The Naturalist in Manchuria Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2015 https://archive.org/details/naturalistinmanc23sowe Photo : by the Kodak Shop , Tientsin. Sika Stag ( Cervus viantlarinwt) in Chang Hsun’s park at Pei-tai-ho, N. China. This species is closely related to the Manchurian Sika (C. mantchuricus) , which it resembles in general appearance. The Naturalist in Manchuria, By Arthur de Carle Sowerby, F.R.G.S., F.Z.S., M.B.O.U. Author of:-"Fur and Feather in North China; “A Sportsmans Miscellany;” “Sport and Science on the Sino- Mongolian Frontier;” and joint author with Robert Sterling Clark of “Through Shen Kan.’ . . . With Photographs and Sketches by the Author. Volumes II ® III. The Mammals and Birds of Manchuria. Many a thrill Of kinship, I confess to, with the powers Called Nature : animate, inanimate. In parts or in the whole, there's something there, Man like, that somehow meets the man in me. — Browning. LIBRARY OF PRINCETON DEC G G 2007 TIENTSIN: TIENTSIN PRESS, LIMITED. 1923. THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ■r' 17822 This Book is Affectionately Dedicated To My Sisters Flora and Ada. I n troducti o n . The Natural History of Manchuria. The natural history of the wonderful region, of which pres- ent day Chinese Manchuria forms the centre, and which, for the purposes of this work, w© have called the Manchurian Region, is mainly a closed book to the nature loving British and American public * This is due to the fact that so little in the way of scientific exploration has been caiTied out in these parts by members of the Anglo-Saxon race for British or American institutions that the literature upon the subject in the English language, either popu- lar or purely scientific, is comparatively small. This does not mean, however, that the Manchurian Region has not been biologically explored. It has \ but mainly by Russian and other continental scientists, notably German, working under the auspices of the late Imperial Russian Government ; while the publications on the subject are nearly all in Russian or Ger- man. By the learned and popular writings of many eminent ex- plorers and naturalists the faunas and floras of most parts of the world have been made familiar to us. We have our classics upon the wonderful faunas of South America : the marsupial mam- malia of Australia is well-known to us, as also are the great an. thropoid apes and the multitude of antelopes of the dark con- tinent of Africa. In the country-side and along the shores of our own homel lands there is hardly a bird, beast, reptile, fish or lower form of animal life that has not been the subject of scientific discussion, or more popular writings. China, that land of biological curiosities, has from time to time yielded some new and rare species of animal or plant to de- light the heart of the scientist at home, and even to rouse the passing interest of the amateur and lay man ; but it is only within comparatively recent times that her wealth in this direction has i 11 INTRODUCTION. begun to be appreciated : when such men as the late Malcolm P. Anderson and Frank N. Meyer, as well as Wilson, Purdom, King- don Ward, La Touche, Dr. J. A. G. Smith, and others, to which company the present, writer, with all due humility, may claim to belong, have traversed the country from end to end, discover- ing large numbers of new species, and confirming by their toe- tensive collections the existence of those already described. Even so the knowledge of theii discoveries has belonged to a limited circle of biologists rather than to that by no means small section of the general public which takes an interest in scientific progress and discoveries, but whose taste for such things can only be indulged during more or less limited hours of leisure. Manchuria, however, has not received even this amount of attention from our workers. This country has suffered neglect at the hands of both British and American field naturalists, and even more so at the hands of the writers of popular natural history. The causes contributing to this state of affairs are to he sought for in the political history of Manchuria and neighbouring regions. In the first place this country was the ancestral home of the late Manchu Dynasty ; and the Ching Emperors, with all the pride and prejudice of true oriental potentates, resented the intrusion of hated aliens into the sacred home of their forefathers. But though they were successful in keeping out other European nationals, who sought entrance by way of China, they could not keep out the Russian invader in the north, who, having gained a foothold on the Amur and the coastal province of Primorskaya, as well as a political ascendency in Chinese Manchuria, was equally reseut- ful of the intrusion of inquisitive travellers, particularly those of British nationality. Even as recently as 1911 and 15, when I tried to carry out explorations in the territories under Russian rule, I was met with suspicion and unfriendliness, hampered and blocked by what ap- peared to be inimicable officialdom, watched and dogged by the police, and finally arrested as a spy. Add to such official discouragement, the abominable condi- tions of travel and the ever present danger of lawless/ bands of marauders, and it is not difficult to see why naturalists and ex- plorers, other than those under' the protection of the all powerful (at that time) Russian Government, and who had the easy means of transit offered by the great rivers of the Amur system, turned inthodtjctiox. iii their attentions to the rich and promising fields of Japan and China instead of to the Manchurian Region. But the Russian and German explorers already referred to kept entirely to the areas under Russian political control, that is to say, to the Amur and Primorsk provinces, and in these they seem to have kept mainly to the larger rivers. Th,e greater part of Chinese Manchuria, particularly the forested and mountainous areas of Kirin and Heilungkiang, remained unexplored either by them or field naturalists of other nationality till within compara- tively recent times, and, even so, large areas still remained un- visited in 1913, when I began the series of explorations, with the results of which this book deals. My object in undertaking this work was to complete as far as possible our knowledge of the fauna of the Manchurian Region, and, though concerned mainly with the unexplored areas already mentioned, I hoped in time to go over the wrhole region. The first part of my programme was carried out fairly successfully ; but the re-exploration of the Amur, Ussuri, and Primorsk regions was found impossible, owing to the political situation, which, of course, was greatly aggravated by the recent world war, the in- fluences of which were nowhere more strongly felt than in this far eastern part of the crumbling Russian Empire. As may have been gathered from the narrative of my travels and experiences in Manchuria, which form the subject matter of Volume I of this work, I made collections at the following places, which are arranged here in the order in which I visited them, and none of which have been visited by other naturalists or field col- lectors. They are : — 1. Yu-shu-ch’a, in the forested area 20 to 35 miles S.S.E. of Ch’ao-yang Chen, which lies 150 miles to the E.N.E. of Mukden on the Kirin-Fengtien border. 2. Yen-t’ung La-tzu, near the junction of the Hui-fa Ho and Sungari River, 100 miles S.S.E. of Kirin City, Kirin Province. 3. The Yalu River, 120, 150, and 180 miles from its mouth, on both the Manchurian and Corean banks. 4. The forests round I-mien-p’o, on the Chinese Eastern Railway, between Harbin and Ninguta, North Kirin Province. iv introduction. 5. The Lower Sungari River, about 120 miles below San- sing, and about 30 miles from the junction of that river with the Amur, Heilungkiang Province, and near Fu-chin Hsietn on the Kirin bank of the Sungari. These, it will be seen, form a chain of collecting stations run- ning from south to north through Central Manchuria, the very heart of the hitherto biologically unexplored region. The specimens that I collected were sent to the United States National Museum, where most of them have been identified by experts. But before going into details of my own work it would be well to survey that of the collectors and explorers who preceded me in the field, as well as of the experts who reported and published upon what they discovered. One of the very earliest explorer-naturalists in the East Siberian region whose work has bearing upon our subject was G. Wl. Steller. He visited Kamschatka and the islands of the North Pacific, and to him we owe the only clear accounts of the life history of the great northern sea-cow, often called Rhytina st.ellen after him. His explorations took place during the first half of the 18th century, while his “De bestiis marinis” and account of the sea-cow were pubished in 1751, and his work on Kamschatka in 1774. Like that of Steller the work of Peter Simon Pallas, one of the earliest explorers of Central Asia and Siberia, from about 1770 to 1801, cannot be said to deal actually with the Manchurian fauna, though it bears upon the subject very importantly. This great traveller and observer did indeed touch the northern fringe of our region, and he reached the Okhotsk Sea not far from, if not actually at the mouth of the Amur. He described a great many species of birds, beasts, fishes, reptiles, lower animals, and plants that have since been found to occur in the Amur and Man- churia Proper. Dr. A. T. von Middendorff was another Siberian explorer, who, about the year 1845, nearly a hundred years after Pallas, reached the Okhotsk Sea, and explored its southern coast and the neighbouring hinterland north of the Amur mouth. His work, re- ported upon by himself and others and published in his “Siberische Reise ,” also bears strongly upon our subject. I introduction. V In the years 1854 to 1856 Dr. Leopold von Schrenck, ably supported and assisted by R. Maack, C. Maximowicz, Ditrnar, Gerstoi'ff and Voznessenski, did splendid work in wbat he called “A.murlande,” the basin of the Amur River from its western ex- tremity to its mouth, as well as “Ussurilande,” or the valley of the Ussuri River, the South coast of the Primorsk, Sakhalin Is- land, and even parts of Yezo, and the Kuril Islands. He publish- ed the results of his investigations in a magnificent work called “ Reisen und Forschungen im Amvr-Lande, in den Jahren 1854. 1856,” but he neglected the unique opportunity presented to him of naming and describing many new species, referring, as he did, the majority of the Amur mammals, and other lower forms of animal life — since been found to be distinct — to already well- known European species. Gustav Radde, working contemporaneously with, but inde- pendently of, Schrenck, from 1855 to 1859, in Dauria, the Amur, and Ussuri, was more enterprising in this matter, and was respon- sible for the naming of a number of thoroughly good species of mammals and other animals, though he, too, seems not to have realized the significance of some of the species he came across. His work, however, appears to have been more of a botanical nature, and our present knowledge of the flora of the regions he visited is largely due to his activities. Benedikt Dybowski was another explorer-naturalist of about the same period. His work was chiefly on the reptiles and fishes of the Ussuri region and Lake Hanka, L. Taczanowski a few years later working and publishing reports upon the birds of the same region. Pierre Mari Heude, who was not an explorer or field naturalist like any of the foregoing, but who, with the aid of residents and travellers in various paits of these and other regions, founded a very useful museum in Shanghai, China, known as the Sikawei Museum, erred seriously as regards the mammalogy of Manchuria and the Ussuri in attempting to differentiate too many species. To him, however, are due the naming of a number of perfectly good species of large mammals, such as the gigantic wild boar (Sus gigas) , the goral ( Urotragus raddeanus) , the Manchurian grizzly, (Spelceus camfrons), the brown bear of these parts (TJrsus mand- 'chwricus) , and the black bear, ( Selenarctos usswricus). VI INTKODUCTION. My friend, and at one time co-worker, the late Malcolm P. Anderson, visited Sakhalin Island in 1906, in the interests of the British Museum, having already done splendid collecting work in Japan and Corea.. His mammalian specimens were reported upon, and several new species described, by Mr. Oldfield Thomas, who also described some new species from the Ussuri, as well as some from North-western Kirin, and the Khingan Mountains in Heilungkiang taken by some Japanese collectors sent there by Mr. Owston of Yokohama. The birds taken at the same time were reported upon by Mr. Collingwood Ingram. Other naturalists who in the last few decades have worked upon the natural history of the Manchurian Region are Dr. Satunin, S. J. Ognev, Mr. N. Hollister, A. M. Nikolsky, Dr. A. J. Allen, and Mr. Gerrit S. Miller, Jr. in regard to the mammals; Dr. Stejneger, Dr. A. H. Clark, Prof. S. A. Buturlin, G. I. Poliakow, and V. K. Bianchi in regard to the birds; Dr. G. A. Boulenger, Dr. L. Stejneger, and A. M. Nikolsky in regard to the reptiles and amphibians; and Dr. L. S. Berg, and P. Schmidt in regard to the fishes. The most important and comprehensive works on the natural history of the Manchurian Region are, with but one exception, in other than the English language. Excluding those of Pallas and Middendorff, the following five great works may be cited and sum- marized as forming a substantial basis for the study of our sub- ject : — 1. Reisen und F or&chungen im Amur-Lande in den Jahren 1854-1856, by Leopold von Schrenck. This deals with the mammals, birds, marine, land, and freshwater molluscs, insects ( Lepidoptera and Coleoptera), geology, mete- orology, and people of the Amur basin, including part of the Lower Sungari valley, and the Ussuri valley, Saghalin Island, and, in regard to the marine molluscs, part of Yezo. With the exception of the parts upon the Lepidoptera and Coleoptera by E. Menetries and V. de Motschulsky, respectively, which are in French, this magnificent work is in German. In regard to the sub- jects it takes up it is very complete, but, as already point- ed out, the names used for many species, have since been found to be incorrect, 60 that the work itself is somewhat out of date. INTRODUCTION. vii 2. Herpetology of Japan and Adjacent Territories, by Leon- ard Stejneger. This deals very exhaustively with the reptiles and amphibians of Japan and adjacent territories, in which is included the whole of the1 Manchurian Region. It mentions and describes in detail every species that was tion, 1907, and, of course, summarizes all previous work known to occur in these regions up to the date of publica- upon these cold-blooded vertebrates in our region. 3. Pisces Marium Orientalinm Imperii Rossici , by P. Schmidt. As its name suggests this valuable work, which is in the Russian language, deals with the fish of the Eastern Seas of the Russian Empire, in which are included the Okhotsk and Japan Seas, as well as neighbouring parts of the North-west Pacific. It gives a complete' (up to 1904) list of the fish that occur off the coasts of the Amur and Primorsk Provinces, though it does not deal with the fish of the Pe-chi-li and Liao-tung Gulfs, and Corea Bay, which must he considered as belonging to the Man- churian Region. It was published in 1904. 4. Ichthyologia Airmrensis, by L. S. Berg. This is a complete account of the fish of the whole Amur basin as known at the date of its publication in 1909. It, too, is in Russian. 5. Flora Manchurice, by V. I;. Kamarov. This consists of three volumes published in the Acta Horti Petropolitini (Vol. XX, XXII, and XXV) for the years 1901-02, 1903-04, and 1905-07, in Russian, which deal exhaustively with the flora of the whole Manchurian Region. The names and distribution of the plants are in Latin, the references in the language in which they occur, so that the book is of great value to all, even those who are not familiar with Russian. It contains, also^ a very valuable bibliography. To these five comprehensive works must be added an enormous, but very scattered, literature upon our subject, mention of the items of which will be found in the bibliographies appended to each section of the present work with which they are concerned. To understand fully the natural history of a country such as that under notice it is essential to have a clear appreciation of its viii INTRODUCTION. topogTaphy, climate, and the distribution of its forested and un- forested areas. Those who have read the previous volume of this work will have gathered all that it is necessary to know on these points ; but for the sake of those who desire only the natural his- tory of the country, and care not to follow the wanderings of the explorer, the following short account of the physiography of the Manchurian Region has been prepared. Manchuria is primarily a forest-meadow country. It is not many years since a great forest-belt stretched, almost without a break, from its south-eastern border westward up to and beyond the Kirin-Fengtien border, embracing the great range of moun- tains known as the Chang-pei Shan, south-westward down the Yalu Valley to within a comparatively short distance of its mouth, northward filling a large part of the Ussuri Valley, and in a north-westerly direction to the borders of Mongolia and Trans- baikalia, embracing almost the whole of the Sungari basin, the southern part, at least, of the Little Khingan Mountains, and the northern parts of the Great Khingan Mountains, both in Heilung- kiang Province, and a considerable part of the Amur basin north of that river. These forested areas have now been considerably reduced by the influx of settlers, but they are still very extensive in Kirin Province, the Ussuri Valley, Primorskaya, as the coastal province is called, Heilungkiang, and throughout the Amur. Extensive stretches of the Sungari River, from a few miles above Kirin Oity to its junction with the Amur, now pass through cultivated or meadow land. The Yalu has lost much of its timber, and is now only forested about its head waters. The Ussuri has a railway and many towns and villages down the whole length of its valley. The province of Fengtien is practically clear of forest, though the hills in the extreme east are well covered with vegetation. The rest is almost! entirely under cultivation. Three extensive mountain systems occur in Chinese Man- churia. These are the Ohang-pai Shan, which stretch from east to west across Southern Kirin, tapering off in the form of hills in South-easteTn Fengtien \ the Little Khingan Mountains in Eastern Heilungkiang ; and the Great Khingan Mountains running from North to South through Western Heilungkiang, Dauria, and Eastern Mongolia, to the Chinese frontier. North of the Ainur are the Bureija Mountains, which might be called a northward extension of the Little Khingan Mountains, and other ranges IMTE0DTJCT10N. IX ■which might be considered as spurs of the great east-to-west range that forms the northern rim of the Amur basin and is known as the Yablonoi and Stenavoi Mountains. Between the Ussuri and the sea is a not very high range called the Alin Shan. Of the province of Fengtien^ the western part consists of a fine, rolling, and fertile plain. The eastern and south-eastern parts, including the Liao-tung Peninsula, consist of hilly country, in places wrooded, but more often bare or covered only with low vegetation and grass. The Liao River, having its origin in Mongolia, drains the western and central areas of this province. It flows into the Liao- tung Gulf, a northern arm of the Pe-chi-li Gulf. The Yalu River rises on the southern slopes of the Old White Mountain (Lao Pai Shan), which is the highest peak of the Ch’ang-pai Shan, and, flowing in a south-westerly direction, divides South Manchuria from Corea. To its east a much smaller river, the1 Tumen, rises also in the Lao Pai Shan and divides North- eastern Corea from South-eastern Manchuria. The Yalu flows into Cbrea Bay on the west of the Corean Peninsula, and the Tu- men into the Japan Sea on the east. The Sungari River, with its tributary the Er-tao-kiang, rises on the northern slopes of the Lao Pai Shan and flows in a general northerly direction, draining the greater part of Kirin Province. Next it makes a great sweep to the west and is joined by its mighty tributary the Nonni Ho, which drains Dauria and Western Hei- lungkiang. It then turns east again, and is joined by the Mu- tan Ho, or Peone River (also called Hurka River) at San-sing. Continuing in a north-easterly direction it finally joins the Amur. The Ussuri River rises in Lake Hanka (or Chanka) in South-west Kirin, and flowing northward joins the Amur at Harborovsk. The Amur itself rises well to the west of Dauria. in the Kulun and Bori Lakes. Here it is called the Argun. It is joined by the Shilka and many other rivers that drain the Amur Province as it flows first south-east, then east, and finally north-north-east, and east, emptying itself into the Tartar Straits. Besides the lakes already mentioned there is one called Birien, or Nan-hai, on the Mu-tan Ho, and a few in the Lower Amur region. Amongst the forest clad hills and mountains of West and South Kirin are a number of small lakes occupying the craters of extinct volcanoes, or volcanic vents. Of these the largest and X INTRODUCTION. most important is, the Lung Wang Tan (Dragon Prince’s Pool), which lies in the crater of the Lao Pai Shan, itself an extinct volcano of an altitude of about 7,000 ft. above sea level. In its climate Manchuria is very different from North China, for whereas the latter may be described as dry, in spite of torrential summer1 rains, the former, except in the south and west, is de- cidedly humid. Throughout the spring frequent rains occur, fol- lowed in the summer by a, season of very' heavy down-pour. The autumn, again, is rainy ; while throughout the winter heavy falls of snow are frequent. Nevertheless, there are frequent periods of warm, bright sun- shine. The spring and autumn temperatures are mild, but in summer it becomes very hot, a temperature of 95° F. in the shade being registered as far north as the Lower Sungari Valley. Win- ter is excessively cold, zero weather prevailing for several months. In some parts, notably the North-west Kirin plains, and the north- ern parts of Heilungkiang, extraordinarily low temperatures are experienced. It will thus be seen that, except for the generally lower alti- tudes of the mountains, the country partakes very much of the nature of Alaska, or British Columbia, and scarcely at all of that of neighbouring North China, with which it has always been associated biologically1,. Indeed, the greater part of Manchuria, including in that term the Amur and Primorsk, far more closely resembles the Siberian forested and meadowed areas, which are separated from China by the howling wastes of the Gobi and East Mongolian Deserts. Under these circumstances we might well expect to find a fauna distinct from that of North China, similar in many respects to that of Kamschatka and East Siberia generally, and through them related to that of the North-western parts of the North American continent on the one hand, and Europe on the other. And this is exactly what we do find, though it must be admitted that the fauna of Manchuria is linked up with that of China bv a mingling of species, just as the two countries are linked up by a free-way along the sea coast without the intervention of any form of natural barrier. In going through the list of the Manchurian animals, espec- ially those of the Amur basin, one at once becomes aware of a sense of familiarity, which is explained by the fact that many European forms are met with. First in regard to the mammals INTRODUCTION. XI it will be found that well-known European species of bats, carnivores and rodents occur, though not so many as was given by Schrenck. Of these the hare ( Lepus timidus) , the stoat ( Alustela erminea), the pine marten (Martes martes), the wolf ( Canis lupus), the fox (Vulpes vulpes), the lynx ( Felis lynx), the wol- verine ( Gulo luscus), and the bats, Myotis daubentoni, V espertilio murinus, and V esperugo borealis, may be cited as examples. Though a good many species have been separated specifically from their European relatives, these it has been found impossible to separate. The same applies to the indigenous, or resident, bird-fauna of Manchuria, though in this case most of the forms have been separ- ated subspecifically from their European relatives, in same cases, it must be admitted, on very slender grounds. In any case they are mostly linked up with European species by intergrading forms throughout Siberia. The hazel grouse ( Tetrastes bonasia) is a good example of this. Birds of this species, but of different subspecies, occur from Europe, through Siberia, to the Amur and Manchuria. The genus is not represented in North China now, though a species is to be met with in the extreme west. The black-grouse and capercaillie are two other resident birds represented in Europe and Manchuria by very closely related subspecies. The only difference between ihe two representatives of the latter is the smaller bill of the eastern form, while it is difficult! to find any difference between those of the former. The little Tengmalm’s owl ( Crypto gla-ux tengmalmi) is another bird that shows extra- ordinarily little difference in these two exti’eme areas of its range ; while the long-eared owl (Asio otns) and the short-eared owl (A. flammeus) of the two areas are not even subspecifically separable. Other birds that bear out this affinity between the Amur and Europe are most of the members of the family Corvidce, many of the finches, the hawks and falcons, the gulls, terns, and other sea birds, and above all the numerous members of the duck family, most of those that visit our region, or pass through it during migra- tion, being identical in every way with British representatives. The ducks and other migratory species cannot, however, be con- sidered either as belonging to Manchuria, or as being fair examples of the case of relationship under discussion. XII INTRODUCTION. Turning to the cold-blooded vertebrates we meet with1 a similar distribution. The viviparous lizard ( Lacerta vivipara), the common viper ( Coluber berus) and the common frog ( Rana teuiporaria) range from Great Britain across Europe and Siberia to the Amur and Saghalin Island. Specimens taken in the last named area are absolutely inseparable from those of England. Again there exists a most remarkable relationship between the fishes of the Amur basin and those of Europe. As examples we may cite the salmonoid genus Hucho, which has a distribution extending from the Amur to the Black Sea and the Danube, and, still more remarkable, the genus of sturgeon known as Huso , which occurs only in the Amur basin and certain parts of the Caspian basin. Other species of fish that occur in both the ‘Manchurian Begion and Europe are the common carp ( Cyprinus carpio ), the common gudgeon (Gobio g. gobio ), the minnow ( Phoxinus p. phoxinns), the spinous loach ( Cobitis toenia), the burbot ( Lota lota), the lampreys ( Lampetra fluviatilis and L. planeri), and so on. Many European species are represented in these regions by subspecific forms. In the lower forms of animal life, such as the land and fresh- water molluscs and insects, we find a. still closer relationship be- tween the Manchurian and European faunas. In regard to the former Schrenck shoiwed that of the 55 species be listed as occurring in the Amur region, no less than 37 were European as well, only 10 being peculiar to the Amur, and 8 occurring also in China. Some of the 37 species have since been found specifically or sub- specifically distinct, but even so the Manchurian fauna in this respect remains overwhelmingly European in its affinities. The faunal relationships that exists between North America and Manchuria are mainly those of one part, of the' Holarctio region with another. For instance, the well known Kamschatkan wild sheep ( Ovis nivicola), though not inhabiting Chinese Manchuria, belongs to the general region. It is distinctly smaller than the giants of Siberia, Mongolia, North China, and Thibet of the 0. aunmon type, and forms a connecting link between these and the Alaskan and Bocky Mountain wild sheeps of the 0. montana group. I should not mention this genus were it not for the fact that another, and, as far as I can make out, m as yet uudescribed species of sheep occurs apparently actually within the boundaries of Manchuria. INTRODUCTION. xm I refer to a species, winch I have been assured occurs in the region of Hai-lar in the west of Heilungkiang Province, and a specimen of which I saw at Harbin. This, too, is a small sheep, distinct from the Kamschatkan form on the one hand, and the Mongolian and North China forms on the other. The Manchurian grizzly ( Speloeus cavifrons ) is an animal of peculiar interest, for not only does it form a connecting link be- tween the Manchurian and North American faunas, but it links up the North American grizzlies with the prehistoric cave bears and grizzlies of the Pyrenees and Europe generally. Its skull is very like that of Speloeus speloeus. Of the birds of Manchuria that show a relationship to those of North America the number is not so great. It is chiefly notice- able in the marine birds and birds-of-passage, or shore birds. Of purely resident forms the genus Tetrastes is represented in North America by the genus Bonasa , the ruff-grouse, a bird much like the hazel-grouse. The willow ptarmigan ( Lagopus lagopus) is represented by the same form in both areas. The owls and hawks of both areas also show dose affinities. As regards the relationship that exists between the faunas of the Manchurian Region and neighbouring North China, what strikes one most is that certain Chinese forms have invaded Man- churia, though in certain branches of animal life there exists a distinct affinity between the two countries. Chiefly is this the case with the rodents, in which we have the genera Mus Epimys (or Rattus), Apodemus , Cricetulus, Craseomys, Microtus , Myospalax, Citellus, Eutamias , Sciurus, and Sciuropterus represented in both regions by very closely allied species, or subspecies, or even by identical forms. It may be noted that the differences between the Manchurian and Chinese forms are mainly an increase in size and a darkening or intensification of colouring in the former. With the ungulates the increase in size is more apparent than the intensification of colouring, the chief examples being the roe ( Capreolus mantchuricus) , the goral ( Urotragus raddeanus), and the wild pig ( Sus gigas). Of these it will be realized at once that the goral is not a Siberian animal, but belongs more to the Chinese and Thibetan faunas. Another such animal is the black bear b Selenarctos tissuricus) which is of the Himalayan black bear type. Once more, surveying the fishes of Manchuria we note such typically Chinese species as the serpent-head ( Ophiocephalus argus , xiv INTRODUCTION. Cantor), the Chinese perch ( Siniperca chuatsi, Basil), and the peculiar cyprinid, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix, Ouv. and Yol., occurring actually within the Amur basin side by side with many species that do not occur either in, or even near the borders of, China. Nor do these Chinese species extend beyond the Amur basin into Siberia. Not only is the Manchurian fauna related to those of China, Siberia, North America, and Eluiope, but also to that of Japan by way of Saghalin Island and the Corean Peninsula. There the relationship, amongst mammals, is chiefly in the bears, weasels, bats and shrews, though there is also a distinct similarity between the rodents of the two countries. In one group or genus of crust- aceans Manchuria and Japan are specially related. This is the peculiar fresh-water crayfish Cavibaroides, which is represented only in the Amur and Sungari basins and Japan, and which differs markedly from the European and North-west American Astacus, being nearer the North-east American Cambarus. The reptiles of Japan and Manchuria are also closely related. The significance of all these facts of distribution is that the Manchurian Region — that is, Chinese Manchuria + the Amur! Primorskava — so far from representing a distinct faunal sub-region of the Palcearctic region , as suggested by Sclater, is in fact a meet- ing and mixing ground of a number of other faunal sub-regions. The reason for this intermingling of different faunas appears to lie in the fact that Manchuria lay in the path by which such forms as the goral, the black bear, the wild pig and other Asiatic or even European animals reached the Japanese Islands, and the hears, deer, and many other forms of animals, past and present, spread from Asia into North America, or from North America into Asia. This introduces us to a very wide subject indeed, and we can only touch upon it here. It is generally accepted now that a very extensive migration of animals took place, previous to Pleistocene times, between the Old and the New Worlds by way of thie land- bridge, usually called the “Miocene-Bridge,” that connected North-eastern Asia with North-western America, across what is now the Bering Sea and the northern part of the North Pacific Ocean. This land-bridge must have lasted from late Jusassio through Cretaceous, Eocene, Oligocene, and Miocene times to the Pleistocene, some time in the earlier part of which it broke down tNtkODUCTIOTT. XV and became submerged. Migrations of whole groups of animals took place : the camels, for instance, which originated in North America, used this route to enter Asia.; while the bears entered north America from Europe, via Asia, by the same means. It is only natural to suppose that with such a movement of species and groups going on, some forms wquld be left en route, settling down in suitable areas, and that a country, such as Man- churia must have been even in those remote epochs, would receive fragments of a great many different groups, especially during the various advances of the polar ice-cap during the glacial epochs. This is almost certainly how the grizzly, Spelceus cavifrons, came to occupy Manchuria, to cite but one instance. Not only did our region lie in the path of the great spread of land animals, man amongst them, from Europe to North America in pre-Pleistocene times, but it appears also to have been the coun- try by which many more recent animals, or more recently spread- ing animals, entered China from Europe and Siberia. The largest desert-belt of the Old World is that which stretches from North-west Africa right across that continent, through Arabia to Turkestan, north of Thibet to Mongolia, where, as the Gobi, it extends eastward to the very border's of Manchuria, invading the Amur basin, and almost reaching the Pacific Ocean. The Amur stops it; though north of the Pei-chi-li Gulf it is not many miles between the arid borders of Mongolia. — where such desert forms as the little jerboa, Dipus halli, Sowerby, thrive — and the sea. How long this desert belt has existed in its present continuous and unbroken form is not certain, but to-day it divides the faunas of the land masses of the Old World into two large groups, and it is only in North China, where communication by way of Man- churia has taken place, that we find any very close affinities be- tween the faunas to the south and north of it. As an example Mr. Hans Gadow’s reference to the distribution of the Old World newts may be quoted. “In the Old World the southern progress of newts has been barred by the great belt of deserts and the Mediterranean, there being none in Africa and India, but many in China, whence at least one has extended into Siam and Burmah. The oldest TTrodela occur in the Belgian Wealden, related to the American mud eel, Amphiuma • The Wanderings of Animals, p. 96, 1913 : Camb. Un. Press. XV! INTBODUCTION. As amphibians of this group occur all the way from Europe, through Siberia, into the Amur basin and Manchuria, which is connected with China by a narrow strip of non-desert land along the sea coast, it is evident that the present day Chinese forms acquired their present distribution by following this route. A mammal that has acquired a very similar distribution, though without spreading further south than North China, is the roedeer. Its range extends from Western Europe through North Central Asia and Siberia to Manchuria, thence into North Chrna and on to Thibet, where it ends. Only in North China and Eastern Thibet does it occur south of the Desert-belt. The roedeer of the Thian Shan, Sungaria, and Northern Mongolia, are separated from those of North-western Kansu and North Shansi by a wide stretch of desert, which it is highly improbable that such deer could at any time have crossed. Many more similar examples could be cited, but these will suffice to show the important part the Manchurian Region has played in the distribution of East Asiatic animals. As has already been indicated, this influx of animals from Europe, via Siberia, into China, has been met by another stream moving from China north-eastward into Siberia and Japan. The carp ( Cyprinus tarpio) may be cited as an example of an animal that has spread from China, via Siberia, to Europe. The woolly tiger ( Felis tigns longipilis). the spotted deer ( Silta ), and the black bear ( Selenarctos ussuricus) may be mentioned as animals that have spread, or are spreading, from China and India into Siberia. Since, then, the Manchurian Region is a meeting ground of several different faunal sub-regions, and as in dealing with the animal life of that country it will be necessary to make com- parisons with that of other neighbouring countries, it seems ad- visable, in order to give the reader a clear view of the subject, to define the various East Asiatic faunal subregions as they exist to-day. But before doing so I wish to make it perfectly clear that these faunal sub-regions are only for the present time, and have nothing whatever to do with the past distribution of any of the species to be studied. That were a subject altogether outside the scope of this work. introduction. XVII I am fully aware that faunal sub-regions are liable to be not only extremely artificial, but, if applied to too many different forms, extremely faulty, and that if the division otf the earth into such sub-regions is to be carried out really satisfactorily, each group of animals, often each individual genus or species, would have to be dealt with separately, not only in regard to its distribution at the present, time, but age by age throughout geological times. Nevertheless, when we have, as in the present instance, a case of a desert and steppe area, coming into contact with a fertile grassland area, as well as a semi-arid hilly or mountainous area, and a very humid forest area, we are not likely to be very much at fault in making out a number of faunal sub -regions. It will be granted at once that very often the political bound- aries of a country do not coincide with the natural ones. This is veiy much the case with Manchuria. Man refuses to be hemmed in by the natural barriers that mark the limit of range of many animals. Thus in a given country we may have a forest fauna, a barren-land fauna, an alpine fauna, or a lowland or plains fauna — according to the nature of its physiographical features — each occupying its own sphere without very much overlapping. At times, however, the stress of circumstances and the pressure of other species forces certain forms to cross the natural bound- aries, and to invade and occupy with success other less congenial areas. It is this fact that constitutes the naturalist’s greatest difficulty in determining the limits of the main faunal sub- regions in the area he is studying. Nevertheless, the task is not an impossible one, and is greatly facilitated by an accurate knowledge of the geography, configuration, vegetation, and climatic conditions of that region. Commencing with the extreme north of Eastern Asia we find truly arctic conditions, where the tundras of Northern Siberia support a very meagre indigenous, or resident, fauna. For several months the arctic night holds sway, and scarcely a living thing can survive it. There are no trees in these northerly laltitudes. A short and somewhat warm summer of perpetual day sees the advent of the birds-of-passage, many species of wild-fowl, and a certain number of passerines, who come to breed. The air rings with their myriad cries, the lakes and lagoons, swamps and marshes, peat-beds and heaths swarm with their nests — such as they are — and xviii INTRODUCTION. later with their young. A few marauding mammals occur, such as the arctic fox, but the true mammalia of these regions is a marine, or semi-marine one, characterized by the polar hear, the walrus, seals, and some of the Cetaceos. This area many be called the Arctic Faunal Sub-region. Further south, where the forests and wide meadow-land of Siberia begin, we have what may be called the Siberian Faunal Sub-region. This extends into Kamschatka, the Amur, Primorsk- aya, North-eastern Corea, and embraces North Central, and East Manchuria, as well as Northern and Noith-western Mongolia. Spreading westward it extends into Europe, but in a south-westerly direction it is gradually lost in the treeless steppes of Central Asia. Its southern boundary line in Eastern Asia is where the forests and grasslands of Northern Mongolia meet the desert sands of the Gobi. This faunal sub-region is characterized by the red-deer or wapiti, the roedeer, the musk-deer, the moose, the reindeer, the wild pig, the brown bear, the wolverine, the ermine, the wolf, the fox, the water vole, the variable hare, the hazel grouse, the black-cock, the great black woodpecker, the Siberian jay, the common viper, the viviparous lizard, the common frog, and a great many more birds, beasts, and other forms of animal life. Next comes what may be called the Mongolia Faunal Sub- region. This corresponds roughly with the Gobi Desert, Chinese Turkestan, and other C'ential Asian desert areas. Eastward it just overlaps the Manchurian political boundary, reaching to within a few miles of Harbin in North-western Kirin, and taking in a sec- tion of South-western Heilungkiang about the valley of the Nonni, and Dauria. To the south it merges into what are known as the grasslands, or T’sao-ti, of Southern Mongolia, though an arm of it extends as the Ordos Desert into China itself, and influences the faunas of Kansu, North Shensi, and West Shansi, provinces of that country. It is very easy to distinguish this desert fauna, though many of its animals are steppe and grassland inhabiting as well. The wild ass, the wild horse, the antelopes or gazelles, the; manul cat, the corsac fox, a wolf, the alactagas and three-toed jer- boas, the desert hamsters (Pliodopus) , the camel (two-humped), the brown snake (Elaphe (Hone), the toad-headed lizard ( Phrynoce - plialus frontalis ), Pallas’ sand-grouse, the Mongolian lark, and so on. All the species that belong to it are more or less tawny or sandy in their colouration. INTRODUCTION. XIX South of the Mongolian Sub-region we have the North China one. This lies to the north of the great Tsing-ling divide, which extends roughly from the Thibetan border of North Ssuchuan, or South Kansu, eastward through South Shensi into Honan, where it is lost. But it forms a very effective barrier between the North and Central Chinese faunas; though to the east of it there is a mixing of species by way of the plains of Shantung and Chihli. The North China Faunal Sub-region is represented by the large sika deer of the Cervus rnandarimis type, the thick cdated leopard ( Felts fontanieri) , the gorals, David’s squirrel (Sciurutamias davidianus) . the molerats ( Myospalax ), the hamsters ( Cricetulus ), many forms of pika or mountain hare (Ochotona) , Radde’s toad ( Bufo raddei), and many other forms. It is distinct from the Central China Sub- region in the presence of the roedeer and the absence of the muntjac and porcupine, as well as in many differences in the birds and reptiles. This faunal sub-region overlaps the Manchurian political boundary in the north-east, occupying the west, south- west and south of Fc-ngtien Province. [Wle next have the island fauna of Saghalin, the Kurils, and the Japanese Islands, which may be called the Japanese Faunal Sub-region. To this Corea belongs in part, though the fauna of that peninsula is related also to that of North China, and in the extreme north-east to that of Siberia. Thus it will be seen that there is no. such thing as a Man- churian faunal sub-region, but that different parts of the Man- churian Region must he assigned to different neighbouring sub- regions. Following is a summary of the faunal sub-regions, of which cognizance must be taken in dealing with the animals of the Man- churian Region : — • 1. Arctic faunal sub-region: Northern and North-eastern coasts and tundras of Siberia. 2. Siberian faunal sub-region : Middle and Southeam Siberia. Northern Mongolia, the Amur basin, Primorskaya, Hei- lunkiang, Kirin, the Ussuri Yalley, and North-east Corea. 3. Mongolian faunal sub-region : Gobi Desert, Eiast Mon- golia, Western Manchuria, the Ordos Desert, Chinese Turkestan, and the Central Asian Deserts. 4. North China faunal sub-region : Grasslands of South Mongolia, Kansu, North Shensi, Shansi, Honan, Chihli, XX INTRODUCTION. Shantung, Liao River basin in Fengtien, South-western and Southern Manchuria, and probably North-western Corea. 5. Thibetan faunal sub-region : Thibet and West Chinese highlands. 6. Japanese faunal sub-regiom : Saghalin, Kurils, the Japanese Islands and probably Southern Corea.. In none of these can the boundaries be sharply defined ; while it will be found that in many cases a single species occurs in several of them, but on the whole they will be found to represent fairly satisfactorily areas in which certain characteristics, or characteristic forms prevail. CONTENTS Pages. Introduction: The Natural History of Manchuria i — xx Preface : The Mammals of Manchuria xxv — xxvii Chapter I. The Bats of the Manchurian Region ... 1— 11. .. II. Hedgehogs, Moles, and Shrews 13- 25. •• III. The Woolly Tiger, Leopards, and Smaller Cats 27— 38. .. IV. Wolves, Wild Dogs, and Foxes 39- 47. •• V. The Bears of Manchuria * ... 49- 59. M VI. The Mustelines 61- 74. • • VII. The Walrus, Fur-seals, and Hair-seals 75— 84. M VIII. Whales and Dolphins 85- 95. IX. The Deer of the Manchurian Region 97—1 13. X. The Coral, Wild Sheep, and Antelopes ... 115-124. • • XI. The Wild Boar 125-131. II XII. Steller’s Sea-Cow 133-137. If XIII. The Rodents and Lagomorphs of the Man- churian Region Bibliography 139-174. 175-182. xxi List of Illustrations. Sika Stag- (Cervus Mandannus) in Chang Hsun’s park at Pei-tai-lio, N. China. Frontispiece. Two specimens of the peculiar Tadarida latouchei, Thos., collected by Mr. J. I), de La Touche at Chin-wang Tao. 10 Young Manchurian tiger (F elis tigris longipilis, Fitz.) from the C'hang-pai Shan, Kirin 30 Adult Manchurian tiger, killed in the C'hang-pai Shan and brought down in a frozen condition to Newchwang 30 Manchurian grizzly (Spelceus cavifrons, Heude) shot by the author in the I-mien-po district, N. Kirin 58 Group of Russian hunters with the author and large grizzly shot in the Kirin forest 58 The Manchurian Goral ( Urotragus raddeanus, Heude), I-mien-po district, Kirin 08 The Yellow-throated Marten (Charronia fiavigula borealis, Radde), I-mien-po district, N. Kirin 68 Young Manchurian black bear ( Selenarctos ussuricus, Heude). 100 Young Manchurian tiger 100 Horns of the Manchurian wapiti ( Cervus .zanthopygus, M.-Edw.) 100 Young Manchurian wapiti 108 The Manchurian Roedeer ( Capreolvs mantchuricus , Noak) ... 108 The Manchurian Chipmunk ( Eutamias asiaticus orientalis) ... 148 A Mongolian Marmot, taken at Hai-lar in Heilungkiang by the members of the Plague Prevention Service 148 Specimens of small mammals collected by the author in Manchuria xxii VOLUME II. MAMMALS. PREFACE The Mammals of Manchuria. As will have been gathered from remarks in the foregoing in- troduction to the Natural History of the Manchurian Region, the mammalian fauna of the latter will, on the whole, be familiar to the British, and, to a less extent, to the American, nature lover. The reader need not expect to find such extraordinary animals as the elaphure, or David’s deer ( Elaphums davidianus ), or the takin ( Budorcas ), or the great panda (/Eluropus) , which have rendered the faunas of China and Thibet so unique, though the occurrence of the goral and tiger in such northerly regions is, to say the least of it, somewhat remarkable. The Manchurian Mammalia is composed mainly of such familiar forms as the wapiti, or Asiatic red-deer, the roe, the bear the wolf, the fox, the badger, the otter, the ermine, the weasel, martens, the grey or fur-squirrel, various rats, mice, and voles, hares, the hedgehog, shrews, moles, and many northern forms of bat. But, as shown above, it contains a sprinkling of forms not usually looked upon as purely paloearctic, or perhaps it would b© better to say that savour rather of Indo-Chinese regions. It may thus be looked upon as one of more than usual interest, though it must be admitted that it is not of very great richness in the number of species it contains. The favourable conditions that prevail over the greater part of Manchuria are conducive to a great abundance of individuals, but the general uniformity of those conditions over wide areas, as well as the lack of any very great variations in altitude throughout the whole region, have militated against any very great differentiation of species, as, for instance, has undoubtedly taken place in neighbouring North China. Altogether, including the desert inhabiting forms of the west, and those invading the south-west and south from North China, XXV XXV! PREFACE. as well as those of Sakhalin, there are not mare than a little over a hundred species and subspecies of mammals in the Manchurian Region. This also includes the marine forms, such as the seals and whales, that occur in the seas that wash the Manchurian coasts. The following eight orders are represented : — Chiroptera by nine species. Insectivora by nine species. Carnivora by twenty nine species. Pinnipedia by ninei species. Cetacea by eight (or more) species. Ungulata by twelve species. Sirenia by one extinct species. Rodentia by thirty one species and subspecies Lagomorpha by four (or more) species. Of the hundred and twelve forms of mammal dealt with in this book only two can be claimed as new discoveries by the writer, who, as already explained elsewhere, made collections of these animals in various parts of Manchuria. These are a woodmouse, Apodemus praetor, described by Mi’. Gerrit S. Miller, Jr. in 1914, and a bat, Murina hvttoni fuscus, recently described by the author in the Journal of Mammalogy. Most of the forms described in the the following pages have been actually taken by the writer in Manchuria. It is probable that other species, as yet unrecorded, occur in our region. Such may be the case with the little three-toed jerboa ( Dipus lialli, Sow.) which was recently described by the author from the Chih-feng- district on the Ckinese-Mongolian frontier not far from the south-western border of Manchuria. Its range probably extends into Western Manchuria along with the alactaga, ( Alactaga mongolica), which Radde described from Dauria. It is also possible, if not probable, that some form, or forms, of lemming occur in the northern areas of our region. The following list of mammals is compiled from these collections made by the author and from various other sources, notably from the publications of Dr. Leopold von Schrenck, Gustav Radde, Captain Scammon and E. D. Cope, and, more PREFACE. XXV11 recently, Mr. Oldfield Thomas, and Mr. S. J. Ognev, and it may he taken as being as accurate as present knowledge of the subject permits. The writer’s thanks are tendered to Mr. Miller and Mr. Ned Hollister for determining the species of the specimens collected, and to Mr. Oldfield Thomas cf the British Museum, and his able assistant Mr.. M. A. 0. Hinton for their unfailing courtesy and ready assistance whenever they were needed. This opportunity may be taken to pay special tribute to Mr. Thomas’ work upon the Mammalia of Eastern Asia, as well as to that of the writer’s friend, and at one time colleague, the late Mr. Malcolm P. Anderson, who, as a field collector, was second to none, and who by his untiring energy provided Mr. Thomas with the splendid collections from which the latter has been able to name and describe so many new species from Japan, Saghalin Island, Corea, Inner Mongolia and China. In dealing with the Manchurian mammals in this book, a popular name has been ascribed to each species, as well as the most up to date classical name; while the reference to the origiual description is also added. No attempt at providing a synonomy has been made. My special thanks are due to Mrs. Doris Murphy for assistance in proof reading and indexing this volume. A. DE 0. SOWERBY. CHAPTER I. The Bats of the Manchurian Region. CHAPTER I. The Bats of the Manchurian Region. Order CHIROPTERA. Tlie first order of Mammalia tliat we have to consider is that of the hats, or Chiroptera, those little fmger-winged creatures that have so much) of mystery about them. There are many problems about the life-histories of the bats that have not yet been solved satisfactorily. There is much doubt, for instance, as to what becomes of them in winter. Do they hibernate in our northern climes, or do they migrate at the approach of winter from these colder regions where in summer they are so plentiful? There is evidence to show that some, at least, of the many forms that occur in north-temperate regions, such as Manchuria and North China, remain throughout the severe winter, to which these countries are subject, but it is equally evident, and I am fully convinced, that many, if not the majority, of species and even individuals migrate, though how far they go and to what countries remains to be ascertained. It is obvious that such questions cannot be answered in full till large series of specimens have been collected in all parts of Eastern Asia at all seasons of the year; but from what we already know il is possible to form some idea as to how they will eventually be answered, and no opportunity should be lost to record facts bearing, however remotely, upon this interesting problem. Another question which arises in connection with the study of bats is the means by which they detect the presence of their prey, hunting as they often do in the dark. Do they take the insects upon which they feed by sight, sound, or scent, or have they a sixth sense by which they detect the presence of an object without seeing, hearing, smelling or touching it To judge from their poorly developed eyes their sight must be far inferior to that of the night-flying birds, and, indeed, to that of most nocturnal mammals; but their hearing is undoubtedly extremely acute, if 3 4 THE NATURALIST IN MANCHURIA. the development of the external ear is anything by which to judge; while the width and size of their nasal cavities is such as to suggest a keen sense of smell. Nevertheless, one cannot help feeling that these senses alone, however keen they may be, are not sufficient to account for the absolute accuracy with which bats move about, pitch on to some slight projection from a wall or cliff, or seize the minute night-flying insects upon which they feed. This leads us to speculate upon the function of the wonderful membranous growth that some bats have upon their facea. Is it a sense organ, and if so why have not all bats got it? One is almost inclined to believe that this delicate and apparently sensitive membranous tissue is capabable of receiving impressions of some sort, about which the human being knows nothing. Then the thought of the very kinship, so to speak, between man and bats suggests another problem. At what stage in the history of qur evolution did the bats branch off from the main stem, and commence to follow the line of development that led them to the wonderful state of perfection in flight they now enjoy ? Here we must look to the paleontologist for an answer, and doubtless in time shall receive it, just as in time the mammalogist by the steady accumulation of facts will be able to answer the other questions and problems already raised. Meanwhile, let us leave the realm of speculation and turn to investigate such facts as we have within our reach concerning the bats of our region, which, after all, may prove more profitable than propounding problems which we cannot as yet answer. The bats of the Manchurian Eegion are not as well known as are the other branches of Mammalia represented in the country, and though we may safely say that some nine specie's and sub- species occur thlere, it is almost certain that our list is not complete. For instance a number of forms have been recorded from the Peking area of Chihli, and it is extremely likely that they also occur in South-western M'anchuria at least, though up to the present there are no records of this. These are the Japanese horse- shoe hat ( Rhinolophus ferrum-equinum nippon), the Chinese repre- sentative of Schreibers’ bat ( Miniopterus sclireibersi chinensis) and the Peking myotis (Myotis pequinivs). It is also probable that some form of serotine ( Eptesicvs serotinus) occurs at least in South Manchuria. THE BATS OF THE MANCHURIAN REGION. 5 Ou tke other hand some of the records -we already have are doubtful : especially is this the case with those of Leopold von Schrenck, who gave the names of European species to many of the mammals he recorded, most of which have since been found to be distinct. Schrenck recorded the following four forms : V espertilio mystacinus , Leisl., Vespertilio daubentonii , Leisl., V esperugo (V esperus) borealis, Nilss., and Plecotus auritus, L., all from the* Amur region. Mr. Oldfield Thomas records Myotis mystacinus from Saghalin Island, and V espertilio murinus from Northern Kirin; while S. J. Ognev, a Russian naturalist, describes Murina ussuriensis , and Myotis ikonnikovi, and records Murina hilgendarfi, Vespertilio murinus, and Plecotus auritus sacrimontis from the Ussuri region. In the course of my explorations I secured specimens of three different forms, which have been referred to Myotis ikonnikovi, V espertilio murinus, and a form of Murina related to ill. huttoni of India, and which I have described under the name M. huttoni fuscus. Recently Mr. Thomas has described Tadarida latouchei from Chin-wang Tao, close to the south-western border of Manchuria, where Mr. J. D. de La Touche secured the only two known speci- mens of this interesting species. In the following list of bats, with descriptions and remarks, I am giving my reasons for including each form as I come to it, so need not do so here. Family Vespertiljonid.e. All the bats hitherto recorded from Manchuria belong to the family Vespertilionidce, or typical bats. 1. Ussurian Mouse-eared Bat. Myotis ikonnikovi, Ognev. Myotis ikonnikovi, Oknev, Ann. Mus. Zool. Acad. Imp. Sci. St. Petersburg, Yol. XYI, pp. 475-611 (1911) 1912. The type locality of this pretty little bat is Evseevka, near Lake Hanka, in the Imanski District of the Primorsk, and it would appear to be Schrenck’s V espertilio mystacinus and Thomas’ Myotis mystacinus , Ognev having separated it from the European form. My discovery of this species in North Kirin was a matter of some importance, for Mr. Miller, to whom I sent a specimen, wrote me on receiving it that he had been in doubt as to the distinctness of that form from the European M. mystacinus, but that my specimen established its genuineness beyond a doubt. 6 THE NATURALIST IN MANCHURIA. It seems probable that this is the form that occupies these regions and not M. mystacinus , for which reason the latter is left out of our list. Our present species agrees in size with its European congener. The head and body together measure not mort than 50 mm. It is of a sooty-brown colour above, lighter below. There is no> nose- leaf, the face being plain. It frequents the open glades in the forested area, as well as the river and stream sides in the open country, where it feeds upon the flies, mosquitoes and gnats that abound. It is probably a migratory species. It was while camped in the swamps near Samafalo, (I-mien- p’o District) that I secured the specimens referred to above. The little animals used to hover about over my companion’s and my heads at night, evidently attracted by the mosquitoes that swarmed about us. These were the only specimens I secured, but I am certain that some of the smaller bats I saw in other areas belong- ed to this species. It is probably fairly common throughout Manchuria. 2. Daubenton’s Bat. Myotis daubentoni , (Leisl.) Vespertilio daubentonu, Leisl., Kuhl., Deuts. Elederm : Ann. Wett. Ges. Naturk., 1899, p. 51. This species of bat was recorded by Schrenck from the Amur, and so may be included in the Mammalia of the Manchurian llegion. I am unaware of its having been recorded by any other observer in these parts. Daubenton’s bat is commonly to be found hovering over water, where, apparently, it seeks its food. It has the upper parts smoky-brown, under parts lighter, and lacks the long hairs on the face of M. mystacinus. It is a small species like the foregoing. 3. Mouse-like Vespertilio. Vespertilio murinus ScLreb. V espertilia murinus Schreb, Saiig., I, 1775, p. 165, pi. LI. I secured a specimen of this bat at the shore farm (Oakwood Farm), near Fu-chin Ilsien on the Lower Sungari lliver. Thomas recorded it from the Ch’ang Ch’un area to the south and west of THE BATS OF THE MANCHURIAN REGION. 7 this point in North Kirin in 1909 (Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 8. Vol. 4. p. 500 Dec. 1909.), remarking at the time that his specimen was small like the European form, and not large like the Chinese form V. m. superans Thos. Bearing upon this point, I have a, letter in which Mr. Miller says that some specimens which I sent him from Tientsin (Chihli, N. China) are nearer the European form than the subspecies superans, which was described from Kuatun in Fukien (S. E. China). The main characteristic that separates F. m. superans from the European V. murinus is its greater size. In colour the two are identical. My Tientsin speci- mens, however, as Mr. Miller notices, are darker below than in any specimens of the European form in the Smithsonian Institution collections. Also they are intermediate in the length of the fore- arm between murinus and superans. My specimen fiom Man- churia was found to be identical with true murinus. Thus it would seem that there are three forms in Eastern Asia., namely, the European form, V. murinus, occupying the Manchurian Region, the Kuatun form, V. m. superans, occupying South- eastern China, and a hitherto unnamed intermediate form occupy- ing North China. This would suggest that these species and sub- species are non-migratory, and in support of this I may state that I have secured specimens in Tientsin in mid-winter, that were sheltering in the eaves and roofs of houses. Again there is no doubt that at least one species of bat spends the winter in Man- churia, often living in the dwellings of the local human inhabit- ants, and I am inclined to the belief that it is Vespertilio that thus shelters with man. Like Myotis this species has no nose-leaf or any membranous growth about the face. It is lighter in colour than the latter, and is also considerably larger. 4. Northern Vesperugo. V esperugo borealis. Nilss. Vesperugo borealis, Nilss. Ilium. Fig. Scaudi. Faun., 1833, hiaft 19, pi. 3G. Schrenck recorded this well known European form from the Amur region, but so far as I know it has been recorded by no other traveller in, or writer upon, these parts. 8 THE NATURALIST IN MANCHURIA. 5. Ussurian Murina. Murina ussuriensis , Ognev. Murina ussuriensis , Ognev “Bemerkengen fiber die Chiropt- era und Insectivora des Ussuri- Landes,” Ann. Mus. Zool. Acad. Imp. Sci. St. Peters., Vol. XVIII, pp. 401-418, Dec. 1913. (Russian text). This is a small form of Murina described by Ognev from the Ussuri region. He gives the length of its head and body as 37 mm., and that of its tail as 29 mm. From his illustration it would appear to be simply a smaller form of our next species M . hilgendorfi, which bias also been recorded from the same region. Ognev first reported it as some subspecies of Milne-Edwards’ M. leucogaster, subsequently describing it as a distinct species. It has no sagittal crest on the skull. It has recently been recorded from Yakushima, a South Japanese island, which suggests that this species is migratory. 6. Japanese Mttrtna. Murina hilgendorfi, Peters. Murina hilgendorfi, Peters, Monatsbericht der Konigl. Akad. der Wisseusch. zu Berlin, Jan. 1880. pp. 24-25 (Jeddo). This Murina, which was originally described from Jeddo (Yedo) in Japan, has been recorded by S. J. Ognev* from the Ussuri region. It is a fairly large form,, with a proportionately rather long tail. Ognev gives the following measurement: — head and body 50 mm. ; tail 40-6 mm,. There is a low sagittal crest on the skull. It is interesting to find this species on the mainland, since it suggests migration. Indeed, from other records than this it would appear that migration takes place between the Japanese Islands and the mainland. Allen says of a Japanese specimen that the fur is thick and woolly, bright brownish above, tipped grey-white with dark bases below. 7. Dusky Murina. Murina huttoni fuscus, Sowerby. Murina huttoni fuscus , Sowerby, Journal of Mammology, Vol. 3, No. 1. February, 1922, pp. 46-7. The single specimen that I obtained of this peculiar looking bat, appears, on examination, to be different from any known form of Murina, though belonging to this genus; but up till recently it •Ann. Mus. Zool Acad. Imp. Sci. St. Peters., Vol. XVIII, pp. 401-419, pi. XII. 1913. THE BATS OF THE MANCHURIAN REGION. 9 remained un described, owing to lack of material with, which to compare it, and the generally unsatisfactory state of the group to which it belongs. That it is neither of the foregoing is shown by its measurements, the head and body iheing 58 mm., the tail 34 mm., the forearm 40 mm., and the ear 18 mm. It is thus larger than Murina hihjendorfi, Peters, with a proportionately shorter tail, and a shorter forearm (43 mm. in M. hilgendorf) ; and, of course, much larger than M. ussuriensis , Ognev. Mr. Miller on receiving my specimen at the Smithsonian Institution wrote me : “This is a Murina related to M. huttoni, a group hitherto known from India and South China. The Chinese form, M. h. rubella, is led, while the Indian race is described as ‘light snuff- brown’, whatever that may have meant in 1872. Both are imper- fectly known. . . .** He goes on to say that my specimen probably represents a third end escribed species. Under thle circumstances I decided to describe it as a subspecies of M. huttoni. It appears to be darker than true huttoni, and has the upper incisors separated from the canines only by a narrow crack, and not a wide gap, while it is certainly different from the Chinese M. h. rubella, being brown in colour. It differs from the other two Manchurian forms in measurements, as shown above. It is a peculiar looking bat, of a dusky brown colour, lighter below than above, with numerous long hairs growing on the pos- terior part of the body, on the webbing between the legs and tail, and on the legs and feet. The specimen was taken in a house near I-mien-po, N. Kiiin, late in October, 1914, which suggests that it might have been pre- paring to hibernate. 8. Japanese Long-eared Bat. Plecotus auritus sacrimontis , Allen. Plecotus sacrimontis , Allen, “Notes on Chiroptera,” Bull. Mus, Comp. Zool. Harvard Coll. Cambridge, Mjass. U.S.A., Vol. LII, No. 3, pp. 50-51, pi. fig. 6. Recorded by Ognev from the Ussuri region, this form was first described by G. Mi. Allen, from a specimen taken on Mount Fuji in Japan, as “Resembling P. auritus of Europe, but larger, with a longer and broader skull. The tibia and the thumb are noticeably longer than in P. auritus, but the ears are of about the same size." 10 THE NATURALIST IN MANCHURIA. He describes its colour as “in alcohol, dorsally a uniform brown, nearest to bistre of Ridgway, the bases of the hairs much darker; ventrally the hairs are slate color at the bases, broadly tipped with light smoke gray.” He gives its measurements as: head and body 42 mm; tail 44; ear 39> forearm 40, thumb 11.7, as against 40, 45, 36, 39 and 7 in an adult specimen of the European P. auritus. He also remarks that it is possible the mainland specimens (of Eiastern Asia) would be indistinguishable from this island form, though he had not had an opportunity of ascertaining' this. Tt is evident, then, that Sclxrenck’s record of P. auritus from the Amur refers in reality to this form, which after all can scarcely be considered as more than a subspecies of the European form. While in the Tung Ling (Eastern Tombs) area, of Chihli, which lies to the north-east of Peking, I secured a series of specimens of Plecotus in which the average length of the head and body is 52 mm. and that of the tail 51 mm., the ear being about 36 mm. and the forearm over 41 mm. This large form, which is evidently neither P. auritus or P. a. sacrimontis , probably occurs also in South-western Manchuria. 9. La Touche’s Tadarida. Tadarida latouchei , Thomas. Tadarida latouchei, Thomas, Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist. Ser. 9, Yol. Y, March 1920, pp. 283-284. This interesting species of bat, the ouly two known specimens of which were secured by Mr. La Touche at Chin-wang Tao, prob- ably occurs in Southern Manchuria if not elsewhere in the country. Chin-wang Tao is situated on the northern shore of the Pe-chi-li Gulf, not more than twelve miles from Shang-hai Kuan, which marks the boundary line between Chihli province at this point and Manchuria, and it seems highly improbable that a species of bat should occur in Chin-wrang Tao and not further east along the coast. On these grounds I include this species in our list of Manchurian mammals. Mr. La Touche very kindly allowed me to examine his specimens before he presented them to the British Museum, and I had them photographed. a\s, however, my notes agree with those given by Mr. Thomas in his description, I prefer to quote the latter. The I Fltoto by Kodak Shop, Tientsin. Two specimens of the' peculiar bat Tadanda latouchei, Tlios., collected by Mr. J. 1). de La louche at Chin-wang1 lao. THE BATS OF THE MANCHURIAN REGION. 11 nearest relation to this new species is Rafinesque’s Tadarida teniotis* , which has been recorded from Amoy on the South-east China coast, and at sea between Foimosa and the mainland. As Mr. Thomas points out Chin-wang Tao is the farthest north-east that any Tadarida has yet been recorded . Our form is closely allied to T. teniotis, but is conspicuously smaller. Its colour is described as “near ‘clovei- brown,’ the hairs whitish at base, their extreme tips pale drab, forming a prominent light ticking. Under surface scarcely paler, the hairs of chin and throat brown to their tips, those of chest and belly light-tipped like those of thie back.” The ears, though smaller than in teniotis, are larger than in most of the foregoing forms of bats, and of a characteristic shape. The skull is “very similar in shape to that of teniotis, but markedly smaller; not so flattened as in many of the African species.” Its greatest length is 21.7 mm. ; condylo-basal length 21.2 mm. ; zygomatic breadth 12.2 mm. ; and inter-orbital width 4.2 mm. The dimensions of the body are: bead and body 76 mm.; tail 43 mm. ; ear 23 mm. ; forearm 53 mm. The wings are very long and narrow, by which feature the bat may be distinguished from other species while in the air. *Cephalotis teniotis, R.ifinesque, Prec. des Decouv. Somial, p. 12. - . M $ y'i it CHAPTER II. Hedgehogs, Moles, and Shrews. CHAPTER II. Hedgehogs, Moles, and Shrews. Order INSECTIVORA. It may be taken as a general rule that insectivores occur more plentifully and in greater variety in a country favoured by a bumid climate and an abundant vegetation, for these are the conditions necessary to an abundant insect life, and it is upon insects and worms that such mammals live. Certainly this is the case in China, where the north, being dry, is particularly poor in insectivores, while in the central and western areas, where the climate is relative- ly humid, and vegetation very luxurious, shrews and moles and other related species are both plentiful and varied. The same may be said of the Japanese Islands, where Anderson, who collected there, informed me that shrews and moles were extraordinarily pleutful. It is all the more remarkable, then, that so far Manchuria has not yielded a greater number of species of these types of mam- mal than she has. Nevertheless, that countiy is richer in this respect than neighbouring North China and Mongolia. Moles are certainly extremely plentiful, and though I failed to secure more than one specimen, I feel sure that more than one species occurs. Hedgehogs, from all accounts, are plentiful, and, though I am not satisfied that so many occur, some four species have been described by different naturalists. Three species of shrew have been described from Manchuria and four from Saghalin, which latter, in this respect, agrees with the Japanese Islands. The fact remains, however, that after making all allowances, we cannot, with any degree of certainty, include morei than five insectivorous mammals in the mainland fauna of Manchuria, the Amur, and Primorskaya. These, with the four shrews from Saghalin Island, make a total of nine species for the whole Manchurian Region. 15 16 THE NATURALIST IN MANCHURIA. Family Erinaceid.® (Hedgehogs). The hedgehogs of Eastern Asia, in our present rather fragment- ary knowledg of them, form a group of mammals rather difficult to understand. A certain amount of confusion has been introduced into the subject by the somewhat haphazard naming of new species by certain Zoologists without any reference to earlier workers, which fact, taken in conjunction with the very limited and scattered material upon which we may work, makes a clear summing up of the case very difficult. However, there are a few marked and well defined forms, about which there can be no doubt, namely : (1) Erinaceus dealbatus Sw. described from Chefoo, Shantung, which occupies that province, and also the neighbouring province of Chihli; (2) E. miodon Thos., a very pale desert form from the Ordos Desert and North Shensi; (3) E. hughi Thlos. from South- contral Shensi. The descriptions of these three are entirely satisfactory, and the validity of the species admits of no discussion. Not so when we came to the case of the hedgehogs that inhabit the iMianchurian Region ; for here we have several authorities describ- ing, independently of, and even without reference to, each other’s work, what appears to be but one, or at the most two, species under different names. 10. Amur Hedgehog. Erinaceus amurensis, Schrenck. Erinaceus europceus var. amurensis, Schrenck, Reisen und Forschungen in Amur-Lande, Band. I. PI. II, 1859 This is a pale form of about the size and general appearance of the common European hedgehog ( Erinaceus europceus L.) The spines have a white or cream band towards their distal ends, to which fact the light colour of the animal is due. Pallas gives the hedgehog of Siberia, the Amur etc., as E. auritus, Gm. Both Schrenck and Radde mention this species as well as E. europceus, but they seem to agree that the Amur form is at least a distinct variety for Schrenck gives a figure with the title “Erinaceus europceus L. var. amurensis,” while Radde also uses amurensis in describing figures of a skull from somewhere in this region in Plate V of his “Reisen in Siiden von Ost-Siberien in der Jahren 1855-1859.” (published in 1862). HEDGEHOGS, MOLES, AST} SHBEYVS. 17 Dr. Satunin in Ann. Mus. Petersb. XI} pp. 170-173, 1907, names two hedgehogs, one from the* Khingan Mountains, which he calls E. chinensis, and one from “Siid-TTssurigebiet” (Southern Ussuri), which he calls E. ussuriensis. Dr. J. A. Allen, in the Bull. Amer. Mm. Nat. Hist, XIX, p. 179, 1902, describes a hedgehog under the name of E. orientalis from Vladivostok — i.e., to the South of Southern Ussuri. It is highly improbable that the Khingan hedgehog is different from the Amur one, or that there are two forms in the South TTssurian region, so that in each case the oldest valid name must stand. As Schrenck gives the figure and title, his name, amurensis, takes precedence over all later ones for the hedgehog of the Amur region ; and if there is any difference between the South TTssurian (which area includes Vladivostok) form, and that from the Amur region, then Allen’s name, orientalis, takes precedence over Satunin’s ussuriensis, since the former was described in 1902 and the latter in 1907. Dr. Allen seems, however, to consider his hedgehog from Vladivostok as representative of the form that occurs throughout South-eastern Siberia; he suppresses Radde’s use of the name amurensis on the grounds that he did not give a specific locality (though the name itself suggests a locality), while he totally ignores Schrenck’s reference to, and naming of, the Amur hedgehog. If, then, as he seems to infer, his hedgehog from Vladivostok is typical of those occurring in this general region, then his name, orientalis , must also give place to Schrenck’s much coming from all over this region, I prefer to consider the hedgehogs earlier name, amurensis ; and until much more material is forth- of the Amur, Ussuri and Manchuria Proper as one species, quite distinct from europa;us, to which the only name applicable is amurensis. This species probably merges into E. dealbatus in South-western Manchuria.* M say. The highlands of Wfest China on the Thibetan borders, Thibet itself, and North India are occupied by the ounce or snow-leopard (F. uncia.) an Alpine form; which resembles to a certain extent F. villosa, but is paler, with much larger and less distinct rosettes, divided by even wider spaces. A species of leopard has been described from Corea under the name Felis orientalis. It appears to be a somewhat darker form than fontanieri. THE WOOLLY TIGER, LEOPARDS, AND SMALLER CATS. 35 20. North China Leopard. Felis pardus fontanieri , Milne-Edwards. Felis fontanieri, Milne-Edwards, Ann. des Sc. Nat. Zool. f»e serie, 1867, t. VIII, p. 375. This leopard is found in Manchuria, as far as I have been able to ascertain, only in the extreme south-west. Here, in the moun- tains that continue in a Noith-easterly direction from Shan-hai Kuan, this formidable member of the cat family is occasionally met with, though it is not common. At one time* it must have occurred in the mountains of the Liao-tung Peninsula, (but not now. A leopard's skin that T sent to the Smithsonian Institution from Shansi, and another secured by Anderson in Shensi, and sent to the British Museum, have both been identified as F . fontanieri, which species was originally described from near Peking. That the leopards from all over North China, and the south-western corner of Manchuria belong to a single species I am satisfied, as I have been able to examine skins from all parts. The North China leopard is undoubtedly the handsomest of its kind. With its long, soft fur, pure white undecrparts, and rich yellow upper parts, together with its fine, distinct markings, and thick, almost bushy tail, ringed with black and white, it is a crea- ture of unusual beauty. In size it appears to exceed the leopards of warmer countries, but this may be due to the thickness of its coat. It is doubtful if the largest specimens will be found to exceed in length record specimens from India or Africa. In Shansi, where the leopard is plentiful in the mountainous areas, I have frequently seen very large tracks, while an animal that measures 7 feet from tip to tip before it is skinned is not considered out of the ordinary. The habits of the leopard are very similar to those of the tiger. It usually has a number of lairs, or caves, where it hides, when convenient, duiing the day, and in one of which the female has her family. Usually two cubs are born, which follow the mother for about six months. Like the tiger, the North China leopard does not confine itself to one district, but travels over a wide area, covering as much as twenty to thirty miles in a night. It nearly always follows the ridge-tops, where the wild pigs beat out regular paths. Its food consists of deer, game-birds and the 36 THE NATURALIST IN MANCHURIA. dogs and other domestic animals of mountain villages, the outskirts of which it frequently visits. It is particularly fond of dogs, and uill never lose an opportunity of gorging to the full upon this diet. The Chinese say that a leopard that has eaten its fill of dog staggers away from its kill as though intoxicated, nor will it go far before lying down and going to sleep. Whether there is any truth in this statement I have never had the opportunity of determining, but it is certain that a great many leopards are shot by the natives over a dog kill. The natives hunt the leopard with guns ; not with any form of trap. Poison, however, is frequently used. Recently the value of leopard skins has increased to a consider- able extent, and where a good pelt used to cost from $8 (Mex.) to $10 (Mex.), they now fetch from $20 to $30 (Mex.). 21. Amur Leopard. F elis pardus villosa, Bonhote. * Felis villosa, Bonhote, Ann,. & Mag. Nat. Hist., sei*. 7, Yol. XI, p. 475, May 1903. Originally described from near Vladivostok (Amur Bay, E. Siberia), this pale form is probably the same as that which appears to inhabit the Lesser Khingan Mountains and the Ussuri region. As already stated it may be distinguished from the North China leopard ( F . fontanieri) by its much lighter colouring, which more nearly resembles that of the snow-leopard (F. uncial). Indeed Schrenck records what is undoubtedly our species under Muller’s name for the snow-leopard, F. irbis, from the Amur region. F . villosa, in addition to its pale colouring, is marked with fewer rosettes, which are more widely separated from each other than in F. fontanieri. Its fur is longer and softer than in the latter, just as in the woolly tiger. It is a large animal, though so far there are very few records to go upon. 22. Lynx. Felis lynx, L. Felis lynx, L. Syst. Nat., 176G, 1, p. 63. In the forests of Manchuria occurs a lynx, which Schrenck referred to the common European form ; and in the absence of any material to go upon, or evidence to the contrary, his diagnosis must THE WOOLLY TIGER, LEOPAHDS, AND SMALLER CATS. 37 be accepted. Skins seen by me from the forest area of Northern Mongolia, which country belongs to the same faunal region, very closely resembled, if they were not identical with Thibetan skins of the isabelline lynx ( F . isabellina, Blythe),* and it is possible that the lynx that inhabits the Manchurian Region is referrable to this species. Nicholai, my Russian hunter and guide, told me that he had shot a few lynxes round I-mien-p’o, N. Kirin, but that they were very rare. Unfortunately he had no skins to show me. 23. Small-eared Cat. Felis microtis, Milne-Edwardg. F elis microtis, Milne. Edwards, Rech. Mamm. (April 1871), p. 221, pi. XXXI a. That some form, or forms, of small wild cat occurs in the Manchurian Region is certain, for where ever I went the local inhabitants told me of some such ammal.t A spotted wild cat occurs in North-eastern Chihli, and a skin collected Iby me in the Tung Ling area and sent to. the Smithsonian Institution was referred by Mr. Gerrit S. Miller in a letter to me to Elliot’s Felis euptilura ( P . Z. S. Lond. Dec. 1871, p. 760). This was considerably darker in colour than the common spotted small-eared wild cat of North China, which is referrable to Milne-Edwards’ F. microtis, origin- ally described from North-western China. A specimen collected by me in the Yen-an Fu district of North Shensi corresponded ex- actly with F . microtis, and I have seen skins of the same animal from both Shansi and North Chihli. F. euptilura, however, was described as occurring in Central China, Canton and Shanghai, which is also the range of Gray’s F . chinensis, and it is probable that the two names represent but the one form, the com- mon spotted wild cat of Central and South China.. Of .two kittens which I bought from a native at Chin-wang Tao, close to the Sino- Manchurian border, and which were obviously of the same litter, one was dark like my Tung Ling specimen, and the other was light (buff-yellow or sandy) like F. microtis; but, what was most signi- ficant, they both had the typical small ears of the latter species. *Jcnirn. As. Soc. Beng., XVI, 1847, p. 1178. tSince this was written Mr. Mori has described a species of wild cat from Mukdeai, Manchuria, under the name Felis manchurica (Ann. & Mug. Nat. Hist., vol. X, Ser. 9, No. 60, Dec. 1922, pp. 609-10.) in which the ground colour is greyish white instead cf sandy. 38 TIIE NATURALIST IN MANCHURIA. The lighter of the two grew into a fine full-sized animal, when it was indistinguishable from true microtis. It therefore seems prob- able that this form extends at least into Western and South-western Manchuria. As, however, 1 have seen a considerable number of the darker type of skin from Manchuria (exhibited for sale in the Mukden fur-shops, and exported from Tientsin) it would appear that in Central and Eastern Manchuria a darker form, or at least a darker phase, is prevalent. F . microtis may be recognized by its rich buff-yellow or sandy pelt studded writh brownish or greyish- brown arrow-shaped spots, its beautifully striated face, ringed tail, and small black and white ears. It is about the size of the common wild cat of Europe. In the darker phase the colour is considerably greyer, and the spots less conspicuous. The Chinese name is Li-tzu. 24. Manul. Felis manul , Fallas. Felis manul, Pallas, Reise III, 1776, p. 692. The well known manul, the wild cat of the Central Asian steppes, probably extends into Manchurian territory in the extreme west, where the arid steppes of Eastern Mongolia intrude upon that country. It is known to occur in neighbouring North-eastern China, though no further south than the dry semi-desert conditions of the Sino-Mongolian borderland. I have seen skins in the Tien- tsin fur market said to have come from Mukden. This is a large cat differing from the foregoing species in having longer fur, and in the absence of spots on the body. The face is striated and the thick, bushy tail barred. Its pelt is much valued on account of its fine quality. It shares with other wild cats of these regions the Chinese name of Li-tzu. CHAPTER IV. Wolves, Wild Dogs, and Foxes. CHAPTER IV. Wolves, Wild Dogs, and Foxes. Family Canidjc. The dog family is one that must always prove of interest to mankind, for the simple reason that its various members, domestic and wild, have always been so intimately connected with us throughout the history of our race. The domestic varieties have been and will continue to be our playmates from the cradle to years of maturity, and our companions and intimate friends in manhood. Stories of the wild species form part of the lore of our nurseries. The fox is an inseparable part of our country life; while the dread of the wolf has been handed down to us from ancestors to whom this ferocious animal was indeed a menace. Almost as familiar are the jackal and rhe mere divergent liyrena. The timber wolf, coyote, dingo, hunting dog of South Africa and the wild dog of India are all well known to us by reason of the writings of our authors. Thus it would seem that there is little left to say upon the Canidce of any country. Yet in the course of my wanderings in the wilderness I have gathered a few facts concerning the members of this family that inhabit Eastern Asia, that may prove of interest to my readers, and so make no apology for setting them down here. In China, Mongolia and Manchuria the dog family is well represented, not merely in species but in individuals. The wilder parts of these countries form the home of large numbers of wolves, foxes and, in places, that peculiar' little animal the raccoon-dog. Even in thickly populated areas these animals are often plentiful. In the Manchurian Region there are five distinct species be- longing to the dog family, and it is probable that of these, there are several subspecies or varieties. These are the wolf, the red fox, and its colour phases the cross fox and black or silver fox, the corsac fox, the Arctic fox, the Siberian wild dog, and the raccoon dog. 41 42 THE NATURALIST IN MANCHURIA. Of these the wolf and corsac fox, particularly the latter, belong more especially to the Mongolian faunal-region. Nowhere in the forest areas did I come across the wolf, and though the natives told me of their existence, I could never be sure that they were not re- ferring to the wild dog, especially as they used the word t’sai, which it will later be seen is applied to both the wolf and the wild dog. Nicholai, however, assured me that wolves do occur m the forest, in which case they probably belong to the true Siberian form, or else something akin to the North American timber wolf, and not to the plains woll' of the west, which appears to be Matschie’s Canis lupus tschiliensis. The common fox seems to belong to both plains and forest ; the raccoon-dog more to the wide grassy stretches that flank the great rivers. Only the wild dog is purely of the forested areas. The Arctic fox apparently occurs in the extreme north of our region, where the Siberian faunal-region abutts on the Arctic faunal-region. 25. Siberian Wolf. Canis lupus , L. Canis lupus, L. Syst. Nat., 1766, I, p. 58. It is probable that the wolf that inhabits Sibeiia extends into the forested areas of t lie Amur, Manchuria and the Primorsk; but, as already stated, the form that occurs in the western parts of Manchuria is to be referred to the subspecies Canis lupus tschiliensis Matsch., which inhabits the whole of North China at least as far south as the Yang-tzu Valley. If this surmise is coirect, then little need be said of the former of these two forms ; but the latter will bear a certain amount of discussion. The subject of the wolves of North China has been very much neglected, chiefly on account of the lack of material in European and American collections. In the provinces of Chihli and Shansi, and probably also in Shensi and Kansu as well, there appear to bei two varieties of wolves. Manchuria is to be referred to the subspecies Canis lupus tschiliensis. according to the locality. The lang, as recognized by the Chinese, is a large, gaunt animal, with a coarse coat. It is of an uniformly greyish colour, with but a slight tinge of yellow. The longer hairs are tipped with black, which colour increases on the back and forms ai line down the front of the fore-leg. The fine, bushy tail is well tipped with black. The back of the ears are slightly ochiaceous, as also is the muzzle. The chin and lower jaw almost to the angle of the latter are of a dark brown, the hairs being tipped with cream or grey. WOLVES, WILD DOGS, AND FOXES. 43 The tsai is very much smaller, with a longer, more woolly coat. It is more yellow in general colour, while on the hack there is a greater amount of black. The bushy tail is tipped with white in- stead of black, while there is very much less of the black line down the front of the fore-legs, which are ochraceous. The ears also are more ochraceous than in the lang, while the upper lips are creamy- white, which merges into a large grey patch below the eye. The chin is brown only at the tip ; the throat is inclined to a creamy- white. The whole animal shows a brighter colouring than does the lang, with greater contrasts in the different parts. I have seen many specimens of both these types, from various parts of the country, and though I cannot sav definitely that they are two distinct forms, am yet inclined to that view. In the extreme north of Shansi, and in Southern Mongolia the wolves are very much lighter in colour, with longer, softer and thicker coats than those from further south. They are also larger. A point wherein the North China wolves differ from those of Siberia is the fact that they do not form into packs, but hunt singly or in couples, sometimes in threes, and only very rarely in larger numbers. In this connection, we have it on the authority of James that the wolves of the Tsi-tsi-har district go in large packs. A large number of skins are exported from Tientsin, the most valuable being those brought down from Mongolia. The natives usually poison the wolf, though in North Shensi and on the Ordos border they use a clumsy but effective gin trap of native design and manufacture, Spring-guns are also used, and I have known hunters who would lie in wait along the paths frequented by wolves, and shoot the unsuspecting animals as they passed. 26. Bed Fox. Vulpes vulpes (L). Canis vulpes, L., Syst. Nat., 1766, p. 59. Of the common or red fox there are at least three colour phases found in the Manchurian Region. The red phase, which is the typical one is identical with the foxes commonly found in North China, which in turn so closely resemble the European form as to be inseparable, except, perhaps as a subspecies or variety. The other two colour phases correspond to what are called in North America the ‘cross-fox’ and the ‘black-’ or ‘silver-fox.’ In the former the 44 THE NATURALIST IN MANCHURIA. colour resembles the red fox except that there is a considerable amount of black about it; the hairs of the. head, neck, back and tail are heavily tipped with black, the legs being inclined to be black up to the elbow and heel, while the feet are pure black. In the ‘black’ or ‘silver’ phase the pelt is pure black sometimes sprinkled with white hairs. This form is extremely valuable. Schrenck records Canis vulpes from the Amur. China seems to be occupied by a closely related form, Vulpes huli, Sw. 27. Corsac Fox. Vulpes corsac, (L.) Canis corsac, L. Syst. Nat., 1768; III, Append., p. 223. This is the smallest and at the same time, perhaps, the pret- tiest of the canines that are found within the borders of Manchuria. It belongs to the Mongolian faunal-region, and only occurs in that part of Manchuria where the sandy steppes of the former country encroach upon the latter. It is essentially an animal of the desert, for life in which it is fitted by its pale, sandy-yellow colour. Its fur is very soft, and thick, enabling it to withstand the low tem- peratures and cruel blizzards of the regions it inhabits. Its range stretches from Western Manchuria right across Mongolia into Central Asia. 28. Arctic Fox. Alopex lagopus (L.) Canis lagopus, L. Syst. Nat., 176G, I., p. 59. The white or Arctic fox is recorded by Schrenck from the Amur, where it occurs in sufficient numbers to render it a valuable asset to the fur trappers of the northern parts of this general region. About two-thirds the size of the common fox, this handsome little animal is pure white in colour, with long, soft fur, and thick, bushy tail, its pelt being familiar to everybody in the ‘whitet-fox of the fur dealers. Its range appears to extend throughout Northern Siberia eastward into Alaska, and northward to within ten degrees of the Pole. How far south it extends rs difficult to say, but, Schrenck’s record of it in the Amur gives some indication. According to fur-traders in these parts it extends as far south as Northern Mongolia, where also a large hare that turns white in winter occurs. The skins of the latter are made up in imitation of ‘white-fox’ and are sold as such in the markets of Peking and Tientsin. WOLVES, WILD DOGS, AND FOXES. 45 29. Siberian Wild Dog. Cyon alpinus, (Pallas). Canis alpinus, Pallas, Zoographia Rosso-Asiatica, I., pp. 34 and 35, 1S31. Perhaps the most interesting canine which occurs in Manchuria is the Siberian wild dog, whose range extends across Siberia, south- ward through Zungaria into western Kansu, and eastward into the Manchurian Region, where it occurs at least as far south as the Kirin forests. The Chinese of the last mentioned district call it Y eh-kou (wild dog) or Tsai-kou (wolf dog), and are very much afraid of it. They say it hunts deer and wild pigs, always working in large packs. It will not hesitate to attack man himself. During the winter the members of a pack have to move in single file along the deer paths after each fall of snow, till such time as a hard enough crust has formed to bear their weight, and allow them to run on the surface. Before the snow has thus hardened they may be hunted down easily, though it is considered advisable for several hunters to go together. Frank Wallace in an article on the Kansu wapiti in the Badminton Magazine (Oct. 1913), mentions the fact that these deer “are much harried in the winter by a species of wild dog called ‘tsaikou’,” which he describes as “Smaller in size than a wolf, rhey will quickly clear a valley of game. I never saw one alivo, but came across some skins which are red in colour.” He is obviously referring to the Siberian wild dog, and it is interesting to note the Chinese name Tsai-kou cropping up again. Schrenck encountered this animal in the Amur regions, where, apparently, it is comparatively plentiful. Nicholai, from whom, it will have been noticed, I gathered a lot of interesting informa- tion about the animals of the forested area round I-mien-p’o in North Kirin, told me that at one time wild dogs were plentiful in that area.. On two occasions he saw a long line of them padding silently through the snow in the forest. He considered himself extremely lucky that he was mot seen by them, for he said that more than one hunter had gone out into the wrilds and had been devoured by these savage animals, who make up in numbers for what they lack in individual strength and size. He had frequently come across places where they had sat in circles in the snow, appar- 46 THE NATURALIST IX MANCHURIA. ently holding some sort of council. All who know anything of the dog family will agree that they do seem to hold such councils. I have seen three wolves sitting facing each other, exactly as though they were discussing some proposition, and then apparently having settled their course of action, have trotted off to carry it out. A wild dog occurs along the Yang-tzu Valley and in South-east and South China where, however, it does not go about in packs. It is of a red colour, which agrees with Wallace’s description of the West Kansu wild dog. This species one would take to be a con- necting link between the Siberian wild dog on the one hand and the Indian species, the red dog of the Deccan, Cyon deccanensis, on the other. If it is specifically different from both these forms then its name should be Cyon lepturus, which Heude described using the generic name Cuon , in his "Memoires concemant l’Histoire Naturelle de PEmpire Chinois.” (Vol. II, pt. 2., p. 102). The Chinese name for the wild dog, at leiast in the Nanking and Ch’in-kiang districts, is Kou-t'ou Hu, or dog-headed fox. In hunting, the wild dogs of the Manchurian Region display a good deal of sagacity, according to the accounts of natives. They pursue their quarry in relays, and give it no rest till it is worn down and finally succumbs, an easy prey. The lordly wapiti stag, whose great legs carry him through the forest in ten and twenty foot bounds cannot escape these relentless hunters, unless he can succeed in placing some wide and swift river between himself and them. The wild dogs of the genus Cyon differ from the wolves in having only two pairs of molars in the lower jaw instead of three, and also in their shorter skulls. The pelt of the Manchurian form is said to be a fine reddish colour, with long thick hair; but I was unable to verify this. 30. Raccoon-Dog. Nyctereutes procyonides (Gray) Canis procyonides, Gray, Illust. Isd. Zool. II, t., Mag. Nat. Hist. 1837, p. 578. The raccoon-dog is one of the most peculiar looking of the members of the Canidce to be met with in Eastern Asia. It is in reality a small dog, but its appearance, except for the tail which is not barred, is very much that of the raccoon. It is of a dull greyish-brown colour, sometimes with a tinge of rufous, sometimes WOLVES, WILD DOGS, AND FOXES. 47 buft’y. The long hairs are tipped with black, the underfur is thick and soft. There are two dark patches round the eyes, exactly as in the raccoon, while in size the two animals are well matched. Per- haps the dog is a little larger. The pelts are valuable, and, stripped of the long, coarse hairs, are very beautiful. In the latter state they are known to the Chinese as Hao Jung, and to European skin merchants as raccoon. The Chinese name for the animal is Hao. The raccoon dog does not occur much in the forest itself, but, as already stated, it inhabits the grassy and willow-strewn flats, that border the gTeat rivers. There it is trapped and shot in great numbers by the Chinese. It is most plentiful along the Lower Sungari and Amur Kivers, whence large numbers of skins are annually sent to Mukden, and thence exported either by way of Newehwang or Tientsin. The animal also occurs in South Man- churia, and in Corea. In China it occurs in the Tung Ling, north- east of Peking, in the valley of the Yang-tzu, and in South-eastern and Southern China. In the last named places it inhabits the brush and wooded areas. After an examination and comparison of the skins of specimens from Manchuria, Chihli and the Lower Yang-tzu, I can find little difference between them. The Amur form is slightly the larger, and somewhat darker, with thicker underfur.* •Mr. Mcri has recently described the Corean form as distinct under the rame Nyctereutes koreensis (Ann.