“HEARINGS Lay BEFORE THE _ i -_SUOONDLNTRE ON canna ‘orca "COMMITTEE ON ee | MERCHANT MARINE AND FISHERIES - HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES = _ BIGHTY-EIGHTH CONGRESS i ( SECOND SESSION ae : aE ) - JUNE 23, 24, 25, AND 30, 1964- Os Se oe aoe Serial No. 88-23. > Printed for the use of the ; Committee Ort enc aud Hisheries NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 HEARINGS BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON OCEANOGRAPHY OF TH COMMITTEE ON MERCHANT MARINE AND FISHERIES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES KIGHTY-EIGHTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JUNE 23, 24, 25, AND 30, 1964 Serial No. 88-23 Printed for the use of the Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries MIAN MBL/WHOI 0 0301 OOb94b3 4 I as MM U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 35-377 WASHINGTON : 1964 COMMITTEE ON MERCHANT MARINE AND FISHERIES HERBERT C. BONNER, North Carolina, Chairman EDWARD A. GARMATZ, Maryland THOR C. TOLLEFSON, Washington LEONOR K. (MRS. JOHN B.) SULLIVAN, WILLIAM K. VAN PELT, Wisconsin Missouri WILLIAM S. MAILLIARD, California T. A. THOMPSON, Louisiana THOMAS M. PELLY, Washington FRANK M. CLARK, Pennsylvania MILTON W. GLENN, New Jersey THOMAS L. ASHLEY, Ohio ROBERT F. ELLSWORTH, Kansas JOHN D. DINGELL, Michigan GEORGE A. GOODLING, Pennsylvania L. MENDEL RIVERS, South Carolina STANLEY R. TUPPER, Maine ALTON LENNON, North Carolina CHARLES A. MOSHER, Ohio THOMAS N. DOWNING, Virginia JAMES R. GROVER, JR., New York BOB CASEY, Texas ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Maryland JAMES A. BYRNE, Pennsylvania HASTINGS KEITH, Massachusetts CHARLES A. VANIK, Ohio HARLAN HAGEN, California EDITH GREEN, Oregon PAUL G. ROGERS, Florida FRANK A. STUBBLEFIELD, Kentucky JOHN M. MURPHY, New York JACOB H. GILBERT, New York JOHN M. DREWRy, Chief Counsel BERNARD J. ZINCKE, Counsel NED P. EVERETT, Assistant Counsel WILLIAM B. WINFIELD, Chief Clerk PAUL S, BAauER, Consultant SUBCOMMITTEE ON OCEANOGRAPHY ALTON LENNON, North Carolina, Chairman JOHN D. DINGELL, Michigan THOMAS M. PELLY, Washington BOB CASEY, Texas ROBERT F. ELLSWORTH, Kansas CHARLES A. VANIK, Ohio STANLEY R. TUPPER, Maine EDITH GREEN, Oregon CHARLES A. MOSHER, Ohio PAUL G. ROGERS, Florida HASTINGS KEITH, Massachusetts. JACOB H. GILBERT, New York II CONTENTS Hearings held on— June 23, 1964 June 24, 1964 June 25, 1964 June 30, 1964 Statement of — Dubach, Harold W., deputy, National Oceanographic Data Center ___ Hornig, Dr. D. F., Director, Office of Science and Technology, and Chairman, Federal Council of Science and Technology__________- Maxwell, Dr. Arthur E., head, Geophysics Branch of the Office of Naval Research and Chairman of the Interagency Committee on Oceanography Panel on International Programs_______________-- McKernan, Donaid L., Chairman, Interagency Committee on Ocean- ography, Instrumentation, Equipment, and Facilities Panel_______ Nygren, Comdr. Harley D., U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey, Acting Chairman, Ocean Surveys Advisory Panel, Interagency Committee onk@ ceamo sna pins 3 ei Ee PL St ik ee oes ta ae ee Re ee ee Stewart, Dr. Harris B., Jr., Deputy Assistant Director, U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey in the Office of Oceanography_____--______- Treadwell, Capt. T. K., U.S. Navy, Chairman, Ships Panel of the Interagency Committee on Oceanography___________________.==2 Wakelin, Hon. James H., Jr., Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Re- search and Development) and Chairman of the Interagency Com- mittee on Oceanography of the Federal Council of Science and BIRE CHINO] @ Payee et ee re ee ee SP Ss Ry I ER ae ne oe eM Wallen, Dr. I. E., Assistant Director for Oceanography, Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, and Chairman, Research Panel, Interagency Committee on Oceanography Additional information supplied by— Commerce Department— Chronological background of operations research study of ocean SURE VS ire 9 eatee i a ae Me ashe OC FS ee SN ke Cost of ORI contract, memo from H. B. Stewart, Jr., to chief, pro- gram planning staff Investigation of geophysical data holdings_______.____.______- Operations Research, Inc., biographies of consultants attached to_ Systems cevelopmeny division, chart listing personnel dated April USS 2) a mE OT sa Oe TPS OA OAS OTE ES aS Tre Ocean Science News article dated June 11, 1964, re retirement of DECTE LATE CELUI PgR Vy muy TUE are, Sle eee ON MM a Sek eRe IB eel Stewart, Dr. Harris B., Jr.— Panikkar, N. K., director, Indian Ocean Expedition of India, letter dated May 31, 1964 Shepard, Frances P., professor of submarine geology, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, letter dated May 18, 1964_____- Steele, S. B., acting public affairs officer, U.S. Information Service, letrerdated Mai, 21pel064 «tncs Ol eetere Bea hs Se re at Wijesekera, R. O. B., Ceylon Association for the Advancement of Delencerlester dated May 22) 19G45 5 ees eae ee ye Frances E., American Ambassador, letter dated June 8, Yang, Theresa, letter dated March 15, 1964 Treadwell, Capt. T. K.— Operation of oceanograpgic vessels, tables________________--_- Shipping and geophysical companies approached by the Navy Oceanographic Office re ocean surveys 109 109 114 111 110 22 151 152 151 152 150 153 130 128 IV CONTENTS Additional information supplied by—Continued Wakelin, Hon. James H., Jr.— Agencies participating in the national oceanographic program, Chante aS eee ene Lo ee ee Balance of oceanographic research effort in the United States__-_ Highlights of ICO and panel meetings, calendar year 1963 ICO contracts with private institutions, table______-______.___ Interagency Committee on Oceanography advisory panels, chart__ Interagency Committee on Oceanography, chart_______________ Legislative bodies applicable to ICO member agencies’ oceanog- raphy~procrams wtold-im tables 2-2 = eee Facing Oceanographic ships at private institutions, table________-/_____ Past and present status of security classification of oceanic SOU Glial oS eee Re ee Wallen, Dr. I. E.— Geochronology of Marine and Fluvial Sediments, from Science magazine, June 19, 1964, by Elizabeth Rona________________ Scientific background of drilling program as presented in a pro- posal to the National Science Foundation Appendix: Tee aie Wee EE eo OD a ee Material submitted by Dr. J. Herbert Hollomon, Chairman of the Interdepartmental Committee for Atmospheric Sciences of the Federal Council for Science and Technology Relative to Air-Sea Interaction Research Planning. Appendix? enna eee A SO a Se Bibliography of Oceanographic Publications, submitted by Hon. James H. Wakelin, Jr., Assistant Secretary of the Navy. Appendix’ se os am mein ee a ee University Curricula in Oceanography, submitted by Hon. James H. Wakelin, Jr., Assistant Secretary of the Navy. Aopen dix. 4 ssl ee ons oo oo er Aquatic Sciences in the Great Lakes Area, submitted by Hon. James H. Wakelin, Jr., Assistant Secretary of the Navy, and prepared by Robert B. Abel, executive secretary, Interagency Committee on Oceanography, including other documents on same topic. Appendixt hen a ata a eres SL 8 ee eee Oceanography—The 10 Years Ahead, submitted by Hon. James H. Wakelin, Jr., Assistant Secretary of the Navy, including letter of transmittal to Speaker McCormick dated July 26, 1963, and signed by Dr. Jerome B. Wiesner. Appendix: 6) ete ee tS Ea PO re National Oceanographic Program—Fiscal Year 1964, submitted by Hon. James H. Wakelin, Jr., Assistant Secretary of the Navy. Ap DON GER 2/2 ree ree a Se ee es National Oceanographic Program—Fiscal Year 1965, submitted by Hon. James H. Wakelin, Jr., Assistant Secretary of the Navy, in- cluding letter of transmittal dated March 19, 1964, addressed to Speaker McCormack and signed by President Johnson. Ap penis = ats ene ee eee ee Annual report of the National Oceanographic Data Center—Fiscal Year 1962, submitted by Mr. Harold W. Dubach, Deputy, NODC. Appendine QE 1@ ae iE ee Ss eee. ke Annual Report of the National Oceanographic Data Center—Fiscal Year 1963, submitted by Mr. Harold W. Dubach, Deputy, NODC. “Appendix O20 Os Tees eee Se vet. Se ON oN rr ee U.S: Oceanography—A Bold New Venture, article appearing in the Explorers Journal, December 1963, by Dr. Harris B. Stewart, Jr., Deputy Assistant Director, U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey, in the Office of Oceanography. Noyoeiacubs We ho oe SE = eae Man and the Sea, by Joel W. Hedgpeth, a series of lectures delivered over KPFA, Berkeley, Calif., April 7-13, 1964. Page 689 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 TUESDAY, JUNE 23, 1964 Houst or REPRESENTATIVES, COMMITTEE ON MercHANT Marine AND FISHERIES, SUBCOMMITTEE ON OCEANOGRAPHY, Washington, D.C. The subcommittee met at 10:15 a.m., pursuant to call, in room 219, Cannon House Office Building, Hon. Alton Lennon (chairman of the subcommittee) presiding. Mr. Lennon. Pursuant to notice given to the members of the Sub- committee on Oceanography, the subcommittee is convened. I would like to make this short opening statement for the record and for the benefit of our distinguished guests here this morning. The purpose of these hearings is to examine the national oceano- graphic program for fiscal year 1965, which was transmitted to the Speaker of the House on March 19, 1964, by the President. Copies of this program have been distributed to the members of the Subcom- mittee on Oceanography. (See app. 7, p. 567.) This year, the administration has presented the oceanographic pro- gram with a horizontal budget structure. This enables the Congress to examine the program as a complete entity rather than attempting to analyze the vertical budgets of the many different agencies involved in the study of the marine sciences. It 1s the procedure called for in the bill which originated in this committee, H.R. 6997. The legislation has passed the House and now reposes in the Senate. We are indeed fortunate to have as our first witness Dr. D. F. Hor- nig who is the Director of the Office of Science and Technology and is Chairman of the Federal Council of Science and Technology. Dr. Hornig, in addition to these duties, is Science Adviser to the Presi- dent. He will be followed by Dr. James H. Wakelin, Jr., Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research and Development, who is also Chairman of the Interagency Committee on Oceanography. Other witnesses involved in the functional planning of the fiscal 1965 oceanograhic program will follow. Dr. Hornig, this is a great honor and a pleasure to this committee to have you here with us today and we look forward to your testimony and with a much closer relationship than we have had the privilege of enjoying in the past. I ask you, sir, do you have other members of the ICO with you here, and I do not believe there are but two chairs to your right or left, so I suppose you would want them to sit where they are. Dr. Hornic. Dr. Wakelin, of course, is Chairman of the ICO and we have a number of members of the ICO. 1) 9 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Mr. Lennon. Yes, sir; the members of the committee have been furnished with a witness list and the subject for discussion that you were gracious enough to furnish the committee some several days ago. oie Hornic. I also have with me Dr. Wenk, who is Executive Sec- retary of the Federal Council for Science and Technology and a mem- ber of my staff. Mr. Lennon. You have a prepared statement, I believe, sir, which has been furnished to members of the subcommittee, and if you will just proceed we will be delighted to hear from you, sir. STATEMENT OF DR. D. F. HORNIG, DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, AND CHAIRMAN, FEDERAL COUNCIL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Dr. Hornig. Mr. Chairman and members of the committee, I appre- ciate this opportunity to appear before your Subcommittee on Ocean- ography to discuss the relationship of this field to our national wel- fare. ‘This is the first occasion on which the Director of the Office of Science and Technology has been able to discuss with you the oceanographic program and the manner in which the program is developed and administered. I especially welcome your invitation to develop a series of presenta- tions from the executive branch that will describe how the oceano- graphic research activities of some 20 bureaus are brought together in reasonably coherent fashion. All of these activities are carried on by the separate departments and independent agencies that have statutory missions related to the sea. As a consequence, the program has been primarily described to the Congress on an agency-by-agency basis. I believe, however, that it is vital that appropriate congres- sional committees examine the scope of such interagency programs in terms of the aggregate goals and the total national effort to achieve them. I recall that it was your subcommittee that took mitiative to examine the potential of oceanography to contribute to the Nation’s needs very soon after publication of the National Academy of Sciences proposals for a 10-year program of Federal support to strengthen this enterprise. H.R. 6997, which was reported out by your committee and passed the House of Representatives last year, would identify ocean- ography as a field deserving of a congressional policy action. In calling for the development of a comprehensive, long-range plan and coordination in oceanography, this bill gained the support of my predecessor, Jerome B. Wiesner, in his letter to Chairman Bonner last June. This legislation has not yet been acted on. I should like to lend my support to its enactment, for I believe that it will help us better to achieve a coordinated, comprehensive, and effective national program in oceanography. OCEANOGRAPHY AND ITS CONTRIBUTION TO NATIONAL GOALS Before discussing further the Federal oceanography program, I should like to describe what we mean by oceanography and how this field of science is relevant to practical matters of importance to the Nation. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 S . The ocean covers more than 70 percent of the surface of the earth; for the most part it is the common property of the nations of the world and the common resource of the technologically advanced nations. Slow accumulation of observations made by explorers, and recently oceanographers, has given us a useful general picture of the ocean, but one inexact and almost totally lacking in detail. We know quite a lot about the gulf stream, the warm northward moving river which les off our east coast and which carries heat and life to the countries of northwest Europe. This region has been more intensively studied than any other in the world’s ocean, but we have only recently learned that there lies below the gulf stream another stream flowing with less speed in the opposite direction. We know that spectacular variations or meanders occur in the gulf stream, but why this is so or what consequences result we do not know. The sea sustains plant and animal life in great abundance; we have identified many of the forms of life which reside near the ocean surface, although much more is to be learned; but we know very little about the living population at great depths. We recognize that there is a truly enormous potential food supply available in the ocean; but we are properly cautious about its management and exploitation, be- cause we have so far learned so little about the food chains which lead through various forms of life from plankton to the edible fish. Recent advances in technology have given us new instruments with which to study the ocean floor and the layers of sediment which reveal much about the history of the earth. These include acoustic refrac- tion techniques, gravity meters of high precision, sensitive magnetom- eters, precision depth recorders, deep-coring facilities, and ocean bottom photography. We look forward to fascinating and important discoveries relating to the structure and history of the ocean floor, but the extent of the ocean is so great and the skill required in the use of these instruments so great that many mysteries will remain hidden for a long time. The effects of the atmosphere on the ocean and of the ocean on the atmosphere are both obvious and subtle, catastrophic, and gentle. Fort short time periods these effects may be studied independently ; but for longer periods the ocean and the atmosphere must be consid- ered to be a single system. For example, a warm ocean gives up heat to the atmosphere with the consequence that winds are created ; the winds create waves and spray, and the resulting mixing and evap- oration cools the ocean. Further chains of events can be traced, but we must recognize that we don’t know much in a quantitative sense about these processes. Here lie some of the critical difficulties in weather prediction for periods of weeks or months. To make sub- stantial progress in this area we shall need carefully planned investigations. The solution of the scientific problems which reside in the sea re- quires varied talents. Physicists, chemists, mathematicians, biolo- gists, mechanical and electrical engineers all are needed in oceano- graphic research. Each of the scientific problems I have discussed 1s important to a number of practical problems which, in fact, de- termine the Nation’s interest in oceanography and account for the recent large increases in budgetary support. Without a clear recog- nition of the scientific problems and an honest determination to attack them, we cannot hope to solve the practical problems; and we should 4 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 find it impossible to hold and attract the capable, energetic scientists, engineers, and technicians which the agencies and research labora- tories require. From this discussion of the nature of oceanography, it should be clear that oceanography is not one field but a combination of fields. Classical disciplines and newer interdisciplinary sciences become close- ly coupled because the interests involved all relate to the sea. Insofar as the Federal Government is concerned, the complexity that arises out of the variety of scientific categories is paralleled by the complexity that arises from the variety of practical interests which we have in the sea. The ocean is a military arena which, in an era of undersea warfare and sea-based deterrents, must be understood by the Navy. The Bureau of Commercial Fisheries in carrying out its statutory functions must inventory fish stocks; it must understand the factors which promote their growth and distribution; and it must employ this understanding to improve the effectiveness of the catch. And I might add—to insure that there is a catch and to know where we can find it in the future. i The Bureau of Sports Fisheries and Wildlife has concern for the conservation and utilization of our living resources as they contribute to ocean-related recreation. The Geological Survey and the Bureau of Mines are interested in determining the distribution and richness of mineral resources on or below the ocean floor and the means by which they can be exploited—both on the shallow Continental Shelf in the near future, and in the deeper ocean in the more distant future. The Coast and Geodetic Survey has the important task of charting the oceans, measuring not only bottom topography but also currents, tem- peratures, gravity, and magnetic fields. The Weather Bureau seeks to understand better how the ocean behavior influences weather and climate, and how such scientific information may be employed to im- prove weather prediction and, perhaps a long way off, to modify cli- mate. The Atomic Energy Commission must understand processes within the ocean to determine how it may safely deposit radioactive waste, and the Public Health Service has a corresponding obligation to study adverse effects of pollutants on fish and other marine life, which form part of the human food chain. The Coast Guard is re- sponsible for protecting life and property at sea. It requires an un- derstanding of storm and iceberg hazards. The Coastal Engineering Research Center of the Army Corps of Engineers maintains an in- terest in the damaging effects of waves and weather on our shores and means by which these effects may be corrected or moderated. The Smithsonian Institution and the National Science Foundation have exceedingly vital roles in relation to the broad understandings of the ocean, to help insure that important areas of research are not over- looked as a result of concentration on the individual mission respon- sibilities of the various agencies. Although the State Department maintains no research program of its own, it has a direct interest in the potential of oceanography to contribute to our foreign policy. The phenomena which we are ob- serving are, of courses, global, and international cooperation in scien- tific expeditions has become a well-established medium for the more rapid and effective study of the oceans. Through such scientist-to- NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 5 scientist communication, a small but significant mechanism of in- formal diplomacy fosters world understanding and achievement of our foreign policy aims. Research directed at understanding and exploiting both the ocean and the atmosphere offer the best possible opportunity for practical cooperation among nations and for develop- ing stronger awareness throughout the world that our futures are bound together. In a direct way, U.S. efforts in oceanography con- tribute to the direct benefit of other peoples. The exploitation of the living resources of the sea can help meet protein deficiencies of hun- dreds of millions of people, although I must say that we have moved very slowly in doing so; I hope in this year we will be able to do a little more. The worldwide observation of storms, tsunami, and other devastating acts of nature may help save lives beyond our shores. Because the study of the sea involves many interests and is ap- proached from many points of view, programs are supported by many agencies. As a consequence, mechanisms have had to be developed to coordinate these programs in order that they add up to a single na- tional program and I should like to discuss these mechanisms briefly. PLANNING AND COORDINATION THROUGH THE FEDERAL COUNCIL FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY The Federal Council for Science and Technology was established in March 1959 by Executive Order 10807 to assist the President by (a) providing more effective planning and administration of the Federal program; (0) identifying research needs, including areas requiring additional emphasis; (c) achieving more effective utilization of scien- tific and technical resources and facilities of Federal agencies, in- cluding the elimination of unnecessary duplication; and (d) further- ing international cooperation in science and technology. Functioning somewhat as a science cabinet, the Council includes policy rank officials from the eight departments having major pro- grams in research and development, with observers from Department of State, Federal Aviation Agency, and the Bureau of the Budget. As special assistant to the President I serve on the Federal Council. Following the precedents of Presidents Kisenhower and Kennedy, President Johnson has asked that in that capacity I serve as Chair- man. It is important to recall that the authority and responsibilities of individual departments constitute the dominant basis for the conduct of Federal research and development. Each department with its own special and complex requirements, operating under statutory author- ity from the Congress, must be free to sponsor imaginative and crea- tive research if its programs are not to become sterile. In the field of marine biology, for example, the National Science Foundation and the Smithsonian Institution are concerned with exploring a wide range of fundamental problems and in supporting the training of marine biologists, while the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries seeks to understand the distribution and habits of fish; the Navy investigates the effects of marine organisms on sound propagation, and the Public Health Service tries to assure the quality of the food taken from the sea. In some cases, the interests of the separate agencies overlap, and 6 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 this circumstance has both advantages and disadvantages. However, there is a growing recognition of common interest among the agencies. None of the agencies, for example, are in a position to sponsor all of the fundamental research on which their programs depend. Each, there- fore, draws increasingly on the fruits of research sponsored by sister agencies; each thus contributes to the other. Apart from this com- mon pool of scientific information, each of the agencies must draw on scientific resources, particularly manpower, that cut across organiza- tional lines. In seeking to foster communication and cooperation among the agencies, the Council seeks to obtain greater efficiency and economy for the effort as a whole. These comments apply to not only oceanog- raphy, but to this very general problem of Federal programs which cut across many agencies. In the task of coordination, the close relationship between the Fed- eral Council, the Office of Science and Technology, and the President’s Science Advisory Committee, and their close proximity to the White House, all help greatly in the conversion of plans into actions. Be- cause of policy level agency representation in the Council, actions jointly agreed upon are in most cases implemented effectively and directly. Issues which come before the Council fall generally into three cate- gories: (a) the development of Government-wide plans and programs; (6) problems of Federal management in which we consider efficient utilization of resources and the assurance of program quality; and (c) the development of Government-wide policies relating to non- governmental programs and institutions and to international activi- ties. These issues are developed through studies by the President’s Sci- ence Advisory Committee, the National Academy of Sciences, and the Executive Office of the President. But, by and large, the sharpening of issues, the collection of facts, and the generation of recommenda- tions are carried out through the committee structure of the Council itself. The Council at the present time has committees on oceanography, water resources research, atmospheric sciences, materials research and development, high energy physics, behavioral sciences, natural resources, scientific and technical information, scientific personnel, patent policy, international affairs, and long range planning. The particular case we are talking about today is the coordination of oceanography. GOVERNMENT-WIDE PROGRAMS IN OCEANOGRAPHY It should be clear that all Federal science and technology cannot be coordinated by the Council. In fact, the Council has been highly selec- tive in choosing topics for analysis and continued review. The Coun- cil operates with a minimum of staff, administrative superstructure, and protocol. In a few instances, however, the need for continuing coordination has warranted the development of full-time staffs in the committees themselves, and the Interagency Committee on Oceanog- raphy is one such example. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 7 In turning now to the program in oceanography and the manner in which its development and coordination have been carried out through the Council, I should recall a very brief history. In 1959 a broad study undertaken by the National Academy of Sci- ences at the request of a number of Federal agencies was set forth in a report entitled “Oceanography, 1960-70.” The study recommended doubling of the then annual effort of about $35 million over a period of about 10 years. Senate Resolution 1386 unanimously supported these recommendations to expand oceanography and the first of a series of bills was introduced in both the House and the Senate to strengthen Government-wide planning and coordination. In 1959, soon after its own establishment, the Federal Council appointed an Interagency Committee for Oceanography which has since been the primary mecha- nism for basic program planning. In the spring of 1961, President Kennedy sent a special budget mes- sage to the Congress calling for a step increase In oceanographic fund- ing, partly to accelerate a new ship construction program and training of manpower. That year, too, the Council released its first annual re- port on oceanography setting forth an integrated program and budget. Such a report has been developed and made available to the Congress each year since, and I will subsequently discuss the manner in which these reports are developed in more detail. I think the members of this committee have seen the pink report that the chairman alluded to which analyzes the 1965 program in oceanography. LONG-RANGE PLANS Last summer a long-range, 10-year plan was developed to provide a broad perspective for an effective and expanded scientific study of the sea, set forth in this green report which I believe you have also seen. Research objectives were identified, the relation of these objectives to the national welfare was discussed, and estimates were made of the funds, facilities, and manpower needed for their accomplishment. Reviewed, endorsed, and published by the Federal Council, this plan has served to illuminate the relationship between the agency programs and the general goals. The long-range plan was formally transmitted to the Congress July 26, 1963. The 10-year plan represents the best judgment of Federal officials as to the size and internal priorities of the agencies’ research programs. It is a view of a landscape at one point in time. As our understanding grows and the landscape is seen more clearly, more detailed plans must be made and the previous plans revised. Consequently, one of the first projects that I expect to assign to the ICO next year is the development of a new long-range plan that takes into account the ex- perience we have gained and profits from it. THE FISCAL YEAR 1965 OCEANOGRAPHIC BUDGET PROPOSALS The development of the annual program in oceanography is the specific responsibility of the Interagency Committee on Oceanography, and I shall indicate briefly the steps which the Interagency Committee follows each year in preparing the program. 8 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 The Interagency Committee, incidentally, operates through a series of specialized panels, and the panel chairmen have been invited to appear as subsequent witnesses before your committee. They will be able to tell you how each spring they draw up a set of plans that repre- sent a combination of mission needs and scientific opportunities. These plans are first sifted and reviewed by the ICO and then evaluated both by OST staff and by a panel of outside consultants, convened by the Office of Science and Technology, and representing a variety of subject matter disciplines and institutional experience. They attempt to in- sure that these programs are not “more of the same,” that they reflect fully new opportunities in scientific research, and the full potential of engineering technology. Finally, the ICO proposals, together with the consultants’ critique are submitted to the Council, acting in plenary session. With Coun- cil review and endorsement, the program then adopted serves as a guide, both to the Bureau of the Budget and to individual agencies in the development of budget proposals which are finally reflected im the President’s annual budget message to the Congress. The national oceanographic program for fiscal 1965 was incorporated as special analysis H in the President’s budget message to the Congress. Full details were set forth in the Federal Council report that was trans- mitted by the President to the Congress, that is he pink one, on March 19, 1964. Copies were sent to the committee. The document includes a summary description of the program and its interpretation, and a detailed account of the parts of the program -and its cost. It is important to recognize here that any field of science or any other field of Government activity undergoes an excruciating set of reviews. Tnevitably, the aggregate of budget proposals exceeds the funds avail- able. Choices have to be made, and in this competition for funds justi- fication must be based not only on the importance of the objectives but on the scientific resources available, particularly of skilled manpower, and the quality of the leadership. In his January 21 message on the fiscal 1965 budget, President Johnson enunciated a set of guidelines and principles expressing his determination to keep costs under tight control. It is in this framework that the $138 million oceanographic budget was submitted. The $138 million in this proposal represents an 11-percent increase over the fiscal 1964 appropriations. To sustain momentum in the developing program, the budget was carefully tailored to foster growth in research and training, providing $73 million in this category compared with $64 million last year and some $52 million for fiscal year 1963. To do this, ship construction was accordingly slowed. In transmitting this year’s oceanographic program to the Congress, President Johnson stated— this proposed growth is an absolute minimum if the country is to achieve its objectives in oceanic research which had been previously enunciated by both President Kennedy and the Congress. We are somewhat disappointed to find that some elements of this program, as was the case with the fiscal 1964 oceanography program, have not received support by the Congress and this illustrates a prob- lem which I especially wish to call to this committee’s attention. Dif- ferent parts of the oceanographic budget are considered separately NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 9 by several committees of Congress; in this process the coherence of the program may not be visible to the separate committees, and the integrity of the program may be weakened when some parts of it are cut without regard to the effect on the whole. I believe that this 1s one of the important problems which Congress and the Executive jointly- face in attempting to create and execute wise policy In managing pro- grams which extend through many agencies. : May I note, incidentally, that although the overall growth rate has- been slowed, this level of support more than meets the targets initially set by the National Academy of Sciences in their report of 1958. It is also consistent with the 1960 study conducted by the House Science and Astronautics Committee which indicated that to meet the goals. which the Congress then felt significant, the program over the decade: of the 1960’s should increase by a factor of about 4. In assessing where we stand in oceanography, it is important to’ note that if the Congress acts favorably on the fiscal 1965 prograriz, the Federal Government will have invested $134 million in new ships over the previous 5-year period. For the first time in this Nation’s history we shall have a fleet explicitly designed for oceanographic re- search and surveys. We will also have invested $38 million in new shore facilities. | Most important, in 5 years, the annual support for research will have grown by almost a factor of 3. These funds, to be sure, are not a large fraction of the Federal research and development budget, but their size and rate of growth must be measured in terms of the exceedingly small nucleus of activity from which this whole enterprise began. The capabilities of Govern- ment, university, and industrial laboratories have so increased that the world leadership which the United States has demonstrated in many fields of science 1s also sustained in oceanography. Neither dollars nor numbers of ships are the proper yardstick of progress, however, rather, what matters are the scientific and en- gineering accomplishments in the oceans, but I will leave description of some of the exciting new discoveries and prospects resulting from this research to the panel chairmen of the ICO. I know also that the Congress is interested in the quality of its management. I believe that the efforts of the Federal Council and the ICO to plan wisely, to develop balance of support between fields, to assess the relative emphasis to be given research, ships, and manpower, and to take steps to minimize duplication of effort, help to insure that the funds which the Congress has appropriated are prudently used. Federal support of science is motivated because in the long or short run, science serves mankind. What will be discovered and how such discoveries will contribute to our national welfare is often unforeseen. I should like to assure this committee of the determination of the ad- ministration to support scientific research and to make as sure as is: possible that we are working with maximum effectiveness on the most important problems. We can then hope to meet new challenges as they arise with confidence and wisdom. Mr. Chairman, I will be glad to answer questions. Mr. Lennon. Thank you, Doctor. Mr. Pelly? 10 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Mr. Prtiy. Well, Mr. Chairman, I do not want to delay hearing the panel members that are going to follow but I would certainly feel re- miss 1f I did not compliment the doctor on his informative report. It is one of the finest bits of testimony that I think I have heard as a member of this committee. Dr. Hornig. Thank you. Mr. Lennon. Mr. Casey? Mr. Cassy. Doctor, does the Interagency Committee on Oceanog- raphy now report to the Federal Council? In other words, is it kind of an advisory committee in the Federal Council ? Dr. Hornic. Yes; the ICO is set up as one committee of the Federal Council; so its reports and recommendations are evaluated by the Federal Council. Mr. Casey. I do not want to take too much time but I wonder if you could maybe clear up the difference between the Federal Council and the Office of Science Technology and the Science Advisory Committee. Are they more or less related? Do you have some of the same mem- bers serving on all three of these committees ? Dr. Horne. I think this may be the best way to put it: All of these functions serve in an advisory capacity to the President. The Office of Science and Technology is the staff office within the Executive Office of the President; the Federal Council is a representative body of the Federal agencies which works with the Office of Science and Technology and provides advice from within Government; the Presi- dent’s Advisory Gonsniitine provides advice from outside of the Gov- ernment. It also works with the Office of Science and Technology, but it produces the outside input. Mr. Casry. That clears it up sufficiently for me. I will not spend any more time on that. I do want to compliment you on your statement and even, though this committee’s bill which the chairman and others of us introduced to show our support has passed the House and as the chairman stated, it reposes in the Senate. I believe that the interest that developed in this bill—we had another bill before as you recall, and had the same luck—in fact, I think the other one was passed and was vetoed. Dr. Horne. Yes. Mr. Casry. That it has stimulated interest in oceanography and I think not only outside of the Government but in the executive branch and I believe we are getting some of the fruits today of the purpose of the bill even though it has never really seen the final signature of the President and actually become part of the law. I want to compliment you and the members of the subcommittee and the others that have worked with this committee on developing a bill that would be compatible to the executive department in setting forth the guidelines and following some of the ideas that have been worked out jointly by some of the committee and the executive de- partment and going ahead with it even though it is not part of the law. I think we are accomplishing something, we really do not need the law if we continue to maintain this type of cooperation. I do believe we need the law for the purpose of informing our colleagues in the Congress of the need for this support and the support of these programs that you people are undertaking. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 11 Dr. Hornig. I think what you have said is very correct. I think we have gradually, through the work of your committee and through the work of the Interagency Committee, built up interest and under- standing in this program. Mr. Casey. We have kind of a public relations job with the rest of the Congress who are not familiar with the work and the horizons that you are opening up in the future of the programs that can be undertaken, and the benefits that will result of contmued effort in this field. I think that is where our problem is. If we can get them awakened to that. You do not ask for as much money as we spend on one pad down at Canaveral. I think the benefits we will reap from this are unlimited. Dr. Hornie. I think the long-range aspects are very great and, of course, we have just begun the buildup. It is really only a few years old, and we are going to have to wait a while for some of the antici- pated benefits. Mr. Casry. You do not need all that money right now, you could not absorb it. I know you could use more money than you are going to get. I think that is typical of most all agencies. I think what we need to do is when someone complains about some oceanography pro- gram, well, they say, this is a tremendous amount of money, why, I think it relates to some of our other scientific programs and the possi- ble results, I do not think this is exorbitant, I do not think it is wasteful. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Lennon. Mr. Ellsworth? Mr. ExiswortsH. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I, too, would like to compliment you, Dr. Hornig, on your very fine statement and I would like to second what Mr. Pelly and others on the subcommittee have said to you. I do not really have any questions but I would like to make a couple of comments on your statement. First of all, with respect to page 7, your comment that the phenom- ena which we are observing are, of course, global, I look forward to hearing later in testimony from some of the men who are going to follow, further comment on that. I think this is one of the real problem areas, critical problem areas. Not only so far as international cooperation is concerned but so far as rights and responsibilities are concerned when it comes to commercial exploitation of the resources of the ocean. So I was glad to have that comment in there and I look for- ward to having further details on some of these areas brought out in later testimony. Then I want to comment also on page 16 where you point out that different parts of the oceanographic budget are considered separately by several committees of Congress and in this process the coherence of the program may not be visible to the separate committees and the integrity of the program may be lost. I think this is a tremendous probiem. It is a problem that the bill which is pending over in the Senate is partly aimed at. It is a problem that Mr. Casey touched on, and I want to express the hope that the Executive Office of the Presi- dent and the whole administration—now that the civil rights debate is over over there—can get behind this bill and urge its early passage by 12 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 the Senate so it can be signed into law by the President and I think that will be helpful. It will not solve the problem but it will be helpful in preserving the integrity of the oceanographic program when it is presented to the Appropriations Committee for funding. Dr. Hornic. I think that is correct. One of the reasons that the Federal Council has produced these reports is so that each of the con- eressional committees in considering its part can have the opportunity to see what the total program looks like. Mr. Exusworrn. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Lennon. Mr. Rogers? Mr. Rocers. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I, too, want to join in saying that your statement has been very helpful to the committee. Tam concerned about the statement you made on page 16, too. Do you foresee that probably as we develop in this field that is going to be necessary, probably to have one overall agency to develop this field or do you foresee just a continuation of the Interagency Committee? Dr. Hornig. I am not sure that I can give you a final answer to that question. This is a problem which comes up in many areas of Govern- ment. I mean that a number of different scientific programs cut through many agencies, and also are considered by many committees of the Congress. It certainly is not true that in each case the answer is to create another agency. I think this is why it is a problem. We approach oceanography from many points of view and, for instance, the Navy has a different attitude toward it than the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries. This is, I think, a healthy state of affairs as well as being a source of this problem we are discussing. I think it would be wrong to generate a mechanism which did not allow the free play of these multiple points of view and multiple reasons for interest. T think that feature ought to be preserved because it is a source of strength. Mr. Rocers. You do not think that could be preserved if you had one agency to administer this program ? Dr. Hornte. 1 think that would depend on how it was set up and administered. I donot have a firm opinion on this. Mr. Rogers. J was thinking, we have the space agency now that handles the majority of the problems there, and I certainly feel that oceanography has the potential of our space program as we develop it and it was my thinking that some of the problems that you have dis- cussed on page 16 probably could be met if we had an overall program more closely coordinated and administered by an agency under the jurisdiction, say, of your Oceanography Committee. Dr. Hornic. I think there is no question that a single agency, either an existing one or a new one reporting to the President, could meet this problem better. The question is whether one would not end up overdoing it and weaken some of the ties of scientific research to the practical problems which would stay outside of it. That is, there would be a new and difficult problem to relate the research effort to the practical problems associated with missions necessarily retained by the agencies? Mr. Rocers. Let me ask you now, your Interagency Committee, they make a recommendation as to what should be done in this field to your Federal Council? How is this determined? Are there so many NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 13 votes that each department has, or how does this agency come to make these decisions to recommend to you and then how do you decide it? Dr. Hornig. I will leave it to Dr. Wakelin to discuss the operation of the Interagency Committee itself. Mr. Rogers. All right, the Federal Council. Dr. Hornie. The Federal Council is a small body and operates in- formally, by consensus rather than by formal votes. Mr. Roczrs. What do you mean by consensus? You mean there is no way—suppose there is a disagreement? You mean no one ever disagrees ? Dr. Hornic. This would be an unusual body if that were so. Mr. Roerrs. I would think so. Dr. Hornie. I think the situation with regard to oceanography is that the Interagency Committee on Oceanography is a strong com- mittee. The Federal Council presumes that the major technical dis- putes over program details are resolved. Mr. Rogers. You would pretty much go along with the recom- mendation ? Dr. Hornic. Thatisright. Normally there is Mr. Rocrrs. Unless there is some overriding reason ? Dr. Hornte. That is right. Mr. Rocers. Have you ever turned down, since you have been here, recommendations that you can recall, just ‘to give us an example? Dr. Horna. I will leave this to Mr. Wakelin. I have been here only since February and have not, in fact, been through this debate on this particular program yet. Mr. Rocrrs. You have no votes, then, within the Federal Council, if there were a disagreement ? Dr. Hornic. In my experience we have never had to have votes. We have made recommendations where there were dissenting mem- bers, yes, but—— Mr. Rogsrs. What is the outcome in that situation ? Dr. Hornic. Since the Federal Council is basically an advisory committee to the Chief Executive, dissents on program scope or bal- ance are noted, and this then must be debated and resolved when the President’s budget is put together. Mr. Rocrers. Noted to whom? In other words, I am trying to de- termine who makes these decisions. Would this fall upon you as director to make the decision if there is any disagreement within your council ? Dr. Hornic. Yes, I and the Bureau of the Budget. make recom- mendations to the President. Mr. Rocers. Within the budgetary limitations? Dr. Hornic. Yes. : Mr. Rocrers. Who in the Bureau of the Budget? Do you have a representative that is an observer or a member of your Council? Dr. Hornte. No one person; my entire office works closely with the Bureau of the Budget. Mr. Rocrrs. You have no one specific person to work with in the Budget ? Dr. Hornie. No; not in general. Mr. Roerrs. Well, how do they keep informed? Do they have an observer with you ? 35—377— 64—_—_ 2 14 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Dr. Hornic. My staff and Mr. Gordon’s staff are in very close con- tact. Weare at opposite ends of the same corridor. Mr. Rogers. Do they attend your Council meetings? I know in one—I guess on the Interagency Committee they do have an observer. Dr. Hornic. The Bureau of the Budget has an observer present at the Federal Council meetings. Mr. Rocezrs. Staats is the observer? I believe you have him listed here for the Federal Council. Dr. Horne. Yes. Mr. Rogers. Does he generally attend himself or have a representa- tive go in his place? Dr. Hornie. No, he is usually there himself. Mr. Rocers. So that there is close liaison between the two? Dr. Horniae. Yes. Mr. Rocrers. And you would say then the real decisions are made by Staats and by you if there is a disagreement within the Council? Dr. Hornig. Major controversies between agencies are settled by the President. But I would like to emphasize the essential role of the ICO. Normally there is a discussion process in which we try to resolve most of these issues at as early a stage as possible, and leave only major budget issues for final budgetary discussions. Mr. Rogers. I understand that. But I would think the very critical problems would be those which come to the Council where there is some major disagreement which would have to be resolved and I was interested to know who in the final analysis would resolve these differences. As I understand your testimony, it 1s after general dis- cussion with the Council, no specific vote would be taken but any disagreements would be noted, but it would be resolved by you in conjunction with conferring with the Bureau of the Budget. Would this be correct? Dr. Hornic. That is essentially correct. I do want to note histori- cally this is a correct statement. In fact, this careful review mecha- nism the ICO has adopted, including calling in the outside consultants by OST and making their advice available to ICO has produced a situation where I am not aware of the Federal Council’s having over- ruled the ICO any time in the recent past. Mr. Rocers. Now, in your advisory council. Who appoints that advisory council outside of the Government ? Dr. Hornic. That is appointed by me, or my office, but with con- sultation of ICO. Mr. Rocerrs. Is this rotated ? Dr. Hornic. Each year we appoint an ad hoc committee. Mr. Rocrrs. An ad hoc committee ? Dr. Hornic. Yes. Mr. Rocrers. People who are in the business or from what—— Dr. Hornic. We try to make it a representative group of able people in the field who can look at the ICO program and ask hard questions if there are questions to be asked. The responsibility, of course, has to remain within the Government. Mr. Rogers. I understand. Now, do you have a certain term of years or is it just a 1-year term that you appoint these people to ? NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 1 Dr. Hornic. Normally this committee is just called together for limited periodsin August and April. Mr. Rocrrs. Yes, I understand. I know you are new and you should feel free to ask any of your aids. I am going to conclude in just 1 minute, Mr. Chairman. So, your advisory committee perhaps meets once a year, the ad hoc committee ? Dr. Hornic. That is right. Mr. Rogers. How often does your Federal Council meet? Dr. Hornic. Well, the Federal Council meets once or twice a month. Mr. Rocrrs. Once or twice a month. And do you have actual par- ticipation by the people listed here in your book on national oceano- graphic program, fiscal year 1964, I believe you have listed them, or do they have representatives? Dr. Hornic. For the most part they attend. It depends on the seriousness of the issues that are coming up at any given meeting. Mr. Rogers. I wondered what participation you get ? Dr. Hornic. All of these members attend at least a considerable part of the meetings of the Federal Council. Mr. Rogers. Does this take a full day’s time, would you say ? Dr. Hornic. No, the Federal Council normally meets for about 3 hours. Mr. Rocrrs. And you review these programs and recommendations made to you by the various committees ? Dr. Hornic. That is right. Mr. Rorers. And then you act after you have heard your advisory ad hoc group, or do you wait for their advice before taking any action, or how is that cordinated with your decisions? Dr. Horntc. Well, in this case the program is not normally pre- sented to the Federal Council until after the ICO has compared notes with the outside advisory group and taken its reactions into account. The Federal Council sees both the original proposals from ICO and the extensive critique prepared by the outside panel. Mr. Rocsrs. Does the cutside panel report directly to you or is it just a, coordinated report with the ICO? Dr. Hornic. The panel reports to me, but results are usually dis- cussed first with the ICO. It is not a question of deciding whether someone is right or wrong; the objective is to develop the best possible program. The consultants make their criticisms and remedies avail- able by discussion with the ICO. Mr. Rogers. And you say, of course, we can disscuss with Mr. Wake- lin how they determine priorities within the ICO, which are generally accepted by the Federal Council ? Dr. Hornic. That is correct. Mr. Rocrrs. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Lennon. Thank you, Mr. Rogers. Mr. Tupper has left, Mr. Mosher ? Mr. Mosurr. Mr. Chairman, of the many very interesting, impor- tant, and significant comments that Dr. Hornig has made in his state- ment, my special attention is called to this sentence on page 7: Research directed at understanding and exploiting the ocean and the atmos- phere offer the best possible opportunity for practical cooperation among nations and for developing stronger awareness throughout the world that our futures are bound together. 16 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Dr. Hornig, in the previous sentence you refer to the informal ar- rangements, scientist-to-scientist communication which fosters this opportunity. Are there available also more formal arrangements? Is there any international formal machinery by which this remarkable opportunity might be exploited further ? Dr. Hornic. Well, there are a variety of arrangements. There is a joint Indian Ocean Expedition, for example, which has been going on for 38 years; there is a tropical Atlantic survey which is a multi- nation survey; UNESCO has an International Oceanographic Com- mission which fosters cooperation in this area. Mr. Mosuer. Do you feel that this country is taking the initiative and leadership to the greatest extent possible to encourage this type of mechanism ? Dr. Hornie. I think we have done quite well. We continue to look for newer and better ways to help both ourselves and others by pooling efforts. When you say “the greatest possible,” these are strong words. Mr. Mosuer. Yes. Dr. Hornie. I think we can always do better than we are doing. Mr. Mosuer. Well, in general, do we get a cooperative response? Just to be specific, for instance, what about the Russians, our greatest rivals in many world activities; are there cooperative arrangements in these areas with the Russians ? Dr. Hornic. The answer is “Yes”; and I think this has been a fairly model area, as many of the geophysical sciences have been. The Rus- sians have participated in the Indian Ocean Expedition, they have had research vessels in the Indian Ocean. J think some of the people—you might return to this question—some of the people who are working more closely and immediately in oceanography can be more specific than I have been. To the best of my knowledge they have participated actively and willingly in these international arrangements. Mr. Mosner. And this legislation that reposes in the Senate, al- though it is not directed immediately to this international activity, it would lay a better basis, would it not, for our participation in it? Dr. Hornie. I think so. Mr. Mosuer. That is all, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Lennon. Thank you, Mr. Mosher. Mr. Gilbert ? Mr. Gitpert. I have no questions, Mr. Chairman. I merely wish to thank the doctor for his testimony and his presentation before the committee this morning. Mr. Lennon. Thank you, Mr. Gilbert. Mr. Keith? Mr. Kerrn. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. On page 17 you make reference to the capabilities of Government, university, and industrial laboratories. I represent the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute. I wondered what category that would fit into or do you need a fourth category ? Dr. Hornte. I think this will be most clearly resolved by adding the words “independent research organization.” JI think in my mind I lumped them with universities when I wrote the sentence in question. Mr. Ketru. Thank you. NATIONAL OCHANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 17 On page 16 you amended your text to read, at the third line from the bottom, “The Federal Government will have invested $134 million in new ships over,” and you inserted, ‘“‘the previous 5-year period.” Dr. Hornic. I do not think that differs from my prepared testi- mony. By the “5-year period,” I mean through this year. Mr. Ketru. I was just wondering if there was an extraordinary de- velopment in the previous 5-year period over the preceding 5 years? Dr. Hornic. Oh, yes. At the time of the National Academy study in 1959, we were really very deficient in the number and quality of ships we had available and this fact was widely publicized. Now, m these last few years, we have really built up a fleet of specialized oceanographic vessels. So our capabilities—that is what this ivest- ment represents—have been very considerably expanded. Mr. Kerru. Are we relatively in a better position vis-a-vis the Rus- sian effort than we were 5 years ago, or have their efforts paralleled ours ? Dr. Hornic. I think 5 years ago there were really very much better off than we. They had built a number of fairly large, specifically designed oceanographic vessels, and my impression is, and this can be checked by other witnesses, that we have gone a long way toward closing that gap. Mr. Kerra. Thank you. On the top line of that same page, 16, you say, following from the previous page— We are somewhat disappointed to find that some elements of this program, as was the case with fiscal year 1964 oceanography programs, have not received support by the Congress— et cetera. Will these areas or these elements be specifically developed by successive witnesses or do you want to comment briefly on what ele- ments you have in mind ? Dr. Hornic. I hope they will be since the other witnesses represent the various areas in the program specifically. T havea table, just one moment. Mr. Lennon. Will the gentleman yield to me at that point ? I would think that the respective representatives from the several agencies on the ICO would be in a better position to say what success they had with their respective subcommittees on appropriations in these categories and perhaps directed it. Mr. Kerra. It does not make any difference to me who comments on the question, but in view of the fact he states some elements of the pro- gram have not received support from the Congress Mr. Lennon. I was saying some of the representatives of the ICO who in turn appeared before the various appropriations subecommit- tees could say how successful they were in obtaining the funds for their overall program for oceanography. I think they could. I would hope they can. That would be one of their responsibilities, in my judement, at least. Dr. Hornte. Perhaps we can leave it that way. I assume they will, but I will see that this committee gets a detailed statement. Mr. Kerra. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Lennon. Doctor, this subcommittee had a very pleasant rela- tionship with your predecessor during the previous 5 years that Dr. Wiesner served. I give him credit to a considerable degree for the 18 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 informal conferences that this committee had with him in our efforts to work out a bill that would be acceptable to the Congress or at least to the House as it later developed, and to the executive branch of the Government. Now, I note on the second page of your statement that you, as the Chairman of the Federal Council for Science and Technology, and Director of the Office of Science and Technology, support the bill H.R. 6997 that passed the House last year and is now reposing in the Senate. More particularly in the Committee on Commerce of the Senate. Is that support shared by the other members of the Federal Council for Science and Technology ? Dr. Hornic. Yes, so far as I know. I cannot speak for all the in- dividuals, but as a body the answer is “Yes.” Mr. Lennon. May I ask what you as the Director of the Office of Science and Technology and as Chairman, as an individual of the Federal Council for Sees and Technology, have so far done to indicate to the Senate Committee on Commerce your unqualified sup- port of the legislation that was approved by your predecessor and I might say approved by the Bureau of the Budget and at that time approved by the then President of the United States? Dr. Hornic. Well, I have engaged in verbal discussion; I am not sure whether we have communicated anything in writing or not before I was appointed in January. Mr. Lennon. Would it be appropriate, inasmuch as you have so stated for the record your feeling with respect to the legislation, te consider the propriety of asking the Federal Council to, by resolution or by communication to the distinguished gentleman from Washing- ton, Senator Magnuson, your views with respect to this legislation ? The gentleman from Washington has indicated to me early this year, and here it is now late June, that they wanted to have some hearings from some of the interested parties in the Great Lakes area. I think it would be helpful if you think this legislation is wise and is objective and the goal we are all seeking, I think it would be most helpful. Ordinarily, I think it is your duty if you have a feeling of confidence in the legislation to ask the Council to express in writing to the mem- bers of the Commerce Committee of the Senate, your support of the legislation. Let us either abandon any idea of getting the bill passed and have them say they will not support it, or get something meaningful from them rather than continue to pass the buck. Let me turn—and I cannot pursue it, Mr. Keith, because I asked you not to pursue it, because I felt that the members of the ICO respective agencies could better explain their difficulties with respect to obtain- ing what they hoped from the budget. I think all of us understand what you mean when you say on pages 15 and 16 that you are disappointed that some elements of the program have not received support by the Congress, and this illustrates a prob- lem which I especially wish to call to this committee’s attention. I was thinking in that instance that if the particular person on the ICO representing, say, the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries, or repre- senting the Department of the Interior, would appear with the agency—the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries or the Bureau of Sport Fisheries—before the subcommittee that is considering their part of NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 19 the budget and be prepared to state to that subcommittee the effect of the failure of that appropriate Subcommittee on Appropriations to give the consideration to the particular part of the budget that the Department of Interior was asking for. Do you see what I am driving at? Dr. Hornie. I certainly do. 3 Mr. Lennon. In other words, what is the ICO committee for if it cannot be of assistance to the various agencies they represent on the ICO when they go to the particular Subcommittee on Appropriations 4 Then we would hope to obtain a situation different from what you have indicated that does develop here, because it is a fact, we know it, that your Subcommittee on Appropriations, when they mark up a bill and send it to the full committee, that is that. And unless the Sub- committee on Appropriations gets the total picture of the oceano- graphic program as related to that particular facet of the oceano- graphic budget, that is the end of it, because there is nothing done about it in the full committee. I think we will all admit that. Dr. Hornic. I think Secretary Wakelin may be able to comment further on that, too. Mr. Lennon. Weare looking forward to his testimony. We have with us, Doctor—and we do appreciate this very helpful information you have given this committee—our technical consultant to this committee, Mr. Paul Bauer, who has followed this program continuously since the midfifties, so to speak. Mr. Bauer, do you have any questions you would like to ask Dr. Hornig at this time ? Mr. Bauer. Thank you, Mr.Chairman. I havea few. As I read your testimony so far this morninig, Dr. Hornig, you seem to indicate that the hydrosphere and the atmosphere are indi- visible parts of the study of the same unit, to wit, the ocean. Is that correct ? Dr. Hornic. That is right; they are closely related. Captain Baur. If that is the case, why is there a duplication of ICO by the Interdepartmental Coordinating Committee on Atmos- pheric Sciences? It seems to me that would be logically a question of a subcommittee of the Interdepartmental Committee on Oceanography if we mean by a study of the ocean that we must, of course, at the same time study the atmosphere, because without the winds we would have no wind driven currents, we would have no Gulf Stream, and so on. me viy do we have two agencies talking essentially about the same MING ¢ Dr. Hornic. I think the answer here is real easy. The ocean is very big and the atmosphere is very big, and I think there are strong mteractions between them. But there are many problems of the at- mosphere that do not involve the ocean; there are many problems of the ocean which, while they may be subtly connected with the at- mosphere, do not have any primary involvement with the atmosphere. As with many topics, it is convenient to deal with them as separate convenient or logical parts. ‘This does then involve us in the problem, as the Academy pointed out, that the area of air-sea interaction was a neglected area as a consequence of separate specialized treatment. I think we are now trying to do something about that, but I think the separation is basically correct since they are each very large units; they 20 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 are about as big as we can handle one at a time. I think that Secre- tary Wakelin would concur with me on this, that it is a convenient means, both administratively and scientifically, of organizing science. Mr. Bauer. Consider the air-sea interface, who would consider that, the [CO or ICAS? The problem of the air-sea interface ? Dr. Hornic. Both. In addition, there was delegated to the De- partment of Commerce a responsibility to focus attention on this inter- action area that had been neglected, and to do this in consultation with both the ICO and the Interdepartmental Committee on Atmospheric Sciences, ICAS. Mr. Baurr. I notice in your budget breakdown on pages 19, 20, and 21 of the fiscal year report, that you have allocated $208,000 to the Weather Bureau; $25,000 to the Coast and Geodetic Survey, and this is all for air-sea interface problems; $998,000 to the Bureau of the Commercial Fisheries; $60,000 to the Coast Guard; $2,734,000 to the Office of Naval Research ; $856,000 to the Navy’s Office of Ocean- ography ; $500,000 to the Navy’s Bureau of Ships; $200,000 to the U.S. Army ; and $300,000 to the National Science Foundation. Recapping the situation it puts Commerce in at $233,000; Interior $998,000; the Navy $499,000; the Army $200,000; the National Science Foundation $300,000; and the Treasury Department $60,000. Why was the Department of Commerce picked to head up this pro- gram with the apparent appropriations as shown on pages 19, 20, and 21 of your report? In other words, the Navy, it seems to me, has the largest appropriation for the study of air-sea interface, even the Interior Department has more than the Department of Commerce. How did the Department of Commerce get in the picture ? Dr. Hornic. On scientific problems one cannot say that leadership must necessarily follow dollars. One looks to where one has a group of able people that have authority to fit into the Government-wide organization. This was discussed by all the agencies through both ICO and ICAS committee structure. I think it is perfectly true that the leadership might have been centered in a number of places but it had to be centered somewhere. The competence existed in Com- merce; the other agencies were agreeable, and this was where it was settled. Mr. Bauer. Who is most concerned with the problems of the air-sea interface, the Navy or the Department of Commerce? Dr. Hornig. I think there is plainly a concern on both sides. I thing that the Navy has very large responsibilities and perhaps on this score scientifically—no, I do not think I would be willing to draw any distinctions—I would rather say that the Navy has important interests, the Department of Commerce, which is primarily the Weather Bureau in this case, has interests, too; and on an interaction problem it was generally decided, by consensus largely, that this was a good place to put it. I would not be willing to get into a debate as to which of the two might more appropriately have done it. Mr. Bauer. I was not trying to create a debate, sir. It seems to me that with the ASWEPS program, for example, it is vital for the Navy to know all it can about the air-sea interface, and also the ques- tion of forecasting of preferred ship routing and wave structure. Dr. Hornie. There is nothing in this interaction program which discourages the Navy or anyone else from exerting a maximum pos- NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 2 sible effort in the region of air-sea interaction. The sense in which it was delegated to Commerce was that they are to keep track of what everyone does, help coordinate these efforts, and full gaps in programs left unfilled by other agencies. I should also add that as regards these budgetary figures you men- tioned, what is not written down here are components of the atmospheric sciences budget that also contribute to the interaction program. The Department of Commerce has a coordinating and plan- ning role. The Navy has a vigorous program and is certainly en- couraged to carry on a vigorous program. (Documentation of the above subject may be found in app. 1, p. 155.) Mr. Baver. Thank you, sir. There is one further situation that occurs to me. This program that you have talked about is the nonclassified pro- gram of oceanography ; is that correct? Dr. Hornie. That is correct. Mr. Bauer. How much is the classified program in round figures? Dr. Hornig. There is a very substantial classified program but I think I would like to defer to Secretary Wakelin when he is before ou. Mr. Bavrer. What I am getting at is, Do you have the classified pro- gram of oceanography come within the cognizance of the ICO and the Federal Council as the total program ? Dr. Horntic. In general, not within the cognizance of ICO. Mr. Bauer. In other words, it is only a part of the total national oceanographic program which is considered by the ICO ? Dr. Hornie. That is correct. Mr. Baver. Are there any parts of the classified program that will benefit the unclassified program ? Dr. Hornic. The answer to that is “Yes,” and I think again Secre- tary Wakelin can elaborate a little. Mr. Baver. For the record I would like to point out that the classi- fied fiscal 1965 program was $386.5 million, and the unclassified pro- gram is about one-third of that. Now, there is one other consideration I think the committee would like to have cleared up, and that is when we talk about the unclassified oceanographic program, how much of this program existed before by the line functions of, say, the Department of Interior, Bureau of Com- mercial Fisheries, the Hydrographic Office of the Navy, that is now in the oceanographic program? In other words, are these figures able to show us the growth or lack of growth of the program since the Na- tional Academy of Sciences report ? Dr. Hornic. I think these figures give a reasonably good represen- tation. There was some redefinition. Surveys, which had not been included previously in oceanography, were included in later defini- tions of scope; this changed the figures a little, but I think the figures for the last few years give a reasonably accurate representation. Mr. Bauer. Now, one further question and I shall conclude. In the national oceanographic program have you taken account in any way of the capabilities of industry? I am referring particularly to the geophysical industry. In other words, as a nation, our pro- gram, it seems to me, should include the capabilities of the geophysical industry and other industries that have to do with the marine sciences. 22 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Dr. Hornig. Certainly in the development of instrumentation the answer is yes. Industry does, of course, carry on geophysical explora- tions outside of the Federal sponsorship. I think Secretary Wakelin again will come back to the question of undersea engineering or ocean bottom exploration where I do not think we have done as much as we ought to. I think there is a big role for industry in this essentially engineering enterprise. Mr, Bauer. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Lennon. Thank you, Doctor. Now, will Assistant Secretary of the Navy, Mr. James Wakelin, Jr., who is the Chairman of the Interagency Committee on Oceanog- raphy and I believe, sir, you and Dr. Hornig are accompanied today by Dr. H. J. Carlson, a member of the ICO, representing the National Science Foundation; Asst. Surg. Gen. Harry G. Hanson, representing the Public Health Service of the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare; Rear Adm. H. A. Karo of the U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey of the U.S. Department of Commerce; Mr. D. L. McKernan, Bureau of Commercial Fisheries in the Department of Interior; Dr. R. Rollefson, who represents the State Department; R. B. Abel, execu- tive secretary, ICO; and Rear Adm. W. D. Shields, also a member of the Committee on Oceanography; are you representing the Coast Guard, Admiral Shields? Admiral Sutexps. Yes, Mr. Lennon. Of course, I recognize you now. Dr. I. E. Wallen, the Smithsonion Institution, and Dr. J. N. Wolfe of the Atomic Energy Commission. Mr. Secretary, we are old friends. We are delighted to have you here. This will be perhaps your last appearance before this commit- tee and to underscore my feelings we express our regret at Washing- ton losing you, I would like to ask unanimous consent to include in the record at this point a tribute paid to Dr. Wakelin by the Ocean Science News, volume 6, No. 15, at the second paragraph, and I will ask one of the clerks if he will hand it to the lady and ask unanimous consent to include it in the record at this point. I think it is a tribute tothe gentleman. You have done a fine job. (The document mentioned follows :) [From the Ocean Science News, June 11, 1964] Assistant Secretary of the Navy (R. & D.) Dr. James H. Wakelin, Jr., has resigned for personal reasons and will leave his post probably around the middle of July—depending on just when the Senate gets around to confirming his suec- eessor. This highly important post will be taken over by Dr. Robert W. Morse, dean of the college, Brown University, Providence, R.I. Dr. Morse, a physicist (ultrasonics, low temperature and solid state physics), has served as a con- sultant to the Navy on ASW and underwater acoustics, and is president-elect of the Acoustical Society of America. He’s 43; married; three children. Ocean Science News wishes to take this opportunity to express its regret that the Navy and oceanography will shortly lose a proponent in official Washington as strong, intelligent and as effective as Dr. Wakelin has been. As Chairman of the Interagency Committee on Oceanography he has guided this unique organization to a high degree of effectiveness. In his job with the Navy he has successfully urged and guided that service toward a much greater under- standing cf its operational environment. We want to add our voice to the ehorus of applause for a job very well done, indeed. We wish Dr. Wakelin all the best in whatever his new venture turns out to be and hope it will be related to man’s effort to explore and exploit the oceans—an effort that needs more, not fewer, such men. Concurrently, we look forward to Dr. Morse earry- ing on a now-established fine tradition in these jobs. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 23 Mr. Lennon. You havea prepared statement ? Mr. Waxetin. Yes, sir. Mr. Lennon. Will you proceed with the understanding, sir, if we do not complete your statement today we wondered if it would be possible for you to resume and continue it tomorrow at 10? Mr. Waxketin. Yes, sir. Mr. Lennon. Thank you, sir. Go ahead. STATEMENT OF HON. JAMES H. WAKELIN, JR., ASSISTANT SECRE- TARY OF THE NAVY (RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT) AND CHAIRMAN OF THE INTERAGENCY COMMITTEE ON OCEAN- OGRAPHY OF THE FEDERAL COUNCIL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Mr. Waxeuin. Mr. Chairman and members of the committee; may I express for the Interagency Committee on Oceanography members our appreciation for this opportunity to outline for you the last 2 years’ progress of the national oceanographic program and our hopes and aspirations for the forthcoming fiscal year 1965. My appearances before you today will be my last to testify on our oceanographic work. I plan to relinquish the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research and Development next month, and I can think of no more fitting time or place for my final appear- ance as ICO Chairman than before this committee which has for 4 years spearheaded congressional interest in the marine sciences. The origin and development of the national oceanographic program have nowhere been outlined as comprehensively as in your own excel- lent committee reports. Consequently, I will not attempt to duplicate previous material in this discussion but will limit myself to a descrip- tion of our progress since our last meeting and a summary of our plans for fiscal year 1965. For your information, Mr. Chairman, the following persons will appear before your committee to discuss in detail various parts of our program: Dr. I. E. Wallen, Chairman, Oceanographic Research Panel, Smith- sonian Institution. Comdr. Harley Nygren, Acting Chairman, Ocean Survey Panel, Coast and Geodetic Survey. Dr. Arthur FE. Maxwell, Chairman, International Program Panel, Office of Naval Research. These gentlemen will discuss our oceanographic efforts. The fol- lowing will describe supporting activities: Capt. T. K. Treadwell, Chairman, Oceanographic Ships Panel, Office of the Chief of Naval Operations. Mr. Donald L. McKernan, Chairman, Instrumentation and Facil- ities Panel, Bureau of Commercial Fisheries. Dr. Woodrow Jacobs, Director, National Oceanographic Data Center. Since our last meeting, 28 months ago, on the 27th of February 1962, the ICO has undergone a few organizational changes. There have been numerous changes in the composition of our committee and our panels and, for your reference, I would like to furnish the latest roster of committee, panel, and consultant personnel. (The information mentioned follows :) 1965 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM 24 1 210. STUD TIA, Wey VOR JO PRS ROLIRUR TL Peeve jo peeing ee BOTA REIDY SOUCY Yregeg Jouvion KASIOG BLROSTS SY IS VOD A (2300S JO Sa (Aly Re) aeae LEQ BEV BI ler ROT PA (0 B 230 rene ne Baz £ BUUGIOS 10 YOR LBs oe 18 Rb UBIO OD “BOON TS BOpeny MOVER SeS0ny a1 18 vee an EG Ae PUB ICOALT OOS URAC GR iI UCTERIUUEO SOLOOy BOE BWOVEORI F COUR TIS fear ies $70) Aansne (ASL IDR BUBIIOD PRE ISYOD OST; abs is ay AOULO Bay ny) sas 25 1965 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM: 2°26 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Mr. Waxetin. You may remember that you inquired specifically about the positions of the Smithsonian Institution and the Army Corps of Engineers in the ICO scheme. Since our last meeting with: you, the Smithsonian Institution has been given full membership on the committee, and Dr. I. E. Wallen is its permanent representative. The Army, as part of the Defense Department, is represented on the full committee by myself as chairman; however, Mr. Joseph Caldwell of the Coastal Engineering Research Center has been added to the ICO: Working Group. As I will expand on later in this statement, the De- partment of State has been given full membership on the ICO. You will recall also that at our last meeting your committee gave particular emphasis to our need for central staff support to carry out the ever-increasing functions and responsibilities which attend our growth. In accordance with your suggestion in this regard, the ICO has set up such a staff. The composition of our staff reflects the typical interagency cooperative attitude that the ICO personifies. For in- stance, salary funding is provided by the Office of Naval Research, the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries, the Public Health Service, the Oceanographic Office, and the Coast and Geodetic Survey. Personnel billets have been provided by the Coast Guard, the Oceanographic Office, the Oceanographic Data Center, the Public Health Service. and the Naval Research Laboratory. The major portion of supplies and services are provided as a matter of fact by the Office of Naval Re- search as the operating arm of the ICO chairman, but at least 15 of the ICO member agencies have from time to time provided much valuable assistance to us in this area. As you can readily imagine, the importance of a national program in oceanography is being brought increasingly to the attention of the American public. The number of books and articles is increasing at a high rate. To provide the best possible reference to this large volume of literature, the ICO last year compiled and issued our Pam- phlet No. 9, Bibliography of Oceanographic Publications. We have listed herein 500 selective titles including treatises, textbooks, diction- aries, directories, bibliographies, periodicals, maps, films, histories,. biographies, and nontechnical books and articles under 36 subject headings. We have also indicated the reading level and content. I should like to introduce this with your permission. (See app. 2, p. 171.) Mr. Waxe.in. A couple of years ago, at the suggestion of Dr. John Lyman of the National Science Foundation, the ICO began a com- pilation of university curriculums in oceanography to provide infor- mation about training programs in the marine sciences. Our pur- pose was to provide information for students, to increase the exchange of information among the schools, and to aid employers of personnel trained in the various disciplines which comprise oceanography. We have described the programs and facilities of each institution and have listed the courses that are taught, the names of the faculty mem- bers, the degrees that are offered, descriptions of courses, and the per- son to contact for further information. The demand for this publi- cation exceeded our forecasts by at least an order of magnitude and the document now enjoys international distribution. I should like to submit this document for the record with your permission. Mr. Lennon. We will go off the record for just a minute. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Dili (Discussion off the record.) Mr. Lennon. Onthe record. Without objection, that will be included in the record at this point. (See app. 3, p. 201.) Mr. Waxetin. In referring to the demand for this or any of our publications, I should mention that the ICO is becoming almost uncom- fortably aware of our recognition by the reading public, particularly when it is evidenced in the some 10,000 letters we receive each year covering a wide variety of questions and comments. Weare apparently becoming a focus of attention for those who would like to know how to get jobs in oceanography, how the oceans affect their particular way of life, where business might be conducted in oceanography, or just plain questions about things going on in the ocean. However, the one question which seems to be occurring more than any other, to our interest and pleasure, is that concerning a career in oceanography. In response to literally hundreds of questions regard- ing school and professional careers in oceanography, the ICO has compiled a book entitled “Opportunities in Oceanography” which we expect to be published sometime next month. I should like to offer our prepublication copy for your information at this time. We have tried to attract the student at an early level and to de- scribe therein how he looks at oceanography in high school, how he might prepare himself throughout his undergraduate years, where, when, and how he will study oceanography at the graduate level, the various methods of obtaining financial assistance in getting through school, problems connected with his academic and professional ca- reers, professional societies he may join, and finally and most im- portantly, the probable shape of his professional career. Based on our experience, we are anticipating a tremendous demand for this book and will be delighted to furnish additional copies for the mem- bers of your committee. We expect this, Mr. Chairman, to be ready in about 2 weeks. Dr. Wallen of the Smithsonian Institution brought this copy in for us for you to look at. While I cannot, in fact, submit this for the record, I should like to submit it for the committee to look at prior to its publication in finished form. Mr. Lennon. We will be glad to look at it. Mr. Waxetin. The ICO possesses a convenient organizational mo- bility for carrying out mrany assignments. For instance, in answer to a recent congressional request, we were able to compile a critical list- ing of all the activities in the aquatic sciences in the Great Lakes area. Through our communications structure, we were able to do this with a minimum of effort even though the ICO does not formally consider the Great Lakes within its geographic cognizance. With your per- mission, I should like to introduce a copy of this report for the record. (See app. 4, p. 369.) Mr. Waxetin. I had mentioned that the ICO has acquired a small working staff. I think it is fitting here to describe for you the nature of the assignments of the individual staff members. It was never our intention to centralize our operation in anything like a bureaucratic manner ; however, there is one point in the ICO operation which criti- ny depends upon availability of trained manpower on a continuing asis. 28 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 As you pointed out at our last meeting, the panels, which carry the real brunt of the ICO policy-formation load, themselves depend upon people who have other primary jobs in the Government. A1- though they can advise, formulate policy, and address themselves to needs, they generally do not possess anyone to “do the work.” Accord- ingly, as the ICO has acquired new staff, each has been assigned _per- manently to one or more panel chairmen. This will prove helpful to the panels who will thus be able to draw conclusions and make rec- ommendations secure in the knowledge that they can follow through and complete their staff action in a reasonable period of time. In addi- tion, continuity of communications and organization is maintained not only within any particular panel but among the panels to the extent that they need to work together. We have found this last aspect of staff assignment to be particularly valuable in that our panel memberships change frequently. The ICO is attempting to consolidate its facilities as well as its administration. As space has become available with the withdrawal of naval elements from the Navy yard and the Navy yard annex, a number of our agencies, individually and through staff coordination, have been able to acquire space there. By the end of this month, one corner of the Navy yard will be shared by the oceanographic com- ponents of the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries, the Oceanographic Office of the Navy Department, the instrumentation and data centers, Coast Guard, Coast and Geodetic Survey, Geological Survey, Smith- sionian Institution, and the ICO staff itself. We look forward to this colocation as one further step in the tightening of inteagency coopera- tion and communication in oceanography. In recognition of the rapidly growing role of oceanography in our international relationships, the State Department, as I indicated earlier in my statement, has been given full membership im the com- mittee. At the time of our last meeting, this Nation was committed to the International Indian Ocean Expedition, and we were planning the International Cooperative Investigations of the Tropical Atlantic. Both of these programs have flourished and their success has encour- aged the international community to plan and implement several other joint ventures. Dr. Arthur Maxwell, Chairman of our Panel on International Programs, will discuss the status and accomplishments of these programs and will more comprehensively outline the rationale which tends to focus attention on oceanography as an increasingly use- ful element in international diplomacy. In earlier hearings, your committee pointed clearly to the overriding need for a unifying long-range plan and a set of goals to guide our national effort in oceanography. In the year following 1963, the ICO completed and published what we believe to be the first long-range plan designed to unite the efforts of the many Federal agencies con- tributing to this program. It is entitled, “Oceanography: The Ten Years Ahead,” approved and forwarded to Congress by Dr. Wiesner on July 26,1963. Ihave it here and with your permission I would like to introduce it also for the record. Mr. Lennon. Without objection it will be inserted in the record following your remark. (See app. 5, p. 425.) NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 29 I should emphasize that this is not an executive planning document in a stepwise programatic sense; this would have been most unrealistic and would have created more problems than it solved. Rather, as stated in the document itself, we have tried to provide a bridge between scientific discovery and application and to indicate a desirable balance of effort among the institutions in universities, government, and industry who undertake this work. As I pointed out earlier, your committee also suggested that no accomplishment of the ICO could exceed in total value that of estab- lishing strong and clear national goals in oceanography. This publi- eation, “Oceanography: The Ten Years Ahead,” reflects the consider- able attention we have paid to this sector of the planning spectrum in that we have drafted our plan within the framework of a statement of national goals. We have listed the support of basic science as the primary goal since it is the reservoir from which all applications must be drawn. This is not sheer altruism. We know from experience in war, in tough economic competition, and in man’s fight for a life free of poverty and disability, that research pays. It is the Federal Government that, in oceanography as well as in other fields, has strengthened basic research to provide the reservoir of knowledge needed to satisfy specific practical objectives. It must thus assume some responsibility for training and educating highly skilled manpower that it consumes, in- cluding the sponsorship of basic research undertaken by graduate students and by their faculty advisers. We have naturally listed defense first among the areas of applica- tion. This is, of course, in line with our national outlook in all fields. It has become widely accepted that we, like the other major nations of the world, have a heavy stake in the preservation of peace. In the current world situation, military strength is a necessary element in our way of life. This must be a national capability so strong that the fact of its availability to the free world is a deterrent to major infractions of the peace of the cold war. Within our defense team, the Navy’s domain is the world ocean— from its deepest depths up through the air-sea interface and into the skies and space above. During peacetime, one of its most important missions is maintaining the freedom of the seas so that we and other nations of the world may enjoy the advantages of waterborne com- merce and transportation so vital to our growing economy. During wartime, it must, in addition, deny this freedom to the enemy. The Polaris deterrent, antisubmarine and mine countermeasure forces, carrier attack and amphibious forces—all depend for safe, effective operation on accurate knowledge of the ocean environment. Develop- ment of nuclear-propelled submarines makes submerged operation for long periods of time possible, and this creates under the sea an extensive area for naval operations, and one that must become familiar to us. Next, we have problems of resource management and the control of marine wealth in the world oceans, particularly concerning the world fisheries, their importance to mankind and the interrelationships between the fish populations and the oceanographic environment. Fish are an important source of protein for the diets of many peoples of the world, but we know very little about their growth patterns and 30—-377— 64—_—_ 3 30 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 habits of particular fish, reasons for their migration, or of means to increase stocks and catches. Ocean water, and especially the ocean bed, may be the source of minerals that the world must exploit when ores and fossil fuels now found on land are depleted. ‘These resources are now unknown in rich- ness and distribution. Extensive, sophisticated surveys may be re- quired to inventory this potential. We have examined problems of protecting the public from the many threats posed by the sea, in- cluding pollution, storms, seismic activity, and erosion, while at the same time acknowledging the oceans’ beneficial and aesthetic char- acter and its impact on recreation. Finally, we have recognized here the sea’s limitations as an atomic waste absorber and its function in relation to the making of weather. An important function of the long-range plan is to permit the formulation of the individual annual programs in more coherent fashion. We are thus enabled each year to take stock of ourselves and to see where we stand in the context of the 10-year effort. Mr. Chairman, I think it worthwhile to note a significant change in our approach to the program planning process, which has occurred since our last meeting. At that time, our young committee was con- cerned with initiating a program of national importance. Prior to that time, the salient problems we had were: (a) A lack of resources—ships, labs, men, tools, and money: (6) Lack of awareness at the departmental level of the rela- tionship of oceanography to individual agency roles and missions; (c) Spotty communications among and within agencies; and (d) Nostrong definition of long-range goals. At the time of the hearings the [CO was in the midst of tackhng and reducing these problems, as reflected in our annual issuance of the national oceanographic program documents. As evidence of this, I would like to introduce ICO Pamphlet No. 11, national oceano- graphic program, fiscal year 1964. (See app. 6, p. 495.) You will note that this pamphlet, like its predecessors, approaches the problem of program organization via the avenue of function, in terms of effort—that is research, surveys, international cooperation, and support—that is, design and construction of instruments, facil- ities, and ships, and development of trained manpower. Now, note the arrangement of our pamphlet No. 15, the program document for the forthcoming fiscal year 1965. (See app. 7, p. 567.) This is the first annual plan prepared since publication of the long- range plan, and it begins to be oriented toward the goals we have laid out. I would like to invite your attention to this document for a few moments. In it we have tried to follow the theme of our long-range plan and to organize our resources to exploit the diverse ways in which the oceans contribute to the Nation’s security and welfare. In plan- ning our oceanographic effort, we have categorized our research into the following: (a) Physical properties and motion of the sea: Weare aiming for improvements in ship design, more efficient commerce, antisubmarine warfare advantages, and better disaster control. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 31 (b) Ocean-atmosphere interrelationships: The objectives relevant to this category include both weather and ocean prediction. (c) Biological properties: More effective exploitation of the ocean’s living resources is the most important goal in this section. (d) Structure and history of the sea floor: We envision research application to antisubmarine warfare problems, mapping require- ments, and development of mineral and other resources. (e) Modification of the sea: Undesirable and dangerous effects of pollution of coastal and estuarine waters on food resources and on rec- reational areas are already well known and are likely to increase unless checked by wise planning. The potential danger of release of radio- active material in the ocean also needs thorough and continuing study. In each of these cases, research of various kinds is essential. The ocean also can be deliberately modified in local areas in order to achieve certain desirable results: beach erosion can be controlled, sur- face waves minimized, et cetera. At present, achievements of this sort are slow in forthcoming, but research directed toward increased useful modification of the sea 1s needed. A topic of great concern to the ICO concerns deep research vehicles. A very few scientists have for a long time proclaimed an urgent need for the means by which man can descend to take personal charge of operations in the deep sea environment. These voices went mostly un- heeded, for, as you know, man responds best to challenge and for many years, challenge was lacking. The tragic loss of the submarine Thresher, however, has awakened many of us to our inability to cope with such disasters. Two weeks ago I was privileged to preside at the dedication of Alvin, the first deep research vehicle designed and con- structed in this country. Up to this time, the only American-owned vehicle capable of operat- ing at the depth where the 7hresher was lost was the bathyscaph Trieste [—now remodeled as Trieste JJ. The future looks somewhat better; we hope that Aluminaut and Deep Star will be completed this year. Significantly, both of these vehicles have been designed and constructed by industrial firms without Government support. A matter which has concerned the ICO almost from its inception is the achievement of the proper balance between effort and resources to which I alluded briefly at the start of my discussion. A productive research program requires adequate resources In many areas. If the program is to maintain a healthy growth, this growth must be maintained in phase among the ships which are the labora- tories of oceanography, scientists to man the ships and conduct the research programs, facilities to support the ships and to train the scientists, and tools with which the scientist can conduct his experi- ments. The ICO is aware of the need for the establishment of useful ways of relating resources to effort so that we can more intelligently develop our program plans. Some of these indexes are difficult to evaluate. We know, for instance, that about four persons are required ashore to support a man at sea; that it requires about $30,000 to support a research oceanographer; that about one-fourth of our research funds go merely to fuel, crew, and to repair our ships, and that it takes about 6 years past the baccalaureate for an oceanographer to attain 32 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 his Ph. D. We have arrived at a pretty fair relationship between ship availability and miles of surveys completed; nonetheless, this is an area, popularly known as operations research, where we can see considerable room for further refinement. This brings me to the most important single problem facing the ICO. I will assume the liberty of speaking in complete candor, with your permission, Mr. Chairman. We certainly believe that we have resolved most of the communica- tions problems in the executive branch of the Government. Our agencies and departments have achieved harmonious working arrange- ments in oceanography at all levels. However, our coordination seems to lose its effectiveness once the program passes to Congress for review. T should like to introduce, with your permission, Mr. Chairman, a chart depicting all of the various congressional committees and sub- committees, both substantive and appropriations, to which our member agencies report. (The chart mentioned faces this page.) As nearly as we can tell, there is little communication among these 30-plus committees, and no matter how well coordinated our program may be, in the final analysis each of the agency participants in the national oceanographic program must defend its own segment of that program to a separate congressional committee. Yet, ours is a truly Government-wide program. We commonly cut across agency and departmental boundaries and have become in- creasingly skilled in utilizing programs and resources in common. Nonetheless, the collective strength we enjoy in the establishment of a national program can be weakened appreciably by reduction of indi- vidual agency and department programs with the result that the entire effort suffers. None of our past attempts to solve this problem has met with success. In previous discussions, your committee discussed with Dr. Wiesner the possibilities of improving intra-House commu- nications. Earlier this year, in my appearance before the Armed Forces Appropriations Committee, Senators Russell and Saltonstall both expressed their sympathy for our plight and their recognition of the need for a focal point of oceanographic activity within the Congress. This, then, is our major problem, and we are very much afraid that it will lead to program stagnation. For instance, the fiscal year 1964 President’s budget of $156 million was reduced to the fiscal year 1963 level of $124 million by congressional committee action. Based on evidence developed thus far, the future of our fiscal 1965 program does not look much better. The fact is we are developing an oceanographic capability in the United States, and we are concerned that we may not be able to com- pletely realize this potential. As more sophisticated instrumentation is developed, it also becomes more expensive to operate. Education costs, ship operating costs, and salaries are still rising. Yet we are confronted by level funding. Consequently, the highly publicized national oceanographic program may actually be starting downhill. 35-377 O - 64 (Face p. 32) COMMERCE Coast & Geodetic Survey Weather Bureau Maritime Adm. INTERIOR ~ Bureau of Commercial Fisheries Bureau of Sport Fisheries & Wildlife Geological Survey Bureau of Mines NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION ATOMIC ENERGY COMM. HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE Public Health LEGISLATIVE BODIES APPLICABLE TO ICO MEMBER AGENCIES' OCEANOGRAPHY PROGRAMS 1/ HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES SENATE SUBSTANTIVE APPROPRIATION SUBSTANTIVE Fr wenaias Maar a aoe etanas Public Works Public Works Merchant Marine State, Justice, and Fisheries Commerce, & Judiciary Interstate & Foreign Commerce Merchant Marine Merchant Marine and Fisheries Fisheries & Wild- Dept. of Interior and life Cons. Releted Agencies |. cpa ol Armed Services Defense Appropriations | Flood Control - Public Works Public Works Rivers & Harbors Merchant Marine Commerce and Fisheries pany Fish mon es a and Fisheries Interior and Insular Affairs Research & Development River & Harbors CG, C&GS, and Navigation State, Justice, Commerce, & Judiciary Commerce & Finance Dept. of Interior & Related Agencies Lea — = Interior and Public Lands Insular Affairs Irrigation & Reclamation Be cae ati ae Science, Research & Science & Independent Offices Development Astronautics ae 2/ Public Works Public Health & Saftey] Interstate & Irrigation & Reclamation Public Lands Minerals, Materials & Fuels Minerals, Materials & Fuels Labor & Public welfare Labor and Public Service Foreign Commerce Labor, HEW & Related Welfare Labor, HEW & Related Rivers & Harbors Public Works Agencies Special Sub-Comm, | Public Works Agencies do on Air and Water Pollution Office of i Special Education Education & Education Labor and Education Labor Public Welfare TREASURY Coast Guard CG, C&GS, & Merchant Marine Depts. of Treasury & Merchant Marine Commerce Depts. of Treasury & Navigation and Fisheries Post Office & Executive and Fisheries Post Office & Executive | Office Office SMITHSONIAN | Oceanography do Dept. of Interior & Smithsonian Rules & Dept. of Interior & Related Agencies Administration Related Agencies 1/ The substantive sequence is not always applicable as program authorization frequently is implied in an organization's charter Interagency Committee on Oceanography wslee 2/ Joint Committee on Atomic ergy March 1964 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 33 In consideration of the potential involved, we consider this a most depressing outlook. I would like to introduce some evidence in sup- port of this potential. The budget of the U.S. Government for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1965, shows a 1965 estimated source of receipt to the U.S. Treasury of $260 million for “rent on Outer Continental Shelf lands” which is twice the budget for the entire national oceanographic program. This concludes my statement, Mr. Chairman, and I am open to your questioning, and that of the committee. I have also brought with mea copy of the film “Oceanography : Science for Survival” which describes the organization, the objectives, and the activities of the ICO. I will be delighted to show it at any time during these hearings, at your con- venience. After you have concluded your questions, I would like to introduce Dr. I. E. Wallen, chairman of the research panel whe will expand on our general ICO effort and highlight some of the accomplishments in the research area. Thank you very much, sir. Mr. Lennon. Doctor, the ICO pamphlet No. 11, national oceano- graphic program, fiscal year 1964, without objection, will be included in the record following Dr. Wakelin’s statement. The chart that you referred to on page 17 which you asked permission to be included in the record, without objection that will be included in the record fol- lowing your statement. Now, could we go off the record ? (Discussion off the record.) Mr. Lennon. On the record. We'll begin with Mr. Pelly. Mr. Petty. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I would like to associate myself with the statement that you made at the beginning of the testimony of Secretary Wakelin; I think you have placed in the record something of the recognition of his accomplish- ments and I certainly want to state for my part, Dr. Wakelin, it has been a great pleasure for me to see what you have done in the way of coordinating the oceanographic efforts of the various agencies of Government. I do not think there is anyone that is familiar with this work that would not admit that a large part of the success has been due to your own personal efforts in this respect. I think your service in Government is something which speaks for itself. You are going to have a very prominent place in the annals of oceanography because I think you have set the program up on a sound basis and maybe you are dissatisfied with the fact that there is not more money forthcoming and feel you have not been fully successful, but I think you have or- ganized our national effort on a sound basis and you have all the various heads of these agencies working closely together. It has been a real pleasure to me to observe your work and I only want to say how much I regret the fact that you are not going to be before this committee in the future. It has been a number of years of service that you have given to the Government and you certainly have contributed a great deal. Mr. Waxetin. Thank you very much. 34 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 I might say it has been a great privilege for me to be Chairman of the ICO and we have had, I think, an unusually wonderful group of members and alternates. T have known of no committee In my career im which we have kept as closely to objectivity as it is possible to keep and have remained friends and have admired one another’s accomplish- ments in the other agencies. It has been a wonderful experience for me and I regret having to step down from this position and to leave my friends. Mr. Petty. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Lennon. Doctor, let me ask you. There were some questions that I wanted to ask when the others finished. I will yield to you, Mr. Keith, if you cannot be here tomorrow because I understand that Dr. Wakelin could be back. Mr. Kerru. Two of my questions can go over until tomorrow. Mr. Lennon. What about you, Mr. Rogers ? Mr. Rogers. Yes, sir. Mr. Lennon. I think counsel wants to ask a couple of questions and it will take a little time to develop them. Then, gentlemen, if you can conveniently come back, we will adjourn until tomorrow morning at 10. (Whereupon, at 12:10 p.m., the hearing was adjourned, to recon- vene at 10 a.m., Wednesday, June 24, 1964.) NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 WEDNESDAY, JUNE 24, 1964 Houses oF REPRESENTATIVES, SUBCOMMITTEE ON OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE CoMMITTEE ON MrercHANT MARINE AND FISHERIES, Washington, D.C. The subcommittee met at 10 a.m., pursuant to call, in room 219, Can- non House Office Building, Hon. Alton Lennon (chairman of the sub- committee) presiding. Mr. Lennon. The subcommittee will resume its hearings. I see that Dr. Wakelin is here. I do not recall at the conclusion of the hearing yesterday that any member of the committee had an opportunity to question you. Mr. Ellsworth, do you care to open with some questions ? Mr. Exiswortu. Thank you. I have not yet completed reading Dr. Wakelin’s statement, so I pass at this time. I may say, though, I notice from the first page of his statement that he is planning to re- linquish his office as Assistant Secretary of the Navy next month. I want to take this opportnunity to wish him smooth sailing in whatever course he charts for the future and express appreciation to Dr. Wakelin for the fine work he has done in our Government over a period of three administrations, and particularly for the wonderful cooperation he has given to this committee, especially with regard to legislation that the House has passed. I will say further that it has been a real personal pleasure to become acqainted with Dr. Wakelin—and once again, smooth sailing on your future course, Mr. Lennon. I assure you that those sentiments are shared by all the members of this committee who have been privileged to work with Dr. Wakelin over the years. Mr. Kerru. I would like to join in the sentiments which you, as the committee chairman, have expressed. I have not been on this sub- committee very long. I have found it most interesting, particularly representing, as I do, the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. I have gotten to know Dr. Wakelin from his visits to that institution. We have profited from his extensive knowledge on this subject. I am learning a lot. I note in your testimony that there was $260 million paid for rent on the Outer Continental Shelf lands. It may not be appropriate to this discussion, but I would like to have you just briefly describe the sources of this revenue, This appears on page 18 of your testimony. 35 36 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 STATEMENT OF DR. JAMES H. WAKELIN, JR., ASSISTANT SECRE- TARY OF THE NAVY (RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT) AND CHAIRMAN, INTERAGENCY COMMITTEE ON CCEANOGRAPHY OF THE FEDERAL COUNCIL FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY— Resumed Dr. Waxetin. This is in the budget of the U.S. Government for fiscal year 1965. It appears on page 65 under the general heading, “Administrative Budget Funds, Miscellaneous Receipts.” Under a heading entitled “Rents, Rent on Outer Continental Shelf Lands,” is the figure we have quoted here in my statement for a pro- jection into fiscal year 1965 of the expected returns from rent on Outer Continental Shelf lands. The 3 years, 1963, 1964, and 1965 are fol- lowing : 1963 actual, $359 million; estimate for 1964, $174 million; esti- mate for 1965, $262 million. I would presume, although I know nothing about the details of the rent arrangements, or where they are located, that these are mostly for petrochemical explorations, and removal of petrochemicals from the Continental Shelf. Mr. Kerrn. As I mentioned earlier, this is not exactly appropriate to a review of oceanography as such. We are very much concerned in our district with the oceanographic resources that are being tapped by the Russians. I received a phone call over the weekend from a Capt. Albert Dahl, who says that the Russians are so densely populating the offshore lobster fishing grounds that they cannot get through with their own boats. At some time I want to discuss with you further means of controlling the tapping of those resources in the absence of any payment of rent from foreign in- terests who are exploiting them. I do not believe it is appropriate to this discussion, but I would like to alert the public in general, and you in particular, to the need for further ern in this area. Dr. Waxetin. Being a native of your State, Mr. Keith, I have a high degree of personal interest in this particular problem. Mr. Kerra. Everyone does who likes lobster. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Lennon. Thank you, Mr. Keith. We are delighted to have with us this morning the ranking member of the minority of the full committee, who has over the years demonstrated a great deal of interest in this matter. He has been a help to this committee. We welcome him to this hearing. Would you like to question the witness? Mr. Totierson. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I did not hear the witness’ testimony yesterday. I have a couple of questions in mind that are very, very general, and they will sound amateurish to you. In 1959, one of our subcommittee went over to the Orient. We were in Japan and we met with Diet members interested in fisheries and shipping, and likewise met with Japanese departmental people having to do with fisheries. One of the things that struck me quite forcibly was the fact in those fishery meetings there was always a NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Bie representative of the Japanese Government, or more than one, inter- ested in oceanographic matters. I got the impression that the fish- eries people and the oceanographic people in Japan work very closely together. I asked them if that were not the case, and they said yes, they had worked very closely together for a long period of time. I got the impression that the Japanese have been engaged in ocean- ography work for a long period time and probably in some respects were ahead of us. Could you comment on that ? Dr. Waxettn. I can very generally, Mr. Tollefson. Our impression of the earlier work in Oceanography in Japan is that it derives from their particular interest in fishing. They are in- terested in the food supply for their islands. For this reason I believe their interest in the whole ocean area, both physical and chemical oceanography, stems from the food interest they have for their people. This is somewhat different than the earlier starts we have made in this country. We have had three different segments in general in our program, quite distinct from the Japanese interest in food, and that is in physical oceanography, in marine biology, and in whatever air and sea interactions are involved in the meterological aspects. These have not been as closely associated with the food resources of the sea. We work very closely with Mr. McKernan’s group in the Depart- ment of Interior. He has educated us to the requirement for oceano- eraphic information with respect to the natural resources, the living resources of the seas, and I think now that our particular program in fishing resources 1s more nearly geared to the use of oceanography as the Japanese have developed it than it was prior to 1959 or 1960. Mr. Totterson. You answered the next question I was going to ask, and that is, whether or not our Fish and Wildlife people are working with other Government oceanographic personnel on oceanography matters. Jam glad to hear you say they are. Now, is there an exchange of the information between say the Japa- hese and our Government people, and likewise, is there an exchange between our Government and other governments? Do you work with other governments? Is there an exchange of information ? Dr. Waxettn. Yes, there is. There are roughly two mechanisms for exchanging information. The formal mechanism among govern- ments is through the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission, which is affiliated with UNESCO. I believe there were 37 nations who started this IOC in 1961 in Paris, and I think the membership has increased to about 50. While there are a number of cooperative enterprises in which the IOC has been engaged, such as the Indian Ocean Expedition and the Tropical Atlantic Expedition, their particular budget for research is rather small in comparison with the budget of the participating nations. However, there is a free and open exchange of information on natural resources, on physical and chemical oceanography, and on meteorological aspects that affect and control the sea. 388 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 I might also add, sir, that Mr. McKernan, whose interests is primarily in the living marine resources of the seas, headed our delegation to the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission just a few weeks ago in Paris. He may wish to elaborate on that further when he comes to the stand. Mr. Totterson. We will bear down on him. Dr. Waxettn. I have not completed one other aspect. The National Science Foundation is the agent of this Government for a cooperative study, with Japan, of research and investigative proj- ects in which we may both be interested in the Northern Pacific. This isapart from the IOC. Mr. Totterson. Just one more question. Legislation emanating from this committee having to do with ocean- ography sought to coordinate the various Government oceanographic efforts. Has that legislation been working well? Dr. Waxe.in. The legislation, as I understand it, has not passed the Senate, if you are talking about H.R. 6997. Mr. Totterson. I have forgotten the number. Dr. Waxe.tin. We in the Interagency Committee on Oceanography strongly endorsed the bill as providing a means to coordinate better efforts among the agencies involved in our program. We hope it will pass both Houses and be enacted into law. Mr. Rocers. Again, I want to say to Secretary Wakelin how much we have appreciated his good services over the years. We know of your fine work. Certainly you are to be commended and congratu- lated for getting this field goimg in a much faster manner than it was when you came. Dr. Waxeutn. Thank you, sir. Mr. Rocers. You have certainly given it great impetus. I think we need todo much. This has been indicated by your testimony. You discuss the problem you have in the Congress, Congress not getting an entire picture of this, which I think is a great problem in finding support for an oceanographic program which is as extensive as 1t should be. What is your feeling about trying to set up a department where we would bring all of the activities of research for oceanography together, even though it would have the various phases of it? Dr. Waxetrn. That isa difficult question to answer in specifics, Mr. Rogers. May I attempt one? The current bill which has been passed by the House and which emanates from this particular committee, H.R. 6997, I believe is ade- quate for the support and coordination of work which is done cooperatively among the agencies and departments of our Government which have a mission in the general field of the oceans, or a particular need for oceanographic information. There are other problems which we are going to have to face to which this bill, while it embraces the cooperative programs of a number of departments, may not be the correct answer in the long run. Iam talking first about the programs NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 39 that fall between departments and between missions and, second, about roles that we are just beginning to face now. We talked yesterday about some of the problems in the air-sea inter- action field which are common to the whole realm of meteorology and to the domain of oceanography and the interaction of the sea and atmosphere which acts as a tremendous heat engine. There is really no one agency that is responsible for this, and for this particular reason Dr. Weisner, with Dr. Hollomon’s and my support, suggested that the Department of Commerce be named as the coordinating agency for programs included in both the Interdepartmental Com- mittee on Atmospheric Sciences and the Interagency Committee on Oceanography. That is one example of a field that falls between particular roles and missions of the departments. The second field in which we have a vital interest in the Navy is ocean engineering. While the Navy Department is not responsible for the domestic use of engineering devices in the sea, it does have a military mission, including recovery of objects from the ocean and personnel rescue and recovery. Apart from this, there is a whole general field of ocean engineering which will open up for our whole free enterprise system an industry concerned with the capability of working in and exploiting the seas. This is not a single agency or single department job. Thirdly, there is the field of deep research vehicles which allows you to get down into the domain and begin to work in it apart from the engineering devices that these vehicles may incorporate, or carry. Here, again, we are all interested in deep research vehicles, not only for a military purpose, but for the furtherance of our ability to work in and become a part of the sea environment at great depths. Tt seems to me that while H.R. 6997 is eminently adequate for those roles and missions that are quite clearly defined, we are going into a new area now where we need the cooperation and the help of industry in engineering and in deep research vehicle technology. We do not necessarily believe the ICO to be the best mechanism for this, but I do not think that a separate department which would excise from each of the agencies their own jobs in oceanography, together with those that fall between the agencies, is the answer either. Perhaps what we need is a mechanism by which the ‘between agency” tasks can be pulled together in parallel with your legislation from this committee. Does that in part answer the question ? Mr. Rogers. Yes, I understand your feeling. et me ask you this: How often does your Interagency Committee meet ¢ Dr. Waxettn. The full Committee meets on the average of about once a month. The panels within the Committee, Mr. Rogers, meet more often than that in the detailed review of their programs. Mr. Rocrrs. I see. Do they have a regular set schedule for meeting or not? AQ NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Dr. Waxettn. Usually the schedule is set by the deadlines that we have to meet in the program preparation, of either a program, a plan, orabudget. There are usually no set dates. Mr. Rogers. And who calls the meetings of your various panels? Dr. Waxetin. The panel chairman calls the meeting. Mr. Rocrrs. Do you designate a chairman ? Dr. Waxketin. Yes, and I convene the meetings of the Interagency Committee on Oceanography. Mr. Rogers. You have developed some staff for your Interagency Committee ? Dr. WakeELIN. Yes. Mr. Rocrrs. This is good. What does that consist of? Dr. Waxettn. I think that I received that in my statement. Mr. Abel here is the secretary of the ICO, and I believe he has on his central staff three in addition to himself. Would you like to elaborate on that? May I defer to Mr. Abel? Mr. Ape. I have three assistants. They are funded cooperatively by a number of agencies. Hopefully, they will be assigned to the panels on a semi-permanent basis so that they can carry out the work of the panels. Mr. Rogers. Your three people would be assigned to perhaps two or three panels? Mr. Apen. Yes. Mr. Rogers. You have six panels? Q Mr. Apew. Yes. Mr. Rogers. So each would take care of two panels ? Mr. Asen. Well, depending on the work the panels are assigned to at any given time. There is a seasonal approach to this. Mr. Rogers. Do you devote all your time to this work? Mr. Apex. Yes. Mr. Roeers. And these three assistants devote all their time to this work ? Mr. Aper. Yes. Mr. Rogers. How much time would you say members of the Inter- agency Committee devote to your work ? Dr. Waxeiin. I would like to use myself as an example. As you know, I have other responsibilities in the Department of the Navy. Mr. Rogers Very definitely. That is what I am concerned about. Dr. Waxetry. And perhaps, if I can give you an idea of the fraction of my time, it might be representative of the other members, but I cannot speak specifically for them. I would presume, in looking over the time I have spent on the ICO and ICO matters, either with the Committee, with the panel chairman, with the ICO executive secretary, with my special assistant for ocean- ography, Commander Snyder, or the Federal Council for Science and Technology, that is the order of at least 25 or 30 percent of my time, NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 41 averaged out over a year. That is inordinately large, but stems I think from my personal interest in the problems of oceanography and the interest of the Navy Department in the science and technology of the oceans. Mr. Rocrrs. I would presume, perhaps, that other members who are not the chairman would not have to spend that much time on the Inter- agency Committee ? Dr. Waxetin. I cannot answer that in detail. I would like to offer an estimate that probably at least 20 percent of their time—I would think at least 20 percent of their time. Mr. Rocers. Do you operate your ships, oceanographic ships, by con- tract or by personnel in the departments of government? Dr. Waxeurn. In the Navy Department, we operate our ships by two different means: One, naval-staffed vessels in oceanography through the Naval Oceanographic Office; and two, those that are still owned by the Government but assigned to institutions are operated by them in their research work under contract, usually to the Office of Naval Research. Mr. Rocers. And of all of the oceanographic ships, how many would you say operate by contract ? Dr. Waxketin. Mr. Rogers, do you by any chance have the fiscal year 1965 budget? Page 44, I believe, gives you a rundown of those ships, starting with the Conrad, built in 1963, down through the 1966-built date. The first is Lamont Geological Observatory. The next four are Navy. The next oneis Navy. Scripps, University of Washington— 3 out of those 10 projected there are operated under contract. Mr. Rogers. What about those above? Dr. Waxetin. Those above are all operated by the Oceanographic Office. Mr. Rocrrs. None of those are contracted ? Dr. Waxetin. No. Mr. Rocrrs. Do you also contract with institutions who may own their own ships to do the work? Dr. WaxkELIN. Yes, we do. Mr. Rocrrs. What would be the extent of that work? You may not have this at hand. Dr. Waxetrin. Idonot. Icansupply it for the record. There are many private institutions who have what we call boats up to and including maybe 100 to 200 feet long, or maybe shorter than 100 feet, who do special jobs in oceanograph. We can get you that for the record, Mr. Rogers. Mr. Rocers. I would appreciate it if we could have that for the record. (The information referred to follows:) NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 42 ‘Sd]qS WOIvOsSer AACN YIIM poysry + F9CL ls. ee MON | GT coh G6z 82 I LUT eee es eae Tae (poureu JON) :AjIss0AIU oxNG 2961 Seice | P|, coil * ae |e = | &6 Re baal Ee SESS G9 i cpa aes puiixy :A4 SIOATUL YIOX MON ‘leu e961 -U9AMOD | CT SI 0LZ 82 LT ORD et ees I as ae “““pbaA aL :AqsieAtuy piojureyg or lag =, =| Vee ES Say Ua = a i a al ye 5 bk I oy FO fe a “"""8DIS’ PUDIUT SUBSIYOIP jo AyIsIoATa Spee ale = wea cme: oe We in hag SE 708 a ae ee | ae er 66 tant tee 35 ee eae *pjousop *(Suyuyes] juepnys 126— =| 109110 NO | 8 ST ace 14 Or OCT sie seals etch et ee eee eS pLofnvip ue ‘juourdo[eAep 4ueuInI}SUL dA) ee or “SIV | &% 66 00TZ TP GT CLC aes ae A ees Gan aed ee eS UWYO Arjstuaeyo ‘AZoporq u10}40q ‘A1,0uL COBL. Alt ses hea eo tlen «| PS" age eS O08 Stiistiee sl See (0) a a ace ae IT siqunyy -Ayyeq) yorveso1 o1ydeisouves9Q LCG Teena | ene Yoo | 6 A 00¢ 83 61 Che es i a a ae eee T siquopny sHOT}NITYsSUT DJYdvisoUvEdO s[OF]{ SPOO MA *(Aydeis0joyd u104 -joq pue ‘soyouseur ‘uo yyueld ‘sorgsnooe) qoivesel dtydvis0uv000 PrOlo sea oe €I pee SS = WOO R) men aegis = eo Ao ee a OS O8T “quapi4y, :A1oyeroqe’'y oujie yl Josue se1IeN *SUIUICIY YUP *INMO0YOS -njs pue Yorvesel o1ydeisouved(¢) €26T Aqeyixny |} LT 61 PEL ££ LI OO Gi ee Se eee os eee DULAA a Papeee || toes nk seme Pcs ae pk eee ||OPS eS Oa 1 poLUog :£107BAIOSAO [Vd1dO[OeH JUOUIe'T *(queurdo[oA -ep jJuewIMAysuT pues ‘AIWsStuIEyd ‘soljsnooe) yorvosor o1ydvis0ue00Q PPOL: 8) dAV | ¥2 8F 008 ‘% GP oT 00& 8995) YDIs0r SNSN :£10;810qe'T UOspnyT £5141) See ise oa (G2 eee ae wig aee COO ee all ae SS | ee LENS a ee eee AINQSINT HOA wyor ‘od (140) = | ee tee CS eR | area Oe eee she it eto | es || Se = a oe | Seca caren, ae =. 5 AS Te Dplap STUIBIIA, JO AjIsIoATU COG -Siiahen ss Sl tes en ert Flee ad. S| ape ae (0) 77 = od ahaha =i [arate cd OSt a e e ta ee SOUMDIP :950T10O “TW 2 “VY SBXOT, “yoreasol oI dvisoue0dO T96T =J77777 IOIMVIT, | 8 9 : FSI 146 6 ORh te Sy. etc ee DUOIp :AYISIOATUA) 03849 003010 6. 20035 es ae ee RON - | 01 _|-8t __| 008 Te or _.| 281 Ree Soe, eee (Dole bene I : SHAME | “dA | OT ge 19S 62 ai SOT weet Race nie Con oaer cera ras YNUS “WH *(surures} yuepnys pus ‘yuourdo PAGE. alee ea ost g 6 OLT 2G 01 OS Stee Spa eas eee iL -DU0DT -JeAep JUETINIYSUI DTUNSTES ‘soTI0 EGC Bl nsevaw bine =e Fie | eee tor 90Gi pee es oe tee eee COle: See Soo es a eee eas D0JSO0U0IQ -ysg ‘Agoporoejour ‘A r4sturetjo FRGle. Sires ses WG> Saeer so OCR Ret MSS Te oes lige oa eee OS ee CaaS Saas See U0Z LOFT ‘ASOOIq) Yorwesor o1ydeisouvedO PGE 2% SS SL | ST 8I 166 && ¥1 Cll ceniien , ee ee Se ae eke a on ae plo UA OLN Sle Vie SU VeiRtG em geste eae aan 610 % OF ST SIGs Seay =| | ee ae ae eens Saad Rees ae obLy UAE Sys | aie aera aad Gd | oe gee ani OGRiS eae |r eS eta |e se OS TNS: tay ty Bie salen ea ges ee en a ee z21ssDby :Aydvisouves¢ JO m0lyNyWsuUT sddt10g Page Mie Ge] Sees RE ee lle Ae edie: ee gd a eer on. Sallie ego all kee = eer alps ceria Sos pa eS (peureu Jou) 1 YONVY “BUlUIeI) UEP { (SiG) Laem fan zee era ites a |e arate Coe TOR ee eg Rewer ap Ss) | creme oe CON tee Oe ce Ser ae ea eee erate eee So HOH ys pues yorveser o1ydeis0uedG9 COTE Sin tap at ee IZ Il 092 1% a PU ae Mas Sais fae ea ees I ere a snag UuMnosg [H07SUTYSe AA JO AVISIOATU A) os MOIQ quoeuL UWOISSITAL os 9oimo0g -ede[dsiq, weeg qyeid VO Oule N jyueure|du0, a a a a a 8 Ra a Ra oA A eae ec SU0IGNIUSUW aJDUNAA WD SHUG 91yYdD160U0990 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 43 Mr. Rogers. In operating the Interagency Committee, what is your procedure in the settling of diversity of opinion ? Dr. Waxe.tin. Are you referring to the procedural methods we use? Mr. Rogers. Yes. Dr. Waxetin. May I go through and describe very briefly how we develop a given subject, how it gets to the Committee, and what hap- pens after that? Mr. Rocrrs. Yes. Dr. Waxketin. In the beginning of a plan, such as a budget plan, the agencies who are represented on the ICO suggest to the whole ICO plan for the succeeding year. This, then, is given to a given panel, either the research panel, instrumentation panel, or ships panel, for their detailed study. Then when these proposals have all been an- alyzed, and when the panel chairmen are ready to discuss this with the full Committee we meet to discuss the plan in general. In typical fashion, for example, in last year’s budget, the agency submitted a figure for oceanographic support of the order of $200 mil- lion. We reduced this in the ICO to $175 million before submitting the plan formally to the Federal Council. In the procedures leading up to this reduction, each of the steps that were taken in the full Com- mittee were taken more or less by vote. It was the sense of the Commit- tee if there were strong objections, that particular project or particular part of the plan was sent back to the panel for resolution of objec- tions that might have been made by one member or another. It is usually the case that any program which goes to the Federal ae has the unanimous support of the ICO before it leaves the ICO. Mr. Roczrs. It must have unanimous support? Dr. Waxettn. This is not a condition, but in general I think we try to resolve differences of all matters largely of scientific and tech- nical judgment by a sense of the Committee, and if someone on the Committee has a very firm feeling against it, it is usually sent back until it is resolved. Mr. Rocrrs. Suppose there is some diversity of opinion that is not resolved, but it is felt the project should be approved. Would you have the authority to say, we will submit it to the Federal Council ? Dr. Waxetin. I have taken that authority. Mr. Rogers. You have been able to do that? Dr. Waxriin. Yes. I think the Committee has supported me. For example, last year in the program several of us felt it was im- portant to put into our 1965 plan a project in connection with deep holes. Iam not talking about the Mohole, but getting samples in the ae oceans. This was a matter of considerable controversy in the Finally, I suggested that we should submit this, since it did not seem to have unanimous approval of all the members of the ICO, to the Federal Council and inform them this was a matter that I wished to call to their attention, and wished to get their approval on regard-. Ne of the fact there were several members who had adverse opinions about it. Mr. Rogers. You do not use a procedure of letting each depart- ment have a vote? 44 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Dr. Waxetin. No, we do not. In the last 2 years, at least, we have made drastic reductions as a committee to the whole pregram, affect- ing all of us. Mr. Rogers. Let me ask you this: How do you decide the percentage that should be allotted of the funds to each department involved ? Dr. Waxetin. This is based largely, not on the prorated division of funds as funds, but on the substance and importance of the projects submitted by the agency. In several cases, we have exceeded those requests given to us by an agency by ICO action. For example, we have added substantially in the last several years to the Department of the Interior’s budget request to the Federal Council by Committee action and cutting out various other parts of the program, feeling their project was more important to the whole plan in this time period than were others that were in competition with it. Mr. Rogsrs. So there is no specific breakdown ? Dr. Waxetin. There is no relationship, I am happy to say, between what an agency had last year and what they can submit for approval next year. I think this should be done on the substance of the pro- gram, and not on a fund basis. Mr. Rogers. Has the pattern been that the funds pretty much follow the pattern of what the Department had the year before ? Dr. Waxkerin. They have. Mr. Rogers. That has pretty much matched? Dr. Waxetin. It has. Mr. Rocrrs. What three departments would you say have the major funding ? Dr. Waxkettn. I would say the Department of Defense, the Depart- ment of Commerce, and the National Science Foundation, I think in about that order. Mr. Rogers. You have an advisory group, an ad hoc group? Dr. Waxetin. Yes. Mr. Rogers. Of nongovernmental people ? Dr. Waxettn. They are selected by the President’s science adviser, acting as Director of the Office of Science and Technology. Mr. Rogers. Does the Interagency Committee make recommenda- tions to him for his consideration in the selection of those ad hoe committees ¢ Dr. Waxeuin. I think in several cases we have suggested individual members as knowledgable in particular areas, but in general the framework of the whole Committee choice has been up to Dr. Wiesner and now up to Dr. Hornig without much direct coupling from us. Mr. Rogers. What use does your Committee make, or have you made, of the advisory ad hoc committees ? Dr. Waxeuin. We have made a great deal of use of their recom- mendations. They have pointed out in several cases what we con- sider to have been weaknesses in our program. ‘They have been most helpful to us. There are two areas in which they stress the real need for an alteration of emphasis. One was in the shore facilities. As you recall, it takes about four men to support one afloat. While we are building a substantial num- ber of ships, we in general have not kept up with the shore facilities that are going to be adequate for the program in the far future. We have to do more in this area. Since we did not, at the time they NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 45 reviewed our program last year and the year before, put in sufiicient funding for shore facilities, they recommended we give much more attention to this, and we have taken their advice. In the area of research and surveys, there has been a long discussion between the research people and those engaged on surveys. It is partly a semantic argument and partly a misunderstanding. The research scientists In oceanography are not usually interested pri- marily in surveys; they are interested in precise research data. The survey people are interested more in a broad look into an area, like the Indian Ocean, rather than going particularly te one spot and doing an intensive job in research there. By bringing the two groups together, the survey group with the research people, through the National Academy of Sciences, who are engaged in research work in oceanography, we have clarified a lot of differences, we have coor- dinated programs so surveys and research work on a given ship, or group of ships, and can go along together in a more harmonious man- ner. This was also pointed out as a misunderstanding by the ad hoc panels for the last 2 years. They have been most helpful to us, and we have felt that a good outside look at our program has been healthy from the whole point of view. Mr. Rocrrs. Yes. As I understood from previous testimony, the Advisory Committee really works with your panels and with your Interagency Committee, more than it does with the Federal Council. Dr. Waxetin. Well, a typical case in point would be the review of our 1964 program last summer. This took a period of about a week of very intensive examination by the ad hoc panel meeting with each of the panels in detail. Mr. Rocrrs. I see. And then they give their advice and then it comes before the Interagency Committee ? Dr. Waxetin. They give their advice really to Dr. Wiesner and the Federal Council. They pointed out the weaknesses and the strengths of the program. Mr. Rogers. Could you tell me about what amount of money is being expended on the beach erosion problem and wave action problem? Are we intensifying that greatly ? Dr. Waxe.in. It is not a substantial part of our program, Mr. Rogers. Ican give you a figure for Mr. Roesrs. It looks to me like it is about $500,000. Dr. Waxetin. The 1965 budget includes about $800,000 for the Corps of Engineers for work in beach erosion and for the Coastal En- gineering Research Center. As I recall—I think my memory is within an order of magnitude of correctness—this has been about the level of effort for the last 2 years in beach erosion. Mr. Rogers. There has been no increase in that ? Dr. Waxettn. There has not been any substantial increase in beach erosion work in our program. Mr. Rocerrs. Do you feel this is a proper phase of oceanography— beach erosion studies ? Dr. Waxettn. Yes, sir; Ido. I feel that the influence of the ocean on the shoreline, the influence of coastal waters on the relocation of land, sand, and so forth, the effect of waves in remaking, in a large measure, long areas of our shoreline is something we should spend, I think, more than $800,000 a year on. 35-377 64 4 46 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Mr. Rogers. I would agree with you. Dr. WaxKeLin. Tam speaking as an individual. Mr. Rocxrs. I would agree with you wholeheartedly because I know the problem we are having up and down our coastline is tremendous, and the damage is So very great. Dr. Waxein. Yes. Mr. Rogers. I would hope that the Interagency and the Federai Council would assign a little higher peony to these studies. I commend you for your work, “Mr. ecretary. Mr. Mosuzr. No questions. Mr. Casry. No questions. Mr. Lennon. Dr. Wakelin, the ICO has been in existence now around 5 years, has it not? Dr. WaKetin. Yes. : Mr. Lennon. Are there minutes kept of the several meetings of the ICO? Dr. Waxziin. Complete mimutes. Mr. Lennon. Are minutes kept of various panel discussions? Dr. WakE.in. Yes, sir. Mr. Lennon. It would be interesting to the committee in following this matter if we could have inserted in the record of the hearings a summary, not of what transpired or took place at either of the ICO meetings, or the panel meetings, but a summary by calendar years showing the progressive increase in ICO meetings and panel meetings over the past 5 years. I know that was one of the anes we were concerned with early in our hearings—the objective that the committee was seeking. (The following material was subsequently received for the record :) HIGHLIGHTS OF ICO AND PANEL MEETINGS, CALENDAR YEAR 1963 1. ICO MEETINGS March 1: Lengthy consideration was given to many phases of the long-range plan. Also discussed were the fiscal year 1965 national oceanographic program, the Manpower and Training Report, the Ocean Survey Plan, and international programs. April 18: The working group preparing a report on the ICO and ICAS joint sponsorship of air/sea interface research described its preliminary findings. One of the problems encountered by the group in drafting its program was the dissimilarity of approach used by oceanographers and meteorologists. The re- lationship between ICO and the Navy Instrumentation Center was reviewed. Other agenda items included U.S. representation to the forthcoming IOC Bureau meeting and the ICO long-range plan. June 3: Portions of this session were filmed for inclusion in the ICO movie, “Oceanography—Science for Survival.” Items discussed were the fiscal year 1965 budget preview, the executive session with the Subcommittee on Oceanog- raphy of the House Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries, ICO staff augmentation, and a proposed letter of ICO support for the nomination of Marston Sargent to replace Dr. Wooster at UNESCO. The concept of a quarterly report cataloging oceanographic research projects, through the Science Information Exchange of the Smithsonian Institution, was debated. The possibility of a joint NASCO-ICO meeting was considered. August 8: The fiscal year 1965 recommended budget was discussed at length in connection with Bureau of the Budget ceilings imposed upon BCF, Navy, USGS, and USBM. NSF described a $7 million deep coring (ocean floor) pro- gram it may sponsor. The relationship of the National Oceanographic Data Center to the ICO was again considered. Secretary Wakelin suggested that Pee nan nee member agencies provide the extra billets needed to augment e Ss NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 AT September 30: A joint ICO-NASCO meeting examined the long-range national oceanographic program, the fiscal year 1964 NOP, and the NASCO report on “Investment in Oceanographic Research.” November 8: A letter to Dr. Wiesner was approved (with subsequent modifica- tion) wherein ICO recommended the establishment of a staff, to be located at the Department of Commerce, to coordinate the further identification of the unique problems involved and to stimulate the necessary agency activities in the field of air/sea interface research. The roles of deepsea research vehicles (DRY), air/sea interface research, and facilities were discussed in relation to their adequacy in the fiscal year 1965 national program. The proposed revision of current oceanographic vessel legislation was presented by the Coast Guard. Other agenda items included the fiscal year 1965 budget document, marine bi- ology, the forthcoming Hawaii meeting, National Oceanographic Data Center and its Advisory Board, State Department and international programs, and the National Science Foundation canvass of the oceanographic community. Bureau of Commercial Fisheries trade winds zone oceanography program was presented to the ICO for its endorsement as a national program. The matter was referred to the research and surveys panels for evaluation. NASCO’s report on “National Investments in Marine Research and Development” was considered. 2. PANEL MEETINGS (a) Instrumentation, Equipment and Facilities Panel: February 17: The major item of discussion was the fiscal year 1965 budg- et. A report was given on the progress of an ad hoc committee studying the potential ICO use of the Navy Instrumentation Center. March 20: The ad hoc committee reported the need for a national oceano- graphic instrumentation center, assisted by an advisory board, for the design, research and development, calibration, maintenance, and repair of oceano- graphic instruments. The center, the nucleus of which would be the existing Nayy center, would meet the needs of the national oceanographic program. March 27: Agenda items included the fiscal year 1965 budget, ICO-ICAS air/sea interface problems, and the instrumentation center. July 9: The potential need for the Tongue Point, Oreg., facility was de- bated. November 15: The facilities portion of the fiscal year 1965 budget was reviewed, at the request of the OST, and critical needs were pinpointed in ONR, Commerce, NSF, and Interior. (6) International Programs: February 18: U.S. representatives to the forthcoming Moscow meeting of IOC (May 6-8) were selected. U.S. “Declared National Programs,” prepared for the IOC meeting, were discussed. Proposed U.S. representatives were selected for the ICITA meeting in Paris, July 2; IOC Communication Panel meeting, Paris, July 6-12; and the WMO meeting in Geneva in late 1963. July 24: Debate centered around the forthcoming IOC working group meetings on communications. A candidate was proposed for the position of Deputy Director of the UNESCO office of oceanography. Data exchange problems were discussed. August 7: The consultative committee to the IOC was discussed. September 10: Proposed delegates were selected for forthcoming interna- tional meetings, including: IOC, Paris, October 28-31; Kuroshio Studies, Tokyo, October 29-31; Indian Ocean Coordinators Meeting, Paris, January 22-24; Data Exchange Working Group, Paris, January 27-28; and IOC, Paris, June 1964. Other agenda items included data exchange, problems of providing personnel for UNESCO programs, ICITA review, and ‘“De- clared National Programs.” October 1: Position papers prepared for the forthcoming IOC meeting were discussed. (c) Manpower and Training Panel: September 18: Discussion centered around a draft of the questionnaire to be mailed to all members of the Federal and non-Federal oceanographic community, the purpose of which is to accurately assess the current man- power situation. (d@) Oceanographic Research Panel: eed 7: The major agenda item was a discussion of the long-range plan. 48 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 March 13: The Bureau of Commercial Fisheries proposed Trade Winds Zone investigation was considered from the standpoint of possible ICO endorsement as a national program. Other items debated were the fiseal year 1965 program and current effort in buoy component research. A subpanel’s progress on air/sea interface research was heard (this subpanel met on January 30-31, March 6, May 23, July 17, September 18, and Octo- ber 2-3). August 14: The panel reviewed the fiscal year 1965 draft document just prior to its submission to the Office of Science and Technology’s Ad Hoe Panel. The NSF’s proposed $7 million ocean floor long coring program was weighed for possible inclusion in the national program. August 21 A subpanel was chartered for the purpose of analyzing radio- activity research to delineate it for accurate breakdown by ICO research objectives (this subpanel met on October 14). October 4: The fiscal year 1965 program was reappraised in the light of the report of the OST’s Ad Hoe Panel. A subpanel was chartered to study the scientific application of deep-sea research vehicles (DRV) within the framework of the fiscal year 1965 program and the long-range plan (this subpanel met on October 9, 16, 23, and 30 and November 6 and submitted its final report to the panel on November 27). The final report of the subpanel on air/sea interface research was discussed at length. October 24: The fiscal year 1965 research budget was restudied, in view of recent Budget reductions in other functional areas. NASA’s manned orbiting lab (MOL) was explained to the panel by a NASA representative. October 31: A lengthy briefing on Anti-Submarine Warfare Hnyironment Prediction System (ASWHPS) was heard for the purpose of evaluation of the program for possible inclusion in the National Oceanographic Program. (e) Oceanographic Ships Panel: February 1: Fiscal year 1964 shipbuilding plans and ship operating sched- ules were contemplated at length. October 22: Relative priorities in the fiscal year 1965 ship construction program were debated in view of possible adverse action by BuBudget. (f) Ocean Survey Advisory Panel: January 7: Discussion revolved around the requirements and procedures for running an operations research (OR) analysis of the governments’ ocean survey activities. The panel decided to request preliminary OR proposals, from outside government, then seek final proposals from the best responses. January 10-11: The panel explained the 1963 field season government ageney survey plans to four consultants from the non-Federal oceano- graphic community. Detailed season plans for each ship were examined. April 11: A bidders conference was held. April 25: The panel selected six companies, from the preliminary pro- posals, from which it sought final proposals. June 10: The six final proposals were evaluated and the contract for the OR study awarded to Operations Research, Inc., of Silver Spring, Md. September 26: The panel prepared for the forthcoming joint meeting of ICO-NASCO survey panels. Air/sea interface research and the Upper Mantle Project also were discussed. A subpanel was chartered to investi- gate the significance of the biological communities’ needs in terms of the surveys plan. September 27: A joint meeting of ICO-NASCO survey panels pinpointed two major problem areas: the inadequate input to the survey planning mecha- nism from the non-Federal oceanographic community, and the difficulties encountered in publication of data gathered on Federal surveys. Also dis- cussed were the OR analysis and air/sea interface problems. (g) ICO Working Group: May 15: The main item of interest was the Spring preview of the fiscal year 1965 program. Also discussed were progress of the air/sea interface subpanel and ICO staff augmentation. The impact of DSSRG and its rela- tionship to ICO was considered. August 2: The fiscal year 1965 program was restudied prior to submission to the OST’s Ad Hoe Panel. Arrangements were made for panel chairmen to brief the Ad Hoe Panel during the latters’ period of evaluation of the fiscal year 1965 program. October 25: The major issue involved was the method of revising the fiscal year 1965 document to more nearly coincide with the format of the long-range plan, as suggested by the OST Ad Hoe Panel. (h) Data Center Advisory Board. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 49 3. REPORTS I. Completed during calendar year 1963: ICO publication No. 7__.. National Plan for Ocean-Wide Surveys. ICO publication No. 9.-.. Bibliography of Oceanographic Publications. ICO publication No. 10__ Long Range National Oceanographic Plan. ICO publication No. 11__ National Oceanographic Program, fiscal year 1964. ICO publication No. 12_.. Oceanographic Ship Operating Schedules. ICO publication No. 14... University Curricula in Oceanography 1963-64. Aquatic Sciences in the Great Lakes Area. II. In progress: ICO publication No. 8___ A Career in Oceanography. ICO publication No. 15__ National Oceanographic Program, fiscal year 1965. ICO publication No. 16__ Oceanographic Ship Operating Schedules, fiscal year 1965. Mr. Lennon. I am glad to hear you say it is your judgment that the legislation reported out of this full committee, and subsequently to the full committee of the House, meets at present the objectives of the ICO and the Federal Council. You disturb me, however, with your statement, or your remarks at the conclusion of your statement, that the oceanographic effort may be falling off, soto speak. I do not recall the exact terminology you used, but it appeared in the latter part of your statement. What is your suggestion—I guess you are in a better position now since you are leaving the Navy Department to give us an opinion—as to how that might be helped by either this committee, or any individual of the committee, or the Congress ? What is the way to correct that diminution of funds for the oceano- graphic effort ? Dr. Waxeitin. This is the onty committee with which we, as mem- bers of ICO, have been connected which has taken an overal! look at our national program. When I have been before Mr. Mahon’s com- mittee, their interest in oceanography has always been very intense, but as part of the antisubmarine warfare R. & D. program, which is, of course, appropriate to the Department of the Navy. It would help us greatly if we could tell the national oceanographic program story to more committees of the House and the Senate who would look with us at the total program and not at the particular agency for whom an appropriation or a hearing is engaged. Mr. Lennon. Doctor, is it the practice for a department or agency or bureau to bring to the Federal Council, and then subsequently to the ICO, its projected figures for a particular fiscal year in the field of oceanography ? Dr. WAKELIN. Yes. Mr. Lennon. In other words, it goes in their respective requests for a budget, but then they come back to you for your consideration and allocation of the total ? : Dr. Waxetin. No; when this finally goes through the Federal Council for approval, the next stage is a review by the Bureau of the Budget of the submissions of each of the agencies and departments who comprise the program. This is another area in which we have beei most fortunate in having Mr. E. L. Dillon, of the Bureau of the Budget, work with us throughout the entire year, so he knows the whole story of the national program as well as the agencies submitting their requests through their secretaries and directors to the Bureau of the Budget. 50 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 You will recall, Mr. Chairman, that the 1965 program was submitted to the Congress, to the House, and to the Senate, by the President— the long-range program was submitted by Dr. Wiesner. President Johnson submitted on the 19th of March of this year, both to the Sen- ate and to the House, this program in oceanography [indicating the 1965 fiscal year document]. I think you referred to that in your opening remarks. Mr. Lennon. What was that figure ? Dr. WAKELIN. $138 million. Mr. Lennon. That was the figure for the budget ? Dr. WAKELIN. Yes. Mr. Lennon. And that was actually less than the budget figure for fiscal year 1964? Dr. Waxetin. We submitted a program to the Congress in 1964 of $156 million. Mr. Lennon. And for fiscal year 1965 ? Dr. WakeELtIn. $138 million, and fiscal year 1964 was $156 million. Mr. Lennon. You can hardly charge the Congress with the respon- sibility of that cut, can you? Dr. Waxkettn. No, sir; but the $156 million was reduced to about $124 million in congressional hearings. Mr. Lennon. You went to the budget with $175 million ? Dr. Waxetin. That is correct. Mr. Lennon. It was reduced from $175 million by the Bureau of the Budget to $138 million. It was reduced by Congress from $158 million to what ? Dr. WaxKetrn. To $124 million last year. I do not know what it is going to be this year, because all the hearings are not completed, or the actions of committees are not complete. Mr. Lennon. What are the House figures? The House has passed all their appropriation bills except foreign aid. While you are looking that up, the point I am making is, your biggest cut for your oceanographic effort came from the Bureau of the Budget as distinguished from the cuts made by the Congress; is that not so? Dr. Waxettn. Yes, sir. The Bureau of the Budget did look at the whole program as this committee does. The other committees involved in other activities of our whole program do not look at the whole program. Mr. Lennon. As I have indicated, the Bureau of the Budget figure for fiscal year 1965 is $138 million. The House has passed 11 ap- propriation bills and there is only one yet to consider and I wonder how you fared on your $138 million ? Dr. Waxkettn. In the Navy I can say that we sustained a 5-percent cut in research, development, test, and evaluation, across the board. It remains to be determined whether that cut will be 5 percent in oceanography and antisubmarine warfare or whether this will be taken into other areas. We still have to reapportion that cut across the board in research, development, test, and evaluation, in which most of our oceanographic program resides. Mr. ExxtswortH. Will the gentleman yield? Mr. Lennon. Yes. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 51 Mr. Exxswortu. Do I understand that this cut took place here in the House Appropriations Committee, or where ? Dr. WakELIN. The cut we are talking about ? Mr. ExuswortuH. The 5-percent cut. Dr. Waxkein. The cut took place in the House Armed Services Committee (a) authorization and (6) appropriations. Mr. Lennon. Did it take place in the House Armed Services Com- mittee or Subcommittee on Appropriations ? Dr. Waxkettn. The $73 million was removed by authorizaiton and another $8.5 million by the Appropriations Committee. Mr. Lennon. Dr. Wakelin, who appears before the respective au- thorization and then subsequently Subcommittee on Appropriations to defend the budget for oceanography ? Dr. Waxein. I do, for the Navy. Mr. Lennon. For the Navy ? Dr. WAKELIN. Yes, sir. Mr. Lennon. The members of the ICO who appear before the re- spective Subcommittees on Appropriations representing the several departments and agencies and bureaus? Dr. WAKELIN. Yes, sir. Mr. Lennon. You are in a position to present the authorization to the appropriate committee on the total oceanographic effort? Dr. Waxkettn. Which I have done. Mr. Lennon. In spite of that, you say that the $78 million cut in the authorization and subsequently $8.5 million in the appro- priations eee ae Waxetrn. $73 million and $8.5 million; yes, in R.D.T. & E., avy. Mr. Lennon. As Chairman of the ICO, do you know what the experience of the other interested members appearing before the Saag subcommittees on Appropriations and authorizations has een _ Dr. Waxketin. Our estimate now, across the board, as of this morn- ing, is of the order of $7 million cut out of $138 million. The Bureau of Commercial Fisheries sustained, I think, a 10 per- cent cut. There were smaller cuts in Geological Survey and Sport Fisheries. The Science Foundation is undetermined. We do not know the final apportionment within the Science Foundation, how their budget will be figured and their cut. I would estimate that of the Navy program, which we have before you now for discussion, $65.5 million, something of the order of $3 million to $5 million would be cut out of that as a result of the across- pe ord cut that we sustained in the authorization and appropri- ations. Mr. Lennon. Of the House figure, what percentage of the cut of the $138 million is now reflected in the House appropriation bill up to this point? You have almost all of the House appropriation bills passed in the House and, in other words, what of the $138 million that was in the budget is left now as a result of House action ? Dr. WakKELIN. How much is left? About $131 million. Mr. Lennon. That isa $7 million cut ? Dr. WaAKELIN. Yes, sir. 52 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Mr. Lennon. The Bureau of the Budget cut $37 million and the House cut you $7 million, so I think you ought to set the record straight. You were not critical of the House? You spoke disappoint- ingly of the Congress and I think you ought to speak disappoint- ingly of the Bureau of the Budget. Dr. WaKELIN. Yes, sir. Mr. Lennon. Our percentage of the cut is not what we wanted it to be, but it is certainly better than the $37 million cut of the Bureau of the Budget. Dr. Waxetin. We have had many discussions with members of the Bureau of the Budget and we understand they have serious problems in the apportionment of the national funding among many of these national programs, as well as other particular agency programs. Mr. Lennon. Mr. Bauer? Mr. Bavrr. Doctor, there are several questions I will ask you that perhaps will require submission of material for the record that I know you do not have with you now. However, I think for the record it would be very helpful for the committee if you would describe this new Naval Institute of Oceanol- ogy asit is now being formed. if you cannot do that, perhaps the admiral can tell us the purpose. Dr. Waxetin. Mr. Bauer, the purpose generally is to combine the research programs of the Office of Naval Research, principally those in the area of geophysics under the direction of Dr. Arthur Maxwell, which concerns itself primarily with educational and research institu- tions under contract to the Navy with part of the oceanographic pro- gram conducted by Admiral Knoll’s group in the Naval Oceano- eraphic Division (OPNAU). The reason for combining these is to get a closer association of our in-house naval research on oceanogr aphy as conducted by the Oceano- graphic Office with those institutions which are under contract for research in this field to the Office of Naval Research. The idea of the Tnstitute of Oceanology was to coordinate better by locating in one place the two parts of the program. Perhaps if Admiral Knoll does testify before the committee he would like to amplify these statements. In general, we are trying to combine the in-house and contract work under one colocated group, better to take advantage of their mutual interests in the field of oceanography. Mr. Baver. In other words, am I correct in assuming that you would also include some features of aerology ? Dr. Waxettn. Yes, sir; as well as a considerable part of the pro- gram in the air-sea field. This would be included in the Institute of Oceanology. Mr. Bauer. It would be correct to say that this is an approach to the study of the entire environment of the ocean; is that correct ? Dr. Waxetin. This is an approach toward the consolidation of pro- grams in the Navy, both with respect to meteorology and oceano- raphy ; yes, sir. Mr. Baur. You contemplate including hydrobiolegy? - Dr. Waxetin. We have not specifically included that in Dr. Max- swell’s ONR plans. I would certainly think it should be considered a sart of this at a later time. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 5; Mr. Bauer. What is the present status of security classification of ocean surveys ? Dr. Waxetin. I’m sorry I do not have that information with me. I will be happy to send it to you as soon as I return to my office. Mr. Bauer. Doctor, while you gather that information, would you also supply for the record a résumé on in-house versus sponsored oceanographic research ? Dr. Waxetin. I will be happy to include this résumé along with the other request. (The following information was subsequently received for the record :) PAST AND PRESENT STATUS OF SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF OCEANIC SOUNDINGS Prior to 1942 all oceanic soundings were incorporated on unclassified charts, and sent to the International Hydrographic Bureau. The need for protection of ship movements, plus protection of data which could be used by enemy submarines, resulted in the classification of oceanic soundings, during the war years. In February 1951 the classification of these secret and confidential soundings was reduced to restricted. When the restricted category was eliminated in 1952, these soundings were upgraded to confidential. Since then, restrictions have been progressively relaxed. In 1958, soundings in the Antarctic, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean were declassified. In other areas, only depths greater than 300 fathoms were classified. In 1959, those in the Southern Hemisphere south of latitude 30° south were additionally declassi- fied. In mid-1959, the National Academy of Sciences Committee on Oceanography recommended that ‘all oceanographic information, including oceanie soundings and other survey information be unclassified, with the exception of certain data collected in strategic regions or by clandestine means.” This was amplified to mean that soundings taken with no better than celestial or loran A accuracy, or on sounding lines spaced more than 10 miles apart, would be unclassified. Also to be unclassified were all detailed surveys made by the PDR (precision depth recorder), all positions of sea-mounts, all bathymetric charts at scales smaller than 1 :2,000,000, all soundings south of 20° south latitude, and the whole Indian Ocean. The Navy in early 1960 concurred in part with the NASCO group recommenda- tions, and it was decided that soundings spaced closer than 10 miles, precisely positioned (loran C or equivalent) would be classified. The Hydrographer was directed to sanitize such data for release at 10-mile spacing. In early 1962 this was further relaxed to classify only precision soundings at closer than 5-mile line interval. This resulted in a declassification of a large quantity of the stock of classified soundings. These ground-rules are still in force. This policy is considered adequate and reasonable for the present, but is certainly not unchangeable. It has, as noted in the foregoing, been arrived at through an evolutionary process, and this will doubtless continue. It is the Navy’s policy to cooperate in every way with other agencies and scientists who desire data, consistent with the current dictates of military security. BALANCE OF OCEANOGRAPHIC RESEARCH EFFORT IN THE UNITED STATES During the formative years (fiscal years 1960-63) of the national oceano- graphic program, the Interagency Committee on Oceanography (ICO) was ad- vised by the National Academy of Sciences, through its committee on oceanog- raphy (NASCO),* that a productive national program of oceanography re- quired, more than any other element, a significant growth in its basic research sector. This research need referred primarily to the university laboratories, who felt that: (a) that they had achieved a potential of facilities which would allow modest acceleration in their research effort: (0) that the basic knowledge, which had been acquired by that time, indicated numerous and exciting possibil- ities for further good and productive research: and (c) that from all points of 1 National Academy of Sciences publication, Oceanography, 1960-70. 54 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 view of our national interest. it was well past the time when this Nation could and should afford to step up its program of oceanographic research, as a matter of practical exploitation. The ICO responded by paying particular attention to encouragement of basic research in preparation of its annual national programs; primarily through the mechanisms of the Office of Naval Research, which doubled its oceanographic research support from 1960 to 1964, and the National Science Foundation, which tripled its research support during the same period. Not only were the recog- nized centers of oceanographic research in the United States considerably ag- grandized but at least half a dozen new laboratories were established in the country. In addition, a number of small colleges instituted courses in oceanog- raphy and undertook a small degree of productive research with partial Govern- ment support. This growth was extremely encouraging not only to its practitioners, but to the Government scientific administrators who play such a large part in its at- tainment. However, it is possible that some balance was lost in this drive for funding since a special panel of experts later convened by the assistant to the President for Science and Technology reported that the Federal inhouse research program appeared to be somewhat undernourished by comparison. This obser- vation may have resulted from a comparison of program budget data for the period 1960 to 1965. In 1960, research supported by Federal Government grants and contracts to academie and industrial laboratories amounted to about $17 million: at the same time the aggregate effort mounted by Government labora- tories amounted to some $10 million. Although at first glance this would seem to favor the private laboratories, the large number of academic and industrial laboratories should be recognized. as compared to Federal laboratories prosecut- ing oceanographic projects. In 1965 funds for sponsored research in academic and industrial laboratories amount to approximately $40 million whereas inhouse research is in the neighborhood of $29 million. Within the Federal laboratories, the largest users of research funds are the Oceanographic Office of the Navy ($5 million), and the complexes of fisheries research laboratories (about $12 million), and Navy laboratories (about $5 mil- lion). Although there are exceptions to the rule, it may generally be assumed that funds given to university laboratories support mainly basic research while Federal laboratories are engaged in projects of application to the mission of the parent agency. During the formative years of the national oceanographic pro- gram, almost no research funds passed from the Government to industry except in an indirect manner (i.e.. design and fabrication of instruments for univer- sity research contractors, ete.). However, in fiscal year 1965 nearly $2 million is scheduled for industry on direct Federal contract for research excluding the Mohole project. At the same time an increasingly large share of the research (including instrumentation design) budget passes indirectly to industry through Federal and non-Federal laboratories. It is estimated that at the present time industry receives over $10 million in research and instrumentation contracts annually—a healthy trend. Mr. Baver. Thank you, sir. Mr. Lennon. Thank you, Dr. Wakelin. We appreciate your attendance here this morning and we certainly wish you well and regret that you will not be back in your capacity as the head of ICO. Our only hope is that your successor will be as dedicated, knowledgeable, and interested as you have demonstrated over the years. Dr. Waxetrn. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Lennon. It is indicated here that our next witness is Mr. Don- ald L. McKernan, Chairman, Interagency Committee on Oceanog- raphy, Panel on Instrumentation and Facilities. We have had him here before us many times and I might say he wears a number of hats. We are glad to have him here again in this official capacity. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 55 STATEMENT OF DONALD L. McCKERNAN, CHAIRMAN, INTERAGENCY COMMITTEE ON OCEANOGRAPHY, INSTRUMENTATION, EQUIP- MENT, AND FACILITIES PANEL Mr. McKernan. Mr. Chairman, I greatly appreciate the honor today of appearing before you as a member of the Interagency Com- mittee on Oceanography and as its Chairman on Instrumentation and Facilities. Betore proceeding with my remarks, Mr. Chairman, I want to take this opportunity on behalf of the Department of the Interior to echo the sentiments expressed by a number of members of this committee for the wonderful work of, and the fine opportunity it has been for us in the Department to work with a public spirited citizen such as Secretary Wakelin. We in the Department think it is going to be difficult for our Gov- ernment to replace a man of his dedication and foresight. We think his contribution to the Nation is going to be recognized, perhaps in future years, even more than it is today. It has been a privilege for me to work with him and observe his dedication and understanding of the problems of oceanography as they relate to our Department. This has been greatly appreciated by the Secretary of the Depart- ment of the Interior and those of us in the Department who have been working with him. Mr. Chairman, I have a statement of several pages in length but in order to save time you might want to put the statement in the record and allow me to comment briefly on my impressions of the progress and the problems remaining in the general field of coordinating the instrumentation work of the ICO. tam at your disposal, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Lennon. Mr. McKernan, we have heard your off-the-cuff dis- cussions before and I think perhaps it would be as effective and as in- formative if you did just that with the understanding you can go through your prepared statement and use any part of it you would like. However, you can put the full statement in at the conclusion of your remarks. Mr. McKernan. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Before starting, I would like to refer the committee to page 4 of my statement. The present membership of the committee is indi- cated there. I am very fortunate, Mr. Chairman, in having a number of these people, or their alternates, present with me today so that, if the com- mittee wishes to ask more specific questions requiring intimate techni- cal knowledge of the field of instrumentation, I am sure there are people in the room who can do a creditable job in answering such questions. Mr. Chairman, as I see the problems of instrumentation, they are something like this: All of us in the Interagency Committee on Ocean- ography are deeply aware of the costs of putting ships to sea. These are expensive platforms and they are becoming most costly every year. 56 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 We recognize that this means that we must improve our techniques for measuring the properties of the ocean and increase our effective- ness in understanding the sea, if we are going to spend the funds al- lotted us in the most efficient manner. Therefore, this whole matter of instrumentation and of mechaniz- ing the instruments aboard ship, and of getting the most accurate measurements possible for the greatest number of scientists in various disciplines, is of the utmost importance. Essentially then, the Panel on Instrumentation and Facilities is devoted to the task of (1) attempting to recognize the preblems of instrumentation which occur in measuring various physical, chemical, and biological properties of the sea and (2) seemg how we can resolve these problems and make the necessary measurements most effectively and with increasing efficiency. As I see the task of this Panel, it is essentially to pinpoint these problems and to try to provide some leadership and stimulus in finding solutions for them. The Panel has devoted a good deal of time to this and I would suppose that in the matter of time each of us associated with the In- strumentation and Facilities Panel as given a significant amount of his daily effort to the task. I have been fortunate in having one or two specialists on instrumentation within the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries who have put in about one-half of their time on instrumenta- tion and associated ICO duties. The Panel has attempted to find out what each agency is doing in the field of instrumentation research in order that we do not duplicate oneanother. In the field of instrumentation, the matter of duplication of effort is perhaps more serious or could be more serious than in most other areas. For example, many marine scientists want to measure temperature accurately and record temperature measurements along with a number of other parameters in the ocean. Therefore, it is very important that good communication, especially between these various scientists, be achieved. We have attempted to do that and in this field I think we have achieved considerable success, Mr. Chairman. We have tried to encourage the cooperation and coordination of work in various fields, such as the development of buoys which can monitor various properties in the ocean. We have worked very closely with the National Academy of Science Committee on Oceanography in studying particular instrumentation problems. As I believe was mentioned in response to a question asked of Dr. Wakelin just before I came on the stand, Mr. Chairman, we have been fortunate in having some of the Nation’s best instrument people as advisers on our Panel. Mr. Allyn Vine of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution is a recognized authority in this field. He has been an adviser on our Panel and attends a considerable proportion of our Panel meetings. He consistently has been available when we have special problems. Tam sure that the committee understands from the testimony of the two preceding witnesses that there are many problems remaining and that coordination is not completely effective and probably never will be, but from my point of view as a member of the ICO, in addition to being Chairman of this very important Panel, our accomplishments are significant and of importance to the Nation. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 57 Even so, there has arisen from our meetings and from our increased communications with one another an awareness of additional and un- solved problems in the area of review and coordination of instrumenta- tion research and development especially. For example, the matter Mr. Rogers mentioned about choosing priorities and critically reviewing each Department’s instrumentation and facilities programs. I think it would be a mistake for us to come before this committee and indicate that we have accomplished the ultimate in striking priorities or critically reviewing programs. I think all of us and all of the panels are still struggling mightily with the problem of both reviews and priorities. However, as a first step, we have improved communications between departments and labora- tories in the field. For example, Mr. Chairman, in the case of instruments, many of us feel, and in fact perhaps all of us feel, that greater interagency co- ordination in standardization and calibration of instruments is needed, first on a national scale and ultimately, [ might add, on an interna- tional scale. I could give as an example the Indian Ocean where ships of many nations have been engaged in physical and biological oceanographical research. If the measurements they obtain are going to be useful in plotting physical and biological properties of the Indian Ocean and studying the way these currents affect the living organisms of the ocean, obviously the instruments used to take these measurements must be calibrated one with another. Ii good calibration or standardization of measurements is not achieved, then it is very difficult to combine the data from the ships of various nations. Therefore, this matter of inter-calibration and standardization of equipment and methods is of extreme importance in multiship operations. We have not been totally successful, even in our country, in this regard, but I would offer for the committee that we have been so much more successful than we ever have been in the past that our progress is good. But, it is our aim to go a good deal further in the field of standardization and calibration of instruments. I believe planning for future instrumentation and facilities research and development has progressed very well. We have plans developed, not only for this year and next year, but tentative plans for several years. These are not firm, hard plans, yet, Mr. Chairman, but on the whole they show interest by all agencies engaged in ocean research to get together and to think about problems of instrumentation and fac- ilities in the future. f course, we are being pressed to do the job better by current limitations of our budget. I am sure that the efforts will stimulate us to even greater efforts. I mentioned the matter of improved communications as being one of the greatest accomplishments of our panel on instrumentation, and I think other panel chairmen would say the same thing in other fields of oceanography. The matter of knowing what the Navy and the Coast Guard plus various private and university laboratories are doing in the field of instrumentation is of the utmost importance and She Oe time and effort of highly skilled scientists in all agencies involved. 5S NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 The matter of stimulating effort in this field and of providing the kind of leadership necessary to encourage cooperation in this par- ticular field has not been perfectly worked out yet. J am somewhat dissatisfied with my own efforts in this regard and I believe that other members in my panel feel the same way. This comes about because of the compromises we must make between panel duties on one hand and the duties of our regular positions on the other. Even so, with all these limitations, it seems to me that the Interagency Committee on Oceanography and its panels and advisory groups of university and industrial scientists provide about the best mechanism I can think of for producing the kind of leadership, planning, and cooperation Government and scientists must put forward in this general field of instrumentation and facilities. The whole problem of our national effort in instrumentation and facilities, in my view, is not going ahead as fast as I would hke to see it, nor as fast as we had planned. Not all of this is due to the lag in the budgetary process. Part of it is due, perhaps, to the high goals we set for ourselves and part of it is due, perhaps, to the other urgent prob- lems of the day that have arisen as we have moved into the field. Even so, it seems to me that the progress in the field of instrumentation has been rather remarkable in the last 5 years. Not all of this, of course, is due to the Interagency Committee on Oceanography and its work, but I believe that it can take credit for a good deal of the interest in both industry and in Government and the coordination between industry and Government, as well as within Government, that has occurred. In the future, Mr. Chairman, there will be a challenge for marine scientists everywhere, and especially for those in our own country, to keep our eminence in the field of marine instrumentation. There is also a challenge in developing new instruments to take advantage of the fundamental knowledge of the sea in order to mine the seas, both for minerals and for living resources. There needs to be renewed emphasis on the ocean-engineering phase of our national ocean- ography program in the very near future. This appears to be the next step in our national effort. We have been giving some thought to the problems of ocean engi- neering. Many of us are planning on a small scale to move into this particular field of especially applying the fundamental knowledge we are gaining of the world ocean to the problems of practical importance in defense, fishing, mining, commerce, and weather to a greater extent than in the past. Mr. Chairman, I very briefly have given you my general impression of our progress since I last appeared before you in the field of instru- mentation and facilities and I will be very pleased to answer questions on either my brief statement or on my written testimony. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Lennon. Thank you, Mr. McKernan. Gentlemen of the committee, Mr. McKernan, as you all know, is from the Bureau of Fisheries and I hope all of you will take the time to read his fine statement in its entirety. Without objection, your prepared statement will be placed in the record immediately following your testimony. Mr. McKernan. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Lennon. Are there any questions, Mr. Casey ? NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 59 Mr. Casey. Yes, Mr. Chairman. I notice the primary purpose, or one of the primary purposes, you mention in your statement is the standardization of equipment, cali- bration, and so forth, as well as better methods of testing calibration. Tn this exchange, you also mentioned international exchange of infor- mation. You mentioned briefly proposed instrumentation is a classi- fied file limited to Government personnel only. Do we have any developments that are considered of such impor- tance to the national defense that they should be highly classified ? Mr. McKernan. Mr. Casey, there is a type of work, of course, that is done by the Navy, of a classified nature which involves defense aspects of oceanography. This is not at the present time under the purview of the Interagency Committee on Oceanography. Our ex- change of information and exchange of calibrated instruments are those of an unclassified nature. We benefit from these exchanges as well as other countries. It is true that the exchange of information is not equal at the present time among all countries, but there is developing quite an active ex- change of information between ourselves and other countries, including the United States and the U.S.S.R. This is of an unclassified nature in respect to instruments and facilities in our case and also includes unclassified data. Mr. Casry. I notice we have a joint project with other nations, including the U.S.S.R. in the Indian Ocean. I presume the objectives that are being pursued there and the instrumentation that is bein developed in conjunction there is something that is of general use to peacetime purposes ? Mr. McKernan. In my own field of fisheries, there is little known about the fisheries of the Indian Ocean. Interestingly enough, there is a great interest by the U.S. fishing companies in the fishery re- sources of the Indian Ocean. There are several major U.S. companies that are establishing stations in the Indian Ocean at the present time and some of these are using data which is coming out of the Indian Ocean expedition. By the way, the Russian scientists have done a great deal of fishery sone there, and we are still trying to pry data loose from them on this. Mr. Casry. I was going to ask you that. There has been a lot in the papers on that and they have developed this possibly more highly than we have in the commercial fisheries field, including instrumenta- tion of the ships they have where they make their catch and do every- thing to it they possibly can do on shore, so that when they come in, some of it is already canned and some of it is being prepared for fertilizer as well as edible products. Have you had an opportunity to review any of this instrumentation ? Mr. McKernan. Yes, we have had an opportunity to see some of this. We have had a good opportunity to discuss this matter with Russian scientists and in several areas of the world we are exchanging information rather completely with them on these particular matters. For example, there has been an international expedition in the tropi- cal Atlantic, and the Soviet Union and the United States, as well as other countries, have rather freely exchanged fisheries and hydro- graphic information that has been collected on this particular pro- 60 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 gram. It has been a rather successful international effort. It may lead to additional successful efforts because I think it has reduced suspicion and so forth among many nations. It is pretty obvious to me that we cannot afford to do everything that needs to be done everywhere. If we can encourage other nations who are also interested in the sea for various purposes to carry on part of these particular studies, and then ailow us to examine their data, and if we are smart enough and sharp enough we will use this to our advantage, both for our national defense and, in my own case, for utilizing the resources of the sea and improving the standing of our commercial fishing industry. Mr. Casry. Do we have any national goal in oceanography such as we had in the space program ? Mr. McKernan. Yes; these have been generally spelled out, Mr. Casey, in our published programs. In our national oceanographic programs of various kinds, we have rather clearly spelled out the goals of our country in oceanography. Mr. Casry. Do we have any of the kind of thing that has caught the public fancy, such as the space program has? As you well know, the space program could not begin to get the support it now has unless it caught the public fancy as it did with its boldness in new explora- tion and adventure as well as the defense aspects and the scientific aspects. Ofcourse, NASA is supposed to be purely a peacetime effort, purely for scientific knowledge and to broaden man’s horizon, but by the same token we all know it has a very definite place in defense. Of course, the Defense Department is in this to a great extent and the manned orbital laboratory is going to be a defense project or a NASA project. Mr. McKernan. We think the objectives in oceanography are the most exciting objectives in any of the fields in which our Government is carrying out research and development. We put this in various forms in our publications on oceanography, such as the long-range oceanographic program from 1963 to 1972. This, briefly stated, is the national goal: to comprehend the world ocean, its boundaries, its properties, and processes, and to exploit this comprehension in the public interest and for the enhancement of our security, culture, national posture, and our economic growth. Mr. Casry. Do you have any films or anything like that other than this publication? In other words, I am interested in trying to get some real stimulus behind this program because I think it is that important. If really do. : Mr. McKernan. I share with all of our committee members in being very pleased at your interest. Yes, we do have some films and we have developed film strips. There is a film that was mentioned, I believe, by Secretary Wakelin that we would like to show if the committee has time before it adjourns this hearing. I think it is a very good one. Mr. Casny. There are 435 men who occupy seats here and who get called on for speeches before civic clubs, ladies’ clubs, and business groups and I think if you would let them know that.some of those films are available, there might be a little free publicity. Mr. McKernan. I think that is a very good idea and I am sure that those of us on the committee, and perhaps Mr. Abel will take this advice to heart, Mr. Casey. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 61 Mr. Cassy. Thank you. Mr. Lennon. Mr. Pelly ? Mr. Peniy. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Lennon. Off the record a minute. ( Discussion off the record.) Mr. Petiy. Mr. Chairman, I will ask my question afterward be- cause it deals more with an item of personal interest in fisheries. Mr. Lennon. He will be around. Thank you, Mr. Pelly. That is very helpful. Mr. Keith? Mr. Kerry. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. McKernan, I am interested in your reference to more shore- based facilities. I believe you made a recommendation for more of these on page 16 of your testimony / Mr. McKernan. Yes, sir. Mr. Kerr. You say— « * * Hxisting oceanographic centers need to be expanded so as to extend the capabilities of their personnel. Large new marine technological institutes specializing in the various engineering aspects need to be established. An example of such a base is the proposed Interior Oceanographic Base at Tiburon, Calif., now occupied by skeleton planning groups from three agencies. Hmphasis here will be in scientific research, engineering research, surveys, and monitoring. Logistics, data handling, monitoring, and instrumentation will also be under- taken. I am a little concerned about your survey in this booklet headed “University Curriculum.” There is a tremendous amount of educa- tional talent available to oceanographers throughout the Jength and breadth of this country. It would seem to me that since these institu- tions are meagerly funded at the moment, to start another oceano- graphic base might just spread even thinner the funds available. Perhaps further development of such places as Scripps, Woods Hole, and the University of Rhode Island, American University, and the University of Washington would be better. At any rate, I would like to have you speak for just a moment, if you would, on why we need to have an entirely new base when we have existing facilities that perhaps could be further strengthened ? Mr. McKernan. Of course, this matter of strengthening our exist- ing facilities is a matter of concern to us with the emphasis now on economy. We are not proposing an immediate implementation. of this particular plan. This isan example, ina way, of our dream. We see the need for larger centers very near the ocean that can handle certain kinds of instruments and certain kinds of data very efficiently. For example, one of the plans we had for this particular base—in- cidentally, it is a Navy base, a part of which, at least, has practically been turned over now and which we are simply operating with a skele- ton stafi—we can see information about the ocean in the eastern Pacific or eventually throughout the entire Pacific being put into com- puters and used in predicting ocean weather as well as the atmospheric weather on the west coast of our United States much more accurately, from the Aleutian Islands, perhaps south to the Equator. We have done this on an experimental basis at the present time and we find that there are techniques becoming available to us which show tremendous promise for improving the predictability of fish catches and concentrations of fish along our coasts as well as the 35—-377— 64— — 5 62 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 ability for better weather prediction, long-range weather prediction, and such things. Mr. Kurrn. Thank you, Mr. McKernan. I will pursue this later. What I am primarily concerned about is the possibility of duplica- tion, a thinning of our effort, a vitiating of our effort, and there- fore, the ability to handle the problem. Mr. McKernan. Weare considering this, Mr. Keith. We certainly will keep this in mind. Mr. Kerry. Thank you. Mr. Lennon. I might say, Mr. Keith, as Chairman of that par- ticular panel on Facilities, Equipment, and Instrumentation, Mr. Mc- Kernan’s prime responsibility is to see that there is no duplication in any of these fields. Mr. Bauer. In your statement on page 18 you mentioned that we have a prototype of a national center for testing, calibration, and standardization of oceanographic instruments in the Navy Oceano- graphic Instrumentation Center. What are the current plans of your Panel with respect to the development of a national center that you have mentioned ? Mr. McKernan. It is the Panel’s intention to establish a National Instrumentation Center. The plan is as follows: (1) Study the operation of the present Naval Oceanographic In- strumentation Center and the degree to which it meets the needs of other agencies. (2) Establish a National Oceanographic Instrumentation Coor- dination Unit, primarily an information exchange office, with the Navy Instrumentation Center providing instrumentation services on a national level. (8) With increased experience and, if agreement among agencies can be obtained, expand the Navy Center so that it is truly national in character. (4) If such agreement cannot be reached, request funds to estab- lish a separate national center under the auspices of the Interagency Committee on Oceanography. It is not intended that individual agencies ever be prevented from developing specialized instrumentation capabilities to meet particular mission requirements. The operational procedures of the Coordinat- ing Unit are being developed in the form of the information ex- change system described on pages 6 and 14 of my prepared statement. Mr. Bauer. It has been of concern to this committee for some years, as you know, as to the method for utilizing ships-of-opportunity, and by that I mean vessels that are under the American flag sailing the high seas of the world. Does the Panel have any plans for complet- ing a suit capable of instrumenting these ships-of-opportunity ? Mr. McKernan. Yes, the Panel is preparing instruments which can be used on ships-of-opportunity. The problem here is twofold. The first task is to provide instruments designed to require very little time, no special skill, and no alternation of vessel operation; they must also provide data of unquestionable quality. The second is to insure that the oceanographic centers ashore are capable and organized to receive and handle the data so gathered; some work on the design and programing of the equipment of their data centers is required. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 63 The Panel plans to use indicating rather than recording devices until automatic position indicating equipment is available. It is hoped that these will come with the advent of the data relaying satel- lites which may be operational by 1970. At that time the satellites will interrogate the shipboard recorders and relay the ship’s position and observed data back to the data center. The mstrument suit for ships-of-opportunity was described on pages 405 and 406 of the “Pro- ceedings of the Government-Industry Oceanographic Instrumenta- tion Symposium.” Our progress to date in obtaining this instrumen- tation has been as follows: Item 3. Electronic bathythermograph with associated winch-wire boom-recorder-readout assembly: It has been found that the industry funded and developed expendable bathythermograph mentioned on pages 10 and 11 of my prepared statement may do the job as well and require far less shipboard equipment and skill. Item 4. An automatic recording sea-surface temperature probe: A standard sea-surface temperature indicator is being developed through the cooperative efforts of the Naval Oceanographic Office, Coast Guard, Weather Bureau, and Bureau of Commercial Fisheries. Data from this device will be entered into the quartermaster’s logbook along with the ship’s position and pertinent meteorological data. Operational evaluations are underway now and more are contemplated in the next fiscal year. Item 5. Meteorological instruments: The Weather Bureau already has in use on ships-of-oppertunity the following instruments: (a) Wind direction and velocity indicators (still in limited use). (6) Barographs or barometers. (c) Air temperature indicators. (dz) Various instruments for measuring the moisture content of the air. The other four devices listed in the proceedings; that is (1) the sounding set, (2) the precision depth or graphic recorder, (6) the towed magnetometer, and (7) the shipboard wave height measuring or recording device are not yet in stages applicable to ships-of-cppor- tunity. Work on these four devices is being held in abeyance until other work is completed. The Naval Oceanographic Office is developing instrument suits for oceanographic survey vessels and for the ship- board oceanographic synoptic observational networks. It is hoped that the instruments developed for these other uses may lead to devices applicable to ships-of-opportunity. Progress depends on individual agency priority and on the availability of funds. Mr. Lennon. Thank you very much, Mr. McKernan, for your presentation. Mr. McKernan. Thank you. (Ma. McKernan’s prepared statement follows :) STATEMENT OF Donatp L. McKERNAN, CHAIRMAN, INTERAGENCY COMMITTEE ON OCEANOGRAPHY, INSTRUMENTATION, EQUIPMENT, AND- FACILITIES PANEL Mr. Chairman and members of the subcommittee, I am very happy to have the opportunity to describe the progress the Instrumentation, Hquipment, and Facili- ties Panel has made since our meeting 2 years ago. The principal objectives of this Panel are (1) To give impetus to the development of instruments and instru- ment ssytems for oceanographic research and surveys, (2) to encourage coopera- 64 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 tion and coordination in these areas by the entire oceanographie community, and (3) to coordinate the development of shoreside facilities. The investment in oceanographic instrumentation has grown substantially in recent years. You might ask, ‘Why do we require this new equipment and what are we doing with it?’ The present-day scientists requires new and sophisticated instruments to determine the nature of the seas and their boundaries, to eonduct work on and in the seas and to exploit them more effectively. For his studies the scientist needs samples of the water, the bottom, and marine life. He re- quires new instruments to investigate special phenomena, such as weather, earth- quakes, and tsunamis, and the effects of storms on our shores. An understand- ing of these will lead to a keener comprehension of the forces at work on our planet, improved prediction and warning networks, and eventually, possibly, some control. The latter will not be easy to accomplish. Military, construction, and other engineers are using a great variety of new instruments in an immedi- ately practical way to defend our shores and shipping lanes, to build bridges, worldwide cable networks, tunnels, and to drill oil wells, to fish, navigate, sal- vage, search, and rescue, to secure our coasts from erosion, and to protect life and property against the sea. It is often necessary to wrestle heavy gear and equipment over the side, in all types of weather, sometimes at the risk of the instruments, and indeed of life and limb. So they must be exceedingly durable and able to withstand such hazards. Many times the available equipment cannot measure as precisely as desired, or its reliability cannot be depended upon. For example, scientists of the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries compared tuna food caught in a net to that found in the tuna stomachs. They found little correlation between what the tuna has eaten and what the net has collected. Why? Improper sampling tech- niques may have been used—the tuna food organisms can avoid the net. More accurate plankton nets and midwater trawls must be designed, and this is being done. A geologist samples the bottom of the ocean. He brings up a few pounds of material containing a valuable mineral. How representative is this sample of that section of the bottom? At present the answer is expensive to obtain. We had difficulty in locating the Thresher which sank in deep water. Navy’s search and rescue operations require an entirely new and specialized field of instrumentation. The Public Health Service, concerned with pollution, must detect and measure very dilute amounts of pollutants, such as pesticides and radioactive materials. This requires very exact methods and specialized instru- mentation. The master of a passenger vessel wants to make the quickest and safest pas- sage possible. Which route would be optimum for avoiding adverse currents, sudden storms, or heavy seas? We must have instruments that will give us instantaneous observations of weather and ocean conditions for large areas of the oceans. Both reports and predictions are necessary. (These are just a few of the reasons why oceanographers go to sea, and why they need instruments. The immediate need for accurate and reliable instru- ments is great. Improved instruments that require less maintenance, less at- tention, and perform several operations at the same time, will release scientists from routine tasks and make their hours more productive. Automation has barely come to oceanographic instrument design. These are some of the problems that have occupied us, Mr. Chairman. I hope to tell you briefly some of the ways we have gone about solving them, what we’ve accomplished, and what we’re planning for the future. PANEL MEMBERSHIP All Government departments and agencies having an interest in oceanographic instrumentation are represented on this Panel. Liaison with non-Federal scien- tists is maintained through observers from the National Academy of Sciences’ Committee on Oceanography. In general, the Panel members are the top instru- ment specialists of their organization. For the record, present membership of the ICO Instrumentation, Hquipment, and Facilities Panel is as follows: Army: Coastal Engineering Research Center, observer, Leo C. Williams. Atomic Hnergy Commission, Arnold B. Joseph; alternate, Dr. John N. Wolfe. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PRUGRAM—1965 65 Commerce: U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey, Anthony J. Goodheart; alternate Theodore V. Ryan. Bureau of Standards, observer, Mr. Joshua Stern. Health, Education, and Welfare: Public Health Service, Dr. James L. Verber; alternate, Dr. Allen Hirsch. Interagency Committee on Oceanography, observer, Mr. Robert B. Abel. Interior: Bureau of Commercial Fisheries, Donald L. McKernan, Chairman; alternate, Dr. Julius Rockwell, Jr. National Academy of Sciences, Committee on Oceanography: observer, Allyn C. Vine ; alternate, Richard C. Vetter. National Oceanographic Data Center: observer, Dr. Woodrow C. Jacobs. National Science Foundation: Dr. Richard G. Bader. Office of Naval Research, Feenan D. Jennings. Navy Oceanographic Office, Gilbert Jaffe, alternate, Capt. T. K. Treadwell. Smithsonian Institution: observer, Dr. H. A. Fehlmann. Treasury : U.S. Coast Guard, Lt. Comdr. Richard M. Morse. WAYS OF ACCOMPLISHING OBJECTIVES During the past 2 years a formal procedure for an annual review of the in- strumentation and facilities section of the national oceanographic program has been inaugurated. We have found this annual process to be not only a rather good program review, but also an excellent mechanism for information exchange and coordination among Panel members. Another important means of coordination is accomplished at Panel meetings when experts are invited to brief the Panel on subjects of general interest. Recently a group from NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center explained one method by which data could be relayed from ocean platforms back to data centers via satellites. Still another method is through small ad hoc working groups assigned to study special aspects of instrumentation and report to the Panel at intervals. One recently appointed group is gathering information on buoys, another on data collecting satellites, a third is determining how ocean engineering is serving and can better serve the oceanographic community. Because of recent progress and developments, some emphasis has been directed to providing and encouraging an information exchange system to keep us in- formed of accomplishments, progress, and plans in oceanographic instrumenta- tion and facilities. Following are projects of various Panel members to facili- tate information exchange and coordination: (a) Descriptions of oceanographic instruments that have been made and used (Encyclopedia of Oceanographic Instruments). (b) A file of specifications of oceanographic instruments (those that have been made). (c) Descriptions of oceanographic instruments that are being developed (in- house and contracted). (d) Proposals to develop oceanographic instruments (a privileged file for Federal use only). (e) Descriptions of instrument needs. (f) List of existing noncommercial marine science laboratories. (g) List of planned noncommercial marine science laboratories. ACCOMPLISHMENTS OF THE PANEL Two years ago, during my testimony before this subcommittee, mention was made of the Government-Industry Oceanographic Instrumentation Symposium held in August of 1961. Since that time the proceedings of this symposium have been published and are for sale. Copies are available here for the members of this subcommittee. Nearly all of the general concepts and principles set forth in this publication are still current as are most of the data. Staff members have found the proceedings a useful medium for introducing a company to oceanographic instrumentation. Partly as a result of this and partly as a result of the Panel’s contacts with industry, some firms have aggres- a exploited their oceanographic capabilities, and are now working in this eld. 66 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 The proposal and capability file estabiished for the Panel by the National Oceanographic Data Center has been increasing steadily in size. Lists of titles of proposals in this privileged file are distributed semiannually to Panel members and to others in the Federal Government who need this information. The file has recently been transferred to the Navy Oceanographic Instrumentation Cen- ter. In the future a copy of each proposal sent to the Federal Government on oceanographic instrumentation will be forwarded to that office. This file, now comprising some 3800-odd proposals, provides valuable source information for Federal administrators and engineers who are embarking on new programs, and who heed to locate companies with specific and highly spe- cialized capabilities. As it now exists, this file is quite useful; when it is fully implemented it will be a major factor in reducing redundancy in the development of oceanographic instruments and will provide a coordinated and easily accessible source of information on the vast array of engineering skill and potential of American industry. The exchange of useful oceanographic data between agencies and nations in our international programs is dependent upon the standardization of equipment. The Navy Oceanographic Instrumentation Center has an established procedure for testing and calibrating precision deep sea reversing thermometers and is performing this service for its own scientists and those of the Bureau of Com- mnercial Fisheries, Coast and Geodetic Survey, Coast Guard, Naval Research Laboratory, and the Lamont Geological Observatory (Columbia University). The calibration of salinometers is now being undertaken for the Coast Guard. The Navy Oceanographic Office’s instrument specifications are being used by other agencies for procurement purposes. The ever-increasing number of instances of cooperation and integration of efforts by member agencies is considered a significant accomplishment of this Panel. Some examples follow : 1. In the development of its acoustic flowmeter the Coast and Geodetic Survey used the test facilities of the Coastal Engineering Research Center of the Army Engineers. During these tests CERC not only materially assisted the Coast and Geodetic Service in an experimental project, but became acquainted with a system of potential value in their studies of erosion and its effect on breakwaters and jetties. This very sensitive device can measure minor current fluctuations in turbulent areas, thus permitting a better understanding of the eroding ten- dencies of currents along our shores and in our harbors. 2. The Public Health Service is now represented on our Panel. With other member agencies, it undertook a joint review of available instruments to measure and analyze currents. The knowledge thus gained permitted the undertaking of a Significant study on the dispersion of pollution by deep currents in Lake Michigan. 3. Coast Guard’s recent cooperative participation in oceanography has been largely stimulated by its membership in ICO. Some examples related to the work of this Panel include: Establishment and support of meteorological buoys in. the. Gulf of Mexico for the Weather Bureau and the Bureau of Naval Weapons, use of several ocean station ships for special studies by the staff of the Anti- submarine Weapons Environmental Prediction System (ASWEPS) of the Naval Oceanographic Office, and evaluation of an electronic bathythermograph and a sonie wave height sensor in cooperation with the same Office. 4. A recent project, illustrative of the type of informal cooperation encouraged by the Panel, is the development of the expendable bathythermograph. This type of device is cast over the side of a moving vessel and sends back signals from which ean be derived a plot of temperature against depth. The need for such a device was included in one of the lists of required instruments in the pro- ceedings of the Panel’s instrumentation symposium. As a result, companies undertook its development with their own funds. By the end of the next fiscal year, operational evaluations of these expendable BT’s will have been completed by the Navy Oceanographic Instrumentation Center, the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries, the Bureau of Ships, and possibly by the Coast and Geodetie Survey. Although the requirements of each of these agencies are slightly different, it is hoped they can be met by one instrument which can be easily and cheaply produced. If so, a substantial advance will have been made over the conventional bathythermograph which has been serving the oceanographic community unchanged for the past 27 years. The end point of this development will be an automatic system than can func- tion from all types of oceanographic platforms: buoys, ships, even aircraft. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 67 5. In some cases it is more desirable for agencies to monitor work done by one agency while concentrating their development efforts elsewhere. The de- velopment of large, multipurpose, telemetering buoys by the Office of Naval Re- search is recognized by the ICO as the Government’s primary buoy development effort. The progress in this single, large contract is reported at intervals to the mem- bers of a Guidance Committee, representing Government, academic institutions, and private industry. Such meetings insure that all pertinent information is incorporated into the design of a truly multipurpose buoy. When completed it will become the basic unit for the large synoptic buoy networks to monitor a great variety of parameters vital to the forecasting of sea conditions and long-range weather phenomena essential for national defense, commercial fisheries and other research and operational programs. 6. Other buoy developments are proceeding for smal! or highly specialized ap- plications, such as the submerged stable instrument platform of the Coast and Geodetic Survey and the jointly sponsored Office of Naval Research-Bureau of Commercial Fisheries-Scripps Institution of Oceanography lightweight current and temperature recording buoys. This Panel has encouraged the concept of locating major Government ocean- ographie laboratories near academic institutions or as interagency complexes, whenever this is in the best interest of all concerned. Usually, there are many advantages: Academic stimulation, cooperative use of vessels, libraries, labora- tories, and other expensive facilities and equipment, participation in joint re- search activities, free exchange of scientists and technicians, ete. Oceanographic laboratories generally use and assist the facilities of other groups in their local areas. Visits and cooperative programs are encouraged between scientists from more distant laboratories, from educational institutions, industry, and also foreign countries. For example, the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries Biological Laboratory at San Diego has been working closely with the Naval Hlectronics Laboratory and a local company in an attempt to develop a-sonic fish locating and identifying device. The new BCE Laboratory. now under construction on the Scripps campus, will provide Laboratory and office space for the Geological Survey and the Inter- American Tropical Tuna Commission. Four bureaus in the Department of the Interior, Geological Survey, Bureau of Mines, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, and Bureau of Commercial Fisheries are planning the establishment of an Interior Oceanographic Center at Tiburon, Calif., which has the enthusiastic support of the local scientific com- munity. In January 1963, the Navy formally dedicated its Oceanographic Instrumenta- * tion Center, here in Washington. This facility, established with ICO support, is being studied as the prototype of a national center for testing, calibrating, and standardizing oceanographic instruments. FUTURE PLANS The major task before the Panel in the future will be to continue coordinated planning to define immediate and long-range needs for major oceanographic facilities and equipment and to accelerate the Government’s oceanographic in- strumentation and ocean engineering programs. The development of adequate test and valuation techniques is becoming in- creasingly important. Industry is now not only developing good instruments but also preparing programs on how to use them to excellent advantage. Not long ago we were making our own instruments; now, we buy them from industry and assist in their development. A large part of our effort in the immediate future will be the development of detailed test and evaluation procedures to aid the designers and manufacturers. This vital and necessary part of instrument development is expensive in both time and funds. The capability of industry has been well demonstrated. Funds .are required in amounts greater than previously realized, both for in-house liai- ee consumer evaluation, and for development and product engineering by industry. Ocean engineering is another important aspect of the Panel’s future work. A special working group is exploring the role and responsibility of Government in this area of oceanography. We are beginning to recognize the need—indeed, the necessity—for a greater capability by this Nation for operating in and ex- > 68 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 ploiting the oceans much more actively and efficiently. We may note that various segments of industry and the academic community have already started to point the way. An adequate information exchange system is vital to coordination at all levels from the working scientists and engineers, through the procurement and man- agerial staffs, to the top policymakers. We plan to continue and expand our efforts along the lines previously mentioned. The Panel intends to foster the development of interagency instrument sys- tems. Hxamples of these are: (a) National or international oceanwide buoy networks.—W orldwide monitor- ing systems are necessary to provide synoptic data on weather and ocean environ- ment for predicting and ultimately controlling weather, for more efficient ex- ploitation of our fisheries, and to improve military surveillance and ocean trans- portation. (b) Satellite systems.—To relay the data from buoys and other ocean platforms to national and international data centers. The use of satellites to relay data, automatically monitored information and platform location, not only will tie in with the above buoy networks but will aid in the protection of human lives, reporting the position of vessels, life rafts, aircraft, and icebergs. Though expensive, such systems would result in Savings in search-for-rescue alone nearly equal to their cost. The feasibility of this technique was dramatically demon- strated by the BCF vessel, the Geronimo, which transmitted oceanographic data to the National Oceanographic Data Center via Syncom satellite. (c) Sensors.—These very small but key parts of all observational systems are a most critical technical area, requiring further development. (dad) Undersea structures and devices.—With the increasing accessibility of the mesodepths and greater knowledge about the riches they contain, whole new fam- ilies of devices are coming into being: Small submersible workboats, remote con- trol manipulators, undersea structures, and inhabited stations. Communication, and monitoring networks, mining techniques, midwater and deep fishing methods must be developed. We must increase our effort in the underwater realm. (e) More shorebased facilities are vital for this effort—Hducational institu- tions have been meagerly funded. Whole new campuses are required, sea-grant eolleges if you will, to train the coming generations in ocean technology, aqua- cultural engineering, undersea navigation, three-dimensional seamanship, and deep water mining techniques. Existing oceanographic centers need to be ex- panded so as to extend the capabilities of their personnel. Large new marine technological institutes specializing in the various engineering aspects need to be established. An example of such a base is the proposed Interior Oceanographic Base at Tiburon, Calif., now occupied by skeleton planning groups from three agencies. Emphasis here will be in scientific research, engineering research, surveys, and monitoring. Logistics, data handling, monitoring, and instrumen- tation will also be undertaken. This Panel is proud to have had a role in the national oceanographic effort. We believe we have made substantial progress. We are attempting to provide lead- ership and help coordination in this area of ocean science and technology for all segments of the oceanographic community. Mr. Lennon. Our next witness is Dr. Arthur E. Maxwell, Chairman of the Interagency Committee on Oceanography Panel on Interna- tional Programs. Doctor, we certainly would like to stay here as long as you need to read your statement but I wonder if, in the interest of time, having dic- tated this statement, and spent a great deal of time in research on it, 1f you want to read it in its entirety or do you want to go through it and comment on it and put the statement in the record ? I am a little bit afraid that today, for sure, we will get a quorum eall right after 12 o’clock. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 69 STATEMENT OF DR. ARTHUR E. MAXWELL, HEAD, GEOPHYSICS BRANCH OF THE OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH AND CHAIRMAN OF THE INTERAGENCY COMMITTEE ON OCEANOGRAPHY PANEL ON INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMS Dr. Maxwett. If it is agreeable to you, Mr. Chairman, I would be pleased just to submit my statement for the record. Mr. Lennon. We will assume the committee members, even though they aré not all here, are going to read it and study it. Go ahead and do whatever you want to do. Dr. Maxweru. I would be pleased to submit it for the record and comment on it, and perhaps be available for questions in order to save time. Mr. Lennon. If there is no objection, Dr. Maxwell’s prepared state- ment will immediately follow his testimony today. - Dr. Maxwetxu. Mr. Chairman and members of the committee, it is a great pleasure to be here before you again. Personally, I feel that this is one of the most important panels of the Interagency Commit- tee on Oceanography and [ think this is particularly so in listening to the committee hearings so far where we have alluded to a great num- ber of questions in regard our international programs. T think you will also find as we go along that the programs of the Research and Survey Panels all gradually feed into our international programs. I do not think I need to go into any great detail as to why the international aspects of oceanography are so important. Secretary Wakelin and Mr. McKernan have mentioned many of these and the fact that the oceans are so large and that they belong to no one are facts certainly obvious to all of us. Nonetheless, I think it is true that our international programs must have some sort of theme to them and they must be serving an economic interest and policy mat- ters in order to be useful for the Government and in order to be sup- ported by our Government. Some of the items that are of particular significance with regard to international cooperation are the various kinds of scientific studies that require the cooperation of many nations. For example, air-sea interaction has been discussed many times this morning and yesterday. Tf we are to look into the air-sea interaction program, we find that this is a program of global nature and it requires observations from a global area. These cannot be done very easily by any single nation and cooperation of many nations makes it very desirable. In 1961 our cooperation in international programs in oceanography was considerably enhanced by the formation of the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission under the auspices of UNESCO. Since that time, there have been three meetings of the Commission and five meetings of its Bureau. The last meeting of this Commission ended only last Friday. Mr. McKernan, your last witness, was the chairman of the U.S. delegation to this meeting. There are two programs which have been 70 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 mentioned several times before these hearings which are formal pro- grams of the Commission. These are the International Indian Ocean Expedition and the International Cooperative Investigations of the Tropical Atlantic. The International Indian Ocean Expedition started out as an inter- national program developed by the Special Committee on Oceano- graphic Research, a nongovernmental group, but this was taken over by ICO at its first meeting in 1961. The second program, the one on Tropical Atlantic, was one initiated in the United States by the ICO itself. The program looked promis- ing as a national program and, as such, it was submitted to the Inter- governmental Commission for its consideration. It was adopted and has broken down the program into three parts; Equalants I, II, and ITT, which have already been completed. The first two of these were carried out in the spring and fall of 1963 and the last was completed only this spring. We have been particu- larly fortunate in this in that the United States has had a member of the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries as the International Coordinator for this program. In general, the program has thrived under our leadership. To give you some estimate of the magnitude of these international programs, the Indian Ocean Expedition has had participation by some 40 ships from about 12 different countries. In addition, eight other countries participated with scientific assistance. The U.S. effort in this expedition has been approximately one-third of the total effort and through the end of next year when the Indian Ocean Expedition officially ends, we will have sent approximately 14 cruises to the area and the total cost of these will run in the neighborhood of $20 million. Again, I would like to repeat this is about a third of the total effort in the International Indian Ocean Expedition. Returning now to the tropical] Atlantic, we find in Equalant I, that there were 14 vessels taking part from 7 nations: three were from the United States; three from the Soviet Union, and other countries that participated were Argentina, Brazil, the Republic of Congo, Nigeria, and the Republic of the Ivory Coast. In Equalant IT, 11 vessels participated from 8 nations and during Equalant IIT, there were 8 vessels from 6 nations. As Mr. McKernan told you, one of the very successful things about this expedition was the fact that all of the data collected on EKqualants I and IT have been received in World Data Center A located here in Washington. These data have been published in a data report and were made available last week to the Intergovernmental Ocean Commission. In terms of the volume of this raw data amounts to approximately 4 inches thickness. This isa tremendous effort and I do not think there has been any other instance where countries working together in inter-_ national programs have been able to submit their data so rapidly and make it available for everybody to look at. In addition to the two programs under the TOC that IT have men- tioned, there is a third program, the Cooperative Study of Kuroshio adopted only last week as an intergovernmental program. At the present time the United States has not decided its extent of participation in this. This is still under study by our Government, by the various agencies within the IOC. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 ae In addition to these formal cooperative programs, there are numer- ous other informational programs of an international nature. I think perhaps one of the best known is the cooperative work of the Lamont Geological Observatory of Columbia University with South America that has been carried out over the past decade. Lamont has worked closely with the Hydrographic Office of the Argentine Navy and, asa matter of fact, the results of this cooperative work have provided the basis for establishing and effective oceano- graphic program in Argentina. This is also true for countries such as Brazil, Chile, and Peru. Our panel has been in existence since 1962 and its purpose really is twofold: First, to insure that U.S. participation in the Intergovern- mental Oceanographic Commission and other international programs proceeds in an aggressive, judicious, and timely manner; and (2) that the panel provides a ferum whereby the various U.S. activities in inter- national oceanographic programs have a common meeting point. This enables the ICO to have a single point where it can be aware of all aspects of U.S. participation in international programs. To date, most of the efforts of our panel have been restricted to responsibilities the United States has in the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission. This involves making sure we are properly represented by our dele- gation to the Commission and insuring that the delegation is well prepared. This entails the development of a U.S. position on agenda items of the Commission meetings. I think it is fair for me to state at this time that the United States in all of the meetings of the Commission and the Bureau has had rep- resenation that has been outstanding and it has been better prepared than any other country attending these sessions. In so doing, it has been able to exert very effective leadership within the Commission. In addition to the mechanism of the Intergovernmental Commission for coordinating international programs in oceanography, there also exists a nongovernmental group. This is the Scientific Committee on Oceanographic Research under the auspices of the International Coun- cil of Scientific Unions. This special committee, SCOR, as it is called, acts as the scientific adviser and conscience to the Intergovern- mental Commission. It is this advisory group that looks over the sci- entific programs of the Commission and also advises the Commission on what it should do. . In the United States, under the National Academy’s Committee on Oceanography, there also exists a special committee, the U.S. National Committee to SCOR. This group provides the U.S. input to SCOR and what this does is to allow for a parallel structure both in the Government and outside the Government in national and international programs. As such, this allows complete participation of all scien- tists throughout the country, those who are working for the Govern- ment and those working for the universities. _ As [have mentioned, most of the past work of our panel has.been im connection with the Commission, making sure we are prepared for this activity. Looking a little to the future, we find several problems facing us that we would like to look into in a little more detail. The first is the problem of international conventions of the sea. This is a very complicated problem as there are many international laws and national laws of various countries that apply. We are trying to €2 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 develop a feeling for this whole problem so that our ideas can even- tually be submitted to the Intergovernmental Commission. Further, there are a number of groups in the country interested in the various international aspects of oceanography. These include the Office of the Foreign Secretary of the National Academy of Sciences, the Office of International Scientific Affairs of the Department of State, and the International Panel of the Federal Council for Science and Technology, as well as our own Panel. In the near future, we hope to bring all of these people together to discuss problems of oceanography in the international sense and to determine, if possible, whether we are really proceeding in the most ageressive fashion and proper leadership as we should in this area. With that, Mr. Chairman, I would like to be available to answer any questions you might have. Mr. Casry (presiding). Thank you, Doctor. Doctor, how much of the total oceanographic funds are spent in international efforts? Dr. Maxweiu. Mr. Casey, I would say in the neighborhood of less than $10 million annually goes into international oceanographic pro- grams. It is difficult to put a firm figure on this since part of these programs are of a formal nature and part of them informal arrange- ments made between various institutions throughout the country. For example, it is difficult to keep track of what part of a cruise, let us say in the northern Atlantic, is international when it is working with a group from the United Kingdom. Mr. Cassy. You heard the statement of Mr. McKernan that Russia is ahead of us in some aspects of commercial fishing and that they have had no luck in getting any exchange on techniques and data that they have in this regard. Do you have other phases in which Russia is holding out on the exchange of data ? Dr. Maxweiu. We have through the International Governmental Commission developed a scheme of exchange of oceanographic infor- mation. This has not worked as well as we would have liked but we are receiving data from the Soviet Union on their oceanographic pro- grams. In particular the data so far received has been from the tropical Atlantic investigations. I In addition we have statements from them saying they will submit data from cruises in the Indian Ocean and other cruises they have declared as a part of their national program. Mr. Casry. Have they given any data that is new or something we have not been able to obtain for ourselves? Have they given us any- thing other than a confirmation of something we have already dis- covered or gotten from some other more friendly country? Have they given us anything of real benefit to us? Dr. Maxwetn. In the case of the tropical Atlantic, they gave us the data they collected at that time and these data are new data and very useful to us. The program we had in this area involved the Soviets carrying out a significant, finite part. If we did not have information on this, we would have had a gap in our knowledge. They provided this and they have provided it completely m that ‘instance. We have not received data from other areas of the world ‘as successfully as we have from this particular area. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 73 Mr. Casey. Does this data have a practical application, or is it of a general scientific nature ? Dr. Maxwe.i. The data is of a scientific nature, but it has its prac- tical applications. One of the reasons for our undertaking this study of the tropical Atlantic was to learn more of the fishing conditions off the west coast of Africa. The data will be very useful in this problem. They are not only data on the physical and chemical properties of the ocean, but biological data and fishing data as well. Mr. Casry. Would you say we are getting sufficient return on what we might be exchanging with them ? In other words, are we getting an equal amount back, or are we doing more than we should ? Dr. Maxweun. On a quid pro quo basis, I would say we are not getting back what we are putting in, but I think we must keep in mind these agreements have cnly been entered inte fairly recently, in the last year or so. The Soviets have promised to send some of their data. Other countries have submitted data in much greater quantities than we, at least per capita. Canada has been one of the largest contrib- utors te the data center. There are other nations with which we have good relations in oceanography; for example, the United Kingdom, and some of the South American countries, who have not submitted any information. Mr. Casry. Are we trying to show leadership and good faith in try- ing to get the others to live up to the agreement, or are we holding back? Dr. Maxwetu. We are trying to do this, but we are keeping a care- ful eye on what is going on in the situation to make sure these other countries live up to their agreements in this area, and to insure that we are not the only one putting data in. Mr. Casey. How long do you think we should go on seeing if they live up-to the agreement? Dr. Maxwetu. We have had also from the Soviets a finite time by which they will submit data. I think we should see if they meet their schedules. They have said they would submit some other data some- time in the month of July. This commitment was made after they sub- mitted earlier this year a list of declared national programs. I might explain about these declared national programs. Once a country declares certain national programs it has underway, it carries with it an obligation to send the results of these programs into the world data centers. It has only been recently that the Soviets de- clared a large number of these programs with the full intention of sending the data to the world data centers. Mr. Casey. Going through your statement rapidly, I notice that the Second World Conference on Oceanography is probably going to be held in Russia ; is that correct ? Dr. Maxweti. That is correct. Mr. Casry. In 1966. Where was the first one held ? Dr. Maxwetu. It was held in 1959 in the United Nations in New York. ‘This was under the sponsorship of the American Association for the Advancement of Science and UNESCO. The Commission, at its third session last week, approved the Soviets’ offer to hold the next International Oceanographic Congress in the 74 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Soviet Union under the auspices of UNESCO. This wil be held prob- ably in 1966—the spring of 1966. _ Mr. Casry. Do you think their cooperation merits that sort of an honor? Dr. Maxwexty. With regard to their participation in the Commis- sion, certainly along with ourselves, they have been one of the leaders in this field and have encouraged many other countries to develop programs, both national programs, and international programs in oceanography. I think the Soviets are making a genuine effort in this field to cooperate with us. We have learned a lot from them. We have had an exchange of personnel between our ships and their ships. I think this is good for oceanography for the two countries to do this. T think they deserve the recognition of holding the second congress in the Soviet Union. Mr. Casny. Thank you very much, Doctor. Tomorrow we will hear from Dr. Wallen and Commander Nygren, and Captain Treadwell and Dr. Jacobs. We will resume our hearings tomorrow morning at 10 o’clock. (Dr. Maxwell’s prepared statement follows :) STATEMENT By Dr. ARTHUR E. MAXWELL, HEAD, GEOPHYSICS BRANCH OF THE OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH, AND CHAIRMAN OF THE INTERAGENCY COMMITTEE ON OCEANOGRAPHY PANEL ON INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMS Mr. Chairman and members of the committee, it is a great pleasure to appear before you as Chairman of the Panel on International Programs. Personally, I feel that this is one of the most important panels of the Interagency Committee on Oceanography. The oceans like the atmosphere are amenable to international cooperation be- cause events which happen in one portion may have far-reaching effects at remote locations and great distances. For example, changes in the oceanic circulation off the coast of Florida may produce a profound effect at a later time off the coast of Norway. This, plus the facts that the sheer size of the ocean and that it belongs to no particular nation, makes it particularly con- ducive to international scientific cooperation. In spite of these factors, sci- entific cooperation un oceanic research will be practical only when the sums of the scientific, economic, and political benefits are useful. Obviously, the science would not be good unless the scientific programs are sound and yet sound programs may not likely be supported unless they serve the government’s needs in economics or politics. Nonetheless, experience has shown over the past decade or so that many scientific programs in oceanography fulfill these re- quirements. Many instances can be cited where international cooperation in oceanie research has been useful. For example, it has speeded up the explora- tion in areas where little has been known. The International Indian Ocean Ex- pedition and the International Cooperative Investigations of the Tropical At- lantic are both examples of this type of program. We would have had no more than cursory information on either of these areas had it not been for these co- operative programs in which many nations participated. Likewise, inyestiga- tions of this type have provided a mechanism for the intercalibration of tech- niques whereby standardized methods are introduced and observations taken by one country may be compared directly with another. Further, there are many scientific studies which can be accomplished only through the concerted efforts of many nations since no single nation has either the manpower or resources to carry out the program singularly. Some ex- amples of these kinds of scientific programs are the study of air-sea inter- action which involves the exchange of energy and material between the atmos- phere and the ocean. Often these studies require synoptic or nearly simul- taneous measurements made over very large areas of the earth’s surface. Ob- viously, to obtain the data required for studies of this nature, the participation of many countries is required. Similarly, fluctuations in sea level which occur NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 75 on a global scale must be measured on a global scale. Also, since these changes are of a secular or long period nature, a long-time series of observations, often in remote areas, is required. Again, these observations would tax the resources of any single country and could be carried out more easily through international cooperation. Studies of a biological nature are also amenable for international cooperation. The determination of the kinds and amount of fish contained in the ocean, aS well as how rapidly these are consumed and reproduced, is one of prodigious effort requiring a considerable period of time. This will be so even with international cooperation and painstakingly so if it were to be undertaken by individual countries. Another area in which many countries have individual efforts and in which these efforts could be made much more efficient is the map- ping of the topography of the ocean floor. Cooperative programs in this in- stance would prevent duplication of efforts and would also provide an interchange of techniques and interpretation. Still another area in which international cooperation has been useful is that of data exchange. This was particularly demonstrated during the period of the International Geophysical Year in which world data centers were estab- lished. These data centers allowed for the free exchange of information between all countries. In addition to data exchange, cooperative programs in oceanography have also provided a mechanism for the exchange of scientists and ideas. This has proved to be particularly useful between countries such as the United States and the Soviet Union, where normally there is a minimum of such exchange. Further, along these iines, there results from these exchanges an increased wnderstand- ing among oceanographers. if this understanding is pursued on a broad enough basis, it could conceivably produce a marked effect on international relations. Similarly, oceanegraphie research ships, as they visit various countries, in a way act as ambassadors of good will and understanding, particularly since their mission is one that is devoted to increasing the welfare of mankind. Although cooperative programs in oceanography have been carried out to one extent or another for many decades, the most significant effort of this kind was undertaken during the International Geophysical Year in 1957-58. This was organized by the special committee for the IGY under the auspices of the International Council of Scientific Unions with most of the large maritime coun- tries participating in the program. Upon the completion of this international endeayor, SCOR, a special committee of ICSU, examined possible areas of re- search in which this cooperative spirit could be continued. The result was the initiation of the international Indian Ocean expedition. Although this program was conceived in 1958, ship operations did not commence until 1961, and they will extend through the end of 1965. In 1961 the newly formed Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) assumed responsibility for the coordination of the International Indian Ocean Expedition (IIOE). The IIOE represents the first formal international program of several to be sponsored by the iOC. This program was drawn up to provide for a concerted study of one of the least known oceanic areas in the world—the Indian Ocean. Underlying theme of the program was to determine the effect the changing monsoon winds had upon the ocean circulation and, in turn, what effect this had on the biological productivity. The scientific program was broken into four broad areas of interest. The first concerned itself with the problem of the ocean basin. For example, how does the bottom of the Indian Ocean compare with bottom features of other oceans and what were the geological forces that shaped the basin? The second broad area of interest covered the chemical and physical description of the waters and the dynamics of their motion. The third major field of interest concerned the living populations in the Indian Ocean, both plant and animal. In particular, there has been much effort to determine the productivity of this area. The last broad area of research involved the interaction between the ocean and atmos- phere, especially the difference of conditions between the two monsoon seasons. This effort included not only studies from surface ships but also involved the use of fixed ocean buoys and meteorological aircraft. In this connecticn an International Meteorological Center was established in Bombay which w’ll be continued at the end of the expedition. By the end of 1965 over 40 ships from about 12 countries will have participated. In addition, eight other countries will have provided scientifie assistance. The U.S. effort in this program amounts to approximately one-third the total and 76 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 has entailed approximately 14 cruises to the area at an estimated total cost through 1965 of $20 million. The second major international program to be sponsored by the Commission was the International Cooperative Investigation of Tropical Atlantic. Initial impetus for the program came from the United States. This endeavor was divided into three efforts designated Equalants I, Il and III. During Hqualant I, 14 vessels took part from 7 nations. Of these 14 ships, 3 were from the United States and 3 from the Soviet Union. Other countries that participated were Argentina, Brazil, Republic of Congo, Nigeria, and the Republic of Ivory Coast. In Equalant II, 11 vessels participated from 8 nations and during Equalant III there were 8 vessels from 6 nations. Equalants I and II were carried out in the spring and fall of 1963, respectively, and Equalant III has been completed only in the past month. One of the noteworthy achievements of this cooperative investigation has been the rapid assimilation of data at World Data Center A, located in Washington, D.C. All of the data from Equalants I and II have been received and published and a good part of the data from Equalant III is in hand. The total cost to the United States in this program was about $3 million all of which came out of regularly sponsored programs. Another program under the auspices of the IOC is the proposed investigations of the Kuroshio and adjacent regions off the coast of Japan. This program, now in its planning stage, has been initiated primarily through the efforts of Japan, Korea, Philippines, and the U.S.S.R. The extent of U.S. participation is still not known at this time. In addition, several cooperative oceanographic programs exist between the United States and Japan which have resulted from bilateral agreements between these two nations entered into by the Prime Minister of Japan and the President of the United States. Aside from the formal programs mentioned above, there are numerous in- formal oceanographic programs between the United States and other countries which have been carried out over many years. Perhaps the most significant of these has been the cooperative effort between the Lamont Geological Observatory of Columbia University and many South American countries. This work has been particularly fruitful with Argentina, Chile, Peru, and Brazil. For the past decade, Lamont has worked very closely with the Hydrographic Office of the Argentine Navy and this interest has provided the basis for most of the oceano- graphic research now going on in that country. Similarly, the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution has worked very closely with the National Institute of Oceanography of England in the northern Atlantic and Indian Oceans and with the French in the Mediterranean Sea. Likewise, the Scripps Institution of Oceanography has carried out many cooperative programs in the North Pacific with Japan and Canada. Noteworthy of mention are the Norpac expeditions of 1955 and the Hastropic expedition of 1956. At the present time, informal coop- erative programs between the United States, Peru, and Ecuador are underway to study the El Nino phenomenon which occurs randomly off the west coast of Central and South America. Also, the French bathyscaph Archimede is presently engaged in the exploration of the Puerto Rican Trench as part of a joint United States-French program. Coordination of the U.S. participation in these many international oceano- graphic programs is carried out primarily through the Interagency Committee on Oceanography. Under the ICO exists a Panel on International Programs established in 1962. The purpose of this Panel is twofold: (1) to ensure that U.S. participation in the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission and other international programs proceeds in an aggressive, judicious and timely manner; and (2) that the Panel provides a forum whereby the various U.S. activities in international oceanographic programs have a common meeting point. This allows the ICO to be aware of all aspects of U.S. participation in international oceanographic programs. To date, the primary effort of the Panel has been devoted to the U.S. responsibilities in the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission. This has entailed the selection of U.S. delegations and the development of the U.S. positions on the agenda items to be discussed at the Commission meetings. There have been three sessions of the full Com- mission and five meetings of its Bureau in the 4 years of its existence. It is my pleasure to report that at all of these meetings, the United States has been far better prepared than any other of the 51 member countries. This has enabled the United States to assume the position of effective leadership in this important Intergovernmental Commission. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 ai Parallel to the governmental structure for coordinating international pro- grams there exists, under the auspices of the National Academy of Sciences Committee on Oceanography (NASCO), a U.S. National Committee to SCOR which as you recall is the Scientific Committee on Oceanic Research of the International Council of Scientific Unions (ICSU). SCOR acts as the scientific advisor and conscience to the Intergovernmental Commission in much the same manner as the NASCO does to our ICO. Therefore, this provides for this interaction between university and governmental scientists both at the national and international levels. As I have mentioned, there have been three meetings of the L[10C—the last of these terminated only last Friday, June 19. At this third session, 17 resolu- tions were adopted. To give you an idea of the activities of the Commission, I shall mention some of the more salient resolutions. In the long run perhaps the most significant was the acceptance of a draft of the General Scientific Framework for World Ocean Study. I have taken the liberty of using some of the material from this draft in my opening remarks. This document is in- tended to provide the basic framework around which future programs of the Commission can be designed in order that logical international programs for the study of the ocean can be developed. As I have already mentioned, the Commission adopted the cooperative study of the Kuroshio and adjacent regions as an official program. The Commission also approved of the U.S.S.R. proposal for a Second World Oceanographic Congress to be held in the Soviet Union in 1866 under the sponsorship of UNESCO. Further, the Commission recom- mended that all member states adopt the recent recommendation approved by the general assembly of the Intergovernmental Maritime Consultative Organiza- tion (IMCO) concerning the marking and identification of oceanographic sta- tions. This is particularly significant because it may, in future years, provide the basis for international conventions concerning research in the open ocean. Another important resolution recommended that member states assist each other in encouraging and developing national programs in marine research. The Commission elected Dr. Panikkar of India its new Chairman, along with Dr. Lacombe of France and Dr. Sugiwara of Japan as Vice Chairmen. These officers will serve from the present time till the end of the next meeting of the Commission which will be in Paris in 1965. The following member states were appointed to the Consultative Council of the Commission—Argentina, Aus- tralia, Brazil, Canada, Germany, Poland, United Arab Republic, United King- dom, Ukraine, United States of America, and U.S.S.R. Although in the coming months the Panel on International Programs of the Interagency Committee on Oceanography will spend a large share of its time on matters connected with the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission, other matters of international importance are coming to the forefront. Some of these will include discussions on how the United States can effectively exploit the natural resources of the sea such as fish and minerals and discussions on the international conventions which may apply thereto. Further, in order that the United States maintain leadership in world oceanography the Panel has con- sidered calling a small conference which would include, besides the Panel mem- bers, the National Academy of Sciences Committee on Oceanography, the Inter- national Panel of the Federal Council for Science and Technology, Office of the Foreign Secretary of the National Academy of Sciences, Office of International Scientific Affairs of the Department of State, and appropriate members of the Agency for International Development (AID). The main purpose of this con- ference would be to insure that future U.S. international programs in oceanog- raphy are as effective as possible from the scientific, economic, and political aspects. I appreciate the opportunity to appear before you today and I will be pleased to answer any questions you may have. (Whereupon, at 12:05 p.m., the committee adjourned, to reconvene at 10 a.m., Thursday, June 25, 1964.) 393-37 7— 64—_6 tole i Re hin ™ esl eRe Geka Ae cents ar i iptaaroset oo her NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 THURSDAY, JUNE 25, 1964 Houses or REPRESENTATIVES, SUBCOMMITTEE ON OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ComMITTEE ON MercHant Marine AND FISHERIES, Washington, D.C. The subcommittee met at 10 a.m., pursuant to call, in room 219, ‘(Cannon House Office Building, Hon. Alton Lennon (chairman of the subcommittee) presiding. Mr. Lennon. Gentlemen, we will resume the hearings. I understand we are to have a film this morning and with the help -of some of you gentlemen and some of the members of the committee staff, we will move right along with that. We apologize for the delay but we had a markup this morning on a couple of bills in executive session. Proceed. (A film was shown.) Mr. Lennon. We are delighted to have with us this morning, Dr. I. E. Wallen, Chairman of the Research Panel and Assistant Director for Oceanography, from the Smithsonian Institution. We are delighted to have you, Dr. Wallen, and if you have a written or prepared statement, fine. You may proceed. If you care to, in the interest of time, you can include your state- ment in the record and hit the high spots. You can put your state- ment in the record at the conclusion of your verbal statement and we will then ask questions. What is your choice? STATEMENT OF DR. I. E. WALLEN, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR FOR OCEANOGRAPHY, MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY, SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION, AND CHAIRMAN, RESEARCH PANEL, INTER- AGENCY COMMITTEE ON OCEANOGRAPHY Dr. Watten. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I will take advantage of your latter offer and talk off the cuff. Mr. Lennon, Thankyou, sir. Goright ahead. Dr. Wauten. Mr. Chairman and members of the committee, I am talking for the Research Panel of the Interagency Committee on Ocean- ography. It has been the responsibility of this Panel to attempt to coordinate research efforts of the various Federal departments to make sure that there is in fact interagency cooperation in research. _I have listed in my statement some examples of cooperation in re- search and have listed the members of the Research Panel. L.will 79 80 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 talk briefly about the kinds of operations the committee engages 11; which might be summarized by saying that we have operated through subpanels. We established a subpanel in biology which has examined the field of marine biology, helped to define the field, and helped to choose that part of marine biology we wanted to consider as a part of the oceanographic program. After this decision was made, we were able to incorporate the re- sults of this Panel in the 10-year plan so that we have not prepared a specific report. Another subpanel was formed to meet a different kind of a prob- lem. We established a panel on radiobiology because there was some question as to the adequacy of communications among the various agencies. Some of the people had raised questions concerning the desirability of declassification of some of the projects. So, this Panel was asked to consider the-problem. As a result of their considerations we were able to define rather clearly the roles of the U.S. Public Health Service, the Atomic Energy Commission, the National Science Foundation, and the Navy. Those agencies which had the primary interest in this field. There, again, we did not require a report of the subpanel. Another panel of which we did require a report was established to consider undersea research vehicles. We had received, particularly as a result of the loss of the 7’hresher, considerable stimulus to consider ocean engineering. You saw in the film and have otherwise heard of the Deep Submergence System Review Group which considered particularly the engineering problems involved in getting to depths in the ocean. It was the job of the Research Panel to try to pick out those kinds of research which could only be done with these vehicles. We hoped to set the standards which the engineers should meet in order to develop the vehicles. We expect to have copies of this report on undersea vehicles within the next 2 months. Another recently established subpanel is concerned with micro- biology. Microbiology is of particular interest to us because of the applications of pharmaceuticals, poisons, toxins, wastes, plankton or- ganisms, bacteria, and so forth, as they affect humans. We are asking the microbiology panel to go through this field of science, pick out those parts of the field that are oceanographic in nature and determine what the level of effort is at the present time. They should make recommendations with regard to how the oceano- graphic program may more adequately treat this field. Now if I might go beyond the organization of panel into the sub- ject matter of research and oceanography, I have listed some examples of the effectiveness of oceanographic research in developing new in- formation. Perhaps I can take advantage of the fact that my formal statement has been presented for the record, Mr. Chairman, and talk about some other things not in my statement. One of them that I might start with is a study of circulation off of the mouth of rivers. We have known for a long time that river dis- charge into the ocean must have a substantial effect on the sea. For example, it affects us by increasing the production of organisms in NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 81 the ocean in that area and we think we know the reason; that is, that those chemical elements, organic material, washed in from the land are of value to the organisms of the sea and provide the life material for their bodies. We were very much concerned in learning how far into the ocean these kinds of effects might be felt. So, in a joint project between the Navy, the National Science Foundation, and the Atomic Energy Com- mission, a rather major study was undertaken off of the Columbia River with the result that we were able to trace Columbia River water for as much as 450 miles away from the mouth of the river. This was a particularly interesting study for two reasons; No. 1, be- cause of its oceanographic implications; No. 2, it gave us a chance to test atomic energy equipment to determine how far we might be able to identify the waste materials in the Hanford reactors. As I indicated, it was possible to identify very minute quantities of materials in the orders of parts per 10 billion off of the Columbia River, approximately 450 miles. Another thing that I might mention as an example, which is not included in my statement, is the recent advance in fisheries, particular- ly the discovery of the large fishery potential in connection with up- welling in the ocean. Oceanographers now spend a substantial portion of their time studying the location of currents and the reasons for up- welling. Up-welling means that those organisms—that is to the biologists—those organisms that die on the surface of the ocean and fall to the depths of the ocean are releasing their elements toward the bottom of the ocean, having picked them up near the surface. So, in order to get a cycle established to return these nutrients, it is necessary to have the bottom water brought to the surface. In those areas where ocean bottom water comes to the surface of the ocean, we have greatly increased productivity. We can harvest fishes in larger number and we can find greater varieties of organisms. The Indian Ocean Expedition discovered such an area for the first time off the coast of Thailand and Indonesia at certain times of the year. This is connected, no doubt, with the monsoons. We are able to recommend to the governments of these countries that it would be desirable to investigate the possibility of establishing fishing indus- tries in the area. In oceanography, in the physical part, we have been able to identify various contributing currents to the gulf stream. Up until this time, as far as the map was concerned, the gulf stream began approximately at the coast of Florida and continued just off New England and was known to lead east. Its sources and contributing currents were not well known but recent data has certainly given us a much better understanding of the sources of the gulf stream from the central Atlantic, the equatorial current, which itself was only recently discovered, and from the circulating cur- rents that run through the Gulf of Mexico and, of course, from those currents that run along the northern coast of South America. Another recent development which I think is of interest, is the use of computers’ in environmental studies. For a long time, ecologists and biologists interested in organisms and their relationship to the environment were very much disturbed at their inability to handle the large amounts of data that could be accumulated. It was impos- 82 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 sible to make a major study of a biological area in order to say that this group of organisms occurs here and has commercial value. Or, that this group of organisms occurs here and may be of value for pharmaceuticals. . Or, this maybe occurs here and may be hazardous; this occurs here and may be harmful to fouling; this produces bioluminescence. In order to approach this problem, we have finally been able to de- vise a system of incorporating the data onto puncheards and then putting them into electronic computers. Recently it has been possible to complete a study of the distribution of organisms.in the Gulf-of California. We expect to do much more of this in the future. From the geological standpoint, we have recently discovered large numbers of sea mountains, and have found a rather definite relation- ship between fishes and these undersea structures. This, of course, 1s' of value again to fisheries because of the possibility to accumulate the: fishes in commercial quantities in and around these sea mounts. I might add just a few things, too, in the field of interagency co- operation in research. The one that I mentioned concerned the co- operation of the Atomic Energy Commission, the National Science Foundation, and the Navy in supporting a single ship for the most part, but with supporting vessels in the area off the Columbia. River. I might also call attention to the joint use of vessels by various agencies. For example, the University of Miami, which operates its. ship from support from the Office of Naval Research and the National Science Foundation, made a cruise to the tropical Atlantic area. It did this in cooperation with the Coast Guard, with a Woods Hole oceanographic vessel, with scientists from the Smithsonian In:titution, sicentists from the University of Miami, and the Bureau of Commer- cial Fisheries. The Bureau of Commercial Fisheries and the Public Health Service have operated for a long time in the areas of pollution and waste con- trol, and have in fact had in existence for several years, even longer than the Interagency Committee on Oceanography, a committee be- tween the two agencies which considers the problem of joint interests, of making it possible for the Public Health Service to operate on Bu- reau of Commercial Fisheries and Bureau of Sports Fisheries vessels and working up the data in cooperation so that that information of special value to public health is given to the Public Health Service and the information that may be obtained on the distribution of or- ganisms and their possible importance to man is taken by the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries and Sport Fisheries and Wildlife. In the Antarctic program of the National Science Foundation, sup- port has been given to the Weather Bureau, to the Smithsonian Insti- tution, to the Navy, and to many other Government organizations, in- cluding of course the Coast Guard for its work in that area. One of the programs we face in research is, How do we gather data. on a long-term basis from a single place? We have had reasonably successful cooperation, and I think reasonably successful only because our success in engineering has not been sufficient to meet our needs in sciences yet, in the development of buoy programs. We find buoys being supported through the instrument panel of ICO, buoys being supported by the research panel of ICO, and the development of buoys. 1s of course a very important lead in our ability to take data less ex- pensively over long periods of time. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 83 Perhaps that is enough deviation from my talk. I might mention in closing a little bit about Project Mohole. Proj- ect Mohole has had so much publicity that the Interagency Commitee has been forced to give it some consideration. I did want particularly to point out that we are aware of the progress of Project Mohole and very much interested in it. However, from the standpoint of eceanog- raphy, we are interested not in Mohole because of its ability to take a sample from the center of the earth, or at least from a deeper part of the earth, but we are interested in it because it gives us an oceano- graphic capability that we cannot now meet. We support Project Mohole by attempting to develop a long coring capability. That 1s, a capability for taking cores that are 1,000 feet or longer in length. The length of the cores in the national oceanog- raphy program are generally determined by the length of life of the bit that is attached to the drilling device. As long as the bit lasts, we continue to take a core, and with present bits this means we can pene- trate to something of the order of 1,000 feet. Another very interesting problem which I thought I might mention in closing has to do with a discovery in the Indian Ocean that during apparently a large part, if not all of the year, there exists in a major part of the ocean in the Arabian Sea a large area that is devoid of oxygen: . This means that no organisms can live on the bottom of the ocean. It means that those organisms that live in the middle of the ocean are restricted, but 1t means that because there is a lack of oxygen there must be something to take the oxygen out. The lack of oxygen is related, apparently, to the production of a large amount of organic material. The organic materials are the nutrients that provide the basis of life in the sea, so the surface of the Arabian Sea is really teem- ing with life, tremendous numbers of fishes, tremendous quantities of other marine organisms. It would be very interesting to speculate, which is all it is, on the reason why this oxygenless area has persisted, apparently, long after there has been substantial introduction of organic material into the area. It is certainly interesting to speculate how it might be possible to distribute this organic matter, or to find other so-called pools of organic matter in the ocean that could serve as a fertilizer and thus increase the production of fishes beyond the hundreds of billions of pounds that were discussed in the film. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. I will be pleased to answer questions. Mr. Lennon. Thank you, Dr. Wallen. We are delighted to have the chairman of the full committee who is enthusiastic about the whole program. Chairman Bonner, do you have any questions? Mr. Bonner. No questions. Mr. Mosuer. I am not sure it is relevant, but his reference to this area.of the sea devoid of oxygen reminds me of the problem we have in Lake Erie which is becoming devoid of oxygen. What do you do to replace oxygen ? . Are there any techniques in a relatively small area such as Lake Erie? Are there any techniques by which there is hope we can over- come the pollution problem there? . Dr. Warten. The easiest way which could be practiced in a smaller lake would be to flush out that water and get rid of the excess organi¢ 84 NATIONAL OCHANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 material, or to dilute it. In Lake Erie, where there is continual addi- tion of organic material, perhaps not dangerous, but as pollutants, there is not an awful lot that can be done. Mr. Mosuer. I suppose the control of pollution would ultimately rejuvenate the lake? Dr. WatiEen. Yes; that is correct. Mr. Mosuer. That would be the best way to attack that problem? Dr. Warten. A reduction in pollution will certainly reduce the loss of oxygen or will increase the amount of oxygen production. There is a complicating factor, and that is, having reached a level of pollution where there is very substantial organic matter present, the organic matter is used for further production of organisms which themselves die and add to the oganic material, and you have a cycle that lasts for a long period of time so the results are not immediately felt. Cer- tainly it is true in the long run. Mr. Lennon. How long have you served as Chairman of the Re- search Panel? Dr. Watuen. For 2 years. Mr. Lennon. Subpanels are organized within your panels to make special studies of special objectives or projects? Dr. Watien. Yes. Mr. Lennon. And when that function is finished, then that panel phases out and it is directed to some other specialty in the research program ? Dr. Watten. That is correct. Mr. Lennon. That is the practice of the other panel chairman in ICO, is it not ? Dr. Watiten. Yes. Mr. Lennon. They establish subpanels to make special studies to report back to the panel who in turn reports back to the ICO? Dr. WatuENn. Yes. Generally, when a problem arises, it may arise within the panel, or in the ICO, or even in the Federal Council. If a problem is referred from the Federal Council to the ICO, it may be referred to the Re- search Panel which may then establish a special subpanel to meet the problem. Mr. Lennon. During this 2-year period there have been, necessarily, reasonably substantial changes in the personnel of your Panel? Dr. Wattzen. That is correct. Go: Lennon. That would be true of the other several panels of the ICO. Tell me quite frankly, Doctor, during this 2 years that you have been Chairman of this particular Panel, do you believe there has been a greater degree of coordination in this field of oceanography, prog- essively a better degree of coordination than in the last few years? Dr. Watten. Yes, sir; I certainly do. As an example, it seems to me that even the Panel itself does not have to meet so often nowadays, that’ we more or less automatically pick up the phone and ask those people who are involved whether they have programs in the area in which we propose to work. It is not necessary to wait until the problems arise in order to solve the problems. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 85 Mr. Lennon. You mention your degree of research programs was related to the engineering capability of another panel. Dr. Wauten. Yes; that is correct. Mr. Lennon. Particularly in the field of buoys. Dr. Watuten. Our method of precedure may be of interest to you. Generally, in the area of instruments, facilities, and equipment, when a scientist conceives of a new piece of equipment, we consider that research in the development of that piece of equipment is a part of the research program. Mr. Lennon. So you find, I would assume, there are times when your Research Panel confers with the Panel of the Facilities Panel, particularly in the field of engineering as related to buoys and other facilities ? Dr. WALLEN. Yes, sir. Mr. Lennon. Mr. Bauer, do you have any questions at this time? Mr. Bauer. Yes, Mr. Chairman. Dr. Wallen, have any developments occurred in deep ocean coring during the past year ? Dr. WauLen. Yes, there have been a number of developments. The representatives of major oceanographic institutions have made pro- posals for the construction and operation of a new or converted drill- ing vessel. The National Science Foundation, which has had the principal responsibility for responding to these proposals, believes that there is strong scientific justification for an extensive deep drilling program. Because of the great expense in the construction or con- version of an appropriate vessel, it is expected that the approved pro- posal will provide for joint use of the deep drilling vessel to serve several oceanographic institutions. Information provided as the scientific background of a drilling pro- gram was presented by the University of Miami to the National Science Foundation. This was extracted from their proposal by Dr. F. F. Koczy of the University of Miami. With the approval of the Chairman, I should like to insert a copy of Dr. Koczy’s statement for the record. In the issue of Science magazine of June 1964, Dr. Elizabeth Rona of the Oak Ridge Institute of Nuclear Studies, has presented a sum- mary of a conference on the geochronology of marine fluvial sedi- ments. This paper is an excellent summary of the progress on the use of radioactivity in dating marine sediments. I should like to request permission to insert a copy of Dr. Rona’s paper in the record at. this time. The ICO is hopeful that it will be possible for the National Science Foundation or other ICO agency to receive approval for funding through the Bureau of the Budget and the Congress for undertaking a program of drilling of deep cores. Mr. Lennon. If there is no objection, this material may be inserted immediately after your statement. Captain Bauer, would you continue? Mr. Baver. Thank you. Another question I would like to ask re- fers to your testimony concerning the movement of radioactivity through the Columbia River. Has the radiation shown an deleterious effects on organisms beyond the mouth of the Columbia River? 86 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Dr. Wa.ien. The answer is “No.” Rather extensive studies by scientists at the General Electric Laboratories at Hanford, Wash., at the University of Washington Laboratory of Radiation Biology, and at the Oregon State University have been made on samples of many kinds of organisms from the ocean mouth beiow Portland and extending for several hundred miles at sea. Traces of zinc 65, chro- mium 51, and occasionally other isotopes that are believed to have originated in the Columbia River have been found in some organisins. The quantities of radioisotopes in marine animals are so low as to be barely detectable. Our existing knowledge of radioactivity and its effects indicates that there must have been no deleterious etfect. Mr. Bauer. My next question is this: Is the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries investigating radiobiological effects on fisheries ? Dr. Wauien. Yes. The Bureau of Commercial Fisheries has worked rather closely with the Atomic Energy Commission for the past several years to study the potential effect of radionuclides on commercial fisheries in the sea. in cooperation with the AKC, the Bureau began work in 1950 at its Biological Laboratory in Beaufort, N.C., to investigate the relationship between radioactivity and fish- eries. The Beaufort Laboratory has generally been supported ap- proximately 50-50 by the Atomic Knergy Commission and the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries. The program has expanded over the years and, in March 1963, it was raised to the status of an independent radiobiological laboratory, which is directed by Dr. Ted Rice.. The personnel of the Laboratory have been cleared for atomic energy information and thus are permitted to carry on experiments that simulate the actual releases of atomic energy materials from projects visualized by the Atomic Energy Commission. The Laboratory has studied the extent of occurrence of radionuclides in the environment as a result of atomic or other contamination of the ocean. They have studied accumulation rates by marine organisms for various radio- nuclides, the extent of retention of various radioisotopes, and the level at which these radioisotopes seem to produce an effect. With the chairman’s permission, I should like to enter for the record the annual report of the Radiobiological Laboratory from the Department of the Interior to the Atomic Energy Commission. This document is dated April 1, 1964, and reviews the scientific accomplishments of the Lab- oratory during the preceding 12 months. Mr. Lennon. We will place this report in the subcommittee files. Captain Bauer, do you have further questions of Dr. Wallen? Mr. Bavsr. This concludes my questions, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Lennon. The subcommittee wishes to thank you, Doctor, for a very excellent and informative statement. (The prepared statement of Dr. Wallen and the material mentioned follow herewith :) : STATEMENT BY Dr. I. EH. WALLEN, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR FOR OCEANOGRAPHY, Mu- SEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY, SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION, AND CHAIRMAN RE- SEARCH PANEL, INTERAGENCY COMMITTEE ON OCEANOGRAPHY Mr. Chairman and members of the committee, on behalf of the members of the Research Panel of the Interagency Committee on Oceanography, I am pleased at this opportunity to report on research achievements in oceanography during the last 2 years. Since the hearing of February and March 1962, there has been some turnover in membership of the Research Panel. Additional members were added in order NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 87 ‘to more competently judge the effectiveness of oceanographic reserach. The jpresent members of the Panel, including myself, are the following : Mr. Boyd H. Olson, U.S. Naval Oceanographic Office. Dr. A. E. Maxwell, Office of Naval Research (ONR), Geophysics (formerly ‘Chairman). Dr. 8S. R. Galler, ONR, Biology Branch. Dr. Robert A. Frosch, Advanced Research Projects Agency. Dr. Roland Smith, Bureau of Commerical Fisheries. Mr. Gilbert Corwin, U.S. Geological Survey. Mr. Theodore Ryan, Coast and Geodetic Survey. Dr. Richard G. Bader, National Science Foundation. Mr. Bernard Berger, Public-Health Service. Mr. Arnold Joseph, Atomic Energy: Comission. Dr. Donald Pritchard (National Academy of Sciences, observer). Dr. Frank Gifford (Weather Bureau, observer). During our last report to you we stated that a subpanel had been established ‘to consider the Federal program in the area of biological oceanography. This -subpanel was not asked to submit a special report. Its efforts were incorpo- rated into the 10-year plan, which has been distributed to you by Dr. Hornig, and in the annual national oceanographic program documents, Interagency Com- mittee on Oceanography Pamphlets No. 11 and 15, which were provided by Dr. Wakelin. Four additional subpanels have been established in the last 2 years to review the Government’s plans in oceanography at the task level. This is in accordance -with the perspectives given you 2 years ago by Dr. Arthur Maxwell. Two of the subpanels have served their function and have gone out of ex- istence.. A-Subpanel on Radiobiology considered the relationships between radio- sactivity research in the Atomic Energy Commission and that of the Public Health Service, National Science Foundation, and other potential sponsors of research in this area. As'a result of several-meetings adequate coordination was effec- tively undertaken within the agencies, and the Subpanel has been disbanded. A second subpanel was established to consider the development of underseas research yehicles. This subpanel prepared a report which is presently being reviewed and edited and should be available within the next 2 months. This report will be concerned with the types of research that may be accomplished with undersea vehicles. It will not consider the many problems of engineering «of the vehicles, which more propery will be discussed by a later speaker. A Subpanel on Microbiology has recently been established to consider that field of study. The plan here, Mr. Chairman, is to attain an understanding of the occurrence of useful antibiotics and other pharmaceuticals from the ocean. ‘The Subpanel will, of course, be concerned with the occurrence and transmission of waterborne diseases and parasites in the ocean. One of the more complex topics that we have been forced to consider is that of ‘air-sea interaction. We feel that an understanding of the energy exchange be- tween the ocean and atmosphere has tremendous implications for the prediction and control-of weather. We are well aware of the necessity of cooperation with -atmospherie scientists and have developed a joint panel with the Interagency Committee on Atomspheric Sciences. This panel has made a preliminary report through the Research Panel to the Interagency Committee on Oceanography and ‘directly to the Interagency Committee on Atmospheric Sciences. Although we have been concerned with whether an apparent two-headed monster, such as this, could function, we have recently established that it is ‘entirely practical for such a committee to prepare planning documents will full joint cooperation between the two parent committees. The funding for research for air-sea interaction, in my opinion, has become responsive to the requirements of the meteorologist and of the oceanographer. Two years ago, Mr. Chairman, we discussed the objectives and plans of the Research Panel. I will not repeat these. I should like rather to talk about the accomplishments in oceanographic research. At the outset I must state that we have only begun to receive data leading to an understanding of major oceanographic problems. All of the accomplish- ments that I mention, although they are significant steps forward, are simply examples of the return which we can expect from a continuing research effort. I will orient my presentation to the five categories of oceanographic research which are listed by Dr. Wakelin on page 14 of his statement. The first one of these is physical properties and motion of the sea. I would like to start this part of my presentation by telling a story. Dr. Allyn Vine of SS NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution prevailed on the Chief of Naval Operations in 1961 to send a message to a nuclear submarine returning from the South Atlantic. This message requested that the submarine, on reaching a point 1° south of the Equator assume a 45° angle at 300 feet depth and maintain a heading of 0° north for 5 minutes. Although puzzled by such a strange order the submarine skipper attempted to do this and found that it was impossible. The Woods Hole scientists had correctly located the submarine in the massive Equatorial current and countercurrent so that pressures on the upper end of the submarine were in one direction and in the lower end of the submarine in the opposite direction. Since that time the equatorial undercurrent has been found to transport about 30 million cubic meters of water per second in a high- speed eastward flow. Having confirmed the existence of a current, similar to the already known Cromwell Current in the Pacific, the scientists were quite eager to determine whether or not a similar current existed in the equatorial area of the Indian Ocean. They have been surprised to discover, during the International Indian Ocean Expedition, that although there were strong currents from time to time in the Indian Ocean, no steady eastward flow was evident. Studies for many years will be necessary to define and to describe the actual flows of these giant marine rivers. It is not unlikely that other large volume, large area ocean cur- rents will be discovered. Many smaller areas of oceanic flow are being located on a continuing basis. The second research category, that of ocean-atmosphere interrelationships, is a most significant one. Here again I would like to cite an example. It has been reported by Dr. Jerome Namias of the Weather Bureau that the unusual weather experienced in much of the Northern Hemisphere may be traced to the phenomena of energy storage and exchange. Oceanographic data located a very large tem- perature anomaly in the North Pacific in the summer of 1962. The temperature averaged as much as 7° higher than usual at the surface of the ocean. Hind- sight tracing of the origin and path of the hurricane which hit Seattle in the fall of 1962 shows that it came directly across, and was apparently related to, the area of anomalous oceanographic temperature. 'These temperatures persisted throughout much of the winter and seemed to be definitely related to the espe- cially cold weather along the eastern coast of the United States and through Western Hurope. These types of anomalies are not common, and our conclusions are tentative. Weshould be prepared to study the next one more completely when it occurs. Such interpretations cause us to be very strongly interested in weather in the ocean. With regard to category 3, biological properties, the oceanographic community is well aware of the potential production of food from the ocean. Biologists are concerned that we are at a very primitive hunting stage when it comes to pre- dicting the location of marine organisms and why they are there. Over the period of historical time, many scientists had become convinced by fishing ex- perience that all of the commerciaily harvestable fishes must be found in the upper 1,000 feet of the ocean. Yet within the past 2 years, with the development of better fishing gear, the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries Laboratory in Seattle has collected fishes in commercially exploitable abundance at a depth of 3,600 feet near the mouth of the Columbia River. Assistance from the United States, and also from a Norwegian fisheries project, has resulted in the development of a $25. million shrimp fishery off the south coast of India. This, of course, is really fishery oceanography and not biological oceanography as we normally think of it. Biological oceanographers have reached conclusions, based on data collected in different places by different persons, that the sound reflection and interference layer in the water, often called the scattering layer, may be due to squid, to jellyfishes, to lantern fishes, or to plankton. Biologists are particularly inter- ested in undersea vehicles because, for the first time, they promise that an observer can combine registration of a sound scattering layer on an echo sounder with observation and identification of the kinds of organisms producing the echo trace. The abundances, kinds, and distributions of biological organisms are so poorly known that our predictions of the numbers and kinds of marine organisms that would be available for exploitation by humans varies through billions of pounds, or even more. It is in this area that we are now concentrating our greatest efforts in terms of trained manpower. However, our results are not really spectacular because of the limited backlog of biological ship time. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 89 The fourth category—structure and history of the sea floor—has enjoyed rather great advances in experimental methods during the past few years. Iso- tope fractioning techniques for determining the rates of accumulation of marine sediments have been: applied to bottom materials from the Pacific, Atlantic, and Indian Oceans. Sediment deposition in the South Pacific is believed to be in the order of 0.3 to 0.6 millimeters per thousand years, an extremely low rate, which is probably related to the relatively low percentage of land in the Southern Hemisphere. By comparison, sedimentation in the North Pacific and in the South Atlantic oecurs at a rate of a few millimeters per thousand years and in the North Atlantic it may be a few centimeters per 1,000 years. Data from the Indian Ocean has been more variable. During the cruises of oceanographic vessels, an echo sounder usually makes traces indicating the more prominent features of the sea bottom. In recent years the stepped-up oceanographic ship activity has resulted in the discovery of many previously unknown sea mounts—submerged peaks arising from the ocean floor. In the Indian Ocean the Russian research vessel Vityaz found that several of the previously located peaks were actually part of an unrecognized undersea mountain range which extended for more than 2,000 miles, stretching from the Bay of Bengal toward the Antarctic seas. Such echo tracings are not completely reliable. In February of this year geologists from the Scripps Institution for Oceanography found that they were grossly mistaken in their interpretation of the shape of Scripps Canyon (off San Diego) from echo soundings. Using a diving saucer, rented from France and flown to California by Navy plane, the scientists were surprised to learn more about Seripps Canyon in 5 days than they had in the hundreds of trips across as well as from the sediment cores taken from the area. Although Project Mohole is not considered to be oceanography, the develop- ment of a capability of taking cores of 1,000 feet or longer has occurred through oceanographic efforts. Oceanographers are very eager to obtain a vessel that will enable them to take long cores throughout the world ocean. Such cores will provide much new information on the structure and history of the earth. With regard to research category 5, the modification of the ocean, we have many ideas but essentially no accomplishments. In addition to weather predic- tion on possible control, one of the most interesting developments in this area is the appearance of a new technique of the use of rhodamine and other dyes to simulate the distribution and mixing rates of radioactive and sewage wastes, which may be introduced into the ocean. Such studies can provide theoretical information of great value in prediction of the effects of detonation of nuclear devices or of accidental venting of nuclear reactors into the ocean. HExperi- ments with dyes are completely safe to conduct and a sufficient number have been completed to justify a special conference on dye distribution, which is planned for August 26-28 of this year. If I may, Mr. Chairman, I would like to conelude with two especially interest- ing discoveries. The first concerns the transmission of sound in water. Not long ago the Lamont Geological Observatory exploded a 1-pound charge of TNT in the Indian Ocean. Listening devices off Bermuda were able to pick up the sound of this explosion some 3 hours and 45 minutes later, thus confirming a theory of sound transmission which had little support and is still very poorly understood. To the biologist a fascinating discovery in the Indian Ocean concerns a very large area in the Arabian Sea which is productive of biological organisms near the surface yets offers a tremendous puzzle. Apparently no organisms live on the bottom in this area, and for a substantial distance above the bottom, because the zone is devoid of oxygen. This oxygenless zone occasionally may approach the surface, to cause tremendous kills of biological organisms. We would like to know whether, why, and how this occurs. It would certainly be interesting to know the source of the organic matter which uses up the oxygen, particularly since the land masses adjoining the area are mostly desert. Although many papers have been published as a result of research in ocean- ography, which has been encouraged by our committee, the results appear in perhaps a thousand journals and in large numbers of Government reports. They are not easy to locate. The Interagency Committee on Oceanography has initi- ated a project to develop a bibliography of publications, stemming from the national oceanography program during calendar years 1962 and 1963 as well as sebernennt years. This bibliography should be available within the next few months. 90 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 SCIENTIFIC BACKGROUND OF DRILLING PROGRAM AS PRESENTED IN A PROPOSAL TO: THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION (Excerpts selected by F. F. Koezy from proposal written by C. Hmiliani, June 1964) The earth is a geophysical, geochemical, and biological system of such com- plexity that less is known about its structure, composition, and dynamics than. about those of most other celestial bodies. The complexity of the earth as a planet rests essentially upon a threefold basis: (1) its mass, large enough to: have permitted the differentiation of a core, mantle, and crust, and the produc- tion and retention of a substantial hydroatmosphere; (2) its heat balance, per- mitting surface water to exist in all three phases; and (3) its angular velocity and axis orientation resulting in a diurnal cycle of convenient frequency. a =, 99Y no, SSBlO azisinbayy wospayauAy See cenit | Te pie * te ay eats Rg ee A eT | eG | RT Tee TS oe BE oT EET eT ae Ted Ce LE ne U0zING vP6r €F61 br6T ony i = MON | ST Sil II GG 092 eg Or COG: ed ae Sea eee oe em buym ‘od COG |cimeien (0) eae IT GG 092 ee Or COT a Alfa Se ee a Sag soir Ltd ‘III sselo ‘od 9961 | op---7> CP 88 S19 ‘T oP 1 Peeing ears Gas aye eer o eT Layo ‘od 996T = |-77 op7--> GF 88 G19 ‘T oF eI GG eo | ee Seige Ip eee on eae 10Y}03. NID ‘od 9961 | --7 OD oF 8e P6L‘T oP ia NG Ce = aa | ae ees ye eee poured JON otter AGE [P= p= 9¢ 68 000‘ 68 9 6CCk = cep ee ae ar ee ees Lapuy yor -souve00 pou] pue AydesisompAH | OBE =| OD seme 9¢ 6E 006 ‘T 88 91 OCG) tac a ee ag eee ore HE ee ‘od P9BE | ODimes +9 68 G08 ‘¢ ray 81 GORE oa eee ee Siro oat ae tee er eae 49009817 ‘od i 2:]) a ODeiean #9 68 G08 ‘¢ rae 81 COSssie (ae |eer arin ce or pee 4aydv160u0990 ‘0d 096T =| 77> MON | 99 If OST ‘g oF 91 COCs tases lee See re a Lohaaing “Aq Iqedvo opydvisouvso0 xejdu0pD CPG mies eae dAV | #9 tPF 009 ‘Z Iv FI ClO linn ae soo 5 =o oe ey ape 199uo1g aa iT SSB 108 MoD, quoul [[e19A0 UOISSI JI ed V 9oinog oe -oov dsiq weed qyeid qysue'T, OUIBN qyuoure[durog fiaaingy aapoan pun yspon “g'AQ STASSHA OIHAVAVONVAIO AO NOILVAAdO 133 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 “SoyoUIM pues $o110,e10qe[ d1ydeidouve00 qIIM poddinbe sured S[esseA 1014B}S UB9800 PUB SIO BOIG90T 000‘0S$ ‘waaib1aanq o0e[dor 04 [OSSOA 1OJ ApNys UsIsEqd WVYXOO0Ud S96T UVHA TVOSIA GHSOd0Ud SS u@( Tuva aaa ———— al “Aqitqedeo orydeizoueeo0 =I eaters! ch6r | GOVM | 02 PEG 00g ‘9 €9 6G COC aN ay Sree scat oa ben eeu rin PULNYPLONT “AQIIGedvo o1ydeiz0uee00 YIM Jopue} Aong 1 /;) Gn ATCO) WeANG || teen en mine ne 8F 000 ‘T && &T OST as ESS ao oo Se aes ane picepear uaa sbLa0n TAAL EAA epi ne oa erat £16 ‘T GP iat UC Rae esa" aaa eek PIS RSLS DjOpUayY :SSBlO ayYDT Ce ee ee a earres| (a are ae ace mal coment (econcemecnaemeicioeats|( Gaceceiaorecetiacce ic recie rexcaieenans' | ane errenes aaah ncaa aI Pie NOUS burlag aa [a ae are Ue ae ie ae cal strain asap apie | Aan Cicada |EDIT GE | DR cae ae eae WDYsS4a~) ATOSE RS 89s | SEP SSO a eae Ce a a i eee | aes ee | Bae aaa eal |t Sa ae Pale Oe Oe | GE EES AE RSG DLLDIDLOT ha tee [oe pen ape rare ee al (eae eae its ep cok tm aT allege Sart PR es eo ae te ee ee ya0ey 97780), ‘gneds A10}810Q CT HR) RIS BRS ie |e, a Us See ee eepege es ege cy eee en hapa mae ee ea hye ci aa | a Re ced aA oP ee RR a 9 ee pia cere PTUT 400) pues soyourM o1ydeis0use00 TIM PS a Ye eg eo Re = eee ee |e Bt Ne SE Dos ol ell See | ee ee 5 re peddtnbe s[essaA u017e4S LX @) EP6r SS a dAVM a i Nt cel 008 Ye 167 FI T1gé SC NC te 098D)D ‘1epue oue[deeg ID |S Rae See Se | NE Ee aR OR RSET 2 CSS GIR | EO ae (2 REIS REESE HRLORIIG Se eas | Soe a Seca Cae RE ae Pore ts haunZ, Pera WG eS OS Se Oe | a tas || 7 cane Ramen anaes | Ganon em iar lp earecs eee [ Clelee cia ancic es || i a ale ot ang ee ae ate on 7aqdungd, SR Ee ee Oe I eae aaa 5 Se area (7 aT Le BS Se IT GE REE Sal |= Sie | Sn Re ey ee ee danuads LEG Tee list saunas WOGUMA, [PT erat 128% Ty GT [RGD tee FGM ga ee er ae wmDybuy wsselo Aunja19ag Os MOID Uhorjovs [[e190A40 TOISSI AL osV 90In0g “| -voe[dstq. weed qJeid Yysue'y] OUle Ny quowle[dui0pD plony ISV0n “SJ ) STASSHA OIHAVINONVAIO AO NOILVAAdTO NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 134 es “sorzoyusy pue ‘A30[010090U0 | ‘Aysrureyo ‘ASolOIq YorVeesel Ue8VO WOISSTTAL “(098° 4800) "(OST 9800) Yoreese1 UL8DC “PO6T Ie94 [eosy Ul popuny drys jo 3uiddimbq Peeters tee a ee jueuleae[der Woba1C WVUDOUd 9961 UVAA IVOSIA GASOdOUd *eA0Q® Pajsl] JOU SMO} NOT ULY} sso] Jo JOoulede[sIp v YAM sdiys AO OL AToyewIKo1dd y— aLON quoule;du09 quoul -oov[dsiq. ureog qyerd [1e19A0 q4sueT FS SS ae ae poured JON, eal oatest een ae UDpLOor LLDIS. praoqe Agape ae seen apes jyuomiede|der ‘aupmojaqr oon a o-oo one ------------------- asomnjaq tooo n nse n ana ------------- spjbnoqg 42017 ~--------------------------- 919M “_ abL00 Pe tin er ORE RSS Te ad 2agiy “H 8a740YD (2 Shee aaa See AI 88010q17 od AL ee eee SILMOYSIY [DIIEWUWOD fo noding STHSSHA OIHAVYVYONVANO AO NOILVAAdAO 135 NATIONAL, OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 “YoIVOSOI [COTSOTOI OJ [OSSeA [[VUIS & JO UOTZOLIA}SUOD OY} epNyoUt TIF. yor ‘sdrys soy 0o0‘009‘T$ Ajoyeumtxordde eptaoid 0} sjoodxe UoMepunog souslog [euONeN WV8dDOUd 2961 UVAA IVOSIA GasOdoOud *SUOT{NINYSUL 1940 0} potjddns used oAvy s}v0q Je[[vUIs sfesseA sofeuUr Jo 4SIT 0AOQ®B 0} UOT}IPpe UI— ALON ‘THeMer JO AjIsSIOATU() UTM poqsyy ot “sddI10g 0} posoAT[ap aq OF, 4 “UBSITOITA JO APISIOATUL) IATA poysT |g “APISIOATU PsloyueIg YIM poysyy 1 ‘IAD 0} PoroAT[ap oq OF, “APSIOATUL) OYNG 0} PoroAl[op oq OW, ¢ “APSIOATU) 098419 UOFIIO YITM pojsy’T + "IN 2p “V SBXOT, UJIM pojst’T ¢ *JUIRITY JO AJSIOATUL) YA poysy’y ; ‘IOHM UIT poysiy 1 PAGdee eo tSTo5 U0 Onl hee Gate s|L ques Ones |aaeer ac eeibaee (23> alpewcsereea ei@as saci or NOT, FOC” |ieeeeee SN ee ee ee ee SESE RTI | STIS | SOIREE ISIS OR OSIM SOSSTIOOS 6 Pouleu JON PPOL Pm Be op etm || lee nll Wan er | a ee eS So | Om SS SESS SOO D RASC SOR IOC OS DON ON TE ER 8 SBIS pueluy O&6T Bea UO Os ie ane nil pet Police fa alfa oem b> cee ell eatin 1 BBA OL ieee OD ee igen ute aee || pees Sanita | [eapen ecucaal aera toes || hae Mees Seal Sao eee es 9 UBIVUIB)BOD “yortosor orydersoure09 a ee ee Db ie Sol oe ee Seamed ee dR Sk Ge ce a Be 9 pee ON een [pon OS Sa a ee | Pe | iho |S See | aeee ee Sa | ec ear See Sa ee ee 2 SOULUIETY EV OTs | Pao stoN COO Nf pens out io) 1| ho aaa cee cll fun sbsc paeae|f pda Menai uae cal eell Es ea a ¢ Amasittd ZBL |77- => FROIN a PSII SIS | SIRO SEOITE IG | OS SIO SO SSIS EI OSSD SIS ISIS IOS “til spusyy oe6l 777-77 op----- GT COLE eee al eee nae 5 essere a SL (Obes ieeed || mS CREM ae etme are netecn eee aC DMD Lea KUO PCy L961 ~ UOISIVAMOD | ZE 008 ‘E Tg 02 DOC rear ne | ataER = ae talkers Se Seo a Sree ean eae ae as urUe ya a a8 i ees Re ae 5 queu queul [[@10A0 TOISSI PAL osV 90in0g -9[dul0D -ooedsiq. leadeheyey yeod Yjsue'T OUle NT wounpuno | aouavg [DU0uD AT STASSHA OIHAVUNONVAVO AO NOILVYAdIO NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 136 ‘sdjys yorvesod AABN YIM pojsyT 1 ee SS *qoreosor O1Ydeis0ue00 O POO |e 2 > (0) 0) aeeckn ett el (a ee a Io me Co OL COieiat “Tal eiecee een oe Nilay, WeMBE JO AjIsIOATa() ‘soxe] YeeIH ‘yoresseyy PPO Poe Ope Ga ess is a | ome eee || Ege oe | aceon aie | re ee cg “--""=snag puDpsy sUSZINOI], JO AZIsIOATa.) ‘od CANOE = | unas (0) 9) glee} (is cae ee Sali gS a as = c6 Ie a a See oe COlee- | eer aes puhyy :APISIOATA() YIOX MON *qorsesel OTyde1s00890 O Og6— | op a1 SI 022 8 LT CETRe co) |PeSresaeacoes DIDA aL, :AqSIOATA) Psoyueyg €r61 WOU FSRSEY EO) fh TOSS ne ihe wr: 2 =| oe eteeanes ie fs eel RR rar nee e aS hea Ge ES Tae pjoUusoy -(Suyures} yuepn)s eee) pus “juemidojeaep yueumnsysut L261 Pea 8 Cl 22k ¥ OL CZI Bb g tee ae a ee ae LD) ‘Aaqsyueyo ‘ASOTOTG *m0940q ‘A190 PROL = |7 Suv | & 62 00T % Ww GT CIS TEST aaa eS ree CIS UDYyD “mAGIeq) Yyoreoser oyduIsoUvIIO |) Zoey |-------- MON | 9% 8z 00r Z +P OL OI Ren ee eee IE syunyy [esaye yoo | 6 LT ggg 83 61 (Ay Ee ee | eae ae eee wae 2 SFR I 84U0nv SMOTINAYsUY IYydeis0uvI0O I[OH SPOOM f . (Bucuzeojoud m09}0q + ‘sojouseur ‘“n0yyUPT! ‘soyqsnooe) qoreesel Oye OREO PPrOL UWO[SIOATOD | ET ST 9¢8 ze OL O8T “quapisy, :£104e10qe'] OUlIV Py }4esUeSeIIe NT “SUTUre1} Juep -njs pue yoreeser ofydeid0ue900 €26T | yeoqTTes | LT 61 FEL €& LI (ieee. || = oa eee ee ( CORRE fh siti Moe eee eee ee ee ee ne ee eee ee ee a ee eee ee eee ser sso e se eseea ES ee easier | = Seesee ares | AS Se Seat | ees ameec ere eS Soe i :A£10JCAIOSGO [VOIsO[OeyH) JUOMIeT 5 ik *(queul -dojeaep yuemmijsur ‘Arstureyo ‘soyjsnooe) yoreesel ofqdessouv90O Mi pee dAV | ¥ 8P os % oP cI On Riemer es 8491) Len Se OTE oe . ES | aes op OGRE | Sr COR ea perce a el irre ee ed eisai | Toscan sakes cmv ste nel q 113 Ug fedissserelh orydeazouve0{ Sh6I =: [777 7 -Oop G e CET IZ OL (yy Gees Pee ae eee, pple STUICITAL JO AfISIOATU “qorvesel o1ydv.1g008900 aan law =a ap i Giese |W a 5 em (75 earns || Faraie tae | ee eee ost Boar aie SOUND) PY :2B2[[0D Be bi deaee . Pr6L (LLOTSIOANTLO 6) 5 | ree one oe |e en nna O28 Ss leee ee lee (2): Sees pean ete oan eos 4 Ue oqqdexaouves0{ 196t |7-77- IMeLL, | 8 9 #1 rae 6 (Gs ie Paget eae aac eeneco rao DUOIP. :AJISIOATUL) 99249 T0Z010 aa a A | (ese ake ge Se pene | em ica ol | Eee ene poe | eee ae en ee | ee | eee ema (OG Wy) ReLOS@ ULOM Ty . TAOIE Pa op g 6 OLT GG 0 OSB: SS TEe Fee oe oe L—DULjODT -9 OE a eed Eee ver MWOISIOAMO() | F OL OVirAa taco ies ts omen aa eee a COT ee TET TETAS VEIT D40]80U09Q, [MSA Neel SHOE [oar WV | #1 81 006 ge fat 1 aneeeeey kcaeetaianas (ir iy eT cei woztLoF] pee Dy AZoposoojour *Aaystuneyo HOLL. (ee WLV | St SI 166 ee FI Chl. LISS FHBABVIIE oIBIE Hone TO Gs pO AZojOWq) Yoreeser opydeiso0ue0O ait (Ree auv | # OF 610 ‘% OF oT C1g ee |= eeasgT aOR asa TEE obs Pr6r UOIsSIOAMO() | FT 8I CCStuepiinecs, |e emerge OL OST HAST 57 SES ee aisspby :Aydeig0uV8000 Jo MOINyWYsuy sddts10g IPE INI ISI III SII Se Ee (PI IFS II in ra rae |b, toa GP me Bl Lec RL Ls bo a Ee Eee oS (103Y) wopburysoM “BuTUTe1} yHOp { €r6t | ~ op Oc ugmesaearamal |e ae ( e-eremmscs| tones mate hay (ete eee or ¢9 Rae a SET Ca = ee ETS! HOH “njs pues yoreeser sjydeisouvs09 Pe6r UWO{SIOAMOD | 12 II 0cL 1% &1 PUL ohivoig|ot a1o5ano OIG ia o 3 i aa zi eo Ay *H0}sUTY T T els) MIO qu0ul [(@19A0 UOISSIPAL osV 901n0g -20e[dsiq. meg qyerd qjsue', Olle NI quoulo[d a0 SUOTINIYSUL 990A T STASSHA OIHAVUPONVHIO AO NOILVAAAO NATIONAL: OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 137 Mr. Lennon. Our next witness is, in the absence of Dr. Woodrow Jacobs of the National Oceanographic Data Center. I wonder who 1s here to make the presentation for Dr. Jacobs? I understand he 1s hospitalized. i Mr. Dusacu. Iam Harold Dubach. Iam the deputy and D. Jacobs has been ill for about 2 months. Mr. Lennon. We are glad to have you. Would you give your full name to the reporter and we assume you will use the statement that 1s now being handed to the members of the committee. You may have had ‘some part in the preparation of this statement and for that rea- son it is very probable that you would like to go through and pick out the parts that you would like to lay specific emphasis upon and then, of course, Dr. Jacobs’ full statement will be included as part of the hearing record. Whatever is your choice. ~ Would you want to take it in its entirety or go through it and pick out the highlights of it? Of course, the whole text of it will be put in the record. . Mr. Dupacu. I believe I would prefer just to hit some highlights, if T may. © Mr. Lennon. All right, lay specific emphasis on the things you think we ought to be advised of. STATEMENT OF HAROLD W. DUBACH, DEPUTY, NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC DATA CENTER Mr. Dusacn. If you will recall in the last report, the Data Center’s governing body is an advisory board on which sit representatives of each of the sponsoring agencies and two representatives of the National Academy of Sciences. In January of 1964, Dr. John Lyman replaced Mr. Howard Eckles as Chairman of this Board. Also, since the last report to your committee, changes have been made in the representa- tion by the Atomic Energy Commission and the National Academy of Sciences. Mr. Joseph and Dr. Kask have replaced Dr. Schultz and Dr. Shaefer who are the respective representatives of those agencies. I should also like to mention that in fiscal year 1964 the Coast Guard became one of the NODC sponsors. During fiscal year 1965 three other agencies have indicated their desire to become sponsors of NODC. These are the Geological Survey, Coastal Engineering Re- search Center, and the Department of Health, Education, and Wel- fare. Our sponsors in fiscal year 1965 will then total 10. Each year the NODC prepares a summary of its work and accomplishments as an annual report which is presented to the advisory board and sub- mitted to the sponsoring agencies. With your permission, Mr. Chair- man, I would like to submit the annual reports for fiscal years 1962 and 1963 for the record. Mr. Lennon. Without objection, that will be included as as part of your statement in the record. (See apps. 8 and 9, p. 623 and p. 655.) Mr. Dusacu. Recording our accomplishments: In the 3 years since the inception of the NODC we have been working toward a greater adaptability of processing systems already in use, as well as attempt- ing to diversify into fields not presently being processed with any great degree of uniformity in the United States. 35-377— 6410 138 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Working toward this goal of ready accessibility, we have begun to convert the previous punched card system for physical-chemical sta- tion data into a new magnetic tape system. This will enable us to assemble these data so that we may retrieve the valuable temperature, salinity, density, and sound velocity information at a more rapid rate than ever before. We have, therefore, initiated a program of digitiz- ing these data into a magnetic tape system of uniform units which will enable us, with the aid of a computer, to provide information in a few hours which would otherwise take months or years to tabulate. Our present archive contains physical and chemical data from about 260,000 oceanographic stations which is contained on over 5 million punched cards. When these data are distributed over the world’s oceans in all seasons, one can see that there are many areas of the world where little or no data are available. We are attempting to fill some of these gaps through a vigorous acquisition program and exchange with other nations. These data are being processed and archived at the rate of three-quarters of a million punchcards each year. Our archives of bathythermograms, or BT’s as we know them, now contain approximately 850,000 analog temperature records for depths up to 900 feet. We are continuing to process approximately 30,000 each year from survey ships or other vessels for which there is an urgent and immediate need. Emphasis has been placed on digitizing BT data and putting it into a form that will make it available for computer programs. Proceeding with a new system, we have digitized approximately 50,000 of the existing archives of 850,000 analog tem- perature records on a pilot project basis. Over 2 million data points are involved and are contained on approximately 250,000 punched cards. Since the system has been examined and approved by members of the oceanographic community, we plan to step up production during the coming year, processing into a magnetic tape storage system what will be the equivalent of more than 100,000 observations. Because new data are being received at the rate of about 90,000 observations per year, this effort is still far short of what will be required to complete the ultimate goal of digitizing the entire backlog and keeping up with the contemporary inflow. A variety of other data are received in manuscript and other forms. Standard storage-retrieval systems and determination of standard recording forms have yet to be determined for these data. Nevertheless, these data are organized in a logical manner, usually geographically and by data type and date, and are available to the oceanographic community on demand in their existing form, which is usually a manuscript log-type form. Development of appropriate storage-retrieval systems for these data will proceed as our research and development of systems for data types now in work are completed. In January of this year, we began geological and biological produc- tion ona pilot study basis. Core, grab, and dredge data from approxi- mately 2,100 geological stations have been put into the geological storage-retrieval system for test purposes. Similarly, approximately 1,200 biological stations, represented by 5,000 punchcards, have been entered into the biological storage-retrieval system also for testing purposes. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 139 To summarize the chief contributions of the Data Center since its inception, I would emphasize three points: First, through our efforts there has been increasing emphasis on the use of standardized procedures in recording and reporting. In the past, oceanography has been plagued by a multitude of recording forms and incompatible observation and reporting procedures. The NODC fortuitously has turned out to be the catalyst that has brought the diversified oceanographic interests together to do something concrete about this long-standing problem. The Data Center will continue to sponsor and cooperate in these endeavors. Second, from the beginning, the Data Center has emphasized the application of quality control procedures to the data processing tech- niques, so that the scientist is assured of receiving the highest quality data possible under the circumstances. Third, we have emphasized personal service. Services include pro- viding technical information, educational materials, and advice be- yond that represented by the simple provision of hard data. Then just a word about our services. Regarding our service to the oceanographic community, the NODC has been called on many times to furnish statistically summarized and analyzed oceanographic data for industrial, private, and Government organizations which need in- formation on the environment for various applications and uses. I would like to give you some idea as to the volume of the reimburs- able work performed at the NODC. During fiscal year 1961 our re- imbursable funds amounted to about $3,000; 2 years later during fiscal year 1963, they increased to over $200,000. It must be pointed out, however, that these figures include governmental and nongovern- mental requests for services. Details on the services supphed are given in the annual report, previously submitted. At this time I would like to submit for introduction into the record some of the other publications produced by the Data Center. Mr. Bauer. Mr. Chairman, I suggest that the inclusions in the rec- ord be by reference rather than by printing. Mr. Pewuy (presiding). Without objection, that will be included by reference only and made available. Mr. Dupacu. Yes, sir. I think that these are referenced in the full context that represents Dr. Jacobs’ statement. Now I would like to outline briefly our progress in research and development. We have developed a holding-recall system for indexing core, grab, and dredge samples. Additionally, a system for handling the chemical analyses of sea bottom materials has been completed and currently is being circulated for approval of the oceanographic community. In work is the development of a system for handling the physical prop- erties of sediments. Significant advances have been made in the de- velopment of holding-recall systems for hydrobiological data. De- veloped—and approved by our Interagency Advisory Board—to date are holding-recall systems to handle environmental data, phytoplank- ton primary productivity, phytoplankton pigment data, zooplankton data, and benthos data. Progress is being made in the field of physical-chemical data as well. A holding-recall system has just been completed for drift bottle 140 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 data. The NODC has worked very closely with Mr. Dean Bumpus of the Woods Hole and Dr. John Norcross of the Virginia Institute of Marine Sciences. Also under development are schemes for handling nearshore oceanographic data, instrument-measured current data, and nonnutrient chemical data. It should be pointed out that all holding-recall systems are developed in concert with the oceanographic community. Extremely gratifying is the cooperation the NODC has received ‘from the oceanographic community which is reflected in their willingness to serve on the various ad hoc committees formed in conjunction with our develop- mental work. Quality control of oceanographic data is the third item I would like to touch on. Now that the NODC has had the experience of nearly 3 years of working with various types of oceanographic data in a multitudimous variety of formats, we can rationally approach the problem of develop- ing and implementing automated quality controls. I do not mean to imply that until this time there has been no application of quality control, but practically all of it has been applied subjectively. With our present backlogs of data and our present and future acquisition effort, we would be naive to believe that we could continue to apply subjective quality controls. To have applied automated quality con- trols at the outset of our operation would also have been naive since no end products had been defined and we had practically no guidelines for total systems. Now we feel we are ready to begin with an automated system. Shortly, we expect to have in operation a computer program which will check some items of a routine nature which at the present time are monitored by our oceanographers. This will then give additional time for these oceanographers to assess the scientific plausibility of the data. One of the first attempts at automated quality control that we will implement shortly is a program which will check the quality of work done by contractors who are digitizing the BT work for the NODC. This will not only insure that a major contractor is capable of performing quality work, but will also provide a quality check as the work progresses. We are making some inroads on the problem of quality control of oceanographic station data. We have machine plotted all the tem- perature-salinity relationships for the historical data for the Indian Ocean and are currently funding for a similar analysis for the Pacific Ocean. From these plots we are generating envelopes of acceptable limits which for the time being will be used in our subjective quality control program. ‘This is to serve as a first step in the generation of a mathematical computer for the subjective approach. Just about a year ago we were able to demonstrate very dramatically how quality control can pay off through rapid communication systems. During the Equalant I and II phases of the international cooperative investigations of the tropical Atlantic known as ICITA, in 1963, the NODC received, on a daily basis, meteorological and oceanographic messages from ships participating in the surveys. During these sur- veys, we accomplished what we believe to be a “first” in oceanography— that is, the radio receipt of a complete oceanographic station within a matter of hours after the station had been occupied. These were then NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 141 continually received at the rate of one per day. Receipt of data at the present time may vary from as much as 1 month to several years after the data are taken. The basic reduced data were fed to a computer and the computations for density, dynamic depth, specific volume anomaly, and sound velocity were made as were interpolations of these values for internationally accepted standard depths. This in itself demonstrated that an oceanographic program for almost instantane- ous receipt of data was feasible. As the surveys progressed, the NODC developed an evaluation message which was communicated back to the ship at sea. During the Equalant II, both an American vessel and an Argentine vessel daily transmitted oceanographic data to the NODC. The messages returned to these ships consisted of an evaluation of the observed data against the historic data and served as a means of intership comparison of data. It is interesting to note that the observed data received from both ships showed a bias of very small magnitude in the same direction. The implication of this was that both ships were collecting high quality data. The finale of this experiment in quality control and communications occurred on September 19, 1963, during a combined operation of the Washington Laboratory of the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries, NASA, and the NODC. On that day, with time available on the Syncom II satellite communication system, the BCF ship, Geronimo, radioed station data to the Kingsport which was the Syncom surface station, which in turn communicated the data to Washington via Syn- com IT. The data were computed and evaluated by the NODC and salinities were found to deviate significantly from what would be the expected norm for the area. In other words, either a hitherto undis- covered oceanographic phenomenon was occurring in the area or some- thing was wrong with the chemical analysis. Shortly after the Geron- imo received the evaluation message—which was returned in about an hour—the oceanographers aboard that ship found that their salinome- ter was malfunctioning. With your permission, Mr. Chairman, I would at this time like to introduce for the record copies of the messages and some of the press reports of this experiment. In December 1963, Dr. Spilhaous, who is well known in the oceanographic community, presented it in his “Our New Age” syndicated strip which appeared in the Washington Post and other newspapers. Inasmuch as it costs so much to occupy a single oceanographic sta- tion, any program which can give a scientist an instantaneous evalua- tion and quality control of the data he has just taken pays for itself many times over. Once the scientist has left the station, he can never be really sure whether the data he has obtained are worthless or may reveal some new secret of the sea unless he goes back to the same spot and repeats his observations—and this at times at great cost. The NODC is constantly striving to insure the quality of the data both at the collection source and at the shoreside processing facility. One final word, if I may, on the NODC plans for the future. One of the major objectives of the NODC is the adoption by the oceanographic community at large of standardized coding forms; for this reason, in designing coding forms for use by NODC in data process- ing, the cooperation of as wide a spectrum as possible of the oceano- graphic community has been enlisted. NODC will continue to advance 142 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 this objective and the use of standardized forms will facilitate: data processing and thus enhance the early usefulness of the data, to scientists. Another objective concerns the development of new and exotic in- strumentation, producing new and different types of data output. The NODE will continue to work with the Navy’s Instrumentation Center, and the Interagency Instrumentation Panel, and others concerned with the development-of new instrumentation to insure that the data. prod- ucts on one hand and data processing and archiving facilities on the other hand arecoordinated. NODC will continue to develop its capabilities for handling physica] and marine biological and geological-geophysical data in cooperation with leading scientists in all fields, and with respect to both digital data and nondigital information. NODC will continue to develop quality control procedures designed to enhance the quality of its data products. The NODC must discover funding procedures and manpower re- sources to reduce the accumulated backlog of oceanographic data, the bulk of which was inherited at the time of its establishment in Janu- ary 1961. NODC will strive to improve its communication systems with the leading oceanographic laboratories and organizations in the United States and to expand its exchange programs with foreign organiza- tions. It will continue through Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission and the World Data Center system to improve acquisition and exchange of data. Regular exchange of data began in 1961 with activities in some 18 countries; now our exchange program includes activities in some 40 countries. NODC will continue to explore better means of information retriev- al, mechanical, photoelectronic, manual, and combinations: thereof, which will speed up the availability of data and information to the user. This concludes my report, Mr. Chairman, and. I am now available for any questions you may have. Mr. Petuy. Thank you, Mr. Dubach. I was wondering when you were referring to the problem of. funding procedures and of man- power resources reducing the backlog, how are you, as against the back- log which you inherited in 1961? Have you reduced the backlog, or are you just keeping up with the present data that comes in, or are you actually making progress ? Mr. Dupacu. I think in some areas we are holding our own. By this I would restrict this to the station data and in some measure BT data. In the areas like geology and biology these have never been touched in any volume before and so we are beginning to make a little impact in these areas. Regarding station data, when we ere business in 1961 there was an estimated 300,000 oceanographic stations of which we had roughly 100,000 in our. files. As you can,see from the record we have now 250, 000, approximately, but the volume has increased; there are now estimated to be around 350,000 to 400,000 oceanogr aphic stations. Our first priority in all of our processing is applied to contemporary data over historic data simply because, from the response in the oceano- graphic community, this is where the current interest lies primarily. I NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 143 am not implying ‘that there is no interest in historic data. There’ is some, and when there is this interest exhibited we proceed to. give precedence to historic data in selected areas to fill the gap and provide the service that is needed. Mr. Petuy. In other words, yen are trying to take care of the area where there is the most demand ¢ Mr. Dupacu. Yes, sir. Mr. Petiy. Thank you. Mr: Bauer, I think, has several questions he would like to ask. . Bly oc Mr. Bauer. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. f Now, as I understand the structure of the NODC, you are under the management control of the Oceanographer of the Navy; is that cor- rect ? _ Mr. Dupacu. Heis our administrative executive. Mr. Bauer. Who supplies the money for the salaries? | | Mr. Dusacu. All of the sponsors jointly fund the NODC opera- tion and’as I understand the budget, it is not compartmentalized into salaries, contracts, and so forth and soon. This is in essence a pooled resource from which salaries are drawn, from which contracts are drawn, from which supplies are drawn, and so forth and so on. Mr. Bauer. Now, that leads, of course, to the situation of how is your personnel billet structure handled? Are the billets taken out of the Navy Oceanographic Office or are the billets created for NODC in the civil service structure, because oftentimes it is more difficult to get a personnel allowance than it is money. Mr. Dusacu. The billets are assigned by the Navy. Mr. Bauer. In other words, the operation of NODC although funded by the joint venture, we’ll say, still take personnel billets from the Navy’s Oceanographic Office, is that not correct? Mr. Dupacu. That is correct. Mr. Bauer. Is that not more or less a constraint upon the growth of the Navy’s Oceanographic Office ? Mr. Duszacu. Well, I do not know about the Navy Oceanographic Office. All I can speak for would be the NODC, but we have had no problem in this regard in our working togetherness with the Oceanog- rapher, he has been most helpful in this regard. Mr. Bauer. I am wondering why the billet. structure was not handled the same way as the pay structure. At least an individual billet structure established for NODC. Do you know of any reason why that wasnot done? — Mr. Dusacu. I do not know, Mr. Bauer. The charter does not specify this; all it specifies is the money ratios and I do not know the details of why it was set up this way. Mr. Baurr. Now, just how does NODC fit into the ICO structure— or does it? Mr. Dusacu. Originally, as I understand it, there was a Data Proc- essing Panel in the ICO. Once this Panel had completed its work I believe the ICO released its authority over the Panel and from that day on an Advisory Board was established which acts more or less as a governing board for the Director of the NODC. iis Now, many of the people who sit on this Advisory Board also sit on the ICO group. 144 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Mr. Bauer. Is there any reason why the ICO could not act as the advisory board of the NODC? Mr. Dusacu. I think this would have its problems because we get down to some very fundamental decisions in data processing and how we are doing, where we go from here, and this type of thing. T do not know that the ICO would want to become this intimately in- volved with day-to-day working operations and policy guidance. Mr. Bauer. It could be handled in the same way that the Ships Panel is handled, could it not? Mr. Dusacu. I suspect, I do not know. I would have to defer this question to the ICO. Mr. Bauer. Now, what does the management control by the Ocean- ographer of the Navy consist of ? Mr. Duzsacu. Pretty much housekeeping types of problems. They do our bookkeeping work for us; they do our hiring and this type of thing—our personnel work for us. This prevents a duplication of effort in having a separate little administrative office set up to do this particular job. They take care of our space requirements and all of these types of things. Plus we go through Navy channels for adher- ence to regulations—this type of thing—Government regulations. Mr. Baver. And they also give you the billet structure that you have? Mr. Dusacn. Yes, sir. Mr. Bauer. That isall I have, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Drewry. No questions. Mr. Petty. Then we will thank you for giving us a very informa- tive report. 7 (Mr. Dubach’s prepared statement follows :) STATEMENT OF Harotp W. DusBacH, DEpuTY DIRECTOR, NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC DATA CENTER My name is Harold Dubach and I am substituting for Dr. Jacobs of the National Oceanographic Data Center (NODC) who is recovering from an ex- tended illness of some 6 weeks. I would like to submit his statement for in- clusion in the record at this time. I will attempt to cover what I believe are the highlights. INTRODUCTION ‘As you will recall from the last report, the Data Center’s governing body is an Advisory Board on which sit representatives of each of the sponsoring agencies and two representatives of the National Academy of Sciences. In January of 1964, Dr. John Lyman replaced Mr. Howard Eckles as Chairman of this Board. Also, since the last report to your committee, changes have been made in the representation by the Atomic Energy Commission and the National Academy of Sciences. Mr. Joseph and Dr. Kask have replaced Dr. Schultz and Dr. Schaefer who are the respective representatives of those agencies. I should also like to mention that in fiscal year 1964 the Coast Guard became one of the NODC sponsors. During fiscal year 1965 three other agencies have indicated their desire to become sponsors of NODC. These are the Geological Survey, Coastal Engineering Research Center, and the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Our sponsors will, in fiscal year 1965, total 10. Hach year the NODC prepares a summary of its work and accomplishments as an anual report which is presented to the Advisory Board and submitted to the sponsoring agencies. With your permission, I would like to submit the annual reports for fiscal year 1962 and 1963 for the record. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 145 ACCOMPLISHMENTS First, let me present our production accomplishments. In the 3 years since the inception of NODC, we have been working toward the greater adaptability of processing systems already in use, as well as attempting to diversify into fields not presently being processed with any great degree of uniformity in the United States. Working toward this goal of ready accessibility, we have begun to convert the previous punched card system for physical-chemical station data into a new magnetic tape system. This will enable us to assemble these data so that we may retrieve the valuable temperature, salinity, density, and sound velocity infor- mation at a more rapid rate than ever before. We have, therefore, initiated a program of digitizing these data into a magnetic tape system of uniform units which will enable us, with the aid of a computer, to provide information in a few hours which would otherwise take months or years to tabulate. Our present archive contains physical and chemical data from about 260,000 oceanographic stations contained on over 5 million punched cards. When these data are distributed over the world’s oceans in all seasons, one can see that there are many areas of the world where little or no data are available. We are attempting to fill some of these gaps through a vigorous acquisition program and exchange with other nations. These data are being processed and archived at the rate of three-quarters of a million punched cards each year. Our archives of bathythermograms (BT’s) now contain approximately 850,000 analog temperature records for depths up to 900 feet. We are continuing to process approximately 30,000 per year from survey ships or other vessels for which there is an urgent and immediate need. Emphasis has been placed on digitizing BT data and putting in into a form that will make it available for computer programs. Proceeding with a new system, we have digitized approxi- mately 50,000 of the existing archives of 850,000 analog temperature records on a pilot project basis. (Over 2 million data points are contained on approximately 250,000 punched cards.) Since the system has been examined and approved by members of the oceanographic community, we plan to step up production during the coming year, processing into a magnetic tape storage system what will be the equivalent of more than 100,000 observations (half a million punched cards). Because new data are being received at the rate of about 90,000 observations per year, this effort is still far short of what will be required to complete the ulti- mate goal of digitizing the entire backlog as well as keeping up with contem- porary inflow. A variety of other data are received in manuscript or other forms. Standard storage-retrieval systems and determination of standard recording forms have yet to be determined for these data. Nevertheless, these data are organized in a logical manner, usually geographically by data type and date, and are available to the oceanographic community on demand in their existing form. Develop- ment of appropriate storage-retrieval system(s) for these data will proceed as our research and development of systems for data types now in work are com- pleted. In January of this year, we began geological and biological production on a pilot study basis. Core, grab, and dredge data from approximately 2,100 geologi- eal stations have been put into the geological storage-retrieval system for test purposes. Approximately 1,200 biological stations (represented by 5,000 punch ecards) have been entered into the biological storage-retrieval system also for testing purposes. To summarize the chief contributions of the Data Center since its inception, I would emphasize three points: First: Through our efforts there has been increasing emphasis on the use of standardized procedures in recording and reporting. In the past, oceanography has been plagued by a multitude of recording forms and incompatible observing and reporting procedures. The NODC fortuitously has turned out to be the catalyst that has brought the diversified oceanographic interests together to do something concrete about this longstanding problem. The Data Center will con- tinue to sponsor and cooperate in these endeavors. Second: From the beginning, the Data Center has emphasized the application of quality control procedures to the data processing techniques we use, so that 35-377. O—64——_11 146 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 the scientist is assured of receiving the highest quality of data possible under the circumstances. Third : We have emphasized personal service. Services include providing tech- nical information, educational materials, and advice beyond that represented by the simple provision of “hard” data. SERVICES Regarding our service to the oceanographic community, the NODC has been called on many times to furnish statistically summarized and analyzed ocean- ographie data for industrial, private, and Government organizations which need information on the environment in which their instruments will be operated. I would like to give you some idea as to the volume of the reimbursable work performed at the NODC. During fiscal year 1961 our reimbursable funds amounted to about $3,000; during fiscal year 1963, they increased to over $200,000. It must be pointed out, however, that these figures include governmental and non- governmental (industry, private institutions, etc.) requests for services. De- tails on the services supplied are given in the annual report. With your permission, I would like to introduce for the record some of the pub- lications produced by the Data Center since our last report to you. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Now I would like to outline briefly our progress in research and development. We have developed a holding-recall system for indexing core, grab, and dredge samples. Additionally, a system for handling the chemical analyses of sea-bottom materials has been completed and currently is being circulated for approval of the oceanographic community. In work is the development of a system for handling the physical properties of sediments. Significant advances have been made in the development of holding-recall sys- tems for hydrobiological data. Developed (and approved by our Interagency Advisory Board) to date are holding-recall systems to handle environmental data, phytoplankton, primary productivity, phytoplankton pigment data, zoo- plankton data, and benthos data. Progress is being made in the field of physical-chemical data as well. A hold- ing-recall system has just been completed for drift bottle data. The NODC worked very closely with Mr. Dean Bumpus of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution and Dr. John Norcross of the Virginia Institute of Marine Sciences. Also under development are schemes for handling near shore oceanographie data, instrument-measured current data, and nonnutrient chemical data. It should be pointed out that all holding-recall systems are developed in concert with the oceanographic community. Extremely gratifying is the co- operation the NODC has received from the oceanographic community which is reflected in their willingness to serve on the various ad hoc committees formed in conjunction with our developmental work. QUALITY CONTROL OF OCEANOGRAPHIC DATA Now that the NODC has had the experience of nearly 3 years of working with various types of oceanographic data in a multitudinous variety of formats, we can rationally approach the problem of developing and implementing auto- mated (computer) quality controls. I do not mean to imply that until this time there has been no application of quality control, but practically all of it has been applied subjectively. With our present backlog of data and our present and future acquisition effort, we would be naive to believe that we could continue to apply subjective quality controls. To have applied automated quality con- trols at the onset of our operation would also have been naive since no end products had been defined and we had practically no guidelines for total systems. Now we feel we are ready to begin. Shortly, we expect to have in operation a computer program which will check some items of a routine nature which at the present time are monitored by our oceanographers. This will then give additional time for these oceanographers to assess the scientific plausibility of the data. One of the first attempts at automated quality control that we will implement shortly is a program which will check the quality of work done by contractors who are digitizing bathy- thermograms for the NODC. This will not only insure that a major contractor is capable of performing quality work, but will also provide a quality check as the work progresses. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 147 We are making some inroads on the problem of quality control of oceano- graphic station data. We have machine plotted all the temperatiure-salinity relationships (based on historical data) for the Indian Ocean and are currently funding for a similar analysis for the Pacific Ocean. From these plots we are generating envelopes of acceptable limits which for the time being will be used in our subjective quality control program. This is a first step in the generation of mathematical models for the computer which will eliminate the subjective approach. Just about a year ago we were able to demonstrate very dramatically how quality control can pay off through rapid communication systems. During the Equalant I and IJ phases of the international cooperative investigations of the tropical Atlantic (ICITA) in 1963, the NODC received, on a daily basis, mete- orological and oceanographic messages from ships participating in the surveys. During these surveys, we accomplished what we believe to be a first in oceanog- raphy—.e., the radio receipt of a complete oceanographic station within a matter of hours after the station had been occupied. ‘These were then continually re- ceived at the rate of one per day. (Receipt of data at the present time may vary from 1 month to several years after the data are taken.) The basic reduced data were fed to a computer and the computations for density, dynamic depth, specific volume anomaly, and sound velocity were made as were interpolations of these values for internationally accepted standard depths. This in itself dem- onstrated that an oceanographic program for almost instantaneous receipt of data was feasible. As the surveys progressed, the NODC developed an evaluation Message which was communicated back to the ship at sea. During the Equalant II, both an American vessel and an Argentine vessel daily transmitted ocean- ographic data to the NODC. The messages returned to these ships consisted of an evaluation of the observed data against the historical data and served as a means of intership comparison of data. It is interesting to note that the observed data received from both ships showed a bias of very small magnitude in the same direction. ‘The implication of this was that both ships were collecting high quality data. The finale of this experiment in quality control and communications occurred on September 19, 1963, during a combined operation of the Washington Labora- tory of the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries, NASA, and the NODC. On that day, with time available on the Syncom II satellite communication system, the BCF ship, Geronimo, radioed station data to the Kingsport (the Syncom sur- face station) which, in turn, communicated the data to Washington via Syncom II. The data were computed and evaluated by the NODC and salinities were found to deviate significantly from what would be the expected norm for the area. In other words, either a hitherto undiscovered oceanographic phenome- non was occurring in the area or something was wrong with the chemical analy- sis. Shortly after the Geronimo received the evaluation message (which was returned in about an hour), the oceanographers aboard that ship found that their salinometer was malfunctioning. With your permission, I would at this time like to introduce for the record copies of the messages and some of the press reports of this experiment. In December 1963, Dr. Spilhaus presented it in his “Our New Age” syndicated strip which appeared in the Washington Post and other newspapers. Inasmuch as it costs so much to occupy a single oceanographic station, any program which can give a scientist an instantaneous evaluation and quality control of the data he has just taken pays for itself many times over. Once the scientist has left the station, he can never be really sure whether the data he has obtained are worthless or may reveal some new secret of the sea unless he goes back to the same spot and repeats his observations—and this at great extra cost. The NODC is constantly striving to insure the quality of the data both at the collection source and at the shoreside processing facility. NODC PLANS FOR THE FUTURE One of the major objectives of the NODC is the adoption by the oceanographic community at large of standardized coding forms; for this reason, in designing coding forms for use by NODC in data processing, the cooperation of as wide a spectrum as possible of the oceanographic community has been enlisted. NODC will continue to advance this objective; the use of standardized forms will facilitate data processing and thus enhance the early usefulness. of the data to Scientists. 148 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Another objective concerns the development of new and exotic instrumentation, producing new and different types of data output. NODO will continue to work with the Navy’s Instrumentation Center, and the Interagency Instrumentation Panel, and others concerned with the development of new instrumentation to insure that the data products on one hand and data processing and archiving facilities on the other hand are coordinated. NODC will continue to develop its capabilities fer handling physical and marine biological and geological-geophysical data in cooperation with leading scientists in both fields, and with respect to both digital data and nondigital information. NODC will continue to develop quality control procedures designed to enhance the quality of its data products. ‘NODC must discover funding procedures and manpower resources to reduce the accumulated backlog of oceanographic data, the bulk of which was inherited | at the time of its establishment (January 1961). NODC will strive tc improve its communication systems with the leading oceanographic laboratories and organizations in the United States and to expand its exchange programs with foreign organizations. It will continue to work through the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC) and the World Data Center system to improve acquisition and exchange of data. Regular ex- change of data began in 1961 with 18 countries; now our exchange program in- cludes activities in 40 countries. NODC will continue to explore better means of information retrieval, me- chanical, photoelectronic, manual, and combinations thereof, which will speed up the availability of data and information to the user. This concludes my report, Mr. Chairman, and I am now available for any questions you may have. Mr. Peuuy. The next and final witness as I understand it is Dr. Stewart of the Coast and Geodetic Survey. Dr. Stewart, would you come forward? Will you identify yourself for the reporter ? Dr. Stewart. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I am Dr. Harris B. Stewart, Jr., Deputy Assistant Director of the U.S. Coast and Geo- detic Survey in the Office of Oceanography. STATEMENT OF DR. HARRIS B. STEWART, JR., DEPUTY ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, U.S. COAST AND GEODETIC SURVEY IN THE OFFICE OF OCEANOGRAPHY Dr. Stewart. My appearing here today with no prepared statement was occasioned by the fact that I have within the past week returned from the Indian Ocean where I was acting as chief scientist aboard the U.S. Coast and Geodetic ship Pioneer, taking part in the Interna- tional Indian Ocean Expedition, and it was the belief that this com- mittee might be interested in a very brief, on the order of 5 minutes, summary of some of the things that have actually been going on at sea relative to this International Indian Ocean Expedition. The Pioneer left San Francisco on the 11th of February. I jomed the ship in Manila. From Manila we worked down through the South China Sea, touching briefly at Jesselton on Borneo. Then into Singa- pore, up through the Malacca Straits to Penang, on the Malay Pen- ninsula, working back and forth across the Andaman Sea, up through the Bay of Bengal to Calcutta, then down to Columbo, Ceylon, where I left the ship. The ship is now just leaving Djakarta in Indonesia and will work her way across the Pacific arriving at San Francisco in early August. The work done can be briefly summarized. The ship worked from the upper atmosphere where the meteorological balloons finally NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 149 petered out, down through the surface waters where plankton tows and productivity measurements were made as part of the biological program of the International Indian Ocean Expedition, on down through the deeper water where our water sampling profiles were tied in with the international effort to understand the circulation and dis- tribution of variables in the equatorial regions of the Indian Ocean. The work we did in the eastern Indian Ocean tied in with work of other ships from other countries and from the United States farther to the west. The main part of our work, however, was involved in geology and geophysics. This involved sediment coring, rock dredging, bottom photography, diving, work with heat probes or geothermal probes, continuous echo sounding or hydrography. It included special work with a subbottom acoustic device for penetrating the bottom and giv- ing us returns from layers below the bottom. It included the whole gambit, really, of oceanographic activities. I think probably one thing that seldom is heard about in the Indian Ocean operations, one thing which we felt was quite important and one thing I think this committee might be most interested in, was some of the international cooperation and the means we used to try and improve the scientific image of the United States in that part of the world, particularly in southeast Asia. We had aboard from other agencies in the United States people from the Weather Bureau, the Geological Survey, the Naval Oceano- graphic Office, the National Oceanographic Data Center, and a doctor from the Public Health Service. So, you see the things that have been talked about here, this cooperation among the ICO agencies, this also goes on at the wet deck level at sea. We also had personnel from the Scripps Institution of Ocean- ography, from the University of Hawaii, doing work both for the University of Hawaii and for the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries, a man from the University of Southern California, and at each major port we picked up local marine scientists to work with us to the next port. We had a fisheries man from the Philippine Fisheries Com- mission; we had a man from the Philippine Bureau of Coast and Geodetic Survey; we had the director of the Geological Survey of Malaysia; these were people actually aboard taking part im the scien- tific work of the expedition. We had a man from the Fisheries Research Laboratory of Malaysia at Penang. We had one of the directors of the Survey of India aboard. We had a man from Andhra University in India, and just as I left we were getting a man from one of the marine research laboratories of Indonesia. When the Pioneer visited Djakarta in Indonesia this past week, we took up to 50 scientists and other inter- ested people out for 1 day aboard the ship to demonstrate what we were doing. In each port we would hold up to 2 days of scientific seminars. When the ship tied up, instead of having the men scatter about the town as tourists, we would hold scientific seminars with the local scientists; we would hold open house aboard ship in which scientists and imterested people and schoolchildren and government officials could come aboard and would be given a guided tour of the ship. We also had a reception aboard one night for government officials. 150 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 We would hold in each port a press conference in which we would tell the people what we were doing and why we were doing it and how this could perhaps contribute to their well-being. And this whole aspect was made possible primarily through the very close cooperation with and very hard work by the separate offices in each country of the U.S. Information Service which did really a spectacular job so far as we were concerned. But I think this was one aspect of this expedition that in the past ships really have not concentrated on very much—this letting the people in the areas where our ships are working know why we are there and what we are doing and take them along with us to work along with us so that the work we are doing does not just come back to the United States, but, in fact, filters out to the other countries and perhaps helps them in their fisheries problem and their meteorological problem and their basic scientific problems. I have, which I would like to leave with the committee, two copies of the brochure of which we had some 6,000 aboard which were handed out to everyone that came aboard, letting them know something of what the expedition is about. I would also like to leave for possible insertion in the record if I may, Mr. Chairman, copies of six letters that have come back to the Coast and Geodetic Survey, one, for example, from the American Ambassador to Ceylon; one from the Director of the Indian program in the Indian Ocean; one from the U.S. Information Service in Cal- cutta; one from the Ceylon Association for the Advancement of Science; one from the Scripps Institution; and one from a very young girl in the Philippines who visited the ship, a 13-year-old schoolgirl who wrote to say thanks. IT think these things give you some idea of the international aspects of an expedition like this and how it can be used to help burnish up the American scientific image in a part of the world that is currently in a lot of trouble. Also, I would appreciate having included in the record an article that appeared in the December 1963 issue of the Journal of the Ex- plorers Club. In it I tried to summarize briefly what the U.S. oceano- graphic program is all about and why it is of importance to the United States. I feel that this will make a contribution to the testi- mony which the committee is assembling. That is the end of my statement, sir. ae Preity. Fine, Doctor, the material will be made a part of the record. (The letters mentioned follow herewith and the article mentioned may be found in app. 10, p. 683.) THE FOREIGN SERVICE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AMERICAN EMBASSY, Colombo, Ceylon, June 8, 1964. Hon. LUTHER H. HODGEs, Secretary of Commerce, Washington, D.C. DEAR MR. SECRETARY: AS you are aware, the USCGS ship Pioneer, under the command of Capt. E. B. Brown, visited Colombo from May 19 to 25, 1964, during its current voyage as a participating ship in the International Indian Ocean Expe- dition. Weat the Embassy were very favorably impressed by the ship, the ship’s officers, and the scientific staff aboard. In striking contrast to some adverse, unsubstantiated comment of the ship and its mission in the leftist press a few NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 151 weeks before its arrival, we felt that all of the men aboard the Pioneer gave Colombo the most impressive display of scientific interest and knowledge that it had seen for quite some time. In my opinion the visit of the Pioneer made an outstanding contribution to a better understanding in Ceylon of the true purposes of the International Indian Ocean Expedition as well as to a better appreciation of the constructive role that the U.S. Government plays in international organizations in general and in the Indian Ocean Expedition in particular. Dr. Harris B. Stewart, Jr., Deputy Assistant Director, Coast and Geodetic Survey, who was acting as chief scientist aboard the Pioneer when she arrived in Colombo, led a most erudite and informative seminar which was attended by many of Ceylon’s leading scientists in the fields of geology and biology. Undoubt- edly the seminar, along with the reception and open house held aboard the Pioneer, helped much to further amity and understanding between Ceylon and the United States. Capt. EK. B. Brown was most cooperative with the Embassy. He took great care to assure that the advance planning required for the visit was coordinated with the Embassy at every step. Throughout the Pioneer’s stay here he also made a significant contribution to the success of the visit by his splendid overall direction. Sincerely yours, FRANCES E.. WILLIS, American Ambassador. INDIAN OCEAN EXPEDITION, CoUNCIL OF SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH, New Dethi, May 31, 1964. Dr. H. STEWART, Care of Ship Pioneer, U.S. Coast & Geodetic Survey, San Francisco, Calif. DEAR Dr. StuArRT: Although it is likely that we may meet in Paris in connec- tion with the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission meetings, may I write and thank you for your kind letter. It was a very exciting experience to many of our Indian colleagues to be associated with the U.S. group of scientists during the short time your ship spent at Calcutta. We are also extremely happy that the seminar was a suc- cess and that it has kindled many new ideas in our young scientists. I have also personally very much enjoyed the oceanographic company we had during the time we were together in Calcutta. Please accept our most cordial greetings and thanks on behalf of the Indian National Committee on Oceanic Research and myself. With kindest regards. Yours sincerely, N. K. PANIKKAR. U.S. INFoRMATION SERVICE, Calcutta, May 21, 1964. Admiral H. ARNOLD KArRo, Director, U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey, Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C. DEAR ADMIRAL KAro: The recent visit of the USCGS ship Pioneer contributed greatly to the achievement of our mutual objectives you so aptly expressed when you said (the objectives) ‘‘* * * to bring closer that day of universal peace and understanding for which we all strive.” I have heard high praise of the crew and scientists from many of the visitors to the ship. Helpful and cooperative, Capt. Edward Brown was an able am- bassador for the United States and the Coast and Geodetic Survey. Drs. Stewart, Shepherd, and Dietz were a pleasure to work with. Dr. Stewart was especially effective both in his shipboard press conference and in the lecture hall. He has the ability not only to communicate ably with re- porters who lack even the most elementary knowledge of his subject but also to stimulate his scientific peers. I could mention other individuals but because I do not want this letter to become a mere catalog, I will name only Professor Dietz, for the Indian geologists, the outstanding scientist ; clearly he was known 152 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 and respected as a man of stimulating theories, theories that the Indians thronged to hear. This visit more than fulfilled the expectations that arose when we first con- lceeived of the project more than a year ago. We would welcome other such ships. We are submitting a full report to the U.S. Information Agency, Wash- ington, D.C., a copy of which I hope you will see. Sincerely yours, S. B. STEELE, Acting Public Affairs Officer. CEYLON ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE, Colombo, May 22, 1964. Dr. HARRIS B. STEWART, JYF., U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey. DeEAR Dr. STEWART: The Council of the Ceylon Association for the Advance- ment of Science, and the Ceylon Committee for the Indian Ocean Hxpedition wish me to convey to you, Captain Brown, and the other members of the Pioneer their sincere thanks for the most interesting and instructive seminar. The Ceylonese scientists who were present at the Seminar learned a great deal from the lectures delivered at the seminar and were very enthusiastic about the work of the Pioneer. For me personally it was an honor and a privilege to have been associated with you and the staff of the Pioneer. May I be permitted to add that I deeply appreciate the kind references you made and that I shall treasure the lovely medal you were so kind to honor me with. Good luck to the Pioneer and bon voyage. With kindest regards. Sincerely yours, R. O. B. WISESEKERA. May 18, 1964. The DIRECTOR, U.S. Coast & GEODETIC SURVEY, Washington, D.C. Dear ADMIRAL Karo: It has been a great pleasure for me to have accompanied one leg of the Pioneer Indian Ocean Expedition and to have been with the group during the week in Calcutta. I think the Survey will be proud of the results of this expedition. It is not only accomplishing important scientific results but is also adding much to the prestige of the United States by the fine cooperation with USIS in getting across to the nations visited the purposes of the work. The fine series of lectures, seminars, and press conferences, combined with the friendly social gatherings in Calcutta certainly left a splendid impression on the Indian scientists and engineers. Thanks to Dr. Stewart’s carefully made arrangements and advance notices, geologists and geophysicists from all over India came to attend the meetings and to see the ship and equipment. It was just the sort of international exchange that is so badly needed to increase our prestige. What an ideal combination of having Captain Brown in command and Dr. Stewart as chief scientist. They both make such a good team and their spirit is so contagious. I was glad to get to sea because I am afraid that Dr. Stewart would wear him- self out with his constant activities during the visit to Calcutta. He never seemed to have any time to himself at all. Since we sailed he has had a slightly more restful time but stands long night watches following closely all of the activities and contributing in so many ways to the success of the work in the Bay of Bengal. It is a pleasure to see how eagerly every one in the crew cooperates in the work when they have the kind of leadership that exists here. Much has been accomplished in unraveling the mysteries of the interesting valleys and canyons in the Bay of Bengal. It was unfortunate that there was no better means of obtaining positions during the work out beyond shore control. I hope some day when controls are made available that one of the Survey ships can return and really make an accurate map of this interesting bay. Also it will be better when Survey ships are better equipped for coring, dredging, etc. Much valuable time is lost by the difficulty of holding the ship in,position during coring or in proceeding slowly ahead during dredging. I realize that these diffi- culties were unavoidable for the present cruise and that this is just a start in NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 153 equipping the Coast and Geodetic Survey vessels for a more active part in oceanographic research. Let me congratulate you on this fine beginning of what I hope will become a major contribution to international oceanography. Thank you again for the opportunity to participate. With kind regards. Sincerely yours, FRANCES P. SHEPARD, Professor of Submarine Geology, Scripps Institution of Oceanography. MANILA, PHILIPPINE ISLANDS, March 15, 1964. To Captain Brown, Dr. Stewart, Officers and Crewmembers of the Pioneer, Espe- cially “Sir Sweat.” Deak Sirs: In behalf of my friends, I sincerely wish to thank you for your kindness in allowing us to tour your ship. If you only knew how much we enjoyed and profited from this. We honestly believe that you are the kindest and most patient foreigners we’ve ever met. I know that we were a bunch of giggling, immature adolescents causing so much trouble for poor Mr. Sweat. We do apologize and hope that the next time you come, you would see us a bit more grown up. There were many of us who went there quite ignorant. We had heard of ocean- ography and we mistakenly thought of it as inferior to solar physics, bio-, ete. I mean what is so important about the old sea? We thought that it was a dull, unadventurous job—sort of like taking a white collar job. But we know now that it is not. I know that Dr. Stewart would be very glad to hear this—I over- heard one of the boys telling another that you have convinced him about ocean- ography and that he might study that for college. We may not all turn out oceanographers but you have planted in us that desire to search, to be curious and the desire to learn. So despite all the trouble we’ve caused you, I hope that this might make you feel good. Again I wholeheartedly thank you. We shall all miss you—may God bless you all. Sincerely yours, THERESA YANG. Mr. Prtiy. I think your appearance here this morning has really brought out this whole matter of oceanography up to date. You have practically come right out of the field and made this very interesting explanation. I certainly hope that other members of the committee will read what you had to say because I think it gives a definite feel of the whole program. As I recall at the time when this project was first started there was some doubt on the part of some foreign countries as to whether they wanted our cooperation and intrusion into those waters and I think from what you say that you are certainly making this whole program understood and I for one can say I have enjoyed your little brief sum- mary here very much and I thank you for it. Mr. Bauer or our counsel may wish to ask some questions, so do not go away. Mr. Bauer. I have no questions. _ Mr. Petry. It would seem, then, that you would bring to a very interesting conclusion the hearing here this morning. We appreciate your presence and the presence of other witnesses. The record will remain open for a reasonable length of time for any additions or statements that others may wish to include. _ I wish to thank all the witnesses for their appearances. The meet- Ing is adjourned. (Whereupon, at 11 :30 p.m., the hearing was adjourned. ) aie mh : i Pi i 4pe qe i, Dit : . the " feet i x x Rien tid party . ; pore han on eae Se YEOL ie 2 Re ively ‘aged a ei! ae APPENDIX 1 MATERIAL SUBMITTED BY DR. J. HERBERT HOLLOMON, CHAIRMAN OF THE INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMITTEE FOR ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES OF THE FEDERAL COUNCIL FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY RELATIVE TO AIR-SEA INTERACTION RESEARCH PLANNING 155. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 157 FEDERAL COUNCIL FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMITTEE FOR ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON, D.C. 20230 July 8, 1964 Honorable Herbert C. Bonner Chairman, Merchant Marine and Fisheries Committee U.S. House of Representatives Washington, D.C. Dear Mr. Bonner: In view of my responsibilities as chairman of the Inter- departmental Committee for Atmospheric Sciences of the Federal Council for Science and Technology and the unique responsibility that has been assigned to the Department of Commerce relative to air-sea interaction research planning, I am providing you with a summary of the developments leading to this assignment together with the pertinent background documents. You will note that the emphasis of the Department of Commerce assignment lies in the areas of coordination, and in identi- fying and filling in the cracks in an overall Federally- Supported program which is to be developed in full agreement with all participating agencies and on the basis of earlier recommendations of the National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council. This program assignment to the Department of Commerce specifically provides for individual agencies conducting their own research consistent with their statutory missions, If I can be of any further assistance in this matter, please don’t hesitate to let me know. Sincerely yours, TYomon Attachments 158 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 FEDERAL COUNCIL FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMITTEE FOR ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON, D.C. 20230 AIR-SEA_ INTERACTION PLANNING In the spring of 1960 the National Academy Committees on Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences jointly appointed a panel to study the area of mutual concern -- research on the inter- actions between the air and the sea. The joint panel under Dr. George S. Benton of John Hopkins University, produced NAS-NRC Publication 983, “Interaction Between the Atmosphere and the Oceans", in January 1962. This report made six recommendations: 1) Techniques must be developed for various measurements in the boundary layer of the atmosphere and the ocean. 2) Investigation of the physics and chemistry of the interfacial zone and the effect of its properties on exchange mechanisms must be pursued. 3) Special area studies should be undertaken to provide experimental facilities for field tests of equipment. 4) Systems of fixed stations instrumented for atmospheric and oceanographic observations must be established. 5) Marine meteorological observations from ships should be improved in quality and extended in scope. 6) Automatic recording, processing, reduction and storage of data should be employed wherever appropriate. The Interagency Committee on Oceanography (ICO) and the Inter- departmental Committee for Atmospheric Sciences (ICAS) reviewed this report and endorsed the identification of and emphasis on the problems of research, In a joint letter to Dr. Wiesner of 24 September 1962, it was recommended that the Academy draft a specific program of implementation to be included in the Academy's <“report on oceanography and atmospheric sciences to be further considered by ICO and ICAS for inclusion within their total national programs. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 159 At the same time, ICO and ICAS, appreciating the importance of this research area, commenced discussions which led to the formation in December 1962, of a Joint Ad Hoc Panel on Air-Sea Interaction. This panel was given an initial task of developing a program, the initial phases of which could be implemented in FY 1965. A draft report was completed by March 1963, which delineated research needs in the micro-meso- and macroscale areas, estimated instrumentation and system requirements, and recommended the establishment of a National Air-Sea Research Institute to coordinate, guide, and conduct air-sea research programs. The report called for $18.8 million in FY 1965 and $14.3 million in FY 1966. It was considered by ICO and ICAS in April 1963 as incomplete and in need of further identification of programs and deficiencies as well as priorities. Further effort by the panel produced a report in October recommending a National Program consisting of highest priority and most significant items and calling for a FY 1965 budget of $4.4 million. This report emphasized the need for an effective interagency coordination mechanism including a small, full-time staff competent in both meteorology and oceanography, and administratively assigned to one federal agency. Its budget was largely for instrumentation and data processing, but included also some micro- and mesoscale research support. This report was accompanied by a recommendation from the chairman, ' Dr. Jacobs, that in view of the operational and research experience of the Dept. gf Commerce (Weather Bureau and Coast & Geodetic Survey) in both meteorology and oceanography, that Department should take immediate action t establish a full-time staff to proceed with the planning and implementation of an effective air-sea research program, It also set forth certain steps needed to be taken to enable meteorology and oceanography to proceed together toward common goals; i.e. integration of observational procedures and networks, development and procurement of common instrumentation, creation of a compatible data analysis and dissemination system, and coordination of area studies of air/sea transfer processes. The program as recommended was only partially endorsed by ICO and ICAS, but the need for a coordination mechanism was recognized and a joint ICO-ICAS letter was forwarded to Dr. Weisner in December 1963 recommending that Commerce be assigned the responsi- bility "to coordinate the further identification of the unique problems involved" and ‘should develop a coordinated air-sea interaction program with other interested agencies...". The joint panel was to be made permanent to monitor the program for ICO and ICAS. 160 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Dr. Wiesner approved this concept and assigned to the Department of Commerce the primary responsibility for leadership in the important field of air-sea interaction. When implementation plans of the Department of Commerce were presented to ICAS and ICO, some differences of policy developed as to whether responsibility for development of the overall air-sea program should lie with the Department of Commerce or with the ICO-ICAS joint panel acting for ICO and ICAS. Two alternative plans were presented to the Federal’ Council by the' ICAS Chairman, Dr. Hollomon, in February 1964, as a result of which Dr. Hornig amplified Dr. Wiesner's instructions and assigned to the:Department of Commerce the responsibility for developing a Federally-supported air/sea interation program in consultation with the participating agencies through their representatives on a joint ICO/ICAS air-sea interaction panel. Agencies continue to be responsible for funding, conducting, and otherwise managing their portions of the program consistent ‘with their statutory missions. Such portions are those either initially proposed by an agency for support, or added by mutual agreement between between the agency, Department of Commerce, and the joint panel. The Department of Commerce will undertake funding needed to fill out the remaining important components of the total program plan consistent with its statutory missions. Area studies of transfer processes represent: one such component. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 161 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC DATA CENTER WASHINGTON 25, D.C. Code 2000-WCJ/cal 18 October 1963 To: Dr. Je Herbert Hollomon Chairman, Interdepartmental Committee on Atmospheric Sciences U. S. Department of Commerce Washington, De. Ce 20230 Dr. James H. Wakelin, Jr. Chairman, Interagency Committee on Oceanography U. S. Department of the Navy Y Washington, De C. 20350 Dear Dr. Hollomon and Dr. Wakelin: I am writing to you on a matter of considerable urgency which I hope can soon be resolved in the national interest. The importance of the investigation of air-sea processes has been repeatedly emphasized by atmospheric scientists and oceanographers who have been conducting research in these interdependent fields. Atmospheric scientists and oceanographers are agreed that an aug- mented and coordinated program for investigating the processes of air-sea interaction should be one of the major objectives in the field of geophysics during the next decade. If oceanography and meteorology are to progress significantly beyond their present states of development, it is essential that further knowledge be gained of the exchange of energy, momentum, and material sub~ stances across the air-sea interface. The 1962 report of the National Academy's Joint Panel on Air-Sea Interaction (NAS-NRC Publication 983) emphasized the need for further investigation into the processes of the air-sea interactions In response to this need, a joint ICO/ICAS Ad Hoc Panel on Ocean- Atmosphere Research was established under my chairmanship: (1) to study the problem, (2) to recommend an Ocean-Atmosphere Research Program, and (3) to prepare a budget for this program for FY-1965 and the years immediately following. The Panel submitted a first draft of its report in March 1963, and presentations on the sub- stance of the report have been made to the ICO, ICAS, and the 35-377 O—64——_12 162 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Federal Council for Science and Technology, the Joint NASCAS/NASCO Panel on Air-Sea Interactions, and the OST Ad Hoc Advisory Committee on Oceanography. All of these groups have agreed on the requirement to implement an aggressive Ocean-Atmosphere Research Program along the lines proposed by the Joint ICO/ICAS Panel. ‘The Ad Hoc Advisory Committee on Oceanography further stated, "We believe it is essential that a start on such a program be made in FY-1965." The major obstacle in the way of implementing the Ocean-Atmosphere Research Program is the complexity of the federal structure which controls the activities required to support such a program. At the present time, the meteorological and oceanographic activities re- quired to support an effective air-sea research effort are spread through some twenty-one federal agencies. And, since the program involves a team effort between the atmospheric scientist and ‘oceanographer, an additional problem is the coordination of two observational and research mechanisms which have until now been only incidentally related to each other. If we are to develop an adequate national and international program of ocean-atmosphere research, we must take bold and difficult steps in the fields of meteorology, oceanography, and possibly hydrology to: 1. Integrate observational procedures and networks} 2-e Develop and procure common instrumentations 3- Create a compatible data analysis and dissemination system; and 4, Plan for and implement coordinated area studies based on all available methods of measuring vertical transfer. However, unless an effective centralized coordinating mechanism is established, it is feared that the air-sea research effort will be consigned to failure. In view of the operational and research experience of the Department of Commerce (Weather Bureau and Coast and Geodetic Survey) in both oceanography and meteorology, it is proposed that the Department of Commerce take immediate action to establish a full-time staff within the Department to proceed with the planning, and mimes by FY-1965, of an effective air-sea research programe Sincerely yours, bis iC hep We Cdé/ JACOBS Chairman Joint ICO/ICAS Ad Hoc Panel on Ocean-Atmosphere Research NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 163 FEDERAL COUNCIL FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY EXECUTIVE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON 25, D.c. December 4, 1963 MEMORANDUM FOR Dr. Jerome B. Wiesner SUBJECT: Air/Sea Interaction Research The only identifiable air/sea interaction programs within the Federal Government have been set forth in the FY 1963 and 1964 National Oceanographieé Programs and have been essentially a description of departmental or agency oceanographit programs that could be identified as contributing to the air/sea interaction research objective. There has not been developed an integrated air/sea interaction research program with specific objectives toward which progress could be evaluated. The efforts of the Joint Ad Hoc ICO/ICAS Air/Sea Interaction Research Panel to develop just such a program have continued since its working draft report distributed to the Council at its meeting of April 23, 1963. Another report is now at hand recommending a minimum essential program for FY 1965. This report has been accepted by ICAS and is under consideration by ICO and ICAS. : Essential steps which must be accomplished in the fields of meteorology, oceanography, and possibly hydrology are: 1, Integration of observational procedures and networks, 2. Development and procurement of common instrumentation. 3. Creation of a compatible data analysis and dissemination system. 4. Coordination of area studies of air/sea transfer processes. le In order to make progress along these lines and to insure the development of an adequate National Air/Sea Interaction Research Program, a single agency should be assigned the responsibility now to coordinate the further identification of the unique problems involved and to stimulate the necessary agency activities in this field. In view of its special interest and research experience in both meteorology and oceanography {Weather Bureau and Coast and Geodetic Survey), the Department of Commerce should bs 164 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 assisned this re sponsibility and should develop a coordinated air/sea interaction vrocram with other interested agencies which when considered WOES Se S| pes ee ES EEE ESSE ees with the missiton-orlented prosrams of all other agencies concerned will A AAD round out a comprehensive national program. It is planned to make permanent the Joint ICO/ICAS Air/Sea Interaction Research Panel to monitor and insure that the Air/Sea Interaction Research Program will be implemented by the various responsible Government agencies. James H. Wakelin, Jr. J. Herbert Hollomon Chairman, Interagency Committee Chairman, Interdepartmental on Oceanography Committee for Atmospheric Sciences NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 165 » ¢ EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT rey Office of Science and Technology Pp Washington, D.C. 20506 Y December 5, 1963 , -MEMORANDUM FOR Dr. James H. Wakelin, Jr. ‘Dr. J. Herbert Hollomon Chairman, Interagency Com- ° Chairman, Interdepartmental Committee for Atmospheric mittee on Oceanography ; Sciences FROM: Jerome B. Wiesner I am glad to have your memorandum dated December 4, 1963 on Air/Sea Interaction Research, The expressed inten- tion of ICO and ICAS to develop a coherent research program in this important area is most encouraging; and the Air/Sea Interaction Panel, the two Federal Council committees and their chairmen are to be commended. I hope that it will be possible to find strong scientific leadership for this new program and that it will be possible to begin promptly the planning for the coordinated program, The atmosphere and ocean are coupled mechanical and thermodynamic systems, and the air/sea interaction program should contribute toward a deeper appreciation of this elementary fact and toward more effective cooperation in other parts of the meteorology and oceanography programs. Jerome B, Wiesner 166 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 : COPY FEDERAL COUNCIL FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Executive Office Building Washington, D.C. 19 December 1963 MEMORANDUM FOR: Dr. J. Herbert Hollomon Assistant Secretary of Commerce SUBJECT: Central Responsibility for Air-Sea Interaction Program Following the recommendations of the ICO and ICAS, as stated in the memorandum to me of December 4 from you and Dr. Wakelin, I am glad to assign to the Department of Commerce the primary responsibility for leadership in the important field of air-sea interaction. The Department should coordinate those activities of the various agencies in this field which contribute to a coherent national program, it . Should stimulate interest and understanding of the parts of the program which need strengthening, and it should carry out the administrative management of area studies of air- sea transfer in which universities, research institutions, and Government agencies may participate. Jerome B. Wiesner ce: Dr. James H. Wakelin, Jr., Chairman, ICO NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 167 EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY WASHINGTON 6 March 1964 MEMORANDUM FOR: J. Herbert Hollomon, Chairman, ICAS James H, Wakelin, Chairman, ICO SUBJECT: Air-Sea Interaction Program At its meeting ‘on-February 25, 1964, the Federal Council discussed questions related to the responsibility of the Department of Commerce for the air-sea interaction program. The Council supported the designation of special responsibility in this area to DOC as an experiment to be reviewed _ at the end of one year. The Council further agreed to the following specific statement of this responsibility as it appears in the minutes: "Planning Responsibilities for Interagency Air/Sea Interaction Research Ie. he Department of Commerce is responsible for coordinated planning of the Federally-supported air/sea interaction program, 2 This program will be developed in consultation with the “ participating agencies through their representatives on a joint ICO/ICAS air/sea interaction panel. 3. The program developed by DOC will be submitted jointly to ICO/ICAS for review. 4, These air/sea interaction plans will be submitted to the Federal Council for Science and Technology for endorsement as components of National Programs in Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences. 5. Agencies are responsible for funding, conducting, and otherwise managing their portions of the program, consistent 168 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 with their statutory missions. Such portions are those either initially proposed by an agency for support, or added by mutual agreement between the agency, DOC, and the joint panel. 6. DOC will undertake funding needed to fill out the remaining important components of the total program plan consistent with its statutory missions. Area studies of transfer processes represent one such component, "' i The intention of the Council is to stimulate activity and provide effective leadership and coordination of the air/sea interaction program, I am glad to endorse the Council's statement, which should serve to. amplify Dr. Wiesner's earlier memoranda on the subject and should clarify the relationship of DOC to the other agencies in this area, |. a Donald F. Hornig NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 169 FEDERAL COUNCIL FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMITTEE FOR ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON, D.C. 20230 June 19, 1964 C Dr. Franklin A. Gifford Chairman, Joint ICO/ICAS Air-Sea Interaction Panel U.S. Weather Bureau Washington, D.C. Dear Dr. Gifford: At their April meetings the Interagency Committee for Oceanography and the Interdepartmental Committee for Atmospheric Sciences approved the fallowing membership for a Joint ICO/ICAS Air-Sea Interaction Panel: Dr. Franklin A. Gifford, USWB, Chairman Dr. Donald P. Martineau, Office of Naval Research Mr. Thomas Austin, Bureau of Commercial Fisheries LCDR Richard M. Morse, U.S. Coast Guard Dr. Fred White, National Science Foundation Dr. W. C. Jacobs, National Oceanographic Data Center Dr. R. V. Thomann, Department of Health, Education and Welfare An additional member, Mr. Arnold B. Joseph, Division of Biology and Medicine of the Atomic Energy Commission, has now been approved. Your panel is charged with providing assistance to the Department of Commerce in the development of the Federally-supported air-sea interaction program. You will keep the program under continuous review and recommend to the ICO and the ICAS the appropriate components of the National Programs in Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences. James H. Wakelin, Jr. J. Herbert Hollomon Chairman, Interagency Chairman, Interdepartmental Committee on Oceanography Committee for Atmospheric Sciences 170 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 FEDERAL COUNCIL FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMITTEE FOR ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON, D.C. 20230 C June 19, 1964 C Dr. We. CGC. Jacobs Chairman, Joint ICO/ICAS Ad Hoc Panel on Air=-Sea Interaction National Oceanographic Data Center Washington, D, C. Dear Doctor Jacobs: The Joint ICO/ICAS Ad Hoc Panel on Air-Sea Interaction, of which you are Chairman, is hereby dissolved as a formal agency of the Interagency Committee for Oceanography and the Interdepartmental Committee for Atmospheric Sciences, You and your panel are to be commended for the tremendous undertaking represented by your "Working Draft National Program, Ocean=Atmospheric Research" of March 1963, and your "National Program, Ocean-Atmospheric Research, Fiscal Year 1965" of October 4, 1963. Both documents have accom- plished much toward identifying the unique problems in the air-sea interaction area and providing the basis for further agency programing. It is hoped that the members of your panel will be available as individuals to assist the new Joint ICO/ICAS Air-Sea Interaction Panel and the Sea—Air Interaction Laboratory of the Department of Commerce in the development of the Federally-supported program. James H. Wakelin, Jr. J. Herbert Hollomon Chairman, Interagency Chairman, Interdepartmental Committee on Oceanography Committee for Atmospheric Sciences APPENDIX 2 BIBLIOGRAPHY OF OCEANOGRAPHIC PUBLICATIONS SUB- MITTED BY HON. JAMES H. WAKELIN, JR., ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THH NAVY ial a ne md nt WA Sm ~ free ost pe a I ji ees Le tea che : BIBLIOGRAPHY OF _ OCEANOGRAPHIC _ PUBLICATIONS INTERAGENCY COMMITTEE ON OCEANOGRAPHY of the FEDERAL COUNCIL FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY United States of America 1CO Pamphlet No. 9 April 1963 173 174 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 FEDERAL COUNCIL FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY JEROME B. WIESNER, Chairman Director OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY HAROLD BROWN GLENN T. SEABORG Director of Defense Research and Engineering DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Chairman ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION ALAN T. WATERMAN Je HERBERT HOLLOMON Director Assistant Secretary for Science and Technology NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE JAMES E. WEBB Administrator BOISFEUILLET JONES NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION Special Assistant to the Secretary for Health and Medical Affairs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE WILLARD COCHRANE Director, Agricultural Economics DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ROGER REVELLE Science Adviser to the Secretary DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ELMER B. STAATS Deputy Director BUREAU OF THE BUDGET (Observer) RAGNAR ROLLEFSON N. E. HALABY Director, Office of Intemational Scientific Affairs (Observer) DEPARTMENT OF STATE Administrator FEDERAL AVIATION AGENCY (Observer) EDWARD WENK, JR. Technical Assistant to the Director OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (Executive Secretary) INTERAGENCY COMMITTEE ON OCEANOGRAPHY JAMES H. WAKELIN, JR., Chairman Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Research and Development) RADM. H. ARNOLD KARO HARVE J. CARLSON U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE DONALD L. McKERNAN HARRY G. HANSON Bureau of Commercial Fisheries Public Health Service DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE RADM. R. D. SCHMIDTMAN U. S. Coast Guard JOHN N. WOLFE ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY RAGNAR ROLLEFSON I. E. WALLEN Office of International Scientific Affairs Museum of Natural History DEPARTMENT OF STATE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ROBERT B. ABEL Office of Naval Research DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY (Secretary) NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 175 FOREWORD The Interagency Committee on Oceanography of the Federal Council for Science and Technology plans and coordinates programs in the science of oceanography sponsored by government agencies. As part of its area of activity, the Committee is interested in assuring that the supply of scien- tists and engineers is sufficient to accomplish the programs planned for future years. The Committee has published this selected bibliography to provide a source of readly available information about marine science to students and other potential scientists. The Committee is grateful to Mark W. Pangborn, Jr. of the U. S. Geological Survey and those who assisted him in the compilation of this bibliography. 176 Section ae 26 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 TABLE OF CONTENTS General Oceanography Physical Oceanography: Sea Water, Waves, Tides, and Currents Pollution of the Ocean Sediments and Stratigraphy Geology of the Sea Bottom and Coasts The Mohole Islands and Coral Reefs Legal Aspects of the Sea Navigation History of Navigation Chart Making and History of Chart Making General Oceanographic Procedure, Techniques, Instrumentation, and Equipment Survival at Sea; Safety, Health Diving A. General B. Bathysphere and Bathyscaph Diving C. Helmet and Hose Diving D Skin and Scuba Diving Submarine Archaeology and Treasure Diving Underwater Photography Marine Meteorology Resources of the Sea (excluding fisheries) Marine Biology and Ecology Seaweed Fishes Fisheries and Fishery Research Sea and Shore Birds Whales and other Sea Mammals Seashore Life Shells; Mollusks Education and Careers in Oceanography Dictionaries Directories History of Oceanography Biographies of Oceanographers Oceanographic Expeditions General Maps of the Oceans Films and Film Strips Bibliographies on Oceanography and Related Subjects Periodicals on Oceanography and Related Subjects atal Page DOLE MH O Oro \0 \O @O~ Be as NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 177 INTRODUCTION This reading list of 500 selected titles has been prepared to help the student and general reader locate information about the ocean in its many aspects. It lists technical treatises, college textbooks, dictionaries, directories, bibliographies, periodicals, maps, films, histories, biographies, and non-technical books and articles under 36 subject headings, with reading level and contents indicated. Only titles in English are listed. Older books are generally omitted unless they are of exceptional interest. Further information on physical oceanography, including tides, waves, currents, and charts of our coastal waters, may be obtained from: Director U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey, Washington 25, D. C. Further information on the geology of the coasts and sea bottom, may be obtained from: Director, U. S. Geological Survey, Washington 25, D. C. Further information on the plants and animals that live in the oceans and along the shore, may be obtained from: Commissioner, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington 25, D. C. Single copies of this bibliography are available from: Interagency Committee on Oceanography, Building T-3, Room 1714, 17th and Constitution Avenue, Washington 25, D. C. iii 35-377. O0—64——_13, 178 1. GENERAL OCEANOGRAPHY A. Technical Oceanography; an introduction to the marine sciences, Jerome Williams. Boston, Little, Brown, 1962. 22 p. $8.00. college textbook. The Oceams; their physics, chemistry, and general biology, Harold Ulrik Sverdrup and ethers. Wew York, Prentic-Hall, 1962. 1087 p. $20.00. technical treatise. Oceanography; invited lectures presented at the International Oceanographic Congress, edited by Mary Sears. Washington, 1961. 645 p. (American Association for the Advance- ment of Science. Publication no. 67). $14.75. Thirty articles by experts on a wide range of oceanographic problems. Proceedings of the Symposium on Aspects of Deep Sea Research. . . edited by William Stelling von Arx. Washington, 1957. 1681p. (National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council. Publication no.l\73). $1.75 Ocean Geography for Oceanographers, Cuchlaine A. M. King. New York, St. Martin's Press, 1963. 336 p. In press. Gulf of Mexico; its origin, waters, and marine life, edited by Paul Simon Galtsoff. Washington, G.P.0., 1954. 604 p. (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Fishery bulletin 89). $3.25 from Government Printing Office. B. For the Adult pee and High School Student (ages up). This Great and Wide Sea; an introduction to oceanography and marine biology, Robert Ervin Coker. New York, Harper, 1962. 325 p. $2.25. Reprint of a very easy college text, 197. The Sea, Leonard Engel. New York, Time, Inc., 1961. 190 p. (LIFE nature library). $3.25. This beautiful book features many colored pictures and fine maps, and will be enjoyed by both adults and children. The Sea Around Us, Rachel Louise Carson. Rev.ed. New York, Oxford University Press, 1961. 237 p. $5.00. A famous best-seller dealing mostly with physical and geological oceanography. The Sea and its Mysteries, John S. Colman. New York, Norton, 1950. 285 p. $3.75. Concise summary. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Coaste, Waves and Weather, for Navigators. Jehn Quincy Stewart. Boston, Ginn, 195. The Arctic Ocean, P. A. Gordienko. (Scien- tific American, vol.20h, no.5, May 1961, pp.88-102). An account of Russian investigations. The Antarctic Ocean, V. G. Kort. (Seientific American, vol.207, no.3, Sept. 1962, pp.113- 28). Resulte of Russian research. Frontiers of the Sea; the story of oceano- graphic exploration, Robert C. Cowen. Garden City, New York, Doubleday, 1960. 307 p. $4.95. Fine; this and the next seven titles emphasize the research now going on. Turn to the Sea, Athelstan Frederick Spilhaus. Washington, National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council, 1959. ly p. Pamphlet on the importance of study- ing the oceans. Conquest of the Sea, Cord-Christian Troebst. New York, Harper, 1962. 269 p. $4.95. An account of the sea as a possible seat of military action, and as a source of minerals, power, and food, and of the research needed to understand the sea. Ocean Science and National Security; report of the Committee on Science and Astronautics, U. S. House of Representatives, 86th Congress, 2d Session. Washington, G.P.0. 1960. 180 p. (Report no. 2078, serial H). Oceanography, 1960 to 1970. Washington, National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council, Committee on Oceanography, 1959-1962. 12 parts. Free. Describes the personnel, ships, equipment, and research needs of oceanography over the next ten years. National Oceanographic Program, Fiscal Year 1963. Washington, 1962. 31p. (U.S. Interagency Committee on Oceanography. ICO pamphlet no. 3). Free. Exploring the Secrets of the Sea, William J. Cromie. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall 1962. 300 p. $5.95. Fine; on the present state of our knowledge of the ocean and how that knowledge has been gained. The Global Sea, Harris Bates Stewart, Jr. Princeton, New Jersey, Van Nostrand, 1963. 128 p. In preparation. A summary of recent advances in oceanography and why a knowledge of the ocean is important to our life on land. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 179 ‘ne Woods Hole Marine Biological Laboratory, Frank Rattray Lillie. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 19). 28) p. On the history and activities of a famous research organization. C. For Children Ages 10 to 1h. Secrets of the Sea; oceanography for young scientists, Howard Jonah Pincus. Columbus 16, Ohio, American Education Publications, Education Center, 1960. 31 p. $0.15. Information-packed pamphlet; includes career data. The Sea for Sam, William Maxwell Reed and Wilfrid S. Bronson. Rev. by Paul F. Brandwein. New York, Harcourt, 1960. 23 p. $4.95. The Sea Around Us, Rachel Louise Carson. Special edition for young readers, adapted by Anne Terry White. New York, Golden Press, 1958. 165 p. $.95. Finely illustrated. 1001 Questions Answered About the Oceans, Jan Hahn. New York. Dodd, Mead, 1963. $6.00. In press. The Golden Picutre Book of Sea and Shore; tide pools, Shells, small animals, the big and little creatures of the ocean; tides, currents, islands, and other wonders of the sea, Marion Bergner Carr. New York, Golden Press, 1959. 57 p. $0.79. Easy book, features pictures. The Wonderful World of the Sea, James Fisher. Garden City, New York, Garden City Books, 1957. 68 p. $3.45. Attractive picture book, stressing man's relations to the sea. All About the Sea, Ferdinand C. Lane. New York. Random House, 1953. 148 p. $1.95. Easy. The Young Pathfinder's Book of Oceans, Streams, and Glaciers, William D. Clarke. New York, Hart Publ.Co., 1961. 128 p. $3.95. This volume deals almost entirely with oceanography. Turn to the Sea, Athelstan Frederick Spilhaus. Adapted for young readers by Eileen Daly. Racine, Wisconsin, Whitman Publ.Co., 1962. 59 p. $0.59. This and the next five titles deal with the need for oceanographic research, and describe the techniques and gadgetry used in such research. All about Underseas Exploration, Ruth Brindze New York, Random, 1960. 15 p. $1.95. Underseas; the challenger of the deep frontier, Cora Cheney and Ben Partridge. New York, Coward-McCann, 1961. 125 p. $2.95. The Challenge of the Sea, Arthur Charles Clarke. New York, Holt, 1960. 167 p. $3.95. In the Deep Blue Sea, Elizabeth Morgan. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall, 1962. 72 p. $2.95. Easy. The Wonders of Underwater Exploration, Irwin Stambler. New York, Putnam, 1962. 128 p. $1.95. PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY: SEA WATER, WAVES, TIDES, AND CURRENTS. An Introcuction to Physical Oceanography, William Stelling von Arx. Reading, Mass. Addison-Wesley, 1962. 22 p. $15.00. Pages 19 to 4 deal with the geological background, the remainder with sea water and its movement. college textbook. Physical Oceanography, Albert Defant. New York, Pergamon Press, 1961. 2 vols. $35.00. Very technical treatise. Dynamical Oceanography, Joseph Proudman. New York, Wiley, 1953. 09 p. $8.50. Technical. The Sea; ideas and observations. Vol.1, Physical Oceanography, M. N. Hill and others. New York, Wiley, 1962. 664 p. $25.00. Technical; summarizes what we have learned since about 190. Proceedings of the UNESCO Symposium on Physical Oceanography. Tokyo, 1955. Tokyo, UNESCO and Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, 1957. 292 p. $4.50. Technical: forty-six articles on instrumentation, currents, work in progress. Conference on Physical and Chemical Properties of Sea Water, Easton, Maryland. . . Washington, 1959. 202 p. (National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council. Publ. no. 600). $2.00. Technical. Chemistry and Fertility of Sea-Water, Hildebrand Wolfe Harvey. New York, Cambridge University Press, 1955. 2h p. $5.50. Replaces his "Recent Advances in the Chemistry and Biology of Sea-Water." Technical. Realms of Water; some aspects of its cycle in nature, Philip Henry Kuenen. New York, Wiley, 1955. 327 p. $6.50. Pages 21-88 cover water in the sea; a little technical. 180 Water, Miracle of Nature, Thomson King. New York, Collier Books, 1961. 238 p.- $0.95. Pages 30-62 discuss water in the sea. The Anatomy of the Atlantic, Henry Stommel. (Scientific American, vol.192, no.1, Jan. 1955, pp.30-35). Currents, temperature, saltiness. Hydrodynamics of Oceans and Atmospheres, Carl Henry Eckart. New York, Pergamon Press, 1960. 290 p. $9.00. Technical. The Atmosphere and Sea in Motion; scientific contributions to the Rossby memorial volume, Bert Bolin. New York, Rockefeller Institute Press, 1959. 509.p. $15.00. Technical. Interaction Between the Atmosphere and the Oceans; report to the Committee on Atmos- pheric Sciences and the Committee on Oceano- graphy, the Joint Panel on Air-Sea Interaction. Washington, 1962. 3 p. (National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council. Publ. 983). O.P. Technical. Interaction of Sea and Atmosphere; a group of contributions, by Alfred Clarence Redfield and others. Boston, 1957. 75 p. American Meteorological Society. (Meteorological Monographs, vol.2, no.10). Waves and Tides, Robert Christopher ,Hamlyn Russell and D. H. Macmillan. London, Hutchinson's Scientific and Technical Publications, 1952. 38 p. A little technical in spots. Water Waves; the mathematical theory with application, James Johnston Stoker. New York, Interscience, 1957. 567 p. $12.00. Technical. Wind Waves at Sea, Breakers and Surf, Henry Bryant Bigelow and W. T. Edmondson. Washing- ton, G.P.0., 1947. 177 p. (U. S. Hydro- graphic Office. Publ. no.602). $2.80. from Hydrographic Office, Washington, D. C. Ocean Waves and Kindred Geophysical Phenom- ena, Vaughan Cornish. Cambridge, England, University Press, 193). 163 p. pp.1-h9 deal with ocean waves; pp.86-120, with tidal bores. Ocean Waves, Willard Bascom. (Scientific American, vol.201, no.2, August 1959, pp. 74-8). Tides and Tidal Streams; a manual compiled for the use of seamen, Harold Dreyer Warburg. New York, Cambridge University Press, 1922. 95 p. $3.75. Somewhat technical. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Tidal Hydraulics, George Bigelow Pillsbury. Washington, G.P.0., 1940. 283 p. (U. S. Corps of Engineers. Professional paper no. 3h). Technical. The Tide, Harry Aaron Marmer. New York, Appleton, 1926. 282 p. Semitechnical. The Tides, and Kindred Phenomena in the Solar System, George Howard Darwin. San Francisco, Freeman, 1962. 378 p. $2.75. Reprint of an 1897 series of lectures; not very technical. Ebb and Flow; the tides of earth, air, and water, Albert Defant. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, 1960. 121 p. $1.25. Deals mainly with ocean tides; very fine. The Tides, Thomas D. Nicholson. (Natural History, vol.68, 1959, pp.326-33). The Margins of the Restless Ocean, Hubert A. Bauer. (Natural History, vol.68, 1959. pp.470-76). Effect of the tides on the land. The Giant Tides of Fundy, Paul A. Zahl. (National Geographic Magazine, vol.112, no.2, Aug. 1957, pp.153-92). Easy, many pictures. Watch the Tides, David Greenhood. New York, Holiday, 1961. $2.75. Fine for younger children. Tsunamis, Joseph Bernstein. (Scientific American, vol.191, no.2, August 195), pp.60- 64). About so-called "tidal waves." Coastal Currents Along the Atlantic Coast of the United States, Frank Joshua Haight. Washington, G.P.0., 1942. 73 p. (U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey. Special publ. no.230). O.p. The Coast Survey has issued many pamphlets on currents, temperature, and salinity of our coasts, bays, and harbors. The Gulf Stream; a physical and dynamical description, Henry Stommel. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1958. $6.00. Technical. The Ocean River, Henry Chapin and F. G. Smith. 2d ed. New York, Scribner, 1962. 325 p. $1.65. All about the Gulf Stream and its effects on man. 202 p. The Gulf Stream, Ruth Brindze. Vanguard, 1945. 63 p. $2.50. 10-14. New York, For Children The Gulf Stream, Ruth Brindze, New York, NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 The Circulation of the Oceans, Walter Munk. (Scientific American, vol.193, no.3, Sept. 1955, pp.96-10). World scope. The Cromwell Current, John A. Knauss. (Scientific American vol.20), no.4, April 1961, pp.105-16). About a great submarine current in the central Pacific. The Peru Current, Gerald S. Posner. (Scien- tific American, vol. 190, no.3, March 195), pp.66-71). About a current that comes up the west coast of South America. The Circulation of the Abyss, Henry Stommel. (Scientific American, vol. 199, no.1, July 1958, pp.85-90). About currents in the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean. POLLUTION OF THE OCEAN The Hazards of Atomic Wastes; perspectives and proposals on oceanic disposal, Alton Frye. Washington, Public Affairs Press, 1962. 5 p. $1.00. Radioactive Waste Disposal into Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Waters; a report from a working group of the Committee on Oceano- graphy. . . Washington, 1959. 37 p. (Na- tional Academy of Sciences-National Research Council. Publ. 655). O.p. This and the next four publications are a little technical. Radioactive-waste Disposal into the Sea; report of the Ad Hoc Panel convened by the Director General of the IAEA, under the chairmanship of Henry Brynielsson in Feb. 1960. Vienna, 1961. 174 p. (International Atomic Energy Agency. Safety series, no.5). Disposal of Low-level Radioactive Waste into Pacific Coastal Waters; a report of a work- ing group of the Committee on Oceanography. . . Washington, 1962. 87 p. (National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council. Publ. 985). $2.00. Considerations of the Disposal of Radioactive Wastes from Nuclear-powered Ships into the Marine environment, the Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation on Oceanography and Fisheries . .. Washington, 1959. (National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council. Publ.658). O.p. A Study of the Disposal of Chemical Waste at Sea, Alfred Charles Redfield and L. A. Walford. Washington, 1951. 52p. (Na- tional Academy of Sciences-National Research Council. Publ. 201). $1.00. 181 SEDIMENTS AND STRATIGRAPHY Sedimentary Rocks, Francis John Pettijohn. 2d ed. New York, Harper, 1957. 718 p. $12.00. Detailed college textbook. Manual of Sedimentary Petrography, William Christian Krumbein and F. J. Pettijohn. New York, Appleton, 1938. 5h9 p. $6.50. Advanced college text; old, but contains the best analysis of loose sedimentary deposits. Principles of Sedimentation, William Henry Twenhofel. 2d ed. New York, McGrab-Hill, 1950. 673 p. $11.00. Advanced college text on how sediments are deposited in water. : A Treatise on Sedimentation, William Henry Twenhofel. 2d ed. New York, Dover, 1962. 2 vols. $.70. Reprint of a 1936 classic; technical. Stratigraphy and Sedimentation, William Christian Krumbein and L. L. Sloss. San Francisco, Freeman, 1951. 97 p. $5.00. Integrates stratigraphy and sedimentation; a 2d. ed. is in preparation. Principles of Stratigraphy, Carl Owen Dunbar and John Rodgers. New York, Wiley, 1957. 356 p. $10.00. Advanced, yet very clear college text on how to read geologic history from water-laid deposits. Stratigraphic Principles and Practice, James Marvin Weller. New York, Harper, 1960. 725.p. $10.00. Advanced college textbook. Recent Marine Sediments: a symposium. 6 Parker Davies Trask. Rev.ed. Tulsa, 1955. 736 p. (Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogistis. Special publ. no. }). $5.00. Technical Recent Sediments, Northwest Gulf of Mexico; & symposium summarizing the results of work carried on in Project 51 of the American Petroleum Institute, 1951-1958, edited by Francis Parker Shepard and others, Scripps Institute of Oceanography. Tulsa, American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 1960. 39h p. $7.00. Technical. GEOLOGICAL OCEANOGRAPHY: GEOLOGY OF THE SEA BOTTOM AND COASTS. A. Technical. Coastal and Submarine Morphology, Andre Guilcher. New York, Wiley, 1958. 27h p. $6.50. College textbook. 182 Marine Geology, Philip Henry Kuenen. New York, Wiley, 1950. 568 p. $9.50. College textbook. Submarine Geology, Francis Parker Shepard. New York, Harper, 1948. 348 p. $6.00. College textbook. The Floor of the Ocean; new light on old mysteries, Reginald Aldworth Daly. Chapel Hill, N.C., University of North Carolina Press, 1942. 177 p. Somewhat dated in spots. Glaciological Research on the North Atlantic Coasts, Hans W:son Ahlmann. London, 1948. 83 p. (Royal Geographical Society. RGS research series, no.1). Beaches and Coasts, Cuchlaine A. M. King. London, Arnold, 1960. 03 p. Shore Processes and Shoreline Development, Douglas Wilson Johnson. New York, 1919. 58, p. In part replaced by King's book, listed above. Salt Marshes and Salt Deserts of the World, Valentine Jackson Chapman. New York, Inter- science, 1960. 392 p. $14.50. Geology and ecology. Coastal Changes, William Washington Williams. London, Routledge, 1960. 220 p. On the geological and engineering aspects of shore protection; slight British slant. The New England Acadian Shoreline, Douglas Wilson Johnson. New York, Wiley, 1925. 608 p. Atlantic Submarine Valleys of the United States and the Congo Submarine Valley, Arthur-Clifford Veatch and P.A. Smith. New York, 1939. 101 p. (Geological Society of America. Special paper no. 7). $).80. The Sea off Southern California; a modern habitat of petroleum, Kenneth Orris Emery. New York, Wiley, 1960. 366 p. $12.50. Submarine Topography off the California Coast; canyons and tectonic interpretation, Francis Parker Shepard and K. 0. Emery. New York, 1941. 171 p. (Geological Society of America. Special paper no. 31). O.p. Sunken Islands of the Mid-Pacific Mountains, Edwin L. Hamilton. New York, 1956. 97 p. (Geological Society of America. Memoir 6h). $2.50. The Floor of the Oceans, Bruce C. Heezen and others. Vol.1, The North Atlantic. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Text to accompany the Physiographic diagram of the North Atlantic. New York, 1959. 122 p. (Geological Society of America. Special paper no. 65). Map, $1.50; text, $4.50. B. Nontechnical. The Earth Beneath the Sea, Francis Parker Shepard. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins Press, 1959. 275 p. $5.00. Fine book on the geology of the coasts and sea bottom. The Ocean Floor, Hans Petterseon. New Haven, Yale University Press, 1954. 181 p. $3.75. Under the Deep Oceans; twentieth Century Voyages of discovery, Thomas Frohock Gaskell. New York, Norton, 1960. 239 p. $3.75. Mainly an account of sea-bottom geology rather than the story of the Challenger's 1950 voyage. The Last Geographic Frontier; the sea floor, Edwin L. Hamilton. (Scientific Monthly, vol.85. 1957, pp.294-31h). The Changing Level of the Sea, Rhodes W. Fairbridge. (Scientific American, vol. 202, no. 5, May 1960, pp.70-79). Effects of glaciation on sea level. The Magnetism of the Ocean Floor, Arthur D. Raff. (Scientific American, vol. 205, no., Oct. 1961, pp.146-56). Seismic Shooting at Sea, Maurice Ewing and Leonard Engel. (Scientific American, vol. 206, no.5, May 1962, pp.116-26). How the sea floor is studied. The Pacific Floor, Robert S. Dietz. (Scien- tific American, vol. 186, no.4, April 1952, pp.19-23). Fractures in the Pacific Floor, Henry W. Menard. (Scientific American, vol. 193, no.1, July 1955. pp.36-l1). The East Pacific Rise, Henry W. Menard. (Scientific American, vol. 205, no.6. Dec. 1961, pp.52-61). The Trenches of the Pacific, Robert L. Fisher and Roger Revelle. (Scientific American, vol. 193, no.5, Nov. 1955, pp.36- yl). An Introduction to the Geology and Mineral Resources of the Continental. Shelves of the Americas, James Van Alen Trumbull and others. Washington, G.P.0., 1958. 92p. (U.S. Geological Survey. Bulletin 1067). Sold only by the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington 25, Do Boy ste Seo NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 1 83 Submarine Physiography of the U. S. Continental Margins, G. F. Jordan. Washington, G.P.0., 1962. 28 p. (U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey. Technical bulletin, no. 18). $0.20. The Continental Shelf, Henry C. Stetson. (Scientific American, vol. 192, no.3, March 1955, pp.82-86). U. S. Coasts. The Origin of Submarine Canyons, Bruce C. Heezen. (Scientific American, vol.195, no.2, Aug. 1956, pp.36-1). The Physical Geography of Beaches and Coast- lines, Ronald Kay Gresswell. London, Hulton Educational Publications, 1957. 128 p. Most interesting and useful, despite its British slant. Beaches, Willard Bascom. (Scientific Amer- ican, vol. 203, no.2, Aug. 1960, pp.80-92). Our Changing Atlantic Coastline, Nathaniel T. Kenney. (National Geographic Magazine, vol. 122, no.6, Dec. 1962, pp.860-87). The effects of the storm of March 7, 1962, on the coast between Long Island and Cape Hatteras. Florida Dunes and Scrub; vegetation and geology, Herman Kurz. Tallahassee, 192. 15h p. (Florida. Geological Survey. Geo- logical bulletin, no.23). Coastal geology and ecology. Oregon's Sidewalk on the Sea, Paul A. Zahl. (National Geographic Magazine, vol. 120, no.5, Nov. 1961, pp.208-34). Biology, agate collecting. The Fiord Region of East Greenland, Louise Arner Boyd. New York, 1935. 369 p. (Amer- ican Geographic Society. Special publ. no.18). Finely illustrated account of a glaciated coast. The Coastline of England and Wales in Pictures; James Alfred Steers. Cambridge, Eng., Univer- sity Press, 1960. 145 p. Splendid picture book; although they are concerned only with the British coasts, this and the following charming volume may intrigue American readers. The Sea Coast, James Alfred Steers. London. Collins, 1953. 276 p. THE MOHOLE A Hole in the Bottom of the Sea; the story of the Mohole project, Willard Bascom. Garden City, New York, Doubleday, 1961. 352 p. $4.95. All about the hole to be drilled into the sea bottom, where the earth's crust is thinnest, to determine the nature of the original rock making up the earth's interior. The Mohole, Willard Bascom. (Scientific American, vol. 200, no.4, April 1959, pp. 41-9). Scientists Drill at Sea to Pierce Earth's Crust, Samuel W. Matthews. (National Geographic Magazine, vol. 120, no.5, Nov. 1961, pp.686-97). Easy, with many pictures. Experimental Drilling in Deep Water at La Jolla and Guadalupe Sites. Washington 1961. 183 p. (National Academy of Sciences-Na- tional Research Council. Publication no. 914). $3.00. Design for a Deep Ocean Drilling Ship. Washington, 1962. 173 p. (National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council. Publication no.848). O.p. ISLANDS AND CORAL REEFS. Atoll Environment and Ecology. Herold Jacob Wiens. New Haven, Yale University Press, 1962. 532 p. $15.00. Geology, geography, and natural history of a large number of tropical islands. Handbook for Atoll Research, Francis Raymond Fosberg and M. H. Sachet. Washington, 1953. 129 p. (National Research Council. Pacific Science Board. Atoll research bulletin, no.17). How to investigate, collect, and photograph. Coral Island; portrait of an atoll, Marston Bates and D. P. Abbott. New York. Scribner, 1958. 254 p. $4.95. Charming account of a scientific survey of Ifaluk, in the Caroline Islands. Coral Reefs and Atolls, John Stanley Gardiner. London, Macmillan, 1931. 181 p. The Coral Reef Problem, William Morris Davis. New York. 1928. 596 p. (American Geograph- ical Society. Special publication no.9). Somewhat technical but informative survey of the world's coral reefs; emphasizes geology. The Structure and Distribution of Coral Reefs, Charles Robert Darwin. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1962. 214 p. $1.95. A classic, first published in 182. since proven correct by recent research. A Year on the Great Barrier Reef; the story of corals and of the greatest of their creations, Charles Maurice Yonge. New York, Putnam, 1930. 246 p. This and the next two 184 references are fine accounts of the great Australian reef and of the creatures that live thereon. Wonders of the Great Barrier, Theodore Cleveland Roughley. New York, Scribner, 1917. 282 p. $5.00. The Great Barrier Reef and Adjacent Isles, Keith Gillett and Frank McNeill. Rev.ed. Sydney, Coral Press, 1962. 209 p. Magnifi- cently illustrated. On Australia's Coral Ramparts, Paul A. Zahl. (National Geographic Magazine, vol. 111, no.l, Jan. 1957, pp-1-l\8). Easy, with fine pictures. Questions of the Coral Reefs, Norman D. Newell. (Natural History, vol.68, 1959, pp.118-31). Biology of the Corals, Norman D. Newell. (Natural History, vol.68, 1959, pp.226-35). Atlantic Reef Corals; a handbook of the common reef and shallow-water corals of Bermuda, Florida, the West Indies and Brazil, Frederick George Walton Smith. New York. Farrar, Strauss, 1948. 112 p. Florida's Coral City Beneath the Sea. Jerry Greenberg. (National Geographic Magazine, vol. 121, no.1l, Jan. 1962, pp. 70-89). This and the next title deal with the John Pennekamp Coral Reef State Park. Key Largo Coral Reef; America's first under- sea park, Charles M. Brookfield. (National Geographic Magazine, vol. 121, no.1, Jan. 1962, pp.58-69). Geology of the Isles of Shoals, Katherine Stevens Fowler-Billings. Concord, New Hampshire State Planning and Development Commission, 1959. 51 p. About a group of islands just off the New Hampshire coast. Topographic map, Acadia National Park and vicinity, Hancock County, Maine... 1:31, 680. Washington, U. S. Geological Survey, 192. O.p. Text on verso: The Geology of Mount Desert Island, George McLane Wood. This is the only example of fiord coastline in the eastern United States. Sea Islands of Georgia; their geologic history, Count Dillon Gibson. Athens, Georgia, University of Georgia Press, 198. 73 p- $2.00. The Ocean Island (Inagua), Gilbert C. Klingel. Garden City, New York, Doubleday-Anchor, 1961. 415 p. $1.45. Natural history of a Carib- bean island. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Galapagos, World's End, Charles William Beebe. New York, Putnam, 1928. 43 p. Natural history of the island group. The Galapagos Islands; a history of cheir exploration, Joseph Richard Slevin. San Francisco, 1959. 150 p. (California Academy of Sciences. Occasional papers, no.25). An Island is Born; Oahu roars up from the deep. . . Nora Dowell Stearns. Honolulu, Honolulu Star-Bulletin Co., 1935. 115 p. Geologic Map and Guide of the Island of Oahu, Hawaii. . . Harold Thornton Stearns. Honolulu, 1939. 75 p. (Hawaii Division of Hydrography. Bulletin 2). This and the next title are a little technical, but very informative. Geology of the Hawaiian Islands, Harold Thornton Stearns. Honolulu, 196. 106 p. (Hawaii. Division of Hydrography. Bulletin 8). The Explosive Birth of Myojin Island, Robert S. Dietz. (National Geographic Magazine, vol. 105, no.1, Jan. 1954, pp.117-28). About the 1952 eruption in the Pacific, south of Tokyo. A New Volcano Bursts from the Atlantic, John Scofield. (National Geographic Magazine, vol. 113, no.6, June 1958, pp.735- 57). Im the Azores Islands, 1957. Tristan da Cunha: death of an Island, P.J. G. Wheeler. (National Geographic Magazine, vol. 121, no.5, May 1962, pp.679-95). Volcanic eruption of 1961. Lost Continents; the Atlantis theme in history, science, and literature, Lyon Sprague DeCamp. New York, Gnome Press, 1954. 362 p. $5.00. Legendary Islands of the Atlantic; a study in medieval geography, William Henry Babcock. New York, 1922. 196 p. (American Geo- graphical Society. Research series, no.8). Includes information on Atlantis. LEGAL ASPECTS OF THE SEA The Public Order of the Oceans; a contemporary international law of the sea, Myres Smith McDougal and William T. Burke. New Haven, Yale University Press. 1962. 1226 p. $12.50. The Continental Shelf, Martinus Willem Mouton. The Hague, Nijhoff, 1952. 367 p. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 The Tidelands Oil Controversy; a legal and historical analysis, Ernest R. Bartley. Austin, University of Texas Press, 1953. 312 p. $5.00. Shore and Sea Boundaries, with Special Reference to the Interpretation and Use of Coast and Geodetic Survey Data, Aaron Louis Shalowitz. Washington, G.P.0., 1962-63. 2vols. (U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey. Pulbication 10). Vol. 1, $3.50. from Gov- ernment Printing Office; vol.2, in press. About boundary problems associated with the submerged lands cases. NAVIGATION American Practical Navigator, Nathaniel Bowditch. Washington, G.P.0., 1958. 152) p. (U.S. Hydrographic Office. H.0O. Publication no.9). Sold by the Hydrographic Office or the Government Printing Office, for $6.25. A comprehensive manual of useful data. Dutton's Navigating and Piloting, Benjamin Dutton, edited by John Clayton Hill, II, and others. Annapolis, Maryland, United States Naval Institute, 1958. 771 p. $8.00. This and the next two titles are college textbooks, comprehensive, with much mathematics. Marine Navigation, Philip Van Horn Weems and ©. V. Lee. 2d ed. Annapolis, Md., Weems System of Navigation, Inc., 1958. 455 p. $7.50. Basic Marine Navigation, Bart Jan Bok and F. W. Wright. 2d ed. Boston, Houghton Mifflin, 1952. 2h p. $6.75. Primer of Navigation. . . George Webber Mixter. lth ed., rev. by Donald McClench. Princeton, New Jersey, Van Nostrand, 1960. 553 p. $9.50. Introductory text, compre- hensive, but with a minimum of mathematics. Navigation, Henry Brinton and P. Moore. London, Methuen, 1961. 72 p. This and the next two titles are easy and non-mathematical. Navigation the Easy Way, Carl Daniel Lane and John Montgomery. New York, Norton, 199. $h.75. Little Ship Astro-navigation, M. J. Rantzen. New York, Philosophical Library, 1952. 160 p. $4.75. A Guide to Ocean Navigation, Frank Edgar Knight. New York, St. Martin's Press, 1959. 177 p. Features a historical, rather than a practical, approach to the art of naviga- tion. $.25. 185 Nautical Almanac, for the year. . . Pub- lished annually by the Nautical Almanac Office, U.S. Naval Observatory, Washington, D.C. Sold only by the Government Printing Office, for $2.00. Contains the astro- nomical data needed to navigate on the high seas, United States Coast Pilots. New editions are published from time to time by the U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey, Washington 25, D. C. 8 vols. Sold only by the Coast and Geodetic Survey and its outlets. Provides information on coasts and harbors that is not included on the Coast charts. Coast Charts. New editions of these maps of our coasts and harbors are published from time to time by the U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey, Washington 25, D. ©. Sold only by the Coast and Geodetic Survey and its outlets. Catalog of Nautical Charts and Related Publications. New editions of this catalog are published from time to time by the U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey, Washington 25, D. C. Free from the Coast and Geodetic Survey. This catalog lists Coast Charts, Coast Pilots, and other publications useful in cruising along the U. S. coasts; tells how and where to buy them. Catalog of Nautical Charts and Publications. New editions of this catalog are published from time to time by the U. S. Navy Hydro- graphic Office, Washington 25, D. C. Free from the Hydrographic Office. This catalog lists Nautical Charts, Sailing Directions, and other publications useful in sailing the high seas; tells how to buy them. The Boatman's Manual; a complete manual of boat handling, operation, maintenance and seamanship, Carl Daniel Lane. Rev. ed. New York, Norton, 1951. 596 p. $6.50. This and the next two titles provide informa- tion useful for the week-end sailor, on such matters as rigging, equipment, navigation, weather, communication, and business. Seamanship, a practical manual. Charles Frederic Chapman. New York, Motor Boating, 1951. 258 p. (Motor Boating's ideal series, vol.19). $2.00. A Beginner's Guide to the Sea, Frank Knight. New York, St. Martin's Press, 1955." 23h p. $2.75. The Experts! Book of Boating, edited by Ruth Brindze. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey. Prentice-Hall, 1959. 291 p. $5.95. Experts discuss 21 topics, such as cooking. sails, 186 10. sale navigation, and boat handling. HISTORY OF NAVIGATION. A History of the Practice of Navigation, J. B. Hewson. Glasgow, Brown, Son, and Ferguson, 1951. 270 p. Scholarly and detailed. The Sky and the Sailor; a history of celestial navigation, Harold A. Calahan. New York, Harper, 1952. 262 p. $).00. A History of Marine Navigation, Per Collinder. New York, St. Martin's Press, 1955. 195 p. $4.25. Easy. The Haven-finding Art; a history of naviga- tion from Odysseus to Captain Cook, Eva Germaine Rimington Taylor. New York, Abelard-Schuman, 1957. 295 p. $6.00. includes a good bibliography. Easy; The Evolution of Celestial Navigation, Charles Louis Petze, Jr. New York, Motor Boating, 1948. 104 p. Not chronological, but arranged by subject; abundantly illustrated. The Art of Navigation in Ingland in Elizabethan and Early Stuart Times, David Watkin Waters. New Haven, Yale University Press, 1958. 696 p. $12.50. CHART MAKING AND HISTORY OF CHART MAKING Navigational Observations. 2d. ed. (U. S. Navy Hydrographic Office. Publ. no. 606A, Hydrographic Observer's Manual). Washington, G.P.0., 1956. 30 p. Sold by the Hydrographic Office for $0.50. How the mariner can help the Hydrographic Office keep its charts up-to-date. Nautical Chart Manual. H. R. Edmonston. 4th ed. Washington, U. S. Coast and Geo- detic Survey, 1956. 81 p. Sold by Coast and Geodetic Survey, for $3.00. All about the rules and practices, format, terms, and symbols that appear on its charts. Hydrographic Manual, Karl B. Jeffers. Washington, G.P.0., 1960. 283 p. (U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey. Publication 20-2). Sold by Government Printing Office for $2.00. This and the following book describe how hydrographic surveys are made; technical. Hydrographic Manual, Kenneth T. Adams. Rev. ed. Washington, G.P.0., 1942. 90 p. (U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey. Special publieation no. 143). O.P. Contains much 12. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 information not in publication 20-2. Manual of Coastal Delineation from Aerial Photographs, Philip G. McCurd. Washington, 19h7. 143 p. (U.S. Navy Hydrographic Office. Publ. no. 592). Sold by the Hydro- graphic Office for $1.50. On making coast charts from air photos. Wire Drag Manual, Kenneth S. Ulm. Washington. G.P.0., 1959. 103 p. (U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey. Publ. 20-1). Sold by the Government Printing Office for $0.35. How the Coast Survey locates wrecks, reefs, and rocks. Surveys of the Seas; a brief history of British hydrography, Mary Blewitt. London, Macgibbon & Kee, 1957. 168 p. Handsomely illustrated and most interesting. Marine Cartography in Britain; a history of the sea chart to 1855, Adrian H. W. Robinson. Leicester, Eng., Leicester University Press, 1962. 222 p. GENERAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROCEDURE, TECHNIQUES, INSTRUMENTATION, AND EQUIPMENT. Sources of Limnological and Oceanographic Apparatus and Supplies, 1959: American Society of Limnology and Oceanography, Special publication, no.l. (Limnology and Oceanography, vol.4, 1959, pp.357-65). Oceanography and Marine Biology; a book of techniques, Harold Barnes. New York, MacMillan, 1959. 218 p. $7.00. Non- technical summary of techniques and equip- ment, including photography. Apparatus and Methods of Oceanography. Part 1, Chemical, Harold Barnes. New York, Inter- science, 1959. 31 p. $5.75. This and the next six books are rather technical. Instruction Manual for Oceanographic Observations. 2d. ed. Washington, 1955. 210 p. (U. S. Navy Hydrographic Office. Publ. no. 607). Sold by the Hydrographic Office for $12.00. How oceanographic data is collected by the Navy. Processing Oceanographic Data. E. C. LaFond. Washington, G.P.0., 1951. lly p. (U. S. Navy Hydrographic Office. Publ. no. 61). Sold by the Hydrographic Office for $7.00. Symposium on Oceanographic Instrumentation. . . John D. Isaacs and C. O'D.Iselin. Washington, 1952. 233 p. (National Academy of Sciences- National Research Council. Publ. no. 309). O.P. 13. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Marine Sciences Instrumentation. . . Vol.1, A collection of papers presented at the Marine Conference. . Woods Hole, 1961, edited by Roy D. Gaul. New York, Plenum Press, 1962. 354 p. $12.50. Oceanography Vessels of the World; a joint publication of IGY World Data Center A for Oceanography and the National Oceanographic Data Center, compiled by Luis R. A. Capurro and others. Washington, printed by U. S. Naval Oceanographic Office. 1961. 1 vol. (National Oceanographic Data Center general series, Publication G-2). Sold by the Oceanographic Office for $4.50. Proceedings, Government-industry Oceanographic Instrumentation Symposium, sponsored by the Interagency Committee on Oceanography. . . 1961. Edited by Julius Rockwell. Washington, Miller-Columbian Reporting Service, 1962. 482 p. $6.00. SURVIVAL AT SEA: SAFETY, HEALTH. The Raft Book, Harold Gatty. New York, George Grady Press, 1943. 152 p. Survival and navigation book for castaways. Know-how in the Surf, John Bloomfield. Melbourne, Angus and Robertson, 1959. Safety on the beach. 205 p. Dangerous Marine Animals, Bruce W. Halstead. Cambridge, Maryland, Cornell Maritime Press, 1959. 16 p. $4.00. About creatures that sting, bite, or are poisonous to eat. Sea Pests; poisonous or harmful sea life of Florida and the West Indies, Craig Phillips and W. H. Brady. Coral Gables, Florida, University of Miami Press,1953. 78 p. Proceedings of the Underwater Physiology Symposium, January 10-11, 1955, Washington, D.C... . Loyal G. Goff, editor. Washington 1955. 153 p. (National Academy of Sciences- National Research Council. Publ. 377). Collection of articles on oxygen toxicity, bends, respiratory problems, etc. O.P. A Survey Report on Human Factors in Under- sea Warfare. the Committee on Undersea Warfare. Washington, National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council, 199. 541 p. $3.00. Underwater Medicine, Stanley Miles. Phil- adelphia, Lippincott, 1962. 328 p. $10.00. On underwater physiology, hazards, safety, medicine. 10. 187 1,. DIVING. A. General Man Under the Sea, James Dugan. New York. Collier Books, 1963. 332 p. $1.50. In press. Originally published in 1956, this is an informal history of man's varied underseas activities: submarine archaeology, treasure search, undersea warfare, mineral prospecting, submarines, etc. Famous Underwater Adventurers, Frederic Wagner. New York, Dodd, Mead, 1962. 159 p. $3.00. Good brief biographies of Robert Gulton, Simon Lake, William Beebe, the Piccards, Cousteau, and seven other experts, for ages 10-15. B. Bathysphere and Bathyscaph Diving Half Mile Down, Charles William Beebe, New York, Harcourt, 193). 33h p. About the Beebe-Barton descent to 2500 feet, off Bermuda, in 193). 2000 Fathoms Down, Georges S. Houot and Pierre Henri Willm. New York, Dutton, 1955. 192 p. $4.75. Enthusiastic account of dives in a French bathyscaph, 197 to 1953. Seven Miles Down; the story of the bathy- scaph Trieste, Jacques Piccard and Richard S. Dietz. New York, Putnam, 1961. 256 p. $5.00. First-hand account of the dive of January 23, 1960, and of the dives. leading up to it. Man's Deepest Dive, Jacques Piccard. (Na- tional Geographic Magazine, vol.118. no.2, Aug. 1960, pp.22)-39). About the dive of January 23, 1960. Four Years of Diving to the Bottom of the Sea, Georges S. Houot. (National Geographic Magazine, vol.113, no.5, May 1958, pp.71h- 31). This and the next three items deal with French bathyscaph dives, in the Mediterranean. Two and a Half Miles Down, Georges S. Houot. (National Geographic Magazine, vol. 106, no.l, July 1954, pp.80-86). Diving Through an Undersea Avalanche, Jacques-Yves Cousteau. (National Geographic Magazine. vol. 107, no.4, April 1955, pp.538-2). To the Depths of the Sea by Bathyscaphe, Jacques-Yves Cousteau. (National Geographic Magazine, vol.106. no.1. July 195). pp.67-79). C. Helmet and Hose Diving. 188 Deep Diving and Submarine Operations; a manual for deep sea divers and compressed air workers, Robert Henry Davis. 6th ed. London, Siebe, Gorman, 1955. 693 p. On the history and techniques of deep diving. Diving Manual, U. S. Department of the Navy. Washington, G.P.0., 1960. 56 p. How the Navy does it. Sold by the Government Print- ing Office for $).25. Marine Salvage Operations, Edward Michael Brady. Cambridge, Maryland, Cornell Maritime Press, 1960. 237 p. $8.50. Down to the Ships in the Sea, Harry Grossett. New York, Lippincott, 1954. 256 p. Fine life of a veteran helmet diver. Other writers on salvage include Edward Ellsberg and David Masters. Deep Down Under, John Joseph Floherty. Philadelphia, Lippincott, 1953. 16 p. #3.75. A career book, for boys 12 to 15, on the engineering and salvage accomplish- ments of professional divers. D. Skin and Scuba Diving. Basic Scuba, self-contained underwater breathing apparatus, Fred M. Roberts. Princeton, New Jersey, Van Nostrand, 1960. 386 p. $8.50. This and the next title are good basic books, stressing equipment, physiology, swimming, and safety. The New Science of Skin and Scuba Diving. . . by the Conference for National Co-operation in Aquatics. Rev.ed. New York, Association Press, 1962. 208 p. $2.95. The Skin Diver; a complete guide to the underwater world, Elgin Ciampi. New York, Roland Press, 1960. 315 p. $6.00. Fine. This and the next three titles are broader in scope than the two listed above, if less detailed, and include information on under- water activities, such as spearfishing, photography, and wreck exploration. Many similar but not always satisfactory books are not listed here. 130 Feet Down; handbook for hydronauts, Hank and Shaney Frey. New York, Harcourt, 1961. 27h p. $6.50. Underwater Diving Manual; the British Sub- Aqua Club official instructions on under- water swimming techniques, George F. Brookes and A. V. Broadhurst. Newton Center, Mass. Charles T. Branford, 1961. 239 p. $5.00. Our World Underwater, William M. Stephens. New York, Lantern Press, 1962. 252 p. $.95. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 A History of Self-contained Diving and Under- water Swimming, Howard E. Larson. Prep. for the Office of Naval Research under the auspices of the Committee on Undersea War- fare. Washington. 1959. 50 p. (National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council. Publ. no. 469). $1.50. Skin Diver's and Spearfisherman's Guide to American Waters. . Hilbert Van Nydeck Schenck. Cambridge, Maryland, Cornell Maritime Press, 1955. 55 p. $1.75. on locations. Strong The Silent World, Jacques-Yves Cousteau. New York, Harper, 1953. 266 p. $5.00. This and the next three books deal with the pioneering work of the French skin divers Cousteau, Huout, and Tailliez; lack of space prevents the listing of many more titles on skin diving and pearl fishing. The Living Sea, Jacques-Yves Cousteau and James Dugan. New York, Harper, 1963. $5.95. In press. Sequel to The Silent World, describing Cousteau's adventures since 1951. Undersea Explorer; the story of Captain Cousteau, James Dugan. New York, Harper, 1957. 143 p. $2.95. For ages 10 to 15. To Hidden Depths, Philippe Tailliez. New York, Dutton, 1954. 188 p. Lady with a Spear, Eugenie Clark. New York, Harper, 1953. 243 p. $h.50. Fine and informative; the exploits of a lady marine biologist. Fish Men Explore a New World Underseas, Jacques-Yves Cousteau. (National Geographic Magazine, vol. 102, no.4. Oct. 1952. pp.431-72). Diving Saucer Takes to the Deep, Jacques- Yves Cousteau. (National Geographic Magazine, vol. 117, no.4, April 1960, pp.570-86). About a midget 2-man submarine for underwater exploration. Diving for Science, Lynn Poole. New York, Whittlesey, 1955. 160 p. $2.75. On the techniques and especially the scientific uses of skin diving, in fisheries investiga- tion, the search for minerals, cave study, and underwater photography, for ages 10 to 14. Underwater Work; a manual of scuba commercial, salvage and construction operations, John E. Cayford. Cambridge, Maryland, Cornell Maritime Press, 1959. 217 p. $5.00. Scuba, not helmet and hose. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 15. SUBMARINE ARCHAEOLOGY AND TREASURE DIVING. The Treasure Diver's Guide, John Stauffer Potter. Garden City, New York, Doubleday, 1960. 501 p. $9.50. Mainly a list of wrecks, arranged by area; includes informa- tion on how to identify wrecked galleons and on other aspects of submarine archaeology. Not always accurate, but the only thing of this sort available. Deep Water Archaeology, Frederic Dumas. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1962. 71 p. Practical handbook by an expert. Ships, Shoals, and Amphoras; the story of underwater archaeology, Suzanne De Borhegyi. New York, Holt, 1961. 176 p. $h.95. A dependable, informal history. History Under the Sea, Mendel L. Peterson. Washington, G.P.0O., 1954. 16 p. (Smithsonian Institution. Publication 17). A Smith- sonian archaeologist tells how to explore wrecks and preserve relics. History Under the Sea, Mendel L. Peterson. Washington, G.P.0., 1963. 200 p. (Smith- sonian Institution Publication). In press; an amplification of the item above. Finding History Under the Sea, D. A. Heller. (Natural History, vol.6, no.9, Nov. 1955, pp-492-95). About Peterson's explorations with Link and the Criles, concerning which see the next two titles listed below. Sea Diver; a quest for history under the sea, Marion Clayton Link. New York, Rinehart, 1959. 333 p. $4.95. Vivid account of skin diving for wrecks in the Carribbean. Only a few of the best books and articles on treasure diving can be mentioned here. Treasure-Diving Holidays, Jane and Barney Crile. New York, Viking, 1954. 263 p. $4.50. Diving for Pleasure and Treasure, Clay Blair, Jr. Cleveland, World, 1960. 28 p. $4.95. Searching for the Monitor and for wrecks off the coast of Mexico. 4,000 Years Under the Sea, Philippe Diole. New York, Messner, 1954. 237 p. $h.50. Classic on submarine archaeology in the Mediterranean area. 1,600 Years Under the Sea, Ted Falcon-Barker. New York, McKay, 1960. 225 p. $h.50. Operations near Epidauros, Greece. Oldest Known Siipwreck Yields Bronze Age 16. 189 Cargo, Peter Throckmorton. (National Geo- graphic Magazine, vol. 121, no.5, May 1962, pp.697-711). Concerns the remains of a ship sunk about 1000 B.C. off the west coast of Turkey. Thirty-three Centuries Under the Sea, Peter Throckmorton. (National Geographic Magazine, vol. 117, no.5, May 1960, pp.682-703). About wrecks off the Turkish coast. Fish Men Discover a 2,200-Year-Old Greek Wreck, Jacques-Yves Cousteau. (National Geographic Magazine, vol.105. no.1, Jan. 195), pp.1-36). About a wine-ship sunk near Marseilles. Exploring the Drowned City of Port Royal, Marion Clayton Link. (National Geographic Magazine, vol.117. no.2, Feb. 1960. pp.151- 83). Port Royal was submerged during the Jamaica quake of 1962. I Found the Bones of the Bounty, Luis Marden. (National Geographic Magazine, vol.112, no.6, Dec. 1957. pp.725-89). UNDERWATER PHOTOGRAPHY. A Guide to Underwater Photography, Dimitri Rebikoff and Paul Cherney. 2d ed. New York, Greenberg, 1955. 113 p. $1.95. The first four titles deal with shallow-water photography, the next three with deep-water photography. Underwater Photography, Hilbert Van Nydeck Schenck and H. W. Kendall. Cambridge, Maryland, Cornell Maritime Press, 1957. 126 p. $3.50. Underwater Photography and Television, Ellis Royal Cross. New York, Exposition Press, 1954. 258 p. $6.00. Camera Under the Sea, Luis Marden. (Na- tional Geographic Magazine, vol. 109, no.2, Feb. 1956, pp.162-200). Exploring Davy Jones's Locker with Calypso, Jacques-Yves Cousteau. (National Geographic Magazine. vol. 109, no.2, Feb. 1956, pp.1)9- 61). Testing the new Edgerton deep-sea camera at the end of a two-mile line. Calypso Explores an Undersea Canyon, Jacques-Yves Cousteau. (National Geographic Magazine, vol.113, no.3, March 1958, pp.373- 96). Photographing the Sea's Dark Underworld, Harold E. Edgerton. (National Geographic Magazine, vol.107. no.4, April 1955, pp.523- 37). - 190 17. 18. Underwater Television, W. R. Stamp. (Scien- tific American, vol. 188, no.6, June 1953, pp 32-37). MARINE METEOROLOGY. Oceanography for Meteorologists, Harald Ulrik Sverdrup. New York, Prentice-Hall. 1942. 2h6 p. Technical. Meteorology, with marine applications, William L. Donn. 2d. ed. New York, McGraw- Hill, 1951. 65 p. $7.00. Easy college text, for layman, student, and mariner. A Mariner's Meteorology, Charles Greham Halpine and Halton Hagen Taylor. Princeton, New Jersey, Van Nostrad, 1956. 371 p. $8.00. Textbook for Naval Academy Midshipmen. Oceanography for the Navy Meteorologist. Norfolk, U.S. Navy Weather Research Facility, 1960. 128 p. (NavWeps 50-1P-547). Tech- nical and specialized. Atlantic Hurricanes, Gordon E. Dunn and Banner J. Miller. Baton Rouge, Louisiana State University Press, 1960. 290 p. $10.00. Technical. Hurricanes, Their Nature and History: particularly those of the West Indies and the southern coasts of the United States, Ivan Ray Tannehill. 9th ed. Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press, 1956. 308 p. $4.50. Hurricane, Marjory Stoneman Douglas. New York, Rinehart, 1958. 393 p. $5.95. A most readable history of American hurricanes. Weather of the San Francisco Bay Region. Harold Thompson Gilliam. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1962. 72 p. $1.50. How the ocean affects San Francisco's weather. RESOURCES OF THE SEA (excluding fisheries, for which see section 22). The Sun. the Sea, and Tomorrow; potential sources of food, energy, and minerals from the sea, Frederick George Walton Smith and Henry Chapin. New York, Scribner. 195. 210 2. Ocean Harvest; the future of oceanography. Helen Wolff Vogel and Mary L. Caruso. New York, Knopf, 1961. 144 p. $3.00. The ocean as a potential source of food, minerals, and fresh water, for ages 10 to 19. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Raw Materials from the Sea, Edward Frankland Armstrong and L. M. Miall. Leicester, England. Constructive Publications, Ltd., 1945. 164 p. On the sea as a source of minerals and fresh water. Minerals on the Ocean Floor, John L. Mero. (Scientific American, vol.203, no.6, Dec. 1960, pp.6-72). Calypso Exqplores for Underwater Oil, Jacques- Yves Cousteau. (National Geographic Magazine, vol.107. no.2, Aug. 1955. pp.155-8). Easy. Fresh Water from the Ocean. for Cities, Industry,and Irrigation, Cecil Byrne Ellis. New York, Ronald Press, 1954. 217 p. $6.00. A little technical. Salt-water Purification, K. S. Spiegler. New York, Wiley, 1962. 167 p. $9.50. Summarizes the present state of the art; technical in spots. MARINE BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY. Treatise on Marine Ecology and Paleoecology, Joel Walker Hedgpeth and Harry S. Ladd. New York, 1957. 2 vols. (Geological Society of America. Memoir 67). $22.50. Technical. Marine Ecology. Hilary B. Moore. New York, Wiley, 1958. 93 p. $9.50. College textbook. Zoogeography of the Sea, Sven Petrus Ekman. London. Sidgwick and Jackson. 1953. 17 p. Technical. The Biology of Marine Animals, Joseph Arthur Colin Nicol. New York, Interscience, 1960. 707 p. $1.00. Technical. Aspects of Deep Sea Biology, Norman Bertram Marshall. New York, Philosophical Library. 1954. 380 p. $10.00. Technical. Creatures of the Deep Sea, Klaus Gunther and Kurt Deckert. New York, Scribner, 1956. 222 p. Symposium on Marine Microbiology. Carl k. Oppenheimer. Springfield. Illinois, Thomas, 1963. 928 p. In press. Marine Microbiology: a monograph on hydro- bacteriology, Claude Echraim lobell. Waltham, Mass.. Chronica Botanica, 196. 240 2. Technical. Nature Adrift; the story of marine plankton. cames Fraser. Chester Springs, Pennsylvania, ee ee NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Dufour Editions, 1962. $8.95. In press. The Open Sea; its natural history; Part 1, The world of plankton, Alister Clavering Hardy. Boston, Houghton Mifflin, 1957. 335 p. $6.50. Hardy's books are expert and most readable. The Open Sea; its natural history: Part 2, Fish and fisheries, with chapters on whales, turtles, and animals of the sea floor, Alister Clavering Hardy. Boston, Houghton Mifflin, 1959. 322 p. $7.50. The Underwater Guide to Marine Life, Carleton Ray and Elgin T. Ciampi. New York, A. S. Barnes, 1956. 338 o. $3.75. In- tended for the skin diver; ecology, biology, descriptions of commoner forms of life. The Seas; our knowledge of life in the sea and how it is gained, Frederick Stratten Russell and C. M. Yonge. 2d ed. New York, Warne, 1936. 379 p. $5.00. Marine biology. A Biography of the Sea; the story of the world ocean, its animal and plant populations, and its influence on human history, Richard Carrington. New York, Basic Books, 1960, 285 p. $5.00. Mainly marine biology. The Ocean, Francis Downes Ommanney. New York, Oxford University Press, 1949. 2h5 p. $2.00. Mainly marine biology. Under the Sea, Maurice Burton. New York, Watts, 1962. 256 p. $4.95. of marine animals: easy. Natural history The Oceanic Life of the Antarctic, Robert Cushman Murphy. (Scientific American, vol. 207, no.3, Sept. 1962, pp. 186-210). The Kingdom of the Octopus; the life history of the Cephalopoda, Frank Walter Lane. New York, Sheridan House, 1960. 300 p. $7.50. Paperback, New York, Pyramid Books, 1962. 287 p. $.75. The Case of the Sea-serpent, Rupert Thomas Gould. London, Philip Allan, 193). 291 p. The author weighs the pros and cons. SEAWEED . How to Know the Seaweeds; an illustrated manual for identifying the more common marine algae of both our Atlantic and Pacific coasts. . ., Elmer Yale Dawson. Dubuque, Iowa, W. C. Brown, 1956. 197 p. $2.25. Marine Algae of the Northeastern Coast of 21% 191 North America, William Randolph Taylor. 2d ed. Ann Arbor, 1957. 509 p. (University of Michigan studies, Scientific series, vol. 13). Technical Seaweeds at Ebb Tide, Muriel Lewin Guberlet. Seattle, University of Washington Press, 1961, 198 p. $2.95. For identifying Pacific coast algae. Seaweeds and Their Uses. Valentine Jackson Chapman. New York, Pitman, 1952. 287 p. All about seaweed, except identification. FISHES. Ichthyology, Karl Frank Lagler and others. New York, Wiley, 1962. 545 p. Im press. College text. Ecology of Fishes, G. V. Nikolsky. New York, Academic Press, 1962. $12.00. In press. Technical The Physiology of Fishes, Margaret Elizabeth Brown. New York, Academic Press, 1957. 2 vols., each $14.00. Detailed, technical account of fish metabolism and behavior. A History of the Fishes, John Roxbrough Norman. 2d ed. New York, Hillé-ang, 463 p. Anatomy, physiology, ecology, geological history, and relations to man. $6.00. A Study of Fish, Chapman Pincher. Duell, Sloan and Pearce, 198. anatomy and physiology. New York, 343 p. Fish The Ways of Fishes, Leonard Peter Schultz and Edith M. Stern. New York, Van Nostrand. 1948. 264 p. $6.00 The Life Story of the Fish; his morals and manners, Brian Curtis. New York, Dover, 1962. 293 p. $1.50. Fish anatomy, physi- ology, and behavior. Living Fishes of the World, Eral Stannard Herald. Garden City, New York, Doubleday, 1961. 303 p. $12.50. A systematic survey, with numerous fine photographs, many in color. Fishes; a guide to fresh and salt-water species, Herbert Spencer Zim and Hurst H. Shoemaker. New York, Golden Press, 1959. 160 p. (Golden nature guide). $1.00. Well-illustrated guide to 278 commoner species. Field Book of Giant Fishes, John Roxbrough Norman. New York, Putnam, 1949. 375 p. Fine cuide to whales, dolphins, and fishes over six feet long; an earlier edition was 192 called "wiant fishes, whales, and dolphins." Marine Game Fishes of the World, Francesca Raimonde La Monte. Garden City, New York, Doubleday, 1952. 190 p. $3.95. Finely illustrated identification book. Field Book of Marine Fishes of the Atlantic Coast, from Labrador to Texas; being a short description of their characteristics and habits with keys for their identification, Charles Marcus Breder, Jr., and C. W. Coates. New York, Putnam, 1948. 332 p. $5.00. Marine Game Fishes of the Pacific Coast, from Alaska to the Equator, Lionel Albert Walford. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1937. 205 p. Common Ocean Fishes of California, Phil Morgan Roedel. Sacramento, 1953. 18) p. (California Department of Fish and Game. Fish bulletin no. 75). Handbook of Hawaiian Fishes, William Alonzo Gosline and Vernon E. Brock. Honolulu, University of Hawaii Press, 1960. 372 p. $11.00. Identification book. Shark, Thomas Helm. 1961. 260 p. $.00. shark fishing, plus accounts of shark attacks and facts about sharks. New York, Dodd, Mead, Shark Attack, Victor Marcus Coppleson. Sydney, Angus and Robertson, 1958. 266 p. The Search Beneath the Sea; the story of the Coelacanth, James Leonard Brierley Smith. New York, Holt, 1956. 260 p. $3.95. How a primitive type of fish, believed extinct for 70 million years, was discovered off the coast of Madagascar. Some Publications on Game-fish and Sport Fishing, The Branch of Fish Hatcheries, U. S. Bureau of Scort Fisheries and Wildlife. Washington, 1962. ll p. (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Leaflet FL-). Free. Lists more than 100 titles. Modern Angling Bibliography; books published on angling, fisheries, fish culture, from 1881 to 1945, John Fitzgerald Hampton. London, Jenkins, 1947. 99 p. A Bibliography of Fishes, Bashford Dean. Enlarged and edited by Charles Rochester Eastman. New York, Russell and Russell, 1962. 3 vols. $50.00 22. FISHERIES AND FISHERY RESEARCH. Personal experiences - W< NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 World Sea Fisheries, Robert Morgan. New York, Pitman, 1956. 307 p. $6.95. General book on fishing regions, plankton, techniques, etc. Atlantic Ocean Fisheries, George Borgstrom and Arthur J. Heighway. London, Fishing News (Books), 1961. 336 p. Up-to-date survey of the commercial fishing situation. Fishing Resources of the United States, Lionel Albert Walford. Washington, Public Affairs Press, 1947. 13h p. $5.00. Mainly marine fisheries; many maps and diagrams showing occurrence of important food fishes. Also issued as Senate Document 51, U. S. 79th Congress, lst Session. Let's Take a Trip to a Fishery, Sarah Regal Riedman. New York. Abelard-Schuman, 1956. 127 p. $2.75. This and the next title de- scribe American fishery activities for ages 10 to 14. Harvest of the Sea, Walter Buehr. Morrow, 1955. 96 p. $2.75. New York, Fishery Science; its methods and applications, George Armyntage Rounsefell and W. H. Everhart. New York, Wiley, 1953. hh p. $9.50. Somewhat technical. Papers Presented at the International Tech- nical Conference on the Conservation of the Living Resources of the Sea, Rome, 18 April to 10 May 1955. New York, 1956. 371 p. (United Nations. Document A/Conf. 10/7; Sales no.: 1956.II.B.1). Technical. Fish as Food, George Borgstrom. New York, Academic Press, 1961-62. 2 vols. Vol.1, $24.00; vol.2, $25.00. Technical work on production, biochemistry and microbiology, nutrition, sanitation, and utilization. Principles of Fisheries Development, C. J. Bottemanne. Amsterdam, North-Holland Publishing Co., 1959. 677 p. $10.00. Detailed reference book. Fisheries Hydrography: how oceanography and meteorology can and do serve fisheries, Tlmo Hela and Taivo Laevastu. London, Fishing News (Books), 1961. 137 p. Most informative, with fine illustrations. Living Resources of the Sea; opportunity for research and expansion, Lionel Albert Walford. New York, Ronald Press, 1958. 321 p. $6.00. On techniques, equipment, and resources worth investigating. Marine Products of Commerce; their acquisition, handling, biological aspects and the science and technology of their preparation and 23. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 preservation, Donald Kiteley Tressler and dames M. Lemon. 2d ed. New York, Reinhold, 1951. 782 p. $20.00. Veritable encyclopedia on salt and other marine chemicals, algae, pearls, sponges, coral, fishes, shellfish, sea mammals. List of Films and Filmstrips on Fisheries and Related Subjects. Rev.ed. Rome, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Fisheries Division, 1960. 162 p. WHALES AND OTHER SEA MAMMALS, Follow the Whale, Ivan Terence Sanderson. Boston, Little, Brown, 1956. 23 p. $7.00. A history of whaling, with an extensive bibliography. Whales, Everhard Johannes Slijper. New York, Basic Books, 1962. 75 p. $12.50. Physi- ology, anatomy, and history of whales; detailed. New For ages All About Whales, Roy Chapman Andrews. York, Random, 1945. 148 p. $1.95. 12 to 16. Whaler's Eye, Christopher Ash. New York, Macmillan, 1962. 245 p. $7.50. Picture book about life with a modern whaling fleet in the Antarctic. The Sea-hunters; the New England whalemen during two centuries, 1635-1835, Edouard A. Stackpole. Philadelphia, Lippincott, 1953. 510 p. $7.50. Yankee Whalers in the South Seas, Addison Beecher Colvin Whipple. New York, Doubleday, 1954. 304 p. $3.95. Whales and Whaling, Paul Budker. Harrap and Co., Ltd. 18) p. Dolphins; the myth and the mammal, Antony Alpers. Boston, Houghton Mifflin, 1961. 268 p. $5.00. Man and Dolphin, John C. Lilly. Garden City, New York, Doubleday, 1961. 312 p. $.95. Paperback: New York, Pyramid Books, 1962. 191 p. $.75. On the high intelligence and ability to communicate shown by the dolphin, or porpoise. London, Porpoises and Sonar, Winthrop Niles Kellogg. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1961. 177 p. $4.50. Paperback: $1.50. How the remarkable mammal navigates. Seals, Sea Lions, and Walruses; a review of the Pinnipedia, Victor Blanchard Scheffer. 35-377 O—64—14 16. 2h. 25. 193 Stanford, California, Stanford University Press, 1958. 179 p. $5.00. Technical. The Seals, Sea Lions, and Sea Otters of the Pacific Coast, Karl Walton Kenyon and V. B. Scheffer. Washington, Government Printing Office, 1955. 3h p. (U.S. Fish and Wild- life Service. Circular 32). The Pacific Walrus; a review of current knowledge and suggested management needs, John Leo Buckley. Washington, 1958. 29 p. (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Special scientific report: wildlife, no. 1). New For Seals and Walruses, Louis Darling. York, Morrow, 1955. 63 p. $2.75. ages 10 to 1). Saga of the Grey Seal; introducing the natural history of the grey seal of the North Atlantic, Ronald Mathias Lockley. New York, Devin-Adair, 1955. 149 p. $h.00. The Hunting of the Silver Fleece; epic of the fur seal, Fredericka I. Martin. New York, Greenberg, 1946. 328 p. SEA AND SHORE BIRDS. Birds of the Ocean; a handbood for voyagers, Wilfrid Backhouse Alexander. Rev.ed. New York, Putnam, 1954. 306 p. World scope; emphasis on identification. Sea-birds; an introduction to the natural history of the sea-birds of the North Atlantic, James Fisher and R. M. Lockley. Boston, Houghton Mifflin, 1954. 320 p. $6.00. Not an identification book. Audubon Water Bird Guide; water, game, and large land birds, eastern and central North America from southern Texas to central Greenland, Richard Hooper Pough. Garden City, New York, Doubleday, 1951. 352 p. $3.95. Identification, range, habits, etc. A Gathering of Shore Birds, Henry Marion Hall. New York, Devin-Adair, 1960. 22 p. $10.00. On the natural history of 57 North American species. SEA AND SHORE LIFE. The Edge of the Sea, Rachel Louise Carson. Boston, Houghton Mifflin, 1955. 276 p. $3.75. This and the next two titles are appreciation books, written to introduce the uninitiated reader to shore life. 194 Between the Tides, Philip Street. New York, Philosophical Library, 1953. 175 p. Mild British slant. Life of the Shore and Shallow Sea, Douglas P. Wilson. 2d ed. London, Nicholson & Watson, 1951. 213 p. Mild British slant. The Sea Shore, Charles Maurice Yonge. Collins, 1949. 311 p. (New Naturalist series). Meaty explanation of shore biology and ecology; British slant. London, Natural History of Marine Animals, G. E. MacGinitie and Nettie MacGinitie. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1949. 73 p. $9.50. Easy college textbook, emphasizing coastal in- vertebrates. The Biology of the Sea-shore, Frederick William Flattely and D. L. Walton. New York, Macmillan, 1947. 336 p. College textbook. 1001 Questions Answered About the Seashore, Norman John Berrill and Jacquelyn Berrill. New York, Dodd, Mead, 1957. 305 p. $5.00. For ages 10 to 1. Sea and Shore, Clarence John Hylander. New York, Macmillan, 1950. 22 p. $3.00. All about coastal life, for children 10 to lh. Living Tide, N. J. Berrill. Mead. Boston, Dodd, Exploring the Seacoast, John Perry and Jane Greverus Perry. New York, Whittlesey, 1961. 305 p. $3.50. Various scientific activi- ties, for ages 10 to 1h. Nature Study at the Seashore; exploring with your camera, Percy A. Morris. New York, Ronald Press, 1962. 29) p. $6.00. Seashores; a guide to animals and plants along the beaches, Herbert Spencer Zim and Lester Ingle. New York, Simon & Schuster, 1955. 160 p. $1.00. Well-illustrated guide to recognizing 50 commoner forms of life. Beginner's Guide to Seashore Life, Leon Augustus Hausman. New York, Putnam, 199. 128 p. $2.00. Easy recognition book. Field Book of Seashore Life, Roy Waldo Miner. New York, Putnam, 1950. 888 p. $7.00. How to recognize the common invertebrates of the Atlantic coast, from Nova Scotia to Cape Hatteras. Life in the Shifting Dunes; a popular field guide to the natural history of Castle Neck, Ipswich, Massachusetts, with attention to 17. 26. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 the unusual ecological relationships peculiar to such an area, Laurence B. White. Boston, Museum of Science, 1960. 85 p. $1.75. The Bay; a naturalist discovers a universe of life above and below the Chesapeake, Gilbert Goer a New York, Dodd, Mead, 1951. 278 p. One Hundred HoursBeneath the Chesapeake, Gilbert C. Flingel. (National Geographic Magazine, vol. 107, no.5, May 1955, pp.681- 96.). Underwater life near Gwynn Island, Maryland. Marine Life in Texas Waters, Clyde Theodore Reed. Houston, Anson Jones Press, 1941. 88 p. (Texas Academy of Science. Publications in natural history, Non-technical series). Between Pacific Tides, Edward Flanders Ricketts and Jack Calvin. 3d ed, rev. by Joel Walker Hedgpeth. Stanford, California, Stanford University Press, 1952. 502 p. Appreciation book on Pacific coast biology and ecology. $6.95. Animals of the Seashore, Muriel Lewin Guberlet. Portland, Oregon, Binfords & Mort, 1962. In press. Describes 200 common creatures of the Pacific Northwest coasts. Common Seashore Life of the Pacific North- west, Lynwood Smith. Ed. by Vinson Brown. Healdsburg, California, Naturegraph Co., 1952. 65 p. $1.75. Introduction to Seashore Life of the San Francisco Bay Region and the Coast of Northern California, Joel Walker Hedgpeth. Berkeley, California, University of California Press, 1962. 136 p. $1.95. Common Seashore Life of Southern California, Joel Walker Hedgpeth. Healdsburg, California, Naturegraph Co., 1961. 64 p. $1.75. Seashore Treasures, Charles Howard Edmondson. Palo Alto, California, Pacific Books, 19)9. 14) p. Marine life of the Hawaiian coast. SHELLS: MOLLUSKS. Introducing Seashells; a colorful guide for the Seginning collector, Robert Tucker Abbott. New York, Van Nostrand, 1955. 70 p. $2.50. Fine. This and the next two titles tell how to collect and appreciate shells; they are not identification books. Sea Treasure; a guide to shell collecting, Kathleen Yerger Johnstone. Boston, Houghton Mifflin, 1957. 242 p. $.00. Fine. 27. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Shell Collector's Handbook, Alpheus Hyatt Verrill. New York, Putnam, 1950. 228 p. $5.00 Sea Shells of the World; a guide to the better-known species, Robert Tucker Abbott, and Herbert S. Zim. New York, Golden Press, 1962. 160 p. $3.50. This and the next six titles are mainly identification books. The Shell Book; a popular guide to a know- ledge of the families of living mollusks, and an aid to the identification of shells native and foreign, Julia Ellen Rogers. Rev.ed. Boston, C. T. Branford, 1951. $6.50. American Seashells, Robert Tucker Abbott. New York, Van Nostrand, 1954. 5Shl p. Detailed and definitive. How to Know the American Marine Shells, Robert Tucker Abbott. New York, New American Library, 1961. 222 p. (Signet Key book, KT375). $.75. A Field Guide to the Shells of our Atlantic and Gulf Coasts, Percy A. Morris. Rev.ed. Boston, Houghton Mifflin, 1951. 220 p. (Peterson field guide series). $.50. Shells of the New York City area; a handbook of the land, fresh water and marine mollusks ranging from Cape Cod to Cape May, Morris K. Jacobson and William K. Emerson. New York, Argonaut Books, distributed by Citadel Press, 1961. 12 p. $h.00. A Field Guide to the Shells of the Pacific Coast and Hawaii, Percy A. Morris. Boston, Houghton Mifflin, 1952. 220 p. (Peterson field guide series). $4.50. Mollusks; an introduction to their forms and functions, John Edward Morton. New York, Harper, 1960. 232 p. $1.0. Oysters, Charles Maurice Yonge. London, Collins, 1960. 209 p. (The new naturalist series). Charming book on the natural history of the delectible bivalve. EDUCATION AND CAREERS IN OCEANOGRAPHY. University Curricula in Oceanography, Academic Year 1962-63, Washington, 1962. 11 p. (U.S. Interagency Committee on Oceanography. ICO pamphlet, no.6). OP. Education and Recruitment of Oceanographers in the United States; . A report by the Committee on Education and Recruitment, the American Society of Limnology and Oceano- 503 p. $12.50. 18. 28. 195 graphy, Inco.; Alfred C. Redfield. Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1960. 23 p. (Supplement to Limnology and Oceanography. vol.6). Your Future in Oceanography, with the U.S. Navy Hydrographic Office and other Federal establishments. Rev.ed. Washington, U.S. Civil Service Commission, 1961. 22 p. There's Adventure in Marine Science, Julian May. New York, Hawthorn Press, 1959. 160 p. $2.95. Career fiction, for ages 10 to 1. Steady as You Go; Jack Powell's adventures with the U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey, Robert F. A. Studds. New York, Dodd, Mead, 1956. 306 p. Career fiction for boys 12 to 15, demonstrating jobs with the Coast and Geodetic Survey. High, Wide, and Deep: science and adventure with the Coast and Geodetic Survey, John Joseph Floherty. Philadelphia, Lippincott, 1952. 154 p. $2.75. Careers described for boys 12 to 16. Deep Sea, High Mountain, Elliott B. Roberts. Boston, Little, Brown, 1961. 275 p. $3.75. True adventures of Coast and Geodetic Survey men; fine career information for boys 12 to 16. DICTIONARIES. Tide and Current Glossary, Paul Schureman. Rev.ed. Washington. Government Printing Office, 1949. Op. (U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey. Special publication no.228). Sold by Government Printing Office for $.15. Waves, Tides, Currents, and Beaches; glossary of terms and list of standard symbols, Robert L. Wiegel. New York, Council on Wave Research, The Engineering Foundation, 1953. 113 p. Glossary of Oceanographic Terms. Washington. 1960. 12p. (U.S. Navy Hydrographic Office. Special Publication, SP-35. Navigation dictionary. Washington, 1956. 253 p. (U.S. Navy Hydrographic Office. H, O. Publication, no.220). Sold by the Hydrographic Office, for $2.00. A Dictionary of Nautical Terms, A. G. Course. London, Arco Publications, 1962. 216 p. A Functional Glossary of Ice Terminology. Washington, 1952. 88 p. (U.S. Navy Hydro- graphic Office. H. 0. Publication, no.609). 196 29. 30. Sold by the Hydrographic Office, for $.80. Deals mainly with sea ice. Standard Encyclopedia of the World's Oceans and Islands, Anthony Huxley. New York, Putnam, 1962. 383 p. $10.95. Gazetteer of over 2000 names of seas, island, bays, straits, capes and other related topographic features. DIRECTORIES. International and National Organizations of Oceanographic Activities, Richard C. Vetter. Washington. National Academy of Sciences-- National Research Council, Committee on Oceanography, 1959. 7 p. O.p. An International Directory of Oceanographers, Kenneth Orris Emery and Mary Sears. 3d ed. Washington, National Academy of Sciences-- National Research Council, Committee on Oceanography, 1960. 177 p. O.p. International Aspects of Oceanography; oceanographic data and provisions for oceanographic research, Thomas Wayland Vaughan. Washington, National Academy of Sciences, 1937. 225 p. Dated, but con- tains much historical information of interest. Directory of the Public Acquaria of the World, Spencer Wilkie Tinker and Marian Omura. Preliminary ed. Honolulu, Waikiki Acquarium, University of Hawaii, 1962. 28 p. Directory of Hydrobiological Laboratories and Personnel in North American, Robert W. Hiatt. Honolulu, University of Hawaii Press, 1954. 32) p. $3.75. World Directory of Marine Laboratories, The American Institute of Biological Sciences. New York, Reinhold, 1963. In press. HISTORY OF OCEANOGRAPHY. A Study of the Oceans, James Johnstone. 2d ed. New York, Longmans, 1926. 215 p. Mainly a concise history of oceanography. Founders of Oceanography and Their Work; an introduction to the science of the sea, William Abbott Herdman. New York, Longmans, 1923. 340 p. The first half of this book, pages 1 to 14), is a history of oceanogra- phy, as told in the lives of some sreat researchers. Searchers of the Sea; pioneers in oceanogra- phy, Charles Michael Daugherty. New York, Viking, 1961. 160 p. $3.00. Biographical 19. 31. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 sketches of 15 prominent oceanographers, for ages 10 to 15. The Coast and Geodetic Survey, 1807-1957; 150 years of history, Aaron Joseph Wraight and E. B. Roberts. Washington, Government Printing Office, 1957. 90 p. $.35. Charting our Sea and Air Lanes. Stuart E. Jones. (National Geographic Magazine, vol. 111, no.2, Feb. 1957, pp. 188-209). Sketch of the history of the Coast and Geodetic Survey. Oceanography, 1960 to 1970: Part 11 - A History of Oceanography: a brief account of the development of oceanography in the United States. Washington, National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council, Committee on Oceanography, 1962. 28 p. Free. Seas, Maps, and Men; an atlas-history of man's exploration of the oceans, George Edward Raven Deacon. Garden City, New York, Doubleday, 1962. 297 p. $9.95. Tells the story of some of the great ocean exploring expeditions, then describes some of the great discoveries in marine biology, sub- marine archaeology, and physical and geological oceanography. BIOGRAPHIES OF OCEANOGRAPHERS. Yankee Stargazer; the life of Nathaniel Bowditch, Robert Elton Berry. New York, Whittlesey, 1941. 23h p. Bowditch, 1773- 1838, made the art of navigation truly scientific. Navigator; the story of Nathaniel Bowditch, Alfred Boller Stanford. New York, Morrow, 1927. 308 p. Fictionized biography. Sextant and Sails; the story of Nathaniel Bowditch, Robert Elton Berry. New York, Dodd, Mead, 1943. 231 p. For ages 12 to 16. Down to the Sea; a young people's life of Nathaniel Bowditch, the great American navigator, Louise Hall Tharp. New York, McBride, 1942. 242 p. For ages 12 to 16. Carry on, Mr. Bowditch, Jean Lee Latham. Boston, Houghton Mifflin. 1955. 251 p. $3.25. A fine fictionized biography. for ages 10 to 1h. Matthew Fontaine Maury: the pathfinder of the seas, Charles Lee Latham. Annapolis, United States Naval Institute, 1927. 264 p. Scholarly 1ifé of Maury, 1806-1873, founder of oceanography, early head of the Ba NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 197 Hydrographic Office of the Navy Department, and the Admiral Rickover of his time. Matthew Fontaine Maury; scientist of the gea, Frances leigh Williams. New Bruns- Wick, New Jersey, Ratgers University Press, 1963. $10.00. In press. Matthew Fentaine Maury and Joseph Henry; seiextists of the Civil War, Patricia James. 308 p. $5.95. Easy. Matthew Fontaine Maury; trail maker of the sea, Hildegarde Hawthorne. New York, Longmans, 1943. 226 p. Fictionized biography, easy. Trail Blazer of the Seas, Jean Lee Latham. Boston, Houghton Mifflin, 1956. 25 p. $2.75. Fine fictionized biography of Maury, from birth to about 1858, for ages 10 to 14. The Chequered Career of Ferdinand Rudolph Hassler, first Superintendent of the United States Coast Survey; a chapter in the history of science in America, Florian Cajori. Boston, Christopher, 1929. 25 p. Swiss-born Hassler, 1770-183, had his troubles with a penn-pinching Congress. Alexander Dallas Bache; scientist and educator, 1806-1867, Merle Middleton Odgers. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press, 197. 223 p. $2.75. Bache was Director af the Coast Survey from 183 to 1867. Read Letters and Recollections of Alexander Agassiz, with a sketch of his life and work, George Russell Agagsiz. Boston, Houghton Mifflin, 1913. 5) p. Agassiz, 1835-1910, son of Louis Agassiz, was a famed marine biologist. The Hidden Coasts; a biography of Admiral Charles Wilkes, Daniel MacIntyre Henderson. New York, Sloane, 1953. 306 p. $5.00. Scholarly life of Admiral Wilkes, 1798- 1877, of Civil War fame, who led an im- portant charting and scientific expedition to the Antarctic and Pacific Oceans. OCEANOGRAPHIC EXPEDITIONS, Titian Ramsay Peale, 1799-1885, and his Journals of the Wilkes Expedition, Jessie Poesch. Philadelphia, 1961. 21) p. (American Philosophical Society. Memoir 52), $6.50. Fine account by the scientific illustrator who accompanied Wilkes. Pd Yankee Surveyors in the Shogun's Seas; re- cords of the United States Surveying Expe- dition to the North Pacifie Ocean, 1853- 1856, Allan Burnett Cole. Princeton, New Jersey, Prineeton University Press, 19h7. 165 p. $2.50. The Voyage of the Challenger, Herbert S. Bailey, Jr. (Seientific Reet vol.188, no.5, May 1953, pp.88-9)). The numerous old publications of this famous expedition are not listed here. The Last Cruise of the Carnegie, John Harland Paul. Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins, 1932. 331 p. The Carnegie was lost by fire in 1929. This and the next five titles deal with expeditions which specialized in sea-bottom geology and physi- cal oceanography. Westward Ho with the Albatross, Hans Pettersson. New York, Dutton, 1953. 218 p. $4.00. About an important Swedish voyage of 197-198. Exploring the Deep Pacific, Helen Raitt. New York, Norton, 1956. 288 p. $3.75. About the Scripps Institute Capricorn ex- pedition of 1952-1953. Challenger; the life of a survey ship, George Stephen Ritchie. New York, Abelard- Schuman, 1958. 270 p. $5.00. Adventures of a new Challenger, 1931-1953, mapping the coast of Africa and studying the sea bottom. Oceanographic Cruise Report, U.S.C.&G.S. Ship Explorer--1960, Seattle, Washington, to Norfolk, Virginia, February 2--April 27, 1960. Washington, Government Printing Office, 1962. 162 p. $3.00. Life on an Ice Floe, Ivan Papanin. New York, Messner, 1939. 300 p. Enthusiastic account of nine months that four Russian scientists spent drifting on an Arctic Ocean ice island, making oceanographic observations. The Galathea Deep Sea Expedition, 1950- 1952, Anton Frederick Bruun. New York, Macmillan, 1956. 296 p. $8.00. Nota daily account of life aboard ship, but a fine picture of research procedures. This and the remaining titles in this section deal mainly with marine biology. Round the World With Galathea, Hakon Mielche. London, Hodge, 1953. p. Fir daily account of life aboard ship. The Shoals of Capricorn, Francis Downes Ommanney. New York, Harcourt, 1952. 322 p. 198 33. Charming journal by a marine biologist working among the reefs of Mauritius and the Seychelles. The Voyage of the Petula, Frank Evans. London, Hall, 1957. 189 p. Vivid picture of marine biology activities aboard a small research vessel, in the Atlantic. Beyond the Pack Ice, Peter Digby. London, Jenkins, 1954. 186 p. How Mr. and Mrs. Digby studied plankton along the coasts of Greenland. Kon-Tiki, Thor Heyerdahl. Chicago. Rand McNally, 1950. 304 p. $5.00. Paperback: New York, Permabook, 1960. 20 p. $.35. Justly famous book about a voyage on a raft, attempting to demonstrate that the South Pacific Islands were settled by colonizers from South America; truly captures the feel of tropic seas! Kon-Tik43. Thor Heyerdahl; a special edition for young people. Chicago, Rand McNally, 1960. 165 p. $4.95. For ages 10 to 1h, loaded with photographs and maps. Sea of Cortez; a leisurely journal of travel and research. John Steinbeck and Edward 3h. Flanders Rickets. New York, Viking, 191. 598 p. The story of a collecting voyage to the Gulf of California, told as only Steinbeck can tell it. The Log from the Sea of Cortez; the narrative portion of the Sea of Cortez, John Steinbeck and Edward Flanders Ricketts. New York. Viking, 1951. 282 p. $4.00. Paperback: Viking, 1962. 282 p. $1.45. Includes a short biography of marine biologist Ed Ricketts, by his friend Steinbeck. New How Book of Bays, Charles William Beebe. York, Harcourt Brace, 1942. 302 pv. . Beebe investigated marine life along the Central American coast. Other Beebe books on coast and reet' life include "The Arcturus adventure," "Nonsuch, land of water." "Zaca venture," and "Beneath tropic seas." GENERAL MAPS OF THE OCEANS (excluding coast and sailing charts, for which see section 3). Physiographic Diagram, Atlantic Ocean. . ., Bruce C. Heezen and Marie Tharr. New York, Geological Society of America, 1957-61. Sheet 1 (1957. $1.50) covers the North Atlantic between latitudes 17 degrees and 50 degrees North, scale about 1:5.0C0,000. Sheet 2 (1961. $2.00) covers the remainder of the Atlantic and the west coast of South America, scale about 1:10,000,000. 21. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Atlantic Ocean, scale 1:20,000,000. Washing- ton, National Geographic Society. 1955. $1.00. Colored bathymetric map, Mercator projection. Pacific Ocean, scale 1:36,432,000. ‘Washins- ton, National Geographic Society. 1962. (Atlas plate 61). $.50. Colored bathymetric map, Mercator projection. The World, scale 1:12.233,000. Washington, 1961. (U.S. Navy Hydrographic Office, Chart no. 15,254). $12.00. A large, 12-sheet colored bathymetric map, Mercator projection. with the sea-bottom relief shown in con- siderable detail. Chart of the World, scale 1:39.000.C00. Washington, 1961. (U.S. Navy Hydrographic Office. Chart no. 1262A. 10th ed.). $.70. Colored bathymetric map, Mercator projection. Ice Atlas of the Northern Hemisphere. Washington, 1946. 106 p. (U.S. Hydrographic Office, Publication no. 550). Sold by the Hydrographic Office for $8.00. Shows distribution of sea ice. FILMS AND FILM STRIPS. The Bahamas, where limestones grow today. 1952. 4l mins., sound, color. Humble Oil Co., Public Relations and Advertising Department. F. 0. Box 2180, Houston 1. Texas. Technical film on how modern lime- stones are formed. Beach and Sea Animals. 1957. 11 mins.. sound. black & white or color. Encycloredia Britannica Films, 1150 Wilmette Ave., Wilmette, Illinois. Beautiful film on Atlantic coast life, suitable for almost any age. Challenge of the Oceans. 1960, 29 mins.. sound. black & white or color. McGraw-Hill Text-Films, 330 West 42nd Street, New York 3€, New York. Sponsored by the National Research Council. On oceanographic instru- ments and methods of study, with some re- sults, suitable for ages 12 up. Island Adventure. 1956. 28 mins., sound. color. Texaco Company. Public Relations Division. 135 East 42nd Street, New York 17. New York. On the construction and equipping of an oil drilling island on the California coast. suitable for ages 15 up. Island Oddities. 1952 26 mins., sound. color. Esso Standard Oil. Marketing Decart- ment, Hutchinson River Parkway, =elham. New York. Beautiful film on coastal life in the Bahama Islands, suitable for almost any age. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Ocean Tides--Bay of Fundy. 1956, 15 mins., sound, color. Encyclopedia Britannica Films, 1150 Wilmette Ave., Wilmette, Illinois. Good account of the features of huge tides, suitable for ages 12 up. Offshore Venture. 1958, 1) mins., sound, color. Humble Oil Co., Public Relations and Advertising Department, P.O. Box 2180, Houston 1, Texas. On finding and producing offshore oil, suitable for ages 15 up. Problem at Port Washington. 1951, 10 mins., sound, black & white. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Technical Liason Division. Chief of Engineers, Department of the Army. Washington 25, D.C. How the Corps of Engineers tests models of breakwaters at Port Washington, Wisconsin; suitable for ages 12 up. Project Mohole, report no.1. 1959. 19 mins., sound, color. Educational Testing Service, 20 Nassau Street, Princeton, New Jersey. Middling film about the Mohole, of some interest to ages 1 up. Recent Carbonate Deposits of the Florida Keys. 1947, 38 mins., sound, color. Magnolia Petroleum Co., c/o Humble Oil Co., Public Relations and Advertising Department, P.O. Box 2180, Houston 1, Texas. Rendezvous in the Reef. 1951. 28 min.. sound, color. Esso Standard Oil, Marketing Department, Hutchinson River Parkway. Pelham. New York. Fine submarine photography con- cerning fish life in the Bahamas. Station 307. 1954. 19 mins., sound, black & white. Radiant Films, 247 West 2nd Street, New York 36, New York. "The Jacques Cousteau oceanographic team explores the bottom of the Persian Gulf at a station of a large submarine geological survey for British Petroleum Co.; suitable for ages 15 up. Tides and Currents, 18 mins., sound, black & white. U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey. Motion Picture Service, Washington 25, D.C. On the causes, types, and measurement of tides and currents; suitable for ages 15 up. What's Under the Ocean. 1960, 13 mins., sound, black & white or color. Film Associates of California, 1101) Santa Monica Blvd., Los Angeles 25, California. Briefly describes the work of skin divers, bathy- scaphs, and oceanic research vessels; suitable for ages 10 to 16. Blueprint for Discovery--Probing for the 22. 35. 199 Earth's Deepest Secrets. 1962, 26 or 0 mins., sound, color. Victor J. Jurgens Motion Picuure Productions, Old Military Road, Lake Placid, New York. Official film report of Project Mohole, produced for the National Science Foundation; suitable for ages 1) up. Mighty Currents of the Sea, LIFE filmstrip, "new portrait of our planet" series. €7 frames, color. with teaching guide. LIFE Filmstrips, Time & Life Building, Rockefeller Center, New York 20, New York. Deep Frontier; an introduction to oceanography. Film strip and record, 18 mins., 82 frames, color. U.S. Department of Interior. Bureau of Commercial Fisheries. BIBLIOGRAPHIES ON OCEANOGRAPHY AND RELATED SUBJECTS. A Reader's Guide to Oceanography, Jan Hahn. Woods Hole, Massachusetts, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 1961. 10 p. Free. A Preliminary Bibliography of Books on the Seashore, Oceanography, and Related Subjects, Joel Walker Hedgpeth. La Jolla, California, 1953. €9 p. (Scripps Institution of Oceanography. SIO Reference 53-13). tated listing of 550 titles. Anno- Books of the Sea; an introduction to nautical literature, Charles Lee Lewis. Annapolis, United States Naval Institute, 1943. 318 p. O.p. Pacific Island Bibliography. Floyd M. Cammack and Shiro Sato. New York. Scarecrow Press, 1962. 21 p. $10.00. Island Bibliographies: Micronesian botany. land environment and ecology of coral atolls, vegetation of tropical Pacific islands, Marie-Helen Sachet and F. Raymond Fosberg. Comp. under the auspices of the Pacific Science Board. Washington 1955. 577 p. (National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council. Publication 335). $€.00. Annotated Bibliography of Geologic and Soils Literature of Western North Pacific Islands, prepared under the direction of the Chief of Engineers, U.S. Army, by the Intelligence Division. Office of the Engineer, Head- quarters, U.S. Army Forces, Far East, and Eighth U.S. Army, with personnel of the U.S. Geological Survey. N.p.. 1956. 88 p. A Bibliography of Bibliographies of the South Pacific, Ida Leeson. Published under the auspices of the South Pacific Commission. 200 36. New York, Oxford University Press, 195). 61 p. $1.95. A Bibliographical Sourcebook of Compressed Air Diving and Submarine Medicine, Ebbe Curtis Hoff and Leon Jack Greenbaum. Washington, Research Division, Project X-,27, Bureau of Medicine and Surgery, Navy Department, 198-195). 2 vols. (NAVMED 1911; NAVMED P-5033). Oceanography of the North Pacific Ocean, Bering Sea and Bering Strait; a contribution toward a bibliography. Mary C. Grier. Seattle, University of Washington Press, 1941. 314 p. $h.00. References on the Physical Oceanography of the Western Pacific Ocean, Mary C. Grier. Washington, 1946. 17), p. (U.S. Navy Hydrographic Office. H. 0. Publication, no. 238). $2.)0. PERIODICALS ON OCEANOGRAPHY AND RELATED SUBJECTS. Lack of space prevents listing more than a few periodical titles. Shore and Beach, published monthly by the American Shore and Beach Preservation Association, Washington, D.C. Contains articles on coastal geology, geography. and engineering. Offshore, published monthly by International Trade Publications, Conroe, Texas. Con- cerned mainly with petroleum. Oceanus, published quarterly by the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts. Contains nontechnical articles on oceanography and on Institute activities. Sea Frontiers, published monthly by the International Oceanographic Foundation, Miami, Florida. The column. "Science of the sea in books," reviews both popular and technical books dealing with the sea. Con- tains nontechnical articles. Deep-sea Research, published quarterly by Pergamon Press, London, England. Technical. Journal of Marine Research, published irregularly by the Sears Foundation for Marine Research, Bingham Oceanographic Laboratory, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut. Technical. Journal of the Marine Bi.:logical Association of the United Kingdom, published quarterly 23. \ NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 by the Association, Plymouth. England. Technical. Limnology and Oceanography, published quarterly by the American Society of Limnology and Oceanography, Lawrence, Kansas. Technical. Atoll Research Bulletin, published irregularly by the Pacific Science Board of the National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council. Washington, D.C. Devoted to the geology, geography, natural history. and anthropology of the Pacific Islands; mostly technical. Pacific Sciences; a Quarterly Devoted to the Biological and Physical Sciences of the Pacific Region, published by the University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu, Hawaii. Scientific American, published monthly by the Scientific American Publishing Co., New York, New York. This general, nontechnical scien- tific journal contains many fine articles on oceanography; some of the best, 197-1962, are listed in this bibliography. Skin Diver Magazine, published by Skin Diver Publications, Lynwood, California. Popular journal for the skin or scuba-diving hobbyist. Underseas Technology. published monthly by the Sheffield Publishing Co., Washington, D.C. Ocean Science News, published 36 times per year by the Nautilus Press, Washington, D.C. A news letter on oceanographic activities. APPENDIX 3 UNIVERSITY CURRICULA IN OCEANOGRAPHY SUBMITTED BY HON. JAMES H. WAKELIN, JR., ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE NAVY 201 UNIVERSITY CURRICULA IN OCEANOGRAPHY ACADEMIC YEAR 1963—64 INTERAGENCY COMMITTEE ON OCEANOGRAPHY. of the FEDERAL COUNCIL FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY United States of America ICO Pamphlet No. 14 June 1963 203 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 204 FEDERAL COUNCIL FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY JEROME B. WIESNER, Chairman Director Office of Science and Technology HAROLD BROWN Director of Defense Research and Engineering Department of Defense J. HERBERT HOLLOMON Assistant Secretary for Science and Technology Department of Commerce BOISFEUILLET JONES Special Assistant to the Secretary for Health and Medical Affairs Department of Health, Education arid Wetfare JOHN C. CALHOUN Science Adviser to the Secretary Department of the Interior RAGNAR ROLLEFSON Director, Office of International Scientific Affairs (Observer) Department of State GLENN T, SEABORG Chairman Atomic Energy Commission ALAN T. WATERMAN Director National Science Foundation JAMES E. WEBB Administrator National Aeronautics and Space Administration WILLARD COCHRANE Director, Agricultural Economics Department of Agriculture ELMER B, STAATS Deputy Director Bureau of the Budget (Observer) N. E. HALABY Administrator Federal Aviation Agency (Observer) EDWARD WENK, JR. Technical Assistant to the Director Office of Science and Technology (Executive Secretary) INTERAGENCY COMMITTEE ON OCEANOGRAPHY JAMES H. WAKELIN, JR., Chairman Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Research and Development) RADM. H. ARNOLD KARO U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Department of Commerce DONALD L. McKERNAN Bureau of Commercial Fisheries Department of Interior RADM. R. D. SCHMIDTMAN U.S. Coast Guard Department of the Treasury RAGNAR ROLLEFSON Office of International Scientific Affairs Department of State (Observer) ATHELSTAN F. SPILHAUS Committee on Oceanography National Academy of Sciences (Observer) HARVE J. CARLSON National Science Foundation HARRY G. HANSON Public Health Service Department of Health, Education and Welfare JOHN N. WOLFE Atomic Energy Commission I. E, WALLEN Museum of Natural History Smithsonian Institution ENOCH L. DILLON Bureau of the Budget (Observer) ROBERT B, ABEL Office of Naval Research Department of the Navy (Secretary) NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 205 UNIVERSITY CURRICULA IN OCEANOGRAPHY ACADEMIC YEAR 1963-64 Interagency Committee on Oceanography of the Federal Council for Science and Technology Printed by the U. S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE Public Health Service ICO Pamphlet No. 14 June 1963 206 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 FOREWORD The Interagency Committee on Oceanography, under the direc- tion of the Federal Council for Science and Technology, is respon- sible for developing annually a National Oceanographic Program to coordinate the efforts of all government agencies in meeting the long-range goals of the United States in marine science, In review- ing the vastly expanded oceanographic programs of the next few years, the Interagency Committee has become concerned with the necessity for planning to insure that the supply of trained manpower will be adequate to accomplish the work proposed. The recommendations of the ICO and its Panel on Manpower and Training for augmenting the number of scientists being trained for oceanography are embodied in ICO Pamphlet Number Eight, soon to be released, This catalog, University Curricula in Oceanography, is designed to supplement ICO Pamphlet Number Eight by making avail- able information about existing training in the marine sciences, It is hoped that the catalog will be an aid in promoting full use of existing opportunities and facilities. The ICO is deeply grateful for the cooperation of the many faculty members of listed institutions who generously supplied the information in this report. ii NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 207 TABLE OF CONTENTS ROREWORD asieieve levers tateve ie vovevoilarere te lovereveilovaite te tele tei foteretatelototererete late ovo onroterolersioreleteie 6 ii TN TRO MU Ciel ONeretstetercteleleisioteleierelotereleteleleleleleielelaterelc/clelelele clelelcielciolelelcveleiers|eieisisiere 1 LISTINGS OF UNIVERSITY CURRICULA: Agricultural and Mechanical College of TexaS..ssccsescesescsees 7 Graduate School, U.S. Department of Agriculture.....csescesseee 13 SU MAMe ESA VO eA LAS Ket rain aistsia) clcleiulxini/sfalsiciaielaaisialalisl oivie)eictalaletelsia aj leiaiaisialO ERE MANE TCA MUNA VeT SCY Zarelalel olelelelela/sielototetelstsl el cveielalaletstelelelofelsieveleleisislelen i ty/ Gali: forniasinstitute Of sechnolopy eCmAU HAV Cal SANG Vaetet tere oleleleleleloieratelctelalereictererelel ciel eieie olelelsiererehclalctatersbeleiereioi oo PGE SreeteS WaEhyorSss75 56 noodbosndu0dododo0DOb0DdDSHDOGDObbOO Se emer satey Or NGCORP AAG oie lslelcls cleisiosie/sls'eleieie(einielaie’ale)sicsie)siesieleia)sicreroiais 140 leet ATAU ANE 125 IGE Via atrwilnllainial alate ela) el alic\alelelic/ale) aiejats’ eisjeie/ alelejaisisehels)ssie)e\ni amie Rireeser Sete VO te SEL AW Tt i lahetaiicl nin /aelalelatn]nloleiel eliala/aiejaliols! aia /a)sletalals/alerels\o/e(elaieiaga We Ta SHstsyanO tn OMS COMsletavelstsiclalelelolsistelalolelelsieveleislelslelatarclclel sisialalelslelatalsien OO emp pee Sca Cem COL COE) oy, asic os\s sine inie uiclisielnl(e/sie/a ms) s\elelsfolslelelie aletslalals sist D>, Peas MORIN SUNT VETS ACY: 6 si c)s\elsiels «0c slaleis\ seis sisialsie's icles) viels| eis cis'eisies D9 RouaslandeocacemUNi Versi Cyatarelalelsleleleletelel stelelslolelere eletelelsie sielelslelsielelalere OS Massachusetts Institute of Technology. ..cccccccvcsccccsecsccscses 04 TEE VERSH@”? cir Wetilo sas oocogonpddeoncoUDOOOODDoOOdDDOGonOOnGOS (és) Umar Ore MIRE poobGbGopoDDDODDODOODOGGODOOONDOCGDDGO0DD HE EeSee aval POSteraduate SCNOOMs @ sists’ cls's|s eleie/sleelels cle eiaisic.s\slele sivieisien 19 EWM OTK UNG VETS TCV olaielai b/e)/slcisiein ei eleielelsieleieicls\elaiele/clsielelelsic/e)slelcrelsiciererere Oe State University of New York Maritime College.....sccsossceseee 99° Pramersnty sof NOLtH iCATOUIT als «\ Oreronwinsel cuce OLE MaTiINe Bl Ol OPV eisielelstchale eierelioielsielelclenclle\lelelelsleielsj elena 4 SREP CMM SEA Les UNAVE TS ACY cr alelalaieisiniele mintelnielelshe (el oles! sin isialshotsl sls) elie «1e/e/sle) 15.0 Bnavenstey Ot them bacdde Cortcrelctsiie a cvelcla cieleicisioisieisieleieisie alelatelalsioisiels ier LO pennsylvania state UNPVETS1 CY is\s oe welc icc eaie cic vle sls\sisisre's e)cjelsivicre ee LOO Pomona COULE GE). ./ac)asloleieini iol el efele) sin) olsi ote \oleilelbisilelslelsl sie(sle\s oie oie e/aisiele see's LO UnaVex-Sa bye Here re OMRAC Obsaterelelelelelobefoletelelelelolalsiclelelersisieicverelelsielelsyererererl lod Rensselaer PO lyce chit Cenc HEUCE elutlalsisialalsialslolelelel siclelsl eleia)slere/aleliaiele a 2 UnAVeTS tty HOt aRROdeamSd aNCamiars lee oleelelvtelelctonaie sie’ eisierele «sles siaisie's sinieil lio *San Diego State College. (oo isc ccc ce clecccvcssccesscccccsccccecll/ Serapps) institutaon of Oceanography. coc visissjacje sine clescic cis ciele ee aie Lito Unaviersmty OL Southern Galatormias ceteueiela cele cicieleiele eleleleisiereiorererereia (20 PO CAMEO UML Cn StsCVareterereylerelcverer crete eielololelallelsrovelerevelerere elerelel orelerevellckererelereve oO liniviensiteyao tame Xa Siopstareie cleisieiol slaielelersisislevelaiclelclalerendleisasicteiereneisiekerelareieren lo Virointasinst1tuce .Ot) Marane iS CLENCE sisinicicinereistatelvlclelsre sielsieleleicisiererenl ol? iii 208 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Walla Wall lam Golelieicerrrrerelereiehoheielotalalclskelelelalclelelelolelolelclclelelcteletelenereleterelenst lc xUMaversaty, OL WaShamngt OMlersicycleieaie clei aiein/el sie) elelels)mialelclclalelstetereteteleteteteteph cc University, OF Wi SCONSHM\sceleleieeislelelelelelsleleletelc\elolelelelsichelelsietetetelsienetetsteter Con XNA MUNEAVE TS LiCYsetelehehelelelelolelslelelelelelotekslelshelelohelelelelolelelelokeleleheletetclelelslstetetetert o> ALPHABETICAL FACULTY DDS esi) as eo iis! eeres 0:00) o:6:eere 0: eveevele) ole lovelelerctenctonoletetenenebenen icon’ *Because no revisions were furnished the ICO staff before the publi- cation deadline, this entry is reprinted from the 1962-63 edition of University Curricula in Oceanography. iv NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 209 INTRODUCTION This catalog is a compilation of courses offered in the marine sciences at American colleges and universities. In addition to providing information to students, its purpose is to increase the exchange of infor- mation among the schools, and between them and employers of oceanographic manpower. The term "oceanography" is used in this publication in its broadest sense, meaning the application of science to the study of the sea. Courses described are not restricted to those designated ''oceanography" by the institutions offering them, but include all courses dealing with study of the marine environment. Only those schools which grant a degree specifically in the field of marine sciences are listed as granting degrees under the section entitled "Degrees Offered" under each school entry. However, nearly all the insti- tutions apply listed course work for credit towards an advanced degree. Some universities consider it most beneficial for a scientist to be trained to the doctorate level in one of the classical disciplines of science before he concentrates his attention entirely upon the marine environment. The omission in this catalog of degrees in fields other than specifically marine science does not in any way imply that the Interagency Committee on Ocean- ography considers the system of training which culminates in a degree in "oceanography" superior to that which channels training through traditional scientific disciplines. The following information is included for each listed institution. 1. A brief description of programs and facilities at each institution. 2. The name of the department in which listed courses are taught. 3. The name, academic rank, and highest degree held by all faculty members teaching courses listed or supervising student research. 4, Degrees offered in oceanography or related marine science. 5. A list of courses, including course number, title, teacher, and description. 6. The person to be contacted for further information, In addition to the individual listings for each institution, an alphabetical listing of all faculty members is appended. 35-377 O—64——15 210 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Many students and faculty advisors have written the Committee inquiring about the preparation necessary for entry into the field of oceanography. It should be noted that nearly all institutions award only graduate degrees in marine science, and batehelor's degree is requisite for beginning students in this field. The following excerpt from the bulletin of the University of Miami Institute of Marine Science sets forth typical requirements for undergraduate preparation. (‘Oceanography'' is used in its narrow sense at Miami, including only physical and chemical oceanography and omitting biological and geo- logical oceanography, which are called Marine Biology, Marine Geology, and Fisheries). UNDERGRADUATE CURRICULA The department receives many inquiries concerning proper under- graduate preparation for entrance to its graduate program. To guide students, several undergraduate programs are suggested for preparation in Fisheries, Marine Biology, Oceanography, and Marine Geology. Other disciplines are not considered since each university has its own set of requirements designed to give students broad exposure to the liberal arts. Students interested in pursuing marine science should select an undergraduate major in one of the basic scientific disciplines. The undergraduate college should be selected on the basis of curriculum and staff strength in that major. In the biological sciences Zoology is much preferred to Botany as an undergraduate major but, hopefully zoology students will include basic botany courses in their curriculum, Within the general scope of the program suggested below, prospective marine biology students most interested in experimental biology should take care to be well prepared in chemistry, biochemistry, and mathematics, Stu- dents interested in systematics, anatomy, etc., should strengthen their zoology, genetics and related course program. Prospective marine geologists should acquire strong backgrounds in Mathematics, Chemistry and Physics. The student should at the same time be careful to satisfy the graduation requirements of his own University. Students should consult their Department for assistance on individual programs. University College science caurses that lack laboratories are not acceptable substitutes for the basic science courses. Students may wish to spend one summer at a marine laboratory in order to have a more firm basis for decision concerning their future career in marine science. In the suggested curricula on the following pages, courses are designated as "required'’ (those believed to be essential) and "suggested" (those which should be taken if the student's program can include them). No NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 211 A student may be admitted to graduate standing in this department without having had some of the required courses, but he will ordinarily not be allowed to take a master's degree until he has completed all of them, either before or after admission to the Graduate School. Courses listed as "suggested" should be taken whenever the student's program permits, but he will ordinarily not be obliged to take them in order to obtain the master's degree. He may, however, be asked to take some of the "suggested" courses if he continues for the Ph.D. degree. Exceptions to these requirements may be made at the discretion of the department and the student's advisory committee. The reading knowledge of two languages is required of graduate students before the Ph.D. degree can be achieved, Good undergraduate preparation in at least one language is strongly urged. Spanish ordinarily is not an acceptable substitute for French or German or Russian. Undergraduate courses taken by a graduate student do not contribute credits toward his advanced degree at the University of Miami. The courses designated as "required" are marked with an asterisk, MARINE BIOLOGY Zoology Chemistry *Introductory or General Zoology *Principles of Chemistry *Invertebrate Zoology (Inorganic) *Comparative Vertebrate Anatomy or Vertebrate *Qualitative Analysis Organic Chemistry Zoology Physical Chemistry *Embryology Quantitative Analysis *Physiology Biochemistry Parasitelogy Histology Mathematics Genetics *Algebra Microscopy and Miecrotechnique *Trigonomet ry Ichthyology Botany *General (8 hours) Phycology Physics *General Physics Foreign Language French, German or Russian English *Composition *Analytic Geometry *Calculus (Differential) Statistics, preferably Statistical Methods in Natural Sciences Geology Physical Geology Historic Geology Marine Sciences Introduction to Marine Biology Introduction to Oceanography Di? NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 OCEANOGRAPHY Physics Mathematics *General Physics *Algebra *Mechanics *Trigonmetry *Thermodynamics *Analytical Geometry Modern Physics *Calculus Electricity Differential Equations Hydrodynamics Theoretical Physics Geology *Physical Geology Chemistry Sedimentation *Principles of Chemistry (Inorganic) Meteorology *Qualitative Analysis (2 semesters) *Quantitative Analysis Physical Chemistry Organic Chemistry Zoology *Introduction or General Zoology FISHERIES Zoology *Introductory or General Zoology *Invertebrate Zoology *Comparative Vertebrate Anatomy or Vertebrate Zoology *Embryology *Physiology Genetics Microscopy and Microtechnique Histology Parasitology Ichthyology Limnology Mathematics *Algebra *Trigonometry *Analytical Geometry Statistical (Rreferably Statis- tical Methods in Natural Sciences) Calculus General Meteorology Marine Sciences Introduction to Marine Biology Introduction to Oceanography English *Composition Foreign Language German, Russian or French Botany General Botany Bacteriology Physics *General Physics Chemistry *Principles of Chemistry (Inorganic) *Qualitative Analysis Quantitative Analysis Organic Chemistry Physical Chemistry Biochemistry English *Composition Foreign Language German, Russian or French Marine Sciences Introduction to Marine Biology Introduction to Oceanography NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 213 MARINE GEOLOGY Physics Geology *General Physics (2 semesters) *General Geology Thermodynamics *Paleontology Modern Physics *Petrology *Optical Mineralogy Chemistry *Field Geology *Chemistry (2 semesters) *Structural Geology Physical Chemistry Stratigraphy Qualitative Analysis Sedimentation Quantitative Analysis Marine Sciences Mathematics Introduction to Marine Biology *Algebra Introduction to Oceanography *Trigonometry *Analytical Geometry English *Calculus *Composition Zoology Foreign Language *Introductory or General French, German or Russian 214 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Agricultural and Mechanical College of Texas College Station, Texas DEPARTMENT OF OCEANOGRAPHY AND METEOROLOGY The program of marine sciences at the A&M College of Texas consists of the work of the Department of Oceanography and Meteorology, which offers curricula leading to the M.S. and the Ph.D. degrees in oceanography, and of pertinent courses offered in other departments such as Biology, Wildlife Management, and Geology and Geophysics. An effort is made to maintain a balance between the biological, chemical, geoiogical, and physical aspects of oceanography, both in teaching and in research. Facilities include two buildings on the campus, a shore laboratory in Galveston, platform facilities offshore from Panama City, Florida, the 180' fully equipped oceanographic research vessel ALAMINOS, and two 65' vessels for inshore work. To date 45 students have completed M.S. degrees and 28 have completed Ph.D. degrees in oceanography. Instructional Staff: DALE F. LEIPPER, Ph.D., Professor and Head of Department DONALD W. HOOD, Ph.D., Professor of Chemical Oceanography LOUIS S. KORNICKER, Ph.D., Professor of Geological Oceanography HUGH J. McLellan, Ph.D., Professor of Physical Oceanography WILLIS E. PEQUEGNAT, Ph.D., Professor of Biological Oceanography ROBERT O. REID, M.S., Professor of Physical and Meteorological Oceanography WILLIAM H. CLAYTON, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Physical Oceanography JOHN D. COCHRANE, M.S. Associate Professor of Physical and Meteorological Oceanography GUY A. FRANCESCHINI, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Meteorological Oceanography SAMMY M, RAY, Ph.D., Assoc. Professor of Biological Oceanography ERNEST E. ANGINO, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Geochemical Oceanography SAYED Z. EL-SAYED, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Biological Oceanography EDWARD R. IBERT, Ph.D., Instructor of Chemical Oceanography WORTH D. NOWLIN, M.S., Instructor of Physical Oceanography GEORGE L. HUEBNER, Ph.D., Senior Research Scientist, Oceano- graphic Instrumentation RICHARD M. ADAMS, M.S., Administrative Scientist Degrees Offered: Master of Science in Oceanography Doctor of Philosophy in Oceanography NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 215 Undergraduate Courses: 201. SEA AND AIR SCIENCES ADAMS Oceanography and meteorology as scientific career fields. Features of the natural environment which affect man's daily life and activities. A survey course open to all college students. 401. INTRODUCTION TO OCEANOGRAPHY STAFF The various aspects of oceanography with emphasis upon those pertinent in the Gulf of Mexico. The principles upon which the disciplines of the subject are based. The unity of the marine sciences and their importance to man. The relations between oceanography and the fields of biology, chemistry, engineering, geography, geology, mathematics, meterology, and physics. Opportunities in oceanography. Graduate Courses: 600. SURVEY OF METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY A survey course in meteorology and oceanography designed for teachers of secondary school science. 603. SEA LABORATORY TECHNIQUES STAFF Practice in techniques used regularly aboard ship and in collecting field data. Cruise planning, navigational methods, collection of hydrographic, bathymetric and meteorological data, sediment sampling, biological sampling, and the collection of water samples for chemical analysis will be stressed. 610. PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY REID, LEIPPER, Mc LELLAN Survey of the physics of the sea; physical properties, transmission of light and sound in the sea, sea ice; heat budget of the sea and transformation of energy within the sea and at the boundaries; evaporation from the sea, descrip- tion of water masses and their origin; the horizontal and vertical circulation of the seas; the applied dynamic and kinematic formulas for circulation in the sea; the concept of dynamic equilibrium of the different concentrations within the sea; introduction to waves and tides of the sea. 216 6ll. GlZi 613. 614. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 THEORETICAL AND PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY REID Theoretical and quantitative aspects; equations of motion; equation of continuity; boundary conditions; distribution of properties in the presence of diffusion; heat budget; stability; dynamics and computation of ocean currents; wind currents; turbulence; friction. THEORY OF OCEAN WAVES REID, NOWLIN Theory of simple harmonic surface waves; wave groups and group velocity, wave energy and energy propagationl disper- sion. Theory of generation and decay of surface waves. Waves of large steepness, including solitary and enoidal waves. Modification of waves in shallow water, refraction; wave ray analysis and the phase diagram. Capillary waves; internal waves and shear waves. ENGINEERING ASPECTS OF OCEANOGRAPHY REID Applications of oceanographic knowledge in engineering. Sea disturbances, astronomical tides, seismic sea waves, seiches, surging in harbors, wind generation of ocean waves. Practical wave forecasting; wave refraction diagram analysis; propagation of waves in shallow water, breaking waves. Principles of similitude, fluid resistance, wave forces on fixed and floating structures. Sediment movement; coastal erosion and stabiliza- tion. Harbor location and design; breakwater, and dike con- struction. Density currents in estuaries; diffusion and dispersal and pollutants. DYNAMICS OF THE OCEAN AND ATMOSPHERE REID Advanced theory of the ocean dynamics, a comparison of the hydrodynamic and thermodynamic character of the ocean and the atmosphere; the mutual dependence of the dynamics and thermo- dynamics of the sea on those of the air and vice versa; some special theories from the mean equations of motion, gradient wind, jet stream, mutual adjustment of the mass field and velocity field in the sea; mutually coupled temperature varia- tions of the sea and the air; wind driven currents; the general hydrodynamic problem of the ocean and of the atmosphere, and an investigation of its uniqueness; the maintenance of the general circulation. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 217 620. BIOLOGICAL OCEANOGRAPHY PEQUEGNAT Critical study of important contributions defining major bio- logical divisions, provinces, and life zones of the oceans; effects of climate, chemical, and physical barriers, and phylo- geny on zoogeography; factors relating to population cycles; productivity problems; ecological interrelationships of major groups of plants and animals in the sea. 621. BIOLOGICAL OCEANOGRAPHY OF PEQUEGNAT THE GULF OF MEXICO Detailed examination of selected aspects of biological oceanog- raphy which are of major importance to the Gulf of Mexico. 630. GEOLOGICAL OCEANOGRAPHY KORNICKER Topography and characteristic features of the ocean bottom; marine shorelines and processes operating in the coastal zone; nature of marine sediments; marine transportation and deposi- tion of sedimentary materials; erosion of beaches. 631. GEOLOGICAL OCEANOGRAPHY OF KORNICKER THE GULF OF MEXICO Topography, stratigraphy, paleontology, and environments of the Gulf; littoral region and adjacent plains; forces acting on shorelines and bottoms; depositional surfaces, equilibria, equilibrium structures; tectonics; pleistocene history of region. Field trips. 640. CHEMICAL OCEANOGRAPHY HOOD The chemical composition and properties of sea water; the definition and calculation of salinity; the pH, excess base, and carbon dioxide system in the sea; nutrients, their cycles, and their distribution; oxygen and other dissolved gases; chem- istry of sedimentation; composition of organisms and organic constituents of sea water; marine corrosion; extraction of raw materials from the sea. 641. CHEMICAL OCEANOGRAPHY HOOD Detailed study of selected topics in chemical oceanography which pertain to the Gulf of Mexico; industrial utilization of sea water and chemical products obtained from marine plants and animals; water freshening; industrial corrosion problems; chemical aspects of photosynthesis and fertility of the sea; chemistry of estuarine waters. 10 218 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 642. LABORATORY TECHNIQUES IN HOOD, ANGINO OCEANOGRAPHY Detailed study will be made of methods of preparation and analysis of samples for biological, chemical, and geological investigations. The methods of analysis will concern oxygen, phosphate, silicate, nitrate, nitrite, salinity, carbon, sediment particle size, mineralogy, organic production and others. 643. GEOCHEMISTRY OF THE OCEAN KORNICKER, ANGINO Geochemistry of the oceanic hydrosphere, biosphere, and lithosphere; these are related to the atmosphere; study of the elements within them. 644. GEOCHEMISTRY OF THE OCEAN KORNICKER, ANGINO A detailed critical study of the geochemistry of sedimentation, the geochemical evolution of the ocean, the biogeochemistry of calcium carbonate and isotope geochemistry as related to the ocean. 651. METEOROLOGICAL OCEANOGRAPHY REID, COCHRANE The use of the conservative characteristics of the sea in forecasting meteorological and oceanographic phenomena. Calculation of ocean waves and swell, transformation of waves in shallow water, statistical summaries, modification of air Masses in contact with the ocean, forecasting of fog and squalls, effect of the oceans upon climate of the world, meteorological tides. 652. BOUNDARY LAYER PROBLEMS REID Theory or radiative exchange of energy at the sea surface; the theory of turbulent flow over hydrodynamically rough and smooth surfaces with application to the evaluation of the fluid frictional stresses at the boundaries of the sea, the evaluation of wind stress, evaporation, etc; the micro-structure of temperature and coefficients. 681. SEMINAR STAFF Presented by students and based upon their research work and upon surveys of the literature. 11 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 219 685. PROBLEMS STAFF A course offered to enable majors in oceanography to undertake and complete with credit in their particular fields of specialization limited investigations which do not fall within their thesis research and which are not covered by any other courses in the established curriculum. An example of the solution of a special problem in oceanography would be the work done in analyzing a special set of data collected on a cruise at sea. The course may also consist of a special series of problem discussions not given periodically, such as those offered by visiting scientists. 691. RESEARCH STAFF For thesis or dissertation. For information contact Dr. Dale F. Leipper, Head Department of Oceanography and Meteorology Agricultural and Mechanical College of Texas College Station, Texas WZ 220 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Graduate School, U. S. Department of Agriculture Washington 25, D. C. The Graduate School offers an organized program of courses leading to a certified statement of accomplishment in oceanography. 20 semester hours of credit with a grade of "C" or better are required, including the follow- ing courses: Required courses (6 Credits) Physical Properties of Sea Water (2) Geological Oceanography (2) Biological Oceanography (2) Electives (8 Credits) Principles of Underwater Sound (2) Applied Underwater Sound (2) Ocean Surface Waves (2) Marine Meteorology (2) Dynamic Oceanography (2) 6 semester hours of credit in fields related to oceanography, including biology, chemistry, engineering, geography, geology, mathematics, and meteorology. DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICAL SCIENCES Instructional Staff: HENRY STEVENS, Ph.D., Chairman SAMUEL A. ARNY, B.S., Oceanographer, U. S. Naval Oceanographic Office M. D. BURKHART, M.S., Oceanographer, U. S. Naval Oceanographic Office ROBERT ELDER, B.A., Physical Oceanographer, U. S. Naval Oceanographic Office JOHN J. SCHULE, JR., B.A., Division Director, Oceanographic Prediction Division, U. S. Naval Oceanographic Office MORRIS SCHULKIN, M.S., Chief Scientist, Marine Electronics Office, AVCO Corporation JOSHUA I. TRACEY, Ph.D., Geologist, Regional Geology, U. S. Geological Survey i = Degrees Offered: None 13 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 221 Undergraduate Courses: 5-360. GENERAL OCEANOGRAPHY BURNS Characteristics of oceans and factors that control distribution of properties and of plants and animals. Biology, chemistry, geology and physics of the oceans. Graduate Courses: 5-475. 5-476. 5-584. 5-655. 5-658. PRINCIPLES OF UNDERWATER SOUND SCHULKIN Fundamental principles of acoustics and application of these principles to underwater sound. Transmission of sound in the sea, including refraction, reflection, attenuation, and fluctuation. APPLIED UNDERWATER SOUND SCHULKIN Applied theory and practice for those entering the field or working in related fields. Ray theory, normal mode theory, sound channels, noise and reverberation, measurement techniques, and elements of transducer design. PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SEA WATER MAGNITZKY Examination of physical principles governing properties of sea water. Comparison of these properties with those of pure water. Definition and calculation of salinity and density. Distribution of salinity, temperature, and density. OCEAN SURFACE WAVES SCHULE Measurable properties of ocean surface waves and the methods of observing and analyzing ocean waves. Demon- stration of wave solution of hydrodynamic equations. Discussion of various sea surface models including their assumptions, solutions, and practical applications. Problems of propagation of waves in dispersive medium. Examples of various forecasting techniques. GEOLOGICAL OCEANOGRAPHY TRACEY Topography and composition of ocean floor and coastal features together with underlying causes. Emphasis on dynamic processes and deductive reasoning required to understand ocean features now being extensively observed with modern instrumentation. 14 222 5-662. 5-664. 5-666. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 MARINE METEOROLOGY BURKHART Introduction to fundamental principles of marine meteor- ology with special emphasis upon problems of marine climatologist and physical oceanographer. Descriptive and synoptic meteorology. Air mass analysis. Boundary processes. Radiation. Climatic principles. DYNAMIC OCEANOGRAPHY SCHULE Introduction to principles of vector analysis. Develop- ment of principles of conservation of mass and momentun. Vector equations of motion. Hydrostatic equations and density-pressure-depth relationship. Various current equations. Principles of turbulence. Equation of mean motion. Various approaches to problem of evaluating eddy stress terms. BIOLOGICAL OCEANOGRAPHY ARNY Detailed examination of marine ecosystem, stressing com- munity relationships and influence of the physiocochemical environment on marine life. Distribution of flora and fauna. For information contact: Dr. Henry Stevens Chairman, Departmental Committee on the Physical Sciences Graduate School U. S. Department of Agriculture Washington 25, D. C. 15 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 223 University of Alaska College, Alaska INSTITUTE OF MARINE SCIENCE The Institute of Marine Science has well-equipped research laboratories on the campus at College (Fairbanks), and access to workshops, library, computer center, and the usual university facilities. In addition, the Institute operates the Douglas Marine Station, near Juneau, with general purpose laboratories, radioisotope facilities, darkroom, and running sea water on the adjacent pier. A Ph.D. program is to be offered in 1963, but course descriptions and a faculty list were not furnished before this catalogue went to press. For information contact: Dr. K. M. Rae, Director Institute of Marine Science University of Alaska College, Alaska 16 224 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 The American University Washington 16, District of Columbia DEPARTMENT OF EARTH SCIENCES Instructional Steff: CAPTAIN PAUL S. BAUER, M.S., Adjunct Professor of Earth Sciences MATTHEW F. NORTON, Ph.D., Professor of Earth Sciences, Chairman ELLIS YOCHELSON, Ph.D., Lecturer Degrees Offered: Bachelor of Science and Master of Science in Earth Science with Emphasis in Oceanography. Courses: 27-321 27.342 27.506 27-521 27.522 27-541 PALEONTOLOGY NORTON Development of the major phyla as illustrated by fossils. STRATIGRAPHY AND SEDIMENTATION NORTON Principles governing sedimentary processes, distribution of sedimentary rocks in time and space, physical and biological correlation, analysis of sediments, inter- pretations of sedimentary environments. OCEANOGRAPHY BAUER Survey of the physics, chemistry and biology of the oceans; physiography and geology of ocean basins. BIOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES IN HEARTH SCIENCES YOCHELSON Morphology and taxonomy with special reference to fossil evidences for evolution; ecology and functional morphology; reconstruction of food chains. PALEOECOLOGY YOCHELSON Evidence for and methods of reconstructing depositional environments of ancient sediments. PHYSICAL PRINCIPLES IN EARTH SCIENCES BAUER Physical processes in the various spheres of the earth, their description, measurement, and probable cause. U7) NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 225 27.543 HYDROLOGY STAFF Hydrologic cycle; ground water, surface water, hydrogeo- chemistry. 27.600 ADVANCED TOPICS IN EARTH SCIENCES STAFF Study of a selected special topic or topics in Earth Seiences. 18 35-377 O— 6416 226 “NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California WILLIAM G. KERCKHOFF MARINE LABORATORY While the California Institute of Technology offers extensive course work leading to the Ph.D. in biology and geology, it does not offer courses or degrees in marine science. The Division of Biology, under the chairman- ship of Ray D. Owen, Ph.D., operates the Kerckhoff Marine Laboratory which offers facilities for teaching and research in marine zoology, embryology, and physiology. 19 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 227 The University of Chicago Chicago 37, Illinois THE DEPARTMENT OF THE GEOPHYSICAL SCIENCES The University of Chicago is expanding its activities in oceanography and hopes to offer more courses in marine science than at present. However, the principal emphasis will be on thorough preparation in basic disciplines with opportunities to apply them to marine research through affording students opportunity to participate in research at marine laboratories. At the present time research at the University is being conducted on storm surges, near-shore oceanic circulation, interaction of waves and bottom, geochemistry of marine sediments, interactions between marine organisms and their environment and the organization of marine communities. Facilities at the University include a wave tank, flume, wind tunnel, paleoecology labora- tory, sedimentology laboratory, geochemistry laboratories, hydrodynamics labor- atory, electron probe, x-ray diffraction equipment and several high speed com- putors (7090 IBM, 1620, MANIAC, UNIVAC). Field facilities are available at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution and the Pacific Marine Station. Instructional Staff SVERRE PETTERSSEN, Ph.D., Professor of Meteorology GEORGE W. PLATZMAN, Ph.D., Professor of Meteorology DAV FULTZ, Ph.D., Professor of Meteorology ROBERT L. MILLER, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Marine Geophysics and Geology RALPH G. JOHNSON, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Paleontology ROBERT A. BERNER, Ph.D., Assistant Professor JOEL W. HEDGPETH, Ph.D., University of the Pacific, Marine Station, Lecturer in Paleozoology JOHN ZEIGLER, Ph.D., Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Lecturer in Marine Geology Degrees Offered: None in Oceanography. The M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in the Geophysical Seiences are offered with specialization in areas included in oceanography . Courses Offered: 131, 132, INTRODUCTION TO THE GEOPHYSICAL SCIENCES STAFF 133. Broad problems of the planet, the earth's magnetic and gravitational fields, physical and biological oceanography, sediments, physical processes and circulation in the atmosphere, climatology, erosion processes, volcanology, the earth's interior, and mountain-building. 20 228 201. 282, 283 301, 302 303 e 339. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 FLUID DYNAMICS AND ELASTICITY PLATZMAN General continuum principles; waves; potential flow and vortex motion; dynamics in moving coordinates; boundary-layer theory. DYNAMICAL PROBLEMS IN THE GEOPHYSICAL SCIENCES PLATZMAN Dynamical problems of the atmosphere and oceans. HYDRODYNAMICS I, II, III. STAFF Integral momentum and energy principles; various topics in two-and three-dimensional potential flows including flow around objects and vortex motions; surface and internal gravity-wave motion, open-channel flow; dimen- sional analysis, viscosity, and the Navier-Stokes equa- tions; topics in boundary-layer theory, thermal convection, hydrodynamic stability, or turbulence. Occasional labora- tory work included. PALEOECOLOGY JOHNSON, OLSON Consideration of the problems of terrestrial and marine paleoecology. MARINE GEOLOGY STAFF MARINE GEOPHYSICS I. MILLER Surface and internal gravity wave motion; wind generation of waves and wave forecasting; wave refraction, diffraction. MARINE GEOPHYSICS IT MILLER Coastal processes, sediment transport, and related topics. RESEARCH IN MARINE GEOPHYSICS MILLER RESEARCH IN STORM SURGES PLATZMAN For Information Contact: Cheirmen, Department of the Geophysical Sciences The University of Chicago Chicago 37, Illinois 21 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 229 University of Connecticut torrs, Connecticut MARINE RESEARCH LABORATORY No separate department offers work towards a degree in ocean- ography. The University considers that marine science is interdisciplinary in nature. Students who wish to prepare themselves for work in marine science will select a special field. A committee composed of a major advisor in this field and two associate advisers in related fields will determine requirements for each student on an individual basis. Work in the marine sciences includes radiation biology (accumu- lation of nuclides, correlation of hydrographic and radio- biological factors), ecology (estuarine, larval, benthic), bacteriology (enumeration methods, cycles in estuaries), coastal climatology and oceanography (influence of weather on physical properties of sea water), phycology (growth, structure and distribution), and physiology (crustacean receptors, carbon dioxide fixation). Besides the usual facilities available on the main campus at Storrs, the University maintains a year-round laboratory at Noank at the mouth of the Mystic River (U.S. Coast and Geodetic Charts 358, 1211). Facilities include a two-story brick building with eight large laboratory rooms (most with salt water), common ancillary rooms, library, shop, etc., all provided with both special and common equipment; 30' dragger, four skiffs with out- board motors; a pick-up truck; rooming for about 25. Staff: John S, Rankin, Jr., Ph.D., Director and Professor of Zoology Edward G. Boettiger, Ph.D., Professor of Zoology Robert C. Cleverdon, Ph.D., Professor of Bacteriology David Dean, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Zoology Russeé@l P, Hunter, Ph.D., Professor of Wildlife Management C, Albert Kind, Ph.D., Professor of Zoology George R. Rumney, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Geography Donald M, Skauen, Ph.D., Professor of Pharmacy Francis R. Trainor, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Botany Ralph M, Wetzel, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Zoology Degrees Offered: Master of Science and Doctor of Philosophy in various departments with specialization in marine science. 22 230 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Courses: Geology and Geography 217. SEDIMENTATION FRANKEL Study of origin, transport, deposition and biogenesis of terrestrial, trasitional and marine sediments. 294. INTRODUCTORY OCEANOGRAPHY RUMNEY A physical geography of the sea, The character and dis- tribution of bathymetric regions, physical and chemical properties and dynamic processes are presented, as well as the chief oceanic environments and forms of life. Field trips to the shore required, Wildlife Management 285. ICHTHYOLOGY HUNTER A study of the structure and characteristics of fishes, their ecological relationships, life histories and economic importance. Enphasis on fresh water forms. 286. MARINE FISH AND FISHERIES HUNTER A study of the physical ahd biological factors affecting marine fisheries production. General oceanography, marine fishes and their ecological relationships are reviewed, 313, FISHERIES MANAGEMENT HUNTER 314, FISHERIES MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES HUNTER Zoology and Entomology 317. MARINE ECOLOGY DEAN The ocean as an environment, with special reference to shallow and estuarine regions; distribution of biota in relation to the physical and chemical environment. Field trips required, The following courses in other fields are frequent ly taken by students specializing in marine science, Bacteriology 300. SPECIAL PROBLEMS IN BACTERIOLOGY STAFF 311. SEMINAR STAFF 23 321. Siete NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 BACTERIAL PHYSIOLOGY I BACTERIAL PHYSIOLOGY II Botany 281. 300. 310. 363. 369. 391. INTRODUCTORY PHYCOLOGY INVESTIGATION OF SPECIAL TOPICS CYTOGENETICS MINERAL NUTRITION OF PLANTS APPLICATIONS OF ISOTOPIC TRACERS TO BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH SEMINAR Chemistry 73S 242. 314-315. 332. 345. 353-354. MICROCHEMICAL TECHNIQUES IDENTIFICATION OF ORGANIC COMPOUNDS ADVANCED INORGANIC CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS PHYSICAL-ORGANIC CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL KINETICS AND PHOTOCHEMISTRY Civil Engineering 260. 261. Zi) ibe 391. 398. WATER AND SEWAGE TREATMENT SANITARY ENGINEERING LABORATORY ELEMENTARY SURVEYING ADVANCED SANITARY ENGINEERING LABORATORY STREAM SANITATION 24 231 CLEVERDON CLEVERDON TRAINOR STAFF NEWCOMER KOONTZ KOONTZ WETHERELL STAFF STOCK BOBBITT WARD ILMET, SMITH WARING TIPPY, WIDMER, SMITH WIDMER, SMITH STEPHENS, BREEN WIDMER WIDMER 232 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Geology & Geography 263, METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY RUMNEY 305. SPECIAL PROBLEMS IN GEOLOGY STAFF 325. SPECIAL PROBLEMS IN GEOGRAPHY STAFF Pharmacy 312. BIONUCLEONICS SKAUEN Physics 300. INDEPENDENT STUDY STAFF 304, RESEARCH IN PHYSICS STAFF 310, SEMINAR BARTRAM Wildlife Management 288, LIMNOLOGY HUNTER Statistics 300. INVESTIGATION OF SPECIAL TOPICS STAFF 310. ADVANCED STATISTICAL METHODS STAFF 340. STATISTICAL METHODS PECULIAR TO BIOLOGY Zoology and Entomology 300. INDEPENDENT STUDY STAFF 303, RESEARCH STAFF 310. SEMINAR STAFF 320, ABVANCED INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY RANKIN, DEAN 323. THE PHYSIOLOGY OF DEVELOPMENT CLARK 326, BIOCHEMICAL TECHNIQUES KIND, COOK 335. COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY BOETTIGER 25 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 233 337. CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY BERNSTEIN 344, HELMINTHOLOGY PENNER 353. PRINCIPLES AND METHODS OF SYSTEMATIC ZOOLOGY SLATER For information contact: Dr. John S, Rankin, Jr., Director Marine Research Laboratory University of Connecticut Storrs, Connecticut 26 234 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Columbia University New York 27, New Yor Graduate students in marine sciences at Columbia University normally enroll in the Department of Geology, those of marine biology enroll either in the Department of Zoology or of Botany. There is no separate Department of Oceanography. Emphasis is on providing for each graduate student adequate training in the fundamental sciences (chemistry, geology, physics, mathematics, and zoology) appropriate to his special field of interest. To provide this training, the student with his advisor may select from the entire list of course offerings in the Graduate Departments at Columbia University. Research facilities for graduate students in oceanography are available in laboratories and on ships of the Lamont Geological Observatory, a separate institute within Columbia University. Instructional Staff Professor Professor Professor Professor Professor Professor Professor Professor Professor Professor Wallace Broecker Charles L. Drake Maurice Ewing, Director of the Lamont Geological Observatory Bruce Heezen J, Laurence Kulp John E, Nafe, Chairman of the Geology Department Jack E. Oliver William Sackett George Sutton J. Lamar Worzel Professor Georg WUst Degrees offered: Master of Arts in Oceanography Doctor of Philosophy in Oceanography Courses: Students commonly select courses from the following list. The list is not inclusive, nor is any particular course necessarily required. A complete description of these and other course offerings may be found in the bulletin of the Graduate Faculties ef Columbia University, and of the School of Engineering and Applied Science, Chemistry: Advanced inorganic chemistry Introduction to chemical physics Chemical and statistical thermodynamics Radio chemistry 2M, NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Geology: Advanced geologic mapping Mineralogy of metalic minerals Mineralogy of non-metalic minerals Principles of sedimentation Experimental marine sedimentology Paleozoic and later stratigraphy of North America Principles of geomorphology I and II Principles of structural geology Geotectonics Introduction to economic geology Groundwater geology Introduction to paleontology Micropaleontology Petrology of igneous rocks Petrology of metamorphic rocks Chemical equilibria in geologic systems Atomic structure of minerals Isotope geology Geochemistry Advanced geochemistry Submarine geology I and II Introduction to geophysics Survey of geophysic prospecting Basic dynamic meteorology Dynamical weather prediction General circulation of planetary atmosphere Physical meteorology Oceanography Dynamic oceanography Application of digital methods to geophysical problems Upper atmoshpere physics General geophysics (seismology) General geophysics (gravity and magnetism) Mathematics and Engineering Mathematics: Advanced calculus for science majors Differential equations Partial differential equations Applied mathematics I and II Functions of a complex variable Numerical solution of engineering problems Physics: Mechanics Theory of electricity and magnetism Thermodynamics Mathematical methods of physics Introduction to theoretical physics Advanced laboratory 28 239 236 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Elektromagnetic theory I and II Analytical Dynamics I and II Elasticity and hydrodynamics Zoology: General invertebrate zoology General vertebrate zoology Biometrics Comparative physiology Experimental embryology General genetics Genetics of microorganisms 29 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 237 Cornell University Ithaca, New Yor Graduate students and a limited number of undergraduate students participate in long range research on the oxygen resources of coastal waters, and on the physiology of marine zooplankton, during the summer months and other academic recesses. Coopera- tive research with the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution similarly provides opportunity for student experience. Academic facilities at Ithaca include an oceanographic laboratory equipped for analytical and experimental studies. DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION Instructional Staff: GUSTAV A. SWANSON, Ph.D., Professor of Conservation; Head, Department of Conservation JOHN P. BARLOW, Ph.D., Associate Professor Oceanography ALFRED W. EIPPER, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Fishery Biology EDWARD C, RANEY, Ph.D., Professor of Zoology DWIGHT A. WEBSTER, Ph.D., Professor of Fishery Biology Degrees Offered: None in marine sciences, but the 8.S. is given with a major sequence in marine ecology; and candidates for the M.S. and Ph.D. may major or minor in oceandgraphy and marine ecology, fishery biology, or vertebrate zoology (ichthyology). Research projects including graduate student dissertation problems are continuously in progress in Long Island coastal areas, and others are conducted by arrangement with appropriate marine ~ stations. Courses Offered: 22. ICHTHYOLOGY RANEY Evolution, relationships, structure, habits, ecology, and literature of fishes. Laboratory studies on structure and identification of fishes. Field studies on ecology and life histories, 122. ADVANCED ICHTHYOLOGY RANEY A continuation of Course 22, alternating with it. May be taken without Course 22 as prerequisite. 30 238 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 173. 175, 180. 181, 407. FISHERY BIOLOGY WEBSTER Principles of fishery management, stressing dynamics of growth, populations, and production. Techniques of fishery management and the investigational aspects of fishery biology are also included, FISHERY BIOLOGY LABORATORY WEBSTER Field and biometrical exercises in fishery management. OCEANOGRAPHY BARLOW Physical and chemical aspects of the oceans, particu- larly as background for marine ecology; geography and geology of the ocean floor; currents, tides, distribu- tion of temperatures. Laboratory work in processing oceanographic data. MARINE ECOLOGY BARLOW The sea as an environment; the physical and chemical characteristics of marine habitats; the productivity of the sea; the relation of hydrography to fisheries and faunal distributions. RESEARCH PROGLEMS IN OCEANOGRAPHY BARLOW For information contact: Dr. John P. Barlow Department of Conservation Cornell University Ithaca, New York DEPARTMENT OF BOTANY Instructional Staff: GEORGE €. KENT, Ph.D., Professor of Plant Pathology; Head, Department of Plant Pathology; Acting Head, Department of Botany JOHN M. KINGSBURY, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Botany Degrees Offered: None in marine sciences, Appropriate thesis research problems dealing with marine algae may be undertaken by candidates for the M.S. or Ph.D. degrees under the direction of Professor Kingsbury. Problems requiring living materials which cannot be cultured ordinarily will be performed by arrangement at an appropriate marine station; 31 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 239 Courses Offered: 112, 1S 171. BIOLOGY OF THE ALGAE KINGSBURY Structure, ecology, physiology, origins, economic importance and evolution in the groups of the blue- green, green, yellowgreen, golder brown, and euglenoid algae are discussed, Evolutionary and ecological significance of different pigment systems are demonstrated, Biologically important characteris- tics of ponds and streams are brought out in relation to the algae populating them. Emphasis is placed also on particular biochemicak, physiological, or structural characteristics of algae of potential value in research on general biological problems, Living material of a large number of genera is pro- vided in laboratory to illustrate lecture topics, to demonstrate and provide practice in techniques of isolation and culture, and to develop a working familiarity with the local algal flora. BIOLOGY OF THE ALGAE KINGSBURY Although a continuation of Course 112, covering the groups of the diatoms, dinoflagellates, brown, and red algae and emphasizing the characteristics of the marine environment, this course is complete in itself and need not be preceeded by Course 112. Photographic transparencies of living specimens are used extensively to supplement examination of preserved material in laboratory, Participation in an optional field trip to varied marine and brackish habitats on Cape Cod and Cape Ann, Massachusetts in late spring may be limited to 12 students. SPECIAL PROBLEMS IN PHYCOLOGY KINGSBURY Students engaged in special problems or making special studies may register in this course. They must satisfy the instructor that their preparation warrants their choice of problem. For information contact: Dr. John M. Kingsbury Department of Botany Cornell University Ithaca, New York 32 240 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 University of Delaware Newark, Delaware DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES Instructional Staff: W. ROBERT A. BAILEY, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Biological Sciences ARNOLD M. CLARK, Ph.D., Professor of Biological Sciences FRANKLIN C. DAIBER, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Biological Sciences JAMES C. KAKAVAS, Ph,D., Associate Dean, School of Graduate Studies and Professor of Biological Sciences EVA KONRAD, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Biological Sciences JAMES B. KRAUSE, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Biological Sciences RICHARD A. NYSTROM, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Biological Sciences RAPHAEL R. RONKIN, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Biological Sciences HORACE J. SAWIN, Ph.D., Research Professor of Biological Sciences and Geology CARL N. SHUSTER, JR., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Biological Sciences and Director, University of Delaware Marine Laboratories G..FRED SOMERS, Ph.D., Chairman and Professor of Biological Sciences MARENES R. TRIPP, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Biological Scineces PHILIP S, WOODS, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Biological Sciences Degrees Offered: Master of Arts and Master of Science in Biological Sciences Doctor of Philosophy in Biological Sciences (Specialization in Marine Biology) Upper Division Courses: B427. INTRODUCTION TO BIOLOGICAL OCENAOGRAPHY SHUSTER Saltwater ecosystems, with emphasis on Delaware Bay and the Atlantic Ocean, B491, INTRODUCTION TO RESEARCH STAFF Original research, Problem selected in accord with student's interests and research activities in the Department 33 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 241 Graduate Courses: B505. B512. B527. B528. B530. B531. B560. BS69., B570. B589, COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY NYSTROM Comparison of the reactions of different groups of animals to their environments with emphasis on mechanisms of adaptive significance; comparison of relationships between effector and integrative systems, SPECIAL PROBLEMS STAFF Original investigations in the biological sciences. SELECTEN TOPICS IN OCEANOGRAPHY STAFF Seminar with field examination of techniques. MARINE INVERTEGRATES SHUSTER Advanced training in methods for studying the biology of specific marine organisms. ICHTHYOLOGY DAIBER Biology of fishes, including structure and function, re- production, development, behavior, geographic distribution, and systematics. FISH ECOLOGY DAIBER Ecological principles as exemplified by fishes. Laboratory and field studies, ESTUARINE HYDROGRAPHY STAFF Analysis of estuarine systems: chemistry, physics, geology and biology. THESIS STAFF RESEARCH STAFF Independent and original research in the biological sciences. Seminar participation. SEMINAR STAFF Reports and discussion of selected topics and current develop- ments in the biological seiences,. 34 35-377 O—64——17 242 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Duke University Durham, North Carolina DUKE UNIVERSITY MARINE LABORATORY - DEPARTMENT OF BOTANY AND DEPARTMENT OF ZOOLOGY Instructional Staff: Degrees Courses: J. R. BAILEY, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Zoology C. G. BOOKHOUT, Ph.D., Director; Professor of Zoology J. D. COSTLOW, JR., Ph.D. (Research and Thesis supervision only) Assistant Professor of Zoology I. E. GRAY, Ph.D., Professor of Zoology la alo HUMM, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Botany WANDA S. HUNTER, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Zoology T. W. JOHNSON, Ph, D., Associate Professor of Botany D. A. LIVINGSTONE, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Zoology MURIEL I. SANDEEN, Ph.D., Assistnat Professor of Zoology F. J. VERNBERG, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Zoology Offered: A separate degree is not offered in marine sciences, but in either the Botany or Zoology Department with a concen- tration of courses in Marine Biology and a thesis in the subject. Botany 207. MARINE MYCOLOGY JOHNSON Introduction to the structure, classification, culture, and physiology of marine and brackish water fungi. Special problems on groups or individual species. Lectures, laboratory, field trips, introduction to periodical literature, and individual investigations. 211. MARINE ALGAE HUMM Classification, taxonomy, morphology, distribution, ecology, and economic uses of marine algae; prepar- ation of herbarium material. In addition to collection, field work will provide students an opportunity to observe associations of marine algae in situ by means of diving equipment, if they wish to use it. Zoology 203, MARINE ECOLOGY GRAY A study of marine animals in relation to environment. Consideration of environmental factors, succession, rhythms, communities, intraspecific and interspecific. 35 204. 214, 216, 238. 249, 250. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 relations, productivity, conservation, problems, etc., concerned with animal life in the ocean. Lectures, reviews, conferences, field and lab- oratory work, : PARASITES OF MARINE ANIMALS HUNTER The major groups of parasites will be considered in relation to different types of marine animals. Systemstics of the parasites present will be con- sidered along with host-parasite relations and life cylees. A special problem will be selected by the student and completed during the last two weeks of the course. OCEANOGRAPHY LIVINGSTONE An introduction to the study of the ocean, Con- sideration of its physical, chemical, biochemical, and geological processes. Lectures, laboratory, field trips, and introduction to periodical liter- ature. (Advanced courses in Oceanography planned for next year with new staff.) LIMNOLOGY LIVINGSTONE A study of lakes, ponds, and streams, including their origin, development, geochemistry, energy balanee, productivity, and the dynamics of the plant and animal communities living in them. Lec- tures, field trips, laboratory work. SYSTEMATIC ZOOLOGY BAILEY The fundamental theory and practice involved in the collection, identification, and classification of animals. PHYSIOLOGY OF INVERTEGRATF RECEPTORS, EFFECTORS, AND COORDINATION SANDEEN A study of sense organs, endocrine and nervous mechanisms, muscles, chromatophores and other effec- tors in selected invertebrate animals, Lectures, reports and laboratory. PHYSIOLOGICAL ECOLOGY OF MARINE ANIMALS VERNBERG A study of the physiological responses of marine animals in relation to certain environmental fac- tors and evolution, Animals representing numerous phyla and from various habitats are studied. 36 243 244 274. 278. 351, 352. 353, 354, 355, 356. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 MARINE INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY BOOKHOUT A study of invertebrate animals that occur in the Beaufort region. A number of field trips will be made to a variety of habitats to study, collect, and classify animals in their natural environment. The structure and habits of living invertebrates, as well as their behavior under experimental con- ditions, will be studied in the laboratory. INVERTEBRATE EMBRYOLOGY BOOKHOUT Lectures, readings, and laboratory work dealing with rearing, development, and life history of invertebrates, DEPARTMENTAL SEMINAR STAFF A weekly meeting of graduate students and faculty to hear reports and to discuss biological facts, theories, and problems. RESEARCH STAFF Students who have had proper training may carry on research under direction of members of the staff in various fields, SEMINAR STAFF One or more seminar courses in particular fields are given each year by various members of the staff. 37 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 245 Florida State University Tallahassee, Florida OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTE Instructional Staff: TAKASHI ICHIYE, D.Sc., Assistant Professor of Physical Oceanography R. W. MENZEL, Ph.D,, Associate Professor of Marine Biology CHARLES B, METZ, Ph.D., Professor of Marine Biology and Associate Director Degrees Offered: M.S. and Ph.D, degrees are awarded through Biological Sciences, Geology, Chemistry, Meteorology and Physics with specialization in marine science, Upper Division Courses: Biology 430, SURVEY OF MARINE SCIENCE MENZEL, OTHERS A survey of the marine sciences including physical ocean- ography, bacteriology, algology, ecology, and marine zoology. Field work at the Marine Laboratory. Taught by invited guest scientist in summer, and by Oceanographic Institute staff in first trimester. Meteorology 455, INTRODUCTORY PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY The physical, geological and chemical properties of the oceans and their containers, and the behavior of the oceans. Meteorology 456, FIELD WORK IN OCEANOGRAPHY Methods and equipment used in oceanographic field work are demonstrated and applied to field problems. Graduate Courses: Biology 545-6=7, PROBLEMS IN MARINE BIOLOGY MENZEL, OTHERS Selected problems in marine biology. Offered in regular trimester and summer, Geology 519. MARINE GEOLOGY Origin and present form of the ocean basins; characteris- tics of oceanic crustal rocks; marine sediments, processes, and environments; current problems in marine geology. 38 246 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Geology 530. ADVANCED SEDIMENTOLOGY GOODELL Quantitative aspects of sedimentology; advanced techniques and procedures; analysis of sediment data, Meteorology 555. ADVANCED PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY -ICHIYE Ocean waves, tides, currents, diffusion, turbulence, heat budget, transmission of energy. Meteorology 591, DIRECTED STUDIES IN OCEANOGRAPHY -ICHIYE Selected topics in physical oceanography. Zoology 561=2=-3. EXPERIMENTAL EMBRYOLOGY SEMINAR-METZ Selected topics in embryology. Additional related course work is available in the various science departments from cooperating faculty. 39 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 247 The University of Georgia Athens, Georgia MARINE INSTITUTE The university of Georgia Marine Institute, located at Sapelo Island, Georgia, is operated by the University. in cooperation with the Sapelo Island Research Foundation. Laboratory facilities include radioisotope counting and handling equipment, spectrophotometers, constant-temperature rooms, running estuarine water, chromatographic equipment, and library. The 65-foot research vessel, Kit Jones, is equipped with both hydrographic and trawling winches, loran naviagtion, sonic sounding, and interior laboratory space. It can accomodate four scientists for work along the coast and over the conti- nental shelf. Research now in progress at the Marine Institute includes the following. Studies of near-shore sedimentation processes. Geology of the continental shelf. Geochemistry of carbonate sediments. Flow of energy and elements through the ecosystems of the salt marsh, estuaries, and continental shelf waters. Relation of level- bottom communities to sediments. Translocation of materials in halophytic plants, Collection and processing of organisms for studies of the biochemistry of bioluminescence. Collection of organisms for studies of microbial metabolism of uronic acids. Collection of organisms for a study collection of the regional fauna and flora. Staff: Dirk Frankenberg, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Zoology Vernon J. Henry, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Geology John H. Hoyt, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Geology Orrin Pilkey, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Geology Lawrence R. Pomeroy, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Zoology Kenneth L. Webb, Ph.D. Assistnat Professor of Botany Associated members of the University faculty not members of the staff of the Marine Institute: Milton J. Cormier, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Chemistry Leon S, Dure, Ph.D. Research Assistant Robert G. Eagon, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Bacteriology © Eugene P, Odum, Ph.D, Alumni Foundation Distinguished Professor of Zoology William J. Payne, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Bacteriology and Head of the Department of Bacteriology Donald C. Scott, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Zoology and Chair- man, Marine Institute Advisory Board 40 248 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Degrees Offered: No degrees are offered in the marine sciences, but work toward graduate degrees in zoology, geology, and botany may be under- taken with research in marine science carried out at the Marine Institute. Courses: Zoology 353, ECOLOGY Odum 605, ICHTHYOLOGY Scott - 654. LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY Pomeroy, Scott 656. MARINE BIOLOGY Pomeroy 807. ADVANCED INVERTABRATE ZOOLOGY Thomas 808. ADVANCED INVERTABRATE ZOOLOGY Thomas 854, PHYSIOLOGICAL ECOLOGY Odum 855. ADVANCED ECOLOGY Odum Geology 609. MARINE GEOLOGY Henry 603. INVERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY Henry 605. SEDIMENTATION AND STRATIGRAPHY Hamblin For Information contact: Prospective visiting investigators should write to Dr. George H. Lauff, Research Coordinator, Sapelo Island Research Founda- tion, Sapelo Island, Georgia, Prospective graduate students should write to the appropriate department head at the University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia. 4] NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 249 Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts COMMITTEE ON OCEANOGRAPHY There is no separate department offering work toward a degree in oceanography. The University considers that specialization in marine science should be undertaken within one of the classical scientific dis- ciplines, such as biology, geology, physics, or chemistry. The Committee on Oceanography will assist students who wish to prepare themselves for work in this special field, and will help them arrange joint programs of study when that is desired, Members of the Committee are: FRANCIS BIRCH, Ph.D., Professor of Geology GEORGE F. CARRIER, Ph.D., Professor of Mechanical Engineering GEORGE L. CLARKE, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Zoology, Chair- man of the Committee RICHARD M, GOODY, Dr.Phil., Professor of Meteorology FREDERICK V. HUNT, Ph.D., Professor of Physics COLUMBUS ISELIN, S.D., Professor of Physical Oceanography BOSTWICK H. KETCHUM, Ph.D., Lecturer on Biological Oceanography GILES W. MEAD, PH.D., Curator of Fishes, Museum of Comparative Zoology ALAN R. ROBINSON, +h.D., Assistant Professor of Meteorology and Oceanography RAYMOND SIEVER, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Geology HENRY M. STOMMEL, A.M., Professor of Oceanography E. BRIGHT WILSON, JR., Ph.D., Professor of Chemistry Degrees Offered: None in oceanography. Students must qualify in one of the classical scientific disciplines. Courses: The following are courses in oceanography or closely related thereto. Other suggested courses for students wishing to specialize in marine science may be obtained from the bulletin "Instruction in Oceanography." Biology 130, BIOLOGY OF FISHES MEAD The classification, structure, and natural history of fishes. 143. PRINCIPLES OF ECOLOGY CLARKE The basic interrelations of plants and animals with the physical and biological factors of the environment. The fundamental concepts of environmental biology. The control of growth, distribution, reproduction, and behaviro; develop- 42 250 243. 245. 333. 335. 343, 345. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 ment and organization of populations; energy flow and dynamic balance in communities; and productivity of natural areas and biological resources. PROBLEMS IN AQUATIC ECOLOGY CLARKE Fundamental ecological relations of the aquatic environment with special consideration to problems of most recent interest in marine biology, oceanography, limology, fishery biology, and conservation. BIOLOGICAL OCEANOGRAPHY KETCHUM The major problems in the development, seasonal changes, and variations of populations of aquatic organisms; Recent develop- ments in aquatic biology will be emphasized and will include such subjects as photosynthetic production and its relationship to environmental conditions, the transfer of energy and elements through the food web, the biologically controlled distribution of elements in the sea, estuarine and coastal circulation in relation to the distribution of populations, the uses of radio- isotopes for the study of oceanographic problems and biological effects of the contamination of the sea with radioisotopes. MALACOLOGY CLENCH ICHTHYOLOGY MEAD ECOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY CLARKE GRADUATE RESEARCH IN BIOLOGICAL OCEANOGRAPHY KETCHUM Meteorology and Oceanography 201. 202. 206. 302. 303. DYNAMICS OF ATMOSPHERES AND OCEANS ROBINSON Dynamics of rotating and convecting fluid systems with application to phenomena in the atmosphere and oceans. SPECIAL TOPICS IN GEOPHYSICAL FLUID DYNAMICS ROBINSON Advanced topics in theoretical meteorology and oceanography. PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY STOMMEL This course is primarily concerned with the general circula- tion of the ocean, and relates various hydrodynamical models to a fairly detailed amount of the observational material availabel for its description. RESEARCH IN GEOPHYSICAL HYDRONAMICS ROBINSON READING IN GEOPHYSICAL HYDRODYNAMICS ROBINSON 43 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 251 University of Hawaii Honolulu 14, Hawaii The University of Hawaii does not have a single all-inclusive department of oceanography which deals with all aspects of marine science, but because of the ideal location of the University of Hawaii several university departments are engaged in teaching and research on marine subjects. Major facilities for marine research and teaching include the research vessels NEPTUNE I (83 feet) and SALPA (43 feet) and several small motorboats; Dept. of Zoology aquariums with running sea water at various temperatures; Hawaii Marine Laboratory at Coconut Island; Honolulu Aquarium at Waikiki; Geophysics Institute Laboratories; and the Hydrodynamics Laboratory at Kewalo Basin. HAWAII INSTITUTE OF GEOPHYSICS Instructional Staff: George P. Woollard Ph.D., Director Doak C. Cox, M.A., Geophysicist and Professor of Geology Other instructional staff members are listed under the Department of Meteorology and Oceanography and Department of Geology. Degrees Offered: None. Research training is offered for graduate students seeking Degrees in physical, chemical and geological oceanography offered through other University Departments. HAWAII MARINE LABORATORY Instructional Staff: A. Banner, Ph.D., Director (see also Departments of Botany and Zoology) Degrees Offered: None. Research training is offered for graduate students in biological oceanography and marine biology seeking degrees offered through the different University Departments of Biology. 44 252 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Courses: It is intended to start with the Summer Institute in Marine Sciences, commencing in 1964 where a selection of six of the following graduate level courses would be taught each summer. Botany S-586 Biological Productivity of the Sea S-000 Tropical Phycology S-000 Marine Mycology and Bacteriology S-000 Taxonomy of Phytoplankton S-000 Experimental Marine Botany S-000 Atoll Ecology Chemistry S-580 Oceanographic Chemistry Geology S-470 Marine Geology S-671 Nearshore Geology S-672 Geology of Ocean Basins S-000 Marine Invertebrate Paleontology Oceanography S-600 Physical Oceanography Microbiology S-000 Marine Protozoology Zoology S-606 Comparative Animal Behavior S-620 Marine Ecology S-000 Hawaiian Reef Organisms S-646 Comparative Invertebrate Physiology S-621 Physiological Ecology S-000 Taxonomy of Zooplankton S-000 Marine Parasites S-000 Invertebrate Embryology S-000 Experimental Embryology S-622 Isotopic Tracers in Biology 45 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 DEPARTMENT OF METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY Instructional Staff: Carl W, Adams, M.S., Assistant Professor of Meteorology and Oceanography Richard A. Barkely, Ph.D., Chief, Oceanography Investigation, Honolulu Biological Laboratory; Affiliate Graduate Faculty member. Taivo Laevastu, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Oceanography Gunter Seckel, M.S., Oceanographer, Honolulu Biological Laboratory; Affiliate Graduate Faculty Member. Degrees Offered: Master of Science in Oceanography. Upper Division Courses: 550 GENERAL OCEANOGRAPHY ADAMS, (BANNER, BARKLEY, DOTY, MOBERLY, ZEITLIN) Physical properties of the sea; distribution of temperature, salinity, density; radiation; waves, tides, currents and other motion; ocean-atmosphere inter-relationships; relationships of physical oceanography to marine geology, chemistry, biology and meteorology. 575 REGIONAL OCEANOGRAPHY LAEVASTU, SECKEL Processes at the surface and formation of water types; formation of deep waters; water type and mass analyses; coastal and oceanic waters; water masses by natural regions and description of the characteristics of oceanic regions. Graduate Courses: 600 PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY BARKLEY Dynamics of ocean currents, waves, tides and seiches, ocean-atmosphere interaction processes, methods of solving problems in physical oceanography. 601 OCEANOGRAPHIC FORECASTING LAEVASTU, (COX WOOLLARD) Forecasting of waves and surface currents; sea and weather routing of ships, meteorological services; application of various forecasts in navigation, fisheries and marine engineering. 46 253 254 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 675 OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTRUMENTATION, LABORATORY RESEARCH AND FIELD WORK LAEVASTU Description and demonstration of oceanographic instruments and observation practices. Laboratory exercises and treatment of oceanographic data. Sea practice on research vessels arranged through the Department. 684 PROBLEMS IN OCEANOGRAPHY LAEVASTU Study of selected subjects in all fields of oceanography. Preparation of term papers required (review or analyses of available data). In addition to the specific courses in oceanography, courses in meteorology treat some complementary subjects in oceanography (e.g., hydrodynamics, etc.) DEPARTMENT OF BOTANY Instructional Staff: M. S. Doty, Ph.D., Professor of Botany Degrees Offered: Master of Science in Botany Doctor of Philosophy in Botany Courses: ie 586 BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTIVITY OF THE SEA DOTY, (LAEVASTU) Qualities and functions of the sea; relationship to marine organisms. 681 PHYCOLOGY-CHLOROPHYTA DOTY Systematics, function, and utilization considered at an advanced level. 682 PHYCOLOGY-PHYTOPLANKTON DOTY Systematics, functions, and utilization considered at an advanced level. 683 PHYCOLOGY-MYXOPHYTA AND PHAEOPHYTA DOTY Systematics, functions and utilization considered at an advanced level. 47 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 255 684 PHYCOLOGY-RHODOPHYTA DOTY Systematics, functions, and utilization considered at an advanced level. DEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY Instructional Staff: Harry Zeitlin, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Chemistry Degrees Offered: Master of Science in Chemistry (research in problems related to the marine environment) Doctor of Philosophy in Chemistry (research in problems related to the marine environment) Courses: 580 OCEANOGRAPHIC CHEMISTRY ZEITLIN A theoretical and descriptive study of the chemistry of the oceans and practice in the Standard analytical methods important to chemical oceanography. DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY Instructional Staff: Theodore Chamberlain, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Geology Ralph M. Moberly, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Geology Degrees Offered: M.S. Degree in Geological Sciences Ph.D. Degree in Geological Sciences Courses: 470 MARINE GEOLOGY CHAMBERLAIN A survey of marine geologic processes and forms. Field work involving marine geologic equipment and techniques. 671 NEARSHORE MARINE PROCESSES CHAMBERLAIN Waves, tides, currents, winds and their effects upon beaches and nearshore sediments. 48 256 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 672 SEMINAR IN GEOLOGY OF OCEAN BASIN MOBERLY Structure, topography, sediments, and history of islands, ocean basins, and continental margins. 673 PRINCIPLES OF SEDIMENTOLOGY - CHAMBERLAIN Physics of erosion, transportation and deposition. Statistical and other analytical procedures applicable to sediments. 674 SEDIMENTARY PETROGRAPHY AND STRATIGRAPHY MOBERLY Composition of carbonate and other sediments and sedimentary rocks; interpretation of their variation. Methods of study. DEPARTMENT OF ZOOLOGY Instructional Staff: Albert H. Banner, Ph.D., Professor of Zoology, Director, Hawaii Marine Laboratory George W. Chu, D.Sc., Professor of Microbiology and Zoology Hubert W. Frings, Ph.D., Professor of Zoology William A. Gosline, Ph.D., Professor of Zoology Sidney C. Hsiao, Ph.D., Professor of Zoology Fred I. Kamemto, Assistant Professor of Zoology Donald C. Matthews, Ph.D., Proffesor of Zoology Barry S. Muir, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Zoology Ernest S. Reese, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Zoology Albert L. Tester, Ph.D., Senior Professor of Zoology, Chairman of the Department. Sidney J. Twonsley, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Zoology Pieter Van Weel, Ph.D., Professor of Zoology Affiliate Staff: Philip Helfrich, Ph.D., Assistant Director, Hawaii Marine Laboratory John C. Marr, M.A., Area Director, Honolulu Biological Laboratory, U. S. Bureau of Commercial Fisheries Michio Takata, M.S., Director, State Division of Fish and Game NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 200 Degrees Offered: Master of Science in Zoology, including Marine Zoology Doctor of Philosophy in Marine Zoology. Upper Division Courses in Marine Biology: 425 MICROTECHNIQUE MATTHEWS Fixing, staining, mounting of tissues, entire animals and organs. 431 BIOMETRY TESTER Elementary statistical methods; confidence interval chi-square, t-test, normal distributions, regression, correlation. 432 ADVANCED BIOMETRY TESTER Analysis of variance and covariance, curvilinear regression, multiple correlation, design of experiments. 525-526 GENERAL ICHTHYOLOGY GOSLINE First semester: anatomy, physiology, ecology, distribution. Second semester: classification with reference to Hawaiian species. Graduate Courses: 603 ZOOGEOGRAPHY Animal distributions; physiographic, climatic and historic factors. 606 COMPARATIVE ANIMAL BEHAVIOR REESE ‘Physiological basis, ontogenetic and phylogenetic origins, and categories of behavior. A study of innate, learned, and social behavior with emphasis on the innate behavior of marine species. 50 35-377 O—64—__18 258 607 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 PHYSIOLOGICAL BASES OF ANIMAL BEHAVIOR FRINGS Sensory, neural, and endocrine determinants of animal behavior patterns and communication. 615-616 ADVANCED INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY TOWNSLEY 620 621 622 629 631 646 691 Comparative morphology, development, taxonomy and phylogeny of invertebrate animals. Identification and classification of reef and shore fauna. MARINE ECOLOGY REESE Natural history, behavior, and relation of invertebrates and fishes to environment. PHYSIOLOGICAL ECOLOGY VAN WEEL Physiological adaptations to environmental, physical, and biotic features. ISOTOPIC TRACERS IN BIOLOGY TOWNSLEY Chemical and physical features of radioactive isotopes used in biological work. Methods of detection; application to biological systems. METHODS OF FISHERY INVESTIGATION MUIR Determining age, growth, spawning success, and life history of fish; emphasis of marine species of the Pacific. POPULATION DYNAMICS MUIR Fundamentals of population growth, mortality and equilibrium. Consideration of mathematical models developed for various animal populations, including man. COMPARATIVE INVERTEBRATE PHYSIOLOGY VAN WEEL Life processes with emphasis on marine invertebrates. SEMINAR IN MARINE ZOOLOGY STAFF Reports on research or reviews of literature. 51 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 259 692 SEMINAR IN FISHERIES BIOLOGY MUIR Investigations and literature pertaining to fisheries biology; stress on problems relating to pelagic fisheries of the Pacific. 699 DIRECTED RESEARCH STAFF Directed research and reading in various fields of zoology. 732 FISHERIES MANAGEMENT MUIR Methods of estimating vital statistics of fish populations. Optimum sustainable yields and management problems, particularly of marine fisheries. 52 260 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 University of Houston Houston, Texas The University of Houston offers extensive course work in geology, the other basic sciences, and mathematics; but does not offer courses specifically in marine science except in support of the other fields. However, arrangements can be made for students who prepare themselves in the basic disciplines at Houston to take specialized courses and initiate thesis research at estab- lished marine laboratories. Since the University of Houston is particularly well located for studies of coastal sediments, emphasis is placed on instruction in sedimentation, sedimentary petrography, and invertebrate paleontology. DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY Instructional Staff: (for courses listed below) Paul H. Fan, Ph.D., Professor Harvey Blatt, Ph.D., Asst. Professor Vernon E. Briard, Ph.D., Lecturer Robert Greenwood, Ph.D., Assoc. Professor Gene Ross Kellough, M.S., Lecturer J. Robert Moore, III, M.S., Lecturer E. H. Rainwater, M.S., Lecturer Anthony Reso, Ph.D., Lecturer Adam Thomas, B.S., Lecturer DeWitt C. Van Siclen, Ph.D., Chairman §& Assoc. Prof. Degrees Offered: Bachelor of Science and Master of Science Courses Offered: 333 GEOMORPHOLOGY Fan 335 INVERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY Reso 431 EARTH PHYSICS Briard SS 436 460 639 660 670 680 682 - 683 686 690 692 694 696 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 INTRODUCTORY MICROPALEONTOLOGY PRINCIPLES OF STRATIGRAPHY MARINE GEOLOGY GEOCHEMISTRY AIR-PHOTO GEOLOGY SEDIMENTATION SANDSTONE PETROGRAPHY CARBONATE PETROGRAPHY TECTONICS ADVANCED INVERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY ADVANCED MICROPALEONTOLOGY PALEOECOLOGY ADVANCED STRATIGRAPHY For Information Contact: Dr. DeWitt C. Van Siclen Chairman, Department of Geology University of Houston 3801 Cullen Boulevard Houston 4, Texas 54 261 Kellough Fan Moore Greenwood Thomas Blatt Blatt Blatt Van Siclen Reso Rainwater 262 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Humboldt State College Arcata, California The marine science program at Humboldt State College offers instruction and research in marine fisheries, physical, chemical and biological oceanography as well as the marine aspects of zoology, botany, and ecology. Project research is under way in the areas of water pollution, atomic waste disposal in the sea, water quality and flushing action of Humboldt Bay, as well as oceanographic and biological studies of the waters off the Humboldt coast. Present facilities include saltwater aquaria, water chemistry laboratory, ichthyology laboratories, zoology and botany classrooms and laborator- ies. A 40-foot research vessel equipped with standard oceanographic and biological instrumentation is also available. A marine sciences laboratory with a modern saltwater system will be constructed at Trinidad, California, in 1963-64. DIVISION OF NATURAL RESOURCES Marine Fisheries and Oceanography Instructional Staff: Ernest O. Salo, Ph.D., Chairman,. Division of Natural Resources, Associate Professor of Fisheries John W. DeWitt, M.S., Coordinator of Fisheries, Associate Professor of Fisheries George H. Allen, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Fisheries Richard L. Ridenhour, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Fisheries James A. Gast, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Oceanography Degrees Offered: Bachelor of Science in Fisheries Master of Science in Fisheries Courses: Fisheries 125 FIELD PROBLEMS STAFF Individual work on specific problems involving marine fisheries and oceanography. 132 COMMERCIAL FISHERIES RIDENHOUR Enumeration, dynamics and age and growth of fish populations. 55 136A, 136B. 143 220 225 290 298 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 263 ICHTHYOLOGY ALLEN Evolution, Distribution, migration, anatomy and physiology of fishes. Classification of groups that are of economic and recreational importance. PROBLEMS IN WATER POLLUTION AND DeWITT SANITATION BIOLOGY Scope, magnitude, nature and significance of water re- sources and pollution. Sources and nature of common pollutant materials. Detection, surveillance, and abatement of water pollution. ADVANCED PRINCIPLES OF FISHERIES STAFF MANAGEMENT New and advanced theories, principles and techniques in fisheries management. ADVANCED FIELD PROBLEMS STAFF Directed field experience in individual problems. THESIS STAFF SEMINAR IN FISHERIES MANAGEMENT STAFF Oceanography . 100 101 102 GENERAL OCEANOGRAPHY GAST Introduction to general oceanography including the study of the ocean basins of the world; the chemistry of sea water; the causes of the major ocean currents, and the tides and waves. BIOLOGICAL OCEANOGRAPHY GAST, SALO Studies of the basic biological production of the sea including theory and use of Carbon 14 and other radio- active tracers; qualitative and quantitative determin- ations of plankton production including analysis of the non-conservative elements involved. PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY GAST Physical processes of the seas including theory and practice of current determinations, theory of waves and tides, distribution of variables in the sea and analysis of bottom sediments. 56 264 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 103 CHEMICAL OCEANOGRAPHY GAST Determination of various constituents including some of the minor elements of importance in the physical, chemical, and biological processes of the sea. Biology 40 ELEMENTARY BIOMETRICS RIDENHOUR, SALO Statistical methods as used in the study of biological populations. DIVISION OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES Instructional Staff: William M. Lanphere, Ph.D., Chairman, Division of Biological Sciences Warren J. Houck, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Zoology Fred Telonicher, A.B., Professor of Zoology William C. Vinyard, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Botany Degrees Offered: Bachelor of Arts degree in Biology Master of Arts degree in Biology Bachelor of Arts degree in Botany Bachelor of Arts degree in Zoology Courses: Biology 101 MARINE ECOLOGY TELONICHER, HOUCK The habits, classification, development, and adaptations of marine life, with particular reference to the ecology of the Humboldt coast. 199 INDEPENDENT STUDY STAFF 299 INDEPENDENT STUDY STAFF 112 INTRODUCTION TO PHYCOLOGY VINYARD Comparative morphology, taxonomy and ecology of the freshwater and marine algae. 57 a NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 265 199 INDEPENDENT STUDY STAFF 212 ADVANCED PHYCOLOGY VINYARD Taxonomy, life histories, and relationships of the marine algae of the Pacific Coast. 299 INDEPENDENT STUDY STAFF Zoology 112 INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY TELONICHER A study of animals without backbones, with special reference to the natural history and classification of the animals of the seashore. 199 INDEPENDENT STUDY STAFF 212 ADVANCED MARINE BIOLOGY STAFF An advanced course dealing with problems in marine ecology, classification, and life histories. 299 INDEPENDENT STUDY STAFF For Information Contact: Dr. Ernest 0. Salo Chairman, Division of Natural Resources Humboldt State College Arcata, California 58 266 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 The Johns Hopkins University Baltimore 18, Maryland DEPARTMENT OF OCEANOGRAPHY The Johns Hopkins University offers a broad program of advanced study and research in physical, chemical and biological oceanography. Facilities shared with the affiliated Chesapeake Bay Institute in- clude modern chemical and biological laboratories, instrument development laboratory and shop, dark room, drafting and data re- duction facilities. and library; the Annapolis field laboratory, where research vessels are docked, has an instrument laboratory, chemical preparation room, wood- and metal-working shop, storage and maintenance facilities. A new oceanography building on campus is scheduled for com- pletion in 1964. Additional space will permit extension of staff activities into geological oceanography and air-sea interaction studies. Funds have been obtained to build a 150-ton catamaran-hulled research vessel. Instructional Staff: Donald W. Pritchard, Ph.D., Professor of Oceanography, Chairman. of the Department and Director of Chesapeake Bay Institute (physical oceanography; estuarine dynamics) Raymond B. Montgomery, Sc.D., Professor of Oceanography (physical oceanography) James H. Carpenter, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Oceanography (chemical oceanography) Blair Kinsman, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Oceanography (physical oceanography; wind waves) Walter Rowland Taylor, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Oceanography (biological oceanography) E. Dixon Stroup, M.S., Lecturer and Research Staff Assistant (physical oceanography) Degrees Offered: Master of Afts in Oceanography Doctor of Philosophy in Oceanography 59 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 267 Courses: Courses 303, 601-602, 616 and 624 are offered in alternate years with 603, 605-606, 611-612 and 626. The latter are among the courses available in 1963-64. General: 301 INTRODUCTION TO OCEANOGRAPHY -GENERAL STROUP A broad description of the marine environment including characteristics of sea water and theories of ocean currents. An elementary presentation especially for students in science and engineering; not applicable toward a minor in oceanography for the Ph.D. degree. 611-612 SEMINAR IN OCEANOGRAPHY STAFF Required of all students in the department. 614 ASPECTS OF MARINE GEOLOGY FOR OCEANOGRAPHERS PRITCHARD Directed reading and conference course. 615 RESEARCH PROBLEMS IN OCEANOGRAPHY STAFF Independent research for the Ph.D. dissertation. Open to candidates for the Ph.D. degree. Physical Oceanography 601-602 PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY MONTGOMERY Both geographic and hydrodynamic aspects of ocean- ography are stressed. Topics: instruments; relief of the ocean floor; observed distributions of temperature, salinity and currents; physical properties of sea water; heat and light; scalar and vector fields; kinematics; hydrostatics; momen- tum dynamics; vorticity dynamics; viscosity; Ekman's studies of currents; eddy flux; map projections. Practice is provided in analysis of oceanographic data. 605-606 WAVES AND TIDES KINSMAN Theory of surface and internal waves; wave forecasting; transformation of waves in shallow water. Tide theory; analysis and prediction of tides and tidal currents. 628 ADVANCED WIND WAVE THEORY KINSMAN Modern theories of wind wave generation, dissipation and energy transfer on the ocean surface. 60 268 626 603 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 ESTUARINE OCEANOGRAPHY PRITCHARD Physical and chemical properties of estuarine waters, including the kinematics and dynamics of motion. Classi- fication of estuaries by geomorphological and oceanographic parameters. ADVANCED THEORETICAL OCEANOGRAPHY PRITCHARD A review of the current literature on the theoretical aspects of physical and meteorological oceanography. Chemical Oceanography 624 625 CHEMISTRY OF SEA WATER CARPENTER The composition of sea water; the carbon dioxide system; nutrients; laboratory work dealing with the chemical methods of analysis in routine use in oceanography; assembly and correlation of chemical data. ADVANCED CHEMICAL OCEANOGRAPHY CARPENTER Detailed examination of the chemical and physico-chemical aspects of the nutrient systems, the interaction between the bottom and overlying water, and of minor constituents. Review of modern analytical methods with limited laboratory work. Biological Oceanography 303 616 MARINE ECOLOGY TAYLOR General survey of the populations in marine and estuarine waters. The relationships of physical, chemical and biological factors of the environment to these organisms is discussed. Limited field work included. Permission of instructor required for undergraduate students. BIOLOGICAL OCEANOGRAPHY TAYLOR Consideration of the sea and estuaries as biological environments. Emphasis is placed on marine microbiology, especially phytoplankton and zooplankton. Selected topics in algal physiology and nutrition, biochemistry of photo- synthesis, primary productivity in marine waters, and bottom communities and their relation to the plankton are discussed. The course is designed for students intending to pursue advanced studies in the biological or chemical phases of oceanography. 61 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 269 620 ADVANCED BIOLOGICAL OCEANOGRAPHY TAYLOR Directed reading and discussion of selected topics from current literature. 623 MARINE MICROBIOLOGY TAYLOR Studies of marine and estuarine microorganisms including bacteria, fungi, and unicellular algae such as dino- flagellates and diatoms. Included are discussions of the morphology, taxonomy and certain aspects of physiology, biochemistry, nutrition and bioluminescence of these or- ganisms, Laboratory and field work emphasize isolation and culturing techniques that are unique to the study of marine microorganisms. A wide variety of pertinent courses is available in other departments, including meteorology, fluid mechanics, mechanics of perfect fluids, mechanics of viscous fluids, turbulence, mechanics of gravity waves, and geophysical fluid mechanics, all in the ‘Department of Mechanics; limnology and properties and behavior of water, in the Department of Sanitary Engineering and Water Resources. For Information Contact: Susan S. Raup Assistant to the Chairman Department of Oceanography Johns Hopkins University Baltimore 18, Maryland 62 270 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Louisiana State University Baton Rouge 5, Louisiana Louisiana State University does not offer courses in marine science at its Baton Rouge campus. Summer courses in marine biology at Gulf Coast Research Laboratory, Ocean Springs, Mississippi, are offered to LSU students. Coastal Studies Institute The Coastal Studies Institute is not an academic department. Its research activities are oriented toward geographic, geologic, biologic, and ecologic basic investigations in various parts of the world. To a very limited extent advanced graduate students may be provided field experience necessary for doctoral degrees in academic departments. Areas of interest are likely to start in water no more than 5 fathoms deep and to extend inland only as far as land may be characterized as "'coastal."' More detailed information may be obtained from the Director, Coastal Studies Institute, LSU, Baton Roge 3, Louisiana. 63 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 271 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge 39, Massachusetts Graduate education in oceanography is centered in the Department of Meteorology and the Department of Geology and Geophysics, but many pertinent subjects are offered by other M.I.T. departments. Students may also take subjects offered by Harvard University under the cooperative arrangements existing between the two institutions. Close scientific cooperation is maintained with the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution and several of their senior scientific staff hold part-time appointments at M.I.T. Arrangements may usually be made for students to use the excellent experimental facilities and research vessels at Woods Hole when this is desirable. Special summer courses and summer research appointments are offered by the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution on a competitive basis. Those interested in these opportunities should write to the Director of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts. DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS Instructional Staff: Robert R. Shrock, Ph.D., Professor and Head of Department Columbus O'D. Iselin, D.Sc., Professor (part-time) of Oceanography William S. Von Arx, Sc.D., Professor of Physical Oceanography Dayton E. Carritt, Ph.D., Professor of Chemical Oceanography Ely Mencher, Ph.D., Professor (part-time) of Geophysical Oceanography William H. Dennen, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Mineralogy and Physical Geology John W. Winchester, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Geochemistry John W. Kanwisher, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Biophysics Degrees Offered: Master of Science in Oceanography Doctor of Philosophy in Oceanography Courses: 12.60 OCEANOGRAPHY I STAFF Introduction to different aspects of the oceans and their relations to the atmosphere, solid earth, and marine life. Lectures varying from term to term and given by staff members from both M.I.T. and the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. (Hersey, Iselin, Kanwisher, von Arx) 64 272 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 12.611 CHEMICAL OCEANOGRAPHY I CARRITT Study of the chemical systems in the oceans; the composition of sea water; the density-chlorinity- salinity relationships; the carbon dioxide system; the nutrient systems; dissolved gases; the routes and rates of material and energy transfer between hydrosphere, biosphere, and geosphere. Discussion of the methods of measurement of the dissolved substances in sea water. 12.612 SEMINAR IN CHEMICAL OCEANOGRAPHY Readings in the contemporary literature and discussion of several topics chosen to fit the backgrounds, fields of study, and interests of the participants. Topics in which chemical data are used in the interpretation of natural processes in the sea, such as carbon 14 dating in marine sediments in sea water; exchange of carbon dioxide (and other gases) across the sea surface; rates of physical, biological and geological processes in the oceans as inferred from chemical data; discussion of chemical species in natural fresh and salt waters. The following courses in geology and geophysics are recommended by the Department for work towards a degree in oceanography: 12.011 MINERALOGY I DENNEN 12.012 MINERALOGY II DENNEN 12.14 PETROLOGY FAIRBAIRN 12.15 PETROLOGY LABORATORY FAIRBAIRN 12.301 PHYSICAL GEOLOGY DENNEN 12.302 HISTORICAL GEOLOGY MENCHER 12.308 SEDIMENTATION AND STRATIGRAPHY I MENCHER 12.309 SEDIMENTATION AND STRATIGRAPHY II ° MENCHER 12.583 SEDIMENTOLOGY SEMINAR sn SHROCK, MENCHER 12.811 GEOCHEMISTRY I WINCHESTER 12.812 GEOCHEMISTRY II WINCHESTER 12.82 | SPECTROCHEMICAL ANALYSIS DENNEN 65 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Pile 12.831 ELEMENTS OF GEOPHYSICS I GREENEWALT, MADDEN 12.832 ELEMENTS OF GEOPHYSICS II GREENEWALT, MADDEN 12.833 GEOPHYSICAL LABORATORY GREENEWALT For Information Contact: Dr. Robert R. Shrock Head, Department of Geology and Geophysics Room 24-302 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge 39, Massachusetts DEPARTMENT OF METHOROLOGY Instructional Staff: Henry G. Houghton, Sc.D., Professor and Head of Department Jule G. Charney, Ph.D., Professor Victor P. Starr, Ph.D., Professor Delbar P. Keily, S.B., Associate Professor Norman A. Phillips, Ph.D., Associate Professor George Veronis, Ph.D., Associate Professor (part-time) Degrees Offered: Master of Science in Oceanography Doctor of Philosophy in Oceanography Doctor of Science in Oceanography Courses: 19.67 PLANETARY FLUID DYNAMICS CHARNEY Discussion of fluid dynamical problems on the planetary scale with examples drawn from the atmosphere, the oceans and the interior of the earth. Convectively driven circulations in rotating systems and high-speed computational methods for the solution of the governing equations. 19.83T PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY HOUGHTON Structure and physical properties of the oceans. Methods of measurement and an outline of the observational information. Dynamics of oceanic current systems. Wind currents, waves and tides. 66 35-377 O—64——19 274 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 19.84 DYNAMIC OCEANOGRAPHY STARR, PHILLIPS Hydrodynamics of planetary fluid flow. Restatement of various principles of classic fluid mechanics in a form useful in oceanography with special emphasis on the Coriolis and other effects of the earth's rotation. Classic theories of Ekman and others for ocean currents, and the energy balance for the oceans. 19.89 SPECIAL PROBLEMS IN OCEANOGRAPHY STAFF Reading, consultation, and original investigation on oceanographic problems. The following courses in meteorology are regularly taken by students of oceanography: 19.003 ELEMENTARY METEOROLOGY I AUSTIN 19.22 METEOROLOGICAL INSTRUMENT KEILY 19.34 STATISTICAL METHODS IN METEOROLOGY LORENZ 19.35 STATISTICAL PROBLEMS IN METEOROLOGY LORENZ 19.44 SYNOPTIC METEOROLOGY II SANDERS 19.51 SYNOPTIC LABORATORY I SANDERS 19.601 INTRODUCTION TO THEORETICAL METEOROLOGY PHILLIPS 19.62 DYNAMIC METEOROLOGY I LORENZ 19.64 DYNAMIC METEOROLOGY II STARR 19.72 PHYSICAL METEOROLOGY HOUGHTON The following courses in other departments are considered pertinent to the Department's program in oceanography: 18.60 INTRODUCTION TO FLUID MECHANICS BENNY 18.62 | HYDRODYNAMIC STABILITY AND TURBULENCE - LIN 1.65 FREE SURFACE FLOW IPPEN 1.681 EXPERIMENTAL HYDROMECHANICS HARLEMAN 1.682 EXPERIMENTAL HYDROMECHANICS HARLEMAN 1.683 | EXPERIMENTAL HYDROMECHANICS HARLEMAN 67 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 275 For Information Contact: Dr. Henry G. Houghton Head, Department of Meteorology Room 24-514 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge 39, Massachusetts 68 276 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 University of Miami Coral Gables 46, Florida INSTITUTE OF MARINE SCIENCES The Institute embraces both the Marine Laboratory, which conducts research in marine science, and the Department of Marine Science, which provides academic instruction. The Laboratory employs a 176- foot converted cargo vessel, a 78-foot research vessel, a 36-foot catamaran, and several small motor vessels. Other facilities include extensive laboratory space, the Marine Biological Museum, a large library, etc. Training is offered primarily to graduate students although a few strictly undergraduate courses are taught. Students who show re- search ability and meet the necessary requirements may take part in investigations being carried on as part of the Marine Labora- tory's program. Instructional Staff: EGENE CORCORAN, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Marine Biochemistry CESARE EMILIANI, Ph.D., Research Associate Professor of Marine Geology ; LEONARD GREENFIELD, Ph.D., Research Assistant Professor HOMER W. HISER, Ph.D., Research Associate Professor of Meteor= ology and Head, Meteorological Research Laboratory CLARENCE P, IDYLL, Ph.D., Professor of Marine Biology and Chairman, Division of Fishery Sciences EDWIN S. IVERSEN, Ph.D., Research Assistant Professor ALBERT C. JONES, Ph.D., Research Assistant Professor FRITZ F. KOCZY, Ph.D., Professor of Marine Sciences, Chairman, Division of Physical Sciences CHARLES E. LANE, Ph.D., Professor of Marine Sciences SAMUEL P. MEYERS, Ph.D., Research Associate Professor HILARY B. MOORE, Ph.D., Professor of Marine Biology and Assist- ant Director of the Marine Laboratory CARL H. OPPENHEIMER, Ph.D., Research Associate Professor HARDING OWRE, Ph.D., Research Assistant Professor C. RICHARD ROBINS, Ph.D., Research Associate Professor and Chairman, Department of Marine Sciences GENE A. RUSNAK, Ph.D., Research Associate Professor F. G. WALTON SMITH, Professor of Oceanography and Director of the Institute of Marine Science GILBERT L. VOSS, Ph.D., Research Professor of Marine Biology and Chairman, Division of Biological Sciences ROBERT H. WILLIAMS, Ph.D., Professor of Botany and Marine Sciences WARREN WISBY, Ph.D., Research Associate Professor 69 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 277 Degrees Offered: Master of Science in Fisheries, Marine Biology and Oceanography Doctor of Philosophy in Fisheries, Marine Biology and Oceanography Courses: Fisheries G501. FISHERY BIOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT I The science of fishery biology; methods of appraisal and investigation of populations of aquatic animals of com- mercial and game importance; fishing methods; catch statis- tics; the sampling of fish and invertebrate populations; theory and procedures in tagging and in age and growth studies. G502. FISHERY TECHNOLOGY Preservation of fish; tests of quality; processing and transportation of fishery products. G521. SALIWATER POLLUTION TECHNOLOGY Methods of biological, chemical, and physical analysis of saltwater bays and estuaries for industrial and other pollu- tion. The principal types of pollution and their effects upon marine life, with emphasis on the shellfish and scale fish populations. Preventive and corrective measures. The following courses are open only to graduate students. 602. FISHERY SEMINAR 604. FISHERY BIOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT II Continuation of Fishery 501. Studies of growth; migrations; life histories; natural fluctuations in abundances and dynamics of exploited populations; management of fisheries. 605. POPULATION ENUMERATION AND DYNAMICS Advanced theory and methods of estimating the sizes of popu- lations of invertebrates and fishes; effect of fishing on the abundance and yield from animal stocks. 671,672,673,674,675. ADVANCED STUDY IN FISHERIES Supervised reading and study in areas of special interest to advanced students. 70 278 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 681,682. FISHERY RESEARCH Advanced research. Research 600,700 toward master's thesis or doctoral dissertation. Marine Biology 204. INTRODUCTION TO MARINE BIOLOGY Introduction to the biology of the common marine animals and plants of the shore, coral reefs, and open ocean. Nature of the environment. Economic applications, including com- mercial fisheries, and relations to other marine sciences. Laboratory study and field observations of subtropical marine organisms from diving helmets, shore collecting and dredging. 504. GENERAL MARINE BIOLOGY Anatomy, classification, and identification of marine organisms, mainly as typified by Florida examples. The mechanism and physiology of reproduction, respiration, feeding, and locomo- tion. Parasitism, symbiosis, and other aspects of the natural history of marine organisms. Study of the literature of current research in marine biology. 512. PHYCOLOGY The morphology, taxonomy, physiology, and ecology of marine algae including phytoplankton. 531. MARINE MICROBIOLOGY Taxonomy, physiology and ecology of marine microorganisms. Biochemical considerations and economic significance. 541. MARINE BIOCHEMISTRY Biochemistry of organisms, water and sediment in the marine environment. Lecture, 3 hours; demonstrations. The following courses are open only to graduate students. 602. MARINE BIOLOGY SEMINAR 621. TAXONOMY OF MARINE INVERTEBRATES The classification, anatomy, and life histories of marine in- vertebrates. Detailed studies of a selected group from material collected in the Florida area. Lecture, 2 hours: laboratory, 4 hours; field trips. 71 622 e 623. 625. 631. 634. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 ECOLOGY OF MARINE ANIMALS Types of environment in the ocean, with special reference to shallow tropical seas; the relation of distributions to the physical and chemical environment; effects of environmental changes; breeding cycles; plankton and food chains, causes of population fluctuations. Application of ecological tech- niques to local problems. INVERTEBRATE EMBRYOLOGY Early development of invertebrates including the proto- chordates, life histories, larval stages, and metamorphoses of the principal types and their evolutionary significance; larval adaptation, methods and techniques. BEHAVIOR OF MARINE ORGANISMS Sensory physiology; acuity and sensitivity of marine organisms, and their sensory adaptation to various marine environments. Sound production and its significance in communication; social behavior; predator-prey relationships. Field trips will stress comparative behavior of local species. PLANKTON The drifting organisms, the influence of environment factors upon them, their place in the conomy of the sea and fresh- water habitats, and their relation to fisheries. PHYSIOLOGY OF MARINE ORGANISMS Osmotic regulation, behavior, feeding, metabolism, nerve and muscle function, endocrines, blood chemistry, excretion. 671,672,673,674,675. ADVANCED STUDY IN MARINE BIOLOGY Supervised reading and study in areas of special interest to advanced students. 681,682. MARINE BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH 686. Advanced research. BIOLOGY OF MARINE FISHES Special emphasis on tropical species. Field work devoted to individual research in food habits, development, growth, be- havior, physical and chemical tolerances, parasites, and physiology of local fishes. 72 279 280 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 687. SYSTEMATICS OF MARINE FISHES Classification and evolution of the major groups of fishes, with emphasis on the family level and higher. Current re- search and literature on modern groups. Speciation, zoo- geography, methods. One credit problem in directed research and methods on local marine species optional. Research 600, 700 toward master's thesis or doctoral dissertation. Oceanography 203. INTRODUCTION TO OCEANOGRAPHY An introduction to the physical nature of the ocean, its topography and circulation. Chemical nature of ocean water. Bottom deposits. Relation to biological, geographical, geo- logical and economic problems, including fisheries. 501. GENERAL OCEANOGRAPHY Physical properties and chemical composition of sea water, and relationships to activities of plants and animals; main features of the physics of the oceans; quantitative chemical and physical methods in the laboratory; use of oceanographic instruments in the field. - 511. DESCRIPTIVE OCEANOGRAPHY Theory of oceanographic measurements; preparation and direction of cruises; description of water masses in the ocean parti- cularly the Gulf of Mexico, the Caribbean Sea and the equatorial Atlantic; the current system of the ocean. 531. RADAR METEOROLOGY The essential fundamentals of radar; the operational and re- search uses of radar meteorological data, their derivation from radarscope interpretation, and actual radar operation. 533. DYNAMIC METEOROLOGY The thermodynamic and hydrodynamic principles for the under- standing of the physical behavior of the atmosphere and its motions. 541. GEOCHEMISTRY Distribution of chemical elements and significant compounds in nature, and their major and minor cycles. Geochemical processes in the lithosphere, the atmosphere, and the ocean. The chemical interrelations between organisms and their en- vironment. 73 543. 551. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 P81 GEOPHYSICS The physical properties of the interior of the earth, with emphasis on seismology, magnetism and gravimetry. The inter- relation between land, ocean and atmosphere. Lecture, 3 hours; seminar, 1% hours. Prerequisite: Geology 101, Physics 235, and permission of instructor. MARINE GEOLOGY Geological aspects of the oceans and their basins. Marine processes and features including sedimentation, erosion, shorelines, bottom topography, and geochemistry considered in relation to their present-day significance and the inter- pretation of the geological past. 581,582. SUPERVISED PROJECTS Students engaging in certain approved field activities, such as active participation in expeditions under proper super- vision, may register for credit. The following courses are open only to graduate students. 601. 602. 603. 610. 621. 622. MARINE SCIENCE SEMINAR OCEANOGRAPHY SEMINAR SPECIAL WORK Special work to enrich the student's background according to qualification requirements. CHEMICAL OCEANOGRAPHY Ocean chemistry; relation to hydrodynamical, physical, meteor- ological, geological, and biological problems. Special methods in quantitative determination of inorganic and organic con- stituents. DYNAMIC OCEANOGRAPHY Starting from principles of mechanics, dynamics and thermo- dynamics, deductions are made relating to the movement of the water of the ocean. TIDES AND WAVES General wave equation and the theory of tides; special appli- cation to all wave types in the ocean, including seiches and internal waves; prediction of waves, origin and decay of waves. 74 282 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 630. ADVANCED SEDIMENTATION Advanced studies in the processes and products of sedimenta- tion with special emphasis upon the mechanics of sediment transport, deposition and subsequent modification. Includes studies of texture, structures and composition of ancient and modern sediments. 671,672,673,674,675. ADVANCED STUDY IN OCEANOGRAPHY Supervised reading and study in areas of special interest to advanced students. 75 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 283 University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMITTEE ON OCEANOGRAPHY Work in oceanography at the University of Michigan is not concentrated in a single department; student progress is super- vised by the Interdepartmental Committee on Oceanography, which has cognizance over work toward advanced degrees and determines requirements for each student on an individual basis. The members of the Committee are: John C. Ayers, Ph.D., Research Oceanographer, Chairman D. C. Chandler, Ph.D., Professor of Zoology E. W. Hewson, Ph.D., Professor of Meteorology J. T. Wilson, Ph.D., Professor of Geology F. C. Michelson, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Naval Architecture Research and training in aquatic sciences is given by the Departments of Botany, Civil Engineering, Engineering Mechanics, Environmental Health, Fisheries, Geology, and Zoology, divisions of Ichthyology and Malacology of the University Museum, and by the Great Lakes Research Division of the Institute of Science and Technology. Also on campus and participating in research and training are the Institute for Fisheries Research (Michigan Depart- ment of Conservation), the Great Lakes Commission (an Interstate agency), the U.S. Bureau of Commercial Fisheries, and the Great Lakes Fishery Commission (a U.S.-Canada agency). The Great Lakes Research Division has three research vessels of 114 feet, 50 feet, and 34 feet used for research and training. DEPARTMENT OF ZOOLOGY Instructional Staff: John C. Ayers, Ph.D., Research Oceanographer C. F. Powers, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Zoology J. L. Hough, Ph.D., Professor of Geology W. P. Graebel, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Engineering Mechanics F. C. Michelson, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Naval Architecture Courses: 443 LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY Lectures on the complex of environmental conditions which effect the biotic assemblages in the world's aquatic habitats. Emphasis on the modern concept that fresh and marine waters are essentially similar. 76 284 444 445 446 526 527 531 675 676 313 479 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 FIELD INVESTIGATIONS IN LIMNOLOGY Limnological studies of local lakes and streams. Interpretation of the interaction of environmental factors and the biota. THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN APPLIED LIMNOLOGY Lectures on modern theories relating to the study of aquatic ecosystems. Laboratory work includes field trips, use of limnological equipment, and methods of sampling, enumerating, and identifying organisms. OCEANOGRAPHY LABORATORY Discussion and laboratory dealing with selected topics in physical, chemical and biological oceanography. ADVANCED STUDIES IN LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY Discussion. lectures, and laboratories on special topics in aquatic research. A. Dynamics B. Plankton C, Coastal and Estuarine Processes D. Other EXPERIMENTAL LIMNOLOGY Lecture, discussion, and laboratory on experimental methods of studying aquatic phenomena under both laboratory and field conditions. ADVANCED OCEANOGRAPHY CURRENT PROBLEMS IN LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY Discussion of current concepts and problems. CURRENT PROBLEMS IN LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY Continuation of 675. OCEANOGRAPHIC TECHNIQUES LIMNOLOGY The study of lakes and streams, with stress on the physical, chemical, and biotic factors which determine their biological productivity. 77 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 985 579 ADVANCED LIMNOLOGY The study of lake metabolism and aspects of energy transfer through the aquatic ecosystem. Emphasis is placed on the role of algae and bacteria, with some work on zooplankton and benthic fauna. 677 CURRENT PROBLEMS IN LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY E.M. 921 SEMINAR IN OCEANOGRAPHY For Information Contact: Dr. John C. Ayers Great Lakes Research Division University of Michigan 1069 North University Building Ann Arbor, Michigan 78 286 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 U. S. Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, California DEPARTMENT OF METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY The Naval Postgraduate School is a naval university for the advanced formal education of Naval Officers. The school is located about a mile east of downtown Monterey on the site of the former Del Monte Hotel. Modern classroom and laboratory buildings have been constructed and are situated on a beautifully landscaped, pleasant campus. The Department has laboratory facilities equipped with modern instru- mentation, access to computing facilities, and is in the process of ac- quiring a 63-foot research vessel. Instructional Staff: WILLIAM DWIGHT DUTHIE, Ph.D., Professor of Meteorology, Chairman GLENN HAROLD JUNG, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Oceanography WARREN CHARLES THOMPSON, Ph.D., Professor of Oceanography JACOB BERTRAM WICKHAM, M.S., Associate Professor of Oceanography Degrees Offered: Bachelor of Science, Master of Science Doctor of Philosophy in Meteorology and Oceanography Courses: Mr-120(C). INTRODUCTION TO METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY Distribution of the properties of the atmosphere and the oceans; the mean pattern of the general circulation and the seasonal and short-term variations from the mean; methods of predicting atmospheric and oceanographic con- ditions. Oc-110(€). INTRODUCTION TO OCEANOGRAPHY A survey course treating physical and chemical properties of sea water, marine biology, and submarine geology; the heat budget of the oceans; water masses and the general circula- tion; currents, waves, and tides. Oc-211(A). OCEAN WAVE THEORY Various solutions of the hydrodynamical equations of motion for surface and internal waves, with particular attention to short gravity waves and their properties; generation of waves by wind; empirical and theoretical wind-wave spectra. 79 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 287 Oc-212(A). TIDES AND TIDAL CURRENTS Theories of the astronomical tides; the tide-producing forces; tidal oscillations in ocean basins; geographical variation of the tides; analysis and prediction of tides; tidal datum planes. Meteorological tides. Seiches. Tidal currents. Oc-213(B). SHALLOW-WATER OCEANOGRAPHY Types and characteristics of continental shelves, coasts and beaches; wave processes in shallow water; littoral currents and storm-tides. Oc=-214(B). MARINE ENVIRONMENTS The oceanography of partially enclosed water bodies; of estuaries, fjords, straits, river mouths, and harbors; and of enclosed seas. Oc-230(A). SPECIAL TOPICS IN OCEANOGRAPHY The mechanics of simple water waves; ocean-wave spectra, statistical properties of ocean waves, wave forces, and wave pressures; the movement of ships in irregular seas; tides, tidal currents, and the forces associated with them; sea-water transparency and underwater visibility. Oc-240(B). DESCRIPTIVE OCEANOGRAPHY Properties of sea water; water masses, currents and three- dimensional circulation in all oceans; distribution of temperature, salinity and oxygen; temperature-salinity rela- tionship. Oc-243(A). DYNAMIC OCEANOGRAPHY Turbulence and diffusion in the ocean; boundary layer flow; stability; dynamical models for the general circulation of the ocean and for special regions. Oc-310(B). GEOLOGICAL OCEANOGRAPHY Physiography of the sea floor, especially the continental shelf and slope, coral reefs, submarine canyons, and sea- mounts; marine processes that have shaped the ocean basins and coasts; character and distribution of sediment types and rates of deposition; origin of the ocean basins. Oc-330(A). MARINE GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS Physical and engineering properties of marine sediments; geographical distribution of marine sediments; types of continental shelves and harbors; deposition and erosion 80 288 Oc-410(B). Oc-510(B). Oc-612(B). Oc-613(B). Oc-640(B). Oc-650(C). NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 on the sea floor; current scour around objects on the bottom; biological fouling organisms, distributions of foulers, and rates of fouling. BIOLOGICAL OCEANOGRAPHY Plant and animal groups in the oceans; character of the plankton, nekton, and benthos; marine biological environ- ments; oceanographic factors influencing populations; the effect of organisms on the physical-chemical properties of sea water; organisms responsible for boring, fouling, sound and light production, and sound scattering. CHEMICAL OCEANOGRAPHY Chemical composition of sea water and sea ice; determin- ation and distribution of salinity, density, dissolved gases, and plant nutrients; production of fresh water from sea water. ARCTIC SEA ICE Arctic geography and oceanography; sea-ice observations, formation, properties, growth, deformation and disintegra- tion; ice drift in response to winds and currents. ARCTIC SEA ICE AND ICE FORECASTING Lectures same as in Oc-612(B). Laboratory exercises on ice drift and ice growth. OCEAN THERMAL STRUCTURE Reviews variation of ocean temperature structure and pro- cesses involved; techniques in forecasting thermal structure illustrated by laboratory exercises; practice in developing forecast methods from actual air and sea data. OCEANOGRAPHIC FORECASTING Prediction of ocean transports and advective effects from the atmospheric wind field using the hydrodynamical equa- tions and digital computations; prediction of long-term variations in oceanographic conditions using methods of cross-correlation and spectrum analysis. OPERATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHY Applications of oceanography in ASWEPS, Arctic, submarine, weather, and other Navy operations; radar propagation. For Information Contact: Bureau of Naval Personnel Washington 25, D. C. 81 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 289 New York University New York 53, New York DEPARTMENT OF METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY Current research projects in which students participate include research in ocean waves, air-sea boundary processes, solar radiation balance, turbulent dye diffusion, the large scale ocean circulation, and the equatorial Atlantic. Extensive analogue and digital computing facilities are available, such as a CDC 1604, BECKMAN 210 and smaller units. A sixty-five foot research ship, the KYMA, equipped with AC and DC power, radar, loran, gyrocompass, fathometer, Doppler navigator, deep sea winch, BT winch, dye diffusion gear, skin diving equipment, and data telemetry electronics is used for oceanographic investigations. Applications for graduate assistantships and graduate fellowships are available on request. Instructional Staff: JAMES E. MILLER, M.S., Professor of Meteorology, Chairman of the Department GERHARD NEUMANN, Dr. Rer. Nat., Professor of Oceanography WILLARD J. PIERSON, JR., Ph.D., Professor of Oceanography JEROME SPAR, Ph.D., Professor of Meteorology RICHARD M, SCHOTLAND, Sc.D., Associate Professor of Meteorology BENJAMIN DAVIDSON, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Meteorology KATSUYUK!| OOYAMA, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Meteorology ANDREW F. BUNKER, M.A., Adjunct Professor of Meteorology SILVIO SIMPLICIO, M.S., Adjunct Professor of Meteorology ALBERT ARKING, Ph.D., Adjunct Assistant Professor of Meteorology Degrees Offered: Master of Science in Oceanography Doctor of Philosophy in Oceanography Undergraduate Courses: INTRODUCTION TO THE GEOPHYSICAL SCIENCES | AND II An historical, descriptive, and physical survey of the earth as a planet, the interior and crust of the earth, the oceans, and the atmosphere. Fundamental concepts and methods of the geophysical sciences. Laboratory includes techniques of meteorological and oceanographic observation. DYNAMIC METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY | AND II Thermodynamics and hydrodynamics of the atmosphere and ocean. Radiation. The equations of fluid motion on a rotating earth. Convection. Wind, waves, currents, and tides. Turbulence in the air and sea. Boundary layer problems. 82 35-377 O— 6490 290 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 DESCRIPTIVE METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY | AND 11 The average state of the oceans and the atmosphere. World climates. General circulation of the air and sea. Geography and topography of the continents and ocean basins. Properties and distribution of the major air and water masses. Inter- actions between the sea and the air. THEORETICAL GEOPHYSICS (Not to be given until 1964-1965.) Theory of elastic and hydrodynamic wave motions in the earth, sea and air. CLIMATOLOGY (Not to be given after 1963-1964.) Factors controlling climate, statistical methods of climatology, climates of the continents and oceans. INTRODUCTION TO OCEANOGRAPHY (Not to be given after 1963-1964.) The fundamental principles of oceanography including methods of observation. Elements of dynamical oceanography, ocean currents, waves, and tides. Survey of the stratification and the general circulation of the oceans and of the most important adjacent seas; relation of physical oceanography to meteorology and marine biology. APPLIED METEOROLOGY | AND 11 (Not to be given after 1963-1964.) Application of meteorological principles to weather forecasting for aviation, industry, and the general public. STATISTICAL METHODS IN THE GEOPHYSICAL SCIENCES (Not to be given until 1964-1965.) Applications of statistical methods to problems in meteorology, oceanography, and other branches of geophysics. Graduate Courses: THE PLANET EARTH The average state of the lithosphere, hydrosphere, and atmosphere. The shape of the earth. Energy sources and exchanges. General circulation of the atmosphere and the oceans. Interactions and boundaries between lithosphere, hydrosphere, and atmosphere. Air masses and water masses. The climate of the atmosphere and of the oceans. Paleoclimatology. 83 3S al NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 -PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY Ocean basins and sea bottom. Physical and chemical properties of sea water. Sound and radiation in the oceans. Inter- action between the ocean and the atmosphere. Exchange of heat and water between sea and air. The sea surface as a hydro- dynamic interface. LABORATORY WORK IN OCEANOGRAPHY (given at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution and on the New York University research vessel.) Practical work with the more common oceanographic instruments such as Nansen bottles, bathythermographs, reversing deep-sea thermometers, sea samplers, current meters. OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTRUMENTS AND METHODS OF ANALYSIS Demonstration, description, and theory of instruments used to obtain oceanographic data. Methods of evaluation of records. - Presentation and analysis of data. WAVE MOTIONS IN THE ATMOSPHERE AND IN THE OCEAN Theory of atmospheric and ocean waves and of large perturbations in the westerlies of temperature latitudes and in the tropical easterlies. Effect of the spheroidal shape of the earth. Tides. METHODS OF THEORETICAL METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY Meteorological and oceanographic fields. The equations governing these fields and their solutions. Boundary-value problems and eigenvalue problems in oceanography and meteorology. Incompress- ible and compressible flows. The theory of bores and pressure jumps. Theory of atmospheric and oceanic oscillations. Viscous flows. The diffusion of atmospheric and oceanic properties. GEOPHYSICAL RANDOM PROCESSES Applications of the theory of random processes to turbulence, wind-generated ocean waves, large scale atmospheric motions, short- and long-range weather forecasting, geomagnetic activity, microseisms, and radar storm detection. (Alternates with Analysis and Forecasting of Ocean Waves - spring term 1964, 1966...) GEODYNAMICS The dynamics of geophysical systems with special emphasis on the atmosphere and oceans. Atmospheric thermodynamics. The hydro- dynamic equations for a rotating earth. 84 291 292 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 STATISTICAL METHODS IN METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY Fundamental methods in statistical analysis. Climatological statistics. Application of statistical methods to weather forecasting and to research in meteorology and oceanography. SPECIAL TOPICS IN OCEANOGRAPHY Review of recent work on selected problems in oceanography. DYNAMIC OCEANOGRAPHY Dynamics of ocean currents. Conditions in stratified water. The circulation of the ocean. Ocean surface waves. Seiches. Tidal waves. Internal waves. ESTUARINE HYDROGRAPHY AND FLUSHING PROBLEMS Physical and chemical properties of the water masses of bays, estuaries, and other coastal regions. Dynamics of water move- ments. Diffusion and turbulence in natural bodies of water. Exchange of water with the open sea. Mixing of water masses and problems of water pollution. ANALYSIS AND FORECASTING OF OCEAN WAVES Discussion of modern methods for the analysis and prediction of the state of the sea surface. (Spring 1963, 1965...) OCEANOGRAPHIC ASPECTS OF MAINTENANCE OF BEACHES, HARBORS, AND MARINE STRUCTURES Application of information gained from oceanographic research, including ocean waves, currents, tides, storm tides, and other sea-level changes, to beach erosion problems, off-shore oi] drilling, and harbor and marine structures. DISPERSION OF POLLUTANTS IN THE ATMOSPHERE AND THE OCEANS Fundamentals of meteorology, oceanography, and climatology as applied specifically to the dispersion of pollutants in the biosphere. The analytic principles of atmospheric propagation, diffusion, and deposition of weapon test debris and reactor effluents are treated. Oceanographic diffusion of materials and its implications for safe disposal of radioactive wastes are explored. 85 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 293 THE OCEANS Application of the principles of physical and dynamical oceanography to the individual oceans and their special problems. Description of the various oceans and seas. OCEANOGRAPHIC FIELD RESEARCH Practical work at sea with standard oceanographic instruments such as Nansen bottles, reversing thermometers, bathythermo- graphs, current meters, bottom samplers, and specially designated equipment. ANALYSIS OF OCEANOGRAPHIC DATA Processing of oceanographic observations. Methods of evalua- tion of records. Presentation and analysis of physical and chemical observations. SELECTED PROBLEMS IN OCEANOGRAPHY Discussion and review of modern work in oceanography. RESEARCH METHODS IN METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY Lectures and applied work on such topics as selection and delimitation of the research problem, bibliographic research, preliminary experiments, controls and tests, the research record, statistical methods, and the writing of the final report. RESEARCH IN OCEANOGRAPHY Candidates for the master's degree in oceanography meet regularly with the staff advisers to whom they are assigned to report on the progress of their master's thesis. ADVANCED RESEARCH IN OCEANOGRAPHY Candidates for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy who have passed the preliminary examinations in oceanography meet regularly with the staff advisers to whom they are assigned to report on the progress of their doctoral dissertations. 86 294 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 The following are related courses in meteorology frequently taken by students of oceanography: WEATHER ANALYSIS ATMOSPHERIC RADIATION ATMOSPHERIC PHYSICS ATMOSPHERIC TURBULENCE WEATHER PREDICTION RAD | OME TEROROLOGY THE ATMOSPHERES OF THE PLANETS PHYSICS OF THE UPPER ATMOSPHERE TROPICAL METEOROLOGY SEMINAR Lectures, group discussion, and reports on modern developments in meteorology and oceanography, by the staff, graduate students, and visiting specialists. For information contact: Prof, James E. Miller Chairman, Department of Meteorology and Oceanography New York University New York 53, New York 87 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 295 State University of New York Maritime College Fort Schuyler, New York 65, New York Marine science training at S.U.N.Y. includes the use of a modern Oceanography lab equipped with common oceanographic instruments such as Nansen bottles, reversing sea thermometers, bathythermographs, etc. Ample practice in taking oceanographic observations is offered during cruise periods aboard the training ship EMPIRE STATE IV. SCIENCE DEPARTMENT Instructional Staff: MEIR H, DEGANI, Sc.D., Professor, Chairman of the Department CHARLES THOR, M.S., Associate Professor Degrees Offered: Bachelor of Science (Meteorology and Oceanography) Courses: 302 OCEANOGRAPHY DEGANI The fundamental principles of static oceanography; physical and chemical properties of sea water; topography and composition of the ocean bottom. Survey of dynamic oceanography, waves, currents, and tides. 303 PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY DEGAN! The ocean basins. The 3-dimensional distribution of physical and chemical properties of sea water and their periodic and aperiodic changes. Propagation of sound and electromagnetic waves. Ice in the sea. 4O2 DYNAMIC OCEANOGRAPHY THOR Basic hydrodynamic equations. Theory of currents in a homogenous and nonhomogenous ocean. Basic principles of general oceanic circulation. 406 WAVES ; THOR Interaction between the ocean and the atmosphere. Surface, tidal and internal waves. Analysis and forecasting of ocean waves. Use of wave forecasting in ship routing. 88 296 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 408 INSTRUMENTS AND OBSERVATION DEGANI Theory and design of oceanographic instruments. Collection and evaluation of data. Practical work in several of the common instruments such as Nansen bottles, reversing sea thermometers, etc. L1OE DEGANI Investigation of problems in oceanography of special interest to the merchant marine. For further information contact: Dr. M. H. Degani Chairman, Science Department State University of New York Maritime College Fort Schuyler New York 65, New York NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 297 University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, N.C. There is no separate department offering work toward a degree in oceanography; however, a student may specialize in the marine sciences in the departments of botany, geology, or zoology. Facilities available for student training in marine research include: standard botany, geology, and zoology laboratories at Chapel Hill; coastal laboratory at Morehead City with research library, research collections, a 47-foot diesel powered research vessel, and 4 skiffs and run-abouts with outboard motors. Research is being carried out on the following subjects: life history, ecology, and taxonomy of marine and estuarine crustaceans, fishes, and mollusks; oceanographic and primary productivity studies of sounds and estuaries; laboratory studies of influence of environmental factors upon meristic structures of developing fishes; clay mineral, heavy mineral, and size studies of bottom sediments; geomorphic development of coastal features; foraminifera of coastal waters. Degrees Offered: None in oceanography. Master's and doctor's degrees in botany, geology, and zoology. DEPARTMENT OF BOTANY: Instructional Staff: M. H. HOMMERSAND, Ph.D., Assistant Professor Courses: 114. ALGAE HOMMER SAND 300. RESEARCH IN ALGOLOGY HOMMERSAND 312. SPECIAL TOPICS IN ALGOLOGY HOMMERSAND DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY: Instructional Staff: ROY L. INGRAM, Ph.D., Professor, Chairman JOSEPH ST. JEAN, Ph.D., Associate Professor Courses: 106. INVERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY ST. JEAN 90 298 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 UeiLIbe WALZ 6 247. 285. 288. 389. SEDIMENTARY ROCKS CLAY MINERALOGY SEDIMENTATION ADVANCED INVERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY MICROPALEONTOLOGY RESEARCH IN PALEONTOLOGY DEPARTMENT OF ZOOLOGY: Instructional Staff: Courses: 106. 108. 109. 146. 206. 209. AUS 6 SSNs 395%. 340. 341. JENNER, Ph.D., Professor COSTELLO, Ph.D., Kenan Professor STIVEN, Ph.D., Assistant Professor GENERAL INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY GENERAL ECOLOGY AQUATIC BIOLOGY MARINE ECOLOGY ADVANCED INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY ADVANCED MARINE ECOLOGY RESEARCH IN INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY RESEARCH IN HYDROBIOLOGY RESEARCH IN MARINE ECOLOGY RESEARCH IN GENERAL ECOLOGY 91 INGRAM INGRAM INGRAM ST. JEAN ST. JEAN ST. JEAN JENNER STIVEN JENNER JENNER JENNER COSTELLO JENNER JENNER JENNER JENNER STIVEN NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 299 INSTITUTE OF FISHERIES RESEARCH at Morehead City: Staff: A, F. CHESTNUT, Ph.D., Director and Professor W. E. FAHY, Ph.D., Associate Professor A. B. WILLIAMS, Ph.D., Associate Professor WILLIAM A, LUND, Ph.D., Assistant Professor WILLIAM JOSEPH WOODS, Ph.D., Assistant Professor H. J. PORTER, Instructor Courses: The Institute, although primarily a research organization, aids in the training of marine scientists by offering research courses in zoology, by directing graduate research, and by providing the facilities of its marine laboratoty. For Information Contact: Chairmen of Departments of Zoology, Botany, and Geology. 92 300 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Northeastern University Boston, Massachusetts DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL SCIENCE: Instructional Staff: BERNARD C. GORDON, M.S. J. ROSSON OVERCASH, Ph.D., Chairman of the Department Degrees Offered: None; oceanography courses can be taken by majors in Courses: U7/ RSL co L7/ BSA5 biology, mathematics, physics, and the social sciences. OCEANOGRAPHY I An introduction to the geology of the ocean basins and the physical and chemical properties of sea water. Special attention is given to the development of ocean currents and the important effects these currents have on the land masses of the world. OCEANOGRAPHY IT Emphasis is placed on the habitat zones and organisms of the sea. Phytoplankton, zooplankton, and nekton are discussed. Attention is given to the growing economic importance of marine resources for the expanding world populations. NOTE: In both courses, field trips are taken to the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute, Boston Fish Pier, and near- by museums. For Information Contact: B, L. Gordon, Department of Natural Science Northeastern University Boston 15, Massachusetts 93 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 301 The Oregon Institute of Marine Biology Charleston, Oregon In affiliation with the University of Oregon Eugene, Oregon The Institute of Marine Biology is located on 100 acres of property along Coos Bay at Coos Head. Marine life is abundant and varied. The number and diversity of habitats accessible within a few minutes" drive of the station, and the fact that most of these have been relatively little altered by man, make rich invertebrate and fish faunas readily available to the student. Commercial fishermen bring unusual catches from deeper water to the station. Over 300 different kinds of marine algae have been listed from the region, and numerous fresh-water algae are also available. The Institute buildings provide dormitories, dining hall, class- rooms, and laboratories, There are six laboratory classrooms, with running salt water, study tables and benches, and lamps. The Institute's basic laboratory equipment is supplemented by equipment from the University campus. A working library is available. The station has a 36 foot vessel for routine collecting in connection with class and research activities. Students occasionally make private arrangements to accompany Charleston fishermen on deep- sea trips. Institutional Staff: (1963) VALENTINE J. CHAPMAN, Ph.D., Professor of Botany, University of Auckland. IAN E. EFFORD, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Fisheries, University of British Columbia. HOWARD M. FEDER, Ph.D., Instructor in Biology, Hartnell College. PETER W. FRANK, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Biology, University of Oregon; Acting Director of the Institute HARRY K, FRITCHMAN, II, Ph.D., Instructor in Biology, Boise Junior College. SHIRLEY SPARLING, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Biology, University of California at Santa Barbara. Degrees Offered: None. The University of Oregon awards credit for all courses, Courses Offered (Summer only): Bi 433. ALGAE. CHAPMAN Structure, function and ecology of representative algae, with emphasis on marine forms. 94 302 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Bi 461,462. INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY. FEDER Survey of representative invertebrate groups, with emphasis on marine forms; morphology, systematics, ecology, and life histories. Bi 476. BIOLOGY OF MARINE ORGANISMS. FRITCHMAN, SPARLING, STAFF An introduction to marine biology for college teachers who have had no firsthand experience in this field. Bi 478. MARINE ECOLOGY. EFFORD An examination of general ecological problems, with special reference to marine invertebrates. Topics will include tidal zonation, patchiness and migration of plankton, zoogeography, community structure, popu- lation control, fouling organisms. Bi 401, 501. RESEARCH Bi 403, 503. THESIS Bi 407, 507. SEMINAR Bi 408. LABORATORY PROJECTS For Information Contact: Director Oregon Institute of Marine Biology Department of Biology University of Oregon Eugene, Oregon NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 303 Oregon State University Corvallis, Oregon DEPARTMENT OF OCEANOGRAPHY The department stresses a broad approach to oceanography in a research and graduate training program which integrates the biological, chemical, geological, geophysical, and physical aspects of marine science. A 30,000 square foot building under construction on the campus will be well equipped for all aspects of research and teaching. A 39,000 square foot laboratory at Newport (56 miles west of the campus) to be constructed during the next few months will house coastal aspects of oceanography as well as several allied sciences and will provide docking facilities for the Research Vessel ACONA. The ACONA will be replaced shortly with a 750=-ton converted vessel. Instructional Staff: WAYNE V. BURT, Ph.D., Department Chairman and Professor, Oceanography JOSEPH W. BERG, Jr., Ph.D., Professor, Geophysical Oceanography PETER DEHLINGER, Ph.D., Professor, Geophysical Oceanography PETER K. WEYL, Ph.D., Professor, Chemical Oceanography JOHN V. BYRNE, Ph.D., Associate Professor, Geological Oceanography GERALD A. FOWLER, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Geological Oceanography HERBERT F. FROLANDER, Ph.D., Associate Professor, Biological Oceanography JAMES E. McCAULEY, Ph.D., Associate Professor, Biological Oceanography RICHARD Y. MORITA, Ph.D., Associate Professor (Joint with Microbiology ) JUNE G. PATTULLO, Ph.D., Associate Professor, Physical Oceanography RICHARD W. SHAFER, Capt. USN (Ret.), Associate Professor, Physical Oceanography ANDREW G. CAREY, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Biological Oceanography HERBERT CURL, Jr., Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Biological Oceanography W. BRUCE McALISTER, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Physical Oceanography CHARLES OSTERBERG, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Chemical Oceanography KTLHO PARK, Ph.D., Assistant Professory, Chemical Oceanography WILLIAM G. PEARCY, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Biological Oceanography LAWRENCE F. SMALL, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Biological Oceanography 96 304 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 WILBUR A. RINEHART, M.S., Instructor, Geophysical Oceanography ROBERT L. SMITH, M.A., Instructor, Physical Oceanography ELIZABETH STRONG, B.A., Instructor, Physical Oceanography BRUCE WYATT, M.S., Instructor, Physical Oceanography Degrees Offered: Master of Science in Oceanography Master of Science in General Science (no thesis required) Doctor of Philosophy in Oceanography Students may specialize in any of the following fields: Geophysics; Physical, Chemical, Biological, or Geological Oceanography Undergraduate Courses: Lower Division: 133. ELEMENTS OF OCEANOGRAPHY PATTULLO Study of the development of the principles of ocean- ography by the men who have been pioneers in the field; background of and contributions by these pioneers; ships and equipment used from Polynesian times to the present. 331. INTRODUCTION TO OCEANOGRAPHY FROLANDER, BYRNE Elective non-technical course designed to give the student broad general background. Emphasis on relationship between oceanography and other fields. Upper Division: 420. GEOPHYSICAL EXPLORATION BERG Physical methods used in mining and oil prospecting, emphasizing geologic interpretation. 431. PHYSICAL LIMNOLOGY SMALL Physical and chemical processes in lakes and rivers; methods of making physical measurements; and some field work. 432, PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY McALISTER Physical processes in ocean and estuaries; some field work. 433, 42h, Yh, Ae, hh. Why, hs, NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 CURRENTS AND WATER MASSES PATTULLO Factors contributing to the origin and preservation of the water masses and currents of the oceans; dis- tribution of variables in the sea. ESTUARINE AND SHORELINE PROCESSES McALISTER A general study of estuarine and nearshore processes. Waves, surf and beach effects, tides and tidal currents; types and mechanism of estuarine circula- tion. BIOLOGICAL OCEANOGRAPHY FROLANDER Physical, chemical, and biological factors charac- terizing the marine environment; factors, controlling plant and animal populations, methods of sampling, identification, and analysis. MARINE PLANKTON FROLANDER Floating plant and animal life in the sea; factors controlling population and production; regional dis- tribution; methods of sampling; identification; nuisance forms. MARINE MEKTON PEARCY Review of the swimming animals of the oceanic zones of the sea, including squid, fishes, and marine mammals; their vertical and horizontal distribution and abundance; food chain relationships, special problems of deep-sea life; methods of sampling. MARINE PHYTOPLANKTON ECOLOGY CURL, SMALL Floating plant life in the sea and estuaries; systematics, and distribution; physiology; popula- dynamics; effects of environmental factors; arti- ficial cultivation; effect upon the environment and position in food webs. MARINE PHYTOPLANKTON PHYSIOLOGY CURL The life processes of plankton algae with special emphasis on energy-capturing processes, mineral nutrition, flotation mechanisms, cell division, and the evaluation of experimental procedures; problems of existence in the open ocean; artificial production of maximum yields. 98 35-377 O— 6421 305 306 46. 480. SEM. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 MARTNE PRIMARY PRODUCTION SMALL A detailed examination of the experimental procedures used in measuring primary biological production. An cpportunity is afforded in acquiring skill in most procedures. Stress is laid on evaluation of experi- mental results and their interpretation. MARINE GEOPHYSICS BERG Marine applications of geophysical methods including seismic, gravity, magnetic and others. COMPUTER APPLICATIONS TO OCEANOGRAPHY RINEHART Fortran language, use of IBM 1620 computer. Appli- cations to marine geophysics, seismology, physical and biological oceanography. Graduate Courses: 930. ool. 2026 561. 565. MARINE MICROBIOLOGY MORITA Micro-organisms of ocean water, their ecology and economic importance. CHEMICAL OCEANOGRAPHY PARK Chemical composition and properties of sea water; standard chemical methods for oceanographers; salinity; pH, dissolved gases, nutrients, carbonate cycle, geochemistry and extraction. . THEORETICAL CHEMICAL OCEANOGRAPHY PARK Dissolved salts, oxygen and carbon dioxide in the sea, photosynthesis; organic matter; biogeochemistry of carbonates; marine corrosion, sorption reaction. GEOLOGICAL OCEANOGRAPHY BYRNE Structure and morphology of the ocean basins; processes of marine erosion and deposition; sediment types and distribution; marine geological methods and applica- tions. Course designed for non-geologists. GEOLOGY OF THE OCEAN BASINS BYRNE Methods of geological and geophysical measurement in the ocean basins; topographic, geologic, and geo- physical nature of the ocean basins and the major features occurring in them, their origin and develop- ment. 99 566. ofl. 212. 213+ 580. 581. 582. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 MARINE SEDIMENTATION BYRNE Equipment and methods of sediment collection; nature and distribution of sediments in the various marine environments; physical and biological pro- cesses affecting sedimentation; chemical deposits; engineering application of marine sedimentation; recent marine sediments as a key to paleoecology. MARINE HYDRODYNAMICS McALISTER Mathematical treatment of motion in the ocean; methods for solving physical problems. UNDERWATER SOUND SMITH Applications of sound transmission; factors affec- ting sound transmission in the sea; uses of sound; active and passive sonar, sofar, Swallow, sediment study, depth determination, navigation. WAVES AND TIDES McALISTER Cause, nature, measurement, analysis and prediction of surface waves, tides and tidal currents; tsunamis; storm surges. THEORETICAL GEOPHYSICS, SOUND TRANSMISSION BERG Fundamental relations between stress-strain, general theory of wave transmission, shallow water and deep water transmission, reflectivity, attenuation. THEORETICAL GEOPHYSICS, EARTH GRAVITY DEHLINGER Internal constitution of the Earth, gravity field and gravity potential of the Earth, Earth ellipsoid, gravity measurements, (sea, land and space), isostasy, reduction of gravity measurements, gravity anomalies, deviations from isostatic equilibrium, convection currents, polar migrations. THEORETICAL SEISMOLOGY BERG Fundamental elastic wave equation and solutions, including body and surface waves; layered half-space problem; effects of gravity, curvature, and viscosity; wave equations and solutions for plates and cylinders, wave propagation in medium with variable velocity. 100 307 308 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 583. EARTHQUAKE SEISMOLOGY DEHLINGER Description of earthquakes; types of earthquakes; a seismograph theory; seismic ray paths; velocity determinations; shallow and deep earthquakes; mag- nitude and energies of earthquakes; locating earth- quakes; microseisms; seismicity. 584. PHYSICS OF THE EARTH DEHLINGER Effects of confining pressure, temperature, time, and solutions on the properties of rocks; the earth and moon in the solar system; source materials and their reliabilities for determining the nature and composition of the earth; composition of the core, crust, and mantle of the earth; processes within the earth with special reference to their effect on earthquakes, isostasy, crustal structure, island arcs, etc. 501. RESEARCH STAFF 503. THESIS STAFF 505. READING AND CONFERENCE STAFF 507. SEMINAR STAFF For information contact: Dr. Wayne V. Burt, Chairman Department of Oceanography Oregon State University Corvallis, Oregon 101 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 309 University of the Pacific Stockton L, California PACIFIC MARINE STATION, Dillon Beach, California Pacific marine station provides opportunities for study and research in marine biology and related fields of science. Facilities include laboratories, library, research museum, darkrooms, and living accommodations. A 38 foot converted landing craft, BIOS PACIFICA, and a 26 foot whaleboat are available. Undergraduate and graduate courses are offered during the summer sessions on a non-matriculation basis. These courses are accepted by many university departments in fulfillment of the requirement for study at a marine station as part of the advanced degree requirements. Usually two formal courses are offered during the seven week summer session, one of which is given by a visiting instructor from another institution. During the academic year there are opportunities for advanced study in problems of marine ecology and invertebrate zoology. Students from other colleges who desire to study at Pacific Marine Station should plan to begin their program by attending classes at the Station during the summer session before taking up academic year residence at Dillon Beach, although formal admission procedures may be deferred until the fall semester. Instructional Staff: JOEL W. HEDGPETH, Ph.D., Director, Professor of Zoology JOHN S, TUCKER, Ph.D., Assistant Director, Assistant Professor of Zoology RALPH G. JOHNSON, Ph.D., Visiting Professor of Paleontology (summer sessions) GILBERT C, HUGHES, III, Assistant Professor of Biological Sciences EUGENE N, KOZLOFF, Ph.D., Visiting Professor Degrees Offered: Master of Science on the basis of a combination major with main campus departments. Courses: Regular Session Courses WA. INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY (Offered in spring semester only). The functional morphology, taxonomy, embryology, ecology, phylogeny and economic importance of the invertebrates. Lectures, laboratory field trips and individual reports. 102 HEDGPETH 310 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 fall e2, ADVANCED INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY (Offered by arrangement). HEDGPETH ZN33e Lectures, conferences, laboratory studies, field trips, individual problems and reports dealing with the invertebrates at an advanced level; course 213 is an intensified examination of selected phyla and may be repeated for credit as subject matter permits. 293, DIRECTED STUDIES STAFF 294. Independent studies in problems of invertebrate zoology or marine ecology, planned with the instructor. Reading knowledge of at least one foreign language, preferably German or Russian is recommended. 895, GRADUATE SEMINAR HEDGPETH 296. Reading, conferences and reports pertaining to a selected field of marine biology. 297, GRADUATE RESEARCH STAFF 298. Advanced investigation in a selected problem in invertebrate zoology or marine ecology. The course may be re-elected as often as progress of- the work warrants. 299. THESIS STAFF By appointment. Summer Session Courses (1963) $112. INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY KOZLOFF, HEDGPETH The functional morphology, taxonomy, ecology and phylogeny of the invertebrates. Lectures, laboratory, field trips and individual reports. $124. MARINE BOTANY HUGHES Morphology, taxonomy and ecology of marine and estuarine algae, fungi, and seed plants with emphasis on the local flora. Lectures, laboratory, field trips, and individual projects. $212. ADVANCED INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY KOZLOFF, HEDGPETH With special reference to marine invertebrates. 103 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 311 Summer courses to be offered in any given year are selected from the following courses according to demand and the interests of visiting faculty members. $110. $126. $127. $135. $137. $138. S145. (Include courses $112, $124, and $212 in this list). AQUATIC ECOLOGY Studies of the interrelationships of organisms and their environment with special reference to the sea, estuaries and fresh waters. Lectures and field trips, individual projects. ANIMAL TAXONOMY Principles of classification, with laboratory and field work on the classification of selected groups of marine invertebrates. ICHTHYOLOGY Studies on the morphology, classification, life histories, ecology and economic importance of fishes with special reference to local species. OCEANOGRAPHY The physics and chemistry of the ocean with special reference to biological significance. Lectures, field trips and problems. MARINE PALEONTOLOGY Lectures, readings and discussions on marine paleoecology and evolution with special reference to local living and fossil assemblages. Field trips. SHORE GEOLOGY AND LITTORAL PROCESSES Topography and sediments of shorelines and coasts: study of the physical processes in the nearshore environment. Lectures, laboratory, field trips. ECOLOGICAL PHYSIOLOGY The life functions of marine organisms with emphasis on their responses to the marine environment. Lectures, laboratory, field trips and special projects. 104 312 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 $195. BIOLOGY SEMINAR Conferences, readings and discussions on selected subjects. $197, INVESTIGATIONAL BIOLOGY STAFF $198. Supervised individual studies on selected biological problems. The course may be re-elected as often as progress in the work warrants. For information contact: Dr. Joel W. Hedgpeth Director, Pacific Marine Station Dillon Beach, California 105 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 313 The Pennsylvania State University University Park, Pennsylvania Advanced degree programs at the University emphasizing the marine sciences stress the theoretical and instrumental analysis and inter- pretation of oceanographic data rather than field investigations. Students are encouraged to take full advantage of the University's outstanding physical facilities: mass spectrometers, x-ray and electron diffraction and fluorescence units, electron microprobe, emission spectrograph and computation equipment are available. Exceptional opportunities are offered students interested in hydrodynamics, acoustics and anti-submarine warfare techniques through the facilities of the College of Engineering and the Ordnance Research Laboratory. Opportun- ities for field work are afforded through cooperative arrangements with coastal marine laboratories. Courses in the marine sciences are offered by the Departments of Geology and Geophysics, Geochemistry and Mineralogy, and Meteorology. Instructional Staff: BARNES, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Geochemistry BATES, Ph.D., Professor of Mineralogy BRINDLEY, Ph.D., Professor of Solid State Technology DUQUET, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Meteorology GRIFFITHS, Ph.D., Professor of Petrology HERZOG, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Geophysics HOWELL, JR., Ph.D., Professor of Geophysics KEITH, Ph.D., Professor of Geochemistry KRYNINE, Ph.0., Professor of Petrology and Sedimentation LUMLEY, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Aeronautical Engineering PANOFSKY, Ph.D., Professor of Meteorology SCHMALZ, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Geology N. WEBER, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Geochemistry e e e TMPrornmneatt= ne ee ° ewrevszIwWrewaowsTt ° Degrees Offered: The University does not offer a program leading to advanced degrees in the marine sciences. Course offerings at the advanced undergraduate (400) and graduate (500 and 600) levels may be credited toward degrees in Geochemistry, Geology, Geophysics, Meteorology and Mineralogy, and advanced degree programs in these fields may be pursued with a strong emphasis in the marine sciences. The University offers Master of Science and Doctor of Philosophy degrees in all of these fields. 106 314 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Advanced Undergraduate Courses: ENGR GSc GSc 431 LLO 456 Graduate Courses: AERO ENG AERO ENG GEOL GEOL 511 512 540 551 DIGITAL COMPUTER PROGRAMMING Principals of programming electronic digital computers; solution of scientific and engi- neering problems using symbolic and algebraic techniques on University computers. MARINE GEOLOGY SCHMALZ Chemical and physical processes affecting topography and sediments of the sea floor. INTRODUCTORY GEOCHEMISTRY KEITH Element and isotope distribution and associations in earth, oceans, groundwater; crystal chemistry; geochemical processes, cycles, measurements, prospecting; biogeochemistry. AERODYNAMICS OF A PERFECT FLUID LUMLEY Euler's dynamic equations, complex potential, conformal transformations, thin airfoils, Biot-Savart law; Prandtl three-dimensional airfoil theory. AERODYNAMICS OF A VISCOUS FLUID LUMLEY Navier-Stokes equations, incompressible and compressible boundary layer theory, jet and wake problems, hydrodynamic stability, turbulence. CHEMICAL OCEANOGRAPHY SCHMALZ Chemical reactions in seawater and at the sea floor related to sedimentation and diagenesis. GEOTECTONICS SCHOLTEN Tectonics principals and elements: nature and development of geosynclines, island arcs, mountain structures, stable masses, cratons, mobile belts. 107 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 315 GEOL 500 SEMINAR ) These equivalent STAFF GEOL 530 SPECIAL TOPICS ) courses are offered STAFF GEOL 600 THESIS RESEARCH) in all departments STAFF GG 502 SEMISMIC INSTRUMENTS HOWELL Characteristics and design of seismometers and seismic recorders. GG 508 TECTONICS HOWELL Seminar in the cause and nature of the principal deformations of the earth. GG 514 ELEMENT DISTRIBUTION IN THE EARTH WEBER Principals and data from studies of phase equilibria, petrology and crystal structure as related to distribution of elements in minerals, rocks and the earth. GG 517 AGE DETERMINATIONS HERZOG Geochemistry of radioactive elements and their daughters; age determination techniques and observations. GG 518 ISOTOPE-RATIO VARIATIONS IN NATURE HERZOG Theoretical basis and observations of isotope fractionation in nature; paleotemperature scale; temperatures of formation of ore deposits and other rocks. GG 522 GEOCHEMISTRY OF AQUEOUS SYSTEMS BARNES, SCHMALZ lonic and molecular equilibria related to stabilities and solubilities of minerals; Eh-pH, Po2-PH relations applied to ground water, seawater, hydrothermal fluids. METEO 507 DYNAMIC OCEANOGRAPHY PANOFSKY Physical properties of seawater; heat balance of the oceans; theory and observations of ocean currents, waves, tides. 108 316 NATIONAL METEO 551 METEO 552 MIN 513 MIN 524 MIN 526 MIN 530 OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 ATMOSPHERIC WAVE MOTION DUQUET From classical and physical hydrodynamics to the numerical prediction of wave motion in a baroclinic atmosphere. ADVANCED ATMOSPHERIC DYNAMICS DUQUET Numerical prediction models, general circulation, thermal and gravitational tides in a spherical shell, and empirical orthogonal functions of statistical forecasting. METHODS OF ANALYSIS OF SEDIMENTS GRIFFITHS Principles and practices used in analyzing sedimentary rocks for size, shape and accessory (heavy) minerals. INTRODUCTION TO SEDIMENTATION KRYNINE STATISTICAL PROBLEMS IN SEDIMENTARY GEOLOGY GRIFFITHS Applications of experimental design, sampling procedures multiple regression and discriminant analysis in solving problems in sedimentary petrography. STRUCTURE, PROPERTIES AND OCCURRENCE OF CLAY MINERALS GRIFFITHS, BATES, BRINDLEY Structure analysis and identification of clay minerals; mineral transformations and behavior; occurrence, genesis and petrography of fine- grained sediments. In addition to the above courses, the University offers a wide variety of courses in Geochemistry, Geology, Geophysics, Meteorology, Mineralogy, Petrology and Sedimentation which are directly applicable to the marine sciences. For information contact: Dr. Richard H. Jahns, Dean College of Mineral Industries University Park, Pennsylvania 109 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC’ PROGRAM—1965 Pomona College Claremont, California DEPARTMENT OF ZOOLOGY Instructional Staff: YOST U. AMREIN, Ph.D., Professor of Zoology, Department Chairman ANDREW TODD NEWBERRY, Doctoral Candidate, Stanford University, under Dr. Donald P. Abbott, Hopkins Marine Station, Pacific Grove, California Degrees Offered: None. Courses: Courses offered are at the Kerckhoff Marine Laboratory, Corona del Mar during the five summer weeks Pomona College contracts with California Institute of Technology for use of the laboratory. $130. $150. MARINE INVERTEBRATES NEWBERRY A study of invertebrates residing in the sea: their phylogenetic relationship, their morphology, and their physiology. Laboratory devoted principally to Pacific Coast types. MARINE ECOLOGY NEWBERRY A study of marine invertebrates as they exist in the field. Discussion of the distribution of each species observed and the factors which may account for these distributional patterns. For Information Contact: Yost U. Amrein, Ph.D. Department of Zoology Seaver Laboratory Pomona College Claremont, California 110 317 318 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 University of Puerto Rico Mayaguez, Puerto Rico INSTITUTE OF MARINE BIOLOGY Instructional Staff: CARLOS AGUAYO, Ph.D., Research Associate LUIS R. ALMODOVAR, Ph.D., Associate Investigator MANUEL DIAZ=-PIFERRER, M.S., Associate Investigator PETER W. GLYNN, M.S., Associate Investigator JUAN GERARDO GONZALEZ, M.S., Associate Investigator FRANK G. LOWMAN, Ph.D., Research Associate JOHN E. RANDALL, Ph.D., Director of Research JUAN A. RIVERO, Ph.D., Director GERMAINE L. WARMKE, M.S., Curator of Mollusks Degrees Offered (in the Biology Department): Master of Science in Biology Courses Offered (upper division and graduate): 417. MARINE INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY GLYNN 452. ICHTHYOLOGY. RANDALL 453. FISHERY BIOLOGY RANDALL 461. MARINE BOTANY ALMODOVAR 470. SPECIAL PROBLEMS IN ZOOLOGY STAFF 495. MARINE ECOLOGY GLYNN 515. PRINCIPLES OF SYSTEMATIC ZOOLOGY AGUAYO 590. SEMINAR STAFF 593. ANIMAL BEHAVIOR RIVERO * NUCLEAR TECHNIQUES IN OCEANOGRAPHY LOWMAN * PLANKTOLOGY GONZALEZ *Course number not yet assigned. 111 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Troy, New York DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY Instructional Staff: SAMUEL KATZ, Ph.D., Professor of Geophysics Degrees Offered: None in Marine Science; the listed course may be applied towards a B.S., M.S., or Ph.D. in Geology, Geophysics, or Geochemistry. Course: T10.60 PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY KATZ Ocean basins; sea water and ice; heat budget and thermal processes; currents, tides, and waves; sea-air boundary effects; transmission of acoustic and electromagnetic radiation; instruments and measurements. 112 319 320 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 University of Rhode Island Kingston, Rhode Island GRADUATE SCHOOL OF OCEANOGRAPHY The Graduate School of Oceanography, in addition to the usual classroom facilities, has a modern, fully-equipped oceanographic laboratory which was completed in 1960. The School also has the use of the TRIDENT, a 180 foot research vessel owned by the University. Research programs in progress involve a wide range of topics in physi- cal, chemical, geological and biological oceanography, including ocean currents, sea water radioactivity as related to circulation studies, dynamics of sedimentation, origin of the sea floor, plankton production and distribution, underwater sound of biological origin, productivity of estuaries and coastal ponds, fishery biology and information retrieval, ecology of marine bacteria and algal antimetabolites. Instruction Staff: an JOHN A. KNAUSS, Ph.D., Dean and Professor CHARLES J. FISH, Ph.D., Professor NELSON MARSHALL, Ph.D., Professor DAVID M. PRATT, Ph.D., Professor ROBERT L. McMASTER, Ph.D., Associate Professor SAUL B. SAILA, Ph.D., Associate Professor JOHN McN. SIEBURTH, Ph.D., Associate Professor JOHN T. CONOVER, Ph.D., Assistant Professor HARRY P, JEFFRIES, Ph.D., Assistant Professor DALE C. KRAUSE, Ph.D., Assistant Professor DAVID R. SCHINK, Ph.D., Assistant Professor THEODORE J. SMAYDA, M.S., Assistant Professor Degrees Conferred: Master of Science in Oceanography Doctor of Philosophy in Oceanography (Both degrees are given with options in physical, chemical, geological, and biological oceanography.) Undergraduate Courses: — 1. GENERAL OCEANOGRAPHY STAFF Introduction to the study of the sea: nature of sea water and its movements, ocean floor and its sediments and char- acteristic plant and animal communities that have evolved in this environment. UNS NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 321 Graduate courses to which qualified upperclassmen are admitted: 201. PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY KNAUSS Basic course covering all aspects of physical oceanography. Physical properties of sea water, heat budget, distribution of variables, dynamics, water masses and general circulation. Waves, tides, history and interrelationships with other marine sciences. 221. CHEMICAL OCEANOGRAPHY SCHINK A study of the processes regulating the composition of sea water, and the distribution of chemical species. The inter- action of marine chemistry with the ocean floor, atmosphere, and marine organisms. 241. GEOLOGICAL OCEANOGRAPHY McMASTER Brief survey of marine geology and its relationships to other marine sciences. Growth and destruction of beaches, physical characteristics of continental terraces and theories as to their origin, major features of the vast ocean basins, such as coral reefs, ridges and deeps, and influence of these fea- tures on currents and life and sources and distribution of marine sediments. 242. PETROGRAPHY OF MARINE SEDIMENTS McMASTER Principles of sedimentary petrology applied to study of recent marine sediments. Major emphasis on methods of an- alysis and presentation of analytical data. Processes that lead to deposition of these sediments and environmental forces acting on them once deposited. 243. SEMINAR IN DEEP-SEA GEOLOGY KRAUSE Class discussion of selected topics in deep-sea geology based on extensive reading in the scientific literature. A research paper by each student and lectures will supplement the dis- cussions. 261. BIOLOGICAL OCEANOGRAPHY PRATT AND FISH Nature of life in the sea; adaptations, patterns of distri- bution, and production of plankton, nekton and benthos, their interrelationships and interaction with the environment. 114 35-377 O—64—_—__22 322 262. 264. 266. 267. 268. 291, 292. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 BENTHOS MARSHALL Bottom environments ranging from the deep ocean to fresh-= water lakes will be considered. Attention will be directed to the organization of biotic communities and their inter- relationships, to trophic dynamics and to critical physical and chemical parameters and exchange processes involving the benthic biota. PHYTOPLANKTON SMAYDA The systematics, ecology and methods of investigation of the pelagic microscopic plants are considered, including their morphology, adaptations, physiology, succession, production, distribution and regional dynamics as influenced by environ- mental factors. ZOOPLANKTON A study of the biology of marine zooplankton, dealing with morphology, adaptation, distribution, physiology, production and interrelationships with other members of the marine biota. MARINE BACTERIOLOGY ; SIEBURTH Present concepts of the distribution, nature, and functions of bacteria and related microorganisms in the marine environ- ment. Methodology will include sampling, culture, taxonomy and study in regard to their physical and physiological ecology. FISHERY BIOLOGY SAILA Biology of fish populations and methods of fishery research, including influence of environmental factors on morphology, physiology, abundance and distribution of fishes, estimation of stocks, growth, aging, mortality, measurement of fish production and theory of fishery regulation. INDIVIDUAL STUDY STAFF Individual study of assigned topics or special problems, involving literature search and/or original investigation, under one or more members of the staff. 115 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 323 Courses for graduate students only: 341. RECENT SEDIMENTARY ENVIRONMENTS McMASTER Concentrated study of the estuarine, littoral and neritic sedimentary environments with primary emphasis on the re- lationships between the sediment properties of each environ- ment and its environmental conditions. 361. ECOLOGICAL CONCEPTS IN MARINE RESEARCH JEFFRIES Advanced course in ecology with emphasis on marine environ- ment. Ecological theory pertaining to population dynamics, energy in ecological systems and the application of quanti- tative biology in oceanography. Application of experimental methods in ecological research. 391. SEMINAR IN OCEANOGRAPHY Seminar reports on problems and current research in various areas of oceanography by students. For Information Contact: John A. Knauss, Dean Graduate School of Oceanography University of Rhode Island Kingston, Rhode Island 116 324 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 San Diego State College San Diego, California DIVISION OF LIFE SCIENCES Instructional Staff: ERIC G. BARHAM, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Zoology RONALD W. CRAWFORD, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Zoology DAVID A. FARRIS, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Zoology WILLIAM McBLAIR, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Oceanography GORDON H. TUCKER, Ph.D., Professor of Zoology Degrees Offered: None - a minor in Oceanography and Aquatic Biology is being developed. Courses: Oceanography 100. THE OCEANS McBLAIR Biological and physical aspects of the oceans and their significance to man; problems of medern oceanography. Biology 111. AQUATIC BIOLOGY CRAWFORD Biological, chemical and physical considerations of inland waters. 112. FISHERY BIOLOGY FARRIS Theory and practices of fishery management. Life histories and biology of important game and food fishes. 113. BIOLOGICAL OCEANOGRAPHY BARHAM A study of benthic and pelagic marine organisms and their environmental parameters. Zoology 112. MARINE INVERTEBRATES TUCKER Identification and study of behavior and life histories of invertebrates of the San Diego region. Frequent collecting trips to the beaches required. WA7/ NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 325 115. ICHTHYOLOGY CRAWFORD Evolution, interrelationships, structure, identification, habits and ecology of fishes. 118 326 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Scripps Institution of Oceanography LaJolla, California DEPARTMENT OF MARINE BIOLOGY Instructional Staff: ANDREW A. BENSON, Ph.D., Professor of Biology DENIS L. FOX, Ph.D., Professor of Marine Biochemistry CARL L. HUBBS, Ph.D., Professor of Biology PER F. SCHOLANDER, M.D.» Ph.D., Professor of Physiology BENJAMINE E. VOLCANI, Ph.D., Professor of Microbiology CLAUDE E. ZOBELL, Professor of Marine Microbiology FRANCIS T. HAXO, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Biology : (Chairman of the Department) RALPH A. LEWIN, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Biology kekketk GALEN E. JONES, Ph.D., Assistant Research Microbiologist MARTIN W. JOHNSON, Ph.D., Professor Emeritus EDWARD W. FAGER, Ph.D., D. Phil,, Associate Professor of Biology Degrees Offered: Master of Science in Marine Biology Doctor of Philosophy in Marine Biolology Upper Division Courses: 114, MARINE VERTEBRATES HUBBS 121. MARINE MICROBIOLOGY ZOBELL, JONES Methods of studying bacteria and allied microorganisms, with particular reference to their importance as bio=- chemical and geological agents in the sea. 125B. LABORATORY IN ALGAL PHYSIOLOGY HAXO 125C. PHYSIOLOGY OF MARINE ALGAE HAXO Comparative physiology and biochemistry of algae with emphasis on marine problems. 119 199. 222. 226. 227. p52. 260. 285. 299. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Bath SPECIAL STUDIES STAFF Graduate Courses: BIOCHROMES FOX, HAXO Physical and chemical foundations of color manifestation; the chemistry, distribution, metabolism, and significance of pigments occuring in the Living world. MARINE AND COMPARATIVE BIOCHEMISTRY FOX Chemistry of living matter; osmotic adaptations, marine colloids; comparative biochemical and physiological activities of marine organisms; biochemical cycles in the sea; animal pigments. EVOLUTION IN THE MARINE WORLD HUBBS Origin and evolution of sea and its organisms. Migration from and to the sea. Adaptation and speciation in various habitats. Experimental studies on evolution of marine forms. SEMINAR IN EXPERIMENTAL AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY VOLCANI, STAFF SEMINAR IN ADVANCED ICHTHYOLOGY HUBBS LABORATORY IN PHYSIOLOGY SCHOLANDER Research techniques and problems in selected areas of environmental physiology. RESEARCH STAFF Research in such biological fields as: phycology, biophysics, genetics, evolution, microbiology, vertebrate and invertebrate zoology, comparative biochemistry or physiology of marine plants and animals. Students must present evidence of satis= factory preparation for the work proposed. For Information Contact: Dr. Francis T. Haxo Chairman, Department of Biology Seripps Institution of Oceanography LaJolla, California 328 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 DEPARTMENT OF OCEANOGRAPHY Instructional Staff: JOHN D. ISAACS, B.S., Professor of Oceanography FRED B. PHLEGER, Ph.D., Professor of Oceanography and Director of Foraminifera Laboratory NORRIS W. RAKESTRAW, Ph.D., Professor of Chemistry ROGER REVELLE, Ph.D., D. Sc., Professor of Oceanography and Director of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography MILNER B. SCHAEFER, Ph.D., Professor of Oceanography and Director of the Institute of Marine Reseurses FRANCIS P. SHEPARD, Ph.D., Professor of Submarine Geology FRED N. SPIESS, Ph.D., Professor of Oceanography and Director of the Marine Physical Laboratory WARREN S, WOOSTER, Ph.D., Professor of Oceanography ROBERT S. ARTHUR, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Oceanography CHARLES S. COX, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Oceanography EDWARD W. FAGER, Ph.D., D. Phil., Associate Professor of Biology (Chairman of the Department) DOUGLAS L. INMAN, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Geology KLAUS L. HASSELMANN, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Oceanography JOHN A. McGOWAN, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Oceanography MELVIN N. A. PETERSON, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Oceanography PHILIP RUDNICK, Ph.D., Research Physicist, and Lecturer GIFFORD C. EWING, Ph.D., Associate Research Oceanographer and Lecturer JEFFERY D. FRAUTSCHY, B.S., Associate Research Engineer, Lecturer and Assistant Director of the Scripps Institution of Oceano- graphy TJEERD H. VAN ANDEL, Ph.D., Associate Research Geologist, and Lecturer JOSEPH R. CURRAY, Ph.D., Assistant Research Geologist, and Lecturer WILLIAM R. RIEDEL, M.S., Assistant Research Geologist and Lecturer EDWIN L. HAMILTON, Ph.D., Research Associate and Lecturer kekeRkEK MILTON N. BRAMLETTE, Ph.D., Professor Emeritus EDWARD D. GOLDBERG, Ph.D., Professor of Chemistry CARL H. ECKART, Ph.D., Professor of Geophysics CARL L. HUBBS, Ph.D., Professor of Biology MARTIN W. JOHNSON, Ph.D., Professor Emeritus WALTER H. MUNK, Ph.D., Professor of Geophysics FRANCIS T. HAXO, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Biology 121 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 329 Degrees Offered: Master's Degree in Oceanography Because of limited facilities, the Department does not at the present time encourage students who wish to proceed only to the master's degree. Special arrangements can, however, be made if circumstances warrant it. Doctor of Philosophy in Oceanography Upper Division Courses: 110. 110C.. le. 112C. INTRODUCTION TO PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY ARTHUR Physical description of the sea; physical properties of sea water; boundary processes including interaction between sea and atmosphere; principles of dynamics applied to motion and distribution of variables; methods of measurement with demon- stration at sea. INTRODUCTION TO DYNAMICAL OCEANOGRAPHY ARTHUR, COX Mechanics of fluids on a rotating earth; Napier-Stokes equations, boundary layer phenomena, turbulent flows, and wave motion with oceanographic applications. SUBMARINE GEOLOGY SHEPARD, INMAN The topography and sediments of the ocean floor, and their recent history; sedimentary processes as they affect the shore, continental shelf, and ocean floor; comparison between recent sediments and sedimentary rocks; the development of coral reefs. ANALYSIS OF SEDIMENTS CURRAY Lectures and laboratory study of methods of analysis and interpretation of sediments, especially grain-size distribu- tions and composition of the sand=-size fraction. BIOLOGY OF THE SEA An integrated survey course dealing with fundamental aspects of the biological economy of the sea; the explanation of bio= logically associated marine phenomena; and the interrelation of biological, chemical, and physical processes in the envir- onment. MARINE ORGANISMS McGOWAN Laboratory and discussion of the phylogeny, comparative morph= ology, life histories and taxonomy of marine organisms. Emphasis will be placed on plantonic groups. 122 330 113. TOYS}, 118¢c. 119. 123. 199. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 CHEMISTRY OF SEA WATER RAKESTRAW, GOLDBERG Chemical compositon of sea water; physical properties of sea water; biochemical activity in the oceans; marine sedimentation; thermodynamic considerations; history of the oceans; models of oceans from chemical considerations; problems of measuring composition. STATISTICS FAGER Methods of statistical analysis; sampling and design of experiments applicable to marine studies. COMPUTER PROGRAMMING PERRY The logic of computer programming for statistics applications using automatic coding systems; median, mean, range, variance=- covariance, regression, distributions. Especially designed for students in marine geology and biological oceanography. TIME SERIES RUDNICK Correlation functions; linear filtering; applications .to geophysical time series. INTRODUCTION TO MECHANICS OF MARINE SEDIMENTATION INMAN Marine sedimentary processes, including waves, currents and tides, and their effect on sediment transport and the formatian of beaches and other sedimentary structures. SPECIAL STUDIES STAFF Graduate Courses: 210. PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY, GENERAL ARTHUR Dynamics of ocean currents; turbulence; wind currents; atmospheric boundary layer; water masses and circulation of the ocean. WAVES cox Generation and propagation of surface and internal waves; wind waves, swell and surf; wave action on beaches; methods of observation; field work. 123 b i | 217. 219A. 2198. 223 eek. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 331 HYDRODYNAMICS ECKART Application of hydrodynamics to the motion of stratified fluids, such as the atmosphere and oceans. Internal waves, steady currents, and related phenomena. MARINE MICROPALEONTOLOGY BRAMLETTE, PHLEGER, RIEDEL Introductory lectures and laboratory study of the principal groups of marine microfossils, with special emphasis on the applications to problems of oceanography, and paleoceanography. MARINE MICROPALEONTOLOGY BRAMLETTE, PHLEGER, RIEDEL Advanced study of specific groups of microfossils in the marine environments, emphasizing their ecology and stratigraphic applications. SPECIAL TOPICS IN OCEANOGRAPHY STAFF Within the next few years the following subjects will be given: PRINCIPLES OF OCEANOGRAPHIC RESEARCH SYSTEMS SOUND AND LIGHT OF THE SEA POPULATION DYNAMICS ZOOGEOGRAPHY OF THE SEA ADVANCED METHODS OF FISHERIES RESEARCH NUMERICAL ANALYSIS STUDIES OF TURBULENCE AND WAVES LITTORAL PROCESSES TNMAN Study of the physical processes in the nearshore environment, including waves and currents and their effect on the transportation of sediments and the formation of sedimentary features. PETROGRAPHY OF SEDIMENTS VAN ANDEL, BRAMLETTE Lectures and laboratory. Principles of sedimentary petrology; techniques of sediment analysis; microscopic mineralogy, thin section analysis, laboratory analysis; graphical and statistical data processing. 124 3d2 2256 226. 250. 251. 2536 25D. 299. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 MARINE ECOLOGY Behavior, single=species population dynamics, interspecific relationships and environmental factors as they relate to the distribution and abundance of marine organisms. ADVANCED INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY NEWMAN This course will cover the natural history, zoogeography, taxonomy and phylogeny of selected invertebrate groups. Emphasis will be on the broader aspects of current research. Two special problems will be undertaken during the semester, original problems will be encouraged. MARINE SEDIMENTS VAN ANDEL Advanced treatment of special topics in sedimentology; selected examples of sediment research; trends of sediment research and their influence on geological thinking; application of sediment studies to stratigraphy and paleogeography. SEMINAR IN OCEANOGRAPHY STAFF PROBLEMS IN GENERAL AND PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY STAFF Presentation of reports, review of literature, and discussion of current research in general oceanography and physical oceanography. PROBLEMS IN BIOLOGICAL OCEANOGRAPHY STAFF Presentation of reports, review of literature, and discussion of current research in biological oceanography. PROBLEMS IN MARINE GEOLOGY STAFF Origin and structure of ocean basins and continental margins, and their physiographic features. Origin, distribution, interpretation, and methods of study of marine sediments. RESEARCH STAFF Research in one or more of the oceanographic sciences. For Information Contact: Dr. Edward W. Fager Chairman, Department of Oceanography Scripps Institution of Oceanography LaJolla, California 125 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 333 The University of Southern California Los Angeles 7, California In addition to the usual research laboratory facilities, the University of Southern California students have access to the outstanding library and marine biological collections of the Allan Hancock Foundation. Much of the work in marine sciences is made possible through the use of the Hancock Foundation's 110-foot vessel, VELERO IV. Biological research includes ecologic, systematic and biogeographic studies of marine animals and plants. Field investigations are in progress off the southern California coast, and in the Arctic and Antarctic Oceans. Geological research is concentrated in the shallow waters and on sediments of the continental margins with emphasis on quantitative studies of chemi- cal, physical and biological parameters. DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES Instructional Staff: PAUL R. SAUNDERS, Ph.D., Professor and Head LESLIE A. CHAMBERS, Ph.D., Professor, Director of Allan Hancock Foundation E. YALE DAWSON, Ph.D., Professor JOHN L. MOHR, Ph.D., Professor RICHARD TIBBY, Ph.D., Professor JOHN GARTH, Ph.D., Associate Professor OLGA HARTMAN, Ph.D., Associate Professor JAY M. SAVAGE, Ph.D., Associate Professor GERALD J. BAKUS, Ph.D., Assistant Professor RUSSEL L. ZIMMER, M.S., Instructor The following persons do not hold appointments in the Department of Biological Sciences but are Research Associates of the Allan Hancock Foundation and are engaged in marine biological research: JOHN D. SOULE, Ph.D. FRED C, ZIESENHENNE, M.S. Degrees Offered: Master of Science in Biclogy with specialization in Marine Biology Doctor of Philosophy in Biology with specialization in Marine Biology Graduate Courses: 506ab. SEMINAR STAFF Review of current biological literature; assignments in the fields of special interest or research. 126 334 509abL. 510abL. 530ab. 542L. 546L. 550L. 552L. 573L. 580L. 790ab. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY ZIMMER Living animals, particularly marine invertebrates; their habitats, including mud flats, sandy beaches, rocky shores. SPECIAL PROBLEMS IN BIOLOGY STAFF Library or laboratory investigation of research problems in a selected field of biology. SEMINAR IN MARINE INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY STAFF ICHTHYOLOGY SAVAGE Evolution, systematics, ecology, behavior, life history, and distribution of living fishes, including the basic principles of fisheries biology. CRUSTACEAN BIOLOGY GARTH Systematics, morphology, physiology, ecology, life history, distribution, behavior, and experimental use of living crustacea. BIOLOGICAL OCEANOGRAPHY TIBBY Marine environments with reference to the distribution and dynamics of biotic communities. DEEP-SEA BIOLOGY The fauna of the deep-sea below 2000 meters in relation to the various characteristics of the environment. MARINE ECOLOGY BAKUS Interrelationships between marine populations and com- munities and their environments. MARINE BOTANY DAWSON Morphology, anatomy, ecology, physiology, life histories, evolution and distribution of marine plants. RESEARCH STAFF For Information Contact: Dr. Paul R. Saunders, Head Department of Biological Sciences University of Southern California University Park Los Angeles 7, California 127 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 335 DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY Instructional Staff: ORVILLE L. BANDY, Ph.D., Professor THOMAS CLEMENTS, Ph.D., Professor Emeritus GREGORY A. DAVIS, Ph.D., Assistant Professor DONN S. GORSLINE, Ph.D., Associate Professor JACK GREEN, Ph.D., Adjunct Professor Degrees Offered: Master of Arts in Geology with specialization in Oceanography Doctor of Philosophy in Geology with specialization in Oceanography. Upper Division Courses: 460L. DESCRIPTIVE GEOCHEMISTRY GREEN Geochemical structure of the earth; distribution and geochemical behavior of elements in the lithosphere and other geochemical spheres. Lecture and Laboratory. 478L. MICROPALEONTOLOGY BANDY Microscopic fossils; Foraminifera; ostracods, conodonts; classification, common genera, morphology, evolutionary trends; laboratory and field techniques. Graduate Courses: 500. PALEOECOLOGY BANDY Classification of marine habitats; criteria for recognizing paleoecologic conditions; study of changing environments based on fossil assemblages. 510. SEDIMENTARY PROCESSES GORSLINE Origin, transportation, deposition of sediments; conditions modifying sedimentary processes; environments of sedimentation; interpretation of former climatic and physiographic conditions. 128 336 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 SpHL SEDIMENTARY TECHNIQUES GORSLINE Collection of samples; analyses for grain size, gross : fractionation methods; description and interpretation of sediments. 512. OCEANOGRAPHY GORSLINE Chemical and physical properties of sea water; movement of water masses; relation of water characteristics to meteorological factors; relation of marine organisms to water composition. 514. MARINE GEOLOGY _ GORSLINE Origin of ocean basins, characteristics of rock underlying the ocean floor; development of island ares, continental shelves, continental slopes, submarine canyons, coral reefs. 519L. SEDIMENTARY PETROGRAPHY CLEMENTS Application of the microscope to the study of sediments. 550ab. SPECIAL PROBLEMS STAFF Intensive study in one or more of the fields of geology. 560. ADVANCED GEOCHEMISTRY SEMINAR GREEN Selected research problems in elemental abundances and distribution in the geochemical spheres. 578L. ADVANCED MICROPALEONTOLOGY BANDY Microfaunal correlations; stratigraphic sequence of microfaunas; phylogenesis of foraminifera; paleoecology; applied micropaleontology; reports on microfaunas from local and foreign strata. 790ab. RESEARCH STAFF An intensive study of specific problems under the direction of a member of committee of the staff in Geology. For Information Contact: Dr. Donh S. Gorsline Department of Geology University of Southern California Los Angeles 7, California 129 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 337 Stanford University Stanford, California HOPKINS MARINE STATION, Pacific Grove, California Instructional Staff: DONALD P. ABBOTT, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Biology ISABELLA A, ABBOTT, Ph.D., Research Biologist LAWRENCE R. BLINKS, Ph.D., Professor of Biology, and Director ROLF L. BOLIN, Ph.D., Professor of Marine Biology and Oceano- graphy, and Assistant Director CHARLES A. GIESE, Ph.D., Professor of Biology CORNELIS B. VAN NIEL, D.Sc., Herzstein Professor of Biology JOHN H. PHILLIPS, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Biology Degrees Offered: Master of Science in Marine Biology Doctor of Philosophy in Marine Biology Courses (Autumn, winter and spring quarters): Although formal courses will not be offered, the staff will welcome the opportunity to direct work of graduate and under- graduate students in the fields indicated. The tides and weather permit collecting throughout the year, in some cases even more successfully than in the summer. 199h. SPECIAL PROBLEMS STAFF Properly qualified undergraduate students may undertake individual work in the fields indicated under Course 300h. Such studies are intended to introduce the serious student to methods of research. Arrangements must be made by con- sultation or correspondence. 300h. RESEARCH Graduate study involving original work may be undertaken with members of the staff in the fields indicated. MARINE ZOOLOGY ABBOTT Problems connected with the anatomy, taxonomy, development, and ecology of marine invertebrates. 130 35-377 O—64-_—_23 338 100h. 101h. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 PHYSIOLOGY BLINKS Problems of general and cellular physiology, especially of marine plants. Permeability, photosynthesis, and bio-= electric phenomena are especially under study. MARINE FISHES, ECOLOGY BOLIN Morphology, taxonomy, embryology and ecology of marine fishes. Oceanic biology. PHYSIOLOGY GIESE Problems on the physiology of invertebrate animals; photo= biology, especially the effects of ultraviolet light. MICROBIOLOGY VAN NIEL Morphology, taxonomy, and biochemistry of the various groups of micro-organisms. BIOCHEMISTRY AND IMMUNOLOGY PHILLIPS Comparative biochemistry and immunology of -mayine organisms. SUMMER QUARTER Evening Lectures and Seminars These are given by visiting scientists as occasion offers. MARINE ALGAE HOLLENBERG Lectures, laboratory, and field work-on the various classes of algae. Particular attention will be given to the marine algae of the Pacific Coast. NATURAL HISTORY OF MARINE ANIMALS HADERLIE This course provides an opportunity for the student to visit several different types of marine habitats, to become acquainted with about 400 named species of living animals representing most of the known phyla and classes, and to examine more carefully about 50 living forms. Stress is placed upon the adaptations which fit the animals for life in their particular habitats. 131 153h. 169h. 199h. 300h. 136h. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 339 MARINE INVERTEBRATES ABBOTT Survey of the lower marine invertebrates, echinoderms, and protochordates. Emphasis is placed on basic body plan, func- tional anatomy, pattern of development, higher classification, and phylogenetic relationships, rather than on detailed morphology and species identification. GENERAL MICROBIOLOGY VAN NIEL This course will be concerned mainly with the methods of culture, the morphology, general physiology and ecology of representative types of micro-organisms. ECOLOGICAL PHYSIOLOGY GIESE Physiological responses of animals to variations in environ- mental factors and to organisms. Most of the work will deal wil marine invertebrates. SPECIAL PROBLEMS (see above, autum, winter, and spring quarters) RESEARCH (see also above, autum, winter, and spring quarters) Candidates for advanced degrees may work on thesis problems with staff members, in either half of the quarter or during the full quarter. SECOND HALF MARINE INVERGEBRATES (continued) ABBOTT Continuation of Course 111h, covering the molluscs, annelids, arthropods, and allied lesser phyla. While the two courses form a continuous sequence, either half may be taken separately when space permits. GENERAL ICHTHYOLOGY COHEN An introduction to the study of fishes;,including the elements of morphology, taxonomy, embryology, natural history, and principles and techniques of conservation. Commercially important, very common, or spectacularly modified groups of North American fishes are stressed, and local material collected by the class if used in the laboratory. 132 340) 154h. 164h. 199h. 300h. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 GENERAL MICROBIOLOGY (Continued) VAN NIEL In the second half-quarter, the material of Course 153h will be expanded, and special emphasis will be placed on the biochemical properties of micro-organisms, from which the fundamentals of "eOmparative biochemistry” will be derived. Some general methods for the study of biochemical phenomena will be presented. PHYSIOLOGY OF ALGAE BLINKS Lectures and experiments on the physiology of fresh-water epiphytic, marine and brine algae. Osmotic and salt effects, permeability, respiration, pigments, photosynthesis and tropisms are among the topics studied. SPECIAL PROBLEMS (see under First Half) RESEARCH (see under First Half) 133 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 341 University of Texas Austin, Texas INSTITUTE OF MARINE SCIENCE, Port Aransas, Texas The Institute of Marine Science at Port Aransas, Texas is a division of The Main University of Texas at Austin. The permanent staff is primarily concerned with basic research and graduate instruction with an integrated teaching program in Marine Science made up of the course offerings of the Institute and related departments of science and engineering on the main campus. The resident faculty research programs are Ecology, Ichthyology, Microbiology, Geology, and Chemistry. The Institute serves as an outlet to the sea for higher education in the southwestern region through its service program for classes, visiting investigators, and summer students. Also conducted are studies which are basic to the development of the Marine Resources of Texas. Instructional Staff: H. T. ODUM, Ph.D., Director, Lecturer in Zoology, Biological Oceanography Limnology, Ecosystems. E. W. BEHRENS, Ph.D., Lecturer in Geology. Marine Geology, Sedimentation R. J. BEYERS, Ph.D., Comparative Ecology, Microcosms. J. C. BRIGGS, Ph.D., Lecturer in Zoology, Ichthyology, Marine Zoogeography B. J. COPELAND, M.S., Limnology, Pollution Ecology, LLOYD HAMPTON, M.A., Lecturer in Physics, Defense Research Laboratory, Marine Acoustics. C. VAN BAALEN, Ph.D., Lecturer in Botany. Marine Microbiology, Algal Physiology. Degrees Offered: The Master of Science and Doctor of Philosophy degrees are offered in marine sciences in cooperation with main campus Departments of Geology, Microbiology, Zoology, Chemistry, Botany, Physics, and Environmental Health Engineering. Summer Courses: (The Institute of Marine Science is primarily a research organization and offers extensive course work only in the summer.) 382.1 MARINE INVERTEBRATES A Advanced consideration of classification, morphology, development,and natural history of marine invertebrates. 134 342 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 382.2. MARINE MICROBIOLOGY VAN BAALEN Isolation and physiology of marine microorganisms and consideration of their role in marine processes. 382.3. MARINE GEOLOGY BEHRENS Geological processes and methods for exploring the sea floor. Special emphasis on sedimentation in gulf and bay environments. 382.4. MARINE BOTANY Biology of marine plants with special reference to those of the Gulf of Mexico. 382.5. MARINE ICHTHYOLOGY BRIGGS The systematics of fishes, including their major classi- fication, comparative anatomy, embryology, and general distribution. 382.6. MARINE CHEMISTRY Chemical processes in the sea. 481. BIOLOGICAL OCEANOGRAPHY AND MARINE ECOLOGY ODUM Study of communities, populations, and biological processes in Marine environments. Consideration of environmental influences, productivity, biochemical cycles, and conservation. May count as zoology. Lectures, laboratory, field work, and introduction to periodical literature. 680. RESEARCH 680.1. BIOLOGICAL OCEANOGRAPHY, MARINE ECOLOGY, LIMNOLOGY 680.2. MARINE MICROBIOLOGY 680.3. MARINE GEOLOGY 680.4. MARINE BOTANY 680.5. MARINE ICHTHYOLOGY 135 iitntin fa NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 343 680.6. MARINE CHEMISTRY ODUM, HAMPTON, 690. GENERAL MARINE SCIENCE BEYERS, COPELAND An introduction to the science of the sea. Lectures, laboratory, and field work. For information contact: Dr. H. T. Odum Director, Institute of Marine Science Port Aransas, Texas 136 344 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Virginia Institute of Marine Science Gloucester Point, Virginia In affiliation with: College of William and Mary Williamsburg, Virginia University of Virginia Charlottesville, Virginia The Institute, a major research and teaching center in marine science, is located on deep water 30 miles from the mouth of Chesapeake Bay, Facilities include modern permanent laboratory buildings, a research fleet with regular cruises over the con- tinental shelf and an all year round research program. All classwork and graduate study is directed by working scientists in the environment of an active marine research program. Modern laboratory and field instruments are available. Research is being carried on in marine ecology, pollution prob- lems, microbiology, radiobiology, diseases of shellfish, fish life histories, fishery biology, geology, physical oceanography and parasitology. Instructional Staff: WILLIAM J. HARGIS, JR., Ph.D., Dean and Professor of Marine Sciences JAY DONALD ANDREWS, Ph.D., Professor of Marine Science MORRIS LEROY BREHMER, Ph.D., Professor of Marine Science EDWIN BIBB JOSEPH, Ph.D., Professor of Marine Science WILLARD ABRAHAM VAN ENGEL, Ph.B., Ph.M., Professor of Marine Science JOHN LANGILLE WOOD, Ph.D., Professor of Marine Science ROBERT E. LEE BLACK, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Marine Science and Biology PHILIP WYMAN HARRISON, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Marine Science DEXTER STEARNS HAVEN, M.S., Associate Professor of Marine Science GEORGE MOSKOVITS, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Marine Science MAYNARD M, NICHOLS, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Marine Science JOHN JUDSON NORCROSS, M.S., Associate Professor of Marine Science BERNARD CLARENCE PATTEN, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Marine Science MARVIN LEROY WASS, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Marine Science LANGLEY HARRISS WOOD, A.M., Assistant Professor of Marine Science EVELYN CLARE WELLS, M.S., Marine Science Librarian 137 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 345 Associate Instructional Staff: ALFRED R, ARMSTRONG, Ph.D., Professor of Chemistry MITCHELL A. BYRD, Ph.D., Professor of Biology ROBERT L. ELLISON, Ph.D., Professor of Geology, University of Virginia BRUCE W. NELSON, Ph.D., Professor of Geology, V.P.I. WILLIAM W, SCOTT, Ph.D., Professor of Botany, V.P.I. Degrees Offered: Master of Arts in Marine Science from the College of William and Mary Doctor of Philosophy in Marine Science from the University of Virginia Majors in: Biological Oceanography, General Oceanography and Fishery Biology Advanced Undergraduate and Graduate Courses: 401, INTRODUCTORY PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY NICHOLS Physical paroperties of sea water, interaction with the atmosphere, movement of water masses, and dynamics of currents, waves and tides, Special emphasis in the labor- atory will be devoted to techniques and instruments em- ployed in biological, chemical, geological, and physical oceanography. 402. GENERAL MARINE ECOLOGY STAFF Studies of the interactions of biological, chemical and physical variables of the marine environment at the in- dividual, population and community levels; distribition of marine organisms; development of the concept of the marine ecosystem as a generalized open system, 403. PROBLEMS IN MARINE SCIENCE STAFF Supervised projects selected to suit the needs of the advanced undergraduate student. Projects to be chosen in consultation with the hand of the student's major department, the supervising professor and the Dean of the School of Marine Science. Acceptable topic outlines and terminal project reports are required. 138 346 404, 405. 406. 407. 408. 409, 410. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 BIOLOGY OF SELECTED MARINE ORGANISMS ANDREWS, VAN ENGEL, HAVEN Detailed, advanced study of special groups of marine organisms such as Mollusca or Crustacea, which are within the special interests and training of particular staff members, Emphasis on organisms of economic importance such as Balanus, Callinectes, Crassostrea. SYSTEMATICS AND PHYLOGENY HARGIS General consideration of the principles and theories of systematics and phylogeny. Techniques of taxonomy, studies of the historical development of species and higher biological units. MARINE BIOLOGY STAFF A general introduction to marine science including biological, chemical, geological and physical oceano- graphy. BIOMETRY I. NORCROSS Application of biometrical techniques to analysis of biological data. Enumeration statistics, measures of central tendency and dispersion, Analysis of variance and regression analysis. ICHTHYOLOGY JOSEPH A detailed treatment of the biology of fishes including phylogeny and classification, functional morphology, speciation, respiration and reproduction. CYBERNETICS PATTEN Elements of cybernetics, with special emphasis on appli- cation to biological systems: Nature of systems, change, the determinate machine, coupling and feedback, stability, black box problems, constraint, athe Markovian machine, automatic control, topics from information, game and decision theories. MARINE AND FRESHWATER INVERTEBRATES STAFF Classification and identification, adaptation, ecology, life histories. Local marine, estuarine and freshwater forms emphasized. 139 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 347 411. MARINE GEOLOGY NICHOLS, HARRISON Topography and structure of the sea floor, origin of the ocean basins, coral reefs, continental shelves, submarine canyons, depositional environments and sedimentary pro- cesses, 412, MARINE BOTANY STAFF A general introduction to the ecology and systematics of algae and spermatophytes encountered in the marine environ- ment, 413, BIOGEOGRAPHY WASS A survey of biogeographic regions, their geological origin and the paleo- and neo-distribution of representative groups of organisms. Emphasis on marine environments, 415. BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY STAFF A consideration of the chemistry of biological systems, 417. BEHAVIOR OF MARINE ORGANISMS wooD A survey of physiological and ecological correlates of behavior, with emphasis on marine organisms and their environment; a critical review of behavioral theory; electrophysiological demonstrations of the interaction of sensory processes and environmental stimuli. Graduate Courses: 501. MARINE SCIENCE SEMINAR STAFF The organization and presentation of scientific data. Oral discussion and written outlines and critiques of selected seminar topics are required of all students in the department, 502. BIOMETRY II. VAN ENGEL, STAFF Correlation, covariance analysis, multiple regression, and curvilinear regression. 140 348 503. 504, 505. 506. 507. 508. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 ADVANCED PROBLEMS IN MARINE SCIENCE STAFF Supervised research projects selected to suit the needs of the graduate student. Projects to be chosen in eon- sultation with the student's major professor and the Dean of the School, Acceptable research outlines and project reports are required. Training in specific areas such as marine parasitology, epidemiology and pathology of marine organisms, marine productivity, physiology of algae, ex- perimental design, and other subjects which staff members are qualified to teach is also offered. EMBRYOLOGY AND ANATOMY OF MARINE INVERTE- BLACK BRATES The comparative embryology and adult anatomy of local representatives of all major phyla will be considered. Emphasis will be placed on the evolutionary relationships between groups. Experiments to illustrate possible mechanisms of fertilization, cleavage and organ differentiation will be performed, RADIOBIOLOGY BREHMER A study of the principles of tracer techniques, procedures for radio-assay, limitations of tracer methodology, hazards, safe handling pwocedures with particular emphasis on the use of isotopes in marine research. BIOLOGY OF PLANKTON STAFF The structure and dynamics of estuarine plankton communities, with emphasis on the local biota; classification, morphology and ecology of major constituents; planktological methods. MARINE MICROBIOLOGY WOOD, STAFF Morphology, physiology, ecology, taxonomy, methods of isola- tion, cultivation and identification of aquatic microoganisms with emphasis on those from the marine environment. PHYSIOLOGY OF MARINE ORGANISMS BLACK Major physiological processes will be considered. Special attention will be given to those processes in which evolu- tionary trends are apparent. 141 509, 510. 512. 514, 516. 518. 560. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 CHEMICAL OCEANOGRAPHY STAFF Introductory study of chemical processes in marine waters including composition of sea water, nutrients, carbon dioxide systems. POLLUTION BIOLOGY BREHMER Study of the various types of pollutants, domestic and industrial wastes, soils, insecticides, herbicides and radioactive materials and their effects on the marine environment. BIOENERGETICS PATTEN The biological processes of energy transformation: Elementary thermodynamics, photosynthesis, chemosynthesis, metabolish, respiration and trophodynamics. LITTORAL PROCESSES NICHOLS, HARRISON Physical and chemical processes in the nearshore environ- ments including littoral waves, tides, currents, trans- portation of sediments and the formation of sedimentary features. ADVANCED PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY STAFF Dynamics of ocean currents, turbulence, wind currents, waves, water masses and circulation of the ocean. MARINE FISHERY SCIENCE STAFF Principles and techniques; including the theory of fishing, 349 age and growth, methods of defining stocks, catch statistics, description of world fisheries, and life histories of selected species, THESIS Original research in Marine Science or Fisheries Biology. Project to be chosen in consultation with the student's major professor and the Dean of the School. For information contact: Dr. William J, Hargis, Jr. Director Virginia Institute of Marine Science Gloucester Point, Virginia 350 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Walla Walla College College Place, Washington WALLA WALLA COLLEGE BIOLOGICAL STATION Instructional Staff: DONALD F. BLAKE, Ph.D., Instructor in Biology HAROLD G. COFFIN, Ph.D., Professor of Biology, Director of é the Biological Station, Head of the Department of , Biological Sciences , BEATRICE T. EMERY; M.S., Assistant Professor of Biology DONALD W. RIGBY, M.S., Assistant Professor of Biology JOHN F, STOUT, Ph.D., Instructor in Biology Degrees Offered: None Courses: (summer only) 181. INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY RIGBY A study of the invertebrate animals of Puget Sound with emphasis on systematics and natural history. 182. ICHTHYOLOGY STOUT A systematic study of the fishes found in Puget Sound with a survey of the fishes of other waters. 183. MARINE BOTANY EMERY A systematic study of plants found in Puget Sound, with a survey of marine plants from other areas. Field trips by boat among the islands and dredging trips to collect sea weed specimens comprise most of the field work. 187. BIOLOGICAL OCEANOGRAPHY COFFIN A study of the geology, geography, and biology of the ocean. 169. LIMNOLOGY BLAKE A study of the factors responsible for the presence and distribution of animals and plants in fresh waters. For information contact: Dr. Earl Lathrop Department of Biology Walla Walla College College Place, Washington 143 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 351 University of Washington Seattle 5, Washington DEPARTMENT OF OCEANOGRAPHY Instruction Staff: KARL BANSE, Ph.D., (equivalent European degree), Assistant Professor of Oceanography CLIFFORD A. BARNES, Ph.D., Professor of Oceanography LAWRENCE COACHMAN, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Oceanography JOE S. CREAGER, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Oceanography THOMAS S. ENGLISH, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Oceanography RICHARD H. FLEMING, Ph.D., Professor of Oceanography, Chair- man of the Department MEREDITH A. GROSS, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Oceanography STANLEY R. MURPHY, Ph.D., Lecturer in Oceanography; Senior Physicist, Applied Physics Laboratory ERLING J. ORDAL, Ph.D., Professor of Microbiology MARICE RATTRAY, JR., Ph.D., Associate Professor of Oceanography FRANCIS A. RICHARDS, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Oceanography Degrees Offered: Bachelor of Arts, Bachelor of Science, Master of Science, and Doctor of Philosophy in Oceanography Undergraduate Courses: 101. SURVEY OF OCEANOGRAPHY CREAGER, ENGLISH Origin and extent of the oceans; nature of the sea bottom; causes and effects of currents and tides; animal and plant life in the sea. Recommended for nonmajors. 110, 111, 112. LECTURES IN OCEANOGRAPHY FLEMING Weekly lectures, demonstrations, and tours to familiarize students with the subject matter and opportunities in oceanography. To be taken in the first or second year by students majoring in oceanography. May be entered any quarter. 144 352 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 203. INTRODUCTION TO OCEANOGRAPHY FLEMING A description of the oceans and their relation to man; physical, chemical, biological, and geological aspects of the sea; areal distribution and seasonal cycles of properties; currents; factors affecting populations. Demonstrations and some classes abroad ship and in laboratories. ‘360. METHODS AND INSTRUMENTS IN OCEANOGRAPHY VAN HAAGEN Theory and practice of instrumental measurement and sampling in oceanography; shipboard equipment, position finding, selected in- formation on equipment design and properties of materials, cali- bration and observation of the behavior of typical instruments. 390. GENERAL OCEANOGRAPHY BARNES, RICHARDS Physical, chemical, biological, and geological aspects of the oceans. Introductory to all courses in 400 series. 401. GENERAL PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY BARNES Physical properties and processes, interaction with atmosphere, theories and methods involved in ocean currents, waves, and tides. Not open to students who have taken 410. 403. BIOLOGICAL OCEANOGRAPHY BARNES, ENGLISH Marine organisms; biological aspects of life om tje sea' omf;iemce of the environment; principal habitats. 405. GEOLOGICAL OCEANOGRAPHY CREAGER Methods of marine geological exploration; physiography and structure of the ocean basins; processes of sedimentation; sediments in the Marine environment. 410. PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY BARNES Physical properties, processes, and the theory of the distribution of variables in the sea; mass and energy budgets. 411. OCEAN TIDES AND WAVES RATTRAY Cause, nature, measurement, analysis, and prediction of tides and tidal currents and surface waves. 145 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 308 412. OCEAN CURRENTS BARNES Characteristics of currents and of forces that establish and modify them; methods of direct measurement and computation, use of indirect techniques; associated distribution of mass and properties. 415. FUNDAMENTALS OF UNDERWATER ACOUSTICS MURPHY Wave equation in liquids and solids; propagation in inhomogeneous media; exact and approximate solutions related to actual properties of the ocean medium. 416. APPLICATIONS OF UNDERWATER ACOUSTICS MURPHY Characteristics of practical systems utilized in acoustic studies in the ocean, including sound sources and sound detectors. Physical limitations of actual systems. 421, 422. CHEMICAL OCEANOGRAPHY RICHARDS Physical and chemical properties of sea water and marine products; methods of quantitative analysis. 423, 424. CHEMICAL OCEANOGRAPHY LABORATORY RICHARDS Laboratory problems in the analytical and physical chemistry of sea water and marine materials. 440, 441, 442. UNDERGRADUATE SEMINAR FLEMING Reviews of history and literature; description of local waters and applications of oceanography. Required of all majors. 452. SEDIMENTARY PROCESSES GROSS Origin, transportation and deposition of sediments; environments of sedimentation; interpretation of past climatic and physiographic conditions. 453. SEDIMENTARY TECHNIQUES GROSS Laboratory study and statistical analysis of physical properties of sediments; size analysis, texture, composition, porosity, permeability and mass properties; description and interpretation of sediments. 146 35-377 O—64——_24 304 460. 461. 499, NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 FIELD EXPERIENCE IN OCEANOGRAPHY COLLINS Practical work on shipboard and ashore by participation in regular oceanographic operations on the "Brown Boat" and other vessels; chemical, physical, biological, and geological analyses; preparation of reports. (Offered Summer Quarter only.) APPLICATIONS OF OCEANOGRAPHY FLEMING Analysis of special cases involving application of oceano- graphy to practical problems. UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH Research on assigned topics which may involve laboratory work, field work, or literature surveys. Open to qualified seniors. Graduate Courses: Seles 514. 516. Bye 518. 512, 513. MARINE HYDRODYNAMICS RATTRAY Methods for solving problems in physical oceanography. FIELD WORK IN MARINE HYDRODYNAMICS RATTRAY Application of marine hydrodynamics principles to field measurements. (Offered Summer Quarter when demand is sufficient.) WAVES RATTRAY Application of marine hydrodynamics principles to wave motion in oceans. OCEAN CIRCULATION RATTRAY Hydrodynamic theories concerning origin and characteristics of major ocean currents. OCEANOGRAPHY OF INSHORE WATERS BARNES, RATTRAY Theories and techniques of investigation and interpretation of conditions existing in inshore waters with particular reference to mixing and flushing and to areas adjacent to the state of Washington; use of dynamic models. SEMINAR IN PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY BARNES, RATTRAY Lectures, discussions, and field and laboratory work on selected problems of current interest. 519. SZi0h 521. 531. 532. DoS 534. DoD). 536. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 355 INTERACTION OF THE SEA AND ATMSOPHERE Interchange of heat, water, and energy; study of budgets and of mechanisms of exchange. SEMINAR SEMINAR IN CHEMICAL OCEANOGRAPHY RICHARDS Lectures, discussions, and field and laboratory work on selected problems of current interest. ADVANCED PROBLEMS IN CHEMICAL OCEANOGRAPHY RICHARDS Field and laboratory work on selected problems of current interest. SEMINAR IN BIOLOGICAL OCEANOGRAPHY BANSE Lectures, discussions, and field and laboratory work on selected problems of current interest. MARINE MICROBIOLOGY ORDAL Ecology and biochemistry of marine bacteria. ZOOPLANKTON ECOLOGY STAFF Adaptation, modifications, and life histories of animals in the plankton. Evaluation of methods and techniques used in field and laboratory studies. (Offered Summer Quarter only in alternate years beginning 1962, at Friday Harbor, Washington.) PHYTOPLANKTON ECOLOGY STAFF Contemporary problems in marine phytoplankton investigation. Evaluation of methods used in field and laboratory studies. (Offered Summer Quarter only in alternate years, beginning 1962, at Friday Harbor, Washington.) ADVANCED PLANKTON ECOLOGY BANSE Factors controlling the distribution, abundance, and production of plankton organisms, with a consideration of recent methods of sampling and analysis. BENTHOS ECOLOGY BANSE Quantitative consideration of the population of the sea-bed. Discussion of modern methods of sampling and analysis. Factors affecting production. 148 356 SSI Doe 553. S86 556. 600. 700. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 SEMINAR IN GEOLOGICAL OCEANOGRAPHY CREAGER Lectures, discussions, and field and laboratory work on selected problems of current interest. RESEARCH TECHNIQUES IN MARINE GEOCHEMISTRY GROSS Introduction to and evaluation of analytical techniques and instruments applicable to problems of marine geochemistry. RESEARCH TECHNIQUES IN MARINE GEOLOGY CREAGER Planning field programs; selection of equipment and survey procedures; collection, analysis, compilation, and presenta- tion of bathymetric and sediment data; evaluation of techniques and results. MARINE GEOCHEMISTRY GROSS Geochemistry of the oceans and marine sediments. ADVANCED MARINE GEOLOGY CREAGER Contemporary problems in marine geology; concepts supporting or at variance with accepted hypotheses; discussion of recent advances. RESEARCH THESIS Special Courses: X101. 385. SURVEY OF OCEANOGRAPHY STAFF An evening class offered Autumn and Winter Quarters and also a day course during Summer Session, covering the same topics as the regular course. THE WORLD OF WATER FLEMING, SPECIAL STAFF Oceanography and related earth sciences for junior and senior high school teachers; a summer institute for 30 selected teachers sponsored by the National Science Foundation. 149 e NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 307 X380. DESCRIPTIVE OCEANOGRAPHY, THEORIES FLEMING, STAFF AND METHODS A survey of oceanography emphasizing coastal waters and the techniques used in the collection, analysis and presentation of data. For hydrographic surveyors. A contract course with the U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey. 150 308 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 wae eet of Wisconsin Madison 6, Wisconsin A graduate training program in oceanography and limmology now exists at the University of Wisconsin. There is not now a separate department of ocean- ography or marine science. Instead, the training program will extend across department and college lines so as to take advantage of the courses and talent already available. The courses listed represent selected offerings in ocean- ography or closely related subjects. Specialization in a particular basic dis- ecipline will be possible and expected of candidates in the program. Experience at sea or its equivalent is required of all candidates. Research activity includes work on aerial sensing of sea surface phen- omena; migration of fishes; marine sediments, both old and new; marine seismol- ogy; geophysics of the Arctic basin; marine climatology; experimental hydro- dynamics; and physical limmology of the Great Lakes. A new Laboratory of Limnology has been completed and is available for experimental work on oceanographic and limmological problems. Two light air- craft are operated for aerial sensing of radiation over land and water surfaces, and a capability for instrumenting larger aircraft for over-ocean measurements of surface parameters and magnetic field has been developed. Degrees Offered: PH.D. in Oceanography and Limnology Minor in Oceanography for Ph.D. in other fields DEPARTMENT OF AGRONOMY Instructional Staff: JAMES H. TORRIE, Ph.D., Professor Courses: 139. BIOMETRY TORRIE DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING Instructional Staff: ARNO T. LENZ, Ph.D., Professor, Chairman GERARD A. ROHLICH, Ph.D., Professor JAMES R. VILLEMONTE, Ph.D., Professor G. FRED LEE, Ph.D., Assistant Professor - water chemistry PETER L. MONKMEYER, Ph.D., Assistant Professor Courses: 177. | HYDRODYNAMICS MONKMEYER 276. FREE SURFACE FLOW MONKMEYER 5a NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Water Chemistry Program 193. WATER ANALYSIS 205. WATER CHEMISTRY SEMINAR 280. PRINCIPLES OF WATER CHEMISTRY 280. ADVANCED TECHNIQUES OF WATER ANALYSIS DEPARTMENT OF BACTERIOLOGY Instructional Staff: WILLIAM B. SARLES, Ph.D., Professor, Chairman OSCAR M. ALLEN, Ph.D., Professor PERRY W. WILSON, Ph.D., Professor STANLEY G. KNIGHT, Ph.D., Professor 309 HARLYN O. HALVORSON, Ph.D., Professor of Bacteriology and Botany ELIZABETH McCOY, Ph.D., Professor Courses: 120. ADVANCED GENERAL MICROBIOLOGY 125} SOIL MICROBIOLOGY 126. PHYSIOLOGY OF BACTERIA 134. MOLDS, YEASTS AND ACTINOMYCETES 230. jj TAXONOMY AND NOMENCLAUTRE OF BACTERIA DEPARTMENT OF BOTANY Instructional Staff: GRANT COTTAM, Ph.D., Professor RICHARD I. EVANS, Ph.D., Associate Professor JOHNATHAN D. SAUER, Ph.D., Associate Professor Courses: 103. ALGAE 164. PLANT ECOLOGY SARLES, ALLEN ALLEN WILSON, KNIGHT, HALVORSON RAPER McCOY EVANS COTTAM 360 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY Instructional Staff: LEWIS M. CLINE, Ph.D., Professor, Chairman JAMES DORMAN, Ph.D., Visiting Professor ROBERT T. BLACK, Ph.D., Professor ROBERT H. DOTT, Ph.D., Associate Professor ROBERT P, MEYER, Ph.D., Assistant Professor Courses: 109. | GEOMORPHOLOGY BLACK 133. SEDIMENTATION TYLER, DOTT 134. MARINE GEOLOGY DOTT, STAFF 170. MARINE GEOPHYSICS DORMAN 161. GRAVITY AND MAGNETICS STAFF 164. | ELEMENTARY SEISMOLOGY STAFF DEPARTMENT OF METEOROLOGY Instructional Staff: HEINZ H. LETTAU, Ph.D., Professor, Chairman REID A. BRYSON, Ph.D., Professor ROBERT A. RAGOTZKIE, ‘Associate Professor WERNER SCHWERDIFRGER, Ph.D., Professor Courses: 101. #§ GENERAL METEOROLOGY SCHWERDIF EGER 103. | MICROMETEOROLOGY LETTAU 140. DYNAMIC CLIMATOLOGY BRYSON 144, INTRODUCTORY OCEANOGRAPHY RAGOTZKIE 271.* PROGRAMS IN VISCOUS FLOW LETTAU 272.* PROBLEMS OF TURBULENT FLOW LETTAU *Jointly listed in Civil Ingineering and Meteorology Departments. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 361 DEPARTMENT OF ZOOLOGY Instructional Staff: LEMUEL A. FRASER, Ph.D., Professor ARTHUR D. HASLER, Ph.D., Professor JOHN T. EMLEN, Ph.D., Professor JOHN C. NEESS, Ph.D., Professor LOWELL E. NOLAND, Ph.D., Professor WILLIAM G. REEDER, Ph.D., Professor JOSEPH J. HICKEY, Ph.D., Professor of Wildlife G. E. FOGG, Ph.D., Visiting Professor C. He MORTIMER, Ph.D., Visiting Professor D. H. CUSHING, Ph.D., Visiting Professor FERRIS NEAVE, Ph.D., Visiting Professor Courses : 124. LIMNOLOGY HASLER U25\ RCOLOGY OF FISHES HASLER 141. INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY FRASER 138. BIOLOGY OF VERTEBRATES EMLEN, NEESS, REEDER 108. PROTOZOOLOGY NOLAND 126. FIELD ZOOLOGY REEDER | 170. BIOLOGY OF THE PLANKTON FOGG, CUSHING, . MORTIMER 231. #$BIOMETRIC TECHNIQUES HICKEY, NEESS All Departments offer course number 200 for research credit. For Further Information Contact: Robert A. Ragotzkie Department of Meteorology University of Wisconsin Madison, Wisconsin 154 362 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Yale University New Haven 11, Connecticut BINGHAM OCEANOGRAPHIC LABORATORY Instructional Staff: ALYN C, DUXBURY, M.S., Research Associate and Lecturer in Mechanical Engineering ALFRED W. EBELING, Ph.D., Research Assistant, Assistant Curator of Ichthyology, Instructor in Zoology DANIEL MERRIMAN, Ph.D., Director, Associate Professor of Zoology GRACE E. PICKFORD, Ph.D., Research Associate, Associate Professor of Zoology GORDON A. RILEY, Ph.D., Associate Director, Professor of Oceanography (Zoology) PETER J. WANGERSKY, Ph.D., Research Associate Degrees Offered: None Courses: Bingham Laboratory is primarily a research institution. However, the following two courses are offered in marine science: 134. ICHTHYOLOGY A year's course involving classification, life histories, and the principles of fisheries biology. 135. OCEANOGRAPHY A year's course, consisting of an intensive general survey of the history and principles of biology and chemical and physical oceanography. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 363 ALPHABETICAL FACULTY LIST Donald P. Abbott, Stanford Isabella A. Abbott, Stanford Carl W. Adams, U of Hawaii Richard M, Adams, Texas A&M Carlos Aguayo, U of Puerto Rico George H, Allen, Humboldt State College Oscar M. Allen, U of Wisconsid Luis R. Almodovar, U of Puerto Rico Yost U. Amrein, Pomona College Jay Donald Andrews, Virginia Institute Ernest E, Angino, Texas A&M Albert Arking, NYU Alfred R. Armstrong, Virginia Institute Samuel A. Arny, USDA Graduate School Robert S, Arthur, Scripps Institution John C, Ayers, U of Michigan J. R. Bailey, Duke : W. Robert A, Bailey, U of Delaware Gerald J. Bakus, U of Southern California Orville L, Bandy, U of Southern California Albert H. Banner, U of Hawaii Karl Banse, U of Washington Eric G. Barham, SanDiego State College Richard A. Barkley, U of Hawaii John P, Barlow, Cornell Clifford A, Barnes, U of Washington H, L. Barnes, Pennsylvania State T. F. Bates, Pennsylvania State Paul S, Bauer, American U E. W. Behrens, U of Texas Andrew A, Benson, Scripps Institution Joseph W, Berg, Jr., Oregon State Robert A. Berner, U of Chicago R, J. Beyers, U of Texas Charles A. Biese, Stanford Francis Birch, Harvard Robert E, Lee Black, Virginia Institute Robert T. Black, U of Wisconsin Donald F, Blake, Walla Walla College Harvey Blatt, U of Houston Lawrence R. Blinks, Stanford Edward G. Boettinger, U of Connecticut 157 C. G. Bookhout, Duke Rolf L. Bolin, Stanford Milton N. Bramlette, Scripps Institution Morris Leroy Brehmer, Virginia Institute Vernon E, Briard, U of Houston J. C. Briggs, U of Texas G. W. Brindley, Pennsylvania State Wallace Broecker, Columbia Andrew F. Bunker, NYU M. D. Burkhardt, USDA Graduate School Wayne V, Burt, Oregon State Mitchell A, Byrd, Virginia Institute John V. Byrne, Oregon State Andrew G. Carey, Oregon State James H. Carpenter, Johns Hopkins George F. Carrier, Harvard Dayton E, Carritt, MIT Theodore Chamberlain, U of Hawaii Leslie A. Chambers U of Southern California D. C. Chandler, U of Michigan Valentine J. Chapman, Oregon Inst. of Marine Biology Jule G, Charney, MIT A, F, Chestnut, U of North Carolina George W. Chu, U of Hawaii Arnold M, Clark, U of Delaware George L. Clarke, Harvard William H, Clayton, Texas A&M Thomas Clements, U of Southern California Robert C. Cleverdon, U of Connecticut Lewis M, Cline, U of Wisconsin John D. Cochrane, Texas A&M Harold G. Coffin, Walla Walla College Eugene E, Collins, U of Washington John T, Conover, U of Rhode Island B. J. Copeland, U of Texas Eugene F, Corcoran, U of Miami Milton J. Cormier, U of Georgia “D. P. Costello, U of North Carolina J. D. Costlow, Duke Grant Cottam, U of Wisconsin Charles S, Cox, Scripps Institution 364 Doak C. Cox, U of Hawaii Ronald W. Crawford, San Diego State College Joe S. Creager, U of Washington Herbert Curl, Jr., Oregon State Joseph R. Curray, Scripps Institution D. H. Cushing, U of Wisconsin Franklin C. Daiber, U of Delaware William Dwight Dather, Naval Post- graduate School Benjamin Davidson, NYU Gregory A. Davis, U of Southern California E. Yale Dawson, U of Southern California David Dean, U of Connecticut Meir H. Degani, SUNY Maritime College Peter Dehlinger, Oregon State William H, Dennen, MIT John W. DeWitt, Humboldt State College Manuel Diaz-Piferrer, U of Puerto Rico James Dorman; U of Wisconsin Robert H. Dott, U of Wisconsin M. S. Doty, U of Hawaii Charles L, Drake, Columbia R. T. Duquet, Pennsylvania State Leon S. Dure, U of Georgia Alyn C. Duxbury, Yale Robert G. Eagon, U of Georgia Alfred W. Ebeling, Yale Carl H. Eckart, Scripps Institution Ian E, Efford, Oregon Inst. of Marine Biology Alfred W, Eipper, Cornell Robert Elder, USDA Graduate School Robert L. Ellison, Virginia Institute Sayed Z. El-Sayed, Texas A&M Beatrice T. Emery, Walla Walla College Cesare Emiliani, U of Miami John T. Emlen, U of Wisconsin Thomas S. English, U of Washington Richard I, Evans, U of Wisconsin Gifford C. Ewing, Scripps Institution W. Maurice Ewing, Columbia Edward W, Fager, Scripps Institution W. E. Fahy, U of North Carolina 158 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Paul H. Fan, U of Houston David A. Farris, San Diego State College Howard M. Feder, Oregon Inst. of Marine Biology Charles J. Fish, U of Rhode Island Richard H. Fleming, U of Washington G. E. Fogg, U of Wisconsin Gerald A. Fowler, Oregon State Denis L. Fox, Scripps Institution Guy A. Franceschini, Texas A&M Peter W. Frank, Oregon Inst. ,oftMarine Biology Dirk Frankenberg, U of Georgia Lemuel A. Fraser, U of Wisconsin Jeffery D, Frautschy, Scripps Institution Hubert W. Frings, U of Hawaii Harry K. Fritchman, Oregon Inst. of Marine Biology Herbert F, Frolander, Oregon State Dave Fultz, U of Chicago John Garth, U of Southern California James A, Gast, Humboldt State College Peter W. Glynn, U of Puerto Rico Edward D, Goldberg, Scripps Institution Juan Gerardo Gonzalez, U of Puerto Rico Richard M, Goody, Harvard Bernard L. Gordon, Northeastern Donn S. Gorsline, U of Southern California William A. Gosline, U of Hawaii W. P,. Graebel, U of Michigan I. E. Gray, Duke Jack Green, U of Southern California Leonard Greenfield, U of Miami Robert Greenwood, U of Houston J. C. Griffiths, Pennsylvania State Meredith A, Gross, U of Washington Harlyn 0. Halvorson, U of Wisconsin Edwin L, Hamilton, Scripps Institution Lloyd Hampton, U of Texas William J. Hargis, Virginia Institute Philip Wyman Harrison, Virginia Institute Olga Hartman, U of Southern California Arthur D, Hasler, U of Wisconsin Klaus L. Hasselmann, Scripps Institution NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Dexter Stearns Haven, Virginia Institute Francis T, Haxo, Scripps Institution Joel W. Hedgpeth, U of the Pacific, U of Chicago Bruce Heezen, Columbia Philip Helfrich, U of Hawaii Vernon J. Henry, U of Georgia L. F. Herzog, Pennsylvania State E, W. Hewson, U of Michigan Joseph J. Hickey, U of Wisconsin Homer W. Hiser, U of Miami M. H. Hommersand, U of North Carolina Donald W. Hood, Texas A&M Warren J, Houck, Humboldt State College J. L. Hough, U of Michigan Henry G. Houghton, MIT B. F. Howell, Jr., Pennsylvania State John J. Hoyt, U of Georgia Sidney C. Hsiao, U of Hawaii Carl L. Hubbs, Scripps Institution George L. Huebner, Texas A&M Gilbert C. Hughes, III, U of the Pacific H. J. Humn, Duke Frederick V, Hunt, Harvard Russell P. Hunter, Duke Wanda S, Hunter, Duke Edward R. Ibert, Texas A&M Takashi Ichiye, Florida State Clarence P. Idyll, U of Miami Roy L. Ingram, U of North Carolina Douglas L. Inman, Scripps Institution John D. Isaacs, Scripps Institution Columbus O"D, Iselin, Harvard, MIT Edwin S. Iversen, U of Miami Dr. Richard H. Jahns, Pennsylvania State Harry P. Jeffries, U of Rhode Island C. E. Jenner, U of North Carolina Martin W. Johnson, Scripps Institution Ralph G. Johnson, U of the Pacific, U of Chicago T. W. Johnson, Duke Albert C. Jones, U of Miami Galen E. Jones, Scripps Institution Edwin Bibb Joseph, Virginia Institute Glenn Harold Jung, Naval Postgraduate School James C. Kakvas, U of Delaware Fred I. Kamemto, U of Hawaii John W. Kanwisher, MIT Samuel Katz, Rensselaer Poly Delbar P, Keily, MIT 159 365 M. L. Keith, Pennsylvania State Gene Ross Kellough, U of Houston George C. Kent, Cornell Bostwick H, Ketchum, Harvard C, Albert Kind, U of Connecticut John M, Kingsbury, Cornell Blair Kinsman, Johns Hopkins John A, Knauss, U of Rhode Island Stanley G. Knight, U of Wisconsin Fritz F, Koczy, U of Miami Eva Konrad, U of Delaware Louis S. Kornicker, Texas A&M Eugene N. Kozloff, U of the Pacific Dale C, Krause, U of Rhode Island James B, Krause, U of Delaware P, D. Krynine, Pennsylvania State J. Laurence Kulp, Columbia Taivo Laevastu, U of Hawaii Charles E, Lane, U of Miami William M, Lanphere, Humboldt State College Earl Lathrop, Walla Walla College Dr. George H. Lauff, U of Georgia G. Fred Lee, U of Wisconsin Dale F, Leipper, Texas A§M Arno T, Lenz, U of Wisconsin Ralph A, Lewin, Scripps Institution D. A. Livingstone, Duke Frank G, Lowman, U of Puerto Rico J. L. Lumley, Pennsylvania State William A, Lund, U of North Carolina John C. Marr, U of Hawaii Nelson Marshall, U of Rhode Island Donald C, Matthews, U of Hawaii W. Bruce McAlister, Oregon State William McBlair, San Diego State College James E, McCauley, Oregon State Elizabeth McCoy, U of Wisconsin John A. McGowan, Scripps Institution Hugh J. McLellan, Texas A&M Robert L, McMasters, U of Rhode Island Giles W. Mead, Harvard Ely Mencher, MIT R, W. Menzel, Florida State Daniel Merriman, Yale Charles B, Metz, Florida State Robert P, Meyer, U of Wisconsin Samuel P, Meyers, U of Miami F, C, Michelson, U of Michigan James E, Miller NYU Robert L. Miller, U of Chicago Ralph M, Moberly, U of Hawaii 366 John L. Mohr, U of Southern California Peter L. Monkmeyer, U of Wisconsin Raymond B. Montgomery, Johns Hopkins Hilary B. Moore, U of Miami J. Robert Moore, U of Houston Richard Y. Morita, Oregon State C. H. Mortimer, U of Wisconsin George Moskovits, Virginia Institute Barry S. Muir, U of Hawaii Walter H. Munk, Scripps Institution Stanley R. Murphy, U of Washington John E, Nafe, Columbia Ferris Neave, U of Wisconsin John C. Neess, U of Wisconsin Bruce W. Nelson, Virginia Institute Gerhard Neumann, NYU William A. Newman, Scripps Institution Maynard:-M, Nicholos, Virginia Institute Lowell E, Noland, U of Wisconsin John Judson Norcross, Virginia Institute Matthew F, Norton, American U Worth D. Nowlin, Texas A&M Richard A. Nystrom, U of Delaware Eugene P, Odum, U of Georgia H. T. Odum, U of Texas Jack E. Oliver, Columbia Katsuyuki Ooyama, NYU Carl H. Oppenheimer, U of Miami Erling J. Ordal, U of Washington Charles Osterberg, Oregon State J. Rosson Overcash, Northeastern Ray D. Owen, Cal. Tech. Harding Owre, U of Miami H. A. Panofsky, Pennsylvania State Kilho Park, Oregon State Bernard Clarence Patten, Virginia Institute June G, Pattullo, Oregon State William J. Payne, U of Georgia William G, Pearcy, Oregon State Willis E, Pequegnat, Texas A&M Melvin N..A. Peterson, Scripps Institution Sverre Petterssen, U of Chicago Norman A, Phillips, MIT 160 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 John H. Phillips, Stanford Fred B, Phleger, Scripss Institution Grace E. Pickford, Yale Willard J, Peirson, Jr.., NYU Orrin Pilkey, U of Georgia George W. Platzman, U of Chicago Lawrence R, Pomeroy, U of Georgia H. J. Porter, U of North Carolina C, F. Powers, U of Michigan David M, Pratt, U of Rhode Island Donald W, Pritchard, Johns Hopkins K. M. Rae, U of Ala8ka Robert A, Ragotzkie, U of Wisconsin E. H, Rainwater, U of Houston Norris W, Rakestraw, Scripps Institution John E, Randall, U of Puerto Rico Edward C, Raney, Cornell John S. Rankin, Jr., U of Connecticut Maurice Rattray, U of Washington Susan S, Raup, Johns Hopkins Sammy M. Ray, Texas A&M Robert 0, Reid, Texas A&M William G, Reeder, U of Wisconsin Ernst S. Reese, U of Hawaii Anthony Reso, U of Houston Roger Revelle, Scripps Institution Francis A, Richards, U of Washington Richard L, Ridenhour, Humboldt State College William R, Riedel, Scripps Institution Donald W. Rigby, Walla Walla College Wilbur A. Rinehart, Oregon State Gordon A, Riley, Yale Juan A, Rivero, U of Puerto Rico C. Richard Robins, U of Miami Alan R, Robinson, Harvard Gerald A, Rohlich, U of Wisconsin Raphael R. Ronkin, U of Delaware Philip Rudnick, Scripps Institution George R. Rumney, U of Connecticut Gene A. Rusnat, U of Miami William Sackett, Columbia Saul B, Saila, U of Rhode Island Ernest 0, Salo, Humboldt State College Muriel I. Sandeen, Duke William B. Sarles, U of Wisconsin Johnathan D, Sauer, U of Wisconsin —« aos > wat = NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 367 Paul R. Saunders, U of Southern California Jay M. Savage, U of Southern California Horace J. Sawin, U of Delaware Milner B. Schaefer, Scripps Institution David R. Schink, U of Rhode Island Per F. Scholander, Scripps Institution Richard M, Schotland, NYU R. F. Schmalz, Pennsylvania State John J. Schule, USDA Graduate School Morris Schulkin, USDA Graduate School Donald C. Scott, U of Georgia William W, Scott, Virginia Institute Gunter Seckel, U of Hawaii Richard W, Shafer, Oregon State Fgancis P. Shepard, Scripps Institution Robert R. Shrock, MIT Carl N. Shuster, U of Delaware John McN, Sieburth, U of Rhode Island Raymond Siever, Harvard Silvio Simplicio, NYU Donald M. Skauen, U of Connecticut Lawrence F, Small, Oregon State Theodore J. Smayda, U of Rhode Island F, G. Walton Smith, Oregon State G. Fred Somers, U of Delaware John D. Soule, U of Southern California Jerome Spar, NYU Fred N. Spiess, Scripps Institution Shirley Sparling, Oregon Inst. of Marine Biology Victor P. Starr, MIT Henry Stevens, USDA Graduate School A. E, Stiven, U of North Carolina Joseph St. Jean, U of North Carolina Henry M. Stommel, Harvard John F, Stout, Walla Walla College Elizabeth Strong, Oregon State E. Dixon Stroup, Johns Hopkins George Sutton, Columbia Gustav A. Swanson, Cornell Michio Takata, U of Hawaii Walter Rowland Taylor, Johns Hopkins Fred Telonicher, Humboldt State College Albert L. Tester, U of Hawaii Adam Thomas, U of Houston 161 Warren Charles Thompson, Naval Post- graduate School Charles Thor, SUNY Maritime College Richard Tibby, U of Southern California James H, Torrie, U of Wisconsin Joshua I, Tracey, USDA Graduate School Francis R, Trainor, U of Connecticut Marenes R. Tripp, U of Delaware Gordon H. Tucker, San Diego State College John S. Tucker, U of the Pacific Sidney J. Twonsley, U of Hawaii Tjeerd H. Van Andel, Scripps Institution C. Van Baalen, U of Texas Willard Abraham Van Engel, Virginia Institute Richard H, Van Haagen, U of Washington Cornelis B. Van Niel, Stanford DeWitt C. Van Siclen, U of Houston Pieter Van Weel, U of Hawaii F, J. Vernberg, Duke George Veronis, MIT James R, Villemonte, U of Wisconsin William C. Vinyard, Humboldt State College Benjamin E, Volcani, Scripps Institution William S, Von Arx, MIT Gilbert L. Voss, U of Miami Peter J. Wangersky, Yale Germaine L. Warmke, U of Puerto Rico Marvin Leroy Wass, Virginia Institute Kenneth L, Webb, U of Georgia J. N. Weber, Pennsylvania State Dwight A, Webster, Cornell Evelyn Clare Wells, Virginia Institute Ralph M. Wetzel, U of Connecticut Peter K. Weyl, Oregon State Jacob Bertram Wickham, Naval Postgraduate School A. B. Williams, U of North Carolina Robert H, Williams, U of Miami E, Bright Wilson, Jr., Harvard J. T. Wilson, U of Michigan Perry W. Wilson, U of Wisconsin John W. Winchester, MIT Warren Wisby, U of Miami John Langille Wood, Virginia Institute 368 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Langley Harriss Wood, Virginia Institute Philip S.:Woods, U of Delaware William Joseph Woods, U of North Carolina George P. Woollard, U of Hawaii Warren S. Wooster, Scripps Institution J. Lamar Worzel, Columbia Georg Wust, Columbia 162 Bruce Wyatt, Oregon State Ellis Yochelson, American U John Zeigler, U of Chicago Harry Zeitlin, U of Hawaii Fred C, Ziesenhenne, U of Southern California Russel L,. Zimmer, U of Southern California Claude E. Zobell, Seripps Institution APPENDIX 4 AQUATIC SCIENCES IN THE GREAT LAKES AREA, SUB- MITTED BY HON. JAMES H. WAKELIN, JR., ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE NAVY AND PREPARED BY ROBERT B. ABEL, EXECUTIVE SECRETARY, INTERAGENCY COMMIT- TEE ON OCEANOGRAPHY, INCLUDING OTHER DOCUMENTS ON SAME TOPIC 369 35-377 O—64——25 wang ‘ened, Hea . Bich ute lie west! og = Tia mpd Wale uy , Gepeps, 7. penta, vane z me ae hha) ie Like “eouygeia Tra eaaeien Ky batenit Sh Spoil kat! ceoee Wont; ‘Cote sh (hak cries mre inna lbisncadae veined ea nate eget met lage piace mh AN mm gaincwge 8 eae nk wg lry = Son Fa atone renner AT LS WF oe ipl unt feud ee ner THAGOR YR. GASAGINS C04 | TMMOS LOLA LAAT AL vanes on he RTVIE MIO? BERTO SLMS 4 Oren SOLD ‘ear meee eee paar (Por SmeprAd Late a aad pe eng eet darter ten eter NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 371 AQUATIC SCIENCES LIN) Gust do GREAT BAK ES AR HA Prepared by: Robert B. Abel, Executive Secretary, Interagency Committee on Oceanography June 1963 aL INTRODUCTION The Great lakes comprise the largest body of fresh water in the world. They are vitally important to health, recreation, economic growth, . and cultural enhancement to the peoples of the surroundiny: territories in the United States and Canada. the increasing national and repional interest in the Great lakes as one of our great natural resources has brought to the attention of federal, state, and local authorities the urgent need tor a significant upgrading in research programs pertinent to the area. It is the purpose of this report to tabulate studies in aquatic sciences being prosecuted under federal sponsorship or participation in this area. it should be noted, however, that extensive work is also being accomplished in projects supported independently by state governments and industry. Subjects covered include all forms of aquatic science such as oceanography (in a laboratory sense); limnology; fresh water, marine, aud fisheries biology; and hydrosphere-atmosphere proprams. 372 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 II UNITED STATES - CANADA COOPERATION In recognition of the need for scientific research and productive development, the governments of the United States and Canada have joined in forming the International Joint Commission, whose objective is the safe- guarding of the quality of the waters bounding Michigan, the Province of Ontario, and New York. Co-chairmen of this commission are Mr, Tino Roncalio for the United States and Mr. A. G. L. McNaughton for Canada, The work of this commission is but one evidence of the extremely advanced state of cooperation between federal, state, and county governments, colleges, and industrial concerns in prosecuting privately and federally sponsored programs. In 1909 the United States and Canada signed the Boundary Waters Treaty.. The International Joint Commission was created by that treaty. The treaty recognized the importance of the Great Lakes to both countries for: (1) domestic and sanitary purposes; (2) navigation including the services of canals; (3) power and irrigation. Since the treaty was signed, needs for industry, recreation, and conservation of fish and wildlife have also come into prominence. Approximately 4,600,000 people residing in about 90 neighboring communities obtain water from the Great Lakes and tributary rivers. Domestic water requirements are presently in excess of 888 million gallons per day. The size of the filtration and chemical treatment problems incident to this usage is obvious. A considerable amount of research and planning have gone into the establishment of the 39 major domestic water intakes. In many instances chemical treatment involves special measures for removal of highly toxic compounds resulting from industrial waste. ; Depredation by the lamprey and,other obnoxious living sources of infestation and destruction has almost totally halted all commercial fishing in the Great Lakes areas. However, there is considerable sport fishing7in ~ Lake Superior, Lake Huron, and Lake Erie. The Joint Commission is working closely with federal and state fish and game departments to protect these fisheries and to plan for eventual, expansion and recovery of commereijal fishing. Numbers of areas contiguous to the waters are known as excellent hunting grounds, both public and private. These are primarily habitats for waterfowl. Here again the commission is active in supervising methods for control and conservation. A number of public and private bathing beaches exist for recreational use in the Great Lakes area. The largest accommodates 0,000 people, Other forms of water recreation include pleasure boating and skin diving. Although the exact number is not known it is possible that there are NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 373 nearly 100,000 pleasure craft of all sizes operating in these waters. The commission has been active in combatting pollution, the worst obstacle to development of a large number of otherwise splendid potential resort areas, Jt has been reported that. during the last, navipaltion season, which spans about eight ice free months, commerce passing ‘through the Great Lakes area exceeded the combined tonnage transiting both the Panama and Suez Canals, in an entire year. It is interesting to note that about 85% of all of the iron ore produced in the United States is transported vi@ the Great Lakes. During the last decade Montreal was believed to be the second largest port in the entire North American Continent in terms of total tonnage handled. This alone gives some indication of the enormous use being made of the Great Lakes for navigational purposes and of the interest of the Joint Commission representing the two governments in giving all possible encouragement and support to development; of navigational aids, harbor and channel dredging programs, and ice forecasting projects. The Commission works very closely with a large number of industrial interests including automotive, steam power, oil refining, pulp and paper, and chemical] and steel industries of all. kinds. Considerable aquatic research is underway purGcuant Lo, this darye seale indugliial use, since most of the water is returned directly to the Lakes as waste. By far the most important function of the Commission is the over- view of sanitation programs, Objectives in pollution contrel include the creation of maintenance of clean and healthy surroundings (including develop- ment of resort areas) the 2xpansio: of industry, and the furnishing of resources for agriculture, navigation, and power. In pursuance of these aims the Commission is concentrating its effort on: (1) construction of treatment facilities; (2) measurement of chemical constituents of waste’ discharges; and (3) analysis of reeeived water to measure pollution indicios. _As evidence of the interest of the United States, particularly in pollution studies, the Public Ilealth Service supports more scientific programs in the Great Lakes area than any other federal agency. The Commission works very closely with the U.S. Public Health Service, Michigan Water Resources Commission, the Michigan State Department -of Health, the Water Pollution Control Board of New York, the New York State Department of Health, the Department af National Health and Welfare of Canada and the Ontario Department of Health (Canada). The method of operation used by the Commission is usually to appoint advisory boards of technical experts who plan, direct, and control field investigations and report their findings. _ The Commission then recommends appropriate measures to the two governments. 374 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 {II AGTIVIL ONS OF LM UNTIVIRG LEY Ol’ MICUIGAN, GREAT LAKIsS 1 RCH DIVISION The Great Lakes Research Institute was established at the University of Michigan by act of the Board of Regents on May 16, 1965. The charter of the Institute included the "encouragement and integration of studies of the physical, chemical, biological, and other aspects of the Great Lakes and Yelated areas." The Institute was reorganized as a @ivision of the Institute of Science and Technology of the University of Michigan on April 1, 1960. The division now states its objectives as follows: (1) "to contribute by every means at its disposal to increase understanding of all aspects of the Great Lakes Region. (2) To cooperate with other organizations on the campus (of the University of Michigan) within the state, and outside the state in the conduct of mutually beneficial research on the Great Lakes and their tributary waters. (3) To make available the results of Great Lakes investigations and to make special efforts to place them in the hands of those concerned with practical operations. (4) To serve in general as a center for Great Lakes information and research for the university, the state, and the Great Lakes region. (5) To implement the teaching and research program of the University of Michigan." The primary function of the division i: the prosecution of pia projects relating to the Great ares area, The Division sui,orts an ext: large and competent staff of oceanographers, marine biologists, ntibetfol ueROLs., hydrologists, and a number of practitioners of disciplines subordinate to these. The Division sponsors an annual conference on Great Lakes research, normally held at the university at ann Arbor. Scientists from all of the active Great Lakes research organizations are invited to present papers at these conferences. At the same time each includes information on the gh Soe aS organization, functions, and accomplishments of the research unit to which he belongs. This enables up-to-date compilations of the nature and activities of all of the organizations carrying out scientific programs of importance to the Great Lakes area. The last portion of each of these conferences is normally devoted to comprehensive panel discussions wherein the participants summarize their impressions of the current status of Great Lakes research. The final period of the conference is usually occupies in ;eneral disenssion of ways and means of improving, the research program. A second activity of the Division is that of acbing as a special. clearing house for compilation and distribubiion of research data related to the area. The Division cooperates with the Great Lakes Commission Jn issuing periodic research check lists of this area. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 375 The Sixth Conference on Great Lakes Research has just been completed (June 13-15, 1963). It was conducted in conjunction with the 26th annual meeting of the American Society of Limnol@égy and Oceanography. The program theme was the Aquatic Environment. The entire period was divided into sessions covering: (1) Physical characterist&gs, (2) Chemical characteristics, (3) Geological and meteorological characteristics, (4) . Biological integrators, and (5) Biology and water resources. 376 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 IV TABULATION OF AQUATIC SCIENCE PROJECTS IN THE GREAT LAKES AREA SUPPORTED BY OR PARTICIPATED IN BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT Projects will be tabulated under sponsoring agency and project title and described by: a. Principal investigator b. Purpose of project c. Nature of project d. Fuftding, if known Items marked with an asterisk are projects of general interest, not exclusively concerned with the Great Lakes. A. Public Health Service The 1961 Appropriations Act included $500 thousand for the Public Health Service to commence development of a comprehensive water pollution control program for the Great Lakes. During the first three years particular effort was devoted to the Illinois Waterway at the Southern end of Lake Michigan. The most important project within the overall program concerns a series of 11 current measuring stations forming the first part of a 52 station network, These form a preat pattern covering the entire area of Lake Michigan. Sensitive automatic recording devices measure winds, currents, tomperatuz'e, and related environmental conditions; the information is stored for several months on photographic film. The Public Health Service has opened a ‘field basin. According to the plan, investigations are to proceed to Lake Huron, Lake Ontario, and Lake Superior in that order. They are scheduled over a seven year period and are considered to be approximately 40% complete to S533 The pot ovane projects are contractually supported by the Public Health Service. 1. Isolation and taxonomy of yeast in lakes and sewage. a. Dr. Leslie R. Hedrick, Chairman of the Biology Department, Illinois Institute of Technology. b. To increase knowledge ot the ecological distribution of yeast in tresh water lakes and streams. c. Yeast8are isolated from their habitat by means of enrich- ment proceedures or membrane filters. The yeast: are studied for their identification and classification. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 377 2. Ecology-quality changes in Lakes Michigan and Erie. a. Dr. C. F, Powers, Department of Zoology, University of Michigan. b. To study the chemical constituency and biological population in the waters in these lakes as an aid to pollution procedures. c. Quantities of water are sampled throughout these lakes and are subjected to chemical analysis and biological identification. ad. $51,326 3. Diatoms of the west end of Lake lirie. a. Dr. C. Kh. Taft, Department of Botany, Ohio State University. b. To identify plankton in Lake Erie. c. Samples of water are subjected to biological identification. ce. $9,085 . Vitamin B-12 in the Great Lakes and its ecological. significance. a. Dr. A. D. Hasler, University of Wisconsin. b. To determine certain chemical functions of the environment and its effects on the population. , ce. The waters in the Great Lakes are analyzed for their vitamin B-12 content; a number of organisms are subjected to varied proportions of this ingredient to determine their life processes as a measure of its concentration. 5. A study of fundamental productivity ina stream, a, Dr. Robert C. ae Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University. ' b. To evaluate productivity of a stream and describe results of solar energy input. cc. Biological productivity studies have been carried out and evaluated in terms of physical and chemical properties of the water. 6. Serum stress patterns as related to stream ecology. a. Dr. Robert C. Ball, Professor of Limnology, Department of Fisheries, Michigan State University. 378 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 b. ‘lo explore the possibility that stresses on local organisms are indicative of changes in the marine environment in the Great Lakes, ce. Electrophoresis and chromatographic techniques are utilized in analyzing serum protein of vertebrates and invertebrates, d. $14,116 (present fiscal year) 7. Uptake of organic compounds by marine invertebrates. a. Dr. G. C. Stevens, Asspociate Professor of Zoology, University of Minnesota. b. To study the capacity to absorb selected organic US LESLLSS among aquatic animals. c. fadioactive tracers are used to study changes in distribution of radioactivity between solutions and the experimental animal to determine the nature of the selective uptake of the material. 8.. Microbiology of dilute enrichment. a. Dr. R. S. Wolfe, Professor of Microbiology, University of lllinois. b. To study Great Lakes organisms of potential nuisance walue. c. The ecology, nutrition, and physiology of these orgamisms is studied in the laboratory under conditions of continuous supplies of dilute nutrients. 9. Growth and physiology of Alage. a. Dr. Olf-Hasen, University of Wisconsin. b.. To study the growth of various types of Great Lakes alage (green and blue-green) and fungi with respect to the uptake of nutrients. c. Growth patterns of these algae are examined under varied | concentrations of vitamin B-12 and: carbon 1-labeled bicarbonate and organic | substrates. 10.. Biological factors in the management of lake flies. _a. Dr. William L. Hilsenoff and others, University of Wisconsin. b., Determination of conditions necessary for optimum frrowth of various Creal Lakes orpanisms, ee OE EEE ee NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 379 c. Laboratory tests are run on a number of these organisms. Samples are collected from a number of lakes to determine changes in bottom fauna, Chemical and physical measurements are made at the same time, 11. ‘he identification and Determination of organic substances, particularly pesticidesand oils, in fish and surface waters. a, Charles S. Myers, Division of Sanitary Engineering, Pennsylvania Department of Health. b. Determine deleterious effects of pesticides and oils upon fish. c. A number of organic compounds have been isolated from Pennsylvania streams feeding the Great Lakes. These are being studied, with special attention being given to pesticides and odor producing substances. Oils and gasolines found on the surface and underground waters are also being identified. The effects of the toxic effects of many of these compounds are being studied on fish. 13. &ffect of paper-fibre waste on fish eggs and juvenile fishes. a. Dr. Lloyd L. Smith, Department of Entomology, Fisheries and Wildlife, University of Minnesota and others. b. To study fish egg mortality rates in contaminated stream areas. ec. Influence of varying wood-fibre loads on minnows and walleye pike at different levels of temperature and oxygen content is being studied through measurement of blood characteristics and mortality rates. Influence of gas toxins evolved from sludge mats is being determined on fish and invertebrates. 1h. Investigation of biological control of snails. a. Dr. Clifford O. Berg, Professor of Limnology, New York State College of Agriculture at Cornell University. b. To gain understanding of the natural history and morphology of snail flies in the Great Lakes area. c. Laboratory and field testing is being carried out to find species for introduction to problem areas. Biotic potentials are being evaluated of these species and their chances of survival and multiplication in Great Lakes environmental conditions. 380 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 15. The nature of cellular response in various Great Lakes organisms. a. Dr. Dominic L. Degiusti, Professor of Parasitology and Biology, Wayne State niversity. b. To study the ecology of parasitism in a small stable stream environment. 2 ec. ‘the morphology and Jife cycle of a number of Great Lakes organisms are being studied on various lish coasts. 16. The sexual hormones of achlya bisexualism. a. Alma W. Barksdale, Seniigr Research Associate, New York Botanical Garden, b, To study sexual reproduction in certain species of water mold in the Great Lakes area, ce. Reproduction is initiated and regulated by a series of substances secreted by the sexually reactive thalli. The nutritional and environmental conditions necessary for maximum production of hormones are determined; this hornon: is extracted, surified and studia® with resnect to sexual reproduction. #17. Chronic effects of stabie organic substances on sunfish. a. Dr. John Cairns, Associate Curator of Limnolory. New Yor. Academy of Natural Sciences, b. To study chronic effects of subweakened oncentxations of stable complex organic compounds upon the brue gill sunfish. c. Oxygen uptake, “ruising speed, fatigue, and tissue changes in the gills are examined relative to the effect of various compounds upon the glue gill sunfish.’ #18, Factors influencing free living nematodes in water supplies. a. Mr. R. S. Engelbrecht, Professor of Sanitary Engineering, University of Tllinois. b. To study the fundamental factors surrounding the presence of free living nematodes in water supplies. ec. The ecology of these worms is studied both in raw water and under laboratory conditions. Environmental control measures are evaliated as are present day water treatment methods for removal of these creatures from water supplies. Food and feeding habits of the worms are also investigaved. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 381 #19, Biological extraction and accumulation in streams, a. Dr. C. J. Veiz, Chairman, Department of Environmental Health, University of Michigan and others. b. To determine the basic environment condition giving rise to formations of growths in streams. ec. To determine biological actions governing the rates of extraction of oxygen and to investigate the means of controlling or eliminating such formations. d. Various streams which react differently with respect to gross formation of biological growths, concentration of oxygen will be studied over periods of time and geographically, Basic investigations will be conducted in laboratories and in the natural streams. B, The National Science Foundation. The National Science Foundation sponsors a number of projects in the Great Lakes area. Sponsorship is primarily centered in the Division of Biological and Medical Sciences and the Division of Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 1. Relation of population density to growth and competition. a. Dr. Frederick E, Smith, Associate Professor of Zoology, University of Michigan. b. To describe the growth relations of certain populations in the Great Lakes. c. Numerous species in the family daphnidae are being. studied to relate the population growth to the population density and food density, Life table techniques are being used with mass cultures. All possible two- species systems are being followed to determine competitive relationships. *2, Functional analysis of certain plant communities. a, Mr. Pier Dansereau, Assistant Director, New York Botanical Garden. be To test and improve methods for analysis of various types of plants and to apply a large body of data for functional pe of phytosociological units in the Gaspe” Peninsula. c. The principal communities are being sampled Bek cane ecosystems under study include the mesophytic forest, riparian forest, open shrubby grass land, salt marshes, rocky cliffs, and barren fields. 382 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 *3, A study of hatching and of the ecology of egg masses of aquatic invertebrates. a. Charles C. Davis, Department of Biolozy, Western leserve University. b. To study the hatching prowess of aquatic invertebrates. ¢. Quantitative studies of Sauna and flora are being carried out in connection with egg cases and egg masses including investigations of invasions of egg masses by various organisms. Numerous collections of animals are being observed during hatchings as well as their responses to environmental conditions. #4. North American ichthyology. a. Dr. Iidward C. Raney, Conservation Department, Cornell University. b, ‘le-collect and study blood serum and hemogolobin: to investigate the systematics of several species of darter; to study the systematics of redhorse smckers; to study a number of other Great Lakes organisms. ec. A series of comrehensive biological! investigations of a number of organisms of the Great Laxes area is being carried out relative tv the chemical and biological characteristics of the Great Lakes environment, primarily off Lake Ontario. *5. Ecological and taxonomic studies on aquatic coleoptera. a, Dr. Frank N. Yound, Associate l’rofessor of “oology. University. ef Indiana. b. To classify North American water beetles and to prepare a manual of the species. Five genera of water beetles are being studied biologically and chemically. 6. Interspecific relationships in natural and laboratory populations of paramecium. a. Dr. Nelson G. Hairston, Associate Professor of Zoology, University of Michigan. b. To examine competitive relationships. among four varieties ' of paramecium in the vicinity of the lakes surrounding Ann Arbor, ec. Field examinations in laboratory tests are carried out among varieties of paramec ikun. a reference work. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 383 7. Dynamics of fresh water stream invertebrate populations. a. T. F. Waters, Associate Professor, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, University of Minnesota. b. To study major population dynamics of fresh water stream invertebrate populations, ec. Down stream drift of invertebrates is studied, involving relationships among production rate, rate of change in population density, and removal rate. Production rate is estimated and related to drift. 8. Dynamics and ecology of Castor. canadensis. a. D. L. Allen, Professor of Wildlife Management, Purdue University. b. To determine the number and relationships of the beaver in a biotic community dominated by the timber wolf and in which the principal prey species is the moose. ¢c. This study of an insular beaver population in upper Lake Superior involves an analysis of the trends of beaver numbers and their food supply. #9, Viral diseases of fresh-water fish. a. R. G. Malsberger, Lehigh University. b. To isolate and characterize the virus causing a number of diseases. ec. Tissue culture methods are used in addition to examination of various fresh-water fishes for lichens from which viruses might be isolated, *10, Systematic and ecological survey of North American Desmidiaceae. a. G. W. Prescott, Professor of Botany, Michigan State University. b. To synopsize North American Desmidiaceae and to provide ec. All available records and drawings of this group of western hemisphere algae are being compiled together with substantiated records of other workers on North American Desmids. The resulting publication | gives a brief description of each species and variety together with distribution data, habitat notes, and a summary of what is known about the ecology (with illustrations). 384 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 #11, Morphogenesis in aquatic fungi. a, J. S. Livett, Assistant Professor, Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University. b. To investigate the basis of growth, differentiation, and reproduction in simple and aquatic fungi. c, Nutrition and sexual reproduction of certain species are studied; the conditions necessary for reproducible synchronous germination and growth are analyzed; the biochemistry and phytology of the earliest aeece during zoospore germination aro analyzed. 12, An investiyation of ecological succession in sand spit ponds. © a. E. J. Kormandy, Assistant Professor Zoology, Oberlin College. b. To study the ecological attributes of succession in ponds of comparable origin tin Lake Erie. c. Physical, chemical and biological characteristics are measured on Presque Isle on Lake Erie. Measurements include temperature, water level fluctuation, turbidity, morphometry and exposure. Dissolved oxygen, carbon dioxide, pH, alkalinity, phosphate, nitrogen, and iron are also measured, 13. Larval and adult Hydracarine and their insect pests. a, R. M, Crowell, Associate Professor of Biology, St. Lawrence University. b. To correlate water mites with their adult forms and insect hosts. c. Field collections of free living stages of mites are made with subsequence observations of developmental stages in the laboratory. *1). Continued studies of the water fungi, Blastocladiella and Emersoniia. a. E, C. Konteno, Professor of Botany, Michigan State University. ; b. To relate differentiation of resistant cells and rise and fall enzyme activities. ¢. The aquatic phycomycete, blastocladiella emersoniia, are studied with respect to differentiation and enzyme activities induced by the bicarbonate concentration in the environment. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 385 15. lLimnological interaction in Lake Mendota. a. A. D. Hasler,.Professor of Zoology, and others, University of Wisconsin. b. To study comprehensively all of the interactions in the environment in Lake Mendota. c. The environmental factors upon the life history of the white bass are investigated including the causes of variations in the reproductive success and the mechanism by which the fish recognize an ecological barrier. The possible relationship between oscillation of internal waves in the lakes and activity of the fauna in these regions is also under investigation. 16. Hnergy budget of Copepoda of Jake Winnedagro Wisconsin. a. SS. Richman, Assistant -l'rofessor of Riolory, St. Iawrence College. A b. To determine the energy budget of the predominant Cladoceran and Copepod species of the primary consumerate level in Lake Winnebago. c. The algae are labeled with radioactive carbon-1ll, to determine energy input. The expended energy is calculated by converting oxygen consumed to calories used. Food organisms and herbivores are anaiyzed for energy content by means of a miniature bomb calorimeter. Life histories are studied to determine growth and reproduction rates. 17. Natural radiocarbon determination of absolute sedimentation rates and pollen stratigraphic analysis of environments of deposition. a. ud. Gordon Ogden III, Associate Professor of Botany, Ohio. Wesleyan University. 3 b. To determine sedimentation rates in the Great Lakes areg. c. Carbon content is determined, followed by radiocarbon determination. Samples are cored in selected lakes in the Great Lakes area. Between 20 and 0 radiocarbon determinations are made on each core. 18. Fossil plant pigments as indices to productivity in acquatic and semi-acquatic habitats. ; a. E. Gorham, Associate Professor, Botany Department, University of Minnesota. b. To test the value of productivity indices such as fossii plant pigments over a wide range of environments. 35-377, O—64——_26 386 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 c. A number of studies are carried out on lakes, bogs, and swamps, mostly in the Minnesota area. Stratigraphic sediment sare analyzed to elucidate lake evolution. C. Office of Naval Research The Office of Naval Research sponsors a wide variety of Great Lakes research in most of the "big ten" schools in that area, These projects are sponsored in the geophysics, biology, and geography branches of ONR. Although these projects are classified properly as basic research,ultimate application can be seen in most cases, and oceanography is also generally enhanced by this "laboratory" study of lakes as test tubes for oceanic application. 1. Determination of currents in the Great Lakes. a. J. C. Ayers, Great Lakes Research Division, University of Michigan. b. To evolve a mathematical method for determination of currents in deep lakes. ec. Computations of dynamic heights have been evolved in manner very similar to those used jn the deo) occans. ‘lhese have been simplified in turn by independent determination of expansive effects of temperature and compressive effects of pressure. Also, new tables have been prepared,directly readable to 0.1° centigrade. The method has been applied in Lake Huron. 2. Aerial sensing of environmental conditions on the ground. a. R. A. Bryson, University of Wisconsin b. To improve capabilities of determining environmental conditions on the ground by rapid aerial survey methods. ec. A wide variety of air-borne sensors is being used to survey an area extending from Wisconsin and the Great Lakes to the Arctic, emphasizing the thermal and ice regimes of lakes and vegetation as major indicators of environmental conditions. Relationships are determined between environmental factors especially on a seasonal basis in order to sense some conditions from other conditions. d. $90,000 *3. Map transformation studies. Bo» Wile Jha Tobler, University of Michigan. b. To investigate map distortions of lines, angles and areas. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 387 ec. Digital computer techniques are applied to investigations and correction of these distortions. The projection areas are evaluated to determine overall probable error envolved in a particular map; projection distortion is corrected in connections with problems of changing map scales. a. $17,000 h. Compilation of freezing and thawing dates for the Great Lakes and surrounding arcas,. a. lt. A. Ragotzkie, University of Wisconsin. b. To study the freezing and thawing of lake ice as events in the annual heat cycle of a lake. To determine dates useful as climatic indicators. ce. All available information is compiled and combined with field studies to determine the exact dates of freeze-ups and break-ups of lake ice in Wisconsin, Minnesota, Michigan, and Canada. This compilation is published in a report to the Office of Naval Research. 5. Studies on orientation and of migration of fishes. a. A. D. Hasler, Professor of Zoology, University of : Wisconsin. . b. Yo study sensory mechanisms to which fish respond in the Great Lakes environment. c. The role and importance of chemical sensors in the lives of fishes are investigated, primarily in the laboratory. The ability of fishes to respond to various fresh-water and marine odors is studied as are sound production and perception in fish. Concentrations of fishes are mapped in the Great Lakes area using echo sounding instruments. #6, Metabolism of insect pests. a. W. H. McShan, Professor of Zoology, University of Wisconsin. b. To study RNA (ribonucleic acid) content of several species of fresh water zooplankton, in order to relate this factor to trophic level and primary productivity. c. The electron microscope is used to study insect thoracic or flight muscle. Intact tissue and particulates are studied. Chemical composition and enzymatic properties of the partieles are evaluated. 388 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 7. Lake Erie geological studies, a. H. J. Pincus, Department of Natural Resources, Ohio State University. b. To study the short erosion and sediment transport in Lake Erie. c. 3 River at Louisville, Kentucky. _ 3:15—SEILHEIMER, J. A. Southern Colorado State College. The dynamics of potamoplankton populations in the Ohio River at Louisville, Kentucky, ah _ 1961-1962. . 3:30—COOK, GROVER W. U.S. Public Health Service, Chicago. The plankton and benthie fauna of Lake Michigan's southern basin, 3:45—SCARCE, LEROY E. U.S. Public Health Service, Chicago. A limnological study in the distribution of the bacterial flora of Lake Michigan. 4:00—Annual Business Mecting of ASLO, Auditorium A, Angell Hall. SATURDAY MORNING, JUNE 15 Session V. Biology (cont.) and Water Resources Invited Papers: } Section A. Angell Hall, Auditorium C. LYLE BE. CRAINE presiding. 9:00—RENN, CHARLES E. The Johns Hopkins University. Biologists as organi- zation men in water resources. 9:30—LACKEY, JAMES B. University of Florida. The scientist and marine water resources. 10;00—BERGER, BERNARD B. U.S. Public Health Service, Washington, D.C. Scientists and water quality research. 10:30—OEMING, LORING F. Michigan Water Resources Commission. Water resources manapement—the scientist's contribution. 11:00—POSTON, H. W., W. Q. KEHR and C. R. OWNBEY. U.S. Public Health Service, Chicago. Scientific research and water ‘quality management. Contributed Papers, Biology (continucd): Section B. Angell Hall, Auditorium D. GEORGE H. LAUFF presiding. 9:00—DAVIS, CHARLES C. Western Reserve University. Hatching mechanism in the cgys of aquatic invertebrates. 9:15—PARKER, RICHARD A. Washington State Univeristy. Some effects of photoperiod and temperature on daphnid reproduction. 9:30—ANDERSON, W. H. L. and W. L. L:ESPERANCE. University of Michi- yan. An cconometric model of the market for yellow perch. — 9:45-—FABER, DANIEL J. University of Wisconsin, Larval fish taken with tow: nets in the open water of a small northern Wisconsin lake. 10:00—CHIANDLER, DAVID C. University of Michigan. Burrowing maylly - nymphs in western Lake Erie previous to 1947. 10:15—-WOOD, KENNETH G. Thiel College, Greenville, Pa. The bottom fauna of western Lake Erie, 1951-52. 10:30——BRITT, N. WILSON. Ohio State University. Some changes in the bottom fauna of the island area of western Lake Erie in the decade 1953-1963, with special reference to the aquatic insccts. 11:;00—CARR, JOHN F. and J. K. HILTUNEN. U.S. Bureau of Commercial Fisheries, Ann Arbor. Changes in the bottom fauna of Lake Eric, west of the* islands, 1930-1961. : 11:15—DENDY, J. 8. Auburn University, Alabama. Observations on ecology of : ryozoans in farm ponds. 11:30—DORRIS, TROY C. and B. J. COPELAND. Oklahoma State University. Chlorophyll in oil refinery effluent-holding ponds. : - 11:43—COLE, GERALD A. and JOHN G. WEISE. Arizona State University. - Calanoid copepods from autumnal temporary ponds in Arizona. Molnar ragysae): iF NM WESe 2) cee a Pitie: " . sy whe Lh + ebitayio Jt fd GHA fi ttt ele FRats 7M etal ~ £ Hi erie to cent APPENDIX 5 OCEANOGRAPHY—THE TEN YEARS AHEAD, SUBMITTED BY HON. JAMES H. WAKELIN, JR., ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE NAVY, INCLUDING LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TO SPEAKER McCORMACK, DATED JULY 26, 1963, AND SIGNED BY DR. JEROME B. WIESNER 425 MOH 7 ~ OCEANOGRAPHY The Ten oan Alead, A LONG RANGE NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PLAN 1963 - 1972 INTERAGENCY COMMITTEE ON OCEANOGRAPHY of the FEDERAL COUNCIL FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY United States of America ICO PAMPHLET NO. 10 JUNE 1963 427 428 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 FEDERAL COUNCIL FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY JEROME B. Wiesner, Chairman Director, OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY HAROLD BROWN Director of Defense Research and Engineenng DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE J. HERBERT HOLLOMON Assistant Secretary for Science and Technology DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE BOISFEUILLET JONES Special Assistant to the Secretary for Health and Medical Affairs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE Joun C. CALHoun, JR. Science Adviser to the Secretary DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR RAGNAR ROLLEFSON - (Observer) Director, Office of International Screntific Affairs DEPARTMENT OF STATE GLENN T. SEABORG Chairman ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION ALAN T. WATERMAN Director NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION JAMEs E. WEBB Administrator NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION WILLARD COCHRANE Director, Agricultural Economics DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE EMER B. Staats - (Observer) Depruty Director BUREAU OF THE BUDGET N. E. Hacasy - (Observer) Administrator FEDERAL AVIATION AGENCY Epwarb WENK, JR. (Executive Secretary) Technical Assistant to the Director OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INTERAGENCY COMMITTEE ON OCEANOGRAPHY James H. WaKELIN, JR., Chatrman Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Research and Development) DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE RADM H. Arnotp Karo Director, U.S. Coast. and Geodetic Survey DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE DonaLp L. McCKERNAN Director, Bureau of Commercial Fishenes DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR RADM R. D. ScHMIDTMAN Chief, Office of Operations U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Harve J. CARLSON Assistant Director for Biological and Medical Sciences NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION Harry G. Hanson Associate Chief, Bureau of State Services Public Health Service DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE Joun N. WOLFE Chief, Environmental Sciences Branch Division of Biology and Medicine ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION I. E. WALLEN Assistant Director for Oceanography Museum of Natural History SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Observers: RAGNAR ROLLEFSON Director, Office of International Scientific Affairs , DEPARTMENT OF STATE ATHELSTAN SPILHAUS Chairman, Committee on Oceanography NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES E. L. DILLon Budget Examiner BUREAU OF THE BUDGET EpwARD WENK, JR. Technical Assistant to the Director OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY RosBert B. ABEL (Secretary) Assistant Research Coordinator Office of Naval Research DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 429 CONTENTS TRGIREWIGIRG! j ccnossboocabobldeadeoasadoneo so 0censeaonse sasBonc aed ouoosscbadadoDSoddeoneooHdoodEbooEEorcEcabeopneEcacadeodcosdesoas” y SHREW aSES Le spoenee eceocseee soe er cece doe Ss8cs 389-8000.) a8 90r code San 886—/ bod acu seondh sae 65350856 be oseass5-8-60=n vl SUTTER? + sonscssnoosSehensensssabeainee sneuses 55 s39904450000003000900000000 = Jase aoRee dace 5¢.40-15:'.8asuedacsesSoceaspeseocNeGGer 1 Chapter I — INTRODUCTION ..........0........cccccccccccceeeeceeeeeeeerensesecscecusnoosecsecsnesteensestsessess 4 Aw. Why, a) Long-Range Plan?) ...20 0-2-2... | ssaeuiBuq yo sdio> ‘Awiy 1 "Ng 124DEN\A Ppupny 4sD0> S40440 (%T1) SOBD %T) OUlw 9 = puosu4S Vb) (%T) 2285 40 Ayayos (%tT) ‘4°S'N "Kyadoig 4O U0ljd2401q “> (% |) upiuosyyiws - f (%@) Aeaing j095 © (%z) seuwne - (%€) ‘wo Absouq d1woyy * (%) 221!MaS 4APPH “GN © a (%T1) Adaing 24epo0es B {SPO ‘fp — (%S 1) ¥st4 “wwoong “¢ (%2Z) vouppunoy @2UGIDS |DUOIION “7 (%9€) AAPN “L WwoOS Ad ADNIOV AG (%T1) shening (Yv 1) se21mes (%) 224n0say °S'N “H (%+) 4PPH “SN °| 4 | non © O (%8) 42H ‘e24n0sey “S'f) (%8) Petiddy 44109H @21NOS9Y UDBIO PjIOMA © (%61) 412° @I1INOS9Y UDBIO PIO * (%9L) paiiddy esueyeq (%9€) esueyeq (%9G) e2ue!sg >1spg qiaovua 46 480 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Smithsonian C.&G.S. (<1%) We. Bue (<1%) NAVY (36%) Figure 2 - Federal Support of Research 47 481 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 uonouny fq ia3png OONALL Aen - ¢ aun31y - (497) Aydns6ouna 9 |}!W (%ve) ,424Desey r1SDg,, AHdVYSONVIDO JISva JISVA 48 35-377 O—64-——32 482 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 OTHERS OCEAN RESOURCES (ye) (7.5%) U.S. RESOURCES (13.5% SAFETY AT SEA (11%) DEFENSE (57%) SERVICES (11%) Figure 4 - National Instrumentation Budget, Comparative Years 49 PROGRAM—1965 suv1i0d 4JO SNOITIIW NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 484 €961 1ospng dydei80uRI09 JeUONeN - g andy (46t) s98D “Pa $9 22'YO "PY ewHOW upiuosyyIWS SSIPIIM 8 S8ueYysiy Hods ng soulyyng “AING “"|Oa5) Das 4D Ajajyos po 0. A *Apadoig 40 uoly>a401q *y P4bo0g uolso1y YdDeg Auiy "Ng 484Da\YQ Ppipny jspo0>5 (461) sheaing uvax9 = ‘f¢ (%40Z) 8221495 uDaxD || (4) 4IPPH “SN OD (49) 4sP2H ‘se2unosay ‘sn “4 | (%6) Petiddy ysoeHq ‘S2ouN0sey UDB2Q POM “37 (%€) 2214485 YyyoDeH “qng ° (4S 4422H (%py) wop ABsauz s1woyy - ‘sa2INOSaY UD2DIQO PLLOM ‘q | q 9 S (YTL) YSty “wwo yng “py (4EZ) paddy ‘asuajeq ‘5 | ae (%GL) vouwpunoy aouaisg jouoyoy “¢ (“vpp) esuejyeq g a (4 L (%€) 48410 (%61) Aeaing 2yepoedg B 4sD05 ° eee (4b) AON ° WwoOS Ad AINIOV AG 51 485 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Das 4D Ajajyos Apadoig 40 u01}>8401g (%48) sAeaing (4OL) $22!1485 (%gG) e2unosay ‘sp (4) 441P2H “S'/N (%48) 44JP2H ‘e24nosay “s'f (4T1) paddy ysyoeH ‘saoinosay UuD9309 PHHOAA (%vZ) 4s122H sesinosay uD3s30 PHOM (%H§ 1) parddy ‘esuejeq (%7e) asuajaq (%4LS) 22uaiss sispg 1WOS Ad 1 >) | | Ho 2) eh 4 45 ZL61 128png ydessouvasQ jeuONeN - 1 9un3ry al a Vv ‘PA JO O21HO ‘Py eWUDW UuDIUOSYFIWIS OHIPIIM 8 Seeysiy Hods ng ssaaulBuq yo sdioy Auny "Ng 124{DI\\ papns 4sD05 (%T) $49440 (%&) Aeaing jo29 * (%€) soulwng * (%+T) woy Absauq D1woyy © (%+E) 221495 YAPPH “4Nd © (%g) Aeaing 242epo0asd -g 4sD0D © (%@Z) ysig “wun, (%9T) vowopunoy aduaicg jOUOI}DAY © (%TE) AACN © ADNIOV Ad -nowrunor © J99|4 Wydessoueva2O [euONeN - g s1n3Iy (871) (9Z) TL6L £961 (s404 0007 4240) Fry) (S404 0007-0001) wnig3aw (suoy QOOL 42PUn) TIVWS itn) Ke) > | a Military Surv 1390T FY 62 Jan 62 Navoceano Mar 64 Basic Res 1350T FY 63 Jan 63/Scripps Jan 65 Basic Res 1350T FY 63 Jan 63] U. of Wash. Jan 65 ——— aK sel Ocean Surv 2500T FY 63 Jan 63) Navoceano Mar 65 oTTS > Coastal Surv 4100T FY 64 Jan 64 Navoceano Mar 66 = — Ocean Surv 2500T FY 64 Jan 64 Navoceano Mar 66 —=— eel COAST SURVEY Coastal Surv 3000T FY 59 ——— | USCGS SURVEYOR Coastal Surv 750T FY 61 June 61 Nov 62} PEIRCE Coastal Surv 750T FY 61 June 61 Jan 63 WHITING Coastal Surv 1600T FY 62 Oct 62 June 64 = Ocean Surv 3800T FY 62 June 62 June 64 Coastal Surv 1600T FY 63 Oct 62 Oct 64 — Ocean Surv 3800T FY 63 Oct 62 Dec 64 —=_— Sa Coastal Surv 1600T FY 64 May 64 May 66 Coastal Surv 750T FY 64 May 64 May 66 Coastal Surv 750T FY 64 May 64 May 66 Wire Drag Auxiliary 100T FY 64 Wire Drag Auxiliary 100T FY 64 18 520 TABLE 95 ARRIVAL OF NEW SHIPS—Continued NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 BY AGENCY FUNDED FY 61 FY 62 FY 63 FY 64 FY 65 FY 66 BUREAU OF COMM. | FISHERIES Fisheries Res. 1,000T FY 61 May 61 Nov 62 ALBATROSS IV Fisheries Res. 650T FY 62 Mar 63 June 64 | Fisheries Res. 700T FY 62 Dec 62 Dec 63 Fisheries Res. 150T FY 62 Dee 63 Dec 64 Fisheries Res. 800T FY 63 June 63 | June 64 Fisheries Res. 1,200T FY 63 Sep 63 Mar 65 Fisheries Res. 150T FY 63 EE BUREAU OF MINES Mineral Res. 1,000T FY 64 ~< NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION Basic Res. 2100T FY 60 Woods Hole Jan 63 > ATLANTIS 0 Antarctic Res. 4600T FY 61 Nov 60 Nov 61/(Conv) USNS ELTANIN Basic Res. 400T FY 61 Duke University ——__ Basic Res. 336T FY 61 Stanfor¢ University (Conv) | TE VEGA Basic Res. 25T FY 62 U. Mich. INLAND SEAS ——_>— Basic Res. 425T FY 62 U. of Mich. |(Conv) OO Basic Res. 735T FY 62 Texas A&M (Conv) ALAMINOS <> Basic Res. 1780T FY 62 <«—_——+> (Conv) ANTON BRUUN Basic Res. 735T FY 63 Miami (Conv) | PILLSBURY

Basic Res. 735T FY 63 Oregon State (Conv) —_—$__>— Basic Res. 100T FY 63 Johns Hopkins —-—=_ Basic Res. FY 63 ee (Cony) Basic Res. FY 64 ee 19 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 meet the needs and capabilities of the institu- tions contracting to perform ONR research. These vessels are listed below. ACONA Oregon State 154T (new) FY 1959 University HOH University of 90T (conv) FY 1962 Washington KYMA New York Uni- 90T (conv) FY 1962 versity TRIDENT University of 820T (conv) FY 1962 Rhode Island AGASSIZ Scripps Institution 400T (conv) FY 1962 of Oceanography With these added to the ICO construction pro- gram, it is evident that not only is the category of basic research receiving much-needed atten- tion, but that, where appropriate, steps have been taken to meet promptly the immediate needs of growing establishments by making available smaller craft through the medium of conversions. Present planning anticipates that ship con- struction will reach a peak in the next few years followed by a gradual decrease, as the present backlog is overcome, to a level which will sus- tain normal growth. Although the shipbuilding program is ex- pensive and accounts for a large part of the total national program, the U. S. cannot expand its oceanographic activities until we have sufficient modern ships to meet the demands of research and technology. An adequate shipbuilding pro- gram is of major importance to the National Oceanographic program. D. SURVEYS The Survey Program of the Federal Gov- ernment for FY 1964 is budgeted at $20.23 mil- lion. This represents an increase of $1.74 mil- lion over FY 1963. The largest portion of this represents increased deep ocean work of the Naval Oceanographic Office brought about pri- marily by the delivery of a new ship. Surveys for FY 1964 are, for the purposes of this report, separated into two categories: Ocean Surveys, and those oceanographic (includ- ing hydrographic) surveys which are related to other missions of the various agencies but do not fall within the rather narrow definition of "ocean-wide surveys" originally proposed by 20 o21 NASCO. Ocean Surveys are the first attempt of any country to undertake the systematic survey of the entire deep ocean. The surveys are ac- curately controlled navigationally, and include mapping the shape of the sea floor; the magnetic and gravity properties of the deep sea; the phys- ical, chemical, and biological characteristics of the water; geological characteristics of bot- tom sediments; and the meteorology of the over- lying atmosphere. After a slow start in FY 1964, and a modest increase to a total of $1.78 million in FY 1963, this program undergoes more than a three-fold increase in FY 1964 to a total of $6.04 million. This is due to several factors. The first of these is the assignment of the additional C&GS Ships SURVEYOR and PEIRCE to full-season operations within the Ocean Surveys concept. The second is that both that agency and the Naval Oceanographic Office are increasing their participation in the Ocean Survey Program by planning more time of other large ships for this program. The third factor is the increased effort of the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries in placing biologists aboard survey ships, and the beginning of the Geological Survey's partici- pation in this program. It is particularly noteworthy that, while the FY 1964 support for Ocean Surveys has in- creased by $4.26 million, there has actually been a decrease of nearly $2 million in total funds for other mission-oriented surveys. This indicates that the total survey effort is expand- ing toward Ocean Surveys rather than existing mission-oriented work. The major expansion in the Nation's Ocean Survey Plan will occur in FY 1965. During that year, the Navy's first vessel specifically designed and constructed for this purpose will begin operations, as will the two such vessels of the Coast and Geodetic Survey. The International Cooperative Investigations of the Tropical Atlantic are described in Annex A to this report. As an indication of the level of effort for FY 1964, it is estimated that the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries will support the Investigations from its research funds at a level of about $1.1 million. ONR is planning to support private oceanographic institutions in this expedition at about $0.2 million, the C&GS has one ship participating in FY 1963, and the Coast Guard will have a ship in the FY 1964 phase. The Oceanographic Office, though not participating with ships, is providing services in assisting the planning. The total cost of the U. S. portion of this program in FY 1964 is es- timated at less than $2 million. 922 Department of Defense U. S. Navy. Oceanographic surveys are carried out for the Department of Defense by the Naval Oceanographic Office. The major portion of its effort is directed toward military surveys, but for FY 1964 considerably more ef- fort will be devoted to the Ocean Survey effort. The TANNER and REQUISITE will be engaged part-time in coastal hydrographic surveys inthe Atlantic, with major emphasis inthe generalareas of the Windward Passage and the North Atlantic. A portion of the time of each of these vessels will be spent on ocean surveys within the frame- work of the term as defined by the Ocean Sur- veys Advisory Panel of the ICO. The effective- ness of these two ships will be increased by their working as a team throughout most of the field season. Similarly, the MAURY and SER- RANO will be involved in comparable surveys in the Pacific. The two major oceanographic survey ships of the Naval Oceanographic Office, the SAN PABLO and the REHOBOTH, will be carrying out military project surveys in the Atlantic and the Pacific respectively. It is pos- sible that these two ships will also be able to contribute to the Ocean Survey Program during the working season, but this will be determined by the rate at which the required military sur- veys progress. The remaining three ships, the PREVAIL, SHELDRAKE, and LITTLEHALES, will be engaged in military project survey in the Atlantic. Survey funds planned for the Navy in FY 1964 total just over $11 million as follows: TABLE 6 Costs of Operation and Technical Manning of the Survey Ships (Thousands) TANNER $ 1,914 MAURY 1,914 SAN PABLO 1,260 REHOBOTH 1,260 SERRANO 758 PREVAIL 712 REQUISITE 672 SHE LDRAKE 672 LITTLEHALES 320 New Vessel (AGS 214) 840 Total $10,322 Support for analysis, interpretation, and related activies for ocean surveys. 873 Total for surveys $11,195 21 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Data from the above activities will be made available to the scientific community through the National Oceanographic Data Center. It is not possible at this time to ascertain exactly the amount of time that these ships will be en- gaged in Ocean Survey work as compared with coastal hydrography and other missions. It is estimated, however, that the TANNER, MAURY, REQUISITE, and SERRANO will devote 20 per cent of their time to the Ocean Survey Program, and the REHOBOTH 10 per cent. For the pur- poses of this report, the ocean survey funding for the Oceanographic Office is $.873 million for data processing and other costs related to this program and $1.178 million for ship time for a total of $2.051 million out of a total survey item of $11.195 million. Prior high priority commitments prevent the Oceanographic Office from participating directly in the International Cooperative Inves- tigations of the Tropical Atlantic, but as in FY 1963 this agency will contribute to this effort through special compilation and printing activi- ties for which funds are not earmarked specifi- cally. The Office of Naval Research will support some of the activities of the private oceano- graphic institutions taking part in the Interna- tional Cooperative Investigations of the Tropical Atlantic. An estimated $200 thousand will be spent on this research effort by the private in- stitutions in FY 1964. Department of Interior Bureau of Commercial Fisheries. The Bureau of Commercial Fisheries plans an in- crease of $105 thousand over the $20 thousand budgeted in FY 1963 for its part in the Ocean Survey Program. These funds will cover the cost of placing biologists and special equipment items aboard the ships of other agencies engaged in such surveys. Although BCF does not have ships to carry out Ocean Surveys of its own, the degree of cooperation with the Oceanographic Office, the Coast and Geodetic Survey and the Coast Guard has been high, and biologists are routinely placed aboard the ships of these agencies. Geological Survey. The Geological Survey budgeted no funds in FY 1963 under the heading of surveys. For FY 1964, this agency has in- cluded $15 thousand under this category. By FY 1964 it is expected that the Ocean Survey Program will have progressed sufficiently that additional equipment will be needed for special NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 studies being planned by the Geological Survey. The $15 thousand will provide for the equipment to be used aboard ships of the Naval Oceano- graphic Office and the Coast and Geodetic Sur- vey. Department of Commerce Coast and Geodetic Survey. The Coast and Geodetic Survey will receive a modest increase of $313 thousand in survey funding for FY 1964. Two new Class II ships, the PEIRCE and WHITING, are scheduled for delivery late in FY 1963 as replacements for existing hydro- graphic survey ships. These ships will be equipped to carry out both charting and oceano- graphic operations. After shake-down cruises in the Gulf of Mexico, both will be assigned to the East-Coast with one of them operating full- time on oceanographic-hydrographic surveys of the continental shelf, while the other will be en- gaged primarily in coastal! charting activities with some supplementary oceanographic work. The first Class I ocean survey ship, the OCEA- NOGRAPHER, will be delivered in FY 1964. It is planned to start operations with this ship on Ocean Surveys in the North Pacific, continuing the work of the PIONEER while that ship goes to the Indian Ocean. The sum of $200 thousand has been budgeted specifically for the additional costs to be incurred in the latter half of FY-1964 in operating the PIONEER in the International Indian Ocean Expedition. During the first half of FY 1964 the PIONEER will continue its ocean survey opera- tions in the North Pacific between Hawaii and the Aleutians. In addition to the underway op- erations, a study of the current structure in the boundary area between the sub-arctic and cen- tral Pacific water masses is planned. Bottom photography, sediment studies and cooperative projects will be carried out with several other agencies and private institutions. The SUR- VEYOR will perform similar underway opera- tions to the west between Midway and the Aleu- tians and will run a line of synoptic stations with the PIONEER. She will operate in areas of par- ticular interest to the Navy. In both FY 1963 and FY 1964, increasing amounts of oceanographic survey work are being added to the planned operations of the other major ships. The EXPLORER, in FY 1964, will carry out combined oceanographic and hydro- graphic surveys in the Cape Hatteras area, working within the general framework of the study of the Continental Shelf of the East Coast in which the Geological Survey and the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution are cooperating. 22 523 The Duke University Marine Laboratory will cooperate in these studies. The PATHFINDER will conduct primarily hydrographic surveys in the Hawaiian Islands area and in the Gulf of Alaska. The HYDROGRAPHER in FY 1964 will be carrying out combined oceanographic and hydrographic operations in the Flordia Straits. The survey activities of the Coast and Geo- detic Survey, in FY 1964, reflect the continuing trend of adding more oceanographic survey work to the charting activities of the major ships, and of increasing the amount of ship time devoted to the ocean survey program. Department of Health Education and Welfare Public Health Service — Water Supply Pol- lution Program. Surveys undertaken in con- junction with water pollution represent marine studies requested in federal enforcement actions underway in Puget Sound and Raritan Bay, and in the development of comprehensive water pol- lution control programs for the drainage basins of the Delaware River, Columbia River, Susque- hanna River, Chesapeake Bay, and the tri-state metropolitan area (New Jersey, New York, and Connecticut). A special project will be initiated to develop fundamental physical, chemical, and biological data on the interactions of pollutants and the marine environment, and the effects of water movements, marine geology, and similar factors on the dispersion and fate of pollutants in estuarine and near-shore waters. Radiological Health Program. Public Health Service plans to continue its surveillance activities in estuaries in relation to the dis- charge of radioactive materials from nuclear energy facilities. The purpose of these studies is to determine in marine waters and in sea- food the levels of radioactivity resulting from nuclear weapons testing and other sources in order to arrive at a better understanding of the fate of radionuclides in the marine environment. Results of these studies may disclose indicator organisms useful in detecting radioactive pol- lutants, as well as being useful in developing mechanisms for the removal of radioactive nuclides from the acquatic environment. Shellfish Program. In cooperation with coastal states, surveys of shellfish-growing areas will be conducted in FY 1964. Total funds for surveys to be conducted by the Public Health Service in FY 1964 amount to $600 thousand. 024 Department of the Treasury Coast Guard. The Coast Guard plans to spend $313 thousand for survey operations in FY 1964; an increase of $102 thousand over FY 1963. This includes operations of the Inter- national Ice Patrol, the Bering Sea Patrol, Polar Operations, Ocean Surveys Patrols, and the Oceanographic Unit at Washington, D. C. Other Coast Guard activities which contribute to the national survey effort are the Ocean Station Ves- sels, the Fishery Patrols, lightships, and off- shore stations. The operations of this agency are closely coordinated with those of the Naval Oceano- graphic Office and of the Coast and Geodetic Survey, and space aboard Coast Guard vessels will again be made available to scientists from other government agencies and the private insti- tutions. Smithsonian Institution Through the activities of the National Sort- ing Center, the Smithsonian Institution will ob- tain and process biological collections from many ships engaged in the Ocean Surveys Pro- gram. TABLE 7 Summary of Proposed Support for Oceanographic Surveys FY 1964 (Thousands) Other Ocean Mission- Sur- Oriented veys Surveys Total Naval Oceano- $2,051 $ 9,144 $11,195 graphic Office Coast and Geodetic 3,849 4,131 7,980 Survey Bureau of Com- 125 --- 125 mercial Fisheries Geological Survey 15 --- 15 Coast Guard --- 313 313 Public Health Service --- 600 600 TOTAL $6,040 $14,188 $20,228 23 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 E. MANPOWER AND TRAINING During the past year, the ICO Panel on Manpower and Training has been conducting an extensive study of the implications of an expand- ing National Oceanographic Program on the availability and employment of professionals trained in oceanography. In the same context, there was also some examination of the supply of professionals trained in sciences directly related to oceanography such as marine biology, meteorology, and geophysics. The general situation in oceanographic manpower, however, appears reasonably clear. While opinions differ as to the extent of available manpower in different fields of ocea- nography, the study has verified the existence of a shortage of scientists trained in the two areas given intensive study, physical oceanog- raphy and marine taxonomy. Of course the lat- ter field is much smaller in terms of manpower requirements. If the numbers of graduate degrees cur- rently awarded in these fields may be considered as an index of the number of scientists being trained, one may conclude that a much greater training effort will be necessary to meet the requirements of the research programs pro- posed for the close of the decade of the 1960's. The two specific fields cited should be consid- ered illustrative only. Continued study may re- veal shortages in other areas as well. The research programs currently proposed by the ICO represent, in terms of expenditures, an increase of two thirds from the FY 1962 base to FY 1964. While scientific manpower require- ments engendered by these programs are not expected to increase in exact proportion, they are expected to expand by perhaps 50 per cent over the 1962 level. Graduate schools awarded six doctorates and nine masters degrees in oceanography in academic year 1960-61, the most recent year for which national data have been reported by the Office of Education. Additional degrees were awarded in related sciences to students who can be expected to be strongly attracted to oceanographic research. This number cannot be judged with any precision with the informa- tion at hand, but the total number of doctorates awarded in related fields not requiring sub- stantial additional training for application to oceanography probably would not exceed 20 in any recent year. A similar figure for masters degrees might be 40. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 It seems clear that academic output at these levels will not by itself meet the additional re- quirements for professionally qualified personnel of the FY 1964 program. Continued expansion of in-service training programs will alleviate some of this shortage. Some improvement may also be achieved by increasing the ratio of tech- nicians to scientists in order to free scientists for more direct application of their talents to research. For future years the research and facilities programs of the National Oceanographic Program, if properly implemented with this aim in mind, could provide a good part of the seeds for the augmentation of manpower specifically trained in oceanography. For FY 1964, and for the next few years of the program, the necessary personnel to maintain effective expansion of our efforts must come in part from related science fields. There is already some evidence that this mechanism is currently proving effective; it probably will have to be more widely exploited if the program as currently planned is to be ade- quately staffed during the next two or three years. In summary, shortages of qualified person- nel now exist in some areas of oceanography. It is almost certain that for the next several years the number of personnel completing graduate training in oceanography and related fields will not satisfy the need for research personnel. In order to prevent the personnel situation from jeopardizing this program, major efforts must be made in training programs for agency per- sonnel, in the support of graduate students, in construction of training facilities, in the more effective utilization of present staffs, and, par- ticularly for the immediate situation, in the recruitment of larger numbers of individuals from other scientific fields. F. INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMS Two principal international programs in oceanography will officially be part of the FY 1964 U. S. National Oceanographic Program: the International Indian Ocean Expedition (IIOE) and the International Cooperative Investigations of the Tropical Atlantic (ICITA). Both will be continuations of efforts undertaken during FY 1963. The ICITA program will concentrate on the study of the dynamic properties of the ocean and atmosphere and the relation of these properties to the fishing potential in the tropical equa- torial belt between the east coast of South America and the west coast of Africa. Included in the program are synoptic oceanographic stations to be made by all ships taking 24 529 part. These will all initiate at the same time from the northern part of the area working south, thus giving as nearly as possible a syn- optic picture of the entire tropical Atlantic. Population and productivity studies will be made concurrently with physical and chemical inves- tigations. Between synoptic surveys, the U. S. and U.S.S.R. will occupy selected buoy stations to make current measurements. The meteoro- logical program will include satellite observa- tions. The Bureau of Commercial Fisheries, Coast & Geodetic Survey, and several private institutions supported with federal funds will represent the United States. The National Oceanographic Data Center will be the focal point for the collation of the results of these investigations. The Interagency Committee on Oceanog- raphy has designated the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries as the coordinating agency for this effort. A report describing the preliminary planning may be found in Appendix A. The International Indian Ocean Expedition, initially organized under the auspices of the Scientific Committee on Oceanic Research (SCOR), is now being coordinated primarily through the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission. All aspects of oceanography are being undertaken in this endeavor, with empha- sis on the effect of shifting monsoon conditions on the oceanic circulation and biological pro- ductivity of the area. Four general programs are being pursued. These are: (1) interaction of the sea and atmosphere, (2) description of the physical and chemical properties of the water, (3) investigation of the living population and, (4) a study of the geology and geophysics of the Indian Ocean Basin. It is expected that six U. S. ships and one R5D aircraft will participate in the MOE during FY 1964. Five of the ships and the aircraft will be from civilian research institutions sup- ported for the most part by funds from the Na- tional Science Foundation and the Office of Naval Research. The sixth ship will be from the Coast & Geodetic Survey. Several international working group meet- ings will be held during this period to organize an effective mechanism for processing, analyz- ing, and interpreting the great quantity of data obtained and for making them available to all participants. The U. S. participation in the IIOE is being coordinated by the National Science Foundation. A detailed report of the program will be found in Appendix B. 526 Numerous smaller international programs will be undertaken cooperatively between the U. S. and several Latin American countries. In general, these will be regional studies involving neighboring countries wishing to concentrate on problems too large for the capability of any in- dividual country. Examples of this type of pro- gram are: (1) General Circulation of the South- west Atlantic, (2) Investigation of the Brazil Current, (3) El Nifio Study, and (4) Catalog of marine plankton in the Mediterranean. G. FACILITIES The construction and improvement of shore facilities to support oceanography is being con- tinued in FY 1964 at a level of about 12.2 per cent over that of the previous year. The recom- mended expenditure for Government and non- Government activities is $10.3 million. Although the total increase is small, the facilities budget includes $7.3 million to support research facility construction for universities and other private institutions to increase their capabilities for training of oceanographers. The balance of $3.05 million will be used for the expansion and improvement of existing federal facilities and for a modest program of new laboratory con- struction. , In FY 1964 the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries plans to begin constructing, or will have under construction, four new research lab- oratories. In the spring of 1963 construction will start on a new Biological Laboratory at La Jolla, California, for research on tuna, sar- dines, anchovies, other related species, and oceanography of the California Current and eastern tropical Pacific. In the summer of 1963 work will start on a new biological laboratory at Seattle, Washington, which will be concerned with the ocean-phase of salmon life history and other fishery problems of the eastern North Pacific. About the same time, construction of a biological laboratory at Milford, Connecticut, for specialized studies on large-scale artificial culture of shellfish and other marine organisms will commence. Construction will also get underway on a Radiobiology Laboratory at Beaufort, North Carolina, where the effects of radioactive isotopes on marine life will be studied. The Geological Survey will establish a lab- oratory on the West Coast for research in ma- rine geology and geophysics. The Bureau of Mines will house its marine resources and en- gineering staff in temporary West Coast facili- ties during fiscal year 1964. Plans will be formulated for the design and construction of a 25 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 permanent Bureau oceanographic center at a convenient location at a later date. The Coast and Geodetic Survey will improve its ship base at Norfolk, and will transfer its Seattle operations to a newly leased ship base. This latter installation is especially critical to the Coast and Geodetic Survey program. As its vessels for Ocean Surveys become available, this facility will provide the necessary logistic support for Pacific operations. The National Science Foundation has pro- grammed $7.3 million in FY 1964 in grants for new and expanded oceanographic facilities in universities and private research institutions. The FY 1964 budget for facilities construc- tion and improvement, as outlined in Table 8, will help to relieve crowded working conditions in many locations and will provide housing for entirely new research groups and for training of new oceanographers. It will also allow growth in physical plants for research in step with planned expansion in research, surveys, and ships. H. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC DATA CENTER Manpower and Training. During FY 1962, the National Oceanographic Data Center (NODC) provided personnel from its staff in support of survey operations and for reciprocal training; i.e., training of survey personnel in data proc- essing procedures (primarily from the stand- point of quality control) and the training of NODC personnel in the many phases of survey operations. In addition, the NODC has trained visiting scientists and survey personnel in data processing procedures for short term periods. During FY 1964, the NODC will increase this effort within the limits of available funds. The NODC plans to recruit sufficient personnel by FY 1964 to handle the ''data out"’ phase of its work in keeping with its policy of providing support service to the oceanographic community. International Program. In its short period of existence, the NODC has assumed responsi- bilities connected with two international pro- grams — complete responsibility for continuing the function of World Data Center A-Oceanog- raphy (WDC-A) and data processing responsi- bilities for the International Indian Ocean Ex- pedition (MOE). It has been suggested that, in addition to its data processing responsibilities to the TOE, the NODC undertake the preparation of an atlas for the Expedition under the guidance of an international board of editors composed of NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 527 TABLE 8 FACILITIES PROGRAM - FY 1964 (Thousands) Dept. - Agency Purpose DEFENSE - Total 250 Navy - Total 250 INTERIOR - Total 1,621 BCF - Total 1,290 Shellfish research laboratory, Milford, 1,165 Connecticut. Tropical Atlantic Biological Laboratory, 125 Miami, Florida. (design) GS - Total 279 West Coast laboratory for research in 279 marine geology and geophysics. BSF&W - Total 52 To expand research facilities at Marine 92 Laboratory, Sandy Hook New Jersey COMMERCE - Total 1,036 C&GS - Total 1,036 Construction of new ship base at Norfolk and acquisition of leased base in Seattle, Washington NATIONAL SCIENCE 7,300 FOUNDATION - Total Construction of facilities for physical and 7,300 biological oceanographic research and education. TREASURY - Total 50 CG - Total 50 For oceanographic units at Woods Hole. 35 For oceanographic facilities on two off- 15 shore structures. FACILITIES - TOTAL $10,257 prominent oceanographers. During FY 1964, the NODC will continue its responsibilities to the WDC-A and the IIOE and will take on new responsibilities to the IIOE within the limits of available funds. By FY 1964, the NODC expects to play a major role in the International Cooperative In- vestigations of the Tropical Atlantic. The NODC has already done preliminary work in conjunction with the Naval Oceanographic Office in this pro- gram; namely, the preparation of a provisional atlas of the environmental conditions of the area of investigation. The suggestion has been made that NODC provide data processing support to this international program. In addition, in FY 1964 the NODC hopes to initiate, in conjunction with the Canadian Oceano- graphic Data Center (CODC), a communications 528 network for receipt of oceanographic data from Arctic areas. It has been suggested that the University of Alaska might be the logical place to initiate this service. Ocean Surveys. With the acceleration of oceanographic survey programs in the next ten years, rapid communication of oceanographic data will be essential to the success of a national program in oceanography. A transmitting and receiving capability to be established at NODC and aboard ships will eliminate routine process- ing of raw data aboard ships. Raw data can be transmitted to the NODC and by the use of com- puters it will be possible to transmit fully processed data back to the ships for analysis and planning future operations. Scientists aboard ships will no longer be in doubt as to whether they have obtained valid data, whether their sampling has been sufficient, and whether additional sampling will be required in thearea. With present techniques aboard ships, it is vir- tually impossible to have raw data reduced to meaningful information before leaving the sta- tion or area. As in the past, the NODC will assist in pre- survey planning through data analyses, data summaries for particular areas, the production of atlases, etc. Instrumentation. The NODC will evaluate the data output of existing instruments to pro- vide advice on new instrumentation, and to assist in choosing instrumentation to be purchased, through evaluating the precision of a given in- strument, quality of data obtained from the in- strument, and the requirements to be placed on the data. The NODC also will advise on, and develop methods for, recording, reducing, and storing data from present and future instrumen- tation to obtain maximum use of the output from new instruments. New Data Areas. In FY 1964, the NODC plans to develop a capability for processing radiation and ice data from space satellites. The processing of oceanographic data from satellites will be done with the cooperation of 27 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 both the National Aeronautics and Space Agency and the Weather Bureau. At the present time, both the Naval Oceano- graphic Office and the Coast and Geodetic Sur- vey have amassed a considerable backlog of bathymetric data. With retrieval systems cur- rently under development the NODC will have acquired a capability for handling these data by the end of FY 1964. At that time, the reduc- tion of this backlog may be initiated by contract with industry. IV. CONCLUSION The National Oceanographic Program for Fiscal Year 1964 provides for the further ad- vancement of the Nation's effort in the marine sciences. The experience of the past two years has been heavily drawn upon for guidance in the most productive use of the funding outlined herein. The ICO is nearing publication of its Long Range National Program, and the FY 1964 pro- gram has been prepared within the framework of this long range planning, as will future annual programs. Within the functional areas of interest, the ICO will have completed its study of the short- age of oceanographic manpower and will have outlined the problem and commenced the steps to be taken in its solution. The 1963 edition of the successful "College Curricula in Oceanog- raphy" is also expected to prove helpful in this regard. Surveys will receive special attention with promulgation of the ''Ocean Survey Plan.'"' The ICO is hopeful that dissemination of these types of information will aid communications in the marine sciences and provide better guidance for planning and conduct of projects. It is in this manner that we believe we can be most helpful in achieving the understanding of the oceans so necessary for enhancement of the national welfare. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 529 Vv BUDGET SUMMARIES 29 35-377 O— 6435 530 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM BUDGET (Thousands President's Actual Estimated Budget FY 1962 FY 1963 FY 1964 A. BY AGENCIES Defense $ 42,081 $ 55,246 $ 74,966 Commerce 23,567 24,024 24,792 Interior 14,252 16,102 18,960 National Science Foundation 17,321 18,160 25,801 Atomic Energy Commission 4,106 5,428 5,330 Health, Education, and Welfare ? 3,109 4,108 4,820 Treasury 134 511 1,152 Smithsonian Institution 217 431 531 $104,787 $124,010 $156,352 B. BY FUNCTIONAL AREAS Research $ 39,023 $ 46,955 $ 62,565 Instrumentation 3,000 6,630 8,878 Ships 34,010 38,103 47,665 Surveys 17,366 18,487 20,228 TOE 1,974 4,002 5,854 Facilities 8,904 9,223 10,257 Data Center 510 610 905 $104,787 $124,010 $156,352 30 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Actual Estimated Agency - Function FY 1962 FY 1963 DEFENSE - TOTAL $42,081 $55,246 Navy - Total 41,593 54,621 Research 15,692 19,559 Instrumentation 2,150 5,370 Ships Construction 13,600 18,153 Surveys 9,321 9,889 TOE 580 1,300 Facilities ——— == Data Center 250 350 Army - Total 488 625 Research 488 625 COMMERCE - TOTAL $23,567 $24,024 Coast & Geodetic Survey - Total 23,384 23,791 Research 196 482 Instrumentation 850 890 Ship Construction 14,185 14,400 Surveys 7,911 7,667 TIOE --- --- Facilities 162 272 Data Center 80 80 Weather Bureau - Total 133 183 Research 123 173 Data Center 10 10 Maritime Administration - Total 50 50 Research 50 50 INTERIOR - TOTAL $14,252 $16,102 BCF - Total 13,619 15,320 Research 7,409 9,747 Instrumentation --- 70 Ship Construction 3,225 2,650 Surveys --- 20 TOE --- 102 Facilities 2,905 2,651 Data Center 80 80 INDIVIDUAL AGENCY BUDGETS 31 o31 President's Budget FY 1964 $74,966 73,892 $24,792 24,559 50 $18,960 16,900 532 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 INDIVIDUAL AGENCY BUDGETS - (Contd) Agency - Function INTERIOR - TOTAL - (Contd) Geological Survey - Total Research Instrumentation Surveys Facilities Data Center BSF&W - Total Research Facilities BuMines - Total Research Instrumentation Ship Construction NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION - TOTAL Reserach Ship Construction TOE Facilities Data Center ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION - TOTAL Research Data Center HEALTH EDUCATION & WELFARE - TOTAL PHS - Total Research Surveys Facilities Office of Education - Total Research TREASURY - TOTAL Surveys Instrumentation Facilities Data Center SMITHSONIAN - TOTAL Research 32 Actual FY 1962 $217 217 President's Estimated Budget FY 1963 FY 1964 $ 494 $ 1,304 74 520 24 480 Be 15 a 279 one 10 238 344 238 292 = 52 50 412 50 224 ae 88 so 100 $18,160 $25,801 8,080 11,860 2,900 3,500 2,600 3,000 4,500 7,300 80 141 $ 5,428 $ 5,330 5,418 5,312 10 18 $ 4,108 $ 4,820 _4,058 __4,770 1,558 4,170 700 600 1,800 = 50 50 50 50 ssi $1,152 211 313 300 769 Beas 50 oe 20 $431 $531 431 531 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 533 APPENDIX A THE INTERNATIONAL COOPERATIVE INVESTIGATION OF THE TROPICAL ATLANTIC Prepared by Vernon E. Brock, International Coordinator, ICITA BACKGROUND In early 1961, two programs were proposed for oceanographic and fishery studies in the Gulf of Guinea: 1. A study of the demersal fisheries off the west coast of Africa, by the Commission for Technical Cooperation in Africa, South of the Sahara (CCTA). 2. An investigation of the pelagic fishes of the Gulf of Guinea by the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries (BCF). Each proposal included plans for supporting physical, chemical and marine biological stud- ies. When a request for support to the Agency for International Development (AID) by CCTA brought its program to the attention of the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries, it was pro- posed that the CCTA and BCF investigations be carried out cooperatively. In late 1961, ata meeting in Lagos, Nigeria, the details of coop- eration between these programs were formu- lated. The Bureau's proposed program was pre- sented to and accepted by the Inter-Agency Committee on Oceanography and approved by the National Academy of Sciences Committee on Oceanography. In February, 1962, the BCF held a meeting of oceanographers from the eastern United States to determine their interest in a coopera- tive investigation of the waters of the Tropical Atlantic. At this meeting a high level of interest was apparent, augmented plans for research were developed, and it was proposed that these be submitted to the Intergovernmental Oceano- graphic Commission (IOC) for consideration as an international effort. The plans were presented to the Bureau of the IOC in April, 1962, and at the suggestion of this Bureau the U.S. Department of State issued an invitation to interested Member Nations and activities of the IOC to send representatives to a Working Group Meeting in Washington, D.C. 33 The representatives met in June, 1962, and de- veloped plans for the International Cooperative Investigations of the Tropical Atlantic (ICITA) which were adopted at the Second Session of the IOC in Paris in September, 1962. Nomination of Mr. V. E. Brock of the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries as International Coordinator by mem- bers of the International Coordination Group for the ICITA was approved by the Secretariat of the IOC. The ICITA plans developed at the Working Group Meeting in June, 1962, and adopted by the IOC involves mid-winter and mid-summer, mul- tiple vessel, synoptic surveys of the Tropical Atlantic, from Africa to South America and from 18° N to 18° S latitude. The first of these two surveys, designated as EQUALANT I, was scheduled to start on February 15, 1963; the second, EQUALANT II, on August 1, 1963. EQUALANT I involves two 15-day synoptic surveys; separated by a 15-day period. EQUA- LANT II will involve one 15-day, multiple ves- sel, synoptic survey. Fourteen vessels from seven nations are scheduled to participate in EQUALANT I. These include five from the United States (CHAIN, CRAWFORD, EXPLORER, GERONIMO and OREGON), three from the Soviet Union (LOMO- NOSOV, ZVEZDA and OLONEZ), two from Brazil (BAEPENDI and BERTIOGA) and one each from Argentina (A.R.A. COMODORO LASERRE), Republic of Ivory Coast (REINE POKOU), Nigeria (KIARA), and Republic of Congo, Brazzaville (OMBANGO). See Figure 1 for vessel tracks, EQUALANT I. It is anticipated that 16 vessels from 10 nations will participate in EQUALANT II. These include five from the United States (ALAMINOS, GERONIMO, PILLSBURY and possibly the HORIZON and one U. S. Coast Guard vessel, three from the USSR, one each from Republic of Ivory Coast, Nigeria, Republic of Congo (Brazzaville) and possibly one each from Brazil, Argentina, Spain, Japan and Poland. In brief, the plans forthe programs common to all vessels call for oceanographic stations to 534 2000 meters, with observations to the bottom at 120 mile intervals. Standard observations from all of the 14 participating vessels during the 15-day periods include: 1. Temperature, salinity, oxygen and phos- phate at each depth sampled at each station; 2. Measurement of the rate of primary productivity using the Carbon 14 isotope tech- nique and measurement of the standing crop of zooplankton at least once each day; and 3.. Surface meteorological observations (upper air observations from selected vessels). In addition to the observations common to each vessel, a number of oceanographic, biolog- ical, and geophysical programs will be carried out by scientists from activities operating the vessels or by scientists from other United States and foreign oceanographic laboratories who will be working aboard the vessels. UNITED STATES PARTICIPATION IN THE ICITA Research Vessel Commitments EQUALANT I (February 15 to March 18, 1963) Five United States vessels are scheduled to participate in EQUALANT I; the CHAIN and CRAWFORD (Woods Hole Oceanographic Insti- tution), GERONIMO and OREGON (Bureau of Commercial Fisheries) and the EXPLORER (U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey). As may be seen from Figure 1, the GERONIMO will work in the Gulf of Guinea, the EXPLORER in the central area, the CHAIN and CRAWFORD in the western sector and the OREGON in the waters off the northeast Coast of Brazil. Special requirements imposed by various research programs aboard these vessels and logistical considerations will result in some deviations by individual ships from the sched- ules and plans as proposed by participants in the IOC Working Group Meeting. EQUALANT II (August 1 to August 15, 1963) Three U.S. vessels, GERONIMO (Bureau of Commercial Fisheries), ALAMINOS (Texas A & M) and PILLSBURY (University of Miami) are firmly committed to participate in EQUA- LANT II; two others are tentatively committed, 34 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 the HORIZON (Scripps Institution of Oceanog- raphy) and an as yet undesignated vessel oper- ated by the U.S. Coast Guard. Various U.S. Government and University activities, other than those directly concerned with vessel operations, will participate in the ICITA. CONTRIBUTIONS OF PARTICIPATING, ORGANIZATIONS U. S. WEATHER BUREAU (USWB) Marine Unit Surface Observations - Surface meteoro- logical observations will be assembled from each vessel (standard six-hour observations forwarded through Radio Central) and from other sources in the ICITA area (merchant ves- sels and shore stations) for preparation of daily forecasts. These forecasts will be transmitted to participants each day by the USWB. Where necessary, instruments will be provided, vessel personnel instructed, and log sheets and instruc- tion manuals forwarded to each vessel. Weather Bureau observers will be assigned to the EX- PLORER, GERONIMO and CHAIN. Subsequent to the ICITA field operations, the USWB will pre- pare daily summary charts of selected parame- ters for publication in the ICITA Atlas. Upper Air Observations - The upper air observing program includes NWSC supported pibal installations of the GERONIMO and CHAIN and ONSF supported radio-sonde observations from the EXPLORER. The Weather Bureau ob- server aboard each of these three vessels will be assisted by a member of the scientific party. National Weather Satellite Center Special Cloud Observations - Observations of clouds, including a simple sketch of high, middle and low cloud layers and related data, are to be made daily from each vessel. During daylight hours these observations will be made at time of TIROS satellite transits over the ICITA area. Supplemental cloud photographs will be taken by the USWB observers for corre- lation with aircraft and satellite photographs. Sea Surface Radiation Measurements - Six vessels will be provided with Suomi-Kuhn, radiometers to measure long wave radiation from the sea surface. Airplane Overflights - Overflights of the ICITA area by fully instrumented USWB NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 hurricane reconnaissance airplanes are sched- uled during the first synoptic period of EQUA- LANT I (provided that a TIROS satellite is in operation). Two DC-6 type planes will fly par- allel tracks 300 miles apart from Recife to Dakar and return the following day. If TIROS operations permit, an extra flight may be made from Dakar over the ICITA area prior to the return to Recife. BUREAU OF COMMERCIAL FISHERIES (BCF) Vessel Operation: EQUALANT I - GERONIMO and OREGON EQUALANT II - GERONIMO In an effort to standardize biological data, the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries provided each participating vessel with all necessary equipment and supplies for the determination of primary productivity and measurements of the standing crop of the zooplankton. Arrangements are being made for performing the essential Beta counting services for the primary produc- tivity measurements and for determination of the displacement volume of each zooplankton sample. Mr. Vernon E. Brock, Director, Bureau of Commercial Fisheries Biological Laboratory, Washington, D.C.,was approved by the IOC Sec- retariat as the International Coordinator for the ICITA. His duties, as defined in a resolution adopted by the IOC, include, in part, ''coordinat- ing and advising concerning schedules and pro- grams of observations... .keeping all partici- pants of the ICITA and interested organizations informed...assisting, where practicable, in procurement, loan and exchange of equipment... convening meetings of the International Coordi- nation Group and implementing the assembly and preparation of the data resulting from the ICITA for publication and preparation and pub- lication of the Atlases." U.S. COAST AND GEODETIC SURVEY (USC&GS) Vessel Operation: EQUALANT I - EXPLORER Bathymetry - Plotting sheets and instruc- tions for their use were prepared by the USC&GS for use aboard each participating vessel, both U.S. and foreign. It is anticipated that following the field surveys these plotting sheets will be 535 assembled by the NODC and copies provided to WDC/A and WDC/B. Drift Cards - Several thousand drift cards were prepared by the USC&GS for release from the ICITA vessels. Each card, laminated in plastic, carries instructions printed in English, French, Portuguese, Spanish and Russian. Tidal Data - The Tide Section of the USC&GS will assemble all tide data from sta- tions in the ICITA survey area for the period of the investigations. These data will be prepared for publication, as applicable, in both the Data Reports and the Atlas. Radio Central - The EXPLORER will serve as radio central during EQUALANTI. The communication capabilities aboard the vessel were considerably augmented by the USC&GS for the purpose. Instructions for transmitting the encoded surface weather and upper air ob- servations, as prepared through coordinated effort of the USWB, USC&GS, USCG, USAF, and NODC, were distributed to each vessel. The daily forecasts for the survey area, prepared by the USWB, will be received from NSS Wash- ington and re-broadcast from the EXPLORER. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC DATA CENTER (NODC) The NODC, at the request of the Interna- tional Coordinator, assumed responsibility for assembly and shipment of various encoding forms for oceanographic data, coding manuals, BT log sheets and instructions, meteorological reporting forms and manuals, plotting sheets for navigational purposes, and instructions for selected standardized observations. (Translated into French, Spanish and Russian by the Depart- ment of State.) Sets of each of the above were furnished to each participating vessel. In cooperation with the USC&GS, the NODC arranged the communication plan and schedules for use during EQUALANT I. In addition to the arrangements for communications among radio central (EXPLORER) and the other vessels, ar- rangements were made with Captain L. Capurro of the Argentine Hydrographic Office for trans- mission to the NODC of the data from at least one complete oceanographic station each day. Vertical sections of temperature, salinity, den- sity and oxygen will be maintained as these data are received via teletype through the Potomac River Naval Command. It was proposed by the participants in the June Working Group Meeting that the NODC 536 assemble, exchange and publish the data from both EQUALANT I and II, and prepare and ar- range for publication of the ICITA Atlas. A proposal for review by the International Coor- dination Group (the ''Editorial Board") is in preparation. U. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM (USNM) A scientist from the USNM, working from the GERONIMO, will collect and preserve fishes (shipboard trawl hauls, night lighting, and shore collections) for return to the National Sorting Center. All zooplankton samples collected dur- ing the 15-day synoptic periods are to be shipped to the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries, Biological Laboratory, Washington, D.C. After determination of displacement volumes, these samples will be sent to the National Sorting Center, USNM, for sorting, identification of organisms, and preparation of lists of such identifications. AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT (AID) Funds were provided by AID for support of the CCTA Trawling Campaign and for purchase of oceanographic equipment for use aboard the REINE POKOU (Republic of the Ivory Coast) and the KIARA (Nigeria). U.S. NAVY OCEANOGRAPHIC OFFICE (USNOO) The USNOO assisted in preparation of the salinity samples for use in intercalibrating the data from analyses made aboard the participat- ing vessels, provided bathymetric charts for use aboard the vessels and prepared and printed a compilation of charts depicting the distribution of various oceanographic proper- ties in the ICITA area. U. S. COAST GUARD Vessel Operation: undesignated vessel in EQUALANT II (commitment not firm). 36 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 DEPARTMENT OF STATE The United States State Department arranged clearance for U.S. vessels to operate in terri- torial waters of foreign nations, expedited, through arrangements with American Embas- sies, the shipment and delivery of equipment to the participating foreign laboratories and ves- sels, and translated instructions for various types of observations and sampling techniques, common to each vessel, into French, Spanish and Russian. NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS Vessel Operation: Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution - CHAIN and CRAWFORD in EQUALANT I Texas A & M - ALAMINOS in EQUALANT II University of Miami - PILLSBURY in EQUALANT II Scripps Institution of Oceanography - HORI- ZON in EQUALANT II (commitment not firm). U.S. scientists from Bingham Oceanographic Laboratory, Yale University, Institute of Marine Sciences of the University of Miami, New York University, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, and Johns Hopkins University will undertake various oceanographic, marine biological, geo- logical, and geophysical programs aboard the U.S. vessels. Oceanographers from Texas A&M will participate aboard the Argentine vessel A.R.A. COMODORO LASERRE. The details of programs summarized above relate primarily to EQUALANT I (February - March, 1963): Preliminary plans for EQUA- LANT II (August 1963) were prepared by partic- ipants in the June IOC Working Group Meeting. Preliminary plans and schedules are now in preparation; some final details must await con- sideration of results from EQUALANT I. 35-377 O - 64 (Face p. 536) CRUISE TRACKS EQUALANT I 50 eae INTERNATIONAL COOPERATIVE INVESTIGATIONS OF THE TROPICAL ATLANTIC SFlppe ® Fogol'o Sita CHAIN BUOYS ‘\ \ FEB. 15-24 ‘MAR. 18-27 x f-- aS eee) \. FEB.I5-MAR.I0 ee \. MAR.I5- APR.7 ax . CRAWFORD . LOMONOSOV Cayenne : MAR. 4- MAR.22 ‘ ‘ ~ MAR. 6-15 So Luk (Maranheo) ie : ; sae REINE POKOU LEGEND con * BRAZIL CRAWFORD CHAIN ; ha JAN.3I-FEB.2I OREGON mi . Naa, Orig cile ARGENTINA GERONIMO EXPLORER MAR. 18 -APR. 5 FEB SS Mans MARI8- APR.5 hee Sao Salvador $b — Benguela = Novo Redondo St Helena © mayer ORO WASH OC H.0.17169 FIGURE 1. bossy + fe es-e1.aaa/ \ is vS~ai AM,/ A OL AAM 81.839 acA-81.naM 4 ARES eee Tey bs 234 oe “~~, \ ) gee = a ae \ : bom Oa A Mein ak ay Logins > 4 G . ae * Bi ee Le aw Y ee na ry +e ( A sige é ie wot gb 4 et om eget OR 7: i, Air n i P, er a yr OD) Sepa . ce a Cae Pea ll ‘ a, | SRDHIRETE oe Perea: oad | de . de kane P me f ot mee Toe aad Pu Tree IeF st + sta ga ea ah Met th © Lume y ‘ 7, ‘ y i w\ Nd \ ae hy ‘ r Riywy Te wenger \ ‘ a x e : ¥ : * hoetelive ya . (DAL hme As a Ky ve - ts 2 nae gh” Recighualo SOO viee Ae ¥ ‘ We aa ef hn ORY ' } Seva ig Bonk ¥ ar vit Prgms Pol ig ay RS nag NR ty ct a il = ty --> yea: Epw Prny NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 537 APPENDIX B UNITED STATES PARTICIPATION IN THE INTERNATIONAL INDIAN OCEAN EXPEDITION Prepared by John Lyman, Indian Ocean Coordinator, National Science Foundation ORGANIZATION AND HISTORY The International Indian Ocean Expedition (IIOE) was conceived at the first meeting of the Special Committee of Oceanic Research (SCOR) of the International Council of Scientific Unions (ICSU) in September 1958. United States par- ticipation was initially planned by the Commit- tee on Oceanography of the National Academy of Sciences (NASCO). The preliminary plan was presented to the Federal Council of Science and Technology in May 1960, and approval for United States participation was announced by the White House on June 13, 1960. Scientific responsibil- ity for the United States participation was as- signed to the National Academy of Sciences - National Research Council, and the National Science Foundation was directed to plan and coordinate Federal support for United States participation in the program. At the request of the Director of the Na- tional Science Foundation, other Federal agen- cies with potential interest in the IIOE appointed representatives to serve as single points of contact and facilitate communication among the agencies. As a result of meetings of these rep- resentatives held during the summer of 1960, it was determined that the preliminary plans were inadequate to carry out the stated aims of the IIOE, particularly in the areas of biological oceanography and of air-sea interaction, and following international meetings held by SCOR at Copenhagen and Helsinki in July 1960, NASCO enlarged its Indian Ocean Expedition Panel, set up five Working Groups (Biology; Geology, Geophysics, and Bathymetry; Meteorology; Physical and Chemical Oceanography; and Ex- pedition Data, respectively), and drew up an enlarged program for U. S. participation. During the spring of 1962 it was agreed be- tween SCOR and the new International Oceano- graphic Commission (IOC) that henceforth the Secretary of the IOC would have responsibility for coordination of the IIOE. Simultaneously NASCO, as the United States adhering body to SCOR, has felt it inappropriate for it to continue 39 to coordinate the United States participation in the IIOE, and full responsibility for the United States program thus has been assumed by the National Science Foundation. FINANCIAL SUPPORT The original Presidential directive in June, 1960, provided that United States participation in the ITOE would be funded by normal budgetary process. Accordingly, the United States Navy, historically the chief Federal sponsor of basic research in oceanography through its Office of Naval Research, agreed to permit vessels whose operations it finances through research con- tracts at Scripps Institution of Oceanography, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, and Lamont Geological Observatory to undertake cruises to the Indian Ocean. Likewise the data- processing facilities at the Navy Oceanographic Office were put at the disposal of the U. S. par- ticipants, and survey vessels in the Indian Ocean were assigned to make oceanographic observa- tions in support of the IIOE. The National Science Foundation, which supports research through grants made as the result of applications proposing specific re- search projects, encouraged United States re- search institutions to submit proposals for re- search connected with the IIOE, and took steps to augment its available research funds by the inclusion of a special item for the IIOE, com- mencing with its Fiscal Year 1962 budget. Other Federal agencies have been less successful in obtaining the additional funding required to permit them to operate themselves in the Indian Ocean or to support research there in fields related to their specific missions, and in some cases the National Science Foundation has transferred funds to enable these agencies to carry out urgent programs related to the IIOE. The following tabulation, extracted from the 1963 National Oceanographic Program, 538 prepared by the Interagency Committee on Oce- anography of the Federal Council of Science and Technology (with the addition of information from the U. S. Weather Bureau) summarizes planned Federal support of the U. S. participa- tion in the ILOE through Fiscal Year 1963: THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS Fiscal Year 1961 1962 1963 USN 760 580 1,300 NSF 3 - 1,500 4,000 Bur. Com. Fish. - - 70 Weather Bureau - - 792 SCIENTIFIC PROGRAM BY DISCIPLINES The United States program for the IIOE, in accordance with the original stated aims of the expedition, is devoted to the scientific examina- tion of four great areas of interest in the Indian Ocean. The first of these concerns itself with the problems of why there is an ocean basin in the first place; what are the forces that have shaped and are continuing to shape the basin; what are the resemblances between this piece of the earth's crust and any other; and how is the basin of the Indian Ocean dissimilar from other ocean basins? The technicues used in attempting to answer these questions are pri- marily geophysical and geological, and they have been or will be employed on expeditions sent out by Scripps Institution of Oceanography, Lamont Geological Observatory, Stanford University, and Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. The second broad area of investigation in- volves the chemical and physical description of the waters of the Indian Ocean, and the study of their motions. The techniques used involve sampling of the waters in predetermined pat- terns, with respect both to horizontal distribu- tion and to vertical spacing of the samples; concurrent precise measurements of water temperature; subsequent chemical and isotopic analyses of the water samples; and determina- tion of current flow at various depths by all possible means. All United States ships partic- ipating in the IIOE will be equipped for such water sampling, and the direct measurement of current flow is the particular object of a Uni- versity of Rhode Island expedition embarked in the Scripps Institution vessel ARGO (Knauss, 1961). 40 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 The third major field of interest is the liv- ing populations, plant and animal, of the Indian Ocean. All United States ships will be equipped to sample plankton and to observe surface bio- logical phenomena, and some will measure pri- mary productivity. The research vessel ANTON BRUUN will have biological oceanography as her primary mission, and the Stanford University vessel TE VEGA will concentrate on biological and physiological studies of island groups and other shallow water areas. The fourth main area of research is con- cerned with the interaction between the ocean and the atmosphere. Several of the U. S. re- search vessels that will work in the Indian Ocean will be equipped to make upper-air me- teorological observations, but the United States will have the greater part of its meteorological effort based ashore. Observations from mete- orological aircraft of the U. S. Weather Bureau and of Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, working in connection with the International Meteorological Center that has been established with the assistance of the Government of India and the United Nations Special Fund; from me- teorological satellites; and from meteorological buoys (to be planted in the Bay of Bengal and Arabian Sea with the help of the Indian Navy), will be utilized in the program (Ramage, 1962). SCIENTIFIC PROGRAMS OF INSTITUTIONS As indicated in the preceding paragraphs, research programs of all United States vessels participating in the IIOE will contribute to at least two of the four fundamental areas of inter- est; many will contribute to three; and some to all four. For this reason, it is more practical to describe the programs in detail by setting forth the past, present, and planned cruises of each institution. SCRIPPS INSTITUTION OF OCEANOGRAPHY The Scripps Institution of Oceanography of the University of California at San Diego plans to undertake three major cruises to the Indian Ocean under the overall direction of Dr. Rob- ert L. Fisher. The first of these, called MON- SOON, was carried out by the research vessel ARGO according to the following itinerary: 1960 19 October 23 October 13 November 14 November 18 November 7 December 10 December 1961 2 January 6 January 15 January 17 January 22 January Schedule ARGO left Darwin Joined by M/V MALITA MALITA detached ARGO arrived Jakarta ARGO left Jakarta Arrived Mauritius Left Mauritius Arrived Fremantle Left Fremantle Arrived Hobart Left Hobart Arrived Wellington NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Program Geological-geophysical exploration, under Dr. R. L. Fisher. Emphasis on two-ship seismic refraction work between Darwin and Jakarta. Same program, except for seismic refraction. Emphasis on heat flow, large-volume water-sampling; topography. Same The following observations were made between Darwin and Wellington: Underway Observations Stati Precision depth recordings Gravimeter recordings Towed proton precession magnetometer recordings Insect collection, nets on superstructure Bathythermograms Surface Water Samples (for radio caesium). on Operations Seismic refraction stations Gravity cores Piston cores Heat flow measurements by temperature probe Hydrographic casts to bottom Special 2-liter water samples Midwater trawl hauls One-meter standard plankton tows 17-cm vertical microplankton hauls Bottom samples (biological) Rock dredges Large-volume water samples (c}* and trace elements) Bottom photography 539 17,000 miles 15,500 miles 16,000 miles 13,800 miles 618 29 13 stations 18 stations 18 stations In addition, some seismic reflection shooting was carried out, occasional air samples were taken, gravity was measured in ports of call; rocks and biological specimens were collected in ports of call; and large organisms were dip-netted at light lures on most night stations. The second Scripps cruise, called LUSIAD, is also being carried out by the R/V ARGO, accord- ing to the foll 1962 27 June 24 July 27 July 25 August 28 August 25 September Owing itinerary: Schedule Leave Singapore Arrive Mombasa Leave Mombasa Arrive Colombo Leave Colombo Arrive Cochin 41 Program Studies of equatorial circulation during one monsoon season, under Dr. John Knauss. Hydrographic casts and direct current observations with the aid of anchored buoys. 540 1962 Schedule 1 October Leave Cochin 26 October Arrive Port Louis, Mau. 28 October Leave Port Louis Arrive Fremantle Leave Fremantle Arrive Port Darwin Leave Port Darwin 29 November 2 December 23 December 27 December 1963 15 January Arrive Jakarta 18 January Leave Jakarta 14 February Arrive Visakhapatnam 17 February Leave Visakhapatnam 15 May Arrive Mombasa 18 May Leave Mombasa 7 June Arrive Cape Town NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Program In company R/V HORIZON: two-ship seismic refraction work under Drs. George G. Shor, R. W. Raitt, and R. L. Fisher. Bottom-sampling; hydro- graphic casts; heat-flow measurements. C }4 collections under Dr. N. W. Rake- straw. Topography, magnetism, grav- ity, underway measurements; under Dr. R. L. Fisher. Repeat equatorial circulation during second monsoon, under Dr. Knauss. Geological-geochemical-geophysical observations under Drs. George Bien, John Belshé, and Charles Keeling. The itinerary of the R/V HORIZON during LUSIAD is scheduled as follows: 1962 Schedule Leave Suez 16 September Arrive Aden Leave Aden Arrive Cochin 17 September 27 September 1 October Leave Cochin 26 October Arrive Port Louis, Mau. 28 October Leave Port Louis Arrive Fremantle Leave Fremantle Arrive Port Darwin 29 November 2 December 23 December Besides serving as consort to the R/V ARGO between Cochin and Port Darwin, the HORIZON will carry out hydrographic studies between Suez and Cochin and from Port Darwin she will return to San Diego via the Pacific. Figure 1 shows the track of MONSOON and Fig- ure 2 that of LUSIAD. The third planned Scripps cruise will be carried out by the R/V SPENCER F. BAIRD be- tween February and May 1964 under W. R. Riedel. Emphasis will be on detailed strati- graphic, geochemical, and heat flow develop- ment in the central and eastern Indian Ocean where earlier cruises have indicated areas of especial interest. Continuous underway magne- tometer recordings will also be made. LAMONT GEOLOGICAL OBSERVATORY Three cruises of the R/V VEMA have been planned as part of the IIOE. 42 Program Conduct underway reflection profiling of Red and Arabian Seas. In company R/V ARGO; two-ship seis- mic refraction work under Drs. George G. Shor, R. W. Raitt, and R. L. Fisher. Bottom-sampling, hydrographic casts, heat-flow measurements. VEMA 16 Itinerary Figures 3 and 4 27 December 59 Left Cape Town 22 January 60 Arrive Mauritius 25 January 60 Left Mauritius 22 February 60 Arrive Fremantle 26 February 60 Left Fremantle 14 March 60 Arrive Adelaide 16 March 60 Left Adelaide 31 March 60 Arrive Wellington Under the direction of C. Fray, as Chief Scientist, VEMA made the passage from Cape Town to Mauritius and from Mauritius to Fre- mantle. More than 8300 miles of topographic track was recorded with a precision depth re- corder in the southern Indian Ocean. The ex- istence of a mid-ocean ridge and associated rift valley was verified by six crossings of this topographic feature. A towed magnetometer produced a continuous plot of the totai intensity of the earth's magnetic field along the ship's 041 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 A pe YD AY Hinosr NOINN [Seer | T96T* Ue L-O96T* 490 | | £yderZourscg9 1 jo UOT NAT 4ASUT sddtaog NOOSNON oer, ayeutxouddy 43 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 542 OSuy-SaGNis TWid3es WOZIwOH -STONAS Wid3ds % ws Z ons Udi HONauL WvIS3NOON! 4O $310N4S 2113N9VA ONY AAIAVED “JIHSVEDOdOL WID3dS £961 aunp-c96T aunt fydeaZoues0g Jo uotynyTasuy sddtaszos QVISNT 1OgJ syoesy, pouueTd 44 043 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 20// 200/ 206 208 gS vidvaeisny : BS St rt eee moots = oo € oIn31q LOHS 4VvjJOS NOILVLS DIHdVYSONGAH NOILVLS VWYH3ANV9 3400 ooe@ 98S $931 91 3SINYD VWW3A v9 SNILISNVN ——— —_—— —— — 37% 45 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 044 P ans Lous uvsos » | ® NOILVLS OIHdVY9ONGAH + | ' 6 NOILVLS VY3NVO 2 | 300 0 | oe 882 S937 : 91 3SINYD VWN3A | 5 eae : | | I Was oO£ 46 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 track. Forty-seven piston cores of the bottom sediment were obtained. Multiple photographs of the bottom were taken at 23 stations. Thirty hydrographic stations were occupied and con- sisted of serial observations of temperature, salinity, and oxygen. Sixteen large volume wa- ter samples, representative of all of the water masses, were collected for C-14 age determi- nation. Biological collections included 11 bot- tom trawls and 80 plankton samples. Additional observations included measurements of the heat flow through the ocean floor, and propagation of sound through the SOFAR channel. Under the direction of John E. Nafe, as Chief Scientist, VEMA made passages from Fremantle to Adelaide and from Adelaide to Wellington. During the early part of this pro- gram seismic refraction measurements were undertaken in cooperation with HMAS DIAMAN- TINA. During the remainder of the passage the program of observations underway and at sta- tions was closely similar to that of the Cape Town to Fremantle traverse. VEMA 18 Itinerary Figure 5 3 June 62 Leave Cape Town 20 June 62 Arrive Mauritius 22 June 62 Leave Mauritius 12 July 62 Arrive Fremantle 14 July 62 Leave Fremantle 1 August 62 Arrive Wellington Underway Observations Precision depth recordings Gravimeter recordings Magnetometer total field intensity recordings Bathythermograms Seismic reflection Surface water temperature Station Operations Seismic refraction profiles Gravity cores Hydrographic casts Large-volume samples for C14, H3 Sr, Cs Microbiological sampling Plankton sampling Bottom trawling for biological specimens Sound velocity and transmission measurements Bottom temperatures and temperature gradients Bottom dredging for rocks Bottom photography In Port Observations Rock collections 35-377 O—64_36 545 Manik Talwani, as Chief Scientist, directed the work of VEMA from Cape Town to Mauri- tius. Marcus Langseth was in charge from Mauritius to Wellington. The underway pro- gram included continuous magnetic, topographic, gravity, and seismic reflection measurements. At the Stations cores and Camera Stations were the most common combinations, with more em- phasis than usual being placed on plankton sam- pling. In the area south of Australia a number of bottom trawl stations have been occupied. The passage from Bass to Wellington was be- gun about July 25th. Particular emphasis is placed on comparison of total sediment thick- ness with that found in the Atlantic Ocean. VEMA 19 (1963) VEMA 19 (1963) is being planned to enter the Indian Ocean via either Suez or Cape Town, proceeding to Kerguelen and thence to Freman- tle. The new R/V CONRAD, to be operated by Lamont Geological Observatory, will also spend three months in the Indian Ocean in 1963. During all VEMA cruises, the following program is being carried out under the su- pervision of the investigators named. Dr. Maurice Ewing is the principal investigator on all VEMA cruises. Bruce Heezen J. L. Worzel J. R. Heirtzler R. Gerard J. I. Ewing M. Ewing Charles Drake J. E. Nafe J. 1. Ewing C. Fray R. Gerard W. Broecker P. R. Burkholder Alan Be Alan Bé J. 1. Ewing M. Langseth C. Fray M. Ewing C. L. Drake NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 546 G Indy = hor == Wwe Soi, Te 00) SP i. 06: St SR EE Ee ee eee ee, ee eee: oz ri Boe es ees | ' a \ * (97eUt24TR) 61 VWHA ae | | | | \ soup Poi ee €96T-296T ay. | | £1072 AIESqQQ ; Vata” se: > Eee eee Fo i We) ee [Teotsop~oe5 es f, A, veuns g vy 1 CENEI. m™, Vy, — viavuyv ae quourey fe Sa ‘ Gi. = : aa 4 mek at, RF aca he S & | 60 pue et a Naess syns y oN A & Sastnig =) a a Fy, Janws : WWHA a Ea i. ee one eee eee FEST ES NB WN ProesL pouuera | -001 306 SOG GOL ea a eOO EE SORE Oe =e = 48 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 547 UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND Under Dr. John A. Knauss, the Narragansett Marine Laboratory of the University of Rhode Island is carrying out two three-month studies of the equatorial current circulation in the Indian Ocean ~ aboard the R/V ARGO, whose cruise itinerary has been given above. Planned locations of the sec- tions are shown in Figure 6. WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION The Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, under the direction of Dr. Paul Fye, is planning the following cruises to the Indian Ocean: 1963 June - Nov. ATLANTIS Physical and chemical studies in Red and Arabian Seas and Agulhas Current (Figure 8) 1964 Sept. - March CHAIN Geophysics and submarine geology between Socotra and Cape Agulhas (Figure 7) 1965 Sept. - March CHAIN Geophysics and submarine geology, Cape Agulhas to Laccadives, Chagos to India, India to Suez (Figure 7) 1965 Feb. - July ATLANTIS I Physical and chemical studies in Red and Arabian Seas and Agulhas Current (Figure 8) The programs indicated for the CHAIN and ATLANTIS II respectively are the primary ones. The CHAIN cruises will also include physical and chemical oceanography and the ATLANTIS II cruises geophysics and submarine geology. Key scientists involved in the above program are Earl E. Hays, J. B. Hersey, C. O'D. Iselin and A. R. Miller. In addition, the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution will also have scientific responsibility for the operation of the R/V ANTON BRUUN, which will be devoted primarily to biological work. Under the direction of Dr. John H. Ryther, assisted by Dr. Edward Chin, the following schedule has been established: Arrive Sail 1963 Cruise 1 (Feb. 8) Feb. 18 Bombay Dredging and bottom trawling on conti- Feb. 26 Feb. 28 Puket, Thailand nental shelf additional (Figure 9). Mar. 13 Mar. 16 Rangoon Apr. 15 Apr. 18 Vizagapatam Apr. 29 May 2 Madras May 7 Bombay Cruise 2 = May 17 Bombay Midwater and/or surface collecting May 19 May 22 Ceylon additional (Figure 10). Jun. 27 July 2 Port Louis, Mau. Jul. 22 - Bombay Cruise 3 - Aug. 1 Bombay Midwater and/or surface collecting Aug. 21 Aug. 25 Port Louis additional (Figure 9). Sep. 16 - Tamatave Cruise 4 - Sep. 27 Tamatave Dredging and bottom trawling on conti- Oct. 11 Oct. 15 Aden nental shelf additional (Figure 11). Nov. 5 Nov. 10 Karachi Dec. 1 - Bombay 49 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 548 “pyin 3109 50 549 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 L eanst gy 6961-1961 oa T96TTEI6T “NIV VolNsv Hinos: | NOINN i 201 ™ bata a) VMIANVONVAL s Sy ‘ » v ot “NIVHO A/} NOTAaD (s3sinud 3011 4AN3YYND 40 SONI -ONId 3H1 NO G3SVE NOISIA3Y OL LOarEns) s96r HOUVNN-#96L 1d aS v96t HOYVA- £96) 143s NOIINLILS NI JIHdVYSONV3D0 310H SQO0M 3HL 30 sasinud Av IISAHdO039 93S0d0ud OL +09 205 Ub 51 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 590 8 9Ind14 08 OL 209 06 Or ply soz 0 ie oe ery INZYYND SVHINSV @ V3S NVI€avUuV AHdVY9ONV300 AvOISAHd} ell S961 AVW-AYVOANUS ITSILNVILV cece LAVUINIV WV 9190108031 39N ® ILAv3A09NSI0 HLIM BAILVHY3Ad009 AHdVYSONV3AIO TVOISAHd €96) AON-3nnr TL SILNYV TLV oom 52 dol NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 ~ 29S Ob OF 202 Sc PO 1 OuwwOa ITiud \ TV NoIsEastog| fe Shor Voluswy Hinos: NOINN 01 NnNua NOLNV £9/‘dIS-9NV € ASINYO £9,'Ydv-934 } 3SIndd 53 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 502 OT 91nd | 1VONIE NOTABOE ©) (Pe) Yd NOLNV YW, é f~ SN! tm Gola HiINOSs? *b9d3S-9nV 8 ASINYO €9,‘1Nr-AVW 2 3SINYD Nanda NOLNY ay | 94 503 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 IT ernst OF Pela 202 o2l Olt 209 ee hn a oS TOuwnGs aoniua 4 NOIES 35504 Ob Ob 2 Nanya NOLNV ce “Sh Or 2 Gols Hinos NOINn i 1 NoWnaM | 9 > Arian 202 1 ranvivoow rowers! | auaueonen a * sorvuyD “if soovouve)# j 7 [s ol ne winowy, 01 = aon, F Zp IO Sy 1 2ONAGIADLd = VAY JLNvUIMY . soDvH> n 5 a i ) 77: & 3 ‘ mm G2779HIATE | 4 NOWUE NOLNY * anor" ashe ft Vas NVIEVYV VvuLoz0¢ ' IvoNg@ " Nvrrvany v9‘ Tnr-Nar : . 4 \ | 2 3SINYyd cy! Re bee fe wos ~——«| £9,030 pio) sao : Qe ae sino Nanya Nouny | an rr Ne eT Ae sean 55 504 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Midwater and/or surface collecting additional (Figure 12). Midwater and/or surface collecting additional (Figure 13). Dredging and bottom trawling on con- tinental shelf additional (Figure 11). Dredging and bottom trawling on con- tinental shelf additional (Figure 10). Dredging and bottom trawling on con- tinental shelf and island groups addi- tional (Figure 13). Arrive Sail 1964 Cruise 5 - Jan. 13 Bombay Jan. 24 Jan. 28 Victoria, Seychelles Feb: 755 Feb. 9 Port Louis Mar. 13 Mar. 17 Diego Garcia, Chagos Mar. 23 Mar. 26 Cochin Mar. 28 - Bombay Cruise 6 - Apr. 9 Bombay Apr. 30 May 4 Port Louis Jun. 1 - Durban Cruise 7 - Jun. 12 Durban Jun. 23 Jun. 27 Lourenco Marques aye, 3) Jul. 13 Tulear, Madagascar Jul. 26 - Durban Cruise 8 - Aug. 6 Durban Aug. 19 Aug. 22 Beira Aug. 27 Aug. 30 Mozambique Sep. 9 Sep. 13 Zanzibar Sep. 25 - Tamatave Cruise 9 - Oct 13 Tamatave Octs5 Oct. 12 Port des Galetes (Reunion) Octals Oct. 30 Victoria Nov. 6 Nov. 17 Diego Garcia Nov. 25 - Bombay A full listing of the scientific personnel scheduled to participate in the ANTON BRUUN cruises is given in the Appendix. Under the direction of Professor Andrew F. Bunker, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institu- tion will also operate a four-engined meteor- ological aircraft over the Indian Ocean during 1962, 1963, and 1964. The plane will be in- strumented for the large-scale determination of turbulent transport and the various terms in the heat budget. Four six-week trips are planned. The ATLANTIS II will be equipped with meteorological instruments and will make observations in assistance of the program. 1963 October - December A 1964 February - April B June - September Cc On Cruise C a party of physiologists will be embarked, and emphasis will be placed on obtaining live Latimeria for physiological study. 56 STANFORD UNIVERSITY The Research Vessel TE VEGA will under- take three cruises for biological and geological collection and observation in and around island groups and shallow water areas, landing shore parties on atolls for intensive two- to three- month studies. Extensive investigations of each region by auxiliary vessel. Small boats, dark room, some laboratory space, diving equipment and dredging and experimental trawling to 100 fathoms. The following schedule has been es- tablished (Figure 14): Singapore - Nicobars - Andamans - Colombo Colombo - Laccadives - Maldives - Chagos - Mauritius Mauritius - Seychelles - Comores - Zanzibar U. S. COAST GUARD During May 1961, the U. S. Coast Guard Icebreaker EAST WIND, returning from a trip 500 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 GL eAns1y OL 209 20S Or 00 le fe 1 Gdwmed a5s1ue > iad TV NOIESaSSO¥| —— Oo ¢ 4 4 Sh eOL fyoiuav Hinos; * NOINN 1 woonay ag j f See Terahenn | ier AS po 5 J 2 -01 se & : B\s 1 Soe vA IANVONWA : + im earanoare ‘Pa ae: A 7 iy iR Pu % 0 “ CS RONYE NOUNY anor ’ zo U H909 tm = 01 Vvu10306 = EF irobAta EY eto} TWOWIE a Avawos © vas NvigVvyV £9,YVW-NUP O} G 3SINYO e ye : oe Nanua NOINY en er Ee 1A AWS. . teas, s IN ee > “S ———! See 07 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 ' 006 €1 ensta Me Pie Oh {vorusv .inosr % % NOINN i ae ae fr { i fox: Bee. ra pera ; 3 fa ~~ be eae 1 zanclwoow a) = 6 nana pou | C eS, sie norsao I | that WES vONaa 4 NIHOOQ Septaors ———— Ny 01 a1 BiNVeIY o i nears | ¥y ace mront penanvonet\ eEeN te he b9,‘AON-L90 | 6Ss/189 bO'AVW-ddv 9 3SINYS eh LonvavHse Nnndd NOLNV 58 D070 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 els ”, Uh ' So LF foanvos 02 Od, ofall 001 106 ay +02 Ob 0 02 —— Tauenas abana VolNav Hinos; ¢ NOINN 1 NOINNay VORA aL 0 ; 7, Ol 1 vM10309 by a Re! VIS NVIGVYY pat ® J P96! ‘d3S-NAP 9 :3SINwO ! b96h YdV-II4 @ :dSINUO €961‘930-190 V :SSINYS — at et at 2 AL wnune 4 59 508 to the Antarctic with oceanographic observers from the Hydrographic Office aboard, occupied a line of hydrographic stations from Fremantle west to 78°E, and then north to 4°N. Her track is shown in Figure 15. U. S. NAVY Survey vessels of the U. S. Navy have oc- cupied hydrographic stations in the Persian Gulf and Andaman Sea, as shown in Figure 15. Swinnerton and Sullivan (1962) have reported some of the results. The research vessels CHAIN of Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, ARGO of Scripps In- stitution of Oceanography, and CONRAD of La- mont Geological Observatory are owned by the U. S. Navy, and their operations are supported by the Office of Naval Research. The Office of Naval Research also supports part of the oper- ations of the VEMA and HORIZON. The Navy is also providing one R5D aircraft for use in the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution meteor- ological program and is supplying a NOMAD weather station. Support has been given to the National Oceanographic Data Center for re- — search on data processing for the NOMAD buoy observations. U. S. WEATHER BUREAU Four planes of the Weather Bureau Re- search Flight, normally based in Miami, Flor- ida, in hurricane observation, will operate in India from May to July 1963 and again in Janu- ary and February 1964. The Weather Bureau is also assigning two professional meteorolo- gists to the International Meteorological Center at Bombay. Radiosonde equipment is being loaned by the Weather Bureau for installation on the ANTON BRUUN and ATLANTIS II. BUREAU OF COMMERCIAL FISHERIES The research program of the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries in the Indian Ocean has the following objectives: 1. To study the distribution and abundance of adult tunas in relation to the circula- tion during the two monsoon seasons. 2. To study the relation of the apex preda- tors (tunas, marlins, sharks, etc.) to the food-chain, standing crops and pro- ductivity. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC 60 PROGRAM—1965 a. Organisms eaten (qualitative and quantitative analyses of stomach contents). b. Standing crop of nekton (qualitative and quantitative analyses of mid- water trawl collections). c. Standing crop of zooplankton (quali- tative and quantitative analyses of zooplankton collections). d. Phytoplankton productivity (C‘* up- take). 3. Investigate subpopulations (serology of apex predators: tunas, billfish, and sharks). 4. Distribution and abundance of larval and juvenile fish (plankton and night-light collections). 5. Zoogeography of zooplankton and zoo- plankton forms as biological indicators (distribution and abundance of selected zooplankters such as copepods of the genus Candacia). 6. Taxonomy, occurrence, and distribution of demersal fishes and invertebrates. This program will be carried out by per- sonnel of the Bureau's Biological Laboratory, Honolulu, aboard the ANTON BRUUN. On cruises 2 and 5, a party of 8 fishermen and 3 scientists will be embarked to engage in long- line fishing as follows: a. On each cruise, fish 60 baskets of gear at each station. Occupy 16 sta- tions along each of two meridian; 13 of the stations to be at 5° latitude in- tervals and remaining 3 stations to be occupied in areas of high abundance. b. Data and biological samples to be collected. (1) Catch (by species) and effort. Length and/or weight of each fish. Sex and general state of ‘matura- tion. (4) Preserve stomachs in 10 percent formalin. (5) Preserve ovaries in 10 percent formalin. 509 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 O21 201k _ 2001 206 208 202 09 0S Ob 1 Ouvmaa apniud pone 02 | | { = 0% i Dyson OO, fr. Of volusv Hinos; ‘f NOINNA ems fe 3 oS 202 en! = a yeO! wvereva,\ euanvonval) A a 1 i: 1- Y | =i y a i 20 i) 20! | apes 3 i 1 1 3 33 g a> | ! Na soon | mee) wrarzevz," voanvonva) ; SS i , be eoanoars hey te z oe ~~ RACH aa joo Beret! been ey ae wie be 4 ie ea i Ee =e 1961 /) anf aie rit 7) SS ay vaune a : Ge Ww 4 a N " 3 o i . Ke WSOMMOS| ; H 2 Ys. Sey \ ; rar Cert t e af aN. |S") 270°Sn ? : cas A _lanvs AY H ; YEN Or a ee = = Ses a - Se 21 ih 2001 06 08 202 09 0S UP 64 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Andaman Sea. The actual tracklines in the An- daman Sea will depend in part on the results of the work of the ARGO which returns from this area in the early summer of 1963. In general, however, there will be a series of sawtooth crossings of the Andaman Sea carrying out all of the standard underway observations with special attention paid to the bathymetry and the gravity work. Sediment cores and bottom photo- graphs will be taken in the Andaman Sea along these lines. Rock dredgings will be attempted at places where the topography suggests that rock outcrops might be present. Planned track- lines in this area will be modified in the field as dictated by the bottom topography and gravity anomalies encountered. The pattern will include at least two crossings of the Andaman-Nicobar Ridge into depths of at least 3000 meters ~’est of the ridge. These could conceivably be through Ten Degree Channel and Duncan Pass. At the northern end of the Andaman Sea, special lines shall be run to determine if submarine channel- ling extends seaward of the mouths of the Irra- waddi River. From the Andaman Sea, the ship will pass into the Bay of Bengal where the underway op- erations, cores (or dredgings), and bottom photography will continue along a series of East-West lines at approximately two-degree spacing from the coast of Burma out to approx- imately 88°E. Topographic, gravimetric, or magnetic anomalies found along these lines will be developed more fully. Special care will be taken along the more northerly of these lines to look for any southerly extension of the Ganges Canyon. This has been surveyed in some detail by the Pakistan Navy as far as the edge of the continental shelf. The GALATHEA'S lines showed that it extends south into the Bay of Bengal beyond the shelf, but its extent is not known. It is possible that the valley found by the ALBATROSS east of Ceylon may be the ex- tension of this Ganges Canyon. After a stop at Calcutta, the PIONEER will carry out a detailed survey of the Ganges Submarine Canyon sea- ward of the continental shelf. The canyon will be traced as far seaward as is possible. Cores will be obtained from the canyon floor where possible and attempts will be made to dredge the canyon walls. Bottom photographs will be obtained where camera lowerings appear feasi- ble. If the canyon terminates well north of the latitude of Ceylon, the east-west lines previously 65 563 run in the eastern Bay of Bengal shall be con- tinued westward from 88° to the coast of India. If the canyon continues south to or beyond Cey- lon, it shall be followed to its termination with cross sections run at frequent intervals. On the termination of this project, the ship will proceed to Trincomalee, Ceylon. Leg III - Trincomalee to Djakarta HO Charts 2523 and 3689 show hard ridges through which has been cut a submarine canyon that heads in Trincomalee and Goddiyar Bays on the northeast coast of Ceylon. The canyon has apparently been cut in quartzite and other hard Pre-Cambrian rocks. The canyon extends seaward to depths of at least 800 fathoms where the soundings terminate. As the ship leaves Trincomalee, this canyon will be traced seaward with a set of profiles, and an attempt will be made to dredge the steep walls. Sediment cores and bottom photographs will be obtained where possible. Upon the completion of the canyon survey, three north-south sections of oceanographic stations will be occupied from 5°N to 5°S along 84°E, 88°E, and 92°E. Stations will be at 5°, 4°, and 3°, and at 1/2-degree intervals to the Equator for a total of 17 stations along each profile. The stations at 5°, 3° and 1°N andS will be deep stations to the bottom, the others will be to 2000 meters. Standard bottle spacing will be used, except that depth of stations and bottle spacing may be modified in the light of other results obtained before the PIONEER sails. From the southern end of the easternmost line (5°S, 92°E), the track to Djakarta is tenta- tively planned to accomplish two crossings of the northwestward extension of the trend of the Java Trench. These would be underway obser- vations as described above. The first line would approach the Sumatra coast near Padang and then turn southwest continuing to the latitude of the Sunda Strait, thence due east through the Sunda Strait to Djakarta. The tracklines be- tween the end of the oceanographic stations and Djakarta are only tentative and will be changed to supplement the work of the ARGO currently operating in this area. ; 064 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 SCIENTIFIC PERSONNEL SCHEDULED TO WORK ABOARD R/V ANTON BRUUN CRUISE 1 R. T. Abbott J. E. Bohlke Hans Brattstrom Brinton M. Cohén . J. Hargis S. Hida Isarankura C. LaFond LaFond Norris T. Pruter Sudara PP a ABA 0 FI CRUISE 4 R. J. Barsdate Robert Bieri M. A. Byrd L. S. Cieresko R. C. Dugdale R. Foster F. Fraga T. S! Hida J. K. Kunnenkeri R. Norris A. T. Pruter M. Watson S. Watson L. P. Woods CRUISE 7 O. L. Bandy M. A. Byrd M. R. Carriker E. Cutler B. C. Heezen R. J. Menzies R. Norris V. Orr D. F. Squires W. Wieser + s E -M R. Norris R M CRUISE 2 M. A. Byrd R. C. Dugdale S. McDowell J. A. McGowan R. Norris R. Shomura S. J. Townsley CRUISE 5 . J. Kuenzler . M. Mullin . Shomura . Vannucci CRUISE 8 J. Boss . A. Byrd B. Collette Della Croce Frontier M. Johnson . Menaché Norris M. Peres D. Por Springer M. L. Wass OU BEA eR 66 CRUISE 3 A. W. H. Bé Robert Bieri T. Chen L. Clarke C. Dugdale W. Ebeling W. Fell H. Gibbs J. Hargis M VO sts Pwo n . J. Townsley CRUISE 6 R. H. Backus D. M. Cohen G. D. Grice W. J. Hargis G. W. Mead D. McGill R. Norris P. J. S. Raj CRUISE 9 F. G. Carey W. J. Hargis E. Kirstauer R. Norris E. L. Pierce R. H. Rosenblatt J. M. Teal M. Watson S. Watson NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 565 BIBLIOGRAPHY 1961 KNAUSS, John A., The International Indian Ocean Expedition, Science, 134: 1674-1676. 1962 RAMAGE, C. S., The United States meteorology program for the International Indian Ocean Expedi- tion, Bull. Am. Met. Soc., 43: 57-61. SWINNERTON, J. W., and J. P. SULLIVAN, Shipboard determination of dissolved gases in sea water by gas chromatography, NRL Report 5806, 13 pp., U. S. Naval Research Lab. 67 y th A eee Ki Maine ay wis t. Pater. » MES bo, pe i; “Wigsdk ‘woreh. * ONY a ag bet Witte pik SHURE a Hh Pe Allen, Haris ite Yo | Oo wh Kies hey Ay) Asi HK Btiily HE ft bitvre de # th Shier M Weuaeat Smee d Chute 0 Hi, ‘ ae i ty i Be ae Bynis Culbothe WN, Sate. raat: By h fey * if be antain if pal tenet Vie ia bag, APPENDIX 7 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—FISCAL YEAR 1965, SUBMITTED BY HON. JAMES H. WAKELIN, JR., ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE NAVY, INCLUDING LETTER OF TRANS- MITTAL, DATED MARCH 19, 1964, ADDRESSED TO SPEAKER McCORMACK AND SIGNED BY PRESIDENT JOHNSON J ror : au a T RERI“ZESGIA | POLAATY CA0aTI— MASDONT HHA AgDOHAM 1 r TVATEBIBGA AL WIAMAAW B BMMAT KOR Ya c RMAAT TO AITO vi APIO YVAM WaT 10 ‘POWAMIA OF GRRBGHAA beer Af BORAM O VORVHOL THACI2AAT YX GAKOIR IMA MR in 2 ert DCE YEAME ESSAY SOONER DRS SINC AED aay Matra etme as Ales FISCAL YEAR 1965 INTERAGENCY COMMITTEE ON OCEANOGRAPHY of the FEDERAL COUNCIL FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY ‘United States of America ICO Pamphlet No. 15 March 1964 569 570 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 FEDERAL COUNCIL FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Donatp F. Hornic, Chairman Director, OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY NyLe C, BRADY GLENN T. SEABORG Director, Science and Education Chairman DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION HaroLp BRowN JAMEs E. WEBB Director of Defense Administrator Research and Engineering NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SPACE ADMINISTRATION Joun C. CaLnoun, Jr. N. E. HALABy Science Adviser to the Secretary Administrator DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FEDERAL AVIATION AGENCY (Observer) LELAND J. HAWORTH RAGNAR ROLLEFSON” Director Director, Office of International NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION Scientific Affairs (Observer) J. Hersert HoLtomon DEPARTMENT OF STATE Assistant Secretary for ELMER B. STAATS Science and Technology Deputy Director DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE BUREAU OF THE BUDGET (Observer) BOISFEUILLET JONES Special Assistant to the Secretary for Health and Medical Affairs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE EDWARD WENK, Jr. Technical Assistant to the Director OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (Execulive Secretary) INTERAGENCY COMMITTEE ON OCEANOGRAPHY James H. WAKELIN, Jr., Chairman Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Research and Development) RapM. H. ARNOLD KARO JoHN N. WOLFE U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE I. E. WALLEN Donatp L. McKERNAN Museum of Natural History Bureau of Commercial Fisheries SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR Enwann WENK, JR. (Observer) RapM. R. D. SCHMIDTMAN OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Us icoast euers ROBERT FLEAGLE (Observer) Fae ee ee eee nu! OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY RAGNAR ROLLEFSON . ee: : EnocH L. Ditton (Observer) Office of International Scientific Affairs BUREAU OF THE BUDGET DEPARTMENT OF STATE Harve J. CARLSON ATHELSTAN SPILHAUS (Observer) ; NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION COMMITTEE ON OCEANOGRAPHY Harry G. HANSON Public Health Service DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE RosBerT B. ABEL Office of Naval Research DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY (Executive Secretary) NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM PART 1: SUMMARY FISCAL YEAR 1965 Interagency Committee on Oceanography Federal Council for Science and Technology MARCH 1964 Ou co | = O12 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 TABLE OF CONTENTS Part I Foreword eee I II Ill VI VII Vill Introduction ......... sree enone EL 5 Oceanic Research to Meet National Goals . Improve National Defense . Manage Resources in the World Ocean . Facilitate Intelligent Legislation and Regulation . Safeguard Public Health . Protect Life and Property Ashore Strengthen Basic Science . Conserve Resources Held in Common ae, ep) eal Teal te) fo) tee} a= . Recognition of Foreign Policy Implications FY 1965 Plans and Budgets Interpretation of the FY 1965 Oceanography Budget uu... A. Balance Between Research, Surveys, and Facilities ............ eh Mere iByeATeas) selectedstom special pm phasiseregananttentetene aes Relationship with Other Federal Research and Training Programs Program Management .... A. Planning and Coordination B. Development and Review of Annual Programs C. Gap Filling D. Long Term Investments in Manpower Training E. Data Control Our Present Posture in Oceanography Problems and Emerging Issues ill © © © co co TJ JI TI I ~H WP CO 6 OF CO ND NO HO SO — On Oe) NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM PART 1: SUMMARY FISCAL YEAR 1965 Interagency Committee on Oceanography Federal Council for Science and Technology MARCH 1964 FOREWORD This summary of the National Oceanographic Program for FY 1965 has been prepared particu- larly for the U.S. Congress, as a background for their consideration of the President’s budget trans- mitted to the Congress January 21, 1964. An ac- count is given of the diverse ways in which the oceans contribute to the Nation’s security and welfare, and an outline is presented of specific plans and the associated funding required to ad- vance our understanding of the sea and to exploit this understanding. Also, details are provided of the steps being taken under Federal leadership to strengthen and coordinate this program with due regard for thrift in the use of both manpower and appropriations. The National Oceanographic Program involves participation of scientists, engineers, technicians, and administrative officers from numerous univer- sities, government agencies, and industry. But it is the Federal Government that has had to assume leadership and responsibility for funding a pro- gram which both the Executive and Legislative Branches have specifically endorsed to meet our national needs. From FY 1958 to FY 1964, Federal support has grown from around $35 million to $124 million. Support for the FY 1965 program, now before the Congress, is projected to come to $138 million. These funds are contained in the budgets of eight major departments and independent agencies, a distribution which illustrates the diverse ways in which knowledge of the sea underpins accomplish- ment of a variety of important statutory missions. Yet, these components are fundamentally linked together because all agencies must draw on the same pool of scientific results. We have learned that research conducted for one purpose will often simultaneously serve for other practical ends; in order to provide for coordination and for mutual use of the results of research, there is an increasing use of the “delegated agent’’ concept by which one agency with specialized interests and competence undertakes responsibility to support a critical ele- ment of the program on which all other agencies depend. Accomplishment of the government-wide objectives thus depends significantly on support for all parts of the program. The President, in implementing this articulated program, has sought to coordinate its varied parts through the Office of Science and Technology (OST) and the Federal Council for Science and Technology (FCST). The Council’s Interagency Committee on Oceanography (ICO) is called upon to identify collective goals, to coordinate plans for their achievement, and to make recommendations for government-wide programs. Carefully reviewed by the Council and OST, these recommendations are then employed as guide- lines by the participating agencies and the Execu- tive Office of the President when making choices as to priorities out of the entire spectrum of com- peting needs for all fields of science and for all functions of government. The product of this process for FY 1965 has been integrated in the President’s Budget for FY 1965 and is abstracted in Special Analysis H. Further details as to objectives, plans, and co- ordination, together with an outline of emerging issues that may influence the future development of a vigorous program in oceanography are set forth in this report. 573 574 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 I. INTRODUCTION This Nation’s destiny has been vitally influ- enced by the sea since the days of the early dis- coverers and explorers. In their role as an im- mense defensive moat, the oceans have permitted the growth of our remarkable economy and the ~ development of our free institutions. The oceans have also served as open highways for peaceful commerce. In the modern world, while these influences which mutually fostered development of this Na- tion as a world power remain important, there are additional reasons for seeking a more thorough understanding of the sea. Oceanic resources offer an untapped potential for nutrition, for minerals, for recreation, and for understanding the planet on which we live. Storms tidal waves, and ice pre- sent threats to life, to coastal beaches, to ships, and property; damage from water and waves runs annu- ally to hundreds of millions of dollars. Thought- less contamination and pollution of the sea by man can be disastrous. ; The oceans are the last great frontier of our planet. Apart from seeking to describe the geog- raphy of this 71% of the earth’s surface, scientists have looked to the sea for solutions to broader questions concerning the origin of the universe and the mysteries of life. Despite these compelling reasons to understand the sea, national awareness of its importance, and interest in its exploration, have been uncertain and variable. In 1958, this country was spending less than $35 million annually for studies in the oceans, out of a national basic research budget of well over $1 billion. Concerned that this feeble effort seri- ously thwarted fulfillment of their statutory mis- sions, a number of Federal Agencies requested the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) to identify the national requirements for oceanographic re- search and to propose a ten-year program for their accomplishment. The Academy’s report catalyzed action by both the Executive and the Congress and provided an eloquent source of awakened public understand- ing of man’s relationship to the sea. Almost im- mediately after release of the report, the 86th Congress took the initiative to examine its impli- cations. In March 1959, Representative George P. Miller began a series of extensive hearings under the House Merchant Marine and Fisheries Com- mittee. In April 1959, Representative Overton Brooks introduced H.R. 6298, the first of a series of bills extending through the 88th Congress, which are concerned with strengthening the Nation's oceanic research. In June 1959, Senator Warren G. Magnuson introduced Senate Resolution 136 ex- pressing Congressional intent to stimulate oceanog- raphy as a matter of national policy. This Resolu- tion passed unanimously. In July 1960, the House Science and Astronautics Committee released a com- prehensive report (number 2078) concurring with the goals enunciated by the NAS and indicating that the Committee was “open to persuasion’ that an- nual Federal support should grow to levels of about $160 million by 1970, rather than the $80 million projected by the Academy. Acts of Congress passed in 1960, 1961, and 1962 expanded the research functions of the Coast and Geodetic Survey 1, Coast Guard ?, and Geological Survey 3. H.R. 6997, which would formalize the Executive planning process, is pending. The Executive Branch also acted on the basis of the Academy recommendation. In 1959 the Federal Council for Science and Technology, then a newly formed “science cabinet,” undertook ap- pointment of the Interagency Committee on Ocean- ography to lay plans to correct the serious defi- ciencies in the program. Increased funding was begun in the FY 1960 budget. On 29 March 1961, shortly after his inauguration, President Kennedy, in a special message to the Congress, took note of the comparatively primitive state of oceanography in relation to its potential for the Nation, and urged a step increase in funding for FY 1962 that should bring this field into better balance with other scientific and technical fields. This was a conspicuous policy decision of the President to make sure that this Nation would not again lapse in its quest for knowledge of the sea. Although the short-term practical needs for oce- anic research were recognized, the intent of this program was first to strengthen and expand the tiny nucleus of oceanic scientists interested and capable of doing fruitful research in the oceans, and to provide modern tools for such research— ships, instruments, and shore-based laboratories. Strengthening these resources was a critical pre- requisite to meeting the aggregate and competing future requirements for these limited capabilities. "+ Public Law 86-409, April 5, 1960 (74 Stat. 16). * Public Law 87-396, Oct. 5, 1961 (75 Stat. 61). 5 Public Law 87-626, Sept. 5, 1962 (76 Stat. 427). NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 In 1963, the Federal Council approved the ICO’s Long Range National Oceanographic Plan (1963- 1972) (ICO Pamphlet No. 10) which sets forth in systematic form the objectives of the program, substantive plans, requirements for funds, man- power, ships, and facilities, and roles of partici- II. OCEANIC RESEARCH TO The Long Range Plan states that the national goal is “To comprehend the world ocean, its boundaries, its properties, and its processes, and to exploit this comprehension in the public in- terest, in enhancement of our security, our cul- ture, our international posture, and our economic growth.” It is important to note that this statement and its elaboration express the harmony of views of the National Academy representing the scientific community, the Federal Council representing the President and Executive Departments, and the Congress representing the nation as a whole. Specific objectives or applications of our oceano- graphic research program reflected in this broad statement of goals arise from the following six national needs to: A. Improve National Defense B. Manage Resources in the World Ocean C. Facilitate Intelligent Legislation and Regula- tion . Safeguard Public Health Protect Life and Property Ashore Strengthen Basic Science . Conserve Resources Held in Common . Recognition of Foreign Policy Implications Ome o A. Improve National Defense This Nation is dedicated to preserving world peace. As a matter of policy we maintain military capabilities necessary to meet challenges to the peace. As a matter of policy, we maintain military —the Polaris deterrent, antisubmarine and mine counter-measure forces, carrier attack and amphib- ious forces—all depend for safe, effective operation on accurate knowledge of the ocean environment. Development of nuclear propelled submarines makes submerged operation for very long periods possible, and this creates in the under-sea region an arena for extensive naval operations, one that must become familiar to us. It is essential that we observe and study the sea from the surface to the 575 pating agencies for its development over the com- ing decade. The President approved and _ for- warded this plan to Congress through the Council Chairman. The FY 1965 budget is the first of the annual ICO budgets which has been prepared within the context of the Long Range Plan. MEET NATIONAL GOALS ocean floor, the topography of the bottom, the peculiarities of sound transmission through the sea, the many complex effects of ocean turbulence, currents, fish and plankton concentrations on naval operations, especially on the detection and track- ing of underwater vehicles. This information is essential if we are to use the sea for concealment, and if we are to anticipate the concealment which our competitors may attempt. B. Manage Resources in the World Ocean Fish are a potent source of protein for the diets of many underfed peoples of the world. But we know very little of growth patterns and habits of particular fish, reasons for their migration, or of means to increase stocks and catches. Ocean water and especially the ocean bed may be the source of minerals that the world must ex- ploit when ores and fossil fuels now found on land are depleted. These resources are now unknown in richness and distribution. Extensive, sophisti- cated surveys may be required to inventory this potential. C. Facilitate Intelligent Legislation and Regulation The “law of the sea” has historically been more conscientiously accepted as a code of international behavior than any other. Yet changes in prevailing rights of sovereignty, transit, and conservation in- creasingly depend on technological facts and sci- entific understanding. State as well as Federal legislators and policy makers must increasingly depend on oceanic science. When the interests of recreation, commercial fishing, sport fishing, oil exploration, and waste disposal compete for use of the same coastal resources, wise decisions that ex- tend beyond preservation of the status quo can only be based on the fullest knowledge of the properties of the sea and its coastal areas. Inter- national disputes on defense aspects and fishing rights, which now occur with greater frequency, and matters of ownership of undersea mineral re- 576 sources, sovereignty of straits or restricted waters or of strategically located sea mounts are a poten- tial source of tension, and must be subject to agree- ments based on better data than now available. D. Safeguard Public Health Because of its size, the ocean has often been regarded as an unlimited reservoir for waste dis- posal. Yet, as we have learned about pollution in an apparently unlimited expanse of fresh air, the ocean must similarly be protected against unwit- ting disposal of oily and industrial waste, sewage, and radioactive materials. Data are required con- cerning the potential dilution of waste by ocean currents and concerning the food chain which may involve transfer of substances or bacteriological organisms harmful to man. Such inquiries have become urgent in an increasingly urbanized society wherein effluents may be concentrated in estuarine and in-shore waters that are simultaneously sites for recreation and the habitat of attractive sea food. E. Protect Life and Property Ashore Improve weather prediction. Weather and cli- mate on land are critically influenced by the sea. Droughts, floods, blizzards, and tornadoes a thou- sand miles from the sea coast are generated as part of a complex process, driven by moisture evapo- rated from the oceans. Without collection of es- sential oceanic data related to meteorology and the interaction of wind and water, accurate weather forecasting will always be limited to short time intervals. Protect lives and property. The violence of the sea in storm-propelled or tidal waves and hazards from ice pose threats to life and property. Warn- ings of tsunamis and hurricanes and of icebergs are often of life-and-death importance. Also im- portant is an understanding of the phenomena of beach building and erosion, of countermeasures by man which will contribute to the protection of life and of private property. F. Strengthen Basic Science Past experience has demonstrated that our na- tional welfare is critically related to the quality, scope, and vigor of our scientific base. As the demands of national security, of economic devel- opment, and of related technical fields become stronger, it becomes more and more important NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 that we provide a reservoir of intelligence—of knowledge and of skilled talent—to meet specific requirements and also to serve as a long range investment to meet the unforeseen. Basic research is important for its possible application. But it also provides answers to important questions re- garding the world around us, the origin of the planet itself, the processes by which the continents are formed, the evolution of life itself. Those who pursue such knowledge for its own sake and share it with humanity as a whole satisfy man’s basic curiosity and need to understand the world in which he lives. In the past these men have helped modify man’s ways of thought in complex and far reaching ways. The Federal Government has made it a matter of de facto policy to maintain the strength of the U.S. scientific enterprise, and to broaden its geographic distribution around poten- tial centers of excellence. Expanding the man- power base in oceanography is a specific objective of this program. G. Conserve Resources Held in Common Strengthen the fishing and shipping industries. In the face of severe foreign competition, the Con- gress has provided direct protection and subsidy for the fishing and shipping industries. Such sup- port may become more effective if oceanographic information is fully and aggressively applied. With a better understanding of fish behavior and de- ployment of modern equipment, the fish catch can be enhanced. Also, using data on surface wave spectra, and improving sea state forecasting ships can be more efficiently designed and routed for fast freight delivery and reliable passenger serv- ice. Assist off-shore oil and mineral industries, and recreational development, Although there are numerous indications of rich mineral and oil deposits that one day will claim commercial in- terests, their exploitation does not provide im- mediate incentives to private investment. Because geologic maps of the continental shelves and of the deep ocean are non-existent, the possible economic benefits from the mining of common substances or of trace elements that have been concentrated by the sea are unknown. Such map- ping, and study of prototype techniques for ex- ploitation, which is beyond the present capability of private interests, can be considered a logical extension of mineral surveys and pilot plant op- eration on land. These activities are of increasing NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 importance to our national economy as world- wide demands for resources increase. In regard to our rapidly growing demand for recreational opportunities, oceanic research will aid protec- tion and even extension of beaches, sport fishing development, safety for boating, swimming, surf- ing, and skindiving. H. Recognition of Foreign Policy Implications In addition to six explicit factors motivating oceanic research, there is another concerned with implementing foreign policy. Maintaining a strong military capability is the necessary first step toward world peace. But hunger and malnutrition con- Ill. FY 1965 PLANS The national program in oceanography repre- sents the consolidation of plans of various agencies whose statutory missions encompass achievement of these previously described goals: the Navy pri- marily has responsibility for defense; Interior’s Bureau of Commercial Fisheries, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, Gelogical Survey and Bu- reau of Mines for resources development; the Coast and Geodetic Survey, the Coast Guard, and Army’s Corps of Engineers are concerned with protection oT tinue to debilitate many newly emerging nations and threaten their desire for self-determination. We are committed to helping other nations find their rightful destiny and to employ science and technology where it may lessen world tensions and meet economic and social needs. We thus seek - information about the sea that may help those nations which suffer from indigenous protein de- ficiency to use contiguous living resources of the ~ sea more effectively. In addition, because the oce- anic phenomena affect all nations and are too extensive for any one to explore alone, coopera- tive international expeditions offer fruitful avenues for discourse, planning, and use of scientific re- sults to mutual advantage. AND BUDGETS mission for verifying safety of low-level radioactive waste disposal; and the Public Health Service for protecting the health of our citizens. The trend in the aggregate obligations by these agencies for oceanography is shown in Table 1: Table 1. Federal Obligations for Oceanographic Research, Surveys and Facilities of life and property; Maritime Administration with FY 1960 $ 55 million improved sea transport; the National Science Foun- FY 1961 62 dation, Office of Education, and Smithsonian, for FY 1962 104 developing our national research and manpower FY 1963 124 resources, and to maintain the strength of the FY 1964 (estimated) 124 U.S. scientific enterprise; the Atomic Energy Com- FY 1965 (proposed) 138 Table 2 FY 1965 Obligations for the National Oceanographic Program, by Agency Defense Commerce Interior National Science Foundation Atomic Energy Commission Health, Education and Welfare Treasury Smithsonian Institution 35-377 O—64-— 38 Actual Estimated Proposed FY 1963 FY 1964 FY 1965 $ 55,475 $ 54,631 $ 66,619 23,645 23,752 20,486 16,104 16,509 19,652 19,700 20,200 20,600 3,516 4,167 4,730 4,108 2,855 3,280 511 1,152 1,822 607 605 881 $123,666 $123,871 $138,070 578 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Table 3 FY 1965 Obligations for the National Oceanographic Program, by Function (1) Research Instrumentation Ships Surveys International Indian Ocean Expedition (IIOE) Facilities Data Center (11) Ship construction Surveys and data collection in support of research and agency missions Research, Instrumentation, IIOE and Facilities (Navy) Research, Instrumentation, IIOE and Facilities (Civil) These budgets represent the collective plans of Federal Agencies, coordinated in planning and execution by the Federal Council’s ICO to meet the collective goals outlined in the preceding sec- tion and simultaneously to strengthen the base of research and training resources required for the future. A summary of budgets is given in Volume 2, with a breakdown by agency, year, and functional area. The FY 1965 budget for oceanography achieves the goal, enunciated by President Johnson in his budget message of January 21, 1964 to meet na- tional needs while keeping costs under tight con- trol. The oceanographic component has also been developed from careful planning in relation to other needs and requirements which compete for Federal support. Finally, the research budget was developed taking into consideration the rate at which this field can grow so as not to outdistance Actual Estimated Proposed FY 1963 FY 1964 FY 1965 $ 46,410 $ 58,722 $ 69,143 6,658 6,386 9,110 37,250 27,387 21,350 18,036 21,916 25,014 5,802 5,582 3,979 8,875 2,937 8,420 635 941 1,054 $123,666 $123,871 $138,070 Actual Estimated Proposed FY 1963 FY 1964 FY 1965 $ 37,250 $ 27,387 $ 21,350 18,671 22,857 26,134 26,700 31,917 41,177 41,045 41,710 49,409 $123,666 $123,871 $138,070 the specialized science skills upon which it de- pends. It should be recognized that this national pro- gram in oceanography is a multi-disciplinary enter- prise that embraces both basic and applied research in classical disciplines of biology, physics, chem- istry, as well as engineering applications related to the sea. Moreover, expansion of knowledge about the sea entails a dual activity of (a) stating and solving problems using methods of mathe- matics and the basic sciences, and (b) observing the gross features of the ocean. Historically the first endeavor was characterized as “oceanology,” the charting and mapping being designated as “oceanography.” These two mutually supporting activities are in this budget termed “research” and “surveys.” Research has been classified by five problem areas, shown in Table 4: NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 579 Table 4. FY 1965 Obligations for Oceanographic Research, by problem area Objective . Physical properties and motion of the sea . Ocean-atmosphere interrelationship . Biological properties . Structure and history of the ocean floor . Modification of the sea Totals * GB oo PO Approximate Proposed FY 63 BY SOs: FY 65 11,812 15,000 20,524** 4,000 5,500 5,890 15,000 18,500 18,611 12,500 15,000 19;235 =e 8,900 10,000 8,862 52,212 64,000 735122 “These figures include support for research performed within the International Indian Ocean Expedition Program. They equate to the sum of the Research and IIOE functional areas in the budget tables. By prior arrangement, the meteorology program carried out within IIOE is reported by the Interdepartmental Committee on Atmospheric Sciences; this tends to depress the apparent support given to objective II. ®*Some areas of research have received increased emphasis because of new development or urgent needs in these areas. Marine biology has been a field set aside for special emphasis. These categories of research problems, while mutually exclusive, are necessarily arbitrary. Ship operating costs, small laboratory equipment, and expendable supplies are included with research. The International Indian Ocean Expedition has been separately listed in Table 3 because of the very extensive nature of U.S. commitments but, by class of activity, it is considered research. Again, further details are set forth in Volume II. It should be understood that a substantial frac- tion of the research is conducted in private and university laboratories and that grants and con- tracts are awarded by the National Science Foun- dation, Office of Naval Research, and other agen- cies on the basis of merit and available funds. Surveys can be characterized best by the follow- ing table showing the number of ships by geo- graphical areas in which survey operations are scheduled during FY 1965. Table 5. FY 1965 Operating Areas of Survey Ships Atlantic Western Atlantic 4 large 1 small Southeast Coast of USA 1 large 4 small North Atlantic 1 large — Gulf of Mexico 1 large — Western Tropical Atlantic Zancai Pacific Western Pacific (mostly Japan-Philippines area) 4 large 1 small Eastern Pacific 1 large — North Pacific 4 large — Indian Ocean 1 large — Unassigned (on shakedown) 3 large — These surveys include measurement of water depth, water temperature, salinity, magnetic field, gravity, samples of bottom sediment, and biota. Capital plant expansion in the form of new ships, new instrumentation, and new shore facili- ties, are also detailed in Volume II. Funding for the National Oceanographic Data Center, a Navy-administered but jointly funded data bank, is also separately described. 580 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 IV. INTERPRETATION OF THE FY 1965 OCEANOGRAPHY BUDGET A. Balance between Research, Surveys, and Facilities The $138 million proposed for FY 1965 repre- sents 11% growth over Congressional appropria- tions for FY 1964. Considerably below Presidential requests, FY 1964 appropriations just equalled FY 1963 levels. To maintain the effective cutting edge of research and training, the new budget has been carefully tailored to foster growth in the conduct of research. Levels are proposed of $73 million, up from $64 million in FY 1964 and $52 million in FY 1963. Sustaining this momentum has been accomplished by slowing down ship construction. In the long run, the program may benefit by this decision because of the opportunity deliberately taken to evaluate performance of new ships already in operation or funded, before proceeding with construction of duplicates. Opportunity will also thus be afforded to explore the emerging potential of such unconventional data gathering tools as unmanned buoys, submarines, and FLIP-type plat- forms. Growth in research funding is not a direct yardstick of growth in program scope, however, because unit costs of doing research continue to increase annually, and because ship operating ex- penditures are now reflecting important additions to the oceanographic fleet. Another consideration in preparing the FY 1965 budget was an assessment and confirmation of the balance between funds, number of ships, and num- ber of available qualified oceanographers. B. Areas Selected for Special Emphasis Relative emphasis as between goals is best under- stood by reference to the budget breakdown by agency. As revealed in Table 2, roughly half of the budget is supported by the Defense Dept. and associated with national security. This is consist- ent with the 46% of the total Federal R & D budget funded by the Department of Defense. New growth in the National Oceanographic pro- gram is primarily in the Navy’s component, re- flecting heightened interest in environmental fac- tors which influence naval performance. Considered by problem area, a sharp growth in physical oceanography and geophysics, problem areas I and IV has resulted. Two special substantive areas have been identi- fied and earmarked for special emphasis. These are the air-sea interaction, problem area II, and research in the deep oceans (parts of all five prob- lem areas). In both cases, an expansion in research effort is being encouraged because of the increas- ing opportunities to solve old problems with new tools for research—buoys, deep diving submarines, telemetering, etc. Inasmuch as program planning must precede funding, the attention being directed to these areas will not be reflected in later budgets. However, special studies are being made that will be published as separate reports by the ICO later this year. Geographical areas receiving special attention in Fiscal Year 1965 include: a. Indian Ocean: The International Indian Ocean Expedition, involving significant support from twelve nations, will continue. As field opera- tions phase out in FY 1965, attention will center on data analysis and dissemination. b. Tropical Atlantic: Field operations in the International Cooperative Investigation of the Tropical Atlantic, involving ten nations, will ter- minate. Effort will be mainly devoted to data analysis and publication of atlases. c. U.S./Japan Investigations of the Pacific: Pur- suant to a bilateral agreement between the two nations, a number of individual cooperative proj- ects in Pacific oceanography will be prosecuted. V. RELATIONSHIP WITH OTHER FEDERAL RESEARCH AND TRAINING PROGRAMS To facilitate understanding of the oceanographic program, it is important to recall that other pro- grams sponsored by the Federal Government con- tribute to knowledge of the ocean, although they are not catalogued under this definition. For ex- ample, basic research in classical disciplines such as biology, geophysics, mechanics, and even mathe- -] matics and now in engineering contribute impor- tant fragments of answers to questions about the sea. Expenditures for basic research as a whole, in- cluding oceanography, are expected to grow as follows. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Table 6 Expenditures for conduct of Basic Research (in millions of dollars) + FY 1963 FY 1964 FY 1965 All agencies 1,350 1,657 1,809 NASA (including booster costs) 525 727 790 All Agencies except NASA 825 930 1,019 1 Source; The Budget FY 1965, Special analysis H; Page 409. On the more applied side of the program, the Navy is funding programs in ASW and in ship hydrodyn- mics. In response to the THRESHER disaster and a subsequent special study of deep submergence vehicles, the Navy is expected to ex- pand its capabilities for search, rescue, and sal- vage.* These separate new programs should con- tribute engineering knowledge concerning ships, structures, vehicles, and equipment to operate in and under the sea, results that should provide better tools for basic research, and also lay ground- 581 work for engineering application of oceanographic research. Basic research and civilian engineering stands to gain greatly from a program of Navy development, and special steps are being taken to assure a rapid flow of new engineering information. Accelerated physiological studies on manned free diving under Navy sponsorship, should lay a durable base for a more concerted attack on the sea. Coordination is also being effected with other government-wide programs, developed under the Federal Council, such as for air-sea interface re- search of mutual interest to the Interdepartment Committee for Atmospheric Sciences and the In- teragency Committee on Oceanography. Finally, in the areas of manpower, education, and training, numerous programs funded by NSF, National Institutes of Health, and the Office of Education provide fellowships, matching funds for research facilities, etc., that may concurrently serve needs in oceanography, although not so de- lineated. Such support was recently expanded for graduate education in engineering, through a new training grant program in NSF. VI. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT A. Planning and Coordination The national goals expressed in the Long Range Plan and restated in Section II are reflected in existing statutory requirements of some 20 Federal Agencies. Yet, the program as a whole is not the specified responsibility of any single one. When stimulation of this field was deemed necessary, it Was necessary to choose between strengthening ex- isting programs, or excising jurisdiction for ocean- ography from the many agencies now involved and recombining these interests in a new Federal Oceanographic Agency. Because of the relevance of research in the oceans to broader missions: to defense, to the protection of public health, to im- prove weather forecasting, etc., the first alternative was chosen. Coordination thus became essential to the healthy growth of this program, to minimize both unwitting duplication and to minimize gaps. The role of the Federal Council for Science and Technology, and of its Interagency Committee on Oceanography in coordination and in program and budget planning has already been described. In addition to these continuing responsibilities, * Report of Deep Submergence Systems Review Group, March, 1964 the ICO has taken the initiative in the following matters. Oceanographic data collected by separate agencies are now centrally standardized, depos- ited, and made available for distribution. Ships schedules of all agencies and laboratories are published in advance to permit the efficient shar- ing and utilization of facilities by others. Gov- ernment-wide manpower requirements are co- ordinated. To foster interest on the part of young students, a report cataloguing oceanography cur- ricula of all U.S. universities has been published. A special study has been undertaken to determine the demand, the sources of supply and the mobil- ity of oceanographic manpower, as a guide to the investment of future training funds and as a model for understanding manpower dynamics generally. Under ICO direction, with Coast and Geodetic Survey acting as a delegated agent, an operations analysis is being conducted to optimize planning for effective, economical surveys using modern techniques of data gathering, and to meet a variety of needs for data. Finally, in concert with the State Department, the ICO develops plans and U.S. position for international coopera- 582 tive efforts, especially for the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC). Such inter- change is in our national interest because it fosters the collection of data beyond the capacity of a single nation. Cooperative research also provides an additional avenue for world understanding. B. Development and Review of Annual Programs This is the fourth annual development of a government-wide program in oceanography trans- mitted to the Congress. By no means a rigid blue- print, the plans developed by ICO are intended as guidelines to individual agencies and the Executive Office of the President when making final budget determinations. The planning process comprises three steps: 1. Preparation of programs and budgets on a functional basis by ICO Panels, their screening, refinement, and consolidation by the parent com- mittee; 2. Evaluation of that program by an independ- ent panel of consultants, convened by the Director, Office of Science and Technology, and by the OST staff; and 3. Consideration of these proposals, recommen- dations, and criticisms by the Council, with en- dorsement that represents a single coherent plan- ning guide for all participating agencies to use in budget preparation. The quality of research is sustained in each agency by the normal processes of proposal evalu- ation, contract, or grant administration, and by jus- tification processes at various levels in the agency. In addition, as noted in the planning sequence, the collective plans and programs of agencies are sub- ject to further review by consultants from industry and universities convened by the Office of Science and Technology. These consultants evaluate the proposals by the ICO for scope and balance, and test them against the needs and opportunities as set forth by the National Academy of Sciences Committee on Oceanography (NASCO), supple- mented by more recent contributions from the scientific and engineering community. C. Gap Filling Insuring that important research problems or possibilities for development are not overlooked is the most important administrative function re- lating to the oceanographic program. Gaps in the program may occur through (a) the emergence of new fields lying between the missions of existing NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 agencies, and (b) through delay in recognition of new possibilities. Each of these possibilities is monitored continu- ally by the ICO through its research panel, by OST through its staff and consultants, and by the Na- tional Academy of Sciencies through its Committee on Oceanography. Examples of problems and po- tentialities which have been identified in this way include marine biology, air-sea interaction, deep submergence vehicles, and ocean engineering. D. Long Term Investments in Manpower Training Federal stimulation of oceanographic research carries with it the responsibility to support the longer term training of the manpower needed to carry Out the program in the future. A large num- ber of well trained scientists and engineers will be required to carry out future programs, and the changing demands of a science which is rapidly becoming more and more sophisticated must be reflected in steadily improving quality of our uni- versity teaching programs. The Federal Govern- ment through its fellowship and training programs and through research grants and contracts, is sup- porting rapidly growing educational programs in Oceanic sciences at uMiversities scattered through- out our country. In many cases a trained scientist and a curious, energetic student may explore na- ture together on a campus remote from the sea, obtaining their original data or testing their hy- potheses through cooperative arrangements with other institutions. E. Data Control To meet the need for a centralized repository, the National Oceanographic Data Center (NODC) has been established in Washington, D. C. Policy guidance is provided by an advisory board repre- senting six supporting agencies and the National Academy of Sciences. The Naval Oceanographic Office furnishes administrative support. In addition to its original functions of organizing data collection, archiving, and editing of inherited data, the NODC now devotes much of its effort to serving the research users of data. For example, 56% of the total dollar receipts for FY63 data services were for data evaluation and analysis. By its charter, NODC is “responsible for acquir- ing by exchange, gift, or purchase, oceanographic data of scientific value from domestic or foreign sources.” To this end, exchange relationships have ' been established with the new Canadian Oceano- graphic Data Center and similar arrangements are NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 in process with upcoming centers in Australia, New Zealand, Japan, and the United Kingdom. The transfer of World Data Center A, Oceanography (WDCA), a repository for IGY results, to space in the data center has simplified these exchanges. In- ternational agreements have been made to facilitate exchanges between WDCA and its counterpart WDC-B, in Moscow. NODC also cooperates with the International Council] for Exploration of the Sea (embracing 16 European nations) and 30 other 583 foreign oceanographic organizations. NODC is proc- essing the data from the International Indian Ocean Expedition and the International Coopera- tive Investigations of the Tropical Atlantic. NODC is promoting and using modern tech- niques of data handling and retrieval. Under pres- ent development are systems for sorting and re- trieving biological and geological-geophysical data, better data interpolation techniques, and field quality control methods. VII. OUR PRESENT POSTURE IN OCEANOGRAPHY A great deal of progress has been made, and the FY 1965 budget proposals within overall budget guidelines are minimum to sustain the program. If the President's FY 1965 proposals are accepted, then during the past five years the Federal Government will have invested $134 million in new ships ex- pressly for oceanography. For the first time in this Nation’s history, we have the beginnings of a fleet of efficient floating laboratories and are starting to replace the present inadequate facilities. With the addition of ships newly completed or funded, ton- nage of ships for oceanographic and fisheries re- search will have increased more than 50%. Also, during the past five years, the Federal Government will have invested $39 million in new shore facili- ties. Most important, the annual support for con- duct of research and associated instrumentation will have grown from approximately $27 million in FY 1960 to $83 million in FY 1965. The number of scientists and engineers will have increased from 1600 estimated in 1960 to 3000 esti- mated in 1964 and industry has responded by developing its staff, facilities, and planning capa- bilities focused on research and development. This current year is one of overall modest budget growth. It should also be one of careful analysis —by members of the scientific community engaged in research; by the Executive Branch charged with utilizing fruits of that research for accomplishment of assigned missions; by industry which contributes new engineering tools for the conduct of research and which serves as entrepreneur to transfer sci- entific discoveries to practical benefit; and by the public and its legislative representatives who give expression to the collective concerns through deci- sions on policy and appropriations. Such analysis should be aimed at identifying those scientific areas that have ripened to a point where a more concerted attack would be produc- tive, and those practical policy, security, economic or social needs which can be met only by selective emphasis on special areas. VIII. PROBLEMS AND EMERGING ISSUES Questions which the Executive Branch will be examining this year include: 1) Manpower—Is our supply of high talent growing rapidly enough to meet the needs and op- portunities in this field? If not, what collective steps by universities and Government are necessary to accelerate education and training? 2) Private Investments—Are results of research being enunciated effectively to the private sector of our economy, so that as users of research results they may assess opportunities for investment in underwater engineering applied to fishing, mining, recreational developments? Are these opportunities of such value to the Nation to meet economic and social needs that additional incentives are needed? 10 3) Participation by industry—How may the en- gineering competence of American industry be more effectively blended with American science, for a concerted exploration on the sea frontier? 4) Policy-making—How may fruits of research be wisely introduced into Federal, State and Inter- national legislative and regulatory processes, so that policy and administrative rules may be responsive to new facts about the sea; and how may policy makers become partners in formulating questions about the sea requiring research? In short how may the U.S. program be further advanced, developed and coordinated to satisfy the long range goals: to comprehend the sea, to explore it, and to exploit these resources? Lien ALG Ai aetieyh pala: Apebige tae ; peter nian ghide Soren teh Ashe Stats RReOU He eeuniesee ty bacibvesh Tm painprict ats: tigated Pie st (dren tbs eGR v aie as ax bute DUTT tek wiupatsc: peimer ewe shed sbiegeaastinl sot PBPIOS bs shogun SR eIeve - a adie: Hap BER ett nial) Saiabas Harllee 3 or" ¥ etinaesecieealy | bt OT MOT are HP ALOR AOA LGN san tpi ite Earnie 1 3lly EDs eviaead boxintl br oa RAS: & onys? he Meperpa cht wer taious usted! awoatl 4 Availdn re SAIS Tarik ale Fame? errs nett cophetort ied: mete ty Ni nS: abil ued wig. tt oped i : i : ae iy aig! sapegin ye aii 9B: herded ees ‘ t% ase, “Eyed NRA eae MBrais? cdaeric JacdsRntersne ae aad Stages - “at cbetimthow (anni, NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 1965 PART II: THE PROGRAM AND ITS COST MARCH, 1964 586 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 TABLE OF CONTENTS Part II Introduction Chapter I-OCEANOGRAPHIC EFFORT A. Fields of Research ne . Deep Sea Research Vehicle Program Physical Properties and Motion of the Sea 2. Ocean-Atmosphere Inter-Relationships 3. Biological Properties 4. 5 6 Structure and History of the Ocean Floor . Modification of the Sea B. Oceanographic Services I Za Ocean Surveys National Oceanographic Data Center C. International Oceanographic Programs 1. 2. . US-Japan Investigations of the Pacific International Indian Ocean Expedition (IIOE) ... International Cooperative Investigations of the Tropical Atlantic (ICITA) 3 4. US-Latin American Programs De 6. Program for World Oceanographic Study Cooperative Study of the Kuroshio . Chapter II-OCEANOGRAPHIC RESOURCES A. Ships B. Instrumentation C. Facilities D. Manpower and Training Chapter ITII-NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PLAN BUDGET A. By Agencies B. By Functional Areas . C. Individual Agency Budgets ...... Appendix—ICO Oceanographic Survey/Research Ships ..0........00000. 13 15 17 17 17 19 21 24 26 27 28 29 31 31 31 32 32 32 32 33 35 35 35 37 37 39 39 39 40 43 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 587 INTRODUCTION Federal support for the National Oceanographic Program for Fiscal Year 1965 has been developed within the framework of the recently completed Long Range National Oceanographic Plan (1963- 1972).* This plan sets forth the national goals and describes the contributions of the various fed- eral agencies to these goals. The program is carried out in part by scientists and technicians in govern- * Federal Council for Science and Technology, Oceanog- raphy, The Ten Years Ahead, A Long Range National Oceanographic Plan, 1963-1972 Interagency Committee on Oceanography Pamphlet No. 10, June 1963, 58 pp. ment laboratories, bureaus, and offices; and a most essential part is carried out by universities and research institutions with government support. In the following pages a concise account is given of the federal effort proposed in FY 1965 to maintain the momentum in oceanography developed in the last few years and to modify the direction and pace of the program in the light of new knowledge or of new perspective. The total budget proposed here is $138 million, $14 million more than was appropriated by the Congress in FY 1964. The relative emphasis of the five fields of research are portrayed in Table I on page 2. Table I* National Oceanographic Program Research Budget, by Problem Area (thousands $) FISCAL YEAR. PROBLEM AREA Esti- President's mated Approximate Budget 1963 1964 1965 1. Physical Properties and Motion of the Sea $11,812 $15,000 $20,524 2. Ocean-Atmosphere Inter-Relationships 4,000 5,500 5,890 3. Biological Properties 15,000 18,500 18,611 4. Structure and History of the Ocean Floor 12,500 15,000 19,235 5. Modification of the Sea 8,900 10,000 8,862 Total Research Budget $52,212 $64,000 $73,122 * These figures include support for research performed within the International Indian Ocean Expedition Program. They equate to the sum of the Research and MOE functional areas in the budget tables. By prior arrangement, the meteorology program carried out within IIOE is reported by the Interdepartmental Committee on Atmospheric Sciences; this tends to de- press the apparent support given to objective II. 088 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Chapter I OCEANOGRAPHIC EFFORT A. Fields of Research 1. PHYSICAL PROPERTIES AND MOTION OF THE SEA: $20,524,000 Description and understanding of the distribu- tion of temperature and salinity, of the velocity of ocean currents, and of the concentrations of various chemical elements and compounds is central to the total oceanographic program. Description is based on observations of many kinds taken at sea, and understanding develops through the application of the methods and principles of mathematics, physics, and chemistry to ocean data. Thus, a wide range of research contributes to an understanding of the physical properties of the sea, and the results are applied to the investigation of such diverse problems as biological productivity of the sea, ship design, and weather forecasting. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE UNITED STATES NAVY Office of Naval Research: $8,682,000 ONR supports research through contracts with umniversities, research institutes, other government agencies, and industry. An extensive program will be directed at obtaining time series measurements of physical quantities in the deep ocean. Long range telemetering buoys are being developed by the Convair Corporation. Together with the neces- sary shore command stations, and sensors, experi- mental buoys will be used by Texas A&M, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, Lockheed Aircraft Corporation, University of Wisconsin, the Navy Electronics Laboratory, and other institutions. In addition to current studies other experiments will be undertaken to determine the energy spectra of internal waves both in the open ocean and in con- fined bodies of water. Oceanographic institutions will intensify at- tempts to measure and understand oceanic currents and circulation. Direct measurements will be taken of the Yucatan and Florida currents in the Gulf of Mexico, the Gulf Stream and the equatorial currents in the Atlantic, the California and the equatorial currents in the Pacific, and the equato- rial currents in the Indian Ocean. General circu- lation patterns will be studied by using tempera- ture-salinity relationships, chemical isotope mea- 17 surements, biological population distributions, and electronic computer analysis of improved theories. Investigation of the Tropical Atlantic will con- tinue through investigation in both the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, New York Uni- versity, and Texas A&M as part of the Inter- national Investigations of the Tropical Atlantic (ICITA) , and investigation of the Indian Ocean will continue through the Scripps Institution of Oceanography, Lamont Geological Observatory, University of Rhode Island, and Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution as part of the Interna- tional Indian Ocean Expedition (IIOE). * * * Naval Oceanographic Office: $1,547,000 NAVOCEANO supports research through con- tract and also conducts in-house research, particu- larly that directed toward military planning and antisubmarine and mine warfare. Investigations of oceanographic conditions in the Arctic Ocean north of Siberia and in the Green- land Sea will be continued and extended to other areas, in collaboration with Canadian oceanog- raphers and those from the University of Washing- ton. Newly developed buoy capability will be fur- ther exploited to study time variations of deep ocean currents, their temperature, and other en- vironmental conditions. Measurements of back- ground isotopic radiation, initiated in FY 1964, will continue. Full-scale studies of the use of iso- topes in determining the three-dimensional circu-- lation patterns of the oceans will be carried out. Research and development directed toward im- provement of oceanographic instruments and mea- surement techniques will be continued. * * * Bureau of Ships: $1,956,000 Using improved sensors mounted on oceanogra- phic towers, surface ships, and the bathyscaph TRIESTE, studies of the distribution of sound velocity will be continued. In collaboration with the Office of Naval Research, BuShips will sup- port the Navy Electronics Laboratory investigations. of wave generation and wave spectra. Increased emphasis will be placed on an analytical ap- proach to accumulated data by combining statistics, oceanography, computer technology, and acoustics. The degree of stability of oceanographic variables. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 for large ocean areas will be assessed. Field pro- grams on surveillance of sea ice will continue. * * * Bureau of Naval Weapons: $2,330,000 In FY 1965 new oceanographic research ships will be used by Bureau laboratories to conduct experiments important to weapon system design, development, and predication of systems perform- ance. The University of Washington Applied Physics Laboratory, using a deep-sea unmanned vehicle will continue to study the horizontal varia- bility of physical properties. The Naval Ordnance Test Station, China Lake, California will use a recently developed sound velocity-temperature- pressure measuring set to study the microstructure of physical and chemical properties. * * * Bureau of Yards and Docks: $100,000 In order to allow more accurate and effective design of piles for shallow water structures the re- duction and analysis of data collected on a three foot diameter pile, located in 100 feet of water in the Gulf of Mexico, will be continued. A time and spectral analysis of the data will be conducted to determine mass and drag coefficients. * * * UNITED STATES ARMY Corps of Engineers Coastal Engineering Research Center: $290,000 The Corps of Engineers plans to intensify its study, both in the laboratory and in the field, of tidal flow at inlets and in estuaries in order better to understand the processes of silting, shoaling, and beach erosion. The Corps hopes to simplify evaluations of estuary and lagoon flushing charac- teristics. * * * DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Coast and Geodetic Survey: $512,000 The ships of the C&GS will operate in coastal waters and in the deep ocean. Data collected on cruises will be used for charts and atlases of ocean properties. C&GS will also support the research efforts of other Federal Agencies and scientific in- stitutions. For FY 1965, plans include participation in the international study of Antarctic tidal phenomena, as well as research in deep-ocean tides, propagation of tide waves along U.S. coasts, long-period tides, and tsunamis. 18 589 Coastal currents will be studied, and work will continue on the development of a system for auto- matic measuring of currents and their variations with time. Ocean survey data will continue to be utilized in research on general dynamics of the deep sea, with special emphasis on the study of oceanic fronts. * * * Maritime Administration: $50,000 In order to promote safety and efficiency of ship Operation a research program is supported through contract with the Massachusetts Institute of Tech- nology. Experimental and theoretical studies of Ocean wave spectra and their effect on ship motion will be continued. * * * DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Commercial Fisheries: $2,740,000 Because of the intimate but obscure relations be- tween the physical state of the sea and the pro- ductivity of the sea, BCF is committed to an ex- panding program of research on physical and chem- ical oceanography. In FY 1965, field work will start on a synoptic study of the Eastern Tropical Pacific Ocean in which knowledge of the response of the ocean to the atmosphere will be an important objective. Also, this year, the Bureau will initiate a coopera- tive investigation of the oceanography of the trade wind zone in the Central Pacific. Work will continue on a fishery-oceanography program in the Tropical Atlantic as part of ICITA. Environmental investigations in the western North Atlantic will be intensified. The Bureau will increase its support of oceano- graphic buoy development; it will cooperate with other agencies in the use of buoys for collecting physical and chemical data and monitoring en- vironmental changes. In its continuous study to relate changes in the ocean climate to variations in fish occurrence and abundance, the Bureau proposes to support in every possible way the collection of more lengthy time series of oceanographic data. * * * Geological Survey: $142,000 The USGS will intensify its efforts to determine the effects of fresh water and sediment discharge from land areas on the composition and physical properties of marine water within bays and estu- 590 aries and on the Continental Shelves of the United States. The objective of these studies is to deter- mine the quantities and composition of water and sediments carried to the ocean by rivers, and to determine the distribution and precipitation of sediments and associated wastes in marine waters. Studies of the dynamics of mixing fresh water and salt water and the loss of fresh water from aquifers that extend beneath the continental shelf will con- tinue. Also to be studied will be chemical reac- tions taking place within sediments and rocks on the sea floor. * * * National Science Foundation: $2,175,000 NSF grant and contract support will include, in addition to its usual support of research at uni- versities and institutes, major efforts in the Inter- national Indian Ocean Expedition and a continu- ing program of Antarctic oceanography conducted aboard the USNS ELTANIN. Theoretical investigations and model studies on general circulation and exchange rates are being conducted at Massachusetts Institute of Tech- nology, New York University, Lamont Geological Observatory, Johns Hopkins University, and the University of Washington. Such work will advance our understanding of oceanic current development and of estuarine and coastal circulation. Major field studies aimed at elucidating the character of both deep and shallow water circula- tion are being undertaken by Scripps Institution of Oceanography, Woods Hole Oceanographic In- stitution, Oregon State University, the University of Miami, University of Southern California, Uni- versity of Connecticut, Yale University, University of Washington, Texas A&M College, and the Uni- versity of Rhode Island. These will be in close co- operation to similar work supported by ONR. The chemistry of sea water is being investigated by various means. Amherst College, Scripps, Wash- ington, Woods Hole, and Miami are active in this work. * * * 2. OCEAN-ATMOSPHERE INTER- RELATIONSHIPS: $5,890,000 The ocean and the atmosphere constitute an interacting mechanical and thermodynamic sys- tem. Thorough understanding of such problems as weather prediction, acoustic communication channels through the sea, the behavior of the Gulf Stream, or the upwelling of cold water, which may 19 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 sustain a rich growth of biological material all depend in complex ways upon the interaction of air and water. The most critical research needs in this area may be grouped in the following way: (a) laboratory and field studies of the physical chemistry of the interface and its role in transfer through the surface, (b) development and testing of instruments and platforms to measure wind stress and vertical transfer of heat, water vapor, carbon dioxide, and other materials, (c) coordi- nated field programs comparing several independ- ent methods for measuring vertical transfer, (d) development of observation, data collecting and processing systems covering large ocean areas, and (e) incorporation of effects of interaction in large scale dynamic problems (e.g., 30 day weather pre- diction). Planning in this area has been carried out initially by the National Academy of Sciences and by the Joint ICO-ICAS Committee on Air Sea Interaction. The need for increased effort in this area and, especially, the need for centralized coordination of field programs has been recognized by the ICO and by the Interdepartmental Committee on At- mospheric Sciences (ICAS). As a result the De- partment of Commerce has recently been assigned the responsibility for leadership in coordination of activities which contribute to a coherent national program, in stimulation of interest and under- standing of those parts of the program which need strengthening, and in administrative coordination of area studies in which universities, research in- stitutions, and government agencies may partici- pate. A small staff is being assembled for this purpose. * * * DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE UNITED STATES NAVY Office of Naval Research: $2,734,000 Stereophotography of the sea surface will be used in a program sponsored jointly by ONR, NAVOCEANO, and the Applied Physics Labora- tory of Johns Hopkins University. The program will involve stereophotography conducted from aboard ship by ONR, to determine capillary wave spectra. Measurements of radar backscatter to de- termine the spectra of larger wind waves will be taken by the Applied Physics Laboratory, con- currently with aircraft stereophotography con- ducted by NAVOCEANO. A four-engine aircraft has been made available to Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution by the NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 joint efforts of ONR and NSF, for operation in the Indian Ocean during FY 1964 and FY 1965. Observations made from this airplane will include dropsonde humidity and temperature, wind, solar and albedo radiation fluxes, turbulent transport of heat and water vapor, nuclei counts, cloud distri- bution, and radar observations of precipitation areas. The Scripps Institution of Oceanography will establish a series of wave recorder stations across the Pacific Ocean, from New Zealand to the Aleu- tian Islands. The purpose of the program will be to measure the changes in surface wave spectra as the wave trains traverse the ocean and to de- termine the effects of the trade winds on these spectra. The program was initiated because earlier measurements indicated a discrepancy between theoretical and observed values. * * * Naval Oceanographic Office: $865,000 Emphasis in FY 1965 will be placed on develop- ment of specialized sensors and observational tech- niques for accurate measuring of energy fluxes across the interface. In particular, simultaneous observations of the eddy fluxes of momentum and heat will be attempted at two elevations near the sea surface utilizing extremely sensitive and accu- rate cup anemometer and temperature probes now under development. Field studies will be con- tinued on ARGUS ISLAND, an instrumented tower near Bermuda, and these will include joint data collections by ship and aircraft whenever possible. Investigation of time and space variations of the surface thermal structure will be continued by using airborne radiation thermometer, buoys, and survey ships. Particular attention will be paid to the installation of accurate and reliable sea sur- face temperature sensors on all ships of the synop- tic net, to upgrade the reliability of oceanographic analyses. Studies of two-dimensional wave spectra will be made cooperatively with ONR by using stereophotogrammetric techniques augmented by joint surface-aircraft platforms. Continued inves- tigations of the one-dimensional wave spectra within the limits of the linear theory are also planned. Oceanographic similarities between different re- gions will be studied, to develop methods for pre- dicting conditions in areas where little or no Oceanographic information is presently available. * * ¥ 20 591 Bureau of Ships: $500,000 Laboratory and field work will be conducted by the Navy Electronics Laboratory to gain a better understanding of the fundamental physics of ice formation and breakup. Field observations on tem- porary ice stations will be made in cooperation with ONR and NAVOCEANO. At the Navy Electronics Laboratory, the effect of heat balance on energy transfer in ice (ocean cryology) will continue in studies of sea-ice physics. Computer programming and correlations between data furnished by the Weather Bureau and data obtained in the field will be sought to predict heat radiation levels. Albedo, formation of surface pools, and brine processes will be actively investigated as factors affecting sea ice thickness and bearing strength. Relationships will be established among brine content, plane wave velocity, and flexural strength. Controlled experiments, including for- mation of under-ice brine cells, will continue in the laboratory pool. * * * UNITED STATES ARMY Corps of Engineers Coastal Engineering Research Center: $200,000 Recent effort has been directed toward improy- ing wave generation theory. Data to be collected by automatic reading stations in coastal waters will provide valuable data to support the research effort. The Coastal Engineering Research Center, pres- ently engaged in measuring the effect of fetch on wave generation, will intensify this effort next year. Additional basic data will be provided by install- ing five more wave gages in water of limited fetch. * * * DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Weather Bureau: $208,000 In addition to carrying out its responsibility to the overall program in air/sea interaction which was described in the introduction to this section, the Weather Bureau plans to carry on the follow- ing program. A study will be made with the U.S. Lake Sur- vey and the University of Michigan of turbulent exchange processes near the water surface in Lake Michigan, as it contributes to our knowledge of similar processes in the ocean. Research will con- tinue on the development of a numerical compu- tation program for the prediction of storm surges 592 and transient wind generated currents near the ocean shore. Empirical storm surge prediction methods will also be developed for critical areas of the sea coast. These two activities are a part of the basic severe storm (hurricane) research pro- gram of the Weather Bureau. The empirical storm surge program utilizes data from Coast & Geodetic Survey supplemented by Army Corps of Engineers information. The present air/sea inter- action program will be closely integrated with the oceanographic activities of the Coast and Geodetic Survey. As a part of its studies of tropical meteorology and hurricane research, the Weather Bureau will obtain data and information on wind stress at the ocean surface by means of surface observations from ships or other platforms augmented by data ob- tained from aircraft. The Weather Bureau will carry out radiosonde and surface synoptic meteoro- logical programs, aboard research vessels, in coop- eration with the Coast and Geodetic Survey, Na- tional Science Foundation, Woods Hole Oceano- graphic Institution, and other agencies. The Weather Bureau will continue developmen- tal work on the “MAMOS” buoy and on portable infrared radiometers for use aboard merchant ships in obtaining sea-surface temperatures. 2 2 2 Coast and Geodetic Survey: $25,000 Variations in sea level provide a sensitve indi- cator of the influence of the atmosphere on the sea. As in the past cooperative efforts with the Weather Bureau will be continued in studies of sea level variations and increased research will be conductd to determine the cause of observed “wind tides.” Cooperative developmental work on a buoy system for measuring interface features will also continue. The Coast & Geodetic Survey and Weather Bureau expect to initiate a joint project on instrument evaluation. The two agencies will also cooperate in sponsoring a special symposium on air/sea interaction. * * * DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Commercial Fisheries: $998,000 Research on the effect of the atmosphere on the ocean is concentrated in the central Pacific trade- wind zone and in the eastern Pacific where air/sea interaction is thought to have a strong effect upon the distribution and abundance of commercially NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 valuable fish, such as tuna. Bureau laboratories at Honolulu, San Diego, and Stanford have been active in this work for several years. Based on this work an expanded program of observation and analysis will be directed at understanding changes im ocean structure. * * = National Science Foundation: $300,000 Major projects currently being supported by NSF include studies of energy interchange at the surface, conducted at the University of Washington, and studies of heat and water vapor exchange between ocean and atmosphere, conducted at the University of Michigan. Research support will continue to be given to these and similar projects, as proposed by competent scientists, * * * DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY Coast Guard: $60,000 In 1963 CGC CASCO was outfitted as a proto- type installation for oceanographic observations from weather ships. By the end of FY 1965, twenty-four of the Coast Guard’s 32 ships will have been similarly outfitted. By the end of FY 1965 four offshore towers along the Atlantic Coast will be equipped with wave gauges, tide gauges and other observational equipment for use in air/sea research. A research program dealing with the origin, drift, and attrition of ice hazards to navi- gation will be continued as part of the Coast Guard International Ice Patrol Operations. Research will also be conducted to improve search and rescue techniques. * x * 8. BIOLOGICAL PROPERTIES: $18,611,000 A comprehensive understanding of the distribu- tion, ecology, physiology, the behavior, and the interrelationships of the many marine organisms is needed in order to plan wisely for use of the sea as a greater source of food and to anticipate the response of marine life to environmental changes. To achieve such understanding requires a large scale collection and identification program, and also includes related studies of the physical and chemical properties of the ocean in the ocean sedi- ments. Thoughtful effort is needed to develop a view of marine life on the planetary scale. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE UNITED STATES NAVY Office of Naval Research: $2,142,000 Contracts and grants will continue to support research concerned with fouling by marine organ- isms, to protect swimmers and survivors of ship sinkings from attacks by poisonous or carnivorous marine animals, to understand effects of biological organisms on sound propagation, to predict and control bioluminescence, to understand the me- chanics of fish propulsion, and to understand marine animal communication. A new program on ship fouling involving other ICO bureaus and scientists from many foreign countries will be undertaken. Samples of test panels which have been subjected to fouling in dif- ferent areas of the oceans are to be shipped to a single laboratory within the United States where the fouling organisms will be identified. The pres- ent studies which are confined primarily to fouling in shallow water will be extended to fouling in the deep oceans, with particular emphasis placed on sessile organisms and acoustically significant marine animals. Further effort will be directed toward a better understanding of primary productivity and stand- ing crops of marine organisms as these subjects are related to problems of interest to the Navy. Efforts will be made to develop computer pro- grams for rapid taxonomic and ecological evalua- tion of marine organisms. Increased emphasis will also be given to the closely related biochemical taxonomy and the genetics of marine organisms. * * * Bureau of Ships: $200,000 Research conducted by the Navy Electronics Laboratory is directed at scattering and attenua- tion of underwater sound by plankton and nekton and the noises originated by marine organisms. Both phenomena may interfere with sonar per- formance and complicate submarine detection. By using the bathyscaphe TRIESTE, scientists at NEL will investigate the biological populations of the sea and correlate the observed characteristics of marine life with physical and chemical prop- erties of the water at various depths. During past dives of the TRIESTE, locations of the scattering layers and their composition have been determined by a surface ship employing 12 ke echo sounders, while TRIESTE maneuvered up and down through the layers. 35-377 O—64——_89 22 593 The deep scattering layers in the deep ocean will continue to be investigated during FY 1965. Bathy- scaphe TRIESTE and surface ships will support this effort. Taxonomic studies will be continued in FY 1965 in areas of interest. Acoustic cross sections will be correlated with the species observed. * * * Naval Oceanographic Office: $20,000 NavOceano has made detailed studies of the seasonal setting and growth rates of fouling organ- isms in coastal waters. Recently, such studies have been extended to include the deep water of the Tongue of the Ocean near the Bahamas and they will be extended to other areas including deep water locations. Results have shown a decrease in fouling organisms from the surface through the euphotic zone, with drifting forms below that depth and some boring organisms on the bottom. Collections of marine organisms will continue to be made on Antarctic oceanographic cruises and sent to various universities for study. Also, a study of the distribution and ecology of bioluminescent forms will continue. * * * DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Commercial Fisheries: $9,050,000 Research is needed to achieve three major ob- jectives vital to the mission of BCF: 1. To obtain maximum sustained yields from the sea’s living resources; 2. To reduce the cost of locating and catching fish to a minimum; and 3. To improve basic knowledge of interrelations among the living resources and their environment in order to predict fluctuations in availability and distribution. Explorations off the Columbia River have re- cently given evidence that commercial quantities of fish and shellfish may occur up to depths of at least 3600 feet. As a result of such exploratory fishing, commercial operations have started in a number of areas on what were unknown or under- exploited resources. The Bureau will continue to devote considerable research effort toward gaining a better under- standing of the oceans and to develop reliable methods for predicting places and times of fish concentration. For example, since 1959, annual predictions based on changes in ocean circulation have been made for the catch of the Hawaiian skipjack fishery. These data are proving to be of considerable importance to the fishing industry. 594 In conformity with international agreements re- search will continue on various marine animals. BCF has pioneered the use of serology, or blood group analysis, in the identification and separation of races, or subpopulations, of marine fishes. Ex- pansion of university support for taxonomic re- search is planned. Bureau scientists have also made important con- tributions to the knowledge of the physiology and behavior of fishes and invertebrates and strengthen their efforts in the field of taxonomy. Expansion of these studies at Woods Hole, La Jolla, and Honolulu is planned. The Bureau participates in a number of inter- national commissions concerned with the conserva- tion and use of marine resources. Much of the Bureau’s research effort will continue to concern salmon and fur seal in the North Pacific, tuna in the Eastern Tropical Pacific and groundfish in the shallower coastal waters. Studies will be continued on the artificial culture of marine organisms, particularly shellfish in order to determine their response to changes. will * * * Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife: $262,000 The BSF&W research program consists of the following two objectives: 1. Life history studies of fish species, to fill gaps in knowledge about distri- bution in space and time, age, rates of growth, identity, sizes of populations, migratory habits, food habits, reproductive seasons, enemies, para- sites, and diseases; and 2. Analysis of environ- ments, to identify and measure factors affecting distribution, movements, abundance, and well-be- ing of game-fish species. Laboratory and field research will continue at the Bureau’s Atlantic Laboratory on Sandy Hook, New Jersey, and its Pacific Laboratory at Tiburon, California. Several broad-based programs are planned for FY 1965. The Bureau plans full participation in a coastwide cooperative effort to study the life his- tory and environment of game species. Charter vessels will be used for inshore and continental shelf investigations. Construction of a field laboratory has been planned on Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island, to study migration of fishes along the Atlantic coast. Research will be conducted on the life history of such species as sea trout, bluefish, swordfish, and sharks, principally through support of graduate students in universities, NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 The environmental tolerances and behavior of marine fishes in seawater tanks will be studied. * * * Geological Survey: $56,000 USGS will extend its research efforts on modern organisms and sedimentary environments to gain a better understanding of fossil marine fauna and ancient sedimentary rocks. This information is im- portant in increasing the accuracy of correlations between land and sea areas in the exploration for oil and other resources. In cooperation with BCF, the USGS will continue environmental studies of sessile marine organisms contained on and in sedi- ments of bays and the continental shelves. * * * National Science Foundation: $5,925,000 NSF will continue to support a wide variety of studies of life and living processes in the sea. In FY 1965, an orderly continuation of growth is planned to support research in systematic biogeo- graphic and analogical relations of marine animals and plants and their interactions with the marine environment. Increased support will also be pro- vided for shiptime in biological oceanography and for the expansion and improvement of marine lab- oratories and their graduate training programs. Two oceangoing vessels, one in the Pacific and one in the Atlantic, will be used cooperatively by scientists from many universities throughout the country with emphasis on basic research and grad- uate training in marine biology. * * * Smithsonian Institution: $881,000 Within the National Oceanograhic Program, the main responsibility of the Smithsonian Insti- tution will continue to be the collection, preserva- tion, and study of marine materials made by the Smithsonian Institution itself, by other Federal agencies, and by private organizations referring collections to the Institution. The Smithsonian Oceanographic Sorting Center will process speci- mens collected for the National Program as a serv- ice to the scientific community. During the past year, nearly 4000 lots comprising over 300,000 specimens were sorted for distribution to special- ists in various groups for study. This modest be- ginning includes the first collections from the two large cooperative oceanographic efforts: the Inter- national Indian Ocean Expedition (ILOE) and the International Cooperative Investigations of the Tropical Atlantic (ICITA). NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 The addition of taxonomists in FY 1965 to the marine sciences staff will increase the quantity of systematic research. The Smithsonian Institution will participate in expeditions of other govern- mental and private vessels, to gather information on the kinds and distribution of organisms in the sea. The Smithsonian Oceanographic Sorting Center will expand its capabilities to embrace the areas of algology, sedimentology, and planktonology. Improved methods of sorting and the introduction of mechanical devices will be exploited to speed up sorting. The volume of collections processed is expected to increase tremendously. * * * DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE Public Health Service: $75,000 PHS is concerned with water quality for all legitimate uses, purity of foods delivered from the sea, and the effects of marine organisms on the human body. Another PHS objective is to determine the iden- tity of medically or pharmacologically important substances which may be produced by marine or- ganisms. Earlier studies on marine organisms which pro- duce toxins (such as paralytic shellfish poison) will be continued. Emphasis will be placed on the ecology of marine organisms producing neurotoxins which are endangering public health. PHS will also continue studies of marine substances which appear to inhibit the growth of certain human disease-producing viruses and bacteria. A research program will be undertaken in cooperation with the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries on the ecology and growth characteristics of the bacteria respon- sible for Type E botulism toxin in fishery products. * ba * 4. STRUCTURE AND HISTORY OF THE OCEAN FLOOR: $19,235,000 Very rapid strides have been made in the last decade in observing and understanding the struc- ture of the 70% of the earth’s crust which is covered by the sea and in reading the history of the earth as revealed in ocean sediments. New instruments and instrumental techniques of great precision and great power have been applied to these problems: precision depth recorders, acoustic refraction tech- 24 595 niques, gravity meters, sensitive magnetometers, deep coring facilities, and ocean bottom photog- raphy. Understanding of the structure of the ocean floor and of the sediments will contribute very greatly to the larger understanding of the earth’s structure and history, and it may have economic benefits in ocean mining of minerals and drilling for oil. * * * DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE UNITED STATES NAVY Office of Naval Research: $9,572,000 Using new seismic instruments and observational techniques, Lamont Geological Observatory, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, Texas A&M University, and the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution will continue comprehensive seismic investigation of the bottom structure of the Atlan- tic and Pacific basins and the Indian Ocean. In the same oceans, Woods Hole and Texas A&M will make geomagnetic measurements. Lamont, UCLA, Oregon State, and the University of Hawaii will take gravity measurements. Continued effort will be applied in FY 65 to developing still better techniques for measuring the thickness of sediment. In addition, a modest but comprehensive pro- gram will be undertaken to determine from manned ice islands the structure of the Arctic Ocean basin. * * * Naval Oceanographic Office: $261,000 To improve the accuracy of gravity measure- ments from ships, gravity ranges are being estab- lished off the United States, in both the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. A mathematical formulation to reduce the gravity field to different altitudes above sea level is being programmed for a com- puter. Observations of variation in telluric currents and the relation of telluric currents to the geomagnetic field will be continued in FY 1965. Recently initi- ated studies of temporal variations and small-scale spatial variations in the geomagnetic field will con- tinue. Improvements in automatic processing of marine geophysical data (gravity, geomagnetism, telluric currents) will also be made in FY 1965. * Bureau of Ships: $1,125,000 Geological-geophysical research will be supported at the Navy Electronics Laboratory and at the La- 596 mont Geological Observatory, with emphasis on problems of sound propagation applied to under- sea warfare. In FY 1965 studies will continue of geological structure, sedimentation processes, and mass physi- cal properties of sediments, by using the TRIESTE and other vehicles. Research on deeper off-shore areas will be emphasized. Theoretical studies of properties, useful in determining stability of sedi- ments when only partial information is available, will require emphasis on the interrelation of shear strength, density, porosity, and consolidation. La- mont Geological Observatory and NEL will con- tinue their complementary investigations. Addi- tional properties, including electrical resistivity, will be measured. Stereo-color photographic techniques for sea floor work will be improved. Observational and instrumental techniques for obtaining informa- tion on the processes of erosion, turbidity currents, and sediment transport will be developed. Im- proved acoustical techniques for probing and re- cording the bottom and sub-bottom characteristics will be emphasized. * * * Bureau of Naval Weapons: $75,000 The Bureau’s Naval Ordnance Laboratory will continue to investigate the earth’s magnetic field and its sea-floor fluctuation. In the coming fiscal year, DEEP-DIP will be used in an expanded pro- gram of data collection and analyses. * * * UNITED STATES ARMY Corps of Engineers Coastal Engineering Research Center: $290,000 Tide and wave studies will be intensified to re- late quantitatively storm wave attacks and resulting shore erosion. Investigations will attempt to lo- cate in 30 to 50 feet of water potential beach sand sources for beach re-supply off the Florida and Dela- ware coasts. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Coast and Geodetic Survey: $188,000 In-house research will continue in marine grav- ity, magnetism, estuarine and shelf structure, and sediment transport. For FY 1965, the projects planned include continuing study of heat flow through the sea floor, theories of the origin of ocean basins, submarine geomorphology of the western Aleutians and East Coast Shelf, sedimentation of 25 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 estuaries and coastal regions, sub-bottom acoustic properties, and the nature of marine magnetics and gravity. Preliminary research in the area of marine seismology will be initiated. A cooperative pro- gram with the USGS is being planned to study the offshore geological properties along the Pacific Coast of the continental United States. * * * DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR Geological Survey: $520,000 New maps of regional topography, marine sedi- ment distribution, and underlying geologic struc- ture are being prepared as part of the joint USGS- Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution study of the marine geology and hydrology of the Atlantic continental shelf and slope. Similar studies of marine geology and hydrology of the continental shelf and slope along the West Coast will be initi- ated in FY 1965 in cooperation with the Coast & Geodetic Survey. The Geological Survey will be responsible for operations on land, including proc- essing and laboratory studies of samples collected at sea and will acquire and analyze existing geo- logical and geophysical information needed to in- terpret the off-shore data. The C&GS will be re- sponsible for operations at sea. Scientists of the two organizations will collaborate in the collection of samples and data at sea and in the interpretation and publication of the results. The USGS will continue to collect and interpret existing geological and biological data concerning the Gulf Coast and Alaska continental shelves. Operations on the Atlantic continental shelf will be augmented by the addition of bottom coring. Studies of bottom samples and geophysical data from the North Pacific Ocean and elsewhere, col- lected by the Coast & Geodetic Survey and by other organizations, will continue. * * * Bureau of Mines: $104,000 The small economic evaluation programs of ocean floor minerals, carried on with the coopera- tion of Oregon State University and Scripps Insti- tution of Oceanography, has revealed the exist- ence of possible valuable nearshore deposits of glauconite and has indicated surprising variability in the composition of deep sea manganese nodules. In order to extend these investigations, engineer- ing studies of deep sea mining equipment will be initiated in FY 1965. Collection and analysis of NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 minerals will be continued with the cooperation of universities and institutes. Mining methods, cost research, and metallurgi- cal work on manganese, phosphorite, and other commercially valuable sea minerals will be con- tinued. * * * National Science Foundation: $7,100,000 Geological, geochemical, and geophysical oceano- graphic investigations are supported at many uni- versities and research institutes including: Miami, California, Delaware, Illinois, Washington, Michi- gan, Southern California, Georgia, Florida State, Columbia, Lehigh, California Institute of Tech- nology, Oregon State University, Massachusetts In- stitute of Technology, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Yale, and Rice. : The FY 1965 program will highlight continued expansion of effort in bathymetric investigations; age determination of marine sedimentary deposits; paleotemperature studies; sediment distribution studies and drilling operations; organic and inor- ganic geochemistry; sediment transport mechan- isms; and seismic, gravity, and geothermal inves- tigations. * * * 5. MODIFICATION OF THE SEA: $8,862,000 Undesirable and dangerous effects of pollution of coastal and estuarine waters on food resources and on recreational areas are already well known and are likely to imcrease unless checked by wise planning. The potential danger of release of radio- active material in the ocean also needs thorough and continuing study. In each of these cases re- search of various kinds is essential. The ocean also can be deliberately modified in local areas in order to achieve certain desirable results: beach erosion can be controlled, surface waves minimized, evaporation reduced, etc. At present, achievements of this sort are minimal; but research directed toward increased useful modifica- tion of the sea is needed. * * * DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE UNITED STATES NAVY Office of Naval Research: $400,000 In 1965, Chesapeake Bay Institute will continue their investigations of dispersion using the recently developed rhodamine-B dye-tracer techniques. 26 597 Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution and Scripps Institution of Oceanography will study organisms concentrating certain radioactive isotopes to determine the rate of radioactivity introduced in the oceans by fallout from nuclear weapons tests. The program of measuring carbon dioxide con- centrations and the carbon-14 ratios in the oceans and atmosphere will be continued at University of Rhode Island and Scripps Institution of Ocean- ography to determine whether man’s activities are resulting in an increase of climatic temperatures. % * * Naval Oceanographic Office: $19,000 Investigation of natural background isotopic radiation, which has been recently initiated, will be continued and extended. * * * UNITED STATES ARMY Corps of Engineers Coastal Engineering Research Center: $333,000 Studies of tidal changes resulting from man-made works in the tidewater areas will be investigated both in the laboratory and in the field, leading to a better understanding of flushing characteristic of bays and estuaries. Quantitative studies to re- late-tidal flow to man-made changes in inlets will be initiated. * * * DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Commercial Fisheries: $865,000 The Bureau will continue investigating the ac- cumulation of radioactivity by marine species and its transmission to man. Research will also be directed toward understanding the effects of pesti- cides on commercial fish. Estuarine studies con- ducted to determine the effect upon commercial fish of proposed engineering changes in coastlines, waterways, marshes, and bays will continue. Investigations will be undertaken in FY 1965 on marine and brackish-water pollution. Research on rapidly changing coastal and estuarine envi- ronments will be expanded to determine the ex- tent to which engineering and industrial develop- ments are altering the natural biological, physical, and chemical regimes and, consequently, the pro- ductivity of these areas. In cooperation with the Atomic Energy Com- mission, research on the biological effects of radio- active materials will be continued and expanded, with more attention paid to the use of radioactive 598 tracers in studies of feeding and nutrition of marine organisms. * * * Geological Survey: $60,000 Studies of the distribution and disposal of radio- active materials and organic wastes within the marine environment will be included as part of general studies on marine geology, sedimentation, and hydrology referred to earlier in this report. * * * DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE The HEW budget includes an estimated $50,000 for fellowships granted by the Office of Education under the National Defense Education Act. These fellowships are described under the Manpower and Training section of this report. * * * Public Healih Service: $2,430,000 PHS has initiated studies on the effects of munic- ipal and industrial waste. discharges on water quality and aquatic life in the estuaries and in coastal areas. These studies will be conducted in Raritan Bay, the Chesapeake-Susquehanna River Estuary, Puget Sound, Columbia River Estuary, and the Delaware River Estuary. Further studies will be supported by PHS research grants concerned with the following: oceanographic factors affecting design of sewers (University of California) ; rela- tionship of the environment to ocean pollution (University of Southern California) ; methods for sea water analysis (New York University); ocean outfall diffusers (Oregon State University); estu- arial pollution factors (Oregon State University) ; insecticides in marine environment (Texas A & M Research Foundation) ; metabolism of marine bays (University of Texas) ; effects of thermal effluents on marine organisms (Virginia Institute of Marine Science); feasibility of waste disposal in marine environment (University of Southern California) ; estuarine pollution problems (University of Florida) . PHS shellfish sanitation laboratory facilities at Kingston, Rhode Island; Dauphin Island, Alabama; and Purdy, Washington, will undertake research on the fate of pathogenic microorganisms (includ- ing viruses) in the marine waters and on the ac- cumulation of suspended, colloidal, dissolved, and radioactive pollutants by shellfish. Additional re- search facilities under construction in Rhode Island will be used in investigating the effects of pollution 27 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 on shellfish and other aquatic life, on recreational facilities, and other water use. * * * Atomic Energy Commission: $4,705,000 Scientists of BCF, supported by the AEC, will continue to study the distribution and abundance of fish, shellfish, and other biota in limited oceanic and coastal regions of particular concern to the AEC. Increasing emphasis will be placed on eco- logical studies of the marine food web, to demon- strate and measure the cycling of nutrients and trace elements. A part of the AEC’s marine sciences program will be devoted to measuring and defining the chemical and physical forms which radionuclides can take in sea water. Processes which dilute and those which concentrate radionuclides will continue to be studied using tracers such as rhodamine-B and short-half-life radioisotopes. The AEC will support studies to define and to measure coastal circulation or to determine the possible influences of one estuary on another or of the open ocean on a particular estuary. On a large scale (ocean basin size), AEC will support studies to determine mixing times and circulation patterns. Techniques will include measurement of distribu- tion of fallout nuclides, cosmogenically formed nuclides like carbon-14, and natural partitions of activities in the uranium and thorium decay series. Studies of oceanic sediments to determine mecha- nisms of formation and rate of deposition are among other objectives to be pursued. * * * 6. DEEP SEA RESEARCH VEHICLE PROGRAM The oceanographic community recognizes an urgent need for underseas vehicles to provide an additional degree of freedom to oceanographic re- search. A few federal agencies have enunciated their interest in DRV development, as embodied in various chapters of this report. To meet the need for concerted attention to the development problem, the Interagency Committee on Oceanography has documented the scientific requirements of many branches of oceanography for deep submersibles and selected this area for special emphasis beginning in FY 1965. The re- quirements and the program proposed to satisfy them will be described in an ICO Pamphlet supple- mentary to this volume. The primary objective of the proposed DRV re- NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 search program is to apply the advantages offered by this unique tool to urgent research problems in oceanography. Deep sea research vehicles will enable a more “‘personal” type of research than has traditionally been the case in a science frus- trated by the high pressure environment. The trained mind and eyes can be taken to the source of information, on a relatively stable working plat- form. Another advantage offered by a well equipped DRV concerns the instantaneous control over the experiment, by the observer on the spot. Delicate adjustments and revised programming of instrumentation can be executed to adjust to the requirements of the observer. The DRV platform aids in lowering the observational sensitivity thres- hold commensurate with the superiority of the eye over most instruments. As a test platform, it per- mits on-the-scene evaluation of new devices and instrumentation. f Potentially, the greatest value of the DRV lies in its own development process. Clearly, the United States must attain a deep ocean engineering capa- bility if it is to exploit its surrounding waters more eficiently and completely. An entirely new technology is needed to build in this environment the off-shore structures, moored buoys and bottom mounted arrays of instruments important to research and national defense. Deep sea research vehicles will enable the marine engi- neer to survey and study undersea areas where he plans to build. With a DRV, model structures and equipment prototypes may be located where their performance can be observed long enough to under- stand the limitations which are imposed by the sea environment. These, then, are a few of the immediate, prac- tical applications of the DRV to marine engineer- ing. The ultimate exploitation of the ocean floor presents engineering problems of a new and dif- ferent kind. DRVs will be needed to survey and explore mineral deposits. Then, to mine these resources man will have to go underwater—to work. Tools will have to be developed to dig, drill and manipulate safely at tremendous pressures. Ex- perience obtained in DRV construction and oper- ation is needed to design and to build these future engines of the deep. Out of a broadly conceived program for research using underseas vehicles can come an understand- ing of search and rescue techniques that would help locate and recover lost vehicles, space capsules or other items on the bottom of the sea. This subject 28 599 is being examined in cooperation with the Navy's Deep Submergence Systems Review Group. Fiscal Year 1965 plans encompass operation of existing vehicles in various research projects and design and construction of new models. The only vehicles which will be available to the oceanographic community in FY 65 are the bathy- scaph TRIESTE, the ALVIN, and possibly the ALUMINAUT. The Bureau of Ships will fund TRIESTE’s in- vestigations at the Naval Electronics Laboratory. These will include studies of: (a) wave generation and wave spectra; (b) the Deep Scattering Layer; (c) correlation of characteristics of biological popu- lations with physical and chemical properties of the water; (d) fine-grain structure of the ocean bottom; and (e) sedimentation processes. These studies are planned for both near-shore and deep off-shore areas. TRIESTE has infinite depth capability, can carry 3 occupants, and can cruise at slightly more than a knot. The Office of Naval Research will sponsor the evaluation of ALVIN’s capabilities at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. This study will be important in determining the future roles to be played by DRV’s in oceanographic research. It is believed at this point that the ALVIN type of vehicle will have particular application to under- water acoustics, biological and geological investi- gations. The ALVIN will be designed to carry two operators at a speed of 2-4 knots at depths up to 6000 ft. The Office of Naval Research plans to construct one DRV in FY 65. It will utilize the ALVIN’s spare pressure sphere and thus will be similar in capability to that vehicle. Design and construction plans for FY 65 are still somewhat fluid; at least with respect to Navy’s program they will depend to a great extent on the findings and recommenda- tions of the Deep Submergence Systems Review Group. The ALUMINAUT is being constructed by Electric Boat Company under contract to the Rey- nolds Metals Co. Completion is expected in 1965. It is being designed to carry three operators at cruising speeds of 4-6 knots, to depths up to 15,000 feet. * * * B. Oceanographic Services Ocean surveys and operation of the oceano- graphic data center are services which the federal government carries out for the benefit of the entire 600 oceanographic community, universities and research institutes as well as government agencies. 1. OCEAN SURVEYS: $25,014,000 The survey program is aimed at the intelligent collection of accurate and meaningful data at sea, data required both by various specific mission- oriented agencies and to serve the basic purpose of providing a framework of oceanic knowledge upon which future exploitation and research must depend. The rationale, purpose, and objectives of the survey program have been spelled out in detail in the National Plan for Ocean Surveys (ICO Pub. No. 7, May 1963). The survey program is responsive not only to the immediate demands of the Federal agencies for oceanographic data, but also provides the basic information which the research oceanographer needs to formulate the questions he must ask— questions for which his own research work at sea will provide the answers. rs Surveys are planned and carried out on a field- season basis. This runs generally from January or February to November and thus overlaps two fiscal years. As in previous ICO reports, the discussions that follow are for the 1964 field season and cover the latter half of FY 1964 and the first half of FY 1965. The survey schedule, as presented here is drawn in general terms, still subject to change in specifics. The operations research study of ocean surveys funded by the Coast and Geodetic Survey will be completed during the first half of FY 1965. The survey program for subsequent years will reflect this detailed analysis of the government’s ocean survey operations. * NAVY—$14,704,000 * * Atlantic USS TANNER—Deep water hydrographic surveys in Western Atlantic, coastal surveys of Central America. USS REQUISITE—Military oceanographic-hydro- graphic surveys (Oceanographic stations, acous- tics, bottom reflectivity) . USNS GILLISS—Surveys in western Atlantic for Navy Laboratories (prediction of three-dimen- sional thermal structure, sound transmission and water characteristics, buoy arrays for heat and water exchange in deep water, “meso-scale” struc- 29 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 ture near Gulf Stream, electromagnetic phe- nomena) . : USNS SANDS—Scheduled to join fleet in 1965. AGS— (Unnamed) 2250 tons. Shakedown in early FY 1965. Automated collection of temperature, speed of sound and ambient light data vs. depth. Also bathymetric, sea surface temperature, mag- netic field, and gravity data. Pacific-Indian USS MAURY—Hydrographic surveys of Manila Bay and Subic Bay, shoal investigation. USS SERRANO—Works with MAURY in Philip- pines. Upon completion will conduct oceano- graphic surveys in Western Pacific as schedule permits. USS REHOBOTH—Oceanographic surveys of Point Arguello, California, currents by measurement and computation. USNS DAVIS—Cooperative cruise of Oceanographic Office and west coast Navy laboratory, San Diego- Philippines-Japan. Oceanographic and acoustics measurements with submarine BAYA. Experi- ments with underwater research vehicle and ship- board positioning system for vehicle. USNS LYNCH—Will be completed during FY 1965. Will work with Davis and icebreakers in studies of polar water masses and their circulation. This information will be used in sea-ice predictions. AIRCRAFT—WV-2 aircraft with side-looking radar will be used for all-weather ice studies. COAST AND GEODETIC SURVEY—$9,101,000 Atlantic EXPLORER—Oceanographic/hydrographic surveys of Sonda de Vieques, P.R. Later in the year will shift to area of east coast of U.S. and continental shelf area of Cape Hatteras, doing magnetic sur- veys, oceanographic stations, deep-sea photog- raphy, coring operations, biological studies, and current studies. Duke University will cooperate. HYDROGRAPHER—Hydrographic surveys off- shore north of Miami, then Sabine Pass in the Gulf of Mexico. Oceanographic stations and bot- tom samples. WHITING—Hydrographic surveys off South Caro- lina and Florida. Whiting will also survey Nan- tucket Sound area if not used in cooperative Gulf Stream studies. PIERCE—Same as WHITING, but with more ex- tensive work in the hydrographic surveys. If Gulf Stream surveys are not carried out, magnetic, photographic, and bottom material studies will be done cooperating with Geological Survey. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 MARMER—Current studies in the Chesapeake Bay in cooperation with Virginia Institute of Marine Sciences and Chesapeake Bay Institute. Pacific-Indian PIONEER—Working International Indian Ocean Expedition in Bay of Bengal, Andaman Sea and Indian Ocean, enroute measurements of gravity, magnetic field, bottom topography, tem- perature structure, surface temperature and salinity, surface and upper air meteorological observations, plankton hauls, productivity stud- ies. Cooperating with Weather Bureau, USGS, NavOceano, BCF, Scripps Institution of Oceanog- raphy and University of Hawaii. Special surveys in Philippine, Yap and Mariana Trenches. Special intensive study of Palau Trench in cooperation with Geological Survey. SURVEYOR—Profiles of gravity, magnetic field, bottom topography, and other oceanographic and meteorological observations between Hawaii and the Aleutians, east of 170°W. Also, intensive study of a selected seamount in cooperation with University of Hawaii and USGS. Water circula- tion, and changes in geophysical properties near seamounts will be studied. Oregon State Univer- sity is cooperating to supply gravity meter and geophysicists. PATHIFINDER—Hydrographic, magnetic oceanographic surveys off Maui and inshore sur- veys in Cook Inlet, Alaska. BOWIE and HODGSON—Water Puget Sound, Washington. LESTER JONES and PATTON—Hydrographic surveys in Clarence Strait and Carroll Inlet, Ketchikan, Alaska. OCEANOGRAPHER-—Shakedown trials, some oce- anographic surveys depending on scheduled time available. DISCOVERER—Same as OCEANOGRAPHER. in and circulation in U. S. COAST GUARD—$439,000 Atlantic Ocean Station Vessels. Eighteen of the ships of this type will be equipped with oceanographic winches and laboratories developed from tests of different methods used on board CGC CASCO. Monthly observations of standard sections are planned. Plankton samples will be taken in co- operation with Lamont Geological Observatory. Underway plankton samplers are being used be- tween stations “B” (56-30 N, 51-00W) and “D” 30 601 (dt N, 41 W) in cooperation with Edinburgh Marine Laboratory. EVERGREEN —Survey Grand Banks-Labrador Cur- rent-Gulf Stream area from March through July for International Ice Patrol Operations. Will enter Labrador Sea and Davis Strait on a post- season cruise. Also will make thirtieth annual occupation of the oceanographic section between Labrador and Greenland. AIRCRAFT—Airborne radiation thermometer flights between Cape Cod and Cape May, in co- operation with Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife. Pacific NORTHWIND-—Survey and research operations in Arctic Ocean. Cooperation with ONR, Nav- Oceano, and non-government agencies. OCEAN STATION VESSELS—“N” (30°N-140° W) and “V” (34°N-164°E) will receive instru- mentation as noted under Atlantic above. AIRCRAFT —Airborne radiation thermometer flights in cooperation with BCF. U. S$. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY—$20,000 Atlantic Research in cooperation with the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in Atlantic Continental Shelf Program. Ships of other agencies will provide working platforms on opportunity basis. Pacific Palau Trench work in cooperation with C&GS, cooperating with Hawaiian Volcano Observatory and C&GS with dredge and photographic methods in study of submarine lavas of the Pacific. Joint C&GS survey from U.S. Pacific Coast westward. BUREAU OF COMMERCIAL FISHERIES— $40,000 Atlantic The BCF plans to continue to place biologists and biological sampling equipment aboard the survey vessels of other agencies working in the Atlantic. They will also participate in the final phases of the International Cooperative Investigations of the Tropical Atlantic and conduct investigations on the distribution of bottom fauna in the northwest Atlantic in relation to geological factors. Pacific The BCF will continue to place biologists and sampling equipment aboard the survey vessels of 602 other agencies working in the Pacific. During FY 1965 they will conduct preliminary cruises in the central Pacific to develop methods and test equip- ment in preparation for the Trade Wind Zone Oceanography Program which will get under way with full-scale field operations early in FY 1966. The Bureau will continue its studies on surface temperature distribution in the eastern Pacific and the production of temperature charts. BUREAU OF MINES—$30,000 Pacific Survey activity in the Pacific Ocean will be con- centrated in the occurrence of minerals in the waters and under the seas. The major efforts will be in and on the Continental Shelf, although some effort may be directed toward the deep sea occurrence of manganese nodules and other related minerals. U. S. PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE—$680,000 Atlantic Continued studies of deterioration of water quality in coastal areas affected by urbanization and industrial development. Effects on food supply and recreational use will be studied. Surveys of Atlantic and Gulf Coasts will be directed from laboratories at Kingston, Rhode Island and Dau- phin Island, Alabama, respectively. Pacific Studies of coastal waters affected by urban and industrial development, and special study of prob- lems of deterioration of water quality, to be directed from laboratory at Purdy, Washington. 2. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC DATA CENTER: $1,054,000 To meet the need for a centralized respository of oceanographic data, the National Oceanographic Data Center has been established in Washington, D.C., under the guidance of an Advisory Board, representing six supporting agencies and the Na- tional Academy of Sciences. NODC is a central clearing house for data received from government agencies, scientific institutions, and other nations engaged in research and survey work. NODC com- piles, processes, and preserves data in a form per- mitting rapid retrieval. All ICO programs produce data for the NODC. dl NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 C. International Oceanographic Programs The importance of international cooperation in oceanography has been recognized through the in- creased participation of the United States and other countries in several intergovernmental oceano- graphic programs. This growth is largely attribut- able to the work of UNESCO and the Intergovern- mental Oceanographic Commission (IOC). The Commission was launched under the auspices of UNESCO, and currently includes fifty member governments from all parts of the world. The pur- pose of the Commission is to promote scientific investigation into the nature and resources of the oceans through the concerted action of its mem- bers. In bringing together the oceanographers of many countries, the Commission has focused atten- tion on oceanographic problems beyond the capac- ity of individual nations to handle. Deliberations of the Commission have also been concerned with international problems of data exchange, standard- ization of equipment, intercalibration of techniques, allocation of radio frequencies for oceanographic use, exchange of scientists, and other problenis fundamental to successful international coordina- tion and cooperation. 1. INTERNATIONAL INDIAN OCEAN EXPEDITION (IIOE) Although the Indian Ocean’s 28,000,000 square miles cover over 14 percent of the earth’s surface, relatively little was known or understood about the region prior to the initiation of the ILOE in 1960. The objective of the IIOE is to delineate the fea- tures of the ocean’s topography, circulation, and distribution of living organisms. This goal will be attained by research efforts in air/sea interaction; studies of physical and chemical properties of the ocean’s water; investigation of life in the sea; and, geological and geophysical studies of the ocean’s basin. Most field aspects of the expedition will ter- minate in Fiscal Year 1965. Nations participating with the United States in- clude Australia, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Japan, Pakistan, Portugal, South Africa, Thailand, and the United Kingdom. Nearly 40 ships, of which 12 are American, share responsibility for the field operations. The U. S. budget for FY 1965 for the IIOE amounts to nearly 4.0 million. The United States has contributed slightly over one third the total] support for this expedition, with most of the re- NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 mainder coming from Japan, U.K., Australia. U.S.S.R., Germany, France, and India. An interesting highlight of the IIOE has been the establishment of two data centers: the International Meteorological Center, Bombay, India; and, the Indian Ocean Biological Center, Ceylon, India. Both centers may become permanent establish- ments after the completion of the IIOE. 2. INTERNATIONAL COOPERATIVE INVESTIGATIONS OF THE TROPICAL ATLANTIC (ICITA) The objective of the ICITA is the detailed in- vestigation of the marine environment in the Tropical Atlantic, for purposes of efficient exploit- ation of its fisheries resources. This program was conceived and planned in 1961 and 1962. Other participating nations include the Soviet Union, Brazil, Argentina, Ivory Coast, Nigeria, Republic of Congo (Brazzaville) , Spain, Japan, and Poland. Field operations commenced February 15, 1963, as Equalant I and continued through March 18, 1963. Equalant II took place August 1 to August 15, 1963. These phases have been successfully com- pleted. Thirteen and 11 vessels participated in Equalant I, and Equalant IT, respectively. Many foreign and American scientists and students participated in the program, with the U.S.A. and U.S.S.R., each con- tributing from 14 to 14 of the total support of the program. Significant information on the fluctua- tion and physical-chemical properties of the equa- torial undercurrent were obtained. In addition, effective data exchange arrangements, communica- tions, and standardization techniques were estab- lished. Based on the results of the achievements of the first two phases, the IOC Bureau in October 1963 approved a further extension of the program. Equalant III will be a more loosely coordinated program with scientists free to explore leads de- veloped during Equalant’s I and II, but, as in the other phases, will include a quasi-synoptic program. It will be conducted in the spring of 1964, and it is expected that several additional countries will Participate. Data from Equalant I are scheduled for publication in early 1964. Equalant IJ data were being processed at the end of 1963. The $3 Million costs (to date) to U.S. agencies, are split among the research categories wherein the work has been reported. The ICITA program has been closely coordinated with the Guinean Trawling Survey which is ex- ploring the near shore fishery resources of the Gulf 32 603 of Guinea. The Survey is primarily supported by the U.S. Agency for International Development (AID) . 3. U.S-JAPAN INVESTIGATIONS OF THE PACIFIC The National Science Foundation is coordinating the U.S. participation in the U.S.-Japan Coopera- tive Science Programs. The overall aim of the pro- gram is the fostering of close working relations be- tween the two governments and the pooling of their resources toward solution of common scientific problems. Work in two areas has been initiated in the Pacific: “Earth Sciences of the Pacific’ and “Geography and Ecology of Plants and Organisms’; and this work involves four on-going oceanographic projects. It is probable that this number will be in- creased somewhat in FY 1965. 4. U.S.-LATIN AMERICAN PROGRAMS As a result of the National Academy of Sciences’ Inter-American Conference on the Marine Sciences, several small programs in oceanography will be undertaken between the United States and various South American nations. The first to be initiated will be a cooperative effort between Panama, Co- lombia, Equador, Peru, and the United States to investigate the “El Nino” phenomenon. Other pro- grams, notable in the exchange of teaching and research personnel, are being considered. Numerous smaller international programs will be undertaken cooperatively between the United States and other nations—principally the Latin American countries. In general, these will be informal pro- grams arranged between the scientists of individual institutions. An example of these are the joint in- vestigations in the South Atlantic by the Lamont Geological Observatory and the Argentine Navy Hy- drographic Office. This cooperative effort has been continuing in an effective manner for nearly a decade. 5. COOPERATIVE STUDY OF THE KUROSHIO A multi-nation investigation of the Kuroshio current has been proposed for commencement in FY 1965. The objectives are the: a. detailed description of the Kuroshio current proper and the water masses of the surrounding regions; b. examination of the living populations of the region; 604 c. study of the interaction between the ocean and atmosphere. The United States has been urged to cooperate in this study, but has not yet committed any funds or effort. Countries committed to date include Viet- nam, Hong Kong, Philippines, Nationalist China, Korea, Japan, and the U.S.S.R. Periods of 30-45 days each have been proposed for actual field oper- ations to occur during the summer and winter of 1965 and 1966. 6. PROGRAM FOR WORLD OCEANOGRAPHIC STUDY A Long-term Comprehensive Program for World Ocean Study is being developed for the Intergov- 33 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 ernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC), by the Special Committee on Oceanic Research (SCOR) of the International Council of Scientific Unions (ICSU) , IOC’s advisory body on the general scientific aspects of oceanography. SCOR is drawing up a General Scientific Framework around which the comprehensive study will be built. The initial phases of this program are planned for FY 1965. The following categories of scientific problems are being examined: near shore processes and rela- tionships, biology of the open ocean, geology of the sea floor and the earth beneath the sea; hydro- dynamics of ocean waters, physics and chemistry of ocean waters, interactions between sea and air, and applications of oceanic research. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 605 Chapter II OCEANOGRAPHIC RESOURCES Oceanographic resources consist of the capabili- ties needed to support the oceanographic effort: A. Ships; B. Instrumentation; C. Facilities; and D. Manpower and Training. A. Ships: $21,350,000 For FY 1965, the ICO is recommending funding for construction of five new ships, for the outfitting of one other to provide a capability for oceanog- raphic work, and for design studies for a ship planned for future construction. The budget is down sharply from the shipbuild- ing budgets for FY 1963 and 1964; the drop in budget will have the effect of delaying the creation of a fully effective oceanographic observing pro- gram as outlined in the Ten Year Plan. The level has been chosen as the minimum building program needed to maintain the momentum in oceanog- raphic research developed in the last few years; that is, the minimum needed to replace obsolete ships and to keep research groups working at an effective and efficient pace. A listing of 100 oceanog- raphic survey/research ships is offered in the Ap- pendix. The various agencies contribute to the oveanog- raphic ship building program in the following way: Coast and Geodetic Survey: $9,000,000 The C&GS will build one survey ship of approxi- mately 2,800 tons which will be largely self-sustain- ing in its operations and capable of carrying out hydrographic and oceanographic surveys anywhere in the world. It will have a wide range of data- collecting capability and will work primarily in support of the Ocean Survey Program. Capabilities for servicing oceanographic buoys and supporting deep research vehicles are being included in the design of this ship. Coast Guard: $50,000 The CG will design an oceanographic ship to replace EVERGREEN in International Ice Patrol and other CG oceanographic research and surveys. This vessel, to be constructed with funds planned for FY 1966, will be ice strengthened and complete- ly equipped for oceanographic research in arctic and subarctic waters. Bureau of Commercial Fisheries: $1,700,000 BCF will build a replacement for an exploratory fishing and oceanographic research vessel used in the tropical Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico. Funds are also being requested to equip a new ship (whose construction was funded in FY 1964) for high-sea salmon investigations and related oceanographic studies in the Bering Sea and the North Pacific. National Science Foundation: $1,500,000 NSF must be responsive to scientific proposals received; its program, therefore, is not as firm as those of other agencies. NSF expects to provide about $1.5 Million for ships, for university and other private laboratories. It is estimated that this will include one small vessel for general oceanog- raphic research. Navy: $9,100,000 Navy is requesting two ships to support the aims of the National Oceanographic Program. A 1,320 ton survey ship will be built to work with the larger vessels or carry out independent surveys and to assist in research projects in support of military requirements. This ship will replace the USS REQUISITE, a 23 year old converted mine sweeper, which is being decommissioned in early calendar year 1964. One of the Navy’s 1,350 ton oceanographic re- search ships will also be built for assignment to a private research institution, for use on research projects supporting Navy needs. ‘Three of the AGOR Class oceanographic research ships are now used by the Navy and by research institutions. The new AGOR will incorporate improvements gained in experience from the preceding three. Since none of these ships is in the FY 1964 shipbuilding pro- gram, the Navy is using this period to update the design and firm-up an improved “second genera- tion” of the class. This will be accomplished by utilizing the results of a complete canvass of both current and anticipated AGOR-users in order to ascertain experience and requirements data. B. Instrumentation: $9,110,000 Oceanographic instrumentation remains a criti- cal factor in improving quality and increasing quantity of oceanographic data. Replacement of slow, manual handling methods for data collection; and the development of new, automatic, and rapid collection and computing methods is most promis- ing. Present instrument development is directed toward improving the accuracy, sensitivity, dura- 606 bility, and versatility of existing instruments, de- veloping new instruments where existing gear is inadequate, and the use of automatic measurement, recording, analysis, and computation wherever pos- sible and practical. Plans for FY 1965, by agency, are as follows:* Bureau of Commercial Fisheries: $150,000 The Bureau is developing biological sampling and measuring devices applicable to fishery science, such as semiautomatic fish scale readers to deter- mine the race and age of North Pacific salmon, New England haddock, and South Atlantic and Gulf Coast menhaden. This instrument will im- prove accuracy and objectivity, standardize proce- dures, and reduce costs of scale reading. Another device under development is a towed vehicle which will follow and record a given parameter, such as temperature or salinity, while carrying a sampling device or another sensor. A high-speed plankton sampler which can be towed for long periods of time is also under development. Geological Survey: $150,000 The USGS is developing and testing instrument systems for: (a) Automatic collection of samples and continuous recording of information concern- ing the physical and chemical properties of water in streams, estuaries, and bays; (b) Mapping rela- tive bulk densities, radioactivity, and other prop- erties of recent ocean sediments; (c) Laboratory analyses of textural, mineralogic, and chemical characteristics of ocean sediments; (d) Collection of bottom samples from the ocean floor in coopera- tion with Coast and Geodetic Survey and other offices; and (e) Procurement of geophysical data pertinent to geological structures beneath the ocean floor. Bureau of Mines: $48,000 The USBM is continuing its studies of equip- ment for the successful sampling, evaluation, and economical recovery of mineral resources from in and on the ocean floor. All aspects will be con- sidered. Coast Guard: $1,218,000 The CG will continue the outfitting of its ocean- station vessels with oceanographic winches, labora- tories, and basic instruments for the collection of time series data. New winches and laboratories will be installed on three WIND Class icebreakers. * Additional funding for instrumentation is included under research categories, 36 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Coast and Geodetic Survey: $850,000 C&GS is acquiring modern oceanographic, hydro- graphic, and tide instrumentation, including signal processing and automated recording equipment to replace obsolete and cumbersome devices and to increase the automation of shipboard processing operations. A buoy system will be developed for estuarine and Continental Shelf studies. Deep-sea tsunami sensors will supplement the shore-based sensors and will provide basic physical data for studies of tsunami wave theory. The deep-sea sensors may also provide an early warning capa- bility to the existing network. In support of the Survey’s study of basic tidal theory, the develop- ment of a special tide gage for offshore use to determine tidal characteristics at sea will be con- tinued. Development of the automated current measuring system, to replace the present system, will be completed. Office of Naval Research: $740,000 The ONR is sponsoring development of large oceanographic and meteorological buoys. Two pro- totype deep-sea buoys with high-speed telemeter- ing capabilities for long-range communications will be developed during FY 1965. This continuation of a 2-year buoy-development program includes construction of two discus-shaped hulls, 40 feet in diameter, tests of electrical power supplies and radio communication over distances as great as 2,500 miles, investigations of mooring techniques, de- velopment of sensors, and engineering of telemeter- ing and recording systems for buoys and shore com- mand stations. Naval Oceanographic Office: $5,909,000 The NavOceano will continue to expand its test and evaluation capabilities and pursue the devel- opment of oceanographic recording systems from sensor to computer. The present program for test- ing, calibrating, and evaluating of both standard and newly developed instruments will be accel- erated. The Shipboard Survey System now under development will be carried to the field testing phase. This system which consists of an under- water subsystem, a hoist subsystem, and a data handling subsystem, will be the first truly inte- grated shipboard survey system with seismic, mag- netic, gravity, and bathymetric, as well as oceano- graphic recording capabilities. Data will be read out in a format for direct use by the National Oceanographic Data Center, In FY 1965 the Office plans to develop more advanced sensors, capable NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 of much greater accuracy, sensitivity, and reliabil- ity for this and other systems. Efforts toward de- velopment of standard synoptic instrumentation will be increased. This will include continued work with ONR in buoy systems, i.e., development of anchoring and moving techniques for both sub- merged and surface models and appropriate in- strument packages for them. Public Health Service: $45,000 PHS is planning to modify present fresh-water instruments for use in estuarine and near-shore waters. In the first stages of this program, efforts are being largely directed towards development of instruments for automatic measurements of water quality. In addition, automatic recording meters will be utilized in estuarine waters. C. Facilities: $8,420,000 Construction and improvement of shore facili- ties in FY 1965 will continue at about the same funding level as in FY 1964. About 65 per cent of this effort will enlarge the research and training capacity of private institutions. The remainder will be used for the modernization of existing Federal laboratories and for the financing of a limited pro- gram of new Federal construction. Outlines of programs by agency follow. Coast and Geodetic Survey: $360,000 The C&GS has scheduled development of the Norfolk Ship Base in FY 1965 as outlined in Phase V of its master plan. This stage will complete the conversion of the base to a modern facility for ship support and data processing. The channel is to be dredged and the administrative office constructed. Office of Naval Research: $2,000,000 The ONR is sponsoring the construction of dock- ing facilities at the Narragansett Marine Laboratory of the University of Rhode Island to expand the present pier to accommodate the new 180 foot research vessel. Increased pier space is also being provided for the Woods Hole Oceanographic Insti- tution where present space is inadequate. Bureau of Commercial Fisheries: $2,500,000 The BCF proposes to build a $1.5 million labor- atory at Miami, Florida, which will serve as head- quarters for research in the tropical Atlantic. Ex- tensive work in exploratory fishing, oceanography, and biology will be needed to develop the food resources of this area, making the establishment of the laboratory basic to a successful program. A new 37 607 $1 million biological laboratory is planned for Mil- ford, Connecticut, to replace the present one which is old and inadequate. It will be concerned with specialized large-scale studies on the artificial cul- ture of shellfish and on the control of shellfish predators. Geological Survey: $30,000 The USGS is establishing a marine research facil- ity in the San Francisco Bay Area of California. This installation will serve as a base for marine geological, geophysical, and hydrological studies of the Pacific Ocean floor. Coast Guard: $30,000 The CG is continuing structural additions to two light towers now under construction to permit oceanographic measurements to be made. Surveys from CG light towers will be made in conjunction with the Fish and Wildlife Service, CkGS, Weather Bureau, Corps of Engineers, and private research laboratories. National Science Foundation: $3,500,000 (Estimate) NSF will invest about $3.5 million in shore facil- ities at universities and other nongovernment re- search institutions. Precisely what facilities will be built and for whom, will be decided after pro- posals are received and evaluated by NSF. D. Manpower and Training: ($1.6 Million)* Achievement of the long range goal in oceanog- raphy depends critically on (a) the training in our universities of an adequate number of high caliber scientists to direct and carry out a research pro- gram which is certain to become technically and scientifically more complex, and (b) the training of technicians capable of carrying out much of the observational and laboratory program and of man- ning the needed expansion of ocean engineering. Sources of Trained Oceanographers A 1962 study by the ICO reported that 35 insti- tutions offer courses in the “marine sciences,’’ 29 institutions offer graduate courses, and graduate degrees are granted by 17 institutions. A study con- ducted by the Office of Education, summarized in the following table, shows that between 1959 and * This is included in the tabulations of research budgets. The figures reported here include federal support of fellow- ships and employee training programs in oceanography, but do not include stipends paid to student research assistants (which are also included under the appropriate research categories) . 608 1962 the number of undergraduate and graduate degrees granted in oceanography failed to increase significantly. At the same time, graduate enroll- ment did increase steadily and significantly, so that it is reasonable to expect a marked increase in graduate degrees within the next few years. University enrollment and degree statistics rep- resent only in part the sources of oceanographers. According to the National Register, scientists re- porting first specialties in oceanography hold their highest degrees in that subject. Other fields from which oceanographers come in significant numbers are: Biology: 21%; Geology: 20%; Engineering: 14%; Physics: 7%. ADVANCED DEGREE ENROLLMENTS AND DEGREES GRANTED* IN OCEANOGRAPHY BY U.S. UNIVERSITIES 1959-1962 Academic Years 1959 1960 1961 1962 Advanced degree enrollments n.a. 111 159 191 Full-time na. 92 105 126 Part-time mas IS) BOD Degrees Hp Bil BD BO Bachelors 2 6 6 2 Masters 15 Oy Mes Zz Doctorates 10 6 Be 2 These fields provide a large and diversified pool from which oceanographers will continue to be re- cruited. However, competition from the parent fields and from other developing science programs is severe, so that it is doubtful that manpower ade- quate for the expanded program of the Ten Year Plan can be recruited without special efforts. The Need for Engineers and Technicians Attainment of the goals of the Long Range Plan and profitable exploitation of the sea requires that the field of ocean engineering be expanded and strengthened. Instruments must be designed and built to withstand the adverse environment of the * Source: Office of Education—From Office of Education earned degree study, which defines oceanography as a physical science. Degrees in closely related fields of marine biology, geology, geochemistry, etc., not included. 38 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 sea, new types of structures and vehicles must be built, and man must learn to work effectively with- in the sea. Capable engineers and technicians who have first-hand acquaintance with the sea and its special difficulties are scarce, and this lack of ayail- able manpower inhibits industry from entering a field in which it should play a large role. It be- comes the responsibility of the federal government, therefore, to encourage industry to turn its atten- tion to ocean engineering and to stimulate and sup- port the training of technicians for the wide vari- ety of skilled tasks which are needed. Agency Support of Education and Training Fellowships are available to qualified graduate students of oceanography in competition with other fields through the broad programs of the National Science Foundation, the Public Health Service, and the Office of Education (National Defense Educa- tion Act). The Bureau of Commercial Fisheries supports fellowships in oceanography through grants for this purpose to selected universities. Roughly one-third of the graduate student popu- lation in oceanography is supported by fellowships- and the total federal expenditure for this purpose is estimated for FY 1965 as $0.4 million or 25% of the total manpower funds in oceanography. Research grants and contracts provide financial support for about half the graduate students. These students normally devote 20 hours per week to re- search under the supervision of a faculty member; this not only provides them with an income, but in most cases the research experience which they gain is a most important part of their training. The National Science Foundation, Office of Naval Re- search, Navy Oceanographic Office, Bureau of Ships, Bureau of Naval Weapons, Atomic Energy Commission, Public Health Service, and the Smith- sonian provide contract and grant support of this sort. Stipends paid to graduate students for re- search is included under the appropriate research budget. Substantial employee training programs in oceanography are conducted by the Navy (Naval Academy and Post-graduate School), Coast and Geodetic Survey, and the Coast Guard. Other agen- cies provide limited support for employee training. An estimated $1.2 million or 75%, of the total manpower funds will be allocated to all employee training programs in FY 1965. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 609 Chapter III NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PLAN BUDGET Based on a 1958 study of the potential of ocean- ography to contribute to the national welfare by the National Academy of Sciences, the Executive Branch and the Congress, concerted steps were taken to elevate this field from its comparatively primitive state of resources and activity to one in healthier balance with science and technology as a whole and more responsive to national needs. The Federal oceanographic budget has grown from a FY 1959 level of $32 million to $55 million in FY 1960 and to $62 million in FY 1961, with a budget supplement in FY 1962 totaling $105 mil- lion. Growth to $124 million in FY 1963 completely leveled off in FY 1964 as a result of Congressional action upon the President’s Budget. Although the FY 1965 budget has been kept to a minimum consistent with requisites, there is, nevertheless, some proposed growth. The research, instrumentation, and facilities components which form the cutting edge for scientific accomplish- ments will grow from $68.0 million in FY 1964 to $86.7 million, thus preserving the momentum al- ready established. The program will thus continue progress toward goals set forth by the late President Kennedy in his message to the Congress in 1961 and the more detailed projection of the recently published long range Federal plan in oceanography. Ship construction, however, will be slowed. A number of major program components have been previously identified as deserving further study and emphasis: deep sea research, and vehicles requisite for its accomplishment; a more vigorous study of air/sea interaction; and a detailed ration- ale for future survey operations. Such studies are now in progress, and will be elaborated upon in subsequent reports, explaining the basis for those budget elements in the FY 1965 budget and setting the stage for extension of this activity in future years. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PLAN BUDGET (Thousands) Actual FY 1963 A. BY AGENCIES Defense $ 55,475 Commerce 23,645 Interior 16,104 National Science Foundation 19,700 Atomic Energy Commission 3,516 Health, Education and Welfare 4,108 Treasury 511 Smithsonian Institution 607 $123,666 B. BY FUNCTIONAL AREAS Research $ 46,410 Instrumentation 6,658 Ships 37,250 Surveys 18,036 TIOE 5,802 Facilities 8,875 Data Center 635 $123,666 35-377 O—64——_40 Estimated FY 1964 President’s Budget FY 1965 39 $ 54,631 $ 66,619 23,752 20,486 16,509 19,652 20,200 20,600 4,167 4,730 2,855 3,280 1,152 1,822 605 881 $123,871 $138,070 $ 58,722 $ 69,143 6,386 9,110 27,387 21,350 21,916 25,014 5,582 3,979 2,937 8,420 941 1,054 $123,871 $138,070 610 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Cc. INDIVIDUAL AGENCY BUDGETS AGENCY—FUNCTION Actual FY 1963 Estimated FY 1964 40 President's Budget FY 1965 DEFENSE—TOTAL $ 55,475 $ 54,631 $ 66,619 Navy—Total 54,850 53,557 65,506 Research 19,900 26,426 32,278 Instrumentation 5,500 4,455 6,649 Ship Construction 18,200 8,200 9,100 Surveys 9,600 12,944 14,704 IIOE 1,300 803 250 Facilities = 233 2,000 Data Center 350 496 525 Army—Total 625 1,074 1,113 Research 625 1,074 1,113 COMMERCE—-TOTAL $ 23,645 $ 23,752 $ 20,486 Coast & Geodetic Survey—Total 23,412 23,519 20,203 Research 394 839 650 Instrumentation 768, 973 850 Ship Construction 14,400 13,000 9,000 Surveys 7,505 8,109 9,101 IIOE _ 125 75 Facilities 265 332 360 Data Center 80 141 167 Weather Bureau—Total 183 183 233 Research 173 165 208 Data Center 10 18 25 Maritime Administration— Total 50 50 50 Research 50 50 50 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 611 C. INDIVIDUAL AGENCY BUDGETS (Cont'd.) AGENCY—FUNCTION Actual FY 1963 Estimated FY 1964 President’s Budget FY 1965 INTERIOR—TOTAL $ 16,104 $ 16,509 $ 19,652 Bureau of Commercial Fisheries—Total 15,320 15,494 18,210 Research 9,747 11,757 13,499 Instrumentation 70 120 150 Ship Construction 2,650 3,107 1,700 Surveys 20 20 40 IIOE 102 154 154 Facilities 2,651 195 2,500 Data Center 80 141 167 Geological Survey—Total 496 498 998 Research 476 474 778 Instrumentation 20 24 150 Surveys _ — 20 Facilities — - 30 Data Center — _ 20 Bureau of Sports Fisheries & Wildlife—Total 238 464 262 Research 238 257 262 Facilities _ 127 — Ship Construction — 80 — Bureau of Mines—Total 50 53 182 Research 50 53 104 Instrumentation — _ 48 Ship Construction _ = — Surveys = — 30 Data Center = = at NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION—TOTAL $ 19,700 $ 20,200 $ 20,600 Research 9,200 10,600 12,000 Ship Construction 2,000 3,000 1,500 IIOE 4,400 4,500 3,500 Facilities 4,000 2,000 3,500 Data Center 100 100 100 41 612 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 C. INDIVIDUAL AGENCY BUDGETS (Cont'd.) AGENCY—FUNCTION Actual FY 1963 Estimated FY 1964 President’s Budget FY 1965 ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION—TOTAL $ 3,516 $ 4,167 $ 4,730 Research 3,501 4,142 4,705 Data Center 15 25 25 HEALTH, EDUCATION & WELFARE—TOTAL $ 4,108 $ 2,855 $ 3,280 Public Health Service—Total 4,058 2,805 3,230 Research 1,558 2,230 2,505 Instrumentation _ 45 45 Surveys 700 530 680 Facilities 1,800 — — Office of Education—Total 50 50 50 Research 50 50 50 TREASURY—TOTAL fy lil $ 1,152 $ 1,822 Coast Guard—Total $ 511 $ 1,152 $ 1,822 Research — — 60 Instrumentation 300 769 1,218 Ship Construction = = 50 Surveys 211 313 439 Facilities — 50 30 Data Center _ 20 25 SMITHSONIAN—TOTAL $ 607 $ 605 $ ©6881 Research 448 605 881 Facilities 159 — — 49 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 613 APPENDIX ICO OCEANOGRAPHIC SURVEY/RESEARCH SHIPS 43 614 Name TANNER MAURY TOWHEE SHELDRAKE SERRANO SAN PABLO REHOBOTH LITTLEHALES ARCHERFISH BOWDITCH DUTTON MICHELSON CONRAD GILLISS DAVIS SANDS LYNCH KELLAR AGOR-9 AGOR-10 AGS-26 AGS-27 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Type Large AGS Large Large Large Large Medium AGS Medium Small AGS Medium AGS Large AGS Large Large AGOR AGOR AGOR AGOR AGOR Small AGOR AGOR Medium AGS Medium AGS AGS AGS-28 UNITED STATES NAVY Source ex-AKA ex-AKA ex-AMS ex-AMS ex-ATF ex-AVP ex-AVP ex-YF ex-SS ex-Cargo ex-Cargo ex-Cargo new const. new const. new const. new const. new const. new const. new const. new const. new const. new const. Built 1944 1943 1941 1943 1947 1942 1942 1945 © 1943 1944 1944 1944 1963 1963 1963 1964 1964 1964 1965 1965 1965 1966 Proposed FY 1965 Program AGOR Small AGS new const. new const. 1967 1967 44 Use Coastal surveys, tender Coastal surveys, tender Coastal & nearshore surveys Coastal & nearshore surveys Coastal & nearshore surveys Mid-Ocean surveys Mid-Ocean surveys Harbor surveys Ocean surveys Ocean surveys Ocean surveys Ocean surveys Ocean research (Lamont) Ocean research (Navy) Ocean research (Navy) Ocean research (Navy) Ocean research (Navy) Coastal & nearshore surveys Ocean research (Scripps) Cost Millions $ 4.5 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 44 4.4 Ocean research (Univ. of Washington) Ath Ocean surveys Ocean surveys Ocean research (Texas A&M) Coastal & offshore surveys 9.4 8.2 4.5 46 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 UNITED STATES NAVY (cont'd) 615 NAME LOA DRAFT BEAM DISPL COMPLEMENT SOURCE .AGE MISSION CREW Sc TANNER CLASS 426 17 53 6500 330 8 AKA 1944 Precise coastal surveys. Serve as TANNER operating tender providing sup- MAURY 1943 port for smaller ships, boats, and shore parties. Equipped with helicopters. Chart production capability and electronic posi- tioning equipment. SAN PABLO CLASS 300 13 41 2600 174 8 AVP 1942 Deep-water oceanographic and SAN PABLO hydrographic data. Basic ships REHOBOTH for collection of deep-ocean en- vironmental data for pro- and anti-submarine warfare. Con- duct the “ocean-wide survey” to meet the VCS and national re- quirements for a widespread knowledge of the oceans. BOWDITCH 455 24 62 13,000 80 15 CARGO 1944 Deep ocean surveys for special BOWDITCH fleet requirements. DUTTON MICHELSON REQUISITE CLASS 221 11 32 1250 82 2 AMS 1941 Nearshore, shallow and medium TOWHEE depth hydrographic and oceano- SHELDRAKE graphic work, either for charter SERRANO 195 15 39 1235 82 2 ATF 1943 surveys or for special military Projects such as mining and mines countermeasures work. Mid-deep equipment, test. and evaluation by shipborne and bottomed sonar arrays. LITTLEHALES 136 11 31 600 19 1 YTB 1945 Shallow water oceanography for military requirements. ARCHERFISH 311 17 2200 55 4 SS 1943 Project SEASCAN GILLISS CLASS 209 14 41 1320 26 15 NEW 1963 Basic and applied oceanography. (AGOR) Acoustic test of environmental GILLISS effects on instruments. CONRAD DAVIS SPECIAL FEATURES: SANDS 1964 Lab and office space, LYNCH 1964 acoustic silencing, AGOR 1965 oceanographic winch, AGOR 1965 deep anchoring, bow propellor, antiroll tanks, van storage. KELLAR CLASS (Small AGS) 209 14 41 1320 26 15 NEW 1964 Same as REQUISITE Class. 45 616 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 U.S. COAST AND GEODETIC SURVEY NAME LOA DRAFT BEAM DISPL COMPLEMENT SOURCE AGE MISSION CREW Sc Ocean Survey Ships OSS-31 PIONEER 312 14 41 2600 103 15 1943 Complex Oceanographic capability OSS-32 SURVEYOR 292 16 46 3150 90 21 1960 Complex Oceanographic capability OSS-01 OCEANOGRAPHER 303 18 52 3805 85 20 1964 Complex Oceanographic capability OSS-02 DISCOVERER 303 18 52 3805 85 20 1964 Complex Oceanographic capability OSS-28 EXPLORER 220 16 38 1900 79 21 1940 Complex Oceanographic capability OSS-30 PATHFINDER 229 16 39 2000 79 20 1942 Complex Oceanographic capability Medium Survey Ships M-SS-20 FAIRWEATHER 220 13 42 1615 70 12 1964 Hydrography & limited oceanography MSS-21 RANIER 220 13 42 1615 70 12 1965 Hydrography & limited oceanography MSS-19 HYDROGRAPHER 164 14 32 1160 48 10 1930 Hydrography & limited oceanography MSS- Not named 230 13 42 1630 70 12 1966 Hydrography & limited oceanography Coastal Survey Ships CSS-28 PEIRCE 163 10 33 760 30 6 1963 Hydrography & limited oceanography CSS-29 Whiting 163 10 33 760 30 6 1963 Hydrography & limited oceanography CSS-26 BOWIE 136 8 24 267 24 4 1940 Hydrography & limited oceanography CSS-27 HODGSON 136 8 24 267 24 4 1943 Hydrography & limited oceanography CSS-30 Not named 169 10 36 770 30 6 1965 Hydrography & limited oceanography CSS-31 Not named 169 10 36 770 30 6 1965 Hydrography & limited oceanography Auxiliary Survey Vessels ASV-80 PATTON 88 8 2 eer 4: 12 3 1941 Hydrography & limited oceanography ASV-79 LESTER JONES 88 8 21 157 12 3 1940 Hydrography & limited oceanography ASV-89 MARMER 101 10 22 270 14 3 1932 Hydrography & limited oceanography ASV- Not named 85 150 - = 1965 Wire drag boats for harbor and ASV- Not named 85 150 = a 1965 waterway obstruction surveys Medium AGS (SCB-226) 280 15 48 2550 41 34 NEW 1965 226 1966 Same as SAN PABLO Class Large AGS (SCB-193) 380 16 53 4100 300 8 NEW Same as TANNER Class PROPOSED FY 1965 PROGRAM AGOR NEW _ 1967 Small AGS NEW 1967 Ocean Survey Ship (modified) Complex oceanographic capability. (Now OSS- Not named 2800 in preliminary design stage.) (approx.) 46 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 U. S. COAST GUARD 617 SHIPS WITH OCEANOGRAPHIC CAPABILITY—EXISTING (FY-64) AND PLANNED (FY-65) PROGRAMS Oceanographic Vessel (WAGO) International Ice Pa- trol, Arctic and Sub- Arctic Surveys. CGS EVERGREEN LOA 180’ DRAFT 13’ BEAM 37’ DISP 1025 CREW 48 SC 6 AGE 1943 SOURCE-Convy. buoy tender Icebreakers Ocean Station Vessels (Weather Ships) (WAGB) ¥ High endurance cutters outfitted for surface and Polar resupply, ice- upper air meteorological observations on six U.S. breaking and ocea- Ocean Stations. These ships are being equipped nography. with oceanographic laboratories and winches for CGC NORTHWIND time-series oceanographic observations. CGC EASTWIND - CGC WESTWIND ee oy 327-ft Class BEAM 63° WEG DISP 6500 | INGHAM CREW 234 | CAMPBELL SC 18 | SPENCER AGE 1944 | TANEY In 1965 a new vessel will be designed to replace EVER- GREEN. New ship to be approximately 200-ft long @ 1500 tons. To have ice- breaking capability. FY-64 311-ft Class 255-ft Class (WAVP) (WPG) CASCO MENDOTA YAKUTAT HUMBOLDT | COOK INLET CASTLE ROCK BARATARIA BERING STRAIT 350-ft Class (New Construction) one ship in FY-64 FY 65 PROGRAM In 1965 new and] BIBB larger laboratories} DUANE will be installed on icebreakers. New oce- anographic winches to be provided. HALF MOON ESCANABA ABSECON OWASCO MACKINAC WINNEBAGO ROCKAWAY CHAUTAUGUA CHINCO- MINNETONKA TEAGUE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION NAME LOA DRAFT BEAM DISPL COMPLEMENT SOURCE AGE MISSION ELTANIN 266 20 51 3800 32 1957 Oceanographic research ANTON BRUUN 243 1700 15 1963 Oceanographic research ATLANTIS II PILLSBURY ALAMINOS YAQUINA Not named CATAMARAN TE VEGA INLAND SEAS (Not named) Listed with WHOI Listed with U. of Miami Listed with Texas A & M To be delivered to Oregon State U. To be delivered to Duke U. To be delivered to Johns Hopkins U. Listed with Stanford U. Listed with U. of Michigan To be delivered to U. California, Scripps 47 Oceanographic research Oceanographic research Oceanographic research CONVERSION 1964 Oceanographic research NEW 1964 Oceanographic research NEW 1964 Oceanographic research Oceanographic research Oceanographic research NEW 1964 Oceanographic research 618 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 BUREAU OF COMMERCIAL FISHERIES NAME LOA DRAFT BEAM DISPL COMPLEMENT SOURCE CONSTRUCTION MISSION CREW Sc DATE ALBATROSS IV CLASS ALBATROSS IV 187 14 = 1000 «15 12 1962 CHARLES H. GILBERT 123 = — $83 11 5 1952 TOWNSEND CROMWELL 158 = =- 600 8 1963 GEORGE B. KELEZ 167 - = OO is 6 1944 BLACK DOUGLAS 152 14 = 87111 5 1938 Ocean research DELAWARE 147 15 = 518 13 4 1950 (bio-chemistry, GERONIMO 143 15 = 760 15 12 1945 meteorology, UNDAUNTED 143 15 = 760 15 12 1945 and fisheries) . DELAWARE (replacement) 150 = = 650 — = NEW 1964 DAVID STARR JORDAN 171 = - 14, 1 = = NEW 1964 (Not named) 200 14 200 a — NEW 1965 GEORGE M. BOWERS CLASS GEORGE M. BOWERS 74 8 - 91 8 2 1956 SILVER BAY 96 = — 163 = 4 1956 MURRE II 86 - - 250 5 1943 CHINOOK 35 - = Sie 2 1938 JOHN N. COBB 93 10 - 250 «(ill 4 1950 COMMANDO 65 _ - 69 — 5 1945 Ocean research OREGON 100 10 = 219 11 3 1946 (bio-chemistry, KINGFISH 43 4 = HD 4 1954 meteorology, PHALAROPE II 40 — =i 10 _ 2 1932 and fisheries) . RORQUAL 65 6 - 50 3 4 1941 SHANG WHEELER 50 5 — 25 4 4 1950 ASOSA 48 5 = 19 3 3 1941 LOUISE 39 3 - QB 3 1948 Proposed FY 1965 Program OREGON replacement 150 600 1966 Ocean research 48 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 PRIVATE INSTITUTIONS 619 NAME LOA DRAFT BEAM DISPL COMPLEMENT CREW sc SOURCE AGE MISSION BROWN BEAR HOH AGOR (not named) AGASSIZ ARGO BAIRD HORIZON OCONOSTOTA PAOLINA-T H. M. SMITH AGOR (not named) ACONA ALAMINOS GERDA JOHN ELLIOTT PILLSBURY USNS JOSIAH GIBBS CONRAD VEMA TRIDENT ATLANTIS I ATLANTIS II CHAIN CRAWFORD GOSNOLD INLAND SEAS 65 180 213 143, 180 102 80 128 132 80 180 75 177 300 200 180 142 210 213 125 99 27 750 11 a oh e UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON 21 8 Listed with Navy research ships SCRIPPS INSTITUTION OF OCEANOGRAPHY 15 14 10 14 10 — 825° — 40 20/9" — 33 997 18 — 825) — = 2066 — 22 170 9 29 561 12 14 24 ARS 15 TUG 14 4 5 10 YP Listed with Navy research ships 31 300 12 10 NEW OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY 22 154 6 8 TRAWLER TEXAS A & M COLLEGE ae Ch) es 14 UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI - 135 — - 935 — 5 20 HUDSON LABORATORY 42 2800 48 24 AVP LAMONT GEOLOGICAL OBSERVATORY 17 Listed with Navy research ships 17 AUX. SCHOONER 33 734 19 NARRAGANSETT MARINE LABORATORY 19 = 856 = 28 500 17 = 2300 — 41 2100 29 24 322 = 304 — 13 WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION 9 KETCH 25 23 ARS 8 CGCUTTER 7 UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN 49 1934 1943 1944 1944 1944 1944 1944 1944 1945 1965 1961 1948 1943 1944 1923 1931 1962 1944 1927 1948 Oceanographic research and student training. Oceanographic research (biology, chemistry, meteorology, fisheries, seismic instrument development, and student training.) Oceanographic research Oceanographic research Oceanographic research Oceanographic research (acoustics, chemistry, and instrument development) . Oceanographic research and student training. Oceanographic research (acoustics, plankton, magnetics, and bottom photography) . Oceanographic research (bathymetry, bottom biology, chemistry, instrument development, and student training) . 620 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 PRIVATE INSTITUTIONS (cont'd) NAME LOA DRAFT BEAM DISPL COMPLEMENT SOURCE AGE CREW Sc STANFORD UNIVERSITY TE VEGA 135 17 28 270 «15 15 CONV. 1963 NEW YORK UNIVERSITY KYMA 65 = 17 95 = = 1952 DUKE UNIVERSITY (Not named) 117 11 28 295 mel) 15 NEW 1964 50 MISSION NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 621 THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON March 19, 1964 Dear Mr. President: (Dear Mr. Speaker: ) Recognizing the continued interest by the Congress in advancing this Nation's program in oceanography, I am pleased to forward advance copies of two publications of the Federal Council for S:ience and Technology that set forth Government-wide plans and budget details. These reports, entitled "National Oceanographic Program, Fiscal Year 1965, Parts I and II,“ contain an account of oceanic research to meet national goals, in keeping with the long range considerations previously submitted to the Congress. Informa- tion is also included concerning proposed funding for research, surveys, new ship and laboratory construction, and :oncerning program planning and coordination by the Council's Interagency Committee on Oceanography (ICO), to minimize unwitting duplica- tion and program gaps. The proposed Federal budget in Bass ge aa is $138 million. This is 11% more than Fiscal Year 1964 appropriations, which in turn @qualled those for Fiscal Year 1963. This proposed growth is an absolute minimum if the country is to maintain the momentum necessary to achieve those objectives in oceanic research which have been previously enunciated by both President Kennedy and the Congress to enhance our military defense; to develop marine mineral and fisheries resources to control pollution; to predict more accurately storms and tides that endanger life and property; to assist state, national and inter- national bodies in wise legislation and regulation of commerce on the sea; and to extend scientific knowledge generally. I especially should like to cali attention to the Government- wide character of this program. Statutory responsibility for the conduct of related sectors are vested in a number of © “separate agencies. Special measures are thus being continued by the Office of Science and Technology and the Federal Council for Science and Technology, with the assistance of the ICO, to achieve effective interagency planning end coordination. Sincerely yours, {sf Lyndon B. Johnson Honorable Carl Hayden President pro Tempore of the Senate Washington, D. C. Honorable John W. McCormack Speaker of the House of Representatives Washington, D. C. wei ‘SoTHW RET A TULLE HAW fo ool emir, th ceed | soba Jat saod! bas oy aaa ee ¢ [axebe BaaogG . fo f W ,a8¢ ) See ae a iy Beers } any hie Coli ®, ; daworm Deaoqot4 atc? .fOQL yeeY Jace 102) eaone ame Ey ee! hfs 3 i i b- od asoauose: petreial? bra Lax er i “ c 2 Peng vs wr ¢ i at ‘eae ‘ a an mo fe J Bens ixhe Tom hoe 3 ele : tie +g G qa “otot bua Latolfan yeseve valehe oo. py saqorg ripe orkt ® 504 i so nba 4 Lit eS 2 | i St ae oP. te ee Me ~ forensy apbalwod! otittaeioe bracxs se: se8 GR ait | yy. eT gies F gts , “i i & £5 3 158 pyle fev etwatat Hts IO sy oa sev tistnere ges TO | oytyeakt oxtd "te" A > uths sara af - | sf Wan ea ike APPENDIX 8 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE NATIONAL OCHANOGRAPHIC DATA CENTER—FISCAL YEAR 1962, SUBMITTED BY MR. HAROLD W. DUBACH, DEPUTY, NODC 623 OF e + : ] a “ r j — ia =~ SEALE e torn) fe eee Loop Soe prt ttn hi ph giana mt nthe ions ma Ne hei ete Sry nt neers Ah wrrchh- messes pees rita nea ep Vpn 8 RRA f HUTAMDPOMAUOO TAMOTTAK GUT tO TROGHeE im Yes GarriMave wer faay TaoeiT— me Des ca A nee OO seyret bemnhee tae som epee a A ele he tre a ARPA males ered Sidhu webatehemeanticsadenmensdacamentreaer 4 Senne apiacaspeiuetiandereei atta ee enn nn NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC DATA CENTER ANNUAL REPORT OF THE NODC (JULY 1961—JUNE 1962) 625 35-377 O—64——41 626 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC DATA CENTER (July 1961 through June 1962) On January 16, 1962 the National Oceanographic Data Center completed its first full year of operation and on June 30, 1962 finished its first full Fiscal Year. Some of the work in Fiscal Year 1962 was a continuation of the task begun in 1961 of completing the organization of the NODC. In addition to this task the NODC has made a number of significant accomplishments during this period. In the area of physical-chemical data, the computational capability of the NODC in the pro- cessing of oceanographic station data was speeded up by a factor of 25 to 1 by conversion to the new 1401-7070 computer system. A new format for listing oceanographic station data which eliminates the need for separate wiring boards was developed. Both publication listings and regular listings now can be run by using the same wiring board. During Fiscal Year 1962 the NODC staff developed a standard form for recording physical- chemical data. This form was designed to incorporate most of the suggestions of the oceanographic community, so that it would adequately serve consumer needs. This form has been adopted by the International Indian Ocean Expedition, and will be especially printed for participants in that expedi- tion. The first Working Group of the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission has recom- mended to the Commission that this same form be used by participants in the forthcoming International Cooperative Investigations of the Tropical Atlantic Ocean. A new punch card format for physical-chemical data was also developed by the NODC staff. The format was developed concurrently with the recording form to eliminate coding operations when data are submitted on the NODC form. A provisional bathythermograph log was printed and dis- tributed. After a period of testing by components of the U.S. Navy Fleet the log is currently under- going revision. The log is also currently used by other nations. Work has begun on the development of a BT punch card to digitize both data in the NODC archives and future BT data. This card is being developed concurrently with the BT log and in concert with the oceanographic community. In the area of publications the NODC released, in December 1961, the joint IGY WDC-A- NODC publication Oceanographic Vessels of the World. This publication has stimulated such great interest that a supplement is currently in work. The first publication in the catalog series, Reference Sources for Oceanographic Station Data, was also released in FY-62. By the end of FY-62 the first two publications in the Manual Series, M-1, Oceanographic Conversion Tables for Use by the Interna- tional Indian Ocean Expedition, and M-2, Processing Physical and Chemical Data from Oceanographic Stations, were in press and will be released early in FY-63. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 627 During FY-62 NODC has published a monthly NEWSLETTER, consisting of approximately 8 pages and containing information on activities of NODC and items of interest to the entire scientific community. The NODC has provided back-up information for articles appearing in magazines and journals; namely, Rockets and Missiles magazine, the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, the Mariners Weather Log, and the U. S. Naval Institute Proceedings. The NODC also prepared an article which appeared in the March issue of Transactions of the American Geophysical Union. Papers on the work of the NODC were presented at numerous meetings of scientific and related societies such as, the Joint Government-Industry Symposium on Oceanographic Instrumenta- tion, the American Society of Computer Machinery, the Research Society of America, and the Special Libraries Association. In the field of research and investigations the NODC has been working on the development of a geological-geophysical data holding-recall system and presented its findings to the Ad Hoc Com- mittee on Geology and Geophysics in June 1962. A similar program for biological data is also under development. An analysis of bathythermograph data has also been begun to evaluate the data in NODC archives and to evaluate incoming BT data. A new computer program was written to detect instabilities in physical-chemical data from oceanographic stations. This has considerably cut down premonitoring work necessary in quality control procedures. Work is progressing on reprogramming for the computation of sound velocity according to Wilson's method and test runs of this program have been made for special projects. In order that the NODC will truly represent an interagency concept, three additional agencies with an interest in oceanography have been invited to participate in the support of NODC. These agencies are the U. S. Coast Guard, The Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, and the U.S. Geological Survey. During FY-62 the Coast Guard and the Geological Survey responded favorably to this invitation and have agreed to support the NODC beginning in FY-64. The other agency had made no definite committment by the end of FY-62. 628 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 The sponsoring agencies and their representatives on the Interagency Advisory Board are: ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION Dr. Vincent Schultz BUREAU OF COMMERCIAL FISHERIES Mr. Howard Eckles COAST AND GEODETIC SURVEY Dr. Harris B. Stewart, Jr. NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION Dr. John Lyman NAVAL OCEANOGRAPHIC OFFICE Mr. Boyd E. Olson OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH Dr. Arthur E. Maxwell WEATHER BUREAU Mr. Robert Schloemer NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: Dr. Milner B. Schaefer Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission Dr. Donald Pritchard The Johns Hopkins University NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC DATA CENTER Dr. Woodrow C. Jacobs Director, ex officio Member of Board NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 629 POLICY DECISIONS BY THE NODC ADVISORY BOARD FOR FISCAL YEAR 1962 The following items, quoted or paraphrased from the NODC Advisory Board Minutes, represent the policy decisions made by the Board during FY-62. These are arranged by subject, not in chrono- logical order. BUDGET MATTERS The board established at the 18 January 1962 Meeting the following policy in regard to sub- mission of NODC budgets: ‘‘(1) Budgets will be submitted two years in advance; (2) the NODC will submit the preliminary budget to the Board on 1 September [of each calendar year]; (3) The Board and the NODC staff [will] devote the period from September to January to budget review; (4) at the first meeting in January of each year the Board will act on the budget for the Fiscal Year beginning 18 and 6 months in advance, respectively.” EXCHANGES At the Meeting of 18 January 1962 the board set the following policy, *‘. . . International exchanges other than those to which we are already authorized by the Board [are to] be handled under the IGY WDC-A &- B agreements.” REQUESTS FOR SERVICES At the Advisory Board meeting of 17 April 1962 two decisions were made on requests for services. 1. In order to expedite initiation of work requested by government contracting oceano- graphic institutions, a special allotment would be set up by the Office of Naval Research on which these institutions could draw. Authorization to begin work would be on verbal approval from ONR. 2. The NODC will volunteer the services of its personnel to assist in oceanographic surveys both at the national and international levels. WORLD DATA CENTER-A (OCEANOGRAPHY ) On 5 July 1961, the Board decided that ‘‘WDC-A [should] not be terminated but instead moved physically to NODC; a component should be set up within NODC to permit its continuation, but functions of WDC-A would be carried by NODC.” At the meeting of 14 August 1961 it was decided that a letter to the NODC be prepared by the National Academy of Sciences ‘‘authorizing NODC to assume responsibility of the WDC-A and to insure that it carries out all aspects of its job... The NODC accepted responsibility for the WDC-A on 8 March 1962. PUBLICATIONS At the meeting of 30 October 1961 the Board made two decisions on policies governing publications of the NODC. 1. “Review of publications by the Board prior to publication is not required but members of the Board in the Washington area would . . . do so if requested by the Director.”’ 2. Although NODC ‘‘publications have prices listed on them, [they] should be sent free of charge to contributing activities.”’ 630 SUMMARY OF FUNDS DATA IN: This is a fiscal summary of funds received and expended in Fiscal Year 1962 covering the normal operating costs required to process oceanographic data into existing standard holding- recall systems. RECEIPTS Supporting Agency Atomic Energy Commission $ 10,000 Bureau of Commercial Fisheries 80,000 Coast and Geodetic Survey 80,000 National Science Foundation 80,000 Navy 250,000 Weather Bureau 10,000 Total Agency Support $510,000 Navy (for Facilities and Equipment) 60,000 Total $570,000 EXPENDITURES ANNUAL GROSS ALLOCATIONS OBLIGATIONS PERSONAL SERVICES $355,150 $351,441 PERSONAL BENEFITS 28,000 27,420 TRAVEL 4,150 3,977 RENTALS 16,850 16,723 PRINTING 5,400 5,230 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES JITCO $ 33,000 $ 33,000 SANYO. 22,385 22,385 Hydro Support (Includes 1401-7070 Exp.) 24,015 23,828 Misc. 1,200 1,200 CONTRACTS (TOTAL) $ 80,600 $ 80,413 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS $ 18,500 $ 18,557 FACILITIES, HOUSEKEEPING SERVICE 50,000 48,328 SUPPORT COST, EQUIPMENT 11,350 11,335 TOTAL $570,000 $563,424 DATA OUT RECEIVED SPENT CARRIED FORWARD FY-63 $60,410.48 $23,503.95 $30,845.04 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Amount of Contribution for FY 62 BALANCE $3,709 580 173 127 170 $ 00 00 1,672 15 $6,576 UNSPENT $6,061.49 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 631 PERSONNEL The NODC started Fiscal Year 1962 with 60 employees and completed the year with 65 full-time employees and 2 part-time employees. The ‘‘on board"’ count at the end of the year in- cluded 26 professionals ranging from GS-5 to GS-16, 20 scientific support personnel ranging from GS-4 to GS-7, and 21 administrative and other support personnel ranging from GS-3 to GS-9. Status of personnel during FY 1962 is shown in Table 1 and Graph] POSITION DESCRIPTIONS During the past year several key positions have been written and all Branch Head positions have been graded out with the exception of the position of the Head of the Information Branch. RECRUITMENT The NODC has had considerable trouble in recruitment of professional personnel at the GS-5 and GS-7 level. It is felt that a more vigorous recruitment program should be placed into effect to recruit these people when available and exceed ceiling if necessary. Experience shows about 85% of recruitment commitments in this category decline prior to their reporting date. 632 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF POSITION (Grade) Oceanographer, GS-16 (PL SIS) ASS. wing @ceanographer GS4e eh eae eee @ceanographer, GSAS a nn ae eee @ceanographensGool2 nh ee eee @ceanographerGS-alilipga ee eae ee ee @ceanognraphen-2GS Wi O@ceanographerGS-7. we oe eee: Soak) @ceanographer~;Gs-5) sane oe oe eae Oceanographer (Geol.), GS-12................... @ceanographer, (Biols)"GS-IMi= = sae) see ee Mathematiciann.GS-l\Sn pee Soke) Sees Sie cae Cartographer. GSalilices aa oes Aaisee ae oe eee Geophysicist (Earth Physics), GS-11............... PhysuscienceNech.\GS-7/2 525-5 tes oa a epee Phys» Sciencemlech!, GS-6 Ne-heet. A aoe MeN Physt’Science lech: #GS-Sise jremtises? 0558 Se - PhysesSciencejilech. vGS-4inen tipeties SSanee One Ee AdministrativeyAssts1G 9-9) anne StatisticalsGlerke'GS-Ab ae) nce) cele ere eicntan en eee EAMiProjectatlannerGS-74), 905 ne eee Student Trainee (Oceanography), GS-3 Scientitical lustratona GS-6 einstein eae ene ene Scientificilllustratonn GS-5 sense ener NabwEquips © peratoin GS-4 ne ene NabwEquips©peratonnn GS-3) iene ee eee CardiPunchi@peratonn GS-4 ener GardiPunchi©peratom GS-Se eee een Secretanya(Stenos)GS-Olmni re elaine Secretary (Stenos), 'GS-5).5 a ed he, JL Pe Glerkg(Stenos)MGS-Si ree coe ences s Sr ster sega Secretary (hyping) GS- ory ee ee eee en eee Glerk=Typist7?GS-40. os ee ce he a OM Glerk-Ty pistGS=3h nee he ad a8 co sine POSITIONS Total FILLED VACANT 633 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 GRAPH 1 STATUS OF NODC PERSONNEL Rkik&& k&k& Qik: hh hhh Mh SSS SS SS SS WM SSS SS SOOO © lee I) EK ISSSSSSS SSS SSS SaaA01dW4 JO YSEWNN V////A ASSIGNED AND DETAILED 22522] RECRUITMENTS AND COMMITMENTS HE) “TRANSFERS OUT OR RESIGNATIONS 634 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 PRODUCTION WORK Bathythermograph Data Graph Number 2 shows the level of bathythermograph (BT) data processing and Graph Number 3 receipt of BT's during Fiscal Year 1962. The contract let to John |. Thompson Company (JITCO) of Washington, D. C. to reduce the backlog of BT data was terminated January 1962. During the same month, the processing procedures of BT data were re-evaluated and certain quality control checks have been added to increase the quality and usability of the data. Other modifications are expected to follow in the near future. These revised procedures, along with loss of manhours to fulfill ‘‘data out’' requests, have reduced our monthly production from 6,000 observations per month to about 1,500 per month. The NODC has agreements with Scripps Institution of Oceanography (SIO) and Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOl) for exchange of BT data. Under the arrangement, NODC pro- vides to SIO two prints of each completely processed BT observation for the Pacific and Indian Oceans; SIO provides NODC with one print of each SIO processed observation. NODC provides to WHOI one print of each processed BT observation for the North Atlantic Ocean; WHOI provides NODC with one print of each WHOI processed observation. The NODC has been investigating means of automating the processing of BT data. At present, we are testing and evaluating an Automatic BT Slide Holding and Advancing System de- signed and built for us by the Instrumentation Division of the Oceanographic Office. It is estimated that this device may save up to 3.0 man years of work annually along with the elimination of con- siderable repetitive handling and sorting of glass BT slides. Additionally, IBM, Gulton Industries and Hytech Corporation have expressed interest in developing an automatic scanning device to read and digitize BT slide negatives or prints. Each has been supplied the necessary samples of data and material for the development of such a system. Also planned for the near future are the construction and installation of an Automatic Film Feed and Cutting System to be adapted to the BT cameras and the conversion of the Ozalid machines to operate under the Anhydrous System. It is hoped that the automation of many of the BT proc- essing procedures will reduce the time required for the digitization of the more than 750,000 bathy- thermograph observations in the NODC archives. Oceanographic Station Data Oceanographic station data production is shown by month and for the period covered by this report in Graph 4. The average production rate has been about 5,000 stations per month. A total of 60,619 stations (of which 11,537 were coded and keypunched under contract with the Sanyo Surveying Company of Japan, but computed and edited by the NODC) was processed during the past year; the oceanographic station data archives now total about 215,000 stations. The reduced production rate in the last quarter of Fiscal Year 1962 was caused by the transfer of personnel from production work to Data Out projects for NUOS, BCF and others. It was impossible to recruit the additional staff required to maintain work in both areas. Personnel shifts were made assigning priority to Data Out projects and temporarily de-emphasizing routine production work. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 635 Oceanographic Station Data At the beginning of Fiscal Year 1962 the NODC archives consisted mainly of oceanographic station data for the North Atlantic Ocean area; during the year, increased emphasis has been given to processing data for the Pacific and Indian Oceans. To the best of our knowledge the only un- processed Indian Ocean data are recent observations which were received by NODC late in Fiscal Year 1962. The Indian Ocean Geo-Sort is completed and a listing is being readied for release. Work has begun to adapt the existing holdings to the approved NODC Physical-Chemical Oceanographic Station Punch Card and recomputing sound velocity values according to Wilson's formulas. It has been definitely established that the basic NODC files will retain material in metric units insofar as feasible. 636 NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 GRAPH 3 BT RECEIPTS 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 (0) JUL AUG SEPT OCT NOV _ DEC | JAN FEB MAR APR 1961 1962 — — — SCRIPPS INSTITUTION OF OCEANOGRAPHY WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION e@eeeceeeee OTHERS O————©_ UNPROCESSED SLIDES MAY JUN 637 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 638 4 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 639 MAJOR DATA OUT PROJECTS BUREAU OF COMMERCIAL FISHERIES PROJECT The NODC contribution (20 charts, 1 table, and a bibliography of oceanographic station data sources) to the BCF brochure ‘‘Provisional Oceanographic Charts, Tropical Atlantic’’ was pre- pared for use by the participants in the IOC Working Group Meeting on International Cooperative Investigations of the Tropical Atlantic, which was held at NODC on June 20—23, 1962. This docu- ment served as a review of existing information and was of assistance in the planning of cruises, particularly in positioning of the station lines and the spacing of the stations along these lines. In addition, the NODC ‘‘Proposal for Exchange and Publication of Data and Preparation and Publica- tion of an Atlas'’ was accepted with minor modifications by the Working Group. With this proposal, NODC is obligated to participate in the EQUALANT | and EQUALANT Il programs. The Data Center will accept, process and exchange data with the participants, and prepare and publish Data Reports after each synoptic survey; the proposal also included a requirement for the preparation and publication of an atlas of the Equatorial Atlantic under the guidance of an International Board of Editors. DATA EVALUATION PROJECTS During the last part of Fiscal Year 1962 the National Oceanographic Data Center undertook two data evaluation projects. The first, which is being done for the Office of Naval Research, is concerned with evaluations of data obtained during the hurricane CARLA from an unmanned weather buoy designated NOMAD (Navy Oceanographic and Meteorological Automatic Device) which was moored in the middle of the Gulf of Mexico. Work was begun at the end of Fiscal Year 1962. The NODC will investigate data collected from this weather buoy during the passage of hurricane CARLA to assess the value of similar unmanned buoys in the prediction of oceanographic conditions during storm surges, abnormal tides, and other extreme oceanographic phenomena resulting from hurricanes. This project, which is expected to take approximately 9 to 12 months to complete, will have as its final product a summary report consisting of text, charts and graphs showing the relative con- tribution of a buoy system to the accuracy of analysis of enviromental conditions in an open marine area and a marine coastal area. The first phase of the second data evaluation project, undertaken for the Navy Underwater Ordnance Station (NUOS), was completed during Fiscal Year 1962. This project consists of a thorough examination and comparative analysis of historical data and contemporary data collected in a deep sea area. Special techniques for manual interpolation of various oceanographic param- eters at standard levels were devised. Some of the basic work which has been done manually will be programmed for machine plotting in Fiscal Year 1963. It is expected that this project will be extended at least 6 months into Fiscal Year 1963 depending on the exact specifications received. 640 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 DATA REQUESTS (Reimbursable) During the Fiscal Year 1962 the NODC completed 27 reimbursable requests for data ata cost of $23,503.95. As the scientific community became increasingly aware of the facilities available at the Data Center, the diversity of requests increased. Although requests for basic data predomi- nated, requests for information which require analysis and special handling were especially notable during the last quarter. It is expected that the need for these more complex ‘‘specialized’’ requests will increase significantly during the coming Fiscal Year. Funds expended during this Fiscal Year increased 6 times over Fiscal Year 1961. Reimbursable requests completed during Fiscal Year 1962 are summarized in Table 2, and itemized in Table 3. EXCHANGE WORK (Non-Reimbursable) The NODC encouraged and developed oceanographic data exchange programs with all activities in any country indicating a desire to participate. Punch cards for about 8,000 Japanese oceanographic stations were added to the archives of Pacific holdings. Approximately 2,500 stations from the North Polar Front Survey were forwarded, in publication format, to the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) in exchange for receipt of these data. The relocation of WDC-A for Oceanography, in facilities adjacent to-NODC in the last quarter of Fiscal Year 1962, will help in centralizing the United States foreign exchange effort. The survey activity in two international oceanographic programs (IIOE and ICITA) during the next fiscal year will significantly increase the amount of oceanographic station data to be exchanged; we also expect to begin the exchange of biological and geological data during Fiscal Year 1963. Exchanges of data are summarized in Table 4, and given in detail in Table 5. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS (Non-Reimbursable) About 35 inquiries requesting either small amounts of data or answers to single questions were answered during the fiscal year and were provided at no cost. In general, data and informa- tion costing less than $25.00 to supply were provided at no cost. Data inquiries involving only nominal costs are answered without reimbursement. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 641 TABLE 2 SUMMARY OF DATA REQUESTS (REIMBURSABLE) (July 1961 — June 1962) NO. OF COST TO REQUESTS TREO FADETA CONSUMER 27 Listings $23,503.95 Reproduction Services Research 35-877 O—¢64—__49 642 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 TABLE 3 DETAILED LIST OF DATA REQUESTS (REIMBURSABLE) ACTIVITY Lt. Kang, Republic of Korea Lamont Geological Observatory (Wust) NHO Code 3000 NHO Code 3500 NHO Code 3412 NHO Code 3300 Lamont Geological Observatory (Heezen) Western Electric Naval Underwater Ordnance Station Naval Research Laboratory (Stewart) TYPE OF DATA AND/OR NO. OF OBS. 5500 BT prints 1036 stations oceano- graphic station data Listings oceanographic station data Services for survey in TOTO BT search and reproduction Ocean station data and sea and swell listings and punch card reproduction Ocean station data listings 417 stations Oceanographic station data Analysis and supporting services of ocean data from TOTO 1874 BT prints 31 pages of sea surface temperatures SERVICE PROVIDED AND COST TO CONSUMER Reproduction $ 343.07 Listings $ 75.61 Listings $ 1,051.89 $10,428.09 $ 211.43 Listings $ 1,056.64 Listings $ 362.50 Listings $ 97.84 Services $ 5,306.02 Reproduction $ 69.16 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 ACTIVITY ONR (LeSchack) Scripps Institution of Oceanography Gulf Coast Research Underseas Cable Corp. Loral Electronics Socony Mobil Oil Co. Arctic Institute of North America Colorado State Univ. (Riehl) Tufts University (Mac Donald) New York University University of California TABLE 3 (CONT'D) TYPE OF DATA AND NO. OF OBS. Ocean station data 225 stations 754 stations Ocean station data 150 stations Ocean station data 50 stations Ocean station data BT and ocean station data listings Heat flow search and abstracts Ocean station data listings 502 obs BT prints 544 stations Ocean station data Ocean station data listings 876 photo copies Vityaz Cruise SERVICE PROVIDED AND 643 COST TO CONSUMER Listings $ 17.07 Listings $ 25.15 Listings $ 9.23 Listings $ 65.53 Listings $ 79.63 Research $ 96.22 Listings $ 75.08 Reproduction $ 20.93 Listings $ 19.23 Listings $142.97 Reproduction $ 53.20 644. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 ACTIVITY University of Southern California (Malkus) University of California (Reid) Harvard University (Stommel) Coast and Geodetic Survey Bureau of Commercial Fisheries (Wash. Lab.) Bureau of Commercial Fisheries (Hawaii, HBL) TABLE 3 (CONT'D) TYPE OF DATA AND NO. OF OBS. 1400 obs BT prints Duplicate ocean station data listings 993 stations Ocean station data Ocean station data—all data submitted in FY62 Supporting services for ICITA 30,000 stations ocean station data; punch card reproduction and listings SERVICE PROVIDED AND COST TO CONSUMER Reproduction Sa 238 Listings $ 125.34 Listings So vale Pub. Listings 78.78 Services $1,449.59 Listings $2,134.28 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 645 TABLE 4 SUMMARY OF DATA EXCHANGES (July 1961—June 1962) NO. OF NO. OF EXCHANGES eg areola OBSERVATIONS COSTM OE NODE 13 BT prints 111,559 $ 5,606.35 1 Ocean stations 3,281 $ 180.00 1 Computed punch $17,967.00 cards iene 114,840 $23,753.35 646 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 TABLE 5 DETAILED LIST OF DATA EXCHANGES (July 1961—June 1962) TYPE OF DATA SERVICES PROVIDED ACTIVITY AND AND NO. OF OBS. COST TO NODC Argentina 82 BT prints $ 4.00 Canada 20 BT prints $ 1.00 Great Britain 5,931 BT prints $ 296.00 pda apes cat 56 aoae Japan a Bunch $17,967.00 Netherlands 94 BT prints $ 5.00 New Zealand 754 BT prints $ 38.00 slo 17,214 BT prints $ 3,560.00 WHOI 28,485 BT prints $ 1,424.00 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 ACTIVITY Cc&GS F& WS NHO Chile ICES Union of South Africa TABLE 5 (CONT'D) TYPE OF DATA AND NO. OF OBS. 18 BT prints 529 BT prints 2325 BT prints 4 BT prints 2,581 stations 3 BT prints AND COST TO NODC $ 26.00 $116.00 $180.00 647 SERVICES PROVIDED 648 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 DEVELOPMENT OF INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEM AND PUNCH CARD FORMATS GEOLOGICAL, GEOPHYSICAL, AND BIOLOGICAL DATA During FY-62 NODC began its investigation of various possible information and data storage and retrieval systems that might prove suitable for adaptation to geological, geophysical and bio- logical oceanography material. A system has been proposed and a pilot project begun; it includes a potential for location and recall of both digital and non-digital types of material. In addition to investigating various storage-retrieval systems, some study of useful supporting equipment will be required. Concurrently, the NODC is developing proposed digitization schemes and punch cards for geological, geophysical, biological, ice and other physical data for presentation to the oceanographic community. A few preliminary test cases have been put on punch cards; upon completion of the test the results will be circulated to the scientific community for comments and further recommendations. Dr. Harris B. Stewart, Jr. has been appointed chairman of the ad hoc NODC Advisory Com- mittee on Geophysical and Geological Data; its purpose is to advise and to provide technical guidance to NODCin the developing of the marine geophysical and geological storage retrieval problem (s). The ad hoc Committee on Geological Data met on 25 June 1962; those in attendance were: CHAIRMAN—Dr. Harris B. Stewart, Jr. MEMBERS: Mr. Jack Kofoed—U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Mr. James Trumbull—U.S. Geological Survey Mr. George Keller—U.S. Naval Oceanographic Office Dr. Robert Schmalz—Pennsylvania State University Dr. H.G. Goodell—Florida State University Dr. Joe S. Creager—University of Washington Mr. John Hathaway—USGS Denver, Colorado Dr. Woodrow C. Jacobs—National Oceanographic Data Center Mr. Harold W. Dubach—National Oceanographic Data Center Mr. Robert VY. Ochinero—National Oceanographic Data Center Mr. Robert W. Taber—National Oceanographic Data Center Dr. Anthony R. Picciolo—National Oceanographic Data Center Mr. Franklin D. Derenge—National Oceanographic Data Center NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 649 The ad hoc Committee on Geophysical Data met on 26 June 1962; those in attendance were: CHAIRMAN—Dr. Harris B. Stewart, Jr. MEMBERS: Mr. Hyman Orlin—U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Mr. Michael Smalet—U.S. Naval Oceanographic Office Dr. J. Lamar Worzel—Lamont Geological Observatory Mr. Martin Kane—U.S. Geological Survey OTHERS: Dr. Woodrow C. Jacobs—National Oceanographic Data Center Mr. Harold W. Dubach—National Oceanographic Data Center Mr. Robert V. Ochinero—National Oceanographic Data Center Mr. Robert W. Taber—National Oceanographic Data Center Dr. Anthony R. Picciolo—National Oceanographic Data Center Mr. Franklin D. Derenge—National Oceanographic Data Center Items considered by both Committees were: 1. Items to be included on punch card format. 2. Units and codes for punch cards. 3. Plans for an information retrieval system for data reports. 4. Adequacy of plans and timing as outlined on action milestone charts. Based upon the recommendations of the geological-geophysical ad hoc committe, the NODC plans to proceed on the programs as follows: 1. Preliminary punch cards for bottom sediments and gravity will be developed. 2. Preliminary formats will be circulated throughout the marine geological and geo- physical community for comments. ‘ 3. Revised proposed formats will be submitted to the NODC Advisory Board for approval. 4. Development will continue on punch card formats for other geophysical and geo- logical projects. 5. Development will begin on a system for bathymetric data as soon as a subject specialist is recruited. Data Reports in IGY WDC-A for Oceanography will be indexed. 7. Data Reports in |IGY WDC-A for Geomagnetism, Gravity and Seismology will be indexed. S 650 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 DEVELOPMENT OF SYSTEMS FOR PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL DATA OCEANOGRAPHIC STATION DATA The punch card format for recording oceanographic station data was revised and approved by the NODC Advisory Board on 12 May 1961. This card format was designed in conjunction with the recommendations of the EPOC Committee on Machine Processing of Oceanographic Data and others in the oceanographic commmunity. AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING Procedures for processing data into the new Oceanographic Station Card were in the final stages of development by the end of the fiscal year. In Fiscal Year 1963 these procedures will be implemented; new cruises will be reduced and processed in accordance with the requirements of the new card format. A new routine has been added to the computer program (IBM 7070) to compute the velocity of sound in sea water according to the formulas developed by Wayne D. Wilson. Suitable codes have been set up for the punch cards and listings to identify stations containing velocities computed by Wilson's formulas. During Fiscal Year 1963 it is planned to convert the EAM system of archiving these data (punched cards) to an EDP system (magnetic tape). The EDP archiving system will greatly increase NODC capability for processing (updating, inventorying, arranging, analyzing and evaluating, select- ing, disseminating, etc.) these data to meet user requirements and will provide greater flexibility and responsiveness. In addition, improved computer interpolation, computation, and quality control techniques are planned. BATHYTHERMOGRAPH (BT) DATA In addition to conducting studies on the validity of BT observational and processing procedures, the NODC staff has been working on a revision of the Provisional Bathythermograph Log and a digitization scheme for putting BT data on machine punched cards. Considerable progress has been made on the development of a BT card format, and NODC expects to submit its format for comment to the oceanographic community early in Fiscal Year 1963. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 651 PUBLICATIONS NODC Publications in print and available for distribution are as follows: Publication G-2, Oceanographic Vessels of the World Publication C-1, Reference Sources for Oceanographic Station Data (Provisional) Publications in draft are as follows: Publication G-1, Introduction to the National Oceanographic Data Center Publication C-2, Catalog of BT Data, World Wide (will replace SP-12 Part Ila which is now out of print) Publication C-4, Catalog of Oceanographic Data, Indian Ocean Publication C-5, Catalog of Oceanographic Data, North Pacific Ocean Publication M-1, Conversion Tables for Use by the International Indian Ocean Expedition Publication M-2, Processing Physical and Chemical Data from Oceanographic Stations The NODC NEWSLETTER is now forwarded to approximately 520 recipients; some of these receive several copies. Judging from letters received concerning this NEWSLETTER it appears to be well accepted throughout the oceanographic community and by private industry and international activities. The NEWSLETTER is published at the end of each month, and contributions on work and activities of scientists which seem to be of general interest are included in the NEWSLETTER. 652 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 IGY WORLD DATA CENTER A, OCEANOGRAPHY The World Data Center A, Oceanography, was officially relocated in Building 160, Washing- ton 25, D. C. on 8 March 1962, at which time Dr. Jacobs assumed its directorship. The bulk of the reference material from the Department of Oceanography and Meteorology of Texas A & M was delivered on that day; the remaining materials were transferred before the end of June 1962. At the time of the transfer the WDC-A holdings included data from about 25,000 oceano- graphic stations plus a variety of other data in various forms. Since this transfer, 763 stations have been added to the holdings; two shipments of documents have been received from WDC-B. A cross- index reference system of WDC-A and NODC assigned oceanographic cruise numbers has been established. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 653 FUTURE PLANS During the last half of Fiscal Year 1963 the NODC plans to initiate a pilot program to develop techniques and procedures for direct communication between NODC and survey ships so that raw observations can be serviced by NODC during the course of survey activities. By use of computer programs, NODC could perform the thermometric corrections and further process the data, returning the results to the ship's scientists for use in modifying survey plans as may be required for the research investigation underway. The NODC will continue the functions of WDC-A; it will continue to contribute to major inter- national programs such as IIOE and the International Cooperative Investigations of the Tropical Atlantic as the opportunities to be of service present themselves. A direct communications link with the Canadian Oceanographic Data Center, its east and west coast oceanographic laboratories, and an Arctic laboratory is in prospect. The NODC expects to obtain, by the end of Fiscal Year 1964, a total picture of the process- ing problems related to satellite recorded oceanographic information (radiation and ice data). This program will be done in cooperation with NASA and the Weather Bureau. By the end of Fiscal Year 1964 the NODC plans to have schemes for processing, holding and retrieving some types of marine geological, geophysical and biological data available for presentation to the oceanographic community. Respectfully submitted, A ] i 7) / Ge Cc ee W.C. JACOBS Director 1 July 1962 Approved by NODC Interagency Advisory Board at meeting of 20 July 1962 to eee “a aelliviee cousue He srwos per geek 00H. a bosivene pa” hob ar? opaaety tedtrnut bre encitadtics nittemonedt at meted: blua> . 108 besiupey 6d iemie ay armoky rons peihibtven ii -oeu vot ateilveiia’ g ‘gine pasa te etary at of tet casita Nahe meee feaiqort orf! Yq" ath SANTN NS, avd 200 as > “Bai mn he Fite Hea, a fordisnupheveD. a Saprita aovienaerigatt icseaNs noly | pat me ev ae Pi i a 8 AG ie Bhi epi Seapine OePhigeeos eeweiiol Tak fhe: Comorian of Ccearndgrcghy ad ai aldeonocd nit Ayia iretetyny Sugoh ay wrOks agate lap Je tag at velo ape OF ant? (niee, pub bon p retail a tes wie Ceres irda yoeie Ned tine A te ‘na Gp reag VTS) Bi MPN NTY OB Met ee ‘A it we AUR PRUNES, Lerdbtodhicgrina nag ign ne, sarvonaiayod at Encke OOM edi, MeL wud rere hole dovigplaid hae olnginetioen, lpauptose. an) Sido hivig bused, Atinuuenenny ? ne ‘Sottihdue yilutiveqced tue COCOA SD WY rein SHOT hati eed yrorvba yonngon APPENDIX 9 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC DATA CENTER—FISCAL YEAR 1963, SUBMITTED BY MR. HAROLD W. DUBACH, DEPUTY, NODC > 1 oi he r al ehefe a, Cee ‘Hou a ne Pa ee: aes, ~ = See wd eel ‘ ay i qi f ; hed ep YRS HUI TM NESS LTTE RRS: NG Act ME EE Hl me @¢ XIGuaATIA DIBTAHDO“ANOO JAMOITAM. CHT SO TH AM Ya GuTrimase goer AAMT es vente ap tnt met mb i ii rr mat mem ne ~ ie PES CAIN OTC NG A CC NERA a EL LOLS LLANE LENS COSY Gilt NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC DATA CENTER ANNUAL REPORT OF THE NODC (JULY 1962—JUNE 1963) Washington 25, D.C. fer) OU “1 35-377 O—64—43 658 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Resumevof: Work). oc 3..0 ski ere nae RMS ees aie ey hse ee 1 Sponsoring Agencies of the NODC and Representatives on the! Interagency, Advisory Board sec). ae sok a ee oo eee ee 3 Summary of: Funds: .).2 405 0 a OR a 4 FY-63 Policy Decisions of the NODC Advisory Board....................... 5 Production: Work: 2205 Aig aie sds tie tee re eel nerd eM hyo Ey I 6 MajoriDataRequests!: cis: = 2 ae Pete a She a cate aes 7 Summary of Data Requests). 2i::c 5 cc.) 5 eng on ehes 2 a ee 9 Exchange Work2ic sic siecle elk cea Sistas re) aiteleney alk eit ea a iat oi (a oo 13 Development of Systems and Punch Card Formats......................... 16 Development of Systems for Physical and Chemical Data.................... 18 NODG ‘Publications: 2.0.80) 3. najida ee ie A eae 19 IGY World Data Center A, Oceanography.............................-.- 20 World'DataiGenter,/A,; Publications... {62.0 + 4 2s on ne eee 21 Administrative Matters). 5 inc Ge ole oe ouslee slo as a gle ee 22 Future Rlans.cc0 ssf sie cepa tolls Nien an STA UN aaey ls ok On rr 23 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 659 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC DATA CENTER Fiscal Year 1963 has been an outstanding year for the growth and development of the NODC despite many obstacles and the increasing pressure of data collected during numerous oceanographic surveys. The emphasis on production was somewhat shifted during the year in the interest of main- taining quality of dcta rather than quantity of data. Much effort had to be devoted to developmental areas for streamlining the processing procedures for oceanographic station data and BT data, to in- crease the quality of the latter, to handle the current flow of data, and to anticipate the increased receipts of the data. The NODC undertook several studies on the problems of quality in BT's and their digitization. In addition to these studies, numerous commercial organizations have presented proposals for automation of BT processing. For a special request, the NODC undertook a manual digitization program of BT's; however, a manual system would never be able to cope with the present archived analog BT's nor incoming data, so this interest and cooperation from industry improves the outlook on the BT problem. Investigations are already under way to provide for greater automation of the oceanographic station data processing system. The scientific community has become increasingly aware of the NODC and the services and data which it can provide; for example, the reimbursable requests for data and services represented a monetary increase of about 10 times more than those for FY-62. Indicative of the trend of services being requested of the NODC is the fact that of these reimbursable requests over 50% of their dollar value was for data evaluation and analysis. The data services for which there has been no charge have also increased significantly. The exchange activities of the NODC have increased and will probably continue to increase over the next few years with the involvement of NODC as a contributor of services to international oceanographic expeditions. Minor requests for which there has been no charge have increased to about 15 times the number for FY-62. To increase the capability of some of the younger and less experienced NODC staff members, we have taken advantage of several training programs and training opportunities; for example, each year, new employees at the GS-5 or -7 level enter a technical orientation-training program under the Civil Service Training Agreement. During FY-63, the NODC sent two employees to the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution for an advanced course in oceanography; personnel from NODC served on five different oceanographic survey cruises. To enable the NODC to process data other than physical-chemical data, the programs for developing holding-recall systems for geological-geophysical and biological data have been given added impetus. Ad hoc committees have been convened for these types of data to review the work of the Data Center to date in these areas and to provide guidance. The publications of the NODC and presentations of the Director, Deputy Director, and staff before various scientific groups have considerably publicized the Data Center and its work. The NODC NEWSLETTER, for example, now has a distribution of over 1,000 copies in the United States and abroad. The Director of NODC has made presentations to such groups as the Federal Council for Science and Technology, the Navy Research and Development Clinic, and the Eastern Pacific Oceanic Conference. 660 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 In addition to his presentations to these groups, the Director has served as Chairman of the Joint ICO -ICAS (Interagency Committee on Oceanography — Interdepartmental Committee on Atmospheric Sciences) ad hoc Panel on Ocean-Atmosphere Research, has been an observer on many of the committees of the ICO and has served as a member of the Intergovernmental Oceano- graphic Commission (IOC) working group on data exchanges. Members of the staff have presented papers to the Navy Research and Development Clinic, the American Society of Limnology and Oceanography Sixth Conference on Great Lakes Research, and the Atlantic Estuarine Research Society. Members of the staff have contributed or have started articles or material for such publica- tions as the Mariners Weather Log, the American Zoologist, the McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Science and Technology Yearbook, a book on hydrospace, and the Hidaka Memorial Volume. The Director and two members of the staff were asked by the American Geophysicai Union to edit technically English translations of three Russian scientific volumes. Letters have been sent to those government agencies with an interest in oceanography, but which are not sponsors of the NODC, inquiring as to the possibility of their becoming sponsors. By the end of Fiscal Year 1963, three had responded affirmatively. The Coast Guard and the Geological Survey will become sponsors beginning in FY-64, and the Beach Erosion Board will become one of the sponsors of the NODC in FY-65. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 661 The sponsoring agencies and their representatives on the Interagency Advisory Board are: ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION Dr. Vincent Schultz BUREAU OF COMMERCIAL FISHERIES Mr. Howard Eckles COAST AND GEODETIC SURVEY Dr. Harris B. Stewart, Jr. NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION Dr. John Lyman NAVAL OCEANOGRAPHIC OFFICE Mr. Boyd E. Olson OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH Dr. Arthur E. Maxwell WEATHER BUREAU Mr. Robert Schloemer NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES Dr. Milner B. Schaefer Institute of Marine Resources Dr. Donald Pritchard The Johns Hopkins University NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC DATA CENTER Dr. Woodrow C. Jacobs Director, ex officio Member of Board 662 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 SUMMARY OF FUNDS DATA IN: This is a fiscal summary of funds received and expended in Fiscal Year 1963 covering the normal operating costs required to process oceanographic data into existing standard holding- recall systems. RECEIPTS Supporting Agency Atomic Energy Commission Bureau of Commercial Fisheries Coast and Geodetic Survey National Science Foundation Navy Weather Bureau Navy (for Facilities and Equipment) EXPENDITURES PERSONNEL SERVICES PERSONNEL BENEFITS TRAVEL TRANSPORTATION RENTALS PRINTING CONTRACTUAL SERVICES SANYO Hydro Support (Includes 1401-7070 Exp.) Misc. CONTRACTS (Total) SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS FACILITIES, HOUSEKEEPING SERVICE EQUIPMENT RESERVE TOTAL DATA OUT (REIMBURSABLE MONEY) RECEIVED $220,234 Total Agency Support Total ANNUAL ALLOCATIONS $380,300 36,000 8,300 200 15,700 4,000 $ 18,000 32,834 3,666 $ 54,500 13,900 40,000 19,500 3,000 $575,400 SPENT $170.720 $ 10,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 259,400 10,000 $519,400 56,000 $575,400 GROSS OBLIGATIONS $386,531 37,004 6,963 315 13,735 4,873 $ 18,000 34,042 3,666 $ 55,708 11,048 32,467 16,401 $565,045 Amount of Contribution for FY-63 BALANCE $—6,231 —1,004 1,337 — 115 1,965 — 873 $00 —1,208 00 $—1,208 2,852 7,533 3,099 3,000 $10,355 CARRIED FORWARD FY-64 $49,514 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 663 POLICY DECISIONS BY THE NODC ADVISORY BOARD FOR FISCAL YEAR 1963 The following items, quoted or paraphrased from the NODC Advisory Board Minutes, represent the policy decisions made by the Board during FY-63. At the meeting of 15 January, the Advisory Board decided that it was not mandatory that the Chairmanship and Vice-Chairmanship be rotated each year. Both Chairman and Vice-Chairman may serve consecutive terms. It was the Advisory Board's decision at the meet- ing of 20 July that the reciprocity in data exchange be left to the discretion of the Director of the World Data Center-A (WDC-A), Oceanography; the Board felt that the distinction between NODC and WDC-A _ and the respective areas of obligation and responsibility should be clearly set forth by the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC). 664 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 PRODUCTION WORK BATHYTHERMOGRAPH DATA ANALOG PRODUCTION During Fiscal Year 1963, the NODC received 61,714 bathythermograph (BT) observations. It is estimated that approximately 20% of these BT's were recieved from ships involved in survey operations. A total of 12,184 BT observations were processed and archived; 48,736 ozalid analog copies of these data were distributed to the contributors and to others having a standing requirement. Emphasis was placed on the processing of survey and exchange type data primarily because more usable BT data could be archived per man-hour and because a greater percentage of these observa- tions are taken in ‘‘sparse data lanes.” Processing procedures for BT data were evaluated and revamped in order to increase the processing rate without an undue sacrifice of quality. Indications are that an average of approxi- mately 3,000-4,000 BT observations can be processed (as analog cards) monthly using the revised methods during the first quarter of FY-64. The agreements that the NODC has with Scripps Institution of Oceanography (SIO) and Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) for the exchange of analog BT data continues. However, negotiations were started with SIO to receive their BT data in a digitized format rather than in the conventional analog form. It is planned to approach WHOI with a similar proposal. DIGITIZATION BT data, as currently archived at the NODC, are at best ‘‘unsatisfactory"’ from the standpoint of usability. These data must be digitized according to the common need of all for efficient utilization by the oceanographic community. Impetus (including funds) for initiating the ‘‘standard”’ digitization of BT data was provided by the Navy Electronics Laboratory (NEL); approximately 40,000 digitized BT observations were requested for an area in the Pacific Ocean. A total of 8,204 was completed; 15,242 additional observations were in different phases of production at the close of the fiscal year. During FY-63, five unsolicited proposals were received for an automated reader—digitization system; it is anticipated that eight others will be received during July and August 1963. Full imple- mentation of automated BT processing direct from the slide is planned for Fiscal Year 1964. OCEANOGRAPHIC STATION DATA Oceanographic station data were pfocessed at an average rate of about 1,600 stations per month. The production for Fiscal Year 1963 totaled about 20,000 stations. (Of these 8,000 were coded and keypunched under contract with the Sanyo Surveying Company of Japan, but computed and edited by the NODC.) The NODC Publication M-2, ‘Processing Physical and Chemical Data from Oceanographic Stations,"’ and new coding forms were used by about 15 domestic and foreign contributors in submitting about 1,500 stations to the NODC for processing; it is hoped that the number of contributors using the new coding forms will increase from about 7% in FY-63 to 50% during FY-64. The archives of ocean station data now totals about 235,000 stations; most of the station data added to the archives were from the Pacific, Indian, and South Atlantic Oceans. Additionally, approximately 25,000 stations for these same oceans were in various phases of completion at the end of the fiscal year. : NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 665 MAJOR DATA REQUESTS During FY-63, the NODC completed or began work on ten major ($2,500 or more} data requests. These were largely from government agencies which included the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries (BCF), the Navy Electronics Laboratory (NEL), the Naval Underwater Ordnance Station (NUOS), the Naval Oceanographic Office (NAVOCEANO), the Naval Air Development Center (NADC), and the Office of Naval Research (ONR). Private institutions and commercial organizations that made major use of the NODC’s data and services consisted of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography, the Raytheon Corporation, and the Martin-Marietta Corporation. The requirements of all the major requestors made each project mutually beneficial to the requestor and the NODC. The requestor was able to obtain services and data which might not have been available otherwise, and the NODC was able to increase its capability in various phases of data handling and analysis. Projects summarized below are given by subject rather than individually. DATA SELECTION The requests from the Raytheon Corporation and the Martin-Marietta Corporation required the selection of certain oceanographic station data and special studies of sound velocity. The selec- tion for Martin-Marietta was based on areas which are quasi-homogeneous with respect to oceano- graphic conditions. The requestor was provided with a listing of stations and special magnetic tapes for further computational work on sound velocity analyses. For the Raytheon Corporation, selection of data was made by analysis of specific areas with characteristic sound velocity structures; they were provided with listings and punch cards of selected data. DATA SELECTION AND SPECIAL PROCESSING At the request of the Naval Air Development Center (NADC), the NODC has begun a selec- tion of oceanographic stations suitable for sound velocity studies in particular ocean areas. At the end of FY-63, the initial data selection was about 30% complete. After the data selection is completed, graphics will be generated by high speed automated plotting equipment. These graphics will be analyzed to define and delimit oceanic regions with basically similar sound velocity structures. DATA DIGITIZATION In November 1962 the NODC began work in answer to a request from the Naval Electronics Laboratory (NEL) for all available physical and chemical data for the period 1949 through 1959 in specific areas of the Pacific Ocean. Inasmuch as *he requirement was for all data to be in digital form, preliminary work was required to develop an adequate ‘‘all-purpose’’ digitization scheme to provide BT data on punch cards rather than in the analeg form. On the basis of previous studies on digitization by the NODC, it was agreed to record the temperatures from the BT trace at constant intervals of 10 feet or 5 meters. The temperatures were read from the NODC archive analog prints. At the end of FY-63 8,204 of approximately 40,000 BT analog prints were coded, digitized, and punch cards and listings delivered. Other data forwarded in answer to this request consisted of approximately 290,000 punch cards of surface temperature data and about 80,000 cards for approximately 11,000 oceanographic stations. 666 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 DATA ANALYSIS A special study begun in FY-62 was continued during FY-63 for the Naval Underwater Ordnance Station (NUOS). This request required the development of special data processing, inter- polation, quality control, and computational techniques for oceanographic station data. The NODC has prepared for NUOS numerous special graphs, analyzed plots, and computed products based on 900 oceanographic stations. In addition, the NODC has been analyzing various aspects of the physical environment for this study. A final report on this work request will be submitted to NUOS at the end of the first quarter of FY-64. During the last quarter of FY-63 the NODC was requested by the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries (BCF) to conduct a special analysis of maximum and minimum bottom temperatures on George's Bank. All available oceanographic station, BT, sea surface temperature, and air tempera- ture data were investigated and a search was conducted for descriptive literature on bottom temperatures in the area. Data were selected and plotted on base charts and analyzed for expected maximum and minimum temperatures. The contours which have been constructed will be drafted and these final products and a brief text will be provided to the BCF. DATA EVALUATION During the second quarter of FY-63 the NODC was able to recruit personnel with oceano- graphic/meteorological background to work on a project requested by the Office of Naval Research (ONR) late in FY-62. The project consists of collecting data from the transmissions of the Navy Oceanographic Meteorological Automatic Device (NOMAD), inspecting and comparing these data with other independent data collections, and evaluating the data for use in oceanographic and meteorological applications. All the data concerned with NOMAD have been collected, collated, and plotted for analytical purposes. A pilot study has been completed and an evaluation by comparison with independent data is about one-half completed. A final report on the evaluation will be submitted to ONR during the second quarter of FY-64. In addition to the evaluation of the data, the NODC has been requested to provide an “optimum placement of NOMAD buoys” design. COMPUTER PROGRAMMING The Scripps Institution of Oceanography has requested the NODC to develop a computer program for surface current data. This program will summarize the H1-9 surface current data by one-degree squares and month. The computer program will provide resultant vector speed, direction, and the Vy and the Ve components. The average speed will be computed without consideration of direction. If, however, observations number less than four, only the individual current observa- tions will be printed out. The program was begun late in June. The work is scheduled for completion in August 1963. DATA REPRODUCTION The Naval Oceanographic Office (NAVOCEANO) has requested a major amount of data for particular ocean areas for various geographic and operational studies. For the Indian Ocean, the NODC has provided the sea, swell, and sea surface temperature data properly arranged for magnetic taping. By the end of FY-63 approximately one-half of the station data requested had been provided. For a specified area of the Eastern Atlantic the NODC has provided to the NAVOCEANO all BT's (analog), summaries of sea surface temperatures, sea, and swell, and station data for approximately 10,000 stations of 30,000 stations in the area. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 667 SUMMARY OF ALL DATA REQUESTS (REIMBURSABLE WORK) During FY-63, the NODC completed 51 reimbursable requests for data from 25 different activities; 10 additional requests were in work at the close of the fiscal year. In addition, reim- bursable funds for such projects as WDC-A, Oceanography, personnel assisting on surveys, and other ‘‘special’’ funds were received. These are not included as ‘‘request’’ items. Funds received for the projects totaled about $220,000. This represents a monetary increase of about 10 times the reimbursable monies received for requests in Fiscal Year 1962. The following table shows by percentage the types of services provided. TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF TYPES OF DATA SERVICES NO. OF % OF TOTAL TYPE OF SERVICE REQUESTS DOLLAR RE ZEIPTS (%) (approx.) Station Data Reproduction and Search 44 2 Data Evaluation and Analysis 17 56 BT Search and Reproduction 13 2 Combined (2 or more types of data for a specified geographic area) 13 35 Surface Data Reproduction (Currents, Waves, Sea Surface Temperatures) 10 4 Miscellaneous 3 1 The trend toward more complex analytical or interpretive requests which was expected in Fiscal Year 1962 developed in Fiscal Year 1963; however, the expected diversification in the types of data requests did not materialize. It is expected that as processed geological and biological data become available in future years, requests for these types of data will grow. Reimbursable items received during the Fiscal Year are summarized in Table 2, and completed requests are itemized in Table 3. 668 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 TABLE 2 SUMMARY OF DATA REQUESTS (REIMBURSABLE) (July 1962—June 1963) NO. OF COST TO REQUESTS CONSUMER Completed 51 $130,792 In Work 10 * $ 49,154 “Special Projects” $ 40,288 TOTAL $220,234 * Carried forward to FY-64 “Special Projects’’ include funds for World Data Center-A, Oceanography; for abstracting and bibliographic work by the American Meteorological Society; and for the training of foreign naval personnel in Data Center procedures. At its meeting on 16 October 1962 the NODC Avisory Board recognized the desirability of supporting the abstracting of the oceanographic literature as part of an overall data/information retrieval program. After a briefing by Mr. Malcolm Rigby of the American Meteorological Society it was decided to support the Society as the most logical organization to accomplish this work. AEC offered funds for the initial support of this work in FY 1963, providing the work would continue to receive support after FY 1963 in the NODC’s regular budget. The abstracts of the American Meteorological Society are published in Meteorological and Geoastrophysical Abstracts. A special bibliography (including abstracts) on Oceanographic Instru- mentation appeared in the April-May 1963 issues. Future issues will contain special bibliographies on the Indian Ocean, Subsurface Currents, and Heat Flow through the Bottom of the Ocean. In addition, oceanographic abstracts appear routinely in each issue. For a description of the work of World Data Center-A, see pages 20 and 21. The NSF pro- vides support for this function. 10 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 669 TABLE 3 DETAILED LIST OF DATA REQUESTS (REIMBURSABLE) BY ACTIVITIES ACTIVITY Raytheon Corporation (Paster) Bureau of Commercial Fisheries, Sandy Hook, New Jersey (Walford) Bureau of Commercial Fisheries, Washington Laboratory (Ckamberlain) Naval Oceanographic Office Code 3300 Naval Oceanographic Office Code 3400 Naval Oceanographic Office Code 3500 Naval Oceanographic Office Code 3800 American Miscellaneous Society (Petrie) Naval Weapons Laboratory Coast and Geodetic Survey (Starr) Sikorsky Aircraft Company (Withington) University of Miami (Burke) Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (Yensch) TYPE OF DATA AND/OR NO. OF OBS. Sound Velocity Analysis Temperature and salinity data—Gulf of Mexico Maximum & minimum tempera- tures George's Bank Ocean station data; sea and swell listings and punch card reproduction BT search and reproduction; station data; sea and swell listings; punch cards Ocean station data and publication listings Ocean station data publication listings and punch cards; statistical summaries Wave, wind, temperature data 482 BT prints in Gulf Stream Ocean station data listings; listings of Caribbean Geosort Selected BT data Ocean station data BT and ocean station data SERVICE PROVIDED Computed V, and analysis Search and reproduction Research & analysis Data reproduction Search & reproduction Data reproduction Data services and reproduction Search & reproduction Reproduction Reproduction Analysis & reproduction Sorting & reproduction Reproduction 670 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 TABLE 3 (CONT'D) DETAILED LIST OF DATA REQUESTS (REIMBURSABLE) BY ACTIVITIES ACTIVITY Colorado State University (Riehl) University of Washington (Coachman) Naval Research Laboratory (Stewart) Bell Telephone Laboratory (Taylor) Naval Electronics Laboratory San Diego (Anderson) Lamont Geological Observatory (Donn) Marine Advisors (Horrer) Ocean Science and Engineering, Inc. (Volkmann) Bureau of Commercial Fisheries, Washington Lab. (Austin) Martin-Marietta Company (Webb) American Telephone and Telegraph Company (Magruder) Lockheed-California Co. University of Miami (Rinkel) TYPE OF DATA AND/OR NO. OF OBS. 5,091 BT prints Ocean station data and punch cards Ocean station data Ocean station data (1,000 stations) Ocean station and BT data Ocean station data Wave roses and wave observations Surface currents, MS 042 and 079 Ocean station data in ICITA area, 2-part listings Sound velocity selection; station data for TOTO on magnetic tape Bottom temperature data between Vero Beach and St. Thomas Ocean station data listings and punch cards Ocean station listings and punch cards of Tropical Atlantic SERVICE PROVIDED Reproduction Reproduction Search & reproduction Search & reproduction Search & reproduction Analysis and reproduction Reproduction Sorting and reproduction Reproduction Analysis and reproduction Search Reproduction Reproduction NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 671 EXCHANGE WORK (Non-Reimbursable) The NODC continued to encourage and develop oceanographic data exchange programs with all activities. Punch cards for 5,233 Japanese oceanographic stations were added to the archives of Pacific holdings. Approximately 1,220 stations were forwarded, in publication format, to the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) in exchange for receipt of the same data in raw form. The establishment of data centers in Canada and Australia should facilitate and, to some degree, increase the exchange of data with these countries. It is expected data centers will also be organized in the near future in Japan and Great Britain. Exchange was initiated through World Data Center A (WDC-A) for Oceanography with the International Indian Ocean Expedition (IIOE) and International Investigations of the Tropical Atlantic (ICITA). It is expected that practically all data from international expeditions in the future will be acquired through WDC-A. It is also likely that all oceanographic data for declared national programs from 1960 onwards will be acquired through WDC-A. When this is an officially recognized requirement the work load in WDC-A will probably double. On 7—10 August 1962, the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC) Working Group on Data Exchange met at the NODC. Dr. Jacobs attended as representative for WDC-A. This meeting and its accomplishments are further discussed under ‘‘IGY World Data Center A, Oceanography” in this report. Table 5, Detailed List of Data Exchanges, shows the countries and institutions with which NODC exchanged station and bathythermograph data. The cost to NODC is also itemized. It should be pointed out that one of the chief advantages to the exchange program isa financial one; namely, the high ship/observer costs involved to obtain data vs. the low cost to process data taken by and available from others. It has been estimated, for example, that acquisition of station data through the exchange program pays off ona ratio of 100:1 (observing costs: processing costs). TABLE 4 SUMMARY OF DATA EXCHANGES NO. OF NO. OF EXCHANGES TYPE OF DATA OBSERVATIONS COST TO NODC 9 Ocean stations 10,973 $ 649.00 16 BT prints 45,620 2,281.10 1 Computed punch 5233 250.00 cards (stations) GRAND TOTAL 26 56,593 $3,180.10 13 672 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 COUNTRY OR ACTIVITY Argentina Canada Chile Denmark (ICES) Great Britain Japan New Zealand Peru Poland Union of South Africa USSR Venezuela Yugoslavia U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Columbia U. (Hudson Lab.) Miami, Univ. of Naval Oceanographic Office TABLE 5 DETAILED LIST OF DATA EXCHANGES TYPE OF DATA AND NO. OF OBS. 3,053 stations 5,000 stations 3,312 BT prints 2,210 BT prints 1,220 stations 877 BT prints 3,596 BT prints 5,233 station (punch card) 2,383 BT prints 130 stations See WDC-A Section (Exchange through WDC-A channel) 178 stations 181 BT prints See WDC-A Section (Exchange through WDC-A channel) 1,000 stations See WDC-A Section (Exchange through WDC-A channel) 4,008 BT prints 15 BT prints 33 BT prints 292 stations 7,432 BT prints 14 COST TO NODC OF SERVICES PROVIDED $270.00 200.00 165.60 110.50 49.00 44.00 180.00 250.00 119.00 15.00 25.00 9.00 75.00 200.00 1.00 2.00 12.00 372.00 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 673 TABLE 5 (CONT'D) DETAILED LIST OF DATA COUNTRY TYPE OF DATA OR AND ACTIVITY NO. OF OBS. New York Univ. 65 stations Naval Underwater Ordnance 1,408 BT prints Station Washington, Univ. of 35 stations 2,868 BT prints Rhode Island, Univ. 90 BT prints Scripps Institution of 11,092 BT prints Oceanography Texas A&M 47 BT prints Woods Hole Oceanographic 6,068 BT prints Institution EXCHANGES COST TO NODC OF SERVICES PROVIDED 2.00 70.00 1.00 143.00 5.00 555.00 2.00 303.00 INFORMATIONAL ITEMS (Non-Reimbursable) About 460 inquiries requesting small amounts of data, publications, literature data references, and general information queries were answered during the fiscal year and were provided at no cost to the requestor. This represents an increase of about 15 times the number reported for Fiscal Year 1962. Although the majority of these items concern subsurface physical oceanography, nearly all phases of the marine environment are covered. Data inquiries involving only nominal costs (under $30) are answered without reimbursement. 15 35-377 O—64—_44 674. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 DEVELOPMENT OF SYSTEMS AND PUNCH CARD FORMATS GEOLOGICAL, GEOPHYSICAL, AND BIOLOGICAL DATA The investigatory work began in FY-62 concerning possible information and data storage and retrieval systems suitable for adaptation to geological, geophysical, and biological oceanography material continued during FY-63. The status of development follows. GEOLOGICAL-GEOPHYSICAL DATA During FY-63, the geological-geophysical program developed according to guidance by the ad hoc Committee for Geological and Geophysical Data under the chairmanship of Dr. Harris B. Stewart, Jr. The committee indicated that the most valuable initial contribution of NODC would be the development of a system of recording and disseminating information on core, grab, and dredge samples taken by government and non-government institutions with emphasis on non-government sources. Accordingly, NODC submitted for final approval, a master geological station card for core, grab, and dredge data to the ad hoc Committee for Geology. We plan to complete during FY-64 detail cards for specific geological analysis to be tied into the master card. A master geophysical station card and associated specific analysis cards are being studied; it is hoped that approval of these cards can be obtained early in FY-64. Collections for a thesaurus of geological-geophysical terms for the purpose of developing a non-digital storage and retrieval system have begun but efforts in this direction will not be concentrated until digital procedures are well established. BIOLOGICAL DATA During FY-63, major oceanographic institutions were personally contacted and correspondence was exchanged with interested scientists from the United States and foreign countries with the pur- pose of establishing punch card formats for several classes of biological data. Upon receipt of comments and suggestions from the scientific community, NODC presented the following proposed cards to a specially selected ad hoc committee, chaired by Dr. Bostwick H. Ketchum, for review: Identification card (location, vessel, institution, cruise, time, etc.) Station Index card Environmental card Phytoplankton card Primary Productivity and Phytoplankton Pigment card Zooplankton card BN Oo ON ae Ore Benthos card 16 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 675 The ad hoc committee, which met on 8 March 1963, included the following: Dr. Bostwick H. Ketchum—Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (Chairman) Dr. Robert J. Menzies—Duke University Dr. John M. Sieburth—University of Rhode Island Dr. Donald F. Squires—Smithsonian Institution Dr. |. Eugene Wallen—Smithsonian Institution Mrs. Beatrice Burch—Smithsonian Institution Dr. Milner B. Schaefer—Scripps Institution of Oceanography Dr. Elbert H. Ahlstrom—Bureau of Commercial Fisheries Mr. Joseph E. King—Bureau of Commercial Fisheries Dr. O. E. Sette—Bureau of Commercial Fisheries Mr. Kenneth W. Kaye—U. S. Naval Oceanographic Office Dr. Robert Holmes—Scripps Institution of Oceanography Mr. Thomas Austin—Bureau of Commercial Fisheries Recommendations of the ad hoc committee included: 1. Development of coding instructions 2. Development of a microbiological card format as outlined by Dr. J. Sieburth 3. Development of preliminary formats for a nekton card, a systematics and biogeo- graphical card, and a bioacoustical card 4. Reconvention of the ad hoc committee to provide further guidance for the NODC biological program The NODC accomplished some work in the preparation of a thesaurus of terms to be used for the retrieval of published and unpublished sources of biological information archived in the NODC. Additionally, at the request of the Atomic Energy Commission, the NODC conducted a survey of the status and availability of radiological data pertaining to marine biota and the marine environment. 17 676 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 DEVELOPMENT OF SYSTEMS FOR PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL DATA OCEANOGRAPHIC STATION DATA Although no new systems per se were developed during FY-63, a letter was sent out on 18 January 1963 inviting certain oceanographers to serve on the NODC ad hoc Committee for Physical and Chemical Data. This committee will be asked to provide advice and guidance on such matters as ice data, current data (both surface and subsurface), surface observations, and the processing of oceanographic data from unmanned buoys. In conjunction with the International Cooperative Investigations of the Tropical Atlantic (ICITA), the NODC established an experimental communications system during the first phase (EQUALANT 1) of this program. Depth, temperature, salinity, and oxygen data were transmitted by radio ona daily basis from the Argentine research vessel: COMODORO AUGUSTO LASERRE. The messages were immediately processed and analyzed under simulated conditions of a return message containing com- pleted computed station data with precision evaluations, adequacy of sample spacing, possible station relocation, etc. The success achieved in this system has introduced a number of very interesting pos- sibilities for future investigations in oceanographic data radio transmissions. A second communication system was attempted which made use of a modified International Ship Weather Code (FM21.A, Surface Report from Ship in Full Form). The goal of this system was the production of synoptic layer depth charts. Unfortunately, due to unforeseen circumstances, only two ships were able to transmit layer depth values. AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING During FY-63, new computer programs for processing data into the NODC Oceanographic Station Card were written and are in operation. In addition to the improvements in the punched card for recording station data, several significant improvements were made to the revised IBM 7070 program. A few of these are: interpolation for additional standard depths (125, 700, 900, 1,100, 1,300, 1,400, and 1,750 meters); improved modification to the 3-point Lagrange interpolation method to eliminate ‘‘nose-outs”’ (linearly interpolates a section of the curve); sound velocity routine (Wilson's method) was revised to record values in meters/second and also to compute sound velocity starting at any observed depth (surface or subsurface). A list of computer programs in use at various oceanographic institutions was compiled with the assistance of the EPOC Committee on Machine Processing of Oceanographic Data and disseminated with the June NEWSLETTER. NODC plans to continue this computer program library service on a continuing and improved basis to facilitate communication among oceanographers of the various ADP applications and techniques developed and in use for handling data. BATHYTHERMOGRAPH (BT) DATA Work continued on the evaluation and validity of BT observational and processing procedures. A comparision was made of various BT digitization schemes as well as a comparison of sea surface BT reference temperatures measured by different instrumentation aboard the same ship. The BT card developed during Fiscal Year 1962 for the digitization of BT data was distributed to the oceanographic community for comments and final approval. These cards presently are being used at the NODC and it is hoped will be used by SIO for their digitization in FY-64. 18 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 677 PUBLICATIONS NODC Publications in print and available for distribution are as follows: Publication G-1, Introduction to the National Oceanographic Data Center Publication G-2, Oceanographic Vessels of the World Publication M-1, Conversion Tables for Use by the International Indian Ocean Expedition Publication M-2, Processing Physical and Chemical Data from Oceanographic Stations Publications in draft are as follows: Publication C-2, Catalog of BT Data, World Wide (will replace SP-12, Part IIA which is now out of print) Publication C-3, Catalog of Oceanographic Data, North Atlantic Ocean Publication C-4, Catalog of Oceanographic Data, Indian Ocean Publication C-5, Catalog of Oceanographic Data, North Pacific Ocean Publications in press are as follows: Publication G-2, Oceanographic Vessels of the World, Vol. Il Publications being reviewed are as follows: Publication C-1, Reference Sources for Oceanographic Station Data The NODC NEWSLETTER is now being forwarded to approximately 950 recipients (1,025 copies); a gain of 400 over FY-62. There has been continued favorable response to the publication. A series of Progress Reports is being formulated ‘in-house’ to summarize the more important development and analysis work, and to report on the work status for various major projects and requests placed on NODC. 678 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 IGY WORLD DATA CENTER A, OCEANOGRAPHY On 7—10 August 1962, the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC) Working Group on Data Exchange met at the NODC. Attending were: Dr. W. S. Wooster United Nations Educational and Cultural Organization/Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (UNESCO/IOC) Commodore K. P. Ryzhkoy World Data Center-B (WDC-B) Dr. P. H. Kutschenreuter World Meteorological Organization (WMO) Dr. R. R. Revelle Scientific Committee on Oceanic Research (SCOR) RADM. E. C. Stephan International Hydrographic Bureau (IHB) Dr. J. R. Rossiter Permanent Service for Mean Sea Level (PSMSL) Dr. J. W. Smed International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) Dr. W. C. Jacobs World Data Center-A (WDC-A) The Working Group prepared a Provisional Guide for Exchange of Oceanographic Data (NS/IOC/2-5(c)) which was endorsed by the 2nd Session of the IOC, Paris, 20—28 September 1962 (UNESCO/NS/180). As a result of recommendations of the Working Group and those of the earlier 20—22 June 1962 IOC Working Group meeting at NODC (WP/WDC/62-2/Final, Appendix C), the duties and responsibilities of WDC-A, Oceanography, have been increased to make it the central collection agency for oceanographic data from international programs, currently the Inter- national Indian Ocean Expedition (IIOE) and ICITA. Since WDC-A has traditionally handled only processed data for cataloguing and dissemination, the receipt and handling of unprocessed (raw) data, and coordinating the processing of these data, impose additional technical and administrative problems and workloads not heretofore budgeted. The preliminary draft of the final catalogue of data for the IGY/IGC period; i. e. July 1957— December 1959, was received from WDC-B late in December. It required six months of intensive work to verify the data holdings, edit the catalogue and prepare 216 pages of typescript copy of text, catalogue materials, charts and indices, for final photo-reproduction and printing as part of the Annals of the International Geophysical Year, Pergamon Press, London. The 10th and 11th 6-monthly catalogues of data were also completed during FY-63 and forwarded to the WDC-A Coordination Office for printing in the IGY General Report Series. The 10th 6-monthly catalogue was printed and distributed in October 1962, as IGY General Report No. 17. The 11th 6-monthly catalogue is currently in press. During the period 1 July 1962 and 31 December 1962, data for 8,225 stations were provided to WDC-B. 20 “eg RI RE NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 679 WDC-A PUBLICATIONS No. 1. Atlas of Track Charts of IGY Cruises, Part |; North Atlantic, compiled by J.R. Lumby. 46 pp., Aug. 1960. No. 2. Hydrological Observations in the Southern Oceans, compiled by Luis R. A. Capurro. 386 pp., May 1961. Oceanographic Vessels of the World, compiled by Luis R. A. Capurro, Albert M. Bargeski, and William | H. Meyers. Looseleaf, 1961. No. 3. Oceanographic Observations in the Intertropical Region of the World Ocean, compiled by Luis R. A. Capurro. Part |: Atlantic and Indian Oceans, Parts Ila and Ilb, Pacific Ocean. September 1961. No. 4. Productivity Observations in the World Ocean, Part | and Part Il, compiled by Maxwell S. Doty and Luis R. A. Capurro. 625 pp., Sept. 1961. 21 680 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS The NODC started Fiscal Year 1963 with 60 employees and completed the year with 89 full-time employees and 7 part-time employees. The ‘‘on board’’ count at the end of the year included 47 professionals, 18 technicians and scientific support personnel, and 31 administrative, clerical, and other support personnel. A request has been forwarded to the U. S. Naval Oceanographic Office for the reorganization of the Data Preparation Branch. The reorganization would permit more flexible use of personnel within the Branch and consolidate the work program under the three major subject areas of specialization. The present organization of the Branch has, from the outset, been considered a temporary arrange- ment; the two sections being incorporated in the Branch as originally approved in January of 1961. The revised arrangement should be better suited to the total obligation of NODC service to the oceanographic community. Recruitment for Oceanographers (Physical) at the GS-5 through the GS-7 level is very slow due to lack of applicants on existing registers. A more active recruitment program whereby more colleges through the mid-West and West may be contacted has been suggested and will be pursued. The NODC provided training for several foreign officers during the past year. Among this group were two Chinese officers who worked ‘‘on the job training’ for seven weeks and received private instruction pertaining to the NODC operation. Numerous briefings were provided Naval Reserve Officers and guest oceanographers. Two NODC Oceanographers were accepted for a summer course in advanced physical oceanography by Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. It is hoped that at least one oceanographer will be available to attend this excellent course each summer. The NODC provided personnel for training purposes on three survey cruises during the year under the supervision of the Naval Oceanographic Office. The NODC provided pesonnel to assist on the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries Ship GERONIMO for two different cruises during the year. One of these cruises was related to EQUALANT I. During the year, eleven oceanographers were assigned to the Civil Service Training Agreement Program for oceanographers; all successfully completed the training. Eleven summer students and several new employees (recent graduates) are participating in a 10-week (4 hours/week) orientation course to acquaint them with the oceanographic work being done by the various activities in the Washington area. During the year, four physical science technicians were reclassified as oceanographers asa result of their completing additir:nal required studies and course work to meet the qualification require- ments. Approximately 250 visitors from the civilian and Government scientific community were received during the past year. Many of these visitors are renowned scientists; no attempt was made to record the frequent ‘‘visitors’' from the local activities and laboratories who used the study room facilities (some for an hour, others for several days) to peruse, select, and otherwise use the data available. 22 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 681 FUTURE PLANS DATA OBSERVING AND RECORDING Continue development of and promote world-wide use of standard or compatible coding forms and/or cards to expedite automatic processing of data. Evaluate data output of instruments to provide advice on new instrumentation and choice of instrumentation in view of the precision of the instrument, quality of data obtained from the instrument, and the requirements to be placed on the data. COMMUNICATIONS Expand mechanisms to facilitate the acquisition of all oceanographic data. Continue data exchange with domestic organizations, international organizations, and future foreign national oceanographic data centers and promote standardization of exchange mechanisms. Continue function of WDC-A. Establish effective communication and liaison with oceanographic institutions and orga:.1zations for survey planning, survey operations, and receipt of data. DATA PROCESSING AND ANALYSIS Continue development of NODC standardized processing routines, and storage media, with special emphasis on automation of quality control techniques and integrated data reading computer systems. Investigate and develop adequacy of present-day statistical techniques in light of future observational procedures and requirements. Determine the interrelationship of the various processes controlling the marine environment. Conduct pilot studies and/or special analy ses concerning anticipated oceanographic problems of mutual interest to the oceanographic community. Using total archives and total computer capability, develop oceanographic control models (self- modifying) based on basic dynamic oceanographic controls. These will provide a field quality control service as well as NODC quality control. DATA STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL Continue development of holding-recall systems for digital and nondigital data and investigate automatic indexing and abstracting techniques. Establish oceanographic systems; e. g., a temperature system. Possible establishment of merged files for particular end products. 23 682 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 DATA DISPLAY AND REPORTS Develop automatic controls for desired data outputs or formats according to specific user requirements. Investigate and develop data display techniques; e. g., in-line or off-line devices for plotting and/or contouring. Publish a series of atlases, but give emphasis to the development of the types of charts required; e. g., quasi-isentropic charts. These will be used for in-house quality control and also for the use of the oceanographic community. Compile and reproduce lists of publications containing information relating to the marine envi- ronment; produce series of manuals on data processing techniques and catalogs of holdings; make routine distribution of summarized and analyzed products. NODC FACILITY AND SERVICES Provide specialized personnel for surveys, projects, studies, etc. Arrange for translation services, manual or automatic. Establish a computer program library. Continue and increase NODC's role in participation in National and international expeditions and foster the use of NODC as the clearing house for the National effort in oceanographic data collec- tion and the medium of exchange with other national oceanographic centers. Establish adequate library facilities integrated with the data storage-retrieval system. Respectfully submitted, Lg C W. C. Jacobs Director 1 July 1963 Approved by NODC Interagency Advisory Board at meeting of 15 July 1963 24 APPENDIX 10 U.S. OCHANOGRAPHY—A BOLD NEW VENTURE, ARTICLE APPEARING IN THE EXPLORERS JOURNAL, DECEMBER 1963, BY DR. HARRIS B. STEWART, JR., DEPUTY ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, U.S. COAST AND GEODETIC SURVEY, IN THE OFFICE OF OCEANOGRAPHY 683 yueeay ee Ree 7) nel weet tyr . *o. he, SE oe Singh ie ATM), Be Ee A Cel BRE NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 685 [Explorers Journal, December 1963] U.S. OcEANOGRAPHY—A BoLtp NEW VENTURE (By Harris B. Stewart, Jr.) While the exploration of space has been getting most of the headlines, an unacclaimed acceleration of the exploration of the world ocean has quietly been taking place. Marine science may lack the appeal to the popular press which has typified our space effort—certainly oceanography would be hard pressed to match the public excitement generated by the manned orbital flights—but those of us involved in oceanography are convinced that the future of man’s existence on this planet is inextricably linked to his globe-girding sea. Our utilization of this sea for our economic growth, for the improvement of our general welfare, and perhaps even for our continuation as a species all depends on increasing our basic under- standing of the sea, its contents, and the dynamic processes that cause the variations we can measure. But what of this increased effort in oceanography? What are we actually doing? Perhaps the best way to illustrate the accelerated tempo of our marine exploration is to list several very recent and apparently unrelated events which are in fact part of a carefully worked out plan to provide the knowledge that is needed if we are to understand the ocean in all its magnificent complexity. This past March the Soviet oceanographic ship Lomonosov rendezvoused with the Haplorer of the U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey along the Equator about midway between South America and Africa. The Soviets had planted a buoy for measuring subsurface currents, but poor visibility prevented them from getting a good position for it. The Americans stayed in the area using the Soviet buoy as a starting point for their own work in tracing the current eastward; and when the skies cleared, they obtained a good position for the buoy and radioed the position verification to the Lomonosov. This was no casual meeting of two scientific ships in midocean. It was instead part of a whole network of opera- tional plans developed at an intergovernmental meeting held the year before at the new National Oceanographic Data Center in Washington, D.C. These two ships were part of an armada of 13 oceanographic ships that were carrying out a detailed synoptic survey of the tropical Atlantic. There were ships from Argentina, Brazil, Congo (Brazzaville), Ivory Coast, U.S.S.R., and the United States all working together on a carefully worked out plan to take a simultaneous look at the structure and properties of the water masses extending across the entire stretch of ocean from Brazil to the Ivory Coast. This past spring the 2,500-ton Atlantis IT, a new oceanographic research ship, was delivered by the National Science Foundation to the Woods Hole Oceano- graphic Institution. In early July the research vessel Pillsbury, a converted Navy ship, was commissioned by the Marine Laboratory of the University of Miami, and later that same month the keel was laid for the USCGS ship Oceanographer, a 3,800-ton oceanographic ship being built from the keel up specifically for the study of the sea. This ship and her sister ship, the USCGS ship Discoverer, will be the largest oceanographic ships this country has ever built. The Navy has two new ships for marine surveys and research, the Davis and Gillis, and two more are in the early stages of construction. The Bureau of Commercial Fisheries has just recently commissioned the Albatross IV which will do oceanographic work related primarily to fisheries, the University of Rhode Island’s Graduate School of Oceanography has a converted Navy ship renamed the Trident which recently completed its maiden oceanographic voyage in the Atlantic, and new oceanographic ships are slated for other U.S. universi- ties carrying out research and teaching in the marine sciences. In early May four young American Government oceanographers journeyed to Moscow to meet for 4 days with scientists from Argentina, Brazil, Canada, France, Great Britain, Japan, and the U.S.S.R. They were meeting to report on what their respective governments had done on such topics as oceanographic data exchange, standardization and intercalibration of techniques and equip- ment for oceanography, to discuss international expeditions such as the Inter- national Indian Ocean Expedition and the International Cooperative Investiga- tions of the Tropical Atlantic, and to iron out the many difficulties that in- variably develop whenever scientists representing different governments try to work out agreements and arrangements to further governmental involvement in international endeavors. This meeting was merely a precursor to the full-scale 686 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 meeting of the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission under UNESCO scheduled to be held in Paris next June. Nothing was printed in the press about the really exciting cooperative expedi- tion in the tropical Atlantic, only the local papers picked up the stories of the various keellayings and ship commissionings, and the one small release from Paris about the Moscow meetings was totally ignored by the wire services. It is little wonder that practically no one is aware of the marine “great awakening”’ taking place in this country. Even if these various items had received the public notice they deserved, there is little chance that their relevance to an overall scheme would have been apparent. Yet there is such a scheme, and these events and many others are part of this Nation’s bold new venture in oceanography. Thus the meeting of the Lomonosov and the Heplorer in midocean, the con- struction of new ships for oceanography, and the trip of those four Americans to Moscow were all part of a well thought out and carefully planned program being put forward by the United States to insure that this Nation gets the infor- mation it so vitally needs for the full utilization of the world ocean as our last great resource on this earth. This new approach to learning about the ocean is indeed a bold new venture, but it is just getting started. The mechanisms to accomplish the task are newly formed, and scientists and governments are feel- ing their way slowly—and rightfully so. This is no endeavor to be undertaken on the ‘crash’ basis. New ships must be designed and their construction planned well in advance so that they will be able to do tomorrow’s job as well as today’s, so that they will not come off the ways any faster than men can be trained to man them and to interpret the data they bring home, and so that their continuing operating costs will not bankrupt the relatively small budget allotted this aspect of the Nation’s overall scientific effort. New facilities must be con- structed for training and research, and these must be plahned at a rate commen- surate with the demand for the people they must train. The various research activities should not in any way be controlled by a dictum of the Federal Govern- ment, for the very essence of research is the unfettered quest for knowledge, a quest that loses its challenge and with it its effectiveness when it is closely directed. But the research projects underway should have an input to the design of the survey program, the requirements of the researchers must be con- sidered in the design of new ships and in the development of new instruments and equipment, and the researchers must be apprised of work others are doing and of the overall needs of the country in the field of marine science. The Interagency Committee on Oceanography within the United States and the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission on the international level are both currently involved with the formulation of national and international programs in oceanography and with the coordination of the various elements that must work together if the task is to be accomplished successfully. However, the real excitement is in the work at sea. This has begun, but just barely. As the new ships become operational, as new facilities are built to train new scientists in oceanography, and as the research activity is stepped up, then the bold new venture will in fact be well underway. All of this may sound interesting—even if somewhat administrative—but why is the United States so concerned with developing new knowledge about the oceans that a “bold new venture” was necessitated in the first place? Probably it was the report of the National Academy of Sciences Committee on Oceanog- raphy entitled ‘“Oceanography—1960-70” that awakened this Government to our real need for an expanded program in the marine sciences. The need, how- ever, had been there for years. ‘Since the publication of the NASCO Report, as it has come to be known, much has been written on the reasons for increasing the U.S. effort in oceanography. However, most of it has appeared in budget justifications for the Federal agencies involved, in reports of congressional committee hearings, or in equally obscure publications. What little has appeared in the popular press has either been overglamorized or else slanted toward the particular aspect in which the writer had a personal interest. Perhaps the rea- sons why the United States is embarking on an accelerated effort in oceanog- raphy can be summarized most briefly as curiosity, economics, and defense. Man is an innately curious creature, and in an age of general pragmatism we often tend to downgrade sheer curiosity as a legitimate motivation for the actions of men and of nations. Certainly it is this motive, which is primary in © attracting scientists to the field of oceanography. Man has been to both poles, NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 687 has conquered Everest, and has penetrated to the remotest portions of the land. Only the oceans are left as the last great unexplored part of the earth. The fact that knowledge of the seas will be of great value to mankind is probably secondary in the minds of most oceanographers. To them the challenge is the challenge of the unknown, the lure of new discoveries, the chance to glimpse pre- viously unseen things, to learn and through learning to understand things pre- viously unknown. It is the same challenge that caused men to want to reach the poles or find a Northwest Passage, and it is the same challenge that caused their governments to support their endeavors. Bare unrationalized curiosity is indeed a valid motive for an increased program of marine exploration. But as President Kennedy said in his message to Congress in March of 1961, “Knowledge of the oceans is more than a matter of curiosity.” And indeed it is. The United States is seriously deficient in reserves of such strategic resources as manganese, cobalt, nickel, and copper. Yet we know that these very minerals are to be found in profusion as potato-shaped concretions littering parts of the ocean floor. These so-called manganese nodules have been dredged up from depths generally on the order of 1 to 2 miles, and assays of their mineral con- tent show them to be high in just these metals. The questions now are how extensive are these deposits and how do we get them up and recover the min- erals. But these are only a few of the minerals found on the ocean floom Diamonds are now being dredged from the sea floor off South Africa, a lease for the recovery of phosphorite has recently been granted off the coast of Cali- fornia, and one for the recovery of gold has been let off the mouth of an Alaskan river known to contain gold-bearing gravels. These, however, are merely ex- ploitation of minerals on or in the sea floor. Sea water itself has been described as a dilute solution of almost everything, and the definition is not too far from the truth. The salts of the sea have been recovered through evaporation since before the Christian era. More recently magnesium and bromine have been commercially extracted from sea water. More minerals are there, it is pri- marily a question of determining how they can be concentrated and recovered cheaper than they can be obtained on land. The living resources of the sea have been used since man first tasted fish and found that it was- good. But when people are dying of malnutrition anywhere on earth, the marine food resources are obviously not being adequately utilized. Man is still a hunter in the seas. It is not until he is able to pass out of the hunting stage and into the farming stage that he will be utilizing the marine food resources to the utmost. The word “aguaculture” is new to our vocabulary now, but with sufficient knowl- edge of the interrelationships between oceanic food stocks and their environ- ment, it may indeed be possible to raise fish as we now raise livestock on land. Seventy-one percent of the incoming solar radiation falls on the surface of the sea. Because we as yet know so little of the heat budget of the oceans, we know little of the quantitative role of the sea in the generation of our weather and climate. Currently weather forecasts for 2 or 3 days in advance are possible, but if the total role of the air-sea interaction in the generation of our weather were known, it is highly probable that the weather could be predicted far in advance. Perhaps we could even cause Mark Twain’s famous statement to be changed to read: “Everybody talks about the weather, and at last somebody is doing something about it.” This is not so farfetched as it at first might seem. It has been proposed, for example, that large barges carrying nuclear powered heat generators be anchored awash off the coast of California near Los Angeles. The rising moist warm air would move eastward with the prevailing westerlies, would be forced upward over the California mountains, be cooled below the dew point, and drop much needed rain on parched southern California. At the same time, the circulation generated by the rising air over the barges would pull the smog-filled air out of the Los Angeles basin leaving that city with the constant view of the Santa Ynez, San Gabriel and San Bernadino Mountains it once had. Sea bottom atomic generators could be utilized to create rising ocean currents in coastal areas. Not only would this affect the local climate, but also it would eause an upwelling of the nutrient-rich bottom waters to act as a fertilizer for the local fishing industry. Such schemes obviously cannot even be considered until we know a great deal more about the oceans than we now do. Such hot air generators or upwelling machines might do much more harm than good. The point to be made is that if we ever expect to utilize advanced ideas such as these, we must first have the basic oceanographic knowledge to predict accurately what will happen once they are put into operation. Such knowledge does not yet exist. 688 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Nature has a way of making fools of men who tamper with her without first arming themselves with knowledge of her reactions. Improvements of transportation, protection against coastal erosion, improved ship design, protection of life and property at sea, better marine navigation through better charts, protection against natural hazards such as seismic sea waves (the misnamed ‘tidal waves’), marine storms, coastal flooding, and ice- bergs, all of these things depend for their final solution on increased knowledge of the ocean and the processes that go on within it. These are mainly economic benefits that can be expected from an increased effort in oceonography. Perhaps the most apparent aspect of oceanography, and certainly the aspect eurrently capable of obtaining the most support, is that of military defense. In any conflict, the side that is most familiar with the environment in which the fighting is taking place has a decided advantage over the other. It is primarily for this reason that the Navy is supporting a strong and diversified effort in marine science. More specifically, the effort is related to hiding our submarines and finding those of a hostile power, to having our ships equipped with the best knowledge and predictions of the marine conditions they will encounter, having our naval forees utilize the sea to their advantage and to the disadvantage of any antagonist. Since any future conflict will in large part be waged over, on, and under the sea, it is imperative that the United States know more about the sea than anyone else. It is that simple and that urgent. The point to be made from all this is that man has at last come to realize the importance of knowledge of the sea to his future survival. Within the United States we have made our first attempt to establish a program whereby this knowledge will be realized effectively and efficiently. The bold new venture has in fact commenced. APPENDIX 11 MAN AND THE SEA, BY JOEL W. HEDGPETH. A SERIES OF LECTURES DELIVERED OVER KPFA, BERKELEY, CALIF., APRIL 7-138, 1964 689 35-377 O—64——45 Man and the Sea by Joel W. Hedgpeth A series of lectures delivered over KPFA, Berkeley, California, April 7 - 13, 196) Distributed by Pacific Marine Station Dillon Beach, California 691 692 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 I Marine Biology and Biological Stations On the Pacific coast of North America, from Juneau to Ensenada, there are some fifteen establishments which in one way or another are known as marine bio- logical stations. Some of these operate all year, others open their doors only in the summer time. In the North America alone there are at least 3) marine laboratories associated with Universities. What goes on at these stations? Why are they where they are--or, why do we have these institutions? These are among the many questions asked by interested visitors to marine laboratories, and the announcements that there is to be a new marine laboratory at Bodega Head and that there are plans for a biggest and best one on Catalina Island have stirred up more public interest. Sometimes there are strange notions about the work done at marine laboratories--something mysterious is being done with starfish or crabs or something like that--or the comically serious notion that rats were being raised for scientific torture in the basement at Stanfords Hopkins Marine Station at Pacific Grove, We say this rumor was comically serious because while it did Suggest some misunderstanding of the activities at Pacific Grove, the most casual inquiry would have revealed that there is no basement at Hopkins anyhow. To answer such questions as what marine biology is all about and why people work at marine stations, it seems best to go back to the beginnings with a little history of marine biology and marine stations. Marine stations, as places--usually some building or another, of course at some seaside location, are not very old. The first one was started about 1859 at Concarneau in France, and is still going. We always say that Aristotle was the first marine biologist, and of course he was, and Charles Singer, the great his- torian of science, wrote an imaginative description of Aristotle at work: N_--we see Aristotle, the first and in many ways the greatest of all naturalists, actually watching the creatures he loves. He is leaning out of a boat in the great gulf that indents the Island of Lesbos, intent on what is going on at the bottom of the shallow water. In the bright sun, and in the still, clear water of the Mediterranean every detail, every movement, can be discerned. Hour after hour he lies there, motionless, watching, absorbed, and he has left for us his imperishable account of the things that he has seen with his own eyes,” It is to be noted that Aristotle did not use a microscope; another part of the description should also be noted--undoubtedly Aristotle spent a lot of time observing -- just looking. Too often our modern biologists don't spend enough time in just looking. Marine biology -- and many other branches of biology, did not really become a serious field of inquiry until the invention of the microscope -- the first good lens systems for microscopes were invented around 1827 and it was not until a few years after that that microscopes became generally available. One of the first people to make use of such an instrument was evidently a medical inspector at Cork, Ireland, J. Vaughan Thompson. We actually do not know much about this man, other than that he was an army surgeon for many years, who was obviously at heart a naturalist. Between 1823 and 1830 Vaughan Thompson published four papers at his own expense. He worked out the life cycles of e NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 693 barnacles, crabs and hydroids -- these latter are related to sea anemones. To do this he not only used a microscope, he also used a net of fine silk towed through the water to capture the minute immature or larval forms of these or- ganisms. Thus was born the plankton net, still the indispensable apparatus for capturing the minute life of the sea. Some professional scientists did not think too highly of this work -- he was not, as the saying goes, "a man of authority". The man of authority, who got credit for devising the plankton net, was Johannes Muller, the Professor at Berlin. It was Johannes Muller who set the pattern for trips to the seashore for the study of material, and who advocated the establishment of marine stations. It is often said that Johannes Miller was one of the last great universal naturalists, who tried to keep up with every- thing and it is suspected that he died in 1858 from what we would call an over- dose of sleeping pills. Be that as it may, Mllller should be remembered for one endearing gesture -- in his later years, distressed by his doctoral dissertation, he would steal copies back from library shelves and destroy them. Vaughan Thompson was a highly competent amateur, and Muller was a marine biologist because he was a universal naturalist. The first professional marine biologist, who worked with the creatures of the sea exclusively, was Edward Forbes, the Manx naturalist who lived from 1815 to 185). His posthumously published Natural History of the European Seas was the first book on marine biology as such. At the same time a contemporary of Forbes, Philip Henry Gosse (1801-1888) published some of the first popular books on seashore life -- thus starting that type of book that has done so much to attract people of all ages and interests to the sea shore. His books set a fashion in England (and there were similar books by Frenchman and Germans) that stimulated an amateur enthusiasm that has never waned. One must remember another economic factor -- just as the microscope made many studies of seashore life possible, so the building of railroads made it possible for people to reach the shore easily -- and whet mav be more significant, return in good time to their homes with their specimens. For a while it seemed that no well ordered Victorian parlour was complete without a marine aquarium, and young gentlemen accompanied their ladies to the seashore armed with a handbook to Seaweeds or zoophytes and spent the outing learning the names for their mutual edificatiou. There wasn't much else that could be done in those innocent days, evidently. Some idea of the lengths to which this passion for seashore studies could go can be had from on George Henry Lewes, best remembered by posterity as the principal man in George Eliot's life. Im a book titled "Seaside studies at Ilfracombe, Tenby and the Scilly Isles and Jersey} published in 1858, we find this passage: "The fact is, the sea is a passion. Its fascination, like all true fascination, makes us reckless of consequences. The sea is like a woman; she lures us and we run madly after hers; she ill uses us, and we adore her; heautiful, capricious, tender and terrible! There is no satiety in this love; there never is Satiety in true affection. The sea is the first thing which meets my eyes in the morning, placidly sunning herself under my window; her many voices beckoning me, her gently heaving breast alluring me, her face beaming with unutterable delight. All through the day I wanton with her; and the last thing at night, I see the long shimmering track of light from the distant beacon asia 694 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 aire -.-° thrown across her tranquil surface -- dark now, and solemn, made more desolate by the dark and silent hulls of anchored vessels, but beautiful even in her somber and forlorn condition. I hear her mighty sighs answering the wailing night winds. She lures me to her. I cannot go to bed." ~~ acess eras ; One wonders what George Eliot thought of this passage, written a few years a after they ran off together. So much for Mr. Lewes, who was actually a rather 4 good physiologist -- he was not alone as a master of the purple passage -= for 5 as recently as a year or so ago an eminent witness before a congressional com- ; mittee described the ocean as the placental fluid of the globe. Perhaps a better g quotation to remember our Victorian fortears by is that of the Reverend Mr. - George Tugwell -- one of several reverend gentlemen who became enthusiastic iy students of seashore life and authors of books about it -- the Rev. Mr. Tugwell } remarked in his little book about the English sea anemones: "But I must add as q we stroll homeward, that one great.benefit to be derived from the pursuit of i natural history at the seaside, is the intense relief and the renewed buoyancy which it grants to a mind wearied and overtasked by the realities of daily life." a ee Who, in this time of overcrowded daily life, has stated the justification better for such an enterprise as the Pt. Reyes National Seashore? But let us get back to marine stations and their reasons for existance. The first impetus for the establishment of marine stations was the great interest in learning more about the plants and animals of the sea, many of them too delicate to be transported away from shore. The early studies soon brought forth much evidence, especially through the identification of developing stages, concerning the relationships of the major groups of animals we call phyla. Most of these major groups are best represented in the sea, and some of them like Starfishes and their relatives, occur nowhere else. From the beginning marine stations became necessary adjuncts to university training in zoology, and most of them still serve this function. Many inland institutions require the degree candidates in zoology undergo at least one exposure to seashore life, and the summer enrollment of virtually all marine stations in the United States is filled because of the demand for courses by students from all over the country. In Sweden this requirement is applied to those who wish to become high school biology teachers -- every candidate must take a course at a marine station. Perhaps we will come to this someday. But also from the beginning there was a practical motivation for marine stations as well -- the need to understand and improve fisheries and the culture of marine organisms for food. The oldest still functioning marine laboratory, that at Conecarneau, was established to study oysters. Probably the classical laboratory in the sense of pure science is that at Naples, established in 187) by Anton Dohrn, a german professor. Dohrn started his study of marine life at Helgoland, but after being nearly drowned in a storn, sought a more kindly climate. The Naples station established on an international basis, and is still essentially an international station, receiving some of its support from the United States. People go there to study particular animals and plants, or follow specific lines of study such as the function of squid nerves or the learning behavior of the octopus, and the station is still essentially an in- ternational service institution. One rents a "table" which may actually be a NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 695 small room, and makes his needs known. The scientific fishermen associated with the station usually manage to have the needed animals waiting for the investigator the next morning. One of the early fishermen for the station became so interested that he developed into a first rate specialist in his own right - Salvatore lo Bionco. A season at Naples is considered an essential part of the life of marine biologists, and there are few who have not done some research at the famous Stazione Zoologica. There is only one such station as Naples. About ten years after the establishment of Naples the English established The Laboratory at Plymouth. As to be expected, this was peculiarly British, and from its inception, was a mingling of pure and applied science, for one of the patrons was the Royal Fishmonger's Company. Until the last few years, there was no large permanent staff at Naples, but Plymouth has always had resident natural- ists, who have worked on problems of fisheries, interrelations of plants and animals in the sea and similar problems which are considered by many to be the stuff of marine biology. The Staff at Plymouth numbers 17 or 20 resident scientists at this time, exploring not only the venerable classical lines of zoology at the seasnore, but the problems of life in the sea. In 1886 the principal marine laboratory in North America was established at Woods Hole. This was actually the successor of summer seaside laboratories started by Louis Agassiz -- perhaps at the instigation of a geologist, Nathaniel Southgate Shaler, a decade or so before. Woods Hole again is a different institutition - administered by a private corporation and not directly affiliated with any single university, although students and faculty members from many universities go there during the summer. The summer population consists of hundreds of people. The rest of the year the great buildings are for the most part vnoccupied, although this last year a resident staff was added to undertake studies of the abundances and changes of marine life in the area and to continue the still incompleted task of systematics -- identifying and cataloging the kinds of animals and plants. Woods Hole has become so crowded that serious consideration has been given to the idea of a "Woods Hole of the West'', There are many advantages to the Woods Hole idea, especially the opportunity for investigators to meet and exchange ideas -- although some of them do not study marine organisms at all, but there is also some concern about the advisability of another such establishment which would have so much unoccupied space for a large part of the year. The nearest counterpart to Woods Hole on the Pacific Coast is the Friday Harbor Laboratory of the University of Washington, located on San Juan island in Pugest Sound. This is actually the second marine station to be established on the Pacific coast, founded about nine years later than the Hopkins Marine Station of Stanford University at Pacific Grove. The original idea behind this station was somewhat similar to that of Woods Hole, -- it was to be a joint enterprise of several institutions. However, it is now essentially a part of the zoology depart- ment of the University of Washington. Unfortunately its insular location has made it difficult to undertake year round operations, and it remains primarily a summer teaching and research station. Stanford's marine station, founded in 1892, is a year round station. This laboratory has a permanent staff of half a dozen investigators and has recently gone to sea in a spectacular way with the TeVega, a sort of scientific school ship for marine biologists. Currently in the Indian Ocean, TeVega carries a dozen 696 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 students who take course work en route and participate in the first hand experience of working at sea. We could go on with an itemized list of our Pacific coast marine stations, but in so doing it would be easy to lose sight of the essentials. Marine stations are where they are for several reasons -- usually the location is the best availa- ble one nearest the main base -- be it university or fisheries board -- that shows most promise of remaining in a reasonably undisturbed condition. Friday Harbor, for example, is a secluded region with many kinds of organisms and several kinds of environments - muddy, sandy and rocky bottoms, and not too remote from Seattle. It has no open, wave swept shores. Tne laboratories at Charleston Oregon and Dillon Beach were located at those localities because of the accessibility of Several basic kinds of sea and shore environments. Some laboratories, located many years ago, now find themselves surrounded by towns -- these are Hoplins, Cal Tech's lab at Corona del Mar and the great Scripps Institution of Oceanography at La Jolla. But one way or another all afford scientific access to the sea, and to as diversified suite of environments and organisms as possible. Let us return to the subject of marine biology. While each station serves a slightly differert purpose, depending on the institution that supports it and the people that sta it, all have one common aim: to gain a better understanding of the organisms and the nrocesses of the sea. It might be remarked that this does not sound very different from oceanography, but there are differences. Marine biologists at marine stations do not necessarily go to sea, and marine biological stations do not depend on large vessels, nor are they involved in major expeditions. The line cannot always be clearly drawn between marine biology and what some people regard as biological oceanography, nor should it be. But for the most part the scientific effort at marine biological stations is related to the shore and shallow sea, and to the phenomena of organisms that happen to live in the sea. They work from the shore whereas oceanographers work from the sea. There is work enough for everyone - or, we should say, questions for all. One of the principal questions is how --- and how much do the animals of the sea eat? It is not easy to examine this question on ship board, as precise measurements have to be made not only of microscopically small amounts of food material, but of the amount of oxygen consumed, and carbon dioxide give off, and so on, We have a pretty good idea how much grain it takes to produce a hog for market, or how much fertilzer we must use to grow corn in Iowa, but we know virtually nothing about such matters for the fish, crabs and mollusks of the sea which are major contributors to our fisheries, to say nothing of all the diverse inedible or un- eaten organisms along the shore. But we must understand these processes if we are to get anywhere with increasing our harvest of the sea. In recent years we have become aware that our capacity to pollute our environment has increased ten or perhaps a hundredfold in the last twenty years, and we have found detergents in fish livers at sea and radioactive isotopes in oysters far from the sources of the pollution. So we must know much more about how organisms feed in the sea and how various kinds of substances are transferred from one organism to another. Some of this work is carried on by establishments supported by such organi- zations as the United States Fish and Wildlife service, but the economic - or practical - orientation of such laboratories often allows little time for the study of problems whose immediate application to the economic problem is not apparent. It is often from disinterested or uneconomic - if we may use the word in that sense - questions that unexpectedly useful knowledge may come. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 697 A famous example of this is the study of the poisonous nature of the Portu- guese man-of-war. The French researcher Richet, who was a guest of the Prince of Monaco, was curious about the nature of this poison, and made tests on various animals. He found that sometimes there was no effect until the second test, and thereby discovered tue phenomenon of allergy -- which he called anaphylaxis. And who isn't allergic to something or another these days? This is also one of the few discoveries in marine biology to be honored on a postage stamp. The study of sea urchin eggs -- a perennial favorite for the summer habituees of Woods Hole -= and of Bodega to be, no doubt, has yielded much significant infor- mation about the fertilization process -- in fact a current school movie on sex for teen agers shows the fertilization of sea uchin eggs in lieu of the human pro- cess -- without, it must be said, making it clear that they are not watching the beginning of human babies. Somewhere in the study of sea urchin embryology may lie a Nobel prize, but in the meanwhile we have learned much about the initial stages of development from this line of inquiry. Other marine biologists study nerves of squid -- which has some of the largest of all known nerves -- giant telegraph systems that enable the animal to react swiftly, as anyone who has observed squid in an aquarium will remember. Such studies give us insight into the mechanism of nerves -- how they work. Still other marine biologists are interested in the ways by which marine and brackish water organisms -- the creatures of bays and river mouths -- can adjust their salt balance to the changing environment. As for the plants of the sea, they present many fascinating problems. We have all heard of chlorophyll, perhaps as something that is used to make green toothpaste. But there are different kinds of chlorophyll in different kinds of seaweed, wiich may have something to do with the circumstance that some kinds of seaweed grow best near high tide while others grow only beneath low tide levels. The efficiencies of these substances is a question of particular interest to those concerned with harvesting seaweeds or hoping to understand the efficiency of the plants of the sea as converters of energy. These are some of the studies that go on at marine stations. Others are concerned with the more general aspects of the plants and animals in the actual environment -- the broad field known as ecology. Surprisingly little has yet been done on the year to year changes in life along the seashore which may in turn help us understand such spectacular changes as the great sardine collapse of two decades ago, but beginnings of this sort of study have been made at Pacific Marine Station in Tomales Bay and have just been startod -t Bodega. Without such long range studies we cannot really say what the effects of man's tampering with nature may be. In these days of governmental support of science, many organizations are actively interested in supporting and fostering marine biological studies at marine Stations and university laboratories. Although its primary concern is the application of information to naval problems, the Office of Naval Research has supported many projects which might be considered pure science in addition to Supporting research on the habits of creatures that destroy pilings and docks and foul ships and buoys. The navy's interest in developing artificial breathing systems for people and submarines has led to the support of studies of respira- tion in gills in marine organisms and even such matters as how some types of jellyfish maintain gas in floats. The ability of many marine animals - shrimp, fish, and whales to produce sounds, some of which sound like machinery, is inter- 698 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 esting in their own right, is somewhat disturbing to the navy. One interesting by- product of the study of sounds is a record of the various squeaks, rattles and whistlings made by the different kinds of whales and porpoises. Yet, in spite ; of its concern for practical problems, the Office of Naval Research is one of the most enlightened supporters of research in the sea for its own sake. Research for its own sake is often called "basic research" --- perhaps it would be better to characterize it as inquiry into phenomena without a goal of immediate and ; specific practical application. } In recent years the Atomic Energy Commission has become an active supporter of such research, especially in ecology, since it has become obvious that if we | are to increase our use of radioactive materials, we need to know much more about the present environment of coastal waters in particular. One of the greatest gaps in our knowledge is that of the genetics of marine organisms -- what characters may be inherited and the mechanisms involved. A modest beginning has been made in this-field by Victor L. Loosanoff with clams, but until we know much more about the genetics of marine organisms, we are not prepared for the atomic age. Other agencies, such as the National Science Foundation and National Insti- tutes of Health, support many specific projects in marine biology. Indeed, the present support and future of marine biology seem to be ahead of the recruitment of able workers. In 1961 over 250 students were turned away from marine laboratories because there was not space enough for them, and 88 were unable to find financing to continue their studies. It is also interesting to note that more than 600 were rejected because of lack of qualification for graduate study - inadequate scholarship is probably the greatest single reason for this rejection. The many young people who have been inspired by films, television and popular articles on marine biology should ponder this unfortunate circumstance, and remember that as in all other fields, the competition is getting rougher every day. But for those who survive, there are few more rewarding careers (except perhaps in actual money) than to be the member of a staff at a marine station -- providing of course that you love the sea and the smell of the shore at low tide and the salt water gurgling gently through your laboratory. Joel W. Hedgpeth NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 699 II Oceanography Oceanography, the scientific study of the seas and of all that is in and beneath them, is comparatively recent as a formal branch of science. Although mankind has been interested in the sea since before the days of Aristotle, and Oceanographic ships have been exploring the seas now for ninety odd years, it. is only in the last twenty years that the study of the seas has become a daily way of life for so many scientists and that this endeavor has been supported on such a large scale by governments and universities. Whether or not this support is adequate for the problems that confront man in his hopes for understanding and utilizing the seas is a matter to be taken up later in this series. In any event, growth of interest in and activity in oceanography has been exponential in the past two decades. There are many reasons for this -- some of them related to the war, and the need at that time to understand waves and currents along strange tropical shores, some of them related to the increasing concern over the future of major oceanic fisheries and not least to the increasing popular interest in- spired by such inventions as the self contained diving apparatus, which some call aqua lung and others know by its unlovely acronym SCUBA --- short for self con- tained underwater breathing apparatus -- and the atomic submarines that may move about like fish, almost perpetually beneath the surface. Today, more people than ever seem to be interested in knowing something about the ocean and about the ways that it is being studied by scientists. Now and then we get the impression that some of these people think the oceanographer -- or oceanologist, as some would call him -- is a different and unique kind of scientist following a very special sort of science only slightly less mysterious than atomic physics. No one has ever defined oceanography in a way that satis- fies most oceanographers, because oceangraphy is really not a science in its own right, dealing with a limited suite of phenomena, but simply the scientific study of the ocean and its physical and biological contents. Specialists in many different disciplines are oceanographers -- mathematicians who derive equations for wave patterns or analyse tides, biologists who study the abundance and dis- tribution of plankton - the floating life of the sea - geologists who analyse the composition of the mud at the bottom, and the man who tows a sea going tape re- corder through a herd of whales to record their conversation. All these and many others are oceanographers, and some of them do not understand what the others are up to. But they all have one thing in common -- they go to sea for their data, We usually date the formal beginning of oceanography as Dec. 30 1872, when Her Majesty's Ship Challenger made her first station after leaving Portsmouth on a cruise that was to last more than three years and circumnavigate the globe.-. 1 station, incidentally, is simply a spot at which observations are made -- in this case, at Lat )1°57'N, Long 9°2'W. ‘The depth was 1125 fathoms. Nothing very re- markable was discovered as the dredge did not work quite right and came up half empty - but with enough ice cold bottom mud nevertheless to chill a bottle of champagne to drink to the success of the expedition. What did we know about the oceans in 1872 that prompted such an expedition? It must not be forgotten that this was not an expedition to chart passages and shoals and rocks for commerce, although some of that work was done, nor was it an expedition to find new lands for the Crown, for there were no unknown lands left. Nor did anyone expect to find fold, spices or other such things. This was an expedition -- and the first such -- sent out to satisfy the curiosity of man. 700 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 Exploration of the seas of course did not begin abruptly with the cruise of the Challenger -- for almost twenty years »efore 1872 British and Scandanavian naturalists had been dredging in deeper and deeper water to find strange and unknown animals. One of the greatest marine naturalists was Edward Forbes - or ) B's, as he pronounced his name. Forbes studied the waters of the Aegean Sea, but was unable to find anything on the bottom below about 300 fathoms -- 1800 feet, and postulated there was no life on the sea at depths. This of course stimulated others to go deeper and deeper. At this time, in the mid 19th century a new piece of apparatus was developed that made study of the deep sea possible -- the steam donkey engine. Fishermen were quick to adapt this engine to the hauling of larger nets. It was a successor of Forbes. C. Wyville Thomson, who became the prime mover for the study of the deepest parts of the ocean. It was his enthusiasm from the British admiralty, which made survey ships available to him -- vessels named H. M. S Lightning and Porcupine, for the study of the waters north of Scotland. It was soon apparent that some sort of life was to be found at all depths that could be reached by the bulky rope hawsers and donkey engines of the day, and further questions concerning the oceans were aroused by these preliminary studies carried out during the late 1860's. Furthermore, the advent of steam power to the fisheries greatly increased the haul of fish from the sea, and the beginning of telegraphic communication made it necessary to understand more about the nature of the bottom of the sea, across which the cables must be laid. Thus was born the Challenger expedition. Although the name of the vessel was singularly apt, it does not appear that the ship was selected because of its name, but because it was available and suitable for the purpose. The Challenger was an early version of a surplus naval vessel, so many of which are now in use as oceanographic vessels in this country. She was a steam corvette, displacing 2,300 tons, which is about equal to some of the medium sized oceanographic vessels now in use, such as the Chain at Woods Hole and the Argo of Scripps Insti- tution. Sixteen of the ships 18 68 pound guns were removed and the ship was con- verted for use of a floating laboratory. While the officers and crew were regu- lar navy, considerable care was taken to select officers with surveying experi- ence and interest in scientific matters. The Scientific staff consisted of six persons, including the director, C. Wyville Thomson, and the staff artist. Only one of this staff, the german biologist Willemoes-Suhm, had the doctor's degree. The man who was selected at the last minute after another candidate could not accept, became one of the great names in Oceanography. This was John Murray, who succeeded Wyville Thomson as direétor of the collections and studies and saw the publication of results through to a successful conclusion in 1895, twenty years after the completion of the voyage. When she returned from her long cruise in the cause of science, the Challenger was decommissioned, and ended up ingloriously as a coal barge. However, her name has been revived from time to time tor survey ships, although currently no ship by the name of Challenger is in the oceanographic register. The Challenger spent more than three years at sea, returning to England on May 2) 1876. It was a long and fruitful voyage, expecially for the scientific staff -- except for the loss of Willemoes Suhm, who died at sea. Wyville Thomson survived the expedition by several years, and the remaining young men went on to distinguished and fruitful careers -- John Murray as director of the Challenger Office in Edinburgh, J Y Buchanan the chemist as oceanographer to the Prince of Monaco (in those days the prince of Monaco was a great patron of oceanography), NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 701 and H N Moseley became Professor at Oxford. Moseley, the son of a mathematician, became an eminent zoologist and one of the founders of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. It was his son, H. G. J. Moseley who was con- Sidered one of the most promising young men of his generation -- in his twenties he determined that the properties of the atom were determined by its nuclear charge. The loss of this young man at the age of 27 in the Gallipoli campaign may have delayed the atomic age by a generation -- certainly this loss had much to do with deferment policies for men of science in the second world war. The Challenger's track included two crossings of the North Atlantic, a meandering line down the south Atlantic and across to the Cape of Good Hope, Thence to Kerguelen Island and to the edge of the Antarctic continent, north to Australia, through the East Indies, north to Japan and across the north Pacific to the Hawaiian Islands and southward to Chile, around the horn and back through the Atlantic to England. In all, the Challenger logged 68,890 nautical miles on her cruise. For some reason the Challenger did not touch any United States port. In this long cruise she made 362 official stations, lost about 28 thermometers and broke her dredging line eleven times. This is a remarkable record, not often equalled by modern research vessels. What were the questions that the men of the Challenger - and those who stayed at home - hoped to find answers for in their long exploration of the deeps? First, no one knew how deep the ocean was, or wiat was on its bottom. It was thought that perhaps the great chalk formation of the Cretaceous period was being actively formed nowadays at the bottom by the activity of organisms -- this idea was known as "the continuity of the chalk! Then it was hoped by some that the expedition would finc in the great deeps the survivors of the past -- the ere trilobites and primitive echinoderms of the paleozoic tines, and there was Bathybius, the primordial life substance, a sort of giant amoeba like creature that had been found in the sediment samples made by some of early telegraph cable survey ships. Professor Huxley had named this creature Bathybius haeckeli for his eminent German colleague and there was lively anticipation by some naturalists that this organism might be found in abundance at the bottom. Among the other questions was that concerning the nature of sea water itself -- whether it was uniform the world over, or differed from place to place. But most of all the question was --- what was on the bottom of the sea? To answer these questions the Challenger dredged the bottom by dragging a net modified from commercial fishing gear, dropped long sounding lines to the bottom, captured water from the depths and took its temperature. The Challenger found that there was life at the bottom almost everywhere, although she did not achieve the sreatest depths -- these were not dragged until 1950 or so by the Galathea - that bottom temperatures were uniformly old, and that sea water was pretty much the same everywhere. No living fossils were dis- covered - no trilobites or other now extinct forms. Bathybius was never found -- the chemist discovered that Bathybius was a colloidal precipitate of impure Sulphate of lime in sea water and bottom mud from the interaction of preserving alcohol and sediment. Thus Bathybius turned out to be an error - as Huxley re- marked, it had not fulfilled the promise of its youth. Nevertheless, as the chen- ist Buchanan said in his report on the true nature of this mysterious primordial plasm, it "should not be allowed to pass into oblivion". Like Forbes! notion of the lifeless nature of the deep sea, it was an error that stimulated thought and research. It does not necessarily follow, of course, that bad ideas are better than good ones, but sometimes a bad idea is better than none at all. Unfortu- 702 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 nately some people -- especially brash young one trying to get ahead -- get the notion that they should produce ideas and theories without foundation simply to stir things up. The lesson to be learned from the examples of the lifeless deeps and bathybius is that there was some evidence at the time for these ideas, enough evidence in fact to justify more careful investigation. One of the major contributions of the Challenger expedition was the report on the sediments -- in which the broad outlines of the deep sea deposits were determined -- and the doctrine of the continuity of the chalk also fell by the wayside. The prime result of the Challenger was the fifty large quarto volumes of reports, whose familiar green bound covers are the cornerstone of every oceanographic library. Most of these concern the life of the sea -- the animals found on the bottom =-- and at the surface. Not much was collected in between because the gear was not suitable. The other great contributions are on the chemistry of sea water and the bottom sediments. As far as these aspects of oceanography go, we have been filling in the details so broacly outlined by the Challenger reports. Little was contributed to our knowledge of the circulation of the oceans, because of lack of instruments and the necessary hydrodynamic theories on which to infer circulation from the characteristics of the water. Such theories were not developed until early in this century, primarily by Scandanavian and German oceanographers.e We are still seeking more refined answers to many of the questions raised by those who went on the Challenger expedition, but many more have occured to us as our knowledge has improved. Now we want to know how many fish there are in the sea, not as kinds, but as populations, and how much the sea can produce as compared to the land -- in terms of plant production and rate of overturn in the food cycles. When the Challenger sailed, ecology had barely begun, with the studies of the oyster banks of Helgo- land by the german fisheries biologist Karl Moebius. We often hear from our Sunday supplement literature that as our population increases we must turn more and more to the sea for food and raw materials -- but if we are to do this, we must realise how nrimitive our knowledge is. It is often stated, for example, that there is no plant activity, or no active synthesis of food in the sea below the depths to which light can penetrate. Yet we are becoming aware that this may not be quite true -- some types of plant like organisms may well be actively producing nutrient material in a different manner. We are also beginning to realise that there is a marvelously complex and interrelated group of rather small organisms in the sediments of the deep seas. The questions we now ask of the chemistry of the sea water, concern elements and substances not dreamed of by the Challenger's chemist, for now we need to know about the distribution of radium, of artificial isotopes, and other sub- stances of man's careless devising in the sea. Much more refined chemistry is needed now. Our studies of the sediments go deeper than those of the Challenger's geolo- gists, for now we sink long tubes into the mud and study the layers in these cores to gain some idea of what has gone on in the past. By method the layers of ash that fell into the Mediterranean when Pompei was buried have been identified, We are vitally concerned about ocean currents and circulation, both as an aid to understanding the populations of fishes and other creatures of the sea, and also as a necessary adjunct to controlling our potential pollution of the sea NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 703 by radioactive materials and other wast-s. While the broad outlines of oceanic circulation have been drawn since the Challenger's time, we may still have such startling discoveries before us that that of the Cromwell Current, a broad thin current flowing beneath the surface in the reverse direction across the Pacific toward the Galapagos Islands --- the existance of this current was not demon- strated until 1950, and the mechanism that drive it is still not well understood. Indeed, there was no provision for such a current in oceanographic theory. In methods and types of gear we have advanced beyond the Challenger era -- at that time wire cable had just been developed by Lord Kelvin, and was not con- sidered reliable enough -- so the Challenger used hemp lines for sounding and enormous ropes for dredging. The steam donkey engine has been replaced by electric motors. But still the operation takes time -- many hours for a dredge haul. Thermometers are better, and all sorts of electronic gadgets to measure the chemicals in sea water have been cevised. Most useful of all have been the echo sounders and similar devices that not only measure the depth beneath the ship but in some cases the thickness of the bottom sediments, producing useful geological profiles. Positioning is of course more accurate. But the prime instrument in oceanography is the oceanographer, whether he be basically a physicist, chemist, biologist or geologist, and the people that help him ashore. It has been estimated that for every researcher on ship, there should be ten ashore to work on the data. But most of these shore people are the indians of oceanography - we need them desperately, but of course most young people who want to become oceanographers want to be chiefs. Lately we have been trying to decide just what -- or who -- an oceanographer is. In these days of IBM cards and record keeping, everything must be classified properly. There is a federal register of scientific talent, and all working scientists are asked to fill out rather complicated forms for this register. Somebody converts these things to little rectangular holes on IBM cards. Recent- ly in an attempt to estimate the total number of oceanographers, these cards were fed through the machine, and about 5,000 cards fell out. There are nothing like 5,000 oceanographers, even if we count all the cooks and bottle washers. There may be 5,000 people who have something to do with things in, about or from the ocean, For example, I do not consider myself an oceanographer, but a marine biolo- gist, who happens to specialize in the study of a group of animals found only in the sea. But I have become recently involved in trying to promulgate a fool proof questionnaire that will produce only the real oceanographers, those who work actively with problems in the sea and who go to sea. So our questionnaire asks how many months have you been to sea this last year, and what research papers have you published about the sea, and so on. I am not qualified to fill out this questionnaire -- or at least I have managed to do so in such a way that I probab- ly will not be numbered among the salt water oceanographers -- this time my IBM card should fall out in the miscellaneous pile at the end. There ia a serious aspect to this attempt at classification, since the sup- port of oceanography must depend in part on the estimated roster of available people. There are probably not more than 350 or at most 500 people in the US who really ought to be considered oceanographers. Yet we have plans for adding more and more ships to the scientific fleet and some of us are not too sure that we are going to have enough oceanographers to man these ships, especially at the present rate of recruitment from universities. An oceanographer is not only a scientific sailor, he is something of a jack of at least several trades. A good many of the senior oceanographers have come 704 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 from other fields of study, carrying their special problems to the sea. Because of its three dimensional nature, the ocean presents many complications even for the simplest problem, such as going back to exactly the same place on the bottom of the sea to take a second sample of mud or worms. As a result, more knowledge of oceanic processes is expected of the next generation by those whe have le=™ned some of these things the hard way. It has been facetiously said -- but perhaps not so facetiously after all -- that present degree requirements are such that many of the people who now hold degrees in oceanography would not now be eligible for admission to graduate schools in oceanography. This is perhaps more simply understood as a result of the increasing numbers of people who want to go on to graduate school, and the correspondingly larger number of those who can meet more stringent requirements - in other words, as in many other fields, the competition is getting keener. We often get requests from students in high school, and sometimes even from grade school children, about a future in oceanography, and how to study for it. Sometimes we get inquiries from their teachers as well, who seem to want to take to sea to get out of the classroom. Often these questions include inquiries about working hours and salaries. At the outset, it should be realized that oceanography -- like any other scientific endeavor, does not observe union hours and that the principal compensation is not the salary but the privilege of doing what you really want to do and incidentally getting paid for it. As the Greek poet Oppian said so long ago of the fisherman, the oceanographer should be daring, dauntless, willing to lose sleep, and must be keen of sight, wakeful and open eyed. "He must bear well the wintry weather and the thirsty season of Sirius -- he must be fond of labor and he must love the sea." Preparation for career in oceanography is not eas -- love of the sea is not quite enough. Oceanography is such a mingling of C_..\ iui disciplines and specialities that it is necessary for an oceanographer to know a little bit about almost everything in addition to knowing a fair amount about some particular field. In other words, there is really no "major" in oceanography. A student should be basically a physicist, biologist, geologist or whatever, interested in the processes of the sea as they pertain to his central field of study. As a result virtually all institutions that offer degrees in oceanorraphy require first of all a major in a particular field, and a broad background in related fields. For example, a biology major who desires to become an oceanographer must also have laboratory courses in chemistry and physics, and at least one course in geology. All oceanographers are expected to have mathematics through calculus. Since oceanography is one of the most international of the sciences, foreign languages are essential and are becoming increasingly more so. The two preferred ones for degree candidates are Russian and German. The beginner in college should not hope -- or expect -- to start right in with the ocean. Few institutions offer undergraduate majors in marine biology, and only one -- the University of Washington -- offers an undergraduate major in oceanography. But the requirements are so many that the course is really a five year one anyhow. 4n oceanographer should begin his preparation back in high school, learning his own language -- English in our case -- mathematics and the start of his foreign languages. The best college training for oceanography -- as for any other branch of science -- is to get into the toughest undergraduate school possible, and to work hard. Although oceanography does call for a diverse background training, the diversity can be overdone. There is the sad story of the young man who tried to do everything in his undergraduate years that was hoped NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 705 for by a committee of oceanographers who published a brochure on the ideal education for an oceanographer. Unfortunately this young man overlooked the essential requirement that he have at least one solid field of specialization. As a result, when he presented himself for admission to graduate school, he was unacceptable for admission because no professor would concede that he had the background for any one subject. Perhaps the story is apocryphal -- but it does serve as a warning that diversity of knowledge must not be confused with dif- fusion of effort. Anything in excess is bad for the system -- including too much salt or water. While no one wants to discourage young people, it is only fair to remind them that many are called but few are chosen -- but if the call is strong and the response adequate, there is a good chance of being chosen. It is inevitable that our national effort in oceanography will increase, for we have barely begun to study the »%ceans and our future will depend much more on our understanding of vuhe oeans the? it will upon bringing back samples of moon duste Joel W. Hedgpeth - 35-377 O—64_—\_46 706 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 ITI The ways and means of Oceanography Public understanding of oceanography ~ what it does and how it operates - is not always in pace with popular interest in the subject. Too often, questions are asked which suggest that the questioner understands no more than that oceanog- raphy involves going out on the ocean with a boat, or down to the bottom in a bathyscaphe, or perhaps drilling a hole through the bottom of the sea. The drilling of a hole in the bottom is only incidentally related to oceanography -- if it is to be done at all, it has to be somewhere in the sea where the earth's crust is thinner, and the budget for the Mohole is separate from oceanographic bud- getse Oceanography, is more, of course than people who study the ocean, although the people are the most essential part of oceanography. Oceanography is ships, shore bases, instruments and logistics. According to the 1961 compilation called Oceanographic Vessels of the world, some 161 vessels of all types were in use as oceanographic research vessels all over the world. ‘The list was probably incomplete before it was published, and some vessels are included which can hardly be considered oceanographic in the fullest sense of the word since they are 39-0 feet long and probably seldom get very far from land. Of the 161 research vessels listed, 3 are in the United States, and only 12 are listed for the Soviet Union. According to a more recent listing of new oceanographic vessels, some 31 new vessels are now in service or will be in the next few years in the United States alone. This however includes some rather special objects, like FLIP, which is a long tube with a cabin on one end that is towed to sea and upended to form a sort of floating submerged tower to study the acustic properties of sea water, and a small two man submarine, Another 3 vessels are conversions. While there is some duplication in the lists, and some of the new ships or conversions will replace others now in service, it_ is nevertheless evident that the United States is doubling its oceanographic fleet in about ten years time or less. A good part of this increase is due to the so- called Navy Tenoc (Ten years oceanography) program. Each year the Navy is sup- plying two or more vessels, generally termed AGOR, which is short for Auxiliary General Oceanographic Research. These are not all constructed to a uniform plan, although they are usually 200 feet or more in length. ‘Some are conversions -- adaptations of existing vessels, others are new, specially ocnstructed ships. New research vessels cost between 2 and 3 million dollars to construct, and con- version of an existing ship may cost a half million dollars. Among the AGOR ships is the Eltanin, operated in Antarctic waters by the National Science Founda- tion as part of the Antarctic Research Program. The Davis, used primarily by the Navy, is based in San Francisco. Another is the Conrad, operated by Lamont Geological Observatory. ‘his is not mamed for Joseph Conrad, but for Robert Dexter Conrad, who had much to do with the Office of Naval Research in its early, formative years. Another group of large research vessels is operated by the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries of the Fish and Wildlife Service. It was the predecessor agency, the U. S. Fish Commission, which built and maintained the first vessel specifically built for the oceanographic research, the Albatross. The name is now carried by the Albatross IV at Woods Hole. A few research vessels are maintained by industries for special purposes such as testing instruments or classified research related to military contracts. In all, it is possible that by 1970 the United States alone will have an oceanographic fleet equal to the world fleet of 1960. As anyone who owns a boat -- even a fibreglass job with a trailer that is towed out to a lake on weekends -- knows, it's not the initial cost, it's the up- keep, that runs into money. The cost of oceanographic ships is high - good sized i | t NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 707 vessels cost around 1,000 to 2,500 per day at sea, and the annual ship operating budget of Scripps Institution of Oceanography alone is 2.5 million dollars. These costs include maintenance, but cost of operating ships does account for a large part of the national oceanographic budget. Yet the total budget is not very large. Just how it will work out for 196 is uncertain, but it will proba- ‘bly be around $10,000,000. This is of course the Federal budget, and includes the share of the Navy, the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries and Coast and Geodetic Survey, Atomic Energy Commission and National Science Foundation. It does not include the money from states and private industry, but this is a small fraction of the total anyhow. It is difficult to estimate the total world wide budget for oceanography, but it seems to be in the order of perhaps '!250,000, 000 per year. Even without expansion of effort, oceanography is not going to get less expensive. The cost of operating ships increases steadily -- despite the care- less statements of one local oceanographic entrepreneur, universities do not use students as crew to operate research vessels, but unionization of crews on re- Search vessels will produce difficult financial problems. Oceanographic instru- mentation is becoming more expensive as the instruments become more complicated -- or sophisticated, and we have now reached the stage where no major oceanographic institution feels properiy equipped unless it has a computer. Indeed, one of the latest major research vessels has a computer on board to process results under way. All that is now needed is an attachment that will produce the finished progress reports for distribution when the ship docks. Somebody attempted to reduce the costs of oceanography to specific details and came up with the esti- mate that each figure, such as a temperature measurement, cost about $7 a number, and a sample of sea water captured in a bottle cost $11 a fifth. Loss of gear is inevitable, and instruments must be replaced. When one remembers that oceanog- raphic vessels often must be at sea in rather rough weather (although of course observations are impossible in heavy seas), it is remarkable that no major ocea- nographic vessel has been lost at sea in the last twenty five years, and only two since 1929. The French exploring vessel Pourquoi Pas?, a veteran of Antarctic exploration, was wrecked on the shore of Iceland in 1936 with the loss of all but one of her crew, including the commander, Captain Charcot, and the non-magnetic research vessel Carnegie was destroyed in 1929 by fire in Apia harbor, Samoa, with the loss of her captain and a cabin boy. Im view of the hazards involved, the safety record of oceanography is much better than driving down the highway. The most disastrous loss to oceanography is recent years was the airplane accident in Mexico which took the lives of Townsend Cromwell and Bell Shimada while en route to join an oceanographic cruise in 1958. A few years ago a vessel from the University of Tokyo was destroyed by a volcano, with the loss of all on board, including some well known students of volcanos, but this is not a usual hazard of research vessels. The estimated world oceanographic budget of approximately 250 million a year may sound like a lot of money to some people, but it is infinitesimal along side the $5 billion approved for space projects by Congress for fiscal 6. The National Academy of Sciences committee on oceanography recommends an annual bud- get of 600 million for USA by 1970. While a large part of the oceanorraphy money may be spent for engineering and keeping ships going, a still larger percentage of our space budget is not strictly speaking science -- it is hardware. And there is no comparison of the practical benefits to be obtained by a fuller knowledge of the ocean as compared with finding whether or not there is really life on Mars. Let us say we do find that life is constructed of something other than DNA on Mars -- very interesting, but so what? We still. have to live on earth, and the ocean is the largest part of our earth. 708 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 As a distinguished British gentleman, Sir Frederick Brundett has remarked: "The World must be mad to spend more in a year on space research than has been spent in studying the oceans in the last hundred years". MY 3 TA en PS Ships, of course, are the primary capital investment of oceanography. But M4 there are also buildings, Oceanographers do not spend all their time at sea, but must process data, analyze results and prepare reports. It has been said i that for every day at sea there are ten days of work on land. Another way of ; putting this is that there should be nine or ten researchers and technicians ashore for each man at sea. This requires buildings, and one of the most strik- ing aspects of our oceanographic institutions is their crowded condition. WNo- body seems to have enough space to work in and everybody needs more buildings. Sometimes a close mingling of people has an advantage -- more ideas get exchanged. But there is some limit to this, beyond which people simply get in each other's way. Our oceanographic effort is not however, overstaffed, even if the buildings are crowded. Indeed, we are not sure where all the people are coming from to staff the vessels and the shore facilities for our expanding oceanographic fleet. Recruitment, in spite of all the public interest, is not as fast as we would like it to be. We think there are about 500 - at the most - real oceanographers in the business in the United States and the shortage is already acute in two fields -- straight physical oceanography (which ~alls for more rigorous mathematical back- ground than other phases of the field), and taxonomy -- the people who must identify all the kinds of plant: and animals found in the ocean, or at least those which are most abundant. According to one federal agency, the manpower require- ment for taxonomy is much smaller than for physical oceanography. This was evidently written by someone who did not know what he was talking about, for the identification of organisms is not amenable to computer techniques, and it has taken years to get some of the most important animals identified. Our most crit- ical need is biological oceanographers - good ones, who are specialists in various critical groups of organisms. At any rate, we have ships -- perhaps more than we need - buildings, but not enough for the people we do have in most places, and people - critically short in some fields. What are we doing with what we.have? There are two broad aspects of oceanographic effort. The first is what is known as surveys -- this is essentially similar to the mission of the Weather Bureau-continuous retaking of observations at the sea to gather data for the chang- ing environment, and to find out what is there at present. One of the great inter- national efforts of this character is currently in progress, the International In- dian Ocean Expedition. This involves ships of many nations including USA and USSR. Much of the work of the US Navy's Oceanographic Office, the Coast and Geodetic Survey ships and the Bureau of Fisheries is essentially survey in nature. This must be kept up year after year, although some aspects of it maybe processed by computers for more rapid results. Promising steps in this direction have been taken by the Navy. An adjunct to the survey function of oceanography is the National Oceanographic Data Center, where all data that can be reduced to square holes on IBM Cards is being assembled. The Soviet Union operates a similar data center, and the two are exchanging information. The other aspect of oceanography is that involving research into special phases or problems -- sometimes this involves surveys as well, but often expedi- tions are undertaken to explore special problems or phases. Some of these have NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 709 come to attention because the routine data gathering has brought out problems. So it is not always easy to separate these functions. A survey of fishery areas in the mid Pacific revealed the Cromwell Current or equatorial undercurrent run- ning against the grain, so to speak, just under the equator from west to east. An immediate result of this discovery has been not only intensified study of the oceanic region involved, but a lively reappraisal of basic oceanographic theory, since it did not have ae RL for this observed phenomenon. The inten- Sive, repeated surveys off the California coast, set in motion by the decline of the sardine, have Descente to light oceanic fluctuations still not adequately ex- plained, and provided data for a new and critical approach to the organization of groups of planktonic or floating organisms. We even have the glimmer of an idea of what may have happened to the sardines, but cannot say confidently that the "average" or "normal" conditions of the waters along the California coast are conditions of sardine abundance or sardine scarcity. It may take twenty five years of surveys and data to get an answer to that question. What oceanography should do, at least in this country, has been considered by a number of national committees. In fact, from its beginning oceanography has been organized by committees. A committee of the Royal Society determined the course and scope of the Challenger Expedition that explored the oceans from 1872 to 1876. The oldest committee that still functions is known as the Conseil Inter- nationale pour L'exploration de la Mer, a committee of representatives from various countries of northern Europe, including the Soviet Union -- Russian scientists were among the charter members in 1901. It has confined most of its interest to the North Sea and the North Atlantic, with emphasis on fisheries problems. It is now more familiarly known as ICES, from its English title, International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. In the United States the course of oceanography has been charted -- or should one say plotted -~- by two successive committees of the National Academy of Sciences. The first of these committees flourished in the decade 1927-37. As a result of its deliverations and reports, Scripps Institution was started on its way as a major center of oceanographic research and new establishment was recommended for the Atlantic Coast. Accordingly Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (not to be confused with the much older Marine Biological Laboratory there) was founded in 1931. At the present time there are four research establishments at Woods Hole, employing in all hundreds of people. It is a town whose chief industry is science. And tourists in summer time -- scientific and otherwise. The present committee on Oceanography of the National Academy, familiarly known as NASCO, was established in 1957, and is responsible for much of the stimulus that has prompted Congress and the various granting and contracting agen- cies of the Federal Government to support oceanography. ICES and NASCO are not the only committees. There is a veritable galaxy of committees, both international and in each maritime country. Attempts to coordi- nate oceanographic effort in the United States, at least in the Federal bureaus, are made through ICO, the Interagency Committee on Oceanography, not to be con- fused with I0C, the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission, and SCOR, the special Committee on Oceanic Research. Both of the latter are part of UNESCO. A recent publication of the United Nations lists some )5 committees involved in one way or another in oceanography. In spite of all the multiplicity, there is a sort of oceanography establishment. The same eminent individuals serve on several committees and shift about in a sort of game of musical chairs from one committe. meeting to another. Now and then our committees seem to get a bit 710 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 weary, and the last joint meeting of NASCO and ICO could only approve what was already decided and further recommend air-sea interface studies as the most im- portant thing yet to do. From the sense of all these meetings has come statements of the broad aims of oceanography. The ICO has surmarized these in terms of five objectives: One - to describe the distribution of physical and chemical properties of the oceans and to understand the dynamic processes which affect this distributions; two - to increase knowledge of interactions between sea and atmosphere; three - to deter- mine the kinds, distribution, adaptations and productivity of the living popula- tions of the sea and to understand the interactions of the marine organisms to each other and to the physical and chemical properties of the sea. This is to many of us the ultimate and most essential mission of oceanography, and all other objectives relate directly to it. Already the potential backlog of specimens that must be handled from our increasing oceanographic effort has resulted in the establishment of anew division of the Smithsonian Institution to sort the specimens and see that they are placed in the hands of those who will study them. The fourth objective is to describe and understand the geological, geochemical and geophysical nature of the sea floor, including its relation to the adjoining land masses. Insofar as the Mohole can be considered oceanography, it will fulfill a small part of this objective. The fifth and last major objective is to deter- mine the modification of the ocean resulting from man's activities. It is re- assuring that at the highest levels of our committee establishment this problem is recognized. Nor too many years ago the possibility that man could alter the ocean was not seriously considered at all. These objectives are carried out not only by the large government agencies such as branches of the navy, coast and geodetic survey -- and the army, which because of its charge for harbor engineering, studies beaches and harbors, and the Fish and Wildlife Service, but by universities and private research institu- tions. There are three big oceanographic institutions as such in this country, Scripps Institution (not Institute, please) at La Jolla, the Woods Hole Oceanogra- phic Institution at Woods Hole and the Institute of Marine Science at Miami. There are quite a few other oceanographic institutions and departments of univer- sities, andithere is even an oceanography department at Ann Arbor, “ichigan. The work, of course, is actually done by oceanographers and the people at the shore bases. The usual procedure is for those who actually want to do the work to propose their project. Funding is provided in one way or another, through grants or contracts. But the growing problem is that ship time eats up so much of these budgets (since usually ship time is charged against each project) that serious concern is now being expressed. It seems inevitable that ways must be found to operate ships separately from specific missions as well as developing more realistic accounting systems. One oceanographic ship operated, according to the books, 13 months in one year! In any event, the broad mission has filtered down fron the establishment, and a lesser committee somewhere has approved the project and the money. Final- ly the oceanographer can go to sea. The life of an oceanographer at sea is not much different from that of the commercial fisherman -- getting good data or observations is often as uncertain as making a good catch of fish. Nor is it always certain that instruments will work properly. Most of them do, but there is always the peril of a parted cable -- and the valuable gadget sinks to the bottom. One of the informal standard as NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 abel rules of oceanography is that you should photogranh'a new piece of apparatus be- fore you lower it in the ocean, because that is the last you may see of it. Data must be gathered at all hours of the day anc night, and sometimes the process takes most of a day. Some samples must be analyzed. immediately and others proper- ly stored for later analysis ashore. But data alone is not science, It is not enough to do something that hasn't been done before == to sail to an unknown spot on the ocean just because no one else has got there yet. The critical need in oceanography, as in all branches of science, is for keen analytical minds to make useful summaries of data and draw meaningful inferences. Without people of this sort, our national oceanographic effort can become constipated with data. So far, however, provisions for education of oceanograph- ers are the smallest part of our budgetary thinking. It is to be hoped that this will not continue to be so. : Joel W. Hedgpeth 712 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 IV The Inexhaustible Sea The title of our discourse is taken from a recent magazine article, but it illustrates an opinion about our future expectations from the ocean that many in- formed scientists view with some reservation. It is true that the seas of the world cover the greater portion of the globe and that much can be expected from them in the future. But our knowledge of the seas is only slightly less frag- mentary than that of the moon, and some of the schemes and imaginative devices proposed for obtaining resources from the ocean are only slightly less fanciful that the devices suggested for bringing a sample of moon dust back to earth, and almost as expensive. The optimism of those who speak of the inexhaustible sea had best be tem- pered by a remembrance of how we have regarded our terrestrial resources. It was not much more than 60 years ago that men still spoke of the boundless wealth and inexhaustible resources of the North American continent. Now we seem to have transferred this attitude to the sea, but we have no real justification for doing so. In short, our estimate of the inexhaustible resources of the sea is based on our lack of understanding of the sea. It is also part of man's blithe optimism that the future will always be taken care of, somehow, But the gloomy prophets of the plundered planet school (as some have disdainfully called them) are right in one essential: mankind cannot always hope that the future is assured, unless he limits his numbers so that they do not exceed the carrying eenacity of the earth. The solution to Los Angeles is not to commit all the water of the western United States to its unlimited growth, but to stop Los Angeles from growing. One of the plans for moving water to Los Angeles would be so devastating to fish life, especially what is left of the salmon, that the Fish and Game people have categorically recommended against the scheme. Thus what we propose to do on land may affect the life of the sea and our expectation of future harvest. but there is also the implicit notion that we can do almost anything we wish to our native environment, the land, as long as we have the sea to fall back on. But because we are creatures of the land, the sea *i11 always to our secondary reserve -- and what will it avail us to reduce our land to a vast denaturalized desert of houses, highways, power plants and turn to -upporting ourselves on fish meal and plankton soup -- if indeed that is possible? Man will not be able to live on fish meal alone. The eminent fisheries biologist Sir Alister Hardy has pointed out that apparently several times in the history of life on earth certain animals have been forced back into the sea to make their living. Porpoise and whale like di- nosaurs evolved, and in later epochs the mammalian whales, seals and such birds as auks and penguins evolved from terrestrial relatives. Perhaps this was due to competition for food, Sir Alister goes on to remark that man's increasing populations will force him back to the sea as well -- and he proposes a few fan- ciful devices of his own -- underwater fish herding gadgets and perfected diving apparatus that will enable us to stroll about in far deeper water than we can now reach. At any rate, it is to be noted that this return to the sea will not be the result of competition from another, more successful terrestrial mammal, but from man's own pressure of numbers. Are we justified in the comfortable notion that the sea is our ultimate safety valve? The problem was concisely put some 1800 years ago by the greek poet Oppian, NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 713 who said: But, since the sea is infinite and of unmeasured depth, many things «7e hidden, and of these dark things none that is mor- tal can tell; for small are the understanding and the strength of men. ‘the briny sea feeds net, I think, fewer herds nor lesser tribes than earth, mother of many. But whether the tale of off- spring be debatable between them both, or whether one excels the other, the gods know certainly; but we must make our reckoning by our human wits. Indeed we must, and one of the liveliest arguments among oceanographers and marine biologists is precisely the question nut by Oppian around 180 AD: does production in the sea equal or excel that on land? At least we hope that our understanding and our wit have been sharpened since Oppian's day, and we may not be too far from some sort of answer to this basic question of the productivity of the sea. In the meanwhile, populer writers and TV script artists oversimplify the problems and raise hopes whose fulfillment we cannot guarantee. Consider, for example, the following statement from a recent magazine article: "--- the sardine population dwindled, and it never recovered, be- cause by the time the environment improved in 1957, the feeding grounds has been pre-empted by a kind of anchovy that has a limited market as a food fish in the United States. Had the anchovies been fished intensively during the lean year, Cannery Row might still be thriving." There are so many oversimplifications in this statement that it is hard to know where to begin. However, it should first be pointed out that at the peak of the California sardine fishery - around 1936-39 - the greater part of the catch was not used for human food but for the production of fish meal for live- stock food and oil for industrial purposes. The same thing is happening to the herring fisheries of Europe. The peak production of California sardines has now equalled or surpassed by the menhaden fishery of the South Atlantic and Gulf states, which in 1961 accounted for about 5% of the entire fish catch of the United States and Alaska. Menhaden are used exclusively for fish meal and it is obvious that menhaden have replaced sardines in the economy, It is doubtful, should the sardines return this month, that Cannery Row could ever catch up. The State of California controls the percentages of whole fish that may be used for reduction purposes, and at this tive virtually the entire sardine -- and anchovy-catch is canned for food. 1961 was the lowest sardine pack in history. Of course, some people might say that Cannery Row is thriving again -- as a tourist trap. The most serious misstatement is perhaps the idea that had we been as fond of anchovies as of sardines as food, the fish canneries would have been able to continue at something near their peak by simply switching fish and labels on the cans. The idea that anchovies are replacing sardines is at best a hypothesis, and I am not aware that anyone who has studied the situation would be willing to Say that this was an instantaneous replacement of fish stocks, like changing the guard at Buckingham Palace. It will be interesting to see what happens if the menhaden population collapses -- what will happen then to the cammery rows of the Atlantic and Gulf coast communities? When the herring disappeared frum the 714 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 baltic in the mid 15th century, the Hanseatic league of cities that depended on them faded and the Dutch became the premier fishmongers of Europe for their turn. No one knows why the herring of the Baltic disappeared -- perhaps some change of conditions in the sea -- and they have never returned. As yet, we have no way of adjusting to these fluctuations in natural popu- lations of fishes in the sea. For example, while it is generally believed that the sardines of the California coast declined because of changes in the tempera- ture of the ocean, brought about perhaps by changes in the currents, it is also suspected that a very heavy fishery at a period of unfavorable environmental change contributed to the decline of the fish stocks. Conversely, however, we have some evidence that a fairly heavy fishery of adults during favorable years might have the reverse effect -- that is, removing the mature large fish makes it possible for the young fishes to grow faster and replace the older ones that have been removed. Whatever happens in nature, it is doubtful that major population changes are as simple as driving cattle off a range and turning sheep loose on it. Less than - hyndred years ago it was believed by many eminent authorities on fisheries prob- lems t -t the sea was so vast and the populations of fishes so immense that the efforts of man, however intense, could have no effect on the populations, It needed only a minute fraction of the population to replace the entire stock, so abundant is the spawn of most fishes. Now we have evidence concerning the extra- ordinary vulnerability of hatching and larval fish to changes in the environmert -= how a drop of a degree or so of temperature may delay hatching perhaps several days, so that the egg drifts beyond the point of no return, or hatches at a time when other creatures that would eat it are just a little larger than they should be, and thus eat more fish. These small changes apparently have a way of piling up to produce unexpectedly large effects. And we have the example of the Baltic herring to suggest that the process may not always be reversible. Mankind has had two great lessons concerning the effect of his fishing activ- ities on the stock of fishes. The bottom fish of the North Sea and waters around the British Isles had been fished intensively up to 1°1h, and the catches were dropping off, and the average size of the fish was decreasing. Fishing had gone beyond that stage in the fishery when a harvest of the old mature fish enabled the smaller and younger ones to srow up to take their place -- the whole fish- eries curve was dropping. But the war of 191-18 made fishing impossible, and imposed a closed season on the stocks of the North Sea. When fishing was resumed in 1919, the fish were more abundant and larger. But man did not learn the lesson, and by 1938 things were back to where they were in 191) -- or perhaps worse. Then World War 2 imposed another long closed season, and the stocks again im- proved. Now many nations that depend on the north sea fisheries have regulations requiring that the mesh of the nets be large enough for the smaller fish to ex- cape, but in no field of international relations is uniformity and compliance so difficult to achieve as in fishery regulations. When success is apparently attained, as in the halibut fishery of the United States and Canada, the suspicion arises in some minds that the fishery is not being regulated so mich on conservation grounds as on lines to maintain the highest price for the fish. In any event, it was impossible for the fisheries experts to be certain that the halibut was being fished to capacity in the east Bering sea grounds, so in 1963 the Americans and Canadians grudgingly opened these grounds to Japanese fishing. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 715 As we can see from the papers these days, we seem to be on the verge of some sort of crab war in the Bering sea with the Russians. More such controversies are inevitable as we increase our fisheries efforts, and it is certain that we will not be able to achieve a rational exploitation of the valuable fisheries stocks of the world ocean as long as the efforts of any one nation cannot be re- stricted. The efforts of those wke agree to conserve Antarctic whales are futile as long as other fishing nations sneak into the waters and capture whales of all species and sizes. The United States cannot piously point the finger at another nation, especially in the matter of whales, for the memorial to the great ods of sperm whales, now forever gone from the seas, is New Bedford, Massachusetts. At least we have made some modest beginnings toward the sort of international accord that must be achieved in our cooperative international oceanographic endeavours. The most striking of these is now under way, the Internaional Indian Ocean Expedition. Under the auspices of the UN, this expedition which involves the ships and scientists of many nations, has as one of its aims the increase of knowledge about the resources of the Indian Ocean, primarily for the benefit of the countries bordering on the Indian Ocean. Some of these, like India, do not have the resources in research ships and talent to undertake such studies with- out this assistance. It is difficult to predict which essential step toward greater reliance on the seas will come first -- complete international <¢cord or scientific under- standing at such a level of sophistication that we can reasonably predict fisheries stocks from year to year. One suspects the latter will come first. Yet it is a difficult task, to understand the combined effects of man and nature in the sea. One of the greatest fisheries investigations in the history of man was that under- taken along the California and Oregon coast since about 199 to find out what had happened to the sardines. As already mentioned, we are not sure how much of the change was brought about by nature and how much by man. But we suspect most of the change was due to nature. This is based partly on the analogy of such past events as the 15th century disappearance of th Baltie herring, the great tilefish catastrophe of 1882, but in particular on the cite. stance that while conditions seem to be improving for sardines and the fishing effort is minimal, the sardines are not coming back. Perhaps they will come back, but as yet we lack the information to predict if or when. We cannot even answer the question tnrat we may have this whole business the wrong way around, that actu- ally the great sardine catches of the 1930's were made during an unusual period and that the usual -- normal 2- or average state of affairs is indeed one of colder waters, stronger winds and fewer sardines. So far, at least, we have no indication of regularity in this process -- cycles of 7, 9 or 11 years or what- ever. What we do know is that the warming up of the ocean in 1957-60 is not a unique event -- something like it apparently occurred a hundrec years before. We are often asked about the warming of the ocean water, especially since this period seemed to coincide with more sharks. Perhaps it was simply that more people expose themselves to sharks these days. It is misleading to think of the ocean as warming up -- what actually happened was a shift in surface water, brought about by some change in the wind and pressure system over the entire Pacific basin. Decreased wind force reduces the upwelling of cold water near shore, and even results in somewhat higher sea level along the shore. If we try to understand the process as an actual warming up, we have to think of the amount of heat required -- something like four times the heat of the sun that actually reached the ocean in 1956-57. So evidently there was a shifting pattern in the ocean, and the sharks, out in the warmer waters away from shore all the time, 716 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 simply moved in closer. The changes we are talking about are of small magnitude as compared with the almost daily fluctuations on land -- the temperature rise in 1957-58 along central California was only about 3 degrees above the established average con- dition. The observed changes in marine life offer some evidence in support of what many naturalists have long suspected -- the life chains of the sea = from the floating diatoms to the great fish stocks are to be considered a system that is turning over at a rather high rate of speed - some of the smaller organisms have life cycles of a day or a few days, and the great blue whale, largest animal on earth, attains its full size in three or four years. But each level of the chain decreases in total mass as we proceed form the first producers to the last carnivores. There appears to be a great deal of lost energy in this system of turn over, and now and then the suggestion has been made that we should harvest our food from the lower levels -- the plankton -- instead of going to all the expense and uncertainty of catching fish. People who suggest this apparently do not realise that the plankton may be as equally spotty and uncertain. Much more practical are the suggestions for the culture of these types of organisms that we can utilize at the second step -- such animals as clams and oysters. Oyster culture is our oldest marine industry -- practiced by the Romans. But shellfish and alga culture -- such as the green Chlorella for which so much was hoped a few years ago -- must be done in bays. We have given very little heed to the use of our bays except as cloaca maxima. If we should ever want to return San Francisco bay to a condition adequate for oyster culture, we would have an almost impossible clean up job on our hands. Some of the future proposals for water to Los Angeles, which include bypassing of unsatisfactory water from farmlands and industries into San Francisco Bay would make the possi- bility even more remote. San Francisco bay is gone -- as a scene for shellfish and seaweed culture. This is a local example of what we may allow to happen on a world wide basis while at the same time we talk about increasing our food supplies. Another possibility is that we may domesticate whales and seals and a fanciful novel has been written about the great herds of whales controlled by electronic fences and of the divers that shepherd them about. It may be more practical to increase the nutrient content of shallow waters by stirring up the bottom with compressed air jets, or eliminating by chemical means some of the hordes of useless bottom animals like starfish that consume the greater part of the available food material that might instead support fish. Something along these lines has been suggested by Sir Alister Hardy, but admittedly we must be much more certain about the significance of these animals to the economy of the sea as a whole before we can proceed with confidence. Men's continuing war with the agricultural pests on land is in large part a problem of his own making -- by the intense cultivation of uniform crops he has set up attractive conditions for insects and viruses which in a state of undisturbed nature are only a small part of the system. Today we have added a new variable to the uncertainties of the sea -- radio- active waste polution. Some of our Russian colleagues are of the opinion, and they may have some evidence for this -- that any degree of disposal of radioactive waste in the sea is potentially harmful, especially if it reaches the sea at those times when fish eggs are developing. This problem needs far more intensive study than it has so far received, even in England where studies are under way in the Irish Sea around the outfall of their infamous isotope sewer at Windscale. NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 TLT We have such an isotope sewer of our own in the Columbia River, but the studies that should be made -- of the structure of fishes -- conditions of glands -- num- bers of scales -- fin rays and vertebrae -- are yet to be made. It means nothing to catch a fish and measure its radioactivity if we do not look for possible damage. To take a fishes' background count and conclude it is not affected be- cause it still swims around is misleadings we do know that fish get thyroid cancers or tumors from radioactivity. In examing the published work on the effects of radioactivity on marine organisms, one is struck by the preliminary -- progress report sort of atmosphere of these reports. When are we going to get down to some serious work on this problem? The editors of the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists may be justified in getting the hands of their clock back a few minutes, but this clock of pollution cannot be set back or halted, unless we are willing to accept our obligation to our environment more seriously than we so far done. I have discussed the biological aspects of the inexahustible sea because I am a biologist. I can say little about other hopes expressed for man's future from the oceans -- the mining of manganese nodules from the deep, or of phos- phorite from the waters around Los Angelese A large chemical corporation did take out a lease to go after this material but found that its costs estimates were off by a factor of perhaps ten, and abandoned the effort. While the difficulties may not be unsurmountable, some of the desired resources must be in much shorter supply on land than they are now to make reclamation from the sea justifiable. Our best success so far has been with evaporating salt (another ancient industry) , and obtaining magnesium from sea water. This is done on such a scale that the incidental fresh water obtained is now the principal water supply of an entire town in Texas. We have great hopes for fresh water from the sea -- or should we say Los Angeles has. But the prospect of economical fresh water from the sea is still so far off that we seriously discuss reducting most of the major rivers of this state to a shambles of dams and ditches to deliver water South of the Tehachapi. If we do manage to produce fresh water from the sea, will we tear up all these waterworks? As for many of the fanciful submarine tractors, self prepelled nets and the like that have been suggested it must be remembered that the sea is a very diffi- cult medium for machinery. It has enough salt to corrode but not enough to be a good conductor, and pressure makes it necessary to fill potentially collapsible spaces with incompressible fluids or construct heavy reinforcing against it. Most of the elaborate devices of the Sunday supplements have yet to leave the drawing boards, and the few that have been built, such as a self propelled sub- marine tractor, have been plagued with difficulties. The sea has long been a graveyard of fancy instruments. Someday, of course, our ingenuity will solve most of these problems and some of the fancy gadgets will go forth to find out how in- exhaustible the sea really is. In the meanwhile we spend our money on atomic Submarines -- how many of these things do we have now, anyway -- and on rockets to the moon. But, as one gentleman on a national scientific committee put it, it is still more essential for us to study the ocean's bottom rather than to scratch the moon's behind. A ff The netvona Research Council thinks our oceanographic budget should be 600 million by 1970; at present it is probably not more than 150 million per year and it is probable that the efforts by other countries are correspondly financed. This brings us to the final consideration in this notion concerning the inexhausti- ble sea -- we are not going to get much for nothing out of the sea. Man never has, for he has fished the sea at the peril of his life and loss of ships and gear. So far, in all the long history of fishing, we have used essentially the same gear 718 NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PROGRAM—1965 that was used 1800 years ago. When we do devise some different way of catching fish than towing nets or dropping baited hooks, we will still face the essentially inhospitable environment of the sea, and will still remember the words of that first author on fishing concerning the lot of the fisherman: But for the toilsome fishermen their labors are uncertain, and unstable as a dream is the hope that flatters their hearts. For not upon the moveless land do they labor, but always they have to encounter the chill and wildly raging water. Joel W. Hedgpeth vac ete Wes