JRALIST'S GUIM ro THE Americas ..-'/■ :>r\ fr^ "'fiOif^.^'^"--': m mM TiJ MM m ^ m i^t? IKV ':A P %. f.H :' Rocky Mountain, Colorado; 1915, 1917; 397§ sq. mi.; Colo., page 527. Hawaii, Hawaiian Islands; 191(5, 1922; 186 sq. mi., in three separate areas.' Lassen Volcanic, California; 1916; 124 sq. mi.; Calif., page 198. Mount McKinley, Alaska; 1917, 1922; 2645 sq. mi. Grand Canyon, Arizona; 1908, 1919; 958 sq. mi.; Ariz., page 568. Lafayette, Maine; 1916. 1919; 8 sq. mi.; Me., page 310. Zion, Utah; 1909, 1918, 1919; 120 sq. mi.; includes former Mukuntuweap Na- tional Monument; Utah, page 559. NATIONAL MILITARY AND OTHER PARKS ADMINISTERED BY THE WAR DEPARTMENT Chickamauga and Chattanooga, Georgia and Tennessee; 1890; 6543 acres. "Beautiful natural park. Embraces battle fields of Chickamauga and Missionary Ridge and scenes of other conflicts of the Civil War fought in the vicinity of Chattanooga during 1863." Antietam Battle Field, Maryland; 1890; 50 acres. "Scene of one of the greatest battles of the Civil War." Shiloh, Tennessee; 1894; 3546 acres. "Natural park embracing the battle field of Shiloh near Pittsburg Land- mg." Gettysburg, Pennsylvania; 1895; 2451 acres. "Beautiful natural park. Scene of Civil War combat. Probably better marked than any other battle- field in the world." Vicksburg, Mississippi; 1899; 1323 acres. "Beautiful natural pai'k. Scene of the siege and surrender of Vicksburg in 1863 during the Civil War." Lincoln's Birthplace, Kentucky; 1916; "Contains the l6g cabin and part of the farm where Lincoln was born." Guilford Courthouse, North Carolina; 1917; 125 acres. "Near Greensboro. Scene of one of the great battles of the Revolution; fought in 1781." NATIONAL MONUMENTS ADMINISTERED BY THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Devils Tower, Wyoming; 1906; 1152 acres. "Remarkable natural rock tower, of volcanic origin, 1200 ft. in height." IMontezuma Castle, Arizona; 1906; 160 acres. "Prehistoric cliff-dwcllii.g y'lfi • • • of scenic and ethnologic interest." El Morro, New Mexico; 1906, 1917; 240 acres. "Enormous sandstone rock eroded in form of a castle, upon which inscriptions have been placed by early Spanish explorers. Contains chlf-dweller ruins. Of great historic scenic, and ethnologic interest." Petrified Forest, Arizona; 1906, 1911; 25,625 acres. "Abundance of petrified coniferous trees, one of which forms a small natural bridge." Chaco Canyon, New Mexico; 1907; 20,629 acres. "Numerous cliff-dweller ruins." Muir Woods, California; 1908, 1921; 426.43 acres. (See Calif.) Pinnacles, California; 1908, 1923; 2653.46 acres. (See Calif.) Natural Bridges, Utah; 1908, 1909, 1916; 2740 acres. (See Utah.) Lewis and Clark Cavern. Montana; 1908, 1911; 160 acres. Temporarily closed to the public. "Immense lime- stone cavern of great scientific in- terest, magnificently decorated with stalactite formations." Tumacacori, Arizona; 1908; 10 acres. Ruin of Franciscan mission. Navajo, Arizona; 1909, 1912; 360 acres. "Numerous pueblo or clitT-dwcller ruins, in good preservation." Shoshone Cavern, Wyoming; 1909; 210 acres. "Cavern of considerable ex- tent, near Cody." Gran Quivira, New Mexico; 1909. 1919. 560 acres. Early Spanish mission ruins and pueblo ruins. Sitka, Alaska; 1910; 57 acres. "Park of great natural beauty and historic interest as scene of massacre of Russians by Indians. Contains 16 totem poles of best native workman- ship." Rainljow Bridge, Utah; 1910; 160 acres. "Unique natural bridge of great scientific interest and symmetry. Height 309 feet above water, and span is 278 feet, in shape of rainbow." Colorado, Colorado; 1911; 13,SS3 acres; "Many lofty monoliths, and is won- derful example of erosion, and of great scenic beauty and interest." 24 NATURALIST'S GUIDE TO THE AMERICAS Papago Saguaro, Arizona; 1914, 1922; 1940.43 acres. "Splendid collection of characteristic desert flora and numerous pictographs. Interesting rock formations." Dinosaur, Utah; 1915; 80 acres. (See Utah.) Capulin Mountain, New Mexico; 1916; 681 acres. "Cinder cone of geologi- cally recent formation. Verendrye, North Dakota; 1917; 253.04 acres. Includes Crowhigh Butte SeeN. D. Casa Grande, Arizona; 1889, 1909, 1918; 480 acres. "These ruins are one of the most noteworthy relics of a pre- historic age and people within the limits of the United States. Dis- covered in ruinous condition in 1694." Katmai, Alaska; 1918; 1,088,000 acres. "Valley of Ten Thousand Smokes." Scotts Bluff, Nebraska; 1919; 2053.83 acres. "Region of historic and sci- entific interest. Many famous old trails traversed by the early pioneers in the winning of the West passed over and through this monument." Yucca House, Colorado; 1919; 9.6 acres. "Relic of prehistoric inhabitants." Fossil Cycad, South Dakota; 1922; 320 acres. "Area containing deposits of plant fossils." Aztec Ruin, New Mexico; 1923; 4.6 acres. "Prehistoric ruin of pueblo type containing 500 rooms." Hovenweep, Utah-Colorado; 1923; 285.8 acres. "Four groups of prehistoric towers, pueblos and cliff dwellings." Pipe Spring, Arizona; 1923; 40 acres. "Old stone fort and spring of pure water in desert region." Carlsbad Cave, New Mexico; 1923; 719.22 acres. Immense cavern; see Nat. Geog. Mag., January, 1924. NATIONAL MONUMENTS ADMINISTEEED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Gila Cliff Dwellings, New Mexico; 1907; 160 acres. "Numerous cliff-dweller ruins of much interest and in good preservation." In Gila National Forest. Tonto, Arizona; 1907; 640 acres; similar to Gila Cliff Dwellings. In Tonto National Forest. Jewel Cave, South Dakota; 1908; 1280 acres. "Limestone cavern of much beauty and considerable extent, limits of which are as yet unknown." In Harney National Forest. Wheeler, Colorado; 1908; 300 acres. "Of much interest from geological stand- point as example of eccentric erosion and extinct volcanic action. Of much scenic beauty." In Cochetopa and Rio Grande National Forests. Mount Olympus, Washington; 1909, 1912, 1915; 299,370 acres. Contains many objects of great and unusual scientific interest, including many glaciers. Is summer range and breed- ing ground of the Olympic elk." In Olympic National Forest. Oregon Caves, Oregon; 1909; 480 acres. "Extensive caves in limestone of much beauty; magnitude not entirely ascertained." In Siskiyou National Forest. Devil Postpile, California; 1911; 800 acres. "Spectacular mass of hexag- onal basaltic columns, like an immense pile of posts. Said to rank with famous Giant's Causeway in Ireland." In Sierra National Forest. Walnut Canyon, Arizona; 1915; 960 acres. "Contains cliff -dwellings of much scientific and popular interest." In Coconino National Forest. Bandelier, New Mexico; 1916; 22,075 acres. "Vast number of cliff-dweller ruins, with artificial caves, stone sculpture, and other relics of pre- historic life." In Santa Fe National Forest. Old Kasaan, Alaska; 1916; 38.3 acres. "Abandoned Indian village in which there are numerous remarkable totem poles and other objects of historical interest." In Tongass National Forest, Lehman Caves, Nevada; 1922; 593.03 acres. "Limestone caverns of much beauty and of scientific interest and importance." In Nevada National Forest. Timpanogos Cave, Utah; 1922; 250 acres. Limestone cavern. In Wa- satch National Forest. Bryce Canyon, Utah; 1923; 7440 acres. "Box canyon filled with countless array of fantastically eroded pin- nacles. Best exhibit of vivid coloring of earth's materials." In Powell National Forest. Extensions of a number of parks are advocated by the Director of the Na- tional Park Service: Crater Lake to include Diamond Lake; Yellowstone to include the Teton Country to the south; Rainier to include Ohanapecosh Hot Springs, to the southeast; and the much discussed extensions of Yosemite and Sequoia, which involve elimination of land now park territory, and inclu- USES OF NATURAL AREAS 25 sion of scenic areas now outside park limits. The enlargement of Sequoia National Park by the creation of Roosevelt- Sequoia National Park, involves not alone addition of desirable territory, but exclusion from the park boundary of parts of park territory. The addition includes some of the finest Sierra coun- try— Mt. Whitney, the Kings and Kern Canyons and Tehipite Valley. The bill, as it now stands, retains all but a small part of the 3 southern townships whose exclusion met with so much opposition among naturalists. Most of the Sequoia groves are retained. The inclusion of the headwaters and canyons of the Kings River, one of the finest valleys of the Sierras, is meeting with strong opposition from local irrigation districts. The proposed change in Yosemite National Park also involves the acquir- ing of a section of the High Sierras, and the exclusion of certain private lands (10,959.89 acres) along the western boundary. These private holdings cause administrative difficulties, because of grazing problems and the cutting of the timber. In both cases, the territory (not now privately owned) excluded from the parks comes under the control of the Forest Service. Proposals for new parks and monu- ments are constantly being made. All must be investigated for availability and desirability. The area must be one of national, not merely local interest. Areas of great local interest should be taken care of as State parks. Only one national park, Lafayette, is situated east of the Mississippi River. It seems desirable that the park system be in- creased in this section of the country if suitable areas can be secured. Among proposals here, are Sand Dunes, ^ Mis- sissippi Valley, Appalachia, Everglades, Mount Katahdin, and Mammoth Cave. In the West, where scenic features of merit are more numerous, many propo- 2 "Report on the Proposed Sand Dunes National Park, Indiana." Stephen T. Mather, Director of the National Park Service. 1917. 113 pp. sals have been made prominent among which is the Glacier Bay region of Alaska. Many worthy areas have also been proposed as national monuments. Proposals presented to the Sixty- eighth Congress, include the following: Mount Katahdin (Maine). Killdeer Mountain (North Dakota). Roosevelt (North Dakota). Mammoth Cave (Kentucky). Mississippi Valley (Wisconsin, Iowa). Utah (Utah). Appalachia (Virginia) — to include sum- mit of High Knob Mountain. Wonderland (South Dakota). Lincoln (Virginia, Kentucky, Tennessee) — to include High Pinnacle Moun- tain and Cumberland Gap. Nicolet (Wisconsin) — an abandoned military reservation; 1046 acres. Battle of Bear's Paw (Montana) — as a national monument. Grand Coulee (Washington). Yakima (Washington) — to include Mt. Adams and surrounding territory. Blue Knob (Pennsylvania). An area in a National Forest reservation in Georgia. Many other bills to establish national parks and monuments have been pre- sented. All such areas have been or are being investigated. There has recently been appointed by Secretary Work, a Southern Appalachian Park Committee. This committee is "to undertake a thorough study of the Southern Appalachian Mountains for the purpose of selecting the most worthy site in that range as a national park, in order to conserve the scenery and the plant and animal life under established national park policies for the use and education of our people." They have since recommended two areas, the Shenandoah in Virginia and the Great Smokies in Tennessee and North Caro- lina. The national park system will doubt- less continue to expand, and to increase in value as its parks and monuments become increasingly popular as rec- reational areas, and as natural areas in which the study of native fauna and flora may be carried on to advantage. 26 NATURALIST'S GUIDE TO THE AMERICAS LITERATURE Almost every periodical dealing with travel or nature contains articles on one or more of our national parks. The following are of a more general nature : A Guide to the National Parks of America. Edited by Edward Frank Allen. Robert McBride and Co., New York, revised edition, 1918. 338 pp., map and illustrations. The National Parks Portfolio. Robert Sterling Yard. 248 pp., 306 ill. Gov. Pr. Office. Your National Parks. Enos A Mills. Glimpses of our National Parks. R. S. Yard. 72 pp., 31 ill. Gov. Pr. Office. General Information regarding the National Monuments. (Contains descriptions of all national monu- ments administered by the Depart- ment of the Interior, the Depart- ment of Agriculture, and the War Department.) Gov. Pr. Office. (Out of print.) Information Circulars for individual parks. Free on request to Director, National Park Service. (Available for Crater Lake, Grand Canyon, Hawaii, Hot Springs, Mesa Verde, Mount Rainier, Rocky Mountain, Sequoia and General Grant, Wind Cave, Yellowstone, and Yosemite. Automobile Road and Trail Maps. Director, National Park Service. Annual Reports of the Department of the Interior and of the National "Pt tIv i^prvicp The Relation of Wild Life to the Public in National and State Parks. Charles C. Adams, Proc. 2nd Nat. Conf., State Parks, 1922. Glacier National Park Flora of Glacier National Park. Paul C. Standley. Contr. U. S. Natl. Herb., vol. 22, pt. 5. 1921. Wild Animals of Glacier National Park. The Mammals. Vernon Bailey ; The Birds. Florence Merriam Bailey. 210 pp., 94 fig., 37 pi., 1 map. 1918. Origin of the Scenic Features of Glacier National Park. M. R. Campbell. 42pp., 25111. 1914. Gov. Pr. Office. Glaciers of Glacier National Park. W. C. Alden. 48 pp., 30 ill. 1914. Gov. Pr. Office. Some Lakes of Glacier National Park. M. J. Elrod. 32 pp., 19 ill. 1912. Gov. Pr. Office. Glacier National Park. A Popular Guide to Its Geology and Scenery. M. R. Campbell. U. S. Geol. Surv., Bull. 600. 54 pp., 13 pi., map. 1914. Gov. Pr. Office. Glacier National Park, Its Trails and Treasures. Mathilde Edith Holz and Katherine Isabel Bemis. Tenting Tonight. Mary Roberts Rine- hart. Houghton Mifflin Co. 1918. Yellowstone National Park Geological History of Yellowstone National Park. Arnold Hague. 24 pp., 10 ill. 1912. Gov. Pr. Office. Geysers. Walter Harvey Weed. 32 pp., 23 ill. 1912. Gov. Pr. Office. Fossil Forests of Yellowstone National Park. F. H. Knowlton. 32 pp., 15 ill. 1914. Gov. Pr. Office. Fishes of the Yellowstone National Park. W. C. Kendall. 28 pp., 17 ill. 1915. The Big'.Game''Animals"'of Yellowstone National Park. Edmund Heller. Roosevelt Wild Life Bulletin, vol. 2, no. 4: 405-467. 1925. The Food of Trout in Yellowstone Na- tional Park. Richard A. Muttkow- ski. Roosevelt Wild Life Bulletin, vol. 2, no. 4: 471-497. 1925. The Birds of the Yellowstone National Park. Milton P. Skinner. Roosevelt Wild Life Bulletin, vol. 3, no. 1. 192 pp. 1925. Grand Canyon National Park The Shinumo Quadrangle, Grand Canyon district, Arizona. L. F. Noble, U. S. Geol. Surv., Bull. 549. 1914. Rocky Mountain National Park Geologic Story of Rocky Mountain National Park. Willis T. Lee. Mountaineering in Rocky Mountain National Park. Roger W. Toll. Lafayette National Park The Sieur de Monts National Monu- ment as a Bird Sanctuary. The Coastal Setting, Rocks and Woods ! of the Sieur de Monts National ^' Monument. An Acadian Plant Sanctuary. The Sieur de Monts National Monument as commemorating Acadia and early French influences of Race and Set- tlement in the United States. Natural Bird Gardens on Mount Desert Island. (All the above from Director of N. P. Service.) USES OF NATURAL AREAS 27 Yosemite National Park A Yosemite Fora. Hall. Sketch of Yosemite National Park and an Account of the Origin of Yose- mite and Hetch Hetchy Valleys F. E. Matthes. Gov. Pr. Office. Forests of Yosemite, Sequoia, and General Grant National Parks. C L. Hill. Gov. Pr. Office. The Secret of the Big Trees— Yosemite, Sequoia, and General Grant National Parks. Ellsworth Huntington. Mount Rainier National Park Features of the Flora of Mount Rainier 5; i National Park. J. B. Flett. Gov Pr. Office. Forests of Mount Rainier National Park. G.F.Allen. Gov. Pr. Office. Mount Rainier and Its Glaciers. F. E Matthes. Gov. Pr. Office. Mount Rainier, a Record of Explora- tions. Edmond S. Meany. i^ Crater Lake National Park Geological History of Crater Lake. J. S. Diller. Gov. Pr. Office. Forests of Crater Lake National Park. J. F. Pernot. Gov. Pr. Office. 5. MUSEUMS AND NATURE By Frank Collins Baker Many well informed people have thought that the elaborate habitat groups in the modern museum can take the place of first hand contact with the animals in their natural environment. These groups are indeed wonderfully life-like, and in many cases faithfully portray the life as it may be seen in nature, and when scientifically accurate and constructed with due regard to the psychology of the museum visitor they have both a value to ecology and an interest for the visitor. But these groups, good as they are, only interpret certain phases of the life of the animals, giving the average person a birds-eye view of some of the phenomena which go to make up the every-day occupation of wild life. Such groups as the Vir- ginia deer in the four seasons, on exhibi- tion in the Field Museum of Natural History, give the student a good idea of the changes that take place in the form and fur of these common animals: but this simply interprets these phe- nomena and cannot take the place of the wild deer in their native haunts. These museum groups, however, have a real ecological value, not only in- terpreting nature to those who may be fortunate enough to be able to visit the national parks and other wild places of nature, and so make these visits of more profit and pleasure, but they aLso give to those individuals (who unfor- tunately are in the majority) who cannot leave the big centers of population and enjoy wild life at first hand, a glimpse of wild animal life as it is, or more often, as it has been, before man took complete possession of the land, lake, and forest for his personal, and too often, selfish use. The preservation of natural areas for the maintenance of wild life is emphati- cally desired by, and necessary for, the modern museum, for only by a study of these natural areas can these wonderful groups be made. It is be- coming increasingly difficult to find places near the cities where even the smaller life can be studied for such purposes. Lakes and streams adjacent to towns and small cities (to say nothing of these near the large metropolitan cities, where almost everything is de- spoiled) are either heavily polluted and the fauna and flora killed or so changed by modern life of the suburbanite as to completely destroy all vestiges of origi- nal wild life. The preservation of small natural, more or less virgin, areas near small towns and cities is imperative and must be accomplished soon, or all such places will be lost forever. The large museums of the big cities as well as the smaller nuiseums of towns, small cities, and those connected with universities, are in a position to aid the movement for the preservation of wild life sanctuaries by the intelligent display of their material so that visitors may become interested in wild life, and thus be led to add their influence when constructive legislation is urged by the many societies fostering this subject. 28 NATURALIST'S GUIDE TO THE AMERICAS The museum habitat group has now become one of the chief features of in- terest in all museums, and many very good examples of this new art are scat- tered over the country from the Atlantic to the Pacific, notably at New York, Pittsburg, Chicago, Milwaukee, Denver, San Francisco, and other places, and the tourist may happily visit these places and later visit the native haunts of the animals exhibited. The auto- mobile has brought the city and the wild places closer together, and one may often pass in a few hours from the museum halls to the wilds of a national or state park. The modern museum seeks to interpret the lives of wild animals for the benefit of all people, rather than to simply store up vast hordes of material for the speciahst, though the latter work must be carried on also for the advancement of our knowledge of life in general. The museum is now, and always has been, the champion of the conservation of wild life. 6. THE GAME REFUGES AND PUBLIC SHOOTING GROUNDS OF PENNSYLVANIA By John M. Phillips Member- of the Board of Game Commis- sioners of Pennsylvania, 1905 to 1924 Some 30 years ago, the thinking sports- men of the State of Pennsylvania be- coming alarmed at the rapid disap- pearance of wild game generally in this State, awoke suddenly to a realization of the fact that if it was to be saved for posterity immediate action was neces- sary to secure its protection and pres- ervation. It was recognized that in order to attain results, a head to direct and guide the efforts of the sportsmen was necessary. After considerable agi- tation, in 1895, by an Act of Legislature, the Game Commission was created, empowered to collect data and to recom- mend legislation relating to the subject of game and wild bird preservation, and to enforce such laws as might be enacted. The Commission was to consist of six sportsmen, appointed by the Governor, without regard to their political affilia- tions, as it was intended to keep the Game Commission a non-partisan body and out of politics; the Commissioners were to serve for love of the work and without remuneration. The cause was particularly fortunate in the first Commission, as the men appointed were enthusiasts on the subject of wild game conservation; besides, they had had considerable ex- perience in protecting birds and animals upon lands under their control. Soon after taking office, the Commissioners realized that in order to accomplish results something more than good game laws and their enforcement was neces- sary, for while this might take care of the game left in the State, no provision was made for increasing the supply. Having in mind the magnificent results achieved by the Federal Government through the establishment of National Parks and Game Refuges in various parts of the United States, and the experiences of those in our State who owned private game preserves, the Com- missioners, some years later, hit upon the idea of establishing in various parts of the State, refuges or sanctuaries into which game of all kinds and song and insectivorous birds could retreat and find safety when harassed by ene- mies. It was thought that freedom from disturbance, especially during the breed- ing season, in an area where predatory animals and birds could be extermi- nated, and where a closed season would be maintained perpetually, would result in a marked increase in the birds and animals in those sanctuaries. A careful investigation of the subject of game propagation satisfied the Com- missioners that efforts to raise in cap- tivity our native game birds, such as wild turkey, ruffed grouse and quail had not as yet met with material success. An- other point that was seriously con- sidered was that just as the introduction of the English Sparrow and the German usp:s of natural areas 29 Oarp had resulted disastrously to the Nation, so might the importation of foreign game birds and animals result in more injury than good to the State. After considering all phases of the question, the idea of a game farm was abandoned, and the Commissioners turned with renewed conviction to the refuge or sanctuary idea, by which our native game birds and game could multiply without assistance from man, other than the systematic extermination of predatory forms and the absolute protection afforded by a perpetual closed season. Happily for the purpose of the Com- mission, the movement for the conserva- tion of our forests and water-supply was well under way. Our State Department of Forestry had already acquired large tracts of land, located almost without exception in our mountain counties, at the head-waters of streams, consti- tuting a forest reserve area and rec- reation ground for our people, which, at the present time, aggregates over a million acres distributed over almost half of the 67 Counties of the State. The area of these forest reserves vary, ranging from 1176 acres in Wyoming County to 128,085 acres in Clinton County. By an Act of Legislature of May 11, 1905, the Game Commission was au- thorized, with the consent of the Com- missioner of Forestry, to establish Game Refuges or sanctuaries upon the State forest lands. The Legislature of 1907 limited the area of these Preserves to 9 mi. in circumference, while those of 1911 and 1915 increased their size and provided that the greatest transverse dimension should not exceed 10 mi. nor should the area of the preserve exceed 2 of the total area of the tract of land of the forestry reservation upon which the preserve was located. In 1919, an Act was passed, backed by the sports- men, authorizing the Game Commission to purchase with the surplus from the Resident Hunters License Fund, lands near our large centers of population, where the Forestry Commission did not already possess lands, for the purpose of establishing game sanctuaries and hunt- ing grounds, similar to those on State lands. Also, an Act allowing the Game Commission to provide auxiliary game preserves of not less than 250 acres or more than 4000 acres through the con- sent of the owners or by lease. These auxiliary preserves may consist of farm lands. These wild cut over and burnt over lands, although, in the main, unsuit- able for agriculture, are the natural homes of the game it was desired to attract and propagate and possess the necessary summer and winter feed, streams and cover for our birds, bear, deer, squirrels, rabbits, etc. Chestnuts, beech-nuts, acorns and many other nuts, wild-grapes, haws and other fruits, are abundant, together with an almost endless variety of berries. So long as the ground remained bare feed would be plentiful, and with the coming of the snows and ice many of the birds could feed upon the buds of the beech, birch and other trees, and, if necessary, could be fed by the Preserve keepers. Besides, some of the tracts possessed waters upon which wild water-fowl might find a resting place, at least in their migratory flight. Rather than establish a few Refuges of large dimensions, it was deemed advisable to create numerous small ones of about 3000 acres each in extent, and to locate them, as nearly as possible, in the center of the forest reserves in different counties. The purpose of so locating the sanctuaries was to make sure that the game propagated therein would first spread to the State land or land purchased with the sportsmen's funds rather than to the property of any individual or organization which might be posted to prohibit hunting. In this way, the game refuges would produce an unending supply of game which would naturally and inevitably spread to the public forest lands from which no hunter is barred. It is thought wise to locate the ref- uges in sections where the game had formerly been plentiful but had been 30 NATURALIST'S GUIDE TO THE AMERICAS practically exterminated, to gain by such action the support and assistance of the hunters in that region, rather than to locate in territory containing plenty of game, thereby incurring the resentment of the hunters who would feel that their best hunting grounds has been taken away. When the location of the Refuge has been decided upon, the first thing nec- essary is to exterminate the predatory species, which destroy more game than the hunters. The wildcat, weasel, fox, skunk, mink, crow, hawk, owl, and the prowling house-cat are, through the care- ful use of strychnine, and by other means, killed off. The next step is to guard against the danger from fire, and the brush is cleared from a strip of land 15 to 20 ft. wide around the outside of the Preserve. In some instances, where the danger from fire is pronounced, it is also crossed with fire lines, thus creating open roads where fires may be met and extinguished. Predatory animals having been ex- terminated and provision made for fighting forest fires, we next surround the refuge with a single marking wire, fastened to trees or posts, about waist high on a man, the object being not to enclose the game but to define the limits of the refuge. This wire is usually nine miles long and is placed inside the fii'e lines surrounding the Refuge. At frequent intervals, notices printed upon muslin are tacked up along the line of wire, fastened to trees or posts, calling attention to the fact that the lands inside the wire are a State refuge for game, and asking for the cooperation of all in seeing that the game is not disturbed. The sanctity of these Pre- serves, in almost 15 years, has only been violated once, and then, it was claimed, by mistake, showing that our sportsmen appreciate their value. The Refuge is now ready for the game, and if it is not already, sufficiently stocked, game of various kinds, such as deer, elk, wild turkeys, fox squirrels, etc., are purchased and placed in it. A State Game Keeper is in charge of each Refuge. His duties are to fight fires, see that the Game is not molested, keep the Refuge free from predatory ani- mals, on which, as an incentive, he is paid the regular bounties. In order to supplement the natural feed in the Refuges and attract and maintain wild life, he is instructed to plant walnuts, hickory nuts, mulberries, wild cherries, mountain ash, apples, wild grapes and other nut, fruit and berry producing trees and shrubbery, buckwheat and other grains. In addition to this, he plants barberries, spruces, pines, etc. for shelter and winter cover. There are no fences around the Pre- serves and, as stated above, the wire is intended only as a marker, so that the game is not confined in any way, but can enter and leave the Refuge at will, it being intended to reproduce as nearly as possible the conditions under which animals and birds thrive in a wild state. Naturally, the herds and flocks inter- mingle at pleasure and there is no in- breeding with the consequent loss in stamina that would occur in a fenced enclosure. Provided dogs and guns are left out- side the wire, our Refuges are open to the public except during the open season for game when no person, save the officer in charge, is allowed within the wire, the purpose of this provision being to prevent the driving of deer and other game outside the Preserve onto the Forest Reserve, where it may be killed in the open season. We now have 33 Game Refuges of about 3000 acres each with a large area surrounding them upon which men may hunt. Ten of these Refuges were pur- chased by the sportsmen's funds. Owing to the almost universal posting of farms against hunting and the hunter being a tenant-at-will on State lands, the for- ward-looking sportsmen of Pennsylvania are now asking for an increase in the Resident Hunters License Fee. This increase to be used exclusively for purchase of Game Refuges and Pub- lic Shooting Grounds, preferably in 10,000 acre tracts, scattered throughout USES OF NATURAL AREAS 31 the State, and to be under the absolute control of the Game Commission, for the purpose of propagating wild life and bringing back our forests and waters. The results attained have been so evident and so uniformly successful in all our Refuges as to demonstrate beyond any question the value of this idea. Our Preserves are no longer an experiment. The steady increase in the supply of game in them, on the large public hunting-grounds surrounding them, and in their neighborhood, has been remarkable. The large northern deer imported from other States and placed in these Refuges have thrived and multiplied so that localities in which they were formerly plentiful but had been exterminated are again populated with these beautiful and useful creatures of the woods. Many stories are told regarding the instinct or sagacity of the deer, espe- cially old bucks, in eluding their pur- suers by seeking safety in these refugees. The grouse and turkeys are quick to take advantage of these sanctuaries, especially the former. To our minds, this system of game propagation in its habitat and environ- ment under absolutely natural condi- tions with protection from hunters and predatory animals, is infinitely superior to any plan which involves the breeding of game in confinement. In fact, the Pennsylvania Game Commission con- siders it a patriotic duty to bend all its energies and apply all its resources to the conservation and perpetuation of our native and useful wild life rather than to import from foreign countries at great expense birds and animals of doubtful values. Through the adoption of Pennsyl- vania's constructive Game Refuge policy, the million acres of State Forest Reserve, on which a few years ago wild life was almost extinct, are being gradu- ally ^made into the greatest hunting and recreation grounds ever contem- plated for the benefit of the people of any State. 7. THE RELATION OF OUR SHRUBS AND TREES TO OUR WILD BIRDS' By F. Smith Anyone who pays even slight attention to the citizens of our bird world knows that they show preferences for certain kinds of surroundings. For some kinds of birds one must go to the open fields; for others, to the woodlands; while many shore and water birds must be sought along the water courses and in the swamps. A somewhat further acquain- tance leads to the knowledge that birds of a given species may frequent very different kinds of situations for feeding, for nesting, and for refuge. Some spe- cies, as the robins and grackles which feed in the open fields, seek refuge and nesting sites in the woodlands and in shade trees. Still others, which may feed and nest on the ground in open fields, do not get very far from some protecting shrubbery or hedge to which they fly when disturbed. Although certain kinds of birds are ready to adapt themselves to quite extensive changes in their surroundings, others will simply disappear when such changes occur. The cutting away of the forests of several northern states is known to have been followed by a decrease of some of the forest-loving species and an increase of those that prefer the open fields or tiie shrubby areas incident to new clearings. Re- ports on the birds of several different states are confirmatory of this statement. \Vhen one learns the habits of all the birds which are to be found during the year in any one of our ordinary Illinois localities and then makes a list of those which are not dependent in any way on trees or shrubs for food, nesting sites, > From "Arbor and Bird Days," Illinois Cir. No. 83, SprinKfickl. 1915. W. L. McAtce states that there exists in most iwrta of the United States either a superstition, ii con- viction, or a legal requirement that roadsides bo shorn of their vecetation at least once a year. So far as the elTeot upon birds is concerned, there can be no doubt that supprcs.