- +e Agen 9 AL OURAN: Ye rh eI bat ean Se OPO2ey. 4 - eatntrrveness tote he hotel aa te ye waits 400) Perey ms © sows ‘ ot, J i T roo . ” 0 Here PEP ener yaar 9rd it ee eer Ppreriomarne ar eee Png 5 TAS r Hb ohne’ he eethet OF ertrenrcepee oe | - Poothas e Wo hs i ath gn gegen eee S08 Bee nn palahdbanegarwen ao te orpe . bedad y ‘ i . peaeyes bade perieePhene-++ Minty Tee patd Snbgobet bb ter soe pf ast 0 Hho Pears seek cuaeneene pyanodoort casos Ae vahna te eamern is ++ 04 werent wert ome ¢ “ ete '. a A pene Hah ree be ye sendrO SEOs RTANDL IT Bereto bovek rit Py Reeeety | eee hah er ampere nerereienhrsyh rere tt rn i 6 = te tala amet mee ye POP rap Ls doe ne rons pe anany te Wn eeTbetons = ek be nt td tage oh Ont re thor oh he ph hs bre BAL dir HO hh ateheb-ar ‘ - alte) fey Perey bee ; etek ee A el ae odd aie teehee ts bone jormaiere« Oe vor pein et nat ws - > 4 et sey rere ev naar . ree » . * apperter bak 3 nee ot -_ ah wa yisdreeeres 4 ‘ nd drtaa irda deers ttrnaqe tid a aging enya ba Ah meena! m4 bw dob rays ‘ apeeoney ; ao Mbhsh tienes Lgl aeee enter . rags pomened ae te seine Pirewerst ny yee pew ? 7 iyi ln bare oH 8 heTby ty err ager bemes 1 TP (OT or weahit . ret ier per aele hath Pee aebee te i ss bet pene ehn + Pe NS Sy ie” bree cede ervhese se aet Tre 5 - or On det oboe? ; rear we tH peering. he eae tape epteety hate tart tthe et a pence eee! Ga dergs bege tr he } ape tee og Pe ee gi b4 ole ae “ ’ 1994 Oe we , - » poner ms ” - . deter as bets tren ar eh ae eres tet obey--8 4 a Gabe 144 oho tebe oy me +e ee Ory eg ote whe + ade ee teen eres 4 0eke® Age EPR Pe aed He gel o owes vbw ome woe eee bebe hegt 0 ter dt Oh + ini * wer dete idacpetqnedaite 946 ofe Sb apy ihe Ne eho en tee ee vetua noteaty Be Metneenomegamerehd le les et onwen so hapa B68 nite ays met habs Mie 4 te Hin ne Te ee eee eeaemeyabied ames serehens inet: benprte Seer Yahowitert 1) 1Set on) genet 041 Aethpte hy tothe deal he o¥ aire = gery ree Cet Aaya PEERY Sait Mab ahs bmp jot pons ane ew dd ge na ae gegeae «4 hye pO ebads keene de gene! “ie eehe® enh rt wade Seay! 9 feet bea ahs 01 Jugs showwe ty “weee acon hath se tare tae? meet ‘ yes . rep btees tpbreny + nee eos * + heey bes eraey ‘ Ue hdd eather heer he y oT pa yeea gee gee eee “t : ‘ loon of a ey Oe the parse oot . evateyy wre yrs ae ee re ken pet ateae Ov natant byte de Oder pow a Ghd 04s Pde Osis ress > @ oh peae wor sy em hate Sh nee sobre wtwbets peo, te ; we) my bem gos © hete @ Ve ha egpeves tet hip be som t ot ate veneer Haine eee Ne — mereevert ra sary oe pane Pr p> pao Sens 0 & Rede anne tee fy eat ro ; weeor Pee | a wey tole er a nag oa ve Orhan top ten > . M o ’ ’ r M Lapeer te 4 A Qe@eal nr Miaegyt ope enemy one ake a parte tat hardin deekm pleads el te ite Sete Ufaccaatlacanstone te Pant ped tamy See iba cetet ate fatts nebsontoneteiaeetastpcaseeth r ial ye oe ye geeer P ‘ at pee Pits h sabe athe pandanalgaitosre ta py end sitonacg see re de ital te yao’ : SP hebesehetenetel wT aks beayabennt 1 peppbeeescer “phate sooo Tinton TTedibet her Mehr tinned tee ee: jannnee area torn huineas bots be OPS ie oe dtr pee fh tiem I . abode » ptwegat be te senda yep one sade & be habated - 7 i 8 NY ee he ae sa pe trey ag Bebe “eeents wiaae Ahn ah a na nigh gE Ra cle oa va baa onenty Wermeen ere? ter eatart tie sido ghhe Fx 10l aes hgh (he tonotey o ptake beeen eh Pe me eye aye Peale verrecete ene Tele ire. predates ! 9 ty ae . Choe : *e" rs Dik 4 wUfbel jostle mersaestasgtn nen. atti pete ciated shy ctelecatalels der here © thrbr wapsete d= Mary «dah de C ampe oren $09 boine hd 8146 lalate sin )9 ner pelaee 44 Plneed wpe pa rebar ops ah eee! orb Liv Lipa ee ere ee eee tH Rete tinetind : a er ae ode ee (rene fee eh aber NIT eet rene rey trertet revtete ere) SOUP hd dirfind part ote Aledo on ouele : bd 4 Na PePVebe bereeeererpr sures Ha da ot aon alerts one 4 * a pceepgey Aree item be Se 8! lgprneae enw pea mie~ ve oe e a dept go hebem , + ste ame seed bata vpn ot tguiajereha . ya nent Maa oaeanaten ra hana na 9 ra Y ohne pe mew ie eaeet be ope Redetonststsee , beer p open pee We aees Were Pere Te appre trad" 4 Md T eee baaly LER OP ; 4 vache pa ia oa pa he ha th Joe pededers poh echew eget serenade tar i re reed riots panncteee Lr ES Neen Dat TN lib bret anes one ethan dey 7 waa tahons haga mnie a tao ony par owe of = ee be pohedetine }weedee ty by’ abel om hatnte , oo worry my, nape Sree we pearergnnomevewn rare ttl tT ome a) romeenninyy > ep earnee aaa ing ed i o etre Ane ‘ A . ie oe peg ot + ahi ? 42 Pe ok) taped te bccsuenesesorer ? pacsherenaes | ug ta pops ed genes Re ie sale ots ~? “ep 4 poe Deters he. ++ Ag nt Geto’ Par te: ted op hedot aded SO 7 topo hea eghe ve sepa td be 94 be emhe tira she wm bobetete a ee te ; aps ploy waren he Lg pep t-rare ah 0 Oud ge (aend logy ne +4 or afe rere goad, owe iatebet tire qd ser ae Qoag a eae mb pny ? noe mbes odes phpie er ~~ ee ethene = RE bien febi te « lnpabe pe pe aeiety le ] a sa poe ~-* on Toe ol Ted od eaaeeae m ickite t- 4 owt area te hed tainyanne he ort : ; ay ee 4 2 gt hat Pemewrdn ss Lr tey siento! @ 4 Orde de otha be eed ot > ane e . yee bee beol weet yf rere gre vie tt) mee a, : libs “Yi te ae ores le 8 omni wh > ‘ papes ame yes eebyeere ree 4rF «yr whe po = . + oo % o ae Lee page avec yepe ry > oP ; Latch he py tebe hed He See po helsh pea ree pve we ahebene) 5} tedede beiegg ae Seept pig). go tein ae tele , 2 ] , 4 L do bergcinaie eet yest 84's esate peste bees ob bed goqtpnle Gu Se Mevte Pras popreriesioasper tenner eee Lk Liseeelobeteertyd $46 Le pie o4dehine bepeed ones bags Mepeng mets agus beter lat+ Oe oo oy pereependis ‘owe Petr orte ber Hehe ke! MMe raate tone cde eto Lar hed & Onna ya! ape yre s babede te ebanheee’ on Ce leap atneyletyoqere me pee a Ps hivesd see oaths . ra! pre hbabbobrnebebevert ht Tart fears (hebrertett +99) Epmedesore bry e wat 4 perth bed wy breed rs a ; squepede rs ep legpepegaten ypbel ber bemien- ett HV . og 0a ppedag tone A ae a - hn, Be pe be ogee beds . Whee Pole Meee Dothene tage he poe teeahe pe laren hese ° ie Od wehbe. gebott anawerens Serr’ ae tdds ayedydete te te beat Bye etae eynGy bres be Ht eter lew qh eye te ye eee uae oe h4 ewes wy ta, Behbh bend eknaied ‘ $4 dele +: cate [@degHae ph ph4 Th gars Sage ot Lege oe peeve tnere ne Oe nr) N a eet oe sheer teve’ se? ye beget ® wie beget tote hays ede qeldeds & bye aie : whe Dpunhen Gate 4 adgdawate WIE > + Viele yore » qyhtn? 6 tafe vapor had ade gh ghere she OPP spot tous one eee, ees me sa ne ve oe swerwl peta @lopeed 4 gobs shee lee © Dy oeri<é 9 nope fe peaet pm 4 bo vere ips et penn tober hs bole ae Year ete) ometlaeoe Calis cbr ister ce ped vcrt) wrae + pd j ire prt Jarte seve aibees in whee Ley Ad bagnde pate ote sey Vobpteh® 3656 re ~ the ” ip heatie ies Ley ree ‘On: “Tada bestesey ahr reer sees tee pee, or eigrate Hers be = ‘ 1oe er iets She theta bs ow keede tae pdr pint on an eta peer! tie Pee, OS dae eee i“ oye le mye ot ae mire ve De eee mt s rarig 20 bet : yr emnrrahes eyes es DOT, po hate erie tT eral. a yi hchwhee 4 We heve 9 cre a adpew oF " Aqivtrd- eu aay 3) ret jepure vide 9 pepete & bya her : e Lapse be pe wpe pegulerebs ip ieee wwixhe off dadets ou or yiwey ee mie Mo Oot og OE Pee heh peastpe ssacbear’ eet jarey 144 > wer 4 pote vlepeee inner bw be oped bgp da de eee bp nete ww” eet ee 64 jedugieret + pea peak 4 (00 °p Re bow soemacieee be bee Ego vor er ayn eld -seshaert Ave ye tote > ote ah ‘ ft Fhe i _ e Py ete erent fm at a eie)= her eet qh 16 29 ey Pann pore + be gta Ore one ots erp tenon Lo etew o) ett ede pupegen ede i+ ope be |eee apt reerene mre y: de ebeyearyed= bh etree 00% Whe eee gd tpte re rt ip oqOde wogedediegee relat fone see ote eel a pede 1) Bele ite qa ek e jalpege ome og im FR Segal owe Go pepe pe gheoet o (2 Dada wgehe tm: 5 ony ak ws MM 44 atsode sre & & oe pee . ' : heed J + tutte eerrerii ie oY Meese lad ‘ 4 rr" ay id Asp eniee joue™e ere Aregtenne ew iay, Jes Rr esuier iat «hedenas 4 pt Bade qeee [Oe be le Dad edt Cree woe fe weet dedece o¢ bebe tone tee gee eToys 1 eee ree «pot bene ab Foede eben jew + oe» « 4 4 got M4 ’ ’ M1 r4 berry dxpet gnereeete et ‘ geet ate? seehepe > aires o-td +1 r ohatdie gm bnl gtk gee ek meee Sums lege! pee pene -penes ye : Peay sot 2 4e sone ; “Tae re - ‘ paltey oor? sols 1anegqned qqemaeee sear ee t Dt depen) ere’ 29> } jo te Piped beret ine tr tng biped the Mie? #7 baw “« . ’ soy dno hey aeet spettorp tee boneg + be Hem emanate age ei oe dere o . 4" ‘ jo —n ; ‘ aoe —" 2) ochneede thet 064 bepehe te 16> nr : “ ; 9 . = >" oe are ‘~ rere 4 be Owe ba pede oe Ve 4 oa yeee OF A \ : nen avece ate —? Bis pe le petete te‘te b fe fe 4+ ovtriathy te@it © tm & ’ raring ter's paqreenerveg et hem Py type he pt fens ete Ae aie 8 ee ehh OF et EER - al ‘ poet pte oreors pte das. 4 -oht ebeue p 5 dae erat 4 Re th Boe fue pore et he ores ay bee? eerie share waste ee ved we nier oveg sear sh be ps bode cole Chir rem * tire yee “> = jpeg ets bet eteus pe id ant o pat BAe yp yh a hy 18: dem erdm inns ert é prom ba pies erie lesaronemers ee * 4 Srlegeee . <* ; PeeereT eer 4H eH GAPn ae | ge “6 eabet jaage Mpee meget ete eet pad na ve ewne TEER Ot po sanqeen eat Be Ore : is ad . be seegehegatraens pete eit pewde bt t4 Phy 4 }00) 0) 0 > ingle? pe © PPAR eet ee dyy 4 fe we ge fe OORT 14 ie ony bere hye ad z oa ° ” ; ee ty nt abeavaeenes + Me mm peak aed Hegee pga gt eePly LPT Pt iehw iene ot ane + “ . a lawite marble. “ ’ phe om on th bayades rose pris han Fs a payne 6 M4) wae bah + Tres: ever . ulate o berte ves enere wee 7 : = wel a’ sabe a + " poset f hbet eeted A no vate Reve at > "| ' on peek: bret . ae y4 ts hee et . ¢ pines fob pe ‘7 hi Sins peed sh » j “ whee my oppren te gts epererters bepemyelar pent ee Daleaquny mF eune signe )th9 i) heieg par’ ‘hive en " uadu obed'e + oh MOOT eG rhs prot be Lae hehe tesierde Fhe a bebe rp ge eth phpd'y FY 4 . : Rabcerh ri ne ah cpea+ Sash pels pata bn OOh00" bart br sededabeye phaser , geodata bog hede : Taste . eb aby teley ga qrite amet et 4 . ° : : : be . yonpdonade keds ot net ye bo Me Shas + v4 er eg er eo ae $a Rowe yere te Seren edt ee Wy lee ean eartee © r ea ay b, ' + br . 4 056-9 ee dets wo hthane ve i" tipo 4b © dale begnae onqed eet pore goqeyt tenes? a Ap é ¢ Lethe ed pyheneg (O70 44 tm te Dae teka yi Gee aeerge t ee ate Toby babe pweeasertode™ ips ehebetr Org 1404 6 — oo (the oe ieree — we he ws pet bbebL Og Cee hae nd erretrrerire ri retss ary +H | haa POOF 9 10 (4 4 oy Dye elegy ad payee vets 1p rehtew ts bi ola) tenaeeaet ot 8 904 pe peed wl 4s rd she dwkee idan sheer beter Sodio pegeen ne hee Mb ay ome Apayn To pera oe diye pyee 4 pivot Mango gr’ "> nopecant prfomyd lS 8, oe ae sti rae? ’ bye ts! perihe) " nige hog in pggued abil e ye quite i pe pe Lage nett it dy 4 og . ‘ . dar ram 904 Yer ey Et AAR eeadie jee pt Dem ee ve eagee “ 7 oy oe eh Oe ro ine ? wt ote mariewe reer, Eeerntrte ett ae be te ah Le rig eye ’ nN eee ave More © ee prnpedene dept) titedesy whe yea dae ture rein ps pri erode beds anew } ’ es 19 bated Ds , ' : myer age ets bi gtrthe ey oc Porat Pe rnaeernes ; : He bn Hh SF 4 ga eyet eetame Pee , asd \poge chile a eae * oie res vt ee Yaa sie henege te nee Meline ar os) siheihededl peepee err a bea Lala sagt 4 } f re [ican ba ae gd ge beady pny ay epabe gee El ap phy eiente tary Af merit pve geek peng ” Sy pane pedy PROESA rin je eR OER TIE bE I He pode 960 tre peapeeenrrar it) “ee ay ; bepes : sy pebsieen ope ale a aha og nana 4 . : 7 : 4 ; : “=o re er ae how ae yy at wet at} ante oe ; peed gs bere be te babes wm Meare Pew ge ty ter er el 6 apy tae i" y ae) é veer ee page +d hays geenlgs eee ae begat wei a youre * J t~ " ogee Th) Pe oe 1 oon eeendevete mae ebr ht ot pe Pe ~~ * vite bebe Lowe é ; re sty piee a: erm GREE DRG Tr bbe oa Hh hes oh BAD EAT egw © 0r a . be Ms ere s ode phere’ ; olerode eney ee ran : i r ahi to erdsy ‘ paas Todos ohelletsaieehveleL ab eeeh oh righ | ert reve hw } : ' + ene gee SY he A gm met ote Ae AO ba pr va et id oe eeet eae Vee 7 | ‘ : > ~" . YON e eae ages etn" 4) + eeteto ss stereo yee “~ I . ' fees rere ted ¢@ bite gers er plin Gand a. bt pe edaedat & yo eeee9 Oe peepee be hehe ore ‘ were 4190 ein eas arate outs iy re td heed ‘ . es . ’ v wet 3 ee peo ee hae UG 7 , ao ’ ° er + ' ten et eer ee ee ere™ *? ‘ . 4 ‘ os oe and , ¥ ve rw me he gh alt epee wend ice wesebe pare a eed ° ‘ ‘ pet F’ +4 ‘ . - bi Gieae 144 pee et ontm pang eet! FR Pr rr pe olsen Aue is ee - al 1 ' ‘ ‘ “e+ éomperiet sh od . Tete ° :" ; we cpr ‘ ’ — ’ ejspeeee deine poor, © 1e5 eae 4 yh jg band . ? en os - wayne . 4ipf bapees aietre eta hee Ca tot el ol eae atadueet joie * aps | ' ay 1 above fe ev dL rrndae yf tb Styrene dhe ys debe a @ Auawh une Fe a » gee ’ ae ea Pon Gages Prete . ha poten en rode of “irs oo Bree * Oe row 1 Eenet a pine . , jot s me rhe qeeerer ‘s VEO Prete or gt any 6 Ames pt Re ~ oe . wie ‘ ne garqentegri jer wees or 4d = oehe wont “ eriewe ws prorwty 4 , non pre As yege erred 44s fa) ape nee aaen dene ja e* LOO teF 20 ier br vet Sere ee > det e herr wr pre phew Ore , aad hh) ab hd bres evigt rete ta pe tt PAE AR we tcl sheeenebal- ha rinnt 4 Orvweni be kde ae? ‘ “a po tha firek oh ed be tani go og? TTT OR a dy oa wh ahias O44 #8 YENE OF Lee ye peat nV a a 4 erro ’ "7 pe ay be ber hed ’ yy yeerer Pee tel ha ey aa we uy errerieerry re Crome Cor i ‘ ' . * bd v4 “ Pe ee eee a We 4 end ew eety ‘ he g oy peporaas4f ’ > , bee ° , J OT Ll od Al beh phan Ra wer bales ase ave Pye wanes . “4 Boles ' Semreet< Atala Py ao sh | reeves cone een eked 1 ee erarrnae at pol ose ee eee bees ete , Tr. ie * ’ + + haus organ aege weer 4b be om at ch Cogn ot ol ode por igh eens Wa SE be wake ba pares heyed * Dengee C apranireunpsiaall Clael aot Peretti vee wae . we 4 * owe * ” nak a gle ee beter fetes mot! eeatet ’ ‘ tiater pe ae ' en) hed? ve i. oeave : we wee equator reid ; wath ‘ “joe " ’ * 6 ' ' ebaere® : oedye (ree 1 OF kate podotete shee te eet teers wr oe 8 a TE ek amie fio oF er * pp bias ma heh eee 7M sou meet M crore ele So beers & Are. 4 ; pagetes stone’ gigantea eee © ' ue a : bab 108s he MOORE Reyes CMO by gu ha eh gt Mrieg oer terete Inehawt bape wutes bbw ao) 4 Geo Me dah t | f Mea epg beg ees phy Lad re’ WT ot ee to! soto ’ ee Bday 9 Ons Ooh, © beta voy nee Vedat oe we te acer hd een gh ian Saye ae Pe Tene pr phage ehrhy os <9 + aN Mo | . bean . ‘ "+ ’ rowre re 1 bree " eee geaed ct tatere ee ? es er the d O88 a6 ane Or i +* pe beb ph he aaah ~ ~ at J vw} perth! 4 i : Tee ees ate wapribenvi (gg ees hoBats dam thet ad er tae ad an s 7 oe pi ghee be eT iTge He ot SO Ne 0g 1 & ar 4 pernit ee? Ble hen pte) nelle tre © bse~ ory * tavbaier® ROO Ah ame WENT Hy SEG! bie lpwly 10 pe perlite wAse a Cubs Be tvike (iFrind Oe errr rr ud e wete au ek Ss ed he ind ‘ pedear aed eran el ree or eee aitermand petite aS pie A ae WF RRO R Op araequae Ph § OUTTr speed Jae leed. be hale see ema hee rer Crees. see a sprays eo geen asgsee pede gO) eto er & te hudeter ee & are Bees geneween dy & & & Gy: Pre a gh ah Nem acaene . Cs oa Ow Yas Yet tae ak Oe Dine Bi te ee ee ee PO - ay? ™ a yA Oe Wha” i@ } AS 7 od fn ‘! ta 4 wt Pr | Qe si te, pitta JI. 2S - sf A 4 ~ Sy | \ Nb@ekt ar) Peek Vet ee prrtedades y, eetobey tir Ney dy} wa st Phe Ae : erste apres = ". < wy. \ bn 4 rs 3 vw wer wey a ea F - E udp e\. AL] ]Y ’ “ss * fai gg tetas er *9 ™ Wew wi as Eee aie on +@ Siaictus Re ‘- yer) iJ oy seeas oP adliand) 4 ae a bd >, gr Igy Oy. t wyye TIT Ty 9 oy waved all we > Bs Pea erre upseuyy gnereey bt YS “ “. eh ee ad We araithenedy ot yA 1) we 4 Taner « * 1 hic; XX 4 A a4 y 1 by wih al ! P| te dns gedsis “fe : Mn : : heed Map gem tnrr tee PPA LP ig PPA naa up dAsre }- Bs | Tit eu pase Pol iti ‘-{ pA . ui a" ~ vty 18a gat Wee ae” it vn . fs Pee iy F TM el She oo. oe QLeer Detetarerattetarnd LL : eer, ye | a see ” = yi | a , wa Nee wie 7°. TT Uae us 44° EYEE LAK TD aa , “ob 4 & 4, » te te? Sooty , a) Naan o8 at eas) Wai tanevestiinents i yecee ; > a = Ni y Nps . s ! Bp : A . PEE | ha. 444 yee aay Af A ae, y: Vy? or A, mw A ee oy, 3 hee Bae Riga ey v. ehh ™,’.’ Na 1,44 at » WARARAA DL eA yi ; ew ea PG A“ 4 £45 4 yityy 3. ae DAA, -,9. wn ah . . ae, in) Vee . | ad | are 406 see v4 a9 + . bd PRAFA, wee te oe Saceee he =. Kol!) Leer eos Wetkn f vam ty ve! wey 1 I my os hy. ee | (refi | Ti cee rn A e¢ OW, Tit Piano a pede vg aes 4¢* prey, | PLT LETTE RAL onde y 9, qf | rh | ret ddd TTT | oe RL Ayers Ae ieaemy miiliyt > adn Wai 4 a ” et on wee : 2 ayiciwence | iene \ 4} oh v Sy ad ey d 8G & tp itn oy . tae, ) iy Uy Vy Yr eon ma tena, stl ety 1 ‘piy ‘he need mebib re a aus wer oo » Ff 5 oe SS asl RMS AA TL ress Ss } : Vy iy, MTT] | ‘ es (cay eee" ape 77 At Wan ond, 44 ay, vis r ie Arratith Beene aie: pe) TIAL et RAR AG OWA big EVLA are Ny Nerve yal ae ant ren iy wx wil muNe it tty Bo wy ayaa hy Ne Vee eo rine en lk eal TT shea Sn ccoene wate Rp jPod ¢ pop in Vy? ef pw } ) Se P ) er A ~ Nt } Wty ae aad ert. Ne KAP i yo 2 34g q ys ~)J rs Hy, a. Nn ~ iy Py a4 s\n? Wy y > - "Wy a ‘ ibe aD 9 SSO hh ete vedere aay TNs, Page RAN eee hee? bid vie Mi safe | Nantes | py etal baie ay Dinca’ Wty Aw ow file, ween ia i, BER fag ae | ( \ : é : a aA © “ BS y Yhys PPLE | Terenas Why a Ghent | sa ea Poy "Ve! Pert lotre Mee, 4 e ao ‘.Ae Py | 4 on fa = r i A wee a: wo, + ate «3 OSS ae ~ Be Raa b SAB Rp sa BSE a 0 Be ‘4 —— ‘ty Gey Ee, ’ ~ 6 . os es. oe Nb, ? FtGe f . TURTLES ~ ee a+ be. 2 eR 4 welts be ee a ea oo Tie , ESL -& ioe ~~. Swe kd -' / ¥ 5 ” tf! | y | 4 as | a » ‘ | F ane x diac, ee al FPR AEP bop af pe iP fe | | gl scgnaede E ihe. a as +iayged aif voe ng lS a 4 line re i oF | eas! +” LUI unt hauil dnl LL ahdetadl renee AS SRST RU ANS uae NTE nat senate , haba Maisie || thee iw) A in oeoas bard 44 ghe, HNN baht a ry f Seeivernen atic CPT RST livesiiell +844, Tey itr fe Suen Re MAL LAL ‘He | Tet! Aa Verda DARI Sain 86 3 * eo See oe ee oh 2 OMe cet saad sp? barter MSLa dhe eaeee? AAR y acre wee | TTT N00 esst8 oui. ane . Pwhbag’ eee ri a aadadad EEE AN qari UTE A : PO MEY Ys. TL ttn aetabeen LE EEE vanes ye {ih cc ittnt a ny PTT Nat TH EE Ss ‘ “Peers. es af oo | | Wher vrrnativeesae ner yt v'H, | Peles 4 Aah Ae yhusercuces: | jee ee a WTP Sa aS VW ‘a! ant 4 Wh on ‘ i ye’ | + ¥ be! Piorer shogsannee a a Agaye PN aoa tat ed De wil» iagttoet ape fA Ab “ ie, WW Ulyata a Ol ge Bs pl be PP PEET i pads, andl Wt Seve ; "2 a. ‘ae Veo tint i Seeulceatt cee ae ag Po nee qf HTH — —— 2 a A ———— ana 0S CARDED 19a cs” 1. IV.--Notes on Some Rare and Interesting Marine Crustacea. 22nd Ann. Rpt. Fish. Bd. Scotland, Pt. 5, 1904, pp. 242- 261, pls. XIII-XV.. | 2. VII.-~On Some Parasites of Fishes new to the Scottish Marine Fauna. 22nd Ann. Rpt. Fish. Bd. Scotland, Pt. 3, 1904, pp. 275- 280, pl. XVII. 3. Il1I.--Observations on some parasites of fishes new or rare in Scottish waters. 23a Ann. Rpt. Fish. Bd. Scotland, 1905, pp. 108-119, pls. V, VI. 4. ViI.-~On some new and rare Crustacea from the Scottish Seas. 25d Ann. Rpt. Fish. Bd. Scotland, 1904, pt. 3, (1905), pp. 141-153, pls. XXIII. 5. II.--Observations on the Otoliths of some Teleostean Fishes. 24th Ann. Rpt. Fish. Bd. Scotland, Pt. 3, 1905 (1906), pp. 48-82, pls. I-V. 6. IX.--Notes on new and rare Copepoda from the Scottish Seas. 24th Ann. Rpt. Fish. Bd. Scotland, Pt. 3, 1905 (1906), pp. 275-280, pl. XIV. 7. III.--Some Additional Notes on Copepoda from the Scottish Seas. 25th Ann. Rpt. Fish. Bd. Scotland, 1906 (1908), pp. 209- 220, pls. XIII-XV. 8. VI.--Some Observations on the Food of the Herring. 25th Ann. Rpt. Fish. Bd. Scotland, 1906 (1908) ys Moe 9. III.--Some Notes on Fish Parasites. ’ 26th Ann. Rpt. Fish. Bd. Scotland, Pt. 3, 1909, pp. 73- 92, pls. III-VII. 10. Il1I.--Notes on the Distribution of Pelagic Crustacea in Lower and Upper Loch Fyne. 27th Ann. Rpt. Fish. Bd. Scotland, 1910, pp. 74-99. ll. IV.--On the Food of the Halibut, with notes on the food of Scorpaena, Phycis Blennoides, thé Garpike and Dhimaera Monstrosa. 28th Ann. Rpt. Fish. Bd. Scotland, 1911, pp. 24=37. 12. VII.--Notes on some Treematode Parasites of Fishes. 28th Ann. Rpt. Fish. Bd. Scotland, 1911. pp. 68-71 pls. VII-VIItI. , Wh: iy (over) ANNUAL REPORT OF THE FISHERY BOARD. SCOTLAND. 1904 ~ 1912 CRUSTACEA, ETC. VOL. 3. T.Sscorr. [Reprinted from Tuenty-second Annual Report of the Fishery Board for Scotland, Part III., published August 29, 1904. | IV.—_NOTES ON SOME RARE AND INTERESTING MARINE CRUSTACEA. By Tuomas Scott, LL.D., F.L.S. (Plates XIJI.-XV ) CONTENTS. PAGE Preliminary Remarks, : : : : : : : . 242 Copepoda :— Fam. Monstrillide, . : : : : : : . 243 Fam. -Choniostomatide, . é : , : ‘ . 250 Amphipoda, ; . ‘ : : ‘ : : : oo 2a Sympoda, . : : 4 : : : ; va 208 Description of the Plates, ; . : : , ; ; “) 259 PRELIMINARY REMARKS, In the foilowing notes I have described a number of minute Crustaceans belonging to the Monstrillide and the Choniostomatide—two families of Copepoda containing aberrant and parasitic forms of more than usual interest. A few forms belonging to other groups more or less rare in the Scottish seas are also recorded here. The species recorded here belonging to the EWioketrillides are as follows :— Monstrilla grandis, Giesbrecht. x longicornis, 1. ©. Thompson. “ gracilicauda, Giesbrecht., se anglica, Lubbock. il dubia, T. Scott, sp. n. Thaumaleus thompsoni, Giesbrecht. As rigidus (I. C. Thompson). 35 zetlandicus, T. Scott, sp. n. us rostratus, 'T. Scott, sp. n. The following are the names of the seven species belonging to the Choniostomatidz which are also described :— Stenothocheres egregius, Hansen, new to British Fauna. Spheronella paradoxa, Hansen, ,, a a * minuta, T. Scott, sp. n. 95 callisome, T. Scott, sp. n. = cluthe, T. Scott, sp. n. Ms pygmea, T, Scott, sp. n. ‘f amphilocht, Hansen, A description is furnished of each of the species mentioned above, and - this is illustrated by drawings which have been prepared by my son, Mr. A. Scott, A.L.S., who also prepared most of the dissections required. The preparing of these dissections wasin some cases rendered more difficult when the species happened to be represented by only a single 243 Part [[I—Twenty-second Annual Report specimen whose appendages were not very obvious even with a moderately high magnification. Some moderately rare species of Amphipoda and Sympoda are recorded at the end of the paper, the names of which are as follows :— Hyperia medusarum (O. F. Muller). Tryphana malmi, Boeck. Anonyx nugax (Phipps). Hoplonyx cicada (Fabr.). Harpinia pectinata, G. O. Sars. Metopa borealis, G. O. Sars. Paratylus falcatus (Metzger). Megaluropus agilis, Norman Idothea neglecta, G. O. Sars. Eudorellopsis deformis, Kryoer. Pseudocuma stimilis, G. O. Sars. The following are the descriptions of the various species referred to :— COPEPODA. Fam. MONSTRILLIDE Genus Monstrilla, Dana, 1848. Monstrilla grandis, Giesbrecht. PI, xiii, fig. 11, 12; pl. xiv., fig. 9-11; ply. ae. 2: 1892. Monstrilla grandis, Giesb., Pelag. Copep. des Golfes v. Neapel, p. 588, pl. 46, fig. 2, 8, 11, 17, 19, 24, 25, 35,-39. Description of the Female:—In this species the antennules of the female, which are moderately stout, are scarcely equal to one-fourth the length of the animal; their structure is somewhat similar to that of the antennules of WZ. gracilicauda, but the articulations are rather more distinct (fig. 9, pl. xiv.). The fifth pair of thoracic feet are sub-cylindrical, about twice as long as broad, and with a somewhat bi-lobed extremity (fig. 10, pl. xiv.) ; the exterior lobe bears three sete, the inner one is small but the other two are elongated. The inner lobe appears to be furnished with only a single apical seta, but our dissection shows what appears to be the base of a seta on the inner margin of this lobe, the seta itself having probably been broken off; the position of this seta is indicated on the drawing by dotted lines. The abdomen consists of three segments, but the first, which is larger than the next two combined, is divided into two portions by a pseudo- articulation as shown by the drawing (fig. 11, pl. xiii., and fig. 11, pl. xiv.) ; the second and third segments are sub-equal and are together much smaller than the first segment. The furcal joints are each provided with six sete, one being situated on the outer edge near the base of the joint while the others spring from the apex (fig. 11, pl. xiv.); one of the apical sete near the inner edge is very small. The female represented by the drawing (fig. 11, pl. xiii.) measures 4°25 mm. (about + of an inch). Description of the Male :—The male is much smaller than the female ; the specimen represented by the drawing (fig. 12, pl. xiii.) measures only 2 mm. (2 of an inch). of the Fishery Board for Scotland. 244, The antennules of the male, which are proportionally rather longer than those of the female, are five- jointed, the last joint being hinged to the preceding one (fig. 1, pli xv.) The first and second segments of the male abdomen are not coalescent as in the female, but otherwise the two sexes are nearly alike. The armature of the furcal joints (fig. 2, pl. xv.) is similar to that of the female. The fifth pair of feet resemble very closely the fifth pair of the male of M. longtremis. Habitat—Head of Loch Fyne (Firth of Clyde), November 28, 1899, one female, and January 30, 1901, a male and a female. Professor G. S. Brady records a Monstrilla, obtained at Cullercoats in July, 1900, which he thinks may be the male of WM. grandis, Giesbrecht,* and I. C. Thompson mentions the occurrence of the same species in the vicinity of the Channel Islands.t Monstrilla longicornis, I. C. Thompson, PI. xiii., fig. 1-7. 1890. dMonstrilla longicornis, 1.C. Thompson, Trans. L’pool. Biol. Soc., vol. iv., p. 119, pl. iv., figs. 1, 2, and 4 (6). 1892. Monstrilla longirenis, Giesb., Pelagischen Copepoden des Golfes von Neapel, p. 589, pl. 46, figs. 10, 14, 22, 37, and £1): 1962. i pe ote longiremis, T. Scott, 20th Rept. Fishery Board for Scotland, pt. iii., p. 469, pl. xxv., figs. 3 and 4 (@). The antennules in both the female and male are elongated and slender, being in some examples nearly half as long as the cephalothorax and abdomen combined ; but their length seems to vary to some extent in different individuals, and those of the male appear to be proportionally rather longer than in the female. The male antennules are composed of six joints, and the articulation between the fifth and sixth is so hinged that the sixth joint can be folded inwards ; the second and last joints are of nearly equal length and considerably longer than any of the others (fig. 6). In the female antennules all the joints except the first appear to be coalescent, so that each antennule is apparently only two-jointed fig. 3). The fifth thoracic feet of the female consist each of a sub-cylindrical plate, but the proximal half of the leg is rather wider than the lower half and is defined from it by a distinct notch on the inner margin, and from this notch there springs a moderately long seta; three other sete spring from the distal extremity of the leg, but the innermost one is short while the other two are elongated ; all the setee appear to be more or less plumose fig, 4), The fifth feet of the male are somewhat rudimentary, each being represented by a single moderately long plumose seta which springs from a small tubercle near the lower ventral margin of the last thoracic seg- ment. The genital appendages are narrow and spiniform (fig. 7), The furcal joints in the female are each furnished with five moderately long setze, but there are only four sete to each of the furcal joints in the male. ‘This appears to be the only British species of Monstrilla in which the number of furcal setz in the female is five. The male of Monstrilla longicornis does not appear to have been previously recorded except by I. C. Thompson. * Nat. Hist. Trans. Northumb., Durham, and Newcastle, vol. xiv., p. 64, pl. iv., fig. 1-3. + Journ, Marine Zool. and Microscopy, vol. ii., p. 97 (No. 8, December, 1897). 245 Part IIT.—Twenty-second Annual Report The following are the localities whence I have obtained this species and the dates when the different specimens were collected :— Firth of Forth, between Fidra and the Bass Rock, October 18, 1890 (9). Firth of Forth, east of Inchkeith, August 14, 1891 (Q & 2). Firth of Forth (locality not stated), 1893 (Q & 3). Firth of Forth, Station V. (to the west of May Island), August 30, 1894 (29 & 2). Firth of Forth, Station V., July 24, 1901 (@). Firth of Tay, at Buddon, December 5, 1902 (9). Thirty-five miles east of May Island (per ss. ‘“Glenogle,’ of Aberdeen), August 20, 1903 (2 & 2). Off Aberdeen about ten miles, November 11, 1901 (9). Firth of Clyde, off the Ayrshire coast, November (date not stated), 1895 (Q). Firth of Clyde, head of Loch Fyne, December 11, 1897 (@). Firth of Clyde, Whitefarland Bay, Arran, July 6, 1899 (¢). Solway Firth, Luce Bay (per Andrew Scott), November 26, 1901 (9). Larne Harbour, Ireland (per Andrew Scott), January 14, 1904. The female represented by the drawing (fig. 1) measured 3:1 mm., which is similar to the size given by Dr. Giesbrecht ; the length of the male which the drawing represents (fig. 2) is 2 mm. One or two of the more obvious characters by which &. longicornis may be distinguished from other forms are the long and somewhat slender antennules, the form and armature of the fifth pair of thoracic feet, and the number of the furcal sete. ‘The structure of the abdomen appears also to differ to some extent from the other species of Monstrilla recorded kere. It may be remarked further that the integument in this Species when examined with the microscope and under a moderately high power is seen to have a granular appearance not observed in other species (see the drawings, figs.1 and 2). That J. C. Thompson’s Monstiilla longicornis is identical with MM. longiremis, Giesbrecht, must, I think, be admitted. The long antennules, the granular appearance of the integument, the number of furcal sete, and the structure of the abdomen show that it can be nothing else, and as Thompson’s name was published two years before that of Dr. Giesbrecht it must be restored. Thompson does not appear to have seen the female or Dr. Giesbrecht the male of this species. Monstrilla gractlicauda, Giesbrecht. PI. xiii., fig. 8-10; pl. xiv., fig. 15. 1892. Monstrilla gracilicauda, Giesb., op. cit., p. 587, pl. 46, figs. 9, 16, 18, 29, 32, 43. In the female of Monstrilla gracilicauda the antennules are rather shorter than in the species just described. They appear to be four- jointed, the first three being small, while the end joint is equal to the eutire length of the other three (fig. 8, pl. xiii.). The fifth pair of thoracic feet (fig. 15, pl. xiv.) are sub-quadrate in out- line, rather longer than broad, and somewhat gibbous at the distal end as shown in the drawing; each foot is furnished with three plumose seta, one on the outer aspect and two at the apex, the feathering is very delicate and can only be seen by using a moderately high magnification. The abdomen consists of four segments, the first segment, which of the Fishery Board for Scotland. 24.6 appears to consist of two coalescent segments, is of a sub-cylindrical form but tapers slightly towards the distal extremity ; it is about one-third longer than the breadth at the widest part and nearly twice the entire length of the next segments. The third segment is only about half the length of the second one. ; The furcal joints are each provided with six sete arranged as shown in the drawing (fig. 10, pl. xiii.), but one of the sete is very small. The length of the specimen represented by the drawing is 3°l mm., which is somewhat larger than that stated by Dr. Giesbrecht. No males of this species have been observed hitherto. M. gracilicauda has been collected at the following places :— Firth of Forth, above Queensferry, June 26, 1890 (9). Firth of Forth, off Musselburgh, September 29, 1892 (9). *35 miles east of May Island, Firth of Forth (pers.s. “ Glenogle ”), August 20, 1903 (9). Firth of Clyde, Whitefarland Bay, Arran, July 6, 1899 (9). Firth of Clyde, near head of Loch Fyne, November 28, 1899 (@). Monstrilla anglica, Lubbock. PI. xii, fig. 13; pl. xiv., fig. 12 14. 1857. Monstrilla anglica, Lubbock. Ann, and Mag. Nat, Hist. (2) cvol. 2x, 409; pl: x2, fig. 7.8. 1900. Monstrilla (?) dane, Scott, 18th Ann. Rept. Fisher Board for Scotland, pt. i1., p. 398, pl. xiii., fig. 15-20. Description of the Female.—The specimen represented by the drawing measures 3°2 mm. (nearly § of an inch); it has a general resemblance in size and structure to Monstrilla longicornis, but is scarcely so rebust (fig. 13, pl.’ xiii.). The antennules are elongated and slender and indistinctly three-jointed ; the basal joint is as usual very short; the next, which is not very clearly defined, is also small, but longer than the basal joint; the remaining portion consists of a single piece which may be made up of two or three coalescent joints (fig. 12, pl. xiv.). The fifth pair of thoracic feet are sub-cylindrical in outline, and nearly twice as long as broad; each foot is furnished with two elongated apical sete, and the inner margin, which is nearly straight and shorter than the outer margin, terminates in a small rounded process, beyond which the distal portion of the foot becomes narrower as shown in the drawing (fig. 13, pl. xiv.). The genital filaments are scarcely equal in length to the furcal sete. The abdomen appears to consist of three segments; the first segment is about twice the length of the second, while the second is about one and a half times the length of the third. The furcal joints are each furnished with six sete (fig. 14, pl. xiv.). Habitat.—Firth of Forth, west of May Island, July 26, 1901; thirty- five miles east of May Island, August 20, 1903, per ss. “ Glenogle.” Females only were observed in both gatherings. This species resembles MV. longicornis in size, in the elongate antennules, and to some extent in the structure of the abdomen, but differs very distinctly in the armature of the fifth pair of thoracic feet, and in possessing six instead of five furcal sete; and the integument appears to want the minutely granulated structure observed in M. longicornis. The specimens recorded by me in Part III. of the Eighteenth Annual Report of the Fishery Board for Scotland from the Firth of Clyde appear to belong to Lubbock’s Monstrilla anglica; these specimens were * This specimen was of a fine green colour. 247 Part [11.—Twenty-second Annual Report apparently imperfect as regards the furcal hairs, and no doubt helped to disguise their relationship with the species named. Having now obtained specimens in fairly good coudition, [am enabled to give a few accurate figures of the female which may be of interest as supplementing Dr. Bourne’s very fine drawings of the male. (See the Quarterly Journ. of Micros. Science, vol. xxx., pt. 4, new series, Feb. 1890.) Monstrilla dubia, T. Scott, sp.n. Pl. xiii, fig. 14; pl. xiv., fig. 16-18. Description of the Female.—Body moderately slender ; length of the specimen represented by the drawing is 3°3 mm. (fully % of an inch). The cephalothoracic segment is about one and a half times the entire length of the remaining thoracic segments and abdomen. The abdomen is composed of three segments ; the first segment is about equal in size to the last segment of the thorax, the second is smaller than the next, while the second and third are together scarcely as long as the first segment (fig. 14, pl. xiv.). The antennules are moderately stout and about half as long as the cephalothoracic segment, and composed of four joints ; the first and third joints are small, the second is about half as long again as the third, while the fourth is equal to the entire length of the three joints (fig, 16, pl. xiv.) The fifth pair of thoracic feet are moderately slender; each foot is narrow and sub-cylindrical at the proximal end, but becomes wider distally and terminates in two lobes; thé outer lobe is larger than the inner and is furnished with three moderately long sete, the inner lobe is narrow and appears to be devoid of setz as shown in the drawing (fig. AT, apl, ty. The furcal joints are each provided with four elongated hairs, one of them springs from near the base of the outer margin, two spring from the apex, while the fourth is attached on the inner aspect and near the middle of the joint, as seen in the drawing (fig. 18, pl. xiv.). Habitat.—Firth of Forth, east of Inchkeith, August 14, 1891; and head of Lech Fyne (firth of Clyde), November 11, 1897, and November 28, 1899. No males have been observed. Remarks.—The Copepod of which I have just given a description does not agree with any described species known to me. The characters by which it may be distinguished are the following three: first, the structure of the abdomen, the first segment of which is as large as the segment of the thorax next to it; second, the peculiar form of the fifth pair of thoracic feet; and, third, the number and arrangement of the furcal sete. Monstrilla, dubia as described and figured here has a somewhat close resemblance to the female of MZ. dane as represented by the beautiful drawings of Professor Claparéde,* and especially by figure 3, taf. xvi., which shows the female from the under side; the proportional lencths of the abdominal and of the posterior thoracic segments are almost identical, but the furcal joints are represented with only three sete ; there is also a slight difference in the length of the second joint of the antennules, Had a separate drawing of the fifth pair of thoracic feet of the female been given by that author the identification of the species would have been rendered :xore certain. : * Beobachtungen uber Anatomie und Entwicklungsgeschichte wirbelloser thier an der kuste von Normandie, Angestellt, p. 95, taf. xvi., fig. 1-6 (1863). of the Fishery Board for Scotland. 248 Genus ThaumaleusKyroyer, 1849. Thaumaleus thomson, Giesb. Pl. xiv., fig. 1-4. 1892. Thaumaleus thomsoni, Giesb., Pelag. Copep. des Golfes v. Neapel, p. 584, pl. 46, fig. 7, 27, 31, 36, 40. 1902. Thaumaleus thompsoni, Scott, 20th Ann. Rept. Fishery Board for Scotland, pt. ili., p. 470, pl. xxv., fig. 5, 6. In Part III. of the Twentieth Annual Report of the Fishery Board for Scotland, I published a description with figures of the male of Thaumaleus thompsoni taken in Lerwick Harbour, Shetland. Recently, when examining a small collection of Monstrillas that had been captured from time to time during the past twelve or fifteen years, I found a single female of the same species that had been taken in a tow-net sample collected off Scarborough on July 9, 1893, during some investigations on behalf of the Fishery Board for Scotland; this specimen I will now briefly describe, and illustrate the description with figures showing a few of its more characteristic features. The specimen referred to was elongated and very slender, and measured 4°38 mm. in length (about + of an inch). The cephalothoracic segment was about equal to twice the entire length of the remaining segments of the thorax and abdomen combined (fig. 1, pl. xiv.). The antennules are short and stout, and appear to consist of four joints; but the third, which is small, seems to be partly coalescent with the second (fig. 2, pl. xiv.). The fifth pair of thoracic feet are moderately large, foliaceous, and are abruptly wider at the distal extremity, the result of a lobe-like process on the inner distal aspect; each foot carries three apical sete, the innermost of which is considerably shorter than the other two, as shown in the drawing (fig. 3, pl. xiv.). The abdomen consists of two segments ; the first is fully half as long as the last segment of the thorax, and larger and more dilated than the second segment. The short furcal joints carry three moderately elongated sete (tig. 4, pl. xiv.). The structure of the fifth pair of thoracic feet, and the form of the abdomen referred to above, seem to be characteristic of this species. Thaumaleus rigidus (I.C. Thompson). Pl. xiii., fig. 15-17; pl. xiv, fig. 19. 1888. Cymbasoma rigida, 1. C. Thompson. Linn. Soc. Journ. Zool., vol. xx., p. 154, pl. xii, fig, 1-4. 1890. Monstrilla rigida, Bourne. Quart. Journ. Micros. Science, VOlieuxx, Dik Zxxvily tion Sob ED. 1892. Thaumaleus claparédii, Giesb., op. cit., pp. 381-385, taf. 46, fig. 5, 15, 21, 26. Description of the Female.-—Length of the specimen represented by the drawing (fig. 15, pl. xiii.), 2°7 mm. (4 of an inch). The cephalothorax: is moderately stout, rather wider near the anterior end, and nearly twice as long as the entire length of the remaining segments. The abdomen is composed of two segments, the first is about one and a half times the length of the last segment of the thorax, and the proximal half is more or less dilated ; the second segment, which is smaller than the first, is probably composed of two coalescent segments, as a slight constriction, dividing the segment into two portions as shown by the drawing (fig. 15, pl. xiii., and fig. 19, pl. xiv.), is observable in all the specimens examined. The antennules are short and stout and appear to be four-jointed, the first and third joints being very small (fig. 16, pl. xiii.). 249 Part I[I.—Twenty-second Annual Report The fifth pair of thoracic feet are rather longer than broad, the terminal portion being distinctly small and wider than the proximal half; each foot carries three moderately long apical sete, as shown in the drawing (Gc. 1%, plexus. ). The fureal joints, which are of moderate length, are each furnished with three sete (fig. 19, pl. xiv.). Habitat.—Mauchrie Bay, Arran, Firth of Clyde, September 17, 1886. St. Andrews Bay, August 7, and off St. Monans, Firth of Forth, September 6, 1890. Dornoch Firth (Moray Firth district), July 30, 1895. Whitefarland Bay, Arran, Firth of Clyde, July 6, and between Arran and the Ayrshire coast, November 9, 1899. All the specimens obtained were females, ame for this form in preference to that of Dr. Giesbrecht, as I am convinced, after examining a number of individuals and comparing them with the descriptions and figures of Thompson and Bourne, that Thawmaleus rigidus (I. C. Thompson) and 7’. claparédii are identical. The antennules of the female in both are short and stout, and although Thompson’s figure indicates a greater number of articulations than is observed in 7’. claparédit, this may be due perhaps to certain constrictions having been mistaken for joints ; but what I rely on chiefly is the structure of the abdomen and the form and armature of the fifth pair of thoracic legs of the female, which, so far as they are represented by both Thompson’s and Bourne’s figures, are practically the same as the similar parts of 7. claparédi represented by the drawings of Dr. Giesbrecht. Thaumaleus zetlandicus, T. Scott, sp.n Pl. xiii, fig. 18, 19; pl. xiv., fig. 20-22; pl. xv., fig. 3, 4. Description of the Female.—Body moderately stout and elongated ; length of the specimen represented by the drawing (fig. 18, pl. ii.), 4°8 mm. (nearly 2 3 0f an inch). The cephalothoracic sesment is about one and a half times the entire length of the remaining segments of the thorax and abdomen. The abdomen is composed of three segments; the first segment is distinctly larger than the last segment of the thorax and about twice the entire length of the next two abdominal segments ; these two segments are sub-equal, but the second is slightly the longer of the two (fig. 22, pl. xiv.). The antennules, which are short and moderately stout, are composed of four joints; the first and third joints are smaller than the others, while the end joint is about equal to the entire length of the other three (fig. 20, pl. xiv.). The fifth pair of thoracic feet are short and broadly foliaceous and terminate in two broad rounded sub-equal lobes, the outer one of which is provided with three moderately long sete; the inner lobes do not appear to carry any setz (fig. 21, pl. xiv.). A male belonging apparently to the same species as the female “described above is considerably smaller than it, and the cephalothoracic segment is only slightly longer than the combined lengths of the other thoracic segments (fig. 19, pl. xiii.). The length of this male, which is represented by the drawing just referred to, is 26 mm. (or nearly +, of an inch). The antennules are five-jointed and longer than those of the female (fig. 3, pl. xv.); the abdomen appears to consist of four segments, the first two are sub-equal and are each distinctly smaller than the last segment of the thorax, while the last two are together only a little longer than the preceding segment. The number of furcal hairs is the same as in the female (fig. 2, pl. xv.). Habitat.—Lerwick Harbour, Shetland, October 15, 1901. of the Fishery Board for Scotland. — 250 Remarks,—The more obvious characters by which this species may be distinguished are: the structure and lengths of the female antennules, the three-segmented abdomen, together with the proportional difference in the size of the first segment with the preceding segment of the thorax and the other two abdominal segments ; and lastly, the peculiar form of the fifth pair of thoracic feet, as indicated by the various figures. Thaumaleus rostratus, T. Scott, sp. u. Pl. xiv., fig. 5-8. Description of the Female.-—The length of the specimen represented by the drawing (fig. 5) is 39 mm. (about 5% of an inch); the first cephalothoracic segment is moderately stout, tapering gradually in front into a blunt pointed rostrum; while posteriorly the body becomes gradually narrower towards the distal extremity (fig. 5, pl. xiv.). _ The abdomen is composed of three segments; the first segment is as large as the next two together, but the second is very small. Each of the furcal joints is provided with three sete of moderate lengths, arranged as shown in the drawing (fig. 8, pl. xiv.). Antennules short and moderately stout, four-jointed and sparingly setiferous; the first and third joints are small, the second is about one and a half times the leneth of the third, while the last is equal to the entire length of the other three joints (fig. 6, pl. xiv.). The fifth pair of thoracic feet are short and fcliaceous, and each terminates in two unequal lobes; the outer lobe, which is narrower than the inner and projects somewhat beyond it, is furnished with three moderately long sete; the inner lobe is broadly rounded and provided with a single seta (fig. 7, pl. xiv.). Habitat.—Lerwick Harbour, Shetland, October 15,1901. Three or four specimens were obtained, all of which were females. Remarks.—The form just described is readily distinguished by the produced forehead and by the form and armature of the fifth pair of thoracic feet. Fam. CHONIOSTOMATID#, Hansen (1887). Genus Stenothocheres, Hansen (1897). Stenothocheres egregius, H. J. Hansen. Pl. xv., fig. 5-10. 1897. Stenothocheres egregius, Hansen, The Choniostomatide, p- 89, pl. i. fig. 1 a-e. The Sphceronella-like form which I ascribe to Stenothocheres egregius was obtained in the marsupium of Metopa borealis, G. O. Sars. The female oe by the drawing (fig. 5) measured about °68 mm. in length (nearly 4, of an inch) ; the body was almost spherical in shape, but was rather longer than the height. The antennules are small (fig. 7), and the end joint, which is furnished with two moderately long spine-like terminal sete, is about one and a half times as long as the preceding one. The antennee are very minute and composed of two sub-equal joints, and they are each armed with a comparatively stout terminal spine (fig. 8). The maxillipeds were damaged while being removed for the purpose of mounting, but the second pair, so far as they could be made out, appear to be moderately strong with stout terminal claws as indicated in figure 6. The first pair of feet, though very small, are comparatively stout and two-branched, and both branches appear to be two-jointed ; the inner branches are furnished with three apical spines, the middle one being 251 Part [1[.—Twenty-second Annual Report moderately elongated, while the other two are short; the outer branches, on the other hand, are provided with one terminal spine which is moderately stout (fig. 9). The second pair appear to be more slender than the first, and the inner branches are only one-jointed and bear a single moderately long apical spine ; the outer branches, which are two-jointed, are only armed with a very short spine at the apex (fig. 10). The abdomen is very small and provided with two furcal joints which bear a few minute sete. The Amphipod on which the parasite was observed occurred in a. surface tow-net gathering collected in Aberdeen Bay on October 16, 1903. The parasite agrees very closely with the description and drawings of S. egregius, Hansen, as given in that author’s Monograph of the Choniostomatide referred to above, and therefore, though the Amphipod on which it was found (Metopa borealis, G. O. Sars) is a different species from that mentionel by Dr. Hansen as the host S. egregius, I am satisfied that the parasite I have described belongs to that species. The Amphipod on which Hr. Hansen obtained his specimens of S. egregius belonged to Metopa bruzelit (Goés.), Spheronella paradoxa, H. J. Hansen, PI. xv., fig. 17-19. 1897. Spheronella paradoxa, Hansen, The Choniostomatide, p. 118, pl. ili., fig. 41; pl. iv., fig. 1 ah. The female of this Sphwronella represented by the drawing (figs. 16 and 17) is smaller than those described by Dr. Hansen, being only ‘57 mm., whereas the smallest of the specimens mentioned by that author was ~ ‘71 mm. But with the exception of the difference in size the specimen recorded here agrees very well with the species to which it is referred. The specimen was found in the marsupium of Bathyporeia pelagica (Bate). The figure representing a side view of the parasite shows the posterior thread-like attachment considerably twisted upon itself and terminating in a sucker disc; the only other appendages visible are at the anterior end, and comprise a pair of antennules and a pair of powerful maxillipeds. Six specimens of Bathyporeia were found to be infested with Spheeronella, and all the parasites observed appeared to be adult females, The body of the female, represented by the drawings, is seen to be nearly globular, particularly when viewed from above. The antennules are three-jointed, the end joint being the longest one and the penultimate joint the smallest; they are each provided with a few setze (fig. 18). The maxillipeds (fig. 19) appear also to be three-jointed; the first joint is very large, but the other two are smaller; the third is armed with a moderately stout terminal claw, and as the articulation between the first and second joints forms a hinge, the last two joints, together with the terminal claw, can be folded upon the first, and this allows the maxillipeds to be used as powerful grasping organs. No males were observed. Habitat.—In the marsupium of Bathyporeia pelagica (Spence Bate), collected off Lossiemouth, Moray Firth, December 29, 1903. Spheronella minuta, T. Scott, sp. n. Pl. xv., fig. 11-15. An adult Spheronella was obtained in the marsupium of a specimen of Pertoculodes longimanus (Spence Bate) from the Dornoch Firth, collected by the bottom tow-net on December 28, 1903. Dorsal and side views of the specimen are represented by fig. 12, 11. The length of the specimen is ‘48 mm. (about =, of an inch). of the Fishery Board for Scotland. 252 The antennules appear to be three-jointed; the first joint is nearly twice as long as the second, while the third is equal to rather more than the entire length of the first and second (fig. 13). The first mawxillipeds are very small, and consist of a single stout joint armed with a moderately strong terminal claw (fig. 14). The second maxillipeds are rather more slender and elongated than the other pair; the basal joint is twice as long as broad; the next two are small and narrow, and appear to be hinged to the basal joint; the terminal claw, which is moderately stout, is slightly curved (fig. 15). Dr. Hansen states that he obtained female Spheronellas in the marsupiums of three specimens of Serioculodes longimanus from Denmark, and that they appeared to be identical with S. paradoxa, the only appreciable difference being their smaller size. Dr. Hansen’s exten- sive knowledge of this curious and difficult group of Crustacea precludes any doubt concerning the accuracy of the identification of these specimens. I am therefore inclined to regard the Spheronella found on the Perioculodes from the Dornoch Firth as a somewhat different form from those he observed, and have described it provisionally under a distinct specific name. This Spheronella from the Dornoch Firth Perioculodes appears to differ not only in size and shape from S. paradoxa, but also in the size and proportional lengths of the joints of the antennules and in the size and structure of the second maxillipeds, Spheronella callisome, T. Scott, sp. n. Pl. xv., fig. 20-27. The Spheronella I record under this name was obtained on a specimen of Callisoma crenata (Spence Bate) collected at the mouth of the Firth of Clyde on February 7, 1899. The parasite is an adult female and measured *86 mm. in length (=, of an inch). The body seen from above is nearly globulay and the cephalon is seen projecting somewhat beyond the anterior aspect in the form of a moderately conspicuous tubercle (fig. 21). Seen from the side the body is broadly oblong, with both the anterior and posterior ends boldly convex. The anterior portion of the body appears to be thickly beset with minute hairs (fig. 20 and 21). The antennules are three-jointed; the middle joint is very short, but the other two are moderately elongated (fig. 22). The antenne are very small and uniarticulate, and are each furnished with a single terminal seta about as long as the antennal joint (fig. 23), The mandibles are slender, elongated, and sub-cylindrical (fig. 24). The maxille are stout, and are each apparently composed of a single piece, and armed with two moderately stout terminal sete, while a third seta springs from a minute lateral process, as shown in the drawing (fig. 25). The first and second maxillipeds have each of them moderately stout basal joints, and they are each provided with strong terminal claws (fig. 26, 27). The ventral filament, which is furnished with a terminal sucker-like disc, is long and slender, and twisted upon itself as shown in fig 20. This Spheronella does not agree with any described species known to me. Spheronella cluthe, T. Scott, sp. n. Pl. xv., fig. 28-30. A single adult female of this Spheronella was obtained in the marsupium of a specimen of Harpinia pectinata, G. O. Sars,* found in a tow-net gathering collected in moderately deep water at the mouth of the Clyde estuary, and nearly midway between Ailsa Craig and Sanda Island ; this tow-net gathering was collected on November 14, 1899. * Some remarks on the distribution of this Harpinia will be found among the Notes on Amphipoda at page 256. 5 Ages ares Ait 2538 Part III.—Twenty-second Annual Report This parasite, which appears to differ from be other Spheronella known to me, measures ‘74 mm. in length (about = of aninch). Its form is almost globular, especially the dorsal view, but seen from the side the height is rather less than the width (fig. 28, 29), The only appendages that could be satisfactorily made out were the second maxillipeds, and these are moderately elongated and slender, and are each provided with a slender terminal claw (fig. 30). There does not appear to be any previous record of a Spheronella having been found on Harpinia pectinata. Spheronella pygmea, T. Scott, sp. n. Pl. xv., fig. 31-34. The adult female of this species represented by the drawings (fig. 31 and 32), whether viewed dorsally or from the side, is seen to be of a nearly oval form, the length being equal to about one and a half times the breadth. This parasite, which is very small, measures only -49 mm. in length (about J; of an inch). The antennules and antenne appear to be rudimentary, while the only appendages of which a satisfactory examination was made were the first and second maxillipeds represented by the drawings (fig. 33, 34). The first maxillipeds, which are very small and uniarticulate, are armed with a moderately stout terminal claw (fig. 33). The second maxillipeds are elongated and three-jointed; the inner distal angle of the first joint is produced: so as to forma small bifid projection ; the first and second joints are sub-equal in length; the third is small and narrow, and bears a somewhat feeble terminal claw (fig. 34). Habitat.—This small Spheronella was obtained in the marsupium of a specimen of Pseudocuma similis, G. O. Sars, No males or post-larval females were observed. There does not appear to be any previous récord of a Spheronella from this species of Pseudocuma. Spheronella amphilochi, H. J. Hansen. Pl. xv., fig. 35, 36. 1897. Spheronella amphilochi, H. J. H., op. cit., p. 139, pl. viz, fig. 3aand b The Spheronellu I record under this name was found in the marsupium of Amphilochoides odontonyx (Boeck) (= Amphilochoides pusillus, G. O. Sars).* The specimen represented by the drawing (fig. 35) isa young female, and as Dr. Hansen has only described the adult form of the species from a solitary example, a satisfactory comparison between our specimen and his description and figures could not be made. Dr. Hansen’s specimen was, however, found on the same species of Amphipod, and this favours the identification of the two parasites as being the old and young females of the same species. The young female I am recording measured only ‘14 mm. in length (about 4, of an inch), but the size of the adult described by Dr. Hansen was ‘54 mm. A specimen which appeared to be an adult female was taken from the marsupium of the same Amphipod in which the young one now recorded was obtained, but it was somehow lost ere it could be thoroughly examined and figured. The posterior part of the body of the young female is distinctly hispid, and the thoracic legs were furnished with long and slender terminal hairs, as shown in fig. 35. Near the middle of the dorsal aspect a number of slender bristles were observed. * Crustacea of Norway, vol. i. (Amphipoda), p. 222. See also the supplement to the volume, p. 690, where the author restores Boeck’ s name, A. odontonyz, for the name used in the body of ‘the work, of the Fishery Board for Scotland. 254 The second maxillipeds were moderately powerful, but the other appendages were smaller and weaker. As this young female agrees with none of the other young forms described by Dr. Hansen, I prefer for the present to regard it as the post larval stage of his Spheronella amphilocht. As a list of the genera and species of the Choniostomatide described by Dr. H. J. Hansen in his interesting work on that curious group of parasitic Copepoda may be useful, I give it here. To this list I have added the few odd forms mentioned in the preceding notes, and one or two others recorded in previous Reports. The names of the hosts on which the parasites have been obtained are also given, and I have indicated by an asterisk (*) such of the species as up till now have been observed in Scottish waters. This will show how much room still remains for further research among these minute organisms. The names of the parasites are arranged in alphabetical order on the left-hand side of the page, while the names of the hosts on which they have been found are placed immediately opposite. Names of the Parasites. Names of the Hosts. Gen. Aspidoecia. Erythrops elegans, G. O. Sars ; *Aspidoecia normant, Giard and . serrata, G. O. Sars; £. ery- Bonnier. throphihalmus (Goés.); &. microphthalmus, G. O. Sars ; and HL. abyssorwm, G. O. Sars. Gen. Choniostoma. Choniostoma hansent, Giard and | Hippolyte gaimardit, M.-Edw. and Bonnier. H. polaris (Sabine). Chontostoma mirabilis, H. J. . gammardit, M.-Edw. Hansen. Gen. Homeoscelus. Homeoscelus mediterranea, | Iphinoé trispinosa (Goodsir). 1 Ua ee Homeoscelus minuta, H. J. H. Diastylis lucifera (Kroyer). Gen. Mysidion. Mysidion abyssorum, H. J. H. Erythrops abyssorum, G. O. Sars. - commune, H. J. H. Lirythrops serrata, G. O. 8.; £. abyssorum, G. O.8.; and Par- erythrops obesa, G. O. S. Gen. Spheronella, H. J. H. (a) Spheeronellas pajrasitic on Amphipoda. Spheronella abyssi, H. J. H. Astyra abysst, Boeck. acanthozonis, H. J. H.| Acanthozone cuspidata (Lepech.). amphilochi, H. J. H. | Amphilochoides odontonyx (Boeck). 99 t (=Amphilochoides pusillus, @. O. Sars). ee antillensis, H. J. H. | Corophiwm bonelii, M.-Edw. 3s argisse, H, J, H. Argissa hamatipes, Norman (=A. typica, Boeck). 250 Part III.—Twenty-second Annual Report Names of the Parasites. Names of the Hosts. Spheronella atylr, H i et Paratylus swammerdami(M.-Edw.) bonnieri, vc bags fg s Protomedia fasciata, Kroyer. caliopti, H. J. H. Calliopius leviusculus (Kroyer). et a callisome, T. Sco Callisoma crenata, Spence Bate. BP) ‘ si capensis, H. J. cae Lemboides afer, Stebbing. x chinensis, H. J. H. Corophium bonellit, M.-Edw. % Aa cluthe, T. Scott. Harpinia pectinata, G. O. Sars. a danica, H. J. H. Corophium crassicorne (Bruz.). - dulichte, H. J. H. Dulichia monocantha, Metzger. 5s elegantula, H. J. H. | Chetrocrates sundewalli (Rathke). - Jrontalis, H. J. H. Ampelisca macrocephala, Lill}. a giardu, H. J. H. Protomedia fasciata, Kroyer. Ai gitanopsidis, H.J.H. | Gitanopsts arctica, G. O. Sars. ~ holbolli, H. J. H. Paramphithoé boeckit, H. J. H. 2 intermedia, H. J. H. | Bruzelia typica, Boeck. i irregularis, H. J. H. | Metopa rubrovittata, G. O. Sars. a leptochetra, H. J. H. | Leptochetrus guttatus, Grube. ai longipes, H. J. H. Ampelisca tenuicormis, Lill}. es messinensis, H. J. H. | Gammaropsis melanops, G. O. Sars. - metope, H. J. H. Metopu bruzelii (Goés.). Fs microcephala, Giard | Ampelisca typica, Spence Bate. and Bonnier. . * minuta, T. Scott. Perioculodes longimanus (Spence Bate). ‘ bs paradoxa, H. J. H. | Bathyporeia norvegica, G. O. Sars ; B. pelagica (Bate); and B. robertson (Bate). a Cestita, Ti. cd) « Ht. Microprotopus maculatus, Norman. (b) Spheronellas plarasitic on Isopoda. Spheronella affinis, H. J. H. Jamra maculosa, Leach. ”? 9 curtipes, H. J. H. » spinosa, Harger. munnopsidis,H. J.H.| Munnopsis typica, M. Sars. (c) Spheronellas pijarasitic on Sympoda. Spheronella decorata, H. J. H. Diastylis rathkei, Kroyer. dispar, H. J. H. Eudorella truncatula (Spence Bate). insignis, H. J. H. Diastylis cornuta, Boeck ; aud D. rostratus, Goodsir (=D. lewe Norman). marginata, H. J. H. | Iphinoé trispinosa (Goodsir). modesta, H. J. H. Eudorella emarginata (Kroyer), pygmea, T. Scott. Pseudocuma similis, G. O. Sars. Gen. Stenothocheres, H. J. H. * Stenothocheres egregius, H. J. H. 539 Metopa bruzelli (Goés), and Metopa borealis, G. O. Sars. Se TS Stenothoé marina, Spence Bate. Gen. Salenskya, Giard and Bonnier. *Salenskya tuberosa, Giard and Bonnier. Ampelisca spinipes, Boeck. of the Fishery Board for Scotland. 256 AMPHIPODA. The following notes on some species belonging to the Amphipoda and one or two other groups of the Malocostraca obtained in plankton— samples collected during the investigations recently carried out by Dr. T. Wemyss Fulton in the North Sea and the Moray Firth—may be of interest. Hyperia medusarum (O. F. Muller). This species, which appears to have a decidedly northern and Arctic distribution, and of which there is so far no authentic British record, was obtained in a surface plankton- sample collected about 180 to 185 miles east by north of Aberdeen on October 8th, 1903. One or two full-grown females and several young specimens were noticed. In the same gatherings there were observed Clione borealis and Limacina retroversa—two northern Pteropods—as well as Tryphosa nanoides, FiOElOnye cicada, and some other and commoner forms. Tryphana malmi, Boeck. This curious and brightly coloured little Amphipod occurred in a surface gathering collected off the Ord of Caith- ness, Moray Firth, on November 21st, and in a bottom gathering collected off Lossiemouth on December 29th, 1903. This is the first time I have met with Zryphana so close to the Scottish north-east coast, but the Rev. Canon A. M. Norman records its occurrence at Banff, whence specimens were seit to him many years ago by Thomas Edward.* Professor G. O. Sars in his great work on the Crustacea of Norway records this species from three different places on the west coast of Norway, and only from deep water ; he states further that Boeck also obtained it in deep water in Hardangerfjord.t The only other localities which Norman gives in his note on the distribution of the species are the Faroe Isles and North Atlantic, lat. 18° 8’, long. 30° 5’ W. (Stebbing). Tryphana malmi may, however, be less rare than the apparent dearth of information concerning its distribution would seem to imply. I have obtained it in at least two plankton-samples from the Shetland Islands, in addition to the two mentioned above.{ Anonyx nugax (Phipps). ‘This species, rarely met with in the British seas, was captured in Aberdeen Bay on December 23rd, 1903. The species was taken for the first time in Scottish waters in February, 1889; on that occasion it was obtained near May Island, at the mouth of the Forth estuary.§ It was again met with in January, 1901, in the Cromarty Firth, when specimeus collected on the 10th of that month by Mr. F. G. Pearcey were forwarded to the Fishery Board’s Laboratory at Bay of Nigg, near Aberdeen, || and the present record of its occurrence in Aberdeen Bay is the only other occasion on which it has been observed off the east coast of Scotland. None of the Scottish specimens of Anonyx nugax have attained to anything like the size of some Arctic examples, Hoplonyx cicada (Fabricius). This species, which, like the last, is also a northern form, has already been referred to in the note on Hyperia * British Amphipoda of the Tee Hyperlide, &c., dan. and Mag. Nat. Hist., (7), vol. ., p. 1383 (January 1900). + Crustacea of Norway, vol. i. ae aE p13: Conseil permanent ligehe tonal pour l’exploration de la Mer; Bull. des Results, Pt. D., for August, 1903, pp. 44-47. § Eleventh Ann. Rept. of the hes Board for Scotland, Part III., p. 212, pl. v., fig. 18-20 (1893). Nineteenth Ann. Rept. of the Fishery Board for Scotland, Pt. III., p, 258 (1901) 257 Part III—Twenty-second Annual Report medusarum ; but the largest specimen observed in the collections under consideration was obtained in the same gathering with Anonyx nugaa, from Aberdeen Bay. Though the species appears to be widely distributed along the west side of the British Islands, the records of its occurrence on the east coast of Scotland appear to be very few, and its presence in Aberdeen Bay is all the more interesting. It may be stated that the gathering from Aberdeen Bay collected on December 23rd, 1903, contained a considerable number of other species of Amphipoda besides the two I have specially mentioned, and the names of the following may be given, Acidostoma obesum, Tryphosa longipes, Ampelisca spinipes, Iphimedea minuta, and one or two fine specimens of Amathilla homart. Specimens of Diastylis rostrata and Siriella armata were also observed. Harpinia pectinata, G. O. Sars. The occurrence of the single specimen of Harpinia pectinata already mentioned in connection with Spheronella cluthe, whose host it was, is of sufficient interest to be specially referred to in these notes. ‘The only stations that may be considered as within the British limits where this species has hitherto been observed “‘are all to the west of Ireland and between Ireland and Rockall.”* Its capture at the mouth of the Clyde estuary may be an indication that it may be found in other places when carefully sought for. HH: pectinata, which seems to be confined to moderately deep water, is a form that may easily be mistaken for a more common species, the characters by which it is distinguished being not easily made out without dissection. Professor G. O. Sars speaks of it as being “by no means rare” off the south and west coasts of Norway and occurring, asa rule, in company with Z. neglecta. The Rev. T. R. R. Stebbing has seen the Clyde specimen and confirms my identification. Metopa borealis, G. O. Sars. The occurrence of this species in Aberdeen Bay has already been referred to under the Choniostomatide as one of the hosts of Stenothocheres egregius. Metopa borealis, like M. alderi and one or two other members of the same genus, has an unarmed telson, but with the assistance of Professor G. O. Sars’ excellent mono- graph, it need not be confounded with any of the other species referred to. MM. borealis is a northern form, but appears to have a fairly wide distribution ; it is one of the rarer forms recorded by Dr. Robertson from the Hirth of Clyde. Paratylus falcatus, Metzger. One or two specimens of Paratylus falcatus were obtained in a tow-net gathering collected in the Dornoch Firth on December 26th, 1903. Though this Paratylus bears a strong resemblance to P. uncinatus, G. O. Sars, the tooth-like posterior projec- tions of the segments of the metasome on the dorsal aspect readily distinguish it. I have found both forms in Scottish waters, but neither of them very common. Megaluropus agilis, Norman. This somewhat curious species, readily distinguished by the peculiar form of the eyes, was obtained in a bottom plankton-sample collected on December 29th about three miles off Lossiemouth, Moray Firth. ISOPODA. Idothea neglecta, G.O. Sars. Professor G. O. Sars in his great work cn the Crustacea of Norway, now in course of publication, has in Volume II. * British Amphipoda, by Rey. A. M. Norman; Ann. and Mag. Nut. Hist., (7), vol. v., p. 887 (April, 1900), R — ." - ae eS of the Fishery Board for Scotland. 258 (Isopoda) described as distinct species one or tivo forms which previously have apparently been included with the Isopod known as Jdotea tricuspt- data, which was in consequence considered to bea variable species. One of the forms referred to, which Professor Sars has raised to specific rank is named by him Jdothea neglecta,* and he states concerning it that it “occurs along the whole Norwegian coast from Christiania Fjord to Vadsi, and is often found in great abundance among decaying alge in depths ranging from six to twenty fathoms.” This form is probably not un- common round the coasis of Scotland, and is, I think, included among the varieties of ‘ Jdotea tricuspidata’ described in Bate and Westwvod’s Sessile-eyed Crustacea.t Idothea neglecta appears to be moderately frequent in some parts of the Clyde estuary ; my friend Mr. Alexander Patience of Glasgow, who first directed my attention to its occurrence in the Clyde, has obtained a considerable number of specimens, which he has been kind enough to let me examine, and there are several specimens in the collection in the Fishery Board’s Laboratory, Bay of Nigg, which are also from the Clyde district. The average size of the male of this Jdothea is stated by Sars to be 25 millimetres in length (=1 inch). One of the specimens in the Laboratory is, however, much larger than that, being 33 — millimetres, while others in the same collection measure 28, 27, 25, and 20 millimetres. The female is much smaller than the male, its average size being, according to Sars, only 16 miliimetres. All the specimens in the Laboratory have been collected in different parts of upper Loch Fyne during 1897 and 1899, Idothea neglecta has not yet been recorded from the east coast of Scotland. SYMPODA. Hudorellopsis deformis (Kroyer). This curious little species was obtained in a plankton-sample collected by the s.s. ‘‘Glenogle” about fifty miles to the eastward of the May Island, Firth of Forth, on August 20th, 1903 ; the species has been observed in various other localities, but very sparingly and usually in moderately deep water. Pseudocuma similis, G. O. Sars. This species has already been referred to as the host of Spheronella pygmea under the Choniostomatide ; a few specimens occurred in a plankton-sample collected in moderately deep water about three miles off Lossiemouth, in the Moray Firth, on December 29th, 1903. Pseudocuma similis resembles the more common LP. cercaria very closely, and this may be the reason it has only recently been recognised as a British species. A considerable number of other microcrustaceans, more or less interest- ing, have been noticed in various plankton-samples collected during the recent fishery investigations carried out under the direction of Dr, Fulton in the North Sea and Moray Firth. These may be described in a sub- sequent paper dealing more generally with that group of marine organisms. I take this opportunity to substitute other generic names in room of two that have recently been adopted for certain forms of Copepoda, but which I now find to be pre-occupied. (a). Genus Platypsyllus, T, Scott, Twentieth Report of the Pishery Board for Scotland (1902), Pt. III., p. 455. I fird that Platypsyllus was used in 1869 both by Dr. Ritsema and Professor Westwood for a * Crustacea of Norway, vol. ii., p. 84., pl. xxxv. fig. 1. + British Sessile-eyed Crustacea, vol. ii., p, 381, text figs. 259 . Part ITI.—Twenty-second Annual Report genus of Coleoptera, its use by me for a genus of Copepoda must therefore lapse, and the name I propose to substitute for it is Jeanedla, the diminu- tive of the proper name Jean. (6) Genus Paranthessius, T. Scott, Zwenty-jirst Report of the Fishery Board for Scotland (1903), Pt. Til., p. 120. This name has already been used by Professor Claus for a genus of Copepoda different from that described in the Report mentioned, and it must therefore be replaced by another, and the name [ propose to substitute for it is Heteranthessius. DESCRIPTION OF THE PLATES. PLATE XIII. Monstrilla longicornis, I. C. Thompson. Diam. Fig. 1. Female, dorsal view : } ; : : . xe ‘ Fig, 2. Male, dorsal view ‘ : , x 35. Fig. 3. Antennule, female : : ; - * a Fig. 4. Fifth pair of thoracic feet, female : : : 0 ee eine Fig. 5. Abdomen and caudal furca, female : : . eee Fig. 6. Antennule, male x “BBs Fig. 7. Abdomen and caudal furca, male, ventr al aspect x? "B08 Monstrilla gracilicauda, Giesbrecht. Fig. 8. Female, dorsal view : : : : : ee fn Fig. 9. Antennule, female : 4 : : .. * aa Fig. 10. Abdomen and caudal furca, female, ; ; : aati Monstrilla grandis, Giesbrecht. Fig. 11. Female, dorsal view : : - E : . eae Fig. 12. Male, dorsal view ‘ ; : : : 2) eS eiexeee Monstrilla anglica, Lubbock. Fig. 13. Female, dorsal view : : ; : A tek tiene Monstrilla dubia, 'T. Scott, sp. n, Fig. 14. Female, dorsal view ; : : : : «oh eee Thaumaleus rigidus, I. C. Thompson. Fig. 15. Female, dorsal view : 5 : : : =D Ka Fig. 16. Antennule, female ; ‘ : | x aee Fig. 17, Fifth pair of thoracic feet, female é ; : ees? Thaumaleus zetlandicus, T. Scott, sp. n. Fig. 18. Female, dorsal view 5 : 5 : : lt eee Fig. 19. Male, dorsal view : : ; : : |. Tie PLATE XIV. Thaumaleus thompsoni, Giesbrecht. Fig. 1. Female, dorsal view x 20°5. Hig. 72: Antennule, female : x POs Fig. 3. Fifth pair of thoracic feet, female ‘ ; ae Fig. 4. Abdomen and caudal furea female ' re) Relea Fig. Fig. Fig. Fig. Fi 8. Fig. Fig. Fig. Fig. Fig. Fig. Fig. Fig. Fig. Fig. Fig. Fig. Fig. Fig. Fig. Fig. OO MI o> Or » Lo. . 16. ard WEE ke: SE He OO of the Fishery Board for Scotland. Thaumaleus rostratus, T. Scott, sp. n. . Female, dorsal view . Antennule, female . Fifth pair of thoracic feet, female . Abdomen and caudal furca, female Monstrilla grandis, Giesbrecht. : Antennule, female . Fifth pair of thoracic feet, female . Abdomen and caudal furea, female Monstrilla anglica, Lubbock. ; Antennule, female . Fifth pair of thoracic feet, female . Abdomen and caudal furca, female Monstrilla gracilicauda, Giesbrecht, Fifth pair of thoracic feet, female Monstrilla dubia, T. Scott, sp. n. Antennule, female Fitth pair of thoracic feet, female Abdomen and caudal furca, female Thaumaleus rigidus, I. C. Thompson. Abdomen and caudal furca, female Thaumaleus zetlandicus, T. Scott, sp. n. . Antennule, female . Fifth pair of thoracic feet, female 2. Abdomen and caudal furca, female PLATE XV. Monstrilla grandis, Giesbrecht. . Antennule, male . . Abdomen and caudal furca, female Thaumaleus zetlandicus, T. Scott, sp. n. . Antennule, male. . Abdomen and caudal furca, male Stenothocheres egregius, Han. . Side view, female Dorsal view, female ‘Antennule, female . Antenna, female. . Foot of first pair . Foot of second pair Spheronella minuta, T. Scott, sp. n. . Female, side view . Female, dorsal view . Antennule . First maxilliped . : : . Second maxilliped ‘ 7 ; : Diam. x 26°5. pea hej B xg: x 79: occas x lS, Kotigee x 9a. xe O79; x OT. x 79. x 64. x 106. ere TO x 130. xa CE x 72 x. "79: on Dar x 106. Baw at pce): Gere aoe x S21 x 781. x 781. x 781. x 106. x 106. x 781. x Jol. > DEV is) Ie 261 Part III.—Twenty-second Annual Report. Spheronella paradoxa, Han. Diam Fig. 16. Female, side view : : : : : oh ee Fig. 17. Female, dorsal view 2 : : : age Fig. 18. Antennule : : 4 : : ; 2 xX "isk Fig. 19. Maxilliped ; ‘ : eae Spheronella callisome, T. Scott, sp. n. Fig. 20. Female, side view Fig. 21. Female, dorsal view Fig. 22. Antennule Fig. 23. Antenna . Fig. 24. Mandible. Fig. 25. Maxilla . : Fig. 26. First maxilliped . Fig. 27. Second maxilliped Mink KM XK eK K ~J Qo —_ Spheronella cluthw, T. Scott, sp. n. Fig. 28. Female, side view x 64. Fig. 29. Female, dorsal view x 64. Fig. 30. Second maxilliped x 79°5. Spheronella pygmea, T. Scott, sp. n. Fig. 31. Female, side view x 106. Fig. 32. Female, dorsal view x 106. Fig. 33. First Maxilliped % FSE Fig. 34. Second Maxilliped x 390. Spheronella amphilocht, Harn Fig. 35. Female, side view 5 x 521. Fig. 36. Antennule of the same . x 781. ESLER del. ad nat. wo: { . icorT, 5 eS 5 a Cs a ms ~“ ee. . “ a | \ : \ = | Hl Scort, del. ad nat. sop ens a a os & a [o) oe fa a del, ad nat. Bcort, 7S Ss : 2g =o EE NRA AS 3 y ‘Tl yvh* Vyyer 52-448 8! pepapele Pl tales eitla Pi aL inl a . 4 ® e& ” | (mi, | agin ng annie? eae | , {se io» a 4 4 Rige NAY) in, Ra ia . oonhs as Shr : Meee the Bgl 408 pail 44 a * ip. al sh ie Hofh. Boe: Aer eda. © 4 4 - 4&0. ah » ab hy Atay ARAM Eh oOeRhaAaaeso aMinacapoannaaeiee.- secgua. Nee? el ‘yi. 4, Ff Tie ia taeda Br thd | Rineieres Biba. 8 Bae ant, ats N ty i Lae , A>, BT Pen oi Ya, yt yn gon!) Ps ih yr - aan “BAs Vim Ree es ‘ 1m, Vaal i C of iP... lel % ™ Mere, Lb Bain hk WAR 2 oy sa aens B ~ mht Pere 1 Shor: 4a a My ann $ hay’ ad) + eee By. N98 aay “_ ‘whe Mara: A : -. Ay’ ts Bay. wiht oa. ane Mayne Sinan Po arpa Sy ea sara UTR G WUT, Acne AILS Dhue DP pean te usta dpoteset me I tt WY aan Bhtas nae nan ALT gated atiandds Wasane htigbera, cateclii! Vy CAR ra ||| | lah a af saat samen Ny ~~ ‘wat ane “Mo : TH aay Oh tag ae ss Mata nger notte Ge a ry 7". = oe ig eer eabenanees dee atm Bh May, fl LI | A i : , " oa anys: RaaGien | Wu ueattey- “Rana, ahe “op ie thes, niaeee sat eke Sessa 7 ad iden | ad : ‘apd 4 soe , oe anh nee it $0 ites Be ~ é i en | ee rs ye eae DLA ee” Ge PNR ce Se a | ist 5 eo | oe xe eoeeecel fight 4 Lup yryr yyy , Fea fhe bil bet. “I UY te RABIN s af nw Nando, a mS ‘, i Ss ins ! ah. 4 § , ha vi . lan ue j = ic Pe - we em - Ws YN 9m ins MANS 4; ee Pe) ‘Yy BA. \a 4 mr Ld 1 Nige are ‘ Pay PL ey : Rig ~ . pa Wig’ ty 5 ® ¢ Wan's Se > THA ad ‘A SAG 9” \ NAN ¢ 7 = i Lt So *< = Ser to na as BRS 4 ka ae BUTIARCRGREADD Dh? pa a5 & Vel ‘e ~, ity ua Ss $40 LY V¥ . eal Vin N em Se iy Ja, ice 4 ha 1 ie i tt 1. te val ' { ‘J #h % e s fA, ‘ a Ba eer {Tf iv yalbhinne én Vaay Te yaa, hi See eels MG, raah | y) ) Ls meets | e oe ae es —V Aw Oe -7 aa, SP ha ii) p SAQA ; “p25 & Nistw BEY | 1 al als >ARD, ph * Pv ae ry al Aye.” bent ok ac Wy AAG pli \ aapent 1 ~Vnaygah, e882: ~~ on MAANita an. tas ny Vy Tred an yuh sale Ge 98e ney. Sena saw 4 Ye N a\ Nene cee Pile ewan Diesescas ae ette. iy ‘4 ° | ey ada SSAA Phar, ity yan! My 1) é ‘ eT nets Or) Ma a rave were AP Fhe, tf ft \t. he, Anke a4 aie | TF Som veh am rir » MIRO U CORR Pe De SU mRe Ay «aoe “Seaeten.p@Gnae ba es a Ahag See ee salina ered - Diintsiaeeietee Welt U1 He EET aces bias: ‘ “a anh Ree , Sa vs\ Bed a. A ; Lal | | ie, gh el 3 Sens, ‘et | pak a ~e oe er r\ % ry a B r af j TRH ree 5 oe A (Ny MT elas ‘eael tt | \s phe oe’ altg OM PHATE yesah yO wll AAA aL DH acs aan A . = 4 4 ie OW « p par Miler 1,20 “ BI ney ELAS SRCLSRASS ty peli Teepe aaa n ; ) BA ® wg ee | ~ 4 Vy ] 14 $ or" s Re. Ar,. Shao : “hp VLARSs ssa.» | Aan OA. WP 2g via ee pameriees ~, to ‘al Dai. We eer. . Aa b A. \ vel | | hy Bay | e A j : ‘gpl? ’ Ab ~ Bo nia wus rg ny : | 4 hanGata- es ads ~ we a" ans oe be gruev™ = ~.,. a, "7 pan TPCT si ltetnnres 11 a LUE vivant seeecane NY ARSE eeee ae P Seeeeean a . : spAar hus TERT 14 . Seeeee Be Pete THT AL TUT a eer SocgwiBNRalih., “eran Mies aaa pe : 2 SA By, an 4". es Peles ab oe AY phy Ne: ¢ é . ‘ : a nee ti} z ‘Aaa - a pipe ry brent | e VY Pie it 3 , (a > r et | HiT ‘A hath A le As her AAs eke be 4p f*.- Ape odJe ap a amAvotth ae re \, a iv il. i Mw bi ay ib neeaae ship Ww? ae rt SAR, B fea. NN. TOPLEL TT Ate ie ap pJfnis! wine WV clale - »@87° 9. eo fat: f%N ea ‘ ” fe Paueta ‘-~- an? Py ; TT ret ig gaae* di ee LLL TT TARA Let ; ‘el j 4 » & a .7 aYy.- panne v TTT TL Ane ONL il a ak re e . Sy \ ar ) oe 5’, - \ Me ae fr» ‘wa, Sa Aen ye »~ ,iB\e if ee, y % a’ J -4, ANAS "ony wt CYR orca en eery er LTLEL TMi LEC Po aes 4.5, mow Lilg ds mw aah Rane ; ay dnt 7 Aine seegan! ee j t ras| fe a. 5 SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION LIBRARIES UNIT 3 9088 00048 5565