ED tan ba hang, SAAT LY Chr fete hone sities teen erat ca \) UN Ace | Ft rw VAS THE AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE Published Quarterly by the American Breeders Association FOR THE USE OF ITS MEMBERS PRICE OF SINGLE COPIES, 35 CENTS Address communications to Ameri ican Breeders Associ: ation, Wa -shington, D. C. Vol. Il. No. ae First Quarter, 1911. | _ Whole No, 5 CONTENTS ‘ PAGE PIB PTO TRG OrUnsaiL ester. 12 cael eset sia. cto oto ivid evsast'ssai ale ste Sloat Rc 2 Miller, Dryden, and Warfield(biographical sketches)...................65 3 Join: iDyssclerty (OCR) bee Gisele DOGO MOBS ack nn GEE eee ee 5 WteermMETEIEIE(DOPLEATO)e. cans. «6 oS a cl sets ck aes baw d Suciseomeesmaes eee Progress in Selection as Shown by Advanced Register Records. M. W. Rene STAD CUI ay Ne oh og ced os Siac is avis a averse Seogarmeale sleet Soe 10 ‘ The Inheritance of Left-Handedness (illustrated). H.E. Jorpan, Univer- BEEN. Wien 26 on Sits Oe Oe a te ER ae Che te tet ole ea aie aan i 19 A System of Numbering Individuals of the Human Family. Mossom M. Emo Eabcay cen, OntariOn Canada. . 0.6 see oldies dese le ats 29 Report of the Committee on Heredity of Epilepsy. Wm. N. Buuuarp, 33 The Karakul Breed of Sheep (illustrated). C. C. Youna, Goodnight, Ee ET ag Tair es ga ities SL phedvelshecsabdl s widlnprae God ae w lah 34 Economic Importance of Live Stock Production (illustrated). H®rrBErRT abeRUIE AEs CATA US ys cat cs clave athsty cies sige Was bale tele Gee OS 46 A New Method of Handling Pollen (illustrated). SrmEPHEN N. GREEN, SO yonse ramets ta, als Wlecos iets, liste mej aenad uatecale «2's, tian e eae erase 52 A Method of Corn Pollination (illustrated). F. B. RoBerrs, Manhat- (heii., TESTS eae bd os Gee BIE eC e SCORE LE ES ENE SCENT RCE Eat 54 resiGcnenics ©Onrerence at, PATIS:.. 0)... cede ees nee dine fe ese eee eee ee CO EDITORIALS: Mire secona Volume of the Magazine....... 2.6... cece eee eee 61 Peehotg anti. 2 -W DeaA Eee aR EI ne RP I ree 62 MN Per ali suns IMO CTACTCS., chy. csis da eovsie Sasi oee sete s ee eraat ee aoe 3 63 INCIMO Wed CINeMGIOL COUNUESIES.... .- 0-0 es casdaue rey encte te eee essen eee 64 ‘Extending the Organization of the American Breeders Association...... 65 Oreanization of CoGperative Breeding... ....-. 2. 0... eee ee eee es 66 Financing the Magazine for Wider Usefulmess.......................4.. 68 opera nionim Animal Dreedimg. oo. 0. ci sane oc ses tee em ee ee ee eee 69 NEWS AND NOTES: Maladjustment in Second-Generation Hybrids.......... Ro ee ee 72 Conventional Symbols for Pedigree Tables.......... AS Dsrae nGes Somer ydological Corrections... ..2 5.0606. eee “i ee, oe WemarsortheGaltom Bequest: .......-. 225-6. .55- a Se 25d EG EMC AGOMSMRECEIVEdia sts once. sere osc ne ete ese s RAT ASSOCIATION MATTER: EM Ol eOrtralese OnE TANNIN Gs cass seksi ee oes eA, Back Numbers of the Annual Reports. A ee ee ci = ee Seter iA Pe AS BRAG Membership: . anes as os os Ses saciaie = ee ie 79 Opimionss..... Boe RT MO Ae Se ar Comveinnt, 1911, ROT eHem erica: Brecderemesbals tic \ ua! a\ i \ \+\ R T. L. Mire THE AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE ‘He was of those whose skill assigns the prize For creatures fed in pens, and stalls and sties; And who in places, where improvers meet To fill the land with fatness, had a seat; Whose plans encourage, and who journals keep, And talk with lords about a breed of sheep.’’—CRABBE. Vol. II First Quarter, 1911 airs No. 1 MILLER, DRYDEN, AND WARFIELD The introduction into America of the various breeds of pedi- greed live stock would make an interesting chapter both of the history and the philosophy relating to breeding. Most of these breeds have come from Great Britain and the Brit- ish Isles, and almost entirely through private imitiative. What public aid was extended consisted in permitting the entry of breed- ing stock freeof duty. In many cases the introduction of a new breed has been made in the face of opposition. The American breeders have rather depended upon the Old World to originate different breeds of live stock, and with a comparatively few exceptions have not originated breeds in either the United States or Canada. Many men have gained prominence through the work of improv- ing pedigreed animals from Europe and in winning for them a place in the live-stock production of this country. Others have gained prominence and wealth through making those slower improvements which come with small gradual changes after a breed has been orig- inated. Not a few of these breeders were gifted and many sided and combined authorship and other public work relating to the im- provement of our live stock with their farming and their breeding of pedigreed live stock. As to why the British Isles should have been so active in develop- ing breeds and the United States and Canada should have so nearly confined their efforts to widely utilizing these breeds is not wholly a puzzle. In England, for example, the live-stock growers of a county, having gotten into the habit of showing the best of their flocks at the county fair, are in reality in a community group almost as if 3 4 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE they were codperating. If any outstanding animal gained a repu- tation for remarkable progeny this fact was clearly brought out at the county fair and all the other breeders would seek some of his get to try out in their own herds. If great excellence in the second generation of this progeny again proved the mutating excellence of a given sire, or dam, the whole countryside would begin to take an interest in that particular strain of blood. In this way, decade by decade, new breeds with high power to project their qualities into purebred or grade progeny were built up. These breeds made the British Isles the most famous live-stock center in the world. They brought fine profits to the farmers and breeders through the sale of purebred animals for export to the United States, Australia, Argentine, and many other countries. These breeds provided even a larger profit through the splendid live stock they furnished for the farmers of the Islands themselves. And the success which came from gaining recognition for the most skillful breeding done in the world, as evidenced by the high prices paid by foreign visitors for British live stock and by the high profits on the live-stock farms of those Islands, gave an inspiration to country life which has done much to build up the rural people. T. L. MILLER 1817-1900 One of the men who have to their credit the chief honor of intro- ducing, against opposition and every conceivable form of difficulty, a valuable breed of live stock was T. L. Miller, of Beecher, Ill. Fol- lowing Mr. Wm. H. Sotham, the pioneer importer and breeder of Hereford cattle, he became a great champion of this rival breed of the theretofore nearly dominant Shorthorn. Those interested in the different families of Shorthorns could see no good in the new breed. In shows, in the sales ring, and in the agricultural and live-stock press there arose a heated contest. During the eighties this contest waged especially strong. In those days these two breeds were striv- ing for the market for purebred males with which to grade up the then rapidly extending ranch cattle of the short-grass country east of the Rocky Mountains. That market placed no premium on dairy products. The dual-purpose tendencies of the Shorthorn placed it rather at a disadvantage as compared with the Hereford, and to the everlasting loss of the Shorthorn breed the contest with the Here- ford for supremacy on the plains caused Shorthorn breeders to i i 2 Joun DryDEN 6 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE give relatively too much prominence to the blood of Cruikshank’s wonderfully mutant sire, Champion of England, until now it is diffi- cult to find in the United States enough Shorthorns with real dairy heredity to serve as a base of a dairy Shorthorn sub-breed. Mr. Miller had no intention of injuring the Shorthorn breed. His purpose was to introduce and improve the Hereford breed, and with an indomitable energy he labored at that task. He wrote much forthe agricultural papers. For a time he published a periodical devoted especially to Herefords. For a number of years he published the American Herd Book of Hereford Cattle, and when this enterprise grew too large to be carried on privately he turned it over to the Hereford Society. He wrote a “History of Hereford Cattle,’ a book of some five hundred pages, finishing that task just before hisdeath. This took was published by Mr. T. F. B. Sotham, son of his old-time coworker, Wm. Sotham. Mr. Miller was born in New England, but not on a farm; he learned the trade of a butcher, engaged in commercial operations, and later was successful in the insurance business in Chicago. He seems to have wearied of city life, and settled on a farm of a thousand acres at Beecher, Ill., some thirty miles from Chicago. He is an instance of those whose business talents assure success in whatever they under- take, farming not excepted. JOHN DRYDEN 1840-1909 One of the men who labored to improve our imported breeds of pedigreed live stock, almost to the point of creating new breeds or sub-breeds, was John Dryden, a native of the Province of Ontario, who became a very successful farmer near Toronto. Of his farm it has been said that it was “the best worked and best operated farm in America.” His farm specialties were the breeding of Shorthorn cattle and Shropshire sheep. His breeding work constantly tended in the direction of a more scientific system of breeding. Through that period of Shorthorn history during which the senti- ment for ‘‘fashion” often overshadowed the more fundamental prin- ciples of sound breeding, his steadying influence made itself greatly felt. Mr. Dryden served as president of the American Shropshire Reg- istry Association, also as president of the Dominion Shorthorn Breeders Association, although his most important public work was WILLIAM WARFIELD 8 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE as Minister of Agriculture for Ontario during the years 1890 to 1906. During that period he was a leader of much of the agricultural devel- opment of the province, and especially along live-stock lines. It was he who, during his administration, encouraged the development of the bacon breeds of hogs in that province, and especially the improved Yorkshires, with the result that methods of breeding and handling to produce bacon of high quality were successfully worked out. Mr. Dryden and his associates, through the Guelph winter live- stock show, where prizes were given not only for live animals but also for carcasses showing high bacon type, remarkably improved these breeds from the standpoint of the breeder who seeks the long, uni- form side of bacon with its alternating layers of lean and fat. This work, done in relation to the Canadian effort to lead in foreign markets for bacon, stands out as one of the remarkable achievements in American live-stock breeding. Mr. Dryden’s many friendships in the States attested his lovable character and formed one of the innumerable ties between the two countries. WILLIAM WARFIELD 1827-1907 One of the characters most prominent during the years in which Kentucky supplied much of the Shorthorn blood to the breeding herds of this famous breed throughout the United States was William Warfield of Lexington, Kentucky. Mr. Warfield came of old Maryland stock, his grandfather, Elisha Warfield, having migrated from Annapolis, Maryland, and settled near Bryant Station, famed from the days of Boone. . There he began the breeding of Shorthorns and fine horses. His son Benjamin, father of William Warfield, though he studied to practice medicine, found the love of the farm and of live stock so strong that he forsook medicine for the breeding of Shorthorns, establishing his herd in 1826. William Warfield’s education was also thorough, including a par- tially completed course in medicine. Again the taste for rural pur- stits and the love of cattle decided the son upon a career upon the land. His farm, ‘‘Grassmere,’’ in the bluegrass region, the farm on which he was born, became the seat of his life activity as a breeder of Shorthorn cattle. His most active period was during the seven- ties and eighties, when the farmers of Kentucky, Ohio, and westward began extensively to improve their stock by the use of purebred cat- tle and many established herds of pedigreed Shorthorns. MiLuER, DRYDEN, AND WARFIELD 9 Mr. Warfield stands out as one of the best informed men on Short- horn history and Shorthorn pedigrees. He contributed much to live stock and especially to Shorthorn literature, and his fund of information was at all times at the command of those who were in need of assistance. His two most notable contributions to live-stock literature were the books “ History of Improved Shorthorn Cattle” and ‘‘The Theory and Practice of Cattle Breeding.” He was a strong believer in the possibility of improving Short- horns and other live stock in our own country. He placed great emphasis upon the possibilities of breeding as compared with contin- uous importation. Among Kentucky’s many leading live-stock farmers, Mr. War- field stands prominently as one of a race of noblemen of strong and lofty character. As his ancestors by the force of their character were leaders in their communities, so he was respected, honored, and loved by that wider circle which knew him through the sales ring, the live- stock show, and the printed page. PROGRESS IN SELECTION AS SHOWN BY ADVANCED REGISTER RECORDS M. W. Harper New York College of Agriculture, Ithaca, New York “Breeding for production in dairy cattle in the light of recent advances in the study of inheritance’’ is the subject of a very inter- esting paper recently from the pen of a well-known biologist.! The paper calls to our attention some very important data for the study of inheritance; data, the economic value of which cannot be easily overestimated, as they affect the production of a useful product. From a biologic point of view they may be of no greater importance than the beard on a head of wheat, the length of a rat’s tail, the color of a guinea pig’s fur, or the steps of a Japanese dancing mouse, but from a productive point of view they are of very great importance to mankind. The data, such as therein presented, when extended and properly interpreted, seem to offer, in part at least, a solution of the best method of breeding for increased dairy production as well as to throw some light upon a much discussed biologic question, at least so far as the breeding of the farm live stock is concerned. In view of this it seems worth while to give the paper more than passing notice. It is not the purpose of this paper to enter into a battle of words, to coin new terms or to define old ones, to propose theories of evolution and the like, but to set forth the facts as they exist at the time the data herein are collected. One thing, kindly remember that this article is prepared by a practical breeder. While in evolution time is of no consequence, with the breeder it must be taken by the fore- lock. The breeder must, therefore, work faster than nature; he eannot make use of the leisurely operating evolutionary methods of nature. The action must be accelerated or its cumulative effect exaggerated. Source of the data, Jersey Club’s Register of Merit—The paper referred to takes the records of production of Jersey cows as recorded in the Register of Merit, the official organ of the American Jersey Cattle Club, as the data for discussion. In 1903 the Jersey Cattle ! Raymond Pearl. “Breeding for Production in Dairy Cattle in the Light of Recent Advances in the Study of Inheritance.” wn 10 HARPER: PROGRESS IN SELECTION 18k Club began making official tests of Jersey cows and admitting such animals to the Register as could meet the requirement. In 1908, or five years after its establishment, the first volume of the Register of Merit appeared containing the records of 361 cows. The cow is eligible to the Register of Merit on her own performance alone, whereas the bulls are required to have a certain number of daughters in the Register before they can be recorded. The reason for this is obvious, as bulls do not themselves produce milk. The paper raised the question, “How have the existing Advanced Registry cows been bred as a matter of actual fact?” The impor- tance of a correct answer to this question is admitted, for if we are in possession of this knowledge we may breed some more like them. In the paper an attempt was made to obtain information on this question by tabulating the last 162 cows (Register of Merit Nos. 200-361 inclusive). For convenience of study these cattle were divided into four classes according to the possible kinds of mating, with the results shown in the following table: TaBLE 1.—Breeding of 162 Jersey cows in Register of Merit. | Number of Register Percentage each form Description of parentage. | of Merit cows resulting of parentage bears to | from stated parentage. total. Sire in Register of Merit; dam in Register of Merit. 11 7 Sire not in Register of Merit; dam notin Register of MIGKH. . 065 cago ced 6000s seo ods poe CHROOO cBOD Se ADASe Oe 68 42 Sire in Register of Merit; dam not in Register of | LGR acosBanh dou dU COR GODT TOS OSS SRS OEI Teron 70 43 Sire not in Register of Merit; dam in Register of | IWIGTa kh, Cen cobadoa OC 000 ORDO RO CS Rete Ear iat aararae 13 8 Oba liee etek tretsiae thiclere eielsis coe edielieaedeeebes 162 100 The following conclusions are drawn from the table: ‘Too much stress should not, of course, be laid on these figures. As they stand they have no great scientific value. They suggest a whole series of questions which need more data for their final solution. But the only point which it is intended to bring out here is that the practical breeder will have a great deal of difficulty in finding anything in these figures to indicate that he will be likely to produce more heifer calves that will qualify for the Register of Merit if he breeds from only Regis- ter-of-Merit stock than he will if he breeds from non-Register-of-Merit stock.” In this connection there are two more statements to which attention is directed: (1) “The cow in Advanced Registry has shown nothing except that she is a good milker. She may be and too often is absolutely worthless as a breeder.” (2) ‘There have 12 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE been many Jersey cows that were greater milk producers than was Figgis or Marina Pogis, but how many of them can produce a son that will get nine or fifteen daughters in the Advanced Registry?” Jersey cow butter tests—Not only are the above data incomplete but they are built upon an entirely erroneous assumption; namely, that all Jersey cows outside the Register are poor producers and not in the Register because they fail to meet the requirements. As a matter of actual fact there are many good Jersey cows not in the Register of Merit simply because they have never been tested. They could make the requirements but are not given the opportunity. In this connection it should be remembered that cows from without are continually being tested and brought into the Register of Merit, which will of necessity mean that there are cattle in the Register that do not have Advanced Registry parentage. The percentage of such animals will simply depend on thenumber admitted from without. The larger the number of cows admitted from without the smaller will be the percentage with both sire and dam in the Register of Merit. When the Register was established in 1903, it must of ne- cessity follow that all the animals admitted the first few years had neither sire nor dam in the Register. As years go by, the offspring of the cows first admitted make records and are themselves admitted, with the result that after the Register has been in existence for a period of years a good percentage of the cows in the Register of Merit will have parents in the Register also. An extension of the data in the above table will show this. While the Register of Merit was established in 1903 and hence of recent origin, butter tests among Jersey cows have been made since the seventies, during which time many Jersey cows have been tested and records preserved. Two volumes of these records have TaBLE 2.—Breeding of 162 Jersey cows in Register of Merit. | Number of | | Including buttertested, Register of | Percentage | in earlier records. | Merit cows re- each form of | | sulting from | parentage bears Description of parentage. | stated parent- to total. Number Per cent age. | of cows. | of cows. Both sire and dam in Register............ 11 7 57 35 Neither sire nor dam in Register.......... 68 42 | 39 24 Sireiin Register; dam NOt .....000..00006 70 43 | 53 | 33 Damn Registers “sire not: 25... . 26.006 13 8 13 8 Ot E Ec chcrs\ slave elovatotaraiotersreyeiere'aye's ee aiavare 162 100 162 100 HARPER: PROGRESS IN SELECTION 13 been published; the first, August 1, 1898, and the second, July 15, 1902. By following back the data for the same 162 cows and taking into account the butter tests, we get Table 2 on opposite page. A study of the table including Jersey cows with butter tests shows that the per cent of cows with Advanced Registry parents has risen from 7 to 35 while the per cent of cows with neither sire nor dam in the Register has fallen from 42 to 24. With these facts before us it would seem that our chances of getting an Advanced Register heifer from an Advanced Register cow have been much improved. At the same time our chances of getting an Advanced Register heifer from cows without records have diminished. Holstein-Friesian cows.—During the year 1894 the Holstein- Friesian Association established the Advanced Register, in which are registered individuals of that breed that meet its requirement. Since the establishment of the Advanced Register seventeen years ago, 11,815 cows and 838 bulls have been admitted. With a view to obtaining more information upon the inheritance of milk-nro- ducing qualities a study has been made of the breeding of all Hol- stein-Friesian cows admitted to the Advanced Register during the year ending May 15, 1910. This study included 3,070 cows, of which 2,233 were first records and 837 re-entries; that is, cows increasing a previous record. Classifying the 3,070 cows as before, we have Table 3. TABLE 3.—Breeding of 3,070 Holstein-Friesian cows in the Advanced Register. | Number of A. R. O. | Percentage each form Description of parentage. | cows resulting from | of parentage bears to stated parentage. total. Bothisire‘and dam in’ Register...........0....0..2 | 1,196 39 Neither sire nor dam in Register................... 710 23 Sire neverister GAM) NOG, 2... ce cie\crelere 2 sec. 0 cele oes | 770 25 Wamminvhecister: Sire NOts..... casas cee ccieheesece sl 394 13 TIGYIET | ne ocetreche y RE niGH GEOG EIGER Ee aes 3,070 100 These results are approximately the same as in the extended table No. 2, 39 per cent having both sire and dam in the Register and 23 per cent with neither sire nor dam in the Advanced Register, 25 per cent with sire only and 13 per cent with dam only in the Register. Holstein cows making 50 per cent above requirements.—As previously stated, there are many cows outside the Advanced Register that if tested would make the requirements, which are very low when com- 14 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE pared with high efficiency. Furthermore, there is much variation among cows in the Advanced Register, some barely making the re- quirements, others attaining much higher efficiency. This suggests the question as to the percentage of high producing cows with Advan- ced Register parents. This is the real test of efficiency, as the mini- mum requirements of the Register are not difficult to make. To obtain information on this point all of the cows registered during the year ending May 15, 1910, making 50 per cent more than the requirement have been selected out and are classified in Table 4 below; that is to say, where the requirement is 12 pounds of fat the table includes those making 18 pounds or more. TaBLE 4.—Breeding of 1,121 Holstein-Friesian cows making 50 per cent above requirements. Number of A. R. O. | Percentage each form Description of parentage. cows resulting from | of parentage bears to stated parentage. total. Both sire and dam in Register............. By tNarete 584 52 Neither sire nor dam in Register.................... 157 15 SireninyRegister; daminot 1. .ccsscc cea ccs cence 235 20 DamintReristers sire mot saa.<. acstonte secre cee oeee 145 13 ETO GA rapa ates athe ctoetoters aortas ce ee oe 1,121 100 Here is evidence that, with the requirement increased by 50 per cent, more than half, or, accurately, 52 per cent, of cows making such requirements have both sire and dam in the Advanced Register while only a little over one in six, or 15 per cent, have neither sire nor dam in the Registry; 20 per cent with sire only, and 13 per cent with dam only. This shows clearly that as we raise the requirements the chances of getting an Advanced Register heifer from the outside are quite small while our chances of getting one from one within, if we get one at all, are about one in two. TaBLE 5.—Breeding of 168 Holstein cows making 100 per cent abov requirements. Number of A. R. O. Percentage each form Description of parentage. cows resulting from of parentage bears to stated parentage. total. Both sire and dam 1n Register.............. 123 73 Neither sire nor dam in Register veh 5 3 mire Int Register idaminotin. a2... 6. -f)- cine eae eee 25 15 Dam in Register; sire not.......... A Sine Rice 15 9 To bale ee eee tee Sh eee 168 100 HARPER: PROGRESS IN SELECTION 15 Holstein cows making 100 per cent above requirements——In order to clear this matter up a little more if at all possible, the cows making 100 per cent above the requirements were classified, with results as shown in Table 5 on opposite page: When the requirements are doubled, 73 per cent of the cows have both sire and dam in the Register while only 3 per cent have neither sire nor dam in the Register. Now, our chances of getting an Advanced Register heifer from the outside are only three in one hun- dred while our chances of getting one from within, if at all, are almost three in four. Thus it would seem that the time-worn expression “blood will tell’ has again proven its right to remain the breeder’s watchword. Holstein-Friesian cows with records as breeders.—Since the assertion was made that the cows in the Advanced Register have shown noth- ing except that they are good milkers and that they may be and too often are absolutely useless as breeders, it seems worth while to look to the records and determine if possible the exact standing of Advanced Register cows as breeders. While data on this are somewhat diffi- cult to obtain, some idea of the Advanced Register cow as a breeder may be obtained from Table 6, which is a classification of cows that have produced two or more and four or more daughters with records. TABLE 6.—Breeding of 1,999 and 172 Holstein-Friesian cows with two or more and four or more A. R. O. daughters respectively. Classification of cows. Number of cows. | Per cent of cows. Cows having records and two or more A. R. O. RIMENSELOLS Ror accent ere ee eecieceeestaaee ce 1,076 54 Cows haying no records and two or more A. R. O. ST RRIELET Meet ccpaeien ete raisainiei oie fels visas 10 08 8o wae, 923 | 46 BICC PU ete esehere ie aicte) ove, form's @ ele eV ones oiisie-vt w.s:s 2i3,0'008 1,999 100 Cows having records and four or more A. R. O. GUHA LECT R Ror arstoteteceic cine eievsischecinaltinees cts sae’ 122 71 Cows having no records and four or more A. R. O. PRPURES ERE ES MEP PREG faye cl cist oo. te) ries owas ayes Sich obesebs 50 29 As shown in Table 6, of the cows with two or more daughters in the Advanced Register, 54 per cent themselves have records, while 46 per cent have no records themselves. If, however, we wish a cow that can produce four or more daughters that can make the Regis- ter, the table shows that the chances are about three to one that we will find her in the Advanced Register. 16 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE Holstein-Friesian bulls.—As before stated, bulls are admitted to the. Advanced Register on the performance of their daughters; that is, when a Holstein bull has four or more daughters in the Register, he is also eligible. During the year ending May 15, 1910, there were 133 bulls admitted to the Register. To aid in the study of transmission of the milk-producing character, these bulls were classified similarly to the cows, resulting in Table 7. TaBLe 7.—Breeding of 133 Holstein-Friesian bulls in the Advanced Register. Number of A. R. O. | Percentage each form Description of parentage. bulls resulting from of parentage bears to stated parentage. total. Both sire and dam in Register.................-..+> 85 64 Neither sire nor dam in Register................... 11 8 SirevinvRerister;dam nots-care see eee eee 25 19 Dam in Register sire note. sacceecee ote cece 12 9 PO bs Seep toe cee ee eet eee: 133 100 It will be seen that 64 per cent of the bulls capable of producing four or more heifers good enough to make the Register have both sire and dam in the Register, while only 8 per cent have neither sire nor dam in the Advanced Register, 19 per cent sire only and 9 per cent dam only in the Advanced Register. This goes to show that if we wish a bull prepotent enough to get four or more heifers in the Register, our chances are much in favor of finding him with both sire and dam in the Register. Holstein-Friesian bulls in advance of requirements—As with cows, the requirements admitting bulls to the Advanced Register are not diffi- cult to make. In all 838 bulls have been admitted. The test of efficiency is shown where we raise the requirement. Since the paper referred to raises the question as to the number of cows that can pro- duce sons that will get nine or fifteen daughters in the Advanced Register, nine is first taken as a requirement; then fifteen, and the breeding tabulated with results as in the table below. Again, since getting fifteen daughters in the Register is not very difficult, the standard has been raised to twenty-five or more, then to fifty or more, and lastly to seventy-five or more daughters in the Advanced Regis- ter. This should show relative efficiency and if there is anything in selection should demonstrate that fact. The results of such classi- fication show results as follows: Harper: PRoGRESS IN SELECTION 17 TaBLeE 8.—Parentage of sires, each with specified numbers of A. R. O. daughters in Advanced Register. Number Per cent of Description of Parentage. Dp s of sires. total sires. 251 sires with nine or Both sire and dam in Repgister.................... 145 58 more A. R. O. daugh- ; Neither sire nor dam in Register................. 31 12 ters each, or 28 per : evtigh all mn: Tenis Siredneter(stere Gam NObe casters tose or 46 18 ior Damyin Register; sire MObs.. cases. cielo io = 29 12 Seyi a Ren AEI ea som Sete ceo S OO ee 251 100 112 sires with fifteen or Both sire and dam in Register a ecsemror ates ach 15 67 more A.R.O. daugh- } Neither sire nor dam in Register................. 6 5 ters each, 13 percent |Sire in Register; dam not....................-.... 19 17 of all in Register Damiin Reristerssiramnot.....0-.sasescreenece ee. - 12 11 MO talep se cacaeie. kasi haisc 5 ois ias ake de sais ors 112 100 43 sires with twenty- Both sire and dam in Register..................-- 31 70 five or more A.R.O. Neither sire nor dam in Register................. Q* 0 daughters each, 5.1 Siren Registers GAM MOG: 222 )csc.cisraisietlclstcle sis ales 2's 7 18 Biepeee ce all, tn Dam in Register; sire not 5 12 Register { ye RSL CP ENO Gert etntesetelatelelotatepel = cNeNarsi-rahal © i: “ s OLE ret sheet eiticis toe Ste eeIN eee cas sysie 6 43 100 {4sires with fifty ormore | Both sire and dam in Register.................... 12 86 A. R.O. daughters ) Neither sire nor dam in Registensenire coe tec con 0 0 each, 1.8 percent of all | Sire in Register; dam not....................-.... 1 if in Register [Dam IMehLecister-sireiNObtts se. waeeieeeeeie si. - 1 7 POCA nrr rte rele chs cistens Se ce eer etl esses 14 100 5 sires with seventy- | Both sire and dam in Register.................... 5 160 five or more A.R.O. } Neither sire nor dam in Register................ 0 0 daughters each, 0.6 |Sire in Register; dam not......................... 0 0 per cent of all in | Dam in Register; sire not........................- 0 0 Register = STOLE Le eet Verne cto ccleic Shot eb Tee) isseitieke ws 5 100 The results shown in Table 8 are significant. In the first place, it will be noted that 28 per cent of all the bulls in the Advanced Register have nine or more daughters also in the Advanced Register, and that 13 per cent have fifteen or more A. R. O. daughters. In the second place, it is interesting to note how the per cent of bulls with both sire and dam in the Register increases as the requirements are raised. With the requirement placed at 9 A. R. O. daughters, 58 per cent have both sire and dam in the Register, while 12 per cent have neither 18 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE sire nor dam, 18 per cent sire only, and 12 per cent dam only in the Register. With the requirement placed at fifteen A. R. O. daugh- ters, the per cent with both sire and dam in the Register has risen to 67, while the per cent with neither sire nor dam has dropped to 5. With the requirement placed at twenty-five A. R. O. daughters, the per cent with both sire and dam in the Register has risen to 70 and there is not a single sire with neither sire nor dam in the Regis- ter. In the third place, we note that when the requirement is raised to the maximum, we have all the animals making the requirement with both sire and dam in the Advanced Register. The number of cattle tested for admission to the Advanced Regis- ter is not large. For the past few years only 13 per cent of the Holstein cows and 1.3 per cent of the bulls have been admitted to the Register. This is significant in a study of the data above. When the small number of cows tested and in the Register are taken into account, and the large percentage of high producing animals coming from the Register are considered, the chance of finding a maximum producer from without the Register are not very encouraging. The breeder attempting to produce a Holstein cow with a weekly record of 29 pounds of butter fat, or a bull that can sire 100 A. R. O. daugh- ters, is likely to encounter much difficulty unless he selects parents from the Advanced Register. In this connection, it may be stated that the Advanced Register plays no part in increasing the production of dairy cows, it neither adds to nor detracts from the production, but is simply an instrument in which records of performance are kept, and from which records of transmitted efficiency can be obtained, nothing more. It is easily possible to build up a strain of high-producing cows without the Reg- ister, but practically the same methods that the Register encourages must be employed. The entire matter may be summarized thus: The Advanced Register contains a record of performance which enables us to know the high-producing from the low-producing cows as well as the cows and bulls likely to get high producers. The low producers are discarded and the high producers are propagated, which procedure, in connection with better care and management, enables us to get still higher producers. Again the low producers are dis- carded and the high producers propagated, with the result that the average production and the previous maximum production of the race are raised. Now we are told that this increased production must of course cease when the limit of the physiological activities of the cells is JORDAN: INHERITANCE OF LErr-HANDEDNESS 19 reached. But who wants to go on record in any hard and fast set- ting of the metes and bounds that may or may not limit the working of evolution? Believe me, creation is not yet finished. With proper eare and under favorable conditions, the cow is likely to adjust her- self to the increased demands made upon her system. There are many ways in which this can be done; not least of all is that of increas- ing the number of producing cells, which is what she actually has done and is doing under domestication. THE INHERITANCE OF LEFT-HANDEDNESS H. E. Jorpan i ——_—- University of Virginia, University, Virginia There is a widespread popular belief that left-handedness is here - itary. When left-handedness appears among a childship,’ the par- ents concerned at once trace it to some direct or collateral ancestor. If the known ancestry contains no individual to whom influence may be ascribed, there is occasioned the greatest wonderment. On the other hand, biologists do not seem to believe in a hereditary bias to left-handedness. Otherwise, it would seem, some attempt had long been made to state its principle of “transmission.” Gould (1908), who has given much study to the clinical aspects of left-handedness as supposedly connected with unilateral eye-defect, states very em- phatically that left-handedness is not hereditary, and takes gratui- tous occasion to speak slightingly of “Mendelism.” To the writerthere remains no doubt that left-handedness is hered- itary (in the sense that offspring resemble ancestors in this charac- teristic), and that the condition reappears in successive generations. Leading to this opinion is the fact that in his own ancestry, both direct and collateral, as far as he can determine, there is nowhere left-handedness. Moreover, he has the assurance of a number of friends, taking an intelligent interest in the matter, that the same is true of themselves and their ascendants. Furthermore, ina number of cases known to the writer, the condition of Jeft-handedness has reap- peared three or even four times (one case) in as many successive gen- erations. The fact of its reappearance in certain stocks seems well established. What is obscure, and bids fair to so remain for some time to come, due 1The word “childship” is used in the sense defined by E. Stainer (‘The Hereditary Trans- mission of Defects in Man.” Disscitation. Oxford University Press, 1910) to designate ‘‘the family of children resulting from a marriace,’’ p. 5. 20 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE mainly, I believe, to the small number of individuals in any one affec- ted family, is the rule or principle governing the reappearance. Nevertheless, the following facts drawn from a study of 78 lineages in which left-handedness is noted, representing the result of a can- vas of nearly 3,000 individuals, may suggest a probable state of affairs and perhaps serve as a beginning to an investigation that further study and more data may very appreciably extend and enhance. CAUSE OF LEFT-HANDEDNESS This study is only incidentally concerned with the etiology of left-handedness. ‘The purpose of this research is primarily to note the occurrence of this particular variation among the members of certain families and to formulate, if possible, some principle or prin- ciples apparently governing its reappearance and distribution im certain lineages. The work aims, moreover, to make a contribution to the general subject of heredity. The characteristic of left-handed- ness must have a cause, but whatever this may be in terms of struc- ture is of only secondary interest in this connection. However, it may serve to set the problem a little more clearly, to record that inveterate left-handedness is invariably associated with general left-sidedness, 2.e., left-leggedness, left-eyedness, etc. (see Sibley to the contrary); and that the cerebral localization of this function (7.e., movement of left hand) in the sinistro-manual is in the right cerebral hemisphere (next Broca’s center in the third fron- tal convolution), the reverse condition obtaining in the dextro- manual. The proof of these facts was from the field of pathology and was summarized, and confirmed by personal experience, by Wilson in his valuable and interesting pioneer work in 1891. In this same book are discussed, in a most scholarly way, many theories, mostly mechanical, e.g., transposition of viscera, center of gravity theory, ete., formerly held, all of which are satisfactorily disposed of as very manifestly erroneous or only partially explanatory. Wilson attributes left-handedness proximately to a greater development (preponderant size and weight) of the right cerebral hemisphere and cites authorities (both pro and con) and gives his own evidence from a peculiarly favorable case. The more recent theory of Gould (1908) to the effect sha right- handedness follows the generally more perfect development of the right eye, advanced to supplant all former theories, has been shown by Stevens (1908) to be of doubtful verity. It seems more nearly correct to think of right-eyedness as a condition concomitant with JORDAN: INHERITANCE OF LEFT-HANDEDNESS Zi right-handedness and both dependent upon the same or related cause. At any rate the offered proof is not compelling that they are related as cause and effect. And until Gould shall have frankly reckoned with, and satisfactorily met, Stevens’s criticism his “‘theory’’ remains largely a speculation. A careful weighing of available evidence regarding the cause of left-handedness (as furnished more particularly by Hyrtl, Wilson, Gould, and Lombroso) indicates a better developed right cerebral hemisphere. This would seem to depend upon a better nutrition and ultimately upon a better blood supply. The final cause—the factor determining the anatomical variation in the condition of the foetal blood supply—remains an outstanding riddle. The matter which chiefly concerns us here is to determine in what way or ways this factor (or factors) expresses itself. The fact of the existence of a large class of so-called ambidexters of various degrees, as also of degrees of right-handedness and left-handedness, renders more plaus- ible the assumption that these conditions ultimately depend upon various degrees of variations in the more usual vascular arrangement in the cerebral hemispheres. HISTORICAL Probably the earliest data regarding left-handedness are those recorded in Judges 20:16 respecting the tribe of Benjamin. Here there were 700 left-handed slingers in a military population of 26,700. This proportion accords very well with the recent statement of Hyrtl to the effect that among the civilized races of Europe left-handedness prevails in the ratio of 2 per cent (Gould puts it at 6 per cent for the United States). Regarding the Benjamites, however, one must remember that the Bible narrative gives no clue as to whether the left-handed slingers were by nature or by training (as a strategic mea- sure) sinistro-manual in war. In volume 1, book 4, chapter 5 of Sir Thomas Browne’s “ Vulgar Errors” (H. G. Bohn, Covent Garden, 1836) is given an interesting, more or less absurd, discussion ‘Of the Right and Left Hand’’ with a consideration of earlier theories to account for right-handedness, more particularly those of Aristotle (use), Scaliger (‘‘crassitude, and plenitude of blood’’) and Caelius Rhodiginus (sinistral loca- tion of liver). In a footnote is given Signor Zecchinelli’s very plausi- ble explanation for the general preference of the right hand, quoted from ‘‘Brande’s Journal,” viz: ‘For it must have been observed, that when the left arm is long used, or violently exercised, the left 22 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE side also of the chest is put more or less in motion, and a consequent and corresponding obstacle produced not only to the free emission of blood from the breast, but also to its progress through the aorta and its ramifications.’ (I am indebted to Dr. Bennett Wood Green for this early reference.) Prof. Hyrtl of Vienna has noted a correspondence between the ratio of left-handed persons and the occurrence of certain deviations from the normal arrangement of the blood vessels. “It happens,” he says, ‘“‘in the proportion of about two in a hundred cases, that the left subclavian artery has its origin before the right and in these cases left-handedness exists as it also often actually does in the case of complete transposition of the internal organs; and it is found that the proportion of left-handed and right-handed persons is also about 2 to 100’ (quoted from Wilson). Wilson points out, however, that the evidence that in other cases an anomalous blood supply (trans- position) has been unaccompanied by left-handedness shows that “Gt is no necessary source of deviation from normal action.’ Wil- son calls attention to four cases referred to by Dr. Pye-Smith (Guy’s Hospital, London) where the subject of abnormal disposition of » the viscera had been right-handed. Four additional non-conform- ing cases are cited by Wilson. Dr. Pye-Smith says: ‘The opinion that some difference between the two sides of the brain has to do with our preference for the right hand over the left may, perhaps, be supported by two very interesting cases of aphasia occurring in left-handed persons, recorded by Dr. Hugh- lings Jackson and Dr. John Ogle. In both these patients there was paralysis of the left side; so that it seems likely that in these two left- handed people the right half of the brain had the function if not the structure which ordinarily belongs to the left.’ A third case checked at autopsy is reported by Wilson. Case No. 17 of my own material has a similar history, as will be described below. Wilson believes that left-handedness is due to an exceptional devel- opment of the right hemisphere of the brain; ‘‘that advantage accrues to all from cultivation of dexterity in both hands; that the right hand is given preference naturally or instinctively by some. . . Mma smaller number left-handedness is formed by an equally strong im- pulse . . . but in the great majority right-handedness is largely the result of education.”’ Garman, in reviewing this book in “The Nation,” suggests that the greater development of the left hemisphere may be due to the greater use of the right arm, i. e., cause and consequence are thought of in the reverse order by Wilson. JORDAN: INHERITANCE OF LErr-HANDEDNESS 23 Furthermore, Garman insists that “it is still an open question whether an organ less developed is more liable to disease,”’ as Wilson urges in support of his idea of the value of the traiming for ambidexterity. The final settlement of the question regarding the greater develop- ment of the right and left cerebral hemispheres in left- and right- handed individuals respectively awaits careful study and measure- : ment of a large series of infants’ brains. Gould, with much reason it would seem, ridicules the ‘‘ambidex- terity sillmess” as provocative of much misery. Common sense alone dictates that where one hemisphere is apparently well capable of controlling a certain range of physical and mental activities, it were a waste of time to cultivate a bilateral control (a possibility often realized when a member of one side of the body is incapacitated). Moreover, when a child at school gives evidence of stronger prefer- ment for using the left hand, it were criminal to handicap and abuse that child by forcing it to use the right hand. His theory, however, that right-handedness is due to a more efficient right eye disregards contradictory neurological facts as pointed out by Stevens. Lombroso (1903) studied left-handedness from the viewpoint of mental pathology and psychiatry. He calls attention to a widespread belief in the mental and moral crookedness of a left-handed man. His studies led him to the opinion that the left-handed are more agile, and “ordinarily found among women, children, and savages and they were more numerous in past ages than they are now.’ Among 1,029 operatives and soldiers 4 per cent were left-handed. The ratio among women operatives ranges from 5 per cent to 8 per cent. “Among lunatics the proportion is not much different.’”? Among male criminals 13 per cent are left-handed; and among female crimi- nals 22 per cent. 33 per cent of swindlers are said to be left-handed. The ratio of left-handedness among murderers and ravishers is given as 9 to 10 per cent. Lombroso studied 44 heads of criminals in the museum at Turm and found the right lobe better developed in 41 per cent; the ieft lobe in 20 per cent. Ordinarily, Lombroso states, the left lobe takes precedence. ‘‘Receiving the blood from the heart more directly and in greater quantities than the right, it is the first to develop from the embryo, works more, and is the more voluminous of the two, the right only serving, one may say, as a help or reinforcement to the other’’ (p. 442). Audenino (1907) expresses his opinion that recent researches have shown that left-handedness is more frequent among criminals, 24. AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE immoral individuals, prostitutes and epileptics, and that children during the first month (Baldwin) are for the most part ambidexterous. Further, that left-handedness is a degenerate characteristic, an atavistic phenomenon (Lombroso; Louis Agassiz also held this opin- ion). Lombroso says: “But then, what significance has ambidex- terity? According to Brinton, the anthropoids are ambidextrous; according to Le Bon ambidexterity is frequent among savages, idiots, and infants. Ambidexterity is likewise frequent among criminals and epileptics; also, it seems to me that many of those which appear left-handed (and left-handed on the dynamometer also) are really ambidextrous; and that ambidexterity, more than left-handedness, represents an afavistic character” (p. 26). He admits that it is not easy to tell in many cases whether one is dealing with a left-handed or a right-handed person. Tested with the dynamometer on suc- cessive days subjects (i. e., students, etc.) gave results indicating ambidexterity, right-handedness or left-handedness. This was equally true of individuals who said they were left-handed. Lattes (1907) notes that cerebral asymmetry is greater in delin- quents, children, idiots, and negroes than in normals. He draws the following conclusions from his investigations: 1. Right-handedness is connected with morphological and func- tional asymmetry of the brain. 2. There are two kinds of left-handedness: (a) Atavistic (constitutional), due to an inversion of normal cerebral asymmetry. (b) Pathologie left-handedness (manifested after a left cerebral lesion), which left-handedness is what pre- dominates in epileptics and delinquents. Touching the matter of hereditary left-handedness the literature is very meager. Wilson states that M. Ribot in his “Heredity” wrote: ‘There are families in which the special use of the left hand is hereditary. Girou mentions a family in which the father, the chil- dren and most of the grandchildren were left-handed. In an in- stance communicated to Wilson both parents of a gentleman in Shrop- shire were left-handed. His mother accordingly watched his early manifestations of the same tendency, and employed every available means to counteract it. The left hand was bound up and tied behind him. But all efforts to suppress the impulse were in vain.” Weber (1904) argues that the anthropoids, primitive man and the young child (before eight months) are ambidextrous. He suggests that the almost universal choice of the right hand by the growing JORDAN: INHERITANCE OF LEFT-HANDEDNESS 25 child is the expression of a hereditary bias acquired by man during racial development. Merkel (1904) comes to the conclusion that right-handedness and left-handedness rest upon an heritable originally better organi- zation of the left and right cerebral hemispheres respectively. On the other hand, Kellogg (1898) claims that right-handedness is due to training and habit. He thinks, moreover, that great benefit accrues to the ambidextrous individual, and urges that training be directed to this end. He cites Brown-Sequard as an eminent scien- tific advocate of this view. He notes also, in support of his conten- tion, that Leonardo da Vinci and Michael Angelo were ambidextrous. Galippe (1887) and Broca (1888)—cited by Bardeleben—still earlier expressed belief in the educational origin of right-handedness. As a result of a large series of experiments on his own child from the sixth to her tenth month, Prof. Baldwin (1905) concludes “that dextrality is due to a difference in development in the two hemispheres of the brain, that these differences are hereditary italics my own] and that they show themselves toward the end of the first year” (p. 75). Continuing he says: “It is a singular circumstance that right hand and speech are controlled by the same hemisphere of the brain from contiguous areas. It would explain this—and at the same time it seems probable from other considerations—if we found that the right hand was first used for expression before speech; and that speech has arisen from the setting aside for further development, of the area in the brain first used for the right hand” (p. 76). In an extensive article of 72 pages, Prof. Karl von Bardeleben (1909) reviews the whole subject of bilateral asymmetry in man and higher animals. More than half of the paper is devoted to a critical comparison and evaluation of various theories advanced to explain unilateral dextrality. The appended bibliography of 186 works is possibly the most complete on the general subject. Bardeleben expresses belief in the hereditary nature of left-handedness (likewise right-handedness), but whether this inborn tendency be localized in skeleton or muscles of arm or in the brain he leaves undecided. Nor does he find any clue as to its phylogenetic origin. He concludes that there is as yet no solution of the phenomenon of right-handed- ness, adding that ‘‘no solution is better than one or several that are erroneous” (p. 56). He also thinks that ‘‘man could only gain if, instead of having only one well-developed hemisphere, he had two, which could be employed not only in case of need, but in the varied employments of daily life” 26 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE (p. 43). He opposes the position that right-handedness is due to a better developed left cerebral hemisphere, as supported more especi- ally by Merkel, on the ground that “neurological evidence forces the conclusion that right-handedness is and was the primary condition, the higher organization of the left hemisphere was and is the conse- quence” (p. 48). bs cc . . It must be pointed out, however, that the “neurological evidence” here referred to (7. é., use of end-organ reacts developmentally on its brain center) has meaning in this connection only in the event that it can be proved that a primary better blood supply to one or the other hemisphere does not produce a correspondingly greater development. In opposition to the theory as developed by Lueddeckens (1887), that dextrality is due to asymmetry of the large arteries, he argues that also the better blood supply of the left hemisphere is consequence (not cause) of right-handedness (p. 28). The main support for this opposition seems to be derived from the fact that cases of situs inversus have been recorded coincident with a condition of right-handedness. It must be emphasized, however, that the theory does aot necessarily imply complete situs inversus. The blood vascular system is subject to a wide range of variations. A very slight alteration in the more normal arrangement in early embryonic or foetal life may be sufficient to supply the better nutri- tion from which a better developed right hemisphere may originate, determining a future left-handed individual.? Bardeleben also introduces an element of confusion in the whole discussion when he speaks of anthropoids as preponderatingly right- ’ This idea is based upon the anatomical relations of the arteries (internal carotids) carrying the blood to the developing brain. The arrangement, as concerns the arteries involved (internal and external carotids and subclavian), is relatively permanent after the eailiest embryonic stages (ca. 5 weeks). Examination of the arrangement of the aortic branches of a 10 mm. human em- bryo reveals the fact that the most direct course of the blood passing trom the left ventricle is up the innominate artery. However, before reaching the internal carotid, {he main stream is shunted off into the right subelavian artery. Moreover, the most direct course for the remainder of a particular stream is up the exsernal carotid. It follows, then, that the internal carotid receives a relatively small portion of the blood directed towards the right side. On the contrary, the most direct course for the blood passing to the left side is up the left common catotid, and into the left internal carotid, which thus receives the main stream. As compared, then, with the right, the left internal carotid receives during embryonic and fcetal life a larger amount of blood. Moreover, as compared with the right, the left subclavian artery receives a considerably smaller amount of blood. Thus the combination of vascular conditions favoring the better development of right arm and left cerebre] hemisphere may conspire together to produce right-handedness; a reversal.or distu. bance of such conditions, left-handedness—or the various derrees of ambidex- terity. St:onger right arm and better developed left cerebial hemisphere may possibly not be in the relationship to cach other of cause and effeet (Bardeleben) or the reverse (Wilson), but may both be due to the normal anatomical arrangement of the main branches of the arch of the aorta, determining that these two structures on opposite sides of the body, as compared with their respective comites, shall be better nourished; hence both may really be the combined prox- imate cause of richt-handedness, / JoRDAN: INHERITANCE OF LEeFr-HANDEDNESS at handed on the basis of greater development (size and weight) of the right fore-imb. Right-handedness (in the restricted sense in which the term is ordinarily employed) signifies essentially greater dexterity with that hand, or a predominating tendency to use the right hand in executions requiring skill and in delicate manipulations. It seems necessary to make a distinction between functional (deftmess) and structural (size and weight) bilateral asymmetry (cf. Weber). Bardeleben thinks finally that there is no satisfactory anatomical explanation of right-handedness yet forthcoming. ‘‘We know as little why we are right-handed, and why a certain proportion of man- kind are left-handed, as we are able to state what ‘right’ and ‘left’ are, or why there are dextro-rotary and levo-rotary solutions of sugar and other substances, or why some of the planets revolve around the sun and on their own axes from right to left and others in the oppo- site direction” (p. 36). The report that certain animals (e. g., lion, camel, parrot, monkey, etc.) are predominantly right or left-handed is probably without - foundation in fact. The apparent left-handedness (left-footedness) of parrots, so frequently cited, is a simple matter of imitation and convenience as demonstrated by Dr. David Starr Jordan. Ordi- narily parrots are approached in feeding, etc., with the right hand. They most conveniently receive with the left foot. When the left hand is employed in the test, the parrot invariably responds with the right foot. The several points appearing in this brief survey of the literature upon which my own results may be presumed to bear are (a) left- handedness is localized in the right cerebral hemisphere (Hyrtl, Wilson, Cunningham, Merkel, Baldwin); (b) left-handedness is hereditary (Wilson, Merkel, Weber, Bardeleben; Gould expresses an unqualified denial; also Kellogg); (c) left-handedness occurs more frequently in females than in males (Weber); (d) left-handed- ness is more frequent among delinquents (Lombroso, Audenino, Lattes) ; (e) left-handedness is more frequent among negroes (Lattes). The heredity character of left-handedness is the point especially sought to establish in the material and arguments presented below. GUIDING HYPOTHESES As my study of left-handed families progressed, the following hy- potheses, conforming in general to a Mendelian interpretation, suggested themselves: 28 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE (a) Left-handedness (L) and right-handedness (R) are depend- ent upon a varying anatomical condition; secondarily on the condition of the blood supply (on evidence of the above-named investigators). (b) AR=usual condition, therefore tends to be dominant. (c) L=variant condition, therefore tends to be recessive. (d) Ambidexterity (A) = condition of imperfect dominant or “blend.” (e) RXL=RL=right-handedness or ambidexterity. (f) RLUXRL=RR+2RL+LL=3R+1L. (g) 2RLXLL=2RL+4+2LL. (bh) RLXRR=2RL+2RR. The final effort was to attempt an interpretation of the 22 family histories respecting which the data were more complete and reliable, in terms of the Mendelian formule d to g. It must be admitted at once that the formule fit only selected cases, and in all cases, of course, the character of the parental germ cells can only beinferred. Non- conformity may very likely be due to comparative scarcity of data. There is significance in the fact, I believe, that none of the collected data directly contradict these formule. MATERIAL The material for this study represents the results of a canvass of the university students (700) and the pupils of the public school (white 1,394, colored 668). The following 24 schemes give the facts regarding the most interesting families. These pedigrees are of university students, of pupils of the white public school, and of the pupils of the colored public school.* DESCRIPTION OF SOME OF THE FAMILIES Fig. 1. This pedigree shows transmission by a carrier male, and gives a four-generation history of left-handedness. 3The following symbels are used in the heredity charts: CT male, right-handed; O remate, right-handed; Bo male, left-handed; @ female, left-handed; Gal male, ambidextrous; @ female, ambidextrous; —= sex unknown, right handed; CG — sex unknown, left-handed. Boyp: A System oF NUMBERING INDIVIDUALS 29 Fig. 2. This childship is interesting mainly for the reason that it shows direct transmission to half the individuals and both the affected and unaffected are equally divided as to sex. Continuation in next number. A SYSTEM OF NUMBERING INDIVIDUALS OF THE HUMAN FAMILY Mossom M. Boyp Bobcaygeon, Ontario, Canada. To one who has had to do with pedigreed live stock where each animal is given in addition to its name a distinctive number for the purpose of exact identification and ready reference, the question naturally occurs whether the same idea of adding a number to the name could not with great advantage be followed in the registering of human births; and for the purpose of exciting a discussion on the sub- ject the following crude scheme is outlined and some of its points considered. If numbers were added to the name of the individual and the pres- ent system of state registers made to center in a national register we would have for the human family of the nation the same accurate and ready genealogical information as is now provided in the case of the better classes of our domestic animals. The present system of registering by names which are common to numbers of different persons furnishes so little identification as to be almost useless, whilst the amount of work involved is nearly or perhaps quite as great as would be required for the immeasurably more exact and useful system proposed. At present the registration of births, deaths, and marriages is, in Canada, a provincial institution, under which the local registrar sends in his registrations periodically to the capital of his province. In the United States I presume registration is at present a state insti- tution. 30 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE According to the scheme we are proposing it would be a national institution and the local registrars would send in their registrations periodically (say monthly) to the national capital, where numbers would be assigned, the registrations compiled, and copies returned to the local registrars; there would then be two sources of information, namely, the office of the local registrar in each municipality and the office at the national capital. The numbers thus assigned monthly would in a general way be chronologically consecutive with respect to the dates of the births; and this would be convenient but not at all essential. Assigning numbers to all future births would immediately bring all the coming generation under the system, and all the important part of the present generation would be brought in also, by assigning numbers to the parents at the same time as assigning numbers to the births. Immigrants could be assigned numbers in the same way as births, so soon as they become settled in their new homes; or they could be permitted to remain until they presented births for registration. A number is itself an index to its own location in every consecutive list; and the system of numbering once established, it is probable that statistical lists mtended for reference would then usually or always be made in the order of consecutive numbers, with or without the addition of the names, as the case might call for. Given any individual’s number, the father and mother could be immediately ascertained by reference to the national records, and the exact pedigree established as far back as the records extended. The numbers which go to this pedigree, having been written down consecutively, could be readily detected in any consecutive list it was desired to search: for instance in the army list, navy list, list of legislators, Judges, professional and business men in the various professions and lines of business which keep registers of their members; in the registers of asylums, prisons, tuberculosis and cancer hospitals, etc. Such lists are kept at present but are compiled with names alone, which, as said before, furnish so little identification that one has to have outside information in order to know whether the name when it occurs refers to the individual in question or not. When compiled according to consecutive numbers, these lists could be readily searched, and would furnish exact infor- mation. It is needless to point out the great advantage to the study of eugenics. The way would be opened to the compilation of a great Boyp: A System or NUMBERING INDIVIDUALS a1 variety of useful statistics helpful both to those studying eugenics and to those desirous of putting into practice the precepts it teaches. By his identification number the individual’s history could be read- ily and accurately traced through his school, college, university, military, naval, professional, or business career; assuming that all institutions were then to maintain numerical lists as most of them do now alphabetical lists. One indirect advantage would perhaps be the stimulus to the individual, seeing that his identity was so tho- roughly established for all time to come, to make as good a record for himself and his family as he could accomplish; and to have his number appear in as many honorable lists and in as few discreditable lists as possible, knowing that his number wherever it might appear would definitely point to him. He would probably display more care on account of the number which was his exclusive property than on account of the name which he shared in common not only with relatives but probably with many others in no way “connected.’’ Other points worth considering are: easy identification in the ease of legal disputes lost heirs, etc., and the question of advantage to the police. This leads to the consideration of some scheme by which all would be required to furnish their number upon demand; with a penalty for giving a fraudulent number; some further scheme for detecting fraud; and some system providing for the identification of those too ignorant to be entrusted with the keeping of a number. Fraud would have to be contended with then, as now, but fraud in the matter of identity would be more easily detected in the case of numbers, or rather numbers added to names, than in the case of names alone; for it is not proposed to do away with names but to give numbers in addition to names. Although this scheme for bringing in the whole population would be more complete, more useful, and probably the more easily worked, I would suggest to those who think it too extreme, the consideration of some less comprehensive scheme, say one that might be voluntary; for the usefulness of such registration as is suggested would not be destroyed by reason of its circumscribed adoption. On the contrary its usefulness would be commensurate with the extent of its adoption. If a bureau were established at the national capital for the purpose of receiving voluntary registrations and of promulgating the scheme, it is probable that national registration would shortly become hon- orable and sought after. The better classes would feel it an advan- tage to escape from the ranks of the “unrecorded”, to join those who would have a place in the national records and history of their coun- 32 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE try; and this would be from the beginning a gain of constantly increas- ing value. The less comprehensive scheme, however, does not appear to me as being either so good or so workable as the scheme to bring in the whole population. There is perhaps no more important subject than that of improv- ing the human race in respect to a sound mind in a sound body, and this subject is being largely discussed at the present time. After discussion should come action; and intelligent action must be founded on reliable information. It appears to me that the system of regis- tration proposed will do more than anything else towards accu- mulating in the course of time a large fund of the very information desired. Whatever use future generations may see fit to make of such infor- mation, we can at least perform some share of our duty in the great work by endeavoring to accumulate it. Whilst numbers are so superior to names for the purpose of iden- tification and as an index to statistical compilations, names are no less important, and it might be well to give some consideration to improving our system of nomenclature. At present, as it is customary for children to be called by the sur- name of the father, the mother’s name is completely dropped out of use, and frequently out of recollection. Our names in consequence only indicate one-half of our immediate ancestry. A suggestion I would offer for discussion is that our surname should be a compound of the last name of our father preceded by the last maiden name of our mother. This compound name might be established and the system main- tained by requiring it to be written in full in every case where a legal signature is demanded. The last name of the compound would be adhered to from gener- ation to generation as at present, but the first name of the compound would change in each generation to correspond with the last maiden name of the mother; thus, supposing a Mr. Smith married a Miss Jones, his children would be known as Jones-Smith and the children of his son, say Tom Jones-Smith, who married Miss Casy-Brown would be known as Brown-Smith. In some of our rural municipalities settled in the early days by a few families who have multiplied and filled the neighborhood, inter- marriage between relatives is frequent and is sometimes continued to an uudesirable extent; and this is often done without the evil beng BULLARD: REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON HEREDITY OF EPILEPSY 33 recognized by the contracting parties, or their parents, from the fact that there is nothing in the names to show the connection when it comes in on the female side of the pedigree. A McKay may marry a Casy, and on the face of it the union show no fault; but it might be a Casy-McKay marrying a McKay-Casy and under this system of naming a relationship would at once be suggested. If MeKay were to marry his cousin McKay, as is not infrequent, and again McKay junior the son of these cousins were to marry in turn his cousin Mc- Kay, this last marriage, although much more objectionable than the first, would appear to be about the same; but under the system of naming suggested the first would read, say, Casy-McKay to Jones- McKay, while in the latter case it would read McKay-McKay to say Brown-McKay, or possibly McKay-McKay to McKay-McKay, which would at once draw attention to the likelihood of undesirable consanguinity. We frequently see now the maiden name of the mother given as a middle name to one of the family, but we seldom see it given to all the children. The question suggested for discussion is, whether it is worth trying to make this method of naming the rule instead of the exception; for it will no doubt be granted that some system that will indicate the mother as well as the father is desirable. A summary of the suggestions amounts to a number for the pur- pose of exact identification, etc. a Christian name for familiar use, and a compound surname indicating both the parents. REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON HEREDITY OF EPILEPSY. Wiui1am N. Buuuarp, Chairman. Everett Fioop, Secretary. K. E. SourHarp. J. Munson. The Committee on Heredity of Epilepsy was notified of its for- mation in the summer of 1910 and held a meeting very promptly afterward. The situation was discussed and circulars were sent out to those persons who were most competent to give us the infor- mation desired. The four questions asked and the replies received were as follows: 1. Are you acquainted with any instance where a non-epileptic child has come from two epileptic parents? Have these parents also epileptic offspring? Eleven replied in the negative and three in the affirmative. 3 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE 2. Please give cases you have known where an offspring with one epileptic parent has been free from epilepsy. Facts about children in the family, etc. Six replied in the negative and seven in the affirm- ative. 3. Can you give one or more instances where an epileptic person can be shown to have had no epileptic inheritance (epileptic, insane, inebriate or allied condition in blood relation as parents, brothers and sisters, grandparents, uncles, aunts, first or second cousins, great- uncles, great-aunts, children? Nine replied in the negative and eleven in the affirmative. 4. Can you cite the case of any epileptic person whose ancestry ean be traced with almost absolute accuracy for three generations? Preferably cite cases with two or more epileptics in one family. Eleven replied in the negative and five in the affirmative. Another consultation of the committee was held and it was thought advisable to try to get more explicit statements from certain ones who answered the questions. This inquiry is now under way. The results of the work of our field worker have been very satis- factory. It appears that we shall in time be able to trace out certain families in which there is a hereditary tendency to epilepsy. This work will be carried on and full detailed reports given in due time. THE KARAKUL BREED OF SHEEP C. C. Youne Goodnight, Texas The Arabi or Karakul sheep has its origin in the Khanate of Bok- hara, Central Asia, and belongs to the long-wool family from which all broadtail varieties descend. For centuries Arabi bucks have been smuggled into Afghanistan, Persia, Turkestan, China, Palestine, Syria, Asia Minor and Egypt and because of the ignorance of the natives, who seem to have no conception of proper breeding have been crossed with native sheep of the long-wool, short-wool and hairy classes, which in all of those countries belong to the most inferior type of domestic sheep imaginable. Were it not for the fact that the Arabi strain was from time to time injected into the native sheep of the above-named countries, their sheep industry to-day would amount to absolutely nothing. As the Arabi is essentially a desert animal, and able to withstand any amount of hardship, evi- Youne: THe Karakut BREED OF SHEEP on dently not minding the intense heat in the summer nor the severe cold in the winter, often going for days without food and water, it ean readily be seen why the people living in the arid countries of Central Asia found it advantageous to cross their native sheep with the Arabi, which is the heaviest sheep known. The barren semi- mountainous country of Bokhara in which the Arabi thrives cer- tainly does not show much evidence of grass, except here and there Fig. 1. UnBorn Havr-BREED KARAKUL SHROPSHIRE. Obtained before fur shows figures. Object was to obtain unborn Karakul- Shropshire velvet with figures. in the small valleys, and nature has made it possible for this animal to store in a short time large quantities of fat in its immense tail, weighing from 25 to 50 pounds, upon which it draws for sustenance when necessity demands it, and these properties are in a large measure transmitted to the offspring resulting from crossing the Arabi with the native sheep. 36 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE One has to eat the mutton of the Arabi but once to realize that it has absolutely no sheepy taste, but possesses a delicious and very appetizing flavor, that has made “‘shashlik”’ a famous dish among the epicures of Europe and Asia. When, therefore, an Asiatic possesses a flock of inferior common sheep with the musk-like flavor of the Merino sheep or the goat family, and seeks to get an increase in weight and a hardiness capable of withstanding the intensely cold winters of a country like, say, Afghanistan, he naturally turns to the Arabi family, knowing well that with even a 25 per cent of Karakuld injection this musklike flavor can be overcome. The Arabi lamb before birth, or a few days after, is a most intensely black-pigmented animal. It has a high luster, giving it the appear- ance of the richest of black figured velvet, with tight curls more or less evenly distributed. The pigment is practically not affected by the rays of the sunlight, which is, however, not the case with the commercial Arabi fur obtained by crossing the Karakul with common sheep, of which it is absolutely necessary to dye the skins. It is this fact that made Leipzig and its immense dyeing industry famous. There are two classes of Arabis, the small and the large variety. In my opinion the small Arabi is the original wild, broadtailed sheep, from which all other broadtail varieties origmate. They are always born black, and later become gray. The head is narrow and the face elongated; head-line curved with small ears. The feet are thin, as is the case with all wild animals of the ovine class. The tail is not very long, but broad, and triangular in shape, and they are all horned, with whitish spots on the head, tail, feet, and both sides. This sheep is said never to have existed anywhere but in the mountainous sec- tion of Bokhara. The tail not being as large as in the large Arabi would explain why these animals have been able to mate without assistance. The animal certainly has the appearance of a wild sheep and in every way resembles it. They are probably a little heavier than the American Shropshire. The large Arabi has a massive head, short face, nose-line bent, ears pendulous and quite large, with thick strong feet, especially the hind legs, with an immense S-shaped tail reaching to the ground, and when they are at all fat the tail drags, and in exceptional cases it has to be supported, which is done by placing it on a two-wheeled cart. Like the small variety, they have stiff hair on the front head and lower portion of all four extremities, but are not horned, nor have they the white spots mentioned of the other variety. Quite often they have auburn lambs. The Tartar Youne: THE KARAKUL BREED OF SHEEP ae authorities think that this class resulted from crossing the small variety with some big, long-wool short-tailed white or auburn sheep of Bokhara. If that is the case I cannot understand why there is such a difference in the size and shape of the tail. These two classes have been crossed, and in many instances it is almost impossible to select. typical specimens representing either class. Fie. 2. HatF-BrEED KAarRAKUL-MERINO. A practical fur, but lacking in luster; known in Russia as peasant fur. The fifteen head which I brought to this country belonged to both classes, and some of them no doubt are crosses between the two, notwithstanding the fact that we have tried hard to avoid such a election. I have, however, only one ram which comes anywhere near having the enormous tail with which many of the large variety 38 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE are encumbered. It is very difficult to drive those with an immense tail and I was afraid of losing them on account of the iong trip. The fur of the smaller Arabi is superior to the other kind, which again strengthens my belief that the small Karakul is the original wild broadtail above mentioned. On account of the small number of full-blood Arabis (it is esti- mated that there are not over 5,000 full-blood Arabis in Bokh«ura) very few of them are ever killed and what few Arabi skins are per- mitted to be exported seldom ever come into the possession of any- one except the richest classes of the nobility of Asia and Europe; those less fortunate have to content themselves with the commercial furs, such as Persian lamb, Astrakhan, Krimmer, and Afghan (the last is known in America as Karakul). The Afghanistans deserve the credit for producing the first and the best commercial Arabi fur and I am completely at a loss to understand why Persia is getting the credit. It is probably due to the fact that the crafty Persians have for years bought up the best products in Afghanistan and after making a good profit have disposed of them to the European merchants at Tashkend, whence they go to Nishni Novgorod, the old capital of the former Russian republic of Novgorod, whose commerce extended into Turkey, Greece, Persia, and even India at a time when the Teu- tons and Anglo-Saxons were still barbarians. The commercial Arabi fur known as Persian lamb, Astrakhan, Krimmer, and Afghan is the result of breeding the Karakul to cer- tain species of common native sheep of Central Asia. The natives have learned from many years of experience that producing sheep for fur purposes gives them twice or thrice the profit that they could derive from wool and mutton only. As the lambs are killed the first few days after birth, the mother ewes are permitted to lamb twice yearly and as the skins bring anywhere from $4 to $10 each, it is easy to calculate the breeding value of an Arabi buck. For about thirty days after the lamb has been killed the mother ewes are milked and a delicious cheese is produced, known as “‘brinza,’”’ which brings from 20 to 30 cents a pound, and this alone pays the expenses inci- dental to the breeding of the sheep, where labor is as cheap as is the case in Bokhara. The meat of the lambs is also an item worthy of consideration. We have yet to learn in this country that chops from very young lambs are very good indeed to eat, especially when properly broiled and served en brochette. An excellent fur is obtained by crossing a half or three-quarter- bred Karakul ram with the long-wooled sheep known as ‘“‘ Roman- Youne: THe KARAKUL BREED OF SHEEP 39 ovskaja,”’ resembling the black-faced Highland. In the last few years Russia has produced a large quantity of this class of fur, which finds its way to Nishni Novgorod, and there is sold for Persian lamb, with which it compares very favorably. Russians are beginning to realize that the English breeds, as the Lincolnshire, Leicester, Cots- wold, and especially the Shropshire, which possess a luster almost Fie. 3. A Gray Fur 75 PER cENT MERINO-LONGHAIR AND 25 PER CENT KARAKUL. equal to the Angora goat, give a fur far superior to anything that Asia can produce. Experiments conducted by such well-known breed- ers as Goodnight, Albright, and others prove conclusively that we can excel in beauty and luster the imported Persian lambskins that are sold in the United States. The writer’s experience is limited to the Lincolns, Shropshires, and Merinos, and those interested may exam- 40) AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE ine the skins produced on my ranch in northwest Texas. The Kara- kul-Merino cross possesses sufficient luster to be considered salable and could be sold by farmers for $2 or $3 a skin, which is not a bad price for a three-day-old lamb, especially when one considers that Fic. 4. 75 per cent KaRAKUL AND 25 PER CENT MERINO-LONGHAIR. thousands of them are knocked in the head annually on the big sheep ranches, on account of scant pasture, and the dam producing twins and not having sufficient milk. A three-quarter-bred Merino ought to bring a much better price, and I have a three-quarter-bred Youne: THE KARAKUL BREED OF SHEEP 4] Karakuld-Shropshire skin which has been priced at $10. The reason why the Shropshire produces a much prettier skin than the Merino is in my opinion due to the fact that the Shropshire stands between the tight-wool and the long-wool sheep. There is, however, no comparison between a half-bred Karakul-Lincolnshire and a three-quarter-bred Karakuld-Shropshire, and if we wish to excel in luster the best of so-called Persian lamb-skins we must confine ourselves entirely to Fic. 5. 50 PER CENT KARAKUL AND 50 PER CENT SHROPSHIRE. This is a magnificent fur, but inferior by far to half-breed Karakul-Lincolnshire. the long-wool sheep. In my opinion the Lincolns produce the best fur, although the difference in luster between the young Lincoln and Cotswold lamb is hardly sufficiently perceptible to entitle one to a positive statement. It is, however, the opinion of some of the men connected with the U. S. Department of Agriculture, which is now seriously considering the advisability of conducting its own experi- 42 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE ments, and for which purpose I have agreed to furnish them with some of my full-blood Arabi rams, that the Leicester and Shropshire will give more luster than any of the other long-wool sheep; but this remains to be determined. I do not believe that we can produce Afghan fur in this country, as it requires a hairy sheep, closely resem- bling the Mexican goat, which is indigenous to northwestern Turkes- tan and Afghanistan. It has been suggested to me by the Bureau of Animal Industry that the Barbadoes sheep may furnish us the missing link, and after seeing them I have become convinced that this Iria. 6. A Maanirrcenr Fur Suprrror tro ASTRAKHAN; 50 PER CENT) KARAKUL, 25 PER CENT Corswoup, AND 25 PER CENT Briack-Facrep HicHLAND. class of sheep will produce a dark brown fur, which may or may not be superior to the Afghan. As the Barbadoes sheep is brown instead of white, which is the color of the Afghan sheep, I doubt very much if we can produce a black offspring. When a Karakule ram is crossed with any white sheep the offspring is black. A half-breed Karakul generally gives us also a black skin, although this is not always the case, and often the fur is dark gray, resembling a black silver fox. A quarter-bred Karakul, long-wooled, Youne: THe KARAKUL BREED OF SHEEP 43 is gray, producing what is known as Krimmer fur, its price depending entirely upon the amount of luster it possesses; but it is safe to say that the average skin produced by crossing the half-breed Karakul-Lincoln bucks with any of our long-wool sheep will bring $5. This, however, is not the only advantage gained. By injecting 25 per cent of Arabi into any of our native sheep we unquestionably Fie. 7. ArcHan Fur; 50 PER CENT KARAKUL AND 50 PER CENT COMMON AFGHAN. produce a heavier sheep with a far superior quality of mutton, and one that is a great deal hardier. This has been amply demonstrated by a number of breeders who have crossed the Merino with a Persian Broadtail, of which there are several hundred in the United States, and the best of which contain from 25 to 50 per cent of Karakul blood. In one instance Persian Broadtail bucks, that should properly be 44 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE called half-breed Karakul-Shropshires, were sold to a breeder in New Mexico who crossed them again with Shropshires and sold some of the male offspring to W. W. Burch, owner of the American Sheep Breeders’ Magazine, who has a splendid sheep farm in northern Michigan. He crossed these bucks, which could not possibly be considered more than quarter-bred Karakuls, with Delaney Merinos and with Lincoln Delaneys, and this is what he has to say: Fic. 8. YEARLING Fut, BLoop Karakut Ewe. A year ago last fall we bred a Broadtail ram to Delaneys and Lincoln Delan- eys. The lambs were a marvel both in size and constitution. They grew rap- idly, and in August some of them were larger than their mothers, and went through the most severe drought we have experienced in years, and while the other lambs fell off rapidly in flesh those containing Broadtail blood not only held their own but gained right through the dry season, which lasted for about two months. There was absolutely no grass, and the sheep were obliged to Youne: THE KARAKUL BREED OF SHEEP 45 browse, getting what they could in a burnt-over and cut-over timber country. They seemed to defy cold weather and snow, always preferring to stay out in the storms and lie around in thesnow. The mutton proved to be wonderfully sweet, and the finest I have evereaten. J am satisfied that the fat-tailed sheep will play a very important réle in our sheep husbandry, and if you ean get your Karakui crosses introduced it strikes me that the sheepmen will find not only great profit in wool and mutton, but in fur as well. The introduction of the Karakul sheep into the United States presents many difficulties, chiefly due to the fact that the fanatical Fie. 9. Furu Buoop Karaxut Bucks; LowpEN ON RIGHT BELONGS TO THE LARGE CLASS. FASSIT ON LEFT BELONGS TO INTERMEDIATE TYPE. Bokharans resent the exportations of the full-blood Arabi, and few of them have ever been taken out of their country. Most all broad- tails that are taken out of Bokhara are sold to foreigners as full-blood Karakuls, when in fact they do not contain more than 50 or 75 per cent of Karakul blood, and belong to a type known as Shirazi, Doozboy, and Zigai, and whilst the Russians have attained wonderful success by crossing this class with their native sheep they do not 46 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE begin to give the results obtained from the full-blood Arabis. It would be interesting indeed to ascertain what class of common sheep were used in the production of these three types of broadtails, but there is no history, and one can only surmise they belong to the long- wool family, although in some instances the soft underwool occas- ionally seen would lead one to believe that the tight-wool family | may have contributed its share. If Persia, Afghanistan, northwest- ern and southwestern Russia are having such wonderful success with the Shirazi, Doozboy, and Zigai, why should we not be able to produce a far superior American broadtail, especially when one takes into consideration the fact that no Asiatic long-hair of the non-broad- tail variety possesses the luster of our Lincolns and Cotswolds? As Bokhara is considered as an infected country, chiefly on account of surra, it is very difficult to obtain permission from the Depart- ment of Agriculturé to import Karakuls into the United States, and if one does succeed they are kept in quarantine for months, whichis very expensive. If the writer succeeded in bringing the first flock to this country it is all due to the kindness of ex-President Roosevelt, whose personal letter accomplished wonders in Asia. A ruinous sum, amounting to thousands, was spent to bring the first fifteen head to the United States. ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE OF LIVE STOCK PRODUCTION Herspert W. Mumrorp University os Illinois, Champaign, Illinois Sufficient publicity has not been given to the magnitude and impor- tance of live stock production in the United States. One needs only to familiarize himself with the facts with reference to the part this industry plays in the world’s commerce, its rational place in the economy of the farm, and its importance as an economic fact in the maintenance of an enticing, permanently profitable agriculture, to become an enthusiast as to its future possibilities. According to the Federal Census of 1900, the capital invested in live stock in the United States is greater than in any other class of property except farm lands. Mumrorp: Live Srock PRopucTION 47 Class of Property Value in U. S.* 1900 armen Gcwith 1mprovements.«.......c.eeeaee s+ += st aes. ears $16 ,674,690,247 Lt S SATE Oe eae aR URI pl PR 3,078,050,041 Mmaplements and machinery]:..:. 0.5 seemed oe cscs Boe 761,261,550 andsana: kindreadiproguctst.: oy. Acs eee ae ee eee 1,750,811,817 PReomeniy Are AB.. istocursans 6 3. fe Re eae ahs 1,081,961,248 ironsangysteel and them productsh. ... s2.se.ue. ce ae- ena 983,821,918 bumberand ics mManubachuresy:.,.... 2:14 .0a sex unknown, left-handed 113 114 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE have been heterozygous with respect to the factors that determine preference for use of one or the other hand. Possibly many so-called right-handed individuals are heterozygous in regard to these factors. Fig. 5 Fig. 5. Here again two individuals (females in this case) appear to have acted as carriers of a factor transmitted from the father and through them to their children. If we assume here, as we must on a Mendelian stand, that the mother was homozygous with respect to the left-handed character and the father either homo- or heterozy- gous with respect to the other member of the assumed pair of alle- lomorphs, the absence of left-handedness in the second generation is disconcerting but not necessarily subversive of the Mendelian scheme. Assuming again that both parents of the two third-generation child- ships are heterozygous, the appearance of a left-handed child in each meets a reasonable Mendelian expectation. As an example of the range of data gathered in every case where possible, the following account of the male of the smaller childship will suffice: Throws ball with left hand; kicks football with left foot; uses knife and fork as do right-handed persons, but holds spoon in the left hand; writes with right hand (though he began to use left, but was forced to change to right by teachers in lower grades of school) ; shoots gun from left shoulder; shoots marbles with left hand; bats ball from right side of plate; holds drinking glass with right hand; holds pencil on left ear; plays tennis with left hand; starts on running track with right foot at line. Many other cases simply parallel this one with unimportant vari- ations. The point to be emphasized here is a condition of general left-sidedness (especially left-leggedness, contrary to Sibley’s equi- librium theory) coincident with left-handedness. Fig. 6. The affected individual here is a professor who has taken a deep interest in his own condition and that of his daughter (both inveterately left-handed) and has made a scientific study of the ances- try of himself and wife. He assures me that for three generations JORDAN: INHERITANCE OF LEFr-HANDEDNESS Ls Fia. 6 back on his side and two generations back in his wife’s ancestry no left-handedness has anywhere appeared. Here again seems to be a real case of a mutation (spontaneous variation) which again appeared in one of the two offspring. > Fig. 7 Fig. 7. This case is interesting in that half the childship (the two halves of opposite sex)’ of apparently unaffected parents are left- handed. The family explains the case by the fact that the boys had a left-handed nurse, the girls a different nurse. Thus far, then, we seem to have discovered the influence of at least three factors in the production of left-handed individuals (the con- dition being probably of at least three degrees or grades of intensity): (1) heredity; (2) spontaneous variation; (3) imitation. More will be said of these three types below. Fia, 8 Fig. 8. This pedigree shows direct transmission through three generations. 4Tn each of four other childships (comprising a total of 11 girls and 8 boys), which have since come to my notice, the lett-handed individuals are all of the same sex (three females each in three cases). 116 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE Fie. 9 Fig. 9. This shows the prevalence of left-handedness in a particu- lar family to the extent of approximately half the childship. Having recognized a factor of imitation, the argument might be made that the prevalence of left-handedness in certain families is due to the opera- tion of this factor exclusive of heredity. I am convinced that this is not a valid argument. Families (at least of whites) where left- handedness has appeared make very vigorous efforts to repress a similar tendency in new members. Fie. 10 Fig. 10. This case is teresting from the fact that the childship here is a pair of identical twins. Such twins (the result most prob- ably of an independent development of each blastomere of the two- cell stage) may be partially ‘mirror images’ of each other, as appears here to be the case regarding the use of the hand and possibly its anatomical basis. However, an attempt to verify this hypothesis has failed. Four other pairs of ‘identical twins (so adjudged on grounds of superficial similarity) are now known to me in all of which both members are right-handed. Fie. 11 JORDAN: INHERITANCE OF LEFT-HANDEDNESS 117 Fig. 11. This case is most important in that the variation in ques- tion is very general. Three months ago I knew oaly the history up to the last generation represented. The child of this generation was too young to have shown any decided tendency one way or the other. Judging from the family histories, one would expect the mother to be homozygous and the father to be heterozygous (imperfect domin- ant). If this were so at least half of the children of the family should be left-handed. I have just received a letter from the father stating that the child is ‘‘decidedly left-handed.’ This case alone, I believe, justifies this limited collection of data. Families like this one, if fully recorded at some central office and followed during future years, may yield important information regarding the heredi- tary transmission of human characteristics in general. U U U Fie. 12 Fig. 12. This case is interesting again in that the childship of six 1s equally divided between affected and unaffected individuals. Fie. 13 Fig. 13. The history of this case was kindly supplied to me by Dr. W. Thalhimer (instructor in pathology). It gives additional proof for the hypothesis that in left-handed ‘individuals the controlling center is located in the right hemisphere (instead of the left as in right- handed persons). In 1861 M. Broca definitely assigned the posterior part of the third frontal convolution of the left hemisphere as the seat of articulate speech. Accordingly ataxic aphasia ordinarily occurs in association with right-handed hemiplegia. This case shows that in a left-handed individual the reverse condition obtains. In brief, 118 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE this man (he has two left-handed children) developed a complete left-sided hemiplegia coincident with a complete motor aphasia. Dr. Thalhimer’s notes are in part as follows: ‘The correlation of left hemiplegia —indicating a right-sided cerebral lesion and aphasia— suggested a contralateral displacement of Broca’s motor speech area, and this suggested a contralateral displacement of normal right- sided functions, and it was immediately discovered on questioning the patient’s family that he was and always had been left-handed.” ao Fic. 14 Fie. 15 Fie. 16 Fig. 14, 15, and 16 again show a carrier in the second generation given. Fia. 20 Fia. 18 Fie. 19 ; Fre. 21 Figs. 17, 18, 19, 20, and 21 again show direct transmission. JORDAN: INHERITANCE OF LErr-HANDEDNESS 119 U Fie. 22 Fig. 22 seems to show the influence of a great-grandmother car- ried “latent” in the direct line through two intermediate generations. Fia. 23 Fig. 23 shows transmission of this character through four suc- cessive generations, the last represented by an only son. Fic. 24 Fig. 24 (colored) is interesting as a case where a left-handed mother and a right-handed father have four left-handed children in a family of six. This is the “John” family discussed in the Davenports’ arti- cle on “Heredity of the Skin Pigmentation in Man.” 120 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE STATEMENTS OF RESULTS Among the left-handed university students, six (all inveterate) said they were the only persons so affected among all their connec- tions. This testimony together with cases Nos. 9 and 4 leaves no doubt, I believe, that left-handedness often arises spontaneously. Case No. 9 again shows that such mutation or variation is hereditary. Tabulating the childships of four or more individuals, the propor- tion of left-handedness to right-handedness is as 1:13. | | | | | CasE No. | @ ee | O CT) | | 68 8 ees fig SL he ee Oe ee a —— abe) 2 = 1 1 j! A ie 0 3. = 2 2 shi wale Bore on een ee eee 5 a 1 ne eM) Bee eR chal oaraniads Jar tite — 2 Ed RRR oe aA GEC Sass) bb GoanGoos ACs 1 1 1 1 2 hess 1 2 It 11 = 2 2 10 AE eos eee ey — 3 ; 3 13 — 2 3.) bree aot oes |S eee ° os fo — rs as ) = a — we [o) 19 o7 The ratio of 16 left-handed students to a total body of 700 is about 2% per cent. Among the white pupils of the public school the proportion of left- handed to right-handed in affected families is as 39 to 79 or as 1 to 2... There is no evidence to support the opinion of some (e.g., Weber) that left-handedness is more prevalent among women. The proportion of affected males to females is as 1 to 1. This school is represeated by 604 males and 794 females (1,394). Thirty left- handed pupils here represent a ratio of about 2§ per cent, agreeing with the ratio for university students and Hyrtl’s result for Euro- pean peoples in general. Summarizing the foregoing 49° white families in terms of heredity, we find the following modes of ‘‘transmission” represented in the frequency indicated: 5Including three families besides those of university students (16) and public school pupils (30). JORDAN: INHERITANCE OF LEFT-HANDEDNESS 1 by Ai | Number of Case 1. From grandmother to granddaughter.........:........-. 1 Dae romeTan gm ocnen tO, gTaAndsoneee seer eee ee eee 4 Ss Prom grandfather to granddaughter. ...))...3.<...:....55 3 1 rome srandiather tO GTanGgson..... 52.8 4.0 sarees ira da Lees 1 Deeenrommother todaughter..-o5-e coer ees ere eee 3 GePLEEOM FN OLUAEL-bONSONS acerca eee te ae Oe no aes 4 Meamirornaar Cher FO CaUghter, :c/s.tisi. ade ogneke wee eevee 2 SaEUL OMe h Cr sbORSOM says okt. recede me Raye eae oes 7 The following is a summary of the chief facts gathered from 29 colored childships: (a) In 5 cases either an uncle or an aunt is left-handed; (b) in 7 cases one parent is left-handed; (c) in 17 cases neither parent is left-handed; (d) proportion of left-handed individ- uals to right-handed is as 29 to 25; (e) the 29 school children included 15 males and 14 females; including the whole childship the propor- tion of affected males to affected females is as 17 to 18; including par- ents, uncles and aunts the proportion is 21 to 25; (f) the colored pupils included 287 males and 381 females (668); the 29 left handed pupils thus represent 43% per cent. In the three sets of data the proportion of left-handed males to left- handed females is approximately equal. The proportion of left- handed colored children to right-handed (29 to 25) as shown in the above colored childships is probably not absolutely correct. It agrees well, however, with the high percentage (43) of left-handed children when the entire school population is taken into account. I believe there is no escaping the conclusion that left-handedness is at least twice as frequent among colored as among white families. The less active repressive efforts counteracting the factor of imita- tion may probably be responsible for the high percentage among colored children. As explaining the above high ratio of left-handed- ness to right-handedness (29 to 25), I wish to emphazise the fact that among the 29 childships there are 7 cases of an only child, and this is left-handed (in 10 cases the entire childship was not given). This fact indicates either great infant mortality or a low birth rate. In fact, from what I have seen, I should say that both conditions more generally prevail; the second, contrary to the usual opinion, more especially. It remains to explain briefly the method employed in collecting the facts regarding the pupils of the public school. The following questionaire was prepared and given to each teacher: Determine the number of left-handed children in the Charlottesville city schools, and the degree of left-handedness in each case; i.e., what do left- handed children do with left hand and what with right hand. 122 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE Obtain answers to the following questions: Which foot is used in kicking? On which side is hair parted? Which eye is stronger? Comparative degree of intellectual capacity. Which hand is preferentially used for gestures? Which-of the parents is left-handed? Who among grandparents is left-handed? How many children in family? And how many are left-handed in any degree? Give sex of each. Who among the brothers and sisters of the parents of left-handed indi- viduals are left handed? 10. State additional matters of interest, and give total enrollment in school. BOSS eC Se bad In the great majority of cases the left foot was used for kicking. The returns regarding strength of eye showed an apparent equality respecting the number of right-eyed and left-eyed pupils. The sim- ple nature of the tests employed, however, may render this result of doubtful value. _As regards the intellectual capacity of left-handed compared with right-handed pupils no significant difference could be deduced from the report. I wish here to acknowledge my great indebtedness and to express sincere thanks to the teachers of the city schools and especially to the superintendent, Prof. J. G. Johnson, Ph.D., for the painstak- ing, thorough, and conscientious manner in which the investigations were conducted. Without this kindly coéperation the work would have been practically impossible. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSION The above detailed evidence is conclusive I. believe, that left- handedness is hereditary. In what way or by what principle this inheritance acts remains obscure. From the 22 more complete pedi- grees (of the 78 families studied), 6 childships (Nos. 2, 38, 9,11, 12, and 24) can be selected of four or more individuals where the propor- tion of left-handed to right-handed individuals is approximately equal (7.e., one less or one more than half in childships of more than four individuals). Tabulating these, the result shows an equal num- ber of right-handed and left-handed individuals. The significance of this proportion lies in the fact that it need not necessarily have been even, 7.¢e., the more than half need not necessarily have coun- terbalanced the less than half of the childships. This ratio (not as significant as desirable because selected) suggests the Mendelian JORDAN: INHERITANCE OF LEFT-HANDEDNESS 123 ratio of the formula above, or the condition that obtains by cross- ing a heterozygote (RZ) with a homozygote recessive (LL). The writer does not however delude himself—nor does he wish to leave the impression of attempting to mislead his readers in this matter— that left-handedness even appears (on the basis of the limited data presented) to follow Mendalian principles of inheritance. The sole step of prime importance he insists on at present is that the pheno- menon of left-handedness is hereditary in some way. The writer hopes that the inconclusiveness of this contribution on important points may be pardoned by reason of the preliminary character of the work; moreover, that the effort was justified because of the promise revealed, and the problems suggested in this field. Superficially considered, it seems a far cry from the inheritance of coat-color to that of such a subtle characteristic as left-handedness. The gap here is perhaps only as wide as between this characteristic and such apparently still more subtle characteristics as virtue, jus- tice, temperance, integrity, thrift, sagacity, ete—characteristics of prime significance for the future trend of human history—and if the former gap can be bridged by hereditary formulz, as seems pos- sible, why not the latter? Once the principles which govern the transmission of these highly desirable human qualities are known, their “fixation” in continually increasing numbers of individuals seems a comparatively easy problem. Facts regarding the conduct of the variation of left-handedness in heredity may reveal valuable information for the science of eugenics. Again, if a characteristic like left-handedness rests upon an anatom- ical variation (a hypothesis well supported by various facts) perhaps many other characteristics have a similar basis and are amenable to experimental methods of research and simple methods of control. The study of left-handedness also finally shows (on Mendelian assump- tions) the phenomenon of the “imperfection of dominance,” as revealed in numerous cases of congenital and acquired ambidexter- ity. Moreover, the apparent imperfect dominance would here seem to be due proximately to a more or less complete structural and func- tional symmetry of the cerebral hemispheres. BIBLIOGRAPHY AvupeEnino, E. 1907. L’homme droit, homme gauche et l'homme ambi- dextre. Arch. di. Psichiat., etc., Torino T, 28 : 23. Baupwin, J. M. 1890. Origin of Left-handedness. Science, p. 242. Batpwin, J.M. 1905. TheStory of theMind. D. Appleton & Co., New York. 124 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE BARDELEBEN, Karu. 1909. Ueber bilateral Assymmetry beim Menschen und bei hoheren Tieren. Anat. Anz., Erginzungsheft zum Bd. 34, p. 2. CunnincuaM, D. J. 1902. Right-handedness and Left-handedness. Journ, of the Anthropol. Institute of Great Britain, vol. 32, p. 273. (B)? DarestE, M. 1885. Hypothese sur l’origine des droitiers et des gauchers Bull. de la Soc. d’Anthropol. de Paris, Mai 1885, p. 417. (B) Davenport, G. C. and C. B. 1910. Heredity of Skin Pigmentation in Man Am. Nat., vol. 44, Nos. 527-528. GauipPp. 1887. La droiterie et la gaucherie, sont elles fonctions de l’educa- tion ou de l’heredité? Compt. rend. Soc. de Biol., p. 519. GaRMAN, 8. 1891. Review of Wilson’s ‘‘The Right Hand,’’ ete. Nation, 53: 243. Gaurp, E. 1909. Ueber die Rechtshindigkeit des Menschen. Jena, G. Fischer. (B) GouLtp, G. M. 1908. Right-handedness and Left-handedness, ete. Lippin- cott, New York. Hyrr., J. 1871. Handbuch der topographischen Anatomie, 6 Aufl., Bd. 2, p. 805. (B) JorpAN, D.S. 1895. Des animaux, soni ils gauchers ou droitiers? Revue scientifique, ser. 4, T. 4, No. 28. Katscuer, L. 1907. Gelinxheit und Ambidextrie. Nord. u. Siid., Bresl., 120, S. 259. KeLioac, G. M. 1898. The Physiology of Right- and Left-handedness. Jour. Am. Med. Assoc., p. 356. Latres, L. 1907. Dexirismo e inancinismo in relaxione colle assimmetrie funzionali del cervello. Archi. di. Psichiat, ete. Torino, T. 28, 281. Lomsroso, C. 1903. Left-sidedness. No. Am., 177: 440. LuEDDECKENS, F. 1900. Rechts- und Linkshindigkeit. Leipzig, W. Engle- mann. (B) Mazeu. 1892. Pourquoi l’on est droitier? Paris. (B) MeRKEL, Fr. 1904. Die Rechts- und Linkshindigkeit. Wiesbaden. (B) Pyr-Smity, P. H. 1871. On left-handedness. Guy’s Hospital Report, vol. 16, p. 141. Rotscuitp. 1897. Zur Frage der Ursachen der Linkshindigkeit. Jahrbuch f. Psychiatrie, p. 332. (B) SipLEY, W. K. 1890. Left-leggedness. Nineteenth Cent., 27: 773. STEVENS, H. C. 1909. Review of Gould’s ‘‘Right-handedness and Left- handedness,”’ etc. Science, N. S., vol. 30., No. 762, p. 182. Van Brervuret, J. J. 1899. L’homme droit et ’ homme gauche. Revue Philos. de la France et de .’Etranger (Ribot), année 24, vol. 47. Paris. (B) Dr Varieny, H. 1902. L’homme droit et homme gauche. Le Temps, 12 Aout. (B) Weser, E. 1904. Eine Erklarung fiir die Art der Vererbung der Rechts- haindigkeit. Centralbl. f. Physiol., Bd. 18, No. 14. Weser, E. 1905. Ursachen und Folgen der Rechtshiindigkeit. Halles. (B) Witson, Sir D. 1891. The Right Hand; Left-handedness. Macmillan & Co. 2(B) =cited from Bardelaben. DISTRIBUTION OF IMPROVED SEED GRAIN IN KANSAS A. M. Tren Eyck Experiment Station, Fort Hays, Kan. I do not think the presentation of a paper on this subject before this body of breeders and scientists needs any excuse or explanation. I observe, however, that much of the effort of this organization has been directed towards the propounding and demonstration of theories and facts related to the breeding and improvement of plants. This is necessary and valuable work, but the establishing of breeding laws and the production of improved and pedigreed seed or plants has little immediate value to agriculture, unless the improved plant or high-bred seed is propagated in large amount and distributed among the farmers for planting. The distribution of improved seed is just as important as the breeding, and this is a subject too often neg- lected by scientific breeders and by the experiment stations. The writer’s method of breeding crops aims to make the work count, not only scientifically and on paper, but toward producing the real thing, the improved seed, in quantities sufficient to distribute to the farmers, so that they may at once have the benefit secured from grow- ing the better variety. Some practical system must be adopted in every State by which high-bred or pedigreed seed may be grown and placed in the care of responsible farmers for further multiplication and distribution. The testing of varieties and the breeding of crops by the experiment station has little value unless the farmer secures the improved seed and grows it in large areas, to replace seed of average or inferior quality. The method or methods of securing and distributing improved seed grain in Kansas may be briefly described as follows: 1. Many varieties of different kinds of standard crops are tested and compared at the State experiment stations, to prove their adapta- tion and productiveness, and the quality of their product. 2. The best producing varieties are improved and purified by careful hand selection in the field, and the seed is further improved by selection and grading. 3. Still further improvement and greater purity is secured by breeding the grain by the ‘‘ear-row” and ‘“‘head-row’’ methods, by which pedigreed strains may be established. 4. The improved grain is grown in separate fields in larger areas to produce seed grain for distribution. 125 126 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE 5. The seed grain tested by the experiment station is sold to the farmers, at their option or order, viz., the farmers voluntarily order and purchase the seed grain at the price fixed by the experiment station. 6. The seed grain which is offered for sale by the experiment sta- tion is advertised in different ways—through announcements in bulletins, by answering correspondence, by replies to inquiries pub- lished in farm papers and in local papers, and through the farmers’ institutes, corn shows, and State farmers’ meetings. During the last three years there has not been much need for advertising, since the demand for the ‘‘college-bred”’ seed grain has far exceeded the supply. 7. The improved seed grain has always been sold at a fair seed price, at least double the market value of the grain. 'The price varies somewhat, according to the improvement or breeding which the crop has received. Seed wheat has been sold at prices ranging from $1.40 to $2 per bushel. The selling price for seed corn has ranged from $1.50 to $5 per bushel, according to the breeding, variety, and grade of seed. There has been very little complaint from purchasers regarding the price of seed grain. The better farmers are willing to pay a good price for good seed. In fact, many prefer that the experiment station should charge a high price for improved seed, because this allows them to grow the crops and continue the distribution of the seed at good prices, usually a little less than those charged by the experiment station. The establishing of higher prices for well-bred seed grain than for scrub seed is placing the purebred seed business on the same plane as the purebred stock business, and there is just as good reason why a bushel of well-bred wheat which has been carefully and properly saved for seed should sell for double the market price as for a pure- bred calf or colt to sell for double or treble the value of a mixed breed or scrub. 8. Farmers who purchase seed from the experiment station are encouraged to keep the “college-bred” seed pure, grow it under favor- able conditions, and save the crop again for seed, and thus become further distributors of the improved seed grain. 9. A record is kept by the experiment station of each sale of well- bred seed, including the name and address of the purchaser, the date of his order, and the value, grade, and amount of seed purchased. The seed distribution work of the experiment station has continued now for six years. The larger part of the seed, however, has been Ten Eyck: ImprRoveD SEED GRAIN Tey distributed during the last three seasons. More than 25,000 bushels of well-bred seed of standard farm crops have been sold and distrib- uted by the experiment station, at Manhattan, and by the Ft. Hays branch experiment station, at Hays, including 15,000 bushels of seedwheat, 3,000 bushels of seed corn, 2,000 bushels of seed oats, barley, and emmer, 2,000 bushels of Kafir corn and broom corn, cane, and milo seed, and smaller quantities of flax, millet, cowpeas, and soy beans. 10. The experiment station gives some superintendence to the growing and saving of the crops for seed by farmers, by inspecting the fields when possible and by securing reports from each grower giving information regarding the variety, yield, purity, quality, and amount and price of seed grain which he will have for sale. 11. Published lists giving such data as named above have been prepared each fall and spring during the last three years, 1908, 1909, and 1910, and these lists are sent to those who inquire for seed grain. In this manner the experiment station has been able to assist in the continuing of the distribution of many thousands of bushels of “college-bred”’ seed wheat and seed corn. The writer estimates that 25,000 bushels of Kharkof seed wheat were distributed by this means in 1909, and Prof. L. A. Fitz, who now has special charge of the inspection of wheat fields and the listing of wheat growers, reports the sale and distribution of 60,000 bushels in 1910. Seventy-two farmers reporting listed 30,000 bushels of “college-bred” seed wheat for sale in 1909. Growers were listed from forty counties in the State. During the seed wheat campaign last summer 144 wheat fields were inspected by Professor Fitz and his assistants. Two thousand copies of list containing 162 names of farmers offering ‘college-bred”’ seed wheat for sale were distributed in answer to requests from inquirers. Each farmer on the seed-growers’ list was requested to supply certain information regarding his crop and keep a record of sales. Fifty-four of the listed wheat growers reported as requested. Their total sales amounted to nearly 30,000 bushels. The quantities sold by individual growers ranged from 10 bushels to 3,200 bushels. The average yield per acre in 1910, secured by growers reporting, was 22 bushels. This was an average increase over other wheat of 53 bushels per acre, or 333 per cent. Two million acres of winter wheat seeded in the fall of 1909, in Kansas, entirely winterkilled and were plowed up. The remaining 4,686,000 acres made an average yield of 12.8 bushels per acre. 128 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE Much of the wheat harvested had been severely damaged by winter- killing. The average yield per acre for the State in 1909 was 14.6 bushels. The average yield for the last ten years, 13.9 bushels. Much well-bred seed corn has also been distributed by this method. Seventy growers reporting listed over 10,000 bushels for sale in the spring of 1910, and reports indicate that the supply did not equal the demand. For the purpose of securing and giving information on the subject of crop improvement and seed distribution, the experiment station has published a number of bulletins, circulars, blank forms, lists of growers, etc., copies of which may be secured by those interested. 12. Another plan which is being developed proposes to distribute improved seed grain by means of the county demonstration farms, which are now being established in many counties in Kansas. The law passed in 1909 allows for the establishment of demonstration farms in connection with the county poor farm of each county at the option of the county commissioners and in codperation with the agri- cultural college. Seventeen demonstration farms have already been organized. The plan is to plant only improved or “college-bred”’ seed on these farms, save the crop for seed, and sell the surplus seed grain to the farmers in the county who may wish to purchase it at a price somewhat in advance of the ordinary seed price. Several of these farms have already been established and a few have raised a crop of purebred seed wheat which was sold for seed last fall. On the county farm in Barton County, Kansas, last year there was a field of 11 acres of Kharkof wheat that produced an aver- age of 45 bushels per acre, and every bushel was sold for seed to the farmers of the county at $1.50 per bushel. From five or six demon- stration farms in eastern Kansas last year the sales of well-bred seed corn aggregated over 1,200 bushels and sold at an average price of $1.50 per bushel. On these several farms the following crops have been grown for the production of seed to sell: Kharkof wheat, Kherson and Red Texas oats, and improved strains of Kafir corn and cane and several varieties of well-bred seed corn. No variety has been planted on any demonstration farm which did not have the approval of the professor of agronomy of the agricultural college. This method promises to be a very successful means of growing and distributing improved seed grain which will be especially adapted to local climatic and soil conditions. When the writer took charge of the agronomy work at the Kansas State Agricultural College in the fall of 1902, there was not a bushel Ten Eyck: IMPROVED SEED GRAIN 129 of well-bred seed grain of any kind on the experiment station farm. The work of variety testing and crop improvement by seed selection was begun in 1903. As soon as it was shown that certain varieties were superior, or as soon as pure seed of some of the bettcr producing varieties could be produced, these varieties were grown on larger areas and the surplus seed was sold and distributed among te farmers of Kansas. A small amount of seed grain was distributed in 1904 and 1905, being mainly seed wheat from seed which was tested for several years in the State, at the United States Government Codperative Experiment Station, at McPherson. In 1906, a larger amount of good seed grain was distributed, including some well-bred seed corn. The breeding of corn by the “‘ear-row”’ method was begun in 1903 and 1904, and the breeding of wheat and other grains by the “head-row” method was begun in 1906 and 1907. The improved varieties pro- duced by seed selection and breeding, especially of corn, Kafir corn, and cane, were propagated as rapidly as possible, and the amount of well-bred seed grain distributed has steadily increased each year. During the interval of five or six years since this seed distribution work began, the agronomy department of the agricultural college! has distributed over 5,000 bushels of seed wheat, nearly 3,000 bushels of seed corn, more than 2,000 bushels of seed oats, barley, and emmer, nearly 2,000 bushels of cane, Kafir corn, milo maize, and broom corn seed, and smaller quantities of seed of other crops, such as flax, millet, cowpeas and soy beans. The total quantity of well-bred seed dis- tributed amounts to more than 12,000 bushels. Similar work has been carried on at the Ft. Hays branch experiment station. More than 10,000 bushels of improved seed wheat has been distributed by that station. Over 6,000 bushels of pure Kharkof seed wheat was distributed last fall, 1910. The Ft. Hays station has also sold and distributed several hundred bushels of good seed of corn, Kafir, and cane, and a thousand bushels or more of pure seed of oats, barley, and durum spring wheat, or in total an amount nearly equal to that distributed by the agronomy department. This seed grain has been sold largely in small quantities as stated above; hence, the improved seed has been distributed widely to thousands of farmers in every part of the State and to a considerable number of farmers in other States. By the method deseribed— 1The writer had charge of this department from December 1, 19)2, to June 1, 1910, when he was transferred to Ft. Hays branch experiment station, as superintendent. 130 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE encouraging the farmers to save their crops for seed and sell the sur- plus seed—large quantities of “‘college-bred’”’ seed, amounting to several thousand bushels of seed corn and many thousand bushels of seed wheat, having been distributed and planted. The wheat area of Kansas averages about 7 million acres annually. The writer estimates that 2 million acres of Kharkof wheat—the variety most widely distributed by the experiment station—was planted in the State last fall, 1910. The comparative tests at the experiment station and the reports of many growers prove that under equal conditions, where hard red winter wheat is adapted, the Kharkof will yield from 25 to 30 per cent more grain per acre than ordinary scrub wheat, which is still planted on a large area. The Kansas wheat crop in 1910 was so severely injured by winterkilling in parts of the State that the acre yield or the whole State was reduced below the average, and the result of planting improved seed was not apparent. The possible increase in our yield of wheat in 1911, due to the distri- bution of better seed, may be estimated at not less than 6 million bushels. In the distribution of improved seed corn an important agency has assisted which I have neglected to mention. This is the “boys’ corn contests,’ work which is carried on under the college extension department. Thousands of boys have secured improved seed corn by taking part in this contest, and the variety of corn by proving its superior quality has usually remained on the farm, the farmers often purchasing more seed of the same variety, in order to plant larger fields. The instruction at the agricultural college in the regular courses and through the boys’ and men’s short courses, through the farmers’ institutes, experiment station bulletins, and the agricultural press, has also given efficient aid in the progress of seed improvement. The average acre yield of corn in Kansas for the last ten years has been about 21 bushels. The corn crop of 1910 was severely injured in parts of the State by very hot weather and drouth in July and by chinch bugs, and the acre yield was below the average, only 19 bushels. In 1909, the acre yield was 20 bushels, but 200 growers reported an average yield from “college-bred” seed of 36 bushels per acre. The writer estimates that from one-third to one-half the total area of the State, or about 3 million acres, will be planted with well-bred seed corn next spring, and it is not extravagant to estimate an average increase in yield, due to the better seed, of 5 bushels per acre on this area, or a possible increase in the Kansas corn crop in 1911 of 15 Tren Eyck: ImMprROvED SEED GRAIN 131 million bushels. This is not speculation, but a careful estimate deduced from facts. Improved seed distribution and the education on crop improvement which has accompanied it have produced another very important result, viz., the farmers have become awakened not only to the neces- sity of improving the crops, but to the necessity of improving the soil fertility and practicing better farming methods. The distribution of improved seed grain in Kansas, therefore, marks the beginning of a new agricultural area which will be noted for high crop yields and great agricultural prosperity. Kansas has already made a national reputation through her im- proved seed distribution; in fact, this reputation is world-wide. It actually appears that the work done in Kansas along this line is noted and talked about and written about more outside of the State than within the State. Inquiries and orders for seed wheat and seed corn have come to the experiment station from all over the United States and from several foreign countries, including Australia, South Africa, and several of the countries of Europe and South America. A year ago the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station shipped 50 bushels of improved Turkey, Red wheat to the Transvaal government of South Africa. A bushel of seed of each of ten varieties of Kansas- grown corn was shipped to the government experiment station, at Brisband, Queensland, Australia, in the spring of 1910. Exchanges of seed wheat and other seed grain have been made with several experiment stations in Russia. In 1908 the experiment station in- southern Alberta, Canada, ordered 60 bushels of our Kharkof and improved Turkey Red wheat, which was sent with charges of $2 per bushel, rather expensive seed wheat, but one of the best invest- ments that Alberta ever made. This well-bred Kansas wheat yielded over 50 bushels per acre, or 9 bushels more than the best Alberta red varieties in 1909, on the experiment station farm at Lethbridge. I am informed that thousands of bushels of wheat from this seed have been distributed and planted by Alberta farmers. The writer has recently been invited to deliver addresses on this subject before the National Corn Show, and American Breeders Association, and at the meeting of the Council of American Grain Exchanges. It is evident that this work in Kansas has created great interest and is attracting much attention in other States and other countries. The improvement of crops by breeding and selection is primarily the work of the experiment station, and the experiment station should 132 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE be the source and first distributor of well-bred seed. But the amount of seed supplied by the experiment station is necessarily small, and the farmers who secure the better seed must grow it carefully, keep it pure, and continue the distribution, in order that great and rapid benefit may result from the work of the experiment station. The permanent improvement of crops rests with the farmers who shall continue the growing and distribution of improved seed. AN EXPERIMENT IN FUR-SEAL CONSERVATION Barton W. EVERMANN U. S. Bureau of Fisheries, Washington, D. C. For a quarter of a century the “fur-seal question” has been one of the most serious problems with which the Department of State at Washington has had to deal. So long as the killing of seals was con- fined to the land on which they haul out during the breeding season there was no difficulty; but when certain people in British Columbia discovered that fur-seals could be killed in the open sea in sufficient numbers to make the business very profitable, then trouble began. This was in the early eighties. Pelagic sealing, as killing seals in the open sea is called, developed rapidly and it was only a few years until the very existence of the fur-seal herd as a commercial entity was seriously threatened. The killing of seals on the islands can be, and always has been, carefully regulated by the Government. In the first place, it must be understood that the fur-seal is a polygamous animal, like sheep, cattle, or domestic poultry. While the sexes are born in approxi- mately equal numbers, one male to every thirty to fifty females is adequate for breeding purposes. The surplus twenty-nine to forty- nine males are not needed and ean be killed without in the least endan- gering the existence of the herd. There is no more reason for refrain- ing from killing each year the surplus male seals than there would be in a stockman saving all the rams or roosters on the ranch. It has therefore been the policy of the Government never to kill any female seal but to kill each year the surplus young male or bachelor seals after reserving a sufficient number for breeding purposes. In this way the Government was able to conserve the herd at high efficiency and at the same time permit the killing of about 100,000 young male seals each year, yielding an annual revenue to the Govern- EVERMANN: FuR-SEAL EXPERIMENT 133 ment of about $317,500. That number now would yield a revenue of more than a million dollars annually. But pelagic sealing is different. The pelagic seal hunter cannot distinguish between male and female seals or seals of different ages in the water; he would make no distinction if he could. Every and any fur-seal he sees is proper spoil for him; none is allowed to escape, whatever the sex or age. And experience and the records show that vastly the greater part of the pelagic catch each year consists of females. Every female seal killed in the open sea means not only her death and that of her unborn pup but also that of the pup which she leaves on the rookery when she goes out inthe sea to feed. Every time afemale seal is killed in the open sea a fur-seal pup is left to starve. Since pelagic sealing began some thirty years ago hundreds of thou- sands of pups have starved miserably on St. Paul and St. George. The possibility of saving these motherless pups from starvation has often been considered, and several attempts have been made to induce them to take artificial food. All such attempts failed utterly. Every pup experimented with refused absolutely to take any kind of food, although various and ingenious devises were employed to induce or force them to do so. Similar attempts with older or adult seals also failed. They chafed under restraint or confinement, refused any and all kinds of food, and finally died of starvation. Apocryphal tales may be heard on the Pribilof Islands of fur-seals having been tamed and living thereafter in the houses of the natives of the islands. In the early seventies the Alaska Commercial Com- pany brought down from the islands two immature live fur-seals, their exact age not definitely known, and placed them in Woodward’s Gardens at San Francisco, but they died of starvation after several months’ incarceration, having eaten nothing during the interval. This experiment at Woodward’s Gardens, and all other similar attempts, fixed the belief that fur-seals in captivity could not be induced to take food. Recently, however, the experiment was again tried and with com- plete success. The effort had its inception in the desire of Dr. Fox, surgeon of the revenue cutter Bear, to ascertain whether the fur- seals are infected with ectoparasites. For this purpose a starving pup, whose mother had been killed by the pelagic pirates while feeding at sea, was given to the Bear’s surgeon. After having been examined by Dr. Fox the half-starved little animal was turned over to Mr. Judson Thurber, the Bear’s boatswain, who desired to attempt feeding the pup by artificial means. He was so far successful that he induced 134. AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE it to eat dried fish from his hand, and kept it for three weeks, when it died in convulsions. Desiring to have the experiment carried further, two well-conditioned fur-seal pups, a male and a female, were obtained on Gorbatch rookery, St. Paul Island, and furnished to Boatswain Thurber on October 9, 1909. Mr. Thurber began his experiments by forcing condensed milk down the throat. On October 19 the female began eating solid food. Each of the pups experienced some difficulty in swallowing solid food, due, the boatswain thought, to the fact that the tongue was tied down too firmly by the membrane or frenum which binds it to the floor of the mouth. He was led to this opinion by observing that the female pup ate more easily after breaking the mem- brane loose. He then tore loose the frenum of the male’s tongue, with the result that he, too, began to take food more freely. In conducting the experiment Mr. Thurber showed no little skill and infinite patience. At first he would hold their mouths open, pour into them diluted evaporated cream mixed with small bits of fish, and then, holding the seal up by the head, shake the food down. In this way some of the food reached their stomachs and the seals got the taste of food. Then he would tie a small piece of fresh fish on the end of a string and tease the seal by dangling it in front of its nose until the seal snapped at it, when it would be poked down the throat and the string cut. By the first week in November both seals were eating greedily. When the Bear arrived at San Diego late in the fall, and the command- ing officer, Capt. E. P. Bertholf, reported to Washington that the Bear had two fur-seal pups on board and in good condition, steps were at once taken by the Hon. George M. Bowers, Commissioner of Fish- eries, to have them brought to Washington. All necessary details were soon arranged and Boatswain Thurber arrived in Washington January 11, 1910, with his precious pets. They were hurried from the express car to the Bureau of Fisheries, where they were received with ereat interest; for no one at Washington except the few fortunate ones who had visited the Pribilof Islands had ever seen a live fur-seal. They were at once placed in the large pool at the bureau after being photographed, measured and weighed. This pool contained fresh water, and the effect upon the seals was awaited with interest. If they showed any distress it was arranged to supply them with salt water. But the fresh water did not appear to worry them in the least, and they have been kept in it continuously to the present time. . Although somewhat restless at first they soon quieted down and appeared perfectly at home. They are fed regularly twice a day on EVERMANN: FurR-SEAL EXPERIMENT 135 fresh fish, which they take eagerly, each eating from 5 to 8 pounds daily. When they were first weighed (January 20, 1910), the male weighed 28 pounds and the female 195. Since then they have been weighed regularly on the twentieth of each month. On October 20 they weighed 463 and 343 pounds, respectively. This is a gain of 66 per cent for the male and 77 per cent for the female in nine months. Whether this is a normal growth no one really knows, for never before were any accurate observations made to determine just how much a fur-seal six months or fifteen months old ought to weigh. But those who are familiar with seal life on the Pribilof Islands say that these two pups appear fully as large and fine in every way as those of the same age on the rookeries. Not only have these two pups been kept in fresh water, but the water in the summer was much warmer than any Alaska fur-seal was ever before called on toendure. In July the temperature of the water ran as high as 88° F., and the average for that month was 80°. But this high temperature apparently produced no evil results; indeed, the seals during July were not only as playful and active as usual, but they actually ate more during that month than in any other. They have proved the most interesting pets that have ever been kept in the aquarium at the Bureau of Fisheries. They are the most expert swimmers imaginable. Their favorite pastime is to swim rapidly around the large pool in which they are kept, sometimes as rapidly as the most rapidly flying bird, often jumping like porpoises and splashing water on unsuspecting visitors. They circle about the pool, always turning to the right with the handsof theclock. Immedi- ately after feeding they begin scratching and rubbing themselves, a sort of massage which doubtless aids digestion. These fur-seal pups have now been kept in captivity more than a year. They have been kept in fresh water more than nine months. They are now sixteen months old and appear to be in excellent con- dition. The experiment has so far proved eminently satisfactory. It has demonstrated a number of very important facts. In the first place it has shown that fur-seal pups can be taught to take food when offered them by man. It also shows that they can be kept in captivity and carried long distances on vessels or railroad trains without any special difficulty, that they will live and thrive in fresh water, that a salt-water environment is not essential, and that they can live without any apparent discomfort in water of a much higher temperature than that of their natural habitat. 136 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE The success of this experiment also suggests a number of interesting possibilities. May it not be possible to save the hundreds or thou- sands of pups whose mothers are killed by the pelagic sea pirates every year? ‘To do this it would be necessary to feed the pups only until the herd leaves the islands late in the fall. After they have once been taught to take solid food it would seem that they might be per- mitted to leave the islands with the rest of the pups and that their chances of survival in the sea would be quite as good as any. The supplying of fur-seals to public aquariums and zodlogical parks is another possibility which seems entirely practicable. The possibility of establishing a colony of fur-seals in some fresh-water lake is also suggested. The essential features would seem to be a lake with an adequate supply of fish, which does not freeze over entirely in winter, and in which the seals would be fully protected. But most interesting and important of all is the possibility of estab- lishing colonies of fur-seals on our North Atlantic Coast. If the Canadian government could establish a fur-seal colony or rookery somewhere on her east coast, the pelagic sealing question would speedily be solved; for it would seem that Great Britain would at once join the United States and the other maritime nations in an international game law or agreement by which the high seas beyond the three-mile zone would become a place of refuge for all marine mammals such as fur-seals, sea-lions, walruses and whales. This would not only stop pelagic sealing, but it would be the most effective step ever taken for the preservation of these rapidly disappearing animals. It is true that the difficulties in the way of establishing the fur-seal in the Atlantic are very great, but I think they can be met. Notre—Since this article was written the experiment has been sarried still further. The two seals are still alive and apparently in excellent condition at the present date,—September 9, 1911. On August 20, 1911, they weighed 63 and 41.5 pounds respectively. [Presented by Committee on Fur Bearing Animals.] EDITORIALS SIZE OF FARMS AND FARM FAMILIES The New York Agricultural College at Cornell has recently issued a bulletin based on an agricultural survey of four townships in the New York county of Tomkins, in which the college is located. This report, by Prof. G. F. Warren and others, shows that in order to assure a reasonable family income the family farm should be rather large. The deductions from the statistics collected seem to indicate that the best size is somewhere between 160 acres and 200 acres for Tomkins County, where the average value of the land is low. Merely from the standpoint of economic production as the result of a sufficient division of labor, profitable employment of labor, and the utilization of labor-saving machinery, a farm large enough to employ two or three workers was found to be the most profitable. On farms up to about 100 acres in area the cost of production per acre and per worker is relatively too great. The crop yields on these smaller farms are not sufficiently greater to overcome a larger cost per acre of man labor, horse labor, machinery, and incidental expenses. A farm owner, to make an income beyond his own labor wage, must have acreage enough to use two, three and four-horse teams, and the machinery adapted to those teams, rather than only one or two horses. The larger farm makes it possible for the farmer to use the labor of his sons, or of one or more hired men, so as to make some profit beyond the market value of their labor. The fact that a relatively small part of the farmers can make good incomes by intensively cultivating a small fruit or vegetable farm has led many people to believe that our family farms are generally too large to serve best the interests either of the farmers or of those who purchase the farmers’ products. It must be remembered that the bulk of the American farm products is composed of grains and live stock, and that these are and must be produced in a broad way under conditions of general farming. On the other hand, the assumption that the results obtained in the course of this agricultural survey indicate that our farming must eventually go the way of the businesses of transportation, of manufacture, and even of merchandising, and be organized under large companies, is not justified. In farming, where the home and the business are a unit, there is another most important interest at 137 138 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE stake, aside from profits per acre and per worker, or the abundance and cheapness of products supplied to consumers in our cities. The larger farm product is the farm people. The plan of one farm and three hired men is good for the farmer and his family, but not good for the average of the four families; and if we extend this cen- tralization so as to have one farmer and nineteen hired men, the farm profits are centered in a still smaller number of farmers. ‘Thus a larger school district, such as a consolidated rural school district of 20, 30, or 40 square miles, might have ten farm homes and 190 homes of hired men. Two hundred families thus situated would not make so strong a community as under the present plan of 100 farmers on family farms assisted by their fifty sons and fifty hired men, making two men to the farm. It should be remembered that most of the hired men under family farm conditions are farmers’ sons working their way up to become landowners. This plan gives two men per farm. It avoids on the one hand the too small farm plan which France brought about by enforced legal division of farm estates, and on the other hand the too large estate which in England is made possible by the law permitting primogeni- ture and the entailment of estates, and keeping the entire large estate intact for the eldest son. The larger public policy will be best served when the eugenics side of country life is fully appreciated. If the two-man farm plan will produce the greatest number of good citizens, will conduce to the production of the strongest country people, and will result in the larg- est measure of happiness to the sum of the people in the open country, means should be discovered not merely to preserve but to highly develop country life under that plan. This bulletin from Cornell, however, adds to the conviction that farming must follow all other lines of business and be organized. There must be either radical centralization of the ownership of land or the less radical but fully as effective individual ownership with fullest codperation to attend to the general business of the farm. The interests of the race strongly favor the latter plan, provided there be really effective codperative organization. Fortunately plans are being formulated in thousands of communities which promise solu- tions, and which may lead to a remarkable development of our already unparalleled country life. Colleges of agriculture; agricultural technological high schools; local schools made over in the interests of country life, departmental and college extension departments, and publishers of literature relat- EDITORIALS 139 ing to farming and farm home making are developing adequate means to take to all farm people the rapidly accumulating stores of knowledge relating to the farm and the farm home and are working out a won- derfully productive scientific technique of farming and country living. What promises to be the most important single element in all of this development is the consolidated rural school, serving a large community or district. Six or eight one-room rural school districts, covering a scope of 20 to 36 square miles, are consolidated into one school large enough to have institutional organization. Fifteen of these schools in the average county bring vocational as well as general education within driving distance of all farm youth. This institution unifies the education for country life and it also recenters nearly all other country life interests. It promises to lead a technologically educated people into general economic, social and educational co- Operation. In this community attention will come to be paid to the values of good heredity, and the community will doubtless come to look upon each farm home as an institution in which the public, the State, and the race is interested as the source of strong people. The two-man farm of 160 acres is in danger, and with it America’s plan of producing the most just and beautiful country life in the world. The danger is that publicists, educators, and even the farmers themselves look primarily at the business side of farming. Our investigators into farm management need to look very specifically at the economic side of farm organization, but they need also as clearly to investigate the social, racial and eugenic inter- ests of life in the open country. THE FIELD OF EUGENICS Man will one day know himself better and will use more care to cultivate assiduously the consciousness that he is a higher being with most wonderful possibilities. Eugenics will ere long drive home to the human race the fact that its worst blood should be reproduced but slowly, if at all, and that it is a sacred duty of the best blood to mul- tiply itself and people the earth. In a newly colonized country, its forming race is hybridized in the most complex manner; but no matter how complicated, it is possible to establish the racial breeding values of each strain and family; and the probable value of each individual as a progenitor of generations of children can be at least roughly determined. 140 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE Society and even the church can then place a social pressure upon, and deter from reproduction, those likely to produce weak, diseased, or criminal offspring, and the state can even restrict child bearing on the part of those most deficient. Thus the major part of the weak fibers can be eliminated from the network of human descent. But even more important is the faet that efficient blood can be encouraged by many agencies at the command of society to produce such numbers of children as they can well support and train. High public regard of unusually efficient families, probably more than any- thing else, will be instrumental in stimulating pride of family among individuals, and in encouraging them to perpetuate their superior qualities in larger families of children. Society is now rather assisting families of weaker heredity to multi- ply, through various forms of otherwise most beneficent charities. How to lessen the effects of thus breeding the race downward, and how to favor the production of progeny whose blood improves the network of descent of the race, are still difficult problems. That the human race will highly develop its plants, its domestic animals, and its household pets, and permanently neglect itself does not seem plausible. The methods at the command of eugenics are narrower than those employed in plant or animal breeding. In case of the apple we can produce ten thousand seedling trees, test each tree as to quantity and quality of fruit, and discard all but the one best, and then by grafting, budding, or other processes we can soon so multiply the one plant that it will fill all the orchards of the region to which it is adapted. In breeding cattle, swine, or poultry, individuals which are inferior or are susceptible to disease can be discarded. In cereals, live stock, or fruit, two or more strains, each possessing desirable characters, can be hybridized, thus engrafting upon the new stock the good qualities of both parents. And even in hybrid plants the selection of progeny can be so restrictive that only that one in hundreds or in thousands, or in tens of thousands, which comes nearest the desired type, need be selected. In the human family there can be no such sweeping discarding of the unfit. But the superlative importance to the species of multi- plying the good blood and thus building up better race stocks makes even a narrow range of possible improvements a matter of vital con- cern. Family genealogies are needed which, not as the present com- paratively worthless ones, merely record names and relationships, but which make a note of certain characteristics of each individual. EDITORIALS 141 When racial, family, and individual values shall have become matters of pedigree record, and eugenics shall have passed the stage of igno- rance and prudishness, the race will more rapidly slough off its weak branches, while the more virile and useful stocks will build up the tree of life. From generation to generation, eugenics, improved phy- sical environment, education, religion, and the inherent impulse in the human soul to aspire after better things will relegate to inactivity the weaker and baser characters. The improvement through heredity may at first be painfully slow. The improvement from education and from an ever-growing altru- ism will for some time be more rapid. But the race will experience its greatest improvement and attain its greatest ultimate physical and intellectual development through eugenics, because heredity is basal, and every point gained in heredity serves as a better basis upon which to build all other improving processes. WORLD'S FOOD REQUIREMENTS MET BY BREEDING BETTER TYPES No one who studies world economics can doubt that a permanent world competition for food at high prices has begun. Increase in the world’s population and increase in the purchasing power per capita of all thrifty peoples will not only sustain prices for farm prod- ucts, put will require rapid and large increases in the total product. In two or three generations we shall need to feed 180,000,000 people in the United States where we now feed 90,000,000. Since the pres- ent population consumes $7,500,000,000 worth of farm products annually, the requirements then will be for products worth $15,000,- 000,000. Assume that the 10,000,000 farmers in the entire country sixty vears hence will annually apply fertilizers worth one dollar per acre to 500,000,000 acres, at a cost of $500,000,000, and that the result would be $1,000,000,000 worth of added farm products, then the profit in this case would be $500,000,000, or 100 per cent. Assume also that the federal and state governments, through their departments of agriculture and experiment stations, and the farmers and breeders of the country shall have expended in creative plant and animal breeding two dollars per farm, or $20,000,000. If this should increase the product one dollar per acre on one hundred acres on each of 10,000,000 farms, it would amount to $1,000,000,000, with a new profit of $980,000,000, or 4,900 per cent. 142 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE Further, we may roughly estimate that we shall during that time so add to our cultivated area as to increase our annual product by $2,- 000,000,000. It is fair to estimate also that by better crop rotation schemes, better tillage methods, and better methods of managing our live stock we can add yet another $2,000,000,000. The total addi- tion thus provided would be $6,000,000,000—still one and a half bilions worth of product short of the additional $7,500,000,000 needed. It is entirely possible that the farmer and breeder under scientific direction, by spending somewhat more than $20,000,000 for creative breeding might produce the other one and one half billions worth of product needed. It is, indeed, probable that 25 per cent, instead of only 10 per cent, might be added to the yield of farm products by breeding and applying this to the increased acreage under the im- proved conditions assumed. Thus, approximately $2,500,000,000 of additional products annually would bepossible through improve- ments in heredity. In other words, it does not seem improbable that when our product is worth $15,000,000,000 fully $2,500,000,000 worth of the added product may be due to plant and animal forms producing an average of 25 per cent more than those now in use. Because of the relatively small outlay it requires, breeding is especially effective not only in increasing the quantity of agricultural products but also in reducing the cost of production. Let us give the heredity of the mutating plant and animal an important place as one of the world’s great forces beside the fertility of the soil and beside the power which we util- ize from water, coal, wood, oil and wind. PRESERVE THE RED MAN’S HEREDITY A movement has been inaugurated under the auspices of American Indians of pure and mixed breeding to foster and preserve the rem- nants of the Indian race. This effort has much in it which is to be highly commended. It will engender racial pride, will foster indivi- dual ambition, and will lead to tribal and family emulation. Eugen- ists will see in this movement a plan for preserving certain charac- teristics of this race, that they may not be lost from our sources of good blood. This new organization can help to preserve a race of purebred Indians, as the Arabian Horse Association in America is collecting and preserving pure blood of that class of horses. And as the Arab horses have served most effectively as the whole or partial EDITORIALS 143 basis of some of our most useful families and breeds of horses, such as the saddle horse and the Morgan horse, so the blood of the Indian may perhaps be used as part of the basis of virile families of men. No one need feel offended at this illustration from the domain of live stock. In fact, no small part of the plans which will be used in eugenic records designed either to preserve the heredity of races of men or to aid in their genetic improvement is being wrought out in the record systems of plant and animal breeding. And we have further illustrations in the animal world of the need of preserving the aboriginal races and species. A most notable example is the American bison or buffalo. A few men have saved it from extinction, and there is much promise that breeds of cattalo, made by hybridizing the buffalo and cattle, may have a large field of usefulness. At present small herds of these hybrid cattaloes indicate that breeds combining beef and fur production may be developed for regions requiring great endurance of cold winters, as in our northern mountain regions and in Alaska. The demonstration seems complete that robes finer, more uniform throughout, and more valuable than the buffalo robes of pioneer times can be produced by the scientific creation of breeds of hybrid cattaloes. In some of the tribes of the American Indians are characteristics which may have uses in the future American type. The pigment in the skin may enable the crossbred between the pale face and the red man to thrive better in the hot regions of our own country or in the tropics. His endurance gained in the chase may help in making up the future race of men suited to many of the strenuous tasks which future civilization will, more even than now, impose upon both men and women. A strain of his stoicism and ability to live far away from his fellows may peculiarly fit him for the work of the forest guard in our great public forest reservations. As a pure race, or perchance in mixture with our mountaineer whites, he may become our future mountain inhabitant, adapted at once to the rugged life of the isolated mountain home and to the ser- vice of forest workers in our great areas of forests under scientific public or private management. He may be peculiarly adapted to life on the great semiarid plains, where science has begun to guide the production of breeds of live stock for the production of meat, wool, and horses under conditions existing in the great short-grass country. But why restrict him? Either in his purity of blood or in mixed races the American Indian may take up very many functions of life. The Indian needs only to see his racial problem, to study his genetic 144 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE destiny in the light of modern science, to find the niches, large or small, into which he may fit, and then redirect his energies to meet the new problems before him. In numerous regions the amalgamation of the Indian and white races has so far developed that much of the psychological repugnance to the mixture of racial blood has been broken down. A study of the vigor, ability, and general character of these people of mixed blood of the third and later generation hybrids should be made by trained eugenists. Those characters which act definitely as Mendelian units should be known; also, those recombinations of unit characters which make for weakness, and those which give strength and both individual and genetic efficiency. Those persons who have begun the organization to preserve and build up the remnant of our ancient Indian blood may have in mind only education, political rights, and other environ- mental conditions. But the eugenic side of the movement is worthy of equal consideration. A system of number names for which the Indian office could supply very much material would place this race in a position of advantage as compared with other races. By recording the individual value both in a single numerical statement and in unit character detail there would soon be records from which the genetic value of individuals and families may be deduced. Many of the methods of tabulating, averaging, and otherwise determining the genetic values of the respec- tive individuals and families have already been practically wrought out in the science of breeding plants and animals. Even a larger vision for the Indians to realize is that ere long all races shall have been brought under the scrutiny of genetic science. Then the Indian character as a whole and each racial unit character will be in competition under methods more or less aided by statistical records of performance with the characters of other races. It is a good guess that the Indian blood will not be near the foot of racial values and that families both of purebred Indians and of those mixed with white and other blood will find permanent places under a system of genetic records which will discredit all the weakest families if not the weakest races. NEWS AND NOTES REPORT ON CONFERENCE OF RESEARCH COMMITTEES OF THE EUGENICS SECTION On May 2 and 8 a conference of the research committees of the Eugenics Section of the American Breeders Association was held at the Monson State Hospital, Palmer, Mass., under the presidency of Dr. W. N. Bullard, chairman of the Committee on Inheritance in Epilepsy. About twenty persons were in attendance, including the following members of the committees of the Eugenics Section: H. H. Goddard, E. E. Southard, F. A. Woods, Everett Flood, W. M. Car- malt. After introductory remarks by the presiding officer, brief statements were made by Dr. Carmalt, of New Haven, who stated that the law in Connecticut relating to sterilization had not yet been put in practice in a single case in that State. Dr. Ross, who has just been appointed superintendent of a new institution for epileptics in Mansfield, Conn., spoke briefly of the plansof thatinstitution. Mr. H. H. Laughlin, superintendent of the Eugenics Record Office, moved the appointment of a committee to study the result of the experiment in sterilization made by various States. The chairman named as members of this committee Dr. Mitchell, superintendent of the Danver State Hospital, chairman, Mr. Laughlin, secretary, and Messrs. W. M. Carmalt, Bleecker Van Wagenen, and Everett Flood. Dr. Rosanoff, of Kings Park State Hospital, representing Miss Orr and himself, read a paper on ‘Further Studies on Inheritance in Insanity,” confirming and extending the results of the paper by Miss Cannon and Dr. Rosanoff, recently published in the Journal of Ner- vous and Mental Diseases, showing that idiopathic forms follow \len- del’s law. Dr. Flood summarized the recent report of the commission appoint- ed by the governor of Massachusetts to investigate the question of the increase of criminals, mental defectives and degenerates. The report had to be drawn up in a short time and the commission had small funds for its assistance. They reached a general conclusion that there is nd evidence of an increase in the number of these defec- tive classes in Massachusetts. They make a series of recommenda- tions. Dr.E. E. Southard read thereport of the Committee on Hered- ity in Insanity, of which Dr. Adolf Meyer is chairman. Dr. C. B. Davenport presented a paper on the relation between geographical isolation and consanguineous marriage, calling attention to the fact 145 146 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE that many islands off the New England coast showed much inter- marriage of relatives and an unusually large proportion of cases of recessive characteristics in the population. Similarly, the valleys in mountainous or hilly countries and other communities isolated by their distance from railways and means of communication from the outer world are regions of consanguineous marriage. Dr. A. H. Estabrook, field worker of the Eugenics Record Office, gave an account of the degeneracy in a valley in eastern New York State. Here over two-thirds of the population of over 600 persons are mentally defective. There is a large proportion of consanguineous marriages. Dr. David F. Weeks, superintendent of New Jersey State Institution for Epilep- tics, reported on the methods that are being used to standardize methods of charting human pedigrees. These are set forth in Bulletin No. 2 of the Eugenics Record Office. This was discussed by Dr. H. H. Goddard, Mr. E. R. Johnstone, superintendent of the Vineland Training School, and others. Mr. H. H. Laughlin, superintendent of the Eugenics Record Office, gave a report on its work that is pub- lished elsewhere in this Magazine. Dr. C. G. McGaffin, pathologist, Taunton State Hospital, Taunton, Mass., presented three pedigree charts: (a) The C. family: Four generations had been traced with a fair degree of accuracy and the living members of three generations had been interviewed. The first generation showed two cases of maniac- depressive insanity; the second, five cases of maniac-depressive, one of paranoia, and one of imbecility; the third, no active mental symp- toms, but there was a prostitute, a vagrant, and one with a criminal record among its members; the fourth consists of children who up to the present have shown no mental symptoms, although two are considered weak-minded. (b) The W. family: This family shows cases of Huntingdon’s chorea in five generations, also some insane members. (c) The H. family: A chart showing over 1,000 individuals with insanity in six generations. This chart was worked out entirely from the genealogical record of this family, a volume unique in its careful tabulation of biologie record. Miss Florence Danielson, a field worker of the Eugenics Record Office assigned to the Monson State Hospital, gave an account of one of the families that she has studied most extensively, showing a high incidence of feeble-mindedness, alcoholism, and sex immorality in certain rural communities of southwestern and western Massachusetts. Dr. F. A. Woods read a paper on separating heredity from environ- NEWS AND NOTES 147 ment, published in a later Magazine. Mr. L. B. Alford, research officer and pathologist of the Monson State Hospital, spoke on inher- itance in epilepsy after the Brown-Sequard method and demonstrated with guinea pigs.—C. B. Davenrort, Secretary. THE HEURTIN FAMILY OF VERTOU As an example of a defective germ plasm perpetuating itself per- sistently and with disastrous results the Heurtin family of Vertou, Copyright, 1910, by Volta bureau. THREE OF THE HEURTIN FAMILY. Stanislas congenitally deaf and nearly blind. Marie and Martha congenitally blind-deaf 148 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE France, furnishes instructive material for the eugenist. A Breton tun maker, Stanislas Aristide Heurtin, in 1884 contracted marriage with his second cousin four years his junior. He is a sufferer from a spinal (marrow) disease and also from hemeralopia which is described as an abnormal condition of the eyes in which the sense of vision is impaired by artificial light (the reverse may also be the case, when it is day-blindness). Nine children resulted from this marriage, as follows: Marie, born April 18, 1885; born blind-deaf. Lucien, born February 8, 1887; died at the age of 21 days. Eugenie, born December 11, 1887; born blind; died August 5, 1899. Elisa, born December 24, 1891; in possession of all senses, normal. Adelaide, born July 29, 1894; in possession of all senses, normal. Stanislas, born December 21, 1896; born deaf and ‘‘hemeralope.”’ Germaine, born January 3, 1899; died March 12, 1902. Marthe, born July 23, 1902; born blind-deaf. Germaine Andre, born November 22, 1906; born blind-deaf and paralyzed in the limbs; died January 20, 1908. Aor WN FH OON Thus, summarizing, of nine children only two were normal and capable of enjoying all faculties, three were born blind-deaf, one deaf and ‘“‘hemeralope,” one blind, and four died young. The close blood relationship of the parents may perhaps have been a partial cause of the infirmity of their progeny, but the greater proba- bility is that the father’s infirmities were responsible. The heredity of the family is shown strikingly in the chart below. S-H @ | B.D B D.H B.D BDP HEREDITY OF THE HEURTIN FAMILY. U_ Defect if any, not ascertainable. B_ Blind. S Spinal disease. D Deaf. H Hemeralopia. P Paralyzed (in limbs). The amount of physical defectiveness carried in the blood of this family is appalling. But there is no doubt of the correctness of the data, which are vouched for by M. A. Constantin, director of the Insti- tution de la Persagotiére at Nantes, France, who has favored the Volta Bureau, Washington, with the statement. Mr. F. K. Noyes, editor of the Volta Review, kindly loaned the copyrighted photograph shown above. NeEws AND NOTES 149 IMPORTANCE OF RAISING THE SECOND GENERATION OF CROSSES This Magazine is read by some who can not find time to keep abreast of the theoretical side of the experimental work in breeding which has developed so rapidly of late. It may therefore be of use to notice the importance of getting the second generation from a cross. The breeder should not reject the results of a cross when the individuals of the first generation do not show anything which he thinks worth preserving. As Bateson states in his excellent account of breeding work (Mendel’s Prirciples of Heredity, 1909), some amount of money has been lost through this procedure. It is difficult for most people to refrain from judging an animal or plant merely by its exte- rior. But the breeder at least must judge by performance and not by looks. He who rejects a crossbred plant or animal because its outward appearance does not satisfy him is throwing away a purse beeause it looks shabby, without opening it to see what money it may contain. A good example of this has come under my notice. The velvet bean, which is an important forage crop in Florida, and bears short velvety pods, was crossed with a new and promising bean from the Philippines, the Lyon bean, which has long pods covered with down. All the plants grown from the crossed seed bore long pods clothed with fine hairs which got loose and penetrated the skin so as to cause irritation. In the words of the gardener, they “were covered with hot fuzz that nearly drove one crazy.’ If this cross had been raised during the last century, it is probable that all the stinging plants would have been burnt. But the knowledge already gained by exper- iment led to the saving and hulling of these pods. Their seeds grew into vines that bore pods, on some plants all stinging, on others all downy, on others all velvety, and on others nearly smooth. Differ- ences as to early or late ripening, amounts of healthy pods, propor- tions of scattered seeds, long or short pods, sizes of seeds, colors of seeds, sizes of bunches, numbers of seeds in pods, etc., are visible, and enable selections of forage plants to be made from the progeny of those seemingly useless stinging plants of the first generation.— JoHN BELLING, Gainesville, Fla. 150 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE PROGRESS REPORT FROM GENETICS CONFERENCE TO BE HELD IN PARIS The organisation committee of the fourth International Conference of Genetics assembled on June 14 under the presidency of Dr. Viger. Mons. Philippe de Vilmorin, secretary of the committee, told the assembled members what had been done to prepare for the conference. He had received 130 adherents of which three are honorary members. The sum received in subscriptions up to that date amounted to 2300 francs. The rest was expected to be received in the course of July. Not counting the names of the principal French biologists who are members of the committee, the following foreigners have subscribed: Baur, Giesenhagen, Goldschmidt Pfitzer, Poll, ete. (Germany); Agar, Bateson, Darbishire, Gregory, Miss Durham, Hartog, Laxton, Lynch, Nettleship, Paton, Punnett, Miss Saunders, Staples-Browne, Sutton, Miss Wheldale, etc. (England); Bradley (Australia); Fru- wirth, Strakosch, Tschermak, ete. (Austria); W. and C. Saunders, (Canada); Johannsen (Denmark); Balls (Egypt); Davenport, Hays, Howard, Swingle, Tower, etc. (United States) ; Hagedoorn, Houwink, Lotsy, Norduijn (Holland); Leake (India); Strampeli (Italy); Nilssonehle (Sweden); Chodat (Switzerland); Boris de Fedtschenko (Russia); Arechavaleta (Uruguay), ete. A NEW ZEALAND ESTIMATE OF THE AMERICAN BREEDERS ASSOCIATION The January, 1911, number of the Journal of the Department of Agriculture of New Zealand contains an article—one of a series on plant breeding—by Prof. A. H. Cockayne (A.B.A.), in which he makes mention of the work of the American Breeders Association in the fol- lowing language: One of the most powerful organizations devoted to the furtherance of breed- ing is that of the American Breeders Association, an institution which is doing an immense amount of good in securing uniformity of work, formulating methods for special investigation, and, in general, advancing the science of breeding into one of the most essential and valuable of all the sciences con- nected with agriculture. It is‘split up into a large number of com mittees, con- sisting of the ablest investigators in America. The plant-breeding phase of the work is being given full prominence, as it is recognized that plant improve- ment is one of the primal factors governing the agriculture of the present day. Its membership is already over eight hundred strong, and is constantly increas- ing. During the past, great prominence has been given in all countries to animal breeding, and the results achieved have led to the establishment of many organizations dealing with the subject: but the American Breeders Asso- ciation recognizes that plant breeding should go hand-in-hand with animal NeEws AND NOTES 158 breeding, and the influence of this association is likely to give a great impetus to this work in America, where even now plant-breeding is assuming important proportions. Every experiment station—and there are one or more in every State—devotes a portion of its funds to plant improvement, and much of the money of the ‘“‘ Adams Act”’ is to be used in this connection. The crying need of the present-day farmer is to increase the returns from the area he cultivates, and to enable him to do this the aid of the plant breeder must be invoked. The American Breeders Association; in bringing before public notice the urgent necessity of more breeding work, especially with plants, conducted in a truly scientific manner, and pursued with a definite aim, will be conducive of much good. NOTE FROM NORWAY Dr. H. H. Gran, professor of the botanical laboratory of the Uni- versity of Christiania, Norway,and member of the American Breeders - Association writes that the Norway Horticultural Society, of which, by the way, he is president, has systematically begun work in plant breeding. ACKNOWLEDGMENT The editor of the Magazine is indebted for permission to reproduce the likeness of Benjamin Tomkins, Jr., to Mr. T. F. B. Sotham. The plate is from Mr. William Sotham’s work on “The History of Hereford Cattle.”’ PUBLICATIONS RECEIVED SPINELESS Cactus. Luther Burbank, Santa Rosa, Cal. 32 pp. Illustrated. A history and description of varieties of Opuntia (spineless cactus). EINFUEHRUNG IN DIE EXPERIMENTELLE VERERBUNGSLEHRE. Prof. Dr. Erwin Baur. 1911. 293 pp., 80 text figures, 9 colored plates. Publishers, Gebrueder Borntraeger, Berlin. Die DerutscHeE LANDWIRTSCHAFTLICHE PFLANZENZUCHT. Dr. P. Hillmann, manager of the seed-growing division of the German Agricultural Associa- tion. Prepared under authority of the organization. 1910. 663 pp.; 546 illustrations and 1 colored plate. Publishers, Deutsche Landwirtschafts Gesellschaft, Berlin. ConFIpDENcES. Talks with a young girl concerning herself. By Edith B. Lowry, M.D. Forbes and Company, Chicago. 1911. 94 pp. Trutus. Talks with a boy concerning himself. Same author and publisher. 1911. 95 pp. These are two companion books, and what is said below applies to both. They are designed to be placed, and in the reviewer’s opinion ought to be placed, in the hands of every boy and girl of from ten to 152 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE fourteen years of age. And as a matter of fact thousands of adults might profitably read these books. “‘Confidences” and ‘Truths’ tell in simple conversational style of the mystery of reproduction and of the care of the body. The lan- guage is chaste, direct, and personal, and it is all said so charmingly, delicately, and winningly that the author is sure to gain the confidence of her young reader. The penalties which nature inflicts upon those who disobey either knowingly or ignorantly are referred to inciden- tally and as a warning, and not in a way likely to frighten. Dr. Lowry has rendered parents and all in charge of young lives a real service. It is doubtful if wise instruction such as contained in these books can be imparted as well by any grown person not having special training. Many parents find themselves tongue-tied in con- versations on this subject with their children. But that parents should place upon strangers, playmates, or servants the terrible responsibility of imparting this knowledge to their children is crim- inal. We have come to realize that silence and evasion are stupid and criminal and have been the cause of untold harm. There is springing up a healthy sentiment in favor of meeting parental respon- sibility with becoming sense and intelligence, and of giving timely and sensible instruction to youths concerning sex life and the elemental biological processes. Dr. Lowry has hit upon a most happy way of telling her story. ‘‘Confidences,’”’ written for girls, is if anything written in brighter vein than the other book. These booklets should be the counsellor of every boy and girl. Tue Sociat DirecTION oF HuMAN EVOLUTION, AN OUTLINE OF THE SCIENCE oF Huaenics. William E. Kellicott, Professor of Biology, Goucher College. 249 pp., 29 illustrations. D. Appleton and Company. 1911. Incorporating the essence of lectures delivered before the students of Oberlin College, this book is written in plain, easily understood English, and is a welcome addition to the number of works treating on eugenics in popular language. Presentation of the subject in this manner from authoritative sources will be the urgent need of the eugen- ics propaganda for many years to come. Decades will probably have to pass before the racial conscience will be awakened to the realization of the enormities of the crimes committed under the cloak of custom, tradition and prudery, against the integrity of the race. Books almost without number, written in all languages, for all classes of people, will be needed to perform this tmportant educational function. The book is optimistic, though not for a moment losing sight of the difficulties and obstacles in the way of eugenic reforms. News AND NOTES 153 The outline does not pretend to present the results of research work or of original investigations on eugenics by the author. On the contrary, he draws upon the work of those who have done fundamen- tal research in this new science and shows the bearing of their dis- coveries on economic and social conditions. In intention the book is suggestive, giving in large, boldly-drawn but necessarily fragmentary outlines a view of the entire field of human heredity. The best written and perhaps the most interesting part of the book is the second half, in which is proposed and discussed a eugenics program. Some criticism may be offered upon the author’s lack of uniformity in the use of symbols to illustrate heredity charts. The appearance and readability of the book would have been considerably improved by using the symbols employed by the Eugenics Section of the Ameri- can Breeders Association. The uniform and general use by writers and publicists of these symbols would soon lead to recognition and knowledge of their meaning among the general public and even on the part of the casual reader. The sooner this can be accomplished the better are the prospects of eugenic teachings sinking into the pub- lic mind. THE Law oF SEx DETERMINATION AND ITS PRACTICAL APPLICATION. Laura A. Calhoun. 254 pp., 2 illustrations. The Eugenics Publishing Company, New York City. 1910. This sizable work is another contribution to the very numerous theories of sex determination or production of sex at will. It is apparent that the author makes a serious attempt to treat the sub- ject from a scientific point of view. But the major premise of the dissertation is not based upon conclusions obtained by scientific methods. It lacks experimental evidence and the support of statis- tical data. In fact, the author seems to realize this, to judge from the admissions, direct or implied, that she has not given the theory the necessary experimental corroboration or tests. To cite an instance; after explaining her view of the effect under her law of sex determina- tion, in case of partial castration of domestic animals, she suggests: “This could be tested by a breeder of animals, and if proved to be the case would be of great value.” Part of the book is devoted to a review of the status of the study of the heredity of sex, origin of sex, relation of the cell to sex, and the- ories of sex determination which have from time to time been put forward. The author is aware of the fact that the number of these 154 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE theories runs pretty well mto the hundreds. There are other hundreds of “theories” and “recipes,” notable chiefly for their gro- tesqueness, which are practiced by farmers and breeders for con- trolling sex of offspring of domestic animals. The book is reflective but hardly conclusive. It seems that the author would need a very much larger number of cases to prove the correctness of her theory, and to submit a physiological and cytologi- cal rationale of the processes involved. A new and heretofore apparently unobserved phenomenon is described and termed “‘telegyny.” ..000..0.-..0. 0.2... 238 POL) JSG ee (0 ee eats ASSOCIATION MATTERS: Yearbook of Proceedings of the A. B. A. for Sale................ Bas FeZS9 2220. D1 URVES ep RIOT 7 ee ne ee 239 Report of the Secretary of the Colorado Ste ate e hapter of the A. B. A.... 240 Notice of Eighth Annual Meeting.................. as ne . 4.6 4. ore nee .....dune 18 Gradus :(wrinkled). *“Suljeur lee & a ¢ et =) is Epa = 29 |b Bb = Ee oO 5 bed 6 ey 5 5 BC. 5 =} q ag e inte 4 ‘ B 10 uo;}IPUo;D g | g | Seale 2B ey 8 |& a E ey Aqypos0 FT g B e es Li oO : "| || te : a) Ee | 5 A rs ise = aa ——_ == & “KIINV,T DIOHA ‘XUNV,] TLVIGIWW] ° “TIGL ‘4¢ iuonunp papurpy-21qaa,y 4Of UOYNIYSUT PUDjaULA fo sajDWwUL YUN pa}DBUUOI uD SlaquiaU asoym sarpiuDf zgy fo saur Ayrpasey fo hunwung 272 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE which is presented here, it will be noticed that the Vineland force have reported on over 5,000 people as to their positions in hereditary lines connected with inmates of the Vineland institution, involving the study of 225 families. It is unnecessary to dwell upon the details of these reports, which are presented elsewhere, except to note that, so far as the investiga- tion has gone, there has been no instance discovered of a normal child resulting from the mating of defective parents. The committee feels that the way is opening for large, interesting, and important results. A COTTON VARIATION WITH A SELF-FERTIL- IZED ANCESTRY SAMUEL M. Bain Knoxville, Tennessee In the spring of 1906 the writer began a project in connection with the cotton-breeding work of the Bureau of Plant Industry, U. S. Department of Agriculture, to determine by accurate experiment the effect of northward or southward change of seed on the season of maturity of Upland cottons. For the starting point three varieties were chosen, viz., the Ramsey, a Louisiana variety; the Triumph, a well-known variety of Texas origin, and the Tennessee Greenseed. It is somewhat fortunate that of the three most pronounced varia- tions from progeny rows in the field, after some six years’ experience in breeding Upland cottons, one should have occurred in a pedigree culture. The Tennessee Greenseed is an old variety which a generation ago was apparently almost universally cultivated in Tennessee, and per- haps within the northern limits of Alabama and Mississippi. The stock used in these experiments came from the plantation of the late James Walker, of Lauderdale County, Tennessee, and grew within three or four miles of the Mississippi River. Mr. Walker had never during a period of thirty years permitted any other variety to be raised on his farm, and had used his own gin exclusively for his own crops. A typical plant of this variety was chosen in 1905, and the seed was planted in a row on the farm of the Tennessee Experiment Station at Knoxville in the following year. It may be stated in this connec- tion that, owing to the several climatic factors involved, the season Bain::A Corton VARIATION Dies suitable for cotton growing is at Knoxville considerably shorter than at the Mississippi River, more than 400 miles west. From an experi- ence of six years with the crop in both sections the writer has learned that there is a difference of fully three weeks in the time of safe plant- ing of cotton seed between the two localities. As stated, seed from the plant above referred to was planted in the spring of 1906. That year and each succeeding year flower buds were covered with paper bags and securely tied on the day before the blossoms opened. These bags were allowed to remain attached to the bolls for several days. Under favorable conditions a very large percentage of blossoms treated in this way have set perfect fruit. After four generations of self-fertilization there is no apparent deteri- oration of vigor in the offspring. The only object of this experiment was to determine the effect of latitude and concomitant climatic factors on maturity. An effort was made to avoid any definite selection, though on the few days chosen for covering buds in midsummer naturally the plants having the larger number of flowers at the time were the ones most likely to be perpetuated. No marked difference was observed in any of the progeny rows until 1910. Unfortunately, the difference that then came to light did not attract attention until after October 28, when all the plants were killed by frost. On a subsequent visit to the plots, the astonishing contrast be- tween three of the progeny rows and all the others was visible. Every plant in these three rows was stout, strict in habit, and at least a third taller than its cousins in the other rows. Moreover, the crop was quite late in maturing. This was shown by the fact that the short season had not permitted half as many bolls to reach maturity and open as in the other progeny rows. Both these points come out clearly in figure 1, which shows adjacent progeny rows, the left- hand row representing the variation. In fact, a casual inspection of the plots after the plants were killed by frost would indicate a greater difference between these two progeny rows, the self-fertilized descendants of one ancestor four generations back, than existed be- tween any two of the original varieties with which the experiment began. The relationship of these three tall progeny rows is shown in figure 2. The progeny rows marked E, F, and G, the ones under discussion, are shown to have come from three plants out of a single progeny row in 1909. This row must have shown some such indication in 1909, 274 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE but it was not observed or recorded, perhaps because of unfavorable conditions for the difference of habits of growth to become manifest. In figure 2 is exhibited one seed from each plant grown in the cul- ture of 1910 (except two overlooked by mistake). These seeds were taken at random, one from each plant, and are shown in a vertical row above each lettered circle indicating the twenty-three progeny rows of 1910, from A to X, inclusive. The seed in progeny rows E, F, and G, are seen to be distinctly larger than the average of those from the other rows, and exhibit a distinct tendency toward smooth- Fia. 1 ness or absence of tuft. On inspection of progeny rows B, C, D, it was observed that the plants almost uniformly matured somewhat later than in the progeny rows A and H to X, inclusive. They also showed a slight inclination toward the slender habit of E, F, and G. For the origin of this mutation we are, therefore, to look back to the exclusive common ancestor of all six of these progeny rows chosen from the crop of 1907, as clearly indicated in the genealogical lines proceed- ing from that circle in the diagram shown. It appeared to the writer as quite interesting that such a distinct variation should appear in a self-fertilized line. While the temptation Bain: A Corron VARIATION 275 is strong to generalize on the results of such a phenomenon, especially in view of two other somewhat similar results obtained under field conditions with other varieties of cotton, the purpose at present oe “ “« eP «e od id od aS aw ead Fie. 2 is merely to record the experiment. Very similar variations from Triumph cotton are discussed by Mr. O. F. Cook, in “Local Adjust- ment of Cotton Varieties,’ Bulletin 159, Bureau of Plant Industry, U.S. Department of Agriculture, pages 20-25. These were the result 276 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE of transfer of seed from one locality to another, with a considerably smaller contrast of climatic conditions than the case cited in this paper. Much larger numbers of plants were used in the Texas ex- periments, but the seed had not been produced under conditions of self-fertilization. HEREDITY ONE OF THE LARGE CON- TROLLABLE FORCES® Hon. Wiuutet M. Hays, Washington, D. C. Science has at last undertaken to organize the business of plant and animal breeding asit has organized mechanics. The world has come to see that the force of heredity gives rise to economic values Just as truly as the force of electricity. The laws of heredity are beginning to be formulated by scientists as other investigators are building up the sciences which underlie mechanics. Breeders are devising meth- ods for creating new values from the many domesticated species of plants and animals as other men are inventing machines. Breed- ers are creating larger values, in the form of larger yielding strains of corn, wheat and vegetables, again in the form of larger meat and butter production, or yet again in form of speed, beauty or strength in horses and combinations of form, color and fragrance in flowers. None will be more surprised at the advances arising from the study of heredity than those who make a study of the purely physical sciences in relation to mechanics. The word breeding is no longer suff- ciently comprehensive to designate the science of heredity and its practical application to the improvement of living forms. The broader word genetics has come into use, to signify man’s activities in approaching the truth about this abstract force called heredity and also in utilizing the new knowledge in efforts to improve the types of plants, animals, and men. j The term “breeding,” which was long used in connection with the improvement of domestic animals, is now applied quite as much to plants. The fact is that ia the past decade plant breeding has over- taken animal breeding both in tecbnique and in achievement of remarkable results, thus illustrating the rapidity with which genetic subjects are being taken in hand. And now that science has entered ®Condensed from an address before the American Breeders A3s9clation, Fab. 1, 19Lt. Hays: HEREDITY A CONTROLLABLE FORCE 277 the field of human descent, a third division of genetics has gained recognition under the name eugenics. Five years ago the first Conm:mittee on Eugenics was formed by the American Breeders Assos ciation; recently, by an almost unanimous vote, the Association changed this Committee to a Section of Eugenics, codrdinate with the Plant Section and the Animal Section. A whole category of new words is being provided to express the newly discovered facts and phenomena of heredity and the newly devised methods of breeding. A new literature is rising as a result of the discovery and elaboration of Mendel’s laws, nearly as voluminous as the literature which grew out of the labors of Charles Darwin, and of even more definite character. Mendel and his followers promise to have as profound an effect in developing the science and methods of evolution by systematic effortas Darwin and his followers had in bring- ing the world to believe innatural evolution. Darwin’s followers were over-zealous in ten thousand times proving the correctness of his general theory. Mendel’s followers show earlier signs of being satisfied with over-sufficient proof, and they are entering mightily into the effort to make his discoveries of large and immediate use to the world. With Mendel’s methods of analysis and synthesis they are studying even the intricacies of human descent. They are showing that those unit characters which represent the worst of human dross may be discarded and that the better elements of human nature may be recombined in races of people averaging stronger physically, brighter intellec- tually, cleaner morally and withal more efficient as members of society. No one can as yet speculate as to the effect the science of genetics may have in helping humanity to evolve into races with superior heredity. Heredity may be crudely likened to a fabric woven of many kinds of fibers and with many colors. Under this general conception of the nature of the “network of descent,’’ suggested by Dr. O. F. Cook, the following observations may be made: That there are units in heredity or unit characters which may be likened to the units or individual strands of the woven fabric. That some of those units may be likened to different classes of fibers used in making the threads; others in the heredity of a species may be likened to the different fibers or threads of the fabric; others to the form of the fibers, and yet others tothe strength of the fibers. That someunitcharactersmay be likened to the entire fabric produced by the loom; some to the form patterns laid on the surface of the fabric by the loom; and some to the color patterns worked out by bringing to the surface of the fabric 278 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE threads of specific colors. Thus in living things there are woven into a systematic network general characters, as of form, color or habit; also characters of secondary importance, as of minutiz of form, detail of color; and even characters so small as ordinarily not to be dis- cernible. There are characters of prime importance in the makeup of plants and animals which broadly compare with the general appear- ance of the fabric, secondary characters which compare with the figures of form or color which may be woven into the fabric, and even characters relatively more minute than the almost microscopic fibers of which the threads of the cloth are made up. In reality, however, even the intricate organization of the product of the most complex modern loom but very crudely illustrates the delicate intricacies of heredity in the network of descent in living things. The simile will also serve in another direction because there are agencies in the generative cell which determine how these unit char- acters shall be woven into the network of descent; as in the modern loom the perforations in the loom-ribbon determine which keys shall release the shuttles bearing the threads into their proper place in the fabric; or as in the street organ the perforations in the music- ribbon determine which keys shall strike the notes in making the har- mony of the music. The really stable part in the heredity of plant, animal or man is not the individual body—this runs its course and dies—but rather the germ plasm, which holds within its substance the well-nigh 1m- mortal threads of descent. These compete for place as they run through successive generations and are woven together in somewhat unique fashion in each individual. The discovery by Mendel and others that unit characters are inherited in pairs and appear in numeri- cal proportions in the progeny was a great biological surprise. But the significant genetic facts are: that units of character are the stable parts of heredity; that, like the threads and colors of the cloth made in the loom, they may be so manipulated as to leave out of the combi- nation those characters which are less desirable; and that the choicest characters may be recombined in individuals of higher excellence and higher average of efficiency. In some cases this elimination and recombination can be accomplished formally, while in other cases it can be accomplished only informally as by the aid of large numbers of hybrids. In the light of the wide general experience of the breeders of plants and animals, efforts at mathematical recombination, while very impor- tant, represent only a small part of the intricate and truly large prob- Hays: HEREDITY A CGNTROLLABLE FORCE 279 lem of gradually buildmg up improved networks of descent to meet all the agricultural conditions in which plaats and animals are used. As a matter of fact, breeders are coming to recognize the fact that this new philosophy of breeding will serve as a guide in the details of breeding work. The most of the work of animal and plant improve- ment will continue to be selection, including the discovery of the occa- sional mutation and the immediate or gradual segregation of this blood into a new variety or breed. Thus, even with this new science of heredity, breeding will still be mainly an art, and scientific methods will be used to supplement it. Thus, with many plants and animals, statistical records of performance may be widely used in determining the relative economic values of the different strains and families. In the breeding of many species there is relatively little opportunity for statistical methods, and a very wide range for the use of the judg- ment of the trained artist in discovering mutating qualities and in making desired combinations by crosssing and hybridizing. In some species the large results secured have come from mere art, and the use of very large numbers to find the occasional mutation and in the segregation and selective development of the mutating plant or animal. Substantial advances are being made in cytology, which is the study of the internal anatomy and functions of the generative cell. Some of these questions are necessarily very abstruse and hard to investigate. Among them are these: How do the characters of the parents pass through the generative cell into the progeny? How does one character, as color in cattle, remain dormant in one or more generations, and then the progeny of a later generation reappear in apparently unmixed purity? It is clear that since the living organ- ism carries the power of reproduction from one generation to another, carriers for the general, secondary, and minute character are multi- plied every generation, so that each is represented in the generative cells of each individual among the progeny. Thus the new genera- tive cell contains all the character determiners which control the complex makeup of the mature individual. The new conception given by Mendel has helped to clear up the question of the influence which environment exerts on heredity in case of unit characters which have remained intact through thousands of generations of individuals and now powerfully maintain their unit purity in the presence of the opposing members with which their heredity carriers pair in the plasm or substance of the generative cell. The manner of origin of these unit characters, as horns in cat- 280 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE tle, color of eyes in man, stiffness of straw in wheat, and their heredity carriers seems to be the next great work for genetics students to attack. The breeding of animals has been left largely to private enterprise. While numerous new varieties of plants have been originated under public auspices, very little has been done in originating new breeds of animals at public expense. True, there has been some public assistance to associations in testing the cows of members so as to weed out the unprofitable ones, and in organizing associations for the ownership of superior sires, and some aid has been given to the dairy breed associations in their praiseworthy work with advanced registration based on records of actual performance. France and other countries have subsidized especially good sires so that they would be kept in certain districts, thus improving the live stock of those districts. Russia and other countries have done something at producing on government breeding farms, breeds or sub-breeds of horses for army mounts. The Department of Agriculture in coép- eration with the Colorado Experiment Station has begun an experi- ment to produce heavy harness horses. It is also codperating with the Vermont Experiment Station in improving the Morgan breed of horses. Together with the Minnesota Experiment Station it has assisted a codperative association of breeders in establishing a cir- cuit for the creation of a sub-breed of Shorthorn cattle known as milking Shorthorns. It has a similar relation with the North Dakota Experiment Station in aiding an association of breeders to establish a codperative circuit breeding association in creating a sub-breed of Holstein-Friesian cattle. The literature in reports, books, genetics aan and other publications already indicates that genetics is to be very fruitful in technique and in practical facts relating to the direction of the forces of heredity so as to make not only our plant and animal produc- tion larger but also to give us a cleaner and more efficient network of human descent. Our agricultural colleges and agricultural high schools, and other schools which give instruction to farmers, are beginning to take hold of this subject in its new form and to create new courses of study which are scientific, practical, and valuable from a cultural point of view as well as important from the standpoint of practical plant and animal improvement. Our educators and even our moral and religious teachers and leaders are beginning to study the newer phases of the subject of heredity in relation to their work. The first decade of the twentieth century will serve to mark the time when science laid hold of the subjects of heredity and breeding Hays: HEREDITY A CONTROLLABLE FORCE 281 in their larger constructive relationships in developing moral and general worth in men, and there is no phase of this subject which is now coming forward in a more significant way than the science of eugenics, or the improvement of the network of descent in the human family. When the movement for world peace shall have centered all national power in one great federation, the patriotic instinct will become altru- istic in a far broader way than now. The absence of strife with the outside enemy will leave the impulse of patriotism free to develop along lines of efficient service to the whole human family. More than ever men will have patriotic pride in adding a new scien- tific fact, a new invention, a new piece of literature, a new variety of plant or animal, a new law or a new method of so organizing society as to make for the betterment of particular communities or of the whole race ofmen. The production of good citizens and the improve- ment of the heredity of the race, as well as the securing for all people superior environment, including education, will become a racial movement. Eugenics will become one of the practical sciences. Patriotic people will not only desire to know the general values of races, families and individuals, but they will desire also specific knowl- edge of the presence, value and persistence of the unit characters of which their heredity is made up. It would seem that in no other function is our patriotism so unguided as in evolving lineages of human descent. In our boasted patriotism in times of war, we have been blind to the fact that wars destroy a large percentage of our best men, giving a larger place in the continuance of the nation to the heredity of second-best men. Dr. Jordan’s work in this Association has shown that this alone should be a most potent reason for the cessation of wars. Wars, instead of being necessary to keep up the virility of the race, weaken it. It isnot too optimistic to believe that under the direction of eco- nomic, political, social, and eugenic science we are to strengthen the blood currents of the nation, as well as greatly improve the envi- ronment of the individual. War as a means of world uplift has been overestimated. The value of science and altruism are never over- estimated in making a better race of men. That the scientific study of this subject is a patriotic racial duty can not longer be denied. To recombine and perpetuate those units of character which compose strong individuals, families and races and multiply them so that they may form a larger percentage of the whole 282 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE human family will come to be true personal patriotism. On the other hand, to produce people below the average in efficiency, and especially to combine unit characters which increase the defective and criminal individuals and families, will come to be considered defi- nitely unpatriotic. Patriotism, in its broadest and even in its religious sense, must be appealed to, that those families with the most efficient heredity may multiply rapidly and become a larger and larger percentage of the whole human family in each generation. In the absence of an awaken- ing of this patriotic eugenic sense the efficient and well-to-do now, in too many cases, instead of having families large enough to rapidly increase their types, are having so few children that they become relatively smaller and llerams portions of the population with each generation. On the other hand, some weak, defective and criminal families are annually becoming larger and larger parts of the entire national heredity. And society, having protected them, through sanitation and charity, has helped this last-named class to become a relatively larger part of our population than when the law of the sur- vival of the fittest had a freer scope to work out its harsh decrees. It must be recognized that the great middle producing classes—our farmers, mechanics, and other manual workers—are our balance wheel in genetics as in economics and in politics, and our strength in times of war. Among them there is wide genetic variation as to indi- vidual family and racial efficiency. Eugenic patriotism to be effect- ive must be generally operative among these substantial classes which produce the bulk of the efficient young to do the work of each generation, because from among this great class come most of our leaders. The fact that science has started to organize eugenics is at present the striking new thing; and who knows what the future may develop? Whatever the result, it will not be visionary, aad the movement, while conservative, may not be so slow as have many other movements for human betterment. The aim of eugenics will not be different from that of education, physical, intellectual, and moral. It will be only another and more certain method of producing men and women of ideal character. The ideal remains the same, but the unvarying natural laws will be brought to bear in bringing about the desired result. Eugenics will help in producing a race which will more readily respond to general education and moral teaching; on which no money need be wasted in combating evil tendencies and weaknesses. Hays: HEREDITY A CONTROLLABLE FORCE 283 The deductive scientific method having found a foothold in rela- tion to heredity in all living things, living protoplasm has more than ever come under the dominion of man’s will. He proposes to weave new networks of descent in the form of plants which shall store up the energy of the sun more abundantly than any plants heretofore; other new networks of heredity which shall transform plant sub- stance into more meat, milk, work and other forms of superior animal products; and yet other networks of human descent which shall make higher ultimate uses of the energy stored in plants and in ani- mals and that supplied by mines of coal and oil and by waterfalls, waves, wind, and by direct sunshine. The living fires of life are to burn brighter with less loss of precious genetic energy. Life itself is to be placed deeper and deeper in the crucible of scientific research. The pure metal is to be saved and the dross is to be discarded. A purified human heredity will aid in devel- oping a better home life, in securing more effective education, and in leading to more effective religious teaching, in the production of superior races in all countries. Freedom from inborn weakness and from evil tendencies inherent in the heredity will be freedom indeed. But the time will soon have passed when the burden of our efforts should seem to be directed toward showing the importance of the development of heredity and breeding. The time is ripe that we assume that all we have claimed is true, and that we should hereafter turn our attention to methods of work and to securing the means of support for definite projects, that the largest possible results may be secured. To nearly fifty committees of the American Breeders Association have been referred the problems of methods of breeding each class of plants and animals, and the study of heredity in man. These committees are beginning to frame up plans for the wider coéperation of public departments and experiment stations with associations and individual breeders. They are giving encourage- ment and even direction to research both as to the laws of heredity and as to methods of creative breeding and the general variety and breed improvement by growers of pedigreed plants and animals. The Association’s Annual Report, wherein are preserved its more scientific papers, and the American Breeders Magazine, its new peri- odical devoted to the popular phases of genetics, are most efficient agencies for the preservation of the reports of the investigations of genetic science, and are beginning to have a wide influence among practical breeders. This Association has brought into codperation the genetic scientists of America, and many across both the Atlantic 284 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE and the Pacific oceans. It has shown practical breeders that its efforts to bring the work of these scientists to them in its annual meetings and in its publications are successful and worthy of wide support and codperation. It has organized the investigation of eugenics, so that genetic science is being applied in a most remarkable way to the study of heredity in man. It has not only proven the need but it has organized a basis for a genetics society of a hundred thousand members. ‘A hundred thousand members and a billion more of farm products annually” will make a good slogan. The American Breeders Association has been signally honored by the National Corn Exposition in thus setting apart a day as its dis- tinctive day. The management merits great commendation for having developed this exposition so distinctively along lines which blend the economic and the social, the vocational and the educational. ESTABLISHING A BREED OF ALFALFA FOR THE IRRIGATED LANDS OF COLORADO W.-H. Orin Moscow, Idaho We all realize that alfalfa is one of nature’s choicest gifts to man. No plant of such economic value has been studied and grown so many centuries; no forage or grain plant today shows so little breeding as alfalfa. It has many and varying characteristics, and no distinct breed as yet has been firmly and satisfactorily established either in the Old World or the New, although this plant was an established forage plant in Persia before Greece and Rome had a place in history. More than a decade ago the writer began testing the power of the alfalfa plant to reproduce its foliage and leaf characteristics in its offspring. He started the alfalfa breeding work at the Iowa Experiment Sta- tion and later, at the Colorado Experiment Station, sought with his co-workers—Prof. Fritz Knorr of Fort Collins, Prof. P. K. Blinn of Rocky Ford, and Mr. E. B. House of Greeley, Colo.—to establish for that state a hardy vigorous type of alfalfa with a desirable quality of forage of sufficient yield to render it especially attractive to prac- tical farmers. Each coédperator used’ his own plan for obtaining the desired re- sults. To supplement the strains already under investigation the writer secured through Mr. J. M. Westgate, of the U. S. Department Otin: ALFALFA FOR IRRIGATED LANDS 285 of Agriculture, seed from practically every alfalfa growing nation in the world. Mr. House seeded in rows 30 inches apart. Mr. Blinn seeded in hills 20 inches apart, each way, so the nursery could be cul- tivated with the beet tillage tools. The writer and Mr. Knorr, at Fort Collins station, seeded in hills 3 feet apart each way. We preferred this latter method because it facilitated isolation in the wire mesh gauze frames which we placed on certain units or plants which were the objects of special study. Two years were given to the study of types and individual differ- ences, which we found in the various centgeners of the alfalfa nursery. It was observed during the first winter that many plants in certain centgeners were winterkilled, the per cent varying from 2 and 3 to 80. The higher per cent in all three alfalfa nurseries was observed to be in centgeners planted with seed from the warm climate countries. The second winter there was a fine illustration of the “survival of the fittest,” all the more tender types practically dying out. We now felt we could begin to determine from these more hardy surviving plants the proper ‘‘mother plants’ from which to secure the desired breed. ; Certain plants were selected for unit study, each having one or more desirable characteristics. These plants were surrounded with breeding cages of wire mesh fine enough to keep out bees and other insects likely to transfer pollen. Artificial pollination was practiced on these mother plants and others having desirable traits to transmit to offspring, so that few or no undesirable traits became established in the progeny. A second series of tests was to determine the percentage of leaf to stem shown by selected plants. First the foliage was cut just as the blossoms began to appear and was weighed green. The foliage was air-cured in a closed room, then weighed again. The leaves were then carefully removed from the stems and weighed. The “green weight” varied from 14% ounces to 90 ounces per plant. The air- dried weight ranged from 52 ounces to 28 ounces. The per cent of leaf to stem varied from 23 to 58. The third series of tests consisted of a study of stem growth and stooling power of the unit plants. At the Fort Collins nursery some 200 plants were deemed worthy of special study the second year. Our first test cut this down to 100, our second test to less than 20, and our third test to but 2 plants, Nos. 15 and 19. These plants seemed to combine the most desirable and the fewest undesirable traits of all the plants under study. For prepotent power, erect 286 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE stem growth, width of leaf, and per cent of leaf to stem (53 per cent), the writer chose No. 19 as the ideal mother plant. This was an off- spring from Grimm alfalfa which came originally from the Minnesota Experiment Station. Prof. Blinn found his leading mother plant to be No. 7 incentgener F. This plant is a direct descendant of South Dakota No. 167, brought out by Prof. W. A. Wheeler at the High- more, S. Dak., alfalfa nursery. It came originally from Northern- grown seed, and seems to be identical with the Grimm alfalfa. In the matter of stem growth both No. 7 at the Rocky Ford nursery and No.19atthe Fort Collins nursery showed better stooling qualities than any other plant and in addition the stems were erect, vigorous, and bore a wealth of bloom and leaves. No. 19 had 10 per cent more stems than any other unit plant under study in the nursery. Where the normal leaf was } inch to 2 inch wide and ? inch to 1% inch long, No. 19 had leaves from ?inch to 3inch wide and 1 irch to 12 inch long, thus indicating the most desirable foliage. The fourth. series of tests was the root test. At the Fort Collins Nursery our work was interrupted by college changes, both Professor Knorr and myself going into other work, and our selected and choice No. 19 as well as our other selections were destroyed, the alfalfa nursery giving way to an oat crop. At Rocky Ford Mr. Blinn con- tinued the breeding work, as did also Mr. House at Greeley. While Professor Knorr and myself found there was a difference in root maintenance, and some difference in constructive root growth, it remained for Prof. Blinn to find out just what caused that difference in the vitality of various alfalfa plants. This he did in the season of 1910. To satisfy himself that he had really discovered an essential principle and that it was not a local trait, Prof. Blinn visited many alfalfa nurseries throughout the country during the growing season of 1910. He found in each nursery this same trait in the more promis- ing plants. Then he knew he had discovered a most valuable and vital principle in the root growth of alfalfa. It enables him to divide all alfalfa plants into two classes as far as root growth is concerned. All plants, seed for which came from warm climates, have a pro- nounced tap root, with but few if any side or lateral roots; all plants from Northern or cooler climates have a dominant tap root but carry pronounced and important side or lateral roots. For this reason if any accident occurs to this tap root, cutting or rotting it off, there remains enough strength in the lateral roots to enable the plant to reéstablish itself. In case of the Southern type the plant dies. Hence we see why this Northern type is so much more vigorous and hardy. CuHasE: Twins, EUGENICS 287 Progeny from No. 19 have been preserved, and this season of 1911 Professor Blinn will determine which shall be the unit mother of the particular breed which he shall propagate for Colorado conditions. The essential traits he seeks to have inherent in this Colorado breed of alfalfa are as follows: (1) Hardiness or resistance to winterkilling. (2) Resistance to leaf spot or other foliage diseases. (3) High percentage of leaf to stem. (4) Medium-sized leaves and medium-sized stems. (5) Good seed-producing power. A definite pedigree will be worked out and an attempt made to keep the strain pure. From several thousand plants we thus see two plants stand out. These two are almost invaluable because of the inherent possibilities which lie within them. Each of these plants may produce a progeny that will increase the yield at least 1 ton per acre under field conditions, to say nothing of the improved quality of the hay. This will mean millions of dollars to Colorado alone each year, and what must this improvement mean to the nation? Members of the A. B. A. are urged to encourage Professor Blinn in his efforts to evolve this desirable and much needed breed of alfalfa. TWINS, HEREDITY, EUGENICS JoHN H. CHASE Cambridge, Mass. There are two kinds of twins; those so much alike that it is hard to tell them apart, especially in youth—called duplicate or identical twins; and those who seem to be no more alike than ordinary brothers and sisters. Some biologists have claimed that identical twins spring from the same germ cell, which becomes accidentally divided, and therefore all qualities which depend on heredity will be the same for these twins. But since environment is almost identical for twins it is hard to separate the qualities produced by their environment from those produced by their heredity. It occurred to us, however, that environment was just as strong for two ordinary twins as for two duplicate twins, and therefore qualities produced by environment should make ordinary twins alike. If duplicate twins are more alike than this, then the “more” is produced by heredity. Perhaps 288 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE this residuum—this ‘‘more’’—if it could be segregated, would solve the problem. Thinking that this was at least worth investigating, we wrote to the secretaries of about forty American colleges, asking if they would be willing to send the names and addresses of any twins now in college, or any whom they remembered as having graduated. We felt that college men and women would be more interested in the problem, better able to analyze themselves, and more likely to return a ques- tionaire than any other group. We obtained in all the names of about one hundred and fifty pairs of twins, fifty of whom answered. About thirty were “identical,” and twenty “ordinary” twins. The questionaire sent to them was as follows: QUESTIONS ON HEREDITY No one knows what qualities are inherited, and what are acquired after birth. If we could know exactly, it would be a great advance for science and a great help in education. It has been discovered that duplicate or similar twins probably occur because the original germ cell is accidentally divided; therefore, duplicate twins arise from the same cell. As a result, their inheritance should be the same, and the qualities in which they differ must have arisen after birth. If, then, the twins of the United States are willing to answer certain questions, they may be able to solve one of the greatest problems of science, namely, What part of our nature is due to heredity and what part is due to training? Would you, therefore, be willing to answer the following questions which will be confidential? I. PuysicaL.—(a) Are you and your twin ‘‘duplicate twins,” namely, during youth, did you look very much alike? (b) How much do you and your twin differ in height? (c) Strength: Could you always lift equal weights, or has one always been stronger than the other? (d) Health: Has one always been more sickly than the other? Have you had the same illnesses? (e) Look at the palm of your hand; halfway between the end of your finger and the first knuckle, the tiny ridges in your skin twist round into a pattern. Have you and your twin the same pattern for corresponding fingers? II. Menrau.—For which one of the following subjects have you a special aptitude? (If you both like the same thing, put two crosses in front of it; if your preferences differ, mark the subjects separately.) Only mark one sub- ject—your chief preference and the chief preference of your twin. (a) Mechanical interest. (b) Natural science. (Especially fond of nature and animals.) (c) Business ability. (d) Musical ability. (e) Artistic ability or appreciation in any way. (f) Literary. CHASE: TWINs, EuGEntcs 289 III. Emotionau.—(a) Are you equally social? (About the same number of friends.) (b) Are you equally fond of the opposite sex? (c) Have you the same interest (or lack of interest) in religious things? (d) Have you similar dispositions or temperaments? ~ Do you know of any other twins to whom we could write? Remarxs.—As far as we know, this is the first investigation of this kind, so if you think of any other likenesses or differences, or distinctive qualities of interest, or have any suggestions, please write them on the other side of this sheet. NAME: ADDRESS: The answers were as follows: | Duplicate twins. Ordinary twins. Feature. —___—___—_— |. —— - | Alike. | Unlike. | Alike. Unlike. HAs Fae ERS RIS «oo OV eicievic)s Selon s p= op awiwisse ne 20 6 3 12 SHEP EERE IS reek alters ev cioite ls cya’ aisles clelsale © eee ns eivlas «| 22 3 5 7 IERGAT MEME eS eee areiiia od stoic cic os seis si sisieicibia 01m sleTamcie vis 23 2 5 7 LOT RET OVS TALS 5) Ae.gt CAEL OGRE Aaa Ge ae Ieee aes 16 1 yy 5 Meare ead PP rere e earart aie ete sc cio oi c-vretass aheieve S.sieted'a’suw svere’etene 16 6 2 10 SONI Hl enter a rae feelin lata ee ieee Siciain ota eis gieie ete siete ele Firs 21 1 9 4 SOs DTD TIT abs CED OCCO HE eRe oe eee 26 1 11 2 TREE ELIE. gone Ta dae BOD COORD EAD Een NEE eee 26 2 5 PRT ELSIE Ue rctereeiact cries aleve clnlratooule «ce cisleweree « RATS Peas 18 7 4 10 4 A leeway of half an inch was allowed for crude measurements, high heels, or wavy hair. In the case of strength, health, finger prints, etc., no leeways were allowed. What results can we glean from these figures? First, that the theory of “identical twins” in the literal sense of the word ‘‘identi- cal” is probably disproven. Although duplicate twins are alike, they are not exactly alike, as they should be on the theory of accidental division of the germ cell. Especially sad for this theory is the fact that fundamental qualities such as eye color may vary while all other physical and mental features are duplicated. There seems to be no general law for this variation; the three duplicate twins out of the twenty-four who vary in strength do not include the two who vary in health, although health and strength would seem closely related. Out of the nine features studied there is not a single characteristic which is alike between each pair of duplicate twins. Prof. Edward L. Thorndike gives more elaborate proofs of the same point in his “Measurements of Twins.” But if the theory of identity vanishes, there is another law which seems to emerge and which is the all-important conclusion of our work. 290 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE It is this, that, no matter what the physiology, embryology, or meta- physics of twin formation may be, statistics show that duplicate twins are, on the average, three times more apt to be alike than ordi- nary twins. Now the importance of that law lies in the fact that if duplicate twins are bound by a triple cord of heredity then they give a standard by which we may determine whether any given trait is hereditary or produced by environment; for we can ask a large group of adult twins concerning any given trait. If their answers respond to the 3/4 law the trait in question can be regarded as an hereditary quality, while if not it must be regarded as being produced by environ- ment. For instance, let us apply the lawtothe study above. Finger prints, height, strength, health, mental tastes, and temperament are 2.4 to 3.8 times stronger in duplicate than in ordinary twins, which with so few returns is as near the law of three as could be expected. But religious taste, sex attraction, and sociableness are only 1.35 stronger in duplicate than in ordinary twins. Therefore, as far as our returns go, we are warranted in saying heredity has little to do with our re- ligious, or sexual, or social natures; but it is the all-important element in our health, our strength, our temperament, and our mental tastes. Now I do not claim that these results concerning definite things such as religious taste are completely substantiated, for our returns are too few to form final judgments on so important a subject; but I do claim that the above method (the law of three) is correct statistically and scientifically for solving and not for theorizing about the great prob- lem of heredity versus environment. It is a method for determining way down into detail the smallest parts of our nature that are inher- ited. Our study above might not have proven this law, but Dr. Thorndike carried out definite measurements—such as circumference of head, width of head, length of finger joints and forearm, eye color, hair color, word tests, ete-—among 50 New York City school children who were twins, and he found the same law applied among these definite measurable factors. Unlike us, he found difficulty in distinguishing between duplicate and ordinary twins. But Francis Galton found no difficulty on this score, and not a single one of our questionaires was returned with uncertainty on this point, while popular opinion, which is often a good judge on social questions, almost universally recognizes the fact of there being these two types of duplicates and unlike twin. If, then, the law of three be substantiated, it can be applied to problems, such as the following: CuasE: Twins, EUGENICS 291 Is cancer transmitted? For instance, if, by an exhaustive ques- tionaire, duplicates were found to be three times as liable as ordinary twins to cancer, then this disease could be considered hereditary. The same method could be used in determining whether consumption was inherited or was simply a tendency. Are certain crimes volun- tary or preordained from the time a child is born, and therefore should & given criminal be taken to court or to a hospital? What are the great hereditary departments of mind and taste that the directors of our vocational bureaus, employers, teachers, and children themselves should know in choosing an occupation? A close study of our returns would seem to show that “art”? and “music” should not be separated, while ‘‘literary taste’ upholds its separate existence as an heredity department, although at first we did not even mention it in the questionaire. Again, it could be determined through a more exhaustive investi- gation whether our results concerning health and strength are correct —namely, whether they are dependent almost entirely upon heredity, and very little upon a gymnasium or environment. Francis Galton in his study of twins even concludes that diseases are preordained not only as to their occurrence, but also as to the time at which they wili be contracted, because so many of his twins had the same diseases at the same time when in different parts of the country. Our results are not detailed enough to bear on this question, but they do show that health and strength are very dependent upon heredity. Professor Saleeby says that the reason Greece and Rome and every ancient civilization came to fruition and then declined is that bar- barism by its stern life kills the weak; but as civilization advances a chance is given the weaklings to find some little niche in society where they can do a small work and live, and where comforts will sus- tain their feeble existence and allow them to have children, until finally these weaklings accumulate to such an extent that they are not able to support the civilization that their strong virile ancestors have built up, and the whole structure of society topples over. We could preserve the cumulative good effects of civilization and our own robust lives if we would consciously bring about the breeding of the strong and capable; instead of making it necessary for the weak to be eliminated by natural selective processes; or make it necessary for civilization to return periodically to barbarism in order to be purged. If it is proven that a predisposition to illness and lack of stamina is inherited, then weak people who know that they will hand on their misery to their children should refrain from marriage, just as at pres- 292 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE ent many with a family tendency to insanity are refraining from marriage. Again if our conclusions be correct, bad tenement houses, child labor, lack of playgrounds, etc., may determine ill health and weak- ness in a measure, but a weak, degenerate father or mother would be a much larger factor in the result; and if this be true, an over em- phasis has been given to these environmental influences as compared to the far more important subjective of hereditary influence. If as much time were spent in forming public opinion and legislation against allowing those of feeble mind, those of feeble body and those with an abnormal hereditary taint to have children, and in encouraging— even by means of a public or private pension if need be—large fam- ilies among the especially able, public spirited, and strong, then our civilization would be saved, and then our sturdy descendants would be amply able to attend to the matter of forming a pleasant and healthful environment for themselves. For we can probably breed capacity and goodness as well as strength. In the past it has been objected that there was no way to determine exactly, so as to compel popular assent just what qualities were inherited and to what extent. But twins have now been found to be the magicians who can unravel the skein of this mystery that has puzzled our fathers for generations, and whose solution may now be the means of arousing such a new, practical, workable interest in the new science of eugenics that our present civilization may be saved instead of having to swing like a pendulum back into barbarism. This can be done by having the attention of our philanthropists, women’s clubs, reformers, insurgents, the Outlooks, the Surveys, the 15-cent magazines, our Ben Lindsay’s, and Roosevelts turned from an almost exclusive study of how to better the world through improy- ing environment to the more important subject of how to better the world by improving the race through the laws of heredity, and by spreading the knowledge of those laws broadcast through society so that the people of America and all other civilized countries will gradu- ally change present customs and practices in conformity with the new knowledge, to the end that the nations may go forward toward a greater physical and mental perfection. If they fail to comprehend this thoroughly, to reform their lines of advance, it is inevitable that within a few hundred years they will have to fall back into fighting barbarism. Eugenics, with the study of twins as a basis, can be a strong factor in this general advance. INHERITANCE OF “ACQUIRED EPILEPSY™ Dr. L. B. ALFoRD Monson State Hospital, Mass. Brown-Sequard (i860) stated in one of his series of articles on Brown-Sequard ‘“‘ Epilepsy” that he had in a few instances found the condition in the offspring of “epileptic”? animals when there had been no operative interference. Westphal (1870) confirmed Brown- Sequard’s results, but a number of other observers, including Dr. Taft of the Monson State Hospital (1910), were unable to confirm them. This work, primarily a study of the nervous mechanism of the phenomenon, has demonstrated that it is the poorly coérdinated, simultaneous action of a number of defensive reflexes. These reflexes have become unusually active as a result of frequent repetition. The incoérdination following the experimental lesion has rendered the movements ineffective in removing the exciting stimulus, and the constant presence of these stimuli causes many unsuccessful attempts to remove them. By actual count, the number of scratching move- ments has been found to be greatly increased. The exciting stimuli have been found to be the vermin that infest the bodies of practically all guinea pigs, and when these are removed the “epilepsy” fails to develop or disappears if it is already present. Any lesion that dis- turbs the most important defensive reflex, the scratch reflex of the hind leg, will be followed by the “epilepsy.”’ Besides cord lesions, and section of the sciatic nerve in the bip, the lesions which Brown- Sequard found sufficient—removal of the toes or even removal of only the distal phalanges—are followed by the condition. This ac- counts for the presence of “epilepsy” insome of the offspring of Brown- Sequard animals, he having found that in all cases the inherited “ epi- lepsy”’ was associated with a loss of the toes on the hind feet of the animals. Anything that affects the reflex condition of the cord has a similar ‘influence on the epilepsy. After spinal irritants such as caffeine and strychnine it can be obtained with greater ease, but following an injection of a small amount of alcohol it quickly disappears. It was found to occur in a more severe form after removal of the higher centers, and can be obtained with great ease after destruction of the cerebellum and section through the lower part of the pons. It may even occur in normal animals after such an operation. It still re- 4 Read before a meeting of the research committee of the Section of Eugenics, at Palmer, Mass., May 1, 1911. 293 294. AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE mains after a double cervical cord lesion, a semisection on one side in the upper cervical and on the other side in the lower cervical re- gions. After cord lesions movements may occur in an attack in limbs paralyzed for voluntary motion. Thus not only has the presence of the condition in the offspring of Brown-Sequard’s epileptic animals been accounted for, but also the condition itself has been shown to be of such a nature that inheritance would not be expected. METHODS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF SORGHUM A. H. Lripie# Kansas State Agricultural College, Manhattan, Kansas For some fifty years the various sorghums have commanded an increasing amount of attention in the United States. During that time the actual progress in producing sorghum varieties has been made mostly by determining which were adapted to certain localities. With the settling of the non-maize producing districts a greatly increased importance is being given to many types and varieties of the sorghums. 7 For the past eight years the writer has been associated in various places with projects which have involved the improvement of the adapted sorghums. The results thus far show that very little im- provement has ever been accomplished in America. Of the early efforts to increase the sugar contents of the sorghums we can say that no known result remains except from a variety testing stand- point. C. P. Hartley has produced a broom corn cross with sweet sorghum. A. B. Conner, C. R. Ball and the writer have tested varieties and aided in distributing some of them. Dr. C. O. Town- send has done some very definite work on the syrup and sugar sor- ghums. A. M. Ten Eyek has probably had a better opportunity than anyone else to take up already adapted varieties and increase their usefulness. Each of these men have worked more or less dis- connectedly along independent lines. There has been no coédrdina- tion of ideas and no well defined technique has been developed. In outlining a project for the improvement of the sorghums at the Kansas Agricultural College the writer has decided to test the production of sorghum from bagged heads. The purpose is to com- pel self-fertilization. Assuming that these plants are naturally self- fertilized it seems fair to suppose that most of the variations within LeipigH: THE IMPROVEMENT OF SORGHUM 295 a given variety are due to crossing between different plants. If we can eliminate this without reducing the vigor or productivity of the crop we will have made a great step in advance. The work accom- plished by Shamel and others on tobacco is probably an illustration of what may be done with sorghums. The writer has assembled data from the men mentioned above. They agree that this group of plants are self-fertilized. Conner, Ball, Ten Eyck, Townsend and the writer have all produced viable seed from flowers protected by bags. Conner, Ten Eyck and Townsend have produced two or more generations of plants from bagged heads. They were forced to resort to bagging because of the proximity of other varieties. That is the work was done simply from necessity. C. R. Ball bagged heads to guard against insects. The writer bagged heads to eliminate danger from head smut at flowering time. Because the work of bagging has been done incidentally very little importance has been attached to it as a practical method for constant use. However, Ten Eyck used it at least four years and some of the strains are now very largely grown over the state with excellent results. Connor states that a particular strain of Orange sorghum which he grew two generations from seed, bagged each year, possessed extraordinary vitality and vigor and was remarkably pure and uniform. Townsend says he has had similar results. The writer presents these observations here in the hope that this will stimulate experimenters and farmers to test this method. Several men who have had a great deal to do with this crop during the past few years say they are about ready to abandon the head-to-row method of testing varieties or individuals. This they unanimously state is because of cross pollination. They hold that cross pollina- tion practically destroys the identity of the individual strains in a short time. To these men especially I suggest the bagging method. It should make it possible to eliminate the remnant system. It ought to accomplish its purpose whether one variety or hundreds are being grown. The Kansas State Experiment Station has this year started work near the extreme northwestern corner of the state, to produce seed of the sorghums which are adapted to that locality. Kafir and Milo in particular are subject to variations and splitting up when grown there from seed grown in lower or more southern parts of the state. It is hoped that a few years of selection accom- panied by bagging the heads before flowering time will give us not only desirable but also uniform types. Seed so grown may prob- ably be used generally throughout that part of the state with much greater success than is now possible with seed not locally grown. 296 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE hee VIEW OF THE FLOWER BREEDING PLOTS ON THE PLANT BREEDING FARM OF ANDRIEUX, VILMORIN AND Co., VERRIERES, FRANCE BrotocicaL (Genetic) Lriprary, Farm or ANDRIEUX, VILMORIN AND Co., VERRIERES, FRANCE EDITORIALS THE BREEDING OF MAN Between methods which may be employed in the improvement of the heredity of the human species and the improvement or modifica- tion of other living things there are some decided and fundamental differences. In forms of life lower than man, useful variations can be arbitrarily segregated and multiplied. Thus, a new variety of apple or wheat originating from a single mother plant may supplant all the parent variety in a certain section of a country or even an entire country. Ora new variety of corn, or a new strain or breed of cattle or horses, originating from a group of superior parents, may take the place of the parent variety or breed. No such simple processcs, however, are available in the human family. In the present state of information and sentiment we have no means which will encourage the best families to multiply somewhat more rapidly, but the State may place restrictions around marriage of the insane, imbecile, de- fective, diseased and other racial undesirables and thus by elimination have no less direct influence in bringing up the average heredity of the race. Society may even soon see the wisdom of tabulating the breed- ing values of all families, thus to emphasize to the strong their racial value, and to the weak their genetic weaknesses and the fatalities which are almost certainly in store for their offspring. As a matter of fact, society, through charity, helps to keep alive a very large percentage of the weak children of the least successful families; in war we destroy the strongest, most virile of our men; both factors are active in depressing the average value of the racial blood. Choosing the capable few as the progenitors of a new race, as can be done with plants or animals, and rapidly making their blood that of the race, is impracticable with the human race. On the other hand, something can be done, even if that be quantitatively only a small percentage of what can be accomplished with wheat, cotton, apples, or cattle. For instance, we can arrange to so record the lin- eage and genetic values of all families that the racial value of each strain of blood may be known; we can privately provide bounties for children born to parents with a superior rating, the bounty to be pro- gressively large as the number in the family increases; we can educate men to avoid venereal diseases, alcohol, and other agencies which decrease their value as parents; and we can be somewhat more exact- ing in licensing only the fit to marry—and to kill fewer strong men in war. 297 298 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE The throwing together of different racial types develops not only economic and political problems, but eventually hybrid race problems of the most far-reaching character. The hereditary values of the pure races as compared with the hybrid race should be studied from every standpoint. Records of the performance values of all individuals would soon give data upon which to base the breeding values of each parent; and of estimating the breeding value of each person from whom progeny are not yet available for records on which to base parental values. Thus those families whose genetic values coincide with the average of the racial values would be known; also those families averaging above as well as below the normal for the race. In this manner the particulars in which the best families excel, as well as the lines of weakness of the weaker families, would be available knowledge. No one can more than conjecture as to whether statistics of good qualities and of faults in the heredity of young people would cause fewer marriages or more marriages on the whole. In reply to those who would argue that the possession of such information would lessen the number of marriages, increase the social evil, and even decrease the production of children, it may be said: The larger proportions of really happy marriages sensibly contracted would make marriage popular. The assurance arising from a better knowledge of both con- tracting parties as to the success of the issue would lead people to look upon marriage as more certain of a happy ending. Threatened pen- alties of being ruled out of matrimony on account of unfitness would be a tremendous inducement to lead many persons to courses of rectitude, and to care in preparation for parenthood. Society and the church would increase their approval of good mar- riages the issue of which is likely to turn out well. People would in this, as in other affairs of life, do nearly as they are expected to do. The possession of facts would give assurance that an intelligent inter- est would be taken; and this interest would work out for good. The truth prevails in the light of day. Well conditioned marriages of people of strong power to succeed in life’s affairs and with faith in their eugenic ability to rear strong and healthy children would bring the blessing of at least average sized families. A community made up entirely of suecessful people would in time have a large surplus of means with which to take the risk of doing well by large families of children. The removal of the fear that children will be defective, weak, sickly, unsuccessful, or will go wrong, will give people both the courage to rear children and the family pride to have a goodly number of children and grandchildren. EDITORIALS | 299 SOMETHING MORE THAN THE COMMERCIAL INSTINCT NEEDED Seldom, if ever, has a man achieved marked success as a breeder of improved live stock who has not perpetually cherished a real fondness for live stock extending far beyond that mere financial interest which dictates to a considerable degree the operations of the majority of men who would be cailed live stock breeders. Often there lies be- neath a rugged exterior of a man, a genius not unlike that of the artist to whose eye every feature and every line in conformation of an animal contributes either to its beauty or ugliness. The imagination of the great artist goes beyond that of the plebeian critic. It takes an artist to appreciate the work of an artist. Just so the achievements of the master breeder are best appreciated by other distinguished breeders. The meat or milk producer sees nothing in the animal but its ability to produce beef or milk. The breeder demands certain other points of excellence, which for want of a better term may be called embellish- ments. The breeder has a right to satisfy his tastes in the matter as long as these tastes do not detract from the usefulness of the animal or add materially to its cost. The breeding of pedigreed live stock, without permitting sentiment, embellishment, and “fancy points” to enter into it, is like insisting that four walls and a roof constitute home, or that the farmer should not locate and construct the house and other buildings with reference to making them sightly and attractive. Fancy points should not be encouraged to the exclusion of utility. Utility in improved live stock is fundamental. Breeders of pedigreed live stock in the United States are no longer scarce but live stock breeders of significant achievement are rare. Many farmers have been inveigled into the breeding of improved live stock by the promise of attractive profits. Reported fabulous prices for individual animals have been the magnet that has led many farm- ers to abandon the more conservative practices and engage in breed- ing pedigreed live stock. Only those who have had extended experi- ence in the breeding and sale of improved live stock can fully realize the full cost of the outstanding animal that brings the unusual price, to say nothing of the countless cases where fabulous prices have been reported, which have never been realized except as credited to the breeders’ advertising account.—Hrrserr W. Mumrorp, Urbana, Til. GENETIC SURFACE INDICATIONS Beginning about a third of a century ago, there developed a school of animal breeders with a philosophy which has had an enormous 300 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE influence. Its leaders, vigorously but in part thoughtlessly. dealing with the genetic economics of our live stock industry, occupied some position as writers most advantageously in touch with the live stock world. Some of these leaders were chosen as judges at fairs and even teachers of anima! judging. Their work covered all classes of live stock, including poultry and pet stock. That school of breeders imagined that in a brilliant and artistic literature of word painting it had a philosophy. The influence of this philosophy has helped to breed out the milking qualities from the heredity of American Shorthorn cattle; held back the dairy develop- ment of the Red Poll cattle; kept back improvements in breeding for excellence in egg laying in poultry; delayed the development of tense fiber, endurance, easy keeping, and longevity in our draft horses; and made possible that greatest of all American live stock fiascoes, the Belgian hare craze. This philosophy enthroned form and fat above genetic power as the criterion of individual exce'lence in the show or sales ring. Outward signs of excellence usurped a place above inherent breeding power. Centgener tests such as are now used in dairy cattle and speed horse breeding were long laughed out of court by those who spread their philosophy over millions of pages of reportorial and editorial rhetoric concerning beefy draft horses, steers which exhibited the greatest profusion of beautiful lines and curves, porkers whose exteriors of fat padded skins most nearly met the artistic ideal in the mind of the man who happened to be judge that year, and mutton animals with the pre-sheared fleeces. Even the results of such transition tests as milk- ing tests of cows at fairs and egg-laying tests of hens were treated as matters of small import and received but scanty mention. There was a grandiloquent magnification of form which blended with the excitement of the sales and show ring—a manifestation of the excitable character of many of our people. Tt would not be true to assert that emphasizing the outward appear- ance of the individual has not had a very high educational value; or that it has not given the American people vastly higher ideals of excellence to be striven for in animal breeding. It has helped to make possible our live stock fairs and our live stock auction sales; and has been a strong factor in leading many to enter the breeding of pedi- greed stock in a large way. It has enormously encouraged the begin- ner at upgrading his stock, also the beginner at breeding pedigreed stock, to make his start to pay commensurate prices for a pedigreed sire or for a purebred foundation herd. Nor would it be fair to say EDITORIALS 301 that there has been no progress in the breeding of our meat stock and work stock. But it has gone on, not so much because of, as in part in spite of the partial philosophy of those who with voice, pen, brush, and camera have exalted the individual outward appearance above internal genetic power. Some of the progress which has been back- ward has been largely due to this ingrowing philosophy which has been wedded to a system which yielded ‘‘copy,” and yielded adver- tising with accompanying editorial write-ups. The facts and figures developed under the performance record tests, as for instance in ad- vanced registration of dairy breeds, do not require wordy descrip- tions nor highly colored full-page advertisements to sell the breeding animal whose progeny or close relatives give a high average of pro- duction. The trotting horse with very many progeny or other close relatives showing a high record of efficiency in performance on the race track does not need much rhetoric to convince the prospective purchaser of the breeding value of its blood. The injury done has been in assuming that we already have great excellence in our breeds of meat stock and work stock, because per- chance we have an occasional phenomenal individual. When we com- pare animals of the beef breeds with animals in the advanced regis- tries of the dairy breeds, we see that our meat-producing breeds of live stock have not been subjected to rigid tests for real genetic as well as individual merit, nor have they been improving at so rapid a rate. The breeders of beef, pork, mutton, poultry, and work stock have already too long assumed that tests of performance, so successfully worked out with dairy catile, and centgener tests of wheat and corn and other plants, could not be applied to other breeds. These un- warranted assumptions have too long led breeders to depend on the continued importation of choice animals of the breeds created in the British Isles and western Europe, without an effort to do as was done in the old countries and create new breeds and sub-breeds. But a new movement is in progress, thanks mainly to Mendel and his disciples, and to a school of optimistic plant breeders who for a decade have been devising methods and getting results in creating new varieties of useful plants. Plants which seemingly presented vastly more difficult problems than Hereford cattle, Berkshire swine, Rambouillet sheep, or Shire horses have been brought under perform- ance-record breeding, and newly created varieties are being turned out. The most advanced breeding today, it is safe to say, is done with corn. And the most important and the most difficult features in corn 302 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE breeding are applicable to the work of creating new values in the breeds of live stock. In fact, some of these features are being em- ployed by some of the few animal breeders who do really creative breeding. The writers and teachers of the old school to which reference is here made have been guilty of sins of omission to a marked degree. They have failed to see the most important elements in the philosophy which guided Cruikshank in creating a family which has put short legs and easy feeding quality on Shorthorn cattle, or to see what guided Gentry in producing his record-breaking herd of Berkshires. The word artist who, seeing only the outer appearance of the steer, the sheep, the pig, the draft horse, the nicely pencilled fowl, or the symmetrical ear of corn, has been so blind that he has made the too sweeping generalization that inbreeding is wholly wrong, but which Bates, Cruikshank, the Funks and others have so abundantly disproved. Inbreeding is dangerous when weaknesses are present, but it is a most powerful agency in keeping pure the very best stocks, whether of plants or of animals. By repeated trial Gentry found that his inbred crops of pigs were far better than those resulting from outcrosses, and he was sensible enough to obey the law of nature as practically worked out in the pigs rather than follow a theory which does not apply to all families even of hogs. Not only has the aforesaid philosophy of the supremacy of form and appearance been in the way of a scientific knowledge on the part of the common breeder of purebred stock, who usually is a multiplier of genetic values secured from others, rather than a creator of new genetic values, but it has been especially harmful in retarding men and associations from undertaking real, constructive, creative breed- ing. : But the light is breaking. The old school is beginning to see the philosophy of the occasional mutation in the blood of which, if guarded by narrow breeding, there is held the basis for breed improvement. And young men less hopelessly grounded in the principles of the old- time stock sales oration, or stock show editorial, are entering the live stock editorial field. There are even strong rays of hope in poultry editorial circles. The camera is now telling the unexaggerated truth, where formerly the pencil and brush supplied excellence to all flesh indiscriminately. Animal breeders, in the half century after Darwin put forth his world-changing philosophy in 1859, were practically static. A score of years of scientific and brilliant breeding on the part of plant EDITORIALS 303 breeders about the first of the new century was necessary toawaken them to the vast constructive opportunities in animal breeding. The possibilities from Mendelian recombinations in cross-breeding; the necessity of using vast numbers in creative breeding; the need of col- lective effort, as in the circuit scheme of animal breeding; the utility of system and order carried out on a large and uniform scale in the effort to create breeds with capacity to yield products at lower cost, and the opportunity for the application of scientific efforts on a large scale, are only the entering wedge. There are many things which portend the rising tide of scientific development in animaland plant breeding, and the mission of the American Breeders Association is to lead the van. The totality of heredity of animals in the world, part of which have not yet been imported, and part perhaps as yet un- tamed, is a mighty force which we can mould better to meet our needs. Our rich home market for pedigreed live stock, supplemented by the possible foreign market for purebred animals, will make not only possible but relatively easy a great movement in the creation of breeds and families of all kinds of domestic animals whose genetic records will gain for the successful breeders both fame and wealth. The breeders of dairy cattle have only begun to show what can be done all along the line in this and other countries with all classes of farm animals, including fur animals and pet animals as well. The live stock journals will continue to exploit and conserve the interests vested in the existing commercial herds. And it is well that they should perform that important function. But henceforth there will grow up more facts concerning the inner genetic values of breeds and especially of families within the breeds and the writers, auction- eers, and teachers will thus have figures and genetic pedigrees, which will enable them to conserve and exploit those animals which breed best, rather than merely the prettiest individuals. In fact a change for the better has already taken place in case of species where per- formance records have longest been recorded. THE LAW OF VAST NUMBERS Practical experience in the improvement of living things through breeding demonstrates that the law of vast numbers must be re- spected. One phase of this law is that one among many is superior as an individual to its fellows. A second phase of this law is that among many of those superior individuals there is one superior also genetic- ally, excelling in its power to transmit its superiority to its offspring. 304 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE In other words, among the thousands or even tens or hundreds of thousands which make up a variety, a breed, or a species there are only a few mutating individuals which transmit marked superiority. A third phase of this law of vast numbers is that to effect general improvement in a variety or breed the progeny of the individuals which prove genetically the best must be multiplied into vast num- bers, that they may supplant the individuals which have lower genetic value. These statements of fact would at first seem hardly worth the dig- nity of being called laws. But these three facts should be burned into the minds not only of those who try to create new values in plants and animals but also of all genetists, whatever their scientific or practical interests in breeding and heredity. In part because of disregard of the law of vast numbers and the following of plans numerically narrow, most of the efforts at creative breeding fail to produce stocks which are really valuable or new or represent material advance. On the other hand the relatively large numbers of the really important mutating blood lines which spring up through the everyday work of growers and modest breeders are due primarily to the vast numbers constantly passing under review in everyday production, and as growers become better trained, not only to see mutations but also to seize upon them and subject them to clonal and seminal centgener tests, their discoveries will increase. Our farms and nurseries for plant breeding as well as our establish- ments for multiplying superior varieties and breeds of domestic plants and animals should be laid out so that the scientific methods of inter- mating and selection may be carried out on a large scale. There is here need of largeness of plan and equipment, and the work of the producers, especially the producers of pedigreed plants and animals, should be so systematized that mutations, wherever they arise, may have a chance to gain the eye of someone who will appreciate them and give their blood a genetic opportunity. Preliminary ard preparatory to all nursery work and other tech- nical work in plant breeding, the law of vast numbers should be re- spected by so testing many varieties as to secure those which may be the best bases for the work of breeding. Large numbers must be used in the nursery in the work of hybridizing and selecting. And to follow the work out to the end of practical trial by growers, a rather large number of the newly formed varieties should be taken from the preliminary trials of the plant-breeding nursery through the field plat trials at numerous trial grounds, as at branch experiment stations. Epi TORIALS 305 There is, however, one place where it does not seem wise to adhere to the plan of large numbers, namely, where it comes to distributing new varieties of plants to growers. A few rigidly tested very best varieties will do more good than a larger number of best and second- best varieties thus distributed. A commercial] variety enters a com- plicated set of farm conditions and often a still more complicated set of market conditions. Especially is this true of a product like cotton or wheat; here the method and machinery for the manufacture of the new variety must be readjusted, and in some cases even radically changed. The market must learn of the character and quality of the new potato, apple, or melon, and in some cases the grower must adjust his farm conditions to give the new variety the proper culture or treatment. Thus, in making new tall-growing varieties of flax, it was found that a new scheme of crop rotation was necessary to pre- pare the land and clean the soil of weed seeds, to avoid the necessity of separating weed fibers from the flax fiber. In animal breeding the individuals to be used as bases for breed improvement or for the creation of new breeds must be chosen with care from among the very many animals of the foundation breed or component breed which have the largest practical value, first indi- vidually and then genetically. The individuals of families which appear best are collected and their genetic value determined in the terms of their progeny; these again are tested and retested generation after generation, so as to eliminate the poor characters and recombine the best characters in a comparatively narrow line of descent worthy of advanced registration on a performance record basis. There must even be provision for bringing into the newly forming sub-breed the blood of superior families which may spring up in the herds of other breeders, just as Williams of Ohio has provided for the introduction into his stocks of pedigreed corn of the blood of corn mutations orig- inating with other breeders. The animal breeding circuit scheme was devised in part to overcome the disadvantage of the small numbers in private herds, also in part to retain superior blood once it is secured, that it may serve perma- nently as a source from which superior pedigreed breeding animals may be secured and thus widely disseminated. This plan quite avoids the faults of the course pursued by many wealthy breeders who gather into the one herd some of the best blood of the breed, sometimes securing the progeny of one or more mutating animals and perchance thus securing a collection of animals which if kept together and rather narrowly bred might have a high value as a permanent 306 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE source of pedigreed breeding animals. But there is often no one to continue the owner’s work, or else his successors lack the genius to maintain high standards, and the herd is dissipated. Thus the cir- cuit scheme, by banding together a group of breeders in a codperative association and providing for a successor when a member drops out, makes permanent the sub-breed. Here, as in the selection for distribution of only the very few varie- ties of plants, the breeding of animals is narrowed down to an inter- breeding group, strong physically, efficient in their special functions, prepotent in upgrading and splendid as purebred stock, whether for the production of marketable products—such as meat, milk or wool— or for work. There are needed plant and animal breeding stations employing technical men in each logical agricultural region, certainly several in each large state. Animal breeding circuits are needed for each breed of horses, sheep, cattle, and swine, and even for poultry. Still other circuits should be very profitable to produce hybrid breeds, as be- tween European and Indian cattle, between cattle and buffalo, between common and fat-tailed sheep; possibly also to produce breeds of deer, foxes, and other semi-domesticated species. Few men advocate government ownership of purebred stock, and certainly those who now enjoy the individualistic business of pedi- greed animal production would not favor turning this business over to governmental agencies. On the other hand, nearly every person agrees that it is the proper function for the federal and state governments to so codperate with codperating groups of breeders as to give governmental supervision and aid so as to have scientific plans carried out which will compass all that science can do when large numbers are handled in a scientific way. The greatest exam- ple we have of circuit schemes of breeding is the circuit breeding of corn, as centered in the Ohio Experiment Station at Wooster, with which many breeders of pedigreed corn codperate. Here the public scientists give direction, but the farmers get the educational, inspir- ational, and economic value of doing the work. The North Dakota Holstein Breeding Circuit is making very satisfactory progress; and the Minnesota Milking Shorthorn Breeding Circuit is doing well, excepting that it lacks the needed large number of herds. Many people shrink from developing large projects in breeding. But the possibilities along this line are as great as in the public and private irrigation and other engineering projects. There are needed more men who can plan enterprises in breeding, and especially men EDITORIALS 307 who can take these plans and stay by them for the long period of years necessary to get results. The business of breeding plantsand animals by scientific organizations only awaits general demonstra- tions showing the large things which can be accomplished to gain its place as one of the important affairs of public and private interest. AN OPENING AND A NEED The editors have received a request to recommend a man trained in genetics as a teacher and researcher in a state university. A man is wanted who is not only strong on animal breeding and well trained in statistical methods, but qualified also to head a department of genetics, to direct the work of assistants, and codperate with practical breeders. The fact that such a place goes hunting for the right man brings forcibly to view certain features concerning our animal breeding. The men who breed pedigreed animals, write books on animal breed- ing, and edit periodicals for animal breeders have been caught nap- ping. They have too long remained content with a philosophy half a century old, which is dim, unscientific, and impractical. These men should rub their eyes and observe that the days of Manly Miles and his book attempting to interpret Darwin’s great work have passed. They need to take stock of the new order of things and to look about them for a more scientific and vastly more practical basis for the work of creating new values in our breeds of domestic animals. Our agricultural colleges are especially in need of developing in- struction and research in genetics in relation to the improvement of domestic animals. Our breeders are expending vast sums of money in experiments which, because of a lack of scientific direction, are largely futile. The majority of our farmers are using either scrub stock, grades so crossed as to be often little better than scrubs, or _ pedigreed animals of indifferent character. That a large number of the latter are thrown out by any efficient system of advanced regis- tration based on performance shows that even the pedigreed breeds are in need of scientific improvement. The results of the Jersey and Holstein advanced registry work are clear proof of the fact that our pedigreed breeds need to be placed on a performance record basis. The stale contention that the production of meat breeds, breeds of work horses, and dual purpose breeds of sheep and chickens can not be placed on a basis of performance records is finally beginning to give way. 308 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE The breeding of corn, cotton, flax, apples, wheat, alfalfa, and other crops is being placed on a scientific basis; yet in each case there were problems which a dozen years ago seemed vastly more difficult than the problem of placing the breeding of Percheron horses, Shorthorn cattle, short-grass-country sheep or such dual purpose chickens as Plymouth Rock on a performance record basis. For our colleges of agriculture to sit idly by and not prevent such monstrous travesties on economic production as the division of a breed into three breeds of different colors instead of applying the same science and energy to the reduction of the cost of meat and eggs is evidence of lack of interest in that line of production. What are our so-called biologists doing that they persist in being ‘‘interested”’ in plant and animal life and not practical in making that life more useful? Why have we not developed more animal husbandry scientists who have seen more deeply into genetics than does the devotee of the show ring and the sales ring, where the phenomenal individual wins over the genetic mutant? There are signs of a scientific awakening in animal breeding such as occurred in plant breeding a decade ago. As then the plant breeders learned and received inspiration from the animal breeders, so now the animal breeders can learn and gather inspiration from the plant breed- ers. Those who devote themselves to research in animal heredity especially need to keep in touch with those who experiment with heredity in plants, and those who would devise methods of improving a breed or creating a new breed of animals should study the methods of those who improve varieties of plants, or create new varieties. The deviser of methods for creative animal breeding is especially interested in the methods which are successfully used in creating new values in open-pollinated species, such as corn and cotton; here the process is much the same as in creating new breed values of animals. Twenty years ago those of us who desired to enter the field of exper- imental animal breeding found experiment station governing boards and legislative bodies not ready to furnish the necessary large number of animals with which to study the improvement of the heredity of the breeds. Now the situation is very different. The authorities are ready to be shown. Scientific agriculture has so fully made good that this branch of betterment work may now go forward, along with plant breeding, soil improvement, and other leading methods of in- creasing the production of food at less expense. In all the state colleges where live stock is a leading interest there is need of a division in charge of live stock breeding, quite unhampered EDITORIALS 309 with general institutional administrative duties. This division should pay especial attention to the education of men who can work as public officers or as private breeders in placing our animal breeding on a scientific basis. It should have large opportunities to give graduates training both in the art and in the science of animal breeding, as in the management of all forms of codperative breeding, from the mere cow-testing association to the highly developed circuit for breeding the various classes of horses, cattle, sheep, swine, and poultry. Its own experiment station and branch station farm herds often can be most useful parts of the breeding circuit, and in many cases these herds will serve as a means of working out the details to be used on the privately owned herds of the circuit. The very profitable market for circuit-bred animals bearing a gov- ernment pedigree based on performance records will eventually be- come so remunerative to the codperating breeder and to the state that there will be ample support for research, practical demonstration, and creative work in animal breeding. Numerous young men with instinets both for live stock and for research should take up practical live stock genetics. The demand will not be met in a decade, if in a generation. At present this field offers better openings for careers than forestry, engineering, chemistry, law, medicine, or most other professional lines. NEWS AND NOTES ON THE NATURE OF HEREDITY Since Bakewell pronounced his famous law, “Like begets like,”’ both practical men and scientists have done their best to determine just what heredity is. The original view was that “ Heredity is the force which causes offspring to resemble the parents.’”’? The tendency to vary was looked upon as a force opposed to heredity. For years this view was held, but the last decade has thrown new light on the subject. J. Arthur Thomson, in Heredity, defines it as the relation existing between an individual and its ancestors or offspring. He has here abandoned the old view that it is a distinct force, but looks on it merely as an existing chain uniting resemblances in different genera- tions. This view has merit, in that it divorces one’s mind from the general idea that heredity is a distinct entity or force. Caspar L. Redfield of Chicago has looked into this subject from the standpoint of an engineer and physicist, and says that heredity is the inertia of living organisms where two or more generations are involved. Transmission is the act of passing this inertia from one generation to the next. Inertia is the tendency of a body in motion to stay in motion or at rest to stay at rest. It is usually applied to non-living matter; but the comparison is apt, as then heredity would represent the inertia of a moving body while the individual is growing, and the inertia of a body at rest when full development is reached. While the comparison is not accepted as absolute, it offers an interesting field for one who would bring his breeding work to mathematical accuracy. The currept belief of biologists at the present time is that heredity is the ability of living matter to react or respond to its environment. Certain definite processes take place in the vital functions of an indi- vidual in response to certain causes or stimuli which exist in the environment or surrounding matter. As, for example, spring causes the shedding of the coat in the domestic mammals, and fall and win- ter produces a heavier one. In this case most mammals respond in a similar way to the same stimulus and in a manner different from reptiles. In the same way we find different responses in different breeds, in different families, and in different individuals. Heredity constitutes a response to the same stimulus in the same way between generations, varieties, breeds, species, etc. Variation then would not 310 News AnD Nores alt . be essentially different from heredity, response either not being so complete or more complete; or else reaction to environment sets an entirely new series of changes at work and a different result ensues. This latter offers a favorable field and does not differ markedly from some other ideas not mentioned except as they are looked at through the eyes of different individuals and from different standpoints. These ideas are most fruitful of future result. Some may criticise this, but if it be remembered that for certain organs and functions the presence and action of other organs and functions corresponds to external stimuli, then a logical phase results throughout. All life processes are physical or chemical in nature and under similar condi- tions will be always the same.—E. N. Wentwortu, Ames, Iowa. SIZE OF FARMS AND FARM FAMILIES The agricultural survey work in Tompkins County, New York, has shown that fair-sized farms, 160 to 300 acres, pay much better than small farms for general farming. Farmers on less than 100 acres are not often doing any better than hired men. The work has now been extended to two other counties with very different conditions, but the same results were found. The editorial in Volume IT, No. 2, of this Magazine raises the ques- tion of the danger to the character of the citizenship from such a farm. It is suggested that the writers have given too much attention to the economic side and not enough to the social side. We may say that our purpose has been to find out the facts. We have had nothing to do with making the facts. We had no theories to prove. Most of the conclusions have upset any theories that we did have when the work was started. The editorial also gives the impression that such farms call for large numbers of a permanent hired-man class and might go so far as to have only a few landowners in a school district. The following quotations show that no such condition exists or is likely to exist in New York. This does not mean that large ‘“‘bonanza’’ farms are to develop. We have no figures for such farms, as none of them exist in this county. The group of largest farms averages only 261 acres. All the farms are the typical American ‘family farm,”’ on which the farmer and his family do the major part of the farm work. Even on the farms containing over 200 acres, the family does half of the farm work. These figures may, therefore, be taken as suggesting the most profitable size forafamilyfarm. The larger farms seem to be better than the smaller ones for this purpose. (Page 416.) These figures do not throw any light on the desirability of the very large farm on which the farmer is so busy managing that he does not do any manual 312 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE labor. From observation the writers are of the opinion that such farms have many serious obstacles in their way. They are not likely to be able to handle labor effectively. The farmer who works with his men and directs them as he works, and who treats his hired men as equals, has a great advantage. (Page 416.) For general farming, these figures show that a farm should contain at least 150 acres. The upper limit of area is determined chiefly by the layout. With ideal conditions, with the buildings in the center of the farm, and with a public road running past the buildings, as high as 600 acres may be run from one center. With more than this area, the distance of the fields from the buildings is usually too great. It is not often that one can secure so large an area well located with respect to buildings. The most profitable general farms in Tomp- kins and Livingston counties contain about 200 to 300 acres of good land. (Page 427.) These farms do not call for any permanett hired-man class. On the group of largest farms, even those above 200 acres, the labor is half done by the farmer and members of his family not receiving wages. The unpaid family labor is nearly three times as much as on the small farms. Certainly there is no injury to society from a con- dition that provides work for the children at home so that they do not have to leave home to find it. In many cases, the hired man is the owner’s son who bas staid at home because there was a chance. On the small farm there was no such chance; hence, the boys have gone to town or if not entirely disgusted with farming have gone to the larger farms of their neighbors to become hired men. There is no danger to society from a size of farm that calls for one or two hired men oneach farm. It takes a number of years to earn money enough to start farming. One or two hired men per farm just about provide places for the young mea who are gecting started in farming. Cer- tainly there is no danger in a system that provides places for the man with no capital while he is working up. In the regions thus far stud- ied, there are very few men of ordinary intelligence who remain hired men permanently. They pass on to become tenants and owners, to make place for more young men. There are a very few men who will always be hired men because they are not able to manage themselves, either because of lack of ordinary intelligence or because of drink. For such persons, a chance to be a hired-man is a blessing. It is suggested that small farms with codperation will solve the prob- lem. There are physical difficulties that cannot be overcome by this means. Too small fields cannot be tilled economically even if you borrow your neighbor’s plow. One of the great points in economy is the driving of two, three, and four-horse teams. But such teams cannot. work well in smail fields even if two neighbors do combine. NEWS AND NOTES ala The farms themselves must be joined to get the full advantage of economy of production. But partnerships in farming are not often successful; there are too many points on which the two bosses dis- agree. I believe that any unprejudiced enthusiast on eugenics, if he could go with us to the three thousand farms that we have studied in various parts of New York, would agree that the family farms of 150 to 300 acres for general farming are much better than the smaller farms from the standpoint of citizenship as well as from the standpoint of profits. Such farms are large enough to permit horses and machinery to be used effectively, and large enough also to give the boys profitable work at home. No American institution is imperiled... Farmers are merely beeom- ing more efficient. Our Eastern farms were laid out in the days of the grain cradle. The number of men that were then necessary to farm 100 acres can now farm 200 and do it better.—G. F. Warren Cornell University, Ithaca, N. Y. BREEDING FOR COLOR ADJUSTMENT UNDER CERTAIN CLIMATES My observations on the effects of light and heat on the organism of animals have elicited some extremely important facts as to the survival value of colors. My former ignorance of the reasons why the Arab horse in a hot climate with his black skin tends to have white hair, and the Chinese pony in a cold climate the same, cost me exactly $200 ten years ago, and if the Government will act on the hint it will save $200,000 in a very short time. Breeders must breed for color where color enhances work, power, and endurance. * * * * Since then, I have obtained other facts which lead me to believe the matter of color in animals much more important than I formerly thought. The white horse or mule is particularly fitted for climates where the day is hot and the night cool, for by reflecting sun rays it remains comfortable when the black dies of thermic fever; and at night it does not radiate to colder surroundings, remaining comfort- able when the black gets pneumonia even though blanketed.—Cuas. E. Wooprurr, Surgeon U. S. Army, Panay, P. I. THE FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GENETICS The fourth International Conference on Genetics was held in Paris, September 18 to 23, under the auspices of the National Horticultural Society of France. The preparations for this gathering were com- menced more than a year in advance of the date of meeting. A 314 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE strong local committee was formed, presided over by Dr. Viger, sena- tor, and president of the National Horticultural Society of France, and with Mr. Philippe de Vilmorin as secretary, to whose untiring efforts a large measure of the success of the conference is due. About two hundred and forty members were registered and about fifty communications were presented, of which the majority dealt with subjects of a botanical nature. Most of the leading countries in Europe were represented, and delegates were present also from Northern Africa and from the United States and Canada. It is impossible, within the space of a short notice of this kind, to give abstracts of all the papers presented, and any attempt to select the most important from among them would be undesirable and per- haps futile. It will be sufficient to state that highly important com- munications bearing on Mendelian theory were presented by such eminent leaders as Bateson, Tschermak, and others, while many papers of a somewhat simpler and more immediately practical char- acter were also given. Some of the communications were illustrated by lantern slides, and others by plain or colored drawings. It is intended that all the papers presented shall be published in full in the volume of proceedings which is to be issued, and where illustra- tions are of importance these will probably be reproduced. The aver- age quality of the communications presented was certainly of a high order, and although the use of four languages (French, German, English, and Italian) added considerably to the difficulties of the majority of the audience, the papers were received, as a rule, with careful attention and every evidence of appreciation. Two of the shorter and therefore less conspicuous communications were of special interest to the writer of these notes, and he may there- fore, perhaps, be allowed to refer specially to them. Professor von Rumker of Breslau presented very briefly some of the results obtained by him in carrying on selections of rye for color of grain. He exhibited samples of seven different colors, three of which—dark brown, straw yellow, and bright -green—now breed true. Dr. Jesenko of Vienna made the interesting announcement that he has succeeded in obtain- ing a fertile plant by crossing wheat with rye. Although only one seed was obtained from the plant of the first generation, Dr. Jesenko was fortunate enough to obtain one hundred and fifty-two seeds from the plant of the second generation. In addition to the papers presented before the conference, attention should be called to a pamphlet on genetics by Mr. Philippe de Vil- morin, copies of which were given to all those in attendance at the convention. This excellent little pamphlet gives a brief account of the News AND NOTES 315 origin of the new science of genetics, with a bibliography (classified by subjects) of important publications bearing upon it and a list of all the papers presented at the previous International Conferences namely, London in 1899, New York in 1902, and London in 1906. From our side of the Atlantic the following papers were presented: W. A. Orton, Obtaining Disease-Resistant Varieties of Plants. F. M. Surface, Results of Selections Among Fluctuating Variations. W. T. Swingle, Variations in the First Generation of Citrus Hybrids. C. E. Saunders, Breeding Varieties of Wheat of High Baking Strength. G. N. Collins and J. H. Kempton, On the Inheritance of Waxy Endo- sperm in Hybrids of Chinese Corn. These papers, with the exception of that last mentioned, were presented by the authors themselves. The programme of the conference included five sessions for business of about three hours each, three receptions (by the Horticultural Society, the municipal council and Prince Roland Bonaparte), five excursions and visits to important institutions (to the Pasteur In- stitutes at Paris and at Garche, to the Vilmorin Trial Grounds at Verriéres and to the Veterinary School and the Natural History Mu- seum), and two elaborate repasts (a luncheon at the Vilmorin grounds and a closing banquet at the Continental Hotel.) The social side of the convention was managed with the utmost care and with attention to every detail that good will and hospitality could suggest. Nothing was left undone to make the foreigners feel that they were really guests and friends. The hours for social intercourse proved not only most enjoyable but very profitable, as they afforded opportunities for becoming acquainted with fellow-workers in various parts of the world and for conversation in regard to details of their work which were not presented in their written papers. The closing banquet was an event of which even Paris might well be proud, since it was characterised not only by an admirable menu but by a delightful series of speeches, not one of which was dull or too lengthy, and by a timely adjournment to a smaller room where groups gathered for coffee and conversation and for the saying of farewell. The request of the American Breeders Association that the next International Conference should be held under their auspices in America was presented to the conference, but no decision was reached in regard to the matter. An influential committee, with Professor Bateson as chairman, was appointed to consider and decide upon the date and place for the next conference. It is not expected that the decision of this committee will be announced for a considerable time. C. E. Saunprrs, Ottawa, Canada. 316 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE A SELF-SEEDING DOUBLE PETUNIA Mrs. Myrtle Shepherd Francis, member A. B. A., Ventura, Cal., reports the successful production of a self-seeding double petunia. Mrs. Francis, who specializes in breeding this flower, has a collection of over five hundred plants with double blossoms in a variety of colors. Several years ago the originator observed a number of flowers with rudimentary pistils and ovaries and as a matter of experiment pollen- ized them. After numerous trials she was rewarded with two par- tially formed seed pods. This year, only five per cent of the flowers grown from seed turned out singles. Selection will probably reduce this to a still lower figure. Mrs. Francis is developing also a yellow petunia and is working with poppies and the white and red flowering clianthus. FESTBAND IN COMMEMORATION OF MENDEL The Naturforschender Verein of Briinn is about to publish a com- memorative volume in honor of Gregor Mendel. About a yearago the simple and beautiful Mendel monument was unveiled at Brinn in the presence of a large number of scientists, or, better, Mendelians, and the work in question is proposed to follow as a literary tribute or monument to the great and modest man who has handed to the world the keys with whose aid the outer doors behind which are guarded the secrets of heredity were unlocked. The contents of the Festband follow: . Mendel, Gregor, ‘‘Versuche iiber Pflanzen-Hybriden.”’ Mendel, Gregor, ‘‘Hieracium-Bastarde.’’ Mendel, Gregor, ‘‘Die Windhose vom 13. Oktober 1870.” Baur, Erwin, Berlin, ‘“‘Ein Fall von Faktorenkoppelung bei Antirrhinum majpus.”’ : Cuénot, L., Nancy, ‘“‘L’Hérédité chez les Souris.’’ Fruwirth, C. Wien, ‘‘Zur Vererbung morphologischer Merkmale bei Hor- deum distichum mutans.’’ (Mit 5 Abbildungen auf 2 Tafeln.) Hagedoorn, L. Arend, Verriéres le Buisson, ‘‘The Interrelation of Genetic and Non-genetic Factors in Development.” Hurst, C. C., Burbage, England, ‘‘Mendelian Characters in Plants, Animals, and Man.”’ Iltis, Hugo, Briinn, ‘‘Vom Mendel-Denkmal und von seiner Enthiillung.”’ (Mit 2 Tafeln.) Kammerer, Paul, Wien, ‘‘Mendelsche Regeln und Vererbung erworbener Eigenschaften.”’ Nilsson-Ehle, H., Svalof (Schweden), ““Spontanes Wegfallen eines Farbenfak- tors beim Hafer.’”’ (Mit 4 Figuren.) Porsch, Otto, Wien, ‘‘Die ornithophilen Anpassungen von Antholyza bicolor Gasp.” (Mit 2 Tafeln und 1 Textfigur.) NEws AND NOTES 317 Przibram, Hans, Wien, ‘‘Albinismus bei Inzucht.”’ Roux, Wilhelm, Halle a. d. S., ‘‘Uber die bei der Vererbung blastogener und somatogener Eigenschaften anzunehmenden Vorginge.”’ Semon, Richard, Miinchen, ‘‘Die somatogene Vererbung im Lichte der Bas- tard- und Variationsforschung.”’ Shull, George Harrison, New York, ‘‘ Defective Inheritance-Ratios in Bursa Hybrids.”’ (Mit 6 Tafeln.) Tschermak, Erich von, Wien, ‘‘Uber die Vererbung der Bliitezeit bei Erb- sen.’ (Mit 3 Tafeln und 2 Textfiguren.) PUBLICATIONS RECEIVED Die SyYsTEMATIK UND MetHopik Der MopERNEN LANDWIRTSCHAFTLICHEN PFANZENPRODUKTIONSLEHRE. Prof. Dr. von Rumker, Breslau. Reprint from Frihlings Landwirtschaftliche Zeitung. 1911. pp. 409-421. IMPROVEMENT IN Corn. H. K. Hayes and E. M. East. Bulletin 168, Con- necticut Agricultural Experiment Station. 21 pp. 4 plates. This bulletin discusses the methods of producing crosses from dis- tinct types of corn and the value of the seed of those crosses for com- mercial crops. From tests conducted at the Connecticut station and elsewhere, the authors conclude that the fact of the increased vigor of first-generation hybrids of corn is of commercial importance, and that the project is worthy of further trial. The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station is desirous of entering into codperation with farmers to thoroughly test the value of first-generation corn hybrids for the production of commercial corn crops. A comparative test of hybrid and parent varieties, sent in by seven farmers coéperating with the station, resulted in showing that five of the crosses proved beneficial, giving higher yields by from 7 bushels to 44 bushels than the parent varieties grown alongside. Report OF THE BOTANICAL DEPARTMENT, NEw JERSEY AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE EXPERIMENT Station, 1910. B. H. Alfred Groth, Early J. Owen, Mary Robinson. Plant heredity studies are reported with beans, corn, eggplants, opra, peas, peppers, squashes, and tomatoes. Plant sap circulation, plant toxicology, and plant shading also receive attention. Hersetr. Talks with Women Concerning Themselves, E. B. Lowrie, M.D. 221 pp. Illustrated. Forbes and Company, Chicago, III. Herself is the third book in the series of Personal Hygiene books published by an author whose two preceding books received notice 318 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE in this department of the Magazine. The book before us is fully up to the high standard set by its two predecessors. So long as our common schools, or extension schools, or schools of personal hygiene, supported by private philanthropic enterprise, do not teach the important facts of the physiology of reproduction, motherhood and heredity, there will be need for such plain common- sense books as this. No attempt is made in this book at being scien- tific. It is not burdened with descriptive details but emphasizes mostly the instructive features. There is not in the entire book a term or a phrase which is not written in the plain English of the people. It is replete with sensible advice. One cannot help discovering in this book a sympathetic note coming from a woman whose experience in every stratum of society has led her to realize the need of a publication of this character. MeENnpDELISM. P. C. Punnett. 173 pp., 35 illustrations, 6 colored plates. Third Edition. McMillan and Company, Ltd., London. Since the publication of the first edition of this book by the same author in 1905 Mendelism has made remarkable strides. The appli- cation of Mendel’s Law as originally stated by its author—and, shall we also say, rediscoverers—has been immensely amplified, and as the experimental evidence accumulates the connection becomes clearer that Mendelism furnishes the only key we at present possess to the solution of heredity problems. Not only that, but that with the help of Mendel’s Law, genetics, has become practically theonly branch of biology, in which it is possible to formulate with almost mathemati- cal conciseness, representations of expectations of heredity processes. Repeated new editions of this book were really necessary to keep it abreast of advances and in this latest edition Mr. Punnett has not only brought Mendelism up to date but he has given Mendelism a very lucid, concise and direct statement. In separate chapters are discussed the various phases of Mendelism as understood today. Especially clear is the presentation of the sub- ject of recombination in individuals differing in one, two, three and more pairs of characters. Brief chapters take up the presence and absence theory, interaction of factors, reversion, dominance, wild forms and domestic varieties, repulsion and coupling of factors, sex limited inheritance, variation and evolution and so on, concluding with a chapter on Man and possible application of Mendelism to eugenics. The reviewer is of the opinion that the general reader of scientific inclinations, as well as the student will find this book valuable as a treatise as well as text book. ASSOCIATION MATTERS GROWING POPULARITY OF THE AMERICAN BREEDERS ASSOCIATION On December 26 last, Dr. A. W. Gilbert, professor of plant breeding at Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, sent in a batch of 102 new members, being mostly members of the New York State Breeders Association. These 102 men are a most welcome addition to the Association, and both the New York State Breeders Associa- tion and the American Breeders Association will greatly benefit by this arrangement. The prestige and assistance of the national organ- ization will no doubt be of direct value to the state organization. The accession of this large number of members of the New York State Breeders Association in a body speaks well for the popularity of the American Breeders Association and is an index of the growing confidence of the practical breeders in the propaganda of the Ameri- can Breeders Association. Other organizations of live stock breed- ers are invited to take memberships in the American Breeders Asso- ciation so that the national organization may rapidly grow to large proportions in order that it may make its work and plans more effec- tive. THE EIGHTH ANNUAL MEETING The eighth annual meeting held December 28, 29 and 30 in Washington in affiliation with the American Association for the Advancement of Science was a decided success, in point of attend- ance, in the number and quality of papers and addresses submitted, and in general interest and enthusiasm. In fact this session sur- passed all previous ones in these respects and a good part of our attendance was from scientists belonging to other biological societies. A large number of new members were enrolled. Mr. T. V. Mun- son of Denison, Texas, and Dr. Wm. Saunders, Ottawa, Canada, were elected honorary members of the Association. The Council decided to take steps to organize branch chapters of the Association at all the larger centers of education. PORTRAITS OF SCIENTISTS AND BREEDERS There are left a number of copies of the portraits of scientists and breeders, whose biographies were published in the first volume of the Magazine. The price of these portraits, which are done in sepia tone on sepia paper, is 10 cents each. A set of these portraits should be framed and hung in every lecture room for plant and animal breeding. 319 320 AMERICAN BREEDERS MAGAZINE COMPLIMENTARY WORDS FOR THE MAGAZINE I find the magazine very interesting and in fact almost necessary among the breeders of the country. I of course could not afford to be without it or not to be a member of the Association. I shall do what I can in the coming year to further its interests in the enlisting of new members.—Gero. F. FREEMAN, Tucson, Ariz. I enclose check for $2 for renewal of my membership in the Breeders Associa- tion, in reversal of my decision of a week since. For I have just read Dr. Van Eedon’s article in the August World’s Work, which has placed the need of eugenics stronger than I ever saw it put before. Two years ago I was interested in the breeding of corn. This has set me to thinking that perhaps the breeding of men is the only hope for the race.—O. E. Baker, Madison, Wis. We desire to congratulate you upon the splendid Magazine, and we wish you all the success so deserving an effort merits.—L. F. BraLE, Manager, Associated Farm Press, Chicago, Ill. I want to say that I consider the last report and the Magazines published to be the best ever and that they are worth many times the price of the annual dues.—Wo. F. Nye, San Juan, P. R. MEMBERSHIP DUES FOR 1912 Notices of memberships which were due to be paid in the first quarter of 1912 will soon be sent out. Members are respectfully requested to remit promptly and thus save the Secretary’s office the expense of later notices. University of Toronto ic B:pjoge th ibra Ay 2 iar) a Medical iy 4 3 peri Pier on p Me DO NOT REMOVE i: THE 2 CARD Z FROM | q THIS | a POCKET Acme Library Card Pocket Under Pat. “Ref, Index File” Made by LIBRARY BUREAU Journa DATE. | toe e