on the east shore of Mashapaug pond, where no other Lpilobium was noticed. In some woods near the pond it grows with E. coloratum, Muhl. It has undoubtedly been heretofore confounded with the latter species. Scandix Pecten-veneris, L., 1890, J. F. C.; 1892, Leland and Col- lins, Symphoricarpos racemosus, Michx.; at one station for several years. Possibly an escape. Galium tricorne, With., several specimens; W. W. Bailey, Leland, Collins. Grindelia squarrosa, Dunal, and Artemisia Ludoviciana, Nutt. Growing together, abundant and apparently well established On wastes. The latter first noticed at another station while collecting with Prof. Bailey. Carduus nutans, 1.. Since 1890, G. Bailey, Bennett, Leland, Col- lins. Mentha Canadensis, L.., var. glabrata, Benth. Shore of Mashapaug Pond. Dracocephalum parvifiorum, Nutt. Oe ene A Preliminary List of the Species of etn Gents Meibomia occurring in the United States and British America. By Anna M. Vail (1892), . 25 cents. A List of Species of the Genera Scirpus and Rynchospora occurring in North Agence. De Net: Bitten (180s) ee ea 25 cents. Note on a Collection of Tertiary Fossil Plants from Potosi, Bolivia. By N. Etim CIOGE es ee ee a . 25 cents, The Anatomy of the Stem of Wistaria Stains: hi Carlten C. Curtiss (50D ka ee eee ee eae ee 25 cents. New or Noteworthy North American Phanerogams, VI. By N. L. Britton Re ek ee vn aN ne 25 cents. Ranunculus repens and its Eastern North American Allies. By N. L. SL AOGS oc oa Ok eo ag) Wo a ee 25 cents. A Preliminary List of American Species of Polygonum. By John K. Small. CTMOMI ar Rae ein Se els pee ee ee 25 cents, West Virginia Mosses. By Elizabeth G. Britton (1892), .. . . 25 cents. A New Species of Lis¢era, with Notes on Other Orchids. By Thos. Morong. OMS oS ee re en LRA ee 25 cents, The North American Species of Lesfedeza. By N, L. Britton (1893) 25 cents. An Enumeration of the Plants Collected by Dr. Thos. Morong in Paraguay 1888-1890. By Thomas Morong and N. L. Britton, with the assistance of Miss Anna Murray Vail (1892-1893)... . 09. 2 0. eee ne $1.50. An Examination of the Seeds of some Native Orehids. By Carlton C. Curtiss CDOS YO nt ee ee tes (a5 Se Further Notes on American Species of Polygonum. By John K, Small CONDENS ns ae wk ke a g Cae ee 25 cant: The whole series with the exception of Nos. 2, 3, 6 and ro will be supplied for $5. Copies of the Catalogue of Plants found in New Jersey (1889), by N. L. Britton, may be had for $2. : Address DR. THos. MORONG, Curator of the Herbarium, Columbia College, NEW YORE CRTs BULLETIN OF THE TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB.—PLATE CLVIIL. PYROLA OXYPETALA, AUSTIN. BULLETIN OF THE TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB—PLATE CLX, HARTWRIGHTIA FLORIDANA, A. GRAY. BULLETIN OF THE TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB.—PLATE CLXL wn Q DO smrshe St. ee UTRICULARIA INTERMEDIA, HAYNE. FOR SALE. bac A ZENTMAYER PORTABLE MICROSCOPE, IN PERFECT ORDER, For 3100.00. - - - Catalogue Price, $147.50. Including THREE OBJECTIVES, 1} in., $ in., and } in, Also an Abbé Condenser, Glass Stage, and Neat Walnut Case. Address the Editors of the Bulletin, °° Wm. Wales, Fort Lee, N. J. CHARACEA: OF AMERICA. The first fascicle of the Second Part of the Characeze of America is now ready. It contains descriptions of eight species of Mite//a, as fol- lows: Witella opaca, Ag.; obtusa, Allen; montana, Allen; Blankin- shipit, Allen; Missouriensis, Allen; flexilis, Ag.; subglomerata, A. Br. ; Slomerulifera, A, Br., with fourteen full-page illustrations (eight litho- graphic plates and six photogravures). These fascicles will be issued from time to time as plates can be prepared ; price of each part $1, the actual cost, if the whole edition of 500 copies be sold. Address DD. Ee. aaa, 10 East 36th St., N. Y. The North American Pyrenomycetes. By J. B. ELLIS and B. M. EVERHART. With original illustrations by F. W. ANDERSON. 2,500 species of the old genus * Spheria,” described and arranged in accordance with the modern ideas of classification. One thick octavo volume, with over 800 pages of printed matter and 41 full-page tinted plates illustrating the genera ; bound in fine cloth, with stamped covers and gilt-lettered back. Price, $8,00, with 35 cts. additional if sent by mail. Address, J. B. ELLIS, Newfield, N. J. VIRGINIA PLANTS. During the coming spring and summer I shall collect along the south- €rn boundary of Virginia, from the coast to the mountains, a region un- explored botanically, and one that will beyond a doubt yield a number of new and many rare plants. An endeavor will also be made to obtain all the new species, about a dozen in all, collected by myself and others during the past three years in adjacent territory. An effort will be made not only to keep up the standard of previous collections, but also to im- Prove upon them in every way possible. Anyone desiring sets, should please address A. A. HELLER, 411 W. Wainut St., Lancaster, Pa. F. W. DEVOE & CO. ESTABLISHED 1852. OFFICES, CORNER FULTON AND WILLIAM STREETS, New York. “€ARTISTS’ - PATERIALS _ Sketching Outfits of All Kinds. Tube Colors, Water Colors, Crayons, Drawing Paper. Canvas, Brushes, Oils and Mediums. Mathematical Instruments, House Painters’ Colors. Fresco Colors. Fine Varnishes. CORRESPONDENCE INVITED CATALOGUES OF OUR DIFFERENT DEPRTMENTS TO RESPONSIBLE PRTIES. COFFIN, DEVOE & CO, 176 RANDOLPH ST. CHICAGO. PLANTS OF PARAGUAY. ‘Two Partial Sets of my PARAGUAY PLANTS remain — tributed and are offered for sale at $10 PER HUNDRED SPECIMENS. THOMAS MORONG, COLUMBIA COLLEGE, NEw YoRK CITY. WILLIAM WALES, Fort Lee, N. J. -MANUFACTURER OF FIRST-CLASS MICROSCOPE OBJECTIVES. MICROSCOPES FURNISHED ‘OF ALL MAKES—ZENTMAYER’S AL WAYS ON HAND. INSTRUMENTS ORDERED IN NEW YORK CITY SENT ON APPROVAL. DISCOUNT TO COLLEGES. ESTABLISHED 1851. EIMER & AMEND, MANUFACTURERS AND IMPORTERS OF Chemicals and Chemical Apparatus, 205, 207, 209 & 211 Third Ave., Corner of 18th Street, NEW YORK. SOLE AGENTS FOR THE UNITED Penn OF NORTH AMERICA, FOR Foe: E. March’s Szline Chemical Stone Ware. A ; eae Schleicher & Schuell’s Chemically Pure and Common Filter Paper. ot Doctor C. Scheibler’s Saccharome- ae ters (Polariscopes). is | | Prof. Jolly’s Specific Gravity Bak io ‘ances, etc. ete Le Brun F. Desmontes & hase, e os Paris, Platinum. : se i H. Tronesdorff’s C. P. Chemical. poe SPECIALTIES: 2h cesta Apparatus, Normal Goiduated Glass. ware, Porcelain from the Royal Berlin and Meissen ‘Factories, Bohem jan and German Glassware, Filter Papers, Agate Mortars, Pure Hammered Platina, Balances and Weights, Copperware, Bunsen’ Burners and Combes Furnaces, Sse tus and Chemicals - ag Chemists. ee eae LABORATORY ‘ourrits ae ; : ? a ASSAYER : un re ae Gass Browne, — PUBLICATIONS OF THE CLUB. (x) THE BULLETIN. 3 This journal has been published consecutively since 1870, beginning with four ‘pages monthly, gradually increasing, until in 1892 over 32 pages monthly with — many full page illustrations were issued. The subscription price is $2 per annum. a Terms for England and the Continent of Europe, 10 shillings. Agents for — England, Messrs. Dutau & Co., 37 Sohu Square, London, England. A _. Back Numpers.—The BuLtetin was published from 1870 to 1875, inclusive, — in yearly volumes, and was indexed at the end of the five years. The price of these five volumes is $5.00. The numbers from 1875 to 1879, inclusive, were allowed to Tun on as one volume (Vol. VI.), and were indexed at the end of the five years. The price of this volume is $5.00. Volumes VII. to XVII. have been indexed = separately, and a general index to them printed in pamphlet form, which may be had for 50 cents. The price of each is $1.00. Vols. XVIII. and XIX. are indexed = ‘separately. Price, $2.00. Vol. VIII. cannot now be supplied es but it a4 ie ‘Deans to reprint some of its numbers. (2) THE MEMOIRS. es ; ‘The REN ISCrbe price is fixed at $3.00 per volume i in advance. “The numbers : can also be purchased singly and an invariable price will- be aa for wigeth : aS Volume I contains the following papers: Ra. 1.—Studies of the Types of various Species of the Genus Cares, by. Pro. » H. Bailey. This cannot now be had separately. No. 2.—A List of the Marine Algae hitherto observed ‘on the Sistas. of New ersey and Staten Island, by Isaac C. Martindale. © ‘Price, so cents. ‘ No. 3—An Enumeration of the Hepaticze collected by Dr. H. He. hea a non Ancie with sale of cn Aid species, - Dr. Richard sera isaac a ee sa causlinststie to ce Paes ot "Virgina, with ‘two > plates, by A ey Vail. and Arthur Hollick. Price, 75 cents, sc: ‘No. 3.—Stndies in the Germination. of Some ‘North: ‘Aseecitat ‘Plants, “were by sear hcattt ie $1. 1.00. Mew. XX. ==, AUGUST, 1893, No.8. BULLETIN. = Torrey Boranical CLUB, A HONE Ss JOURNAL OF BOTANY. | ‘EDITED: ‘BY NATHANIEL LORD BRITTON, AND. OTHER, MEMBERS OF THE CLUB. oC o N an EN N x oe a PAGE, Two new Meck Hapasiee ‘@ue Ses lo CLXIt.-cixu. ): Alexander W. Evans. 3°97 | SEC A Study of the Scale-characters of the North- _ _ SaStern Amierican Species of Cuscuta |. ogy, P _ (Plates cixtv, -cLxv): W. D. Matthew . 310 | “Southern Botanists: 7, Lamson-Scribner - ie , Some furt her Notes upon Serenopsis Kempit : "(Plate cixvr.): Arthur Hollick .. 2. (‘The Jeger Moss Herbarium ; Elizabeth G. _ Britton ee . New Honors to Old” | Weeds: Ed : Greene “THE TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB, OFFICERS FOR 1893. President, HON. ADDISON. BROWN. - : Vice Presidents, TF. ALLEN, M. D. _ THOMAS MORONG, Ph. D. HENRY H. RUSBY, M. D., - JOHN K. SMALL, ~ sew College of Pharmacy, New York ky Columbia College, New York City. epee : Editor, ri: “ Treasurer, be yt N. L. BRITTON, Ph.D, -~.* HENRY OGDEN, Columbia College, New York City. 11 Pine Street, New York City. por Editors, wee "EMILY Ez, GREGORY, Ep. Diy ‘ARTHUR HOLLICK, Phe Be ANNA MURRAY VAIL, eels i _ BYRON D. HALSTED, Se. | D., A Aw. HELLER, ; at Curator, | ee es ‘Librarian, - _ JOSEPHINE Be ROGERS. ‘EFFIE , SOUTHWORTH. : “Ginbeleles on Pevawek! _ Jestus F. FOGGENBURG, : we — H, von Bae Committee on Admissions. ae as — M. M. LE BRUN, a ae Ae “MRS. S.1 Nes CLARKE, y ‘0 Broadway, ‘New y York City. oe ee Bp ow Best Sarees, New Nori Gey. | Library and Herbarium Committee, oes - JOSEPHINE E. ROGERS, | CECILIA a os EEE 4. / SOUTHWO H, | : BULLETIN OF THE TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB. Vol. XX. Lancaster, Pa., August 10, 1893. No. 8. Two new American Hepatice. By ALEXANDER W, EVANS. (PLates CLXITI.-CLXIII.) LEPIDOZIA SPHAGNICOLA, n. sp. Dioicous, densely cespitose, brownish-green varying to pale green; stems suberect, irre- gularly pinnate above, obtuse or very rarely terminating in a leafless flagellum; in transverse section orbicular, 6 cells in diameter, cortical cells about 12-seriate, slightly convex out- ward, about the same size as the inner cells, but with thicker walls; lateral branches short, leafy, usually obtuse; postical branches, when present, flagellate, hyaline, leafless, radiculose ; tadicles fasciculate, few in number in the upper part of the plant, simple or irregularly branched, sometimes ending in a spheroidal expansion especially on the flagella; stem-leaves mostly distant, transversely inserted, quadrate, deeply 4-parted to within about 2 cells of the base, sinuses narrow, lobes subequal, lanceolate, strongly incurved, ending in a single cell and from 2 to 4 cells wide at base, usually entire, but sometimes bearing a small tooth (composed of from 1 to 3 cells) on the antical leaf-margin near the base; branch leaves similar to the stem-leaves, imbricated, more rarely bearing an antical tooth ; stem-under leaves rectangular, subequally 4-parted to within I or 2 cells of the base, lobes subulate, 1 cell broad at the apex and usually 2 cells broad at the base; branch-under leaves sim- ilar to those of the stem, but usually smaller and only twice or thrice divided, with one of the lateral lobes longer and broader than the others; perianth terminal on a short postical branch given off from the lower part of the stem; bracts in 3 to 5 rows, those of the outer rows small, irregular in shape, usually bifid, ciliate, those of the inner 2 rows much larger, extending © 308 beyond the middle of the perianth, ovate, irregularly lobed and ciliate in the upper part; perianth ovate-fusiform, composed of a single layer of cells, strongly curved postically in the upper part, deeply 3-carinate with obtuse grooves and keels, the mouth strongly contracted and plicate, ciliate; ripe capsule and andreecia not found. Stems 0.5-1 cm. long, 0.09-0.12 mm. in diameter; leaves about 0.3 mm. long and 0.2 mm. wide; leaf-cells rectangular or quadrate, with thickened walls, mostly between 0.025 and 0.028 mm. long and between 0.014 and 0.016 mm. wide; under leaves of the stem 0.09-0.12 mm. long, and 0.14—0.16 mm. wide; inner perichetial bracts 2.5 mm. long and 1 mm. wide; perianth about 4 mm. long and I mm. wide. Hab.—Among Sphagna in a bog. often accompanied by Mylia anomala (Hook.) S. F. Gray ; Lebanon Swamp, Bethany, Connecticut (A. W. E., 1892). Lepidozia sphagnicola belongs to Dr. Spruce’s sub-genus Micro-' Lepidozia, of which our only other Northern representative is L. setacea (Web.) Mitt. It differs from this species, which it somewhat resembles at first sight, in its larger size, in its deeply four-parted leaves, whose lobes are often 3 or 4 cells wide at base, in its 4- parted stem-underleaves, in its much larger perichaetial bracts, which are not deeply laciniate, and in its long, strongly carinate perianth with contracted mouth. The species of Lepidozia occurring in the United States may be — recognized from their leaves as follows: Leaf-segments extending to about the middle. Z. reptans (L.) Dum. Leaf-segments extending to near the base. Segments 4, 2-4 cells wide at base, basal membrane about 2 cells high. L. sphagnicola, n. sp. Segments mostly 3, 2 cells wide at base, basal membrane 2-5 cells high, “L setacea (Web.) Mitt. Segments 2 or 3, 2 cells wide at base, basal membrane less than one cell high. L. chetophylla, Spruce, var. tenuis, Pears.* JUNGERMANNIA NovaE-CasarEx, n. sp. Dioicous, pale green, ~ varying to dark green or yellowish, growing in loose tufts OF scattered about the bases of bog-plants; stems prostrate, simple or rarely dichotomous, bearing scattered, whitish radicles PEE e ee *Hepaticee Natalenses, Christ. Videnskabs-Selskabs Forhandl. 1886, No. 3 P- 7? 7 tab. v. ( fungermannia nematodes, Gottsche in Wright’s Hep. Cubenses ; Cephalosia nematodes, Aust.in Bull. Torr. Bot. Club. vol. vi. p. 302; Lepidosta nematodes, ce Spruce, Hep. Amaz. et And. p. 366, not ZL. memoides, Tayl. Syn. Hep. p- 717): 309 in the lower part; leaves of the sterile stems usually distant, plane, quadrate or broadly ovate-quadrate, more or less nar- rowed at the base and very obliquely inserted, not decurrent, divided by an obtuse or lunulate sinus into 2 unequal, usually obtuse lobes, the antical being the larger, margins entire; leaves of the fruiting stems broader, less obliquely inserted often imbricated, irregularly 2-4-lobed, increasing in size to- ward the perianth; underleaves occasionally present, lanceo- late or ovate-lanceolate, entire, free or connate with one or both adjacent side-leaves; 9 bracts large, often broader than long, quadrate or orbicular-quadrate, 3-4-parted with narrow sinuses, lobes acute or obtuse, entire, sinuate or somewhat subdivided; bracteole single, ovate or obovate, entire or 2- lobed, connate with the innermost bract; perianth terminal, long-exserted, erect, cylindrical, obtusely 5-carinate to below the middle, composed of a single layer of cells in the upper three-fourths, thence of 2 layers down to very near the base, where it becomes 3 or 4 cells in thickness, the mouth con- tracted, minutely and irregularly denticulate; capsule small, Oval; spores muriculate, reddish-brown, elaters similarly col- ored; perigonial spike tinged with purple, at first terminal but later innovating from the apex; bracts 2 to § pairs, imbricated, complicate, bilobed with obtuse lobes and_ sinus, oligan- drous; gemmiparous stems small, or often depauperate, bear- ing the minute oval gemmz at their apices and on the margins of modified upper leaves. : _ Sterile stems about 1 cm. long and 0.18 mm.—Oo.25 mm. in diameter; fertile stems longer and thicker; leaves of the sterile stems usually between 0.9 and 1.1 mm. in length and breadth; leaf-cells medium-sized, polygonal, thin-walled, usually between 0.034 and 0.046 mm. in diameter in middle of leaf, but sometimes below 0,030 mm. and more rarely above 0.050 mm. ; inner peri- chaetial bracts 2-2.5 mm. long and 1.75—2 mm. wide; perianth 3 mm. long and 0.8 mm. wide; spores mostly 0.012-0.014 mm. in diameter ; elaters 0.1 mm. long and 0.008 mm. thick. . Hab.—In peat bogs; Atsion and Pleasant Mills, New Jersey (A. W. E.); in a wet path through boggy ground, East Haven, Connecticut (A. W. E.). In spite of the occasional presence of underleaves, this species bears some resemblance to Jungermanmia incisa, Schrad.; it differs from that species most markedly in its pale color and looser habit, in its usually 2-lobed and explanate leaves with entire margins, and in its cylindrical perianth ; its leaf-cells, too, are larger, less chlorophyllose, and with thinner walls. New Haven, Conn. Re 310 Explanation of Plates, (PLaTE CLXIL) Lepidozia sphagnicola, n. sp. Fig. 1. Plants, natural size. Fig. 2. Part of stem, postical view. Fig. 3. Stem-leaf. Fig. 4. Branch-leaf. Fig. 5. Stem-underleaf. Figs. 6-8. Branch-underleaves. Fig. 9. Inner bract. Fig. 10. Perianth. (PLaTE CLXIIL.) Fungermannia Nove-Cesarea, n. sp. Fig. 1. Plants, uatural size, Fig. 2. Apex of stem with perianth, postical’view. Fig. 3. Antheridial stem, antical view. , Figs. 4-5. Parts of sterile stems, postical view. Figs. 6-7. Perichaetial bracts (fig. 7 showing connate. bracteole). Fig. 8. Transverse section of perianth, Fig. 9. Teeth from mouth of perianth, A Study of the Scale-characters of the Northeastern American Species of Cuscuta. By W. D. MaTrHEew. (PLates CLXIV.-CLXV.) In the schemes for the classification of Cuscuta, the scale- characters are given but small prominence, though it would seem that as a convenient means of distinguishing the species one from another they may be of considerable service. They vary a great deal in the different species, but are apparently quite constant in each and seem to belong to two or three distinct types. The classification here made is intended rather as a key than as any attempt at a systematic division. as The scales may be separated from the first into two types, one Di of which is deeply crenulate, the other fringed with processes: os To the first class belong the two introduced species, C. epi 4 311 and C. £pithymum; to the second all our native species. The latter may be divided into those with ovate scales and short, irreg- ular processes, of which C. arvensis is a type; and those with ribbon-shaped scales and long regular processes, of which C. Gronovit is a type. One species, C. cuspidata, is intermediate in scale-characters between these two divisions, though nearer to the type of arvensis; and three others have the scales greatly re- duced, of which one, C. Coryli, is closely connected with C. a- decora, of the arvensis type; another, C. Polygonorum, seems related to C. arvensis itself; and the third, C. Cephalanthi, has the scales of moderate size and also of this type. The long-fringed scales are remarkable in their shape, and are fringed thickly at the tip, but very sparingly towards the base, with long rounded processes. In‘two of the species, C. Gronovii and C. rostrata, they appear softer and more flexible than in the other two; but the chief reliance in separating these must be Placed on the corolla lobes and on the serrate bracts which sur- round the calyx in the two last species. While this division of our Northeastern American species is by no means as exact as that ordinarily given; yet as it depends only on characters observable in the dissected flower, it may be found at times more convenient than that based on the position of the withered corolla on the fruit, a point only seen in fruiting specimens, and then not always easy to determine, as the corolla in some species soon falls away. DIVISION OF CUSCUTA ACCORDING TO SCALE-CHARACTERS. I. Scales crenulate, * Scales not incurved, less than one-half as long as the corolla-tube, crenulate at sen an Ene he at he 1. C. Epilinum. * Scales strongly. incurved, about one-half the tube length, crenulate to the hase 2. C Epithymum. Pe Unie ati ie iar Sees Rear, anaes i ah UE oak feet "hee ange Ces ne gee ray Oe gt paeg ee Low ha ads, ae eek! * Scales large, ovate, isaeiiy fringed to the base with short, irregular processez. + Corolla lobes recurved, acute, aslongastube.. . . 3. ©. arvensis. ++ Corolla lobes incurved, broad triangular, half as long as tube. _ 4. C. indecora. iss Beales small or nearly aborted (but apparently similar in general type to the last division). t Scales variable, almost aborted, tips of corolla lobes inflexed. 5. C. Coryli. 312 +4 Scales small, irregularly fringed, lobes of corolla ovate, less than one- half length of tube, their tips not incurved . . . 6. C. Cephalanthi. +++ Scales reduced to a couple of hairs on each side of the attached part OF te Siament ee et ... 7 C, Polygonorum. *%% Scales of moderate size, fringed to the base with rather short, regular hairs. Corolla lobes acute, half the length of the tube, . . . 8. C. cuspidata. #*%* Scales loag, fringed chiefly at the tip, sparingly towards the base, with long regular processes. + Processes rather softer and more flexible; no serrate bracts on calyx. ' ¢ Corolla lobes nearly as long as tube. . . . . 9. C. Gronovit. tt Corolla lobes less than half as long as tube . . 10, C. rostrata. tt} Processes stiffer and rounder; serrate bracts surrounding calyx. ¢ Corolla lobes ovate ; bracts few in number, broad and serrate. 11. C. compacta. t}{Corolla lobes acute; bracts numerous, narrow, serrate, re- curved at tip 12. C. glomerata, ORS, ee. ded eee ee ees Soe ee oe oe Following is a short description of the characters of each species, with special reference to the scale characters. For amore complete description of other characters, reference should be made to Engelmann’s studies on the genus: C. Epriinum.—Flowers sessile, 5-parted, in small round dense heads. Calyx of 5 broad-pointed spreading sepals, as long as the corolla tube. Corolla lobes half as long as tube, broad, blunt- pointed. Stigmas filiform; stamens with short filaments and _ broad anthers. ‘Scales less than half length of tube, divided at centre, fringed at ends with about 4 or 5 deep’ crenulations, thin in substance. Capsule regularly circumscissile, capped by the withered corolla. C. Epiraymum.—Flowers 5-parted, sessile in small round dense heads. Calyx of narrow pointed sepals, 2% length of corolla tube- Lobes of corolla nearly as long as tube, rather broad, acute _ pointed. Stigmas filiform; stamens with short filaments and long anthers, the two lobes of the latter strongly furrowed. Scales thin, strongly incurved, half length of tube, fringed nearly to the base with deep irregular crenulations. Capsule regularly circum- scissile, capped by the withered corolla. C. ARVENSIS.—Flowers 5-parted, on short pedicels, in rather loose clusters. Calyx lobes very broad and blunt pointed, not exceed- ing corolla tube. Corolla lobes recurved, acute, as long as. tube. Stigmas round (as they are in all the succeeding species); anthers broad. Scales large, confluent at base, broad-ovate, equalling OF 313 exceeding tube, profusely fringed from tip to base with short ir- regular processes. C. INDECORA.—Flowers in large loose clusters. Calyx lobes ovate, pointed, shorter than corolla tube. Corolla bell-shaped, lobes triangular, minutely crenulate, two-thirds length of tube, their tips incurved. Scales large, broad, ovate, confluent, irregu- larly, fringed with short processes to the base. C. Coryi1.—Flowers in loose clusters, 4-5 parted. Calyx lobes triangular to lanceolate, equalling length of corolla tube. Corolla narrow bell-shaped, lobes acute, minutely crenulate, about equalling length of tube, strongly inflexed. Scales very small and thin, separate at base, with a few short hairs on each side. C. CepHALANTHI.—Flowers 5-parted, in rather dense clusters. Calyx lobes ovate, % length of corolla tube. Lobes of corolla blunt, ovate, spreading, half the length of tube. Scales about half the length of tube, fringed chiefly at tip with irregular short hairs. C. Potyconorum.—Flowers 4-5-parted, in loose clusters. Calyx lobes Narrow, ovate. Corolla lobes triangular, longer than tube. Scales almost obsolete, consisting of two or three hairs on each side of the attached part of the filament; they are so small and thin as to be almost indistinguishable. C. cusprpata.—Flowers in large branching clusters, long and narrow, with two or three bracts at base. Calyx in specimen ex- amined of five lanceolate lobes, % length of corolla tube. Lobes of corolla lanceolate-triangular half length of tube. Scales nar- row and long, % to % length of tube, confluent at base, fringed from tip to base with short, moderately regular processes. C. Gronovit.—Flowers 5-parted, bell-shaped, in small clusters. Calyx 2% length of corolla tube of 5 long, ovate lobes. Corolla lobes nearly equalling length of tube, rounded, ovate, spreading. Scales narrow, ribbon-like, equalling or slightly exceeding the tube, fringed thickly at tip and very sparingly along the sides, with long cylindrical. processes, each about half the length of the scale. C. Rosrrata.—Flowers large, loosely clustered. Calyx of 5 broad, ovate-triangular lobes, about ¥% length of corolla tube. Corolla lobes broadly ovate, about % length of tube. Scales some- what variable, ribbon-shaped to spatulate, fringed at tip and spar- ingly on the sides with processes similar to those of the last species. 314 C. compacta.—Flowers sessile in dense masses, having 3 or 4 solid-ribbed rhombiform bracts, and a calyx of 5 separate sepals, which are oblong, blunt-pointed, thinner than the bracts, other- wise very similar to them. Corolla lobes ovate, about % length of tube. Scales half the length of tube, generally more or less ribbon-like, fringed chiefly at tip with long processes, which are somewhat rounder and stiffer than in the two preceding species. C. GLOMERATA.—Flowers sessile in very dense cylindtical masses, having numerous, narrow, strongly ribbed, recurved serrate bracts, and calyx of five separate sepals, which are like the bracts, but broader and less strongly ribbed. Corolla lobes lanceolate- triangular, 1% length of tube, which scarcely exceeds the calyx bracts. Scales ribbon-like, 24 length of tube, fringed copiously at tip, sparsely on sides, with processes like those of the last species. Description of Plaies CLXIV. and CLXV. Fig. 1, a-c, C. Epilinum—ia, corolla laid open 5; Ib, calyx laid open 5; I¢ ovary < 5; Id, scale and stamen SX 12. Fig. 2, a-e, C. Epithymum—za, corolla laid open >< 6; 2b, calyx laid aye 6; 2c, ovary 6; 2d, scale & 15; 2e, anther < 15. Fig. 3, a-c, C. arvensis—3a, corolla laid open < 9; 3b, calyx laid open X 9; 3% scale < II. - Fig. 4, a-e, C. indecora—aga, corolla laid open > 4; 4b, calyx laid open 4; 4% ovary X 4; 4d, scale 12; 4e, anther and corolla lobe > 12. Fig. 5, a-d, C. Cory/i—sa, corolla laid open <6; 5b, calyx laid open <6; 5¢, Ovary X6; 5d, scale X15. Fig. 6, a-d, C. Cephalanthi—6a, corolla laid open >< 3; 6b, calyx Jaid open X 35% ovary <9; 6d, scales and stamens 9. Fig. 7, a-c, C, Polygonorum—Za, corolla laid open < 6; ab, calyx laid open < 6; '. 7c, scale-and anther 12. Fig. 8, a-f, C. cuspidata—8a, corolla laid open X 5; 8b, calyx laid open * 53 8c, ovary X 5; 8d, scale 12; 8e, bract X 3; 8f, flowers < 4. Fig. 9, a-d, C. Gronovii—ga, corolla laid open 9; 9b, calyx laid open X 53 9° ovary X 9; 9d, scale X 10, t Fig. 10, a=d, C. rostrata—toa, corolla laid open < 5; 9b, calyx laid open X55 Ovary X 5; 9d, seale X I1. “Fig. 11, a-e, C. compacta—t1a, corolla laid open 5; 1b, sepal x 5; 1c, bract 5; 11d, ovary; 11e, scale < 9. ; Fig. 12, a-e, C. glomerata—t2a, corolla laid open X 5; 12b, sepal X 5; 3 12e, bracts - X 53 2d, ovary X 5; 12e, scales x 12. 315 Southern Botanists.* By F. LAMsSon-SCRIBNER, Ladies and Gentlemen: At this season (March 26th) there may be found in our rich woodlands, brightening the deep shades with its pure white flowers, a little plant known to botanists the world over as Jeffersonia. A more delicate tribute cannot be paid a worker in the science of botany than to name for him some new or undescribed plant. Only those who by their direct labors have increased our knowl- edge of the vegetable kingdom, or who have in some way mate- tially aided in the advancement of the science, have been thus» honored. It is the purpose of this lecture to pass in review some of those who have been thus distinguished in the annals of Amer- ican botany, or who have thus become identified with the plants of the Southern States. The number is far too great for all to be included in a popular lecture, nor can I claim your time to say all that I would like to say of those even who are ranked most prominent. Jeffersonia diphylla commemorates one whose name and fame are so well known to all that I scarcely need more than mention him. Although Jefferson was not a botanist, his recognition of the science and the successsul encouragement which he gave to its prosecution will ever be remembered by botanists in the plant Which bears his name. In the development of our nation and national politics this name will ever stand among the first and foremost, and in the development of natural history in America it holds a no less prominent position. “It is probable,” says G. Brown Goode, “that no two men have done so much for science in this country as Jefferson and Agassiz; not so much by their direct contributions to knowledge as by the immense weight they Save to scientific interests by their advocacy.”+ To Jefferson’s interest and influence was due the organization of the first government exploring expedition, that of Lewis and * A lecture delivered at the University of Tennessee, March 26, 1889. : +“The Beginnings of Natural History in America.” Liberal use has been made Of this address by Prof. Goode in the preparation of this lecture. pe) FG en * i 316 Clark, into the far Northwest—the precursor of all like enter- prises carried on by the general government, culminating in the _ present magnificent Geological Survey, A little incident illustrating Jefferson’s scientific enthusiasm is thus related. On going to Philadelphia to be inaugurated Vice- President, he carried with him a collection of fossil bones which he had obtained in Green Brier county, Virginia, together with a paper in which were formulated the results of his studies upon them. This was published in the Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, and the animal which the bones illustrated is still known as Megalonyx Jeffersoni. The spectacle of an American statesman coming to take part as a central figure in the greatest political ceremony of our country, bringing with him a lot of bones and an original contribution to science is one long to be remembered, and is not likely soon to be repeated. Botanists have done well to preserve in their special field the memory Of this man, remarkable as he was great. A tropical American genus of woody climbers, Banisteria of Linnzus, was dedicated to John Bannister, who settled in Virginia some time prior to 1668, and who published in 1686 a “Catalogus Plantarum in Virginia Observatarum,” which was the first system: atic paper upon natural history emanating from America. l¢ was an artist, for with his notes and dried specimens transmitted to Bishop Compton and John Ray, of England, he sent drawings of the rare species which he found... Ray says of Bannister in his « Historia’ Plantarum,” “erudissimus vir et consummatissimus Botanicus.” The memory of John Bannister is still cherished in Virginia where his descendants are numerous. That attractive little spring flower Claytonia Virginiana, which enjoys the honor of having been the first to fall into the hands of Dr. Gray, when a student, to be analyzed by him, and which with one or two others disputes the right to be recognized as the “ May Flower” of our ancestors, keeps fresh in our memories one of the earliest devotees of botanical science in America, John Clayton, of Virginia. For fifty years Clayton was clerk of Gloucester county ee and during all this period he spent a great deal of time in exploring oe the region about him and in describing the plants which he found. a 317 He was a correspondent of Gronovius and also of the great Linneus, both of whom afforded him much aid in his ‘botanical pursuits. Clayton’s ‘‘ Flora Virginiana,” the first of its kind in this country, began to appear in 1739, subsequent portions being published in 1743 and 1762. At the time of his death he left two volumes of manuscripts, and an herbarium with marginal notes and references for the engraver who should prepare the plates for his proposed work. All this material, the result of many years of labor, was destroyed by fire during the Revolutionary War, and thus perished what was probably one of the most important works on American botany written before the days of Gray and Torrey. The author of the first work written in America on the princi- ples of science (Botany and Zoology), was, like Clayton, a resi- dent of Virginia. The low-creeping, evergreen vine, known to very one as Partridge-berry, was named by Linnzus in honor of this author, Mitchella repens. Dr. John Mitchell was born in England, but he early came to Virginia where he spent nearly fifty years practicing medicine and promoting science. He was a man of broad culture and was one of the earliest chemists and physicists in America. His political and botanical writings were numerous and were always well received, and Mitchell’s map of North America is still an authority in boundary matters. It has been said of Mitchell and Clayton that together they gave to the botany of Virginia a distinguished lustre. Mark Catesbey spent a dozen years in Virginia and the Caro- linas, from 1712 to 1725, collecting and making paintings of birds and plants, and his magnificent, illustrated work on the Natural History of Carolina, Florida and the Bahamas, is still of very §reat value to students. A Rubiaceous genus of the Antilles perpetuates his name. John Bartram, whose home was near Philadelphia, but who extended his botanical explorations into some of the Southern States, was styled by Linnzeus “the greatest natural botanist in the world.” He was made botanist to His Majesty for the Flor- idas by George III., and was given a pension of 50 pounds a year. He was a collector rather than an investigator, and did botany great service by supplying plants and seeds to Linnaeus and 318 other European botanists. He is best remembered in the so- called Bartram oak, Quercus heterophylla, and in the unique bo- tanic garden which he established on the banks of the Schuylkill, near Philadelphia. An herbaceous plant of the Old World, Michauxia, com- memorates the author of the first “Flora of North America,’ and the most untiring explorer this country has ever seen. Although André Michaux the elder cannot be ranked as a Southern botan- ist, as he spent only a few years in the Southern States, he so identified himself with our flora, and being the first botanist to cross the mountains, in 1795, from the East into Tennessee and Kentucky, that we cannot pass him wholly unmentioned. Of the 1700 species of plants enumerated in Gattinger's “Tennessee Flora,’ over 135 were originally described and named by Michaux, and many of these were found by him, some for the first time, within our State limits. Michaux, with his son’s assist- ance did more than any other man to diffuse a knowledge of our forest trees, particularly the oaks. His “Flora” was published in 1803. Passing over a number of names scarcely less noteworthy than those already mentioned, we come to those who have been most active in the investigation of Southern plants within the present century. : A yellow-flowered composite plant of the sand hills of Georg!a and Florida, named by Nuttall, Baldzwinia multiffora, calls up be- fore us one of our pioneers in the field of botany, Dr. William Baldwin. Dr. Baldwin was born in Pennsylvania in 1779, edu- eated at the University of that State, and in 1811 removed to Georgia. He was a man much beloved by his associates, of whom Stephen Elliott was one, and was possessed with a most amiable character. He studied very minutely the difficult family of sedges, and the yet more difficult genera of grasses, Paspalum and Panicum. One of his best botanical papers was published the Trans. Am. Phil. Soc., of Phila., and another in the American Journal of Science, the first relating to sedges, the second pee - grasses. He was appointed botanist to the expedition under Mar Maj. Long, but his health, never very strong, failed completely eee during the journey to the field, and he died at Franklin, Mo., 319 in the forty-first year of his age. His collections of Southern plants are now in the Herbarium of the Acd. Nat. Sci., of Phila., - Where they are guarded with care and justly prized. Muhlenberg, in Nuttall’s “Genera Plantarum,” did honog to one of the most distinguished of our early botanists by naming for Stephen Elliott, a shrub of the Heath family, which grows in the dry, rich soils of Southern Georgia, El/iottia racemosa. Elliott was born at Beaufort, S. C., in 1771. He was educated at Yale, and while a senior in college he was spoken of as being possessed of more science and general information than was often found in one of his age and standing. He graduated with one of the high- est honors, and returning home applied himself to agricultural pursuits. The people of his State, recognizing his marked ability, elected him first to the State Legislature, and then to the Senate. While a member of the latter body he took a leading part in all important business, and was the originator of the “free school system” of South Carolina, and the Bank Bill creating the “« Bank of the State.” He was for a time President of the South Carolina College and later Professor of Botany and Natural History in the Charleston Medical College. He was the first, and during his lifetime the only President of the Philosophical Society of Charleston. The ver- Satility and vigor of Mr. Elliott's mind may be seen in the variety of attainments in which he excelled. Beginning his career as a legislator, in which capacity he served for many years, he took Prominent and leading parts in many of the important measures of his day. And it was while engaged in public and in engrossing financial business that he found time for literary and scientific Pursuits, which alone would have placed him in the foremost rank _ among men of letters. Botanists remember and esteem Elliott for his grand work entitled a «Sketch of the Botany of South Carolina and Georgia,” Published in two volumes in 1823 and 1824. The technical de- Scriptions of the species enumerated are given in both Latin and English, and these in each case are followed by a more extended account in English in which are given the habitat, time of flower- 'ng, local names and often the reputed medicinal properties and other points of historical interest. The whole work, embracing © 320 1349 pages, together with a dozen finely executed plates illustrat- ing 48 species of sedges and grasses, exhibits great scientific ac- curacy and an unusual amount of care in its preparation. Such was the work which the author modestly styles a “sketch.” It was the chief authority among botanists for this latitude prior to the appearance of Chapman’s “Flora of the Southern States,” in 1860, and to-day it is one of the works which all working botanists feel that they must possess or be able to consult. Until one has written a book, and . especially a book where almost every line is the statement of a fact learned, for the most part, from original observation, can they appreciate the amount of patience and labor involved in the preparation of such a work as Elliott’s “Sketch of — the Botany of South Carolina and Georgia.” In the preface to the second volume, Elliott, in acknowledging his indebtedness to others for assistance, briefly refers to several botanists who come within the scope of this lecture, and I cannot do better than to quote Elliott’s own words in speaking of them. “To those who have aided in collecting the plants from which this sketch has been compiled, the author feels his manifold obli- gations; he wishes to express them particularly to Mr. James Jackson, of Louisville, Ga., from whom he has received many new and many rare plants and whose notes have always rendered his specimens more valuable. To Samuel Boykin, of Milledgeville, who, residing in a most interesting district of country, has added much to the author’s knowledge of its flora by the valuable col- lections of specimens occasionally sent him. } “To Mr. N. Herbemont, of Columbia, S. C., for many speci” mens of rare plants collected around Columbia and in the uppet districts of Carolina. “To Dr. William Baldwin, of the United States Navy, a bot anists of distinguished talents and indefatigable activity, who while residing in the southern districts of Georgia, communicated many ~ new species published in the earlier portions of the “« Sketch.” : “ But principally to the late Dr. James McBride, a tribute 1s due, not only for the services which he himself actually rendered, but for the contributions whieh he induced others to offer. Dex, 2 votedly attached to science, he had the talent to make it popular — _ wherever his influence extended. Profoundly skilled in his pro- — 321 fession and high in the confidence of his fellow citizens, he fell a victim to the fatigues and exposure of an extensive practice. In the midst of a brilliant career, with prospects of increasing useful- ness and extended reputation, he died at the early age of 33.” In dedicating to this gentleman the genus, Macoridea, Elliott says, “I have named this genus in commemoration of the late Dr. James McBride, whose untimely death, medicine and natural his- tory and an admiring country equally deplore.” There are a namber of plants in our flora, both among phanerogams and cryptogams which have been named for Rev. Moses A. Curtis, of North Carolina, a most acute botanist and a gentleman whose character and ability reflect honor upon the State in which he lived. Curtis was born in Berkshire county, Massachusetts, in 1808, and at the age of 22 came to Wilming- ton, N. C., as a tutor in the family of Governor Dudley. He began at once to devote himself to the study of the flora of that region, which was especially rich and interesting. Close up to the village reached the pine forests, abounding in strange plants that charmed the eye and filled the portfolios of the enthusiastic young botanist. His quick eye and assiduity may be judged by the fact that in little more than two seasons during his brief hours of leisure he made a collection of over a thousand species, or rather more than half the number described in Elliott’s Botany. The result of these two years’ investigation appeared in 1834, in Curtis's “Enumeration of the Plants Growing Spontaneously around Wilmington, N. C.,” published in the Boston Journal of Natural H istory. This first contribution to botany by Dr. Curtis was more than a mere catalogue, and it attracted the favorable Notice of his teachers and correspondents. It was so thorough that after the lapse of half a century only about 50 species have been added to his list. Among some of the new plants which he found near Wilmington was the curious and very local Dionea muscipula, or Venus fly-trap. Week after week he would visit the savannas, and, lying at full length upon the ground, would watch the peculiarities of this plant, and the description which he gave of its habits in his first published work has been many times quoted during the last 50 years, showing that he possessed the gift of accurate and entertaining description to a marked degree. 322 In 1835 Curtis was ordained to the ministry of the Episcopal Church and immediately entered upon mission work in Western North Carolina. He spent a year in this work, and while thus en- gaged he took advantage of his journeying in the solitary woods to pursue his botanical researches. He traveled mostly in a sulky which was so arranged that his collecting portfolios could be placed under the cushion of the seat. As he came across speci- mens he would gather them, put them into the portfolios, and so by the end of his journey he had secured a goodly number of ready pressed plants for future study or for mounting in his her- barium. In 1849 he again visited the mountain region, and in 1841 it was said of him by Dr. Gray that “no living botanist was so well acquainted with the vegetation of the Sotithern Alleghany mountains, or has explored those of North Carolina more exten- sively.” Dr. Curtis’ method as a student was that of a broad-minded scientist ; just to name a flower and preserve it was to him but the beginning of his work. His earliest records show that he studied the relations of plant life to geologic and climatic surroundings. The study of botanical geography was begun with his career as 4 botanist and continued throughout, extending over 38 years. The account he gives us in his “ Woody Plants” is to-day the best guide to the natural climatological divisions of the State which has ever been published. He also directed his attention to the numerous economic questions which met him in his intimate ac- quaintance with the treasures of the field and forest. It was this feature of his labors alone which brought him an audience in his © adopted State. His “ Woody Plants,” published as a part of the State Geological and Natural History Survey in 1860, at once be- came a popular manual for the farmer and the woodsman, and for the amateur botanist a key to the more conspicuous trees and shrubs useful for their fruit or timber or as ornaments. The pre face of this little work is an introduction to the geographical dis- tribution of plants in the State and shows what a thorough ac : quaintance its author had with the broad subject. Although Dr. Curtis is known as a man who was intimately acquainted with the flowering plants of the South, it is through a his great knowledge of cryptogams, especially of fungi, that he 323 became most widely known and justly famous. This very diffi- cult branch of botany had few votaries in Curtis’s time, and there was no text-book on the subject published in. America. ° Pro- vided, however, with the two well-known works of Schweinitz, Curtis addressed himself to what was for him a labor of love. He was painstaking and accurate in his methods, and the microscopic work necessary for the determination of species became with him a triumph of skill. Few were the botanists with whom he could compare specimens or exchange notes. _ He pursued this specialty without the stimulus now offered by special societies, and for the greater part of his career absolutely without an audience. It was intense love for the work which led him up to the highest station occupied by any American botanist. Dr. Curtis gave particular attention to the edible species of fungi. He communicated to the “ Gardeners’ Chronicle” for October 9th, 1869, an article on the “Edible Fungi of North Carolina,” and left in manuscript a very complete illustrated work on “Esculent Fungi.” Every one knows the palatable and wholesome character of the common mushroom or pink gill, but few are aware that there are other kinds growing in our fields and woods that are more finely flavored and just as wholesome. In his catalogue of the plants of North Carolina, Curtis indicates 111 species of edible fungi known to inhabit that State, and he remarks elsewhere that he has no doubt that there exist 40 or 50 more. In a letter to Berkeley, of England, Curtis writes: “In Octo- ber, 1866, while on the Cumberland Mountains in Tennessee, although with little leisure for examination during the two days Spent there, I counted 18 species of edible fungi. Of the four or five species that I collected for the table, all who partook of them declared them most emphatically delicious. On my return home, while stopping a few hours at a station in Virginia, I gath- fred eight good species within a hundred yards of the depot. d so it seems to be throughout the country. Hill and plain, mountain and valley, fields and pastures, swarm with a profusion °f good nutritious fungi which are allowed to decay where they ati up, because people do not know how, or are afraid, to use em,” : In 1867 the State published as a part of the Geological and 324 Natural History Survey, a “Catalogue of the Indigenous and Naturalized Plants of North Carolina,’ by Dr. Curtis. This Cata- logue included 4,800 species, and was the first attempt made by any botanist in this country to enumerate the cryptogams as well as the flowering plants, and its appearance was a matter of much scientific congratulation. This work was the result of 25 years of botanical study over a territory of 50,000 square miles. The most important purely scientific papers of Dr, Curtis were his contributions to the mycology of North America, published in several volumes of Silliman’s Journal. A genus of plants, Ravenelia, belonging to the same family as the rust of wheat, perpetuates the name of Dr. Henry W. Ravenel, of South Carolina. At the time of his death, less than four years ago, there were among American botanists none more respected and beloved and few whose scientific work covered so many years of activity. Born with a fondness for natural history, Ravenel pursued his botanical studies with great earnestness and enthusiasm during the whole of his long life. He made extensive collections of plants, but he was no ordinary collector, heaping up rough ma- terial to be exchanged for specimens to be counted rather than studied. He was a most accurate observer, and always noted the habits and peculiarities of the plants he gathered. There was not a group of plants, no matter how small, which escaped his obsef- vation. He not only studied critically the phanerogams of his State, but he collected and studied as far as it was possible in his time and in a region remote from large libraries, mosses, lichens, alge and fungi. He was a zealous follower of Dr. Curtis, and be — came recognized as authority on the species of fungi in the South- : ern States, for no one possessed such an intimate acquaintance — with them. He discovered many new flowering plants and a sur prisingly large number of cryptogams. His interest in the latter group brought him into correspondence with the leading mycolo- f gists of Europe, and Ravenel became nearly as well known abr oad : as at home. He is best known to the botanists of to-day by his _ published sets of fungi, a dozen volumes or more, which are ROW = rare and exceedingly valuable. His writings are not numerousy ss but they are characterized by thoroughness and indicate an active — 325 mind which went beyond mere descriptions and inquired into causes as well as results. His work was not solely for the scien- tific world; he was for many years botanist to the State Board of Agriculture and an editor of an agricultural paper. His popular articles on the grasses of the South are of special interest and value, for he devoted much attention to these plants and appre- ciated their agricultural importance. He is spoken of as having been a man whose life was full of kindness to all about him and an example of what a botanist should be. Among the Southern botanists who have worked in this field and become identified with Southern plants are many who have _attained distinction through their labors, but of whom I have not the time to speak. I must, however, mention the names of Lind- heimer and Fendler, whose collections have become classical through the publication of Engelmann and Gray; of William F. Feay, of Georgia, whose devotedness to botany led to a number of interesting discoveries; of Prof. John L. Riddell, who for many years resided at Mobile, and whose name is indelibly associated with botany through the genus Riddellia; of S. B. Buckley, who discovered and published many new species of Southern plants, and for whom Buckleya distichophylla, a graceful Santalaceous shrub of the mountains of North Carolina was named; of Dr. C. W. Short, of Kentucky, justly famous in his time and whose ser- vices were recognized by Dr. Gray in that extremely rare plant found only near Roan Mt., Shortia galacifolia; of John Williamson, of Kentucky, the artist botanist whose “Fern Etchings’’ gained him a world-wide reputation; of Le Conte, of Georgia, who mono- graphed our species of the genus Paspalum; and lastly, but by no means least, of Dr. Engelman, of St. Louis, Mo., whose botanical Works placed him in the first rank of men of science and whose publications will always be essential to every working botanist. Passing over these thus briefly, we come to those who are yet living and still active in the cause. We cannot omit speaking of Judge M. Thomas Peters, of Moulton, Ala., although he is no longer actively engaged in botany, Judge Peters was one of the first to draw the attention of botanists to the ferns of his State and was the discoverer of that beautiful little species named in his honor, Zyichomanes Petersii. — 326 There are numerous private as well as public herbaria, both in this country and in Europe, that owe many of the treasures they possess to the kindness and generosity of Judge Peters. He brought to light that rare and curious sedge, Carex Boottiana, and he was one of the earliest students of the fungi of Alabama. His collections of this class of plants as well as his botanical library he donated to. the Alabama State University. " The discoverer of the very rare NMeviusia Alabamensts, the Rev. R. Nevius, should be named in passing, although he is now stationed on the Pacific coast. He communicated many interest- ing Southern plants to Dr. Gray, and in his new field of labor he is continuing his botanical studies, paying particular attention to mosses. Louisiana is at this time the fortunate possessor of a most in- dustrious and acute botanist in the person of Rev. A. B. Langlois, of St. Martinsville. Mr. Langlois was born in France in 1832, and he began. his botanical studies in. that country, for before coming to America in 1855, he had made an herbarium of some 1200 species. He spent nearly two years in Cincinnati complet- ing his ecclesiastical education, and then located at Point-a-la- Hache, La., where he remained for thirty years. The locality being near the delta of the Mississippi was one of peculiar botan- ical interest, and Mr. Langlois succeeded in discovering many rare and some new species of plants. Langlois has carried om his botanical studies under circumstances which would have de- terred many from undertaking them. He has been entirely cut off from botanical associates, and the climate of his region is SO moist as to render the drying of specimens most difficult. Upon going to Point-a-la-Hache, he at once renewed his botanical work, but being entirely without books and wholly unacquainted with any American botanist, he sent his first collections, numbering some 300 species, to France to be named, but he never heard . from them or received one word of encouragment. Evidently 3 disheartened he dropped the study of plants for twenty years;* period which he now looks upon with deep regret. In 187 ane began again the study, first with only Wood’s “ Manual,” and g then with Chapman’s “Southern Flora.” Langlois thus relates ee his progress from this time, «By accident I learned that there 327 ’ was a botanist, Dr. Puissant, at the Ecclesiastical Seminary of Troy, N. Y., and I immediately wrote to him offering Southern plants for Northern ones, and I received from the doctor about 500 species. Soon after I found out there was published here a “ Botanical Gazette,” for which I immediately subscribed. From this journal I learned many things unknown to me before; through its advertisements I got plants from Eggert, of Missouri, Pringle, of Vermont, and a check-list from Patterson, of Illinois. Then I began to know and appreciate the advantages of having correspondents. The ones who have been of greatest service to me in phanerogams are Morong, of Massachusetts, Wibbe, of New York, and later, J. Donnell Smith, of Baltimore. In grasses ‘Ihave been assisted by Dr. Vasey, of Washington, and in Cyper- acez by Connant. : “In 1884, through the kindness of Mr. Lehnert, of Washing- ton, I began the study of mosses, liverworts and lichens, and in the latter part of 1885, at the suggestion of Mr. Scribner, I began the study of fungi. I soon acquired a deep interest in these plants, and have been greatly aided in their study by Prof. Ellis, of New Jersey. The mycological flora of Louisiana being so rich and at the same time so poorly known, I have for the past three years given almost my entire attention to it. Every day I make new discoveries, and I am yet far from having exhausted this in- tensely interesting part of the Louisiana flora.” Mr. Langlois has Now an herbarium containing some 5000 species of North Ameri- can plants, including 1214 species of Phanerogams and vascular ‘typtogams of his State. So far as his State is concerned, this work has been done single-handed. About a year ago, Langlois Published a catalogue of Louisiana plants which embraced the ~ fungi he had found, now numbering 1200 species. Langlois’ collections are widely distributed in the herbaria of this country and in France, and his specimens are highly valued by all who Possess them. : I have been thus particular in speaking of Mr. Langlois, not Only to show the interest that may be acquired in the study of botany, but also to show what may be accomplished under condi- tions most adverse. Mr. Langlois is now rector of St. Martin’s - church, St. Martinsville, La. o 328 For many years botanists of this country, when they have wished specimens of Southern plants or have desired to learn more about them, have turned by almost common consent to Dr. Chas. Mohr, a druggist of Mobile, Alabama, a German by birth. An assiduous explorer and collector, an acute observer of plants -and a generous correspondent, freely communicating to others the results of his labors, Dr. Mohr has won the esteem and confidence of all American botanists. Nor is his reputation con- fined to this side of the Atlantic, for some of his botanical com- munications to the German scientific journals have been trans- lated into all the leading languages of Europe. What he has accomplished for the science of botany has been done in the hours of recreation which he could command in a pretty hard struggle for an existence in his calling as pharmacist. During the first years of his residence in this country, from 1857 to 1865, he devoted the limited hours he could spare for rest or recreation to the study of mosses, and the specimens he collected of these plants were sent to the leading bryologists of this country and Europe. He greatly assisted Lesquereux and James by furnish- ing material for their work on the mosses of North America, and the many new species which he found were published in the BuLterin or THE Torrey Boranicat Cius under the title of © “Contributions to the Bryology of the United States.” In 1886 Mohr acquired the valuable herbarium of Dr. J. Rid- dell, of Louisiana, author of a “ Catalogue of the Plants of Louisi- — ana” and of a “Synopsis of the Plants of the West.” This her- barium contained the extensive collections of Dr. Josiah Hale, of Alexandria, Louisiana, as well as those of Prof. W. M. Carpenter, and was to Mohr “a mine of wealth and information.” At about the same time he had placed in his hands for determination the — valuable collection of Dr. Denney, of Luggsville, La., from which 4 he got a glimpse of the richness of the arboreal flora of Southert — Alabama beyond the pine belt proper. The study of this collec — tion inspired him with a special interest in woody plants and ta forestry, and his work in this field of botany now stands second tonone. The results of a season spent in the field of 1877 form ; the chapter on the “Forests of Alabama,” published in 1878 1 Birney’s Handbook. This paper more systematically arrang 329 corrected, and new points of special interest to the subject added, was afterwards published separately. For atime connected with the State Grange, Dr. Mohr directed his attention to the grasses and forage plants, with particular reference to those best adapted for cultivation in the coast region of the Gulf States. In this connection he first pointed out the value of Mexican clover and Lespedeza striata. His investiga- tions on these plants were fully published in the reports of the U. S. Department of Agriculture. He also communicated frequent articles to the local papers on this and kindred subjects. Many interesting waifs from foreign countries have been in- troduced on ship’s ballast around Mobile, and the studies Mohr made of these plants led to the publication in the “Botanical Gazette” of a paper “on the plants introduced into the Gulf States.” Further experiences on the same subject gained during the succeeding ten years furnished the theme for an article pub- lished last August in the « Pharmaceutical Revue” (German), on “Plant immigration in the Southern States through the aid of animals or accidently by man.” In 1880 Dr. Mohr was called upon by Prof. Sargent to under- take the investigation of the forests of the Gulf States, in regard to their timber resources and other products and the industries de- Pendent on them. This work kept him engaged in the field dur- ing all of one season and part of another. The results of his ob- Servations were reported to Prof. Sargent and published in the ninth volume of the Tenth Census report. While in the field Mohr discovered several new species and rediscovered a number that had long been lost sight of. His observations also furnished him materials for an article on forest trees of the Gulf region pub- lished in Vol. I of the American Journal of Forestry, and another on “ The Forests of the South and their Bearing upon the Inter- €sts of Agriculture,” which was read at the meeting of the South- €rn Interstate Immigration Association at Nashville. : In 1878 Prof. E. A, Smith, of the State Geological Survey, placed in Dr. Mohr’s hands the plants he had collected during his field work, and from that time dates Mohr’s undertaking to get 4p an herbarium for the Survey to be placed in the museum of the University of Alabama. Uniting his own collections with 330 those of Prof. Smith as a basis, the work has progressed so that now the herbarium contains something over 2200 species of flowering plants and ferns, nearly completely illustrating the entire State Flora. In 1882 or 1883, Dr. Mohr was engaged by the Louisville R. R. Co. to collect and report upon the products of the forest and fields along the line of its road within the State. The collections made formed a most interesting and attractive feature in the Ex- position held at Atlanta and at Louisville, and in 1884-85 they were again exhibited at New Orleans. An account of the material gathered was published in a pamphlet entitled «The Natural Resources of Alabama,” one of the few papers of its kind which possesses real scientific merit and in no way can mislead the reader or prospective settler. A paper on the “Resiniferous Pines of the South and the Manufacture of Naval Stores,” published in the Pharmaceutical Re- view, attracted the attention of the present chief of the Forestry Division of the U. S. Department of Agriculture and led to the engagement of Mohr to prepare for the Department a series of exhaustive monographs on the Southern pines of economic im- portance, to form a part of a report to be devoted to the biology - of North American timber trees. Mohr is possessed with a true scientific spirit and great enthu- siasm in his botanical work. By the amount he has accom- plished it is very evident that he has well improved his hours of leisure and doubtless stolen much time from his hours of needed recreation. But in this day and generation one cannot stop to recreate, for if he does, some more zealous worker will win the prize he seeks. Success from true merit seems now to depend i upon one’s powers of endurance. : Mohr has the distinction of having gone out of the beaten — track of systematic botanjsts and considered the plants he studied — from an economic aspect. He has not only increased the sum of — our knowledge, but he has added to our powers of direct useful- s ness. I would say to those who, in referring to botany, are ever asking the question “cud bono?” carefully read the writings a : ‘Dr. Mohr; they afford a most able answer. _ re A leguminous plant found only in Florida was named by eo 331 Torrey and Gray, Chapmania, in honor of him who is now the oldest of living botanists, Dr. A. W. Chapman, of Appalachicola, Florida. On the 16th of May, almost sixty years ago, there landed at _ Savannah, Georgia, a young man from New England, who has since gained a world-wide reputation as a botanist and become ‘more than all others identified with the plants of the South. The day following his arrival, in a stroll beyond the city limits he found that curious pitcher plant, Serracenia variolaris, and with the aid of Eaton’s « Manual” he determined its name. This was the starting point of a botanical career which culminated in 1860 in the production of Chapman’s ‘Southern Flora.” In 1835 Dr. Chapman settled in Florida, where he has since resided, and during all these years his interest in or love for his chosen science has never for a moment flagged. He has always been isolated from association with botanists, if we except the brief companionship which he enjoyed with Mr. H. B. Croom, whose botanical services have been commemorated in the genus Croomia; but he has numbered among his correspondents all the . prominent botanists in this country and many in Europe. Only Seven of these were ever known to him personally, and he has outlived them all. Dr. Chapman thus writes me, by request, concerning the origin of his principal publication—the ‘Southern Flora.” He says: “TI believe the « Flora’ owes its existence to a suggestion of mine to Dr. Curtis about the year 1856, that we needed for the South a work something like what Gray had made for the North, and that he (Curtis) was just the man to do it. But at that time his hands were full of toadstools and he was rusty among the Phanerogams, and so turned over the matter to me, while promis- ing every assistance in his power if I would undertake the job. My time also was fully occupied with my professional duties dur- ing the day, but I concluded to try my hand at it, after office hours, by way of experiment. Well, I succeeded better than I had anticipated, and was encouraged to go on, and so night after - Night, from 9 to 12 or 2 o'clock, for nearly three years, until ‘Finis’ was reached, found me at work. In the summer of 1859 I _ took my manuscript to Cambridge and consulted with Gray about 332 further proceedings, the result of which was that I concluded to be my own publisher. I went to the University Press, selected the neat typography in which the work is dressed and set the printers to work—remaining with Gray, proof-reading and correct- ing until November, when I turned the concluding pages over to Prof. Eaton and came home. The work was issued just before the war began, and I heard nothing more of it for four years, when Dr. Gray smuggled through the lines a budget of friendly © notices of the work which appeared during those years in the periodicals of this country and Europe, and all at once I awoke to bigness.” Since 1860 Dr. Chapman’s Flora has been the standard botany for the Southern States, ranking with Gray’s “ Manual” for the States of the North. Early in 1883 Dr. Chapman published a reprint of the work, to which he added a supplement in order to include the many plants discovered within the range covered by the Flora, particularly in Florida, since the publication of the first edition. And now at the advanced age of 80 years, the doctor is actively engaged in the preparation of another edition of his Flora to meet the changes which have been made in recent years in systems of arrangement and in nomenclature. It was only the other day that I received a letter from him asking the loan of some specimens from the Gattinger Collection in order that he might settle for himself some determinations that had been brought into question. I do not know how far this new edition has progressed, but it is the hope of all botanists that this ven- erable, most courteous and faithful worker may live to again write the word finis and see the full fruition of his labor. The rich and varied flora of our own State has been made known to the world by Dr. A. Gattinger, of Nashville, through his publication entitled “Tennessee Flora.” Dr. Gattinger came to this State some 42 years ago and was located for a time here in the East, but he soon went to Nashville, where he has since resided. During all these years he has been an industrious col- lector and close observer of Tennessee plants, making many jour neys to inaccessible or out-of-the-way places to discover some — variety or increase his knowledge of plant distribution. Quite _ number of new species have been found by him and several of 333 these bear his name. His herbarium, of which the University of Tennessee is now the fortunate possessor, was one of the finest private collections in the country. It numbers between three and four thousand species, besides a large stock of duplicates which can be used in making further accessions to the herbarium proper. The Flora.of Tennessee and the general Flora east of the Missis- sippi are well represented in it. The collection has been enriched through exchanges with many prominent botanists, both North and South. Dr. Gattinger has directed special attention to the grasses of ~ Tennessee, and he contributed the most important chapters in Killebrew’s work on these plants. - _ His “Flora of Tennessee,” published in 1887, is a work of excellent merit and at once stamps its author as a botanist of the first order. In speaking of his experience, in the preface to the “Flora,” he says «I am yet in possession of specimens collected in 1849, when I first took up my residence in East Tennessee as a practicing physician. Placed as I was in those early days amid unfamiliar modes of life, with no access to intellectual resources, Without information about the condition and advance of scientific affairs in this country, my botanical progress could for many years be no other than tedious and slow; but I kept up the pursuit, which since early school years had been to me a source of pleasure and consolation. His “Flora” is based upon botanical collections made exclusively by himself during 38 years’ residence in the State. In it some space is given to a description of the physical characters of the State and the peculiar flora of each division, and the habitat and date of flowering of the species enumerated is 8iven. To the students of botany within the State it is indispen- Sable. It has not been my good fortune to meet Dr. Gattinger, but he is a most agreeable correspondent and his letters bespeak @ man of high culture and refinement. . He has accomplished much by his industry and passionate love for his chosen work, and there are few names better known or held in greater esteem by the working botanists of the country than that of Dr. Gattinger, of Tennessee. i" The list of Southern botanists is a long one, and contain many honorable and even brilliant names. I would that [ were 334 better able to speak of them as they deserve, but I have already put your patience to a test, and-must now leave the subject with the feeling, which I know is shared by some of you, that “the half has not been told.” Some further Notes upon Serenopsis Kempii. By ARTHUR HOLLICK. (PLATE CLXVL) In a previous paper* I described and figured a supposed new fossil palm, from the Cretaceous formation at Glen Cove, Long Island, under the name Serenopsis Kempii. Since that paper was published, another specimen, in a better state of preservation, has been found, from an examination of which some additional facts of interest have been obtained. The two specimens are alike, except that in the one now under consideration there are thin rays or filaments irregularly inter- spersed between and apparently proceeding from the lower parts of many of the main rays. These are either absent in the original specimens, or else so poorly preserved as to be invisible. They appear to be portions of the main rays which have become sepaf- ated or split off. It may also be noted that in places there appeat to be indications of reticulation between the rays, as if they might have been connected by a membrane. If so it must have been exceedingly thin, and a careful examination of the specimens does does not warrant us in assuming it. I am inclined to think that the filamentous rays and apparent reticulations are merely pOft- tions of the main rays which have been partly torn off, leaving — fragmentary connections. This appearance is strikingly like that which many palm leaves assume upon approaching maturity. Prof. Lester F. Ward, of the United States Geological Survey, from whom I requested an opinion concerning the probable affin- ities of the plant, does not think it a palm, but suggests that it is more likely to be allied to the organisms which have been called *« A ne Fossil Palm from the Cretaceous Formation at Glen Cove, Long Island” (Bull. Torr. Bot. Club, xx. 168, 169, Pl. CXLIX. } : : 835 Williamsonia, whose affinities are exceedingly problematic. Thus far it has not been found attached to any stem, but the triangular apex is identical with that of many palms and is different from any part of any Williamsonia which I have had the opportunity to examine. It is to be hoped that future discoveries may include other parts of the plant and that its true nature and affinities may be determined beyond question. The Jeger Moss Herbarium. Jeger and Sauerbecks’ «Genera et Species Muscorum System- atici Disposita; seu Adumbratio flore muscorum totius orbis ter- rarum,’ was published serially between 1870 and 1878, in the Jahresbericht of the St. Gallischen naturwissenschaftlichen gesell- schaft in St. Gall, Switzerland. It is a bulky volume of 1550 pages, which are not consecutive, being those of the original pub- lication, A list compiled from it isin use at Kew as a shelf index. Besides the names, the original citations are given, with the geo- graphical distribution and the numbers of the exsiccate in which the specimens have been distributed. The collection made by Dr. Jeger includes most of the numbers cited, and up to a recent date was in the possession of the Boissier Herbarium at Geneva. Through the kindness of M. Barbey, who offered the collection to us, and the generosity of several friends, it has recently been pur- chased and presented to the Herbarium of Columbia College. It is undoubtedly the most complete collection of exotic mosses in this country, occupying about 90 cubic feet. It is packed in large pasteboard boxes, the specimens laid loose in species covers of the standard size. We shall incorporate it into the general herbarium, designating the specimens by an appropriate stamp. The most valuable of the European Exsiccate are contained in it, there being such sets as the following : Breutel, Musci Frondosi Exsiccate. Breutel, Flora Germanica Kryptogamica. Rabenhorst, Bryotheca Europea. H. Miiller, Westphalischen Laubmoose. Wartman u. Schenk, Schweizerische Kryptogamen. 336 Limpricht, Bryotheca Silesiaca. Jack, Leiner u Stitzenberger, Arypiecemen Badens. Wilson, Musci Brittanici. De Notaris, Erbario Crittogamico Italiano. Husnot, Musci Galliz. F. Gravet, Bryotheca Belgica. V. F. Brotherus, Musci Fennici Exsiccatz. W. Ph. Schimper, Un. itini. crypt. Molendo, Univ. itin. crypt. Of tropical American there are Spruce, Amazonici et Andini, a duplicate set, as Dr. Spruce sold his own private collection to us last winter; a set of F. Miiller’s Mexican mosses, with auto- graph labels, also a duplicate, as we had a fine set from the Meisner Herbarium; a set of Wright’s Cuban mosses; of Ber- nouilli’s Guatemala; Lindig’s New Grenada; and a set from Venezuela, collected by Wullschlagel. Of North American sets there are only three, all duplicates. Sullivant’s Musci Allegha- nienses, and two sets of Sullivant and Lesquereux Musci Boreali Americani, 2d edition (1869), one of which we would gladly exchange for the first edition, which is still one of our desiderata. Among Jzger’s own specimens isa set of his Musci Hispanici, and the cleistocarpous mosses which he described in his “ Musci Cleistocarpici” are very fully represented. Besides these, there are many autograph specimens from well- known bryologists, such as Schimper, J. and K. Mueller, Hampe, Winter, Juratzka, Hornschuh, Pfeffer, Bauer, Blytt, Brotherus, Reinhardt, Ruthe, Lorentz, Bamberger, Breidler, Milde, Molendo, Venturi, Mitten, Wilson, etc., including portions of many valuable types. Of. the exotic mosses, other than American and European, there are sets from Greenland collected by Melhose, from Madeira by Bauer, from Java by Van Oorschot and Lacoste, from Australia and New Zealand by King, from the Auckland Islands by Knight and St. Clair, from the Himalayas by Jacquement, from India, Sikkim by Kurz, the East Indies, Nepaul and New Zealand by Sit J. D. Hooker, Japan by Savatier, Ceylon by Hooker and Mitner, New South Wales by Wallich and others. See : EvizaBETH G. BRITTON. 337 New Honors to Old Weeds. By Epw. L. GREENE. The modern history of Californian botany was taken up by men who had never seen the field of their researches, and who had no conception of the number of foreign plants that had become naturalized in this part from Europe a hundred years ago. Many of these had not made their appearance in New England, and were unfamiliar to New England botanists. Several such plants, well-known to botanists in general for several centuries, obtained new names at the hands of writers of the East, as if they had been quite new to science. Dr. Britton, in the last issue of this jour- nal, has been able to identify as old, one of my own supposed new plants; and IJ may here be allowed to indicate that botanists of note have added to synonymy in this manner, before me. Asa Gray, in his day, gave new names to not less than five extremely common and familiar weeds of the Old World, the specimens of which had come to him from this unsuspected habitat of California. When, nearly twenty years ago, the present writer sent him Convolvulus arvensis from California, his letter in answer shows that he had considered this to be an exclusively Californian species, the C Californicus, of Choisy; and when, a few weeks later, the real C. Californicus was transmitted, he named this C. So/danella, an Old World species. But errors of this kind, of which he and other so-called “authorities” on West American botany have made scores and hundreds, do not come directly under my head- ing, being errors that did not go into print. The Old World Convolvulus to which Dr. Gray gave.a new name, as a new species, and in the wrong genus at that, is a grain field weed, as common in California as in Europe—C. pentapetaloides, Linn., which he Named Breweria minima (Proc. Am. Acad. xvii. 228). This error he some years afterward discovered and corrected. But there is One seeming more inexcusable which has not yet been corrected, _ though it was detected by me while Dr. Gray was still living; for I was loath to call his attention to a mistake, the discovery of Which by another would naturally be somewhat humiliating. I refer to a new name that he gave toa plant of such ancient and ee 338 world-wide repute ‘as Pennyroyal, the Mentha Pulegium of Lin- neus. In this error Dr. Kellogg, it must be admitted, led the way; for when the plant appeared to him he named it as a new Hedeoma, H. purpurea (Proc. Calif. Acad. v. 52). In working up the Labiate for the State Survey volumes, after having examined this plant minutely, Dr. Gray simply transferred it to the Cali- fornian genus Jficromeria, where, as he remarks, it is “ anoma- lous ;” and so it stands to-day in the Synoptical Flora, as MJ/icro- meria purpurea, Gray. It is abundant not only on that island in the San Joaquin River, whence Dr. Kellogg and Dr. Gray had it, but also in several parts of Middle California rather remote from that station; and not more than one species of mint, JZ. pzperita, has been more familiarly known in all countries during many centuries. A dozen years ago I found by the wayside, in Berkeley, a Cichoriacea new to me, and of which no account was given in the State Survey volumes, or in any other American book ; but, sus- pecting it of alien derivation, I soon found it to be Crepis virens, Linn., one of the most cosmopolitan members of its genus. But Dr. Gray twice mistook this plant for a new species, assigning it two new names, one in each of two distinct genera. It is his Malacothrix crepoides (Pac. R. Rep. xii. 49), and Crepis Coopert (Proc. Am. Acad. ix. 214); and it was a friendly fortune which permitted him to make this correction of a humiliating two-fold error with his own pen. Even Malva parviflora was by this author new-named JZ. obtusa when first it went to him from Cali- fornia. _ Iam said to have given the new name Paronychia pusilla to an obscure weed of Southern Europe, of which the real name ‘is Herniaria cinerea. It is the only instance in which I have honored an old weed with a new name; and as I have worked upon the Californian flora now nearly as many years as Asa Gray did, my record in this respect seems not likely to prove worse than his, to say the least. Botanical Notes. A Biological Survey of Indiata—At the last meeting of the Indiana Academy of Science, at Terre Haute, a Biological Survey 339 was established for the State of Indiana, and a board of Directors appointed to organize the survey and outline the preliminary work ordered by the Academy. It is the purpose of the Botanical Division during the present year to make such additions and corrections to the published “Catalogue of the Plants of Indiana” as are possible, and to se- cure definite information regarding the distribution of such rare forms as are there published. Specimens illustrating the distribu- tion or occurrence of any plant within the limits of the State must be deposited with the survey before any notice of their belonging to the State Flora can be published. This will insure the ability to verify in future any fact published by the survey. In sending Such material it is desirable that notes on the station, habitat, Fange and abundance of the plant be noted, together with any _ other information that will be of value. . In addition to the flowering plants and ferns covered in the above, it is the intention of the Division to commence the study of the distribution of the lower cryptogams, concerning which ~ almost nothing has been published from Indiana. While collec- tions will be made of all forms, special attention will be given at Present to the study of (1) Mosses, (2) Hepatice, and (3) Parasitic Fungi. Specimens are earnestly desired of all species, even those that are most common, from all portions of the State. It is desir- able to state with each species the data indicated above, with par- ticular reference to the habitat. In the case of parasitic fungi, it is necessary to indicate the host, and to include sufficient quantity of the host plant, that doubtful determinations may be verified. The Director has been promised the assistance of specialists in the Study of material accumulated. Prof. Lucien M. Underwood is the Director of this Division. A Monstrous Flower of Cypripedium arietinum.—During the early part of June of the present year, while visiting a newly- discovered locality for the rare Cypripedium arietinum, near Mt. Pleasant, Mich., Mr. H. T. Blodgett found a monstrous flower of the species, which he placed at my disposal for study. The flower Was not fully expanded when found, but the parts were fully grown | and soon unfolded. It was remarkable in having the side petals, _ Which are linear and of a brownish color in the normal flower, 340 transformed into sac-like inflated bodies, closely resembling the lip, but differing from it in being smaller with wider and rounder openings, and in not having the edges rolled in. The coloring of these side petals was like that of the lip, pinkish with lines of deep red. The tip of the lip was pushed in upon itself until it was half inverted, partly filling the cavity of the lip. The lip was also flat- tened and broadened more than usual. The whole plant was rather small, but not unusually so. The other floral organs were normal. | Cyares A. Davis. ALMA CoLLEGE, ALMA, MICH., July, 1893. ' Index to Recent Literature Relating to American Botany. Azolla filiculoides—On the Development of. Douglas H.. Camp- bell (Ann. Bot. vii. 155-187; three plates). Sisanical Notes from Taxis en VL _IX. EN. Plank (Gard.. and For. vi. pp. 272; 283). Mention is made of Opuntia Engelmanni, O. leptocaulis, Jw glans rupestris, Leucophyllum Texanum, Condalia obovata, Gail- lardia pulchella, Rubus trivialis and others. Alluding to cypress-trees, the author suggests that the so- called cypress-knees are probably only abortive attempts of the species to reproduce itself from its roots. At Lake Charles, La., the knees of some small cypress-trees were observed bearing twigs and leaves. California Plants—Notes on: IV. S. B. Parish (Zoé, iii. 352-354): Remarks on Calochortus venustus and Lilea subulata. ee Caryopsis——On the Development of the. Rodney H. True (Bot. Gaz. xviii. 212 ; with three plates). : Comarum palustre. (Meehan’s Month. iii. 97). With illustration of the Marsh Cinquefoil. . Contribution to the Biology of the Organism causing Leguminous — Tubercles. Geo. F. Atkinson (Bot. Gaz. xviii. 226, 257). ae Corrections and Additions to Moses Craig’s Catalogue of the. Uncult- vated Flowering Plants Growing on the Ohio State University Grounds. WV. A. Kellermann and W. C. Werner (Bull. No. 25 Ohio oe Ex. Sta. 1893). ) oo 341 Difference between the common Salt-wort and the Russian Thistle. L. H. Dewey (Bot, Gaz. xviii. 275). A comparison of the characters of Salsola Kali, L. and the var. Tragus, D. C. Dioon pectinatum (Gard. Chron. xiii. 718, illustrated). Europaeischen Uredineen auf der Hochebene von Quito—Ueber das Vorkommen von. G. von Lagerheim (Bot. Centralbl. liv. 324). Puccinia coronata and P. graminis are recorded as occurring in Ecuador and Fusarium uredinis is described as new. ° Fertilization—Notes on. Alice J. Merritt (Zoé, iii. 311, 312). Californica. flora of Denver, Colorado—A popular. Alice Eastwood (Zoé Pub. Co., San Francisco, no date). — This little Flora, or more properly cheeklist, enumerates, with Short notes, 484 Phaenogamous plants growing near Denver. ae fee 344-349). Flowers and Insects—XT. Charles Robertson (Bot. Gaz. xviii. 267-274). : es Notes on the insects observed visiting Stelaria media, Malva rotundifolia, Abutilon Avicenne, Hibiscus lasiocarpus, H. Trionum, Geranium Carolinianum, Oxalis violacea and Melilotus alba. Fungi—New Californian. J.B. Ellis and B. M. Everhart (Erythea, “ I45-I 47). Descriptions of new species in the genera Limerosporium, Metaspheria, Eutypella, Pseudovalsa, Phyllosticta and Cercospora. General Notes of a Trip through Southeastern Utah. Alice East- wood (Zoé, iii. 354-361). ere : Grasses of the Pacific Slope, including Alaska and the Adjacent Islands. Part II. Geo. Vasey (U. S. Dept. Agric:, Div. of Botany, Bull. No. 13, pp. 50, 50 plates). o— The second part of this beautifully illustrated work consists of plates and descriptions of the following grasses: Agropyrum di- vergens, Agrostis foliosa, A. microphylla, Arctagrostis latifolia, Airopis Lemmoni, Bromus Orcuttianus, B. Suksdorfii, Calamagrostis 342 arctica, C. neglecta, C. sylvestris, var. longifolia, Coleanthus subtilis, Colpodium pendulinum, Danthonia Californica, Deschampsia elon- gata, D. holciformis, Dupontia Fischeri, D. psilosantha, var. flaves- cens, Elymus arenarius, E. condensatus, E. triticoides, Festuca micro- stachys, F. subulata, F. viridula, Glyccria paucifora, Hystrix Cali- Sornica, Melica bromoides, M. bulbosa, M. frutescens, M. fugax, M. Harfordi, M. stricta, Phippsia algida, Pleuropogon Californicum, P. refractum, Poa arctica, P. argentea, P. Bolanderi, P. Californica, P. confinis, P. Douglas, P. glumaris, P. Howellit, P. Kelloggu, P. ma- crantha, P. nervosa, P. pulchella, var. major, P. purpurascens, a Thurberiana, -P. unilateralis, Trisetum barbatum and Uniola Pal- mert. The descriptions are mainly drawn up by Mr. L. H. Dewey. Glowcephala epiphylla. Geo. Massee (Grevillea, xxi. 33, 34, illus- trated). A new genus and species from Jamaica. Fieracium Pilosella (Gard, and For. vi. 290). The record of this little European species found by Miss Mary — Hunnewell growing spontaneously on roadsides at Wellesley, Mass. Index Hepaticarum, Part [—Bibliography. Wucien Marcus Un- derwood. (Mem. Torr. Bot. Club, iv. pp. 1-91, June, 1893). This is the first of a series of three papers, the second of which is to be an index to all the species described, with a refer- ence to each to the genera recognized at the present time; and the third a classified arrangement of the species to show our present knowledge of their geographic distribution. Besides the 84 pages of authors and titles in the first part, there is a synoptic index to the bibliography, in which Germany leads the list in the number of systematic papers. It is hoped that the further parts will not be long delayed. : Key to Kansas Trees in their Winter Condition. A. S. Hitchcock (Eighth Bien. Rep. Kan. St. Bd. Agr. 1893). An emendment and enlargement of Dr. Britton’s description of this species, drawn from new material. 343 Mariposa County as a Botanical District-—IV. J. W. Congdon (Zoé, iii. 314-325). This part of Mr. Congdon’s paper deals with the subalpine re- gion, and enumerates 295 species inhabiting it. Menizelia affinis as a Field Weed. “Edward L. Greene (Erythea, a = 188). Musee.—A Synopsis of the Genera and Species of. J. G. Baker _ (Ann. Bot. vii. 189-222), This is a very important contribution to our knowledge of the Banana Family. The genera are Heliconia with 29 species, all of Tropical America, H. platystachys of the West Indes and Guate- mala being described as new, Svrelitsia with 4 species, all of Cape Colony, Ravenala with 2 species, one Madagascan, the other of Northern South America, and Musa, with 32 species, all of the Old World. The banana, J. Sapientium in its wild seed-bearing form (JZ. senunifera, Lour.), Mr. Baker concludes probably extends from Behar and the Eastern Himalayas to the Philippine and Malay Archipelagos. oe og SS North American Silenee and Polycarpe.—tThe. B. L. Robinson — (Proc. Amer. Acad. Arts and Sci., xxviii. 124-155, reprint ; Contrib. Gray Herb., New Series, No. V.). This is a treatment of the genera and species of these tribes of the Caryophyllacez, preliminary: to their description in the con- tinuation of Dr. Asa Gray’s Synoptical Flora of North America. It includes Dianthus with 5 species, Gysophila with 2, Zznica with 1, Saponaria with 2, Silene with 50, two of them described as new, Lychnis with 1 5, L. Taylore being a new one from Arctic America. Agrostemma with 1, Drymaria with 5, Polycarpon with 2, Lef- 4ingia with 3 and Stpulicida with 1 species. The arrangement and method of the paper is much the same as that followed by Dr. Gray ina similar work. The citation of genera is carried back to the first edition of Linnaeus’ Genera Plantarum (1737) in ©pposition to the agreements reached at Rochester and Genoa, where the first edition of the Species Plantarum (1753) was decided upon as best. The original authors of species are not cited in _ Parenthesis, which is also contrary to the Rochester code. We 4ppend a few notes on the plants described by Dr. Robinson. 344 Dianthus prolifer, L., has been found as far west as Cleveland, Ohio (H. C. Beardslee, 1891). Déanthus Armeria, L., Lynch- burg, Marion and Eggleston’s Springs, Va.; Tunica Saxifraga (L.) Scop., Flushing, Long Island (Schrenk, 1879); Gypsophila muralis, L,., Staten Island, Deerfield, Mass. (Miss L. R. Heller, 1886); Elmwood, R.I. (J. F. Collins, 1890-92). Silene Gallica, L. Sp. Pl. 417, stands on the page of that work after the one where S. Auglica is published ; Silene Cucubalus, Wibel (1799), was first published by Linnzeus as Cucubalus Behen in 1753, but there is a St/ene Behen, also of Linnzeus; it was next pub- lished as Behen vulgaris by Moench (Meth. 709, 1794), and should be cited S. vadgaris {Moench) Garcke, FI. Deutsch, Ed. 9, 64 (1869); the plant is exceedingly abundant in Northern New Jersey, and extends to Tennessee (Scribner, 1890) ; the name Silene alba, Muhl. Cat. 45 (1813), known to apply to Cucubalus niveus, Nutt. (1818), is rejected as “seminudum ;” from this we infer that Dr. Robinson would reject all the names in Muhlenberg’s Catologue, for this is as well identified as any of them; in this view a large number of familiar names would have to be abandoned; Silene stellata (L..) Ait., extends to North Carolina (Small, 1892, Heller, 1890); Sz/ene nutans» L., is an addition to our adventive flora, found on Mt. Desert; Silene Pennsylvanica, Michx. (1803), is antedated by S. Caro- finiana, Walt. (1788), and the plants are the same (vid. BULLETIN xviii. 268); Silene Menziesii, Hook., and S. Scouleri, extend eastward to Nebraska (Williams, 1890, Webber, 1889); Lef- lingia Texana, Hook., extends to Nebraska (Webber, 1889). Silene incompta, Gray, is reduced S. Bridgesti, Rohrb., S. plcata, Wats., to S. Yhurberi, Wats., Lychnis Californica, Wats., be- comes S. Watsoni, Robinson, S. Macounii and S. monantha, _ Wats., are referred to S. Douglasii as varieties. _N. L. B. Notholena tenera.—A new Station for, S. B. Parish (Erythea, 1. 153-154). | ; Novitates occidentales—IV. Edward L. Greene (Erythea, i. 147- Descriptions of new species in the genera Streptanthus, Car- damine, Sidalcea, Ceanothus, Eriophyllum, Erigeron, Eupatorium, — Apocynum, Asclepias, Muilla, Calochortus and Fritillarias 345 Preliminary Contribution to Our Knowledge of the Cretaceous Forma- mation on Long Island and Eastward. Arthur Hollick (Trans. Be Yc Acad, Sei; si, 239-337 PL Vi) This paper follows a previous one by the same author on “ Plant Distribution as a Factor in the Interpretation of Geological Phenomena, with Special Reference to Long Island and Vicinity,” and may be considered as a demonstration of some of the points which were previously merely surmised as probable. An historical sketch and bibliography of early researches in the cretaceous of Eastern North America is given, after which the author gives the results of his personal investigations of the plant remains found on the north shore of Long Island, notably in the vicinity of Glen Cove. The results obtained prove the existénce there of cretaceous strata beyond doubt, and give indications of their’ former existence at other points along the north shore of the Island. The author is able to identify many of the fossil leaves with those previously found in the cretaceous of New Jersey, Staten Island and Martha’s Vineyard. The following are figured: Liriodendron simplex, Newb.; Laurus Plutonia, Heer; Myrtophyllum (Eucalyptus ?) Geinitst, Heer ; Sapindus Morrisoni, Lesq.; Dalbergia Rinkiana, Heer.; Magnolia Capellini, Heer.; M. speciosa, Heer.; Sassafras (Araliopsis) acutilo- bum, Lesq., and Diospyros primeva, Heer. N. L. B. Plant Distribution as a Factor in the Interpretation of Geological Phenomena, with Special Reference to Long Island and Vicinity. Arthur Hollick (Trans. N. Y. Acad. Sci., xii. 189-202). The author discusses the occurrence of the pine barren flora On Staten Island, Long Island, Nantucket and in Southeastern New England, and endeavors to reason how it came to the latter region. As no trace of it is to be found on the mainland between New Jersey and Rhode Island, the conclusion is reached that it must have spread from Long Island. It is at this point that the 8eological part of the discussion enters, and from the conditions BOW existing it is inferred that the land connection must have ex- isted between Long Island and Southeastern New England in re- ‘Cent geological times, thus affording a land area over which the flora migrated from the southward on the retreat of the conti- ental glacier. wee oka Bs 346 Quercus densiflora—Extended Range of. Barclay Hazard (Erythea, i. 159, 160). Remarks on the Genoa Congress. Otto Kuntze (Erythea, i. 155— i Report of Botanical Section. (Proc. Rochester Acad. Sci. ii. 176.) Among other interesting items, Rhododendron maximum is re- ported from Penfield, N. Y.,a station north of its usual habitat. Report of the Botanist—Seventh Annual. Charles E. Bessey (Ne- braska Sta. Bd. Agric., 1893). Notes on and illustrations of the weeds of Nebraska. A pre- liminary description of the native and introduced grasses of Ne- braska enumerates 154 species, many of them also illustrated. Rudbeckia hirta—Variation in Ray-flowers in. Florence Beckwith (Proc. Rochester Acad. Sci. ii. 170, illustrated). Saprolegniacee of the United States with Notes on other Spectes.— J. E. Humphrey (Trans. Amer. Phil. Soc. Reprint.) This monograph of eighty-four pages and seven full quarto plates is a valuable contribution to the previously very limited knowledge of an obscure but very interesting, important and pe- culiar group of Fungi. The subjects of non-sexual reproduction and sexual reproduction receive full treatment, the various points being brought out with the aid of superior lithographs of the stuctures studied. Following the chapter upon occurrence and distribution of the Saprolegniacez is the systematic portion. There is a key to the genera, and under each genus a key to the species. Eleven species, for example, are given of Saprolegnia; S. Tre- leaseana being new; fifteen of Achlya, with the following described for the first time: A. Americana, A. megasperma and A. papillosa. A full bibliography concludes the work. B. Dew. Sedum radiatum—Note on. Thomas Howell (Erythea, i. 144). Senecio aureus—The Embryo-sac and Embryo of. D. M. Mottier (Bot. Gaz. xxiii. 245-253 ; three plates). Shrubs of Northeastern America. Charles S. Newhall (G, P. Put nam’s Sons, New York, 1893, 8vo, 249 pages, illustrated). This is the second of the series planned by the author, for pre- = | senting in a popular way handbooks of our native woody plants. The first — of the trees, and the third is to preset the vines. 347 In all the volumes the illustrations are by the author, and though imperfect and suggestive rather than accurate, yet they will un- doubtedly be helpful, and add to the attractiveness of the book. We regret that justice has not been done to several of our most attractive shrubs, such as the Laurels. All the drawings are natural size, however, and occupy full pages. The text has broad margins and large type. Besides the descriptions of each species, historical and economic notes occur here and there. Three guides or keys will enable the beginner to analyze any shrub by leaf, fruit or flower, and a chapter explanatory of the terms is also given. The author also advocates in his preface the planting of Native shrubs, advice which will be heartily endorsed by all lovers of our beautiful wild tangles and copses; but the list given as worthy of cultivation seems meagre and lacking in some of the most ornamental. BG B. Stomata and Palisade Cells of Leaves. F.C. Stewart (Proc. Iowa Acad. Sci., 1892, 80-84. Symbiosis and Mutualism in Lichens. Roscoe Pound (Am. Nat. XXVii. 509). Lrematocarpus— The Genus. A.Zahlbruckner and W. B. Hemsley (Ann. Bot. vii. 289, 290). This is an interesting discussion of the nature of certain ori- fices in the capsule-wall of Lobelia macrostachys, H. and A., on Which plant Dr. Zahlbruckner founded his genus Zvematocarpus. In alluding to the proposed genus in a former number of “ Annals of Botany,” Mr. Hemsley maintained that the orifices, taken by Dr. Zahlbruckner as pores of dehiscence, were actually the work of insects. Dr. Zahlbruckner now defends his original position, but Mr. Hemsley still maintains the opinion that the pores are not normal, and Dr. Stapf is to investigate the anatomy of the capsule. The further developments of the investigations are awaited with interest, eee Be 5B Trichomanes Potersii. (Meehan’s Month. iii. 81, with colored illustration.) . Tsuga Pattoniana (Gardn. Chron. xiii. 659, with figure). Two New Plants from Washington. B. L. Robinson and HE, Seaton. (Bot. Gaz. xviii. 237). 348 Allium FHendersoni and Calochortus ciliatus are described as new. Undescribed Plants from Guatemala. John Donnell Smith. (Bot. Gaz. xviii. 197, with 3 plates). Species of Capparis, Xylosma, Stigmatophyllon, Oxalis, Wimmeria, Rubus, Mallostoma, Hoff- mannia, Guettarda, Parathesis, Ardisia, Tabernemontana, Phili- bertia, Asclepias, Dictyanthus, Fimbristemma, Utriculana, Adenocalymna (?), Aphelandra, Tradescantia and eke. are described as new. Uredinee and Ustilaginee.—Description of new Species of —I. P. Dietel (Bot. Gaz. xviii. 25 3-256). Description of new species in the genera nee: Puccinia and Uredo. Utricularia longifolia. (Gard. Chron. xiii.-718). With illustration of the above species, a native of British Guiana. Variety of the Western Sumach—On a. W. L. Jepson (Erythea i. 40). Description of Rhus trilobata, Nutt. var. guinata, n. vat. Views of a working Botanist on the new American Rules of Nomen- clature. J. W. Congdon (Zoé, iii. 339). Weed Seeds found in Clover Seed—A Key for the Tdentification of. F. C. Stewart (Proc. lowa Acad. Sci., 1892, 84-90, illustrated). Yucca Insects and Yucca Pollination—Further Notes on. C.V- Riley (Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash., viii. 42), with illustration of Yucca Whipplet. Zoospores in Spirogyra condensata. ..-B. Bridgman (Erythea, 1. - 128). Contributions from the Herbarium of Columbia No. to, No. 11, No. 12. No. 13. No. 14. No. 15. . No. 16, No, 17 . No, 18, College. A Preliminary List of North American Species of Cyferus, with Descriptions of New Forms. By N. L. Britton (1886),......... 25 cents. Cerastium arvense, L., and its North American Varieties. By Arthur Hol- lick and N. L, Britton (1887). (Out of print.) Plant Notes from Temiscouata County, Canada. By J. I. Northrop (1887). ~ (Out of print.) A List of Plants Collected by Miss Mary B. Croft at San Diego, Texas. By N. L. Britton and H. H. Rusby (1887),.........5-> 25 cents. New or Noteworthy North American Phanerogams. By N. L. Britton CIBBS) 8 a ee ee . . 25 cents. An Enumeration of the Plants Collected by Dr. H. H. Rusby in South America, 1886-1887. By N. L. Britton. (Twenty-three parts published ; not yet completed.) The Genus Hicoria of Rafinesque. By N. L. Britton (1888), . . . 25 cents. A Recent Discovery of Hybrid Oaks on Staten Island. By Arthur Hollick VOROON ee geek pe ee 25 cents. A List of Plants Collected by Dr. E. A. Mearns at Fort Verde and in ‘the Mogollon and San Francisco Mountains, Arizona, 1884-1888, By N. L. Britton. The General Floral Characters of the San Francisco and Mogollon Mountains and the Adjacent Region. By H. H. Rusby (1888),. . . .. 25 cents. Contributions to American Bryology—An Enumeration of the Mosses Col- lected by Mr. John B. Leiberg in Kootenai County, Idaho. By Elizabeth G. Britton. (Out of print.) Preliminary Notes on the North American Species of the Genus 7issa, Adans.: By N. 1. Briton (1880), . os ek ek 25 cents. The Genus £ieocharis in North America. By N. L. Britton (1889), 25 cents. New or Noteworthy North American Phanerogams, II. By N. L. Britton UE a eee ees . . + 25 cents, A List of State and Local Floras of the United States and British America. By ND, Benda fideo: Po eee ee $r. A Descriptive List of Species of the Gena Heuchera. By Wm. E. Wheel- Ok (Beds ce a ee 25 cents. New or Noteworthy North Aiedoids Phanerogams, III. By N. L. Britton. (1890), Be SE ee Py ee, cee ede Be te 2 Sr ad Seen ee re 25 cents. The Flora of the Desert of Atacama. By Thos. Morong (1891), 25 cents. Contributions to American Bryology, Il. A supplementary Enumeration of Mosses collected by Mr. John B. Leiberg in Kootenai County, Idaho. By Elizabeth G. Britton (1891), he poe ees 8 ay Rae so BS COO. No. 22. No. 35. No. 36. No. 37. No. 38, Notes on North American Halorage. By Thos. Morong (1891), .25 cents. New or Noteworthy North American Phanerogams, IV. By N. L, Britton. CUBOR Se eee Se eee ee eas , (ir 25 Sen Notes onthe North American Spactee. of Eriocaulee. By Thos, Morong ORE a er ee es se 25 cents. New or Noteworthy North American Phanerogams, V. By N. L. Britton CRO Boek ns se ae oe i ee ee 25 cents. The American Species of the Genus Anemone and the Genera which have been referred to it. By N. L. Britton (1891),. . 2... :.. .25 cents. Review of the North American Species of the Genus Xyris. By Heinrich Ries (1892), . . ‘ iene i A Preliminary List of the Species = the: Gene? neibouith occurring in the United States and British America. By Anna M. Vail (1892), . 25 cents. A List of Species of the Genera Scirpus and Rynchospora occurring in North Aimerga.:. . By N.Y. Britton (1862)) eee 25 cents. Note on a Collection of Tertiary Fossil Plants from Potosi, Bolivia. By N. Ly Britton (189a)y os . . , 25 cents. The Anatomy of the Stem of Wistaria ‘Sta suath By Carlten C. Curtiss (1892), ee ae tga Mes MO ae aT a? En uae On ee, aN aaa et Pater: |. cents. New or Noteworthy North Asean Phanerogams, VI. “Be N. L. Britton Cl6Ga eS ek Seba ee ee es ee ee 25 cents. Ranunculus repens and its Bistern North American Allies. By N. L. Britton. (1699) ee ee a . 25 cents. A Preliminary List of American Species of Polygonum. By John K. Small. CBs ee ee eee ee 25 cents. West Virginia Mosses. By Elizabeth G. Britton (1892), .. . . 25 cents. A New Species of Listera, with Notes on Other Orchids. By Thos. Morong: RGGI ee ee ee we 25 cents. The North American Species of Lesfedeza. By N. L. Britton (1893) 25 cents. An Enumeration of the Plants Collected by Dr. Thos. Morong in Paraguay 1888-1890. By Thomas Morong and N, L. Britton, with the assistance of Miss Anna Murray Vail (1892-1893)... . ... ++ ++ $1.50. An Examination of the Seeds of some Native Orchids. By Carlton C. Curtiss CSG Re ee, ee ee eee , 25 cents. Further Notes on American Scaulag of Polygonum. By John K. Small CesT eh jog 5 ee New or Noteworthy North American Piknecipinn VIL. By N. L. Britton (Se ee ee ee a ee ee 25 cents. The whole series with the exception of Nos. 2, 3, 6 and 10 will be supplied , for $5. Copies of the Catalogue of Plants found in New Jersey (1889), by N. L. Britton, may be had for $2. Address DR. THOS. MORONG, Curator of the Herbarium, Columbia College, _ NEW YORK CITY. — FOR SALE. « 18 A ZENTMAYER PORTABLE MICROSCOPE, IN PERFECT ORDER, For 3100.00. - - - Catalogue Price, $147.50. Including THREE OBJECTIVES, 1} in., } in., and } in. Also an Abbé Condenser, Glass Stage, and Neat Walnut Case. Address the Editors of the Bulletin, °° Wm. Wales, Fort Lee, N. J. CHARACEA OF AMERICA. The first fascicle of the Second Part of the Characez of America is now ready. It contains descriptions of eight species of /Vite//a, as fol- lows: Nitella opaca, Ag.; obtusa, Allen; montana, Allen; lankin- shipii, Allen; Missouriensis, Allen; flexilis, Ag.; subglomerata, A. Br. ; slomerulifera, A. Br., with fourteen full-page illustrations (eight litho- graphic plates and six photogravures). These fascicles will be issued from time to time as plates can be prepared ; price of each part $1, the actual cost, if the whole edition of 500 copies be sold. Address TT. =. ATaLeN, 10 East 36th St., N. Y. North American Pyrenomycetes. By J. B. ELLIS and B. M. EVERHART. : With original illustrations by F. W. ANDERSON. 2,500 species of the old genus * Spheria,” described and arranged in accordance with the modern ideas of classification. One thick octavo volume, with over 800 Pages of printed matter and 4r full-page tinted plates illustrating the genera ; bound in fine cloth, with stamped covers and gilt-lettered back. Price, $8,00, with 35 cts. additional if sent by mail. Address, J. B. ELLIS, Newfield, N. J. VIRGINIA PLANTS. During the present spring and summer I shall collect along the south- €tn boundary of Virginia, from the coast to the mountains, a region un- €xplored botanically, and one that will beyond a doubt yield a number of new and many rare plants. An endeavor will also be made to obtain “ the new species, about a dozen in all, collected by myself and others uring the past three years in adjacent territory. An effort will be made not only to keep up the standard of previous collections, but also to im- Prove upon them in every way possible. Anyone desiring sets, should Please address A. A. HELLER, 411 W. Wainut St., Lancaster, Pa. F. W. DEVOE & CO. ESTABLISHED 1852. OFFICES, CORNER FULTON AND WILLIAM STREETS, New York. : #@ARTISTS’ - PATERIALS.% Sketching Outfits of All Kinds. Tube Colors, Water Colors, Crayons, Drawing Paper. Canvas, Brushes, Oils and Mediums. Mathematical Instruments, House Painters’ Colors. Fresco Colors. Fine Varnishes. CORRESPONDENCE INVITED. CATALOGUES OF OUR DIFFERENT DEPARTMENTS TO RESPONSIBLE PARTIES. COFFIN, DEVOE & CO., 176 RANDOLPH ST.. CHICAGO. PLANTS..OF PARAGUAY, Two Partial Sets of my PARAGUAY PLANTS remain undis- tributed and are offered for sale at $10 PER HUNDRED SPECIMENS. THOMAS MORONG, COLUMBIA COLLEGE, New YorK CITY. WILLIAM WALES, Fort Lee, N. J. MANUFACTURER OF FIRST-CLASS MICROSCOPE OBJECTIVE». MICROSCOPES FURNISHED OF ALL MAKES—ZENTMAYER’S Al- WAYS ON HAND. INSTRUMENTS ORDERED IN NEW YORK CITY SENT ON APPROVAL. DISCOUNT TO COLLEGES. BULLETIN OF THE TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB.—PLATE CLXII. BULLETIN OF THE TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB.—PLATE CLXIIL. JUNGERMANNIA NOVA-CASARE, EVANS. BULLETIN OF THE TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB.—PLATE CLXIV, 0 _ The subscription price is fixed at $3.00 per volume in advance. The numbers iS fe eee ee) ee oe ON ee ee Volume I contains the following papers: No: Studies of the ‘Types ok veces Species 0 the Genas Carex, by Prof, _ L.H. Bailey. This cannot now be had separately. No. 2—A List of the Marine Alge hitherto observed on the Coasts of New _Jeney and Staten stand, by Iaae C. Martindale, Price, 50 cents. No. 3.—An Enumeration of the Hepatice collected by Dr. H. H. Rus South America, with descriptions of many new marca. Dr. Richard Spruce. + 15 Oekits. sb 5 No. 4.—On Seedless Fruits, by Dr. E. Lewis Sturtevant. Price, 50 cents - Volume II contains.the following papers: -_-‘No. 1.—On Reserve Food Materials in Buds and Surrounding Past, with two, _ plates, by Professor Byron D. Halsted. Price, so cents. No, 2,—Contributions to the Botany of Virginia, with two plates, by Anna ee Murray Vail and Arthur Hollick. Price, 75 cents. _ : » No. 3.—Studies in the ‘Cetanation of Some North American Plats, with Ms plates, by Theodor F Holm. — Price, $1.00. — No. 4.—A Monograph of the North rome Species of the Genus. Polygala, - William E. Wheelock. Price, 75 cents. i Eee Toei Xo, 1.0m the Flor of Wester Nort Carolina znd ntiguous ny, by John K. Small and A. A. Heller. Price, socents pe OR FES SRS Naia , ‘No. 3—An Enumeration of the Plants ‘CoMtected. in > ol by : H. H. Rusby. Meg ee Sot Be Bn a _ Epitep By THE TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB, ‘OFFICERS FOR 1893. President, HON. ADDISON BROWN. Vice Presidents, 7 ALLEN; M.D, THOMAS MORONG, PRE Dy 5 eS Recording Secretary, : Corresponding Secretary, . HENRY H. RUSBY, M. D., JOHN K. SMALL, es of Pharmacy, New York City. _ Columbia College, New York City. sa a Editor, Sa : Treasurer, ‘ N. L. BRITTON, Ph. D, HENRY OGDEN, Columbia College, New York City. — 11 Pine Street, New Sfiateg aay! ae ie Associate Editors, Boer J EMILY ‘L. GREGORY, Ph. D., ARTHUR HOLLICK, Ph. By pee ANNA MURRAY VAIL, =————s BYRON D.. HALSTED, Se D, oe A A. HELLER. “or * ; Curator, — : ee t oyisn as _ JOSEPHINE, E. ROGERS. _EFFIE A. /SOUTHWORTH. Be Cireilenes. on Finance, a PAS epee ne 2 | yustus F. POGGENBURG, pases at ee RUDKIN, EE aN | Committee « on 5 Adoisttbns: eer ee M. M. LE BRUN, me ett de ae MRS. S. B. “CLARKE, 2 Broeeny, New York City. ee. rhe Ww. Bist See ee City. s Library aad Herbarium Coeigles 3 JOSEPHINE E. ROGERS, . CECILIA A. act _EFFIE A. SOUTHWORTH, esr c BULLETIN TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB. Notes on Carex.—XVII. By LL. H. BaAitry; The most important recent extensions of the ranges of the carices are the finding of Carex Assiniboinensis, W. Boott, in Northern Minnesota, by F. F. Wood, and C. alpina, at Grand Marais, Minn., on Lake Superior; C. /orta, in Washington county, Eastern Mis- souri, by H. Eggert; C. capillaris, on Mt. Kineo, Moosehead Lake, Maine, by Dr. G. G. Kennedy, and in Aroostook county, by M. L. Fernald. Carex Assiniboinensis is new to the United States, - having been known heretofore only from the collections of Macoun: in British America. | “ CAREX VERNACULA. C. fetida, American authors, not Allioni. Distinguished from C. fetida, its European congener, by stiffer and shorter leaves, shorter spikes, which give the head a more ' Tegular and compact look, and especially by much larger and broader and more or less prominently nerved perigynia. This species, which is yet imperfectly known, inhabits the Mountains from Colorado and Wyoming westward. CAREX FETA, C. straminea, var. mixta, Bailey, Proc. Amer. Acad. Arts and Sci. xxii, 1 51 (1886), not C. mixta, Raeusch. _ The Pacific coast representative of C. albolutescens (C. straminea, var. fenea), from which it differs in its much slenderer habit, more Open and long heads, smaller spikes and perigynia. The peri- 418 gynia are loosely placed in the spike, giving the plant much the appearance of forms of C. stvaminea and C. fenea. In the Botany of California it is variously referred to C. /agopodioides, C. adusta, C. cristata, var. mirabilis, and C. scoparia, var. fulva. ’ Carex lurida, var. PARVULA (Paine). C. tentaculata, var. parvula, Paine, Cat. Oneida Pl. 105 (1865). Low (8’ to 16’), very slender, with one or two spikes which are half or less the size of those in the type, sessile or very nearly so perigynia not more than half the size of those in the common form. A diminutive form growing along the Mohawk River, according to Paine; I have also collected it in Southern Vermont, and Professor Hitchcock sends it from Ames, Iowa. ’ Carex intumescens, Rudge, var. FERNALDII. Very slender (about a foot and a half high), with leaves nar- rower than in the type; spikes reduced to one to three perigynia, which are erect and slender, being inflated less than half as much as those in the type-——Cedar Swamp, Aroostook county, Maine, 1893. - M. L. Fernald, 127. Forms of C. intumescens sometimes occur in dry woods, in which the spikes are reduced to one or two perigynia; but this variety differs in the slender perigynia which stand erect in the spike. «~ Carex debilis, Michx., var. INTERJECTA. C. debilis Sartw. Exsicc. No. 118 (1848). C. debilis 8 Boott, Ill. t. 273 (1860). Tall and nearly or quite strict, with nearly erect spikes which are often compound at the base, very loosely flowered; perigy- nium shorter than in the var. Rudgei, the beak conspicuously less cylindrical. It differs from the var. stvictior in the much nar- rower leaves and more loosely flowered spikes. Sartwell collected it at Penn Yan, N. Y., and Boott reports it from Pennsylvania by Townsend. Mr. C. L. Shear sends me specimens from Alcove, eastern New York, which is the first undoubted material I have obtained to match Boott’s excellent plate and Sartwell’s speci- mens. I do not know what its range may be. Undoubtedly various intermediate erect-spiked forms, which have always been a puzzling part of Cares dedilis will need to be referred here. The ee 419 erect alternate-flowered spikes and short perigynia distinguish it from the common var. Rudgei. Carex granularis, Muhl., var. REcTA, Dewey, Wood’s Cl. Book, 1860, 763. A very tall slender plant, with narrow erect leaves, narrow spikes, of which the lower are on very long and slender stalks; pergynium less inflated than in the type and straighter. Glaucous. Dewey records it from Southern Illinois (Vasey) and Louisiana (Hale). I have it from Virginia, Southern Illinois, the mountains of Georgia, and Mississippi. It is a well-marked form. No one seems to have taken up the variety except Paine, in his Catalogue of Oneida plants (1865); but Paine must have misunderstood it, for I do not know that it occurs in the North. CAREX GRACILLIMA AESTIVALIS ? Mr. C. L. Shear sends me from eastern New York, good specimens of a most distinct and novel carex. He first found the plant last year (1892), in a moist meadow at Alcove, Albany county. A single clump only was observed, and it grew with C. gracillina. In 1893 Mr. Shear found it again at two places in Greene county—between Windham and Ashland, and at Hunter —Sgrowing in clumps in mountain pastures. The plant differs Visibly from C. gracillima in its much stricter habit, narrow leaves, nearly erect spikes, and by the distinctly beaked and toothed Perigynium. Its association with C. gracillima, and the fact that it is uniformly wanting in good achenia, indicate that the plant is a hybrid. I am unable to determine what its other parent may be, but the fact that the perigynia are attenuated at the top, that the leaves are narrowed, the lower sheaths slightly pubescent, and the habit essentially erect, strongly suggest C. estivalis, and this Species occurs on the mountains of western Massachusetts and in “astern New York. I suspect that further search will discover C. @stivalis in the mountain pastures of Albany and Greene Counties. It is by no means necessary to the diagnosis of a hybrid that both parents be found in its vicinity. One parent, or _ ven both of them, may long since have died out and the hybrid _ May have persisted; yet the hybrid is usually associated with its _ Pistillate parent. I have found undoubted hybrids of Rubus in 420 localities where but one parent could be formed. Nor is it strange that a hybrid should be found to have a somewhat wide distribu- tion. Carex arctata < castanea (C. Knieskernit) occurs in New York, Minnesota and upon the Canadian side of Lake Superior; and I may add that C. gracillima * hirsuta was found at an early day, according to Dewey (Sill. Journ. xi. 31 5),at Newburgh, New York, and at Stockbridge, Mass., although it has been re- corded by Torrey and subsequent writers as having been collected only at Phillipstown, near the Hudson. It is strange, however, if C. @stivalis is the missing parent of this beautiful carex, that the beak should be bifid, for both C. gracillima and C. estivalis have entire orifices. This is the third hybrid which seems to have had Carex gracil- lima for its mother. It is interesting to note, also, that this species often develops its perigynia apparently without the aid of pollination. CAREX STIVALIS, while one of our rarer Carices, has pe a variety of names. Its first name was Carex Darlingtoni given by Schweinitz, but the name was not published until Dr. Boott recorded it, as a synonym, in 1858. The original of this is now in the possession of the Philadelphia Academy of Sciences, and the ticket, in Schweinitz’s hand, says that Darlington collected the plant upon the Pocono Mountains of northern Pennsylvania. M. A. Curtis also gave it the name Carex tabularia in his herbar- ium, and this name was also published as a synonym by Boott. A specimen bearing this name, and coming from Boott, is in the Torrey Herbarium. Kunze called the plant Carex Rugeliana in his “Supplemente zu Schkuhr’s Riedgrisern,” which was published at‘intervals from 1840 to 1850. I am not sure of the date of this name, but it is held to be later than Curtis’ Carex estivalis, which Dr. Gray published in 1842. Finally, Olney, in his Exsiccate, 1871, made it a variety of Carex virescens, with which it has no immediate affinity. The affinity of the plant is with Carex gracil- lima, of which John Carey thought, “if not distinct, it is a moun- tain form.” Dewey confounded it with Carex arctata and Carex sylvatica. But it is abundantly distinct. Its northernmost station | is Saddle Mountain, in western Massachusetts, where Dewey found oe it in 1828, at 800 feet above the base of the mountain. ens 421 THE STRAMINEA GROUP: ‘Willdenow described, in 1809, the plant which has long been known as Carex adusta, under the name of C. fenea. The descrip- tion was not understood, however, and Torrey, in 1836, applied Willdenow’s name to the plant which is now known as C. straminea, var. fenea. These two feneas now stand, applied to plants very like each other, and the circumstance is confusing. I shall, therefore, find some other name for the C. straminea var. fenca of Torrey, especially as I believe the plant merits specific distinc- tion. It was first described by Schweinitz in 1824, as Carex albo- lutescens, and this name I now restore. Unfortunately, Olney misunderstood Schweinitz’s plant and thought it to be the C. adusta of our manuals. I have seen Schweinitz’s original, and it is clearly Torrey’s fwnea. There are forms which are somewhat intermediate between Carex straminea and C. albolutescens, but one who is familiar with the two species can easily place them. But I separate them in order to allow of a philosophical presentation of C. straminea and its varieties. This species, as heretofore constituted, includes two coérdinate branches or type, the stramineous or straw-colored: and the albolutescent or silvery green type. If these types are considered to be coérdinate varieties, it is impossible to recognize Several minor forms, which appear to be worthy varietial recogni- tion, unless resort is taken to the European fashion of sub-varieties. By removing the albolutescent type, I am able to separate some of the well-marked forms which now confuse C. straminea vat. revior into codrdinate varieties. The forms which I desire to remove from it are: ’ Carex straminea, vat. FERRUGINEA (Gray). C. fenea, var. 6 Boott. Ill. 118, t. 376 (1862). C. fenea, var.? ferruginea, Gray Man. 5th ed. 580 (1867). C. tenera, var. suberecta, Olney, Exsicc. fasc. ii. No. 16 (1871). Plant very tall and slender, with two or three pointed or long- Ovate, rusty-green spikes approximate at the top. The spikes are usually prominently tapering below, and the thin, nearly nerveless perigynia have loose points. That has somewhat the look of some forms of C scoparia, but is always readily distin- Suished by its separated spikes and straminca-like perigynia. I 422 know it only from Ohio and Illinois, but it must have a wider range. C. straminea, var. CRAWEI, Boott, Ill. 121, t. 388 (1862). C. straminea, vat. Meadit, Boott, |. c. t. 389. Robust forms with very large heads and mostly round, loose spikes, with very broad, long-pointed perigynia, which easily shell off when ripe. From Connecticut and New Jersey to Illi- nois; evidently more common westward. CAREX ALBOLUTESCENS, Schw. Ann. N. Y. Lyc. i. 66 (1824). C. straminea, var. fenea, Torr. Monogr. 395 (1836), not C. Jenea, Willd. (1809). C. straminea, var. B Gay, Ann. Sci. Nat. 2d ser. x. 362 (1838). C. leporina, var. bracteata, Liebm. Mex. Halv. 264 (1850). C. straminea, var. chlorostachys, Boeckl. Linnza, xxxix. 118 (1875). ’ Var. CUMULATA (Bailey). C. alata, var. pulchra, Olney (mostly), Exsicc. fasc. ii. No. 23 (1871). C. straminea, var. cumulata, Bailey, Mem. Torr. Bot. Club, i. 23 (1889). CAREX ECHINATA, AND ITS AMERICAN CONGENERS: The American plants which have been variously known as Carex echinata, Carex stellulata, Carex sterilis and Carex scirpoides have been the subject of more neglect than any other American carex, perhaps more, even, than any other of the older species. of our flowering plants. This lack of attention is due both to the polymorphous character of the species and to the uncertainty of a specific identification with the European plant. Every collector must have noticed that all printed descriptions of the species are singularly unsatisfactory, and that widely different forms are thrown loosely under one name. The species is not an attractive _ one at best. I have long felt that the-plant has never been un- derstood, and for two or three years I have made a special effort to collect material for study. The arrangement of this material, which I now propose, seems to solve the difficulties which have always attached to the species. The solution of the perplexities _ _ turns upon two questions: UE hy eat ‘ta . 425 1. Is the American plant identical with the European? Over thirty years ago Francis Boott questioned if the American plant is | the same as the European C. séellulata (or C. echinata), but no monographer since Muhlenberg seems to have eliminated the European species from our flora. The plants of the two conti- nents are exceedingly similar, and yet there is a facial difference between them which is nearly always apparent and often striking. Definite specific characters of separation are obscure, and yet I am convinced that they exist. The American plant is habitually taller than the European, the scales are sharper and usually longer, the perigynia are more strongly nerved and more attenu- ated or conical, and, above all, it is far more variable. The his- tory of American Carex literature is a continuous record of the Separation of American and European types. There are probably no species common to both countries, except those which are ; hyperboreal and occur through the Arctic regions of both hemi- _ spheres, being found in Greenland. There are other supposed identical species, aside from Carex echinata, which, I think, will eventually be separated in the two continents. I am satisfied that the American species under consideration can never be properly understood until it is treated independently of the European plant. 2. Is the American species monotypic? Any acute observer would at once see that our so-called Carex echinata contains two distinct general types, if the specimens were spread before him; and, fortunately, these facial attributes are reinforced by excellent specific characters. One type, to which the Carex sterilis of Will- denow and the C. scirpoides of Schkuhr belong, is characterized by distinctly long-beaked spreading or ascending winged perigynia, and loose, bushy yellowish spikes; the other; which has no name, is marked. by very short-beaked, small and. nearly wingless peri- gynia, which are spongy and more or less cordate at the base and which shell off upon the sheet, and by: more rounded or cylindri- cal greenish spikes—the terminal one often oblique—in which the _ perigynia are strongly divaricate or often bent downwards. And aside from these, the stiff and wide-fruited sea-board plant— known. as-var. conferta—will be seen to have ample specific char- acters. I have, therefore, outlined three species from the material 424 heretofore thrown loosely into Carex echinata. This, I hope, will be better than detailing a mere list of varieties which should have no coherence, and which should ‘differ from each other in the very terms by which the species is distinguished from its fellows. These plants may be outlined as follows: CAREX STERILIS, Willd. Sp. Pl. iv. 208 (1805). Sartwell Exsicc. No. 37. Boott. Ill. t. 146. C. scirpoides, Schkuhr, Riedgr. Nachtr. 19, fig. 180 (1806). | C. stellulata, vars. scirpoides and sterilis, Carey, Gray’s Man. 1848, 544. C. echinata, var. microstachys, Boeck|. Linnza, xxxix. 125 (1875). C. echinata, var. microstachya, Boeck. Flora, 1875, 563. C. echinata, var. microcarpa, Bailey, Coulter’s Rocky Mt. Bot. 395 (1885). Short, stiff and erect (usually not much exceeding a foot in height), the old leaves often persistent; head tawny or greenish-yel- low, short, composed of from three to five smalf loosish contiguous spikes, of which the uppermost is usually conspicuously attenuated at the base by the presence of staminate flowers; sometimes the terminal spike or even the whole head is entirely staminate ; peri- gynium thin and flat, conspicuously contracted into a slender beak which is nearly or quite as long as the body and spreading so as to give the spike an echinate appearance, sharp-edged and rough on the upper margins, variously nerved and very sharply toothed.—A common plant, growing in dryish bogs and swales throughout the Northern States east of the Mississippi; and I © also have it from Willow Springs, Arizona (Palmer, 548), and Mt. Adams, Oregon (Henderson). The plants of Willdenow and Schkuhr seem to have been variously understood by successive botanists, although the figures of both C. s¢erilis (fig. 146) and C. scirpoides (fig. 180) in Schkuhr’s “ Riedgraser’’ are unequivocal. I have also seen the originals of both plants. The dioeciousness of the species seem to be only an occasional state, and as I have not been able to discover other characters which uniformly ac- company it, I have thrown C. steri/is and C. scerpoides together. / Var. EXCELSIOR. : C. stellulata and C. échinata, American authors. Sartwell, _ Exsicce. no. 35. * 425 C. sterilis 8 Boott, Ill. 56, t. 146* (1858). Taller and more slender (often two feet high), the heads usually more. scattered and mostly somewhat greener—Common in wet bogs and woods, apparently in all the Northern States; occurs also in Louisiana, Mexico, and in Oregon and Vancouver Island. » Var. CEPHALANTHA (Bailey). C. echinata, var. cephalantha, Bailey, Mem. Torr: Bot. Club, i. 58 (1889). Rather stiff but slender and tall, or the top of the culm weak (1 2 feet high); head mostly continuous or more or less dense and composed of five to eight approximate (rarely scattered), large (15-30 flowered) green or greenish loose spikes, in which the mature narrow, long-beaked perigynia usually spread at nearly or quite right angles——Runs across the country from the northern borders of the United States northward, from the Atlantic to the Pacific, reaching as far south as the higher elevations in north- €astern Pennsylvania. There are two forms in this, one (the type) marked by aggregated spikes, and one by more or less scattered spikes. The latter may be worth varietal recognition. ‘Var. ancusrara (Carey). C. stellulata, var. angustata, Carey, Gray’s Man. 1848, 544. _ C.echinata, var. angustata, Bailey, Mem. Torr. Bot. Club, i. 59 (1889). Very slender, sometimes almost thread-like, weak, bearing long and narrow divaricate perigynia, which are either in loose small heads or in scattered spikes.—New England to Newfound- land. Apparently also in Montana. * CaREX ATLANTICA. C. stellulata, var. jets Chapm. Fl. S. States, 534 (1860), not C. conferta, Koch. C. echinata, var. conferta, Bailes: Carex Cat. (1884). Tall (16 to 24 inches) and very stiff and strong, the leaves broad but stiff and usually becoming somewhat involute when dry; spikes contiguous or scattered, spreading, globular or short- cylindrical, densely flowered, green; the terminal one slenderly contracted below or even entirely staminate; perigynium large and very broad (the body about as broad as long), with a distinct 496 rough, bifid beak, strongly many-nerved, especially upon the back, squarrose or usually retrorse at maturity, shelling off readily when ripe.—Follows the coast from Newfoundland to Florida; not common. It is strange that none of the earlier students of the genus discovered this distinct plant. «CAREX INTERIOR. C. scirpoides, Sartwell, Exsicc. No. 36 (1848). C. stellulata, var. scirpotdes, Boott, Ill. t. 146** (1858). Very slender, but mostly strict (1-2 feet high), the thin wire- like culms usually longer than the narrow and rather soft grass- like leaves ; head composed of two to four little globular contiguous greenish-tawny spikes, of which the terminal one is usually slenderly contracted or stipe-like below and often oblique ; peri- gynium very small and plump, the margins very narrow or almost none, lightly many nerved on the back, but usually nerve- less or nearly so on the face, prominently corky at the base, the beak ~ and the teeth very short, spreading or reflexed at maturity and easily shelling off—Bogs and swamps, in the interior country, from Maine to Minnesota and Kansas. When this plant is once understood, I am sure that its identity cannot be mistaken. The utter confusion in which our Carex echinata has always lain, must _ be the only reason why the plant was not separated long ago. Boott knew that it is distinct from C. s¢erilis, but he made the mis- take of trying to identify it with Schkuhr’s C. scirpoides. But Schkuhr’s plant, as his plate plainly shows, was a short, stiff, fulvous plant with oblong spikes and long-beaked broad-winged perigynia. ~ VAR. CAPILLACEA. Still more slender or even bristle-like in both culm and leaves, and habitually lower (sometimes 16 inches, but often only half as high); perigynium more cordate at the base and broader, strongly many-nerved upon both ssides.— Eastern Massachusetts, New Jersey and Central Pennsylvania. Perhaps specifically distinct from the last. My attention was first called to this plant some years ago by the late William Boott, who was once inclined, I think, to publish it. 427 HOMONYMOUS NAMES. _ The Committee on Nomenclature of the Botanical Club adop- ted, at Rochester, an article which declares that “the publication of a generic name or a binomial invalidates the use of the same name for any subsequently published genus or species, respec- tively.” This rule, I am instructed, is to be enforced rigidly in the forthcoming Check List to be issued officially by the Club. The committee has also decided, by a recent vote upon Carex Michauxiana and C. Michauxii as a test case, that proper names differing only in their terminations are homonymous. It is with much regret and hesitation that I apply this rule to the carices of the Check List, although I fully sympathize with it. While the necessary changes are not numerous, they involve some of our best known species. The innovations which follow as a direct or _ indirect result of the homonymy of the Check List are as follows: ’ CAREX ABACTA. C. rostrata, Michx. Fl. Bor. Am. ii. 173 (1803), not Stokes in With. Arrang. Brit. Pl. 2d ed. 1059 (1787). C. xanthophysa, vars. nana and minor, Dewey, Sill. Journ. xiii. 353, figs. 57, 58 (1828), not C. xana Lam., nor Cham. nor Boott; minor has been frequently used in the genus. C. Michauxiana, Boeckl. Linnea, xli. 336 (1877), not C. Michauxii, Schw. (1824), nor Dewey (1826). CAREX ABBREVIATA, Schw. in herb.; Boott. Linn. Trans. xx. 141 (1846); Ill. 21 (1858). C. Zorreyt, Tuckm. Enum. Meth. 21 (1843), not C. Zorreyana, Schw. (1824), nor Dewey (1826). Boott originally attributed the herbarium name adéreviata to Prescott, but it was really Schweinitz’s, and the error is corrected in Boott’s Illustrations, i. p. 21. ~CaREx Asa-GRAyI. C. intumescens, var. globularis, Gray, Ann. N. Y. Lyc. iii. 236 (1834), not C. globularis, Linn. C. Grayii, Carey, Sill. Journ. 2d ser. iv. 22 (1847), not C. Gray- ana, Dewey (1834). ~ Var. nIspipuLa (Gray). C. Grayii, var. hispidula, Gray in ‘herb: Bailey, Mem. Torr. - Bot. Club, i. 54 (1889). 428 ¥ CAREX AUSTRO-CAROLINIANA.. G, Caroliniana, pi a de Sill. Journ. xlv. 173 (1843), not. Schw. (1824). Table Mountain, South Carolina. Carex Cox.insil, Nutt. Gen. N. Am. Pl. ii. 205 (1818). C. subulata, Michx. F1. Bor.-Am. ii. 173 (1803), not Gmelin, Syst. ii. part i. 138 (1791), nor Schumch. Faell. i. 270 (1801), nor Wahl. C. Michauxu, Dewey, Sill. Journ. x. 273 (1826). » CAREX DURIFOLIA. A C. Back, Boott; Hook. Fl. Bor.-Am. ii. 210, t. 209 (1840), not C. Backana, Dewey (1836). Carex Frank, Kunth, Enum, Pl. ii. 498 (1837). C. atherodes, Frank, Hb. Unio. Itin. (1835), not Sprengel (1826). C. stenolepis, Torr. Monogr. 420 (1836), not Lessing, Reise durch Norwegen (1831). So long ago as 1843 Kunze observed that Torrey’s C. stenolepis is antedated by Lessing’s, and Gray called attention to the fact in Silliman’s Journal in 1844. CAREX LOUISIANICA. C. Halei, Carey, Chapm. Fl. S. States, 543 (1860), not Dewey (1846). Florida to Louisiana and Texas and Arkansas. CAREX MEMBRANOPACTA. Carex compacta, R. Br. Ross's Voy: Append. cxliii. (1819), not Krock. FI. Sil. iii. (1814). Carex membranacea, Hook, Parry’s 2nd. Voy. Append. 406 not Hoppe, Ic. 71. Carex saxatilis, var. compacta, Dewey, Sill. Journ. xi. 321 (1826). Arctic America. CAREX QUALICUMENSIS. C. Macounu, A. Bennett; Mace Cat Can. Pl. iv. 147 (1888), not Dewey (1866). C. salina, var? robusta, Bailey, Bot. Gaz. xiii. 87 (1888), not C. robusta, Hochst. Grows in large patches between tides in the pte of a : ‘River, Vancouver Island. / 429 CaREX WALTERIANA. C. striata, Michx. FI. Bor. Am. ii. 174 (1803), not Gilib. Exerc. Phyt. ii. 550 (1792); Boott, Ill. t. 151 (1858). Carolina to Florida. Now renamed in memory of Thomas “ Walter, author of Flora Caroliniana, 1788. ~ VAR. BREVIS (Bailey). C. striata, B Boott, Ill. 57 ( 1858). _C. striata, var. brevis, Mem, Torr. Bot. Club, i. 34 (1889). New Jersey to North Carolina. New Genera of Plants from Bolivia. By H. H Ruspsy. : (Pirates CLXVII.-CLXX.) MALPIGHIACE. Of Bentham and Hooker’s four tribes of Malpighiacee, my first genus differs from the first in its pyramidal torus; from the second in its non-climbing habit, and wingless fruits, combined with two-formed stamens and appendaged anthers ; from the third by its wingless fruits and two-formed anthers, and from the fourth by its 10 stamens, those alternate with the petals being the defec- tive ones. Its habit is certainly at agreement with the last tribe, and it would easily pass, without dissection, for a species of Cama- vea; but the androecium and general reproductive characters Separate it widely therefrom. All things considered it appears most closely related to the first tribe, where I place it, making an exception as to its gynobase, between the genera Acmanthera and Pterandra. BRITTONELLA. Caylx ample, foliaceous, somewhat accresent, deeply 5-parted, 8-glandular, the glands ovoid and of medium size. Petals 5, on short claws, concave and incurved, the margins wavy and erose- dentate, in this species at least yellow. Stamens 10, sub-distinct, of 2 forms; those opposite the petals perfect, the filaments stout, dilated downward, glabrous, their anthers affixed at the outer base, partly deflexed, slightly winged at the base and appendaged with. 430 a small point; those alternating similarly formed, but much smaller and apparently imperfect, the anthers scarcely appendaged. Carpels 3, distinct, on a short pyramidal gynobase; ovary pilose, the apex slightly 3-dentate; style ventral, linear, truncate or the stigma slightly capitellate. Nucule 2 or even only 1, irregu- larly triangular-ovate, irregularly 3 cristate at the upper portion and corrugated. Seed (immature) ventrally affixed, ovoid, pointed. Perennial, fruticulose, sub-prostrate, hirsute, with opposite gland- less leaves, and small, foliaceous stipules, similar to the leaves. Flowers solitary at the ends of the branches, peduncled. Dedicated to my distinguished friend, Dr. Nathaniel L. Britton. \z. PILOSA. Suffruticulose, 5-10 cm. high, pilose throughout ; root ~ vertical, stout; branches ascending; stipules 2-3 mm. long, 1.5-2 mm. broad, ovate, very acute, foliaceous; petioles scarcely any; leaves .75—-1.5 cm. long, .5—1 cm. broad, ovate, acute, the base rounded or subcordate, strongly veiny under- neath ; flowers about 5 mm. broad, the sepals 4 mm. long, oblong-ovate, the petals somewhat longer; fruit not mature. Collected near Cochabamba by Mr. Miguel Bang (No. 935). RUBIACEZ. Its numerous ovules, capsular fruit, solitary flowers, winged seeds, regular corolla, and embryo in albumen, fix my second genus in the Cinchonez. There being no proper bud I cannot be sure that the corolla is valvate, though it is apparently so. But the plant apparently has no affinity with any of the genera of the second section, with imbricate or convolute corolla, notwithstand- ing a certain similarity in habit with two of them. It therefore belongs in the Eucinchonee, in which, as shown by its loculicidal capsule and placente adnate to the middle of the septum, it is allied to a group of 8 genera, from each of which it is quite dis- tinct in habit and structure. It is most nearly related to Bow- vardia, and I place it between this and the little known genus Heterophyllea. LECANOSPERMA. Calyx tube ovoid-campanulate, tuberculate, the limb 5-parted, - the segments foliaceous and somewhat coriaceous, narrow. Co- rolla thick and tough, the tube elongated, very slender, the throat slightly dilated and the mouth again slightly contracted, villous within at the anther ring, the limb 5-lobed, the lobes ample, hori- zontally spreading or recurved. Stamens (dimorphous?) 5, Sle- 431 ments wanting, inserted into the base of the throat, the anthers. included, linear oblong, dorsifixed, the base entire. Disk not prominent, fleshy; ovary 2-celled; style filiform, included or barely exserted, the branches 2, linear. Placente fixed along the central portion of the septum, the ovules rather numerous in the cells. Capsule globular, costate, the calyx limb imperfectly deciduous, crustaceo-cartilaginous, imperfectly loculicidal, the sep- tum delicate, early separating from the walls to simulate a one- celled capsule. Seeds rather few, peltate, pendulous, imbricated in two ranks in each cell, circular, saucer-shaped, both as to the body of the seed and by the incurved wing. Embryo straight, in semi-corneous albumen, with well-developed caulicle and cotyle- dons. A much branched ragged shrub (or tree?) with short spine- like leafy branchlets, the leaves minute, oblong-linear, semi-fleshy, _ crowded, the stipules obscure, somewhat sheathing: Named in allusion to the striking saucer-shaped seeds. L. tyciorwes. Bark gray, branches numerous, divergent, very ~ unequal, rigid, leaves 3-5 mm. long, I-2 mm. broad, on very short petioles, elliptical-oblong, entire, thickish, below granular, roughened, with prominent mid-rib, drying blackish; flowers (color?) terminal, solitary, peduncled; calyx 4 mm. long, the lobes 3 mm. long by .5 mm. broad, strap-shaped, slightly broadened upward, thickish, obtuse, the sinuses open; corolla nearly 2 cm. long, the tube very slender, the spreading limb ' nearly 1 cm. broad, the lobes broadly ovate, acutish; fruit pendulous on stout, very tough peduncles, globular, light- brown, 6 mm. in diameter, 10-costate; seeds nearly 3 mm. broad, hispid. Collected by Mr. Miguel Bang near Cocha- bamba (Nos. 1121 and 1122). Distributed as “ Randia.” COMPOSITE. My third genus has the homogamous, tubuliflorous heads, the Sub-entire anther base, the sub-terete, obtuse, papillose style- branches, and the setose pappus of the 2d tribe, Eupatoriacee. Of its 3 sub-tribes, it has the appendaged anthers and the 5-angled akene of the Ageratee. The pappus, entirely setaceous and of numerous setz, exclude it from the Ist group of this sub-tribe. Between the 2d and 3d sections it is difficult to decide, as one of these is described as “insigniter barbellata,’ the other ‘ dbreviter barbellata.” On the whole, however, its affinities seem rather with the more strongly barbellate first section, notwithstanding that 432 Bentham relegated it to the second, as a species of Eupatorium. With none of the 6 genera of this first section does it agree. It appears to belong between (64) Agrianthus and (65) Symphyopap- pus, both Brazilian genera. Its most distinct characters are its spine-tipped involucral scales in 4 strictly vertical ranks, giving a perfectly regular quadrangularly prismatic involucre, and the very unequal rigid purple seta of the pappus. ADDISONIA. Head homogamous, tubuliflorate and panciflorate. Involucre narrow, prismatic-quadrangular; scales about 12 to 14, in 4 vertical ranks, the outer successively shorter, the outermost very small, rigid, roughened, strongly keeled, produced into a spine-like tip. Receptacle naked, elevated and prominent as an irregularly and sharply angled body. Corollas equal, tubular, the limb campanu- late, its border spreading, strongly 5-toothed. Anthers with obtuse triangular appendages and obtuse, nearly entire bases. Style-branches' long, much exserted, obtuse, distinctly dilated upward, papillose. Achenia sharply 5-angled. Pappus wholly of sete in a single series, easily detached altogether with the disc, 25-30, very unequal, rigid, stout, purple, moderately barbellate. A tough (glutinous?) shrub, with elongated, appressed, erect- spreading branches; alternate, sessile, very small, linear spatulate, fleshy, papillose leaves, and heads solitary at the ends of abbre- viated leafy branchlets, these crowded at the ends of the branches. The involucre, rigid, purple pappus and corolla characters are suggestive of Svevia, while the general habit is that of Ageratella. Specimens of the same plant, collected by Pearce, in the Kew herbarium are marked by Mr. Bentham “ Zupatorium,’ but no species is named. Genus dedicated to the honored President of the Torrey Bo- tanical Club, Judge Addison Brown. A. vircata. Branches very slender, bright brown, slightly chan- ~ nelled, the internodes shorter than the leaves; leaves 5—I2 mm. long, I-2 mm. broad, linear-spatulate, below narrowed to a petiole-like base, obtusish, very thick, grayish-green, papil- lose with prominent broad midrib; heads virgately racemed and somewhat secund, at maturity 9 mm. long, 3—3.5 mm. broad. Involucre 6-7 mm. long by 3 mm. broad, regularly tapering to an acute base; the scales rigid, lanceolate boat- shaped, above keeled, with scarious spreading margins and pungently tapering apex, finely several-nerved, papillose; flowers about 5; corolla dull yellowish-white, 5 mm. long, 5- toothed, the teeth spreading, acutish; pappus bright purple, 433 rather coarse, rigid, shortly barbellate, somewhat flexuose, very unequal, some of the sete exceeding the corolla; achenia oblong with tapering base, 2 mm. long, brown, sharply ribbed. Collected in Southern Bolivia by Mr. Miguel Bang (No. 868). Perhaps distributed as “« Chuquiragua.” VACCINIACEZ:. A conclusion as to the generic rank of my fourth and last plant is not entirely free from doubt, but I cannot conscientiously de- scribe it as a Vaccinium, the only genus which it resembles in structure. All generic divisions, both of the Vacciniacee and Ericaceze are perhaps radically wrong. We have either far too many or far too few genera. If as I consider most probable, the present living members of these families represent a vastly greater number of extinct species, then the characteristics of the anthers constitute good generic characters, and many of our sub-genera may properly constitute monotypic or small genera. If on the other hand, these characteristics are trifling, there should be a con- siderable reduction of the genera. It is greatly to be desired that the paleontology of this group should be studied out. From Vaccinium our plant differs in its absolutely solitary, many-bracted flowers, the pedicel continuous—not articulated— with the calyx, the calyx prismatic, and especially by the entire placentze. VACCINIOPSIS. Calyx continuous with the pedicel, the tube turbinate, strongly 5-angled, the limb broadly campanulate, deeply 5-toothed. Cor- olla scarlet, contracted-campanulate, strongly 5-toothed, the teeth recurved, within lightly pilose. Stamens 10, not coherent, lightly adherent to the base of the corolla, equal and similar, the filaments longish, hirsute and incurved above. Anthers adnate, coarsely Pilose, the cells obscurely muticous on the back, each abruptly contracted into a simple, straight, rigid beak which opens on the inner face by an elongated oblique pore, Disk conspicuous, elevated, cylindrical, 10-grooved with concave summit. Style stout, elongated, of uniform thickness, truncate. Ovary lightly 5- lobed, 5-celled, the placente 5, strictly simple, from the inner angles, fleshy. Ovules very numerous. Fruit not seen. A (parasitical ?) shrub, with much elongated, simple, slender branches, alternate, nearly sessile, ovate, 3-5 nerved, fleshy, pale leaves, and solitary, nearly sessile, axillary flowers, the pedicel and calyx-tube clothed with broad, appressed, imbricated scales. 454 V. ovata. Branches nearly parallel, 10-30 cm. long, 1-2 mm. — thick, channelled, the bark gray or slightly reddish gray, - glabrous, the internodes 2-8 mm. long. Petioles 1.5-2 mm. long, nearly as broad, flattened, minutely pubescent. Leaves 22.5 cm. long, I-1.5 cm. broad, ovate or some nearly oval, entire, revolute, the base rounded or very slightly narrowed, the apex with an obscure blunt point, very thick, 2 pairs of strong lateral nerves from near the base, below smooth, above rugose-reticulated; flowers, inclusive of the short concealed pedicel, nearly 1 cm. long; calyx-tubé 2 mm. long and broad, the limb 5 mm. broad, its lobes triangular-ovate, acuminate, 2 mm. broad, thick, pale and smooth like the leaves; corolla scarlet, thick, sparsely and very minutely pubescent outside, urceolate, 5 mm. long by 4 mm. broad. Collected by Mr. Miguel Bang in Southern Bolivia (No. 876). Description of Plates. Plate CLXVII. Brittonella pilosa, Rusby. (1) Typical plant; (2) flower; (3) petal, front view; (4) same, side view; (5) essential organs zz situ; (6) perfect stamen, showing face; (7) same, side view; (8) imperfect stamen; (9) gynoecium; (10) immature fruit, side view; (11) pyramidal torns with 2 sepals in background; (12) radial vertical section of fruit, ; Plate CL XVIII. Lecanosperma lycioides, Rusby. (1) Typical fruiting branch; (2) flower; (3) calyx and pistil; (4) corolla laid open to expose stamens; (5) capsule with portion removed, lateral view of placenta and seeds; (6) same, front view of placenta with seeds; (7) concave face of seed; (8) convex face of seed. % Plate CLXIX. Addisonia virgata, Rusby. (1) Typical flowering branch; (2) head in flower; (3) outermost involucral scale; (4) innermost involucral scale; ( 5) complete flower ; 6) 3 of the stamens; (7) style-branches. Plate CLXX., Vacciniopsis ovata, Rusby, (1) Typical flowering branch; (2) flower with bracted pedicel; (3) nude calyx with pistil; (4) corolla laid open to expose stamens? (5) a stamen, face view; (6) the same, side view; (8) transverse section of ovary. The Extent of the Annulus, and the Function of the different Parts of the Sporangium of Ferns in the Dispersion of Spores.* By GEo. F. ATKINSON, A study of the sporangia of the different families of ferns made to determine the character of the so-called “complete annulus” makes it necesary to place some restrictions upon the use of that term as applied to the part of the annulus concerned primarily in the dispersion of the spores. In the Polypodiacee the annulus is said to be “incom- plete.” It extends from the distal end of the stalk over the dorsum and vertex of the sporangium to the anterior upper angle. The lip cells in the front possess thickened and ligni- fied walls, and between them the line of cleavage occurs at the moment of dehiscence. Between the upper lip cell and the anterior end of the annulus are two or three cells with walls exactly like those of the lateral walls of the Sporangium. Similar cells also exist between the lower lip cell and the distal end of the stalk at the lower angle of the sporan- gium. These cells serve as connectives between the lip cells and the anterior end of the annulus on the one hand and the stalk on the other. At the moment of dehiscence they serve as a pull upon the lip cells as the annulus is everting. The lip cells being - Situated at the middle of the front divide the sporangium in halves and the line of cleavage started continues straight across the lat- eral walls of the sporangium. The connectives serve also an- other very important function. They are passive like the lateral walls and thus the halves of the sporangium remain intact while the annulus is being everted and preparing to spring. By this means the spores are held in place until the annulus springs when they are hurled violently away. In the Cyatheacez, Gleicheniacez, and shy dienepb yuancee the annulus is said to be “complete,” 2. ¢., it extends entirely around the sporangium. * The substance of this paper was s presented before the botanical section ok the A.A. A, S, at the Madison Meeting. 436 In Cyathea brunonis and Citbotium chamissot of the Cyatheacee which I have examined, divisions strictly homologous with those pointed put in the Polypodiacez are found. The true annulus, i. ¢., that portion which functions as the spring, extends from the lower anterior angle of the sporangium, backward by the side of the stalk, up the dorsum and over the vertex to the anterior up- per angle. A series of four to six lip cells similar in appearance to, but smaller than those of the true annulus, occupies the mid- dle of the front. Between two of these the line of cleavage occurs. An upper and lower connective, each consisting of two or three cells exactly like those of the lateral walls of the sporangium, in- terrupts the so-called “complete annulus.” Sporangia of both these species, which had lain in the herbarium over thirty years, when moistened with water and then dried, or treated with gly- cerine to extract the water from the cells of the annulus, opened promptly by the everting of the part of the annulus here designated as the true annulus. The spring also occurred with as much snap seemingly as might have taken place at the time of the dehis- cence of the sporangium. The entire proceeding could easily be watched under the high power of the microscope, and it was easy to see which part functioned as the spring and which part was passive. In Hymenophyllum demissum and H. ciliatum the true annulus occupies a greater portion of the circumference of the sporangium than in the Cyatheacez, but it is not complete. The short stalk is attached nearly perpendicular to the sporangium by the side of one end of the annulus. Narrow elongated lip cells are present joined to the annulus by two small connectives, and in dehiscence the sporangium is divided into halves. In the Gleicheniaceze as shown by Gleichenia emarginata the same divisions are present, but the connectives are quite large and prominent, as shown when a longitudinal section of the annulus is made. In Schizea pusilla and Aneimia Phyllitidis of the Schizeacee® elongated lip cells and small connectives are present, and the true annulus when seen in side view and in section stands out quite prominently from the other parts of ones ring of cells at the pean _ of the ovate sporangium. ? 437 In Osmunda regalis, cinnamomea, and Claytoniana, and Todea vivularis the same parts are present, the true annulus being situated upon the dorsum of the sporangium. In all these families the sporangium is divided into halves at the time of dehiscence. The true annulus, the connectives and the lip cells perform identical functions in all. Were the annulus in any of them “ complete,’ the highly developed mechanism which now serves the fern so perfectly in the dispersion of the spores would be defeated. During the eversion of a “complete” annulus the lateral walls of the sporangium would be torn to pieces and the spores would fall to the ground before the spring took plate, and the present comparatively wide dispersion could not take place. BoraNicAL DEPARTMENT, CORNELL, UNIVERSITY, Notes Upon a New Exobasidium.* The genus Axodasidium is interesting in standing almost alone . aS containing parasites in the large group Thelephoree of the Hymenomycetous Fungi. Authors have differed as to the place the genus should hold in the classification, but Saccardo ignoring the views of Schroter and others, disposes of it as above stated. He describes eleven species, eight of which according to Farlow’s Index are American. Of these only one is upon a host outside of the Heath family, namely, Exobasidium Symploci, E. & M. on Symplocos tinctoria, L. Her. The American species on Ericaceze may be tabulated with the hosts as follows: 1. Exobasidium Vaccinii (F1.} Woron. On Arbutus Mensziesii, Arctostaphylus Uva-ursi, Casstope tetra- ona, Gaylussacia resinosa, Rhododendron viscosum, Vaccinium macrocarpum, Vaccinium uliginosum, Vaccinium Vitis-Idaea. 2. Exobasidium Andromeda, Pk. On Andromeda ligustrina. 3. Exobasidium Azalee, Pk. On Rhododendron nudifiorum. | *Read before the Botanical Club, A. A. A. S., Madison, Wis., August, 1893. 438 4. Exobasidium discoideum, EI. On Rhododendron viscosum. 5. Exobasidium Cassandre, Pk. On Cassandra calyculata. 6. Exobasidium Arctostaphyli, Hark. On Arctostaphylos pungens. 7. Exobasidium decolorans, Hark. On Rhododendron occidentale, and Rhododendron viscosum. The seven species have twelve hosts, and £. Vaccinit has two- thirds of all. Three species are confined as far as yet known to a single host each, and Rhododendron viscosum bears three species. From an economic standpoint the Z. Vaccinii is the only species destructive to any crop, namely, to the cranberry. During this summer samples were sent me from Massachusetts asking for a remedy, the’young stems being much distorted b¥ the fungus. The members of the genus as a rule are conspicuous, the general characteristic being a much swollen leaf or branch. The common azalea or Pinxter flower (Rhododendron nudiflorum) is known in many places as the “Swamp apple,” because so generally ~ producing upon the tips of the branches swollen masses, large as, and superficially somewhat resembles, green apples, the work of E. Azaleg, Pk. In the same genus on Rhododendron viscosum is E. discoideum, E\\., which develops upon the under surface of the leaves large, turbinate or discoid galls two or more centemeters in diameter. The £. Vaccinii wpon some hosts causes the stem to enlarge to many times its normal size. Galls of E. Andromeda, | Pk. are cupuliform and lobed, the hollow cavity containing cottony fibers and are, as the author states,* “ lateral or rarely terminal on living branches, transforming the leaf buds.” On the 30th of May last the writer’s attention was niaracted to a group of Andromeda Mariana plants in a roadway near Farming- dale, N. J. The tips of the-stems, instead of bending somewhat to one side and hanging full of the large white corolla bells charac- teristic of the species, were bolt upright, shorter than usual and bearing capitate masses of a pale green color. Upon inspection * Twenty-sixth Report of New York State Museum, 439 these were seen to be abnormally developed stems with their ‘mis- shapen flowers in dense clusters. Some of the stems bore ordinary: flowers a few inches below the malformed tips. An examination assured me that the strange forms were due to an £xobasidium, and not being able to make it fit into any of the species described, was constrained to send specimens to Pro- EXOBASIDIUM Peck, HALs., CAUSING POLYPETALOUS FLOWERS IN ANDROMEDA MARIANA. fessor Peck, who is the author of three of the American species of Exobasidiums, including the one upon Andromeda above men- tioned. He reported it as unknown to him. It is therefore with much pleasure that this second Exodbasidium upon the Andromeda genus, the first bearing the generic name Andromeda by Professor Peck, is to be called Exobasidium Peckii,in honor of a life-long faithful laborer in American Mycology. 440 This species is remarkable in being confined almost entirely to the infloresences where it causes most extravagant enlargement and distortion of parts. Some of the single flowers are more than an inch in length and in spread of petals, the bell-shaped corolla being replaced by one that is wheel-shaped and polypetalous. A full study of all the abnormal floral organs might show points of structure of ordinary blossoms with added clearness and possibly throw light upon obscure parts. The ovary, for example, is raised a half inch or more above the receptacle and the peculiar placente greatly exaggerated. The accompanying engraving is made from a photograph of a group of a healthy and an affected branch, and shows the abnor- mally exaggerated almost polypetalous flowers in striking contrast with the corolla bells of the ordinary form. Byron D. HALSTED. RuTGERS COLLEGE, Aug. 2, 1893. A new Station for Epipactis viridiflora (Hoffm.) Reichenb, During the last summer one of my former students, Mr. H. B. Cushing, B. A., found an orchid on Mt. Royal, which, upon care- ful examination, proves to be what he at first took it for, Epipactis viridifiora. He first observed it on August 5th, growing on 4 rather dry, wooded hillside on the western slope of Mt. Royal, not far from the Cdte des Neiges road, and in the vicinity of an old garden; at that time it was just coming into bloom. On August 25th, in the same locality, and within a small area, he found thirty or forty more specimens. Most of these had already gone out of flower, and some of them had ripened their seeds. This discovery is of special interest, since, with the exception of the recently found station at Toronto,* there is no other known locality for this plant in Canada. | In 1820 and the following years, Dr. A. F. Holmes made 4 — very thorough examination of the entire Island of Montreal, yet this species does not appear in his collection, nor is it to be found * Bull. Torr. Bot. Club xx. 36. 441 in any of the more recent works, such as those of Macoun and Provancher ; and we are led to ask if this can be a recent intro- duction to our flora, or is it an old resident that has been wholly overlooked? The fact that it has not been found elsewhere in a district well known to local botanists, and that it occupies a very small tract, would seem to be opposed to the latter alternative. D. P. PENHALLOow. MonTREAL, October, 1893. Botanical Notes. Cohesion of the Filaments in Salix myrtilloides.—Dr. Masters, in his Vegetable Teratology, records two examples of the cohesion of stamens in the genus Sa/ir. He remarks, without mentioning the way in which the stamens are united, that this monstrosity exists normally in S. monandra. His other case is S. calyculata, in which Professor Anderson found the stamens joined so as to form a tube. While examining some specimens of 5S. myrtillodes, collected near Royal Oak, Oak- land county, Mich., by Dr. Wright, the fila- ments of all the stamens of the male flowers on one branch were found to be united for about two-thirds of their length, whence they separated and were developed in the usual manner. The accompanying figure shows two male flowers, the smaller one taken from anormal catkin of S. myrtilloides; the larger is from the speci- men referred to above and shows the filaments united as described. Joun K. SMALL. Notes on Cicuta maculata.*—Members of the Botanical Club are aware of the widespread belief that cultivated parsnip when running wild is supposed to be poisonous. This, I think, has been set at rest by Professor Power’s excellent investigation. Through Mr. Eugene Brown, a graduate of the Iowa Agricultural College, * Read by title before the Botanical Club, A. A. A. S. Madison meeting, August 1893, | | : 442 I was permitted last spring to examine some roots in a case in ’ which three children had consumed “Wild Parsnip.” ‘There were three boys respectively 5,7 and 9 years of age. They were taken sick about one hour after eating the “Parsnip.” The specimens sent me were excellently developed, and proved to be Cicuta macu- lata. Much of wild parsnip referred to commonly in Iowa is this species, and not the Pastinaca sativa. 1 might also report that I have eaten the wild Pastinaca sativa without injurious effects. L. H. PAMMEL. North American Fungi, Century XXX.—J. B. Ellis and B. M. Everhart. This, the 30th volume of the N. A. F., comes to hand in the neat form that has characterized all the preceding “Cen-. turies.’ The volume contains a great variety of species ranging from :cidium to Venturia,as shown by the alphabetical index. By groups, the “ Century” opens with Marasmus ramealis, col- lected in West Virginia, by L. W. Nuttall (a strong botanical name) and closes with “3,000 Hadotrichum Blasdalei, Sacc. (in literis) on Vicia gigantea, Mill Valley, Cal., May, 1893, W. C. Blasdale.” Several new species now first see the light as Physalo- spora agrifolia, E. and E., on leaves of Quercus agrifolia, Cal» W.C. Blasdale; Leptospheria occidentalis, E. and E., on Panicum Crus-galli, Kansas, E. Bartholomew. In passing it may be said that the two above named persons have furnished a large number of interesting specimens. Puecinia Blasdalei, Diet. and Hol. (No. 2989) is another new species in which the California mycologist is honored. It was found by Mr. Blasdale on (?) Adium serratum in California in May of the present year. In like manner the Kansas collector gets full credit in No. “2990 Puccinia Bartholomt, Diet. Hedwigia, 1892, p. 290.’ On Bouteloua oligostachya, Rockport, Kas., January, 1893, E. Bartholomew.” The editors of the N. A. _F. present a new rust of their own in Puccinia heterantha, E. and E., on Cnothera ovata, collected by Blasdale in California, with specimens of laboratory cultures of its Acidium, made by the dis~ coverer. Also No. 2985 Uvomyces Chlorogali, n. sp. (no authority given) on a Chlorogalum, a Blasdale-California find. There is a new smut, namely: No. 2983 Urocystis Waldsteinie, Pk. om _ Wealdsteinia fragarioides, by .C. L.. Shear,.an active worker in: : _ mycology at Alcove, N. Y. There is a good supply of the Ger# 443 cosporas, Septorias and Phyllostictas and Peronospora Corydalis, De By., is distributed. Near the last, but not least, are the teleu- tospore and ecidium forms of Gymnosporangium globosum, Farl. B. D.-H. Duplicate Binomials—My attention has recently been drawn to the use of specific names identical with the generic by H. Karsten, in his “ Deutsche Flora,” a pharmaceutical work of great value published in Berlin (?) from 1880 to 1883. As this ante- dates their acceptance in America, I here abstract those which apply to indigenous or introduced American plants. Our copy does not indicate the exact dates of the pages. Presumably the book was published in parts, and reference to an unbound copy will most likely be necessary for closer approximation than that given above. Aruncus Aruncus (L.) Karst. Deutsche Flora, p. 779. . Batatas Batatas (L.) Karst. Deutsche Flora, p. 973. Cakile Cakile (L.) Karst. Deutsche Flora, p. 663. Catalpa Catalpa (L.) Karst. Deutsche Flora, p. 927. Corallorhiza Corallorhiza (L.) Karst. Deutsche Flora, p. 448. Coronopus Coronopus (1..) Karst. Deutsche Flora, p. 673. Eragrostis Eragrostis (L.) Karst. Deutsche Flora, p. 389. Fagopyrum Fagopyrum (L.) Karst. Deutsche Flora, p. 522. Hepatica Hepatica (L.) Karst. Deutsche Flora, p. 559. Lappula Lappula (L.) Karst. Deutsche Flora, p. 979. Linaria Linaria (1,.) Karst. Deutsche Flora, p. 947. Negundo Negundo (L.) Karst. Deutsche Flora, p. 596. Opuntia Opuntia (L.) Karst. Deutsche Flora, p. 888. Petasites Petasites (L.) Karst. Deutsche Flora, p. 1062. Letroselinum Petroselinum (L.) Karst. Deutsche Flora, p, 831. Phragmites Phragmites (L.) Karst. Deutsche Flora, p. 379. Sassafras Sassafras (L.) Karst. Deutsche Flora, p. 505. Scolopendrium Scolopendrium (L.) Karst. Deutsche Flora, p. 278. Sorghum Sorghum (L.) Karst. Deutsche Flora, p. 367. — Taraxacum Taraxacum (L.) Karst. Deutsche Flora, p. 1138. Vincetoxicum Vincetoxicum (1.) Karst. Deutsche Flora, p. 1030. N. 1:-B. 444 Reviews of Foreign Literature. Revisio Generum Plantarum secundum leges nomenclature inter- nationales cum enumeratio plantarum exoticarum. Otto Kuntze (Part iii., Section 1, Leipzig, London, Milan, New York and Paris, 1893). Since the publication of the first two parts of his now famous ‘‘ Revisio,” Dr. Kuntze has traveled extensively in South America and made large collections, the enumeration of which will make the greater portion of the third part of his work. On his return from his journeyings in the spring of the present year he found the questions of botanical nomenclature opened by his first volumes still considerably unsettled, at least in Europe,and determined to add to his previous important contributions to this subject. The greater number of the pages at present noticed are taken up with the collation of everything that has been written on nomenclature during the last year and a half, with criticisms and suggestions thereon by the author, in which he naturally approves the remarks of those who have agreed with him, and pays his respects to those by whom he has been attacked. One hundred and twenty-four authors are cited and their writings abstracted nearly in full; of these, nineteen are Americans. Chapters follow on “Orthographical License,” in which a very complete list of similar but not identical generic names is pre- sented, and a long series of principles proposed to determine which should be allowed to stand and which should be rejected, illustrating Dr. Kuntze’s great linguistic attainments; on modifi- cations of the Paris Code; on “1753, die Nomenclatur der Unbe- wussten,” where he argues against the acceptance of the date of publication of the first edition of Linnaeus’ “ Species Plantarum” as the point of departure in nomenclature of genera and species, thus disagreeing with the decision of the Genoa Congress, with that of the North American botanists and of the editors of the “Index Kewensis;” on “1737, der neue Compromise,” where he indicates his present willingness to yield the 1735 date, in favor of 1737,and in this as in the preceding chapter gives a list of generic names which would be changed from those taken up in his previous ce 445 volumes. The paper closes with a proposed list of international symbols for briefly designating various features of plants and with a summary of the principles of nomenclature which he thinks should now be adopted, consisting of seventy-five articles printed in German, English and French. That Dr. Kuntze’s contributions to the science of plant nomen- clature have been the most valuable, the most voluminous and the most important ever made goes without saying. Their results however prove conclusively to our mind that uniform international agreement on all poinis is unattainable by the recommendations of congresses or persons to which the whole botanical world is expected to fully assent. We believe that uniform usage can be secured, however, by the adoption of a series of simple principles, supplementary to and explanatory of the Paris Code of 1867, by a national group of botanists’ who will carry them out to the letter to the best of their knowledge and allow no exceptions whatever to interfere. This is what the North American botanists have well begun by the legislation effected at the Rochester and Madi- son meetings of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, and the preparation and printing of the catalogue of fern and flowering plants of Northeastern America there authorized, based on these principles, which is now in press. We are more fortunate than our European brethren, inasmuch as we have no very great amount of inertia to overcome, and we have the instructive example of the previous work in just the same line by our ornithological colleagues, whose principles are re- ceiving wider and wider adhesion, and who have not deviated one iota from their rules adopted some seven years ago. Bickerings over nomenclature are practically a thing of the past among our students of the feathered race. We believe that this millenium has arrived for our botanists. That errors will now and then be made in the readjustment of names is a necessary accompaniment of the conditions, but they can readily be corrected. And this is the movement which the learned editor of the “ Journal of Botany ” facetiously and somewhat wrathfully alludes to as “the neo-American epidemic.” Well, epidemics do a great deal of good, we believe, in the elimination of the weak and facili- tating the survival of the fittest, and as to his compound adjective 446 we cannot object, for everything American is new, and long may it so remain. But what will he think some day if some feeble- minded person may happen to designate the methods which he advocates as “ palzo-Anglic ?” N. Li B. Proceedings of the Club. TuesDAY EVENING, OCTOBER 10, 1893. The President in the chair and twenty-five persons present. A communication from Mr. Hartley C. Wolle, of Bethlehem, Pa., addressed to the President, was read, presenting to the Club a copy of Turner’s Fresh Water Algae of East India, said copy hav- ing been forwarded by the author to the father of the writer, the ‘Rev. Francis Wolle, who however did not live to receive it. A communication to the Secretary from Sr. Luis Sodiro, of Quito, Ecuador, was read, accepting the honor of a corresponding membership in the Club and presenting a copy of his work on the Vascular Cryptogams of Ecuador. Dr. Britton spoke of the value — of this work. The scientific programme of the evening was then taken up, and summer experiences were related. Dr. C. C. Curtiss reported his experiences during the summer at Wood’s Holl, at Gay Head and at Casco Bay, where he col- lected many algae. Mr. John K. Small stated that he had collected in Georgia, where he had been especially interested in the mosses, but had made large general collections. He was able to report on exten- sion of the range of many species, the rediscovery of a number of rarities and the finding of a number of new species. Mr. A. A. Heller had interested himself especially in the Southern Virginia boundary, the limit of the Manual region. His most interesting work had been the addition of quite a number of plants to the Manual list, notably that of Cyril/a. He thought that in order for collectors to be successful in this region it was very necessary that they consult the proper seasons for visiting respectively the coast region, the foot hills and the mountains. 447 His.collections amounted to 13,000 or 14,000 specimens, repre- senting some 500 species. Mr. T. H. Kearney, Jr., had been collecting in Tennessee and Kentucky. He had devoted some three. months to this work and obtained more than 5000 specimens. He noted some of his more important observations. Mr. Geo. V. Nash reported collecting in the Catskills and ex- hibited specimens of several interesting species. Mr. Henry Kraemer reported upon some laboratory work, re- ferring especially to Belladonna root. He had found in the cortical tissue structures bearing all the characteristics of bast and had afterwards encountered notes by Prof. Schrenk to the same effect, and had verified the same by an examination of Prof. Schrenk’s specimens. The supposed bast could be detected only after clearing and staining. Mr. Theo. G. White had been specially occupied in geological work. At Lake Champlain he had obtained from the Potsdam sandstone a fine large fossil alga. Later, while at the World's Fair, he had made some interesting collections of the prairie flora. The President exhibited two specimens of Sofdago speciosa, one collected by himself many years ago on the line of Sixth ave., between 135th and 140th streets, where also S. vigida used to grow, the other recently collected in Westchester county by Dr. Margaret B. Wilson. ‘Dr. Britton exhibited and remarked upon some numbers of the American Botanical Register, obtained from the library of Dr, Hosack. He had not as yet been able to find any reference to this publication. Wepnespay EvENING, OCTOBER 25, 1893. Vice President Allen in the chair and twenty persons sai eg following papers were read: . “On the North American Species of the genus Physcomit- cay by Mrs. Britton. The paper was illustrated by specimens — and drawings. The genus was originally described with three species, which in Lesquereux and James’ “ Manual” had been in- creased to six. Mrs. Britton’s studies had led her to recognize eleven North American species, six of which she described as new. 448 The paper will be published in the BULLETIN at a future time, 2. “New Genera from Bolivia,” by Dr. Rusby. The paper was illustrated by specimens and drawings, and is printed in this number of the BULLETIN, Dr. Britton referred again to the copy of the “ American Botanical Register,’ which he had exhibited at the preceding meeting, stating that he had found a reference to the work in Silliman’s Journal for 1831, in the form of a prospectus where 100 colored plates of North American plants were proposed to be is- ued each year at a subscription price of $12.00. Washington was the place of publication, He also exhibited a copy of Jung and Berlese’s “ Monographie du Genre Camellia,’ and Viola Selkirkit, Amelanchier oligocarpa and Audbus setosus from the Pocono plateau of Pennsylvania. Turspay Eventinc, NovEMBER 14, 1893. The President in the chrir and thirty persons present. A letter was received from Mr. E. D. McCabe, executor of the estate of Miss Phoebe A. McCabe, stating that her herbarium had been shipped to the Club, as per previous correspondence. It contains a large number of Westchester county plants. The following persons were elected active members: S. B. Parsons, Flushing, Long Island, N. Y. Dr. G. Langman, 121 West 57th St., New York City. _ The President stated that the herbarium accumulated by the late Mr. P. V. LeRoy, formerly Curator of the Columbia College Herbarium, and long a member of the Club, was offered for sale by his daughter, Mrs. Williams, of Peekskill, N. Y. The Treasurer reported that the Club had received a bequest of $500.00 under the will of the late Isaac Buchanan, and that payment of the money was expected at some time during the coming year. The following papers were read : 1. “‘Solandi Printing and its Applications to Botany,” by Prof. Byron D. Halsted. The paper was illustrated by examples of the results obtained by the process of printing, and will be pub- lished in the December number of the BULLETIN. a 449 2. “On the Altitudinal Distribution of Appalachian Ferns,” by Mr. John K. Small. The paper was illustrated by specimens and a map, and will be published in the December number of the BULLETIN. Index to Recent Literature Relating to American Botany. Arthrophycus—Remarks on the Genus. Jos. F. James: (Journ. Cin. _ Soc. Nat. Hist. xvi. 82-86). This paper was presented before Sec. E. of the A. A. A. S. at the Madison meeting, and was noted i in the BULLETIN for Septem- ber, 1893. Asplenicas—Observaciones sobre algunos Helechos de la Tribu de las. Jose N. Rovirosa. (Naturaleza, ii. 179, illustrated). Botanical Report. Brittain and Coxe. (Bull. Nat. Hist. Soc. New Brunswick, viii. 119). Contains a list of rare plants found on a trip down the Resti- gouche, in July, 1888. Cereus Peruvianus—Die Blithe von. K. Schumann on ape Kakteenkunde, iii. 123). Composite—Achenial Hairs of. Mary A. Nichols (Bot Gaz. xviii. 378-383; one plate). Cretaceous Floras in Canada and the United States, and on some _ new Plants of this Pertod—On the Correlation of early. J.W. Dawson (Trans. Roy. Soc. Canada, x. Sec. iv. 79-93, figs. I-16. - The author begins with a review of previous work on the Cre- taceous plants of British America and their correlation with such as had been found in the United States and Greenland. The plants which are described were collected in the Cascade Coal Basin of the Rocky Mountains, and are all referred to the Kootanie formation. Angiopteridium Canmorense and Pinus an- thraciticus are described and figured as new. A. H. Cryptogame Vasculares Quitenses adiectis speciebus in aliis provinens ditionis Ecuadorensis hactenus detectis. Auctore Aloisio Sodiro S. J. (8vo, Quiti, Typis universitatis, 1893, pp. 656, with © index and 7 plates.) 450 \ In ashort introduction the author states that although the fern flora of Quito had been previously collected both by Jameson and Spruce yet so rich is it in numbers and so extensive the still unexplored parts of Equador that he has been able to contribute many new species. In 1883 he published a work entitled “ Re- censio Cryptogamarum Quitensium,” and the present one is intended not so much as an enumeration of the new species as a text-book to encourage others to further search. Hence, be- sides the Latin descriptions, there is a Spanish one for each species. The plates are all drawn from specimens in his herbar- ium, and there are keys for all the genera. This is unquestionably a valuable contribution to the literature of the ferns and their allies as well as a work of considerable importance on the local flora. E. GB; Cycad—A New. T. H. McBride (Am. Geol. xii. Baie ig "xi.) An illustrated description of a new species Bennettites Daco- tensts, allied to B. Gibsonianus, Carr., found near Minnekahta, 5. Dakota, in rocks which are probably of Lower Cretaceous age. Cypripedium montanum. J. D. Hooker eee Bot. Mag. xlix. tab. 7319.) Does our Indegenous Flora give fidence of a recent change of climate? J, Vroom (Bull. Nat. Hist. Soc. New Brunswick, Vii. 72-74.) Echinocereus Salm Dyckianus. K. Schumann (Monatsch. Kakteen- kunde, iii. 127, illustrated.) Embryo-sac in Acer rubrum—Development of the. David M. Mottier (Bot. Gaz. xviii. 375-378, one plate.) Ferns—Synoptical List. G. S. Jenman (Bull. Bot. Depart. Jamaica, Nos. 46-47, 1893.) ; Species of the genus Asplenium are described. Flora Brasiliensis—Fasciculus cxiti. Sapindacce 1. 1. Radlkofer _ (Folio, pp. 225-356, tab. 58-80.) This part is entirely eccupied with the the treatment of the genus Seyjania, of which 81 Brazilian species are recognized, most of them first made known by the author in his previous extensive — contributions to the literature of this pee eS 451 Flora Brasiliensis—Fasciculus cxiv. Orchidacee 1. A. Cogniaux (Folio, pp. 1-160, tab. 1-34.) The genera, species and tribes of Cyripediline, ee and Neottiinz are here described. Fossil Fungi. Jos. F. James (Journ. Cin. Soc. Nat. Hist. xvi: 94-98. Translated from the French of R. Ferry, in Rev. Mycologique, April (1893), 54-56.) The author has performed a good deed in presenting this translation for the benefit of American readers. He also adds a few remarks and references at the close, which were not included in the original paper... Fungus Diseases of the Sugar Beet. 1. H. Pammel (Am. Mo. Mic. Journ. xiy, 189-200. Repr. from Bulletin No. 15, lowa Agricultural Experiment Station.) Halesia—The Use of the Generic Name. N. L. Britton (Gard. & For. vi. 433, Oct. 18, 1893 ; 463, 464, Nov. 8th, 1893. Edw. L. Greene, Erythea, i. 236, Nov. 3, 1893.) The name Hadesia, P. Br., is shown to belong to a West Indian tree, now referred to Guettarda, L., and Mohria is proposed ‘to re- place the later Ha/esia, Ellis, by Dr. Britton in his communication to “ Garden and Forest,” printed in the issue of that journal of October 18th, His attention having been called to the publica- tion of a genus Mohria by Swartz in 1806 for a South African genus of ferns, and that in the attempt to correct one hononym he had inadvertently made another, Dr. Britton, in the issue. of “Garden and Forest’’ for November 8th, proposes the name Mohro- dendron. In both communications the species are named, thus effecting publication under Section 2 of the rules adopted by the Botanical Club of the American Association for the Advancement of Science at the Rochester meeting. Prof. Greene, in the issue of “Erythea ” for November 3d, proposes the generic name Carlo- mohria, this name thus having five days’ priority over Mohroden- dron. Buthe neither publishes a description of the genus nor names species belonging to it, and thus, under the same section of the Rochester rules, has not effected publication. All three of the names have been given in honor of Dr. Charles Mohr, of Mobile, Alabama. 452 Hepaticarum species nove III. F. Stephani (Hedwigia, xxxii. 204-214). .This is taken up with descriptions of new Lazzanias, among them one from Magellan, and one from Peru. Inter-twining of Tendrils. D.T. MacDougal (Bot. Gaz. xviii. 396- 397)- Notes on the tendrils of Micrampelis echinata and Partheno- cissus quinguefolia. Junipcrus—Fructification of. John G,. Jack (Bot. Gaz, xviii. 369- 3753; One plate). Lake Superior Region—A Contribution to the Flora of the. 1. S. Cheney (Trans, Wisc. Acad. ix. 233). Three hundred -and forty-five species are listed, including Musci and Hepatice. | Mamillaria radiosa,Engelm. (Monatssch. Kakteenkunde, iii. 132, illustrated), ; Marine Alge of the Maritime Provinces.: G.-U. Hay (Buil. Nat. Hist. Soc. New Brunswick, vi. 62-68). Comprises a list of 84 species with notes. Notes on a small Collection of Plants, collected in Southwest Colorado by Mr, J. Cardwell Lees. J. C. Melvill (Mem. and Proc. Man- chester Lit. and Phil. Soc. vii. 4th Ser. 214-219). Penicillium and some other Fungi. "A. L. Osborn (Amer. Month. Micros. Journ. xiv. 241-249). Philosophy of Flower Seasons—The. Wenry L. Clarke (Am, Nat. xxvii. 769, reprint). Pontederia cordata, L—The Histology of the Som of, ¥. M. Wil- cox (Journ. Cincin. Soc, Nat. Hist. xvi, 101, illustrated). © Prenanthes alba (Meehan’s Month, iii. 161, illustrated). Problematic Organisms— Studies in—No. ti, The Genus Fucoides. Jos, F. James (Journ. Cin. Soc. Nat. Hist.xvi.62-81. PI. III-V.). In this contribution the author has performed an act for which many will be grateful, He has first of all included a full transla- tion of Brongniart’s little known paper published in Mem. Soc. ‘Hist, Nat. Paris i. (1823) 301-321, entitled «Observations on Fucoides and on some other Fossil Marine Plants.’ The evil 453 which. Brongniart inevitably invited is pointed. out, viz: that the genus /ucoides as defined by him, was so broad that it was made the dumping ground for all sorts of fossils, inorganic markings and casts. About 100 different species and varieties have been included under it. Subsequent work by Brongniart and by Stern- berg is referred to, in which the attempt was made to divide fucodes into genera and sub-genera in accordance with supposed affinities with living genera. These and other described forms are criticised as to their algal affinities, and in many instances as to their organic or inorganic origin by the author, who finally ends with a list of the species which have been described under the genus Fucoides, with authority and date of publication, to- gether with the names under which they are now recognized. The author has followed the rule of priority in nomenclature, so that many changes in name may be noted. Thus Fucoides Alle- gShaniensis, Harlan (1831), becomes Arthrophycus Alleghaniensis (Harlan) and not A. Harlani, Hall (1852). The only species which the author would retain under the old genus Fucoides is F- strictus, in accordance with laws of nomenclature, one of which ‘requires that the sine Ss of a genus proposed be taken as the type of that genus.” | AH. Ruthenium Red in Plant Histology, A. B. Aubert (Am. Mo. Micr. Journ. xiv. 232). Translation and condensation of a communication to the Academie des Sciences, Paris, December 26, 1892, by Mr. A. Joly. . Salix—A Study of the Venation of. N.M. Glatfelter (Ann. Rep. Miss, Bot. Gard. v.; reprint; illustrated). Sketch of the Botany of Ireland. A.G. Moore (Journ. Bot. XXXi. 299-304). | Notes ona considerable number of Irish plants. Chapter 1 deals with the American species represented: Spiranthes Roman- soffiana, now known from several stations, Sisyrinchium angusti- folium at several Galway and Kerry localities, but not certainly indigenous, Juncus tenuis and the recently observed Polygonum sagittatum (misspelled sagittifolium), pretty clearly introduced. 454 Vacation Collecting. WW. Whitman Bailey (Bot. Gaz. xviii. 395). Notes on plants found at Little Compton, R. I. Senebiera Coronopus is reported as occurring in great abundance. Winchellia—The Genus. N. H. Winchell (Am. Geol. xii.. 209— 213, Pl. VIII., IX.). This article is based upon a specimen representing .a new Cre- taceous genus, from the Yellowstone River, of which the descrip- tion with accompanying figures was prepared by Leo Lesquereux, _who proposed to name it after the author. During the delay and uncertainity, incident to publication by the United States Geolog- ical Survey, Rev. Mr. Hertzer chose the same name, for a new genus of Carboniferous trees, in honor of Alexander Winchell. The same name was also about to be applied by another paleon- tologist to a new genus of mollusks. The details of whatever friendly controversy ensued are not given, but eventually the name was cancelled for the molluscan | genus and the name Winchellina was adopted for the Carboni- ferous tree, thus leaving the way clear for the publication of Les- quereux’s original name. The species is described and figured therefor as Winchellia triphylla. \ts affinities are with the Ber- beridacez, and in order to emphasize this there is given a figure of a leaf of Achlys triphylla, D. C., for purposes of comparison. But the matter of greatest interest connected with it is that we have in this new fossil, the leaf of a plant which belongs to an order now recognized in the fossil form for the first time in America. Further than this, a comparison of the pods of Jeffer- sonia diphylla, with certain fossil fruits from the tertiary lignites of Brandon, Vt. (originally described as Carpolites Brandonianus, Lesq.), show that these are evidently closely allied to each other, if not actually belonging to the same genus. In order that the comparisons may be readily appreciated, the illustrations include in addition to the leaves of Winchellia triphylla and Achlys triphylla the fruit Carpolithes Brandonianus, and a pod of Jeffersonia diphylla. A. H. Contributions from the Herbarium of Columbia No, to, aT VSS No. 16, No. 17, College. A Preliminary List of North American Species of Cyferus, with Descriptions of New Forms. By -N. L. Britton (1886),. 2 bie 25 cents. Cerastium arvense, L., and its North American Varieties. By Arthur Hol- lick and N. L. Britton (1887). (Out of print.) Plant Notes from Temiscouata County, Canada. By J. I. Northrop (1887). (Out of print.) A List of Plants Collected by Miss Mary B. Croft at San Diego, Texas. By N;L.Britton ‘and H. Hi Rusby (1887), 0 5 ee 25 cents. New or Noteworthy North American Phanerogams, By N. L. Britton (8388) 08 ee ee ae 25 cents. An Enumeration of the Plants Collected by Dr. H. H. Rusby in South America, 1886-1887. By N. L. Britton, (Twenty-three parts published ; not yet completed.) The Genus Aicoria of Rafinesque. By N. L. Britton (1888), . . . 25 cents. A Recent Discovery of Hybrid Oaks on Staten Island. By Arthur Hollick. C1GSG) ee ere ae eat 25 cents. A List of Plants Collected by Dr. E. A. Mearns at Fort Verde and in the Mogollon and San Francisco Mountains, Arizona, 1884-1888. By N. L. Britton. The General Floral Characters of the San Francisco and Mogollon Mountains and the Adjacent Region. By H. H. Rusby (1888),. . ... 25 cents. Contributions to American Bryology—An Enumeration of the Mosses Col- lected by Mr. John B, Leiberg in Kootenai County, Idaho. By Elizabeth G. Britton. (Out of print.) ; Preliminary Notes on the North American Species of the Genus 77ssa, Adans, - By Noi. Britton (3880) 6 es 6S . «25 cents. The Genus Zéeocharis in North America. By N. L. Britton (1889), 25 cents. New or Noteworthy North American Phanerogams, II. By N. L. Britton CSG et eee Pee a ees . . . 25 cents. A List of State and Local Floras of the United States and British America. By IN, Li Bln (8890), 20 ee ee ee Le A Descriptive List of Species of the Genus Heuchera. By Wm. E. Wheel- Ole TiS era ee es 8 25 cents. New or Noteworthy North American Phancogiuie: Ill. By N. L. Britton OS ica kt ak as ee ee oe eae ee 25 cents. The Flora of the Desert of Atacama. By Thos. Morong (1891), 25 cents. No. 18. Contributions to American Bryology, II. A supplementary Enumeration of Mosses collected by Mr. John B. Leiberg in-Kootenai County, Idaho. By Elizabeth G, Britton (1891), . . 2... ++ +e + ee + + . 25 Cents. No. 19. No, 22. No. 23. No. 24. pe No. 26. No. 27. No. 28. No. 29. No. 30. No. ai, No, 32. No. 33 No, 34- No. 35. No. 36. No. 37- No. 38. No. 39. Notes on North American Halorage. By Thos. Morong (1891), .25 cents. New or Noteworthy North American Phanerogams, IV. By N. L, Britton. CHOOT yea a ee es ee eae see ee 25 cents. Notes on the North American Species of Eriocauleez, By Thos. Morong CUNO ee ee es at ate 25 cents. New or Noteworthy North American Phanerogams, V. By N. L. Britton CRO a i Or eae we a ee 25 cents. The American Species of the Genus Anemone and the Genera which have been referred to it. By N. L. Britton (1891),. .... 2. 5 25 cents. Review of the North American Species of the Genus Xyris. By Heinrich ON a ir ae he Ge ba ae 25 cents. A Preliminary List of the Soden of the Genus J/eisomia occurring in the United States and British America. By Anna M. Vail (1892), . 25 cents. A List of Species of the Genera Scirpus and Rynchosfora occurring in North America, By WN, 1, Britton:(189@),, 0 nis ees we 4 25 cents. Note on a Collection of Tertiary Fossil Plants from Potosi, Bolivia. By N. EA, ROR, CUI ge peek fie eo Lee bac let vey 25 cents, The Anatomy of the Stem of Wistaria Sinensis. By Carlton C. Curtiss CIROS irk 2555 0 tein he cee i hs at - + . . 25 cents. New or Noteworthy North American Thihcconsiaa VI. By N. L. Britton mee 6 eS Bp yes a ese ik Rp ace pee eames 25 cents. Ranunculus repens lev its Eastern North American Allies. By N. L SEMA CRO les ois els eid 0% eee » . 25 cents. A Preliminary List of American Species of Polygonum, By John K. Small. CIOON ee 8 oe cae ee oie ac ate Sh aes te eee 25 cents. West Virginia Mosses. By Elizabeth G. Britton (1892), .. . . 25 cents. A New Species of Listera, with Notes on Other Orchids. By Thos. Morong. (1893), PR Be ae eB Beas eS ok ae C6 Pi ae ee . 25 cents, The North American Species of Lespedeza. By N. L. Britton (1893) 25 cents. An Enumeration of the Plants Collected by Dr. Thos. Morong in Paraguay 1888-1890, By Thomas Morong and N. L. Britton, with the assistance of Miss Anna Murray Vail (1892-1893)... . . 2.) 0 ee ee ee $1.50. An Examination of the Seeds of some Native Orchids. By Carlton C. Curtiss (1893), je $j eg he sce Bae paeiin meget 25 cents: Further Notes on American Species of Polygonum. By John K, Small (1893). 35 aus s he Write 4d Vien Ss th Soe ene e 25. conte: New or Noteworthy North American Phanerogams, VII. . By N. L. Britton IOUS 2 98 ee oo ed ee Oe RE » 25, cents. Contributions to American Bryology, III.—Notes on the North American Species of Orthotrichum. By Elizabeth G. Britton, . . . . « , 25 cents. The whole series with the exception of Nos. 2, 3, 6 and 1o will be supplied for $5. ‘Copies of the Catalogue of Plants found in New Jersey (1889), by N. L. olga may be had for $2. Address _. DR. THOS. MORONG, Curator of the Herbarium, Columbia College, NEW YORK CITY. y BULLETIN OF THE TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB.—PLATE CLXVII. BRITTONELLA PILOSA, RUSBY. | BULLETIN OF THE TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB,—PLATE CLXVIII, a PZ NW YZ LECANOSPERMA LYCIOIDES, RUSBY. BULLETIN OF THE TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB.—PLATE CLXIX. 4 ag Mca) Ways dh ADDISONIA VIRGATA, RUSBY. —PLATE CLXX, BULLETIN OF THE TORREY eee VACCINIOPSI SOVATA, RUSBY. F. W. DEVOE & CO. ESTABLISHED 1852. OFFICES, CORNER FULTON AND WILLIAM STREETS, New York. ARTISTS’ - ATERIALS.» Sketching Outfits of All Kinds. Tube Colors, Water Colors, Crayons, Drawing Paper. Canvas, Brushes, Oils and Mediums. Mathematical Instruments, House Painters’ Colors. Fresco Colors. Fine Varnishes. CORRESPONDENCE INVITED CATALOGUES OF OUR DIFFERENT DEPARTMENTS TO RESPONSIBLE PARTIES. COFFIN. DEVOE & CO,, 176 RANDOLPH ST. CHICAGO. PLANTS OF PAR AGUAY. Two Partial Sets of my PARAGUAY PLANTS remain undis- tributed and are offered for sale at $10 PER HUNDRED SPECIMENS. THOMAS MORONG, COLUMBIA COLLEGR, NEw YORK CITY. ~ WILLIAM WALES, Fort Lee, N. J., MANUFACTURER OF FIRST-CLASS MICROSCOPE OBJECTIVES. MICROSCOPES FURNISHED OF ALL MAKES—ZENTMAYER’S AL- WAYS ON HAND. INSTRUMENTS ORDERED IN NEW YORK CITY SENT ON APPROVAL. DISCOUNT TO COLLEGES. FOR SALE.«-:: A ZENTMAYER PORTABLE MICROSCOPE, IN PERFECT ORDER, For $100.00. -_ - - Catalogue Price,.$147.50. Including THREE OBJECTIVES, 14 in., 3 in., and } in. Also an Abbé Condenser, Glass Stage, and Neat Walnut Case. Address the Editors of the Bulletin, °° Wm. Wales, Fort Lee, N. J. CHARACEA OF AMERICA. The first fascicle of the Second Part of the Characez of America is now ready. It contains descriptions of eight species of Mite//a, as fol- lows: JVitella opaca, Ag.; obtusa, Allen; montana, Allen; Blankin- ship, Allen; A/tssouriensis, Allen; flexilis, Ag.; subglomerata, A. Br. ; glomeruiifera, A. Br., with fourteen full-page illustrations (eight litho- graphic plates and six photogravures). ‘These fascicles will be issued from time to time as plates can be prepared; price of each part $1, the -actual cost, if the whole edition of 500 copies be sold. Address gt 5 El 2g Es aE i 8 8 ns 10 East 36th St., N. Y. MISSOURI PLANTS. The undersigned has over 1,000 Species of Missouri Plants for sale, including collections recently made in the southern part of the State. All good specimens. Price, $8.00 per 100 Specimens. HENRY EGGERT, 918 Wash Street, - - - St. Louis, Mo. KENTUCKY PLANTS. The undersigned offers for sale Sets of his Plants collected in Southeastern Kentucky during the past summer. The Sets aver- age about 250 Species, and will be sold at/the rate of $8.00 per roo. T. H. KEARNEY, Jr., Columbia College, - - - - New York City. ESTABLISHED 1851. EIMER & AMEND, MANUFACTURERS AND IMPORTERS OF Chemicals and Chemical Apparatus, 205, 207, 209 & 211 Third Ave., Corner of r8th Street, NEW YORK. SOLE AGENTS FOR THE UNITED STATES _ OF NORTH AMERICA, FOR rae EB. March’s Szline Chemical Stone o Schleicher & Schuell’s ‘Chemically ade Pure and Common Filter Paper. ters (Polariscopes). . ; | Prof. Jolly’s Specific Gravity Bal- “ances, etc. ase 1 Le Brun F. Desmontes & Co,, of x | Paris, Platinum.— H. Tronesdorft” s C, P. Chemicals. SPECIALTIES: 2 fprecceacuiiel “Apparatus, Normal Graduated Glo ware, Porcelain from the Royal Berlin and Meissen Factories, Bohem- a ian and German Glassware, Filter Papers, Agate Mortars, Pare. _. Hammered Platina, Balances and Weights, Copperware, Bunsen’s Burners and Combustion Furnaces, eee and Chena 2 for Sugar —— LABORATORY ouTF iTS. : FOR FERTILIZERS, ASSAVERS, “UNIVERSITIES 4 AND - COLLEGES, Doctor C. Scheibler’s Grchaiomee 5 : - PUBLICATIONS OF THE CLUB. (z) THE BULLETIN. : This journal has been published consecutively since 1870, beginning with han oa monthly, gradually increasing, until in 1892 over 32 pages monthly with many full page illustrations were issued. The subscription price is $2 perannum. Terms for England and the Continent of Europe, 1o shillings. Agents for England, Messrs. Dutau & Co., 37 Soho Square, London, England. ee : Back Numpers.—The BULLETIN was published from 1870 to 1875, inclusive, in yearly volumes, and was indexed at the end of the five years. The price of these — ee five volumes is $5.00. The numbers from 1875 to 1879, inclusive, were allowed to Sere rum on as one volume (Vol. VI.), and were indexed at the end of the five years. _ The price of this volume is $5.00. Volumes VII. to XVII. have been indexed "separately, and a general index to them printed in pamphlet form, which may be had _. for 50 cents. The price of each is $1.00. Vols. XVIII. and XIX. are indexed Peles grt separately. Price, $2.00. Vol. VIII. cannot now be nie complete, but it is e ; ere planned | to reprint some of its numbers. ah as (2) THE MEMOIRS. So the Se Website price is fixed at $3.00 per volume in advance. The numbers ie also be purchased singly and an invariable price will be fixed for each. _ Volume T contains the following papers: No. 1.—Stndies of the Types of various Species of the Genus. Carex, by Prof. L H. Bailey. This cannot now be had separately. ‘No. 2.—A List of the Marine Algz hitherto observed on ihe Coasts of Bia 2 Jersey and Staten Island, by Isaac C. Martindale. Price, 50 cents, No. 3—An Enumeration of the ‘Hepaticse collected: by Dr. H. H. Rusby in South oe et Seine of many 2 new apes ba Dr. Richard a te! ‘es Y je bing: alata . “- No: 4—On eects Fruits, . Dr. E. Lewis Sturtevant. _ Price, 50, cents. . Volume TI contains the following papers: fs Nov h==On Reserve Food Materials i in Buds Sad Surrounding Parts, with two lates, by Professor Byron D. Halsted. Price, 5o cents - No. 2,—Contributions to the Botany of Virginia, with two plate, by ‘Anna : Murray Vail and Arthur Hollick. Price, 75 cents. | No. 3.—Studies in the Germination ot — North ‘American Plants,» wil ete Speech Holm. Price, $1.00. | iad OFFICERS FOR 1893. Pectin ‘HON. ADDISON BROWN. Vice Presidents, _ THOMAS: MORONG, boi Dd. “Corresponding pallens JOHN K. SMALL, - ‘Columbia College, New York Gir. T reasurer, HENRY OGDEN, BULDGLETIN TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB. The Altitudinal Distribution of the Ferns of the Appalachian Mountain System. By JOHN K. SMALL. The following paper is a small portion of the results obtained in collecting and tabulating the altitudes observed and recorded for the plants of the East American Flora. The work was fin- ished last winter, but was then, and is still, withheld from publica- tion in order that more observations may be secured. It is too incomplete as yet to furnish any exact conclusions, and this part is here presented for the purpose of calling attention to this still almost entirely unknown department of Eastern North American Botany. Careful and systematic altitudinal observations of plant sta- tions have for a long time been recorded in England, and in the — last few years the work has been prosecuted to some extent by _ Dr. C. Hart Merriam and his assistants in the pursuit of his bio- logical survey for a portion of Arizona, especially in the vicinity of San Francisco Mountain. But in the eastern part of our con- tinent, where the floral features are perhaps better known than anywhere else in North America, there is practically nothing on record concerning it. It is hoped that this preliminary contribu- tion will excite an interest in the subject among our botanists and lead them to observe and record, as nearly correct as pos- sible, the altitudes of the plants with which they may meet, especially in the Farr Mountain aula and the contigu- — ous edeset ~ 456 A tentative attempt has been made to correlate the distribu- tion of the following ferns with the faunal distribution as worked out by Dr. J. Allen (Geographical Distribution of North American Mammals, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. iv. 199-244 (1892)), and I have used the terms applied by him there to faune for flore. In the main, the distribution of ferns appears to agree with that of mammals, but there seem to be some discrepancies which further observations may tend to reduce. Dr. Allen has divided and subdivided the faunal areas of North America into Realms, Regions, Subregions, Provinces, Subprovinces, Districts and Faune. The latter only need concern us at present, and of his eleven faunz four cover the territory under considera- tion. These are known as the CANADIAN, the ALLEGHANIAN, the CAROLINIAN, and the LouIsIANIAN, and their geographic limits in the following lines are taken from Dr. Allen’s paper already men- tioned; however, their western portions are not considered here. 1. The CanapiAN Fora includes the northern half of New England, Northern Ontario, New Brunswick, Quebec, and the southwestern angle of Newfoundland. In addition to this more or less connected area, it is represented by detached tracts of greater or less extent along the summits of the Appalachian Mountain System as far south as Georgia. 2. The ALLEGHANIAN Frora is bounded on the north by the Canadian, and on the south by the Carolinian. It runs southward as an irregular belt on the upper slopes of the mountains, separat- ing the Canadian from the Carolinian. 3. The Carouinian Fiora meets the Ad/leghanian on the abies in Pennsylvania, New York and New Jersey, and doubles the moun- tain system where the latter runs out in Northern Alabama and Georgia. It passes into the plains on the west and on the east descends into the pene-plains, reaching the Atlantic Ocean from Virginia to New York, and separated from the water from Vir- ginia southward by the Lowiszanian. 4. The Louisianian Fora includes all the Southern States south of the Carolinian except the extreme end of South Florida. Now, what I hope to be able to work out in the future is: 1,—how far the Canadian flora descends down the slopes from the __ - summits of our highest mountain peaks ; 2.—at what altitude the : Perna | Canadian meets the Alleghanian flora along the upper slopes, and hhow far the latter extends down the mountain sides; 3.—the alti- tude to which the Carofinian rises to meet the Aleghanian ; 4.— the line where the Louisianian and the Carolinian come together. This can be done only by the collection and tabulation of an im- Mense number of altitudinal observations on all the plants of Eastern North America, and I take occasion through this channel to ask my fellow botanists to note and record careful observations when in the field, and report to me at their convenience. Of course, the areas, belts or lines, as the case may be, will be affected by local conditions, and are influenced in the same way by the latitude as well as the altitude, the latter being a more or less perfect exhibition of the former in a perpendicular manner. On account of the influence of latitude the lines which bound the different areas will, if we start at the north and go south, gradually converge towards the mountains and rise towards the summits as the latitude decreases. If the direction be from south to north the lines will descend from the highlands and diverge at angles or curves from the mountains, expanding into broad areas towards the north. The problem is, as already stated, to locate these lines. With the assistance of data at hand and the geographic dis- tribution, the ferns as given below have been placed each in its respective flora or floras, and by the aid of altitudes the direction of the lines can be seen in a general way. - Potypopium potypopioipEs (L.) A. S. Hitchcock. (Polypodium incanum, Swartz.). Ranges from sea-level, from Virginia Beach, Va. (Britton) to Florida and the Gulf coast to 4,000 feet on Blowing Rock Mt., N. C. (Small & Heller); occurs at 1,000 feet in Winston county, Ala. (Mohr); at 3,000 feet at Estatoah Falls, Ga. (Small); at 2,100 feet at Marion, Va. (Miss Vail). [| Southern Carolinian ; Louisianian.| PoLypopiuM VULGARE L. Ranges from sea-level along the At- lantic coast, from Central New Jersey northward to 5,800 feet on Grandfather Mt., N. C. (Small & Heller); occurs at 1,000 feet in Winston county, Ala. (Mohr); at 3,000 feet in Rabun county, Ga. (Small); at 5,678 feet on White Top Mt., Va. (Small); at 2,700 feet in Garrett county, Md. (J. D. Smith); at 458 2,300 feet on the Pocono Mt., Pa. (Porter); at 2,100 feet near Onteora, N. Y. (Miss Vail); at 4,000 feet in Northern Ver- mont (Pringle). [Cavolinian ; Alleghanian ; Canadian. | CHEILANTHES ALABAMENSIS (Buckl.) Kunze. Occurs at 450 feet in Bibb county, Ala. (E. A. Smith); at 600 feet near Flor- ence, Ala. (Mohr); at 1,000 feet in Lawrence county, Ala. (Mohr). [Carolinian, ] CHEILANTHES TOMENTOSA Link. Occurs at 600 feet near Florence, _ Ala. (Mohr); at 1,900 feet in Swain county, N.C. (Beardslee & | Kofoid); at 1,000 feet at Toccoa Falls, Ga. (Small); at 1,500 feet on the highest ridge in Talladega county, Ala. (Mohr). [Carolinian.| : CHEILANTHES LANOSA (Michx.) Watt. (Chetlanthes vestita, Swartz.) Ranges from near sea level along the Atlantic coast from New York southward to 1,900 feet in Swain county, N. C. (Beardslee & Kofoid); occurs at 750 feet in Gwinnett county, Ga. (Small);. 800 feet at in Cullman county, Ala. (Mohr); at 1,000 feet at Roanoke, Va. (Britton); at 1,500 feet at Harper’s Ferry, Md. (J. D. Smith); at 250 feet in Lancaster county, Pa. (Porter). [Alleghanian; Carolinian. ? | PELLEA ATROPURPUREA (L.) Link. Ranges from 150 feet at Tuckahoé, N. Y. (Mrs. Britton) to 2,200 feet in Smyth county, Va. (Small); occurs at 1,000 feet in Ala. (Mohr); at 2,000 féet on Mt. Willoughby and Mt. Horr, Vt. (Faxon). [Alleghanian.] PELLAA GRACILIS (Michx.) Hooker. Ranges from 2,000 feet in Sullivan county, Pa. (C. E. Smith) to 2,500 feet on Mt. Wil- loughby, Vt. (Faxon), descends to 100 feet in Northern Ver- mont (Pringle). [ Adleghanian.] Preris Aguitina L. Ranges from sea level along the Atlantic coast to 5,000 feet on Grandfather Mt., N. C. (Small and Heller); occurs at 3,000 feet in Rabun county, Ga. (Small); at 3,500 feet on the Iron Mts., Va. (Mrs. Britton); at 2,700 feet in Garrett county, Md. (J. D. Smith); at 2,300 feet on the Po- cono Plateau, Pa. (Porter); at 1,200 feet at Westmore, Vt. (Deane); at 1,200 feet at Jaffrey, N. H. (Deane). [Canadian, Alleghanian, Carolinian, Louistanian.| re Avinatum Capitius-VeEneris L. Ranges from sea level in Flor- 9 ida to 250 feet in Central Alabama (Mohr); occurs at 700 feet 459 at South Pittsburg, Tenn. (Middleton); at 1,3000 feet at Cum- berland Falls, Ky. (J. D. Smith). [Lowisianian; Carolinian.] ADIANTUM PEDATUM L. Ranges from sea level, along the Atlan- tic coast from New Jersey northward, to 5,000 feet on White Top Mt., Va. (Small); occurs at 1,000 feet in Northern Ala- bama (Mohr); at 1,200 feet near Toccoa Falls, Ga. (Small); at 4,000 feet on Blowing Rock Mt., N. C. (Small and Heller); at 2,700 feet in Garrett county, Md. (J. D. Smith); at 2,000 feet near Onteora, N. Y. (Miss Vail); at 1,000 feet at Franconia, N. H. (Faxon); at 2,500 feet in Willoughby Mt.,-Vt. (Faxon). [Carolinian ; Alleghanian.] WoopwarDIA AREOLATA (L.) Moore. Ranges from sea level along the Atlantic coast to 3,000 feet in the Great Smoky Mts., N:-C, (Beardslee & Kofoid); occurs at 800 feet near _ Cullman, Ala. ( Mohr). [Louzstantan ; Carolinian; Alleghanian. | WoopwarpiA Vireinica (L.) Smith. Ranges from sea level along the Atlantic and Gulf coasts to 1,300 feet in Huntingdon county, Pa. (Lowrie); occurs at 200 feet near Colchester, Vt. (Pringle) ; at 300 feet at Belchertown, Vt. (Jesup). [Loudsian- tan; Carolinian; Alleghanian.] ASPLENIUM ACROSTICHOIDES Swartz. Ranges from near sea level along the Atlantic coast, from New Jersey northward to 5,000 feet on White Top Mt., Va. (Mrs. Britton); occurs at 2,700 feet in Garrett county, Md. (J. D. Smith); at 2,000 feet at On- teora, N. Y. (Miss Vail); at 1,000 feet at Amherst, Vt. (Brainerd); at 1,500 feet at Willoughby, Vt. (Rusby). [Ade- ghanian.| ASPLENIUM ANGUSTIFOLIUM Michx. At 200 feet in Vermont (Pringle); ascends to 1,000 feet at Danville, Vt. (Faxon); occurs at 3,700 feet on Blue Mt., N. Y. (Miss Knight); at 1,200 feet in Blair county, Pa. (Porter); at 1,000 feet in Win- ston county, Ala. (Mohr). [Aleghanian.] ASPLENIUM BrapLeyi D.C. Eaton. At 1,600 feet on Lookout _ Mt., Ala. (Mohr) ; descends to 1,000 feet at Stone Mt., Ga. _ (Small) ; to 260 feet i in Lancaster county, Pa. (Small). oes bees : oe 460 ASPLENIUM EBENOIDES R. R. Scott. Ranges from sea level at Philadelphia, Pa. (Scott), to 1,400 feet at Mt. Crawford, Va. (Heller); occurs at 400 feet in Hale county, Ala. (Miss Tut- wiler); at 300 feet near Easton, Pa. (Porter, Small); at 500 feet in Sussex county, N. J. (Rusby); at 700 feet near Canaan, Conn. (Adam). [Adleghanian.] ASPLENIUM FONTANUM (L.) Bernh. Occurs at about 600 feet above Williamsport, Pa. (McMinn). ASPLENIUM FILIX-FazMINA (L.) Bernh. Ranges from sea level along the Atlantic coast to 6,000 feet on Grandfather Mt., N. C. (Small & Heller); occurs at 800 feet in Cullman county, Ala. (E. A. Smith); at 5,000 feet on White Top Mt., Va. (Mrs. Britton); at 2,700 feet in Garrett county, Md. (J. D. Smith); at 2,000 feet at Onteora, N. Y. (Miss Vail); at 2,000 in Northern Vermont (Brainerd, Rusby). [Lowisianian ; Caro- linian ; Alleghanian ; Canadian.) ASPLENIUM MONTANUM Willd. Ranges from Northern eines vania to Georgia along the mountains, descends from 4,500 feet on Grandfather Mt., N. C. (Small & Heller) to 260 feet in Lancaster county, Pa. (Porter); at 1,600 feet on Lookout Mt., Ala. (Mohr); at 1,500 feet in Georgia (Small); at 2,700 feet in Garrett county, Md. (J. D. Smith); at 1,500 feet on Mt. Tam- many, N. J. (Knipe). [ Adleghanian.] ASPLENIUM PARVULUM Mart. & Gal. Ranges from near the At- lantic coast, from Florida to Virginia, to 2,400 feet in Smyth county, Va. (Small); occurs at 1,000 feet in Lawrence county, Ala. (Mohr); at 1,700 feet near Johnson City, Tenn. (Porter). [Louisianian, Carolinian.| — ASPLENIUM PINNATIFIDUM Nutt. Ranges from sea level at Phila- delphia, Pa. (Nuttall) to 4,300 feet on Grandfather Mt., N.C. . (Small & Heller); occurs at 600? feet in Blount county, Ala. (J-. D. Smith); at 1,500 feet at Stuart, Va. (Heller); at 1,500 feet at Harper's Ferry, Md. (J. D. Smith); at 300 feet in Eastern Pennsylvania (Porter). [Adleghanian.] ASPLENIUM PLATYNEURON (L.) Oakes. Ranges from sea level © along the Atlantic coast to 4,200 feet on Blowing Rock Mt., a eo aN (Small & Heller); occurs at 2,000 feet in Rabun county, ; 461 Ga. (Small); at 2,700 feet in Garrett county, Md., (J. 2. Smith); at 2,000 feet in Monroe county, Pa. (Porter); at 500 feet in Vermont (Brainerd, Pringle). [Alleghanian; Caro- lintan. | ASPLENIUM Ruta-murARIA, L. Ranges from Vermont to New Jersey at about 300 feet; occurs at 1,600 feet on Lookout Mt., Ala. (Mohr); at 1,500 feet at Warm Springs, N. C. bye 8 Se Smith); at 2,100 feet at Marion, Va. (Judge Brown); at 250 feet in Northampton county, Pa. (Porter); at 2,200 feet on Mt. Willoughby, Vt. (Faxon). [Adeghanian.] ASPLENIUM TRICHOMANES, L. Ranges from near sea level from New Jersey northward to 2,500 feet on Mt. Mansfield and Mt. Horr, Vt. (Faxon); occurs at 2,000 feet on the Pocono Mt., Pa. (Porter); at 2,100 feet in Smyth county, Va. (Small); at 1,000 feet near Gadden, Ala. (Mohr). [AMeghamian.] ASPLENIUM VIRIDE, Hudson. At 4,000 feet on Mt. Mansfield, Vt. (Pringle) descends to 2,000 feet in Smuggler’s Notch, Vt. (Faxon). [Canadian ; Alleghanian ?.] SCOLOPENDRIUM SCOLOPENDRIUM (L.) Karst. (Scolopendrium vul- gare, Smith.) Ranges from about 800 feet in Onondago county, N. Y. (Pursh and others) to 700 feet near South Pitts- burg, Tenn. (Cheatham). [ Alleghanian ; Carolinian.| CAMPTOSORUS RHIZOPHYLLUs (L.) Link. Ranges from sea level in New Jersey and New York to 3,000 feet near Blowing Rock, N. C. (Small and Heller); occurs at 2,500 feet in Smith county, Va. (Small); at 100-500 feet in Northern Vermont (Faxon, Brainerd). [Carolinian; Alleghanian.] Puecopreris Dryopreris (L.) Fee. Ranges from 500? feet in Western New Jersey to 2,000 feet at Onteora, N.Y. (Miss Vail); occurs at 1,000 feet in Hampshire county, W. Va. (J. D. Smith) ; at 1,100 feet in Luzerne county, Pa. (Heller); at 1,300 | feet at Westmore, Vt. (Deane); af 2,000 feet at Randolph, N. H. (Churchill). [Adleghanian.] PHEGOPTERIS HEXAGONOPTERA (L.) Fee. Ranges from near sea- level along the Northern Atlantic coast to 4,000 feet on Roan Mt., N. C. (Britton); occurs at 600 feet at Florence, Ala. — 462 (Mohr); at 2,400 feet near Marion, Va. (Mrs. Britton) ; at 2,700 feet in Garrett county, Md. (J. D. Smith); at 500 feet in Northern Vermont (Brainerd). [Louzseanian ; Carolinian ; Alleghanian. | PHEGOPTERIS PHEGOPTERIS (L) Underw. (Phegopteris polypodioides Fee.) Ranges from 600 feet at Newton, N. J. (Miss Thomp- son) to 4,000 feet in Northern Vermont (Pringle); occurs at 2,000 feet in Monroe county, Pa. (Mrs. Britton); at 2,200 feet at Onteora, N. Y. (Miss Vail); at 2,500 on Willoughby Mt., Vt. (Rusby). [Alleghanian ; Canadian.) Dryopreris Boorrn (Tuckerm.) Underw. Ranges from sea level from New Jersey to Massachusetts, to 2,000 in Northern Ver- mont (Brainerd). ‘[Alleghanian.| Dryopteris cristata (L.) A. Gray. Ranges from near sea level, from New Jersey northward, to 2,700 feet in Garrett county, Md. (J. D. Smith); occurs at 2,000 feet on the Pocono Mt., Pa. (Porter); at 1,200 feet at Jaffrey, N. H. (Deane); at 1,300 feet at Westmore, Vt. (Deane). [Carolinian ; Alleghanian. | _ Dryopreris crisrara, var. Cuinroniana (D. C. Eaton) Underw. _ Ranges sea level from New Jersey northward to 1,300 feet at Westmore, Vt. (Deane). [Carolinian; Alleghanian.] DRYOPTERIS FRAGRANS (L.) Schott. At 2,000-4,000 feet on Mt. Mansfield, Vt. (Faxon); descends to 750 feet near Shelburne, N. H. (Deane); to 400 feet on cliffs, Vt. (Pringle). [Cana- dian ; Alleghanian.] Dryorteris Gotpreana (Hook.) A. Gray. Ranges from near sea level northward, (100 feet, Vt. (Pringle)), to 5,000 feet on White _ Top Mt., Va. (Britton); occurs at 3,500 feet in Swain county, N. C. (Beardslee and Kofoid); at 2,700 feet in Garrett county, Md. (J. D. Smith); at 1,200 feet in Blair county, Pa. (Porter) ; at 2,500 feet on Willoughby Mt., Vt. ‘Faxon). [AUeghanian; — Canadian. | DRYOPTERIS MARGINALIS (L.) A. Gray. Ranges from sea level along the Atlantic coast from New Jersey northward to 5,000 © feet on White Top Mt., Va. (Small); occurs at 1,800 feet on Lookout Mt., Ala. (Mohr); at 4,200 feet on Blowing Rock Mt, 463 N.C. (Small and Heller); at 2,700 in Garrett county, Md. (J. D. Smith); at 2,000 feet at Onteora, N. Y. (Miss Vail); at 1,000 feet in Northern Vermont (Brainerd). [Lowistanian ; Carolin- tan, Alleghanian; Canadian. | Dryopreris Novesoracensis (L.) A. Gray. Ranges from sea level along the Atlantic coast, from N. C.,northward,to 5,000 feet on White Top Mt., Va. (Mrs. Britton); occurs at 650-900 feet in Northern Alabama (Mohr); at 2,200 feet, near Marion, Va. (Mrs. Britton); at 2,700 feet in Garrett county, Md. (J. D. Smith); at 2,000 feet on the Pocono Mt., Pa. (Porter); at 2,200 ft., Onteora, N. Y. (Miss Vail); at 1,500 feet in Northern Vermont (Brainerd). : [ Alleghanian ; Canadian? | DRYOPTERIS SPINULOSA (Retz.) Kuntze. Ranges from near sea level in New York and New Jersey to 2,600~5,000 feet on White Top Mt., Va. (Mrs. Britton); occurs at 2,700 feet in Garrett county, Md. (J. D. Smith); at 2,200 on the Pocono Mt., Pa. (Porter); at 2,000 feet at Onteora, N. Y. (Miss Vail) ; at 500 feet in Northern Vermont (Brainerd); at 5,000 feet on Mt. Adams, N. H. (Deane). [Aleghanian ; Canadian.]| . DRYOPTERIS SPINULOSA, var. DILITATA (Hoffm.) Underw. Ranges from 500 feet in Northern New Jersey, northward to 6660 feet on Clingman’s Dome, N. C. (Beardslee and Kofoid); occurs at 6,000 feet on Grandfather Mt., N.C. (Small and Heller); at _ 5678 feet on White Top Mt., Va. (Miss Leeming); at 2,300 feet on the Pocono Mt., Pa. (Porter); at 2,600 feet at Ava- lanche Pass, N. Y., (Britton) ; at 4,500 feet on the mountains of New England (Deane, Faxon, Brainerd, Pringle). [-A/e- ghanian; ; Canadian.]| _DRYOPTERIS SPINULOSA, Var. INTERMEDIA (Muhl.) Underw. Ranges from near sea level from New Jersey northward to 5,000 feet on White Top Mt., Va.(Mrs. Britton); occurs at 2,000 feet on the Pocono Mt., Pa. (Porter); at 2,000 feet at Onteora, N.Y. (Miss Vail); at 5,000 feet on the mountains of New England © (Faxon, Brainerd, Pringle, Deane). [ Alleghanian ; Canadian. | Dryorreris THELYPTERIS (L.) A. Gray. Ranges from sea level _ along the Atlantic coast to 2,000 feet in Northern Vermont (Brainerd); occurs at 300 feet in Baltimore county, Md. (J. D. 464 Smith); at 700 feet at Shelburne, N. H. (Deane). . [ Louzsi- antan ; Carolinian ; Alleghamian. | POLYSTICHUM ACROSTICHOIDES (Michx.) Schott. Ranges from near sea level along the Atlantic coast to 2,700 feet in Garrett county, Md. (J. D. Smith); occurs at 2,000 feet in Rabun county, Ga. (Small); at 2,400 feet near Marion, Va. (Judge Brown); at 2,000 feet at Onteora, N. Y. (Miss Vail) ; at 2,000 feet in Northern Vermont (Pringle, Deane). [Louésianian ; Carolinian ; Alleghanian. | POLYSTICHUM ACROSTICHOIDES, var. SCHWEINITZII (Beck.). Near sea level in New Jersey; ascends to 1,500 feet in Habersham county, Ga. (Small); to 2,000 feet on the Pocono Mt., Pa. (Mrs. Britton); to 2.500 feet at Onteora, N. Y. (Miss Vail). | Adleghanian.]| PotysticHuM Braun (Spenner). (Aspidium Braunit, Spenner.) Ranges from 2,000 feet on North Mountain, Sullivan county, Pa., to 5,000 feet at Randolph, Vt. (Churchill); descends to 1,000 feet at Ferrisburg and Williamstown, Vt. (Faxon, Pringle). [ Adleghanian ; Canadian.) : CYSTOPTERIS BULBIFERA (L.) Bernh. Ranges from near sea level northward to 3,500 feet at Mountain Lake, Va. (Britton) ; oc- _ curs at 1,000 feet in Winston county, Ala. (Mohr); at 1,300 feet on Willoughby Mt., Vt. (Deane). [Carolinian; Alleghan- ian. | oes CYSTOPTERIS FRAGILIS (L.) Bernh. Ranges from near sea level along the Atlantic and Gulf coasts to 5,000 feet on Mt. Wash- ington, N. H. (Faxon); occurs at 1,000 feet in Winston county, Ala. (Mohr); at 3,000 feet on Pond Mt., Va. ‘Miss Cathcart) ; at 2,700 feet in Garrett county, Md. (J. D. Smith); at 2,700 feet at Avalanche Pass, N. Y. (Britton); at 3,000 feet in Northern Vermont (Pringle, Faxon). [Loudsianian; Carolin- tan ; Alleghanian ; Canadian. | | CYSTOPTERIS FRAGILIS, var. DENTATA, Hook. Ranges from 300 — feet in Lancaster county, Pa. (Porter), to 5,500 feet on Roan Mt., N.C. (J. D. Smith). [Aleghanian ; Canadian ?) a _ ONocLEA sensisitis L. Ranges from sea level along the Atlantic _ and Gulf coasts to 3,200 feet in Preston county, W. Va. (J. D. 465 Smith); occurs at 2,100 feet in Smith county, Va. (Mrs. Liver- more); at 2,000 feet at Onteora, N. Y. (Miss Vail); at 1,200 feet at Jaffrey, N. H. (Deane); at 1,000 feet in Northern Ver- miont (Brainerd, Pringle.) [Louéstanian; Carolinian; Allegha- nian. | OnocLeA StrRuTHIOPTERIS (L.) Hoffm. Ranges from near sea level along the northern Atlantic coast, (New Jersey and north- ward}, to 2,000 feet at Willoughby, Vt. (Rusby); ascends to 1,200 feet in Bald Eagle Valley, Pa. (Porter). [Ad/eghanian.] Woodsta alpina (Bolton.)S. F. Gray (Woopsta uyposorEa R. Br.). At 2,000-4,200 feet on Mt. Mansfield, Vt. (Faxon, Pringle); _ descends to 2,000 feet on Mt. Willoughby, Vt. (Faxon, Pringle): [ Canadian. | WoobsIA GLABELLA R. Br. At 4,000 feet on Mt. Mansfield, Vt. (Faxon); descends to 1,500 feet on the same mountain (Pringle) ; _ to 1,000-2,500 feet at Willoughby, Vt.(Faxon); to 900 feet at Gorham, N. H. (Deane). [Canadian; Alleghantan ?.] WoopsiA Itvensis (L.) R. Br. Ranges from near sea level from Northern New Jersey northward to 5,000 feet on Mt. Lincoln, N. H. (Faxon); occurs at 5,000 feet at Randolph, N. H. (Churchill); at 3,000 feet on Mt. Mansfleld, N. H. (Faxon); at 2,000 feet at Crawford Notch, N. H. (Faxon); at 900 feet at Gorham, N. H. (Deane); at 1,800 feet at Plattekill Clove, N. Y. (Miss Vail) ; at 700 feet in Lycoming county, Pa. (Small & Heller); at 250 feet in Bucks county, Pa.(Porter). [Ade- ghanian ; Canadian. | Woopsia optusa (Spreng.) Torr. Ranges from near sea level in Northern New Jersey and northward to 2,200 feet at Broad Ford, Va, (Mrs. Britton); occurs at 1,000 feet in Winston county, Ala. (Mohr); at 1,500 feet in Alleghany county, Md.(J. D. Smith) ; at 1,000 feet in Northern Vermont (Brainerd). [Ad/eghanian.]| DicksoNIA PUNCTILOBULA (Michx.) A. Gray. Ranges from near sea level along the Atlantic coast from New Jersey northward to 5,678 feet on White Top Mt., Va. (Small); occurs at 1,200 feet in Winston county, Ala. (Mohr); at 4,500 feet on Blowing Rock Mt., N. C. (Small & Heller); at 2,700 feet in Garrett 466 county, Md. (J. D. Smith); at 2,000 feet on the Pocono Mt., Pa. (Porter); at 2,000 feet at Onteora, N. Y. (Miss Vail); at 2,000 feet in Northern Vermont (Brainerd). [Caroliman ; Alle- ghanian ; Canadian.) TRICHOMANES Perers! A. Gray. At 1,000 feet along Black Creek, Etowah county, Ala. (Mohr), and from 1,000-1,200 feet along the Sipsey River, Ala. (Peters). [Carolinian.] TRICHOMANES RADICANS Swartz. At 600 feet in Marion county, Ala. (Mohr); at 1,000 feet in Hale county, Ala. (E. A. Smith); at 1,000 feet in Winston county, Ala. (Mohr). [Lowzszanian ; Carolinian. ? | LyGoDIUM PALMATUM (Bernh.) Swartz. Ranges from near sea level in Massachusetts and New Jersey to 2,100 on the Pocono Plateau, Pa. (Porter). [Adleghanian.] OsMUNDA CINNAMOMEA L. Ranges from sea level along the At- lantic coast to 5,678 feet on White Top Mt., Va. (Mrs. Britton); occurs at 3,000 feet in Rabun county, Ga. (Small); at 2,700 feet in Garrett county, Md. (J. D. Smith); at 2,000 feet on the Pocono Mt., Pa. (Porter); at 2,000 feet in Greene county, N. Y. (Miss Vail); from 90-1,000 feet in Northern Vermont (Pringle, Brainerd). [Loudstanian; Carolinian,; Alleghanian ; Canadian. | OsMUNDA CINNAMOMEA, forma FRONDOSA (A. Gray). Britton. Ranges from sea level in New Jersey and New York to 3,000 | feet on Pine Mt., Grayson county, Va. (Small). [Carolinian; Alleghanian| OsmunpA Crayrontana L. Ranges from sea level along the Northern Atlantic coast (New Jersey to Maine) to 5,000 feet on White Top Mt., Va. (Mrs. Britton); occurs at 2,700 feet in Garrett county, Md. (J. D. Smith); at 2,000 feet on the Pocono Mt., Pa. (Porter); at 2,200 feet near Onteora, N. Y. (Miss Vail); from g0~-1,000 feet in Northern Vermont (Brainerd, Pringle), and from 700-1,000 feet in Coos county, N. H. (Deane). [Alleghanian.]} _ Osmunpa reGALIs L. Ranges from sea level along the Atlantic — ___- €0ast to 3,000 feet on Brushy Mt., Va. (Small); occurs at 2,700 467 feet in Garrett county, Md. (J. D. Smith); at 2,000 feet on the Pocono Mt., Pa. (Porter); at 2,000 feet at Onteora, N. Y. (Miss Vail); from 90-1,000 feet in Northern Vermont (Pringle, Brainerd); at 1,000 feet in Coos county, N. H. (Deane). [Loutstanian ; Carolinan, Alleghanian.| Notes upon various Species of Iridaceze and other Orders. By Tuomas MORONG. IRIDACEE. Two species of /ris must be added to the list of those within the range of A. Gray’s Manual, Ed. 6, and one other if Canada be included. Iris Germanica, L., the great violet-colored flag of Middle Europe, was found by Mr. A. A. Heller during the last year ap- parently. well established near Mt. Crawford, Western Virginia. Probably a garden escape. Iris Missouriensis, Nutt. (J. Tolmieana, Herb.) occurs in Mis- souri and Nebraska, and more commonly towards the southwest. Iris Hookeri, Penny, Steud. Nom. Bot. Pt. 1, 822 (1840). This has been established as a good species by Mr. Watson (Coult. Bot. Gaz. xii. 100). It occurs in Newfoundland and along the lower St. Lawrence (Pringle). /. Canadensis, which one might at first thought imagine it to be, has not yet been identified. This, as nearly as we can judge, is merely a form of J. versicolor, L.., but may prove distinct when we come to understand the Cinadian species more thoroughly. Tris tridentata, Pursh, not hitherto detected in our territory, is most commonly called /. ¢ripetala, Walter, but Walter's name is antedated by J. ¢ripetala, L. f. Supp. 97 (1781), a different species, now transferred to Morea, but remaining a synonym nevertheless. SISYRINCHIUM. The species of the Atlantic States should be eciad S&S. Be mudianum, L., in spite of the fact that it is not known to occur in Bermuda, as this was undoubtedly the original name given to it 468 -by Linnzus. In Sp. Pl. 954, he mentions two forms: “a S. Ber- — mudiana,’ which he says grows in Virginia, and «8 S. Bermudien- sts,’ which is attributed to the Bermudas. The first is founded upon Plukenet’s t. 61, f. 1, and Dillenius’ t. 41, f. 49, both of which are evidently our plant, and the habitat cited is Virginia. It differs very essentially from S. Bermudiense, the Bermudan plant. Linnzeus apparently had not seen this latter plant, as no specimen of it is preserved in his Herbarium (deste Hemsley, Brit. Journ. Bot. xxii. 109). As to the question whether there are two or more species in the Atlantic States, I am very well satisfied after a careful study of all the forms that so far we cannot be sure of more than one. The distinctions made between S. angustifolium, Mill. and S. anceps, .Cav.do not seem to hold. Both have from one to several pedun- cles, and both have seeds nearly smooth, faintly and deeply pitted. Abundant specimens of both, contained in the Herbarium of Co- lumbia College, as well as specimens collected fresh in the vicin- ity of the city of New York, show this to be the fact. S. mucronatum, Mx, is merely a narrow-winged form of S. Bermudianum. It seems to me that Dr. Asa Gray, in the first edition of his Manual, named the plant correctly, regarding anceps and mucronatum merely as forms of S. Bermudianum. The synonymy will stand as follows: S. Bermudianum, L. Sp. Pl. 954 (175 3). S. angustifolium, Mill. Dict. (1768). S. anceps, Cav. Diss. 6, 345, t. 190, f. 2 (1788). S. gramineum, Curtis, Bot. Mag. t. 464 (1799)- S. mucronatum, Mx. FI. ii. 33 (1803). ORCHIDACEZ. In an article contained in the BULLETIN OF THE TORREY Bo- TANICAL CLUB, xx. 31, the writer maintained the essential identity of Habenaria ciliaris (L.) R. Br. and Hadenaria blephariglottis (Willd.) Torr. On the 23d of last July I had a good opportunity to compare — the two, then in flower, growing side by side on Staten Island, New York.. A critical study of the plants in fresh blossom has -led me to modify my opinion to some ‘extent. The thing which . | + 469 had puzzled me the most in my first examination was an inter- ‘mediate form bearing yellow flowers, with both naked and fringed or cut-toothed petals, H, blephariglotts being described in the books as having only white petals with naked margins. Of this intermediate form I found several examples mixed among the two species. This I now believe is a hybrid, and fully accounts for the apparent running together of the two. The real ci/aris and blephariglottis are perhaps sufficiently distinct to be regarded as separate species. The latter has somewhat smaller, pure white petals, a narrower, oblong tip, and flowers three or four days earlier than cé#aris In ciliaris the lip broadens in the middle and the corolla is of a deep yellow or orange tint. So far as size and habit, the margins of the petals and the fringe of the lip are con- cerned, scarcely any distinction between the two seems to exist, and they must be regarded as very closely related. The fact that they hybridize, if nothing else, would show this to be the case. In that article I also noticed a monstrous form of H. ciliaris, obtained by Mr. Henry Ogden in the vicinity of New York. I have now to mention still another irregularity of this species. Mrs: J.C: Wright, of Fairfield, Conn., sends us a proliferous form which has four additional racemes of flowers growing from the summit of the regular raceme. The plant is normal in other respects. COMMELINACE/E. Commelina communis, 1.., not noted in Gray’s Manual. Occurs extensively in and around the city of New York, and along the Susquehanna River in Pennsylvania, from its mouth to the hills above Harrisburg. It may readily be distinguished from C. Vir- ginica, L., by its spathe, which is split to the base, and by its glabrous, or nearly glabrous, stem and leaves, and from C. nudt- jfiora, L., by its open spathe, generally much broader leaves and more robust habit, as well as by the much larger seeds of the ventral cell, which are rugose and deeply pitted instead of being merely reticulated as in C. nudiflora. This species is usually regarded as introduced, but as the writer found it this summer on the Susque- hanna, it has every appearance of being native. In this connec- tion, it is worthy of note that Linnzus gives its habitat as ss “America.” 470 TRADESCANTIA. Four well marked species of this genus are found within our bounds: Tradescantia rosea, Vent., occurring from Maryland to Florida and west to Missouri and Texas. : Tradescantia net, L., not 7: Virginica, as usually written. Tradescantia pilosa, Lehm., Nov. Act. Ac. Caes. Leop. xiv. Pt. 2, 822, t. 48 (1828). This is a good species, entirely distinct from 7. Virginiana. It has stout stems which are more or less pubescent or pilose, often flexuous (7: flexuosa, Raf.), and is especially distinguished by its numerous umbels (1-7), commonly dense and many-flowered, terminal and axillary or on axillary branches. Pedicels and sepals usually glandular hairy. Mr. Eggert, of St. Louis, Mo., in sending specimens from his neighborhood, writes that it has larger leaves and more numerous flowers and blossoms much later than 7; Virginiana (July). Tradescantia brevicaulis Raf. Atl. Jour. 150 (1832). Probably — the plant named “7: Virginica, var. villosu, Watson,” in Gray’s Manual, Ed. 6. This should not be confounded with 7 Virgint- ana, as it is clearly distinct. A dwarf plant, one to six inches high, or oftentimes acaulescent. The stem, leaves, pedicels and — calyx are pilose with long spreading hairs which are seldom if ever glandular. The leaves are narrow and sometimes 12 inches in length; the bracts wider and often larger. Umbels 4 to 12- flowered, with rays I to 2 inches long. Corolla rather small, blue or rose-purple. Mr. Eggert collected this form in Missouri, and writes that it grows on rocky hillsides, and blossoms very early, scarcely any flowers to be seen by the end of May. Rafinesque reports it from Illinois and Kentucky. | SCITAMINE. Thalia dealbata, Roscoe, recently received from Mr. Een é Z grows in the swamps of Missouri. AMARYLLIDACE/ or Hymenocallis occidentalis (Leconte) Kunth. Specimens of this, 471 obtained the last summer in Missouri by Mr. Eggert, raise the question anew whether we have more than one species in the At- lantic States. Mr. Watson, in Proc. Am. Ac. xiv. 301, describes two species, 7. Palmeri, S. Wats. and H. humilis, S. Wats. as oc- curring in Florida. Leconte notes four other species growing in the States just north of Florida, of which he writes full and elab- orate descriptions, accompanied by excellent drawings of three of them. These species he names Pancratium Mexicanum, P. rota- tum, P. coronarium and P. occidentale. The last species he assigns to Georgia, Tennessee and Kentucky, and this without much doubt is the same as the Illinois and Missouri plant. As Leconte was a very accurate observer and better acquainted with the habits and forms of these plants than any writer since his time, I have no doubt that he is correct in his conclusions, whether his names are to be adopted or not. Whether any of his species is the old P. Carolinianum of Linnzus or not has long been a mooted ques- tion. The species of Linnzus is founded upon Catesby’s figure (Nat. Hist. Car. i. App. 5), deseribed by Catesby as « Lilio- Narcissus Polianthos,” and seen by him in a “ bog near Palluchu- cula, an Indian town on the Savannah river, Georgia." Nothing just like this figure has been found since. The border of the staminal cup is represented with 2 and 3 - large triangular teeth between each pair of stamens, and the flower cluster with 2 spathe-like bracts at the base. Some botanists are disposed to regard this as a rude drawing of H. rotata or H. ocet- dentalis, while others (e. g. Baker in Amaryll. 113) consider it P. maritimum, a common European species. Neither Walter nor Elliott profess to have seen it, nor is it contained in any American or European Herbarium. For the present, therefore, we are com- pelled to regard it as a myth. Hf. occidentalis seems quite clearly distinct from H. dacera, Salisb. (#7. rotata, Herb.) which Mr. Watson in the work cited above regards as probably the original of the Linnzan plant. HASMODORACE., Of this order as now arranged by Engler and Prantl, we have only a single genus in this country, namely, GyrorueEca, Salisb, ‘Trans. Lin. Soc. i. 327 (1815). 472 Heritiera, Gmel. (1791) which Kuntze substitutes for Elliott's Lachnanthes had been used two years previously by Dryander (Ait. Hort. Kew. iii. 456) for a genus of the Sterculiacee. The older names for Dryander’s genus cited by Kuntze, such as Amygdalus, Burm. and Atunus, Rumpf. are pre-Linnzan. The next in priority appears to be Gyrotheca. A single species only is known: Gyrotheca capitata (Walt.). It is a little singular that Walter’s specific name has been changed into “ tinctoria”’ by all the writers who have quoted him, from Pursh to Kuntze. The plant is placed by Walter among his “Anonymo” genera, the term he uses when he is doubtful about the genus, but his description is so full that no one can doubt what is meant. The synonymy will stand as follows: Gyrotheca capitata (Walt.). Anonymo capitata, Walt. Fl. Car. 68 (1788). Dilatris Caroliniana, Lam. Ill. i. 127 (1791). Fleritiera Gmelini, Michx. FI. i. 21 (1803). _ Ddiatris tinctoria, Pursh, Fl. 30 (1814). Gyrotheca tinctoria Salisb. Trans. Hort. Soc. i. 327 (1812). Lachnanthes tinctoria FM. Sk. i. 47 (1817). Heritiera tinctoria (Gmel.) Kuntze, Rev. Gen. 699 (1891). \ NAIADACEE. Potamogeton Spirillus, Tuckerm. In Britten's Journal of Bot- any for October, 1893, Mr. A. Bennett, commenting upon my adoption of Tuckerman’s name for this species, advances the re opinion that it should be called P. dimorphum, Raf., on the ground that Rafinesque in his review of Barton’s Flora of 1815 in the Monthly Magazine and Critical Review of 1817 proposes this name in the place of P. diversifolius used by Barton for what he con- siders a new species, since that name had already been applied by Rafinesque himself to Michaux’s Ayéridus. 1 should agree to this _ | if we could be sure that Barton meant by his description in 1815, supplemented by his drawing and description in 1823, the plant which we now know as Spzrillus. I must differ from Mr. Bennett, _ however, in thinking that P. Spirillus was meant. The figure of _ Barton represents a plant, as Barton himself puts it, with “« sub- 473 mersed leaves very delicately filiform,” some of those in the plate being over two inches in length. These are exactly the leaves of P. diversifolius, Raf. (P. hybridus, Michx.), and unlike those of _ Spirillus which are much shorter and broader. The only spikes of fruit shown are emersed ones which are figured as sessile. Now neither diverstfolius nor Spirillus ever has emersed sessile spikes, but they are on peduncles from two to nine lines in length, and usually several times longer than the submersed ones. No Potam- ogeton answering to this figure in all respects has, so far as I know, been detected since Barton’s day either in New Jersey, his locality, or anywhere else in the United States. New Jersey has .been pretty thoroughly searched from one end to the other, and we should have been very likely to have seen this erratic form were it there. I am compelled to believe that in spite of his as- sertion to the contrary, Barton really had some form of Michaux’s hybridus in hand. In the course of his article Mr. Bennett makes a fling which is unworthy of him, and which I have most certainly done nothing to provoke. He says (p. 295): “but the ‘law’ that is desired to be forced on us, ‘that any species or variety that has been so named under any other species or variety cannot be used in the same genus,’ will be of somewhat difficult application. Students certainly will never know, and even monographers will not be safe, as proved by Dr. Morong’s own work, where he must (by his own law) change the names of at least three of his species, having failed to ascertain that they were in use before.” Mr. Bennett seems to hold me responsible for this “ law,” whereas it is a rule of nomenclature adopted by our National Association of botanists at their meeting at Madison last August, a meeting at which I was not present, and did not influence in the least. I certainly do approve of it as a good rule, under what is termed the law of priority, a law which Mr. Bennett himself must acknowledgé as sound, or his anxious search after the earliest names is useless. I think it would be difficult for Mr. Bennett to show that American botanists have ever manifested a desire to force this or any of their rules in nomenclature upon anybody either in this country or abroad. Certainly we shall lose no sleep if our British cousins choose to follow a different set of rules. 474 Notes on the Flora of Southeastern Kentucky, with a List of Plants collected in Harlan and Bell Counties in 1893, By T. H. KEARNEY, JR. Last summer while debating the weighty question of the se- lection of a field for botanical exploration, it occurred to me that the mountain counties of Southeastern Kentucky presented a de- sirable region. Here was a country almost overlooked by the collector. Since Rafinesque made his journey to the “ Wasioto or Cumberland Mountains,” little work had been done in that part of the State. Moreover, the position of that country on the south- ern edge of the northern flora, as usually defined, seemed to promise the finding of southern plants new to the northern range. Unfortunately I was unable to get into the field before the first of August. Leaving Knoxville on that date, I went to Pen- nington’s Gap, Va., ona branch of the L. & N.R.R. Here I secured the services of a negro,a team of mules and a wagon, and by means of this combination reached Harlan C. H., Ky., after a ride of twenty-five miles over the roughest road imaginable. Leaving Pennington’s, we followed the North Fork of Powell’s River through the gap in the main range of the Cumberland Moun- tains. Then the road crossed Little Black Mountain, a parallel ridge, and descended gradually into the valley where the three “forks”’ unite to form the Cumberland River. Harlan “Town” proved to be a fair type of the Southern mountain village—dirty, exceedingly ugly and thoroughly lawless. A stay of a few days here convinced me that I must get further into the mountains to secure good results, though at least one plant of interest, Viola villosa, Walt., was found here. Itisa well — : marked species, and no one who has seen it growing would con- | sider it otherwise. The roundish, cordate or reniform leaves lie flat on the ground. The appressed pubescence of the upper surface gives ita silvery appearance. The under surface is pur- plish on the veins, or sometimes the whole surface hasa purple hue. In the same vicinity, Clethra acuminata, Michx., Ovals _ -vecurva, Ell., Magnolia iripetala, L.. and oe tenuifolia, Nutt. ce : oy were LM ag 475 From Harlan I went up the Poor Fork of the Cumberland, by the same primitive conveyance, to Poor Fork Postoffice, about twenty-one miles above Harlan. Here, at the house of the worthy and hospitable postmaster, I stayed for nearly a month. The Poor Fork flows through a narrow valley between two ranges of the Cumberland system, the Big Black and the Pine ' Mountain. The Big Black Mountain is over 3,000 feet high at points; the Pine is much lower. In geological formation, the district is almost entirely sandstone and shale. On the Pine there is an occasional outcropping of limestone. In the immediate vicinity of Poor Fork I collected Campanula divaricata, Michx., Hydrastis Canadensis, L., Panicum capillare campestre, Gattinger, and Panicum ramulosum, Michx. (growing on moist shale on the river bank). A form of Acalypha Virginica L. with every part, even the bracts, much reduced in size, was abundant in a low, sandy field. On the Big Black Mountain, Azalea lutea, L.; Gahum Jlati- folium, Michx.; Carex aestivalis, M. A. Curtis; Zrautvetteria Caro- linensis (Walt.) A. M. Vail; Astzilbe, diternata (Vent.) Britt. (A. de- andra, Don.) and Holcus lanatus, L., appeared. On a spur of the Big Black known as Benham’s Spur, Panax guinquefolia, ..; Thalictrum coriaceum (Britt.) Small*; Aruncus Aruncus (L.) Karst.; Magnolia Fraseri, Walt.; Hystrix Hystrizx (L.) MacMillan, and Corycarpus diandrus (Michx.) Kuntze were found. The Pine Mountain presented a more varied and interesting flora. Magnolia macrophylla, Michx., very conspicuous because of the whitened under surface of its huge leaves, with large ovoid or semi-globose cones of a dull flesh-color, Solidago erecta, Pursh, Aster leiophyllus lanceolatus, Porter, Meibonnia laevigata (Nutt.) Kuntze, Clintonia umbellata (Michx.) Torr., Disporum lanuginosum (Michx.) Britt. and Pogonia trianthophora (Sw.) B. S. P. were collected on its slopes. A ledge of exposed, dry sandstone at the summit yielded Cap- noides sempervirens (L.) Borkh., Lechea racemulosa,.Michx., rather depauperate specimens of Guaphalium Hellen, Britt., Eupatorium * Mem, Torr. Club, iv. 96. 476 pudescens, Muhl., Agrostis intermedia, Scribn.,* Panicum commuta- tum latifolium Scribn. n. var.t and a Lysimachia, nearest to L. radicans, but differing in its erect habit and broader and shorter leaves, less pointed at either end. On the shaded north side of this ledge Heuchera Rugeli, Shuttlew., Peramium pubescens (Willd.) C. C. Curtiss, Leptorchis lilu- folia (L.) Kuntze, and Asplenium montanum, Willd., were found. After several weeks spent in the neighborhood of Poor Fork, I resolved to try the valley of the Cumberland at some point further down. Leaving my quarters in Harlan county, I had a two days’ ride over an abominable road to Wasioto, a small lum- ber town fifty-five miles below Poor Fork Postoffice, and about one mile above Pineville, the county-seat of Bell county. Along the road I saw great quantities of Panicum flexile (Gat- tinger) Scribn.,t a species resembling P. capillare, but very distinct. About nine miles above Wasioto the Cumberland enters a gorge locally known as the “ Narr’s”” (Narrows), through which it flows for several miles. Here, on the bluffs, many interesting plants were collected. Among them I would mention udus odoratus, L., Stuartia pentagyna, ’ Hér., Scutellaria saxatilis, Rid- dell, Aster prenanthoides, Muhl., and a Houstonia which I refer, doubtfully, to Pursh’s H. zenella.§ * «Spikelets not crowded, pedicels capillary, usually much longer than the spike lets; flowering glume about 3/ line long, sometimes with a short and delicate dorsal awn. “Culms erect or geniculate below, 2-3 ft. high; leaves spreading, 2-6 lines wide, the uppermost 4-8 in. long; panicle 7-14 in. long, pyramidal, the rather firm branches at first erect, those uppermost often spreading while the base of the panicle is yet included in the loose, upper leaf-sheath. Spikelets less crowded and smaller — ie than in A. eda¢a, with the flowering glume broader at the more rounded apex. Intermediate between A. e/ata and A. perennans.” + “ Leaves very broad, panicle large, the widely spreading branches few-flowered.” _ $ Panicum capillare flexile, Gattinger, Cat. Tenn. FI., 94 (1887). § Houstonia tenella, Pursh, Fl. Am. Sept. 106? Aspect and habit of H. serpy//ifolia, Perennial by extensively creeping, filiform rootstocks. Stems slender, smooth, much branched. Leaf 5-7 mm. long, oblong- spatulate, obtuse or slightly pointed at apex, tapering into a slender petiole from se : one-fourth to twice as long, conspicuously veined; the upper surface, with the margin _ and petiole, furnished with scattered, strigose, white hairs; flowers few on very long peduncles, deep blue, about one-half as large as those of H. serpyllifolia; tube of — corolla very slender, about twice as long as the lobes and 3104 times as dese: as the d lobes of the Bio Laser, oly, veigee fruit not seen, ; 477 For the entire fifty miles between Poor Fork and Wasioto, the Pine Mountain remains the same in height and character. It is only broken at Wasioto, where the Cumberland passes through it. The Black Mountain, however, breaks up into a number of lesser ridges, of which the chief is known as the Log Mountain. The Pine still proved the most interesting collecting ground. In a ravine on the south slope, a single specimen of the rare and little-known Gaylussacia ursina (M, A. Curtis) Torr. & Gray, a much branched shrub about I m. in height, was found. The best it could yield in the way of inflorescence or fruit was a few clusters of apparently unfertilized ovaries. Lodelia puberula, Michx., Galax aphylla, L., and the magnificent grass, Erianthus contortus, Ell., also appeared in the ravine. On the dryer ridges of the Pine, Eupatorium verbenefolium, Michx., Chrysopsis graminifolia, Nutt., Juncus biflorus, Ell., and an interesting little Panicum with membranaceous leaf-margins, Pant- cum nitidum crassifolium, A. Gray, possibly Elliott's P. ciatum, flourished. In the richer soil of the north slope grew Artstolochia Sipho, LHér., Pyrularia pubera, Michx., Cimicifuga Americana, Michx. and Eupatorium sessilifolium L. In the neighborhood of Wasioto, a well-marked variety of Panicum capillare, Panicum capillare geniulatum Scribn.,* was found to be frequent in the loose soil of railroad embankments. On Clear Creek, Oxypolis rigida (L.), Raf.,t Solidago arguta, Ait., S. patula, Muhl. and S. Curtisu, Torr. & Gray, were collected. On dry slate along the same stream Phyllanthus Carolinensis, Walt., and Aster dumosus, L., were found. Towards the end of September I left Kentucky, regretting much that circumstances had not permitted me to begin collecting earlier in the season in a country whose flora would seem to promise so much of interest. _ Appended is a complete list of the plants collected in Bell and -*« Culms usually prostrate or ascending, geniculate or much branched, with numerous oblong or ovate diffusely branched panicles. Spikelets more numerous than in var. a [the ordinary form]. This corresponds to var. geniculatum of P. proliferum.” + Tiedemannia rigida, Coult. and Rose. 478 Harlan counties. For the names of the grasses I am indebted to Prof. F. Lamson-Scribner. 176. Asplenium montanum, Willd. 323. Asplentum Trichomanes, L. 48, 210, 395. Camptosorus rhizophyllus (L.) Link. \ 47. Cystopteris fragilis (L.) Bernh. 142. Dicksonia punctilobula (Michx.) A. Gray. 389, 573. Dryopteris intermedia (Muhl.) A. Gray. 61. Dryopteris marginalis (L.) A. Gray. 211. Dryopteris Noveboracensts (L.) A. Gray. 129. Polypodium vulgare, L. 566. Pteris aguilina, L. 130. 7suga Canadensis (L.) Carr. 2, 134, 436. Alisma Plantago, L. 187. Sagittaria latifolia, Willd, 23. Agrostis alba, L., var. 221, 283, 367, 382. Agrostis elata, Trin. (?) 39, 174. Agrostis intermedia, Scribn. 381. Agrostis perennans, Tuckerm. 384. Andropogon nutans, L. 364, 377. Andropogon provincialis, Lam. 379. Andropogon scoparius, Michx. 313, 368. Aristida gracilis, Ell. 314. Aristida purpurascens, Poir. 365. Arundinaria gigantea tecta (Walt.) Scribn. [Arundo tecta, Walt. ]. 36, 74, 279. Brachyelytrum erectum (Schreb.) Beauv. 276. Bromus ciliatus purgans (L.) A. Gray. 375. Cinna arundinacea, L, 235. Corycarpus diandrus (Michx.) Kuntze. 43. Danthonia spicata, Beauv. 140. Eleusine Indica (L.) Gaertn. 236. Elymus Canadensis, L. 5 196, 263, 370. Eragrostis capillaris, Nees. . 150. Eragrostis Frankii, Meyer. 55- Zragrostis hypnoides (Lam.) B.S. P. 28, 158. Eragrostis Purshii, Schrad. —- 385. Erianthus contortus, Ell. + 93. Holcus lanatus, L. 371. Homalocenchrus Virginicus (Willd,) Britton. 237. Hystrix Hystrix (L.) MacMillan. 383, 578. Muhlenbergia diffusa, Schreb. 366. Muhlenbergia Mexicana (L.) Trin. 33+ 234. Muhlenbergia tenuiflora (Willd.) B. S. x. _ 309, 380. Panicum agrostidiforme, Lam. os saiaaeeu culate Miche: 479 - 151. Panicum capillare campestre, Gattinger. 317, 335, 378, 497. Panicum capillare geniculatum, Scribn. 152, 229. Panicum clandestinum, L. 34, 54. Panicum commutatum, Schultes. 299. Panicum commutatum latifolium, Scribn, 316, 425, 567. Panicum filiforme, L. 312, 579. Panicum flexile (Gattinger) Scribn. 53. Panicum laxifiorum, Lam. 52. Panicum microcarpon, Muhl. 594. Panicum nitidum crassifolium, A, Gray. 58, 141. Panicum nitidum pubescens (Chapm.) Scribn. [ Panicum laxt- fiorum pubescens, Chapm ] 315, 374. Panicum proliferum, Lam. 35, 50, 57. Panicum ramulosum Michx. 20. Panicum sanguinale, L. 258, 298, 376. Panicum Walteri, Poir. 172, Lanicnm sp. 195, 253. Paspalum leve, Michx. 26, 56, 386. Paspalum longepedunculatum, Le Conte. 197. Paspalum setaceum, Michx. 373. Steglingia flava (L.) Kuntze. 278, 369. Sporobolus vagineflorus (Torr.) Vasey. 125. 155. Carex estivalis, M. A. Curtis. 119, Carex cephalophora, Muhl. 319. Carex crinita, Lam. 156. Carex rosea radiata, Dewey. 73, 115. Carex virescens, Muhl. 281. Carex sp. 595- Cyperus diandrus, Torr. 201. Cyperus flavescens, L. 222, 318. Cyperus retrofractus, Torr. 204, 411. Cyperus strigosus, L. 463. Dulichium spathaceum (L.) Pers. a‘ 27, 202. Eleocharis ovata (Roth) R. Br. 46. Kyllingia pumila, Michx. 24, 205. Rynchospora glomerata (L.) Vahl. 428. Scirpus cyperinus (L.) Kunth. | 149. Scirpus debilis, Pursh. 3. Scirpus polyphyllus, Vahl. 108. Scleria pauciflora, Muhl. 173, 466. Scleria triglomerata, Michx. 49, 97. Fimbristylis capillaris (L.) A, Gray. 448, 590. Commelina nudifiora, L. a Funcus acuminatus, Michx. 488. Funcus biforus, Ell. 22, 3D 203. Funcus marginatus, Rostk. . Eat Chamaelirium oy Snpeadoar Walt. 480 112, 295, 580. Clintonia umébellata (Michx.) Torr. 113, 178, 243. Disporum lanuginosum (Michx.) Britton. 132, §72. Medeola Virginiana, L. 190 Polygonatum biflorum commutatum anne Morong. [ fody- gonatum commutatum, Schultes. } 133, 348, 426. VAGNERA RACEMOosA (L.) Morong. [ Smilacina racemosa, Desf.] 485. Smilax glauca, Walt. 337. Smilax rotundifolia, L. 297. Achroanthes untfolia (Michx.) Raf. 487. Gyrostachys simplex (A. Gray) Kuntze. 429. Leptorchis Uilitfolia (L.) Kuntze. 249, 430, 493. Peramium pubescens ( Willd.) C. C. Curtiss. 105. Fogonia trianthophora (Sw.) B. S. P. 104. Pogonia verticillata (Willd.) Nutt. 7, 60. Alnus serrulata, Willd. 114, 165. Betula lenta, L. 72. Carpinus Virginica (Marsh.) Sudworth. 110. Castanea dentata (Marsh.) Sudworth. 181. Fagus atropunicea (Marsh.) Sudworth. 400. Quercus alba, L, 147. Quercus Prinus, L. 247. Quercus tinctoria, Bartr. 329, 443. Adicea pumila (L.) Raf. 336, 441. Boehmeria cylindrica (L.) Willd. 342, 533- Laportea Canadensis (L.) Gaud. 340, 584. Pyrularia pubera, Michx. 41, 84. Aristolochia Serpentaria, L. 286, 343, 516, 591. Aristolochia Sipho, L’Heér. 410. Polygonum hydropiperoides, Michx. — 284. Polygonum Pennsylvanicum, L. 552. Polygonum sagittatum, L. 481. Polygonum scandens, L. 447, 515. Polygonum Virginianum, L, 70. Mollugo verticillata, L. 10, 78, 245. Anychia Canadensis (L.) B.S. P. 198. Anychia dichotoma, Michx. 32. Sagina decumbens Smithii (A. Gray) S. Wats. 209. Magnolia Fraseri, Walt. 310. Magnolia macrophylla, Michx. 18. Magnolia tripetala, L. 5- Asimina triloba (L.) Dunal. 575) 593. Cimicifuga Americana, Michx. 153. Clematis Virginiana, L. 244. Hydrastis Canadensis, L. ' 250, 290. Thalictrum coriaceum (Britt) Small. 163. Trautvetteria Carolinensis (Walt.) A. M. Vail. rae 67. Caulophyllum thalictroides (L.) Michx, 481 6. Menispermum Canadense, L. 330, 444, 532. Lindera Benzoin (L,) Blume. 216. Sassafras Sassafras (1.) Karst. 123, 301. Capnotdes sempervirens (L.) Borkh, 19. Podostemon ceratophyllus, Michx. I, 128. Lenthorum sedoides, L. 117. Astilbe diternata (Vent.) Britton. 81. Heuchera Rugelii, Shuttlew. 44. Heuchera villosa, Michx. 154, 294, 555. Hydrangea arborescens, L. 87, Hamamelis Virginiana, L. 168, 184, 289, 307. Agrimonia striata, Michx. - 193. Aruncus Aruncus (L.) Karst. 71. Cerasus serotina (Ehrh.) Loisel. 305. Crategus coccinea, L, 65. Crategus Crus-Galli, L. 226, Potentilla Monspeliensis,L. [F. Norvegica, L.] 507. Pyrus arbutifolia (L.) L. f. 85. Rosa humilis, Marsh. 131, 326, 571. Rubus odoratus, L. 76. Baptisia tinctoria (L.) R. Br. 496. Cassia nictitans, L. 439. Cercts Canadensis, L. 100. Clitoria Mariana, L. 267. Cracca Virginiana, L. 328, 442, 558. Falcata comosa (L.) Kuntze. 127. Lespedeza hirta (L.) Ell. eee 456, 492. Lespedeza intermedia (S. Wats.) Britton. 355, 541. Lespedeza Nuttallit, Darl. 126, 392, 494. Lespedeza procumbens, Michx. 235. Lespedeza repens (L.) Bart. 354, 489, 542. Lespedeza Virginica (L.) Britton. 465, 529, 538. MEIBOMIA ANGUSTIFOLIA (Torr. & Gray.) [Desmodium panicu- latum angustifolium, Torr. & Gray.] 83, 242. Meibomia grandiflora (Walt.) Kuntze, 261, 406, 458, 576. Meibomia levigata (Nutt.) Kuntze, 260, 402, 491. Meibomia Marylandica (L.) Kuntze. 80. Meibomia nudifiora (L.) Kuntze. © 457. Meibomia viridifora (L.) Kuntze. 11, 280, 470. Oxalis recurva, Ell. 51, 464. Linum striatum, Walt. 99, 303) 352 508. Linum Virginianum, L. 164, 265. Polygala Curtissii, A. Gray. 139, 177, 421. Acalypha gracilens, A. Gray. Dok: 327» 445- Acalypha Virginica, L. a Age, Euphorbia corollata, L. 199, Euphorbia maculata, L. 482 523. Phyllanthus Carolinensis, Walt. 143. “hus copallina, L. 509. flex opaca, Ait. 239. Luonymus htt dc L. . 240. Acer, sp. 223. /mpatiens aurea, Muhl, 8. Jmpatiens biflora, Walt. 409. Rhamnus Carolinianus, Walt. 274, 333) 592. Ampelopsis guinguefolia (L.) Michx. 562. Vitis estivalis, Michx. 322, 548. Stuartia pentagyna, L’Her. 136. Ascyrum hypericoides, L. 397. Hypericum Drummondii (Grev. & Hook.) Torr. & Gray. 256. Hypericum gentianoides (L.) B.S. P. z ‘ 9, 433. Hypericum maculatum, Walt. 12, 16. Hypericum mutilum, L. 75. Hypericum prolificum, L 220. Helianthemum majus (L.) B.S. P. 495, 565. Lechea minor, L. [L. thymifolia, Michx.] 122, 230, 320. Lechea racemulosa, Michx. 246, 345. Solea concolor (Forst.) Ging. 13, 102. Viola villosa, Walt. 271. Cuphea petiolata (L.) Koehne. 66. Rotala ramosior (L.) Koehne. 212. Circea Lutetiana, L. 94, 519. Lpilobium coloratum, Muhl. 15. Fussiea decurrens (Walt.), D. C. 59. Ludwigia alternifolia, L. 31. Ludwigia palustris (L.) Ell. 116, 148. Aralia racemosa, L. 349, 414, 482. Aralia spinosa, L. 207. Panax guinguefolia, L. 186. Cicuta maculata, L. : 499. Oxypolis rigida (L.) Raf. 287. Sanicula Canadensis, L. 95» 241, 423, 547. Thaspium atropurpureum (Desr.) Nutt. 118, 293, 596. Thaspium barbinode (Michx.) Nutt. 302, 490. Cornus florida, L. 17, 546. Clethra acuminata, Michx. ' 89. Azalea lutea, L. 206. Azalea nudiflora, L. 107. Gaultieria procumbens, L. 182. Kalmia latifolia, L. 144. Oxydendrum arboreum (L.) D.C. 311. Rhododendron maximum, L. 417. Andromeda ligustrina (L.) Muhl. — Sane 2 Soe ve opiates ursina (M. A. — Torr. and. cece ~ 483 82. Vaccinum corymbosum, L. 86, 291. Vaccinium stamineum, L. 106, 454, 467. Galax aphylla, L. 189, Lysimachia quadrifolia, L " 121, Steironema sp. 473. Diosyyros Virginiana, L. 98, 514. Asclepias obtustfolia, Michx. 472, 588. Cuscuta Gronovii, Willd. 530. Phlox maculata, L. 424. Prunella vulgaris, L. 455, 545. Collinsonia Canadensis, L, 304, 401. Cuntla Mariana, L. 64. LHedeoma pulegioides (L.) Pers. 157. Jsanthus brachiatus (L.) B, S. P. 63. Koellia incana (Michx.) Kuntze. 228. Lycopus Virginicus, L. 92. Melissa officinalis, L. 162, 399. Monarda clinopodia, L. 469. Scutellaria laterifiora, L. 391. Scutellaria saxatilis, Riddell. 194. Stachys cordata, Riddell. 270. Trichostema dichotomum, L. 362, 476, 536, 557. Chelone glaéra, L. ‘ 145. Dasystoma pedicularia (L.) Benth. 91. DASYSTOMA L&VIGATA (Raf.) Britton. [Gerardia levigata, Raf.] ; 200. llysanthes gratioloides (L.) Benth. 183, 225. Mimulus ringens, L. 273, 501. Scrophularia Marylandica, L 334, 474. Epiphegus Virginiana (J) Bart. 508, 559. Cephalanthus occidentalis, L. 68. Diodia teres, Walt. 277. Galium circezans, Michx. 159. Galium latifolium, Michx. 233. Galium pilosum, Ait. 4,450. Galium tinctorium, L. 30, 213, 232, 537. Galium triflorum, Michx. ey 528. Houstonia purpurea, L. . 396. Houstonia tenella, Pursh.? 40, 77, 388. Houstonia tenutfolia, Nutt. 103. Mitchella repens, dee 88, 437. Viburnum acerifolium, L. 325. Viburnum Lentago, L. «AS 169, 227, 344. Campanula Americana, L. 124, 581. Campanula divaricata, Michx. 224, 468. Lobelia cardinalis, : 19 254. Lobelia — es ~ 353» 413, 484. 292, 431, 462. 446. 161, 390, 535, 570. 522, 551. 262, 412, 459. 356, 526, 549, 569. 90a, 35% 451. 435 525- 252, 268, 564. 90, 259. 475. 346, 403, 453. 296, 415. 405. 266, 427, 540. -553- 185. 394, 438. 191, 393, 432, 502. 218. 331, 520. 486. 1763 166, 214, 398. 416, 285, 479. 120, 404. 219. 359, 506, 561. 179. 96, 171, 180, 217. 192. IOI, 231. ——-:167, 255, 418. 360, 477, 503, 586. : 272, 339, 460, 556, 589. 440. 324. 518. 480. 4°7, 500, 511, 577. 343 484 Lobelia puberula, Michx. Lobelia sy philitica, L, Aster azureus, Lindl. Aster divaricatus, L. Aster dumosus, 1. Aster infirmus, Michx. Aster laterifiorus (L.) Britton. Aster leiophyllus lanesnicteis, Porter. Aster patens, Ait. Aster prenanthoides, Muhl. Aster surculosus, Michx. Aster undulatus, L. Bidens levis (L.) B.S. P. BRACHYCHA&TA SPHACELATA (Raf.) Britton. cordata (Short) Torr. & Gray. ] Cacalia atriplicifolia, L Chrysopsis graminifolia, Nutt. Chrysopsis Mariana (L.) Nutt. Coreopsis tripteris, L. Elephantopus Carolinianus, Willd. Elephantopus tomentosus, L. Erechthites hieracifolia (1.) Raf. Lrigeron Canadensis, L. Lupatorium ageratoides, L. f. Lupatorium album, L. Eupatorium pubescens, Muhl. Eupatorium purpureum, L. Lupatorium serotinum, Michx. Eupatorium sessilifolium, L. [ Brachycheta Eupatorium verbena folium, Michx. Uae ot CeUCKI/ATE, Willd.] _ Gnaphalium Helleri, Britt. Helenium autumnaile, L. Helianthus decapetalus, L. Helianthus parviflorus, Bernh. Heliopsis helianthoides (L.) B. S. P. Lfieracium Gronovit, L. fieracium paniculatum, L. Lactuca spicata (Lam.) A. S, Hitchcock. Pluchea fetida (L.) D. C. Prenanthes altissima, L. Prenanthes Serpentaria, Pursh. Rudbeckia laciniata, L. Rudbeckia spathulata, Michx. Sericocarpus asteroides (L.) B.S. P. Solidago arguta, Ait. _ Solidago arguta, Ait. (?) co ieoee L i 485 357» 504. Solidago Canadensis, L. 358, 505, 524, 544. Solidago Curtisii, Torr. and Gray. 170, 238, 422, 563. Solidago erecta, Pursh. 517. Solidago flexicaulis, L. 420. Solidago nemoralis, Ait. 109. Solidago odora, Ait. 498. Solidago patula, Muhl. 531. Solidago rugosa, Mill. : 269, 583. Verebesina alternifolia (L.) Britton. [ Actinomeris sguarrosa, Nutt.] 483. Verbesina occidentalis (L.) Walt. 188, Vernonia gigantea (Walt.) Britton. [Vernonia altissima, Nutt.] The Solandi Process of Sun Printing. * The above title might suggest that the following article should appear, if anywhere, in some journal upon physics, or at least not in one devoted strictly to botany. However, its purpose is only to treat a subject in its relation to the study of plant life, and there- fore is offered only as a contribution to botanical technique. The process consists, briefly, in exposing the subject, neces- sarily somewhat translucent, to the sunlight in a printing frame in common use by photographers, with a sheet of sensitized paper back of the subject, in the same manner as a print is taken from a negative of the ordinary sort. The paper which has thus far proved the most successful has been the “ American Aristotype,” for the — manner of using which full directions accompany the same, and will not be entered into here. The sun print thus obtained after it has been toned becomes __ the negative from which the positive picture is printed. To do this quickly and to the best advantage, the negative print is placed back downward in a dish containing a thin layer of common kerosene, care being taken to wipe it free from all surface oil after being removed. This negative saturated with the kerosene is placed face inward upon a clean plate of glass in the printing o *The substance of this paper, with many illustrative prints, was presented before a ee 1893. 486 frame and upon it a fresh sheet of the «‘ Aristo”’ paper is laid and clamped in place. The printing of the positive in the full\sun- light is the work of only a half minute or so, but better results ‘ are often obtained by a slower printing in diffused light; in fact the same rules hold good for this form of printing as for that of ordinary negatives taken by means of the camera. The process of toning is the same for the positive as the nega- tive, and in the same bath an indefinite number of either or both may be undergoing the process at the same time. The fact that the object needs to be partially translucent places limitations upon the application of the process, as likewise does the inability to enlarge or reduce the size of the object. There are, however, very many instances when the process may be employed with a considerable degree of satisfaction, and in some cases it is possible to bring out points of structure not re- corded by the ordinary methods of photography. The principle is different, for in the one reflected light is ordinarily employed and a surface picture only is obtained; but by the Solandi (Sol and I) process the picture is obtained by the unequal transmission of light through the different parts of the object. For example a leaf variegation may be confined to the surface cells and is easily caught by photography, but not in the sun print. On the other hand the variegation may be more than skin deep and the results may be reversed by the two methods. Any object that is naturally thin enough to permit the passage of light, even feebly, may become a subject for sun printing, the time of exposure © being correspondingly increased. Thick leaves like the orange, through which but little light seems to pass will give good prints after an exposure of a few hours, while ordinary leaves, as those ot the maple, are quickly done. The orange leaf is a case in point — a where the sun print reveals in a striking manner the number, size, position, etc., of the oil glands, all of which are not secured in the common photograph. Anything like the venation of leaves is of course secured’ with full details by the process of transmitted light. In like manner many good records can be made of the — various rusts, leaf spots and blights upon foliage, and excellent = pictures of wood are secured when thin sections in any direchion of ied gain are employed. 487 In the case of leaves the negative may be secured from the freshly gathered specimens without any preparation; but dry ob- jects from the herbarium work fully as well and often better when they are first saturated with the kerosene, in the same way as for the negative sun-prints and wiped free of excess of oil before being placed in the frame. It was my hope to show to the readers of the BULLETIN actual specimens of the work done by the Solandi process, but it may be even better to present two engravings, as they will indicate that the sun prints may be used for illustrations in printed articles with a fair degree of success. Figure 1 shows a leaf of the com- Fic. 1.—HoLtityHock LEAF WITH Rust (Puccinia malvacearum, Mont.). mon hollyhock badly infested with the rust (Puccinia malvacearum, Mont.); this object being chosen as one that is a fair average as pathological specimens go, there being no marked light and dark patches as seen from a surface view. The transmitted light brings out the sori of the Puccinia in sufficient prominence to make them fairly distinct and much better than could have been done by or- dinary photography. The second is another leaf (Polygonatum), 488 but of a widely different class from the mallow, in which the vein- ing is prominent and the work of a leaf miner is illustrated, as also the presence of a blight (Pyl/ostica cruenta, Fr.) following in the wake of the ruin caused by the insect and producing its fruit- ing pycnidia. By this process there is no opportunity for any minifying or magnifying of the object, and each detail is as exact as to size, location, etc., as possible. But the strongest pvints in favor of the process, aside from the merits of the results, are the ease with which the picture may be taken by any one, and the remarkable cheapness, for no camera or dark room is needed, and the whole time for the first exposure of the object until the positive is fin- Fic. 2.—LraF OF Polygonatum biflorum with Leaf-Miner, followed by Phyllosticta cruenta, FR. ished may not be more than three hours. There is nothing new in sun-printing, for Professor Kellerman and other American botanists have employed it. The chief point to be urged is the use of the clarifying agent, kerosene, for sub- jects when they are dry and for negative prints. This not only diminishes the time of exposure ten fold and more, but remark- ably sharpens the details of the positive picture. Byron D. HALsTED. RuTGERS COLLEGE, November 13, 1893. 489. The Index to recent Literature relating to American Botany. Following out a recommendation of the Committee on Biblio- graphy and Typography of the Madison Botanical Congress,* the form of our monthly record of American Botanical Literature will be changed in the next volume, so that the citations will be by authors instead of by subjects. It will be set in smaller type than the rest of the BULLETIN, and the titles will be printed off on library cards if a sufficient number of subscribers to these cards is _ obtained to justify their production. The proposed style of these cards is as here illustrated: Lagerheim, G. von. Ueber das Vorkommen von Europzischen Uredineen auf der Hochebene von Quito. Bot. Centralb. 54: 324- 331. 1893. Puccinia coronata and P. gramints are recorded as occurring in Ecuador, and Fusarium uredinis is described as new. Matthew, W.D. A Study of the Scale characters of the Northeast- ern American Species of Cuscuta. Bull. Torr. Bot. Club, 20: 310—- 314. pl. 164, 165. 10 Aug. 1893. _ Description and illustration of the corolla-scales, calyx and ovary of twelve species. All correspondence concerning these cards should be addressed to Tue CAMBRIDGE BOTANICAL Suppcy Co., CAMBRIDGE, Mass. i It is hoped that the record of papers may be made even more complete than hitherto, and if omissions are noted, it is earnestly requested that the attention of the editors may be called to them, The various journals and serial publications have been divided up among the editors, and Prof. Lucien M. Underwood, Prof. Con- way Macmillan, Mr. F. V. Coville and Dr. S. Ely Jelliffe, who have kindly consented to codperate in the work. | Botanical Notes. Heliotropism of the Common Mallow.—While in California _ some years ago my attention was drawn to the common mallow ——- * See Botanical Gazette, xvii. 355, and BULLETIN, xx. 371. 490 of the Pacific coast (Malva dorealis) on account of the very marked degree with which it exemplified the turning of leaves toward the sun. At the time a note was made upon the observa- tions for all times of day and night: in one of the botanical jour- nals. : The common mallow of the Eastern, Middle and Western States (Walva rotundifolia) is no exception, and when growing in rich soil free from all other vegetation the heliotropism is striking enough. While at the Madison meeting of the A. A. A. S., the writer called, in private, the attention of several botanists to the phenomenon, and as it proved to be new to them, the following note is ventured, feeling quite sure that it will call out response from others who have long observed the same thing. In the morning the blades of the leaves, if the day is clear, will be placed with their upper surface at right angles to the rays of the sun, and, by slowly turning, this position is maintained throughout the day. : Prof. Tracy informs me that the heliotropism of the cotton plant is well known even among the growers of the crops, and this leads one to wonder if the members of the Malvaceze may not be quite generally influenced in the same way. It would be interesting to learn of the observations in this direction that have _ been made upon our native plants of the mallow family. Byron D. HALstTeD. RUTGERS COLLEGE, October 13, 1893. Note on Scabiosa australis —It may be of interest to note that on the 24th of last September I visited the station for Scadiosa australis mentioned in the January, 1893, BULLETIN, and found the plant abundant. It is evidently spreading southward. Specimens were noticed in the village of Whitney’s Point, two miles south of the original locality. WILLARD N. CLUTE. BINGHAMTON, N. Y., October 29, 1893. 491 Proceedings of the Club. WEDNESDAY EVENING, NOVEMBER 29TH, 1893. Dr. J. Bernard Brinton in the chair and sixteen persons present. The following papers were read : “On the Genus Amelanchier, Medic.,’ by Dr. N. L. Hnnee illustrated by specimens. ‘ ne Geographical Disuibutian of the Plants of Pennsyl- vania,” by Prof. Thos. C. Porter. Dr. Britton exhibited a copy of Trew’s “ Plante Selectz,” re- cently acquired by the botanical library of Columbia College. Index to Recent Literature relating to American Botany. Aberrant Forms in Cultivated Diatoms. Samuel Lockwood (Am. Mo. Mic. Journ. xiv. 269—27 3). From “ Le Diatomiste,” June, 1893. Acer rubrum, var. Drummondi. . Spath (Gartenfl. xli. 357, with colored illustration). Additions to the Flora of Colorado—Fungt. T. D. A. Cockerell (Zoé, iv. 282). Aechmea Barleei. HH. Witte (Gartenfl. xli. 359, with illustration). Agave Americana. N. H. George and L. Wittmack (Gartenfl. xli. 269, with figures). Ampelopsis guinquefolia—A Variety of. E. B. Knerr (Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci. xiii. 69). Annual Report of the State Botanist of the State of New York. Charles H. Peck (45th Rep. N. Y. State Mus. Nat. Hist., Al- bany, 1893; reprint). | A list of plants not heretofore recorded from the State is given, fifteen or more species of Fungi are described as new, a study of - the New York species of the genus Omphalia and other notes. , a ee sobre alcunos Helechos Mexicanos de la aren de las. José N. Rovirosa (Naturaleza (Ser. ii.) ii. 1 79). 492 With illustrations of species of Asplenium, Darea, Cenopieris, Athyrium, Diplazium, Hemidictyum and Anisogonium. Bacterial Flora of the Atlantic Ocean in the Vicinity of Wood's Holl’ Mass. H.L. Russell (Bot. Gaz. xviii. 383-395, 411-419; one plate). Baptisia leucophea. (Meehan’s Month. iii. 177, with colored plate.) Bugraphical Skizzen—I. Friedrich Sellow. Ign. Urban (Engler’s Bot. Jahrb. xvii. 177-198). Biographical sketch of this South American botanical collector, whose specimens have added so much to our knowledge of the flora of Brazil and Uruguay. Bocconia arborea—Estudios relativos a la. Manuel M. Villada (Naturaleza (Ser. ii.) ii. 207). Botanical Aspect of Pike's Peak—The. WV. avard (Gard. and For. vi. 452). Botanical Notes from Texas. E. N. Plank (Gard. and For. vi. 272; 513). Botanical Notes. Alice Eastwood (Zoé, iv. 186). Botany of Martha's Vineyard—Observations on the Geology and. Arthur Hollick (Trans. N. Y. Acad. Sci. xiii. 8; reprint). Brasilianischen Nutz-und Heilpflanzen—Die. Theodor Peckholt (Pharm. Rundsch. xi. 287). Brassavola glauca. Alexander Bode (Gartenfl. xli. 176, with — figure). 3 Calceolaria andina. J.D. Hooker (Curtis Bot. Mag. xlix. t. 7326). __ Describes a new species from Chili. Californian Flora—Southern Extension of. T. S. Brandegee (Zoé, iv. 199). Californian Uredinee—New. P. Dietel (Erythea, i. 247-252). | Descriptions of new species in Uredo, Uromyces and Puccinia. Cane Diseases and Pests in Trinidad, J.H. Hart (Bull. Misc. Infor. Trinidad, Roy. Bot. Gard., June, 1893). : _ Carduus heterolepis. J. N. Rose (Erythea, i. 234). | Saleloae of the North American Phenogams and Vascular Crypto- e coiget in the Blake Herbarium. te thes and F. P. Bae 493 Composite Flora of Kausas—The Relations of the. A. S. Hitchcock (Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci. xiii. 89). Contributions to Western Botany. Marcus E. Jones (Zoé, iv. 254). Includes a Revision of the American species of Aquilegia north | of Mexico, notes on Zowssendia, and descriptions of new species or varieties in Thelypodium, Caulanthus, Lepidium, Astragalus, Poten- tilla, Frasera, Emmenanthe, Phacelia, Gilia, Pentstemon and Erio- gonum. Corrections in Nomenclature—IlT, Edw. L. Greene (Erythea, i. 206-208). The name Forsellesia is proposed for Glossopetalon, A. Gray (1853) not Schreber, and Bourdonia for Keerlia, A. Gray (1852) not D. C. Sutneria, Duham., is taken up for Calycanthus, L. Two species of Lotus and three of Astragalus, bearing homonyms, are re-named. Corrections in Nomenclature—IV. Edw. L. Greene (Erythea, i. 246, 247). Prof. Greene maintains that his generic name Carlomohria should be adopted for Ha/esta, Ellis, and here names the species. He also proposes Cofina for Mohria, Sw., which he holds to be a homonym of Morea. Species of Zradescantia and Delphinium are re-named, and Mimulus Congdoni, Robinson, is transferred to Lunanus. Delphinum—Neue Arten der Gattung. E. Huth (Bull. Herb. Boiss. i. 327~336; Pl. 14-17). D. Penardi and D. Barbeyi, from Colorado, and D. Ehrenbergii, from Mexico are characterized. Diatomacee of Minnesota. Inter-Glacial Peat. Benjamin W. Thomas (20th Ann. Rep. Geol. and Nat. Hist. Survey of Minnesota ; pp. 291-320). Diatomacee—What ts a species in the? Arthur M. Edwards (Am. is Month. Micr. Journ. xiii. 212). 2 Dipladenia atropurpurea. eas xliv. 488, with colored illustra- . tions.) | __Erythronium mesochoreum, ¥. B. Knerr;Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci. 494 flora of Bouldin Island. Katharine Brandegee (Zoe, iv. 211). flora of Greenland—A Contribution to the. WW. ¥E. Meehan (Proc. Acad. Sci. Phila., April, 1893, 205). : Flora of Kansas—Additions to the. B. B. Smyth (Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci. xiii. 96). Flora of Staten Island— Additions to the. W.T. Davis (Proc. Nat. Sci. Assoc. Staten Island, Oct. 14, 1893). Flowering Plants and Ferns Collected in Franklin County, Kansas—_ A List of. W.E. Castle (Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci. xiii. 80.) fungi—New West American. J. B. Ellis and B. M. Everhart _ (Erythea. i. 197-206). Descriptions of twenty-nine species in various genera. Fungus from the Coal Measures—A New. H. “dupes (Am. Geol. Xii. 289, 290, PI. xiii.). A description of the new genus and species, Dactyloporus archeus, from the carboniferous formation in Tuscarawas county, Ohio. It is stated to be generically allied to Polyporus as to its sporiferous tubes, and again to Agaricus by its pileus and trunk. ~ A wretchedly poor plate, similar in execution to others which have recently appeared in the same publication, accompanies the description. Georgia ( Tetraphis) pellucida et les Espeeces alliees. N.C. Kindberg (Rev. Bryol. xx. 92, 1893). Four North American species are briefly described, of which two bear new names. Georgia cuspidata is said to be different from G. pellucida in the curved capsules and excurrent vein of the pericheetial leaves. The specimens were collected in Canada by Macoun, and near Columbus, Ohio, by Schrader. We have seen Prof. Macoun’s specimens and do not think them worthy of spe- — cific rank as the capsules are often curved and the pedicels very variable in length in G. pellucida; on the same plant the vein a may disappear below the apex in the lower bracts, and be excur- ae rent in the upper. G. trachypoda is said to differ from G. geniculata in the seta Be being rough above, not below and not geniculate. It will be re-_ i fueeibicres, that Braithwaite cites a variety aber Lindb., founded 495 on North American specimens of G. pellucida, with curved cap- sules, and that the pedicel of G. geniculata is described as rough above the bend, not below. jG eRe _ Gilia superba. Phacelia nudicaulis. Alice Eastwood (Zoé, iv, 296). The author reduces the two above species to Gilia subnuda, Torr., and Phacelia demissa, A. Gray. Gossypium lanceforme, Miers. James Britten (Journ. Bot. xxxi. 330-331). Description of a new species from Mexico. Grasses from Mexico—Descriptions of new. ae Vasey (Contr. U. S. Nat. Herb. i. 281). New species of Paspalum, Panicum, Aristida, Muhlenbergia, Sporobolus and Eragrostis are described. Grasses from the United States—Descriptions of new or noteworthy. George Vasey (Contr. U. S. Nat. Herb. i. 267). Descriptions of new species of Stipa, Orysopsis, Muhlenbergia, - Sporobolus, Bouteloua, Sieglingia, Eragrostis, Melica, Poa, Festuca, and Elymus. Grasses—Notes on some Pacific Coast. George Vasey (Contr. U. S. Nat. Herb. i. 265.. Guide to the Study of the Common Plants. Volney M. Spalding (12 mo. pp. xxiii. 246. Boston, Heath & Co., 1893). Halesia vy. Mohria. WW. Watson (Gard. and For. vi. 486). Halesia vs. Mohria oa Mohrodendron. J. 4. Redfield, N. L. Brit- ton (Gard. and For. vi. 518). Heuchera sanguinea. (Gartenfl. xli. 617, with colored plate.) Indefinite Stamens and subsessile Pods in Cleome. Edw. L. Greene (Erythea, i. 233-234). | Introduced Plants in the Arid Region. E. L. Berthould (Bot. Gaz, xviii. 435). : 5 Lamin eo Die aN, ee ee and Geographical Distribution (Of the. William Albert Setchell (Trans. Conn. Acad. ix. 333, _ - reprint). ; ae ae Hair Structures—On certain. Walter C. Blasdale (Erythea, i i. : cl atalas one aang 496 Liatris scariosa. N. E. Brown (Gardn. Chron. xiv. 593, with figure). : Lichens from California and Mexico, collected by Dr. Edward Palmer from 1888—1892—List of. J. W. Eckfeldt (Contr. U.S. Nat. Herb. i. 291). Lobeliaceous Plants—Twe rare. Edw. L. Greene (Erythea, i. 237, 238). The genus Baclea is proposed for the Vemacladus DES tfolius, Robinson, and Bolelia lata described as new. Maize—A Botanical and Economic Study. John W. Harshberger (Contr. Bot. Lab. Univ. Penn. i. No. 2, 75-202; three plates). Masdevallia racemosa. F. C. Lehmann (Gartnfl. xli. 488, illus- trated). Michigan Plants—_New and rare. G.¥H. Hicks (Asa Gray Bull. No. 3, 1893). Novitates occidentales—V. Edward L. Greene (Erythea, i. 221— 224). New species and varieties are described in Astragalus, Amelan- clier, Saxifraga, Arabis, Senecio and Ptiloria. Novitates occidentales—VT. Edw. L. Greene (Erythea, i i. 258-260). Descriptions of new species in Lotus, Helianthemum, Poly- gonum and Uropappus. New Plants—Descriptions of three. J. N. Rose (Contr. U. S. Nat. Herb. i. 289). Ranunculus Cooleye and Ligusticum Macounii from Alaska, and Spheralcea Orcuttii from the Colorado Desert, are the “species hee described. ‘ s New Plants from Texas and Colorado—Descriptions of four. J. M2 Holzinger (Contr. U. S. Nat. Herb. i. 288). . Descriptions of Claytonia Bodini, Baptisia lanceolata, vat. Texana, Stemodia Schotti, and Oxybaphus Bodini. Ce Odontoglossum constrictum, Lindl., var. Sanderianum, Roch. aS Kranzlin (Gartenfl. xli. 65). : me Odontoglossum cirrhosum. iL Wittmack a xli. |. 593: wi Le colered eae 497 Our Native Ferns and their Allies. 1.M. Underwood (Fourth Edi- tion, revised, 1893). The author continues to improve this valuable little book, by bringing the list of publications under each chapter up to date, and incorporating the results of recent investigations and collec- tion, as well as revising the nomenclature to conform to the Rochester Code. It supplies in a handy and’ inexpensive form much valuable information, and besides its high scientific value is an interesting and attractive addition to the library. Papaveraceas—Los Alcaloides de las. Manuel M. Villada (Natur- aleza (Ser. ii.) ii. 212). . Perityle rotundifolia (Amauria). T.S. Brandegee (Zoé, iv. 210). _Phanerogamic Parasites—On the Structure of the Haustoria of Some. George J. Pierce (Ann. Bot. vii. 291, with plates). Phenogams and Vascular Cryptogams of Maine—A Contribution to the. F.L. Harvey and F. P. Briggs (Bull. Maine State Col- lege Lab. i. No 2). Phyllospadix—The Genus. William Russell Dudley (Wilder Quarter-Century Book, Ithaca, N. Y., 1893, reprint). A critical study of the genus, with illustrations of P. Zorreye Pinon Gathering among the Parramint Indians. B. H. Dutcher (Am. Anthrop. Oct. 1893). Describing the gathering of the nuts of Pinus monophylla. Pitcairnia floccosa. . Wittmack and C. E. Kirschoff (Gartenfl. xli. 352, with figures.) Plante Glazioviane nove. minus cognite. P. Taubert (Bot. Jahrb. Xvii. 502). New species from Brazil are described in the genera Saccog- lottis, Oxalis, Poecilandra, Drosera, Turnera, Klotzschia, Didymo- panax, Gaylussacia, Agarista, Buddleia, Coccoloba, Cryptocarya, Hufelandia, Acrodiclidium, Phebe, Ocotea, Pellea, Anemia, and thirteen species of fungi. A new genus in the Gentianacee, with one species, Senea caerulea, is also described. _ Plants Collected by the Garfield University Expedition of 1889—List ah Me Pec Carleton (Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci. xii. 50). ve 498 Plant Intelligence. Walter C. Kerr (Proc. Nat. Sci. Assoc. Staten Island, Oct. 14, 1893). Description of the movements exhibited by the flowering scape of Ezchornia crassipes. Plants of Mason County, Mich. H. T. Blodgett (Asa Gray Bull. No. 3, 1893). Planis New to Florida—tList of. J. M. Holzinger (Contr. U. S. Nat. Herb. i. 288). Popular American Plant Names—II. Fanny D. Bergen (Bot. Gaz. xviii. 411). ; _ Preliminary Report of the Microscopical Organisms of the Brooklyn Water Supply. Smith Ely Jelliffe (Brooklyn Medical Journal, Vii. 593-617). A report is made upon the organisms found during the six months from November, 1892, to May, 1893, and details of the method of examination, a short resumé of the work done in sim- ilar lines, the seasonal distribution and the sanitary relationships are discussed. A series of plates giving the comparative abund- ance of the organisms is given; a partial bibliography of the American titles on the microscopical examinations of water sup-_ plies. Three plates, representing most of the organisms that _ appear in the lists, close the contribution. Quercus Prinos (Gardn. Chron. xiv. 61, with figure). Report of the Botanist. 1. R. Jones (Report Vermont State Agric. Exp. Sta. for 1892, illustrated). Report on “ Cacao” in Nicaragua. (Bull. Roy. Bot. Gard. Trinidad, Sept., 1893.) Report upon the Hills of Louisiana, south of the U. S. and P. R. R., to Alexandria, La—A preliminary. Part II. Otto Lerch (pamph. pp. 159, Baton Rouge, 1893). This is a characteristic elementary document, designed for popular use. There are some facts in regard to the distribution __ of plants which are of interest, and these may be found under | _ ‘Botanical Notes’ on pages 151-158. Thus the trees andshrubs _ ; are grouped according to the character of the soil in which they grow, which is always a matter of interest. A list of twenty her- 499 baceous plants is also included, under the heading ‘ Medicinal Herbs,’ and finally there is what purports to be a list of ‘Grasses.” In this latter may be noted species of Carex, Scirpus, Cyperus, Jun- cus, Eleocharis, Rhyncospora, Lespedeza (/) etc. OS » Rhipsalis Warmingiana. G. A. Lindberg (Gartenfl. xli. 8, with figures). Riparian Botany of the Lower Sacramento. Willis L. Jepson (Erythea, i. 238-246). Robinia Neo-Mexicana. \. Wittmark and F. Brettschneider (Gar- tenfl. xli. 649, with colored plate). Rodriguesia Calopectron. ¥E. Regel (Gartenfl. xli. 281, with colored plate). Rubber of the Orin iets A. Ernst (Bull. Misc. Infor. Trin- idad, Roy. Bot. Gard., June, 1893). Describing Hevea Brasiliensis and the methods by which the rubber is collected. . Rust of Mountain Ash—The. Byron D. Halsted (Gard. and For. vi. 508). Note on Gymnosporangium globosum. Salvinia natans on Staten Island. W. C. Kerr (Proc. Nat. Sci. Assoc. Staten Island, October 14, 1893). Record. of its recent introduction. Sap of Trees and its Movements—The so-called. Charles R. Barnes (Science, xxi. 239-241). An address delivered before the State Horticultural Society of Wisconsin. Sectioning Fern Prothallia and other delicate Objects W. B. Thomas (The Microscope (II.) i. 167-168). Selective Absorption of Heat by Leaves. G. A. Meyer (Trans. Kan- sas Acad. Sci. xiii. 48). : Senecio sagittifolius. J. D. Hooker (Curtis Bot. Mag. xlix. t. 7322). | Describes a new species from Uruguay. Serjania—Arten—Drei neue. L. Radlkofer (Bull. Herb. Boiss. i. 464-468). ee a | ar betes 500 S, alurigera from Peru, S. /ateritia from Guatemala, and S. didymadenia from Bolivia (Rusby, 517, distributed as S. clematidt- _Solia, Camb. ?). Skizze der Vegetationsverhalinisse von Santiago in Chile. 1o & Meigen (Engler's Bot. Jahrb. xvii. 199-294). A general account of the flora of the region, supplemented by a list of several hundred species collected by the author, novelties being described in the following genera: Calceolaria, Draba, Gilia C:nothera, Pernettya, Senecio, Solanum and Valeriana. Sudamerikanische Hochgebirgspflanzen. WW. Siber (Gartenfl. xli. 425,452). With colored illustrations of Paranephelius uniflorus, Espeletia grandiflora, Eryngium pumillum and Veronica cupres- sotdes. Laxodium distichum. Maxwell T. Masters (Gardn. Chron. xiv. 659, with figure.) Lexas Trees—Notes on Some of the. J. Reverchon (Gard. and For. Vi. 503). Aisculus arguta, Roped marginatus, Rhus copalina, var. lan- ceolata, Sophora affinis, Prosopis juliflora and Bumelia lanuginosa are the species discussed. Tillandsia Lorentziana Griseb. und andere Argentinische Arten— Bemerkungen zu. ¥F. Kurtz (Gartenfl. xli. 404). Uredinee of the San Francisco Bay Region—The. WV. C. Blasdale (Asa Gray Bull. No. 3, 1893). Vagrant Crucifers. John Higgins (Asa Gray Bull. No. 3, 1893). Variations in Dominant Species of Plants. W. A. Carleton (Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci. xiii. 24). Victoria regia. HH. Gaerdt (Gartenfl. xli. 651). = _ ‘Vitis Baileyana, Munson. T. V. Munson (Leaflet, pp. 2, dated June 20, 1893, issued November, 1893). Description of the grape first described by Mr. Munsonas V. Virginiana; this name being a homonym of a Lamarckian species — af is here changed to the above. Vitis in Kansas—The Distribution of the Genus. A. ia Hitchcock ie 1 Sees Raises Acad. Sci, xiii. 79). 501 Water Lily Trees—The. ¥.W. Burbidge (Garden, xliv. 438). With colored illustration of Magnolia Fraseri. West American Conifere—Notes on—ITI, J. G. Lemmon (Ery- thea, i. 224-231). : Mr. Lemmon here discusses the synonymy and nomenclature of the Monterey Pine and the Knob-cone Pine, and concludes that the former should be known as Pinus radiata, Don, and the latter as P. attenuata, Lemmon. Western Kansas—Some Notes on Condensed Vegetationin. Minnie Reed (Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci. xiii. 91). Winter-Killing of Trees and Shrubs—The. Aven Nelson (Wyo- ming Exper. Sta. Bull. No. 15, 1893). Contributions from the Herbarium of Columbia No. 8 No. 17. No, 18. i, Meet Ge Britton: (Bon). 0 eo College. A Preliminary List of North American species of Cyferus, with Descriptions of New Forms. By N. L. Britton (1886),. .... + + + « 25 cents. Cerastium arvense, L., and its North American Varieties. By Arthur Hol- lick and N, L. Britton (1887). (Out of print.) _ Plant Notes from Temiscouata County, Canada. By J. I. Northrop (1887). (Out of print.) __ A List of Plants Collected by Miss Mary B. Croft at San Diego, Texas. By N. L. Britton and H. H. Rusby (1887), ......... 25 cents, New or Noteworthy North American Phanerogams. By N. L. Britton CROCE sy el ae ia ee BE Orin Goan Soe ae ak a 25 cents. An Enumeration of the Plants Collected by Dr. H. H. Rusby in South America, 1886-1887. By N. L. Britton. (Twenty-three parts published ; not yet completed.) The Genus Aicoria of Rafinesque. By N. L. Britton (1888), . . 25 cents. A Recent Discovery of Hybrid Oaks on Staten Island. By Arthur Hollick. RRO sg Oe et ee An ie 25 cents. A List of Plants Collected by Dr. E. A. Mearns at Fort Verde and in the Mogollon and San Francisco Mountains, Arizona, 1884-1888. By N. L- Britton. ; The General Floral Characters of the San Francisco and Mogollon Mountains and the Adjacent Region. By H. H. Rusby (IBRD tho g 2 25 cents. Contributions to American Bryology—An Enumeration of the Mosses Col- lected by Mr. John B, Leiberg in Kootenai County, Idaho. By Elizabeth G. Britton, (Out of print.) Preliminary Notes on the North American Species of the Genus 77ssa,. Adams. - By WN, 1a Britton (4880); 0 oes gg 25 cents. The Genus £/eocharis in North America, By N. L. Britton (1889), 25 cents. — New or Noteworthy North American Phanerogams, II. By N. L. Britton IO kee eee -, , 85 conte A List of State and Local Floras of the United States and British America. By N. Tx Britton (1890)/ 09070 5 ts a es $x. A Descriptive List of Species of the Genus Heuchera. By Wn. E. Wheel- OR CEN), ae a ee ee ye - age New or Noteworthy North American Phanerogams, III. By N. L. Britton CUO ee ee as 25 cents. The Flora of the Desert of Atacama. By Thos. Morong (1891), 25 cents. _ Contributions to American Bryology, II. A supplementary Enumeration of Mosses collected by Mr. John B. Leiberg in Kootenai County, Idaho, By No. 35- No, 36. No. 37: No. 38. No. 39. Notes on North American Halorage. By Thos. Morong (+891),.25 cents. New or Noteworthy North American Phanerogams, IV. By N, L. Britton. (TOQR) rc eal ee ie . . 25 cents. Notes on the North American Species of Eriocaulee. By Thos, Morong’ CUO I ce ee we oe ee : se CONE, New or Noteworthy North American Phanerogams, V. By N. L. Britton (Ne ee ee ey . . 25 cents. The American Species ot the Gent Anemone and the Genera which have been referred to it. By N. L. Britton (1891),. . . . 25 cents. Review of the North American Species of the Genus Xyris. By Heinrich mies CIB0A)s yt 7. ts. 328 cents. A Preliminary List of the Species of the Gens: Meibomia occurring in the United States and British America. By Anna M. Vail (1892), . 25 cents. A List of Species of the Genera Scirpus and Aynchospora occurring in North America. By N. L. Britton (1892),... . . . . 25 cents. Note on a Collection of Tertiary Fossil Plants from Potosi Bolivia. By N. L. Britton (1892), . $53 . 25 cents, The Anatomy of the Stem of Wistaria Shas By Carlten C. Curtiss (1892), .. 2§ cents. New or Noteworthy North hinickes Phaldssruiiaiise, VI. “By N. L. Britton CRBs ee ee ee ee ee ge Oe : 25 cents. — Ranunculus repens and its Eastern North Aniesteast Alles. By N. L, Britton (1892), oe DCA ee ig gt ae 25 cents. A Preliminary List of Acsierloads Species of je emnners By John K. Small. (1892), pe ee ghy igs Dea eras ma ig gr mimmen renee ear. Ch yee 25 cents, West Virginia Niceoehc: By Elizabeth G. Britton (1892), -, . 39 cents; A New Species of Listera, with Notes on Other Orchids. By Thos. Morong. (1893), . . 25 cents. The North Aomerichn’ Species oe Lisa: By N. ‘ Britton (1893), 25 cents. An Enumeration of the Plants Collected by Dr. Thos. Morong in Paraguay 1888-1890. By Thomas Morong and N. L. Britton, with the assistance of Miss Anna Murray Vail (1892-1893), . . .. $1.50 An Examination of the Seeds of some Native Orchids. By Carlton C. Curtiss (tee eg er ne a cee ee eg _ . 25 cents, Further Notes on Asoericani Species of Polygonum. By John K. Small (1893), : 25 cents New or Noteworthy North American Pheserogeins; VII. By N. L. Britton (MOG 3 Bi es Ae ee ., 25 cents, Contributions to American Bryology, IIL— Notes on he North American Species of Orthotrichum. By Elizabeth G. Britton, 25 cents. The whole. series with the exception of Nos. 2, 3, 6 and 10 will be supplied for $5. Copies of the Catalogue of Plants found in New Jersey cde by N. L. Britton, may be had for $2. Address qu): ae § HOS. MORONG, _ Curator of the Herbarium, Columbia College, NEW YORK CITY. F. W. DEVOE & CO. ESTABLISHED 1852. OFFICES, CORNER FULTON AND WILLIAM STREETS, New York. “ARTISTS - PATERIALS. Sketching Outfits of All Kinds. Tube Colors, Water Colors, Crayons, Drawing Paper. Canvas, Brushes, Oils and Mediums. Mathematical Instruments, House Painters’ Colors. Fresco Colors. Fine Varnishes. CORRESPONDENCE INVITED CATALOGUES OF OUR DIFFERENT DEPARTMENTS TO RESPONSIBLE PARTIES. _ COFFIN, DEVOE & CO,, 176 RANDOLPH ST. CHICAGO. ‘Cambridge Botanical Supply Co. Successors to all Business in Botanical Supplies in CAMBRIDGE, MASS., DEAELRS IN Herbarium and Laboratory Materials and Ap- paratus, Microscopes, Books, Specimens, Everything Useful to Botanists. Se pele aeititensi Cameme GUARANTEED. 1 ~ WILLIAM WALES, Fort Lee, N. i MANUFACTURER OF FIRST-CLASS MICROSCOPE OBJECTIVES. MICROSCOPES FURNISHED OF ALL MAKES—ZENTMAYER’S AL- WAYS ON HAND. INSTRUMENTS ORDERED IN NEW YORK CITY SENT ON APPROVAL. DISCOUNT TO COLLEGES. FoR SALE. de A ZENTMAYER PORTABLE MICROSCOPE, IN PERFECT ORDER, For $100.00. - - - Catalogue Price, $147.50. Including THREE OBJECTIVES, 1} in., 4 in., and } in Also an Abbé Condenser, Glass Stage, and Neat Walnut Case. Address the Editors of the Bulletin, °° Wm. Wales, Fort Lee, N. J. CHARACEA OF AMERICA. The first fascicle of the Second Part of the Characez of America is now ready. It contains descriptions of eight species of Vite//a, as fol- lows: Vitella opaca, Ag.; obtusa, Allen; montana, Allen; Blankin- shipit, Allen; Alissouriensis, Allen; flexilis, Ag.; subglomerata, A. Br. ; glomerulifera, A. Br., with fourteen full-page illustrations (eight litho- graphic plates and six photogravures). ‘These fascicles will be issued ‘from time to time as plates can be prepared ; price of each part $1, the actual cost, if the whole edition of 500 copies be sold. Address ‘Se dee: cdah nds 10 East 36th St., N. ¥. M ISSOURL ‘PLANTS, The undersigned has over 1,000 Species of Missouri Plants for sale, including collections recently made in the southern part ot the State. All good specimens. Price, $8.00 per 100 Specimens. HENRY EGGERT, 918 Wash Street, - - - St. Louls, vib KENTUCKY PLANTS. The undersigned offers for sale Sets of his Plants collected in Southeastern Kentucky during the past summer. The Sets aver- age about 250 Species, and will be sold at the rate of $38.00 per 100. T. H. KEARNEY, Jr., Columbia College, - - - - #£New York City. ESTABLISHED 1851. EIMER & AMEND, MANUFACTURERS AND IMPORTERS OF Chemicals and Chemical Apparatus, 205, 207, _ & 211 Third Ave., Zi . Corner of 18th Street, Super Chemists ¢ Soa "LABORATORY OUTFITS NEW YORK. SOLE AGENTS FOR THE UNITED coe ke OF NORTH AMERICA, FOR | EB. March’s Szline Chemical, Scone Ware. oy Schleicher & Schuell’s “Chemically - Pure and Common Filter Paper Doctor C. Scheibler’s Sacchar ters (Polariscopes). oe Prof. Jolly’s Specific Gravity” ances, etc. ae Brun F. Desmontes & Co BF Sore Hae anne - PUBLICATIONS OF THE CLUB. a a ) THE BULLETIN. ; : This" journal has been published consecutively smee 1870, pesianue with feast pages: monthly, gradually increasing, until in 1892 over 32 pages monthly with | many full page illustrations were issued, The subscription price is $2 per annum. ‘Terms for England and the Continent of Europe, 10 shillings. Agents for England, Messrs. DuLau & Co., 37 Soho Square, London, England. SACK Numpers.—The BuLLETIN was published from 1870 to 1875, sphiives: y volumes, and was indexed at the end of the five years. The price of these volumes is $5.00. The numbers from 1875 to 1879, inclusive, were allowed to on as one volume (Vol. VI.), and were indexed at the end of the five years. The price of this volume is $5.00. Volumes VII. to XVII. have been indexed separately, and ; general index to them printed in pamphlet form, which inay be | had. for 5e. cents, bigs wie of hog is oe oo. Vols. XVIII. and XIX. are indexed pre price i is aa’ at $3.00 per ‘velo a in Seta tie : mbers sec ‘singly and an invariable price will be ni = each, , soa Algze hitherto” oS ‘the eae Margiiale, desis cine