Acanthis hornemannii exilipes. I-Ioary Redpoll. — This species has been taken at Peticodiac, in the eastern corner of New Brunswick, and is considered very rare. Auk, XIX, April., 1902, p,*o/. taken till January 8, 1904, when I found one that had been taken from a flock of linaria. Another Hoary Redpoll ( Acanthis hornemanni exilipes ) at Westbrook, Maine. — On February 14, 1909, in a garden in the outskirts of Saccorappa village, Westbrook, I collected an adult male Hoary Redpoll. It was accompanied at the time by another bird, which I believe to have been of the same form, but this was not positively determined. Two and three birds had been visiting the place for several days previous to the capture, and I had become positive that one at least was a Hoary Redpoll, undoubt- edly the one secured. — Arthur H. Norton, Portland, Maine. ▲ak 26 , July -1900 ,p, yfO^ t- • TU‘ ^ cA4W vvjij ^jv. ; uj-o--» rsu*_si>-A cp-^T 0 ^- 1 - ^ V*^-^.a^ 0A_ r^r ^j^, ' ~Z© S * — f * <■**_ ^ ' l - t-X /, (x 'aY^^ S t: _£ — ^ ^a-vOaA-aJ^ jEgiothus exilipes in Massachusetts. — On the 16th of Novem- ber last, while collecting in Swampscott, I fired into a flock of JEgiothi, killing seven of the common form and one male of the light Northern race, exilipes. The occurrence of this form so far south has been noted pre- viously. Audubon, in writing of the Greater Red-poll ( JE . canescens ), mentions seeing it in Greenland, and also in New Jersey, and as found by others in Maryland. In this and in the following references JE. canescens is doubtless our form exilipes. In 1863 Mr. Samuels gives Mr. Terrill as authority for the occurrence of JE. canescens in Maine. Mr. Maynard, in his list of 1870, takes the opportunity to refuse to give exilipes specific rank, but does not state whether the so-called species exists or not in East- ern Massachusetts. In 1874 Dr. Coues, in “Birds of the Northwest,” writes that exilipes rarely if ever occurs in the United States. Dr. Brewer’s list of 1875 gives JE. canescens as rare in Eastern Maine, as I afterwards learned, on the authority of Mr. Boardman. Mr. Purdie, in his criticism of this list, seemed to doubt its occurrence ; while the last Massachusetts list, Mr. Allen’s, does not refer to the form as a synonym or otherwise. The flock from which my specimen was shot rose after being fired at, circled round and alighted on an elm close by, remaining quiet for a few seconds, then flying by twos and threes back and forth between the tree and their wounded comrade, hovering within twenty feet of my head, but, though I looked carefully, I could not see a second light bird. In this connection I may also mention a young moulting JE. linaria, show- ing no red on the head, but a slight coppery tinge above the forehead. — W. A. Jeffries, Boston , Mass. BnLL N.O.G. 4, April) 1870. P t ^ t ' S' vy exi 4*4 4 /S' / /L. fr ^ /fry ^ y , 7 ojjLy 4~-*.+. c*j/ 1 - - - /' " ' J °f '' Ir *' /frfr/) CoJjL . ft. /f *< /, • - '> ’’ '• '• fr/.M. r Acanthis hornemanni exilipes. Hoary Redpoll. — Although Red- polls ( Acanthis Unarm) were formerly occasionally common in southern Con- necticut and more rarely recorded in recent years, not until the fall of 1906 did I ever succeed in finding this species. On November 24 of that year while collecting in East Haven with my friend Mr. E. Seymour Woodruff, whose untimely death was a great and permanent loss both to his friends and to ornithology , we found a large flock of Redpolls and from it were fortunate enough to secure a single young female Hoary Redpoll, now in my collection. This is the first record in Connecticut. AOk 27. Oct -1910 P .#63. Ittf J\fn). 1 6~ ft gjtZL i'a^.u. ~J li _ U>-AAy. •^yjuet-A^-y ^^~<\ <%4 \,<^fcsLy A/J $-4^U4 L*^. ffl\A. h -tr^ lh^\j ^Wv. * 9~*^%sZ*y U^L^ZiSt £tXl U^k t Vv<- ^C4_ ^ faoiAA @£ vAts+Asy /^.<^<4, /2xJi ^ D 1^< tfokt+dYl (LcW^fiA (y%\^s.*^XCi oLa/IJ LxzJLi^+y' iX \^ ClsVWir-^<-^ /lv < Q~ ^xrw^V- ^VVx^< 'Vl i-AA ATv^- ^-c. Yl\yyy^A QAaJA frftx^AA &-4^o(a oYa-^-ka v^xk^A bAc*. ^vt^Ui ^vu^ cc-x^yj gc^a^L ( tv~^\Ac cot ~$AZ%^ jj-Xj--***. (j^Ab-vO r ^tAr(/Ci t 'bo\_£\AAo? < ^ r ^yocrAJT *soaAa/i t^tAy' AaJ 7vw^v<^i7 A, (^aA^jLaa. ' / AlaS-2ax7 ^U^tA d-n^*. tAr^AAj it^4LS /-fi-H-A, 7 ^*'A / fx -uIiaY li/uzc C^~t'''^A. >X4-/v ^ Titw tv^. jArA*4 Vj ( i~ ST ^ t> ■ /vv»-» i6 tv^vU ‘V 'VUiArV^. (\As)-ll++4 tjy^x* U^y C-w~i-y Z^~ 7^ W "Af, % \ ov-v*aS- r JX~~ jj^y-cyOi. 1* - c^rtAy/ ^a^Ca O—i^. O-Ji, cLla. Ca-p^ma $L&d>* ^ ’ C~*^-j <^» ^U-pCt^y eh-ty- Q^siyptA d Td' A /m~ % ] /^£^ vwirv ^X , //^.a A ^Ik <^ Aa l I^TZL obs) (as ^/£j fcJL (a/ZXTxaJ-tkX'J l^ijfyJ.^ c\s^ ^l/\*AK. (Tx ^ «\ /y\sss^+. s) /T'Z Qas^-A . 1 ) ~J /^^~y-^j~~*A f / ^tL> , 6 ^ -Ucz^_ C^yOL ^>Vj /y^J\ »K^, t*JXK*r~ — — A J 7 ^Aa^xJU 4 (>^rJ ' tyL ^ r ? 2 Vt. 7 l / ]A^Ut^ A . ^ 7 xA_ ^/ TA^^y T^T^T" ** °' 0 '~x~x -? Cv, <7 /^AyCyAp ixvv ? 7 /U 'A(ZZ yWx^ iTx~ ~ C 7 L Vj ^v/v"^ [^~r^s-^ — lyv-v' ^ Z^Vx. Za/VQ} £xa — vX^ ^ 7 t nk ijvvT V' W. ^ /f ^ ’ Y/f +^-vL /H. sI-^vyAA^ Z'Wrw^yy/' A_njZj ~fey. ~ 7 ^v/ (Xr^\ O -Jt-iyS t\Ju~. TvXxxvx irZTt^ 7 qJs^T^Z O- Ct-^-^-ci~ '^'-'x ^ - fZ^ 5 " T 7< ■£Cy /w XtlwTt /,$" lj/X/>-L*^ - A^-f Arwx ITyA^y M^/iw/Ok 7 « "Cp ^ cU^y ^jJL^y v-x. fivL^Z ~<7 &Uo^. {J^JyA. ^Af^AjrX, ^Cli^ fyss^-ZstJ V °y h-r^ZZ V~^~^. A-WUi*ZZ , IW YltAAxiv ZfVv / v 7 ^' e ^»- - /fft-^Iy u» I^WWI L ^ 7 ) VA^s-irw ZO^aAm-^- iv'Usi r /< ^ A> Jf : i UJ^n J-A-'- y 'v ‘•~- *X ^7 o cr^-od y CL -Cjjxjyy $v“J^rv (*^ 4 . ^TVv'^- ? jX (L Ur^*^ ^ _X ~*t 7 « u/ 7 vLa [M C‘ ^CcJl-jl fuJUy. - & j-Xolc ~yU^ d x^yy 'fyZx /h^Lf i~J Pfc X cLx j/ujXsl. ^ '/L-L ^.,-, y <._ a X Z y* ^ Av' / ^/ TTZ^ y<^ A ci 6 >y 'yj^yz A i^vl " 4 hva, .JlX-tL^y,y ^ ^ A-V ^ ' /x~x> l Xt A) VA ^-i-7 ^L\.r 6 I , ( / £ *_ v (-’ <..' ‘ ■ A /* y L V 'Xf^ &- j J ''■^^ ' ^ ^ ^ , /) tZ^AtXjXx. +* ?r1(4 A ' / y*x/\.\ r< l ^ A A XVXVv xrrxzxLj ccv Lxr^xc ^ tZ- . $ ? Z 7txA, y-XxA V XxC( I j-XJUL - C~£ j t-7 ^ . •: » K. / ^‘ ' •> Ah / '/ ^ > < / ■ / ^ -^ ' • ’ • ‘V OX 7- y 1 (Z- X ’ Z c^-t A 4, J. ^ ' //i^-,.y XfiXi /{ , A y x Xi t / < , . > A- ,; -’ *■ k' 7 , /' • v< - T Lx^xijy ^ u \y i-A X A — J- '^-Z’J t-'f 4/ LX Ol / M ^VAA? I tAsj px X > A t. ^ l ’ /;, ( y -4u | 'To / X .^ , 7TC 7-^.x^i, vl^X-^ , ■i trd/Z * X i.,_ ,j i-i/o -A .'. wA. 7 ('W 1 At 'x ) % 1 / • ( / W/ t't-trtrvyl L--y L <. jZ^- Cj ftOHv ^ ^■-•"7 xv^. ^ M yyxy J / _ . . y4X^l< czXdo r^ yyxix^i 7^' y-^X'Ux y#M > 7'^ A can tli is 1 inaria Concord, Mass. 1899. On the 6th, 8th, 9th & 11th I heard the flight calls of Red- No v. 1-11 . polls at Ball's Hill, on each occasion in the early morning. Also 21, 22 & 26. On the morning of the 7th a flock of four birds alighted near me for a moment in the top of a gray birch. As none of our other local observers met with this species during the present autumn I conclude that the flight which I noted at Concord must have been inconsiderable and of short duration (Four or five Redpolls were seen Jan. 21st, 1900 at Ipswich, Mass, by Dr . C . '.Y . To wn send and Dr . Jo s . Go o da 1 e . They sho t one wh i ch proved to be a typical 1 i nar ia J . lo Birds within Ten Miles of Point .cLe Monts, Gan, Comeau&Merriam 31 . JSEgiothus linaria. Red-poll. — Very abundant in winter, large flocks being seen nearly every day. They all seem to move in one direc- tion, following the shore westward. Bull, N.O.Q. 7, Get, 1882, p,2S6 Birds of N.E. coast of Labrador by Henry B. Bigelow. 64 . Acanthis linaria. Common Redpoll. — Very common every- where. Apparently all the Redpolls belong to this race. Ank, XIX, Jan., 1902, p.29. Acanthis linaria. Redpoll.— Both sexes of the Redpoll are much alike, the males being distinguished by the pink tinge on the feathers of the breast. They are very lively little birds, and seem to be cheerful in sunshine or storm. They feed on weed seeds as long as any weeds remain above the snow. The seeds of various trees are also eaten, such as those of the black alder and yellow birch. The writer has had the experience of watching Redpolls feed on seeds put out for them. They would feed for several hours daily, and would take fifty seeds per minute. So erratic are these birds in their choice of a winter home, that one winter they may be abundant with us and' not be seen again for years, or they may appear in autumn, pass on, and not be here again till the next winter. Auk, XIX, April., 1902, p.-W 194. Acanthis linaria. Redpoll. — Irregular winter resident, some- times abundant from November to March. Birds of Dead River Region, Me. F. H. 0. 46. JEgiotlius liniaria, (Red-poll Linnett). This species was seen only in winter. A. few came about the lumber camps in January, and remained for several days. O.&O. XI. Oct. 1886. p. 146 O ey /f . /frys'. ) ^ //n*. SMf J0L.V X. v /■ b- fttrx. dy j V /l^sCtC YA*t, (M . Xt^ly , /— , /- V J Winter Birds of Webster, N.H. by Falco. Common Redpoll, ( Aegiothus linaria). O.&O. X.Jan.l8Sf .p../* Lesser Red Poll. This bird is a common Winter visitor, arriving in November and remaining usu- ally until the middle or last of March. To-day, April 14th, I shot one, the latest I have known them to remain. The last of March, 1878, 1 was fortunate enough to find the nest and eggs ©f this species. The nest, now before me, is composed of fine dry twigs, dried grasses, fine strips of fibrous bark, bits of twine, hair, fibrous roots, moss, dried leaves, pieces of co- coons, feathers, thistle down, and other material, which is neatly woven together into a compact structure and lined with hair. It was placed very loosely among the top branches of a small spruce, about six feet from the ground, and contained three fresh eggs of a very pale bluish green color, sparingly marked with spots and splashes of different shades of brown at the larger end. Dimensions, .72X-48, .72X-47, .71X.48. — C. 0. Tracy , Tafts- ville, Vt. [We kept one of these birds in a cage for two seasons. It made a good cage bird, but was very restless in the even- ing until midnight during the Spring and Fall migration, qq and had a peculiar call during the night. It remained per- CO fectly healthy. When changing its seed, it flew through the 00 hole in the wires and went out the back door. Almost im- *3 mediately we went out at the front door, and while watch- ing the fountain play, noticed what appeared to be a bird in -sj- the water. On removing it, it proved to be the Lesser Red Poll. The bright sun and the fountain spray lured the little Northern bird to its destruction. — E d.] The Red-poll Linnet ( Acanthis linaria) is another winter visitant of whose appearance j we cannot always speak of for a certainty. In 1888 they came in large numbers, although they did not arrive until the spring months, the first being observed on March Oth. They remained in abundance during that month and April, the last ones being noted on May 1st. The winter of 1888 and 1889 did not furnish : me a note on this species, while this season they are exceedingly common. They were first seen Nov. 14, making the ex- treme dates at which I have seen them in this locality Nov. 11 and May 1. The Pine Linnet ( Spinas pinus) which generally appears in greater or less numbers, often mingling with the Red Poll, has been watched for with inter- est but has not been noted thus far. fc , T/~l . T. //. (D+ (9 ■ X V ■ Tylosis . flTtf O . ^3 . •eunr’TTTA 'O^'O */ fid* ££yi^y ^*— *- j * ^| P (#~A 3 ,JfrL. / 6 ~^jl w .. \ * /lf«ss. {near Cambridge). 2 Y^\Y tU u^y_j (U^-^c^C iy /^C e\CrT /tr- 2 Z 2242 — huict t-^xn^^e^r _ ZXir^y oto^v_ 2 e 2 < 2 ~j — ^ 3 ZL, ■ a - — *L A< ^ / o^Y uO ^vwca. d -V -Wxx /kTO-XC, 0^7 L^Z ^ //£. - A? A A-Crls-KA^ 2<:<2222 AX y~Ce 2 c 2 ^ir-i^- ASXX~_. ~Zt Ax c>& 2 ?-x ■tA}x 2 t^ / > » fc-_ o_ y^z *7 ^kX, ~^^ 2 y 4 - J -Zl-e^j^ L*t< 2 L_ 2 Ice^^. ^xx /2 ^l>-x-x^ Z( Mass. ( near Concord ). 1838 ah? 5--- ? -- '*■?. "A ft So / fe-y *y/S*~^-^t <£y fo^cZST ^tn - 7^-^e^- ^ZtJSz *^-u SS> - — Zl7~ V Sca^S /*j^c^<7 1 ^dfrdC*-+-^_ $s-*y\^yStSiy 1 -''— «. ^f^iyy^c ^ -v •y^yyy\ytZZ o/y ty-^ ^^ZZ^JL^T / A/<755. (near Concord ). 1888 AfR 5-- 7 - - ' v MASS. ( Middlesex Co.) hW A, fafttAstZ / )f /1^Z^7~Z^7 jCcAs^JL-*si-s£ ^7 zjt / ^zT^w^. ^7/ , / ' ^C^o£x^-<-^ Cr-*~^. tAJ-tLA-~jt^ ^ZZZZZ y/t e/Zjdt- C£^&0~yj^_ X}~x^J _ 7y7 ^Ayv^UA-^ A. dy '—^Z r^St-A-^Z- O-K-^/C. C^tIasT- s_ w_ Mass, (near Cambridge ). Ynl^u IX — — 7 ' ^ ^''7 l ^Av^ ^L^-4^^Vl APR 5 1PI8 APR 9 1838 /W c ^)6i. i £&+-^X. (Ja* 4 <*JLy t^_ ^ZZo-csZl* 2y & C* / 0, U^C Z>J YiyJiy r jZU-tA ^ * i\Z I 1 i. / / ^Vi) C*<-«-cj 6/ A^>-v 7 . . /^O v-c7 ^»>-e-x ^7 "^" ^ ^ZtA^ V 0 ~^^J /S<7i^. ^^j-->» ^^Ok< U 0, ■k-ZL4 iM ,itvt!% - ALL /aZcjJ ~± /stz^te* sn 1 fez, /i -^4 * ?> y. *«.t ./ <-*> ■/ * zu+^ZH. Birds of Bristol County, Mass. P. W. Andros. Acanthis linaria (Linn.), Red-poll. Winter visitant, irregular in appearance. I 0.&0. XII. Sept. 1887 p,140 Froia Basteni Mass, M.A.Frazar. lesser redpolls were here in abundance all winter, and weHeard of two mealy redpolls that were taken near by. POT, & Stria, April 24, 1800. P.2Q8 The Winter Birds in Soafiar eastern Mass. Harry G. White 17. Common Redpoll. A single bird recorded at North Truro, on December 13th. 0.& O.Vol.17, June, 1892 p.80 Acanthis linaria. A flock of ten Redpolls and one Goldfinch was observed in the Arnold Arboretum, Jamaica Plain, Mass., February 13, 1904. On March 2, 1904, a flock containing one Redpoll and thirteen Pine Finches was recorded in Brookline, Mass. _ Acanthis Shin no. 30457 in the Brewster Collection was too much mangled to be sexed. It was found on the grass under the cherry trees just north of the middle of the path leading from the arbor to the pond. It was found dead andTthe condition as stuffed. The fragment of wing attached to the shin is the only other temnant found. jle^ C&X •> //- Jj'A 'ii fot/ -n / fltMt '6‘ / - ‘Ofa^L dV | 9^1, -.93 • The Redpolls of Massachusetts.— In his ‘Revised List of the Birds of Massachusetts’ Mr. Allen includes only two Redpolls, Acanthis linaria and A. 1 . rostrata. He does not give his reasons for excluding Acanthis hornemanni exilipes , but whatever they may have been, this bird has an indisputable right to a place in our fauna. I have examined the speci- men taken by Jeffries at Swampscott, Nov. 16, 1878 (see Bull. N. O. C., IV, April, 1879, P- 121); that shot by Atkinson and recorded by Dr. Brewer (Proc. Bos. Soc. N. H., XX, 1879, p. 270); and a bird in the Cambridge Museum, to which Mr. Allen probably referred when he at- tributed exilipes to Massachusetts in 1870 (Am. Nat., Ill, p. 583), and all three are unmistakable examples of A. h. exilipes. To this number I can add the following, none of which seem to have been previously an- nounced* : A male in the collection of Mr. H. M. Spelman, taken Nov. 15, 1880, in Cambridge; a pair shot at Revere Beach, Mass., March 8, 1879, by Mr. Foster H. Brackett, and now in the collection of Mr. Charles R. Lamb; a pair killed at Revere Beach, March 9, 1883, by Messrs. Spelman and Chad- bourne, the former of whom has the male, the latter the female ; and a male shot at Nantasket Beach, Feb. 22, 1883, by Matthew Lucas, Jr., and in the collection of the present writer. All of the males just mentioned are in gray (immature ?) plumage. Besides the forms above referred to, a fourth occurs, at least rarely, in Massachusetts. This is Acanthis linaria holbcellii Brehm, of which I have two examples,! shot together at Swampscott, March 26, 1883; both are males, one in gray plumage, the other a rosy-breasted adult (?). Thus of the five Redpolls attributed to North America at large four have been found in Massachusetts. Of these A. linaria visits us in abun- dance, but of course more or less irregularly ; A. rostrata in smaller numbers, but still plentifully at times, as in February, 1883 (see Bull. N. O. C., Vol. VIII, pp- 95-99, recorded as rEgiothus linaria holboelli ); A. h. exilipes in very limited numbers, and perhaps even less regularly than either of the two preceding; while A. 1 . holbcellii is apparently the rarest of the four and possibly a mere accidental straggler. The fifth North American form, Acanthis hornemanni typica, has never been taken within the limits of the United States. As the recent shifting of names in this group is somewhat confusing it may be well to explain, that the AEgiothus linaria holboelli which I re- recoided* from Massachusetts in 1883 is the Acanthis linaria rostrata of the A. O. U. List, and the Acanthis linaria holbcellii, now for the first time reported from our State, another and very different form, much more nearly like true linaria, from which it can be distinguished only by its greater size and longer bill. Those who care to look further into this subject should consult Dr. Stejneger’s able papers on the genus Acanthis. f — William Brewster, Cambridge, Mass. [The omission of Acanthis hornemanni exilipes from my ‘Revised List’ was due (1) to the fact that the then latest authorities on this group did not recognize exilipes as occurring south of “ Arctic America and North- eastern Asia”; (2) in view of the recent radical shifting of names, and the supposed not wholly trustworthy identification of at least some of the specimens of ‘exilipes ,’ referred to above as recorded from Massachu- setts, the omission of this form was thought to be the safer course, es- pecially as the alleged specimens were not then accessible to me for examination, — J. A. Allen.] Auk, 4, April 1887. p. /£,?-/<£>■/, ’ t Dr. Stejneger has kindly examined them and confirmed my determination. * Bull N. O. C, VIII, pp. 95-99. t Auk, 1 , 1884, pp. 145-155; ibid., IV, 1887, pp. 30-35, — £? t. , . /I — •y Atzdu "y For, & Stria, April 24, 1890. p.2 Q8 f II 01 '- recently large flocks of Red Polls. ^,% /coy/' Acanthis linaria linaria. Redpoll. — Several flocks of from twenty- five to fifty birds were observed each week from December 25, 1916 to February 12, 1917. They were usually feeding in high, weedy fields on the edge of woods, but were sometimes grouped in the maple trees at the edge of the field, and on several instances on the lawn around the house. They have never been so common in this vicinity before to my knowledge. I think I have not seen more than half a dozen Redpolls before this in Stamford in the last twenty years. Aak, 24, Apr. ,1907, p. / $ $• Notes on certain birds of Long Island, New York. By William C. Braislin, M. D. AcantMs linaria. Lessee Redpoll. — Never having previously observed the Redpoll on Long Island, it was with pleasure that two were seen in Prospect Park, Brooklyn on March 5, 1907. The two, observed at close range, were even less timid than the common English Sparrow, as I came within little more than a yard’s length of the nearest. They found something to pick at on the snow mounds at the edge of the walk, and as they flew I was interested to note the similarity of flight and call-notes to those of the Goldfinch, for which I might easily have mistaken them under less favorable conditions for observation. w Birds of the Adirondack Region. C. B.Merriaiu. 5S. iEgiothus linaria (Linn.) Cabanis. Common Redpoll. — Wir ter visitant from the north and more or less irregular. Ball. N. O. a, Q, Oct, 1881 , p, 220 I Saw flocks of Les- ser RedpoRs on Dec. 5th and 6th. cl* fa- 'tf* CT&O. Vlll. Mar. 1863. p.-M' W^^jm^e^^of^spring. O N Feb. 8 this locality was visited by a large flight of the common redpoll. They were in very large flocks, and accompanied a snow' storm which swept through the Chemung *V alley on this date. I had about a dozen fine specimens brought to me by a young man who fired into a flock that was feeding near the house. This first called my attention to them, and on going out I was surprised | to find them all over. A very few snowflakes were also seen among some of the flocks. Yesterday, while on my way to church, I saw a red and buff -shouldered blackbird. He was all alone in the top of a dead tree, and his notes reminded one of spring. He looked very lonesome. Elmira, N. Y„ Feb. 10. E. A. S. WinteT Notes fromStephentown, N.Y. • Benjamin Hoag. It is with great pleasure that I record the presence of Redpolls in considerable numbers. Not a single specimen was noted last season, while in the fall of 1889 they commenced to arrive in large flocks about the 15th of November, and were here in multitudes all winter, staying un- til late in the spring of 1890. O. & O.Vol. 18, Jan. 1898 p.ll ? *) V t* F*. o CL o> Ph - -*a> CL CD S* -is 03 o _ o 2 b £ f - < W ? Z . T3 T3 ' £ 3 o L2 -d O NO s o $ 3 •-3 e 03 u ■« n A.lt’niex* and Melanism in North American Birds* Rutixven Deane, A speci- men of A. linaria was recently captured, whose plumage was white, with the exception of the crimson patch on the crown. Bali. N.OtO. 1 4 April, 1876, p.2l 9-H i 4. iEgiotlms linaria. Common Redpoll. — In his list of the birds of the Magdalen Islands,* Mr. Cory included this species “with great hes- itation,” a single specimen, so badly mangled that it could not be positively identified, being the only one which came under his notice. Mr. Fra- zar, however, found it abundant on both Amherst and Grindstone Islands where many large flocks were seen feeding among the spruces. Owing to lack of time and the pressure of other duties he secured only two speci- mens. but as these are both in first plumage the breeding of the species there may be considered assured. The following description is taken from the younger of the two examples just mentioned. Juv., first plumage {$ , Magdalen Islands, June 29, 1S82. M. A. Fra- zar). Entire plumage of the head and body, excepting the throat, cheeks, and abdomen, thickly and coarsely streaked with dull black on a pale ochracehus or brownish-white ground; tips of the greater and middle wing-coverts with the outer edges of the tertials, ochraceous-white ; throat black; cheeks brown ish-ochraceous ; center of the abdomen brownish- white and immaculate; no red on the vertex. Bull N. O.O, 7 , Oot, 1882, p. 5 ~. IaHLI 717. Lesser Red Poll . (. Adgiothus linaria'). By C. O. Tracy. Ibid., p. 47. — “Nest and eggs of this species” found “the last of March, 1878,” at Taftsville, Vt. ! The species was doubtless the Pine Finch ( Chrysomi - Iris j) intis ) . O.VoLVIII ? The Redpoll Breeding on the Magdalen Islands.— It may be of some interest to know that a nest of a Redpoll ( Acanthis linaria) was found on Grosse Isle, Magdalen Islands, this year by Mr. H. H. Hann and the writer of this note, while on a short trip to the Islands in June of this year. It was the day before we left Grosse Isle that the nest was found, and most of our belongings were packed for our homeward journey but nevertheless we decided to spend this last day, June 29 , on the hill a little to the east of the settlement. About one third the way up this hill, amid the spruce trees, we discovered a small nest in a spruce about six feet from the ground. It was placed near the trunk of the tree and was a dainty affair, neat and rather compact, composed of coarse grass and a goodly quantity of deer moss lined with feathers, about three and one half inches in diameter, and containing four young birds four or five days old. After we had waited there for some time both parent birds returned to the nest. There was no mistake in the identification of these active little birds, with their dark throats and red foreheads, the male with a conspicuous red patch on his breast. It might also be of interest to note that the Scaup Duck ( Aythya marila), found quite abundantly on the Magdalens by both Rev. C. J. Young and the Rev. H. K. Job, on their visits to the Islands, were this year no where to be found and the islanders could not account for their sudden disap- pearance. — J. P. Callender, Summit, N. J. ‘fusfe, XX111, Jar.., 1906, p 3 The Lesser Redpoll. W. E. Brooks on the Genus Acanthis.— Mr. Brooks, the well-known Indian Ornithologist, now living in Milton, Ontario, has recently contrib- uted to ‘The Ibis’ two papers* on the Redpolls, especially the American species. The final result to which Mr. Brooks has arrived, he gives as follows: “We have, then, five very well-marked species of Acanthis, viz. A. hornemanni , A. exilipes, A- rostrata. A. linaria, and A. rufescens ; also one doubtful bird, A. linaria kolbcelli." Of this latter he says : “To me it is not a thoroughly satisfactory species, like the others, but at present its long bill is not easily accounted for. I am not partial to the trinomial system, but for convenience’ sake this bird might stand a.s Acanthis linaria kolbodli. It is a variation not yet thoroughly worked out.” The present reviewer, who, on an earlier page of this number of ‘The Auk,’ has attempt- ed to put this form on a satisfactory footing, feels quite satisfied with this admission of Mr. Brooks, who, it must be remembered, is an opponent of the theory of evolution, and to whom a form must be a ‘full species or nothing. On the other hand it is very gratifying to find one's views in regard to so difficult a group as the Redpolls shared and sustained by an ornithologist of so great power of discrimination as Mr. Brooks, whose statements the present writer is glad to indorse in most cases. Ihe dif- ferences of opinion between Mr. Brooks and myself relate directly to the question of ‘species or subspecies,’ or perhaps ‘binomials or trinomials,’ differences which, in fact, are quite unessential.— L. S. / Auk, 4, Jan., 1887* P* ' * Stray Ornithological Notes. Ibis, 1885, pp. 380-389; the portion relating to Acanthis on pp. 381-385. Additional Notes on the Genus Acanthis. Ibis, 1886, pp. 359 - 364 - BY ARTHUR H. LOCKETT. The interesting, and hardy little bird, corres- ponds in Winter to the Goldfinch in Summer, but is a little larger than the Goldfinch, and with more modest colors. The male wears a beautiful rose colored vest, with a modest black tie just under his chin. His swallow-tailed coat is striped brownish gray and white, but the handsomest part of his outfit, is a beautiful crimson skull-cap, which is also a weak- ness of his wife’s, but she does not wear red in any other part of her costume. They are very irregular in their movements, some years appearing at one time, some years at another ; common one Winter and few or none to be found the next. Last year they came and went late, not arriving here (Exeter, ' 1 ST. H.,) until the first week in March, and leaving about, the middle of April. They were in very large flocks, and wandered incessantly in search of food. When on the ground they are very easily start- led, but on the other hand very easily re-assured ; taking to the trees or bushes at the slightest sound, but in a second or two back again picking up seeds as before. Their note is very peculiar, for the note or rather chatter of one bird sounds like that of a great many. In the latter part of March I caught a well marked female, and tamed it, which was very easily done, and found it a very pretty little pet. It never disturbed me by loud notes, as at times a canary does, but sitting on the top of its cage, would chatter as if talking to itself for an hour at a time, and I could shut my eyes and imagine that I heard a whole flock of these happy little creatures, hopping about on the crust of the snow, fulfilling the duty for which God created them. o . & o. XI. Jan. 1C86, p. 6 >. * 2 Transactions Canadian Institute, III, 1891-92, 29. (3/ cAcLXJ (yS^/^rzArx^X C CX/v-l. £S* ^ /i/. * ^ *_ //* - ' /«. . ^ _l/1/l ^ ‘ ^ . A^aaah ^ ^ct- >.' ^ KAaV «AUH ^ 2 t*. ^ ^ ^ 4 o^, /v >/ ^t-A A » mm ~~^ ^*A- y/t*AAty / /C*>JL»^_^ /z 7 c Hl / 7 * r d%Z f C 7 &dC' £?Xl#. ^L^J, , sZU^t+y ^gdd 7 f 7 U^-’ . / 0 , /ffd (j7^<- TicZ^c /^/?/z 7 cw K ^Xa^c-c '^ru-r^- Si^o-ty) e^v £ i***. "fal . ^ c ’’ Lr ^*~ c ^ t ? fcUu. ^ ^ X'zC- j „P nv ., (//- A , _ X A j^eccA. c^t^- f^nr^crusneJS r ti^yuid^iA. / ]f^yydudyv di^tcl. a^y- 4U7 ^ TUc^tA to ry^ d dvdU^y- \ ddy ^uo l^d- d ^ f^ 4 - * 4 - ^ -^y- dyu 4 ^*-^s. £7X1*. ^ ^ . /O, /frfd '- /?-, /*? f e^&£- y Jz-thC\j 6y fayj.^ Clc !U^j fruM- fUiT/. 3 j 5 ( hit™ ■l/'Cj'~t-\A. Lfr^-frAA. 1 --lA_^/ /xAf- ^ ^^L-C*aa.A^\^'aaa. ” i^AAi'Sj fry fix-JL j u .i t Ms 3 ^xAAZZl^ S~J^f ^^aaa^ kj 7%Z*> J 4A^Ca^ (U*aA~aMC l'J~is\-A^CjL+^ t aJ\Aa- >.^AA^AxAA - jft tA. AA-'M s Afrj A^r fr/f/tt, /aaA4AA-X < J 0^v/l JV o—^yC $7 ^A-ka W / isLs t Mo Ja«* ,\ v'oi. 0~yj (>a- fa]A/\ t \J t (p-jvjiXi (*i LAv\ _ ^ ^ i,'X\, 6 ^iy -v-'v. ^ * ’{ j>,A { f r OX. ^ t^.-c^^'x [tfaAir ^ (X, * ^ lfr~' y A/y Ar*fa tf\r Ov ! -X I/ffrxA) frfr &SAA. V vr 7 7^ KUuma- /tLyU-n. , y/ (7-, /^. /^jt Ajzx 3o / lb-nj !%% I have the pleasure of informing the lovers of Ornithology in our state that, on Dec. 30t.h, 1896, I took a specimen of the Greater Redpoll Aoauthis linaria rostrata (Coues) in Gar- diner. The presence of this bird among us had been suspect- ed before, but no record of its actual occurrence has ever ap- peared. The skin was submitted to VVm. Brewster of Cam- bridge, Mass., President of the A. 0. U., on whose decision I feel authorized in making known my discovery. Wm. L. Powers. ^ )m»i*vc. tv<. — .V2 ; fo6./Vf 7, !•■')) V friAAJUxj^iL 3S iy riN, 95?U^y. ro~ cf~, ( ( .'S CK^ri 0~A,**''t,>*~. i ,9. 7 'f, i? f> 196. Acanthis linaria rostrata. Greater Redpoll.— Occurs among flocks of linaria, but is rare; I have seen about a dozen well marked local specimens taken between November 9 and February 10. _ „ , Auk, XIV, Apr. . 1897, p.2/9. Two New Birds for Maine. — The United Ornithologists of Maine report the occurrence of two birds new to the State. The February num- bei the ‘ Maine Sportsman,’ their official organ, published in Bangor, leported the taking of a Greater Redpoll, Acanthis linaria rostrata at Gardiner, Dec, 30, 1896, by Win. I,. Powers. The bud was shot from a flock of Lesser Redpolls, and the skin sent to Mr. Wm. Brewster, Cam- bridge, Mass., for identification. The March number contains the account of a number of skins collected in the winter of 1878-79 by James Carroll Mead of North Bridgton. Mr. Mead was with Mr. Powers when the Greater Redpoll was captured, and on returning home and inspecting his collection, he deemed it wise to submit them to Mr. Brewster, who identified one as the Acanthis linaria holhoellii , which decision was afterward ratified by Mr. Robert Ridgway of the Smithsonian Institution. — Wm. L. Powers, Gardiner , Me. ^u^^jyC- a/h. yf ^V faTtA^-t-^. ZfaTTc^^ Jh-x) , \ £b< , /k7jr , °-^ -Jdc^U, /s~ / /'t')j <-s x J __ z 1 ^ &s 7 ~ v-r- & '* * H. C f- Co Cd . / 3 *.m“:/U ¥ zj*.‘ z 7 - w / fix £ Uj- 'f- £ 4 . £?• &»*, ^4 <£<*. £V C< QgAJiL. s%jo l-K a 7 w -- M- V V/m i!*ji i *JS$J*fj'Z%/7%*3?$ j, it. fa a^. id. <*“: -4jr^ v „ ✓/. id. A. ' ««• -tf,. i. 4 JzZX&vf' fa fa. WK /v V - «- 1 . «i /^. 3 pCP 3 \ z* c l v I Wo % , ii, *, 6 ,t f * *■ 4 Vu Jfio. ^ A, A. »?• fa fa ^LV. , 2 ?i : ^./ Iv^y JMo ?ru. tfd. < * 7 @ /o^ / 3 z - ; . ~ 7 lf ^ # 7 / j©_ /jr£o iviizr^Jf^ nn. / 3 ®~ I'm . MU % z\ %J T s% U w«~t " vu. a, M - ?• fa- 1 * 4 cd~H-y 4 c.- 1 . //" n* io‘* i/* c^ji J^jLj /• 3~ 7- ' /^ ' /v>"4 /&* ^ ^ - ■ 3a k ^y^t- ZL^r /i^; /3*/vWS'/7-'JzlZ3^ - Sepr . 4 ^ 7 ^ //^ ZifTrm @&U 2' 7+1 7^ ^ f 7/2— /7/^ /? s J./ 1 TiZ- 23- 2^ 27 Q 3/ ^Zju 3^ r /3± /r / 7 ~ 2 . tZifad* iji \fn /m. c. /J® XZIXX /@ /4^. / 'df) /o * z) *- Is o -x X- '/- 'ScXIxas^x^'*. ' Cor^viC _. (V (•7-4.£.^ 1 ( sS^ ii^ u> * / ; rS7 7 Lc ~ k\^- cA-. /^ 5 vA ^ cuc^- — , 3 ojAsi . ^c^k a, £i 3 7 *: ft /v / 7 - U^’ Wvw4a 3 - 4@ 6 - // - /3- /V- /A* 4 * - fl® II ® j? £<5£> /*.# CJ~ !(c /m — cw, J dyn^M ^ 3 ^-- ’ /V'.T^w- • ? ^ / Cp'Wsjv-i t/ ^>r &TV->r''-«l- /' '^^ / ■■■■-'- jj i 1 1/ { ji / f >' ••■//:• t /.^ , A 'V^ vy 4 ;v * / }- * /«^p •;- j -/.3- vr C*,.Wr&, ^ -$®f •*■//& /z **. /i ^ z/^' jl. Cu^ 1 ,^ 1 ^- 11 ^- 1 ^' 10 & C*y- ¥■ T ^T ^ at e->~ j.c** =a- 3 ^ k-io^V is^rr-ite a.r o^-vT fys&sx^Kj ( PuoM^ S& /i£- $/£/i;a> /^ ^ Ct lw_w. A**- 6 ^' *?& H^Z/^-Xi 1 CU^^JL ir*£ frZb. 1 ^ c i- , . - ?■ ixLitoi Hk cJl ^ ? i << 3 ( j iL^'d.^ , h^M G. - R. Ci , SubM-i / ^ O O ~Pha,leA*. //I 3/ X 33-» 7% //& 373?? 3o << t G-x //‘j- 1*/ 1 * /S'* /6 -x !7& /B x ju® zzx Xf'* 3.6* 3lfJ Omj, h /3b. //a 3.06. 2.3& 3^6. 3i't. 3 9 ® 3 o' 1 3 3 37 / / 1 &U\ 4 8 H /% 6 /a ■%% ^3/' TTyi . / w //4S7~ -?7 J ^ 0) ) o-^j /# 7-x 2 f 43 / /£ 6 * 3/x 33* 3 L /k 3$j £ -V # S-i l ’.£ J J- 9& /&£■ //£//>'£ 3$# 3?J?3o.p /7V' i$ 7 jv 4 /s /o l ‘V w 7° ' ^/o^/-/ 3 /?'/^ ZY 3 3S-*^6' 2.J 3 {Z-u^olaZT /' X.‘ 3 3 S'6 V ? 3 /o* /7 A3 I /4/4 /6 { ' 3° Z 3/^ zZ 3Y 3 ZJ 3 3$' -3 f 3 3 ° z 3/' cS elXZ^J^. v / 7 77^ 7 77/ 7 77// 3/-? S ■'/6 J /7*/9' f /9**o' s *f*Z3' 37 3 C0cr^6e-x y^yfj^ 1 u4^4 /fo^ zz* ~h<~< 7 % ?i /c V uk /sjrhvi /sj? >^z 2 39 ^ 3 % ' V H 3 3***$ /o' //'* zsl z6, 4 ju*4i$ J?8$* zyio 34 /^ yj,^. 7 7/;, /2>k /3.* ( 47^7/ /7| Z / ^ • Z 3 ?oJ 7 V ' Z&Z 7.; Jo ' J/ ?* • 6'cIa^J^ / ' .2 7 3 - l c jol ^oaJL z 4 £44jl 39 I l 2.2%* x^, v *£ ""7? 7^ n 7 g * /.7 & /4 i- /■>-;. Cfch)‘7ir»i 3.0* 3/x 33 X -?3V< 39* 3S*. 32 » 3? » A-7 -^s~* .*<7- *7# 3$ #3$$ 4)£'jx7juZ j4.x. < /‘~ > ^ 4 /z 13 3o^ J^fc^ 1^ zfrl It 7 /i 3.4 £7 7 / £>7 // a - ^ u '/3,;.;o7/' n^ ^ a - ll^^r Q^wc /^ 1 1 k^- 1114. : /y-^ /<»«%»■ ii-t^-jjLk 1 31*f. is<4y4 2^^- 3 0 ^ -tL^. u f 7^I /L/l- 37 ^/ ~ J 2. /j ^-v /-/» 7.1^ 3 -1 ^ 6i )o% 3o ~, : : 3Zs 33x U L %**. /?* "f . *« ,...,! . / ^ **-./. S' ~ . i / 3 * b. u 27 14 CUy^jr Z:* 6'k ^ IPSt //@) RJJ. Ov». V-A^»- AxJL- /< /fc ?r /# / YO fl/o l7‘tW*Hl QJ^-Z^ n'*t^ S/4^ /O 0 d> t.3cfA.M. £-/* jh Z3(hy$> 3o# 4 l<.U^ h 3 4$) '3 ^ sv** 4 7 zy du^Lz 7# 7^ 37 74 /yi 7 //4^. /34^o / 7 XZ^JL^Ui 16$ St^ZZ-U I'b'p (b4cz^ /Uyvt^l^ -£> M Z/'4J® S. Z/x^aZ/Z mf JW* ! t jg™ y S /6' h (/ __ T^z- Art.^yf Sv z - ^/^-y y C L- t—4^ io^iL^ t^l 4vJ^*StZ~ (& l^t,-tVL ^ ' - V. ^ ’ /'L^-cA^- 2> a^.'^h $~-' — ^ ^i) Z 7 ^ ^ <77 1.1 / y , ^ Zvlv-o /^v-^v- &c^v T^^xZc ca>-c.w/' ^ C-77e>^^' t^x ^y r \_,3^\. P''l/ISL^^. y^LC^'i V C'yyj'U Iaj ^ ^ 7'/lzX^ C- , ~7AlA)~^~r~J flixA*. C4S\^ 1/JZ^vZx ^ C I^Ix^ai CiJ^vCZZx. /?te6-(h A-y/ 'A# y ^*VvA/ I'X'iy/'^XAVAy A^-\a •^jyzy h /, Hjrir-f u/ - y 777i7ca. ^ Z ' -f f v J. / /i ^ f/\ 1 ( V / , J /Z?, ~nZc Uo . J d- "D L\^d^t ftUsKy (ty 'ftlAx, $A' i ^* A ''l *-/ C^A' X i Iaj l'-*- -' /. z ^\a- 'j^y ~^ V (/ A £AZ 'Of/l-y- tvv /7’ ^ Z-IA-M ly-3d Maa. , dy, -M^-la L\^C XK ^ ~p^ / Ciii 7c. V tdd^x flu. ih /f7- 7 ' vwt ^ v - y -'.^-'V f Cr ' ’ ^ / W ; ^ , . ( / ^ / J \ \ ( ^ l s. l*t(L Ifcy 7 t 7tn t C . _ ^ y^dc ^ t~, idydA- ')aia_^k dby. u.y a^^iaUa^^ i/ 3^ A ^‘ 17J -VIA -yZLiL S-iH-ilL) 7vn jjAsUA- A-A-0-X. . ^'o-i / ^<-^ /.V'^ y tAKA^] {pLx--Xy ^ iaa, t A-^, L^tyA/vy/^AAyiL^^ Av j/^Mt fvi . V flxy --a H\jy 3x0/ ZO /ftfo y^Z-AAS)^ £*> t^A^- 4 ^CZ^ ^ 0 \S\ /iw, / 3-0— yC (^CUv TM 00 ~*S\AA-' ^ 3 ZuxaA, fZ-vt? ZA/l v~x> 'UNaA 'tO tPCs-LA^y, ttl, JL* &~oa. ^ 0 ~ZxaaaO r/\As^ A\AS/hZZ,<< 0 ' $T 5 ~^*aa- ^XA^^yOOy~\/\hA/^ ~J'o< jLMy , f/-L-X^\s G/ 0 ~14/8 'Vvu-vl/ ~fttZZ\^, LA^A^ 3 ZZ\yx^ / / / cx- ysy / ifc Cy-tOL 33-tCi /. yjOA.' UJ-oOU- cx. J\JuC-asO_/^ OyoyOw O Mask, &Zx{^ laa )1aj^a^^ 3Z> IAa^ fl-xA^A. ^Aat^ajaa. //Z *A-j^ Ox. ^ZocAAjtxA-x-yfl cOZZZZaZ p ^ ajZa- cZa/~ 1 -a- Oi_ jj-Otir~\AJ~-v^v^ 3fe: Zx K ~xA. JLxIa* (yOxAxttZtCy (1 ^%^ /\x>^ Zit\^ .y /i- ^_ t, AA-.. ^e/. — 3- (j-^\~vCj y yxoi ^y>t A . ^ , X^ / /; ,.• i~ ^-v_^ aA^^m.^ ^s{~ ^_o^--/ ^*'»_ /Q~lA (T^aa. Ok, t~~f -«- ( jOa!^ajA' ^ OcA^ty Of y ' r- / O, yA^~ef/ 11 Copied 1 ro.m Jo urn a St> inns trist is Peterborough, New Hampshire. 1898. Very ooramon and generally distributed. Although several July 5 pairs of birds were evidently breeding near the house and con- to Aug. 15. stantly under observation I heard the full song only a few times during my stay (July 18*, 20*, 30*, Aug. 4.*, 6.*). I have satisfied myself this season that W. Deane is cor- * rect in his contribution (of 0si>rev, Vol.2, no. 3, llov., 1897, P . 41 ) that the summer flight call of the Goldfinch (i.e. the \ per-CLhicoree ) invariably begins just as the bird opens its wings after reaching or slightly passing the lowest part of its curve. It ends invariably with the completion of the up- ward curve. In other words the downward sweep is always per- formed in silence. What is the meaning, by the way, of this galloping flight with its accompanying perchicoree (I should render this call per-chee-chee - chee ) call? It appears to be peculiar to the male and to be performed only in the breeding season; yet the true song and the bird's manner of flight, while singixig, are wholly different. si Concord, Mass. 1899. Bov .1-11 Also 21, 25 & 26. Sn inus tr ist Is . The minis t ahead le flight call of this species was heard almost daily from October 13th to November 11th usually in the early morning. Judging by the evidence of my ears alone (I did not once see any of the birds ) the Linnets were roving about over the country singly or in small parties, but on October 25rd I heard the confused clamor of what must have been an exceptionally large flock. f Birds of Upper St, John, Batohelder. 4 z. Astragalinus tristis {Linn.') Cab. Goldfinch. Common. Though somewhat beyond the limits of my subject, I quote the following from Mr. McLeod's notes : “This winter [1876-77] they have been abun- dant, although the seas.on is very severe. I have seen them at this time of year but once before.” The Goldfinch has been supposed not to winter north of Massachusetts. Ball. N.O.Q, 7, July, 1882. p,147 Birds "within Ten Miles of Point de Monts, Can, Comeau &Mernam 34. Astragalinus tristis. American Goldfinch. — Rather rare. I saw a small flock in July, 1882. Bail* N.0.0* 7, Got* 1882, p t 23t Goldfinch, plentiful. O.&O. XI. May. 1686. p. I 6 1 11, Goldfinch, O.&O. XI. Mar. 1886. p, Summer Bde. Restigouche Valley, N.B, July, *88. J. Brittain and P. Cox, Jr. Spinus tristis. American Goldfinch. — Occasionally met with near settlements. Auk, Yl. April. 1889. p. 118 'SQnixn©!* Birds ss* j, ° ot - 529. American Goldfinch. Common. Oi&Qi XV, JUS»,1Q9Q, p,88 Dwight, -Summer Birds of Prince Edward Island. Spmus tristis. American Goldfinch.— A few seen almost daily. Auk X, Jan, 1893. p.li S'*/ Newfoundland Notes.' A Trip up tie Humber Hirer, Aug. 10 - Sept. 24, 1899. 35 . Spinus tristus. American Goldfinch. — Their characteristic note heard on several occasions, but none seen. Louis H, Porter, New York City. Auk, XVII, Jan., 1900, p .'JZ. ^ ' i •- ' ^4- I vi’p S ^ S-e-o-c-—. V ~yj Xjx* lYY) (Jjn~^ //. ypi^cnn-^' S c-CA t , X V/// t /, /*. 2o ( l /, 7 ^^ C?.y64^/ ( /€^: Xx/ , / t J"/ *4 40. Astragalinus tristis. American Goldfinch. — Regularly met with about the partially cleared sections. f2^Aa ^frur2Xo^ C o^aajxxL 198. Astragalinus tristis. American Goldfinch. — Resident,' abun- dant in summer and sometimes in winter, though I do not think the same birds are resident in summer and winter; breeds (July 23-30, 1893). Septembeb Eggs. — Sandford Ritchie, White’s Corner, Me., reports finding five fresh eggs of the A merican Goldfinch, Sept. 5th. 0.&o. vii. Dec. iaei7f - nrY* f-— — Birds of Dead River Region, Me. F. H. C. 47. Astragalinus tristis, (American Goldfinch). Observed in all portions of the counties, but more common in the cleared tracts than in the iorests. They were common at our camps at Tim Pond. I was too early for their usual time of nesting, which occurs in July, as elsewhere in New England. O.&O. XI. Oct. 1886. p. 146 i SnmmerReaidents on Southwest Qoast of Mains, T.H, Montgomery, Jr, 529. American Goldfinch. Abundant at Boot hbay. Oj in-iO, is* Nbv.1890. P.ioa Shelburne, N. H. Aug. 8 - 29 - 1805 . R. D, t (\ aJlZ*14 - _ 'ff&i. < s*-y K^- Ry» Beach, N. H. 1806^885. ~ y J OU^x a, x3 _^ im Rve'Beachjl^H-Aiay 23-24 1885. ~ X ' //6 Lma 44 +*~jMi* Oa^ / (/ {*a*4ao^~-. 7^^". -3/*“' - ' > / /W I. Birds Obs. at Moultonboro, N . H. July2i-Aug.il, 1883. F.H. Allen Spinus tristis. — Common. Auk, VI. Jan. , 1589. p. 78 Winter Birds of W ebster/N . H.by Falco. Goldfinch, ( Astragalinm tristis). O.&O. X.Jnn too = Summer Birds of Presidential Range, Bua w£taMta. A.P.Ohadbourne at an altitude of about 3 ° 5 ° f ee t* Amk t 4, April 1887. p.105 Bds. Obs. in Franconia, N • _H -L 1 11-21. '80, and June4-Aug. 1, 87. W-faxon 31. Spinus tristis. American Goldfinch. — Common. Auk, V. April, 1888, p.152 Birds Obsvd. near Holderness, N.H June 4-12, ’85, and4-l 1 , *86. W. Faxon 25. Spinus tristis. G01.DFINCH.-N0t common. Auk, V. April, 1888. p .150 Birds Obs. at Bridgewater, N.H. Julyl2-S*pt. 4, 1883. F.H. Allen Spinus tristis — Common. Auk, VI. Jasu. 1889. p. 77 Bds. Obs. at Franconia and Betluehem N.H. July -August, 1874 . J.A.Ai 22. Spinus tristis. Common. Auk. V. April, 1888. p.154 Bird Notes, Central N.H. Winter ’91-951 J. H. Johnson American Goldfinch, plenty first part of winter. 0.&O.Vol.l7,May 1892 p. 72 Breezy Point, Warren, N.H» 1894 . •i i G Breezy Point, Warren, N.H. I 1895. IYojA . cvv Aj „ . ? " v /<-/ // t o^'s 0/ ju *,3 AV it, /* *■ 3 y * x * .* v, " Z 7 -lb@Z 9 *- 77 . . i .. „ $w 4 m. 'S v~tetLtAA.fl /X-^M ./^V.^- Summer Bd s.M t. Mansfie l d, Vt l 36. Astragalinus tristis. American Goldfinch. — Common in Stowe Valley. Auk, XVIII, Oct., 1901, p .34Z /n/ 'kJ X. li £\sis&CCl Mass. ( near Cambridge). 1887 Ofv^u 6- M<7ss. {near Ca?nbridge). Ik'd 7 k' 4w. f * 20* 4^.4 1. A3-. //*V L°y, Pl- 23 .fr: 7wX> .. 1/— -Z*. — . /ti^ Z^Xcx. t^TK/^. Great id. ^ at IcL M^sTp^e. 188 F — +>-^itUaMA&stsait4jxJ * IXj.J. _ „ a.* ?* . /W Maes. Mass. ( near Co?icord'). 1888 APR 5^ /i- W. Middlesex Co. Mass. June 25-30, 1889. S^Jotri^A b^c’x CJ i * 6 st To #n send, Ashby , Mt. W atatic— — — Rather common, but nowhere numerous, Goldfinches. Sfi (SYlslsC/ 4 (yx^A-'CZ,^ Waverly, Mass. Goldfinches are pretty plenty (heard them sing this mornine) Walter Faxon (letter January 13 , 1391 )„ /tft: JUy /y* /6 /I Fall Migration, Brist®l County, Mass. 1885. Charles H. Andros. .Goldfinches were | noted, O.&O. XI. Jan. 1886. p.^ Fali Migration, Brist©' County, Mass. ! 885. Charles H. Andros. . (P; - 1 dissected a Goldfinch and found the stomach to contain small milky seeds, probably from the fir cones, on which they are at present feeding to a large extent. O.&O. XI. Jan. 1886 .™ , JL. &>. COM, '-cCl^c/, Goldfinches, o.&o.xi-'w [a ‘s r * 1886, ' p ' 77 Birds of Bristol County, Mass. F.W. Andros. Spinus tristis (Linn.), American Goldfinch. Resident, common. Breeds. O.&O, XII, Sept. 1887 p.I40 Birds Known to Pass Breeding Season nr. winchendon, Mass. Wm. Brewster 36. Spinus tristis. Auk, V, Oct., 1888. p.389 Bds. Oh t. neir Sheffield, Berkshire Oy, Uui June 17-36. '88. W. Faxon 3 1 ' Spinus tristis. American Goldfinch. — C ommon. Auk, VI. Jan., 1889. p. 44 Bd». Obs. near Q»*yloc< Mi Berkshire Co. Mass. June 28“ Jury 1C. W, Faxon 27. Spinus tristis. American has been cleared of the forest. Goldfinch.— Common where the land Auk, Tl. A$Til. 1880. p.lGO ^riA. syutAsi & Cf,.yQ, — — several sets of A merican Gold Finch. — J. M. IF., JVoank, Conn. O.&O. VII. Oct. 1882. p, /<•?. Connecticut, June, 1893, £ /vVHa^ 3 Jl f ’ r* P * r - X! « 2?jS> ^ J i iVf £}•* Birds of the Adirondack Region. C.H.Memana. 59. Astragalinus tristis {Linn.) Cabanis. American Goldfinch. — Common summer resident, breeding late — generally in July and some- times in August. EuU. N, O.O, 0»0ct, 1881, p, 229 Notes, Shelter Island, N.Y. W.W. "Worthington. the cheerful twittering of the Goldfinches ha s been heard in | the severest weather. O.&o. X. May, 1886. p. % 0 . Arrivals ofMig'y Birds, Spring-1886 Central Park, N. Y. City. A. G. Paine, Jr. March 7, Spinus tristis, (529). American Gold- finch. O.&O. XI. July. 1886, p. 109 Oneida County, New York William i,, Ralph & Egbert Spinus tristis— Messrs. Shepard and Hughes found these birds at Remsen, Dec. 2 0 to 22, 1888. " 1 Atlk* VII, July, 1890, p, 23 /i itx Qj^rJjl ^ 5 ' ^ £) , Goldfinch. Tolerably common in flocks. B. A. Sterling, Brooklyn, Pa. Auk, XIX, July, 1902, p.298. Albinism and Melanism in North American Birds* Ruthven Deane. A white specimen of the American Goldfinch is in the collection of Mr. J. B. Gilbert of Penn Yan, N. Y. Bull. N. 0.0, 4, Jan., 1870. p 2a The Singing of Birds. E.P.Bicknell. Astragalinus tristis. American Goldfinch. A wide variation in the time of the beginning of song with this species in different years is doubtless attributable to the same , causes that produce like results in the case of the Purple Finch. My records show that at any time between March 16 and April 17 it is not unusual for singing to begin. March 3 (in the preco- cious season of 1878*) is an exceptionally early date; April 23, 1883, an exceptionally late one. In the spring and early summer singing is likely to be inconstant ; doubtless for the reason that the birds are not disposed to stay long at any locality when not under the restraint of domestic duties, and while wandering about in flocks they seem disinclined to sing. Final songs are sung at the last of August (20th and 26th to 30th) ; though I have no record for 1881 later than August 8, notwithstanding that the birds were present through the month ; possibly observation was at fault. After the close of summer their song is not again heard until the following spring. Singing begins in the spring before the perfect summer plumage is assumed ; but for that matter many of the birds are to be seen even so late as mid-May with a dusky tarnish still marring their golden coats. The Goldfinch often sings while on the wing. Auk, I, Oct. , 1884, p, 3 • *See a paper by the writer in ‘The Country’ for March 31, 1878, ‘On the Animal and Vegetable Life of the Past Winter.’ Queer Occupant of a Goldfinch’s Nest. It was a bright winter morning, with the thermometer dallying among the small fig- ures, the fields white with their winter over- coats and silence almost unbroken, not even the chirp of a Snowbird to break the wintry quiet, but as I passed into the street and walked up the deserted road the depressing stillness of nature was suddenly broken by the lively chattering of a flock of Goldfinches j which sprang up from the roadside at my j approach, where they had been gathering a : breakfast scant and dry from the tufts of grass and weeds whose tops extended above the snow banks that covered the ground. There is a cheeriness and life about the con- fused chattering of a flock of Goldfinches that gives a charm to the bleak landscape, though there is little in the note or the winter garb of the bird to remind one of the sweet song or the gaily painted songster that scattered the down from the thistle head last summer. With graceful evolutions and soft and gentle mingling of happy voices, the little flock gathered in a tree top by the roadside, the very same tree where a pair of their number during the heats of last summer built themselves a nest and essayed to rear a family. It was a broad branching oak and one of its far-reaching arms extended quite over the carriage track, and there among the dense foliage they built the beautiful nest. Travellers in their wagons could easily have raised themselves up and looked into it, situated as it was in full view of every passer, but I doubt if any one beside myself ever observed the dark spot among the foliage. As the birds gathered in the top of the tree that winter’s morning I saw in bold re- lief against the bleak landscape that little nest still securely held in its place, defying the storms and gales of winter and appear- ing as sound as when I first looked into it in the heats of last July. The Goldfinch 5 2 ugust I of the Id. All )f osage spri fppt ORNITT es from t’s nest- builds a compact nest, soft, firm secure and y apple substantial, and I have observed them out- the or- riding sometimes the rigors of even a second finding winter and reflecting credit on the marvel- ~ept in lous ingenuity and skill of the architect. placed It recalls to my mind some curious cir- ; hedge, cumstances in the history of this nest, chiefly astened to note which this article was penned. About js. One two weeks after I first observed it, apparently mb and just about completed, I essayed to look into though it one day in passing. Pulling the branch base to down till the nest was in easy reach I placed ition in my hand on it, and to say I was startled but daily in faintly expresses the feeling with which I let 0 m two loose my grasp on the branch as a lively hade of little animal sprang from the nest like a flash [ closely almost into my face and thence to the ground, igments One of those long-tailed mice that I some- appear- times meet in the woods had ejected the Within rightful owner and appropriated to his own \ within use the cosy little nest. This tree stood e . An- quite alone beside a much travelled highway, ,f a yel- the branch on which the nest was built ex- 5 lining, tending nearly at right angles from the trunk, j-. One as before intimated, directly over the wagon woven track about twenty feet from it and about twelve feet above the roadway. It is the strange and unexpected that sur- prises us, and of all things to have found a mouse in such a situation seemed the very last thing in the last possible place. The mouse met a well deserved fate on the spot. The birds reared their brood in another nest in the top of a tall chestnut tree near at hand and the deserted nest still waves a conspic- uous object at the end of the naked branch over the street. John N. Clark. Saybrook, Conn. O.& O.Vol.18. 4r»UT 8a3 )on the driven an ad- e fee]' E. No tan five .11 com- , AluSXi Jaorxng, fresh, 1 (, r Tliistlebird. J If three 3 i re tlie companionship iltained ie country, although it 1 more 3re - These birds make south about the last of ll uot r commence building /XuJ* ^ f 0 °l . -^erican Gol d Finche s. &■ **** , f?ci O.&O. IX. Oct. 1884. p. /2V. until it is placed in a maple tree or Jnd is composed of thistledown and horse hair. It is deeply hollowed; the measurement of nest is 1 1-4 in. in width by 1 3-4 in. in depth. The nest is also very neat and compact. The eggs, usually four in num- ber, are of a beautiful bluish-white color, and measure 32-48 in. by 1-2 in. As the middle of October draws near these birds congregate in immense flocks (at this time they live on seeds) and depart for the south. Q, &0, XV, fane, 1890, P*88 6 $ August Nests and Birds. .OGIST. Queer Occupant of a Gold Nest. It was a bright winter morning thermometer dallying among the ures the fields white with their wi coats and silence almost unbroken the chirp of a Snowbird to break quiet, but as I passed into the s walked up the deserted road the ; stillness of nature was sudden y the lively chattering of a flock of G which sprang up from the roads! approach, where they had been g breakfast scant and dry from th grass and weeds whose tops extern the snow banks that covered th There is a cheeriness and life aboi fused chattering of a flock of G that gives a charm to the bleak though there is little in the no winter garb of the bird to remind sweet song or the gaily painted so scattered the down from the th last summer. i with graceful evolutions anc ! gentle mingling of happy voices flock gathered in a tree top by t > the very same tree where a pai number during the heats of las built themselves a nest and essay a family. It was a broad branchu one of its far-reaching arms extei over the carriage track, and there dense foliage they built the bea Travellers in their wagons could raised themselves up and looke situated as it was in full view of m f \ 6 American C old Finr.i,,. ,, ifi- an d on “ Small' Birds [ Ulirysomitris tnshs and Dendneca coronata ] caught by the Burdock” (p. 239), by A. K. iisher. Atter. Naturalist, Vol.lO.Mar. J .*. r V/ JLWCOClli- blance in the Yellow-Bird,” Chrysomitris tristis (p. 115), by Henry Gill- man - Amer, NafcoraUstt Yol, 10, Fata, Young Oologist. I53S- ‘Lettuce Bird: By E. T. Adney. Ibid., p. 100 .— A name for Anlr TTii r Spinus tristis. 1890. p. *4 ’ U ’ J * a ’ anny So.Oologist.1490. The American Goldfinch R,r 7 By George h. Selover. Ihid - ’ PP- 6 -7 AuU. ‘Vll.iiUi, £1 Auk, XV, July, 1898, p p.Z3f-2.y3, A MONTH WITH THE GOLDFINCHES. BY MARY EMILY BRUCE. The nesting season is nearly over and the air is full of the voices of young birds before the Goldfinches begin to build. In the leisurely golden time of the year, when the fields are yellow with grain and the roadsides gay with golden-rod, the dainty pair, in love with the summer, the sunshine, and each other, plan their home. True to their careless, happy natures they neither hurry nor overwork. A suitable place is chosen, the nest is built, the eggs are laid, and the little dame sits content in the sun, while her mate fills the air with music, as high over woods and fields he takes his undulating flight in search of food. To watch a Gold- finch’s home is a privilege that brightens the whole summer, and one would like to write their story with a pen dipped in sunshine. It was late in July before I reached the farmhouse among the hills of Vermont where I was to spend my vacation, and I found the orchards near the house already full of young birds. Baby robber and murderer. I could draw my chair quite near to the little pear tree, and the mother bird would look at me without a shadow of alarm in her bright eyes. It was marvelous to see how quickly she recognized the voice of her mate in the Goldfinch chorus about her. Her neighbors in the maple tree might come and go, and she never stirred a feather, but a sudden quivering of the wings and a soft twittering response would announce his approach long before I could hear his voice, and as his song became audible to me, louder and more joyful grew her note of welcome. He would alight in a neighboring tree, speak to me first in a mild, questioning tone, like a pet canary talking to his mistress, and then fly down to the nest and feed his 240 Bruce, A Month with the Goldfi?iches. fAuk L July Sapsuckers flopped about in the apple trees, young Vireos were followed here and there by anxious mothers, Catbirds uttered notes of warning by the roadsides, and infant Flycatchers and Thrushes regarded me with large inquiring eyes. A pair of belated Robins, nervous and overworked, were looking after their young ones, who were still in the nest, but for the most part family cares were over, and my only hope of watching the home life of the birds was to find a Goldfinch’s nest. In vain I searched the orchard near the house. Goldfinches flashed in and out among the branches, and sang of summer joys over my head, but they guarded well the secret of their homes. When I had nearly given up in despair, chance favored me, and I happened upon the object of my search in a maple tree in front of a neighboring farmhouse. Blessings never come singly, and just as I was rejoicing in this treasure trove the little daughter of the house pointed out another nest in the orchard. A third nest, also in a maple tree, was discovered a few days later, but this was already full of half fledged birds, and both maple tree dwellings were too high in the branches to be easily watched. Nothing could be better suited to my purpose than the home in the orchard. The Goldfinches had chosen a tiny pear tree quite close to the house, and the nest was barely four feet from the ground. There was something very charming in the confidence they had shown their human neighbors, and the pair won my heart from the first by their gentle, trustful ways. It was a satis- faction to watch a nest for once where I was not treated like a robber and murderer. I could draw my chair quite near to the little pear tree, and the mother bird would look at me without a shadow of alarm in her bright eyes. It was marvelous to see how quickly she recognized the voice of her mate in the Goldfinch chorus about her. Her neighbors in the maple tree might come and go, and she never stirred a feather, but a sudden quivering of the wings and a soft twittering response would announce his approach long before I could hear his voice, and as his song became audible to me, louder and more joyful grew her note of welcome. He would alight in a neighboring tree, speak to me first in a mild, questioning tone, like a pet canary talking to his mistress, and then fly down to the nest and feed his Vol. XVI 1898 J Bruce, A Month 'with the Goldfinches. 24I mate. After the dainty meal was finished they would talk together for a moment before he left her for another flight into the big sunshiny world. Life in this miniature home was very sweet and harmonious, and the golden bird in the tiny tree with its treasure of a nest made a charming picture. For the next four weeks I visited the orchard daily. They were quiet hours I spent there, but there was no lack of enter- tainment. For music the Field Sparrows sang to me their simple, plaintive songs, and from far up on the hills I could sometimes hear the chant of the Hermit Thrush. A pair of Chipping Sparrows in a neighboring apple tree were bringing up their only child with quite as much solicitude as if they were bur- dened with a large family. They were a striking contrast to the serene and happy Goldfinches, but, plain little brown folks as they were, I enjoyed watching them. Sometimes young Warblers, looking strangely unlike their parents, visited the orchard, or a bevy of Crows from a maple grove near by, disturbed by a pass- ing Hawk, startled me out of my day dreams. I wondered if the little Goldfinch had as many resources as I, or if the hours seemed long to her. Perhaps she too dreamed day dreams and listened to the music of nature. She seldom left the nest, though I occasionally startled her off by some sudden movement, when she reproached me for my carelessness in the sweetest of voices. When I first looked into the nest there were six eggs, white, with faintest tinge of blue, and pretty enough to satisfy any bird mother, but my little girl friend had told me that there were but two eggs laid when the bird began to sit, and I was curious to know whether there would not be a marked difference in the age of the young ones. After two week’s patient waiting the little mother and I were rewarded by finding among the pretty eggs a very ugly birdling. On my afternoon visit there were three little birds, the next day four, and on the day following I counted five heads. By this time the mother did not sit con- stantly on the nest, but cunningly tucked the remaining egg under the little birds and went on short excursions into the country. Whether the young ones did not do their duty, or whether it was another instance of the survival of the fittest I cannot tell, but when the oldest nestling was five days old I again counted heads l6 70 242 Bruce, A Month with the Goldfinches. TAuli LJuiy and there were only four. The youngest child and the sixth egg had both disappeared, and I decided that in the struggle for existence the older birds must have had too great an advantage in point of time. As it was, the nest seemed hardly large enough, and the four had a comical fashion of lying with their long necks stretched out and their heads hanging over the edge, their eyes half closed and their mouths wide open as if gasping for air. Certainly uglier birdlings never gladdened the hearts of deluded parents. For the first week they showed little intelligence. At the noise of a passing wagon four mouths would open as quickly as at the sound of the mother.’s voice, and they greeted me in the same ravenous manner. I responded by trying to feed them with crushed plantain seed, but though they opened their bills to receive the morsel, the experiment was not very successful. It would take the eye of faith to see in these atoms of birdhood the potential grace and beauty of a mature Goldfinch, and I sometimes fancied that the mother herself had doubts about them, for she would stand pensively on the edge of the nest in her visits to the home tree and look unutterable things. The little birds were fed very slowly and thoroughly about once an hour, sometimes by the father, sometimes by the mother. Possibly the par- ents came oftener during my absence, but from the time the sitting was over I saw them less and less frequently, though I was sometimes greeted on my arrival by a note of inquiry from the tree tops. I hope I proved myself worthy of the confidence placed in me. I did not sit too near the nest, and by moving quietly and speaking softly I tried, in my poor human fashion, to become a fit associate for my gentle friends. Though so seldom fed, the little ones seemed to thrive on fresh air and sunshine. Stretching matches and other gymnastics were practised daily, pretty feathers gradually appeared, and by the time they were ten days old they were bonny birdlings resembling their mother. From her they had inherited gentle manners and soft voices, for it was at that early age that they began to talk. They no longer mistook me for a parent bird, but seemed fond of me, trying to swallow the bits of hard boiled egg I offered them, and show- ing no fear when I took them out of the nest. When they were nearly two weeks old I visited the orchard 2 43 Vo l' Bruce, A Month with the Goldfinches. 1090 J every morning before breakfast, expecting each day to find my birdlings flown, but it was not until the sixteenth day that the event occurred for which I had been waiting. On this morning I was more grieved than surprised to find only two little birds left in the nest. I spent the entire morning in the orchard, waiting to see the remaining birdlings take flight. It seemed to be the policy of the parents to induce them to come out for something to eat, for they were not once fed during this time. I offered them morsels of egg, but they paid little heed to me. They were restless, and I saw that the old home and old friends had lost all charm for them. Suddenly while I watched, one of the two birdlings scrambled onto the edge of the nest, balanced himself for a moment, and then flew straight into the nearest apple tree. From this vantage ground he looked down into the tiny pear tree home that had once seemed all the world to him, and called back to his little brother that he had found a larger and greener world than that. The baby in the nest seemed half inclined to follow him, but at each attempt after much flutter- ing of the wings he would slip back into the old place. Presently the mother came with a morsel of food for the brave little bird in the tree, but no attention was paid to the pleading cry of his lazy brother, and very soon the venturesome young one found the use of his wings so pleasant and the food she offered him so tempting that he followed her across the orchard into the fields beyond. On my afternoon visit the poor little coward was still in the nest, apparently very hungry and teasing incessantly. He may have thought that he was forgotten, — and I confess that I had fears of this myself, — when late in the afternoon, brighter than a gleam of sunshine, doubtless, to the waiting bird, came the father to the nest. Only this encouragement was needed, the little fellow was not to be left alone again ; in a moment he was standing on a tiny twig above the nest, there was another moment of balanc- ing and indecision, and then taking heart he too flew across to the friendly apple tree. He was rewarded by the instant appear- ance of his mother who had doubtless waited for this evidence of courage on the part of her youngest darling. She first gave him a hearty meal, and then flew from tree to tree towards the fields beyond. My birdling followed her in pretty, undulating, Gold- finch fashion, and I was left alone in the orchard. Auk, XVI Jan., 1899, pp 79-9 o On the Genus Astragalinus Cabanis. — When Cabanis established the genus Astragalinus (Mus. Hein. I, July, 1851, 159) he mentioned no type, but ranged under the generic name A. tristis, A. mexicanus , and A. columbianus , and in a footnote mentions also A. pistacinus and A. yarrelli “ as the nearest relatives of the type of the genus,” which must, therefore have been one of the above mentioned species. In the catalogue of the Fringillidae in the collection of the British Museum (Cat. Birds Brit. Mus. XII, 1888, 192), Dr. Sharpe gives the type as Fringilla tristis Lin- naeus; and that he is correct in doing so is proven by the fact that the only one of the three species named by Cabanis to be made the type of another supposed genus is Fringilla f salt r in Say (nonspecific with Carduelis mexicanus Swainson), which Cassin, fourteen years later, designated as type of his subgenus Pseudomitris (Proc. Ac. Nat. Sci. Phila. 1865, 93). This clearly establishes Fringilla tristis as the type of the genus Astragalinus , even were F. psaltria (with its subspecies mexicanus and columbianus ) generically distinct, which they are not. Carduelis lawrencei Cassin is also an Astragalinus, and the only known species of the genus not mentioned by Cabanis. The genus is confined, so far as known, to North America, one form barely entering the northern frontier of the southern continent. This is A si rag a linns psa liria Colum- biana, which ranges from Colombia to Costa Rica. Carduelis yarrelli Audubon, which Cabanis, in the footnote cited above, refers to Astraga- linus is a Spinus, as are all other purely South American species, as well as all of those peculiar to Mexico and Central America (excepting, of course, the subspecific forms of Astragalinus psaltria). The North American species and subspecies of Astragalinus are as follows : — 529. Astragalinus tristis (Linn.). A. [ stragalinus ] tristis Cabanis, Mus. Ilein. I, July, 1851, 159. 52917. Astragalinus tristis pallidus (Mearns). 529 b. Astragalinus tristis salicamans (Grinnell). Spinus tristis salicamans Grinnell, Auk, XIV, Oct. 1897, 397. Geog. Dist. — Pacific coast district of United States. 530. Astragalinus psaltria (Say). Astragalinus psaltria Ridgway, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus. Ill Aug. 27, 1880, 177. 530m Astragalinus psaltria arizonae (Coues). Astragalinus psaltria arizonce Riugway, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus. Ill, Aug. 27, 1880, 177. 530A Astragalinus psaltria mexicanus (Swains. ). Astragalinus psaltria mexicanus Ridgway, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus. Ill, Aug. 27, 1880, 177. 531. Astragalinus lawrencei (Cassin). Astragalinus lawrenceii Ridgway, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus. Ill, Aug. 27, 1880, 177. The remaining species ranged under Spinus in the A. O. U. Check-List should remain in that genus. — Robert Ridgway, Washington, D. C. £j i vi o -£ Ca nnc^b i'K P°^A- //, r#p^J <&~4-b- 0-pc^> &W (fc'tjf Urr^ ^AtS , /fay C4*v &7C& £<- ^ /ts^ts ^ - feo £r€£^Xr ftu. ^ ‘-'■^ /2: ^ #£tL jfc^t, ?Uoy~ S^^y t ±jn^ iLS //LW~ i^TcZ cA C Ou f7^7l/'jC^ J AcrzA^ ^ ^2^^ c>z ‘A^c^Z/ - C^ ^^Zri^/^) CT* C^-ei^^S ^--A) ^AZ^ccA ^ ^°^) /U ^^ Ct -A AfcAvzA^ tZcZZ' jZ Taa, Atrzod&y cru ~%u ZrZZAAz /Zrzc*La- /ot3 z2*^$Zc / AAjL.^ jb^<*uAcJ~ A/ *^ZJjZz. &^s&Y~*y (^y V* / £{r&^& £&4-OL^rr>-^~^ £c~ t~h xAz& ^2^*? c^y~~c. — '-/ ^2? cf^TujZ^> ■ ZzJhn-€&& ■ ^7^Ar~Z AcZth^ JZ^L- /'C--*rz< jsX O XX? J^^XiTjr-rX^ , >^X PPufa* XX rrr-c^ox) Crtuz flCv ^X^U^LX r ^&&4 crj£ {aT^LX <-^\ 3<_-c c£&e*. 4*^ T'fcc ^V*^ 3 '>~^u^ & Xcr^u^ Jp&v £ XX ^ <=<~A^JZ- ■ QjQ. 'CSIUjC' X ^ X W' 5^^, feXX-02. &-4<-£^ /?S. (p^c&c / U'*P4 «-*^H . ( >u-~L 6~3eL^ J /itSr yV<^v. y a. c ^ a^/i — y£. , <^^7 ' 1 n*ArJ^ /uv-U^v* £T7 ^cej^ZJty. o~x^_ /c*l^ 3 £'<^Jl4l^, «_4 */< *./ y A-*-»— ^ ^ ^ -*->- »-c , ^ L» «^u. 4^,0-vX^ 4 k — ^-c-V ^Lk-o . zr 1^ &C^SL, y/ ^c-4. ~cZ _ J-^*- -\_ 1-a-a. A^A/ a-A^^v ^^ 4 aaa (^AAa^^a aa^/ . ^^H'A./ ^ £“l X‘ (/Z^~+za: / 5, '/.R 22 U 33 o //>lr CU^r Ut^ij ^L (-vu-e^c f^M^AAT^Z j ^HaaAaA^aW^ ^/^aMaAaC/ /nr-: ^ /bo*. - /rtf y •y^friXl^ Q-LJ~—v. Qs&—d~- cjLaZZ^ />-j ' I >^0-a-a_a_a ^-A. *3oo -A ^—Ja^caZS d-cJ^r ^S^o~AA-^l ^ / 7 v y t . t ./ b'CAA-^ a^SL-a.-^^, ax — ^2X_ C „ J/ ^*n/ ^T+rZ^f -»^ ^c^nu^. ^ / ^Jj^- **Z<^ . TAl^- *■ A&-? Ac^7 <-*A^zZ (/ jr y 6 ~ 7/ tyl frSM. fh^oL/ ( ) jfl/ttdt-l-O aA / i * *■ j^7'*- i 7^ / j/i. ^ 5^ /Z <>x /^ <^<^L cZ^ZZZZ y /♦o ^r &tA~^Z7J ifc v jhztCA. ftrxZAi ^La/ i^XJJcAxc^ fZZZ* f £4 J***z£* .*4l* ^ ^ f >fc ^W ^/4*^ /7t-^A l*^-ZXZ j -4^ f^X 7-t r / ^ ^ // > A • * / — -e- — ^ ^ ^Lo-o ^c<-<^»-/ i^o" - — Cjt^^m^e^/ gv^ _ ^C a^-c^ o-£j_ cu^a^. ^c^ Co-csfcr h^j. erf $ g^Z^Xa ' ^ ^ x y 2 i \ V 7-(r%^r 1 e.Jt. /6 7JZ Jl'tAsVi. (*? Jlfk 6 CLASlrWXst TV^.2./ C f <-c^> ■jt-d/xA-ttZ-' '^-'(-ASs-dC-? «*_». ^«. <-A/TrTl^o(-*t *Aa cAa^\ ^Ctu^X ol/^Jcot^e( r P^tnf ( } ?1 1 ; g, / ^ : f ' j ) /fJ 7 Ukr.Jr? a- ( ' > 4 /. / A O^r+K 3 < C/a-A^cj $-tr**Arx/A7rr /'T' The Pine Finches, when they are here ^ ^7 at all, and the Thistle Birds are both fond 1 ^ ^of the seeds of our pine and fir trees, and ^^during the winter of 1887-88, when the informer bird was especially common, the seeds of these trees and the burdock con- stituted its main food. ^ fel**J*^ 8^ »Wa /0 ^tvy«-C&vw /L*fc-U O*^ ^vw ^ v^ ^ V~~'' °~4 *-*" -- 4~ 004,1890. p, /& The Pine Siskin Breeding at Guelph, Ontario. — During the past winter (1904-1905) the Pine Siskin (Spinus pinus) was abundant in the vicinity of Guelph, Ont. After the middle of April no flocks were noted but they were still commonly seen in pairs or groups of three or four individuals. All through May they were common and were breeding throughout the county of Wellington. Some ten nests were found, all in white spruces, black spruces, or balsams. The first nest for Central Ontario was found in Guelph on May 7, 1905, by Mr. F. Norman Beattie (Bull. Mich. Orn. Club, Vol. VI, Nos. 1-2). Our only previous Ontario records were for the vicinity of Ottawa where Mr. Sarneau has taken seven nests. — A. B. Klugh, Guelph , Ont. '-.ok, XXII, Oca, 1806 , firmer. 1SS7.I Allen, Nesting of the Pine Finch in Southern New York. 2 8 Cj ation, and after the second day I noticed that nothing seemed to be added to the structure, and my fears that they had abandoned it proved true. Still the birds were about, and the female was often observed with bits of nest-material in her bill. A little patient watching disclosed the fact that a new nesting-site had been chosen, — this time the extremity of an upper branch of a neighboring Norway pine, about thirty-five feet from the ground, and about the same distance from the much frequented piazza of the house. As it was on the side of the tree toward the house, and nearly on a level with the windows of my room, I had a fine opportunity of watching the industrious little architects, although the nest itself was completely hidden from view by the dense pine needles in which it was placed. of this series. We reached Tarpon 'Springs ea’ny’ofi’' rjarrudy morning. As a result of this five weeks’ cruise I had collected in all about two hundred and fifty birds, which have already been spoken of in detail. At Tarpon Springs I learned that J. H. Batty was at Trouble Creek, a point six miles north of here, and later the men who had killed birds for him there, told me that he bought all the birds they could kill for him, except White Ibises. These included the more common of the smaller land birds, which were appar- ently as desirable as the water species. He took all Hawks and Owls, and also the Florida Quail. The prices paid for these birds in the flesh ranged from ten cents up to as high as seventy- five cents, and even a dollar for some kinds, such as the Great Blue Heron. The facts I have presented in these papers have been mainly derived from my personal observation, and I have carefully avoided giving any information supplied from outside sources unless I felt sure that it was to be relied upon. It is scarcely necessary to draw any conclusions or inferences. This great and growing evil speaks for itself. I have the name and addresses of some fifty dealers in various towns in Florida and the principal cities of the country. Merchants in New York and other centres are buying every month the skins and plumes of Florida birds. The price paid for such material, notwithstand- ing the efforts made to create sympathy for the birds, and a feeling against using the feathers for hats and other decorative purposes, . . IS THE PINE FINCH ( SPIN US PINUS) BREEDING AT CORNWALL-ON-HUDSON, N. Y. BY J. A. ALLEN. On April 20. 1887, I went to Cornwall-on-Hudson, Orange Co., N. Y., where I remained till May 12, making my home at the residence of Mr. Daniel Taft. The house is in the midst of a lawn of several acres in extent, well set with fruit and shade trees, overlooking the Hudson. On the day of my arrival a small flock of Pine Finches, busily hunting food in the pines . and spruces, attracted my attention, but as the season was late and the weather still cold it was not, of course, a noteworthy occurrence. They continued to haunt the vicinity for several days, when all disappeared except a sin- gle pair. On the morning of May 3, I was surprised to see one of the birds gathering material for a nest. She was easily traced to the lower branch of a Norway pine, scarcely thirty feet from the piazza, and almost within reach of a little summer house overrun with a wisteria vine. The site chosen for the nest was the extremity of the branch, about eight or ten feet from the ground, and well concealed. Several times the little builder carried material to the nest while I was sitting in the arbor, al- most within reach of it. Although I afterward carefully kept away, the birds seemed not fully satisfied with the exposed situ- 1SS7.] Allen, Nesting of the Pine Finch in Southern New York. 28 $ ation, and after the second day I noticed that nothing seemed to be added to the structure, and my fears that they had abandoned it proved true. Still the birds were about, and the female was often observed with bits of nest-material in her bill, A little patient watching disclosed the fact that a new nesting-site had been chosen, — this time the extremity of an upper branch of a neighboring Norway pine, about thirty-five feet from the ground, and about the same distance from the much frequented piazza of the house. As it was on the side of the tree toward the house, and nearly on a level with the windows of my room, I had a fine opportunity of watching the industrious little architects, although the nest itself was completely hidden from view by the dense pine needles in which it was placed. One of the birds, presumably the female, did all the work, but was escorted to and from the nest by the male, who further manifested his interest and joy by a profusion of Canary-like t-xee-e-ts and other peculiarly sweet and pleasing notes. Later the birds were more silent and much less frequently seen ; — it was evident that incubation had begun. Here was certainly a prize, which, in view of all the circumstances, it seemed hardly right to ignore ; for the nests and eggs of the Pine Finch are by no means easy to discover, are still rare in collections, and the breeding of the species so far south of its usual summer home a noteworthy event ; yet it required no slight struggle with tender feelings to decide to break up the happy home, even in behalf of science, and of the museum whose ornithological interests I may be supposed to have deeply at heart. On May 12 I enlisted the services of my young nephew, R. T. Swezey, who kindly ascended to the nest on a. tour of observation, finding, as was anticipated, a full clutch and the female sitting. She remained on the nest till his hand touched the branch on which the nest rested, when she flew off with a great outcry and dashed frantically about for some seconds, passing and repassing within a few yards of the nest, uttering such plaintive notes of distress as to make the, task of securing the prize indeed a sad one. The nest was placed at the base of a bunch of cones within a few inches of the extremity of the branch, and being thorough- ly shielded on all sides by the strongly resisting, long, sharp needles, it was no easy matter to reach out to the nest and, in- serting the hand, safely remove the coveted treasures. The four eggs were, however, secured without accident, the nest was removed in situ by taking with it the supporting branch ; the male joined his mate in her distress and both were shot and, with the nest and eggs, added to the oological rarities of the American Museum of Natural History, where, in due time, they will form one of the attractive ‘Bird Groups’ of the exhibition collection. The four eggs measure (in millimetres) as follows : i8x 12.5, i8x 12," 18X 12, 17X 11. The ground color is pale bluish white in all, but the markings vary greatly. In one the greater part of the surface is marked with sharply-defined dots and specks of dark reddish brown, but more thickly aggregated about the lar- ger end. In another the spots are larger, fewer and paler, and more vinaceous in tint, and are mostly on one side of the egg near the larger end. In a third the markings, which nearly cover and are mostly confined to the larger end, are pale, not well defined, and vinaceous brown ; beside these are several conspicu- ous blotches of blackish brown, the largest of which is near the larger end of the egg. In the remaining egg the markings form a single narrow streak of sienna brown nearly encircling the egg at its thickest point ; it begins in a coarse blotch of blackish brown, from which proceeds a narrow line encircling the egg, becoming narrower and paler as it advances, and finally quite indistinct, it much resembling the narrow pencillings seen in the eggs of many Orioles. This egg in respect to markings is as different from the egg first described as are the eggs of the Field Sparrow and Chipping Sparrow. The nest is well-built, neat, and compact, and quite large for the size of the bird. It measures 57 mm. (2J inches) in inside diameter, 90 mm. (3J inches) in outside diameter, and 37 mm. (ij inches) in depth (inside measurement). The base of the nest is formed of string, thread, a long piece of tape, and rootlets woven into the pine needles on which it rests, some of the strings and the tape being looped about and bound to the clusters of needles. On this rests a cup-shaped structure of coarse and fine rootlets and soft vegetable fibre, lined with black horse-hair. The nest found by Dr. A. K. Fisher at Sing Sing, N. Y. (Bull. Nutt. Orn. Club, VIII, 1883, P- 1S0), and the one found at Cambridge, Mass., in May, 1859, are, so far as I am aware, the only recorded instances of the breeding of this species south of the Canadian Fauna. Auk, 4, Oct. 1887. p. 2$ H - 2 & ■ | Tameness of the Pine Siskin. — On April 29, 1888, while walking near Oak Hill in Newton, Mass., I noticed two Pine Siskins (Sfiinus pinus), about a heap of hops by the roadside. One of them flew away at my approach, but the other remained there feeding, and, though perfectly able-bodied and in good condition, was remarkably tame. I stood watch- ing him some time. After a while I reached out and stroked him, and finally succeeded in catching him in one hand. When I let him go, he flew oft' to some distance. Before I caught him, he went and perched in a bush near by and apparently went to sleep, putting his head over his left wing under the scapulary feathers, so that it was completely hidden. When I approached too near, he would take his head out and look at me and then put it back again when I drew back. The ground about there was sprinkled with droppings, showing that the birds had probably been there for some time. Was this bird affected by the hops, or is there any other explanation of his curious conduct ? The hops were to be used as dressing for a field of grass. — Francis H. Allen, West Roxbury, Mass. Aok, V, Oct,, 1688. p. £/ Z& . 412. Field Glass [ Ornithology ]. ByG. R. C. Ibid., pp. 150, 151, 157, 158. — It is to be hoped that this method will be reserved for those “who have no wish, strictly speaking, to become ornithologists or oologists,” and that observations made by persons who have “become acquainted” with birds in this way will never be put in print as a contribution to ornithology. The writer in attempting to teach this system gives an illustration of how to identify birds with a glass, his “Pine-linnets ( Ckrysomitris Minus')” be- ing known by “the prominent and always constant bright yellow rump.” Comment is needless. Watching birds through a field glass as a pleasant amusement we would not discourage, but as a method of identifying birds by novices, we do not know of a more excellent illustration of “how not to do it.” Q, & Q. W'O’L Ckrysomitris f>i?ius. By Dr. Elliott Coues. >id., XIX, No. 19, p. 364, Dec. 7, 1882.— General history of the species, ith cut of Pine Finch and of American Goldfinch. 232. The Pine Siskin. Ib with 197. Carduelis carduelis. European Goldfinch. — "A male Euro- pean Goldfinch was collected May 21, 1887, by Mr. Daniel S. Cox, about a. mile north of the city limits — one out of four — while resting on the top of a beech tree. The remaining three flew off in a northerly direction. The birds were evidently in a natural condition and doubtless from the= New York colony.” (William Brodie. 3 ) 3 Auk, y, isss, 211 . The Goldfinch ( Carduelis carduelis ) near Boston, Mass. In Brook- line, Massachusetts, in May, 1892, I noted a bird of this species feeding in a pine tree in company with a few American Goldfinches. It seemed peifectly at home and therefore I take it was not an escaped cage bird, rather one of the Goldfinches or their offspring that were imported to this country not long ago. — Reginald Heber Howe. Jr., Boston , Mass. Auk, XII, April, 1895, p. /V*. t 1/vA/V/i. )t*rCC The European Goldfinch ( Carduelis elegcins ) has been repeatedly taken in a wild state in Eastern Massachusetts ; so frequently, in fact, that it has been conjectured that this hardy species may have become established here through fortuitous introduction. It being a common cage-bird, it seems probable that numbers may escape each year, while their hardy nature would easily enable them to maintain an existence here for a con- siderable period. Mr. William Brewster informs me that he shot a pair, April 21, 1875, the female of which was found to contain eggs that would have been laid in a few days. They were very wild, and were not recognized till they had been shot. In addition to the many that doubtless escape every year from confinement, a considerable number were turned out, Mr. Brewster informs me, not long before this date/ by the “ Society for the Acclimatiza- tion of Foreign Birds.” j . a. a £ £^ . Bull, N, O.O, 5, April, 1880, p, / ' 2-0 zx^y-^-^y 3 <^~0 a^T &-Mst-A & (H (h/ Haasi^ »->— /{^ ^Xot i-fr-KsuVtZ TZZ A^yv-xn^j ^ ^T b-ZZiZi^

- ^C^O-V-^^V ^ C^vxA^eL IaaAZ 6Ua^ZI/> <~x. \rtZ- ZZ~ ^~ir-o~A . ^ Zsi^sO ^-xyx o-*. ^-i-'o ^ sxZZ. . Lzr TZCZy j/^yj Fjf ^fcCZ. &e^£C3Z zL^yy ^/ ^ j, $Las<. ~^Laas3 ^z<^(_ask^ oty\) L-o&^G ^13 Cv^CA^. ^-t 1 ^ ^-'l/tf'v/vj ^UxiV^Vtc^ ‘i'4~~i rvuu_-<^ jbix. <^~z LiTeisO ^ti) ” \.e*-^A^+ ^ — 4 XAs§y 3z SL. ^) $2a*~ $ c^^/sCAA'-c.y t^—K-^y^A. u^-x c/\^z ^^v^r-v — 4- c c>3z ^ 2 c y ct^ vt ^^\y\ £tAAy ^-Ar^r^y V\A~-(4- (^J^/yl**. Laj-^^p^ / iAjy^X<^-j 0-1^+^ * * =v J £ ~aaa-cL /yy^A^A // llA/i/L) L cjZCfcZty (!y ^f^Zcyt Oy ty^iA. CuA^Zt^ci ciHs&tZ ^Aa(/L. t^yjLJ-^y, Z 3 >X^ (bisTstsisisi^A. __ C C>‘t'{{\ £td/C C+fiC TaaA^ c^v-t-U. HaXJaJ- y L^*^/Cy ^ ^*k_ajui^ /tr^-y ty&^Z. iajJCo cl/Uji a-/^-aw /< CC^V>T^ T /"— „ y l_xx tiay- (^/L^cZZ^C^j /B — •- i^f-t-ZZ /fcc) A.A_X-o^i . h l/] hsQ lAstAAHA, K) t*AAAt^-ys^AAAA-*A. . kxfZvL. ^Aaaa (L^a, cL t.- fyyiyA. "ftfrobi //^A- , t ^ v ^4 ^yy^cAyt (J-x ^Xxa_cav^/ < ^- y C*yd J Ol CAX-x fi — 0-sV\^l-sd~ys-4 AM-A ^C 4 / 6 wa/^-X a< /. X. a 5 ‘ /^ ^X(/AAA- , QlAj-KsO ^^Uaa ^VxaaX ^£yC~ ^^/l>CtAA. ^ATvZ^a ^9 aa 0 4 aa- 4 o ^ C-K^^-' ^ A c*SX^ ^AA!-*a-^ 'X^CaA j IaTx^j (%-IA^cl. /t cAA2-ts4 IaaZ^ — < 3 L 4 ^C <^tA,eA- ~$y-' ^ '^L'trcJ ' C '^AjAA^y/j £AcJy_ (xaaV 0~ir\A. ~^CZ^ ^~ ^C^_^-J 6x*aZ?j 4wvt (a^ yj-t-yr~ cavXa, A^A^Xr -^xJLXyZj GsZo ^fcv, /*S /t- 1 ^Uw<^ <-V^TxAx- ffiZZy dx-cV^ ZHZaZU^ ^ HZ ^ C^C,Zl JLP ix>^CtAUx ^■^<.'^ ^'Cx-£a-aA-a-'u / £ ^a cZ^j - cajZzz, HjfLu- o-^_ 'rfzZ /^cZ/ i~~/ H/jL4^Cy*^. '/i. oJL+^- ^ / ^-1^ -<^AA. I "~ "” UM^V G*jAyOC*U3j “fcv 4- ^i by ^y jfttZZ. b-tOz* L cK_ rZ^^^b^Zly^ x^-t-V. ^ i_0 " ^Ht^Zs^y yjZ^ HAAaa^^zCp ^Z^t~Ky*y< fvvtrvJ ^Xct^--ci Zz/l ^yfir - ' 4” ZZZZ >^L<_ hiAy_s t /fc •j^Zr cZC fc 0^Aj-iAf-1>^s4 ^lX-S?^L/_AVls7 Cj<^C zz~ ** ~£° ^ytyt^K 'l C*-*-^-^A-* .-^/ 6a-/ l/L ^ZXsXXAsf Z’if—C ^ ^’lX^*yZ / (-*^’ QlyXA^K. ^) &L/C i Q~Cy\f~~LA — [~\y t^c--t_-t J-y_A- Wayoit &-Za ■ * ^ aAA ~^a ^Va. y^/CcLi ^XV( ^vy C*Xa_ J'TsV'I-A k *' k x ~ y b l - 1 AAV.^ 7 i.. / t?*t‘ t i i-t l 'y" $y<-i.O k < t '-- 2 a-a> 7v-i^i_v °y tZZZ huxsi-ct ^ 'i y > ^ . fTv C / / yZ~~ 7? ZisCf4, j/^Z. Z ''7-^V ^Z kz jLu. frA-\ytl ^A X^M. 't^'l^'t'-fr-'VV' V-c- 7 5 )t^, //- l*i ^ JLjul^ 4 -^JT vamJX Z^T /y^yL ci lyXk* - d\y\ ^ (A** ^^y^ZK^^~y<. <-^ W^aaXvA; &^/7-^a^4aAA~^ ' * ih x l l «-* »/- ^ ’ y 77 x >7 Z< <^x»4, / . «v- o 7. ^ «i- <7 «X :7 '"y r * " '“* ' " v ^ •'— - ^ /» 7 — I_^v 'Jfa 'Kv *^V\AA, (/Iaa^XJ ^KZ- IaJ~^~~.s^s~~^ //-*. Xo.C y « i rx^L^C ^jj/yj / (b C\ /7 tWH QtZcrl^'lc) t If (TO I G-Wva-**^ Jo— , /y 11 ijoi 7x ^A)^cC 'L^-'-s&tZ, /^ // £> y <2-<5 oTT^ZZ^T CT'v^v 7 /W- .X - Zw? ' <7^ /Zu^Xvy ,7/ . 7 c; ■'•' / S "' W ) "■'' ' y^/ Us^~~t4X 0w Xy—.iyjX^w oA-okmJ74l 43/44777707 ■ yy4\ ( 3 S~J (^ /X/V ^ , fvux-hA c2eX . •£/ ^ y /^— o 7T //'iT' ' a ~ wl (A: Zx/ c^ vX ?,(*?!/ T 4 A 7 )A^rx> 4 , • , *y_/)-'^*s''.. V Ao rXAs «— (Krxyv. / eH> A a- Ir^ j C^vjsA> ~s\^ ^3~v-vX /^\s^A-^ ^y O A A - v3 O ^'tXA <7* ^ /, C/^Vv/V <^N_ XvA 4^/Vsfi-t^/f J " } y o.Ai'- f 'ii-~ j . — - L l^/oxr^A^y iruLf^ ^ ^vy?-x Ctr-v-t A 6 Y ^ 0 &\t<^L, ( Aj^Aa. ^J— l >\SU*-A.-*L- ^ ^ AV t»zT_z AZo ^/yXaa. ^1-X^lA X-- OSl-Aj C ^ 6^ ^Va. ‘^9-^xAA\ y ~TM—a- c l\^.A 'L vi^L, ^ M ^ ^ ttAA TX ^ v/ Aj-^aU'. Mr. Ifhnjrt, J L ^.V S / r L^~- 7-v^^ i ^ //- ^^ A. C ^J! C r ~js ' i /^ixaYhJ- c 7 z\_- /ua. /C? Birds -within Ten Miles of Point .(Ig Iv£ on”ts , Can, CoxQQau TVTA|»;pf ^221 34. Plectrophanes nivalis. Snow Bunting. — Very common in flocks in winter. Seen as late as the middle of May. BuiiN.O.O, 7, Oct, 1882 , p,23. f April 9tli I saw a flock of Snow Bunt- ings {Plectrophanes nivalis) in a stubble field near the outskirts of St. J ohn s. Most of them were in the black-and-white Sum- mer plumage. Vi**/ ^ ^ A //. ifKPltG'. / Q.& O. Vlll. June. 1383. p. ¥3 A Collecting Trip-Dec. 1887 . John Ewart, Yar Iter , Ont. Can. Snow Bunting. Saw two largo flocks. O.&O. XIII. June. 1888 p.94 Some Winter Birds of Nova Scotia. . J H ;V lorrell. 22. Passerina nivalis. Snowflake. — First seen at Parrsboro, Janu- ary 19. Not very common, but three to twelve birds found in a flock. AaK XVI, 99, p. Birds of N.E. coast of Labrador by Henry B . Bigelow . • Vo w Bunting. — Snow Buntings ap- 66. Plectrophenax nivalis. Sno after which they were peared at Port Manvers about the 10th of August, abundant. Ank, XIX, Jan., 1902, p.30* Plectrophenax nivalis. Snow Bunting.— This is the most easily recognized of any of our Fringillidas of either summer or winter. Their food consists of seeds of weeds and grasses, of which they get an abundant supply on haystacks. They are most abundant along river valleys. It has been alleged by some writers that Snow Buntings never perch on trees, but it is not uncommon to see them resting on trees when not feeding. Ank, XIX, April., 1902, La J 201. Passerina nivalis. Snowflake. — Winter migrant, usually abundant, October 10 to March 15 . lOf ■Winter Birds uf W abater, N . H. by F alco. Snow Bunting, ( PlectropTianes nivalis). O.SzO. X. Jan. 1885. p /y. Bird Notes, Central N.H. Winter ’©1-52 J. H. Johnson ! Snowflakes, seen occasionally. O.& O.Vol.l7,May 1892 p. 73 " Snow Bunting, <£. ,£ j rhvUM'. fflyeUvictiffitl' O.&O. X. Apr. 1885. ^ ,e i\ ' r'wvw' 7 . There has been a noticeable absence of the Snow Bunting;. Black-capped Chickadee, Pine Grosbeak here this Winter. ^ 2 . & J if£yuvC*rt*s. UO ^ O.&O. X. Apr. 1835. P.6i iC /-/ . /Vj-v/;A<.-0* . The Snow Bunting (Plectr&fmmiax nixalis) has been with us constantly since December, al- though no t near as common as usual. ®+(D.£v. tTUaU. f*10. f,. V 2 /nr 3o J\,^ X ltydULyJ C^£d ZZv Zum ^2frt*T«> a- ^^Ji^ '- - C*r^C <^£* A-v**v«? ^ ^ t tU v ir 6u*. / i«zzzu 'Z^U r Tfex tf>tl^lSiSTGLA-, tcdA^^j tc^py ^AAA^^C <^A^- )^1 <^-vO ^cctA^t- tjy l ^Vx-t*A_ct, ^-C^V^C<» tA/V*-^_ tj/-». /^-t*-A-A^C^y<7 Y^. . ( hr / y^ y. CA-^/y - tdc^_ ^X"^— >=-a_- ' s y^ tx^i^ ^ K*ul, TUjCy K-t VM_ ^-ce-L-tA. ^ 4- c_^ m/-uoJCx o«^i_^_ Snow Buntings have been here more than a month and I have seen large num- bers of Shore Larks. Several female Pine Grosbeaks have been seen, and one or two taken, but no males. — E. E. Rogers , Rock- port . , Mass. 0.40. Vin.FekGBSa.p. /£. Birds of Bristol County, Mass. F. W. Andros. Plectrophenax nivalis (Linn.), Snowflake. Winter visitant, irregular in appearance. More common on the coast than inland. O.&Q. XII. Sept. 1887 p.140 On January 26 a large flock of Snow Bunt- ings were seen by R. H. Carr at Brockton, Mass. O.&O.V 0 LI 8 , Feb. 1893 P.3Q Notes from Belchertown, Mass. J. W. Jackson Jan. 24, 26, large flocks of Snow Buntings ; O.&O.V 0 I.I 8 , Mar. 1893 p.45 |f ! 3 , JM,yj a E. Mass. 1884 , / /J, . E. Mass. 1885. 4- /(- ' 1 /*- /£ H 1 1 ^ - / 2 _ , /i’-fY •?/ . V A',*, . 7 V ^ ' X/ ta't'tAc'&f 30 ^ Vjtv*/, ZV E. Mass. 1885. Gpy. 21-23//. ra^o^4, /W ^/ — 1. 1 i lieat id. Mass. ^ ~OL 18S0. f- R SO ' 8 AT f..,..,/. Ir-tf-aC '(R7 fa-i^Crx^O °v ' ^IAAa. c 4 &- 6 J/A. xtr ^y^ot- ^■•.' VlAA , 3° ' 7«y. C/w_ 0\/i'*A/fcv tfd'i'iddLr & 0 / lA:yiy(> /czL- QTZoaUI. jJ)x^CA tf- n / 9/6 A. nsriv (AvLxrti i^ 3 ( A^cAAtAoJaA^Cvtcra^ nnsUxAuL rwsiraAiAu ) QTAiA c (tZl cA£(rxiy^ ^4 'nj'h Ax x i y, zxri^r c asvt, //H' 'Z' 1 '’ 9 'Z~ ( t 3 - / °J 0 If 'P- cAQ-e. ^ l/Ui^r-^ 4~e-e-~^ V^V^ j^ x '^J- Vul^^ , ^ 3o ^ 5 ^— v ^,'7 oL U 0\/l^i^CZ/ tf3AA4?t4s rCL^J O^UAJs^tcyV 0?LzuUl. )J)a^cs J-f- / 9/ 0 izisVlslMv r^uiwX^L rtMswajtcdu ) QT'i/ld, <%. Q9^Lz£&syl/.' Ax x. I y, Ha^i. /9> 7' - 9 ^-3- //y Canada Buntings. — W. "W. Coe, Portland, Conn., reports, Nov. 14th, first flock of Buntings. Two were shot. O.&O. Vlll. Jan. 1882. p * ,, Birds observed in Naval Hospital • Grounds, Brooklyn, G.B.Oo u©s 37. Plectrophanes nivalis. Snow-Bunting. — Common at times in winter. Boil. N.O.O. 4, Jan., 1879, p.32 Birds of the Adirondack Region. C.H.Merriton. 6i. Plectrophanes nivalis {Linn.') Meyer. Snow Bunting.— C om- mon in flocks in winter. Bull N.O.O. «,Qct, 1881, p, 220 W <*up, MM, ^LLUu ueCrXy tA^r^L^lru/' ~Uue -ywrrit S&, VfMn i J / K-£-6LsC >Z ^Ce>~rMU y CZ^. &x ~ZZZZZ^ Q y^y^~ ^ txo^Cy. "^ U ^~ ‘~' t*- ^Co. l<^^ c£- ^<_ZZE7 -L. Lm^^A, - ^^ZZy * /. Cr 'i^A. 7 ~&Za. r Y^X, _ ^JT /Z^c? (Z-v^L^J. <^l oh-JJ-Z-y ^^JlJ (^ <2L, J "tzzzy ZZai-Zc L^ Zcs *5C_ ?ZZu p<^zzr Y2L. i- C4L_ ~ZZ^jy - For the past two weeks Sn&w Buntings liave been very plenty and in very large flocks. 0,&0« XVI. Jam 1891* p.l5 £ A I J\ *V ^ ^ ^ 4 / ^ ^4 A Vi S» N Nf ■ « y wV! 4 ^ ^ ^ /’-«. y< 2 >«^, / /; / /fro 3 $~£t^O~^- ~t*J*-m ^ i" R 30 ':r°8 J? l^ooL. Jo Jj y^J'tr-cJ'L ; « j 0 C -^><0 " Q •03 I — I bS . t/J J> « a, c a; *+s4 « tf> X §) <£ ■S v -Cv, Vi* - fen® 55 « ”3 « f> < 4 J ' . ^ -4 a, O 5 6 & 1 4 - cq ^ /^ 6 ^. K«^U MAI i^A. 0 • _ /C. 7 — ' *— h^-^a . |3aa ,3. A/. u/^A. . /‘V £mx^^ H ^^r ’ntlll ' * 9traam ' v°i- 34 .»«/■<../-'<■■/. /Z 2 , /} ^ lJL£+. *C <*-* d^-^SC^. c^cLJ , () ^*7 v^ j!x^c~ 'QriA-A-e^Z^ *. J Vle^ UC. Ct^Jl XV, 6*%./ %?%,//, j'7-3z<<. v9-_/) (if' y//^^ // • TA ~~^ZZLi iaaa. 77 *A. A-*- gy a L 'O<fJl (^/ 2 \ArvC-A> . fL/ 6vv. -^AaA ut^eJUy ^ !o eh^j ^T '&**> $&u^yuJt*'iAy tLfiMq %A*srJZi Sj /LmIk> . /A- ^-mO TSj«> ^lt) *~v e-t^ 2J4~?E~L*i+ e^. -tK. ^Ji *w ^ I'filtfafS $/* .Ja*^ && or c, ~^jjjtLAA4 Uco± ~T37y ch w(3r fa-TuX* (5^/ **“ yim}*- %fu~+s^! cLb^J^ AJL D^jhA-tM-, ^jT>v. / j Ljs^ 0~^ ^ 7 "~ "" ^ 1? / ~‘ a CC\ aj ^^CLa_a^-> « cL^xt^ f$K-Kj t*rX*. a*»^L ILtaaA(si f Oi’-. /m $jr,%SLif "£n 4>Aaa t/rAZi^v (jtfJpC 'J/U X ~ A ‘ . &&L- ~UZ* d-XJ^. &j A*S! AM*wti a-C * °05u 2j0 ~fcju^ ^ jyL*-iM. ^ §^kJ~i oJaa*-*^ Mi fim.ytl L ^v At-c^C Y"' ^ 'tbcZiJt, ’VuZy u«^ X-4w^ <>«>vv />-a — & r4-v~ M*Aa . T/i /lf^*+AJlA-4AlLs ^tAT^-W^C CT^a. . &JC 2$C3i ^uX^_, ~1X7X7a. v^rvx*- ■ { cLaA> wirtT t *~* 3 T TJZAaaa . Xv-^ sy ^ — , jfifcl ~f\ AaaJ inry 7 _ ^x^t, ^U.t« ^ ■ oUajTX by 7277^ A J .At'-‘Ls^s? '£ 2 ^ A J A_ r , . > . /? . 7T~ , ^ rr I ( ) SX. Hi ' . c t ( 6 r o^L c { j^. J .l -^..1 a J^_ *. ^ ^-o~~Vv_ p **_0 ~w*_ -Co ^ -A-\_ A-tfL 6 l©-> < 2 — de. Ylw X.O-C C ^ w *- ClL-^Ar- Ok_pp*ji ^U-*--V- ow<_o S_<. ^ p— ^-JU- j?_ U U-, CLq, Vb VUjl. Q» 5" "p- , • S"*^ ^ saj4JLwLo cv. o^r^iiLA^ ^^>. ji . ■o < 0 >^ r 3 s&-w«fcJL ^ ° ^ - «p- ~ 3 A C^^sT Ow cU^, _ -YW (Usu^t ^JU. oJU-^w^V *5- t> » i*-*? d-Cr^^iy. - 4_0 1 _-^e^v4- < sv-*->— ~W a -^f : eu^j^o u^rCdU oJ^ a>- a^-cL a^gA- ( (X-w^C ^ < • » -*■ - ■^ ■ ■^- oJLa . o YUu &*JLs0 QjL^Ar- ^ A-^~C^_y ■ ^l^t(/TA. 3"L->. '*~ , ^ v - t ~~ (A- bu^i^iu-A. xt^to 'irzKcJ^. -bo _ J )• ' w ^-° — oc^£ yUe^s. rL-c, -c^jUul. o~o»_ 4~ ^>1^1 ^l«i ll ^-^tdl^ Qj)r- X-e^A- '-^~~ "^fl-^vi <3 ^r^j J^CA Vl^JL. £5-^^ ! I dL-oC £x_<^? — ' — ^ Jrwv ^ < ’ ~ 'S. A— o vA *-i « ■* .^AjlA‘'^ / 4s ^^ (SliiL -*-v M /W_ 3 &\^c*JlJi^ tj-c, ^^v-v--^ ^->r(L^x^ -t— 4 *— *-C<} $20. Rare Birds in Ontario. By John A. Morden. Ibid., II, pp. 162, 163. — Relates chiefly to the Lapland Longspur, at Mitchel s Bay, Ont. Owe* import & Naturalist mrcia -within Ten Miles of Point de Monts, Can, Comeau&Merriam 35. Centrophanes lapponicus. Lapland Longspur. — Large flocks of this species appear on this part of the coast during the latter part of April, remaining till about the middle of May. They are then very abun- dant, occurring both alone and in flocks with the preceding. Bali N, 0,0, 7,Oct, X882, p,S35 Records from Toronto. B.B.T.Setou. Lapland Longspur. Plectrophanes lapponicus. — Indi viduals of this species have occurred in company with P. niva Its almost every winter as far back as the records here extend. Auk, 2, Oct., 1885, p.384 Birds of N.B. coast of Labrador by Henry B. Bigelow. 67. Calcarius lapponicus. Lapland Longspur. — Common after Aug- ust 3. Breed about Nachvak and northward to Hudson Straits. South of Nachvak they occur only as migrants. Auk, XIX, Jan., 1902, p.30. (iLo cly] ^ [ ^6. AV 6CCU. hiiX44. 1 ^trf-A-xA J /fas: I yfov. XV (yCC cI^l^vtxJL- Z» - <^-y r ha <2eT^y^A3<_^^' *~uJ!ZZ V%A-cKx^6e-~^ t^-<^_ *1- / x*-'S^>- '^mao«4^ \uZ~ *x^C& k~ dr ZZC^ ^a-xx.x€. Arx-d- ^9 x[ZZ 1xmAA f $~hstr-i^ <^~AA^Ca i^mu*AsC~ Vocaa***A+*a 4 f " /, jL£>~ )- ^//uka*. «6e^, O^VWaaaX*- •&-^JL i^oj w-O _ ^6uX^, ^Uv_ MA^kx/AC' — 4 ^ /^3 - '^CAA^yj KrtAx. /W -Jjlnl < / 1> fy~L*yC //j t- rKA^A o£iaAs ^5^5^ ^vX^c^y 4^-v-v_ tv/ S^iyA^uX b/-f-iyt^xX ^-4VtS ~*-' — /^»-t d $- tZZi \ • A’ Z7 i, /^t cTy£r-zZ ( ^/ P f’.AlZ.Z ')^ t L^<£{Z ~AlT ^~J &^V-C^v. ~~£TZT Isi/ir^sv. 'V C*~jr£Zi7 *-\^ ^Cfr-iA/K. ^ \5 0 /T '-'Z-t^i t*)A\si_xsA v/L^*- *^i^eC^Jiy o~^ ~£ .T^ ^ djLJL*y*~ ~tZb - ‘Tck^^ j, ^ . 3 0 Aj^s^k^A- ~Av^, The Occurrence of the Lapland Longspur ( Calcar ius lafifto7iicus) in Mid-winter in Massachusetts. — On January 12, 1902, the writer, with Mr. H. M. Spelman and Mr. R. S. Eustis, found between forty and fifty of these birds at Ipswich. Four or five were on a hillside about half a mile from the beach, and the remainder among the sand-dunes by the sea. The day was stormy and cold, the fine snow blowing and drifting so that the beach grass on which they were feeding was more or less covered. Perhaps on this account the birds were tamer than usual and allowed a close approach. The Longspurs were alone, and also associated with Horned Larks and Snow Buntings. Three Ipswich Sparrows were seen with them. It is not uncommon to find the Longspurs in the early part of Decem- ber in Ipswich. Thus I have records for December 10, 1898, and Decem- ber 8, 1901. — Cha Mass. p. , The Lapland Longspur Wintering in Massachusetts. — In our 1 Birds of Massachusetts’ (1901), Mr. Reginald Heber Howe, Junior, and the undersigned, gave, as the only instance known to us of the wintering of the Lapland Longspur in the State, the record of one from Ipswich, Jan. 6, 1877. This specimen with above date on the label, is preserved in the mounted collection of the Boston Society of Natural History. By a mere chance the fact came out that this specimen, which was presented by Messers. E. A. & O. Bangs, was probably from the same lot of birds, bought at the Boston Market, from which came the McCown’s Longspur, credited by Mr. C. J. Maynard to Massachusetts. It appears that the market-man of whom the specimens were obtained, when asked if they came from Ipswich, replied, as he naturally would, in the affirmative, and it seems reasonable to believe that these two birds were in reality from the West, and that there are no actual winter records for the State. Lately, however, Mr. Howe, in company with Mr. Louis Agassiz Shaw, while at Ipswich on the 18th of January, 1902, took one, and saw at least five others, so that we are now able to give the species unquestioned standing as of at least occasional occurrence in Massachusetts in winter. While on. three trips to Ipswich during the autumn of 1901 (Oct. 22, Nov. 9 and 28) Mr. Howe found Longspurs in unusual abundance, and apparently, as this season has been comparatively mild, a proportion have remained to winter with the Snow Buntings and Horned Larks.— Glover M. Allen, Cambridge. Mass. - Afik, XIX April., 1902, pp ■ ZoX-Z°3. Laplan d L ongspu n. A female ( Centro - phanes lapponicus) was shot in this vicin- ity, Jan. 26, 1883, by Mr. Charles H. Neff. It was alone in a barren field . — John H. Sage , Portland, Gonn.Ot&O. V1U. June, 1883. p. Vi- Good Shot. — R. N. Denison secured at one shot, near the mouth of the Connecti- cut River, the middle of February, three L apland Long-spurs , and one Tree Sparrow. two Shore Larks „ „ , , O.&o. Vlll. May. 1883. p. 3 k. Loag Island Bird Notes. Wm.Dutcher 18. Calcarius lapponicus. Lapland Longspur. — This boreal species, usually so rare, seems to have been in a roving mood during the winter of 1884-85. At Far Rockaway Beach, Queens Co., February 7, 1885, while on a collecting trip with Dr. A. K. Fisher, one was secured by him as it was flushed from the short beach grass where we were looking for Ipswich Spai- rows. February 26, 1885, several flocks of from six to ten indi- viduals were found by Mr. W. F. Hendrickson on some filled-in roads, running through what was formerly a swamp, in the upper part of Long Island City, Queens Co. They were in company with a few Snowflakes and Horned Larks. Two days later he saw a few scattered Longspurs and one mixed flock of Longspurs, Horned Larks, and a few Snowflakes. This flock, he says, con- tained about twenty or twenty-five Longspurs. They were very wild and difficult of approach. Four were secured and preserved. All were males and were in good condition. This Arctic wave must have been receding, as no more were seen, although Mr Hendrickson carefully looked for them in the same and other lo- calities many times subsequently. As from a receding wave one often sees a fleck of foam left lightly resting on the beach, so must this bird-wave have left one of its number on the Hempstead Plains (Queens Co.), where it was found and shot by Mr. A. H. Hawley, April 18, 1885. Auk, 3, Oct., 1883, p. Lf / 1 On the same day (Feb. 16) my brother found a flock of eleven Lapland Longspurs ( Calcarius lapponicu s), one of which he shot. When first seen they were by themselves, but when shot at became mixed with a flock of thirty Shore Larks which began to quarrel with them as soon as they alighted, evidently try ing to drive them away. This made the Long- spurs restless and no more were shot. Next day (Sunday) my brother and I, armed only with an opera glass, went to look for more Longspurs. When coming over the edge of a small hill I flushed a flock of about a dozen Shore Larks, and noticed as they flew straight away from me that one bird in the flock had a noticeably white tail, similar to that of the Chestnut-collared Longspur mentioned above. This flock flew a hundred yards or so and alighted among a number of large boulders, and although I examined the ground carefully from a distance of forty yards or so (as near as- 1 was able to get) I could not find the bird with the white tail. Upon trying to approach closer they flew sidewise to me, so that I cbuld not see the tail-feathers very well, and went too far for us to follow them. On top of the hill I found one Lapland Longspur and approached within about thirty feet of it, when it took wing and, when flying, was joined by two more of its species and a couple of Shore Larks. The Lapland Long- spurs when flying with Shore Larks resemble the latter • so closely that they can only be distinguished by their note, which is so different that no mistake can possibly be made. On Feb. 18 my brother found a flock of about forty Shore Larks, con- taining a few Lapland Longspurs, two of which he shot. On the 20th a few Lapland Longspurs were seen with a flock of Shore Larks, but were so wild that they were given up after about three hours of persistent hunt- ing. On Feb. 22, my brother, a friend, and myself were out and saw two Lapland Longspurs in a flock of forty or fifty Shore Larks. They were very wild and flushed out of range, but flew back past us, when I recog- nized one of the Longspurs by its call and shot it. We have, seen none since the 22d, although we have been over the ground on which they were found several times.— W. F. Hendrickson, Long Island City, N. T. Auk, VI. April, 1889. p. # US' Bird « otes from Long Island, N.Y< William Dataller. 19. Calcarius lapponicus. Lapland Longspur. — One shot at Long Island City, Queens Co., January 11, 18S6, by John Hendrickson, is the only record I have secured since those noted in ‘The Auk’ of October, 1886.* This specimen was in company with four Horned Larks. “It had but one leg, the left one having been cut off : the wound was entirely healed.” Mr. Giraud considered this bird an extremely rare straggler. “In, the winter of 1838, several specimens of this bird were observed in the New York markets, having been shot on Long Island — but I am not aware that this species has ever before or since been met with in our section. ”f From my records made thus far I cannot consider individuals of this species in the light of stragglers. Further observations, made on the beaches and grassy plains, may prove them to be regular, but not common, visitants, as in Massachusetts. J Auk, V, April, 1888. p.181 * Auk, Vol. Ill, 1886, p. 440. f Birds of Long Island, 1844, p. 99. X See A Revised List of the Birds of Massachusetts. By J. A. Allen. Bull. Amer. Mus. N. H., Vol. 1, No. 7, July, 1886, p. 250. Bird Notes from Long Island, William Dutcher. N.Y. n. Calcarius lapponicus. Lapland Longspur. — Mr. John Hendrick- on shot one October 18, 1888, at Long Island City. He informs me that it was alone, and was secured as it flew up from among some weeds growing on the edge of a drain. From the fact that Horned Larks ( Oto - coris alpestris) were first seen that day, he thinks it not unlikely that the Longspur had migrated southward in their company. This is the earli- est autumn date of which I have any record. Auk, VI. April. 1886*. P. Ul. Birds of the Adirondack Region. C.H.Merriam. 62. Centrophanes lapponicus (. Linn .) Cabanis. Lapland Long- spur. — Occurs with the last, but is not so common. Bull. N.O.O. Q, Oct, 1881, p,229 ISC, SomeAOC. Bis. Booth. OrwnUnd.mw, A. «d. byM.ChMoWrlain. Calcarius lapponicus. Lapland Longspur. — In the vicinity of Ivig- tut this is the least numerous of the four species of singing birds that occur. The relative numbers are about one Longspur to five Wheatears, ten Snowflakes, and ten or fifteen Redpolls. In 1886 the first spring comers were seen on May 24, and in 1887 on May 22. The favorite nesting site is in flat, moist ground covered with grass or low bushes. Mr. Hagerup has not seen any nests at a higher elevation than some 200 feet. In Ivigtut valley, which contains about one third of an English square mile, some six or eight pairs were breeding during the summer of 1887. A nest discovered on June 16 was placed in deep moss in a moist spot in the valley, on the outskirts of a willow thicket, and in the vicinity of water. It was composed exteriorly of dried grass and roots, and lined with white Ptarmigan’s feathers. In it were seven eggs slightly incubated. On July 3 a young bird, that could hardly fly, was captured by a dog. This species has several alarm notes and calls of which the principal is a rather pleasing, though sad, flute-like note resembling tloo or tlue. The song, which sounds best when the bird, after mounting up in the sky, drops slowly to the earth with extended motionless wings, is not very long, but has a fine, flute-like tone, and though agreeable to the ear is rather melan- choly, as all the notes of this bird are. There is no variation in the song, nor is it repeated with great frequency. It is, however, the finest heard in these wilds. The Longspur, like all the song birds of the far north, is quite tame and fearless of man. but is less frequently seen in the immediate vicinitv of the houses at Ivigtut than the other species are. ABk.TI. 6ct. ,1660, P . 196 - x<11 . The Migratory Movements of the Lapland Longspurs in North Amer- ica- — The winter migratory movements of the Lapland Longspur ( Cal - caruis lapponicus) have been little understood by me, or by those persons whom I have consulted. I have, to satisfy myself, during the past month gathered together all obtainable data for North America, and have been thus able to explain their seemingly erratic movements, and I present the results thinking they may interest others. The Lapland Longspur ( Calcarius lapponicus ) and the Alaskan Long- spur (C. 1 . alascensis) breed in North America approximately north of the 6oth parallel from Ungava (Nachvak) to Alaska, the subspecies being confined to the country west of the 120th meridian. They nest during the months of June and July, reaching their breeding grounds in late May. By the last of August (Aug. 20) they begin their southward migration across southern Canada, occurring most abundantly in the central portions of their route (Manitoba). This is true of both their southward and northward journeys. They reach southern Labrador, Manitoba, and British Columbia in September, occurring in these locali- ties apparently only as fall and spring migrants. After entering the United States the ranks of Calcarius lappotiicus become more crowded into the central States as the eastern and western limits of their migra- tory route narrow, determined by the Alleghany and Rocky mountains. Stragglers only reach the Atlantic coast south of Ipswich, Massachusetts, and there are no records for the Alaskan Longspur south of Canada on the Pacific coast, the Cascade and Sierra Nevada mountains proving an effectual barrier, as this subspecies is not recorded from California to my knowledge but seems to migrate down between the Rocky and the last named mountains through the Great Basin, and wanders during the winter to Colorado and western Kansas. Along the 47th parallel (Mon- tana, North Dakota, Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Michigan) the Lapland Longspur is a late September and October migrant, while to the south of the 40th parallel it occurs as a winter resident in large numbers as far south as the 37th parallel, occurring even occasionally in northern Texas (Gainsville). The wedge shape of the southern migration between the east and west mountain ranges explains why the Longspurs do not occur regularly all along the southern Pacific coast and on the Atlantic coast south of Massachusetts: a puzzle in the latter case, as formerly viewed from my local standpoint of Massachusetts alone.- The spring northward migration is exactly the reverse of the south- ward fall movement, the birds reaching the 47th parallel in late March, April and even May, and the 55th parallel in May. As is the case with all birds during their migrations, stragglers are left along the way either from exhaustion, injury or for less apparent reasons, so that we have winter record’s for Nova Scotia, Vermont and Wisconsin, due to some of the above causes, and for the same reasons we also have late May records for Longspurs in the southernmost States in which they winter. — Reginald Heber Howe, Jr., Long-wood, Mass. Auk, XVIII, Oct., 1901, pf>- 3 f 6 , 397 - Occurrence of Calcarius ornatus in Maine. — Early on the morning of August 13, 1886, while sitting in a blind on the Little River marshes, near Pine Point, Me., I noticed a small bird flying restlessly about overhead. From its peculiar flight and notes I took it to be a Titlark. Rather surprised to see one so early in the season, I watched it carefully, and, when it Anally alighted not far away, I went after it. My attempt to secure it was un- successful, however, owing to my gun missing fire, and it flew off to the other side of the river, where I lost sight of it. Several hours later, while returning by the same place, I saw what was presumably the same bird, flying about from one place to another. Finally I fired at it, as it rose from the grass before me, and had the pleasure of seeing it fall. I must confess that on picking it up I was completely at a loss to know what it was. I did not feel sure regarding it till several months later, when looking over one day, in company with Mr. Chadbourne, the large series of Calcarius ornatus in the Agassiz Museum at Cambridge, we discovered one specimen which matched my bird in every particular. Mr. Brewster, to whom I showed it later, identified it as ornatus without doubt. The bird is of very small size, and, as far as plumage goes, lacks, with the exception of the tail-markings, every sign of belonging to this species. It is apparently a young male, though the sex could not positively be determined.— Joseph L. Goodale, Cambridge , ^ Jan 1887 *7f- /Vo A New Bird to Massachusetts. — Mr. Charles W. Townsend, of Boston,- shot, July 28, 1876, a male specimen of Plectrophanes ornatus. It was taken in Magnolia, near Gloucester, Mass., in a field near the sea- shore, and has been by Mr. Townsend presented to the New England col- lection of the Boston Natural History Society. It is an adult male, in worn plumage. — T. M. Brewer, Boston, Mass. BulX N. O.O. 2i July, 1877. p. 7 $. Chestnut-collared and Lapland Longspurs on Long Island, N. Y. —While huntingfor Lapland Longspurs on February 16, my brother, J. H. Hen.dnckson, saw a bird which, on account of white feathers in its tail and generally dingy appearance, he thought was a Bay-winged Sparrow. He approached within five or six feet and hit it with a small stone, when it flew a short distance and he shot it. Upon examination I found it to be a Chestnut-collared Longspur ( Calcarius ornatus ). It was found near the end of a filled-in, sandy road extending about six hundred feet into a salt marsh, and was entirely alone, no other birds being found within some distance of it. Upon skinning the bird I found it to be in good condition, slightly fat. I could not determine the sex. Upon reporting the above to Mr. William Dutcher, he informed me that it was not only a new record for Long Island (as I had supposed), but was the second record for the Eastern United States, the other being one taken in Massa- chusetts in July, 1876 {vide Brewer, Bull. Nuttall Ornith. Club, Vol. II, p. 7^)1 an d as such it \^ill no doubt prove interesting. Cv .J 1 . ^ C^J\ J v/, ) s sy _ ji ./jo Descriptions of First Plumag-e of Cer- tain North Am, Bbs. Wm. Brewster* 59. Plectrophanes ornatus. First plumage: female. Above light reddish-brown, every feather streaked centrally with very dark brown, most heavily so upon the crown. Greater and middle wing-coverts pale ashy, tinged with reddish. Lores and superciliary stripes dull gray, the latter minutely dotted with brown. Under parts pale fulvous, streaked somewhat finely with brown upon the breast and jugulum, with a maxillary series of spots of the same color. From a specimen in my cabinet, collected by Dr. Coues, September 3 1 873, at Souris River, Dakota, gpll, N . O . C . 3, July >18 i o. p« Dec. 1889.] AND OOLOGIST. 185 June 11th, was placed in a clump of mullen, on top of a little bank. This contained but three eggs, and as I knew that incubation had begun several days, it was not molested. On the 27tli of May I also collected another set of four eggs on a neighboring farm. This nest was also placed at the root of a mullen, and \was in its form and the marking of its eggs so like those of a Song Sparrow that it would '.have been difficult to identify them if the bird had not been seen. Several, other new nests were located in a swampy burn, but before their sets of eggs were completed they were destroyed by some small animal or bird. Anoth/r nest, whose set of four eggs were among' the most beautifully mottled that I' have seen, was collected by my son from a tuft of grass in a deep tamarac swamp on the 12th of June, he having, to make identity certain, shot the bird. The last nest of .this species that I noticed this season was on the 12tli of July. I had flushed the bird nesting, and on that date four days after the first egg had been deposited found that it Contained but two eggs which the bird was incubating, and I did not molest them nor disturb her again. This nest was placed at tlie f root of a small black ash, among tall, wild grass, and formed chiefly of fine dry grass, ^but the eggs were the darkest in color of any that I had yet sXen. The middle of May appears to be the earliest time for this species tb nest, but some years ago I took a set of three eggs, incubation begun, on the 4th of Augdst. William L. Kells. Listo-v^el, Ontario, Canada. [No one, except a very ignorant person, would mistake the eggs of the White- throated Sparrow for those of the Song Sparrow, as they are so much larger than the latter in addition to the difference in their general ap- pearance. Normal eggs of the Song Sparrow measure about .75x,55, while those of the Wliite-tliroated Sparrow (normal specimens) abe about .84x.68. — J. P. N.] Nesting of the Chestnut-collared Longspur. While on a recent collecting trip in Lac-qui- Parle County, Minnesota, an excellent oppor- tunity presented itself for the observation of the nesting habits of the Chestnut- collared Longspur ( Calcarius ornatus). Let me give you what information I gathered while there. On the 12th of May, 1889, the day I arrived at Madison, the county seat, I observed the birds in every field. They were apparently mated, and seemed greatly excited when I ap- proached their particular section. Each pair had established themselves in a certain portion of ground, and there raised their brood. Al- though I hunted diligently during that day and the day after, and for a week or more, I could find no nests. I looked in tall grass, and short grass, and places where there was no grass at all. I tried watching the female bird, but gave that up and was slowly becoming disappointed at my ill luck, when, on May 20tli, as I was riding home about noon with a farmer, I saw a female Longspur flying across the prairie with a piece of grass in her bill. Presently she alighted and walked a short distance, and then stopped, and after fussing about a little, she flew away again, but without the piece of grass she had carried there. Guessing what she was doing, I went over to where she had been, and sure enough, there was the beginning of a nest. It was a shallow hole, scooped out in the ground, which was just receiving its lining of grass and reed stems. Both birds soon came around, and flew nervously about, keeping up a plain- tive twittering sound. I told the farmer he need not wait for me, so I walked about for quite a distance to observe their actions. As soon as the birds had quieted down the male began to soar high up in the air, and when at its greatest height would begin its pe- culiar little song, and then with wings almost touching behind his back, would come tum- bling down, as if overcome with the ecstacy of his own music, never ceasing the strain until he alighted on the ground. While thus singing he would always settle near the nest as he came down. With this information gained I started home, resolving to revisit the nest at a later date; but I never did this, for some reason. The next morning (May 21st) I was out early, looking for Longspurs’ nests. I first went to a piece of ground where I always had heard a male singing whenever I passed the place; and as I came in sight this time he was still there. After watching him go through his peculiar singing performance several times, I decided about the spot the nest must be located, and started for it on the run, making as much noise as possible, hoping to flush the bird directly from the nest. As I came upon the place, sure enough, out she went from almost under variations oi plumage he describes were also noticed. A single female was taken having a dis- tinct chestnut collar, and many of the males had the black of the° breast streaked with chestnut. They were evidently nesting, and a very pro- longed search finally revealed a nest which contained young half grown. It was placed upon the ground in the short prairie-grass, and very difficult to find even when the locality was once known. It was sunk on a level with the ground, and was composed of fine dry grasses very similar to the nest of the Shore Lark (E. alpestris'). Internal diameter of nest 2 [ inches ; depth about 2. The female fluttered away exhibiting the utmost concern, and acting as if severely wounded. Bull, N.O.O, 5 , Jan,, 1880, p,14 144 ORNITHOLOGIST [Yol. 14-No. 12 186 my feet. Looking down, I saw the cosy nest containing a fine set of five eggs. The nest was almost exactly like that of a Shore Lark, being sunken flush with the sur- face of the ground. It was lined with some bleached grasses and weed stems. The rim was quite thick and turned inward, which made the nest look smaller than it really was. It was built in an open place, close to a well-travelled road; and although there was no grass nor weeds to conceal it, it was very difficult to see while a few feet away. I attempted to take out the lining of the nest, but it fell to pieces and I could not lift it. I went somewhat further on, and soon espied a singing male. This time my running tactics failed, for the bird flushed wild ahead of me; but now knowing where to look for a nest, I found it, after a few minutes’ search, close to a large white stone, which was the only one in sight, the birds using it, perhaps, for a land- mark. This nest also contained five eggs. The nest was identical with the one first found, and in fact all of those I found, while there, were very similar, both in location and struc- ture, a description for one will suffice for all. The next day (May 22d) I found two more nests in similar locations, each containing four eggs, and on the 23d I found three more sets of four eggs each, all of which were found on a patch of burnt ground. On the 29tli I found another set of five, but the location of the nest was different from all the others, it being placed in a bunch of grass and well concealed. On the same day I also found two more nests, one containing two and the other three eggs, which were left for com- plete sets, but on returning on the 29tli the set of three had not increased in number, while the nest of two eggs had been burnt over by a recent fire; but what surprised me most was two little downy Longspurs that greeted me with open mouths as 1 came up. This nest was so deeply imbedded in the ground that the flames probably swept over it and left the eggs uninjured. I do not believe the bird could have protected them at the time. These were the last nests I found, as I left Madison on the 31st of May. The eggs are peculiar, — quite unlike any others I have seen, but somewhat resembling those of the Grass Finch in the clouded appear- ance of the shell-markings, and having the dull white ground color of those of a Lark Finch. None of the nests contained eggs of the Cow- bird. The small birds of that district are very free from the intrusions of this parasite, as I saw very few of the birds and found none of their eggs in any nest that I came across. George G. Cantwell. Lake Mills, Wis. [Seven of the sets above referred to by Mr. Cantwell, together with another set collected in a different locality, are now before me, and may be thus described: Set I. May 22, 1886, Huron, Dakota. Col- lected by E. S. Cheney. Nest, a hollow in the ground, lined with fine grass, placed beside manure on a hillside. Three eggs, incubation begun. Pinkish-wliite, speckled with burnt umber, and also veined with a few lines of seal brown: .78x.56; .78x.54; ,78x.57. (This.set is described in Davie’s Nests and Eggs, 1889, page 296.) Set II. May 23, 1889, Lac-qui-Parle County, Minn. Collected by Geo. G. Cantwell. Nest composed of bleached grass and weed stems, sunken flush with the surface of the surround- ing prairie. Four eggs, incubation begun. Greenish-white, spotted sparingly, but dis- tinctly, with clove brown. There are a few under shell markings of cinereous. The spots are evenly distributed all over the surface: ,76x.55; .76x.55; .73x.55; .72 x .54. Set III. May 23, 1889, Lac-qui-Parle County, Minn. Collected by Geo. G. Cantwell. Nest composed of bleached grass and weed stems, sunken flush with the surface. Four eggs, fresh. Greenish-white, speckled and spotted with Vandyke brown and seal brown, with a few under shell markings of cinereous. These spots are heaviest around the larger ends: .70 x.65; ,70x,55; .67x.54; .67x.54. Set IV. May 23, 1889, Lac-qui-Parle County, Minn. Collected by Geo. G. Cantwell. Nest composed of grass and weed stems, sunken flush with the surface of the surrounding plaijis. Four eggs, fresh. Light greenish- white, speckled and spotted all over the sur- face with burnt umber. There are also under shell markings of drab-gray, and a few vein, ings of seal brown: .77 x .57; .75 x .58; .75 x .."8; .74 x .59. Set V. May 29, 1889, Lac-qui-Parle County, Minn. Collected by Geo. G. Cantwell. Nest composed of grass and weed stems, sunken flush with the surface of the prairie. This nest was found on the 23d of May, with three eggs, and no more were deposited by the 29tli. Three eggs, incubation advanced. Greenish-white, spotted and veined with burnt umber. There are also numerous under shell markings of cin- ereous: .73x.56; .75 x.57; .72x.56. Set VI. May 22, 1889, Lac-qui-Parle County, Dec. 1889.] AND OC Minn. Collected by Geo. G. Cantwell. Nest composed of bleached grass and weed stems, sunken flush with the surface of the surround- ing prairie. Four eggs, incubation slight. Ecru-drab ground color, clouded with light purplish shell markings, veined and spotted with seal brown: ,77x.55; .73x.56; ,73x.56; .75 x .57. Set VII. May 26, 1889, Lac-qui-Parle County, Minn. Collected by Geo. G. Cantwell. Nest composed of grass and weed stems. Placed in a clump of grass on the prairie. .Five eggs, fresh. Greenish-white ground color, clouded with drab and speckled and spotted with seal brown: .75 x .58; .72 x .56; .71 x .55; .69 x .56- .73 x .58. Set VIII. May 22, 1889, Lac-qui-Parle County, Minn. Collected by Geo. G. Cantwell. Nest j composed of bleached grass and weed stems, sunken flush with the surface of the surrounding prairie: ,71x.54; ,73x.55; ,78x,57; ,73x 55 z J :Wo . XIV, Dec. 1889 p, | Birds of Grant and Traverse Cos. Minn, June, 1878 Roberts & Benner 19. Flectrophanes ornatus, Towns. Chestnut-collared Bunting. — The birds of this species were first noted upon the prairie about a mile from Herman, where their circular flight and characteristic song attracted attention at once. They, were found from here westward to the bluffs bor- dering Brown s Valley, but did not descend into it. They at all times pre- ferred the prairie away from any moist places, and were not found near sloughs nor lakes. Mr. J. A. Allen’s description of their habits, as quoted in Coues s u Birds of the Northwest,” coincides so exactly with our experi- ence that a detailed account is unnecessary. The variations of plumage he describes were also noticed. A single female was taken having a dis- tinct chestnut collar, and many of the males had the black of the° breast streaked with chestnut. They were evidently nesting, and a very pro- longed search finally revealed a nest which contained young half grown. It was placed upon the ground in the short prairie-grass, and very difficult to find even when the locality was once known. It was sunk on a level with the ground, and was composed of fine dry grasses very similar to the nest of the Shore Lark (E. alpeslris ). Internal diameter of nest inches ; depth about 2. The female fluttered away exhibiting the utmost concern, and acting as if severely wounded. Bull, N.O.O. 5, Jan., 1880, p,14 1 44 Acanthi s browsterii . See Ridg., Am. Nat. July, 1872, 433, Vol.Yl. » » Pr. U. 3. Nat. Mus. Vlll, 1885, 354. (B— , C 147, R 180, C 211.) Cf. Brewst. Bull. Nutt. Orn. Club, VI, 1881, p.225. See also A. 0. U. Chech List of North American Birds. 2nd Ed. Hypothetical List, pp. 330-1. Llr. William Brewster of Cambridge, Mass, obtained this specimen, which remains unique, at Waltham, Mass, Nov. 1st, 1870, from a floch of Ac an this 1 inaria of which he also hilled six specimens at the same shot