: sorters gttsreesesteatte £ ssteeemeesaetgtenespsees eee Bsraseaseitirigeseat seaeyeste- 3g 3 Tore! rate ies 3. Me Meee 0 THE MONTHLY MAGAZINE, on BRITISH REGISTER OF LITERATURE, SCIENCES, AND THE BELLES-LETTRES. New SeriesgP PRESEN oY Ss v , 4 " = OM 4 joa JULY TO DECEMBER. — VOL. XII. LONDON: PUBLISHED BY WHITTAKER, TREACHER, AND CO., AVE-MARIA-LANE. 1831, wo “SATSaAS 3 e LONDON: HENRY BAYLIS, PRINTER, JOHNSON'S-COURT, FLEET-STREET- THE MONTHLY MAGAZINE OF POLITICS, LITERATURE, AND THE BELLES LETTRES. - Vor. XII.] JULY, 1831. [ No. 67. EUROPE AND THE ENGLISH PARLIAMENT. Tue legislature which is to effect the great work of change has met at last ; and its first operation is announced to be “ Reform.” We shall not stigmatize the word’ by giving it the meaning which thousands and tens of thousands of the most desperate and dark-minded rabble that’ ever tried the wisdom, or cried out for the downfal of a state, have given. We shall listen to those graver casuists, who deny that it is * Revolution ;” while they admit that it reaches to its verge. We, shall, for the moment, range ourselves with the well-wishers to the " measure, and ask in the most deliberate spirit, whether it tends to good or evil. But first, of the King’s speech. On Tuesday, the 21st of June, a day which will make itself long memorable, his Majesty delivered the following sentiments :— “ My Lords and Gentlemen.—I have availed myself of the earliest oppor- tunity of resorting to your advice and assistance,-after the dissolution of the late Parliament. Having had recourse to that measure for the purpose of. ascertaining the sense of my people on the expediency of a reform in the representation, I have now to recommend that important question to your earliest and most attentive consideration, confident that in any measures you may propose for its adjustment, you will carefully adhere to the acknowledged principles -of the constitution, by which the prerogative of the crown, the authority of both Houses of Parliament, and the rights and liberties of the people, are equally secured. The assurances of a friendly disposition, which I continue to receive from all foreign powers, encourage the hope that, notwith- standing the civil commotions which have disturbed some parts of Europe, and the contest now existing in Poland, the general peace will be maintained. To. the preservation of this blessing, my most anxious care will be constantly di- rected. The discussions which have taken place on the affairs of Belgium have not yet been brought to a conclusion ; but the most complete agreement con- tinues to subsist between the powers whose plenipotentiaries have been engaged in the Conferences of London. The principle on which these con- ferences has been conducted, has been that of not interfering with the rights of the people of Belgium to regulate their. internal affairs, and to establish their government according .to their own views of what may be most con= ducive to their future welfare and independence, under the sole condition, sanctioned by the practices of nations, and founded on the principles of public law, that, in the exercise of that undoubted right, the security of neighbouring states should not be endangered. A series of injuries and insults, for which, notwithstanding repeated pines ewes all reparation M.M. New Series. Vou. XII.—No. 67. 2 Europe, and the English Parliament. [Juny, was withheld, compelled me at last to order a squadron of my fleet to appear before Lisbon, with a peremptory demand of satisfaction. A prompt com- pliance with that demand, prevented the necessity of further measures, but I have not yet been enabled to re-establish my diplomatic relations with the Portuguese government.” The only facts to be gleaned from this part of the speech are, that his Majesty hopes that general peace will be preserved, though universal war is preparing, and that the continent will be undisturbed, though every power is increasing its army, and though Russia and Poland are tearing each other in pieces. That his Majesty relies on the co-operation of the five great powers, though Belgium is as disturbed as ever and much more intractable. And that, though Portugal, by the presence of a fleet, has been compelled to comply with the demands of satisfaction ; yet, that she is stubborn as ever, and has made no advance to an intercourse with England. The paragraph addressed exclusively to the House of Commons, merely recommends economy ; while the paragraph to the two Houses, announces that new taxes will be necessary :— “J trust that such additional means as may be required to supply a part of the deficiency occasioned by these reductions, may be found without any material abridgment of the comforts of my people. To assist the industry, to improve the resources, and to maintain the credit of the country on sound principles, and on a safe and lasting foundation, will be at all times the object of my solicitude.” On this point we must wait for the ministers’ explanation of that phrase of many meanings, “ sound principles,’ before we can venture to congratulate the country on the national credit. The matter is one which least bears being tampered with of anything in the whole range of ministerial responsibility ; and let what will come, we must protest against the sponge. But in touching on the affairs of Ireland, we have the open and formidable admission, that the disturbances there are of a kind to demand the full vigilance of the laws, nay of more, to demand a declara- tion from the King, that if the punishments held out already by the laws, are not sufficient to crush the spirit of insubordination, the Irish shall have more laws, that is more punishments. Yet while the present punishments are the dungeon, transportation, and hanging, we can discover nothing beyond them, but, perhaps, the mitraillade and massacre. We are inclined to find no fault with this document. It has evidently been framed to avoid all collision of opinion, and by adhering to a few simple points, which nobody could contradict, and avoiding principles which all men might dispute, pass over in tranquillity at least one night of the session. Nor can we feel any hostility to the cabinet over which Lord Grey presides. Whatever we may think of his rashness, no man can charge him with dishonesty. His theories may be fantastic but his hands are clean; and if the constitution is to be assailed, we should rather see it assailed by the straight-forward and declared inno- vation of Lord Grey, than defended by the hollow-heartedness, the loathsome hypocrisy, the petty-larceny shifts and subtleties of the band over whom he triumphed, after they themselves had exhausted the patience, the feeling, and the force, all but the contempt, of Toryism. If we must fall, let it be by some hand that dignifies our fall ; by the assault 1831.] Europe, and the English Parliament. 3 of some daring weapon not unworthy of the contest that decides the fate of men of honour ; not by the poison administered by the hand of a slave, not by the steel of the assassin, terrified at his own attempt, and at last wound up to the deed for his hire. If we are to see the constitution of the empire perish, let it be where champion smites champion through the joints of his armour, not in the unsuspecting hour, and by an arrow in the heel. It is reported that there are to be large modifications -of the bill: For those we must await the discussion in the House. One there must be. If the qualification is not raised, the constitution will be not changed, but extinguished ; the House of Commons, not the representa- tives of the nation, nor even of the populace, but the tool of the rabble. Before two parliaments had sat, the ten-pound electors would order the House of Commons to register their will without the formality of a debate ; and for the peerage and the throne there would be no alternative but civil war. But as to the king’s speech we are quite of the Marquis of Londonderry’s opinion :—“ He congratulated the government upon the ingenuity they had displayed in the manufacture of the speech from the throne. The only tangible point in it—the only point of importance, was that about the cholera morbus; they were not threatened with the reform bill—they were not threatened with foreign and domestic war— they were only threatened with the cholera morbus. Never was there a speech so satisfactorily framed to disarm opposition. There was nothing in fact to be caught but—the cholera morbus.” The duke of Norfolk moved the address in the Lords, but this new acquisition to a protestant legislature, is not likely to tend in any remark- able degree to the eloquence of the house; the principal part of his speech being thus characterised by the newspapers :—‘“ We regret that in consequence of the noble duke being inaudible below the bar during almost the whole of his speech, we are prevented from giving the whole of it, but we believe that the above are the principal points that the noble duke addressed to the house.” Lord Winchelsea delivered a manly and rational statement of the views which actuated him as an independent Member of Parliament :— « He had withdrawn that support which he desired to afford to his Ma- jesty’s present administration. He would honestly and fairly say, that he perceived, the differences said to have once existed between Whigs and Tories were not wholly at an end. He would honestly say, that after the passing of those two great measures, the repeal of the Test and Corporation Acts and of the Roman Catholic disabilities, he had thought that all distinctions of Whig and Tory ceased to exist.” The plain fact is, that the divisions of Whig and Tory, instead of being narrowed, are made wider than ever. The surrender of the Test Act has done nothing. The Catholic Bill has done nothing. For now an interest still more vital, if possible, is declared to be endangered, and the old difference of principle is become still more distinctly one of self- preservation :—“ He (Lord W.) found, however, that one party were now advocating a measure which the other declared would, if conceded, end in the subversion of the equilibrium of the three powers in that consti- tution which was now the envy and admiration of surrounding nations. This was one great distinction. The next was that the great body of that party which was now in power had lost no opportunity of advocating every measure which would have the effect of destroying the connection between the church and the state—(loud cries of “ Hear’’)—a connec- 2 4 Europe, and the English Parliament. [Juny, tion which, in his humble opinion, formed the ground of that great superiority of moral character for which this country had been so long distinguished.”’ Lord Grey was called up by those observations, and made, what he seldom fails of doing, an eloquent and specious speech ; but to the main point of Lord Winchelsea’s, his answer was sufficiently ominous :— “ Now he (Lord Grey) was a Protestant, and a member of the Church of England, which he believed to be the best church in the world ; but when the noble Lord talked of the necessity of an intimate union be- tween that country and the state, he (Lord Grey) was compelled to say he recognised the necessity of no higher union than the protection which was due to that church, to support its ministers in the proper discharge of their duties.” Yet, even this was not enough, end the premier, confident in his strength, gradually spoke out with a plainness which it was impossible to misunderstand :—“If the noble earl meant a political union, if he meant to make the members of the Church of England parties to the support of political power, he would tell him that the church had very seldom exercised that power, with advantage to themselves, and often with great detriment to the public. (Hear.) I trust, therefore, it is not to me that the noble earl imputes hostility to the church. I wish for Protestant ascendancy, but I wish it to be obtained by a conviction of the superior truth of the doctrines of Protestantism, and to be upheld by the exemplary conduct and piety of those who are to expound its doctrines.” We respect the privileges of the House too much, to venture to de- scribe the meaning which those words bear in our eyes. But, we have heard the same words so often from the regular assailants of the Church of England, that we find it difficult to believe that they could have pro- ceeded from a Protestant peer. On this point we shall say no more. The wildest speculation of the present House of Commons will not go the length of breaking down the Church, and thus there will be, at least, some time interposed ; some senator, worthy of the name, may ex- pose the fallacy of the republican dreams of purifying a Church, by destroying its means of existence ; of reforming the manners of a clergy by throwing them into the basenesses, popular compliances, and popular corruptions of a perpetual canvass for bread ; or of purifying the habits of the country, and strengthening the hands of the state, by virtually compelling the clergy to become demagogues, to take an eager personal interest in every party and public change, to be the perpetual advocates for change, and to bring to their new alliance with the politics of the mob, the passions of the enthusiast. Let a clergy be once salaried by the state, and its dignity in the public eye perishes at once. On the first real or fancied emergency in the state, its salary is curtailed ; and this process goes on, until no salary at all is paid, and the clergy are driven to subsist on the precarious bounty of the subscribers to their chapels. The next consequence to which, must be, the shap- ing of their doctrine and style to the doctrine and style of their diversity of congregations ; in other words, the extinction of all national regularity and decency in worship; the advocacy of every absurd mis- conception of Christianity, in its turn; and a crop of Socinians, Deists, and abettors of every new foolery of the populace, until the whole issued in one common tide of infidelity. But the bill is still sub judice. The debate will not take place till a 1831.] Europe, and the English Parliament. 5 period too late in the month for us to animadvert upon it, and we must wait the lapse of time, and the recovered wisdom of Lord Grey. The most remarkable speech of the night, however, was brought out not by the ecclesiastical, but by the political, portion of the Premier’s opinion :— “The Duke of Cumberland said he should not have risen on the present occasion, had not a pointed allusion been made to him by the noble earl, who had chosen to prefer a serious charge against him, of being always adverse to the liberties of the people of this country. He would tell that noble earl, that on this subject he must be permitted to express himself as warmly as he felt, and assert in his place that, if those liberties were endangered, no man there or elsewhere should be found more eager or willing to fight manfully in support of those liberties than he himself—(Hear.) He would ask that noble earl in what public acts of his parliamentary life, for above 30 years, since he had been a mem-~ ber of that house, did he find the proof of such an accusation? His opinion was one which was not new, nor without high precedent—that the safety of our constitution consisted in the just equipoise and balance of the aristocracy, the King, and the Commons of Great Britain. As to the bill proposed to the adoption of Parliament, on the subject of reform in the House of Commons, he thought totally different with the noble earl and his colleagues of its merits. Whenever the time should arrive that the liberties of the people of this country might be attacked, he would be found as eager as any man there to fight in their defence.” From the unsettled and dubious state of British affairs, we turn to the equally unsettled state of the Continent. The great source of diplomatic trouble, at present, is Belgium. The declaration by France that she will, under no circumstance, send troops to support the decision of the “ five powers,” has completely nullified all their proceedings. The most curious feature of the crisis is the offer of the crown to princes of France and England successively. The Belgians desire a republic, and there can be no doubt that a republican government might be perfectly consistent with their prosperity. A large republic cannot subsist in Europe, because a large one must have a great military force, and the first war which raised up a successful general would raise this general intoa dictator. But a republic of the restricted size of Belgium, and protected less by its own force than the interests of its neighbours, might flourish in the centre of empires. Holland had so existed ; Swit- zerland has so existed for centuries, and may so exist for centuries to come. But the monarchs are determined that no republic shall exist te tempt the wayward wills of their subjects, and Belgium is sent to wander to all courts fora king. France has refused the Duke of Nemours, a sage of seventeen. England is now solicited for Prince Leopold, whose brow seems made to have the chance of all the stray diadems, and yet to die . erownless after all. But the prince is a philosopher, and he may calculate that £60,000 a year, paid quarterly out of the British Treasury, is a much more satisfactory provision than the civil list of Belgium, with the certainty of having something to do for it. Whether the prince has re- fused directly or not, the delay is a virtual negative. No man, who is in earnest, hesitates when the offer is a diadem. We shall see Belgium arepublic yet ; not perhaps in the furious form of the French of 1793 ; but gradually assuming the shape of the American States, whose tran- quillity, opulence, active vigour, and growing prosperity, form a tempt- ing contrast to the anxieties of life and nations in the old world. 6 Europe, and the English Parliament. [Juny, Prussia presents the phcenomenon of the most military government, with the most democratic population of the continent. ‘The towns are full of men, intelligent above their rank in life. Education has been widely spread. Literature, though a tardy road to distinction, under a government of epaulettes, is a favourite pursuit, and even the Prussian army contains many individuals of considerable scholarship. Those men cannot look upon the rapidly changing state of the continent, the in- creased power of public opinion, the growing freedom of the tribunals, the privileges of the press, without inquiring why Prussia is not to make her advance like the rest. The promise of a constitution made at the close of the late war is loudly demanded to be realized, and until it is realised, we must expect to hear the demand persevered in. We have at all times disclaimed, and with the utmost sincerity, all regard for the pretensions of mere republicanism. We have uniformly described the spirit of mere innovation, as one of the most fatal of all public evils, as a monster insatiable of mischief, as fostering only the fiercer passions of the furious, the ignorant, and the malignant, and trampling down all the barriers and forms by which time and wisdom have provided for the security of human peace, and the sustenance of human virtue. But if we resist the explosion, which would involve the whole ancient fabric of states in one wild and fiery overthrow, are we therefore to regret that incumbrances should be cleared away, that the spots where corruption and pestilence bred should be purified, that light should be suffered to penetrate into the dungeon? To our conception, there is no finer display in moral nature than this beneficent change, so gradual as to produce no shock, and yet so complete as to leave nothing beyond the limits of its illustration ; this general brightening of the moral land- scape, not with that fierce and consuming burst of light which could only dazzje and inflame, but with that serene and deliberate splendour which, while it clears away the night, approaches in a magnificent regularity of advance that turns its very mists and shades into colour and beauty. Austria has long exhibited the singular contrast of the most sluggish government, with a cabinet keenly alive to every movement of Europe. At home, all heavy, formal, and clinging to obsolete things ; abroad, all eager subtlety and angry suspicion. The genius of the throne is a monk in Austria, a monarch in Hungary, a dragoon in Italy, and a Jesuit every where. Metternich, whose influence began in the famous armis- tice of 1813, that armistice, which broke down the barrier between Napoleon and the world in arms, is the soul of the cabinet; a man of singular acuteness, energy, and knowledge of courts. In all the pro- verbial uncertainty of favour under an arbitrary throne, he has retained his position. He has undoubtedly justified his forturie by his ability. No finesse of diplomacy has been too refined for his sagacity, no change of affairs too unexpected for his vigilance. At a period when the whole political world was charged with storm, he conducted Austria, shat- tered as she was by the French war, through the danger unhurt, and even raised her from decrepitude to exercise a most. powerful influence upon the state of the European world. Metternich is now the acknow- ledged master of European politicians. He is the head of a school in which the first statesmen of his day are not ashamed to rank themselves as his pupils. His system is the acknowledged code of royal policy ; his will is the first consulted in all the meditated changes of nations. He has made Vienna the point to which all the envoys of the continent flock for. consultation. Without his confidence nothing is done ; with 1831.] Europe, and the Enghsh Parliament. ‘ it every thing is attempted. There are now but two powers, the Revolutionary power, still loose, and without a leader—divided, but armed with an irresistible and fiery determination ; and the Monarchical power—vigorous, compact, but insecure of its ground, and ominously conscious of the strength of its enemy. Metternich is the leader of the “Conservative System,” and he at once lords it over Italy and Germany ; keeps the half-republican cabinet of France in awe, and influences the councils of England. This is ambition. But we must own it to be a magnificent and lofty ambition ; it dazzles and fills the mind. Whatever may be our dislike of the principles of this pre-eminent statesman, we must allow that his career has exhibited a singular display of the commanding qualities which transmit a name proudly to posterity. Without holding up either his personal virtues, or his political conduct, as a model to those who would attain the noblest honours of national esteem, we yet cannot contemplate the elevation to which such men have risen, and on which they have sustained themselves in years pregnant with vicissitude, without feeling a stronger consciousness of the vivid and vigorous faculties that may be lodged in human nature. Italy is still disturbed. She has often been compared to her own Mediterranean, alternately the most placid and the most turbulent of seas. But the Italian insurrections have all died away. They were not founded in the feelings of the people; none of the great permanent po- pular interests had been bruised ; the priesthood, the traders, the tillers of the ground, had been untouched by Austria. Even the chief part of the nobles, the most aggrieved class, had been either purchased by mili- tary and civil office, or suffered to indulge in that indolent possession of their opulence, which makes patriotism disappear from the mind. The true depositories of manly thought, the scholars and writers of a nation, are few in Italy, and the few are disunited by provincial prejudice, de- ‘pressed by want of public influence, or chained by pensions. In all countries a pensioner is a slave. The last hope of Italian freedom lay in the worst hands in which freedom ever took shelter ; the broken parti- zans of French jacobinism, the remnant of the corrupt officials of the Napoleon dynasty, the beggared courtiers of Murat, and the infidel dis- ciples of Condorcet and Voltaire. Out of such elements no solid, peace- ful constitution could ever grow. The original evil of its birth must have envenomed and enfeebled every stage of its existence. A Jacobin Italian Republic must have been attended by all the train of its terrible ancestor in France ; it must have been followed by those horrid shapes of confiscation, imprisonment, torture, and indiscriminate death ; that insolence to the throne, and that spoliation of the temple, which to this hour throw their shade over France, and make mankind distrust every movement of her people, as if it were a coming subversion of her throne. But the divisions of Italy, the inveterate mutual scorn of men sepa- rated from each other but by a ridge of hills, or a river—by the differ- ence of dialects, of name, of historical recollections—by the trivial injuries of ages past, which, instead of fading away, have been only darkened by time ; all the weak bitternesses of idle nations—exasperate Italian against Italian, until the general enemy is received as a comparative friend, fixes the fetter on the foolish combatants alike, and, while he indulges in the full power of the tyrant, actually becomes the benefactor. ' [ 8 ] [Juny, SPECIMENS OF CANT, Prison-Rerorm.—Great things are to be done by sincerity and zeal in most affairs of this world, and something is to be done by them even in prisons, hulks, and transportation ; but we cannot endure the per- petual meddling, bungling, and hustling of political friends of humanity ; of bitter and persevering hunters after public influence, through those calls on public feeling; of a little junto of republicans for power, whether they call themselves Irvingites or Wilberforceites, political economists or parliamentary evangelicals, saints of Balham-hill or sinners of St. Giles’s. We see the worldly principle creeping out under the piety; there is some little interest always to be insinuated in the most unearthly smile; some dexterity in the softest squeeze of the sanctified hand ; the lip sigheth not, without a meaning worthy of the Stock Exchange ; and the eye turneth not upon Heaven, without 4 glance upon the things of this, “ alas! transitory existence,” worthy of the chief of speculators in gunpowder, condemned musket-barrels, aquafortis-gin, and East India-liberal-sacrosanct-freelabour-sugar. Non- sense is of course the staple of those orations; and the ignorance, contempt of history, and disregard of consequences, are too charac- teristic to be ever forgotten in the “ingredients of their cauldron.” Society for the Improvement of Prison Discipline—A meeting of this society was held on Monday at Exeter Hall, Mr. F. Buxton, M.P., in the chair. Among the speakers were Dr. Lushington, Sir G. Hanson, Mr. Hoare, and Mr. J.J. Gurney. In the course of the conversation the unhealthy condition of many of our prisons, the evil effects produced by the indiscriminate confine- ment of juvenile offenders with those hardened in crime, the difficulty of finding a secondary punishment consistent with their views, and the superior management of convicts in the United States, were some of the principal topics touched upon. It was also contended that the proper object of punish- ment was the reformation of the offender as well as the prevention of crime, and Dr. Lushington argued that capital punishments were a direct violation of humanity, and repugnant to the Jaws of God. Resolutions passed in favour of abolishing capital punishment, and to institute those which, while they in- flicted pain on criminals, would, at the same time, be likely to advance their temporal and spiritual welfare. Passing over the worn out common-places of those harangues ; the praise of American prison affairs, as if there could be any rational com~ parison between England, crowded as she is with temptations t» pilfering, and loaded witha population of six millions of a mercantile and manufac- turing race; and America, where there is nothing to steal but grass or water ; where the spade is the only thing of value, and the land the only thing out of which a man canlive; America, where every man must be his own tailor, carpenter, lawyer, and rearer of cabbages ; where, if a man devises the stealing of a pair of breeches, he must first slay and strip the wearer, inasmuch as no man, from the president downwards, has a second pair ; where the arts of life consist in planting maize and potatoes, and the luxuries of life consist in boiling them into puddings ; where there are more acres of land than knives and forks ; a looking- glass is a shew that congregates the population of a province ; a picture has never been seen; a saltspoon is a phenomenon which no American traveller, who values his reputation for veracity in the States, has ever ventured to announce ; and it is notorious, that a tea-service of French plate accumulated the unpopularity of the Adamses to such a degree, 1831.] _. Specimens of Cant. 9 that it overthrew that ancient dynasty, and federalism along with it, for ever. But here we have Dr. Lushington, a civilian too, a judge moreover, and a liberal, a saint and a spouter of the first dimensions openly declar- ing in Exeter Change—the largest, the worst built, and, six times a week, the worst filled hall in London—that capital punishments were “ repug- nant to the laws of God.” Did the pious doctor ever look at a law-book, called Deuteronomy ; is he cognizant of the existence of the Mosaic code ; or has he ever been at church, and in some moment, undevoted to Doctors’ Commons, ever by accident heard the Decalogue? We call on the learned doctor to “ eat his words.” Any man, but the learned doctor, might have recollected, that capital punishment is ordained in the inspired code for almost every species of crime, in its deeper grade ; and that it is even appointed for the dis- obedience of a child to its parents, of course, under strong and defined circumstances. Let the doctor then venture to say, if he will, that this code was contrary to humanity, and that such punishments were re- pugnant to the laws of Heaven. Judge, civilian, and saint as he is, he is mistaken. We are by no means hostile to any effort to improve the condition, the minds, or the morals of prisoners. But we are decidedly hostile to the party-style of humanity, the politico-brewery-saccharine- gunpowder-Mauritius molasses-humanity. Mrs. Fry circuits it no more. The annual summer barouche excursions, “ with my brother, my tracts, my tea-kettle, and my patterns for the new prison reforming-cap and pinners,” are at an end. We will not charge the lady with any thing beyond the rashness of attempting objects not merely beyond her means, but which her exertions have in all probability made more remote than ever. But we need not dissemble our delight at any circumstance which might have put an end to her excursions, pleasant, picturesque, and pathetic as they were. We mean no offence to the fair quaker, drab- coloured and didactic as she was ; and still less, if possible, to that wiser, more innocent, and lovelier portion of the sex, who, seeing that nature dresses the fields and skies in beauty, that a star is as sparkling as a diamond, and by parity of reason, that one is just as criminal as the other, and who have never in the course of their travels, heard of a drab-coloured rose, dress the beauty that nature gave them in the colours that creation supplies: yet we avow our belief, that the ladies are not the best propagators of parliamentary reform, prison regulations, evangelical preaching, nor even of anti-slavery petitions. As this‘is the age of “ codification,” we shall, at some time or other, publish our code, enacting that no unmarried lady shall ever display herself in those meetings, but under penalty of her being suspected of having past her five-and- thirtieth year ; that a committee-woman shall be reputed an old maid ; and that “ president or secretary” shall be equivalent to a declaration, that she is hopeless of marriage, even with a half-pay lieutenant of the local militia. We give a specimen of the female-prison-reform accomplishments :— Wants of a Newgate Nymph.—The following correspondence, dated _“ Newgate, 10th of March,” was found on a prisoner who was apprehended. on Wednesday :—“ Elizabeth Brookes,—This comes hoping to find you well. I hear you are out, and am sorry to hear that Tim and you are parted. I hope | you will do what you can for me among the chaps, for, when they were in, they said if I could bring them some baccy they would do the same for me. M.M. New Series—Vou. XII. No. 67. 10 Specimens of Cant. [Juxy, They can have no excuse now, for they can send it by you, and you must come in as my sister. I hope you will do your best endeavours for me ; the smallest trifle in my present situation would be of service, now that I am lagged. I hope I shall have one drunk in Newgate before I go ; I should like a pipe of baccy, a pot of beer, and one quartern of gin, but I can’t get it.—So no more at present from your's truly, “ Mary Harszour, a lag.” We like sincerity even in a quaker, a lord, or a whig; but for our souls we cannot comprehend the sorrows of men, of whatever softness, in having obtained the situations for which they have been struggling for weeks, months, or years. Here is Lord Milton, certainly a good- humoured kind of personage as ever failed in York, and as certainly, a thorough electioneerer as ever worked himself in for any place else, deploring, in “ good round sentences,” his misfortune in having gained the very thing he sought, and which (his antagonist says) he gained by no means in the most courteous mode to that antagonist. Yet, after standing the burden and heat of the day, spending, we may presume, more money than it has cost his noble and very inhospitable mansion in dinners since the hour of his birth, and making speeches with his prohibited surtout off in all weathers; we have him lamenting the result in lan- guage worthy of Charlotte and Werter. One of our contemporaries, who actually believes him in earnest, such is the innocence of man in this nineteenth age, weeps with the weeper. “The address,” says he, “« of Lord Milton to the freeholders of Northamptonshire is, in some of its allusions to the personal circumstances of the writer, a very affecting production. His lordship, says one, ‘ whose bosom is a stranger to joy,’ has been dragged from that retirement which he had devoted to the indulgence of melancholy feelings, or to the charge of domestic and pious duties, and is clothed with a most conspicuous public trust, at a time of fierce and political struggle, into the midst of which he will be forced to plunge by the necessary effect of the obligations thus suddenly cast upon him.” _ Would it be indecorous to ask his lordship, who drag- ged him into this “conspicuous public trust ?” and what but his own cravings laid those responsibilities on him. It will be a long time before the public will receive an answer. The Kirk is up in arms against Irving ; and, at a meeting the other day, to scourge the heresies of this very well-whiskered divine, the Scots anathematized the poor heretic in a style of that various eloquence, which the orator himself has compared to the braying of dogs round a lion of the wilderness. In this parson-hunt, the only doubtful point was as to the intensity with which our unfortunate tall preacher, unde- niably the tallest since St. Christopher of ocean-wading memory, was to be run down. Dr. Forbes moved a resolution, the substance of which was, to tie up Presbyteries from allowing Mr. Irving to exercise his privilege of a Licentiate or Minister in any Church of Scotland till he avowed or denied these doctrines. Dr. Mac Farlane opposed the motion, on the ground that the Assembly ought not fo pass sentence against ~ that which was more like the raving of a maniac than a man of sound sense. Mr. Geddes, of Paisley, regretted that they should ever have ordained a man to insult and blaspheme the Saviour. The Dean of Faculty opposed the motion, as calculated only to advertise such non- sense into notice, which, if left to itself, would sink into insignificance and contempt. The motion, however, was eventually carried by a majority of 147 to 40. 1831.] Specimens of Cant. ll The whole was a brutum fulmen after all. As much a failure as the protocol of the five powers ;” Mr. Collins’s, of Sadler’s Wells, imita- tion of Paganini; Lord Francis Gower’s copy of Canning; Lord Burghersh’s Opera, or Lord Normanby’s theatricals. Irving laughs at their anathema, and well he may. It “ prohibits him from preaching in any church or chapel within the jurisdiction of the Assembly.” In other words, it prohibits a loud-voiced man, with a huge chapel in Lon- don, a rich congregation in London, and a thousand a-year in London, from going back to live on barley-cakes and beer ; to walk the hill-side for five miles in a storm through his ragged and growling flock ; to be snubbed by the elders, and taken to task for every text by the old women ; to preach three sermons a-day, and perform the whole for three hundred a-year. Ergo. They may prohibit till doomsday ; and the more they prohibit, the better for the whiskered heretic. They but sound the trumpet of fame to him; they advertize him; they propa- gate his name ; they spice and cook his follies with the provocations of party spirit; they lift the blunderer into the martyr; beat the drum for his recruits, and give him a commission in the local militia of pious innovators. The man of whiskers would ask nothing better, he could imagine nothing half so good; and if Irving, having succeeded in bringing the breath of the Kirk Assembly to blow him out of their jurisdiction, knows how to use this singular act of luck, he is sure to make his fortune. If our bile has ever been moved in our country walks, it is when we have seen the inscriptions in the country churchyards. Before us has been the luxuriance of the English landscape, the most perfectly beau- tiful, the most touching to the heart, the softest to the eye, the most tasteful, thought-creating, and spirit-solacing in the world. Above us was spread a summer sky, in its diversity of cloud and colour, in its various grandeur, and its rich repose, unequalled in any climate from the Equator to the Pole. Yet at our feet, in the spot, of all others, fitted for the creation of feelings, solemn, deep, and sacred, stares upon us some gross burlesque of feeling, common sense, and common English. Some— “ Tho’ here you been, I’m no more seen.” The sublime of some poetic cobler, who is suffered, by the negligent clergyman, to desecrate the grave with his atrocious doggerel. Yet fulsome flattery is worse to our ears and eyes than bad verse ; and what are we to think of the taste, or the sincerity, that produced the following tribute to that very slippery personage, the late Mr. Huskisson. The man’s death was undoubtedly a frightful one, and the mode of it to be greatly regretted, on the mere ground of its being undergone by a human creature; but “full pride of talents’—* perfection of useful- ness” — illustrious statesman’”—“ most honoured representative,” and such things, are extravagances, which should not be suffered to find their place in the funeral inscription of such a man. What! old, sly Huskisson! the hanger-on of every party which would employ him. Is the history of his share in the free-trade system, or his last scene with the Wellington cabinet forgotten? Let truth be told ; and then let any man. of common understanding ask, what grounds are there for national C 2 12 Specimens of Cant. [Juxy, grief over the tomb of this personage. We wish her ladyship Joan Can- ning, the clever, were applied to for notes on the panegyric :— The Late Mr. Huskisson.—A tablet of white marble, bearing the following inscription, has been erected at Park-side, near Newton:—‘“ This tablet, a tribute of personal respect and affection, has been placed here to mark the spot where, on the 15th of September, 1830, the day of the opening of this railroad, the Right Honble. William Huskisson, M. P. (singled out by the decree of an inscrutable Providence, from the midst of the distinguished mul- titude that surrounded him) in the full pride of his talents and the perfection of his usefulness, met with the accident that occasioned his death, which deprived England of an illustrious statesman, and Liverpool of its most honoured representative ; which changed a moment of the noblest exultation and triumph that science and genius had ever achieved into one of desolation and mourning ; and striking terror into the hearts of assembled thousands, brought home to every bosom the forgotten truth that—‘ in the midst of life we are in death.’” MAXIMS BY A MIDDLE-AGED GENTLEMAN. THERE are two ways of looking at anything remarkable in this remark- able world: if you look at it with the left eye, it is one thing ; with the right, it is another; with both, it is itself or more than itself. An artist, looking even at-an old post by the highway side, will perceive in it something picturesque—a plain man will see nothing more in it than a piece of wood, misshapen and rotten. You may look at things serious and turn them into humour; at things humourous, and they become grave: in fact, there are two sides of everything ; but maximists gene- rally have looked with their favourite eye only on the favourite side of things, an economy of their visual organs which I disdain to imitate ; on the contrary, I shall use all the eyes I have by nature, and shall look as often at the reverse as the obverse of “ things in general. ” Duxt Men.—Blessings be on dull men—I do not mean the dull men who won't talk, but the dull men who will. They are sleep’s physicians —her ministers, preaching peace and sound slumbers to all men. Take an example.—One of this good sort of persons sups with you at eleven, talks at you till one ; you in the mean time compose yourself in your arm-chair, fit your elbows comfortably inthe corners, cross your legs, mix your grog, light your cigar, and resign yourself, like a philsopher, to a late lecture. At two you have perhaps had occasion to say “ Yes,” thrice, « No sure?”’ twice or so; “ Indeed!’’ about the same number of times ; and this is all it has cost you for a soporific, which, made up of medical materials, would come to acrown, at least. From two till half-past two, he is himself somewhat silent: his whiffs and his words come forth like the companions of the ark, two and two; and you observe, without sur- prise, that he is run down. Ina few minutes more, he looks at his watch, and remarks that “ It is time to go”’—that is, he perceives that you are supersaturated with sleep: you persuade the other glass; he refuses it; then you yawn your widest, beg his pardon, and bid him “Good night.”” He goes home, happy that he has been listened to with so much of deferential silence: you stumble up to your chamber, with such an entire resignation to the inevitable necessity of sleep, that pulling off your clothes seems an absurd delay ; and you are off ina minute to the district of dreams, and rise, next day, with no headache, 1831. ] Mawims by a Middle-aged Gentleman. 13 and with a serenity of mind which is unknown to the lovers of clubs and such like noisy congregations of men. But for the senseless prejudices of mankind, such a man as I have described would be “ taken” as wiil- ingly as we take spring physic, and courted, not cut; fora « Blessing goes with him wheresoe’er he goes,’— —the blessing of sleep. Curipren.—If you are a father, prevent, if possible, your daughters from squinting or lisping, and your sons from growing up with caret knees—thus 4—or legs like parentheses—thus ( )—for these defects, if allowed to “ grow with their growth, and strengthen with their strength,” are sure to infatuate them with the stage as a profession. I have assisted, as|the French say, at some few private plays, and never met with an amateur Romeo or Juliet but had one or other of these de- fects in high perfection, if not some one more impossible and provoking. As a general rule, keep your children’s legs straight, and learn them to look right before them, and they may become useful members of society ; reverse the rule, and you make them vagabonds. Warrters.—I always endeavour to be liberal with waiters, and “ such small deer,” and I reckon that I save ten pounds a year by so doing ; for if you will not pay them, they will pay themselves. I get the freshest chops, the best cigars, and a civil good night, with the use of an umbrella when it rains, by this simple expedient: whereas I observe that your niggardly rewarders are always “ to seek” for some one or more of these comforts of life. It is the way of the world, from the peer to the postboy: we serve those persons with most pleasure from whom we derive most profit. AutHors.— Young authors are a very sore race, if you touch one of their faults, though with ever so tender a finger ; I know not wherefore. If aman mount a pedestal to attract notice to himself, we should not wonder if, having a hole or two in his hose, he is told of them by the standers by. Young authors are in general very gluttons of praise, and ostriches in ° the digestion of it: nothing sits uneasily on their stomachs but censure. They will bolt any given quantity of praise you can bring them—“ the total grain unsifted—husks and all.’ But if you adda morsel or so of dry advice, or hint an amendment, phew! the entire gunpowder of their genius is fired o’ the instant,-and beware of the explosion. Yet indis- criminate praise is certainly the ruin of young ability. As there are some men so cynical, that they will tell you only of your errors, so there are others who will only flatter you for your merits, and conceal your faults. This is like praising the cut of your coat, and winking at the hole in the elbow. Secrets.—The easiest way of keeping a secret is, to forget it as soon as communicated. You may have a considerable reputation for confi- dence in this matter, thus easily acquired. The only secret worth know- ing in this life is, how one man contrives to be better than another ; all the rest is mere alchemy. Srerr-praise.—I never believe in the virtues of a man who makes an inventory of them, and boasts of the items, for three reasons: the first is, I can’t. TABLE PROFESSIONS.—I make it a rule not to do more than politely 14 Maxims by a Middle-aged Gentleman. [Juy, listen to second-bottle professions of friendship and proffers of service *« to the last shilling.” It is true, I render myself liable to the suspicion of doubting that the light of a Will o’ the Wisp is not so safe to steer by as that of Eddystone, and that a shooting star is not so sure a guide as a fixed one: but no matter: we are all, every Smith of us, heterodox in some article or other: bottle-friendships and bottle-professions are those in which I have not faith so large as a grain of mustard-seed. I leave them both to the house-maid, to be carried away with the corks when she clears the table, and to be let out at the window when she ventilates the room next day. BisuLous Aacquaintances.—Never proffer your services to see a stranger home who is Bacchi plenus; for after pulling your shoulders from their sockets, in efforts to support him, or rolling you in the mud when he chooses to refresh therein himself, it is ten to one but he charges you with picking his pocket of something he never held in fee in his life, or else abuses you for refusing to see him to his door, though it is five miles further out of your way, and you have convoyed him six. Above all, if he looks married, never see him quite home. I need not explain why. COMPLAINTS OF LIFE.-—Those who most complain of life are those who have made it disagreeable: Some men stuff their beds with the thorns of remorse, instead of the down of repose, and when they lie on them, they roar with the agony they have inflicted on themselves. As reasonably might the ass complain of the thistles which wound his mouth when he persists in chewing them. Those who most feel the load of life complain the least of it. Our sourest disappointments are made out of our sweetest hopes, as the best vinegar is made from the best wine. It were happier if men would hope less, that they might be less disappointed ; but who shall set the mark, and who would keep within it if it were set ? ConversaTion.—In conversation, eschew that poor penny-farthing pedantry of suggesting etymologies, and being curious about the origin of this or that expression. Words are the current coin of conversation ; take them as they are told down to you, and pay them away as they are demanded. It would be as rational for a man to be curious to know through what hands every shilling in his purse had passed, as whence this word is derived, and whence the other. Avoid quotations, unless you are well studied in their import, and feel their pertinence. My friend , the other day, looking at the skeleton of an ass which had been dug out of a sandpit, and admiring and wondering at the structure even of that despised animal, made a very mal-adroit use of one. ‘“ Ah!” said he, with the deepest humility, and a simplicity worthy of La Fontaine, “ we are fearfully and wonderfully made.” In argument, you need not trouble yourself to contradict a positive man: let him alone, and he will very soon do it for himself. Do not allow your friend, because he cannot convince you, and you have convinced him against his will, to compress your nostrils, or kick you out of his chambers, for if you once allow such liberties, there is no knowing what next he may offer at. ee 1831. save [e, Jifadall THE CALENDAR OF KINGS. Tur changes in the various conditions of society have naturally been the old theme of moralists and divines. But if the world goes on as it has been going of late, all our maxims on the topic must be taken from the highest rank alone. In what family, in what village, in what other condition of life have there been so many reverses and changes as among the rulers of nations during the last year, whether from the throne to exile, or from the throne to the grave. Here is a list of one single twelvemonth’s work of fortune and nature among the mightiest of the mighty :— See nt oes as) Charles XK... i va.sreus,e a0, Deposed, Algiers ........+.---++ Mahmoud .............. Turned out. TROHIC: (a 2 s\n = en y Sas Phas ViILD. sexa.e: sniste pci ..+- Dead. Saxony ...........+++ Anthony.......+++++++++ Deposed. Naples.......0+2e0-2++ Francis ..sseeeeeees eee Dead. Belgium .....-+++-ee6- Willian. 2/1 0) .2)d.60) 6s) Deposed: Sardinia ........ «sees» Charles Felix....... Jct.5'? Dead. Brunswick ............ Duke Charles.,.......... Deposed. Greece. .').2.....+.... Capo D’Istrias .......... Resigned. PING oie wa ejoe 6 oes.) WOME COLO I... 5+ 22:0» ..--« Abdicated. To which we must add, with more regret, George the Fourth, by whose decease two crowns were vacated at once—England and Hanover. In this list we have said nothing of Constantine the Beloved—“ our eldest brother,” whom the Poles hunted out of the land with so strong an inclination for catching him ; and whose moustaches are not yet safe from the rebel-razor. In fact, the moustache cause is going downrapidly in all quarters, and the time will soon come, when his Highness of Cum- berland will be the only illustrious wearer of those wild-boarish orna- ments in Europe. In the list we have also omitted the Illustrious of the East, where, however, a throne is too like a pillory, or the top step of the guillotine, to make us wonder at any thing, but that men with heads on their shoulders will take the trouble of mounting it ;—a sovereign a week being the average allowance among the turban-wearers beyond the Indus. ‘A correspondent from the land of the sun thus describes the employ- ment of one of the monarchs ;—“ His Majesty of Lucknow amuses his leisure hours with flying kites ; and, in order that no mistake may be made as to whose kite flies highest, or as to the fortunate wight who leaves his competitors behind him, his Majesty has fixed upon scarlet as the royal colour, and has issued a proclamation to his loving subjects, forbidding them the use of scarlet kites!” The Indian wits say, that his sport is of the most heroic description, and that European kings are, three-fourths of their time, doing nothing but flying scarlet kites, or raising the wind to fly them. The Great Mogul, whose lineaments grace the envelop to every pack of cards, has been fleeced both of power and dominions, and is a mere pensioner of our own government, subsisting upon the grant of a considerable annual stipend ; his authority is vir~ tually confined to the control of his own domestic household, which is extensive, and, doubtless, sufficiently unmanageable. From him we hear at the utmost twice a year ; once, on the occasion of his paying 16 The Calendar of Kings. [ Jury, a splendid visit to the shrine of a saint, a few miles from Delhi ; and again, when he receives a visit of ceremony from our friend the British resident. The once Lord of India is still better off, his Majesty having nothing in the wide world to do, but to eat, drink, and sleep, to live on a handsome pension, smoke his pipe, perfume his beard, flog his wives, and let the rest of the world go its own way. One fool there is, to the scandal of the “ magnificent,” the heaven- born betel-chewers, the brothers of the sun and moon—the bustling king of the Seiks, whom the deluded biographer thus describes :— * Runjeet Sing, the only royal personage under the sky who is a king, either in dignity or policy. He is one of those rare men, whose talents and energies have raised them from the condition of a petty chieftain to the exalted station of a sovereign over a wide and turbulent empire. Endued with vigour of mind and body, possessed of restless ambition, and actuated by unceasing activity, he has overcome all the neighbouring potentates one after another, and reduced them to the condition of humble tributaries ; whilst dissensions and anarchy in the state of Caubul have enabled him to add a slice of that kingdom to his own. The primary object of his policy appears to be, to keep at peace with our government; and this out of a keen conviction of our skill, resources, and military prowess. Such, indeed, is his respect for the latter, that he has endeavoured to introduce our tactics and discipline amongst his own soldiery, and has enlisted a number of French officers into his service, who not only drill, but command his troops, especially on more distant and perilous expeditions.” The king of the Seiks, we foresee, will get his throat cut. How infi- nitely wiser he would have been in following the example of the king of the cards—the Great Mogul! He will be shot in some skirmish; or, if he escape that, be sent to the Houries in a cup of rice milk ; or, if he refuse to drink, be smothered in the medicated smoke of his own hookah ; or, if he be poison-proof, he will be strangled between two Mahomedans, or two pillows. And to this comes his life of galloping, sabreing, hungering, thirsting, brain-besieging, broken-heartedness, beheading, blood-dabbling, and wearing bullet-proof waistcoats! It is not worth the while. Among the mortal memoranda of what we might call almost sove- reigns, are the great generals of our day. Of all the leaders of the battle of Waterloo, but one survives: Napoleon, Blucher, Bulow, and Gneisenan are gone. Of the leaders of the allied armies, since the Mos- cow retreat, all are dead: Kutuzoff, Schwartzenburg, Wrede, the Emperor Alexander, Platoff, and a crowd of other thunderbolts of war. The last memorable death is that of Diebitcsh, who, after rising to the height of military fame by his boldness, vigour, and ability in the con- quest of Turkey, died, a month since, of the cholera, or rather of vexa- tion at the overthrow of his plans for the subjugation of Poland. He was a man of great talent. But so perish the invader of an innocent and unhappy country ! 1831.] E. iad FRENCH COOKERY.* We have seldom seen a good article on cookery ; and we confess that we undertake the task “ with fear and trembling.” Whether we shall “< work out our salvation” or not, it must be the special province of the reader to judge. In order to write on the pleasures of the table, a man must be “ a diner-out of the first magnitude ;” and that in itself is an acquisition of no mean moment: for be it understood that the dignity of dining-out is conferred only on much the fewer number of those that masticate. Various, indeed, are the acquirements, and happy must be the tem- perament, of that man who is formed to be the idol of all good society. In order to be a receiver of dinner himself, it is needful that he should be a giver of dinners to others ; and this imparteth ease, comfort, and all the accessoires which rank, money, and an acquaintance with the best society, can confer and communicate. But, independently of these adventitious aids of fortune, he who wishes to be a choice “ Amphy- trion,”” must be most bounteously endowed, both by art znd nature. From art he may teach the theory and practice of procuring and serving a good dinner ; but he must “ snatch a grace beyond the reach of art,” and comport himself with ease, affability, and good-breeding. To the science of a Beauvilliers, he must add the graces of a Greve, the wit of a Sheridan, and the careless but playful levity of a Hamilton or a Killigrew. Nor is this enough. With the gay he must be thought- less, and with the grave severe. To the one he must needs urge, with all the weight and gravity of argument, the pleasures and advantages of a “ piece de resistance ;” while to the other he is bound to enumerate the more ephemeral and spirituel beauties of a vol au vent, or a paté de Greves. In the canons of cookery, “ one false step” (like the first error of woman) “ entirely damns” one’s “ fame ;” and he who takes salt with his soup, eats with his knife, or “ discusses” the leg of a woodcock, must thereafter be prepared to be excluded from all civilized society, in consequence of such capital atrocities against the code gourmand “ in that case made and provided.” ; Hence the difficulties and dangers with which critics in cookery are beset. It isno easy matter, as our publisher knows, to get “ gentlemen at ease” into harness ; and it is still more difficult to enlist those “ sol- dats du table,’ who seldom or ever become “ soldats de plume”’—com- monly called story-tellers, sometimes led-captains, gentlemen en-tout, and anon jack-puddings. Of a truth, your fellows who “ set the table in a roar” are a most lazy tribe. They live no doubt on the “ fat of the land,” and, like Savage, they think they are not born for the ignoble purpose of ministering to their own necessities. Write they will not, because it is a labour—to ae awd are ashamed ; but they are resolved at all hazards to eat and ink. Of what purpose to society, however, are their feastings and junket- * Code Gourmand ; Paris, 1628 and 1829.— Physiologie du Gofit; Paris, 1829 and 1830.—Cusinier Royale; Paris, 1829.—Cuisine Bourgeoise ; Paris, 1809 ; and 24th edition, 1830. M.M. New Sertes—Vou. XII. No. 67. D 18 French Cookery. [Juny, tings, unless they “ unfold the tale” with which practice has made them perfect, and disclose those secrets of the dinner-table whose mental taste is accompanied by present pleasure, though it may be too frequently followed by pain. The reader will possibly conclude, from these observations, that there are but two sets of persons qualified to be critics in cookery— namely, those who give dinners, and those who partake of them; but of the two, the latter are by far the most useless members of society. He who gives dinners is a benefactor of his race. He is the friend of the butcher, the baker, the wine-merchant, and the green-grocer. The productive powers of mankind are tributary to him; and the animal and vegetable kingdoms are ransacked to grace his board. Sel- dom, however, does the host become the historian of his own exploits, unless in the “ Morning Post ;” and then the tale is told in half-a-dozen lines, full of “sound,” it is true, but “ signifying nothing.” It is merely stated that Mr. Such-a-one, or Lord So-and-so, gave a grand dinner to half-a-dozen persons of distinction—that it consisted of all the delicacies of the season—but what these delicacies were, and in what order they were served, the record is altogether silent. Often, indeed, in England does the butler, or the steward, or the groom of the cham- ber, become the chronicler of the feast in some of the “ broad sheets” with which the metropolis abounds; but he giveth but a “ brief ab- stract” of the fare on which his betters fatten ; and should Ude himself take pen in hand, it is not to be expected that he shall make the unitiated as wise and all-learned as his savoury self. The desideratum, then, is, that some of those who have a thirty- conversation power—whose wit sparkles with the champagne—and whose conversation is as creamy and as current as the best Mousseux d’ Ai—the desideratum is, that some of these persons should put pen to paper. But, alas! with this tribe the great business of the morning is preparing for the dinner of the day. Besides, the gems of the table are as “rare” as they are “rich ;” for, in the course of our lives, we have met but with four such men. Alas! poor Tom Aikin! with all the gay vivacity of George Selwyn —with all the point and polish of Tickell—with much of the wit of Sheridan, and all his ready change of small-talk, why is it that you have retired from your thousand-and-one feasts, without letting forth freely that accumulative current of cookery, which, like the Prepontic, might flow on, and on, “ nor feel retiring ebb?” In ¢hy silence, what a loss has society sustained! ‘Thy lessons might have been directed to all ages and to all nations; for cookery is alike essential to republics and monarchies, to democracies and oligarchies. Cosmopolite she is by nature ; and whether she exercise her powers at Persia or at Paris, she is worshipped by an always grateful and sometimes a wondering world. Yet we are not sure that the rich fruit of thy experience would not require codification and arrangement. To doubt thy knowledge were worse than heresy, but men sometimes become “ fat-witted with drinking ‘of old sack ;’ and if this be sin, all we say is, with good Sir John, « Heaven help the wicked.” But a truce with both episode and apos- trophe ! To cookery, be it said, arrangement is as necessary as to any other of the sciences. We have in our almanacks—in which, by the by, we are 1831.] French Cookery. 19 glad to notice recent improvements—kalendars of the stars and of the seasons, but there is not a gastronomic kalendar of the edible produc- tions of our “ sea-girt” isle among them all. “They order these matters better in France ;” and in that land, according to the words of the song :— “* Vant mieux étre ici bas, Gastronome, Qu’ astronome.” It will doubtless be concluded, from all that we have been saying, that we deem the subject of cookery a most scientific and difficult one ; it is even so; and we are more induced to take it up from the failures of others than from any certainty of succeeding ourselves. ‘Two requi- sites we have, however, for the self-imposed task, which are by no means unimportant. In the first place, we love good cheer most heartily ; and, secondly, it has been our good fortune often to have enjoyed it in establishments not to be despised, not only in France and in England, but in most European capitals. Nor have we been so sen- sual as to have been insensible to all, save the mere animal enjoyment. On the contrary, we have sought in dining the theory of dinner-giving, and all that pertains to those pleasures of the palate, which may be enjoyed without fatigue, and repeated often, not only to the exhilara- tion of the system, but to the prolongation of existence. In order to the giving of a dinner, it is necessary that the Amphytrion should be cognizant of the fishes, meat, poultry, game, and vegetables, which are in season during each month, and on this head the Code Gourmand is full and instructive. January (says the editor) is perhaps one of the most favourable junctures in the year for repasts. In Paris, during this month, beef, veal, mutton, wild-boar, roebuck, hare, grey partridge, woodcock, snipe, red partridge (bartavelle), and black game, are in the greatest abun- dance; and in the vegetable market you find cauliflowers, rich and succulent celery, and the truffle in all its meridian glory. In February, as in January, the beef is fat and tender, the veal pure and white, and the mutton (/e veritable prés salé) full of rich moisture. Though game is not so plenty as in January, yet the scarcity is atoned for in an abun- dance of poultry. March is the month, both in Paris and London, when fish is best, and most abundant ; and when the oyster comes into sea- son. April is only distinguished by its vegetable products, but the young peas and fresh asparagus repair the miseries of thirty days of sterility. May is distinguished, or rather degraded, by that worst of fish, mackerel, and the insipid pigeon ; while June may boast of that best of young birds, a young turkey, French beans, cucumbers, Brus- sels sprouts, &c. Among river fish—always inferior to that of the sea— we may eat, in June, carp, trout, and perch. In the French capital, during the month of July, the veal of Pen- toise is most in use ; quail also is common. ‘To give a good dinner in this month requires the most elaborate invention ; and success in this regard would obtain the host a higher reputation than that of a Lou- vois, a Colbert, or a Condorcet. August is the season of young hares, rabbits, and sucking pigs. In the month of September game begins again to appear, but the birds have not acquired that degree of succulence which, a little later, makes their perfume preferable to that of the rose. In September D 2 20: French Cookery. [Juxy, chestnuts form a culinary resource ; and also those willing artichokes, which, in lending themselves to the caprices of the artiste, now sport it, as a hors-d’euvre ; now shine, as an entremet ; and sometimes (per- haps too often) run a race of glory even with an entrée itself. In October culinary prospects begin to brighten. The sea, in recover- ing from the lassitude occasioned by the heat of summer, flings on its surface the shame-faced and modest whiting, whose début is crowned with an honourable and encouraging success. Beef, too, begins to acquire a respectable and continued rotundity ; and mutton and veal obtain that conscientious appreciation, which, when good, they unques- tionably deserve. In November, fresh herrings first make their appearance; but it grieveth us to think they are not held in just appreciation by the great and little vulgar. Endowed with the most edifying modesty, the her- ring does not glorify himself; but, like the violet, he hides his head, and is only betrayed by his perfume. In this month turkeys arrive at “men’s estate,”’ and may be, therefore, eaten “ at discretion.” ; In December, butchers’ meat, game, poultry, and vegetables, are all excellent. The golden plover and the lapwing again appear, “ pleins de suc et de saveur.’ Thus is Christmas ushered in with circumstances the most favourable—“ aux plaisirs de la bonne chére.” Thus have we gone the round of the whole year, and pointed out the products of the months of which it is composed. The most important task, however, yet remains to us. We have spoken merely of the “ raw material” of “edibles ;” but we have said little or nothing regarding them in the “manufactured” state. It first behoves us, however, to define what'a dinner is. A dinner, then, is composed ef four courses, or, as a Frenchman would say, “de quatre services.” The first course ought to present a solid and obstinate resistance ; because it is sup- posed to be assailed by hungering jaws and a virgin appetite. This course consists of relevés and entrées. The roasts are escorted by sal- lads, as a kind of household troop ; and some complimentary vegetables give us their presence as a kind of honorary body-guard to the second service. The entremets, which grace the third course, appear with an aérial agility, attaining the eminence of the salle d manger, as it were, in a bound, range themselves round some grave and imposing dish, with a courteous acquiescence, and a deep sense of profound vene- ration. After this comes the dessert, “to greet the eyes and glad the heart” of jessamy men and languishing women. It should be observed, however, that the “ hors-d’cuvre” remain on the table till the third course. They are the culinary stone on which the appetite is whetted. Nor must the attendants forget, that at each act of the nutritive drama, the table, like the stage, should be entirely denuded ; but the pause, as Hamlet says, should be “exceeding brief.’ The servants retire after the entremets. At the dessert, each guest serves himself according to his taste ; and those whose views extend beyond their reach, pray their neighbours to lend a helping hand. This is the definition, and these are the maxims in whose spirit it should be demolished. It is needful, however, that we should speak. of the manner in which the matériel should be dressed, and served—that we should say what soups are most sanative—what rotis the most renowned, and what salmis the most seductive ; but previously a grave question arises—should oysters be eaten before soup? The 1831.] French Cookery. 21 customs of St. Petersburgh, Vienna, and Paris speak in favour of this practice ; but our own opinion is, that when one is really sure of a good dinner, the eating of oysters is a fraud on the appetite. At all events these light troops should only be allowed to skirmish in the stomach in small numbers, and their impetuosity should be restrained by a quantum sufficit of vin de Grave Montrachet or vin de Pouilly—or better still by a glass of dry Madeira, Johanisberg or Hockheimer. As to the Chablis— which is drank in France with oysters, for our own parts we have always thought it a petty-larceny liquor. To soup let all honour and glory be due. It is liquid meat ; and if good of its kind would create a soul under the ribs of death. Of soups, according to the best authorities (including Bouillons, Purées, and Potages) there are 127 in the Cuisine Francaise. Of these, however, the best are as follows: Puré des Carottes au Ris, une bisque d’ecrivisses, une potage a la reine, une julienne, aux pointes d’asperges, and un consommé de volaille. Mock-turtle, ox-tail, and hare soup one can have in France, but, with the exception of the latter, they are rarely suitable to our English taste. It has long been a question with us, whether the French or English soups claim the pre-eminence ; and even as yet we are unable to come to a decision ; but theré can be no doubt that the French must bear away the palm on the score of variety, if they do not obtain it on that of ex- cellence. Though it must be admitted that a good.ox-tail is a strong, full bodied, mellow soup, yet it will also be conceded that it is often in Eng- land too highly seasoned, and fitted only for the palates of those whose lives have been gently soddened under a tropical sun. A mock~ turtle soup, when well made, is better, to our taste at least, than a real turtle—and this is a dish which is rarely, if ever seen, in a genuine French house. Mock-turtle may, however, be obtained at Paris, at Mountain’s, an English pastrycook in the Rue Mont Tabor ; and also at Ibbotson’s, a Scotchman’s in the Rue Castiglione. Hare soup is a dish worthy Diana herself. We have eaten it in a rough and home-spun state in Scotland, and found it marvellously recruiting: but we have never found it palmy and perfect except at Paris. There only have we discovered the alembi- cated essence of hares, who had the good fortune to be took on the sunny banks of Valromey, or the heights and fastnesses of Dauphiné ; of hares who, even when grated in the pipkin, gently simmered forth, for “ even in our ashes live our wanted fires,” the satisfaction which they felt at the noble uses to which they were turned. -When, however, we have enumerated the three last-named soups as the products of England, we fear that our “ occupation” is wholly “ gone.” True, one hears of gravy soup and mutton broth, but these are in general so exe- crably bad, unless at the first private houses, that they may be very fitly, and not at all too severely, denominated hog’s-wash. There is another soup (pea), which we hope may last as long as the wooden walls of Old England ; but that is only to be had good on ship-board, and we would almost undergo a tossing in the Bay of Biscay, to obtain such a plate of it as we have had the honour of eating off Douglas, Isle of Man, on board his majesty’s yacht the Royal Charlotte. The soups of France, though not so strong and seasoned, or spicy as those of England, are infinitely more various, light and succulent ; if we except an English white soup made by a first-rate artiste. The French bouillon, too, is generally better, and contains the very soul and 22 French Cookery. [Juy, quintessence of the meat in which the casserole has carefully and cau- tiously performed its duty. All the vegetable kingdom, moreover, is put into play; and turnips, carrots, celery, asparagus, onions, cloves, tomata, cucumbers, lentils, chicorée, chestnuts, and (save the mark !) cabbage, gently meander through and mix with the soups, into which the taste or the caprice of the chef shall fling them. Among the best, if not the best of French soups, we reckon the puré des carottes au ris—so rich, so red, and so racy. How gently does the carrot appear to have insinuated itself into the bouillon, “ incarnadining,” the multitudinous broth, and making the brown “ one red”—orient as the first tint of “ russet-clad morn,” or as the first glow of the gently expanding rose. Ever dear and honoured Laiter, it was at thy restaurant, at the corner of the Rue -Castiglione, that we last indulged ourselves, even to a gentle satiety, (which cheered but did not pall) in a carrot soup. Here is a soupe a la reine not at all to be despised, resembling our white soup in colour, and in a great proportion of the materials it may fairly rival it, if made by a good cook. To those who rejoice in crotiles, we may remark that they are always better managed in France than in England, and that they never in the former country give to the soup, in technical phrase, a colour “ trop ombré.” A purée de gibier is fit for the “ private eating” of any lad among them all; but in order to make it as it should be made, you must put down three pounds of sliced lean beef, four partridges, two pounds of veal, two pounds of sliced ham, a pheasant or éwo, carrots, onions, four heads of celery, three cloves and a small nosegay of fennel. With such materials, it must be your own fault if you have not a good soup. In the matter of fish and in the preparing of it, as well as the dress- ing, the French are inferior to the Dutch and English. Much, but not all of this, is owing to our proximity to the sea; to the number of our sea-ports ; to the fearlessness of our fishermen ; and to the rapidity with which we convey the fish to market. Some of it also is due to our cleanliness, and to the art of crimping, which we owe to Holland. All the larger fish, be it observed, are best when simply boiled. This holds good of turbot, salmon, haddock, plaice, and John Dory. In dressing these one has only to follow nature; no scope whatever is given to the faney or imagination of the cook. Hence the success of the English and the Dutch. The way is plain and straightforward, and lo! they walk in it d@ merveille. Not so, however, with frying: this requires taste and judgment, and accordingly, though the fish be on all hands admitted to be inferior to the English, you eat your whiting and your sole with more satisfaction at Paris, than you do in London. And wherefore? Because your sole frite is more crust, and crisp, and curdy ; more mellow, tender, and full of juice. In truth, it appears ripe, and wears the light brown, autumnal tint of dropping fruit :— “ the embrowning of the fruit (7ead fish), which tells How rich, within, the soul (read sole) of sweetness dwells.” Yet we have never eaten a turbot, even at the Rocher lancale, with the same gusto as in London. The fish in Paris comes a long way by land- carriage ; and land-carriage is “a whoreson destroyer” of your fish. The native of the deep becomes soft and flabby, and a mere starveling to what he was in the sea; and besides a turbot in Gaul is like good words sung to a “ filthy tune.” They give you the fish, which is the 1831.] French Cookery. 23 words, but to the tune of shrimps, and a plague of such sauce say we. In this our land, the custom is different. As the “ sound should be an echo to the sense,” so should the sauce be worthy of the fish, and accordingly, instead of a “ withered apple John” sort of sauce, such as shrimps are, we have the rich and unctuous lobster variegated with a vein of coral. _ Haddock we have never eaten good in Paris: neither have we found it in London comparable to that which we have had in Ireland and Scotland. The sauce for boiled haddock, according to us, is parsley and butter ; and we make the avowal even at the risk of being deemed vulgar. The Rocher luncale is certainly the best sauce for fish at Paris, but all its fish is inferior to (excepting the fried), and dearer than that of London. The larder, however, is excellent, and the wines choice and of a rich bouquet. Itis “ not for nothing,’ however, that we drive down towards the Rue Montmartre, and when the reckoning is paid, it is indeed a “ swingeing sum.” On the subject of fish, then, let us admit that in the quality and in the boiling of it, as well as in the adjunct of sauce, the English are immeasurably superior to the French. We come now to the Entrées, and here the call is reversed ; for the French are immeasurably superior to the English in all the nic-nacs of life. At an ordinary dinner in France, they give you sixteen entrées, in which are comprised a great variety of petils patés, and in which you often find that exquisite dish the fricassée de poulet a la belle vue; the filets de volaille aux truffes, and the filets de faisans a license. Nothing in this nether world can be better than the filets de volailles aux truffes. This precious turbercle, whose unctuous perfume enriches the “ lean earth” in whose bosom it is found (and with which the font becomes saturated), warms the stomach, gives tone to the wearied appetite, and facilitates digestion. The mind itself feels its inspiriting influence. To the pig—which, Cobbett says, has a “ nose as keen as a parson” —are we indebted for this pearl above all price in the culinary art. Columbus himself must give place to the Cochon—for what was the discovery of America, in comparison to the discovery of the truffle? For one single truffle any king of taste would lose America, and be content to lose it. Notwithstanding all that has been said in praise of the pig, he is.a selfish and sensual animal, and a gourmand of the first magnitude. It‘is for himself he scents this pink of perigord, and not for mankind. As civi- lization extends, however, humanity gains the “’vantage ground,” and now we employ truffle hcunds, who on the umbrageous banks of limpid rivers, or in the sweet seclusion of woods, through which brooks mur- muringly meander — snatch the odorous esculent, all sacred to the genius of a spot diversified by the presence of the towering oak—the ever- moving aspen—the sentimental weeping-willow—the white virgin birch, and the tall, stately, and sombre poplar. Entremets are divided into great and small. In the former consist such abominations as a gentle sucking pig, or the glories of a dindonneau or perdraux piqués ; and in the latter are comprised the various kinds of sallads, jellies, vegetables—the petits gateaux turcs, or ceufs poché au jus. ' In London, some years ago, there was a man who went about in his carriage, dressing salads, for which the charge was half-a-guinea: but all the world can dress sallad in France, and the species are more various, 24 French Cookery. [Juny, and better dressed too, than in England. You have a green salad—a sallad of cucumber—a sallad of beet-root with celery, and a salade de chicorée. All these are mollified under the hands of an ingenious and judicious artist by the force of one sage maxim—ZI/ faué avoir la salade bien fatigué. What a word is faligué! How perfectly pure, idiomatic, and untranslateable! How difficult to pay such a ‘coinage of the brain” in hard specie ! Vegetables come in under the head, entremets ; and here, too, French superiority is great. The chour-fleurs au jus and the culs d’artichaux a l'allemande, are significantly tender and nutritive ; but it is in spinach that French science more broadly glares out. The management of spinach is, indeed, a primary test of a scientific artiste, and under the hands of so dear and valued a person, we could dine on spinach any day for a month to come. Of the dessert we shall say nothing, but in the compottes and bons-bons, the Gauls beat us hollow. Among the vegetables we had well nigh forgotten mushrooms—the delightful champignons au sauce blanche, iphich Nero called the flesh of the gods. How smooth and easily do they glide “in tartareo specu!” their transit is soft and velvety to the palate, and the sensation may be compared to treading on a bed of odorous flowers. But we have detained the reader too long from the works under review. The first of these, the Physiologie du Gotit, is the production of Brillat Savarin, and had at Paris a remarkable success. The style is often quaint and humorous; and now and again full of learned conceits. It is a mesne between the manner of our Sterne and Mon- taigne. It is, however, more a theoretical than a practical work. It treats of the senses, of taste, of appetite, of the nutritive qualities of viands, and their chemical effects; of sleep, of diet, &c. Interspersed are various elucidatory anecdotes, and separate chapters are accorded to fish, game, truffles, wines, coffee, chocolate, &c. In such a work of course there must be a deal of surplusage, but we have found in it much that is new: and whith might be profitably introduced into our cookery books, whose barbarous simplicity—for instance, “‘ Take a hare,” “ take a leg of mutton,’—is still persevered in, to the shame of well instructed natives, and to the wonder of all foreigners. The Code Gourmand is a vif and pleasant little work, and may be pronounced perfect in its kind. It treats of every thing concerning the “ Re cebaria,’ and of many other things to boot. We have a chapter on invitations, on the manner of serving, on the guests, on toasts, on table songs (des Chansons de Table), on awkwardness, on story tellers, &c., on the manner of behaving to the persons next you, &c., and there are three long chapters on breakfast, dinner, and supper. Le Cuisinier Royale, is a most useful and practical work, adapted to all ranks. It contains 1,100 receipts, all excellent in their way, and prefixed are nine plates, with designs, to facilitate to the tyro the serving of a dinner of from twelve to sixty couverts. Le Cuisinier Royale is a work which should be in every family. There remains but La Cuisiniére de la Campagne et de la Ville, which should be the manual of good managers. This work contains the practice of carving, simplified by excellent plates. In it may also be found directions for arranging and building a cellar, and rules for 1831.) French Cookery. 25 distinguishing those swindling pseudo mushrooms from the glorious vegetable whose name they assume unlawfully, and without licence of the herald’s college of cookery— from the genuine champignon, our first love in youth and our comfort in old age. - We have now gone through the four works, whose titles are appended to this article. There are many others of a similar kind as excellent in their way, which, at present, we have not leisure to notice. France has always been prolific in such works, while England, on the contrary, ean boast of few. This may be oné reason of the supericrity of the French cuisine, for superior it certainly is. Another reason is, that the French are a nation of diners-out, while we call ourselves a fire- side people, and, as such, only excel in plain roasts or boils. French- men and French women of rank, at Paris, will not scruple to enter the Café de Paris or Laiter’s, while a gentleman in England scarcely ever comes within the walls of a tavern. Hence your British rump steaks, veal cutlets, pork chops, stewed steaks, and other barbarisms, congenial alike to cossack and cockney taste. We are free to admit that among the nobility and gentry in England—among the classes who can afford to give from £100. to £500. a~year to a cook, we meet with all that is “ brightest and best” in cookery; and that sometimes a decent dinner may be had at some clubs; but for the man who wishes for every-day enjoyment—for the rational and tasteful eater, without an over-grown fortune—and who has unfortunately for himself learned the art to live well, and “ cleanly’—for such a man, without a perfect establishment, and for all such reasoning and right royal animals— Paris is the place to have your “local habitation” —and Laiter’s, Very’s, or the Café de Paris, the houses to dine. We had intended to say somewhat on French wines, but the con- sideration of that important subject must be reserved for a separate article. MIRANDA D’ARAGON ; A TALE OF THE INQUISITION. “ ComE, some more wine,” said Miranda. “ Let us drink to-night— to-morrow we may sleep the long sleep.” “ Let us rather to rest,” said Henrico St. Lorent, “ and gather strength for to-morrow’s work. Have you no accounts to settle with conscience, Miranda ?” « Accounts ?—yes ; and that is precisely the reason why I would drink and forget.” ’T was the eve of the battle of Blenheim: the mind of Miranda was overwhelmed by an extraordinary incident. For some days previous, a gipsy woman had pitched her tent amongst the troops, and, in her double capacity of suttler and fortune-teller, had conveyed something to Miranda’s ear which depressed him more than the circumstance of an approaching battle was in itself likely to do. A friendship had been cultivated between Miranda and St. Lorent of no ordinary growth. The former, therefore, after some hesitation, consented to unburthen his mind to his comrade. ; “Tam not your countryman, St. Lorent, nor has my name always been Miranda d’Aragon. I am by birth a Spaniard. I will say little of my wild, passionate youth, but come at once to the subject on which I would unburthen my heart, and claim of your friendship the last M.M. New Serics.—Vou. X11. No. 67. y 26 Miranda @’ Aragon ; [JuLy request I have to make. To fulfil a mother's wishes, I was about to adopt a monastic life, when I accidentally became acquainted with a young lady, who was also to take the veil. The similarity of our fate, the repugnance we both felt at our destined mode of life, drew our hearts together by ties to which persecution but gave strength. By the assistance of a female companion, who beheld with sacred sympathy her mistress’s affection, I contrived to effect her escape, though the poor and faithful girl was left behind. We fled to a solitary valley in the moun- tains of the Lower Pyrenees. I had carefully guarded against any trace of discovery, and heard nothing of pursuit. We lived in this retreat in a happiness known only to those who love, to the forgetfulness of an exterior world. «« But my restless mind was not to be satisfied for ever in seclusion. By degrees I ventured from our asylum to partake of the pleasures of the chase. My imprudence shewed my pursuers the way to our abode. I was watched and discovered. Returning one day across the moun- tains, I looked down from the heights, and beheld with horror our little hut surrounded by soldiers. Isabella was carried off by an escort of troops, whilst others guarded the passes of the valley to secure me. My courage failed. The knowledge of the punishment that awaited the crime of having carried off a noviciate from a convent, rendered it impossible for me to advance. Like a recreant I fled, leaving my poor Isabella to her fate. I proceeded to a frontier town of France, where I met a recruiting party, and enlisted as a common soldier. My know-, ledge of the French language, and numerous acquirements, gained me favour and distinction. I was rapidly promoted ; and, after ten years’ service, obtained the rank of captain; and should have, perhaps, con- tinued to advance, had not an extraordinary circumstance happened, which overthrew my schemes of ambition, by holding out to me again the phantasm of love—a feeling to which my heart still clung. “ In a skirmish with a squadron of the enemy, I was dangerously wounded, and left behind at an obscure village till I recovered. As I lay helpless in inexpressible torments on my bed, I prayed Heaven to give me relief, or instant death. A gipsy woman, named Zagurina—the lame hag who sells provisions in our camp—inhabited a shed of the house in which I lived. She had with her a remarkably fine, half-grown girl, who to me appeared an angel. She seemed to attach herself to me, and I felt such an interest in her, that her presence alone contributed to my convalescence. An indescribable sensation of delight took possession of my soul whenever she was near me. The old woman appeared to regard my attachment towards my young nurse with pleasure, though she always kept at a distance herself. Scarcely, however, was I restored to health, when she came one morning into my room, and said she was obliged to take her leave of me! I heard these words with grief and dismay ; for I could no longer live without the child, and, intreat- ing her to leave her with me, I threw down a purse of gold. *«* No, Sir,” said she, looking kindly at me, ‘I do not sell my child; but, on condition you will behave to her like a father, she may remain with you. In the course of time, I will return to claim her.’ « Ashamed of my offer, I put away my gold; gladly promised every thing that the old woman required, who then left us. At first, the girl’ was in great distress at finding herself thus forsaken by her mother ; but my caresses tranquillized her, and she became glad.of my affection. She 1831.] A Tale of the Inquisition. 27 filled up the dreadful chasm in my heart, left by Isabella, whom I some- times thought of with the utmost anguish. I had no other idea than that of always keeping the girl with me, and contemplated with trembling the moment of the gipsy’s return. This made me form the resolution to make her irrevocably mine, and to hide her from the world till a fit period should arrive. In a retired spot I have brought her up, where the heart I have moulded is now being cultivated, and in which I yet hope to find that peace and happiness which is the principal object of my life.” Xe And yet you have a second time left all that is dear to you,’ Henrico, “to follow the-tumults of a noisy camp !” «« The love of glory, I confess, has again roused my dormant passion for a soldier’s life. I cannot lose the opportunity of acquiring fame. She whom I adore will not regret to see me return covered with honours. I will then make her mine for ever, and to peace and tranquillity conse- crate the remainder of my days. Could I but destroy the recollection of the past, my happiness would be without alloy; but the gipsy who infests our camp has got possession of a secret of mine. She comes from Spain to be a spy upon my actions, and she will cause my ruin; but the spectre shall be driven away before my nuptials.” Henrico promised to see the gipsy, and to endeavour to make her give an account of herself. “Good,” said Miranda, “ but to my purpose, and I shall go into battle with a lighter heart. You are rich and independent, and will most likely, when the war is over, retire from the service ; promise me then, by the friendship you bear me, at the conclusion of the campaign, to en- deavour to find out Isabella, and to make my peace with her. I can never return to Spain more!—promise me this, and you will restore peace tomy mind. Take this ring the gipsy gave me—it was once Isabella’s ; wear it on your finger, ’twill remind you of your promise. And now touch cups, comrade ; here’s to a happy meeting after the vic- tory !”” Henrico slowly placed Isabella’s ring on his finger. At this moment the gipsy peeped through the curtains of the tent. « Welcome! hag,” cried Miranda, “ you come in right time!” The tent was quickly opened, and the gipsy dragged in. «“ Now,” cried Miranda, “ I will penetrate the inmost recesses of your heart, or tear your secret from your bosom !” “ That would help you little,” replied the old woman, “ but what do you wish to know from me?” “Where got you the ring you slipped on my finger yesterday, and wherefore pronounced ye a certain name so earnestly ?” « Sir!” replied she, “ I stole neither ; they were, however, lost, and I think that I have brought both jewels back to the right master.” “ I want not your presents,” said Miranda, “ but do not drive me to extremities ; tell me who you are, and what you know of me?” * We will exchange inquiries,” said Zagurina, “confess to me, and I will then answer you. What have you done with my daughter ?” “ Juggler, she is nothing more to you,—she is mine! nor shall you ever initiate her into your scandalous profession |” That is no business of yours,” said the old woman, “I earnestly request you will deliver to me my daughter.—I, her mother, reclaim her from you.” ? said E 2 28 Miranda @’ Aragon ; [JuLy, . Miranda laughed with bitterness. “No! we will not push matters so far ; the girl is mine, and no power on earth shall take her from me !”’ « Give her to me!” said the gipsy, “ and I will permit you once more to contemplate this eye,’’ drawing a morocco case from her bosom, and presenting it to him open. Miranda snatched the picture from her hand, stared wildly at it, and the name of Isabella escaped his lips; but he threw the miniature from him with horror, and seizing Zagurina, he exclaimed, “ Confess, sorceress, where didst thou learn my fatal history ?” « Sir, you are mortal,” said she, with great earnestness, “ your lips may to-morrow be closed by the seal of death, I therefore here first re- quire of you intelligence of my child ; if you refuse it, I will go hence and seek other interference. The whole camp shall know who the fugi- tive Miranda d’ Aragon is.” “No! I will free myself from your clutches !’? Upon this, Miranda drew his sword, and in his rage would have pierced the gipsy to the heart, had not his arm been withheld by Henrico. At this moment an orderly entered the tent to summon all the officers to head quarters, to receive their final instructions for the battle. Za- gurina recovered herself, and said .to Henrico, “I thank you, Sir; he would not have killed me! He only thinks I wish to deprive him of my daughter, but he does not deserve the child, and is a stranger either to love or fidelity. I have, besides, a sacred right to inquire what is become of her. You are the friend of this arrogant, haughty man; I entreat you to procure me news of my child; the peace of many hearts depends upon it, and I do fear a something dreadful to think of !” Henrico was somewhat revolted at the violent conduct of Miranda, but the orders to assemble at head quarters caused the party to sepa- rate. The battle commenced on the following morning, along the whole line. It proved a most destructive day; victory deserted the French banner, and many a gallant Frenchman’s breast was trodden on by the mettlesome hoof of the war-horse. As Henrico rode hastily across the field, he observed at a distance a woman kneeling beside a wounded man, and recognised him to be his friend Miranda bathed in blood: near him was the ‘gipsy tearing her hair. On discovering Henrico, she stretched out her hands and called to him, imploring his assistance, but he durst not remain—he was obliged to push forward, and was denied the satis- faction of closing the eyes of his dying friend. The obstinacy of the battle had cost the French many lives, the army required recruiting ; officers were’ consequently despatched into the in- terior of France to procure recruits: Henrico was amongst the num- ber. In this pursuit he entered a small town, situated on a chain of wooded mountains near Bagneres. Here a fine young man he had en- listed made his escape: -. He employed every means to discover the de- serter, and went himself, with a party of his men, into the mountains in search of him. Every spot, every ravine, every hut was examined, and on perceiving a neat little cottage in a distant valley, he proceeded towards it with the same intention. Two females dressed in eagenning sat under the shade of a large chestnut tree before the door ; they peared much perplexed as Henrico approached, and whilst “the elder seemed to be remonstrating with the younger, the latter advanced to the officer and asked him with an air of inquietude what his wishes were? 1831.] a Tale of the Inquisition. 29. « Do not be uneasy, young lady,” said Henrico, “ we will not be very troublesome to you, our visit is but short; we are only in quest of a de- serter, and must beg permission to search your house.” ‘«« That is what I suspected,” said the young lady, “ and precisely on that account I wish to speak a few words to you alone !—I will spare you the trouble of search,’’ said she, tremblingly, “ and frankly confess to you the young man is concealed in this house, but you will not easily discover his place of concealment !”’ Henrico misunderstood the girl, and answered quickly, “he did not wish to withhold the reward” The young girl looked at him earnestly, her cheeks reddened with a deep blush; then, after a pause, she continued, “I hold you to your word, and though you have misunderstood me, I require a-high price.” «© Well, and what is it 2” « The freedom of the youth !” «“ Oh!” said Henrico smiling, “that is going too far, my lovely girl ! Your lover must come forth, otherwise I shall begin the search, and may probably in the end carry off his sweetheart too !” The girl stepped proudly back, and said, with warmth, “I have no connection with the fugitive; if I have built too rashly on your gene- rosity, ‘tis owing to what he related of your humanity.” * That is well! but in this affair, I may not act according to the dic- tates of my heart, but for the good of my country |” “ Good,” said the girl ; “if you have that in view, I will soon convince you that the country is as much in want of good citizens as of good sol- diers!’”’ She then related how the young man had brought upon himself the hatred of one of the magistrates whose oppression he had en- deavoured to resist: how he and his family had, in consequence, been reduced to poverty: how two brothers had been already sent to the army, and he, the last-and only support of his aged parents, just on the point of presenting them a daughter-in-law, was almost torn from the altar to be given up as a recruit, merely to gratify the spirit of revenge. She described with tears in her eyes the wretchedness of the parents, and the forsaken bride ; and concluded with the assurance that had he not accidently come to the cottage, she would have sought him, to im- plore the freedom of the youth. Henrico listened with attention, then walked hastily up and down. “ You may be in the right, dear girl, at last,” said he, “ but the man has been publicly delivered to me, and I cannot be privy to his escape.” _ © I know how tomanage that also,”’ said the girl ; “suppose he could find two substitutes ; he has assured me he knows many who would wil- lingly be soldiers if they could get a good bounty.’ “ Yes, if he can substitute two fine young men for himself I will dis- charge him. But, as he is poor, how will he procure the bounty ?—I suppose from his lovely mediator !’’ «“ No,” said the girl, and her eyes filled with tears, —But you dashed Isabella's picture to the earth,—you wanted to murder me! I then prayed to God he might terminate your existence on the field of battle !—Heaven seemed to have heard me; I saw you fall !—No danger withheld me from seek- ing you amidst the ranks of death, to explain the secret of the birth of your child, and to request from you the avowal of her residence. But you were already senseless, and the enemy tore you from me. I myself remained a prisoner, until the peace ; I then hastened back to Spain, and to my astonishment found you here beneath the habit of a monk. All might have been happily explained, as fate had also conducted your child hither: Alas! at the very moment I thought of bringing you to- gether, you were sitting in judgment on your children !” «Qh! my poor innocent children !’’ cried Miranda, in despair: “ yes, I loved the child to distraction, though I did not understand the source of the affection,—I see it now ; I beheld in her the youthful image of Isabella !”” Isabella implored of Miranda the life of her child, but he sat with clenched hands ; his head sunk on his breast :—he sobbed bitterly. Isa- bella begged him even to hazard his own life to save their child. His faculties at last seemed to resume their energy; he exclaimed “I will 1831.] a Tale of the Inquisition. 39 _ save her, or perish with her!” Without another word he hastened from . the convent to the palace of the Inquisition. Pale and haggard he entered the chamber of the grand inquisitor, to which he had always free access, and begged a private audience. The inquisitor complied with his request, astonished to see him, so uniformly cold-hearted and taciturn, in such violent agitation of mind. Since the feelings of a father had taken possession of his breast, and that he la- boured to save the life of a child, he was animated amidst his despair with the purest feeling. He related to the grand inquisitor the princi- pal circumstances of his life, without the least disguise ; and accused himself with a soul-harrowing frankness, of being the only criminal. When he had finished his story, the old inquisitor held out his hand to him, and said, “ Unhappy father ! thy child is nevertheless lost !”” Miranda clasped his knees, and implored him in deep groans to save his child!—but the judge remained inexorable. “ The sentence once pronounced by our tribunal, cannot be revoked !’ said he, loosing him- self from the grasp of Miranda. “ You have yourself accused your daughter to us: acknowledge therein the wise dispensation of Heaven. Her death must be the atonement for your and Isabella’s sins.” “ Venerable father !” cried Miranda, distracted, “ if a victim must be sacrificed, let me die.” “ No! thy trials are not yet at an end. _The more pure and innocent thy child is, the more tranquilly shouldst thou view her career finish. I once myself considered death a punishment, but now see that it is only the road out of darkness into light—only the sun’s ray, in which the ripe fruit falls.” Miranda saw that it was impossible to save his child. The grief which had overwhelmed him gave place to the most furious rage. He drewa dagger from beneath his cloak, and swore he would deal death and destruction around, ere his child should perish by the hand of the execu- tioner. The grand inquisitor left him with severe threats, and desired his people to keep an eye upon him, and not to permit his entrance to the palace of the inquisition till the auto-de-fé of the morrow was over. In the agony of Miranda’s grief at not being able to save his daugh- ter, nor make himself known to her, he went to the confessor appointed to attend her, intrusted him with the secret of her history, implored him to relate it to his daughter, and reconcile her to her unhappy father. The priest promised, and kept his word. At length the morning dawned which was to witness the appalling scene of death. The Spanish court in full state, and the greater part of the population of Madrid, were assembled in the Plaza de la Inqui- sicione, to witness the tragedy. The stern Judges of the Inquisition were in their places, and even Miranda did not fail to be present. The old grand inquisitor fancied that the father had, by a severe struggle with himself, at last conquered his feelings, and smiled graciously upon him ; but he could not help shuddering at the dreadful look Miranda returned. At last the procession approached under a strong military escort ; in the centre were the condemned, who advanced in mournful silence ; quite the last was a female, too weak to support herself, con- ducted by the officers of justice. It was Mira. But scarcely had she reached Miranda ere he rushed among the guards, like a lion deter. mined to defend his young; dashed the officers aside, seized his child in his arms, pressed forward with her towards the crowd, calling out to 40 Miranda d’ Aragon ; a Tale of the Inquisition. (Jury, them to save her from the hands of the executioner! But the timid populace remained quiet. Inthe mean time, prompted by the grand Inquisitor, the guards sprang forward and attempted to separate the father and daughter. But her tender hands were riveted round his neck. In a fainting voice she cried—< Kill me! ah! kill me, my father!’ Miranda imprinted on her pale forehead his first—his last paternal kiss, and drawing forth his dagger pierced the trembling vic-~ tim to the heart! She sank on the ground !—From her bleeding corse was torn another victim, who, despairing of her release, had, on resoly- ing to perish with her, arrived but in time to witness the sad catastrophe of a daughter imploring death as a boon from the hand of him who gave her life! S. B. ON THE POPULAR LITERATURE OF FRANCE. Ir is a common-place remark, that revolutions in literature are no less frequent than those in politics, and that it is not less subjected to the capricious dictates of fashion than painting, music, all the imita- tive arts, even dress, whose strange and ephemeral changes bafile all attempt at analysis. This proposition, as applied to the history of France, appears completely established by the facts and writings, from the origin of the fabliaux and the Romande la Rose, to those later days, when the despotism and literature of the empire fell with its glory. It was then that the symbols of unity, the dogmata of passive obedience and adulation, reflected from the political on the moral world, gave way to that burst of frantic independence which English writers have qualified as intellectual eccentricity. It is not here our object to seek to appreciate this change by the merit of its productions. We have only to draw from it, as from those which have preceded it, this deduction, that old age affects books even more rapidly than men. With a few exceptions, easily enumerated, there are, in fact, but few writers who do not survive their works. Twenty-five years is the utmost mean of immortality they can promise themselves. The most successful then obtain an honourable place in libraries, where they are treated like those gothic pieces of furniture which the beauty of their workmanship preserves from destruction, and which are col- lected and preserved, unused, by the curious. Are all the productions of the press inevitably subjected to these vicissitudes? Do the lower classes of them take part in this progres- sive movement? Does what may strictly be called national literature take its colour from popular literature? The impartial examination of the strange productions, a selection from which we shall present to the reader, will answer these questions by proving the immense -difference which exists between these two species of literature. No one in France has hitherto bestowed any attention on the bibliography of the lower classes, which, however, is deficient neither in interest or importance, since the aphorism—* Tell me what you eat and I'll tell you what you are,” might be applied with much more propriety to the reading than to the food of the people. No researches, not the slightest notice has been made on this subject, which appears to have been thought unwor- thy the attention of the busy idleness of the academies. From Sorel to La Harpe, all the critics have affected not to be aware that their porter _ could read, and that their cook sought news of missing forks and strayed ~ 1831.] The Popular Literature of France. 4] lovers from the cabalistic pages of the Grand Albert. The example, however, of foreign literati was not wanting to induce them to tread in a new path, and to rouse them from their indifference. In Germany, a grave bibliographer has made the popular literature of his country the subject of profound researches.* The north has distinguished itself for its zeal in discovering those literary monuments of former ages, which exist only in the tradition of the writer’s fire-side, and in the memory of the villager and peasant. And very lately, an English author has published a most curious dissertation on the Nursery Rhymes, with which, from time immemorial, nurses have soothed the cradled infant to sleep. These works, which would be sufficient to establish the importance of the plebeian muse, might naturally excite astonishment at the dis- regard shewn to it in France. And, on the other hand, if the number of initiated were sufficient to establish the merit and importance of a class, if the principle of majorities could be applied in appreciating it, _if a writer's first object should be the number of his readers, there can be no doubt that this disregard will meet its full condemnation from a consideration of the facts which we shall now attempt to describe. If we considered only the number of works, the names of which appear during the last fifteen years in the Journal de la Librarie, and which, from their price, and the subjects to which they relate, appear doomed to be inaccessible to the common people, we should be tempted to draw perfectly opposite conclusions from these premises. The fol- lowing are the numbers :— BONG C22, petal los. cedueaadvecetsst. 3,357 ISG Soesbi. te Teoest Poot O58 3,763 Llivmetee preety iO PA Bal ane 4,937 Ch Sey BAM RR OB ani ul ey ot . 4,837 MAD, 2508. Fas le eegeel ty Re aan . 4,568 OG. Sear id ss FLA oS a. a eGGeee 4,881 RDI 32 Shea a5 gait O64: Ke AS .. 5,499 so EEE ScGuy Pi HE SOR 5,823 Ween rae Taree. eek ei ee. veeeee 5,893 Moe yey, 222,22 Susser P, S240, 6,974 BOG ch sha. JARS Su: 3 , boyes 7,605 ee ee SP ne sr, § asd 2, O273 DT Paes Lye Meleealdyg Sree) 19 8,198 BOM, 2P3 SEA hae PPro. Bee. 13a. bs F616 RTT pe ot en Mele as sagas 1830 @eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeteeereeeeeene 6,739 96,086 Of these 96,086 works, one-fifth are in one volume, two-fifths in two volumes, one-fifth in three or four volumes, and the remaining fifth is composed of reprints, containing from fifty to eighty volumes, of which 5,000 copies were printed. * The popular works of Germany, or exact appreciation of the small works on history, medicine, and meteorology, which chance has preserved among the people to the present time, by J. J. Geerres, Heidelberg, 1807, One volume 12mo., con- taining the analyses of forty-eight popular works. M.M. New Series. Vou. XII.—No. 67. G 42 The Popular Literature of France. [Juny, It will be inquired how these productions of human thought are distri- buted ; still bewildered by those who three times a-year talk pathetically of the progress of science and the diffusion of knowledge, we naturally expected to see those beneficent works, whose pure morality secures for their authors medals and crowns of virtue, penetrate into the inmost re- cesses of the remotest hamlet of the kingdom! Alas, we are thunderstruck on seeing within how small a circle is circumscribed the influence of those works, which were intended to regulate the heart and mind of all the tax- payers of the eighty-seven departments. The common people, and more particularly those residing in the country, are in general slaves to an instinct of routine, which is carried to a point of invincible obstinacy. They are doggedly attached to what is old, and reject without discrimi- nation, without even examination, every thing which wears the least appearance of innovation. To read any other book than that which from their infancy they have seen tossing about in the dust among the consecrated palm-branches and rusty firelocks, would be an achieve- ment far eclipsing those of Cook, Magellan, or Columbus. So in other provinces, variable as is the taste in dress in France, the peasants’ hair has hardly yet abandoned the costume of the good old days of Louis XIV. This will enable us to judge what progress can have been made by the multitude in an art, the first effect of which is to cause a reaction in domestic life, by the improvements which it reveals and teaches us to introduce there. Philanthropic societies have thought to remedy these inconveniences, by voting books calculated by their form and price for popular circulation. These books had two great faults. They were rational, and were distributed gratis. Now the honourable class of readers of which we are now treating, will almost always say—“ I choose to be deceived,” as the wife of Iganarelle said—“I choose to be beaten.” Whether the year be good or bad, it must always have its quota of trifles and prophecies, which it would look for in vain in the works so lavishly distributed, with a zeal laudable indeed, but quite inexperienced. Hence, during the administration of M. Decazes, alma- nacks, published by government at 33d., and which, in order to secure the circulation, were even delivered to the public at 23d., were scouted with unanimity by the catechumens of the Messager Boiteux. The Société Elementaire failed in a similar manner in 1827. They could not persuade any one to take their almanacks. The common multitude look with distrust on these publications, simply because they are given away ; they are filled with some vague idea, that the real spring of this bounty must be some dangerous spirit of proselytism. It is a repetition of the story of the fellahs of Central Africa, who, not conceiving the possibility of the mere love of science inducing men to expose them- selves to the dangers of long voyages, saw in the emulators of Mungo Park, Laing, and Clapperton, only magicians or treasure-hunters. The French peasant, in fact, only values what he has paid for; and in this respect they imitate the politician, who willingly makes a sacrifice to subscribe to works which interest him, and does not even deign to cast his eyes on those with which an obsequious perseverance is con- tinually loading his table gratuitously. In England this mistrust would be in some degree justified by certain precedents, which prove that almanacks were often employed as the medium for opposing or propa- gating such principles as appeared to be hostile or favourable to the existing powers. James I., for instance, paid marked attention to these 1831.] The Popular Literature of France. 43 works, and even deigned himself to revise the manuscript of the Merli- nus Anglicus, and to promise to his loyal subjects a prosperity which, were it but for his credit’s sake as an astrologer, he ought at least to have realized. His successor, affecting an implicit belief in the same speculations, prompted, but, alas ! in vain, the voice of the same oracles. Thanks to the Company of Stationers, who had obtained from the uni- versity the monopoly of this branch of industry. The usurpation of Cromwell was by no means deficient in that devotion to the moon and stars which had characterized the preceding reigns of legitimacy. These heavenly bodies enjoyed in peace their full moral and political influence, until the beginning of the eighteenth century, when a terrible annihi- lator of magicians arose in Swift. His efforts, however, were fruitless when opposed by ignorance and routine. John Bull did not lose his confidence in the almanack ; and during the wars of the republic and the empire, Napoleon was regularly killed every year by Poor Robin. About the same period the French government included the almanacks in its solicitude for the productions of the press; and every one knows the story of the luckless editor, who, by order of the Directeur de la Librarie, was compelled to transfer to St. Petersburgh the plague which he had unthinkingly predicted to the territories of the ro: de Rome. The Restoration left the almanacks in peace, subject only to the general formality of the depét ; and it was not until 1830 that the Double Liegeois, printed at Paris, by M. Stahl, was seized on account of the following passage :— “Those most disposed to indulgence will be compelled to admit the conviction, that nothing can go on in a system in which words and deeds are in direct opposition to each other.” The date of this prediction renders it remarkable. It was fixed for the 25th July. Doubtless this is a formidable argument in favour of the infallibility of the Double Liegeois, but it must be admitted, that almost as much magic science was required to foresee and punish the offence by antici- pation, as to commit it. It, however, is not less true, that if the uneasi- ness which a publication may occasion to those in power, be in proportion to its influence and the number of its readers, no work ought to occupy the attention of government more seriously than the almanack. The almanack is the basis of the popular literature of France. In some departments they form the whole library of seven-eighths of the population. And what almanacks! Barbarous imitations of the sooth- sayer of Basle, with his Oriental fatalisms, his absurd prognostications, and his meteorological calculations, in which, as in the time of Dubartas, the sun is designated as le duc des chandelles. Then come the medical prescriptions, in virtue of which, doses sufficient to kill a squadron of cuirassiers, horses and men, on the spot, are administered to the most debilitated patient. It would be almost impossible to ascertain the number of the alma- nacks with which France is annually inundated, by the speculators particularly devoted to this branch of commerce. This impossibility arises from the extent and irregularity of their production, and more es- pecially from the profusion of spurious editions. We can therefore only assume, as the foundation of an approximate calculation, the result of the operations of the great centres of production. Thus, Troyes, Rouen, Paris, Beauvais, Lille, Montbelliard, Epinal, Nantes, and Limoges sup- G 2 44 The Popular Literature of France. [Juuy, ply a mass of Matthiew Lansberg, which may be estimated at nearly three million copies. Troyes alone supplies one-sixth of this number ; and the beginning of this fecundity is lost in the remote obscurity of the history of almanacks. Its existence may be explained by the cheapness both of labour and materials, two conditions indispensable to the success of speculations which depend on so small a profit. In this respect, Paris would appear to be in a less favourable position ; yet it furnishes a sup- ply nearly equal to that of the second capital of Champagne. The average yearly sale of the Double Liegeois of Stahl, is from one hundred and thirty to one hundred and eighty thousand ; and that of the Astro- logue Parisien, published by the widow Demoraine, and Boucquin, suc- cessors to the celebrated Tiger, at the Pilier litléraire, is still greater. The last mentioned work, conducted with a bonhomie frequently not destitute of spirit and talent, has evidently the advantage over its rivals, although, or perhaps we may say, because, it concedes something to that thirst for prophecy, which is the generic character of its readers. But, united with these characteristics, which are essential to its existence, we find rules of conduct full of wisdom and reason ; medical and meteoro- logical hints, founded on just observation; a table of the penalties attached to the crimes most frequently committed by the common peo- ple; and a summary of political events, in the form of an annual register. The number for 1831, however, we may observe en passant, has one remarkable peculiarity: following the example of certain reports, which may, perhaps, be hereafter taken as the basis of history, it gives an account of the expedition against Algiers, without even naming the ge- neral who commanded it. Thus, good traditions are preserved.—* God is great,” a Turk would say, and we are very little. But the other day, history was mutilated in a similar way, and the extreme verge of absurdity passed, in order to metamorphose Napoleon into the Marquis de Bonaparte ; admirable device of those saviours of monarchy, who, triumphing even over Chinese apathy, would find means to create an opposition, ventas, the Burschens-chaft and barricades at Pekin, and drive King-li out of his capital with pitch-forks, if the cus- tom-house of Canton would ever allow them admission into the Celestial Empire. In addition to the cities we have mentioned, there are numerous places in which almanacks are made specially for local purposes ; such as indi-« cating the fairs, agricultural directions, and other particulars, which vary in each department. Then the double Matthiew Lansberg has not lost its old supremacy. It is to be found in all the provinces, reprinted, in every direction, except at Liege, whose name it still insidiously bears. Not that this veteran of popular literature no longer exists; a great number even are printed on the banks of the Meuse ; but the elevation of the price limits the exportation in France. It is there seen flanked with venerable marks of authenticity, and adorned with the portrait of the illustrious mathematician, holding in his right hand a celestial globe, which he is examining with the contemplative air of a gastronome pur- chasing on trust the deceitful cantaloup. Independently of its details in domestic and rural economy, and chiromancy, it contains the cele- brated Calendrier des Bergers, also called the Almanach des Anes, where signs and figures are substituted for letters, for the benefit of those who have not fathomed the mystery of reading. Nothing is more curious: than the hieroglyphics and drawings of this popular Keepsake. A pitch- 1831.] The Popular Literature of France. 45 fork indicates the time for manuring the ground ; a pair of scissars, that for cutting the hair ; a fan is heat; a covered pot, cloudy weather ; a pot overturned, wet weather; and an owl, piercing cold. These cyphers, joined with figures corresponding with the order of the days of the week, point out the various labour to which each is to be consecrated. It is, in fact, the infancy of art, and we may easily believe that this calendar has remained stationary since the sixteenth century, when it was in high fashion. It is mentioned, among others, in a work of that period, containing minute details of the interior life, which might be envied by the novelist of Abbotsford. The following fragment relates immediately to the subject of this paper, as it enumerates some works which have now fallen into the domain of popular literature :-— «In the parlour of the house (for to have two is only the privilege of grandeur) is the stag’s horn tipped with iron, and suspended from tne ceiling, whence hang caps, hats, leashes for the dogs, and the great chaplet of paternosters for common use. On the dresser, or two-storied buffet, lie the translation of the Holy Bible, made by order of King Charles V., Les quatre fils Aymon, Ogier le Danois Melusine, and the Ca- lendrier des Bergers. Behind the great door are a number of long and high perches of hung game, and at the bottom of the hall, upon shelves fixed to the wall, half a dozen bows with their quivers and arrows, two good large rondelles (shields), with two short broad-swords, two halberds, two pikes twenty-two feet long, two or three coats and shirts of mail in a small chest filled with bran, two strong cross-bows, and in the large window over the chimney, three hocquebutes (which we must now call arquebusses). Near it is the hawk-perch, and below are the nets and other sporting apparatus. Under the great bench, three feet wide, is good fresh straw for the dogs to lie on, which makes them better and more apt to hear and smell their masters.” At this time the Calendrier des Berger's is still reprinted at Troyes, but the demand for it diminishes every year, in the inverse proportion of the increase in the number of individuals who learn to read. If the labours of the council of enlistment did not furnish us with more direct evi- dence on this point, we might obtain a sufficiently satisfactory result from the fact, that the Almanach des Anes, of which, even in the time of ng empire, 300,000 copies were printed, has now scarcely 20,000 pur- chasers. ; The Cantiques Spirituels, which long contested the palm of literary popularity with the Almanachs, have lost ground in the large towns, but preserve their footing in most of the provinces. Nota country fair or market is held without its being attended by some itinerant ven- ders, with a sanctified and artful deportment, straight hair, and covered with chaplets, scapularies, and agnuses, proclaiming to his half-penitent audience the healing virtue of certain relics. Each separate locality having thus the means of extolling its own relics, these lyric manifes- tos supply the place of those chevauchées (cavaleades) of the middle ages, when the desire of possessing such objects was (from their value in attracting crowds of worshippers and pilgrims to the temples in which they were enshrined) not unfrequently a sufficient motive for going to war. “Is not the immense number of holy bodies in the abbey of St. Saulve de Montreuil,” says the historian of Abbeville, “a sufficient proof of the cupidity of the Counts of Flanders? Were not all those holy bodies stolen? Did not the nose of St. Wilbrod come from 46 The Popular Literature of France. [Juxy, the priory of Wetz, in Holland? and the navel of St. Adhelme from a Norman monastery ?” These spoliations gave rise, as may be easily supposed, to severe reprisals, so that a particular relic taken, recovered, and retaken by open force, sometimes travelled backwards and forwards for months, before it found a permanent resting-place. St. Hubert and his infallible greyhounds, St. Aignau, St. Clotilda, St. Lucia, St. Vigor, St. Barbe, St. Michael, and St. Marcouf, and numerous other beatified personages, are always the principal heroes of this pathological poetry. Each of them has the cure of a specific disease ; but as it sometimes happens that the patient is ignorant of the precise nature of his malady, he has recourse to a sort of diagnostic, which also may be traced to some ancient tradition of paganism. A certain number of ivy-leaves are placed in the evening on the surface of some water contained in a ves- sel ; care is taken that the upper part of the leaf remains dry. To each of these leaves is given the name of a saint known to cure one of the complaints with which the patient supposed himself to be attacked ; and the leaf which is found the next morning penetrated by the water, indi- cates the saint to whom application is to be made. It is not only on the strands of Bretagne, in the midst of the landes, in the depths of the forests of Morvan, but within thirty leagues of Paris—in the depart- ments of the Eure, Calvados, Seine-Inférieure—that these superstitions still exist ; as is proved every day by the judicial proceedings, in which the correctional police is substituted for the inquisition. We have next the Hisrorre ADMIRABLE pu JuiIF Erranr Jequel depuis 1 An XXXIII. ne fait que marcher ; the tri-logic complaint of the chaste Joseph; the misfortunes of Généviéve of Brabant—the model of innocent, unhappy, and persecuted women ; the Lieutenant- General Holopherne mis a Mort, par Mme. Judith; the biographical legend of St. Onuphre, whose prodigies have been realized by Franklin, in ruling the thunder ; and, lastly, that pathetic canticle, Notre Dame de la garde, in which the poor sailor implores the protection of the immor- tal virgin against the furies of the storm :— “ Claire étoile de la mer Montrez-vous dans le danger Dans la nuit Ja plus obscure Servez de phare et de nord (boussole) A ceux qui sous votre augure Espérent de prendre port.” The Virgin is also la belle lune, and l'ancre maitresse ; then returning to themselves, these tarry penitents add— «¢ Chacun de nous est faché D’avoir si souvent péché O Dame de Bonne Garde ! Faites nous ressouvenir Que partout Dieu nous regarde Pour mieux vivre a l’avenir.” There is generally much less poetry in the favourite works of the popu- lace of cities than in those inspired by the solitary life of the hamlet, or the adventurous career of the mariner. In cities almost all the leisure moments of the lower classes are passed in noisy pleasures. They rarely read any beyond a few couplets from a popular vaudeville, slang dia- logues, witticisms of the barracks, the life of some hero of the gibbet, 1831.] The Popular Literature of France. 47 Cartouche, Mandrin, Desrues—or, lastly, a few romances, imitated from Ann Radcliffe, which form at once the delight and despair of the por- tresses ; interrupted at every paragraph of these fascinating studies, by the fatal “cordon, s’il vous plait” (pull the string to open the gate, if you please). We must also include in this list IT’ Histoire du bonne Homme misére, le Capucin sans barbe, les Cing Maris et la Pucelle, le Testament de Michel Morin; mock sermons, remarkable for their obscenity ; numerous discours, in defence of the god Crepitus, in which the celebrated enigma of the Mercure Galant is commented on without the slightest affectation of reserve in respect to style. We often also find in cities the Catéchisme des Maltotiers (Tax-Gatherer’s Catechism), a pamphlet composed against Bouvalais, the Ouvrard of his day, who, to render the resemblance complete, passed some time in the same prison in which the celebrated contractor just named was lately confined. If the old French reputation for gallantry were not already deeply com- promised by the devotion of the present race of men to politics and écarté, there would be good grounds to tremble for its existence, in look- ing at the manner in which le petit seve is treated in the Miroir des Femmes, la Mechanceté des Demoiselles, le Catéchisme a [Usage des grandes Filles pour étre Mariées, &c. Ancient and modern writers, Grecian philosophers and Persian moralists, Scripture itself, all are brought forward, to prove that woman is “the source of quarrels, the scum of nature, the scourge of wisdom, the firebrand of hell, the touch- word of vice, the devil’s bait, a most greedy animal, the shipwreck of the soul, a forest of pride, the vanity of vanities, a goat in the garden, a magpie at the door, an owl at the window, an angel in the street, and a devil in the house.” Fortunately, every one has it in his power to find out that this is a pure calumny ; nevertheless, from the energy of the preventive and repressive system of the heads of some families among the people, we may see reason to fear that the opinion of the calumniators is sometimes adopted literally. By asingular contrast, we find that, in conjunction with these absur- dities, some of the old chivalric romances, inflated with lofty sentiments and superannuated gallantry, have retained their place in the popular estimation ; marvellous epopées, in which all the world, with the excep- tion of a few licentious giants and perfidious magicians, brought in by way of contrast, pass their time in annihilating crime, or cooing madri- gals. These works, with the Cabinet des Fées, form the staple of the Bibliotheque Bleue, some of the works of which deserve particular men- tion :— “ Conquests of the great Charlemagne, king of France, with the heroic deeds of the twelve peers of France, and of the great Fier-a- Bras, and the battle waged against him by Oliver the Little, who con- quered him ; and of the three brothers who made the nine swords, three of which Fier-a-Bras had to fight against his enemies, as you will see hereafter.” This romance, the title of which is a model of its kind, is the trans- lation of an ancient chronicle in verse, in which the history of France is traced up to the fall of Troy and the adventures of Francus, a com- panion of AEneas. Pyramus is the first King of France, Mercurus the second, Pharomond the third, &c. ; excellent historical lessons, as may be perceived. Charlemagne, in all the works of that period, is a sort of Pill Garlick, whom every one delights in making a dupe of. The con- 48 The Popular Literature of France. (Jury, queror of Abderame is no better treated in the Quatre Fils Aymon. This work, which has been called the Iliad of the middle ages, and which, by the powerful interest of its composition, merits the title, is ‘the best known of the innumerable poems which formed the delight of our ancestors; whilst all the others insensibly fade away and are for- gotten, this alone enjoys undiminished popularity, and every year the magic adventures of Renaud de Montauban and the traitor Maugis re-issue from the press. They have, however, a formidable rival in the history of Valentin Urson, the hero of which, a savage nurtured in the woods by a bear, and suddenly removed to a court, shews himself the worthy nursling of his foster-mother. Always fighting, never con- quered, he carries off wives, beats the husbands, lays waste the larder— playing, in fact, nearly the same part as the clowns and harlequins of modern pantomime. Robert le Diable, so famous in the Norman tra- ditions, is but an heroic variety of this personage. Huon de Bordeaux, the most voluminous of the romances of chivalry which have retained their popularity, contains some curious information on the fairy superstitions of the middle ages. The foundation of the Oberon of Wieland is to be found there. The comic character is a laiton de mer, the prototype of all those goblin servants which still exist in the imagination of the peasantry. We also there observe the strange and constant alliance of the fairies with Christianity. Thus Oberon, a most orthodox fairy-king, never fails to exhort his knights to remain faithful to Jesus Christ, and oppose the followers of Mahomet. Per- haps this romance, and other works of the same kind, have contributed not a little to originate and confirm those numerous superstitions, par- taking equally of paganism and ascetism, which even now are far from being annihilated. In opposition-to these chivalrous paladins who do every thing lance in rest, we have Jean de Calais, a plebeian hero, the son of a merchant, whose destiny, however, is equally brilliant, as he marries the daughter of a king of Portugal. There is some reason to believe that his biography is founded on the exploits of those intrepid navi- gators of Calais and St. Valery, those Angots, who, in the seventeenth century, shewed such fatal hostility to the Lusitanian flag. Jean de Calais has had the honour of being made the subject of scenic repre- sentation, as well as three other heroes of popular literature, Jean de Paris, the Aladdin of la Lampe merveilleuse, and Fortunatus translated originally from the Arabic, and afterwards from the Spanish, and in which La Harpe found the materials of Tanga et Félime. The drama has also borrowed several situations from Tiel Ulespiegle, a personage, the precursor of Guzman d’Alfarache, Lazarillo de Tormes, and the whole tribe of Spanish Picaros. The Bibliotheque Bleue has also its Gargantua, but this is nothing in common with the Gargantua of the curate of Mendon. It is established that the literary existence of this giant was much anterior to the publication of Rabelais’ work, and yet, judging from the following passage in the introduction, his history cannot be of any great antiquity. ‘“ The giants which they shew us every year at the fair of St. Germains, would have been but very little dwarfs,” &c. &c. A volume would not suffice to analyse the whole of these works, more than 1,200 of which are enumerated in the catalogue of a single bookseller at Rouen, who, in common with the members of his fraternity at Troyes, deals specially in works of this description. We may safely 1831.] The Popular Literature of France. 49 affirm, that out of the whole 1,200, there is not a single one containing a rational and pure morality, which would bear a moment’s comparison with “ Poor Richard,” known in France under the title of La Science du bon-homme Richard. We must, however, in justice remark, that, except the Catéchisme Poissard, these works diminish in circulation every year, particularly the obscure compositions, such as the Aventures de Roquelaure. This observation is the summary of all we have said. It is evident that a portion of the common people is beginning insensibly to despise the works which they had so long found sufficient for them ; but there is nothing to supply their place; the public are at once too much and too little advanced in intellect; they no longer relish the doctrines de sapience of the fifteenth century, but they cannot yet under- stand the works which writers, who have either too much or too little genius, are daily bringing out for their especial use. The Cvvilités pueriles et honnétes, in which the faithful are recommended “ not to comb their hair at church,” as if we were still in the reign of Louis XIII., when the fops of the court only shewed themselves in the holy edifice to ogle their mistresses and repair the coquettish edifice of their head-dress, are no longer adapted to the comprehension of the public ; but they would be equally far from understanding the Code de la toiletle and the Manuel de l'homme de bon-ton. In this situation a wise direction to the popular press would assuredly be an immense benefit in its immediate effects, and even in its reaction; and a spark of the genius of Paul Louis Courier would not be superfluous in directing, to the desired end, a reform of which it was his mission to be the Luther ; but the traditions of his method exist, and there is sufficient talent to make the application of them. Ameliorations have already been intro- duced ; may they continue, with the precaution derived from experience not to attack violently the habits, and even the prejudices, which cannot be conquered in a day. Instruction must be gradual and prepared for the multitude (to use the words of the author of Emile), “ as bread is cut up for children by the nurse.” Then if the government interferes at all, let its action be invisible. From time immemorial it has been regarded with adistrust, alas! but too justifiable. But in proportion as official interference is fatal, an indirect and supervising influence will be advantageous; and in order to exercise it, a minister of the interior should, perhaps, revive the mysterious excursions of the Caliph Haroun- al-Rasched, to inquire not what the people say, but what they read. LODGINGS IN THE STRAND. _ Wuar a charming place this London is for high heads and low pockets, for a man whose pride and whose pence preserve an inverse ratio to each other! Talk of the declension of the drama, the degeneracy of acting— it is all “ vow et preterea nihil” —there are more livelihoods gained by histrionic representations at the present day in London than there ever were. It is not necessary for an actor of genius to confine his exertions within the walls, or to the boards of this or that edifice dedicated to scenic illusions ; it may not be politic for many to have their names ex- hibited in relation to their calling in a play-bill, that the world may recognize them as disciples of Thalia or Melpomene ; or never to follow their art, but in the sock or buskin, its types and badges—no! be the M.M. New Series.—Vou. XII. No.67. H 50 Lodgings in the Strand. {Juuy, world the great stage on which their “ exits and their entrances”) are made, and let their “ little hour” be swelled to the duration of a life. There is then no manager, decked with a little brief authority, to come between them and the public—no partial critics to write down their merits—no capricious audience to conciliate ; no one sees the exertions they make, and therefore it is in no one’s power to interfere with them. How many dislike the society of an actor, merely because he is an actor, although probably a very amiable man! “ We wish,” say they, “ for no collision with such characters—they are very well in their way—that is to hear and see; but who would think of admitting, as intimates, professed dissimulators, and therefore dangerous associates? Can we expect that there is one ingenuous sentiment remaining within those whose whole study is imitation, whose highest ambition is to be transformed into fac- similes of others?” Should this poor wight profess a warm. and generous friendship in real life, there are twenty to exclaim, “ How natural—but recollect what an excellent Pierre or Antonio he makes!” Should he come as a sympathizer in misfortune—“ Capital ! Iago to the life!” A lover—Romeo, Icilius, e¢ hoc genus omne ;—in all, he only gains credit for playing a part, and his success is adequate to what it would be “in his proper sphere.’’ How different is his case who preserves all the paraphernalia of stage trickery within himself, who is obliged to no sensible helps, and can, on occasion, alone “ play many parts,” or even press some of his audience into his dramatic corps, without their being privy to the capacity they fill. Such is the actor of real merit, and in London there are many such. I am one of them—start not, reader, I am not going to act upon you, at least not to your disadvantage, I hope. I have an extensive ‘circle of acquaintances ; a large connection being a primary requisite in all. pro- fessions, but an indispensable one in mine. I have my breakfast ac- quaintances, my dinner acquaintances, and my supper acquaintances ; these compose my gallery, box, and pit audience. In the first class are young men in chambers and lodgings, literary persons, whose finances have not reached the matrimonial degree ; and even, in the session, some members of parliament, come to town without their wives. The ladies are. seldom included in my matin speculations ; however, they enter largely into the next class; that is composed of mothers, who love shop- ping and a cicisbeo, misses whose sway at home extends to an invitation for dinner, brothers ditto, bon-vivants who need a boon companion, and authors aspiring only to fame, delighted to secure an after-dinner victim to their lucubrations ; this is by far the most numerous class, and, as ig proper, is my stap!e resource. The third and last is more heterogeneous and undetermined ; being made up, for the most part, of the other two, with a few stragglers, peculiarly its own—such as tavern friends, street- acquaintances accidentally encountered, and three or four old maids, who, by a supper, reward the exertions of a novel-reader, when his throat refuses to squeak forth a line more after five or six hours’ uninter- rupted duty. This tiers état completes the list. . But the reader, if he knows me, will say, “ How did you contrive to get into so much, and such good company ? You have no means of return- ing all those breakfasts, dinners, and suppers ?”—True, but there lies the secret ; I have lodgings in one of the best houses in the Strand—witness my inviting ticket ; and who knows that I may not one day entertain. Look at the mansion I inhabit ; the first floor of it lets for four guineas 1831.) Lodgings in the Strand. 51 a week,-and perhaps I am the occupant. Is not my popularity accounted for? Add to these presumptive attractions, the evident ones of exterior and manners ; my owfside is unobjectionable, thanks also tomy “ credit- able” residence ; and, from my conversation, it is very evident that Iam neighbour to King Charles, who bestrides the “ high horse” at our end of « the Strand,” and this, believe me, goes a great way. In these facts simply, lies the mystery. : But the course of good fortune never did, for a continuance, run smooth. A storm, some time ago, impended over me, that I foresaw not, in proper time to avert ; although appearances, for one entire fortnight, loudly proclaimed it. These were attentions the most marked from all my friends, who seemed simultaneously affected with a violent attachment to my person and society. Among those of the first class, I became, tout-d-coup, a “devilish good-hearted fellow,” “my worthy friend,” and “ the best crea- ture in the world.” Hlalf-a-dozen breakfasts a morning I usually had on my hands, and had eggs been bantlings, Professor Malthus might have “grinned a ghastly smile” of satisfaction, to view the Saturnean feats I was compelled to perform. But it was in the second class that I had the most overpowering tokens of affection to encounter ; nothing could be done without “ dear Mr. ’s” advice and co-operation.—* Mamma was so angry that Mr. did not dine with them yesterday.”’—“ Emily, Fanny, Jane, and Polly were aw désespoir last evening, not to have their favourite Mr. —— among them.” “ Major Bottleblossom vented his spleen upon the claret and madeira, in the absence of his friend Mr.——.” In fact, so warm had the young ladies become in their attentions, and so well-favoured did I appear in the sight of those in authority over them, that I began, for the first time in my life, to entertain serious notions of matrimony. It was evident that I had only to throw the handkerchief to secure my sultana among a hundred eager candidates for the distine- tion; there were the five Misses Bottleblossoms, daughters of the gallant major before mentioned; the three Misses Slashemall, an eminent surgeon’s lovely brood ; the pretty Fanny Syllabub ; the four honourable Misses Rustaway ; the three extraordinary MissesCockletip; my literary friend Mademoiselle Aubifoin, who had about six months previous come “ O’er the deep waters of the dark blue sea,” on a visit to my two singing friends, the clear-throated Misses Huski- son. Shall I forget the beautiful Sally Wimple? when I do, I must forget excellence of all kinds. These do not form a sixth of my list, but they are the most prominent, as being most capable of support- ing the dignity of my “lodgings in the Strand.” And now the diffi- culty was to decide: the last-mentioned was my favourite, but the five first had each some thousands of arguments in her favour more than any of the others; they had obtained “ golden opinions” from many persons, and, asa philosopher, I felt bound to distinguish sterling merit, even though it presented itself under an unfavourable aspect. Three nights, on my return to my lodgings, did I sit for four hours inwardly debating this knotty question. The competition now lay exclusively between Angelica Celestina Bottleblossom, the youngest of the five— for six years aged five-and-twenty—and the fascinating Sally, scarcely seventeen. On the fourth night I had something else to think of. “ Well, girls,” said Major Bottleblossom, entering the breakfast- room, where Mrs. B. and the five buds were assembled, with a news- H 2 52 Lodgings in the Strand. [Juxy, ‘paper in his hand, “ his Majesty has accepted, the invitation to the civic dinner on the 9th.” « Gracious me, has he?” ejaculated Mrs. B., Miss Dorothea Matilda, Miss Susanna Augusta, Miss Julia Honoria, Miss Georgiana Monimia, and Miss Angelica Celestina, in a breath. “ How delightful !” said Mrs. B. “How charming!” followed Dorothea. ‘“ How pleasant !” succeeded Susannah. “ How gratifying!” lisped Julia. “ How agree- able!” sighed Georgiana. ‘ How fortunate we are,” exclaimed An- gelica, “ in being acquainted with Mr. , who has ‘lodgings in the Strand !” How unfortunate was it for poor Mr. , how unlucky for him, that the King had consented to dine in the City! I was now beset on all sides; not only the three classes co-operated in worrying me to death, to obtain accommodation at my “lodgings” for themselves to view the show, but their relations and acquaintances, and their relations’ and acquaintances’ sons and daughters, thrust their recognitions and familiarities upon me by dozens—invariably followed by a request to “let them stand any where, just to have a peep at the procession.” Large as my acquaintance necessarily was, I had no idea that I:pos- sessed such an overwhelming assortment of friends ; they seemed to start up at every corner of the street, and the cards left at my “ lodgings in the Strand,” were incalculable. Of those who considered themselves entitled to precedence on this, to me melancholy, occasion, the number was somewhat above two hundred ; these I could not refuse. To each, individually, I was under obligations, and they all expected a return, now that, as they considered, I had it in my power to make one. But what was the real state of the case? My “ lodgings in the Strand” consisted of one miserable attic, ten feet by seven, illuminated only (when I was not there myself) by a single window, two feet wide ; this latter looked out on the parapet, which indeed commanded a view of the Strand, but my share of which would scarcely accommodate ten persons, with all the ingenuity I could use in their behalf. Add to this, that the favoured ten, when they had succeeded in attaining their dizzy station, would find themselves in very unusual company—the friends of my next-room neighbour, one of Warren’s blacking-stirrers, who pos- sessed similar advantages with me, and consequently was entitled to half the parapet. But, independent of this respectable collision, what was I to do with the remainder of the visitors that I calculated upon— between three and four hundred persons? There were but 146 thrust into the Black Hole at Calcutta, and 123 of them perished in a few hours; how then should I cram more than double that number into the still smaller space of my attic apartment ? Oh! the days and nights I spent revolving my desperate situation !—. no courage had I to explain to a single individual the cause of the utter prostration of mental and bodily energy I exhibited, and which was becoming every day more and more apparent. I still moved among them, but my identity was scarcely discoverable ; my cheeks grew lank and colourless, my eyes sunken and glazy, my figure attenuated, and my dress comparatively neglected—-I strove to laugh, but the attempt was hysterical—I listened to the joyful anticipations of young and old, all directed towards the gratifications I was to afford them—I beheld new dresses, pelisses, shawls, bonnets, caps, &c., arrive to each of my female acquaintances, and I was told they were intended to grace my. 1831.] Lodgings in the Strand. 53 windows. The prudent portion of my intended visitors requested me not to put myself to any extraordinary trouble for their reception; “ a few cold fowls and some wine,” said they, “ laid ina back room, will be quite sufficient.”——“ How delightful a little dance would be after the show !” whispered pretty Fanny Syllabub, “ if it was only to the piano ; I dare say Mr. has got one ?”—*“ Oh !” responded Angelica Celes- tina, “ I know he has, for he told me he sometimes amuses himself, learning to play on it.” Thus, another thorn was added by the thought- less fair ones to those which were already stinging me to death ; they determined on having a dance, and I—cur non omnia ? assented. A mi- racle, thought I, can only save me now ! The first week of the awful month I passed in a sort of desperate resignation to the certain fate I saw gradually approaching. I made no preparations. All the under part of the house, I understood, was to be thronged—no hope, therefore, remained in that quarter; and, although to bribe my next-room neighbour for a loan of his apartment I had every wish, alas! my coffers held my inclination in bondage. Sunday the 7th, dawned. “ Well,” said I to myself, “if I can’t shew ‘ fair play,’ let me exhibit a ‘clear stage,’ at all events ;” saying which I jumped from my sleepless couch, and immediately laid about me with a vigour that astonished myself. “In the twinkling of a bed-post” I knocked four of them from their perpendicular on the floor, and in a few minutes had thrust the ‘whole sleeping paraphernalia from the room ; then I seized hold of two crazy chairs, and excluded them likewise; a table shared the same fate, and, in short, a complete vacuum was in half an hour obtained. The window was now wrenched from its moorings, and a strict survey made of the territory I could command: this, as I before stated, was certainly capable of accommodating about ten persons, and these I determined should be the Bottleblossoms and the Wimples, who would thus complete the number.—Fate might dispose of the rest. All that day I laboured intensely to render this eyrie tenable, and the entrance to it somewhat less hazardous. The apartment itself, too, by wheedling my gruff landlady, I got into some sort of receptionable order, and, by two or three personal sacrifices, I contrived to furnish my table with a pair of tolerable looking decanters of wine, and a cold roast goose. Al- together, towards evening, the thing did not present a very bad appear- ance, and I contemplated it with feelings much relieved. The subsequent day I determined to spend entirely among my friends, that it might not appear that I was obliged to be personally concerned in the arrange- ments for their reception at my “ lodgings in the Strand ;” besides that, I might afterwards throw much of the onus of the disappointment which awaited them, on my landlady and her servants, who, of course, were to take advantage of my absence, &c. &c. That night I spent with the Bottleblossoms, and made desperate advances to Angelica Celestina. I thought her eyes betrayed a particular interest for me, as they rested on my haggard countenance; and as I boldly asserted that love was consuming me, I hesitated not to assign it as the cause of my altered ap- pearance: this made no little impression on her, and as, towards the close of our conference, her voice assumed a tone of tenderness, testi- fying that love’s relative was pleading my suit, I scarcely two or three times restrained myself from making a frank avowal of my real circum- stances, and throwing myself on her compassion and indulgence, I forbore, however, for the present, but resolving to reconsider the step 54 Lodgings in ithe Strand. [Juny, against the morrow, and then act decisively one. way or the other... At parting for the night, the Major made me promise to breakfast, with them in the morning. = Monday the 8th.—“ I will pour my sorrows,” said I, as I strolled, to- wards the Major’s, “ into the gentle bosom of my Angelica; this day is the last of my reign, unless by some bold stroke I secure a retreat from the ills that environ me; with Angelica’s assistance I may brave them all—why should I hesitate ?—nothing else now can save me.” Musing thus, and thus determined to make the awful confession, I entered the Major’s library: “Good morning, Mr. ; sad news for us all,” whispered he, laying down the newspaper he had been reading, ‘‘ the King won't join the procession to-morrow, after all.” I felt my heart li- terally leap within me—lI seized the blessed journal in a transport of delight—(I shall continue to take that paper as long as I live!)—'twas true! Oh! who would not envy me my feelings, if I could describe them !—I was emancipated from a living death. Grumble on, good citi- zens, I join you; but, pleased as your Englishman proverbially is with the privilege and enjoyment of grumbling, few there are, 1 ween, who. feel more. satisfaction in the performance of this national anthem than a certain “jodger in the Strand.” Regardless of the gloom that quickly overspread the sensitive Ange- lica Celestina’s fair visage, reflected from half a dozen others around the breakfast table, I positively smiled—in my sleeve ; while I never, ceased all day, nor indeed have I yet ceased talking loudly of “ provoking dis- appointment,’—“ great. preparations,’’—“ insufferable Sir Claudius,’— and “ unfeeling ministers,” though, as far as these last are concerned, I cannot help thinking them, in this particular instance, the wisest that eyer took office ; and out of pure gratitude, and upon the principle that flowers were strewn by some unknown hand upon the tomb of Nero, J shed several very water-like looking tears when they resigned. By the by, as I understand His Majesty mi/l honour the “ good. citi- zens,” although he has put it off, at least once, since the above occurrence; whenever the happy day is positively ascertained, I shall be delighted to give up the eligible apartment mentioned above, in favour of any lady or gentleman ambitious of obtaining “lodgings in the Strand,” Asinstt GOOD NIGHT TO TAGLIONI! Goop night to Taglioni! The thought comes down like a drop- curtain upon all my scenic remembrances !_ Many a time in the past and present month: has this parting benediction been on our lips. » Prince Leopold has wished good night to Belgium, and Leontine Fay ‘to the Haymarket Theatre. Curious and manifold have been the changes of place: and circumstance. Mr. Ward has vacated the city for Lord’s Cricket Ground, and Horace Twiss the House of St: Stephen for ‘the dwelling of Magog. Praed is out of Parliament, and a tallow-chandler is lighted in his stead. May they all live a thousand years—I shall gain nothing either by their presence or absence. I could say good night to a million of them, without a trembling of an eye-lid. — But Taglioni—I should like to see the man who could say Good Night to Taglioni! A-sack and the Thames, near the Isle of Dogs, would be his: appropriate recompence. a8 ¥ 1831.] Good Night to Taglioni! 55 'Eam poor; yet Ihave been three times to see Taglioni. The first time’ was after Pasta’s sublime impersonation of Medea; I shall never forget it—the contrast was wonderful. It was like one of Anacreon’s songs after the Agamemnon of ‘Aschylus, or one of Moore’s Melodies bound up with Paradise Lost. She came bounding forth from the dimness of' the back scenes like a golden roe out of a rose-brake in Palestine, or'a Hamadryad from some myrtle-nook in the Valley of Tempe, who hath heard the pipe of the shepherd among the sun-lit trees. If the reader has not seen Taglioni, I cannot hope to offer any adequate picture of her countenance. It seemed to me, though not what is generally called handsome, to be perfectly interesting, as she stood—but that is not the word—with arched arms and flushing cheek, before the enthusiastic audience. And then her attitude! Titian might have breathed it into colour, or Canova might have kindled the marble with the life, as the sculptor did aforetime, when he had given the last touch to one of his most beautiful statues, and flinging the chisel from him, exclaimed—“ Dice!” Speak! J will not attempt it—words would be weak and idle. I never heard silence so intense; the motion of a fan in Lady Londonderry’s box fell on the ear with startling distinctness. If Juno had been petitioning Venus for her girdle, or Lady Lyndhurst twining her delicate fingers in Lord Brougham’s hair, the attention could not have been more breathless. Do not suppose for a moment, however, that Taglioni is a posture-maker—Brocard is a figurante, but Taglioni is a lady. I have frequently read of performances far more scientifically wonderful than any of Taglioni. William Methold, an old” traveller, in his Relat. des Royaumes de Golconda, speaks of a girl, not more than eight years of age, who could elevate one leg perpendicularly to her head, supporting herself meanwhile upon the other, so as’ to be parallel with his uplifted arm ; and he has frequently seen the dancing girls place the soles of their feet upon their head. 1g ‘Who ever heard Taglioni’s feet touch the ground? I never did. Sometimes, indeed, I thought I could distinguish a faint melody—a Libupious re wodos—like the tremulous murmurs of the water round the foot of a Naiad, as she stands doubtingly by the fou=tain side, ever and anon shaking the ripples into silver light as she bendeth over her own: shadow. Mercandotti’s step was always audible, Brocard’s shoes had the density of Suffolk hiloes, and Mdlle. Emile alighted with an echo like Kean falling backward in the last scene of Othello. But Taglioni—she seemed to float an Iris in the filmy light—a dove’s- wing might bear her up—the gossamer cloud of summer would not fade beneath her—and when she did touch the stage, it was with an aérial and lingering motion —if I may employ so fanciful an illustration —like a humming bird with its purple wings winnowing the air ‘as it sinketh down into the golden bosom of the flower where it sleepeth. It was observed to me, by a clever artist, that her arms were too: long; for my own part I perceived nothing to detract from her enchanting appearance, as she glided along with her limbs wandering at their “ own sweet will,” and the eye acknowledged with rapture that “her body thought.” ; It can never be said of Taglioni, that she is first in a first class; she is the first and the last—we have had nothing like her before, and we shall see nothing like her in after time—Brocard. by her side is like Mori accompanying Paganini. The dancer and the violin-player are 56 Good Night to Tagligni! {Juty, the only individuals on record to whom history presents no parallel. We look from Turner to Claude, and from Chantrey to Canova, and from Fanny Kemble to Mrs. Siddons. They are only great in relation to a greater. I can pardon Brocard her pretty spitefulness. It hap- pened on the last night of Taglioni’s first engagement (this season), that she was vehemently encored in a dance—she had retreated back, and Brocard was commencing—the audience cheered, and Brocard danced, but it would not do—at length Brocard walked up to the beautiful Italian, and making her a bow, awaited for the conclusion of the encore.—Poor Brocard ! It is certainly a pity that no patriotic individual has made any proposal for the endowment of a College of Dancers, privileged to confer honours and medals like the sister universities. Taglioni might read the first lecture on the Poetry of Motion (and sure I am her voice is lovely), illustrated in her own inimitable manner. In India the dancing girls are peculiarly protected by a provision in the Gentoo law, which permits any punishment to be inflicted by the magistrate, except the confiscation of their jewels, clothes, and dwelling. The dancing girl of Hindostan with the rings round her ankles, and her silver bells, and golden garments, and her tresses glittering along each cheek like the locks of the archer God in the old statues, affords the most pic- turesque resemblance to the figures of the bacchantes sometimes found on the antique bas-reliefs. . But to return to the proposal for a new college: surely it is needed. Have we not already a London University, and a King’s College, and an Academy of Music? What glory will shine upon the Monthly Magazine, as the originator of the scheme! The spirit of prophecy is rushing upon me, and I see already in the leading column of the Morning Herald :—“< We have much pleasure in stating that Mdlle. Taglioni has been appointed professor in the New College. The first meeting of the proprietors will be held on the 26th inst.” Who would not bea pupil! Aspasia taught Socrates to dance. Among alist of names distinguished in literature and science, I have only time to mention the Lord Chancellor and the Bishop of London. The Rev. Edward Irving has solicited the appointment of secretary. May the “ good cause” prosper! I am not surprised that the dance, in the old time, formed part of the religious ceremonial. It is the language of the heart,} in its season of joy and freshness. So Eve danced into the nightingale-thickets of Eden ; and Glycera, in the love-glow of a Grecian evening, when she bound (the first of her country’s daughters) the garland of flowers about her forehead, and went leaping in front of the choir up the radiant steps of the temple of Venus. Jeremy Taylor pronounced an anathema against dancing. Had he ever seen Taglioni, he would have taken a stall. In her his eyes would not have been offended by the “ indecent mixtures of wanton dancing.” Her gestures cannot be called prologues to voluptuousness. They address themselves, of a truth, to the senses; but they also wake up thoughts of beauty which sleep, like odours, within the spirit. The eloquent author of the “ Holy Living” might have applied to Taglioni his own quaint, yet exquisite, image of light dancing in the eyes, like boys at a festival. Good night to Taglioni! Yet she is still dancing before me in the light of imagination. That bound!—if the doctrine of the migration 1831.] Good Night to Taglioni ! 57 of souls be true, Taglioni will be changed into a fair and dark-eyed gazelle, in the gardens of Araby the Blest. How the nightingale will hush the voice of its joy as her feet pass, like a summer wind, over the spice-blossoms. She ought not to die! Good night to Taglioni! I am sick and ill, and a poor student ; and my eyes are dim with thought and study. What have I to do with thee, sweetest of Italy’s daughters? Most likely I shall never see thee any more. Yet sometimes it may be, in my silent and lonely room, my heart will travel back to the days that are gone, and the gentle light of one who walketh in her own brightness, may break upon the gloom ; and I may behold thee, yet once again, springing out, like a phantom of the spirit, from the darkness of memory. Good night to Taglioni ! THE RAVINE OF THE UNBURIED DEAD.* Arter the bloody plain of Cuzco had witnessed the victory obtained by the successful Spanish brothers over their unfortunate compatriot Diego Di Almagro, Ferdinand Pizarro (a noble born brother of the cele- brated adventurer) aware of the policy of employing the active and insubordinate officers by whom he was surrounded in some fresh enter- prize, despatched several powerful bodies to seek new wealth in farther conquests. Oue of these, leaving the plains of Peru, penetrated into the higher districts of that country, where the inhabitants, though not less advanced in civilization than their lowland compatriots, possessed more of the warlike spirit of their Chilese neighbours. Here the Spanish adventurers waged for some time dubious warfare with Alpahula, the chief of a tribe which dwelt on the first region of the Andes, and possessed both the courage and the skill to defend their mountain country against its rapacious invaders. Alpahula, although he had acknow- ledged the Incas of Peru as his sovereigns, and had even done cheerful homage to the wise and celebrated Huana Capac, yet exercised in some degree the dignity of an independent cazique, and when civil war and foreign invasion seemed to have deprived Peru of its native rulers, he determined,—not without a sentiment of contempt for the tame submis- sion of his peaceful countrymen of the plain,—to hold out his mountain district to the last. against these haughty intruders on its — inde- pendence. Private motives were soon'added to the public feelings which animated the patriot cazique. His beautiful young daughter: had, in an early stage of the invasion, been surprised at one of her father’s palaces, and carried off by the foreign conqueror. : Undismayed by the artificial thunder of their eastern enemies; un- daunted by the centaur-like combination of steed and rider, the bold eazique and his followers rushed on the fires of the one, and dismounted the other with a bravery which astonished the Spanish chiefs : nay more, Alpahula and some of his most venturous officers dared even to mount the chargers of their fallen foes, and, in one instance, even turned a few wrested carbines against the invader, who had first made their simple _” The following story is founded on an Indian tradition, though the scene of its a events is somewhat removed from the spot that is said to have witnessed m. M.M. New Series—Vou. XII. No. 67. I 58 The Ravine of the Unburied Dead. [Jury, highland: district roll in dismal echo to the thunders of European warfare. Alpahula was no common cazique of a petty Indian tribe. He wasa man of superior talents, as well as indomitable bravery ; but neither talents nor bravery could long avail a primitive American warrior against the military skill and superior arms of his eastern adversary. Juan Di Alcantara, the Spanish General, received strong reinforcements from his powerful kinsman of the same name, and Alpahula, after many desperate encounters with his foe, was at length totally defeated and made a prisoner. The fallen chief had, during the action, sought for death in vain. It was no part of the policy of his enemies to bestow on him such a boon. A report had reached their ears that treasured hordes, the decoration of many a palace fitted for an Inca’s residence, the orna- ment of many aprofaned temple of the glorious god of day had been concealed by Alpahula in some mountain cave, deep amid the recesses of the Andes. Riches, which might more ‘than satisfy the most rapacious adventurer, were, it was confidently believed, to be found in compen- dious abundance by once discovering the place where the vanquished cazique had hidden his treasures. Neither threats nor persuasions could, however, prevail on him .to reveal this important secret, and he was left on the thirtieth day of his miserable confinement with an assurance that he would be visited by the torture early on the succeeding morning if, ere that period, he failed in divulging the hiding-place of his vast wealth. Cazique Alpahula was confined in one of the meanest apartments of ‘ his own palace. Like most of the public edifices of the less heated regions of his country, it was a heavy, low building, constructed of stones taken just as they fell from the mountains, or were dug from the quarry, and only made to unite with each other by a tedious selection of corres- pondent angles and indentures, projections and hollows. Unacquainted, however, as they were with any cement, the tediousness of this process prevented not the persevering Indian from joining these huge masses with an introgressive nicety of union which might astonish a civilized eye. As windows did not enter into the luxuries of a western palace, and the conquerors of Alpahula had supplied him with no substitute for that blessed light whence they had banished him, the cazique saw not the dismantled state in which lay the residence of his ancestors—its golden vessels and decorations removed, and its plates of precious metal torn from the walls they had so recently encrusted. A soft footstep was heard, and a faint light streamed into his dismal apartment.. The Indian chief deemed that his appointed hour of bodily endurance was arrived. The weight of his chains prevented his rising to an erectness of person which might have fitly corresponded with the determined attitude of his indomitable soul ; but he spoke in a tone of stern composure. “ Morn hath broken,” he said, “and you come to execute your foul purpose. Do your worst pleasure. Here—your pri- soner and your victim—I defy you.’’ The lamp was instantly set down. It shone on a tall and slender form. Alpahula felt his knees clasped with fervent devotion, and beheld his daughter at his feet. Natural affection overcame for a moment every sterner feeling in the bosom of the Indian warrior, and clasping his child in his worn and fettered arms, he shed tears of parental tenderness on her head. For some time they remained in each other’s arms without speaking, and as the lamp with gradual increase of light began to shew objects more distinctly in the 1831.] The Ravine of the Unburied Dead. 59 chamber, the father and daughter seemed, with mutual gaze, to be marking what changes time and affliction had made in their personal appearance. The cazique was the first to break silence. With a re- lapse into his sternness of tone, he demanded, “ And what treatment hast thou received at the hands of yon robber-idolaters 2??? —‘* Gentle, and kind, and honourable treatment,” replied Ualla, meekly. “ Goto, daugh- ter; this is no time to jest. I may hardly believe that the whole land of the Sun hath been pillaged of its treasures, drenched in the gore of its inhabitants, and trodden under foot by its lawless conquerors, while one feeble and defenceless damsel hath found solitary grace in their eyes. Answer me truly then, as in the presence of that orb whose rising I may no more behold, what treatment hast thou met at the hands of your cruel victors ?”,—‘‘ They are not all cruel,” answered Ualla, ti- midly. “The second chief who commands our foe hath a gentler and a kinder nature than his brethren. His protection hath procured Ualla life, fair treatment, and honourable respect. To him our fallen country oweth ‘aught that hath softened the conqueror’s fierceness ; and, oh! my father, but for his guardian hand these loved and honoured limbs would, ere this, have been either stretched to torture on their demon-engine, or whitening in the mountain breeze.”’ “ Star of stars—I praise thee !”’ ejaculated Alpahula—“ What though thou hast suffered the foe and the idolater to triumph in thine own land, —what though thou hast withdrawn thy beams from the hoar head of thy prostrate worshipper—yet hast thou not forsaken his child. En- lightener of darkness, I bless thee.’”-—“ But, oh! my father,”’ said the daughter, sinking from the neck to the knees of her parent, “ will you not avoid the dark hour that now awaits you ?—To what purpose--with what hope can you now conceal your glittering hordes ?—Shall they serve the cause of our country in yon dark caves where the blessed sun never calls to light their dazzling brightness, where the damp veil of night shrouds and tarnishes their lustre? The gentle, the noble Spanish cazique, Fernando Di Valverde, hath sent me here to move your pur- pose. He throws himself at your feet in my person, and beseecheth you to think well on the fate that awaits you. He hath prevailed on his brother chief to delay his cruel fiat until your daughter could be sum- moned from the refuge her brave captor had assigned her, to supplicate you to shew mercy on yourself. The young Fernando hath even delayed my coming, to give you yet time to change your stern decision. Ualla’s voice may be powerless with you, but Fernando’s you cannot resist. The sun, rising in his strength, and looking red and angry through the storm-clouds of heaven, that would hide his shining course, is not mere terrible than the glorious young Spaniard to those who cross his path. The moon, shining softly on a dwelling of woe, is not more gentle than he to the feeble and vanquished ; and the evening breeze of the south, sighing sadly over the flowers that close at sunset, is not softer than his voice to woman in her hour of darkness and extremity. Let the beauti- ful Eastern cazique see you, beloved giver of my days, and your pur- “ shall be changed. I vaunt not idly the power of his words—I ve myself known and felt their wondrous influence. Aye, strange to utter, even your words, my father (the reason I divine not), come not on my ear with such*sweet persuasion.—Shall he be summoned to save you from your own stern purpose ?” The cazique, while his child spoke, eyed her with an inquisitiveness I 2 60 The Ravine of the Unburied Dead. [Jury, of gaze which seemed to have no reference to his own situation, but solely to the state of her feelings. ‘“ Ah! guileless daughter of the mountains,’’ he said to himself, with a mixture of sternness and sadness, ‘thy simple young heart hath, all unguessed by its owner, passed into the hands of another. To thy country’s foe thou hast yielded feelings whose nature stands out in guileless revelation to others, while unsus- pected by thyself.’ Aloud he said, with fierce sarcasm, “ And this friend of miserable Peru—this enemy to blood and rapine—joins the tiger-gang which desolates our valleys, and now springs insatiate on our mountain recesses. So mild, so kind a nature might, perchance, find more genial companions and fitter occupation.””—‘ He had quitted both,” answered Ualla, with the fervour of simplicity, “but that his power, once withdrawn, would have left our tyrants without a check on their lawless violence. For me too, father” (she began to weep) “he prolongs his power, because he would not leave me defenceless in the hands of these invaders, nor yet force me from a country where, while my father lives, his daughter will remain, either to find an asylum or a grave.’ « Alas! poor Ualla,” said Alpahula, “I can recal the days when, ere Spanish treachery had taught me dark suspicion, I would myself have lent, like thee (aye, like the royal, yet fallen children of the sun on yon~ der vanquished plains), an easy ear to the professions of our proud and guileful conquerors; but the treacherous sons of the East now spread their toils for me in vain. If thy Spanish protector were of such gentle mould, as he would make thee credit, how would the haughty and un- pitying chief of our captors brook, amid his band, this marrer of their plunder,—this resistance of their cruelty ?””—“ Fernando is come of a powerfuljrace, his blood ranks among the noblest in the land of our conquerors,’’ replied Ualla patiently, “and his soul is of such unquench- able bravery, that even the soldier he restrains both fears and loves the bold hand that would check his rapacity. The merciless chief himself has no mind to chase from his side the high-born and dauntless Fer- nando. Would that he had earlier consented to yield the task of pro- tecting your child ; would that he had been here to lighten the chain of your captivity !—Say, will you hearken to the voice of your daughter’s preserver ; or, can her tongue alone draw from you, my sire, the useless secret of your treasures, and rescue the venerable remainder of your days from shame and anguish? What answer shall I take to him who sent me to save you?” “Go tell the foul idolators, that when the deathless god I worship stoops from his golden height, and sinks beneath yon western waves to rise no more over the land, where his worshippers await him—tell them thou, then I will yield the treasures which once adorned his sacred fanes, to those who have profanely trampled them under foot: Go--go—I see by the faint light which streams from the outward opening of the palace, and makes its way even to this furthest cell, that the glorious god of my fathers is shedding his first morning smile on our land. I may not, as once, go forth to greet his rising, and rejoice in his presence. Guests will soon be here thou would’st not look on. Work that would make the blood hide itself in thy young cheek, will shortly be done in this chamber. Retire—go prostrate thyself be- fore our god in his crimson glory, and pray that thy father may be con- stant: Embrace me, daughter ! it may be we meet no more, until we tread the beamy palaces of our golden father —Farewell.” - But the daughter clung to his knees:in agony, and refused to leave 1831.] The Ravine of the Unburied Dead. 61 him; and when his mandate was repeated, “ Go, prostrate thyself before our day-god, and pray not that thy father’s pangs may be brief, but that his endurance may be unshaken”—she sprang to her feet, stood for a moment, as if bent on some desperste avowal, yet uncertain how to make it, and then said, “ Father, revered giver of my days, I cannot pros- trate myself before yon bright and beauteous star, because in my cap- tivity I have learned to see in the shining orb you worship, the work of a greater than himself; I have learnt to believe that he shall one day be blotted from the face of the heaven he now gilds, and rise no more o’er the earth he now gladdens, while the Creator who kindles his beams shall remain unchanged in his brightness, and immutable in his glory.” —“ It is done,’”’ said the chief, smking on his pallet, with a violence which made his chains resound, and startled the sentinel without—* It is done —my child forsakes the god of her fathers! O hide thy face in clouds, glorious light of earth and heaven ; shroud thyself for ever, and leave in darkness the land where even the race of its chiefs hath forgotten thee. Fallen daughter of the sun, depart! I have not yet the strength of soul to curse thee, but thou hast not my blessing.”’”—-The daughter, with bended head, and arms crossed on her bosom, moved not, but stood meekly before her grieved and indignant sire, as if prepared to endure whatever his displeasure might inflict ; and, when his feelings had some- what subsided, she began in humble and pensive tones to plead the cause of the creed she had adopted. The cazique heard her for some time with the patience of sheer astonishment, and then burst forth with that fre- quent, and too natural query of his Indian compatriots—-“ And what manner of God can he be, who hath such hell-hounds for his servants and children ?”’—* Alas! father,’ said the daughter patiently, “ I have learned that the possessor and not the professor of a faith, must be looked to for the shining marks of its living power. It is because these Spanish caziques and their followers have forgotten the laws, and cast off the spirit of the God whose name they bear, that they trample on their fellow-men, and worship the golden ore for which they are willing to peril their soul and body.—Oh, father, the God of the children of the East is not the cruel God his false and apostate sons would shew him. In my captivity I have learned the language of our conquerors. I have been taught by my generous captor to trace the strange mysterious characters which convey the message of the true God from generation to generation of his children. Yes, I have read (strange word, how shall I convey its mean- ing to my sire?), I have read his written law. O turn, gracious father,” she exclaimed, warming with her subject, “ turn from the bright vice- gerent, whose golden eye the Creator hath kindled from nothing: look above him, to One who can, even in this dark hour, shine into your soul, with a peace and a joy which shall make you lightly hold, even the loss of a cazique’s power, or the surrender of his glittermg treasures.”— « And shall I,” exclaimed Alpahula, scornfully, “ renounce the radiant lord whom my fathers adored, and who poureth his eternal and unwast- ing beams on our land, to worship the God of the Spaniards, who is subject to death, and who hath not the power to restrain the mad cruelty of his followers? Was it for this that the blessed children of the sun left their beaming chambers on high, and descended to teach and reclaim our sires? Was it for this that the glorious Capac and his heaven-born spouse brought peace and glad plenty and social union amongst us? Go to, daughter—I have seen the miserable record which our christian 62 The Ravine of the ‘Unburied Dead. [ JuLy, tyrants call the book of their God.* It shone not ; it beamed not.” I held it to my ear ; it spoke not. I looked within it. Strange characters which told me nothing were all I beheld. I threw it from me in disdain, and marvelled that they who beheld with open eyes the glorious beams of our god, and partook of the fruits his genial warmth calls forth, and walked and wrought in the light he sends, would prefer a miserable and incomprehensible record, of such petty size it might be hidden in the woollen folds of our priest’s garments; to the felt, the visible, the resplendent cause of allthings. Listen, idolatress; when the God of the eastern lands, to whom you bow, hath power to restrain, or justice to punish his merciless sons; then will your sire fall down before the Deity that can make even Spanish hearts prefer mercy to gold !”’—* Alas!” exclaimed Ualla, clasping her hands, and perceiving the hopelessness of pleading for a religion, the chains of whose false professors galled her captive sire, “you believe that the light set in yon heaven is the glorious governor of earth and sky. With grateful homage you offer him a part of those productions his kindly warmth hath called to existence. To him you present the choicest works which his beams have guided your hand to perform. Even the timid lama hath sometimes bled its sacrificial tribute to the being who supplies its gentle race with food.t Yet, look around, my sire; tell me have all in Peru who bowed before the golden orb, and confessed the sacred obligation of imitating his beneficence, have all shed on the little world around them the same kindly influence? No. Yet my sire saith not that the God of the Western world is a cruel God. Unhappy Ata Hualpa, the usurping Inca, still bowed before that sun whose temples he had robbed, and whose children he had destroyed ; yet will not my father pronounce that the golden light Hualpa worshipped was a false and a merciless lord. O my father, the fallen Inca was not falser to the character of his god, than these unworthy christians to the author of their pure faith.” Ere the unshaken cazique could reply, a sound of feet and voices startled his child, and made her heart throb witha sickening horror. It seemed as if some heavy weight were placed in the adjoining apartment. The father looked haughtily prepared. The daughter turned pale as the snow on her native Andes. ‘“ God of mercy,’’ she ejaculated, “ stay their cruel hands. Spare yet awhile—Look in mercy on the soul for which the sharer of thy throne expired.” The Spaniards entered. The answer of Alpahula was demanded. He sternly folded his arms, and seemed scarce to heed their queries. They approached, and laid their hands on his person. “ I have nothing to say,’’ replied the chief—