,^ [ 507 ] XV. Observations on the Uraniidce, a Family of Lepidopterous Insects, with a Syti&pm of the Family and a Monograph q/" Coronidia, one of the Genera of which it is comjwsed. By J. O. Westwood, Jf.A., F.L.S., &c. (Plates LXXXV.-LXXXVIII.) Received March 18th, read April 16th, 1878. It is now more than forty years ago since there appeared in the Transactions of this Society a memoir by Mr. W. S. MacLeay, and a notice in the ' Annales ' of the French Entomological Society by M. Boisduval, in which were first made known the trans- formations of two of the most splendid of Lepidopterous insects. These insects had, up to that time, been regarded by most writers as butterflies, but were proved, by the details then made known, to belong to the Heterocerous division of the order, although their day-flying habits, and the extraordinary brilliancy of their colours, had naturally led to their having been considered as belonging to the Rhopalocera or true butterflies. M. Boisduval has well described one of these insects as " ce magnifique Lepidoptere, le plus beau de la creation." Hence, as well as in consequence of the singular manner in which systematic writers on the order have treated the position of the different members of the group to which these brilliant insects belong, and their interesting metamorphoses, it will not be considered irrelevant to the special subject of this me- moir to enter into some details upon the subject, more especially as some very difficult questions as to the rules of nomenclature are involved in the inquiry. Amongst the species of his great genus Pajnlio, containing the whole of the day- flying Lepidoptera, Linna;us introduced Pajjilio leilus, P. orontes, P. pafroclus, and P. lunus, to which were added in the last century Papilio rhipheus by Drury, and P. sloanus and P. empedocles by Cramer. Another species belonging to this group was added by Cramer, but regarded by him as a moth, under the name of Phalcena orithea. In 1807 there appeared in the sixth volume of Illiger's Magazine a posthumous sketch of the proposed division of the Lepidoptera into genera by Fabricius, who had previous to his death published his separate works on the Coleoptera {Eleutherata, F.), Hymenoptera (Piezata, F.), Diptera (Antliata, F.), and Hemiptera (Ehyngota, F.), in which each of these orders of insects had been cut up into very numerous genera. In this sketch of the Lepidoptera' Fabricius placed at the head of the order (followed by the other numerous genera of butterflies) his new genus Urania, shortly charac- ' Mr. J. G. Children published an English abstract of the proposed system of Fabricius in the ' Philosophical Magazine and Annals ' for February 1830. VOL. X. — PART XII. No. 1. — June \st, 1879. 4 a c\ql334- 508 PKOF. J. O. WESTWOOD OX THE UEA^'IID.E. terized, with P. leilus and P. patrodus mentioned as two of the seven species of which it was stated to be composed, the names of the other five species not being given. The name Urania proposed by Fabricius for this new genus had unfortunately been, then recently, applied by Schreber to a genus of plants of the natural order Musacese, from Madagascar, to «hich Adanson, Sonnerat, and Jussieu had previously given the name of Bavenala, which the tree also bears in Madagascar. It is true that the name Urania is still "unjustifiably"^ retained for the tree in botanical works; but surely it ought to give way to Bavenala, in which case Urania would be free for use in ento- mology^. It moreover does not appear to me objectionable to employ a generic name for a group of objects in one kingdom of nature which has already been, and is even still in use in a difiercnt kingdom. I should therefore not hesitate on both these grounds to retain the generic name of Urania in entomology, and to consider the first species named by Fabricius (P. leilus) as its type, that particular species being a good repre- sentative of the group of new species which have subsequently been described as most closely allied to P. leilus. In like manner, as P. leilus and the other new species allied to it are good representatives of the whole group, I did not hesitate in my new edition of Drury's work on Exotic Insects, nor do I now, to consider Urania as the type of the family to which to which I applied and still retain the name of Uraniidae, it having in more recent times been deemed advisable to split up the genus Urania into smaller genera. In 1816, Hiibner, evidently profiting by the publication of the Fabrician system in lUiger's Magazine, retained the previously mentioned species in a single subdivision of his great phalanx Geometrae, forming them into the first family Heroicaj of his 4th geometrideous stirps. Lares, and subdividing them as follows in his ' Verzeichniss,' pp. 289,290:— Coitus 1. Laruxd^: LARUNDA, Orithmria (Orithea, Cram. 262. C, D). Coitus 2. Lyss.k : LYSSA, AchiUaria (Patroclus, Cram. 198. A), and Patroclaria (Patroclus, Linn., Cram. 109. A, B) . Coitus 3. AxciDEs: ALCIDIS, Orontiaria {Orontes, Linn., Cram. 83. A, B). Coitus 4. Chrysiridi^: CHRYSIRIDIA, Riphearia [Ripheus, Cram. 385. A, B). Coitus 5. UranijE: URANIA, Sloanaria [Sloanus, Cram. 85.P], F); U. leilaria {Leilus, Linn., Cram. 85. C,D). Coitus 6. Mani.e : MANIA, Empedoclaria {Empedocles, Cram. 199. A, B) ; M. candilunaria {Lunus, Linn., Cram. 200. A) ; M. lunigeraria [Liinus, Cram. 200. B, C). These six subdivisions form so many genera which it is desirable still to retain. ' To use the phrase of Loudon, Encycl. of Plants, p. 245. - 31. Boisduval (Nouv. Aun. du Mus. ii. p. 2G0) perceived the inconvenience of the same name being em- ployed in cntomolo{r>- and botany, but considered that the long usage of the name Urania in entomology out- •weighed such inconvenience. " 8i le nom do ce genre n'etoit adoptc depuis long-temps par la plupart des entomologistee, il seroit convenable de le changer parce qu'il existo deja un genre des plantes appele Urania." PKOF. J. O. WESTWOOD ON THE URANIIDtE. 509 It has happened, however, unfortunately for these names of Hiibner that nearly all of them haA-e given rise to disputes upon points of nomenclature. The name of Hiibner's first group, Larunda had been used by Dr. Leach in 1814-15 for a genus of Crustacea, to which the name of Ci/amus had been given by Lamarck in 1801, and adopted by Latreille (as quoted by Leach himself in Linn. Trans, xi. p. 364, where the name Larunda was proposed). It is still undecided whether a name which has been proved to be a synonym can subsequently be used for a different genus in a different group. The difficulty here might have been solved by the employment of Latreille's generic name Coronis (proposed in the ' Families Naturelles' in 1825, and in the second edition of the ' Eegne Animal' m 1829) for the Larundm of Hiibner, only that it still more unfortunately happened— 1st, that the name Coronis itself had been proposed by Hiibner in his ' Verzeichniss,' 1816, p. 265, for a totally different genus belonging to the Noctuida; {Phal. stollii. Cram. pi. 310. figs. A, B) ; 2ndly, that Coronis had also been actually proposed by Latreille himself for a genus of Squillideous Crustacea, to which it is still applied, in the work in which he also gave it to the Lepidopterous genus in question ; and, Srdly, that in 1827 Coronis had been given to a genus of passerine birds by Gloger, to which, however, the name of Gymnoderus had been given in 1809 by Geoftroy. This is the more annoying because for nearly fifty years the generic name of Coronis has been universally applied to Phalcena orithea, Cramer, and its congeners by all entomologists, except Dr. Felder, who in 1875 used the objection- able Hiibnerian name Larunda, but with reservation. Although, as I have said above, I do not consider it unadvisable to employ the same generic name in two different kingdoms of nature, I can scarcely go so far as to think it proper to use the same name for a genus of birds, a genus of Crustacea, and a genus of Noctuideous moths (for if used in Lepidoptera, Hiibner's appropriation of the name has the priority). It has, I know, been proposed recently to treat the ' Verzeichniss ' of Hiibner as a nullity ; but I cannot agree to the proposal. In many respects, indeed, this work is most unsatisfactory; but where the author has made (as he has often done) good arrangements of the multitudinous species of Lepi- doptera, which had up to his days been in a chaotic state of confusion (either as regards their family distribution or the juxtaposition of the different species), I think it is an act of justice to give him credit for his work. To prevent farther confusion I therefore propose in this memoir to employ the name Coronis in a slightly modified form, Coronidia. Hiibner's second name, Ijyssa, is also liable to the objection that in 1815 Dr. Leach had used Lissa for a genus of Crustacea, for which it is still retained. The same name was also used generically in Diptera by Meigen in 1820. To avoid this confusion, I propose to modify Hiibner's name into Lyssidia. The name Alcides, proposed by Dalman in 1820 for a genus of Coleopterous weevils, is, of course, posterior to the employment oi Alcidis by Hiibner in 1816 ; I propose, VOL. X. — PART MI. No, 2. — Juuc Isf, 1879. 4 b 510 PROF. J. O. WESTWOOD ON THE URANIID^. therefore, to retain Hiibner's name, with a .slightly altered termination, fur uniformity, into Alcidia. The name Chrysindia, given by Hiibner to P. riphcus, is a happy one, and may be retained for that brilliant insect; but it has unfortunately happened for Hubner's last name, Mania, that it has been employed by Treitschke for a genus of Noctuidae, for which it is still retained by Guenee and H. Doubleday ; I therefore have the less hesi- tation in altering Hiibner's name into Manidia, and in rejecting the subsequent name given to it of Sematura. In 1825 the Swedish naturalist Dalman, in his monograph of Castnia, neglected the arrangements of Fabricius and Hiibner, blaming the former for inserting P. orontes, Linn., in the genus Castnia, with the observation " quae vero species minime hujus generis sed ad Xyctalideas nostras pertinet, etsi transitum memorabilem Papilionides inter et Nyctalideas bene offert. Genera hue pertinentia sequenti modo distribuere tentavimus : " CvDiMoN : Ripheus, Sloaiietis, Leilus et forte Lavinia Fabr. = Gen. Urania Fabr. Latr.' Nyctalemon : Oronles, Patroclus. Sematura : Lunus, JEgistus Fabr., Empedocles Herbst." To which he adds Thysania with agrippina, odora, &c., as types, evidently identical with the Noctuideous genus Erebus, and also doubtfully the genus Agarista of liCach (Zool. Misc. i. tab. xv.). It will be seen that the genus Cydimon of Dalman is equivalent to the Chrysiridia and Urania of Hiibner, that Nyctalemon, Dalm.,= the LyssK and Alcides of Hiibner, and that Sematura, Dalm., = Mania of Hiibner. In 1840 (Introd. Mod. Class. Ins. ii. p. -369) I separated these insects into a single family placed between the Sphingidse and Anthroceridae. In 1854 Mr. "Walker, in his Catalogue of the Collection of the British Museum (Lepidoptera Heterocera, Pt. 1), adopted the genera Urania for Leilus and Rhipheus, Nyctalemon for Orontes and Patroclus, to which he added Lunus and its allies (gen. Sematura, Dalman), and Coronis; which last, notwithstanding its intimate relation- ship with Sematura, Lunus, &c., ho placed in the family Castnii, as Latreille had done. Lastly, in 1857, M. A. Guenee (Hist. Nat. Ins. Lep. tom. ix.) has arranged all the preceding genera into one group, Uranides, at the head of his Phalenites ( Geometra. Linn.), divided into four families : 1. CydimonidjE : Gen. Cydimon {Leilus kc). 2. Uranid^: Gen. Urania {Rhipheus). 3. "NvcTALiEMONiD.ii : Gcu. Alcidis {Orontes) and Nyctalemon {Patroclus &c.). 4. Sematuiiid;B : Gen. Sematura {Lunus kc.) and Coronis {Oril/iea kc). ' "Obs. Uraniic nonioii pro iusectorum genere nullo modo admittendum, etenim jamdiu ijluularum genus, notibsimum quidom, sic vocaiuni." PEOF. J. O. WESTWOOD ON THE UEANIID^. 511 Adopting the opinion of M. Boisduval, that the group before us will not enter into any of our generally received families, and that it is " une de ces creations a part, qui envoie a la fois un rameau vers plusieurs groupes, mais que Ton ne pent faire entrer convenablement dans aucun " (Mon. Agarist. p. 7, extr. Rev. et Mag. de Zoologie), we must now investigate the natural relationships of this most interesting group of insects, wliich have been alternately regarded as butterflies and moths. Thus Linnaeus regarded the more typical species as butterflies, and Fabricius even [)laced them at the head of the day-flying genera. Dalman, as we have already seen, considered that P. orontes formed the transition between the Papilionidas and the other Uraniidae. Latreille (Gen. Crust, et Ins. iv. p. 207) gave Urania and Hesperia as the two terminal genera of the Diurna, and Castnia (into which he introduced P. orontes) as the first genus of the Sphingides. The same arrangement was employed in the 9th volume of the ' Encyclopedic methodique,' where Godart divided the genus Urania into four groups :— A, Ripheus ; B, Sloaneiis and Leiliis ; C, Orontes and Patroclus ; D, Lunus and Empedocles. In 1825 (Fam. Nat. du Regne An. p. 470), and in 1829 (Regne An. 2nd edit. iv. p. 387), Hesperia and Urania are still given by Latreille as two genera of Hesperiido', and Castnia, Coronis, and Agarista of Leach as forming the first tribe {Hcsperi-Spthinges) at the head of the Sphingidae. This arrangement continued unchanged by Latreille to the last, and was adopted by his more immediate French followers. It had, however, in the meantime met with opposition in Germany and Sweden, Hiibner in 1816, as we have already seen, having placed the entire group amongst the Geometridae, while Dalman had removed them from the Diurnal Lepidoptera to form, his uncharacterized group Nyctalidese with P. 07'ontes as the connecting link between them and the butterflies. M. Guenee, however, did not hesitate in 1857 entirely to reject their relationship with the Diurna, showing that with respect to the characters derived from the spring and socket at the base of the wings, the form of the antennae and palpi, the structure and armature of the legs, and tlie venation of the wings, together with the form of the larvae, so far as known at that time, these insects had no real relation with the Diurnal Lepidoptera (Hist. Nat. Ins. Lep. ix. p. 3), that they formed one entire group, and that they ought to be placed among the Noctuma ; in fact, although by being placed by some writers at the head of the Heterocera their supposed relationship with the Hesperiidae has been in a manner kept up, the pointed tips of the antennae of some of the species, and the spines on the hind legs favouring such a view, they exhibit no real relationship with the Hesperiidae. In like manner a comparison of the structural details which I have given in the accompanying plates, with those of the Castniidae and Hepialidae published in my re- cent memoir on the former family in the ' Transactions of the Linnean Society,' will clearly show that the relationship of Coronis with Castnia as indicated by Latreille, and that of Urania with Castnia as suggested by Macleay in this Society's ' Transactions,' i. p. 188, must be completely ignored. 4b2 512 PROF. J. 0. WESTWOOD ON THE URANIID.E. Rejecting, then, the Rhopalocera (including the Hesperiidae), the typical Sphingidae, CastniidjE, and Hepialidae, together with the whole of the Microlepidoptera, we have to inquire which of the remaining Macrolepidopterous groups show the greatest amount of affinity to the Uraniida;. If we regard the Noctuida?, we find a robust body with comparatively small wings formed for powerful fliglit, and generally marked with a peculiar reniform and a cir- cular spot or patch in the middle of the fore wings ; the antenna? are also almost invariably slender and setaceous, becoming gradually attenuated to the tip. In this family, however, is found a group [Erebus'^) with the palpi elongated, terminated by a slender joint, which probably induced Dalman to place them, under the name of Thysania, Avith the Uraniidae. Plate LXXXVI. fig. 4 represents the head oi Erchus [I'atula) macrops, Linn., Guen. (Bubo. Fabr., Donovan, Ins. (llhina, pi. 44. f. 1). Tlie venation of the wings, however (Plate LXXXVI. tig. 1 fore wing, and fig. 2 hind wing of the male, and fig. 3 hind wing of the female), of the same Indian species of Erebm denuded of scales, is entirely different from that of any of the Uraniidae, the fore wings having the small subcostal cell {sc. c) and the lower discoidal vein (cS') arising close to the base of the third branch [c 3) of the median vein from a very short transverse discocellular vein. Mr. MacLeay, in his memoir on Urania, noticed the resemblance between the more or less spherical eggs of Urania and Catocala. The last-named genus, however, is an aberrant one in the family Noctuidae ; and the oology of the Lepidoptera has not been sufficiently studied to allow much weight to be given to the character of the eggs of these insects. At all events, as Mr. MacLeay remarked, the form of the eggs of Urania is a very common one in Lepidopterous insects. Hence we may reject the Noctuidae from amongst the near relations of the Uraniidae. Of the remaining families, typified by the Linnean genera Bombyx and Geouictra^ M. Guenee is decidedly in favour of the latter : — " II me semble," says he (Hist. Nat. Ins. Lep. ix. p. 4), " qu'aucune ne pent hitter a cet egard avec les Geometres. Nous retrouvons d'abord dans la premiere faraille de ces dernieres que personne ne sera tente de disputer aux Phalenes une nervulation [venation] exactement semblable. Les antennes quoique legerement renflees pres du sommet chez plusieurs Uranides, sont fili- formes ou plutot setacees, et tout le raonde sait que ce n'est que chez les Geometra que cette forme est vraiment normale. L' absence des stemmates et des taches reniformes et orbiculaires suffit pour les eloigner des Noctuelles et les rapprocher des Geometra oil ces caracteres manquent egalement. Les queues des ailes inferieures, avec les taches ocellees qui les accompagnent ne se retrouvent que chez les Geometres de la premiere famille ou chez les Saturnides qui les precederont dans la distribution que j'ai adoptee. L'aspect general des deux dernieres families, leurs ailes minces, etendues, leur vol diurne ' JI. lioisduval (in Nouv. Ann. du Mils. ii. p. 2G0j introduced the gonus Urania bet\V(.'eu Erebus and the Gcometrida?. PEOr. J. O. WESTWOOD ON THE UEANIID.^. 513 les poussent encore vers cette division. Quant aux premiers etats, il y a sons doute du pour et du contre, cependant ceux de Y Urania rhipheus sont tellement decisifs, que personne n'a hesite a la rejeter dans les Phalenes." Mr. Packard, in his fine monograph upon the American Geometrideous Moths, goes even further than M. Guenee. On account of the structure of the head^ in the Ura- nides he cannot agree with Guenee in regarding them as a family distinct from the Geometridse. He adds, " The venation is also much as in the Phalaenidae " (a group of the Geometridae), there being only three median nervules, on which account he regards them as forming the highest subfamily of the Phalsenidse. " I am aware that the larvte have sixteen feet, no other Phalsenid having more than fourteen " (Mon. p. 22). Mr. Packard, who has devoted six plates and nearly 150 figures to represent the venation of the wings of the genera of Geometrideous moths, gives the following as the general character of the venation of the family : — " Usually six subcostal venules, always but three median venules ; no submedian vein, sometimes a fold representing it. A subcostal cell often present, sometimes two, the cell being formed almost invariably by the anastomosis of the first subcostal venule with its vein. Independent vein well marked, usually in the middle of the discal space " (p. 16). I have copied from Mr. Packard's plates one of the most characteristic figures of the fore wings of the Geometridae (Plate LXXXVI. fig. 7), representing that of Ihjdfia undulata, Packard (pi. i. fig. 14), in which we see two small prediscoidal cells distinct from the costal vein, the upper discoidal vein (b5«) arising at a distance beyond the discoidal cell from what I consider as normally constituting the basal portion of the branch B 2 or more probably of B 3. . In the fore wing of Eumacaria Irumiearia, Packard (pi. iii. fig. 7), we see only a single small prediscoidal cell, the first branch of the subcostal vein uniting with the costal vein near its extremity, Avhilst the upper discoidal vein (b5») extends backwards so as to form the upper extremity of the discoidal cell, the basal portion of the upper discoidal vein being the upper discocellular veinlet of E. Doubleday, and the lower discoidal vein (c3*) arising halfway between the branch B5» and c"j from an oblique veinlet, the upper part of which forms the middle discocellular veinlet of E. Doubleday, and the lower part being his lower dis- cocellular veinlet. On looking over Mr. Packard's numerous figures of the veining of the wings, we see ' The following are the characters of the head of C'l/diiiion le'dus (which, following Guenee, ilr. Packard has introduced at the end of the Geometridae) given hy the last-named writer : — " Cydimon leilus (pi. vi. f. 25'). The occiput and epicranium are small and narrow, the antennte being in- serted on the summit of the head ; the epicranium is very small, the basal joints of the antennae being large and near together. The clypcus occupies the entire front, being much longer than broad, narrow, tlie sides parallel, not narrowing in front, and the surface flush with the eyes ; the front edge is slightly arcuato, being slightly produced in the middle of the edges, with lateral foramina distinct. Mandibles rather long, incurved, and with the usual dense golden seta; lying over the base of the maxillae. Labrum small, narrow. Maxill.e \\ ell developed." 514 PROr. J. O. WESTWOOD ON THE URANIID^,. tliat the tendency to form one, two, or even three small cells by the brauchlets of the subcostal vein more or less anastomosing together, near the middle of the fore margin of the fore wing, is one of the most constant characters of the Geometridae. No such small cell occurs in the Uraniida;' ; nor, as Mr. Packard remarks, is any Geometrideous larva known having the normal number of sixteen feet, in consequence of which the peculiar mode of locomotion exhibited by the " looper " caterpillars of the latter family is rendered necessaiy. In the Uraniidae, on the contrary, the larvae have sixteen feet ; for, even in that of Urania rhiphcus, as described by M. Sganzin, " il n'y avait aucune interruption de pattes," although when walking they are said to have " quel- ques rapports avec les chenilles dites Arpenteuses et dans le repos elles formaicnt entierement la boucle." On casting our eyes over the extensive family of the Gcometridie there are a few species which, in their larger size and in the possession of a short tail to each of the hind wings, approach more nearly to the Uraniidae than the rest. Urapteryx, with which M. Guenee commences the series of the Geometridae, forming " un assez bon passage aux Uramdes," is remarkable for the arrangement of the veins of the wings, recalling to mind that of the Saturnides, and differing from the general types of the family. Plate LXXXVI. fig. 5 represents the veins of the fore wing, and fig. 6 those of the hind wings of U. sambucaria. It is true that we here see three branches to the median vein and the lower discoidal (c3»), or the independent vein of Mr. Packard, arising from the middle of the extremity of the discoidal cell ; but both on the fore and hind wings a branch (representing the upper discoidal vein, Bo», in the fore wings) is wanting, as is also the small subcostal discoidal cell or cells. There are, however, certain moths, natives of the Malayan archipelago, which ex- hibit a much closer resemblance to the Uraniidae than Urapteryx in the arrangement of the veins of their wings, the hind pair of which are likewise furnished with a short broad tail, marked (like that of Urapteryx) with a somewhat eye-like black spot. These form the genus Strophidia of Hiibner and Felder (Micronia., group 1, H. N. Ix'p. X. p. 24), the first species of which [Micronia astheniata, from Borneo) is named by M. Guenee after my genus Atsfhenia (upon which observations will be found in the later part of this memoir). Other species are : — M. caudata. Fab. (fasciata, Cram, pi. 104. f. D) ; 31. ohtusata, Guen. pi. 5. f. 6 (errore caudata) ; M. aciileata, Guen. pi. 13. f. 8 ; il/. striataria, Lima., Clerck, pi. 55. Two very typical species have also been figured by Messrs. Felder and liogenhoft^r (Strojiliidia 2)a}inata, Novara Exp. pi. cxxviii. fig. 39, from Ilalmaheira and Salwatti, and 8. phantasmah, ib. fig. 40, from Gebeh, Java {Hern- stein)). Plate LXX^'I. fig. 8 represents the venation of the anterior, and fig. 9 tliat of the posterior wing of a typical species of this genus closely allied to S. phantasmah, whidi ' ]n Cliri/sirulia rhipheus (Pl.LXXXV. fig. 15) there is a very narrow elonp^tcd subdiscoidal cell, resulting from the abortion of the extremity of the second branch of the postcostal vein (I 2) and its coalescing with the base of the third branch (6 3), quite unlike that of any of the Geometridic. PEOF. J. 0. WESTWOOD ON THE UEAJN'IID^. 515 I received from the Leyden Museum, and which appears to be undescribed'. On com- paring the venation of this insect vpith that of the Uraniidse (e. g. sloanus &c.), it will be seen that they are so nearly identical that no doubt could be entertained of their affinity if we were assured that the larvae of the Strophklice Avere not loopers, and possessed the full complement of sixteen legs. It will, however, be remarked that M. Guenee (H. N. Lep. X. p. 24) is by no means absolutely satisfied that the Strophidice are really geometrideous, since he enters into a description of the differences which separate them from Asthenidia, Westw., which he assumes to belong to the Bombycides. In instituting this genus Asthenia^ in the volume of Exotic Moths in Jardine's ' Natu- ralist's Library,' Entom., vii. 1841, p. 209, pi. xxix. f. 1, I regarded the type, A. jjoda- liriaria, as belonging to the Geometridse, pointing out its chief distinctive characters, especially the short strongly bipectinated antennae, the very short and weak legs and body, and the venation of the wings. The latter character is here represented (Plate LXXVl. fig. 10, fore and hind wings oi A. 2)odaliriaria), whence it will be seen that, whilst differhig considerably from Uraptenjx, it approximates more closely to StropJddia, from which it, however, differs at once in wanting several of the branches of the postcostal vein of the fore wings. M. Guenee directs attention to the woolly forehead, the bipectinated antennae, the short indistinctly jointed palpi, the rudimental spiral tongue, the short woolly body, the short legs, woolly anterior tibiae and basal joint of the tarsi, the vena- tion of the wings, and especially to the fact that " tons les rameaux costaux [of the subcostal vein of the fore wings] sont retranches comme chez toutes les Saturnides," as so many characters separating Asthenidia from Strophidia, and consigning it to the Bombycides — an opinion in which I am iully prepared to acquiesce from a careful ex- amination of various Saturnideous types. Regarding, then, the relationship between Asthenia and Urapteryx as one of analogy, and not of affinity, and considering Asthenia as belonging to the great group of Bom- bycidae, and that Strophidia is more nearly allied to Asthenia than it is to Urapteryx, I conceive that we shall be warranted in placing the Uraniidae at a distance from the Geometridte and amongst the Bombycidae, on account, 1st, of the structure of the larva of Coronidia, Uranidia, and Chrysiridia, and, 2ndly, the venation of the wings destitute of a small cell. The long slender terminal joint of the palpi, and the prolongation of the hind wings into caudate appendages, appear to me to be of secondary importance in determining the relations of the group. ' The following are its short characters : — Strophidia vollenhovh, Westw. Alis albis, anticarum margine tenui antico et apicali fasciisque duabus transversis mediis pallida fuscis, posticarum fascia e medio costse ad angulum aiialem alteraque apicali pallidc fuscis, maculis duabus nigids caudalibus. Exp. alar antic, una. 2|. Hob. In ins. Malayanis (Mus. Hopeiano Oxoniie). - As the name Asthenia has been elsewhere employed in Diptera, it may be well to slightly modify it to prevent all confusion. I propose, therefore, to change the Lepidopterous name to Asthenidia. 516 PROF. .1. O. WESTW'OOD OX THE URANIID.E. 'I'lio fact that Cindart, in the ' Encyclopedie im'thodique,' described a species of Com- nidia as an Ayarixfa, that Latreille placed the two genera in jiixtaposition, and that M. Boisduval had united the three genera named by him Urania (Chri/siridia), Ci/rlimou {Uranidia), and Ni/cfalenwn {Alcidia and Lyssidia) as three of the tribes of his family Agaristidees in his ' Monographic dcs Agaristidees,' render it necessary to inquire how far this relationship is real. It is true that the shape of the antenna; in Uranidia agrees with that of Agarista, and that the armature of the four posterior tibia; is similar ; but the arrangement of the wing-veins in the two groups is wholly unlike, as may be seen by comparing my figures accompanying the present memoir witli that of Agarista lindigii given by me in the ' Transactions of the Linnean Society,' Ser. 2, Zool. vol. i. pi. xxix. fig. 24, which exhibits the small lozenge-shaped cell (occurring also in (Hhria augias, tab. cit. fig. 18, Ilespagarisfa interjecta, ibid. fig. 22), of which there is no trace in Uranidia, where the lower discoidal vein is far removed at its base from the terminal portion of the median system of veins. A more careful examination than has hitherto been published of the anangcmcnt of the veins of the wings in the chief types of the Bombycidfe discloses the fact, that there is more variation amongst them in this respect than is to be met with in other great groups, such as the Sphingidte, Noctuida;, and Geometridse, and hence that a discrepancy between the veining of the wings of the Uraniidie and the Bombycida; is not a sufficient argument for their rejection from the latter. In the accompanying Plate LXXXVI. I have given figures of a few of the leading types of Bombycidte, commencing with those in which some of the branches of the veins are obsolete, and terminating with some which have the full complement of veins and branches. It is remarkable that the gigantic types of the Bombycidae {Attacus atlas and its allies), not- withstanding the comparatively large size of the wings, should have several branches wanting ; and it is not easy to trace tlie precise analogies of some of those which remain. In this species the strong costal vein of the fore wings {a) extends about three fourths of the length of the entire costa ; the subcostal vein has apparently only three instead of five branches ; the jBrst branch (J i) arises at a short distance before the extremity of the discoidal cell, and reaches the costa halfway between the extremity of the costal vein and the tip of the wing ; the second branch {b 2) of the subcostal arises at a moderate distance beyond the cell and reaches the tip of the wing, whilst the main branch {b s) extends to the middle of the rounded hook or apex of the wing. From the underside of the subcostal vein, just beyond the branching of the first branch, extends a vein obliquely, forming a portion of the anterior margin of the glassy disk, and branching into two branches at the middle of this vitreous spot. Are these two branches the fourth and fiftli branches of the subcostal vein ■? or are they the two discoidal branches of Mr. E. Doubleday, one of which I have considered as supplemental to the subcostal series, and the other to the median series? In their position they exactly correspond to the arrangement of the veins in Morpho, as represented by Mr. Doubleday (Gen. I). PROF. J. O. WESTWOOD OX THE UEANIID.i:. 517 Lep. pi. A. fig. 3), the only difference being that in that figure we have all the five branches and the postcostal vein. In that work these two branches are rightly regarded as the two discoidal branches, whilst in Attacus, as in MorjjJio, we only find three clearly defined branches of the median vein, c i, c 2, c 3. In Attacvs j^avonia minor (Plate LXXXVI. fig. 11} we have the same small number of branches in the fore wing as in A. atlas, with the exception that the first branch of the postcostal vein (b') is so very short and slender as to be scarcely visible, arising nearly at the tip of the wing and almost immediately joining the costa; the difficulty as to the two discoidal branches (b4 = ? 35* and 35 = 1 c3») is the same as in A. atlas. In Aglaia tau (fig. 14) the same arrangement of the veins of the fore wings exists as in A. atlas. In the large long-tailed Bombycidse [Actias luna &c., Plate LXXXVI. fig. 15, fore wing, fig. 16, hind wing) we have the same arrangement of the median and two supposed discoidal veins ; but the postcostal vein has an extra fourth branch ; the first [b 1) arises at about three fourths of the length of the costal margin, and extends to its five-sixth portion, whilst the second branch {b 2) is exceedingly short and close to the tip of the wing, just as in Pawnia minor ; the third branch extends {b 3) to the tip of the wing, and is followed by a long branch {b 4), which agrees equally with the branch {b 3) in Pawnia minor ; the fifth postcostal branch is wanting, whilst the two discoidal ones (bo* and C3*) arise from a very short basal vein near the extremity of the discoidal cell. In the tailed hind wings of this group (by which they are rendered to a certain degree analogous to some of the Uraniidse) the three branches of the me- dian vein (c 1, c 2, /fo/>e/«, Westw. (Arc. Ent. i. pi. 5), founded upon certain Indian moths which have entirely the appearance of some species oi Papilio. The late Mr. Edward Double- day, to whom I applied for his opinion on the relations of this singular genus, ob- served "that it seems to partake of the characters oi Papilio, Urania, and that group of Bombyces to which B. hum belongs. The last-named species has no bridle to the wings, no maxillae ; and there is some resemblance in the neuration of the wings. But I must confess that I see no real connexion between the two insects. My impression is that it must be nearer the Uranice, some of which, in form, nearly resemble it ; but all these have maxillae and the discoidal cell of the posterior wings open, and two pairs of spines, I think, to the posterior tibia;. The one middle spine to the anterior tibiae is found in some Uranice." In Epicojfeia polydora 5 (Plate LXXXVI. fig. 18) we have the full complement of the veins of the fore wings arranged almost as in Saturnia certhia, except that the second and third postcostal branches arise from the front margin of the fourth branch, which, as well as the fifth branch, arises from the upper extremity of the discoidal cell, wliich emits the two discoidal branches and the third median branch from its truncated extremity, as in Saturnia certhia. The hind wings are very remarkable, terminating in a very broad tail, which is traversed by all the three branches of the postcostal vein. Although the relationship of Epicopeia with Urania, pointed out by Mr. Doubleday, does not appear to me so strong as it did to him, the nearer relationship of the former being, as it seems to me, towards certain of the Chalcosideous Bombycidte, it is impos- sible not to see that we have in all these insects a proof of the stronger relationship of Urania with the Bombyces than with any other of the Heterocera. It remains to notice the structure of these insects in their preparatory states, which equally supports the opinion advanced above, that the group is to be referred to the great division of the Bombyces. The transformations of Urania boisduvalii (U fernan- din(B, MacL.) are fully described by Mr. MacLeay in his memoir in the first volume of the ' Transactions ' of this Society. The larva cannot, from his account and figure. PEOF. J. O. WESTWOOD OX THE UEAJVIID^. 519 be referred either to the Hesperideous, Sphingideous, or Geometrideous divisions of the order. " Its head," says Mr. MacLeay, " is not set on the body by means of a narrow neck, as in the larvte of the true Hesperidce. It can run about as quickly as the larvae of any Bombycidse, and shows little affinity to the caterpillars of the diurnal Lepidoptera, which usually have a slow motion. In form it agrees very closely with the caterpUlar of Agarista, as figured by Lewin, but is more simple, having no hinder pro- tuberances on the penultimate segment." It, indeed, appears to me to bear a close resemblance to the larva of the bufi'-tip moth, B. lucephala, Linn. Mr. MacLeay de- scribes the cocoon of this insect as made of loose dirty yellow silk, the meshes of which were so few as to allow the inmate to be easily seen ; but his figure represents a much more solid structure. The chrysalis, which is not at all angular, moreover, is said to repose in a horizontal position — circumstances which bear upon the question whether the chrysalis is supported by a thread girt round the middle of the body, as in the butterflies with perfect fore legs, and which does not appear likely to be the case with the C/y'rtw/ff-chrysalis. The transformations of U. rhipheus were observed by M. Sganzin in Madagascar, and communicated to M. Boisduval, by whom they were published in his " Monographie des Agaristidees," in the ' Revue et Magasin de Zoologie,' 1874. On the 9 th of August " la femelle pondit un grand nombre d'oeufs blancs agglomeres ensemble et places sur les feuilles de manguier. Au bout d'une douzaine de jours les ceufs vinrent d'eclore La chenille en grossissant changeait de couleur et devenait de plus en plus noiratre. Quand elle eut quelques lignes de grandeur, on apercevait tres-distinctement de petites epines jaunatres et deux petits cornes roses retractiles ; elles les faisaient mouvoir ^ volonte et les rentraient quand on les inqui- etait le moindrement et surtout lorsqu'on les exposait a I'ombre. En grossissant mes chenilles prenaient une singuliere forme, elles s'elargissaient vers le milieu et devenaient minces aux extremites. On apercevait sur les cotes un feston a dents de loup, com- pose de plusieurs bandes regulieres de points blancs, verts et jaunes ; les cornes deve- naient d'un rose fonce, tirant sur le carmin : elles avaient dans leur marche quelques rapports avec les chenilles dites Arpenteuses, et dans le repos, elles formaient entiere- ment la boucle; cela m'a paru d'autant plus extraordinaii-e, qu'il n'y avait aucune interruption de pattes comme cela a lieu chez les Arpenteuses. La plus grande des chenilles pouvait avoir trois ponces de longueur ; toutes les autres etaient plus petites. II est possible que dans I'etat de liberte elles prennent plus d'accroissement. Lorsque les chenilles ont fait leurs chrysalides, elles se sont attachees au moyen d'un fil passe au milieu du corps ; je crois qu'elles etaient aussi attenantes par la queue. La chry- salide etait verte, conique, et un pen anguleuse, avec des bandes dorees placees hori- zontalement depuis la tete jusqu'a la queue. L'extremite etait d'un vert bien plus fence et parsemee d'un grand nombre de points dores. Les papillons sont restes 21 jours en chrysalides." Three circumstances in M. Sganzin's account merit notice, as showing differences not 4c2 520 PROF. J. O. WESTWOOD ON THE URANIID.E. mentioned by Mr. MacLeay : — 1st, the retractile rosy-coloured tentacles of the larvee ; 2ndly, its somewhat Geometriform movement; and, 3rdly, the want of a cocoon (at least no mention is made thereof by M. Sganzin), and the girt condition of the chry- salis. I am able to add descriptions and figures of the larva and pupa of a species of the genus C'oroiiidia, allied to C. orithea, which had been observed by Herr Moritz at Bogota, and to which he had applied the nam.e of C. regina. The specimens of the larva and pupa were carefully prepared, and were in the collection of Dr. Kaden, of Dresden, where 1 examined and made the drawings of them here published (PI. LXXXV. figs. 1, 2). The caterpillar has a small head, and the prothorax is smaller and thinner than the following segment. The general colour is luteous, with black spots and a black head ; on the prothorax are ten small shining points, forming an oval patch placed transversely ; the segments of the body are furnished with two small conical luteous tubercles, and on the second, sixth, and seventh segments are two erect black, slightly curved spines. The chrysalis is oval, entire, without conical protuberances ; the tongue- case is considerably elongated beyond the wing-cases ; and the extremity of the body forms an acute deflexed spine. It is enclosed in a loose open-work cocoon spun at the base of a folded leaf. The following Table combines the principal characters of the sections and genera comprising the family Uraniidse, details of which are illustrated in Plate LXXXV. Family Uraniid^, Westw., Introduction, ii. p. 3Gi) (1840). Uranides, Guenee, Sp. Gen. ix. p. 1. Cydimonii, Blanchard, II. N. Ins. ii. p. 318 ; Walker, List Brit. Mus. Lep. Ilet. p. 4. A. Fore wiugs with the fifth branch of the subcostal vein {b 5) emitting tlie upper discoidal vein [b 5 *) at a considerable distance beyond the discoidal cell. a. {Cydimon Dalm.) Palpi with the terminal joint very short. * [Cydimonidos Blanchard, Guenee.) Hind wings with the second and third branches of the median vein produced into the long tail ; second branch of the subcostal vein free. — Gen. Ur.widia, AYestw.; type U. leilus (figs. 13, 14). ** {Urania Blanchard, Gueuee.) Each of the veins of the hind wings prolonged into a tail ; second branch of the subcostal vein of the fore wing coalescing with the third branch halfway between the cell and the tip of the wing. — Gen. Chrvsiridia, Hb. ; type V. rhipheus (figs. 15, 16). b. [Nyctalemon Dahn., Nyctakmonidte Guenee.) Palpi with the terminal joint long, slender, and pointed. * Each of the veins of the hind wings produced into a short scallop, postcostal vein of fore wings wanting the 2nd branch (62). — Gen. Alcidia, "Westw.; type U. orontes (figs. 17, 18). ** Hind wings with the second and third branches of the median vein produced into a long tail. — Gen. Lyssidia, Westw.; type U. patroclus (figs. 19, 20), PEOF. J. O. WESTWOOD ON THE UEANUD^. 621 B. {Sematurida Gueuee.) Fore wings with the upper diseoidal vein [b 5 *) arising at a short dis- tance beyond the diseoidal cell, between the cell and the origin of the second branch of the subcostal vein [b 2) . a. Diseoidal cell of the hind wings terminating at a distance before the emission of the first branch of the median vein. — Gen. Manidia, Westw. ; type U. lunus (figs. 10-12). b. Diseoidal cell of the hind wings extending nearly to the emission of the third branch of the median vein. — Gen. Coronidia, Westw.; type U. orithea (figs. 1-9). Genus 1. Ukanidia, Westw. (Details, Plate LXXXV. figs. 13, 14.) Urania (pars) Fabricius, in Illig. Mag. vi. ; Hiibner, Verz. ; Latreille. Cydimon (pars ult.) Dalman (1824), Kongl. Vet. Acad. p. 392. Cydimon Guende, Felder, Blanchard, Boisduval, Rev. Zool. 1874, p. 10. Urania (pars prior). Walker, List B.M. Lap. Het. p. 4. Leilus (pars), Swainson, Zool. 111. n. ser. pi. 129. The species of this genus are remarkable for the habit of migrating in large numbers, as described by Mr. MacLeay in his paper in the Society's 'Transactions.' Such flights of U. leilus are also described in ' Nature,' iv. pp. 12, 13, 494 ; and the annual migrations of TJ. fulgens from east to west in August and September, across the Isthmus of Panama, are described in the same journal (' Nature,' viii. p. 536). Sp. 1. Ukanidia leilus. Papilio leilus, Linn. S. N. ii. "50; Clerck, Icon. pi. 27. f. 1 ; Cramer, Pap. Exot. i. pi. 85. f. C, D; Fabricius, Syst. Gloss. {Urania, L.) ; Guenee, Sp. Gen. ix. p. 7; Boisduval, Rev. Zool. 1874, p. 10 [Cydimon, L.). Lars heroica leilaria, Hiibner, Samml. ex. Schm. [L. B. heroica), pi. a. f. 1, 2. Leilus surinamensis , Swainson, Zool. HI. 2nd ser. pi. 125. Hah. Cayenne, Surinam. Sp. 2. Uranidia amphielus. Cydemon amphielus, Boisduval, Rev. Zool. 1874, p. ] 1. Cydimon leilus, var., Guenee, Sp. Gen. ix. p. 7. Hub. Trinidad. Sp. 3. Ur.\nidia brasiliensis. Leilus brasiliensis, Swainson, Zool. 111. 2nd ser. pi. 126; Gueuee, Sp. Gen. ix. p. 7, pi. 1. f. 1. Hah. Brazil. Sp. 4. Uranidia caci(;a. Cydimon cacica, Guenee, Sp. Gen. ix. p. 8; Boisduval, Rev. Zool. 1874, p. 11. Hah. Mexico, Acapulco. 522 PROF. J. O. WESTWOOD OX TKE UEANIID.E. Sp. 5, Uraxidia poevi. Urania poeyi, Herrich-Schaffer, Corr. zool. Ver. Regeusburg, xx. 1868 (p. 43, Lep.) ; Felder, Novara, Lep. V. pi. cxxi. figs. 6, 7. Hab. Cuba. Sp. 6. UUAXIDIA BOISDUVALII. Urania boisduvalii, Guerin, Icon. R. An. p. 490, Ins. pi. 82. f. 1 ; Griffith, An. Kingd. Ins. pi. 99 ; Guenee, Sp. Gen. ix. p. 8; Boisduval, Rev. Zool. 1874, p. 12. Urania fernanditue, ^MacLeay, Trans. Zool. Soc. i. 1834, p. 180, pi. 26. Hab. Cuba. Sp. 7. Uraxidia fl'lgens. Urania fulgens, Boisduval, MSS.; Walker, List B.M. Lep. Het. p. 5 ; Guenee, Sp. Gen. ix. p. 9; Boisduval, Rev. Zool. 1874, p. 16, Lepid. Guatemala, p. 77. Hab. Columbia, Guatemala, Mexico. Sp. 8. UEANiniA sloaxus. Papilio sloanus, Cramer, Pap. Exot. i. pi. 85. figs. E, F; Sloane, Jamaica, ii. pi. 239. f. 11, 12 ; Godart, Enc. M. ix. p. 709 {Urania, S.) ; Guenee, Sp. Gen. ix. p. 9 ; Boisduval, Rev. Zool. 1874, p. 15. Papilio leilus, var. /3, Gmelin, i. pp. 5, 2, 237 ; Fabricius, Ent. Syst. iii. p. 122. Urania sloanaria, Hvibncr, Verz. p. 289. Leilus occidentalis, Swainson, Zool. 111. 2nd ser. pi. 129. Hab. Jamaica. Genus 2. Chrysiridia, Dalm. (Details, Plate LXXXV. figs. 15, 16.) Chrysiridia, Hiibner (Verz.). Urania, Boisduval, Rev. Zool. 1874, p. 7 ; Guenee, Sp. Gen. ix. p. 11'. Urania (pars ult.). Walker, List B. M. Lep. Het. p. 4. Cydlmon (pars prima), Dabn. 1825. Thaliura, Dimcan in Jardine, Nat. Lib. Lep. p. 195 (1837). Leilus (pars), Swainson, Zool. III. n. ser. pi. 130. Rhipheus, Swainson, Zool. lU. u. ser. pi. 131. Sp. 1 (9). Chrysiridia rhipueus. Papilio rhipheus, Drury, ii. pi. 23. f. 1, 2, Index, col. 2 ; Cramer, Pap. Exot. iv. pi. 385. f . A, B ; Godart, Enc. M. ix. p. 709 {Urania rh.) ; Boisduval, Faune Ent. Madagascar, Lep., pi. 14. f. 1, 2, and Rev. Zool. 1874, p. 8 ; Crochard's edit. R. An. Atlas Ins. pi. 144. f. 3 ; Guenee, Sp. Gen. ix. p. 12. Urania prometheus, Drapiez, Diet. Class. d'Hist. Nat. iii. pi. 8. f. 1, 2, Leilus orientalis, Swainson, Zool. 111. 2nd ser. pi. 130. ' Fabricius does not mention U. rhiplieus amongst his types of Urania. PEOr. J. O. "WESTWOOD ON THE UEANIID^. 523 Rhipheus dasycephalus, Swainson, op. cit. pi. 131. Urania druryi, Boisduval, Rev. Zool. 1874, p. 8. Urania rhipheus, var., Guenee, Sp. Gen. ix. p. 12. Chrysiridia riphearia, Hiibner, Verz. p. 289. Urania madagascariensis, Lesson, Illustr. d. Zool. pi. xxxiii. Hah. Madagascar; China"? (Z'ra/'y'); BengaU (Crawer) ; CoromandeU ; St. Helena 1 {Bory de St. Vincent). I am quite satisfied that the figure given by Drury was taken from a specimen which had the hind wings mutilated, and the head replaced by that of a Papilio. Drury gave China as the locality of his specimen, which is also clearly erroneous ; but whether the specimen had been brought from Madagascar or from some part of the eastern coast of Africa is uncertain. In the latter case his insect may be geographically distinct from the Madagascar individuals ; and this would enable us to account for the variations in the markings of the wings pointed out by Swainson, Guenee, and Boisduval. Until, however, we receive individuals agreeing with Drury 's figure, I should be inclined to think that the variations pointed out resulted from the evidently imperfect and partially rubbed condition of Drury's insect. According to M. Sganzin, who captured numbers of C. rhipheus in Madagascar, the small neighbouring island of Sainte-Marie possesses a smaller species, thus noticed by him in his communication to M. Boisduval : — " II existe aussi une petite espece que je crois tres-differente de la premiere ( U. rhipheus). On ne I'a pas rencontre a la meme epoque, et je ne crois pas qu'on la trouve a la grande terre ; je ne I'ai jamais vue qu'a Sainte-Marie; elle parait en mars et avril," the true U. rhipheus appearing in the winged state in September. Sp. 2 (10). Chrysiridia macleayii. Urania macleayii, Montrouzier, Ann. Sci. Phys. et Nat. Lyon, ser. 2, viii. p. 410. Hob. Woodlark Island. Sp. 31 (111)- Chrysiridia crcesus. Thaliura cratsws, Gerstaecker, in Ai-chiv f. Naturg. xxxvii. p. 361, and V. d. Decken, Reisen in Ost-Afrika, Ins. p. 383, tab. xvi. f. 4. " A Thai, rhipheo, Cr., diflfert alarum anticarum fascia media smaragdina latiore, mar- ginem externum versus furcatim divisa, strigis dimidii apicalis densioribus, posticarum area smaragdina et igneo-cuprea uberius nigro conspersa et fasciata, appendiculis 3 posticis brevioribus, alls anticis infra ubique subsequaliter midi-undulatis, posticarum area basali obscurius cseruleo-viridi." Exp. alar. mill. 78 s, 92 2 . Hah. Ins. Zanzibar. I examined specimens of this supposed species in the hands of M. Deyrolle in Paris, On the supposed Asiatic locality of this species see Trimen Linn. Soc. Zool. xi. p. 284. 524 PEOF. ,T. O. WESTWOOD OX THE URAXIID^. which did not, however, appear to me to be specifically distinct from C. 7'hipheus. Such is also tlie opinion of M. Lucas, who states that all the transitional forms occur be- tween U. rhipheus and U. crasus. Bull. Soc. Ent. Fr. [5] vi. pp. cxxvii, cxxviii. Genus 3. Alcidia, ^^'estw. (DetaUs, Plate LXXXV. figs. 17, 18.) Alcidis, Hubuer (Vcrz. 1816) ; Guen^c, Sp. Gen. ix. p. 13 (nee Alddes, Dahn. 1826, Gen. Curcul.). Nyctalemon (pars prior), Dalman, Walker, List B.M. Lep. Het. i. p. 7; Boisduval, Rev. Zool. 1874, p. 17. Sp. 1 (12). Alcidia oroxtes. Papilio orontes, Linn. Syst. Nat. ii. p. 750; Clerek, Icon. pi. 26. f. 1 ; Cramer, Pap. E.\ot. i. pi. 83. figs. A, B; Godart, Enc. M. ix. p. 710 [Urania o.) ; Hopffcr, Ncue Schm. Heft 2, tab. 11, figs. 1, 2. Alcidis orontiaria, Hiibner, Samml. exot. Schm., Lar., B. her. 3, f. 3, l. Uab. Amboina, Ceram, Gilolo, New Guinea, Cape Grafton, north-east coast of New Holland. Sp. 2 (13). Alcidia liris. Alcidis liris, Fclder, Wiener ent. Monatschr. Bd. iv. p. 250 ; llcise d. Novara, Lep. pi. cxxi. fig. 2. Hab. Batchian {Wallace). Sp. 3 (14). Alcidia arnus. Alcidis arnus, Felder, Reise d. Novara, Lep. pi. cxxi. fig. 1 . Hab. Insula Aru^ (Lorqttin). In Mus. Brit. &c. Sp. 4 (15). Alcidia cydnus. Nyctalemon cydnus, Felder, in Wiener ent. Monatsch. iii. pi. 3. f. 1, p. 179. Var. AVith band of hind wings very broad, extending nearly to the anal angle (Aru). An y. metaurus, Hopff". ? Hab. Dorey, New Guinea (Mus. Brit.); Polynesia'? (Felder). Sp. 5 (16). Alcidia zodaic.\. Nyctalemon zodaica, Butler, in Entom. M. Mag. vol. v. p. 273. "^2. Alse supra nigrse, ad basin virescentes, fascia media commuui lata aureo-viridi ; anticse fascia altera lineolari subapicali, pallidiore striolisque costalibus ad basin aureo- albidis ; posticce cauda cajruleo-alba, ciliis albis ; macula squamisque submarginalibus analibus, corpus virescens abdomine pallidiori. Alge subtus pallide virescentes, fasciis fere velut in K. orontiaria, Hiibner {orontes, Linn.), maculis autcm posticis subapica libus in margine subrotundatis viridibus ; corpus thorace albido, abdomine aurantiaco, cirris maris perlongis ochreis. Expans. alar. una. 4, lin. 7." PEOF. J. O. WESTWOOD ON THE UEANIID^. 525 Except in being more bronzed in the colour of the wings, this species scarcely differs from A. agathyrsus. Hah. North China {Fortune). In Brit. Mus. Sp. 6 (17). Alcidia agathtrsus. Nyctalemon agathyrsus, Kirsch, Mittheil. zool. Mus. Dresden, Heft ii. p. 129, pi. vii. figs. 8, 8a. Hub. New Guinea. In Mus. Dresden. Sp. 7 (18). Alcidia boops, sp. nov. (Plate LXXXVII. fig. 1.) Alls supra cyaneo-nigris, anticarum dimidio basali costse striolis, fascia submedia postice intus incurva, fasciolaque subapicali cseruleo-viridibus ; posticis fascia media dilatata ejusdem coloris, cauda caeruleo-alba, ciliis albis. Capite maximo, ano maris fulvo bar- bate. Expans. alar, antic, unc. 4f . Hab. Aru (Wallace). In Mus. Hopeiano Oxonise. This insect agrees so entirely with A. agathyrsus that I should have had no hesitation in so naming it ; but the extraordinary size of the head and eyes, far exceeding those of any other males of the genus which I have examined, seems a sufficient character to allow it a distinctive specific rank, although I am aware that in certain insects which are distinguished by the large size of their heads there is much difierence in the extent of this character. I know no such instance, however, amongst Lepidopterous insects. Sp. 8 (19). Alcidia metaurus. (Plate LXXXVII. fig. 2.) Nyctalemon metaurus, HopfFer, Neue od. wen. bek. Schmett. 11. Heft, pi. 2. figs. 3, 4; Boisduval, Rev. Zool. 1874, p. 18. Alcides orontes, Guenee, Sp. Gen. ix. p. 14. Note. — The figure given by Hopffer is far too highly coloured. I have therefore given a new representation of it. It may be distinguished by the very broad conical central fascia of the fore wings. Hab. New Guinea and north of Australasia. In Mus. Hop. Oxoni^, Sp. 9 (20). Alcidia aurora. Alcides aurora, Salvin & Godman, Proc. Zool. Soc. 1877, p. 150, pi. xxiii. figs. 5, 6 Hab. New Ireland, Duke-of-York Island. In Brit. Mus. Genus 4. Lyssidia, Westw. (Details, Plate LXXXV. figs. 19, 20.) Lyssa, Hiibner (Verz. 1816), nee Lissa, Leach, Gen. Crust. (1815). Nyctalemon, pars ult., Dalman, Boisduval, Rev. Zool. 1874, p. 16. VOL. X. — PART. XII. No. 4. — June 1st, 1879. 4d 526 PEOF. J. 0. WESTWOOD ON THE UKANIIDJE. Nyctalemon, pars mcd., Walker, List B.M. Lep. Ilet. p. 7. Nyctalemon, Gueuee, Sp. Gen. ix. p 14. Sp. 1 (21). Ltssidia patroclus. Papilio patroclus, Linn. Mus. Reg. 204; Syst. Nat. ii. 749; Clcrck, Icon. pi. 37. fig. 1 ; God.Enc. M. ix. 710; {Urania p.) Guenee, Sp. Gen. ix. p. 15. Lyssa patroclaria, Hiibner, "N'erz. p. 289. Note. — The fascia of the fore wing is broader, white, and extends nearly to the anal angle of the fore wing. Hab. Amboina, Sylhet, Java, Duke-of-York Island. Sp. 2 (22). Lyssidia mex(etius. Papilio patroclus, Cramer, Pap. pi. 109. figs. A, B ; Drury, Ins. i. pi. 7, 8 ; Guenee, Sp. Gen. ix. p. 15 (Nyctal.patr.), nee Linn., Clerck. Nyctalemon menoetius, Hopffer, Neue od. wen. bek. Sehmett. 11. Heft, pi. 3. fig. 1 (1856) ; Boisduval, Rev. Zool. 1874, p. 20. Nyctalemon zampa, Butler, Ent. M. Mag. vol. v. p. 273 (1869). Nyctalemon crameri, Boisduval, Rev. Zool. 1874, p. 19. Lyssa achillaria, Hiibner, Verz. p. 289. Nyctalemon achillaria. Guenee, Sp. Gen. ix. p. 15. Papilio patroclus, var., Cramer, Pap. pi. 198. figs. A, B. Note. — The fascia is narrow, white, and does not reach near to the anal angle of the fore wings. Hah. China, India, Singapore. Sp. 3 (23). Ltssidia hectoe. Nyctalemon hector, White, !MS.; Walker, List Brit.-Mus. Lep. Het. vii. p. 1771. Nyctalemon lonyicaudus, Sehauff. Nuuq. Otios. i. p. 13 (Manilla). L. fusculo-cinerea, alis anticis posticisque fascia recta obliqua alba ; alis anticis margine basali nigro, albo subundulato ; alis posticis ad apicem externum nigro plagiatis vel subfasciatis. Ilab. Boraeo and Philippine Islands. In Mus. Brit. Smaller than N. patroclus, inner tail of hind wings proportionally longer. Sp. 4 (24). Lyssidia najabula. Nyctalemon najabula, F. Moore^ Proc. Zool. Soc. 1877, p. 620. Hah. Andaman Islands. In Mus. Brit. Smaller and of a much darker fuliginous-brown colour both above and below than the Indian L. mencetius and the Malayan L. docilis, and has a narrower median trans- PEOF. J. O. WESTWOOD ON THE UEANIID^. 527 verse pale band on both wings above than the former species ; and on the underside these bands are well defined and narrow. Expanse 5 inches. S. Andaraans (Port Blair). In Coll. F. Moore. Sp. 5 (25). Ltssidia docilis. Nyctalemon docile, Butler, Journ. Linn. Soc. (Zool.) xiii. p. 197 ; Druce, P. Z. S. 1878, p. 642. Hab. Malacca. In Mus. Brit. Genus 5. Manidia, Westw. (Details, Plate LXXXV. figs. 10-12.) Mania, Hiibner (Verz.). Sematura, Dalman, Act. Holm. 1824, p. 407; Guenee, Sp. Gen. ix. p. 17. Nyctalemon, pars ult.. Walker, List B. M. Lep. Het. p. 8. , Guenee, H. N. Lep. ix. Sp. 1 (26). Manidia lunus. Phalmna lunus, Linn. Syst. Nat. ii. 810 ; Clerck, Icon. pi. 52. figs. 3, 4 ; Godart, Enc. Meth. ix. 71 1. Sematura actaon, Felder, Novara, pi. cxxi. fig. 5 (=" Lunvs Clerck," Felder, in text). Foem. ? Papilio empedocles (Fabricius, Mant. Ins. ii. 10?), Cramer, Pap. Exot. iii. pi. 199. figs. A, B ; Godart. Enc. Meth. ix. 711 ; {Uratiia emp.) Guenee, Sp. Gen. ix. p. 19. Mania empedoclaria, Hiibner, Verz. p. 290; Samml. exot. Schm. Lar., B. her. B, f. 314. Hab. Brasilia, Honduras. 2[ote. — Cramer's figures B, C, plate 220, named cunigcraria by Hiibner, Verz. p. 290, have been referred to this species; but 'they represent a dift'erent insect, having undu- lating, not straight, fascise on the wings. Sp. 2 (27). Manidia selene. Sematura selene, Guenee, Sp. Gen. ix. p. 18; an Nyct. agistus, Wlk.? Hab. Para. Sp. 3 (28). Manidia diana. Sematura diana, Guenee, Sp. G^n. ix. p. 18. Hab. ? Sp. 4 (29). Manidia ph(ebe. Sematura phabe, Guenee, Sp. Gen. ix. p. 19, Aim. Soc. Ent. France (5), v. pp. 117, 118 ( $). Bab. 1 Sp. 5 (30). Manidia caudilunaria. Papilio lunus 2 , Cramer, Pap. pi. 200. fig. A. Sematura caudilunaria, Hiibner, Verz. p. 290. 4d 2 528 PROF. J. O. WEST WOOD ON THE URANIIDiE. Semaiura pht •vf ;?■• '^ ^ .^.:S" 4>?- X ^'^^K <^l ^^^^ti€^^:' i??^4 Mi^t? c^^ ^:^-/^ ^..^■^\r\M;^ :*r .*- ^ . %- <-.;>• ^( .^^ -^ ?v- .