M. M? A torj ^iAi/ /fi>4uLA^ /to . / . / ^0 ^ 1^*1 ^ A-4/*x ^!*--c^' firir^ &,— ’ 4> ^ /< 'i^A-iJj A) ^ "* 4-*^r* *-j / £ ^ / / £r QcZ. <3 -l>^^ ^ /SC. <* ' y^r * /t .?#£ — : v o /a^ * ** ^ ^ "~ y' ' ^ y f/i~> ^rtu^->y^, *^/>~ t" y*/> * if 'flA> MK^tAvi ^^ -—-L / &. ■ A^yar- j-i 0- — t , J - te\f a , t&*-fr(y ^T7~ • '/ — - £' «/ */r^ ica Aaa~ ft' V»vy ^A^***^ ^«xW>0 ^ ^ V Z~iL aL^LT ^™y tr - t * — y v T.' . / • ^*~~7" 1 ^ Xvuawy ^ ■»» r^‘ u. ~W- K'd Sd, ? /i *>0W - 77 V ?- >1*1 /- Ad. .. A-W^-p. _ % <3 S?_fjsjs!j. : lli -1*%-^* - n - L ' 72 ' , ' / * - / 7 * - /^ -< 2 o *■-£/*- JO*- ! *'. 'LL . X 0$ Cr^-<^J^ i / S^J^- _ i$<^Cv-i 4 a ^ 7 \ffoMdit.J C r^c^ d. Ibil ijm Jti.fr* <^W- (Ml \J Wi^C JUA, _2 / . ^ d /&' -/'/*- Jfx-'l 7* -7,7-K 3t>$. - /i f 7 7 CU««di£ . /$pU } ^ . /JJJ (OcUbiA- in* / 3 ^aj M, fioMy HKi ^ W 7 |(^/ /o'*( fouuXHiu t (Ur^Ky-tL frjA. WetAM ■ , . — . w> //»/A 4 -/‘H- 23 A- , hl4g&^l*.jV 7 So *3/ K J %&%*>'% 1%V* (0* Ji-V- »^V ll\ 2.^'* f G^r>n 4 vu C^-v^ Ujji /MK Ctv^r^- /if 7 fo " /— *»■ K-S^- 7 Concord, Mass, May fb' 1893 , tn^. & * ku{ 0 . jl i* • *t jf/+.Yti 4 §i~ / 1 J't /• y , , «* e^e tr » . V. ' 4 # frw < 4 m o, 7 “EEL, f ' 4 < . /< ^ A „ 7 . Mi'4 '/ «t; V . ^'- ; ' ^ ^/vL.'f 7 fflxnr^rJ^K. l'* %. - ! t\-y . f , { - 1 t • ^W; ■ ¥ * • < |K» 7 / ^ 4^ i^-~yU V t ^ "■'*/*'&& W* 1 GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY. 44 BROAD ST.. NEW YORK . 620 ATLANTIC AVE.. BOSTON. V « / 7 4 * z. (b / y~ ® , __ t "'Jv'-- . ^ ’•*. . GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY. 44-6ROAD ST.. NEW YORK . 620 ATLANTIC AVE.. BOSTON. RAILWAY DEPARTMENT RAILWAY SUPPLY L3^CiS( Y». ^ C^*- x /#; /f 7 * 7 / y 7 ' «/ J -OW 7 7- f jfn&rr. ^ <^i^-t^' ^t>sisic. _ ^z :.A/is£Z r (j ^fx^^dZ Xia-w-*-/ <9-7.<. fr-t+Jc dl.'fit" 'W^z-'t Z ^ (Z^ZZc+Z^z. ZZZ^t. y^Lx 7 ~~fcZ ' /ZlZ ^ **S-<*-& ~£ZZaA A- y.c^*-c-^L ”Zti 7777 t-\j-is>-/ x ty-4^ yv-/,,! / Tjr !>^.jL '~ZZz< Zr^^ZzZZ, tx- ,/_ &ASL <^£yt~ fi- l /K ■*(. d- CC^-c -'-r- zz^ tfz ^ jZ 1 7?y. iV' f.^-Z ~ ~ffZi~x^'7 ^ /c/^-/” ZZ'ZZ-x^^ Zjj-\ — <_^» y^^ZT. / ^ %'i*)-rZ a -tr ^yy y t -,.,_ y , - _ . ^ , !-- L'&"if-X— / s J Z £ ‘ z'l /tyi 4*1 o- * ■ z ^' . — ZZir^z^i. .njL' / y .? a fas\sxAJs\ . t ^\, v^Vy^ ^ts*. ^yv^ , *y«^ r /U . t/ ^ *^7 ^ — A/... (^ |L«.. — ^ ^ /< AJ. AA^v>W ^ zf* ^ ^ / ^^9 7^4 (? tZ z to Piranga ervthromelas . Concord, Mass. 1895. The Scarlet Tanagers (at Ball's Hill this morning) were Sept .9. an old female accompanied by her two young which, although in full autumn plumage, followed their mother about closely and begged continually for food uttering a monotonous hue., very like the call of a young Purple Pinch, and a low, wheezy sound which was so nearly like that made by some your)g Red-eyed Vireos that I had just been watching that I could detect no difference. When approached by their mother the young Tana- gers wduld squat down on their perches and quiver their half- opened wings. I did not see her feed them. 1899. Two Tanagers were singing in Concord village, one in May 22. tree on the common, the other in the hillside burying ground. Cambridge, Mass. Adult male, xirst recoru for i/he Garden. 1899. A Tanager appeared early in the afternoon on the top of June 6. a white maple where it sang a dozen times or more before fly- ing off. It- is the^adult male that has ever visited our place within my recollection although I heard one singing years ago in the distance in the direction of the Kennedy's oaks on Highland Street. I sa w a female or juv. male in the garden, Oct . 1 , 1893. Biras of Upper St, John. B&tciieider, 40. Pyrangra rubra ( Linn .) Vie 1 the hard woods at Grand Falls. Th We did not see them at Fort Fair that they occur. At Houlton Mr. arrive May 29. I have not found here. They remain all summer. ” yrangra rubra (Linn.) Vieill. Scarlet TANAGER.-Not rare in woods at Grand Falls. The people there call them “war-birds. WUUUO O.L - 1 r not see them at Fort Fairfield, though we have reason to think „ occur. At Houlton Mr. McLeod says they are “rare. They IbUtl . “ , 29. I have not found the nest, but have a young one taken They remain all summer.” Birds Of Southern Hew Brunswick. M, Chamberlain. 6. Pyranga rubra. Scarlet Tanager. — I saw an adult male of this species sitting on a fence in the suburbs of St. John on June 20, 1879, and have examined two specimens taken near Hampton during the summer of 1880. Bull. N.O.O, 7, April, 1882. p. 104 Occasionally birds have been met with in this vicinity that have evidently been driven off their usual haunts. For instance, some twenty years ago considerable numbers of fjctirlet Tanager s were found here about the 10th of May. Some were dead, and all were in an emaciated condition. None have been seen here since. / A . 1 2 . .p, CLuki. tn'6'. Scarlet Tanager ( Piranga erythromelas) at Ottawa, Canada. This handsome bird is becoming decidedly more abundant here than formerly. This was plainly noticeable the last spring. There were about ten around a house at Blueberry Point, a few miles from here, early in May; and at Bushwood, at the city limits — a place where a few were seen every spring, if nowhere else — thc-ir unusual abundance was noted by the most casual observer. I was told that one poor specimen of the human kind had about ten of these beauties in a trap cage. They even invaded the tree-lined streets of our city. On May 26 I noticed a female in a large willow tree next to my house, and on the 29th a fine male put a streak of color into the scene. This specimen condescended so low as to drink out of a common mudpuddle on the street, together with the English Sparrows, who, for once, stood back, awestruck and wondering as it seemed, at this great beauty. Farmers also from many points to the north, east, and west of here asked me about these birds, some saying they had seen them this CU+A,* * / f ?e>7, / r y ^ 223. Piranga erj sometimes common, May, 1888, a very large n attracted much attention. large number of these birds appeared in the city and Birds of Dead River Region, Me. F. H. 0. 42. Pyranga rubra , (Scarlet Tanager). This species is included on the authentic statement of Mr. J. L. Colcord of Augusta, who saw one Sept. 2, 1885, while at his duties as engineer of con- struction of the F. & M. R. R. It may be con- sidered common to this latitude, but I failed to detect it. O.&O. XI. Oct. 1886. p. 146 A Scarlet Tanager (Piranga erythromelas ) It is the only one seen in many years. (su2 was seen here May 22 , 1900 . U Auk, XIX, July. 1902, J Jr. -H-, /^<5rV, A^7 ZZ 7l Cov^aav-a-a>va ^Iaa^. y^VA. A^^A—cX. tA^O-O-xX ^rA-°*- 'IAa^^sCi *^Z, J A. / ^-AaaC^ 7 V ^A^CCf A\aa< {o^CaA. j/vAV(y XA^. C7 ^CCs /^ ZZT .yter wx_A_ ^ ^ /y^ dr^_ UAvt^L ^L'K ft_<^vc^T" ^ cx-v^-va_a 4 ^ C< fx^Z^ 7 a /«-^^3 La. , /^c CoG-L\^-JL. ^ CWxaAA-^ A ^<-avLa~ 6 >t-^ 4 A_y cy OacZ^ ^ xv. yv~^—-~y ux -4 ( >- <>+~a HtxSvA^ 4 y k: J^Z, . Jr. //. &LfC /3 . /Vry . ^ Iaa. ^ _^_ ^ l/^/y~*j ^^^aaAa ^^7— Tt-r~* ' J I , , V n c//. ^1~CX-aLJ " fa~b—xs^-^ f v/ jfcA^ Ci % 'i c r de $ y dd $ Yc+y ^'Z^ce ^ &Yvft\({ ^Scu^/ d / £> i +■ fejUiPj^-y V h/Hti V:(\ ^ ^ w>-aA-# Uaa*. d v ov, "2k., S'.'-f 1 ,ir ^ (fw«A. , *•"• >*^v. ^ J aJ^l -^*a ^Tvi Ij Cl\* £v3- & si / IAJ* £ V ^i-ru« 4*Ait] Ay Atju^niy tyZjd J £*- t'-jAM/ iu .1*4 ? J^i uTidtAj Atbi-L , ' J i? , rA-, TSlt. ^ ~ ^ urt.. *~X‘ d'A' c A±^'i 1 A £i^A> -j iMZ y 5-*U Cl'tJxXAlt Vvv V/i^ 2C o *' !7 *> ^4' ^ • ^-4 IW*« *- ~f?J ** A »Ao p— o Or~Q.l- i.-j $\ i*ss-Asi , Birds observed in Naval Hospital Grounds, Brooklyn, G.H.Oouea 31. Pyranga rubra. Scarlet Tanager. - An occasional visitor. •uH.N.O. 0 , 4,Jan. J 2879, p,32 Birds of the Adirondack Begion. C. H , Merxiam . S3- Pyranga rubra (. Linn .) Vieillot. Scarlet Tanager. — Commc summer resident, breeding in the hard timber. Bail, N.O.O. e.Oct, 1882, p, 229 Arrivals cfAfig’y Birds, Spring-1886, Central Park, N. Y. City. A. G. Paine, Jr. May 10, Piranga erylhromelas, (008). Scarlet Tanager. O.&O. XI, Aug. 1886. p.I 20 Birds Tioga 0©, N»Y, Aiden Loring, 161. Scarlet Tanager. Has been quite rare up to the year of 1888, when I found them to be quite common in the woods. Although I have searched many times for their nest I have not been able to find one. The song of this bird is much like that of the Robin, only not as loud. Perched on the top of a tall tree, the male will sing for some time, and then dart off on its useful mission of destroying insects. o, %©, 'xv, Mm, mm, \ uBo rtx eta, c /i a ^ ( t u <-A V ci' c:. \ L tv ] ' 'I l. r - O ^ j v J ■ / ^ fj. Ka., Z3 ft" 3 * A Scarlet Tanger. Not common. E. A. Sterling, Brooklyn, Pa. Auk, XIX, July, 1902, p.299. 23 Descriptions of First Plumage of Cer- tain Nor^h Am, Bbs. Wm. Brewster. 42. Pyranga rubra. Occasional plumage : male. Wings and tail black; entire plumage of body rich orange, with a greenish tinge on flanks and anal region. From a specimen in my cabinet, collected by Mr. C. J. Maynard, at Waltham, Mass., May 27, 1869. This remarkable specimen I for a long time con- sidered unique, but I have recently examined another in the possession of Mr. Arthur Smith, of Brookline, which is its precise counterpart, and Mr. Kid g way tells me he has seen still others. This plumage is not to be confounded with the ordinary immature one of this bird, where the scarlet is simply of a lighter shade or mixed with patches of yellowish-green. It is a pronounced uniform coloring, and apparently a completed plumage. Unquestionably it is abnormal, but hardly to be placed in a category with albinism, and probably it is not very unfrequent. Adult males of P. rubra change to the greenish autumnal plumage of the female and young, a fact not generally known. They may in that stage be distinguished by the blacker coloring of the wings and tail. I have never seen the young males in autumn with red feathers appearing in the plumage, as spoken of by writers ; probably such specimens may be referred to adult birds taken in August or September, with the moult only partially effected ; many of such examples I have now before me, all unquestionably adults. The scarlet bands on the wing-coverts of some specimens are to be regarded as individual adornments, independent of age. Many comparatively imma- ture specimens possess them, while in some of the finest birds they are wanting. Bull. N.O.Q, 3i April, 1878. p. Animistic Plumages. R.Peane. 8. Pyranga rubra. Scaklet Tanager. — Mr. F. T. Jencks, of Prov- idence, R. 1., has kindly sent me a specimen with the outer primary o one wine- white, shot at Cranston, R. I., May, 1878. In a recent letter from Mr F. A. Lucas of Rochester, N. Y., he mentions having seen a Tanager of this species with five of the tail-feathers white. Bull N.O.O. 5 , Jan., 3880, p, 2, a P Zo? . - S\ lU (Am. ™) s Ik (1 An Abnormal Scarlet Tanager. — A remarkable albino female Scarlet Tanager was procured at Germantown, May 8, 1888, and is now in my col- lection. The wings and tail are composed of pure white and ordinary blackish feathers in about equal proportions, while the wing-coverts consist of white, olive and canary-yellow feathers. All the rest of the plumage above and below is bright canary yellow, with one or two olivaceous feath- ers in the middle of the back. The legs and bill are very light pink. The bird was in company with several normal birds of the same species. — Witmer Stone, Germantown , Pa. .AjlJk, V* July, 1888. p. 3 ZZ. Plumf^e of some birds from upper So. Carolina - Leverofcl M. Loomis. Piranga erythromelas. — There is a marking on the under surface of the wing in the female and in the male in green lively which seems to have escaped general notice, but which renders both distinguishable at a glance from the female or young male of P. rubra. It extends from the carpal joint to the exposed shaft of the outer primary, and is about an inch in length and an eighth of an inch in width and olive brown in color. It corresponds to a similar black marking in the adult spring male. In all examples of P. rubra I have examined the region of the under wing-coverts is uniform yellow in the female and red in the adult male. Auk X, April, 1893 . p, 154 . S cr-wv^C COyr\ C Piranga erythromelas Vieill. s Auk, XIV, July, 1897 , p -Z 77 - Three adult male Scarlet Tanagers in the collection of Dr. A. K. Fisher have conspicuous wing markings strongly suggestive of those normally present in the western Piranga ludoviciana. In two of these birds (No. 4017, Washington, D. C., May 18, 1890, and another taken at Sing Sing, N. Y., on May 22, 1880) the greater coverts are almost wholly bright scarlet. In the other (No. 919, Sing Sing, N. Y., May 16, 1881) the greater coverts are gamboge yellow narrowly edged with black. The yellow is brighter than that occupying the same position in P. ludoviciana but the bar formed by it is not so broad as that of the western bird. S . 3 , brx. ■ o A\ u. /£* 1 / ^le-Ay^cf. ^«TI 5~- c(-Ct^j J ^ Lcv^ZZaI. ^ a Cc^f £s£C^*- tti /^-a(. - e -yj&~*( /^t<-0 £fr\r~i *0 Zj~ &X**y ^-y^Ou^b^ ‘V^-tX'l T~v, which, though an insignificant sound, when once known cannot be mistaken for the note of any other bird. Its ordi- nary call-note is likewise very distinctive. It is not often used after the close of summer, although I have heard it late in Septem- ber. Speaking of this well know chif-chir , Mr. Fred. T. Jencks, of Providence, R. I., has called my attention to what is undoubt- edly a clear instance of geographical variation in utterance. Mr. Jencks writes that he has observed that in “Illinois and Indiana it has three notes, chifi-chir-ree.” Changing from its spring and summer scarlet to autumn green, this bird goes curiously counter to the order of color change from spring to fall, which nature has adopted on so large a scale for our landscapes. The Scarlet Tanager undergoes its change in August, and early in the month may be found with its red plu- mage variously invaded by the conquering yellowish and green. I have found the male in externally perfect fall dress by mid-Sep- tember ; but feather growth continues into October, when the bird becomes excessively fat. AUk, I, Oct. , 1884. P. 3X 6 /icL <5 Scarlet Tanager. Vvymr * fcouu . ‘rtKA/'H This Tanager, the Baltimore Oriole’s rival in beauty, is the less active, the less vigorous charmer of the two, and has less vocal power ; but it would be difficult to imagine a more pleasing and delicate exhibition of a bird to both eye and ear than that pre- sented by this singer in scarlet and black, as he stands on the limb of some tall tree in the early sun, shining, and singing, high above the earth, his brief, plaintive, morning song. The Tana- ger s is an unobtrusive song, while the percussive, ringing tones of the Oriole compel attention. In the spring of 18S8 a beautiful singer greeted me one summer morning from the top of a tall oak near the house. He paid frequent visits to the same tree-top during the entire season, and sang the same song, beginning and ending with the same tones : Still, like other birds, he had his variations : These were all June songs, the last two being sung late in the afternoon. Though the singer’s home was in the near woods, we did not discover the nest of his mate. There came a time of silence, and an absence of flaming plumage, and finally a family of Tanagers —undoubtedly ours — male and female and three unfinished young Tanagers of a neutral, olive tint, were about our grounds in the last days of August, evidently preparing to leave for their home in the tropics. The husband and father had doffed both his ‘singing-robe’ and his garment of scarlet, and wore in silence a traveling-dress of mixed pea-green and willow-yellow. More desirous than ever to avoid notice, there was about him a most captivating air of quietness and modesty. Jan, 1881, p, 3 C- 37 ■ 27 oV et-h^-J^Y pz. /v < < 'CZIZC^-^’ i£~-\ H-t-^C^JX (sl^ZZi. j) >iZ-Lw<_e£ £~ ' / / 's' f eL. hj^A,^ ^^-jeJL~ /s^S- ~cP*y La~\^sIa. CC * j ^ C ^ ^ ^t- ' ^ J y / "* isd^s. olSPL*^ ( a . a , a U^x/ f ''' ‘ f ' ' ^^Y f * < ^ 2ZHX ZSZi^/ laA*w^ ~Z2d. Iaj- 4-7~ h^eL*l. \j-^ZZaL 6tzz y-A^y v-^-at^ ^-y^ro-izCl '.., ’S' I tal limb of tall savin tree. Collected by “J. M. W. ” (Mr. C. L. Rawson). Pour eggs, fresh. Light greenish blue, thickly spotted and speckled, especially at the larger ends, with purplish gray and chestnut : ,87 x .62 ; .88 x .62 ; .87 x .62 ; .87 x .64. Set IV. June 14, 1887. Black Hawk County, Iowa. Nest on horizontal branch of tree. Three eggs, fresh. Light greenish blue, speckled witli purplish gray and chestnut. The markings are heavier at the larger ends : .81 x .64 ; ,84x,64 ; ,86x.64. Set V. June 17, 1875. Norwich, Conn. Nest on end of oak limb, on edge of wood. Collected by “ J. M. W." (Mr. C. L. Rawson). Three eggs, fresh. Light greenish blue, 1 speckled and spotted with purplish gray and chestnut : .89 x .68 ; .89 x .67 ; .88 x .68. Set VI. May 23, 1887. Black Hawk County, Iowa. Nest on a side limb of an oak tree, fifteen feet from the ground. Four eggs, fresh. Light greenish blue, speckled and spotted with purplish gray and chestnut. The markings form indistinct wreaths around the larger ends: ,80x,63; .82x.63; .83x.63;' .83 x .63. Set VII. June 15, 1883. Nazareth, Penn. Nest on horizontal limb of an oak tree. Three eggs, fresh. Light greenish blue, spotted with purplish gray and chestnut. The mark- ings are heavier at tire larger ends : .91 x .66 ; .98 x .66 ; .91 x .65. This set contains a Cow bird’s egg. Set VIII. June 17, 1885. Nazareth, Penn. Nest on an oak tree, saddled on a lower branch. Four eggs, fresh. Light greenish blue, spotted and speckled with purplish gray and chestnut. On two of the eggs the markings form in- distinct wreaths, but on the other two they are scattered over the whole surface : .89 x .64 ; .91 x .65 ; .89 x .66 ; .83 x .64. overhanging carriage road, in the heart of the city. A most beautifully marked set. Light greenish blue, sported with chestnut and purplish gray. The markings form wreaths around the larger ends: ,90x.63; .90x.64; .91 x.64. Set XIX. June 20, 1887. Nazareth, Penn. Nest on. linden tree, about thirty feet up. Composed of fine sticks, heavy stems of grass, lined with grass. Two eggs, and two of tiie Cowbird, incubation slight. Light green- ish blue, thickly speckled and spotted with purplish gray and chestnut: .93 x.68; .91 x.68. Set XX. June 15, 1888. Nazareth, Penn. Nest in apple tree about twelve feet up. Made of sticks, lined with grass. Four eggs, fresh, and one of the Cowbird. Light green- ish blue, heavily speckled arid spotted, es- pecially at the larger ends, with chestnut and purplish gray: .85x.61; .84x.63; .84x.64; .88X.63. Set XXI. June 11, 1887. Nazareth, Penn. Nest on hickory, about twenty-five feet up. Composed of fine sticks, weeds and wild cotton. Three eggs, fresh, and one of the Cowbird’s. Light greenish blue, thickly speckled and spotted, more heavily at the larger ends, with purplish gray and chestnut : .93 x .65 ; .90 x.64; .89 x.68. Set XXII. June 11, 1888. Nazareth, Penn. Nest on apple tree about nine feet up. Made of weeds and straw. Four eggs, and two of the Cowbird, incubation far advanced. Light greenish Dlue, clouded at the larger ends with purplish gray, and over this there are .wreaths of chestnut. The whole effect is beautiful and very odd : ,95x.67 ; .96x .66 ; .97 x.67 ; .89 x .67. J.P.N. Set IX. June 7, 1885. Black Hawk County, Iowa. Nest on horizontal branch of oak tree, fifteen feet from the ground. Four eggs, fresh. Light greenish blue, heavily spotted with purplish gray and chestnut. The 0.& O.Vol.l7,Feb.l892 p. 21-22 2T I ■ I f # Series of Eggs of Tanager. the Scarlet The eggs of the Scarlet Tanager ( Piranga erythromelax) are usually three or four in number, although two are sometimes all that JOLOGrIST [Vol. 17— No. 2 are laid. Set I. .Tune 18, 1888. Nazareth, Penn. Nest in white oak tree, about twenty-five feet up. Composed of sticks and weeds. Two eggs, incubation advanced. Light greenish blue, spotted, much more heavily at the larger ends, with purplish gray and chestnut : k .97x.67 ; ,95x.66. This set contains a Cow- bird’s egg. Set II. June 12, 1886. Montgomery County, Penn. Nest in an ironwood tree, over a road, twenty feet from ground. Made of twigs and root fibres. Two eggs, incubation commenced. Light greenish blue, thickly speckled and spotted with purplish brown and chestnut: .88x.65; .88 x.64. Set III. June 14, 1888. Preston, Conn. Small flimsey nest on tip end of long horizon- tal limb of tall savin tree. Collected by “J. M. W. ” (Mr. C. L. Rawson). Four eggs, fresh. Light greenish blue, thickly spotted and speckled, especially at the larger ends, with purplish gray and chestnut: ,87x.62; .88 x .62 ; .87 x .62 ; .87 x .64. Set IV. June 14, 1887. Black Hawk County, Iowa. Nest on horizontal branch of tree. Three eggs, fresh. Light greenish blue, speckled witli purplish gray and chestnut. The markings are heavier at the larger ends : . Six. 64 ; ,84x.64 ; ,86x.64. Set V. June 17, 1875. Norwich, Conn. Nest on end of oak limb, on edge of wood. Collected by “ J. M. W.” (Mr. C. L. Rawson). Three eggs, fresh. Light greenish blue, speckled and spotted with purplish gray and chestnut : .89 x .68 ; .89 x .67 ; .88 x .68. Set VI. May 23, 1887. Black Hawk County, Iowa. Nest on a side limb of an oak tree, fifteen feet from the ground. Four eggs, fresh. Light greenish blue, speckled and spotted with purplish gray and chestnut. The markings form indistinct wreaths around the larger ends: ,80x.63; .82x.63; ,83x.63; .83 x .63. Set VII. June 15, 1883. Nazareth, Penn. Nest on horizontal limb of an oak tree. Three eggs, fresh. Light greenish blue, spotted with purplish gray and chestnut. The mark- ings are heavier at the larger ends : .91x.66 ; .98 x .66 ; .91 x .65. This set contains a Cow bird’s egg. Set VIII. June 17, 1885. Nazareth, Penn. Nest on an oak tree, saddled on a lower branch. Four eggs, fresh. Light greenish blue, spotted and speckled witli purplish gray and chestnut. On two of the eggs the markings form in- distinct wreaths, but on the other two they are scattered over the whole surface : .89x.64 ; .91 x .65 ; .89 x .66 ; .83 x .64. Set IX. June 7, 1885. Black Hawk County, Iowa. Nest on horizontal branch of oak tree, fifteen feet from the ground. Four eggs, fresh. Light greenish blue, heavily spotted witli purplish gray and chestnut. The , Rawson). Nest in savin tree in open woods, j Slight, but well constructed. Four eggs, fresh. Light greenish blue, speckled and spotted , with purplish gray and chestnut: ,85x.64; 1 ,83x.64; ,81x.65; .83x.64. j Set XVII. June 12, 1886. Chester County, Penn. Nest on limb of beech tree, twenty | feet from the ground. Made of twigs, etc. Four eggs, incubation advanced. Light greenish blue, speckled aud spotted, more heavily at the larger ends, with purplish gray and chestnut: ,94x.67; .96x.67; .92x.64; .96x.67. Set XVIII. May 31, 1885. Norwich, Conn. Collected by “ J. M. W.” (Mr. C. L. Rawson). Nest on tip end of long limb of apple tree overhanging carriage road, in the heart of the city. A most beautifully marked set. Light greenish blue, sported with chestnut and purplish gray. The markings form wreaths around the larger ends: .90x.63; .90x.64; .91 x.64. Set XIX. June 20, 1887. Nazareth, Penn. Nest on linden tree, about thirty feet up. Composed of fine sticks, heavy stems of grass, lined with grass. Two eggs, and two of the Cowbird, incubation slight. Light green- ish blue, thickly speckled and spotted with purplish gray and chestnut: .93x.68; .91 x .68. Set XX. June 15, 1888. Nazareth, Penn. Nest in apple tree about twelve feet up. Made of sticks, lined with grass. Four eggs, fresh, and one of the Cowbird. Light green- ish blue, heavily speckled and spotted, es- pecially at the larger ends, with chestnut and purplish gray : ,85x.61 ; .84x.63 ; .84 x.64 ; .88 x .63. Set XXI. June 11, 1887. Nazareth, Penn. Nest on hickory, about twenty-five feet up. Composed of fine sticks, weeds and wild cotton. Three eggs, fresh, and one of the Cowbird’ s. Light greenish blue, thickly speckled and spotted, more, heavily at the larger ends, with purplish gray and chestnut- : ,93x.65; .90x.64; ,89x.68. Set XXII. June 11, 1888. Nazareth, Penn. Nest on apple tree about nine feet up. Made of weeds and straw. Four eggs, and two of the Cowbird, incubation far advanced. Light I greenish blue, clouded at the larger ends with purplish- gray, and over this there are .wreaths of chestnut. The whole effect is beautiful and very odd : ,95x,67 ; ,96x.66 ; ,97x.67 ; .89 x .67. J.P.N. O.& O. Vol. 17, Feb. 1892 p. 21-22 2T Peculiar Traits of Some Scarlet Tanagers. — Scarlet Tanagers ( Piranga erythromelas) are not common in this vicinity (Ridgewood, N. J.) ; for many years I saw only two or three during spring migrations. Within the last few years a few pairs have bred in this locality, generally on the outskirts of woods ; so I was surprised to see a pair nesting in a Norway spruce, on a branch only about ten feet from the corner of my house, and about the same distance from the ground. In all my ornithological experience I never knew a pair of birds to live and nest so near my house with such secretiveness. One of my family first saw the birds from an upper window that looked down on the nest. The nest building appeared to be all done by the female. The male bird was seen usually in the morning, apparently inspecting the work or noting its progress, but was seldom seen during the rest of the day. Both birds when approaching their nest alighted near the top of this high tree and descended through the branches to the nest, which was flat, very evenly built, like a cup of basket work, beautifully woven of material resembling the color of the bark of the couia see tne nest ana no mother appeared. 1 thought some harm must have happened to her, but next morning she was at home. My business did not allow me to watch them much during the day; one afternoon the bright male Tanager put in an appearance in the upper part of the tree, but seeing me he made off without coming near the nest. Soon the downy backs of the nestlings showed above the rim of the basket house, when the hen seldom brooded them unless it was wet weather. These youngsters were perfectly quiet, never clamoring for food, like so many other nestlings. Before they were big enough to project conspicuously above their flat nest they left it and went higher up the tree. This was on the 3d of July. Their color being greenish, it was very hard to distinguish them in the upper branches where they were secreted and fed by the parents. A few days before leaving the nest a violent tempest passed over the vicinity; trees were thrown down and scattered over the ground in all directions; many nests of different birds were tossed or knocked out of the trees by wind or hailstones. I thought it impossible for my Tanagers to escape harm, but they were all right after the storm, which showed how the faithful mother must have covered them. The young birds and mother remained about for several weeks, but the male was absent, if his scarlet was still worn. I took down the deserted nest. It was composed of long fine brown rootlets, fine thin stems of running blackberry, with a little grass and string evenly woven ; it was thinly lined with a fine yellowish brown, thread-like fibre, as fine as horsehair. The whole structure can be seen through yet it is strong. . Had I expressed an opinion on the habits of the Scarlet Tanager from that year’s observation I should have said the male bird was very shy, 60. Increase of Some Species in Certain Localities. By Fred J. Davis. Ibid., V, p. 5. July, 1879.— Scarlet Tanager, Crow Blackbird, Great-crested Flycatcher, Green Heron, and Pine Grosbeak referred to ; locality (appar- ently) Central New York. OOlOfifillfc 277. Scarlet Tanager. [By Dr. H. A. Atkins.] Ibid., VI, p. 13. — 9 ,aad Q» Dates, of arrival , of Pyranga rubra at Locke, Ingham Co., Mich., for 25 years. By E. E. F[ish]. Ibid., No. 5 317. Remarkable Flight of Birds. By M. Chamberlain. Ibid., VI, Q,fM& Qf> p. S3-— ScaHe-t aiaiiagers, Indigo Birds, and Green Herons, at Westport, Nova Scotia , “driven in by a g ale.” 317. Remarkable Flight of Birds. By M. Chamberlain. Ibid., VI, Q» p . 53.— Scarlet Talragers, Indigo Birds, and Green Herons, at Westport, Nova Scotia, “driven in by a gale.” tree. Taken with the greenish color of the female, it was a remarkable instance of color illusion ; every time I wanted to see the nest, knowing the branch it was on, I had to run my eye along the branch till it met the nest before I could see it; the shallow nest and the greenish female were remarkably inconspicuous. Only the female took part in the duties of incubation. She would remain on the nest even when one passed closely, but if anyone stopped to look at her, she would glide off the nest through the tree in the opposite direction, so quietly as to almost make one doubtful of her presence. The birds became quite accustomed to seeing one of my family sitting at the window close by. I did not go very near the nest for fear of disturbing the birds. When the young were hatched another peculiarity was noticed, these birds differing much from most birds in the manner of feeding their young. I watched several evenings for an hour or more at a distance from the tree, but could clearly see the nest with ‘my field glass. Still I did not once see the female feed her young. Most birds feed their young often just before sunset, and I think the female Tanager must have known she was watched, for one evening I watched as long as I could see the nest and no mother appeared. I thought some harm must have happened to her, but next morning she was at home. My business did not allow me to watch them much during the day; one afternoon the bright male Tanager put in an appearance in the upper part of the tree, but seeing me he made off without coming near the nest. Soon the downy backs of the nestlings showed above the rim of the basket house, when the hen seldom brooded them unless it was wet weather. These youngsters were perfectly quiet, never clamoring for food, like so many other nestlings. Before they were big enough to project conspicuously above their flat nest they left it and went higher up the tree. This was on the 3d of July. Their color being greenish, it was very hard to distinguish them in the upper branches where they were secreted and fed by the parents. A few days before leaving the nest a violent tempest passed over the vicinity; trees were thrown down and scattered over the ground in all directions; many nests of different birds were tossed or knocked out of the trees by wind or hailstones. I thought it impossible for my Tanagers to escape harm, but they were ail right after the storm, which showed how the faithful mother must have covered them. The young birds and mother remained about for several weeks, but the male was absent, if his scarlet was still worn. I took down the deserted nest. It was composed of long fine brown rootlets, fine thin stems of running blackberry, with a little grass and string evenly woven ; it was thinly lined with a fine yellowish brown, thread-like fibre, as fine as horsehair. The whole structure can be seen through yet it is strong. Had I expressed an opinion on the habits of the Scarlet Tanager from that year’s observation I should have said the male bird was very shy, 60. Increase of Some Sfecies in Certain Localities. By Fred J. Davis. Ibid., V, p. 5. July, 1879. — Scarlet Tanager, Crow Blackbird, Great-crested Flycatcher, Green Heron, and Pine Grosbeak referred to; locality (appar- ently) Central New York. OQlOStQb 277. Scarlet Tanager. [By Dr. II. A. Atkins.] Ibid., VI, p. 13. — ; J Oft Dates, of arrival of Pyranga rubra at Locke, Ingham Co., Mich., for 25 _years. 606. Habits of the Scarlet Tanager. By E. E. F[ish]. Ibid., No. 5, PP . 1 18-1 19. otiU, Buf. Nat. FteW Cfab, 1883 Q, Q* Q,W& O* 3x7. Remarkable Flight of Birds. By M. Chamberlain. Ibid., VI, p. 33. — Sea-de:).. Uju! age rs . Indigo Birds, and Green Herons, at Westport, Nova Scotia, “ driven in by a gale.” 317. Remarkable Flight of Birds. By M. Chamberlain. Ibid., VI, p 53.— Starlet Taiiagers, Indigo Birds, and Green Herons, at Westport, Nova Scotia, “driven in by a gale.” 1 -iwlZ fist. A — VGl- ( t ^/ bi^sf tfz^JC 4^7 u ^ ^ P~ ^ . U**, Lie. ^ -TS—M /r w ' 4 '~~ /6c ~'" ^ /w. — *a. Ga /' J2 nn j J L\ Ox- ),/( /)<* ( \SL * "p ^ j ^ ^ U t-v v. 'j '-- ^ ' /y?o i-j O/va A /l ^T A . ‘/^C\- ‘l^-tr. -. ^ •l^u.-t^i. Of U^aA f X '~ OVv '-‘* ( tQ^A^A^KKy^^ V^s^S? w. (fiM/ 7 h~ ¥ - m °- ’ 71 ^ "~“/ > e^ty - A ^jr r v u^'ejc. ^ Piranga rubra in Massachusetts. — On May 12, 1901, while walking in Newton, I heard the call of the Summer Tanager and on going in pursuit soon came up with the bird. It was not in red plumage, but from a cer- tain streaky, splashy, unsettled appearance, the orange-red being very bright in spots, I took it for an immature male. This, however, is a mat- ter of very inexpert opinion. As to the identity of the bird as Piranga rubra , there could be no do'ubt. I had it under my glass (an eight-power Zeiss) for some time at short range, under the most favorable conditions ; and while thus under observation it uttered again and again its very peculiar and thoroughly characteristic polysyllabic signal, with which I am fairly familiar from having heard it often at the South. According to Messrs Ilowe and Allen’s ‘Birds of Massachusetts’ this may count as the sixth Massachusetts record. — Bradford Torrey, Wellesley Hills, Mass. Auk, XVIII, July., 1901, p. *7 3- Some Birds of Bare or Accidental Oc- ourrence in New England. H- A. Purdie (>. Pyranga asstiva. Summer Reddird. — Mr. Jencks informs me that a male was shot a few years since on Ten-Mile River, six or eight miles northeast of Providence. It has appeared before, but is sufficiently rare here to merit notice. BuU. N.O.O. 2, Jan., 1877. p.21 c lAvtsudAcatr ^^CyfrLcla. )'yLas&d _ Piranga rubra rubra ( Linne ). Summer Tanager. — A male taken at Deer Island, Boston harbor, Mass., April 11, 1916. The plumage and general condition of this specimen led us to believe that this bird had not been in captivity. It was taken on the window-ledge of a pumping station. BURE AU O F NATURAL HISTORY.' p c V^<\. a c< ^ ^ i ^toTblished 1 Telephone Connection J. W. CRITCHLEJORS Successor to southwtck & c/Si jSfe?““ ww * (}&&&* DEALER IN .j -J JUI>* ■“**** Mammal and Bird Skin^'^affc^^Shells, Fur Ri ugs. NATURALISTS’ SUPPLIES AND PUBLICATIONS. Animals and Birds Mounted to Order either from Fresh Specimens or Dry Skins. 354 WESTMINSTER STREET. OsP.; JZ/O? SUCCESSORS w. A. Augell. H. A. Cash. / srp O' - / // / // K £ <£^2- 3H bureau of natural history^ ESTABLISHED 1876 Telephone Connection J. M. CRITCH s yi&&ORS SUCCESSOR TO SOUTH WICK & CRITCHLEY. 0 . A. ****- Mammal and Bird Skins; Fancy Shells, Fur Rugs, NATURALISTS’ SUPPLIES AND PUBLICATIONS. Animals and Birds Mounted to Order either from Fresh Specimens or Dry Skins. 354 WESTMINSTER STREET. 'f° SUCCESSORS W . A. Augell. H. A. Cash. 77 J: - Bofitrn Soc. Nat. History, Piranga rubra. Summer Tanager. — A male, said to have been shot at Seaconnet, R. I„ on April 27, 1901, was purchased of Messrs. Angell and Cash. There seems to be no reason to discredit the record.— Glover M. Allen, Cambridge, Mass. 4Hjt 25 , JLpr-1008 ,p. ral Notes. The Summer Tanager in Connecticut. — An adult male Piranga rubra was taken here April 28, 1893. The weather was quite cold at the time. Although in rather poor flesh, the bird shows no signs of ever having been caged. — Jno. H. Sage, Portland , Conn. Ault July, 189G 303. Auk J£II, July, 1895i Summer Redbird at Saytfnjtofc,’ Conn. — I have recently added another unexpected acquisition to my list of things new in a fine male specimen of the Summer Redbird ( Piranga rubra) which I secured here in Old Say- brook on the 27th of April last (1895). It seemed to be perfectly con- tented, as if ignorant that it had wandered off, and whistled as cheeiily in the cold rain storm then prevailing as if it was still under sunny skies. This is the first of its species that I have ever seen here.— J. N. Clark, Saybrook , Conn. 3 b Capture of the Summer Red Bird on Long Island. — On May 16, 1883, my cousin, a boy of about fourteen, brought me a couple of bird£ which he had shot in this place. I found them to be very much mutilated and hardly fit to be mounted, but I took the skin of one, as it was new to me, and laid it away. On examining Audubon’s ‘North American Birds’ lately, I saw that the skin I had was that of the male Summer Red Bird. I believe that the other bird, which I threw away at the time, it being too much mutilated to do anything with, was a female of the same species. It was only a few days ago that I learned that this bird is quite rare in this section, and so communicate the particulars. The skin was also iden- tified by Dr. A. K. Fisher. The boy who shot the two birds above men- tioned told me at the time that he had seen others of the same kind, but could not shoot them. — W. F. Hendrickson, Long Island , N. T. Auk, I, July, 1884. p. X. *10 f t Long Island Bird Notes. Wm.Dutcher 21. Piranga rubra. Summer Tanager. — While at Sag Harbor recently I found among some mounted birds in the shop of Lucas & Buck, an adult specimen of this species which was shot some time in May, 1885, near the village of Bridghampton. Mr. Ivan C. Byrarn, of Sag Harbor, wrote me that on April 7, 1886, a friend shot a strange bird. It was unfortunately eaten by a cat, which did not know its value as a specimen. From the description given of the bird I have no doubt but that it was correctly identified by Mr. Byram as a Summer Tanager. Mr. Albert Lott, of Merrick, Queens Co., sent one to rne tor identification. He wrote that it was shot by a neighbor, May 14, rS86. At the time it was killed it was near his hives catching the bees. It did not eat any portion of them except the head. It had been about the place for three or four days. Auk, 3, Oct., 1886. p. , Bird Notes from Long Island, N. Y. William Dutoher. 21. Piranga rubra. Summer Tanager. — Mr. Giraud does not include this species among the Long Island birds, nor does Mr. George N. Law- rence include it in his catalogue. If The former says, when speaking of the Scarlet Tanager (. Piranga ery- thr omelets) : “This species is the only one of the Genus that is found in this vicinity.** The latter states, “ I have seen it in the Magnolia Swamps of the New Jersey coast near Atlantic City, but never met with it any further north.” Since my previous records* I have had two additional specimens reported to me by Mr. John C. Knoess, who writes : “I have a beautiful specimen, killed last April (1886) at Manor, Suffolk Co., and another at Promised Land, also in Suffolk Co. They are the first I ever saw on the Island.” Can it be that this species is extending its range northward ? Auk, V, April, 1888. p.181 ~ . IT Catalogue of Birds observed on New York, Long, and Staten Islands, and the ad- jacent parts of New Jersey. Ann. N. Y. Lyc. Nat. Hist., VIII, p. 286, April, 1886. ** Birds of Long Island, p. 136. * Auk, Vol. Ill, 1886, p. 442. [52.1.] Piranga rubra (Linn.). Summer Tanager. — I took a female in perfect plumage, at Highland Falls, New York, May 12, 1883. Meas- urements (No. 2583, E. A. M.) : length, 7.00; alar expanse, 11.40; wing, 3.60; tail, 2.80; culmen, .60; gape, .77; tarsus, 74; middle toe and claw, .75; claw alone, .22 inch. Irides hazel. Bill greenish olive. Legs and feet bluish gray ; claws brownish. Mearns, Auk, Vll. Jan. 1890 . p. > £~ 3, ?? General Notes, A Hybrid Tanager. — While in Omaha last fall for a few hours I called on Mr. Leonard Skow who called my attention to a Tanager in his collec- tion that did not fit the keys. On my return to Washington I arranged to have the bird sent on for examination, and Mr. Ridgway pronounces it an unmistakable case of hybridism between Pyra?iga rubra and P erythromelas — 'the first known instance of this phenomenon in the genus. The bird is a male. Its bill is rather thicker than in P. erythromelas , but not so long as in P. rubra , with the median notch of the upper man- dible well developed. The wings are rusty black, the primaries are edged with red on the outer web, while the secondaries and coverts are washed with brick red, giving the whole wing the appearance of having been brushed over with a water color of reddish yellow. The tail is marked in the same manner, but with more of the appearance of having been dipped in the red stain, as the whole web of each feather is tinged more deeply on the outer than on the inner weh and at the base than at the tip. The body has the scarlet color of P. erythromelas , with no trace of the Ver- million of P. rubra , though there is a little of the bronze of immaturity on the nape of the neck and on the belly. In a series of about thirty specimens of P. erythromelas there is no trace of the reddish wash on the black — though several show red feathers among the black coverts. The characters of P. erythromelas are the stronger on the whole, as might be expected, as it seems the hardier bird of the two. Measuiements show that it is intermediate in size between the two species. I give a few (in inches), with those of Ridgway’s ‘Manual’ for comparison. Wing Tail 2.85 2.80- 3.15 (2.99) 2.80- 3.25 Culmen .60 .82-.90 (.86) ■55--6o Hybrid P. rubra P. erythromelas 3-90 3-S5-3-9S (3 69 ) 3-55-3-9° The specimen is nowin the collection of the U. S. National Museum — L. M. McCormick, Washington, D. C. Auk X, July, 1893 p. 302-303. Plumasre of some birds from upper SaCfalfoI'na - Lsverefct M. Loomis. Piranga rubra. — The following description is of a female, with ovary of a breeding bird, taken June 2, 1879. Prevailing color above brownish gray, with touches of olive-yellowish ; under surface cream-color, washed with Naples yellow, with a patch of chrome yellow on breast. Three males and a female of subspecies cooperi in the American Museum resemble this {specimen in their faded appearance. Auk X, April, 1893. p.154. First Plumage of the Summer Tanager ( Piranga rubra'',. — Under- parts whitish-buff, heavily streaked on breast with dusky; throat and abdo- men with lighter and more linear streaks of the same. Under tail-coverts reddish-buff with dark streaks. Head and upper parts dark brownish buff thickly spotted and streaked with dusky. Wings showing traces of dull red and green on primaries and secondaries. The first and second wing- coverts tipped and edged with buff, forming two distinct wing-bars. The bird (No. 2084, $ , Coll. C. W. Beckham), from which the above de- scription is taken, was shot at Bardstown, Kentucky, on June 21, and was attended by both parents. The call-note of the young Tanager is very different from any note of the adult birds. It is very full and sonorous and faintly suggestive of the Bluebird’s ordinary whistle. — Charles Wickliff Becki-iam, Bardstown, Ky. J Attk, 3, Oct., 1880. p. y£7' Young Oologist. 1541* Summer Red-bird. By T. D. Perry. Ibid., p. 1 17- -A.uk, Vll. Ja.n.l 8 £> 0 . p. $r* 2 . A Female Piranga rubra Assuming the Plumage of the Male. On the 27th of Maj of the present year my son Percy W. Shufeldt collected at Takoma Park, in Montgomery County, Maryland, a female Summer Tanager having a plumage so unusual that a record of it would seem worthy of presentation. The species is by no means uncommon in the locality where it was taken, and the specimen is apparently an adult, of sev- eral years of age. In coloration her plumage about corresponds with that of a young male of this species during the first summer, or an adult female with the following differences the plumage of the upper parts is thickly interspersed with the dark red feathers which characterize the male, and the plumage of the entire under parts is thickly beset with bright ver- million-tinted feathers. Many of the secondaries of the wings are also bright red, as is also the outer tail-feather of the left side. I personally examined the sex of this specimen on dissection, and found her ovary to contain ova varying in size from a No. 10 shot to that of a small pea. The skin of this bird is at present in my son’s collection. Dr. R. W Shufeldt , Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C. Auk, 8, July ,1891. P- 3/s ~ 3/4- Auk, XIV, Oct., 1897, P jp.^e-7- Notes on the Moult and certain Plumage Phases of Piranga rubra. — In ‘The Auk’ for July, 1891 (pp. 315, 316) I described an instance wherein the Summer Tanager (P. rubra), a female, had assumed the plumage of the male. That specimen was collected by my son, Percy Shufeldt, and has since been added to the collections of the U. S. National Museum. Since that date the same collector has added to his private series, thirteen more specimens of this species, and as some of these exhibit certain nota- ble conditions of the moult and plumage, it is my intention here to pass a few remarks upon the more interesting of these. Twelve of the skins are from male birds, while the thirteenth is from an adult female, taken in August, 1895, and exhibits the autumnal plumage nearly completed. All these individuals were collected either in the northeastern part of the District of Columbia, or in the adjacent parts of southern Maryland. Of the seven red males in the series taken at random from April 18, 1896, to July 15, only one of them shows the full and completed plumage, and that the one shot on the first-mentioned date. All of the others present more or less green in the wings and tail, and one with a greenish patch on the throat. A specimen, an old male, shot on the 15th of July, 1896, has both the plumage of the entire body and tail red, while the secondaries and primaries of the wings are -in the process of the moult, — the new feathers likewise coming in red , — the same applying to the wing-coverts. This tends to prove, in so far at least as this particular specimen is con- cerned, that in the male of this species in the autumnal moult they reassume the red plumage. Another specimen, which I take to be a young male of the first spring, and shot on May 14, 1897, has the body plumage red, with red and green wings, but the tail exactly half red and half green, — the green feathers or the left half of the tail being half a centimeter shorter than the red ones. All these feathers are new, with the exception of one of the green ones, and it is found next to the outermost one of that side. Now the first plumage taken on by both sexes of this species after leaving the nest is the olive-green plumage corresponding to that of the normal adult females, and in that plumage the birds of the year migrate south in the autumn. So that the aforesaid specimen shot on May 14, possibly met with an accident, losing all the feathers of the left side of the tail with the exception of the one mentioned, and these being replaced came in green. This seems to be the only explanation to account for the state of affairs seen in this individual. In another specimen of this series, a young male of the first autumn in the full green plumage, shows a broadish transverse red bar across the green and perfected feathers of the tail. Perhaps the most interesting specimen in the collection is that of a female (adult) which in the spring had, in part, the red plumage of the male, and when collected on the 2d of August, 1897, was in full moult, — the red feathers of the entire plumage being replaced by the green ones of the adult female bird with normal coloration. This particular example then, would tend to show that when the females of this species assume in the spring the red plumage of the males, that in the autumnal moult they pass back again to the plumage of the normally-colored females, — whereas the old males reassume the red plumage. — R. W. Shufeldt, Smithsonian Institution, Washington , D. C. BMl «f •haaterOc.S.C, L.M. Loom- is. - A«fe*risk marks those urv^aiua *48. Pyranga sestiva. Summer Redbird; “ Redbird.’ — Summer; abundant. Although a woodland bird, the Summer Tanager is by no means strictly confined to the timber, but, on the contrary, is found in the groves and shade-trees of the town, and around the planters houses in the open country, and is everywhere an incessant songster. Dur- ing spring the woods are filled, at all hours of the day, with the fervid melody of this tireless vocalist. [*] [* A nest of the Summer Redbird, containing three eggs (its usual comple- ment), has been sent to me by Mr. Loomis, with its female parent. It was found on a public thoroughfare, in the edge of a grove, and built in a small black-jack oak, near the extremity of an inclining limb, five feet from the trunk and eight and one half above the ground. It is saddled on the limb, partially resting on the smaller branchlets, and is nearly homogeneous in struc- ture, being a beautifully interwoven fabric of stems of grasses, the larger ones making the external framework, the finer ones enclosing the deep cup-like cavity, which is wider below than at the rim. The height of the nest is about 2 inches , the depth of the cavity, being 1.90, shows how thin is the floor. The external diameter of the cavity at the rim is 2.80, and half an inch below, 3 inches ; that of the whole nest varies from 5 to 5.75 inches. The eggs measure .89 X.71 ; .92X.70 ; .90X.66. Their ground-color is a light shade of emerald green, marked with various shades of brown, more or less tinged with lilac, purple, and slate. These are well scattered over the egg, though larger and more numerous about the larger end. — T. M. B.] B*U. N.O.C. 4, Oct., 1*70. p.913 s ' d r -> 4 VIC ) jA ri; i ;Tw- Eggs in Sat- O.S.Brimley I Summer Tanager. Set three to four, my ^ ^observations fail to determine anything further I s ? o far. 13 , Oct.1890. p.140 SJ©s Eggs in O.S.Brimley Summer Tanager. Standard set most prob- ably three in this locality. Qa XVSi Jsiis 1821* P ' S Nesting of the Summer Tanager at Raleigh, N. C. The Summer Tanager (Pirantja rubra ) is by no means uncommon at Raleigh during the summer months, inhabiting both mixed woods and pines, being perhaps more common in the latter. About the middle of May the Tanager looks out for a nest site, usually selecting one of the long lower limbs of an oak or pine, and on this limb, toward the end away from the trunk, the nest is placed. Sometimes, however, the Tanager prefers to place her nest in the very top of a small pine sapling instead of towards the end of a long limb. In botli cases a compar- atively open place in the woods seems to be preferred to a more retired one, the nest being often in a tree close to a road or over a foot path . The height of the nest varies from six to thirty feet, usually about fifteen. The nest is composed of weed stems exter- nally, and is lined with fine, yellow cured grass stems; the lining forming a strong contrast in color to the bulk of the nest. The nest is rather flat and shallow, but firm and compact, and the form of the sitting bird shows very prominently when on the nest. The eggs are three or four in this locality, the date for fresh sets being June 1st and later, and, as is j usually the case, when one nest is taken the bird builds a fresh nest and lays another set. C. S. Brimley. Raleigh, X. 0. O.&O, 15. Nov, 1890, p,l<34 vz General Notes. j Behavior of a Summer Tanager. — I send the following item which my friend, Rev. Boniface Verheyen, of St. Benedict’s College, Atchison, Kansas, communicated to me a short time ago. “. . . I want to tell you about the peculiar conduct of a Summer Tanager ( Piranga rubra ) which a number of the professors witnessed daily for several weeks. It was during the last week of May that the bird first began to attract attention. He would be seen to fly from window to win- dow on the north side of the west wing of the College, or perch on the sill, facing inward, as if peering through the window. Every few moments he would make an attack on the pane with his bill, as if he were trying to get at something or force his way through. When driven from one window he would fly to another. His attacks were at times quite vicious : he would fly from a neighboring tree directly for the window and strike the pane with a whack. Time and again he attracted my attention in my room, though the door was shut. Several times I took my stand directly in front of the closed window within a few feet of him and watched him closely at his seeming mad effort to peck holes through the pane. He did not seem to care much whether I stood there or not. I opened one of the windows on several occasions to see if he would come in, but he did household.” So far my correspondent. I might add that during my sojourn at the college, a Summer Tanager was a constant visitor to the grove on the College Campus, and nested there for a number of years Here is another little item in connection with bird lore that may be of interest. On one of my visits to the college, three years ago, I was informed that a certain bird had often been seen in the students’ chapel. As the chapel is skirted on two sides by trees, and the windows are usually open during the summer, it is not a rare occurrence to find a stray bird fluttering about on the inside. But here was said to be a case of a frequent visitor to the sacred enclosure — a bird with a religious turn of mind, so to speak. I examinied into the matter, and, sure enough, there was my bird, a female Yellow-billed Cuckoo ( Coccyzus americanus ) . She was not flying about, but stood on the floor, on which she had laid an egg, and to all appearances was standing guard over it. I secured the egg, which is now preserved in the college museutn. — PirmineJVI. Kodmly, Seneca , Kansas. Auk X Oct , 18^3 p_ 367-68 Piranga rubra and Carpodacus mexicanus frontalis Preoccupied? — The change of Dendroica ceerulea to Dendroica rara (Ridgway, Auk, Jan., 1897, XIV, 97), which was promptly accepted by the A. O. U. Com- mittee, involves an interpretation of Canon XXXIII of the A. O. U. Code of Nomenclature to which little if any attention seems to have been called. It appears advisable at the present time to raise this question, inasmuch as it affects the validity of some other current names ; and this the more as in regard to it there seems to be neither unanimity of opinion nor uniformity of practice. Briefly stated, it is this : in considering the tenability of specific names, so far as preoccupation is concerned, shall any account be taken of homomyms which are mere combinations, e., not original descriptions? To illustrate: Motacilla ceerulea of Linnteus, 1766, was called Sylvia ceerulea by Latham in 1790, — evidently a simple transfer of Linnreus’s species to another genus. Now, does this Sylvia ceerulea of Latham, 1790, preclude the use of Sylvia ceerulea Wilson, 1810, for another and widely different species, the former being now a Poliop- lila, the latter a Dendroica ? Canon XXXIII is apparently quite explicit upon this point, its text being as follows: “ a specific or subspecific name is to be changed when it has been applied to some other species of the same genus, or used previously in combination with the same generic name.” The phrase, “ or used previously in combination with the same generic name,” seems to leave no doubt of its meaning; and a strictly literal interpretation of this clause will treat alike, all combinations, whether or not they happen to be those of original descriptions. Such being the case, there are two names in our North American List which must be changed. The first of t^iese, Piranga rubra, for the Sum- mer Tanager, is untenable because Piranga rubra was previously used by Vieillot, as well as by many succeeding authors, for the species now known as Piranga erythromelas. The rejection of Piranga rubra for the Summer Tanager permits its employment for the Scarlet Tanager ; the former then becoming Piranga eestiva. This is rather a fortunate cir- cumstance, for these two birds will thus bear the names so long in use before the publication of the first edition of the A. O. U. Check-List. The specific term of Carpodacus mexicanus frontalis ( Fringilla. front- alis Say, Long’s Exped. to Rocky Mts., 1824, II, 40) must give way on account of Fringilla frontalis Vieillot (Nouv. Diet. d’Hist. Nat. 1817, XII, 181), which is a synonym of Sporopipes frontalis (Daudin). The next available name seems to be Carpodacus obscurus McCall (Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila., June, 1851, 220), and the United States form of the House Finch will consequently become Carpodacus mexicanus ob- scurus. — Harry C. Oberholser, Washington , D. C. Auk, XVI, April, 1899, p p, Piranga rubra not Preoccupied. — Mr. Gerrit S. Miller, Jr., has kindly pointed out an error of statement in regard to the names of Tanagers published by the present writer in the last number of ‘The Auk.’ The remark is there made that Vieillot used the combination Piranga rubra for the Scarlet Tanager, thus precluding its subsequent employment for the Summer Tanager. As a matter of fact, however, Vieillot’s Piranga rubra (Ois. Am. Sept., I, 1807, p. iv, pi. I, fig. 12) is not the Scarlet, but the Summer Tanager, as examination of his references and figure clearly demonstrates. This mistake arose from taking Professor Baird’s identification of Vieillot’s Piranga rubra, — P. R. R. Rep., IX, 1858, p. 300, where he cites it as a synonym of the bird now known as Piranga erythromelas, in which course he has been followed bv some other authors. Further comment is unnecessary; and the two birds in question remain in undisputed possession of their present names. — Harry C. Oberholser, Washington, D. C. Auk, XVI, July, 1899, Pj 9 . 278 -XS/, Eastern Massachusetts. itfrf &*yu/'Ct ' Iroc.f^trty /A fa. - A 1 - £--3° m% i\ & U- &. n (J>~V ift mo iX>-. ?'. fttft ,. aft >4-*' . *(@ - ^ 7s - ^6" *?° 6> d, 6d t A<^ tif/ . avtK~:fa &c ft. t, d &>z td- u. c 4 &t. a 6t. et. /(. ' - - — L f * A 1 .... - Z ’y It*. i inJL- /V.fl ,a.L *) 0 6 ift /ft. n\ xft inj.zKy-. MftiMi/ftfftftiftW- jsmft n Si t id-toy it-m.ift /wo 6i. C*. &- *~i , 6^-j 7 i . 7£ i /K /6'i *'i ?v4-_ /jfM. BJ 1 r\ ft ftomjmftC/ftjft mx/ftm /mo in Gc. £?• 6a. Sj. 6f. S )- yfA- - »w.y. Sj.itm/ ,, . it*, n~ trx At, ii x ft/x s* - - iW' ^ - - M-. ^ 6 - /ftSP tg. 1 L.. ft 6 *. &»- *•- $••*• it*. . ^ «/. £/? 6 , u. A. U &,. xx6> y^t, 7 'zi' pfe /ftW4UA &4. . n /r*eXfn~j.ws. p&t W° 3 & / „ / *J TJ /2 j /) "X& p.m-- /M o 2. V-‘ ) iww '. /xj _ X c K^Zud: ^r* r r £ /7y/ 7— 7 45 J* y'° 7 " 7 "p- 7 " //-./Z{/ 3 {/ ^c. £ 3. &&'U#uP.J fo-iAjxXtA^t { /f, , ^d-Zkaj C.-Ct^L . '7'- .'Ti-r, A-^J yp/e ^ /7 V/) /o ' 4 ^ ^ 7 7 7 ^ /*» 9 ^ / 7 / ^ 4-7 /fajJft/IJft- /f® e - /x~ . 7 '_ m. x t ^ ^7^ . 7/^ />// /iX L ‘3>- 7-° i- 7> 9* /0* //* /3® /S'® Z4,® /7./f-Z/* M® M*: JLS-* /Mz. /£ 9® /o - // *-./* 4 // - /y ^./s-. JL -_ // //>^) /7 7^-7 -_ ^ 7^ t jlh x . Ut L .X7 1 ^ '-****£ IQi £jl. f - 7 f fm/Tft /**■ . i> oL zftftlft !M() ftTftlK 3 7 A// /7 J4 //a ^747® /£>-- 777 ft*. /?- 2oK 29 ~ 4»?u*uJ . /m . /& c ft n I u2^j , cx. — , . tTJ^ 7 ’ ?£%*** ftft // /4j- */-. s i 7 1 ?-- /*-. m~- /7^/y4 3 s - s% -7 ~ t* 1 - /3 't /v 7/t t/7 l _Z6'Uz/i3 J -2?- AW 7777 . fe. m 'IX-JTX/ir/j. /ft/ 7 /■ &X>ttrt_ 'h'l jf. < 2 f. &• M. A. . Qaau, ft/ftyi. /^~../4-^ afe®. 77- Iftjb . , !± 3±ft- M- U%Xft 3o* (Iw /ffgL Oy.vri^j d “ TV ft 7X11* 20'- 2/ -2V <-_ iwW //X/ ‘ /i. ' tt£ Taohvcineta bicolor. Concord, Mass . 1378. Tjp river an immense migration of .H.irun.dP bicolor was Oct .16 passing southward. I shot five specimens. s^uLul. tfLyA--6ok. fvi&sn. ^hy^j /<6~ ytJ> fe~l^A^ 'UsJ C^'LAAC^A. ^ /ls< A /A^ Uj-X^rJxy^ VXZxa A^X Irvvv^ j/Ct^ka On Jy^Ayiy ^jfe / ^ cL(^y C'ofeA. ifH^LL mXC\Xx^ fezXx ^7C fe\..A c^&^r^ZAT' cXC' cX C^-^ASh^ AasX-cX! C^ ^Xy^A. (■ C \A tf-x? Ta 3^/t .y AiJUaAS (L y<~0^\. . JtUsy /rvy dX£~ (/> ^ yA-> ■ &■ Uuvw^^ tAT^v^ *XT C 'A> ^~AJ fe r Ayi*y^£ j .Ce^ fax La/\a~* 1. X\h*X^i\Pv cXZZXuAc oUX ca/MXJ ^ 'tlhfe'O j/txZo yifx-^t^-P) f gxxOfeXy fy t^./L pXXa/x. , /K i Ci> - ?/^- v ^/ / 0 O-U^L-ir 'xa/?' 4 v, ^J--wi^M; — «. X /* -■ ■' t .y/ A i // o^/A.-XXtX\ i w (7^C/v- jxAypT UIhAZ' y^XXyikC^A ^ i X ^fei h^XZti Oxr>y*~ (Ky-^ ^y ^ ^ l^. (j/feXT 0-\ feXXZ Ayj *^- ^ uaV fexyyyy yjj^cy ^V' ^Uia* (\sy\s0uX~ u^/vWVtZ^ i^xAAA^xL ^t%A~ 7 7 V «=n /^VtAA. 7 7 - tXXXXIf cZa_a_/ ^.ubtr^A M r cZ? i’X. Tx^X- A_aa. - c*^y? d-Xx^ A 4 ^ -^yl^A-c cXX AA^_, ^'L-C'2-Y ^va L-^ A AAA ^aTXa 7* A. 7 At-< *7 /A <5.a ■A^ {/ Is'l-y, AX'V vxj^y ^ /' or ^ ,A *rA'1 -AAi^. ^ C^'V j ZX ■uyi-^ *L A 777 t xj JCZ l. ^ ,t7 . -. 79 ^ Z,_ {. Z /A f_^_^- ^ 1 t v ^Zx^c. eZZx^Z dZZstA. ty< C? O-A^. XL L i X aao ,Z t Ofy^i7\. 7jc-\^< c 7 X ^-AX. {jL tAT^ ^Tua- ^CA-A. f /fy^. A cx/XaCX^ ^7277^* <£a 7 y/Y'To'^C^ t Ym, ^TT' _y^ 1A^X- yZ-A^y 6 s\J K^fjLAyC A_ \^\_ o\ ^ dAy . / LsC'-t-^./r ^6^tA- ^ '* ^ #J^j_. ccr~uZ^ J 4 A-'l/S. fi^isiz-yys^iyt LA^ (L^^i^,.., r <^4t4 ^ZxAA fa J 1 ' 1 y • / '*/■- 1 i- Z , £* '~PZ'Cax , / Zca. 4. t^w 44v- 4-U. ^ ~Xh~x rU l/' /IaaAA ov/A- y r — y At-KS^-^ tA LaO* Av^'M --T>-^vJ ~^Xa ^ e '-+J'-A^, I'AcAa tA tA/-ct_^y ?aZo~\^xa*— #- •w'i? 4 Ca*Ai^ Z-f f\A\}~^AAAxyxA/^ ^x/cAx^y ti4& .^T' U ' ZtvbA y ^by Cc^tA 4U /Jxc-^A &*k (A "^xrvv. ^ l/ix-A. e^s/- 4 -«- ,4 ( JcJLj ^ ^ ^ 1 /i “ ^/ ^ i ( ir i 7 17“ ^4^. fl if n, //s~l*'J CUj-Aa\^ / f./l/,, f J-tr-AJA 'L-i — ^ 7 c 1 J Q Z t 1 7T J d / / //.iiA / A/aAcAX>.iai / /_ ,., xaA.^ Ji,/AyzAx - y/ /io> — a o-i y z$ j Cx A ^- / r 4tj— AlA\oJv>-x A C l : , t ~ ^ 1^cA/-A 1 /T^T-l- j ji.&yy&A-i - b / L~ A 0~x 2 6 . X^y ('Y z * , ** ^ v i v^^X.'f . - -jbc/At ?' y i / 5 ^ jZ^ ■ - ^ z <-a_/Z A 4 t 4^.v z>-^7 /4u y ^ucUtd-t A 4zlV ; >z. /, '—T- / ■ 7/ ' ' '^-‘ ” ^ y Tw 4‘ A Q faxjfa*. TV . , /w/ ^Uyj, If S poxdkxi , _ .SSt-i/V-fcvy A cLkaac^~ HlsVt f ^4^CV, w jf*. J 4 y J, ^ ^ d^y tJ* l .&4 V ^ \J Q &*o AaU\. £jjJ/toVOXJ~ fax JZlZ^ Ck^XX^iA-dt i £y ulwvJcy zr oxtzzfa. a- ^Ivv <^r ^ u^au t h* *- *fa+tX~£Xfa f ^yyyy gkjlfa i*j~t>—£jL i»«. “y . <^VVr*-4 >fcc y-V-^Li Qt , t XxLyu^U. ** . > » f tfioiX LoOx W ~Z»" &. A ^ ^Vy Q-Cx/C t^tiTA CaO^cMa^A. j (yU-<^t-iy ~6TA*4**y Aa^xaSaIUCx. OXA. £-*A^tX~ ! fafa tk ** U (] ZCvAiAAA-y' tCoosy*. (h-x3*-oG O&CoxZC &\*-*~-*^ ~Z^ac*a^Aa . i fa. jyJ~c^j (\uxaM, r^r#vU^v/< ^xocL "Co-c ‘N Wo-Ca-v •vvw. 4^. ^tw*vy . PlZU*. /aw S-tAAA. / ^ *^J H* /?V yl*r~ &~vy~t*~ , ^ ia. /^y^^A-iAjrvv^ - ” Aa^aL P~*V i^-e^JX*-. I/\aaJ $sVytsoxAAA^. kvv CeotA-JfrxK C> sj £-+aXs (~*a^o^*A- klji-tA i^vCT* HA«At4 iKxomMxa. ! 'p£Z / pAO\*jfO'PX~ XAS&C' 0"V*A* / IKj ^TA>1« t*lxX.j jnACOol^^fL *~yx PiZujXcyy^. KAA^ • fay j^o-4-4, &L*yl $ hc~*Ax pfax*Ms&»r1 pitysooy &-V~^X \xaaj <*X~ cC r U j-, Jo I 5 ( I&b -cXXi^Al 'tea* &n Vv^yv-^. . ~f' b^{jr-\y-L^ ^ ^S'fflZ L- irx y ia/'^Xaaj . Zx^-vaj yXt x’fc»y (CvaX J 7 (/V^-tXw V ^Ia t-XOAX ^ t.® \. V 'to-AvvX K**y(c 7 ' ^- ™ - — ^ XT X) u/vCvvU X. jj LCX tX/iAXA. ^ yXi-HX , /^x*- uMxj» ^X-AXy ‘IH\, ^ 1 - CvAl) — v<) Xoa. ^aY /fc^v \a^^c^a^ua^ *y t /^ L^viX, t/^\A. c ^cdhCfr ^-- LA/^Xh^A^-d-' \sL%Zxx> C*- (y^syO ^ j'ux^f * ^ cw^x- 'UsO^aU^' l. V ^ ^ixu^x.^ Oxsr^t^L > U^cL. (rtl-x. C^ / U ^a^ 1 ax cUshO £. AjLi*A~ . ^fcu IA/X*sf tsLA^/^y ^AaC^CL^ VlArxA-x. a^\ /Ahy. cU^*4_y ^2 IA-4a 2^ i^AAAV^^. ^ ^v/L^y ' \a^£^aa^Ia~ ^ ^ $J:. /isft^XJ-Xr _ f ^ /f < \hiA-^j dUxLe^Jt %z O t f // 4-*-- ^ /< 1 1 • ^ r T "On the afternoon of the 5th (Oct.) while walking on the Fitchburg R,R. between Waverly and Clematis Brook I saw a few (8- 10) Whi t e - b e 1 1 i e d S wa 1 1 ows sailing high up in the air. This was at 3.20 o'clock. In a short time they collected together in a compact flock, mounting the while to a prodigious height, the number increasing to upwards of 40 birds. Their intricate movements dur- ing their upward flight produced ant almost kaleidoscopic effect. They then moved rapidly off to the S* by E, at such a height that they could only be discerned by the aid of the opera-glasses and the favoring white clouds which were floating through the sky. As they moved off, the course, of the flock as a v/hole was direct, but apparently the flight of each individual was not in a bee-line. It appeared to me that the wind, which was then blowing light from the N, W, was an important agent in impelling them toward the South. Shortly after the departure of these, others to the number of 40 or 50 came upon the scene apparently from the north -feeding in the space lately occupied by their predecessors* I did not, see these depart but on my way back through" L over *• s Lane". (1/2 S, of the R.R. I saw probably these same birds about overhead. They gradually disappeared from view without my getting any clue to their course and a few were dispersedly seen up to 4.30 o'clock." ■J a ' ! Ci ' ,'frV Huai. (Xjy^i l b f 1 A'O X~--y0\. v^i. <^c c /7 u JO-<'>y L 7T~Z l7//a*Z- , 7//[y £j~**0 d-'Cr?~<. ^■ 7 'XK-' 0 \Ay 7?y y n&i vyy^ v y&y^--c^' t-»^vo r uj~yy z ^L-t„x *l^y. Zodjy x^j-^y^y y 7 %y 6 '\r^*yt'~ — ^^ia - ^ ^C^v ~ 5 > Za ~~ /xtm-s\s ^tA-c^v^ ^ry-x^j (y^xATiA. s^y U*~y ^v^L-vvX AtTv^A. ^v/tMAAA^ — y iy^yt ■^yj 0-4- «X^7 0^7 /Xt-v J , ^./yC\Jy~^^ (T\a. ^u, tXoxc ^3w L-i^y/sC^- tx\A./ / ^.y^V^-'V- jy jfcC XxjjyiiL v f //7 '^^s\aa y^y\y\ <^r? /~x^/yl / C t O^L-yyi 4 'Vt^ -oy^C\ 1 $cy-ps6 /tA^o ytsf~ (yjA^yf & y~o HtxyJiZ,_ 1 / ' ty~LAM*^ Ws{a}-^A~ (X.'AA-aA'' /^Ia/l^a. C>^/ °^- J y.'U^ l A/i^ (Asyy- y~ 7-'Cyo , C~Xla- Ihi/y^i^- - K/vvu- ^cxTy ^Cy " Ui 14 (T^&siyi y h&-AT^ At' /i? 7 /f 7^U. /'U^l v 1--^-/ ^VVI. 4777- Jt^y , 7- Qe-tiX At^eUl yZMK>y J^/yyy/ Ac^a, v -2t) .A (^.',. ^ / « CvJvuX ftA-^XZ ~ fasChuAj /wW4\j 7 < InAs/r^ / ^-^vt. O^rXy, ^*sH~ * / ' / '^V«L ,'*-'? 0\AsC^ W-'-'Xa. 4^-w^vv. ca 3( (fh^Mt^CtAt-t d/u-J; (fvw(. ‘. , vv ^ < ' V 0"W ''§fyfSV~/ l &-A fCi.., o / ^K- ^upj-^j, SU. .1 «~ <^a ■ y w-^ > /Xx»v*«c^ ^ y T* iaSP^^w^ *wi ^k * /t “T^fc-y A*A«Mr%, / «/ /•‘^W * v -^ rwv ^(wivZry , 4 £ar /d^i3T 4 y i%««| A&AC- Aal~a^ /fr£*&i HswM * wtf Jt.* * 4+A- m / / ^ ^ 4rt*y /£+-4 $j p <•* '~f p *%-s. A. A. /, ^Um£k, *, f '^A. A , -. . &&.. ixn A &* « % ry~/ ^ -*j_ i ^ Am i A ZpL f&4 fi*+xzrj \ ^ ifi|p noordj_Masa» A'^'v^ #L ^vtA ^ ^wv, Aw, fcn » ^*i - * m. ^j£- %ril-. f. 1393* *vv~ /(kv * w - A ^**A' — i 4 hicnlnr Tree Swallow. — Regularly met with 49. Iridoprocne bicolor. about the various lakes. (a., II (ZsCAtXsO. 228 Iridoprocne bicolor. Tree Swallow.- Regular summer resi- dent common April 8 to September 13; earliest record Marc , , latest fall record October 20, 1906 (H. H. Mitchell); breeds (June 7, 1890). Birds of Dead River Region, Me. F. H. 0. 40. Tachycinela bicolor, (Wliite-bellied Swallow). A common summer resident. Observed in the forest regions, where many would be seen skim- ming over the surface of the lakes. They breed about Eustis, in the hollow slumps of the clearings. O.&o. XI. Oct. 1886 . p. 146 SummerResidents on Southwest Ooaat of Maiae. Montgomery, Jr» 014. Tree Swallow. The most abundant bird at Boothbay during the first two weeks of July, but at the end of the month all ex- cept two or three pairs had left. & am 10, Wu 2 Tov,189Q. p,W2 Breezy Point, Warren, N.H. h, . ^ * Rye Beach, N.H. 1867. / $. /f Bye Beach, N.H. 1868. , ^ * *m 4 ^ . - jU4 ^>^3 / A^- * Rye Beach> N - H - 187L k xscJrC* \ . . Rye Beach, N. H. 3872. ' , ’ F; y^B~each,,N. H. July Q3-24 1885 .." ^ / ^^^^ bor o,N.H.J« n e.l7-1887. Bds. Obs. in Franconia, N.H. .June 11-21 ’86, and June4-Aug. 1,’87, W-Fa xoa 48. Tachycineta bicolor. White-bellied Swallow. — Common. Auk, V. April, 1888. p.152 Birds Obsvd. near Holderness, N.H June 4-12, ’85, and 4-11, *83, W. Faxon 41 Tachycineta bicolor . Wiiite-bellied Swallow. — Not common. Auk, V. April, 1888. p.150 White-bellied Swallow, ( TacAyaineta bi- color). Bare Summer resident. Arrives the last of April. Breeds, nesting in holes in trees. O.&o. X. May. 1885. p. // i; m s 't^-~ , <.._ . , A- y^-z-^z Jy-T^-^-^f zZ-Azy^ — . AZzAyA.^ - - - y / f , / . /Z^zT- (AyA A zAAz^^AA^--- /Az-. iA^AA AMA^SaA fifAr- A^zAA ^A^J?sy?AA JZ%A^Ay z3>ZAA ^ Z>^A ^ ZAAAlAy’ y^^Zze. — zi-A^A* — rtf- . jAAyy^^Azz--iZ /y Az^^- -/H^~ /Azz AL^-at-AArrA Zz^ /AzA. Z^AAAzA- ^t*<^*^*» /f * * » S * i v UAA^ J ~ a -^' — dzJj 7 4 ^ / ^- /IL ^ 4 f 7^ ^ Ayr AT . ^/i . ffijA+ithi iAc/rte^ &V , ■Z- -^cr e !^^^. y^*-y-> AAA* . ~Z^Z** zZ^z*- *f-Z ! ~z- 1 -?zf jH u-^ 4-cZ^ly /h^-*y^*^-^C aA>o--~- S^t^A, -> yy_4c4i*- y ( yyA^-Z AAy g^A~~~~z r n>-L^~ AA*. AA^-AZZZZ t jAz^A C~ (A, CfyZAAZy *- /Zs-C^S 37 ' ■ ■■.<■>, ^ 7Z^~tzAy^uL ^ujA^a . >^ 4 *-t. 69 I yi—. /2~ ^2-^^y-e. — . t%3y^^Ly J.'Y S-^ s<<-^ ^T7" — . /^Zy y^y / y^/- y^y^— &z-' ^y*y\j-y- flyZy- -*—^2' t*y ^\sC-*~«- ar^Cy£yO***. y j < 40 ^*^— y<^-K-/yL a ^*^< £‘~y~~1/tty(y'' y £ / {X* y^Ct-y^/ •/***. ”/i*y/rr..j a.: J/ ^ ^e-v. — t. ^s_ / U /?^- / %-- /i^UyZy ftt*A+6~r ; f / CyO^* ^C^y^yy ‘ — - /\yriA->-$ &7 //u^-^y~ ^v%. MASS. ( Middlesex Co J APR 25 1888 Two at West Townsend flying over the village. Seen daily at Ashby, but apparently not numerous anywhere in the region. In a pasture on the side of nt Watatic at an elevation af about 800 feet, I found a nest of this swallow in a natural hole in an old apple tree. The parent birds were wonderfully tame, and appa- rently wholly unsuspicious of any danger on account of our pres- ence. They would pass in and out of the hole when wecwere stand- ing wiohin a few feet of it, and when we looked in would, perch on twigs a yard or two above us without showing the least uneasiness. The nest conat ined four or five young about ready to fly. I ob- served that they were fed by both parents. One of the old birds in passing close by me occasional ly flapped its wings alternately like acehimney Swift, but usually the wing strokes were given to- gether. MAGS. ( Middlesex Co.) JifyyxJL 2, / h /tZ*. A - C/! r* 4i ( *k/ . ' tA+A t /e~t < J J u^a^-^a J/ y Ttr<^lJ Ct A^J, fa „ j^Zy ^ ^^UsZ<**A~l i?- ,a8 5 , ' ✓ 7 a^c^*/ . Mass, (near Cambridge). 1888 APR 25 itb og/OC e. -dt it "iCiS: ~ "W. Dentoi // wxr-. l Birds Known to Pass Breeding Season nr. Winchendon, Mass. Wm, Brewster 52. Tachycineta bicolor. Auk, V, Oct,, 1888. p.380 Bds. Obs. near Graylock Mt. Berkshire Co. Mass. June 28- July 10. W. Faxon 43- Tachycineta bicolor. White-bellbd Swallow - A few , sassr ° f Norlh u ” -* Auk, Tl. April, 1880. p.102 White-bellied Swallows Occupy Chimney Before Migrating. About the first of September last, while standing at my store door just before dark, I saw a large flock of White-bellied Swallows hovering around the chimney of Odd Fellows’ hall, which is opposite. While watching them they began to go into the chimney, sometimes a half dozen at once. This continued until all had disappeared in the chimney. There must have been at least one hundred and fifty. A neighbor, coming along at the time, informed me that he had seen them go in the chimney for a week. Is this not a rare occurrence? Lynn, Mass. JV. Vickary. /?'v. fyfrt 7 ] Si=iiioiiioiinoiomoi £i=onom moomooon / Li—\ 1 1 10101 iimn iioi aodoo'-W Z,i=t 1 1 1 1 1 101 10101 1 1 1 81=1 in 161 mom 11 m touQ 6i=riommmmmm jVttw 91— qjuqojr ii=oiiiiooinioiioooooi • — : z$ aour-uua ‘Sony pidtu ‘spSier oz UpS c,_ 8 =oooioiiioiioiio- • • Ayojnn ti— iiiionmiiioi • • • assajj oi=ioioiiioooiim - • • .regdv o — iiioooioiioiioi • u ( ui5jooryx £i=il,ooiiniiiiiri • • • j 3 ttiw 6 =oiiooiiioioiioi- • • • sutaj ti=looii 1 1 1 11 11 1 1 1 • ■ • iioqoM 9 — ? 0 5 I00In0I00 ?° ' ' • aadooo ei=oioiiiiiionni • ipowiaig . -lira qnp Aui; uioij o.vq jo smear ‘oeui ipea spS-ie; Si ‘ijp S =1000110011 •• uoriomipoiqx oi=iiiiiiini Auainrr a W^millTTT * S UXAT. . . d General Notes. Stray Notes from vicinity of Muskeget Island, Mass. George H. Mackay^ wS h hXd a s biC r;° r - At MUSkCSCt Isl ‘' lnd ’ MarCh 26 ’ lS 93> I «aw a - ^ “ ^on , h was . . - . Auk X. Oct , 189.3 p 870. <%S" 1-K.7ZJ YcS~y Birds Known to Pass Breeding Season nr. Winchendon, Mass. Wm. Brewster 52. Tachycineta bicolor. Auk, V, Oct,, 1888. p.389 Bds. Obs. near Graylock Mt. Berkshire Co. Mass. June28- July IS. W. Faxon 43- Tachycineta bicolor. White-bellied Swallow. - A few were ZAtZT ° f Norlh Ad ““' — — « Auk, Tl. April, 1880. p,102 t White-bellied Swallows Occupy a Chimney Before Migrating. About the first of September last, while standing at iny store door just before dark, I saw a large flock of White-bellied Swallows hovering around the chimney of Odd Fellows’ hall, which is opposite. While watching them they began to go into the chimney, sometimes a half dozen at once. This continued until all had disappeared in the chimney. There must have been at least one hundred and fifty. A neighbor, coming along at the time, informed me that he had seen them go in the chimney for a week. Is this not a rare occurrence? Lynn, Mass. A. Vickary. Si=moinoiiiioiomoi assaff £i=oiioiiiinooiiiooori Li — 1 1 r ioioi 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1101 1 • ■ ■ • • • • • • • • • j 3 (Ioo'’)*'iT 4 i=n 1 1 1 1 101 toiom gi=riiii6jiiioiiinnii '.*■ jCuDinrr 61=1011 mum mum * J3IPW jpu;upijj — : 2 $ aounaiuo ‘Snuy pidtu ‘sp3.nn oz ‘qjS c __ 8 =oooioiiioiioiio- • • AqoinQ ti— imoimimoi • • • assaji oi=ioioiiiooouiii • • • jBSdv- o — 1 1 1000101 101 101 • u 4 unpo.iqx £i=iiooumumi • • • -iamw 0 — 01 1001 1 ioioi 101 • • • • suta j £1=1001 iiiiiiiiiii • • • ^juqoH 9 —op 1 1001 ii 0I000 ° * * * aadoo^ 21=010111111011111' jpuiupag : *iuo ‘qnp Aub uiotj om; jo suiboj ‘ubui qoB3 spSuBj Si S =1000110011 •• uo^iounpoaqx 01=1111111x11 iCipina o — 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 101 ossaj-i 9=0110111100 .njSdv 01 — 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • • W _* 1 fillXAT f\ — niiiTiini .... * . General Notes. Island, Mass. George H. Mackay bic ° lor — At M«skeget Island, March 26, 1S91 I saw a atane’le t T'!™ a PP arentl T %>'ng due north on migration ; it was t an ele\ ation of about; sixty feet. Ant S,Oct,_1893 p 370. t r - Vr-s-rzr — < 1 js w® /* - MSP7II* **■ ■ 7 / - ^JUL- ^Af?V l r GJSZ^ J ^ / fo ,/fL, 5W~ 1 *«.'" C ^ <— * C4aa/ - r , r ... L ct"»L , - 7 i — - — p rr v. CvV.c Lyy^-t "" tA * ^ ■ V ' «W )/. OwJl 'M- 7^ c c^QjZ~ s ^^. t / t<-AX2/3 oV ^ ^ ( j ! ‘ * ^ <3jr" fyf{xK t '^4 A-*Cv^f ^T^v*-y Wv < VUUfJ^’ tfO - t - j - 7 tz { lezzAT ? (X. IrtAA , / w 4. ^ic A. j. Xrvt tuA 6y J /u* v ttz frAJt* - f* /ZZZZ. A^ZZ Z%Z ZZ^^f, ^Z^ZZy ■ -yr <4- +-Z-$~ZZ^ j - tt/4 The Singing of Birds. E.P.Biokneli. Hirundo bicolor. White-bellied Swallow. The song of this Swallow is hardly more than a chatter. This is to be heard as late in the year as the bird is with us. Its ordi- nary notes are less sharp and rapid than those of the Barn Swallow. Auk, I, Oot., 1884. p. 32 5 '. Song of the White-bellied Swallow ( Iridofrocne bicolor ). — I have seen no account of the song of this species, nor, indeed, was I aware of its musical powers until the past summer. May 24, at an elevation of 8000 feet, I found a little colony just beginning house-keeping in a cotton- wood grove on an island in the San Antonio River, Colorado. When at rest they uttered a peculiar chirrupy warble, bearing resemblance to a Sparrow’s song in some respects, and strikingly like a Robin’s in some of the half whistles. The species breeds as high as 10,000 feet, and, I believe, always in trees. — F. M. Drew, Howardsville , Colora&nll N.O.O. a, April, 1881, p, //S* cSuul A^cc/< f ^Sl&f ^ /S~W^ 4y 'to-LU ' _ fTLo^/Xe^ . 6tmd. xZ 7- ./zz. 1 19. T^e TP/itfe Bellied Swallow ( Iridojrocne bicolor). By S. Lock- wood. With a note by E. C[oues], Ibid., XIV, p. 54, Jan. 1880.— Feed- ing on bayberries. The Cotile rijaria observed feeding on bayberries by Mr. Alhnson ( see No. 115) believed to be an erroneous identification of I. bicolor . Amaf, Naturalist 154 - Bate Stay of Swallows. By F. C. Browne. Ibid., XV p 307 — ‘‘One or two thousand” White-bellied Swallows ( Tachycineta bicolor) \t Clark s Island. Plymouth, Mass., Oct. 13, 1880. FOT. & BUmm J S °' ^otesfromj/telter Island [JV. r.j By Moses B. Griffing. S^etc.' Whlte - be " ied Swal,ow — Oct. 25 and one* Nov. .3’, O. 524 ■ Ornithological Notes. By Ernest D. WintTe. Ibid Hindoo -t Pai ;° f White - beUied Swall °- *7 r 3 eggs; Catbirds la^ng’spo ted eggs; ‘two species of Crow Blackbird in Canada,” but the supposed occurrence of ^uiscalas major is doubtless erroneous, as stated by Everett mi 1 ( b,d.. hi, p . 207). (See below, No. 526.) Pan- Sport, & Naturalist We recently received a nest of the White-bellied Swallow. It is thickly lined with pure white hen’s feathers ; together with the four white eggs, the ap- pearance is one of unusual delicacy. O.&O. XIV, Jul. 1889 pill Auk, XIL April, 1895, .&V- ' S J~ L/ : Mortality among White-bellied Swallows in Florida. — During the almost unprecedented cold snap which prevailed throughout I lorida in the first half of February, an exceedingly large number of White-bellied Swallows succumbed to the severity of the weather. These were either directly killed by the sudden fall in temperature or were overcome by the scarcity of insect food occasioned by the protracted cold. While I have no information as to the condition of affairs in other parts of the State, it seems reasonable to suppose that what was observed in this section obtained elsewhere. On February 13, while driving along the stage route between Lake Worth and Biscayne Bay, numerous dead birds were noticed. At New River, on the afternoon of the same day, when the cold was not especially severe, although it had been so the previous night, many Swallows while on the wing were seen to fall lifeless into the river. I learn that at Lemon City for several days the boys amused themselves by dropping their hats over benumbed or exhausted Swallows on the docks. On the morning of February 15, seven dead birds were taken from under the seat of a catboat where they had evidently sought shelter during the previous afternoon and had perished in the night. The same day I noticed many dead Swallows in the water and on the shores of Biscayne Bay adjacent to this place. At Cocoanut Grove, about ten miles further south, many birds were killed, over sixty dead Swallows being found one morning on the roof of a piazza. Persons who visited the ocean shore, which is a favorite resort for these birds, reported the beach as thickly bestrewn with dead Swallows. At the house of refuge, located on the coast oppo- site this place, over one hundred and fifty dead birds were counted one day. An examination of the alimentary tracts of some of the birds showed an entire absence of food ; and to this cause, rather than the direct influence of the cold, I am inclined to attribute the exceedingly great mortality which ensued. — Hugh M. Smith, Lemon City , Dade Co ., Florida. Yol. XV] 1898 J General Notes. 27I Nesting Instincts of Swallows.- — X.s supplementing Mr. Brewster’s record of the premature exhibition of the nest-building and procreative instincts of Swallows (see Auk, XV, April, 1898, p. 194), I may add some observations made on Tree Swallows ( Tachycmeta bicolor ), at Leonia, N. J., during August and September, 1897. The extensive salt marshes in which myriads of these birds roost in July, August, and September, are here crossed by a road over which I passed almost daily and rarely with- out seeing in the road, one or more flocks of Tree Swallows, varying in size from eight or ten to several hundred birds. Without exception, as far as I observed, and I studied them very closely at short range, these birds were in the immature plumage of birds of the year. By far the larger number seemed to have no special object in alighting in the road, they did not move about as though searching for food, indeed for the most part were practically motionless, but occasional^ a pair would copulate, as described by Mr. Brewster, and more often a bird would pick up a bit of dried grass and fly up into the air with it, or sometimes it was carried fifty yards or more and dropped from the air; at others the bird would carry it to the telegraph wires bordering the road and drop it after perching a moment. Additional evidence of inherited knowledge was apparently given by many Tree Swallows which were often seen hovering about a pile driven in a creek which traversed these meadows. I at first supposed these birds to be feeding on insects which presumably had alighted on the pile, but the number of birds, often a dozen or more were seen about the pile, and the persistency with which they remained there, forced me to conclude that in a wholly unreasoning way they were looking for a nesting site. Frank M. Chapman, American Museum of Natural History, New T ork C^f tfa. Eastern Massachusetts. k WvX_ J, sb<>faa/zsoa/ m lo hfud J CU K*. S^T. Q^IaS. &-. lid. ~ *~l t l J~73ZS~ > Jo * Wf. 5?Kl<. t- ll ,a !jv CJ-- 7 r. 1 1 * tv St , , &i- ^ fa fa fa m..ty r •- ' A*A*-*-. 17 -. z*i£_3/Z inf. d I7 K ;IV U lf®.JL/klzt tt'kink 3o* . 3/<£> /jfo. L *iy. X . e - ... & - , f— - II- Ji-- If-Jl**- 17-- a ASlf ,JC -/jnf. IS l. W K /al. 2oSll~. 1 7— Hsfo. zf k \ /m d?! jm 2y (ws 0 /Souij tUic/OiL-tt n^ix u 3L!f- SJS^'lk * z? *ZM U f*u 3o'- m? !W( Jl£SKtL£ .tXfl, /L/om^JS' 00 - /9 1/s *l/$,l/**[l /f M .2e- 11 S 21 ® &ok /m. ?Tvf r 77 T zc» '- 4 ‘ 1m~€m w* fWt f ^V-r/vVo mi ,s 3 ? jb ft, jkzkL/^m. (c- 7k X k /sk /(ok /t-m ? k 20 l - d/ k -&^cdy msz Tmjimmj CyJo+*\! iyjji Wmm M- /frp~ ms/w 7 zz s fWL , / SPJ if L/ &6A ?'-f_/j^/3±/yX/(T®f£>-/7 " /*'-/?*&/ *M l - 1? l . 8/--&#**s4./m. 3*1 S' i. L .7 x - J* 3 1/J '£ /v l°/f tJtoii&k. 4m x~A- t i. Yxx, C ( \^ C ■■{ & Cl y r//\A-~^7 1 ' ■ ■'•’ ‘ ' ^ ^ / tsCo-A- %_, Lty-^YOtk v ("<-« 7 - ^/^/ /-vil t/'Z**. '.^Y./sl-r ~Yta AACZA^.yt ^ - * ■■ -* ’■(__ <=c a-on^yC aJT - x^v^c. l.\/\,Ay\ > ’’.y S^£«SL ^xyxA-^y /^ACxs? , y r- . . yXA y--A^j YaA^ . „ . l\AA^X- 7 C <- t / MAV^ y ’ kr ^ yy^^—y c^A^, ZZT^ ^ / ' ^ ZT Isxra^-O CxA'ty$ ^t) ^x//vaaa . $Cv (flexile ixAOxytt*^: tr^ly W 77 C4 4w tJx.A.Ml'- 'ihr^A~ jh Ayf <^. lAj-Yr-L- ^CT l/^l n~xA — y^-x^cZ 'U-tSZ fo- ? .> ,.-^v- v/ y -c 7 v -v v'j - ■/i^i - 35 - . A tv^- t-i^v^ix^^vxA^^ A^SkkZZzi, Az^Cksy, 4 /? ^77 . 4 ^Ls^Ak. . / c VVwvv ‘X^'Xs^J Q'l^Q t; tzz ^y/ ^ C// 1 a/x> *4.j//Cfy-KsO-Tf , IFZks*- aJc I'V'sC'^v fV~is\U^+~ dsV~-\ASY _ edb^-iXJT' 7 T^^-vhvt// ^^TiT-kj../^ c+-s//^skk2 ma? t^slU L ^l>-x ^6 aV^| ^Ikkky #c ( 1 a*a>v/ Ca^Ma-^ Ct 7 « VC^l- A- ktkZk^LSJ Akz. 7 * / . y ^ ^A-x.^ZAf xsj r y C4y»7^t / 7 ', ,/r ^rA/^xA^v— » Copied from Journal. * ^ aZzzzp ^/£<2X>r / ' y'jfy-fyty&y ss^^S^-pS' ^z'z&wZ' ppzs^/s^p^S' ytzzy p ' /Z4> j^ 7%^ S&^. l'/i. #>S S cVcl'l tltdO o v& > i®m. s£pfaa&&z' ' // %AziZ /TfZ /yZ/Z& Z^^ZZ s^fzztzf' S j/sS^s^fz sf y/yZzyy^ ZZ'zS /ZyZZvZZ /&***ftS zzzf s^Z/^ y£&£*7 a> /fyfZTfyZZ yS Z^yZyy'-' ^ZZZ yi&ZZZy&Z&Z' zZzZd y^/Z&Z/j' . 7^/^Zf/^ 7%Z6 Z&ZZ&S yZz/&7vZ ZZ/Z^ZZi^ szsf' SZ'/z7?Z/fyZf V'fr ZZZ y^Z y^ZyZZZZy Copied i’roni Join'll?. Ci. fli-iyiu l iuf o utf? . 8$S«« / /?£> ' ^ i sz Jty&r- /? dzy^?<^zji3 aA^i/js /£, /A-^' , A// s/s /2-Z6 ?SSs&A^O*y ^-t WCM^A s&tiuu ./aw fPuW M-^-^ /A s&Lc ^/fy-y /Z4£ Jttxz/&740 4 >z 4£A%£ ^A^zr^/ <2pc*6 /z /bis a ^ry£t & 7Z?*16 JLy4£ ' a/r*6 a, Birds Of Upper St, John Batetieldw. 34 . Cotile riparia {Linn.) Boic. Bank Swallow— Co Bali. N. 0. 0, 7 , April, 1882, p. 110 , — Common. 176 . Cotile riparia— Shot at Godbout, June 8 , 1885 . t? r f *7. £ Auk, 2, July, 1886. p. *3 / 3 . Summer Bds. Restigouche Valley N.B July, *88. J. Brittain and P.Cox, Jr. Clivicola riparia. Bank Swallow. — A small colony at the the mouth of the Kedgwick. Auk, VI. April, 1880 . p .118 - 47- Cli-vicola riparia. Bank Swallow. — Tolerably common, breed- ing on Grindstone.. Auk, VI. April, 1880. p. 148 D\vi£bi, Bummer Birds of Prince Edward Island, Clivicola riparia. Bank Swallow— I perhaps do this species an in justice when I say that it is outnumbered by the Savanna Sparrow anc for nesting places. Auk X, Jan, 1893. p.12 Froe. Xiiaaaaaa SC'O of N. Y, 88-89 Dr. C. Slover Allen instanced the death of many Bank Swallows ( Cliv - icola riparia) after a three days’ storm at Grand Menan. '^1 j 229. Riparia riparia. Bank Swallow. — Regular summer resident, common April 19 to September 13; earliest record April 4, 1890, latest October 9, 1886; breeds (June 2, 1892). lint Penobscot Bay, Maine. TvwX'j J) OJjcp A. i - ^a-u_ C-^J* {*^Sy — * » Jo t f\+As*~jjX <"* (s^yLjU ^£yv~-y o^-^X -*Ai< * yJxxAAJ^^-^^ ^-A^sr-X^ */. ?c ?U) SummerResidents on South-west CSoa3fc of Maine. S’. H, Montgomery, Jr, 616. Bank Swallow. Shot an adult $ , and saw two others at Bobson’s Island. OjmdO, 15a N 6 v, 1800. p,lQ2 Rye Beach., N*H.1867. / / .a*— Rye Beach, N.H. 1868. Rye Beach, N.H. 1871. CtyWL^ wLca^ . _ Rye Beach, N.H. 187?. Bds. Obs. in Franconia, N.H. June li-21 '80, and June4-Aug. 1, ’87. W. Faxon 49- Clivicola riparia. Bank Swallow— C ommon. Auk, V. April, 1888, p.152 Bds. Obs. at Franconia and Bethlehem N.H. July- August, 1874. J, A. Alien 33. Clivicola riparia. Common. Auk, V. April, 1888. p.154 Breezy Point, Warren, N.H. /V 1895. ^ £-t> Cl ivicola ripar ia. Peterborough, Hew Hampshire. 1398. July 5 to Aug . 1 5 Five or six fresh-looking nesting holes in a sandbank near the village but no birds met 'with. Deane saw a few at Jaffrey. Bummer Bds.Mt. Mansfield, Vfc. by Arthur H, Howell. 50 . * Clivicola riparia. Bank Swallow. — Common. ’Auk, XVIII, Oct., 1901, P.343. fo £3, . _ j£Z?, C B- Mass. 1885. c im frZcjb-- iX jL*** *r <^nZ2ZT ^ J ^ __ i (/U^JC ^-Vfc vtZthvU-f ^ ^C_1 A^7 L+yAjLA^ 7yy-Wy A' , — ■ ,y>-wv*<>V -*AXI - v '~ 0 (r, *. -Xiw^L ^7 ^ f«y ; J ^ui "wn ^ ■ ' Tfo WW/ kaj*J*4*A4 . toM-tX fa+iUJy V. Albinos. lfV W. OTTO EMERSON, HAYWARDS, CAE. One of the most interesting freaks of nature, if we can so call it, is the Albinoism in quadru- ped or bird, in some cases very beautiful. A number of specimens have come under my ob- servation in the Fauna of California bird life, and I will try and give the O. &. O. readers full benefit of them. Bank Swallow (Clivicola riparia) . This Al- bino Swallow was first seen by a friend of mine, flying with a number of others, near their nesting site, the rough face of a high gravelly hill, that had been washed down for years by the process of hydraulicing for gold, near Placerviile (known as Hangtown in early days), El Dorado County, 1873. On the third day it was seen, the swallows commenced an at- tack on their white mate, and did not stop until they had killed it, its white coat standing it as no truce of peace. The gentleman saw it drop af- ter the hard struggle for life, picked it up and brought it into town, as a great chriosity, and so it proved. I had a good chance to examine the swallow, which proved to have been a young bird, well feathered, and of a dull ashy or rusty white color all over. (QtHd.jhi- />• Albmiem and Melanism in North American Birds. Suthven Deane. 3 -a yj* t c. npama , Ball N.O.O. l a April. 1876, p,2l /^2 -tr6e~<) i Cotile riparia. Sand Swallow— While examining some Sand Swal- low’s burrows on Cranberry Islands, this summer, three were found con- taining two nests each, each nest having in it fresh eggs. The finding of two nests with eggs in the same burrow struck me as somewhat remark- able and I thought it was perhaps worthy of notice— Harry Merrill Bangor , Maine. Bull. N. O.O, mer> ifa^nralifita Yd, IQ* <• 210. Odd Nesting Places. By Col. Culver. Ibid., XVIII, No. 16, p. AH ' / /f ■, 'A a ^t^xAA^y /^tooo^ toti^ ^ d/L*^s*-S^ <-^A ^K^/U. C^aZ^^-<^ ~Z^CT ^o^ ^m/ fthZ^ W^uy fio-vtt. Al /-A^xS^ A^e<^y, jA£^ 2Z^\ e^ y/* t^C* ^yA X^V-a Ava / A •“ ff Clivicola versus Riparia. — In ‘The Auk ’ for July, 1898, pages 271-272, Dr, Coues draws attention to the fact that the generic name Riparia Fors- ter (Synop. Cat. Brit. Birds, 1817, 17) has page priority over the current Clivicola. Forster {ibid., p. 55) ; at the same time expressing his preference for the adoption of the former. The A. O. U. Committee, however, refused to accept Riparia on the ground that Clivicola was used by the ‘ first reviser.’ These two names are founded upon the same species and are both unaccompanied by diagnoses, so that there can be no question of their equal pertinency. Canon XVIII of the A. O. U. Code, which treats of generic terms published simultaneously, makes no definite pro- vision for just this kind of a case; but in the preceding canon, with regard to specific names, the following occurs: “Of names of undoubt- edly equal pertinency, and founded upon the same condition of sex, age, or season, that is to be preferred which stands first in the book.” Therefore, unless we are to have on this point arbitrarily different rules for species and genera, a procedure apparently both unnecessary and undesirable, Clivicola must give way to Riparia. That the above quoted principle of page priority was intended to apply to genera as well as to species is evidenced by rulings of the Committee; as witness Guara, instead of Leucibis, which was adopted by the ‘first reviser’ — a perfectly parallel case. While recourse to the decision of the ‘ first reviser ’ is often attended by more or less uncertainty, arising from the possibility of overlooking some obscure publication, the great advantage in the strict application of the principle of anteriority, as priority of pagination or sequence in the same book may be called, is that it furnishes means for a definite and final decision, thereby contributing to hasten on the millennium of zoolog- ical nomenclature — stability of names. — Harry C. Oberholser, Wash- ington, D. C. A,ak, XVI. July, 1899, p. 2.81, 21 . [ Hibernation of Swallows.'] Ibid., pp. 35 , 36 . — Communication by Robert R. McLeod covering statements by John F. Goss and A. S. Free- man regarding the discovery of Bank Swallows hibernating in mud and in a hollow tree. Field &Foj?» Voi.8 tk Swallows [ Cotile riparia~\ Feeding on Bayberries. By James Allin- Ibid., XIII, p. 706. Nov. 1879. ( See below, No. 117.) 4m a>. ’Vn.fcnrn.Hsit Xi}*\cL> cWfff-unvtu Ca-v+a.cA ISO > V - i oC ( The Nesting of Stelgidopteryx serripennis in Norwich, Vt. — May 6, 1905, I was walking along the bank of the Connecticut River in Nor- wich, Vt., when two swallows, perched on a dead limb over the water, attracted my notice. A near view at once made their identification as Rough-winged Swallows certain.^ On a visit to the same place the fol- lowing day, I found the swallows still about, and in hopes of obtaining a breeding record I began to search for a nest. On May 12 I was rewarded by seeing the pair of swallows flying back and forth to a clay bank beside the road. There, about twenty feet up, was a hole into which the birds were carrying grass and leaves for lining material. The tunnel, measuring 20 inches in length, slanted slightly upward, and contained a nest at the further end. The hole was notice- ably larger in diameter than those of a colony of Bank Swallows in a bank near by. My observation of their nesting was interrupted more or less by other work and so is not as complete as I wish. During the last two weeks of May the swallows were busy incubating, both taking turns at sitting on the eggs. In early June the young were hatched and both birds took care of the young. Unfortunately I had to leave before the young birds were able to fly. April 29, 1906, I found the pair of Rough-winged Swallows again flying back and forth over the river. They returned to the old nest, which they cleaned out and relined, and again used to rear their young. Their return to the old nest leads me to feel quite sure that they have used the nest for a number of years, and I shall look for them again next spring. That a pair of Rough-winged Swallows have chosen this spot to breed in, seems of unusual interest to me, because in a heavy hemlock woods not more than one hundred yards distant, Winter Wrens, Red-breasted Nuthatches, and a pair of Northern Pileated Woodpeckers breed. — • Francis G. Blake, Hanover, N . H. Aak, XXIV, J~EU , 190';', ?.<<>?* V Vir ^^JVvy A »- 2< - Z $r-'< 9 ^r*- ZZ^t * *g ^cZ' "ZSJZ A( ’^*- ’ ^ 7 /^Y -C — ^i- jp- _ The Rough-winged Swallow ■(, Stelgidopteryx serripennis) Breeding near Springfield, Mass. — In the July number of ‘The Auk,’ I reported the capture of a Rough-winged Swallow at Longmeadow near Springfield. Afterwards, not far from the place where this one was taken, three more were observed, and a pair of these were found to be breeding. The site of the nest was located in a ravine two hundred feet long, washed out a few years ago from a bluff twenty feet above the flood plain of the Con- necticut River. This pair were successful in raising their young. I noticed that they flew low and did not pause in their flight, as do the Bam Swallows; they often came to feed their young through the woods adja- cent to a portion of the ravine, flying not more than ten feet from the ground. — Robert 0. Morris, Springfield, Mass. , _ .7 6,3. Breeding of the Rough-winged Swallow in Berkshire County, Mas- sachusetts. — On July 3, 1906, as I was waiting for a train at the railroad station in Glendale, Berkshire County, Massachusetts, I saw a pair of Rough-winged Swallows flying back and forth over the Housatonic River. Skimming just above the surface of the rapidly flowing water they passed and repassed the station very many times, giving me excellent opportuni- ties for making out their characteristic coloring and markings. Once they alighted on a large, flat-topped boulder at the water’s edge where they moved about by a succession of short, quick runs, reminding me of Semipalmated Plover feeding on a sand beach. I have never before seen swallows of any kind move so quickly by the aid of their feet alone. After drinking at a pool of rain water which had collected in a hollow in the rock, these birds took wing again and resumed their regular, coursing flights. They frequently passed under a bridge by which the road from the vil- lage to the station crosses the river, and twice they turned sharply upwards and disappeared for a moment among its supporting rafters, which were twenty-five or thirty feet above the water. Suspecting that they might have a nest there I went out on the bridge, but I could not well see under it. On a telephone wire stretched across the river near the bridge I found, however, three young Rough-winged Swallows, fully grown and feathered, clamoring loudly for food, which their parents brought to them every few minutes. I had a fine view of these young birds, for they were perched in full sunlight within ten or twelve yards of me. Probably there were one or two others of the brood under the bridge, but of this I could not make sure. Two of those on the wire sat facing me, showing very distinctly the rich, reddish brown or fulvous markings on the throat and upper part of the breast, which are so characteristic of the young of Stelgidopteryx serripennis. Their plumage was wholly free from down, and their wings and tails appeared to be of full length. They must have been out of the nest for a week or more, but I consider it probable that they were hatched and reared in the immediate neighborhood. Although from the first I had entertained no doubts as to the identity of the old birds, I was glad of the opportunity here afforded for directly comparing them with a number of Bank Swallows which were flying about over the river just above the bridge. Whenever the two species came together it was easy to distinguish them, almost at a glance, for the Rough-wings looked a third larger and very much browner than the Bank Swallows, and they showed no traces of the dark pectoral band so conspicuous in the latter birds. — .William Brewster. Cambridge, Mass. Auk, 2€, Apr., 1907, p. The Rough-winged Swallow breeding in Connecticut, and other Notes. — On June 17, 1900, I secured a male Rough-winged Swallow (1 Stelgidopteryx serripennis) which was flying about a little brackish pond by the Thames River, near Gales Ferry. Later, on June 23, I found in a neighboring railroad embankment two nests of this species. Both were dug into the bank about an arm’s length and just under the over- hanging sods and roots. One of the nests, which I examined carefully, contained five pin-feather covered young. The parents were seen cir- cling nervously about, all four being present, which led me to believe another nest must be in the vicinity, which I failed to discover. '7-*e4e*' 7 Ivvc-id . Auk, XVII, Oct., 1900, p . 3 8 f, Some Birds of Rare or Accidental Oc- currence in New England. H- A. Pur die 7. Stelgidopteryx serripennis. Rough- winged Swallow. — A female of this species was shot at Suffield, Conn., by Mr. Shores, June 6, 1874. At last this bird has been taken within our limits. It will be interesting to determine whether it proves to be in future a regular visitant to New' England. Bull. N, O.O, 2, Jan. , 1877. p, 21 Rough- winged Swallow in Connecticut. — Although not given by Samuels as a bird of New England, and classed as “ a rare summer visitant” by C. H. Merriam in his “Birds of Connecticut,” the Rough- winged Swallow breeds regularly in this State. It has nested for the past three seasons in the old stone abutments at a road-crossing over the New York, New Haven, and Hartford Railroad, within eight or ten rods of the depot at Green’s Farms, twenty-six miles west of New Haven. Half a dozen pairs nested there last season, and perhaps more ; but, judging from the number seen, I should say there were fewer than during the season of 1877. I have been unable to account for the fact that more than thirty trains could pass within six or eight feet of their nests each day, and not drive them away or apparently disturb them in the least. — _ J. A. Stannis, Hartford, Conn. BuLL N.O.O. 4, April, 1879, p, //“ Connecticut, Juse, 1883, AA 3 f-.jf /I t ^ , ' v ar y J ,-vww GV. -^-JT 'Ht-CZZT &) He Its) ■ fas-jy ^ ^ c4jrh ~ j^jJ ZZ ' &L. ty. ‘3^ 'usft^L tXfS. ' , fht 7^ Aa k ■/ y <■■{. VVvvm^ 'Zz fi+sMc ' J C+\A rtxcLXki ~£T\J. pwX. fiTy/. < f.y f < 4 ^ t-vT” % /wyA />c,v.4r ikwat Wv *jt y / ; c ' sf tWw* p * f J . ' > fSJT’ 7 /tCAAlJ , 'Wf'Vw <3-^ TCLi /Amc- x. v »x 7 Lrvfj.7 lAfXtf, ^Vv , «<* *-‘c titk- CrttbX* USl wWi - ; , , , ’ ' •. 7 A. ^ — H. tfc_ ' 6-IaUL, — . y • , , . , Y> , ui. . !>( « /'I ' _r ^ C^uwf — ' — General Notes. Connecticut Notes. - Lewis H. Porter. During the spring of 1894 the writer took two sets of the eggs of the Rough-winged Swallow ( Stelgidopteryx serripennis ) ; one of six eggs on May 26, and one of five on June 9. — Lewis H. Porter, Sta?nford, Conn. Auk XII. Jan. 1895 p. 86 Connecticut Bird Notes. — This spring (1901) Mr. J. B. Canfield of Bridgeport, Conn., reports that three pairs of Rough-winged Swallows (Stelgido-pteryx serritennis ) nested in this vicinity. Judge John N. Clark, of Saybrook, notes another pair in that locality; and while en route on his trip to New Hampshire he noted a pair at White River Junction. Mr. R. Heber Howe, Jr., reports a pair at Gales Ferry. Mr. Calvin Rawson (‘J- M. W.’) of Norwich, Conn., also reports two pairs of Rough-wings, one nesting under the Laurel Hill bridge, and the other in the new coal pocket. I wish to record the nesting of three pairs of Rough-winged Swallows, one pair at Millstone Point, a short distance south of New London, first noticed May 12; a pair in Groton, opposite New London, June 10; and a pair still further east in Poquonnoc, also on June 10, about ten miles from the Rhode Island border. Rough-winged Swallows are evidently extending their breeding range farther and farther eastward, and are more numerous than generally sup- posed, and the A. O. U. Check-List should include Connecticut as within its breeding range. This is the verdict of Judge John N. Clark of Saybrook, Conn., one of our most careful observers, with long years of experience in ornithological field work. Auk, XIX, Jan., 1902 , P ■ 9J- LZ~. y /3+,*c> ^ 5. Stelgidopteryx serripennis, (Audubon) Baird. I have found this Swallow on but one occasion, in May, 1872, when a single pair nested in this neighborhood, in a bank close to a stable, beside a pond. I watched this pair while they constructed their nest, during which time they were often seen to alight close together, on a board-fence from which they de- scended after the rough materials of which the nest was composed, — hay and feathers. Late in May I captured the female sitting upon four fresh eggs. I had no difficulty in doing this, for the hole was quite large, and not very deep, so that, by baring my arm, I could easily introduce it to the back of the hole. These eggs are pure white, and one of them meas- ures .80X.53 of an inch. wa. 9 /A^ //Lw Bull, NiO>Q* o « %J an, j 18 { 8 , p. S ' 7 /A * ‘£> *»* V if*. /? /(!? , Stelgidopteryx serripennis. Rough-winged Swallow. — This spe- cies is a regular summer visitor, arriving about the last week in April, and though no't uncommon in the spring, but few remain to breed. By the first week in August, however, the species again appears, apparently on its southern migration, and becomes much more abundant than in the spring. On August 5, last, I noticed numbers of these birds in flocks of from ten to thirty individuals lining the fdnces along the roadside and outnumbering any of the other species with which they were associating. After September 9 none were observed. The greater abundance of this species in spring and late summer than in the intermediate season would seem to indicate a more northern range, and this, taken in connec- tion with the proximity to the Connecticut State line, and the fact that the course of migration at this point tends towards the northeast, would ap- pear to render their regular occurrence there almost assured. Bull. N.O.O. 3, July, 1878, p, / 30 / 3 / . /: r. Bull N.O.O. 3, July, 1878, c?-z. d e ficc/ {rvr - _ Stelgidopteryx serripenis. Rough-winged Swallow. — I shot one at New Utrecht, April 19, 1878. Bull. N. O.O. 3, April, 1881, p. *Z.C ■ Vol. XI *893 J Ge?ieral Notes. 369 Breeding of the Rough-winged Swallow at Shelter Island, New York.— While collecting with Mr. W. W. Worthington of Shelter Island, N. Y., June 3, 1893, I found a nest of the Rough-winged Swallow contain- ing four much incubated eggs. The nest was placed in a bank about forty feet high, on the shore; it looked like an old Bank Swallow’s burrow. It was two feet from the top of the bank and twenty-seven inches deep. The chamber the nest was in was twelve inches in diameter, and was completely filled with dried sea grasses on which the eggs were laid. I shot the female, and as it fell in the water the male came up and tried to help its disabled mate, at the same time uttering a most plaintive cry. — Harry B. Sargent, New York City. Auk X. Oct 1803 Auk, XIV, Oct., 1897, p. w- „ Rough- winged Swallows {Stelgidopteryx sernpenms ) in Greene and Ulster Counties, N. Y. — On May 29, 1897, I found a pair of Rough- winged Swallows beginning to build in Palenville, Greene County, June 11. The nest with six eggs was procured. At Quarryville (about five miles south of Palenville, being in the extreme northern part of Ulster County) there is a small colony of these birds breeding regularly every year, in the crevices of the rocks. Here I took a male specimen June 27, 1896, and a nest containing five eggs June 29, 1897. These specimens were identified by Mr. Frank M. Chapman. — S. H. Chubb, New York City. (S' f rlect^Sh * 20. Stelgidopteryx serripennis. Rough-winged Swallow. — Said to be “rarely seen,” and three records given. According to Mr. Miller it is a “not uncommon summer resident near Peterboro.” Sy /?. XX, July, 1003, p. 869 113 The Rough-winged Swallow. BY W . E. SAUNDERS. For a bird of its comparative abundance there is probably none so little known and studied as the Rough-winged Swallow. In this portion of Ontario it is quite common and is generally found near water; frequently in company with the Bank Swallow. In appearance, (light and general habits it resembles that species very much and the two are often confounded. It may, however, be easily recognized when in : the hand by the roughness of the edge of the first primary, or by the breast which is ashy from the chin to the belly, contrasting with the white under parts of the othex, across which is the well-known dark belt. It may generally be recognized on the wing by the same means j and assistance may be recieved from the bright- er, more metalie brown of the back, the slightly wider wings and slightly larger size, though J until one is tolerably familiar with it the only reliable means of identification while on the wing is the breast coloration. Probably half of the ornithologists in Ontario and the eastern and middle states who are unacquainted with this bird have seen it dozens of times, but have supposed it to be the Bank Swallow. As above stated the habits of the two are very similar, and they often breed near to- gether, though not more than one or two pairs of Rough-wings will be found with the Banks. The holes of the Rough-wings are always much larger and deeper than those of the other much resembling a short Kingfisher’s hole. The nest is built of straws, generally finer than those in the Bank Swallow's nest; which is accounted for by the fact that the Rough- , ° wings never in my experience use feathers as a lining, while the Bank Swallows always do. There is about as much difference in the size | of the eggs as of the birds, those of the Rough- wings being slightly larger both in length and [ breadth. In the number of eggs in a set, how- ever, there is a marked difference. The average j number of eggs in a set of Bank Swallow is ; four, seldom three and often five, while five is a small set of Rough-wings and six or seven is the usual number, probably eight are sometimes taken. I have paid some attention to these birds to try and discern some difference in the voice but have so far been unable to do so though oppor- tunity has been ample. While the nesting hab- its as described above have been my invariable experience, I am well aware that in other parts of the country habits differ and cavities in rocks and holes in abutments of bridges are the chosen nesting place, and it would be interest- ing to discover where this bird uses rock, and where sand and if possible why its tastes vary in different localities, and to this end I would be glad to receive information from all parts of the habitat of this species, stating the breeding places, whether in sand or rock and whether in the locality named both places are attainable; the average set taken, the material used in the nest, the approximate length and width of the hole and the reasons which may occur to any- one as to why its habits are as stated. A pos- tal card bearing even on one point only will often be valuable evidence and the result will be furnished to the O. and O. for publication as soon as practicable. a.ArO. ira. nv,b. 1888 d. 28 -1 ?. Notes on the Nesting of the Rough- Winged Sparrow. BY WALTER HOXIE. I have continued my observations upon the pair of Rough-winged Swallows mentioned in a previous note. After the first set of three eggs were taken, j they laid another set also of three, which I in- I tended they should hatch. But their nest was . discovered by a lad who lives near me, and knowing my liking for such things, he brought | them to me to-day, nest and all. I knew it was useless to return them, as he said he got them the day before and could not find me till to-day, so I have blown them, though it was hard work, the young birds being nearly ready to hatch. Mr. Alfred Cuthbert has taken a number of sets this year of five and six eggs, but “ my : pair ” seem to be less in enterprising, and only get as far as threes. 0.&0. XIII.Jnlv. 1888 p.’Oa The Rough-Winged Swallow. The Rough-winged Swallow is imputed as rare in all places of its occurrence. However, I believe it is of more general occurrence in almost all parts than is thought, it being too frequently overlooked or confounded with its very near relative, the Bank Swallow. Mr. J. L. Davison does not mention this bird in his “List of Birds of Niagara County, N. Y.,” while here in the adjoining county (Orleans) it is a summer resident that may bo depended upon, and several sets of its eggs are taken each season. This bird is so like the Bank Swallow in every particular that the only safe means of identification is the bird in the hand. ‘ However, it may be identified when flying towards one by an observation of its throat and breast. The throat of the Bank Swallow is white, and it has a black pectoral hand, while the Rough-winged species has a black or brownish throat and no such band on the breast. The bird in the hand will reveal the peculiarities from which it takes it name. Although the sand bank, the homo of the Bank Swallow, is generally ascribed as the nesting place of the Rough-winged, in this locality at least, such is not the case as often as otherwise. Here, the favorite nesting place of Serripennis seems to he in the crevices of the stone work which forms the side of the Erie Canal or the abutments to its bridges, or in crevices of stone work in the vicinity of any water, and I think that if those who are seeking for this bird will look carefully about such places in their locality they will find it not uncommon there. The nest is loosely composed of straw (almost entirely), with sometimes the addition of some feathers. The eggs are pure white, and I find that they differ from those of the Bank Swallow in at least two particulars. First, they are not so much pointed and may be a trifle larger; and second, the number of them is generally greater, the complete set generally consisting of seven or eight eggs, which are deposited the last week in May. The Rough-winged Swallow does not arrive from the South until the first week in May, and departs unnoticed in the fall. Neil F. Poxson. Medina, N. Y. NUTTALL ORNITHOLOGICAL CLUB. 9 NOTES ON THE ROUGH- WINGED SWALLOW (HIRUNDO SERRIPENNIS), IN PENNSYLVANIA. BY WALTER VAX FLEET. I have, during two years of rather careful observation, no- ticed a constant and decided difference in the breeding and other habits of the Rough-winged Swallow, as compared with the Bank Swallow ( 'II. riparia). The main points are as follows : II. serripennis is not gregarious while nesting, but during the breeding season appears rather to avoid its kind, as well as the Bank Swallows, and to associate only in pairs. Their nesting holes are not placed near each other in the manner of H. riparia, but are scattered along the banks of creeks and riv- ers at irregular intervals, wherever an especially favorable local- ity occurs. They very seldom excavate a hole for themselves, but generally take up with any suitable cavity, and alter it to suit their taste. It is quite common to find them breeding in deserted Kingfishers’ holes, and in this case placing the nest within a foot or eighteen inches from the entrance. They will also, on finding a decayed root of sufficient size, leading in from their favorite sand banks, remove the soft punky wood, follow- ing the winding of the root, until they have arrivedat a suit- able distance — about two feet — where, after enlarging the cavi- ty, they place their nest. This species is also fond of building in holes in stone bridge piers and other masonry, near water, re- turning to the same place year after year. In the few cases which I have observed of their excavating, for themselves, it has been done in a very slovenly manner, and invariably their holes have been much larger than is apparently necessary, and round at the entrance, while on the contrary the holes of the II. riparia are very symmetrical ellipses, with the longer axis horizontal, and not larger than is needful to permit free ingress and egress of the birds. I have never yet, in this lo- cality, found a Bank Swallow’s hole large enough to admit the hand, without enlarging, while the nest of the Rough-wings can generally be reached without any trouble, except when built in masonry. In this case they will pass through a crevice barely large enough to admit their bodies, providing there is a cavity within large enough to contain the nest. 2 The Rough-Winged Swallow. [Sea Island Notes.] lil' WALTER HOXIE. Among the Sea Islands, the Rough-winged Swallow finds very convenient breeding places, and is a very regular resident, though his Spring arrival is somewhat of a movable feast, varying as my record shows, between the 21st of March and the 8th of May. If his cousin, the Bank Swallow, ever accompanies him, he certainly does not come to stay, and has never yet introduced himself to me. As soon as they get home, the Rough-wings begin to inspect their nesting sites. They scratch little hollows in the side of a sanci- bluff, and then sit around on convenient sticks and indulge in lively discussion regarding the merits of the locality. This prospecting work lasts but a few days or a week at most, and the real work of excavating the subterranean dwelling soon begins, and seems to be quite a laborious process, occupying three to four weeks. The eggs are four or five in number, oftener less than more, and average a little over three-fourths of an inch in length. A detailed account of the nesting of a pair I have watched carefully this Spring, will il- lustrate sufficiently well the above general statement. On the fourth of April. 1 found signs of scratching in a sand-bluff near my house, and a pair of Rough-wings were seen near the place. On the ninth, the hole was begun, the excava- tion being then something less than six inches. Work continued till the 21st, when a few grass roots were seen at the farther end. The meas- urements at this time were : depth, 18 inches ; width, 4 1-2 inches, contracting at the end to 3 1-2 inches; height, 2 5-8 inches. On ttie eighth of May, a set of these eggs was taken. Incu- bation begun. The nest was composed of grass roots (Joint grass), and for a subterranean structure was very compactly constructed. The front was well raised, being an inch and five-eighths high, but there was no back to speak of ; inside diameter, 2 3-8 inches. The shape was thus very similar to a nest of the Climbing Swift. As a study of “ capacities,” I subjoin the measurements of this set and their cubic con- tents both by weight and by measure. No. 1. .81 x .51 in. ; capacity by weight, 13 inches; by measure, 14 inches; No. 2. .83 x .53 inches; capacity by weight. .17 incites; by measure, 16 inches; No. 3. .80 x .53 inches; capacity by weight, .14 inches ; by measure, .14 inches. O.&O. XIII. Jane. 1888 p. ?/ 4 115 10 QUARTERLY BULLETIN. The nests of 17. serripennis are generally much more careless- ly built than those of II. riparia; they do not seem to go any distance for their materials, but appear to pick up anything suit- able which they can find within a few rods of their habitation. The nests of the two species are composed of nearly the same substances, but those of H. riparia exhibit a greater variety in the same nests, for, as they build in large colonies, they are obliged to search for materials in different places. On one oc- casion I remember finding a nest of II. serripennis composed entirely of feathers of domestic fowls. It was built in a desert- ed Kingfisher’s hole, in a sand bank, about fifteen rods from a barn-yard, in which fowls were constantly kept. At another time I found three fresh eggs lying on the bare sand ; the hole was a mere pocket, barely six inches deep. In this case the fe- male bird was probably under so great a necessity that she did not have time to construct a nest in the usual manner, but had hastily deepened the already formed cavity. I have quite frequently found fresh eggs in the nests of II. serripennis , and those far advanced in incubation ; indeed, have found fresh, nearly hatched eggs, and young birds, in the same nest, but I have never noticed anything like this among Bank Swallows, though I have searched carefully. In general habits the difference is perhaps less marked. The Rough-wings arrive here about the 10th of April, in large num- bers, full two weeks before the Bank Swallows, and are found in company with II. horreorum and II. bicolor, playing around, and chasing insects over the ponds and rivers. About the first of May the Bank Swallows come ; H. serripen- nis then appear to grow scarcer, and to desert the vicinity of ponds and streams where there are no sand banks. During the latter part of June and through July, I have often met pairs of Rough-winged swallows flying steadily in a particular direc- tion, one or another turning out to pursue an occasional insect, but when it was captured returning to its former general course, over meadows, forests and streams until lost to sight. I have thus met pairs at different times, going towards all points of the compass. As they fly quite high at these times I have never succeeded in killing both birds, but think they would prove to be male and female. About the last of August, both this species, and II. riparia begin to migrate southward, associated with the Barn Swal- lows ; when there is no perceptible difference in the habits of either. By the middle of September they have all disap- peared. Watsontown, Pa., Feb. 20th, 1876. Bull. N.O.O. I, April, 1870. p, f-//. 4 The Rough-Winged Swallow. [Sea Island Notes.] BY WALTER HOXIE. Among the Sea Islands, the Rough-winged Swallow finds very convenient breeding places, and is a very regular resident, though his Spring arrival is somewhat of a movable feast, varying as my record shows, between the 2lst of March and the 8th of May. If his cousin, the Bank Swallow, ever accompanies him, he certainly does not come to stay, and has never yet introduced himself to me. As soon as they get home, the Rough-wings begin to inspect their nesting sites. They i scratch little hollows in the side of a sana- bluff, and then sit around on convenient sticks and indulge in lively discussion regarding the merits of the locality. This prospecting work : lasts but a few days or a week at most, and the real work of excavating the subterranean dwelling soon begins, and seems to be quite a j laborious process, occupying three to four weeks. The eggs are four or five in number, ! oftener less than more, and average a little over three-fourths of an inch in length. A detailed account of the nesting of a pair I have watched carefully this Spring, will il- lustrate sufficiently well the above general statement. On the fourth of April. I found signs of scratching in a sand-bluff near my house, and | a pair of Rough-wings were seen near the place. I On the ninth, the hole was begun, the excava- tion being then something less than six inches. Work continued till the 21st, when a few grass j roots were seen at the farther end. The mens- | urements at this time were: depth, 18 inches; | width, 4 1-2 inches, contracting at the. end to 3 1-2 inches; height, 2 5-8 inches. On the eighth of May, a set of these eggs was taken. Incu- bation begun. The nest was composed of grass j roots (Joint grass), and for a subterranean | structure was very compactly constructed. The front was well raised, being an inch and five-eighths high, but there was no back to speak of; inside diameter, 2 3-8 inches. The shape was thus very similar to a nest of the Climbing Swift. As a study of “ capacities,” I subjoin the | measurements of this set and their cubic con- tents both by weight and by measure. No. 1. .81 x .51 in. ; capacity by weight, 13 inches; by measure, 14 inches; No. 2. .83 x .53 inches; capacity by weight. .17 inches; by ! measure, 16 inches; No. 3. .80 x .53 inches; | capacity by weight, .14 inches ; by measure, .14 inches. O.&o. XIII. Jane. 1888 p. f/. 115 \ 7£T ^yJy <^1 fc-~ <^KZ ~ / ^-' L~ 7 C fx^J^'OC^-^--' ^ -V ^*^4 y^JX^xX <^- <*7 a^xc <£ \xr*J^< 1«_- ^le^A 7 „ A (//CT^cyLX- . OLXX- £ ^£x-0 -7 ^J? /jz£~ a^-^cA. 7^.' dU_ tt/; v~-A5: /y/£o^6&* /I^C Auk, XII, April, 1895 , P.'*f The Rough-winged Swallow ( Stelgidopteryx serrtpennis ) and tree Swallows ( Tachycineta bicolor ) Wintering in South Carolina. — I shot a male Rough-winged Swallow on the morning of December 22, 1894, which had been in the neighborhood for over a month, and which had roosted in a barn since November. I also shot two Tree Swallows on January 4, 1895. The weather was intensely cold between these dates, the thermometer registering as low as 8° above zero. It is not unusual to see hundreds of Tree Swallows on mild days in January and February, but it is certainly surprising to find them braving a temperatuie of 8 to io° above zero. The Tree Swallows had their throats stuffed with myrtle berries, which they subsist upon in the fall and winter months.— Arthur T. Wayne, Mount Pleasant, S. C. I Amfl f. Naturalist* Vol, 10 a , Robert Ridgway here states that the Bank Swallows (p. 493) referred to in the June number are the Gotyle serripennis, instead of C.riparici, as first stated. Auk, XII, April, 1895, P* /54 \ The Rough-winged Swallow ( Stelgidopteryx sernpennis) and Iree Swallows ( Tachycineta bicolor') Wintering in South Carolina. — I shot a male Rough-winged Swallow on the morning of December 22, 1894, which had been in the neighborhood for over a month, and which had roosted in' a barn since November. I also shot two Tree Swallows on January 4, 1895. The weather was intensely cold between these dates, the thermometer registering as low as 8° above zero. It is not unusual to see hundreds of Tree Swallows on mild days in January and February, but it is certainly surprising to find them braving a temperature of 8 to io° above zero. The Tree Swallows had their throats stuffed with myrtle berries, which they subsist upon in the fall and winter months. Arthur T. Wayne, Mount Pleasant , 5 1 . C. Am ar. Naturalist* Vol, 10 a / Robert Ridgway here states that the Bank Swallows (p. 493) referred to in the June number are the Gotyle serripennis, instead of G. riparia, as first stated.