D)D »)) D TDD ID »»») yy DDD») > DIP PD» >») J =D») ) >>) »>) D> p>» Tp » SS ANAAA 2 NAARAAA NARAAAS ARAAAA lane AAAAA AAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAYaA p NAR AAR \A RAAAA AAAAAA 2 Bi 6 ARAABARAAAAAARR | >» DP _ yyy Me “yy »J ) > >». > ») ) LEC € CC Ca KC « C « CQ ‘ [CXC @ aC & (CECE SE (CEC © ( [ad (@ KE LAr NAV OVA ta 4G ( « KG Ci L¢ qi aA AAAAA ANNAN A ~ ia 2 WT aAAR 7 AAAAAAAAAAARRAAAAAARAAAAAAR oP : : NA AIAAN =\ " (VY \ | ! A = ‘a’, ~ AIA NA = A y | a fan\/an\ (an\ am OA ~~ meg al AZ VaiAsaiais ) JIAAiAiaAlala|.| aia VA A AIAIAIAAYa y AA 4 | | 4 | a \ J aAAAA : A) 4 f = ~ > E la y ~ =| = \ gan am 7 >) (ame \ ean Vi =\ |= \1ES x NY \ AAA ant F a om | ale iol Y WAV A IAI AIAVAVNAY AA) NO AAA = AY an \ A NAAAAAAAAA WAN Vial haan A AARAARARARAARAAAAY IE a2 z AX - AIA AVAV.V VAIAIAIA _ D YYW? A‘ Ns AAAra = WA q sae MNS VNAIAL VV Y : a cy a 2 1a) QD : AA AAARAARIY AAP V ARE ~ ~ = = t ! aA = WAVE } yy ~_ = = . j ~ ~ = ~ = AA y y \) if j . | | | | | | | al | ARRARRARRARARA ARRAA AAA AAA) A SS ] BUREAU 0! i AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY. } 10420 LIBRARY PNew-England’s RARITIES DISCOVERED. By ¥OHN FOSSELYN, Gent. NEW-ENGLAND’S RARITIES. ose { i \ \ i = 4 NEW-ENGLAND’S hee 1 TOS DISCOVERED IN BIRDS, BEASTS, FISHES, SERPENTS, AND PLANTS OF PREVA COUINIREYE By JOHN FOSSELYN, Gent. 10420 | : THith an Entrodvuction and Notes, By EDWARD TUCKERMAN, M.A. Boston: Wikia leAGMi VeE ALZlons MDCCCLXYV. Va Wau | SSRIS MAO he yee % Dee Al ttceh be ie * Seventy-five Copies printed, fledium Quarto. — Bete ee BOSTON: PRESS OF JOHN WILSON AND SON. — @| N the reproduction of this quaint and curious treatise, which is one of the earliest, on the Natural History of New England, it has been the intention of the Publisher to en- hance its value as a literary curiosity, by making it as nearly as possible an exact Fac-simile of the original edition, in accordance with the projected plan of a series of reprints, in which the present work is comprised. In the furtherance of this intention, the precise orthog- raphy, punctuation, and also the arrangement, — with the exception of the commencement and termination of pages, — have been preserved. The valuable Introduction and Notes of Prof. Tuck- ERMAN, incorporated in this edition, have been previously vill Publisher’s Anbertisement. issued in vol. iv. of “The Transactions of the American Antiquarian Society,” which contains a reprint of “The Rarities ” in a more modern style. The notes have, how- ever, undergone a thorough revision by the author; and some few additions have been made by him, during the progress of the present edition through the press. Some additional matter concerning the Genealogy of the Josselyn Family may be found contained in the Preface of the “ Two Voyages to New England in 1638 and 1663, by John Josselyn,” published in uniform style with the present work. BOSTON, May 15, 1865. Fevg|R. JOHN JOSSELYN, the writer of j| this book, was only brother, as he fays, to Henry Joflelyn, Efq., many years of Black Point in Scarborough, Me.; and both were fons to Sir Thomas Joffelyn, Criistoed 3} Knt., of Kent, whofe name is at the head of the new charter obtained by Sir Ferdinando Gorges for his Province in 1639, but who did not come to this country. Mr. Henry Joffelyn was at Pifcataqua, in the intereft of Capt. John Mafon, at leaft as early as 1634; but, in 1636, he is one of the Council of Gorges’s Province in Maine, and continued in that part of the country the reft of his life. He fucceeded in 1643, by the will of Capt. Thomas Cammock, to his patent at Black Point, and foon after married his widow. He is afterwards Deputy-Governor of the Province; and until 1676, when the Indians attacked and compelled him to furrender his fort, he was, fays Mr. Willis, — whofe valuable papers are cited below, — one of the moft active A 2 Family of John Josselvn. and influential men in it;” holding, “during all the changes of proprietorfhip and government, the moft im- portant offices.” He is then a magiftrate of the Duke of York’s Province of Cornwall, and, as late as 1680, a refi- dent of Pemaquid; when he is fpoken of, in a letter of Gov. Andros to the commander of the fort at Pemaquid, as one “whom I would have you ufe with all fitting re{pet, confidering what he hath been and his age.” He is living in 1682; but had died before the roth of May, 1683,' leaving no defcendants. ? Notwithftanding the evidence, above afforded, of the focial pofition of the family of which Henry and John Joffelyn were members, the prefent writer failed in tracing it, doubtlefs from not knowing in which county it had its principal feat. In this uncertainty, it occurred to him to make application to the eminent Englifh an- tiquary, — the Rev. Jofeph Hunter, Vice-Prefident of the Society of Antiquaries of London,—to whom he was indebted for former kind attentions; and was favored by this gentleman with fuch dire¢tions as left nothing to be defired. “The Jofflines,’ writes Mr. Hunter (“the name is written in fome variety of ortho- 1 Willis, in N. E. Geneal. Register, vol. ii. p. 204; and New Series of the same, vol. i. p. 31. Williamson, Hist. of Maine, vol. i. p. 682. 2 Dr. T. W. Harris, in N. E. Geneal. Register, vol. ii. p. 306, has corrected the mistake of Williamson and other writers as to Henry Josselyn of Scituate’s being of kin to Mr. Josselyn of Black Point; and Mr. Willis, who had adopted the same error in his first paper, already cited, now admits, in his second, that there is not ‘‘ any evidence that” the proprietor of Black Point ‘left any children, or ever had any.” Family of John Josselvn. 3 graphies, and now more ufually Joceline), are quite one of the old ariftocratic families of England, having feve- ral knights in the early generations; being admitted ‘into the order of baronets, and fubfequently into the peerage. ... Their main fettlement was in Hertford- fhire, at or near the town of Sabridgeworth; and ac- counts of them may be read in the hiftories— of which Chauncy’s, Salmon’s, and Clutterbuck’s are the chief— of that county. But a fuller and better account is to be found in the ‘Peerage of Ireland, by Mr. Lodge, keeper of the records in the Birmingham Tower, Dub- lin: 4 vols. 8vo, 1754.” ; According to Lodge, the family begins with a Sir Egidius, who paffed into England in the time of Ed- ward the Confeffor, and was defcended from “Carolus Magnus, King of France, with more certainty than the houfes of Lorraine and Guife.” Of this Sir Egidius was Sir Gilbert de Jocelyn, who accompanied the Conqueror, and had Gilbert— called St. Gilbert, being canonized by Pope Innocent III. in 1202 —and Geoffry. To this Geof- fry is traced back John Jocelyn, living in 1226; who mar- ried Catherine, fecond daughter and co-heir to Sir Thomas Battell, and had Thomas, who married Maud, daughter and co-heirefs of Sir John Hide, of Hide Hall in Sa- bridgeworth, county of Hertford, Knt., by his wife Eliza- beth, daughter of John Sudeley, Baron Sudeley, in the county of Gloucefter. He had Thomas Jocelyn, Efq., who 1 Letter of Rev. J. Hunter, 12th April, 1859. 4 Family of John Josselon, married Joan, daughter of John Blunt, and had Ralph, who married Maud, daughter of Sir John Sutton alzas Dudley, and had Geofiry of Hide Hall, 1312. Geoffry married Margaret, daughter of Robert Rokell or Rochill, and had Ralph, who married Margaret, daughter and heir to John Patmer, Esq., and had Geoffry (died 1425), who married Catherine, daughter and heir to Sir Thomas Bray, and had four fons and two daughters. Of thefe, the eldeft was Thomas Jocelyn, Efq., living in the reign of Edward IV., who married Alice, daughter of Lewis Duke of Dukes in Effex, Efq., by his wife Anne, daughter of John Cotton, Efq., and had iffue George, his heir, called Jocelyn the Courtier, who married Maud, daughter and heir to Edmond Bardolph,— Lord Bardolph,— and had one daughter and three fons. John Jocelyn, Efq., — “auditor of the augmentations, upon the diffolution of the abbeys by King Henry VIII.,’— was fon and heir to the laft- mentioned George, and married Philippa, daughter of William Bradbury, of Littlebury in Effex; by whom he had Sir Thomas, of Hide Hall, — created a Knight of the Bath at the coronation of King Edward VI.,— who mar- ried Dorothy, daughter of Sir Geoffry Gales or Gates, Knt., and had iffue;* one daughter marrying Roger Har- lakenden, of Carnarthen in Kent, Efq.; and the fifth fon being Henry Jocelyn, Efq., who married Anne, daughter 1 See also a Pedigree of Joselyne from the Visitation of Hertfordshire in 1614, furnished by Mr. S.G. Drake to the New-England Genealogical Register, vol. xiv. p- 16. This is probably one of the sources from which Lodge’s account was de- rived. Family of John Josselon. 5 and heir to Humphrey Torrell, otherwife Tyrrell, of Tor- | rell’s Hall in Effex,— became seated there, and had fix fons and fix daughters. The fecond fon of this family was Sir Thomas Jocelyn (father to our author), who was twice married. His firft wife was Dorothy, daughter of John Frank, Efg.; by whom he had fix fons and five daugh- ters, — Torrell, born 28th May, 1690; Henry, and Henry, both died infants; Thomas, who died without iffue, in 1635, at Bergen op Zoom; Edward, who, by a lady of Georgia, had a daughter Dorothy, and died at Smyrna in 1648; Benjamin, born 19th May, 1602; Anne, married to William Mildmay, Efq., by whom fhe had Robert, John, Anne, and Elizabeth; Dorothy, married to John Brewfter, Efq., and left no iffue; Elizabeth, married to Francis Neile, Efq., and had Francis, John, and Mary; Frances, born 26th March, 1600, and married Rev. Clement Vincent; and Mary, died unmarried. The fecond wife of Sir Thomas Jocelyn was Theodora, daughter to Edmond Cooke, of Mount Mafchall in Kent, Efq.; and by her he had Henry, John, Theodora, and Thomazine. ‘Torrell, the eldeft fon, married, firft, Elizabeth, daughter of Sir Rich- ard Brooke of Chefhire, — heir to her grandfather (by the mother), Dr. Chaderton, Bifhop of Lincoln, — by whom he had a daughter, Theodora, married to Samuel Fortrie, Efgq.,’ to whom our author dedicates the prefent volume, with acknowledgment of the “bounty” of his “honored — friend and kinfman.” 1 Lodge, Peerage of Ireland, vol. iii. p. 65, and az¢e. 6 Povages of John Josselon. The principal line of the family was continued by Rich- ard, heir to Sir Thomas of Hide Hall; the faid Richard being brother to our author, John Joffelyn’s grandfather. In 1665, Sir Robert Jocelyn of Hide Hall was advanced to the dignity of baronet. The fifth fon of this Sir Robert was Thomas; whofe fon, Robert Jocelyn, Efq., was bred to the law; was Solicitor-General and Attorney-General and Lord High Chancellor of, Ireland; and created, in 1743, Baron Newport of Newport, and Vifcount Jocelyn in 1755. Robert, fon and fucceffor of this nobleman, was created, in 1771, Earl of Roden, of High Roding, County of Tipperary; and was anceftor to the prefent Lord Roden." Our author, John Joffelyn, made his firft voyage to New England in 1638; arriving in Bofton Harbor the 3d of July, and remaining with his brother at Black Point till the toth of October of the following year. While at Bofton, he paid his refpeéts to the Governor and to Mr. Cotton, being the bearer to the latter of fome poetical pieces from the poet Quarles; and, as he fays, “being civilly treated by all I had occafion to converfe with.” In the account of his firft voyage, there is no appearance of that diflike to the Maffachufetts government and people which is obferv- able in the narrative of the fecond, and may there not unfairly be conneéted with his brother’s political and reli- gious differences with Maflachufetts.2 His fecond voyage 1 Lodge, wbz supra. Annual Register, 1771, p. 174. 2 But there is no doubt that the author was himself as far from sharing in the serious English thought of the Puritans of Massachusetts Bay as he was from x Povages of John Josselvn. 7 was made in 1663. He arrived at Nantasket the 27th of July, and foon proceeded to his brother’s plantation, where he tells us he ftaid eight years, and got together the matter of the book before us. This was firft printed in 1672, but occurs alfo with later dates. It was followed, in 1674, by * An Account of Two Voyages to New England; wherein you have the Setting-out of a fhip, with the Charges; the a joining in their evangelical faith. Yet there is hardly more than one place in either of his books (Voyages, pp. 180-2) where this is offensively brought forward. It is worthy of remark, however, that Josselyn’s family, in England, was attached rather to the Puritan side. ‘‘ His family connections,” says Mr. Hunter, in the letter already referred to, ‘‘ appear to have been adherents to the cause of the Parliament; particularly the Harlakendens, in whose regiment a Jocelyn, named Ralph, was a chaplain.” Nor is this all. ‘In the year 1663,” coritinues the learned authority just cited, ‘‘there was a slight insurre@tionary movement in the North; which was easily put down by the government, and the leaders exe- cuted. In a manuscript list of persons who were either openly engaged, or who were vehemently suspected of being favorers of the design, I find in the latter class the name of Capt. John Jossline.” This plot was not discovered till January, 1664; and our John Josselyn ‘‘ departed from London,” as he says at page one of this volume, ‘‘upon an invitation of my only brother,” the 28th of May of the year previous. But, if it be possible that our author was the person intended in the manuscript list as one strongly suspected of being engaged in a design against the Royal Government, the evident uncertainty of this is too great to permit us to discredit his own exposure of his political leanings, —as in the Voyages, p. 197, where, speaking of Sir F. Gorges, he says, ‘‘ And, when he was between three and fourscore years of age, did personally engage in our royal martyr’s service, and particularly in the siege of Bristow; and was plundered and im- prisoned several times, by reason whereof he was discountenanced by the pre- tended Commissioners for Forraign Plantations,” and so forth,—or in the face of another passage to be quoted further on, in which he acknowledges ‘the bounty of his royal sovereigness,” to question the sincerity — which there is nothing in either of his books to throw doubt upon — of his general adhesion to the Royalist side. ‘‘The family in Hertfordshire,” says Mr. Hunter, ‘‘ were non- conformists; but the spirit of nonconformity seems to have spent itself at the death of Sir Strange Jocelyn, the second baronet, who died in 1734. But we may trace the Puritan influence in the present Earl of Roden, who is a conspicuous tember of the religious body in England called the Evangelical.” — Ms. ut sup. 8 Povages of John Josselon. Prices of all Neceffaries for furnifhing a Planter and his Family at his firft Coming; a Defcription of the Country, Natives, and Creatures; the Government of the Countrey as it is now pofleffed by the Englifh, &c. A large Chron- ological Table of the moft Remarkable Paflages, from the firftt Difcovering of the Continent of America to the Year 1673.”. I2mo, pp. 279. Reprinted in the third volume ot the Third Series of the Collections of the Hiftorical So- ciety; which edition is quoted here. A large part of the “Voyages” is taken up with obfervations relating to natu- ral hiftory; and it is quite likely that the author tried in this fecond work to fupply fome of the defects of his “ Rarities.” Compare efpecially the accounts of beafts of the earth, of birds, and of fifhes; each of which is better done in the “ Voyages.” Joffelyn was, it appears, a man of polite reading. He qucetes Lucan, Pliny, and Du Bartas; he has Latin and Italian proverbs; he is acquainted with the writings of Mr. Perkins, that famous divine; with Van Helmont; with Sandys’s “Travels,” and Capt. John Smith’s. His curiofity in picking up “excellent medecines ” points to an acquaintance with phyfic; of his practifing which, there occur, indeed (pp. 48, 58, 63), feveral inftances.’ Nor is 1 And see the Voyages, p, 187, for an account of a ‘‘ Barbarie-Moor under cure” of the author, when he “ perceived that the Moor had one skin more than Englishmen. The skin that is basted to the flesh is bloudy, and of the same Azure colour with the veins, but deeper than the colour of our Europeans’ veins. Over this is an other skin, of a tawny colour, and upon that [the] Zfzdermzs, or Cuticula, — the flower of the skin, which is that Snake’s cast; and this is tawny also. The colour of the blew skin mingling with the tawny, makes them appear Povages of John Josselvn. 9 he, by any means, uninterefted in prefcriptions for the kitchen; as fee his elaborate reczfe for cooking eels (Voyages, p. 111), and alfo that (2dzd., p. 190) for a com- pound liquor “that exceeds faffada, the Nectar of the country;” which is made, he tells us, of “Syder, Maligo- Raifons, Milk, and Syrup of Clove-Gilliflowers.” But his curiofity in natural hiftory, and efpecially in botany, is his chief merit; and this now gives almoft all the value that is left to his books. William Wood, the author of “ New-England’s Profpe&t” (Lendon, 16347), was a bet- ter obferver, generally, than Joffelyn; but the latter makes up for his other fhort-comings by the particularity of his botanical information. The “ Voyages” was Joffelyn’s laft appearance in print. He was already advanced in years, and alludes to this at page 69 of the prefent book, where he fays he fhall refer the further inveftigation of a curious plant—of which a neighbor, “ wandering in the woods to find out his ftrayed cattle,’ had brought him a fragment—“to thofe that are younger, and better able to undergo the pains and trouble of finding it out.” “Henceforth,” he declares in his “Voyages,” p. 151, “you are to expect no more Relations black.” Dr. Mitchell, the botanist of Virginia, has a paper upon the same topic, —the cause of the negro’s color, —in the Philosophical Transactions; but this appears less in accordance with more recent researches (Prichard, Nat. Hist. of Man, p. 81) than Josselyn’s observations. 1 “* Fis book is a curiosity, sometimes worth examining, but seldom to be im- plicitly relied on.” — Savage, in Winthrop, N. E., vol. i. p. 267, note. 2 Reprinted, the third edition, with an introductory essay and some notes; Boston, 1764,—the edition made use of in these notes. B IO Garly Botanical Writers. from me. I am now return’d into my Native Countrey; and, by the providence of the Almighty and the bounty of my Royal Soveraigness, am difpofed to a holy quiet of ftudy and meditation for the good of my foul; and being blefled with a tranfmentitation or change of mind, and weaned from the world, may take up for my word, oz of mortale guod opto.” We may fuppofe that a rude acquaintance with the more common or important animals of a new country will commence with the difcovery of it. Thus the beginning of European knowledge of the marine animals of Ameri- ca goes back, doubtlefs, to the earlieft fifheries of New- foundland; and thefe began almoft immediately after the difcovery of the continent. Game and peltry were alfo likely to come to the knowledge of the earlieft adven- turers; and {fcattered among thefe, from the firft, were doubtlefs men capable of regarding the world of new objecéts around them with an intelligent, if not a literate eye. Defcriptions in this way, and {pecimens, at length reached Europe, and became known to the learned there —to Gefner, Clufius, and Aldrovandus — from as early as ’ the middle of the fixteenth century. Without being naturalifts, fuch obfervers as Heriot in Virginia (1585-6) and Wood in Maffachufetts (1634) could give valuable accounts of what they faw; and more, it may well be, was due to the Chriftian miffionaries, who accompanied or followed the adventurers, for the converfion of the heathen. Gabriel Sagard was one of thefe miffionaries, a vecolle¢ or reformed Francifean monk, who went from Paris to Early Botanical Writers. II Canada in 1624, and fpent two years in the country of the Hurons; publifhing his “Grand Voyage du Pays des Hu- rons” in 1632, and enlarging it in 1636 to “ Hiftoire du Canada et Voyages que les Freres Mineurs recollets y ont faits pour la Converfion des Infidelles,” &c., in four books; of which the third treats of natural hiftory,’ and is cited by Mefirs. Audubon and Bachmann (Vivip. Quadrupeds of N.A., pafim) for a good part of our more common and noticeable Wammaha. Something confiderable thus got to be known of marine animals of all forts, and of quadrupeds. But it was much longer before our birds — if we except a very few, as the blue-jay and the turkey — came to the fcientific knowledge of Europeans; and this remark is, as might be expected, at leaft equally true of our reptiles. Quite as accidental, doubtlefs, was the beginning of European acquaintance with our plants. There are, in- deed, traces of the knowledge of a few at a very early period. Dalechamp, Clufius, Lobel, and Alpinus — all authors of the fixteenth century — muft be cited occafion- ally in any complete fynonymy of our /Vora. - The Indian- corn, the fide-faddle flower (Sarracenia purpurea and © S. flava), the columbine, the common milk-weed (4/- clepias Cornuti), the everlafting (Antennaria margarita- cea), and the Arbor vite, were known to the juft-men- tioned botanifts before 1600. Sarracenia flava was fent either from Virginia, or poffibly from fome Spanifh monk 1 Biographie Universelle, zx loco. We 12 Early Botanical CAriters. in Florida. Clufius’s figure of our well-known northern S. purpurea — of which he gives, however, only the leaves and bafe of the ftem (Clus. Hit. Pl, cit. Gerard a Johnfon) — was derived from a fpecimen furnifhed to him by one Mr. Claude Gonier, apothecary at Paris, who him- felf had it from Lifbon; whither we may fuppofe it was carried by fome fifherman from the Newfoundland coatt. The evening primrofe (Cexothera biennis) was known in Europe, according to Linnzeus, as early as 1614. Folygo- num fagittatum and artfolium (tear-thumb) were figured by De Laet, probably from New-York {fpecimens, in his “Novus Orbis,” 1633. Johnfon’s edition of Gerard’s “ Herbal” (1636) —which was poffibly our author’s manu- al in the ftudy of New-England plants — contains fome dozen North-American fpecies, furnifhed often from the garden of Mr. John Tradefcant, who had other plants from “Virginia” befide the elegant one which bears his name; and John Parkinfon — whofe “Theatrum Botanicum ” (1640) is declared by Tournefort to embrace a larger number of fpecies than any.work which had gone before it — defcribes, efpecially from Cornuti, a ftill larger num- ber. But the firft treatife efpecially concerned with North-American plants was that of the French author juft mentioned; which, on feveral accounts, deferves particu- lar attention. John Robin—“fecond to none,” fays Tournefort, “in the knowledge and cultivation of plants” — was placed in charge of the Royal Botanical Garden at Paris, about the year 1570; and Vefpafian Robin, “a moft diligent Early Botanical Writers. 11g botanift,” followed, in fimilar conneétion’ with the larger garden founded by Lewis the Thirteenth. Both are faid to have affifted the writer whofe book we are to notice; but efpecially the latter,’ who, there is little doubt, de- ferves credit for all the American fpecies defcribed in it. The hiftory of Canadian and other new plants — “ Cana- denfium Plantarum, aliarumque nondum editarum Hifto- ria” of Jacobus Cornuti, Doétor of Medicine, of Paris — was printed in that city (pp. 238) in 1635, under the patronage juft mentioned; and contains accounts, accom- panied, in every cafe but one, with figures on copper, of thirty-feven of our plants; of which the meadow-rue is known to botanifts as Thalctrum Cornutz; and the com- mon milkweed, as Asclepias Cornutz. Though himself not eminent as a botanift,? the work of Cornuti was valua- 1 He is called Botanicus Regius by Cornuti, p. 22; and the same title is given to both the Robins, in the printed catalogue of plants cultivated by them. Tournefort indicates the office of Vespasian Robin, at the new Botanic Garden, as follows: ‘‘ Brosseus . . . primus Horti prefectus, studiosis plantas indigitandi numeri przposuit Vespasianum Robinum diligentissimum Botanicum.” — Zus¢. Rei Herb., vol. i. p. 48. And the recent writer in the Biographie Universelle, says, more expressly, that the royal ordonnance establishing the garden names Vespasian Robin ‘‘sub-demonstrator” of botany, with a stipend of two hundred francs yearly. According to this writer, the two Robins were not, as has been said, father and son, but brothers; and Vespasian the elder. This one must have reached a great age, as the celebrated Morrison, who visited France in 1640, and remained there twelve years, calls himself his disciple. — Brog. Universelle, ix loco. 2 Tournefort, ubz supra. ® Cornuti autem parum fuit in plantarum cognitione versatus, ut manifestum est ex ineptis appellationibus quibus utitur in Enchiridio Botanico Parisiensi, et descriptionibus speciosis-ab Herbariorum stylo tamen alienis. — Tourzef. Inst., vol. i. p. 43. Compare, as to the botanical merits of Cornuti, the writer in Biog- raphie Uniyerselle, who says that Cornuti’s terminology, to which Tournefort 14 Early Botanical Writers. ble for its elegant prefentation of much that was new; and it will always deferve honorable remembrance in the hif- tory of our “Vora. There are feveral pafflages of it— as at pp. 5 and 7, and in the account of the two baneberries at p. 76, where we read, “Opacis et fylveftribus locis in eadem Americ parte frequentiffimum eft geminum ge- nus ” — which look a little like a proper botanical collec- tor’s notes on his fpecimens; and thefe {fpecimens, and the others from the fame region, may well have been refults of the herborizing of that worthy Francifcan miffionary, whofe early obfervations on the natural hiftory of Canada have been. mentioned already above. Nor were the North-American plants poffeffed by Cornuti entirely con- fined to this region; for he fpeaks at the end (p. 214) of his having received a root, ex xotha Angha, as he,ftrangely calls it, known, it appears, by the name of Serfentarza, or, in the vernacular, Szagroe/,—a fure remedy for the bite of a huge and moft pernicious ferpent zx nxotha Angha, — which was no doubt the fnake-root fo famous once as a cure for the bite of a rattlefnaké, and one of the numerous varieties of Madbalus albus (Lu.) Hook., if not, as Purfh fuppofed, what is now the var. Serpentarza, Gray. But fome view of the fcantinefs of {cientific knowledge of our flora, near forty years after Cornuti, may be had by reck- oning the number of f{pecies for which Bauhin’s “ Pinax” took exception, was that of Lobel; and farther, that the-catalogue — Enchiridium Botanicum Parisiense — which is annexed to Cornuti’s larger work, is in several respects creditable to him. — Biog. Univ., in loco. Josselon as a Botanist. 15 and “ Prodromus” (1671) are cited by Linnzus in the “Species Plantarum.” Moft of them are Southern plants; and the few decidedly Northern ones which meet us—as Cornus Canadenfis, Uvularia perfoliata, Trillium erectum, Arum triphyllum,.and Adtantum pedatum — are all indi- cated, by Bauhin’s phrafe, as from Brazil! We have nothing illuftrating the Alora of New England from Cornuti till Joffelyn. In Virginia, Mr. John Banifter, a correfpondent of Ray’s, began to botanize probably not long after the middle of the feventeenth century. He was fucceeded by feveral eminent names; as Mark Catesby, F.R.S. (born 1679), John Clayton, Efq. (born 1685), and John Mitchell, M.D., F.R.S.,—a contemporary of the other two,— who together gave to the botany of Virginia a diftinguifhed luftre; as did Cadwalader Colden, Efq. (born 1688), —a feleGtion from whofe correfpondence has been lately edited by Dr. Gray, —to that of New York; John Bartram (born 1701), “ American botanift to his Britannic Majefty,” to that of Pennfylvania; and, fome- what later, Alexander Garden, M.D., F.R.S. (born 1728), to that of South Carolina. Joflelyn himfelf is, indeed, little more than a herbalift; but it is enough that he gets beyond that entirely unfcientific charaéter. He certainly botanized, and made botanical ufe of Gerard and his other authorities. The credit belongs to him of indicating feveral genera as new which were fo, and peculiar to the American Flora. It may at leaft be faid, that, at the time he wrote, there is no reafon to fuppofe that any other perfon knew as much as he did of the botany of New 16 Josselun as a Botanist. England. “The plants in New England,” he fays in his “Voyages,” p. 59, “for the variety, number, beauty, and virtues, may ftand in competition with the plants of any countrey in Europe. Johnfon hath added to Gerard’s ‘Herbal’ three hundred, and Parkinfon. mentioneth many more. Had they been in New England, they might have found a thoufand, at leaft, never heard of nor feen by any Englifhman before.”’ Nor did our author fail to adorn his “ Rarities” with recognizable figures, as well as de- fcriptions, of fome of thefe new American plants; and 1 Mention of New-England plants may be found in earlier writers than Cor- nuti or Josselyn; but what is said is now rarely available. Gosnold’s expedition was in 1602; and the writer of the account of it tells us that the island upon which his party proposed to settle (Cuttyhunk, one of the Elizabeth Islands) was covered with ‘‘oaks, ashes, beech, walnut, witch-hazel, sassafrage, and cedars, with divers others of unknown names;” beside ‘‘ wild pease, young sassafrage, cherry-trees, vines, eglantine, gooseberry-bushes, hawthorn, honeysuckles, with others of the like quality;” as also ‘‘ strawberries, rasps, ground-nuts, alexander, surrin, tansy, &c., without count.” — Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. xxviii. p. 76. And so “the writer of Mourt’s Relation, in 1620, speaks of ‘‘ sorrel, yarrow, carvel, brook- ‘lime, liverwort, watercresses, &c., as noticed, ‘‘in winter,” however, at Plymouth. — Hist. Coll. vol. viii. p. 221. There is much here which is true enough, though the ‘“‘eglantine” of the first writer is an evident mistake, as doubtless also the ““carvel” of the other; but we have no reason to suppose that either of. these passages ever had any scientific value. Josselyn, so far as his Botany goes, does not belong to this class of writers. There are important parts of his account of our plants, in which we know with certainty what he intended to tell us; and, farther, that this was worth the telling. And the credit which fairly belongs to the new gezera of American plants, in some sort indicated by him, shall illustrate as well those other portions of his work where what he meant is a matter rather of deduction from his particulars, such as they are, in the light of his only here-and-there-cited authorities, than of plain fact. His English names — com- mon, and perhaps often indefinite, as they strike us—had more of scientific value, in botanical hands at least, when he wrote, than now; and, there is good reason to suppose, were meant to indicate that the plants intended, or in some cases the gexera to which they belonged, were the same with those published, under the same names, by Gerard, Johnson, and Parkinson. Josseluon as a Botanist. 17 his arrangement is alfo creditable to his botanical knowl- edge. By this arrangement, his collections are diftin- guifhed into — ** Such plants as are common with us in England.” . ** Such plants as are proper to the country.” . ** Such plants as are proper to the country, and have no name.” . * Such plants as have sprung up since the English planted and kept cattle in New England.” —& Oo WH The laft of thefe divifions is the moft valuable part of Joffelyn’s account, as it affords the only teftimony that there is to the firft notice among us of a number of now naturalized weeds, which it is an interefting queftion to feparate from the more important clafs of plants truly indigenous in, and common to, both hemifpheres; and the author’s treatment of the latter—as indeed of the other two lifts mentioned above — {hows that he was competent, in a meafure, to reckon the former. This furnifhes a date, and an early one; and there is no other till 1785, when Dr. Manaffeh Cutler’s Memoir, to be fpoken of, enables us to limit the appearance of fome other fpecies not men- tioned by Joffelyn. There is no work of any fize or importance on New- England plants, after Joffelyn, for the whole century which followed. We were not, indeed, without men in diftin- guifhed conneétion with the European {cientific world. The moft eminent New-England family gained honors in fcience, as well as in the condutt of affairs. John Win- throp the younger, eldeft fon of the firft Governor of Maffachufetts, — and the “heir,” fays Savage, “of all his Cc 18 Governor John Winthrop. father’s talents, prudence, and virtues, with a fuperior fhare of human learning,”’— was himfelf the firft Goy- ernor of Connecticut, and had, in this conneétion, a cer- tain f{cientific pofition and reputation. “The great Mr. Boyle, Bifhop Wilkins, with feveral other learned men,” fays Dr. Eliot, “had propofed to leave England, and eftab- lifh a fociety for promoting natural knowledge in the new colony of which Mr. Winthrop, their intimate friend and affociate, was appointed Governor. Such men were too valuable to lofe from Great Britain; and, Charles II. hav- ing taken them under his prote¢tion, the fociety was there eftablifhed, and obtained the title of the Royal Society of London. ... Mr. Winthrop fent over many fpecimens of the produétions of this country, with his remarks upon them: ‘and, by an order of the Royal Society, he was in a particular manner invited to take upon himfelf the charge of being the chief correfpondent in the Weft, as Sir Philiberto Vernatti was in the Eaft Indies.’ ‘His name,’ fays the fame writer, Dr. Cromwell Mortimer, Secretary of the Royal Society, in his flattering dedication of the forti- eth volume of the Philofophical Tranfactions to the Gov- ernor’s grandfon, ‘had he put it to his writings, would have been as univerfally known as the Boyles’s, the Wil- kins’s, and Oldenburghs’, and been handed down to us with fimilar applaufe.”* There is, in the volume of Philofophical Tranfaétions for 1670, “An Extra&t of a 1 Winthrop’s Journal, by Savage, edit. 1, vol. i. p. 64, note. See also Ban- croft’s character of the younger Winthrop, in History of the United States, vol. il. p. 52. 2 Eliot, Biog. Dict., 7 loco. Fits John Winthrop. 19 Letter written by John Winthrop, Efq., Governor of Con- neGticut in New England, to the Publifher, concerning fome “Natural Curiofities of thofe Parts; efpecially a very ftrange and curioufly-contrived Fith, fent for the Repofi- tory of the Royal Society ” (pp. 3); in which are men- tioned, as fent, fpecimens of {crub-oak; “bark of tree with fir-balfam, which grows’ in Nova Scotia, and, as I hear, in the more eafterly part of New England;” pods of milk-weed, “ufed to ftuff pillows and cufhions;” and “a branch of the tree called the cotton-tree, bearing a kind of down, which alfo is not fit to fpin.” Fitz John Winthrop, Efq., F.R.S. (died 1707), fon of the laft, and alfo Governor of Conneéticut, is faid to have been “famous for his philofophical” (that is, {cientific) -“knowledge.”* And the fecond Governor’s nephew, John Winthrop, Efq., F.R.S. (died 1747), who left this country and paffed the latter part of his life in England, is declared by the author of the dedication already above cited, to have “increafed the riches of their” (the Royal Society’s) “repofitory with more than fix hundred curious fpecimens, chiefly in the mineral kingdom; accompanied with an accurate account of each particular.” “Since Mr. Col- well,” it is added, “the founder of the Mufeum of the Royal Society, you have been the benefaétor who has given the moft numerous colleétion.” Dr. John Winthrop, F.R.S. (died 1779), Hollifian Profeflor of Mathematics at Cambridge, N.E., whofe important papers on aftronomical 1 Eliot, Biog. Di&., zx loco. 20 ChiefJSustice Dudlev. ~ and other related phenomena are to be found in the Philo- fophical Tranfaétions, was of another line of the fame family. ' Paul Dudley, Efq., F.R.S. (born 1675), fon of Gov. Jofeph Dudley, and himfelf Chief Juftice of Maffachufetts, was author of feveral papers in the Philofophical Tranf- actions; one of which is an’“ Account of the Poifon-wood Tree in New-England” (vol. xxxi. p. 135); and another, “Obfervations on fome Plants in New-England, with Remarkable Inftances of the Nature and Power of Vege- tation” (vol. xxxiii. p. 129). This laft is of only feven pages, and of little fcientific account: though we learn from it, that, in 1726, when Mr. Dudley wrote, the Pear- main, Kentifh Pippin, and Golden Ruffetin, were efteemed apples here, and the Orange and Bergamot cultivated pears;* that, in one town in 1721, they made three thou- fand, and in another near ten thoufand barrels of cider; and that, to fpeak of “trees of the wood,” he knew of a 1 Interleaved Almanacs of 1646-48, cited by Savage (Winthrop, N. E., vol. ii. p- 332), mention ‘‘ Tankard” and “‘ Kreton” (perhaps Kirton) apples, as well as Russetins, Pearmains, and Long-Red apples; beside ‘‘ the great pears,” and ap- ricots, as grown here. In the Records of the Governor and Company of the Massachusetts Bay (Records of Mass., vol. i. p. 24), there is an undated memo- randum, ‘*'To provide to send for Newe England . . . stones of all sorts of fruites; as peaches, plums, filberts, cherries, pear, aple, quince kernells,” &c., which the “ First General Letter of the Governor,” Xc., of the 17th April, 1629, again makes mention of (zéd., p. 392); and Josselyn (Voyages, p. 189) remarks on the ‘“‘ good fruit” reared from such kernels. But, if this were. the only source of our ancestors’ English fruit, the names which they gave to the seedlings must have been vague. — For other early notices of cultivated fruit-trees, see Savage Gen. Did. 4, p. 258, and the same, 4, p. 621. Saml. Sewall, jun. Esq., of Brook- line, had trees grafted with ‘Drew’s Russet,’ and ‘Golden Russet’ apples, in 1724. (Gen. Reg. 16, p. 65.) Reb. Jared Eliot. 21 button-wood tree which meafured nine yards in girth, and made twenty-two cords of wood; and of an afh, which, at a yard from the ground, was fourteen feet eight inches in girth. He alfo exprefles an intention to treat feparately the evergreens of New England; and this treatife, which was poffibly more valuable than the one juft noticed, was in the poffeffion of Peter Collinfon, the eminent patron of horticulture, and was given by him to J. F. Gronovius; but has not, that I am aware of, appeared in print. It is likely that the early phyficians of New England gave fpecial attention to thofe fimples of the country, the virtues of which were known to the favages; and perhaps it was partly in this way that the Rev. Jared Eliot (born 1685), minifter of Killingworth in Conneéticut, — who is called by Dr. Allen “the firft phyfician of his day,” — is alfo defignated, both by him and by Eliot, a botanift; and by the latter, “the firtt in New England.” ‘There is no doubt he was a friend of Dr. Franklin’s, and a fcientific agriculturift according to the knowledge of his day; and he is faid to have introduced the white mulberry into Conneéticut2 His Agricultural Effays went through more than one edition, but is now rare. Mr. Eliot died while our next character, the firft native New-England botanift who deferves the name, was a ftudent of Yale College. 1 Gronov. Fl. Virg., edit. 2. In Mr. Dillwyn’s (unpublished) ‘‘ Account of the Plants cultivated by the late Peter Collinson,” from his own catalogue and other manuscripts, I find Collinson quoting Mr. Dudley’s paper on Plants of New England, above mentioned; but not that on the Evergreens. — Hortus Collins., p- 41. ? Eliot, Biog. Di&., and Allen, Amer. Biog. Di&., zn locis. 22 Br. Manasseh Cutler. Manaffeh Cutler, LL.D. (born 1743), was minifter of the Hamlet in Ipfwich — afterwards incorporated as the town of Hamilton — fifty-one years, and was alfo a mem- ber of the Medical Society of Maffachufetts. He is author of “An Account of fome of the Vegetable Produétions naturally growing in this part of America, botanically arranged,” which makes nearly a hundred pages of the firft volume of the Memoirs of the American Academy, 1785. In the introduction to this paper, the author fpeaks of Canada and the Southern States having had attention given to their produétions, both by fome of their own inhabitants and by European naturalifts; while “that ex- tenfive tract of country which lies between them, includ- ing feveral degrees of latitude, and exceedingly diverfified in its furface and foil, feems {till to remain unexplored.” He attributes the negle¢t, in part, to this, —“that botany has never been taught in any of our colleges,” but princi- pally to the prevalent opinion of its unprofitableness in common life. ‘The latter error he combats with the then important obfervation, that, “though all the medicinal properties and economical ufes of plants are not discovera- ble from thofe characters by which they are fy{tematically arranged, yet the celebrated Linnzeus has found that the virtues of plants may be, in a confiderable degree, and moft fafely, determined by their zatural charatters: for plants of the fame zatural clafs are in some meature fimi- lar; thofe of the fame zxatuval order have a ftill nearer affinity; and thofe of the fame genus have very feldom been found to differ in their medical virtues” (p. 397). Br. Manasseh Cutler. 23 This fhows, perhaps, that Dr. Cutler appreciated (for the Ttalics in the juft-quoted pafflage are his own) that adum- bration of a natural fyftem which was afforded or fuggefted by the artificial; and his inftances—the Gramuznee, the Borraginacee, the Umbellifere, the Ladbiate, the Cruczfere, the Malyacee, the Compofite, &c.; though thefe are cited under the divifions, not of the natural, but of the fexual fyftem — are ftill more to the point. There are other obfervations of intereft; and the fuggeftion is made, that perfons fhould colleé& the plants of their diftri€ts, and fend them from time to time to the Academy. Dr. Cutler was thus, poflibly, the firft to fuggeft a bo- tanical chair in our colleges, and a general herbarium to illuftrate the /lora of New England; and perhaps it was this laft which led him to propofe a ftill more important undertaking. “It has long been my intention,” he fays in “a letter to Prof. Swartz, of Upfal, dated 15th October, 1802, “to publith a botanical work, comprifing the plants of the northern and eaftern States; and [I] have been colleéting materials for that purpofe. But numerous avo- cations, and a variety of other engagements, has occa- fioned delay. It is, however, ftill my intention, if my health permits, to do it. But, at this time, far lefs than in years patt, there is very little encouragement given here to publications of this kind.”? About three hundred and feventy plants are indicated in the publifhed “ Account” of Dr. Cutler. It was not to be 1 Mss. Cutler, Jenes me. 24 Br. fManasseh Cutler. expected, that, in this beginning, numerous miftakes fhould not be made. It could not poffibly have been otherwife. There is ftill evidence enough of the author’s genius, which perhaps needed only opportunity and encourage- ment to anticipate a*part of what botany now owes to a Nuttall, a Torrey, and a Gray. The “Account” was favorably received by other botanifts of the time, both in this country and abroad. In a letter of Muhlenberg to Cutler, dated 9th February, 1791, the former fays, “ Not till a few months ago, I was favored with the firft volume of the Memoirs of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, printed at Bofton, 1785. Amongft other valua- ble pieces, I found your ‘Account of Indigenous Vegeta- bles, botanically arranged;’ with which I was infinitely pleafed, as this was the firft work that gives a fy{tematical account of New-England plants. Being a great friend to botany, and having ftudied it in my leifure-hours upwards~ of fourteen years in Pennfylvania, I know the difficulty of arranging the American plants according to the Linnean fyftem; and I was always eager to hear of fome gentleman engaged in fimilar refearches, that, by joining hands, we ndght do fomething towards enlarging American Bota- ny.... This is the reafon why I intrude upon your leifure- hours, and crave for your acquaintance and friendfhip.”* Drs. Withering and Stokes, of England, were other cor- refpondents of Cutler, and furnifhed him with important obfervations upon his printed Memoir, befides {fpecimens; 1 Mss. Cutler, Zenxes me. Br. Manasseh Cutler. De as did alfo Swartz, and, it appears, Payfhull of Swe- den. Dr. Stokes followed up his various fuggeftions for the improvement of the Memoir, by propofing to ded- icate a plant, which he took to be new, to its author. “A plant,” he fays, “like a woolly heath, and which I wifhed to call Cuftleria ericotdes, turns out to be Hud- Sonia ericoides. 1 hope, however, your herborizations may furnifh a new genus for you, not likely to be difturbed.” — Letters of Stokes to Cutler, from “ Feb. 14, ’91, to Aug. iyi 93 Dt But Dr. Cutler’s printed memoir on the plants of New England is much furpaffed in intereft by his manufcript volumes of defcriptions, ftill extant. Thefe manufcript volumes commence with “ Book I., 1783,” and continue, fo far as I have feen them, to 1804. The late Mr. Oakes poffeffed fix of thefe books; and two were given to me by my valued friend, the late Dr. T. W. Harris. They are generally entitled, “ Defcriptions and Notes on American Indigenous Plants,” and contain a vaft number of obferva- tions and analyfes, fometimes accompanied by pen-and-ink sketches. -This was evidently the material accumulated for the author’s Flora above mentioned; and the following extraéts will ferve to fhow that he was in many refpects qualified to undertake fuch a work. Thus, in defcribing the feveral hickories, he points out thofe differences from Fuglans, upon which Nuttall afterwards conftituted his 1 Mss. Cutler, penes me. D 26 Br. fAanasseh Cutler. genus Carya. Again, in the fame volume,—that for - 1789, — there is a VV. Gen. Anonymos, minutely defcribed in feveral pages, which is no other than Thefum umbella- tum, L., afterwards diftinguifhed by Nuttall as his genus Comandra. Again, under Anonymos, Yellow-Sandbind, there is a full defcription of what Nuttall after named fTudfonia tomentofa. The fame volume fhows that the author had anticipated Prof. Gray in referring Orchzs Jjimbriata, as it was called by Purfh and other botanifts, to O. pfychodes, \.; and the remark is alfo made that O. lacera Michx.,— which Muhlenberg and our other writers had miftakenly referred to O. p/ychodes, till Dr. Gray cor- rected the error, — muft be a new fpecies,” which it then certainly was. Again, there is another Axomolos defcribed at length, which is the fame afterwards conftituted by Nuttall his genus Microffylis. So Campanula humida (Cutler mfs.) is what Purfh defignated, long after, C. aparinoides. Again, in another volume (for 1800), he anticipates Purfh by propofing for our water-fhield the name Lra/enia ovalifoha ; and, in yet another, he is before Bigelow in defcribing as a new fpecies what the latter, many years later, publifhed as Prunxus obovata. This may fuffice to indicate the merits of the botanift of Ipfwich Hamlet. A little fhrub-willow, with clean, fhining leaves, and modeft catkins, — inhabiting, almoft everywhere, the alpine regions of the White Mountains, and gathered by him there, before any other botanift had penetrated thofe folitudes, — ftill reminds us of his name, which deferves to be remembered by his countrymen. Dr. fManasseh Cutler. 24 After Cutler, there appeared nothing of importance’ on our botany, till the prefent elder fchool of New-England botanifts —a fchool charaéterized by the names of an Oakes, a Boott, and an Emerfon — was founded, now more than forty years ago, by the claflical /Zoriwla of Bigelow. 1 The late Dr. Waterhouse, Professor of Medicine at Cambridge, read lectures on Natural History to his classes as early as 1788, and published the botanical part of these lectures in the Monthly Anthology, 1804-8; reprinting this in 1811, with the title of the Botanist (Boston, Svo, pp. 228). In the preface to this vol- ume, the author’s are claimed to have been the first public leétures on Natural History given in the United States. The Massachusetts Professorship of Botany and Entomology was founded in 1805, and the Botanical Garden in 1807; but the eminent naturalist who first filled the chair left little behind him to bear witness to his acknowledged “‘learning and genius.” — Quincy, Hist. Harv. Univ., vol. ii. p- 330. The studies of Peck were not, however, confined to the Fauna and Flora of New England; and his distinguished successors in the lecture-room and the botanical garden — Mr. Nuttall, the late Dr. Harris, and Professor Gray — may be said to have maintained a like general, rather than local chara¢ter, in the entomological and botanical investigations pursued at the University. New-Englands Reever i i S Difcovered : IN : Birds, Beafts, Fifbes, Serpents, and Plants of that Country. Together with The Phyfical and Chyrurgical REMEDIES where- with the /Va¢zves conftantly ufe to Cure their DISTEMPERS, WouNDS, and SorRES. ALSO A perfeét De/cription of an Indian SQUA, in all her Bravery; with a POEM not improperly conferr’d upon her. LASTLY A CHRONOLOGICAL TABLE of the moft remarkable Paflages in that Country among{t the ENGLISH. lluftrated with CUTS. By JOHN FOSSELYN, Gent. London, Printed for G. Widdowes at the Green Dragon in St. Pauls Church yard, 1672. To the highly obliging, His Honoured Friend and Kinsman, SAMUEL FortTREY Efq; STIL, T was by your affiftance (enabling me) that I com- mencd a Voyage into thofe remote parts of the World (Znown to us by the painful Difcovery of that memorable Gentleman Sir Fran. Drake.) Your bounty then and Sormerly hath engaged a retribution of my Gratitude, and not knowing how to tefttfie the fame unto you other- wayes, I have (although with fome reluctancy) adven- tured to obtrude upon you thefe rude and indigefied Eight Years Observations, wherein whether I fhall more fhame my self or injure your accurate Fudgment and better Employment in the perufal, ts a queftion. 32 Epistle Dedicatory. We read of Kings and Gods that kindly took A Pitcher fill’d with Water from the Brook. The Contemplation whereof (well knowing your noble and generous Difpofttion) hath confirn’d in me the hope that you will pardon my prefumption, and accept the tender of the fruits of my Travel after this homely manner, and my felf as, S27, Your highly obliged, & mofe humble Servant, John Joffelyn. New-Englands here Lets Difcovered. fee) N the year of our Lord 1663. May 28. i] upon an Invitation from my only Brother, I departed from Lozdon, and arrived at 4) ZBo/ton, the chief Town in the Maffachu- a8] /ects, a Colony of Engli/hmen in New- fae) Leland, the 28¢h of Fuly following. Bofton (whofe longitude is 315 deg. and 42 deg. 30 min. of North Latitude) is built on the South-weft fide of a Bay large enough for the Anchorage of 500 Sail of Ships, the Buildings are handfome, joyning one to the other as in Loxdon, with many large ftreets, moft of them paved with pebble ftone, in the high ftreet towards the Common, there are fair buildings, fome of ftone, and at the Eaft End of the [2] Town one amongft the reft, built by the Shore by Mr. Gis, a Merchant, being a ftately Edifice, which it is thought will ftand him in little lefs E 34 HNew-Englands Waritics. than 3000 Z before it be fully finifhed.t The Town is not divided into Parifhes, yet they have three fair Meeting- houfes or Churches, which hardly fuffice to receive the Inhabitants and Strangers that come in from all parts. Having refrefhed my felf here for fome time, and oppor- tunely lighting upon a paflage in a Bark belonging to a Friend of my Brothers, and bound to the Eaftward, I put to sea again, and on the Fifteenth of Augu/z, I arrived at Black-point, otherwife called Scarborow, the habitation of my beloved Brother,’ being about an hundred leagues to the * 1 This house was one Mr. Robert Gibbs’s ‘‘of an ancient family in Devon- shire,” says Farmer (Geneal. Reg., p. 120); and it stood on Fort Hill, the way leading to it becoming afterwards known as Gibbs’s Lane, and a wharf at the waterside, belonging to the property, as Gibbs’s Wharf. Mr. W. B. Trask, who obligingly examined for me the early deeds concerning this estate in Suffolk Registry, furnishes a memorandum, that on the 6th June, 1671, Robert Gibbs of Boston, merchant, conveys to Edward and Elisha Hutchinson, in trust, for Eliza- beth, wife of said Robert, during her life, and after her decease to such child or _ children as he shall have by her, his land and house on Fort Hill, with warehouse on wharf, ‘which land was formerly my grandfather, Henry Webb’s.’ The wife of said Robert Gibbs was daughter to Jacob Sheafe by Margaret, daughter to Henry Webb, mercer. Sampson Sheafe, a Provincial councillor of New Hampshire, and the ancestor of a family of long standing there, married another daughter of Jacob Sheafe. Mr. Gibbs was father to the Rev. Henry Gibbs, minister of Water- town, and had other children; and the family continues to this day. 2 Compare the author’s Voyages, pp. 19, 161, 173, for other notices of Boston, and as to the first of these, which represents the town (in 1638) as ‘‘rather a village, . . . there being not above twenty or thirty houses,” see the note in Savage’s Winthrop, edit. 1, vol. i. p. 267. ® Mr. Henry Josselyn was probably living at Black Point in 1638, when his brother first visited it (Voyages, p. 20). It was then the estate (by grant from the council at Plymouth) and residence of Captain Thomas Cammock; but he, dying in 1643, bequeathed it, except five hundred acres which were reserved to his wife, to Josselyn, who, marrying the widow, succeeded to the whole property, which was described as containing fifteen hundred acres (Willis zz/ra), but is called by Sullivan five thousand (History of Maine, p. 128). In 1658, this and other adjoining tracts were erected into a town by Massachusetts, under the name New-Englands Rarities. 35 Eaftward of Boffox; here I refided eight years, and made it -my bufinefs to difcover all along the Natural, Phyfical, and Chyrurgical Rarities of this New-found World. New-England is faid to begin at 40 and to end at 46 of Northerly Latitude, that is from de la Ware Bay to New- found-Land. The Sea Coafts are accounted Seek the Eaft and South Winds coming [3] from Sea produceth warm weath- er, the Northweft coming over land caufeth extremity of Cold, and many times ftrikes the Inhabitants both Exgl/h and /zdzan with that fad Diseafe called there the Plague of the back, but with us Zmpzema.’ The Country generally is Rocky and Mountanous, and extremely overgrown with wood, yet here and there beau- tified with large rich Valleys, wherein are Lakes ten, twenty, yea fixty miles in compafs, out of which our great Rivers have their Beginnings.” Fourfcore miles (upon a direct line) to the Northweft of Scarborow, a Ridge of Mountains run Northweft and of Scarborough, which is thus further noticed by our author in his Voyages, p. 201, as “‘ the town of Black Point, consisting of about fifty dwelling-houses, and a Magazine, or Doganne, scatteringly built. They have store of neat and horses, of sheep near upon seven or eight hundred, much arable and marsh, salt and fresh, and a corn-mill.”— Comp. Williamson’s Hist. of Maine, vol. i. pp. 392, 666; Willis in Geneal. Register, vol. i. p. 202. 1 Empyema is a result of disease of the lungs. See Voyages, p. 121. 2 Compare the accounts of the first appearance of the country by the Rey. Francis Higginson and Mr Thomas Graves, both well-qualified observers, in New- England’s Plantation, London, 1630; reprinted in Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. i. p. 117. And see Wood’s New England’s Prospect, a book which our author was probably acquainted with; as compare p. 4 of Wood (edit. 1764) with the beginning of p. 3 of the Rarities, and some other places in both. 36 New-Englands Rarities. Northeaft an hundred Leagues, known by the name of the White Mountains, upon which lieth Snow all the year, and is a Land-mark twenty miles off at Sea. It is rifing ground from the Sea fhore to thefe Hills, and they are inacceflible but by the Gullies which the diffolved Snow hath made; in thefe Gullies grow Savex Bufhes, which being taken hold of are a good help to the climbing Dif- coverer; upon the top of the higheft of thefe Mountains is a large Level [4] or Plain of a days journey over, whereon nothing grows but Moss; at the farther end of this Plain is another Hill called the Sugar-Loaf, to out- ward appearance a rude heap of maffie ftones piled one upon another, and you may as you afcend ftep from one ftone to another, as if you were going up a pair of ftairs, but winding ftill about the Hill till you come to the top, which will require half a days time, and yet it is not above a Mile, where there is alfo a Level of about an Acre of ground, with a pond of clear water in the midft of it; which you may hear run down, but how it afcends is a myftery. From this rocky Hill you may fee the whole Country round about; it is far above the lower Clouds, and from hence we beheld a Vapour (like a great Pillar) drawn up by the Sun Beams out of a great Lake or Pond into the Air, where it was formed into a Cloud. The Country beyond thefe Hills Northward is daunting terri- ble, being full of rocky Hills, as thick as Mole-hills in a Meadow, and cloathed with infinite thick Woods.! 1 The earliest ascents of the White Mountains were those made by Field and others in 1642, of which we have some account in Winthrop’s Journal (by Savage, New-Englands Warities. BY New-England is by fome affirmed to be an Ifland, bounded on the North with the [5] River Cazada, (fo edit. 1, vol. ii. pp. 67, 89). Darby Field, ‘‘an Irishman living about Pascata- quack,” has the honor of being the first European who set foot upon the summit of Mount Washington. He appears at Exeter in 1639, and was at Dover in 1645, and died there in 1649, leaving a widow, and, it is said, children (A. H. Quint, N. E. Geneal. Reg., vol. vi. p. 38). It seems likely, from his account, that Field, on reaching the Indian town in the Saco Valley, ‘‘at the foot of the hill” where the ‘two branches of Saco river met,” pursued his way up the valley either of Rocky Branch or of Ellis River, till he gradually attained to the region of dwarf firs, on what is known as Boott’s Spur, which is between the “valley” called Oakes’s Gulf, in which the ‘“* Mount Washington” branch of the Saco has its head, and the valley in which the Rocky Branch rises (see G. P. Bond’s Map of the White Mountains). There is no other way that shall fulfil the conditions of the narrative except that over Boott’s Spur; but of the three streams, that is, “the two branches of Saco River,” which come together at or near the probable site of the Indian town, the Rocky Branch is the shortest, and its valley the most ascending. Field repeated his visit, with some others, ‘‘about a month after; ” and later, in the same year, the mountains were visited by the worshipful Thomas Gorges, Esq., Deputy-Governor, and Richard Vines, Esq., Councillor of the Pro- vince of Maine, of which Winthrop takes notice at p. 89. Whether Josselyn went up himself, or had his account from others, does not appear. But his call- ing the mountains ‘‘ inaccessible but by the gullies,” leaves it at least supposable, that he, or the party from which he got his information (perhaps Gorges’s), instead of gradually ascending the long ridges, or spurs, penetrated into one of the gulfs (as they are there called), or ravines, of the eastern side; the walls of which are exceedingly steep, and literally inaccessible in many parts, except by the gullies. The ‘‘large level or plain of a day’s journey over, whereon grows nothing but moss,” is noticed in Winthrop’s account of Gorges’s ascent, but not in that of Field’s; and this plain — which doubtless includes what has since been called ** Bigelow’s Lawn” (lying immediately under the south-eastern side of the summit of Mount Washington), but understood also, in Gorges’s account, to ex- tend northward as far as the ‘“‘ Lake of the Clouds ”— furnishes another ground for supposing that the last-mentioned explorer, or, at least, Josselyn, may have penetrated the mountain by one of its eastern ravines; several of which head in the great plain mentioned, while that is rather remote from what we have taken for Field’s ‘‘ridge.” Our author is the only authority for the ‘‘ pond of clear water in the midst of” the top of Mount Washington; though a somewhat capa- cious spring, which was well known there before the putting-up of the house on the summit, may have been larger once; or he may rather have mistaken, or misremembered, the position of the Lake of the Clouds. 38 New-Englands Barities. called from Monfieur Caze) on the South with the River Mohegan, or ffudfons River, fo called becaufe he was the firft that difcovered it." Some will have America to be an Ifland, which out of queftion muft needs be, if there be a Northeatt paffage found out into the South Sea; it con- tains 1152400000 Acres. ‘The difcovery of the North- weit paflage (which lies within the River of Caxada) was undertaken with the help of fome Proteftant -renchmen, which left Cazada and retired to Boffon about the year 1669. The Northeaft people of America i.e. New England, Gc. are judged to be Zartars called Samoades, being alike in complexion, fhape, habit and manners, (fee the G/ode:) Their Language is very fignificant, ufing but few words, every word having a diverfe fignification, which is expreft by their gefture; as when they hold their head of one fide the word fignifieth one thing, holding their hand up when they pronounce it fignifieth another thing. Their Speech- es in their Affemblies are very gravely delivered, com- monly in perfect Hexamiter Verte, with great filence and attention, and anfwered again ex ¢empore after the fame manner.” [6] Having given you fome fhort Notes concerning the Country in general, I fhall now enter upon the propofed Difcovery of the Natural, Phyfical, and Chyrurgical Rari- ties; and that I may methodically deliver them unto you, 1 Compare, as to the insulation of the tract understood by Josselyn as New England, Palfrey, Hist. N. E., vol. i. pp. 1, 2, and note, and the accompanying map. 2 See the author’s larger account of the natives in his Voyages, pp. 123-150. Neww-Englands Rarities. 39 I fhall caft them into this form: 1. Birds. 2. Beafts. 3. Fifhes. 4. Serpents and Infeéts. 5. Plants, of thefe, 1. fuch Plants as are common with us, 2. of fuch Plants as are proper to the country, 3. of fuch Plants as are proper to the Country and have no name known to us, 4. of fuch Plants as have fprung up fince the Exg/h Planted and kept Cattle there; 5. of fuch Garden Herbs (amongft us) as do thrive there and of fuch as donot. 6. Of Stones, Minerals, Metals, and Earths. Firft, Of Birds.’ The Humming Bird. He Humming Bird, the leatt of all Birds, little bigger than a Dor, of variable glittering Colours, they feed upon Honey, which they fuck out of Bloffoms [7] and Flowers with their long Needle-like Bills; they fleep all Winter, and are not to be feen till the Spring, at which time they breed in little Nefts, made up like a bottom of foft, Silk-like matter, their Eggs no bigger than a white Peafe, they hatch three or four at a time, and are proper to this Country. 1 There is a much fuller account —to be noticed again — of our birds, in the Voyages, pp. 95-103. Wood’s (N. E. Prospect, chap. viii.) is also curious. In the notes which immediately follow, on the birds, beasts, fishes, and reptiles, the oldest writers on our natural history will be found often to explain or illustrate each other. ce . 40 New-Englands Barities. The Troculus The Zvoculus, a {mall Bird, black and white, no bigger than a Swallow, the points of whofe Feathers are fharp, which they ftick into the fides of the Chymney (to reft themfelves, their Legs being exceeding fhort) where they breed in Nefts made like a Swallows Neft, but of a glewy fubftance, and which is not faftened to the Chymney as a Swallows Neft, but hangs down the Chymney by a clew- like ftring a yard long. ‘They commonly have four or five young ones, and when they go away, which is much about the time that Swallows ufe to depart, they never fail to throw down one of their young Birds into the room by way of Gratitude. I have more than once obferved, that againft the ruin of the. Family thefe Birds will fuddenly forfake the houfe and come no more. [8] Zhe Prlhannaw? The Pilhannaw or Mechguan, much like the defcrip- tion of the Zzdzan Ruck, a monftrous great Bird, a kind 1 Chimney-swallow. 2 «The pilhannaw is the king of birds of prey in New England. Some take him to be a kind of eagle; others for the Indian ruck, — the biggest bird that is, except the ostrich. One Mr. Hilton, living at Pascataway, had the hap to kill one of them. Being by the sea-side, he perceived a great shadow over his head, the sun shining out clear. Casting up his eyes, he saw a monstrous bird soaring aloft in the air; and, of a sudden, all the ducks and geese (there being then a great many) dived under water, nothing of them appearing but their heads. Mr. Hilton, having made readie his piece, shot and brought her down to the ground. How he disposed of her, I know not; but had he taken her alive, and sent her over into England, neither Bartholomew nor Sturbridge Fair could have produced such another sight.” — Yosselyn’s Voyages, p. 95. These notices have been taken Aew-Englands Rarities. 41 of Hawk, fome fay an Eagle, four times as big as a Gof- hawk, white Mail’d, having two or three purple Feathers in her head as long as Geefes Feathers. they make Pens of the Quills of thefe Feathers are purple, as big as Swans Quills and tranfparent; her Head is as big as a Childs of a year old, a very Princely Bird; when fhe foars abroad, all fort of feathered Creatures hide them- felves, yet fhe never preys upon any of them, but upon Fawus and Faccals: She Ayries in the Woods upon the high Hills of Ofapy, and is very rarely or feldome feen. The Turkies The Zurkze, who is blacker than ours; I have heard feveral credible perfons affirm, they have feen Turkhze to be sufficient by some writers to show the probable existence of ‘‘a bird of prey, very large and bold, on the back of some of our American plantations.” But our author’s account indicates clearly a crested eagle, which we cannot explain by any thing nearer home than the yzquautli, or crested vulture of Mexico and the countries south of it (Falco Harpyja, Gmel.); two notices of which (cited by Linnzus) had been published some twenty years before Josselyn wrote, and may have been supposed by him to be applicable to a large bird which he had heard of as inhabiting mountains about Ossipee. The great heron—an inhabitant of the coast, and so uncommon inland that “‘one . . . shot in the upper parts of New Hampshire was described to” Wilson ‘‘as a great curiosity” (Amer. Ornith., by Brewer, p. 555) — has the size and the crest of Josselyn’s bird; and, if this last was only (as is possible) the name of a confused conception made up from several accounts of large birds, the heron may well be thought to have had a share in it. 1 “Of these, sometimes there will be forty, threescore and a hundred, of a flock; sometimes more, and sometimes less. Their feeding is acorns, hawes, and berries: some of them get a haunt to frequent English corn. In winter, when the snow covers the ground, they resort to the seashore to look for shrimps, and such small fishes, at low tides. Such as love turkey-hunting must follow it in winter, after a new-fallen snow, when he may follow them by their tracks. Some have killed ten or a dozen in half a day. If they can be found towards an F 42 New-Englands Rarities. Cocks that have weighed forty, yea fixty pound; but out of my perfonal experimental knowledge I can affure you, that I have eaten my fhare of a Turkze Cock, that when he was pull’d and garbidg’d, weighed thirty [9] pound; and I have alfo feen threefcore broods of young 7urkzes on the fide of a marfh, sunning of themfelves in a morning betimes, but this was thirty years fince, the Engh/h and the Zndzans having now deftroyed the breed, fo that ’tis very rare to meet with a wild Zurkze in the Woods; But fome of the Exef/h bring up great ftore of the wild kind, which remain about their Houfes as tame as ours in England. The Goofes The Goo/e, of which there are three kinds; the Gray Goofe, the White Goofe, and the Brant: The Goofe will evening, and watched where they perch, — if one come about ten or eleven of the clock, — he may shoot as often as he will: they will sit, unless they be slenderly wounded. These turkies remain all the year long. The price of a good turkey- cock is four shillings; and he is well worth it, for he may be in weight forty pounds; a hen, two shillings.”— Wood, N. Eng. Prosped, chap. viii. See also Josselyn’s Voyages, p. 99. 1 «The geese of the country be of three sorts. First, a brant goose; which is a goose almost like the wild goose in England. The price of one of these is six- pence. The second kind is a white goose, almost as big as an English tame goose. These come in great flocks about Michaelmas: sometimes there will be two or three thousand in a flock. Those continue six weeks, and so fly to the southward; returning in March, and staying six weeks more, returning to the northward. The price of one of these is eightpence. The third kind of geese is a great grey goose, with a black neck, and a black and white head; strong of flight: and these be a great deal bigger than the ordinary geese of England; some very fat, and, in the spring, full of feathers, that the shot can scarce pierce them. Most of these geese remain with us from Michaelmas to April. They feed in the sea upon grass in the bays at low water, and gravel, and Hew-Englands Rarities. 43 live a long time; I once found in a White Goofe three Hearts, fhe was a very old one, and fo tuff, that we gladly gave her over although exceeding well roafted. The Bloody-Flux Cured. A Friend of mine of good Quality living fometime in Virginia was fore troubled for a long time with the Bloody-F lux, having tryed feveral Remedies by the advice of his Friends without any good effeét, at laft was in- duced with a longing defire to drink the Fat Dripping [10] of a Goofe newly taken from the Fire, which abfo- lutely cured him, who was in defpair of ever recovering his health again. The Gripe and Vulture. The Grzfe, which is of two kinds, the one with a White Head, the other with a black Head, this we take for the Vulture. They are both cowardly X7z¢es,’ preying upon in the woods of acorns; having, as other fowl have, their pass and repass to the northward and southward. The accurate marksmen kill of these both flying and sitting. The price of a grey goose is eighteen-pence.” — Wood, NV. E. Prospect, Z.c. The white goose here mentioned is probably the snow-goose; upon which compare Nuttall, Mass. Ornith., Water-Birds, p. 344. Josselyn (Voyages, p. 100) says the brant and the gray goose “‘are best meat; the white are lean and tough, and live a long time; whereupon the proverb, ‘Older than a white goose:’” which is not supported by Wood or later writers. The snow-goose has become much less frequent with us since the settlement of the country. The great grey goose of Wood is our well-known Canada goose. 1 This was the best that our author could say of the eagles of New England. Wood assists us once more here: “‘ The eagles of the country be of two sorts, — one like the eagles that be in England; the other is something bigger, with a great white head and white tail. These be commonly called gripes.” — New-Eug. 44 New-Englands Rarities. Fifh caft up on the fhore. In the year 1668. there was a great mortality of Eels in Cafco Bay, thither reforted at the fame time an infinite number of Grzfes, infomuch that being fhot by the Inhabitants, they fed their Hogs with them for fome weeks; at other times you fhall fel- dom fee above two or three in a dozen miles travelling. The Quzll Feathers in their Wings make excellent Jext Pens, and the Feathers of their Tail are highly efteemed by the Zzdzans for their Arrows, they will not fing in flying; a Grzpes Tail is worth a Beavers Skin, up in the Country. Prosped,1l.c. The first spoken of by Wood—and perhaps, also, what Josselyn names last— may be the common or ring-tailed eagle, now known to be the young of the golden eagle. The second of Wood, and first of our author, is without doubt, the bald eagle; the (so to say) tyrannical habits of which bird are sufficiently well known, at least in the vivid pages of Wilson. See the Voyages, p. 96; where we learn also that ‘“‘ hawkes there are of several kinds; as goshawks, falcons, laniers, sparrow-hawkes, and a little black hawke highly prized by the Indians, who wear them on their heads, and is accounted of worth sufficient to ransom a sagamour. They are so strangely couragious and hardie that nothing flyeth in the air that they will not bind with. I have seen them tower so high, that they have been so small that scarcely could they be taken by the eye” (p. 95-6). Wood makes_like mention of this little black hawk (New- Eng. Prospeét, 7. c.); and R. Williams (Key into the Language of the Indians of N. E., in Hist. Coll., vol. iii. p. 220) calls it ‘‘ sachim, a little bird about the big- ness of a swallow, or less; to which the Indians give that name, because of its sachem or prince-like courage and command over greater birds: that a man shall often see this small bird pursue and vanquish and put to flight the crow and other birds far bigger than itself.” This was our well-known king-bird; and Josselyn, on the same page, tells us of ‘‘a small ash-colour bird that is shaped like a hawke, with talons and beak, that falleth upon _crowes; mounting up into the air after them, and will beat them till they make them cry:” which was, per- haps, the king-bird’s half-cousin, as Wilson calls him, — the purple-martin. New-Englands Rarities. 45 A Remedy for the Coldnefs and pain of the Stomach. The Skin of a Grzfe dreft with the doun on, is good to wear upon the Stomach for the Pain and Coldnefs of it. [11] Zhe Ofprey. The O/rey, which in this Country is white mail’d. A Remedy for the Tooth-ach. Their Beaks excell for the Tooth-ach, picking the Gums therewith till they bleed. The Wobbles The Wodéé, an ill fhaped Fowl, having no long Feath- ers in their Pinions, which is the reafon they cannot fly, not much unlike the Pexgwim; they are in the Spring very fat, or rather oyly, but pull’d and garbidg’d, and laid to the Fire to roaft, they yield not one drop. For Aches. Our way (for they are very foveraign for Aches) is to make Mummy of them, that is, to falt them well, and dry them in an earthern pot well glazed in an Oven; or elfe (which is the better way) to burn them under ground for a day or two, then quarter them and ftew them in a Tin Stewpan with a very little water. 1 Nuttall (Manual, Water-Birds, p. 520) says that the young of the red- throated diver is called cobble in England. Our author elsewhere (Voyages, p. 101) makes mention of the ‘‘ wobble” and the ‘‘ wilmote” (that is, guillemot) as distin&t; but 42s wilmot was “‘ a kind of teal.” 46 New-Englands Warities. [12] Zhe Loone. The Loone is a Water Fowl, alike in fhape to the Wod- éle, and as virtual for Aches, which we order after the fame manner.! The Owl. The Owl, Avis devia, which are of three kinds; the great Gray Owl with Ears, the little Gray Ow/d, and the White Owl which is no bigger than a Thrufh2 The Turkie Buzzard. The Zurkie Buzzard, a kind of Azte, but as big as a Turkie, brown of colour, and very good meat.’ What Birds are not to be found in New-England. Now, by what the country hath not, you may chefs at what it hath; it hath no Wzghd¢zngals, nor Larks, nor Bul- jinches, nor Sparrows, nor Blackbirds, nor Mag|12|pres, 1 “He maketh a noise sometimes like a sow-gelder’s horn.” — WV. Eng. Prospect, 1. c. 2 The first is the great-horned or cat-owl; the second, probably, the mottled or little screech-owl, which Wood notices more fully as ‘‘small, speckled like a partridge, with ears” (2. c.); and the third, the Acadian or little owl. There are but two owls reckoned in New-England’s Prospect; the second of which—‘‘a great owl, almost as big as an eagle;. his body being as good meat as a partridge” (2. c.) —is, perhaps, the snowy owl, which, according to Audubon, is good eat- ing. — Peabody Report on Birds of Mass., p. 275. 3 Tt is not clear what is meant here. The author merely mentions the bird again, in Voyages, p. 96. Pew-Englands Barities. ~ 44 nor Fackdawes, nor Popinjays, nor Rooks, nor Pheafants, nor Woodcocks, nor Quazls, nor Robins, nor Cuckoes#&c." 1 So Wood: “ There are no magpies, jackdaws, cuckoos, jays, &c.” — New- England’s Prosped, 1. c. Gur author, in his Voyages, adds to the above list of New-England birds the following: ‘‘The partridge is larger than ours}. white- flesht, but very dry: they are indeed a sort of partridges called grooses. The pidgeon, of which there are millions of millions. . . . The snow-bird, like a chaf- finch, go in flocks, and are good meat. . . . Thrushes, with red breasts, which will be very fat, and are good meat. . . . Thressels, . . . filladies, .. . . small singing-birds; ninmurders, little yellow birds; New-England nightingales, paint- ed with orient colours, — black, white, blew, yellow, green, and scarlet, — and sing sweetly; wood-larks, wrens, swallows, who will sit upon trees; and starlings, black as ravens, with scarlet pinions. Other sorts of birds there are; as the tro- culus, wagtail or dish-water, which is here of a brown colour; titmouse, — two or three sorts; the dunneck or hedge-sparrow, who is starke naked in his winter nest; the golden or yellow hammer, —a bird about the bigness of a thrush, that is all over as red as bloud; woodpeckers of two or three sorts, gloriously set out with variety of glittering colours; the colibry, viemalin, or rising or walking- bird, — an emblem of the resurrection, and the wonder of little birds. The water- fowl are these that follow: Hookers, or wild swans; cranes; ... four sorts of ducks, —a black duck, a brown duck like our wild ducks, a grey duck, and a great black and white duck. These frequent rivers and ponds. But, of ducks, there be many more sorts; as hounds, old wives, murres, doies, shell-drakes, shoulers or shoflers, widgeons, simps, teal, blew-wing’d and green-wing’d didapers or dipehicks, fenduck, duckers or moorhens, coots, pochards (a water-fowl like a duck), plungeons (a kind of water-fowl, with a long, reddish bill), puets, plovers, smethes, wilmotes (a kind of teal), godwits, humilities, knotes, red-shankes, .. . gulls, white gulls or sea-cobbs, caudemandies, herons, grey bitterns, ox-eyes, birds called oxen and keen, petterels, king’s fishers, . . . little birds that frequent the sea-shore in flocks, called sanderlins. They are about the bigness of a sparrow, and, in the fall of the leaf, will be all fat. When I was first in the countrie” (that is, in 1638; in which connection, what follows is not without its interest to us), “the English cut them into small pieces to put into their puddings, instead of suet. I have known twelve-score and above killed at two shots. . . . The cormo- rant, shape or sharke” (pp. 99-103). a * 48 * Petw- Englands Rarities. Secondly, Of Beatts.’ The Bear, which are generally Black. He Bear, they live four months in Caves, that is all Winter; in the Spring they bring forth their young ones, they feldome have above three Cubbs in a litter, are very fat in the Fall of the Leaf with feeding upon Acorns, at which time they are excellent Venifon; their Brains are venomous; They feed much upon water Plantane in the Spring and Summer, and Berries, and alfo upon a fhell-fith called a Hor/e-foot; and are never mankind, i.e. fierce, but in rutting time, and then they walk the Country twenty, thirty, forty in a company, making a hideous noife with roaring, which you may hear a mile or two before they come fo near to endanger the Traveller. About four years fince, Acorns being very fearce up in the Country, fome numbers of them came down [14] amongft the Englih Plantations, which generally are by the Sea fide; 1 Compare the account given in the Voyages, pp. 82-95, which is much fuller; as also New-England’s Prospe¢t, chap. vi. 2 “Most fierce in strawberry-time; at which time they have young ones; at which time, likewise, they will go upright, like a man, and climb trees, and swim to the islands: which if the Indians see, there will be more sportful bear-baiting than Paris garden can afford; for, seeing the bears take water, an Indian will leap after him; where they go to water-cuffs for bloody noses and scratched sides. In the end, the man gets the victory; riding the bear over the watery plain, till he can bear him no longer. . . . There would be more of them, if it were not for the wolves which devour them. A kennel of those ravening runagadoes, setting upon a poor, single bear, will tear him as a dog will tear a kid.” — Vew-Eug. Prosped, 1. c., which see farther; and also Josselyn’s Voyages, pp. 91-2. New-Englands Rarities. 49 at one Town called Gorgzana in the Province of Meyx (called alfo Mew-Sommer/et/hire) they kill’d fourfcore. for Aches and Cold Swellings. Their Greafe is very good for Aches and Cold Swel- lings, the Zvdians anoint themfelves therewith from top to toe, which hardens them againft the cold weather. A black Bears Skin heretofore was worth forty {hillings, now you may have one for ten, much ufed by the Exgli/h for Beds and Coverlets, and by the Zzdzans for Coats. for Pain and Lamene/s upon Cold. One Edw. Andrews being foxt,’ and falling backward crofs a Thought? in a Shallop or Fifher-boat, and taking cold upon it, grew crooked, lame, and full of pain, was cured, lying one Winter upon Bears Skins newly flead off, with fome upon him, fo that he fweat every night. The Wolf? The Wolf, of which there are two kinds; one with a round-ball’d Foot, and [15] are in fhape like mungrel 1 Stupefied with drink. — Webster, Eng. Did. 2 Thwart. 3 «The woolves be in some respect different from them in other countries. It was never known yet that a wolf ever set upon a man or woman: neither do they trouble horses or cows; but swine, goats, and red calves, which they take for deer, be often destroyed by them; so that a red calf is cheaper than a black one, in that regard, in some places. . . . They be made much like a mungrel; being big-boned, lank-paunched, deep-breasted; having a thick neck and head, prick ears and long snout, with dangerous teeth; long, staring hair, and a great bush- tail. It is thought by many that our English mastiff might be too hard for them: G 50 Pew-Englands Rarities. Mafttiffs; the other with a flat Foot, thefe are liker Grey- hounds, and are called Deer Wolfs, because they are accuftomed to prey upon Deer. A Wolf will eat a Wolf new dead, and fo do Bears as I fuppofe, for their dead Carkafes are never found, neither by the /zdzan nor Englijh. They goa clicketing twelve days, and have as many Whelps at a Litter as a Bitch. The /vdian Dog’ is a Creature begotten ’twixt a Wolf and a Fox, which the /ndians lighting upon, bring up to hunt the Deer with. The Wolf is very numerous, and go in companies, fome- times ten, twenty, more or fewer, and fo cunning, that feldome any are kill’d with Guns or Traps; but of late they have invented a way to deftroy them, by binding four - Maycril Hooks a cro{s with a brown thread, and then wrapping fome Wool about them, they dip them in melted Tallow till it be as round and as big as an Egg; thefe (when any Beaft hath been kill’d by the Wolves) they featter by the dead Carkafe, after they have beaten off the Wolves; about Midnight the Wolves are fure to return again to the place where they left the flaughtered Beatt, and the (16) firft thing they venture upon will be thefe balls of fat. but it is no such matter; for they care no more for an ordinary mastiff than an ordinary mastiff cares for a cur. Many good dogs have been spoiled by them. . . . There is little hope of their utter destruction; the country being so spacious, and they so numerous, travelling in the swamps by kennels: sometimes ten or twelve are of a company. . . . In a word, they be the greatest inconven- iency the country hath.” — New-England’s Prospect, 1. c. 1 Spoken of again in the Voyages, pp. 94 and 193; and in Hubbard, Hist. N. England, p. 25. Josselyn’s may be compared with Lewis and Clark’s notice of the Indian dog (Travels, vol. ii. p. 165). Pew-Englands Rarities. 51 for old Aches. A black Wolfs Skin is worth a Leaver Skin among the Indians, being highly efteemed for helping old Aches in old people, worn as a Coat; they are not mankind, as in [reland and other Countries, but do much harm by deftroying of our Exglj/h Cattle. The Ounce The Ounce or Wild Cat, is about the bignefs of two lufty Ram Cats, preys upon Deer and our Enxgl/hi Poul- trey: I once found fix whole Ducks in the belly of one I killed by a Pond fide: Their flefh roafted is as good as Lamb, and as white. for Aches and fhrunk Sinews. Their Greafe is foveraign for all manner of Aches and fhrunk Sinews: Their Skins are accounted good Fur, but fomewhat courfe. 1 Called also ‘‘lusern, or luceret,” in the Voyages, p. 85; the loup-cervier of Sagard (Hist. Can., 1636, czt. Aud. and Bachm. Vivip. Quad. N. A., p. 136); of Dobbs’s Hudson’s Bay, &c.; but more commonly called gray cat, or lynx, in New.England. Wood calls it ‘‘ more dangerous to be met withal than any other creature; not fearing either dog or man. He useth to kill deer. . . . He hath likewise a device to get geese: for, being much of the colour of a goose, he will place himself close by the water; holding up his bob-tail, which is like a goose- neck. The geese, seeing this counterfeit goose, approach nigh to visit him; who, with a sudden jerk, apprehends his mistrustless prey. The English kill many of these, accounting them very good meat.” — New-Eng. Prosped, l.c. Audubon and Bachman (/. c., p. 14) give a similar good account of the flesh of the bay- lynx, or common wild-cat. 52 ANew-Englands Rarities. [17] Zhe Raccoon." The Raccoon liveth in hollow trees, and is about the fize of a G7zb Cat; they feed upon Mafs, and do infeft our /zdian Corn very much; they will be exceeding fat in Autumn; their flefh is fomewhat dark, but good food roatted. for Brutfes and Aches. Their Fat is excellent for bruifes and Aches. Their Skins are efteemed a good deep Fur; but yet as the Wild Cats fomewhat coarfe. The Porcupine. The Porcupine, in fome parts of the Countrey Eaftward towards the /vench, are as big as an ordinary Mungrel Cur; a very angry Creature, and dangerous, fhooting a whole fhower of Quills with a rowfe at their enemies, which are of that nature, that wherever they ftick in the flefh, they will work through in a fhort time, if not pre- vented by pulling of them out. The /zdzans make ufe of their Quills, which are hardly a handful long, to adorn [18] the edges of their birchen difhes, and weave (dying 1 The raccoon is, or has been, an inhabitant of all North America (Godman, Nat. Hist., vol. i. p. 117), and was one of the first of our animals with which Euro- pean naturalists became acquainted. Linnzus (Syst. Nat.) cites Conrad Gesner among those who have illustrated or mentioned it. Wood says they are “as good meat as a lamb;” and further, that, ‘‘in the moonshine night, they go to feed on clams at a low tide, by the seaside, where the English hunt them with their dogs.” — New-Eng. Prospect, l. c. Arciu-Englands Maritics. 53 fome of them red, others yellow and blew) curious bags or pouches, in works like Zurkze-work.’ The Beaver, Canis Ponticus, Amphybious? The Beaver, whofe old ones are as big as an Ofter, or rather bigger, a Creature of a rare inftinét, as may appar- ently be feen in their artificial Dam-heads to raife the water in the Ponds where they keep, and their houfes having three ftories, which would be too large to dif- courfe.”, They have all of them four Cods hanging out- wardly between their hinder legs, two of them are foft or oyly, and two folid or hard; the /zdzans fay they are Flermaphrodites. For Wind in the Stomach. Their folid Cods are much ufed in Phyfick: Our Exglij/h- women in this Country ufe the powder grated, as much as will lye upon a fhilling in a draught of F7o/ Wine, for Wind in the Stomach and Belly, and venture many times in fuch cafes to give it to Women with Child: Their Tails are flat, and covered with Scales without hair, [19] which being flead off, and the Tail boiled, proves exceed- ing good meat, being all Fat, and as fweet as Marrow. 1 The author’s account of the Indian works in birch-bark and porcupine-quills is much fuller in his Voyages, p. 143. 2 Wood’s account is far better. — Mew-Eng. Prosped, chap. vii. See page 53 of the Rarities for mention of the musk quash. 54 New-Englands Marities. The Moofe-Deer. The Moofe Deer, which is a very goodly Creature, fome of them twelve foot high, with exceeding fair Horns with broad Palms, fome of them two fathom from the tip of one Horn to the other; they commonly have three fawns at a time, their flefh is not dry like Deers flefh, but moift and lufhious fomewhat like Horfe flefh (as they judge that have tafted of both) but very wholfome. The flefh of their /awzs is an incomparable difh, beyond the flefh of an Affes Foal fo highly efteemed by the Romans, or that of young Spaniel Puppies fo much cried up in our days in France and Exgland. Moofe Florns better for Phy fick Ufe than Harts Horns. Their Horns are far better (in my opinion) for Phyfick than the Horris of other Deer, as being of a ftronger nature: As for their Claws, which both Exgli/hmen and French make ufe of for Z7k, I cannot [20] approve fo to be from the Effects, having had fome trial of it; befides, 1 See Voyages, pp. 88-91. Called moos-soog (rendered ‘‘ great-ox; or, rather, red deer”) in R. Williams’s Key (Hist. Coll., vol. iii. p. 223): but this is rather the plural form of moos; as see the same, /. c. p. 222, and note, and Rasles’ Di&. Abnaki, zz Joco. It is called mongsda by the Cree Indians; and, it should seem, #ongsoos by the Indians of the neighborhood of Carlton House; as see Richardson, in Sabine’s Appendix to Franklin’s Narrative of a Journey to the Polar Sea, pp. 665-6. ‘The English,” says Wood, “have some thoughts of keeping him tame, and to accustome him to the yoke; which will be a great commodity. . . . There be not many of these in the Massachusetts Bay; but, forty miles to the north-east, there be great store of them.” — New-Eng. Pros- ped, 1. c. On hunting the moose, as practised by the Indians, see’ Josselyn’s Voyages, p. 136. New-Englands iMarities. 55 all that write of the Z7é defcribe him with a tuft of hair on the left Leg behind, a little above the paftern joynt on the outfide of the Leg, not unlike the tuft (as I conceive) that groweth upon the breaft of a Zurkze Cock, which I could never yet fee upon the Leg of a HOY ne and I have feen fome number of them. for Children breeding Teeth. The Zudian Webbes make ufe of the broad Teeth of the Fawns to hang about their Childrens Neck when they are breeding of their Teeth. The Tongue of a grown Moo/e, dried in the fmoak after the /zdzan manner, is a difh for a Sagamor. The Maccarib The Maccarib, Caribo, or Pohano, a kind of Deer, as big as a Stag, round hooved, {mooth hair’d and {oft as filk; 1 Wood (N. E. Prospect, Z. c.) has but two kinds of deer: of which the first is the moose; and the second, called ‘‘ ordinary deer,” and, in the vocabulary of Indian words, oftuck (compare attuck or noonatch, deer, —R. Williams, J. c. ; but a¢tey, in the Cree dialect, signifies a small sort of rein-deer, — Richardson, in Appendix to Franklin’s Journey, p. 665; and it is observable that Rasles’ word for chevreuil is norke), is our American fallow-deer. R. Williams also appears to distinguish with clearness but two; which are, perhaps, the same as Wood’s. Josselyn, in this book, passes quite over the common, or fallow-deer: but, making up in the Voyages for the fallings-short of the Rarities, he goes, in the former, quite the other way; reckoning the roe, buck, red deer, rein-deer, elk, maurouse, and maccarzb. What is further said of these animals, where he speaks more at large, makes it appear likely that the second, third, and fourth names, so far as they have any value, belong to a single kind, —the ‘‘ordinary deer” of Wood (whose description possibly helped Josselyn’s), or our fallow-deer; to which the “roe” is also to be referred: and the ‘‘elk” he himself explains as the moose. But, beside these two kinds, Josselyn has the merit of indicating, with some 56 New-Englands Warities. their Horns grow backwards a long their backs to their rumps, and turn again a handful beyond their Nofe, hay- ing another Horn in the middle of their Forehead, about half a yard long, very ftraight, but [2 1| wreathed like an Unicorns Horn, of a brown jettie colour, and very fmooth: The Creature is no where to be found, but upon Cape Sad/e in the French Quarters, and there too very rarely, they being not numerous; fome few of their Skins and their ftreight Horns are (but very fparingly) brought to the Engli/h. The Fox. The Fox, which differeth not much from ours, but are fomewhat lefs; a black “or Skin heretofore was wont to distinétness, one, or possibly two, others, —the maurouse and the maccarib. The maurouse —of which only the Voyages make mention— ‘‘is somewhat like a moose; but his horns are but small, and himself about the size of a stag. These are the deer that the flat-footed wolves hunt after.”— Voyages, p.g1. This is to be compared with the mauroos, rendered ‘‘cerf,” of Rasles’ Dict., 7. c., p. 382; and, in such connection, is hardly referable to other than the carzbou, or rein- * deer, —a well-known inhabitant of the north-eastern parts of New England, and likely, therefore, to have come to the knowledge of our author; while there seems to be no testimony to its ever having occurred in Massachusetts and southward, where Wood and Williams made their observations. The last, or the maccarzb, cartho, or pohano, of Josselyn, is described above; and, in the Voyages (p. gI), he only repeats that it ‘‘is not found, that ever I heard yet, but upon Cape Sable, near to the French plantations.” The ‘‘ round” hoofs of the maccarzb might lead us to take this for the carzhou of Maine; the round track of which differs much from that of the fallow-deer. But the former is more likely to have been the American elk; so rare, it should seem, where it occurred, when our author wrote, and so little known in the New-England settlements, that his fancy, fed by dark- ling hearsay, could deck it with the honors of the ‘‘ unicorn.” 1 “There are two or three kinds of them, —one a great yellow fox; another grey, who will climb up into trees. The black fox is of much esteem.” — Fosse- HNew-Enalands Rarities. sr, be valued at fifty and fixty pound, but now you may have them for twenty fhillings; indeed there is not any in Vew- England that are perfectly black, but filver hair’d, that is fprinkled with grey hairs. The Faccals The Faccal, is a Creature that hunts the Lzozs prey, a fhrew’d fign that there are Zzozs upon the Continent; there are thofe that are yet living in the Countrey, that do con- ftantly affirm, that about fix or feven and thirty years fince an Judian [22] fhot a young Lzon,’ fleeping upon the body lyn’s Voyages, p. 82; where is also an account of the way of hunting foxes in New England. Wood has nothing special, but that some of the foxes ‘‘be black. Their furrs is of much esteem” (2. c.) Williams (7. c.) has ‘‘ mishkguashim, a red fox; pequawus, a gray fox. The Indians say they have black foxes, which the havé often seen, but never could take any of them. They say they are manit- tooes.” Beside the common red fox, or mzshguashim, we have in all these ac- counts — and also in Morell’s Mova Anglia, 1. c., p. 129—mention of a black fox; which may have been the true black or silver fox, or, in part at least, the more common cross-fox (Aud. and Bachm., Viv. Quadr. N. A., p. 45); the pelt of which is also in high esteem. For Williams’s gray fox, see the next note. Josselyn’s climbing gray fox is perhaps the fisher (Mustela Canadensis, Schreb.), notwithstanding the color. According to Audubon (JZ. c., pp. 51, 310, 315), this is called the black fox in New England and the northern counties of New York. I have heard it more often called black cat in New Hampshire. But the true gray fox (Vulpes Virginianus) ‘has, to a certain degree, the power of climbing trees.” Newberry Zoology, Expl. for Pacific Railroad, vi, part 4, p. 40. 1 “A creature much like a fox, but smaller.” — Voyages, p. 83. Probably the gray fox, called Jeguawus by R. Williams (Vulpes Virginianus, Schreb.); which has not the rank smell of the red fox. — Aud. and Bachm., 1. c., p. 168. 2 “They told me of a young lyon (not long before) kill’d at Piscataway by an Indian.” — Voyages, p. 23. Higginson says that lions ‘‘have been seen at Cape Anne.” — New-Eng. Plantation, l. c., p. 119. ‘‘ Some affirm,” says Wood, ‘that they have seen a lion at Cape Anne. . . . Besides, Plimouth men” (that is, men of old Plymouth, it is likely) ‘* have traded for lion-skins in former times. But H 58 New-Englands IRarities. of an Oak blown up by the roots, with an Arrow, not far from Cape Aue, and fold the Skin to the Exgl/h. But to fay fomething of the Yaccal, they are ordinarily lefs than Foxes, of the colour of a gray Rabbet, and do not fcent nothing near fo ftrong as a Fox; some of the Lz- dians will eat of them: Their Greafe is good for all that fox Greafe is good for, but weaker; they are very numer- ous. The Hares The Hare in New- England is no bigger than our Enghjh Rabbets, of the fame colour, but withall having yellow and black ftrokes down the ribs; in Winter they are milk white, and as the Spring approacheth they come to their colour; when the Snow lies upon the ground they are very bitter with feeding upon the bark of Spruce, and the like. sure it is that there be lions on that continent; for the Virginians saw an old lion in their plantation,” &c. — New-Eng. Prosped, 1. c. The animal here spoken of may well have been the puma or cougar, or American lion. 1 **The rabbits be much like ours in England. The hares be some of them white, and a yard long. These two harmless creatures are glad to shelter them- selves from the harmful foxes in hollow trees; having a hole at the entrance no bigger than they can creep in at.”— Wood, New-Eng. Prospect, l. c. Wood rabbit and Josselyn’s hare, so far as the summer coloring goes, appear to be the gray rabbit (Lepus sylvaticus, Aud. and Bachm., Z. c. p. 173); and the white hare of Wood —as also, probably, the hare, ‘‘ milk-white in winter,” of Josselyn —is doubtless the northern hare (Lepus Americanus, Erxl., Aud. and Bachm., /. c., P- 93)- 2 The Voyages mention, beside the quadrupeds above named, also the skunk (ségankoo of Rasles’ Dic., 7. c.); the musquash (so0skooéssoo of Rasles, J. c.), for ANew-Englands Rarities. 59 [23] Thirdly, Of Fifhes.’ Liny and L/adore write there are not above 144 Kinds of Fifhes, but to my knowledge there are nearer 300: I fuppofe America was not known to Pémy and Lfadore. which see also p. 53 of this; otter; marten, ‘‘as ours are in England, but blacker; ” sable, ‘‘ much of the size of a mattrise, perfe& black, but . . . Inever saw but two of them in eight years’ space;” the squirrel, ‘‘three sorts, —the mouse-squirril, the gray squirril, and the flying-squirril (called by the Indian assapanick).” Our author’s mouse-squirrel, which he describes, is the ground or striped squirrel: probably the “‘ azeguus, a little coloured squirrel” of R. Williams, Z. c.; and the antkoosess (rendered suzsse) of Rasles, 7. c. The mattrise of our author is, accord- ing to him, “‘a creature whose head and fore-parts is shaped somewhat like a lyon’s; not altogether so big as a house-cat. They are innumerable up in the countrey, and are esteemed good furr.” — Voyages, p. 87. The sable is compared with the mattrise, at least in size; and the name is perhaps comparable with mattegoo€ssoo of Rasles, 7. c. ; but this is rendered Zevre. Wood adds to this list of our quadrupeds, mistakenly, the ferret; and R. Williams, the “‘ ockguutchaun- nug,—awild beast of a reddish hair, about the bigness of a pig, and rooting like a pig;” which seems to answer, in name as well as habits, to our woodchuck, or ground-hog. 1 The author’s attempt here at a general catalogue of the fishes, mollusks, &c., of the North-Atlantic Ocean, affords but a poor make-shift for such a list as we might fairly have expected from him of the species known to the early fishermen in the waters and seas of New England; and the account in his Voyages (pp. 104-15) is again an improvement on the present, and is confined to the inhabi- tants of our waters. The present editor has little to offer in elucidation of the list; which indeed, in good part, appears sufficiently intelligible. Compare Wood, New-Eng. Prospeét, chap. x. 60 New-Englands Rarities. A Catalogue of Fifh, that ts, of thofe that are to be feen between the Englfh Coaft and America, and thofe proper to the Countrey. Alderling. Alize, Alewrfe, becaufe great-bellied ; Olafle, Oldwife, Allow. Anchova or Sea Minnow. Aleport. A lbicore? Baroble. Barracha. Barracoutha, a fifh peculiar to the We/t-L[ndies.’ Barfiicle. Baffe! 1 “Like a herrin, but has a bigger bellie; therefore called an alewife.” — Voyages, p. 107. The other names, alize and allow, are doubtless corruptions of the French a@/ose, also in use among London fishmongers to designate shad from certain waters. — Rees’s Cyc., tx loco. The old Latin word alosa, supposed to have been always applied to the fish just mentioned, is adopted by Cuvier for the genus which includes our shad, alewife, and menhaden. 2 The tunny is so called on the coast of New England. — Storer’s Report on the Fishes of Mass., p. 48. 8 It is, notwithstanding, set down in the author’s list of fishes ‘‘ that are to be seen and catch’d in the sea and fresh waters in New England.” — Voyages, p. 113. And compare Storer, Synops. (Mem. Am. Acad., N. S., vol. ii.), p. 300. + See Voyages, p. 108. The first settlers esteemed the bass above most other fish. See Higginson’s New-England’s Plantation (Hist. Coll., vol. i. p. 120). Wood calls it (New-Eng. Prospe¢t, chap. ix.) ‘‘ one of the best fish in the country ; and though men are soon wearied with other fish, yet are they never with bass. The Indians,” he says, eat lobsters, ‘‘ when they can get no bass.” The head was especially prized; as see Wood, and also Roger Williams’s Key (Hist. Coll., vol. New-Englands Iarities. 61 Sea Bifhop, proper to the Norway Seas. [24] Rzver Bleak or Bley, a River Swallow. Sea Bleak or Bley, or Sea Camelion. Blew Fifh or Hound Fifh, two kinds, /peckled Hound Fifh, and Blew Hound Fifh called Horfe Fifh. Bonito or Dozado, or Spanifh Dolphin? River Bream. Sea Bream? Cud Bream. Bullhead or Indian Mufcle. River Bulls. Burfifh. Burret. Cackarel or Laxe. Calemarze or Sea Clerk. Catjifh.* Carp. Chare, a Fifh proper to the River Wimander in Launca/fhire. Sea Chough. Chub or Chevin. Cony Fifh. ili. p. 224). The fish is our striped bass (Labrax lineatus,Cuy.; Storer’s Report on Fishes of Mass., p. 7). Our author, at p. 37, again mentions it as one of the eight fishes which ‘‘ the Indians have in greatest request.” 1 See p. 96 as to the blue-fish, or horse-mackerel; and Storer, JZ. c.,"p. 57. 2 The bonito of our fishermen is the skipjack. — Storer, J. c., p. 49- 3 See p. 95. * See p. 96. Josselyn’s character of the fish as food is confirmed by Dr. Storer, 2. c., p. 69. = 62 Neww-Englands IKarities. Clan or Clamp Sea Cob. Cockes, or Coccles, or Coguil? Cook Fifh. - Rock Cod. Sea Cod or Sea Whiting.’ [25] Cvaé, divers kinds, as the Sea Crab, Boatfi{h, River Crab, Sea Lion, &c. 1 The clam is one of the eight fishes mentioned at p. 37 as most prized by the Indians. ‘‘ Szck’shuog (clams). This is a sweet kind of shell-fish, which all Indians generally over the country, winter and summer, delight in; and, at low water, the women dig for them. This fish, and the natural liquor of it, they boil; and it makes their broth and their nasaump (which is a kind of thickened broth) and their bread seasonable and savoury, instead of salt.” — W7lliams’s Key, &c., 2. c. p. 224. ‘‘ These fishes be in great plenty in most parts of the country: which is a great commodity for the feeding of swine, both in winter and summer; for, being once used.to those places, they will repair to them as duly, every ebb, as if they were driven to them by keepers.”— Wood, N. Eng. Prospect, l. c. The mollusk thus approved is the common clam (Afya arenaria, L.); but the poguau- hock, or quahog (Venus mercenaria, L.), ‘‘ which the Indians wade deep and dive for” (R. Williams, 7. c., p. 224), was also eaten by them, and the black part of the shell used for making their szckauwhock, or black money. Wood speaks also of ‘clams as big as a penny white loaf, which are great dainties amongst the natives” (N. E. Prospect, Z. c.); doubtless the giant clam (Mactra solidissima, Chemn.) of Gould (Report on Invertebr. of Mass., p. 51), which is still esteemed as food. g 2 See p. 36; by which it appears that the author has in view the meteauhock of the Indians; ‘‘the periwinkle, of which they make their womfam, or white money, of half the value of their suckauhock, or black money” (R. Williams, Z. c.) : supposed to be Buccinum undatum, L. (Gould, Z. c., p. 305); and possibly, also, one or two other allied shell-fish. 3 « Codsfish in these seas” (that is, Massachusetts Bay) ‘‘are larger than in Newfoundland, — six or seven making a quintal; whereas they have fifteen to . the same weight.” — Wew-Eng. Prosfe@, l. c. Compare Storer, Z. c., p. 121. Josselyn has an entertaining account of the sea-fishery, in his Voyages, pp. 210-13. Peww-Englands Marities. 63 Sea Cucumber. Cunger or Sea Eel. Cunner or Sea Roach. Cur. ae Currier, Poft, or Lacguey of the Sea. Crampfifh or Torpedo. Cuttle, or Sleeves, or Sea Angler. Clupea, the Tunnies enemy. Sea Cornet. Cornuta or Horned Fifh. Dace, Dare, or Dart. Sea Dart, Favelins. Dog-fifh or Tubarone. Dolphin. Doree. Dorrie, Goldfifh. Golden-eye, Gilt-pole, or Godline, Vellow-heads. Sea Dragon or Sea Spider, Quaviner. Drum, a Fith frequent in the Weft [ndtes. Sea Emperour or Sword Fifh. Eel, of which divers kinds.? Sea Elephant, the Leather of this Fifh will never rot, excellent for Thongs. Ears of the Sea. 1 See further of eels, and the author’s several ways of cooking them, in his Voyages, p. 111. At p. 37 of the Rarities, eels are mentioned among the fishes most prized by the Indians. ‘‘ These eels be not of so luscious a taste as they be in England, neither are they so-aguish; but are both wholesome for the body, and delightful for the taste.” — Wood, New-Eng. Prospect, chap. ix. 64 ANew-Englands Rarities. Flayl-fifh. [26] Llownder or Flook, the young ones are called Daés. Sea Flownder or Flowre. ~ Sea Fox. frogfifh. Frofifift: Frutola, a broad plain Fifh with a Tail like a half Moon. Sea Flea. Gallyfifh. Grandpi/s” or Hlerring Hog, this, as all Fifh of extraordi- nary fize, are accounted Regal Fithes. Grayling. Greedigut. Groundling. Gudgzin. Gulf. Sea Grape. Gull. Gurnard. Flake. Flaccle or Sticklebacks. Fladdock. Florfe Foot or Affes Hoof. flerring. 1 See p. 37, where it is said to be one of the fishes which ‘the Indians have in greatest request.” — “‘ Poponaumsuog” of R. Williams, Z. c., p. 225. He says, “*Some call them frost-fish, from their coming up from the sea into fresh brooks in times of frost and snow.” 2 “Grampoise; Fr. graxdpoisson ;” corrupted grampus. — Wedster, Dict. Arw-Englands Rarities. 65 Falkibut or Sea Pheafant. Some will have the Turéz7 all one, others diftinguifh [27] them, calling the young Fith of the firft Bzzttzs, and of the other Szr¢. There is no queftion to be made of it but that they are diftinét kinds of Fith.* Sea Hare? Sea Hawk. LfTartjifh. Sea Hermit. fTenfifh. Sea Hind. flornbeak, Sea Ruff and Reeves. Sea Horfeman. flog or Flying Fin. Sea Kite or Flying Swallow. Lampret or Lanzprel. Lampreys or Lamprones? Limpin. Ling, Sea Beef; the fmaller fort is called Cush. Sea Lanthorn. Sea Liver. 1 “These hollibut be little set by while bass is in season.” — Wood, J. c., chap. ix. 2 « The sea-hare is as big as grampus, or herrin-hog; and as white as a sheet. There hath been of them in Black-Point Harbour, and some way up the river; but we could never take any of them. Several have shot sluggs at them, but lost their labour.” — Voyages, p. 105. The Lefus marinus of the old writers is a naked mollusk of the Mediterranean; Laflysza depilans, L.: but Josselyn’s was a very different animal. 2 One of the fishes most valued by the Indians (p. 37); but ‘‘not much set by” by the English, according to Wood, /. c. I 66 New-Englands Rarities. Lobfter.' Sea Lizard. Sea Locufts. Lump, Poddle, or Sea Owl. Lanter. Lux, peculiar to the river Rhyne. Sea Lights. [28] Zuza, a very fmall Fifh, but exceeding beautiful, broad-bodied and blewifh of colour; when it fwims, the Fins make a Circle like the Moon. Maycril. ; Maid. Manatee. Mola, a Fith like a lump of Flefh, taken in the Venetzan Sea. Millers Thumb, Mulcet or Pollard. Molefifh. Minnow, called likewife a Pzxk; the fame name is given to young Salmonz ; it is called alfo a Within. Monkefifh- 1 “‘T have seene some myselfe that have weighed 16 pound; but others have had, divers times, so great lobsters as have weighed 25 pound, as they assure me.” — Higginson’s New-Eng. Plantation, 1. c., p. 120; with which compare Gould’s Report, &c., p. 360. ‘* Their plenty makes them little esteemed, and seldom eaten.” — Wood, New-Eng. Prospect, chap. ix. At p. 37, Josselyn counts them among the fishes, &c., most esteemed by the Indians; but Wood (Z. c.) qualifies this in a passage already cited. The Indians, it seems, sometimes dried them, ‘‘as they do lampres and oysters; which are delicate breakfast-meat so ordered.” — Fosselyn’s Voyages, p. 110. See the Indian way of catching lobsters, in Voyages, p. 140. - 2 “Munk-fish, a flat-fish like scate; having a hood like a fryer’s cowl” (p. 96)- : “ Lophius Americanus, Cuv., the sea-devil of Storer (Synops. of Amer. Fishes, in Peww-Englands Iaritics, 67 Morfe, River or Sea Horfe, freth water Mullet. Sea Mullet, Botargo or Petargo is made of their Spawn. Mufele, divers kinds? Navelfifh. Nunjifh. i Needlefifh. Sea Nettle. Oyfter’ Occulata. Perch or River Partridge. Pollack. [29] Pzper or Gavefifh. Perwwig. Perwwincle or Sea Snail or Whelk. Pike, or Frefn-water Wolf, or River Wolf, Luce and Lucerne, which is an overgrown Pzke. Pilchard, when they are dried as Red Herrings they are called Fumadoes. Pilot Fifh. Plaice or Sea Sparrow. Polipe or Pour-Contrel. : Mem. Amer. Acad., N. S., vol. ii. p. 381), is called monk-fish in Maine. — Wii- liamson, Hist., vol. i. p. 157. 1 See p. 97- 2 «The muscle is of two sorts, —sea-muscles (in which they find pearl) and river-muscles.” — Voyages, p. 110. See p. 37, of the present volume, for an ac- count of ‘‘the scarlet muscle,” which . . . yieldeth a perfect purple or scarlet juice; dyeing linnen so that no washing will wear it out,” &c. This could scarcely have been a Purpura or Buccinum. 3 See Voyages, p. 110. ‘‘The oysters be great ones,” says Wood; ‘‘in form of a shoe-horn: some be a foot long. These breed on certain banks that are bare 68 New-Englands Warities. Porpuife or Porpifs, Molebut, Sea Hog, Sus Marinus, Turfion. Prict Fifh or Sea Prieft. Prawn or Crangone. Punger. Patella. Powt, the Feathered Fifh, or Fork Fifh. River Powt. Purfefifn, or Indian Reverfus, like an Eel; having a Skin on the hinder part of her Head, like a Purfe, with ftrings, which will open and {hut. Parrat}ifh. Purplefifh. Porgee. Remora, or Suck Stone, or Stop Ship. Sea Raven. [30] Roch or Roach. Rochet or Rouget. Luff or Pope. Sea Rau. Salinons Sarlfifh. every spring-tide.”— New-Eng. Prosped@, chap. ix. This was in the waters of Massachusetts Bay, where Higginson (New-Eng. Plantation, 7. c., p. 120) also speaks of their being found. The question whether the oyster is an indigenous inhabitant of our bay, or only an introduced stranger, is considered by Dr. Gould (Report on Invert. Animals of Mass., pp. 135, 365). 1 One of the fishes ‘“‘in greatest request” among the Indians (p. 37). Wood says it ‘‘is as good as it is in England, and in great plenty in some places.” — New-Eng. Prosped, chap. ix. He-Englands $Raritics. 69 Scallope or Venus Coccle. Scate, or Ray, or Grifilefifn; of which divers kinds; as sharp snowted Ray, Rock Ray, Ge. Shad. Shallow. Sharpling. Spurling. Sculpin. Sheepfhead. Soles, or Tonguefi{h, or Sea Capon, or Sea Partridge. Seal, or Sozl, or Zeal? Sea Calf, and (as fome will have it) Moledut. Sheathfifh* Sea Scales. Sturgeon; of the Roe of this Fifh they make Cavzare, or Cavialtee. 1 “« The shads be bigger than the English shads, and fatter.” — Wood, l. c. 2 “ Taut-auog (sheep’s-heads).” So Roger Williams’s Key, 2. c., p. 224. It is probable, therefore, that our author had the fish that we call tautog in his mind here. What is now called sheep’s-head is not known in Massachusetts Bay and northward. — Storer, 1. c., p. 36. 3 See p. 34; and Wood, Z. c., chap. ix. * See p. 96. It appears to be the mollusk, the shell of which is well known as the razor-shell (Solen ensis , L. ). — Gould, Report, p. 28. 5 See p. 32. ‘‘The sturgeons be all over the country; but the best catching of them is upon the shoals of Cape Cod and in the river of Merrimack, where much is taken, pickled, and brought to England. Some of these be 12, 14, and 18 feet long.” — Wood, New-Eng. Prospect, chap. ix. R. Williams says that ‘the na- tives, for the goodness and greatness of it, much prize it; and will neither furnish the English with so many, nor so cheap, that any great trade is like to be made of it, until the English themselves are fit to follow the fishing.” — Key, J. c., p. 224. It is one of Josselyn’s eight fish which are in ‘‘ greatest request” with the Indians (p- 37)- He calls ‘‘ Pechipscut” River, in Maine, ‘‘famous for multitudes of mighty large sturgeon.” — Voyages, p. 204. at 70 Heww-Englands Warities. Shark or Bunch, several kinds.! Smelt. Szaccot. [31] Shrimp. Spyfifh. Spitesif{h. Sprat. Spungefifh. Sgucll. Squid? Sunfi/h. Starfifhe Swordfifh. Tench. Thornback or Neptunes Beard. Thunnie, they cut the Fifh in pieces like fhingles and powder it, and this they call MWelandria. Sea Toad. Tortotfe, Torterfe, Tortuga, Tortiffe, Turcle or Turtle, of divers kinds.* Trout? 1 See Voyages, pp. 105-6. 2 «This fish is much used for bait to catch a cod, hacke, polluck, and the like sea-fish.” — Voyages, p. 107. It is still so used. 3 Described at p. 95. * See p. 34 of this, and p. 109 of the Voyages, where the author says, ‘‘ Of sea-turtles, there are five sorts; of land-turtles, three sorts, —one of which is a right land-turtle, that seldom or never goes into the water; the other two being the river-turtle and the pond-turtle.” — See also the author’s observations on sea- turtles, at p. 39 of the Voyages. 5 “Trouts there be good store in every brook; ordinarily two and twenty inches long. Their grease is good for the piles and clifts.” — Voyages, p. 110.. PHetw-Englands Warities. al Turbut. Sea Tun. Sea Tree. Urantscopus. Ulatife or Sawfi/h, having a Saw in his Forehead three foot long, and very fharp. Umber. Sea Urchin. [32) Sea Unicorn or Sea Mononeros. Whale, many kinds.’ Whiting or Merling, the young ones are called Weerlings and Mops. Whore? Yardjifn, Affes Prick or Shamefifh. The Sturgeon. The Sturgeon, of whofe Sounds is made Ifinglafs, a kind of Glew much ufed in Phyfick: This Fifh is here in great plenty, and in fome Rivers fo numerous, that it is hazardous for Canoes and the like {mall Veffels to pafs to and again, as in Pechzp/cut River to the Eaftward. The Cod. The Cod, which is a ftaple Commodity in the Country. 1 See Storer’s Report, p. 146. 2 See p. 35; and Voyages, p. 104. ‘‘The natives cut them in several parcel, and give and send them far and near for an acceptable present or dish.” — R#. Williams, Key, l. c., p. 224. 2 See Voyages, p. 110. This is the common sea-egg; Echinus granulatus, Say. — Gould’s Rep., p. 344. 72 New-Englands MKavrities. To ftop Fluxes of Blood. In the Head of this Fifth is found a Stone, or rather a Bone, which being pulveriz’d and drank in any convenient liquor, will {top Womens overflowing Courfes notably: Likewife, [33] for the Stone. There is a Stone found in their Bellies, in a Bladder againft their Navel, which being pulveriz’d and drank in White-wine Poffet or Ale, is prefent Remedy for the Stone. : To heal a green Cut. About their Fins you may find a kind of Lowfe, which healeth a green Cut in fhort time. To veftore them that have melted their Greafe. . Their Livers and Sounds eaten, is a good Medicine for to reftore them that have melted their Greafe. The Dogfi/n. The Dogfi/h, a ravenous Fith. ‘ For the Toothach. Upon whofe Back grows a Thorn two or three Inches long, that helps the Toothach, fcarifying the Gums there- with. Their Skins are good to cover Boxes and Inftrument Cafes. Hew-Englands Warities. 73 [34] Zhe Stingray. The Stxgray, a large Fifh, of a rough Skin, good to cover Boxes and Hafts of Knives, and Rapier fticks. The Tortous. The Turtle or Tortous, of which there are three kinds: 1. The land Turtle; they are found in dry fandy Banks, under old Houfes, and never go into the water. For the Ptifick, Confumption, and Morbus Galhicus. They are good for the Ptifick and Confumptions, and fome fay the Morbus Gallicus. 2. The River 7urt/e, which are venomous and ftink. 3. The Zurtle that lives in Lakes and is called in Virginia a Terrapine. The Sozte. The Soz/e or Sea Calf, a Creature that brings forth her young ones upon dry land, but at other times keeps in the Sea preying upon Fith. [35] for Scalds and Burns, and for the Mother. The Oyl of it is much ufed by the Zzazans, who, eat of it with their Fifh, and anoint their limbs therewith, and their Wounds and Sores: It is very good for Scalds and Burns; and the fume of it, being caft upon Coals, will bring Women out of the Mother Fits. The Hair upon J} 74 New-Englands Warities. the young ones is white, and as foft as filk; their Skins, with the Hair on, are good to make Gloves for the Winter. The Sperma Ceti Whale. # The Sperma Ceti Whale differeth from the Whales that yield us Whale-bones, for the firft hath great and long Teeth, the other is nothing but Bones with Taffels hang- ing from their Jaws, with which they fuck in their prey. What Sperma Cetz ts. It is not long fince a Sferma Ceti Whale or two were caft upon the fhore, not far from Boffox in the Maffachu- Jetts Bay, which being cut into fmall pieces and boiled in Cauldrons, yielded plenty of Oyl; the Oyl put up into Hogfheads, and {tow’d into Cellars for fome time, Candies ~ at the [36] bottom, it may be one quarter; then the Oy] is drawn off, and the Candied Stuff put up into convenient Veffels is fold for Sperma Cetz, and is right *Sperma Cetz. for Brutfes and Aches. The Oyl that was drawn off Candies again and again, if well ordered; and is admirable for Bruifes and Aches. ~*~ What Ambergreece 2s. Now you muft underftand this Whale feeds upon Am- bergreece, aS is apparent, finding it in the Whales Maw in great quantity, but altered and excrementitious: I con- ceive that Amébergreece is no other than a kind of Mufh- room growing at the bottom of fome Seas; I was once tit Hew-Englands Waritics. 75 fhewed (by a Mariner) a piece of Ambergreece having a root to it like that of the land Mufhroom, which the Whale breaking up, fome {cape his devouring Paunch, and is afterwards caft upon fhore. The Coccles A kind of Coccle, of whofe Shell the Zzdzans make their Beads called Wompampeag and Mohaicks, the firft are white, the other blew, both Ovien¢, and beau[37|tified with a purple Vein. The white Beads are very good to ftanch Blood. The Scarlet Mufcle. The Scarlet Mufcle, at Pafchatawey a Plantation about fifty leagues by Sea Eaftward from Bofon, in a {mall Cove called Bakers Cove there is found this kind of JZu/fcle which hath a purple Vein, which being prickt with a Needle yieldeth a perfect purple or fcarlet juice, dying Linnen fo that no wafhing will wear it out, but keeps its luftre many years: We mark our Handkerchiefs and Shirts with it? fifh of greatest Efieem tn the Weft [ndtes. The /udians of Peru efteem of three Fifhes more than any other, vzz. the Sea Tortez/e, the Tubaron, and the 1 See p. 24 and note. 2 Our author’s account of the fishes of New England may take this of old Wood (N. E. Prospett, /. c.) for a tail-piece. ‘‘The chief fish for trade,” says . 76 PNew-Englands Rarities. Manate,' or Sea Cow; but in New-England the Indians have in greateft requeft, the Ba/s, the Sturgeon, the Sal- mon, the Lamprey, the Eel, the Frof-ji/h, the Lobfer and the Clam. [38] Fourthly, Of Serpents, and Inseéts, The Pond Frog? He Pond Fyog, which chirp in the Spring like Spa- vows, and croke like Toads in Autumn: Some of thefe when they fet upon their breeeh are a Foot high; he, ‘‘is acod; but, for the use of the country, there is all manner of fish, as fol- loweth : — ‘*The king of waters, — the sea-shouldering Whale; The snuffing Grampus, with the oily seal; The storm-presaging Porpus, Herring-hog; Line-shearing Shark, the Cat-fish, and Sea-dog; The scale-fenced Sturgeon; wry-mouthed Hollibut; The flouncing Salmon, Codfish, Greedigut ; Cole, Haddick, Hake, the Thornback, and the Scate, (Whose slimy outside makes him seld’ in date ;) The stately Bass, old Neptune’s fleeting post, That tides it out and in from sea to coast; Consorting Herrings, and the bony Shad; Big-bellied Alewives; Mackrels richly clad With rainbow-colour, the Frost-fish and the Smelt, As good as ever Lady Gustus felt ; The spotted Lamprons; Eels; the Lamperies, That seek fresh-water brooks with Argus-eyes: These watery villagers, with thousands more, Do pass and repass near the verdant shore.” 1 See p. 97- 2 The account in the Voyages (pp. 114-23) is better; and Wood’s, in New- England’s Prospect, chap. xi. (to which last, Josselyn was possibly indebted), far better. 3 See ‘the generating of these creatures,” in Voyages, p. 119. ‘‘ Here, like- New-Englands Rarities. Wa the Zndians -will tell you, that up in the Country there are Pond “frogs as big as a Child of a year old. for Burns, Scalds, and [Inflammations. They are of a gliftering brafs colour, and very fat, which is excellent for Burns and Scaldings, to take out the Fire, and heal them, leaving no Scar; and is alfo very good to take away any Inflammation. The Rattle Snakes The Rattle Snake, who poyfons with a Vapour that comes thorough two crooked Fangs in their Mouth; the hollow of thefe Fangs are as black as Ink: The Jxazans, when weary with travelling, will [39] take them up with their bare hands, laying hold with one hand behind their Head, with the other taking hold of their Tail, and, with their teeth tear off the Skin of their backs, and feed upon them alive; which they fay refrefheth them. For frozen Limbs, Aches, and Brutfes. They have Leafs of Fat in their Bellies, which is ex- cellent to annoint frozen Limbs, and for Aches ‘and wise,” says Wood, ‘‘be great store of frogs, which, in the spring, do chirp and whistle like a bird; and, at the latter end of summer, croak like our English frogs." — lV. Eng. Prosped, l. c. In his Voyages, Josselyn speaks (as Wood had done) of the tree-toad, and also of another kind of toad; and of ‘‘the eft, or swift, . . . a most beautiful creature to look upon; being larger than ours, and painted with glorious colours: but I lik’d him neyer the better for it” (p. IIQ). 1 Wood’s account (New-Eng. Prospeét, Z. c.) is worth comparing with Higgin- son’s (New-England’s Plantation, 7. c.) and with Josselyn’s, both here and at pp. 78 New-Englands Warities. Bruifes wondrous foveraign. Their Hearts fwallowed freth, is a good Antidote againft their Venome, and their Liver (the Gall taken out) bruifed and applied to their Bitings is a prefent Remedy. 23 and 114 of the Voyages. Wood justly says of this ‘‘most poisonous and dan- gerous creature,” that it is ‘nothing so bad as the report goes of him. . . . He is naturally,” he continues, ‘“‘the most sleepy and unnimble creature that lives; never offering to leap or bite any man, if he be not trodden on first: and it is their desire, in hot weather, to lie in paths where the sun may shine on them; where they will sleep so soundly, that I have known four men to stride over them, and never awake her. . . . Five or six men,” he adds, ‘‘ have been bitten by them; which, by using of snake-weed” (compare the preface to this, p. 119), ‘“cwere all cured; never any yet losing his life by them. Cows have been bitten; but, being cut in divers places, and this weed thrust into their flesh, were cured. I never heard of any beast that was yet lost by any of them, saving one mare” (2. c.). Of other serpents, Wood mentions the black snake; and Josselyn, in his Voyages (. c.), speaks of ‘‘infinite numbers, of various colours; ” and especially of ‘one sort that exceeds all the rest; and that is the checkquered snake, having as many colours within the checkquers shadowing one another as there are in a rainbow.” He says again, ‘‘ The water-snake will be as big about the belly as the calf of a man’s leg” which is, perhaps, the water-adder. Josselyn adds, ‘‘I never heard of any mischief that snakes did” (2. c.); and so Wood: ‘“‘ Neither doth any other kind of snakes” (the rattle-snake always excepted, as no doubt dangerous when trodden on) ‘‘molest either man or beast.” There are perhaps no worse: prejudices in common life, than those which breed cruelty. In the Voyages (p. 23), our author makes mention “‘of a sea-serpent, or snake, that lay quoiled up like a cable upon a.rock at Cape Ann. A boat passing by with English aboard, and tavo Indians, they would have shot the serpent: but the Indians disswaded them; saying, that, if he were not kill’d outright, they would be all in danger of their lives.” This was from ‘‘some neighbouring gentlemen in our house, who came to welcome me into the countrey;” and it seems, that, ‘‘ amongst variety of discourse, they told me also of a young lyon (not long before) killed at Piscat- away by an Indian;” which, indeed, was possibly not without foundation. And as, to the serpent, compare a Report of a Committee of the Linnzan Society of New England relative to a large marine animal, supposed to be a serpent, seen near Cape Ann, Mass., in August, 1817 (Boston, 1817); which contains also a full account of a smaller animal—supposed not to differ, even in species, from the large — which was taken on the rocks of Cape Ann. — See also Storer, Report on the Reptiles of Mass.; Supplement, p. 410. . New-Englands Barities. 79 Of Inseéts.’ A Bug. Here is a certain kind of Bug like a Beetle, but of a gliftering brafs colour, with four ftrong Tinfel Wings; their Bodies are full of Corruption or white Matter like a Maggot; being dead, and kept awhile, they will ftench odioufly; they beat the Hummzng Birds from the Flowers. [40] The Wafp. . The Wa/gs in this Countrey are pied, black and white, breed in Hives made like a great Pine Apple, their entrance is at the lower end, the whole Hive is of an Afh Colour, but of what matter its made no man knows; wax it is not, neither will it melt nor fry, but will take fire fuddenly like Tinder: this they faften to a Bow, or build it round about a low Bufh, a Foot from the ground. The flying Gloworm. The flying Gloworm, flying in dark Summer Nights like fparks of Fire in great number; they are common liewife, in Paleftina. 1 The author continues his entomological observations, in his Voyages, p. 115; and the account is fuller than Wood’s; Mew-England’s Prospect, chap. xi. 80 New-Englands Rarities. [41] Fifthly, Of Plants. AND 1. Of fuch Plants as ave common with us in ENGLAND. Edghog-grafs. Mattweed Cats-tazl3 « 1 Gerard by Johnson} p. 17, — Carex flava, L.; the first species of this genus indicated in North America, and common also to Europe. There is no doubt of the reference, taking Josselyn’s name to be meant for specific, and to refer to Gerard’s first figure with the same name. But it is certainly possible that our author had in view only a general reference to Gerard’s fourteenth chapter, ‘‘ Of Hedgehog Grasse,” which brings together plants of very different genera; and, in this case, his name is of little account. Cutler (Account of Indig. Veg., Z. c., 1785) mentions three genera of Cyferacee, but not Carex; nor did he ever pub- lish that description of our true Gramznee ‘‘ and other native grasses,” which, he says (. c., p. 407), ‘‘may be the subject of another paper.” The first edition of Bigelow’s Florula Bostoniensis (1814) has seven species of Cavex, which are in- creased to seventeen in the second edition (1824); the list embracing the most common and conspicuous forms. The genus has since been made an object of special study, and the number of our species, in consequence, greatly increased. A list of Carices of the neighborhood of Boston, published by the present writer in 1841 (Hovey’s Mag. Hort.), gives forty-seven species; and Professor Dewey’s Report on the Herbaceous Plants of Massachusetts, in 1840, reckons ninety-one species within the limits of his work. 2 Johnson’s Gerard, p. 42, English matweed, or helme (the other species being excluded, as not English, by our author’s caption); which I take to be Calamagrostis arenaria (L.) Roth, of Gray, Man., p. 548; called sea-matweed in England, and common to Europe and America. But if the author only in- tended to refer to Gerard’s ‘‘ Chapter 34, of Mat-weed,” — which is perhaps, on the whole, unlikely, — his name is of no value. 8 Gerard, p. 46, — Typha latzfolia, L., —common to America and Europe. Pew-Englands WMarities. 81 Stichwort, commonly taken here by ignorant People for Eyebright; it blows in Fune. Blew Flower-de-luce; the roots are not knobby, but long and ftreight, and very white, with a multitude of ftrings.’ To provoke Vomit and for Brutfes. It is excellent for to provoke Vomiting, and for Bruifes on the Feet or Face. They Flower in Yune, and grow upon dry fandy Hills as well as in low wet Grounds. Yellow baftard Daffodil; it flowereth in May, the green leaves are {potted with black {pots.? Dogftones, a kind of Satyrion, whereof there are feveral kinds groweth in our Salt Martfhes.* [42] Zo procure Love. I once took notice of a wanton Womans compounding the folid Roots of this Plant with Wine, for an Amorous Cup; which wrought the defired effect. 1 Gerard, p. 47,— Stellaria graminea, L.; for which our author mistook, as did Cutler a century after, the nearly akin S. Jong¢folia, Muhl. 2 Appears not to be meant for a specific reference to any of Gerard’s species; but only an indication of the genus, with the single distinguishing character of color, which was enough to separate the New-England plants from the only British one referred by Gerard to Iris. Both of our blue-flags are peculiar to the country. 3 Not one of Gerard’s bastard daffodils, but his dog’s-tooth, p. 204 (Zrythro- nium, L..). Our common dog’s-tooth was at first taken for a variety of the European, but is now reckoned distina. * Gerard, p. 205, — Orchis, L., etc. It is here clear that the name is used only in a general way. The second name (Satyrzon), perhaps, however, makes our author’s notion a little more definite, and permits us to refer the plants he had probably in view to species of Platanthera, Rich. (Gray, Man., p. 444), of which only one is certainly known to be common to us and Europe. K 82 New-Englands Rarities, Watercreffes Red Lilhes grow all over the Country innumerably amoneft the fmall Bufhes, and flower in Fune.? Wild Sorrel. Adders Tongue comes not up till Fuxe; I have found it upon dry hilly grounds, in places where the water hath ftood all Winter, in Auzgw/?, and did then make Oyntment of the Herb new gathered; the faireft Leaves grow amoneft fhort Hawthorn Buthes, that are plentifully grow- ing in fuch hollow places.* One Blade? Lilly Convalhe, with the yellow Flowers grows upon rocky banks by the Sea.® 1 Gerard, em. p. 257, — Nasturtium officinale, L. Reckoned also by Cutler, and indeed naturalized in some parts of the country (Gray, Man., p. 30); but our author had probably WV. falustre, DC. (marsh-cress), if any thing of this genus, and not rather Cardamine hirsuta, L. (hairy lady’s smock), in his mind. Both the last are common to us and Europe. — Gray, 1. c. 2 Gerard, p. 192. Lilium bulbiferum (the garden red lily) is meant; for which our author mistook our own red lily (ZL. Phzladelphicum, L.). 3 Of the two plants, —either of which may possibly have been in view of the author here, — the sorrell du bois, or white wood-sorrel of Gerard, p. 1101 (Oxalzs acetosella, L.) which is truly common to Europe and America, and the sheep’s sorrel (Gerard, p. 397, — Rumex acetosella, L.), which inhabits, indeed, the whole northern hemisphere, but is taken by Dr. Gray to be a naturalized weed here, I incline to think the latter less likely to have escaped Josselyn’s attention than the former, and to be what he means to say appeared to him as native, in 1671. For the yellow wood-sorrel, see farther on. 4 Gerard, em., p. 404, — Ophioglossum vulgatum, L.; common to us and Europe. 5 Gerard, em., p. 409, — Smzlacina bifolia (L.), Ker; common to us and Europe. ® Gerard, em., p. 410. A mistake of our author’s, which can hardly be set right. The station is against the plant’s having been Symvlacina trifolia (L.), Desf. But it may be that Clintonza borealis (Ait.) Raf., was intended. Pew-Englands Rarities. 83 Water Plantane, here called Water fuck-leaves.' For Burns and Scalds, and to draw Water out of fwel’d Legs. It is much ufed for Burns and Scalds, and to draw water out of fwell’d Legs. ears feed much upon this Plant, fo do the Moofe Deer. [43] Sea Plantane, three kinds. Small-water Archer? Autumn Bell Flowers White Hellibore, which is the firft Plant that {prings up in this Country, and the firft that withers; it grows in deep black Mould and Wet, in fuch abundance, that you may in a {mall compafs gather whole Cart-loads © of it.® 1 Alisma plantago, L., common to Europe and America; ‘called, in New England, water suck-leaves and scurvie-leaves. You must lay them whole to the leggs to draw out water between the skin and the flesh.” — Fosselyn’s Voyages, p- 80. As to its medicinal properties, see Gerard, p. 419; and Wood and Bache, Dispens., p. 1293- 2 Plantago maritima, L. (Gerard, p. 423), a native of Europe and America, is our only sea-plantain. One of the others was probably Triglochin. 3 Sagittaria sagittifolia, L. (now called arrowhead), common to Europe and America; though here passing into some varieties which are unknown in the European Floras. * Gentiana saponaria, L., peculiar to America, but nearly akin to the Euro- pean G. pnueumonanthe, L., which our author intended. — Foknson’s Gerard, edit. cit., p- 438. 5 The plant is green hellebore (Veratrum viride, Ait.); so near, indeed, to the white hellebore (V. album, L.) of Europe, that it was taken for it by Michaux. In his Voyages, the author, after speaking of the use of opium by the Turks, says, ‘* The English in New England take white hellebore, which operates as fairly with them as with the Indians,” &c. (p. 60); and see p. 76, further. 84 New-Englands Warities. Wounds and Aches Cured by the Indians. For the Tooth- ach. for Herpes milhares. The Zxzadzans Cure their Wounds with it, annointing the Wound firft with Raccoons greefe, or Wild-Cats greefe, and ftrewing upon it the powder of the Roots; and for Aches they fcarifie the grieved part, and annoint it with one of the forefaid Oyls, then ftrew upon it the powder: The powder of the Root put into a hollow Tooth, is good for the Tooth-ach: The Root fliced thin and boyled in Vineager, is very good againtt Herpes Milliaris. Avfmart, both kinds." Spurge Time, it grows upon dry fandy Sea Banks, and is very like to Rupéer-wort, it is full of Milk? Rupter-wort, with the white flower.® 1 Polygonum lapathifolium, L. (Hydropiper of Gerard, p. 445), — for which, perhaps, P. hydropiper, L., was mistaken,—and P. Persicaria, L. (Persicaria maculosa of Gerard, Z. c.), are what the author means; being the two sorts figured by Gerard himself. The third, added by Johnson, is unknown in this country; and the fourth belongs to a very different genus. P. Persicaria is marked as introduced in the late Mr. Oakes’s catalogue of the plants of Vermont; and both this and P. hydropifer are considered to be naturalized weeds by Dr. Gray (Man., P- 373). Josselyn’s testimony as to the former, as appearing to him to be native in 1671, is therefore not without interest; and possibly it is not quite worthless as to the latter. 2 Chamesyce, or spurge-time, of Gerard (edit. cit., p. 504), is Euphorbia chamesyce, L., a species belonging to the Eastern continent; for which Sloane (czt. L. Sf. Pl. in loco) appears to have mistaken our Euphorbia maculata, L.; while Plukenet (Alm. 372, czt. ZL.) recognizes the affinity of the same plants, calling the latter Chame@syce altera Virginiana. Josselyn’s spurge-time may be £. maculata; but quite possibly, taking the station which he gives into the account, £. polygonzfolia, L. 8 There are ‘‘several sorts of spurge,” according to the Voyages (p. 78); of which this, which I cannot specifically refer, is possibly one. AHew-Englands Rarities. 85 Jagged Rofe-penny-wort.' [44] Soda barigha, or maffacote, the Atfhes of Soda, of which they make Glaffes. Glafs-wort, here called Berrelia, it grows abundantly in Salt Marfhes. St. John’s- Wort. St. Peter’s- Worts 1 To this species of Saxéfraga, L., unknown to our Flora (Gerard, p. 528), our author, with little doubt, referred the pretty S. Virgintensts, Michx. — See p. 58 of this, note. 2 Gerard, em., p. 535, — Salicornia herbacea, L. But Tinneae referred one of Clayton’s Virginia specimens (the rest he did not distinguish from S. herbacea) to a variety, 8. Virginica (which he took to be also European; S¢. Pa. ae and afterwards raised this to a species, as S. Virginica, Syst. Nat., vol. b Willd. SZ. Pi., vol. i. p. 25. To this the more common glasswort Se our aan marshes is to be referred; and we possess, beside, a still better representative of the European plant in S. mucronata, Bigel. (FU. Bost., edit. 2, p. 2), which may perhaps best be taken for a peculiar variety (S. herbacea, 3. mucronata, articu- lorum dentibus squamisque mucronatis, Exum. Pl. Cantab., Ms.; and S. Vir- &tnica may well be another) of a species common to us and Europe. It is certain that we have plants striétly common to American and European Floras, in which the differences referable to difference of atmospheric and other like conditions are either not apparent or of no account; and it is possible that there are yet other species, now considered peculiar to America, which only differ from older Eu- ropean species in those characters — whether of exuberance mostly, or also of impoverishment — in which an American variety of a plant, common to America and Europe, might beforehand be expected to differ from an European state of the same. ‘‘Linnzus ut Tournefortii errores corrigeret, varietates nimis con- traxit.”— Link, Phil. Bot., p. 222. 3 Hypericum perforatum, L. (‘‘ Hypericum, S. Fohn’s-wort; in shops, Perfo- rata.” — Gerard, edit. cit., p. 539). The species is considered to have been in- troduced, by most American authors; and it is possible that Josselyn had #. corymbosum, Muhl., in his mind. * Hypericum quadrangulum, L. (Gerard, p. 542); for which our author doubt- less mistook H. mutilum, L. (H. parviflorum, Willd.), a species peculiar to America; to which Cutler’s H. guadrangulum (Account of Indig. Veg., 7. c., p. 474) is probably also to be referred. 86 Neww-Englands Rarities. Speed-well Chick-weed. Male fluellin, or Speed-well? Upright Pentroyal. Wild-Mint- Cat-Mint? Egrimony& The leffer Clot-Bur. Water Lilly, with yellow Flowers, the J/xdians Eat the Roots, which are long a boiling, they taft like the Liver of a Sheep, the 17o0fe Deer feed much upon them, at which time the /zazans kill them, when their heads are under water.® Dragons, their leaves differ from all the kinds with us, they come up in Fune.° 1 Veronica arvensis, L. (Gerard, p. 613),—a native, at present, of Europe, Asia, Northern Africa, and North America (Benth., in DC. Prodr., vol. x. p. 482); but considered to have been introduced here. 2 Veronica, L. The species is perhaps V. offcznalis, L.; which, together with V. serpyllifolia, L., is considered by Prof. Gray to be both indigenous and intro- duced here. — Man. Bot., pp. 200-1. 8 Hedeoma pulegiordes (L.) Pers. (American pennyroyal), is doubtless meant. The specific name indicates its resemblance — in smell and taste particularly — to Mentha pulegium, L.; for which our author and Cutler (2. c., p. 461) mistook it. But the former is peculiar fo America. * Mentha aquatica, L. Sp. Pl. (Gerard, p. 684); for which it is likely our author (and also Cutler, 7. c.,._p. 460) mistook MZ. Canadensis, L., Gray. 5 Nepeta cataria, L. (Gerard, em., p. 682); considered by American botanists to have been introduced from Europe. ® Agrimonia Eupatoria, L. (Gerard, em., p. 712); common to America and Europe. 7 Nanthium strumarium, L., Gray (Gerard, p. 809); common, as a species, to both continents; but in part, also, introduced. — Gray, Man., p. 212. 8 Nuphar advena, Ait.,—the common American species, —is meant; and this, though resembling WV. Zutea, Sm., of Europe, is distinct from it. 8 Arum, L. (Gerard, p. 381). The New-England species “ differ,” as our author says, ‘‘ from all the kinds” in the Old World. Neww-Englands Marities. 87 Violets of three kinds, the White Violet which is. fweet, but not fo ftrong*as our Blew Violets; Blew Violets without fent, and a Reddifh Violet without fent; they do not blow till Fane. [45] For fwell’d Legs. Wood-bine, good for hot fwellings of the Legs, foment- ing with the decoGtion, and applying the Feces in the form of a Cataplafme? Salomons-Seal, of which there is three kinds; the firft common in Exzg/land, the fecond, Virgznza Salomons-Seal, and the third, differing from both, is called Treacle Berries, having the perfe& taft of Treacle when they are ripe; and will keep good along while; certainly a very whol- fome Berry, and medicinable.® 1 None of the species, presumably here meant, are common to America and Europe. Our author’s white violet is Viola blanda, Willd. 2 All our true honeysuckles (‘‘ woodbinde, or honisuckles,” — Gerard, p. 891; Caprifolium, Juss.) are distinét from those of Europe; but what the author meant here is uncertain. 3 Convallaria, L.; Polygonatum, Tourn.; Smilacina, Desf. Many botanists have referred our smaller Solomon’s seal to the nearly akin C. multiflora of Eu- rope; but Dr. Gray (Manual, p. 466) pronounces the former a distinct American species. The second of Josselyn’s species is the ‘‘ Polygonatum Virgintanum, or Virginian’s Salomon’s seale” of Johnson’s Gerard (p. 905), and also of Morison (Hist., czt. Z.), and earliest described and figured by Cornuti as P. Canadense, &c., which is Smzlacina stellata, (L.) Desf.; peculiar to America. The third is set down by our author, at p. 56, among the “‘ plants proper to the country;” and Wood (New-Eng. Prospect, chap. v.) mentions it among eatable wild fruits, by the same name. It is probably Smzlactna racemosa, (L.) Desf.,—a suggestion which I owe to my friend Rey. J. L. Russell’s notes upon Josselyn’s plants, in Hovey’s Magazine (March, April, and May, 1858); papers which were published after the manuscript of this edition had passed from the hands of the editor, — and is also confined to this continent. 88 HPew-Englands Iarities. *« Doves-Foot: Herb Robert# Knobby Cranes Bill. for A gues. Ravens-Claw, which flowers in Jay, and is admirable for Agues." Cinkfoil? Tormentile. Avens, with the leaf of Mountane-Avens, the flower and root of Exglifh Avens? Strawberries 1 Geranium, L. The first is G. Carolintanum, L., which nearly resembles Gerard’s dove’s-foot (p. 938); the second is G. Robertianum, L., common to us and Europe; and the third (Gerard, p. 940) — which cannot be G. dzssectum — was meant, it is likely to be taken for synonymous with the fourth, or raven’s- claw, — doubtless our lovely G. maculatum, L., which belongs to that group of species which the old botanists distinguished by the common name Geranxzum batrachioides, or crow-foot geranium, which flowers in May, and is of well-known value in medicine; and the “‘knobby” root, attributed to Josselyn’s third kind, favors this opinion. 2 The genus Pofentilla, L., in general, is perhaps intended by cinque-foil ; and although our author probably confounded the common and variable Poten- tilla Canadensis, L., with the nearly akin P. reptans and P. verna, L., of Europe, yet the larger part of our New-England species are, with little doubt, common to both continents. What Josselyn referred to Tormentzlla, L.,— a genus not now separated from Pofextilla, — was probably a state of P. Cazadenszs, which resem- bles P. reftans, L., as remarked above (and was, indeed, mistaken for it by Cut- ler, — 7. c., p. 453), as this does Tormentzlla reptans, L. 3 Geum stridum, Ait.,—not found in England, but European (Gray, Man., p- 116), —is indicated by the author’s phrase; and see the Voyages, p. 78, for his opinion of its medicinal virtue. * Fragaria vesca, L. (the common wood-strawberry of Europe), is native here, according to Oakes (Catal. Verm., p. 12), ‘‘ especially on mountains; ” and I have even gathered it, but possibly naturalized, on the woody banks of Fresh Hew-Englands Rarities. 89 Wild Angelica, majoris and mznoris.* Alexanders, which grow upon Rocks by the Sea {fhore.? [46] Yarrow, with the white Flower.’ Columbines, of a flefh colour, growing upon Rocks.* Oak of Hrerufalem? Pond in Cambridge. Our more common strawberry was not separated from the European by Linnzus, but is now reckoned a distinct species. ‘There is like- wise strawberries in abundance,” says Wood (New-England’s Prospett, 7. c.), — very large ones; some being two inches about. One may gather half a bushel in a forenoon.” — ‘“‘ This berry,” says Roger Williams (Key, in Hist. Coll., vol. iii. p- 221), ‘‘is the wonder of all the fruits growing naturally in those parts. It is of itself excellent; so that one of the chiefest doctors of England was wont to say, that God could have made, but God never did make, a better berry. In some parts, where the natives have planted, I have many times seen as many as would fill a good ship, within few miles’ compass. The Indians bruise them in a mortar, and mix them with meal, and make strawberry-bread.” Gookin also speaks of Indian-bread. — Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. i. p. 150. 1 The two plants here intended, and supposed by the author to correspond with the ‘‘wild angelica” and ‘“‘ great wilde angelica” of Gerard (pp. 999-1000), may perhaps be taken for the same which Cornuti (Canad. Pl. Hist., pp. 196- 200), thirty years before, had designated as new, —Josselyn’s Angelica sylvestris minor being Angelica lucida Canadensis of Cornuti, which is A. luctda, L. (and probably, as the French botanist describes the fruit as ‘‘ minus foliacea vulgari- bus,” also Archangelica peregrina, Nutt.); and his Angelica sylvestris major being A. atrofurpurea Canadensts of Cornuti, or A. atropurpurea, L. 2 Smyrnium aureum, L. (golden Alexanders), now separated from that genus, was mistaken, it is quite likely, for S. olusatrum, L. (true Alexanders), to which it bears a considerable resemblance. — Gerard, p. 1019. 3 Achillea millefolium, L. Oakes has marked this as introduced (Catal. Ver- mont, p. 17): but it appeared to our author, in 1672, to be indigenous; and Dr. Gray reckons it among plants common to both hemispheres. — Statistics‘of Amer. Flora, in Am. Jour. Sci., vol. xxiii. p. 70. The author’s reference is to common yarrow. — Gerard, p. 1072. * Aquilegia Canadensis, L. As elsewhere, the author probably means here only that the genus is common to both continents. 5 At p. 56, both of these are set down among the ‘‘ plants proper to the coun- try.” The first, to follow Gerard (p. 1108), is Chenopodium botrys, L.,—a native of the south of Europe, and considered as an introduced species here. It has reputation in diseases of the chest.— Wood & Bache, Dispens., p. 213. Josselyn’s L go New-Englands Rarities. Acharifion is an excellent Medicine for ftopping of the Lungs upon Cold, Ptifick, &c. Oak of Cappadocia, both much of a nature, but Oak of Hrerufalem is ftronger in operation; excellent for ftuf- fing of the Lungs upon Colds, fhortnefs of Wind, and the Ptifick; maladies that the Natives are often troubled with: I helped feveral of the /zadzaxs with a Drink made of two Gallons of MZoloffes wor, (for in that part of the Country where I abode, we made our Beer of Moloffes, Water, Bran, chips of Saffafras Root, and a little Wormwood, well boiled,) into which I put of Oak of Wrerufalem, Cat- mint, Sowthiftle, of each one handful, of Exula Campana Root one Ounce, Liquorice fcrap’d brufed and cut in pieces, one Ounce, Saffafras Root cut into thin chips, one Ounce, Anny-feed and fweet Fennel-feed, of each one Spoonful bruifed; boil thefe in a clofe Pot, upon a {oft Fire to the confumption of one Gallon, then take it off, and ftrein it gently; you may if you will [47] boil the ftreined liquor with Sugar to a Syrup, then when it is Cold, put it up into Glafs Bottles, and take thereof three or four fpoonfuls at a time, letting it run down your throat as leafurely as poflibly you can; do thus in the morning, in the Afternoon, and at Night going to Bed. Goofe-Gra/s, or Chivers.’ oak of Cappadocia (Gerard, p. 1108) is an American species, — Ambrosza elatior, L. Cutler says of it (2. c., p. 489), ‘‘It has somewhat the smell of camphire. It is used in antiseptick fomentations.” 1 Galium aparine, L. (Gerard, edit. czt., p. 1122), common to America and Europe. — Compare Gray, Man., p. 170. Aew-Englands Rarities. gl Fearn. Brakes+ Wood Sorrel, with the yellow flower. Elm? Line Tree, both kinds.* A way to draw out Oyl of Akrons, or the like, &c. Maple; of the Athes of this Tree the /zdzans make a lye, with which they force out Oyl from Oak Akorns that is highly efteemed by the Juzdzans? Dew-Gra/s.° Earth-Nut, which are of divers kinds, one bearing very beautiful Flowers.’ 1 The “ Filix mas, or male ferne,” of Gerard, edit. czt., p. 1128 (for, says he, of the *‘ divers sorts of ferne . . . there be two sorts, according to the old writers, — the male and the female; and these be properly called ferne: the others have their proper names”), is the collective designation of four species of Aspzdium ; of which all, according to Pursh, and certainly three, are natives of both conti- nents, —AA. cristatum, Filix mas, Filix femina, and aculeatum, Willd. ‘‘ Flix femina (female ferne, or brakes,” of Gerard, 7. c.) is Pteris aguilina, L.; also common to us and Europe. The other F7lices mentioned by our author are Ophioglossum vulgatum, L. (p. 42); and Adiantum pedatum, L. (p. 55). 2 Oxalis corniculata, L. (Gerard, em., p. 1202), common to Europe and America. ® Ulmus, L. There are no species common to America and Europe. + See the Voyages, p. 69, where the author has it “the line-tree, with long nuts: the other kind I could never find.” The former was Tilia Americana, L., —a species peculiar to America. = See p. 48; and Voyages, p. 69. None of our species are found in Europe. ® The plant intended is doubtless the same with that spoken of in the Voyages, p- 80.— “‘ Rosa solzs, sundew, moor-grass. This plant I have seen more of than ever I saw in my whole life before in England,” &c. Both our common New- England species of Drosera are also natives of Europe. 7 * Differing much from those in England. One sort of them bears a most beautiful flower” (p. 56, where it is rightly placed among plants ‘“‘ proper to the nt 92 New-Englands Rarities. Fufs-Balls, very large.’ Mufhrooms, fome long and no bigger than ones finger, others jagged flat, round, none like our great Mufhrooms in England, of thefe fome are of a Scarlet colour, others a deep Yellow, @c." [48] Blew flowered Pimpernel? Noble Zzver-wort, one fort with white flowers, the other with blew.’ Black-Berry? country”). The author refers here, doubtless, to Agzos ¢uberosa, Moench. (ground-nut of New England), which was raised at Paris, from American seeds, by Vespasian Robin, and figured from his specimens by Cornuti (Canad., p. 200) in 1635; but it was celebrated, ten years earlier, in “‘ Nova Anglia,”—a curious poem by the Rey. William Morrell, who came over with Capt. Robert Gorges in 1623, and spent about a year at Weymouth and Plymouth, publishing his book in 1625 (repr. Hist: Coll., vol. i. p. 125, &c.), —as follows : — ‘“‘Vimine gramineo nux subterranea suavis Serpit humi, tenui flavo sub cortice, pingui Et placido nucleo nivei candoris ab intra, Melliflua parcos hilarans dulcedine gustus, Donec in estivum Phoebus conscenderit axem. His nucleis laute versutus vescitur Indus: His exempta fames segnis nostratibus omnis Dulcibus his vires revocantur victibus alme.” 1 See p. 52 and Voyages (pp. 70, 81) for other notices of Fungi; and Voyages, p- $1, for the only mention of Alge. ‘ : 2 Female pimpernell (Gerard, em., p. 617), — Axagallis arvensis, y, Sm.; A. cerulea, Schreb.,— but scarcely differing, except in color, from the scarlet pim- pernel, which has long (‘‘in clayey ground,” — Cui#ler, 7. c., 1785) been an inhab- itant of the coasts of Massachusetts Bay, though doubtless introduced. 8 Hepatica triloba, Chaix. (Anemone hepatica, L.), common to Europe and America; occurring occasionally with white flowers. — Gerard, em., p. 1203. 4 Rubus, L. The red raspberry of this country is hardly other than an Amer- ican variety of the European (#. Jdeus, var. strigosus, caule petiolis pedunculis Aew-Englands BWarities. 93 Dew-Berry. Rafp-Berry, here called Mul-berry. Goo/e-Berries, of a deep red Colour." Haw-thorn, the Haws being as big as Services, and very good to eat, and not fo aftringent as the Haws in England? Toad flax$ calyceque aculeato-hispidissimis, Enum. Pl. Agri Cantab, 1843, Ms.) ; upon which see Gray (Man., p. 121; and Statistics, &c., 7.c., p. 81). &. ¢rifforus, Richards., is also very near to, and was once considered the same as, the European R. saxatzlis, L. The rest of our New-England raspberries and blackberries appear to be spe- cifically distin&t from those of Europe. The cloud-berry, mentioned at p. 60, is there set down among plants proper to the country; and may therefore not be the true cloud-berry (Gerard, p. 1273), or Rubus chamemorus, L., which is common to both continents. 1 The New-England gooseberries are peculiar to this country. The author no doubt intends Ribes hkirtellum, Michx. (Gray, Man., p. 137); as see further his Voyages, p. 72. 2 Crategus, L. But the species are peculiar to this country, as Josselyn im- plies with respe& to the haws which he notices. These, no doubt, included C. tomentosa, L., Gray; and perhaps, also, C. cocctnea, L. Wood says, ‘‘ The white thorn affords hawes as big as an English cherry; which is esteemed above a cherry for his goodness and pleasantness to the taste.” — New-England’s Prospect, chap. vy. At page 72 of his Voyages, the author mentions ‘‘a small shrub, which is very common; growing sometimes to the height of elder; bearing a berry like in shape to the fruit of the white thorn; of a pale, yellow colour at first, then red (when it is ripe, of a deep purple); of a delicate, aromatical tast, but somewhat stiptick,— which may be Pyrus arbutifolia, L. Higginson (New-England’s Plantation, 7. c., p. 119) speaks of our haws almost as highly as Wood. 3 Great toad-flax (Gerard, em., p. 550); Lzxarta vulgaris, Moench. Compare De Candolle (Geog. Bot., vol. ii. p. 716) for a sketch of the American history of this now familiar plant, which the learned author cannot trace before Bigelow’s date (Fl. Bost., edit. 1) of 1814. But it is certainly Cutler’s ‘‘snapdragon; . . . blossoms yellow, with a mixture of scarlet; common by roadsides in Lynn and Cambridge” (2. c., 1785): though he strangely prefixes the Linnzan phrase for Antirrhinum Canadense, L.; and there seems no reason to doubt that Josselyn may very well have seen it in 1671. 94 New-Englands Karities. Pellamount, or Mountain time.! Moufe-car Minor? The making of Oylof Akrons. To firengthen weak Mem- bers. Lor Scall’d-heads. There is Oak of three kinds, white, red and black, the white is excellent to make Canoes of, Shallopes, Ships, and other Veffels for the Sea, and for Claw-board, and Pipe-ftaves, the black is good to make Waynfcot of; and out of the white Oak Acorns, (which is the Acorn Bears delight to feed upon): The Natives draw an Oyl, taking the rotteneft Maple Wood, which being burnt to afhes, they make a {trong Lye therewith, wherein they boyl their white Oak-Acorns until the Oyl fwim on the top in great quantity; this [49] they fleet off, and put into bladders to annoint their naked Limbs, which corroba- rates them exceedingly; they eat it likewife with their Meat, it is an excellent clear and fweet Oyl: Of the Mofs that grows at the roots of the white Oak the /zdeffes make a ftrong decoétion, with which they help their Papou/es or young Childrens fcall’d Heads.’ 1 Gerard, p. 653 (Zeucrium, L.). The author may have intended to reckon the genus only. Our species is peculiar to this continent. 2 The designation is uncertain. The old botanists gave the name Aurzcula muris, or mouse-ear, to species of Myosotis, Draba, Hieracium, and Guaphalium. Josselyn’s plant may most probably be Axtennaria plantagintfolia, Hook. (mouse- ear of New England), which is very near to A. dioica -of Europe.— Gray, Statzs- tics, &c., l. c., p. 81. 3 Quercus alba, L.; 2. rubra, L.; and Q. tinoria, Bartr. Wood's account of the oaks (New-England’s Prospeet, chap. v.) is similar. In his Voyages, p. 61, Josselyn gives us “‘ the ordering of red oake for wainscot. When they have cut it New-Englands IWarities. 95 Funiper, which Cardanus faith is Cedar in hot Coun- tries, and Juniper in cold Countries; it is hear very dwarfifh and fhrubby, growing for the moft part by the Sea fide.’ Willow Spurge Lawrel, called here Poy/on berry, it kills the Engl Cattle if they chance to feed upon it, efpecially Calves.* Gaul, or noble Mirtle.* Elder? Dwarf Elder ® down and clear’d it from the branches, they pitch the body of the tree in a muddy place in a river, with the head downward, for some time. Afterwards they draw it out; and, when it is seasoned sufficiently, they saw it into boards for wainscot; and it will branch out into curious works.” 1 Funiperus communis, L.; common to both continents. But the author did not probably distinguish from it $. Virginiana, L.; which is frequent, and often dwarfish, near the sea. 2 Salix, L.; the genus only meant here, it is likely. 3 Daphne Laureola, L. (Gerard, p. 1404), with which Josselyn may have considered Kalmza angustifolia, L., in some sort allied. The latter has long been known in New England as dwarf or low laurel. * Myrica Gale, L. (Gerard, p 1414); common to Europe and America. 5 Sambucus, L. Our S. Canadensis, L. differs very little from the common elder of Europe, except, as our author in his Voyages says (p. 71), in being “shrubbie,” and in not having “a smell so strong.” — Cf. DC. Prodr., vol. ii. p. 322; Gerard, p. 1421. The other North-American elder (S. pudbens, Michx.) is at least equally near to the European S. racemosa, L., according to Prof. Gray. 5 «There is a sort of dwarf-elder, that grows by the sea-side, that hath a red pith. The berries of both”—that is, of this and of the true elder mentioned above — ‘‘are smaller than English elder; not round, but corner’d.” — Voyages, p- 71. Gerard’s dwarf-elder (p. 1425) is Sambucus ebulus, L. Josselyn’s: may have been a Viburnum ; for this genus was confused with Sambucus by the elder botanists. Wood (New-England Prospeét, chap. v.) speaks of — ‘Small eldern, by the Indian fletchers sought; ” — which was perhaps arrow-wood, or Viburnum dentatum, L. « 96 Pew-Englands Rarities. for a Cut with a Brufe. Alder; An Jndian Bruifing and Cutting of his Knee with a fall, ufed no other remedy, than Alder Bark, chewed fafting, and laid to it, which did foon heal it.’ To take Fire out of a Burn. The decoétion is alfo excellent to take [50] the Fire out of a Burn or Scalld. Lor Wounds and Cuts. For Wounds and Cuts make a ftrong decoétion of Bark of Alder, pour of it into the Wound, and drink thereof. Hafele for fore Mouths, falling of the Pallat. Filberd, both with hairy husks upon the Nuts, and fet- ting hollow from the Nut, and fill’d with a kind of water of an aftringent tafte; it is very good for fore Mouths, and falling of the Pallat, as is the whole green Nut before it comes to Kernel, burnt and pulverized. The Kernels are feldom without maggots in them, 1 Alnus, Tourn. One of the three New-England species (A. zzcana, Willd.) is common to Europe and America. Another (A. serrulata, Willd.) ‘‘bears so great a resemblance,” says F. A. Michaux, to the common European alder (A.- glutinosa, Willd.) ‘‘in its flowers, its seeds, its leaves, its wood, and its bark, as to render a separate figure unnecessary; the only difference observable between them” being ‘‘that the European species is larger, and has smaller leaves.” — Sylva, vol. ii. p. 114. Compare Gray, Statistics, &c., 7. c., p. 83. A. viridis, our third species, is common to Europe and this country. 2 Corylus, L. Our species, which are peculiar to America, are both indicated : the ‘‘filberd, . . . with hairy husks upon the nuts,” being C. rostrata, Ait. (beaked hazel); and that ‘‘setting hollow from the nut,”—that is, larger than the nut, — C. Ameriggna, Wangenh. (common hazel). =~ New-Englands Warities. 97 The Figure of the Walnut. Walnut; the Nuts differ much from ours in Europe, they being {mooth, much like a Nutmeg in fhape, and not much bigger; fome three cornered, all of them but thinly replenifhed with Kernels.’ [51] Chetnuts; very {weet in tafte, and may be (as 1 Carya, Nutt. In the Voyages, p. 69, the author speaks of the ‘walnut, which is divers: some bearing square nuts; others like ours, but smaller. There is likewise black walnut, of precious use for tables, cabinets, and the like” (Fuglans nigra, L.).° ‘*The walnut-tree,” continues Josselyn, ‘‘is the toughest wood in the countrie, and therefore made use of for hoops and bowes; there’being no yews there growing. In England, they made their bowes usually of witch- hasel” (that is, witch-elm,— Ulmus montana, Bauh., Lindl.; as see Gerard, p. 1481: but Carfznus, ‘“‘in Essex, is called witch-hasell,” — 7b.), ash, yew, the best of outlandish elm; but the Indians make theirs of walnut.” This was hickory, and what Wood says belongs doubtless to the same. He calls it ‘“‘ something different from the English walnut; being a great deal more tough and more serviceable, and altogether heavy. And whereas our guns, that are stocked with English walnut, are soon broken and cracked in frost, — being a brittle wood, — we are driven to stock them new with the country walnut, which will endure all blows and weather; lasting time out of mind.” After speaking favorably of the fruit, he adds (New-Eng. Prospedt, chap. vi.), ‘‘ There is likewise a tree, in some parts of the country, that bears a nut as big as a pear,” —the butternut, doubtless (Fuglans cinerea, L..). Josselyn has told us (p. 48) of the oil which the Indians managed to get from the acorns of the white oak. Roger Williams (Key, Z. c., p. 220) says our native Americans made ‘“‘of these walnuts .. . an excellent oil, good for many uses, but especially for the anointing of their heads.” Michaux (Sylva, vol. i. p. 163) says the Indians used the oil of the butternut, and also (p. 185) of the shag-bark, ‘to season their aliments.” Williams adds (J. c.), ‘‘ Of the chips of the walnut-tree—the bark taken off—some English in the country make excellent beer, both for taste, strength, colour, and inoffensive opening operation.” 98 New-Englands Rarities. i they ufually are) eaten raw; the /zdzans fell them to the Lxgli/hk for twelve pence the buthel.’ Beech? Afhs Quick-beam, or Wild-Afh.* Coals of Birch pulverized and wrought with the white of an Egg toa Salve, is a gallant Remedy for dry /curfy Sores upon the Shins; and for Bruifed Wounds and Cuts. Birch, white and black; the bark of Birch is ufed by the /udzans for bruifed Wounds and Cuts, boyled very tender, and ftampt betwixt two ftones to a Plaifter, and the decoétion thereof poured into the Wound; And alfo to fetch the Fire out of Burns and Scalds.’ 1 Castanea vesca, Gaertn.; common to Europe and America. Our chestnut is considered to differ from the European only as an American variety of a species common to both continents might be expected to. ‘*The Indians have an art of drying their chestnuts, and so to preserve them in their barns for a dainty all the year.” — R. Williams, 1. c. 2 Neither Wood nor R. Williams makes mention of it. The younger Michaux considered our beech distinct from the European; but Mr. Nuttall makes it only a variety of it; while Prof. Gray puts both trees in his list of ‘‘ very close repre- sentative species.” — Statistics, d-c., 1. c., p. 81. 8 Fraxinus, L. Our species are peculiar to this continent. I cannot account for Wood’s saying, ‘‘It is different from the ash of England; being brittle and good for little, so that walnut is used for it.” — Wew-Eng. Prosped, chap. vi. * Sorbus, L. (Gerard, p. 1473). Our mountain-ash (S. Americana, Willd.) is quite near to the quicken, or mountain-ash of the north of Europe.(S. aucuparia, L.); but hardly, perhaps, to be reduced to an American variety of it, as the elder Michaux (#7. Amer., vol. i. p. 290) proposed. Compare Gray, Statistics, &c., J. c., p. 82. 5 Except the small white birch (B. populifolia, Ait.), which Mr. Spach reduces to a variety of the European B. alba, L., —in which he is sustained by Prof. Gray (Man., p. 411), — and the dwarf-birch (B. zanza, L.) of our alpine regions, all our New-Englands Rarities. 99 Poplar, but differing in leaf. Plumb Tree, feveral kinds, bearing fome long, round, white, yellow, red, and black Plums; all differing in their Fruit from thofe in Exgland? Wild Purcelane? Wood-wax, wherewith they dye many pretty Colours.* species are peculiar to this continent.— See the author’s Voyages, p. 69, for an- other mention of the birches. 1 Populus, L. Our species are peculiar to the country, as the author’s remark suggests. Wood (Z. c.) notices ‘‘ the ever-trembling asps.” 2 «