Series title. Author title, Title for subject entry. LIBRARY CATALOGUE SLIPS. United States. Department of the interior. (U.S. geological survey.) Department of the interior | — | Monographs | of the | United States geological survey | Volume XVIII | [Seal of the depart- ment] | Washington | government printing office | 1891 Second title: United States geological survey | J. W. Powell, director | — | Gasteropoda and cephalopoda | of the | Raritan ' clays and greensand marls | of New Jersey | by | Robert, Parr Whitfield | [Vignette] | Washington | government printing office | 1591 4°, 402 pp. 50 pl. Whitfield (Robert Parr). United States geological survey | J. W. Powell, director | — | Gasteropoda and cepbalopoda | of the | Raritan clays and green- j sand marls | of New Jersey | by | Robert Parr Whitfield | | [Vignette] | L Washington | government printing office | 1591 4°, 402 pp. 50 pl. (Unirep Staves. Department of the interior. (U. 8. geological survey). Monograph XVIII.) United States geological survey | J. W. Powell, director | — | Gasteropoda and cephalopoda | of the | Raritan clays and green- sand marls | of New Jersey | by | Robert Parr Whitfield | [Vignette] | Washington | government printing office | 1891 4°, 402 pp. 50 pl. (Unirep States. Department of the interior. (U.S. geological survey.) Monograph XVIII.] ADVERTISEMENT. [Monograph XVIII. ] The publications of the United States Geological Survey are issued in accordance with the statute approved Mareh 3, 1879, which declares that— “The publications of the Geological Survey shall consist of the annual report of operations, geo- logical and economic maps illustrating the resources and classification of the lands, and reports upon general and economie geology and paleontology. The annual report of operations of the Geological Survey shall accompany the annual report of the Secretary of the Interior. All special memoirs and reports of said Survey shall be issued in uniform quarto series if deemed necessary by the Director, but otherwise in ordinary octavos. Three thousand copies of each shall be published for scientific exchanges and for sale at the price of publication; and all literary and cartographic materials received in exchange shall be the property of the United States and form a part of the library of the organization: And the money resulting from the sale of such publications shall be covered into the Treasury of the United States.” The following joint resolution, referring to all government publications, was passed by Congress July 7, 1882: “That whenever any document or report shall be ordered printed by Congress, there shall be printed, in addition to the number in each case stated, the ‘usual number’ (1,900) of copies for binding and distribution among those entitled to receive them.” Except in those cases in which an extra number of any publication has been supplied to the Sur- vey by special resolution of Congress or has been ordered by the Secretary of the Interior, this office has no copies for gratuitous distribution. ANNUAL REPORTS. I. First Annual Report of the United States Geological Survey, by Clarence King. 1880. 8°. 79 pp. 1 map.—A preliminary report describing plan of organization and publications. II. Second Annual Report of the United States Geological Survey, 1880-81, by J. W. Powell. 1882. &°. lv, 588 pp. 62 pl. 1 map. III. Third Annual Report of the United States Geological Survey, 158182, by J. W. Powell. 1883. 8°. xviii, 564 pp. 67 pl. and maps. IV. Fourth Annual Report of the United States Geological Survey, 1882-83, by J. W. Powell. 1884. 8°. xxxii, 473 pp. 85 pl. and maps. V. Fitth Annual Report of the United States Geological Survey, 1883-84, by J. W. Powell. 1885. 8°. xxxvi, 469 pp. 58 pl. and’ maps. VI. Sixth Annual Report of the United States Geological Survey, 188485, by J. W. Powell. 1885. 8°. xxix, 570 pp. 65 pl. and maps. VH. Seventh Annual Report of the United States Geological Survey, 188586, by J. W. Powell. 1888. 8°. xx, 656 pp. 71 pl. and maps. VIII. Eighth Annual Report of the United States Geological Survey, 1586~87, by J. W. Powell. 1859, 8°, 2v. xix, 474, xii pp. 53 pl. and maps; 1p. 1. 475-1063 pp. 54-76 pl. and maps. IX. Ninth Annual Report of the United States Geological Survey, 188788, by J. W. Powell. 1889. 8°. xiii, 717 pp. 88 pl. and maps. X. Tenth Annual Report of the United States Geological Survey, 1888-’89, by J. W. Powell. 1890. 8°. 2v. xv,774 pp. 98 pl. and maps; viii, 123 pp. XI. Eleventh ‘Annual Report of the United States Geological Survey, 1889-’90, by J. W. Powell. 1801. 8°. 2v. xv, 757 pp. 66 pl. and maps; ix, 351 pp. 30 pl. and maps. XII. Twelfth Annual Report of the United States Geological Survey, 1890-91, by J. W. Powell. 1891. 8° 2y. xiii,675 pp. 53 pl. and maps; xviii,576 pp. 146 pl. and maps. MONOGRAPHS. I. Lake Bonneville, by Grove Karl Gilbert. 1890. 4°, xx, 438 pp. 51 pl. lmap. Price $1.50. Il. Tertiary History of the Grand Canon District, with atlas, by Clarence E. Dutton, Capt., U. S.A. 1882. 4°. xiv, 264 pp. 42 pl.and atlas of 24 sheets folio, Price $10.00. III. Geology of the Comstock Lode and the Washoe District, with atlas, by George F. Becker. 1882. 4°. xv, 422 pp. 7 pl. and atlas of 21 sheets folio. Price $11.00. IV. Comstock Mining and Miners, by Eliot Lord. 1883. 4°. xiv, 451 pp. 3 pl. Price $1.50 £ I II ADVERTISEMENT. V. The Copper-Bearing Rocks of Lake Superior, by Roland Duer Irving. 1883. 4°. xvi, 464 pp. 15]. 29pl.and maps. Price $1.85. VI. Contributions to the Knowledge of the Older Mesozoic Flora of Virginia, by William Morris Fontaine. 1883. 4°. xi, 144 pp. 541. 54 pl. Price $1.05. VII. Silver-Lead Deposits of Eureka, Nevada, by Joseph Story Curtis. 1884. 4°. xiii, 200 pp. 16 pl. Price $1.20. VIII. Paleontology of the Eureka District, by Charles Doolittle Waleott. 1884. 49°. xiii, 298 pp. 241, 24pl. Price $1.10. IX. Brachiopoda and Lamellibranchiata of the Raritan Clays and Greensand Marls of New Jersey, by Robert P. Whitfield. 1885. 4°. xx, 338 pp. 35pl. lmap. Price $1.15. X. Dinocerata. A Monograph of an Extinct Order of Gigantic Mammals, by Othniel Charles Marsh. 1886. 4°. xviii, 243 pp. 561. 56 pl]. Price $2.70. XI. Geological History of Lake Lahontan, a Quaternary Lake of Northwestern Nevada, by Israel Cook Russell. 1585. 4°. xiv,288pp. 46 pl. and maps. Price $1.75. XII. Geology and Mining Industry of Leadville, Colorado, with atlas, by Samuel Franklin Em- mons. 1886. 4°. xxix,770 pp. 45 pl. and atlas of 35 sheets folio. Price $8.40. XIII. Geology of the Quicksilver Deposits of the Pacifie Slope, with atlas, by George F. Becker. 1888. 4°, xix, 486 pp. 7 pl. and atlas of 14 sheets folio. Price $2.00. XIV. Fossil Fishes and Fossil Plants of the Triassic Rocks of New Jersey and the Connecticut Valley, by John 8. Newberry. 1888. 4°. xiv, 152 pp. 26 pl. Price $1.00. XV. The Potomac or Younger Mesozoic Flora, by William Morris Fontaine, 1889, 4°, xiv, 377 pp. 180 pl. Text and plates bound separately. Price $2.50. XVI. The Paleozoic Fishes of North America, by John Strong Newberry. 1889. 4°. 340 pp. 53 pl. Price $1.00. XVII. The Flora of the Dakota Group, a posthumous work, by Leo Lesquereux. Edited by F. H. Knowlton. 1891. 4°. 400 pp. 6€ pl. Price $1.10. XVIII. Gasteropoda and Cephalopeda of the Raritan Clays and Greensand Marls of New Jersey, by Robert P. Whitfield. 1891. 4°. 402 pp. 50 pl. Price $1.00. In press: XIX. The Penokee Iron-Bearing Series of Northern Wisconsin and Michigan, by Roland D, Irving and C. R. Van Hise. XX. Geology of the Eureka District, Nevada, by Arnold Hague. XXI, The Tertiary Rhynchophorous Coleoptera of North America, by 8. H. Sendder. XXII. Geology of the Green Mountains in Massachusetts, by Messrs. Pumpelly, Wolff, and Dale. In preparation : —Mollusea and Crustacea of the Miocene Formations of New Jersey, by R. P. Whitfield. —Sauropoda, by O. C. Marsh. —Stegosauria, by O. C. Marsh. —Brontotheridx, by O. C. Marsh. —Report on the Denver Coal Basin, by S$. F. Emmons. —Report on Silver Cliff and Ten-Mile Mining Districts, Colorado, by 8. F. Emmons. —The Glacial Lake Agassiz, by Warren Upham. BULLETINS. 1. On Hypersthene-Andesite and on Triclinie Pyroxene in Augitic Rocks, by Whitman Cross, with a Geological Sketch of Buffalo Peaks, Colorado, by 8. F. Emmons. 1883, 8°. 42 pp. 2 pl. Price 10 cents. 2. Gold and Silver Conversion Tables, giving the coining values of troy ounces of fine metal, ete., computed by Albert Williams, jr. 1883. 8°. 8 pp. Price 5 cents. ; 3. On the Fossil Faunas of the Upper Devonian, along the meridian of 76° 30/, from Tompkins County, N. Y., to Bradford County, Pa., by Henry 8. Williams. 1884. 8°. 36 pp. Price 5 cents. 4. On Mesozoic Fossils, by Charles A. White. 1884. 8°. 36 pp. 9 pl. Price 5 cents. 5. A Dictionary of Altitudes in the United States, compiled by Henry Gannett. 1884, 8°. 325 pp. Price 20 cents. 6. Elevations in the Dominion of Canada, by J. W. Spencer. 1884. 8°. 43 pp. Price 5 cents. 7. Mapoteca Geologica Americana. A Catalogue of Geological Maps of America (North and South), 1752-1881, in geographic and chronologic order, by Jules Marcou and John Belknap Marcon. 1884. 8°. 184 pp. Price 10 cents. 8. On Secondary Enlargements of Mineral Fragments in Certain Rocks, by R. D. Irving and C.R. Van Hise. 1884. 8°. 56 pp. 6pl. Price 10 cents. 9. A Report of work done in the Washington Laboratory during the fiscal year 1883~84. F. W. Clarke, chief chemist; T. M. Chatard, assistant chemist. 1884. 8°. 40 pp. Price 5 cents. 10. On the Cambrian Faunas of North America. Preliminary studies, by Charles Doolittle Wal- cott. 1884. 8°. 74 pp. 10pi. Price 5 cents. 11. On the Quaternary and Recent Mollusca of the Great Basin; with Descriptions of New Forms, by R. Ellsworth Call. Introduced by a sketch of the Quaternary Lakes of the Great Basin, by G. K. Gilbert. 1884. 8°. 66 pp. 6pl. Price 5 cents. ADVERTISEMENT. iit 12. A Crystallographic Study of the Thinolite of Lake Lahontan, by Edward 8. Dana. 1884. 8°. 34 pp. 3pl. Price 5 cents. 13. Boundaries of the United States and of the several States and Territories, with a Historical Sketch of the Territorial Changes, by Henry Gannett. 1885. 8°. 135 pp. Price 10 cents. 14. The Electrical and Magnetic Properties of the Iron-Carburets, by Carl Barus and Vincent Strouhal. 1885. 8°. 238 pp. Price 15 cents. 15. On the Mesozoic and Cenozoic Paleontology of California, by Charles A. White. 1885, 5°. 33 pp. Price 5 cents. 16. On the Higher Devonian Faunas of Ontario County, New York, by John M. Clarke. 1885. 89°. 86 pp. 3pl. Price 5 cents. 17. On the Development of Crystallization in the Igneous Rocks of Washoe, Nevada, with Notes on the Geology of the District, by Arnold Hague and Joseph P. Iddings. 1k85. 8°. 44 pp. Price 5 cents. 18. On Marine Eocene, Fresh-water Miocene, and other Fossil Mollusca of Western North America, by Charles A. White, 1585, 5°. 26 pp. 3pl. Price 5 cents. 19. Notes on the Stratigraphy of California, by George F, Becker. 1880. 8°. 28pp. Price 5 cents. 20. Contributions to the Mineralogy of the Rocky Mountains, by Whitman Cross and W. I. Hille- brand. 1885. 8° l1l4pp. 1pl. Price 10 cents. 21. The Lignites of the Great Sioux Reservation. A Report on the Region between the Grand and Moreau Rivers, Dakota, by Bailey Willis. 188). 8°. 16 pp. Spl. Price 5 cents. 99, On New Cretaceous Fossils from California, by Charles A. White. 1885, 8°. 25 pp. 5 pl. Price 5 cents. 23. Observations on the Junction between the Eastern Sandstone and the Keweenaw Series on Keweenaw Point, Lake Superior, by R. D. Irving ane T. C. Chamberlin. 1885. 8°. 124 pp. 17 pl. Price 15 cents. 24. List of Marine Mollusea, comprising the Quaternary fossils and recent forms from American Localities between Cape Hatteras and Cape Roque, including the Bermudas, by William Healey Dall. 1885. 8°. 336 pp. Price 25 cents. 25. The Present Technical Condition of the Steel Industry of the United States, by Phineas Barnes. 1885. 8°. 85 pp. Price 10 cents. 26. Copper Smelting, by Henry M. Howe. 1885. 8°. 107 pp. Price 10 cents. 27. Report of work done in the Division of Chemistry and Physics, mainly during the fiseal year 188485. 18:6. 8°. 80 pp. Price 10 cents. 28. The Gabbros and Associated Hornblende Rocks oceurring in the Neighborhood of Baltimore, Md., by George Huntington Williams. 1886. 8°. 78pp. 4 pl. Price 10 cents. 29, On the Fresh-water Invertebrates of the North American Jurassic, by Charles A. White. 1886. 8°. 4ipp. 4 pl. Price 5 cents. 30, Second Contribution to the Studies on the Cambrian Faunas of North America, by Charles Doolittle Walcott. 1886. 8°. 369 pp. 33 pl. Price 25 cents. 31. Systematic Review of our Present Knowledge of Fossil Insects, including Myriapods and Arachnids, by Samuel Hubbard Scudder. 1886. 8°. 128 pp. Price 15 cents. 39, Lists and Analyses of the Mineral Springs of the United States; a Preliminary Study, by Albert C. Peale. 1886. 8°. 285 pp. Price 20 cents. 33. Notes on the Geology of Northern California, by J.S. Diller. 1886. 8°. 23 pp. Price5 cents. 34. On the relation of the Laramie Molluscan Fauna to that of the sneceeding Fresh-water Eocene and other groups, by Charles A. White. 1886. 8°. 54pp. 5pl. Price 10 cents. 35. Physical Properties of the Iron-Carburets, by Carl Barus and Vincent Strouhal. 1886. 8°. 62 pp. Price 10 cents. 36. Subsidence of Fine Solid Particles in Liquids, by Carl Barus. 1886. 8°. 58pp. Price 10 cents. 37. Types of the Laramie Flora, by Lester F. Ward. 1887. 8°. 354 pp. 57 pl. Price 25 cents. 38. Peridotite of Elliott County, Kentucky, by JS. Diller. 1887. 8°. 3lpp. Lpl. Price 5 cents. 39. The Upper Beaches and Deltas of the Glacial Lake Agassiz, by Warren Upham. 1857. 8°. 84 pp. Lpl. Price 10 cents. 40, Changes in River Courses in Washington Territory due to Glaciation, by Bailey Willis. 1887. 8°, 10 pp. 4pl._ Price 5 cents. 41. On the Fossil Faunas of the Upper Devonian—the Genesee Section, New York, by Henry 8. Williams. 1887. 8°. 121lpp. 4 pl. Price 15 cents. 42. Report of work done in the Division of Chemistry and Physics, mainly during the fiseal year 188586. F. W. Clarke, chief chemist. 1887. 8°. 152 pp. pl. Price 15 cents. 43. ‘Tertiary and Cretaceous Strata of the Tuscaloosa, Tombigbee, and Alabama Rivers, by Eugene A. Smith and Lawrence C. Johnson. 1887. 5°. 189 pp. 21 pl. Price 15 cents. ’ 44, Bibliography of North American Geology for 1886, by Nelson H. Darton. 1887. 8°. 35 pp. Price 5 cents. :* ; 45. The Present Condition of Knowledge of the Geology of Texas, by Robert ‘T. Hill. 1887. 8°. 94 pp. Price 10 cents. 46, Nature and Origin of Deposits of Phosphate of Lime, by R. A. F. Penrose, jr., with an Intro- duction by N.S. Shaler. 1888. 5°. 143 pp. Price 15 cents. 47. Analyses of Waters of the Yellowstone National Park, with an Account of the Methods of Analysis employed, by Frank Austin Gooch and James Edward Whitfield. 1888. 8°. 84 pp. Price 10 cents. 48. On the Form and Position of the Sea Level, by Robert Simpson Woodward, 158. 8°. 88 pp. Price 10 cents. IV ADVERTISEMENT. 49. Latitudes and Longitudes of Certain Points in Missouri, Kansas, and New Mexico, by Robert Simpson Woodward. 1889. 8°. 133 pp. Price 15 cents. 50. Formulas and Tables to facilitate the Construction and Use of Maps, by Robert Simpson Woodward. 1889. 8°. 124 pp. Price 15 cents. 51. On Invertebrate Fossils from the Pacific Coast, by Charles Abiathar White. 1889. 8°. 102 pp. 14pl. Price 15 cents. 52. Subaérial Decay of Rocks and Origin of the Red Color of Certain Formations, by Israel Cook Russell. 1889. 8°. 65 pp. 5pl. Price 10 cents. 53. The Geology of Nantucket, by Nathaniel Southgate Shaler. 1889. 8°. 55pp. 10pl. Price 10 cents. 54. On the Thermo-Electric Measurement of High Temperatures, by Carl Barus. 1889. 8°. 313 pp. incl. 1 pl. 11 pl. Price 25 cents. 55. Report of work done in the Division of Chemistry and Physies, mainly during the fiseal year 188687. Frank Wigglesworth Clarke, chief chemist. 1889. 8°. 96 pp. Price 10 cents. 56. Fossil Wood and Lignite of the Potomac Formation, by Frank Hall Knowlton. 1889. 8°. 72 pp. 7pl. Price 10 cents. a7. A Geological Reconnaissance in Southwestern Kansas, by Robert Hay. 1890. 8°. 49 pp. 2pl. Price 5 cents. 58. The Glacial Boundary in Western Pennsylvania, Ohio, Kentucky, Indiana, and Illinois, by George Frederick Wright, with an introduction by Thomas Chrowder Chamberlin. 1890, 8°. 112 pp. inel. Ll pl. 8pl. Price 15 cents. 59. The Gabbros and Associated Rocks in Delaware, by Frederick D. Chester. 1890. 8°. 45 pp. 1pl. Price 10 cents. 60. Report of work done in the Division of Chemistry and Physics, mainly during the fiseal year 1887—’88. F. W. Clarke, chief chemist. 1890. 8°. 174 pp. Price 15 cents. 61. Contributions to the Mineralogy of the Pacific Coast, by William Harlow Melville and Wal- demar Lindgren. 1890. 8°. 40 pp. 3 pl. Price 5 cents. 62. The Greenstone Schist Areas of the Menominee and Marquette Regions of Michigan, a contri- bution to the subject of dynamic metamorphism in ernptive rocks, by George Huntington Williams, with an introduction by Roland Duer Irving. 1590. 8°. 241 pp. 16 pl. Price 30 cents. 63. A Bibliography of Paleozoic Crustacea from 1698 to 1889, including a list of North Amer- ican species and a systematic arrangement of genera, by Anthony W. Vogdes. 1890. 8°. 177 pp. Price 15 cents. 64. A Report of work done in the Division of Chemistry and Physics, mainly during the fiseal year 1888-89. F, W. Clarke, chief chemist. 1590. 8°. 60 pp. Price 10 cents. 65. Stratigraphy of the Bituminous Coal Field of Pennsylvania, Ohio, and West Virginia, by Israel C. White. 1891. 8°. 212pp. i1lpl. Price 20 cents. 66. On a Group of Voleanie Rocks from the Tewan Mountains, New Mexico, and on the occurrence of Primary Quartz in certain Basalts, by Joseph Paxson Iddings. 1890. 8°. 34 pp. Price 5 cents. 67. The relations of the Traps of the Newark System in the New Jersey Region, by Nelson Horatio Darton. 1°90. 8°. 82 pp. Price 10 cents. 68. Earthquakes in California in 1889, by James Edward Keeler. 1890. 8°. 25 pp. Price5 cents. 69. A Classed and Annotated Bibliography of Fossil Insects, by Samue! Hubbard Sendder. 1890. 8°. 101 pp. Price 15 cents. 70. Report on Astronomical Work of 1889 and 1590, by Robert Simpson Woodward, 1890. 8°. 79 pp. Price 10 cents. 71. Index to the Kuown Fossil Insects of the World, including Myriapods and Arachnids, by Samnel Hubbard Seudder. 1891. 8°. 744 pp. Price 50 cents. 72. Altitudes between Lake Superior and the Rocky Mountains, by Warren Upham. 1891. 8°, 229 pp. Price 20 cents. 73. The Viscosity of Solids, by Carl Barus. 1891. 8°. xii, 139 pp. 6 pl. Price 15 cents. 74. The Minerals of North Carolina, by Frederick Augustus Genth. 1891. 8°. 119 pp. Price 15 cents. 75. Record of North American Geology for 15887 to 1859, inelusive, by Nelson Horatio Darton. 1891. 8°. 173 pp. Price 15 cents. 76. A Dictionary of Altitudes in the United States (second edition), compiled by Henry Gannett, chief topographer. 1891. 8°. 393 pp. Price 25 cents. 77. The Texan Permian and its Mesozoic types of Fossils, by Charles A. White. 1891. 8°. 51 pp- 4 pl. Price 10 cents. 78. Areport of work done in the Division of Chemistry and Physics, mainly during the fiscal year 1889-90. EF. W. Clarke, chief chemist. 1891. 8°. 131 pp. Price 15 cents. 79. A Late Voleanic Eruption in Northern California and its peculiar lava, by J. 8. Diller. 80. Correlation papers—Devonian and Carboniferous, “by Henry Shaler Williams. 1891. 8°. 279 pp. Price 20 cents. 81. Correlation papers—Cambrian, by Charles Doolittle Walcott. 1691. 8°. 447 pp. 3 pl. Price 25 cents. 82. Correlation papers—Cretaceous, by Charles A. White. 1891. 8°. 273 pp. 3 pl. Price 20 cents. 83. Correlation papers—Kocene, by William Bullock Clark. 1891. 8°. 173 pp. 2pl. Price 15 cents. 91. Record of North American Geology for 1890, by Nelson Horatio Darton. 1891. 8°. 8&8 pp. Price 10 cents. ADVERTISEMENT. v In press: 84. Correlation papers—Neocene, by W. H. Dall and G. D. Harris. 85. Correlation papers—The Newark System, by I. C. Russell. 86. Correlation papers—Algonkian and Archean, by C. R. Van Hise. 90. A report of work done in the Division of Chemistry and Physies, mainly during the fiscal year 1890-91. F. W. Clarke, chief chemist. 92. The Compressibility of Liquids, by Carl Barus. 93. Some Insects of special interest from Florissant, Colorado, by S. H. Seudder. 94. The Mechanism of Solid Viscosity, by Carl Barus. 95, Earthquakes in California during 1890/91, by E. 8. Holden. 96. The Voiume Thermodynamics of Liquids, by Carl Barus. 97. The Mesozoic Echinodermata of the United States, by W. B. Clark. 98. Flora of the Outlying Coal Basios of Southwestern Missouri, by David White. 99. Record of North American Geology for 1891, by Nelson Horatio Darton. Tn preparation : — Correlation papers—Pleistocene, by T. C. Chamberlin. 100. Bibliography and Index of the publications of the U. 8. Geological Survey, 1879-1592, by P. C. Warman. 101. Insect fauna of the Rhode Island Coal-field, by Samuel Hubbard Sendder. — The Eruptive and Sedimentary Rocks on Pigeon Point, Minnesota, and their contact phe- nomena, by W. S. Bayley. — The Moraines of the Missouri Coteau and their attendant deposits, by James Edward Todd. — A Bibliography of Paleobotany, by David White. STATISTICAL PAPERS. Mineral Resources of the United States [1882], by Albert Williams, jr. 1883. 8°. xvii, 813 pp. Price 50 cents. Mineral Resources of the United States, 1883 aud 1884, by Albert Williams, jr. 1885. 5°. Xiv, 1016 pp. Price 60 cents. Mineral Resources of the United States, 1885. Division of Mining Statistics and Technology. 1886. 8°. vii, 576 pp. Price 40 cents. . Mineral Resources of the United States, 1886, by David T. Day. 1887. 8°. viii, 813 pp. Price 50 cents. Mineral Resources of the United States, 1887, by David T. Day. 1888. 8°. vii, 882 pp. Price 50 cents. Mineral Resources of the United States, 1888, by David T. Day. 1890. 8°. vii, 652 pp. Price 50 cents. The money received from the sale of these publications is deposited in the Treasury, and the Secretary of that Department declines to receive bank checks, drafts, or postage-stamps ; all remit- tances, therefore, must be by POSTAL NOTE or MONEY ORDER, made payable to the Librarian of the U. S. Geological Survey, or in CURRENCY for the exact amount. Correspondence relating to the pub- lications of the Survey should be addressed To THE DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, WASHINGTON, D. C, WASHINGTON, D. C., April, 1892. pee aes yy > Xo DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MONOGRAPHS UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Veo Ew NEE 2eeV 1 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1892 , ay . - A e ; » s x _ = , 7 ar™ ea - ¥ ¥ \ : 7 : : 5 , a are : a ) ee x. =e he gulk , Me er ; : bas = oat 2 = a s >» . ] : K . ‘ ° = : ‘ * é ‘ UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY J. W. POWELL, DIRECTOR GASTEROPODA AND CEPHALOPODA RARITAN CLAYS AND GREENSAND MARLS NEW JR Ss Bry, ROB DET BARR: WELTER LL) WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1892 , A . ; 4 . ; oe rss = - . uy rs. te ~~ al a : : a | aly Cd ed : =. CONTENTS. enteror transmittal trom) trol. Geo. es COOK. < sss oa.) von see co sloeme sac ces cneescieses =-=eao= Hettenoltransnintia. trom Prot. i.e b) WHtHCd 25-2. --c san scans osama lean ceeiee se onieeeee Preliminary remarks..-.-...---- F885 CORES aN gO 0 OCA OCCU SSE Ele SRS O CORR OR Anne SOO RCsS Ganteropod ad ecece ne coe s ete oe ae mee ae nae aac eet at acts wun comecviceac sabicns cen erccess cose tees Section I. Gasteropoda of the Lower Marl Beds........--...-..-- ---- 2-2-0 -02205 se00 cone LnGasreropoas ol phe, Middleman Hed: coosc---s Cocssiccealeea nn seced ccseyecss III. Gasteropoda of the base of the Upper Marl Bed. ..-..-. ...-...----..----------- DY aGasteropods) Obs tie MOCENGMMALIA = sosae sectowiece = ose aes enolate eee = (CGO EG) Ni Pie ee Segara Ga) SACROC CORE COS Se cS Se SSOe Seca bc meee semen = Segoe eee neon Section V. Cephalopoda of the Cretaceous Marls. ...-......----. ---- Rnb Saeeemacee ccs VI. Cephalopoda of the Eocene Marls ...-.-...----.----- fees Cease oee cratore oc Classified lists of the Mollusca of the Cretaceous and Eocene formations.--.......-.--.-.------ LEO De s8he ise Gaohace oS OCHS sce aces S Stet 20 Poa skaadeinecs ose senaonceene asnostossons PU Gk eae etecen a se ate a ante sae ate atnla = cineren ets oa ancae wicca teeuce secs paeeeese acossnes cece 0 . a eee a ay -* i . & bobUST RATIONS: Page. PLATE I. Muricids of the Lower Bed Greensand Marls..........-........-----.----. 300 II. Muricidze of the Lower Bed Greensand Marls-..-.......---.....---.-------- 302 III. Muricidx of the Lower Bed Greensand Marls-.-.-......-..---..-.....------ 304 IV. Muricidxw of the Lower Bed Greensand Marls.....................-----..-- 306 V. Muricide and Fasciolariidw of the Lower Greensand Marls .........--.-.-- 308 VI. Fuside and Fasciolariidx of the Lower Greensand Marls. ...-.....-...----- 310 VII. Fasciolariide of the Lower Greensand Marls...............-.2...----.-0--- 312 VIII. Fasciolariidw of the Lower Greensand Marls..............--......------.- 314 IX. Fasciolariidw, Tritonide and Turbinellide of the Lower Greensand Marls.. 316 X. Volutids of the Lower Greensand Marls...-....---...-... 2.22222. -c000-- 318 XI. Volutid# and Mitridw of the Lower Greensand Marls ...............-..-. .- 320 XII. Cancellariidz of the Lower Greensand Marls...............-...-.-.---..--- 322 XIII. Pleurotomid and Strombidw of the Lower Greensand Marls......._-.._..- 324 XIV. Strombidx of the Lower Greensand Marls ...-.........-.----.------ .e---.- 326 XV. Cypridx, Doliidw, and Naticidxw of the Lower Greensand Marls ...... _..- 328 XVI. Naticidx of the Lower Greensand Marls ....-.....-...---. sexe Seca. wee, = 330 XVII. Trochidx, Onustidie and Littorinidwe of the Lower Greensand Marls.. ...__. 332 XVIII. Scalariide, Turritellidw, and Vermetid of the Lower Greensand Marls.--- 334 XIX. Eulimide, Pyramidellidw, Patellide, and Tornatellid:e of the Lower Green- SALOMATIN Soom eet ee See ae eats ass 5 en cai aa aens we cores oe 336 XX. Tornatellidw, Cylichnidw, Bullidw, and Dentaliid:e of the Lower Greensand iM UTP) 26 es ae OI CROC GS IRR SED ree e ie = eee ae 338 XXI. Muricieéx, Volutidw, and Naticidm of the Middle Bed Greensand Marls .-... 340 XXII. Sealariidx and Pleurotomariid of the Middle Bed Greensand Marls..-.---. -- 342 XXIII. Turbinellidw, Volutidswe, Plearotomide, Strombide, Turritellidee, Plenroto- mariid, and Bullidw from the base of the Upper Bed Greensand Marls. 344 XXIV. Muricide, Tritonide, Purpuride, and Fuside of the Eocene layers of the Wpper Bed) Greensande Manse 22-32. o:cdenmamas sss ses sce eseeost sens 0 346 XXV. Fusidw of the Eocene layers, Upper Bed Greensand Marl3 .--...---. .--.---- 3438 XXVI. Fusidw and Fasciolariide of tle Eocene layers of the Upper Bed Greensand [NP ee I SIS So SAE Be Ga SS SM Ae a a 350 XXVII. Fasciolariide of the Eocene layers of the Upper Bed Greensand Marls ---. -- 352 XXVIII. Fasciolariide of the Eocene layers of the Upper Bed Greensand Marls.-.--. 354 XXIX. Turbinellidse of the Eocene layers of the Upper Bed Greensand Marls..----. 356 XXX. Volutida of the Eocene layers of the Upper Bed Greensand Marls......----- 358 . 7 8 ILLUSTRATIONS. XXXI. Volutidx of the Eocene layers of the Upper Bed Greensand Marls XXXII. Volutidsw of the Eocene layers of the Upper Bed Greensand Marls XXXIII. Cancellariide, Pleurotomidz, Strombidx, and Cypride of the Eocene lay- ers of the Upper Bed Greensand Marls XXXIV. Conid, Cassidide, Doliidw, Naticide, Onustide, Solariidw, Scalariide, and Turritellid of the Eocene layers of the Upper Bed Greensand Marls..-- XXXV. Pleurotomariidie of the Eocene layers of the Upper Bed Greensand Marls---- XXXVI. Pleurotomariid and Tornatellide of the Eocene layers of the Upper Bed Greensand (Mare yee ae re a i XXXVII. Nautilidx of the Lower Bed Greensand Marls.-.-.-...----..----..----------- XXXVIII. Nautilidze of the Lower and Middle Beds Greensand Marls.--- ..-.-.-----.-- XXXIX. Nautilide of the Middle Bed Greensand Marls. ..-.-.-..-----..-------------- XL. Ammonitidx of the Lower Bed Greensand Marls.-.---. ..---. .----. --------- XLI. Ammonitid of the Lower and Middle Beds Greensand Marls XLII. Ammonitid of the Lower Bed Greensand Marls........-.------- ---------- XLIII. Ammonitidz of the Lower Bed Greensand Marls.----.------.-------------- XLIV. Ammonitide of the Lower Bed Greensand Marls...--..-.---.--------.------- XLY. Ammonitidse of the Lower Bed Greensand Marls....-.....----..--..-------- XLVI. Ammonitid of the Lower and Middle Beds Greensand Marls XLVII. Belemnitidie of the Lower Bed Greensand Marls.-........----.---..--.----- XLVIII. Nautilide of the Eocene layers of the Upper Bec Greensand Marls..-.. .---- XLIX. Nautilidz of the Eocene layers of the Upper Bed Greensand Marls....---- - L. Nautilid of the Eocene layers of the Upper Bed Greensand Marls....----- Fig. 1. Placenticeras (Sphenodiscus) lenticulare (Owen) Meek ...--.-.------..--------------- DO Nantilus | Cookandec se oe o-. > ce celcnec omc sare ean aetna an alee eet ee eee eee Page. 360 362 364 366 368 370 372 374 376 378 380 382 384 386 388 390 392 394 396 398 259 236 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF New JERSEY, New Brunswick, New Jersey, July 1, 1889. Sir: I have the honor herewith to transmit to you the text and draw- ings of the Gasteropoda and Cephalopoda of the Raritan Clays and Green- sand Marls of New Jersey. They have been prepared by Prot. Robert P. Whitfield for the Geological Survey of this State, and include all species of this geological division which are known to have been found within its bounds. The book will constitute the second volume of the series, which is intended to include descriptions of all the fossil invertebrates found in the above named formations. It is a monument to the patience and intelli- gent skill of Prof. Whitfield which have produced so good a work from these long known but imperfectly preserved fossils. Like its predecessor, I esteem it worthy of a place among the monographs of the United States as well as of this State, and as such transmit it to you for publication. I am, with high respect, your obedient servant, Gero. H. Cook, State Geologist of New Jersey. Hon. J. W. Powe 1, Director of the U. S. Geological Survey. See 8 es YA ere pmo ns tae. | ' Ree” i, © o» BEE hPL RANS MITTAL, New York, October 1, 1888. Sir: I herewith transmit to you descriptions and illustrations of the Gasteropoda and Cephalopoda of the Greensand Marls and accompanying beds of New Jersey, which will form a second part of the report on the fossil remains of the State. In presenting this second report, I wish again to express my thanks for the aid which you have so often given me in the selection and exami- nation of material from the many collections under your charge; and also to express through you my thanks for the kindness and courtesy with which my many demands have been met by the officers of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and especially to thank their curator, Prof. Angelo Heilprin, who has kindly selected and sent me many specimens from the collection under his charge. I have also been greatly favored. by the use of specimens from the cabinet at the School of Mines of Columbia College in New York, through the kind offices of Dr. J. S. Newberry and Dr. N. L. Britton. I have also been allowed to use and figure very many specimens from the collection at the Ameri- can Museum of Natural History, New York City, for which I must express my thanks to the trustees of that institution. There are also several private collections to which I am indebted, through yourself, for the use of valu- able material and for which I here wish to express my thanks. Yours, very truly, R. P. Waitrievp. Prof. Grorce H. Cook, State Geologist of New Jersey. u ere - = ¥ - _ 4 a? 4 . ee a>" Ty i A a . ; gis 4 2 : a 7 ba - E 7 ' 2 > > ae ‘ > 4. stl oe i) : oo i _ a rl ° sii GASTEROPODA AND CEPHALOPODA OF THE RARITAN CLAYS AND GREENSAND MARLS OF NEW JERSEY. By Rospert P. WHITFIELD. PRELIMINARY REMARKS. In offering the following descriptions and illustrations of the Gaste- ropoda and Cephalopoda of the New Jersey marl beds to the public and to scientific workers in similar fields, it is perhaps only just to add a word of apology for the use of such meager material as is here presented, and that apology must necessarily be that it is all there is to present, being the best material possessed. In studying these remains I have had the same diffi- culties to encounter as those spoken of in the ‘‘preliminary remarks” to the volume on the Brachiopoda and Lamellibranchiata;’ but in an extremely exaggerated form, as the Gasteropods are represented in the several forma- tions only by casts, much more exclusively than are the Brachiopods and Lamellibranchs, and the Cephalopods largely by fragments. This, how- ever, is not the only difficulty encountered, for these casts are far more imperfect and consequently more difficult to understand. Among the bivalves there is often the chance of obtaining the hinge structure and muscular markings from impressions of single valves, and very commonly imprints of the exterior show all the essential surface markings. This is not the case, however, with casts of Gasteropods, for these usually repre- sent only a small portion of the shell, as the apical portion of the spire is almost invariably absent, that space not having been filled by sediment before the shell was dissolved, and when present having often become solid from deposits of shelly matter in these parts during the life of the animal. Mon. U. 8. Geol, Survey, Vol. 9, and Geol. Survey, N. J., Paleontology of the Cretaceous and Tertiary, Vol. 1, 13 14 PALEONTOLOGY OF NEW JERSEY. Besides the absence of these parts, which often present important generic features in the embryonic nucleus, there is an almost total absence of the anterior beak and front of all shells, which so generally possess important generic features. Occasionally the casts retain to some extent the surface markings of the species. This is particularly the case in the Eocene marls, but in the Cretaceous beds it is a rare feature; consequently it has been necessary to resort to various methods for determining the generic relations. For specific differences the student is compelled to rely chiefly upon the form of the volutions and upon the proportions of parts, such as the compact- ness of the coil; the differences in the apical angle; the size and strength of the axis of the shell or columella, which is ascertained from the size and form of the cavity left by its removal; the imprints of folds left upon that part of the matrix which has rested against the columella, and various other features according to the conditions of the specimens. In some cases where much doubt of generic relations has been felt, resort has been had to arti- ficial casts made by filling the interior of recent shells with plaster and dissolving away the shell by means of acid to procure the cast of the interior. I have thus used every means within my reach to render the generic determinations of these casts as reliable as possible. Concerning many of these I am somewhat in doubt, but as a general thing they may be relied upon with a considerable degree of certainty. In regard to the authenticity of localities assigned to the several species, the remarks made in the previous volume’ hold good here, as the same collections which furnished material for that volume have been drawn on as largely for the material in this. I have used the types of all previously described species wherever I could find them, even to fragments preserving the least particle of character. The species of Gasteropoda are much better represented by individuals in the collections used than were the Lamellibranchiates, although of many of them there is but a single example known in the collections to which I have had access. The illustrations of many of the species are necessarily quite restricted and meager in quantity. Many species have been recognized, but not used, simply because of the 1Tbid., p. xviii, PRELIMINARY REMARKS. 15 poorness of the material at hand, which, although sufficiently perfect to be readily distinguished by a practiced eye familiar with the associated forms, is not good enough to permit figures of them to be made which would enable others to identify them. Consequently this monograph can not be said to be entirely complete. In dealing with the different species and genera previously described, I have endeavored to ascertain their true nature as far as possible from the type specimens when they could be found, and have adopted them wherever it seemed reasonable. Comments on many of them will be found in the text of the volume, where I give my reasons for adopting or rejecting them. oo ees : ve OF ei ae iinet, dé tit hoe PY ee Sea ry 14 oe ge CAS THR ROPOD A. MON XVUI——2 SOE ON I. CRETACEOUS GASTEROPODA OF THE LOWER MARL BEDS OF NEW JERSEY. PALEONTOLOGICAL HORIZONS OF THE MARL BEDS. In working over the molluscan remains described and figured in this and the volume on the Lamellibranchiates, I find indications of several distinct zoological horizons. In the first place, in the Raritan Clays, in the northeastern extension of them, there appears an estuary fauna represented by only a few species of bivalve estuary shells, but nevertheless indicating very clearly a fauna entirely distinct from any of those above mentioned. Secondly, in the clay beds near Camden, New Jersey, at Fish House, an entirely fresh-water fauna is found, which has yielded the twelve different species representing two distinct genera of the Unionide, which are described in the volume on Brachiopoda and Lamellibranchiata of the Raritan Clays and Greensand Marls of New Jersey. Above this again we have the fauna of the Lower Marl beds, a distinctly marine fauna, which comprises the great bulk of all the fossil remains known within the State. This bed, if properly examined, might possibly be separable into two zoological horizons, the lower indicated at Crosswicks Creek, near New Egypt, and at Haddonfield, by the dark-colored micaceous clays which lie at the base or, more properly, below the base of the Lower Marl bed, and also in the more northern portions of the State by ironstone nodules, bear- ing fossils. usually found in the upper layers of the Raritan Clays and in loose pieces scattered over the surface where the upper layers of the clay have been denuded by the action of the weather. The fossils in these nodules are usually the same as those from the Crosswicks and Haddonfield 19 20 PALEONTOLOGY OF NEW JERSEY. micaceous beds, and, although several are apparently identical with forms occurring in the Lower Marls, yet many of them are peculiar to these beds as far as represented in New Jersey. Above the Lower Marls come the Middle Marl beds, characterized by the yellow lime sands, filled in many places with Terebratula, and above this the layers at the base of the Upper Green Marls, which contain a fauna entirely distinct from those below, but still Cretaceous in its character, Again, at the summit of the Upper Green Marls we find another distinct fauna, representing the Eocene epoch of the more southern States and affording many species identical with those from Claiborne, Alabama. These mark six distinct zoological horizons, and if we divide the Lower Marls from the Crosswicks and Haddonfield beds, as will possibly be done when they are properly examined and studied, seven distinct horizons, six of which may be classed as Cretaceous and one as Eocene. These zoological horizons conform very closely, if not exactly, to cer- tain stratigraphical lines which were long since established by the State geologist under the names of Raritan Clays, Camden Clays, Lower, Middle, and Upper Marls, the last bed being mollusk-bearing only near the lower and upper portions, which are respectively Cretaceous and Eocene. The details of these beds can be found in the different annual reports of the State survey, particularly in that of 1868, and in that on the clays of New Jersey. Although between these zoological horizons there is little, and, indeed almost no interchange of fossils, the faunas being almost entirely distinct, the geological sequence is continuous, except between the Eocene or Upper layers of the Upper Green Marls and the beds immediately below, where there is a very slight unconformity, noticeable by close inspection, over a very limited area only, and consisting principally of a slight denudation of the top of the beds immediately below, before the deposition of the Eocene Marls. It is not necessary here to consider in detail the structure of the layers further than to mention that these different beds which are fossiliferous, or mollusk bearing, consist at the base of the section of beds of clay of GASTEROPODA OF THE LOWER GREEN MARLS. 21 different kinds, and above of beds of Green Marls separated by strata of lighter colored quartz sand, which are unfossiliferous. In the Raritan Clays, at about one-third of their thickness from the base, there occurs a bed of fossil plants, prolific in genera and _ species, which Dr J. 5S. Newberry has stated to be of Cretaceous age, and at a very little distance. above the plant bed occur the estuary fossils above men- tioned. These consist of bivalve shells, and are all of forms known to in- habit brackish water, showing them to be inhabitants of an estuary or land- locked bay into which fresh-water streams flowed, and making it probable that there existed at the time of their deposit a body of brackish water rep- resenting the present New York Harbor, but at a somewhat higher level as compared with the surrounding land. These fossils being of estuary forms and entirely of new species do not aid us materially in the determination of the age of the strata in which they are found. Those already known are figured and deseribed in the previous volume, and are illustrated on Pl. u. They represent four different genera and five species, as follows: Species. GonusyA Rabe seca ce see eel e teen com cele cites wee micolenisicerinie'= ale amie naam ale ininin i= (—~ 1 Gonna GUrbiCul ae ses eaeee eee eoeia ae alae aie Seales eee aties saeco == 2 Genna GiathodOnecns ccs seer ae ete senile aclka care Dace aewcmn ease vas® omen nm 1 GentsyA Mm DONIGRTO 1a pense eter ee etek a aereeige aes Sa onal eee ale elsisinitot < mniciowe= 1 The features of this latter genus, which is new to science, are more nearly like some of the Jurassic forms of Europe, such as Homomya Ag., than any of the known Cretaceous types either of America or of Europe. No Gasteropods have yet been obtained from these beds. No other Molluscan remains are known to occur in these clays except near the top, or perhaps in the uppermost layers. At about this horizon the numerous ironstone nodules before mentioned are supposed to occur, but they are always loose, having been weathered out or washed from the clays, and found seattered over the surface. These nodules are well filled with fossil remains of both bivalve and univalve shells, in the condition of casts and impressions. They are mostly such forms as are found near the base of the Lower Green Marls, or in the Crosswicks and Haddonfield Micaceous Clays. 22 PALEONTOLOGY OF NEW JERSEY. The next zoological horizon is that of the Lower Green Marls proper, in which are found by far the most of the Cretaceous fossils yet recognized within the State. The number of species so far exceed those of any of the other beds named above as scarcely to bear comparison, the number of Mollusea alone being 303 species out of a total for all formations of 441. These fossils are, however, like those of the other beds, found mostly in the condition of internal casts, or casts representing partially the interior cav- ity, but they also carry on them the imprint of the external markings to a partial extent. Very few of the specimens preserve even a replacement of the original substance. The Ostreid@ and Spondylide are notable exceptions to this rule, being generally found with the substance of the shell entirely preserved, but so friable as to be easily destroyed after collection. In the Micaceous Clays of the Crosswicks Creek and Haddonfield beds, however, the substance of the shells is entirely preserved, both of bivalve and uni- valve species. In the Middle Marls a fauna almost entirely distinct from that below presents itself, Gryphea vesicularis, and two species of naticoid shells being all that are yet known to pass into it from below; even the Gryphea is here presented under a varietal form not common in the Lower Marls. In this bed some of the species are represented by great numbers of individ- uals, the Teredo, Gryphea and Terebratula being the most abundant. At the base of the Upper Marls another entirely distinct fauna is found, still presenting Cretaceous features. In this layer also few species are rep- resented, and, so far as I am aware, no locality has yet been found where they occur in any abundance; and no species have yet been observed in it that are common to either of the others below. Above this fossiliferous layer at the base of the Upper Marls occurs a series of beds of consider- able thickness in which no molluscan remains have been detected. Many vertebrate fossils have been discovered, however, showing a quite remark- able break in the molluscan life in the seas of the New Jersey area, extending to the top of the Upper Marls, where occurs the Eocene layer. This contains a fauna entirely distinct from that of either of the beds below, being composed not only of different species, but largely of different genera, GASTEROPODA OF THE LOWER GREEN MARLS. 23 and even several families not represented in the lower strata make their ap- pearance. The molluscan remains found in this formation at Shark River, Farmingdale, and Squankum, are also in the condition of casts, like those in the Cretaceous, even the Ostreide seldom preserving the least vestige of the shell substance. In these Eocene beds the species again become quite numerous. Al- though not as abundant as in the Lower Green Marls, they far outnumber those of the intermediate beds. Considering the few localities and the slight thickness of the beds examined they have been prolific, having yielded a total of 79 mollusean species, of which 23 are Lamellibranchiates, 52 are Gasteropods and two Cephalopods, besides fragments of some eight or ten other Gasteropods, the specimens of which are not sufficiently well preserved for description and illustration. The following tables present more readily the numbers of families, genera and species of molluscan remains occurring in the several formations, and the relative proportions known from each bed. Table No. 1 shows the number of genera and species of Lamellibranchiates represented under each family in each bed except the Crosswicks Creek and Haddonfield bed, which are included in the Lower Green Marls, while Table No. 2 shows the same features per- aining to the Gasteronods and Cephalopods. 24 PALEONTOLOGY OF NEW JERSEY. TARLE No. 1.—Showing the number of genera and species of Lamellibranchiates wnder each family occurring in each of the several marl beds in New Jersey. | aie Camden Lower | Middle Base of | rocene plastic | clays. | marls. | marls. upper | mmarls. clays marls. Genera. Species. —$__——|—_ >=) = g2/Sid/3/g sie /el/eisidis e/2/2|2|2/2/3|2|3|2/3|2 S|HNISO|nl/O|nl/SO|/n/H | nj/O|m Class LAMELLIBRANCHIATA. Order ASIPHONIDZ. Suborder Monomyaria. | Family Ostreidw......------ 4) 3] 9) 2) Bh 2s <2 ea as Anomiide ..-...----- 3 3 Be Hated Boel east hs lite Pectinide ..-....--.- 4 4|11}. Soe a Tolga Spondylide .....--- 4 CU ees Bere eee! eee ee fees Suborder Heteromyaria. Family Mytilidw . ....-.--- 3 OT et ceed sel Pell ctf cleat amt TP fim be) sia at Peal Pteriide .......----- 4 OH Reset lease Ree cee (ec | 10 ERE Al Hela see |i Pinus} o--=--ee es 1 73 Pe ees Peers lec Gat jee i) ) a bi eee Feo) i Io Suborder Dimyaria. | Family Arcid# ......---.--- 8 21}. --. ee | East e Ss | agen eeeek a) oeseatl eel] ea) wccden| (ened Nucolida........--- a] 9/22 | ee a i Hee ee ec oan aS Isocardiidw....-.--.|--------|-------- seallesea| seme se en 1) 1).---J.---[.-- Trigonid@ .-..-.----. 1 BS ery | jaan 1| 3)..-.] .. |.---}e---/.-- |--- Unionidw.......---- 2 PBs. MARY heed eee kere rose Hees Pace bee ses Order SIPHONID2. eet a lar Suborder Integropalliata. | | | | | | Family Astartide .......... 2 6 |. | Gstee oes ne (ae a © | Crassatellide .....-. 4 19 |. | Sqaleseeleees a ® | Lucinide ........--. 1 2. Oe ee) fies Fee calla Chamide ........--- 1 rh V Sag fos 2h Sa EEA Sa | Cardiide ......----- 7 15 |. spi Ere Raa pels obo y po Cyprinide.....-...- 4 11 8} 1] 1} 1] 1).---].-- Cyrenidz-.......... 1 2 Bee Rees pene ood pecs tein | |p Suborder Sinnopalliata. Family Veneride..-.-..--..- 6 fT) Peed Sel rsd bec fe toe ON a sal (erie Uy able at Petriculide......-.. 1 EN pes Bonet Seeel bc edloo- see Sethe Mop Ab ecerlisec Tellinidw......-.... 5 Gf see) ae Sco) coed atl jena Donacid@.......-... 1 UN cae oe |Masaleoca olhyyarit Mactride ........... 2 (Sica) BY \oecllsace|) why) Baie Anatinide .......... 3 Dl tee | ete Pe becd ieee Corbulidz .....-..-- 2 FH (se No eed ce bs Gn Saxicavide -........ 1 PN Ease Read Baca RRee pean ht Solenidz. . 4 5 |- = Sere Sa in Pholadide 3 Eel BSS sce bac Vaart fe wea ic Teredide ..- | 1| Sileees| eae | BSc fe ea Gastrochenida -.--. 2 Dl ere mista See eeceted ea [ s9| waa |... Bil Sezc| a (ees ta ! Probably fragment of a Gasteropod. GASTEROPODA OF THE LOWER GREEN MARLS. Summary of the foregoing table. ] Families. Genera. | Genera. Species. Lower Species. 4) 4 5 1 | 2 12 27 76 | 155 8 9} 1 12 13 | 16 12 17 | 23 Middle | B88°°f| Focene marls. | 2PPEF | mars. marls. Plastic clays ....--.---------- FPOOCC OPS C HCE Sees Cero Camden clays ...--------- ---- Seeeae Se meehS Sem =anan «ecme Lower marls..----.----..-------+-+----- eee earn ema Middle marls ........--..------0 eee eee ee eeeee ee seoceesos Base of upper marls ....--..--- Slices eenedena=cleesvieslacace= Eocene matls .......-.-- eee oores en oae oo comee eee . Families. Brachiopoda: Terebratulide ....... beep =p i eaacocecacac 1 Lamellibranchiata.......-...-..----- need cos 31 Gasteropoda .........----.--- ceante! Bo eHE SSeS 30 Cephalopoda. .......----.---------+++- erncoacce 3 | 2 g9| 202 | 155 u 16 23 ao | 190) 127 7 7 52 13 24 19 css Rae 2 alee eee ee 303 23 | | 79 1 Probably fragment of a Gasteropod. 25 26 PALEONTOLOGY OF NEW JERSEY. TABLE No. 2.—Showing number of Gasteropoda, genera and specres under each family, occurring in the several beds. Lower Middle | Base of up marls. marls. per marls. & ) $ i=] 2 Total genera. Total species Genera. Species Genera, Species Genera. ets Genera, Species. Class GASTEROPODA. | Subclass PROSABRANCHIATA. Order PECTINIBRANCHIATA. Family Muricidw-.-.-.-..----- Tritonid# -.-..-. seeece| Purpurid@ .-.....----- Rsidie 2-2 eo amen Fasciolariide ..--..--. Buccinids ............ Cypreid@ ............ GQnustidie-2<2--. - Pleurotomariid#...... 4 Uf Rape 2 =\o==-- 2 2 1 1 2 4 Suborder Edriophthalma. Family Patellidw ............. | Subclass OPISTHOBRANCHIATA. | Order TECTIBRANCHIATA. | Family Tornatellid.....-- -- a 12 es | shoasleoecee | paepenerecees 3 3 EBullides sot ee oer ieee ie) 1 nl ec etree 1 1) |e ele Class SCAPHOPODA. | Family Dentalide Totals (30 families) -........-....-....-- Class CEPHALOPODA. Order TETRABRANCHIATA, Family Nautilidw.......... Ammonitids .__... Order DIBRANCHIATA. Family Belemnitide ................-- ie) S 5 E a 8 : H H row Cl CS CC SCC CC CS | Total (3 families) -=---- .2<. s GASTEROPODA OF THE LOWER GREEN MARLS. re | This gives for the molluscan fauna of New Jersey, including the Brachiopoda: Cretaceous. | Eocene. | Total. | 5 ae | : | Brachiopoda...-....-.-. ..---.-----.----------- 5 | 2g 7 Bamelibranehiatas.<. 262.1 s=-cs+.cace=.aoc=- 199 | 23 222 COPEL Ee oe SS ORS Se ee SA en 136 52 188 Cepia onodacescssas eeseewtianaeseecine= tonne sone 22 | 2 24 RRA rece Band Hepa ep 5d ene ene eee 362 79 441 Giving a total of 441, or deducting the two naticas and grypheea, which are counted also in the Middle Marls, a total of 428 described species. Were the localities critically examined many others would undoubtedly be obtained, as a number of casts are already recognized as distinct from any of the described forms, both in the Cretaceous and Eocene beds. Of the Brachiopoda above enumerated the Terebratula Harlani and Terebratulina lachryma are also known to oceur in South Carolina, and T. floridana is common at some localities in Alabama. Of the Lamelli- branchiates of the Lower Marls, three species are known in Europe, and the number attributed to certain American States are as follows: Species. Ad OMe Ren reteset ae eoce Vatican aclemauicbewsc sues secicmeccnecucianac 41 SIGTITGEEC OES eS SSeS OSanorcae oo nO Resa enc -Fop arbor a Jeas cect ootbec ems coe 21 LUM ESTES A Da Sab ae Sens SS8nc Mase eat OS BA Sp RASS SED ERE NaC OC ROSSR Rose sca psae 21 PUSS A eon Rat eee emit tein tel aan st innin ame dae cocci aiae ase Guielcase ess tees auc 6 NOKGH: ALOU Remeron O hewem meme sano w cea crew orcs Son esaceninceranwaaas 20 i) Aare eee arate arte aa ao eatshoernere a caic au «) -cwle\sbea ssn m bone Seca eeueecteces s 4 A large number are found in States not here mentioned. Six of those from the Middle Marls also occur in other States, and but one species from the Eocene layers, Crassatella alta, is known to occur outside of New Jersey. In Table No. 3, the species which have been thus cited are given under the States wherein they are found, and the succeeding table, No. 4, gives the same for the Gasteropoda and Cephalopoda, few only -of which have been recognized beyond the State. 98 PALEONTULOGY OF NEW JERSEY. TABLE No. 3.—Showing Lamellibranchiates of New. Jersey formations recognized in other localities. Alabama Tennessee. Mississippi. Texas. Dakota. North Carolina. Arkansas. Europe. SPECIES FROM THE LOWER MARL BED&. Ostrea crenulimarginata, Gabb -.--------------- | plumosa, Morton...------------ subspatulata, Lyell and Forbes .- tecticosta, Gabb ...-.-.-.------- larva, Lam......-..------------0--------- Gryphwa vesicularis, Lam.....-.--------------- Exogyra costata, Say .---.---++----+++++++------ Anomia argentaria, Morton....-..-------------- tellinoides, Morton-..--..-------------- Pecten (Amusium) simplicam, Conrad. ..-.-.--- Neithea quinqueradiata, Sow..---------- ake Plicatula urticosa, Morton.......--.------+ ance Radula acutilineata, Conrad ---..--.------------ reticulata, Lyell and Forbes .--.-------- x Pay | aca emae| hestosase- Ss Jon) eae] eo denticuticostata, Lyell ......--.--------|------|.--+--|--2+++]------[o-- eee eee > tall SSG Mastin Lithodomus Ripleyanus, Gabb.....--.---- pees bocec4HeDsbe ON eel Soeeae crane el oe ioe Reena Gervilliopsis ensiformis, Conrad. TInoceramus Barabini, Morton .--..--.---------- 0 eee eto x NO nas peee ce] eae ee sagensis, Owen...-..-----------+=-+|------] -+20+|seeree| eee NOs 420) pears! pean seed Vanuxemi, Tuomey ..-.------------| % |------|------|------ SO | Ee Shel ece mod Iokecice: Pinna laqueata, Conrad...-.. Nemodon Eufaulensis, Gabb ........--------- brevifrons, Conrad ...-..---..-------- Breviarca Saffordi, Gabb ..--.--.-------------- Trigonarca cuneiformis, Conrad Idonearca Tippana ...-..--.-------+--+++--+---- antrosa, Morton -......--------------- Nucula percrassa, Conrad .....----------------- perequalis, Conrad........------------- Nuculana protexta, Gabb-.....----------+------ - longifrons, Conrad -..-.-------------- Perissonota protexta, Conrad......---.--------- Trigona Eufaulensis, Gabb..-...--------------- Crassatella cuneata, Gabb ..-------------------- Monmouthensis, Gabb..-....-..----- subplana ..-....-..----.-0-----+--=- vadosa, Morton...........-.-------- Astarte octolirata, Gabb. crenulata.....-..-- Cardium Enfaulensis, Gabb - - Ripleyanum, Conrad . -- Criovardium multiradiatum, Gabb. dumosum, Conrad - .-- Leiopistha protexta, Conrad... Cymella Meekanum. ........-..---.--------000e- GASTEROPODA OF THE LOWER GREEN MARLS. 29 TABLE No. 3.—Showcing Lamellibranchiates of New Jersey formations recognized in other localities - Continued. North Carolina. Alabama Mississippi. Arkansas Europe. “e = | Sa m= == ae | SPECIES FROM THE LOWER MARL BEDS—cont'd. Veniella Conradi, Morton...........------------ trapezoidea, Conrad ........-----.----- Aphrodina Tippana, Conrad .......--.--.------- Cyprimeria depressa, Conrad .-.....-..--.------ Tellimera eborea, Conrad Linearia metastriata, Conrad Z£nona Eufaulensis, Conrad, ...... Pholadomya occidentalis, Morton. -... Corbula crassiplicata, Gabb .-..... --- subcompressa, Gabb ........-- Leptosolen biplicata, Conrad....-..---- Legumen planulata, Conrad .....-.--.---.------ appressa, Conrad . .................... x oe Nae sel BASES OR eck ae na) | RA en |e a Teredo irregularis, Gabb ...............-------- Me | Godse bee sed boees| | wot fodsod Baraes Raesee bass MIDDLE BED. Gryphwa vesicularis, Lam......-..--..--+.----- x S| Aer | tee rene [Sot wallace | x pee eeet op Cpa eS ee ea ae eed | ge | Pe 6) pcaseae| | ce mer x Isocardia Conradi, Gabb .....-...---.--.- Gastrochena Americana, Gabb EOCENE MARLS. Gryphea vesicularis, Lam..-......-....---...... Crassatella alta, Conrad .............--.-------- Be eee feesec Sone Bec ericee ieee (errs es 30 PALEONTOLOGY OF NEW JERSEY. TABLE No 4.—New Jersey Cretaceous Gasteropods and Cephalopods recognized at other localities. 3 glalB| 3 Ai) aloe he laaeilee SN eS alec a al nee Mics a | Aturia should have or funnel-shaped, but tubular and gradually tapering.’ a funnel-shaped, dorsal siphon, which this species has not, consequently can not be a true Aturia. Dr. Tuomey’s N. orbiculatus, which was Conrad’s type of Helicoglossus, is probably at least generically if not specifically identical with this, so that this will at least fall under that genus. Formation and locality: I think there can be no reasonable doubt of the authenticity of the locality of the specimen used and figured, being as marked on the label attached: Glassboro, Gloucester County, New Jersey. Prof. Cope states under his description that it was found at Heritage’s marl pits associated with Terebratula Harlani and Teredo tibialis, which would place it in the Middle Marls. There is also in the Academy’s collection parts of two chambers of the same species from Vincentown, New Jersey, collected by T. M. Bryan, Esq., which would also most probably be from the Middle Marls, as both these and the Upper Marls are near together at that point. - Another fragment in dark brown material occurs in the tray with the frag- ments of Am. telifer, marked simply “N. J.” CEPHALOPODA OF THE CRETACEOUS MARLS. 249 AMMONITID. Genus AMMONITES Brug. AMMONITES COMPLEXUS. Plate xxi, Figs. 5-7. Ammonites complexus Hall and Meek: Mem. Am. Acad. Arts and Sci., Boston, new ser., vol. 5, p. 394, Pl. 1v, Fig. 1; Gabb, Synopsis, p. 9; Meek, Check List, p. 24; Geol. Surv. New Jersey, 1868, p. 730; Invert. Paleont., U. S. Geol. Surv. Terr., vol. 9, p. 447, Pl. xxiv, Fig. 1. A single fragment only of this species has so far been recognized from New Jersey. It consists of less than an inch in length of a volution having a less diameter than the original specimen figured by Messrs. Hall and Meek; but it appears to have had a somewhat greater curvature, and consequently has the appearance of having been a somewhat larger shell, though from this imperfect fragment it would be difficult to say positively that such was the case. The volutions were nearly circular in section and strongly em- bracing, nearly one-third of the outer one having overlapped the inner one. It has been crossed by low, rounded, transverse ridges, and broad, shallow furrows, without nodes; the ridges becoming almost obsolete on the central line of the back. Septa extremely complex and very closely arranged; so closely that the branches of one septum interferes with and overlaps the one behind it, so as to make it extremely difficult to trace the division of any one septum even as far as the fragment preserves them. The extremities of the digitations are slender and quite mucronate, presenting almost the same features as those of Placenticeras tilifer. In this respect it differs from all other species yet observed in the New Jersey formations except that one. ‘The dorsal lobe is more than half an inch long, and only slightly divided below on the median line; the main divisions are separated each into three compound divisions, each of which has many mucronate points; above this there is one principal digitation on each side which has three terminal points, and one or two farther up on each side. The first lateral lobe has three terminal compound divisions, with one smaller division on each side above, and a minor one still higher. The second lateral lobe is 250 PALEONTOLOGY OF NEW JERSEY. somewhat smaller than the first, but its divisions and branches are not trace- able on the specimen. The first sinus is about equal in size to the first lateral lobe, and is divided at the summit into three double divisions by three minor lobes, each of which has several points along the sides and on the extremity. The specimen differs somewhat in details of the septa from the Upper Missouri River specimen originally described by Hall and Meek, as well as in having a greater circle of curvature along the circumference of the volu- tion, and the volution has also been relatively narrower from side to side: These differences, as well as the sharply pointed form of the divisions of the lobes of the septa, lead one to suspect that were the specimen more perfect a very differently shaped species would be the result. Still, from the very imperfect and unsatisfactory material, it would hardly be safe to designate it as a distinct species. Formation and locality: The fragment is from a whitish clay marl with ferruginous markings, but is without locality. It has the lithological characteristics of the white limestone clay at Holmdel, New Jersey, and is most probably from the Lower Marl Beds at that place. The specimen is from the cabinet at Rutgers College, and is that upon which Mr. W. M. Gabb made the identification of the species in his Synopsis, p. 9, and bears his label. AMMONITES DENTATO-CARINATUS. Plate xu1, Figs. 3, 4. Ammonites dentato-carinatus Roemer : Texas, p. 417 ; Kreid. von Texas, p. 33, Pl. 1, Fig. 2, a, b,e; Gabb, Synopsis, p. 9 ; Meek, Check List Cretaceous, p. 24. 5: A single small fragment of this species comes to me from the collection of the Acad. Nat. Sci. at Philadelphia, labeled as coming from the Creta- ceous of New Jersey, and there seems to be no valid reason for doubting the locality, as it bears resemblance to the white limestone nodules from Marlboro and Holmdel, New Jersey. The specimen is but little more than an inchin length, and is afragment of a volution of medium size, rep- resenting about three of the chambers. The shell when entire has been CEPHALOPODA OF THE CRETACEOUS MARLS. 251 compressed discoidal, with a proportionally small umbilicus, the volutions have been sharp on the dorsal edge and marked by a series of undulations which gave rise to the specific name. The sides are ornamented by two lines of nodes which divide the surface into three nearly equal spaces, also by transverse ridges which are low and rounded, and pass from the margin of the umbilicus almost directly across the volution to a node one-third of its breadth from the margin, and are then bent sharply forward, their con- vexity giving rise to the undulations on the dorsal carination. Some of the ridges bifurcate at the inner line of nodes, each branch reaching the margin as independent ridges, but the fragment is too small to show how frequently this feature occurs. The septa of this specimen from New Jersey appear to be as nearly like that figured by Dr. Roemer, above cited, as could be expected in any two individuals from the same locality, consisting of a proportionally large dorsal lobe and three lateral lobes, visible on the side of the volution, with another just within the limits of or on the side of the umbilicus. The dorsal lobe has the main divisions bifurcating, forming two nearly equal branches, with numerous slender digitations ; the other is single, slender, elongate, and with five or six digitations. The first lateral lobe is large and somewhat complicated, having five principal divisions with numerous digitations. The other lobes are much smaller and less complicated, but all have slender, narrow digitations. Between the dorsal and first lateral lobe there is a long slender intermediate lobe with three to five digitations on a side. The sinuses are less complicated than the lobe, and have the terminations usu- ally rounded, while those of the digitations of the lobes are usually sharply pointed and narrow. The specimen bears no evidence of the siphon. Formation and locality: The specimen, which is a small fragment only of a single volution, is entirely a cast in a hard ferruginous sandy clay, with a few grains of glauconite scattered through it, and may have come from the white limetone nodules near the base of the Lower Green Marls, at Holmdel, Marlboro, or some of the other outcrops of this material within the State. As it is the only fragment of the species yet noticed, there may be some question as to its locality until others are fi yund. 252 PALEONTOLOGY OF NEW JERSEY. AMMONITES DELAWARENSIS. Plate xxi, Fig. 6-9; and Plate xxi, Figs. 1, 2. Ammonites Delawarensis Morton: Am. Jour. of Science, Ist ser., vol. 18, Pl. 11, Fig. 4; Synopsis, p. 37, Pl. 2, Fig. 5; Gabb, Synopsis, p. 9; Meek, Check List Cret., p. 24; Geol. Surv. N. J., 1868, p. 730. Dr. Morton describes this species as follows: ‘‘Volutions uncertain; each whorl furnished with elevated transverse ridges, which bifurcate about half way across, and terminate in prominent tubercles on the margin; ridges marked by three or four conspicuous nodes; back between the tubercles convex; probable diameter from 8 to 12 inches.” The shell seems to have been a very variable one, especially so when different periods of growth are considered. The young form was described by Dr. Morton as A. Vanuxemi, in which condition it is somewhat discoid, with a moderately large umbilicus with vertical sides; about one-half only of the volution being embraced by the succeeding one; the narrow dor- sum being triply keeled; the marginal keels being formed of obliquely elongated nodes formed by the extremities of the numerous, rounded costz which cross the sides of the volution. A row of nodes marks the ends of the costee along the margin of the umbilicus, and three other lines occur at nearly equal distances apart, between the first and the marginal row, which forms the lateral keel. When more advanced in growth the sides become rounded and convex; the dorsum proportionally wider and less distinctly keeled; the volutions somewhat more involved within the outer one, which gives a correspondingly narrower umbilicus in proportion to the entire diameter; the ridges crossing the sides are proportionally less ele- vated and the nodes less conspicuous. In a large cast sent me, as one of the type specimens, from the Acad. Nat. Sciences, Philadelphia, the thick- ness at the edge of the umbilicus is 23 inches, when the width of the volu- tion is 34 inches. A small specimen (figured on Pl. xu, Fig. 6), apparently entirely uncompressed, presents a width on the side of the volution of three- eighths of an inch, and a diameter of one-sixteenth less at the edge of the umbilicus. The same features of the surface are present on both speci- mens, differing only in degree. a CEPHALOPODA OF THE CRETACEOUS MARLS. 253 The septa are marked by three lobes and an imperfect fourth one on the inner margin, and by three sinuses. The dorsal lobe has a pair of short, principal, digitate branches, with several small digitations along its sides. First lateral lobe moderately large, with four principal, much ser- rated branches, and two or more minor ones on the neck. The second lateral is irregularly branched, having two or three divisions, and the one bordering the umbilicus has the margin simply undulated. The first sinus is very large and divided in the middle by a long, slender, digitate, minor lobe, which extends nearly or quite half the length of the dorsal lobe. The second sinus is not more than two-thirds the size of the first, and far less distinctly divided. The small umbilical sinus has the margin rather deeply undulated only. The margins of the sinuses are clavately undulated, and those of the lobes more sharply serrated; the number and complication of these features varying of course with the size and age of the shell. In the young specimens, which have the characters of A. Vanuxemi Morton, the complications of the lobes and sinuses are more simple, although all the features are present, as may be seen by the diagrams given on the plate. In Dr. Morton’s figure in his synopsis the septa are very incorrectly represented, while the nodes and ridges are very strongly shown. Formation and locality: The type specimens are all from Delaware, so far as Lam aware. Dr. Morton gives the Delaware and Chesapeake Canal, and states that he had another from Alabama. I have not seen it from else- where than Delaware and New Jersey. The small specimen figured on our plate is from near Burlington, New Jersey, and is in the Am. Mus. of Nat. Hist. AMMONITES VANUXEMI. Plate xu, Figs. 1-5. Ammonites Vanuxemi Morton: Am. Jour. Sci., Ist ser., vol. 18, Pl. m1, Figs. 3, 4 ; Synopsis, p. 38, Pl. u, Figs. 3, 4. A. Delawarensis (young specimen) Gabb: Synopsis, p. 18. Not A. Vanuxemi Lea: Trans. Am. Phil. Soe., 2d ser., vol. 7, p. 254, Pl. vin, Fig. 5. This species appears to have been described from specimens of small size, and imperfect. Dr. Morton remarks under the description given in his Synopsis, p. 38, that the ‘supposed diameter” is 3 inches; also, that “larger 254 lALEONTOLOGY OF NEW JERSEY. specimens have been found.” The type specimen came from Delaware. The largest New Jersey example which I have seen is figured on the plate as above. It bears all the characters of Dr. Morton’s species, but is somewhat compressed laterally, so as to give it rather less thickness, but it is certainly not the young of A. Delawarensis. On examining the type speci- men of this latter species, the inner coils of which have been entirely removed by decomposition, it is seen that up to a diameter of nearly 3 inches they would present much the same features as those possessed by this specimen; only that the transverse diameter has been nearly or quite an inch at the margin of the umbilicus, and that the sides are much more convex, while the keeled character of the dorsum is much less conspicuous. But it can readily be seen that all these features are liable to change with the degree of lateral compression. 'The features of the septa appear to be the same in two species, as will be seen by a comparison of the diagrams of the small individual, which is enlarged to two diameters, with that of A. Delawarensis, which is of mature size. The small individual from which the figures above alluded to were made is the property of the Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., and comes from Burlington County, New Jersey. The type of A. Vanuxemi originally figured by Dr. Morton, when compared with the inner coils of the large specimen of A. Delawarensis figured on our plate, is not more than half as thick laterally where the dorso-ventral diameter is the same; and the transverse ridges are finer, less elevated, and present an entirely different feature, which compression would fail to produce on forms like A. Delawarensis. Formation and locality: Mortou’s type was from the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal, and is from the lower part of the Lower Marls. The Bur- lington County, New Jersey, specimens would be from the same geological horizon. CEPHALOPODA OF THE CRETACEOUS MARLS. 255 Subgenus PLACENTICERAS Meek. AMMONITES (PLACENTICERAS) PLACENTA. Plate xx, Fig. 1, and Plate x1, Figs. 1 and 2. Ammonites placenta Dekay : Ann. N. Y. Lyceum Nat. Hist., vol. 2, p. 278, Pl. v, Fig. 2; Morton, Jour. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila., Ist ser., vol. 6, p. 195; Am. Jour. Arts and Sci., vol. 18, Pl. m, Figs. 1-3; Synopsis, p. 36, Pl. u, Figs. 1 and 2; Gabb, Synopsis, p. 15; Meek, Check List Cret., p. 25; Geol. Surv. N. J., 1868, p. 730. Placenticeras placenta (Morton) Meek: Invert. Pal. U.S. Geol. Surv. Terr., p. 465. Shell attaining a large size, subdiscoid or lenticular with a deep and distinet umbilicus, the sides of which are gently rounded to the surface of the volution, exposing only a very small portion of each of the inner volu- tions within it. Dorsum of the shell narrowly rounded and the sides of the volution gradually diverging from its edge to the point of greatest thick- ness, which is only a short distance outside of the umbilicus. Aperture eitate; on a cast before me where the volution has a width, from elongate sag the dorsum to the umbilicus, of 44 inches, the greatest thickness from side to side is just 2 inches, the diameter of the shell being 8} inches. The sur- face of the shell I have not seen on New Jersey specimens. Septa closely interlocking, the lobes and their sinuses being of propor- tionally small size, but very complicated, varying greatly in this particular with the age of the shell. The interlocking of the septa is so great in the very fine specimen mentioned above that it is impossible satisfactorily to trace any single one entirely across the volution. The lobes in the larger portion of the volution appear to be ten in number exclusive of the dorsal lobe, and to be somewhat smaller than the corresponding sinuses, except the second and third. The dorsal or siphonal lobe is very wide and deeply forked.- The third lateral lobe, or fourth counting the dorsal, is larger than any other, with two large lateral processes and a bifid extremity. The others are generally trifid to the fifth or sixth, beyond this a few of them are bilateral with two divisions on each side; some of the inner ones are long and clavate, with three or four slight projections, while the two inner ones are only serrate on the sides with a perceptibly swollen extremity. There are intermediate lobes between all the principal ones, except the last 256 PALEONTOLOGY OF NEW JERSEY. two, on the largest specimen in hand; but they vary in size and complica- tion according to their position; that dividing the first sinus being about equal in form and size to the seventh lateral lobe. The first sinus is large and broad, each of its main divisions about equal in size to the third sinus: Mr. Meek says in his Invert. Pal., p. 467, middle paragraph: On comparing authentic specimens from New Jersey with others of nearly equal sizes trom the Upper Missouri Cretaceous, they are found to agree well in form as well as in all essential specific characters of the septa. The New Jersey specimens generally have the septa less crowded and the lobes and sinuses propor- tionally somewhat shorter; but it is evident that no specific, or even subspecific, distinction can be based on such trivial differences. The large specimen now before me, which belongs to the collection of the Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila., was probably also in Mr. Meek’s hands while writing, and was inall probability compared with the diagram of the septum given of a western specimen, on page 466 of his work. But if any reliance whatever is to be placed upon the details of the septa of ammonites of simi- lar character for specific relations or differences, I can not see why these two should be considered as being specifically identical. There is not the slightest resemblance in detail between them, only a general resemblance. In fact, almost the direct opposite of details prevails between the two when examined side by side. The lobes in the New Jersey specimen all have very narrow, constricted necks with a broad expansion below, while his diagram shows a wide neck, usually narrowed gradually toward the ends, the lateral branches decreasing in size from above downward in all the principal lobes. The sinuses, which are broad, compact, and clavate in the New Jersey form, are narrower and much less conspicuous in his figure, with the divisions slender, lax, and contorted. If the two specimens are specifically alike, what reliance can be placed upon detail of septa for the identification of species? None of the New Jersey examples which I have seen show any indications of the lines of nodes on the side of the shell as in the western forms. To be sure they are all casts, but even on the casts of the western forms these nodes are usually indicated, and on comparison I find the differences in septa quite general as between them, and I am in- clined to conclude that they are either distinct species, or that those features which he with many others have considered as grounds for generic divi- ee ee ae CEPHALOPODA OF THE CRETACEOUS MARLS. 257 sions and subdivisions are only of specific importance, and that they have mistaken species for subgenera. Formation and localities: The species is found in the Lower Marl Beds quite generally throughout the State. - It is, however, never common, and is found mostly in detached fragments. It is known from near Burlington, from Mullica Hill, Neversink, Freehold, and many other places in New Jersey; it also occurs in Delaware. Mr. Meek, besides the western localities, gives in his Check List Mississippi, Alabama, Tennessee, and New Mexico. The species has been often cited from many different localities by various authors. I am, however, very skeptical as to the true identification of many of them. AMMONITES (PLACENTACERAS) TELIFER. Plate xu1, Figs. 10, 11. Ammonites telifer Mort. : Synopsis, p. 38, Pl. 2, Fig. 7; Gabb, Synopsis, p. 17. This species was named and figured by Dr. Morton in his Synopsis, from a small fragment of the cast of a chamber, which gives the details of only a part of one lobe of the septum, with small portions of others. No description of the species was given, and no locality mentioned. The frag- ment before alluded to is before me, with two others of much larger size, and are labeled as from New Jersey. The specimens are most probably parts of one individual, and were most likely all in Dr. Morton’s hands when he wrote his notice and gave the name. They are evidently frag- ments of a very large specimen having a close resemblance in general form to A. placenta De Kay, but are very different in the details of the septa, and consequently belong toa distinct species; therefore I think the name worth retaining, although it appears to have been dropped from many lists. The septa of the shell were very closely crowded, as shown on these fragments, for the ramifications of the lobes interlock and interfere one with an- other to such an extent as almost to defy an accurate figure or description. The great peculiarity, however, and that which seems to separate it from A. placenta, is the very extended and mucronate extremities of the ramifica- tions of both lobes and sinuses; there being so little difference exhibited between them as to render it extremely difficult to determine which are MON XVII 7 258 PALEONTOLOGY OF NEW JERSEY. the lobes or which are sinuses. There appear to have been three com- pound divisions of the lobes so far as can be seen on the fragments, and the principal sinuses seem to have been bilobed. The back of the shell has been round and on one of the fragments is seen to be about three- eighths of an inch thick, and the siphon correspondingly large. The dorsal lobe has been quite small, with three compound digitations on each side, in the only place in which it can be seen, and extends not more than a fourth of an inch below the upper line crossing the dorsum; outside of this is a short, slender, compound, secondary lobe which divides the large first lateral sinus into two principal divisions. The next lobe is large and has its branches extending below the sinus and upon the rounded dorsum of the shell. The entire details of this lobe can not be made out, but I have figured it as far as it exists, so it can be seen and compared with that of A, placenta given, from which it will be seen to differ very materially; too much to have been a part of an overgrown specimen of the same species. given with the specimens. They are from a hard, brown, highly ferruginous Formation and locality: There is no locality further than “N. J.” sand, somewhat different from any specimens which I have before seen, and T am inclined to think they may have come from the iron nodules found near the surface of the plastic clays. AMMONITES (SPHENODISCUS) LENTICULARIS. Plate x1, Figs. 8, 9. Ammonites lenticularis Owen, 1852, Rept. U. 8. Geol. Surv. Iowa, Wis., and Mis- souri, p. 579, Pl. vu, Fig. 5. Ammonites lobatus Tuomey, 1854, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila., vol. 7, p. 168; Meek and Hayden, ibid., vol. 8, p. 280; Gabb, Synopsis, pp. 12, 13; Meek, Check List, p. 24; Geol. Surv. New Jersey, 1868, p. 730. Placenticeras (Sphenodiscus) lenticulare (Owen) Meek: Invert. Paleont. U. S. Geol. Surv. Terr., vol. 9, p. 473. The above named species has been pretty generally recognized as a New Jersey fossil, although I have been able to obtain only very small fragments representing it, among all the collections to which I have had access. These are, however, of so marked a character as to leave no ques- tion of their identity. The fragments noticed consist, one of them, of casts CEPHALOPODA OF THE CRETACEOUS MARLS. 259 of three chambers, retaining two lobes and two sinuses each of two of them, and a single lobe and sinus of the third; the other fragment, a cast of several lobes and sinuses of chambers from near the umbilicus. They represent a specimen of large size, probably not less than 7 or 8 inches in diameter. Fig. 1.—Placenticeras (Sphenodiscus) lenticulare (Owen) Meek. (From U.S. Geol. Surv. Terr., vol. 9, p. 473.) In external features this species is much like Am. (Placenticeras) placenta De Kay, but is a little more spreading at the umbilicus, although the margin of the volutions are closer together, and it is usually sharply rounded on the back, instead of narrowly flattened as in that one until it is quite well grown, often to a diameter of 7 or more inches before it becomes rounded. Owing to the more spreading form of the umbilicus in this one, the point of greatest diameter is nearer to the middle of the width of the volution than in P. placenta, where it is quite near the inner margin. In the western forms of P. lenticularis there are sometimes very indistinct and distant folds on the surface, which radiate from the umbilicus, as shown by Mr. F. B. Meek on his figure in the Invert. Paleont., as above cited, Pl. xxxiv, Fig. la. I have not seen any indications of such a feature on any New Jersey examples of 260 PALEONTOLOGY OF NEW JERSEY. P. placenta. The principal point of difference between these species, how- ever, is in the form and details of the septal lines, as shown on the surface of the casts. On P. placenta they are much branched, both on the lobes and sinuses throughout, but in this form they are altogether more simple, the lobes having two or three obtuse points on each of the divisions, and the sinuses being simple for some distance from the umbilicus, then becom- ing biclavate and outside of the middle of the breadth of the volution often first irregularly triclavate, and sometimes with four clavate divisions in older specimens. In specimens of large size, however, from Missouri, they are seldom as strongly divided as those represented by Mr. Meek in his Fig. le, Pl. xxxrv, of the work just cited. In the fragments of chambers seen from New Jersey, although evidently from a specimen of large size, the sinuses appear to have been simply bilobed, the division between the lobes having two short points, while the lobes have the features shown in those of the sixth to the ninth lobes of Mr. Meek’s figures. There is no feature on the fragment by which I can definitely tell from what position within the breadth of the volution the one fragment came, so that I can only surmise as to the corresponding lobes of a more perfect specimen. But it is fair, probably, to suppose that it came from near the position above mentioned, as if not, or if it came from nearer the Outer edge, it would indicate a different form from the western shells. Formation and locality: The only fragment I have seen comes from the marl pits of J. S. Cook, Esq., near Tinton Falls, New Jersey, and are from the lowest layers of the Middle Marls, where they are associated with Nautilus Dekayi and small specimens of Baculites ovatus of the Lower Marls, as well as with many of the Molluscan remains of the Middle Marls, in a yellowish green marl sand, which appears to be peculiar to that horizon, if not to that locality. CEPHALOPODA OF THE CRETACEOUS MARLS. 261 Genus SCAPHITES Parkinson. SCAPHITES NODOSUS. Plate xiiv, Figs. 13, 14. Scaphites (Ammonites?) nodosus, Owen: Geo’. Surv., lowa, Wis., and Minn., p. 580, tab. 8, Fig. 4. Scaphites nodosus (Owen) Gabb: Synopsis, p. 33; Meek & Hayden, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila., vol. 12, p. 420; Meek, Check List Cret., p. 24; Invert. Paleont. U. 8. Geol. Surv. Terr., vol. 9, p. 426, and varieties; Whitf., Palebdnt. Black Hills of Dakota, p. 440, Pl. xm, Figs. 1-3. A fragment of the outer chamber of a Scaphites, which presents all the features of S. nodosus Owen, comes to me among the specimens from the Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. The specimen is without label of any kind, and is associated in the tray with S. hippocrepis. The fragment bears every lith- ological evidence of being from the green sands of New Jersey, and from the Lower Beds. It is the lower end of the outer chamber from near the last septum; having a little of the imprint of the convolutions of it near the lateral margin, and continues to a little beyond the commencement of the outer geniculation. It has a lateral diameter of 12 inches and a dorso- ventral diameter of 13 inches from the back to the line of the horizontal portion of the volution. The side is flattened and the back rounded; the latter part marked by small transverse furrows which arch slightly forward in crossing the shell, and are arranged so as to bring about five ridges with their furrows within the space of half an inch in length on the middle of the back. The side is marked by two lines of nodes, one at the lower angle of the volution, and the other a short distance below the ventral line. The last are inconspicuous, while the former are very strong, from three to four in an inch space, and those on the horizontal portion transverse and much larger; the others gradually growing smaller along the geniculation toward the aperture. The side between the lower line of nodes and the ventral margin is marked by strong transverse ridges, arising one from each of the lower lines of nodes, but in some eases two of them unite at the upper node, forming only one from that point to the ventral line; septa of course unknown from the specimen. The fragment gives evidence of haying attained a_size seldom exceeded by the species at its localities in the Black Hills of Dakota, where it is quite 262 PALEONTOLOGY OF NEW JERSEY. common, and from whence it was originally described. It is the first case of its notice in New Jersey, and, so far as I am aware, at any point east of the Missouri River. Since writing the above, three other fragments, of somewhat smaller size, have been noticed among the collections made by G. C. Schanck, in the white limestone nodules at the base of the Lower Green Marls, near Marlborough, New Jersey, having the same features, placing it beyond doubt as a New Jersey fossil. These are in the State collections at New Brunswick. SCAPHITES HIPPOCREPIS. Plate xuiv, Figs. 8-12. Ammonites hippocrepis De Kay: Ann. New York Lyceum, vol. 2, p. 5, Fig. 5. Not Ammonites hoppocrepis Morton: Jour. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila., Ist ser., vol. 6, p. 88, Pl. v, Fig. 5. Scaphites hippocrepis Morton: Synopsis, p. 41; Gabb, Synopsis, p. 32; Meek, Check List Cret., p. 24; Geol. Surv. New Jersey, 1868, p. 730. Scaphites Cuviert Morton: Jour. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila., 1st ser., vol. 6, p. 109, PI. Nalui, UBavee ile This species was originally described by Dr. De Kay from an imper- fect fragment, but subsequently redescribed, from a very perfect cast, by Dr. Morton in his Synopsis. The specimen which he used is now in my hands, together with the outer chamber of a much smaller individual. Dr. Morton’s specimen is ovate in general outline, with a very ventricose outer chamber, which has the greatest transverse diameter below the outer angle of the horizontal portion, a little within the point from which rises the line ot the hood-like aperture; above the point indicated the diameter rapidly decreases again to the line of the aperture. The inner coils, the number of which can not be determined, are laterally compressed, although they might be considered as ventricose for a shell of the genus, being nearly as large transversly as in a dorso-ventral direction, but in comparison with the very rapidly increasing outer portion of the shell, from the origin of the horizontal portion to the point of greatest diameter, this inner part seems quite constricted. From the position of the last septum, which terminates at the umbilicus of the inner part, the ventral margin rises abruptly, giving CEPHALOPODA OF THE CRETACEOUS MARLS. 263 an abruptly increased vertical height to the neck or straight part to the base of the aperture; the line of which is exactly rectangular to it, and slightly infolded on the edge; surface of the shell marked throughout by transverse undulations, small on the inner coils and frequently bifurcating, but directed straight across the shell from the ventral line. On the hori- zontal portion they are much stronger and coarser, and above the outer geniculation they again become as fine and close as on the inner coils. The shell is further ornamented by two lines of nodes along the sides; the outer lines the smallest on the outer chamber, the other line imperceptible on the coiled part. At the angle of the outer geniculation there exists the largest node of all and outside of it two or three smaller ones. Septa somewhat closely arranged, but rather simple in structure, composed of a dorsal and three lateral lobes; dorsal lobe with four divisions, two on each side of the central line, the first division doubly clavate, the other with four rounded projections on the outer side; second lobe, or first lateral lobe, with two main divisions widely separated, each of which is deeply bifur- cate, with slight lobations near their extremities; second lateral lobe small, clavate with a trilobed end; third lateral lobe only about half the size of the second, but of similar form; first sinus much wider and larger than the first lateral lobe, with four double divisions (one of which in the septum drawn is imperfect); second sinus with two double or bilobed divisions; third sinus simply bilobed, and the third simple; the septum figured and its details here given is the second from the outer chamber of Dr. Morton’s figured specimen and gives the details of course much more developed than would a septum at an earlier stage of growth. Dr. De Kay described this species originally from an imperfect cast of the outer chamber of only medium size, which appears to have been the property of the New York Lyceum, and was from Delaware. I have before me at the present time a similar specimen of somewhat smaller size, having only about half the diameter of the one figured, but showing the same features on a reduced seale. The species is peculiar among all the American Scaphites in the rapid lateral increase in size of the central por- tions of the outer volution, which gives it a peculiar form and appearance which will readily distinguish it. 264 PALEONIOLOGY OF NEW JERSEY. Formation and locality: One of the specimens, the one figured, came from the deep cut of the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal, and is from a highly ferruginous, siliceous sand, which belongs to the Lower Marl Beds of New Jersey. As it is so near the limits of the State, it will no doubt be found, if it has not already been found within the State. The smaller individual is of similar character, but of a fier material, with a large pro- portion of iron, which gives it a reddish brown color. Both specimens are from the collection of the Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. SCAPHITES RENIFORMIS. Plate xiv, Fig. 3. Scaphites reniformis Morton : Synopsis, p. 42, Pl. 11, Fig. 6. Scaphites hippocrepis (Mort.), young specimen, Gabb, Synopsis, p. 33. Scaphites subreniformis D’Orbigny: Prodrome Paléont., vol. 2, p. 214, No. 56, not S. reniformis Brug. , Dr. Morton describes this species as ‘‘ventricose in the middle, tapering rapidly at each end; with numerous costee that bifurcate laterally.” He gives the size as “less than [an] inch in length,” and states that only a sol- itary imperfect cast was found. Mr. Gabb, in his Synopsis, p. 33, appears to consider it a young specimen of S. hippocrepis De Kay, and so cites it. I do not know if Mr. Gabb saw the original specimen used and figured by Dr. Morton. The specimen is not now to be found, but in place of it there comes to me from the Academy’s collection a fragment of a Scaphites the figured type of S. ais Conrad, from Tippah, Mississippi, in the tray which should, according to the label in it, contain the type specimen. The spec- imen used by Dr. Morton may have been one of S. hippocrepis, but I can hardly think so; as if so, it would not have presented so large an umbilicus, that of S. hippocrepis being very small. I have before me some fragments of very small specimens of that species which are as finely annulated as that shown in Dr. Morton’s figure, but without more exaggeration or careless delineation than has been permitted in the great majority of his figures no such drawing could ever have been made from it. And after seeing the accuracy of most of Dr. Morton’s figures and determinations, and carefully studying the matter, I am most strongly inclined to the belief that S. reni- Jormis was a distinct form from S. hippocrepis and a valid species. CEPHALOPODA OF THE CRETACEOUS MARLS. 265 D’Orbigny in his Prodrome, p. 214, cites it as S. subreniformis Morton. To this Mr. Gabb in bis Synopsis under subreniformis takes exception. To me it is quite evident that D’Orbigny intended this name as a substitute only for Morton’s name, and that he accidentally omitted to state in con- nection with it that it was so meant; as in parenthesis he says (non Brug. 1790). Lhave, however, been unsuccessful in a search for further evidence of a Scaphites reniformis Brug. elsewhere. I have givenas good a copy of Dr. Morton’s figure of his S. reniformis as possible, in order to aid in the search for other specimens of the species, or the identification of the type should it be discovered. Formation and locality: The type specimen came from a friable maz, at Grove Mill, near Bordentown, New Jersey, and would pertain to the Lower Marl Bed. SCAPHITES IRIS. Plate xiv, Figs. 4-7. Scaphites iris Conrad: Jour. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila., 2d ser., vol. 3, p. 335, PI. Xxxv, Fig. 23; Gabb, Synopsis, p. 32; Meek, Geoi. Surv. N. J., 1868, p. 730. Scaphites Conradi Gabb: Synopsis, p. 32. Mr. Meek gives this species in his list of New Jersey fossils published in the Geol. Report for 1868, but does not include the name in his Smith- sonian Inst. Check List. Mr. Gabb cites it as a synonym of S. Conradi, to which type it undoubtedly belongs and is somewhat closely allied. Mr. Conrad in his original description says it differs greatly in the character of the septa. The septum which he describes as existing in a free or unfilled con- dition has since been destroyed, and the only one which can now be seen is so extremely small as to be entirely unreliable for comparison, and the external form of the types, the only ones known, differs in some essential particulars. The species may be characterized as follows: Shell small to medium size, almost circularly discoid, with laterally compressed volutions, espe- cially the inner coils, which are flattened on the sides and almost grooved on the back from the prominence of two lines of nodes along the dorsum. Body volution proportionally more expanded in one of the types, appearing somewhat inflated on the sides along the horizontal portion, the inner whorls °66 PALEONTOLOGY OF NEW JERSEY. being fully embraced up to the small umbilicus. Horizontal portion com- paratively short and the ventral margin slightly protruding as in S. hippo- crepis. Aperture unknown, but from the appearance of the tube near the outer geniculation it was apparently contracted both laterally and vertically as compared with the size of the tube on the straightened portion. Surface marked on the inner coils by comparatively fine and closely arranged transverse ridges which become coarser at the inner geniculation, and on the straight part and beyond are obsolete; also by two lines of pointed nodes on the dorsum, which are prominent, giving a sunken area or appar- ent groove on the dorsum between them. Outside of these lines another line of nodes occurs at the angle of the back, and two others, less distinet, on each side of the horizontal part of the outer chamber. Substance of the shell somewhat strong and on the specimens highly iridescent, whence the specific name. Septa not very complicated, but rather closely arranged, consisting of a moderately large dorsal lobe and three lateral lobes on each side, which rapidly decrease in size toward the umbilicus, on the very margin of which the third one is situated. The details of the lobes and sinuses can not be traced on any of the specimens in hand sufficiently well to construct a dia- gram thereof. The first sinus is much larger than the first lateral lobe, and all the divisions of both lobes and sinuses have rounded extremities, and are altogether more simple in their structure than those on a specimen of S. Conradi of the same size, which is the species most nearly related to it in general form and appearance among the American Scaphites. It also differs from it in the form of the outer chamber along the ventral edge and in the inflation of the middle portion of this part. It resembles that species greatly in being circularly discoid, or in the very short horizontal portion. Formation and locality: The specimens which I have examined, and which are probably all that have been obtained, undoubtedly came from Tippah County, Mississippi, from whence Mr. Conrad cites them. The specimen originally figured by Mr. Conrad comes to me in a tray marked ‘““S. reniformis Oret. N. J.,” undoubtedly an accidental displacement; while the specimens originally belonging in the tray are lost. I have seen no example from New Jersey myself that could be referred to this species, CEPHALOPODA OF THE CRETACEOUS MALLS. 267 although Mr. Meek cites it as from the State, probably basing his identifica- tion on those mentioned above. I give the species here to help in the identification should specimens of it be found in future, that the record may be as perfect as possible. SCAPHITES SIMILIS, nN. sp. Plate xiv, Figs. 1, 2. Shell small, the type specimen, the only one known at present, being only five-sixths of an inch in its greatest length, and although not quite finished at the aperture, would not exceed 1 inch were it continued to its entire size. Volutions laterally compressed, rounded on the back, and marked by fine transverse ridges to beyond the commencement of the outer chamber, beyond which point the ridges are larger and indistinct, especially on the sides. A single line of nodes marks the outer angle of the body volutions, and are largest opposite the middle of the horizontal portion of the coil. Septa not very crowded and rather simple, consisting of the dorsal lobe and three lateral lobes on each side outside of the umbilical cavity, which is quite small. Dorsal lobe moderately large, the lower branches not quite half as long as the height of the first sinus, the extremities rounded, and with a rounded protuberance on its outer side, above it there is one other projection on each side. First lateral lobe large, broadly flabelliform with six short blunt fingers arranged around its rounded end, and one other at the junction of the first sinus; second and third lobes small, and consist- ing of only a single bluntly rounded member each. ‘The first sinus equals the first lateral lobe in size, but is bilateral at the extremity, each division showing a slight indentation on the middle. The other sinuses are simple rounded sinuosities, but slightly broader than the corresponding lobes. The species resembles in miniature S. nodosus Owen, from the Creta- ceous of the Upper Missouri, and New Jersey, in its general form and fea- tures, especially so on the back in the marking of the surface. There is evidence, however, of only one line of nodes on each side, instead of two as is usual on that one, although by no means always developed. There is, however, a great and very marked difference in the form and details of the septa, as on a young specimen of S. nodosus of the size of this one they 268 PALEONTOLOGY OF NEW JERSEY. are found to present the small compound divisions seen in the larger speci- mens, although not so extreme. There can, therefore, be no real specific relation between the two in this respect, notwithstanding the great external resemblance.’ In the septa it more closely resembles S. hippocrepis De Kay, but if the diagram be compared with that of that one, it will be seen to be fundamentally so different that it could not be developed into it, besides the tube of this does not widen laterally on the outer chamber as does that one, neither is the ventral line of the horizontal portion widened as it is in S. hippocrepis. . Formation and locality: The specimen comes to me associated S. hippo- crepis in the same tray, all of which are marked on the label “Cret. N. J.;” but the specimen of that species figured by Dr. Morton in his Synopsis, which is one of them, came from the deep cut of the Chesapeake and Dela- ware Canal, in Delaware, and as this is closely like it in lithological char- acter, it probably came from the same locality. Collection of the Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. Genus TURRILITES Lamarck. TURRILITES PAUPER, 0. Sp. Plate xiv, Figs. 1-5. A single fragment of a Turrilites, consisting of one and one-third volu- tions of a species with a very rapidly ascending spire, has been observed among the New Jersey fossils. The coils of the spire are in close contact and the volutions are higher than wide, and show in the cast a moderately wide umbilical opening. The upper edge of the volution is angular where it unites with the one above, and within the angle the surface is concave where it has been in contact with the base of the coil above. The rest of the surfice is rounded, and covered by oblique, bifurcating, or duplicating vertical folds or ridges, and is also marked by two lines of nodes, one at about the middle of the volution and another near the lower part. The nodes occur on almost every alternate ridge, though not invariably so, and those of the upper line of nodes are not on the same ridge as the lower line. The ridges are strongly directed forward as they cross the volution from above to the lower side of the volution, and are visible even within the umbilicus, although faintly so. CEPHALOPODA OF THE CRETACEVUUS MARLS. 269 The fragment preserves only a single septum the details of which are given, enlarged to twice natural size in the figure on the plate, this having been the lower limit of the septate portion; the next higher septum being at the upper end of the fragment. The species is peculiar in its rapidly ascending spire; also in having the volutions higher than wide, instead of circular, and also in the numerous but very distinct vertical folds or ridges. The concave upper side of the coil showing the partial imbedding of the preceding volution will also serve to distinguish it from other described species 6f this country, they generally presenting round volutions while these are quite angular at the junction of any two. Formation and locality: From the Lower Green Marls, at Neversink Hills, New Jersey. Collection at Rutgers College. Genus HETEROCERAS D’Orb. HETEROCERAS CONRADI. Plate xiv, Fig. 9-14. Ammonceratites Conradi Morton: Jour. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila., 1st ser., vol. 8, p. 212, Pl. x, Fig. 1; Descrip. New Sp. Organic Rem. Cret. United States, 1842, p. 8. Helicoceras Conradi (Mort.) Gabb: Synopsis, p. 28; Meek, Check List, p. 25. Cirroceras Conradi (Mort.) Meek: Geol. Surv. New Jersey, 1868, p. 730. A single whorl of a species of Heteroceras, imperfect at both ends, and in all probability nearly if not quite the last whorl of the specimen, repre- sents the above synonyma. As will be seen by Dr. Morton’s original description, he considered it as almost a perfect individual, as he says in his remarks: ‘‘The terminal end is nearly complete and almost on a line with what appears to have been the mouth of the shell, and the two approach within a quarter of an inch of each other.” It is very evident, however, when the specimen is examined by the light of present information and knowledge of these peculiar shells, that the specimen, which is only an internal cast of the non-septate portion, it belongs to a. sinistrally coiled spiral shell, where the volutions have not been in contact one with the other, as, if they were extended far enough, they would overlap, leay- 270 PALEONTOLOGY OF NEW JERSEY. ing about a fourth of an inch between the whorls. The tube in its present condition is greatly compressed vertically, so that the height is only about two-thirds as great as the transverse diameter, and the back shows a decided crushing of the tube in the sharply angular dorsal crest of the specimen, which was undoubtedly rounded in its normal condition. The surface of the cast is marked by transverse undulations or ridges, which are rather sharply curved backward on the upper surface in their passage from the umbilical edge to the outer one, and less strongly curved forward on the under side of the volution. Near the position of the center of the outer surface of the volution there has apparently been a line of rounded nodes situated on the ridges, but not, however, on each one, and another series of nodes at about one-third of the width of the volution within the edge on the under side. At this inner line of nodes almost every second and third ridge unites, forming a single ridge from that point to the umbilical cavity, within which they appear to become obsolete. A second specimen, also avery much flattened cast of what seems to have been the deflected outer part of the tube, has. lost the nodes, and also to a very great extent the bifurcation of the costz, as on this part of the shell they form more regular encircling ridges, as the straightening of the tube relieves the crowding at the umbilical edge. A third specimen, quite lately obtained, consisting of the outer chamber and the deflected part of the tube, shows this part to have been suddenly bent obliquely down- ward to a length of 25 inches, when it is abruptly bent upward again in the same plane and nearly upon itself, so that the extremity of the tube, or aperture, must have been nearly under the umbilical portion of the older shell. The tube of this specimen is nearly circular, being a trifle higher than wide, the ridges are strong and distinct, and the two lines of nodes more easily observed; although owing to the deflection of the tube and its irregular growth the bifurcations take place quite irregularly and the nodes are also quite irregularly scattered, but always on the outer surface of the tube. Septa comparatively unknown. The last one shows imperfectly on the last specimen mentioned. There is apparently a rather large siphonal lobe with a strong branch on each side of the rather large siphon, which is eel ied CEPHALOPODA OF THE CRETACEOUS MARLS. 271 situated on the inside of the coil; besides this, there are apparently three principal lobes, situated, one on the line of the upper row of nodes, or nearly opposite the siphon, and a larger one midway between it and the siphon; the one on the upper side of the tube is much larger than that below. ‘There have also been secondary lobes between these primary ones. The sinuses have been correspondingly large and of unequal size, but owing to the wearing of the surface the details of structure can not be made out. This species differs very materially from any of those described from the west, in the details of structure. It is perhaps more like H. Newtoni, Whitf., from the Black Hills of Dakota (see Paleont. of the Black Hills, Pl. xv, Figs. 1-4) than any other, but it differs in being sinistrally coiled instead of dextrally as that one is. I. B. Meek also figures a species in the U.S. Geol. Surv. Terr., vol. 9, PL xxi, Fig. 4, but without name, which bears considerable resemblance to this one in surface detail. Formation and locality: According to Dr. Morton the type specimen was found at Arneytown, New Jersey, by Mr. T. A. Conrad, and would conse- quently be from the Lower Green Marls. The second specimen mentioned above is to all appearances from the same place; both of these are in the Aead. Nat. Sei., Phila. The third example is from the same position at Atlantie Highlands, New Jersey, and is in the collection at Columbia College. Genus SOLENOCERAS Conrad. In the Jour. Acad. Nat. Sci., Philadelphia, 2d ser., vol. 4, p. 284, Mr. Conrad proposed the above generic name as a division of D’Orbigny’s eenus Ptychoceras, using Dr. Morton’s Hamites annulifer as the basis for his diagnosis. The shells of D’Orbigny’s genus consist of a slender, tapering tube, which, after attaining a certain length, is suddenly and abruptly returned upon itself, the two portions being in close contact. Mr. Conrad supposed that in the case of Hamites annulifer Morton the outer section, or larger section, after having been returned upon the earlier part for a short distance had again become deflected away from it at a considerable angle. I am not aware that Dr. Morton’s species is positively known by any other than the type specimen, which is an internal cast of the outer chambers only, although Mr. Conrad cites it as occurring in Alabama as well as in New 272 PALEONTOLOGY OF NEW JERSEY. Jersey; and both Mr. Gabb, in his Synopsis, and Mr. Meek, in his Check List, follow him in citing it from both States. Mr. Gabb, although admitting the genus as a valid one, is inclined to dispute the deflection of the outer part of the tube. This would leave the genus to stand entirely upon the feature of the smaller tube lying ina groove of the larger one, as these two features are all that Mr. Conrad claims, his generic description being as follows: ‘Differs from Prycnocerus D’Orbigny, in the smaller tube lying in a furrow of the larger one, which is straight only for a short distance from the junction, and then suddenly recurved. Mr. Meek in his Invert. Paleont. of the U. 8. Geol. Survey, vol. 9, p. 410, places Solenoceras as a synonym of Ptychoceras, as he not only questions the deflection or recury- ing of the shell a second time, but objects to the enfolding of the smaller tube within a groove in the larger one being considered as of generic im- portance. On examining Dr. Morton’s specimen I think there is every evidence that can be derived from an internal cast of such a shell that the supposed deflection of the tube at.the outer end of the fragment is only the thickening and rounding out of the completed or adult aperture of the shell, as the cast of the opening has been contracted on all sides and made to form a completely circular aperture or opening. From the specimen known there is no evidence as to what form the earlier parts of the shell may have had, other than that it was most probably elliptical or slightly flattened in a transverse section and also very slightly bent longitudinally; but beyond the length of the fragment, which is only seven-eighths of an inch, there is no evidence whatever afforded, and I have never known of any other indi- vidual being seen, all references being made to this one individual. While working over the Cretaceous fossils from the Black Hills of Dakota, published in Capt. Jenny’s report of the Black Hills expedition, I found examples of shells having characters very much like the one from New Jersey, but not so finely annulated, in which the earlier portion of the shell was bent and curved in such a manner that, had the larger part of the tube been continued beyond about the same length as the same part of this New Jersey specimen, it would of necessity have been compelled to become deflected in precisely the direction and manner in which Mr. Conrad sup- posed that one to have been in order to have grown beyond that point. Beyond this I have very good reason to suppose that the embryonic portion CEPHALOPODA OF THE CRETACEOUS MARLS. 273 was coiled like the interior of a Scaphite or Ammonite, as I had one, having the septa of a Ptychoceras, which was so coiled, but which was destroyed accidentally before it could be figured. If I am correct in referring that specimen to one of the species of Ptychoceras, there described and figured (See p. 457, Pl. 16, Fig. 1), that one certainly would have been generically dis- tinct from the types of Ptychoceras and would probably prove congeneric with Dr. Morton’s species could better specimens be procured. Conse- quently I think it best to retain Mr. Conrad’s name for forms like that which I described and figured as above cited under the names Ptychoceras Meek- anum and P. crassum. In this case the generic diagnosis of Solenoceras would have to be changed somewhat as follows: SOLENOCERAS (as amended). Embryonic portions probably coiled forming one or more turns, beyond which the tube is deflected in a more or less direct line, or slightly bent to the end of the septate portion of the adult shell; terminal chamber recurved upon the septate portion, which it more or less embraces, the aperture may again be deflected from a right line where the younger parts are bent. Genus PTYCHOCERAS D’Orb.; Solenoceras Conrad. PTYCHQCERAS (SOLENOCERAS) ANNULIFER. Plate xv, Figs. 6-8. Hamites annulifer Morton: Jour. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila., Ist ser., vol. 8, p. 213, Pl. xa, Wig. 4; Extract, p. 9; Pl. 1, Wig. 4. Solenoceras annwulifer (Mort.) Conrad: Jour. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila., 2d ser., vol. 4, p. 284; Gabb, Synopsis, p. 33; Meek, Geol. Surv. N. J., 1868, p. 730. Ptychoceras (Solenoceras) annulifer (Morton) Meek: Check List Cret., p. 23. Shell small, known only from an internal cast of the chamber of habi- tation, which is rather less than a fourth of an inch in its greatest diameter, and only seven-eighths of an inch in length. The earlier portion of the shell appears to have been transversely elliptical in section, as it has left a broadly concave depressed area on the inner face of the outer chamber, which has a curvature very much greater than that of the outer face. Outer chamber contracted very slightly in diameter for a little more than the outer MON XVUI——18 274 PALEONTOLOGY OF NEW JERSEY. third of its length, but is again abruptly expanded just behind the aperture; the opening itself having been circular and smaller than the tube behind it. Surface of the cast finely and closely annulated, the annulations having a direction just perceptibly backward in crossing from the inner to the con- vex surface, and count just eight annulations in the space of one-fourth of an inch on the largest part of the outer tube; on the inner concave face the annulations are somewhat finer, as many of them are doubled at the edge of the concavity, giving in the aggregate nearly one-third more annulations within a given distance. On the back of the cast two lines of minute nodes, marking the crests of the annulations for a short distance behind the aper- ture, are faintly perceptible under a good magnifier. On the posterior extremity of the outer chamber the lobation of the last septum is obscurely marked, showing a moderately strong dorsal lobe, with a larger lateral lobe on each side, while a large bilateral sinus has occupied each edge with a lobe on each ventral side, and a very small ven- tral lobe on the inner surface. The details of the lobes and sinuosities are, however, too badly defined to be traced. The surface of the shell of the septum is beautifully iridescent, and slight traces of iridescence are percepti- ble on other parts of the cast. The specimen here used and figured is Morton’s type of the species, and is also that used by Mr. Conrad for the type.of his genus Solenoceras. As yet no other has been observed so far as I can ascertain. It differs from the species described as Ptychoceras Mortont by F. B. Meek in his Vert. Paleont. U. 8. Geol. Survey of the Terr. p. 412, Pl. xx, Fig. 4, in the direction of the transverse ridges which are more direct, and possibly in their beng somewhat finer and more regular; on the whole, however, it is very similar. From P. Meekanum Whitf., of the Black Hills report, it differs much more widely in that that species is more coarsely annulated, and the annulation much more acute and oblique. Formation and locality: The type specimen, as stated under the original description by Dr. Morton, is from the Lower Green Marls, at the Deep Cut of the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal, Delaware. It is very probable, however, that by careful observation it might be discovered in the Lower Marls in New Jersey. The specimen is in the collection Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. CEPHALOPODA OF THE CRETACEOUS MARLS. Zia Genus BACULITES Lamarck. BACULITES OVATUS.’ Plate xLvi, Figs. 3-9. Baculites ovatus Say: Am. Jour. Sci., vol. 2, Ist ser., p. 41; vol. 6, Pl. v, Figs. 5 and 6; Morton, Am. Jour. Sci., vol. 17, p. 280; vol. 18, Pl. 1, Figs. 6-8; Jour. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila., 1st ser., vol. 6, p. 89, Pl. v, Fig. 6 (and 5 ?); Synopsis, p. 42, Pl. 1, Figs. 6-8 (the latter perhaps doubtful) ; Gabb, Synop- sis, p. 22; Meek, Check List (in part), p. 23; Geol. Surv. New Jersey, 1868, p. 730. The examples of this species as they occur within the State of New Jersey are pretty generally internal casts and usually only small detached fragments of a few chambers each. Occasionally one is found which will preserve the inner layers of shell, but even this appears to be quite rare. One of the examples figured by Dr. Morton, Pl. 1x, Fig. 1, of his Synopsis, is in this condition, and is the only one which I have seen preserving even this much of the shell. The specimens do not appear to attain a very great diameter, the largest observed having a diameter of not more than 14 inches in the longest axis. They appear to have enlarged upward very slowly with the increased length, but are by no means uniform in this respect, not even in different parts of the same individual. The exterior of the shell, so far as can be determined from the cast, must have been smooth except for a few undulations on the edges, more particularly so on the siphonal edge, where they are somewhat evenly arranged, at least on the younger speci- mens. The general form of the shell in section is supposed to be ovate, 'The following is Say’s original description of B. ovatus, taken from Am. Jour. Sci. and Arts, Ist ser., vol. 2, p. 41: “ Baculites ovata, elongate; transverse septa subovate, six-lobed, and a smaller one behind; lobes of the superior faces of the septa, three on each side, with a minute one between each, dentated at their edges; anterior lobe (nearest the siphuncle) small, not sinuous; second lobe with a single projection each side and sinus at tip; third lobe dilated, with a small sinus each side and more obtuse and pro- found one at tip; posterior lobe hardly larger than the lateral intermediate ones. **Greatest diameter of the transverse section, one inch and one-fifth; smaller diameter, seven- tenths; length of the segment about half an inch.” The specimen used was the same as that used and figured by Dr. Morton in the Jour. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila., Ist ser., vol. 6, pp. 89 and 196, Pl. v, Fig. 6, and was from the Lower Green Marls at Never- sink Hills, N. J., while the B. compressa described by Say on the same page as above was from Nuttal’s collection, made on the Upper Missouri River. 276 PALEONTOLOGY OF NEW JERSEY. but it is difficult to determine how far this feature may be reliable. Many of them are decidedly ovate, others so slightly so as to make the feature difficult of detection, while by far the most of the examples which I have seen would be called oval by anyone not expecting to question the form. The septa are closely arranged in some and in others somewhat distant, while they are not infrequently quite irregular in distance in the same indi- vidual, and sometimes do not extend the entire distance across the tube, but interfere with and terminate against the one below, so as to count irregular on opposite edges of the tube. In one specimen which comes to me from the Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. this occurs twice within a length of an inch and a half, and all the septa in that distance are quite crowded. The septa have three lobes on each side of the tube and a small one on the ventral edge; while the siphonal lobe is simply bifid and the branches very small and short. The first dorsal lobe is much smaller than the others and directed somewhat inward toward the side or away from the dorsal edge. The second lobe is much larger and more numerously branched, while the third is still larger than the second as well as more complicated in structure and the ventral lobe quite small, short, and simple, but numerously digitate according to the size and age of the specimen. In detail the lobes and sinuses vary with size and age, but are almost as variable as the specimens are numerous, but in all the specimens which I have examined the second lobe is usually bilateral, nearly symmetrically so, and the sinuses in the lower half of the lobes are broad and rounded without serratures on their margins. Siphon situated just within the narrow edge of the tube and of rather large size. Shell marked on the outer portions in specimen of large size by undu- lations of growth indicating the outline of the aperture, and showing a considerable extension upward of the shell on both edges and a corre- sponding broad sinus on the sides, the extension on the siphonal side being much the longest. Formation and localities: In the Lower Green Marls throughout their extension in New Jersey and Delaware. Most common in Burlington County, New Jersey. Mullica Hill has also furnished many. The bluffs at Neversink, New Jersey, and Monmouth County have yielded some. CEPHALOPODA OF THE CRETACEOUS MARLS. DALE T One tray in the Acad. Nat. Sci. is marked “Vincentown, N. J., T. M. Bryan.” BACULITES COMPRESSUS. Plate xLvi, Figs. 1, 2. Baculites compressus Say: Am. Jour. Sci., Ist ser., vol. 2, p. 41; Morton, Synop- sis, p. 43, Pl. 1x, Fig. 1, and probably of most authors where western examples are considered. Among the specimens sent me from the Acad. Nat. Sci., at Philadel- phia, as New Jersey fossils, I find the type specimen of this species, used by Mr. Say in his original description, and afterward figured by Dr. 8. G. Morton as above cited. Mr. Say says that the specimen came to him from the collection made by Mr. Nuttal; that it was washed out from the banks of the Missouri River between White River and the Mandan settlements, . as stated by Dr. Morton. The specimen was owned by and loaned to Dr. Morton by J. P. Wetherill, Esq., and I find his initials still on it in ink. The specimen has the lithological character of the western specimens, and not that of the New Jersey fossils. The specimen is more compressed than are any of the New Jersey individuals when retaining their true form, and is slightly ovate, being narrower on the siphonal edge than on the opposite. In other respects it presents the common features of the others as to rate of taper, number and position of lobes, and generally so in details of bifurcation of the lobes, except in the divisions of the lobe nearest to the ventral edge, where the divisions are not always bilateral, there usually being a central much branched division, which results from a pressing over to one side of the principal part of the lobe by the greater size of or greater number of smaller branches on the side next to the ven- tral edge. This appears, however, to be more a defect in the specimen than a natural growth, as among a large number of examples of all sizes from the Fort Pierre group on Sage Creek, Dakota, I find this feature entirely absent; consequently it becomes quite impossible to find among western examples features in the detail of structure by which the two species of Mr. Say can be separated. I have given a very accurate figure of this historical specimen, and a detaited enlargement of one of the septa for comparison with the eastern forms. There is, however, one general feature of the western forms in which they differ entirely from any and all 278 PALEONTOLOGY OF NEW JERSEY. the New Jersey specimens which I have studied: this is the greater later- ally compressed form of the tube. In this respect they vary greatly, even the ovate specimens, from New Jersey, being much thicker than the west- ern ones; but as far as the ovate and oval form of the section is concerned, the same variations occur among the specimens from both regions, and apparently of about equal numbers, only the New Jersey specimens are never so large as many of the western ones, and are always proportionally thicker, unless accidentally compressed. In the details of the branching of the sutures the western specimens become far more complicated than those on the Atlantic coast, in proportion to the size of the specimens, although the general plan of the divisions, or what might be called the primary divisions of the lobes and sinuses, are very much the same in all the specimens examined. In many of the western ones the secondary lobes between the large lobes are proportionly longer and have many more serrations on their margins, and in one small individual the ventral sinus, as formed by the two halves combined, has almost exactly the same form and length as those on the sides of the shell. Even on Baculites grandis Hall and Meek, the general features of the sutures are the same, where, as in one example examined, the width of the specimen is fully 5 inches. Considering all these features and close resemblances between the eastern and western specimens I am much inclined to draw the line between the two species, as recognized by Mr. Say and Dr. Morton, considering it as a geographical limit more than as a difference in features, although there is that difference in size and relative thickness of the specimens, and to consider the western forms as properly belonging to B. compressus, and the New Jersey specimens as properly belonging to B. ovatus, irrespective of the form of their section, although it is quite difficult to find one equally rounded on the two margins among those from New Jersey. BACULITES ASPER. Plate xLvi, Figs. 10, 11. Baculites asper Morton: Synopsis, p. 43, Pl. 1, Figs. 12, 13, and Pl. x1u, Fig. 2. This species of Dr. Morton does not appear to have been noticed by writers among the fossils of New Jersey, but it nevertheless seems to have CEPHALOPODA OF THE CRETACEOUS MARLS. 279 existed within the limits of the State, as a single fragment of a large sized individual comes to *'me among the collections made by’ Prof. Reiley from Holmdel, and is from the Lower Marls. The fragment is less than 2 inches in length, but is about 24 inches in its greatest transverse diameter, by nearly 14 inches in its shorter diameter. The fragment is apparently from within the septate portion of the shell, as it bears markings of the septa at each extremity, but in a condition altogether too imperfect for description. However, there is on each side of it a single one of the large inflated node-like undulations which characterize the species, through the highest part of which the shorter diameter of the specimen is nearly one-half greater than at a point below between this and the next node below. There have probably been other septa within the length of the fragment, but they are entirely invisible in detail from the condition of preservation, although one of them appears to be obscurely indicated by” an irregular thickened line near the middle of the length, the undula- tions on the side of the shell extending entirely across its width and modifying one of the edges. In crossing the side of the specimen it forms a deep downward curve in the middle, with corresponding deep but: still broader depressions above and below it. The transverse section of the tube appears to have been nearly or quite symmetrically oval. It is possible I may be mistaken in the specific relations of this frag- ment; if it is not B. asper it must be an undescribed species, as none other described possesses the features which this one presents. Collection at Rutgers College. 280 PALEONTOLOGY OF NEW JERSEY. Order DIBRANCHIATA. Genus BELEMNITELLA D’Orbigny. BELEMNITELLA AMERICANA. Plate xLvi1, Figs. 1-11. Belemnites Americanus Morton: Jour Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila., 1st ser., vol. 6, p. 190, Pl. vim, Figs. 1-3, and Pl. v, Fig. 7; Am. Jour. Sci., vol. 18, 1st ser., p. 249, Pl. 1, Figs. 1-3; vol. 17, p. 281; Synopsis, p. 34, Pl. 1, Figs. 1-3. Belemnites subconicus (Lam.) Morton: Jour. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila., vol. v1, pp. 91 and 100, Pl. v, Fig. 7. Belemnitella mucronata (Schlot.) D’Orb.: Prod. Paléont., tome 2, p. 211; Gabb, Synopsis, p. 22; Meek, Geol. Surv. N. J., 1868, p. 731. Belemnitella subfusiformis Morton : Synopsis, p. 34, Pl. 1, Fig. 3. 2 Belemnitella paxillosa Meek: Geol. Surv. N. J., 1868, p. 731. Stylet or guard rather large, solid and heavy, often becoming thick- ened with age so as to be proportionally much larger in diameter as com- pared with smaller individuals. Specimens varying from 3 to nearly 4 inches in length below the base of the slit, the larger ones evidently having alength of fully 6 inches from the lower extremity to the top of the internal cavity or conotheca. General form triangularly cylindrical in the upper part, becoming flattened on the ventral side in the lower part, with frequently a slight mucronate extremity, which when broken generally shows a slight central perforation, as do many of those which are destitute of this pointed extremity. In many old examples the extremity is solid as in the specimen Fig. 3, Plate xLvut, while in the largest individual which I have observed from New Jersey, Figs. 5, 6, and 7, there is yet a slight perforation. I have never seen the mucronate point exceeding one-sixth of an inch in length. The upper end of the stylet or guard, from about the base of the internal cavity, gradually expands upward and becomes very thin on the edge, and the inner surface of the wall often bears the marks of the transverse septa of the phragmocone. At about the base of the cavity the external diame- ter is less than below, and in some examples the lower portion is consider- ably expanded as in the one represented by Figs. 1 and 2, Plate xivu, which is the typical specimen of Dr. Morton’s var. a, B. subfusiformis, while in others there is almost a reeular decrease downward to near the extremity, which is usually obtusely rounded except for the mucronate point occasion- CEPHALOPODA OF THE CRETACEOUS MARLS. 281 ally seen. Very young specimens often present a long slender extremity. On the ventral side, the slit extends fully one-third of the length of the shell, where the walls of the upper portion are preserved to near their full length, which is seldom the case; its width in the lower half often being little more than the thickness of heavy writing paper. The flattening of this side of the stylet commences near the base of the slit and extends almost to the lower extremity of the guard. On the dorsal side there is a raised elongate lanceolate area, which is narrow and prominently angular in the upper part of the body, but is flattened or simply depressed convex on the surface and gradually widens below the base of the slit so as to become from half the entire width of the shell to almost its equal in width, but produces a slight angularity on this side throughout the entire length. The entire surface is usually much roughened when not worn, the roughening being greatest on the ventral side, while laterally this roughening produces yaseular lines running obliquely backward in crossing from the ventral to the dorsal surfaces, and on the raised lanceolate area of the dorsal surface the markings are finer and arranged so as to produce longitudinal lines, or interrupted strize. I have not, in any of the New Jersey specimens, no matter how well preserved, been able to see anything of the rostrum or dorsal extension of the upper portion. The phragmocone is seldom seen showing the lines of septa, and when seen they appear to be only external or marginal. Among the few bearing the lines which I have examined none have shown the septa extending across. This body is rather abruptly obconical, and is just a little ovate in transverse section, one side being a very little angular and with a raised, rounded, longitudinal ridge, corresponding to the angularity of the solid side of the alveola of the stylet or guard, the side corresponding to the fissure of the guard being regularly curved, as is the inside of the cavity itself. The lines of septa are very numerous and closely arranged near the pointed end, but gradually and regularly increase in distance from each other, so that where the diameter of the cone reaches five-eighths of an inch, the septa are fully a twelfth of an inch apart. In their direction across the cone they are nearly straight, except on the angularity, where they are slightly advanced. The position of the siphuncle I have not observed. 282 PALEONTOLOGY OF NEW JERSEY. The substance of the guard is quite dense, and is transversely fibrous, the fibers being very slightly directed downward from the initial line, which is never quite central, but is usually placed considerably nearest to the fissured margin of the guard. It is almost useless to institute comparisons between this and other species except the B. mucronatus of Schlotheim; while it is equally difficult to point out reliable differences between that and the New Jersey form. There is, however, one marked difference between them, so far as I have been able to examine European specimens of 6. mucronatus, and there are many, both English and German. This is the relative length of the guard below the base of the slit or fissure, which in the American examples is proportionally longer than in the European, varying from half an inch to over an inch in different examples. This feature of course is a variable one, and perhaps may not be considered as of importance. or reliable, yet it nevertheless exists; but in other points they agree very closely. Still I am inclined to hold to Dr. Morton’s name for our American specimens, although forms like this, which may have been to some extent pelagic, are more apt to be inhabitants of widely separated continents than littoral species of molluses are. Formation and localities: I think this species is, so far as yet known, confined to the Lower Marl Beds. It is found at most of the outcrops of that bed throughout the State, and is abundant at many. Marlboro, Free- hold, Creamridge, Mullica Hill, and many other localities furnished them in great profusion, most of the examples showing evidence of having been water-rolled and worn before being imbedded, and consequently are always more or less broken and imperfect at the upper margin. The specimen of medium size figured is from the collection Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. Those represented by Figs. 8 and 9 are in the Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., and the others are from Rutgers College collection. BELEMNITES ? AMBIGUUS. Belemnites 2 ambiguus Morton: Synopsis, p. 35, Pl. 1, Figs. 4, 5. T have not been able to find Dr. Morton’s type specimen of this species, which he describes as “straight, elongated, quadrangular, striated longitu- dinally; front convex; back flat; sides slightly depressed by a longitudinal CEPHALOPODA OF THE CRELACKOUS MARLS. 283 eroove; apex obtuse, obscurely stellated; color yellowish white, opaque; substance, radiated carbonate of lime.” Dr. Morton gives as the length of his specimen 2 inches, with a breadth of one-sixth of an inch. There is much doubt as to the true nature of the specimen from which Dr. Morton drew the above description, but as the specimen itself is lost no very satisfactory determination can be arrived at. The specimens to which Dr. Morton refers as “the numerous individuals in the collection of the Academy” are mostly before me, and there would seem to be but little doubt of their being stems of an Eucrinite, although they do not have the characteristic fracture of those bodies, nor yet appear to be made up of easily separated rings, or to have the central perforation. The surface, as Dr. Morton says, is longitudinally striated, and when well preserved has a smooth glistening appearance under a hand glass, as if it had been polished, but when weathered shows obscure transverse lines as if there were trans- verse plates. The freshly broken end has a pearly radiating structure, en- tirely different from the usual divisional planes of crinoid stems, which fact offers an additional objection to their encrinal nature. The fragments have a more or less general quadrangular structure, but when closely examined all present an indistinct or obscurely pantangular feature. Dr. Morton states, in his observations, that his original specimen preserved the rounded lower extremity, but that none of the other specimens did, and those before me are all squarely truncate at each end. It is possible they may be the remains of some aleyonarian body as yet unknown. They are all from the Middle Marl Beds, and probably all from Timber Creek, New Jersey, the locality from which Dr. Morton cites his example. SHO Da NV CEPHALOPODA OF THE EOCENE MARLS OF NEW JERSEY. In Mr. F. B. Meek’s “Catalogue of Eocene Shells and Fish from Shark River,” published in the appendix to the Geological Report of New Jersey for 1868, on p. 731, et seq., he enumerates three species of Cephalopods: Aturia Vanuxemi and two species of Cimomia, C. Burtini Nyst’s sp. and C. Lamarcki Deshayes sp., both originally published under the genus Nauti- lus. Among all the fossils which I have examined from the Eocene layers of New Jersey I have seen evidence of only two species of Cephalopoda, namely, Atwia Vanuxemi and that herein described as Nautilus Cookana. No specimen or fragment which I have seen would appear to correspond to or possess the features of the genus Cimomia as given by Mr. Conrad, which are as follows: ‘“Nautiloid; septa sinuous, doubly waved, or sigmoid, num- erous; siphon small, central.” Nautilus Burtini Galeotti is given as the type. The two species above mentioned, N. Burtini and N. Lamarcki, are usually considered as synonyms of each other, but Deshayes assures us they are very distinct. Mr. Meek appears to have identified or recognized both forms, but upon what authority he does not say. The nautiloid forms which I have seen have only the straight, or nearly straight, septal les crossing the cast, and certainly could not have given rise to the mistake had they been examined. So it is possible Mr. Meek may have seen some form that has never come under my observation. The specimens of the following species, to which I have given a new name, certainly do not possess any of the features of Mr. Conrad’s genus, and I can find no deserip- 284 CEPHALOPODA OF THE EOCENE MARLS. 285 tion given of it elsewhere, and the form is certainly distinct from those of the Cretaceous beds below. NAUTILUS COOKANA, n. sp. Plate xLvim, Fig. 1, and Pl. xuirx, Figs. 4-5. Shell large, often reaching ~early a foot in its greatest diameter and proportionally wide and ventricose. Volutions rapidly expanding and prob- ably only three or four in number, rounded on the back and when retain- ing their normal form are but slightly more compressed on the sides. Axis perforate, the umbilicus only of moderate width but very deep, owing to the greater additional breadth of the outer volution at the axis than the pre- ceding one; margins of the umbilicus abruptly rounded. Septa distant, only moderately concave and regularly curved ina dorso-ventral direction, but much more flattened laterally; the ventral margin, surrounding the pre- ceding volution, somewhat raised. The lines indicating the septa on the casts are only slightly recurved on the sides and are but little directed forward on the dorsum; not more so than is called for by the difference in the two diameters of the volution. Siphon moderately large, almost cen- trally situated, being slightly nearer the ventral margin in the best pre- served examples examined. Shell unknown, the species known only from internal casts. This species is not uncommon in the stony layer at the top of the Upper Marls at Farmingdale, Deal, Squankum, and Shark River, New Jersey, and so far as can be seen or determined by the casts alone is a true Nautilus. Mr. G. B. Meek, in his list of the fossils of the Shark River Marls given in Geol. N. J. for 1868, includes Nautilus Burtini Got. and N. Lamarcki Desh. as oceurring in these beds, and places them both under Conrad’s genus Cymomia, which was founded upon the first of these two species. It is possible that a species possessing the features of that genus may occur in New Jersey; but among those which I have seen none show the double sinuate septa of N. Burtini as described by Mr. Conrad, therefore I am inclined to doubt their existence in the State. Most European authors agree in considering N. Burtini and N. Lamarcki as synonyms, but Deshayes points out differences, and Milne Edwards gives 286 PALEONTOLOGY OF NEW JERSEY. them as distinct. Mr. Meek appears to have not only considered them as distinct, but to have had Mr. Conrad’s authority for the statement, and for their occurrence at Shark River. Formation and locality: In the upper layers of the Upper Green Marls, at Shark River, and Squankum, New Jersey. Collection at Rutgers College. | ’ y g 8 Fig. 2.— Nautilus Cookana.—One-halt natural size, CEPHALOPODA OF THE EOCENE MARLS. 287 Genus ATURIA Bronn. ATURIA VANUXEMI. Plate xLIx, Figs. 1, 3, and Plate L, Fig. 1. Pelaqus Vanuxemi Conrad: Jour. Acad. Nat. Sci., vol. 1, 2d ser., p. 130, Pl. xrv, Fig. 15. Aturia Vanuxemi Conrad: Am. Jour. Conch., vol. 2, p. 15. Aturia ziczac (Sow.) Conrad: Am. Jour. Conch., vol. 1, p. 150; Smithsonian Check List, p. 19. Nautilus angustatus Con.: Am. Jour. Conch., vol. 1, p. 150; not N. angustatus Conrad, U. 8. Expl. Exp. Geology, p. 728, Pl. xx, Figs. 5, 6. Shell of moderately large size, the most perfect one which I have seen, but which is an internal cast only, measures 64 inches in its longest diame- ter, and has a thickness from side to side of about 2 inches, but has appar- ently been considerably compressed in this direction. The form is closely convolute with a closed umbilicus; sides depressed, convex, and dorsum narrowly rounded. The inner volution projects into the aperture of the outer one about two-fifths of the distance from the umbilicus to the outer margin, leaving the aperture, in this laterally compressed specimen, some- what elongately halbert shaped. The septa are somewhat closely arranged and number about sixteen in the last coil of the shell. In rising from the umbilical depression they make a broad forward curve or arch, which extends to a little beyond the middle of the width of the volution, from which point they are bent abruptly backward, and form a proportionally long, narrow, and somewhat pointed spur, the outer edge of which is straighter than the inner and with that of those in the rear and in advance form a nearly straight and continuous line parallel to the margin of the dorsum. After this edge of the spur reaches a point about opposite the place of abrupt flexure of the inner side, the line runs straight across the back of the volution, forming a broad projecting lip on the back of the shell equal in length to that of the spur on the side of the volution. The spur on the side, rather outside of the middle of the volution, with the point reaching almost to the corner of the outer lip of the septum below, is a rather well marked feature and somewhat characteristic. Septa deeply con- cave, as seen in an apertural view. Siphon large, situated fully its own 288 PALEONTOLOGY OF NEW JERSEY. diameter from the ventral margin, as seen in the aperture of the large speci- men, but in a second smaller one is close against the back of the next inner volution. The septa bend downward to the siphon around it, forming a deep funnel-like depression, and unite with the tube about opposite the line of the sides of the next septum below, the sides of the siphonal tube con- tinuing in a direct line from septum to septum. Surface of the shell un- known, the examples all being internal casts only. I think there can be no question regarding the relations of this shell to the genus Aturia, as defined and understood by Bronn. It certainly is not congeneric with Pelagus Montfort, as typified in the figure given with the original description, as in that one the septa make not less than three of the abrupt flexures, and are much more like some of the Devonian forms of Goniatites than like Atwria. The peculiarity shown in the siphon of Aturia is apparently quite characteristic, and when seen, which is quite common in the New Jersey casts, can not be well mistaken. The entire central portion of the septum is gradually bent downward and forms a broad open funnel as seen when looking into the upper side of the septum, but rapidly decreases in size without angle, and passes within that of the septum below; in this respect being entirely different from Nautilus and all the allied genera. Formation and locality: In the Eocene Green Marls at Shark River, Farmingdale, near Squankum, and near Long Branch, New Jersey. The examples figured are from Shark River, New Jersey, and belong to the col- lections at Rutgers College. Suc rloONn VEL. CLASSIFIED LISTS. Classified list of the Gasteropoda of the New Jersey Cretaceous Marls. | Lower| Middle | Base of marls. | marls, | "PP&T marls. Class GASTEROPODA. Subclass PROSOBRANCHIATA. Order PECTINIBRANCHIATA. Family MURICID : Genus Pudicla planimarpinata Wn secsceeicew voce ew cece scer cscs cans peal | se rears [eee rn Pyropsis : (Rapa?) corrina W. ...-...----- .-- 2. eee n ne eee ene conn ne -- eee oe Pesach jpesecene ClO VAUNG one ease escclcccccs ne cmecccvessiassse= 5. SS bSeqnceal|eccasscc MAO GET Gcecks SOneS DOORS CODES a SoS e a ECoe Stee: SOP A ASeeh es ews pet ODENM Wetec es come eeere vcccesinw nant cones caer seals nl Sao has bocce octolirata Con......... BOOSIE L OIRO ESE HOCH Coe SES Mo | Beene lescsece- perlata Conmen soos sae eames ces a -- eee ee n= eee sd ERA Aa | oe ReueyieWeee se naa cee oaeneee aa ce aaccisseneee es eaoe SGP) Sateen laeecwnen PEE he cco ema aSACOCO 0 SaiE Ba ROU OED eREOCOne $4 lS onoeaeg] Seas eeS Richardson nome y essa ements oe es tales em eee ane We 6 Wosecaepal[soseesoe (Rayan) eeptemlinata Goaset seen ccreccss nae sos caee cele ones 5 al Ae Ret See e BELVOLVIE Oren eae tamem niet neia amis eeerons setae eee ah TN isssee ese AME DG STON Oe eos nema po cecudicnc cceosececeeser So | |eAboodss aise sas PaO En UA OEY Bion S062 pono) HOQOS DS OOCU REE ECID DCCOGOESED EEE EO {ac al) ON i ees ee Pyrifusus erraticus W.. ...--..----- ODO Aa Sone SSaEC BaocegReE a5 Me WS Ss.5554| Seed Bee CHER VY 6 edeagsosssaca ncoSds ongecs ansace Soeeee eee ses | X [ewes ee--|-------- Mstoranianaianyie ee ees canoe: seman Amarante cee ete me Be issen eee Seas MeaiihWaeeceet css eee a cece ue she sce bec seed Jt 3“ lesaeeeee Baeapee Mnliienennignge aca peccseensnidemc serine - == eee eee aoe eee Y GEERT bol ieee cots ?| Diploconcha cretacéa Con ~~ <6 =~ == >. E>, SON a> GP Se a4 x Base of upper marls. 294 PALEONTOLOGY OF NEW JERSEY. Classified list of the Cephalopoda of the New Jersey Cretaceous Marls. \Lower| Middle | Base of marls,} marls. oe Class CEPHALOPODA. Order TETRABRANCHIATA. Family NAUTILID& : Genus Nautilus : BryanivG 2 - asc asee 2 ee ean anes co cenn) sem a(em onto ieene | ------ oe) URS cane Dekayu Mortis o-. eee) oe eee a elena ea | x x somoco Hercoglossa paucifex Cope...... ..----------- sSubodeaceodees cosisse Poorer | homes au yee. Family AMMONITID: Genus Ammonites complexus Meek...--. ..----------------+----+-------- | “XS jocehaks Bates a Delawarensis) Morton esse e esa aoe see ee XM) Wessaices | aoa dentato-carinatus Roemer....-..----------------------- Pe oir eile ene Vanoxeml Merton 2 -s-s- === eee area ae =a le Selll | ier eae Am. (Placenticeras) placenta De Kay dc alte Sh DeNARDI Una am ann [De ae tilifer Mortonss.cs2 252 Js-e5- te ses ean eee Wes eate see Va Mcke Am. (Sphenodiscus) lenticularis Owen ...--. -----.--------------- eee Me i) Boese Scaphites hippocrepis De Kay...-. ..-----.----------------#-.----- M, |bsceese al eeeeeeee Pals C0) eas aeesco csease PESOS d ees gaan cnaSs So sesa Scosse x 1, See | ais caeaeed MOCOSUS OWEN. <2. 5. 5-50 $se5 oes ackiosselenoeeateneaees Scat ee eee | ie TENMOUMis Orton. 7 =sse eae ene ences seed S07. |lowkteant-|| ees Tons) Wait ooo cane cececo Fesccs no SHS Sone noes ysces: | XK ese eeee[eeee eee Turrilites pauper.W bitf: = \o<2. s2= soe 5 ot oa-- sae ee Stee ee [te Sea ee eee Heteroceras Contadw Morton = 2 emer e == a ne ete ee eee | ee sae : Ptychoceras (Solenoceras) annulifer Morton... ..-..----------------- SO | SiS tel eee Baculites asper Morton ...--. BE Bae RES CREO CROs DEO OSE Bo RSceHCaSS ee ee COMPLessus MOLtON ses. (--e esas ae eee eee eee ae |) Oe |beeeease| eens ovatus Morton.-... ..-. Be ECOS EEOC SHAE RRM OSC OOS SaeoaS SoeaS ex a oes Order DIBRANCHIATA. Family BELEMNITID#: Genus Belemnitella Americana Morton. .-.. ---. ------------------- coke Sec | Sn aera ioe Total Cephalopoda. 222-22 ss-a-+ 2s se/ec estas eons oe lees ane eee ee eee | 19 | 5 | 295 Classified list of the Gasteropoda of the New Jersey Eocene Marls. Class GASTEROPODA. Subclass PROSOBRANCHIATA. Order PECTINIBRANCHIATA. Family MuRIcID&. Murex (Pteronotus?) varicosus W. Rhinocantha? Conradi W. TRITONID. Triton Eocenense W. PURPURID®. Pseudoliva vetusta ? Con. Fusip &. Fusus angularis W. leva- | paucicostatus W. pluricostatus W. perobesus W. ( Neptimea ? eocenicus W. hector W. var multilinea- tus W. staminea Con. ( Urosalpinge?)multicostatus W Clavella raphanoides Con. FASCIOLARIUID 2. Fasciolaria Hercules W. propinqua W. Samsoni W. TURBINELLID&. Caricella ponderosa W, pyruloides Con. VOLUTID®. Voluta lelia W. parvula W. perelevata W. scaphoides W. (Scaphella) Neweombi- ana W. ( dmoria) vesta W. Volutilithes cancellata W. Sayana Con. CANCELLARIIDA, Cancellaria rudis W. PLEUROTOMID®. Pleurotoma (Surcula?) spira W. regularicos tata W. surculitiformis Ww. alti- | Class GASTEROPODA—Continued. Subclass PROSOBRANCHIATA— Cont'd. Order PECTINIBRANCHIATA—Continned. Family PLevkoromip.2z—Continued. Surcula perobesa W. Surculites annosus Con. cadaverosus W. ecurtus W. CoNnID&. Conus subsauridens Con. STROMBID®. Calyptraphorus velatus C CYPRXID®. Cyprea sabuloviridis W. CassIDID.&. Cassidaria carinata Lam. DoLup®. Ficus penitus Con. NATICID”&. Natica globulella W. ONUSTID&. Xenophora lapifereus W. SOLARIID&. Architectonica annosa Con. SCALARIIDA. Scalaria tennilirata W. TURRITELLID®. Mes.lia elongata W. Order SCUTIBRANCHIATA. Suborder PODOPHTHALMA, Family PLEUROTOMARIIDZ. ¢ Teptomaria gigantea W. pergranulosa W. perlata Con. Trematofusus yvenustus W. Subclass OPISTHOBRANCHIATA. Order TECTIBRANCHIATA. Family TORNATELLID&®. Actwon prisca Con, Tornatellewa lata Con. Tornatina Wetherilli Lea. Class CEPHALOPODA. Order TETRABRANCHIATA. Family NAUTILID.©. Nautilus Cookana W. Aturia Vanuxemi Con. |Pollno suid tal es PLATS I. EXPLANATION OF PLATE I.) TUDICLA PLANIMARGINATA Whitf. (p. 33). Fies. 1-3. Back lateral and summit views of the type specimen. PYROPSIS TROCHIFORMIS Tuomey (p. 41). 5. Opposite views of two casts showing rounded volutions. 6. View of a specimen in loose marl showing exterior markings. 7. A small cast showing strong lirations. The two first specimens are from the collections Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. PYROPSIS PERLATA Conrad. (p. 37). 8-10. Three views of a large cast referred to this species. PYROPSIS ELEVATA Gabb (p. 35). 11-13. Three views of the type specimen, Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. PYROPSIS RICHARDSONI Tuomey (p. 39). 14-16. Three views of a cast which appears to be characteristic of the species. 1 Where not otherwise mentioned, the originals of figures may be considered as belonging to the collection at Rutgers College, New Brunswick, or in the State collection at Trenton, New Jersey. 300 U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY is MONOGRAPH XVII PLATE! MURICIDAZ OF THE LOWER BED GREENSAND MARLS oe (er Be TT. 11, 12. 13, 14. 15, 16. 17. 18, 19. 20. 302 EXPLANATION OF PLATE II. PYROPSIS RETIFER Gabb (p. 38). . Opposite views of a specimen of typical form. . Two views of a larger specimen less like the type, and witb fainter markings. P)\ROPSIS NATICOIDES Whitf (p. 43). PYROPSIS OCTOLI! ATA Conrad (p. 36). . Two views of a large cast of typical form. . View of another individual showing the extension of the anterior beak. PYROPSIS REILEYI Whitf (p. 42). Two views of a small cast from Holmdel, New Jersey, from white clays. Two views of a cast showing faint spiral lines, and also the columellar pits. Two views of another cast which is entirely smooth. . Three views of the type, showing the Naticoid form. Collection Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. View of the aperture of a specimen which retains a part of the shell and shows the markings. Two views of a cast from an ironstone nodule where the anterior beak is preserved. Impression taken in the matrix of the same specimen showing surface features, Key Port, New Jersey. Near U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY RAPH XVIIl PLATE II MURICIDA OF THE LOWER BED GREENSAND MARLS, PLATE III. EXPLANATION OF PLATE III. PyROPSIS (Rapa?) CORRINA Whitf. (p. 45). Fics. 1-3. Three views of a specimen showing the strong columellar fold in Fig. 1. PyYRoPSIS (RAPA?) SEPTEMLIRATA Gabb (p. 44). 4, A copy of Mr. Gabb’s figure. 5,6. Two figures of a specimen showing lirations and the columellar fold. From Mullica Hill, New Jersey. 7,8. Views of a large distorted cast showing strong lirations and evidence of transverse costie. Acad, Nat. Sci., Phila. PERISSOLAX DUBIA Gabb (p. 47). 9. View of a large specimen from Professor Reiley’s collection. Holmdel, New Jersey. 10,11. Two views of Mr. Gabb’s type specimen. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. Pyropsis? oBEsA Whitf. (p. 40). 12,13. Two figures of the type specimen, Fig. 12 showing the columellar folds. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., New York City. TURBINELLA? VERTICALIS Whitf. (p. 82). 14,15. Opposite views of the type specimen. ERIPACHYS ? PALUDINAFORMIS Whitf. (p. 77). 16,17. Two views of the specimen described. 304 U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MONOGRAPH XvVill PLATE til MURICIDAE OF THE LOWER BED GREENSAND MARLS. PELATe. LV. EXPLANATION OF PLATE IV. PYRIFUSUS SUBDENSATUS Conrad (p. 48). 1-3. Front, back, and summit views of Conrad’s type of the genus. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. PyrIFUSUS ERRATICUS Whitf. (p. 50). 4. View of the shell as obtained by gutta-percha from the matrix. 5, An enlargement of the surface striw. Columbia College. Pyrirusus MEEKI Whitf. (p. 55). 6. View of an imperfect cast from Crosswicks Creek. Columbia College. 7,8. Views of a more perfect cast from the same locality. State collection. PYRIFUSUS CUNEUS Whiftf. (p. 51). 9. View of a small cast from the collection Acad, Nat. Sci., Phila. 10,11. Two views of a larger cast from Freehold, New Jersey. PYRIFUSUS PYRULOIDES Gabb (p. 53). 12,13. Two views of the type specimen. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. Pyrirusus McFarLanpi Whitf. (p. 52). 14,15. Two views of the type. Mullica Hill, New Jersey. Pyrirusus MULLICAENSIS Gabb (p.52). 16,17. Two views of the smaller cast, from Freehold, New Jersey. 18,19. Similar views of a larger cast, from Mullica Hill, New Jersey. NEPTUNELLA MULLICAENSIS Whitf. (p. 56). 20,21. Two views of aspecimen from Mullica Hill, New Jersey. Collection Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. 306 she 10, 11. 12, 13. 14, 15. 16, 17. 18-21. 22, 23. 24, 20. 308 EXPLANATION OF PLATE V. PYRIFUSUS TURRITUS Whitf. (p. 54). . Two views of an imperfect cast from Middletown, New Jersey. . View of a cast from Burlington, New Jersey. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. . Two views of a more perfect cast from Crosswicks Creek, New Jersey. Phila, TRITON (EPIDROMUS) PRACKDENS Whitf. (p. 58). . Two views of the specimen described. TRACHYTRITON ATLANTICUM Whitf. (p. 59). Front and back views of a very perfect cast, showing the varices. Views of two other casts, differing in size. TRACHYTRITON MULTIVARICOSUM Whitf. (p. 61). Views of two imperfect casts showing spiral lines. Two views of a specimen showing varices, but not the spiral lines. TRACHYTRITON ? HOLMDELENSE Whitf. (p. 60). Two views of the specimen described, doubtfully a Trachytriton. ODONTOFUSUS MEDIANS Whitf. (p. 67). Acad. Nat. Sci., Opposite views of each of two individuals of this species showing variation in form. SERRIFUSUS (LIROFUSUS) NODOCARINATUS Whitf. (p. 64). Two views of the cast showing the features described. SERRIFUSUS CROSSWICKENSIS Whitf. (p. 63). Opposite views of the cast showing the features described. U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MONOGRAPH XVIIl PLATE V MURICID4 AND FASCIOLARIIDA OF THE LOWER GREENSAND MARLS. 6,7. 8,9. 10,11. 12-14. 15, 16. 17, 18. 19, 20. 310 EXPLANATION OF PLATE VI. ODONTOFUSUS TYPICUS Whitf. (p. 66). . Views of casts, more or less imperfect, from Crosswicks Creek, New Jersey. . View of a cast from Cream Ridge, New Jersey, showing the extent of the beak. ODONTOFUSUS ROSTELLAROIDES Whitf. (p. 68). Two views of the most perfect cast seen. ODONTOFUSUS SLACKI Gabb’s sp. (p. 66). Opposite views of the type. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. Fusus HoLMDELENSIS Whitf. (p. 62). Views of opposite sides of the only specimen seen, VOLUTOMORPHA (PIESTOCHILUS) MUCRONATA Gabb (p. 75). Opposite sides of a large specimen from Freehold, New Jersey, and front view of a smaller one from Crosswicks, New Jersey, the latter from the collection at Columbia College. VOLUTOMORPHA (PIESTOCHILUS) BELLA Gabb. (p. 74). Two views of a medium sized cast. Similar views of a large cast, probably the type. All from collection Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. VOLUTOMORPHA (PIESTOCHILUS) KANEI Gabb. (p. 76). Two views of the type specimen. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila VOLUTOMORPHA CONRADI Gabb. (p. 71). . Front view of the type specimen. For other figures of this and other specimens see Pl. vir. U,. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MONOGRAPH XVill PLATE Vi / RES, ae ; gee: a jc 13 FUSIDAZZ AND FASCIOLARIIDZ OF THE LOWER GREENSAND MARLS \ (st vy mi = 71 ve i she i ; PLATE VIL. EXPLANATION OF PLATE VII. VOLUTOMORPHA CONRADI Gabb. (p.71). Fis. 1. View of the type of the species. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. See also Pl. vi. 2,3. Profile and back view of a larger cast from Mr. M. E. Schenck’s pits, New Jersey. 4,5. Two views of a cast showing imprints of surface AATEIUES) 2 referred doubttully to this species. Acad. Nat, Sci., Phila. VoLuTOMORPHA GaBBI Whitf. (p.73). 6. View of a cast showing surface features, but showing the different form of volution from that of V. Conradi. Holmdel, New Jersey. 312 U. 8. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MONOGRAPH XViil PLATE Vil FASCIOLARIID© OF THE LOWER GREENSAND MARLS. iv EXPLANATION OF PLATE VIII. VoLUTOMORPHA GABBI Whitf. (p. 73). FIGs. 1. View of a small specimen from Holmdel, New Jersey. 2,3. View of a cast from Mullica Hill, New Jersey. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. 4. View of a cast of the species ? from Marlboro, New Jersey. VOLUTOMORPHA PONDEROSA Whitf. (p. 72). 5,6. Two views of an imperfect cast from Neversink, New Jorsey. 314 U. S, GEOLOGICAL SURVEY wey MONOGRAFH XVII PLATE Vill FASCIOLARIIDAZ. OF THE LOWER GREENSAND MARLS. Jpolby Ge Wp se. 11, 12. 13, 14. 316 EXPLANATION OF PLATE IX. TRITONIDEA OBESA Whitf. (p. 79). . Views from two different individuals of the species. TURBINELLA ? PARVA Gabb. (p. 80). . Summit view, natural size, of the type specimen. . Back and front views of the same enlarged. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. TURBINELLA ? SUBCONICA Gabb. (p.81). . Two views of the typespecimen. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. VASUM CONOIDES Whitf. (p. 83). . Two views of the specimen ; one natural size, the other enlarged. EUTHRIA (?) FRAGILIS Whitf. (p. 78). Two views of the specimen used, one natural size and one enlarged. VOLUTOMORPHA PONDEROSA Whitf. (p.72). Two views of a large specimen from Holmdel, New Jersey. U, S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MONOGRAPH XVIi|_ PLATE IX FASCIOLARIIDZ, TRITONIDZ, AND TURBINELLIDA OF THE LOWER GREENSAND MARLS. [Sibyl Dee EXPLANATION OF PLATE X. VOLUTODERMA BIPLICATA Gabb (p. 90). Figs. 1-2. Opposite views of the type specimen from the Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. VOLUTODERMA OVATA Whitf. (p. 91). 3,4. Opposite views of the specimen showing the plications and abrupt shoulder of the volu- tions. Collection of the Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., New York City. VoLuTa ? DELAWARENSIS Gabb (p. 84). 5. Back view of the smaller cast used by Mr. Gabb. 6,7. Two views of the larger cast, both types and from the Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila, 318 MONOGRAPH XvViil PLATE X U. 5. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 5 VOLUTIDAZ OF THE LOWER GREENSAND MARLS. Gi sere eXeT. roe Figs. 1,2. 3,4. 320 EXPLANATION OF PLATE XI. ROSTELLITES NASUTUS Gabb (p. 86). Two views of Mr. Gabb’s type from the collection of the Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. ROSTELLITES ANGULATUS Whitf. (p. 88). Two views of a cast showing the flattening of the body volution. Acad. Nat. Sci.,Phila. ROSTELLITES TEXTURATUS Whitf. (p. 88). . Views of two individuals, one from Holmdel, the other from Freehold, New Jersey, showing difference in surface markings. TURRICULA LEDA Whitf. (p. 93). . View of the cast used in description. TURRICULA REILEYI Whitf. (p. 92). . View of cast described, showing the impression of the extension of the spire above, TURRICULA SCALARIFORMIS Whitf. (p. 95). . The cast representing the two sets of surface markings, PLATE XI MONOGRAPH XVIII U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY coe van ’ =n Ree)” VOLUTID4 AND MITRIDZ OF THE LOWER GREENSAND MARLS. 7-9. 17, 18. 322 EXPLANATION OF PLATE XII. TURBINOPSIS PLICATA whiff. (p. 104). . Two views of a specimen showing the features of the species. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. TURBINOPSIS CURTA Whitf. (p. 102). . Two views of a small cast showing the short spire. . Views of a larger specimen. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. TuRBINOPSIS HitGarp1 Conrad. ? (p. 100). Views of three imperfect casts referred to this species. TURBINOPSIS ELEVATA Whitf. (p. 102). . Two views of an imperfect cast. . An imperfect cast showing the isolated spots on the columella. . Views of a more slender cast. All from the Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. TURBINOPSIS MAJOR Whitf. (p. 103). . Two views of a small specimen. . Three views of a large cast. TURBINOPSIS ANGULATA Whitf. (p. 101). Two views of a cast showing the specific features. MOREA NATICELLA Gabb (p. 97). . Two views of the type specimen. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. CANCELLARIA (MERICA) SUBALTA Conrad (p. 95), . View of the shell somewhat restored. . Enlargement from the columellar lip. Acad, Nat, Sci., Phila. U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MONOGRAPH XvVill PLATE XII CANCELLARIIDZ OF THE LOWER GREENSAND MARLS. PA re Le, FIGs. uF 9, 10. . View of a second cast. 12513: 14, 15. 16,17. 18, 19. 20, 21. 22, 23. 24, 25. 324 EXPLANATION OF PLATE XIII. SURCULA STRIGOSA Gabb (p. 105). View of the fragment supposed to be the type. CiITHARA MULLICAENSIS Whitf. (p. 106). 3. Front views, one natural size and one enlarged, of a specimen retaining the shell. . Two views of a cast. . View of a larger cast from the same locality. CITHARA CROSSWICKENSIS Whitf. (p. 107). . Two views of the best cast yet found. ROSTELLARIA CURTA Whitf. (p. 109). Views of the opposite sides of a cast showing the features described. Two views of a specimen retaining fragments of shell. ROSTELLARIA FUSIFORMIS Whitf. (p. 110). Two views of the most perfect cast observed. ROSTELLARIA SPIRATA Whitf. (p. 109). Two views of a characteristic cast of the species. ROSTELLARIA COMPACTA Whitf. (p. 108). Views of a very compact cast showing a ridge on the front of Fig. 18. Views of a second cast which is less compact. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. ANCHURA (DRAPANOCHILUS) COMPRESSA Whitf. (p. 117). Two views of a large cast from Freehold, New Jersey. Views of a cast showing a shorter spire, From the collection of Columbia College. U. S, GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MONOGRAPH XVili PLATE Xil! PLEUROTOMIDA AND STROMBIDAZE OF THE LOWER GREENSAND MARLS. EXPLANATION OF PLATE XIV. ANCHURA ABRUPTA Conrad (p. 113). Fics. 1. View of a large imperfect cast of the form referred to this species. 2,3. Views of the opposite sides of a second cast, showing the carina on the back of the volu- tion. Am. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. ANCHURA ABRUPTA var. ACUTISPIRA Whitf. (p. 114). 4. View of the specimen described. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. ALARIA ROSTRATA Gabb (p. 119). : 5,6. Views of two different specimens, both showing the outer lip. Fig. 5 is from a Holmdel specimen ; Fig. 6 from Haddonfield, New Jersey, in the Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. ANCHURA PENNATA Morton (p. 115). 7,8. Views of two casts which show the outer lip. Both from Holmdel, New Jersey. ANCHURA SOLITARIA Whitf. (p. 117). 9. View of the single imperfect cast observed. ANCHURA ARENARIA Morton (p. 112). 10. View of Dr. Morton’s type specimen. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. RosTELLaRIA HEBE Whitf. (p. 111). 11-13. Three views of the best cast of the species observed. 14. View of another imperfect cast showing spiral lines. ANCHURA PAGODAFORMIS Whitf. (p. 116). 15,16. Views of the opposite sides of*the best cast of the species yet found. 326 U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MONOGRAPH XVIil_ PLATE XIV STROMBIDAZ OF THE LOWER GREENSAND MARLS. Peis x V-. EXPLANATION OF PLATE XV. Cypr=a (Aricia) Mortont Gabb (p. 120). Figs. 1-3. Three views of Mr. Gabb’s New Jersey type. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. Doxtum (DoLIopsiIs) MULTILIRATUM Whitf. (p. 121). 4,5. Two views of the specimen used, natural size. 6. Enlarged view of the same. FICUS PRECEDENS Whitf. (p. 122). 7,8. Two views, enlarged two diameters, of the most perfect cast observed. NaTICA ABYSSINA Morton (p. 122). 9,10. Two views, lateral and basal, of a cast from the white limestone nodules at Monimently New Jersey. ; 11,12. Two similar views of another cast from the Green Marls. GYRODES INFRACARINATA Gabb (p. 125). 13-15. Three views of a very characteristic cast from Highlands, New Jersey. 16. Basal view ofa large cast from Burlington, New Jersey. GYRODES Apnorti Gabb, (p. 124). 17. Summit view of the type specimen. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. 328 U. §. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Peep MONOGRAPH XVIIl PLATE XV CYPRAIDA, DOLIIDZ, AND NATICID4 OF THE LOWER GREENSAND MARLS. 1s Jive A Sb RGA Fies. 1-3. 9,11. 12. 13, 14. 15, 16. 17. 18. 19-21. 22, 23, 20. 24. 26. 330 EXPLANATION OF PLATE XVI. GYRODES PETROSA Morton (p. 127). Back, front, and summit views of a specimen from Mullica Hill. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., New York City, . Summit view of 2 cast from Crosswicks Creek. Columbia College. GYRODES CRENATA Conrad (p. 126). . Two views of the type specimen from the Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. GYRODES ALTISPIRA Gabb (p. 128). . Front and back views of a cast from Mullica Hill in the Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., New York City. GYRODES OBTUSIVOLYA Gabb (p. 129). Views of different specimens from Upper Freehold. View of another cast in the collection of the Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., New York City: from New Egypt, New Jersey. Lunatia Hawt Gabb. (p. 130). Two views of a specimen from Mullica Hill in the Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. Similar views of a cast from the same place in the Am. Mus, Nat. Hist., New York City. AMAUROPSIS PUNCTATA Gabb (p. 182). View of the type specimen. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. Enlargement of the surface. Views of different individuals showing but slight diversity in form. AMAUROPSIS MEEKANA Whitf. (p. 131). Views of different specimens showing a slight difference in form. Fig.22 enlarged to two diameters. Enlargement of the surface. AMAUROPSIS PALUDINEFORMIS H. M. (pp. 131, 132). Enlarged view of the type of this species for comparison, two diameters. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., New York City. U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MONOGRAPH XVIII PLATE XVI NATICIDZ OF THE LOWER GREENSAND MARLS. Figs. 332 EXPLANATION OF PLATE XVII. MARGARITA ABYSSINA Gabb (p. 133). . Lateral and basal views of a specimen from Burlington, New Jersey. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. New York City. . Enlargement to two diameters of the same. 5. Lateral and summit views of a cast from Crosswicks. MopvuLus LapPiposus Whitf. (p. 152). . Lateral, basal, and summit views of a very perfect cast. DELPHINULA LAPIDOSA Morton’s sp. (p. 152). . Enlarged lateral, summit, and basal views of Dr. Morton’s type, from Alabama. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. MARGARITELLA ABBOTTI Gabb (p. 134). . Summit and basal views of Mr. Gabb’s type. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. . Lateral and summit views of another cast. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. XENOPHORA LEPROSA Morton (p. 135). . Summit and basal views of a small cast. . Basal and lateral views of a large cast from Crosswicks, New Jersey. ENDOPTYGMA UMBILICATA Tuomey (p. 136). . Basal view of a small cast showing the groove left by the spiral tooth. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., New York City. The specimen is from Burlington, New Jersey. U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MONOGRAPH XVIi PLATE xvii TROCHIDA, ONUSTIDA, AND LITTORINIDAZ OF THE LOWER GREENSAND MARLS, yd shy FIG. ib 8,9. 10. 11. 12. 19, 20. 21, 22. 23, 24. 25. 26. 27, 28. 334 = EXPLANATION OF PLATE XVIII. ScALARIA (OPALIA) THOMASI Gabb? (p. 137). View of the only specimen of the species observed. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. SCALARIA SILLIMANI Morton (p. 138). . View of the specimen identified. ScALARIA? PAUPERATA Whitf. (p. 141). . Two views of a specimen retaining some of the shell. . Similar views of a complete cast. . Enlargement of surface from Fig. 3. TURRITELLA COMPACTA Whitf. (p. 142.) Two views of a cast of this species. TURRITELLA GRANULICOSTA Gabb (p. 144). View of the type specimen. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. Enlargement of the surface. ScALARIA? HERCULES Whitf. (p. 140). View of the specimen as obtained from a gutta-percha impression in the natural mold. Columbia College. TURRITELLA VERTEBROIDES, Morton (p. 146). . View of Morton’s type and an enlargement of the surface. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. . View of an impression in a natural mold from Monmouth, New Jersey. . View of a large cast in the collection at Columbia College. . View of a cast from Monmouth County, New Jersey. . An imperfect cast, Mr. Gabb’s second type of Laxispira lumbricalis, natural size. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. TURRITELLA ENCRINOIDES Morton (p. 143). View of Morton’s type and enlargement of surface. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. In the en- largement, the volution is represented as too round. View of two internal casts referred to this species from Upper Freehold, New Jersey. TURRITELLA LippINcoTTI Whitf. (p. 145). View of apartial cast from Crosswicks, New Jersey, and an imprint from the natural mold from Holmdel, New Jersey. LAXISPIRA LUMBRICALIS Gabb (p. 148). Copy of Mr. Gabb’s figure of the type of the genus and species. The second specimen is Fig. 18. See also explanation of Fig. 26. SILIQUARIA PAUPERATA Whitf. (p. 149). Enlarged view (two diameters) of a cast showing the slit. This specimen was included in Gabb’s types of Laxispira lumbricalis. Two views of another specimen found with the above. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MONOGRAPH XVIII PLATE XVIII SCALARIIDA, TURRITELLIDZ, AND VERMETIDA OF THE LOWER GREENSAND MARLS. f % * ] en i i "a < e 4! ¥ i Me | 7 A. +9 . @ Mere XX FIGs. ils 13. 14. 15, 16. 17, 18. 19, 20. 21, 22. 23-25. EXPLANATION OF PLATE XIX. OBELISCUS CONELLUS Whitf. (p. 151). View of the front side of the specimen described, greatly enlarged. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. LEIOSTRACA CRETACEA Conrad (p. 150). . Views of three specimens showing the features described, enlarged four, five, and three diameters respectively. . A still further enlargement of the aperture from another shell. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. HELCION ? TENTORIUM Morton (p. 153). . Lateral and vertical views of the type, enlarged. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. . Further enlargement of the marginal striz. ACTON CRETACEA Gabb (p. 158). . Two views of a cast which shows no spiral striw. . Two views of another cast showing spiral strie. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. ACTON GABBANA Whitf. (p. 156). Front view of one of Mr. Gabb’s types of A. biplicata. See Figs. 23-25. ACTON SUBOVOIDES Whitf. (p. 155). Front view of the specimen marked ‘ type of A. ovoides Gabb.” Two views of a second specimen. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. AcTZON ForsBestana Whitf. (p. 157). Two views of a cast of the species. Enlargements to two diameters of Fig. 17 and another specimen, showing the spiral lines. Two views of au individual from Mullica Hill. ACTON GABBANA Whitf. (p. 156). Further illustrations of this species to show the aperture, ete. GLOBICONCHA CURTA Gabb (p. 160). . Front and lateral views of a cast of this species from Bell County, Texas. CINULIA (OLIGOPLYCHIA) NATICOIDES Gabb (p. 161). . View of a specimen, natural size, from the collection at Columbia College. Monmouth County, New Jersey. . Enlargement of the front of the same. . View of another cast showing the cavity of the ridge. Crosswicks Creek, New Jersey. U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY EULIMIDA, PYRAMIDELLIDA, PATELLIDA, AND TORNATELLID@ OF THE LOWER GREENSAND MARLS. dee hh Oe EXPLANATION OF PLATE XX. AVELLANA BULLATA Morton (p. 163). Fics. 1,4. Views of two different specimens, apparently both used by Dr. Morton. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. CINULIA OVOIDEA Gabb (p. 162). 5,6. Two views of Mr. Gabb’s type specimen. BuLLA Morront Lyell & Forbes (p. 165). 7,8. Front and back views of a very large specimen from Crosswicks, in the Columbia College collection. 9. View of a smaller specimen. Collection Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. CYLICHNA RECTA Gabb (p. 164). 10,11. Two views of the type specimen enlarged two diameters. DENTALIUM (FALCULA) FALCATUM Conrad (p. 169). 12,14. View of small much curved specimen, all casts. 15-17. Views of the larger portion of three individual casts. 12. Portion of a partial cast. looking on the back and showing striw# of growth. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. DENTALIUM SUBARCUATUM Conrad (p. 166). 19. View of a crushed shell from Haddonfield, New Jersey. 20. View of a shell showing the curvature. 21,22. Opposite sides of casts showing the internal features described. 23,24. Enlargement of the surface of Fig. 19, and transverse section of the same. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. SERPULA (DIPLOCONCHA) CRETACEA Conrad ? (p-170). 25. View of the specimen described showing the general features, U, S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MONOGRAPH XVili PLATE xx 7 : : a} i} Hi + a1 SBbemesti es ki aes Pads TORNATELLIDA, CYLICHNIDAZ, BULLIDZ, AND DENTALIIDZ OF THE LOWER GREENSAND MARLS. A. _e ae — 7 = i r . LPS — ee ae SY. a — y e EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXI. PERISSOLAX TRIVOLVA Gabb (p. 172). FIG. 1. View of Mr. Gabb’s type specimen frou: the collection of the Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. 1,2. Two views of a specimen which has lost the beak. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., New York City. VOLUTODERMA ABBOTTI Gabb (p. 173). 4,5. Views of the opposite sides of the type specimen from the Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. 6, 7.. Two views of a specimen from the Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., New York City. 8,9. Similar views of a specimen from the Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. LunatTia HALui Gabb (p. 175). 10, 11. Views of the opposite sides of a specimen from Timber Creek, New Jersey, in the collec- tion of the Am, Mus. Nat. Hist., New York City. NATICA ABYSSINA Morton (p. 175). 12,13. Front and yertical views of a specimen from Timber Creek, New Jersey, in the collec- tion of the Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., New York City. 340 U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY , MONOGRAPH XViIl PLATE Xxi i ’ 7 sd MURICIDA, VOLUTIDZ, AND NATICIDZ OF THE MIDDLE BED GREENSAND MARLS, Dale PLATE X Fies. 1,2. 3. 342 EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXII. CaVOSCALA ANNULATA Mort. sp. (p. 177). Views of the opposite sides of a large specimen showing the general features. Basal view of the same specimen showing the character of the umbilical cavity and the flattened callosity around it. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. . Eniargement of four of the ribs from the body volution. . A further enlargement of one rib to show the finer vertical striz. PLEUROTOMARIA TINTONENSIS Whitf. (p. 178). . Vertical, basal, front and lateral views of the specimen described, which I am inclined to think is a European specimen. Collection at Columbia College. PLEUROTREMA SOLARIFORMIS Whitf. (p. 180). . Vertical and basal views of a large individual from the collection of the Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., New York City. . Lateral and basal views of one from the collection of Acad. Nat, Sci., Phila. Fig. 12 showing the casts of openings along the line of the slit. . View of a third specimen of the species. U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SCALARIIDAZ AND PLEUROTOMARIID4 OF THE MIDDLE BED GREENSAND MARLS. £5 \. | i Let ieee led bos aS. OG RES foes h Alyy, 3,4. ~1 | S 10; 11. 12, 13. 14, 15. 16, 17. 344 EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXIII. CARICELLA PLICATA Whitf. (p. 182). Views of the opposite sides of the specimen described. PLEUROTOMA FARMINGDALENSIS Whitf. (p. 185). Two views of the. type specimen showing all there is preserved of the cast. TURRITELLA PUMILLA Gabb (p. 187). Two views of a specimen presumed to be of this species, Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. PLEUROTOMARIA Brittont Whitf. (p. 188). Lateral, vertical, and basal views of the only east observed. ROSTELLITES Bicontcus Whitf. (p. 183). Two views of a large characteristic specimen, showing the features of the aperture very distinetly. ; Buia conrica Whitf. (p. 189). Two views of a very perfect cast from Shark River. Collection of Columbia College. VOLUTODERMA INTERMEDIA Whitf. (p. 184). Front view of the best cast observed, showing the three plications. Outline of a fragment showing the imprint of the exterior surface on the inside of the outer volution. ROSTELLARIA NOBILIS Whitf. (p. 186). Two views of the cast described. aan z MONOGRAPH XVill_ PLATE XXIII U. S. LOGICAL SURVEY TURBINELLIDAZ, VOLUTIDA, PLEUROTOMID, STROMBIDA, TURRITELLIDA, PLEUROTOMARIIDAZ, AND BULLIDZ. FROM THE BASE OF THE UPPER BED GREENSAND MARLS, ~ EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXIV. Notr.—On the plates of the Eocene the figured specimens, when not otherwise stated, may be found in the State collection at Rutgers College, or at Trenton, New Jersey. Murex (PTERONOTUS?) L&VAVARICOSUS Whitf. (p. 190). Figs. 1,2. Views of: opposite sides of the cast. : MuREX? sp. undetermined (p. 191). 3. View of a gutta-percha imprint taken from the natural mold. Triton EocensE Whitf. (p. 192). 4,5. Views of opposite sides of the cast deseribed. Fusus (UROSALPINX!) MULTICOSTATUS Whitf. (p. 200). 6,7. Two views of the cast, the latter with the beak in outline. RHINOCANTHA (?) ConraDi Whitf. (p. 191). 8. View of aspecimen from the Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. collection showing the lip extended above. 9-11. Three views of another specimen showing the base of the beak. Fusus PLEuRICosTaTA Whitf. (p. 195). 12. View of a cast showing the beak. 13,14. Two views of a larger cast without beak. Fusus ANGULARIS Whitf. (p. 194). 15,16. Views of the opposite sides of a specimen in the collection of the Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., New York City. 17,18. View of a broader specimen of the Rutgers College collection. 19. The exterier as obtained from an imprint. PSEUDOLIVA VETUSTA Conrad (p. 193). 20. View of the front of the only specimen seen. U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MONOGRAPH XViIIl PLATE XXIV MURICID4, TRITONIDZ, PURPURIDA, AND FUSID OF THE EOCENE LAYERS OF THE UPPER BED GREENSAND MARLS, He eee XX Figs. 1,2. 8,9. 10, 11. 12, 13. 348 EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXV. Fusus (NEPTUNEA) STAMINEA Conrad (p. 197). Lateral view, and view of the summit of the best specimens yet observed. Fusus (NEPTUNEA) HECTOR Whitf. (p. 199). . Views of the opposite sides of a small cast. . Similar views of a large individual destitute of the anterior beak. Fusus (NEPTUNEA) HECTOR var. MULTILINEATA Whitf. (p. 199). . View of the flattened cast showing all that is preserved. Fusus PEROBESUS Whitf. (p. 196). Views of the opposite sides of the specimen described. Fusus Eocenicus Whitf. (p. 198). Two views of a large cast retaining the anterior beak, and showing the imprint of an oyster which had attached to the inside of the body volution. Two views of a smaller cast which has lost the beak, but preserves thesurface markings. MONOGRAPH XVIIl PLATE XxXV U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY FUSID4 OF THE EOCENE LAYERS, UPPER BED GREENSAND MARLS. ieee by XOX WE EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXVI. Fusus Ppaucicostatus Whitf. (p. 196). 1. View of a small specimen showing nearly the entire form. 2,3. Views of the opposite side of a specimen showing some modification in form of the coste. 4,5, Views of a large individual retaining the anterior beak entire, but imbedded in the matrix so the opposite side could not be obtained in Fig. 5. 6. Enlargement of the surface from Fig. 4. FIGs. CLAVELLA RAPHANOIDES Conrad (p. 201). 7,8. Views of opposite sides of the specimen, the anterior beak preserved only on the matrix. FASCIOLARIA HERCULES Whitf. (p. 202). 9. View of a young specimen preserving the imprint of the beak in the matrix. 10. Another fragment preserving the upper volutions. 11. View of a large cast showing only slight nodes and the base of the beak, and a groove probably formed by the fold of the columella, 350 U. §. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MONOGRAPH XVIII PLATE XXV FUSIDZ AND FASCIOLARIIDZ OF THE EOCENE LAYERS OF THE UPPER BED GREENSAND MARLS. bel Be XX VET. EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXVIL a FASCIOLARIA HERCULES Whitt. (p- 202). Figs. 1,2. Views of the opposite sides of a large strongly nodose cast. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., New — x York City. FASCIOLARIA PROPINQUA Whitf. (p. 203). S 3. View of a cast preserving nearly the entire form. Collection of the Am. Mus. Nat. Hist , s- New York City. 2 ios FASCIOLARIA SAMSONI Whitf. (p. 204). 4. View of a fragment of a small cast, showing the imprint of an oyster. Am. Mus. Nat. — Hist., New York City. 302 - U. S. GEOLOGCAL SURVEY MONOGRAPH XVili PLATE XXVIII FASCIOLARIIDZ. OF THE EOCENE LAYERS OF THE UPPER BED GREENSAND MARLS. Pipe x XV LE, EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXVIII. FascIoLarta SaMsoNI Whitf. (p. 204). . a Figs. 1, 2. Views of opposite sides of a large cast imperfect at both extremities. The band aro nd the base of the upper volutions probably indicates the thickness of the shell at the sutures, = 304 J - “SIUVW GNWSN33YH9 G39 ¥3ddN SHL JO SYSAV7 3N3003 SHL 40 YaliyNWIoOlOsW4 INAXX BLWId HIAK Hd VHOONOW ASAUNS 1¥9I901039 *S *N wr eae Ae XTX: EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXIX. CARICELLA PYRULOIDES Conrad (p. 205). * 1,2. Two views of specimen of medium size. Collection of Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., New York City. “a 3, 4. Similar views of another specimen, Fig. 3 showing imprints of the columellar folds. 5. View of a small cast from the Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. collection, New York City, sh imprints of columellar folds. ; 6. View of a shell from Claiborne, Alabama, for comparison. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., New City. ; CARICELLA PONDEROSA Whitf. (p. 206). 7, 8. Lateral view showing columellar folds, and summit view of the specimen described. — 356 MONOGRAPH XVIIl PLATE XXIX 2 U. &, GEOLOGICAL SURVEY TURBINELLIDZ OF THE EOCENE LAYERS OF THE UPPER BED GREENSAND MARLS. ree XX Oe. EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXxX. Vo.tuta Leia Whitf. (p. 207). Fics. 1,2. Two views of avery perfect cast, but slightly distorted from compression. 3. The outer volution of the same specimen lifted to show imprints of columellar folds. VOLUTA PERELEVATA Whitf. (p. 208). 4,5. Two views of a fragment, the latter having the lower part of the last volution removed so as to expose the imprints of columellar folds. Collection Am. Mus, Nat. Hist., New York City. 6. View of another fragment. VOLUTILITHES CANCELLATUS Whitf. (p. 213). 7-10. Views of four different individuals showing the diversity of surface features, Fig. 9 showing columellar folds; this and Fig. 7 are from specimens in Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., New York City. VOLUTILITHES Sayana Conrad (p. 212). 11-14. Views of four specimens showing diversity of form and surface. Figs. 11, 12 are from the collection Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., New York City, the latter showing columellar folds. 15. View of a specimen from Claiborne, Alabama, showing a medium of features. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., New York City. 358 Oa a PLATE XXX MONOGRAPH XVIII U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY VOLUTIDZ OF THE EOCENE LAYERS OF THE UPPER BED GREENSAND MARLS. of) PLATE XXX. 7 EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXXI. VOLUTA PARVULA Whitf. (p. 208). Fics. 1,2. Two views of a very broad specimen. 3. View of a narrower specimen. 4. The outer half of the last volution removed to show the colamellar folds. 5. View of a specimen donbtfully referred to this species, and showing a mammillated a Am, Mus. Nat. Hist. VoOLUTA SCAPHOIDES Whitf. (p. 209). 6-8. Three views of a cast of this species, Fig. 6 haying a part removed to show the colu- mellar folds. Am. Mus. Nat, Hist. ae 360 U, §. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MONOGRAPH XVIll PLATE XXX! ENSAND MARLS. VOLUTIDZ OF THE EOCENE LAYERS OF THE UPPER BED GRE enews AUX Td. EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXXII. VoLutTa NEWCOMBIANA Whitf. (p. 211). Fies. 1,2. Two views of a specimen of the ordinary form. 3. View of a shorter spired form showing cavities of the columellar folds. These are from the collection Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. e Votuta VEsTa Whitf. (p. 210). 4,5. Two views of an imperfect cast. 6. Represents the lower part of specimen shown by the faint line on Fig. 4, removed to uae : the folds on its lower surface. Am. Mus, Nat. Hist. 362 f PLATE Xxxil MONOGRAPH XVIII U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY EE ae VOLUTIDZ OF THE EOCENE LAYERS OF THE UPPER BED GREENSAND MARLS. flee bee Xe Ep. Figs. 1,2. 14. 20-22. 23. 24, 25. 26, 27. 364 EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXXII. CANCELLARIA RUDIS Whitf. (p. 214). Opposite sides of the cast showing the features described. PLEUROTOMA SURCULTIFORMIS Whitf. (p. 215). . View of a specimen of the ordinary form. . View of a larger and more robust specimen. SURCULA PEROBESA Whitf. (p. 217). . Opposite sides of the best specimens observed. PLEUROTOMA REGULARICOSTATA Whitf. (p. 215). . Views of three casts referred to the species. The last, showing no plice on the last volu- tion, is from the collection Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., New York City. PLEUROTOMA (SURCULA) ALTISPIRA Whitf. (p. 216). . Opposite sides of the same cast. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., New York City. . View of a fragment showing the strize more strongly. . View of another specimen donbtfully of this species. SURCULIIES ANNOSUS Conrad (p. 218). View of the back of the specimen upon which Mr. Conrad founded his species and genus. SURCULITES CADAVEROSUS Whitf. (p. 219). View of the opposite sides of a characteristic form of this species. SURCULITES cuRTUS Whitf. (p. 220). . Two views of an imperfect cast. . View of the larger whorl of a specimen showing the difference in size of the next one above as compared with that of S. annosa. CYPREA SABULOVIRIDIS Whitf. (p. 223). Three views of the same cast, the latter view showing the aperture and its crenulations. CALYPTRAPHORUS VELATUS Conrad (p. 222). View of a cast showing the direction and cicatrix of the posterior canal. Two views of another cast showing some of the same features and the vertical folds on the apical volutions. Two views of a specimen from Claiborne, Alabama, for comparison. Collection Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., New York City. MONOGRAPH XVIII PL. XXXII U. §. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CANCELLARIIDZ, PLEUROTOMIDA, STROMBIDA, AND CYPR4ID4 OF THE EOCENE LAYERS OF THE UPPER BED GREENSAND MARLS. in PLATH XXXIV. Figs, 1,2. 3, 4. 13-15. 16,17. 18-21. 22. 23-27. 366 EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXXIV. NATICA GLOBULELLA Whitf. (p. 226). Upper and lower views of a distorted specimen. Similar views of another and differently compressed example. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., New York City. Ficus PENITUS Conrad.? (p. 225). . View of the best specimen observed. XENOPHORA LAPIFERENS Whitf. (p. 227). . Upper view of a cast, showing the scars left by the attached stones. . Imprint in gutta-percha from a matrix, showing surface strive and adhering stones and remaining scars. . Lateral and lower view of another cast; this is from the collection Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., ; New York City. SCALARIA TENUILIRATA Whitf. (p. 229). . View of the exterior as obtained by gutta percha from the matrix of a specimen in the Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., New York City. . Internal cast of the same individual. 12. Enlargement of the surface from the body volution. MESALIA ELONGATA Whitf. (p. 230). Views of three individuals, Fig. 13 from gutta-percha. CONUS SUBSAURIDENS Conrad (p. 221). Views of the opposite sides of the best specimen seen. CASSIDARIA CARINATA Lam, ? (p. 224). Views of different specimens showing variation of surface. Specimens 19 and 20, Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., New York City. Views of a fragment showing extreme variation of surface characters. Possibly a distinet species. ARCHITECTONICA ANNOSA Conrad (p. 228). Views of three separate casts, the smaller one, Figs. 23, 26, 27, showing surface striz, and plications around the edges of the umbilicus. Am, Mus, Nat. Hist., New York City. Fig. 24 is from Mr, Conrad’s type. MONOGRAPH XVIIl PL. XXXIV U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 7% ENE LAYERS OF AND TURRITELLID OF THE EOC! THE UPPER BED GREENSAND MARLS. CONIDA, CASSIDIDZ, DOLIIDZ, NATICIDZ, ONUSTIDA, SOLARIIDZ, SCALARIIDA, deal ads XX KY. Z aa 32 7 2 7 2 An , ~ : - we . See é Le 2 : 7 = a) pong EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXXV. LEPTOMARIA ? PERLATA Con. (p. 232). Fies. 1,2. Summit and basal views of a small specimen showing the apertural slit along the angn- lation. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., New York City. 3,4. Lateral and basal views of Courad’s type specimen. TREMATOFUSUS VENUSTUS Whitf. (p. 235). =. 5,6. Views of two individuals differing in the height of spire and angulation of body volution, 7. View of another specimen as obtained by gutta-percha from the matrix. 368 MONOGRAPH XVili PL. XXXV U. 8. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ee PLEUROTOMARIIDA OF THE EOCENE LAYERS OF THE UPPER BED GREENSAND MARLS. Py vi XO VT. Fa) i a Peete ewan xyor- oe “~S EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXXVI. LEPTOMARIA GIGANTEA Whitf. (p. 233). 1,2. Lateral and basal views of the type specimen. 4 LePTOMARIA PERGRANULOSA Whitf. (p. 234). = i : : 3,4. Vertical and lateral views obtained by gutta-percha in the matrix. ee y 5. Enlargement of the surface of a part of Fig. 3. j : , 6. Basal view of a part of the cast of the same individual. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., New York City. a ACTON PRISCA Conrad (p. 237). 7,8. Two views of Conrad’s ty pe specimen. TORNATELLZA LATA Conrad (p. 238). 9,10. Views of two individual casts of this species. , ‘TORNATINA WETHERELLI Lea (p. 239). 11. This is a copy of Mr, Lea’s figure cited under the description, 370 U. 8. GEOLOGICAL suRVEY MONOGRAPH xviii PL. xxxvi yk a Ie oie X XV LI. | pee OP lie >: Fics. EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXXVII. Nautitus Dekayi Morton (p. 243). 1. View of a small specimen from Marlboro, New Jersey. ‘ “fe 2,3. Lateral and back view of the specimen figured by Dr. Morton. Acad. Nat. eo pe = Philadelphia. 4. View of another specimen from the Academy’s collection. cf 5,6. Two views of a specimen loaned by G. F. Kunz, obtained near Hillsboro, New te cole 372 oe MONOGRAPH XVIII PL. XXXVI U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY NAUTILIDZ OF THE LOWER BED GREENSAND MARLS. . e Hele Al a'r Pl fe eee Ra WIT, EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXXVIII. NavuTiILus DEKAyI Morton (p. 243). Fics. 1. View of the aperture side of the cast figured by Dr. Morton (see Pl. xxxvu, Figs. 2 and 3) 2. View of a small imperfect cast, showing the siphon and the convexity of the septa. N Marlboro, New Jersey. ; ; 3,4. Two views of a small specimen from the Middle Marls at J. S. Cook’s pits, near Tinto1 New Jersey. This differs slightly in shape and in the distance between the septa may possibly prove a distinct species. Navutitus Bryant Gabb (p. 244). ; ae 5,6. Lateral view and view of the inside of Mr. Gabb’s type, showing the narrow form and — flattened sides. From the yellow sands of the Middle Marls at Vincentown, New Jer- sey. : pice 374 MONOGRAPH XVIIl_ PL. XXXVIIT U. 5. GEOLOGICAL at * So ae a ee d Cc 2 S GREENSAND MARLS. NAUTILID4Z OF THE LOWER AND MIDDLE BED: é a | oy pee WT 2 SE eS PLATE XXXIX. erat ATE XXXIX. LA N OF P the o1 aie z i £03 me i a é ae | Ap ‘ hal fe é : be 2 a 7 23 EXP natu view, Lateral z: i> : ¥ a f : | ey MONOGRAPH XVIII PL. XXXIX —_—<—$——————————————— U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY NAUTILIDAZZ OF THE MIDDLE BED GREENSAND MARLS. ane = eee al - _ 74 é , . Zz mapeee . E : E ¥ ~ ae oT ear) _ aes ; a ee ; - 9 "es Pa | a is P "hh he = & ‘ ~~ ® . af EXPLANATION OF PLATE Xl. AMMONITES (PLACENTACERAS) PLACENTA, De Kay (p. 255). Fic. 1. Lateral view of a large specimen, which shows the septa throughont ~ Acad, } Phila. ee» | 378 ‘ * bid U. S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 7) pS] ioe =< = a z er Do Zz Ww WwW cc oO a uw a [eat ul = ° a Ww xr - ue (o) és fa) E Zz fe) = = < Figs. ie 3,4. 380 EXPLANATION OF PLATE XLI. AMMONITES (PLACENTACERAS) PLACENTA, De Kay (p. 255). Outline of a septum, natural size, from near the outer part of the specimen figured on Pl. x1, but from the opposite side. . View of a small specimen from near Freehold, showing the umbilicus and the lines of nodes at its outer margin. AMMONITES DENTATO-CARINATUS Roem. (p. 250). Two views of the only fragment of the species known from New Jersey. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. AMMONITES COMPLEXUS Hall & Meek (p. 249). . Lateral and dorsal views of the only fragment seen from within the State. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. . Diagram of a septum as far as it can be traced. AMMONITES (SPHENODISCUS) LENTICULARIS Owen (p. 258). . View of a fragment from near the umbilicus, representing parts of several chambers of a rather large specimen. . View of another fragment from near the dorsal margin of a large specimen. These two are all Fhave seen of the species from New Jersey. AMMONITES (PLACENTACERAS) TILIFER Morton (p. 257). . View of the fragment figured by Dr. Morton in his Synopsis. 11. View of a larger fragment, also from Dr. Morton’s collection, showing the dorsal line. U. &. GEOLOGICAL siinvEY MONOGRAPH XVIIl PLATE XLI AMMONITID OF THE LOWER AND MIDDLE BEDS GREENSAND MARLS. Wee, Sell. Figs. EXPLANATION OF PLATE XLII. AMMONITES VANUXEMI Morton (p. 253). 1, 2. Lateral and dorsal views of Dr. Morton’s type. 3,4. Profile and lateral views of a larger specimen from the collection of the Am. Mus. Nat. History. j 5. An enlarged outline (2x) of a septum from the outer portion of the last specimen. AMMONITES DELAWARENSIS Morton (p. 252). 6,7. Lateral and dorsal views of a small specimen, showing the narrow volution in strong contrast with Fig. 4. 8. Lateral view of a larger specimen. Both are from the Acad. Nat. Sciences collection. | 9. Diagram, natural size, of the species from the specimen ES iap on Pl. xii, and showing strong contrast with Fig. 5, 382 U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY AMMONITID4 OF THE LOWER BED GREENSAND MARLS. ‘PLATE XLIIL. rh.¢ i eS - iat * = tt rat 2 ‘ : Pere e >. ase * EXPLANATION OF PLATE XLIII. AMMONITES DELAWARENSIS Morton (p. 252). { Fics. 1,2. Lateral and profile views of a large specimen from the collection of th Acad. Nat. Phila. The diagram of a septum, Fig 9 on Pl. xu, is from the outer part of specimen, : m1 oe 334 : ® SIYVW GNYSN3349 G38 Y3MO7 3HL JO WCILINOWWY WAX 341d. WAX HavHDONOW = ee eee " « 7 hag £ aes - " ’ bs. * p,\ 7) “e ‘ ie & NS a ee = lt - \ we Th _ = TON Py u~ -_ _—- 7 @ me See ee e 2 we BY, EXPLANATION OF PLATE XLIV. SCAPHITES SIMILIS Whif. (p. 267). Fics. 1. Lateral view of the specimen described. 2. Diagram of a septum, twice enlarged. Acad. Nat. Sei., Phila. . SCAPHITES RENIFORMIS Morton (p. 264). 3. A reproduction of Dr. Morton’s figure, no authentic specimen having been seen. . SCAPHITES 1k1s Conrad (p. 265). 5. Dorsal and lateral views of one of Mr. Conrad’s types. } : 6. Lateral view of the specimen originally figured by Mr. Conrad. 7. View of an outer chamber, also one of his types. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. SCAPHITES HIPPOCREPIS De Kay (p. 261). 8. Lateral view of the specimen originally figured by Dr. Morton. 9-11. Lateral, dorsal, and vertical views of a larger specimen, both being in the Acad. Nat. Sci. collection. 7 12. Diagram of a septum, twice enlarged, from the last. SCAPHITES NODOSUS Owen (p. 261). 4 i vite . 13,14. Lateral and dorsal views of a fragment of an outer chamber referred to this species. Rutgers College. 386 MONOGRAPH XVIII PLATE XLIV U. 5. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY AMMONITIDZ OF THE LOWER BED GREENSAND MARLS. CIF MTA WY ZONTY BAIA ~ 4 i { (PAS) Vid aaa soren thos! a : Lantiopel eaittiveie O08 ho cole oliieyid ont tu aw 7 eaeyet eS ‘witoik Gina) To ewely 900A! hig amy) 4 ~< "6" Lensbisi wilted TobeiA Wlebialimsn <2 eulT deegeedue void ny) tose Ve went avin sralin lay dere. ni io & ee ECL. } cone. 1d fered Proriyutnye GAT 4a eile moe wey terete, tute gievinoy dirutl 4 ,T\0 7 Aw oto oat bad? Wahl gy pereat to rite yh ie j UGE 73 1A90N env) Aaeeioomiasr all = or ine ‘ : bs Vv By Ne Patt! din aan tea Ye re ee A rOhiot£ ttl Ve serie ay wor bec cel ilierT 2) at A ue Fae asda ds airs Lope lioh of4 gual aeamivge ay Fines be , kod 24 ST aero wlna st AE woth A eT) Gertrdie od a7) We per Pay iurhrciote teat dif tired Aidt lien melt OF witherdiel) worn De activate de elite eter eh aeF Dak, Gil? orl tol iials Wei e Peltor: Vo toeoomeat AT) ed ; ; a ~~ S it a ‘ ‘el on * _ id E - . i 7 > 7 al 7 7 Fies. 1,2. 3,4. 5. 6,7, 8. 9, 10, 11. 12, 13. 14. 388 EXPLANATION OF PLATE XLV. TURRILITES PAUPER Whitf. (p. 268). Views of the opposite sides of the specimen described. Upper and lower views of the same specimen. Diagram of a septum, twice enlarged. This was accidentally shaded below instead of above the line as is done in case of other diagrams. : PTYCHOCERAS (SOLENOCERAS) ANNULIFER Morton (p. 273). Dorsal, ventral, and lateral views, twice enlarged, of the specimen used by Dr. Morton in the original description. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. HETEROCOCERAS CONRAD! Morton (p. 269). Profile, upper and lower views of Dr. Morton’s type. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. Lower and profile views of another specimen, being the deflected outer chamber only, the - elevated end showing evidences of the last septum. This is from the Atlantic High- lands of New Jersey, and is from Columbia College collection. A fragment of another outer chamber from the Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila, MONOSRAPH XVIil_ PLATE XLV U. 5. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY AMMONITID OF THE LOWER BED GREENSAND MARLS. meme i , ae ey XLV, . ia if ay Figs. 4 Pa el Z z 7 te ; ee Yea > i. = “ “ , a EXPLANATION OF PLATE XLVI. BACULITES COMPRESSUS (Say) Morton (p. 277). 1. Lateral view of the specimen used and figured by Dr. Morton in his synopsis. The dia- gram below shows the form of the section. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. 2. Diagram of a septum of the above specimen (2 x). BACULITES OVATUS Say (p. 275) 7 | 3,4. Lateral view of the Mullica Hill specimen in the collection of the Am. Mus. Nat. History, New York, and diagram of the section showing an oval outline. 5,6. Lateral view of a specimen showing an ovate section and diagram of the section. — 7. Diagram (2 X) of a septum of the specimen Fig. 6, for comparison with Fig. 2. 8,9. View of a small specimen from the Middle Marls, near Tinton Falls, New Jersey, and a diagram of its section. BACULITES ASPER Morton (p. 278). 10. Lateral view of a fragment supposed to belong to this species. 11. View of the upper end of the fragment showing the septum in part. 390 MONOGRAPH XVIIl_ PLATE XLVI U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY AMMONITID4 OF THE LOWER AND MIDDLE BEDS GREENSAND MARLS. ere ts SP OMPTa ZZ NTAdT AO UOTTAYK AIT Y &. c . ~ : = ~~“ ‘ VS aodN areninan) NTT Ws . sieyuyy4 iif adult tl 9G - Oividath Hoo ) melting. : 2. 3 nv : 3% altlde it ’ mgoltoly cos ity f Saban AP Be Soni V cae Wale ete i ae 3 ; A . Vinnie Tite rie ead wired »” vt ? biol Bibs ar We ali mitt galery feta eHWel Sih) ak food vs ; * a itt tu aol / at —ogln hited ied) wuld Yr wods wien cepa Beal ald Vr yi vay vy . ; fe ont ont dite on ; ApolioD sew eyhalran ‘argue mah yurvod i.) Ftes. 10,11. Views of a phragmocone showing the septa! markings, Rutgers College. : Vie 2 rn Py : ie, : F i a ej = ——— x 7 a nae : é des. % is ° ? EXPLANATION OF PLATE XLVILI. BELEMNITELLA AMERICANA Morton (p. 280). 1,2. Views of the opposite sides of a small individual fignred by Dr. Morton in his Synopsis under the name Belemnites subfusiformis, Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. 3. View of a heavy thickened specimen much rounded at the base. Rutgers College. 4. A smaller specimen, showing the mucronation at the base. Rutgers College. 5,6. Two views of a very large individual presenting the usual form, Rutgers College. 7. View of part of the same after having been split longitudinally. 8. View of a small specimen imperfect at the lower end, but preserving the walls of the cavity out to a thin margin. Am. Mus. Nat. History. 9. View of the filling of the alveolar cavity of the last specimen, showing the thickened ridge on the cast on the side opposite to the slit in the stylet. : 392 PLATE XLVI MONOGRAPH XvViil U. 5S, GEOLOGICAL SURVEY aa SS 1 al EN art oe + BELEMNITID4 OF THE LOWER BED GREENSAND MARLS. Fig. r) fi mt. , ¢ air, Saale me A. ae is > 4 * a e EXPLANATION OF PLATE XLVIII. ¥ | , y ¢ ia -NauTiLus Cookana Whitf. (p. 285). é 1. View of a large specimen which has been obliquely compressed. A portion of the coil has been removed to show the inner volution, cast of the umbilicus, ete. The wood-cut ont- line on page 286 is of the opposite side of this specimen. 394 ad U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MONOGRAPH XVIII PLATE XLVI! nn eae NAUTILIDZ OF THE EOCENE LAYERS OF THE UPPER BED GREENSAND MARLS. i = ae y ela tite eve wild git bo wad) compris oe 4 male ie : jivGh = 7 > Tie be | We ould trovetites gon Saee Beets LATE See ne red Sie exit Mat be . 7 phen DT el Dil tenis Gat) puttin baytiene wit) wg Hi epee GR! 1 ory iarrtap Latin iyi: been -lotiin) re any chichu cttesly Dereon tey heh Seed! wr very wife old be porns 12M eB ptoded bie A | : [eK wo A fihveme deli tan Th ; i” tv EXPLANATION OF PLATE XLIX. ATURIA VANUXEMI Conrad (p. 287). Figs. 1. Profile view showing the inside of a septum, the two sinuses formed by the spire, and the broad funnel-formed siphon. 2. View of the side of a small individual broken so as to show the inner volution, the filling of the large siphon and the junction of some of the septa with it. 3. View of the filling of a single chamber as obtained from a gutta-percha impression in the outer cup of the specimen figured on Pl. L, The cast straightened somewhat, giving less arcuation, but greater length of the ventral portion than should be. The part. marked a represents the funnel-formed siphonal depression of the septum. NavTiLus Cooxana Whitf. (p. 285). 4,5, Dorsal and lateral views of a young specimen of the species, somewhat compressed dorso- ventrally, showing the distant septa and filling of the umbilical cavity. Am. Mus. Nat. History Collection. 396 MONOGRAPH XVIIl_ PLATE XLIX U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY NAUTILID4 OF THE EOCENE LAYERS OF THE UPPER BED GREENSAND MARLS. 2 5 Fic. 7: 1. Lateral view of a large cast from Shark River, showing the lines of septa very distinctly. — 398 EXPLANATION OF PLATE L. _ATURIA VANUXEMI Conrad (p. 287). The specimen is probably somewhat compressed laterally, but not otherwise distort The profile view on Pl. XLIx is of the same specimen. Rutgers College. MONOGRAPH XVii| PLATE L U. S$. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY F THE UPPER BED GREENSAND MARLS. NAUTILIDZ OF THE EOCENE LAYERS O ACTON attenuata . biplicata....-..- SPUEENER COMDD: -caecpee sencecc ccet=aaneqcacerrens 106, 000 Gabbana Whitf ..-...-- 156, 336 subovoides W .-..-..-- 155, 336 onoidea Gabb.......-- 158, 162 prisca Conrad... 237, 370 Forbesiana Whitf- - 167, 336 Wetherelli Lea. ..... 239 AcCT#ONEMA Conrad .......---+- aeee 236 PTISCH .----- 2-20 e nee e eee ee ee eee 237 Acteonina biplicata 156 naticoides ...-...-- 161 Alabama, Eocene fossils of . 30, 31 ALARIA rostrata Gabb 119, 326 AMAUROPSIS Meekana Wh-..--..-.-.----- Ae 131, 330 paludineformis H.and M ..-.- --- 131, 132, 330 punctata Gabb.....-.---- ----+-20eeee nese oreo ee 132, 330 Ammonceratites Conradi Mort. . meses oe 269 AMMONITES, Brug .----------+--2e-ce--eeeecennne nes 249 complexus ...-..---+--- +--+ +20 -- ee ee eee ee eee eee 249, 380 Delawarensis . 252, 382, 384 dentato-carinatus. .. .-- 250, 380 hippocrepis ..--.------- 262 lenticularis - 258 (SPHENODISCUS) lenti nee ey lobatus .......----- Saeen = ale aeaa sale mela Seen ae 258 nodosus -- eomneeenne aroseces st cose se SSe28 261 placentus ....--------++---- (PLACENTICERAS) placenta .. (PLACENTICERAS) telifer Mort ..-.--.-----------+ VeLGfOT ono cen cunaeccne-os-sescunss Steeeeecosass 257 SS 253, 382 249 210 . 113, 326 focst Soa 114, 326 arenaria Mort.......--..-....---. Sieeeta ae Sena 112, 326 (DRAPANOCHILUS) compressa Wh .-. - 117,324 pagodaformis Wh - 116,326 pennata Mort ....-.... . 115, 326 rostrata Page AVELLANA bullata Mort ...--.--cece--e+-eeee--2005 - 163, 338 BACULITES asper.-----.---- . 278,390 compressus .....- 277, 390 OVMGUS = o25ecaeewe=n= 275, 390 BELEMNITELLA Americana 280, 392 MUCTONALE ..-.- .n--02---2-0ee 280 PAKlOSUS 22.222 nena e ene n nee seeecenneennnernee: 280 subfusiformis..... 280 BRLEMNITES ambiguas - 280 Americanus ....-- 280 subconicus .. 280 BuCCINID# ..-..-- 77 Buccinorbis vetusta ..-.----.--- so 193 Buccinum vetustum ...200--0+000 193 BuLia conica Wh... mae 189, 344 Mortoni, L.and F .........----.-------- Tess 165, 338 TELE nas cencencncccscceuscoss 164 RRUGLID A. < occ cc e555. pemnncenncee= 165, 189 CA#LATURA Con ..-...-...--------- 236 CALYPTRAPHORUS velatus Conrad 222, 364 CANCELLARIA Hilgardi (Conrad), Gabb....---------- 100 rudis Whitf--..........-----..-- oacscaaer=nes men Alm oO septemlirata. ..-..----+---seeceeeee ners ete ee eens 44 (Mertca) subalta Con 95, 322 CANCELLARIIDA .---.-----+-+ 95, 214 CARICELLA plicata Wh...... 182, 344 ponderosa Wh ...-.----- 206, 356 pyraloides Gonrell Coecnecenancevpunnenn Sears sci 205, 356 CASSIDARIA carinata Lam..... Seuueas sescdvescuna | (MOGRIGID IR Ge oan an eaieeee esas cee AOssaone- 83, 172, 190 ONT GO ee aaa ee ee sella eens ae 71 | Natica abyssina Mort.........-..-- caresotos 123, 175, 328, 340 CO 14 Spe OBER OC HEC cebeseeSccsns: stance 86 alveata .------..--- 127 UBED Aieenn ss a seaee anaes aa ee seen een ae eee 62, 194 (Gyrodes) crenata . 126 Fusus angularis Wh......-.----- 194, 346 globulella Wh... 226, 366 (NEpTuNEA) Eocenicus Wh.. 198, 348 infracarinata .........+ aisieea‘a(elcn'sicla'ae ene eae 125 hector! Wiis. 22-aeneeece === seen ences 217 Delawarensis Gabb .. 84, 318 annosus Con ..... a5 218, 364 OTE aanedesanenaia 212 cadeverosus Wh......- 219, 364 Kanet ........ Spanner eae 76 curtus Wh.-----.-- 220, 364 Lelia Wh ........ Ame OSR hao see ectissececee ses 207, 358 Sycotypus penitus.......---+ 225 mucronata 75 Tables showing genera and species in New Jersey (SCAPHELLA) Newcombiana Wh 211, 362 aud else whore) -ss-seee~s2=sena= ete OS = AOU AE 24, 31 PATUG ~~ 22 ~~ wen nee ewe eee ne ee eee eee 212 ‘TECTIBRANCHIATA ..2-00ccectecce, iy sip cra EAR” > 8 Pata a ee ee eos, ty rte sy ey | ewe Naat. alii ey 7 ‘$2 aed, ee ‘sirens yin eee) a a Geen. ey eee Atedaee - ey sented he Deade bh bth ied : a F r jane en htc wt wie wl WL eS ey he PM he ath i eee a te wi) de sme fie ee | mh She» ph baled 2 a gr AD ‘ { we SIRES a phe nat Bros ps id - lel ae Vitsdn stn asta Ate ie ba oily) elie > wo | ORR Reed, i ag 44 /T eR nasa ry wees tans! ate dy hemi CEE a Lae wl + fay “a5 1h aria A a, > iptlep arly Md vse Oe Ss SAG Lik +1, ier I ve 4 iw Rae Path yp Wah) jy 1d re. 7 ahi Tsanans Madd ah ea Thee a Pop Very Moe Mop iathn, vey it, t Share tard — Valea dis Ae by Mem oy] bse ae ent bh a tele Re Ped vagy Wis “Wak oa daa ha Ae! opie dah g tated Pg | me) teenie WA ete Tigi n ae cP) ite et a Py eee oe. ico ghey . aint ; Mis * ined ti fy in AE on hy oe We BO BRIAN (Ly Win sad Yui Migl? te eee fel Bands A eerie! Aes oY Said ae id 4 SOs sya Ga, pike Sy gal dial OF @ ecw te VY abe VR ok Astle Lf nd Whe DA ay bt sed + NON ay ney, epee ee Fe. veg dad ites eR. favge; aA, i ae an CAT URTY abhi Minakesia iy Jah 5 Le WE Ji 5 RN ee ie Wukeiieitcl el! 7... it: te E08 timmy Mes ‘Awe oe #104 vie tal nese ak wire Way REPY eit, ea ale ee a a eT piasoh tal A “pT Wl ce Reey an alas ih a ee en Sey 1) \er ae? facta 4d aie RE all bi eh Biter As ry sr alae ae , Wika Bhai dike rat Ribena ee * 1D ee et ek Oe COW ROE eu bees ie