THE UNIVERSITY

OF ILLINOIS

LIBRARY

Return this book on or before the Latest Date stamped below. A charge is made on all overdue books.

U. of I. Library

FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY

*

PUBLICATION 247 ZOOLOGICAL SERIES VOL. XII, No. 14

A NEW CROCODILE FROM NEW GUINEA

BY

KARL P. SCHMIDT

Assistant Curator of Reptiles and Amphibians

WILFRED H. OSGOOD

Curator, Department of Zoology

EDITOR

\ NATURAL HISTORY

Al'K 3 1928 CHICAGO, U. S. A.

February 23, 1928 UNIVtKSllY Of ,ui.lNOI!S

PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BT FIELD MUSEUM PRESS

A NEW CROCODILE FROM NEW GUINEA-

BY KARL P. SCHMIDT

In arranging the crocodilian material in the collections of Field Museum of Natural History, I find two skulls which represent a strikingly distinct new species of crocodile. These skulls were received by the Department of Zoology as a transfer from the De- partment of Anthropology, where they had long been stored with the Museum's very extensive New Guinean collections. The skulls in question were secured by Dr. George A. Dorsey in the course of his expedition of 1908. I am indebted to Dr. A. B. Lewis for kindly aid in searching for the second of the two skulls now before me.

Crocodilus novae-guineae sp. nov.

Type from Ibundo, lower Sepik River, northern New Guinea. No. 13092, Field Museum of Natural History. A juvenile skull with- out mandibles. Collected in 1908 by George A. Dorsey.

Range. Known only from the Sepik River, Northern New Guinea.

Diagnosis. A crocodile with a moderately acute snout, inter- mediate between C. porosus and C. johnstoni. Allied to porosus by the presence of anteorbital ridges, to johnstoni by the sharper snout and the form of the palatines. Length of snout slightly more than twice its breadth. No bulbous swelling at the base of the palatines.

Description of type. General form of skull acutely triangular, much depressed, and without median ridge or swelling, lightly and slenderly built throughout. Supratemporal fenestrae large. Orbits about twice the diameter of the narial aperture. Palatine fenestrae with a well-marked angulation in their posterior border. Internal narial aperture rounded, longer than wide. Premaxillaries little ex- panded, pierced by the anterior mandibular teeth, separated by the entry of the nasals into the external narial aperture. Maxillary-pre- maxillary suture produced backward to the second maxillary tooth. Premaxillary foramen arrow-head shaped. An obtuse ridge from the anteorbital border on each lacrymal. Cranial table flat. Palatines with an acute anterior angle, (as in other sharp-snouted crocodiles), nearly parallel sided, narrow. Pterygoids distinctly stalked, i. e.

177 THE L1BKABY \tt THE APR 3 1928

UNIVERSITY 01- ILLINOIS

1 78 FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY ZOOLOGY, VOL. XII.

palato-pterygoid suture anterior to the posterior border of the palatal fenestrae. Upper teeth 18-19.

Notes on paratype. A larger skull, Field Museum No. 2854, is labeled "Probably from Lower Sepik River," and was received with the same collection of anthropological material as the type. The smaller specimen is made the type in order to fix the type locality more definitely.

The paratype is an excellently preserved skull, with the man- dibles, slightly charred in two places and with one pterygoid angle broken away. Although nearly twice as large as the smaller skull, there is remarkably little difference in proportions. It agrees very satisfactorily with the type in all essential characters.

Comparing the proportionate length of snout with that of porosus given by Mook (1921, p. 191), we have the following figures, (a) being the ratio of the breadth of the snout at its base to the length, (b) that of the breadth at the fifth maxillary tooth to the same length :

C, novae-guineae C. porosus

Museum Number F.M.N.H. 13092 2854 A.M.N.H* 7115 15179

Length of skull 150 mm. 271 mm. 305 mm. 642 mm.

Ratio (a) .46 .48 .55 .56

Ratio (b) .34 .34 .42 .47

Remarks. It is highly remarkable to find a well characterized new species of crocodile, even from New Guinea. It seems certain that other material of the present species must exist in museums, and the anthropological collections of the Berlin Museum, especially, should be searched for additional specimens.

It seems probable that this species is a fresh- water crocodile, with the same mutual exclusiveness of range with that of the salt-water crocodile, C. porosus, as exists between the north Australian fresh- water species and the wide-ranging porosus. The Sepik River, (Kai- serin Augusta on German maps), is the largest river of northern New Guinea, and in view of the existence of C. johnstoni in Australia, it is less surprising to find a fresh-water species in New Guinea. In many respects the new form is intermediate between porosus and johnstoni, being allied to johnstoni in the depressed snout and narrow pointed palatines. However, it seems certain, from comparison with other species, that these characters are parallel modifications accompany- ing elongation of the snout, and that novae-guineae is not especially available as a form ancestral to johnstoni, though it illustrates well enough how johnstoni may have been developed.

NEW CROCODILE FROM NEW GUINEA SCHMIDT 179

In view of the detailed account of the skull characters of recent crocodilia on a uniform plan drawn up by Dr. Charles C. Mook, (Mook, 1921, 1923; Longman, 1925; supplemented by Schmidt, 1924), I have prepared an account of the single paratype (the more complete skull) with the same headings, comparing the respective bones with those of Crocodilus porosus, employing Mook's description and a large skull, Field Museum No. 13219, for comparison.

General form. The skull of Crocodilus novae-guineae has the gen- eral proportions of the skull of Crocodilus acutus, from which it differs in being flat and depressed from the orbits forward. The skull is more acute than in porosus, with much lower pre-orbital ridges, and is much less massive in almost every bone. The lateral constrictions and the vertical festooning are slight.

Cavities of skull. The supratemporal fenestrae are large and rounded. The infratemporal fenestrae are proportioned as in acutus. The orbits are relatively large, their length twice the width of the interorbital space. The external narial aperture is an elongated oval, with a re-entrant angle in front and at the rear, its length nearly one and a half times its breadth. The premaxillary foramen has the shape of a blunt arrow-head. The palatine fenestrae differ from those of porosus in the rather sharp angulation of their ectopterygoid border. They are slightly longer than the maxillary suture, nearly as wide as the base of the palatines, and wider than the palatines at the middle. The internal narial aperture is broken away anteriorly, but is evi- dently round, and not expanded from side to side as in porosus.

Premaxillaries. The premaxillaries are much narrower than in porosus, and barely meet behind the narial aperture, over the nasal process. Their posterior extensions are acute. On the palate their greatest length is once and a half their combined width. The maxil- lary-premaxillary suture is weakly produced backward, not reaching the second maxillary tooth.

Maxillaries. The maxillaries are elongate and their ectoptery- goid suture does not reach the tenth maxillary tooth. They are very little expanded at the fifth tooth. There is only a trace of the ridge on the dorsal surface along their suture with the nasals, so character- istic of porosus.

Nasals. The nasals are more elongate than in porosus, and their sutures with the lacrymals even shorter. They are separated posteri- orly by a very acute process of the frontal.

i8o FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY ZOOLOGY, VOL. XII.

Lacrymals. These bones are proportionately shorter and wider than in porosus, in contrast with the form of other bones. They bear a prominent obtuse ridge, below which is a deep pit. Their nasal suture is extremely short.

Pref rentals. The prefrontals are also less elongate than in poro- sus. Their share of the orbital border is about equal to that of the lacrymals.

Frontal. The frontal differs in outline from that of porosus in its angularity. Mook describes the acuminate forward process as pre- sent in one of his specimens of porosus. The suture with the pre- frontals falls much in advance of the center of the orbits.

Postorbitals. The postorbitals are smaller than those of porosus, and their suture with the frontal falls farther back on the orbits.

Squamosals. Similar to those of porosus.

Parietal. Similar to that of- porosus, but the width at the con- striction exceeds the width of the lateral part of the squamosal on the cranial table.

Supraoccipital. The supraogipital occupies a very small tri- angular space on the cranial table.

Quadrates, Basioccipitals, Exoccipitals,and Basis phenoid. These bones are more slender in novae-guineae than in porosus.

Quadratojugals. The quadratojugals are parallel sided, not nar- rowed anteriorly. The spine is close to the jugal.

Jugals. The jugals are notably slender in proportion when com- pared with those of porosus.

Palatines. These bones present the most striking characteristics of the new species. They are narrow, little wider at the pterygoid suture than at the middle, sharp pointed in front. Their suture with the pterygoids is anterior to the posterior extension of the palatine fenestrae. There is no trace of the bulbous posterior expansion shown by the palatines in porosus.

Pterygoids. The lack of the superior expansion of porosus is the most notable difference, together with the broad entry into the pala- tine fenestrae, and minor differences in outline.

Ectopterygoids. These bones present an obtusely angular inner border. They do not extend as far forward as the tenth maxillary tooth.

NEW CROCODILE FROM NEW GUINEA SCHMIDT 181

Mandibles. The mandible of novae-guineae is slender in com- parison with that of porosus. The symphysis between the two rami extends to a point midway between the fifth and sixth teeth.

No. 13092 No. 2854

Tip of snout to supraoccipital I5omm 271 mm

Tip of snout to ends of quadrates 160 303

Tip of snout to anterior border of orbits 94.4 183

Width of snout at base 43.7 89.4

Width of snout at 5th maxillary tooth 32.1 63.0

Greatest width of premaxillaries 21.2 45.7

Width of skull across quadratojugals 68.2 133.7 Least width of frontal between orbits 8.2 19.0

Length of orbit 26.6 41.3

Width of orbit at middle 22.2 33.0

Width of cranial table behind 44.0 82.8

Width of cranial table in front 37.3 65.3

Length of premaxillary suture on palate 31.8 55.5

Length of maxillary suture 30.0 60.3

Length of palatine suture 55-O 95-6 Length of pterygoid suture 43.9

Width of palatines at base 12.6 25.7 Least width of palatines 9.7 18.8

Width of palatine fenestrae 11.9 24.0

Length of palatine fenestrae 34.7 63.5

Length of mandibles 335

Length of mandibular symphysis 53.7

REFERENCES

BOULENGER, GEORGE ALBERT

1889. "Catalogue of the Chelonians, Rhynchocephalians, and Crocodiles in the British Museum (Natural History)." London: Printed by order of the Trustees. 8vo., pp. X, 311, 6 pis., 72 textfigs.

LONGMAN, HEBER A.

1925. "Crocodilus johnsoni Krefft." Mem. Queensland Mus., 8, p. 95-102, pis. 23-24.

MOOK, CHARLES C.

1921. "Skull Characters of Recent Crocodilia with Notes on the Affinities of the Recent Genera." Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 44, p. 123-268, 14 textfigs.

1923. "Skull Characters of Alligator sinensis Fauvel." idem, 48, p. 553-562, 2 textfigs.

ROOIJ, NELLY de

1915. "The Reptiles of the Indo-Australian Archipelago I Lacertilia, Chelonia, Emydosauria." Leiden: E. J. Brill, Ltd. 8vo. p. XIV, 384, 132 textfigs.

SCHMIDT, KARL P.

1924. "Notes on Central American Crocodiles." Field Mus. Nat. Hist. Publ., Zool. Series, 12, p. 77-92, pi. 5-9.

3 19$

FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY. ZOOLOGY, VOL. XII, PLATE XIII.

DORSAL VIEW OF SKULL OF Crocodilus novae-guineae, F. M.N.H. NO. 2854, X 1/3.

THE UBRAHY

OF IHE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS

FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY.

ZOOLOGY, VOL. XII, PLATE XIV.

PALATAL VIEW OF SKULL OF Crocodilus novae-guineae, F. M.N.H. NO. 2854, X 1/3.

THE

Of \HE Of

THE L'BRAftV

OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS

UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS-URBANA

-

.

'•