Monitoring at the New London Disposal Site 1992-1998 Volume | Disposal Area Monitoring System DAMOS pcre ete ne RIT LSID Sm | . — ies fx . re Ne” f x fi payer a ot ATM k ‘Y A A FX \ HN 2 i rei : \ i B fe \ | ; Vis | thas BNE 3 nhic Inston | iY) looas Hol ste J} \\C \siituten | 4 WYOQUS bs eG Bale rETPETED : amino ial Peer D A|M O § DISPOSAL AREA MONITORING SYSTEM Contribution 128 January 2001 (“es my Corps gineers @ (84 England District bot Ff no. Z& ; Form approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB Ne O02 O1RE Public reporting concern for the collection of information is estimated to avelare 1 hour per persons including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and measuring data needed and correcting and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information includin SURGE SHOns efferson for reducing this burden to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate tor Information Observations and Records, 1216 Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302 and to the Office of Management and Support. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (LEAVE BLANK) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND January 2001 DATES Final Report 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Monitoring at the New London Disposal Site 1992-1998 Volume I 6. FUNDING NUMBERS 6. AUTHORS Suis F 5 Science Applications International Corporation 7. PERFROMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING Science Applications International Corporation ORGANIZATION REPORT 221 Third Street Newport, RI 02840 SAIC No. 515 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAMES(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/ US Army Corps of Engineers-New England District MONITORING AGENCY 696 Virginia Rd DAMOS Contribution Concord, MA 01742-2751 Number 128 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES Available from : DAMOS PROGRAM MANAGER Regulatory Branch, USACE-NAE 696 Virginia Rd oncord MA _01742- 12a. DISTRIBUTION/AVAIABILTY STATEMENT 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 13. ABSTRACT Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) conducted monitoring surveys of the New London Disposal Site (NLDS) in August, 1992; August, 1995; September, 1997; and July, 1998, as part of the Disposal Area Monitoring System (DAMOS) Program. Field operations in each survey year included data collection of one or more of the following: precisionbathymetric surveys, Remote Ecological Monitoring of the Seafloor (REMOTS) sediment-profile surveys, and surface and near-bottom dissolved oxygen determinations. Since its inception in 1977, the Disposal Area Monitoring System (DAMOS) Program has investigated dredging and dredged material disposal practices in an effort to minimize adverse physical, chemical, and biological impacts. DAMOS utilizes a flexible, tiered management approach centered around comprehensive environmental monitoring to oversee the placement of sediments at nine open water disposal sites along the coast of New England. Active disposal sites are surveyed on a regular basis to ensure the effects of dredged material disposition on the benthic habitat are localized and temporary. There has been an active dredged material disposal site near New London since at least 1955. DAMOS monitoring of the New London Disposal Site started in 1977 when the program was established. In 1996, the boundary of the New London Disposal Site shown in DAMOS graphics was shifted in accordance with the Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement, resulting in a 0.2 nmi northerly shift of the disposal site. The new, northern region was surveyed in 1997. The New London disposal site has been used for on-going disposal throughout the 1990’s, including unconfined disposal of suitable sediments, and capped disposal of unsuitable sediments. This report, Volume I, summarizes the disposal and monitoring activities conducted from the 1991-1992 dredging season through monitoring in July, 1998. This information is presented as a single report to provide a clear, concise picture of use of the New London Disposal Site during this time-frame and to include important monitoring information related to the dredged material mounds. Additional disposal and monitoring information related to the U.S. Navy Seawolf Mound during this time period are to be presented in Volume II. During the 1991-1992 disposal season, the NLDS received a total barge volume of 104,200 m3 of dredged material generated from four separate projects in the eastern Long Island Sound region. Disposal resulted in creation of two disposal mounds, the Dow/Stonington (D/S) mound, consisting of unsuitable dredged material (Dow and Stonington sediments) and suitable cap material (Dow sediments), and the NL-91 mound immediately north of the D/S mound. Bathymetric surveys and REMOTS data, which were fully developed using pre- and post-capbathymetric survey data analyzed in 1994-1995, showed that due to errors in navigation, while some cap material covered the D/S mound, most of the cap material was deposited approximately 250 m east of the mound. Following the misplacement of some of the cap material, additional cap material has been deposited at the site as it becomes available, to steadily increase cap thickness over the mound. REMOTS surveys of the D/S mound conducted in 1992, 1995, 1997, and 1998, showed no adverse impactstrong signs of benthic community recovery and the continued presence of a stable benthic community, minimizing concem about potential adverse effects. During the 1994-1995 dredging season, two new capped mounds were created at the NLDS, including the U.S. Coast Guard Academy (USCGA) mound, and New London 1994 (NL-94) mound. Although monitoring in August, 1995, indicated the NLDS area was experiencing low oxygen bottom waters, it appeared to be part of a regional, seasondlypoxia event that is unrelated to dredged material disposal. The benthic community at the newly formed disposal mounds was comparable to the reference areas. Additional disposal activities conducted at the New London Disposal Site during this time frame consist of creation of thSeawolf mound with sediments from the New London Naval Submarine Base, the Thames River navigational channel, and two smaller dredging projects. Monitoring of this mound conducted in 1997 and 1998 is discussed in Volume II. 14. SUBECT TERMS 15.NUMBER OF PAGES New London Disposal Site oR OD 17. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF REPORT 18. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION }19. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION ]20.LIMITATION OF UNCLASSIFIED OF THIS PAGE ABSTRACT A meainsy te erin bemanannallieetibie be GR thn iatt le htt (a hie WANs Iyrrpilc abies ies: + india Areatlgrecre sey | ae ae a (aan ae S Rais Ny aaa i in teal Pe: rs GAD Ryd gui Di ff bs . raul pn © fae g g peti Loa halts ayia (C4 he i Da oes) tt Tepe tt ‘guts FPR a 6 “dioteepc sui essa : me a i oY vie a, ‘s iene ali Whe Ep dps Haren iin see ernie pe ear ls Qh lores ae Fe ae oe . fn ‘Sh OD we wt ay gael Aci at NE alae i a SRN ald NM Gi a a Any Py eh ey Bd, SOK Uleatnid (Be, TR ane ean amb sale cabs he ager we Babiuls sia vy Bin Lins ae, r on9 Lavi an sei i met. r. spre Bathed | wai we ir a ee jes i she 9 tm, apie ce y ly 2 “yale. joealonbtl ; . ‘ tee marer i in ines 4 Hii ; Rew. uh gintarag eA % uhh of eel att maka £ ce aimed Ob: nite Male oink A na Ee et en le a ny 2 ie ak: MONITORING AT THE NEW LONDON DISPOSAL SITE 1992-1998 VOLUME I CONTRIBUTION #128 January 2001 Report No. SAIC-515 Submitted to: Regulatory Branch New England District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 696 Virginia Road Concord, MA 01742-2751 Submitted by: Science Applications International Corporation Admiral’s Gate 221 Third Street, Newport, RI 02840 (401) 847-4210 Te er engioars 01 0 New England District eee os <= _ ns ene = a ye oe 7 naire: e) tontizannatel svi bom 1 or pancetta 7 tela Neds earning has lam apmagme mel aye: net y ee rt my SDA OviAOTIVOM Rie Gian Te LAROTAIG AOUKON Wa ce Oke PROT BOOK 8 PV 0 ie LIMUIOV Oeste he dr laa ie 6 Lo asik MOLTUAATAOD (008 igimuniwt Gest EN ee BAAR Ate ieti © ren A mee 4] 5) “oh holtindue chuslinedl euntabienesl ioiverd Buslgadt veh predeign’ Jo vaio vm, 2 gy ees aisigh Bey ae TSObF TO AM Joon pr anemia. there" Reateay, | a ier Oh igi | en TABLE OF CONTENTS Page IST OR MAB IEE Senet ele wel tees wc camila cg caicincie oo aaa Motte EN TEM RAN eae Vv METS TOES EGR Sooo ge sass accra cai c ate la CES Tas ETE Ae cic ein (cine ofc Meiofherond sieiscie oe Soc Vil EOE COMIVESWOMIMAIR YI renee ee eee en beens toes chu yaaiuucan aenaeeesene hoo ce de eale canoes X11 (PORe IN ROD WEDIONis:... ce--ccensences sss cess ceeeses 11 1.3.3 Septembers1997/ Monitoring*Survicy -..--e.-te erate cecessecesn cece 12 1.3.4 Julyst99S MonitorimoeSurveyeerses-sacceseeeerees cose seen 12 1.3.5 NEDSiNorthermmRegione ees. ta. 2. see Peet acne cee aoe 13 CAO mare VUE HODS» sso sndasdncsscedsscaseeress ceaenee een et Se se ee ht 22 EE Ee et Os eH 14 Dals.>iBathymetryvand Navigation tests 10 Say se ee NEA RO ceeds 14 Drslesl 1992 and 995) SurveyPActivityseess.- meee cee seco: 16 BMP LOO Trandal99 SeSurviey VACVity ens s..2.22-cchaeee eos ces cose cee 16 213 Bathymetric’ Data Collections... 2e: 29 sees eee sce oes sees I) 2.1.4 Bathymetric! DatavProcessingeies.........cc0seeet es or "WINDOW" OF PRISM AGAINST SURFACE TO BE PHOTOGRAPHED DISTILLED WATER INSIDE PRISM 2.IMAGE REFLECTS OFF 45° <— MIRROR Figure 2-3. Schematic diagram of Benthos, Inc. Model 3731 REMOTS® sediment-profile camera and sequence of operation on deployment. Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 24 The sediment grain size major mode values are visually estimated from the REMOTS® photographs by overlaying a grain size comparator that is at the same scale. For REMOTS® analysis, sediment grain size major mode is expressed in phi units. This measurement represents the dominant grain size in the entire frame (field of view) and may not distinguish layers of coarser or finer material. However, the results presented in this report for 1992 and 1997 explicitly record distinct layers separately from major mode. A grain size scale for sediments has been provided in Table 2-3, to allow easy conversion between phi units, millimeters, and standard sieve sizes. The REMOTS sediment profile camera consists of an optical prism, which penetrates the bottom under a static driving force imparted by its own weight. The penetration depth into the bottom depends on the force exerted by the optical prism and the bearing strength of the sediment. If the weight of the camera prism is held constant, the change in penetration depth over a surveyed site will reflect changes in geotechnical properties of the bottom. In this sense, the camera prism acts as a static-load penetrometer. The depth of penetration of the optical prism into the bottom can be a useful parameter, because dredged and capped materials often will have different shear strengths and bearing capacities. Small-scale surface boundary roughness is the amount of surface relief at the sediment-water interface, and is calculated by measuring the vertical distance between the high and low points of the interface in each sediment-profile photograph. Boundary roughness can be categorized as biological, physical, or indeterminate. Biological disturbances, typically the result of macrofaunal activity, usually result in only a small increase is boundary roughness (<1 cm). A mature and undisturbed benthic environment tends to have biological boundary roughness. Physical disturbances can be anthropogenic in origin (for example, by bottom trawling or dredged material disposal) or attributed to natural processes such as wave and current motion. The Apparent Redox Potential Discontinuity (RPD) depth is the boundary between oxygenated sediment and the underlying hypoxic or anoxic sediment. The RPD depth is a sensitive indicator of the biological mixing depth, infaunal successional status, and within- station patchiness (Revelas et al. 1987). The RPD is determined by measuring the thickness of the high reflectance sediment layer at the sediment-water interface formed by light-colored oxygenated or oxidized sediment. : Successional stage mapping is based upon the hypothesis that organism-sediment interactions follow a predictable successional sequence after a major seafloor disturbance (Rhoads and Germano 1986). A disturbance can be any type of event that induces seafloor Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 25 Table 2-3 Grain Size Scales for Sediments ASTM (Unified) Classification’ | __U.S.Std. Sieve’ [| _‘Sizeinmm __—'|_—S~Phi@) Size__| Wentworth Classification’ Boulder Boulder 12 in 300 mm) Large Cobble Cobble Small Cobble 3 in (75mm) Very Large Pebble Coarse Gravel 3/4 in (19 mm) : Hi Large Pebble Medium Pebble Fine Gravel 2.5 3 3.5 4 (4.75 mm) % 5 Small Pebble 5 x f 6 5 : e Coarse Sand 7 8 10 (2.0 mm) Granule Very Coarse Sand Medium Sand Coarse Sand Medium Sand Fine Sand Fine Sand Very Fine Sand Fine-grained Soil: Clay if PI > 4 and plot of PI vs. LL is on or above "A" line” Silt if PI < 4 and plot of PI vs. LL is below "A" line’ Coarse Silt Medium Silt Fine Silt Very Fine Silt Coarse Cla Medium Cla: Fine Clay x and the presence of organic matter does not influence LL. 1. ASTM Standard D 2487-92. This is the ASTM version of the Unified Soil Classification System. Both systems are similar (from ASTM (1993)). 2. Note that British Standard, French, and German DIN mesh sizes and classifications are different. 3. Wentworth sizes (in inches) cited in Krumbein and Sloss (1963). Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 26 erosion, changes seafloor chemistry, or causes major reorganization of the resident benthos. These perturbations can be natural events (i.e., strong currents or a passing storm) or anthropogenic events (i.e., dredged material disposal or power plant effluent). Pioneering assemblages (Stage I) usually consist of dense aggregations of near- surface living, tube-dwelling polychaetes. These organisms begin to populate a sediment deposit within days of a benthic disturbance, as they readily exploit the competition free space. Due to their limited interaction with the sediment, these organisms are usually associated with a shallow RPD. In more stable environments Stage I assemblages are replaced by infaunal deposit feeders or larger tube dwellers (Stage II). Typical Stage II organisms in Long Island Sound include shallow-dwelling bivalves and tubicolous amphipods. In general, tubicolous amphipods are common in eastern Long Island Sound. The presence of dense aggregations of these amphipods (Ampelisca sp.) in the area surrounding NLDS has been identified as a cyclical phenomenon as the spring-summer and over-winter populations mature, reproduce, and decline. As a result, the timing of the individual REMOTS® surveys over the years have documented the amphipod populations in eastern Long Island Sound during different stages of the life cycle. Stage III biota represent a high-order successional stage and are usually associated with areas of seafloor that is not usually subject to surface disturbances. Stage III assemblages (infaunal invertebrates) are typically head-down deposit feeders whose feeding behavior usually results in distinctive subsurface voids. The foraging activities of Stage III organisms are capable of introducing oxygen-rich bottom water to the sediment at depths approaching 10-20 cm below the sediment-water interface. As a result, the bioturbational activity of Stage III organisms tends to cause the deepening of the RPD. A multi-parameter REMOTS® Organism-Sediment Index (OSI) has been constructed to characterize habitat quality (Table 2-4). Habitat quality is defined relative to two end-member standards. The lowest value is given to those sediments which have low or no dissolved oxygen in the overlying bottom water, very shallow RPD depth, no apparent macrofaunal life, and methane gas present in the sediment. The REMOTS® OSI value for such a condition is minus 10 (-10). At the other end of the scale, an aerobic bottom with a deep RPD, evidence of a mature macrofaunal assemblage, and no apparent methane gas bubbles at depth will have a OSI value of plus 11 (+11). OSI values of +6 or less are indicative of chronically stressed benthic habitats and/or those that have experienced recent disturbance (i.e., erosion, sediment transport, dredged material disposal, hypoxia, intense demersal predator foraging, etc.; Rhoads and Germano 1982). Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 27 Table 2-4 Calculation of REMOTS® Organism Sediment Index Value A. CHOOSE ONE VALUE: Mean RPD Depth Index Value 0.00 cm > 0-0.75 cm 0.75 - 1.50 cm 1.51 - 2.25 cm 2.26 - 3.00 cm Sl +375). Gi > 3.75 cm B. CHOOSE ONE VALUE: Successional Stage Index Value Azoic Stage I Stage I ® II Stage II Stage II ® I Stage III Stage I on III Stage II on Ill C. CHOOSE ONE OR BOTH IF APPROPRIATE: Chemical Parameters Index Value Methane Present -2 No/Low Dissolved Oxygen** -4 REMOTS® ORGANISM-SEDIMENT INDEX = Total of above subset indices (A+B+C) RANGE: -10- +11 ** Note: This is not based on a Winkler or polarigraphic electrode measurement. It is based on the imaged evidence of reduced, low reflectance (i.e., high oxygen demand) sediment at the sediment-water interface. Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 2.2.1 NL-91 and the Dow/Stonington (D/S) Mound Complex The NL-91 and D/S Mound complex was developed as part of a dredged material capping project during the 1991-92 disposal season. These mounds were first monitored using REMOTS® sediment-profile photography in August 1992. Three replicate photographs were collected at each of 41 REMOTS® stations radially distributed around the NDA-91-2 buoy position (Figure 2-4A; Table 2-4). The name of each station in Figure 2-4 represents its distance (in meters) from the center (CTR) station. Many of these stations extend out to historic disposal mounds placed during the last three decades. Follow-on surveys (1995, 1997, and 1998) focused primarily on the D/S sediment deposit. As a result, the survey grid was modified to evaluate the recovery of the capped mound. A cross-shaped, 13-station REMOTS® grid was established over the capped mound and centered at the D/S buoy position (41°16.160' N, 72°04.470' W; NAD 27; Figure 2-4B). Once again, three replicate photographs were obtained at each REMOTS® station. This smaller, 13-station REMOTS® grid was re-occupied in 1997 and 1998, replicating the August 1995 monitoring activity. The change in positioning systems and horizontal control (NAD 27 to NAD 83) resulted in a change in the units of the survey center (41° 16.168’ N 72° 04.439° W; NAD 83; Table 2-4). However, there was no alteration of the REMOTS® survey grid relative to seafloor features and operations performed in previous years, only a change in the reported coordinate system (Figure 2-4B). 2.2.2 USCGA Mound The USCGA mound was first examined using sediment-profile photography in August 1995. A 13-station, cross-shaped grid, with a southeast extension, centered at 41°16.480' N, 72°04.290' W (NAD 27) was established over the USCGA mound (Figure 2-5; Table 2-5). Due to the findings of the August 1995 effort, no follow-on surveys were conducted in 1997 or 1998. 2.2.3 NL-94 Mound The NL-94 mound was subjected to detailed investigation using REMOTS® sediment-profile photography in August 1995 and September 1997. A 15-station, modified radial grid centered on the NDA-94-1 buoy position (41°16.240' N, 72°04.890' W; NAD 27) was established over the NL-94 mound. The REMOTS® stations extended up to 150 m Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 29 M.289'¥0 22 | N.891'91 ol P M.++9'0 ocZ | N.29b'9b obt M.+ES'VO 22 | N.8OL'9b ob NM ..0vS'¥0 ocd | N.2OL'OL oP M.+80'%0 22 | N.891'91 ob P M.Olb PO 2 | N.Z9L'9b ob P M.€S+'70 o22 | N.891'91 obt M.Z8L'0 eZ | N.Z9b'9b ob t M ..¥22'00 cL | N.891'91 ol v NM .6€¢'v0 oc M.€SZ'v0 ocZ | N.29L9b ob bv N .89¢'90 oc2 M .962'~0 22 | N.891'91 obP N.891'9) ob? M .SZE'v0 cL | N.Z9} 9b ob b N.Z9L 9b obb M.L9€'¥0 22 | N.891'91 ol P 2661 M .96€'¥0 ZL | N.Z91L 9b ob v S66L M.6E¢'¥0 cL | N.090'91 obP punow s/a M.89¢'v0 oc | N.¥S0'9b ob PD punow s/a M .6Ev'P0 cL | N.PLL OL oP M .89¢'V0 ocZ | N.801'9b obP M.6E¢'¥0 Ll | N.OEE'9L obP M .89¢'v0 o2Z | N.PZE9Ob bb M.6€'70 cL | N.OL2 91 ob t M .89¢'P0 022 | N.OLZ'9b obb M .6€P'v0 cL | N.227'91 obP M.89¥'P0 ocZ | N.OLZ 9b obt M.68E'v0 ocZ | N.891'91 LY ; M.89¢'70 cL | N.Z9L 9b bv 4 epmrbuoy | epmney cc | [ eemueuor | epnmer cies |e £80VN 8661-2661 M.?6S'¥0 ocL M.8S'00 oc M.v82'00 22 M.2b2 00 o@ M.4b79'P0 022 M.699'0 0&2 M.66S'~0 022 M,8?S'P0 oc M.26¢'°90 022 M.26t'V0 022 M,26'P0 22 M.26¢°0 022 M.26b°P0 022 M,L6¢'P0 ocL M.09€'b0 cL M.88€'P0 cL M.SLP'P0 ocL M.€6b'¥0 022 M.¢v2'v0 022 M.S62'V0 o2L M.SE'V0 oL M.96€'P0 oc M.Leb'0 oc M.00b'P0 eZ M.991b'¥0 cL M.£€2'00 of N.890'V0 ocL M.6EL'V0 cL M.bbe'P0 of M.282'00 o2L M.SE'V0 o2L M.92¢'v0 ocL M.£€Z'P0 oc M.662'¥0 o2L M.69€'V0 o2L M2090 o2L M.26b'90 022 M.L6P'P0 oL M.269'V0 cL M.26¢'v0 022 N.26¢'v0 ocL N.2Z€'91 ol D MNO02 N.682'91 ob? MNOOL N. 19291 ob? MO0v N,}92'9b ob MOO0E N. 19291 ol? MO00Zz N,192'9b ol MOOL N.VLL Ob ob P Mso0z N.ZbZ'9b ol ¥ MSOOL N,926'S} ob P $009 N.086'S} ob? soos N.PEO'9L ob? soor N.880'91 ob? Sooe N.ZPL OL ob PB $002 N. 26191 ob PB SOOL N,L00'9L ob? 3ssoos N.}S0°91 ob? 3Sso0ov N. LOLOL ob? BSsooe N.1ZO'9L ob? 3S009 N,690'91} ob? 3S00s N.860'91 ob? 3So0r N.QEL OL ob P BSooe N.VLE OL ob PD 38002 N.Zb2'9b ob PD 3So0r N.9Z1 QL ol? 3$3009 N.ZPL OL ob? 3s3009 N.891 91 ob P 3S300¢ N.FSZ'OL ob? 3009 N.}S2°91 ob v 300s N. b92'9b ob? 300¢ N.}S2'9b ob 300e N.FS2'Ob ob P 3002 N.LS2'9b ob? 3001 N.ECE'OL ol P AN300¢ N.ELE Ob ob v SN300€ N.2Z€'91 ol? SN00Z N,682'91 ob B SNOOL N.29v'91 ob PB Noor N.ELP'OL ob v NOOe N.6S€'91 ob v Nooz N,S0E'9t ob? N.LSZ'9OL ob D = Phe) spmmbuoy | epmney | vonas | cay | LZZQVN ZZQVN | S66L Z66L N.L6¥'¥0 02L N.LSZ'OL oP 2661 xe\duo9 punow S/d +6-1N -Z661 ported oy} 100 xefduioD punoy] $/q PUe 16-IN 94} 38 SUOTEIG SudUES gS LOWA JO SeyeUIp.100+5 S-¢ 91GB L Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 30 1992 REMOTS® Sediment-Profile Photography Sampling Grid 41° 16.750°N Bathymetric Survey Area S) AMOS Disposal Site) Boundary ty 41° 16.500°N 41° 16.250°N 41° 16.000° 41° 15.750°N 72° 05.250° W 72° 05.000° W 72° 04.750°W 72° 04.500°W 72° 04.250°W 72° 04.000° W NLDS NAD 27 a Om 200m 400m Figure 2-4A. Distribution of the 1992 REMOTS® sediment-profile photography stations (41) over the NL-91 and D/S mound complex, relative to the DAMOS disposal site boundary and the US Navy submarine corridor Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 31 1995, 1997, and 1998 REMOTS® Sediment-Profile Photography Sampling Grid 41° 16.750°N GER -DA Bathymetric Survey Area al ‘ MOS Disposal Site Boundary 41° 16.500°N ubmarine Cor) Ss a ( | i 41° 16.250°N NCI WON CAR, QOE qQ0E age sqne coe mk N Nr a a Biss Awe 41° 16.000°N 41° 15.750°N 72° 05.250°W72° 05.000°W72° 04.750°W7/2° 04.500°W72° 04.250°W72° 04.000°W NLDS Ey a7 Om 200m 400m Figure 2-4B. Distribution of 1995, 1997, and 1998 REMOTS® sediment-profile photography stations (13) over the NL-91 and D/S mound complex, relative to disposal site boundary and the US Navy submarine corridor Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 32 1995 REMOTS® Sediment-Profile Photography Sampling Grid USCGA Mound 41° 16.500°N 7 41° 16.250°N Figure 2-5. Distribution of 1995 REMOTS® sediment-profile photography stations (13) over the USCGA mound, relative to the detectable margins of the mound Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 from the center of the capped mound (Figure 2-6; Table 2-6A). The 1997 field effort reported the survey center as 41° 16.244” N 72° 04.864° W in NAD 83. The 15-station, radial pattern was re-occupied in September 1997 to allow comparisons between the data sets (Table 2-6). 2.2.4 Northern Region Due to the northerly shift in the surveyed NLDS boundaries in 1996, baseline characterization of the sediments within the region north of the NL-Relic mound was required. In September 1997, REMOTS® data were collected over the Northern Region to evaluate the benthic habitat conditions within the sediments before they received any further direct deposition of dredged material (this region received material prior to DAMOS monitoring). In order to cover the 0.685 km? area of seafloor efficiently, a total of 11 stations were occupied along two parallel, east-west trending lines. Five stations, spaced 410 m apart, were established along the northern line (latitude 41° 16.779° N; NAD 83) while the southern line (latitude 41° 16.633° N; NAD 83) was composed of six stations, spaced at 350 m intervals (Figure 2-7; Table 2-7). 2.2.5 NLDS Reference Areas Data from three reference areas (NLON REF, NE REF, and WEST REF) are used for comparison of ambient eastern Long Island Sound sediments relative to the material deposited at NLDS through disposal operations. These three established reference areas are often sampled as part of sediment chemistry and benthic habitat surveys at NLDS. From 1992 through 1998, the NLDS reference areas were sampled as part of the sediment- profile photography surveys of the various project mounds within the disposal site. In 1992, three 13-station REMOTS® grids were occupied at the NLDS reference areas: W-REF, NE-REF, and NLON-REF (Figure 2-8; Table 2-8). The REMOTS® sampling grids over the NLDS reference areas formed a cross-shaped pattern with a center station and three additional stations along each of four arms spaced at 100 m intervals. The surveys over NLON REF, NE REF, and WEST REF were centered at 41°16.660' N, 72°02.000' W, 41°16.680' N, 72°03.400' W, and 41°16.200' N, 72°06.000' W (NAD 27) respectively. In 1995 and subsequent surveys, the sampling rationale at the NLDS reference areas changed somewhat, as a random sampling pattern was introduced (Figure 2-8). Four to six stations were randomly selected within a 300 meter radius of the center of each reference area. A total of fifteen REMOTS® stations (STA) were sampled at NLON REF, NE REF, and WEST REF in 1995. NLON REF was sampled at four randomly selected stations. Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 34 Table 2-6 USCGA Mound REMOTS® Stations Coordinates 1995 | NAD27 [Area | Station | Latitude | Longitude Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 41° 16.468" 41° 16.495" 41° 16.522° 41° 16.441" 41° 16.414° USCGA 41° 16.387" 1995 41° 16.468" 41° 16.468° N 41° 16.468" 72° 04.297° W 41° 16.468" 41° 16.449° 41° 16.430° 41° 16.468" 41° 16.468" C55 C5 CS C4 CS TS CBS ECS, SS 72° 04.297" 72° 04.297" 72° 04.297" 72° 04.297" 72° 04.297" 72° 04.297" 12° 04.261° 72° 04.225° 72° 04.190" 12° 04.272° 72° 04.246" 72° 04.333" 72° 04.369" SStStzzzezz22228&= M .696°70 .cZ M.¥v6'V0 cL M.816°V0 2 M .S96°00 .c2 M.vv6'v0 cl M.816°90 cL M_.€68°V0 .cZ M.LZb8°V0 cL M.év8'v0 cL M .898°00 .c2 M.1Lé8°V0 oc M..¢v8'00 oc M .898°70 oc M.£68'00 oc M_.€68°70 oc [apne | aprane| | wonens [sag] e80VN N .G62'91 oP N 92291 bY N.2S¢°91 bY N .8€2 91 LY N 00291 Lv N 61291 bY N .vpe9Ol ov N 2819) obv N 90291 bv N.S¢2?9l oY N.vve Ol bv N .c82°9L obY N.€92°91 bv N.b20°91 ob N.vve9l bt M _.V98'70 cL N.vp2 Ob bv Z661 v6-1N M .696°70 .c2 M.vbv6'00 2 M.816'0 2 M .S96'V0 .c2 M.vb6'v0 C2 M.816°V0 cL M .€68°v0 ocL M.21L8°0 2 M.cv8'v0 cL M .898'~0 oc M.+28°v0 2 M .cv8'p0 cL M .898°70 oc NM .€68'90 cL M .€68°70 cL N .S6¢'91 bY N 92291 obv N .2S¢°9L obV N .8€¢'9L bP N.00¢°91 oP N 61291 bv N.bLC OL obP N.-LSL OL OY N .002'91 oP N.6L¢91 bP N .8€¢°91 LY N 92291 bP N.2S2°91 obv N.G92'9L OLY N .8€2'91 oP SdJBUIP1OOZ SUOTIEIS gS LOWAY punoy -6IN L-C AGL M .€68'00 ocL N .8€2 9b bv S661 v6-IN spmiBuet | _apminey | Wore | wang ZcQVN S661 Vv Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 36 North Region Table 2-8 New London Disposal Site Northern Region REMOTS® Stations Coordinates 1997 [Area | Station | Latitude | Longitude 41° 16.633” 41° 16.779" 41° 16.633" 41° 16.779" 41° 16.633" 41° 16.779" 41° 16.633 41° 16.779" 41° 16.633" 41° 16.779" 41° 16.6337 NLDS 1997 Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 72° 03.945" 72° 03.988" 72° 04.196" 72° 04.282° 72° 04.446" 72° 04.576" 72° 04.697° 72° 04.869" 72° 04.948" 72° 05.162” 72° 05.198" Fh ea 202 ed, 2d FB e2 FD FA Fe SfStetete2e222228&= 41° 16.400° N-> 41° 16.300° N-+ ST, NL-94 Mound 1995 & 1997 REMOTS® Sediment-Profile Photography Station Locations Wie / BACs SA KOON Acoustically Detectable __ 400NW) 400NE “NL-94 Mound / Ty Rey Ze v= QO \ 41° 16.200° NI / 41° 16.100° N4\ \ ¢ Figure 2-6. 72° 05.000° W 72° 04.900°W 72° 04.800 W 72° 04.700 W 72° 04.600° W NLDS NAD 27 a Om 100 m 200 m Distribution of 1995 and 1997 REMOTS® sediment-profile photography stations (13) over the NL-94 mound, relative to the detectable margins of the mound Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 38 1997 REMOTS® Sediment-Profile Photography Station Locations over September 1997 Bathymetery 41° 16.800° Nj _Northern Region 41° 16.600° N | _/museeuic * 41° 16.400° N USCGAINL ‘TR 72° 05.300° W 72° 04.900° W 72° 04.500° W 72° 041 00° W Figure 2-7. Distribution of 1997 REMOTS® sediment-profile photography stations (11) over the Northern Region, relative to the FPEIS disposal site boundary and historic disposal mounds Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 39 1992, 1995, 1997, and 1998 Reference Area REMOTS® Sediment-Profile Photography Sampling Grids 41° 17.000’ N Ver NLON REF NE REF 300 m radius 41° 16.500° N o< 1992 Survey Grid 41° 16.000° N PEIS Boundary \Boundary. See 41° 15.500" N4 connecticut Figure 2-8. Location of the NLDS reference areas and distribution 1992 reference area REMOTS® sediment-profile photography stations (39), relative to the NLDS site boundaries and New York-Connecticut State Line Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 40 WEST REF was sampled at six randomly selected stations (STAS falling outside the 300 m sampling radius). NE REF was sampled at five randomly selected stations (STA1 falling outside the 300 m sampling radius; Table 2-8). The random sampling protocol continued for the 1997 and 1998 field efforts with NLON REF (41°16.666° N, 72° 01.971° W) and WEST REF (41° 16.206” N, 72° 05.971” W) each being sampled at four randomly selected stations. NE REF (41° 16.6867 N, 72° 03.371°W) was sampled at five randomly selected stations. However, the center coordinates and target station locations were reported in the horizontal control of NAD 83 (Figure 2-8; Table 2-8). 2.3. Dissolved Oxygen Sampling All dissolved oxygen (DO) sampling activities were conducted 8 and 9 August 1992 and included CTD casts and Niskin bottle water sampling. Profiles were completed at one station over the D/S mound (200 SW) and one station at each of the three reference areas (Figure 2-9). In addition, surface and near-bottom water samples were collected at each DO Station and subjected to Winkler titration to verify the CTD values. A Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc., Model SBE 19-01 CTD equipped with a centrifugal pump and a SBE 13 Dissolved Oxygen Sensor was used to collect water column and near bottom water quality data (temp, salinity, pressure, density, dissolved oxygen concentrations). The CTD was allowed to equilibrate in ambient surface water for two minutes before performing a cast. The descent rate was controlled to yield sufficient data for each 1 meter horizon within the water column. As the CTD probe approached the bottom, the unit was allowed to rest approximately 1 meter above the seafloor for a period of one or more minutes before beginning the ascent. Upon retrieval from the water, data was downloaded to a Toshiba® 3200T personal computer for analysis. Water samples were taken simultaneously with the CTD DO profile. A pair of 5- liter Niskin bottles were tripped one meter below the air-water interface and one meter above the sediment-water interface. A 300 ml subsample was taken from each Niskin bottle, preserved, and titrated within twelve hours using the modified Winkler titration (Strickland and Parsons 1972; Parsons et al. 1984). During routine quality assurance review of the data, it was determined that the dissolved oxygen sensor on the CTD was experiencing a malfunction that resulted in erroneous readings. Therefore, only the Winkler titration DO determinations are presented in this report. The measurements obtained over two days during the August 1992 survey provide a very limited, “snapshot” view of dissolved oxygen conditions within the disposal site and Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 NEW LONDON 1992 A. Station Location | Station Designations DO Dissolved Oxygen Station 7% 5 ® | 400N a 300N 200N A 200NW 200NE A 100N SOOEN 1OONW a he A, fe __ 41°16.25'N 400W soow 200W 100W cTR 100E 200E 300E 100SW 100SE | 100S A 200SW 200SE A € DO A 400ESE IS A SOOESE 300SE A. 7 N A... 300SSE 400SE ) Meters 300 A A, we 400SSE A... i A 600SE 41°16,00'N A, SOOSSE S (Note: Reference Areas Are Not To Scale) Figure 2-9. Locations selected for water column (CTD) profiles, as well as near surface and near bottom water samples for dissolved oxygen concentrations during the August 1992 field operations Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 42 at the reference areas. Continuous monitoring over the course of several weeks or months was determined to be much more useful for interpreting possible correlations between bottom-water DO concentrations and benthic habitat quality. By examining the longer- term trends in bottom water DO concentrations, conclusions related to any degradation over time or irregularities in benthic recolonization at NLDS could be based on localized (dredged material related) or regional (seasonal hypoxia) effects. The Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection (CTDEP) sponsors a comprehensive DO monitoring program within Long Island Sound. Water quality data are collected from 18 stations on a bi-weekly basis throughout the year. As summer approaches and hypoxic conditions begin to impact Long Island Sound, the program intensifies its sampling efforts by incorporating a total of 48 stations. These data were made available to the DAMOS Program for the 1995 and subsequent surveys to document the trends in bottom-water DO concentrations and evaluate REMOTS® sediment-profile photography results relative to this information. Therefore, DAMOS did not conduct its own DO monitoring at the site after 1992. Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 M.St2'90 22 M.€¢1°90 cL M.220'90 oe M.S82'S0 o22 M.2S8°S0 .c2 M,826'S0 oc M.000'90 .22 M,000'90 .22 M,000'90 .22 M.000'90 oc M,.000'90 .22 M,000'90 oc M.000'90 oc M,S+9'€0 ocd M.€¢S'€0 oe M.2Zb'€0 oe M.SBL'€0 22 M.2S2'€0 0&2 M.82€'€0 022 M.00b'€0 022 M.O0b'€0 022 M.00¢'€0 o22 M.00b'€0 oc M.00b'€0 .22 M.00b'€0 o22 M.€90°90 22 | N.€81 9! ott 9 LVLS M.€96'90 .c2 | N.€81 91 obb Silvis M.00¢'€0 oc M.68'SO ocd | N.ZZ1'91 oth | EL LWLS M.+26'S0 .22 M.910°90 22 | N.ELZ9L ob Pv LVLS M.000'90 oc M,Sb2'20 02 M.826'S0 22 | N.00Z9! ob | Zt 1VLS N.902'91 ob b M.¥91'90 22 | N.SSL9L oP € 1VLS N,00¢°91 ob PY M.€¢1'20 cL M.+S8°SO eZ | N.LEE9t oe | LE LVLS L661 M.068'S0 .cZ | N.8S2'91 oth c'1VLS S661 M.220°20 o22 M.S@6'SO .cZ_| N.80Z 9! oy | Ol LIS 43uY LSSM M.¥S0'90 2 | N.ELZ9! ob bLVLS 43uY LSSM M.S82'40 o2Z M.¥S2'€0 2 | N.SZ9'9I ob | 6 LVIS M.v¥2'€0 cL | N.OEL9L ob | SG 1VLS M.2S8°10 22 M.PPS'E0 cL | N.€69°9I bb | 8 LVIS N.+2€°€0 ocZ M.062'€0 2 | N.ZLZ 91 obb | b'LVLS NM.00P'€0 .c2 M.826'10 oc M.O9€'€0 22 | N.S9L'91 ob | LLVLS N.989°91 obY M .60¢'€0 22 | N.2S99l ob | ELVIS N.089°91 ov M.000°20 oc M .€2€'€0 .c2 | N.P89'9l oh | 9 LVIS 2661 M.¥98'€0 2 | N.Z69°91 oth | 2 LVLS S66L M,000'20 .2Z M.£be'€0 22 M .8€8°20 oc N.€99'91 obb N.29S°91 obb S‘1VLS bv LVLS d3u SN N.+26°10 022 M ..00'€0 oc M .810°20 o22 N.189°91 obb N 62291 obb b1VLS bv LVLS 43uY 3N M,000'Z0 22 M.000'ZO .22 M.000°20 o22 M.S68'10 .%2 | N.S69'91 bb | © LVLS N.999'91 ol M.966'10 22 | N.4S9°91 bb | ELVIS N,099°91 bb M.000'ZO .22 M .9b0'2Z0 22 | N.89S°91 bh | 2 1V1S 2661 M.201'20 22 | N.LES9L ob @'1V1S S661 M.000°20 oc M.£96'10.c2 | N.202 91 .bb | | iVIS jay NOIN M_.266'10 22 | N.Z99°91 ob b1V1S 43Y NOIN M.000°20 .22 N.002'91 ob N.002°91 obb N.002'91 oP N.002°91 ob b N,002'9} obP N,002'91 ob b N.8€0'91 obP N.Z60'91 ob N.OPE OL OFP N.Z9€°91 ob P N.80€'91 oP N.pS2'9! obb N.002'91 ob N.089°91 ob P N.089'91 oth N.089°91 bP N.089'91 oLb N.089°91 ob P N.089°91 obb N.81S'9L obP N.22S°9} ob Ph N.929°91 obb N. 289 ob Ph N.882°91 obb N.PEZ Ol oP N.089'9} ob N.099°91 oLb N.099°9} obP N,099'91 obP N.099°91 oP N.099°91 obP N.099°91 obP N.86¢'91 oth N.2SS°91 ob N,909°9} ob P N.228'9} obb N.892'91 olb N-PLZ OL obb N.099°91 ob M,.000'90 22 N.002'91 obP c66L dau LSSM M.00¢'€0 oc N.089°91 oLb c66L d3uY SN MOOE Mo0e MOOL 300€ 3002 300b Sooe $002 Sool Nooe Nooz NoO-L = BRS) M.000°20 oc N.099'91 obP c66L 43yY NOIN esaVvNn ZZQVN L661 S9jJVUIP100Z SUOTIIEIS gS LOWAU S¥aIY 99U9.19J2Y SQ’IN 6-C P92 L spnnbuey [emer [wong | eay | | eenntuoy | epmnei | uones | eery | | epriguoi | epmney__| ones | _eoy LcQVN Z66L Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 44 3.0 RESULTS 3.1 D/S and NL-91 Disposal Mounds 3.1.1 Bathymetry The August 1992 precision bathymetric survey showed a minimum depth of 13.0 m over the NL-Relic mound to the north and a maximum depth of 23.5 m along the southern edge of the survey area (Figure 3-1). Ata contour interval of 0.25 m, the seven inactive disposal mounds located within the New London Disposal Site (NL-RELIC, NL-I, NL-II, NL-III, NL-85, NL-88, and NL-TR) were clearly defined. The August 1992 bathymetric survey was performed following the placement of capping dredged material (CDM) associated with the Dow/Stonington project. A comparison of this survey with the baseline survey of June 1991 (conducted prior to any placement of either UDM or CDM) resulted in detection of an irregularly shaped mound approximately 500 m in diameter (Figure 3-2). The depth difference plot revealed a mound complex with four distinct peaks. Two of the larger peaks, with heights of 0.7 m and 0.5 m, corresponded to the placement of the D/S and NDA buoys (NDA-91-1 and NDA-91-2) . The NL-91 and D/S mound complex is composed of 8,800 m? of material deposited at the NDA buoy from 26 September 1991 to 22 January 1992. The other two peaks, approximately 250 m east-northeast of the D/S buoy, had mound heights of 0.5 m and 0.4 m. These mounds were developed over the southwestern flank of the historic NL- III mound, and spread into the slightly deeper areas between the NL-III and NL-85 mounds. They were connected to the western lobe of the NL-91 and D/S mound complex by a narrow ridge of dredged material. In December 1991, a bathymetric survey was performed for the Dow Chemical Company by Ocean Surveys Incorporated, Old Saybrook, CT. This “precap” survey, conducted following the placement of UDM but before the placement of CDM, covered a 940 m X 840 m area centered on the D/S buoy (Figure 3-3). By incorporating this precap survey into the existing SAIC data set, a mound development time-series was produced. This time-series data set provided a perspective on the placement of material and resulting changes in bathymetry. The Ocean Surveys Incorporated bathymetry data were re-gridded to a 500 m X 670 m area along with SAIC's June 1991 and August 1992 bathymetric surveys to focus the depth difference analysis. Close examination of the June 1991 bathymetry showed a relatively flat area with no major topographic features capable of influencing the distribution or spread of material within the immediate vicinity of the disposal points Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 August 1992 Bathymetric Survey 41° 16.500°N 41° 16.250°N 41° 16.000 72° 05.000W 72°04.750W 72°04500W 72°04.250W 72° 04.000 W Buoy Positions NDA-91-1 26 Sept - 27 Nov 1991 Depth in meters NDA-91-2 27 Nov 1991 - 22 Jan 1992 NAD 27 NDA-91-3 22 Jan - 10 Apr 1992 NDA-91-4 10 Apr - 1 June 1992 a Om 200m 400m D/S 27 Nov 1991 - 15 Jan 1992 (missing) Figure 3-1. Bathymetric contour plot of the 1600 m x 1600 m survey area over the New London Disposal Site, August 1992. A 0.25 m contour interval shows current and relic disposal mounds Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 46 Depth Difference August 1992 vs. August 1991 Bathymetry Total Accumulation of Dredged Material over the NL91 and Dow/Stonington Disposal Mounds 41° 16.500°N 41° 16.250'N 74 41° 16.000°N NDA-91-1 26 Sept - 27 Nov 1991 NDA-91-2 27 Nov 1991 - 22 Jan 1992 NDA-91-3 22 Jan - 10 Apr 1992 NDA-91-4 10 Apr - 1 June 1992 Mound Height in meters NAD 27 ——— Om 200m 400m | D/S 27 Nov 1991 ¢ 15 Jan 1992 (missing) Figure 3-2. Bathymetric contour plot of depth differences between the June 1991 and August 1992 surveys in the vicinity of the Dow/Stonington mound, complete with plotted positions of the 1991-1992 disposal buoys, 0.1 m contour interval, depth in meters Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 47 Ocean Surveys, Inc. December 1991 Bathymetry 41° 16.300° N 41° 16.200° N 41° 16.100° N 41° 16.000° N 72° 04.600° W 72° 04.500° W 72° 04.400°W 72° 04.300° W 72° 04.200° W NLDS Depth in meters NAD 27 ki ~=— oC aa) Om 100 m 200 m Figure 3-3. Bathymetric contour plot of the 940 m x 840 m survey conducted at the New London Disposal Site by Ocean Surveys Incorporated in December 1991, 0.5 m contour interval Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 — 1998 48 (Figure 3-4). Depth difference calculations between SAIC's June 1991 and OSI's December 1991 surveys showed the accumulation of dredged material to a thickness of 1.0 m around the D/S and NDA buoy locations (Figure 3-5; Appendix A1). According to the DAMOS disposal logs, the Gwen Mor Marina and Port Niantic material was repeatedly deposited south and east of the NDA #1 and #2 buoy locations. The majority of Dow Chemical Company and Stonington Harbor UDM was reportedly disposed on the eastern side of the D/S buoy, consistent with the depth difference plot. The smaller mounds (0.4 to 0.8 m high) to the east of the larger deposit probably represent Gwen Mor Marina and Port Niantic dredged material released while the NDA #1 buoy was off-station, due to contact with a U.S. Navy submarine. Comparisons were then made between the re-gridded August 1992 postcap bathymetric survey performed by SAIC (Figure 3-6) and Ocean Survey Incorporated’s December 1991 precap survey. The depth difference calculations showed the buildup of CDM to a maximum thickness of 0.8 m approximately 350 m to the east of the D/S buoy, with increases in depth of CDM up to 20-40 cm throughout the survey area (Figure 3-7). It appears much of the CDM dredged from the Dow Chemical Company's Allyns Point facility was actually released somewhat east of the UDM deposit (Figure 3-8). As a result, the final, irregularly shaped bottom feature was formed by the coalescing of three sediment deposits (NDA suitable material, D/S UDM, and D/S CDM; Figure 3-9). Detailed analysis of the 1995 and 1997 bathymetric surveys showed no significant difference in the size or shape of the NL-91 and D/S mound complex since 1992. Given the low profile of the capped mound as detected in August 1992, large-scale consolidation of the sediment deposit was not anticipated. 3.1.2 REMOTS® Sediment-Profile Photography In the August 1992 sediment-profile photography survey over the NL-91 and D/S mound complex, 41 stations were occupied to examine surface sediment composition, document benthic recolonization, and delineate the aerial extent of the disposal mound apron. Follow-on surveys in August 1995, September 1997, and July 1998 consisted of a truncated 13-station grid to facilitate long-term monitoring. A complete set of REMOTS® image analysis results for these four surveys is presented in Appendix B; the survey results are summarized below. Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 49 SAIC June 1991 Bathymetry Area of Concentrated Analysis over the Dow/Stonington Disposal Mound 41° 16.300° N 41° 16.200° N 41° 16.100° N 72° 04.600°W 72°04.500°W 72° 04.400°W 72°04.300°W 72° 04.200° W LDS Corrected to MLW Depth in meters NAD 27 Ti Om 100m 200 m Figure 3-4. Bathymetric contour plot of the June 1991 survey conducted by SAIC, re- gridded to a 500 m x 670 m analysis area, 0.5 m contour interval, depth in meters Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 Depth Difference SAIC June 1991 vs. Ocean Surveys, Inc. December 1991 Bathymetry 41° 16.300° N Gwen Mor Marina Port Niantic, Inc 41° 16.200° N aie own of Stonington Cont 41° 16.100° N 72° 04.600° W 72° 04.500°W 72°04.400°W 72°04.300° W 72° 04.200° W NLDS Mound Height in meters NAD 27 I Las Om 100 m 200 m Figure 3-5. Bathymetric contour plot of the depth differences between the SAIC June 1991 and OSI December 1991 surveys showing accumulation of dredged material at the precap stage of development, 0.2 m contour interval Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 51 SAIC August 1992 Bathymetry Area of Concentrated Analysis over the Dow/Stonington Disposal Mound 41° 16.300" 41° 16.200° 41° 16.100° 72° 04.600° W 72°04.500 W 72°04.398° W 72° 04.3027) W 72° 04.200° W DS Corrected to MLW Depth in meters NAD 27 a S| Om 100 m 200 m Figure 3-6. Bathymetric contour plot of the August 1992 survey conducted by SAIC, re- gridded to a 500 m x 670 m analysis area, 0.5 m contour interval, depth in meters Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 Depth Difference SAIC August 1992 vs. Ocean Surveys Inc. December 1991 Bathymetry 41° 16.300° N 41° 16.200° N 41° 16.100° N 72° 04.602. W 72° 04.500°W 72°04.398°W 72° 04.3027 W 72° 04.200° W NLDS Mound Height in meters NAD 27 EE Om 100m 200 m Figure 3-7. Bathymetric contour plot of the depth differences between the SAIC August 1992 and OSI December 1991 surveys showing accumulation of CDM at the postcap stage of development, 0.2 m contour interval Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 53 Sediment Deposits Composing the NL-91 and D/S Mounds (Survey 41° 16.300°N ‘Arti ct 41° 16.200°N vn of Stonington\— | sw Chemical Co. vi 41° 16.100°N i‘ 72° 04.600W 72°04.500W 72°04.400W 72°04.300W 72° 04.200 W DM thickness in meters NAD 27 Figure 3-8. Depth difference comparison displaying the sediment deposits formed during the 1991-92 disposal season. Gray shading represents sediment placed prior to mid-December 1991. Yellow shading represents sediment deposited from mid- December to mid-January 1992. It is likely that many of the smaller areas of apparent accumulation surrounding the central deposit are the result of survey artifacts and are considered artificial. Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 SAIC August 1992 vs. SAIC June 1991 Bathymetry Total Accumulation of Dredged Material over the Dow/Stonington Disposal Mound NL-Il] 41° 16.300°N Su rvey Artifact 41° 16.200°N 41° 16.100°N 72° 04.600°W 72°04.500;W 72°04.400W 72°04.300W 72° 04.200W NLDS Mound Height in meters NAD 27 S| Om 100m 200 m Figure 3-9. Bathymetric contour plot of the depth difference between the SAIC August 1992 and SAIC June 1991 surveys showing total accumulation of dredged material within the 500 m x 670 m analysis area, 0.2 m contour interval Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 55 3.1.2.1 August 1992 Survey REMOTS® photographs detected recently deposited dredged material extending 400 m south, and 500 m southeast of the survey center (Figure 3-10). The majority of the material deposited in close proximity to the D/S buoy was composed of black silty sand with a varying silt-clay fraction. Dredged material layers with chaotic sedimentary fabrics, anomalous grain size distributions, and low optical reflectance were presumed to be recently deposited or “fresh” (1991-1992 disposal season) dredged material. Boundaries for the distribution of the fresh dredged material were determined by mapping the spread of the darker NDA-91 and D/S material relative to the lighter and biologically re-worked, historic dredged material of the inactive NL-III, NL-88, and NL-85 mounds (Figure 3-11). Differentiation between unsuitable dredged material and cap material through REMOTS® photography was difficult due to the similar lithology of the Dow Chemical sediments. However, a layer of high optical reflectance fine sand originating from the material deposited at the NDA-91 buoy was visible at stations extending to 100 m north, 400 m south, 400 m west, and 500 m east of the survey center (Figure 3-12). The depth of the overlying sand varied from 1.27 cm to 7.03 cm at stations 100N and the grid center, respectively. At peripheral portions of the survey, there was a noticeable lack of fine sand at stations 300SE through 500SE and all the ESE stations, as well as stations 200N, 400N, 500S, 5OOSSE, 600E, 200NE, and 100NE (Figure 3-10). The sediment profiles of these stations consisted of thin layers of reworked dredged material over black silt (Figure 3-13). The majority of REMOTS® survey stations had layers of fresh or historic dredged material thicker than the penetrating depth of the REMOTS® camera. The detection of ambient sediments was not anticipated based upon the location of the REMOTS® grid relative to the historic NLDS disposal mounds. The major modal grain size over the disposal site ranged from granule/coarse sand (-1.0 phi) to very fine silt and clay sized particles (phi sizes >4; Figure 3-14). The coarsest sediment, consisting of very coarse and coarse sands, was located at the survey center, and stations within 300 m south and 100 m east (Table 3-1). As expected, REMOTS® camera prism penetration depth was lowest at those stations with a surface sediment layer consisting of coarser grained sands, granules, and shell. Silt-clay (>4 phi) was the dominant grain size major mode at 17 of the 41 REMOTSS® stations occupied. These stations typically showed a distinct stratigraphy in which a surface layer of medium and fine sand (1-2 phi) was overlying very fine silts and clay (24 phi; Figure 3-14). The most frequently observed sediment was very fine sand Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 56 ‘(uBis< ayy Aq payesipu}) sseuy9)4) JeAe] jeuayewW PaBpasp jo ajew)jse wWnwiu|wW e s} UMOYS eNnjeA UeESW ey) UAL) ‘Sa}ed|\daJ OAY 1829] je uj ydep UoNenaued Wsud ay) papasoxe jevajew paBpaup J] “uONe)s yoea ye pazAjeue pue poujeyqo seBew} a}e0)\de) E=u Jo) SUeAW ase UMOYS SAN|eA ,. 1 e6aS ii eBe)S 1 8621S NO II aBe1S i e6e1S NO 1 eBeISs <- | a6e1S 1 a6eIs 1a6eSs i 621g NO | 8Be1S 1aBbeis I e6e1S NO 11 e6e1S assoos 9s900S 8SS00P 9S300P7 8S00r SO00r u00y eUa00F 800F Orme tnon L30NI 1 abeS 1 eBeys 1eBeis I 28e)g NO | aBe1S I 86e)S NO | eBeIS |aBeis 1) 62S 1 abeS 11 8621S 1 abeIs I aBeIg NO | eBeis i Bas IL 2621S NO 11 eBeISs I aBels NO | aBeIs i a6e1S NO | eBeIS i e6e1S NO 1 aBe\s }aBbeis |aBeis @Ssooe 8SO0E SOOE U00e auagoe NK NMMNN (wo) — ueew (iy) ssouyBnoy | uejpewiso | ueeWISO |ePoW Jofew Auepunog 3 azjs ujeI weasald aBeys yseyB}H ena pabpeg ueew sseuyojy. pera u0}}e907 Boly Ju im sdoy /punow jeuojsseoons TOnenarN leyayew peBpag esoweg AVAING ZGGT 24} LOZ ArCUMUING synsoy AYdeasojoY_ a1Jo1g-JUIUIIPIS gS LOWAY Xedwo0D punoy] S/q pue 16-IN T-€ dB : ng Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 itor. Mon 57 Sediment Composition as detected with REMOTS® Sediment-Profile Photography 41° 16.500°N 41° 16.250°N SS \ ~~ ‘ ir pad. Lhe eh \ / {~~ SRB / Sa Cee \ eh \ Su . SS Zon ON SUL OS Survey Attitact a 41° 16.000'N 72 05.000°W 72°04.750W 72°04.500W 72°04.250°W 72° 04.000 W Sediment Composition FS - Fine Sand MS - Medium Sand CS - Coarse Sand SSt - Sandy Silt BSt - Black Silt Disposal Buoy Location Material Figure 3-10. Distribution map of surface sediment type over fresh and/or historic dredged material in the vicinity of the new NL-91 and D/S mound at NLDS Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 58 Extent of Disposal Mound Aprons Based on REMOTS® Sediment-Profile Photography == = Cen eee) a oes Survey oe WW ( : = ia dy ya) cay ZZ NOS \ oa ; mem Ne Wit jf eS) Ty >) We es U 41° 16.500°N A _NRELIC (0g) A 41° 16.250'N+3; Zz aN \~4 =~ 4 ~~ = A 4 ~~ \ ° Ya NS 41° 16.000°N : ie ~~ Recently Bepositéd ss ges see eas nei —, S\ Ne yy : \ \ SYR WSN LLL = SF OE Survey beitect 72° 05.000°'W 3=72°04.750W 72°04.500W 72°04.250W 72° 04.000°;W Figure 3-11. Countour lines based on sediment stratigraphy as detected with REMOTS® sediment-profile photography Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 [eLloyeul pospolp Ysodj JoA0 Jae] pues ev Sunsidap SQQz UOTIEIS Jo Ydeisojoyd @SLOWAY ‘TI-€ WANs wo0r wo0z wo — M.000'0 ZZ M.0S2'P0 o22 M.005'P0 .22 M.0S2'P0 022 NM.000'S0 o%2 AL0SZ'S0 ZL .OS2'Sb obb ‘NLOOO'SL bP N.0S2'9b ob¥ Pld Gurjdwes AydesBoyoud 2]4014-JUaUIPeS @S.LONSY Z66L Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 60 [elLioyeW pospoip Ysod] JOAO [eLIoleW posposp poyxlomal AT[eorBojorg Jo Joey e SuNoidep Fsooe uoneis Jo ydeisojoyd @SLOWANA “EI-€ ens WO0b wo0Z WoO — | N.000'F0 wel N.0SZ'b0 o22 M.00S'P0 o22 MOSZ'V0 022 M.000'S0 22 AL0S2'S0 2 OSZ'SL ol¥ .000'9b bv N.O92'9L obP N.008°91 ol? N.O9Z'9b ob? Aa\r)\ Pus) Burjdwies Aydes60j;0Ud a|jOJq-JUSWIPSS @S.LOWAY Z6S/ Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 61 Major Modal Grain Size as detected with REMOTS® Sediment-Profile Photography ——— = Z = ‘ = \ 4.. W ea ; ~~ Revehtly DF ——Bretiged Ntatérial (Black SiIty\ \_/ ee 41° 16.000°N Disposal Buoy Location A Major Modal Grain Size (phi) Figure 3-14. Spatial distribution of major modal grain size for the 1992 REMOTS® sediment-profile photography stations over the NL-91 and D/S mound complex Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 62 (3-4 phi), with many replicate images displaying small pebbles and recently dredged shells within a sandy matrix. These sediments were found extending out to 400 m west, 500 m east and south, and 200 m southwest of the NL-91 center. Isolated pockets of fine sand were found 300 m north, as well as 600 m south and 600 m southeast (Figure 3-14). Station 400S, lying on a relatively steep bathymetric slope, displayed evidence of a harder bottom with shell, pebble, and hydrozoan growth at the sediment water interface (Figure 3- 5). Within NLDS, mean boundary roughness values ranged from 0.4 cm to 3.1 cm. Two stations on the mound flanks, 1|OONW and 100SE, showed the highest roughness values of 2.6 cm and 3.1 cm (Table 3-1). Seventy-eight percent of the stations at the disposal site were classified as having a biological boundary roughness, while 22 percent had a physical boundary roughness. Ninety-four percent of the reference stations had a biological boundary roughness while six percent were physical in nature. The mean apparent RPD depths at NLDS ranged from 0.3 cm at Stations 5OOSE and 600ESE to 3.7 cm at Station 200NW with a majority (33%) of stations exhibiting RPD depths within the 1.5 to 2.0 cm range (Figure 3-16; Table 3-1). No evidence of a redox rebound layer (recent reduction in the depth of oxidized sediments) was detected in any REMOTS® image collected during the 1992 survey over the NL-91 and D/S mound complex. In general, the area surrounding the D/S mound showed strong signs of benthic community recovery with a diverse population of Stages I, II, and III assemblages (Figure 3-17). Twenty-five of the forty-one stations sampled displayed some combination of Stage I, Il, or III assemblages (Table 3-1). Eight stations displayed healthy Stage I populations progressing to Stage II. Stage II was denoted by the presence of distinct tubes of the amphipod Ampelisca sp. at the sediment surface (Figure 3-18). Three stations (7%) exhibited Stage II individuals colonizing the surface sediment while Stage III assemblages were actively feeding in the layers below the sediment-water interface. Finally, six stations had representatives from all three end-member assemblages present in the REMOTS® photographs. Eight stations (20%), including the survey center, had Stage I individuals inhabiting the sediments over a population of Stage III organisms (Figure 3-17). Apparently, by occupying the sub-surface sediment layers, Stage III individuals (deposit feeders) were able to survive a modest disposal event and migrate up through the thin layer (0.2 m to 0.3 m) of newly deposited sediment. Fifteen of the remaining REMOTS® stations sampled possessed an exclusive population of Stage I (27%) or Stage II (10%) individuals. Exclusive Stage I populations were found at eleven stations. Stations 200 m south and Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 [eloyeul pasporp payxJoMal J9AO [Jays pue s[qqed jo s1oAey Be BuNIdap SOO UOHeIS Jo ydessojoyd @SLOWAU ‘ST-€ dns woop wodz wo — | N.000'V0 22 N00SZ'P0 22 NL00S'P0 ZZ A.OSZ'P0 oZZ M.000'S0 022 M.0SZ2'S0 22 OSZ'SL obl¥ ~ (UES Hoe} uae peipwd pars odag Af 000'SL ob? N.OS2'9b ob N.005°S/ oL¥ N.O9Z'9b ob rAa\)\ pu Burjdwies AydesBoyoug 3]401q4-}UEWIPSS @SLOWSY Z661 Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 64 Apparent RPD Depth as detected with REMOTS® Sediment-Profile Photography / eo a Ve a Su rvey A antige = 41° 16.500°N 44° 16.250°N+- |) \) i /,) i Oe Wf Vay l( on wt “Breck silt) < GZ W/ HS 41° 16.000°'N=~ \AWAAS / \ f SS / Bud, a 4 5 em J ~: Le ecently Deposit = ——P ee Nas SS lec ksit = \\ a Overall average Ac” 0 ( 1.29, S { St -Su rvey Artifact _ assed ] 72° 05.000°W 72°04.750W 72°04.500W 72°04.250W 72° 04.000 W e Disposal Buoy Location A RPD Figure 3-16. Spatial distribution of Redox Potential Discontinuity depths for the 1992 REMOTS8® stations on the disposal mound Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 65 Successional Stage as detected with REMOTS® Sediment-Profile Photography L So C @ AR sy ( we \ 2 — Survey rAritaet \\ \ Va \ ) EX WN 41° 16.500°N if S Ar / \ RAW SA. ee ~~ h aati in tt ame 41° 16.250/N4+< | ak re Hd ps attra: } tin hh = < SSS s| is IN 8 aoe CALE a at LAW TM 41° 16.000°N 72° 05.000W 72°04.750W 72°04.500W 72°04.250;W 72° 04.000°W @ Disposal Buoy Location Successional Stage Figure 3-17. Spatial distribution map of successional stage status for the NL-91 and D/S mound complex Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 [elia}eW pospoip Yysoy SuIzIUO]ODeI ‘ds vosyadup podiydure Burjjamp -2qn} 94} JO SuNsIsuod AWIUNWIWOD TJ a3e1g AyTeoy ev SuNDIdep |FSoog uoneIS Jo ydeisoj}0ud @SLOWAU ‘SI-¢ ens wO0pv wode wo — os | N.000'0 022 M.052'H0 o22 M.005'P0 02 M.0SZ'P0 22 M.000'S0 022 M.0S2'S0 ZL -000°91 ob N.OSZ'9} ob N.008°9} Lv S GAL Ss Iv ae LCOYN PUD Buryjdureg AydesBojoyd 3]yO1q-JUBWIPES @S.LOWSY 266} N.OSZ'9L obP Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 67 200 m, 300 m, and 400 m southeast of the survey center were inhabited solely by Stage II assemblages. One station (300W) produced no benthic infauna data due to shallow camera penetration depths. Because of the diversity in benthic infaunal recolonization status of the disposal mound and the widespread presence of Stage II organisms, the overall successional stage of the disposal mound can be characterized as a solid Stage II population advancing to Stage III. Based in part on the relatively advanced successional status and moderate RPD depths, the median OSI values over the disposal site ranged from +2.0 to +8.0 (Figure 3- 19; Table 3-1). The higher OSI values were found on the perimeter of the REMOTS® sampling grid and were randomly distributed. No methane or low DO conditions were observed in any of the replicate images. __ See 222 August 1995 Survey The August 1995 REMOTS® sediment-profile survey at the NL-91 and D/S mound complex was used to map the aerial extent of dredged material and determine benthic recolonization levels relative to the 1992 findings. The REMOTS® sampling grid occupied in 1995 was reduced to a modified 13-station cross grid and shifted south-southeast relative to the 1992 grid (Figures 2-4A and 2-4B). The center point was based on the D/S buoy position, and station placement was designed to cover the two lobate sections of the NL-91 and D/S mound complex. Recently deposited dredged material was detected in nine of the thirteen REMOTS® sediment-profile stations across the NL-91 and D/S mound complex. Dredged material thickness was greater than camera penetration along the east-west transect, as well as at stations 100S and 100N (Figure 3-20). The surface sediments at Stations 300N, 200N, 100W, and 200S appear to have been reworked significantly since 1992, losing the typical characteristics of recently deposited sediments. As a result, these stations were classified as being composed of historic dredged material. The average penetration depths ranged from 4.5 cm to 15.1 cm. The stations with the shallowest camera penetration (< 10 cm) displayed sediment with a higher sand component. Most of the stations with camera penetration greater than 10 cm had dredged material greater than penetration. The major modal grain size at eight of thirteen stations over the NL-91 and D/S mound complex was classified as 4 to 3 phi (very fine sand; Table 3-2). Three stations (100E, 400E, and 300N) were composed entirely of fine-grained sediments (>4 phi; silt/clay). The two stations with coarser grained sediment were 200W (3 to 2 phi, fine sand) and 200S (<-1 phi, granules and pebbles; Figure 3-21). A stratigraphic pattern consisting of a surface layer of very fine sand overlaying mud at depth was observed at all stations except 100W, 100N, Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 ive) ‘o ‘(uBis< ay) Aq payeoipul) ssauyoiu) JaAe] jeleyew pabpap jo ayewijsa wWNwiuILW e S| UMOYS aNjeA UBB By) Ud) ‘Sayeo!|des ony }sea] je ul ydap uo}ejoued WslJd ey) papesoxe jejeje pabpaip J] "uoNe}s yoRe ye pazAjeue pue pauleyqo sebew! a}eo1\de1 g=u 10} SUeaW O1e UMOUS San|e/ ,. ‘uonesjaued uey) Ja}e916 aq 0} paullUJajap pue sabew! 9}ed!\de1 Bey) JO QUO UI pa}Oa}Ep jeleyeW pebpaig , i NO ll Ls il! NO 1s il! NO ll 1s ll NO ll 1s ll NO il LS i NO ll Ls it NO ll 4S i NO ll LS it NO 1s NO Ls i! NO Wt 1s il! NO ll 4s ll NO I Ls (wo) (1ud) uea uelpayy apon ssauyBnoy| Iso Jofey yuasald abejs yS@yBIH Asepunog aZIS UleI5 jUuaSald sabes jeuoissaoons (wi) ueai UO}eIJBUBd elaweyg uo1}e907 S/d 8 L6-1N S/d 8 +6-1N S$/G 8 L6-1N S/d 8 L6-1N S/d 8 L6-1N S/d 8 L6-1N S/G 8 L6-1N $/G 8 L6-1N $/ 8 L6-1N S/G 8 L6-1N S/d 8 L6-1N $/ 8 L6-1N $/G8 16-1N ealy ‘Jey /punow AIAING SEG 24} 10J AteUTUING syNsoy AYydeisoj0Yg IJO1g-JUIUNPIS oS LOWAY X2e[du0d punoy] $/q pue 16-IN CE NGL Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 69 OSI values as calculated from 1992 REMOTS® Images \. SSeS Saye nract a Fae at a a y) / 41° 16.500°N 41° 16.250°'N-+ . AEE si \ Se ~ Recefitlhy Deposi ited -—~_\ ~~ Dretiged Material — Ta ee Silt) 72° 05.000°W 72°04.750W 72°04.500°W 72°04.250°W 72° 04.000°W Disposal Buoy Location A Os! Figure 3-19. Distribution map of Organism Sediment Index (OSI) values over the NL-91 and D/S mound complex as detected in the August 1992 REMOTS® sediment-profile photography survey Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 70 1991 vs. 1992 Depth Difference Mean Dredged Material Thickness as detected by REMOTS® Sediment-Profile Photography 41° 16.4007 41° 16.300'N 41° 16.200'N 41° 16.100° Recently Deposited Dredged Material (Black Silt) AL? AGOGO RS ee Rd Nett cre coe te keen ob 72° 04.600°W 72° 04500°W 72° 04 400°W 72° 04.300'°W 72° 04.200;W 72° 04.100'W NLDS Mound Height in meters NAD 27 a Om 100m 200m ncm - Mean Dredged Material thickness CP - DM thickness > REMOTS® Camera Penetration Figure 3-20. Mean dredged material thickness at 1995 REMOTS® sediment-profile photography stations over the NL-91 and D/S mound complex, relative to the August 1992 detectable margins Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 71 jelioyeul poSpeip poyxlomel JOAO [Jays pue s[qqod Jo Jade] v SuNoIdap SOOT UOHRIS Jo ydessojoyd @SLOWAY “1Z-€ MANSY woop wode wo — M.000'V0 .cZ MLOSZ'P0 22 M.00S'P0 o22 M.OSZY0 022 M.000'S0 ZL M.0S2'S0 o2L N.OSZ’SL ob Tae N.000°91 ob¥ NLOG2'Sb obv N.008'91 obv a) | eC ee ra NLOSZ'9L obP Pug Burjdwes AydesBoyouyd 3]'jOJd-JUSWIP|S @SLOIWSY 866} Pue ‘2661 ‘S66L Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 72 200N, and 300N, where the layer of sand may have been incorporated into the sediment or was obscured by decaying amphipod tube mats. The range of replicate-averaged boundary roughness values over the 1995 REMOTS® stations ranged from 0.7 cm to 4.8 cm, with the highest values at 200S (4.8 cm) caused by the presence of pebbles and shell lag (Table 3-2). Boundary roughness in the majority of the replicate images that were analyzed was less than 2 cm and often attributed to biogenic activity. Replicate averaged RPD values over the NL-91 and D/S mound complex ranged from nearly 1.0 cm to 3.5 cm, with an overall average of 2.2 cm (Figure 3-22; Table 3-2). The shallowest RPDs were concentrated along the southern (100S, 200S) and eastern (100E, 300E, — 400E, 500E) legs of the sample grid. The center station (CTR) displayed a relatively deep RPD of 3.0 cm, however, Station 300N demonstrated the deepest replicate averaged RPD value of 3.48 cm. The presence of an RPD rebound layer was noted at several stations (CTR, 100S, 100E, 200E, 300E, 400E, and 500E). This rebound layer is the result of the RPD becoming shallower within the surface sediment several days to weeks before the REMOTS® sediment- profile photography survey. The reduction in RPD depth is often related to a decrease in bottom water DO concentrations, in association with a seasonal increase in oxygen demand (biological and chemical) within the surface sediments. Stage III benthic communities were observed in at least one replicate photograph from all REMOTS® stations over the NL-91 and D/S mound complex. The dominant biological assemblage was Stage II on III as the August 1995 survey results indicated by the presence of decaying or disturbed amphipod tube mats (Figure 3-23A). At Stations 300E, 300N, and 400E one or two replicates contained only evidence of Stage II organisms (amphipods). Stage I on III was noted in replicate images from stations nearer the center of the mound (100E) and historic dredged material off the disposal mound (200N, 100W, 200S; Figures 3-23B and 3-24). Organism Sediment Index values at the NL-91 and D/S mound complex ranged ‘from +6 to +10, with an overall average of +8.0 (Figure 3-22; Table 3-2). The lowest OSI value (+6) was calculated for Station 400E primarily due to a shallow RPD depth in one replicate image, although the area surrounding 400E is still considered quite healthy. The highest OSI of +10 was generated for Station 200E, reflecting a Stage II on III successional stage and deep RPD depths in all three replicate images. There was no visible evidence of low apparent DO levels in the sediment at any of the stations, although methane gas bubbles were observed in one replicate image at Station 100S. Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 1991 vs. 1992 Depth Difference 1995 RPD and OSI values 41° 16.400°N 41° 16.300°N 41° 16.200°N SS ik hoy \\, Ms 1.86 QO0E d 49 300) gat 500EA £4 Hb V A ee 8 \ XS Ss ew] ) 41° 16.100°N Recently Deposited Dredged Material (Black Silt) 72° 04.600°W 72° 04.500°W 72° 04.400°W 72° 04.300°;W 72° 04.200°W 72° 04.100 W RPD Station A OSI Mound Height in meters NAD 27 Om 100m 200m Figure 3-22. Spatial distribution of mean redox potential discontinuity depths over the NL-91 and D/S mound complex as detected by the 1995 REMOTS® sediment-profile photography survey, relative to the 1992 detectable margins of the mound Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 74 pod Tube Mat. Stage Il) } U fi ( \ Amph oF CTC ® ® LL ‘ ie 4m (B) Figure 3-23. REMOTS photographs showing Stage II on Stage III at (A) CTR and Stage I on III at (B) 200N on the (A) D/S mound Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 75 1991 vs. 1992 Depth Difference Successional Stage 41° 16.400°N 41° 16.300°N 41° 16.200'N x 200A 100WA_ CYR AO” ZOE 2008 A 400E A, | ee 1 M4 1, uu @) Oo p | i 500E A Hl, Ul Sand | ' even 41° 16.100'N lack silt = Recently Deposited Dredged Material (Black Silt) 41° 16.000'N- SY Cea) -Gucron ena a sane 72 04.600°W 72° 04.500°W 72°04.400°W 72° 04.300°W 72° 04.200°W 72° 04.100 W ‘StationA NLDS Successional Stage Mound Height in meters ee eS i NAD 27 a Om 100m_200m_ Figure 3-24. Spatial distribution map of successional stage status for the August 1995 REMOTS® sediment-profile photography stations occupied over the NL-91 and D/S mound complex, relative to the detectable margins of the mound Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 76 Sae23 September 1997 Survey In September 1997, a second follow-up REMOTS® sediment profile photography survey was conducted to document the continued benthic recovery over the NL-91 and D/S mound complex. Station locations were based on the same modified 13-station grid occupied in August 1995 (Figure 2-4B). Recent and/or historic dredged material was both detected and greater than the penetration of the camera prism in all replicates, with averaged thickness ranging from 6.8 to 18.2 cm (overall average of 14.2 cm). The replicate-averaged mean camera penetration over the mound was somewhat deeper than the previous survey. As a result, the images displayed more layering of material relative to the 1995 survey, with fine sand over reworked dredged material, over fine organic silt at several stations (Figure 3-25A). As in previous years, fine to very fine sand characterized the sediment over the NL- 91 and D/S mound complex (Table 3-3). The major modal grain size was 4 to 3 phi (very fine sand) in most photographs, with a mix of silt-clay in nine of the 42 images. Station 200W displayed medium-grained sand (2 phi), along with shell fragments and remnants of decaying amphipod tube mats (Figure 3-25B). Surface sand overlying fine-grained sediment (sand-over-mud stratigraphy) was noted at every station over the disposal mound. Granule and pebble sized grains were noted at the sediment-water interface in multiple replicates collected at Stations 100S and 200S (Figure 3-26A & B). The replicate-averaged boundary roughness values ranged from 0.6 to 2.2 cm (Table 3-3). In contrast to samples collected in 1995, boundary roughness was primarily attributed to physical forces, although some surface disturbances were indeterminant or caused by biogenic activity. Evidence of physical disturbance of the surface included abundant disturbed amphipod tube mats, surface scour, and shell lag deposits. Individual replicates at Stations 200N (a) and 300N (b and c) showed evidence of winnowing of fines at the sediment surface. The replicate-averaged apparent RPD ranged from 1.0 to 6.7 cm (4.47 average; Figure 3-27). Stations 200E, 400E, and 300N had a visible redox rebound layer ranging from 5 cm to 10 cm below the sediment-water interface, indicating a recent reduction in the RPD depth. The successional status was advanced, showing healthy Stage II or Stage II on III communities inhabiting the sediments of the NL-91 and D/S mound complex (Figure 3-28). Some of the photographs were identified as Stage I to II due to the presence of disturbed and Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 ‘(uBis< ayy Aq payeoipul) ssauyoiu) JaAe| jelayewW pabpoup jo ayewjse wnwiuIW e Ss! UMOYsS anjeA UeAW au; Ud) ‘sayeaI|des OM} yse9] Je ul yep UOejauad Wusid a4) papesoxe jeajew pabpaup J) “uONe}S yoRe ye pazAjeue pue pauleyqo sabew! a}e01\doJ E=U J0j SUBS aJe UMOUS SAN|eA ,, iW NO I Ls wt i S/d 8 L6-1N i NO Ls We i S/d 8 L6-1N NO Wt Ls TT : S/G 8 L6-1N Ls Wi S/O 8 L6-1N NO 1 1S Wl S/O 8 L6-1N i! NO | LS S/G 8 16-1N INO I Ls S/d 8 16-1N it NO Il LS S/G 8 16-1N Ls S/ 8 16-1N WwNO W 4s S/ 2 L6-1N i NO tl LS S/O 8 L6-1N Ww OL Wis S/d 2 16-1N NO | LS S/G.8 L6-1N (wo) uea;, (1yd) juasald IELOVeIN aes (wo) ueay sseuyBbnoy eee apo; sofew eed (5) pebpeigim baghy Aiepunog ISO aZIS UIeIS e6e)s 1S9uBIH jeuoisseoons ueOWN dda sdoy jewajyew eiawes 424 /BUNOW jo saquinn neppeia ADAING L661 24) A0J AreUIUING synsay AYdessoxoY, afljorg-}UIWIPIg @®SLOWAY X2[dwoD punow] S/d pue 16-1N €-€ 2198]. Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 78 AJaAoodsar “IaXkev] SOVjINS OY} Ul pues poUTess-uINIPsUT pue SurLoAdey [elioyeu paSpaip Sunoidep (q) MOOT pue (VY) FOOT suoteIg Woy sodeun @SLOWAY L661 “S7-€ BANS - [eUSTeA pebpeig — poylomay pues oul Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 79 (q) S00z pur (V) SOOT SUOTIEIS xed [BL19}VUI PSxOMa JOAO SoTqqad Jo 19Av] dovJAns eB SutAvTdsIp WIOd PUNOU! ¢/(] PUR 16-"IN 9} Je po}oa|]oo soBeu! @SLOWAA L661 “97-€ aaNsty V WIS 21219 sa]qqed Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 80 NL-91 and D/S Mound Complex 1997 RPD and OSI Values woow’s EAs s 0, S00E A, A -500E 4 a P XN - > ) 9 Sand _ over Black silt Recently Deposited Dredged Material (Black Silt) Overall Average A 8. NLDS Mound Height in meters Figure 3-27. Distribution map of mean RPD (red) and median OSI (blue) values calculated for the 1997 survey over the NL-91 and D/S mound complex, relative to the 1992 disposal mound footprint Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 &1 NL-91 and D/S Mound Complex 1997 Successional Stage WSS ene 200WA 100WA CTR =p HE tp EN AA M 1, UJ W AMA AS ‘Ouay he "l, MS BS i) Sey eS over Black silt > => Recently Deposited Dredged Material (Black Silt) Mound Height in meters _200 m__ Figure 3-28. Distribution map of successional stage calculated for the 1997 survey over the NL-91 and D/S mound complex, relative to the 1992 disposal mound footprint Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 82 decaying amphipod (Ampelisca) tube mats. Stage III organisms were present in 19 of the 42 replicates and represented at all stations except 300N and 200E. The median OSI values ranged from +2 to +11, with an overall average of +8.6 for the entire NL-91 and D/S mound complex (Figure 3-27). The only station displaying a median OSI value of < +6 (indicating continued disturbance) was Station 300N (OSI +2) primarily due to the lack of Stage III organisms and shallow RPD depths. Conditions indicative of low bottom water DO concentrations were observed in sediments at three stations. One or more of the replicate images collected from stations 100E, 300E, and 300N displayed shallow RPD depths and dark, sulfidic sediment located at or near the sediment- water interface, suggesting a recent reduction in available oxygen. However, the presence of Stage III individuals and moderate to deep RPD depths in other replicate images obtained from stations 100E and 300E contributed to high OSI values, +10 and +8, respectively. The highest OSI (+11) was calculated for Stations 100N, 100W, and 200S, reflecting a Stage II on III successional stage and deep RPD depths in all three replicate images collected for each station. 3.1.2.4 July 1998 Survey REMOTS® results from the 1998 survey over the NL-91 and D/S mound complex were used to document the placement of supplemental cap material during the 1997-1998 disposal season. In addition, REMOTS® sediment-profile photography was used to evaluate the benthic recolonization over the center of the disposal mound and continue assessment of the overall recovery of the dredged material deposit. The 13-station sampling grid established in 1995 was reoccupied, and three replicate photographs were collected at each station. Dredged material was detected in layers having a thickness which exceeded the camera prism penetration depth at all stations, with minimum dredged material layer thickness ranging from 6.4 cm to 14.6 cm (overall average of 11.9 cm). Apparent new dredged material was observed over the northern and central areas of the original NL-91 deposit (Figure 3-29). The thickness of new material was measured in the REMOTS® photographs, where fresh material over older deposits was clearly evident (Figure 3-30). The DAMOS Capping model was used to calculate the footprint of the 1997-98 sediment deposit on the NLDS seafloor and forecast where new material would accumulate. Based on reported barge volumes and disposal positions, the model predicted the footprint would consist of two overlapping deposits (represented as circles on Figure 3- 30) with diameters of 400 m (5,650 m3 reported volume) and 300 m (1,200 m3 reported volume). The circles encompass the majority of the REMOTS® sediment-profile Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 & B. D/S CTR A. D/S 100N 15 cm Figure 3-29. Evidence of recently disposed capping dredged material (CDM) over the NL-91 and D/S Mound Complex Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 xo[duiog punoy| S/d pure [6-IN 24} JaA0 suoT}eIs @S LOWAY 22 [eHoyeu MoU JO YJdap “SA JOO]JVAS oY} UO [eLIa}eUI peSposp Mou Jo jULIdjoo} pojoofoid pue suoredo] [esodsip WO 3 ‘O¢-€ 2ANSIT Ww! 00Z wg (japow Buiddes SOW) jWUd}oo) pq Pe}Delo4g C) suoje007 fesodsiq 86-2661 [] (wo) Jevere/\| MON JO Udeq #/ UOREIS @SLOWSY w €8 GVN sJo}ewW ul Ujdeq NM .0S¢°V0 oc N..00S'V0 ocd MN .0S2Z'°V0 .cZ N.001 91 obV N.002°91 ob? N.00€'91 ob? Kaning sujewAujeg 266) Pu jelazey) MON P2}99}0q YIM SUOI}E}S @SLOINAY 8661 suojje007] jesodsiq 86-2661 Z6-L66L PuNo|] Uo}HuIUO}G Mog Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 photography stations that display accumulation of new material. Thin layers of material were observed at two stations falling outside the predicted area of accumulation (Stations 300N and 100S). The presence of this material at these stations suggests a thin layer on the margins of the new deposit spread 25 m to 50 m beyond the radius predicted by the model. The replicate-averaged mean camera penetration at the NL-91 and D/S mound complex ranged from 6.5 to 15.8 cm, with an overall average of 12.4 cm (Table 3-4). As in previous surveys, fine to very fine sand characterized the surface sediments over the mound. The major modal grain size was 4 to 3 phi (very fine sand) in most photographs. Surface sand overlying fine-grained sediment (sand-over-mud stratigraphy) was noted over the majority of the NL-91 and D/S mound complex. Sand, pebbles and hydrozoans were noted once again at Station 200S, consistent with the findings of prior surveys (Figure 3-31). The replicate-averaged boundary roughness values ranged from 1.0 to 3.2 cm, with an average of 1.5 cm (Table 3-4). Boundary roughness was attributed to a combination of physical and biogenic forces. Evidence of physical disturbance and possible winnowing of the surface included abundant disturbed amphipod tube mats, surface scour, and shell lag deposits. The apparent redox potential discontinuity (RPD) was measured on each photograph to determine the depth of penetration of oxygen into the sediment (Figure 3-32; Table 3-4). The replicate-averaged apparent RPD depths over the NL-91 and D/S mound complex ranged from 1.2 to 6.1 cm (3.6 average). No stations over the mound displayed any visible redox rebound layers. The successional status was advanced, showing healthy Stage II or Stage II on III communities inhabiting the sediments of the disposal mound. Some stations showed a slight decline in successional stage relative to data collected in 1997. The reference area showed a similar decline in comparisons between the 1997 and 1998 dataset (Table 3-12). Stage III organisms were present in 15 of the 39 replicates distributed among eight stations (Figure 3-33). The remainder of the July 1998 photographs were classified as Stage I, or Stage I to II if amphipod (Ampelisca) tube mats were present. Median OSI values ranged from +3.0 to +11.0, with an overall average of +7.5 for the NL-91 and D/S mound complex (Figure 3-32; Table 3-4). The only median OSI values of < +6.0 (indicating continued disturbance) occurred at Stations 300E and 400E. The low OSI values were due in part to shallow RPDs, disturbed amphipod tube mats and Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 66 bb se LL OL 8661 661 ssouyBnoy Aiepunog | Ue!P2W ISO ‘(uBis< ay) Aq payedipul) ssauxo}Uj JeAe} jeayeLW pabpasp jo ayewNSe WNWIUJW e S| UMOUS aNjeA UeaW au} uau) ‘sajyeoldas om) 1se9] Je ul Udap UoVesjauad Wsyd ey) papeeoxe jee}eW pabpeup J) ‘uoNe\s yee ye pazAleue pue pauleygo sebew! eyeo)\des E=u Jo) suUeaW ave UMOYS SeNIEA ,, WoL tis INO I 1S Ls WwmeNO Wis ris WeNO I 4s NO I 4s WNO I 4s WmNO Ws WNO I Ls Wis Wis NO Ws 8661 (1ud) NO WLS INO Ls TNO W Ls Ws TNO 11s NO | 1s NO I 1S NO Il LS Ls NO Wels TNO WLS ror wis TNO TLS L661 apo; sofeyy yuasald aBbe}s ysayBiy azig ues by'o< LS°vb< 68 LL< Wl i LBEL< Wi i 9S'6 Wit i St VL< Wn 6E'LL< HS'EL< 8E'8< by'9< LL6< CEELS 6S'LL< LS"bL< PEEL < mn‘ LO'PL< 8661 2661 866l 661 8661 jepayew (wis) paBpaig/m ueaw Gd sday jo Jaquiny yuasald seBejs Jeuojsseoons SAIAING B66] PUL L66[ 94} 10} ArvUIUINS cBOb< Se'Sh< 9G°Lb< LL PL< egSi< b6'9< c8'9< SpSl< 92'Lb< 26'0b< BL bL< cB bL< €2'8L< 2661 +y(W9) ueew SssauyoiyL jeayeyy peBpaig bs'9 ease 42 (wi) uray uo}}e1JaUad eiawieg synsay Aydvssojpoy a[Jo1g-jUEUIPIS @SLOWAA X2{dwuoD punoy] ¢/q pur [6-IN b-€ Fe S/O 8 L6-1N S/O 8 L6-1N S/O 8 +6-1N S/O 8 +6-1N S/G 8 L6-1N S/O 8 16-1N S/O 8 L6-1N S/G 8 L6-1N S/d 8 16-1N S/d 8 L6-1N S/O8 /6-1N S/G 8 16-1N S/O 8 16-1N aly ‘yay /punow Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 ae Bathymetric Survey Area Yor ef : ae ‘ AE Al Toe 35 8 } 87 material Om 200m 400m Figure 3-31. REMOTS® photograph of Station 200S depicting a layer of pebble and shell over reworked dredged Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 88 uoseas [esodsip 96-66] 24) SuLINp poysodap [eLoyeu Mou JO yuLidjooy payorpesd ay} pue yuridjooy punow jesodsip 766] St} 0} SANeTOI ‘xepdwoo punow g/q pue 16-IN Y} J9A0 ADAINS Q6GI OU} OJ poyepnoyeo sonyea (anjq) [SO UeIpow pue (pes) Cady UREU jo dew uonnqgmsiq *7E-¢ aANnsIy W 002 wid (jepow Buidde5 SOW) JUUd}oo _wq pepelolg C) suoij2007 jesodsiq 96-266 [] UOHEIS @SLONSY w €8 GVN sJajaw ul ujdaq N .0S¢'0 oc NM .00S°70 ocd N.0SZ0 o¢Z N.OOL'9L ob? N.00€ OL ob? 2 IBA SDPIOAY, vi / Aaning sujewAipeg 266) pue Jel49}e|] MON P2}99}0q 4}IM SUOI}E}S @SLOWAY 866L suoe07 jesodsiq 86-2661 Z6-L66) Puno Uo}HuIU}G /Moq Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 89 uoseas esodsip 36-2661 OU} SuLINp poysodap jeLayeu Mau JO JWLId\oo} parorpaid oy} pue yuLIdj00j punow jesodsip 766] SY} 0} sAteyar “xepdwo0o pUNOUI S/C PUL [6-IN 9Y} JOAo AdAINS B66] OU} JOF paye[Noyeo o8ejs [euOIssad9Ns Jo dew UOIINGIISIG “EE-E BANSIY W002 wo €8 GVN siajau Ul ujdeq japow Budde SONG) JULc}OO} ING pePelold O} suojeoo] jesodsiq 96-2661 [] | UONEIS @SLOWSY ww | | ( NM ..00S'70 oc M.0SZ°0 cL Y. (Corey Kyjeq) turidjooy y Sunow rete Z6618 ( xa|dwod punou. aN 2 N.002'9} obv N.OO€'9L obv Kaning sujewAujeg 266) pue [ELISE] MON P2}99}9q UPIM SUOREIS @SJOWSY S66) suoje907] jesodsiq 86-2661 Z6- L661 Puno] Uo}Huluojg/moq Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 90 lack of clear evidence of recent Stage III activity. There were no indications of low DO conditions within the surface sediments, and no methane detected. 3.1.3 August 1992 Dissolved Oxygen Measurements Near-bottom (approximately 1 m above the bottom) dissolved oxygen concentrations sampled on 7 August 1992 at the disposal site and the three reference areas ranged from 7.3 mg/L to 7.8 mg/L. Dissolved oxygen concentrations in the top two meters of the water column were slightly higher than those measured in near-bottom waters, ranging from 7.7 mg/L to 8.1 mg/L. The concentrations of dissolved oxygen were uniformly distributed throughout the disposal site and reference areas. These concentrations are not limiting to benthic organisms (Tyson and Pearson 1991). 3.2 USCGA Disposal Mound 3.2.1 Bathymetry The USCGA dredged material disposal mound was formed when 124,000 m? of dredged material from the Eagle Pier project at the U.S. Coast Guard Academy was released at NLDS between the historic NL-TR and NL-RELIC disposal mounds. A 1600 m x 1600 m precision bathymetric survey was conducted in August 1995 to document changes in seafloor topography relative to the survey performed in August 1992 (Figures 3-34 and 3-35). A 0.86 km? area surrounding the USCGA buoy was selected as an area of detailed analysis to facilitate accurate depth difference calculations. The material dredged from the US Coast Guard Academy was sequentially deposited, forming an irregularly shaped sediment mound 420 m wide and 1 m high at the apex (Figure 3-36). There was a 0.5 m high ridge of sediment that extended approximately 320 m southwest from the center of the mound. Another lobe of sediment extended 350 m from the mound center to the north- northeast and was 190 m wide. 3.2.2 REMOTS® Sediment-Profile Photography A 13-station REMOTS® sediment-profile photography survey was completed over the USCGA mound in August 1995 to document the benthic recolonization status. A complete set of REMOTS® image analysis results for the August 1995 survey of the USCGA mound is presented in Appendix B. Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 9] August 1995 Bathymetry 1600 m X 1600 m Survey Area 41° 16.500° N 41° 16.250° N 41° 16.000° N7 72° 05.000° W 72°04.750°W 72°04.500°W 72° 04.250°W 72°04.000° W NLDS Corrected to MLLW Depth in Meters NAD 27 SS | Om 400 m Figure 3-34. Bathymetric chart of the 1600 m < 1600 m survey area, August 1995 results, 0.5 m contour interval Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 Depth Difference August 1992 vs. August 1995 41° 16.500°N 41° 16.250°N 41° 16.000°N 72° 05.000 W 72°04.750W 72°04.500W #£72°04.250°W 72° 04.000°W NLDS Depth in meters Mound Height in meters NAD 27 EE Zz Om 400 m Figure 3-35. Depth difference plot displaying the location of the disposal mounds created since the August 1992 survey (USCGA, NL-94, and NL-92) relative to historic disposal mounds Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 93 Depth Difference 41° 16.600° N: 41° 16.500° N 41° 16.400" 41° 16.300" 41° 16.200" N 72° 04.400° W 72° 04.200° W 72° 04.000° W NLDS USCGA Mound Mound Height in Meters NAD 27 SS Om 400 m Figure 3-36. USCGA mound, depth difference from August 1992 to August 1995, 0.2 m contour interval Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 At ten out of thirteen REMOTS® stations, the dredged material thickness exceeded the camera prism penetration depth in all of the replicate photographs (Table 3-5). Along the southeast stations, dredged material thickness either exceeded prism penetration depth or reached a maximum of 13.24 cm (100SE) and 9.23 cm (SOSE). At Station 150E, dredged material thickness was less than penetration depth and averaged 12.8 cm. The mean prism penetration depths ranged from 12.2 cm to 15.9 cm and averaged 14.0 cm. These values are consistent with the presence of fine-grained material at most of the stations. Most REMOTS® photographs taken at the USCGA mound showed homogeneous silt-clay (>4 phi). Very fine sand (4 to 3 phi) was noted in two replicates at 100S, and at one replicate each at LOOW, 50N, 50S, and CTR. Sand-over-mud layering was noted at all stations. The boundary roughness values for the USCGA mound sediment-profile photographs were low (ranging from 0.6 to 1.6 cm with an average of 1.0 cm), indicating relatively little surface disturbance. Boundary roughness was due to biogenic activity in all but one photograph. In one of the replicate photographs at Station 100E, the boundary roughness was due to the presence of shell lag at the sediment surface. Station-averaged apparent RPD depths ranged from 0.8 cm to 7.6 cm at the USCGA mound (Figure 3-37; Table 3-5). The average RPD value for the mound was 2.69 cm, with no geographic pattern to the distribution of values. The RPD values for two out of three replicate photographs taken at the center station (CTR) were unmeasurable due to camera artifacts. These two photographs were noted as being potentially hypoxic, along with one replicate image at Station 50S and one replicate at Station 100S. A Stage II biological assemblage dominated the USCGA mound. The presence of Stage III organisms (primarily Stage II on III) was noted in three of the replicate images at Station 5OW, two replicates at Stations SOE and 100E, and one replicate at Stations 100SE and 100W (Figure 3-38). Many of the photographs showed dense aggregations of amphipod tubes, or disturbed and decaying tube mats. Due to the presence of Stage II or Stage II on III communities, the USCGA mound at the time of the August 1995 survey appeared to be recovering more rapidly than predicted for recently deposited dredged material (Germano et al. 1994). Median OSI values at USCGA mound REMOTS® stations ranged from +3 to +9, with an overall average of +6.4 (Table 3-5). The lowest OSI was at the CTR station (+3), primarily due to low dissolved oxygen conditions and lack of Stage III organisms, although only one CTR photograph had a measurable OSI due to camera artifacts on the Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 95 ‘(uBis< ay} Aq payeopu!) sseuxo!Uy) JeAe] jeeyeWW peHpaip jo ayewNsa WnwwiuIW e Ss} UMOYS aNnjeA UeaW aU} UBL} ‘Seyeo!|daJ OM) }se9] Je Ul UJdep uonjesjaued wsiid ayy papeedxe jelieyew pebpaup J] ‘uole}s yes ye pazAjeue pue paulejqo sabeu!! ayeo1|\das E=u JO} Sueatu ole UMOUS SaN|e/ ,, (wid) uvayA ssauysnoy Alepunog uvIpayAl Iso Wis il NO W Ls is Wis i LS i NO Wt Ls Wis Wis NO Wis Il! NO I LS i Ls is i NO I LS quasaig ade)}g SOYsIT [ersazey, | (wd) uvayy (wis) pia | aspor ssouyol uva sadvjS Coola PML W u0neI07 HOEeaaIS [Blaze] jUOHVQIUIgG BIQUILD ADAING S66 94) A0J ArvUIUING s}[nNsoy AYdvasoj}oY a1J0.14g-}UIUIIPIg ®SLOWAY VIOSA S-€ 91qRL Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 96 USCGA Mound 1995 RPD and OSI Values 41° 16.600" 41° 16.500’ N SONA 5 5 -88 3 2.48 0. 821.9 ONLY SL Wey sos 39 6 DRS 1008, 41° 16.400’ | 1.57 15084 Acoustically Detectable 41° 16.300° | Margins of the Mound 2.69 Overall Average A 41° 16.200° 6.42 72° 04.400° W 72° 04.200° W 72° 04.000° W RPD Station A OSI Figure 3-37. Distribution map of mean RPD and median OSI values calculated for the 1995 survey over the USCGA Mound Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 97 USCGA Mound 1995 Successional Stage 41° 16.600° N 41° 16.500° N 8% ON ak as WH, tH, ltt a li, he al it de Mee 100S&_ sii, Ill 41° 16.400° N ll ° : Acoustically Detectable 41° 16.300° N Margins of the Mound 41° 16.200° N 72° 04.400° W 72° 04.200° W 72° 04.000° W Station A Successional Stage Figure 3-38. Distribution map of successional stage calculated for the 1995 survey over the USCGA Mound Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 98 other replicates. Two other USCGA stations (150S and 50S) also had evidence of low apparent dissolved oxygen and the absence of Stage III organisms, resulting in lower OSI values. A median value of +5 was derived for Station 150S and +6 was calculated for Station 50S. Sediment methane was noted at one replicate image at Station 50W; however, the presence of Stage III organisms buffered the effect on the OSI for that station. 3.3. NL-94 Disposal Mound 3.3.1 Bathymetry The NL-94 mound was formed when 37,000 m3 of material from the U.S. Navy Submarine Base was released at the NDA 94 buoy. The disposal activity was concentrated around the NDA-94-1 buoy position. As a result, the August 1995 precision bathymetric survey was successful in detecting this small deposit (Figure 3-35). A 0.48 km? area of detailed analysis was selected around the active disposal point to conduct precision depth difference calculations. The deposition of material at the NDA-94-1 buoy resulted in the formation of a disposal mound approximately 125 m wide and 0.9 m high (Figure 3-39). A flat tongue of dredged material with a maximum height of 0.4 m extended 140 m southeast from the apex of the mound. This southeast tongue of the NL-94 mound abutted the historic NL-I mound (Figure 3-35). 3.3.2 REMOTS® Sediment-Profile Photography A series of REMOTS® sediment-profile photographs were collected over the NL-94 mound in August 1995 and September 1997 to document the lateral extent of dredged material within close proximity to the NDA-94-1 disposal buoy position, as well as assess the benthic recolonization status of the surficial sediments. A complete set of REMOTS® image analysis results for the NL-94 mound are presented in Appendix B. Siei45| August 1995 Survey The center station (CTR) and six surrounding stations (all within 50 m of the center) had dredged material, with the thickness of the dredged material layer at each station exceeding the penetration depth of the camera prism. Twelve of the fifteen REMOTS® stations had recently placed dredged material present, while three of the stations had either ambient sediment or historic dredged material. At Stations ISONW, 100SW, and 150SE, one or two of the replicate photographs displayed dredged material layer thickness greater than or equal to the penetration depth of the camera prism. At Stations 15ONW and Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 Depth Difference 41° 16.400° N 41° 16.300" N 41° 16.200° N 41° 16.100° N 72° 05.000° W 72°04.900°W 72°04.800°W 72°04.700° W 72°04.600° W NLDS NL-94 Mound Mound Height in Meters NAD 27 | Om 200 m Figure 3-39. NL-94 mound, depth difference from August 1992 to August 1995, 0.2m contour interval Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 100 100SW, the remaining replicates indicated ambient sediment, while historic dredged material from the NL-I mound was detected at 150SE (Figure 3-40A&B). This resulted in mean dredged material thickness of 2.9 to 5.5 cm for these stations. At 100E, all replicates had dredged material over ambient sediment, for an average thickness of 5.3 cm. Ambient sediment was found in all replicates at stations 100 m west, northwest, and northeast of the center. The mean camera penetration depths for REMOTS® stations at the NL-94 mound ranged from 7.9 cm to 15.6 cm and averaged 11.85 cm. These values are consistent with the presence of fine-grained material at most of the stations (Figure 3-41). The major modal grain size was consistently classified as fine-grained silt-clay (>4 phi) at the stations within 50 m of the center station and at Station 100SE. The remaining station replicates ranged from silt-clay (>4 phi) to very fine sand (3 to 4 phi; Table 3-6). Sand-over-mud layering was observed at the majority of the stations outside a 50 m radius from the center. Average boundary roughness values ranged from 0.6 cm to2.9cm. The distribution of boundary roughness values showed no spatial pattern. With the exception of three stations, boundary roughness over the NL-94 mound was attributed to biogenic activity. One replicate from Station 100E exhibited evidence of a scour lag feature, one replicate from Station 50NE showed a possible erosional boundary, and one replicate at 50NW displayed a shell lag feature. Average RPD values at NL-94 stations ranged from 0.7 cm to 5.1 cm, with an average RPD value of 2.02 cm over the entire mound (Table 3-6). There was no apparent geographic pattern to the distribution of deep and shallow RPD depths (Figure 3-42). The shallowest RPD was measured at 50S (0.7 cm), and the deepest RPD was measured at 5OSE (5.2 cm). Stage II and Stage II on III communities dominated the NL-94 mound. Stations 100NE and 5ONW had Stage I present, as well as Stages II and III (Figure 3-43). Because these are advanced successional stages for an area recently impacted by dredged material, NL-94 appeared to have recovered rapidly relative to the normal progression of benthic recovery (Germano et al. 1994). Median OSI values ranged from +6 to +11 over the NL-94 mound, with an overall average of +7.4 (Table 3-6). In general, an OSI of less than +6 indicates areas of benthic disturbance (Rhoads and Germano 1982). The highest OSI value of +11.0 was detected at Station 5OSE, where there was Stage II on III and a mean RPD thickness of 5.1 cm Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 101 ‘(uBIs< ay} Aq payeoipul) ssouyxoIu) JaAe| jelayeLU pabpaip jo a}ewWNse WNWIUIW e S| UMOYS aNj|eA UeaW ay} UB) ‘sa}ed!|daJ OM) }Sea] Je UI Uap uoljesjQuad Wslid oy) papaaoxe jeli9yewW pabpeup 3] ‘uole}s yoea ye pazAjeue pue paulejqo safe! aye0!|\de1 E=u JO} SUeaW aJe UMOUS San|e/ ,, Ii NO I LS i NO Wt 1s NO Wt Ls Wt NO Il LS NO Wt Ls NO I Ls I NO tl 4s INO I 1s INO Il 1s il! NO ll Ls NO 41s i NO Wt 1s i NO I 4s it NO 1s NO Il Ls (wd) uvayAl ssauysnoy Aaepunog (14d) UBIpay spor quasaig ISO Jofe | adeyg ysaysiy aZIg UleAD Jeltazeyy |(wd) uvayy] (wid) padpaiq | ssauyaiyy uvayAl cOneanry BIIV JOY /M Sday | [elsazey] | uoesjauag /punoy BIIUIED quasaid sadejS [euolssazong ABAING S66T 24} 10J ArvUUING synsay Aydvasojoyd atjo1g-JUaUIpIg @®S LOW ALY 6-IN 9-€ AGB L Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 ~ 1998 AJOATOOdSaL ‘[eLoJeul Pospoip ILIO}STY poyJOMoL pue JUSIUIpes JusIquie SunoIdep (q) ASOST pue (V) AANOST YORE p6-IN Woy poureigo sosewl @SLOWAA “Ov-€ ens Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 Mean Dredged Material Thickness 41° 16.400° N 41° 16.300° N 41° 16.200 N 41° 16.100° N 72° 05.000’ W 72° 04.900°W 72° 04.800° W 72° 04.700°W 72° 04.600° W — ncm- Mean Dredged Material Thickness NLDS : NL-94 Mound CP -DM Thickness > REMOTS® : . : Mound Height in Meters Camera Penetration NAD 27 | Om 200 m Figure 3-41. Mean dredged material thickness at the 1995 REMOTS® sediment-profile photography stations over the NL-94 mound Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 104 NL-94 Mound 1995 RPD and OSI Values 41° 16.400° N 41° 16.300’ N 1 ae 150NW 7 2.48 100NW Ay 2.1 41° 16.200° N Acoustically Detectable Margins of the Mound 2.02 Overall Average A 41° 16.100° N 7.43 72° 05.000° W 72° 04.800° W 72° 04.600° W RPD Station & OSI Figure 3-42. Distribution map of mean RPD and median OSI values calculated for the 1995 survey over the NL-94 Mound Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 105 NL-94 Mound 1995 Successional Stage 41° 16.400° N 41° 16.300° N 41° 16.200° N Acoustically Detectable Margins of the Mound 41° 16.100° N 72° 05.000° W 72° 04.800° W 72° 04.600° W Station & Successional Stage Figure 3-43. Distribution map of successional stage calculated for the 1995 survey over the NL-94 Mound Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 106 (Figure 3-42). One replicate at 5SONE showed evidence of low apparent DO, but no methane was evident in any replicate. BS September 1997 Survey In September 1996, the NDA-96 buoy was deployed approximately 80 m west of the NL-94 mound. A total volume of 3,400 m3 of supplemental cap material was placed over the mound at the buoy, adding to the pre-existing mound (Figures 1-3 and 3-44). In September 1997, 15 stations at the NL-94 mound were sampled with the REMOTS® sediment-profile camera, duplicating the survey conducted in 1995. Three or more replicate images were obtained at each station to document the placement of the new material and monitor benthic recovery. Dredged material was detected in all replicates at all stations. The measured thickness of dredged material ranged from 6.0 to 16.2 cm (> 13.5 cm average; Table 3-10). Dredged material layer thickness was equal to, or exceeded, the camera penetration in all replicates images collected in September 1997. In 1995, dredged material was not detected at stations LOONE, 1OONW, and 100W. Thin layers of dredged material over ambient sediments were noted at Stations 100SE, 100SW, and 1ISONW. The presence of dredged material greater than camera penetration at these stations during the 1997 survey was consistent with the placement of material at the NDA 96 buoy (Figure 3-44). The REMOTS® images characterized the sediment as a mix of fine to very fine sand (3 to 4 phi) with some variability (Table 3-7). As a result, the major modal grain size for the entire mound was 4 to 3 phi (very fine sand) at most stations. Stations 1OONW, 100W, 50NW, and 50SE displayed a finer grain size, with a mix of silt-clay predominating (>4 phi). Coarser-grained sediment consisting of fine to medium sand (2 phi) occurred in at least one replicate at Stations CTR, 5OSW, and 100E. Surface sand overlying fine-grained sediment (sand-over-mud stratigraphy) was noted in 28 of the 46 photographs collected. The boundary roughness values for the NL-94 mound ranged from 0.6 to 4.2 cm, with an average of 1.4 cm (Table 3-7). Shell lag or disturbed amphipod tube mats were visible on the sediment surface within most replicate images. One replicate image at each of Stations 1OONE, 5ONE, and 100SW was identified as winnowed. Armoring of the sediment surface by shell lag (current scouring), visible in the images at Stations 150SE, 50NW, 50S, and 100E, may protect the mound from further current-induced winnowing (Figure 3-45). In contrast to the 1995 survey results, boundary roughness was primarily attributed to physical forces, although some surface disturbances were indeterminate or caused by biogenic activity. Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 107 ‘(uBis< ayy Aq payeoipul) Sseuxo1U} JeAe] JelWe}eW peBpaup jo eyewNjse WuNWIUIW e S| UMOYS eNjeA UBB BU} UAL} ‘Se}ed!I|de OMY ysea] Je ul UJdap UONesjoUed sid ey) papedoxe jeayewW pabpaip J] ‘uOoIe}S YOes ye pazAjeue pue pauleyqgo sebew! ayeo1jdaJ E=u JO} SUBALU Be UMOYS SAN|eA ,, il NO 1 4S Y OL I Ls i NO lt LS iT NO | 4s i OL W Ls Ls NO Il LS i OL W Ls IT NOT 1s Ls I OL We Ls rNO ll LS I NO | Ls 1s is ueay (wid) ueal abeys safes ee ssouyoiy | UO}JeJQUad ae ysoybiy =| jeuolssaoons y jeyayey eiaweg jo Jaquiny pebpeaig (wo) ueayy juasald yuasald ueIpaW ssauyinoy iso Auepunog AVAING £66] 24} 1OF ATLUIUINS s}[Nsoy AYdesSOJOY_ I1O1g-}UIWIPIS @SLOWAY Puno [esodsiq 76-IN L-€ A081 Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 108 uosvas [esodsip / 6-966] OU} SULINp [eLIO}eUI pospoIp YSOJJ POATode1 PRY YOIYM S66] UI SJUOWIpes jUSIquIe ButXeydsip punoul p6-"IN 2U} JOAO suoye}s SUIMOYS (AANOO[) OSeUT o[duexe pue dew sayoidiojuy “pp-¢ aansiy jyusiquiy J9AO IG Yse4 BusAejdsip uoHeIS@SLOWAY fae ar Vv —— SSOUYIIUL ING Pebesaae-ajeo1|\day jeLojeyw Pobpeyae Ww msoor JUSIGQWY J9AO jellajeyy pobpaiq ysei4j jo s.udsald Kaning Aydesboyoud djlJO1g-JUSWIPSS @SLOWSAY L661 Puno 76-1N 8yIS jesodsiq UOpuc] MeN Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 S S ing 150SE (A), SONW (B), and 50S (C) depicting shell armori 10n d from NL-94 Stat ine 3-45. REMOTS® images obta Figure Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 110 The replicate-averaged apparent RPD ranged from 1.8 to 6.2 cm (4.3 cm average), with no apparent spatial pattern (Figure 3-46; Table 3-7). Six stations had a visible redox rebound ranging from 4 to 9 cm, suggesting a recent reduction in RPD depth. Similar to the 1995 data, the successional status was advanced, showing healthy Stage II or Stage II on III communities inhabiting the sediments of the NL-94 mound (Figure 3-47). Some of the photographs were identified as Stage I to II due to the presence of disturbed amphipod (Ampelisca) tube mats. Stage III organisms were present in half of the replicate images and 11 of the 15 stations. The median OSI ranged from +7 to +11, with an overall average of +8.3 (Figure 3-46; Table 3-7). A replicate-averaged OSI of < +6 suggested a disturbed benthic habitat at Station SOSE. A number of replicates had indeterminant OSI values due to camera faceplate wiper smearing or artifacts on the sediment profile. The overall average OSI in 1997 was slightly higher than that observed during the survey conducted in 1995 (+7.4), indicating a slight improvement in benthic conditions. 3.4 Northern Region 3.4.1 1997 Master Bathymetric Survey The 2100 X 2100 m precision bathymetric survey performed over the NLDS provided a new DGPS baseline to aid in the development of a Geographic Information System (GIS) database for the disposal site, as well as to facilitate comparisons with future project-specific surveys. This survey yielded a bathymetric chart of the 4.41 km? area with a minimum depth of 13.5 m over the NL-RELIC mound and a maximum depth of 24.75 m approximately 100 m south of the disposal site boundary (Figure 3-48). A total of 11 dredged material disposal mounds were apparent within the confines of the disposal site, although many of them overlapped to form one larger feature. A vertically exaggerated, three-dimensional view of the NLDS displays the various dredged material deposits in contrast to the natural topography, indicating the presence of a central “bowl” surrounded by dredged material mounds (Figure 3-49). The overall topography of the NLDS slopes from a depth of less than 14 m in the Northern Region towards the south and southwest. A northwest-southeast oriented trough divides the area elevated by active dredged material disposal throughout the center of the site and the elevated area in the southwest corner (Figures 3-48 and 3-49). This ridge is in close proximity to the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) special purposes buoy “NL.” The data collected as part of the July 1986 master bathymetry survey covered an area of the seafloor Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 I1l NL-94 Mound 1997 RPD and OSI Values 4.43, 450NW a 6.15 400NW ae 1oow AZ Q NA 41 4. DA 96 @ 4) NA Acoustically Detectable Margins of the Mound 4.28 Overall Average A 8.3 RPD Station A OSI Figure 3-46. Distribution map of mean RPD and median OSI values calculated for the 1997 survey over the NL-94 Mound Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 NL-94 Mound 1997 Successional Stage Acoustically Detectable Margins of the Mound Station A Successional Stage NLDS EE OZ. Om 200 m Figure 3-47. Distribution map of successional stage calculated for the 1997 survey over the NL-94 Mound Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 113 September 1997 Master Bathymetric Survey 41° 16.750° N 41° 16.500’ N-£ 41° 16.250°N4 41° 16.000° N 41° 15.750° N 72° 05.000° W 72° 04.500° W 72° 04.000° W NLDS Depth in meters NAD 83 Figure 3-48. Bathymetric chart of New London Disposal Site (contour interval = 0.25 m) Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 September 1997 Bathymetry NLDS Depth in meters NAD 83 Figure 3-49. Three-dimensional view of the bathymetry of NLDS (vertical exaggeration | 37.25) Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 115 approximately 1200 m to the southwest of the current disposal site boundaries (Figure 3-50). Depth difference comparisons between the 1986 and 1997 surveys (corrected to MLLW and NAD 83) show sizable accumulations of dredged material corresponding to the formation of several mounds, including the Seawolf (1995) NL-TR/USCGA (1989-90), and NL-88 (1988) mounds. There were no corresponding changes in depth between 1986 and 1997 near the “NL” buoy (Figure 3-50). As a result, this ridge represents a natural geologic feature on the seafloor of eastern Long Island Sound. Survey artifacts were identified in the northern area of the disposal site along the east-west slope visible in Figure 3-50. The small patches of apparent accumulation in the southern portion of the disposal site also may be a result of “noise” from various bottom features. 3.4.2 NLDS Northern Region The Northern Region of NLDS (Figure 2-7) was surveyed in September 1997 using precision bathymetry and REMOTS® photography to provide an adequate baseline for valid depth difference calculations and assessment of benthic conditions in future surveys. 3.4.2.1 Bathymetry Depths in the Northern Region ranged from approximately 14 m near the northern end of the NL-RELIC mound to >23 m in the southwest corner (Figure 3-51). The deepest area of the Northern Region was consistent with the overall topography of the area. 3.4.2.2 REMOTS® Sediment-Profile Photography The September 1997 REMOTS survey of the Northern Region consisted of sampling at eleven stations (Figure 2-7). Historic dredged material was detected at seven of the eleven stations distributed within the region. Dredged material was commonly characterized by a chaotic sediment fabric, gray clay, or disturbed surficial layers, and in most cases was easily distinguished from the brown, sandy ambient material. Dredged material was not detected in any replicate image obtained from Stations N1, N3, N5, and N10 (Table 3-8). However, some historical material placed over 20 years ago at the NL-Relic mound, near Station NS, may now appear similar to ambient material. Station N9, located at the northern edge of the Seawolf Mound may have been influenced by dredged material disposed during the 1995-96 disposal season. Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 116 ‘(uBIs< ay} Aq peyeolpul) ssouyo1U} 4eAe] jelWa}ewW peHpoup jo ayewNse wWnwiuIW e SI UMOUS BNjeA UAW ay} UdU} ‘Se}eo!|des Om) Sea] Je UI UJdep uoljesj;oued wusiid ay} pepesoxe jeua}ew pebpaip J ‘uoNe}s yoke ye pazAjeue pue pouleyqo sebew! oye01|de1 E=u 10} SUeSW O1e UMOUS SONIE/ ,, EOP i 1s ll JEOUO}SIY | ZOE I Ls lI 0 p< 1s Ta Wa slomeas ¢ 6N €%p7 TI NO Il LS jeo110})S14 | : @N €%p Ill NO Il 1S Wa someas | ZN ‘JEOUO}SIY | ajqeyen I OL MLSs Ta JEdUO}SIY Z : ON €%p% {Il NO Il 1s Ta 0 GN €%p {Ill NO Il 1s TM Jeouoysiy | i vN €or {il OL Wis TT 0 €N € OP INO Il Ls Tia JEOU0}SIY | : ZN €%p7 {Ill NO ll 1S 0 LN uolBay YON xx(W9) jenajyen ues (wid) ues pebpaig/m abejs sabes sdoy SSOUHIIY] | UOlNeIOUdd yseyubiy =| jeuoissa20ns Ronaatinn jeueyeyy BawieD pebpag (wo) ueay juasald yuasald uelpe ssauyhnoy iso Asepunog ADAING £66] 9) 10 AtvUIUING synsoy Aydv.ss0}OY IO1g-JUIWIPIS @SLOWAY WOIsdYy UW.1IYI.10N SG'IN 8-¢ F142 L Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 — 1998 117 Depth Difference September 1997 versus July 1986 Master Bathymetric Survey 41° 16.750’ N-jae Depth Difference Due To Survey Artifacts 41° 16.500’ N+ 41° 16.250° N 41° 16.000’ N 41° 15.750°N 72° 05.250° W 72° 04.750° W 72° 04.250° W NLDS Difference in meters NAD 83 —k = Om 400m Figure 3-50. Depth difference between the 1986 and 1997 master bathymetric surveys Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 118 UOISIY UISYWON 94) Jo AouAYIeG 166] Joquiaidss ‘*[S-¢ aNnsIy €8 QVN SJa}elW Ul U}deq ae SSS ee Asepunog ais jesodsig juewng AnawiAujeg 266) 4equie}deg uoiBey WieyON SIN Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 119 Fine to very fine sand characterized the sediment at most stations in the Northern Region, as the major modal grain size was 4 to 3 phi (very fine sand) in most photographs (Table 3-8). At Station N9 fine sediments, either gray clay or brown clayey silt (>4 phi), were predominant. In contrast, one replicate at Station N6 contained gravel with overlying shells. Station 10 had two photographs with a coarser grain size of fine sand (3 to 2 phi). Surface sand overlying fine-grained sediment (sand over mud stratigraphy) was noted in one-fourth of the photographs from the region. Despite the occasional appearance of an overlying sand layer, all of the stations in the Northern Region had relatively low boundary roughness values, with a replicate- averaged mean of 0.9 cm. The coarse grain size in replicates at Station N6 and N10, in addition to the predominance of shell lag and disturbed tube mats on the sediment surface, indicated potential bottom current scouring. Although some stations were indeterminant or had biogenic activity, boundary roughness was primarily due to physical forces. The replicate-averaged apparent RPD ranged from 0 to 6.2 cm (3.0 average; Figure 3-52; Table 3-8). At Station N9, two replicates had an indeterminate RPD and one replicate had no RPD visible due to the presence of gray clay. Seven replicate images collected throughout the region had a visible redox rebound ranging from 4 cm to 7 cm depth, suggesting a recent reduction in RPD depth. The biological assemblage at the Northern Region stations showed a dominance of Stage II organisms (amphipods) with some Stage III organisms present (Table 3-8). The Stage II organisms settle and create dense tube mats on the sediment surface, filtering particles from currents they create at the top of the tubes. This high density of tubes and filtering activity may serve to exclude Stage I organisms. Only a few replicates were suspected of having retro-Stage II conditions. Stage III organisms, indicated by sub- surface feeding voids, were present in 13 replicates of the Northern Region stations (Figure 3-53). Median OSI values ranged from +1 to +11 over the Northern Region, with an overall average of +7.4 (Table 3-8). The majority of the stations had OSI values > +6. The lowest OSI was detected at Station N9, where gray clay was present from the nearby Seawolf disposal mound. The highest possible OSI value, +11, was calculated for four replicate images and assigned to Station N8. Neither low dissolved oxygen conditions nor methane were observed in any of the photographs collected in September 1997. Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 SC'IN JO UOIal WIDYLION oY} JOAO sonjea [SQ pue Gdy Jo uoNqisIq ISO VW suoners @S LOWY UolBey WeYyyoN addy Aiepunog ays jesodsig snolAdd M .000°%0 ozZ M .00S°0 o2Z M .000'S0 .2Z ee (ie A Gwen TS) coy J Fee Asepunog 97z1§ jesodsig yuauing AnewAujyeg 266) 4equie}des uoIBay WISYLION SIN - SUOE}S @S}JOWY 2661 “7S-€ BANS N .00v'9L obY ——F-N .009°91 ob? Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 121 SCIN JO UOIsoY UJOYLION oY) JOAO sade|quasse o3ejs [LUOTSS9dNNS JO UOTINGINSIG: “ES-¢ AINSI abejys jeuoissa99ns WY suones @S LOWY UolBey WeyON Aiepunog ays jesodsig snoineid M .000°¥0 ZZ M .00S°90 .2Z M _.000°SO .c2 - ; N .00b'91 oLb ih Thal ol oe = SS AMIRI. i sy IE FC So = row GA & N .009°91 obb We ee iy a eee ll i. el Seon yn we ven 7 Cit Vv. ea ees ae ee Asepunog ajis jesodsig jueung N .008’9b ob? AyyswiAyjeg 266| Jequieydes uolGey WaYON SCN - SUONe}S @sS}oWaY 2661 Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 i bo bBo 3.5 NL-92 Disposal Mound The NL-92 mound is a small dredged material disposal mound formed by the disposal of approximately 18,000 m3 of dredged material at the NDA 92-2 buoy. This small deposit was detected in the August 1995 bathymetric survey (Figure 3-35). A 0.56 km? area surrounding the NDA 92-2 buoy position was selected as the area of detailed analysis. The NL-92 mound was found to be 140 m wide, with a maximum height of 0.6 m (Figure 3-54). A REMOTS® sediment-profile photography survey was not conducted over the NL-92 mound, because this location was planned to be used for dredged material disposal relatively soon after the bathymetric survey. 3.6 | NLDS Reference Areas Three reference areas for NLDS (NLON REF, NE REF and WEST REF) were surveyed with the REMOTS® sediment-profile camera in August 1992, August 1995, September 1997 and July 1998. These reference areas provide a basis for comparison with the images collected over the NLDS project mounds and aid in determining the health of the benthic community within the disposal site. The condition at NLON REF, NE REF, and WEST REF is presumed to reflect seasonal and annual variations in environmental conditions. Three replicate photographs were collected at each reference area station and subjected to the identical series of measurements and criteria used to characterize benthic habitat within the disposal site. A complete set of REMOTS® image analysis results for each reference area and each survey are presented in Appendix B. 3.6.1 August 1992 Survey A 13-station cross-shaped grid was established over each of the three NLDS reference areas in August 1992 (Figure 2-8). The results obtained from the reference areas were used in comparison to the data collected over the NL-91 and D/S mound complex. Dredged material was not apparent at any of the reference stations. Sediment layering (sand-over-mud stratigraphy) was noted in multiple replicate photographs at NE REF and NLON REF. The surfaces at these stations were characterized by shell fragments and fine sands overlying silt and clay, with the formation of some bedforms (ripples). The stations over NE REF and NLON REF displayed very similar sediment grain size distributions, relative to the disposal site, with a major mode of 3 to 4 phi (very fine sand; Table 3-9). The WEST REF was also characterized as predominantly sand, but sediment grain size major modes varied between 2 to 3 phi (medium to fine sand), Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 123 Table 3-9 NLDS Reference Area REMOTS® Sediment-Profile Photography Results Summary for the 1992 Survey Camera in Si Boundary Number | Penetration Z j Roughness Mean (cm) i Mean (cm) Mound/ Ref Area NLON REF NLON REF t i : Stage II NLON REF t t f Stage II NLON REF \ t : Stage II NLON REF b ! : Stage Il ON Stage III NLON REF i i A Stage II NLON REF ! Y 2 Stage II NLON REF : ! d Stage II NLON REF : \ : Stage II NLON REF : f é Stage | NLON REF ; t : Stage II ON Stage III NLON REF i t ; Stage II NLON REF : I f Stage II 7.05 0.00 i Stage Il 9.48 0.00 HUN Stage Il ON Stage III 9.61 0.00 ll Stage II 7.59 0.00 1M! Stage I ON Stage III 6.97 0.00 LILI | Stage Il ON Stage III 8.46 0.00 " Stage II 10.61 0.00 11H Stage II ON Stage III 8.24 0.00 11,1 Stage Il ON Stage III 8.69 0.00 HU Stage Il ON Stage I! 8.69 0.00 i TT 7.33 0.00 i TAT 7.58 0.00 i TAT Stage Il ON Stage III 8.00 0.00 i Stage II Stage | ON Stage III Stage | Stage Ill INDET Stage | ON Stage III Stage | ON Stage III Stage | ON Stage I!! 6.41 0.00 10.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 Depth Difference 41° 16.600° N 41° 16.500° N 72° 05.000° W 72° 04.9800°W 72°04.800°W 72° 04.700° W NLDS NL-92 Mound Mound Height in Meters NAD 27 EE EZ Om 200 m Figure 3-54. NL-92 mound, depth difference from August 1992 to August 1995, 0.2 m contour interval Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 125 3 to 4 phi (very fine sand) and >4 (silt). Shell fragments and shell lag deposits were also a major characteristic of the surface sediments at WEST REF. Each of the three reference areas showed relatively low intra- and inter-station mean boundary roughness values, ranging from 0.0 cm to 2.2 cm across all three areas (Table 3-9). Boundary roughness determinations were classified as biogenic for the majority of the photographs collected in August 1992. The replicate averaged RPD depths within the three areas ranged from 0.0 cm to 2.3 cm, the overall average RPD was 1.44 cm (Table 3-9). The WEST REF exhibited slightly deeper RPD layers than those at NE REF and NLON REF. No redox rebound layers were observed in any of the replicate images collected at the three reference areas. The NE and NLON reference areas exhibited Stage II populations (amphipod tube mats) with several stations progressing to Stage III, while the reference area WEST REF showed signs of recent benthic disturbance. Five of the 13 stations sampled at WEST REF had exclusively Stage I populations (Table 3-9). Four stations had Stage I organisms colonizing the sediment surface over Stage III deposit feeders at depth. The eastern-most station displayed evidence of a healthy Stage III population. Stations 300 m north, 100 m east, and 200 m east had indeterminate successional stages due to low camera penetration. The median OSI values at the reference areas in 1992 ranged from +2 to +8, with an overall average of +5.4. The majority of stations had index values of +5 and +7 (Table 3-9). There were five indeterminate stations at the disposal site and three at the WEST REEF area, due to indeterminate RPD values or successional stages. Neither low DO conditions nor sediment methane were noted at any of the 39 reference stations in August 1992. 3.6.2 August 1995 Survey The surficial sediments at the NLDS reference areas (NLON REF, NE REF, and WEST REF) were examined with REMOTS® sediment-profile photography as part of the August 1995 survey. These reference areas served as a baseline for determining the health of the benthic community at the NL-94 and USCGA mounds, as well as the NL-91 and D/S mound complex. In contrast to 1992, a total of 15 stations were surveyed in August 1995 (four at NLON REF, five at NE REF, and six at WEST REF). These stations were randomly distributed within a 300-m radius of the center of each reference area (Figure 2-8). Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 126 No dredged material was present in any replicate photograph obtained from the three reference areas. Camera penetration depth ranged from 3.0 cm to 9.6 cm, and was shallowest at WEST REF (Table 3-10). Despite the relatively low penetration, sand-over- mud layering was observed in all replicate photographs from NE REF and in two replicate photographs from NLON REF Station 2. No evidence of mud was seen at WEST REF. All of the reference areas were predominantly characterized as fine to very fine sand (Table 3-10). At NE REF and NLON REF, the major modal grain size was 4 to 3 phi (very fine sand) in all but one photograph from NE REF. NE REF Station 4 had a major modal grain size of >4 phi (silt/clay). At WEST REF, the sediment was mostly 3 to 2 phi (fine sand). WEST REF Station 5 was dominated by 2 to 1 phi (medium sand). All of the reference area REMOTS® photographs showed low boundary roughness. Averaged boundary roughness values for the stations ranged from 0.4 cm to 1.6 cm and were attributed to biogenic activity. The apparent RPD depth ranged from 0.7 cm to 2.9 cm at the reference stations. The average RPD value was 1.76 cm at WEST REF, 1.04 cm at NE REF, and 1.51 cm at NLON REEF (Table 3-10). Two REMOTS® photographs at WEST REF (Station 2/B and Station 6/B) showed no RPD and indications of low apparent DO conditions within the bottom waters. No redox rebound layers were detected in any of the 1995 reference area photographs. In general, the reference areas displayed a solid Stage II benthic community with progression into Stage II on III at all but two stations (NE REF Station 2 and NLON REF Station 4; Table 3-10). Dense amphipod tube mats were present at all three reference areas. The replicate image obtained from WEST REF Station 6/B was classified as azoic, while the remaining two photographs (obtained within a 25 meter radius) displayed healthy Stage II and Stage III benthic communities. This suggests a very recent and highly localized benthic disturbance. Median OSI values ranged from +4 to +8 at the reference stations during the 1995 survey, with an overall average of +5.9. This shows a slight improvement in overall benthic conditions, relative to the August 1992 survey despite one replicate photograph at NLON REF (Station 2/B) and two replicates at WEST REF (Station 2/B and Station 6/B) showing evidence of low DO conditions or enrichment. No methane gas was apparent in any replicate image. Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 127 (wid) uvayAl ssouysnoy Aiepunog (1yd) mtPoW | uvaq ISO apow ISO Jofe aZIg UBD il! NO I LS 13QGNI il NO I 1S is ii NO i LS iy NO ll 1S INO Il 1s it NO Wt Ls it NO We Ls i LS i NO We Ls I LS NO tl LS it NO I 1S Il NO lis juasai dg advjs saysIH 00°0 00°0 00°0 00°0 00'0 00'0 Wl LACNI NIL iH WNT Wl Wl HN Well yuasaid 3 fins paspaiqg /M sday [Buolssasans (uid) uvayl Uu01j}BI0T day LSAM day LSAM dau LSSM day LSAM day LSAM day LSAM 43uy AN dau AN day AN day AN day AN day NON day NOTIN 43u NOIN 43u NOIN vay Jeu /Punoy AVAANG S66 24) A0J ArBUIUINS s}[nNsay Ayde.ss0j0Y I101g-JUSUIIPIS @SLOWAA &21V 9909.19J9y SC'IN OT-€ F421. Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 128 3.6.3 September 1997 Survey A total of 13 randomly selected stations were surveyed with the REMOTS® sediment-profile camera at NUON REF, NE REF and WEST REF reference areas as part of the September 1997 field effort. Four stations were surveyed in NLON REF, four at WEST REF, and five in the NE REF. These data were used as the basis for comparison in assessing benthic habitat quality over the NL-94 mound and the NL-91 and D/S mound complex. No dredged material was present in any of the replicate photographs obtained from the three reference areas. Replicate averaged camera penetration depth ranged from 4.6 cm to 10.3 (Table 3-10). The shallow to moderate camera penetration documented limited sand-over-mud layering at several stations within each reference area. All of the reference areas showed some evidence of physical reworking or erosion of sediment as shown by the following characteristics: poor sediment sorting, shell layers near the surface (shell lag), hydroids, or ripped up amphipod tube mats. WEST REF showed the most widespread evidence of physical reworking, with shell lag at 4 out of 6 stations. All of the reference areas were similar in sediment grain size distributions with a predominant major mode of 3 to 4 phi (very fine sand). Station 10 in the WEST REF was an exception to this and exhibited a predominant grain size major mode of 2 to 3 phi (medium to fine sand; Table 3-10). Each of the three reference areas showed relatively low intra- and inter-station mean boundary roughness thickness values, ranging from 0.39 cm to 1.39 cm (Table 3-10). The overall average boundary roughness was 0.73 cm, with the majority of replicates displaying physical disturbances. The replicate averaged RPD ranged from 1.75 cm to 3.48 cm, with an overall mean of 2.35 cm within the three areas (Table 3-10). Redox rebound layers approximately 5 cm deep were identified in two replicates obtained from NE REF. The NE REF and WEST REF reference areas exhibited primarily Stage II populations, with several stations having Stage III present (Table 3-10). The reference area NLON REF showed primarily Stage II organisms progressing to Stage III (three of four stations) and one station in which Stage I organisms were present at the sediment surface over Stage III deposit feeders. The images from NLON REF and NE REF showed dense amphipod tube mats (Stage II). The mats at NE REF were in the process of being eroded during the survey, while those at NLON REF were largely intact. Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 129 Median OSI values for the reference area REMOTS® stations ranged from +5 to +10, with an overall average of +6.8 (Table 3-10). Once again, the reference areas in 1997 showed a small improvement in benthic habitat conditions relative to previous years (1995 and 1992). No low DO conditions or methane gas was detected in any replicate image. 3.6.4 July 1998 Survey As part of the July 1998 survey over NLDS, 13 randomly selected stations were surveyed with the REMOTS® sediment-profile camera at NUON REF, NE REF and WEST REF reference areas. Four stations were surveyed in NLON REF, four at WEST REF, and five in the NE REF. These data were used as the basis for comparison in assessing benthic habitat quality over the NL-91 and D/S mound complex. Camera penetration ranged from 5.6 cm to 11.7 cm, with an average of 7.8 cm, which was comparable with 1997 results (Table 3-11). No evidence of dredged material was apparent in any of the photographs. Sand or sandy silt over mud stratigraphy was observed in many of the photographs. Sediments at NE REF and NLON REF were moderately sorted, whereas WEST REF sediments were primarily poorly sorted. Organic detrius, surface scour, and/or shell fragments were present at the surface in many of the replicates. Fine to very fine sands (3 to 4 phi) characterized most of the sediment at the reference areas (Table 3-11). Two stations within NE REF were composed primarily of fine-grained sediments (>4 phi) while WEST REF displayed several stations with a significant fine sand component (2 to 3 phi). Boundary roughness values were generally low (<1 cm), except at WEST REF Station W13 (STA 08), which had a replicate average value of 1.7 cm. Disturbances within the surface sediments at the reference areas were primarily attributed to physical forces. However, evidence of biological activity causing the surface disturbance was present in approximately 33% of the reference area photographs. The RPD depths ranged from 1.55 cm to 3.98 cm, with an overall average of 2.55 cm (Table 3-11). In general, the RPD depths at both NLON REF and WEST REF tended to be deeper relative to NE REF. Redox rebound layers were apparent roughly 4 cm below the sediment-water interface at two stations within NE REF (Stations 10 and 12). Tube mats were common at the reference areas; some of these mats appeared to be disturbed at NE REF and WEST REF. Stage II was considered the dominant successional Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 130 stage. Stage I was found at multiple stations in all three reference areas, but only seven replicates had active feeding voids at depth to indicate the presence of Stage III individuals. The OSI median values ranged from +5 to +10, with an overall average of +6.7. These were very similar to values observed in 1997 (+6.8). No replicates had low dissolved oxygen conditions, although a few replicates from NE REF did portray dark, sulfidic sediments. No methane gas pockets were detected in the images obtained from the reference areas in July 1998. Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 131 (wid) uBayAl ssauysnoy juvipayA ISO Arepunog azig WIeAD It LS Ls i! NO Il LS i 1S iy NO Wt LS is i 1s 1s i NO Wt LS INO I Ls iy OL W LS iT NO W Ls i NO | LS yuasatg a3¥}S JSOySI }UISa1g Sade}S (wd) [Buolssaoong | ues ddl xx (WD) ued] (Wd) UBT ssauyIyy | uoneaaueg [eL193e]A] BAILED pespaig [eltajeyA] podpaiqd/a sday jo Jaquiny] day 1SAM day 1SSM day 1SAM day LSAM day SN day AN dau AN 43uY AN day AN 43uY NOIN 45Y NOIN dau NOIN day NOIN Bay PU /punoy] AVAING £66] 24) 10 A1VWUIUINS syNsay AydeisoO}OYg I1JO1g-JUSWIPIS @SLOWAY &21V 9009.10J9 SGN IT-€ e148 L Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 BZ GGL U! Paysi| suOHedo] pue SAWEU YIM UONE|{IUOD JOy (xx ¥1S) SUOEUBIsep UONEIS BE6h « iis i is WN Wis WoLris ti NO Wis Wis INO Wits WNO TLS Wis NO WLS NOI Ls NO IT LS Was sss o'r 99°LL 8201 tes 4 (pO WLS) » IN (€0 VLS) € IN (20 VLS) 2 1N 0 (10 VLS) IN 866) 266} 866) 2661 8661 2661 (1yd) apory sofeyy a71g ujeay yUasatd a8e)S JSaysIHL ssauysnoy Asepunog uelpayy ISO quasi Jepsayepy pasdpasqyar | (wd) ueazy ssauyo|yy (wo) ueayy $a8e)g [EUO|ssazINg (ws) weal ddd sday jo saquinny [epsayeyy paspaiq =| uopesjauag ersmED [easy euasajay | Jou /Punoyy SAOAANG B66] PUL L66] OJ AtvUIUINS sj[nsey AYdvAZOOYg IO1g-}UIWIPIS @S LOWAY LAV 9909.19J2Y SC'IN 132 CI-€ PIGeL 4 ng Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 1torl Mon 4.0 DISCUSSION The New London Disposal Site (NLDS) was monitored over five time intervals during the period 1991-1998 and received dredged material from twelve distinct episodes of disposal (Figure 1-3). The patterns of disposal and monitoring provide an overview of the processes affecting the environment within the disposal site. This report includes specific details regarding individual disposal mounds, their history and monitoring results. This report is the first of two-volume report that covers D/S, NL-91, USCGA, NL-94, and the Northern Region. Volume 2 of this report covers the results of monitoring the U. S. Navy Seawolf mound in 1997 and 1998. Before discussing each mound complex and the baseline study of the northern region, it is helpful to review the evidence of physical and biological response to disposal activity at this site. The master bathymetric survey conducted in 1997 over the revised DAMOS NLDS site boundaries provided data for an analysis of the topographic signature of the disposal site over a ten year period since the prior master survey in 1986 (Section 4.1). The REMOTS® sediment profile photography results from the disposal sites are compared in a general way with the results from the three surrounding reference areas (NLON-REF, NE- REF, and WEST-REF) in Section 4.2. The history and monitoring results of each disposal mound (D/S & NL-91, USCGA, NL-94) are then discussed (Sections 4.3, 4.4, 4.5). Finally, a discussion of the baseline characterization results for the Northern Region is provided in Section 4.6. 4.1 Topography and Evidence of Historical Disposal at the NLDS The 1997 master bathymetric survey showed several key features important for the future management of the NLDS. First, the spatial distribution and topography of the dredged material mounds coincided well with the known buoy locations and mound growth over time as recorded in previous surveys (NUSC 1979, SAI 1980, Parker and Revelas 1989, SAIC 1990a, b, c; 1995a, b; Germano et al. 1995). Coherent disposal mounds can be seen associated with the historical placement of dredged material at the following locations: NL-I (1978), NL-II (1979-80), NL-III (1980-81), Seawolf, NL-85, NL-88, Dow/Stonington & NL-91, USCGA/NL-TR, NL-95, and NL-94/96 (Figure 1-2). Most significantly, the NL-RELIC Mound has been a prominent and unchanging feature at the site since DAMOS bathymetric surveys began in 1977 (NUSC 1979, SAI 1980). The presence of discrete disposal mounds with consistent heights and shapes provides evidence that dredged material placed on the seafloor at the NLDS has been stable for at least twenty years. The importance of these results should be emphasized. Despite clear evidence of surface washing of fine-grained material across the disposal site and a potential for active bedload transport (Knebel et al. 1999, Waddell et al. 1999), the consolidated mass of Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 134 disposal mounds measured as volume in bathymetric depth-difference calculations has been stable over a period of at least twenty years. A three-dimensional view of the master bathymetric survey showed lower topographic relief south of the NL-RELIC Mound, in a depression surrounded by historical dredged material disposal mounds (Figure 3-49). The practice of using the periodic disposal of dredged material to develop topographic barriers was first discussed in relation to NLDS (SAI 1980). This practice was a successful management method during the formation of the NHAV-93 mound at the Central Long Island Sound Disposal Site (Morris 1996). In that study, a topographic depression was used to site the disposal of a major dredging project (New Haven); the disposal of the dredged material in this “bowl” served to restrict its lateral spread. The depression located south of the NL-RELIC mound represents a potential area for similar future management of material at NLDS. However, the location of this bowl directly beneath the U.S. Navy Submarine corridor may place limits on the effective use of this area for dredged material disposal. Buoys located in this corridor are a hazard to submarine navigation and mound height would need to be limited, in order to ensure water depths greater than 14 m. Other topographic low areas are near the margins of the disposal site and include the trough in the southwestern quadrant of the site, which is associated with the natural ridge southwest of the site. 4.2 Biological Response to Disposal at the NLDS The REMOTS® sediment profile data collected from reference areas and within the — disposal site provide an opportunity to compare and contrast the biological response to disposal activity over a six year period (1992-1998). Throughout this period the fresh and recent (1-6 years old) dredged material showed a rapid recovery from a disturbed surface to a healthy benthic assemblage. Areas of historical dredged material (over 6 years old) were not specifically targeted for investigation, but were sampled around the margins of new disposal mounds. These areas all supported a healthy mature benthic community. Reference areas appeared to be recovering in 1992 from some patches of disturbance in 1991 but also recovered rapidly and returned to a more uniform mature benthic community in 1995. All reference areas experienced some limited patches of disturbance (presence of recolonizing Stage I organisms, eroded tube mats, shallow RPDs) at various times within the survey period. None of the individual reference stations exhibited consistent disturbance, that is, the patches were in different places each year. Overall, the reference areas supported a healthy benthic assemblage and displayed typical features of seasonal settlement and disturbance (see below). Assessment of the health of the benthic community at NLDS requires the ability to separate site-specific characteristics from regional environmental characteristics. During Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 135 this time, historical dredged material and reference areas experienced very limited direct physical disturbance, whereas areas that received fresh dredged material experienced a short period of physical disturbance followed by recovery. In some areas, dredged material was placed two or three times during the six years. All of the monitoring surveys were conducted in late summer (July 30-September 6), a period with elevated water temperatures and the potential for ecological stress or seasonal senescence of settling organisms (see below). The most consistent biological characteristic observed over the monitoring period was the widespread presence of tube building amphipods in surface sediments. These organisms collect fine-grained sediments to construct their tubes, and the presence of the tubes enhances trapping and deposition of fine sediments (Mills 1967). The mats can become very dense and restrict bioturbation and circulation in sediments below the tubes (the result is a relatively thin redox potential discontinuity or RPD). In both disposal areas and reference areas, a mixed layer of fine sand and coarse shells was present beneath the tubes, but this layer is often difficult to see. Clumps of mussels also were seen and widely reported from the area within and around the disposal site. In areas with shells or pebbles on the surface, hydroids and mussels were seen attached to the hard substrate. When the amphipod tubes are physically disturbed or abandoned (due to natural seasonal decline, senescence or environmental stress), they are easily eroded, and the sand or shell surface is again exposed to bottom currents. As a result, summer periods (when the tube mats are present and widespread in and around the NLDS) may represent active deposition of fine sediment, with subsequent die-off or thinning of the tubes and sediment reworking in the winter. The surface sediment characteristics are a combination of the material deposited and processes of physical and biological reworking. The DAMOS monitoring results reported here serve to demonstrate that the surface sediment characteristics throughout the disposal site and reference areas became similar over time (with the exception of areas mantled with coarse sand or pebbles). The NLDS is subject to relatively strong tidal currents but is also sheltered from wave disturbance (Waddell et al. 1999). When tidal currents are sufficient to transport fine sand as bedload, some fine materials may be winnowed leaving a lag deposit of sands and shells too large for transport. Semi-diurnal tidal currents at the NLDS appear to be strong enough to rework unconsolidated surface sediments through this process until surface sediments have a lag deposit of sand or shells. However fine surface sediments are also bound by biological activity and may be remarkably resistant to erosion while the organisms are alive. Tidal currents are likely to be slightly weaker in the depression where the NL-91 and D/S mound complex is located compared to the tops of nearby, shallower mounds. Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 136 The result of the surface sediment winnowing process includes six characteristics in REMOTS® images: shell lag, winnowed surfaces, disturbed amphipod tube mats, physical boundary roughness, and sand-over-mud stratigraphy. There are three potential causes for surface disturbance of tube mats: 1) predator foraging; 2) microbial decomposition following the abandonment of the tubes; and 3) disturbance from either trawling or a temporary increase in near-bottom turbulence or current velocity. When tubes are abandoned they are much more susceptible to physical transport by currents. Surface sediment reworking at NLDS appears to be limited to winnowing of fines accumulated during the summer in areas where shell lag armors the surface. The shell lag may form in the fall and winter during periodic storms, then again be covered with tube mats that bind finer sediments in the spring and summer. This seasonal response is observed to be consistent between reference areas and disposal areas, and results in a fluctuation between seafloor surfaces covered with muddy tubes to surfaces with clean shell and fine sand. This seasonal cycle may open opportunities for settlement of recolonizing benthic organisms and explain their patchy distribution at reference areas. Any deposition of fresh dredged material will begin to be exposed to this cycle and will eventually acquire tubes or attached organisms depending on grain size. In general, there is evidence of fall- winter winnowing in many areas of NLDS and spring-summer deposition of finer materials. As shown by the long-term stability of mounds at the site (see above), this cycle does not appear to result in any significant net loss or gain of sediment. 4.2.1 Evidence of Low Dissolved Oxygen In some years (1995, 1997), NLDS appears to have experienced a seasonal or annual environmental stress or disturbance that has affected apparent reduction-oxidation conditions within the sediments across some of the disposal mounds and nearby reference areas. In other years (1992, 1998) there is no evidence of such disturbance. Dissolved oxygen concentrations measured in August 1992 approximately 1 m above the bottom at the disposal site and reference stations ranged from 7.3 mg-I' to 7.8 mg-!', while surface water oxygen concentrations ranged from 7.7 mg:I' to 8.1 mg-I'. These results are comparable to results for August 5, 1992 (7.05 mg-I') from the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection Hypoxia Monitoring Program (CT DEP) measured at Station M3 (Kaputa and Olsen 2000). Station M3 is located at the west end of Fisher's Island, 2 nmi SE of NLDS in greater than 35-m water depth (water depths at NLDS range from 14 m to 24 m). The monitoring surveys conducted in early August 1992, late August 1995, early September 1997 and late July 1998 all revealed the presence of widespread tube-building Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 137 ampeliscid amphipods at the surface sediments. At the time of the surveys, many of the tubes were empty and the mats were susceptible to disturbance. In the surveys conducted later in the summer (1995 and 1997) the sediments underneath the mats contained evidence of restricted circulation in the bottom waters or organic enrichment of the sediments (shallow RPD thicknesses, methane bubbles, senescent tube mats, e.g. at USCGA and NL- 91). The presence of these indicators at the reference areas suggests that a regional environmental stress or disturbance may have affected the eastern LIS region in 1995 and 1997. It is generally assumed that eastern LIS does not experience hypoxic conditions (defined by the EPA’s Long Island Sound Study as 3.0 mg-I" or less). CT DEP data for this region show a seasonal decrease in DO values from May to December with a low period from late July to August or September (Kaputa and Olsen 2000). Stations further away from NLDS (K2, J2, and N3) also follow the same pattern of lower DO values in the surface and bottom waters from May to December. Dissolved oxygen levels normally decrease to 6 or 7 mg-!" for all of these stations. The lowest values recorded since 1991 for these stations approached 5.9 mg-I" in the summer of 1991. Based on the CT DEP time series data there is no evidence that 1995 or 1997 experienced conditions markedly different from 1992 or 1998. However the surveys in 1995 and 1997 were conducted later in the summer when environmental stress may have been sustained for a longer period. While these measured values do not seem sufficient for true hypoxia, they may contribute to the conditions observed. The most likely explanation for the presence of patches of reduced sediments and methane is that seasonal senescence of dense mats of tube building amphipods may create temporary reducing conditions near the sediment surface. Once these mats are eroded, the reduced sediments will be exposed to overlying waters and rapidly oxidized through bioturbation and diffusion. Sediment profile surveys conducted during this period (late August - early September) might contain all three of these conditions (senescent tube mats and reduced sediments, reduced surface sediments, thin RPD at surface). DAMOS surveys in western and central Long Island Sound have noted that survey data during late summer may be complicated by the sediment disturbance induced by hypoxic conditions and have recommended that surveys should be conducted in early summer or early fall after recovery (Morris 1998, Murray and Saffert 1999). While the eastern Long Island Sound may not experience hypoxia, it seems clear that seasonal biological processes may affect survey results. Future surveys at NLDS could optimally be scheduled after recolonization has begun (early June) but before mid-August when tube mats appear to senesce. Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 138 4.3 Capping of the Dow/Stonington Disposal Mound The NL-91 and D/S mound complex reflects a complicated history. The products of seven disposal sequences are reflected in the results of four separate monitoring surveys. These results show that a low mound complex was formed in 1991-1992 from mixed deposits rather than a distinct capped mound. This mound complex had a thin layer of sand covering the central region that was subsequently covered with additional cap material in 1997-1998 (Figure 3-30). While the intended capping process was not completed as originally planned in 1992, the presence of the sand layer and addition of subsequent cap material in 1997-1998 has provided sufficient interim isolation of the material intended for capping. Throughout the survey period this mound complex supported a healthy benthic community that progressed rapidly from early colonizers to a more mature state. There was no evidence of adverse environmental impact from the sediments and the surface of the mound responded physically and biologically the same as other mounds and the reference areas. Further, additional sediment was sent to this location from 1998-2000, and the results of follow-up surveys will be presented in a future report. Dredged material disposal activities at NLDS were confined to the period between mid-October 1991 through mid-January 1992. Within those 90 days, the NDA buoy was moored at four different locations, the D/S buoy was removed from the site during capping operations and never recovered, and the U.S. Navy established a 300-m wide corridor for submarines transiting through NLDS. In the midst of an unusually active buoy management cycle, an apparent error in navigation information during disposal resulted in much of the CDM being placed somewhat to the east of the buoy, leading to the formation of the irregularly-shaped NL-91 and D/S mound complex (Figure 3-9). The depth difference map generated using survey data collected before and after CDM disposal indicated that the bulk of the CDM was placed east of the NDA and D/S buoys (Figure 3-8). REMOTS® sediment-profile photographs were further assessed to determine if thickness of material <20 cm could be mapped to further delineate the distribution of dredged material (see Section 4.3.2 and Figure 3-11). 4.3.1 Benthic Recolonization The area surrounding the NL-91 and D/S mound complex consistently showed evidence of rapid benthic recolonization (Stage I progressing to Stage II with Stage III) similar to results expected from sediments with a low potential for adverse biological effects (Figure 3-24). In 1992, after the initial placement of material, the mounds supported active benthic colonization and were more advanced than predicted. Median OSI values ranging from +2.0 to +8.0 (average +4.9) were comparable to those of the Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 139 reference areas (Figure 3-27 and Tables 3-1 and 3-9). The recolonization status of the area around the NL-91 and D/S mound complex was characterized as supporting a solid Stage II population with some progression into Stage III assemblages. Apparent RPD values of the NL-91 and D/S mound complex tended to be slightly lower, but comparable to those of the two eastern reference areas (NE-REF and NLON-REF). In 1995, three years after the NL-91 and D/S mound complex was placed, the benthic communities at the most recent disposal mounds were even more advanced than in 1992 and comparable to the reference area benthic community (which had improved). All stations contained Stage II on III successional stages and RPDs had deepened (Table 3-2). OSI values had improved from an average of +4.9 to +8.0. In 1997, the NL-91 and D/S mound complex continued to support a healthy benthic community. The dominant successional stages were Stage II or Stage II on III (Table 3-3). The median OSI values ranged from +2.0 to +11, with an overall average of +8.6, slightly higher than measured in 1995. After placement of additional cap material in 1998, the NL-91 and D/S mound complex again supported a healthy benthic community. The dominant successional stages were Stage II or Stage II on III communities (Table 3-4). Recolonization of the new dredged material was rapid and many of the replicate photographs from these regions showed Stage III feeding voids. The station median OSI values ranged from +3.0 to +11.0, with an overall average of +7.5, which was only slightly lower than prior to the placement of new material (1997). 4.3.2 Sediment Distribution and Characterization The evidence from sediment profile photography of the distribution of dredged material released during the 1991-1992 disposal season is consistent with the placement of a mixed deposit of Dow UDM and Stonington UDM and Port Niantic material near the D/S buoy, and east of the D/S buoy a deposit of Dow CDM (compare Figures 3-8 and 3- 11). REMOTS® photographs collected in 1992 were able to provide a clear delineation of the distribution of fresh dredged material, but it was difficult to clearly separate the source of fresh materials. The UDM and CDM from Dow facilities were quite similar in sediment texture (black silt). However the REMOTS® photographs revealed the presence of a layer of sand over much of the surface of the NL-91 and D/S mound complex. This distinctive sand layer (1.27 cm to 7.03 cm thick) was mixed with dredged shells and small pebbles. The layer is similar in texture to the Port Niantic material targeted for the NDA buoy on 11 and 12 December 1991 at the end of the disposal period (Figure 3-12). REMOTS® photographs collected in the vicinity of the bulk of the CDM deposit detected a thin layer of biologically re-worked dredged material over fresh dredged Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 140 material (Figure 3-10) whereas surrounding the new mounds, the surface sediments were reworked older dredged material (lighter in color). The surface of these deposits converged over time with the development of a reworked shelly sand surface seasonally occupied with amphipod tubes. The lateral edges of the original deposit were clear in 1992, but became less clear as subsequent deposition and reworking caused the surface sediments to converge in appearance. This similarity in appearance indicates a continual effect of biological and physical reworking as amphipods trap mud and tidal currents transport fine sand and shell fragments. In 1997 the pattern of distribution was quite uniform with fine to very fine sand over the entire survey area including the NL-91 and D/S mound complex, and similar to the reference areas. After deposition of new material in 1997-1998, a fresh layer was found over the center of the Dow/Stonington UDM (Figure 3-29). The 1997-1998 disposal logs indicated that 6,850 m? of sediments were placed over the northern area of the D/S mound as supplemental cap (Figure 3-30). This material was seen as distinctive layers of fresh dredged material in stations over the older D/S Mound sediments and to the north (Figure 3-33). In some stations to the east, the new material was not sufficiently distinct to measure thickness but was darker and showed fewer signs of biological reworking. One location beyond the southern margin of the NL-91 and D/S mound complex (1992 Station 400 S) had a distinctive layer of pebbles, shells and sand on the surface (Figure 3-15). This station is located on the top of a slope at the very edge of older dredged material accumulation. It is likely to represent a lag deposit formed from older dredged material. It also provides a useful reference mark because this coarse material was detected in each subsequent survey (400S 1992 became Stations 200S in 1995, 1997, 1998; Figures 3-21,3-26,3-31). The consistency of results from this station located just beyond the margin of the disposal mound complex over a period of six years combined with no net topographic change is clear evidence of the physical stability (armoring) of this area. The NL-91 and D/S mound complex is located in a depression surrounded by disposal mounds which provide protection from tidal currents and waves. This mound complex has remained physically stable from 1992 through 1998. During this time the mound and surrounding areas have supported a stable, healthy benthic community. Any significant physical erosion (more than about a centimeter) or impact from biologically unsuitable sediments would have been evident in the REMOTS® sediment profile photographs collected during this period. Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 117 Depth Difference September 1997 versus July 1986 Master Bathymetric Survey 41° 16.750° N Depth Difference Due To Survey Ste Artifacts 41° 16.500° N7— 41° 16.250° N 41° 16.000° N 41° 15.750° N 72° 05.250° W 72° 04.750° W 72° 04.250° W NLDS Difference in meters NAD 83 Om 400 m Figure 3-50. Depth difference between the 1986 and 1997 master bathymetric surveys Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 — 1998 118 UOISY UOYVION oy} Jo AnowAyyeQ 166] Joquiaideg “[g-¢ BANS wo €8 QVN sJa}aw ul ujdeq Asepunog ej jesodsiq snoiaeld NM .000'¥ .¢Z NM .00S'P .cZ NM .000'S .¢Z N 00991 olP POs 00:9 ee ° (Se; ae ae ee ee ee ee ee Asepunog ajis jesodsig wua1ing AuyouiAyjyeg 266) Jequie}des uolbey WieYyON SIN N 00891 bv Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 119 Fine to very fine sand characterized the sediment at most stations in the Northern Region, as the major modal grain size was 4 to 3 phi (very fine sand) in most photographs (Table 3-8). At Station N9 fine sediments, either gray clay or brown clayey silt (>4 phi), were predominant. In contrast, one replicate at Station N6 contained gravel with overlying shells. Station 10 had two photographs with a coarser grain size of fine sand (3 to 2 phi). Surface sand overlying fine-grained sediment (sand over mud stratigraphy) was noted in one-fourth of the photographs from the region. Despite the occasional appearance of an overlying sand layer, all of the stations in the Northern Region had relatively low boundary roughness values, with a replicate- averaged mean of 0.9 cm. The coarse grain size in replicates at Station N6 and N10, in addition to the predominance of shell lag and disturbed tube mats on the sediment surface, indicated potential bottom current scouring. Although some stations were indeterminant or had biogenic activity, boundary roughness was primarily due to physical forces. The replicate-averaged apparent RPD ranged from 0 to 6.2 cm (3.0 average; Figure 3-52; Table 3-8). At Station N9, two replicates had an indeterminate RPD and one replicate had no RPD visible due to the presence of gray clay. Seven replicate images collected throughout the region had a visible redox rebound ranging from 4 cm to 7 cm depth, suggesting a recent reduction in RPD depth. The biological assemblage at the Northern Region stations showed a dominance of Stage II organisms (amphipods) with some Stage III organisms present (Table 3-8). The Stage II organisms settle and create dense tube mats on the sediment surface, filtering particles from currents they create at the top of the tubes. This high density of tubes and filtering activity may serve to exclude Stage I organisms. Only a few replicates were suspected of having retro-Stage II conditions. Stage III organisms, indicated by sub- surface feeding voids, were present in 13 replicates of the Northern Region stations (Figure 3-53). Median OSI values ranged from +1 to +11 over the Northern Region, with an overall average of +7.4 (Table 3-8). The majority of the stations had OSI values > +6. The lowest OSI was detected at Station N9, where gray clay was present from the nearby Seawolf disposal mound. The highest possible OSI value, +11, was calculated for four replicate images and assigned to Station N8. Neither low dissolved oxygen conditions nor methane were observed in any of the photographs collected in September 1997. Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 ~ 1998 SCIN JO UOIZO1 WISYON ou} JOAO Sonyea [SO pue Gdy Jo uonqmsiq °7S-¢ aansIy ISO W suonels @SLOWSY Uolbey UeyON du Asepunog ajis jesodsig snolAeld M .000°¥0 oz NM .00S°0 22 AA .000°S0 22 N .00V'9L obv VAS ¥ obeiny Teen J ‘ Cpe Cee AY | iy N .009°91 ob? ey ® eV N ° oo WON 76 | 9N 6L gv 8N > i Ge pelte” toss fect Asepunog eS jesodsig yuauing N .008°91 obv AnewAujeg 66) Jequieydes uoibey UJOYON SCIN - SUOI}E}S @s}owSY L661 Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 147 The Northern Region of the NLDS is an area that is relatively flat and uniform supporting a stable, mature benthic community. The depths in the northern half of the region are too shallow to accommodate placement of mounds, but the slope may provide some containment for projects placed in the southern half. Historical dredged material was observed with REMOTS® sediment profile photographs and in each case found to be supporting a healthy benthic community. Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 148 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The New London Disposal Site (NLDS) monitoring results from 1992-1998 form a time-series of observations of individual mounds and the site as a whole including reference areas. This time-series provides insights into physical and biological processes and any potential environmental impacts from the disposal of dredged material at the site. This section provides conclusions for the site and each individual mound or region surveyed (and recommendations for site management). 5.1 Overview of Monitoring e A dredged material management strategy has been successfully developed for NLDS that takes into account regional influences over the site as well as site-specific constraints on dredged material disposal. This strategy has incorporated the use of off- site reference areas to determine regional effects on the site. It also uses preexisting disposal mounds, and a planned placement of mounds to form a "ring of mounds," that will both contain the spread of dredged material on the seafloor and allow unacceptably contaminated dredged material (UDM) to be capped with a minimum amount of capping dredged material (CDM). e The configuration of disposal mounds at the NLDS has remained stable over at least the last twenty years between master surveys, indicating stability of the mass of material at the disposal site, despite sorting and winnowing of surficial fine-grained material. There is strong evidence of stability of deposits placed at NLDS as much as twenty to thirty years ago (NL-RELIC, NL-I, -II, -III and -TR). e All areas surveyed during this period showed evidence of healthy, stable benthic communities and rapid recolonization of dredged material following disposal activities. e Biological activity had a strong seasonal impact on surface sediments. Widespread settlement and growth of tube-building organisms promoted deposition of fine-grained sediment on the surface of NLDS. Senescence or migration of these organisms caused decomposition of tubes and removal of fines and tubes leaving coarser sediment on the surface. e Physical and biological monitoring data from the NLDS were consistent with a model of seasonal winnowing of surficial fine-grained material. This process serves to armor the disposal mounds with a surficial scour lag deposit providing a mechanism for long- term stabilization of the mounds. Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 5.2 149 Reference areas reflected conditions throughout NLDS including: seasonal responses to biological and physical processes and apparent impacts of low dissolved oxygen or organic enrichment. All reference areas supported stable, healthy benthic communities. In 1992 reference area conditions based on the Organism-Sediment Index (OSI) improved over results from 1991, improved again in 1995 and 1997 and remained stable in 1998. An increased presence of Stage II and Stage III organisms at NLON-REF and NE-REF has resulted in higher OSI values and increased RPD depths. Conditions at WEST-REF exhibited signs of a recent benthic disturbance in 1992 and 1995. Low OSI values relative to NE-REF and NLON-REF, and a Stage I or Stage I over Stage III population suggests the area was in recovery from a localized disturbance. Dow/Stonington and NL-91 Mound The NL-91 and D/S mound complex is located in a flat “bowl” formed by surrounding disposal mounds that provides protection from storms and tidal currents. This mound complex was stable throughout the survey period and supported development of a healthy benthic community. Sediment deposition during disposal and capping operations during the 1991-92 disposal season yielded a maximum mound height of 0.7 m at the D/S buoy location and 0.5 m at the NDA buoy location. Disposal operations resulted in the development of overlapping areas of deposition: a low mound at the NDA buoy, an elongated low mound extending eastward from the D/S buoy and a layer of sand mixed with shells and pebbles over a portion of both of these mounds. Inconsistencies in navigation and disposal barge positioning during CDM deposition caused the cap material to be placed somewhat to the east of the main disposal mound. During capping operations, the coordinates for capping points were apparently misinterpreted causing an offset (250 m to 400 m) to the southeast. The material deposited at the CDM points was composed mainly of black silt covered by a layer of biologically-reworked dredged material and fine sand. This bottom feature supported a stable Stage II benthic infaunal assemblage. The material deposited at the D/S buoy was composed of black silt covered with a sand layer 2-7 cm thick. The sand layer was consistent with material from the Port Niantic project disposed at the nearby NDA-91 buoy. This area supported a stable Stage II benthic infaunal assemblage. Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 150 3.3 Monitoring activity over the NL-91 and D/S mound complex in 1995 and 1997 continued to show mature and healthy benthic infaunal populations and sand-over-mud layering over the mound. The recolonization of the area by a diverse benthic community (Stages II and III), representing a broad range of sensitivities, indicates that sediment toxicity and chronic impacts are non-existent or unlikely. The response of the benthic community is a direct indicator of potential for adverse effects and supports a conclusion that either the UDM material was isolated by the surface sediments or the sediments were conservatively classified during the regulatory process. Nonetheless, as a prudent management measure, additional sediments were directed to this location in 1997- 1998 to thicken the cap, accompanied by periodic monitoring to assess any changes. Additional cap material was placed over the central area in 1997-1998 as a conservative management response to the relatively thinner cap coverage attained during the project. A layer of new CDM (2-10 cm) was detected over the central region of the mound using REMOTS® sediment-profile photography. Normal rates of biological recolonization of the mound were observed in 1998. Areas of new CDM had a combination of initial and advanced successional stages showing the standard progression of recovery of the benthic community. USCGA Mound The USCGA Mound was formed in 1994-1995 from 124,000 m3 of material from the U.S. Coast Guard Academy. Approximately 80,500 m3 of CDM was placed over 43,500 m3 of UDM creating a mound 420 m wide and 1 m high at the apex. The mound overlapped and merged with the historical NL-TR Mound in the northeast quadrant of the NLDS. REMOTS® sediment profile results in 1995 indicated that the capped mound was supporting a healthy benthic community. Some stations showed evidence of impact from low dissolved oxygen or organic enrichment, but this was also seen at the reference areas and is attributed to regional conditions of stress. Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 5.4 S)o5) 5.6 151] NL-94 Mound The NL-94 Mound was formed in 1994-1995 from 37,000 m3 of material from the U.S. Navy Submarine Base. Approximately 28,200 m3 of CDM was placed over 8,700 m3 of UDM creating a mound 125 m wide and 0.9 m high. A tongue of dredged material 20-40 cm thick extended 140 m southeast from the mound apex. REMOTS® sediment profile results in 1995 indicated that the capped mound was supporting a healthy benthic community. This represented faster recovery than expected. Some stations showed evidence of impact from low dissolved oxygen or organic enrichment, but this was also seen at the reference areas and is attributed to regional conditions of stress. Additional suitable material was placed in 1996-1997 to the west of the NL-94 Mound at the NDA-96 buoy. The NL-94/96 Mound complex forms a flat ridge in the western center of the NLDS between the southern edge of the Seawolf Mound and the northern edge of NL-I. REMOTS® sediment profile results in 1997 indicated that the new dredged material was supporting a healthy benthic community and recovered more quickly than expected. Northern Region The master bathymetric survey conducted in 1997 extended into an area termed the Northern Region to provide baseline characterization. The plateau and apron of the Seawolf Mound extended into this region, indicated by both bathymetric and REMOTS® data. Historical dredged material was detected in the Northern Region and can be related to pre-DAMOS disposal in the vicinity of the NL-RELIC Mound. The older age of this disposal activity is reflected in a higher successional status compared to the reference areas, for both ambient sediments and historical dredged material. Recommendations The capped mound formed at Dow/Stonington should receive additional material to ensure sufficient cap distribution (50 cm) over all UDM placed at these sites. Following placement of additional CDM, monitoring of the mounds should include Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 assessment of benthic recolonization and dredged material thickness across the mounds’. e Future surveys at NLDS could optimally be scheduled after recolonization has begun (early June) but before mid-August when tube mats appear to senesce. * During the 1998-2000 disposal seasons, over 20,000 m’ of CDM from a number of projects was placed at the D/S mound to augment the cap. Monitoring of the D/S mound was conducted during the summer of 2000, including bathymetric and REMOTS® surveys. The results of these surveys will be published in a subsequent report. Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 153 6.0 REFERENCES Bokuniewicz, H. J.; Gebert, J.; Gordon, R. B.; Higgins, J. L.; Kaminsky, P.; Pilbeam, C. C.; Reed, M.; Tuttle, C. 1978. Field study of the mechanics of the placement of dredged material at open-water disposal sites. Volume II: Appendices J-O. Dredged Material Research Program. Technical Report D-78-7. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS. Carey, D. A. 1998. Long Island Sound Dredged Material Management Approach. A study report prepared for State of Connecticut, Department of Environmental Protection, Office of Long Island Sound Programs, Hartford, CT. 189p, Separate Appendices. Chang, S.; Steimle, F. W.; Reid, R. N.; Fromm, S. A.; Zdanowicz, V. S.; Pikanowski, R. A. 1992. Association of benthic macrofauna with habitat types and quality in the New York Bight. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 89: 237-251. Fredette, T. J.; Kullberg, P. G.; Carey, D. A.; Morton, R. W.; Germano, J. D. 1993. Twenty-five years of Dredged Material Disposal Site Monitoring in Long Island Sound: A Long-Term Perspective. Long Island Sound Research Conference Proceedings, October 23-24, 1992. Publ. No. CT-SG-93-03, Connecticut Sea Grant Program, University of Connecticut, Groton, CT. Fredette, T. J. 1994. Disposal site capping management: New Haven Harbor. Reprinted from Dredging '94, Proceedings of the Second International Conference, November 13-16, 1994. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New England Division, Waltham, MA. Germano, J. D.; Rhoads, D. C.; Lunz, J. D. 1994. An integrated, tiered approach to monitoring and management of dredged material disposal sites in the New England Region. DAMOS Contribution No. 87 (SAIC Report No. SAIC-90/7575&234). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New England Division, Waltham, MA. Germano, J. D.; Parker, J.; Eller, C. F. 1995. Monitoring cruise at the New London Disposal Site, June-July 1990. DAMOS Contribution No. 93 (SAIC Report No.- 90/7599&C93). US Army Corps of Engineers, New England Division, Waltham, MA. Kaputa, N. P.; Olsen, C. B. 2000. Long Island Sound Summer Hypoxia Monitoring Survey 1991-1998 Data Review. Draft February 2000, Bureau of Water Management, Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection, Hartford, CT. Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 154 Knebel, H. J.; Signell, R. P.; Rendigs, R.R.; Poppe, L.J.; List J.H. Jn Press. Seafloor environments in Long Island Sound estuarine system. Marine Geology. Millis, E. L. 1967. The biology of an ampeliscid amphipod crustacean sibling species pair. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada 24: 305-355. Morris, J. T. 1996. Monitoring cruise at the Central Long Island Sound Disposal Site, September 1995. SAIC Report No. 373. Draft report submitted to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New England Division, Waltham, MA. Morris, J. 1998. Monitoring cruise at the Western Long Island Sound Disposal Site, July 1996. DAMOS Contribution No. 119. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New England Division, Concord, MA. Murray, P. M.; Selvitelli, P. 1996. DAMOS navigation and bathymetry standard operating procedures. SAIC Report No. 290. DAMOS reference report. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New England Division, Waltham, MA. Murray, P. M.; Saffert, H. L. 1999. Monitoring cruise at the Western Long Island Sound Disposal Site, September 1997 and March 1998. DAMOS Contribution No. 125. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New England Division, Concord, MA. Naval Underwater Systems Center (NUSC). 1979. Disposal Area Monitoring System (DAMOS) annual data report-1979. Submitted to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New England Division, Waltham, MA. New England River Basins Commission (NERBC). 1980. Interim plan for the disposal of dredged material from Long Island Sound. New England River Basins Commission. Boston, MA. Pp. 1-55. Parker, J. H.; Revelas, E. C. 1989. Monitoring survey at the New London Disposal Site, August 1985-July 1986. DAMOS Contribution No. 60 (SAIC Report No. SAIC- 86/7540&C60). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New England Division, Waltham, MA. Parsons, T. R.; Maita, Y.; Lalli. C. M. 1984. A manual of chemical and biological methods for seawater analysis. New York. Pergamon Press, 173 pp. Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 155 Pearson, T. H.; Rosenberg, R. 1978. Macrobenthic succession in relation to organic enrichment and pollution of the marine environment. Oceanog. Mar. Biol. Ann. Rev. 16: 229-311. Poindexter-Rollings, M. E. 1990. Methodology for analysis of subaqueous sediment mounds. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, MS. Technical Report D-90- 2. 110pages + appendix. Revelas, E. C.; Germano, J. D.; Rhoads, D. C. 1987. REMOTS® reconnaissance of benthic environments. Coastal Zone '87 Seattle, May 1987. Rhoads, D. C.; Germano, J. D. 1982. Characterization of organism-sediment relations using sediment-profile imaging: An effective method of Remote Ecological Monitoring of the Seafloor (REMOTS® System). Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 8:115-128. Rhoads, D. C.; Germano, J. D. 1986. Interpreting long-term changes in community structure: A new protocol. Hydrobiologia 142:291-308. SAI. 1980. Disposal Area Monitoring System Annual Report - 1980. Volume I Physical Measurements. DAMOS Contribution No. 17, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New England Division, Waltham, MA. SAIC. 1985. Standard operating procedure manual for DAMOS monitoring activities: volume I and volume II. DAMOS Contribution No. 48 (SAIC Report No. SAIC- 85/7516&C48). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New England Division, Waltham, MA. SAIC. 1988. A summary of DAMOS physical monitoring of dredged material disposal activities. SAIC Report No. SAIC-88/7527 C71. Submitted to U.S. Army Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS. April 1988. SAIC. 1990a. Monitoring cruise at the New London Disposal Site, July 1987. DAMOS Contribution No. 66 (SAIC Report No. SAIC-88/7511&C66). US Army Corps of Engineers, New England Division, Waltham, MA. SAIC. 1990b. Capping survey at the New London Disposal Site, February 3, 1989. DAMOS Contribution No. 71 (SAIC Report No. SAIC-89/7554-C76). US Army Corps of Engineers, New England Division, Waltham, MA. Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 156 SAIC. 1990c. Monitoring cruise at the New London Disposal Site, August 1988. DAMOS Contribution No. 77 (SAIC Report No. SAIC-89/7557&C77). US Army Corps of Engineers, New England Division, Waltham, MA. SAIC. 1995a. Sediment capping of subaqueous dredged material disposal mounds: an overview of the New England experience. DAMOS Contribution No. 95. (SAIC Report No. SAIC-90/7573&C84). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New England Division, Waltham, MA. SAIC. 1995b. Monitoring cruise at the New London Disposal Site, June 1991. DAMOS Contribution No. 96 (SAIC Report No. SAIC-92/7622&C101). US Army Corps of Engineers, New England Division, Waltham, MA. Silva, A. J.; Brandes, H. G.; Uchytil, C. J.; Fredette, T. J.; Carey, D. A. 1994. Geotechnical analysis of capped dredged material mounds. In: McNair, E.C. Jr. (ed.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Dredging and Dredged Material Placement, Vol. I. Lake Buena Vista, FL., Nov 13-16, 1994. Amer. Soc. Civ. Eng., New York, pp. 411-419. Strickland, J. D. H.; Parsons, T. R. 1972. A practical handbook of seawater analysis. Fisheries Resources Board Canadian Bulletin. 167 pp. Tyson, R. V.; Pearson, T. H. 1991. Modern and ancient continental shelf anoxia: an overview. In: Tyson, R. V. and T. H. Pearson (Eds.) Modern and ancient shelf anoxia. Geological Society of London, Special Publication # 58, London. 470 pp. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), New England District. 1982. Final programmatic environmental impact statement for the disposal of dredged material in the Long Island Sound region. Waltham, MA. U.S. Navy. 1973. Revised Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Dredge River Channel, Naval Submarine Base, New London, CT. May 1973. U.S. Navy. 1975. Environmental survey of effects of dredging and spoil disposal, New London, CT. First Year’s Studies July 1974-July 1975. Vol. 3 of Supplement to FEIS, Dredge River Channel, Naval Submarine Base, New London, Groton, CT. Prepared by U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, Northeast Region, Middle Atlantic Coastal Fisheries Center, Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 157 Waddel, E. V.; Hamilton, P.; Carey, D. A.; Morris, J. T.; Kincaid, C.; Daleo, W. 1999. Observations of physical oceanographic conditions at the New London Disposal Site, 1997-1998. SAIC Report No. 453. Draft report submitted to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New England District, Concord, MA. Wentworth, C. K. (1922). A scale of grade and class terms of clastic sediments. J. Geo. 30:377-390. Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998 Seem Aen ed Als acutd. cae ES) SS ee ie ee Golf. a Aloo n lscorettl' A bite: Sy i 19Sp ied dimenr capping OF submenus daeiaien: timate tal: repeal xooanes SAK. IF US, Ralraipistation: Nationald | Arty f he yess of Bing an ven oh a ie wean pecs ASK ES ERC AOS dion te somaersvertiome ander MN fst bad a ohh | UHOGP WOR HCE Wablave dai TAS .RCCr-TROE AM .trooteD Johari bash wol ersenigndl To ag er AE CHS! YoY ec ee wae Re oor re NG, SAK, Kor ace. @ hime ne fg pry of a aig’ a Amen Wattham, MA a0. " ; a er és Vs, wiler b.. Ae. M Ue} ryt, {, ¥ m By fay Carey, Bs ‘i ; ; Castectod | of Ganped Sree ara coonnds; fn! McWNairi Bi ; feel yy Pr uy! the Second aameminnel ee onfarence on Dodging af Dredeod Material Placimeat: Yok. if Lake Bena Vity Bs sid Amer, Soc, Civ. Bag, ‘New Yo het we ee ee ie i. Highere: Re OMT eer) Cai Basin, 67 isan ty is 5 Pears th oe Mode Hitt archon 6 nse yyerrtiene’y rl b mi He ": ee PALM ids.) ‘ie hen eee ati* hy A *, i ia te diva a t sRipeeia sii by _ peteoonaaara the weno ine nak . nk set OR ry Lhac A fee me par nat: sia ¢ Navy. 1974. Rey vibe Dewi Karvinnoentad Navel & sbnatine, ite Neti it ) ere y 197 yy “Bing vitoruenetia asp here o,f Cr. First: Your’ is _ FEMS, Doodge River Chax wh bison Prepared by U8 Departmemr gts filpasia. Conceal Fiabe: e INDEX aerobic, 26 anoxia, 24, 156 azoic, 126 barge, xiii, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 82, 141, 142, 144, 145, 149 disposal, 149 benthos, xiii, xiv, 1, 6, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 22, 23, 24, 26, 33, 42, 48, 62, 67, 72, 76, 82, 90, 98, 100, 106, 110, 115, 122, 125, 126, 128, 129, 134, 136, 138, 139, 140, 141, 144, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 1524153), 155 ampeliscids, 26, 62, 82, 85, 110, 137, 154 amphipod, 11, 26, 62, 72, 76, 82, 85, 94, 106, 110, 119, 125, 126, 128, 135, 136, 137, 140, 141, 146, 154 bivalve, 26 deposit feeder, 11, 26, 62, 125, 128 macro-, 24, 26, 153, 155 mussels, 135 polychaete, 11, 26 bioturbation, 26, 135, 137 feeding void, 119, 130, 139 foraging, 26, 136 boundary roughness, 22, 24, 62, 72, 76, 85, 94, 100, 106, 119, 125, 126, 128, 129, 136, 146 buoy, 3, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 16, 28, 44, 48, 55, 67, 90, 98, 106, 110, 115, 122, 133, 134, 138, 139, 141, 144, 149, 151 disposal, 3, 4, 8, 9, 10, 16, 98, 144 taut-wire moored, 4 capping, 3, 4, 8, 9, 11, 13, 28, 44, 82, 138, ADA SAS 49 ol >So Ds 156 circulation, 135, 137 colonization, 138 conductivity, 19 consolidation, 12, 48, 141 containment, 3, 4, 147 contaminant New England River Basin Commission (NERBC), 3, 154 CTD meter, 19, 40, 41 currents, 4, 26, 119, 135, 136, 140, 144, 149 speed, 136 decomposition, 136, 148 density, 19, 22, 40, 85, 119 deposition, 1, 8, 10, 16, 33, 98, 115, 135, 136, 140, 146, 148, 149 dispersive site Cornfield Shoals (CSDS), 3 disposal site Central Long Island Sound (CLIS), 3, 134, 154 Cornfield Shoals (CSDS), 3 New London (NLDS), xii, xiv, 1, 2, 3, ASS O98. 9p LOM 12. ASA 4s Ss 16; 18, 19, 20, 21, 26, 33, 36, 39, 42, 44, 55, 62, 67, 82, 90, 110, 115, 122, 125, 129! 13351345185, 1365 18721885 141, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, S22 SS elS4 S55 london Western Long Island Sound (WLIS), 154 dissolved oxygen (DO), xiii, 10, 11, 26, 40, 41, 42, 67, 72, 82, 90, 94, 98, 106, 119, 125, 126, 129, 130, 136, 137, 149, 150, IS erosion, 26, 128, 135, 140 feeding void, 119, 130, 139 fish, 154 fisheries, 156 grain size, 22, 24, 55, 67, 76, 85, 100, 106, 119, 122° 12551268128 16m habitat, xi, 22, 26, 33, 42, 11O0;122128; 129, 138, 153 hydroids, 128, 135 hypoxia, xiv, 26, 42, 136, 137, 153 methane, 26, 27, 67, 72, 90, 98, 106, 119, WSS, WAG, WAL), KO, SiC eI National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 21, 156 New England River Basin Commission (NERBC), 3, 154 oxidation, 136 recolonization, xiv, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 22, 42, 48, 67, 76, 82, 90, 98, 137, 138, 139, 141, 146, 148, 150, 152 reference area, xiv, 10, 11, 12, 14, 33, 39, 40, 42, 85, 90, 106, 122, 125, 126, 128, 129; 18091337134, 13591367137, 138; 139, 140, 141, 144, 146, 148, 149, 150, 151 reference station, 11, 62, 76, 106, 122, 125, 126, 134, 136 REMOTS®, xiii, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 22, 230 DAs 26) 2128530; 61e 32) 33934530. 37, 38, 39; 42, 48, 55, 62,67, 72, 76, 82, 90, 94, 98, 100, 106, 115, 122, 125, 126, 128, 129, 133, 134, 136, 138, 139, 140, 144, 146, 147, 149, 150, 151, 152, 155 boundary roughness, 22, 24, 62, 72, 76, 85, 94, 100, 106, 119, 125, 126, 128, 129, 136, 146 Organism-Sediment Index (OSI), 8, 22, 26, 44, 48, 67, 72, 82, 85, 94, 98, 100, 10S 11951255 12651293 1S OMS se 139, 141, 144, 146, 149 redox potential discontinuity (RPD), 22, Soa sediment-profile camera, 23, 82, 106, NS) 5 WA WA), As. 22) REMOTS®®, 26, 67 Organism-Sediment Index (OSI), 26, 67 RPD redox potential discontinuity (RPD), 26 REMOTS®, redox potential discontinuity (RPD), 22, 24, 26, 27, 62, 67, 72, 76, 82, 85, 94, 100, 110, 1125S 126s 12829 MISA 55 137, 139, 141, 144, 149 REMOTS®®, redox potential discontinuity (RPD), 26, 125 salinity, 40 sediment chemistry, 33 clay, 25, 55, 67, 76, 94, 1G0, 106, 115, 119, 122, 126, 146 cobble, 25 gravel, 25, 119 sand, 6, 9, 25, 55, 62, 67, 72, 76, 85, 94, 100, 106, 115, 119, 122, 125, 126, 128, 129, 135, 136, 138, 139, 140, 146, 149, 150 silt, 25, 55, 67, 76, 94, 100, 106, 119, 122, 125, 126, 129, 139, 140, 146, 149 transport, 26 shore station, 16 species dominance, 24, 55, 72, 119, 129, 139, 146 stratigraphy, 55, 76, 85, 106, 119, 122, 129, 136, 146 succession, 155 pioneer stage, 11, 26 successional stage, 22, 24, 26, 67, 72, 82, 85, 100, 125, 130, 139, 150 survey baseline, 13, 33, 44, 110, 115, 125, 133, 146, 151 bathymetry, xiii, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 44, 48, 62, FONOSs OM oI 22 133.1 34a 4ie 144, 146, 151, 152, 154 REMOTS8®,, xiv, 9, 26, 28, 55, 152 temperature, 19 tide, 21, 135, 140, 149 topography, 4, 10, 12, 16, 21, 44, 90, 110, 115, 133, 134, 140 toxicity, 150 trace metals vanadium (V), 11, 153, 156, 157 trawling, 24, 136 trough, 110, 134 turbulence, 136 waves, 4, 21, 24, 135, 140 winnowing, 76, 85, 106, 136, 146, 148, 150 Pei Void, 1 19, 130, 1A9 Pah 144 Rehories, 156 gras sive 22, 24, 53, 67/76, BS 100, 106. p16, 12% 12521226, 128. tag 4a) hatbin, wth 22 2G).8%) 42, 10, AD OB Wi 29. (33, } 1S by: iret. 1 of, eee lyponia, tiv, 36, 42096, T2053 \ erutthiane,: 26,27, 7, 7 125, 120, TAR, VIO 137, Tae Nationa! Oscanic and Atino ve it) AMmoinintration (DAA), 2109 56. 08 | New Enghokd River Bast So on shee } (NERBCY, 3; 134). ak icixtiont) i at ¥en pepe xiv, Ltd, 42, 48. 67,76, 82, 00.982 bat; ae 148, {5G 752" teferenice seea, Ki0,10; B hee tuky 44: sp ue 40, : i. ‘85, 90, 106, 122. 125, sr 18), NDS, Dat, 453; (34, WAS CGT R7, aR PAG Lad, 149, 144, M6) 148, 28, ey if P _fekermace sation Phys2 a6; 106, yan an ith, 126, 434; 136 REMAN, xiii U0 Us 19, A 25: 28. TG PF 728; 30. 2 Bly: Bay 33, u; 6, 97,8, 3 42, 48, 35, 62,67, 92, By | 0) Pa, HR, 400, 106) 118, 122,008); 16, “128, 1PM) GRD, 194,136, LRT IONE 144; 146, 147, 149, 150, 151 A SeaBhocbbrek HeASeuibn Maa 72, 90, 98, 106,119, PPD PCP RED SSE SLE OLE. . ou am bag ati Me 1. f i ie 2 Seb it 95 ame | i eh 94, Malin ho eee a ' SOpm HMM? Ov Seve a anit eeetiniayst init 6, 44-48, 67, 72, yin 140, 149, 12-29 del eae 3 ie as RO BK Sh, py ts ; ett a alg e VTS. 122, 125, 728, FIER west ‘aban Bi eare sltlax wy rv phen frre ese Y - dia uty ae 7 FR: T6, B2 SSS re LS, 126, CPs, Ob, at sont th ae #2 f godine | wloiaistry, 94) ” clay, 25, 55, 67, 16; SF PPO 122,126, hs Sofa a5 Ob satin i: 9) 25. $5, a2, OP; 100; 106) 15,4 oe 128, 129, 135, 136 uy 146,149, 1500" wits, 24, 58, ie 16/9, .5 Appendix A Disposal Logs Al 1991-92 Disposal Season SLE sv3 B14 SLE nos 02 009 sva 0€ oss 92 009 aS RcTd 00L nos 02 ose M-S 08 ,00L SL IMS OL SZ SMS Ob «P OSb UOREIS-HO 00 SLS UONE}S-HO 001 009 UORE}S-HO 001 00L UOREIS-HO 00 008 UOREIS-HO 001 009 UORE}S-HO 001 UOREIS-HO Aonqy ees p 6cS'P €cS'p 60S'p 60S b 8IS'b cls b css L6r'b 60S'F SL UOREIS-HO beep ost UOREIS-HO bSeP Ost UOREIS-HO LLeP oSt UONEIS-HO Lee Ost as Ol 2OPb ost as Sb Be ost as OL COb Pb Ost Sv4 Ol Leb ost Sv3 Ol €9EF OS} sva OL bbb ost 3S Sb GLE F ost sv4 Ol LPP ost Svw3 Ol Leb OSt 3S Ol ZOPP Ost nos OL Obb F ost a-s 1G B6E'P ost nos 10L Sbb'b ost Nos OL Sbbb ost as OF C084 ost nos Ol 28E°b el (ah cl cl cL cL cL cL (ah aL cL el cl cL cL cL eL el cl cL el cl cL él cL zl eZ cL (ah cL cL (ae cL cl cL cL oll ZH WON JE JEO}eW BJULIN WO, jeJOL ePA 7H VON JE [EOJeW ONUCIN HOd |ejOL 0291 91291 p02 91 20291 02°91 Z6L9L 8L'OL 86191 60291 20291 oll LA VON Je JEOJeW I)}ULIN WO, |ejOL A _b# VON 38 Je}a}eW DNUeIN HO, /2}01 9S}'9t Z22'9h 8819 cool oor ce 9b Op ot ZLp OL cee Ob 92p'9t SPE OL 61h 9b SPE ol ge'91 Leor 9e'9OL g99e°91 9e°91 QE 91 Spe ol eSeol ZOE OL cSe ot eSe Or cer OL S9e91 uiwBuo} BapBuoy ujwne} bP be bP bp by bp lp el Z7# WON Je [eLE,eyy CULE JOW UBMD |e}0OL ePA Z# VGN Je [e19;eW BupeW JOW UMD [e}01 by bp bb bp bp by be oY 18 VON 28 [B6}e Wj CULE JOW UOMD |B}0L ePA b# VON 38 Jee;eW BUpeW JOW UMD 12}01 by bP be be bP lb be bp bP be bb be bp bp te be bp bp bP bp oooooococe oooooo°o ooooooocooocococoooc0co0c ooo Bape piz Ww Song WON ey) Je peysodeg (ejs9)eWy JO EUINJOA [e}0) «PA SAoNg WON e4} Je pay|sodeg je}Ja}eW JO EUINJOA Je}0L SSL6Eb 9GLEEP SSL6Eb SSL6Eb SSL6Eb ySL6Eb eGleer SSL6EP SSL6Eb SSL6Eb VSL6Eb OGLEEP SSL6Ep 0 0 0 0 LOL6Eb 8 9L6Ep 99L6EF 6 9L6Eb bOL6Eb 6 9OL6Er pOl6ep G9L6Ep G9OL6Eb S9L6E¢ b9OL6Eb S9L6EF G9L6Eb bOl6Ep S'9L6Eb G9OL6Ep S9OL6EP G9OL6Eb 8 OL6EP G9l6Eb py oooooococaoe 9 PEL9z 0) oooo 000 QEEL9Z 8 El19z 6G ee19z 8 EEL9z bperoe bPelLoe peor f vELoe SB EE192 Z PELOS? peEelge CS vELOZ f vELoz bpeLge S veloc bPELoe SPeloe GS PELoz PEeElge vEL9e pix oO ooooooce ooooo0o oo oooooo0ocococooc0oocococo0co 9c 00 eyepdsip 16-98-21 16-98Q-L1 46-98-01 16-98Q-60 46-98-20 +6-989-90 +6-98Q-20 b6-AON-22 16-989-90 L6-AON-22 b6-AON-92 }6-AON-SZ }6-AON-E2 }6-AON-22 }6-AON-bZ }6-AON-02 }6-AON-61 SIN SQN SG1N SIN SGN SCI1N SIN SGIN SQ1N SGIN SGIN SGN SGIN SGN SIN SIN SIN OILNVIN LYOd SILNVIN LYOd OILNVIN LYOd OILNVIN LYOd SILNVIN LYOd OILNVIN LYOd OILNVIN LYOd OILNVIN LYOd VNINVW YOW NSM9 VNINVW YOW NSM9 OILNVIN LYOd OILNVIN LYOd OILNVIN LYOd OILNVIN LYOd SILNVIN LYOd SILNVIN LYOd OILNVIN LYOd “ONIOILNVIN LYOd “ONIOILNVIN LYOd “ONI OILNVIN LYOd “ONT OILNVIN LYOd “ONT OLLNVIN LYOd “ONI ‘OILNVIN LYOd “ONT OILNVIN LYOd “ONT OILNVIN LYOd VNIYVW YOW NSM9 VNINVW YOW NSM9 Aong Z# VAN “ONT OLLNVIN LYOd “ONT OLLNVIN LYOd “ONT 'OILLNVIN LYOd “ON OILNVIN LYOd “ONT ‘OILNVIN LYOd “ONI ‘OILNVIN LYOd “ONT OILNVIN LYOd }6-AON-92 16-AON-02 }6-AON-61 }6-AON-BL }6-AON-SL }6-AON-SI }6-AON-ZL +6-AON-80 +6-AON-90 16-490-S2 $6190-be 1690-2 16-190-€2 16190-12 46-90-61 46-90-61 +6-190-Z1 16-190-91 16-190-S1 16190-+L eaedsip SQN SGN SIN SGN SQN SGIN SC1N SGN SG1N SGN SGN SIN SGN SGIN SGN SQN SQIN SG1N SGIN SGIN VNINVW YOW NSM9 VNINVN YOW N3M9 VNINVN YOW NSM9 VNINVW HOW NSM9 VNINVW YOW NSM9 VNINVAW HOW NSMO VNINVW YOW NSM9 VNIYVW YOW NSM9 VNIMVW YOW NSM9 VNIYVA YOW NS3M9 VNIYVW HOW NSM9 VNINVA YOW NAM9 VNINVW HOW NSM9 VNINVW YOW NSM9 VNINVW YOW NSM9 VNINVW HOW NAM9 VNINVW YOW NSM9 VNINVW YOW NSM9 VNINVW YOW NSM9 VNINVW YOW NSM9 yoefoid VNINVA HOW NSM9 VNIYVW HOW NSM9 VNINVW YOW NSM9 VNINVI HOW NAM9 VNINVW HOW NAM9 VNINVW YOW NSM9 VNINVW HOW NSM9 VNINVW HOW NAM9 VNINVW YOW NAMO VNINVAW YOW NSM9 VNINVW YOW NSM9 VNINVW YOW NAM9 VNIYVW YOW NSM9 VNINV HOW NSM9 VNINVA YOW NSM9 VNINVW YOW NSM9 VNINVW YOW NSM9 VNIYVW HOW NSM9 VNINVW YOW NSM9 VNINVW YOW NSM9 Aong 1# WGN ee}|uWed Aong VGN 24} 10) pajyabuey jeuajyeyy pabpaig cll [EL1OJBW S/G JO OUINJOA BJO} sPA [BH93eW S/d 40 OUINJOA Je}OL 0002 ZS9°L 00S Sty 00S Ely Py 0SP v 0SP v 00S + 00S ¥ OSL L9P'P 00F + 0Sl L9b'y SY Y SV Y Ov ¥ cW WGN 12301 ePA WON 18301 0€ L6r'P 0c S8P'P 02 S8P'P 09 69°F S 6LS°P ib S8b'P GS LLYY OE ELb'Y St LSD iS 68h 0€ SOP'P cv 08 8SP'P oF cl cL cl cl cl ZLI 9b E91 OL 9L'OL SOL'OL 9L'OL Aonqy ulw6uo; Baphuo; uiwye} ly LY LY bY by Bapye| pz ooooo0ocoocoooqo0co ooooo0ocoocoeoo ooooo0ooqooeocoeoo G'SL6EP GSL6EP S'SL6Er SLEEP VEeLeer co GL6EP bSZ6Ep ¢SL6EP SLEEP SLEEP co GL6EP bSL6EP 0 SLEEP 0 pyA 9 PELOS G'PELOe G'vELOC cf VEL? 9'PELOZ P'PELOTS €'vELIe € veloc b'pELO? PPELo? 0 So VELOC 0 0 0 GellpL cé6-uer-GL 0 c6-uer-pL VCLLbL c6-UeL-EL c6-Uef-cL c6-UEL- LL c6-uef-OL c6-Uer-60 c6-Uer-80 c6-uer-20 c6-UeL-90 c6-uer-SO c6-UeL-H0 c6-UeP-€0 ooooo0oococo9o 46-99Q-Zl 16-98Q-b 1 16-99-01 16-99-60 16-99-60 16-98-80 16-99-80 +6-99q-20 16-99-20 16-98-90 oooooo0ceooe°c eo 16-990-90 +6-99Q-S0 16-98-70 16-998q-€0 16-98-20 Y3AIY SSANVHL YAY SANVHL Y3AIY SANVHL YSAIY SSAWVHL YaAlY SSWVHL YaAlYd SAWVHL Y3AIY SSAWWHL Y3AlY SAWVHL Y3AIY SANVHL Y3SAlY SSANVHL USAIN SANVHL YaAlY SAWVHL YSAIY SAWVHL SGIN YOSYVH NOLONINOLS SGIN YOSYVH NOLONINOLS SGIN YOSYVH NOLONINOLS SGIN YOSdVH NOLONINOLS SGIN YOSYuVH NOLONINOLS SGIN YOSYVH NOLONINOLS SG1N YOSYVH NOLONINOLS SGIN YOSYVH NOLONINOLS SGIN YOSYVH NOLONINOLS SGIN YOSYVH NOLONINOLS SG1N Y3SAlY SAWVHL SG1N Y3aAlY SANVHL SQN YSAIY SAWVHL SIN YsAlY SAWVHL SGN YsaAlYd SAWVHL ayepdsip eaedsip yoafoud Aong S/q 24} 403 payabuey jeluajzeyy pobpaig WOIWSHOD MOG WOINSHOD MOG IWOIW3SHS MOG WOINSHOD MOG WOIWSHO MOG WOIWSHO MOG WOIWSHO MOG WOINSHO MOG TWOINWSHOD MOG WOINWSHOD MOG WOIWSHD MOG WOINWSHOD MOG WOIWAHOD MOG WGD punowW S/d NOLONINOLS 40 NMOL NOLONINOLS 40 NMOL NOLONINOLS 40 NMOL NOLONINOLS 4O NMOL NOLONINOLS 40 NMOL NOLONINOLS 40 NMOL NOLONINOLS 30 NMOL NOLONINOLS 40 NMOL NOLONINOLS 40 NMOL NOLONINOLS 30 NMOL Wan Ppunow s/d WOINSHO MOG WOINSHO MOG TWOINWSHS MOG WOINSHO MOG WOINAHO MOG Wan punow s/d 9a))luWWad A2 1992-93 Disposal Season ZS‘OrLp —-« W- PUNOW ZG-N AU} Je payisodap jevayew “Aly enBoydjed |e}01 00z9 «PA _punow Z6-1N 24} Je Paysodep jevayew “Ary anBoyoed [2}01 SGA Ob E0ESZOBO'ZZ- ESLBZIZZ ly EB/E/P MOONSLSAM JO NMOL 09620z661 YAAIY SNDOHOLVd 00°0€ ZOESOOBO'ZZ- LISLEQZZ Ly eE/E/E MOOUSLSAM JO NMOL 09620z661 YAAIY SNDOHOLVd O0'Or LELE080'2@Z- SBrOZZ IY e6/Z/E YOONSLSAM JO NMOL 09620z661 YSAIY SNDOHOLVd 00°0S Z6bS080'%Z- S866SZZ7 1h E6/L/E MOOUSLSAM JO NMOL 09620z661 USA ANDOHOLVd 00'Or LELE080'Z/- SBPOOZZ ly e6/2z/z MOOUSLSAM JO NMOL 09620Z661 YAAIY SNDOHOLVd 00°0S Z61S080'2/- S866SZZ 1p €6/92/z MOONSLSAM JO NMOL 09620Z661 YAAIY SNDOHOLVd 00'Or Z6L€080'2Z- GBrOZZ ly eB/Sz/z MOOUELSSM JO NMOL 096202661 YAAIY SNDOHOLVd 00'Ob E0ESZOBO'ZZ- EBLEZIL7 ly 6/Sz/Z MOOUELSSM JO NMOL 096z0z661 YAAIY SNDOHOLVd 00°0S €0ESPO8O'ZZ- EBLEZOLZ IY EE/EzIZ MOOUSLSAM 4O NMOL 096z20z661 YSAIY SNDOHOLVd 00'OF €OESZO80'CZ- EBLBCOLT LY ECb6/L7/e MOOUELSAM AO NMOL 096202661 YSAlIY ANDOHOLVWd ye7 ajyeqsiq eysdsiq SeyIWWEd UWNUJIWEY el PUNOW Z6-N Ou) Je paysodap jevayew Anen S/N [e}OL ePA_punow Z6-1N eu) Je paysodap jeveyew AAeN SN 12101 00'Ob E0ESZOBO'ZZ- EBLBZOLZ Ih E6/6L/Z V4 IWAVN “AIG ‘HLYON ‘AAVN SN €0Z100661 NOTIN ‘ASVEENs IWAVN 00°02 696986L0'7/- LLSSEOLZ Lh EG/LL/Z V4 IWAVN “AIG ‘HLYON ‘AAWN SN €0210066! NON ‘SSVEENs IWAVN 00°02 696166L0'2Z- EBLELOLT LY EG/LL/Z WA IWAVN “AIG ‘HLYON ‘AAVN SN €0Z100661 NON ‘ASVEENS IWAVN IW b/L ZOESOO8O'ZZ- LIGLEQLZZ Lh E6/OL/Z V4 IWAVN “AIG ‘HLYON ‘AAWN SN €02100661 NON ‘ASVEENs IWAVN L€°0 ZOEGOO80'CZ- LIGLEOZZ Le €6/9/2 V4 TIWAVN “AIG ‘(HLYON ‘AAVN SM €0ZL0066l NOTIN ‘SSVaans IWAVN ye7 gjeqsiq eysdsig BayIW8d WNU}IWWIY el PUNOW ZG-IN je poy!sodap JEHaye/y SAOD PsojwNWY jeyOL epA punowW Z6-N }e poyisodap JELayeYWy SAOD PsojUNWy je}OL | OSZ a-N IWS 9I9€€h20'Cl- SSB6EE9Z lb Zé/0Z/01 SCN NOILVIDOSSV SAO0 GYOANNW Sc2900¢661 AAOO0 QHOAWNW 00€ a-N IWS 9L9ElPL0'CL- SS8PPE9C lh CE/9L/01 SCN NOILVIDOSSV SAO0 GHOANNW S2900¢661 AAOO0 QHOAWNNW Gle a-N INS SL9ELPLO'CL- SSBPHE9C lb C6/SL/OL SCN NOILVIDOSSV SAO9 GHYOAWNW S29002661 AAOO GYOANNW OSZé a-N IWS’ 9L9€6EZ0'C2- SGSBHLOLZ 1b CE/SL/OL SCIN NOILVIDOSSV SAO0 GHOAWNW Sz9002661 AAOO0 QHOANNW Gle a-N IWS’ 6Y69CPVLO'CL- BBLEQE9C 1b ZE/SL/OL SCIN NOILVIDOSSV SAO0 GHOAWNW Sc900¢661 AAOO GYOAWNW Glé a-N IWS’ 6Y690PZ0'2L- B8BL89697 lb Zé6/PL/OL SCIN NOILVIDOSSV SAO0 GHOANNW Sc9002661 AAOO GHOAWNW OS/ I-N WIG” E8COSHLO'CL- CCG9BE9C Lh CE6/ZL/OL SCN NOILVIDOSSV SAO0 GHOAWNW Sz9002661 AAOO GYOAWNW ajeqsiq eysdsiq ye] BOWIWIId winujWdad punow @6-1N z obey el PUNOW ZG-N Ou) je payisodeq awnjo, peyodey je}o, ePA_punow Z6-7N ey} Je payisodaq awinjo, payodey je}01 el PUNOW ZG-]N Ou) }e Payisodap jevayew saAry daaq jejo! epA punow Z6-1N au) }e poysodap jevayew sanny deaq je}o) 0S6 O08¢ SGAOl 69611080'2Z- EB8L809L2 lb e6/Z/r SGN ONI VNINVW YSAIY da5d 80201066! YsAlY d3a3qd 008 OOE SCA 02 6961 1080'2Z- ESLBO9LZ Lb E6/OE/E SCN ONI VNINVW YSAIY d330 802010661 Y3AIY dad 006 OLE SQAOE ZELE080'72- SB8POOLZ 1h E6/EZ/E SG1N ONI VNINVW YSAIY da5d 802010661 Y3AAIYM dad 006 O0€ SGA OE 21080°22- c809L72 LY E6/LC/E SGN ONI VNINVW YSAIY d55d 802010661 YSAlY dG 006 OO€ SCAGZ 696986L0'22- LISOEOLZ Lh EB/9Z/E SGIN ONI VNINVW YSAIY d5a350 802010661 Y3AAIY d330 0S6 OOE SGAOE 2OESO080'ZZ- LISLEOLZ Lh E6/SZ/E SGN ONI VNINVW YSAIY daad 802010661 Y3SAIY d33d 006 O82 SGAOE 696LL080'2Z- EBLB809LZ Ib E6/PZ/E SG1N ONI VNIMVI YSAIY d535G 802010661 Y3SAIY dad 008 OO€ SGA SZ? EOESZOBO'2Z- EBLEZOLZ IP EB/Ez/E SGN ONI VNINVW YSAIY dad 802010661 YSAI d3a3aG 0S9 O8¢ SGASI cOESON80'CZ- LISLEOZZ Ly e6/Zz/€e SGIN ONIVNIYVW YSAIY da5d0 802010661 YaAlY daad Aongsiq ye7 ajeqsiq osysdsig Sdo}IWAdg WNUj}IWaYg ce PUNOW ZG-N OU} Je Pay!sodap jeUa}EW! JULIO SJOlld [EOL ePA_punow Z6-7N up ye poy!sodap jeUa}eW JUIOd SOI [E}OL ose OL%@ SGAG €E0ESZOBO'ZZ- EBLEZOZZ IY EB/EL/E SGN ONI VNINVN LNIOd SLOTMd 0S9108861 WNIMVW LNIOd S.LOld 008 OLE SGASL ZOESOOBO'ZZ- LISLESZZ Ly EeE/ZL/e SQN ONI VNINVNW LNIOd SLOTd OS9108861 WNINWW INIOd S.LOTld 002 OLE SGAGL ZOESOOBO'ZZ- ZISLEOZZ IY E6/OL/E SQIN ONI VNINVW LNIOd SLOTNd OS9L0886! WNINVIN LNIOd S.LOTld 00z OL€ SGAOL ZOESOO8O'ZZ- LISLESZZ Ly Ee6/OL/E SIN ONI VNINVW LNIOd SLOTd OS9108861 WNIYNVIN LNIOd S.LOTld 008 OLE SGAOE ZOESO080'ZZ- LIGLEQZZ Ly E6/E/E SCN ONI VNINVW LNIOd SLOTd OS9108861 WNINVW LNIOd S.LONd 0s8 OZ€ SGA OE ZOES008O'ZZ- LIGLEQZZ Ly EG/B/E SQ1N ONI VNINVW LNIOd SLOTd 0S9108861 WNINVW LNIOd S.LOTd 0S8 SHM__ SGA 02 SE98/620'22- EBLEBSLZ 1h E6/Z/E ONIVNINVIA LNIOd SLOM1ld OS9L0886 VYWNINVW LNIOd S.LOTd Aongsiqg 7e7 ajyeqsiq oayisdsiq eaylwiead wnujWwied A3 1993-94 Disposal Season (No Disposal Reported) A4 1994-95 Disposal Season Dredged Material Targeted for the NDA 94 Buoy Permittee DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 Pernnittee DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17 Project THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVCR THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER Project THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER THAMES RIVER Oisparea NLDS NLDS NLOS NLDS NLDS NLDS NLOS NLDS NLDS NLDOS NLDS NLDS NLDS NLDS Disparea NLDS NLDS NLDS NLDS NLOS NLDS NLOS NLDS NLDS NLDS NLDS NLDS NLDS NLDS NLDS NLDS NLDS NLDS NLDS NLDS NLOS NLDS NLDS NLDS NLDS NLDS NLOS NLDS NLDS NLDS NLDS NLDS NLDS NLDS NLDS NLDS NLDS NLDS NLDS NLDS NLDS Dispdate 26-Dec-94 27-Dec-94 27-Dec-94 28-Dec-94 28-Dec-94 29-Dec-94 30-Dec-94 30-Dec-94 31-Dec-94 2-Jan-95 3-Jan-95 4Jan-95 S-Jan-95 S-Jan-95 Dispdate 17-Jan-95 17-Jan-95 18-Jan-95 18-Jan-95 19-Jan-95 19-Jan-95 20-Jan-95 20-Jan-95 21-Jan-95 23-Jan-95 24-Jan-95 24-Jan-95 24-Jan-95 25-Jan-95 25-Jan-95 26-Jan-95 26-Jan-95 27-Jan-95 27-Jan-95 27-Jan-95 28-Jan-95 30-Jan-95 31-Jan-95 31-Jan-95 1-Feb-95 2-Feb-95 2-Feb-95 3-Feb-95 3-Feb-95 4-Feb-95 7-Feb-95 8-Feb-95 8-Feb-95 8-Feb-95 9-Feb-95 9-Feb-95 11-Feb-95 13-Feb-95 13-Feb-95 14-Feb-95 14-Feb-95 Lat deg Lat min Long Deg Long Min DisBuoy DirBuoy CYVol 30° Ww 850 30° Ww 850 7s Ss 850) 30° Ww 850) 30° Ww 850) uy S) 850) 75° Ss 850) 7s S) 850) 40' Ss 850) 75° Ss 750 50° SE 700) 80° S 700 65° S 850) 65° S 700 Total Pier 17 UDM at the NDA 94 Buoy yd? 11350} Total Pier 17 UDM at the NDA 94 Buoy m? _—8678.21 Lat deg Lat min Long Deg Long Min DisBuoy DirBuoy CYVol 40° E 900 50° SW 900 30° Ss 900 20° SE 900 30° S) 900) 20° Ss 900 50’ Ss 900) 50° SE 900 90° SE 900! 50° S) 900) 50' SSE 900 40° SW 900 40° Ss 900} 50° Ss 900] 30° Ss 900 60' Ss 900) 50° SE 900 70° SSW 900) 50° Ss 900) 90" Ss 900) 90° Ss 900) 70' S 900) 50° Ss 900 60° SE 900) 50° SE 900 75 SW 900 100° Ss 900) 100° cS) 900) 100° Ss 900 100° Ss 900 300° Ss 900 300° SSE 900) 300° Ss 900 300° Ss 900 300° Ss 900 200° S) 900) 100 Ss 900) 75 Ss 900 75 S) 900) 300° SSW 900 300° Ss 900) Total Pier 17 CDM at the NDA 94 Buoy yd? 68278: Total Pier 17 CDM at the NDA 94 Buoy m? 52205. Total Volume of Matenal deposited at the NDA 94 Buoy m? 79628. Total Volume of Matenal deposited at the NDA 94 Buoy yd? 60883.7 Dredged Material Targeted for the USCG Buoy Permittee a a US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 10-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 10-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 10-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 10-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 11-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 11-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 11-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 11-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 12-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 12-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 12-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 13-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 13-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 13-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 14-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 14-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 14-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 15-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 15-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 18-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 18-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 18-Jan-95 Total Eagle Pier UDM at the USCG Buoy yd? Total Eagle Pier UDM at the USCG Buoy m?_ 43352.8 a Lat min US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 18-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 18-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 19-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 19-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 19-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 19-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 19-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 20-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 20-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 20-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 21-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 21-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 21-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 21-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 22-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 22-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 22-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 22-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 23-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 23-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 23-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 23-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 24-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 24-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 24-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 24-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 24-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 25-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 25-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 25-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 25-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 26-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 26-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 26-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 26-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 27-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 27-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 27-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 28-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 28-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 28-Jan-95 US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 28-Jan-95 Total Eagle Pier CDM at the USCG Buoy yd? 26225 Total Eagle Pier CDM at the USCG Buoy m? 200519 Total Volume of Material Deposited at the USCG Buoy yd? 3189: Total Volume of Maternal Deposited at the USCG Buoy m? 243871 A5 1995-96 Disposal Season Zeerst 30 Kong S6-VON el) 1e peysodeg euINjOA [e101] osz0z sph hong S6-VGN ey} 1e pelisodeg ewunjoA |ej0) 600-16 IM SB 00z St Ste @L 89E Ot it ol 00zt E01 oe 96/1 1760) 60-01-16 SPM SL sat OSL SB b @ 99€ 91 lp o1 oost ozet ett 96/20/60) 600-16 STM SL ost $2 ChB b @ BEE 91 lp oF ocz oo! oor 96/90/60) 6E001-16 STM GL ost 002 BEB b 2 zse 91 tp o1 ocet ozs olor 96/90/60) 6EOOI-IG 4PM SL ost 062 EE b zl GEE OF Ip o1 ez! Ssot 006 = 96/SO/EO 6E0 01-16 STM 8 SLi SL SEB Db zl 99€ 81 Ip 4 ett 0001 og 96/ho/e0 GEO 01-16 STM SL ost SL LEB b @ ge 91 tp OL oe ooez 00l2 —-96/rOreO} 6eo Olle 4tM B ost G2l -6E6 b rd 2st OF ty ot oe6 oog 029 = 96/10/60 60-01-16 SfM 8 002 00l 66 2 zs€ 91 ip or oo1z Spelt SpLt 96/62/20 6E0-01-16 JIM OB 002 G@l heb cd BEE OL bp o1 008 cg oer 96/82/20 6E00l-16 4fM 8 o0z 00L 66 b 2 zs 91 ip oO Spoe S\6L edt 96/87/20 6E0-01-16 4PM OB 00z 00L = bbb @L BEE OF ly or Spal oat 00s} 96/22/20 6001-16 4TM 8 o0z SL OebB zL BEE Ot tp OL oc6t ooet 0091 96/92/20 6EO-0I-16 STM 8 ost 8 Leép @ y6E OL tp or oes osel Sieh 96/b2/20) 6E0 01-16 SPM 8 002 02 St6b a 996 91 iy ol Sbsi ert oezt 96/27/20 6E0-0l-16 SIM OG ose 02 = eh6'b @ eee OL Wy ol 00st oeel Spit g6/ez/20 6E0-01-16 rTM G8 oe S266 b 2 2se 91 ty oF eet oles ocot 96/12/20 60-01-16 SIM 6 oe 02 26 b 2 y6E Ot iy or oz! col oe 96/02/20 6E0-01-16 4M 6 o0e SG le6b @ 8 91 Wy ot Celt 0001 so8 96/61/20) 6E0-0l-16 tM SB ooe St eB b zl ee 91 tp oF oes 00/1 oost 96/51/20 6E00l-16 4mm SB ooe SZ SEB b 2 99€ 91 \y ol ocat OOLt oost 96/b 1/20 6EOOI-16 4PM OL ose $2 SE6b 2 99€ Ot tp o1 Stet Spot sre 96/61/20 6EO 0116 4PM ose 00h = L@6 zl SSE OL iy o1 of6t S\9 0091 96/60/20 6E001-16 4PM S6 le Ol lz b aL PoE OL ip ot 0091 oer oezt 96/80/20 6GE0-01-16 STM SB ose Gb lB by 2 OE OL iy or 00st Seel Oelh 96/40/20 6EOOl-16 4PM «SB ose Ob Keb F 2 86 91 ty or eet [oy os! 96/90/20 6EO0I-16 4th SB osz 0S St6b 2L 996 91 Ip ot seal SOI SISt 96/20/20 6E001-16 4tM 6 00€ 02 166 F 22 BE 91 ‘p ol oz6t Osdt 0091 96/10/20 6E001-16 SIM 6 ose 0S eB b 2L BEE OL p ol Spel o1el 0091 96/LE/L0 6001-16 4fM SB ooe Sk LEB b @ ee 91 ly ot or6l 008 Sot 96/08/10 6E00I-16 4IM 6 oe 001 = Ebb b zs see 91 ty ot 0061 Sect pst 96/62/10 6EOOII6 SIM OG ose S$ 1€6'b @ Be 91 tp OL OeLt o1gt Sip 96/92/10 6EOOl'16 4-M 6 Oo SG St6b 2 996 91 tp oF og! Spol oer 9672/10 6eo ole 4mm 8 ose Ob LEB 22 BE 91 ip o4 oz9t ozst ozet 96/22/10 6001-16 STM SB oe 02 «LEB F 22 ge 91 Ip o1 oes 0001 ee 96/61/10 6600116 4M SB ooe Ol SEB 2 996 O1 tp ot ty) szot oer 96/91/10) 6CO 01-16 STM 8 osz Ol SEB b zl 996 91 ty OL Orci o1gt ofr 96/51/10) 6coolle 4PM Se ove Ol 2B b 22 69 OF ‘y ot 8E91 o1st SieL 86/h 1/10) 6EO O16 STM 8 osz Ol EB F zz 2S€ 91 tp ol Spt stot Sith 96/21/10) 6EO0l-16 4TM oo Ol 616 @L Be Ot by ol zo8t Spol ert 96/41/10 60010b6 TOL Se ose 86S 0S 6166 2 eee oF ip OL Orel Sih oor 96/01/10) 6E0-01-16 4fM SB ose S Str el 996 91 tp o1 ocez 0012 0061 96/60/10) 6EO-0l-16 SIM 8 00 S St6y 2 99€ 91 Ip ot o1zz oc02 ore 96/90/10 6EOOl16 4M S8 ose S 92bb 2 902 61 tp ot Ovez ore oc0z 96/0/10) 6EOO116 AIM 6 oor St LEB 2 86 91 2 ot Spel ocel £91 S6/0E/21 6CO 01-16 4TM 6 oor Ol St6b 2 996 91 tp ol pat S2ut est s6mezeh 6EO-O1-16 JIM 06 ose S 6E6b ze zs€ 91 \y Z oozt SOL ooo! s6reeel 6EO 01-16 ~4TM «OG ose Ol 66 el @s€ Ot tp Z te) Size oo1z s6/ezel 6E001-16 4PM 06 ose ebb b zz BEE 91 Wy Z oze Sez 0z9 Serel/el 6001-16 4PM 08 ove Ol SB y @ 996 91 iy L ssoz 8e6h siah s6at/et 60010%6 TOL SZ ose 3N OS 164 @ ge 91 tp Z ore SSL 42) seaiet 600-1066 101 08 sl@ 9 3N 0S 616 2L eee ot Ip Z Orel Spal Opt S6/LI/2h 6001066 OL S@ oo = =3N OS 616b @ £8 Ob iy Z SSL sso oss S6/LI/24 60010F6 OL 08 sl@3N OS 616% al ee 91 lp Z S061 o1er SOLL Seale 6001066 TOL SB ooe 3N 0S 616 zz eee ob Ip Z 0e9 OS oz s6l/el 60010h6 TOL O08 sles 0S St6r @ 996 OL 7 Z Opdt pot Spst S6/si/eh vtOOlIG SIM OL sh St 6E6 2L se Ot tp Z Segl Ossi oos S6/P heh 6001066 TOL Se oo 86S 0S E26 b el 69€ 91 ty Z sre Spe Spl S6/Pi/eh 6E0-01-16 4f-M G8 ove 3N OL «EB b @ See 91 tp Z oz oz oz S6el/eh GEO 0116 "M06 Sze 3N GL St6b @ 99 OL tp Z ort oszt oozt Serie 60010h6 101 Se ooe 86S Of Sb 2 99€ 91 ip ol soez 0212 o10z S6aO/el 6001076 1OL 6 sze MS 0S €26F ee 69€ 91 ty 8 Spit OcoL oe semoet 6001066 OL 6 see 6S 0S Sth @ 99 91 tp 8 Spot Sb6 ore S6/LO/eL 600106 101 S6 ose 6S OS €26p 2 69£ 91 Ip 8 Shee, Sbi2 ovoz S6/Lo/et 60010b6 OL SB ooe 86S 0S 6f6 el 2S€ 91 ty 8 see see 0eZ s6g0/zt 6001066 Ol 6 see 6S SL léBb ra SSE 9b Ip 8 ssiz 0012 os6l s6s0/el 6001066 1O0l S6 ose 6S OS 6E6b @ 2S€ ot ty 8 0012 sloz siét S6/so/et 6001066 TOL 28 sles 0b LB b el SSE aL tp 8 Si6 see oed S6/sO/el 6001066 OL SB ooe MS 0S GEG F el 2S€ 91 Ip 8 oe0z of6! ocel S6/Po/et 600106 1OL 28 ooe 86S St L@6b @ SSE 91 ty ot ole ozo4 oe s6eorel 6EO-O1-16 IM «SB ose Ol eh b 22 eee 91 ty OL oo1 8e6t OeLt S6/OE/VE 6EO0I-16 4PM SB 00 02 «6b el BEE OF ty oL SO tpb oozt S6/LZ/11 6E0-01-16 4fM $8 ove GS ereb aL gee'ot 2 OL oe! oozt stor S6/Se/tt WONLYSD dSNI L4VHC TOAAD HIG AONGYS NINDNOT D3GDNO7 NINLVT DSG1V1 ISIG SWILLaY 3WIldSIO SWildaG Slvodsia 419 SILSAW Y3AIY OILSAW 10 OLLSAW 'H3AIY OILSAW 19 OILSAW 'Y3AIY OILSAW 19 SILSAW 'H3AIY OILSAW 19 OILSAW ‘HAIN OLLSAW 10 OLLSAW 'H3AIY OLLSAW 10 OILSAW 'H3AIY OLLSAW 19 OILSAW 'H3AIY OILSAW 49 OILSAW 'H3AIY OLLSAW 10 OILSAW 'H3AIY OILSAW 410 OLLSAW 'H3AIH OLLSAW 10 OILSAW 'H3AIY OILSAW 10 OILSAW 'Y3AIY OLLSAW 10 OILSAW 'Y3AIY OILSAW 19 OILSAW 'W3AIY OLLSAW 19 OILSAW 'Y3AIY OILSAW 19 OILSAW 'Y3AIY OILSAW LO OILSAW 'W3AIY OILSAW 19 OILSAW ‘H3AIH OILSAW 19 OILSAW ‘H3AIH OILSAW, 19 OILSAW 'Y3AIY OLLSAW 19 OILSAW 'H3AIY OLLSAW 19 OILSAW ‘H3AIY OLLSAW 410 OILSAW 'Y3AIY OILSAW 19 OILSAW 'H3AIY OILSAW 19 OILSAW ‘H3AIY OILSAW 19 OILSAW 'Y3AIY OILSAW. LO OILSAW "WSAIY OILSAW 19 OLSAW 'WSAIY OILSAW 10 OILSAW 'H3AIY OLLSAW 10 OILSAW 'H3AIY OILSAW 19 OILSAW 'Y3AIY OILSAW 410 O1LSAW 'H3AIY OLLSAW 10 OILSAW 'H3AIY OILSAW 19 OILSAW 'H3AIY OILSAW. 19 OILSAW 'W3AIY OILSAW 10 OLLSAW 'H3AIY OILSAW 10 OILSAW ‘HAI OILSAW 10 OLLSAW ‘H3AIY SILSAW 19 OLLSAW 'H3AIH SILSAW 19 OILSAW 'H3AIY OILSAW 19 OILSAW 'W3AIY OLLSAW 419 OLLSAW 'H3AIY OILSAW 19 ONLSAW "YSAIY OLLSAW 19 OILSAW 'H3AIY OILSAW 10 OILSAW 'H3AIY OILSAW YOBYVH NVILSN3A HOBHVH NVILSN3A YOBYVH NVILIN3A HOBYVH NVILSN3A YORBHVH NVILSN3A YOBYVH NVILSN3A HOSHYVH NVILSN3A YOBHYVH NVILSN3A YOBYVH NVILSNSA YOBYVH NVILSN3A HOSHVH NVIL3N3A YOSYVH NVILSN3A YOSHVH NVILSN3A YORSYVH NVILSN3A HORSYVH NVILSN3A HOSHVH NVILSN3A HOSHVH NVILSN3A YOBYYH NVILSN3A HOSYVH NVILSN3A HOBHYVH NVILSN3A YOBYYH NVILSN3A YOSYVH NVILSN3A YOBYVH NVILSN3A 10 OILSAW 'H3AIY OILSAW 1O OILSAW 'H3AIY OILSAW. 419 OILSAW 'H3AIY SILSAW, 10 OILSAW 'Y3AIY OILSAW 193fOud OILSAW LV GYVA LHOVA S.\Y3M348 OLLSAW LV GYVA LHOVA S.Y3M3H8 OILSAW Lv GYVA LHOVA S.\WaM3Ya OILSAW LV GHYVA JHOVA S.\W3M3YH8 OILSAW LV GHVA LHOWA S.H3M3498 SILSAW LW GQYVA LHOVA S.YSM3Y8 OILSAW LV GQYVA LHOVA S.Y3M3H8 OILSAW Lv GHYVA LHOVA S.YSM3H8 SILSAW LV GHYVA LHOVA S.W3M348 OILSAW LV GUVA LHOVA S.\H3M3H8 OILSAW LV GYVA IHOVA S.Y3M348_ SILSAW LY GYVA IHOWA S.Y3M3Ya OILSAW LV GYVA LHOVA S.YAMauB OILSAW LV GYVA LHOWA S.Y3M3Y48 OILSAW LV GYVA LHOWA S.\YSM3au8 OILSAW LV GYVA LHOVA S.Y3M3u8 OIISAW LV GYVA LHOVA S.Y3M3Y48 OILSAW LY GQYVA LHOWA S.\Y3M3H8 SILSAW L¥ GYVA JHOVA S.Y3M3YH8 OILSAW LV GYVA LHOWA S.Y3M3ua8 OLLSAW LV GYVA LHOVA S.Y3M348 OILSAW LW GYVA IHOWA S.Y3M3H8 OILSAW 1V GYVA LHOVA S.W3M348 OILSAW LV GQYVA LHOVA S.W3M3u8 OILSAW Lv GQYVA LHOVA S.Y3M348 OILSAW LV QHVA LHOVA S.Y3M3H8 OILSAW LY GYVA LHOVA S.\H3M3H8 OILSAW LV GUVA LHOVA S.Y3M3u8 OILSAW LY GYVA LHOVA S.YSM3Yua SILSAW LV GYVA LHOVA S.\Y3M3YHE OILSAW LV GYVA LHOWA S.\H3M3YH8 SILSAW LV GHVA LHOVA S.Y3M3Y8 SILSAW LV GQYVA LHOWA S.\W3M3H8 OILSAW LY GYVA LHOVA S.Y3M3H8 SILSAW LV GYVA LHOWA S.H3M3H8. OILSAW LV GYVA LHOVA S.W3M3H8 SILSAW Lv GYVA LHOWA S.W3M3H8 OILSAW L¥ QHVA LHOVA S.W3M3H8 SILSAW LV GHVA LHOWA S.W3M3H8 OILSAW LY GHVA LHOVA S.Y3M348 OILSAW LY GHVA LHOVA S.\W3M3Y8 OILSAW LV GYVA LHOVA S.\W3M3YE SILSAW LY GHVA LHOWA S.YSM3H8 OILSAW LV GYVA LHOVA S.\Y3M3H8 OILSAW LV GUYVA LHOVA S.YSM3Y8 SILSAW L¥ GYVA LHOVA S.Y3M3H8 90SS¥ INIOd 9NNO1NOLOYD SOSS¥ INIOd SNO1NOLOHD 90SS¥ INIOd ONNO1NOLOYHD O0SSV INIOd ONO7TNOLOYD SOSSV INIOd DNO1NOLOYD SOSSV¥ INIOd SNOT NOLOHD SOSSV INIOd SNO1NOLOYD SOSS¥ LNIOd SNO1NOLOYD S0ssv INIOd 9NO1NOLOHD S0SSv INIOd DNO1NOLOWD SOSsv LNIOd DNO1NOLOYD SOSSV INIOd DNO1NOLOYHD OOSSV LNIOd SNOT NOLOHD O0SSV INIOd DNO1NOLOHD SOSSV INIOd SDNO1NOLOHD SOSSV INIOd DNO1NOLOHD SO0SSV INIOd ONOI NOLOWD SOSSV INIOd ONO1NOLOHD SO0SS¥ INIOd DNO1NOLOYD 90SSY INIOd SNO1NOLOHD 90SSV INIOd DNO1 NOLOHD SOSSYV INIOd ODNO1NO1OHD SO0SSV INIOd SNO1NOLOND OILSAW Lv QYVA LHOVA S.Y3M3YN8 OILSAW LY GUYA LHOVA S.YAM3Y8 OILSAW LV GYVA LHOWA S.YAM3Ya OILSAW LV CYVA LHOVA S.Y3M3Y8, SS LLUNY3ad 065005661 O6S00S661 O6S00S661 O6S00S661 O6S00SE61 O6S00S661 O6S00S661 06S00S661 O6S00S665 O6SO00S661 O6S00S665 O6S00S661 06500661 O6S00S661 O6S00S661 O6S00S661 O6S00S661 O6S00S661 O6S00S661 O6S00S661 O6S00S66t 06S00S661 O6S00S661 O6S00S661 O6S00S661 O6SO00S661 O6S00S661 O6S00S661 O6S00S66! O6S00S661 065005661 O6S00S661 06S00S661 O6S00S661 O06S00S661 06S00S661 O6S00S661 O6S00S661 O6S00S661 O6S00S661 O6S00S661 O6S00S661 O6S00S661 O6S00S661 O6S00S661 06S00S661 BEL00S661 BELOOSEEL 8E100S661 8E100S661 BE L00SE61 B8E100S661 BEL 00S66) BELO0SE6) BELOOSEEL BELOOSE6L BELOOSEBL BEL 00S661 BEL O0SE6I BELO0SE6I BEL 00S661 8€100S661 BEL O0SEEL BE 1005661 BELOOSEEI B8E100S661 BEL00SE6L BELO0SE6I BEL 00SE6I O6S00S661 O6S00S661 O6S00S661 O6SO0SE61 SOZEL SOlel delet eelel 69ZE1 162e4 O6/E1 c6LEh Ole 8021 60LEL LOLEL 80LE1 sole poet eoZel zOlel bozel OoLel 669E1 869Et L69E1 S69E1 v69EL e69el C69EL \69E1 06961 S6SEI S6SEL L6SE1 g6SeL 66SE OSE Looe cose €09e1 POSE! SOSEL 909E1 LL9EL zoel BO9EI 60961 SySEL PySEl OBlel 6LtEL BLIEL LLbet elie cLbet iZieb OLtEL 691E1 B9LEL OLIel 29IEL pLiel SZIeL geect Lege see2t geez cee2 veeet cee see7t oee2t 682! ecocl 2292 geez S6-VON) S6-VON| S6-VON S6-VON S6-VON S6-VON| S6-VON S6-VON S6-VON' S6-VON S6-VON S6'VON S6-VON S6-VONI S6-VONI S6-VON} S6-VON S6-VON| S6-VON S6-VON S6-VON S6-VON S6-VON' S6-VON' S6-VON S6-VON, S6-VON' S6-VON) S6-VON| S6-VON| S6'VON| S6-VON S6-VON' S6-VON) S6-VON) S6-VON| S6-VON S6-VON S6-VON| S6-VON| S6-VON} S6-VON) S6-VON! S6-VON| S6-VON| S6-VON} S6-VON) S6-VON) S6-VONI S6-VON S6-VON| S6-VON S6-VON} S6-VON S6-VON| S6-VON} S6-VON| S6-VON S6'VON S86 VON S6-VON S6-VON) S6-VON| S6-VON| S6-VON! S6-VON S6-VON S6:VON S6-VON| S6-VON| S6-VON S6-VON S6-VON WAN LIWY3d GI dWvS AON) SbOOl-l6 =vwr ea oséh Ss Of vee b eZ tp 98 tb SpOOl-l6 =vwr e2t 0o6t MSM 0S eve p aL 99 91 tp SPOO}-16 VWF Ott osel N 4) S08 el v6r OL bp SPOOlI6 =r ell osol MS OL cee b el 8b oL ib SroOl-l6 =r Oz 0s¢t = MSS S Blab el Zivot ib SpOOl-16 =vwr 901 OsoL M Se ese ed S6r OL ip SbOOl-16 vWF Eat 0061 N 02 eer 2 vr OF bb SPOOlI6 «=vWE 2b oset MS 08 cee P eZ ep 9b tb $90°01-16 SHH E21 oset N 02 82bF eZ €05 9 te $90°01-16 SHH E2t osdt s Ob Leo b aL 205 9b tb SPOOlIG WWF 92t oo8t 3NN 8 S08 b el 66p 91 th GrOOl-I6 =vwr 92 osé6! INN 43 208 b el 16h OL bb SPOOl16 WWF Ott 008! 3Ss Ob 208 b el lpg Ip SbOOl 16 WWT O2t OOdt Ss Sh 108 b el €9p OF ie $90°05-16 SHH Osdt eee b 2 €0S 91 by (90-01-16 SHH e2t osel 3 Ob (ob el tos ot Ve $90°01-16 SHY OOLt Scop el tos 91 ib {90-01-16 SHY E2t osel M Ot S28'b 2 tos ol tb 490°01-16 SHY E21 osst N Ob leap el tos ol ip $90°01-16 SHH E21 oset 0 S28 bp 2 SOL tb 490°01-16 SHH 921 O06! 0 leap el sor tb 91010%6 950 OF oo8 N oo cee eL v6 9 bp 9001-16 SHH Ee2t osel N 0S lee b el vos 91 tp 190-0116 SHH E€2t osst N Ov leer e vos ol bp }9001-16 SHH Eat osel M .02 Leap (aa 205 91 bb 90-01-16 SHH 91t oo8t N 02 8c8 b (qa tos gt 7 1900-01-16 SHH E€2t oo8t 0 Leap eL sol tp $90°01-16 SHH Ott OOLt Ss Of 928 b eZ 86h 91 be (90-01-16 SHH €21 oset s SL Sze b eZ 96h 91 bp 190-0116 SHH €2t 0061 N Ov Lee b ed €0s 91 bb 1900-01-16 SHH E01 oos! N 08 W2op 2 So ib 490°05-16 SHH O21 008! Ss 02 lay 2 96 91 bb 4190-01-16 SHY O21 Ost Ss Se ear e S6r Ot bb 90-01-16 SHH 91t osel 3 OL coy él SoL Ip {90-01-16 SHH Oz OOZt s sO 928 b el €6p 91 ib 9101046 990 ob 008 N ool cee b el vor OL tp (90-01-16 SHH Ett 009! M 02 leap 2 €0S5 91 ip (90-01-16 SHH OZ osel a .02 cap el bos or tb 4190-01-46 SHH OOL OOoPrt N 08 bse pb el 4OS 9 by 190-01-16 SHH O21 oost E} Ob heap él 6p 91 te 9HOlOKE DOQ uF 008 N oo8 2e8 b el v6y OL te $90-01-16 SHY O22 oset O €28b el €0S5 91 tb $90-01-16 SHH Ett ose Ss S veo b e 20s OF ip 1900116 SHH Ott 0021 Ss S be8b el los ot pb 190-01-16 SHH OOL OO Ss S Seep el 40S 84 Vp 49001716 SHH Ott osel N SZ te8 p a €6r 91 ty $90°01-16 SHH OO} osot Ss SE \28p (qa P91 tp 9101066 990 OF 006 N oot beep el ep 9b ip $90-01-16 SHH €2) 009! N 0S Leap el 80S 91 tb (9001-16 SHY O21 osdt 0 beep eZ gor tp '90-01-16 SHY ELL Osc 0 SB ry (qa Or 91 Ib 9O10r DDG OL oo8 N ool ceB b e v6r 91 Ve $90°01-16 SHH €2t oodt 0 Bley el SOS 91 Wy 4190-01-16 SHH bal oo8t 0 cep @ pos 9b tp §90-01-16 SHH E21 008! 0 Lea y el eos 91 ey {90-01-16 SHH O21 OoLt 0 deeb eZ €05 91 ip (90-01-16 SHH O2t Oost a 02 eee b (7 20S Ot bb 19001-16 SHY E2t ooZt =] 02 See b eZ 20S OL by 1900116 SHY O21 OsZt 0 bee b el sos ot ib (90-01-16 SHH ELL OsZt 0 Sc8 b el tos 91 ip 9001-16 Stitt Oat OOLt 0 928 b el 4os 94 Ib (90-01-16 SHity 6 OOrt M Ot Lap el tos 91 ie §90°01-16 SHH Ett asst 0 bee b (7 So Ip 9001-16 SHH eb osel M SG cep a Sol tb {9001-16 SHH 9E€t os6l N ol Leap (qa sol bb $90°01-16 SHU 62t s/o 3 06 cob ed SOb OF ip 190-O1-16 Shit} 9EL Os6h N of L278 b ed Ser 9 tb (90-01-16 SHH et Osé6t 3 GL Scab eZ rol bp $90°01-16 SHH E€2b 0061 M 08 28 F el €0S 91 tp (9001-16 SHY 921 0061 M 001 cor aL 20S 91 bp 4190-01-16 SHH E21 Os6i M 0S bee b el 40S Ot Ip 490°01-16 SHH et Osét M GL beep 2 SBP 9 te 6E001-16 4M 6 ose 4 cB b 2 6p 91 Ib 6E0 01-16 4PM 6 ose Sk cap el 26P 91 tb 6E001-16 4PM 6 ose SG cep 2 d6p 91 bb GEO 01-16 STM 6 oot 02 wee el 6p 91 itd WNN1LY39 OL O€0z sset Siob SP9oL S6/PO/LL S6/PO/LE S6EO/LE SEEO/KE S6/EO/LE S6/ZO/L1 S6/ZO/KE S6/2O/Kb S6/LO/LE SE/FO/LE SE/LO/LE SE/LO/LE S6/LO/LE S6/LO/LE S6/LE/OL SE/LE/O1 S6/LE/O S6/LE/OL S6/LE/OL S6/LE/OL S6/LE/OL S6/OE/01 S6/OE/01 S6/OE/01 S6/0E/01 S6/OE/01 S6/OE/01 S6/0€/01 S6/OE/01 S6/62/01 S6/6Z/01 S6/62/01 S6/62/01 S6/ee/01 s6/ee/0l S6/L2/01 S6/LZ/01 S6/L2/01 S6/Z2/01 S6/2/01 s6/9z/01 S69Z0l se7ol s6zol S6/2/01 S6/BZ/01 S6/92z/01 S6/S2/OL S6/S2/0L S6/S2/01 S6/S2/01 S6/r2/01 S6/PC/01 S6/Pe/01 S6/pe/01 S6/P2/01 S6/E2/01 S6/ec/0l S6/E2/01 S620) s6fezol S6EZ/01 S601 S6/e2/01 s6/ez/01 S6/e2/0l 6/22/01 S6/22/01 S6/I 2/04 S6/I 2/01 S6/12/01 S6/1 2/01 S6/90/1 4 S6/ZO/Lb S6/LO/KA S6/LE/OL 49 'NOGNO1M3N # NOLOHO 'H3AIH SANWHL 19 ‘NOONO1M3N 9 NOLOHD 'H3AIH SSWWHL 419 'NOGNO7M3N 9 NOLOHD 'H3AIH SSNWHL 419 ‘NOGNO1M3N 3 NOLOHD 'W3AIY SSAVHL 419 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOWD 'H3AIY S3SNVHL 410 ‘NOGNO1 M3N 9 NOLOHD 'H3AIN S3NVHL 49 'NOONO1M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIH SSWVHL 49 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOWD 'Y3AIH S3NWHL 49 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOWD 'H3AIH SANWHL 419 'NOGNO7 M3N ? NOLOYD 'Y3AIY SSNVHL 419 'NOGNO1M3N 3 NOLOHD ‘Y3AIY SSNVHL 419 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOWD 'Y3AIY SSNVHL 410 'NOGNO1 M3N ? NOLOHD 'Y3AIY SSWVHL 419 'NOGNO1M3N ® NOLOUD ‘H3AIY SANVHL 49 'NOGNO1M3N ® NOLOHD 'Y3AIY S3NWHL 419 ‘NOGNO1M3N 3 NOLOUD 'Y3AIY S3NVWHL 49 'NOONO7M3N 3 NOLOUD 'H3AIY S3NVHL 419 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIH S3WVHL 19 'NOGNO1MAN 2 NOLOHD ‘W3AIY S3SNVHL 19 'NOONO7 M3N 8 NOLOWD ‘Y3AIY SSNVHL 419 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOWD 'H3AIY SSNWHL 19 'NOLOHD 'W3AIN SAWVHL 49 ‘NOGNO7 M3N ? NOLOHD ‘Y3AIY SSAVHL 19 'NOONO1 M3N 2 NOLOHD 'Y3AIY SSNVHL 19 'NOGNO1 MAN 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIY S3NVHL 19 'NOONO1 M3N 8 NOLOWD 'H3AIY SANWHL 4190 'NOGNO7 M3N 3 NOLOYD 'H3AIN SSNWHL 19 ‘NOGNO1M3N #8 NOLOWD 'Y3AIN SANVHL 19 'NOONO1M3N 8 NOLOWD 'H3AIH SANWHL 19 ‘NOONO1M3N ® NOLOWD 'Y3AIH SSWWHL 19 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOWD ‘Y3AIY SSNVHL 49 ‘NOGNO7 M3N ? NOLOHD 'H3AIY SANWHL 10 'NOONO1 M3N 8 NOLOWD ‘H3AIY S3WVHL 19 'NOONO1M3N 8 NOLOWD 'H3AIH S3NVHL 419 ‘NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOUD 'Y3AIY SSWVHL 10 'NOLOHDS 'Y3AIN SSNVHL 419 'NOGNO1 M3N ? NOLOYD 'Y3AIY SSWVHL 419 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOWD 'H3AIY S3NVHL 19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOWD 'H3AIY S3NVHL 19 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOWD 'H3AIH S3NWHL 419 ‘NOLOHO 'H3AIN SSNVHL 419 'NOGNO1M3N 2 NOLOWD 'Y3AIY SANVHL 419 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'Y3AIY S3NVHL 419 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOHO 'H3AIY S3NVHL 419 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIY S3NVHL 419 ‘NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOHD 'Y3AIY SSNVHL 419 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOUD 'Y3AIY SSNVHL 19 'NOLOHD 'H3AId SSNVHL 19 'NOONO1 M3N 2 NOLOWD 'Y3AIH SSNWHL 19 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'Y3AIY SSWVHL 19 'NOGNO7 M3N 3 NOLOYD 'W3AIH SSNVHL 410 'NOLOUD 'Y3AIN SAWVHL 19 ‘NOONO1 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIY SANVHL 19 'NOONO1 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'Y3AIY SANVHL 49 'NOGNO7 MAN 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIW SAWWHL 419 'NOGNO1 M3N 3 NOLOYD 'Y3AIY SSNVHL 419 'NOGNO1M3N # NOLOWD 'Y3AIY SANVHL 410 'NOONO1 M3N 8 NOLOWD 'Y3AIH SSNVHL 19 'NOONO7 M3N 8 NOLOWD 'Y3AIH SSNVHL 19 'NOONO1 M3N 2 NOLOHD 'Y3AIH SSWWHL 19 ‘NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIY SSNWHL 19 'NOONO1M3N 2 NOLOHD ‘USAIN SSWVHL 19 'NOONO1M3N 2 NOLOWD 'H3AIH S3NVHL 19 'NOONO1M3N 8 NOLOHO 'Y3AIN SSWVHL 49 'NOGNO1M3N # NOLOHD 'Y3AIY SANVHL 10 'NOOGNO1M3N 9 NOLOUD 'Y3AIU SSNWHL 19 'NOGNO17M3N 2 NOLOWD 'Y3AIY SSWVHL 410 ‘'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOHD 'Y3AIY SSNWHL 19 'NOGNO1 M3N 2 NOLOWD 'Y3AIH SSWWHL 49 'NOGNO7 M3N 3 NOLOHD 'Y3AIY SSWNVH1 19 'NOGNO1 M3N ® NOLOHD 'Y3AIH SSWWHL 19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOUD 'H3AIY SSWVHL AIOMVWAS - AAVN/Ld30 STOMV3S - AAWN/1d30 J TOMVSS - AAVN/1d30 SIOMVSS - AAVN/1d30, ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVSS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVIS - AAVN/Ld30 ASTOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVW3S - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS * AAVN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 A TOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30 AIOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAWN/1d30 STOMVSS - AAWN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAWN/1d30 J TOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 STOMWAS - AAVN/Ld30 Lt Yald - AAWN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 SIOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVWAS - AAVN/Ld30 STOMVAS - AAVN/Ld30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30 STOMWAS - AAVN/1d30 JTOMW3S - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVWSS - AAWN/1d30 STOMVSS - AAVN/1d30 STOMWAS - AAVN/1d30 SIOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30, 2) Y3ld - AAVN/1d30 STOMVW AS - AAVN/1d30 STOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 SIOMVAS - AAWN/1d30 SIOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30 2) Y3ld - AAVN/Ld3G SIOMVWAS - AAVN/Ld30 SIOMVAS - AAVN/1d3G0 A TOMWSS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAWN/1d30 AIOMVAS - AAWN/1d30 Zt Wald - AAVN/1d3G ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVSS - AAVN/1d30 SOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 2) Y3ld - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30 A TOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVSS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVWAS - AAWN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAWNW/1d30 SIOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 SIOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 A IOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30 JIOMVW3S - AAVN/1d30 JTOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 A TOMVIS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVSS - AAVNW/1d30 STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 SIOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30 ASNI 14VHYG TOAAD HI AONGYS NINDNOT D3GDNO7 NIWLV1 DAGiv1 1SIG 3WILLay aWildsia 3Wiid3d 31vddsid 103fOud Y3AIY OLLSAW WNASNW 1uOdV3S OLLSAW Y3AIY DILSAW WOSSNW LuOdv3S OILSAW Y3AIY OILSAW WN3SNW LuOdW3S OLLSAW YBAIY DILSANW_WN3SNW LYOdW3S OILSAW B000Z661 bOOEL ee000z661 POOEL €e000z661 Oocet 80002661 666e1 EB000Z661 86621 €B000z661 26621 80002661 96621 80002661 6671 80002661 06621 EB000Z661 68621 €80002661 €6621 €e000cs6 1 y662l 80002661 6624 €80002661 16621 80002661 98621 €80002661 88621 £80002661 L862 €80002661 S862) €80002661 veecl €80002661 £8621 £8000Z661 ee6el 6S610r661 00621 80002661 61621 €80002661 82621 €e000c661 S621 €e000c661 08621 ee000z661 94621 80002661 \e621 €e000z661 L262 8000661 12624 €B000Z661 22624 ©B000z661 e262 80002661 pl62h 80002661 69621 ©80002661 0/621 6S6L0r661 66821 80002661 S96e1 EB000Z661 89621 80002661 9621 €e000c661 996el 6S610r661 86821 8000661 196c1 8000661 6s6c1 €80002661 e962 80002661 0962) 80002661 9621 80002661 y962t 6S610r661 26825 80002661 9S621 €e8000c661 Ls624 80002661 eséel 6S610F661 96821 80002661 pséel 80002661 Ssé2h 80002661 es6ch 80002661 2S621 ©8000Z661 6r6el €80002661 Lpé2t 80007661 (S621 €80002661 erect e000z661 Os62 €80002661 9ré2t 80002661 Sr621 €80002661 pr6ZL e8000z661 br6et eB000z661 Er62t 80002661 Oré2i €80002661 C474) €8000z661 Be6z1 80002661 6E6c1 B000Z661 Le621 €8000Z661 9E621 L8L00SE61 s7zeel 28L00S66t peek 282005661 eee2 482005661 c2eek S3LLUNY3ad WON LINYSd Gl dAWS O10 rE €90°01-16 €90-01-16 90-01-16 €90°01-16 €90-01-16 €90°01-16 9010-6 BOLO 6 €90°01-16 €90°01-16 €90-01-16 €90°01-16 €90-01-16 €90°01-t6 €90-01-16 €90-01-16 €90-01-16 €90°01-16 €90°01-16 €90-01-16 910-10 66 €90-01- €90°01- €90-01- SPO Ol- €90-01- €90°01 SbO-Ol- 910 10-6 ShO-O1-16 SO 01-16 SPO-O1-16 SPO-O1-46 SrO-O1-16 910-10 r6 Oo rE SPO-O1-16 GPO-O1-16 SPO-O1-16 GPO-O1-16 SpO-O1-16 SbOO1-16 O10 re 910106 9LO1O re SbO-O1-16 SbO-O1-16 SPO-OL-16 SPO-O1-16 910106 91010 r6 SbOO1-16 ShO-O1-16 SbO-O1-16 SbO-O1-16 9010 F6 ShOOL-16 SbO-O1-16 SpO-O1-16 SPO-O1-16 SrO-O1-16 90106 9101066 SbO-O1-16 SrO-O1-16 SPO-O1-16 SbO-O1-16 SbO-01-16 SPO-O1-16 SPO O1-16 SPO-O1-16 SPO O1-16 Spo Ol-16 SPO O1-16 SPO-OL-16 SbO-01-16 oozzoz¥zzog zzzogzzzz00z0zz LlE91 6r ol blp ol SP OL OPP OL brol 82r 91 dp gt pol IS 9L 6Lb 94 ZF 91 6rr Ol chp ob terol rol 69h OL 9p OL 6hr OL Shp ol ver ob b6r 91 22S 9l 2S 9 1S 9h ger ol 8P ol Sop 91 Sep ot er 9 LIS OL 60S 91 Sol 6r 91 Spot 88P 91 eer ol SOS 91 966 91 b6p Ot 62h 91 69p 91 pop OL l6p 91 v6p 91 r6r 91 sor Sp Ot 6bp Ol lbp ot bisgot 6p 91 6Sp 91 BSP 91 9Sb OL Sp ol 26p 9t 20S 91 909 91 So 9Zb OL \9r 9b d6r 91 bor OL sol cep OL 6Lp 91 Sop OL SOS 91 6h 91 6b Ot elb ol b9p Ot bos ot S6P 91 Lip ot Slp ot G6/Lb/b4 S6/Lb/14 SE/LU/NA S6/LN/L4 SB/Lb/bA S6/LI/LN SE/Lb/bN S6/OL/th S6AI/IL S6I/Ih SEALE S6AI/tE S6AI/IS S6/OI/th S6/I/tE S6/SI/bh S6/PI/Lh SEP /th S6/PI/LE S6/P L/L S6/PI/LE SEEN S6EL/LL S6EN/LE SEEL/bL SBEN/LL S6AL/IL S6fEL/tE S6EN/Ih G6/EA/UA S6/LI/EE S6/EL/LE SE/EN/EE S6/LV/UL S6/EA/LE S6/O1/Lh S6/O1/th S6/Ob/th S6/O1/14 S6/OL/tE G6/OI/LL S6/ON/th S6/O1/bh S6/60/11 S6/60/11 S6/60/11 S6/60/41 S6/6O/14 S6/60/t1 S6/60/11 S6/RO/11 S6/B0/11 S6/B0/14 S6/B0/L1 S6/B0/11 S6/RO/Lh S6/LO/LL S6/LO/LE S6/LO/LA S6/LO/t1 S6/LO/LE S6/LO/b1 S6/0/11 S6/90/11 S6/90/t1 S6AO/IL S6A0/11 S6A0/11 S6/SO/IL S6/SO/h1 S6/SO/b I S6/SO/11 S6/SO/L I S6/bO/LE S6/0/11 S6/vO/b 1 S6/PO/1 1 10 'NOLOHD 'H3AIY SANVHL 419 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'Y3AIY S3NVHL 19 ‘NOGNO1 M3N ? NOLOHD 'W3AIY SSNWHL 19 'NOGNO1M3N 3 NOLOUD ‘H3AIY S3NVHL 19 'NOQNO7 M3N 3 NOLOHD 'Y3AIY S3NVHL 19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIY SSNVHL 19 'NOGNO1M3N 3 NOLOHD ‘H3AIY SSWVHL 19 'NOLOUD 'H3AIY SSWVHL 19 'NOLOYD 'Y3AIY SSNWHL 10 'NOGNO1M3N 3 NOLOYD 'H3AIY SSNVHL 419 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOHD ‘'H3AIH SSNVHL 419 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOYDS 'H3AIN SSNWHL 49 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOHD ‘'H3AIH S3NWHL 419 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOUYD 'H3AIY SSNVHL 49 'NOGNO1M3N 3 NOLOHD ‘H3AIY SSAWHL 419 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD ‘H3AIH SSWWHL 19 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOWD 'H3AIN SSNWHL 49 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIH SSWWHL 419 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOHO 'H3AIY SSNWHL 19 ‘NOGNO1M3N 2 NOLOYD 'H3AIY SANVHL 19 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'Y3AIH SANVHL 19 'NOLOHO 'H3AIN S3WVHL 19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOHD 'Y3AIN SANVHL 19 'NOGNO1M3N-3 NOLOYD 'H3AIY S3NVHL 19 'NOGNO1M3N 3 NOLOHD 'H3AIy S3NVHL 419 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOUD 'H3AIY S3NVHL 19 'NOGNO1M3N 3 NOLOHD 'H3AIN SSNVHL 19 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOYD 'H3AIN S3WVHL 19 'NOGNO1M3N 3 NOLOWD 'H3AIN S3NVHL 19 'NOLOUDS 'H3AIY SSWVHL 19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOHD ‘W3AIY S3NVHL 419 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOUD 'H3AIY SSNVHL 10 ‘NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOUD ‘H3AIY S3WVHL 19 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOHD 'Y3AIN SANVHL 19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIH S3AVHL 19 'NOLOUD 'Y3AIN SSNVHL 19 'NOLOUD ‘H3AIH SSNWHL 19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIN S3WVHL 10 'NOGNO7M3N 3 NOLOHD 'Y3AIY SAWVHL 419 'NOONO7MAN 8 NOLOYD ‘'Y3AIY SSNWHL 19 'NOGNO1M3N 3 NOLOHD 'W3AIY SSNVHL 10 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIN SAWVHL 19 'NOONO7M3N 8 NOLOUD 'H3AIY SSNWHL 19 'NOLOHD 'H3AIN SAWNVHL 19 'NOLOYD 'U3AIY SSWWHL 19 'NOLOHD 'H3AIY SSNVHL 10 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'Y3AIY SSWVHL 419 'NOONO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'W3AIY SANVHL 40 ‘NOONO1M3N 3 NOLOHD 'H3AIN SSNVHL 19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOUD 'W3AIY SAWVHL 419 'NOLOUD 'Y3AIY SSWVHL 49 ‘NOLOHD 'U3AIY SSWVHL 419 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOYD 'H3AIY SSWNVHL 19 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIY SANVHL 19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOWD 'H3AIY SAWWHL 10 'NOGNO17M3N 8 NOLOWD 'H3AIN S3WVHL 419 'NOLOUD 'Y3AId SSWVHL 19 ‘NOONO7M3N 8 NOLOYD 'Y3AIN SSNVHL 19 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOYD 'H3AIY SSWNVHL 419 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOHD ‘H3AIH S3WWHL 19 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOUD 'H3AIN SSNVHL 19 'NOGNO17 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIN S3NVHL 10 'NOLOWD 'Y3AIH SANVHL 10 'NOLOUD 'N3AIY SSNVHL 19 'NOGNO1M3N 9 NOLOYD 'H3AIN SSWVHL 410 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOYD 'Y3AIN SSNVHL 419 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOYD ‘H3AIY SSWVHL 19 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'Y3AIN SSNVHL 40 'NOONO1 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'U3AIN SANVHL 19 'NOONO7M3N 8 NOLOWD 'H3AIH SSWVHL 419 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOWD 'H3AIY SSNVHL 10 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOWD 'Y3AIY S3WVHL 19 'NOGNO1M3N ? NOLOUD 'Y3AIY SANVHL 19 'NOGNO7 MAN ? NOLOHD 'Y3AIN SSNVHL 19 'NOGNO1M3N ? NOLOUD 'Y3AIY SSNVHL 19 'NOGNO7M3N 3 NOLOUD 'H3AIN SSNVHL 19 'NOONO1M3N 3 NOLOYD ‘Y3AIY S3NVHL Lb ald ATOMV3S - STOMVSS - SYOMV3S - SYOMV3S STOMV3S SIOMVAS - 2) ald 2) Wald - ATOMV3S AS TOMVAS JYOMV3S STOMV3S AYOMV3S STOMVW3S - STOMVAS ATOMV3S JTOMV3S ATOMV3S STOMVAS ~ AIOMVAS - LL YAld - ATOMV3S JTOMV3S ATOMV3S - SIOMVIS - STOMV3S AS TOMV3S ATOMV3S Zt YAld - A TOMVAS ATOMV3S - ATOMV3S STOMVAS - STOMVWAS - Zt b3ld Lb Y3ld - ATOMVWAS - ATOMVSS AIOMV3S ATOMVAS - STOMV3S - ATOMVAS - Li Wald - 2) 3ld- dt Y3ld- ATOMVSS - ATOMVAS - A TOMVAS - SIOMVAS Lt Yald Li YAld - STOMVSS * STOMVAS - AYOMV3S ATOMV3S - Zt Y3ld- ATOMVSS SIOMV3S ATOMVSS * SIOMV3S - ATOMVSS Zt Wald - Lt Y3ld - STOMVAS - ATOMVSS - A OMVWAS - STOMV SS - STOMV3S - ATOMVS3S - ATOMV SS - STOMVSS * ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d 350 ATOMVWAS - AAYN/1d30 STOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 AIOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 AAVN/1d30 AAWN/1d30 AAWN/1d30 XAWN/1d30 AAWN/1d3G0 AAVN/1d30 AAVN/1d30 AAVN/1d30 AAVN/1d30 AAWN/1d30 AAVN/1d30, AAWN/1d30 AAVN/1d30 AAWN/1d30 AAVN/1d30 AAVN/1d30, AAVN/1d3aG AAWN/1d30 AAWN/1d3G0 AAWN/1d30 AAWN/1d30 AAVN/1d30, AAVN/1d30, AAWN/1d30 AAVN/1d30 AAWN/1d30 AAWN/1d30 AAWN/1d30 AAWN/1d30 AAWN/1d30 AAVN/1d30 AAWN/1d30 AAWN/1d30 AAWN/1d30 AAWN/1d30 AAWN/1d30, AAVN/1d3G AAWN/1d30 ANWN/1d30, AAVN/1d30 AAWN/1d30 AAVN/1d30 AAVN/1d30 AAVN/1d30, AAVN/1d30 AAWN/1d30 AAWN/1d30 AAVN/1d30 AAVN/1d350 MAVN/1d30 AAWN/1d30 AAVN/1d30 AAWN/1d30 AMWN/1d30 AAWN/Ld30 AAVN/1d30 AAWN/1d50 AAWN/1d3G AAVN/1d30 AAVN/Ld30 AAWN/1d 350 AAWN/1d30 AWN/1d30 AAVN/1d3G AAVN/1d30, AAWN/1d30, AAWN/1d30 AAYN/1d30 AAVN/1d30 AAVN/1d3aG, AAVYN/1d30 AAWN/1d30 6S610r661 80002661 €B000Z661 EB000Z66t 80007661 €B000z661 8000661 6S610r661 6S610r661 80007661 €8000Z661 80002661 €80002661 €8000z661 80007661 80002661 ee000z66+ 80002661 €8000¢661 ee000z66! 80002661 6S610r661 €B0002661 €80002661 80002661 B000ZE61 ©80002661 80002661 €80002661 6S610r661 €80002661 €80002661 €80002661 80002661 80002661 6S610r661 6S610r661 €80002661 80002661 €8000Z661 80002661 ©B000Z661 80002661 6S610r66) 6S610P661 6S6L0r661 B000Z661 €80002661 €80002661 €e000z661 65610661 6S610r661 B000Z661 €80002661 80002661 €80002661 6S610r661 80002661 80002661 80002661 80002661 80002661 6S610r661 6S610P661 80007661 80007661 €8000z661 80002661 80002661 90002661 80002661 80002661 80002665 80002661 80002661 80002661 8000665 €90-01-16 €30° 01-16 €90-01-16 £90-01-16 €90-01-16 910 tO rs 910-106 €90-01-16 910-10 r6 910 10-6 €90°01-16 91010 r6 910 10-6 €90°01-16 €90°01-16 €90°01-16 81010 re 910 10-66 SbO-01-16 €90°01-16 €90-01-16 €90°01-16 91010 F6 9O1O re SbOO1-16 SpO-O1-16 SPO 01-16 S¥O- 01-56 SrO-O1-16 SO 01-16 910106 SPO O1-16 SPO O1-16 SpO-Ol-16 SPO O1-16 SPO OL-N6 SPO-O1-16 SPO 01-16 SrO 01-16 SpO- 01-16 SPO O1-16 910 10-66 S10 10-6 SPO-O1-16 SPO O1-16 SPO-O1-16 SbOO1-16 SPO OL-16 910 10-6 910-1066 SPO-O1-16 SpO-O1-16 €90-01-16 SPO-O1-16 SbO-O1-16 SPO-OL-16 910 10-6 910° 10-66 €90-01-16 90-01-16 €90°01-16 €90-01-16 €90-01-16 0012 6S 91 6lp 91 Llp ot epor vip OL 9Sr ol 9Spol frp ol dpor BSP OL Sep ot BSP OL Sr ol e6y Ol 88r OL Spot dpor 9Sp SL 905 91 avon SboL pyoL dbo Sp Ol 60S 91 66 Ot 6p 91 SBP Ot QP 91 Ble ol Sb Ot bigot 80S 9 66h 91 66h 91 6p 91 bp oh sis got SISoh €0S 91 SSp OL db 9oL 8Sb OL tis ol l6p 91 GLb OL 89b OL esp Ot Shp OL 8Sb OL 66r OL 66p 9b Sep ol cop 9b Sp 91 deo. bop 91 6p 91 tZp 9b 99b 91 99P OL Lop 91 edb ol ivory 6h 91 cer ot L991 SOP OL eSp Ot Sbp Ol dp oO. 9SP OL Sor S6p 91 6r 91 Sip ot bre ot S6feo/el s6/eoreh S6/cOrel s6/eo/el sé/co/el S6/OE/tb SBE 6/62/11 S6/ee/tt sereett sereztt S6/L2/Lb S6ILZ/b S6/LE/LL S6/L/b S6/L/tt S6/ez/ih see S692 th seoztt serait seeett SErSe/bt S6/S2bh S6/SZ/tb S6/SZ/bt S6/se/t tb SE/S2/t S6/Se/tt S6/Se/bh S6/re/h 4 S6me/b S6/Pe/b S6/PO/bb S6reeht S6/Pe/th S6/Pe/t 4 S6EC/tL SEEC/II SEE sefeeth S6/ee/tb S6/e2/i4 S6/eesth S6/ee/bb S6/ee/bb S6/ee/th S6/CC/tL S6/ee/th SE/besbh SE/KE/E S6/LZ/EL SE/be/b S6/LC/LS SE/b2/bb SE/02/ tt S6/0Z/tt S6/02/tt S6/02/ bh S6/02/bt S6/02/tb S6/0Z/ tb S6BI/IE S6/BI/tb SEE I/LL S6/BI/tb S6/6N/b S6/6I/bb G6/6E/bb SE/BL/LE SBI Seats S6/at/Lt S6/Ob/tb S6/BI/bE S6Al/ih SEAL 419 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOWD 'H3AIH SSNVHL 419 ‘NOGNO1 M3N 3 NOLOHD 'Y3AIH SSNVHL 19 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOWD 'H3AIH SSNVHL 419 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIN SSWVHL 49 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIH SSNVHL 419 ‘NOLOHD 'H3AIH SSWVHL 410 'NOLOHD 'H3AIY SSNVHL 19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOUD '3AIY SSWVHL 410 ‘NOLOHD 'H3AIY SSWVHL 419 'NOLOUD 'U3AIY SANVHL 419 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOHD ‘Y3AIN SSNVHL 49 'NOLOHD 'H3AIN SSNVHL 410 'NOLOHD 'H3AId SSNVHL 419 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'Y3AIY SANVHL 10 'NOGNO17M3N 3 NOLOHD ‘H3AIH SSWVHL 19 'NOGNO7 MAN 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIH SANVHL 19 'NOLOWD 'H3AIU S3NVHL 19 'NOLOUD 'W3AIN SANVHL 19 'NOGNO17 M3N 3 NOLOWD ‘H3AIN SSWWHL 19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOYD 'Y3AIY S3SNWHL 19 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOWD ‘Y3AIH SSNVHL 19 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOWD 'H3AIH SSNVHL 19 'NOLOUD ‘W3AIN S3NVHL 19 'NOLOHD 'H3AId SSNVHL 19 'NOGNO1M3N 3 NOLOUD 'H3AIN S3SWVHL 419 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOHO 'H3AIY SANVHL 419 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIY SANVHL 19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOYD 'H3AIY SSNVHL 10 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOUD ‘H3AIY SSWVHL 419 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOUD ‘H3AIY SSNVHL 19 'NOLOHD 'H3AIY SSNWHL 19 'NOGNO1M3N 3 NOLOHO 'H3AIY SSNVHL 19 'NOONO1M3N 8 NOLOHO 'H3AIY SSNVHL 410 'NOONO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIY S3NVHL 19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIN SSNVH1L 19 'NOONO7 MAN 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIN SAWVHL 190 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOUD 'Y3AIH SSNVHL 10 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOHO 'H3AIH SSWWHL 19 'NOGNOT M3N 8 NOLOWD 'Y3AIY SANVHL 10 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOUD 'H3AI4 SSWVHL 19 'NOONO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIY SSNVHL 19 'NOLOYD 'Y3AIY S3SNVHL 19 'NOLOYD 'H3AIY S3WNVHI 19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOHO 'H3AI¥ SSWWHL 19 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOHO 'H3AIN SSNVHL 419 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOUD 'Y3AIY SSWWHL 19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOYO 'H3AIN SSAWHL 419 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIN SSNVHL 19 'NOGNO7 M3N NOLOHD 'H3AIH SSWVHL 19 'NOLOHO 'H3AIY SSWWHL LO 'NOGNO7M3N 3 NOLOYD ‘USAIN S3NVHL 19 ‘NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOHD ‘H3AIN SSNVHL 419 ‘NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOWD 'Y3AIY SSNVHL 19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOUD ‘H3AIY SSWVHL 19 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOUD 'Y3AId SANVHL 419 'NOLOUD 'H3AIY SSWVHL 19 'NOLOUD 'H3AIY SSNVHL 19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOWD 'Y3AIH SSWWHL 19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOUD 'Y3AIY SANVHL 419 'NOGNO7 M3N # NOLOHD 'H3AIH SAWVHL 19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOHD 'Y3AIY SSWVHL 19 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOUD 'Y3AIH SSNVHL 410 'NOLOHD 'H3AIY SSNVH1 19 'NOLOUD 'W3AIY SSNVHL 10 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOYD 'H3AIN SSNVWHL 19 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'W3AIN SANVHL 10 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOYD 'H3AIH SSNVHL 10 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOUD 'Y3AIY SSWVHL 19 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOHD ‘Y3AIN S3SNVHL 19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOUD 'H3AIY SSNVHL 40 'NOLOUD 'H3AIH SSNVHL 410 'NOLOHD 'H3AIY SSNVHL 19 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOUD 'H3AIY SSWVHL 19 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOWD 'Y3AIY SSWVHL 19 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AI¥ SSNWHL 419 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOYD 'Y3AIH SSNVHL 19 'NOONO7M3N 8 NOLOYD 'H3AIN S3WWHL STOMVSS - AAVN/1d30 SIOMVSS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAWN/1d3G STIOMVSS - AAVNW/1d30 STOMVWSS - AAWN/1d30 2) Y3ld - AAWN/1d30 21 W3ld - AAWN/1d30 SIOMVSS - AAVN/1d30 2) Wald - AAVN/1d30, 21 W3ld - AAVN/1d30 SIOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30 Zt Y3ld - AAVN/1d30 Zt Y3Id - AAWN/1da0 ATOMVWAS - AAWN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 STOMWAS - AAVN/1d30 Zt Wald - AAWN/1d30 21 W3ld - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 SIOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAVN/1d3G Zt 3d - AAVN/1d30 Zt W3ld - AAVN/1d3G STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 SIOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVAS = AAVN/1d35G ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAWN/1d350 STOMVWAS - AAWN/1d30 Zt H3ld - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30 A TOMVSS - AAVN/1d350 ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVSS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVW3S - AAVN/1d30 STOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVSS > AAVN/1d30 STOMVSS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVSS > AAVN/1d350 STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 2b Ald - AAVN/1d30 2) Y3Id - AAVN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAWN/1d30 STOMWAS - AAWN/1d350 SIOMVAS - AAWN/1d30 ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVSS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d3G dt W3ld - AAVN/1d30 ATIOMVSS - AAWN/1d30 A TOMV AS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 Zt ald - AAVNW/1d30 Zt Wald - AAWW/1d30 STOMVIS - AAVN/1d30 STOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 STOMVSS - AAVN/1d350 ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30 SOMVAS - AAWN/1d350 Lt Ald - AAVNW/1d30 2) Y3ld - AAVN/1d30 ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS > AAVN/1d30 STOMVSS * AAVN/1d350 A TOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d350 2) Y3ld - AAVN/1d30 2) W3ld - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMW3S - AAWN/1d30 JIOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 JTOMV SS - AAVN/1d3a0 €B000Z661 €80002661 80007661 80007661 80002661 6S610r661 6S610r661 €80002661 6S610r661 6S610r661 €B000z661 6S610r661 6S6L0r661 €80002661 80007661 80002661 6S610r661 6S610r661 €80002661 80002661 80002661 EB000Z661 6S610r661 6S61L0r661 80002661 80002661 80002661 80002661 80002661 80002661 6S610r661 80002661 €80002661 €80002661 €80002661 EB000Z66! €80002661 80002661 80002661 80002661 €80002661 6S610r66! 6S610r661 80002661 80002661 €80002661 80002661 80002661 80007661 6S610r661 €B000Z661 e©8000z66t 80002661 80007661 80002661 6S610r661 6S610r66! 80002661 80002661 80002661 80002661 80002661 6S610r661 6S610r661 80002661 80002661 80002661 €B000Z661 ©80002661 80002661 6S610r661 6S6 1066) 80002661 80002661 80002661 €B000Z661 €e000c661 XAYN SN) AAYN S11) AAYN SN) AVN'S 1) AAYN SN) AAVWN SN) AYN SN) AAYN SN) AAYN SN) AAVN SN} AAYN SN} AAVN SN) AAYN SN) AVN SN MYN SN AVN SN) AAWN SN! AAYN SN) AAVN SN) AAVN S/N) AAYN SN) AAYN SN) AAYN SN) AVN SN) XAYN SN) AAYN SN) AAYN SN AYN SN) AWN SN AYN SN) AAWN SN) AAYN SN AAYN SN) AYN SN) AVN SN AAVN SN) AAYN SN AVN SN) AAYN SN) AYN SN AAVN SN) MAYN SN) AAVN SN AAYN SN AAYN SN MAYN SN AYN SN AYN SN) AYN SN AAWN SN) AAYN SN) MAYN SN AYN SN) AYN SN AAYN SN) AAYN SN) MYN SN AYN SN AYN SN AAWN SN) AYN SN) MVN SN) AYN SN AAYN SN) AAVN SN) AAYN S11) AAYN SN) AAYN SN) AAYN SN) MAVN SN AAYN SN AYN SN AVN SN AWN SN) AAVN SN) AAYN SN) AAYN SN SPOOL-16 SbhO-O1-16 GPO-Ol-l6 GbO-O1-16 SPO O1-16 SPO 01-16 SPO-O1-16 ShO-O1-16 SbO-O1-16 Sho 01-16 SPO-O1-16 SPO-01-16 SPO-O1-16 SbO-O1-16 SpO-O1-16 SPO-OL-16 €90-01-16 €90-01-16 SPO-O1-16 €90°01-16 €90°01-16 €90-01-16 €90-01-16 €90-01-16 €90-01-16 €90-01-16 €90'01-16 €90-01-16 €90-01-16 €90-01-16 €90-01-16 €90-01-16 €90-01-16 €90-01-16 €90°01-16 €90°0t-16 €90°01-16 €90-01-16 €9001-16 €90°01-16 €90-01-16 €90-01-16 €90-01-10 €90-01-16 €90-01-16 €90-01-16 €90-01-16 €90-'01-16 SPOOL 16 €90-01-16 €90°01-16 £90 01-16 GbO-O1-16 SPO-O1-16 SPO-O1-16 SbO-01-16 SPO-O1-t6 SrO-01-16 SPO 01-16 SbO-O1-16 SbO-O1-16 SPO O1-16 SbO-OL-16 SPO O1-16 SbO-O1-16 SPO O1-16 SPO-O1-16 SbO'O1-16 SbO-OL-16 SbO 01-16 SPO-O1-16 SPO-O1-16 ShO-O1-16 SPO-01-16 GbO-O1-16 SPO-O1-16 €90-°01-16 ro) o nN 2° ie) oo) BIS OL dis 9t pis ol Oro lesan Bisel SOS Ot 48y 91 €9p 91 Sp OL pro 825 Ob esor L6y 91 ergot 69p 91 9p 91 Sp ol ebb ot pS Ol ego BISOL eis ot ISO} 60S 91 80S 91 SSb ol ves al 825 91 92S 91 22S 9 905 91 L9b 9b 9p 91 dis aot 94p 91 9p ot Orr OL tps ot ego PISOL his 9b €Lp ol Sep ot esol sol 6Zy 91 vp ot 6rS 91 iS9L GLP OL 9Sb 91 BOS 91 966 91 6p Ol 99P OF ver ol dep or eISaL Zisgot 9Isgol £05 91 68b 91 9p 91 esol 68b OL bes ot 405 91 bisel Lis ot ses ol per gol 99p 91 tos 91 Zig gob bos ot 6p 91 S6el/eh S661 /eh S6fel/e S6/61/2h S62 seaie S6el/el serait serai/et serei/et S6/at/eh S6/Lb/24 S6/LI/2 S6/LI/eL S6/LI/e4 S6/LL/Zh S6/LI/2h S6/Lb/2h G6/LI/eh Ss6Al/el S6Al/el S6/9I/el S6I/el S6Al/el S6/I/el S6aiiet seie S6/Si/el S6/Si/eh S6/Sh/el G6/SI/el S6si/el S6/SI/2h S6/SI/2h S6/Pi/eh S6/PI/21 S6/Ph/eh S6/Pb/eb s6et/el S6et/et S6I/e1 S6EI/e1 S6fEl/eb S6fEL/eL S6/el/el S6/el/eL S6/et/el S6/eN/eh SE/L Ab S6/tb/eb Gest i/eh G6/L Lie S6/O1/eh S6/01/eh S6/O1/21 S6/O1/2L S6/ol/eb S6/Ol/et S6/60/21 S6/60/21 S6/60/21 S6/60/21 S601 S6/60/21 semoet seeo/zl S6/L0/21 S6/L/21 S6/0/21 S6/90/21 S6/SO/21 S6/sO/et S6/SO/21 S6/rO/eb S6EOeL S6EO/Ct S6EO/21 19 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIN SANVHL 19 'NOONO7M3N 8 NOLOHD ‘Y3AIY S3NVHL 10 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'Y3AIY SSNVHL 19 'NOGNO7 M3N 9 NOLOYD 'H3AIY S3NVHL 19 'NOONO7 M3N 8 NOLOYO 'Y3AIY SANVHL 10 'NOONO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD ‘H3AIY SSNVHL 19 ‘NOGNO1M3N 9 NOLOHD 'H3AIH S3NWHL 19 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'Y3AIY SSNVHL 19 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOYD 'Y3AIH SSWVHL 10 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOUD 'Y3AIY SSNVHL 19 'NOGNO7 M3N ® NOLOUD 'Y3AIH SSWVHL 19 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOYD 'Y3AIY SANVHL 419 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIN SSWVHL 419 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOYD ‘Y3AIN SSNVHL 19 'NOONO7 M3N 8 NOLOWD ‘Y3AIY SANWHL 19 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD ‘W3AIH SSWVHL 10 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOHD 'Y3AIH S3WNVHL 19 'NOGNO1M3N ® NOLOUD ‘H3AIY SANVHL 19 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD ‘H3AIH S3NWHL 419 'NOGNO1 MN ? NOLOHD 'Y3AIY SANVHL 19 'NOONO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'Y3AIH SSNVHL 19 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOUD ‘Y3AIY SAWVHL 19 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD ‘H3AIN SSNVHL 19 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOUD 'Y3AIY SANVHL 40 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOYD 'H3AIY SSWVHL 10 'NOGNO7M3N 2 NOLOWD 'Y3AIY SANVHL 19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIY SANWHL 19 'NOONO1 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'W3AIY SANVHL 10 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOYD 'Y3AIH SSWVHL 19 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOUD 'Y3AIN S3WVHL 10 'NOGNO7 M3N ® NOLOUD 'H3AIH SSNVHL 10 'NOQNO7 M3N 8 NOLOYD 'H3AIY SSWNVHL 19 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOUD 'H3AIH SSNVHL 19 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOUD ‘Y3AIH SAWVHL 19 'NOGNO7 M3N ® NOLOHD 'Y3AIY SAWNVHL 19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOUD 'Y3AIY SSNVHL 19 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIH SSNVHL 10 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIY SSNVHL 10 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOYO 'H3AIY SANVHL 19 'NOGNO1M3N ® NOLOHD ‘Y3AIH SSWVHL 19 'NOGNO1 M3N ® NOLOHD ‘Y3AIY S3NVHL 10 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD ‘Y3AIH S3WVHL 49 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOUD 'U3AIN SSNVHL 49 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOHD 'Y3AIN SSNVHL 10 'NOGNO7M3N ® NOLOYD 'H3AIH SSNVHL 410 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOUD 'Y3AIH SSANVHL 10 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOYD 'Y3AIU SSNVHL 19 'NOGNO7 M3N ® NOLOYD ‘Y3AIH S3NVHL 19 ‘NOGNO7 M3N ® NOLOHD 'Y3AIH SSNWHL 410 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOUD 'Y3AIN SSNVHL 410 'NOONO1M3N 3 NOLOWS 'Y3AIY SSNVHL 10 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOHD ‘H3AIY SSWWHL 19 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOWD 'W3AIY SSNVHL 19 'NOONO7M3N 8 NOLOYD ‘H3AIY SSNVHL 19 'NOGNO1M3N 3 NOLOWO ‘H3AIY SANVHL 19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOHD ‘H3AId SSNVHL 19 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD ‘H3AIY SSAWHL 19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOUD 'Y3AIN SSNVHL 19 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIH SSWWHL 19 'NOGNO7 M3N 9 NOLOYD 'H3AIH SSNWHL 10 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'Y3AIY SSNVHL 410 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOUD 'Y3AIN SSWVHL 419 'NOONO1M3N 3 NOLOHO 'Y3AIY SSNVHL 19 'NOGNO7 MAN ® NOLOHD 'H3AIN SSNVHL 10 'NOGNO1M3N ? NOLOYD 'H3AIN SSNVHL 19 'NOGNO1M3N # NOLOUD 'H3AIN SSNVHL 19 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOHO 'H3AIY SANVHL 10 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD '3AIY S3WVHL 19 'NOGNO7 M3N ® NOLOHD 'H3AIN S3NVHL 10 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIH SSNVHL 19 'NOGNO7 M3N 9 NOLOWDO 'H3AIY SSNVHL 419 'NOGNO1M3N ? NOLOUD 'Y3AIH SSWVHL 19 'NOGNO17 M3N 8 NOLO 'H3AIY SSNVHL 19 'NOGNO1M3N 9 NOLOHDO ‘Y3AId SSWVHL 10 'NOGNO7 MAN 8 NOLOHD ‘Y3AIN SSNVHL 19 'NOGNOTM3N ? NOLOHD ‘Y3AIN SSWVHL 19 ‘NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOUD 'H3AIN SSWVHL ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30 A TOMVS3S - AAVN/1d30 ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 STOMV IS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMV3IS - AAVN/1d30. ATOMWSS - AAVN/1d30 STIOMVAS - AAVNW/1d30 ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 ATOMV 3S - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAWN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 SIOMVWAS - AAWN/1d30 STOMV 3S - AAWN/1d30 ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d3G STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVSS - AAVN/1d30 STOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30 STOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVWAS - AAVN/1d3G ATOMVAS - AAWN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 AIOMVAS - AAVN/1d3G ATOMVAS - AAWN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAVN/1d350 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 AIOMVSS - AAWN/1d30 ATOMVSS - AAWN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVW3S - AAWN/1d30 STOMVWAS - AAWN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATIOMVAS - AAWN/1d30 JSTOMV AS - AAVN/1d30 STIOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 AS TOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 SIOMWAS - AAWVN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAWN/1d30 ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVAS © AAWN/1d30 SIOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAWN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAWN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d3G STOMVWSS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVSS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVA3S - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAWN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d3G ATOMV3S - AAWN/1d30 A TOMVSS - AAWN/1d30 ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d50 ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMWAS - AAWN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 STIOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 SIOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAWN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMV AS - AAVN/1d30 STOMWAS - AAWN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 AIOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 SIOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 80002661 80002661 80002661 Ee000z66! Ee000z661 80002661 B000Z661 e8000z661 €80002661 80002661 800066 + €80002661 800066! 8000661 e000c661 €8000Z661 80002661 80002661 80002661 e8000z661 E8000Z661 €B000Z661 80002661 80002661 80002661 €80002661 80002661 80002661 8000661 80002661 €e0002661 80002661 80002661 €80002661 €8000z661 80002661 €80002661 80007661 £80002661 80002661 €B0002661 €80002661 80002661 80002661 €80002661 ©80002661 80002661 8000266) 80002661 80002661 80002661 80002661 €80002661 80002661 80002661 80002661 e0002661 80002661 €80002661 80002661 80002661 €B0002661 €e000z661 80002661 80002661 80007661 80002661 80002661 80002661 80002661 80002661 €80002661 €e000zs6t EB000ZEEE 80002661 €80002661 80002661 sscel eszet zszel eszel Opzel Gpzel oszel tSZeL Lpzer 8reel 6rzeL Pree epceb epzel bezel Oveel LEzEL BEceL 6ecet vecel secel gece cece eecel bezet Oecel 62zeb S2ze pezel Lezer 9eceL eezet 8eceh eezeb bezel ozzer 61ces eze vizel OIzet SizeL e1zer Lyzer eicel e0zet OLcel Lizen 60ze1 POZE 90ZEb sozel LOZEL e0zeh 20zel Lozeb ooze B6LEL 661e1 veLet S6LEL ZBLEL Esler OBLEL delet O6tel (6leb 6eler BBIel deer OBlel cele vale SOLES ecteb iren 2e1eh OzLet SPO O1-16 SPOOl-t6 SbO-O1-16 SPO OL-16 SPO O1-t6 SPO O1-16 SPO O1-16 SrO-O1-16 SpO-O1-16 SpO-O1-16 SbO-O1-16 SpO-O1-16 SbO-O1-16 SbO 01-16 SbO-O1-16 SPO OL-16 SrO-O1-16 SpOol-lé6 SPO 01-16 ShO-O1-I+; SbO-O1-16 SbO-01-16 S¥O-O1-16 SPO-01-16 €90°01-16 €90°01-16 SPO O1-16 Spo olla £90 01-16 €90°01-16 €90°01-16 €90°01-16 €90°01-16 €90°01-16 €90°01-16 €90-01-16 90-01-16 90-01-16 €90-01-16 €90°01-16 €90°01-16 €90-01-16 €90-01-16 €90-01-16 €90-01-16 €90° 01-16 €90°01-16 €90°01-16 £90 01-16 9001-16 €90-01-16 €90°01-16 €90-01-16 €90-01-16 €90°01-16 €90°01-16 €90-01-16 €90°01-16 €90-01-16 €90-01-16 €90 01-16 €90- 01-16 €90° 01-16 €90° 01-16 €90°01-16 SPOOL 16 €90-01-16 SbO-O1-16 SbO-O1-16 SPO-OL-16 SPO-O1-16 SbOOL-16 SvO-O1-16 SPO O1-16 SPOO1-16 SbO-O1-16 SPO-01-16 Sbl Shh o ny o-oco000000000 So re) 001 Ose 0L2 0S2 0S2 052 0Se ,0S2 0S dbp ot OPS OF €ps ob SOL tes or pos ol 92b OL lop ob 6pr OL hep or 2p 91 ero B80 91 8S OL SOL Lis gb 6LP 91 tSh 9b SSO bps ob BiSoL OS 91 pSb OL 80r 91 ves ot PIS OL 9lb ol Or 9 Eb 91 ber ob 6tb OL 86h 91 Z9b Ob BPs ol zeg ot 62S 91 eso bSp ot €0€ Of 9Lp Ot Spo ep ol evo 82r OL L8E 91 82S 9 20S 91 tos 91 88r 91 BIS9oL 805 91 gol So 9Er OF lbp ob zlp ob Orr ol 62h 91 6er ob bey OL t2p ob Ops OL ves OL 9€S 91 ees ot ego eisol 0S 91 29b OL les or 80S OL v6P Ot €Sp 91 verb OL ees ol 92S 9b beg ob 96/S0/10 96/0/10 96/0/10) 96/0/10 96/60/10 96/0/10 96/E0/10 96/60/10 96/60/10 96/60/10 96/60/10 96/60/10 96/60/10 96/20/10 96/20/10 96/20/10 96/20/10 96/20/10 96/0/10 96/10/10 96/10/10 96/10/10 96/10/10} 96/10/10} S6/LE/2h S6/Le/eh S6/LE/Z S6/LE/2h S6/LE/21 S6/LE/eh S6/LE/eh S6/0E/2 S6/0E/21 S6/ee/el S6/62/21 S6/62/e1 S6/6e/e1 S6/62/e1 s6/6e/eh s6eeel seeeel s6Ree/el S6/eeel s6raeet s6fee/el S6/Le/eh S6/Le/eh S6/Le/eh S6/L2/eh s6ae/el s6neel see s6Meel s6eel seneel Sé/Se/el s6/seel s6/s2el S6/seel s6/seel S6/S2/21 SB/p2/eh SB/pe/el S6/re/el S6/reel S6/re/el S6/Pe/eh S6/Pe/eh S6Ee/e1 Se/teyel SE/Le/eh s6/0z/e s6/0z/eh S6/0e/el S6/6I/eh S6/6I/e1 S6/61/2h U3AIN SSNVHL 19 NOONO1M&N 2 NOLOHD Lv Y3AIY SANVHL 10 NOGNO7 M3N ? NOLOUD LV H3AIY SSWVHL 419 NOGNO1 M3N ? NOLOHD Ly Y3AIY SSNVHL 40 NOGNOTM3N 3 NOLOHD LV Y3AIY S3NVHL 410 NOGNO1 MSN ? NOLOHD LV U3AIY SSNVHL 19 NOGNO7 M3N 2 NOLOHD Lv H3AIN SSNVHL 19 NOGNO7 M4N 8 NOLOUD LV H3AIN SSAVHL 19 NOGNO7 M3N 2 NOLOUD LV Y3AIY SSNVHL 49 NOGNO1 M3N 3 NOLOHD LV Y3AIY SSNVHL 49 NOGNO1 M3N 3 NOLOUD LY Y3AIY SANVHL 19 NOGNO7 M3N 3 NOLOHD LV H3AIY SSWVHL 19 NOGNO1 MAN 3 NOLOUD Lv H3AIY SANVHL 419 ‘NOLOYD 8 NOONO7 M3N 'H3AIY SSWWHL 19 'NOLOYD 3 NOGNO7 MSN 'Y3AIY SSWVHL 19 NOONO1M3N 2 NOLOYDS LV Y3AIN SAWWHL 19 NOGNO71 M3N 8 NOLOHD LV Y3AIN SSWVHL 19 NOGNO7 MAN 2 NOLOYS LV H3AIN SSNVWHL 419 'NOLOYD 2 NOGNOT M3N 'Y3AIY SSWVHL 410 ‘NOLOYS 3 NOGNOTM23N ‘Y3AIH SSWWHL 410 ‘NOLOUD 8 NOGNO7 M3N 'Y3AIY S3WVHL 10 'NOLOYD 8 NOGNOTM&N ‘H3AIY SSNVHL 419 'NOLOYD 8 NOGNO7 M3N ‘Y3AIy SSNVHL 10 'NOLOYD 3 NOONO7 MAN ‘'Y3AIY SAWNVWHL 19 NOLOYD 8 NOGNO7 M3N 'Y3AIY SANVHL 19 NOLOYD 3 NOGNOTM3N ‘Y3AIY SSNVHL 19 NOLOUD 8 NOGNO7 M3N 'Y3AIY S3NVHL 19 NOLOYO 8 NOGNOT M3N 'H3AIY SSNVHL 19 NOLOYD 2 NOONO1 M3N 'Y3AIY SANVHL 19 NOLOHD 8 NOGNOT M3N '83AIY SSWVHL 19 NOLOYD 2 NOGNO1 M3N ‘Y3AId SSWVHL 19 NOLOUD 8 NOGNOT M3N 'H3AIY SSWVHL 10. NOLOYS 8 NOGNO7M3N ‘Y3AIY S3NVHL 19 NOLOHD 8 NOGNO1 M3N ‘Y3AIH SAWNVHL 19 NOLOHD 8 NOGNO7 M3N ‘83AIW SSNVHL 19 NOLOYD 2 NOGNO7 M3N 'Y3AIY SANVHL 19 NOLOYD 2 NOONO7 M3N '83AIY SSNVHL 10 NOLOWS 3 NOONO7 M3N ‘Y3AIY SSNVHL 19 NOLOYS 8 NOGNOT M3N 'Y3AIY SSNVHL 19 NOLOWD 2 NOGNOT MSN 'Y3AIY SSWVHL 10 NOLOHS 8 NOGNOTM3N ‘Y3AIY SSNVHL 10 NOLOWD 8 NOGNO1 MSN 'Y3AIY SSWWHL 19 NOLOHD 8 NOGNOT M3N 'W3AIH SSWVHL 10 NOLOYD 3 NOGNO7 M3N ‘Y3AiY SSNVHL 419 NOLOWD 3 NOGNOT MSN 'Y3AIY SSNVHL 19 NOLOYD 8 NOONO1M3N 'Y3AIN SANVHL 410 NOLOWD 8 NOONOT M3N 'Y3AIY SANVHL 10 NOLOYD 8 NOGNO7 M3N ‘Y3AIY SANVHL 419 NOLOWD 3 NOONO7 MSN ‘Y3AIY SSNVHL 419 NOLOHD 8 NOGNOT M3N ‘USAIN SANVHL 19 NOLOYD 8 NOGNOT M3N ‘Y3AIY SSWVHL 19 NOLOYD 2? NOGNOT MSN ‘Y3AIY SSWWHL 419 NOLOYD 3 NOGNO1 MAN ‘Y3AIY SSWVHL 19 NOLOUD 2 NOGNOTM3N 'W3AId SSNVHL 19 ‘NOGNO1 M3N 2 NOLOYD 'Y3AIY S3WVHL 19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOUD 'W3AIN SSWVHL 10 'NOGNO7 M3N 3 NOLOHD 'Y3AIH SANVHL 40 ‘NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOYD ‘83AIY SAWVHL 19 ‘'NOGNO71M3N 3 NOLOHD 'H3AIN SSWVHL 49 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOUD ‘Y3AIY SSNVHL 19 'NOGNO1M3N 3 NOLOHD 'Y3AIY SSWVHL 410 'NOGNO1 M3N 3 NOLOUO 'Y3AIY S3NVHL 19 'NOGNO1M3N ? NOLOWD 'H3AIN SSWVHL 10 'NOGNO1 M3N 9 NOLOHD 'Y3AIY SANVHL 410 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOHO 'Y3AIY SSNVHL 49 'NOGNO1M3N 3 NOLOHD 'Y3AIY S3NVHL 10 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOUDS 'H3/AIY S3WVHL 410 'NOGNO17M3N 8 NOLOYD 'Y3AIY SSWVHL 410 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOUD 'Y3AIY SSWVHL 19 'NOGNO1M3N 2 NOLOYD 'Y3AIN SSNVHL 19 'NOONO1M3N ® NOLOWD ‘H3AIH S3AVHL 19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOHD 'U3AIH SANVHL 19 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOUD 'Y3AIY SANVHL 19 'NOGNO1M3N 3 NOLOHD 'Y3AIW SAWVHL 190 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'Y3AIY SSWVWHL 419 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOHD 'Y3AIY SSWVHL 419 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'Y3AIY S3NVHL ATOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAWN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAWN/1d30 STOMVWSS - AAVN/1da0 STOMVSS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVWAS - AAWN/1d30 SIOMW3S - AAVN/1d30 SIOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 STIOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 AJTOMVWSS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 JTOMV3S - AAWN/1d30 ATOMV3S - AAVNW/1d3G STOMVAS - AAWN/1d30 ATIOMVAS - AAWN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAWN/1d30 ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVWAS - AAWN/1d30 ATOMV 3S - AAVN/1d30 ATOMWAS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 AIOMVAS - AAWN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAWN/1d30 ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d3G ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 A TOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 STOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 JIOMVWAS - AAWN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAVN/1d 50 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAVI/1d30 ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d350 A TOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMV3S - AAWN/1d30 ATOMVWSS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVSS - AAWN/1d30 STOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 SIOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 SIOMVWAS > AAWN/1da0 AIOMWAS - AAWN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS = AAVN/1d350 STOMVAS - AAVNW/1d30 ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 JTOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVWAS * AAVN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAVN/1d3G0 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 SIOMVSS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d3G ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30 SIOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 STOMV3S - AAVN/1d3G STOMV3S - AAVN/1d3G STOMVAS » AAVN/1d30 SIOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30 AIOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d350 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 SIOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMWAS - AAVN/1d30 EB000ZE6! €8000z66! 80002661 80002661 80002661 80007661 Ee000z661 80002661 80002661 B000Z661 80002661 €8000z661 EB000Z661 8000266! €80002661 €80002661 80002661 80002661 800066) €B000Z661 B000Z66t 80002661 80002661 ©8000766! €80002661 80002661 80002661 80002661 €8000z66! 80002661 €8000Z661 80002661 8000266! €e000Z661 80002661 ©e000z661 €e000z661 €e000z66+ €B000z661 80002661 80002661 8000266! 80002661 80002661 E€B000Z661 80002661 80002661 B000z661 €B000Z661 EBO00ZE6! 80002661 80002661 80007661 80002661 ©8000266' €B0002661 B000266) EB000Z661 e€8000z66! 80002661 €B000Z661 80002661 80002661 80002661 B0002661 €e000z661 80002661 80002661 80002661 €80002661 80002661 B000z661 80002661 €80002661 80002661 80002661 €80002661 SrO-O1-16 €90-01-16 €90°01-16 €90-01-16 SpO-01-16 SPO O1-16 SPO O1-16 SpOOl-16 €90- 01-16 SPO O1-16 €90-01-16 SPO-O1-16 €90-01-16 SbO-O1-16 €90°01-16 €90°01-16 SPO O1-16 SpO-01-16 SrO-01-16 €90°-01-16 SPO 01-16 €90-01-16 SPO-O1-16 €90-01-16 €90- 01-16 SPO O1-16 €90-01-16 €90°01-16 €90° 01-16 €90°01-16 €90- 01-16 €90°01-16 SpO-O1-16 SPO 01-16 SPO-O1-16 SPO 01-16 €90-01-16 SrO-O1-16 SPO-01-16 SPO-O1-16 Sho 01-16 SPO 01-16 SPO O1-16 €90-01-16 €90-01-16 €90°01-16 90-01-16 €90°01-16 €90-01-16 €90°01-16 €90° 01-16 €90 01-16 €90-01-16 SpO-01-16 €90°01-16 €90°01-16 €90-01-16 €90°01-16 €90°01-16 €90-01-16 €90-01-16 €90°01-16 €90° 01-16 €90-01-16 €90°01-16 €90-01-16 £90°01-16 €90-O1-16 SPO-01-16 SPO O1-1E SPO-01-16 SbO-O1-16 SPO-O1-16 SPO O1-16 SPO 01-16 SbO-O1-16 SpO-O1-16 Shh Sb Shb SPL Shh SPL SPL Shh ShL SPL 6r 686 er sor Srey 798 F Pla b bol bp 68> esl 206 b fol b I6p 808 b 68 685 868 b 606 » 806 > Obl b 806 b 968 b S06 b SSO 'b £08 6 868 > Leey ese > 668 blly 206 9 906° OL PF 468 > cle b 6S8'b 668 > 98 Fy 828 b Silv tee ph Sle 606 b €slb €06 b 106 b “glo oP 498 F S06 b LSt eee 688 b 906 b Bile 206 b rea b 968 > S68 b lL ¢ ee b ebb dsl S08'P 658 b 198 988 F 68h 6+ 668 F $06 b t6a> 208 6 9s8 y bil b Sle selp Ser ot ep ot evo eyot pip ot @rsoL ers or 6eS OL eg or £05 9 Spool dbpor 6€r OL ey ol poL 6e 91 bes ot gtsaol 905 OF 86h 91 Zp ob dsp 9b 9Sb OL €2p OL bbe OL 86E 91 dest ves 91 ees ol lesan 86h 9 8b 91 Ppp OL PEP OL 6ep Ot bop Ob 69€ 91 6rS 91 dvs gt eps ot BES 91 elsor 20S OL 86> 91 9SP Ot Ser ol evga €2p or cp or 6lp el psa €ps gol ces ot BiSoL OS 91 es 9b 96r 91 4Op 91 cep ob OPS OL 625 04 46> 91 ep ot tp on SOP ot sesol 6IS9L ersor €0p 91 “lb 9t esp ol cep OL depot 2p ot eps or 2uS ob sep 9oL Sid 96/L1/10 96/L1/10 86/L1/10) 96/L1/10 96/L1/40 96/91/10 96/91/10 96/91/10 96/91/10) 96/91/10) 96/91/10 96/91/10 96/91/10 96/91/10 96/91/10 9691/10 96/S1/10) 96/51/10 96/51/10 96/S1/10 96/51/10 96/51/10 96/51/10 86/51/10 96/S1/10) 96/51/10) 96/F1/10) 96/r1/10 96/r 1/10 96/h 1/10 96/h 1/10 96/r 1/10} 96/F 1/10) 96/> 1/10) 96/F 1/10) 96/P 1/10) Q6/b 1/10 96/01/40 96/E1/10 96/61/10) 96/E1/10 96/E1/10 96/61/10 96/61/10 96/1/10) 96/E1/10 96/61/10) 96/1/10) 96/61/10) 96/01/10) 86/21/10 96/21/10 96/21/10} 96/21/40} 96/21/40) 96/14/10) 96/14/10 96/11/10) 96/01/10 96/60/10 96/60/10 96/60/10 96/60/10 96/60/10 96/60/10 96/80/10 96/20/10) 96/20/40) 96/20/40) 96/90/10) 96/90/10; 96/90/10) 96/90/10) 96/90/10} 96/90/10) 96/50/10 96/50/10} Y3AIY SSWVHL Y3Ald SSNVHL Y3AIu SSWVHL Y3AId SSNWHL Y3AIY SSWVHL Y3AIN SANVHL Y3AIN SSNVHL W3AId SSWVHL SAIN SSNVHL Y3AIY SSWVWHL Y3AIY SSNVHL Y3AIN SSNVHL Y3AIH SSWVHL Y3AIN SSWVWHL Y3AIN SSWVHL Y3AIN SSNVHL Y3AIN SANVHL Y3AIN SSANVHL Y3AIH S3WVHL Y3AIN SSNVHL Y3AIY S3WVHL Y3AIH SANWHL Y3AIY SSWVHL Y3AIN SSNVHL Y3AIN SSNVHL Y3AIY SSNVHL Y3AId SSNWHL Y3AIN SSNVHL Y3AIN SSWWHL Y3AIN S3WWHL Y3AIW SANVHL Y3AIN SSWVWHL YSAIW SSWWHL Y3AIN SSWVHL Y3AIY SSNVHL USAIN SANVHL Y3AIN SSNVHL Y3AIW SSWWHL Y3AIW SSNWHL Y3AIy SSWWHL Y3Ald SSWWHL Y3AIN SSWVHL Y3AIN SAWVHL Y3AIy SSWVHL YSAlY SSWVHL SAIN SSAVWHL Y3AIH SSWWHL Y3AIY SSWVHL Y3AIY SANVHL Y3AIY SSWVHL Y3AIY SANVHL Y3AIN SSNWHL Y3AIN SSNVHL Y3AIN SSWVHL Y3AIN SAWWHL Y3AIY SSNVHL Y3AIH SANVHL Y3AIY SSNVHL Y3AIY SSNVWHL Y3AIY SSNVHL Y3AIY SSNVHI Y3AIY S3WVHL Y3AIN SANVHL Y3AIY SSWVHL Y3AIW SSWVHL Y3AIN SSWVHL Y3AIy SSNVWHL Y3AIN SANVHL Y3AIN SSWVHL Y3AI SANVHL Y3AIY SSWNVHL Y3AIY SANVHL Y3AIY SSNVHL Y3AIN SSWVHL 419 NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOYS LV Y3AIN SSWVHL Y3AIb SSNWHL Y3AI¥ SSWVHL ATOMV3S - AAVN/Ld30 ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d350 SIOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVA]S - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 A TOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d3G ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d50 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAWN/1d30 ATOMVIS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d3G JTOMVIS - AAVN/1d3G STOMVS3S - AAVN/1d30 STOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 ATIOMVSS - AAVNW/1d30 STOMVSS - AAVN/1d350 STOMVAS - AAWN/1d30 ATOMVIS - AAVN/1d3G0 STOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30 A TOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30 J TOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAWN/1d30 ATOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAWN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVNW/1d30 ATOMV3S - AAWN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS * AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAWN/Ld30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVWAS - AAWN/1d30 ATOMWAS - AAWN/1d3d STOMVA3S - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d3G ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 A TOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 A TOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 A TOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 AIOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30 SIOMWAS - AAWN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAWN/1d30 ATOMVW AS - AAWN/1d30 AYOMV 3S - AAVN/1d30 SIOMVAS - AAWN/1d30 STOMVSS « AAWN/1d30 STOMVAS * AAWN/1d30 ATOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMV 3S - AAVN/1d30 SIOMVAS - AAWN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVWSS * AAVN/1d3G ATOMVAS + AAVN/Ld5G ATOMV IS - AAVN/Ld30 SIOMVIS - AAWN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAVN/1d350 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d3G STOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 A TOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 SIOMVAS - AAVN/Ld30 AIOMWAS - AAWN/1d30 ATOMVWAS - AAWN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30 SIOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d3G ATOMV3S * AAVN/1d30 STOMVW3S - AAWN/1d30 AIOMVWAS - AAVN/Ld30 €8000z66' 80002661 80002661 80002661 €80002661 €80002661 €80002661 €80002661 80002661 80002661 EB000ZEE! 80002661 80002661 80002661 €80002661 80002661 8000766! 80002661 ©8000Z661 €80002661 80002661 80002661 80002661 €80002661 €80002661 EB000766+ 80002661 80002661 80002661 80002661 80002661 ee000z661 80002661 ©80002661 8000661 80002661 80002661 €80002661 €80002661 €80002661 ©B000c661 80002661 80002661 80002661 €80002661 €80002661 80002661 €e000z661 €8000c661 80002661 80002661 80002661 80002661 €80002661 €80002661 80002661 80002661 80002661 80002661 80002661 €80002661 80002661 80002661 €80002661 80002661 €e000z661 ©80002661 80002661 80002661 80002661 80002661 €80002661 80002661 80002661 80002661 8000266) €B000c661 S6rEL 6erel C6rEL E6reL EOSEL SISEL orses biSeL OOSEL vOSEL EISeL SOSEL cIceL coset 60SEL BOSEL PISEL 6iseL BISEL seset beseb ozseL “eset cuSet QLSEL ecseb Lesel Oesel Gece veSel ZESeL LESEL SESEL gece csel 6eseL Seset SbSEL OpSEL \pSet PSE vesel ISceL 6PSEL 6esel gesel OPSEL LeSeEL epset CrseL eSSet esse SSSEL OSset Qpsel ySSEI LSSEL 9Ssel 6SSEL coset S9SEL e9sel O9Sel Loset 8SSEL pOSEL g9Sel d9Se1 e9SEt Odset 2LSEb bLSEb SLbEL 9Lvel 9SeL vLSEL SiSet SbO-O1-16 SPO-O1-16 SPO O1-I6 £90°01-16 €90°01-16 €90°01-16 €90°01-16 €90°01-16 €90° 01-16 €90 01-16 €90-01-16 €90°01-16 €90-01°16 SpO-01-16 SPO 01-16 £90-01-16 SPO OL-16 SPO O1-16 €90°01-16 SpO-O1-16 €90- 01-16 SbO-O1-16 €90°01-16 SPO 01-16 SPO-O1-16 €90-01-16 €90°01-16 SPO-01-16 ShO-O1-16 SPO-O1-16 SPO O1-16 €90-01-16 €90°01-16 €90-01-16 €90°01-16 SPO O1-16 €90-01-16 €90°01-16 €90°01-16 €90-01-16 SbO-O1-16 ShO-O1-16 SPO-O1-16 SpO-O1-16 SpO-O1-16 SPO O1-16 €90°01-16 €90-01-16 SpO-Ol-16 SPO O1-16 SPO-O1-16 €90°01-16 €90-01-16 SPO O1-16 SvO-01-16 €90° 01-16 €90°01-16 €90°01-16 €90-01-16 SbO-O1-16 SPO OL-16 £€90-01-16 Sv0-01-16 €90°01-16 €90- 01-16 SPO O16 €90° 01-16 ShO-O1-16 €90-01-16 90-01-16 €90-01-16 €90°01-16 €90° 01-16 SPO-O1-16 90-01-16 SPO O1-16 €90:01-16 006 008 Llp 9b esp Ol cer or tpl tp ol ee OL ee ol bSoL (4-3) } 6h ob 6h 91 bb Ot bb OL ble ot Pee ot eo ves ot Sos 91 Or ol bSh OL SPO pr OL br OL 60p 91 e6E9t 6e 91 4991 PS 9b Les ot €0S 91 e9p 91 po tp ot pol esol Sisal sol Sol 6r 91 OPO ebb Ot €6€ OL 9BE OL bee OL cps 91 tes ol 9p gl 9p OL tip ot 80r OI e6E Ot segl “£g91 69591 69S 91 dy ob lp ob dy or 9p 91 “Spot 6Eb 91 er ol sos ot 9s ol 9s 91 6rS 91 Sol ves a1 esol esot dpot yo. esol 905 91 gor dsp al bro 96/52/10 96/S2e/10 96/92/10 96/52/10) 96/92/10) 96/52/10 86/52/10 96/r2/10 96/62/10 86/P2/10 96/2/10 96/72/10) 96/r2/10 96/2/10) 96/r2/10 96/¢2/10) 86/62/10 96/€2/10) 96/Ee/10 96/2/10 96/62/10) 96/62/10 96/62/10 96/2/10) 96/E2/10 96/67/10 96/22/10 96/22/10 96/22/10} 96/2e/10 96/22/10) 96/22/10 96/22/10 96/22/10) 96/12/10 96/12/10) 96/12/10 96/12/40) 96/12/10) 96/12/10) 96/2/10 96/12/10 96/b2/t0 96/be/10 96/02/10 96/02/10) 96/02/10 96/02/10 96/02/10 96/02/10 96/02/10 96/02/10) 96/61/10 96/61/10) 96/61/10 96/61/10 96/61/10) 96/61/10 96/61/10 96/61/10 96/61/10 96/61/10) 96/81/10) 96/81/10) 96/81/10 96/81/10 96/1/10 96/81/10 96/81/10 96/81/10 96/81/10 96/81/10 96/Lb/10 96/L1/10 96/21/10) 86/L 1/10) DO/LI/10) Y3AIY SAWVHL Y3AIN SSNVHL Y3AIN SSNVHL Y3AId SSNVHL Y3AIY SSNVHL Y3AIY SANVWHL Y3AIN SSNVHL Y3AIN SSNVHL SAIN SSWVHL Y3AIN SSNVHL Y3AIN SSNVHL Y3AId SAWVHL Y3AIY SSWVHL Y3AIN SSWWHL Y3AIH S3WVHL Y3AIY SSWVHL Y3AIY SSNWHL Y3AIY SSNVHL Y3AIN SSWVHL Y3AIY SSWWHL Y3AId SAWVHL USAIN SSNVHL Y3AIN SSWVHL Y3AIN SSWWHL Y3AIY S3WVHL U3AIY SSNVHL Y3AId SAWVHL SAIN S3WVHL Y3AIU SSNVHL Y3AIN SSWVHL Y3AIN SSNVHL Y3AIN SSWVWHL Y3AIN SSNVHL Y3Aly SSWVHL Y3AIy SSWWHL SAIN SANVHL Y3AIN SSAWHL USAIN SSNVHL Y3AIN SSWVHL Y3AIN SSNVHL Y3AIN SSWVHL Y3AIM SSWVWHL Y3AIN SSWWHL Y3AIY SSNVHL Y3AIN SSNWHL Y3AIN SSWVHL Y3AIN SSNVHL Y3AIN SAWVHL Y3AIN SSNVHL Y3AIY SANVHL Y3AIY S3NVHL Y3AI4 SSWVHL Y3AIY SSNVHL Y3AIN SSNVHL Y3AId SSWVHL Y3AIN SSNVHL Y3AId SSANVHL Y3AIN SAWVHL Y3AId SSWVHL Y3AIN SSWVHL Y3AIN SSWWHL Y3AIY S3WVHL Y3AIY SSWVHL Y3AIN SSAVHL Y3AIN SSWWHL Y3AI8 SSNVHL Y3AIW SSWVHL Y3AIX SSWVHL Y3Ald SSWWHL Y3AIN S3SWVWHL Y3AIy S3WVHL Y3AIy SAWVHL Y3AIN SANVHL Y3AIY SSNVHL Y3AIY SSNVHL Y3AIY SSWVHL UAL SAAWHL AIOMVAS - AAVN/1d3G ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d50 SIOMVAS - AAWN/1d30 STOMVSS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 JTOMV3S - MAvN/1d30 ATOMV3S * AAWN/1d3G STOMVW3S « AAVN/1d30 SIOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 SIOMVAS * AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVA3S - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAWN/1d30 ATOMVSIS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVWAS - AAWN/1d3G0 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 AS TOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/Ld30 A TOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 SIOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 SIOMVWAS - AAVN/1d 5G AIOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d 3G ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 ATOMV3S - AAWN/1d30 SIOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 STOMYVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d 30 STOMVWAS - AAWN/1d30 SIOMVAS - AAWN/1d30 AIOMVSS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMWAS * AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 AS TOMVAS * AAVN/1d30 ATOMVWAS - AAWN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d3G0 AS TOMV 3S - AAVN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVSS - AAWN/1d30 STOMVSS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AVN/1d30 ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d 30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d3G STOMVAS - AAVN/1d350 ATOMVWAS - AAWN/1d30 SIOMVAS - AAVNW/1d30 ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 AIOMVWAS = AAWN/1d30 STOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 SIOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 STIOMVAS - MVN/1d30 ATOMV 3S - AAVN/1d30 SIOMVAS - AAWN/1d30 ATOMV3S * AAVN/1d30 ATOMVWAS * AAVN/Ld30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVWAS = AAWN/1d30 ATOMVWAS - AAWN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d3G ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVIS * AAVN/1d30 AIOMVAS - AAVN/ 1d 30, €80002661 €80002661 €8000z661 €80002661 E€B000Z661 E80002661 80002661 80002661 80002661 €80002661 80002661 80002661 80002661 80002661 80002661 €B000zE6! €80002661 €8000Z661 80002661 80002661 8000266! e8000z661 €8000z661 €B000Z661 €80002661 80002661 80002661 €e000z661 80002661 80002661 80002661 80002661 80002661 80002661 80002661 80002661 €80002661 €80002661 80002661 80002661 80002661 €B0002661 80002661 80002661 €80002661 8000766) 80007661 80002661 B000Z66) 80002661 80002661 E€B000Z661 B000Z661 ©B000Z661 €B000Z661 80002661 80002661 80002661 80002661 80002661 €80002661 80002661 80002661 €B0002661 80002661 80002661 €e000z661 €80002661 B000Z661 EB000Z661 ee000z661 €80002661 80002661 80002661 80002661 80002661 80002661 SOPEL OLPeL 6OvEL €Orel vOPEL 8Orel 66EE1 BPEL €2pe Cbpes SIPEL ecpeb PIPE 9ZPeEL OPEL 6IVEL Level Gere Lever CEvEL pores Servet Ofrel O2rel bevel SEreL bPpeL BErel Level OPPEL SPrel CrPrel 6EreL ObPeL Lerel OSPEL 8Prel eSPelL HSPEL 6SPEL OSPEL SSPEL ESE PSPEL dspet Orel SOpeL BSPeL corel OPEL SOPEL POPE BLPEL ELpel Zerel bZpel LOvEL B9PeEL OOPEL bLPEL 69reL Lheh terel Liver OBrel Orel 6LvEL SPE vere Eerel OPEL BBPEL 86PEL \6re PEPE L6PEL SBPEL AAWN SOLO rE 910-LO-b6 910106 SIO 10 r6 SIO 10 r6 810 10 r6 B10 10 Fs BIO lO rs BIO 106 €90°01-16 1€0-01-16 €90-01-16 €90'01-16 SPO-O1-16 SbO-0!-16 €90-01-16 €90-01-16 90-01-16 €90-01-16 €90°01-16 SrO- 01-16 SPO 01-16 SPO-O1-16 €90°01-16 €90°01-16 €90-01-1¢ 90-01-16 €90°01-16 40-01-16 €90-01-16 LEO-O1-16 SPO-O1-16 SPO-O1-16 €90°01-16 SbO-Ol-16 €90:01-16 €90°01-16 €90°01-16 €90-01-16 €90°01-16 €90-01-16 €90°01-16 1€0-O1-16 4E0-01-16 €90°01-16 €90-01-16 €90°01-16 €90-01-16 €90°01-16 SPO 01-16 SPO-O1-16 SrO-O1-16 SPO-O1-16 SPO 01-16 SPO O1-16 SpO-O1-16 SbO-O1-16 SbO-O1-16 €90°01-16 €90°01-16 €90°01-16 €9001-16 €90-01-16 €90°01-16 €90-01-16 €90-01-16 €90-01-16 SrO-O1-16 as d2gab eat ze eh ceo ee ot ce ot feet eo door 6p 91 OP OL 9p OL Or ol 6rr OL Sep Ot tpoL pol 6E 91 6e 91 4591 69591 g9S Oo eas ot 9s 9l SSOL Sol 6 91 by OL ser ol er ot 9se 91 pss ol 625 91 sol L6r 91 8p el 8p ol Pot ero Spo PhO cr oL SOP Ot 26E Ot eso 6r 91 6P 91 9lr ot eZp ot brol vol esol sol 6r 91 6p 9L €Sp OL Sp ol be OL Bip OL 90> 91 6E Ot ses ot Sis or sgt ss9oL €S 91 86r 91 6r9L OrgoL Spo bro “S94 So Sol gol sol rer ol 96/51/10 96/P 1/10 96/r1/10 96/E1/10 96/61/10) 96/61/10 96/01/10 96/01/10 96/60/10 96/1€/10} 96/1€/10) Q6/bE/40 96/LE/10 96/1E/10 96/LE/10 96/1/10 96/1E/10 S6/LE/10 96/1E/10 96/0€/10 96/0€/10 96/0€/10 96/0€/10 96/08/10) 96/0€/10) 96/0€/10 96/0€/10) 96/08/10 96/0€/40 96/08/10 96/62/10) 96/82/10 96/82/10) 96/22/10) 96/L2/10 96/22/10) 96/22/10 96/2/40 96/L2/10 96/22/10 96/2/10 96/L2/40 96/22/10) 9692/10 9692/10 USAIN SSWVHL Y3AIY SSWVHL Y3AIY SSNVHL Y3AIN SSWVHL Y3AIY SSNVHL Y3AIY SSNVHL Y3AIY SSWVHL Y3AIN SSAWHL Y3AIY SSNVH1L USAIN SSWVHL Y3AIW SAWVHL Y3AIN SSNVHL Y3AIN SSWVWHL Y3AIY SSNVHL Y3AIY SSAVHL Y3AIY SSNVHL Y3AIY SSWVHL Y3AIY SSNVHL Y3AIY SSNVHL Y3AIY SANVHL Y3AIY SSNVHL Y3AIY SSWWHL Y3AIY SSWWHL Y3AIN SAWVHL Y3AIH SAWVHL Y3AId SAWVHL Y3AIY SSNVHL Y3AIY SSWVHL Y3AIY SAWVHL Y3AIY SSWVHL H3AIYN SSNWHL Y3AIY SANVHL YSAIY SAWVHL Y3AIYN SSWVHL Y3AIY SSNVHL Y3AIN SSWVHL Y3AIN SSNVHL Y3AId SSWVHL SAIN S3WVHL Y3AIY SSNVHL Y3AIY SSWWHL Y3AIY SSNVHL Y3AIX SSNVHL Y3AIY SSNVHL Y3AIN SSWWHL Y3AIY SSNVHL Y3AIW SANVHL Y3AIN SSNVHL Y3AIY SSWNVHL USAIN SSWVHL Y3AIY SSNWHL Y3AIN SSWVHL Y3AIY SANVHL Y3AIY SSNVHL Y3AIY SAWWHL Y3AIY SSNVHL Y3AIY SSNVHL Y3AIY SSNVHL Y3AIY SSNVHL Y3AIY SSNVHL Y3AIYN SSWVHL Y3AIH SSNVHL Y3AI¥ SSAVHL Y3AIY SSNVHL Y3AIY SSNVHL Y3AIY SSNVHL Y3AIN SSWVHL Y3AIH SSNVHL Y3AIN SSWVHL Y3AIN SSNWHL Y3AIN SSAVHL Y3AIN SSWWHL Y3AIY SSWVHL Y3AIy SSNVHL Y3AIW SSAVHL Y3AIN SSWVHL Y3AIN SSWVHL STOMVS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 SIOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 STOMVSS - AAVN/1d3G ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAVNW/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 JIOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMV SS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAWN/1d30 STOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 JTOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d350 ATOMV3S - AAVNW/1d30 A TOMVSS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 STOMV3S > AAVN/1d30 ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 ATOMV3S - AAWN/1d30 ATOMVWAS - AAWN/1d30 SIOMVAS - AAWN/1d30 ATOMW3S * AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMWAS > AAVN/1d30 A TOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30 STOMWSS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVIS - AAWN/1d30 A IOMWAS - AAWN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAWN/1d30 STOMVSS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 STOMV3S - AAWN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAYN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAWN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVWAS - AAWN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMWAS - AAVN/Ld30 ATOMV3S - AAWN/1d30 ATIOMVAS - AAWN/1d30 SIOMVWAS * AAVN/1d30 SIOMWAS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVWAS - AAWN/1d30 AIOMVWAS * AAWN/1d30 AIOMWASS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVS - AAVN/1d30 SIOMV3S - AAWN/1d30 AIOMV3S - AAWN/1d30 STOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVWAS - AAWN/1d30 STOMVW3S - AAWN/1d30 STOMVWSS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAWN/1d30 STOMVSS - AAWN/1d30 ATOMV3S - AAWN/1d30 AIOMVAS - AAWN/1d30 ATOMVWAS - AAYN/1d30 ATOMVIS - AAWN/1d30 ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVSS - AAWN/1d30 AIOMVWAS - AAVN/Ld30 STOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30 80002661 €e000css! eeo00zs6 + 80002661 80002661 8000766! 80007661 80002661 80007661 €e000c661 800066! eeo00z66! eeo00zs6t €8000z661 €e000z661 €e000zs6+ ©80002661 80002661 80002661 €8000c661 €8000Z661 ©8000¢66! 80002661 e8000z661 €8000z661 80002661 80002661 80002661 80002661 80002661 80002661 80002661 ee000z66 1 eeo0ocsst 80002661 €8000z661 80002661 80007665 €e000zes + e8000z661 80002661 8000661 €B0002661 €8000z661 80002661 E8000Z661 80002661 EB000Z661 €80002661 80007661 €80002661 €80002661 €e000z661 €80002661 €80002661 e8000z66' EB000Z661 €80002661 80002661 e€8000z66t 800066! €80002661 80002661 80007661 €e000z66! 80002661 €8000z661 €80002661 80002661 EB000Z661 €B000Z661 80002661 e8000z661 80002661 80002661 80002661 B000z661 ozsege SLE6EZIL €9001-16 = =M1 EL 0002 €9001-16 M1 eb soe €9001-16 = =M1 eb 0012 €90 01-16 = =MT th Oork €9001-16 M1 wth OOrt €9001-16 = =M1 EL oset €9001-16 M1 et 0012 €90:01-16 = M1 Cw. Oost SPOOl-IG =vWE th OOZt e900l-l16 MI 2b osel e9001-16 = =M1 get 0s02 10-01-16 910 OL 008 4€001-16 310 OF 008 SPOOLI6 =VWF ESL oos! €9001:16 M1 .92b 0002 SPOOI-IG =VWr .ObE SZSL €9001-16 = =M1 .9bb 0091 €9001-16 =M1 CWA 0012 9101066 990 OL 006 9101066 990 01 SC 9O1IOrG O00 Ob 006 €9001-16 M7 .Eb osie E90 01-16 =MT EL 0002 9101066 990 OF Seb SrOOL16 WWF Leet 068t SPOOlI6 =vwr tt 0091 €90°01-16 M1 eb 0002 SPOOL IG =vwr LE bE OOPL 9101066 9900 6 oso €900b-16 = =MI Ob 0001 9101066 990 G6 ose 9010%6 900 OF 006 9101066 990 6 002 9101066 990 Ob 006 9101066 900 OL 006 9101066 990 01 006 9101066 900 OL 006 9101066 900 OF 008 9O1OrE 990 Ot 008 MSS lap OUIN|OA [E10 }, PA Aong Aaen Sr eur ie pef|isodep OWNIOA [BOL 002 96/21/10) 961/10 96/91/10 961/10 96/51/10 Y3AIY SSWWHL SAI SSNVHL Y3AIW SAWWHL Y3AId SSWWHL Y3AId SSWWHL Y3AIN SSWWHL Y3AI8 SSNVHL Y3AId SSNVHL Y3AIY SSWVHL 419 NOLOUD 8 NOGNOT M3N 'Y3AIY SSWVHL 19 'NOONO7 M3N 3 NOLOHD 'H3AIN SAWVHL Y3AId SSAVHL USAIN SSNVWHL Y3AIY SSWVHL Y3AIN SSNVHL Y3AIN SSNWHL ¥3AId SSWVHL Y3AIH SSNWHL Y3AId SSWVHL Y3AId SSAVHL Y3AIY SSWVHL Y3AIY SSNWHL Y3AIN SSWVHL Y3AIN SSNVHL Y3AIN SSWVHL Y3AIY SSWVHL Y3AIY SAWVHL Y3AIY SAWNVHL Y3AIN SSNVHL Y3AIN SSNVHL Y3AI¥ SSNVHL Y3AIN SSNVHL Y3AIY SSWVHL Y3AIY SSWVHL Y3Alu SSNWHL Y3Ald SSWWHL Y3AIH SSWVHL Y3AIW SSWWHL Y3AIY SSWVHL STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 AIOMVAS - AAVN/1d3G STOMVSS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVS3S - AAVN/1d30 A TOMVAS - AAWN/1d30 SIOMVAS - AAVN/1d350 ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS > AAWNW/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVS3S - AAVN/1d30 ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVWAS - AAWN/1d3G STOMVAS - AAVN/1d350 ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 SIOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVW3S - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVAS - AAVN/Ld30 JTOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 A TOMVAS - AAVN/1d30, ATOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30 STIOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAWN/1d3G ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 SIOMVSS - AAV/1d30 STOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30 STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 SIOMVAS - AAVN/id 3G STOMVAS - AAVN/1d3G JS TOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 SIOMVAS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30 ATOMVSS - AAVN/ 1d 30 SIOMVWAS - AAWN/1d50 8000266! 80002661 €8000Z661 €80002661 €80002661 80002661 €B000Z661 80002661 80007661 80002661 B000z661 80002661 €e000Z661 €80002661 €B000Z6E61 B000Z661 B000z661 80002661 80002661 80002661 ©80002661 80002661 80002661 80002661 €e000z661 80002661 e©e000z661 €80002661 80002661 EB000Z661 80002661 B000CE6) €80002661 €B000z661 8000z661 E8000Z661 80002661 €80002661 82rek OSrel bose 66PEL LOSEL SOSEL e2set 69SEL 16261 6izel velet Lyle leet 9Zeeh SLEel eLeel pleel SPlel 6PZeL oOsZel S6tel OOrel isle Libel veret 6erel 6rrel 6Leel SOPEL ezeeb Szeeb ceeel 6zee1 seeel Steel eeeel Ozeel b2ee A6 1996-97 Disposal Season 6S tebe +W Zong 96-VGN eu) e pesodsig ewIn|OA 1e10L Slop «PA Aong 96-VON ey) e pesodsig euINjoA |e}0 1 St0-0l-16 GOGH Ol 0s9 as 02 Bl6r el set ot be 6t Ore 240 Ol€e = L661/€2/S0} SONVYLN3S WNIHVW AWY34 SATVD S10-01-16 GG ot 002 MS OL 926 el 26091 Ip ce Sle elt GS22 = L661/22/G0) JONVYLN3 VNIEVW AYY34 SATV9D St0-0l-16 @Gu Ol os9 Ss Ob 906'b el 681 9r Ve 4 SSS} OSE SSIL 2661/¢2/S0)} SONVYLN3 VNIHVW AWYS4 SATV9D S10-0l-16 8dyu Ol O02 M 08 c86P el 86191 be <4 SSEL Ort OF6 = 2661/12/SO] SONVHILNA VNIHVW AWS SSTVD S10-01-16 Gqy oF 002 Ss SE yS6'P eL gZt9L bb ee Oprt Ste StOL 2661/12/S0} SONVYLN3 VNIEVW AWY34 S3TVD S10-01-16 GOH OF 004 ASS 0€ cheb aL 819} tp <4 O12 v 00ze = =Z661/12/S0) SONVYLNS VNINVW AYHS4 SATV9 Gt0-€0:96 M3L 9 GL OO; 926° 2 246191 bb LAs oor Obee OEt2 4661/20/10) WNININOX90G OILNVIN S10-€0-96 M3L 6 O0e Oot 668 ¥ eZ sseot by ia} 0002 ost 009) 2661/20/10 WNININOXDOGC OILNVIN WNNLY39 dSNI L4VUC_ TOAAD HIG AONGYHS NINONOT O3GDNO7 NIWLV7 OaG1v7 1Sia BWILLSY AWILdSIO 3Wild30 3ivadsid 4193f0uUd VNIHVW AYHS4 SATVD VNIYVAW Adu34 SATVD VNIYVW AWH34 SATVD VNIYVW AdH34 SATVD VNIYVW Adu334 SATV9D VNIYVAW AdY3S4 SSTV9D WNININOX900 SILNVIN WNININOX90” OILNVIN S3SLLIWH3d pEBZO9E6! PEBZOSEEI SE6¥L 96-VON bEBZO9EE) 9E6PhI 96-VON| peecO9661 6E6hl 96-VON pEBZOOEEL SE6rh1 96-VON vEBcO9661 2€6h1 96-VON 2e8c09661 BELPL 96-VON LE8Z09661 ZELhL 96-VON WON LIWNad Gi dWvS AONa A7 1997-98 Disposal Season sl oreo Jej0) uoseas Sz7e60e OSdr 12101 Pafad StO-01-16 gaguscé 65% 008 68 tL Lez Ob by O LSl6€y OvELOZ O 6b OO Ory SEZL BIOL} SOIN 3ONVYLN3 WNINVW 4D VNINVW Adda SAIVS vERZORBEL = #ZOSL S10-01-16 g@ous6 65+ 009 68ry cL Lez Ob ty 0 LSl6Ey BvEL9Z O ZZ OP 622 S 8101268 SQIN 3SONVYLN3 YNINVW S'S VNIMVW ANY3d SIIVS veez70886! = EZ0S S10-01-16 g@qusé sz ler ose 60S’ el pz OF by 0 BSL6Eb Bpelez O 2% Ssst ySEb Spbb LbOLLG6 SGIN SONVYLNE YNINVW 4D VNINVW Audas SAIWS veazoosst 22051 St0-01-16 gau ob gses 00L tis» a ZEz OF ty O LGL6E¥ BveLee O 2 Obp ey OfEZ ZLIOLL66+ SQIN 3SONVYLNS VNINWW 49 VNINVW AYY3AS SAIVS 9£8z00861 20S) StO-O1-16 gau oF zo 008 bos'y cL Sez Ob by O LSL6Eb LvELOt O 22 OvSL zoel SSOL O+O12681 SQIN 3JONVYLNA VNINWW 4 '9 VNINVW AYY34 SAIVS peez09est 02051 SLO--Ob-16 §a0u OF SSeS 0O0L 10S’ cL sez or tb O LGL6Ev LHELBZ O 22 OPE 6L Sphic StOLL66t SQIN SONVYLNA YNINVW 49D VNIMVW AYY3d SAIVS PE8Z0866l = B LOSE Saple 008 le10, palag StO-01-6 gay 8 est 002 els tL Zez ob tp O LSl6eb Opelezr O ZL 60r0868! SOIN AVG ONVISI ANid 19 LHOWA LLSSSOODANNSHS 288000861 47951 StO-O1-16 gau 2 GLobb ost SOS'b el bec or ty 0 OSl6Eb Leelee OL 80r08661 SIN AVG ONVISI SNid 10 LHOVA LLSSSODSNNSHS zes0006s8! 9z9St St0-01-16 gdqu 2 Slob Ost bose ZL Sez Ob tb O LGl6€p Leetez O Lb 80r08661 SOIN AVG ONVISI SNid 190 LHOWA LLASSODANN3HS 288000661 SZ9SI StO-0b-16 gdqu 8 est 002 else aL cez Ob tb O LGl6Eb Brelee OL LO¢08661 SOIN AVG ONVISI ANIld 19 LHOVA LLASSODANNSHS 2880006681 = 79S SLO-O1-16 gau 2 Sel oor Lbpok = ZL 469 Eb bb 0 OSl6Eb OrEZEZ OL 80P08661 SOIN AVE ONVISIANId 1D LHOVA LLASSODSNN3HS 2880006681 ez0St St0-01-16 gdqu 6 g6zz ooe esp (aa zez Ob bb O LGl6eb BrvElez OL SOvO866! SQIN AVA ONVISI SNid 19 LHOWA LLASSOODANN3HS 2880006681 2z9St S10-01-16 dau @ ech 002 S¢7sb @ €zo bb O LSl6Ev BrELEZ OL rOrOR66! SOIN AVG ONVISI BNid 10 LHOWA LLASSODSNNSHS 2880006681 1298S! SI9-01-16 gqu 2 sol Oot i el bZz Or bby O OSl6€b LreloZ O FLO 66h SQIN AVG GNVISI BNid 1D LHOVA LLASSODANNSHS 28800068} 6 10S) 600-01-16 Ody 6 SL°Lez ose tos’ el sez or tb O LSL6Eb LvELOe OO D PLOllest SQ1N AVG GNVISI ANId 10 LHOWA LLSSSODSNN3HS 288000661 E105} 8600-01-16 Ody 6 S62 OOe Sosy cL 22 Ob by O OSL6Eb Lbelez O B €101 2661 SOIN AVG GNVISI ANId 19 LHOWA LISSSODANNSHS 288000661 +h0SI 600-01-16 Ody @ Seer ose 10S’ y cL Sez ob bp O LSl6Eb Lvelee O 9 €1OlL66t SQN AVG GNVISI SNId 19 LHOWA LLASSODSNN3HS 268000661 600S 600-01-16 Ody 8 est 002 SOS'p cL bz ob lb O OSl6Eb LpeI9e OO C1066 SGIN AVG ONVISI ANId 10 LHOVA LLSSSOODSNN3HS 288000661 O10SI 8600-01-16 Ody SL es 002 40s’ (qi Sez ob ty O LGl6eh LeelezZ 0 8 ZLO1 L664 SIN AVG ONVISI ANId 10 LHOVA LLASSODANN3HS 28800066! 800S! 600-01-16 Ody 6 80E OOF esp (qi zez OL ty O LG6Eb eBpelsze 0 9 bLOZ661 SOIN AVG ONVISI ANId 10 LHOWA LLSSSODSNN3HS 288000861 —L00SI 600-01-16 Ody 6 80£ OOP ers aL zez ob bb 0 LGl6€e eBperse 0 9 +40) 2681 SGN AVE GNVISI ANId 19 LHOVA LLSSSODSNN3HS 28800066 9800S 600-01-16 Ody 6 S0E 00r esp el ZEZ OF by O LSl6€h Bperse O 9 bhOb 2681 SQIN AV@ ONVISI ANId 19 LHOVA LLASSODSNN3HS 28800066 F00S 600-01-16 Odd 6 80E 00b 40S’ (qi Sez ob tb O LSL6Eb Lbelsz O 8 0101266) SQIN AVG OGNVISI SNId 1D LHOWA LLASSOOANNSHS 728800066! SOOSI GhO-O1-16 aay 8 S622 ooe vy e #2 Ob bb 0 0 tt) oz O1OLZ68 SOIN AVG ONVISI ANId 10 LHOVA LLSSSODSNN3HS 28800086+ 0005S! St0-01-16 aay 8 S622 OOE Sr cL ez or ly 0 0 0 4 01602661 SGN AVG ONVISI SNid 1D LHOVA LLSSSOOSNN3HS 288000681 —_—*L00S1 a#dsuj jewuidsuy yerq (evWi0A (evo)i0\ UWu0] Bequo7 uiWiey Seq UesO7 uel07 aeq = aus WEN Hala eauad wUWWad ye7 Appendix B REMOTS® Results Bla NL-91 and D/S Mound Complex 1992 ) ) 4 bhb © OS'ZE Spool er 0 z yoEe 4 v< nebeas oql = pez Ss 26608 e asgoe 46-1N 0 0 +20 890 SObt 2€01 1s0 t ZO 0 ¥< e6e1S oqf = =90e ~=—s e808 2 so0e 16-1N ) 0 196 720 786 +6 0 0 ZO be p< |e6eis oqf = s0z~—Ss 26808 q sooe 16-1N 0 ) ee6 €90 ZOl 496 0 0 Zoho p< la6eis ogi = £02 ~—sz6808 e& sooe +6-1N ) 0 0 ) 0 ) 0 0 x x x oq = kez 26808 2 u00e 16-1N 0 0 sey 10 8 szs PP ) 0 £02 O ¥< i aBeig NO | a6e1S ogi = oe@~Ss 26808 q u00e 46-1N 0 ) 892 LeO z62 Sh 0 ) £92 O v< 1eBeis oq = Azz 26808 e@ Ugo 16-1N ) 0 zo 860% SSL 90'S 0 0 poe +f v< i aBeisg NO | aBe1S oqi = =gS0} = 26608 9 auaQgoe 16-1N ft) ft) ser 90 99'p 90¢ 0 0 £92 O € x oq sso = z6608 q auagoe 16-1N ) ) 661 60 9rz rao ) ) yore 0 ¥ 1a6eis oql 250} += z6608 8 auagoe 16-1N 0 0 dpe 940 S98 608 0 0 poe + p< 1eBe\s oq) = Zt =S ss Z6808 9 900€ 16-1N 0 ) 176 0 6€%@b)0 286 6s'8 0 0 yore 4 v< 1 e6e\s og =k Ss 6808 Q 2008 16-1N ) ) 0 0 ) 0 0 ) enz 4 v< x og = bE Ss 26808 e@ 900 16-1N 0 0 969 leo 22 €2'9 0 0 poe 4 v< jeBeis oq} = BEL = Z808 2 m00z 16-1N 0 0 bol e60 Lz 219 0 0 roe 4 r< | e6e1s oa! ze} =. Z6808 q ™00z +6-1N () ) 299 sso 69 seo () 0 p< 1 p< 1eBeis og = gEt_~=—s 2808 e Mm00z 16-1N ) ) ) 0 0 0 0 0 x x x x og = SES 26808 2 MSQ0Z 16-1N ) ) 2Z€0l 8072 +tPhtL £6 ) 0 pOE F p< yebeis ogi = @pE = 26808 q ™so0z }6-1N 0 ) 99h g0€ 29 Zhe ) ) poe Zz v< 1e6e1S og’ = @pE—Ss 26808 & msQ0Z 16-1N ) ) 609 eb L9b 6rsl 0 ) yOE Zz v 1 a6e)s ogi = 90 ~S ss z6808 2 98sgoz 16-1N 0 i) 0 0 ) ) 0 ) x x x x coal = soe = z6808 e esooz 16-1N 0 ) el 490 ©= EEL 9921 be0 z roe Zz p< 1ebeis oq} == 26808 2 s00z 16-1N 0 ) ez} 46 ZO BEEF 9h 0 ft) yoEe | v< 1 e6e1S oq = 60z_~Ss 26808 q so0z 16-1N 0 0 StZ@t 180 = 99.24 Seb ) 0 poe | p< e6eis oq = 802 ~=—s 26808 e sooz +6-7N 0 0 eztt S20 9941 1601 ) 0 poe | p< 1a6e1S oql = be ~SsZ6808 2 mugoz 16-1N 0 ) 2@L Sree 6re +09 0 ) yore 4 ¥ 130NI oq = Shes 26808 q mugog 46-N ) 0 (yl ee 4 2 Lol 0 0 eZ 4 v WeBbeis oq] = @pz_—Ss 8808 & mug0z 16-1N 0 0 bee 80 S68 le ) 0 ez 4 ¥ | e6eis oql = =6sOh = 26808 2 eu0dz 46-1N ) ) 906 eft 296 6r8 0 0 p< 62 v< eBeis NO 1 e6e1S ogi = SOPs 26808 q eug0Z 16-1N 0 0 e901 9F0 1601 Spol 0 0 poe 4 v< abeis NO! e6e1S oql = Oh = 26808 e 98ugoz 16-1N 0 0 80S 60 szs 16 0 0 yOE 0 ¥< 1 e6eiS oq = b@Z_—Ss« 21688 9 u00z 16-1N () 0 ech 680 edt 680 0 ) POE 4 ¥ x og’ = €zz_—s«s 8808 q uo00z +6-1N ) 0 299 SOL 6rL 72h) ) 0 poe 4 p< abeis oq = €z@_—Ss 26808 e@ ug0z 16-1N ) ) Sok 90 6801 ¢Z 01 0 0 poe 4 v< | a6e)$ J: a 4 31°10) 2 8002 +6-1N 0 ) 6Z0l 82 €z2t see ) 0 poe 4f p< 1 a6eig og’ = OZ_—Ss 26808 q 28002 16-1N ) 0 6s'8 iSO 8 ©6sB8 re8 ) ) yOoEe 4} < 1 @BeIS NO I eBeIS oa’ =z =Sss 28808 & 28002 16-1N 0 0 te9 $0 959 so'9 0 0 POE f v< 126e1S oat = bE ~Ss 26808 2 MOO} 16-1N 0 0 SyZL BLL POEL SOLL 0 ) yoe 4 v< Webeis oat = @E_—Ss 26808 e MOOL 16-1N ty) 0 ero Sre LL sz ty) 0 roe Zz Beis oq =. zS€~— 26808 2 MSOOL 16-1N ) ) ft) ty) 0 ) 0 ) x x x x of = ze 26808 q ™soOL 16-1N 0 0 ) 0 ty) 0 0 0 x x x x coal =sbSe.~=—s zeg08 e MSO 16-1N 0 ) €8S 2b 628 Lee 0 ) poe 4 p< 1e6e1s oq = Z0E-—SOs 26808 2 eSQOL 46-1N 0 0 799 =pze «be e8 Ss 0 0 ez 4 C je6eis oq = koe~S Ss 26808 q 8so001 16-1N 0 0 28 Zh €8'8 29L 0 0 ez 4 p< 1e6eis coal = KOE =Ss 8808 e 9sool 16-1N 0 ) sve eb 616 ze2 0 0 £92 0 ¢< aBeis NO 1 86e)S oq = bkz@_=Ss 26808 2 soot +6-1N ) ) 20! 490 e801 166 ft) 0 rE O p< . 1e6eIS oq} = bz 26808 q soo} 16-1N 0 ) zez@ 26 8900 42 Z £02 ) ) zor oF v< 1e6e\S oa =k ~Ss 26808 e soot 16-1N ) 0 zeL ple L8 9 0 ) ez | v< abeis NO 1 a6e1S oq = gz 6808 9 MUQOL 16-1N ) 0 zeg SzhoL slg ) 0 poe f v< 1e6e1S cal = bSZ—Ss BOB q MuoOL $6-1N ft) ) 7a) ee =I BLL ) 0 ez 4 % 11 e6e1S oq’ = Sz ~=—Ss z6808 e MuQO} 16-1N ft) ty) 99b Slt G6 6LE ty) 0 £02 Zz % 1aBas oq) = eSE_~— ss: 26808 2 9UugoL 16-1N 0 ) 79 06 let LL ees 0 ) vOE O ¥< i aBes NO 1 a6e1S ogi = ese = 26808 q eu00} 16-1N 0 ) €66 g€0 2101 626 ) 0 vOE Zz v< 1ebes ogi = gS€_~=—s- 26808 e au0ol $6-1N 0 ) 6bb 940 Leb bhp ) 0 poe 0 v< 1a6e1S og = ozz_—Ss 26808 2 u00dF 16-1N ft) 0 7a Zt Lez Ve ) 0 poe Zz v< x oq = k@_—SSs« 26808 q uook 46-1N ) ) tes Mh 9Lg 99'p ) 0 yore 0 v< tebe oq = tz = 26808 e@ ugot 16-1N ) ) 9656 950 79 89S 0 0 ez 1 p< | e6eis oa = =6€ztt §=—- 26608 } 8001 16-1N ) ) e9e€ 2b €F 90€ 0 0 e072 4 v< 1 aBeis ogi = 2@ztt = 26608 ® 8001 16-1N 0 0 98h 690 125 eb 0 0 ez 41 p< )eBe)s oq] = 22st = 26608 P e001 16-1N ) ) we s¢0 8 sLz oir 0 0 A € 1e6e1S oqf §=6Szt = z6808 9 8001 16-1N t) 0 6Le bh 9b ee () 0 AT p< 1a6e)S oq! bzt 6808 e200 46-1N xew UI-_ ues-w abuey wnuwixeyy WNWIUIW Payaweig yUNDD WNWIXeW) WNWIUIW ssauyoiyL apow ] easy Jay Punogay XOP3Y | evayey pabpaig uolesjauag esawed sise|jopnw soley (1ud) zig uleID aBels jeuolssao9ng japnyi6uo7 epmyeq ishjeuy ew day uoneis —;punow ON Jeo\Boj0\8 0 ’ e esooe be-IN|SEzZO = ZO 0 lee e asooe ON lea\6oj01g 0 668 2 SQDE 16-1N]68 66 66 66 2 so0e ON 1e2)sAUd ) 68 a sone 16-1N]66 66 68 68 q so0e ON yeaisAud 0 66 e —-sQoe 16-1N166 66 66 68 e sooe ON x 0 66 2 -u00e 16-INJO 0 0 ) 2 u00e ON yeashud 0 L q = -ugoe H6-IN|SZ6'0 bt 190 ez el q_ uooe ON jeo\Boj01g ) e -ug0e HO-INISHZL = CBZ Vb LE'€Z e uo0e ON leajskud ) 9 2 eUan0e 16-IN|SS90 680 zo 116 2 auagoe ON ayeulWue}apu} ) 66 q euagoe +6-1N]68 66 66 66 q euag0e ON jeai6oj01g ) € e@ auagoe H6-1N|S08°0 = 90°F sso Zh & auan0e ON leo\Gojo1g 0 9 9 = a00e H6-INJ60€ 97€ 267 66 ly 2 9800 ON jeajo01g 0 ¢ Q 800€ 16-IN|9Z4 9rz 901 sg'ez q 9800€ ON 0 66 e anne 46-IN/O ) ) ) e 9800 ON ! 0 z 2 -M00z 16-1N] p20 bh 8e0 266 2 M00z ON Jeo\Bojo1g ) S q 002 bE-INIS'Z @ze elt ee ee q m00z ON leaiBojo1g ) € e mo0z H6-IN|S8hL = SB L zv0 91 e mo0z ON x 0 66 2 MsQOz 16-IN]O ) ) Lt) 2 ms00z ON jeaiskud 0 9 q_ = _™s00z WE-INISPLZ = -6ZE 1 8662 q mso0z ON jeaiBoj01g 0 e msooz 16-1N] PS} Szz €8°0 12 e Msooz ON leo1Gojo1g ) 9 2 esonz HE-IN|SP2Z OLE eel 8'0E 2 8s00Z ON x ) 66 e asooz 16-IN}O 0 0 ) e oasooz ON jeo\Boj01g 0 ¢ 2 so0z He-IN|8e'0 = 6S 0 4V0 els 2 s00z ON jeo\6oj01g ) S qq s00z 16-1N/8't 202 680 661 q so0z ON ) 9 e —-so0z He-IN]SeBt = =9bz 19} 2g'Sz e s00z ON Jeo\Bojo1g 0 9 2 Munoz HE-IN|SPZE 91 eez £9'>b 29 MuUQOZ ON teo\Boj01g ) 66 q = muo00z HE-IN|SBE'E 29°F V2 90°Lb q mugoZ ON Je\6oj01g 0 6 e muooz HO-IN|SSP'b = €e'S ase 2z'49 e mug0z ON jeaiskud 0 , 2 eugoz HB-IN|SOL} = 46-2 sO 6E EZ 2 8u00Z ON Jeo\Boj01g 0 8 q au00z 16-7N]S8'1 egz zh pS'SZ q eup0z ON jeo\6o/01g 0 6 e eug02 HO-IN|P9% = LOZ 12z hose e eug0z ON leo\6oj01g 0 v 9 -ug0z He-IN|SOB'} «= az 1b ier4 9 u00z ON jea)Boj01g ) 66 q —-uo0z 16-1N|]890 =90'F £0 606 q ug0z ON (ea1Bojo1g ) 66 e —- ug0z 16-1N|66 68 66 66 e ug0g % ON 1eo\Bojo1g ) ¥ 2 8002 H6-IN|]SO9t 202 bh $01 9 3002 ON jeajskud ) Ss q 8002 +6-1N169°0 ral’ 1s°0 68th q 2002 ON yea|6oj01g 0 9 e 8002 H6e-INISS0 =. 9'0 ve0 GL e a00z ON jeajBojo1g ) 66 2 MOOL 16-1N|66 66 66 66 2 OOF ON 1eo\Bojo1g 0 66 e moot 16-1N]66 66 66 668 e moor ON jea16oj01g 0 Ss 2 MSQOL HE-IN|SBEZ «GE ez eze 2 MSOOL ON x 0 66 q_ *sO0} $6-1N/66 66 668 66 q ™sooL ON x ) 66 e msool 46-1N|O0 0 0 0 e MSQOL ON yeaiskud 0 € 2 @sgot $6-N162°0 1 850 $601 2 e@sQ0} x} ON yeaisAUd ) ¢ q 98s00t H6-IN|SOOL = LEZ vOL 96 12 q e8so0} jevayew pabpasp yep Jano pues pasojoo YB] ON 1eaiskUd ) % e asool bE-IN| LZ 4 z yt 6E ez e 9soot deo pues sjuaw6ey \jays awos} ON jea16oj01g ) 66 2 s0dk 16-IN|66 66 66 66 2 S00} deo sadej uy Aejo abiaq) §=ON leo1Gojo1g 0 66 q SOOL $6-1N|66 66 66 68 q soo} psB49q Ul poom adaid deo sjjays ewos epejg sses6 ade) spiospAy ON jea1Bojo1g 0 S e soo 16-1N]9'2 96:2 Tard Lse e soot x! ON yeashud 0 6 2 mugoL H6-IN]S99Z LE 764 £298 2 MuU0O} ewp 9184] ON yeaisAyd 1) 9 q = muool HE-INISOLE 6z'P 764 zoer q mugo} ewp o181) ON leash ) 9 e muool HE-IN|SPOZ = Zh 29 $082 e MudOL ewp 3184) ON jeaishud 0 ¥ 2 aud} HE-IN|SIGL = 22 va 91 92 2 eu0nl Jeauan pues uly} ON ayeuluuajapu} ) Z q eu00! HE-IN|SEP} = ZB'F iy 266} q eU00} x! ON jea1Bojo1g 0 9 e@ eugo} HB-IN|STZ = GLZ SL BL le e auddl edeo — sjuawBey jays yim pues Buy} ~=ON jeo1Bojolg 0 66 2 -ud0d} 16-1N/66 68 68 68 2 u00t S\jays ewWOS sy90J spjospAy puNoi6 pieyy] ON teashd 0 66 q voor 16-1N}66 66 66 66 Q 00h sjuawBey jays yes gdeod sugep eoeyns) ON jeo\6oj01g ty) 66 e -udoh 16-1N|66 66 66 66 e udol cwp Jano deo adeyns uo sugap jueid sjjays BWOS} ~ ON feo1Bojo1g 0 % 4 8001 HE-IN|SZO'Z = PS Z 1st 99°82 4 300} edojs awos ¢deo Ajqissod} ON jea\6oj01g 1) € ® 8001 16-1N|¢9°0 801 90 zo4b @ 300} easojpseypds = gjeuajyew deo] ON leo\6oj01g ) ¢ P8001 KE-IN|SZS't = 0Z 801 6122 P a00t jeuajew deo pues} ON teojsAUd ) S 2 8004 HEIN]SISZ 622 [yard GE PE 2 23001 wp Jano deo es adojs awos| ON teo\6oj01g 0 £ e 8001 L6-IN|S8PL —6zz 890 19°02 e 3001 ueaw wnwixeyy Wnwiulyy ealy eay joy ealy jay sjuawWwoD| OG MO7 JedueqNisig ee~NS }juNDD eueyaW {iso day uoyeis SSaUNdIUL Ady juaeddy day uoneis /puno;w spunow ocoooooooocoocoocoocecococoococcececcocceococoeceocecoCceoeceeeceeceeceeceeceeCeCeeeCeeeCeCeCeOeCeCeOeaeeCeCCcCSe oeoooo00o00c0cceccececCGCcCCCCCCCeCeCeCeCeeecCeeceCeeCCeCCeCCeCeOCCOCCOCCoC OOOO OO eC OO eC OOO COCO PSS Heel POL QiSt Sz Ob ve rl 62S1 0 it) 822 Blt 9 bP 9s'€ 0 0) 9S tb 8€8 bh 6 See 0 ele 0 cSt Laws 8661 c6'9t sooo x = Ss = punoqgay xopay SS@UyIIYL leuajeyy pabpaig 6S°0 ves 8€0 cre sso €29 *S'0 vob ceb elel 120 Ze bt 4 eS eb abt Zu bb ett 26 tLe 9821 eso 9101 660 Leet 490 z90l BEL Lob 180 Ob 440 AA} slo S66 ber €$'6 s60 bt 6h 62€ zat 0 0 lee 6a Lb 901 GLb Ist es fy eo 499 80 ozs Blt S/O} 690 tL 6S0 ce'6 920 69 860 SOE 6S 0 elt cr 0 988 490 96 01 gob Sol Zh SS} Seo te6l 601 PO Lt set OLS} po} Sz ob dub ve rl AA) 62st hh eer £0 622 wh sel 6h 82t 6e1 cg (4-A0) vy byt 9s 901 92th elt 986 80 gS tt 680 8e8 6S°0 brs 664 SBE 0 0 657 ele 990 oe S00 ost t€0 br Lt 801 8661 AAA c6 9b ebuey wnwixeyy wnwiuiW paeweig qui UONeaUag BIAWED SLL 08 819 Z0L Srl Ob bt 1201 or 208 Sto $96 8241 S66 c8'6 6201 See c6 cee 98h Z bere 0 ecs} 6 SP ol toe 0S LULL 468 9S°9 £26 819 402 6b bbe 62 OL cee ere 60 96'8t 4g0 SS9OL cr 0 BL EL 0 198 620 dbet 0 24O'rL 0 ere 0 664 0 819 0 650 0 eer 0 86'€ 0 (a4 0 zo 0 ele 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 NN ooetooo oo oO i“ o on Oo oo Oo 0 0 0 S 1 0 0 t 0 0 0 0 (0) @ b 0 0 0 4 0 0 € 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b t S 0 tt) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 St tt it) 6rL 0 see 0 98 0 0 0 vet 0 Spe 0 99'b S 9 ebb 0 68 90 4 er ZL 0 0 ni ye) S|SejOpnw ZOF ZO EZ poe POE poe yore PoE £2 POE poe vOEe poe yore poe vo|e yore poe pore poe p< poe vOe vOE poe poe POE £2 POE £2 POE Poe £2 EO? £07 p< POE poe poe vole POLE £2 Pore 0% }- pore pore Vole £72 £2 poe yO’ yore POE vole p< POE pore £2 vole poe PoE poe apow Jolew 0 0 0 U b ' t t 0 0 0 0 t ‘ t t t b b b @ 4 ‘ b ‘ 0 0 0 0 b 0 b 0 0 t t ' ' t 1 b t 4 t t 0 4 0 ' 0 0 1 t t b 4 b t t I 0 W (1ud) ezis UleEID p< labels b< 1eBe\s t< | aBeis NO 1 86eIS v< 1 e6e1S p< e6eS b< I <- | a6e)S v< 1abeis p< ne6beis p< 1aBeis P< jabeis b< i e6e1s NO 1 eBeIs t< i abeis NO 1 eBeIS p< il aes NO 1 eb v< i e6eis NO 11 eBeIS v< in e6e1s NO Il eBaIS p< Wabes v< i aBeIS NO Hl eBeIS p< i a6e1S NO Il eBeIS b< nebeas p< I <- 1 e6e1S v< 1 e6e1S p< x p< aBbeis vp x p< x p< 1862S NO Il ebaS p< in BES NO 11 eBe1S b< aBeis NO | ebeIs p< ebeais < 1 Beis b< x p< x p< e6eis p< in aBeIs NO 11 eBeIS v< I <- | a6e1S v< 1a6eS v< jabeis p< I <- | a6e1S v< abeis p< abe p< nebeas p< a6eis P< x p< x v< }e6els P x p< i e6e1S NO | ees p< x v x p< 1e6as b< | abeis p< i aBeIS NO I Beis p< i e6as NO1ebeS p< i aBeis NO 11 eBe1S p< x v< x p< x 7 labels p< x v< 1 aBeis p< nebeis P< 11 aBeIs NWIKeEW) WNWIUIW oq! oq! oq/ oaq/ oq/ oql ql oq! ol oct 621 8z Spt pelt ert z0cb bozb o0zt osol 6r0L SroL chbb Zhbb bbb LEZb 224 gez OStt 6rbh Orbt 4) 2021 ese Lge dsc Ohhh Olt Shh Ort ort SPL €bzb €b2b cheb pSht PSth est 6L2 22h gle 912 402 002 6SI LE2 9€2 bee SOb- volt €Obt 80h 201 901 cb ehh bet osc 6bcl 8r2t 222 922 aBejs jeuoissaoons japnyiGu07 apnyye7 ishjeuy ew, 26808 26808 26808 26608 26608 26608 26608 26608 26608 26608 c6608 26608 76608 26608 76608 26608 26608 26608 76608 26608 26608 76608 76608 76608 26608 26608 26608 26608 26608 z6808 26808 76808 76608 26608 26608 26608 26608 26608 76608 c6608 ¢c6608 26608 26808 26808 26808 26808 26808 76808 76608 26608 26608 26808 26808 c6808 26808 76808 76808 26608 76608 76608 76608 76608 aeg e Bi) 2 89S009 q 88s009 ® 88S009 9 98s009 q @s009 € 9so09 2 =s009 q_ s009 e s009 2 38009 q 98009 e@ 93009 2 assoos q essoos & 9ssoos 2 8aS00S q easo0s ® 8aso0g 9S00S e soos 9 =s00S q_ soos e soos 2 3900S q e i) q oa 2800S 2800S MOOP MO0F e Moor 2 essoor q 8SSO0r & essoopy 2 easQor q 88S00b © 9asooPr 8S00b 3soor 8s00r 9s00b SO0Ob SOOv SOOb UOOP Uu00r U00r 9 eueQor q 8ua00r e auagor 2 2800 300P 800+ MOOE MO00E O00E 2 essgoe q 9ssooe e assgog 2 asooe q _9sgoe powmonovn ov i) moovo ‘day uonels 16-1N +6-1N 46-1N +6-1N 16-1N 16-1N 46-1N 16-1N 16-1N 16-0N 16-1N +6-1N 16-1N +6-1N 16-1N +6-1N 16-1N 16-1N +6-1N +6-1N 16-1N 16-1N +6-1N 16-1N 16-1N 46-1N 16-1N 16-1N 16-1N 16-1N 16-1N 16-1N 16-1N +6-1N 46-1N +6-1N 16-1N t6-1N +6-1N 46-1N 46-1N +6-1N 16-1N +6-1N 16-1N +6-1N +6-1N +6-1N 46-1N 46-1N }6-1N +6-1N 16-1N +6-1N 16-1N +6-1N +6-1N 16-1N +6-1N 16-1N 16-1N +6-1N ealy Jay /punow lea\Bojo1g tt) v 9 4 I6-IN|S9L Dir 460 €p72z leo|60j01g 0 S q 4 16-IN|8b 2 87 (A%4 SOE leo\Boj01g 0 8 e 49 bE-IN|SSZ4 9©68S2 €60 Bez leo8oj01g 0 v a 8358009 }6-IN|S810 8 ©6ZE0 0 ese 9 888009 jeo}6oj01g 0 v q 985009 I6-IN/SZ@ZO0 =€€0 zho Ve q 835009 jea)Boj01g 0 € e 825009 b6-IN/ZE0 z90 (40) 90S & 88s009 leaiskyd 0 66 2 =9s009 +6-IN|66 66 66 66 9 9S009 1ea\6o)01g 0 S q 8s009 16-1Nj]8'0 SO- sso 60 bE q 8sQ09 jeaBojo1g 0 € e 8soog 46-1N] 780 601 6s'0 Lv bt e 8so09 leo)Bojo1g 0 8 a S009 FE-INJSHZ 1 = pS 7 680 62h 2 s009 Jeo\Bojo1g 0 Z q S009 46-1N| 260 seb 690 POEL q s009 1eo)Bojo1g 0 Z e S009 t6-IN}SBZt ASL 801 81 el e s009 leo\6oj01g 0 Z ) 8009 }6-IN|SS6O = bh L 4¢0 bel 2 8009 jea16oj01g 0 9 q 8009 b6-IN|ZZ:0 be ve0 966 q 8009 0 9 e 8009 b6-IN|>'0 £90 440 ess e 8009 I 0 9 2 9ssoos HE-IN|SSS'| = 20°? 601 S602 9 8ssgos jea1Bojo1g 0 6 q 9ssoos 16-IN|62°2 4 891 €9 Le q 8ssooS yeaishyd 0 Z e essoos }6-IN|SOBO 8=ZbL ve0 ee?ch ® essoos jeo\Boj01g 0 S 9 8asg0s }6-1N/*6°0 cyt 90 9LeL 9 88S00S tealsAud 0 € q 98aso0s 16-IN]’S'0 801 0 eel q 888005 x 0 66 e easoos +6-1N|66 66 66 66 & aasgos leash 0 66 q 9soos b6-IN|SZ0 s'0 0 bye q 98soos jea1Bojo1g 0 @ e 9so0s 16-IN|SPbO 650 €0 609 e asoos ayeujuuajapul 0 66 o soos HB-IN|SZZt BBL 4v0 ce lt 3 soos tea1shud 0 66 q soos bE-IN|ZE LE elt zs'0 99'S} q soos jea1Bojo1g 0 8 e soos 16-1N] 28° vb? ot 82 Sc @ soos jeaiskud 0 Z oS) 2800S b6-IN| PPL S6t €60 pL6l 3 9800S jea18o)0\g 0 6 q 6800S HGEIN|SZb2 8 8LbE ert 96'€E q 9800S jeo|6oj01g 0 S e 2800S FE-IN| FEF £072 650 PELL e 9800S lea\Boj01g 0 € a MOOb }6-INJE6'0 bet (AN) As 2 M00r jea1Bojo1g 0 66 q MO00b 16-IN|SE90 60 €0 s98 q MO00Pr teaiskud 0 66 e MO00b 16-IN|9Z 0 €60 6S°0 Se ol e& Moor ieo\6oj01g 0 v 9 8ssodr b6-1N]29'0 c6 0 cb0 606 9 8ssoor jeashud 0 8 Q eSSO0b HB-IN|SEOZ = ELZ vel St ez q 8sso0r jeo)Bojo1g 0 v e essodr +6-1N/6°0 It 620 6221 & 8SSO0b leash 0 4 9 983800 }6-IN] bP 0 90 20 els 9 88S00r leash 0 é q 88S00b b6-IN]#S'0 801 0 bod q 88S00r 1eo\6oj01g 0 € e ee8S00dr b6-IN| 0 sso 920 erg & e8so0r jea1Bojo1g 0 v Pp 8S00b HKE-IN|SZE0 9F0 620 vhs P 8S00r teashud 0 v 2 =9S00r b6-IN]6S°0 sob €10 soe 9 8S00b leo\6oj01g 0 v Q 98S00F b6-IN|9Z 0 cs0 0 6S Q 98S00P leaiBojo1g 0 0 e esoor b6-IN|Zb.0 ve0 0 be? e 8soor jeaysAud 0 66 a SO0r +6-IN] 160 Sel 40 Lech 9 S00r leash 0 66 q SOOp b6-IN]66 66 66 66 q soor lea1Bojo1q 0 € e SO0b b6-IN|SZ bl} 920 24024 e soodr jeaiskud 0 66 2 U00r b6-IN|66 66 66 66 2 u00r jeo)6oj01g 0 66 q Uu00b 16-IN}66 66 66 66 q voor jeo\Boj01g 0 66 e U00r b6-IN/66 66 66 66 e uod0r 1eajsUd 0 66 2 8ua0d0r t6-IN|66 66 66 66 9 eua00r lea1Bojo1g 0 4 q euB00r 16-IN| PEO sso €+0 cle q eus00b leajshud 0 y e s8ue0dr 16-IN] 294 SZ 80 20 €2 © eua00r 1eo180/01g 0 66 9 800¢ 16-IN]66 66 66 66 2 8006 leo,Bojo1g 0 Z q 800b t6-IN|SS60 901 s80 62h 8006 lea16oj01g 0 Z e 8006 E-IN|SOZ? tL §=6e0'? 8e0 boot 8006 teo)6o\01g 0 66 a MOO0E 16-1N}¢ 0 €90 440 vs MOOE jeo1Bojo1g 0 66 q MODE b6-IN|66 66 66 66 MOOE jea\Boj01g 0 66 e MOOE HE-IN|SOZ + = 402% Pe 0 6E 91 MOOE teajshud 0 € 2 9Ssooe 16-1N{66'0 Aa! 9s':0 peel 9 @SSQOE 1eajshud 0 66 Q 9SSO0E HE-IN|SHZ0 ©6014 Peo 486 q assooe jea1Bojo1g 0 + e assooe 16-IN]SP90 S60 Pve0 68 & assooe leash 0 v 9 =98sgoe $6-1N]92°0 zs 0 0 6S Ee 9 asooe leash 0 S q___8s00e HE-IN|SZZ:0 SSF 0 p80 q_9so0e veayy Wwnuwixey WaWiUIW ealy ealy jay day uoneis manent ssauyolul Gdy juaseddy ‘day uonelsg ypunow ealy jay S|UaWWOD) OG Mo7 faoUeGN)sig edeUNS UND eueyeW} SO Blb NL-91 and D/S Mound Complex 1995 eqn ued o}=10 WO ‘WS, Jew qn) BujAeoap ‘2 jua|qwe ye] JMO} ‘WS peddp Sued 0) 50 < Wa ‘WwS yee) WO 2 ‘ued 0) = 10 < WO ‘WS “PAS UO sqeso yuUaY :Le|xodAy ‘jew eqn) dn-paddy !'uad 0} = Jo < Wa judwe ‘ved uj uad 9 6E0 299 829 00°0 te) € MEOE €0 220 9991 lp SH Gel 26/90/60 e 000 000 000 000 |169 8gO OeL 299 000 0 €OF € p< M8EB'10 220 cO9SS 91 IP S1H ve-2l 26/90/60 i) 000 000 000 000 |tlL9 890 L£p9 oss 000 0 ¥< v v< MEEB' 10220 EZ209S 91 Ie SH veel 26/90/60 q peIS J8Y NOIN 000 000 00'0 000 j€c6 620 LE6 806 00'0 0 COP € p< M818'10 220 Z60ZS 91 Ib S1H bé:ct 26/90/60 e peIS J8Y NOIN 000 000 00'0 00;0 J€E9S SPO 98S Ors 00'0 1) COP € v< MZZ8'10220 =vlOZ 9t IP SH 60:8 26/01/60 8 €eB)S J8Y NOIN 000 000 000 000 j99S 190 6S Ors 00°0 0 EP € p< MO088'10 220 €966991 Ir S1H 60:8 26/01/60 p €eIs J9Y NOIN 000 000 000 00:0 |40S 890 los €lb 000 0 ENP € p< M688'102Z0 == L6991 Ih SH 9t:et 26/90/60 i) EBS $8H NOIN 000 000 00:0 000 j6S2 OF€0 ple pe? 000 0 Ep € p< M168 10 220 c69 91 IP SH Sl:2t 26/90/60 q ERIS J8H NOIN 000 000 000 000 |S¢r cé60 tly 6ZE 000 0 EVP € p< M1l68'10 220 2OE69 91 IP S1H St:2t 26/90/60 e ERIS J8H NOIN 000 000 000 000 |j8E tt 20 OS tt 9c tk 000 0 EOP € ¥< M2S0 20220 20ZSS 91 Ie SH O€:21 26/90/60 co) 28S j8Y NOIN 000 000 00'0 000 jrr6 let Sool ¥88 00°0 0 ¥< v ps MItSO'20 220 ~ZB86SS 91 le SH 62:21 26/90/60 q 28S J8Y NOIN 000 000 00°0 000 j68'8 2480 ze6 Svs 00°0 0 b< v b< MtSO'20 220 cpS9S91 tb SIH 82:21 26/90/60 e ZeIS J8Y NOIN 00';0 ~4000 00:0 000 |4tb SPO 6EFb PEE 000 (0) CNP €- p< McS61022Z0 =p802 91 Lb SH S0'8 26/01/60 t) 18S J8H NOIN 000 000 000 000 |jS8ry OFO sos Sob 000 0 EVP € p< M6S6'10 220 SEE0Z 91 Ir S1H 90:8 26/01/60 p 18S J8Y NOIN 000 000 000 000 |86€ 620 EP ese 00°0 0 Ep € p< M1t68'1022Z0 cOLOZ 91 Ir SH eb:ct 26/90/60 i) Leis 8H NOIN 00°0 +000 000 000 |92% 620 O6F lor 000 0 J{E%F € p< MIZ6102Z0 ~OZ91 Ip SIH tk:et 26/90/60 q LBS j8HY NOIN 000 000 000 00:0 |ShZ cB8O 982 POL 00:0 0 {&%F € b< MEZ610220 LO60Z91 1b SIH Otel 26/90/60 e Leis j84 NOIN ueaW wnwixey wnwiulyy ealy jueay ebuey wnuwixey wnuwiuly | iajaweig junoD] apo, wnwixeyy wnwiuly ealy jeu SSauyoys jeayey pebpag uonenauag erawed s}sejopnyw Jolew (ud) azig ujesD jeuojssaoons SGNLIONO1 SONLLV1 LSATIVNV SWIL ayeq | ‘day uojers jpunow é}| O4}81 “aqny ws gbe) jays “qay Ayoyed ‘uaBAxo mo] Ajjeied juaique Ayoyedqurey Gd ‘yewaqny dwiy dn-paddu ‘6e] jeys!juaiquie eosijedwiy oseds ‘nods pns!pues you-|jeys ‘juaquie || 04}8 ‘Syew aqn) dn-paddu ‘6e] jjeys 's uaique yew eqn) eosijadwy dn-paddu ‘be, |jays ‘juaique jure} dy ‘Beynoosym pues you-|jays ‘6e] jays uaique éyew eqn) eosiedwy '{6uueaws sedi ‘yuaique SpIOA Builped} ‘yew eqn) eosijadwiy dn-paddu ‘jueique yew! eqn) dn-paddu ‘uidap ye pion Bulpasy ‘syoejpe sadim ‘Z)uaique sagn) uns ws ‘He| j}eys ‘yw/Sjuaiqwe ‘ued moyjeys yew eqn) ‘pues you-|jays ‘juaique yew aqn) eosijedwy dn-paddu‘pns ye 61; pue Ge jjays ‘juaique éSPIOA Buipae; Tsodep Bulpaay/moung juaique UNS UO JSejOpNw 'W/S uaiquie pion Buipaaytunoos pins ‘6e| |jays soul! yy/S‘juaiquie Wg Je WOM ‘syewagn) podiydwe ‘jwyq/pues 4g ‘juaique E[100Y'soqny eoesijaduy ‘sjoejiye sadim ‘uaiquie 4JNOOS Ns JOUIW ‘(~spodiydwe Anf)saqn) ns ws!yy/sjuaique él] O18 “nods pins ‘Ayoyed Qdy ‘juaique MOO ‘gjuaseid spodiydwiy !sjoeje sadim ‘juaique yew eqn) podiydwe dn-paddugaqny sniajdojyaeyy ‘w/S{juaique He) |}eys JouIW ‘uo saqny podiydwe ‘umop-Besp ‘wyq/pues 4g yuaique I] ONOY ‘yew eqn) eosijaduuiy dn-paddu ‘unoos pns ‘yuaique ENONOY !(jwUUad< -WW9g)WIOM By ‘yWy/S‘juaiquie Ns uO Saqn) podiydwy !wuoM/M PIOA Hulpagy ‘pues 4q ‘juaiquie él] O8Y ‘yNs uo syew aqn) podiydwe dn-paddu ‘juaique yidep wo 72 Wiom!({spodiydwe)seqn) ns ws‘,sjoRjipe sedim-qdqy pajjow ‘juaique ON ON ON ON ON ON ON ON ON ON ON ON ON ON ON ON ON ON ON ON ON ON ON WOISAHd WOISAHd WOISAHd WOISAHd WOISAHd WOISAHd WOISAHd WOISAHd WOISAHd WOISAHd WOISAHd AWOISAHd ooooocooocoe0ce°o ooooo0oo0oo0o0c0o°o0°o0°0o ooooo0ooooo0o00°o WOISAHd 0 8 0 0 WOISAHd 0 8 0 0 WOISAHd 0 6 0 0 LAGNI 0 S sos WOISAHd 0 Z 0 0 WOISAHd 0 Z 0 0 WOISAHd ) Z 0 0 WOISAHd 0 v 0 0 WOISAHd 0 Z 0 0 LAGNI 0 9 81'S ele WOISAHd 0 VN 0 0 WOISAHd 0 Z 0 0 OSINADOI8 0 8 te} 0 WOISAHd 0 S 0 0 LAOGNI 0 9 0 0 élBuoIsola ‘smuajoOVaeYyD 'W/S juaique (éspodiydwe ‘an!)yins uo saqn) ws ‘W/S!juaique spodiyduwe |iuaAn{ jo yew aqny'ws ‘juaique épa|ddu'spion Buipasy ws ‘yewaqn) ,eosijeduiy ‘pues iq ‘juaique yewaqn) eosijadwy dn-peddi ‘|) o1ay ‘Suns uo ssei6 jaa ‘pues 4g ‘juaique éll ONaY ‘apejq ssei6 jaa peap ‘juaique aqn) pins ws ‘Be; jays ‘uadsapun ‘}juaique él| O4Jay ‘ued MojjeUs ‘UaIque “‘punog QdH Mo|aq WOM Ul) ‘yeWeqn) podiyduy An[‘joeje sadim:;/S ‘juaiqwe JoeRje sedim ‘Zumop-Beip/mouing ‘yew aqn) dn-paddu ‘jays ejnpidei5 ‘juaiquwe pion Bulpaas‘wuom'pjalj-se) sruajdojaeyg'seqn) ws gunoos pns‘y/s!juaique pas ul sape|q sses6 jaa peap ‘uad