30 ^ !> :)3> }>y €>3 ^3 ^3> 3 :i j.> /3 »>">> 3>>);ji>>:3)^>&>>>) ^^:^3lx» 'f '=> ^ ^Srv> J> ■)) -^'HryWi'yij^:^ ^ m 55 SL i>3 »32» J JH-to Z>5 J::s>yX?i ^ Q'^s>3srt> mf> &iX>P.'->3)i3 .i>!j> 2):!) i>» : ; T ^ ^^^^ 3 jy^ ^m Your Laboratory s^ a Is it supplied with the latest and most usable appar= atus, and are you drawing your supplies from the most available source? Send us a trial order and notice the difference. ^ j* ^ a^ *. jk Ji '^^L^r^3 Scientific Materials Company MAKERS - = - IMPORTERS 7111^ Penn Ave. Pittsburgh, Pa. The Ohio ^hi^aturalisty PUBLISHED BY The Biological Club of the Ohio State Uni'versiiy, Volume IV. NOVEMBER, 1903. No. 1. TABLE OF CONTENTS HiNE— On the Life History of Tabanus Vivax 1 PoiNDEXTEii— The Development of the Spikelet and Grain of Corn 3 OSBORN— Note on Tinobregmus vittatus Van Ditzee 9 Griggs— Notes on Interesting oliio AVillows 11 SCHAFFNER— Poisonous and Other Injurious Plants of Ohio 16 Kei.lekman— Minor Plant Notes, No. 5 20 OsBoRN— Note on Aradus ornatus Say 22 ScHAFFNEii -The Maximiun Height of Plants. V 23 News and Notes 23 Griggs— Meeting of the Biological Club 24 ON THE LIFE HISTORY OF TABANUS VIVAX. James S. Hine. Eggs. — Deposited in masses composed of several hundreds, on stones that project above the water in riffles. Mass nearly round in outline, onh- slightly convex, composed of about three la3'ers one above the other. Color of the whole ma.ss brown, mottled over the top with whitish. Female observed ovipositing June eighth. lyARVA. — In September and October of various years, when the Avater was low, I have taken a number of larvae among stones and rubbish in riffles. Sometimes they are taken in nets used for collecting Corydalis larvae, and like them appear to be at home in the swiftest part of the the stream ; in this respect differing from most tabanid larvae with which I am acquainted. I^arvae taken late in the fall and kept in wet earth and fed on angle- worms or other animal food pass through their transformations and reach the adult stage in late spring or early summer. Since I have never come across these larvae in nature in spring their exact habits at this time of year are not known, but suppose they leave the water and pupate in the earth near at hand. General color yellowish white, anterior margin of each thoracic segment and a narrow band including the prolegs on the anterior half of the first seven abdominal segments opaque and appearing darker than the other parts, which are more or less shining and usually finely striate longitudinally. Prothoracic segment divided by longitudinal grooves into four nearly equal parts, which may be called the dorsal, ventral and lateral areas. The lateral areas are shining and finely striated on posterior third and opaque on anterior two thirds : the dorsal and ventral areas are opaque on about anterior fourth and distinctly shining on the remaining 2 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 1, parts. The ventral space is quite evidently divided into two equal parts by a longitudinal grove. In order to see the characters of this segment it nuist be fully extended. The mesothoracic and metathoracic segments have a number of longitudinal grooves, some of which are very narrowl}' bordered by opaque darker col- oring, which proceeds backward from the narrow anterior border of these segments. Each of the first seven abdominal segments has on its anterior part a transverse row of eight tubercles which encircles the segment. These all bear spines or claws at the apexes, excepting a dorsal pair on each of the first three or four segments. They may be called prolegs, since they have the parts necessary to such organs. On the posterior dorsal border of most of the abdominal segments there may be a narrow, irregular, opaque marking of the same color of the narrow band in the region of the prolegs; eighth segment on each side with two nar- row, curved markings, which have the appearance of being com- posed of contiguous punctures. These markings are of the same shade of color as the other darker areas, and the lower one is more than twice as long as the upper. Length, 20 millimeters. The size of these larvae is rather diffi- cult to give, since a specimen fully extended is longer than at other times. Pupa. — lycngth 18, diameter 4 millimeters. lyight brown in color, thorax somewhat paler than the abdomen. Antennal and other tubercles of the head and thorax prominent and darker than the surrounding parts. Prothoracic spiracular tubercle slightly elevated, reniform, oblique ; rima uniformly curved for nearly its whole length, but just before the anterior end the curvature is stronger but no hook is formed. First abdominal spiracle nearly round ; rima nearly uniformly curved, posteriorly very slightly widened just at the end, anteriorly slightly narrowed and curved so as to form a short hook. The other abdominal spiracles agree with the first one in general, but there appears to be slight varia- tion in the enlargement and curvature of the extreme ends. Ter- minal teeth prominent, shining brown in color, darkest at the extreme tips. Dorsal pair of teeth smallest and closer together than the ventral, lateral teeth longer and larger than the ventral and located much beneath the dorsal, in fact they are uearl}- mid- way between the dorsal and ventral. I have never found the adults of this species especially com- mon, neither have I observed that they molest stock. The male has been procured fully as often as the female on protruding stones in swift-flowing streams, and in sunny spots in woods near such streams. Most of the specimens in my collection were taken during the first half of Jmie. All the stages of this fly have been procured from the Scioto- River in the vicinity of Jones' Dam, near Columbus. Nov., 1903.] The Development of Corn. 3 THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SPIKELET AND GRAIN OF CORN.'^ C. C. POINDEXTER. With a view to a later study of the subject of xenia in corn, a preHminary observation of the development of the carpel and endosperm was attempted in order to see what relation exists between them, since some of the authorities mentioned claim that the effect of double fertilization is shown in the carpel wall, while others assert that it is shown only in the endosperm and embryo- sac. The embrj^ology of the corn grain also was studied and figures were made of the ovule at different stages beginning with the archesporial cell and ending with the fully developed embryo. These drawings and observations not being complete will be reserved for another paper. As there are few recent descriptions and figures of the develor ment of the spikelet and grain, it was thought advisable to publish this general part at the present time. The writer wishes to acknowledge his indebtedness to Professor John H. Schaffner for invaluable suggestions and criticisms in the preparation of the paper. The material used was common white field corn gathered at different stages of maturity from the corn field of the Ohio State Universit}- in the summer of 1902. The very 3-oung ears were left whole or cut in two, while the larger were quartered length- wise and, after killing, cut into pieces convenient for use. The material was killed in chrom -acetic acid and preserved in 70 per cent alcohol and later imbedded in parafiin. Pieces of the younger ears were cut from three to six grains in length, while single grains were used of the older stages. The sections were cut 12-18 /A in thickness, and stained on the slide in anilin-safranni and gentian-violet and iron-alum-haematoxylin. All things con- sidered, corn is an easy object to work with, but in using the older grains precaution should be taken to guard against shrinkage of the endosperm tissue. This may be practically obviated by punc- turing the grain with a dissecting needle before killing. The outer covering of these grains may also be sliced off on either side to permit of rapid penetration. The iron-alum-haematoxalyn proved to be the most efficient stain and was soon the only one used. The production and development of new varieties of plants depends upon the fact that the offspring of a cross par- takes of the characters of both parents, which, according to Men- del (i) follows a definite law of proportion in some species. Some plants appear to be more susceptible to hybridizing than ••■ Coutributions from the Botanical Laboratory of Ohio State University. XIV. 4 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 1, others, and the first offspring shows the characters of the starain- ate parent in a marked degree, especially in the character of seeds and frnits. This immediate, or direct effect of pollen upon the character of seeds and fruits Focke, (5) has termed xenia, a phe- nomenon which has long been more or less puzzling to botanists and plant breeders. Just how such an effect was brought about was not definitely understood, and it is onl)- a few years since that any phenomenon has been known which could be called upon for a reasonable solution of the problem and that a tentative expla- nation has been offered. In 1898 Nawaschin (10) reported the process of double fertilization in Lilium martagon and Fritillaria tenella. Guignard (6) soon followed with a full description of the process, adding figures of the more interesting phases, and claimed that the process was not peculiar to the Liliaceae but very general in the Phanerogams. In corroboration of this author's statement, the process has been observed in many plants by a number of investigators. The corn plant, however, is the one among the many observed in which the process of xenia is well established and belief in the phenomenon seems to rest mainly upon its constant occurrence in this plant. Vilmorin (12) ob-served xenia in corn as earh- as 1866. Hildebrandt also report- ed it the following 3-ear and in 1872 Koernicke (8) made a similar report. These authors used seeds that were pure so far as known. Some j-ears later American botanists took up the subject for investigation. Sturtevant in 1883 made the first report. Burrill reported the process in 1887; Kellerman and Swingle in 1S88, and McCluer in 1892. But some doubt attaches to their findings because the seeds used were not known to be pure. Moreover, the process was apparently contrary to certain well-established laws of repro- duction and embryology, errors could easily have been made in conducting the experiments; and until some explanation could be given for the phenomenon, botanists looked upon the matter with some suspicion. The explanation was left to DeVries (3). In a recent preliminary article ' ' On the hybrid fecundation of the Albumen," he suggests the act of double fertilization as explana- tory of the phenomenon of xenia ; and although as late as 1900 no detailed researches on the embryology of corn or any of the cereals or gras.ses had been made, nor any direct observations that were conclusive that double fertilization occurred in corn, Webber (13), holding the same opinion as DeVries (3), proceed to con- duct some experiments on the subject. His seed corn was pure so far as known, and the results, published in 1900, elicited his conclusion "that xenia does occur in maize, whatever its interpretation may be." Correns (2) about the same time reported observations practicall)- similar to tliose of Dc Vries. The following year Guignard (7) removed all doubt of the occur- rence of double fertilization in corn by his publication of a paper Nov., 1903.] The Development of Corn. 5 on " La Double Fecondation Dans Le Mais." It is much regret- ted that this author produced no drawings with his excellent paper. The ovulary of the maize has been defined by Guignard (7) as being constituted of a single carpellary leaf turning its ventral suture from the side of the axis of the ear. In the very young spikelet (Fig. i) the incipient carpel appears in longitudinal sec- tion as two rounded protruberances, due to a depression in the top. The carpel wall begins to develop rapidly on one side, and immediately begins to develop the young silk, or style (Fig. 2). The inner empty glume at this stage is quite prominent and a rudimentary flower appears on the side away from the axis of the ear. The grain grows rapidly from the beginning and the style and ovule soon become more distinct. The silk elongates (Fig. 3), and the carpel begins to close, while at the same time the integuments make their appearance, the inner one developing more rapidly than the outer one. At this stage the archesporial cell is becoming prominent. A little later (Fig. 4), the floral organs pecome perfectl}' distinct and the integuments diverge, the inner one inclining toward the ovule and the outer one point- ing toward the opening of the carpel. When the carpel wall closes, there is left a small prominence at its summit. A double funnel effect is produced as the walls close up around this open- ing, the bowls of the funnel arising at the two extremeties (Fig. 5). Guignard (7 ) terms this opening the " stylar canal." Later on this canal closes up completely at the lower extremity, but the funnel effect at the top persists throughout (Fig. 10). " It is at the base and upon the inner side of the protuberance," says Guig- nard (7), " that is to say, on the side of the axis of the ear, that the long style of the flower is inserted; the style does not occup}', theti, as one might believe at first glance, the organic summit of the ovary." The writer's observations, as shown by the figures, agree with this statement. In this connection it might be well to call attention to the carpel of Typha as described by Schaft'ner (ri). The development of the carpel and style of this plant appears to be quite similar to that of the coru. The writer saw the pollen tube after fertilization had taken place, but in all the study failed to see its entrance into the canal, through which one might expect it to pass. According to Guignard (7 ) the tube probably passes through the canal, although he does not state that he actually observed it. He describes its course in the fol- lowing terms : "Arrived at the base of the style, the pollen tubes must evidently direct themselves toward the ovarian prominence in order to enter it and to follow the course of the canal which conducts then into the cavity of the ovary." When the 8-celled embr^'o-sac appears (Fig. 5) the nucellus has not greatly enlarged. The semi-anatrophus ovule occupies the base of the cavity of the 6 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 1, ovulary. The tip of the nucellus emerges slightly between the integuments, the inner of which extends entirely around the ovvile, while the short outer integument does not go be3-ond the middle of the ovule. Just at the base of the stylar canal the outer integument, rising freely from the inner one, bends itself abruptly upward as if to form a stopper to the cavity of the ovulary which at this place is quite large. Guignard (7) says that this upward bending accounts for the shortness of the the outer integument, and also states that the inner integument became thicker where it was not covered by the outer; but the writer saw but little dif- ference in the thickness and if any, the reverse was true. Imme- diatel}^ after fertilization development of the nucellus is very rapid (Fig. 6) so that at that stage of the ovule the embr3'0-sac occu- pies only a verj- small portion of the entire bod3^ Endosperm also begins to develop, spreading upward and backward from the 3'oung embryo. When the nucellus has about completed its development the endosperm takes on a rapid growth, destroying the large mass of nucellar tissue. Simultaneous with this growth, the embryo also develops with rapidit3', evidenth' being well nourished b3' the large endosperm cells (Fig. 8). This growth continues until the endosperm entireh' replaces the nucellar tissue, leaving only a vestige of the latter surrounding it (Figs. 9-11). The 3'oung embr3'0, protected b3' the scutellum, lies on the ventral side of the grain, somewhat above the base of the endro- sperm and outside of it, except for a ver3- thin layer one or two cells in thickness. It is shielded on the outside 133- the remaining nucellar tissue and the carpel wall (Figs. 9-10). In Figure 11 is .shown a nearl3' mature grain cut in longitudinal section transverse to the ear. The remains of the nucellus is verv thin or entirely absent. A little above the base of the grain is the 3'oung embr3'0, showing the plumule and the .scutellum, below which the large suspensor extends with its end surrounded with elongated endosperm cells. Across the upper end of the grain is shown a strip of endosperm with larger and quite irregu- lar cells. There are sixt3' or more cells acro.ss the entire width, the cells being comparatively minute in comparison to tlie size of the grain and not large as is usually figured in the text-books. HIBLIOGRAl'HY. 1. Bati-;son, W. Mendel '.s Principles of Heredity. Pp. 40-103. 1902. 2. CoRRKNS, C. Unterscuhungen ueber die Xenien lici Zea nia3-s. Ber. d. dent. P>ot. Gesellsch. 17:410-417. i^>99- 3. Dk Vriks, Hur.o. Sur la Fecondation hybride de I'alhunKn. Comptes rendns .\cad. des So. 4 Dec. 1S99. 4. . Sur la Fecondation hybride de I'endosperin dans le Mais. Revue gen. de Bot. 15 April 1900. 5. P'OCKE, W. O. Die Pflanzen Mischlinge. p. 511. 1S81. Nov., 1903.] The Development of Corn. 7 6. GuiGNARD, L. Sur les antherozo'ides et la double copulation sexuelle chez les vegetaux angiospermes. Comptes rendus. 128 : 869. April 1899. 7. . La double fecondation dans le Mais. Journ. d. Bot. 15 : 1-14. No. 2. 1901. 8. KoERNiCKE, Frtedr. Vorlanfige Mittheilungen ueber den Mais. Sitzungsberichte d. niederrheinischen Gesellsch. f. Nat. w, Heil- kunde'in Bonn. Pp. 63-76. 1872. 9. Nawaschin, S. Ueber die Befruclitungsforgange bei einigen Dicoty- ledoneen. Ber. d. Deut. Bot. Gesellsch. 18 : 224-230. 1900. 10. . Resultate einer Revision des Befruchtungsvorgangs bei Lilium martagon und Fritillaria tenella. Bui. d. I'Acad. Imp. d. Sciences de Str Petersbourg, T. 9, No. 4. 189S. Also Botanisches Centralblatt. 77 : 62. 1899. 11. SCHAFFNER, JOHN H. The Development of the Stamens and Carpels of Typha Latifolia. Bot. Gaz. 24 : 93-102. 1897. 12. ViLMORiN, Henry L. de. Bui. de la Soc. Bot. de France. 14 : 246. Seance du 29 Nov. 1S67. 12. Webber, Herbert. Xenia, or the Immediate Effect of Pollen in Maize. Bull. 22, U. S. Dept. Agr. Div. PI. Phys. & Path. 1900. KXPLANATION OF PLATES I AND II. All figures originally magnified 75 diameters, except figures 8 and 9, which are magnified 190 and 30 diameters respectively. Figures were drawn under the camera with Bausch & Lomb microscope, and subsequently reduced to about Ve diameter. In the figures, S indicates style (silk) ; C, the stylar canal ; I, inner glume ; O, outer glume. Fig. I. Very young spikelet showing incipient carpel. Spikelet with young carpel, showing first definite appearance of st5de and ovule. Spikelet with style elongated ; ovule showing archesporial cell and first appearance of integuments. Spikelet m which the carpel is nearly closed, leaving only a small pore into the ovulary. Spikelet with ovule containing S-celled embryosac. Spikelet with ovule after fertilization and the development of considerable endosperm, showing decided enlargement of the nucellus. Carpel still further developed, showing great increase in nucellar tissue with only slight increase of endosperm. Endosperm and embryo same as Fig. 7. Grain with large embryo, showing great development of endo- sperm and the remains of the nucellus. Fig. 10. Nearly mature grain, showing relation of carpel wall, integuments, endosperm and embryo. Endosperm somewhat shrunken. Fig. II. Nearly mature grain, showing section of embryo and comparative size of endosperm cells. Fig. 2 Fig. 3 Fig. 4- Fig- 5- Fig. 6. Fig. 7- Fig. 8. Fig. 9- 8 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 1, Ohio Naturalist. F/afc L PoixnEXTKR on "Corn." Nov., 1903.] Note on Tiiwbregmus vittatus. Ohio Nati'ralist. PMi- II. PoiNDEXTER on "Corn. NOTE ON TINOBREGMUS VITTATUS (Van Duzee). Herbert Osborn. Tinobre^imis vittatus was described by Van Duzee in 1894 from two specimens collected in Florida, females only being represent- ed. Since then no further record of the species has been made and the male has remained unknown. The species is an extremely interesting one, possessing a number of unique characters, and remains still the only species known to the genus which was erected by Van Duzee for its reception. As I can now give two additional records and a description of the male, a note on the species seems warranted. Some time ago I received a female specimen in a collection of Homoptera collected in Bermuda and kindly given to me by Dr. C. M. Weed. Quite recently Prof. J. S. Hine has placed in my hands several specimens including both sexes, collected at the Gulf Biologic Station, Cameron, lyouisiana, in August, 1903. lo The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 1, He informs me that the two forms Avhich he felt confideot were male and female were taken at the same tune and on the same plant, Iva fnihsccns. While none were observed mating, the fact that they occurred so closely associated and that no other species of the genus was found to occur with them, makes the supposi- tion almost a certainty. Furthermore, they agree so closely in all generic characters that I do not hesitate to regard them as sexual complements and present herewith a description of the male. This differs strikingly in some respects from the female, though no more than is common to many species of Jassidae. Male. — Black, pronotum, and eh'tra, except at tip, silvery white with latter barely reaching lo tip of anal style, beneath black, tips of femora and most of tibiae and tarsi, except at the apex, brown. Length, 3.5mm. Width, 1.75 mm. Head as in female and face very long, pronotum very short and hind border evenly but very slightly convex, scutellum scarcely visible. Legs long, femora and tibiie much compressed but not foliaceous. Color. — Head piceous black, the sutures between the vertex and eyes pale, as also the triangular area between the vertex and eye and a narrow margin of the occiput. Front black with mid- dle line slightly paler and sides showing very obscure transverse markings. Pronotum above silvery white, changing to fuscus black on sides. Elytra silvery white to near the apex, apical margin deep piceous black. Abdomen above whitish, anal style light orange-yellow, black at tip, pygofer black. The females agree closel}^ with the description of the Florida specimen. The markings appear to vary in the different individ- uals somewhat, and the elytra in these specimens are distinctly brownish between the broad, whitish veins. Ovipositor is black, except a narrow ventral border, the inner faces of tibiae, and somewhat broken line on the femora and the inner face of the hind tibia black. The Bermuda specimen appears somewhat darker in general color, the head being somewhat infuscated, the elytral spaces a darker brown, and there is an additional short, broken fuscus stripe on the pronotum between the first and second stripes of either side. The apical spots extend further upon the cells, and one line in the outer cell is elongated and extends fully two-thirds of the length of the cell. These variations seem to me, however, to be entirely within the limits of specific variations. The distriliution of the insect based on these specimens would extend from Louisiana around the gulf coast and to Burmuda, and it seems ])robable that it will be found at intervening points on the Gulf coast, especially in the salt marshes where its host ])lant occurs, as well as westward and southward in suitable locations. Nov., 1903.] Notes on Interesting Ohio Willows. i i NOTES ON INTERESTING OHIO WILLOWS. Robert F. Griggs. Among the willows there are, as is well known, very many hybrids and freaks. These escape description in general works because each has an individuality of its own and the treatment of one is of suggestive value only for others. But to the student of dynamic nature these forms are of the most extreme interest as giving some clue to nature's methods of evolution. Likewise they are of niterest to the sj-stematist in a negative way because they stand in his wa}- and prevent the perfect classification of all plants into genera and species which he aims to accomplish. This general interest is the apolog}', if apology be needed, for report- ing some of the forms of this sort that have come under observa- tion. Salix interior var. WHEEI.ERI Rowlee. Since Prof. Rowlee' s publication not long ago of the variety wheeleri of the common long leaved willow, there has been some question as to its validity. Dr. Rydberg omitted it entirely from his revision of the willows in Britton's Manual. These doubts may be in a great measure due to lack of material of the variety as, indeed, Prof. Rydberg intimated to me in a letter not long since. Neither at Washington nor New York are there specimens nor at the time of publication did Prof. Rowlee himself have flowering material. Fortunately the plant grows abundantl}' on Cedar Point, and in close proximity to the species, so that there are exceptional opportunities for comparative study of the two. The two characters on which Prof. Rowlee named the variety were the greater wooliness of the leaves and their relatively greater breadth. All who know the long- leaved willow know how very variable the leaves are, both in shape and pubescence. Young leaves and those at the bases of secondary twigs are broader than others, and when the}' first appear the}' are fre- quentl}' densel}' covered with wool, though becoming entirely glabrous. The hairiness does not seem to have much taxonomic signifi- cance. Leaves on the same plant vary from one extreme to the other. Narrow leaved plants are almost as likely to be woolh' as broad leaved. Variation in hairiness is, so far as the writer can observe, entirely unconnected with variations in other directions. But in the breadth of the leaves, the Cedar Point plants much exceed the measurements given by Prof. Rowlee. Remaining about the length he describes, the}' are frequently more than two cm., or twice as broad. In its extreme development this broad leaved form is almost glabrous, not at all hairy as are many of 12 The Ohio Naturalist [Vol. IV, No. 1, the half-way forms from which, tinfortunately, the type was taken. The extreme forms are generally low, not more than one m. tall, and very bushy in habit, making them easih* distinguish- able from the typical forms of the species at a distance. Rarely, however, it grows into a more open shrub eight or ten feet tall. In its flowering habits it carries the peculiarities of vSalix inte- rior to an extreme. The species has a habit of sending out sec- ondary aments just below the first to open, so continuing the flowering period until late in the season. In the variety these secondary catkins become so prominent that the inflorescence sometimes takes on a cymose character. Half a dozen catkins are often seen in a cluster, all of about the same age. In the species thej^ come on one by one and are much less noticeble even when as numerous. The flowering period is also distinctly later than with the species. On Cedar point it seems to beat its height about the first of July and continues through the month, tapering off into August. The species growing near by has b}^ the first of July almost passed its flowering time and only a few straggling catkins can be found. It must be added in this coiniection that nearly all of the plants are staminate. Not over i per cent, of them are carpellate. What significance this ma}- have cannot be told as yet. Altogether the variety is so different from the sj^ecies that it would be taken for a distinct species on first sight. Because of numerous intermediates such an assumption could not be main- tained, but it is the best marked willow variety we have in the State. Salix pentandra in Ohio. Salix poitain/ra, the European species corresponding to .V^r//. r I Hilda, is not infrequently cultivated in Ohio for its twigs, which are of good quality for basket weaving. It is very similar to the American species and in some forms they can hardly be distin- guished. But the European species never has the very long attenuate, ovate leaves so characteristic of vigorous shoots of Salix liicida. Its leaves are rather thinner and less glossy, not so different from the ordinary willow leaf as those of Salix Incida. Salix poi/aiidra has not, to my knowledge, been reported as an escape in America. At least it is not included in the Manuals. This makes it of considerable interest to note that two plants have been detected escaped in Ohio. One is from Bridgeport, Belmont county, by Dr. W. A. Kellerman, the other from Co- lumbus. Any possible uncertainty as to identification owing to the similarity to the native species, is nnich reduced by the fact that both cases are in territory out of the range of Salix Incida, which occurs only in the northern part of the State. The reports of the collectors also make it certain that the plants were really wild and not cultivated. Nov., 1903.] Notes on Interesting Ohio Willows. 13 SalIX BABYLONICA X S. FRAGIIvIS. This cross is commou in Europe but so far as I know has not hitherto been reported in America. It is altogether to be expect- ed and it is very strange that it is so scarce. As is well known, Sa/i'.v babylonica exists in America — with extremely rare excep- tions— only as a carpellate plant. The flowers, however, genearlly seem to be fertilized for the capsules fill out well. The natural inference is that the pollen came from either .S". alba or S. fragiiis, the most closely related forms. If such be the case it is very strange that these h3'bridized seeds do not grow into trees more often than they do. The single plant which I was fortunate enough to find is grow- ing in a quarr}' near Sandusk}', where it has taken root in a waste place from which the stone has been removed. There are no other trees near by, and neither of the parents was seen in the immediate vicinity, though both are common in the region, Salix babylonica as an ornamental tree planted in the city 3'ards, and Salix jragUis as a very common escape. Its habit is striking, from a hundred feet away. When I first saw it I commenced to wonder what it could be. The first thought was Salix nigra. The leaves are narrow and about the the same color as .S". nigra. But there is something which gives an impression, when at a distance, different from ^S". nigra, though you cannot tell what it is. When you get up to it you find the leaves glaucous below ! It cannot be .S". nigra, it does not look like S. amygdaloidcs, nor kS". alba, nor S. fragilis, and so you may go over the catalogue successively den3dng it a place in any of the species, so peculiar does it seem. Most of the twigs are long, slender, semipendent. The buds on slender twigs are small, as in the weeping willow, on ranker growth, larger, about midway between the two species. The leaves on the upper branches are small, 6-7 cm. long, 8-10 mm. broad, quite glaucous or only paler beneath, close and even, sharp serrate, with a venation more irregular than that of Salix fragilis, pri- maries close with a strong suggestion of a marginal. On water shoots, the leaves approximate .S. fragilis more closel}' in form, being long, 16 cm., and narrow, 2 cm., with more distinct teeth. The veins, too, are more similar to ^. jragilis, but more irregu- larity is evident and the marginal is still suggested. The flowers, especially if they were carpellate, would be very interesting. They might show some peculiarities worthy of note. The identification without them cannot be said to be as positive as it might be. But the leaves are so closely intermediate as to leave but little doubt. If it should turn out to be something else it would be of even greater interest, for it is evidently very different from anything else hitherto discovered in our Ohio flora. 14 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 1, Salix nigra X Salix amygdaloides. The two parents of this hj-brid are so common and so closely related— one was formerly considered a variet}' of the other — that one would expect it to be one of the commonest crosses. But such is not the case. Less than half a dozen plants of it have been found within our borders. This is probabh' because Sa/ix aDiygda/oidc's blooms two weeks earlier than Salix u/ora and the two do not normally overlap, so that there is no chance for crossing. The scarcity of hybrids in this region is more remark- able from the fact that in some localities intermediates are very abundant. In the vicinity of St. Louis, where the southern Sa//x longipes enters in and complicates the matter, Dr. Glatfelter reports that not half the plants are nominal and that there are all sorts of intermediates connecting them. Prof. A. D. Selby collected the first plant from this State. It is, however, not a good intermediate, but is much closer to S. nigra. Later one or two trees were discovered around Columbus. These also were not as nearly half waj- between the two as might be desired. During the sunnner just pas.sed a very fine example was found within a stone's throw of the new Lake Laboratory building on Cedar Point. It is a ver}' fair intermediate betw^een the two species. From a distance it resembles Salix a)nygdaloides ; though only a bush in a thicket it has the clean branching habit of Salix amygdaloides m contrast to the scraggly habit of the other species. The slender- petioled leaves hang with that peculiar grace characteristic of the Peach-leaved Willow. The buds are nearly as large as in that species, i. e., twice as large as in the Black Willow. But the leaves are lanceolate, neither as broad as one nor as narrow as the other commonly is. The coarser venation is that of Salix aifiyg- daloidcs : there is scarceh' an}' marginal and the primaries are close, ascending. But the smaller veins show a reticulation as fine as in Salix nigra. The under surfaces of the leaves show no sign of the glaucescence of Salix amygdaloides, but are only .slightly paler as in the other species. An Ai?nok^[ality of Salix skricea. South of Columljus is a swamp, now nearly drained, which is one of the few places near the city where Salix serieea flourishes in abundance. Among several interesting forms growing here is one plant which may be somewhat contaminated with some other species or simply almormal. Part of its llow^ers are exactly as the}- should be in Salix serieea but others have a very peculiar a])pearance. The rhachis and scales are very wooly, covered with long white hair which all but conceals the capsules. The latter are .sometimes covered wdth Nov., 1903.] Notes on Interesting Ohio Willows. 15 long hair, rather thinly, or are almost glabrous, this last suggest- ing Saiix cordata. The leaves, however, show no sign of diverg- ence from Salix scricca. Carpeliferous Filaments in Salix nigra. There is one class of willow freaks reported comnionl}^ by others from other places which have escaped observation, if pres- ent, in Ohio. The class contains those forms, certainly more common in Salix than in almost an}- other genus, of plants which have mixed up in some way their staminate and carpellate flow- ers. All sorts of combinations and mixes of the two kinds of flowers are reported. These forms would be very interesting to experiment upon from a physiologcal point of view, as well as anatomicall}^ for they might throw some light on the problems connected with heredity and plasticity of cells. The plant is growing in the limestone bed of Jonathan creek at White Cottage, Ohio. It is a shrub 8°-io° tall, with the usual apperance of Salix nigra. At the time of collection, 23d of May, it had passed its prime but an abundance of flowering mate- rial was yet to be had. At first sight it looked as though it was monoecious, with both sorts of flowers on one plant. Some aments were normally staminate ; others were apparently all car- pellate ; and still others were partly staminate and partly carpel- late. But on closer examination it developed that none of the ovularies had stigmas, but that in every case the j^lace of that organ was taken by an anther. The ovularies, moreover, were not one to a flower, but each scale supported several, sometimes as many as five, but more often three or four. Sometimes they were joined together at their bases and radiated in all directions like prongs to some burr. Sometimes the stigmiform anther was sessile without a style ; or the style might be quite long. Occa- sionally the anther was supported on a long filament bearing a conical thickening at the base. Again one carpel may bear two stj'les, each with an anther. The anthers were all polleniferous and functional ; not one appeared withered or blasted. None of the carpels, however, under a low power, show developing ovules. They are frequentl}- hairy-like filaments and were colored yellow like them. It seems most rational to conclude that these pseudo- carpels were homologous to filaments and were influenced in some way to assume their thickened form. Summer-Flowering Willows. Occasionally when collecting, one meets with willows flowering late in the summer. In the long-leaved wnllows this is no remark- able thing, for they have a special adaptation to secure a long flowering period. But in the other groups it is an occurrence rare enough to call for note. During several seasons collecting four 1 6- The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 1, such instances have come to the writer's attention. At least one other instance has been reported previoush' .-•- In Ottawa county three years ago a good sized bush of Salix discolor was found with many catkins in August. They are not normal but much whiter than ordinary pussies, and many of the capsules are aborted. At Washington, late in the summer of 1902, a solitary carpellate anient was found at the tip of a leafy branch of Sa/ix scricca. This lone catkin was of normal appearance but about ready to drop off when noticed The third was a plant of Salix Candida, at Castalia, the past sununer, which had two carpellate aments just about at anthesis in July. These were normal and ordinar}- in every way except in being borne on leafy branches. Near Big Darby creek, in Franklin county, two plants (carpellate) of Sa/ix cordata were found in August, full of blossoms. The two were about a hundred feet apart and entirely unconnected. Why they should both be blooming at the same time is very peculiar — one of the interesting things which have 5-et to be explained or chance. All these instances are from among the species which flower earliest in the spring and hence develop their flowers furthest in the fall. It would be quite surprising to find Sa/ix )iigra, for instance, flowering a second time. In each case, except the reported instance of Sa/ix Iiuiui/is, the flowers were carpellate. This may be mere coincidence. It is difficult to see what reason there could be that the carpellate flowers should be especially liable to be affected in this waj'. Rather one would expect the staminate aments to furnish the most frequent examples because they seem to develop first in the spring. '■'O. A. Farwel, Second Flowering of Salix humilis. Bot. Gaz , 11 : 317. POISONOUS AND OTHER INJURIOUS PLANTS OF OHIO. John H. Schaffner. In the following catalogue of plants an attempt has been made to furnish students with a convenient reference list of the injuri- ous plants of Ohio, in the ho])e that it may be of service to those who wish to make a study of the subject. The list is believed to be fairly complete except the thallophytes, where only a small number of the most important Fungi have been included. I am under ver}^ great obligation to Mr. \'. K. Chesnut, of the U. S. Department of Agriculture, who has kindly added a large number of plants to the original list and furnished many of the notes given under the s]:)ecies. I wish here to express my thanks and appreciation of his invaluable a.ssistance and criticism. Nov., 1903.] Poisonous and Other Injurious Plants. 1 7 I. Thali-Ophyta. Fungi. I. Aspergillus lierbarioriim (Wiggers). (A. glaucus (L. ) Link.) Apparently the cause of "staggers" in horses, when eaten with food on which it grows. Claviceps purpurea ( Fr. ) Tul. Ergot. Very poisonous to stock. Ustilago maydis (DC.) Corda. Corn Smut. Causes death to cattle, although not supposed to be very poisonous. Ustilago avenae (Pers. ) Jens. Oat Smut. In large quan- tities it is poisonous to cattle. Tilletia tritici (Bjerk.J Wint. Stinking Smnt of Wheat. Poisonous to stock. Deleterious in the flour. Coleosporium solidaginis (Schw. ) Theum. Parasitic on species of Solidago. Supposed to be poisonous to horses, when eaten with the host plant. 7. Puccinia graminis Pers. Wheat Rust. Uredo stage. The spores cause inflamation of the mucous membrane of the mouth and nose of persons harvesting wheat. The sore- ness of the lips caused by the rust is often severe. 8. Boletus felleus Bull. Bitter Boletus. Poisonous to man. 9. Boletus piperatus Bull. Poisonous to man. 10. Cantharellus aurantiacus (Wulf.) Fr. Supposed to be pois- onous. 11. Hygrophorus conicus (Scop.) Fr. Poisonous to man. 12. lycntinus stipticus (Bull.) Schr. (Panus stipticus Fr.) Poisonous to man. 13. Marasmius peronatus (Bolt.) Fr. Supposed to be poisonous to man. 14. Marasmius urens (Bull.) Fr. Supposed to be poisonous. 15. Chalymatta campanulata (ly. ) Karst. Poisonous. 16. Hj^pholoma lacrimabundum Fr. Supposed to be poisonous. 17. Pholiota squarrosoides Peck. Poisonous. 18. Hj'porhodius clypeatus (L. ) Schr. (Entoloma clypeatum E.) Poisonous. 19. Volvaria glojocephala (DC.) Quel. Poisonous. 20. Volvaria vol vacea ( Bull. ) Sacc. Poisonous. 21. Agaricus illudens Schw. (Clitocj'be.) Poisonous. 22. Eepiota morgani Peck. Poisonous to man. 23. Amanita niappa (Batsch.) Sacc. Poisonous. 24. Amanita muscaria (Iv. ) Pers. Fly Amanita. Very poisonous when eaten and causes death. Poisonous also to cattle. Used as a fly poison. 25. Amanita phalloides (Fr.) Quel. Death Cup. [A. bulbosa Bull.) Poisonous. Probably the mo.st dangerous of all the American fungi. 1 8 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 1, 26. Amanita umbriiia (Pers.) Schr. (A. pantheriua (DC.) (Quel.). Poisonous to man. 27. Amanita verna Fr. Destroying Angel. Poisonous to man. 28. Amanita virosa (Fr.) Sacc. Poisonous. 29. Globaria bovista (L.) Quel. Giant Puff-ball. (Lycoper- don giganteum Batsch.) Poisonous if eaten after the white interior changes to a brownish color. II, Archegoniata. 30. Pteridium aquilinum (L. ) Kuhn. Eagle Fern. I^eaves supposed to be poisonous to cattle and horses. '31. Equisetum arven.se L. Common Horsetail. Supposed to to be injurious to horses, at least when it is in the form of hay. III. Spermatophyta. Gymnospermae. 32. Taxus canadensis Marsh. American Yew. Eeaves supposed to be poisonous to stock. 33. Juniperus communis L. Common Juniper. Goats are pois- oned from eating the leaves. 34. Juniperus virginiana L. Red Cedar. Poisonous to goats. Angiospermae. Monocotyledones. 35. Arisaema triphyllum L. Jack-in-the-pulpit. Underground parts somewhat poisonous, but edible when Ijoiled or roasted a short time. 36. Calla palustris L. Water Arum. Poisonous. 37. Spathyema foetida (L.) Raf. Skunk Cabbage. Has an acrid juice and a disagreable odor which .seems to cause headache. 38. Alisma plantago L. Water Plantain. Has poisonous effect on cattle. 39. Sagittaria latifolia Willd. Eroad-leaved Arrow-head. The rootstalk contains a bitter milky juice in the raw state, but is edible when cooked. 40. Xeluml)o lutea (Willd.) Pers. American Nelumbo. The rootstock is sometimes used to kill roaches. 41. Chaetocloa italica (L.) Scrib. Millet. Hungarian. The hay, if fed in large quantities and too frequently, is inju- rious to horses. 42. Loliuni tenuilentum L. Darnel. Poisonous. Grain nox- ious and injurious when ground in with flour. 43. Zygadenus elegans Ph. Zygadeue. Swamp Camas. Pois- onous to cattle and shee]i, sometimes causing death. 44. Melanthium virginicum I^. Bunch-flower. Rhizome is poLsonous. Nov., 1903.] Poisonous and Other Injurious Plants. 19 45. Veratrum viride Ait. American White Helebore. Roots are poisonous. 46. Veratrum woodii Robb. Wood's False Helebore. Poison- ous like the preceding species. 47. L,iliuni superbum L. Turk's-cap lyily. The pollen is said to cause skin poisoning. 48. Asparagus officinalis L. Asparagus. Will sometimes blis- ter the skin of those who work with it. The seeds are used as a substitute for coffee. 49. Convallaria majalis L,. Lily-of-the-valley. All parts of the plant are verj' poisonous to man, horses and cattle. 50. Trillium grandiflorum (Mx.) Salisb. Large-flowered Wake- robin. Emetic. Contains saponin. 51. Trillium erectum h. Ill-scented Wake-robin. Rhizome somewhat poisonous. 52. Smilax rotundifolia L. Round-leaved Greenbrier. A case of poisoning from eating the young leaves is reported. 53. Iris versicolor I,. Large Blue-flag. Underground parts are poisonous. 54. Cypripedium reginae Walt. Showy Lady's-slipper. ( C. spectabile Swz.j Poisonous to the skin, much like Poison Iv5'. x\t least 50 per cent, of persons are suscep- tible. 55. Cypripedium hirsutum ]\Iill. Large Yellow Lady's-slipper. ( C. pubescens Willd. ) Poisonous like the preceding species. ^6. .Cypripedium parviflorum Salisb. Small-flowered Lady's- slipper. This species is also poisonous, but to a less extent than the other two. DiCOTYLEDONES. 57. Toxylon pomiferum Raf. Osage Orange. The thorns produce poisonous wounds in the skin. Horses acquire a strong liking for the 3-oung shoots and eat them in large quantities without apparent ill eft'ects. 58. Hnmulus lupulus L. Hop. Hop pickers often have an inflammation of the hands. 59. Cannabis sativa L. Hemp. The resin of this plant is a powerful narcotic. An intoxicating drink is prepared from the dried leaves. The leaves and other parts are smoked for their intoxicating and narcotic effects. 60. Urtica dioica L. Stinging Nettle. Stinging and injurious to the .skin. 61. Urtica gracilis L. Slender Nettle. Injurious to the skin of man and horses. (To be continued.) 20 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 1, MINOR PLANT NOTES, No. 5. W. A. KEr.LERMAN. White Heath Aster. — Some notes were given in a former number of the Ohio Naturalist concerning the Aster ericoides, the White Heath Aster. Opportunity was afforded in 1903 to see the behavior of this species in Washington County, Ohio. Here, as was the case in Adams County, the plant, if unmolested, soon takes full possession of the pastures and roadsides, and all neglected arable ground. While it does pre- vent washing of the hillsides, it would not seem to be a profitable plant to grow or to let grow for this purpose; grasses rather should be cultivated. The thrifty farmer apparently has no annoyance from this weed, since it does not venture to grow on ground occupied icit/i properly cultivated crops. It is believed that the former estimate and judg- ment relative to Aster ericoides does not need revision. Beat That? — At the end of the previous growing season there was found in a garden, a beet (not a dead beet) that had been evidently struggling heroically against adverse circumstan- ces. Adjacent sweet pea vines, not properly supported, had fallen over and partially smoth- ered a row of garden beets. One of these made an effort to reach up to the light but was caught again and dragged down. It evidently per- sisted in its efforts and the result is shown in the marginal figure reproduced from a photograph. The stem sent up many many small branclies whose small leaves obtained the neces-sar}- sun- shine. This struggle for existence also awakened the instinct of reproduction and accordingly an elongated inflorescence was formed. Numerous flowers and .some fruits were produced. The total length of the stem was six feet. Abnormal Leaves of Aesculus Glabra. — A very striking case of abnormal leaves was recently noticed near Columbus, in a grove of small trees of the Ohio Buckeye, x-\esciilus glabra. Earlier in the season they had been quite denuded of leaves by insect depredation. A den.se tuft of leaves termina- ted each of the twigs — in itself cons]-)icuous — and nearly half of the new leaves were more or less aborted and abnormal. The Nov., 1903.] Minor Plant Notes. 21 leaflets were seldom of the normal shape, the lamina generally extendining downward to the petiole — a suggestion of a pinnate tj-pe — and the whole affair presenting a crumpled and distorted aspect. The accompanxing sketches indicate some of the com- moner outlines. Abnormal Leaves of Aesculus glabra. Large Ohio Trees. — From time to time as opportunity- offered, trees of unusual size have been measured with the results here tabulated — the measurements taken about three or four feet from the ground : Name. Locality. Circumference. Acer negundo, Box Elder. Columbus ... 8 ft. 2 in. Acer saccharinuni, Silver Maple. S3'mmes Creek, Lawrence County ' 8 ft. Aesculus glabra, Ohio Buckeye. Marblehead, Ottawa Co. . . . 9 ft. Aesculus octandra, Sweet Buckeye. Manchester, Adams Co. 9 ft. Asimina triloba, Papaw. Symmes Creek Valley, Lawrence County 3 ft. Betula nigra, River Birch. Hocking Co 7 ft. Castanea dentata, Chestnut. Brush Tp., Scioto Co ^3 ft. Catalpa catalpa, Catalpa. Symmes Creek Valley, Lawrence Count}' 9 Celtis occidentalis, Hackberry. Columbus 10 Cercis canadensis, Red Bud. Cedar Hill, Fairfield Co. ..... . 5 ft. Cornus florida, Dogwood. Symmes Creek Valley, Lawrence County Crataegus mollis. Red-fruited Thorn. Marblehead, Ottawa Co. 6 2 S I in. in. in. in. in. in. ft. ft. ft. ft. 2 in. S'A in. m. in. 2 2 The Ohio Naturalist [Vol. IV, No. 1, Name. I,ocality. Circumference. Crataegus punctata, Thorn. Amanda, P'airfield Co i ft. 6 in. Diospyros virginiana, Persinnnon. Cedar Hill, Fairfield Co. 5 ft. 7, '2 in. Fagus americana, Beech. Arion, Scioto Co 12 ft. 4 in. Fraxinus quadrangulata. Blue Ash. Columbus 7 ft. 7/2 in. Gleditsia triacanthos, Honey Locust. Sandusky 10 ft. 2 in. Gymnocladus dioica, Kentucky Coffee Tree. Columbus 7 ft. 9^2 in. Liriodendron tulipifera, Tulip Tree. Hocking Co 13 ft. Magnolia acuminata, Cucuni1)er Tree. Lawrence Co 4 ft. S in. Mains coronaria, Crab Apple. Amanda, Fairfield Co 2 ft. y'/i in. Nyssa sylvatica, Sour Gum. Otway, Scioto Co 8 ft. 10 in. Ostrya virginiana, Ironwood. Waynesville, Warren Co 3 ft. 7 in. Oxydendruni arboreum, Sorrel Tree. Saltpetre Cave, Hock- ing Co 4 ft. S in . Platanus occidentalis, Sycamore. Groveport, Franklin Co. . . 23 ft. 5 in. Quercus acuminata. Yellow Oak. Wa3-nesville, Warren Co. . 8 ft. 5 in. Ouercus alba. White Oak. Bainbridge, Ross Co 15 ft. 6 in. Quercus leana, Lea's Oak. Cedar Point, Erie Co 4 ft. 5 in. Ouercus macrocarpa. Bur Oak. Cedar Hill, Fairfield Co 12 ft. i in. Ouercus palustris, Pin Oak. Bainbridge, Ross Co 8 ft. ij4 in. Ouercus prinus. Chestnut Oak. Bainbridge, Ross Co .... 9 ft. S in. Ouercus stellata, Iron Oak. Cedar Hill, F'airfield Co 10 ft. 10 in. Rhanmus carolinianus, Buckthorn. Cedar Mills, Adams Co. . 11 in. Rhus hirta, Staghorn Sumach. Geneva, Ashtabula Co 2 ft. 9 in. Robinia pseudac;icia. Black Locust. Waynesville, Warren Co. 10 ft. 4 in. Sassafras sassafras, Sassafras. Bainbridge, Ross Co 6 ft. 4 in. Ulnius americana, American Elm. Columbus 15 ft. 8 in. NOTE ON ARADUS ORNATUS (Say). Herbert Osborn. Aradus ornatu.«! was described b}- Say in 1831, since which time it has remained ahnost unrecognized, the only record being that of Bergroth who mentions a specimen* and suggests that the spe- cies that had usualh' borne this name in collections was one to which he gives the name " dtizei." A short time ago in looking over Mr. Dury's interesting col- lection I found three specimens of this species, which was new to me, and with his kind permission they were brotight to Columbus for study. Careful comparison with the related species and Say's description proved them to be certainly his ornattis and it is no small pleastire to add this rare and handsome species to otu" local fainia. As Say's description was written from specimens taken in Indiana, presumably in New Harmon}^ these captures at Cin- cinnati may be considered ([uite near to the type locality, and since they agree in the minutest details with Say's description, they may be considered as typical examples for the species. The species agrees with robiistiis and diizci in having swollen antennae but differs from both . in the three shiny spots at the hind border of the pronotum, and from robustus in the nuich lighter color. Proceedings Entomological Society, Washington, II, 332. Nov., 1903.] Notes and News. 23 THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF PLANTS. V. John H. Schaffnfr. The plants listed below were measured during the past season in Ohio and Kansas. All are considerably taller than given in Britton's Manual: OHIO. Bromus tectorum L., . Urtica gracilis Ait., Thalictrum purpurascens L., Iinpatiens aiirea Muhl., Angelica atropnrpurea L,., Daucus carota L., . Pastinaca sativa L., Carduus altissimus L. , Lactiica canadensis L. , KANSAS. Sagittaria latifolia Willd., Phleuni pratense L., Eh'inus virginicus L., Elynius canadensis I,., Rumex crispus L., Saponaria officinalis L., Brassica nigra (L. ) Koch., Penthorum sedoides I,., Geum canadense Jacq., Althaea rosea Cav. , Asclepias syriaca L., Marrnbium viilgare L,., Aster viniineus Lam., Chrvsanthemuni leucanthemimi L, 3K feet io>^ 8 J'A 10 5X 10 12K lly^ 5 5 5 7X 5^3 4 *8 2>^ 3H 10 JH 4 63^ 3/2 NEWS AND NOTES. The thirteenth annual meeting of the Ohio State Academy of Science will be held a Denison University, Granville, Ohio, Nov. 27th and 2Sth. The Ohio State Academy of Science has this j'ear published three important "Special Papers." The first is Special Paper No. 5, Tabanidae of Ohio, by James S. Hine. This is a pamphlet of 63 pages and, in addition to a general disciLSsion of the life history and anatomy of these insects, it contains a catalogue of Taban- idae from America North of Mexico and a sj'stematic treatise of Ohio .species with kej^s for their identification. Special Paper No. 6 is entitled " The Birds of Ohio," A Revised Catalogue, by Lynds Jones. It contains 241 pages and gives a general view of Ohio in relation to its bird life and a list of the :24 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 1, Ohio birds with notes on each species. This paper is an impor- tant contribution to our knowledge of the local avifauna and will certainly do much to advance the stud}- of ornitholog}- in Ohio. Special Paper No. 7, by Thomas A. Bonser, is entitled " Eco- logical Stud}^ of Big Spring Prairie," Wyandot Count}-, Ohio. It contains 96 pages with maps and numerous illustrations and is a very complete presentation of the ecolog}- of the area under consideration. J. H. S. A specimen of the Paddle-fish, Polydon spathula ( Wal.), was seen by the undersigned in the Post Company's Fish House, Sandusky, Ohio, in August of the present year. According to Osburn (Fishes of Ohio, Special Paper 4, O. Ac. Sc, p. 18), records of its occurrence in the Great Lakes are not abundant. From the fishermen, I learned that the fish is seen at irregular intervals but not commonlv- Max Morse. MEETING OF THE BIOLOLICAL CLUB- Orton Hall, June i, 1903. After the reading of the minutes of the previous meeting the committee on nominations reported the following board of editors for the Naturalist : Editor-in-Chief J. H. Schaffner. Business Manager, . . . . J. S. HiNE. Associate Editors. Geology, J. A. Bownocker. Zoology, . . . . . . F. L. Landacre. Archaeology, . . . . . W. C. Mills. Botany, ...... W. A. Kellerman. Ecology, O. E. Jennings. Ornithology, Max Morse. Upon motion the Club adopted tliL- report and elected the ■editors as recommended. Mr. C. W. Mally spoke to the Club of his experience in South Africa. The climate is adapted to grow most of our temperate crops. There is great need of a vegatable pathologist. Ento- mology is strictly economic and the strictly scientific work is done in England and in this countr}-. Under reports on theses, I\Ir. J. G. Sanders reported the addi- tion of 21 or 22 species and 4 genera of scale insects to the State list and the description of three new species. Mr. Swezey reported work on the life histories of some of the Fulgoridae. Mr. E. A. Sanders reported a joint thesis with Mr. A. W. Whetstone upon the forest ecology of Franklin County. Robert F. Griggs, Scartcuv. Starling Medical College^ Corner State and 6th Streets, COLUMBUS, OHIO. ^ ^ MEDICAL AND SURGICAL CLINICS AT FOVR EXCELLENT HOSPITALS. ^ ^ ^ ^ WELL EQUIPPED AND THOROIGH IN EVERY DETAIL. EXCEPTIONAL CLINICAL ADVANTAGES. CURTIS C. HOWARD, M. Sc, Registrar. STARLING LOVING, M. D., LL. D., Dean. DIE STAMPING. PLATE AND LETTER PRESS PRINTING. SPAHIj & GLENN, PRINTERS AND PUBLISHERS. 50 EAST BROAD STREET. COLUMBUS, OHIO. LONG & KILER University Supplv Store Corner Eleventh Avenue and High Street, Removed from Main Building, Ohio State University. Books, Drawing Material, Fine Stationery, Etc. Special Orders for Books solicited. A fine line of FOUNTAIN FENS and COLLEGE FINS. ^rioafc (^mBufatice ^eroice. ^tfttp^onc 18- Jiineraf ©irec^ore* 1239 fo 1241 (Jt. §ig3 #frecf. CofumBuB, (ftaio. Photos ' ' ' FROM THE OliD f^ELilABliE Baker's Art Gallery State and High Sts., ARE THE BEST. The Largest, Finest and Best Equipped Gallery in America. JJedieal and Seientifie Books The Second liapgest Stoek in Ohio. The raiost liberal discounts given Public and Private liibPaPies. Sold at liA/holesale Prices. CATAUOCUE Fr^EE^_^^a^^HH^^^>^ Li. S. WEliliS, * 665 floPth Higl^ Street, COLiUjVIBUS, OHIO. Both Telephones. I^educcd Hates to Teachers. \ \ 1J "Da<(vsons Bitds of Ohio" SCIENTIFIC! WILL ILLUSTRATE AND DESCRIBE THE 322 SPECIES OF OHIO BIRDS. POPULAR! A BOOK FOR BIRD LOVERS, NATURE STUDENTS AND THOSE WHO VALUE GOOD READING. It will contain a com = plete account of plum = ages, range, nesting, etc., together with piquant sketches and condensed life^Iiistories of the birds themselves. The text is by Rev. W. Leon Dawson, of Columbus ; the intro- Vduction and analytical ikeys by Lynds Jones, S. M., of 3berlin, both well = ;nown ornithologists. Soug Sparrows.— A Brooding Female Being Fed by Mate. Specimen illustriilion from "Dawson's Bird.« of Ohio." Plioto by J. B. Parker. fl MAGNIFICENTLY ILLUSTRATED BY 80 SELECTED PLATES IN COLOR a"d ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ !00 ORIGINAL HALF-TONES From Photographs Taken in Ohio. SHOWING THE WILD BIRDS AND THEIR HAUNTS. f, Wo expense is being: spared to make of this work a sumptuous volume, complete in every detail, lie BEST OF ITS CLASS, yet well within the reach of all. PRICES RANGE FROM $5.75 to $7.50 ACCORDING TO BINDING. IBiQUIKV COUfOI^. THE WHEATON PUBLISHING CO. 1216 The Hayden, Columbus, O. Please send me specimen pages of your forthcoming work, "Dawson's Birds of Ohio," also si)ecial terms by which I may secure a numljered copy of the Autlior's Autograph Edition. Name Address . SPECIAL TERMS TO ADVANCE SUBSCRIBERS. The Autlior's Autograph Edition of 1,000 copies, limi- ted, is being rapidly sub- scribed for. Sign "Inquiry Coupon." ORDER NOW. "HE WHEATON PUBLISHING CO., I2I6 The Hayden. COLUMBUS, OHIO. Your Laboratory ^ s^ s» Is it supplied with the latest and most usable appar= atus, and are you drawing your supplies from the most available source? Send us a trial order and notice the difference. j5i ^ ^ ^ a, ^ ^ Scientific Materials Company MAKERS = = = IMPORTERS 711?^ Penn Ave. Pittsburgh, Pa. ne Ohio I\^a/w7'afc/, PUBLISHED BY The Biological Club of the Ohio Slate University. Volume IV. DECEMBER, 1903. No. 2. TABLE OF CONTENTS Morse — The Transmission of Ac(inircil ('liariioter- 25 SCHAFFNER — Notes Oil ttie Nutation of Plants 30 ScHAFFNER-Poisonons and Other Injnrions Plants of Ohio (continiK'd) :!2 OsBoKN - Aradidae of Ohio oi! OsiiORN— A Subterranean Koot— Infesting Fulgorid -ll OsBOKN— New Species of Ohi;> Fnl.^oridae -14 News and Notes 17 CoBERLY— MeetiuL's of the Biologieal (;inb -17 THE TRANSMISSION OF ACQUIRED CHARAC- TERS.- Max Morse. I shall invite your attention this evening to a theme which like the poor, "Ye have ahvaj-s with you." It is the old question whether the changes in the growing organism, or the adult, pro- duced by the direct action of the environment about it, are carried, through heredity, to the offspring. Jean Lamark first used the term " acquired character" to designate characters such as these and to him are we to look for the first clear statement of the case. By this it is not to be understood that the idea of the transmis- sion of acquired characters arose with Lamark. No great gener- alization ever arose or ever can arise with one man alone. The attribution of the idea of the transmission of acquired characters to Lamark falls in the same category as attributing evolution to Darwin. And as Darwin first attempted to ansivcr the question how organisms change, Lamark first raised the question how the}' change at all. The Greeks in the dawn of history accounted for diversity in living forms by the direct effect of environment. Indeed, not until the time of Darwin was there a rival theory advanced. And we can easily see the reason for this when we consider the directness and naivete of the transmission theory as against the negative action of selection. The histor}- of science shows that hypotheses created as explanations of natural phe- nomena are at iirst simple and that it is only when the phenomena nre better understood that the h}'potlieses become more complex. The Corpuscular Theory of light in Newton's sense sufficed for a =■'■ Presidential Address, Biological Club, Nov. 2, 1903. 26 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 2, long time to explain that phenomenon and it has been revived in a refined, augmented and complex form to stand as the modern theory of light. And so, had selection been advanced at first as an explanation of diversity in plants and animals, it would have meant a far deeper insight into the ways of Nature than the Greeks had at that time. What, we may ask, is an acquired character? That it is a difficult task to answer this question one may infer from the fact that in the periodical Nature for 1895, a discussion, ranging over six or seven numbers and led by some of the greatest workers in biology was carried on, each contributor offering a different defi- nition of varying length and complexity. And it is doubtful whether the discussion ended because a conclusion had been reached or whether no more space could be given by the publish- ers. The most comprehensive definition of the term is that an acquired character is a modification of an organism in its ontog- eny, produced by reactions to external stimuli. Its opposite is the congenital character which arises from the genital cell irre- spective of external conditions. Now, obviously, these defini- tions involve severe difficulties, if not in themselves, at least in their application. Fur the sake of clearness, let us consider the development of an organism in ontogeny and phylogeny. The Protozoa or Protophyta cannot be said to have an onto- geny. Whatever may be said to be the method of reproduction in them, we ma}^ reduce it to its simplest terms — binar}- fission. Consequently, we cannot speak of palingenesis or cenogenesis in in the protozoa or protophyta. Since there is no division of labor whereby one portion of the organism is set apart to perform the function of nutrition, another for reproduction, etc., we can say that the environment exerts a direct effect on the reproductive element and the transmission of acquired characters in unicellular forms is a reality. But when we pass the line between the uni- cellular forms and multicellular forms, our problem is different. Here we have division of labor. One cell has as its special func- tion the elimination of waste; another, movement, while the thirtl reproduces the animal or plant in its entirety. The question arises, is the method here the same as in the unicellular forms ? Or is there a modification necessary to meet the new conditions? In the case of the one celled forms, the nivirouii/e>if of the repro- ductive element is the environment of the organism as a whole, while in the multicellular forms the environment of the germinal cell is the group of cells surrounding it — \.\\^ environment of the nuil- ticellular organism being the medium outside the body which rarel)' or never comes in contact with the germ cell, at least until that cell is mature. Hence the ca.se is different. In the latter case — i. e , the nnilticellular organisms, the generative cell would react to such stinnili as are furnished by the surrounding body. Dec, 1903.] Transmission of Acquired Characters. 27 We may sum up these stimuli as nutritive, respiratory, mechani- cal, thermic, perhaps electrical and finally, what some will have — a stimulus due to irritability, a virtual vital force. Now one school holds that there is no connection or direct communication between germ cell and body cell,* while another says there is and has shown that there is a possible means of communication by certain protoplasmic bridges that are known to occur at least in some cases. It is obvious what application this has to the sub- ject in hand. The germ-cell in the multicellular forms, located as it is deep in the tissues of the body and away from the sur- roundings of the organism to which it belongs, may react in one of two ways: it may react to simply the stimuli given by the cells immediately surrounding it or to this p/us an effect induced by something such as a nervous force, as was mentioned as a possi- ble means of communication between more distant cells. The existence of such a force is not countenanced b)^ modern biolo- gists and it is useless to follow the theme longer. This leaves us with but the hypothesis of Darwin which he termed that of Pan- genesis. Darwin early saw the necessity of some such lij^pothe- sis, if acquired characters are inherited, in accounting for a mean.^ of communication between the body-cells and the germ-cells. In place of a subtle force, Darwin postulated an actual material transmission of a portion of the body-cell to the germ-cell. He assumed protoplasm to be composed of pangens or corpuscles and that these might pass from cell to cell carrying with them the characters, hereditary and acquired, of the cell from which they came. The pangens migrate from the body-cell to the germ-cell and becoming resident there, are transmitted to the offspring, in which they pass to the several parts of the body, thus reproduc- ing the form of the parent. An acquired character could thus be inherited. From other considerations Darwin was led to believe strongly in the transmission of acquired characters and it is a mark of farsightedness on his part when he saw the necessity of some such hypothesis, and met it. It is well to note in passing that the so-called Neo-Darwinians are more Darwinian than tlie man himself, paradoxical as it may seem. Darwin believed, and that strongly, in the transmission of the direct effects of environ- ment and attempted to explain it, and it is only his followers that have dropped it from the creed. So much, then, for the a priori condition of the subject. We have seen that in unicellular forms, acquired characters are inherited and that in so far, in nuilticellular forms, as we can treat the germ-cell as a single cell, and apart from the somatic "The term "germ-ceU" is meant to desigate such cells as reproduce the parent form —all other cells being "body cells." Obviously the argument which was originally applied to sex-cells will apply to cases of vegetative reproduction equally well, as in cases of budding, spores, polyembryony, etc. 2 8 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 2, cells, its acquired characters are inherited; but when we begin to consider that it ma}- be affected in a larger way b}' remoter por- tions of the body, either through pangens or some other means, the question takes another turn. Is it not difficult to imagine how some specific change in a remote portion of the body can be registered on the germ-ccll with the result that the offspring has reproduced in it the same specific modification ? Of course, incon- ceivabilit}' can never be advanced as an argument, pro or con, unless an easier explanation is at hand, and in this case many think there is. lyCt us turn now to another phase of the subject. Breeders and fanciers have long insisted that their produce show case after case of the inheritance of acquired modifications. Nay, indeed are not our social institutions themselves built on this assumption? Edu- cate the father and the child will profit thereby. Raise the man of the slums and thereby better his offspring. What teacher that will not on first thouglit answer that the child of an educated parent learns more easily than that of an ignorant and illiterate father? And so we may read in the stock journals and the fanciers journals of the transmission of acquired traits and an outbreak of discussion is probable at an}- time. Of discussions on this topic the most noteworthy is the Spencer-Weismann controversy that was carried on in the pages of the Contemporary Rcvieic in 1893. The discussion arose from an article by Herbert vSpencer entitled "The Inadequac}' of Natural Selection." In it he attempted to show that coadaptation of the various parts of the body of an organism could be explained far easier by admitting the transmis- sion of functional changes than b}' the theory of Natural Selec- tion. From the law of probability he attempted to show that the chance of two characters that were mutually adapted arising in the same individual was almost infinite. As a concrete example he took the case of the stag wiih its antlers weighing pounds. Now in an adult stag we find the most beautiful coadaptation of parts to parts. The shoulder mu.scles are immense, the front legs are much stronger than the hinder pair, there is an increased blood supply to these i)arts, etc. How, he asks, can we assume that all these adaptations arose simultaneously in the same individual as variations, so tliat from the other less favorable conditions these were selected by natural .selection? How nuich easier, he says, is the transmission hypothesis to be applied here! In answering this-and admitting the force of the argument, Weismann submits that if one case cotild beshcnvn whereby there is no po.ssibilit>- of the transmission of acquired characters the burden of proof would fall to the transmissionists. As such a case he brings forward that of the worker bcc-. It is well known that the worker bee as well as the soldier termite produce no off- spring, as in their development the organs of generation atrophy. Dec, 1903.] Transmission of Acquired Characters. 29 Obviously, selection of favorable variations is the only explana- tion here. If, then, we must assume that, for instance, the im- mense jaws with the corresponding muscles of the termite soldier are produced by selection, why must we assume a different cause in the case of the antlers of the stag ? When all evidence is weighed, it must be admitted that here is a solution of the prob- lem. The problem has been attacked from other points of view. Thus, Henry Fairfield Osborn, in an article in the A /fn'/iavi Nat- uralist^^ .shows the plausability of the transmission of functional changes being the method of evolution in organic life. It is too much to assume, he says, that the tubercles in the teeth of mam- mals have been formed in an}- way other than by the the transmis- sion of mechanical mouldings. Eimer, the friend of Weismann, is the author of an elaborate volume in which he presents an array of facts in support of the transmission theory. He lays special stress on the matter of the pigmentation of the races of man. He finds that in the Nile valley there is a gradation, as one passes from Alexandria southward, in the color of the native races from an intense black to lighter complexions through vari- ous intermediate shades. How, he asks, are we to account for such gradations by the preservation of favorable variations? Is it not more logical to assume that they have been the direct effect of environment from generation to generation ? Eimer' s work is written in German and J. T. Cunningham of England has trans- lated it. This author himself is a firm believer in the transmis- sion hypothesis and is a frequent contributor to the subject. To him is due partly the prominence that the question occupies at the present time. We have considered thus far proofs from the a priori point of view and also deductive proofs. There remains but one class of evidence — experimental. The classic experiments of Brown- Sequard on the guinea pig, in which he attempted to show that epilepsy, caused by the severance of the spinal cord in adults was transmitted to the offspring, are now considered invalid since germs of disease may be transmitted in the germ-cells as .syphillis is known to be. There have been thousands of cases reported of the so-called transmission of mutilations. Absolutely no depend- ence can be put on the large majority of these because of insuffi- cient data. Moreover, regeneration is .so general that it is a priori improbable that amputations and the like are ever transmitted. The acme of attempts at experimental proof is found in the work of John Cossar Ewart, the Scotchman. The experiments in breeding zebras, horses, sheep, dogs, rabbits, etc., that he has carried out are of the highest type of scientific work. Environed * American Naturalist, 23 : 561. 30 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 2, as he is by transmissionists, both as men of science on the one hand and with fanciers on the other, one would expect him to follow. But he does not, and as a conclusion to these remarks and as an expression of what the speaker deems the sentiment of those biologists who have worked more especially in this field, the following summary of his experiments, given by himself before the British Association, is appended : "In my experiments I have never seen anything that would point to the transmission of an acquired character." Note. — Since the above was prepared, a volume from Macmil- lan & Co. , written by Thomas Hunt Morgan and entitled ' ' Evo- lution and Adaptation" has appeared. In this book is found a treatment of the general subject in the light of recent research. It may be said that the transmission hypothesis is not counte- nanced by this author. NOTES ON THE NUTATION OF PLANTS. John H. Schaffner. In the summer of 1896, the writer studied the nutation of Hel- ianthus annuus ( i ) and found that in this plant we have one of the most remarkable and striking diurnal phenomena to be ob- served in the plant kingdom. It has been believ^ed quite generallj^ that the disc of flowers follows the sun but Kellerman (2 ) showed conclusively that this is not the case. The nutation occurs in the upper part of the stem before anthesis, the terminal rosette fol- lowing the sun from morning until sunset. Along with H. annu- us, H. scaberrimus was studied and found to act in the same way. In 1900, the cultivated variety of H. annuus was reported (3) to nutate as strongly as the wild variety, and the same was observed in regard to H. petiolaris. More recently Stevens (4) has shown that a similar nutation occurs in various other genera of widely separated families. He found nutation in Bidens frondosa and Ambrosia artemisaefolia. He also mentions the genera, Amaranthus, Lespedeza, Melilotus (especially M. alba), Medicago, and Trifolium, as containing species which show more or less nutation. During the past summer numerous observations were made on various plants in Clay county, Kansas. The writer had himself noticed the nutation of Ambrosia trifida in 1897, but it was not included in a previous report as no careful observations had been made. The giant ragweed nutates very decidedly when conditions are favorable, often bending 90° to the west in the evening. In the morning the bending of the stem is Dec, 1903.] Notes on Nutation of Plants. 31 usually not more than 2o°-3o° east. During dr}- weather the amount of nutation was increased by watering the plants. As in the sunflower, the stem is usually straight by 10 o'clock at night. Ambrosia artemisaefolia was studied and found to nutate well, as reported by Stevens. Ambrosia psylostachya and Xanthium speciosum also nutate, considerable movement of the stem being readily observed during favorable conditions. Helianthus maxi- miliani, H. grosseserratus, H. hirsutus, and H. tubersus nutate well before anthesis. H. maximiliani is especially striking on Fig. I. Fig. Fig. I. Helianthus annuus nutating to the west at 7 p. M. Fig. 2. Ambrosia trifida at 7 p. m. Both from Clay Co., Kansas. occount of its stout stem and slender, rigid leaves. On favorable days the nutation is 90° west in the evening and 20° or more east in the morning. Although Stevens gives Amaranthus as a genus which shows nutation, he does not name the species observed. During the past summer two species were studied by the writer, namely, Amaranthus hybridus and A. retroflexus. The first nutates the more prominently both in the morning and evening, probably be- cause of its more slender stem. The process is much the same as in the sunflowers, but the curve in the stem is not nearly so abrupt. However, on favorable evenings the terminal rosette faces the setting sun to such an extent that the rays of light fall on the broad surface of the leaves at right angles. 32 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 2, The wild variety of Helianthns anninis still appears to the writer to be ///c nutating plant. For on certain cloudy days when nutation is very slight in such plants as H. maxiniiliani and Am- brosia trifida it is still very decided in this species. Occasionall}' there are days in which all the factors favorable to nutation are at a maximum. Such days may be distinguished as special " nutation days." One of the most remarkable in the writer's experience was August 5, 1903. The ground was moist but the sky was exceedingly clear. The sunlight was very intense during the entire da}-. Toward evening all the nutating plants in the fields and roadsides presented an appearance not soon to be forgotten. The various sunflowers, ragweeds, and amaranths were all nodding to the west at an angle of 90°, giving to the landscape a ver}' peculiar and even unnatural appearance. In the account given above, fifteen species of nutating plants are named. There are probably scores of others in the United States which show a diurnal bending or nutation of the stem to a greater or less extent. 1. ScHAFFNER, JOHN H. Observations on the Nutation of Helianthns annuns. Bot. Gaz. 25 : 395-403. 1898. 2. Kkllerm.'\n, W. a. Observations on the Nutation of Sunflowers. Trans. Kan. Acad. Sci. 12 : 140-158. 1889-90. 3. SCHAFFNER, John H. The Nutation of Helianthus. Bot. Gaz. 29 : 197-200. 1900. 4. Stevens, F. L. Nutation in Bidens and Other Genera. Bot. Gaz. 35 : 363-366. 1903. POISONOUS AND OTHER INJURIOUS PLANTS OF OHIO. John H. Schaffner. (Continued from p. 19.) 62. Urtica urens L. Small Nettle. Produces irritation of the skin. A severe case of poi.soning is reported, caused by drinking a hot infusion of this plant. 63. Urticastrum divaricatum (L.) Ktz. Wood Nettle. (La- portea canadensis Gaud.) Injurious to the touch. 64. Phoradendron flavescens ( Ph. ) Nutt. American Mi.stletoe. Berries jjoisonous when eaten b}- children. 65. Rumex acetosella h. Sheep Sorrel. Seeds said to poison horses and sheep. Leaves, when eaten in large quanti- ties, are poisonous. 66. Fagopyrum fagopyrum (L.) Karst. Buckwheat. Causes the formation of a rash on some persons, when eaten. Buckwheat straw is considered injurious. Dec, 1903.] Poisonous and Other Injurious Plants. 33 67. Poly,2,'onum hydropiper L. Smart- weed. Very acrid. Some- times causes inflammation when applied to the skin. 68. Polygonum punctatum Ell. Dotted Smart-weed. Sonie- tinie.s causes inflammation of tlie skin. 69. Chenopodium anthelminticum L, Worm-seed. A fatal case of poisoning from the oil has been reported. 70. Chenopodium ambro.sioides L. Mexican Tea. Goosefoot. Probably has much the same properties as the preceding. 71. Phytolacca decaudra L. Pokeweed. Roots and .seed contain a virulent poison. Poisonous to cattle. 72. Agrostemma githago L. Corn Cockle. (Lychnis githago Lam.) Seeds poisonous to poultry. The seed is some- times mixed with wheat and ground into flour which is injurious. 73. Silene antirrhina L. Sleepy Catchfly. Said to be poison- ous. 74. Saponaria officinalis L. Bouncing Bet. Soapwort. Some- what poisonous. 75. Vaccaria vaccaria (L. ) Britt. Cow Cockle. Seeds probably poisonous to stock. 76. Asimina triloba (L.) Dun. Papaw. Is edible, but a case of severe poisoning from the fruit is recorded. 77. Caltha palustris L. Marsh Marigold. Somewhat poison- ous 78. Helleborus viridis L. Green Hellebore. Plant poisonous. Leaves poisonous to cattle. 79. Actaea rubra (Ait.) Willd. Red Baneberry. Poisonous, although animals usuall}^ do not eat it. Berries poison- ous. 80. Actaea alba (L.) Mill. White Baneberry. Poi.sonous like the last. 81. Cimicifuga racemosa (L.) Nutt. Black Snakeroot. Under- ground part poisonous. Slightly emetic. 82. Delphinium consolida L. Field Larkspur. Poisonous and fatal to cattle. 83. Delphinium ajacis L. Garden Larkspur. Probably pois- onous to stock. Also the two following species: 84. Delphinium urceolatum Jacq. Tall Larkspur. (D. exalta- tum Ait.) 85. Delphinium carolinainum Walt. Carolina Larkspur. (D. azureum Mx.) 86. Delphinium tricorne Mx. Dwarf Larkspur. Fatal to cattle. 87. Aconitum noveboracense Gr. New York Monk's-hood. Leaves, roots, flowers, and seeds poisonous to man, horses and cattle. 34 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 2, 88. Aconitiiin uncinatuni L. Wild Monk's-hood. Poisonous like the i:)receding species. 89. Anemone qninqiiefolia L,. Wind Flower. Poisonous to cattle. 90. Clematis virginiana L. Common Virgin's- bower. Prob- ably somewhat poisonous. Most of the species of Clematis contain an acrid poi.son. 91. Clematis viorna L. Leather Flower. Probably somewhat poisonous. 92. Ranunculus sceleratus L. Cursed Crowfoot. Very pois- onous. Juice acrid and blistering. Poisonous to cattle. 93. Ranunculus acris L. Tall Buttercup. Acrid, poisonous and blistering, inflaming the mouths of cattle. 94. Ranunculus bull)osus L,. Bulbous Buttercup. 95. Ranunculus repens L,. Creeping Buttercup. 96. Ranunculus arvensis L. Corn Crowfoot. The above three species, as well as all other species of Crowfoot, are more or less poisonous. 97. Ficaria ficaria (L.) Karst. Le.sser Celandine. Has a somewhat acrid taste. 98. Berberis aquifolium Pursh. Trailing Mahonia. The ber- ries are injurious to birds. Wliiru eaten fresh they are emetic and cathartic. QQ Podophyllum peltatum L,. May Apple. Roots, stems and leaves drastic and poisonous, but the ripe fruit less so. Leaves when eaten by cows produce injurious milk. The ripe fruit may be eaten in small quantities. 100. Menispermum canadense L. Canada Moonseed. A case is reported of the death of three boys from eating the berries in mistake for grapes, loi. Sassafras sa.ssafras (L.) Karst. Sassafras. The berries are poisonous. Excessive doses of sassafras tea have produced narcotic poisoning. 102. Papaver somniferum L. Opium Poppy. Narcotic and poisonous. Animals killed by eating seeds and seed- pods. T03. Papaver rhoeas L. Red Field Poppy. 104. Papaver dubiuni L. Long Smooth- fruited Poppy. 105. Papaver argemone L. Pale Poppy. All the above more or less narcotic and poisonous. 106. Argemone mexicana L. Mexican Poppy. Poisonous to stock. Seeds narcotic. 107. Sanguinaria canadensis L. Bloodroot. Acrid and some- what ])oisonous. 108. Chelidonium majus L- Celandine. Narcotic and poison- ous. vStock refuse to eat the plant. Dec, 1903.] Poisonous and Other Injurious Plants. 35 109. Drosera rotundifolia L. Round-leaved Sundew. Poison- ous to cattle. no. Seduni acre L. Wall-pepper. Produces inflammation and vesication when applied to the skin. The fresh herl) is emetic and cathartic. 111. Fragaria vesca L. European Wood Strawberrj-. The fruit produces an irritation of the stomach, in some per- sons, which lasts about a day. 112. Sorbus aucuparia L. European Mountain Ash. The ber- ries are poi.sonous to man, but are eaten by some birds. 113. Pyrus communis E. Pear. Horses are reported to have been killed by eating rotten pears. 114. Mains mains (E. ) Britt. Apple. Seeds poisonous. 115. Prunus pennsylvanica E. Wild Red Cherry. Eeaves pois- onous, but less so than the two following species. Kerr nels probably poisonous. 116. Prunus virginiana E. Choke Cherry. Eeaves poi.sonous. Kernels probably poisonous. 117. Prunus serotina Ehrh. Wild Black Cherry. Eeaves very poisonous to cattle, especially the half-wilted leaves. Kernels very poisonous. 118. Amygdalus persica E. Peach. Eeaves and kernels pois- onous. 119. Gymnocladus dioica (E.) Koch. Kentucky Coffee Tree. Eeaves and pulp of the fruit or beans poisonous. Eeaves reported to be used as a fly poison. 120. Baptisia australis (E.) R.Br. Blue Wild Eidigo. Emetic. 121. Baptisia tinctoria (E.) R.Br. Yellow Wild Indigo. Emet- ic. Supposed to be poisonous. 122. Crotalaria sagittalis E. Rattlebox. Eeaves and seeds poisonous to horses and cattle. Poisonous also in ha}'. 123. Eupinus perennis E. Wild Eupine. The seeds are prob- ably poisonous to stock. 124. Melilotus alba Desv. White Sweet Clover. Objectionable in wheat because of the foul odor the seed imparts to flour. 125. Melilotus officinalis (E.) Eam. Yellow Sweet Clover. Said to be poisonous. Al.so imparts a foul odor to flour. 126. Cracca virginiana E. Goats Rue. Used by the Indians as a fish poison. 127. Rol)inia pseudacacia E. Common Eocust. Black Eocust. Roots, leaves and bark very poisonous to man. 128. Robinia viscosa Vent. Clammy Eocust. Underground parts somewhat poi.sonous. 129. Vicia sativa E. Common Vetch. Caution must be ob- served in feeding this plant to pigs. It is not injurious to cows. (To be contitiued.) 36 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 2, ARADIDAE OF OHIO.* Herbert Osborn. The Aradidae are a very interesting group of Hcmipfcra, being adapted by their flattened bodies to hve under the loose bark of stumps and dead timber. The species are many of them quite rare and it seems probable that their numbers have diminished rapidl}- with the deforestation of the region and the destruction and manufacture of the dead timber that constitute their natural habitat. It is of particular interest, therefore, to collect them as carefully as possible since the chance of securing a full knowledge of our local fauna is growing constantly less. Some of the species seem to show a preference for certain kinds of timber and possibly careful stud}- would show some decided predilection; so far, however, little accurate record has been kept of the kind of bark under which they occur. In many cases, no doubt, the determination of the kind of a tree which has become a rotting log or stump is difficult, but reccrds, whenever possible, would have a distinct interest. Neuroctenus simplex Uhler has been taken under the bark of beech at Columbus, but I have specimens from Iowa in a locality where I think the beech does not occur. Mr. Dur}^ has collected a number of species in sifting dead leaves and forest rubbish in fall and winter. Our native species are dark brown or black and have wings nuich reduced in size, the elytra or fore wings covering onl}' the disk of the abdomen. The beak is rather short in .some genera — not reaching beyond hind border of head. Our species so far recognized in the State fall into three genera, Aradi(s, Brachy- ilnnichus and Neuroctenus, but we most probably have representa- tives of Aiieiinis also. These genera are separable as follows: .\. Heinel3tra with distinct veins. a, Prosternuni with distinct sulcus. Beak (exce])t in nit(er) reaching or passing prosterninn. Anu/iis. aa. Presternum without sulcus. l?cak short, not passing hinder edgt of heail. b. Abdouiinal segments without keel l)etween spiracles and lateral uiargin. /Irac/iyr/ivitc/iiis. 1)1). .\1)(l().i.inal segments with a rlislincl keel on marginal s])ace between spiracles and border. XiKiodi-iiiis. A.\. Hemelytra without evident veins. ^liitiinis. Aradus akquaus Say. Atadiis aei/nalis ?,ny. Hetcrop , Uemip. p. 29 (1831). Coll. Writ., I, 352. Stal. Hmiin. Hfiiiip III, p. i3(>. rhler Hull. U. S. Oeog. and Geol. Siir., I, 321. Large, dark fu.scous, with gray spots, joints 2 and 3 of antennae of very nearly equal length, all joints cylindric. IvCngth, 10 mm. * Contributions from the Dcparlincnt of Zoology and ICiitoniology, No. 14. Dec, 1903.] Aradidae of Ohio. 37 Head a trifle longer than wide, anterior process coarsely granulate, pro- notuni widening slightly, anterior margin with irregular denticles. Disk with four rough longitudinal elevations on posterior half and two approximate and still more elevated ridges on anterior half. Elj'tra moderately dilated at base, nearly reaching the tip of abdomen. Abdomen moderately broad, sides subparallel, appearing somewhat cren- ulate. Color dark fuscous with grayish suffused spots on sides of pronotum, base of elytra and connexivum, and indistinct annulations on the legs. This species may be mistaken for crenahis Say as it approaches that species in length and has the margin of the abdomen simi- larly ornamented. It is, however, narrower, the abdomen with sides distinctly fuscous instead of grayish. Say gives the eqtial length of joints 2 and 3 of the antennae as the distinctive charac- ter, but in the specimens in hand I find a slight deviation from an exact equality, the second joint being a trifle longer. Two specimens collected by Prof. Hine at Cincinnati, also a pair collected by Mr. Dtiry at same place. APADUS CRENATUS Say. Aradhs crenains^a.y. Heterop. Heniip. (1831). Coll. Writ. I, 350. Stal p;nutn. Hem. Ill, 137. Osborn. Proc. O. S. A. S. VIII, p. 77. The largest of our native Aradids, the abdomen broad, the margins crenate. Color gra^-ish brown. lyength ii mm. Head slightly longer than broad. Anterior process rather slender, antennae, joints 2 and 3 nearlj- equal, two usually a trifle longer, fourth about two- thirds of three. Pronotum widening anteriorly, anterior margin denticulate, di.sk with subparallel, elevated granulate ridges. Scutellum elongate, trian- gular. Elytra expanded at base, distinctly narrower at apex and occupying only the central disk of the abdomen. Abdomen broad, oval, margin crenate, the posterior lobes roimded behind. Beak reaching the posterior edge of anterior coxae. Color gray, with light grayish or pallid area on the sides of prothorax, base of elytra and occupying a large part of the exposed portion of the dorsal alidominal segments ; beneath gray, the venter suffused with reddish, legs light fuscous with gray annulations. This elegant species seems to be of rare occurence, or, at least, it is rarely taken, though from its color it would seem to be fully as conspicuous as manj^ of the other species. It is longer and broader and the abdomen more dilated than aequalis. The anten- nal joints 2 and 3 " sub-equal," according to Say, are in my specimen in proportion of 5 to 6, the second being the longer. One specimen collected at Columbtis, and I have before me one collected at Cincinnati by Mr. Dury. Aradus robustus UhIvER. Aradiis robustus Uhl. Proc. Best. Soc. Nat. Hi.st. (1871) p. 104 and (i878) p. 419. This species is of a dark gray to blackish color, the antennae ver}' robust. I,ength 5^-6 mm. 38 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 2, The head wide, antennae very robust, joint 2 a little longer than joint 5, about equally thick, 4th joint smaller, shorter than third. Pronotmn rounded on the margin, surface coarsely granulate and with four elevated ridges on the disk, the outer ones not reaching the anterior margin. Scutellum with sides parallel at base. Klytra moderately dilated at base, not reaching end of abdomen. Beak reaching middle of mesosternum. Color dull fuscous or blackish, a ring near the tip of tibiae and the base of the tar- sal joints slightly paler. Wideh' distributed over the United States but has been taken in Ohio only in Columbtts and Cincinnati. Other records place it in Iowa, Canada, Mass., N. J., N. Y., Md.. 111., Wis. and Minn. It is at once separated from other native species with thick antennae b}' the dull fuscous or blackish color. Aradus ornatus Say. Aradiis oi-uattts &B.y. Heterop. Hera. (1831), p. 21. Coll. Writ. I, 352. Bergroth, Proc. Knt. Soc. Wash. II, 332 and 335. Antennae robust, third joint largest, second longest. Rusty brow'u with yellow spots. I,en,gth, male, 5 mm.; female, 6 mm. Head broad, the antennae much swollen, joint one short, two longest "and considerabh- swollen, three about half as long as two and equalh' thick, four smaller. Heak reaching to middle of prosternum. Pronotmn with lateral bor- ders strongly curved, edge roughened but not dentate, disk with distinct rugo.sities and three conspicuous glabrous spots on hind border. Scutellum triangular. Base of elytra strongly dilated. Abdomen reddish with pale margin bordered with black. Genital lobes with a transverse light yellow spot. So far this species has been recorded from Indiana, Pennsj^va- nia, and Cincinnati, Ohio. A handsome species, described in 1831 from Indiana, and for a long time unrecognized, but Bergroth called attention to it a few years ago, his specimen being credited to Pennsylvania. (Montandon collection.) Recently Mr. Dury has collected it at Cincinnati and kindly- placed three excellent specimens of males and, later, one female in my hands for study. (Ohio Naturalist, IV, p. 22.) Aradus duzei Bergroth. Aiadiis duzei Bergroth. Proc. Knt. Soc. Wash. II, p. 333. Resembles omati/s but lacks the poli.shed spots of the hind bor- der of prothorax. Fuscous with light yellowish markings. Length, male, 6 mm.; female, 6.5 mm. Head broad, antennae robu.st but less dilated than in ornatus, joint two longest, three about two-thirds of two, scarcely as thick. Margin of ])rothorax subangulate, the disk with four rough carinae. Klytra dilated at base, barely reaching tip of abdomen, suffused with yel- lowish on basal third, membrane brown, veins concolorous. Dec, 1908.] Aradidae of Ohio. 39 Color brown. First joint, except at the base, tip of scntelluni, marj^in of abdominal segments and legs, 3ello\v. Terguni and disk of venter suffused with rufous. Tliis species has been collected at Westerville by Mr. Jas. G. Sanders, and at Cincinnati by Mr. Clias. Dur}-. It is recorded also for Canada and Pennsylvania by Bergroth, and this attthor stiggests that this species has been mistaken for oniatus and so recorded in some earlier papers. It is a little more slender than that species, the general color more distinctly brown, base of elytra less dilated, and the depres- sions on the pronotum not polished. Aradus duryi n. sp. Broad, sides stibparallel. Brown with ochery markings. An- tennae, joints 2 and 3 nearly equal. Length, female, g mm. Width of abdomen, 4 mm. Head with anterior process much swollen, rounded at apex. Antennae cylindric, joints of nearly equal diameter, first joint short, barely passing lateral spine and much short of anterior process ; two and three almost equal, one side two is slightly longer than three, on the other the reverse. Beak extends to hind border of prosternum. Prothoi-ax broad, lateral angles rounded, anteriorly narrowed; margin reflected, disk with four elevated ridges, the inner ones approximate on anterior half, the outer ones broken before the middle but continued to anterior margin. The carinaeare coarsely granulate, the intercarinal spaces smooth but not polished. Scutellnm elongate triangular, margins raised and a median carina on basal half, the margin at base and central carina granulate. Elytra with basal fourth strongly dilated, membrane broad, widening to broadly round- ing apex, which reaches nearly half wa}- upon the genital lobes. Abdomen oval, broadly rounded behind, the sides subparallel ; genital lobes long, sep- arate, divergent, obliquely subtruncate, the inner angles rounded. Fifth ventral segment as long at margin as on median line, excavated, truncate on median section, sixth segment at middle about one and one-half times longer than fifth, slightly convex and medially notched. Seventh segment half as long as sixth, notched on middle, terminal segment short, subangulate. Color, ashy brown, with lighter areas on base of wings and veins of corium, and darker fuscous marks and veins on membrane. Antennae yel- lowish brown, lightest at base, and terminal joint nearly black. The con- nexiva are brown with posterior border yellowish, and the inner margin of genital lobes of the same color. Beneath rather deeply infuscated, with reddish yellow diffuse spots on the abdomen. The legs yellow with wide fuscous annulations on femur and tibiae, and black tarsal claws. Described from one specimen, female, from Mr. Chas. Diir}-, collected at Cincinnati, May 2, 1902. 40 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 2, This species has the general iaciesoi (//(zri though less widened posteriorly, but it is much larger and differs in color of antennae, joints of pronotal carinae, genital segments and other points. I have named it in honor of Mr. Chas. Dury, who has so gen- erously placed his material in this family at my disposal. Brachyrhynchus lobatUvS, Say. Aiiidits lohatus Say. Heterop. Hem. (1831.) Coll. Writ. I, 334. Brachyi hynrkits lohaiiis Say . Stal. Enutn. Hem. Ill, 145. Elongate, oval. Black, the pronotum lobate with acute emargination on lateral border and production of anterior angle. Length, male, 7.5 mm-8 mm. Head as wide as long, anterior process truncate, not inci.sed ; antennae slender, joint three longest, one, two and four about equal length, each about two-thirds of three. Pronotum as wide as base of abdomen, the lateral margin acutely emar- ginate which, with the projection of the anterior angles, give it a distinctly lobate forju; disk coarsely granulate with four distinct elevated ridges on the anterior half. Originally described from Indiana, this species .seems to be rather rare in collections, and in some cases specimens of gra/iii/a- fiis have stood under its name. It is much larger than that .spe- cies, as stated by Say, and the deeply indented margin of prono- tum .separates from any of the other species. I have a specimen from Florida collected by Mrs. Slosson, and Mr. Dury has sent me an example collected at Cincinnati — both males. Bergroth cites its occurrence in Canada, Penn., Md., Mich., Ind., 111., Mo., Texas and California. Neuroctenus simplex, Uhl. Biachyi hymliHs simplex Uhl. Bull. U. S. Geol. & Oeog. Surv. I, 323. Neuroclcnus sinipJex 'y3)\\. Bergroth Proc. Eut Soc. Wash. II, p. 336. Osboni I'roc. Ohio State .\cad. Sci. VIII, p. 77 (record only). Elongate ovate ; black. Surface finely granulate, elytra while. Length, male, 4.5-5 nun.; female, 6 mm. Head aljotit as broad as long, antennae slender, third joint slightly longer than the others, which are about equal. Pronotum trape/.odial, the lateral margins sloping towards the head from the basal third, surface granulate, without trace of elevated carinae. Abdo- men very flat. Elytra occupying about one-third of donsal surface. Color dark brown or black throughout, except eh-tral membrane, which is white, though sometimes infuscated on central part, and disk of abdomen under the elytra, which is red. Some sjjecimens are less intensely black than the others, but exce])t in immature iudividvals such cases are rare. This seems to be our most abundant .species, having been taken in large numbers at different ])oints in the State, Columbus, Cin- cinnati, Williamsburg and Hanging Rock. Dec, 1903.] Aradidae of Ohio. 4^ It is also widel}' distributed over the country from New Eng- to Cuba, and west to Iowa, Indian Territory and Texas. Uhler says under bark of oak, but it has been taken here under beech bark also. Neuroctenus ovatus, Stal. Mezira ovatus Stal. Stet. Ent. Zeit. XXIII. 339. Neuroctenus ovalus ^taX. Bergroth. Pr. Ent. Soc Wash. II, 336 Broad ovate, larger, broader than simplex. Black. Length, male, 6 mm.; female, 7 mm. Width of abdomen, male, 3 mm.; female, 3.5 mm. Head with anterior process deeply cleft, that is, the lateral lobes extend- ing well beyond tylt;s and not fused. Antennae, joints subeqiial, third slightl}- larger than the others. Pronottim slightly sinuate on lateral mar- gin, anterior margin slightly concave, granulate, without carinae. Sctttellum triangular, basal margin longest Eh'tra with two whitish spots at base of membrane. Male genital segment oval, baoader than long ; female genital segment quadrate, the hind border lobate, lateral lobes divergent. The above description is written for a male and a female col- lected by Mr. Dury at Cincinnati. While there is a slight differ- ence in measurements and in incision of anterior lobe of head as compared with Stal's description, I believe it should be referred to his species. The species was described from Mexico by Stal and has been accredited to North Carolina by Bergroth. The specimens col- lected by Mr. Dury at Cincinnati extends its range to our State. It is similar to simplex except in larger size and broader, more ovate form. Neuroctenus elongatus n.sp. Elongate, narrowing slightly and anteriorl}'. Brown. Length of male, 5.5 mm ; width of abdomen, 2.25 mm. Head with anterior process slender, the apex slightly notched. Antennal joints subeqtial. Pronotum narrowing toward head from near the base, scarcely sinuate. Anterior border slightly concave, surface finely granulate. Scutel- lum triangular, pronotal border slightly longer than the others, a faint median carina, stirface minutely granulate. Elytra narrow, the neuration weak but distinct. Color dark brown, the apical half of the fourth antennal joint rufous ; the elytra have two diffuse yellowish spots at base of membrane, the membrane browni. Abdomen uniformly red-brown. Beneath red-brown. The legs darker. Genital segment, male, broad oval, the posterior margin svibangulate, the lateral lobes small. 42 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 2, This species described from one specimen, male, collected at Cincinnati by Mr. Dury, is nearly the size, slightly larger, than simplex, but it differs in shape, being narrower proportionately, and its color is quite distinct from any specimens of simplex that have come under my observation. It also differs in the carina on the scutellum, the shape of the genital segment, and the smaller lateral lobes. In addition to the species treated above, I have a specimen of larval Aradus from Mr. Dury, which from antennal characters appears to be different from any American species known to me, and it is hoped adult individuals may be secured so that it may be properly characterized. A SUBTERRANEAN ROOT— INFESTING FULGORID CMyndus radicis n. sp.) Herbert Osborn. On May loth of the present year (1903), I found a specimen of Fulgorid in the larval stage occurring upon the roots of several different kinds of plants, Impatiens, nettles and some grasses, in a river bed near the Olentang}' river. The insects occurred in galleries and cavities usually connected with ojDen cracks and about Yj to I ^ inches below the surface, in some cases and on later days, individuals were found attached to roots of plants above ground, but always where they were well protected by drooping or dead leaves or underrubbish of the surface. Frequently two or three larvae were found in the same cavit}-, but seldom more than this, and the cavity was lined with a cottony fibre secreted from the posterior abdominal segment of the body of the insect. The insects were found onl}' in one small area, but dur- ing the two or three weeks in which the specimens were found, adults and nymphs of different stages were taken in some num- bers, so that it has been possible to trace a part of the life history. The adults were evidently all derived from larvae developed in the preceding weeks, and it seems quite certain that the larvae must hatch in early May either from eggs deposited in the spring by hibernating adults or, what is less probable, in the preceding autumn. So far all efforts to find adults or nymphs during the autumn have failed and the status of the insect during that period can only be surmized. There would seem to be abundant time for two broods, that is, for a second generation resulting from the €ggs deposited in June, the individuals of which are usually matured b}^ late summer, but no proof of this has been secured. Actual knowledge of the life history is, therefore, confined to the development of nymphs during May and the occurrence of ima- ^os during the latter part of this month and early June. Dec, 1903.] A Root — Infesting Fulgorid. 43 As the life habits of related species of Mjnidus are unknown, it seems quite possible that others may prove to be subterranean and the rarity of these forms in collections readily accounted for by this protected habit. What appears to be the larva or a pre-pupa stage has a length of two and sixty hundredths mm. and a width of one mm. It is pallid greenish, sutural lines appearing white, and the cottony secretion of the posterior segment of the abdomen scant; the beak extends just beyond the second coxae. The mature nymph or pupa stage has a length of four mm., or, including the cottony secretion, four and one-half mm. and a width of one three-tenths mm. It is mostly of a pale yellow or whitish color ; some indi- viduals appear more decidedly greenish and some dusky or dirt color. There is a well marked median dorsal stripe and fainter Imes laterally, marking the margins of the wing pads. The three terminal segments with the projecting cottony filaments extend one-third the length of the abdomen and when fully extended appear as a wide tuft. The tuft, however, is easily shed and when the abdomen is denuded only very narrow margins of white thread appear around the terminal borders of the segments. The surface of the thorax and abdomen is faintly dusky, contrasting with the white sutural lines. The eyes are red. The body of the segments are dusky with broad sutures yellow, a dusky patch on the thorax and another on the posterior border of the hinder wing pad. The legs are whitish, the beak reaches to the base of the third coxae. The Imago is pallid yellowish green, the front above and on lower border with black. Length, male, 3.5, mm , to tip of elytra 5 mm.; female, 4 mm., to tip of elytra, 5.5 mm. Head wider than long, vertex one and one-half times longer than wide, tapering to apex which is broadly rounded, margins slightly raised, disk slightly raised towards apex. Front much widened towards apex. Lateral keels thin, broad, median keel weaker. Clypeus triangular, keels obtuse. Pronotum short, posterior margin deeply concave. Posterior angles scarcely rounded. Scutellum longer than head and pronotum together acutely angled behind. Keels slightly divergent. Elytral nervures strong and set with minute hairs, slightly setigerous Color greenish or pallid, the vertex unmarked, but the front bears the black spots just beneath the apex of vertex and a band across its apex, either yellowish or infuscated, in some specimens distinctly blackish. The scutellum outside the lateral carinae, and in some cases in posterior portion of intercarinal spaces infuscated, appearing as obscure longitudinal stripes. Elytra hyaline with veins infuscated, a faint stigmal and post-claval spot and the apical portion of whole elytron sometimes slightly smoky. Ovipositor of female black. Male pygofers nearly truncate, a minutemedian process, the styles broadly expanded apically, curving outward but their inner borders touching. 44 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 2, Described from numerous specimens of both sexes collected at Columbus, Ohio, in 1903. This species resembles viridis Ball, but is larger, with more pronounced coloring, especially the black spots of the front. The vertex is less elongate and genitalia different. While the root inhabiting habit is unusual in this family there are, of course, abundant instances in other homopterous families,^ as Aphidse. Membracidae and Cercopidae. NEW SPECIES OF OHIO FULGORIDAE. Herbert Osborn. Phyllodinus Koebklei n. sp. Brac/ivptcroiis, fcuialc. With transverse markings on vertex and front, pronotum except anterior border, all of scutellum, a broad apical margin of the aborted elytra and the first two joints of the tarsus and margin of the pygofer white, with terminal joint of the antennae, base of the legs, most of the coxae and a series of marks on the abdomen, dirty white. Length, 2.7 mm ; width, lYz mm. The head narrower than pronotum, vertex quadrangular, carinae distinct, front with sides parallel; two times longer than wide; median carina distinct and continued to apex, and a faint carina intermediate between median and lateral. Ch'peus longer than width at base, polished black. Pronotum about as long as vertex, anterior border truncate between the eyes, posterior border nearly straight or slightly concave. Scutellum wider than long, a short divergent lateral carina at base, median carina continued to apex. Eh'tra reaching to base of the second abdominal segni' nt ; veins well marked, becoming indistinct, on posterior margin. Legs dilated about as iu nervatus. Color dull black or fuscous black. Vertex with a soiled occipital white margin, a broken polished band just in front of the middle and two quadrate spots just behind the apex. Front black, with short quadrangular bars just beneath the vertex margin. Three interrupted bars across its disk, two spots about the middle of the lateral margin and a band across the apex, yellowish white. Clypeus black, labruni brownish or yellowish. Pronotum w-hite, the anterior margin blackish, the dusky line extending further along the curved carinae. Scutelhun entirely ^white. Ivlytra pitchy black with broad apical margin, narrower at apex of clavus. Abdomen fuscous with a series of dorsal triangular spots, a lateral suffused spot on second abdominal segment, a .series of round spots on first to third segments and longitudinal stripe, one on third, three on fourth, three on fifth, one 1)roken stripe on sixth, and margins of terga yellowish white. Anal style white; legs, yellow- ish brown at base ; femora yellowish brown at ba.se ; the anterior and middle Dec, 1903.] New Species of Ohio Fulgoridae. 45 tibiae, dull black ; hind tibiae, fuscous, indistinctly annulated with yellow- ish; tibial spur and first and second joints of tarsus, j-ellowish white. Third joint of tarsus and claws, black. BrachypteroKS, male. Color as in the female, but the black of €l3'tra and head more intense and white a purer white. I^ength, 2.3 mm. Structural characters of the body as in the female, the difference lying in the size and the intensity of the color marking. The tibiae slightly more dilated. Genitalia. Pj-gofer excavated ventrally ; styles narrow, nearh' parallel, slightly curved dorsally. Macroptcro2ts, inalc. Black with the white bars on the vertex and front and tip of scuteHum faintly white. Length to tip of elytra, 3.2 mm. Head as in brachypterous forms, the carinae of the vertex apparenth- a little stronger. The hind border of pronotuni broadly sinuate. Scutellum larger, broader than in the brachypterous form, with the posterior lateral margins concave. Ehtral neuration strong, veins tuberculate, having short setae. Almost entirely black. Differs from the brachypterous form in not having white on pronotuni and scutellum. \'ertex barely shows traces of white margin, front has the transverse bars and lateral spots distinct, with apical border distinct but narrow ; tip of scutellum is faintly whitish ; the antennae are brownish ; the apex of the first joint, black ; femora, yellowish brown ; anterior and middle tibiae, black ; tip of tibiae and first and second tarsal joints, white ; hind legs mostly brownish ; tips of sj^ines and claws, black. Macroptcroiis, foil ale. Black with margins of vertex in front and tarsal joints white, as in the brachypterous forms. Elytra hyaline with a fuscous spot at vertex of clavus. This form agrees with the macropterous male, except that the hind border of the pronotuni is more broadly whitened. While markings of the vertex more distinct near the apex. The color as a whole somewhat less intensely black. A single specimen of this form, which must evidently be associated with the preced- ing. Described from two brachypterous females, two brach3-2Dter- ous males, and one macropterous male, collected in Columbus, O., by Mr. Albert Koebele, September, 1903- One macropterous female collected in "D. C," May. This is one of the most elegant Delphacids which has 3'et come to light in Ohio fatuia, and I take special p^eastire in dedicating it to my friend, Mr. Albert Koebele, who collected these and a number of other interesting fulgorids here the past summer. It resembles nervatus but differs particularly in the white tar- sal joints and in the extent of the frontal bars, and in the color- ing of the pronotum and i-cutellum. 46 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 2, Phyi^lodinus fuscous n. sp. B)-achypteroHs , fevia/c . Somewhat larger, lighter colored than Koebelei but similarly marked. Length, 3 mm. Head narrower than prothorax ; vertex quadrate, carinae well marked ; front with sides parallel, median carina small with very faint cari- nae about one-third of the distance from the median to the lateral. Clypeus triangular ; median and lateral carina strong ; pronotum as long as vertex ; posterior margin faintly sinuous ; scutellum scarcely longer than pronotum ; median carina becoming obsolete before the apex ; elytra reaching the mid- dle of the first segment. \'eins moderately elevated, becoming obsolete towards apex. Color brownish and fuscous ; markings very similar to those of Koebelei, but those of pronotum white with median anterior portion black. A some- what interrupted band on either side close to the anterior margin and the anterior angles directly beneath the eyes, black. Scutellum white, with an irregular transverse broken band of fuscous-black. Elytra brown, somewhat fuscous ; on costal margin a broad apical band of soiled white. Abdomen mediallv polished brown, laterally fuscous with white markings, quite similar to those of Koebelei. Tibiae moderately dilated. Described from one specimen collected at Columbs in Septem- ber by Mr. Albert Koebele. This may possibly be an extreme variety of Koebelei or the brachypterons female of nervatus, but without sufficient material to connect them definitely it would better stand by itself. It is a large and handsome specimen, but the color markings are much less intense than in Koebelei. Myndus fulvus n.sp. Light orange or yellow-orange, immaculate. Length, to tip of elytra, female, 4.5 mm.; male, 4 mm. Vertex quadrate, carinae indistinct ; front broad, widened to near apex, then narrowing abruptly to clypeus ; lateral carinae of clypeus sharj). Pro- notum .shorter than vertex, hind bordor sinuate ; carinae of scutellum weak. Color uniformly tawn}- or light yellow-orange. The elytra hyaline but tinged with tawny. Tips of spines and tarsal claws black. Male styles long, expanded on apical half, bent at about the middle. Described from four females and two males collected at San- dusky and Castalia, Ohio, in late June and July. Easily recognized by the ])right tawny color and the ab.sence of spots. Dec, 1903.] Notes and News. 47 NEWS AND NOTES. The thirteenth annual meeting of the Ohio State Academy of Science was held at Denison University, Granville, on Nov. 27. A very interesting program was given in the three sessions of the meeting, and some important business was transacted, with a view toward better organization and publication. Prof. E. L. Moseley of Sandusky, was elected President. Important Notice. — By a special arrangement the Ohio Naturalist is sent to members of the Ohio State Academy of Science who are not in arrears for annual dues. Members of the Academy wishing to receive the Naturalist regularly should see that their dues are paid promptly to Prof. Herbert Osborn, the Treasurer of the Academy. The reports of the Academy will be sent from time to time, as heretofore, to members who have not neglected to pay their annual dues for more than a year. During the past summer I have observed fasciation in the following plants which should be added to Miss Riddle's list on p. 348, Ohio Naturalist, Vol. 3 : Cassia marylandica, Viola tricolor. Ambrosia trifida. J. H. S. MEETINGS OF THE BIOLOGICAL CLUB. Orton Hall, October 5, 1903. The Club was called to order by the President, Mr. Morse, and. after the adoption of the minutes of the previous meeting, the regular program was taken up, consisting of reports by the mem- bers upon the work of the summer. Prof. Prosser reported two months spent in the field in the north, central and southern portions of the State. The so-called Huron shale was studied in northern Ohio, and the exposures near Mon- roeville were referred to the Cleveland. The name Huron is not acceptable, having been applied in 1861 to a Michigan forma- tion. The shale along Vermillion river appears to be interlock- ing with the Ohio shale from the south. Exposures of the Prout limestone at the base of the " Huron " were found. In Highland county, at Hillsboro, the Cedarville limestone shows abundant remains of a large Brachiopod shell. Cavities in the rock are filled with asphalt. Mr. Mead reported on some exposures of the Huron studied by him between Sandusky and Rye Beach. He further reported on the fishes and Orthoptera of Cedar Point and vicinity. Seventeen. 48 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 2, species of fish were washed up along the shore, although some of the more common species, for instance, the white fish, were not observed. About twenty-seven or twenty-eight species were found in the orthopterous fauna of Cedar Point. Prof. Schaffner reported on observations made in Kansas. He studied nutation in plants and nectaries outside of floral organs. Plants new to the Kansas list and added by Prof. Schaffner are Bertoroa incana, lyysimachia nununularia and Taraxacum ery- throspermum. To the Ohio list he added Lacinaria punctata. Prof. Osborn reported fourteen mammals in the Cedar Point fauna. Late in the sunnner he collected Hemiptera at Columbus and at Sugar Grove. Prof. Ivandacre reported the addition of forty-six species of Protozoa to the State list, three of which are probably new to science. Prof. Hine reported on collections at Sandusky, and at the Gulf Biological Station, in Louisiana. Prof. Lazenb)^ reported circumference measurements of grow- ing trees. Mr. Morse reported one new snake added to the State list, Val- eria virginica. Mr. Jennings reported work on the flora of Cedar Point. The herbarium of Cedar Point now contains 312 mounted specimens, all collected on the Point. The Committee on Nominations named by the President was as follows: Prof Prosser, Prof. Lazenby, Prof. Davis. Club adjourned to the first Monday evening in November. Orton Hall, November 2, 1903. The program consisted of the address of the retiring President, Mr. Mor.se, which is presented in full in another portion of this i.ssue. Officers were elected for the year as follows : President, O. E. Jennings; Vice President, J. G. Sanders; Secrctarv, E. D. Coberly. E. D. Coberly, Secretary. Starling Medical College^ Corner State and 6th Streets, COLUMBUS, OHIO. ^ ^ MEDICAL AND SURGICAL CLINICS AT FOUR EXCELLENT HOSPITALS. ^ ^ ^ ^ WELL EQUIPPED AND THOROIGH IN EVERY DETAIL. EXCEPTIONAL CLINICAL ADVANTAGES. CURTIS C. HOWARD, M. Sc, Registrar. STARLING LOVING, M. D., LL. D., Dean. DIE STAMPING. PLATE AND LETTER PRESS PRINTING. SPAHIj & GLENN, PRINTERS AND PUBLISHERS, 50 EAST BROAD STREET. COLUMBUS, OHIO. LONG & KILER Universit}^ Supplv Store Corner Eleventh Avenue and High Street, Removei from Main Building, Ohio State University, Books, Drawing Material, Fine Stationery, Etc. Special Orders for Books solicited. A fine line of FOUNTAIN FENS and COLLEGE FINS. Jiineraf ®irecfot0* 1239 to 1241 (n. §tg3 ^freef. CofumBue, (D^to. Photos ^ ^ ^ FROM THE OLiD RELiIABLiE Baker' s\ Art Gallery State and High Sts., ARE THE BEST. \ The Largest, Finest and Best Equipped Gallery in America. IVledieal and Seientifie Books The Second Liapgest Stock in Ohio. The most libeFQl discounts given Public and Private Liibraries. Sold at Wholesale Prices. CATnuoGUE rnrr 1 — —n •^l-l^ > li. S. WElibS, 665 North High Street, COUUJVIBUS, OHIO. Both Telephones. _ Reduced Rates to Teachers. Ohio State Unwetsit}^. Six Colleges well equipped and prepared to present the best methods in modern education. The advantages are offered to both sexes alike. The following list of departments will suggest tlie organization of tlie institution : Agriculture, Agricultural Chemistry, American History and Political Science, Anatomy and Physiology, Architecture and Drawing, Astronomy. Botany, Chemistry, Civil Engineering, Clay Working and Ceramics, Domestic Science, Economics and Sociology, Educa- tion, Electrical Engineering, English Literature, European History, Geology, Germanic Languages and Literatures, Greek, Horticulture and Forestry, Industrial Arts, Latin, Law, Mathematics, Mechanical Engineering, aietallurgy and Mineralogy, Military Science, Mine Engineering, Pharmacy, Philosophy, Physical Educalion, Physics, Rhetoric and English Language, Romance Languages, Veterinary Medicine and Zoology and Entomology. Catalogues will be sent upon application. After examining the catalogue write for specific information to the President Dr. W. O. THOMPSON, Columbus, Ohio. SPECIMENS DESIRED FOR BOTANICAL The large mushrooms. Puff balls and other Fungi; Abnormal MUSEUM. growths and interesting specimens of shrubs and trees. Also herbarium specimens of Algae, Fungi, Mosses and Ferns as well as flowering plants. Address Prof. W. A. KEI.LERMAN, Department of Botany, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. GEOLOGICAL Will exchange Hudson, Corniferous and Carboniferous MUSEUM. fossils. Address Prof. J. A. BowNOCKER, Curator, Geological Museum, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, ZOOLOGICAL Birds, Insects, Reptiles, etc. We wish to make our collec- MUSEUM. tions representative for the fauna of the state and will greatly appreciate all contributions to that end. Address, Prof. HERBERT Osborn, Department Zoology and Entomology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. Ohio State University, Lake Laboratory. Located at Sandusky on Lake Eric. Open to Investigators June 15 to September 15. Laboratory courses of six and eight weeks beginning about July first each year. Write for special circular. Your Laboratory ^ -^ ^^ ^^ C^A €r^ 6r9^ Is it supplied with the latest and most usable appar= atus, and are you drawing your supplies from the most available source? Send us a trial order and notice the difference. Scientific Materials Company MAKERS - - - IMPORTERS 7115: Penn Ave. Pittsburgh, Pa. T^he Ohio ^ACaturalist, PUBLISHED BY The Biological Club of the Ohio Stale Uni a t HR At iS pKenoi d c 5 FU LA D"PC Basi bphenoioi ^ S LTAO DPC HP -« PrespKenoict c T3 O E h LO DFC HR _J O^tii tosp J^enOl« c 5 DTC HR MesetK moi d ^ S LOA DPC G t n mot c( HTM (Sctocf h motd. S DPC Par - o CotO n o' d m LOTA DPC Gpleniai TU LOTA DTC 4 D-ntcr^j s ru 1 LOTA DPC 5 Anqu/nr s FU LOTA -0 DPC ? /nriioulcr ^ s ru ^ LOTA DPC H"RM Malleus M'-.c^Iei's C9Tt(l a^e ^ s T HPM Incus Q-uaciratt s TU LOTA DPC H tjornanoti ia wlttT ^ s T Co/uTne It a LOTA DPC HBM Stapes ^-^v«-4- -li and Webster Counties, especiall}- in the Cheat and Point Mount- ains, with brief outline of the more conspicuous and interesting fungi — several of which are now reported for the first time. Jan., 1904,] Infection Experiments with Species of Rusts. 57 ADDITIONAL INFECTION EXPERIMENTS WITH SPECIES OF RUSTS. W. A. KEr.#■ Is it supplied with the latest and most usable appar= atus, and are you drawing your supplies from the most available source? Send us a trial order and notice the difference, j^i j& Ji j5, ^ Jt Js. Scientific Materials Company MAKERS - - - IMPORTERS 711R Penn Ave. Pittsburgh, Pa. The Ohio 'ih^aturalist, PUBI.ISHED BY The Biological Club of the Ohio State University. Volume IV. MARCH, 1904. No. 5. TABLE OF CONTENTS OSBORN— A Further Coutribution to the Homipterous Fauna of Ohio 99 SCHAFFNER— Ohio Plants with Extra-Floral Xeetaries and Other Glauds 103 OsBORN— Note on Morphology of Certain Clasping Organs in the Pediculidae 107 Mead— A List of the Orthoptera of Ohio 109 Jones— Additional Eeeords of Ohio Birds 112. J. S. IL— Books Received H^^: COBERLY— Meeting of the Biological Club 114 A FURTHER CONTRIBUTION TO THE HEMIPTER= OUS FAUNA OF 0HI05^ Herbert Osborn. A preliminary list of the Hemiptera of Ohio was published in the proceedings of the Academy in 1900 (8th Annual Rept. ), and a short supplementary list in the 9th Annual Report. Since these publications a number of new species have been added and much additional data obtained concerning the distribu- tion of some of the rarer forms hitherto noted. Some of these are of sufficient interest to merit a record at this time, especially as a final report upon the group is 5-et impossible. It is hoped that during the next two years sufficient collections may be made in certain quarters of the State to render possible a monograph of the State fauna in this group. Several members of the Academy have kindly assisted in gathering material and I am especially indebted to Mr. Dur)^, Prof. Wetzstein, Mr. J. G. Sanders, Prof. Hine, Mr. O. H. Swezey and T. \V. Ditto for such help. Mr. Swezej- has secured a number of the Fulgoridae and Mr. Ditto most of the Aphididae included in this list. The Coccidae have been studied exhaustivelj^ b}^ Mr. Sanders, and he has prepared an annotated descriptive list for the State, so I have not introduced detailed records here. Prof. V. M. Webster and Mr. A. F. Burgess published a list of this family (Bull. U. S. Dept. Agriculture), and this list was republished with certain revisions and additions by Mr. Geo. B. King, /f;//. Arrc's, XIV, page 204. Collections at Cincinnati, the south-east portion of the State and in Ashtabula County are especially desired. "Read at the meeting of the Ohio State Academy of Science. loo The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 5, With the previous lists of 321 and 60 species these additions give us a list of 528 species for the State. CICADIDAE. Cicada canicularis Harr. One specimen of this species which is now sepa- rated from the tibicen of Linnaeus. This specimen agrees in size with typical specimens from ]Maine and is I beheve correctly placed here but additional specimens are much desired, The species differs from tibicen in being smaller, about 40 mm. long instead of 50 mm., and the opercles of male are broader than long. MEMBRACIDAE. Publilia nigridorsum Godg. Columbus. Ceresa taurina Fh. Ashtabula. Ceresa brevicornis Fh. Medina (Hine). Ceresa vitulus Fab. Ironton (Hine). Stictocephala lutea Walk. Ironton, Vinton, Hanging Rock, Sugar Grove, Newark. FULGORIDAE. Chlorochara conica Say. Sandusky (Sw^ezey). Cincinnati (Dury). Col- umbus ( Koebele) . Scolops dessicatus Uh. Cincinnati (Dur}'). Hitherto listed for Bellaire onh-. Plndloscelis atra Germ. Alate form, Cincinnati (Dury). ]\Iyndus radicis Osb. On roots of various plants. Columbus. Myndus fulvus Osb. Sandusky and Castalia. Myndus viridis Ball. ? One specimen agreeing closely with this species except in male styles and frontal markings, was collected at Sandusky- by Mr. Swezey. Myndus pictifrons Stal. Collected at Vinton by Prof. Hine. Cixius stigmatus Say. Cincinnaii (Dury). Oliarus humilis Say. Cedar Point, Sandusky. (Swezey) Castalia, Vinton. Oliarus 5-lineatus Say. Cedar Point. Kelisia axialis Van D. Quite common at Columbus September and October 1903 and collected by Mr. Koebele and the writer. Pissonotus aphidiodes Van D. Columbus (Swezey) Koebele? Pissonotus dorsalis \'an D. Columbus (Swezey) June. Phyllodinus Koebelei Osb. September and October 1903. (Koebele.) Phyllodinus fuscus Osb. Cohmibus. Iviburnia Kilmani Van D. Columbus. Newark. (Swezey.) Liburnia pellucida Fieb. Wooster (Webster), Ironton, Columbus, Georges- ville? Liburnia lineatipes Van D. Columbus (Swezey). Iviburnia lutulenta Van D. Abimdant at Columbus, Cedar Point. Liburnia occlu.sa Van D. Columbus (Swezey). Liburnia Gillettei Van D. Newark (Swezey). Liburnia Osborni Van D. ? Columl)US. Liburnin incerta Van D. Newark (SwezejO- Mar., 1904.] Hemipterous Fauna of Ohio. lor CERCOPIDAE. Tomaspis bicincta Say. Cincinnati (Dury). JASSIDAE. Phlepsius decorus O. & B. Severel specimens collected at Columbus by Mr. Albert Koebele. Phlepsius majestus O. & B. A specimen seen while collecting but escaped from net. It is a very active flyer and one of the most difficult Jassids to capture. Thamnotettix lusoria O. & B. Rather plentiful at Columbus in September and October, 1903. Chlorotettex spatulatns O. & B. Columbus, October, 1903. Dicraneura communis Gill. Wooster (F. M. W.). Jimpoasca obtusa Walsh. APHIDIDAE. Phylloxera caryaeren Riley. (Ditto.) Pemphigus rubi Thos. (Ditto. ) Pemphigus populicaulis Fh. (Ditto.) Pemphigus populitransversus Rilej'. Shizoneiira corni Fab. Columbus. (Ditto). Shizoneura Rileyi Thos. On elm. (Ditto). Phyllaphis fagi L. Weed. (Ditto). L,aclinus longistigma Monell, on willow, Columbus. Lachnus platanicola Rile}' . Columbus. Cladobius Smithae Monell, on willow, Columbus. (Ditto.) Cladobius bicolor Oest. Willow. Columbus. (Ditto.) Cladobius flocculosus Weed. Columbus. Chaitophorus negundinis Thos. (Ditto.) Chaitophorus viminalis Monell. (Ditto). Callipterus discolor Monell. (Ditto). Callipterus bellus Walsh. (Ditto). Drepanosiphum acerifolii Thos. (Ditto.) Aphis cornifoliae Fh. Cohunbus, (Ditto.) Aphis maidis Fh. On corn. (Ditto.) Aphis pomi. Previously listed as mali. Aphis Fitchii. Columbus. (Ditto.) Aphis rubicola Oestl. Columbus. (Ditto.) Aphis crataegifolii Fh. (Ditto.) Aphis rumicis L. Columbus. (Ditto.) Aphis prunifoliae Fh. Aphis maculatae Oestl. (Ditto.) Aphis marutae Oestl. Columbus. (Ditto.) Siphocoryne salicis Monell. Columbus. (Ditto.) Myzus rosarum Walk. (Ditto.) Rhopalosiphum berberidis Fh. (Ditto.) Nectarophora cucurbitae Thos. (Ditto.) Nectarophora pisi. The pea aphis. Nectarophora circumflexa Buckton. (Ditto.) I02 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 5^ COCCIDAE. Pseudococcus trifolii Forbes. Saissetia hemisphericum Targ. " pseudonipae Ckll. Pulvinaria innumbei-abilis Rathv. Phenacocceus acericola King. Aspidiotiis ostreaformis Curtis. " Osbornii Sanders. " juglans Conist. Ericoccus azaleae Comst. " glandiliferous Ckll. Gossyparia spuria (Modect). " lataniae Sign. Kermes galliformis Riley. " cyanopliylli Sign. " pubescens Bogue. Chrysomphalus aurantii Mask. " andrei King. Aspidiotus comstocki Johns. " trinotatus Bogue " uvae Comst. Asterolecanium variolosuni (Ratz). " ulmi Johns. Eulecanixuii caryae Fitch. " cydoniae crawii Ckll. " Fletcheri Ckll. Chionaspis americana Johns. " Cockerelli Hunter. " gleditsiae Sand. " Fitchii Sign. " carpae Cooley. " canadense Ckll. " euonymi Comst. " Websterii King. " ortholobis Comst. " tulipifera Cook. Heniichionaspis aspidistrae Sign. " quercitronis Fitch. Diaspis boisduvalii Sign. " :nagnoliaruni Ckll. Parlatoria zizyphus (Lucas). " querifex Fitch. Fiorinia fiorinniae (Targ. ) " prunastri Fonsc. Comstockiella sobalis Comst. Saissetia depressiun Targ. HETEROPTERA. Canthophorus cinctus. Cincinnati. Previously listed for Columbus. Amnestus pusillus Uh. Cincinnati. (Durj', Coll.) Corinielaena Gillettei V. I). Ironton. Mineus strigipes Fab. Columbus. Podisus niaculiventris Say. Spinosus Dall. Generally distributed. Brochymena 4-pustulata Fab. Euschistus tristigmus Say var. Van D. Chariesterus autennator Fab. was noted in various stages on Euphorbia nutans the past summer. Have seen specimens in Cincinnati (Dury, Coll). AlyduB 5-spino.sus Say. Sandusky (H. O.). Cincinnati (Dur}-, Coll.). Corizus hyalinus. Found in various stages on Euphorbia nutans in Sep- tember. Ischuorynchus didynuis Zett. Vinton (Hine). Columbus. Belonochilus ninnenius Say. Columbus. Ischnodemus falicus Say. Cedar Point. Sandusky. Geocoris limbatus Stal. C3'modema tabida Stal. Ironton. Cynuis angustatus Stal. Columbus. Cymus lividus Stal. Castalia. Ligyrocoris constricta Say. Cincinnati (Dury). Ptochiomera nodosa Say. INIicrotoma carbonaria Rossi. Columbus. Salacia pilo.sula Stal. Emblethis arenarius L. Cedar Point. Lygaeus Kalmii. Stal. Cedar Point. Sandusk}-. Aradus aequalis Say. Collected at Cincinnati by Prof. Hine. Mar., 1904.] Extra-Floral Nectaries and Glands. 103 Aradus ornatus Say. Collected by Mr. Dury at Cincinnati. This is an especially interesting addition to our list as the species has been un- known since Say's description in 1831, until a few years ago when Bergroth rediscovered it. I have noted it in the Ohio Naturalist, volume IV, page 22. Aradus Diiryi Osb. Cincinnati, collected by Mr. Dur}-. Aradus Duzei Bergroth. Westerville, J. G. Sanders. Cincinnati (Dury). Brachyrhynchus lobatus Say. Cincinnati by Mr. Dury. Neuroctenus elongatus Osb. Cincinnati (Dury). Neuroctenus ovatus Stal. Cincinnati (Dury). Two species. Previously recorded for Mexico and North Carolina. •Coriscus propinquvis Rent. Columbus. Opsicoetus personatus L. Has been rather frequent in Columbus and Sandusky. Pelogonus americanus Uh. Cedar point. Sandusky.' Ivimnoporus rufoscutellatus Lat. Cedar Point. OHIO PLANTS WITH EXTRA=FLORAL NECTARIES AND OTHER GLANDS.^^ John H. Sch.-vffner. The existence of glands and nectaries outside of the flower or inflorescence has been a subject of much interest to biologists. Delpino, Darwin, Trelease, and many others have given a large amount of information in regard to the occurence and nattire of these organs ; yet much is still obsctire and any one so inclined ma}^ at least obtain considerable pleasure by making observations along this line. A^arious views have been held as to the cau.se and use of extra- floral glands and their secretions. Delpino considered that the power to secrete nectar by any extra-floral organ has been speci- alh' gained in every case for the sake of attracting ants and wasps as a body-gttard, or as defenders of the plant against enemies. Darwin while admitting that this may be the case in some plants ■did not think that all such glands originated in this way. He held that the saccharine matter in nectar was excreted as a waste prodttct of chemical changes in the sap and that this product might then become useful for accomplishing cross-fertilization or for attracting a body-guard, and thtis the nectary would become an object for selection. He cites the case of the leaves of certain trees where a saccharine fltiid, often called honey-dew, is excreted without the aid of special glands. By some, the special use of extra-floral nectar is supposed to be to divert ants and other insects from visiting flowers which they might otherwise injure. Bitt many plants have nectar long before and long after the flowering period. On \'iburnum opulus, for example, nectar is still present and abundantl)^ tised by ants late in October. An- other view has been that certain of these glands act as absorptive ••■Read at the Meeting of the Ohio State Academy of Science. I04 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 5,. cups and surfaces for the absorption of rain and dew. In Euphorbia pulcherrima, commonly cultivated in green houses, there are very large cup-shaped nectar glands, one on the involucre of each cyathium. There are also stipular glands and glands on top of the petiole at the base of the blade. Ants visit the large glands very extensively and one might be inclined to believe that in such cases the foliar glands are guides to the more abundant sweets to be found higher up when the plant is in bloom. In the case of submerged water plants, as for example in certain species of Potamogeton with glands on the leaves, the entire question of a relationship between insects and glands in general is eliminated. Besides nectar there are various other secretions : important among which are those with a digestive function and those of a sticky nature to prevent crawling insects from passing certain parts or for holding them fast while they die and decay. During the past summer, the writer spent some time in study- ing the glands which appear on the blades, petioles, stipules, and other parts of our native and cultivated plants. The mode of occurrence and the character of these organs is quite erratic. A species may have highl}^ developed glands while its near relatives have none whatever. Even on a given individual, some leaves may have the glands while others have none and rarely is the number constant. Very common among plants is the presence of gladular hairs or pubescence, like on Petunia violacea, Martynia louisiana, Polanisia graveolens, Silene virginica, and Cypripedium acaule. Punctate glands in the leaf blade and other parts are also abun- dant as in Xanthoxylum americanum, Polygonum pnnctatum,. Amorpha fruticosa, Hypericum perforatum, and Boebera papposa. The latter has comparativel}- large, yellow, oval glands which are very conspicuous under a hand lens. Various plants also have glutinous leaves especially when >oung, but these will not be considered here. Of plants which have glandular surfaces with digestive secre- tions especially concerned in capturing and ab.sorbing other organ- isms as food, we have the following : 1. Sarracenia purpurea. 6. Utricularia intermedia. 2. Dro-sera rotundifolia. 7. Utricularia minor. 3. Drosera intermedia. S. Utricularia gibba. 4. Utricularia cornuta. 9. Dipsacus sylvestris. 5. Utricularia vul,naris. lo. vSili)liiuui perfoliatum. In this group probably belong such plants like Silene antirrhina with glutinous bands around the stem and Cardinis undulatus, a western species, in which the outer surface of the involucral bracts are very glutinous and catch large numbers of ants which attempt to reach the flowers above, as well as small flying insects. It seems reasonable to suppose that the debris from these decaying Mar., 1904.] Extra-Floral Nectaries and Glands. 105 insects may serve as food to the captor. Some of the Ohio thistles also have glandular involucral bracts. Various plants have gland tipped teeth or serrations, as species of Salix, Populus, Prunus, and other genera. In some plants the stipules have prominent nectar glands or are reduced to nectaries. Other gland- like stipules however do not appear to secrete nectar. Among the genera which contain species with glandular or gland-like stipules, the following may be mentioned : Reseda, Linum, Euphorbia, Isnardia, and Circaea. The more important glands of special interest are those which secrete nectar or those which have attained considerable morpho- logical development. Although it is not easy to make a classifi- cation of extra-floral glands because of the indefiniteness of these structures, an arbitrary arrangement will be given below to indicate in a general wa}- their origin and position. Some of the special types I have not yet found on Ohio plants as for example the pit-like nectar glands on the lower surface of the midribs of the leaves of Gossypium herbaceum and other plants. The fol- lowing types are known to occur in Ohio : 1. Glands which appear on the margin at the base of the blade or on the top or the sides of the petiole and evidently representing highly specialized glandular teeth or serrations ; as in Populus and Amygdalus. 2. Highly developed glands under the lobes or teeth of the blade ; as in Ailanthus. 3. Special patches of tooth-like glands appearing like modified hairs or eruptions either at the upper or lower end of the petiole or at both ; as in Asclepiodora and Asclepias. 4. Patches of pit-like nectaries on the upper side at the lower end of the petiole ; as in Tecoma. 5. Single or few nectaries on the petiole not apparently originating from hairs, serrations, leaflets, or stipules ; as in Cassia and Ricinus. 6. A series of nectaries on the rachis between the successive pairs of leaflets or divisions ; as in Acuan. 7. Glands on the under side of the leaf in the axils of the veins or on the ranchis at the base of the divisions ; as in Catalpa and Pteridium. 8. Glands on the rachis apparently representing modified leaflets or stipels ; as in Sambucus. 9. Glands on the stipules or representing highly modified stipules ; as in Vicia and Circaea. 10. Glands on the calyx or peduncle not showing any evident relation to pollination ; as in Tecoma, Paeonia, and Ricinus. 11. Cjlands on submerged water plants ; as in certain species of Potamogeton which have two glands at the base of the leaf blade. io6 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 5, During the past summer ants were found abundantly on the following plants, working at the nectar and crawling over the leaves and branches : Cassia marylaiidica. Cassia chaniaecrista. Acuan illinoensis. Prunus avium. Amygdalus persica. Teconia radicans. Ricinus coiiimmiis. Viburnum opulus. Some of the foliar glands are also visited by bees and ma}' thus be important in the production of honey, as the large nectariferous glands on the leaves of Catalpa. Kxtra-floral nectaries make an interesting object lesson well suited for advanced nature study and for elementary botan}\ The subject is no less important because the reason for the phenomenon is not so very evident and because the teacher is not able to give a conclusive answer so easily. In winter one ma}- readily obtain material for stud}- by sprouting sweet potatoes (Ipomoea batatas) in a dish with moist sphagum and sawdust. The large foliar glands of the f:rst leaves secrete an abundance of nectar. Below is given a partial list of the native and cultivated Ohio plants with glands, together with numbers referring to the eleven types indicated above. I Pteridium aquilinum, 7. 33 Acuan illinoensis, 6. 2 Potamogeton hillii, 11. 34 Cassia nictitans, 5. 3 " obtusifolius, II. 35 " chaniaecrista, 5. 4 " friesii, 11. 36 " marylandica, 5. 5 " pusilhis, II. 37 Vicia sativa, 9 6 Sporobolus heterolepis, lo. 3« " angustifolia, 9. 7 Populus heterophylla, i. 39 Vigna sinensis, 10. 8 " candicans, i. 40 Ailanthus glandulosa, 2. 9 " ])alsamifera, i. 41 Acalypha ostraefolia, 3(?). lO " dilatata, i. 42 virginica, 31?). II " deltoides, i. 43 " gracilens, 3(?). 12 " grandidentata, i. 44 Ricinus connnunis, 5, 10. 13 " tremuloides, i. 45 I<;uporbia dentata, 9. 14 Salix nigra, i. 46 Impatiens biflora, i. 15 " amygdaloides, i. 47 " aurea, i. i6 " lucida, I. 48 Circaea lutetiana, 9. 17 " fragilis, i. 49 " alpina, 9 i8 " alba, I. 50 Asclepias incarnata, 3. 19 " babylonica, i. 51 " sullivanlii, 3. 20 Crataegu.s coccinea, i . 52 " aniple.xicaulis, 3. 21 " rotundifolia, i. 53 " variegata, 3. 22 " macrantha, i. 54 " syriaca, 3. 23 Prunus armeniaca, i. 55 Ipomoea batatas, 7. 24 " americana, i. 56 Teconia radicans, 4, 10. 25 " pumila, I. 57 Catalpa catalpa, 7. 26 " cerasus, i. 58 " speciosa, 7. 27 " avium, i. 59 Sambucus canadensis, 8, 9. 28 " pennsylvanica, i. 60 " pubens, 8; 9. 29 " mahaleb, i. 61 Viburnum opulus, i, 9. 30 " virginiana, i. 62 " lentago, 1. 31 " serotina, i. 63 Viburnum prunifoliuni, i. 32 Amygdalus persica, i. Mar., 1904.] Clasping Organs in the Pediculidae. 107 NOTE ON MORPHOLOGY OF CERTAIN CLASPING ORGANS IN THE PEDICULIDAE. Herbert Osborn. The results of Parasitism in developing special organs for adherence possess a prominent Morphological interest since these organs exhibit a high degree of specialization which contrasts markedly with the degeneration of other sets of organs. The Pediculidae present a number of instances of such structures which seem not to have been described in detail and the purpose of this note is to call attention to some of them. In Haematopinus urius there is a protractile disk at the distal end of the tibiae, the purpose of which, as suggested in an earlier note, being to press against the hair in opposition to the tarsal claw and thus assist in the hold upon the hair. In the previous description of this structure no attempt was made to explain the apparatus or its movements, but it was mentioned that the disk played back and forth in a pit-like depression of the tibiae, and the examination of balsam mounts of this organ fails to show very clearly the basis of movement. There is a large muscle running through the tibia and forking near the middle of the tibial joint, one part going to the tibial spur, the other passing on to the tarsal joint while from the latter a fiber runs to the base of the protrac- tile disk. This would seem able to retract the organ and com- bined with an elastic frame- work for the protraction would account for the movements. I have been entirely unable to discover any muscle strands which would seem to act for the protraction and beHeve that this may be provided for in the movements of the chitinous wall assisted partiall}' by the flexion of the tarsal joint. The figure shows the distribution of the muscle strands as noted in the majority of specimens examined. In Haematopinus macrocephalus there is a disk-like organ in the same position as in the preceding species, but it differs from the protractile disk in urius in having a convex surface, appar- ently membranous, and within the bulb of the organ maj^ be seen a half dozen strands of muscles, the contraction of which would serve to withdraw the surface membrane. The muscle strand runs from the base of the tibiae to the cup-like depression of the disk, but not having examined this organ ni living specimens the extent of the protraction, if any, is unknown. The musculature of the tibial joint is shown in the accompanyiug figure. In Euhaematopinus abnormis the posterior pair of legs is very greatly modified, so much so that they cannot serve any function as ordinary organs of locomotion, but must be adapted purel}- for clasping, the femur and tibia each possessing expanded disks, the former upon the anterior part of the femur and so arranged that io8 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol.IV, No. 5, it must press against the femur of the middle legs and with them doubtless forms a clasping organ ; the latter, upon the outer face of the tibiae is adjusted to a special structure in the margin of the abdomen and which serves to crowd the inner face of the tibia against the abdominal wall. The claw is a broad, nail-like structure apparently incapable of distinct flexion. Both tibia and femur seem to provide special means of rigidly clasping the hairs of the host animal, and if we bear in mind the subterranean habits of its host, the development of such special organs may be accounted for. Special organs for clasping occur also in the antennae and abdominal brushes of certain species, but these have been men- tioned, perhaps, in sufficient length in other papers. Lower fij^ures : Ilaeiiiatopinus urius. Upper left hand figure : H. macrocephalus. Upper right hand figure : Euhaematopinus abnorniis. Mar., 1904.] A List of the Orthoptera of Ohio. 109 A LIST OF THE ORTHOPTERA OF OHIO.* Chari.es S. Mead. A little over a j-ear ago the writer, at the suggestion of Prof. Herbert Osborn, began to work over the Orthoptera in the Entomological collection at the Ohio State University, with a view of eventually publishing a list of those found in Ohio. During the spring and fall, collecting was done in central Ohio and during the summer in northern Ohio, mostly in the neighborhood of Sandusky. Heretofore, very little work has been done on the grasshoppers of Ohio and nothing published. Very few references are found in the literature to Orthoptera collected in this state. The Orthoptera, in general, reach their adult condition in late summer and early fall, onl}' a few species maturing and dying before the first of August. Some of the species listed below are fairly common in parts of Ohio and others are quite scarce. Syrbula admirabilis (Uhler). This is a southern form with its northern range about the center af Ohio. On September 23 three females were captured at Buckeye Lake. Orphulella speciosa (Scudder). Blatchley reports having captured but a single pair in Indiana, where it is quite scarce. Morse writes of its being common in the New England states. It is fairly plentiful in the vicinity of Columbus and Sandusky. Hippiscus rugosus (Scudder). On September 23, a coral winged form of this species was captured at Buckeye Lake. It agrees with the descriptions of ' ' rugosus ' ' in all particulars except the color of the wings, which are usually lemon or orange. No mention could be found in the literature of a coral winged form. Trimerotropis maritima (Harris) This is a very abundant species on Cedar point, where three well marked color forms occur: a light, ashy red form with the mottling on the tegmina and body indistinct ; a form with the dorsal portion of the tegmina cinnamon red ; and a dark gray form, the last being the most common. Specimens agreeing with "maritima" and " citrina " are present and also so many intermediate forms that it is impossible to draw a line between the two. Both have been included under " maritima " in the state list. Spharagemon wyomingiana (Thomas). Specimens of this species were quite plentiful on Cedar Point in the woods about midway between the laboratory and the steamer landing. They could be captured there nearly any time during the summer, and were found in no other locality, either on the Point or on the mainland. "Contributions from the Department of Zoology and Entomology. Ohio State Uni- versity, No. 16. Read at the meeting of the Ohio State Academj' of Science. no The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 5, Lept3'.sma margitiicollis Serville, lias been recorded only from Florida, South Carolina and central Indiana. A single immature female was captured July ii, 1903, on Cedar Point near Black Channel. Melanoplus viridipes Walsh-Scudder, reported hitherto only from western Indiana and Illinois. A colony of these was found in Highland county and they are fairly common in Franklin county. They are one of our spring locusts, almost never being found after the first of August. Melanoplus blatchleyi Scudder. The range of this grasshopper is west of the Mississppi river, Marion county, Indiana, being the most easterly point from which it has been recorded. During the past summer it was captured in Franklin and Erie counties, Ohio, a single specimen being secured in each, and a careful search failed to reveal any others. Conocephalus palustris Blatchle3^ This species was described from Indiana and has not been reported from any other state. Specimens are in the collection at the State University from Columbus and Castalia. Xiphidium nemorale Scudder. This is another .southern form that is found quite plentiful around Sandusky Ba}-. Xiphidium strictum vScudder. The general range of this insect, as heretofore recorded, is to the west and .southwest ; but it is common in central and northern Ohio. Orchelimum volantum McNeill, has been recorded only from Indiana and Illinois, but two adult .specimens were captured on Cedar Point in August, 1903. Nemobius maculatus Blatchley, reported onh' from Indiana, was captured in several localities in franklin countv, Ohio, this fall. Gryllus americanus Blatchley, a recently described species from Indiana, was found near Georgesville, Franklin county in Maj-. The rest of the species are such as one would expect in the state, from thtir known range in adjacent regions. At present there are 99 species to record for Ohio, distributed among the families as follows : Forficulidae, 2. Acrididae, 33. riiasniidae, i. Locustidae, 29. Blaltidae, 5. Gryllidae, 19. TeUigidae, 10. The following is a list of the species so far collected in Ohio. Those marked with a *, 38 in number, have been found on Cedar Point. FORKICUI.IDy\E. *Forricula aculeata .Scudd. Lalna minor I^. PIIASMIDAE. ^'Diapheroinera femorata Say. Mar., 1904.] A List of the Orthoptera of Ohio. Ill BI^ATTIDAE. Blatta orientalis L. Ischnoptera iilileriana Sauss. Periolaneta americana L. Blatella germanica (L.). *Ischnoptera pennsylvaiiica De G. Nomotettix carinatus Burm. Tettix granulosus Kirb. *Tettix arenosus Burm. ■^Paratettix cucullatus Burm. *Tettigidea parvipennis Morse. TETTIGIDAE. Nomotettix cristatus Morse. Tettix obscurus Hanc. *Tettix ornatus Harris. Tettigidea armata Morse. Tettigidea parvipennis pennata [Morse. ACRIDIDAE. Chloealtis conspersa Harris. Orphulella speciosa (Scudd.). Dichromorpha viridis Scudd. Syrbula admirabilis (Uhler). Arjiliia sulphurea Fab. Cliortophaga viridifasciata De G. Camnula pellucida (Scudd.). Hippiscus rugosus Scudd. Spliaragemon bolH Scudd. Spharagemon w3oniingiana (Tliom). Leptysma marginicollis (Serv). Schistocerca alutacea Harris. Melanoplus luridus Dodge. Melanoplus viridipes W-S. Melarloplus atlanis (Riley). Melanoplus differentialis (Riley). Paroxya hoosieri (Blatchle}-). ^Stenobotlirus curtipennis Harris. Orphulella pelidna Burm. *Tryxalis brevicornis L. *Mecostethus lineatus (Scudd.). Arphia xantlioptera Burm. "■■Encoptolophus sordidus Burm. Hippiscus tuberculatus D. de B. *Dissosteira Carolina L. *Spharagemon collare Scudd. "Trimerotropis maritima Harris. Schistocerca americana Drurj-. Melanoplus gracilis Brunner. Melanoplus scudderi Uhler. *Melanoplus femur-rubrum (DeG.) Melanoplus blatchleyi Scudd. ^Melanoplus bivittatus Briinner. Scudderia curvicauda Stal. Scudderia texeusis Sauss-P. Amblj-corypha rotundifolia Scudd. Microcentrum laurifolium L,. Conocephalus palustris Blatch. Conocephalus nebrasensis Brunner. "Xiphidium brevipenne Scudd. *Xiphidiv:m nigropleura Brunner. Xiphidium fasciatum De G. *Orcheliniuni nigripes Scudd. *Orchelimum delicatum Brunner. Atlanticus dorsalis Burm. Ceutophilus maculatus (Say). Ceutophilus uhleri Scudd. Ceutophilus sp. LOCUSTIDAE. *Scudderia furcata Brunner. *Amblycor3'pha oblongifolia De G. Microcentrum retinerve Brunner. C3'rtophy]lus concavus Harris. *Conocephalus ensiger Harris. *Xiphidium attenuatuni Scudd. Xiphidium strictum Scudd. Xiphidium nemorale Scudd. *Orchelinuun vulgare Harris. *Orchelimum campestre Blatchley, *Orchelimum volantum Mc Neill. Atlanticus pachymerus Burm. Ceutophilus blatchleyi Scudd. Ceutophilus terrestris Scudd. I f 2 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 5, GRYLLIDAE. Gryllotalpa borealis Biirm. Tridactilus apicalis Say. ^Gryllus abbreviatus Serv. Gr3'llus ainericanus Blalchley. Gryllus domesticus L. *Nemobius fasciatus (DeG.). Neniobius canus Scudd. Nemobius exiguiis Scudd. *Nemobiiis carolinus Scudd. Nemobius maculatus Blatchley. Oecauthus auj^ustipeuuis Fitch. Oecantbus bipunctatus De G. ■^^Oecanthus 4-punctatus Beat. Oecantbus niveus De G. Oecantbus latipennis Riley. ^Oecantbus fasciatus Fitcb. *Anaxipha exigua Say. Pbylloscirtus pulchelkis tJbler. [Ohio State University.] ADDITIONAL RECORDS OF OHIO BIRDS. LvNDS Jones. Rev. W. F. Henninger, of Tiffin, reports the following addi- tional records from the collection of the Wj'notis Point Shooting Cltib near Sandusky : Chen hyperborea nivalis, shot in the fall of 1SS6. Olor buccinator, shot in the fall of 1S77. An.ser albifrons gambeli, .shot in the fall of 1877. Oideniia deglandi, a female, shot in the fall of iSSi. A hybrid between Anas obscura (rubripes?) and Anas bochas, killed m the fall of 1878, by Judge E. B. Sadler. Ayth3-a americana, a pure albino, female, captured in the fall of 18S1. Fulica americana, a partial albino, captured in the fall of 1881, by C. J. Clark. Gallinago delicata, a partial albino, capture 1 in the fall of iSSi, by C. J. Clark. Falco jDcregrinus anatum,a male captured in the fall of 1S82, by Col.. Iv. A. Scoville. All of the Ohio ducks were represented in this collection, among them the rare Gadwall, in several specimens. Mr. A. Hall, of Lakewood, informs me that the specimen of Dendroica kirtlandi reported as captured May 3, 1S78, by W. and J. Hall was captured by him.self instead. Mr Hall furnishes me with the following additional records : Himantopus mcxicamis. Black-necked Stilt, one shot at Berea, October 24, 1881. Minnis pol>glottos. Mockingbird, Janitary 5, 1904, singing. He states that this is the sixth specimen which be has reported near Cleveland. It seems probable that the theory of escaped cage birds for these records will have to be al)andoned. I am pleased to report the presence of Pinicola enucleator leu- •cura, Canadian Pine Grosbeak, in some numbers j^ractically all Mar., 1904.] Books Received. 113 along the Lake front. Also the record of two Acanthis linaria, Redpoll, on December 29, 1903. These two northern species are decidedly unusual in northern Ohio. On December 4, 1903, a single Hermit Thrush was found near Brownhelm, Lorain county, and on January i, 1904, a single Vesper Sparrow, at Kishman's Switch on the lake shore. Mr. R. J. Tozer informs me that there is a large Crow roost in Lake View Cemetery, Cleveland, where hundreds of Crows remained all winter long. In Lorain county there have been many more Crows present during the present winter than ever before. [Oberlin, Ohio.] BOOKS RECEIVED. Two volumes have recently come to hand from the pen of W. S. Blatchley, State Geologist of Lidiana. ' ' Gleanings from Nature ' ' is published by the Nature Publish- ing Company of Indianapolis and is dedicated to the 800,000 boj-s and girls of the state of Indiana. The author writes in a popular way from personal observations on birds, snakes, fishes, flowers, insects, weeds, swamps and caves and treats them in an interesting and instructive manner, giving the information the 3'outh especially is always desirous of knowing. Since we have read the book and compared the plants and animals mentioned with the flora and fauna of Ohio we find that almost without exception the forms treated are common to the two states, therefore, although it is wTitten with special reference to the natural history of Indiana, it is almost as valuable for Ohio and doubtless for a number of other states. "The Orthoptera of Indiana" is a reprint from the 27th Annual Report of the Department of Geology and Natural Resources of the state of Indiana. The glossary and chapter on anatomy are features which add greatly to its usefulness as by this means the characters used in the keys and descriptions are" made plain. One hundred and forty-eight species are given as occurring in Indiana, with full descriptions, and keys for determining each species. We find this work very appro^Driate for determining our Ohio Orthoptera and already we have recognized nearly a hundred of the forms given in it for Indiana. Students of the group cannot afford to be without a copy and students in general Entomology will find it valuable. J. S. H. 114 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 5, MEETING OF THE BIOLOGICAL CLUB. Orton Hall, February i, 1904. The meeting was called to order by the President, Mr. Sanders, and the minutes of the previous meeting read and approved. The paper of the evening was given by Professor Minnie A. Stoner of the Domestic Science Department. She outlined the work in Domestic Science as given by the University, both in the long and short courses and made mention of several improvements contemplated, especially along the line of research work. She also gave a short history of Domestic Science courses in the United States and told in brief of the work which is going for- ward in the various public and private institutions of this country in which such departments are established. Professor Kellerman gave his ideas upon industrial courses in various schools, and Domestic Science courses in particular think- ing that they should to be expanded. Mr. Sanders gave a short biographical sketch of Linnaeus after which Dr. Kellerman, Professor Osborn and Professor Schaffner discussed the work of Linnaeus as a systematist. Under current literature. Professor Osborn presented a recent publication from the Biological laboratory of the University of Illinois on the Plankton in the Illinois river. Professor Keller- man reported that no flowers of anj^ kind had been observed in bloom during January of this year. Mr. Morse announced the lecture by Dr. David Star Jordan at the First Congregational Church on February 16th, under the auspices of the Philosophical Club. The Club adjourned to the first Monday evening in March. E. D. CoBERLY, Sccreta)y. Date of Publication of March Number, March 10, 1904. THE WILSON BULLETIN A Quarterly Journal Devoted to The Study) of Living Birds, The Official Organ of the Wilson Ornithological Chapter of the Agassiz Association. ITS AIM is to stimulate the study of living birds by the publication of field work done by members of the Chapter. This work is planned to contribute to one end and is, there- fore, cumulative. The June number will contain a winter census of the birds of Lorain County, Ohio, besides other matter of general interest and value. Each number contains not less than forty pages of matter of interest to the student of birds. If you are interested in bird study at first hand, and wish to learn how others are studying, you will not miss seeing a copy of this up-to-date bird magazine. Write for a Free Sample Copy to LYNDS JONES, Oberlin, O. CedatTf Point bake Liaboi^atoi^y. Offers Exceptional Opportunities for Study or Investigation During the Summer Months. THE laboratory is located on a beautiful site on Cedar Point near Sandusky giving convenient access to Lake Erie, to the marshes of Sandusky Bay, the river, islands, beach, forest and prairies, affording great variety of plant and animal life. Students are granted free trans- portation on the steamers of The Cedar Point Company. INSTRUCTION is offered in General Zoology, Botany, Entomology, Embryology, Icthyology, Ornithology, Plant Ecology, Morphology and Advanced Laboratory or Research Courses. FEES for the season are twenty dollars. EQUIPMENT includes tables, aquaria, dark room, boats^ dredges and collecting apparatus. Microscopes and other instruments are supplied from the university. INVESTIGATION. Properly qualified persons are given free opportunity for independent investigation. INSTRUCTORS. The staff includes regular members of the instruc- tion staff of the university. CREDITS given university students for courses completed. LECTURE AND LABORATORY COURSES BEGIN JUNE 27, 1904. For further information or special cii-cular, address Pres. W. 0. Thompson, or Herbert Osborn, Director Lake Laporatory, Ohio State Lniversity, Columbus, Ohio. "PSYCHB" JOURNAL OF THE CAMBRIDGE ENTOMOLOGICAL CLUB. The Oldest Entomological Magazine Published in the United States. New- Editorial Staff. New England Entomology a Special Feature. Department of Bibliography, Exchange Column, etc. Issued Bi-monthly February to December. Price Reduced to ONE DOLLAR per Year. All correspondence should be addressed to CA.MBRIDGE ENTOMOLOGICAL CLUB, Care Boston Society of Natural History, 234 BERKELEY STREET, BOSTON, MASS. Ohio State Academy of Science Publications. First Report, and First and Second Annual Reports Price 25 cts. each Third and Fourth Annual Reports Price 20 cts. each Fifth to Eleventh Annual Reports Price 15 cts. each Special Papers— No. i. " Sandusky Flora." pp. 167. By E. L. MoSEivEY Price 35 cts. Special Papers— No. 2. "The Odonata of Ohio." pp. 116. By David S. Kellicott Price 35 cts. Special Papers— No. 3. "The Preglacial Drainage of Ohio." pp. 75. By W. G. Tight, J. A. Bownockkr, J. H. Todd and Gerard Fowke Price 35 cts. Special Papers — No. 4. "The Fishes of Ohio." pp. 105. By Raymond C. Osburn Price 35 cts. Special Papers— No. 5. " Tabanidae of Ohio." pp. 63. By James S. Hine Price 35 cts. Special Papers— No. 6. "The Birds of Ohio." pp. 241. By Lynds Jones : . Price 50 cts. Special Papers— No. 7. "Ecological Study of Big Spring Prairie." pp. 96. By Thojias A. Bonser Price 35 cts. Address: W. C. MILLS, Librarian, Ohio State Academy of Science, Page Hall, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. Every One of Oar Adl^ertisers Are Strictly Reliable People and if you Want Anything in their Line, it Will Pay You to Consult Them. Please Mention The QHIO NATURALIST ^" Voting. Ohio State Unwetsity. Six Colleges well equipped and prepared to present the best methods in modern education are offered to both sexes alike. The advantages The following list of departments will suggest the organization of the institution: Agriculture, Agricultural Chemistry, American History and Political Science, Anatomy and Physiology, Architecture and Drawing, Astronomy. Botany, Chemistry, Civil Engineering, Clay Working and Ceramics, Domestic Science, Economics and Sociology, Educa- tion, Electrical Engineering, English Literature, European History, Geology, Germanic Languages and Literatures, Greek, Horticulture and Forestry, Industrial Arts, Latin, Law, Mathematics, Mechanical Engineering, Metallurgy and INIineralogy, Military Science, Mine Engineering, Pharmacy, Philosophy, Physical Educalion, Physics, Rhetoric and English Language, Romance Languages, Veterinary Medicine and Zoology and Entomology. Catalogues will be sent upon application. After examining the catalogue write for specific information to the President Dr. W. O. THOMPSON, Columbus, Ohio. SPECIMENS DESIRED FOR BOTANICAL The large mushrooms, Puffballs and other Fungi; Abnormal MUSEUM. growths and interesting specimens of shrubs and trees. Also herbarium specimens of Algae, Fungi, Mosses and Ferns as well as flowering plants. Address Prof. W. A. KellERMAN, Department of Botany, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. GEOLOGICAL Will exchange Hudson, Corniferous and Carboniferous MUSEUM. fossils. Address Prof. J. A. BowNOCKER, Curator, Geological Museum, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, ZOOLOGICAL Birds, Insects, Reptiles, etc. We wish to make our collec- MUSEUM. tions representative for the fauna of the state and will greatly appreciate all contributions to that end. Address, Prof. Herbert Osborn, Department Zoology and Entomology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. Ohio State University, Lake Laboratory. Located at Sandusky on Lake Erie. Open to Investigators June J 5 to September 15. Laboratory courses of six and eight weeks beginning about July first each year. Write for special circular. Your Laboratory ss. s. s. Is it supplied with the latest and most usable appar= atus, and are you drawing your supplies from the most available source? Send us a trial order and notice the difference. ± ± Jk ^ ± ^ ± SE isstiS**' MICROSCOPES From the Simplest to the Most Complete. For Stiulonts, Physicians and Specialists. Full Guarantee witli every Instrument. .■^':^ MAGNIFIERS Folding Pocket Magnifier 20 40 Tripod Magnifier, adjiLStable .50 Hand Magnifier, metal case 1 00 Folding Magnifier, metal case 1 25 Hasting's Aplanatic Triplet V 00 DISSECTING MICROSCOPES T 1 3.2.50 W 1 $ 9.75 U 1 6.75 Y 1 25.75 COMPOUND MICROSCOPES Ali 1 $21). 00 liB 4 «• 55 00 li 1 35.00 BB 8 100.00 B 2 40.00 ('A 8 127.00 BA 2 45.00 DD 8 207 00 WRITE FOR DISCOUNTS CATALOGUE On Request f"' \ -E Scientific Materials Company MAKERS = = = IMPORTERS 711^ Penn Ave. Pittsburgh, Pa. ne Ohio ^]\Caturalist, PUBLISHED BY The Biological Club of the Ohio State Uni'versity, Volume IV. APRIL, 1904. No. 6. TABLE OF CONTENTS Cook— Galls and Insects Producing Them 115 Cook— Galls and Insects Producing Them. Appi-ndix 1 140 News and Notes 1 ■IS GALLS AND INSECTS PRODUCING THEM.^ Melville Thurston Cook. Part VI. Flower and Fruit Galls. Galls affecting flowers and fruits are not so abundant as those affecting leaves, but in many cases the insect which produces flower or fruit galls also produces leaf galls. No sharp line of distinction can be drawn between flower and fruit galls, since the gall ma}' form and mature without indication of fruit or may form in the flower and mature as the fruit develops. Thus far I have collected five species of flower and fruit galls representing three orders of insects. I. GALLS OF THE ACARINA. Phytoptus sp. — on Euphorbia corallata L. (Figures 70 ; 71a, b ; 72a, b). This mite produces galls on both leaf and flower. The structure of the gall is the same in both cases and is identi- cal with Phytoptus galls, previously described in Part I, (Figures 811). All my specimens of this gall were well advanced. The structure of the leaf of E. corallata ( Fig. 70) is typical. When attacked by the Phytoptus the leaf becomes very much modified by thickenings, ridges and convolutions (Figures 71a, b). The palisade cells divide so that it is impossible to distinguish them from the mesophyll, and the intercellular spaces are obliterated as the result of the rapid cell division. The new cells are small and very rich in protoplasm, but gradually become filled with tannin as the gall approaches maturit)-. The tannin first forms in the outer and most exposed cells of the gall while the inner laj'ers of cells retain their protoplasm very late. The Phj'toptus restricts its attacks to these inner and more protected parts. From a study of these galls it is apparent that the Phytoptus is not working on * Contributions from the Department of Zoology and Entomology, Ohio State Univer- sity, under the direction of Prof. Herbert Osborn, No. 17. ii6 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 6, all parts of the gall at the same time, but gradually moves out- ward over the surface of the leaf, thus increasing the size of the gall and drawing its food supply from the newer part thus formed. When the attack is made upon the flower we have a mass of distorted tissue which is structurally the same as that produced in the leaf gall (Figures 72a, b). The floral envelopes are the first to suffer from the attack, the ovar}' with its contents is the next greatest sufferer, while the stamens are frequently unaffected. It is evident that the attack upon the flower must be made very early in order to cause complete destruction. Very frequently the floral envelopes will be very much deformed and the ovary and the stamens ver}^ slightly affected. In other cases the ovary will be very much enlarged and its chambers practically obliter- ated. It is evident that the attack upon the ovary must be made very early to produce a great deformity. The partial immunitj' of the stamens is probably due to their being very nearly mature before the opening of the bud. 2. GAI^LS OF CECIDOMYIA. Cecidomyia anthophila O. S. — on Solidago canadense L. (Figs. 73a, b), makes the attack early and completely prevents the open- ing of the bud. The gall is in the form of a hollow cone. The transformation is so complete that the location is the onl}- evidence that the gall is produced from a flower bud. A section of the gall shows the nutrient layers of the cells next to the larval chambers, large parench^^ma cells near the outer epidermis, and a number of rather weak fibro- vascular bundles. Cecidomyia sp. — on Ratibida pinnata Barnhart (Figs. 74a, b, c). The entire bud is transformed into a gall with the larva in a chamber in what was originally the ovary. All the floral parts have become modified and united to form the gall. A section of the gall (Fig. 74c) shows that the cells are more uniform in size than in the preceding galls and that the fibro-vascular bundles are practically obliterated. Cecidomyia sp. — on Prunus virginiana ly. (Figs. 75a, b). My specimens of this gall were mature. I am unable to say at what time the gall originates, but it reaches its maturity with the fruit. The gall is somewhat larger than the fruit, but otherwise resem- bles it closely. The larva makes its exit through an opening at one side of the stem. The larval chamber is very large, thus giving the gall a l^ladder-like character. The cuticle is well developed and the parenchyma cells below it are ver}' large, while the cells next to the larval chamber are much smaller. Weak flbro-va.scular bundles are ahso present. The wall of the gall (Fig. 75b) is much thicker than the wall of the fruit at this time (Fig. 75a), and parenchyma cells are much larger. The charac- teristic stone (sclerenchyma) of the fruit is never developed in the gall. April, 1904.] Galls and Insects Producing Them. 117 3. GALLS OF LEPIDOPTERA. I gathered a number of L,epidopterous galls on Rudbecki& laciniata L,. which I was unable to determine. These galls occur on both leaf and flower and are very large and fleshy. In fact they were so fleshy and juicy that it was very difficult to secure sections. The parenchyma cells were very large, and small fibro- vascular bundles were numerous. The larval chambers were numerous and each contained a single larva or pupa. In my specimens the larvae were far advanced, many of them in the pupa stage, but the cells next to the chambers were very rich in food supply. Part VII. Root Galls. Amphibolips radicola Ashm. (Figs. 76a, b). — on Quercus alba Iv. was the only root gall that I collected. The galls were borne just under the surface of the ground at about the point of transi- tion from stem to root. They were produced in great numbers and so closely packed together as to assume the shape of figs. Those nearest the surface of the ground and therefore slightly expo.sed to the light were of a rich, red color, while those deeper in the ground were almost white, slightl}^ tinged with yellow. Kach gall contained from one to five larval chambers. The younger galls showed four zones well defined (Fig. 76a). The inner or nutritive zone was thick and the cells contained abund- ance of protoplasm. The protective zone was thin and the cells fibrous in character rather than sclerenchymatous. The paren- chyma zone was thick and composed of large parenchyma cells. The epidermal zone was relatively thick and the cells firm. As the insects approach maturity the nutritive and protective zones are entirely destroyed (Fig. 76b). The insect eventually makes its escape through an opening in the side of the gall. Part VIII. Histology of Galls. Man}' of the histological characters of galls have been referred to in the preceding parts. This part has been introduced at this time for the purpose of adding a few additional facts which were not clear at the time of the writing of the preceding parts. A. Internal Stttictures. I. GALLS OF ACARINA. These galls have been sufficientl}' discussed and need very little attention at this time. In general these galls may be thrown into three groups : (i) Those galls in which there is very little distortion, but a modification of the epidermis, as in the case of the Phytoptus on the beech ; (2) Convolutions of the parts as in the case of P. ulmi (Fig. 8), P. abnormis (Figs. 9, 44), P. quad- ii8 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 6, ripes (Figs. lo, 43), and P. acericola (Figs. 11, 45). These con- volutions result in the formation of a more or less well defined cavity, and trichomes are developed in great abundance in the younger stages ; (3) Thickening of the parts which become cov- ered with an abundant growth of trichomes as in the case of E. anomalum (Figs. 47, 48). The Phytoptus galls show two fairly well-defined zones, the outer made up of rather large cells and the inner of much smaller cells, which are very rich in protoplasm and which supply nour- ishment for the young animal (Fig. 77). As the galls approach maturity the protoplasm disappears, first from the outermost cells and lastl}^ from the cells on the inner surface. As the protoplasm disappears the tannin accumulates in great abundance (Fig. 78). 2. GALLS OF THE APHIDIDAE. Man}' of the Aphididae galls produce trichomes which soon disappear. At first all the cells contain protoplasm and divide rapid!}', but as the galls approach maturity the tannin increases in abundance. Schizoneura americana Riley (Fig. 12), Colopha ulmicola Fitch (Fig. 13), and Hormaphis hamamelis Fitch (Fig. 15) have been considered in Part I. In Pemphigus populi-transversus (Figs. 55, 56) and P. p.-caulis (Figs. 57, 58) the thickness of the walls of the galls is much greater than an}- other members of this family and the cells are more uniform in character. These galls are especially well sup- plied with fibro-vasular bundles and are very dense. In P. vagabundus (Fig. 112) we have a gall in which many of the cells are elongated similar to C. ulmicola and H. hamamelis. Its close structural resemblance to C. ulmicola and H. hamamelis and unlikeness to P. p.-transversus and P. p.-caulis is due to the fact that P. vagabundus, C. ulmicola, and H. hamamelis are formed on the blades of the leaves, while P. p.-transversus and P. p.-caulis are formed on the petioles which are made up largely of fibro-vascular tissue. My specimens of these galls were mature, and I am therefore unable to say anything concerning their early stages. In the Phylloxera galls all tl e cells are at first rich in pro- toplasm and the tannin does not form in abundance until very late. The two zones are fairly prominent. In P. c.-caulus Fitch on H. ovata, a gall which forms on both blade and petiole of the leaf and also on young stems large intercellular .spaces are formed near the surface. 3. (iALL.S 01* PSVLLIDAE. Pachypsylla c. -mamma Riley has been described in Part V (Figs. 59, 60). April, 1904,] Galls and Insects Producing Them. 119 4. GAI.LS OF cecido:myia. These galls have been described in Part I (Figs. 22, 23, 24), in Part V (Figs. 61, 62, 63), in Part VI (Figs. 73, 74, 75), and in the Appendix (Figs. 114-119). In these galls the two zones are usually fairly well defined, but the galls of this genus are so different in character that it is difficult to give a definite descrip- tion. The time for the formation of the tannin is variable, but it is usually produced late and in great abundance. 5. GALLS OF THE CYNIPIDAE. All these galls are very similar. The majority show the four zones and in most cases these zones are well defined. The outer zone is the epidermal which will be described later (Figs. 84-91). The second is the parench5aiia zone ; the third is the protective zone made up largely of sclerenchyma, and the fourth or inner- most is the nutritive zone. In many cases the second and third zones become partially or entirely separated. This separation, however, is not between the second and third zones as previously stated by me in Parts I and V, and by Fockeu, but rather a sep- aration of the tissues of the second or parenchjana zone, the greater part of this zone clinging to the epidermal zone and a few cells remaining attached to the protective zone. Diastrophus siminis Bassett (Figs. 66-69) has been described in Part V. The four zones are distinct and each shows the char- acter previousl}^ referred to. Diastrophus nebulosus O. S., described in the Appendix (Figs. 129a, b), is a stem gall in which the zones are well defined, the protective zone being especiall}^ well developed. Each zone shows the characters previously referred to. In Amphibolips confluentus Harris (Figs. 121a, b, c) the first and second zones are well developed, but the distinction between the third and fourth is not so pronounced. In Amphibolips inanis O. S. (Fig. 28) the four zones are well defined. In the young gall (Fig. 79) the cells of the nutritive zones are very rich in protoplasm and there is ver}" little or no distinction between the nutritive and the protective zone, but as the galls approach maturitj" the cells of the protective zone become very thick and are soon converted into sclerenchyma (Fig. 80). In Callirhytis papillatus O. S. we have the four zones well defined (Fig. 30). As the' gall approaches maturity the cells of the nutritive zone lose their protoplasmic contents and become very much shriveled, the protective zone is made up usually of only two or three layers of cells. Next to the protective zone are two or three layers of cells which are in realit)' a part of the parenchyma zone. The large intercellular spaces formed in this I20 The Ohio Naturalist [Vol. IV, No. 6, zone are bridged by long unicellular threads, but no fibro-vascular bundles (Fig. Si) Dr3'ophanta palustris O. S. galls show the four zones well defined (Figs. 29, 65). When mature the contents of the cells of the nutritive zone has been entirel}- used b}' the insect. The protective zone consists of onl}- two or three layers of sclerenchyma cells, to which are attached a few cells of the parenchyma zone (Fig. 82). Andricus petiolicola Bassett (Fig. 124) produce a very hard petiole or mid-rib gall which shows the four zones well defined. There is no separation between the second and third zones. The nutritive zone is at first very prominent, but it is reduced as the gall approaches maturity. The protective zone developes its sclerenchyma character rather late (Fig. 83) and gradually merges into the two adjacent zones. B. Epidenual Stnictitres. The epidermal cells vary in the size and in the thickness of the cell walls. The galls may be smooth, pubescent or covered with spiny structures. The amount of pubescence depends somewhat on the natural pubesence of the host plant. Galls on such smooth plants as Populus deltoides Marsh show ver}- few and very small trichomes, while galls on plants that are naturall}- pubescent are likely to be pubescent. These trichomes vary in shape and gen- eral character and are very prominent when the gall is young. As the gall approaches maturity the trichomes usually disappear. When these trichomes drop off their place of former attachment is marked by a small mass of small cells, usually containing tannin and from which imperfect rows of cells seem to radiate (Figs. 84-90). I. GALLS OF CYNIPIDAE. Dryophanta palustris O. S. is very pubescent when young (Fig. S4a). In the mature gall the cells are much larger, the trichomes have disappeared and their point of attachment is made visible by the accumulation of tannin (Fig. S4b). All my .specimens of Amphibolips inanis O. S. were fully developed, but the points where the trichomes had evidently been attached were very prominent (Fig. 85 ). These points are the large, black spots so prominent on these large bladder}^ galls. In Diastrophus siniinis Bassett the trichomes are very large (Fig. 86) and drop off very readily. In Diastrophus potentillae Bas.sett the trichomes are very numerous and each is at the apex of a \-cry small elevation (Fig. 87). Examination of the epidermis of Acraspis crinacei Walsh show that its spines were due to similar but much more prominent elevations. April, 1904.] Galls and Insects Producing Them. 121 2. GALLS OF THE APHIDIDAE. Galls belonging to this family nre usually less pubescent than those belonging to the Cynipidae. The trichomes are usually much shorter and frequently less numerous. Each trichome is usually made up of a single cell (Fig. 88). The place where these trichomes were attached is marked b}- an accumulation of tannin, the .same as in the Cynipidous galls (Figs. 89, 90). Examination of the galls of the Phylloxera spinosa Shimer show that the spines were due to the same cause as in the Cynipidous galls (Fig. 87). Galls of Pemphigus p.-transversus Riley (Fig. 91) and P. p.- caulis Fitch were perfectly smooth, but the cell walls were much thicker than in any other galls studied. CONCLUSION. 1. The inner layer of cells (i. e., those next to the larva) are always supplied with nutriment until the insect is mature. 2. The development of the other layers of cells is for the pro- tection of the larvae. These protective devices reach their highest development in the Cynipidous galls. 3. In the very young galls there is usually little or no distinc- tion between the nutritive and protective zones. The time of the differentiation of the protective zones varies in different species. 4. The fibro-vascular bundles are most prominent in galls on the petiole and mid-rib. 5. Most galls are covered with trichomes which disappear as the galls approach maturity. The number of trichomes is varia- ble in proportion to the pubescence of the host plant. 6. Spines are due to elevations composed almost entirely of epidermal cells. Part IX. Ovipositors and Mouthparts. One of the most prominent questions concerning the formation of galls which presents itself to the students of entomology and botany and even to the most casual observer, is the exciting factor in gall production. Is the stimulus from the ovipositor or mouth- parts ? Is it mechanical or chemical ? The author believing that the logical method of solving this problem was to first make a careful study of the morphology and development of galls has published the preceding parts of this paper. The author does not claim to have found a complete solution of the problem, but is hopeful that some of the facts stated in this series of papers may lead to more thorough and satisfactorj' studies of the prob- lem. The problem presents many difficulties ; the parasites and inquilines which are usually present are frequently difficult to distinguish from the real gall-maker ; this is especially true when the study is confined to the larvae. In the following studies the author is reasonably certain that the determinations are correct. 122 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 6, OVIPOSITORS. Gall-making insects deposit their eggs by two methods, either on the surface of the plant or within the tissues. Those insects which deposit their eggs on the surface usually have mouthparts developed for sucking, while those which deposit their eggs within the tissues usuall}- have mouthparts developed for biting. Those which deposit their eggs on the surface of the plant are the Acarina, the Hemiptera, and the Diptera. Those which deposit their eggs within the tissues are the Hymenoptera and the Lepidoptera. In this paper we have made a careful study of the ovipositors of Cecidomyia gleditsiae, of Nematus sp , Drj^- ophanta palustris, Amphibolips radicola, Andricus cornigerous, A. semiuator, and Rhodites radicum. A number of others were examined, but because of the uncertainty as to determination are not figured. The Cecidomyia ovipositor (Fig. 92 J is not suited to punctur- ing tissues. The gall is never formed until after the hatching of the larva. In this case it is evident that the stimulus, whether mechanical or chemical, is produced by the larva. Insects belonging to the genus Nematus deposit their eggs either on the surface of the plant or in slits made by the ovipositor (Figs. 93a, b). It is said that the galls are formed from these wounds before the larva escapes from the egg, and in these cases it is claimed that the irritating cause is a drop of fluid secreted by the parent insect. Westwood claims that the egg increasing in size is a result of imbibing sap from the wound in the plant. It is well known that the eggs of some insects increase in size as a result of the growth of the embr3'o within the egg. I have so far been unable to make any satisfactory observations upon the Nematus galls, but it is probable that the eggs increase in size from the growth of the embryos and not as a result of the absorp- tion of plant sap. It is also possible that the gall may be the result of the mechanical irritation of the ovipositor or the enlarge- ment of the egg or both. The wound caused by the ovipositor of the Nematus is very much more severe than the woiuids caused by the ovipositors of the Cynipidous insects. Adler, after a careful observation on Nematus Vallisnierii, says: "This fly, which is armed with a finely serrated terebra, cuts into the tender leaves of the end of the shoot of the Salix amyg- dalina, and inserts her egg into the open wound, frequently plac- ing several in the same leaf. At the same time the glandular .secretion flows into the wounded leaf. A few hours after this injury the leaf surface presents an altered appearance, and new cell formation begins freely, leading to a thickening of the sur- rounding leaf surface. After the lapse of about fourteen days the green and red-.'^haped gall is fully grown. If it be now April, 1904.] Galls and Insects Producing Them. 123 opened the egg can still be seen lying within the cavity. The embryonic development is as yet unfinished and three weeks elapse before the larva emerges from the egg to find around it the material prepared for its nutriment. In this case the wound caused by the fl}- is the immediate exciting cause of cell activity, and leads to gall formation." M. W. Beyerinck, in a paper regarding the growth of the gall of Nematus caprea on Salix amygdalina holds a similar view. I have not seen this paper, but an abstract^i^ of it says: "The production of the gall is undoubtedly due to the matter secreted by the poison gland, which is, consequently, homologous with the poison of Hymenoptera aculeata ; when the insect does not deposit an egg in the wound which it makes, the quantity of albuminous matter poured into the vesicle is always less than when an egg is deposited ; by careful observation it is possible to assure oneself that the size of the gall is always proportional to the size of the wound and the quantit}^ of albuminoid matter introduced. By an experiment in which a deposited egg was punctured by a fine needle, it was shown that the gall is due to the parent and not to the egg ; but, of course, in such a case the gall remains small ; neither the egg nor the larva are necessary for its production, though their presence exercises a certain influ- ence on the regularity of their development." The ovipositors of the Cynipidae vary in length and in the amount of coiling within the abdomen. All present the same general characters. So far I have been unable to detect any relationship between the length and character of the ovipositors and the location and complexity of the galls (Figs. 94 to 98). Adler claims that the egg is always deposited in or near the Cambium layer of the plant. I am inclined to accept this state- ment, but have made no special effort to verify it. If Adler' s observations are correct the length of the ovipositor would be associated not with the depth of the Cambium from the surface of that part of the mature plant affected, but with the location of the Cambium at the time of oviposition and with the difficul- ties which the insect would experience in forcing the ovipositor to the desired point. Oviposition usually occurs before the buds are open, and the eggs may be placed in three positions ( i ) in the stem, as in the case of Rhodites radicum O. S., R. globulus Beut., Andricus cornigerous O. S. ; (2) in the apex of the incipient stem as in Andricus clavula Bassett, and Holcaspis globulus F'itch ; or (3) in the leaves of the bud as in Rhodites bicolor Harris, Amphi- bolips confluentus Harris, A. inanis O. S., A. ilicifoliae Bassett, Neuroterus irregularis O. S., A. seminator, Callirhytis tumifica ••■Jour. Roy. Micr. Soc, 1SS7, p. 746. 124 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 6, O. S., Holcaspis centricola O. S., Dryophanta palustris O. S., and Callirhj'tis papillatus O. S. In these cases it is evident that the force necessary to penetrate the bud may be as great or even greater than the force uecessar}' to penetrate a stem. Adler's observations demonstrate that great force is used to penetrate the buds and reach the desired point for depositing the eggs. Beyerinck has demonstrated that the fluid ejected by the ovi- positor of the Cynipidae is very different from the fluid ejected from other Hymenopterous insects ; that it is without taste or smell and does not irritate when injected under the skin. Adler has demonstrated that this fluid cannot be considered as the stim- ulus to gall production. It is probable that it may serve to attach the eggs, or as an antiseptic, or as a seal for the wound. Since the gall does not form until after the hatching of the larva it is evident that oviposition does not furnish the stimulus unless it maj^ be that there is cell division but no swelling of the plant tissues previous to the hatching of the larva. The author has made no observations upon this point. Adler, in discussing this question, says, in regard to Trigonaspis : " This fly pricks the leaf in May, but months pass before au}^ trace of gall forma- tion can be seen. It has tolerably strong ovipositor with which it cuts into the veins of the leaf, and in this way a distinct mark is left wherever an egg has been inserted. Guided by these marks it is easy to find the egg, but it is not until September that the larva leaves the egg, and then gall formation begins." MOUTHPARTS. Since oviposition does not give an explanation of the stimulus causing the formation of the gall it is necessar}' for us to turn our attention to the mouthparts. For convenience the insects may now be divided into two groups, those with mouthparts for sucking, which make their attacks upon the outside, and those with mouthparts for biting, which make their attacks from the inside. Under the former are included the Acarina, the Hemiptera and the Diptera ; under the latter are included the Lepidoptera and the Hymenoptera. I. HEMIPTERA. The Hemipterous insects which produce galls ma^- be placed in the following order, with reference to the complexity of their galls, beginning with the lowest : Schizoneura, Colopha, Horma- ])his, Phylloxera, Pemphigus and Pachypsylla. Mouthparts of the following were carefully examined : Schizoneura americana Riley, Colopha ulmicola Fitch (Fig. 99), Hormaphis hamamelis Fitch, Phylloxera carya-fallax Riley, P. c.-globuli WaLsli, P. c.-spinosa Shinier, P. vastatrix Planchon, Pemphigus populi- transversus Riley, P. p.-caulis Fitch, P. vagabundus Walsh, April, 1904.] Galls and Insects Producing Them. 125 Pachypsylla celtidis mamma Riley (Figs. looa, b), and P. c. -gemma Riley. The stud}^ of these mouthparts gave no new anatomical facts. The different genera showed considerable variation as to length of beak and setae. In general it may be said that the setae tend to increase in the distance the}' may be protruded beyond the tip of the beak as the galls approach complexity. This, however, cannot be considered an exact rule, since the S. americana, C. ulmicola and H. hamamelis have setae of practically the same length, although the gall produced by S. americana is much simpler than the galls produced by either C. ulmicola and H. hamamelis (Part I, Figs. 12, 13 and 15). It was impossible to make exact measurements of the distance the setae protruded beyond the tip of the beak, since it was impossible to tell whether the setae were fully extended or partially retracted. The above conclusions were reached after the examination of a large number of specimens. So far as I have been able to determine the insects do not remain attached to any one point for a great length of time. The P. c. -mamma (Figs. looa, b) has a gall of the greatest complex- ity, and the insect has setae which protrude farther beyond the point of the beak than any other examined ; a large number of these galls were opened and the position of the insect noted. The insect was never found attached and apparently had no definite point of attack. The preceding observations emphasize Conclusions 6 and 8 of Part I and a statement in the first of Part V. That is, the modi- fication of the plant tissue to form the gall is purely mechanical, being a continuous effort on the part of the plant to heal the wound produced by the repeated puncturing of the cells by the insect. When a branch is cut from a tree a growth is produced which tends to cover the wound. In this case a single wound and a single stimulus which is purely mechanical but which pro- duces rapid growth for the purpose of covering the wound. In the case of Aphididae and the Psyllidae galls the wounds are more slight but repeated rapidly, the stimulus is mechanical and the growth rapid, tending to cover the injury. It is possible that the setae of the various genera may stimulate different tissues and thus cause galls of varying complexity, but upon this question I am not ready to give a definite statement. 2. DIPTERA. The Cecidomyid galls occur upon a greater variety of hosts than any other group of galls, and as previously stated in Part V, show by far the greatest variation in structural characters and the smallest number of typical characters. 126 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 6, The mouthparts of a number of larvae were examined (Figs. loi, 102), and all were practically the same; salivary or other gland structures could not be demonstrated. I am inclined to believe that the Cecidomjnd galls are due to purely mechanical stimuli and that the great variations are due to the different tissues upon which the larvae feed. Mr. W. A. Cannon,-'^ in discussing a Cecidomyid gall on the Monterey pine, says that the "larvae take their food only by absorption through the surface of the body," also that " there is no indication that the hypertrophy is either caused or affected by any substance deposited with the eggs." 3. HYMENOPTERA. We now come to the galls of greatest complexity and also to those with which we have the greatest difficulty. These galls are so very generally infested with parasites and inquilines that it is difficult to decide which larva is the true gall producer. A careful study of these shows that the insects have a very strong pair of mandibles (Figs. 103 to 108), each working upon two pivotal points. Some of these mandibles appear to have an opening at the tip (Figs. 104, 105), and some showed what appeared to be sacs or glands at the base (Figs. 104, io6b). In one case at least (Fig. 104) these glandular sacs appeared to be connected with the opening. The question that naturally pre- sents itself is, are these openings for the purpose of pouring out a fluid or are they suctorial as in the case of Chr3'Sopa and other families ? In only two species was it possible to demonstrate these structures. Some light is thrown upon this b^- Part VIII, in which it was shown that the cell walls of the inner or nutritive zones were not destroyed, but that the contents of the cells were removed, causing them to shrivel. The teeth of the mandibles are never on the same plane and the mandibles become more and more chitinous as the larvae approach maturity. The strength of the mandibles appears to depend upon the density of the tissue through which the insect works its way to the outside In A. inanis (104) and A. con- fluentus (Fig. 105) the strength of the mandibles is practically the same and the character of the galls very similar. In D. sim- inis (Figs. io6a, b) the mandibles are stronger and the tissues of the gall correspondingly denser. C. petiolicola (Fig. 103) is by far the strongest of thOvSe studied, and the tissues through which the insect must work its way the densest of the leaf galls (Fig. 124). A sttidy was made of the larvae from galls of C. papillatus. This is a small, rather dense leaf gall. Larvae of two species '"Cannon, W. A. "The Gall of the Monterey Pine." The American Naturalist, Vol. XXXIV, No. 406 (Oct., 1900), p. Soi. April, 1904.] Galls and Insects Producing Them. 127 were found (Figs. 107, 108). A careful study of the mouth- parts lead me to consider No. 107 as a true gallmaker and No. 108 as a j)arasite. The mouthparts of the one which I consider a true gallmaker were as strong as those of C. petiolicola (Fig. 103). The mandibles of the parasite (108) were equally strong and showed what appeared to be rudimentar}^ gland structures. Holcaspis globulus Fitch was the only bud (i. e., incipient stem gall, Part III, Fig. 34) gall examined. In the young larvae the mouthparts are weak, but as the larvae approach maturity the mandibles become very strong (Fig. 109) and well fitted to cut the opening for the escape of the insect. However, the mouthparts were not so strong as in the case of C. petiolicola, but the gall of H. globulus is not so dense as the gall of C. petiolicola. The mouthparts of Nematus pomum Walsh (Fig. no) were ver}' similar to those of the Cynipidae. I am not inclined to con- sider the apparently glandular-like structure observed in a few species of any great importance. They may be suctorial or they may be degenerate organs. I consider the stimulus as purely mechanical. The character of the gall may depend iipon the location, which would result in difference in tension in different parts of the plant on which the gall may be located and also upon the laws of natural selection, which will be considered in the latter part of this paper. It would be interesting to know the exact time that cell divi- sion begins in the formation of a gall, but it is very difficult to make satisfactor}^ observations upon this point. Adler has made successful observations upon this stage in Neuroterus laviuscultis and Biorhiza aptera. He says: "The moment the larva has broken through the egg covering and has for the first time wounded the surrounding cells with its delicate mandibles, a rapid growth begins. This goes on so quickly that while the posterior part of the larva is still within the covering a wall of like growth of cells has already arisen in front. This rapid cell increase can be easily explained because the irritation set up by the emerging larva is exerted upon highlj- formative cells which collectivel}- possess ever)?- condition of growth. The cells which are primarily around the larva cannot be distinguished from the parenchymatous cells from which the)' proceed." 4. LEPIDOPTKRA. A careful study was made of the mouthparts of the Gelechia solidaginis Fitch (Fig. in) and upon an undetermined species found upon Rudbeckia laciniata (Part VI). The mandibles are larger and much stronger than in an}' of the Hymenopterous gallmakers which I examined. The gall is also much stronger than any of the Hymenopterous galls whose larvae were studied. No glandular structures were observed. 128 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 6, CONCLUSION. 1. The fluid secreted by the ovipositor is not an irritant, and therefore cannot be the stimulus for gall production. 2. Since the gall does not form, excepting the Nematus galls, until the appearance of the larvae, it is improbable if oviposition is a stimulus for gall production ; and in those insects in which the egg is not deposited within the tissues of the plant it is impossible. 3. Glandular structures were observed in only a few of the Hymenopterous larvae and these were of doubtful character, 4. Since it has so far been impossible to demonstrate the presence of a chemical stimulus except in Nematus, we must consider that the stimulus is usually mechanical. As previously stated (Part I, Conclusion 3) the morphological characters of the gall depend upon the genus of the insect producing it rather than upon the plant upon which it is produced. The earl}- history of all galls except the Cecidom3'id is practicalh^ the same (Part V, Con. 2). The shape and external character of the gall probably depends upon the following : ( i ) The plant upon which the attack is made; (2) Upon the part upon which the attack is made ; (3) Upon the tissues affected ; (4) Upon possible results of natural selection. SUMMARY OF PARTS. Next in importance to the problem of a stimulus giving rise to a gall is the explanation of specific external characters. This question is not easil}' answered and at the present time any explanation must be largel}^ theoretical. The gall-producing insects are found in six orders, as follows : I. Arachnida (mites); 2. Hemiptera (Aphidae and Psyllidae); 3. Diptera (Cecidomj-idae and Trypetidae); 4. Hymenoptera (Cynipidae and Tenthrenidae); 5. I^epidoptera, and 6, Coleop- tera. The gall-producing habit must have originated independ- ently in each of these orders and in some orders (Diptera and Hymenoptera) it must have originated independenth- in each of the two families represented. The formation of the gall is due to two primary factors ; a stimulus, usually mechanical, given b>- the insect, and nourish- ment furnished by the plant. Conclusions reached as results of previous studies and bearing on this subject are as follows : I. "Galls maybe classified into two general groups, viz.; those produced by mouthparts and tho.se produced by oviposition. Those produced by oviposition may be considered the more highly developed." (Part I, Con. i.) April, 1904.] Galls and Insects Producing Them. 129 2. " The gall does not form until the appearance of the larvae. Therefore all galls are produced by mouthparts." (Part VIII, Con. I.) The Nematus galls are an exception. 3. "The morphological character of the gall depends upon the genus of the insect producing it rather than upon the plant on which it is produced." (Part I, Con. 3.) 4. ' ' Within each f amil}' we find certain morphological resem- blances." (Part I, Con. 4.) 5. " The families show parallel lines of development from a low form of gall structure up to a high form." (Part I, Con. 5.) 6. " The presence of at least two zones, of which the inner may be considered nutritive." (Part I, Con. 7. ) 7. "The formation of the gall is probably an effort on the part of the plant to protect itself from an injur}^ which is not sufficient to cause death. Both Adler and Fockeu consider that after the first stages of formation the gall becomes an independ- ent organism growing upon the host plant. This is probabl}' true in the highly developed galls of Aphididae, Cecidomyia, and Cj-nipidae, but the writer is doubtful if this is true in the less complex galls of Acarina, Aphididae and Cecidomyia." (Part I, Con. 8 and Part V, Con. 6.) 8. "In the formation of all leaf galls except the Cecidomyia galls the normal cell structure of the leaf is first modified by the formation of a large number of small, compact, irregularly shaped cells. In the galls of Acarina and Aphididae this is followed by a development of trichomes, especially in the former. In all galls the mesophyll is subject to the greatest modification. Man}' small fibro-vascular bundles are formed in this modified meso- phyll." (Part V, Con. 2.) 9 . " Trichomes are far more common in galls produced by mouthparts than in those produced by oviposition." (Part V, Con. 9, and see Summary 2.) 10. " \"ariatiou in galls is due to their being produced by insects of different orders, to their working upon different parts of the plant and upon different tissues of these parts." (Part III, Con., and Part IV, Con. i.) I. ARACHNIDA. The Arachnida galls are of four types : ( i ) A modification in the epidermis of the leaf as in the Phytoptus galls on maple and elm ; (2) A fold in the plant tissue cau.sing a cavity filled with trichomes, among which the parasites live, as in the case of many Phytoptidi (Figs. 8, 9, 10, 11, 43, 44, 45, Parts I and V) ; (3) A swelling with an exposed surface covered with trichomes, among which the parasites live, as in the case of Erineum 13° The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 6, anomalum (Part V, Figs. 47, 48); (4) The witchbroom forma- tion, as in the case of the Phytoptus sp , and Sphaerotheca phytoptophila Kell. and Sw. on Celtis occidentalis. The author has studied only the second and third types. The difference between these two may be accounted for by the fact that the Phytoptus attacks the blade while the Erineum attacks the petiole, mid-rib or larger vein. The part affected undergoes a curvature in each case in the direction of the least resistance. 2. HEMIPTERA. The method of attack by the Hemiptera is practically the same as in Arachnida, i. e., by sucking mouthparts. The galls present a complete serial line of development, the lowest form being a simple curling of the leaf as in the case of Schizoneura americana, the next higher, a simple folding of the leaf, as in the case of Colopha ulmicola, the next higher is a more complex structure, such as the Phylloxera galls and H. hamamelis, the next higher, the slightly more complex, as in the case of the Pemphigus galls (Figs. 12 to 21, and 49 to 58). The galls of the Pachypsylla (Figs. 59, 60) are the most highl}' developed of the entire series. Although in this case we have a complete series, it is difficult to understand how this development has been produced. It may be that the different forms are due to the attack being made upon different tissues in each case, or to the degree in which the tissues are injured. Upon this point we have no direct proof. However, there is ver}' little doubt that the stimulus is entirely mechanical. 3. DIPTERA. As previously stated, the Cecidomyid galls are far more varied in location and in morphological structure than any other group of galls and show less number of characters peculiar to them- selves alone. There is not sufficient data to draw even theoretical conclusions concerning the influencing causes in their devel- opment. 4. HYMENOPTERA. As previously stated, the Cynipidous galls are the most highly developed and show a greater number of morphological structures peculiar to themselves than any other group (Part I, Con. 2 ; Party, Con 3). vSince the gall does not begin to develop until after the hatching of the larvae, oviposition cannot be an important factor excei)t in so far as it is necessary to have the i^i:^^ j^laced in certain tissues. Examination of the mouthparts show few, small and insignifi- cant gland-like structures the character of which is doubtful. It is therefore probable tliat the stinudus is purely mechanical except in the Nematus. But how are we to account for the great num- April, 1904.] Galls and Insects Producing Them. 1 3 1 ber of specific external characters ? Let us first review the struc- tural characters of the leaf galls, since these galls show the most uniform line of development. Considering Neuroterous irregu- laris the gall of greatest simplicity, we can formulate the following diagram : C. papillatus. A. confluentus. N. irregularis — C. tumifica. -H. centricola. -A. inanis. -D. palustris. -A. petiolicola. In N. irregularis the zones are not so well developed as in C. tumifica. In C. tumifica the zones are perfect, but in contact. In C. papillatus the protective and parenchyma zones are sepa- rated, but connected by long parenchyma cells. In H. centricola and A. inanis the protective and parench3mia zones are connected by fibro-vascular bundles. In A. confluentus the}^ are connected both by fibro-vascular bundles and b}- parenchyma cells (Fig. 121). In D. palustris the parenchyma and protective zones are not connected. In A. petiolicola the zones are in contact, but the tissues are yevy dense, due to location in the petiole of mid- rib of the leaf. If galls become independent structures they are undoubtedly subject to the same laws of natural selection as any other group of organisms, or if they be considered as parts of the plant they must also be subject to the same laws of natural selection as any other part of the plant on which they live. How, then, have these laws affected the gall ? It may be a protective coloration against birds and rodents, and other insects, but this cannot be very important since mau)^ species of galls are verj^ con.spicuous. Furthermore, animals make but very little use of galls for food. So far I have observed other animals using galls for food but once and then birds were tearing open the large galls of Pemphi- gus vagabundus and eating the insects. The tannin which devel- ops in such abundance in all galls as the}" approach maturity is probably a great protection against insectivorous animals. The greatest insect enemy with which the gall insect has to contend is the great number of parasites. The size, shape and character of the epidermal covering of the gall may be a protec- tion against this numerous eneni}-. The thickness of the gall and the density of the ti.ssues, especially the protective zone, is an 132 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 6, important protective device. The large intercellular chambers in the parenchyma zone place the larvae at a great distance from the surface of the gall without increasing the amount of work neces- sary for the mature insects to accomplish before reaching the outside ; this is undoubtedly a great protection against parasites, since it increases the difficulties for the parasite in reaching the larvae with the ovipositor, The development of these protective devices is probably the result of natural selection. Since the character of the gall depends upon the insect, many variations in the gall may also depend on variations in the stimuli given by the insect. If these variations in character of epidermis, in thickness of parenchyma zone, in the formation of large intercellular spaces, in thickness and density of protective zone, are advantageous to the insect in protecting it from the numerous parasites, these characters ma}^ be perpetuated in succeeding generations and the gall may increase in complexity. Natural selection is a reasona- ble explanation. It should be remembered that the plant is making an effort to resist a parasite from which it cannot escape. The gall-maker derives its nourishment without destroying its host and at the same time strives to protect itself as far as possible from the great number of parasitic enemies. The food supply first becomes a part of the gall and upon this supply which, in the case of the Cynipidae, is stored in the nutritive zone, it feeds. Any irritation, such as the cutting or puncturing of plant tis- sues, may and usually does cause excessive growth. It is proba- ble that the primitive galls were of a type similar to the simplest of the Phytoptus galls, i. e., a peculiar growth of the epidermal cells. The next step in the evolution of the gall maj^ be repre- sented by a type similar to Schizoneura americana, in which case the stimulus is greater, resulting in a curling of the leaf. The next step may be represented by a type similar to the more com- plex Phytoptus galls, H. hamamelis, C, ulmicola, the Phylloxera, the Pemphigus and the most complex of the Pachypsylla galls in which we find a series of more or less complex folds in the leaf up to the increase in amount and differentiation of the tissue as in the case of P. p. -mamma. In the Cynipidous galls we have the greatest complexity, but also a factor somewhat different from that in the forms to which we have referred, i. e., the placing of the egg below the surface and in those tissues upon which the larva is expected to feed. It is impossible to sa}- whether this habit of placing the egg below the surface was acquired before or after the gall-making habit, but it must be a great advantage to the insect. These galls, as previousl}' demonstrated, show the more comjilex serial line of development of any of the galls, but even the simplest of these is more complex than the most complex gall produced by any other April, 1904.] Galls and Insects Producing Them. 133 order of insect. This verj' complex development is due to an earl}- acquirement of the gall-making habit or to more rapid evo- lutionary development as a result of the deposition of the egg below the surface. The greater part of the work connected with Part IX of this series was conducted at the lyake lyaboratory of the Ohio State University at Sandusky, Ohio, and I am very much indebted to the Director, Professor Herbert Osborn, for valuable assistance. I also wish to express ni}' thanks to the many friends who have collected material and otherwise aided in these studies. This series of papers will be presented to the Faculty of the College of Arts, Philosophy and Science, of the Ohio State University, as the thesis requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, June, 1904. IvITERATURE. Continuous with the bibliography published with Parts I and II. 24. Adler, Dr. H. " Lege-Apparat und Eierlegen der Gall- wespen." Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift XXI. 1877, Heft II. 25. Beyerinck, Dr. M. W. " Beobachtungen uber die ersten entwicklungsphasen einiger Cynipidengallen." Veroffentlicht durch die Konigliche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Amster- dam, 1882. 26. Beijerinck, M. W. " Bydrage tot de Morphologic der Plantegallen," 1877. 27. Beijerinck, M. W. " De Gal van Cecidomyia aan Poa nemoralis," Overgedrukt uit het Maandblad voor Natuurwet- enschatten, 1884, No. 5. 28. Beijerinck, M. W. " Ueber Gallbildung und Genera- tionswechsel bei Cynips calicis und uber die Circulansgalle," Verhandelingen der Koninklijke Akademie van Wetenschappen te Amsterdam, 1894. 29. Beijerinck, M. W. " Sur la Cecidiogenese et la Genera- tion Alternante chez le Cynips calicis. Observations sur la galle de L'Andricus circulans," Extrait des Archives Neerlandaises, T. XXX, p. 387-444- 30. Busgen, M. "Der Honigtau Biologische Studien an Pflanzen und Pflanzenlausen . ' ' Zeitschrift fur Naturwissenschaf t . Bd. XXV. 31. Busgen, M. " Zur Biologic der Galle von Hormomyia Fagi Htg. " Forstlich-naturwissenschaftliche Zeitschrift, Jan- uar, 1895. 32. Courchet, M. L. " Etude sur less Galles Causees par des Aphidiens." Akademie des Sciences et Eettres de Montpellier. Memoires de la section des sciences. 33. Derbes, M. " Observations sur les Aphidiens qui fontles Galles des Pistachiers." 134 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 6, 34. Eckstein, Dr. Karl. " Pflanzengallen und Gallenthiere." 35. Fockeu, H. " Etude sur Ouelques Galles." Paris, 1897. 36. Heim, Dr. F. " Observations sur les Galles produites sur Salix babylonica par Nematus salicis." 1893. 37. Kessler, Dr. H. F. " Die Entwicklungs und Lebens- geschichte der Gallwespe Cynips calicis Brgst. und der von derselben an den weibliclien Bluthen von Quercus pedunculata Ehrh. horvorgerufenen Gallen, Knoppern genannt." Cassel, 1897. 38. Eacaze-Duthiers, M. Recherches pour servir a E'His- toire des Galles." Extrait des Annals des Sciences Naturelles, Tome XXIX. 39. Molliard, Marin. ' ' Recherches sur les Cecidies Florales. ' ' 1895- 40. Nabias, Dr. B. " Ees Galles et leurs Habitants." Paris, 1886. 41. Tschirch, A. " Ueber durch Astegopteryx, eine neue Aphidengattung, erzeugte Zoo-cecidien auf Styrax Benzoin Dryan." Deutschen Botanischen Gesell-schaft. 1890, Band VIII, Heft 2. 42. Rubsaamen, Ew. H. " Uber Zoocecidien von der Balkan- Halbinsel." 43. Paszlavszky, Jozsef. "A Rozagubacks Fejlodeserol." Ternieszetrajzi Fuzetek, Vol. V, Parte II-IV. Budapest, 1882. 44. Paszlavszk}^ Jozsef. " Beitrage zur Biologic der Cynipi- den." Wiener Entomologische Zeitung II. 1883, Heft 6. 45. Prilleieux, M. Ed. " Etude sur la Formation et le Devel- opment de Quelques Galles." 46. PierTe, M. I'abbe. " Ea Mercuriale et ses Galles." Extrait de la Revue scientifique du Bourbonnais et du Centre de la France, Juin, 1897. EXPLANATION OF PLATES IX-XII. The drawings were made with a Bausch & Lomb microscope. For Figs. 70-76 and Figs. 84-91 and Fig. 93b, a Number 2 ocular and J4 objective. For Figs. 77-83, a Number 2 ocular and /.^ immersion objective. With Figs. 92-9S and Figs. io6a, no and in, a i{ ocular and 2, objective. For Fig. 93 a Number 2 ocular and % objective. The reduction is not .so great as in the preceding parts and therefore the figures are proportionately slightly larger. The diagrams were not made upon a definite scale. The numbering of the drawings is continuous with the preceding parts. At)bieviatioiis : e. epidermis. mi.— nutritive zone. ep. — epidermal zone. f. v. b.— fibro-vascular bundles, pa. — parenchyma zone. 1. c. — larval chambers, p. — protective zone. sc. — sclerenchyma. FtOWER AND FRUIT GAI.I.S. 70. Section of leaf of Euphorbia corollata. 71a. Diagram of .section of Phytoptus sp gall on leaf of Iv corollata. 71b. Section of 71a. 72a. Section of lower part of ovary of H. corollata affected by I'hytoptus sp . April, 1904] Galls and Insects Producing Tkem. 135 72b. Section of upper part of flower of E. corollata affected by Phytoptus sp . 73a. Diagram of cross section of Cecidomyid bud gall on Solidago canadense. 73b. Section of same. 74a. Diagram of longitudinal section of Cecidomyid gall on Ratibida pinnata. 74b. Diagram of longitudinal section of Cecidomyid gall on Ratibida pinnata. 74c. Section of 74b. 75a. Section of unaffected fruit of Prunus virginiana. 75b. Section of Cecidomyid gall develop; d in fruit of P. virginiana. ROOT GALL. 76a. Section of young gall of Amphibolips radicola. 76b. Section of mature gall of A. radicola. HISTOLOGY. 77. Section of young gall of Phytoptus quadripes. 78. Section of young gall of Phj-toptus abnormis. 79. Section of nutritive zone of young gall of Amphibolips inanis. 80. Section of mature gall of A. inanis. 81. Section of mature gall of Callirhytis papillatus. (Nutritive, protective and part of parenchyma zones.) S2. Section of mature gall of Dryophanta palustris. (Nutritive, protective and part of parenchyma zones.) 83. Section of mature gall of Andricus petiolicola. SURFACE SECTIONS OF 84. Dryophanta palustris. (Very young gall. ) 84b. Dryophanta palustris. (Mature gall. 1 Amphibolips inanis. 85 86, 87 88 89 90, 91 Diastrophus siminis. Diastrophus potentilla. Pachyp.sylla c. -mamma Colopha ulmicola. Phylloxera c.-globuli. Pemphigus p.-transversus. 92. Cecidomyia gleditsiae. 93a. Nematus salicis-ovum. 93b. Nematus salicis-ovum. 94. Dryophanta palustris. 95. Amphibolips radicola. 96. Andricus cornigerus. 97. Andricus seminal or. 98a. Rhodites radicum, 9Sb. Rhodites radicum. OVIPOSITORS OF MOUTHPARTS OF 99. Colopha ulmicola. looa. Pachypsylla c. -mamma, with setae extended, loob. Pachyp.sylla c -:namma, with setae retracted, loi. Cecidomyia gleditsiae. 102. Cecidomyia pellex. 103. Andricvis petiolicola. 104. Amphibolips inanis. 105. Amphibolips confluentus. io6a. Diastrophus siminis. io6b. Diastrophus siminis. 107. Callirhytis papillatus. 108. Parasite from gall of C. papillatus. 109. Holcaspis globulus, no. Nematus pomum. III. Gelechia gallae-solidaginis. 136 Ohio Naturalist. The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 6, P/afe IX . Cook on "Galls and Insects Producing Them." April, 1904.] Galls and Insects Producing Them. 137 Ohio Naturalist. Plafe X. Cook on "Galls and Insects Producing Them." 138 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 6, Ohio Naturalist. Plate XI. Cook on " Galls and Insects Producing Them." April, 1904.] Galls and Insects Producing Them. ^39 Ohio Naturalist. P/ate XII. Cook on "Galls and Insects Producing Them." I40 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 6, appendi:k I. GALLS AND INSECTS PRODUCING THEM. Melville Thurston Cook. Part I. Morphology of Leaf Galls. I. GALLS OF THE APHIDIDAE. The gall of Pemphigus vagabundus Walsh (Fig. 112) is evi- dently formed as a result of the distortiou of a large number of bud leaves. My specimens of these galls were mature, so I was unable to follow its development. Small fibro- vascular bundles were numerous and tannin was formed in great abundance. The structure was so modified that the leaf characters were lost ; the cells were uniform in character, but were slightly smaller near both the exterior and interior surfaces. The galls of Pemphigus rhois Fitch (Fig. 113) are large, blad- dery and evidently the pocketing of a single leaflet of the host plant, Rhus glabra or R. typhina. My specimens of these galls were fully mature, and I was therefore unable to follow the line of development. The leaf structure was modified into the char- acteristic Aphididae gall structure. Fibro-vascular bundles were numerous and near the inner surface of the gall. Opposite each bundle was a large cavity filled with some substance which I was unable to determine. 2. GALLS OF CECIDOMYIDAE. The galls of Cecidomyia pellex O. S. (Figs. 1 14a, b) are formed by a thickening of the petiole, giving it the appearance of a long fleshy bean pod with a slit along the upper side. This gall shows three well defined zones ; an inner nutritive zone of small cells, a parenchyma zone of larger cells and the epidermal zone. The fibro-vascular bundles are numerous and are located between the nutritive and protective zones and arranged around the larval cavity and opening, the largest one just below the larval chamber and corresponding to the mid-rib of the leaflet. Cecidomyia impatientis O. S. (Fig, 115) is a fleshy gall occur- ring on the leaves of Impatiens fulva. Some of my specimens had the appearance of deformed flower buds, but upon this point I was unable to decide. This gall .showed two well defined zones ; a zone of small cells lining the larval chamber and making up about one half the thickness of the gall, and an outer zone of large cells. Small fibro-vascular bundles were formed between the zones. The galls of Cecidomyia liolotricha O. S. on Hicoria ovata (Figs. ii6a, b, c) are small and very firm. My specimens were April, 1904.] Galls and Insects Producing Them. 141 mature, but the cells lining the larval chamber were well supplied with protoplasm, and numerous short trichomes were developed from the dorsal surface and extended into the chamber. Tannin was very abundant. The gall of Cecidomyia tubicola O. S. on Hicoria ovata (Figs. 1 17a, b, c) is very similar to C. holotricha, except that the amount of tannin is not so great. The upper wall of the gall is much thicker than either the side or lower wall. The point of attach- ment is not so large, but the gall is protected by a growth pro- ducing a cup-shaped cavity in which the gall is developed (Fig. 117a). The inner layers of cells are very rich in protoplasn). The cells are elongated in the long axis of the gall and fibro- vascular bundles are more numerous than in C. holotricha, but are very small. The cup- shaped structure (117c) in which the gall is formed is composed of elongated cells. The palisade cells in that part of the leaf opposite the gall are unaffected. Cecidomyia viticola O. S. (Fig. 118) has the same general character as C, tubicola, but is much longer. Sciara ocellaris O. S. is one of the simplest of the Cecidomyidae galls. The larva does not penetrate the tissues of the leaf, but confines its attack to the outside, causing an indentation on one surface of the leaf and a corresponding elevation on the opposite surface (Fig. 119a) and also causing a very slight thickening. The structure (Fig, 1 19c) when compared with that of the normal leaf (Fig. 119b) shows the palisade transformed into ordinary mesophyll and the intercellular spaces entirely obliterated. It therefore corresponds in structure to the simple leaf-curl galls produced by some of the Aphididae (e. g., Schizoneura Ameri- cana Riley, Part i, Fig. 12). 3. GALLS OF THE CYNIPIDAE. My specimens of Rhodites bicolor Harris (Fig. 120) were well developed when collected. I was therefore unable to determine the early structural characters. The structure in these galls evi- dently does not show the four well defined zones so characteristic of this family. The inner cells are well supplied with nourish- ment for the large number of larvae. The galls of Amphibolips confluentus Harris are very large and have a single larval chamber in th'/ center. The nutritive and protective zones (Fig. 12 ta) can be distinguished, but are not so well defined as in the closely related species, A, inanis (Part I, Figs. 28a, b). The parenchyma and epidermal zones (Fig, 121b) are well defined and the space in the parenchyma is filled with a cottony-like substance which upon close examination is composed of fibro- vascular bundles (as in A. inanis, Figs. 28a, b, and H. centricola. Figs. 27a, b, c) and of long, unicellular threads (Fig. i2ic), as in C. papillatus (Figs. 30a, b, c and 81). fe 142 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 6, My specimens of Amphibolips illicifoliae Bassett were too far advanced to admit of sectioning, but a careful examination indi- cated that the zones were well defined and that the space in the pareuchj'ma zone is bridged b}' means of fibro-vascular bundles as in A. inanis and H. centricola. The galls of Amphibolips prunus Walsh (Fig. 122) are very- firm and all the zones are well defined excej^t the protective zone, which is entirely absent. The parenchyma zone is very thick and probably compensates for the lack of a protective zone. There are very few small fibro-vascular bundles. Galls of Amphibolips sculpta Bassett (Fig. 123) were more succulent than other specimens which I have examined. My specimens were mature, but the four zones were well defined. The nutritive zone was almost obliterated, due to the age of the gall. The protective zone was thin and the cell walls not very thick. The parenchyma zone was very thick and composed of large, succulent cells and was probably very important in furnish- ing nutriment to the larva. Near the outer surface were numer- ous small fibro vascu'ar bundles. The epidermal zone was very prominent and composed of small cells. Andricus petiolicola Bassett is one of the firmest of the leaf galls. It is formed either on the petiole or mid-rib and is com- po.sed of very small, firm cells (Fig. 124). The four zones are well defined, but the protective zone is very thin and the cell walls but very little thicker than in the neighboring cells The parenchyma zone is very thick, composed of very small cells with no intercellular spaces, but with many la3'ers of long fibrous cells. The galls of Acraspis erinacei Walsh (Fig. 125) are very con- spicuous. The galls are always developed on the mid-rib of the leaf, but contain no fibro-vascular bundles. The nutritive zone is thick and very rich in protoplasm. The protective zone is also thick and graduall}- merges into the parenchyma zone, which is also thick. The epidermal zone is ver)' irregular and is covered with numerous unicellular trichomes. The galls of Biorhiza forticornis Walsh are fig-shaped and the larval chamber instead of being suspended in the center of the gall, as is many others, is placed at the apex (Fig. 126a) and the space between the protective and parenchyma zones, or rather in tlie parcnchynia zone, extends Jess than half way round the larval chamber. My specimens were mature and I was unable to make a careful study of the nutritive and protective zones. However, the nutritive zone appeared to be relatively thicker, while the protective zone was thin and merged gradually into the paren- chyma zone (Fig. 126b). The parenchyma zone was thick and composed of large c^lls (Fig. 126c). Considerably more of this zone remained attached to the ])rotective zone than is the case with most galls where this .separation occurs. The cavity formed April, 1904.] Galls and Insects Producing Them. 143 by the separation of the cells in this zone is bridged bj^ numerous unicellular threads as in C, papillatus (Figs. 30a, b, c). In the outer part of the parenchyma zone, but near the cavity, are formed the fibro-vascular bundles. The epidermal zone is well defined and the trichomes on the surface are uni-cellular (Fig. 126CJ. 4. GALLS OF TENTHREDINIDAE. The galls of Nematus pomum Walsh were the only leaf galls of this family that I secured and they were mature. There was no indication of a zonal structure, but the cells were very uniform in size and structure throughout the entire gall (Fig. 127). Many of the cells contained tannin and intercellular spaces were large and evenly distributed. Part II. Lateral Bud Galls. Mature specimens of Holcaspis globulus Fitch show the four well defined zones (Fig. 128). The inner nutritive zone is thick, composed of small cells and well supplied with nutriment for the larva. The protective zone is thin and composed of very small cells with thin walls. It gradually merges into the nutritive zone on the one side and the parenchyma zone on the other side. The parenchyma zone is very thick, the cell walls medium in size and the fibro-vascular bundles small and numerous. Further obser- vations upon this gall emphasize the statement previously made that it is the enlargement of an incipient stem. Further observations upon the gall of Andricus seminator Harris confirm the statement previously made that it is a com- pound gall produced by the insect depositing an o^^g in each element of the bud. Part III. Stem Galls. The gall of Diastrophus nebulosus O. S. (Fig. i2ga, b) is a very large swelling on the canes of Rubus villosus and is about two or three inches in length. It contains a large number of larval chambers each containing a single larva (Fig. 129a). The four zones are especiallj^ well defined. The nutritive and protec- tive zones are composed of a few laj-ers of cells while the paren- chyma zone is very thick, composed of smaller cells and more dense than the corresponding zone in most galls of this family. Andricus cornigerus O. S. (Fig. 130) produces one of the hardest of the stem galls. My specimens of this were gathered in the winter and were fully mature. The horn-like protuber- ance is a closed tube extending to near the center of the gall. This tube is composed of sclerenchyma tissue and evidently cor- responds to the protective zone. Near the base of the tube is a thin partition forming the larval chamber. When mature the 144 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 6, insect destroys this partition, travels to the end of the tube which projects beyond the body of the gall, and there makes an opening through either the end or the side of the tube and thus makes its escape. Examination of j'oung specimens would probably show the four zones as well defined as in Diastrophus nebulosus. Part IV. Developmknt of Galls. Examination of very young specimens of Andricus seminator Harris shows three well defined zones (Figs. 131a, b), the pro- tective zone being undeveloped. The fibro- vascular bundles were ver}^ numerous and distributed just beneath the epidermal zone. I have examined a large number of these galls of various ages and have been unable to find any trace of a protective zone. Tannin develops in the outer cells very early and probably helps to form a protection for the larva. PLATES XIII-XV. 112. Section of gall of Pemphigus vagabundus. 113. Section of gall of Pemphigus rhois. 114a. Diagram of gall of Cecidomyia pellex. 114b. Section of gall of Cecidomyia pellex. 115. Section of gall of Cecidomyia impatientis. ii6a. Diagram of the gall of Cecidomyia holotricha. ii6b. Section of the gall of Cecidomyia holotricha. ii5c. Section of the gall of Cecidomyia holotricha. 117a. Diagram of the gall of Cecidomyia tubicola. 117b. Section of the gall of Cecidomyia tubicola. 117c. Section of the gall of Cecidomyia tubicola. 118. Diagram of the gall of Cecidomyia viticola. 119a. Diagram of the gall of Sciara ocellaris. 119b. Section of normal leaf of Maple 119c. Section of gall of Sciara ocellaris. 120. .Section of gall of Rhodites bicolor. I2ia. Section of gall of Amphibolips confluentus. (Epidermal and parenchyma zones.) i2ib. Section of the gall of Amphibolips confluentus. Nutritive and protective zones. ) 121c. Section of gall of Amphibolips confluentus. ( Elongated cells in the cavity of the parenchyma zone. ) 122. Section of gall of Amphibolips piunus. 123. Section of gall of Amphibolips sculpta. 124. Section of gall of Andricus petiolicola. 125. Section of gall of Acraspis erinacei. 126a. Diagram of gall of Biorhiza forticornis. 126b. Section of gall of Biorhiza forticornis. (Nutritive and protective zones.) 126c. Section of the gall of Biorhiza forticornis. (Section of protective and epidermal zones. ) 127. Section of the gall of Nematus pomum. 128. Section of the gall of Holcaspis globulus. 129a. Diagram of gall of Diastrophus nebulosus. 129b. Section of gall of Diastrophus nebulosus 130. Diagram of gall of Andricus cornigerus 131a. Diagram of cross section of t;all of Andricus seminator. 131b. Section of young gall of Andricus seminator. April, 1904.] Galls and Insects Producing Them. 145 Ohio Naturalist. Plale XIII. Cook on "Galls and Insects Producing Them." 146 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 6, Ohio Naturaijst, /"/a^e XIV. "lOT^P Cook on "Galls and Insects Producing Them." April, 1904.] Galls and Insects Producing Them. H7 Ohio Naturai^ist. F/ah' XV. 12SC Cook on " Galls and Insects Producing Them." 148 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 6, NEWS AND NOTES. Color Key to North American Birds. — This is a recent addition to the ornithological literature of North America from the pen of the well known author, Frank M. Chapman, of the American Museum of Natural History, with over 800 illustrations in color, by Chester A. Reed, whose drawings and photographs have added so much to the value and attractiveness of the " Bird Magazine." The work is wholly devoid of technicalities, !-o one that is not a specialist as well as one that is may use and enjoy it together. It comes nearer answering the question, " How can I learn to know the birds," to the satisfaction of all, than any other work published. The authorship is sufhcitnt proof of its accurate- ness which is much in its favor, especially at the present time when so many questionable books on natural history subjects are appearing. The author states in the introduction that an attempt has been made so to group, figure and describe our birds that any species may be named which has been definitely seen. The birds are kept in their systsmatic orders, a natural arrangement readily comprehended, but further than this, accept- ed classifications have been abandoned and the birds have been grouped according to color and markings. This in a word gives the plan of the book, and any one who desires to know the birds afield, will find it a most desirable aid. Doubleday, Page & Company of New York City are the publishers. — J. S. H. Errata — In February, '04, Naturalist, p. 98, line 27, read '■ formerly labled Asplenium " for " formerly called Asplenium." In Bulletin of the United States Fish Commission for 1902, pages 369-394, Miss Julia W. Snow of Smith College gives the results of her work on "The Plankton Algae of Lake Erie." This is an important contribution to the flora of the lake and represents an inviting field of study which seems to be much neglected by American botanists. Two hundred and ele\-en species with a considerable additional number of varieties are listed, thirteen of which are described as new. Four good plates are given to illustrate the new species. — J. H. S. Wytsman's Genera Insectorum in the Lloyd Library, Cincinnati, Ohio. — C. G. Lloyd is subscribing for this great illustrated work, and has already received a number of the parts, which have been placed in the great Lloyd Botanical Library in Cincinnati, O. This library is open free to students who wish to consult any of the books on Botany and Entomology. Through the courtesy of Mr. Holden, the librarian, I ha\-e examined this magnificent work. — Charles Durv, Avondale, Cincinnati, Ohio. Date of Publication of April Number, April 5, 1904. CedaP Point Liake Liabopator^y. Offers Exceptional Opportunities for Study or Investigation During the Summer Months. THE laboratory is located on a beautiful site on Cedar Point near Sandusky giving convenient access to Lake Erie, to the marshes of Sandusky Bay, the river, islands, beach, forest and prairies, affording great variety of plant and animal life. Students are granted free trans- portation on the steamers of The Cedar Point Company. INSTRUCTION is offered in General Zoology, Botany, Entomology, Embryology, Icthyology, Ornithology, Plant Ecology, Morphology and Advanced Laboratory or Research Courses. FEES for the season are twenty dollars. EQUIPMENT includes tables, aquaria, dark room, boats, dredges and collecting apparatus. Microscopes and other instruments are supplied from the university. INVESTIGATION. Properly qualified persons are given free opportunity for independent investigation. INSTRUCTORS. The staff includes regular members of the instruc- tion staff of the university. CREDITS given university students for courses completed. LECTURE AND LABORATORY COURSES BEGIN JUNE 27, 1904. For further information or special circular, address Pres. W. 0. Thompson, or Herbert Osborn, Director Lake Laporatory, Ohio State Lniversity, Columbus, Ohio. Ohio State Academy of Science Publications. First Report, and First and Second Annual Reports Price 25 cts. each Third and Fourth Annual Reports Price 20 cts. each Fifth to Eleventh Annual Reports Price 15 cts. each Special Papers — No. i. " Sandusky Flora." pp. 167. By E. L. MOSEL^EY Price 35 cts. Special Papers — No. 2. " The Odonata of Ohio." pp. 116. By David S. KeIvLICOTT Price 35 cts. Special Papers— No 3. "The Preglacial Drainage of Ohio." pp. 75. By W. G. Tight, J. A. Bownocker, J. H. Todd and Gerard Fowke Price 35 cts. Special Papers — No. 4. "The Fishes of Ohio." pp. 105. By Raymond C. Osburn Price 35 cts. Special Papers— No. 5. " Tabanidae of Ohio." pp. 63. By James S. Hine Price 35 cts. Special Papers — No. 6. "The Birds of Ohio." pp. 241.* By Lynds Jones Price 50 cts. Special Papers — No. 7. "Ecological Study of Big Spring Prairie." pp. 96. By Thomas A. Bonser Price 35 cts. Address: W. C. MILLS, Librarian, Ohio State Academy of Science, Page Hall, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. Your Laboratory s. •^ ^ K C^^ t>ift cr^ Is it supplied with the latest and most usable appar= atus, and are you drawing your supplies from the most available source? Send us a trial order and notice the difference. ^ Jk ^ ± ± ^ ^ 50 MICROSCOPES From the Simplest to the Most Complete. For Students, Physicians and Speciiilists. Fi'i.i GUARANTEK witli every Instrument. MAGNIFIERS No. 50. Folding Pocket Magnifier No. 51. " ■' " Tripod Magnifier, adjnstable Hand Magnifier, metal case... .$ 20 . .-JO .50 . 1 00 7. Folding Magnifier, metal case 1.25 No. 172. Hasting's Aplanatic Triplet 7.00 DISSECTING MICROSCOPES T 1 $2.5U \V 1 $ 9.75 6.75 Y 1 25.75 COMPOUND MICROSCOPES \ li 1 $26.00 BB 4 S 55 00 l; 1 . . 1! 2.. B.V 2.. 35.00 BB 8 100,00 40.00 CA S 127.00 45.00 DD8 207 00 WRITE FOR DISCOUNTS mm. CATALOGUE On Request Y Tl^^ w Scientific Materials Company MAKERS - = = IMPORTERS 71 1^: Penn Ave. Pittsburgh, Pa. The Ohio ^ACaturalist, PUBLISHED BY The Biological Club of the Ohio State University, Volume IV. MAY, 1904. No. 7. TABLE OF CONTENTS Hyde— Changes in the Dnii nagv Near Laucaster 149 Claassen— List of the Mosses of Cuyahoga aud Other Counties of Northern Ohio 157 Morse— The Breeding Habits of the Myriopod, Fontaria Indianae 161 SCHAFFNEK — Di^eiduous Leaves 163 CHANGES IN THE DRAINAGE NEAR LANCASTER. Jesse E. Hyde. The drainage changes in the headwaters of the Hocking River, caused by the ice of the Glacial epoch, have been partiall}- worked out by Prof. Tight' and Mr. L,everett.'^ Their investigations relate to the changes in the river itself, to those tributaries lying to the east and to Clear Creek on the west. To the writer's knowledge, those changes which occurred in the region just west of the Hocking and between it and Clear Creek have not, as yet, been worked out. However, a brief review of the entire region may not be lacking in interest nor out of place. The writer wishes here to express his indebtedness to Prof. J. A. Bownocker for suggestions and criticisms in the preparation of this paper. The Hocking River rises on the upland in the southeastern part of Bloom township, Fairfield county, flow^s eastward and enters its valley proper in the southern part of Greenfield town- ship near Hooker. At Hooker its valley has a breadth of about two miles, but it is not very deep or well defined. At Lancaster it is more than a mile wide, but the rock hills on either side rise more abruptly and to a greater height, making the valley more conspicuous. Continuing down the stream, it narrows until at Sugar Grove it is not more than one-half mile wide, and just above Logan it is onh' a few hundred yards in width and \-ery gorge-like in character. At Sugar Grove the drift in the valley, as shown bj^ gas borings, is about loo feet deep, at Lancaster 200 feet and at Carroll, eight miles above Lancaster, 260 feet. The elevation of Carroll above sea level is 835 feet, that of Lancaster 831 feet and Sugar Grove 769 feet.^ This makes the rock floor 1. Bull. Denison University, No. IX, p. 33. 2. Glacial Formations and Drainage Features of the Erie and Ohio Basins, pp. 169-172. 3. Geol. Sur. of Ohio, Vol. 6, p. 802. 15° The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 7, of the valle}^ about loo feet lower at Carroll than at Sugar Grove ; that is, the rock floor slopes to the north in a direction opposite to that in which the present stream flows. This fact coupled with the shape of the valley makes it certain that prior to the Glacial epoch an old divide was located somewhere south of Sugar Grove. The exact site of this col has been variously placed by different writers ; Prof. Tight has very recentl}- located it about half waj^ between Logan and Nelsonville/ Before the ice invasion a stream headed on the northern side of this divide, flowed northward through the valle}- now occupied by the Hock- ing, and northwest of Carroll connected with the preglacial outlet of the upper Muskingum which crossed the northern part of Fairfield county. After the ice blocked this outlet, the water forced over the old divide at the head of the stream and in time it was cut to the present level. BLOOI CLEAR CREEK MADISON /"i^. I. Map showing drainage changes in the headwaters of the Hocking River. Big Rush Creek is a large tributary entering the Hocking from the east at Sugar Grove. It rises near New Lexington, Perry county, flows westwardly into Fairfield count)-, the valley widen- ing graduall}' until at Bremen it is three-quarters of a mile wide. At Bremen it turns abruptly to the south and narrows until a point in Hocking county one mile below the county line is reached. Here it is narrowest, being only 200 yards in width between the rock walls on either side, and the drift is only 20 feet deep. It 4. Professional Paper. No. 13, U. S. Geol. Survey. Drainage Modifications in South- eastern Ohio. p. 35. May, 1904.] Changes in the Drainage Near Lancaster. 151 there turns to the west, the valley widening until above Sugar Grove it is about half a mile wide. From Bremen to Lancaster there extends an old valley in places one mile broad and filled wnth drift to a depth of over 200 feet. Before the ice epoch this abandoned valley was the outlet for the waters of Big Rush Creek, a small tributary heading at the narrow point just below — Present Draintige. — *^^^-PreglQcial Drainage. Vdl/ey Wall * 0 I mile Fig. 2. Map showing changes on Arney and Muddy Prairie Creeks, the Hocking county line where there was a low divide and flow- ing north to Big Rush Creek, while a second headed on the other side of the divide and flowed westward to the Hocking. The ice blocked up the old outlet at Lancaster, turning the water over this low col and cutting the present outlet. There is one point in connection with this abandoned valley that Prof. Tight merely notices but does not connect with the 152 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, Ko. 7, glacial history of the region. Near the western end, Pleasant Run enters the abandoned portion of the valley- from the north, flows diagonally across it toward the southwest and enters a nar- row valley about one mile long, the southern end of which opens into the Hocking valley. This narrow valley is about 300 yards wide at its narrowest point and is bordered by ver}^ steep rock walls 150 to 200 feet high. The floor is a level plain, in every way a continuation of the floor of the larger valley. There are no well borings which might show the depth of drift. It is not in a position for an oxbow of either the Hocking or the stream which formerly occupied the abandoned valle}'. It is possible that there may have been a low col in this narrow \-alley over which the waters from the east poured after their outlet at lyancasier had been blocked by ice but before the present outlet had been cut. Subsequent advance of ice might have blocked this outlet and the present drainage have been developed. Little Rush Creek rises in Perrj^ county near New Reading and flows westward into Fairfield county, entering Big Rush Creek at Bremen. In its upper course its valley is broad and two and one-half miles northeast of Rushville a depth of 160 feet was reached with no rock. A short distance above Rushville it begins to narrow. At the station a depth of 40 feet was penetrated with- out encountering rock, but a few hundred yards below, the valley becomes extremely gorge-like and the stream flows on rock, everything indicating the site of a col. This region was probably drained to the northwest into the preglacial outlet of the Mus- kingum, although the channel is now diftlcult to trace. A low, broad depression extends from a short distance above Rushville through to this old valley. Clear Creek enters Hocking from the west about three miles below Sugar Grove. Its headwaters are in a rolling, drift-covered region not far from the headwaters of the Hocking, but its valley first becomes well defined near Amanda, where it is more thnn a mile wide and is bordered by rock hills. It narrows graduall>-, how^ever, and near Revenge becomes very gorge-like although there is a flood-plain several hundred feet wide. About four miles above its juncture with Hocking, it narrows perceptibly until the flood-])lain is not more than 100 yards in width, the hills being very abru])t and about 200 feet or more in height. Below this point the valley widens somewhat but not much. This nar- row^ point is an old col. The preglacial outlet of Clear Creek is buried beneath drift deposits but was probably northwest from Amanda into the vScioto. A valley extends from Lancaster southwest to Amanda, con- necting the Clear Creek and Hocking valleys. At Lancaster it is about one mile wide but it narrows until, at Delmont five miles distant and 250 feet above Lancaster, it is about 300 yards in May, 1904.] Changes in the Drainage Near Lancaster. 153 width, the hills are 150 to 200 feet high and rise rather abrupth' on either side. It then widens until it enters Clear Creek where its width is again about one mile. From a short distance west of Delmont the drainage is to the eastward, emptying into the Hocking at lyancaster. Between Delmont and Ivancaster the valley is filled to a considerable depth with heavy and irregular deposits of drift into which the streams have cut deep trenches. From Delmont a small stream also drains to the westward into Muddy Prairie Creek of which more will be said later. The divide at Delmont between the two is very low and scarcely noticeable on passing over it on the railroad. Delmont is proba- bly the site of an old col. The depth of drift over this col is unknown, but less than half a mile to the west, at the school- house and also at a point a short distance east of the schoolhouse at an elevation about the same as that of Delmont, wells were sunk to a depth of about 180 feet and no rock was encountered. These wells are not situated in the center of the valley but near the north wall. It is possible that, after the blocking by the ice front of the old outlet of Clear Creek toward the northwest, and prior to the cutting down of the old col near the present mouth of Clear Creek, the waters of this region had an outlet over a low col at Delmont, and might have eroded it to a considerable depth. The ice, advancing farther, might have blocked this outlet and caused the cutting down of the col on the lower part of Clear Creek. Muddy Prairie Creek, as has been mentioned, rises in the valley at Delmont on the western side of a low drift divide. It flows southwestward, in places cutting deeply into the drift filling. About two miles southeast of Delmont it leaves this broad valley and enters a narrow one between high hills, in spite of the fact that the drift divide between it and Clear Creek is only a few feet high ; it is so low, in fact, that when it was proposed to drain Muddy Prairie, a large peat swamp formerly existing in the stream near this point, the engineers advised cutting through this divide to Clear Creek. The valley which it follows into the hills is only a few hundred feet in width, and an observer standing in the broad valley which the stream has just left and facing the entrance into the hills would not even suspect that it was any- thing but a ver}^ short tributar}- coming in at this point. It is borilered by terraces of roughly stratified drift 60 to 100 feet or even more above the present floor. The soil on the flood- plain is peaty and the stream very sluggish, in places cutting only a few inches below the surface. There are no wells from which the depth of drift beneath the valley floor could be obtained. The stream continues in this way with no noticeable variation in the width of its valley for a distance of a mile, when it widens some- what and becomes more rapid, but half a mile beyond is suddenly 154 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. contracted to a width of 40 or 50 3'ards only and flows on a rock floor between rock walls. After emerging from this gorge, it turns to the south into a broad valle}- in which it continues to Clear Creek. One would naturalh- suppose that this was the site of an old col, but if the observer takes the trouble to climb the hill to the west of this narrow channel, he will find that it is of drift and stands direct h' across the valley, forcing the stream against the east wall to such an extent that it has cut a channel in the rock at that point. This drift dam is 75 to 100 feet or more in height and composed of roughh^ stratified gravel, a well sunk on its summit about the middle of the valley having gone to a depth of 100 feet with no rock. Below this dam the valley widens out but drift deposits have forced the stream at almost all points to the eastern wall. Fig. J. Olil col oil Arney Creek at "Jacob's Ladder." There can be little doubt that the headwaters of this stream formerly drained into Clear Creek by the valley extending to Amanda, and that the ice has forced it over a col into the prestnt system. The col was probably very low and possibly did not ri-e far, if at all, above the present floor. It is difficult to locate, but from the direction of tributary streams and the general contour of the valley, it would seem that it was probably less than a mile below the point where Muddy Prairie Creek enters the hills. Arney Creek rises on the eastern side of a low divide at Ham- burg and flows northeast toward Lancaster. For a distance of May, 1904.] Changes in the Drainage Near Lancaster. 155 two miles the valley widens normally, when it has a width of half a mile or more ; then the stream turns to the south, the valley growing narrower, and just below Christmas rocks turns sharply to the west. The valley now becomes a gorge and a mile below the last turn there is no flood-plain and the walls rise abruptly to a height of 300 feet, the north wall, known in the region as Jacob's Ladder, presenting a vertical rock cliff in the upper 100 feet, from the top of which a splendid wiew can be obtained of the surrounding country and the gorge below^ Figs. 3 and 4, taken at the turn near Christmas rocks and from positions only 200 3'ards apart, contrast the character of the valley at the gorge and above it. Below this constriction the valle}' widens and con- tinues to Clear Creek, three miles distant. -Fig'. 4. Valley of Arney Creek above the col, looking towards Lancaster. Returning to the point where the stream turns toward the south and its valley first begins to narrow, a broad valley contin- ues in a northeast direction and joins the Hocking valley at Lan- caster, where it is fully a mile wide, but Arney Creek is barred from this outlet by a drift dam 20 to 75 feet high extending across the valley in a northeast-southwest direction with a well defined, rather abrupt front. This is of till as is shown in a nearby railroad cutting, and is one of the ridges of the terminal moraine of the Late Wisconsin ice epoch. Half a mile to the south of this deposit is a second, not very well defined, broad, low ridge of similar material which probably represents the outer- most limit of that ice sheet at this point. Between the dam and 156 The Ohio Naturalist [Vol. IV, No. 7, Lancaster the valley is filled with irregular drift deposits in which a small, northward flowing stream and its tributaries have cut deep trenches with narrow flood-plains. Prior to the advance of the ice there was a divide at Jacob's Ladder, one stream flowing to Clear Creek, another toward Lan- caster. The ice advanced as far as the drift dam and jtood at this point for some time, blocking the outlet and forcing the stream over the col at Jacob's Ladder. This, in time, was cut to the present level. While in this position, the ice deposited the debris in the mouth of the valley which prevented the return of the stream to the old channel after the advent of a milder climate and the retreat of the ice. Below the col, as mentioned before, the valle}' again broadens, and at the point where it enters Clear Creek is about half a mile wide. In the immediate vicinity of the col there is no drift, but about one mile below drift terraces occur on both sides, the one on the west being more prominent. From this point to the mouth of the valley the stream has been forced b)- the ice to the east wall and flows in a narrow flood-plain, in at least one place pass- ing over a rock bottom where it has been forced over a shelf. The valley west of the narrow flood-plain is occupied by drift deposits 50 to 100 feet above the stream. About one and one-half miles below the col a tributary- enters from the east. Its valley whore it joins Arney Creek is about 300 yards in width, but it has been so blocked up at this point that the stream has been forced to cut a channel in the rock of the north wall. This channel is 100 feet deep, 200 yards long and barely wide enough for the small streamlet and a narrow wagon road. The sides are of rock and very steep. Much of the dam remains in the form of drift on the northern side of the valley just south of the rock channel, but .it the southern side whatever blocked the old outlet has been removed, and there is an opening 100 yards wide where the dam is onh* a few feet above the present level of the tributary. At no pohit is the dam as high as the deepest part of the rock gorge. It is probable that ice which melted afterward aided greatly in blocking the old channel. It is possible that this dam is the extreme outer limit of the Late Wisconsin ice sheet at this point, as drift deposits to the west are abundant and uninterrupted while to the east they art- unknown to the writer. Hunter's Run, in the lower part of its course occupies the east- ern end of the valley extending from Lancaster to Amanda wliich has been mentioned. About three miles southwest of Lancaster, as it enters this valley it passes through a narrow constriction between two high sandstone hills. Above this point the valley is not so well defined. There are rock hills on the south, but looking toward the north from these hills, one is impressed by May, 1904] List of Mosses. 157 the low, rolling country which sinks gradually to the level of the Hocking valley several miles distant. It seems quite probable that the drainage above the constriction was formerly carried to the northward into Hocking, but the region was not studied closely and the course of the old outlet is undetermined. LIST OF THE MOSSES OF CUYAHOGA AND OTHER COUNTIES OF NORTHERN OHIO. Edo Claassen. This list is the result of the author's moss-collecting excursions during the last eight years ; it may, consequently, be expected to fairly represent the moss-flora of Cuyahoga county, as also the greater part of that of the surrounding counties. Mau)^ species were found many times in the same county, others but once in the same county or even in all the counties together, and while many may be new to the flora of the respective counties, several are new to the State, as, fc!' instance, DicrancUa airvafa, Hypinim ochraceitm and Mnimii Dnnnunvidii. Although almost all the species could be and were collected in the fruiting condition, there were several that were never seen with sporophj^tes, as, for instance, Euryuc/iiinii Boscii, HyloconiiiDU splcndens, Hypniiiii Sc/irebeii Q.\\d Myitrclla Cany ana. It ma}^ be added, that all the species enumerated below are represented in the author's herba- rium, often in several c many packages from the same count)', and that the list-nam'^s of the mosses are those accepted in Le^quereux & James' Manual and in Barnes' Keys. [The letters follow" "g the species names stand for the counties, as follows : C — Cuyahoga ; E — Erie ; G— Geauga ; L — Lake ; M — Medina ; O — Ottawa ; P — Portage ; S — Summit.] I. SPHAGNALES. Sphagnum ciispidatum Ebrh., G. cyinbifolium Ehrh., C, G., P., S. II. BRYALES. I. Cleistocarpi. Ephemerum serratum Hanipe, C. Pleuridium alternifolium Brid., C. 2. Stegocarpi. a. Acrocarpi. Atrichum angustatum Br. & Sch., C. undulatum Beauv., C. Presented at the November meeting of the Ohio State Academy of Science. 158 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 7, Aulacomnium heterostichum Br. & Sch., C, L., S. palustre Schwaegr., C, G., L., P. Barbula mucronifolia Br. & Sch., C. ruralis Hedw., E. unguiculata Hedw., C, L. Bartramia pomiformis Hedw., C , L. Bryum argenteum L , C, L. bimum Schreb., C, E., P. caespiticiutn L., C, L. intermedium Br id., C, O. roseum Schreb., C, L,., O., S. Ceratodon purpureus Brid., C, E., G., S. Desmatodon arenaceus Sull. & Lesq., C, L., O. Dicranella curvata Schimp., C. heteronialla Schimp., C. rufescens Schimp., C. varia Schimp., C. Dicranum flagellare Hedw., C, L,. fulvum Hook., C , L. scoparium Hedw., C, L. Didymodon rubellus Br. & vScli., C. DiphAScium foliosum IVIohr, C. Discehvim nudum Brid., C. Ditrichum pallidum (Hampe), C. tortile (vSchrad.), C. Drummondia clavellata Hook., C. Fissidens adiaiitoides Hedw., C, O. incurvus Schwaegr., C. obtusifolius Wils., C. subbasilaris Hedw., C. tauifoHus Hedw., C. , L, O. Fontinali.s antipj-retica gigantea Sull., C, E. Funaria hygrometrica Sibth., C, L., V. Grimmia apocarpa Hedw., C, O Gymnostomum calcareum Nees & Hornsch, C. curvirostrum Hedw., C, L. rupestre Schwaegr., C. Hedwigia ciliata Ehrh., C, G., L., S. I/Cptobryum pyriforme Schimp., C, L., O., S. Leucobryum glaucimi Schimp., C. Mnium affine Bland, C, L. cu.spidatum Hedw., C, P., S. Drummondii Br. & Sch., C. ]nuictatum Hedw., C. rostratum Schwaegr., C. serratum Laicli., C, L. May, 1904] List of Mosses. i59 Orthotrichum anomaliim Hedw., O. strangulatum Beaiiv., C, G. , M. Philonotis fontana Br id., C, G., L. Physcomitrium immersum SulL, C, G. Uirbinatuni Muell., C. Pogonatum brevicaule Beauv., C, L. Polytrichum commune L., C, G., L., P. juniperinuin Willd., C, P. ohioense Ren. & Card., G., L., P., S. Schistostega osmundacea Web. & Mohr, G. Tetraphis pellucida Hedw., C, P., S. Timmia megapolitana Hedw., C, S. Ulota crispa Brid., C. Hiitchinsiae Schimp., C. Webera albicans Schinip., C. elongata Schwaegr., L. nutans Hedw., C, P., S. Weisia viridula Brid., C. b. Plciirocarpi. Amblystegium adnatum Hedw., C. compactum C. IMuell., C, G. confervoides (Br.) Br. & Sch., C. irriguum (Wils. ) Br. & Sch., C, S. " spinifolium Schimp., C. minutissimum (S. iS: L.) Jaeg. & Sauerb., C. noterophilum (Sull.) Holzinger, C. riparium (Hedw.) Br. & Sch., C, P., S. fluitans (L. & J.) R. & C, C. serpens (Hedw.) Br. & Sch , C, I.., M. P. varium (Hedw.) Lindb., C, L., M., P. Anacaniptodon sjjlachnoides Brid., C. Anomodon attenuatus Hueben., C, M. obtusifolius Br. & Sch., C. rostratus Schimp., C, S. Brachythecium acuminatum Br. & Sch., C. laetum Br. & Sch., C. plumosum Br. & Sch., C rutabuhim Br. & Sch., C. salebrosum Br. & vSch. , C, M. vekitinum Br. & Sch., C. M. Climacium americanum Brid., C, E., G., L., S. Cylindrothecium cladorrhizans Schimp., C, L,., M., P. Eurynchium Boscii (Schwaegr.) Schimp., C. hians (Hedw.) Br. & Sch., C, L. piliferum (Schreb.) Br. &Sch., C, L. strigosum (Hoffm.) Br. & Sch., C, E., L., S. i6o The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 7, Hoinalotheciiim subcapillatum Sull., C. Hylocomium Ijrevirostrum Br. & Sell., C, L. splendens Br. & Sch., C. triguetrum Br. & Sch., C. H}^pnum chrysophA-llum Brid., C, O. crista-castrensis L., C. cupressiforme L., C, G., L., M. " uucinatulum Br. & Sch., C. curvifoliuni Hedw., C, G. Haldanianum Grev., C, L,. hispidulum Brid., C, L. imponens Hedw., C, P., S. nioUuscum Hedw., C, L. ochraceum Turn., C. pratense Koch, C. rugosum L, C, S. Schreberi Willd., C, G., Iv. uncinatum Hedw., C. Leskea obscura Hedw., C. polycarpa Ehrh., C, E., G. Leucodon julaceus Sulhv., C, E., O. Mj-urella Carejana Sulliv., C. Neckera pennata Hedw. , C. Plagiothecium denticulatum Br. & Sch., C, L. SuUivantiae Schimp., C, L,., S. sylvaticuin Br. & Sch., C, G., L., P., S. Platygyrium repens Br. & Sch., C, L. Pylaisia intricata Br. & Sch., C, E., G., L. vehitina Br. & Sch., C. Raphidostegium demissum (Wils. ) , C. microcarpum (^luell.) , C. Rhynchostegmiii rusciforme Br. & Sch., C, G., S. serrulatum (Hedw.) Schimp., C, L. Thelia asprella Sulliv., C, E., L. hirtella Sulliv., C, G. Thuidium Blandovii Br. & Sch., G., L. delicatuluin Br. & Sch , C. microphylhnn (Sw.) Best, C. minutuluin Br. & Sch., C, L. paludo.sum (Sull.) Rau. & Herv., C, G., M., P. reco<;nituni Lindb., C, E., L., S. ;[Cleveland, O.] May, 1904.] The Breeding Habits of the Myrio^od. i6i THE BREEDING HABITS OF THE MYRIOPOD, FONTARIA INDIANAE. Max Morse. There are in Ohio, three species of the genus Fontaria and further work will probably discover one or two others. The spe- cies under consideration is limited in its range in the State to the northern third, or perhaps it descends no farther southward than the latitude of Bucyrus. The species indianae Bollman, is about two inches in length. The ground color is yellowish brown above while the ventral parts are uniform light yellow. Dorsally, the posterior edges of the .segments are bounded by lighter yellow, similar to that of the ventral parts. The head is uniform brown. These considerations will distinguish the genus from any other in the State. The present species is distinguishable from the other species by the fact that in the male the genital hooks are curved inward, i. e., toward one another. The form is the nar- rowest of those of the species found in the State, the pleura of the segments not being bent outward as in the other species, but rather bent downward to quite a degree. The observations on which the present paper is based were all made near Sandusk}^, Ohio, and niainlj^ on Cedar Point, during the summers of 1900, 1901, 1902 and 1903. The animals began to leave their winter quarters about the first of May or, in some years, earlier when the temperature had been higher for several weeks. Often after leaving the fallen leaves, etc., under which they pass the winter, thej^ were forced to again bury themselves owing to cold periods. As soon as summer sets in in earnest, the myriopods are quite common. They are to be seen running here and there over the sand in the daylight hours, but from the tracks left in the sand it is evident that the}' are active during the night. This is rendered certain by finding adults running about during the night when, b}- means of a lantern, the sand is illuminated, and also by finding a labyrinth of tracks on the sand which, dur- ing the late afternoon and evening, has been swept smooth b}' a storm, thus obliterating the tracks made during the day. It is very probable that their activities during the night are directed towards foraging for food. Up until the middle of July, while the species is common every- where, yet only isolated individuals are seen. After that date, however, they apparently congregate and are found associated together. An examination showed that these collections were not of either one sex, but were made up of individuals of both sexes. Soon, however, the sexes pair off and are found in the tall grass that borders the south beach of Cedar Point which is washed Read at the November meeting of the Ohio State Academy of Science. 1 62 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 7, b}^ Sandusky Bay. Here the^^ lay their eggs immediately, except when the weather becomes cold, as during the summer of 1903. For weeks during that summer, there were strong winds from the west and northwest that drove a heavy surf against the beach mentioned. Moreover, the major portion of the season during which oviposition generally takes place, remained cold and cloud3\ The result was that the myriopods did not lay their eggs until late. During the latter part of July and the first of August, adults were not to be seen, as during hot summers like that of 1902, running about in groups on the sand, but were found hud- dled together in numbers under the dead marsh grass and debris that covered the bay beach above the wash of the waves. For a short while in the second week in August, some were found pairing in the grass farther towards the middle of the Point, and a little later, several nests were discovered. The nests are built in loose sand, preferably that when mixed with a little loam and alwaj'S soil that is somewhat damp. The nests are dug by the female while the male is mounted. She uses her anterior appendages to dig the hole, passing the dirt upward to the open- ing of the hole by means of the remaining appendages. She removes the dirt until she has made a cavit}' a little greater than the width of her body and about two inches in depth. When the greatest depth has been reached that she is to make the hole, she widens out a cave-like terminus which reaches a diameter of about half an inch. She is now ready to deposit the eggs. To under- stand this process, it is necessary to keep in mind that the exter- nal generative opening of the female is on the second body seg- ment. Hence the female is enabled to deposit the eggs without withdrawing from the hole. The eggs are fastened to the walls of the enlargement at the base of the tubular nest, and after she has lined the cavit}^ she keeps on depositing eggs until she has made four or five layers of eggs. Sometimes the whole of the enlargement is filled, but generally there is a lumen in the center of the mass of eggs. There is no evidence furnished by the present observations for the statement made by some authors' that the female guards the nest after she has deposited her eggs. Of the many cases watched, none of the females nor males remained in the vicinity of the nest after the egg-laying had been completed. The mouth of the nest was in each case left uncovered, but usually, by chance, the open- ing became stopped up either by rain or wind or some other factor. Young specimens were found during the whole of the summer amongst the adults. The.se immature individuals ranged in length from three-quarters of an inch to full size. In color they differed I. Korschelt and Heider, ICmbryology of Invert. Vol. Ill, p. 218. May, 1904.] Deciduous Leaves. 163 decidedly from the adults, being clay colored, the bands on the posterior borders of the terga in the adults being represented by paler markings in these immature specimens. By successive moultings, they increased in size and after several weeks became colored like the adults when kept in the open air or in sunlight. Experiments on the young at different stages failed to bring out the adult colors until the normal length had been attained. The eggs lie over winter and the larvae emerge in the following spring as minute white bodies which grow quickh^ into the 3'oung described above. DECIDUOUS LEAVES. John H. Schaffner. Plants have alternating periods of rest and activity. In our latitude these periods usually correspond to the alternating con- ditions of day and night and to the seasons of the year. The active growing period usually occurs in the summer or the rainy season and the inactive one corresponds to the cold or dry season. Where the seasons are so marked as in Ohio one takes it as quite natural that there should be a resting period in the winter. But many plants pass into a period of rest even if growing in an envi- ronment perennially favorable. Thus it is very common for complete defoliation to take place in many plants of the tropics. It is said that there are nearly two hundred species in Ceylon which become leafless at different times of the year. The state- ment is made that there is not a month when all the trees are in full leaf. It is evident, therefore, that in many cases the period of rest and the deciduous habit are independent of climatic condi- tions no difference how the character was originally acquired. In our own plants the influence of cold is no doubt predominant. The injuries of winter are not only due to the direct effect of cold upon the protoplasm, but also to the loss of water. With the approach of autumn, the chilled roots are unable to sujDply the necessar}^ amount of water for the transpiration going on above ; consequently there is a great advantage in reducing the transpira- tion surface by shedding the leaves. Thus we might say that the casting of the leaves is an adjustment to a more limited water supply. Plants ma}^ of course go into a period of rest without shedding their leaves, as in our common Conifers. In most cases, however, there is a great change in the body of the plant or some of its parts to prepare for the severe conditions. The annuals die completely and the only resting period is in the seed. The bien- nials usually grow but little after the cold becomes severe. The greater number of geophilous plants die to the ground. The woody plants and a few herbs have mostly learned to endure the 164 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, Ko. 7, winter by specially developed stems, the leaf which represents the active transpiring and food manufacturing organ being usually shed. The methods by which the leaves are separated from the stem are various. Some plants like the Hemlock shed them after ihey are several j^ears old. Others like the Pines get rid of the foliage leaves by pruning ofE dwarf branches of a certain age. Some like the Bald Cypress and Tamarix drop the dwarf branches and smaller twigs with the leaves at the end of each growing season ; so the plant has no leaves in the winter. But the common waj^ is for the leaves alone to be separated from the branches. A cleavage plane is formed usually at the base of the petiole and the leaf then falls away. The separation layer is gradually devel- oped between the vascular bundles and epidermis, and finall}-, when the cleavage is nearly complete the merest puff of wind will break the woody strands and carry the leaf away. The casting of the leaf, however, is not a sudden process but preparatory' changes are going on in its tissues for some time before it is detached. In many cases anthocyan and other color- ing matters are developed to protect the chlorophyll and proto- plasm while the food material is being transferred to the stem. After the cleavage plane is formed a heavy frost will help to break awaj' the fragile woody strands which still hold the leaf in place. This is very apparent in such trees like the White Mul- berry, which may put off its entire leaf dress in a single day after a frosty autumn night. There is much difference in the time of casting the leaf. The Ohio Buckeye, Juneberry, Walnuts, and Hickories are among the first to shed their leaves. The Cotton- wood and Chestnut Oak shed their leaves very gradually ; and some of the Oaks are among the last of the trees to be bare. The Shingle Oak drops few leaves before late in the winter, although they dry off, and it is not completely denuded until about the first of April. It is interesting to note the several ways in which the cleavage planes are produced. In plants with simple leaves a separation layer is more commonly formed at the base of the petiole very close to the stem, as in the Elm, Maple, Oak, and Catalpa. In some, however, two cleavage planes are produced, one at the base of the jjetiole and the other at the outer end just at the base of the blade. This is strikingl}- shown in Ampelopsis tricuspidata and A. cordata. The blade drops off some time before the petiole, so that in certain 3-ears a vine of A. tricusj)idata may shed nearl}- all of its blades before the petioles begin to fall making a rather unique appearance. The same adaptation is present in the various species of Grape. There is probably considerable advantage to the plant in such an arrangement, for the food in the large peti- ole, which is in much less danger of freezing than the blade, may May, 1904.] Deciduous Leaves. 165 thus have a longer time to be withdrawn into the stem. In the Catalpa, for instance, the blades often freeze and dry up in the fall while the petioles are still green and active. It would evi- dently be better if the useless blade were cut off by a cleavage plane so as not to hinder the work of the petiole. In compound leaves the leaflets are usually- shed singly. The leaflets of such palmate leaves as in the Virginia Creeper and the various Buckeyes are cut off some time before the petiole. Pin- nately compound leaves ha\ e various peculiarities. In such forms as Rhus glabra the leaflets are separated by cleavage planes but no transverse cleavage joints are formed in the main rachis which persists for some time. In other forms, like in Fraxinus quad- rangulata and Staphylea, not only are the leaflets cut off by cleavage planes but there is a series of cleavage joints formed in the rachis at the insertion of each pair of leaflets and thus the main rachis of the leaf drops off piece by- piece. Decompound leaves often form an elaborate sy'stem of separation layers. A good example of this is shown in the leaf of the Honey L,ocust. First the numerous leaflets drop off, the main rachis and the side branchlets remaining on the tree for some time. Next the side branchlets begin to fall, and finally the whole rachis is separated. One may well a.sk the meaning of such an elaborate system of cleavage planes when one amputation at the base of the petiole would be sufficient. There is no doubt but that the green rachis and petiole may continue, to a limited extent at least, the process of photosynthesis ; and as stated above, by means of a gradual cutting away of the large leaf surface the more exposed parts are removed first and there is a better opportunity for the withdrawal of the food present into the stem. A very interesting condition is present in the Green Briers. The leaf of Smilax hispida has two tendrils near the base of the petiole and these, of course, hold the plant to its support. Evi- dently if the leaf were shed in the usual way the whole vine would fall to the gouna in the winter. There is a more or less perfect brittle layer formed in the petiole just a little beyond the two tendrils where the leaf finally breaks off, leaving the petiole base with the tendrils intact. Most of the leaves hang on until after December i, though usually frozen before this time. The development of a brittle layer in the petiole of this plant seems to be quite a modern adaptation. Smilax glauca, S. rotundafolia, and S. bona-nox show the same peculiarity. The genus Rubus represents another group of plants which .shed their leaves by a break in the petiole, leaving the base on the stem. In this case there are no tendrils and the only apparent advantage to the plant is the protection of the bud or tender part in the axil of the leaf. The adaptation, however, may have no other significance than one of the po.ssible ways in which the plant was able to get rid of its 1 66 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 7, leaves. Among the species which show this peculiarity' well are Riibus odoratus, R. strigosus, R. occidentalis, R. nigrobacciis, and R. invisus. In the common Mock Orange, Philadelphus coronarius, the cleavage plane is formed a little above the base of the petiole which remains as a protection to the axillary bud. There are certain plants which have the hal^it of covering their axillary buds with the base of the petiole. The Sycamore, Plat- anus occidentalis, presents a very perfect example of this adapta- tion. The reason for such a peculiarity is not easy to see. It maj' be for protection, or again as in Rhus glabra it may prevent the development of too many lateral buds into branches. But there ma}' be no special advantage whatever. It may be a mere incident to the adjustment of the leaf to the surrounding tissues. Other plants which cover their lateral buds are Cladrastis lutea, Rhus hirta, R. copallina, Acer negundo, Ptelea trjfoliata, Gledit- sia triacanthos, Robinia pseudacacia, R. viscosa, and R. hispida. In Gleditsia and Robinia there are a number of superposed buds only part of which may be covered. The undersigned wishes to make a census by counties of the pteridophytes of Ohio. To further this aim, the cooperation of every science teacher and fern student is asked. Specimens with full and exact data are desired and will be identified or referred to some competent authority. Unless otherwi.se provided for all duplicate specimens will be sent to state herbarium, O. S. U. Address June 15th to August loth. University of Wooster, O. Lewis S. Hopkins, Troy, Ohio. Date of Pnblication of May Number, May 1, 1904. The Ohio ^J\(^aturalist, PUBLISHED BY The Biological Club of the Ohio State University, Volume IV. JUNE, 1904. No. 8. TABLE OF CONTENTS York— The Embryo-sae and Embryo of Neluinljo 167 OsEOEX — Formal Opening of the Lake Laboratory Bnilding 177 Kellerjian and Jennings— Flora of Cedar Point 186 Kellerjian— Flora of Hen and Chicken Islands, 190:-! 190 ScHAFFNER— The Jacket Layer in Sassafras 192 FiiANK- Meetings of the Biological Club 193 THE EMBRYO=SAC AND EMBRYO OF NELUMBO.^^^ Harlan H. York. Siuce the publication of Lyon's studies on Nelunibo and Cook's work on Castalia and Nymphaea, the systematic position of the Nymphyaeaceae has again become a prominent question. Owing to the variety of opinions held' ,in regard to the classification of this group, it was thought desirable to continue the study of the life history of Nelumbo lutea, s^lhoi-^g'h this plant has been described more or less completely a|||umber of times. Material was collected during July-and August, 1902, in San- dusk}' Ba}-, near the Ohio State University Lake Laboratory, at Sandusky, Ohio. Flemming's stronger and weaker solutions and chromo-acetic solution were used as killing and fixing agents. On examining the ovules, it was found that in most cases the tissues had not been properly penetrated b}' these fluids. In the summer of 1903 more material was collected, near the place already mentioned, which was killed and fixed in Kleincn- berg's picro-acetic and picro-sulphuric solutions and was found to be preserved in good condition. The ovules were passed through the alcohols, imbedded in paraffin, and serial sections were cut 10-12 mic. thick. For staining several reagents were used : Delafield's heamotoxylin, Heidenhain's iron alum haemo- toxylin, analiu safranin and gentian violet. All of these stains were successful, the last named stain giving the best results. Considerable difficulty was experienced, in that a great many ovules had failed to develop embryo-sacs and others had not been fertilized. Quite a large number of slides were prepared and most of the points mentioned were observed a number of times. This work was commenced under the direction of Prof. Mel. T. Cook in the De Pauw University Botanical Laboratory and * Contributions from the Botanical Laboratory of Ohio State University. XVII. 1 68 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 8, completed under Prof. John H. Schaffner in the Botanical Labor- ator}^ of Ohio State Universit}^ to both of whom I wish to express my sincere thanks. In Nelumbo, the carpels are situated in deep pits of the top- shaped receptacle. The stigma and the narrow canal which traverses the short style are covered with glandular cells which secrete a mucilagenous fluid at the time of pollination (Fig. 8). The ovule is suspended from the summit of the ovulary (Fig. i). Some time before the integuments begin to develop, the growth of the ovule is more rapid at one side ( Fig. r ) and anatrophy is well marked when the incipient seed-coats make their appearance. A single hypodermal archesporial cell can be easily distinguished from the adjacent cells by its larger size and more granular cell contents (Fig. 2). Very earl}- in its development, it divides by a transverse wall into an upper cell, the primary parietal cell and a lower cell, the megasporocyte (Fig. 3). By a series of divisions of the primary parietal cell, a large parietal tissue of twelve cells, arranged in three tiers of four cells each, is formed (Fig. 5). The megasporocyte expands almost equally in all directions. The divisions of the megasporocyte were not followed, but four megaspores are formed. The lowest one becomes the functional megaspore while the others degenerate (Fig. 6). By the further division of the parietal tissue and the epidermis at the tip of the nucellus, the functional megaspore becomes deeply placed in the ovule (Fig. 7.) The nucleus of the functional megaspore now divides into two (Fig. 9), four (Fig. 10), and eight nuclei respectively, producing the eight-celled embryo-sac (Fig. 11). Frequently great irregularities in the development of the embryo- sac were present. In many cases two or more imperfect sacs were observed. Usually there was one complete sac with one or more imperfectly developed sacs. By the appearance of the prepara- tions, it seems that the extra sacs are derived from sister mega- spores, rather than from independent megasporocytes (Fig. 15.) The embryo-sac developes very rapidly and is usuall}^ straight. It enlarges principally in the direction of its longer axis, destroy- ing the parietal cells above and encroaching on the ovular tissue below. The antipodals are small (Fig. 11) and usually disappear before the conjugation of the polar nuclei. In only a few instan- ces could any trace of them be found after the polar nuclei had conjugated. The synergids are small. They become slightly enlarged from their original condition, and are elongated trans- versely to the longer axis of the sac. They degenerate about the time of fertilization or .soon after (Fig. 12). The egg becomes quite large and usually is placed considerably to one side of the sac (Fig. 13). The polar nuclei begin to conjugate about the time the flower opens and the fusion is not complete until after fertilization. In June, 1904.] The Embryo- sac and Embryo of Nelumbo. 169 approaching each other, the lower polar nucleus travels much farther than the upper one and the fusion usually occurs near the Qgg or even in contact with it (Fig. 13). Quite a number of examples of a triple fusion were found. In many of the prep- arations in which the pollen tube had appeared, two of the nuclei were about the same size while the third one was smaller (Fig. 14). Several other examples were found where there were three conjugating nuclei, almost equal in size and similar in appearance even before the pollen tube had appeared. It seems that in the first instance where fertilization had occurred, the small nucleus of the three conjugating nuclei represents the second male cell and that there is here a true case of what has been called double fertilization ; while in the second instance the conjugating nuclei were embr5'0-sac nuclei, since the pollen tube had not yet entered the sac. Soon after the eight-celled sac is formed it begins to grow very rapidly in the direction of the longitudinal axis of the ovule. The c^lls of the tissue below the antipodal region of the sac become greatly enlarged and between them are large intercellular spaces. Usually there is a single row of cells very rich in cyto- plasm, which becomes very prominent in the preparations because of its deep stain. This row extends downward from the base of the sac toward the lower end of the ovule (Fig. 14). The cells surrounding this axial row become much larger in sizi and then disintegrate, leaving a large space filled with thin cytoplasm (Fig. 18). The cytoplasm of the embrj'o-sac extends down to the axial row of cells ( Fig. 14). These central cells are present some time after the adjacent cells have disappeared, and since they are rich in cytoplasm, it seems that they serve as a conduct- ing passage for food from the lower ovular tissue to the cytoplasm above, which in turn carries the food to the egg apparatus. After fertilization the axial row begins to degenerate and then disappears entirely, leaving a cavity reaching far back into the tissue of the ovule (Fig. 21 ) Sometimes the nuclei of the axial row of cells become active and divide (Fig. 20), and are after- wards found massed together in the lower part of the cavity after their walls have disappeared (Fig. 21). The cavity formed by the disintegration of the cells below the antipodal region enlarges greatly while the embryo is developing and into it the two basal lobes of the embryo are rapidly extended, their outer surface lying in contact with the walls of the cavity. The first division of the definitive nucleus occurs about the time of the formation of the two-celled embryo and a very delicate wall is formed between the two daughter nuclei which divides the embr3'o-sac into two chambers. A division of one of the two endosperm nuclei thus formed takes place and a second wall is formed across the sac so that there are then three superposed I70 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 8, compartments (Fig. 24), It seems that all three of the daughter nuclei continue to divide until the whole sac is filled with endo- sperm extending far down into the space formed by the dissolu- tion of the tissue of the ovule below the base of the embryo-sac (Fig, 27). The development of the endosperm, after the three- celled stage, begins at the upper end, but there is no large vesicu- lar cell developed at the lower end of the sac, as Cook reported for Castalia odorata. At first the endosperm cells are quite large, but as the division continues the cells become much smaller, walls continue to be formed between the dividing nuclei until the endosperm is fully developed, no free cell formation taking place, so far as observed, at an}- stage of the process. The history of the embryo as followed is the same as reported by Ivyon. After fertilization, the oospore continues to occupy the same position as the oosphere and it enlarges somewhat before it divides (Fig. 13). Although no two-celled embryo was ob- served, it is evident that the first division of the oospore is b)' the formation of a transverse wall. Then by the formation of a longitudinal wall in each of the two cells, a quadrant is formed (Fig. 23). Although this is the typical course of development, very frequentl}^ the divisions are different. The lower cell often divides by a transverse wall, thus forming a tier of three cells in the proembryo (Fig. 22). By the formation of longitudinal walls in the quadrant, the embr3-o passes into the octant stage. In ca.se of a more irregular development, the three cells of the embryo arranged in a row, divided by longitudinal walls, making a .six-celled embryo (Fig. 25). Whether the early development is typical or irregular, a series of divisions follows by which a spherical embryo of .several hundred cells is formed (Figs. 26-29. ) No suspensor cell is present; so the j-oung embryo lies against the nucellus at the micropylar end and is almost surrounded b}^ endosperm tissue (Fig. 27). When the spherical embryo has reached its maxinuun growth, it becomes flattened at the outer end by the development of a collar-like ridge extending about two-thirds of the way around (Figs. 30, 31 and 32). This is followed by the outgrowth of a small protuberance from the flat- tened side about parallel with the apex of the ovule. After the formation of the crescent- shaped ridge, the development continues at the opposite side, giving rise to the two "cotyledonar}' " lobes of the embryo (Fig. 33 J. The two lobes grow downward very rapidly outside the endo.sperm, the tissue of the ovule rapid]>- disappearing before them. In the meanwhile, the endosperm has formed a sac-like mass of tissue around the embryo and extends down into the cavity of the embryo-sac to the disorganizing tissue below. In the meantime the growth of the plumule has been very slow, being a dome-shaped projection of tissue occupying a central position between the lobes but to one side of the axis of June, 1904.] The Embryo-sac and Embryo of Nelumbo, 171 the embryo (Fig. 33.) Both the cotjdedonar}' ridge and the incipient stem tip come from the outer end of the embryo and probably represent terminal structures, but the stem tip represents the more central mass of cells. On account of the spherical con- dition of the embryo it is practically impossible to trace the origin of any set of cells which appear at the outer end of the more mature embryo, and the cotyledonary ridge maj- be lateral. After the cotyledonary lobes have become greatl}- enlarged the incipient plumule continues its development. It grows downward, forcing its way into the center of the mass of endosperm which lies between the two cotyledonary lobes. The first leaf and stem tip develop side by side from the terminal mass of cells in the protruberance. The leaf arises on the side opposite the cotyle- donar)' ridge (Fig. 34). The second leaf arises on the side of the plumule opposite the first and develops more slowh' than the first leaf. The comparative growth and manner of development may be seen from Figs. 35-40. The radicle has its origin at the base of the plumule. It is a vestigial organ and does not develop on the sprouting of the seed. It can only be seen at a late stage of development and is enclosed by an outgrowth from the sur- rounding tissue (Fig. 40). The homology between the development of the embryo of Nelumbo and other monocot3dedonous embryos is very striking in many respects. In its early development the embryo of Ne- lumbo is very similar to those of Aglaonema, Diffenbachia, and Lysichiton. In these forms the oospore does not cut off a suspen- sor cell but builds up a spherical embryo as is formed in Nelumbo. In the forms described by Campbell, the egg may segment, first, by two transverse divisions before any vertical division, or a reg- ular quadrant may be formed, which is likewise true in Nelumbo. The development of the " cotyledonar}' " ridge shows a striking re>emblance to the hypocotyledonary expansion of various Helo- biae. The mature embryo may thus be compared wath those of Halophila, Ruppia, Zostera, and Phyllospadix. In these forms there is a broad expansion of tissue below the plumule. In Halo- phila, Ruppia, and Zosteria, the hypocotjdedonary lobe is contin- uous, while in Phyllospadix the structure is somewhat lobed if one may judge from the published figures and descriptions. The plumule with the so-called cotyledon is attached near the center. It is probable that the broad two-lobed expansion of tissue in the Nelumbo embryo commonly known as the cotyledons, is a true hypocotyledonary body as in the forms just mentioned. It bears a rather close resemblance to the hypocotyledonar}' expansion of Phyllospadix. If such a comparison is correct, the first leaf of Nelumbo is homologous with the so-called cot3dedon in Ruppia and Phyllospadix, and the plumule and cotyledon of the.se forms may arise as terminal structures side by side, as do the plumule 172 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. IV, No. 8, and "first leaf" of Nelumbo and the similar structures of the Araceae mentioned above. A careful study of all the Helobiae with " macropodous " embryos, as well as other monocotyledon- ous types, will probably be necessary before a definite conclusion can be reached. RECEJNT LITERATURE. Lyon, H. I,. Observations on the Embryogeny of Nelumbo. Minn. Bot. Studies. 2:643-655. 1901. CoOK, M. T. Development of the Embryo-sac and Embryo of Castnlia odorata and Nymphaea advena. Bull. Torr. Bot. Club. 24 : 211- 220. 1902. Murbj:ck, Sv. Ueber die Embryologie von Ruppia Rostellata Koch. Kongl. Svenska Vetenskapa-Akademiens Handlingar. Bandet 36. No. 5. 1902. Campbei,Iv, D. H. Notes on the Structure of the Embryo-sac in Spargani- um and Lysichiton. Bot. Gaz. 27 : 153-166. 1S99. Campbeli^, D. H. Studies on the Araceae. Ann. Bot. 14 : 1-25. 1900. SCHAFFNER, J. H. Some Morphological Peculiarities of the Nymphaeaceae and Helobiae. Ohio Nat. 4 : 83-92. 1904. EXPLANATION OF PLATES. The figures were drawn with the aid of an Abbe camera and the following combination of oculars and objectives: Figs. 2-7, 9-13, 20, 22, 23, 25 and 26, Bausch & Lomb yV obj., Leitz oc. 4 ; Figs. 15, 2S-32 and 34, Leitz 1 obj. and oc. 4 ; Figs. 14, 16-19 ^"d 33i Leitz \ obj. and oc. 2 ; Figs. 21, 24 and 27, Bausch & Lomb ^^ ohj. and oc. 2. PLATE XVI. Fig. I. Young carpel before the integuments appear on the ovule. Fig. 2. Nucellus with archesporial cell. Fig. 3. The megasporocyte and primary parietal cells. Fig. 4. Megasporocyte and three parietal cell. I'ig. 5. ^Megasporocyte and twelve parietal cells, six of which show in one plane. Fig. 6. The four megaspores, the lowest enlarging as the functional mega- spore. Fig. 7. The nucellus with cap of tissue developed from the epidermis. Fig. 8. Carpel with two celled embryo-sac in the ovule, showing the stylar canal lined with glandular cells. Fig. 9. Two-celled em])ryo-sac with remains of the three potential mega- spores. Fig. 10. Four-celled embryo-sac. I'ig. II. Eight-celled embryo-sac, showing conjugation of the polar nuclei and disorganization of the antijjodals. F'ig. 12, Upper end of embryo-sac, showing the oosphere, synergids and conjugating polar nuclei. Fig. 13. Upper end of embryo-sac, showing tripple fusion, the egg, remains of pollen tube, and synergid. June, 1904.] The Embryo-sac and Embryo of Neluvibo. 173 Plate xrr. { \vv.>~^. Leaf scars not surrounding the axillary buds and twigs not with peculiar rings. 80. SO. Base of petiole and stipules persisting, prominent, drying off; small shrubs. 81. 80 Petiole deciduous close to the brak, leaving a definite leaf scar. 82. 81. Bundle scars 3; pith large; bark not shreddy. RUBLTS. 81. Bundle scar 1; pith small; stipviles sheathing the stem; bark dark brown, shreddy. DASIPHORA. — 82 — 82. Bundle scar 1, or if several then closely crowded and confluent, appearing as 1. 83. 82. Bundle scars 3 or more, distinct. 96. S3. Climbing vines, the stems herbaceous above; young twigs gray pubescent. SOLANUM. 83. Stem climbing, woodv throughout; bark light gray; buds often clustered. LYCIUM. S3. Stem not climbing, woody throughout. 84. 84. Stipular scars or stipules present. 85. 84. No stipular scars or stipules. 87. 85. Terminal -bud present. 86. 85. Terminal bud absent; bud scales dark brown or black. RHAMNUS. SO. Stipules deciduous; low shrubs. CEANOTHUS. 80. Stipviles usually persistent, minute; erect shrubs. ILEX. 87. Terminal bud present. 88. 87. Terminal bud absent. 91. 88. Bark of twigs very spicy-aromatic, green; internodes very unequal. SASSAFRAS. 88. Bark not spicy-aromatic. 89. 89. Internodes very unequal ; bark brown or gray. AZALEA. 89. Internodes not verj^ unequal. 90. 90. Twigs glabrous, gray or blackish-brown. ILICIOIDES. 90. Twigs pubescent or tomentose, reddish or light-brown. SPIRAEA. 91. Trees with polished, greenish-brown, grayish-yellow, or red twigs; bark sour; leaf scar prominent, semi-oval, with a dark central scar usually in the form of a ring; buds small, not projecting much beyond the epidermis; the large terminal panicled raceme with capsules persisting all winter. OXYDENDRUM. 91. Trees with brown pubescent twigs; or shrubs. 92. 92.- Trees with 2 visible scales in the triangular flattened bud; pith often with lenticular cavities; twigs pubescent, zigzag at the tip. DIOSPYROS. 92. Low shrubs with several visible scales in the bud. 93. 93. Twigs finely white-speckled and granulated, green or reddish. VACCINIUM. 93. Twigs not white-speckled. 94. 94. Buds of two kinds, large flower buds with many visible scales and small ones with 2 outer scales. GAYLUSSACIA. 94. Buds all alike, with several scales. 95. 95. Surface of leaf scar rather even; self-pruning scars present; twigs reddish-ohve. POLYCODIUM. 95. Surface of leaf scar very uneven; no self-pruning scars; bud scales numerous. SPIR^A. 284 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. V, No. 4, — 96 — 96. Terminal bud absent. 97. 96. Terminal bud present. 101. 97. Stipules or stipular scars absent or indistinct. 98. 97. Stipules or stipular scars present. 99. 98. Leaf scar very narrow, almost a line, not decvirrent, extending half way around the stem; low shrubs or climbers. ROSA. 98 Leaf scar broad; twigs not glandular dotted; erect shrubs or trees. PRUNUS. 98. Leaf scar broad; yoving twigs glandular dotted; buds usually clus- tered at the tip. MYRICA. 99 Twigs glandular, dark, pubescent; buds globular; low shrubs. COMPTONL\. 99. Twigs not glandular 100. 100. Buds and twigs very downy, twigs dark brown or black. CYDONIA 100. Buds and twigs pubescent; twigs light or greenish brown. SORBARLV 100 Buds downv or pubescent; twigs glabrous or pubescent, grav or brown. RHAMNUS. 101. Twigs green or yellowish-green, glabrous; internodes very unequal; lateral buds minute; small trees. CORNLTS. 101. Twigs normally red above and green beneath, glabrous; bark very bitter; some axils with 2 or 3 hairy buds of nearly equal size; trees. AMYGDALUS. 101. Twigs not green or red and green unless the plants are low shrul)s, but gray, brown, black, or reddish. 102. 102. Bundle scars 5 or more in the broad U-shaped leaf scar; tips of the buds quite downv; small trees. SORBUS. 102. Bundle scars 3. 103. 103. Leaf scars very nari-ow, often a mere line extending half way or more around the stem, not decurrent ; low shrubs. ROSA. 103. Leaf scars rather broad often decurrent. 104. 1 04. Leaf scars strongly decurrent at the sides and middle ; bundle scars close together, the central one large; shrubs with brown twigs. OPUL ASTER. 104. Leaf scars not decurrent or if so then the bundle scars distinctly separated. 105. 105. Buds elliptic, lanceolate or lance-linear; shrubs. 106. 105. Buds ovate or depressed; mostly trees or tree-like. 107. IOC). Older bark shreddy; leaf scars somewhat decurrent at the middle and sides; l>ud scales very thin, light or dark brown. RlBIiS. IOC). Bark close; buds pale brown or red; leaf scars not decurrent; bud scales rather thick; twigs pubescent. ARONL\. 107. Buds rounded at the apex, often clustered at the tip of the twig; twigs glandular dotted. MYRICA. 107. Buds rounded at the apex; scales thick; twigs often zigzag; ])lant usually with some thorns, not glandular clotted. CRAT^4i;GUS. 107. Buds pointed; plants sometimes with thorn-like stunted branches, not glandular dotted. 108. 108. Bvids glabrous or slightly pubescent; twigs usually glabrous and slender, some shade of black, brown, or reddish, often with 2 or 3 axillary buds; some with self-pruning scars. PRUNUS. 108. Buds downy or strongly pubescent, conical, pungent; twigs gla- brous, mostly yellow-olive; trees with erect growth, the branches not spreading as in most of the apples. PYRUS. 108. Buds downy or strongly pubescent; twigs strongly pubescent or if glabrous then dark reddish-brown; trees with romided or spreading crowns. MALUS. Feb., 1905.] Key— Ohio Woody Plants. 285 — 109 — 109. Pith large, white, with cavities or more or less diaphragmed ; twigs robust, gray, with large lenticels; bundle scars in a ring in the large leaf scar; trees. PAULOWNIA. 109, Leaves with tendrils on the persistent petiole which shows 2 leaflet scars at the end; climbing vines with rather large, sometimes hollow pith. BIGNONIA. 109. Pith not diaphragmed nor with lenticular cavities; petioles not with tendrils. 110 110. Axillary buds evident. 112 110. Axillary buds minute and not evident, or covered by the persistent petiole base. 111. 111. Bundle scar forming a curved line ; lateral buds sunken in the bark ; leaf scars after in threes. CEPHALANTHUS. 111. Bundle scars 3; terminal bud with 2 acuminate visible scales. CORNUS. 111. Bundle scars 3; terminal bud small, dome-shaped; axillary buds bursting through the prominent petiole base ; twigs many-angled PHILADELPHUS. 112. Twigs green or greenish, never twining. 113 112. Twigs gray, brown, or red, not green when ripe. 115. 113. Terminal bud self-pruned; stipular scars prominent; bark with strong odor. STAPHYLEA. 113. Terminal bud present. 114. 114. Leaf scars meeting and ending upward in a free appendage; base of petioles in some cases originally covering the axillary buds; bundle scars 3 or more. ACER. 114. Leaf scars not meeting; twigs more or less 4-angled; base of petiole not covering the axillary bud; bundle scar 1. EUONYMUS. 115. Twigs and buds brown-scurfy or stellate-pubescent; bundle scar 1; shrubs. LEPARGYREA. 115. Not brown-scurfy or stellate-pubescent. 116. 116. Bundle scars numerous in an ellipse or a ring ; trees with small flat buds or woody vines climbing by rootlets. 117. 116. Bundle scars 1, 3, or 5, or sometimes more but not in a ring. 118. 117. Trees with small flat iDuds; twigs gray, robust; pith large, white; leaf scars often in threes. CATALPA. 1 1 7. Woody vines climbing by rootlets ; ends of the twigs usuallv withering. TECOMA. 1 IS. Pith very large, the soft wood small in proportion; twigs either with cleavage planes in the upper leaf nodes or with brown papery outer bark separating readily from the green inner layer; shrubs with robust twigs. 119. 118. Pith small or if rather large then the plants trees. 120. 119. Lenticels conspicuous; tips of twigs self-pruned in the leaf nodes. SAMBUCUS. 1 1 9. Lenticels inconspicuous ; twigs not self-pruned ; outer papery brown bark easily separated from the inner dark green layer. HYDRANGEA. — 120 — 120. Bundle scars 1, or several closely united in a curved line appearing as 1. 121. 120. Bundle scars 3 or more, distinct. 125. 121. Low shrubs with decurrent ridges from the middle of the leaf scar. 122. 121. Trees or erect shrubs without decurrent ridges from the middle of the leaf scar but sometimes with ridges or wings from the ends of the leaf scar. 123. 28'6 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. V, No. 4, 122. Low creeping shrubs with deHcate erect or ascending twigs. ASCYRUM. 122. Low erect shrubs; leaf scar close to the bark; fruit a capsule. HYPERICUM. 122. Low erect shrubs; leaf scar on the prominent petiole base; fruit a berry. SYMPHORICARPOS. 123. Terminal bud absent, the twig usually ending in a thorn. RHAMNUS. 123. Terminal bud present; or if absent on some twigs then the end buds large, pointed, angular, and tisually green. 124. 124. Twigs and buds glabrovis; buds ovoid-pointed, 4-angled, scales fleshy; fruit a capsule. SYRINGA. 124. Twigs very pubescent, buds less so; lateral buds rather fiat, more or less triangular; bud scales fieshv; leaf scar on the short petiole base; fruit a drupe. LIGUSTRUM. 124. Twigs and buds pubescent ; lateral buds cylindrical or hemispherical ; bud scales dry; leaf scar concave, on the short petiole base; lenti- cels large and conspicuovis; fruit a drupe. CHIONANTHUS. 124. Buds rough or pubescent; twigs glabrous or pubescent, sometimes 4-angled; lateral buds somewhat flattened, obtuse; bud scales rather dry; leaf scar close to the bark; lenticels not large; fruit a samara. ' FRAXINUS. 125 "With a prominent pubescent ridge decurrent from the middle of the line connecting the leaf scars; low shrubs. DIERVILLA. 126. No pubescent decurrent ridge from the middle of the connecting line, but the ends of the leaf scars may be decurrent. 126. 126. Terminal bud with 2 long acuminate pubescent outer scales; line connecting the vippermost leaf scars notched. CORNUS. 126. Terminal bud with several pairs of visible scales, or with 1 large pair and a small pair at the base, or the tips of the twigs with- ering. 127. 127. Trees or shrubs with numerous bundle scars, sometimes in 3 areas, in a large heart-shaped leaf scar; pith rather large; terminal bud large, with numerous scales. ^SCULUS. 127. Bundle scars 3 or sometimes 5. 128. 128. Visible scales of the axillary buds 4 or more pairs, or if less, then the outer pair equalling the bud in length and the second pair hairy. 129. 128. Visible scales of the axillary buds 1-3 pairs, the outer short, or if equalling the bud then the second pair glabrous or glutinous. VIBURNUM. 12'.). Upper edge of the leaf scar strongly concave; usually large trees, if shrubs then the first pair of scales equaling the bud. ACER. 121). Upper edge of the leaf scar nearly straight; shrubs or climbing plants, the pith sometimes hollow, sometimes with hardened pith at the leaf nodes. LONICERA. Feb., 1905.] Nerthra stygica. 287 NERTHRA STYGICA SAY AND SOME NOTES ON THE FAMILY GELASTOCORID^. J. R. DE LA Torre Bueno. In 1832* in his ' 'Descriptions of Neiv Species of Hemiptera, Heteroptera of North America,'' Thomas Say described his "Naucoris stygica" from one mutilated specimen from Georgia. Its structure led him to propose a new genus for it, to be called Nerthra. From that time to the present the real "Nerthra stygica" has been lost to science. It is true that Monon3'x stygicus Say is mentioned by Uhler as well as by Comstock in some of their works, but from the description of it given by the first-named author in Kingsley's ''Standard Natural History" it is evident that the references are not to Say's bug, but either to Mononyx fuscipes Guerin or to M. nepasformis Fabricius. It is one of these two that Dr. Howard figures in his ''Insect Book." In support of this view is the fact that all the American works and papers which have been consulted fail to mention the most striking peculiarity of Nerthra; namely, the hemelytra soldered together and extremely roughened. The genus and species are cited in Stal's ''Enumeratio Hemipterorum," while on the other hand, Montandon, in his revision of the subfamily ' 'Monychinae" doubts its very existence, for he says that to his knowledge it has not again been found in America and, quoting Say's description in extenso, remarks it ' 'would lead one to believe that he (Say) had before him a form near to or identical with Matinus or Peltopterus and in any case differing from Mononyx." In the absence of Guerin's original generic characterization of Peltopterus, it has been referred to the description of the latter genus in Stal's ' 'Hemiptera Africana" (Vol. Ill, p. 173), to which genus Nerthra is nearest, on account of the entirely coriaceous character of the hemelytra. It differs, however, in the shape of the body, the apical tubercles of the head and the shape of the thorax and hemelytra. (This last may be a merely specific character.) It becomes, therefore, evident that Say's genus Nerthra stands, and since the very existence of the bug is ques- tioned by no less an authority than the Rumanian Hemipterist and so much misapprehension regarding it seems current I ven- ture to attempt a description from the onlv specimen I have seen, giving the bibliography and synonymy as far as known to me. Nerthra Say, 1831 (1832 sec. Uhler)— Description of N. Sp. of Het. Hem. of N. A., p. 808. 1859— Compl. Writ, of T. Say, ed. by Le Conte, Vol. I, p. 364. 1876— Stal, Enum. Hem., V., p. 139. * Prof. Uhler in a letter to Mr. G. W. Kirkaldy expresses the opinion that although Jbhis paper is dated 1831,|it'did not appear until March, 1832. 288 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. V, No. 4, Shape suboval, depressed; head short and broad; scutellum small; hemelytra entirely coriaceous and linearly roughened in prominent points, soldered together along a straight suture indi- cated by a groove. Rostrum small. Anterior femora basally incrassate; tarsal claws single. Abdomen rounded. Male gen- ital segments laterally deflected. N. stygica Say. (Fig. 1.) 1831— (1832?)— Naucoris stvgica Say. Descr. of N. Sp. Het. Hem. of N. A., p. SOS. 18.50— Conip. Writ, of T. Sav, ed. Le Conte, Vol. I, p. 364. 1876 — Nerthra stygica. Say, Stal. Eiuim. Hem. V, p. 139. 1890 — Montandon, Hem. Crypt. S. fam. Mononychinse, Bull. Soc. Scic., Bucarest, An. Vll, No. 4 and 5, p. 4 (separate). (Not — Mononv.x stvgictis Uhl., in Kingslev's Nat. Hist. p. 264, 1885; Uhl., Ch. List, p. 27. 1886; Uhl. Proc. Cal. Acad. Sci., 2d ser. IV, p. 200, 1S93"04; Comstock, Introduction, p. 191, 1888; Comstock, Manual, p. 134, 1809; Howard, Insect Bk., pi. XXIX, fig. 16.) Moderate in size, suboval, depressed; head short and broad with four tubercles in the middle, the outer two less elevated than the middle two; triangular in front and reflexed. Eyes reniform, not very prominent. Ocelli absent. Rostrum short, small and so hidden under the head as to be hardly visible (joints not counted for this reason). Prothorax, sides subparallel; cur- vedly converging in the cephalad third ; base slightly sinuate ; J.K.T.b Fig. 1. Nerthra stygica Say X5. Fig. 2. Nerthra stygica Say; feinur and tibia of first pair. X12. laterally flattened; apex nearly straight except at the eyes; disk much elevated and roughened. Scutellum triangular, sides sin- uated, much roughened. Hemelytra slightly flattened and dilated at the humeral angles and gently curvedly sloping to the rounded extremity ; entirelv coriaceous and linearly roughened in acute elevations along the lines of the sutures; soldered into one piece along a straight sulcate suture extending from the caudal angle of the scutellum to the tip of the hemelytra; appar- ently soldered to the scutellum as well; not entirely covering the abdomen, the connexival segments being moderately visible Feb., 1905.] Nerthra stygica. 289 beyond the costal margin ; extending beyond the end of the abdo- men. First pair of legs raptorial. Anterior femorae incrassate, flattened anteriorly and coming to a point (Fig. 2) ; coarsely granulate; tarsal claws single. Intermediate and posterior pedes cursorial ; femorae normal with a row of blunt teeth ; tibiae with two rows of stout spines with a sulcus between; tarsi one- jointed in intermediate pedes and provided with double claws (tarsi of posteriors lost in the specimen before me). Mesosternal tubercle rather acute and laterally somewhat flattened, ter- minated by bristles. Male abdominal segments much com- pressed in the middle to give room for the large and prominent genital segments which are deflected toward the right. Abdomen rounded with an entire margin. Color, blackish-brown above, except the flattened prothoracic and hemelytral lobes which are yellowish and translucent. Underside of the abdomen more or less black. First pair of legs entirely black; second and third more or less spotted with lighter color. Dimensions: Insect — Long., 7 A mm.; lat., 5.3 mm. Head including eyes — Long., .6 mm. ; lat., 3.4 mm. Prothorax — Long., 2.4 mm. ; lat., 5 mm. Abdomen — Long., 4.4 mm. ; lat., 5.3 mm. Redescribed from a single specimen in the collection of Mrs. Annie Trumbull Slosson who took it in Florida. The much roughened upper surface together with the entirely coriaceous hemelytra fused into one will at once distinguish this species from all the other Mononychinae. The preceding descriptions will doubtless be found lacking in manv respects but dissection being necessary to determine cer- tain anatomical features and characters, such, for instance, as the antennae, the possession of only one specimen, and that not my own, has made it impossible to supply what is missing. As Say's description is not accessible to all, I give it hereafter taking it from the Le Conte edition. "N. stvgica — Black, front quadrilineate. "Inhabits Georgia. "Bodv oval, brown-black, rather rough; head crenate on the front so as to form four denticulations ; eyes rounded, rather prominent; thorax not emarginate before, with a slightly de- pressed margin behind; anterior thighs dilated triangualr; hemelytra with oblique lines; they appear united at the suture. ' 'Length three-tenths of an inch. ' 'I have but one mutilated specimen which was sent to me by Mr. Oemler. If I am not deceived by this specimen, the species is apterous and the hemelytra are united by a rectilinear suture, which will require the formation of a separate genus which may be named Nerthra." 290 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. V, No. 4, My sincere thanks are due to Mrs. Slosson for her kindness in granting me the privilege of studying her insect. The revival of this genus raises the genera of North American Gelastocoridae (sens, lat.) to four, namely: Pelogonus Latreille, Gelastocoris Kirkaldy.=(7a/gn/H5 Latreille, Mononyx Laporte, Xcrthra Say. The number of species has heretofore been given for the United States as three only, Pelogonus americanus Uhl., Gelas- tocoris (Galgulus) oculatus Fabricius, and Monon^'x (Nerthra) stygica Say. As a matter of fact, however, their number cannot be fixed with certainty. The recorded species and those known to me are as follows, from the whole of North America. Family gelastocorid.« Kirkaldy. Subfamily Pclogonince. Genus Pelogonus Latreille. P. americanus LThler, Eastern U. S. P. pcrbosci Guerin-Mexico, W. Indies. P. crnifrons Champion-Mexico. P. viridijrons Champion-Guatemala. P. acutangulus Champion-Guatemala. Subfamily GelastocorincF. Genus Gelastocoris Kirkaldy. G. rotundatns Montandon-Mexico, Guatemala. G. bufo Herrich-Schteffer-Mexico, Guatemala, Costa Rica. G.' oculatus FalMncius-U. S., Canada, Mexico, Central and South America. G. vicinus Montandon-U. S., Mexico. G. variegatus Guerin-S. and W. U. S., Mexico, C. and S. A. Subfamily M ononychince . Genus Mononyx Laporte. M. fuscipes Guerin-W. U. S., Mexico, C. and S. A. M. ncpccjormis Fabricius. W. U. S. and Mexico. M . sp. n. sp. Florida. Genus Nerthra Say. A', stygica Say, S. E. U. S. This gives in all three subfamilies and fourteen species for North America. The preceding list of species is partly taken from Biologia Centrali Americana, partly from Montandon's revision before cited and some localities are from my collection. Guatemala bugs have been included because it is not at all improliable that they may cross the southern border of Mexico and even be found in the Southwestern United States. The Mononyx n. sp. men- tioned is an apparently undescribed bug from Florida, in the collection of Mr. Otto Hcidcmann, of Washington, D. C. Feb., 1905.] Hibernacula of Ohio Wafer Plants.. 291 For the species of Mononyx, tables will be found in Montan- don's paper; the Mexican and Central American forms of Pel- ogonus are tabulated in Vol. II, Rhvnchota of Biologia Centrali Americana, btit there is no work on Gelastorcoris outside of the notes under the sp3cies in the last mentioned work to help in separating them. New York Citv. THE HIBERNACULA OF OHIO WATER PLANTS. Harlan H. York. Many aquatic plants that root at the bottom of streams and lakes die down in the autumn and pass the winter by means of tubers, bulbs and rhizomes, while others have developed a peculiar type of winter propagative buds at the tips of the stems. These curious buds are found in many of the pond weeds, stone- worts and bladderworts. In the late summer and early autumn the plants turn brown and die except at the tips of the stems which remain alive. The tips of the stems cease to lengthen out and are enclosed with dark green leaves which become crowded and folded so closely as to form egg-shaped bodies. They remain on the stems for some time but finally become detached and sink to the bottom of the water where they escape the cold of winter and are scattered in various directions thus becoming a means for vegetative propagation. These buds are much shortened stems and are termed Hibernacula. A somewhat careful study was made of the hibernacula of Utricularia vulgaris since they are quite large and easily obtained. They begin to appear in the latter part of August and are formed in the manner already described, the leaves being crowded so closely and overlapping each other as to form green ball-shaped buds that are quite compact. The air spaces in the stems and leaves become much reduced and the cells are packed with starch granules which cause the buds to sink when they are detached from the stems. When the hibernacula first begin to develop, the tips of the stems and leaves secrete a mucilaginous substance, which surrounds and permeates the buds when they are formed. In the spring when the ice has melted and the sun's rays begin to warm the water, the buds commence to grow. The starch grains that were stored up in the preceding autumn are used in the building of the new stem. Bubbles of gas are set free which are held in the mucilaginous covering and cause the buds to rise to the surface of the water. The hibernacula have changed somewhat in appearance from that in the fall as they 292 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. V, No. 4, are more or less supplied with red coloring matter, probably a result of the low temperatures to which they have been exposed. The buds continue to expand and the enclosed stem becomes an active, growing plant. Later it may become attached in the mud by roots from the basal end. The bladders are mvich redviced, or almost entirely absent from the stems bearing the hibernacula, while they are found within the buds in an immature stage. The spaces between the leaves that go to form the hibernacula, contain various algae, such as Oscillatorias, Desmids, Diatoms and other unicellular forms. Fig. 1. Two hibernacula of Utricularia vulgaris on a single stem. Fig. 2. Longitudinal section through the middle of a hibernaculum of Utricularia vulgaris. Fig. .3. Longitudinal section of an immature bladder. The hibernacula of the Potamogetons, the Myriophylkxms and Philotria canadensis, are usually more elongated and the leaves less crowded than those of Utricularia. The buds do not rise to the surface of the water in the spring but remain in the mud and develop roots and leafy shoots which grow tipward toward the surface of the water. The Lemnas, Wolffias and Spirodela produce pocket shaped buds, which contain the next years' stem, and like those of Utricularia, usually sink to the bottom of the water on the approach of winter and in the spring rise again to the surface and develop into floating plants. Feb., 1905.] Key— Ohio Sumacs in Winter Condition. 293 The following named plants, found in Ohio, produce hiber- nacula : Lemna cj'clostasa (Ell.) Che v. Lemna minor L. Lemna triuslca L. Spirodela polyrhiza(L.) Schleid. Wolffia Columbiana Karst. Wolffia punctata Gris. Philotria canadensis (Mx.) Britt. Zannichellia palustris L. Potomageton pusillus L. Potomageton lonchitis Tuckcrm. Potomageton pusillus polyphyllus Morong. Potomageton zostera?folius Schum. Potomageton friesii Ruprecht. Potomageton vaseyi Robbins. Utricularia cornuta Mx. Utricularia gibba L. Utricularia intermedia Hayne. Utricularia vulgaris L. Myriophyllum heterophyllus Mx. Myriophyllum spicatum L. Myriophyllum tenellum Bigel. Myriophyllum verticillatvim L. KEY TO THE OHIO SUMACS IN THE WINTER CONDITION. Mabel Schaffxer. Rlius L. Small trees, shrubs, or woody vines climbing by rootlets, with a milky or acrid resinous sap ; pith more or less cylindrical, often large, white, brown, or yellowish; leaf scars alternate, not two-ranked; bundle scars several; stipular scars none; terminal bud present or absent; axillary buds single, not clustered at the tip of the twig, sometimes surrounded Ijy or hid- den under the leaf scar; bud scales several; sap of some species poisonous to most people when touched. 1. Leaf scar surrounding the axillary bud; pith very large, brown; erect shrubs or small trees. 2. 1. Leaf scar not completely surrounding the axillary bud; pith medium; erect shrubs, small trees, or woody vines climbing by rootlets. 3. 1. Leaf scar on the short petiole base which covers the axillary bud; pith small; bark glabrous, aromatic; low, ascending or diffuse shrub. R. aromatica Ait. Fragrant vSumac. 2. Twigs glabrous, somewhat glaucous. R. glabra L. Smooth Sumac. 2. Twigs velvety-hairy. R. liirta (L.) Sudw. Staghorn Sumac. 3. Bark velvety pubescent, brown; buds short, rounded; erect shrub or small tree. R. copallina L. Dwarf Sumac. 3. Bark glabrous or nearly so, or if pubescent then with aerial rootlets, gray or brownish-gray; buds projecting; bark and wood poisonous to most people when touched. 4. 4. Leaf scars heart-shaped; bundle scars numerous, scattered; erect shrub or small tree in swamps. R. vcrnix L., Poison Sumac. 4. Leaf scars LT-shaped; bundle scars numerous, scattered or arranged in a curve; woody vine climljing by aerial rootlets, sometimes shrubby or tree-like. R. radicaus L. Poison Ivy. 2 94 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. V, No. 4, MEETING OF THE BIOLOGICAL CLUB. Ortox Hall, Dec. 5, 1904. The club was called to order by the president, Mr. Sanders. The minutes of the previous meeting were read and corrected. The first business to come before the club was the report of the nominating committee as follows: for president, Prof. J. S. Hine; for vice president, Miss L. C. Riddle; for secretary-treasurer, F. M. Surface. On the motion of Prof. Schaffner the secretary was instructed to cast the unanimous ballot of the club for these officers. Prof. Hine being absent Miss Riddle took the chair. The major paper of the evening was by Mr. H. A. Gleason on the Sand Dunes of Central Illinois. In this region the vegetation is a coarse bunch grass prairie and scrub oak timber, but it is developing in the direction of typical Illinois woods and prairie. Prominent in the physiography are large excavations formed by the wind and known as blow outs. The flora presents little sim- ilarity with that of the nearby dunes along Lake Michigan, but shows a close relationship with the sand-hill region of Nebraska. In the discussion Prof. Schaffner spoke of the sand hills of Kansas and Nebraska. Prof. Hine now took the chair. Prof. Osborn spoke of the first day's meeting of the Ohio State Academy of Science at Cleveland. He spoke especially of Prof. Moseley's presidential address on the ''Formation of Sandusky Bay." Especially interesting was the account of the formation of Cedar Point. Other papers presented on the first day were Prof. Halsted's paper on '"Mathematics in Biology," Prof. Miller's lecture on ''Radium," and in the evening Prof. Herrick's "Bird Studies." Prof. Landacre then reported the second day's meeting of the Academy. The scientific papers were presented in the forenoon and the afternoon was taken for the business session. The mat- ter of a midwinter meeting wuth the Ohio Educational Societv was taken up and it was agreed that there should be at least a round table meeting at that time. Prof. Hine then reported on the financial condition of the Ohio Natur.vlist. The Naturalist is upon a firmer basis than ever before and its prospects for the future are bright. The following persons were elected to membership: J. F. Clevenger, C. H. Flory, L. H. Scholl, H. A. Gleason. The hour being late the president declared the club adjourned until the first Monday in January after the holiday vacation. F. M. Surface, Sec. Date of Publication of Februarv Number Feb. 24, 1905. c LU LIBR AR Y - I'he Ohio ^JSCatiiralist, PUBLISHED BY The Biological Club of the Ohio Slate Uni'versily. Volume V. MARCH. 1905. No. 5. TABLE OF CONTENTS Wacker— Ecological Notes ou Ohio Ptoridoph ytes 295 Flory— Key to tlie Ohio Mapks in the Winter Condition 297 ScHAFFNER— The Classification of Plants, 1 298 ScHAFFNER— Lycopodium porophilum in Ohio , r SOI Schaffner— The Struggle for Life on a Ceitain Saudl)ar ;!02 Riddle— Notes on the :\rorpht)li my ( )f Philotria o04 Tillman— Ohio Plants with Tendrils 30.3 ScHAFFNER— Key to Ohio Walnuts Based on Twig Characters S07 .Surface— iMeeting of the Biological Clul) 308 ECOLOGICAL NOTES ON OHIO PTERIDOPHYTES. Alma H. Wacker. Of the one hundred and nineteen Pteridophytes which Britten has hsted for the Northeastern United States and of the tw'O hundred and seventy-two recorded by Underwood for North America north of Mexico, at least sixty have been found in Ohio. This number inckides the ferns, horsetails, Lycopods, Selagnellas and Azolla. When looking for Pteridophytes it is well to remember that thev grow under widely diverse conditions; from exposed rocks and' sandv soil, meadows and rich woods to sw^amps and standing w-ater Besides the reproduction by spores other means of propaga- tion are present in most species. Rhizone propagation is one of the most commion means. The rhizomes or underground stems may be upright as in Ophioglossum, or horizontal as in most of the ordinarv ferns. They may be smooth or scaly, branched or unl )ranched ; or they may be found creeping upon the ground and sending roots into the earth as in some of the Lycopods. In some species vegetative propagation by special gemmse or brood-buds is present as in Filix bulbifera, wdiile in Lycopodium hicidulum there are peculiar modified buds. These drop to the ground and give rise to new^ plants. A few ferns have leaf propagation; the tip of the leaf takes root and develops a new plant. This occurs in Camptosorus rhizophvllus, Asplenium pinnatifidum, A. platy neuron, and X. ebenoides. There is another kind of propagation which may be 296 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. V, No. 5, mentioned here. Nephrolepis exaltata, a cultivated species, sends out runners, which often take root at the end and thus form a new plant. Onlv two of our Pteridophytes are annuals, Selaginella apus and Azolla caroliniana. The rest are perennial; of these a large number are evergreen, the aerial portion persisting and remaining green throughout the winter. The following list includes the Pteridophytes which belong to the evergreen class: Polypodiuni vulgare. polypodioides. Pellcea atropurpurea. Asplenivim pinnatifidum. " ebenoides. " platyneuron. " trichonianes. " ruta-muraria. montanum. Caniptosorus rhizophyllus. Polysticlium acrostichoides. Dryopteris cristata. " " clintoniana. marginalis. spinulosa. Classifying the Ohio Pteridophytes according to habitat, we have the following list: 1. Those growing in wet marshes or swamps with or without abundant shade. Botrychium matricaria'folium. Woodwardia virginica. lanceolatum. Dryopetris noveboracensis. Osmunda cinnamomea. " cristata. regalis. " spinulosa intermedia. clavtoniana. " " dilatata. Dryopteris spinulosa intermedia dilatata. Woodsia obtusa. Equisetum robustum. hyemale. " kevigatum. " variegatum. scirpoides. Lycopodium lucidulum. inundatum. " obscurum. " annotnium. " clavatum. pomplaiiatum. Selag'nella rupestris. 2. Those growing on the more or less moist: Ophioglossum vulgatum. Botrychium matricaritefolium. lanceolatum. Adiantum pedatum. Asplenium platyneuron. Athyrium thelypteris. filix-firmina. Dryopteris noveboracensis. goldieana. marginalis. " spinulosa. ground in rich woods and thickets Phegopteris phegopteris. hexagonoptera. " dryopteris. Filix fragilis. Woodsia obtusa. Equisetum scirpoides. Lycopodium luciduluin. obscurum. " annotinum. " clavatum. " complanatum. 3. Those growing in moist rocky ravines or rocky places are: Botrvt'liium virginianum. Dryopteris marginalis. - ■ AVoodsia ()l)tusa. As])lenium angvistifolium. Filix ])ulbifera. Phegojiteris i)liego])leris. ■■ fragilis. " dryopteris. March, 1905.] Key, Ohio Maples in Winter Condition. 297 4. Those found on rocks either hmestone or sandstone are: Polypodium vulgare. Asplenium niontanum. polypodioides. " parvuluni. Pelkea atropurpurea. Camptosorus rhizophyllus. Asplenium pinnatifidum. Filix bulbifera. ebenoides. Woodsia ilvensis. ■ " trichomanes. Selaginella rupestris. " ruta-muraria. 5. A very few may be found growing in sandy soil. Among these we find: Equisetum arvense. Equisetvim sylvaticum. pratense. 6. The following are found growing under varying conditions in manv localities: Botrychium obliquum. Dennstsedtia punctilobula. dissectum. • Dryopteris thelypteris. " lunaria. Polystichum acrostichoides. " virginianum. Asplenium angustifolium. Onoclea sensibilis. Pteridiuin aquilinum. Matteucia struthiopteris. 7. In addition to what has been mentioned above, Osmunda regalis is occasionally found in standing water, and Azolla caroliniana floating on still water. KEY TO THE OHIO MAPLES IN THE WINTER CONDITION. Charles H. Flory. Acer, L. Trees or shrubs with fibrous roots; twigs slender or sometimes robust, usually glabrous, green, gray, brown or red, with or without lenticular corky ridges ; lenticels sometimes prominent ; pith solid, rather small; leaf scars opposite, contiguous or con- nected by a ridge, sometimes meeting in a free point, either U or V shaped ; stipular scars none ; bundle scars 3-5 ; buds short- stalked or sessile; terminal bud present; lateral buds prominent, often three side by side; scales either dry or fleshy, glabrous or pubescent, brown, gray, green or red; bark close or exfoliating, gray, brown or black; wood light colored, usually hard, heavy, strong, stiff and tough, of fine texture or frequently wavy grained; fruit a 2-winged, 2- seeded samara. 1. Twigs green or purplish green, glaucous; axillary buds originally cov- ered by the petioles; buds hairy, not stalked; leaf scars meeting in a free point. Acer negundo L Boxelder. 1. Twigs green, brownish, or reddish, with narrow, white, longitudinal lines; buds large, glabrous, stalked; a shrub or small tree. Acer peiinsylvanicmn L. Striped Maple. 1. Axillary buds not covered by the petiole base; twigs not striped. 2. 2. Older twigs with prominent, longitudinal, corky ridges; cultivated, from Europe. Acer campestrc L. English Maple. 2. Twigs without corky ridges. 3. 298 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. V, No. 5, 3. Terminal buds large, angular, more or less pointed, glabrous except at the margins of the scales; bud scales very fleshy; twigs robust; not red. 4. 3. Terminal buds rather small, pointed or obtuse, pubescent, not very angular; scales dry or if rather fleshy then the twigs red or reddish; twigs usvially slender. 5. 4. Twigs slender, brownish or grayish, not glaucous; leaf scars meeting in a free point; buds large, fleshy, slightly greenish to dark red; outer surface of 4-6 inner scales chestnut brown; cultivated. Acer platanoidcs L. Norway Maple. 4. Twigs stout, greenish brown to gray, glavicous; leaf scars usually not contiguous; buds large, fleshy, green or slightly tinged with red; outer surface of inner scales not chestnut brown; twigs with self- prvming scars; cultivated. Acer pseudo-plataniis L. Sycamore I\Iaple. 5. Twigs closely gray pubescent; buds small, evidently stalked; shrubs or rarely small trees. Acer spicatuni Lam. Mountain Maple. 5. Twigs glabrous; buds short-stalked or sessile; large trees. 6. 0. Buds rounded, robust, fleshy, reddish in color; visible scales 2-S; leaf scars rarely contiguous; twigs with self-pruning scars. 7. G. Buds slender, pointed, dry, brownish to brownish gray, sometimes nearly black at tip; visible scales 6-16; leaf scars contiguous or nearly so; twigs without self-pruning scars. 8 7. Twigs glabrous, brownish to red; bark gray, falling away in large, thin flakes on old trees. Acer sacchariiiuin L. Silver Maple. 7. Twigs glabrous, reddish to red ; bark light gray, rough on old trees, but not falling away in large pieces. Acer rubrtim L. Red Maple. 8. Twigs reddish brown or buff, mostly glossy; buds conical, acute, gray, pubescent ; limb of leaf scars less prominent because of the absence of stipules; ridge connecting leaf scars only slightly pubescent; bark of trunk dark gray or gray, soinewhat spreading. Acer saccharum Marsh. Sugar IMaple. 8. Twigs greenish to gray bviff, dull; bvids ovoid, conical, often obtuse; limb of leaf scars inore proininent because of the presence of stipules; ridge connecting leaf scars prominently pubescent; lenticels prominent and usually many; Ijark of trunk black, rather close. Acer )u'gnijii Michx. Black Maple. THE CLASSIFICATION OF PLANTS, I. John H. Schaffner. It is the intention of the writer to give from time to time, for the use of students, a series of notes on the classification of plants. The disposition made of the plant kingdom will represent the writer's own views although much has been borrowed from various sources. The classification of the plant kingdom should be an expres- sion of its evolutionary history so far as known or it should at least be an attempt at such an expression. It should be based on the doctrine of descent. A natural arrangement should take account of the progressive advancement of ]jlants from the lowest to the highest types as well as of the segregation of great branches or groups and the origin of large numbers of species belonging to the same general level. In other words, the scheme should March, 1905.] The ClassificaHon of Plants, I. 299 include the recognition of both vertical and horizontal develop- ments. In a general way the morphological characters which represent the progress from unicellular to the most complex mul- ticellular forms are of very great importance in placing any group of organisms in the scale. But of still greater importance is the character of the life cycle. If all tvpes of plants evolved m the past had remained to the present dav, it would be possible to devise a scheme which would show the natural relationships of all species and larger groups by verv close connecting links. But in the evolutionary process plants passed through critical stages where it was hardly possible for them to tarrv. The species must either remain below the critical condition or else advance farther in order to meet the requirements of the newly acquired structures, habits, or func- tions. The changing conditions of the earth's surface have had a profound effect as well as the mere fact of a great diversity of conditions. One of the most important factors in the problem of classification arises out of the changing environments to which plants were subjected during the geological history of the earth. In finding a basis for the determination of evolutionary advance- ment or retrogression, therefore, the ecological factor also be- comes one of great importance. The change of functions and activities in passing from one set of conditions to another is some- times considerable. As one would expect, then, there are breaks in the continuitv of plant groups and these breaks frequently mark the transition to life in a dift'erent environment. There are two very important gaps which divide the entire plant kingdom, as we have it at present, into three distinct groups. Each succeeding group is in all essentials more highly developed than the preceding and shows no very close relation- ship to it, the intermediate forms having been lost. These three groups may be called series and we can then say that the plant kingdom is divided into three series. The first great hiatus occurs at the point where plants adapted to a water habitat passed out to aerial conditions. It represents the grand transition from water to aerial moist ground plants. This transition must, however, not be confused with those cases where plants having a body adapted to a water condition, typ- icallv filamentous in form, merely changed sufficiently to endure an aerial habitat. The second great hiatus marks the boundary line between those plants, on the one hand, which are still dependent on con- siderable moisture for one generation and on the presence of free water to accomplish fertilization and the plants, on the other hand, which have been practically weaned from the necessity of free water during any period of their life cycle. In these highest 300 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. V, No. 5, dryland plants the water taken from the soil into the bodv of the plant is sufficient for carrying on all the essential processes of life. From certain morphological characteristics the three great groups or series have been called Thallopiiyta, Archegoniata, and Spermatophyta, or in English, Thallophytes, Archegoniates, and Spermatophytes or Seed Plants. It must not be supposed, however, that all plants live in the habitat to which thev seem to have been adapted originally. The great inajorit}' of Thallo- phytes now live in the air, many Archegoniates are found in verv dry places, while great numbers of Seed Plants have returned to the water. The general progress of the history of the earth's surface has been from an aqueous condition to a dry land condition. Plants originated in the water and since islands and continents arose from the primordial ocean they have been stranded on the shores and crowded from water to aerial conditions bv the clrving of swamps and seas. When drier conditions began to prevail on the enlarging islands and continents, the lack of free water was met by the development of seeds. The progressive advance- ment of the general mass of the plant kingdom has plainlv been along the lines of the earth's physiographic history. It must not be concluded however, that the evolution of plants was entirely or even to a considerable extent due to environment but only that the evolutionary process has kept pace with physiographic changes on the earth. The evolutionary processes are primarilv the result of protoplasmic properties and functions. Organisms in the past were as well adapted to live in their environment as organisms are at present ; and from a geological point of view it becomes evident that evolution has been making its wav through the conditions of environment from the beginning. Generalized or archaic types are usually as rare in fossil groups as among liv- ing forms. As for example in various groups of gymnos])erms, the first known forms are as highly specialized as an)- which come later. It is probably safe to say that the conditions of environment may and do act as determinative factors in the evoltxtionary process but they are not the cause of the process. The three series of plants may be characterized as folloAvs: A. TiiALLOPHYTA. Thallophvtes. GO,()()t) known living species. The lowest plants; typically water plants but the majority now with- out chlorophyll and living as parasites or saprophytes in aerial conditions; plant body a thallus, unicellular, coenobioid, or multicellular, usually tila- mentous, very minute to gigantic in size; all gradations from the lowest nonsexual plants to plants with complete se.xuality and often with an alternation of generations but the sporophyte or nonsexual generation always small and not typically deveU)pcd, the gametophyte l)cing the plant; oospherc when present never produced in an archegonium but in a simple oogonium. March, 1S05.] Lycopodium porophilum in Ohio. 301 B. Archegoniata. Archegoniatcs. 15,000 known living species. The intermediate plants; normally aerial plants but moisture-loving; always with an alternation of generations, the gametophyte compara- tively large and often hermaphrodite in the lower forms but minute and always unisexual in the highest; the sporophyte small and without vas- cular tissue and permanently parasitic in the lower forms but large and witli vascular tissue and becoming independent when mature in the higher; either homosporous or hetei-osporous, eusporangiate or leptospo- rangiate, never seed-producing; growing point commonly with a definite, two- or three-sided apical cell; stems sometimes having secondary thick- ening bv means of a more or less perfect cambium or by division in the cortical' cells; oosphere produced in an ovary of definite character called an archegonium and always cutting off a ventral canal cell; fertilization asiphonogamic, the spermatozoids swimming through water. C. Spermatophyta. Seed Plants. 125,000 known living species. The highest plants; normally dry land plants; always with an alter- nation of generations; sporophyte large, heterosporous and eusporangiate, the spores not discharged; the gametophytes usually minute, developing in the sporangia and thus parasitic on the sporophyte; female gameto- phyte, with an archegonium which develops an oosphere and ventral canal cell or with only a rudimentary ovary, retained permanenth^ in the megasporangium (ovule) ; male gametophytes (pollengrains) at length discharged from the microsporangivmi (pollensac) but having a second period of parasitic growth by the formation of a pollentube, hence fertili- zation always siphonogamic ; male cells usually nonciliated but in the lowest classes developing into multiciliate, motile spermatozoids; plants producing seeds, the sporophyte embryo passing into a resting stage inter- vening between its intra- and extra-seminal development; stems without true apical cells, but more commonly with a cambium zone from which secondary thickening takes place. LYCOPODIUM POROPHILUM IN OHIO. John H, Schaffxer. The Rock Lycopod, Lycopodium porophiluui Lloyd and Underw., is a plant holding an intermediate position between L. selago L. and L. lucidulum Mx. In examining some of my herba- rium material recently I recognized a fine specimen of this species, which Mr. O. E. Jennings had collected for me for class use over a vear ago. The collection was made near Lancaster, Fairfield Co. It probably has a considerable range in the state and should be looked for wherever sandstone cliffs abound. It has a rather stiff appearance and can be easily recognized form the descrip- tion as given in Britton's Manual. The prostrate portion of the stem is short and has abundant roots. After several dicho- tomous branchings the vertical stems form a rather dense tuft 6 — 12 cm. high. The plant has abundant brood buds. The leaves are nearly linear, acitminate, and nearly entire. They are considerably smaller than those of L. hicidiiluiii and differ froi L. selago in having the bases flattened. UJ L I B R A R Y 302 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. V, No. 5, THE STRUGGLE FOR LIFE ON A CERTAIN SANDBAR. JOHX H. SCHAFFXER. In the year 1900, the RepubHcan River which flows through Clay County, Kansas, was very low for a long tiine. This gave an opportunity for the development of a thick growth of vege- tation on the wide sandbars common along this stream. The writer was much impressed by the remarkable develop- ment of young trees on some of these bars and made a careful study of one of them to ascertain what seedlings were growing under the conditions present. The picture given below (Fig. 1) i!L:i-. was taken from near the water's edge and shows the river bank in the background, covered with a solid belt of the Sandbar Wil- low (Salix fluviatilis Nutt.) This bar had been nearly barren the previous year but now it was covered with little trees. The only seedlings present, except here and there some herbaceous plant, were Cottonwoods (Populus deltoides Marsh.), Peachleaf Willows (Salix amygdaloides And.), and Sandbar Willows (Salix fluviatilis Nutt.) In some places the three species were about equally mixed, in others nearly all of the plantlets were of a single species. Near the outer margin where there was a thinner stand, as shown in the foreground of the picture, eighty Cottonwood plants from twelve to eighteen inches high were counted per square foot. But among these eighty survivors were numerous March, 1905.] Struggle for Life on a Sandbar. 3°3 smaller dead and decaying individuals. Going a little farther toward the centre of the field, two hundred plants (Cottonwoods, Peachleaf Willows, and Sandbar Willows) were counted on an accurately measvired square foot! Many, however, were losing in the struggle for space and light and were either sickly in appearance or in a dying condition. A few were already dead. The smaller ones were hopelessly shaded. A great destruction was taking place among these immature or juvenile individuals long before the normal conditions of adult life were possible. All had apparently sprouted at about the same time and the struggle for existence was among more or less similar individuals of a very few species. These possessed the ground so completely that there was practically no opportunity for an intruder to gain a foothold at this stage of the process. But suppose that this society were to continue its develop- ment for a number of years or until the trees had grown to maturity. In three years there would be abotit one tree for each square foot. Such examples are numerous on old sandbars. Of the two hundred plants one hundred and ninety-nine would have no room and must inevitably perish. But in this way space is again made available for other plants to sprout among the sur- vivors. Thus the original struggle among those of like nature makes an opportunity for plants of other species to invade the territory. Some of these can endure the shade and other imposed conditions already present and the result is more and more of a mixed society. The struggle for life is now between diverse species under all gradations of favorable and unfavorable conditions. The struggle among the original possessors of the soil is, however, not yet at an end. As the trees grow larger more and more must give way to their more powerful or fortunate neighbors. In twenty-five years there would be at most but one large Cottonwood or Willow for each fiftv square feet. Nine thousand nine hundred and ninetv-nine little Cottonwoods and Willows will have been over-reached and over-shadowed and the one solitary giant will stand as the sole survivor of a conquered multitude. Not a single plant of this particular society, however, was thus fortunate. For two years later a high flood washed over the entire bar and removed everv vestige of the thriving young plant society. Accidental destruction put an end to the process of the elimination of the unfit. At present the struggle for existence is again going on as vigorouslv among the members of a new society as it did among those which had occupied the soil before ; and it is evident that without the destruction of the pre- vious society the later generation would not even have had an opportunity to try the experiment of the juvenile stage. 304 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. V, No. 5, NOTES ON THE MORPHOLOGY OF PHILOTRIA. LuMiXA C. Riddle. The studv of Philotria canadensis', was begun bv the writer in July, 1902, with the expectation of making a careful investiga- tion of its morphological characters. On account of difficulty in obtaining a complete series the work was delayed and in the meantime a preliminary report on the same subject was presented at the St. Louis meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science by R. B. Wylie and later the paper was printed in full, Bot. Gaz. 37: 1-22. So carefully has he worked out nearly every detail that there seems little to add to the subject except in the way of verifica- tion. Yet it is thought advisable to make a note of some of the most important points. Material for study was collected from Sandusky Bay, Lake Erie where the plant grows more or less abundantly but blooms rather uncertainly. None of the material obtained gave satis- factory stages beyond fertilization. The staminate flowers were found on the opposite side of the Bay from the carpellate colony. The staminate flowers were uniformly of nine extrorse bi- sporangiate stamens, the three center ones being more or less united by the filaments and in some cases these extended above so as to form a resemblance to a stigma. Staminodia were found also in the carpellate flowers, but these showed no traces of sporangia. Measurements of flowers which gave the archesporial cell stage were about 4 mm. long. Opened flowers varied in length according to the distance of the stem at their origin from the sur- face of the water. The average length was about 100 mm. or 4 inches. The single archesporial cell cuts oft' one parietal cell usually. The primary sporogenous cell is always much the larger and divides into four megaspores the lowest being the functional one. The upper one was often quite long and was usually the last to succumVj to the rapidly enlarging embryo sac. The widening of the embr\'o sac was great in onlv one plane and was not very marked when sections were cut at right angles to that plane. The pouch-like form of the antipodal region was very noticeable. Miss Burr found a similar pouch in \'allisneria, Ohio Nat. 4: 439- 443. In everv case three pale vcscicular nuclei could be found deep in the pouch. In some cases a large brightly stained nucleus was found just above the antipodals but careful examination showed that it was either the lower polar nucleus in a typical eight celled embryo sac or else the evidence was that there had been a division of the definitive nucleus and one of the first March, 1905.] Ohio Plants uith Tendrils. 3°5 daughter nuclei had travelled to the antipodal region just as Schaffner finds to be the case in Sagittaria, Bot. Gaz. 23: 252- 272, and Miss Burr in Vallisneria. In the case of Philotria how- ever, no definite wall was found cutting this nucleus off from the rest of the embryo sac. While Wylie seems to indicate in PI. 11. figs. 35-36 that there is fusion of the second sperm nucleus with the definitive nucleus it seems difficult to account for the extra nucleus in the antipodal region unless there had already been a division of the defiinitve nucleus or the polar nuclei had failed to conjugate, for in the slides which the writer examined the polar nuclei were in close contact long before fertilization and the antipodals were too vescicular to indicate the possibility of any further activity. The synergidcc stained quite characteristically so that they were easily distinguished from the other nuclei in the embryo sac. The pollen grains showed distinctly the tube nucleus and the crescentic sperm nuclei connected bv a slender filament of cyto- plasm while the four members of the tetrad still remained in close contact. OHIO PLANTS WITH TENDRILS. Opal I. Tillmax. Tendril plants are for the greater part, plants of the tropics, where the vegetation is so dense that the plants have developed such organs bv means of which thev are brought to a more favor- able position with respect to light. The tendrils attach them- selves to supports and thus bring the plant to an upright position or aid it in climbing over various objects. In the different species the tendrils morphologically represent different parts of the plant and this furnishes a basis of classification. Some tendrils attach themselves by twining entirely around the support, others as the Virginia Creeper, attach themselves by means of little discs with adhesive surfaces developed at the tips of the tendril. The tendril usually grows straight until the tip touches some object of support around which it hooks to sectire a firm hold, then it shortens usually by coiling in a double spiral. All tendril plants may be divided into two main divisions: first the leaf climbers, and second the shoot or branch climbers. Each of these main divisions may be subdivided depending upon the degree of development. In the leaf tendrils the entire leaf, terminal leaflet, petiole, or petiolule or other parts may be modified into the tendril. There are five families in Ohio which have plants belonging to this group with twenty-three species. In the Smilace.-e the two tendrils are located on either side of the base of the petiole, which presists, the blade being cast oft' 3o6 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. V, No. 5, bevond the tendril. They are simple and coil in the usual man- ner. In case of Smilax bona-nox there is a decided widening at the base of the tendril; S. ecirrhata is usually without tendrils. The following greenbriers occur in Ohio: 1. Smilax herbacea L. .3. Smilax hispicia Muhl. 2. " ecirrhata (Engelm) Wats. 6. " pseudo-China L. 3. " glauca Walt. 7. " bona-nox L. 4. " rotundifolia L. In our Raxun'CULace.-e the leaves are the climbing organs, the petiole or petiolule is the sensitive part. In Clematis virgin- iana there are cases showing the transition from leaf to tendril. The leaflets drop off and leave the petiole presistent. There are two species in Ohio: 8. Clematis virginiana L. 9. Clennatis viorna L. One of the Papaverace.^ has modified leaves which act as tendrils. The petiolule is the sensitive part. The leaflets are very much reduced often .showing a transition from ordinary leaf parts to tendril. Our species is: 10. Adlumia fungosa (Ait) Greene. The Fabace.^ which have tendrils belong to the pea tribe, Vicieae. The ends of the leaves develop into tendrils which have from two to five branches, except Lathyrus ochroleucus in which the tendril is simple. The Ohio species are: 11. Vicia cracca L. 17. Vicia angustifolia Roth. 12. " amerlcana Muhl. 18. Lathyrus maritimus (L.) Bigel. 13. " Carolina Walt. 19. " venosus Muhl. 14. " tetrasperma (L.) Mtjench. 20. " palustris L. 1.5. " hirsuta (L.) Koch. 21. " myrtifolius Muhl. 10. " sativa (L.) 22. " ochroleucus Hook. In our species belonging to the Bigngniace.^ there are two leaflets and one branched tendril coming from the end of the presistent petiole. 23. Bignonia crucigei-a L. The twig or shoot tendrils may represent ordinary branches or modified parts of a flower cluster and as in the leaf tendrils they may be either simple or branched. In Ohio are found four families with seventeen species belonging to this division or group. In the climbing Sapixdace.-e two tendrils occur at the base of the flower cluster. Our onlv species is the introduced: 24. Cardiospermum halicacabum L. In the ViTACE.^ the tendrils appear on the twig opposite the leaf. They are usuallv branched several times. In some cases one of the branches of the tendril develops a rudimentary bunch of grapes, or there may be a well developed l)unch of grapes with a rudimentary tendril. In Ampelopsis cordata and most other species of this family every third leaf node is without a tendril. The Ohio s])ecies are: March, 1905,] Key to Ohio Walnuts. 3°7 25. Vitis labrusca L. 29. Vitis cordifolia Michx. 26. " aestivalis Michx. 30. Ampelopsis cordata Michx. 27. "* bicolor Le Conte. 31. Parthenocissus quinquefolia 28. " vulpina L. (L.) Planch. In our species belonging to the Passiflorace,^ there is a single unbranched tendril coming from the axil of the leaf. It coils in the usual manner. 32. Passiflora lutea L. The tendrils in the Cucurbitace.« represent modified shoots; part of the tendril being stem and part leaf. They are from two to five branched, all the branches coming from the same point. Thev usually appear beside the leaf. The Ohio species are: 33. M'crampelis lobata (Michx) 37. Cucurbita maxima L. Greene. 38. Citrulkis citrullns (L.) Karst. 34. Sicyos angulatus L. 39. Cticumis melo L. 35. Cucurbita pepo L. 40. " sativus L. 36. '■ pepo ovifera L. KEY TO OHIO WALNUTS BASED ON TWIG CHARACTERS. JOHX H. SCHAFFXER. Juglaiis L. Trees with valuable often very dark-colored wood, spreading branches, and fragrant bark; twigs with terminal buds and superposed axillary buds and with dark brown bark; leaf scars alternate, large, heart-shaped, not 2-ranked; btmdle scars 3 or in 3 areas ; stipular scars none ; end of twig often show- ing a self-pruning scar caused by the falling away of the car- pellate peduncle; pith diaphragmed, with cavities. 1. Bark of twigs very pubescent. 2. 1. Bark of twigs glabrous; terminal bud and most of the lateral buds hemispheric or very short-pointed, but some may be cone-shaped; cultivated. /. regia L. English Walnut 2. Axil of leaf scar with a hairy cushion below the buds; terminal bud light-colored, usually truncate, with long scales; lateral buds usvially spher.'cal. /. cincrca L. Butternut 2. Axil of leaf scar without a hairy cushion; terminal bud dark-colcred, usually pointed, with short scales; lateral buds ovoid-conic. /. nigra L. Black Walnut The Nature Study Review, published in New York under the editorship of Prof. M. E. Bigelow of Columbia and with a very distinguished list of associates is undertaking to develop the nature study movement along lines which will doubtless command the support of the better class of naturalists. There has been of late years so much of a tendency to run the nature study idea into such extremely popular and superficial lines that the real purpose and intent of the originators has been endangered. That there is abundant place for every agency that will tend to extend the knowledge of nature while at the ^&^ 3oS The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. V, No. 5, same time avoiding the running of nature study into a mere fad of nature romance, will doubtless be agreed by all true naturalists. Readers of the Naturalist will find much of interest in the numbers of the Review so far published and doubtless future numbers will be of equal interest and value. H. O. MEETING OF THE BIOLOGICAL CLUB. Orton Hall, Jan. 9, 1905 The meeting was called to order by the Vice-President, Miss Riddle. The minutes of the previous meeting were read and approved. The first speaker of the evening was Prof. W. C. Mills, whose subject was ' 'The Ainu of Japan." Prof. Mills came into personal contact with the Ainu at the St. Louis Exposition, and was able to illustrate his talk with several photographs and with specimens of their handiwork. The Ainu are one of the primitive peoples of Japan and at present inhabit the northern islands, principally Yezo. At present there are about 17,000 Ainu and about 9()0,000 Japanese on this island. The nine Ainu who were brought to Sf. Louis were the first to leave their native land in 1400 years. The men all wear long l)eards and the women tattoo their faces to represent a beard. This tattooing is begun at abovit the age of nine and is done by cutthig the flesh and rubbing in the wounds soot from the bottom of their cooking vessels. The average height of the men is about 5 ft. 4 in. Their eves are horizontal ; the skin is white, and their features resemble those of many of the white races of Europe. The women weave a kind of cloth called Artus, made from the fibers of the Elm and from this they make much of their clothing. This clothing is usually decorated with certain entirely original, spiral patterns. Their religious customs are very peculiar. The bear plays an important part in their religion and the bear hunt and feast is one of their singular customs. Prof. Osborn then gave an account of the recent meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science and of some of its affiliated societies. Prof. Lazenby also spoke of some of the afiiliated societies, especially the Society of Agriculturists and the Society of Horticulturists. Prof. Landacre gave a short account of the meeting of the Ohio Educational Society and the mid-winter meeting of the Ohio Academy. On the motion of Prof. Schaftner the following were elected to membership: .E. C. Cotton, G. F. Lamb, J. P. Pratt and T. P. White. The club then adjourned until the first Monday in February. F. M. Surface, Secretary. Date of Publication of March Number, March 23, 1905. The Ohio ^JSCaturali PUBLISHED BY The Biological Club of the Ohio State University, Volume V. APRIL, 1905. No. 6. TABLE OF CONTENTS Williamson— Oilonata, Astacidae and Unionidae Colleet^^d Along the Rockeastk' River at Livingston, Iveiitiicky 309 Claassen— Key to the Liverworts Recognized in tlie Sixtli Edition of Gray's Manual of Botany 312 Smith— Key to the Ohio Elms in the Winter Condition 315 Gleason— Notes from the Ohio State Herbarium. Ill 316 Riddle— Development of the Embryo Sac and Emliryo of Stapliylea trifoliata 320 YoKK— A New Aspidiotus from Aesculus glaijra 325 Landacre — The Rate of Growth in Epistylis flavicans 327 Surface— Meeting of the Biological Clul) 329 ODONATA, ASTACIDAE AND UNIONIDAE COLLECTED ALONG THE ROCKCASTLE RIVER AT LIVINGSTON, KENTUCKY. E. B. Williamson. The few following records of two days collecting in Rock- castle County, Kentucky, near the headwaters of the Cumberland River on June 23 and 24, 1904, may be of interest. Since col- lecting along the Cumberland at Nashville, Tennessee, I have been desirous of following the same river among the hills of eastern Kentucky where I expected to find the Rockcastle a rapid mountain stream with waterfalls, deep pools and long, swift rapids. Such is far from its nature. Its bed in the soft rocks is nearly made and, resting from former labors, the stream flows so slowdy under the overhanging branches of birch trees that its motion is almost imperceptible. Shaded bv trees and hills, steep-banked, cold and motionless, it offers few of those attractions to dragonflies which I had hoped ot find. There are no gorges and only an occasional low, short ripple (locally shoal) relieves the monotony of long stretches of canal like tranquilitv. The perfume of flowering laurels on the verdure-clothed banks saturate an atmosphere in which sound and motion would be as sacrilegious as in the chamber of death. Doubtless at seasons there is greater activity. On the dates above mentioned (June 23 and 24) only nine species of dragonflies were taken. I believe collecting three weeks earlier would have revealed a greater number of species and individuals, and possibly a great many Gomphines might have been found at the ripples at this time. 3IO The Ohio Naturalist. [Vo]. V, No. 6, DRAGONFLIES. 1. Calopteryx angustipennis. Not rare, frequenting willow- herb at ripples. This species was taken by Mr. Chas. Dury along Little Blue River, Crawford County, Indiana, May 27, 1904. This lost species, rediscovered in L899 in Pennsylvania and Ohio, seems to have unaccountably escaped collectors for a long period. 2. Argia tibialis. This species was found abundantly along Sycamore Creek, a tributary of the Cumberland, near Nashville, Tenn., during the spring of 19(U. 3. Enallagma exsulaiis. This is the river Enallagma of the Ohio River system. 4. Progomphus obscurus. This common gomphine was not rare along the Rockcastle. 5. DroHiogoitiphus spinosus. What has been said of Progom- phus obscurus applies to this species. 6. Gomphus dilatatus. Two males, resting on boulders in mid- stream in a ripple, were taken. 7. Lanthus albistylus. Observed in the afternoon resting on boulders and pebbles about a wide slow ripple. The nymph, described by Hagen from Kentucky as possibly Tachopteryx thoreyi and referred by Needham to Lanthus parvulus, in all probability is this species. 8. Hagenius brevistylus. Recently emerged individuals of both sexes were taken. 9. Macronu'a illinoiensis. Several males taken flying along the river. CRAYFISHES FROM KENTUCKY. Notes and determinations by Dr. A. E. Ortmann. 1. Cambarus bartoni (F.) 3 males (second form), 1 female. Rostrum more tapering and narrower than in typical specimens from eastern Pennsylvania; but a similar form of rostrum is found in (chiefly young) individuals from western Pennsylvania. Tubercles of inner margin of hand more strongly developed, with slight indications of a second row. Small streams tribuatry to Rockcastle River, Livingston, Rock Castle Co., Ky. E. B. Williamson. 2. Cambarus extraneus Hag. 2 males (second form), 2 females. Hagen, 111. Cat. Mus. Harvard. 3. 1870 p. 73. Faxon, Mem. Mus. Harvard. 10. 1885 p. 84. Faxon, Pr. U. S. Mus. 20. 1898 p. 050. Areola slightly longer than half of anterior section of cara- pace; fingers of chelae elongated (characters of girardianus). Lateral spine of carapace well developed ; external orbital spine comparatively small; distal upper end of meropodite of cheliped with two spines (in one specimen with three, the third anterior to the others, and small). April, 1905.] Odonata, Astacidae and Unionidae. 311 The specimens thus agree apparently with those mentioned by Faxon (1S9S) from Big Cahawba River, central Alabama, (Alabama River drainage), which are said to be intermediate bewteen extranens and girardiamis. The typical extraneus is reported from Etowah River, Rome, Floyd Co., Ga. (Alabama River drainage) ; the var. girardianus Fax. is known from Cypress Creek, Lauderdale Co., Ala., and from Eastanaula Creek, near Athens, McMinn Co., Tenn. (both belonging to the Tennes- see River drainage). The new locality belongs to the Cumber- land River, and it is remarkable that instead of finding here girardianus, we have a transitional form, which rather resembles extraneus. Rock Castle River, Livingston, Rock Castle Co., Ky. E. B. Williamson. 3. Cambarus piitnaini Fax. 2 males (second form), 1 female. Agree well with description. This species is positively known from the following localities only: Kentucky, Grayson Springs, Grayson Co.; Green River, near Mammoth Cave; Cumberland Gap. Rock Castle River, Livingston, Rock Castle Co., Ky. E. B. Williamson. FRESH-WATER MUSSELS. My specimens were kindly determined by Dr. Dall and a complete set has been placed in the National Museum. The following arrangement and nomenclature are those of Simpson's Synopsis from which work I have copied the distribution of each species. 1. Lampsilis ventricosus Barnes. Entire Mississippi drain- age; St. Lawrence system; Nelson River and tributaries. 2. Lampsilis multiradiatus Lea. Entire Ohio River drain- age; southern Michigan. 3. Lampsilis taeniatus Conrad. Tennessee and Cumberland River systems. 4. Lampsilis rectus Lamarck. Entire Mississippi drainage; Alabama River drainage ; Red River of the North ; St. Lawrence system. 5. Lampsilis trabalis Conrad. Kentucky and streams of Tennessee; Clinch River, Virginia. (3. Lampsilis glaus Lea. Ohio River drainage; Warsaw, Indiana; (probably St. Lawrence drainage) southern Michigan; W^hite River, Carroll County, Arkansas. 7. Medionidus acutissimus Lea. Alabama River system. 8. Medionidus subtentus Say. Tennessee and Cumberland River systems. 9. Tritogonia tuberculata Barnes. Mississippi drainage gen- erally ; streams falling into the Gulf of Mexico from the Alabama system west to Central Texas. 312 The Ohio Naturalist [Vol. V, No. 6, 10. Ptychohranchus phaseolus Hildreth. Ohio, Tennessee and Cumberland River systems; peninsula of Michigan; Kansas; Arkansas; Indian Territory; Louisiana. 11. Strophitus edentulus Say. Entire Mississippi drainage; St. Lawrence system and south in streams draining into the Atlantic to North Carolina; north in the British possessions to Lake Winnipeg ; southwest to central Texas ; Tyner, Alabama. 12. Pegias jabula Lea. Cumberland and Tennessee river systems. i;3. Alasmidonta t nut cat a B. H. Wright. Upper Mississippi drainage; Ohio, Cumberland and Tennessee River systems; Michigan; Upper St. Lawrence drainage. 1-1. Unio gibbosus Barnes. Entire Missippissi drainage; St. Lawrence and its tributaries; Alabama River system; southeast into Florida; southwest to the Guadalupe River, Texas. 15. Pleurabema clava Lamarck. Ohio, Cumberland and Tennessee River systems. 16. Quadrula coccinea Conrad. Entire upper Mississippi drainage ; St. Lawrence basin in various localities. KEY TO THE LIVERWORTS RECOGNIZED IN THE SIXTH EDITION OF GRAY'S MANUAL OF BOTANY. Edo Cl.\assex. This key was prepared for the purpose of making the work of determining the liverworts described in Gray's Manual more easy than it has been heretofore. Other characters have been added to the description of the perianth, here and there, that in case the perianth is wanting, it may be possible to find the name of the genus of the specimen in hand. In the archegonial "fiow^er" of the foliose liverworts the ped- icel together with the capsule is usually surrounded by three envelopes — the involucre, the perianth, and the calyptra. The external envelope, called the involucre, is formed by the uppermost Reaves which surround the base of the perianth. They usually differ from the lower leaves by their size and shape and are sometimes more or less connate with the perianth. The perianth, surrounded by the involucral leaves, is a sac- like envelope of oval or cylindrical form. It may be compressed or angular, smooth or folded and its orifice may be either entire or lobed, dentate or ciliate. Although usually present it is want- ing in Gymnomitrium and most of the frondose liverworts. After fertilization the ca])sule is formed in the interior of the archegonium and while develo])ing ru])tures the upper part of the same by the lengthening of its pedicel. The archegonium April, 1905.] Key to Liverworts. 313 thus modified and remaining at the bottom of the perianth rep- resents the calyptra. It is soft and hyahne and in most cases shorter than the perianth and not connate with it. It may be added that any suggestions in regard to the improvement of this key wiU be thankfuhy received. Ah hverworts are usuaUy divided into two artificial groups, the fohose and frondose, which are then subdivided as follows: Plant-body a leafy axis (Jungermanniaceae). 1 Plant-body a thallus. 30. 1. Leaves incubous. 2. Leaves succubons. 13. 2. Leaves coniplicate-bilobed or with a small lower lobe. 3. Leaves not complicate-bilobed or with a small lower lobe. 7. 3. Lower lobe incurved-ventricose or saccate, seldom expanded. 4. Lower lobe quadrate or roundish. (3. 4. Lower lobe incurved, more or less ventricose. Lcjcimia. Lower lobe saccate, seldom expanded. 5. 5. Branches intra-axillary, the leaves on either side free. Fridlania. Branches lateral, a basal leaf borne partly on the stem, partly on the branch. Jnbiila. 6. Lower leaf-lobe c^uadrate. Raditla. Lower leaf-lobe roundish. Porclla. 7. Leaf-divisions numerous and capillary. 8. Leaf-divisions not numerous and capillary. 9. 8. Leaves bilobed, lobes subdivided and with ciliate margins. Perianth present, terminating short branches, sinooth, obovate, mouth connivent, plicate-denticulate. Ptilidiuni. Leaves 4-o-divided', divisions setaceously multifid and fringed. Perianth none or rather forming together with the calyptra and involucre a terminal or axillary, f.eshy and hairy torus. Trichocolca. 9. Leaves deeply bilobed and 3-ranked (unclerleaves being similar- to leaves. Hcrbcrta. Leaves not bilobed and 3-ranked. 10. 10. Leaves entire (sometimes retuse) or 2-3-toothed. 11. Leaves 2-4-cleft or parted. 12. 11. Leaves entire (soinetimes retuse). Kantia. Leaves 2-3-toothed. Bazzania. 12. Leaves 3-(or seldom 4) parted; divisions capillary, formed by one row of cells. Blepharostoma. Leaves palmately 2-4-cleft or -parted; divisions formed by more than one row of cells. Lepidozia. 13. Capsule opening irregularly into 4 irregular or dentate valves; plant- body pseudofoliaceous. Fossombronia. Capsule opening regularly into 4 regular valves; plant body foli- aceous. 14. 14. Perianth absent; leaves closely imbricate and 2-ranked on short julaceous stems. Gymnomitriimi. Perianth present. 15. 15. Perianth connate to the middle or more with the involucral leaves. 16. Perianth free or connate with calyptra. 17. Ifj. Perianth connate to near the summit; leaves complicate-bilobed. Marstipclla. Perianth connate to the middle; leaves entire or nearly so. Xardia. 17. Perianth pendant, saccate; leaves bilobed, extending horizontally and at right angles from the stem; underleaves 2-cleft. Geocalyx. Perianth upright ; underleaves none or ovate-lanceolate or 2-4-cleft. 18. 314 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. V, No. 6, IF. Leaves complicate-liiloljed. 19. Leaves not complicate-bilobed. 20. If. Perianth oval, scarcely or not compressed, plicate; mouth denticu- late. Diplophyllnm. Perianth dorsally compressed, mouth truncate, bilabiate, decurved. Scapania. 20. LTnderleaves present (Plagiochila and Cephalozia mav be sought here). 21. L^nderleaves none or usually none. (Odontoschisma may be sought here). 20. 21. Leaves bilobed, bidentate or emarginate. 22. Leaves entire (sometimes retuse). 25. 22. Leaves emarginate; perianth connate with the calyptra. Harpanthus. Leaves bilobed or bidentate; perianth free. 23. 23. Underkaves 2-4-cleft or parted. Lophocolca. Underleaves entire or nearly so. 24. 24. Involucral leaves 2, connate at base, entire. Stems without runners. Leaf-cells roundish, 5-7-angular, cell walls much thickened, each cell appearing as if surrounded by about 6 smaller, 3 (or more)- angular ones. Mylia. Involucral leaves 3-ranked, bifid or bilobed. Stems with runners. Leaf cells round, surrounded by much thickened walls. Odontoschisma. 25. Underleaves 2-4-parted. Chiloscypkus. Underleaves subulate, fugacious. Jvingermatiivia. 26. Leaves bifid or bilobed. 27. Leaves entire (sometimes retuse) or spinulose-dentate. 28. 27. Perianth triangular .prismatic, the contracted mouth dentate. Cephalozia. Perianth oval-oblong, plicate, mouth denticulate. J ungerwiannia. 28. Leaves entire (sometimes retuse). 29. Leaves spuinlose-dentate, rarely entire, the dorsal margin reflexed; perianth compressed. Plagiochila. 29. Perianth cylindrical, wider above, truncate, depressed, with orifice prominently umbilicate, ciliolate. Liochlaena. Perianth compressed or terete, usually carinate, mouth entire or toothed. Jiuigcrmannia. 30. Capsule splitting into 4 regular valves (Jungermanniaceae). 31. Capsule not splitting into 4 regular valves. 35. 31. Thallus with distinct costa. 32. Thallus with indistinct costa or none. 34. 32. Thallus villous throughout or hairy (ciliate) on marign and midrib beneath. Metzgcria. Thallus smooth. 33. 33. Perianth long tubular; thallus mostly simple with sinuate or undulate margins, transparent, without inside cavities. Pallavicinia. Perianth none; thallus dichotoinous or radiate with pinnatifid mar- gins, opaque, with inside cavities filled with green cells. Blasia. 34. Thallus mostly simple or forked, with thick margin. Sporogonium rising from the underside near margin. Elaters persistent on tip of valves. Aneura. Thallus mostly palmatifid or pinnately lobed with thin margin (one layer of cells). Sporogf)nium rising from tlie up])er surface. Elaters persistent in the centre of the ca])sule. Pcllia. 35. Capsules solitary, more or less perfectly 2-valved (sometimes rup- turing irregularly), linear (Anthocerotaceae). 30. Capsules aggregate, pendant from the underside of a peduncled disk or cruciately arranged in 4 horizontal segments or sessile on the thallus or immersed in it. 37. April, 1905.] Key, Ohio Elms in Winter Condition. 315 3t>. Capsule narrowly linear, pedicelled, 2-valved. Elaters present. Anthoceros. Capsule very short, sessile, not valved below middle. No elaters. Xotothylas. 37. Capsule pendent from the underside of a peduncled disk or cruciately arranged into 4 horizontal segments (Marchantiaceae). 38. Capsule sessile on the thallus or immersed in it (Ricciaceae). 45. 38. Thallus barely costate or ecostate. Dumorticra. Thallus plainly costate. 39. 39. Gemmae present on sterile stems. 40. Gemmae none. 41. 40. Gemmae in cup-shaped receptacles. Fertile receptacle 7-11-rayed. Alarchantia. Gemmae in crescent-shaped receptacles. Fertile receptacles cruci- form. Luniilaria. 41. Perianth present. 42. Perianth none. 43. 42. Perianth scarcely exserted, 4-5-labed. Receptacle 2-4-lobed with as many alternate rib-like rays. Preissia. Perianth exserted half its length and cleft into 8-10 fringe-like seg- ments. Receptacle 4-lobed. Fimbriaria. 43. Thallus. large, .very indistinctly porose, scaleless below. Receptacle hemispherical, acutely 4-8-lobed. Asterella. Thallus s:nall or very large, porose. 44. 44. Thallus very large, without scales below. Receptacle conical, membraneous. Conoccphahis. Thallus small with purple scales below. Receptacle conic, hemi- spherical, truncately 3-4-lobed. Grimaldia. 45. Capsule sessile on the thallus; involucre inflated-pyriform. Spit aerocephalus. Capsule immersed in the thallus; involucre none. Riccia. KEY TO THE OHIO ELMS IN THE WINTER CONDITION. LixDLEY M. Smith. Ulmus L. Trees with medium heavy and medium hard wood and rough flaky bark in ridges; twigs brown, the terminal bud self-pruned; visible bud scales several, dry; leaf scars semi-oval, 2-ranked, oblique; bundle scars 3; stipular scars prominent; pith small, cylindrical, solid; some with corky ridges on the twigs, others with abundant self-pruning scars either in the annual nodes or at the base of the twig. 1. Twigs very rough pubescent; inner bark mucilaginous, pleasant to the taste; buds very hairy at the tips; twigs never self-pruned; buds shed abundantly. U. ftilva Michx. Slippery Elm 1. Twigs glabrous or slightly pubescent; not mucilaginous or slightly so, rather bitter; buds glabrous or if hairy rather small and pointed. 2. 2. Buds ovate short pointed, bud scales quite hairy; twigs without self- pruning joints in the annual nodes; none of the branches corky winged; cultivated. U. campcstris L. English Elni 2. Buds ovate-conic with long points, bud scales glabrous or somewhat pubescent; twigs with self-pruning joints in the annual nodes, often leaving peculiar stumps; native. 3. 3. None of the branches corky-winged ; buds pointed but rather elliptical, glabrous or nearh' so. U. amcricana L. White Elm 3. Some or many of the branches corky-winged ; buds very much pointed, somewhat pubescent. U. raccmosa Thomas. Cork Elm 3i6 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. V, No. 6, NOTES FROM THE OHIO STATE HERBARIUM. III. H. A. Gleasox. The genus Bidexs in Ohio. The species of the genus as represented in Ohio fall naturally into four well distinguished groups, the first including the simple leaved forms with or with- out ravs, the second the rayless species with divided leaves, the third the Coreopsis-like species with conspicuous rays, and the fourth the single species Bidens bipinnata, distinguished by its linear achenes and dissected leaves. The latter is our only rep- resentative of the section Psilocarpae of DeCandolle; the others with flat achenes belong to the section Platycarpae. The species of the northeastern United States have been confused in the recent floras, and this has led to a misunder- standing of the local forms. The keys and descriptions in this paper include only the Ohio species, and it is hoped that they will be of service to Ohio botanists in studying this interesting genus of Composites. A number of species now included in Bidens are in Gray's Manual and other earlier works referred to Coreopsis. Dr. Britton (Bull. Torr. Club 20:280, 281. 1893.) first pointed out their closer relationship with Bidens, including in that genus all forms with a pappus of upwardly or downwardly barbed awns, and limiting Coreopsis to those species in which the pappus con- sists of two short teeth, a mere border, or is entirely absent. The aquatic species known as Bidens beckii differs in many sig- nificant features from typical Bidens, and has been proposed by Professor E. L. Greene as the type of the new genus Megalodonta. The name of the Ohio species becomes accordingly Megalodonta beckii (Torr.) Greene. The most important recent literature on the genus is bv K. M. Wiegand (Bull. Torr. Club 26:399-422. 1899.), who gives keys and full descriptions of most of the species of Platycarpae, and bv E. L. Greene (Pittonia 4:242-284. 1901.), who discusses the nomenclatorial history of the genus and describes many new species. Key to the Ohio Species. 1. Achenes linear, not liattened. (Psilocarpae DC.) 1. B. bipi}i}iata. 1. Achenes cuneate to obovate, flattened. (Platycarpae DC.) 2. 2. Leaves simple, serrate or somewhat pinnatifid. 3. 2. Leaves pinnately parted or compound. 6. 3. Heads nodding on erect peduncles after flowering. 4. 3. Heads persistently erect. 5. 4. Leaves oblong, (i-lO cm. long, little or not at all narrowed at the base. 2. B. ccrnua. 4. Leaves elliptical. 10- IS cm. long, narrowed at the base. 3. B. cUiptica. 5. Outer bracts scarcely exceeding the disk, not more than L5 mm. long. 4. B. connata. April, 1905.] Notes — Ohio State Herbarium. III. 317 5. Some of the outer bracts twice as long as the disk or longer, the longest 20-75 mm. long. 5. B. comosa. 6. Rays none or very short. 7. (i. Rays large and conspicuous, bright yellow. 8. 7. Outer involucral bracts 4, achenes about 5 mm. long. (i. Fi. discoidea. 7. Outer bracts 6-8, achenes 6-8 mm. long. 7. B. frondosa. 7. Outer bracts 10-16, achenes 7-10 mm. long. 8. B. vidgata. 8. Achenes cuneate, the short awns narrowly triangular, upwardly hispid. i). Fi. trichospcrma. 8. Achenes cuneate to obovate, the slender awns two-thirds the length of the achene or more, barbed. 10. B. aristosa.. 1. Bidens bipinnata L. Stem much branched, 3-8 dm. high. Leaves slender petioled, ovate, 1-8-pinnately parted, segments ovate, deeply toothed or lobed. Heads long peduncled, 10-20- flowered, involucre oblong, 7-10 mm. high; achenes linear, four- sided, narrowed above, 7-15 mm. long, exclusive of the usually fottr downwardly barbed awns. In shaded places throughout the state. 2. Bidens cernua L. Stem sparingly branching above or sometimes from the base, 2.5-4.5 dm. high. Leaves oblong, about 1 cm. wide, acuminate, finely and regularly serrate except at the apex and base, cordate-clasping or connate. Heads few to several, erect in flower, nodding in fruit, about cS mm. high, outer bracts equalling or exceeding the disk; achenes four-angled, cuneate, 4-5 mm. long, awns four, 2-3 mm. long, retrorsely barbed. Specimens are in the State Herbarium from Cuyahoga, Geauga, Lucas, Madison, Mercer, Perry and Wayne Counties. 3. Bidens elliptica. (Wiegand). Bidens cernua elliptica Wiegand, Bull. Torr. Club 26:417. 1899. Stem erect, usually freely branching above or sometimes from the base, 3-8 dm. high. Leaves elliptical, typically 12-15 cm. long by 2-3 cm. wide, sharply serrate along the middle, long acuminate and conspic- uously narrowed toward the sessile or barely connate base. Heads very ntimerous, nodding in fruit, outer bracts exceeding the disk, ray flowers usually present and conspicuous; achenes cuneate, 5-6 mm. long, awns four, retrorsely barbed. Abundant in wet places along streams, apparently through- out the state. Bidens elliptica is one of the commonest members of the genus occurring in Ohio. However, it has never before been definitely reported from the state, probably l)ecause it is not described in the current manuals, where it is included under Bidens cernua. When its identity has been recognized it has been frequently confused with Bidens laevis, a coastal plain spe- cies with persistently erect heads, not found farther inland than central New York. Although originally described bv Wiegand as a variety of Bidens cernua, its stouter and branching habit, the numerous heads, the brighter green and larger leaves with 3i8 The Ohio Naturalist [Vol. V, No. 6, their characteristic elHptical shape and tapering base easily dis- tinguish it from that species and warrant its elevation to specific rank. 4. Bidens connata Muhl. Stem erect, branching above, 4-10 dm. high. Leaves lanceolate, sharply serrate, long acuminate at base and apex. Heads numerous, about 6 mm. high, rays none; outer bracts of the involucre about 5, 1-1.5 times as long as the disk, lanceolate-oblong, entire or minutely toothed; corollas 5-lobed; achenes cuneate, 5 mm. long, awns 2 mm. long, retrorsely barbed. There is but one specimen in the State Herbarium, from Wyandot County. 5. Bidens comosa (Gray) Wiegand. Stem diffusely branch- ing from the base, or with short branches above, 2-7 dm. high. Leaves elliptic, lanceolate, or narrowly ovate-lanceolate, coarsely toothed, acute or acuminate, tapering at the base into a winged petiole. Heads usually numerous, about 1 cm. high in flower, in fruit becoming 2 cm. high and 3 cm. in diameter, outer bracts 6-8, oblong to oblanceolate, foliaceous, serrate, twice as long as the disk or longer and reaching a length of 8 cm. ; corollas 4-lobed; achenes 7-10 mm. long, awns three, the longest 4-6 mm. Abundant in wet places, probably throughout. 6. Bidens discoidea (T. & G.) Britton. Stem freely branched, 5-15 dm. high. Leaves 3-divided, on slender petioles, leaflets lanceolate or narrowly ovate-lanceolate, sharply serrate, acute at the base, long acuminate at the apex. Heads numerous, 5 mm. high in flower, outer bracts 4, narrowly spatulate, exceed- ing the disk; achenes cuneate, about 5 mm. long, the two awns about 2 mm. in length. One specimen from Cedar Point, Erie County. 7. Bidens jrondosa L. Sparingly branched with spreading branches, 6-10 dm. high. Leaves 3-divided, usually thin, on slender petioles 3-5 cm. long, leaflets ovate-lanceolate, acute or rounded at the base, acute or short-acuminate at the apex, 5-8 cm. long. Heads relatively few, 5 mm. high in flower, much larger in fruit, outer bracts 6-8, narrowly spatulate, conspic- uously exceeding the disk, naked or sparingly ciliate at the base; achenes oblong or cuneate, dark brown to black, 6-8 mm. long, awns two, 4 inm. long. The three specimens in the State Herbarium, from Holmes, Meigs and Vinton counties, have been confused with Bidens discoidea. The^two species^are at once separated by the more numerous outer bracts and the much larger achenes of Bidens jrondosa, as well as by the laxer habit of branching in the latter species. According to Wiegand the leaves are sometimes 5-tlivided, but this was not ol)scrvcd in any Ohio s])ccimens. April, 1905.] Notes — Ohio State Herbarium. III. 319 8. Bidens vulgata Greene. Stem stout, erect and branching, 5-16 dm. high. Leaves pinnately 3-5-divided, on long petioles, leaflets lanceolate, acuminate, coarsely and sharply serrate or almost incised, 5-12 cm. long. Heads comparatively few, mostly on long stout peduncles, the largest becoming 2 cm. high and 3 cm. across in fruit, outer bracts 10-16, spatulate oblong, unequal and conspicuously exceeding the disk, ciliate at base; achenes brown, obovate, flat, 7-10 mm. long, the two awns 4-6 mm. long. Abundant in moist soil throughout the state. It has long been confused with Bidens frondosa, and under that name has been included in Gray's Manual and the Illustrated Flora. It is distinguished from Bidens frondosa by the larger heads, the coarser leaves, the more ascending branches, and the large broad achenes. The bracts, which are ciliate in Bidens vulgata, may possibly serve also as a distinguishing character. 9. Bidens trichosperma (Michx.) Britton. Tall and freely branched above in the usual form, although in peat bogs it mav bloom when but 2-3 dm. high. Leaves petioled, 1-2-pinnately parted, segments 3-10, narrowly linear-lanceolate or linear, acuminate at base and apex, sharply serrate along the middle or almost entire. Heads numerous and showy, outer bracts linear- spatulate, about equalling the disk; achenes cuneate, 5-6 mm. long, awns 2-3 mm. long, narrowly triangular, upwardly hispid or becoming smooth. Throughout the state, except possibly the extreme southern part, but especially common at the north. Widely variable in size and especially in the shape of the leaf -segments, which in specimens from peat-bogs are sometimes linear-spatulate, entire and rounded at the apex. From this extreme there is every gradation to the typical linear-lanceolate shape. The variety tenuiloba has been reported from the state and is undoubtedly included in the preceding description, but there is no valid reason for separating two forms in the Ohio material at hand. 10. Bidens aristosa (Michx.) Britton. Stems erect, freely branching, 4-10 dm. high. Leaves petioled, pinnately divided, segments 3-7, lanceolate, sharply serrate, acuminate at both ends. Heads very numerous, with conspicuous rays, outer bracts oblong or oblong-spatulate, equalling or shorter than the disk; achenes broadly obovate, 4 mm. long, with two slender barbed awns 3-4 mm. long. This western species has so far been reported only from the western part of the state. Three specimens are in the State Her- barium, from Champaign, Clark, and Madison Counties. Although in general habit it resembles Bidens trichosperma, it is easily and certainly distinguished from it by the broad achenes with their long slender awns. 320 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. V, No. 6, DEVELOPMENT OF THE EMBRYO SAC AND EMBRYO OF STAPHYLEA TRIFOLIATA.* Ll'MINA C. RiDDLK. Material for the study of Staphylea trifoliata, L. was collected along the banks of the Olentangy River during several Springs, killed in chrome-acetic acid and imbedded in paraffin. The sec- tions prepared varied in thickness from S-15 microns. Analin safranin and gentian violet, and iron-alum haematoxylin were used in staining, both giving good results although the latter stain was too dense for pollen grains. Staphylea trifoliata l)e]ongs to the Family Staphyleaceae and to the Order Sapindales and is thus allied to the Hippocasta- naceae, Aceraceae, Celastraceae, and Sapindaceae. Scarcely any morphological work seems to have been done on this Order so that very little comparison can be made between Staphylea and nearly related plants. Mottier, Bot. Gaz. 18:o75-o77, has reported on the development of the embryo-sac of Acer rubrum and some points of comparison will be noted later. Strasburger also made ol)servations on Staphylea pinnata and Acer in " Zellbildtmg and Zelltheilung" Jena, 1880; and " Neue Unter- suchungen ueber den Befruchtungsvorgang bei den Phaneroga- men" Jena LS84. As a general rule the flowers were quite normal in the num- ber of parts the only variation being four carpels instead of three in the gynoecium. The number of ovules in each carpel may be as high as eight but very rarely more than one matured in each cavity and often only one in the entire capsule. The ovules are anatropous and the best sections were those cut across the ovulary. As soon as the ovules were large enough they were removed from the capsule before killing. The integuments become too woody to make microtome sections long before the embryo is mature. There are two integuments on the ovule but no aril. The hypodermal archesporial cell (PI. 11), Fig. 1) appears l)efore there are any traces of integuments. In one case a three celled archesporium (Fig. 2) was found. The single archesporial cell cuts off a primary parietal cell (Fig. 3) which divides to form from three to five tapetal cells (Figs. 4-7) forcing the mega- sporocyte deep into the tissue of the nucellu^?. The megasporocvte then divides into four megaspores (Fig. 8) and the lowest becomes functional destroying the others as it enlarges and divides (Figs. 9-10). * Contriliul inns fi"i)in tlic Butanical Laboratory of the Ohio State Uni- versity, XIX. April, 1905.] Staphylea trifoliata. 321 The embryo sac widens slightly as it develops to the eight celled stage (Figs. 11-13) and the nuclei arrange themselves in the normal positions, three at the top becoming the synergidae and egg cell, the three lowest settle into a pocket and gradually disintegrate while the two polar nuclei approach each other and finally come to rest in contact. Sections which showed the archesporial cells showed the. microspores fully developed and the tapetal layer already break- ing down (Fig. 14). Older flowers gave thick-walled pollen grains having two nuclei, the pollen tube nucleus and the gen- erative nucleus. This pollen grain (Fig. 15) resembles those of Acer rubrum (Mottier) and Staphylea pinnata (Strasburger) . The latter reports the division of the generative cell into the two sperm cells after the formation of the pollen tube. The gen- erative cell stains quite dark and is apparently enclosed by a wall, making the entire pollen grain very similar to that of the staminate flower of Acer rubrum. In the formation of the definitive nucleus two polars usually unite (Fig. 13) but in several instances three exactly similar nuclei were found fusing (Fig. 17). In one case, however, there was found what seems to be the union of one of the sperm nuclei with the polars (Fig. 1(1). This third nucletis is surrounded by a small amount of cytoplasm which stains distinctly darker than that of the polars and the nucleus contains a single small dark nucleolus. After fertilization the embryo sac enlarges, the formation of endosperm occurs rapidly and the ovule increases greatly in size. The endosperm forms a large loose single layered lining for the entire embrvo sac before any division of the one celled embryo occurs. The ovules are about one-fourth the mature size before anything larger than a one-celled embryo is found (Fig. IS). The two-celled (Fig. 19), and four-celled stages (Figs. 20,21 and 25), were found in half grown ovules. Seeds which were full size but still not too hard to section contained embryos still too young to show the development of the cotyledons (Figs. 22-24). Capsules which contained these full sized ovules had attained their normal bladdery inflation. The endosperm was abundant but the nuclei had not begun the formation of walls so that the multinucleate cells which Strasburger finds in Staphylea pinnata were not observed. The synergidae have usually disappeared or are completely obscured by the abundant endosperm before the one celled embr^^o divides but in a few cases traces of them were seen with a four-celled embryo (Fig. 20). No traces of the antipodals were evident after division of the endosperm nuclei became rapid. Division of the suspensor occurs with the formation of the quadrant and seems to retrogress towards the basal cell '^r '^ '"\c L I B R A R Y U Ohio Naturai.ist. Plate XIX. RiDDl.K on " btaphylea trifoliata. Ohio Naturalist. Plate XX. Riddle on "Staphylea trifoliata. 324 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. V, No. 6, latter was not seen divided and its nucleus was quite vescicular even m rather young embryos (Figs. 23-24). The abundant endosperm completely surrounds the young embryo which at first develops very slowly. The outer integument becomes very hard, the inner one and the nucellus remaining very spongy and giving way to the growing endosperm. Ovules which contained mature embryos were found in the capsules of the previous year. Hand sections showed a flat straight embryo with two cotyledons (Figs. 20-27). There was no endosperm layer between the cotyledons. The hardening of the outer integument agrees with the observations of Guerin on Staphylea in his study of the seed integuments of some Sapindales. He also notes abundant "albumen" in both Staphylea and Melianthus. I wish to acknowledge my great indebtecbiess to Professor J. H. Schaffner for his invaluable assistance, and to express my hearty ap])reciation of his kindness. Bibliography. Coulter & Chamberlain. Mor])hology of Angios])erms.l9()3. GoEBEL. Outline Classification and Special Morphologv. Guerin, F. Developpement de la graine et en particulier, du tegument seminal de quelques Sapindacees. Journal de Bot- anique, 1901: No. 10-11. Mottier, D. B. Development of the embryo sac in Acer rub- rum. Bot. Gaz. 18:375-377. Strasburger, Ed. Ueber Zellbildung und Zelltheilung. Jena Zeitschr. f. Naturw. Bd. XIII, Suppl. Heft 2, p. 50. 188(f. Strasburger, Ed. Neue Untersuchungen ueber den Be- fruchtungsvorgang bei den Phanerogamen. Jena. bSS4. Explanation of Plates. For the figures 1-15 a Leitz microscope with No. 0 ocular and No. 7 objective for all but Figure 14 which was drawn with a lower power. A Bausch and Lomb instrument was used for all the other drawings. For Figure IG the 1-2 ocular and 1-12 oil immersion were used. For Figure 17 the 1-in. ocular and 1-12 objective; for Figures 18-22 the l-in. ocular and 1-0 objective; for Figures 23-24 a 2-in. ocular and l-() objective and for Figures 25-27 the 2-in. ocular and the u|)|)er lens of the 2-3 objective. plate XIX. Fiti^. 1. Archesporial cell. Fig. 2. Three celled archesporium. Fisr. :>. Primary jiarielal cell and nu\c^as])()rocytc. Integuments beginning t(j develop. Fig. 4. Three tapetal cells and megasporocytc. F"ig. ."). Two tapetal cells; megas])orocyte enlarging. Figs. ()-7. Four and live ta])etal rvUs. Fig. 8. I'onr tajjctal cells and lour megasporcs. April, 1905.] A New Aspidiotus. 325 Fig. 9. Four tapetal cells, two celled embryo-sac and disintegrating megaspores. Fig. 10. Two celled embryo-sac beginning to destroy tapetum. Fig. 11. Four celled embryo-sac. Fig. 12. Eight celled embryo-sac showing antipodals already settled in pocket. Fig. 13. Egg apparatus, conjugating polar nuclei and antipodals. PLATE XX. Fig. 14. Stamen showing pollen sacs and pollen grains. Fig. 15. Older pollen grain with thickened wall. Fig. 16. Polar nuclei and a sperin nucleus. Fig. 17. Three nuclei fusing to form definitive nucleus. Fig. 18. One celled embryo. Fig. 19. Two celled embryo. Figs. 20-21. Four celled embryos. Figs. 22, 23-24. Older embryos. Fig. 25. Half grown ovtile showing four celled embryo, endosperm lining, nucellus and inner integument shi"ivelling, and outer integviment developing hard tissue. Fig. 26. Flat section of mature seed showing hard integument a-b and outline of embryo imbedded in endosperm. Fig. 27. Longitudinal section of a mature ovule through a-b showing cotyledons and plumule. Endosperm around but not between cotyledons. A NEW ASPIDIOTUS FROM AESCULUS GLABRA. H.\RLAN H. York. Aspidiotus (DiaspidiotMs) ohioensis n. sp. Female scale cir- cular, slightlv convex, margin irregular, 1-2 mm. in diameter, dark or dirty gray, exuviae orange red, sub-central and covered with dark excretion. When removed from the bark, the scale leaves a conspicuous white patch. Female: Median lobes broad, notched on lateral margin near apex and sometimes notched near the apex on the inesal margin. Second lobes rudimentary, slightly developed on inner-angle, often not present. First interlobular incision shallow, broader than deep, chitinous processes usually fused into a solid process, occasionally furrowed. Second interlobular incision similar to the first, only smaller, the chitinous process seldom furrowed. Some- times there is a very small incision laterad of the second incision. There is usually a small chitinous process at the inner base of each median lobe. A simple and a forked plate, sometimes two to three forked plates laterad of median lobe, one to three forked plates between the first and second incisions and usually one simple and one to three forked plates laterad of second incision. Spines prominent, longer than the plates. On the dorsal surface, one spine at the base of the outer margin of each median lobe, one on each of the rudimentary lobes, one about one-third of the distance from the median lol.)e to penultimate segment and one about the same distance from the penultimate segment. The spines on the ventral surface are shorter than those of the dorsal 326 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. V, No. 6, surface, a spine slightly laterad of each corresponding dorsal spine, except the one at the base of the median lobe. There are five groups of circumgenital glands. Median group 3 to 7, generally 4 to 5 arranged in a single row, sometimes grouped together, anterior lateral 12 to 15; posterior lateral 7 to 11. Dorsal pores numerous and quite prominent. Pygidiuni of female. Dorsal marign of the pygidium of female. This species was found on Aesculus glabra on Ohio State University campus, March 24, 1905. While it resembles A. ancylus, it is distinguished from this species by the shape and character of the incisions and chitinous processes, the number and arrangement of the median gland orifices, by the number of spines and by the absence of the spine-like extensions of the margin between the third and fourth pairs of spines. Aspidiotus ohioensis is close to A. aesculi and A. aesculus sub. sp. solus. The spines are more numerous, the incisions are not alike, and the median gland orifices more abundant. This is one of the several forms that may prove to be varie- ties of Aspidiotus ancylus on a more exhaustive study. A large number of mounts were made and the points men- tioned were observed many times. The author is very grateful to Prof. Herbert Osborn for his valuable suggestions in the above description and drawings. April, 1905.] Epistylis flavicaim. 327 THE RATE OF GROWTH IN EPISTYLIS FLAVICANS. F. L, Laxdacre. The writer recently had an opportunity to observe the rate of growth in one of our common stalked Protozoa, Epistylis -flavicans Ehr., and the changes in form of the animalcule which accompany this growth. A good deal of interest attaches to the rate of growth of the pedicle in stalked forms on account of the fact that two species frequently otherwise similar may be differentiated by the length of pedicle. A form with branched pedicle, which in its adult condition may be easily differentiated by the pedicle, is with dif- ficulty separated from other species if its pedicle is still simple as it is in the earlier stages of growth. Each form having a branched stalk passes through a stage in which its stalk is simple and it is then sometimes with difficulty separated from the forms with unbranched pedicles. The frequency with which these immature forms are met with depends of course upon the time required for a detached zooid to acquire a pedicle characteristic of the adult form. If this is done uqickly, for instance, in a few hours, comparatively few immature forms would be encountered. If the period of growth is longer, for instance, several days or a week, one ought to find immature forms rather frequently. Dtiring the three summers spent in work on Protozoa at Sandusky no case of growth except the present instance was observed that could be measured. This may be due to the fact that work was com- menced about the first of June each year which would be after the period of maximum growth among the Protozoa, this period coming earlier in the spring. In the present case the attachment of the free swimming form was not observed. But in mounting a slide for observation a large colony of Epistylis flavicans was found many of whose zooids were detached and swimming about. Within a short time one was found attached and its rate of growth observed. It could have been attached only a short time for it still had the typical cylindrical shape characteristic of free swimming forms (Fig. 1). The posterior circle of cilia was vibrating rapidly and there was only a faint movement of the cilia visible in the region of the gullet. In three minutes it had assumed the form of Fig. 2. The posterior cilia were vibrating a little less rapidly. There was a cone shaped extension at the posterior end of the body equalling one-thircl of the total body length and extending proximally from the posterior circlet of cilia. The body had begun to assume the normal shape the adoral cilia were vibrating and the 3-^8 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. V, No 6, total width of the peristome was about two-thirds of the adult form. In two minutes more it had assumed the form shown in Fig. 3, the posterior end had narrowed considerably and while the constriction extending from the posterior ciliary wreath was still one-third the total length of the body its attached end had assumed the appearance of the adult pedicle. The lengthening of this pedicle had every appearance of growth and not of meta- morphosis of body into pedicle. The body while producing the pedicle was actually larger than before, and although the form was feeding rapidly it is hardly conceivable that assimilation and growth could take place at the rate at which the pedicle appeared. J T (j-^eO DESCRIPTION OF PLATE. Fig. 1 Four stages in the growth of the pedicle of Ephistylis flavicaus Ehr. p. c. — posterior circlet of cilia, p. — pedicle appearing first in Fig. 3. At the end of five minutes more (Fig. 4) the body of the animalcule was nearly normal in every respect except that the slight elevation on which the posterior circlet of cilia had been situated could still be observed although the cilia had been retracted. The pedicle at this time was one-sixth the length of the body and the animalcule was feeding actively. From this point on only the relative rate of growth in the pedicle will l)e given as no opportunity offered to note any other histological changes than those pertaining to the lenghtening of the pedicle. At the end of five minutes more or a total of fifteen minutes in all the pedicle was equal to one-fourth the length of the body ; in twentv minutes one-third; at twentv-five minutes one-half; at thirty minutes, thirteen-twentieths; at thirty-five minutes, four-fifths, and at the end of forty minutes equaled the bod)- in length. It was not observed again for a period of forty-five minutes during which time the pedicle had attained a length equal to three times that of the body. This is somewhat under the nor- mal, the unbranched pedicle usually being four to five times that of the body. So that a period of one hour and a half was suf- ficient to produce a pedicle nearly equal to the unbranched por- April, 1905.] Meeting of the Biological Club. 329 tion of the adult colony stalk. Of course to make this observa- tion complete the rate of division in the zooid should be observed and also the rate of production of the branched portion of the pedicle. At the end of one hour and thirty-five minutes the posterior circlet of cilia began to appear and in an hour and fifty-five minutes the animalcule became detached and swam away. The presence of the cover glass, the lack of oxygen and food all three probably prevented the completion of the growth and probably retarded the later stages of it but otherwise it seems normal and furnishes some idea of the rate at which the single stalked and branched stalked forms of Protozoa produce their pedicles. The rapid rate of growth also accounts for the rarity with which one finds immature forms especially those with compound pedicles and vet they do occur frequently enough to render the difficulty of identifying these forms very great. These observations were made in August and the rate of growth mav be quite clifTerent from that occurring earlier in the summer during the period of greatest activity among the Protozoa. MEETING OF THE BIOLOGICAL CLUB. Orton Hall, Feb. 6, 1905. The vice-president, Miss Riddle, called the club to order. The minutes of the previous meeting were read and approved. Prof. Schaffner spoke of a short letter which he had received from Prof. Kellerman. The part}^ in Central America were enjoving the trip very much but v/ere too busy to write. The first paper of the evening was by Mr. L. H. SchoU on "Cotton and its By-products." Cotton has been raised in Texas since the Anglo-Saxon settlement and now the state produces one-fourth of all the cotton in the U.S. The Cotton Boll Wevil introduced from Mexico about 1892 has threatened the cotton interests of the state. But it has been found that by increased and better cultivation, change of crops, clearing the ground, etc., cotton can be raised in spite of the wevil. Formerly the cotton seeds were thrown into the rivers or burned, but recently science has shown that this perhaps is not the least valuable part of the crop. The products are used chiefly for feeding cattle but the meal is also used for fertilizer. Cotton seed oil is used in place of olive oil, for salad oils, butter oils and is used to adulterate many other oils as linseed. The lint from the seeds is made into cotton batting, paper, etc. The stalks yield a good fiber. The honey taken by the bees from the glands on leaves, stems and 33° The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. V, No. 6, flowers is also valuable. Mr. Scholl exhibited a fine line of sample of the various by-products of cotton seed. Mr. Dresbach presented a paper on the "Form and Structure of the Red Blood Corptiscle." Weidenreich of Strassburg con- tends that the mammalian erythrocytes are not biconcave but bell-shaped. His conclusions are based: (1) upon the fact that when the corpuscles are fixed with osmic acid, immediately upon escaping from the blood vessels, the great majoritv have the bell form; (2) the corpuscles have this form in isotonic solutions as a .65% NaCl solution for mammalian corpuscles; (3) Weiden- reich claims to have seen the bell-shaped cells in the circulating blood of the ral)bit. He concludes that the biconcave form is due to the extreme sensitiveness of the corpuscle and is pro- duced by slight increase of the density above the normal. As to the structure of the corpuscles, Weidenreich thinks that they consist of a distinct cell wall which encloses the haemoglobin and other constituents. The behavior of the cells in such fluids as water, salt solutions, tannic acid solutions, etc., points to the presence of a cell wall. No stroma or framework exists. Mr. Dresbach also reported that an extended study of the case of elliptical human red corpuscles, which he described last year has confirmed his opinion that the extraordinary shape was normal in the subject and not due to any known disease. It was prob- ably of embryonic origin or possibly congenital. Mr. Metcalf reported the probable occurence of the Swamp Sparrow in Ashland County in the latter part of December. He also reported the Kildeer, Canvas Back Duck and Horned Grebe observed at the same time as unusually late. The club adjourned to meet the first Monday in March. F. M. Surface, Sec. Date of Publication of April Number, April 24, 1905. ■%. \3 ^ *- • ne Ohio ^hl^atuialist, PUBLISHED BY The Biological Club of the Ohio State University Volume V. MAY, 1905. No. 7 TABLE OF CONTENTS SCHAFFNER— The Xiiture of the Reduction Division and Kel;Ued Phenomena 33T Fischer— A L'st oi Uhio Plants with Compound Leaves 3iO York— The Agar-Agar and Paraffin Method for Imbedding Plant Tissues 344 Cotton — Life History Xotes on A pion nigrum 346- CusHMAN — A Few (_)hio Desmids 349 Jones— Memorial of the Ohio Aeadeniy of Science on the Death of Prof. A. A. ^^■right. . 351 Surface— Meeting of the Biological Club 352 THE NATURE OF THE REDUCTION DIVISION AND RELATED PHENOMENA. John H. Schaffner. It is generally conceded that the primitive plants and animals were nonsexual. In the primordial life of the earth no conjuga- tion of any kind took place. Some organisms have come through all the geological ages in this primitive condition but the great majorit}^ even of the lowest forms have acquired some type of sexuality and retained it while a considerable number have no doubt fallen back from a sexual to a nonsexual condi- tion. If the process of sexual conjugation of cells is then not a primitive property or function of protoplasm various questions naturally suggest themselves. 1. What caused the original nonsexual forms to develop the sexual process? 2. What disturbances were introduced in the life cycle of the organism and in the cell activity? 3. In what ways were the new life cycles established? 4. How do the life cycles of plants compare with those of animals? 5. What significance does the reduction division have in the higher forms? In most plants conjugation takes place between two naked gametes, and it is probable that such specialized types of sex- uality as are present in the Conjugatae and Phycomycetes orig- inated from the more typical gamete conjugations. We can readily believe that all the Archeophyta were naked cells and 332 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. V, No. 7, that the cell wall was developed as a protective covering. When these primitive cells were in process of division there could be an interchange of food from the one to the other so long as the protoplasmic connection was not completely cut. After complete separation the two daughter cells, still lying in contact, could exchange food by osmosis, the one having a less amount of food taking from the one having a greater supply. After the two cells had separated they might exchange food in the same way on coming in contact for any length of time by accident. In this way sexual evolution may have had its beginning as well as parasitism in all of its forms. After the process of temporary or permanent conjugation was once established it would be of advantage to the species under many adverse conditions. A set of starved or weak organisms meeting with a well nourished lot could conjugate either temporarily or permanently, greatly to their advantage, without doing the stronger individuals any special harm. Such is apparently the behavior of various lower organisms at the present time. Furthermore a swarm of uni- cellular organisms or zoospores in a given area is, by conjuga- tion, reduced to just half the previous number. The mere reduction in the number of units might be a very important fac- tor in the immedi.ate welfare of the species especially when the further delay of reproduction incident to the process of conjuga- tion is taken into account. In many of the lower plants the arrival of adverse conditions is the stimulus to the formation of resting zygospores or oo.spores by means of which the organism is preserved until a more favorable environment is again at hand. Rejuvenescence, using the term in its broadest sense seems at least a very plausible cause of the origin of sexuality if it is once admitted that conjugation is not one o.' the fundamental prop- erties of the protoplasm of primordial organisms. Other means of rejuvenescence should serve the same purpose as the stimulus and reaction which one mass of protoplasm must exert on another during conjugation, leaving out of consideration the fact of the reduced space occupied by the two united organisms and consequently the less surface in contact with the surrounding medium. A tree may be rejuvenated by placing a fertilizer al:)Out its roots. So organisms which naturally rejuvenate only through conjugation may be rejuvenated through a favorable change of food or other factors of environment, thus actually delaying the necessity of a conjugation for a long period of time. Whether conjugation was long or short in its evolution is of no special importance in the discussion of the remaining ques- tions formulated above. The first time that nucleated cells con- jugated so completely as to act in cell division as a single cell a disturbance was present not operative in the race previously. The two nuclei having fused contained twice the amount of May, 1905.] The Nature of the Reduction Division. 333 chromatin as before and from two sources, therefore with some- what different hereditary tendencies. Evidently a fusion or mixing and doubHng of nuclei generation after generation is impossible, especially if the chromatin is organized into definite chromosomes. A reduction division of some kind is the inevitable accompanyment of a conjugation process in the life cycle. This fact being recognized we may proceed to find out in what ways the life cycle may be established. Theoretically a number of possible modes may be developed and the reduction division established at three points in the life cycle. a b \ % 0^@-(j^-®->(x) @ Fig. 1. Diagrams of vaiious types of life cycles 1. Suppose an organism with x chromosomes to give rise to zoospores which conjugate completely; the resulting zygote would have 2x chromosomes. If, however, reduction takes place at the first division or germination of the zygote, the new organ- ism would have the reduced or x number of chromosomes. The double number of chromosomes exists only in the resting stage of the zygote and the result is a simple sexual cycle, the gametes being produced without a reduction division (Fig. la). 2. If an organism with x chromosomes gives rise to con- jugating zoospores, the zygote will contain 2x chromosomes. 334 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. V, No. 7, Suppose that this spore, on germination, fails to reduce the chromosomes. The resulting individual will have the double number in each cell. Now if, when reduction takes place, the cells reduce the chromosomes and the resulting cells are gametes, a new condition arises in which a "2a:" sexual generation orig- inated from an ":r" nonsexual type gives rise to gametes as the result of a reduction division. A simple sexual cycle is estab- lished with a "2x" sexual generation producting gametes as the result of reduction (Fig. 1 b). Such plants as Fucus must have established their life cycle in this way. The Fucus plant is a 2x sexual generation which develops ovaries and spermaries. A cell in the ovar}^ undergoes the reduction division and by further divisions usually produces eight eggs with x chromosomes each. In the spermaries a cell also undergoes reduction and by subse- quent divisions a number of spermatozoids are produced having the X number of chromosomes. 3. The third point at which the reduction division may be established is after the sporophyte stage in connection with an alternation of generations. Suppose a nonsexual organism develops zoospores which conjugate and the zygote fails to reduce the chormosomes at the first division. An individual is produced with 2x chromosomes. When zoospores are produced as the result of a reduction division they come out not as gametes but as non- sexual spores which give rise to an x generation. This genera- tion being similar to the original generation produces gametes without reduction which have the x number of chromosomes. This is the process in the plants with a true, antithetic alternation of generations. A gametophyte generation is followed by a sporo- phyte generation which reduces the chormosomes before the development of nonsexual spores (Fig. 1 c). Other life cycles might be and perhaps are developed. A sporophyte coming from the z3"gote might develop spores with- out reduction and these might develop into gametophytes with the 2x chromosomes, and the gametes would then be produced as the result of a reduction division (Fig. Id). It will be yeen, therefore, that there are two types of sexual or gamete-producing generations, one with the 2x chromosomes giving rise to gametes through reduction, the other with x chromosomes giving rise to gametes directly without reduction. Now in the higher plants the life cycle is invariably estab- lished, unless in abnormal cases, with an alternation of genera- tions, a gametophyte generation with x chromosomes is followed by a sporophyte generation with 2a: chromosomes. The reduc- tion division takes place in special cells, sporocytes, and usually by two successive divisions. The resulting spores have the reduced number of chromosomes and represent the first cell of the gametophyte generation (Fig. 2). There is no more reason May, 1905.] The Nature of the Reduction Division. 335 for saying, as some do, that the gametophyte generation begins with the sporocyte than it would be to insist that the first stage of the sporophyte consists of the egg and sperm before conjuga- tion. The gametophyte is, of course, the sexual generation and the sporophyte the nonsexual generation, both from the mor- phological and physiological points of view. In the higher plants the gametophytes are very much reduced and some have insisted in retaining the old misapplied sex terms for the sporophyte. But this leads merely to a confuison of terms and ideas. To compare pollination, the growth of the pollentube, and the other processes connected with the development of the gametophytes of higher plants with fertilization, as it exists in the sexual gen- erations of plants and animals, is only comparing things that are not even analogous and giving such diverse meanings to sex terms that they lose their real significance entirely. yatietofiji 9 S'forophji* Fig. 2. Diagram showing principal stages in the hfe cycle of the higher plants. Injthe higher animals we appear to have a condition similar to|that in Fucus, a ''2x" gamete-producing organism in which reduction takes place before the formation of gametes. The egg with its polar bodies represents four original eggs comparable to the four spermatozoids developed from the spermatocyte. It is interesting to note that in some of the Brown Algae part of the eight eggs which are produced after reduction also degenerate. Furthermore, the eggs of the Fucaceae are discharged while in all 336 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. V, No. 7, Ohio Naturalist. Hate XXI, ^Ul^HS-lrfy «< >-"a u ■- o r^ «0 * 5 1 4^ -^ Id uo\iv-t\\>A-"^£ vffi^o^K'^-'^ MOiJp^t^i^J^^ «(?/^9-Xl^(^»>' -2 •" \ ! a o — a* S o o N o t £ e % 1 - 4 6 •U 01:^-3 Tn^d^ V oi:jsr.8aj^ y genetian violet, Dela- field's haematoxylin and Haidenhein's iron-alum-haematox\lin. The latter well known stain proved to be the most successful m the stages of the development of the megaspores and embr\'o- sac, while Delafield's stain gave the best results with the microspores. The flower of Sanguinaria begins its development early in the summer and the ovules and stainens are considerably advanced by the end of September. Material taken on Oct. ()th showed the single, hypodermal, archesporial cell distinctly differentiated (Fig. 2). The ovules at this time were just beginning to curve 1)ut no traces of the integuments were discernable (Fig.l). At this time the microsporocytes were just separating (Fig. 19) and a few of the tapetal cells already had two nuclei. There are three intermediate layers between the epidermis and tapetum (Fig. 19). Material taken on Nov. 9th showed but little change in the development of the ovules, except that they had elongated and the curving was much more marked. The integuments were just beginning to make their appearance Ijut the archesporial cell was still undivided. At this time the microsporocvtes had undergone some division and some tetrads were observed. The tapetal cells contained two nuclei (Fig. 20). By Dec. 9th the archesporial cell had divided twice giving rise to the megasporocyte with two parietal cells above (Fig. 3). The curvmg of the ovule was much more marked than m the previous stage and the beginnings of both integmnents could be readily seen in central sections. The division of the micro- sporocytes must have proceeded rather rapidly for at this time the micros] )ores were present with large resting nuclei and the tapetum was dissolving (Fig. 21). In this stage the microspores ])ass the winter. No material was taken from December until the first of March when it seemed that the weather conditions were favor- able for the continued growth of the ])lant. Sections of material fixed March Ist showed that there had been but little activity during the winter months. One of the parietal cells had again (livicled s(j as to form a row of three cells above the large mega- sporocvte (Fig. 4). In some instances transverse division had taken place forming a considerable tissue (Fig. o). The integu- ments had increased quite a little in size and now reached more than hair way around the developing ovule. The curving of the ovule was compk'te at this time. The micros]jores were in ])ractica]lv the same stage in which they were found in Decem- Ijer. The nucleus was undivided but the vacuole in the center Nov., 1905.] Life History Saiiguinaria canadensis. 381 of the microspore had enlarged so that the nucleus was forced to one side of the cell. Material taken on March 13th showed but little change from that taken on the previotis date. The megasporocyte had enlarged quite a little and seemed to be pre- paring to divide (Fig. 4), and a few spindles were observed (Fig. 6). The microspores showed no change. Material fixed on March 22nd showed that the megasporocyte had divided into four megaspores the lowest being the large functional one (Fig. 7). The arrangement of the megaspores varied considerably. In some cases the transverse walls were nearlv parallel forming a row of cells but frequentlv they were verv irregular (Figs. 7, 8). These divisions are interesting in that the\' show a great similarity to the divisions of the micro- sporocyte and often result in a nearly typical tetrad (Fig. 8). Above the megaspores the rows of parietal cells could be dis- tinctly seen (Fig. 7). These varied in number but it is evident that considerable division has occurred in the three original parietal cells. Vesque (1) states that Papaver orientale has no parietal cells. The nuclei of the microspores were divided at this time (Fig. 21). Pollen grains taken at later dates did not seem to show any further division. It is probable that the gen- erative cell does not divide until after the tube has been formed. Strasburger (2) however, reports that in Papaver the generative nucleus divides in the pollen grain. From this time the development of the functional megaspore is rather rapid. Material taken on March 28th showed the com- plete eight celled embryo-sac and often the two polar nuclei had already fused to form the definitive nucleus (Fig. 9). The antipotals are rather large at this stage and each has a single nucleus. Material taken on April lOth showed the oosphere and definitive nucleus still undivided but the antipodals were verv large and each contained two nuclei (Fig. 10). This stage corresponded with material taken the vear before at al)Out the same date. The egg then seems to be fertilized about the first week in April. Many of the sections show remains of the pollen tube which is very prominent (Figs. 10, 11). The svnergids seem to disappear early. Remains of one or more of them could usuallv be seen at this stage, Iving to one side of the oospore and staining very dark (Figs. 10, 11). The earlv divisions of the embryo seem to occur very slowly for it was not until May 12th that the first division was observed (Fig. 13). This makes a remarkablv long period of rest for the fertilized egg. In material killed May Kith the three celled eml)ryo was found (Fig. 14). The divisions of the definitive nucleus had l)cgun in earlv April and bv the latter part of that month the en^j^f^^jn^ had' 20 to 30 nuclei. 382 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. VI, No. 1, The development of the embryo from this stage on was not traced very closely but the divisions must occur rather rapidly for on May 23rd the embryo had reached about the 12-celled stage (Fig. 15). On May 29th a large spherical embryo was present (Fig. Hi). The suspensor had lengthened considerably and sections showed a dovible row of cells (Fig. 1(3). At this time the antipodals were degenerating (Fig. 17). They lie in a broad depression at the base of the sac which is greatly enlarged and tilled with endosperm. The behavior of the antipodals recalls the condition of these cells in certain Ranunculaceae. On June (ith the ovules had matured and were falling to the ground. The integument is very hard and it was found necessary to remove it before imbedding in paraffin. At this time the embryo was much larger and the two cotelydons were well developed (Fig. 18). The suspensor was still present but showed signs of degeneration. SUMMARY. The flowers of Sanguinaria begin to develo]) verv earlv in the summer previous to the year in which they blossom. The development of the microsporocvtes and microspores is much more rapid than that of the megaspores for the micro- spores are formed before the winter season begins. The ovule passes the winter in the megasporocvte stage and during March its development is very rapid while the microspore does not renew activity until the last of March and early April. Three parietal cells are formed and later these divide forming a parietal tissue of considerab'e size. The division of the megasporocyte frequently results in rather typical tetrads. The generative nticleus does not appear to divide in the pollen grain. The long resting ])eriod of the oosphere is especialh' interesting. BIBLIOGR.VPHV. 1. VHsguE, J. Nouvelle recherches sur le development du sac embryon- naire des Phanerogames Angiospermes. Ann. Sci. Nat. Rot. VI, 8:261 3<)(), Pis. 12-21. 1879. 2. vStrasburc.kr, E. ■' ■ § Neue Untersuchungen uber den Befruchtungsvorgang bci (Icn Phanerogamen. Jena. 1884. 3. Shaw, Chari.ks H. Notes on sexual generation and the develo])ment of the seed coats in certain of the Papaveraceae. Bull. Tor. Bot. Club 31:429 43:}, PI. 15. 1904. Nov., 1905.] Life History Sanguiiiaria canadensis. 383 The above paper was prepared in the Department of Botany of the Ohio State University as a minor for the degree of Master of Arts. The work was done under the direction of Associate Professor J. H. Schaffner, to whom the writer wishes to express his sincere thanks for the kind assistance and suggestions, without which the paper could not have been completed. DESCRIPTIONS OF PL.\TES. All drawings were outlined under a camera lucida with the following optical combinations: Bausch and Lomb — 1 oc, if obj. — Fig. 1. Bausch and Lomb — 1 oc, ^ obj. — Figs. 20. 21. Bausch and Lomb — f oc, ^ obj. — Figs. 2-8, V.^, I.j-IT, 22, 2;j. Bausch and Lomb — 2 oc, ^V obj. — Figs. IS, 19. Leitz — 4 oc, 7 obj. — Fig. 10. Leitz — 6 oc, 7 obj. — Fig. 14. Zeiss — 18 oc, Leitz 7 obj. — Figs. 9, 12. Zeiss — 18 oc, Leitz 3 obj. — Fig. 11. Section of young ovulary, showing incipient ovules. Killed \rchesporial cell. Killed l()-(3-'()-l. Megasporocyte with two parietal cells. Killed 12-9-'04. Megasporocyte with three parietal cells. Killed ;:5-13-'05. Megasporocyte with parietals divided. Killed .':}-l-'05. First division of megasporocyte. Killed 3-i;i-'05. Four megaspores and parietal cells. Killed 3-22-'0.5. Four megaspores showing tetrad arrangement. Killed Eight celled embryo-sac Killed 3-28-'0.5. Embrvo-sac with oospore. Antipodals with two nuclei. '04. Outline of ovule with oospore. Killed 4-10-'O4. Oospore with remains of synergids. Killed 4-16-'04. Two-celled embryo. Killed 5-12-'04. Three-celled embryo. Killed 5-16-'04. Young embryo showing eight cells in section. Killed Spherical embrycj with long suspensor. Killed 5-29-'04. Degenerating antipodals. Killed .5-29-'04. Embrvo showing large suspensor and cotvlcdons at the time . Killed 6-6-' 04. Section of stamen with microsporocvtes and tapetal cells. Killed 10-6-'05. Fig. 20. Section of microsporangium showing microsporocytes just before formation of tetrads. Tapetal cells with two nuclei. Killed ll-9-'05 Fig. 21. Microspores with remains of tapetum. Killed 12-9-'05. Fig. 22. Single microspore. Killed 12-9-'05. Fig. 23. Pollen grain. Killed 3-22-'05. Fig. 1. ; 10-6-'04. Fig. 2 Fig. 3' .^ Fig. 4. : Fig. 5. Fig. 6. ; Fig. 7. ] Fig. 8. ] 3-22-'0.5. Fig. 9. ] Fig. 10. Killed 4 -16-' Fig. 11. Fig. 12. Fig. 13. Fig- 14. Fig. 15. 5-23-'04. Fig. 16. Fig. 17. Fig. 18. the seed falls „ Fig. 19. 384 •■'■■-■■ The Ohio Natni-oUst. [Vol. VI, No. 1, Ohio Naturalist. /'/(?/(• A'A7' Slkface on "Sanyuinaria. Nov., :1905.] '■■ ! Life History Sanguinaria canadensis. ;85 Ohio NatukaivIst. /Yaie XXl'I 2.0 Surface on "Sanguinaria " 386 The Ohio Naturalist [Vol. VI, No. 1, THE CLASSIFICATION OF PLANTS, II. JOHX H. SCHAFFNER. The three series of plants (Thallophyta, Archegoniata, and Spermatophyta) fall into smaller groups which also represent a succession of higher and higher stages of progressive develop- ment. If the theory of evolution as accepted at present is sub- stantially correct, it becomes evident that some forms of plant life remained in the lowest condition from the beginning while others advanced to higher and more complex stages. Why did large numbers of species develop and continue until the present time without advancing to any appreciable extent from the starting point? The question can be answered by assuming that groups of organisms varied and were specialized in a direc- tion which interfered with further progress upward but not with further variation along subordinate lines. Other groups varied in a direction which led to higher possibilities without imposing a barrier while still others passed back from a higher to a lower condition. Based on the conception of vertical or progressive evolution, the development of the plant kingdom may be arranged some- what as follows: 1. Genesis of living organisms. 2. Primordial organisms or Archeophyta, supposed to have been naked, amoebid cells of the simplest structure. o. Transition to encysted and wall cells of the types found in the lowest plants of the present time. 4. Nonsexual plants consisting of simple cells, masses, or filaments. ."). Development of sexuality or of conjugating organisms. (). The lower types of sexual plants. 7. Gradual development of the higher and more complex types, manv with a simple alternation of generations. 8. The'hig:her Thallophytes. 9. Transition to typical land plants and adaption to aerial conditions. 10. The lowest plants with a typical antithetic alternation of generations and with a simple parasitic sporophyte. 11. Gradual development of a more complex sporophyte. 12. The higher plants with a well developed dependent sporophyte. 13. Transition to plants with an independent mature sporophyte. 14. Plants with homosporous sporophytcs with true roots, leaves, and tibro-vascular tissue. 15. Development of heterospory. Nov., 1905.] The Classification of Plants, II. 387. ■% 16. Archegoniates with heterosporous sporophytes and greatly reduced unisexual gametophytes. 17. Development of the seed hal)it and siphonogamic fertilization. 18. Seed plants with open carpels without stigmas and with much reduced parasitic gametophytes. 19. Development of x^losed carpels with stigmas and begin- ning of the conjugation of polar cells with further reduction of the female -gametophyte. 20. The highest seed plants, representing the extreme of progressive development. Taking the living plants which are delimited by definite transition gaps, readily distinguishable, we can recognize seven great groups. These are represented in the above scheme as follows: First group, No. 4; second group, Nos. 0, 7, 8; third group, Nos. 10, 11, 12; fourth group. No. 14; fifth group. No. 10; sixth group, No. 18; seventh group. No. 20. The transition from the first to the second group is very gradual and it may sometimes be difficult in practice to place certain species properly, but the progression from nonsexual to sexual plants is so fundamental and apparently so important for all further advance that this mav be regarded as the most important step taken in the entire plant kingdom. The changes in the life cvcle and in the conditions of heredity are very far reaching. It is also important to have this group defined for purposes of general discussion. The seven groups may be called subkingdoms. A subkingdom may then be defined as a group which represents a definite stage of evolution in the plant kingdom and which can be delimited from higher or lower groups bv a distinct break or hiatus or by a definite transition involving a progressive change in the life cycle of the individual. It becomes necessary to select names for these subkingdoms. Unfortunately the larger groups have not received any very extensive consideration from systematists. No definite system is here attempted but the names given below have for the most part been used in connection with the groups which they represent. I. Protophyta. Protophytes. II. Nematophyta. Nematophytes. III. Bryophyta. Bryophytes. IV. Pteridophyta, Homosporae. Homosporous Pterido- phytes. V. Pteridophyta, Heterosporae. Heterosporous Pterid- ophvtes. VI. Gymxospermae. Gymnosperms. VII. Angiospermae. Angiosperms. 388 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. VI, No. 1, • The first and second subkingdoms are Thallophyta; the third, fourth, and fifth are Archegoniata ; and the sixth and seventh are Spemiatophyta. It is often convenient to separate the chlorophyll-bearing Thallophvtes from those without chlorophyll. Thallophytes with chlorophvll are Algae. Thallophytes without chlorophyll are Fungi. Protophvtes with chlorophyll tire Protophyceae. Pro- tophvtes without chlorophyll are Protomycetes. Nematophytes with chlorophvll are Gamophyceae. Nematophytes without chlorophyll are Eumycetes. The seven subkingdoms may be characterized as follows: I. Protophyta. Protophytes. 3,000 known living species Plants without sexuality, representinj^ direct descendants from prim- itive nonsexual organisms; typically unicellular, the cells free, in colonies, in plasmodial masses, or in simple or branched filaments which are free or fixed and in the more highly specialized forms with definite base and apex; nonmotile, or having locomotion either by means of fiagella, cilia, or pscudopodia, or by the general contraction of the cell; holophytic or phagophytic; with chlorophyll or without; reproduction by simple fission, by zoospores, or by walled or encysted spores l:)y means of which the plant survives dessication. II. Nematophyta. Nematophytes. 57,000 known living species. Plants which have developed sexuality, some type of conjugation being present except in some groups which are supposed to have under- gone degeneration from sexual- ancestors; the more highly developed forms frequently Avith a primitive alternation of generations: plant body usually filamentous, either simple or branched, free or fixed, but in some groups unicellular, coenobioid, or a complex solid aggregate; chlorophyll present or absent, the great majority of species without chlorophyll living in aerial conditions as parasites or saprophytes, those with chlorophyll usually being hydrophytes. III. Bryophyta. Bryophytes. About 14,000 known living species. Plants, visually of small size, in which there is a typical sporophyte l)ut this never having an independent existence, being supported on the gametophytc in a parasitic condition during its entire life; without true vascular tissue, true roots, or leaves, but sometimes with true stomata; always homosporous. Gametophyte comparatively large, consisting of a thalloid frond or a stem -like, scaly frond, usually preceded by a fila- mentous jirocmbryo, the protonema, which develops from the spore. IV. Pteridopiiyta, Homosporae. Homosporous Pterido- phytes. 2,800 known living species. Plants in wliich the herbaceous or tree-like sporophyte, after the juvenile stage, has an independent existence with true fibro-vascular tis- sue, roots, and leaves, and with a terminal growing point; homosporous and either eusi)orangiate or leptosporangiale. Gametophyte usually rather large, normally hermaphrodite altliougli ol'tcn unisexual; thalloid and green but sometimes tuberous and subterranean and witliout chlorophyll Nov., 1905.] The Classification of Plants, It. 2>h Ohio Naturalist. Plate AA7 7/ <-0 «5 (V -p 0- -P ^ \ 1^-A 1—^ / / -*> 0 c ^; ^"^ , , / *■» ' o \ 0^ \ \ Brv/ophi/ta / ^ I. IS «9 ft: fit ylr-cheophyba Diagram showing relationships of the Plant Subkingdonis. 39<3 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. Vl, No. 1, V. Ptekidophvta, Heterosporae. Heterosporous Pterido- phvtes. (Jo") known living species. Plants in which tlie sporophyte, in the hvinj^ species, is herbacecnis and after a brief embryonic stage has an independent existence with true libro- vascular tissue, roots, and leaves; heterosporous, with micro- spores and megaspores which give rise to greatly reduced male and female gametophvtes respectively; eusporangiate or leptosporangiate. Gameto- phytes alwavs unisexual, with little or no chlorophyll, li\'ing on fcjod stored in the spore and developing entirely inside of the spore wall or protruding only slightly through the side, the nonsexual spores often germinating before being discharged. VI. Gymnospermae. Gymnosperms. 450 known living species. Plants in which the sporophytes are woody perennials with open carpels (megasporophylls) without a stigina and hence with naked ovules and seeds, the pollen (male gametophvte) falling directly on the micro- pyle of the ovule (megasporangium) ; flowers monosporangiate, visuall\- developing as cones but sometimes very siniple; female gametophvte with numerous cells but without polar cells and thus without true cnrlo- sperm as in the Angiosperms; male gametophyte much reduced but usuallv with vestigial vegetative cells; male cells two, either nonmotile sperms or developed as spirally coiled inulticiliate spermatozoids. VII. Angiospermae. Angiosperms. 125,000 known living species. Plants in which the sporophj^tes are of diverse habit, from minute annual or perennial herbs to large trees; ovules in a closed carpel (mega- sporojjh'i'll) or set of carjxls provided with an ovulary and with a stigma for the reception of the pollen (male gametophyte) which must develop a long poUentube, usuall_v ])assing through the open cavit\' of the ovulary, before reaching the micropyle; flowers more commonly showy and highly specialized and more commonly bisporangiate ; female gametophyte greatly reduced, normally with eight cells two of which, the polar cells, conjugate to form the definitive cell from which the endosperm is de\'el- oped; male gairietophyte consisting of three cells two of which are non- iTiotile sperms, one used for fertilization and the other in many cases uniting with the definitive cell thus ]iroducing a triple fusion. Nov., 1905.] New Species North American Chrysops. 39 ^ NEW SPECIES OF NORTH AMERICAN CHRYSOPS. Jas. S. Hix&. Of the four species described in this paper three were taken in Guatemala. The other one is from eastern United States and is described at this time for the reason that a student of the group desires to mention the species in a paper he is preparing for pubhcation. The Guatemalan material was |3rocured in com- pany with Mr. E. B. Williamson of Bluffton, Indiana. Chrysops melanopterus, n. sp. Female, black, first two seg- ments of the antenna each longer than the third. Length, 9 millimeters. Relative length of the antennal segments 2:1.5:1. Basal seg- ment without indication of enlargement as is the case with other species of the genus having the first and second antennal seg- ments elongated. AA^hole body, including wings, legs and antennae, black. Type taken at a point about five miles vip the railroad from Puerto Barrios, Guatemala, Department of Izabal, March 14, 1905. The locality was along the railroad where it passed through an extensive swamp only a few feet above sea level. Two other specimens were procured at the same place, one from the back platform of a freight caboose. The specimen followed the moving train for some time before it was captured. The species is entirely distinct from any species I have seen or have found described. The uniform black wings are peculiar for a member of this genus. Chrysops pachycnemius, n. sp. Female wing with costal margin and crossband black, apical spot separated from the crossband; abdomen yellow at the base, black apically. Length, 8 millimeters. Lower part of the front, including the frontal callosity, and the face yellow; palpi a shade darker than the face, proboscis black. Region of the ocehi shining black, otherwise the upper part of the front covered with bright yellow pollen. First seg- ment of the antenna yellow, second yellow on the inner side, l)rown outside, third black. Thorax shining black with four dorsal stripes formed by yellow pollen, the two inner abbreviated behind, the two outer broken at the transverse suture; side of the thorax with a yellow spot behind the eye, one directly beneath the root of the wing and another just behind it. Wing with the base, costal cell and the crossband black, apical spot separated from the crossband by a wide space, extreme base of each costal cell black, the inner margin of the crossband extends from the branching of the second and third veins nearly straight to the anal vein passing near the inner end of the discal and fifth 392 TJie Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. VI, No. 1, posterior cells. The crossband reaches the posterior margin of the wing filling out the apex of the anal cell and all the fourth and fifth posterior cells with the exception of a small patch at the distal end of the latter; the outer margin of the crossband starts from the union of the first vein with the costa and extends in a somewhat irregular curve to the end of the vein which separates the third and fourth posterior cells. The apical spot fills out the apexes of the marginal and first submarginal cells and invades the second submarginal, reaching the posterior border of the wing at the apex of the vein which separates the latter cell from the first posterior. All the femora black at each end, otherwise yellow, tibia black, all of them quite distinctly enlarged, but the anterior pair more than the others; anterior tarsi black, others with the first segment wholly yellow and remaining segments with apexes more or less black. First seg- ment of the abdomen above narrowly yellow on the sides, second segment yellow for its entire width on each side but this color narrows toward the front border until at the mid-dorsum where the two meet it is very narrow ; a niid-dorsal yellow marking on the second and third segments, widened and triangular on the second and elongate and narrow on the third ; the posterior third of the fourth segment yellow; venter with first two segments yellow, remainder black. Type taken at Santa Lucia, on the Pacific slope of Guatemala at an altitude of about a thousand feet, February 1, 1905. Chrysops calopterus, n. sp. Female with black body and variegated wings. Length, G millimeters. Face and palpi yellow, antenna yellow, except the annulated portion of the third segment which is black; region of the ocelli shining black, frontal callosity yellowish on the disk and black al)ove, otherwise front covered with gray pollen. Thorax black with indications of stripes on the anterior part ; legs black except a broad ring on the distal part of each femur and basal segments of each tarsus which are yellow. Anterior fourth of each basal cell, entire costal cell and marginal cell to beyond the stigma are infuscated. The black of the crossband and apical spot are much l)roken u]) and the hyaline triangle is crossed and encroached upon ])y dark markings; there is a very dark quad- rangular s])ot at the furcation of the third vein; the discal cell is hyaline with an irrcgluar dark ])atch at its middle; the pos- terior margin of the wing is infuscated all the way to the fifth posterior cell and more pronounced at the intersection of the veins; the veins at the inner ends of the discal, first, fourth and fifth posterior cells are widely margined with black. None of the cells of the wing except the costal are entireh- infuscated, and none are entirely hyaline excei)t the axillary. Abdomen black Nov., 1905.] New Species North American Chrysops. 393 on the dorsal side except segments two, three and four each have a transverse gray marking on the posterior border. Type taken at Los Amates, Guatemala, 60 miles inland from Puerto Barrios, at an elevation of perhaps 250 feet, Februarv 21, 1905. Other specimens were procured at Morales and at Puerto Barrios. Chrysops dimmocki, n. sp. Female, body colored like callidus, wing like montanus. Length, 8 millimeters. Frontal tubercle black, front covered with a greenish gray pollen which follows the margins of the eyes to the occiput widening somewhat, below the frontal callosities. Face' light yellow, palpi darker, proboscis brown. First and second seg- ments of the antenna and base of the third yellowish and clothed with rather course black hairs, remainder of third segment black. Thorax above with four rather wide greenish gray stripes which are slightly less distinct posteriorly. Legs mostly yellow, but apical parts of middle and hind tarsi blackish ; front legs with apex of tibia and whole of tarsus black or dark brown. Wings with costal margin and crossband black, first and second basal cells with very slight infuscation at base; the crossband reaches the posterior margin, filling out the fourth posterior cell, outer border curved, fifth posterior cell largelv hyaline in the middle but plainlv infuscated along the veins at each side ; apical spot wide, filling out all the marginal cell, two-thirds of first sub- marginal and half of second submarginal. The abdomen has a small black spot on the first segm.ent beneath the scutellum, second segment with a black inverted V whose apex reaches the anterior margin, otherwise yellow, remaining segments with the exceptions of the lateral and hind margins black, the hind margin expands into a triangle in the middle on each segment; venter yellow with dark markings toward the apex. Type taken at Longmeadow, Massachusetts, by Dr. Geo. Dimmock. Eight other specimens taken at Columbus, and Wauseon, Ohio, and Anglesia and Westfield, New Jersey, those from the latter state by V. A. E. Daecke and PL S. Harbeck, of Philadelphia. This species has been in my collection for a long time and I hesitated to name it for the reason that no male specimen could be procured, but the characters are so constant and so manv s])ecimens have been collected and sent in that it seems that it nnist l)e distinct. 394 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. VJ, No. i, BRUSH LAKE PROTOZOA. LU.MINA (". RlDDI.K. During the Fall of 1902 the writer studied and listed the Algae found at Brush Lake, Champaign Co., Ohio, and the list was published in Ohio Nat. 5:208; at the same time a careful record was kept of the Protozoa found in the same material and was reported at the 1903 meeting of the Ohio Academy of Sci- ence bv Professor F. L. Landacre as the writer was at that time located in the West. Delay in publication has been due to the writer's anxietv for accuracy in nomenclature and citations. As far as has been possible the names have been arranged after Rutschli's system, taking the classification from Calkins' "Pro- tozoa" and Blochman's "Die Mikroskopische Thierwelt des Suesswassers." My grateful acknowledgments are due to Professor Land- acre, and to Professor L. B. Walton of Kenyon College, for the use of literature in revising the list. I RHIZOPODA Fam. Atnocbidae. Amoeba proteus L. Dact^iosphac'riunl radinsuin Klnii;,'. Amoeba villosa Wall. Fam. Arccllidac. Arcella dentata Ehrbg. ' Difflugia iirceolala Carl. Arcella vulgaris Ehrbg. Centropyxis aculeata Ehrl)g. Difflugia corona Wall. Actinophrys sol Ehrbg. HELIOZOA. Fam. A pJirotkoracidae. WASTIGOPHORA. Fam. Hcteromonadidac. Anthophysa vegetans(().F.M.) S.K. Spumclla vivi])ara f"]irl)g. Fam. Euglciiidac. Euglena oxyuris vSchmarda. Phacus jnTum (I-^hrl)g) ,S. K. P2uglena spirogyra Ehrbg. Phacus lri<|ucKT IClirbg. Euglena viridis Ehrbg. Fam. Astasidac. .Astasia trichophora (Ehrbg) C'la]i. l"am. /'crani'uiidac. EnLosiphcju o\-atus Stokes. Fam. I'cridinidac. IV'ridinium tabulatiini lihrbg. INFUSORIA. Pam. /''nrlirliiu'dac. PseU(lopn)ro(l(m ni\'eus f^hrbg. Arachnidium glubosuni S. \\. Coleps hirtus (). F. M. Didinium nasutuni () V .M . Coleps uncinatus C & L. Nov., 1905,] Brmh Lake Protozchi.. 395 Fani. 'rrachclitiidac. Trachelocerca olor O. F. M. Linnotus helus Stokes. Trachelocerca versatilis O. F. M. Loxodes maynus Stokes. Lionotus fasciola (Ehrbg) Wrzes. Loxodes rostrum O. F. M. Fain. C ^}ilamydodontidat\ Nassula ornata Ehrbg. Fam. C'hdiferidac. Holosticha caudata Stokes. Glaucoma scintilkms Ehr1)g. Leucophrys patula Ehrbg. Colpidiurn putrinum Stokes. F a m . Vrocent rida c . Urocentrum turbo O. F. M. Fam. Paramoccidac. Paramoecium aureha O. F. M. Fam. Plcnroucmidac. Pleuronema glaucoma O. F. M. Fam. Isotricliidar. Plagiopj'la nasuta Stein. Fam. Plagiotoiuidac. Metopus sigmoides C. & L. Spirostomum aml)iguum lilnbg. Fam. IJursaridac. Bursaria truncateha O. F. M. Fam. Stcutoridac. Stentor coeruleus Ehrbg. Caenomorpha oxyura Stein Stentor polymorphus Ehrbg. (Gyrocorys). Fam. Oxytrichidac. Stichotricha aculeata Wrzes. Gonostomum affine Stein Uroleptus dispar Stokes. (Plagiotricha). X^roleptus longicaudatus Stokes. Stylonychia mytihis O. F. M. Uroleptus rattulus Stein. Stylonychia pustulata (). F. M. Uroleptus sphagni Stokes. Histrio inquietus Stokes. Fam. Eiiplotidac. Euplotes carinata Stokes. Euplotes variabilis Stokes. Euplotes plumipes Stokes. Aspidisca costata Duj. Fam. Vorticcllidac. Scyphidia inclinans (D'Udek) S. K. Vorticella similis Stokes. on Nais. Opercularia elongata Kellicott. Vorticella aquaedulcis Stokes. Cothurnia crystallina lihrbg. Vorticella hamata Ehrbg. Vaginicola gigantea D'Udek. A'orticella nebuliferti Ehrbg. Lagenophrys vaginicola Stein. Vorticella procumbens From. ;96 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. \h Xo. 1, AN ABNORMAL CONE OF PINUS LARICIO. Walter Fiscukr. It has l^een customary to try to explain the homolot^y of the ovuliferous scale in the Conifers h^' the study of monstrosities. So the chance discovery on Mav 12 of a cone of Pinus laricio which was. both- carpellate andstaminate led the writer to look up again the numerous theories which have l)een advanced to explain this structure. Fig. 1. — 1. Tlie al)normal cone, carpellate bract and ov-uliferous scale. side of stamen. Under side of carjiel showini,^ Upper side of same. 4. Under The cone was one of two growmg in the normal position of the staminate cone and consisted of two well marked zones, the lower or staminate part making up about four-fifths and the upper or carpellate part making up about one-fifth of the entire cone, 'i'hc other cone was staminate oiily. As a closer examina- tion showed that l)()th kinds of sporojjlndls were perfectb' nor- mal, their description will correspond to that of those on other cones. The carj)ellate jjart l)ore bracts on the u])])er sides of which were the ovuliferous scales bearing the ovules or mega- s])orangia. The staminate ])art of the cone bore l)tit one kind of scales, the stamens or micros])or()i)hylls bearing the micros])o- rangia on the under side. Nov;'vl9G5.] ' N'otes from Ohio Siait Herbarium.. 397 Since the homology of the stamen, and the bract subtending the seed bearing scale is evident, the^contention is still concern- ing the homology of this extra strltcture the ovuliferous scale. As an excellent summary of the numerous theories relating to this subject is given in Coulter and Chdmberlain's Morphology of Spermatoph3'tes, and as their repetition here would be entireh- beyond the scope of this article, they may for convenience be condensed into the two following simple propositions: First. The carpellate cone represents a regular l)ranch ; the bract represents a leaf; the ovuliferous scale represents an axillary stem with one or with two leaves all greatly reduced and modified and it may or may not also represent the outer integument. Second. The carpellate cone represents a dwarf branch like the staminate cone ; and the ovuliferous scale is a ligular or chalazal outgrowth of the megasporophyll or carpellate bract which corresponds to the microsporophyll. The W'riter is inclined to favor the second view not onlv from the sttidy of this monstrosity if any great importance is to be attached to it but also for the same reason that Bessev gives in his article in the Botanical Gazette, 33:157, namelv, that were we to favor the first view we would have to assume that the megasporangiate cones and sporophvlls in the closelv related families of Finales, in some of which there is no ovuliferous scale, are not homologous. NOTES FROM THE OHIO STATE HERBARHIM. IV. H. i\. G'LFASON. During the past year much of the unidentified herbarium material has been studied, and a number of particular genera have been worked over, with the result that several species of flowering plants and ferns are to be added to the state flora. A list of those species with notes on their distribution and their distinguishing characters is here given. Some of them have already been reported in this journal, but for sake of complete- ness are listed again. In every case the w^riter is responsible for their identification. 06b. Asplenimn parvulum Mart, and Gal. Ohio Nat. o:20G. 460a. Carex alata jerntf^inea Fernald. Along Big Darby Creek in Madison Covmty, Professor W. A. Kellerman. The variety, as described by Fernald (Proc. Am. Acad. Arts and Sci. 37:477. 1902.) differs from the species in the spikelets tawny colored from the first, the narrower ovate perigynia about 2.5 mm. wide, and the ovate-lanceolate scales. The species has 398 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. VI, No. 8, i;]Mkelets mostly green, ijerigynia 2.8-3.7 mm. wide, almost orbicular, and narrower scales. 472b. Alayaca auhleti Michx. Auglaize County, A. Wetz- stein. The occurrence of this aquatic species so far north of its usual range is of much interest. 547a. Smilax pulverulcnta Michx. Montgomery County, S. E. Horlacher. Distinguished from Suiilax hcrbacea, which it closely resembles, by the pubescent lower surface of the leaves. 755a. Gomphrena globosa L. An Amaranthaceous plant fre- quently cultivated for ornament and escaped in Wood Countv, where it was collected by Professor Kellerman. S77a. Boccovia conlata Willd., the Plume Poppy, likewise commonly cultivated, has escaped around London, Madison Countv, and specimens have been sent to the herl)ariuin by Mrs. K. D. Sharp. 1033a. Aronia atropnrpurea Britton. Ohio Nat. 5:2G4. 1058a. Cassia medsgeri Shafer. Ohio Nat. 5:204. 1245a. Hvpcricjtiii horeale (Britton) Bicknell. Ohio Nat. 5:249. 1794a. XantJiium commune Britton. This, our commonest species of Cocklebur, has generally been confused with Xanthiinn landdensc. It is at once recognized by the densely hispid- pubescent spines of the burs ; all other species in our region have burs either glabrous or merely puberulent. the hairs never exceeding the diameter of the spines. 17941). XantJiiutn glabratam (DC.) Britton. Apparently common in southeastern Ohio, extending north and west to Franklin County. It is distinguished by the glabrous burs with beaks straight or nearly so. 19(33a. Bidens eUiptica (Wiegand) Gleason, and 1967a, Bidens vulgata Greene, are described in Ohio Nat. 5:310. Mr. L. D. Stair, of Cleveland, has contrilnited the following s])ecics, all from Ctivahoga County: 131 a, Panicum impHcatum Scribn.; 190a, Agrostis aspcrijolia Trin. ; 212c, Bcckmannia crucaejormis (L.) Host.; 255a, Festuca capillata Lam.; B ramus brizaejormis Fisch. and Mey.; 205c, Bromus arvensis L.; 376a, Carex tenuis interjecta (Bailey) Britton; 1303a, Kncifjia jruticosa piloscUa (Raf.) Britton; 1015a, Scrophularia kporclla Bicknell; 1893a, Aster latcrijiorus horizontalis (Desf.) Bvirgess. Mr. S. E. Horlacher, of Dayton, has added 757b, Allionia nyctagi)iea ovata (Pursh) Morong; l()50b, Gerardia tcnuifolia aspenila Gray; 1755a, Cicliorium intybus divaricaium DC. Nov., 1905.] Xews and Xotes. 399 NEWS AND NOTES. The fifteenth annual meeting of the Ohio State Academy of Science will be held at The University of Cincinnati, on Dec. 1st and 2nd. A number of important papers will be presented and a very interesting meeting is anticipated. Ohio Plants With Extr.\-Floral Glaxds. The following plants should be added to the list of Ohio plants having extra- floral nectaries and glands, as given in The Ohio Naturalist 4:108-106. With glands on the petiole or at the base of the blade: Impatiens balsaniina L. Ascyruni hypericoides L. With tooth-like glands on top of the midrib or at its base: Aronia arbutifolia (L-) Medic. " atropurpurea Britt. nigra (Willd.) Britt. Pyrus communis L. ]\Ialus angustifolia (Ait.) Mx. Some weeks ago the Zoological Museum received from a for- mer student, Mr. John C. Britton, a fine donation consisting of a pair of large Iguanas nicely mounted. Mr. Britton gives the following account of their capture: "While travelling in the Bahama Islands in the summer of 1903 we visited Watlings or San Salvador and were told by the natives there that great numbers of large lizards lived on an island or kay in the lake which occupies nearly one-half of the island or Watlings. We were directed to the spot by guides and found that the stor}' was true. On this small island there must have lived hundreds of large iguanas and all of one species belonging to the genus Cyclura. It mav be mentioned incidentally that this island,, called Iguana Kav by the natives, is very near the spot where Columbus is supposed to have landed. These reptiles are very swift on foot ancl extremely shy. After much difficulty we suc- ceeded in shooting a number of specim.ens. When we returned to the United States the iguanas were given to Dr. Leonard Stejneger of the United States National Museum for description. They were described as a new species and given the name Cyclura rileyi in honor of Mr. J. H. Riley with whom I was^ associated as a member of the expedition." — J. S. H. 400 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. VI, No. 1, MEETING OF THE BIOLOGICAL CLUB. Ortox Hall, May I, 190;"). The club was called to order by the President, Prof. Hine. The minutes of the previous meeting were read and approved. The program for the evening consisted of an address on "The Present Status of Darwhiism," by Prof. Edward L. Rice of the Ohio Wesley an University. Prof. .Rice gave a brief review of Darwin's work and the conditions under which "The Origin of Species" was published. Darwin really gave us nothing new in his theory but he gave the actual data for evolution, and it was for this reason that his work attracted so much attention. For- merly the struggle was l^etween science and religion, l)ut now it is between scientists as to the method of evolution. Ultra- Darwinians go far beyond Darwin with the theory of natural selection and many, as Weisman and Haeckel, deny Lamark's theory entirely. Whether it is inheritance or environment that inakes the arm of the blacksinith's son strong and that of the preacher's bov weak is the important question. A recent article in the American Field Journal by Redfield of Chicago, on the evolution of the setter may possibly have some bearing on this subject. In tracing the history of the offspring of two male dogs it was found that the oft'spring of the one which had been used constantlv in the field appeared seven times in chami>ion trials. Offspring of the brother of this dog, which had l)een kept for stud purposes only, did not occur among the champion dogs. It is the general verdict of breeders that horses and dogs give better offspring if not kept for stud purposes only. Prof. Rice mentioned several of the objections which had Vjeen raised against the theory of natural selection and attem])ted to show that these might not all be entirely valid. In a summarv, Prof. Rice stated that he believed that man\- laws were operative in producing the results of evolution. In regard to their effectiveness he Ijelieved that they w^ould stand in about the following order: Darwin's and DeVries' theories first, Romanes second, and sexual selection and environmental influences of less importance. Mr. Henriksen, Prof. Landacrc, Miss \\'ilson, and Prof. Schaffner took part in the discussion which followed. J. H. (iourley and Miss Caroline Carmack were elected to memberslii|». The club then adjourned. Fk.\xk M. SuRi'WCK, Sc\'y. Date of Publication of No\eiiibcr Number, Noxembtr 3, 1<'05. The Ohio V^aturalist, PUBLISHED BY The Biological Club of the Ohio State Uni'versity, Volume VI. DECEMBER, 1905. No. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Ortmann — A New Species of Cambarus from Louisiana 401 Gleason— Notes from the Ohio State Herbarium. V 403 Berger— Habits and Distribution of the Pseudoscorpionidae, Principally Chelanops oblongus, Say 407 SCHAFFNER — Key to the Ohio Dogwoods in the Winter Condition 419 ScHAFFNER, Mabel— Free-floating Plants of Ohio 420 Surface — Meeting of the Biological C'lub 422 A NEW SPECIES OF CAMBARUS FROM LOUISIANA. Dr. a. E. Ortmann, Carnegie Museum, Pittsburgh, Pa. The types and cotypes of the new species described herein were collected by Professor Jas. S. Hine on July 12, 1905, in a small freshwater pool, J^ mile from Gulf Beach, near Cameron, Cameron Parish, Louisiana. There are 2 males of the first form, and 4 females. They were found associated with a number of large and small individuals of Cambarus {Cambarus) clarki Gir. Cambarus (Cambarus) hinei spec. nov. (See Fig. 1). Description of male of the first form. Rostrum triangular, about twice as long as broad on the basis; margins very slightly convex, almost straight, rather evenly converging to the acute tip, with a very slight indication of lateral angles at the base of the short acumen. No marginal spines. Upper face of rostrum flat at the base, slightly concave toward the tip; margins slightly elevated. Postorbital ridges short, divergent posteriorly, sharp at anterior end, but without distinct spine. Carapace ovate, slightly compressed, punctate. Infraorbital angle blunt. Branchiostegal spine small. Cervical groove sinuate. No lateral spines on carapace. Areola as long as or slightly shorter than half of the anterior section of carapace, very wide, with 4 or 5 irregular rows of punctations. Abdomen as wide as, and longer than carapace. Anterior section of telson with two spines on each side, posterior section rounded. 402 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. VI, No. 2, Epistoma with anterior part triangular. Antenna! scale rather broad, broadest in the middle. Flagdhmi longer than carapace, but shorter than bodv. First pereiopod subcylindrical. Hand elongate, subcylin- drical, very slightly compressed, margins subparallel. Surface covered with fine granulations and a few short, scattered hairs. Palm long; fingers remarkably short, hardly over one-third as long as palm, with some scattered hairs. Cutting edges without tubercles. Carpopodite short, and almost smooth, without dis- tinct sulcus on upper side, and without spines or tubercles on inner side. Meropdite smooth, without tubercles or spines, its lower margin densely pilose. Ischiopodites of third and fourth pereiopod with hooks, that of the third is long and strong, conical, that of the fourth is smaller, but distinct and of similar shape. Coxopodite of fourth pereiopod with a prominent, semicircular, compressed tubercle; that of the fifth pereiopod with a small, conical tubercle. First pleopod rather short and stout, reaching to the coxopodite of the third pereiopods. Its distal third is thinner than the proximal part, slightly tapering, gently but distinctly curved backward. Tip truncate, with two sharp, pointed, triangular horny teeth, belonging to the outer part. Inner part pointed at tip, point straight, slightly directed outward, distinctly longer than truncated part, and also longer than the horny teeth. Inner face of inner part with a row of beard-like hairs. The male of the second form is unknown. Fig. I. Cambarus In the female, the chelipeds are much shorter, /inieJsptx. nov. Male chicflv SO the hand, and the fingers are onlv sexual organ of lett ,. , - , , ' , , %^ ^ , ,,- side, inner view, slightly shortcr than the palm. Hand hardly Enlarged. granulated, but with scattered hairs, more abundant than in the male. Pilosity of lower margin of meropo- dite wanting. Annulus ventralis a simple, rounded, low" tubercle with an S-shaped fissure. Measurements: i (Type): Total length: 35 mm.; carapace: 16, areola: 5. width of areola: 2.75; abdomen: 19 mm.; length of hand: 13 mm., width of hand: 3.5, length of palm: 9.5, of fingers: 3.5 mm. 9 (Type): Total length: 45 mm.; carapace: 21, areola: 7, width of areola: 3.5, abdomen: 24 mm.; hand: 9.5 palm: 5.5, fingers, 4 mm. The shape of the male organs places this species in the sid^- genus Cambartis (see Ortmann, Pr. Amer. Philos. Soc. 44. 1905, p. 96, and Ann. Carnegie Mus. 3. 1905 p. 437). The hooks of the pereiopods and the subcylindrical chelae place it in the section of C. blandingi. The shape of the rostrum and of areola Dec, 1905.] Notes from Ohio State Herbarium. 403 indicate the group of C. alleni. Within the latter group it stands rather isolated with regard to the male organs, which show a rather primitive conformation, within exception of the distinct backward curve of the distal part. The shape of the rostrum is peculiar on account of the almost triangular outline (similar to C. advena), with hardly any traces of lateral angles in the place of marginal spines. The areola is exceptionally broad, broader than in any of the known species of this group. The most striking character (disregarding the male organs) is furnished by the chelae of the male, since the fingers are unusu- ally short, shorter than in any other species of the genus. Tluis the new species is well characterized by the shape of the rostrum, of the areola, chelipeds, and the m.ale sexual organs. Its distribution agrees with that of the alleni-group, in so far as it belongs of the lowlands of the coastal plain of the southern United States. It is the most western locality known for this group, being close to the Texas state-line (disregarding the Mexican C. iviegmanni). NOTES FROM THE OHIO ST.A.TE HERBARIUM, V. H. A. Gleason. A Revised List of the Hypericaceae of Ohio. The status of the family Hypericaceae m the catalogues of Ohio plants has been very varied. Dr. J. L. Riddell, in his Synopsis of the Flora of the Western States, listed nine species from Ohio, including among them Hypericum galioides Lam. and H. densiforum Pursh, species which in all probability do not occur within the State. They are both plants of the austro- riparian zone, ranging from New Jersey to Texas along the coastal plain, and inland to Tennessee. Dr. Riddell's Synopsis, as its name indicates was not restricted to Ohio, but included all of the Western States so far as he knew them, and he might possibly have seen specimens from Tennessee. A few other doubtful species have been added to our flora by some of the earlier authors, such as H. adpressum Bart., H. ellipticuni Hook., and Triadenum petiolatum (Walt.) Britton. From these sources they were admitted to the Catalogue of Ohio State Plants by W. A. Kellerman and Wm. C. Werner, and from that to the Fourth State Catalogue by W. A. Kellerman, the latest one pub- lished. Two of the seventeen listed by Kellerman and Werner do not appear in the Fourth Catalogue, H. densiflorum Pursh and H. galioides Lam. Two others were added, H. gymnanthimi Eng. and Gray and H. drummondii (Grev. and Hook.) T. and G., leaving the total number of species still at seventeen. 404 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. VI, No. 2, Under the present policy of the Department of Botany at Ohio State University only those species are included in the flora of the state which are actually represented by specimens in the State Herbarium. The necessity of such a regulation is obvious and requires no comment here. Five other species of the Fourth Catalogue are accordingly to be dropped, H. ellipti- cum Hook., H. adpressuni Bart., H. majus (Gray) Britton, H. canadense L., and Triadenum petiolatum (Walt.) Britton. There is no apparent reason why the first four of these should not occur in Ohio. Their geographical distribution, as given in the standard manuals, includes this State, they have been reported from adjoining States, and it is quite probable that future col- lecting, especially in the northern and northwestern parts of the State, will eventually result in their re-addition to the Ohio flora. Triadenum petiolatum, on the other hand, is not to be expected within the State. It is essentially a plant of the coastal plain swamps, extending from New Jersey to Louisiana and along the inland extension of the coastal plain to southern Illinois, where it grows in deep cypress swamps. Three additional species, however, are to be added to the list, H. horeale (Britton) Bickn., reported in 1904,*//. virgatwn Lam. and H. suh petiolatum Bickn., here reported for the first time from Ohio. Fifteen species of Hypericaceae are therefore actually represented in the State Herbarium, and this number will probably be raised in the future to nineteen. On this account the four species in question are included in the key. Both the flowers and fruit are necessary for the identification of most of the species, and in collecting care should be taken that the specimens show both. Except at the beginning and close of the blooming period a single plant will generally show both. Ripe capsules may easily be sectioned to show the number of cavities and the character of the partitions either dry or after soaking in hot water. Key to the Ohio Genera. 1. Sepals 4, in two very dissimilar pairs. Ascyrum. 1. Sepals 5, equal or nearly so. 2. 2. Receptacular glands none; flowers yellow. 3. 2. Three receptacular glands alternating with the stamen-clusters; flowers not yellow. Triadenum. 3. Leaves normal. Hypericum. 3. Leaves scale-like, appressed, flowers sessile. Sarothra. Ascyrum L. One species in the State. 1. Ascyrum multicaule Michx. Not Ascyrum hypericoides L. or Ascyrum crux-andreae L. as given in the standard manuals. These two names, which are synonyms, belong to a plant of the *Ohio Naturalist, 5:249, 1904. Dec, 1905.] Notes from Ohio State Herbarium. 405 southeastern States. Ascyrum is essentially a southeastern genus, and this species, which is its northernmost representative, is confined mainlv to the austro-appalachian and austro-riparian areas. In Ohio it grows in dry upland woods and hillsides in the southeastern part. Specimens are in the State Herbarium from Hocking, Lawrence, Fairfield, Gallia, Scioto, Hamilton and Jackson Counties. Hypericum L. 1. Capsules 5-celled, styles 5. 2. 1. Capsules 3-celled or 1-celled. 3. 2. Leaves on main stem 6-8 cm. long, flowers 3-4 cm. wide, capsules ovoid, 2 cm. long. 1. H. ascyron. 2. Leaves on main stem 2-3 cm. long, flowers 2 cm. wide, capsules narrowly ovoid, less than 1 cm. long. 2. H . kalmianum. 3. Stamens verv numerous. 4. 3. Stamens 5-12. 10. 4. Capsules 3-celled. 5. 4. Capsules 1-celled. 8. 4. Capsules incompletely 3-celled, stem 4-5 dm. high, flowers 1.5 cm. broad, short pedicelled, capsule 3-4 mm. long. (H. adpressum.) 5. Shrubs, capsules about 1 cm. long, leaves narrowly oblong or oblanceolate, usually revolute. 3. H. prohficimt. 5. Herbs, capsules 3-6 mm. long. 6. 6. Leaves oblong or linear-oblong, crowded, flowers about 2 cm. wide. 6. H. perforatum. 6. Leaves broader, elliptical to ovate, flowers about 1 cm. wide or a little larger. 7. 7. Leaves sessile, cordate, sepals acuminate. 7. H. maciilatum. 7. Leaves narrowed at the base, sepals obtuse. 8. H. siibpetiolatiim. 8. Styles separate, leaves oblong, sharply acute, ascending, 2-3 cm. long. 5. H. virgatum. 8. Styles united below into a beak, leaves obtuse or nearly so. 9. 9. Leaves narrowly oblong, 3-6 cm. long. 4. H . sphacrocarpum 9. Leaves elliptic or ovate, 1.5-2.5 cm. long. {H. elliptic uyn.) 10. Leaves lanceolate to ovate. 11. 10. Leaves linear. 14. 11. Capsule 8-10 mm. long. {H. ma jus.) 11. Capsule 6 mm. long or less. 12. 12. Leaves obtuse or rounded at apex. 13. 12. Leaves acute, ovate and cordate-clasping. 11. H. gytnnanthum. 13. Bracts subulate. • 9. H. mutilum. 13. Bracts broader, foliaceous. 10. H. boreale. 14. Leaves 3-nerved, spreading, capsule longer than the sepals. (H. canadense.) 14. Leaves 1-nerved, subulate, capsule about equalling the sepals. 12. H. drummondii. 1. H. ascyron L. In rich moist woods and river bottoms. Monroe, Holmes, Lucas, Lake, Cuyahoga, Erie, Summit, Frank- lin, and Richland Counties. A plant of generally northern range, in Ohio apparentl}^ with the widest distribution in the northern counties. 2. H. kalmianum L. Along or near the lake shore in Ottawa, Erie and Summit Counties. Occurs generally along all the Great Lakes. 4o6 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. VI, No. 2, 3. H. prolificum L. Champaign, Hocking, Defiance, Frank- lin, Hamilton, Tuscarawas, Montgomery, Carroll, Holmes, .jij.ackson, Coshocton, Adams, Gallia, Harrison, Portage, Stark, .Wyandot, Wayne, Scioto, and Fairfield Counties. Data are not at hand concerning its ecological habits but it probably prefers dry woods. 4. H. sphaerocarpuni Michx. Lake, Franklin, Montgomery and Clermont Counties. Should be found in dry woods in all the western counties. 5. H. vtrgatum Lam. A single specimen from Jackson County. This species is more characteristic of the coastal plain of the Atlantic from Delaware and New Jersey southward, but has been reported from a number of places inland. It is easily recognized by its leaf habit alone. 6. H. perforatum L. Naturalized from Europe in fields and along roadsides, Auglaize, Gallia, Ashtabula, Summit, Morrow, Highland, Lorain, Clinton, Stark, Union, Carroll, Wayne, Tus- carawas, Knox, Clark, Montgomery, Franklin, Richland, Noble, Guernsey, Ross, Harrison, Madison, Butler, Jeft'erson and Medina Counties. 7. H. niaculatum Walt. Scioto, Muskingum, Franklin, Adams, Wayne, and Logan Counties. 8. H. subpetiolatmn Bickn. Most abundant in moist, shaded woods. Stark, Highland, Lake, Richland, Erie, Shelby, Crawford, Summit, Carroll, Union, Auglaize, Clinton, Cuyahoga, Defiance, Hocking, Hamilton, Tuscarawas, Clermont, Gallia, Lorain, Huron, Morgan and Licking Counties. 9. H. mutilum L. In moist woods and along streams. Huron, Stark, Morgan, Jackson, Wayne, Brown, Franklin, Perry, Monroe, Scioto, Lake, Vinton, Clarke, Hamilton, Cuya- hoga, Fairfield, Hocking, Clermont and Auglaize Counties. 10. H. boreale (Britt.) Bickn. In peat bogs, Defiance and Geauga Counties. 11. H. gymnanthuni Engelm. and Gray. Erie County. 12. H. Driimmondii (Grev. and Hook.) T. and G. In dry soil and on rocks, Ashtabula and Hamilton Counties. Probably introduced in the former. S.\ROTHRA L. A monotypic genus. 1. 5. gentianoides L. In sand and on dry rocks, Erie, Gallia and Scioto Counties. Probably occurs elsewhere along the lake shore. Triadenum Raf. One species in the State. 1. T. virginicum (L. ) Raf. In peat bogs and swamps in the northern half of the State. Wayne, Erie, Geauga, Licking, Cuyahoga and Huron Counties. Dec, 1905.] Chelanops oblongus. 407 HABITS AND DISTRIBUTION OF THE PSEUDOSCORPION- IDAE, PRINCIPALLY CHELANOPS OBLONGUS, SAY.* E. W. Berger, Ph. D. (J. H. U.)- The observations that prompted the writing of this paper were made mainly in Jamaica, W. I., at intervals between the 14th of June and the middle of August, 1897, while the writer was a member of the Marine Biological Laboratory of the Johns Hopkins University, located for that summer at Port Antonio. Soon after our arrival an abundance of material, with most of the females bearing egg and brood pouches, was discovered upon the Bogg Estate, just to the west of the above named town. The majoritv of the specimens collected (several hundred in all) belong to a single species, Chelanops oblongus. Ten specimens only of another, a smaller, more active species, but with larger mandibles (chelicerae) and with a more rectangular abdomen, were found in the same locality living together with the previous species. This smaller species is Chthonius pennsylvanicus, Hagen. I believe it proper to add here, that I was turned aside from this to other work soon after my return from Jamaica, and that before I had identified these species. Later, when 1 desired to identify them I had no facilities, and in 1900 sent specimens to the Smithsonian Institution. These were promptly identified for me by Mr. Nathan Banks, Honorary Curator of the Section of Arachnida, as the species above named. I have only recently had the opportunity to identify them for myself at the Ohio State University, using Mr. Bank's key (III). The Pseudoscorpionidae (Chernetidae) constitute an order in the Class Arachnoidea, or spider-like animals, and some species are very small. The specimens in L. Balsan's list (I) range from 1.20 to 7.10 mm. in length. The C. oblongus from Jamaica measures 3.33 to 4.00 mm. ; some specimens collected by Profes- sor Jas. S. Hine at Georgesville, Ohio, measure only 2.00 mm., but are evidently not fully matured. The males are slightly smaller than the females. C. pennsylvanicus measures 1.90 mm. only. They are called Pseudoscorpions because of their resemblance to real scorpions, except in size and in the absence of the post-abdomen and a poison sting. Many species are blind, including C. oblongus; C. pennsylvanicus has four small eyes. Distribution. — I was surprised to find that both the species collected in Jamaica should occur quite throughout the eastern U. S. Mr. Banks names the following localities for C. oblongus: Ithaca, N. Y., Washington, D. C, Brazos Co., Texas, Citrus Co., * Contributions from the Department of Zoology of the Ohio State University, No. 23. 4o8 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. VI, No. 2, Fla., Sand Point, Fla., Retreat, N. C, Fredericksburg, Va., and Detroit, Mich. (To this Ust can now be added Port Antonio, Jamaica, and Georgesville, Ohio.) ; for C. pemisylvanicus, Pough- kepsie, N. Y., and Lake Poinsett, Fla. I read over carefully the list named by Mr. Banks in his paper (III) above quoted, for the purpose of noting the distribution north and south, and east and west. I have concluded from this that there are distinct eastern and western species, but probably only a few distinct northern and southern species. Thus Pacific Coast species are reported no farther east than Utah, Montana and Wyoming, while eastern species are reported no farther west than Texas, Kentucky, and Michigan. Obisiuni Brunnerium, Hagen, common in the east, is reported from Utah, but Mr. Banks seems to have some doubt in this case that the Utah species is the same. Chelijer can- croides, Linn., Faun. Suec, is of course reported from the Pacific Coast and perhaps occurs over the whole U.S., and if not now, will very likely soon occur throughout the entire world. Two or three species are reported only from Texas and Colorado. Eastern and Pacific Coast species, on the other hand, generally have a wide north and south distribution. Thus among other eastern species named by Mr. Banks, Chelijer hiseriatum, Bks., reported only from Lake Poinsett, Fla., was found by myself under a neglected carpet infested with buffalo moths, at Berea, Ohio, in 1901. The two species collected in Jamaica also illus- trate this far north and south distribution nicely, extending even to within the tropics. This wide north and south distribution of the species of pseudoscorpions versus their rather limited east and west distri- bution, I believe is associated with the migration of insects or birds. Pseudoscorpions have, however, to my knowledge, never been found upon birds, so that nothing definite can be stated in this respect. On the other hand, they are known to cling to insects (chiefly flies and beetles) and arachnids (see Associations with Insects) and to be transported from place to place by these. Certain insects are known to migrate for hundreds of miles. Thus a moth, the Black Witch, Erebus odora, is supposed to migrate from the West Indies and Mexico to the U. S., while the Monarch, Anosia plexippus, is believed to migrate south in fall and north in Spring. No doubt there are other migratory insects, so that the distribution of pseu- doscorpions will, I believe, sometime find its explanation in this direction. There being nothing like a complete list of pseudoscoripons in existence, it is evident that these speculations are somewhat tentative. I tried to gain some idea of the distribution in South America bv comparing the i)apers of Ellingsen (VIII), Balsan (I) and Banks (III). I found no species mentioned that are common to Dec, 1905.] Chelanops oblongus. 409 Ohio Naturalist. Plate XXVIII. E. W. Berger, Del, Chelanops oblongus, female. W- 4IO , The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. VI, No. 2, both North and South America. Two species, Chelifer canes- triniim, BaL, and Chelifer longichelifer occur both in Ecuador (Guayaquil) and in Venezuela, i. e., to the west and east of the Andes. Two other species from Venezuela occur in Paraguay and Uruguay. Hagen in one of his papers (IX) mentions Chelifer americanus occurring in Venezuela and South Brazil. Of the few species noted from Peru and Chili, west of the Andes, none are reported from the east. The evidence from South America, while insufficient, I believe nevertheless suggests a distribution similar to that in North America. The distribution of the order Pseudoscorpionidae is, of course, worldwide: North America, South America, Europe, Asia, Africa, Australia, Madagascar, Sumatra and New Celebes, each having representatives reported. Habitats. — I collected almost all my specimens from under the loose bark of fiat-lying trees. A few were found in banana plant rubbish (dried leaves, pieces of stems, etc.) and in dead pines (Pine here refers to a relative of the pinaepple that grows as an aerophyte upon trees in the tropics.) While I could not state that pseudoscorpions are social in their habits, I always felt that when I found one, others were not far away, and that the}' were scattered in groups rather than singly. It is also interesting to note that the places of occurrence of these species in Jamaica were always damp or even wet: frequently so wet that I could press water from the bark and wood with my fingers. I never found them in dry places, and when I kept some in cap- tivity under small pieces of bark in glass jars, I found that they died and dried up if the bark was not kept quite moist and the jars covered. By taking proper precaution, however, to provide moisture, several colonies were kept alive for about ten months. In one instance I prepared a roll of bark about a core of decayed wood and set it one end in a glass jar. This worked very well, the animals living between the layers of the bark and wood. In this jar and' others some females even pro- duced eggs, and some young were hatched. To keep water from condensing upon the sides of the glass, I lined the jars with filter juiper. Not all preudoscorpions, however, require such wet con- ditions; thus Chelifer biseriatum already referred to, and Chelifer cancroides, the book scorpion, both live in very dry ])laces in houses. Other localities where these little creatures find their abode are: upon the leaves of trees (palmetto), between the crevices of rocks, under rocks, driftwood and leaves in the woods. Ohisium maritimuni, Leach, and Chclanops iristes, Bks., live under stones between tide marks: the former on the Isle of Man and other British Isles, the latter on Long Island, N. Y. Immes, who reports the former species, suggests that it retains sufficient air in its tracheae to keep it alive during high tide. Dec, 1905.] Chelanops oblongus. 4*1 These two species represent the extreme in wetness to which members of the order have become accommodated. To this hst of habitats must be added parisitism and com- mensahsm, habits which the order has developed in connection with other insects. Association with Ixsects, Food. — Pseudoscorpions evi- dently associate themselves with insects and a few arachnids in three ways: as travelers, parasites and commensalists. As travelers they make use of insects and other arachnids by hold- ing fast with the chelae of their pedipalps to the legs of flies, bedbugs, phalangids (harvestmen), tipulids (craneflies), etc., or by concealing themselves under the elytra of the larger beetles, Alaus oculatus, and others. It appears that in the tropics they are more often reported upon beetles, while in the north more frequently upon fhes and the other insects named. As supposed parasites they occur mainly upon beetles. The cases of Chernetidae on record, occurring under the elytra and wings of beetles where the body is softest, seems to make this belief probable. I see no reason why it should not be easy enough for a pseudoscorpion to penetrate the softer parts of a beetle with its sharp mandibles. In commensalism the species of insects with which they are associated are prboably the same as in parasitism. The truth is, it would be quite a difficult matter to name either the species of insects or of pseudoscorpions that belong strictly to any one of these three groups. Since pseudoscorpions are carnivorous, sucking the juices from smaller insects, mites, etc., it appears not at all improbable that they should find their prey under the wings of a beetle, and stay there until the supply is exhausted. I, myself, have found neither C. oblongus nor C. pennsyl- vanicus upon other insects, but Hagen (IX) reports it {Ch. alius, Leidy) under the elytra of the beetle Alaus oculatus. He further states that blind Chernes species travel mainly upon beetles, and mentions Chelijer americanus, De Geer, on Acanthocinus longimanus in Venezuela and South Brazil; another in Brazil on Passalus; and one in Melbourne (together with a tick) upon Passalus politus; all occur under the elytra. A special few, he says, travel fastened to flies, as Ch. Sanhorni in Mass. and Ch. Loewii in Panama. Hagen evidently favors the transport theory and believes that certain species limit themselves to certain species of flies, beetles or other insects. Moniez and Wagner also favor the transport theory. Other writers favor either parasitism or commensalism. Thus Leydig in discussing the occurrence of a pseudoscorpion under the wings of a Brazilian beetle, emphasizes the fact that they are located under the wings where the abdomen is most vulnerable, and believes in parasitism. Ihering believes in com- 4t2 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. VI, No. 5, mensalism, and mentions species of Pyrophorous between which and the pseudoscorpion he thinks a definite relation has been established; but he admits that the species upon leaves are probably the same as upon the beetles. As will be seen in the following topic pseudoscorpions evi- dently do attack and may cause the death of flies much larger than themselves. It occurs to me that this instinct for robbery is the starting point that lead to the habit of holding fast to insects for travel, to parasitism and to commensalism, in what- ever degree these exist as a habit. It is perhaps natural for a pseudoscorpion to lay hold of anything alive that comes within its reach. I have distinct recollections of teasing specimens with a needle or with a splinter, and that the}^ would lay hold of these objects with their chelae. If, then, the attacked insect is strong enough to walk or fly away, and the pseudoscorpion does not kill it, he becomes a passenger; if he finds natural secretions or succeeds in wounding his host, he is a parasite; if he finds other insects or mites that serve his wants, he is simply a com- mensalist. It is thus quite easy to understand how the three conditions of travel, parasitism and commensalism may have developed as a habit, if indeed the}' are not accidents, for pseudoscorpions can live very well without hosts. Food, Cannibalism. — As I have stated before, the food of pseudoscorpions is the juices of insects, mites, etc., usually smaller than themselves. I have seen specimens holding some smaller insect either by means of the chelae of the pedipalps or by means of the chelicerae. It is generally known that they feed upon psocids (corrodentia) and Hagen mentions Atropus pulsatorius, the death watch, as their probable food. On the other hand, I have found them {Chelijer biseriatum) associated with buffalo moths and believe that they were there because the moths were abundant and good feeding. The following observations by Bachhausen are important and interesting. Thus Prof. C. Berg reports (V) that I3achhausen in South America found a pseudoscorpion attached to the leg of a blow-fly and hanging free. He noticed after several hours that the legs of the fly became stift". The next morning the fly was dead and the pseudoscorpion sucked full under some scraps of paper. Bachhausen next hungered a number upon moss under a glass and then gave them some small flies. The pseudoscor- pions soon appeared from concealment and began to attach themselves to the legs of the flies by one pedipalp. When two happened to get the same fly one or the other soon let go in order to get a victim of its own. The legs of the flies soon become stiffened and when the flies died they dragged them into con- cealment. A tabanus is reported as dying much slower than the other flies. On the other hand, Muehlhausen does not find that Dec, 1905.] Chelanops oblongus. 413 the fly's leg was stiffened by a Chelifer cancroides (the book scorpion), which held fast for fifty-six hours, or until it was drowned in a drop of milk. Nor did the microscope show any evidence of injury to the fly's leg. It occurs to me, however, that C. cancroides is one of the smaller species and consequently was not able to injure the fly's leg as an individual of a larger species could have done. Cannibalism. — I observed several times, while collecting specimens, that large individuals were holding smaller ones in their chelae. I also observed the same thing upon some spec- imens kept in the jars (see Captivity). Then, again, the speci- mens in the jars w^ere continually on the decrease. From these several observations I am led to believe that Chelanops oblongus and other pseudoscorpions are cannibalistic. On the other hand, the immature of C. oblongus and other pseudoscorpions build small nests in which they live (or rather become torpid) during their moulting periods and in which they remain until their cuticle has hardened (see Breeding). This evidently indicates danger from enemies and probably from their own kin. I believe rather more from their own kin than from other enemies, since the places where pseudoscorpions live are small and they could easily crawl into some crevice where a larger enemy could not reach them. I furthermore found but few insects and other animals under the bark of sufficient size to be of much danger. These consideraitons strengthen my belief in the probability of cannibalism. I know of no writer who has made similar observations. Captivity. — In the three jars used for confining live speci- mens I kept from thirty to forty for nearly ten months. I can perhaps best give the history of these by quoting the brief notes verbatim. Jar A. Sept. 3d. — All seem contented. Found one speci- men carrying a smaller one in his jaws. Is this cannibalism? Found one with a small bunch of yellow eggs. Sept. 30th. — I find fewer specimens, but all appear happy. There are none with eggs. There is a plenty of other little insects and mites in all the jars ; also some small earthworms. Oct. 21st. — There are now only five specimens and none with eggs. Jar B. Sept. 4th. — This jar had three specimens with bunches of yellow eggs, and other specimens with and without small eggs. I can find nothing of those with eggs today. Found small one building a casting nest. No evidence of eggs on any, but I had no lens with which to examine them. Bunches of eggs may be very small at first, quite colorless and difficult to see without a lens or without turning the animals over. 414 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. VI, No. 2, Sept. 30th. — I found none with eggs and fewer specimens. What has become of them? Some doubtless lost their life by drowning in drops of water precipitated upon the glass, but this does not account for all missing. Oct. 20th. — Found two dead and one small one alive. Found one in moulting nest preparing to cast. Jar C* Sept. 7th. — Bark arranged in concentric layers and populated with adults. All seem contented. Found eight specimens with yellow bunches of eggs. One encased in moult- ing nest. One with small one in jaws (cannibalism?) No small ones were put into this jar nor any with eggs. Sept. 30th. — Looked over jar C where previously there were adults with eggs, and now I find none. The number of adults is fewer. What has become of them? Do they eat each other and also the females with eggs? Have not noticed any undue amount of empty skins, did however observe remnants of pedipalps, etc., at the bottom of the jar. Oct. 21st. — There are now eight specimens living and four found dead. None with eggs. One small one in moulting nest preparing to cast, found Oct. 20th, casted Oct. 23d, but at eleven a. m. still in the nest. Two days later "baby" is out of its nest and under bark. June 3d, 1898. — All specimens are dead in all the jars. Some shells and claws of them only can be found. Some little white hexapods, also some black ones, and some small mites are living in the jars. Breeding, Nests, Moulting. — The genital opening is located ventrally between the second and third abdominal seg- ments, and it is here that the female carries her eggs in a small whitish pouch. The young are hatched within this pouch and remain there until ready to shift for themselves, being nourished in the mean time by a fluid secretion from the mother. This secretion is produced either by the oviduct or by some other glandular structure within the genital opening. The pouches enlarge as the young increase in size, until they become quite cumbersome for the mother to carry. I have counted twenty- four eggs in a pouch. Metchnikoff says about fifty and that they are one-tenth of a millimetre in diameter. Barrois says that he found about thirty. It is generally understood that the young are nourished in the pouch. Moulting Nests. — I shall next describe more fully the moult- ing or casting nests. These are composed of a wall of small fragments of wood and bark that completely incloses a circular or oval space three to four millimetres in diameter. One of these little nests extends from the wood of the tree to the bark, and is lined with silk. When a young specimen is ready to shed its skin it builds one of these nests, suspends itself Dec, 1905.] Chelanops oblongus. 415 within, supported by several fibres of silk which cross and recross the enclosed space, becomes torpid and moults in two or three davs. It then remains in its nest for one or two days longer, or until its cuticle hardens, when it is ready to break through the wall of its little prison. (See notes Jar C above; also figure.) Some writers convey the idea that these nests are built by the mother for the entire brood after they leave the pouch, and that they remain there until sufficiently hardened. Judging by mv own observations this is not the case. I have never found l)ut a single specimen in a nest of this kind, and that always an Fig. I. Moulting Nest of Chelanops oblongus. immature one. (I collected and observed not less than two dozen such nests.) Furthermore, I usually found the empty skin in the nest and sometimes the skin and the animal, in fact I all but saw them in the act of moulting. (See notes under Jar C.) As I have never found an adult, with or without eggs, in a nest, I think there can be no doubt that the casting or moulting nests are built by single immature individuals for a safe retreat during moulting and not by the parent for the entire brood. Mr. Banks has this statement in his paper (III) which corresponds exactly with my observations: "Many were young and had formed little cases of silk and earth in which to pass the moulting period." This was reported by Mr. Hubbard for Garypiis hicornis, Bks., which lives between the laminae of rocks at Specimen Ridge, Yellow Stone National Park. 41 6 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. VI, No. 2, The following observations by J. Barrois (IV) upon a clielifer living in the temperate zone are interesting, and show that females may build nests, but evidently for themselves and not for the brood. This chelifer was found in small closed nests under rocks. Only the females built the nests. The males hid as best they could and were smaller and fewer than the females. Between October and February the occupants were plump with swollen abdomens. By the end of April or May the nests were empty or contained only an emaciated female. The eggs were not laid before January, but after that they were found in a packet adhering to the vulva, with the cavity of the packet in free communication with the oviduct, evidently a nutritive adaptation. Here we see how the female uses a nest for another purpose. In the tropics where my observations were made, such an adaptation would hardly be necessary and I do not think that it exists. Moulting. — I made no observation indicating the number of times pseudoscorpions moult. That they moult after becoming sexually mature is probable from the fact that the normal gen- ital openings appear when they are about three-fourths grown and that they produce eggs at that stage. Smaller animals show no signs of genital openings. Then again, a case of regen- eration of a pedipalp (descr. below) indicates that mature ani- mals probably moult even when apparently full grown. In arthropods generally the enlargement of a regenerating organ takes place at moulting time, in fact regeneration presupposes moulting, and if the same rule holds true for pseudoscorpions, it suggests that older specimens may moult. (See, however, Moulting Nests.) The manner of moulting is as follows: The dorsal skin of the cephalothorax splits at the anterior and lateral margins, remaining hinged posteriorly. The animal then extricates it- self through this opening. This is the situation indicated by the exuviae examined, in which this skin exists as a hinged lid. Regeneration. — I found a few specimens that had lost one to several segments of the pedipalps, and one specimen with a large (normal) pedipalp and a small one of about half the nor- mal size. The smaller pedipalp was of lighter color and thin, and in every way suggested a case of regeneration similar to that found in crabs. Body Movements, Light or Heat. — A pseudoscorpion can retract one or both of its chelicerae and move them in any direction. The pedipalps can be moved in any direction and the trochanter and femur folded back almost against the sides of the body, the tibia and the chelae, or hand, extending for- ward. It cleans the chelae of its pedipalps with its chelicerae, or mandibles, using them either singly or as a pair. The legs are used in pairs when walking, and those of each side constitute Dec, 1905,] Chelanops oblongus. 4^7 two pairs, an anterior and a posterior pair. When at rest the two anterior pairs extend forward and the two posterior pairs backward from a right angle with the body. When walking it uses its four pairs of legs quite as any four-footed animal uses its legs. When disturbed it contracts its abdomen, the latter thus becoming shorter and thicker. I focused the direct sunlight from a small engraver's lens ;upon the desk, the specimen being under a watch glass. It appears that in a few instances the animal took note of the focus and went around it. It seems to have become conscious of the focus by reaching into it with its pedipalps. At other times it walked right through the focus without any concern whatever. Once I directed the focus upon the cephalothorax for some little time, when all at once it seemed to feel something, probably the heat of the focus, and it hurried away apparently discomforted. No eyes could be discovered, and the above experiments, I believe, simply indicate that the animal felt the heat of the focus. With a lens I could make out in many instances light circular disks near the anterior lateral margins of the cephalothorax. These were very suggestive of the so-called €ye spots of the eyed elaters. Color. — The color of the adult is light brown, with the pedipalps, the dorsal part of the cephalothorax and the dorsal plates of a darker shade. In newly moulted specimens the appendages are of a light slate color, sometimes of a green or blue cast, or cream color, while the body is of a uniform yellow- ish brown or cream color, with the dorsal plates not well marked off. . Economic Value. — To what extent these little animals serve any useful purpose in the destruction of insect pests, is not well known and difficult to determine. But, since they are carniv- orous, we may imagine that they destroy many small insects, larvae and mites that would otherwise be harmful; and if Bach- hausen's observations are correct, many flies, and perhaps other insects larger than themselves The book scorpion no doubt serves a useful purpose in keeping down the number of book-lice, and to what extent this is done might be a subject for investiga- tion. On the other hand a more complete study of the group may show us more clearly its economic value. The writer desires to express his sincere appreciation to Pro- fessor Osborn for his interest m.anifested in this paper and for the publication of the same as a University Bulletin. Biological Hall, Ohio State University, November 24, 1905. LITERATURE. I. Balsan, Prof. Luigi. 1891. Vovage de M. E. Simon au Venezuela, Arachnides, Chernetes. (fin) Ann. Soc. Ent. France. (Did not see first seventeen pages.) 4i8 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. VI, No. 2» II. Banks, Nathan. 1891. Notes on N. A. Chernetidae. Canad. Entom., Vol. 22, No. 8, Vol. 23, No. 8, Vol. 25, No. 3. III." Banks, Nathan. 1895. Notes on the Pseudoscorpion- idae. ^ Journ. N. Y. Entom. Soc, Vol. 3. IV. t, Barrois, J. 1896. Memoire sur le developpement des Chelifer. t Revue Suisse. Z. Tome 3. V. Berg, Prof. C. 1893. Pseudoscorpioniden kniffe, Zool. Anz. XVI. VI. Bouvier, E. L. 1896. Sur le ponte et le developpement dun Preudoscorpionide, le Carypus Saxicola, Waterhouse. Bull. Soc. Entom. France. No. 13. Rect. ibid. No. 15. (Should read Rect. first.) VII. Croneberg, A. 1888. Beitrag Ztir Kenntniss des Baues der Pseudoscorpione. Bull, de la Societe Imperiale des Naturalistes de Moscow. No. 3. VIII. Ellingsen, Edv. 1905. On some Preudoscorpions from S. i\m. in the Collect, of Prof. Dr. F. Silvestri. Zool. Anz. Bd. XXIX. Nr. 10. IX. Hagen, H. 1879. Hoehlen-Chelifer in Nort-America. Zool Anz. t. II. X. Hagen, H. 1867. Mode of Locomotion in Chelifer and Other Pseudoscorpions. Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. XV, Apr. 23, 1873. XI. Hickson, S. J. 1893. Notes on The Parasitism of of Chelifers on Beetles. Zool. Anz. 16 Jahr. XII. Ihering, H. von 1893. Zum Commensalismus der Pseudoscorpione. Zool. Anz. XVI. XIII. Immes, A. D. 1904. Marine Pseudoscorpion from the Isle of Man. Ann. Nat. Hist. XIV. One plate, one Fig. XIV. Ley dig, F. 1893. Zum Parasitismus der Pseudo- scorpione. Zool. Anz. XVI. XV. Moniez, R. 1892. A propos des publications recentes sur le faux parasitismus des Chernetides sur differentes Arthro- podes. Revue Biol. Lille. 6 Annee. XVI. Muhlhausan, Hess W. 1894. Ueber Pseudoscor- pioniden als Raeuber. Zool. Anz. 17. XVII. Wagner, Franz, von. 1892. Chernes Hanii (Ch. cuiricoides). Zool. Anz. 15. DESCRIPTIOX OF FIGURES. Plate XXVIII. — Chelanops ohlongus, female. The long hairs upon the chelae, the chelicerae, the cephalothorax, the dorsal scutae and at the posterior end of the abdomen are exact copies of nature. The second visible segment figured on the legs is not movable upon the third segment and is ])roperly speaking not a joint. Dec, 1905.] Key to the Ohio Dogwoods. 419 Fig. 1. — Small immature C. ohlongus in a moulting nest. Notice lining of silk at X ; this was not sketched over the entire inside of the nest as it would have obscured the fibres that sup- port the animal. Hairs on ventral scutae are as in nature. Note that one leg lacks a segment ; this is as in nature. Sketched from living animal (torpid) in the nest. While drawing I noted two droplets of liquid accumulate near a joint and spread over the surface. KEY TO THE OHIO DOGWOODS IN THE WINTER CONDITION John H. Schaffner. Cornus L. Shrubs or trees with opposite, whorled, or some- times alternate leaf scars; twigs green, red, brown, or grav, glabrous or pubescent; terminal bud present with 2 acuminate outer scales; axillary buds single, minute or well developed; leaf scars narrow, u-shaped, visually connected by a line or ridge, the uppermost notched; bundle scars 3, stipular scars none; pith small, solid, cylindrical; fruiting peduncle self-pruned, producing distinct terminal scars. 1. Leaf scars opposite; shrubs or trees. 2. 1. Leaf scars alternate; twigs green or yellowish -green, glabrous; inter- nodes very unequal, axillary buds usually minute; small trees or erect shrubs. C. altcrnifoba L. Blue Dogwood. L Low geophilous shrubs with small creeping rhizomes and herbaceous aerial stems, 4-12 in. high, with a whorl of leaves at the summit. C. canadensis L. Dwarf Dogwood. 2. Axillary buds visually minute and undeveloped except at the base of the peduncle which is self-pruned ; twigs green or reddish-green, glabroiis or nearly so; a small tree with rough, reticulate bark; flowers in involucrate heads which are prominently developed in winter. C. florida L. Flowering Dog\vood. 2. Axillary buds normally well developed and prominent; typical shrubs, or if tree-like very pubescent; flowers cymose and not involucrate. 3. 3. Twigs green or greenish, glabrous or nearly so, warty dotted; a com- pact shrub with upright, grayish stem. C. circmata L'Her. Roundleaf Dogwood. 3. Twigs bright red or red-purple, glabrous or nearly so; a spreading shrub rooting freely and multiplying by stolons; usuallv in wet places. C. stolonifcr ilx. Red-osier Dogwood. 3. Twigs pubescent, rarely glabrate when old, greenish or reddish brown or gray. 4. 4. Twigs silky downy, usually ptirplish; fruit blue; a shrub with spread- ing branches growing in wet soil. C. amomnni Mill. Silky Dogwood. 4. Twigs very rough pubescent, brownish or reddish-brown; fruit white; erect or tree-like shrubs in river bottoms and moist or dry soil. C. aspcrifolia Mx. Roughleaf Dogwood. 4. Twigs glabrate, with scattered hairs, gray, rather slender; fruit white; a much branched shrub. C. candidissima Marsh. Panicled Dogwood. 420 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. VI, No. 2, FREE-FLOATING PLANTS OF OHIO. Mabel Schaffxer. In general all hydrophytes may be classed into two groups, those rooted in the soil and those which are free. The rooted plants are either completely submerged or they may have part of the body above and part below the surface of the water. Among the latter type of plants are numerous species with only the leaf blades floating on the surface, as Potamogeton natans and Castalia odorata. The non-rooted vegetation consists (1) of microscopic, free-floating and free-swimming Thallophytes and (2) of higher plants adapted to a free-floating condition, amons: which must also be included rooted forms accidentlv torn from their anchorage and the specially developed propagative buds known as hibernacula. The microscopic plants together with the Protozoa and other low animal forms make up the plankton, while the second type of societies has been called the derived or secondary phyto-plankton. The typical members of the secondary plankton are passive, free-floating plants which as appears from their general structure and life cycle were evidently derived from rooted ancestors. In free-floating plants like the duckweeds, which are among the most highly specialized forms, the leaves are entirely absent and the stem is a flattened, disc-like body, or in a few species it is nearly spherical. The plants are buoyed up on the surface of the water by means of air cavities developed either in the body of the stem or in the leaves. The most striking of these adaptations is a spongy enlargement of the petiole as in the water hyacinth. The air reservoirs usually consist of spongy tissue with large intercellular spaces. Most floating plants have a suitable counterpoise to prevent the plant from being turned upside down by ripples and waves. In AzoUa and most of the duckweeds the counterpoise consists of one or more dangling roots. In Salvinia dissected leaves looking much like hanging roots act as counterpoises. In Ricciocarpus the counterpoise consists of numerous slender scales. There are various adaptations to afford protection against wetting. The larger duckweeds have a very smooth and glisten- ing surface from which water rolls in the spheroidal form. Lemna trisulca which is usually submerged does not have the power of shedding water. In Salvinia curious, tufted hairs, the tips of which spread out in three or four branches, are developed on the upper surface. When the plant is overturned air is imprisoned bv these tufted hairs and it is immediately turned right side up. Surface floating plants are exposed to intense light. Some Dec, 1905.] Free-floating Plants of Ohio. 421 species like Azolla develop anthocyan while others like Salvinia are protected by hairs. In some, as in Lemna trisulca the chlorophyll granules shift their position with the changes in the intensity of the light. In diffused light the granules lie against the horizontal walls, but if strong light strikes the surface perpendicularly they are transferred to the vertical walls. Vegetative propagation is usually effected with great rapidity by the branching and budding of the stem and the separation of these branches. The duckweeds and other free-floating plants frequently cover great areas very closely and largely prevent the formation of waves when one throws a stone into the water. In the south the water hyacinth (Piaropus crassipes (Mart.) Britt.) covers large areas of rivers and lakes, causing much inconvenience to navigation. Among the Ohio plants which may be found floating free in the water though normally attached may be mentioned the fol- lowing: Hottonia inflata Ell., Philotria canadensis (Mx.) Britt., Ceratophyllum demersiim L., Myriophyllum sp.. Utricularia sp., and Potamogeton sp. Utricularia has little bladders which not only assist in float- ing the plant but act as traps for capturing small organisms which are digested for food. The typical, free-floating plants which are found in the secondary plankton of Ohio are as follows: LIVERWORTS. Riccia fluitans L. Ricciocarpus natans (L.) Corda. WATER FERNS. Salvinia natans (L.) Hoffm. Azolla caroliniana Willd. MONOCOTYLS. Spirodela polyrhiza (L.) Schl. Lemna trisulca L. Lemna cyclostasa (Ell.) Chev. Lemna minor L. Wolffia Columbiana Karst. Wolffia punctata Griseb. 4 22 The Ohio Naturalist [Vol. VI, No. 2, MEETING OF THE BIOLOGICAL CLUB. Orton Hall, June 5, 1905. The club was called to order by President Hine. The min- utes of the previous meeting were read and approved. Mr. York, chairman of the committee to nominate the editors of the Naturalist for the coming year made the following report: Editor-in-chief, J. H. Schaffner. Business manager, J. S. Hine. Associate Editors: F. L. Landacre, Zoologv; J. E. Hyde, Geologv; Z. P. Metcalf, Ornithologv; R. F. Griggs, Botanv; W. C. Mills, Archeology; J. N. Frank,' Ecology. On the motion of Prof. Osborn the report was adopted. The program of the evening consisted of reports of theses by members in the biological departments of the Universitv. Miss L. C. Riddle reported the second part of her thesis which dealt with the "Development of the Embryo-sac and Embrvo of Batrachium longirostris." Mr. F. M. Surface reported his thesis on "The Scent Glands of Hemiptera Heteroptera with a special reference to the Nymph of Avasa tristis." He also gave a report on the embryology of Sanguinaria canadensis. Mr. H. H. York had finished and reported his thesis the previous year, and therefore gave an account of his more recent observations on Myriophylluin. Mr. J. F. Clevenger gave a review of his thesis on "The North American Species of Phyllachora." Mr. E. C. Cotton reported his investigations on "The Insects of the Black Locust." Miss Opal I. Tillman gave a summary of her thesis on the "Life History of the Cucumber Plant with Notes on the Economic Value of the Cucurbitaceae. Mr. L. M. Smith reported his thesis on "The Insects Injurious to Stone Fruits." He dealt especially with the peach borer. Mr. R. C. Young was elected to membership. The club then adjourned mitil the opening of the fall term. Frank M. Surface, Sec'y. Date of Publication of December Number, December 18, 1905. The Ohio T\[^aturalist, PUBLISHED BY The Biological Club of the Ohio State Uni'versity, Volume VI. JANUARY, 1906. No. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Tillman— The Embryo Sac and Embryo of Cucumis sativus 423 Hubbard— Physiography and Geography— Their Relations, Differences and Essential Fields 431 Nelson— A Note on the Occurrence of Sex Organs in Aelosoma 435 BuEGESs— A Preliminary Report on the Mosquitoes of Ohio 438 Kellerman. YiiRK AND Glea SON— Annual Report on the State Herbarium for the Years 1903, 1904, and 190i 441 DUKY— How to Collect Stylopidae 443 Sterki— Some Notes on Martynia 444 Miller— Classification and Mapping of the Lower Ordovician in Kentucky 447 HiLLiG — A New Case o f Mutation 448 Sterki — A Few General Notes and Remarks with Respect to the Land and Fresh Water Mollusca 449 Schaffner — Additional Observations on Self-pruning 450 Metcalf— Meetings of the Biological Club , 451 THE EMBRYO SAC AND EMBRYO OF CUCUMIS SATIVUS.* Opal I. Tillman. Before the present investigation was begun practically no detailed morphological work had been reported on the Cucurbi- taceae and as there has been much doubt concerning the sys- tematic position and relationship of the plants constituting this family it seemed to offer an interesting and profitable field for research. Cucumis sativus was taken by the writer for special investi- gation as a representative of the group but before the results of the work could be published Kirkwood reported (3.) the results of his work on "The Comparative Embryology of the Cucurbi- taceae." In this paper he considers seventeen species, but not Cucumis sativus. Longo has worked on the behavior of the pollen tube (1.) and in his more recent paper (2.) he reports an interesting condition of the pollen tube in Cucurbita pepo which is practically the same as occurs in Cucumis sativus. Material for study was collected during the summer and fall, killed in chromo-acetic acid, passed through successive grades of alcohol and preserved in 70%. Serial sections were cut 10-12 mic. thick, 10 mic. being the usual thickness. The stains used ^ * Contributions from the Botanical Laboratory of the Ohio State University, XXII. 424 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. VI, No. 3, were Anilin Safranin and Gentian Violet, Heidenhain's Iron- Alum-Haematoxylin, and Delafield's Haematoxvlin, the latter perhaps giving the best results. Care had to be taken with it and the Tron-Alum-Hacmatoxylin as the embrvo sacs and em- bryos stained so deeply that it was difficult to make out the details unless a large part of the stain was removed. The stages just after fertilization were quite difficult to observe as the pollen tube discharges a quantity of material which stains very deeplv and obscures the embryo sac structures. Orientation for sectioning was not difficult as the ovularv when cut crosswise gives longitudinal sections of a number of ovules. For the older stages only a portion of the ovularv could be sectioned on account of its size. The cross section of the very young ovulary shows the placentae with minute protuberances which represent the incip- ient ovules (Fig. 1). The carpel has three placentae, and the ovtiles are delveoped in six rows which are usually double, but this is somewhat irregular. The tip of the ovule remains straight for only a short time after the appearance of the arche- sporial cell (Fig. 6). The cells along the outer margin begin to divide more rapidly than those of the inner side. This unequal growth causes the ovule to turn, and this process continues until the micropyle is brought close to the funiculus. Before the megasporocyte has divided and before the integuments have grown over the nucellus the ovule has curved half the distance, and the normal anatropous condition is practically attained w^hen the ovule has reached the megaspore stage (Fig. 5). At this time the characteristic beak which develops at the tip of the nucellus is already becoming prominent. The integuments lengthen greatly forming a long narrow micropyle into which the neck-like process of the flask-shaped nucellus projects, even to the tip of the integuments. The archesporium is as usual a single hypodermal cell that terminates the axial row of the nucellus. It can easily be dis- tinguished from the surrounding cells by its greater size and_ deeper color due to the denser protoplasmic contents (Fig. 6).' By a transverse division the archesporial cell gives rise to two cells, the megasporocyte and primary parietal cell (Fig. 7). The latter continues to divide by both periclinal and anticlinal walls thus forming the parietal layer (Fig. S) which remains persistent and with adjoining cells keeps on dividing to form the long beak of the nucellus (Fig. 22). The megasporocyte is carried down into the tissue quite a distance by the development of the parietal layer before any division occurs. The division of the megasporocyte is normal, giving rise to four equal megaspores (Fig. 10). The potential megaspores soon begin to dissolve and the lower or functional Jan., 1906.] Embryo Sac and Embryo of Cucumis sativus. 425 megaspore begins to enlarge (Figs. 11-12). The latter acquires a very large and distinct nucleus with a nucleolus of unusual size. Kirkwood reported to have found in Trichosanthes that after the division of the megasporocyte the upper cell did not again divide but immediately disorganized, while the lower cell again divided transversely, the upper cell of which also disor- ganized. The ultimate result, however, is the same in both Cucumis sativus and Trichosanthes, that is, the lowest of the megaspores always becomes the functional one. The embr^^o sac and its associated structures are quite small in comparison with the very large nucellus. The development proceeds in the normal way, by a longitudinal division of the nticleus of the megaspore (Fig. 13). At this stage often the potential megaspores have not completed their dissolution and remains of the third one can be seen just above the sac. The nuclei arrange themselves at either end of the sac in the center of which is a vacuole across which strands of protoplasm mav extend. In the four-celled stage the large irregular vacuole in the center is also prominent. By two successive divisions the eight-celled embryo sac is formed (Figs. 14-1-5). The svnergids are distinct and lie above the egg. In the early stage thev are somewdiat globular in shape and follow the outline of the sac. They lengthen considerably and at the time of fertilization they are quite long, sac-like structures. The egg is large and extends below the synergids, at first merely protruding a little beyond their base, but before fertilization it becomes much elongated and swollen (Fig. 17). The polar nuclei are unequal in size, the lower one being the larger. They conjugate before the entrance of the pollen tube. No case of double fertilization was observed ; if it occurs it must take place sometime after the polar nuclei are in contact. The antipodals are small cells which lie side by side, in the lower end of the sac. They take the stain more deeply than does the egg apparatus, and for this reason it is often difficult to make out their outline. The}^ do not enlarge but remain in place and are quite distinct even after considerable endosperm has developed. The development of the embryo is quite irregular. The first division of the oospore is transverse and the upper cell does not divide further and ma}^ be regarded as a rudimentary suspensor (Fig. 18). At this stage the synergids have begun to dissolve. The second division is by a longitudinal wall, the lower cell alone dividing. Later, one of the lower cells divides by a more or less oblique wall forming a four-celled embryo (Fig. 19) which is almost surrounded by endosperm. Above the embryo the remains of the two synergids can still be seen, although almost dissolved at this time. 426 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. VI, No. 3, The endosperm is continuous in the region of the embrvo but in the lower end of the sac it forms only a thin layer. The later divisions of the embryo are irregular; an oval mass of cells is formed from the end of which the cotyledons develop. When the embryo is about in the ten-celled stage walls begin to appear in the endosperm (Fig. 20). Kirkwood found in Lagenaria lagenaria and other species somewhat fiask-shaped embryos with prominent end cells which correspond closely to those of the same age in Cucumis (Fig. 21). The endosperm is not abundant but there is a greater amount around the embryo than elsewhere, often the lower portion of the embryo sac is entirely destitute of it. The endosperm stains more deeply along the peripheral margin and around the embrvo where the nuclei and starch grains are more abundant. The embryo, however, takes the stain much more prominently than any of the endosperm cells. The embryo develops a distinct layer of epidermal cells before any cotyledonary protuberances appear (Figs. 23-24). The embryo develops apically two cotyledons and distinctly shows the root tip before there is any sign of the appearance of the plumule (Fig. 25). The mature embryo sac contains only a small amount of scattered endosperm, the main food for the young plant being stored in the large cotyledons. In the mature embrvo the plumule is two-lobed showing the incipient first leaf (Fig'. 2G). The microsporangia appear to develop in the usual way from a plate of hypodermal cells. The cells of the sporogenous tissue are easily distinguished from the adjacent cells by their large size, and different reaction to stains. The young anther shows in cross section a single row of three microsporocytes in each microsporangium (Fig. 31) ; but in longitudinal section the plate shows a considerable length (Fig. 32). The mature pollen grain has a thick wall with a bulging at opposite sides. The tube nucleus and generative nucleus lie to one side of the grain near each other; the latter takes the stain more deeply than the cytoplasm of the rest of the grain, due to its denser structure. The behavior of the pollen tube in this species is of special interest. It is large and distinct and with Delafield's Haema- toxylin stains an amber color while the surrounding cells are a purplish blue ; with other stains it is of a deeper color. It enters the micropyle through the opening at the tips of the integuments, pierces the beak of the nucellus and makes its way down to the embryo sac by following a central path of much elongated clear cells which seem to offer little resistance and serve as a definite conducting tissue. The tube sometimes makes its way with Jan., 1906.] Embryo Sac and Embryo of Cueumis sativus. 427 little deviation (Fig. 27) throughout its entire course; but usu- ally there is a peculiar and characteristic bulging (Fig. 28) some distance above the embryo sac. It spreads out in the surround- ing tissue, completely breaking down the cell structure. How- ever, before it reaches the sac it again narrows, sometimes to a greater extent than elsewhere along its course. After it has pierced the sac it turns to one side or widens out into a foot-like process. The most typical tubes have not only a bulging but decided haustoria-like processes (Fig. 29) which extend out into the cell structure of the nucellus and in some cases even break through the inner integument (Fig. 30). The haustorial prolongations appear to act as absorbing and conducting agents for the food material of the embryo. Longo reports to have observed these processes in his study of cucurbita and believes them correlated with the distribution of starch in these parts. He also reports to have found in Cucurbita pepo a conducting tissue which the pollen tube follows from the stigma to the embryo sac. The points of especial interest and peculiarity observed in the deveolpment of Cucumis are (1) the long micropyle into which extends the long neck of the flask-shaped nucellus, (2) the presence of two well developed integuments, (3) the anatro- pous ovule with orthotropous embryo, (5) the small size of the embryo sac and associated structures in comparison with the size of the nucellus, (6) the irregular development of the embryo, and (7) the peculiar behavior of the pollen tube. The work represented in this paper was carried on under the direction of Prof. John H. Schaifner, to whom I wish to express my sincere thanks for valuable assistance and suggestions. PAPERS CITED. 1. Longo, Be agio, Richerche sulle Cucurbitaceae e il signi- ficato del percorso intercellular (endotropic) del tubetto pollinico. R. Accad. der Lincei, 30:523-547 pi. 1-6, 1903. 2. Longo, Beagio, Osservazioni e ricerche sulla nutrizione dell enbrione vegetale. Annali Botanica 2:373-396. 1905. 3. KiRKWooD, Joseph, The Comparative Embryology of the Cucurbitaceae. Bull. N. Y. Bot. Gar. 3:313-402. 1905. 428 The Ohio Naturalist. Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. VI, No. 3, P/afe XX/X. f - Tii,i.MAN on "Cucumis." Jan., 1906.] Embryo Sac and Embryo of Cucumis sativus. 429 Ohio Naturalist. Plate XXX. Tillman on "Cucumis." 430 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. VI, No. 3, EXPLANATION OF PLATES XXIX AND XXX. The drawings were made with the aid of an Abbe camera lucida and various combinations of f , i, and j^t oil immersion objectives and No. 2, 1, and % oculars. Fig. 1. Cross section of young ovulary showing incipient ovules. Figs. 2-5. Series of outlines showing development of integuments and degree of curvature of ovule at different stages. Fig. 6. Nucellus with archesporial cell. Fig. 7. Primary parietal cell and megasporocyte. Fig. 8. Transverse and longitudinal division of parietal layer. Fig. 9. Further division of parietal layer. Fig. 10. Second division of megasporocyte producing the four mega- spores. Fig. 11. Potential megaspores beginning to dissolve. Fig. 12. Enlargement of functional megaspore and further dissolution of three upper megaspores. Fig. 13. Two-celled embryo sac showing remains of third megaspore. Fig. 14. Four-celled embryo sac showing large vacuole in center. Fig. 15. Younger eight-celled embryo sac. Fig. 16. Older eight-celled embryo sac, showing polar nuclei in contact. Fig. 17. Upper end of embryo sac just before fertilization, showing large sac-like synergids, and polar nuclei fusing. Fig. 18. Two-celled embryo, and definitive nucleus. Fig. 19. Four-celled embryo with endosperm, and remains of two synergids, also pollen tube. Fig. 20. Young embryo of about ten cells showing irregular division. Fig. 21. Young embryo and scattered endosperm. Fig. 22. Outline of eight-celled embryo sac stage, showing micropyle with long beak of nucellus. Fig. 23. Section of young somewhat spherical embryo. Fig. 24. Embryo slightly older than that in preceding figure. Fig. 25. Section of embryo showing cotyledons. Fig. 26. Ovitline of mature embryo showing cotyledons, and jjlumule. Fig. 27. Entrance of pollen tube into micropyle and course through nvicellar beak. Fig. 28. Entrance of pollen tube into embryo sac, showing peculiar widening near the tip. Fig. 29. Pollen tube showing enlargement with haustoria-like jjrocesses, and bending to one side after entrance into the sac. Fig. 30. Pollen tube showing the haustoria-like processes extending through inner integument. Fig. 31. Cross section of anther showing microsporangia and micro- sporocytes. Fig. 32. Longitudinal section of anther. Fig. 33. Mature pollen grain with two nuclei. Jan., 1906.] Physiography and Geography. 431 PHYSIOGRAPHY AND GEOGRAPHY— THEIR RELATIONS, DIFFERENCES AND ESSENTIAL FIELDS.* Geo. D. Hubbard. Theoretically, it is conceded that geography shall be taught in the grades and physiography in the high schools, but prac- tically both are taught more or less all the way through. Hence ^ many do not see the boundary line which separates these twO' sciences. I speak of the subjects in the public schools only, because at present they are best known as parts of public school curricula, not because I believe they are or should be confined to these stages. Neither do I object to the above mentioned lack of differentiation in the elementary teaching. Pupils came to us in the colleges and universities totally blind, as have been their teachers before them, to any real dis- tinction between geography and physiography. The idea seems to prevail that the former includes the latter. Undoubtedly the use of the name physical geography for the latter cultivates the notion. Truly they are related but not quite in that way. Physiography, if not able to go alone, is more properly consid- ered a corporate part of geology. What then is the relation existing between these two sciences? Can one be studied with- out the other? Which one should receive attention first? Are they so related that they may be concurrently studied? These questions will be discussed in inverse order. In ele-. mentary work the pupil's interest centers in, and radiates from the human or life element. So in his geography he finds man harvesting grain with a cradle in Vermont, with a two- or three- horse reaper in Ohio and a steam header in Southern California, and he asks why. The answer comes in noting the topography, soil, and climate, and the condition of, and uses for, the straw. He incidentally learns something of the physiography of the places studied in order to explain the relations and responses which he has found. He reads of the arid climate of the Great Plains and then discovers the influence of the Rockies in pro- ducing the aridity, and ultimately comes to appreciate several points about mountains. He finds the railroads coming into Indianapolis and Columbus from all directions while they enter Cincinnati, Albany and Helena from only three or four. The teacher calls attention to the topography and he learns facts about plains and prairies, about mountains, passes and valleys. But through it all he is studying geography, not physiography. He is using simple, physiographic facts to explain and answer geographic questions. It is time enough to introduce the physiographic when the geographic requires it. * Read at the Cincinnati meeting, Ohio St. Acad, of Sci.. Dec. 2, 1905. 432 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. VI, No. 3, Again, when in physiography he studies the hfe history of a plateau and traces the feature from its geotectonic uplift through the steps of its dissection and aging, watching its valleys first deepen, then widen, and its level topped divides melt away to crests with long slopes, while the valley floors widen to occupy half or two-thirds of the region, he may incidentally note that the population and highways occupy the tops of the hills — the plateau surface — in youth, that the culture descends the slopes as the valleys mature, and that in maturity transportation routes, cities, and most of the people are in the valleys while the hill tops are left to pasture or forest. To sum up, a few facts in either science are gathered in the pursuit of the other, but the two subjects do not develop concurrently. To the second question, "which should receive the attention first," the answer depends upon the age and maturity of the pupil. If a child, geography first everytime. If a mature student, he may well prepare for geography b}" a strong course in physiography ; but the phenomena, reasoning, and philosophy of the latter are far beyond the experience and power of the child, to say nothing of the locus of his interest. The remaining question, "can one be studied without the other," has been at least partly answered. In physiography, one does not need to learn many facts of geograph}^ and he cer- tainly ought not to follow up the relations to man and his responses to the influence of the conditions, far enough to detract from the systematic development of his subject. In geography, he uses the facts of this related science as he does those of history, sociology and anthropology, but he does not attempt to grasp its philosophy. Turning to the second division of the subject, "their differ- ences" it is apparent from what has preceded that they often deal with the same features and phenomena. They seem in many topics to use the same basal materials but in a different way. For illustration — in physiography the valley is a topic. It is described, its origin and the evolution of its parts are dis- cussed. Its development is traced and a definite age is ascribed to it. Its end is predicted. Its genetic relation to the sur- rounding region is discussed. In geography, the same valley is noted as a control of the movements of men and goods, as a home for a state, clan or a certain group of men, or as the seat of adapted industries. Its commercial or economic relations to the surrounding region are noted. Another illustration is furnished by the river. In physiogra- phy, its course through the valley and the regional topography is considered ; the work accomplished in its normal development ; its method of procedure in carving its valley, enlarging its Jan., 1906.] Physiography and Geography. 433 curves, extending its course, and broadening its territory; its relation to other streams, to lakes or the ocean. But in geogra- phy the transportation facilities offered, the power made avail- able, thfe possibilities for irrigation, city water supply, and park and scenic uses, these are the subtopics. Its location, whither it leads, what cities on its banks and why; the inter-relation and the inter-action of man and the river, there are its interests. In a similar way the plain and mountain, the sea and shoreline receive different treatment in the course of the development of the two subjects. These sciences, however, are not different from others in this respect; for chemistry, geology and physics all deal with matter and natural forces, and history, economics, and sociology all study man's institutions. The difference between geography and physiography is one of point of view. Physiography concerns itself with the descrip- tion, and the classification of physiographic forms on the basis of the cycle, process or the family; geography with the relations of these same forms to man. In the former the principle is sys- tematization ; in the latter, relation. For example, take a plain. In physiography its characteristics are listed, its origin is deter- mined, its age in its normal cycle of development, the processes in operation upon it, and its relation to the surrounding topo- graphic features. A comparison with other plains is made and the types are discussed until the specific feature, say the coastal plain of Alabama and Mississippi has been referred to its type and class, to its variety and age. It may be called a belted coastal plain, submaturely dissected in its inland portion and less dissected and slightly drowned along the coast. Sys- tematization is the objective. In geography the same plain comes up as the home of the cotton growing industry. The especial adaptations to this business and to others are discussed ; the features of the plain to wdiich transportation responds, the location of its cities, roads and ports, the distribution of its crops and minerals, population and industries are shown to be related to its levelness, its belted structure, its stage of dissection, and the position of its harbors and other commercial outlets. In all these points it may be compared with other plains. In these relations centers the interest, and through their recognition comes the gain to the student. This essential difference appears early in the study but becomes clearer as each subject emerges from the high school curriculum. Beginnings are made, and some facts learned, but the complete organization of the truth pertaining to the science can not be accomplished in elementary schools nor by immature 434 ^^ Ohio. Naturalist. [Vol. VI, No. 3, pupils. Just as nature study introduces the plant and animal kingdoms to the child and high school zoology and botanv con- tinue to familiarize him with them, so as to pave the wav for college and university research into the fundamental principles of the sciences of zoology and botany; so nature study, and subsequently, geography and physiography supply basal con- ceptions for the extended quest for knowledge in the separate sciences of our subject. We are now prepared for a brief treatment of the third division of the subject, "their essential fields." We have gone far enough already to Vjegin to see the scope of each. Physiography describes, classifies, and discusses the origin of the features of the earth. It compares similar and dissimilar, related and unrelated forms always seeking to reduce the multitudinous variety to a system, to group likes and correlate related speci- mens. It concerns itself with the physiographic processes and forces of the earth, air, and sea and endeavors to explain all the workings of all, and to understand the nature of all physio- graphic features. Such a field and purpose constitute piivsi- ography a science. They proclaim it to have problems, easy and hard, short and long, solved and unsolved, and I may say, solvable and unsolvable. All this means, further, that the ele- mentary introduction, which the high school boy receives, to the general subject does not acquaint him with the science. It onlv puts him in touch with some of its facts and theories, and enables him to see and work out for himself, other truths; or to pursue the subject more at length in the University. And geography possesses a field more biotic, anthropic, and industrial but centering in the relation of the anthropic phenom- ena to the physiographic. Its seeks to discover all responses of mankind to his physical environment; to show how human industries are related to the distribution of natural resources and to the facilities for moving and marketing them; to show why man lives where he does and as he does so far as these depend upon the physiographic, climatic, and geographic con- ditions or upon the distributions of natural features or phenom- ena; to trace his institutions, the elements of his character and the nature of his aspirations as far as they are related to the physical surroundings; and, having accummulated all these data, to reduce them to systems, and to organize them into laws and principles. Geographers have been working in this field for two milleniums and a vast body of material has been collected. Much of the material has been classified; laws have been found,, principles discovered, and, today, one of the oldest of sciences is again finding itself. Here, too, only beginnings are mastered in the elementary schools. In subject matter, both quality and quantity, and irt Jan., 1906.] Occurrence of Sex Organs in Aelosoma. 435 method of treatment and philosophy, geography in its higher phases is a university subject. Universities in France, Germany, Austria and to some extent in other countries, have prepared for the studv of geography in their courses. Two or three Amer- ican universities give some systematic instruction in advanced geographv. Many more should and, I trust, will, if for no other reason than the utilitarian, the preparation of teachers for elementary and secondary schools and the equipment of men for business, diplomatic, and government positions where a knowledge of the principles of geography is of inestimable value. To stim up, then, physiography and geography are two dis- tinct sciences. They each contribute to the full appreciation of the other ; especially does the former minister to the latter. They often deal with the same basal materials, but not in the same way nor to the same end. Physiography describes and classifies phvsiographic features and discusses the processes and agencies bv which thev are made. Geography shows the relations exist- ing between man and his phA^sical environment and classifies the influences and responses. Both physiography and geogra- phv are large, complex, and, as yet, not fully developed sciences, and therefore present to the investigator many unsolved and difficult problems. A NOTE ON THE OCCURRENCE OF SEX ORGANS IN AELOSOMA.' Jas. a. Nelson, Ph. D. The genus Aelosoma, representing the family Aphanoneura, and containing the most primitive members of the oligochaetous annelids, is remarkable, among other things, in that sexual reproduction occurs very rarely, the asexual method being the usual one. The latter consists in a process of fission or budding, by which the young individual is constricted ofT from the pos- terior portion of the parent, this process often taking place so rapidly that chains of individuals are formed, representing three or more generations. This process is continuous during the life of the individual, and probably amply suffices, as far as numbers are concerned, to insure the maintenance of the species. Sexual reproduction does, however, step in occasionally, and has been described by U'Ddekem in 1862,- and more recently by Stole'' and Maggi.'* According to these authors a testis is found in the fifth segment, (counting the prostomium as the first) ; an ovary 1 Cijntribvited from the Laboratory of Entomology and General Invertebrate Zoology of Cornell University. 2 Bull. Acad. Sci. Rov. Belg. XII. 3 SB. Bohm. Gesc. 1889. 4 Soc. Ital. Nat. Sci. I. 436 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. VI, No. 3, with a central opening in the sixth segment; pairs of sperma- tothecae in the third, fourth, and fifth segments; and a clitellum confined to the ventral surface of the fifth, sixth and seventh segments. Among a number of individuals of an undescribed species of Aelosoma, taken from the vivarium of the University of Penn- sylvania about December 1st, 1901, ten were found containing the sex products in various stages of development. Of these three were hermaphroditic, four contained ova alone, and three male sex cells alone. Thus while this species is plainly her- maphroditic, it seems probable that eggs and sperms do not mature simultaneously in the same individual. The occurrence of ripe spermatozoa, (represented in Fig. 5), and immature ova in the same individual indicates that the species is protandrous, but the evidence is insufficient to decide this question. Many of those in which sex cells were found were also reproducing asexually in the usual manner. The ova, (Fig. 1), are found in the fifth, sixth, and seventh segments, in some cases in only one of these segments, in others in all three. One individual, however, contained ova in the fourth, fifth and sixth segments. They are attached to the thin peritoneal layer lining the body cavity, and lie below the stom- ach and lateral to the ventral blood vessel, In Fig. 1 the larger of the two ova represented is by far the largest observed, measur- ing ca. 55 micra across, and is probably approaching maturity. It occupies a median position, compressed between the stomach wall (st.) and the ventral hypodermis (hyp.), the walls of the ventral blood vessel (b. v.) having been ruptured. The smaller ovum occupies the usual position. Both ova possess a vesicular nucleus (germinal vesicle) containing scattered chromatin granules and a large nucelolus, enclosing a vacuole. The cyto- plasm is packed with deeply staining yolk granules. The num- ber of ova is small in all of my preparations, one of the best showing only eight in the three ova-bearing segments. No evidences were found of an oviduct, a clitellum, or of sperm- atothecae. Although no clear evidence of the presence of testes was found the ripening male sexual elements (Figs. 2-5) were seen floating free in the body cavity, being found in greatest abundance near the point where stomach and intestine join. They appear as groups or nests of cells, more or less spherical in form. Four kinds of these can be readily distinguished by the character of their component cells; the primary spermatocytes, the secondary spermatocytes, the spermatids, and the spermatozoa. The primary spermatocytes, (Fig. 2), form cell nests made uji of comparatively few cells, in size the largest of the series, their nuclei measuring ca. 3.9 micra in diameter. As Fig. 2 shows, Jan., 1906.] Occurrence of Sex in Organs in Aelosoma. 437 the nuclei lie at the outer ends of their cells; each contains a closely packed ball of chromatin granules, separated from the nuclear membrane by a slight space, while at the periphery of the nucleus is a large and conspicuous nucleolus (plasmasome). The cytoplasm is faintly granular. The secondary spermatocytes make up cell masses similar to those of the primary spermato- cytes, differing from the latter only in the size and number of the component cehs. The cell masses of which the spermatids are composed, however, present a very different appearance, (Fig. 4). The nuclei, although now much reduced in size, still show the closely packed ball of chromatin granules and the prominent nucleolus' characteristic of the two former stages, and have also y ■■:■■■» I «>*-^ Fig. 1. Portion of a cross-section through seventh segment, two ova (ov.), lying between the stomach wall (st.), and the ventral hypodermis (hyp.);" Fig. 2, primary spermatocytes; Fig. 3, secondary spermatocytes; Fig. 4, spermatids; Fig. 5, spermatozoa. Fig. I,x770; Figs. 2-5, x 1050. maintained their position at the periphery of the cell mass. Each nucleus is now surrounded by an area of clear cytoplasm, the clear areas of the different cells being contigous, so that the cell mass is divided into an external zone of clear and transparent cytoplasm, within which is a mass of darkly granular cytoplasm, which already shows signs of vacuolization. This latter mass, of course, represents the inner ends of the spermatids. Between the spermatids and the ripe spermatozoa, no intermediate stages were found. The spermatozoa, (Fig. 5), consist of a long fusi- form chromatic portion, which no doubt represents the sperm- atid nucleus, and which tapers posteriorly to join with a slender tail, composed of clear cytoplasm. The anterior end of the chromatic portion is sharply truncate, and somewhat concave. In this concavity lies the biconcave, clear, apical body. The 438 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. VI, No. 3, spermatozoa surround a mass of protoplasm, within which their heads are buried. This mass, greatly vacuolated, and clearly in process of degeneration, represents the granular mass fonned by the central ends of the spermatids. Thus only a slight por- tion of the original cytoplasm takes part in the formation of the spermatozoan, by far the larger portion being cast aside. It is, of course, possible that this mass may serve for a time to nourish the spermatozoa, although it would seem likely that the blood lymph contained in the coelom would suffice to perform that function. In the maturation of the male germ cells one point is espe- cially noteworthy, namely, the appearance of a large nucleolus in the spermatocytes of both orders and in the spermatids. With but rare exceptions, throughout the animal kingdom the maturation divisions occur without the intervention of even a brief resting stage. The formation of a nucleolus, then, of such a considerable size in comparison with the cell size is remarkable in indicating the occurrence of a long resting stage between the two maturation divisions, and also a long pause before the metamorphosis of the spermatid into the spermatozoon. With respect to the sexual reproduction of Aelosoma several questions arise, which are still unanswered. For example, it is important to discover what factors determine the occurrence of sexual reproduction; whether due to changes in temperature, food supply, or to some other cause ; the breeding habits should be carefully studied, and the complete history of the sex cells recorded. Species of Aelosoma are found abundantly in our inland ponds and streams, and are ea-ily kept in aquaria throughout the year, I hope these facts may stimulate some one to the further investigation of the life history of this beautiful form. A PRELIMINARY REPORT ON THE MOSQUITOES OF OHIO.* A. F. Burgess. Since it was positively demonstrated that mosquitoes are the means of communicating yellow fever and malaria, many investigators have given attention to collecting, studying and describing these insects; hence, during the past five years rapid strides have been made in our knowledge concerning this interesting family. In the catalog of North American Diptera, published by Mr. J. M. Aldrich, in 1905, thirty genera, containing one hun- dred and sixty-five species of Culicidae, are listed. Some of these species are tropical or sub-tropical forms which do not occur in northern latitudes. * Read at the meeting of the Ohio St. Acad, of Sci., Cincinnati, Dec. 2, 1005. Jan., 1906.] Report on the Mosquitoes of Ohio. 439 Several states have undertaken special investigations of the mosquito problem, and as a result Dr. Felt reports fifty species as occurring in New York and the adjoining states. Dr. J. B. Smith has found forty-two species in New Jersey, and Dr. Dupree has collected thirty-seven species in Louisiana. Doubtless some of the species found in these states do not occur in Ohio, as thev are either inhabitants of a warmer climate, or breed in salt or brackish water found along or near the sea coast. It is the object of this paper to list the species that have been collected in this state, giving the localities where they were taken and the dates the captures were made, and it is hoped that sufficient interest may be aroused in the subject so that further investigations may be made of this important family. Some collecting was undertaken by the writer at spare moments during the past summer, but this resulted in the collection of only a few species. The accompanying hst represents the record of the material in the collection of the Entomological Department of the Ohio State University, which has been placed at my disposal through the courtesy of Profs. Osborn and Hine; and the assistance received from the latter has made it possible to prepare this report. Records of speci- mens are also included, which were collected by Mr. W. E. Evans, a student in Entomology at the Ohio State University, and credit is given in each case. I am also indebted to Dr. L. 6. Howard, Entomologist to the United States Department of Agriculture, for having placed at my disposal the notes in his office on species received from Ohio, and to Mr. D. W. Coquillett for determining many of the species in the following list : Anopheles maculipennis Meigen. Sandusky, (Cedar Point) Julv 8, 1903. (Hine). Anopheles punctipennis Say. Columbus, September 8, 1898. July 13, 1898. October 12, 1900. March 9, 1903. (Hine). Megarhinus portoricensis Roeder. Portsmouth, September 9, 1897. (Hine). Toxorhychites rutilus Coq. Cincinnati, August 27, 1902. (Dury). Janthinosoma musica Say. Vinton, June 5-12, 1900. (Hine). Psorophora ciliata Fabr. Medina, June 10, 1899. Sandusky (Cedar Point), August 7, 1902. Wauseon, September 5, 1903. Akron, June 16, (Hine)^ Cu!ex canadensis Theobald. Medina, Julv 19, 1898. Vinton, June 6- 12, 1900. (Hine). Culex cantans Meigen. Sugar Grove, May 25, 1901. Medina, June 16. Columbus, Mav 14. Sandusky (Cedar Point), Julv 23, 1903. Lon- don, June 23,' 1904. (Hine). Culex confinis Arrib. Sandusky (Cedar Point), July 27, 1905. (W. E. Evans). Culex consobrinus Desvoidv. Columbus, October 23, 1905. (W. E. Evans) Culex pipiens Linn. Columbus, March 16, 1898. October 12, 1900. (Hine). Cincinnati, September 13, 1905. (Burgess). Davton, Octo- ber 4, 1905. (E. C. Cotton). Columbus, November 20, 1905' (Burgess). 440 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. VI, No. 3, Culex restuans Theobald. Vinton, June 5, 1900. (Hine). Culex sylvestris Theobald. Wauseon, September 5, 1903. (Hine). San- dusky (Cedar Point), July 27, 1905. (W. E. Evans). Hooker, Sep- temli'er 5, 1905. (Cotton). Dayton, September 27, 1905. (Burgess). Culex triseriatus Say. Medina, July 7, 1898. Vinton, June 5-12, 1900. (Hine). Cincinnati, August 2-8, 1905. (Dury). Culex trivittatus Coq. Ft. Ancient, June 10-12, 1902. (Hine). Taeniorhynchus perturbans Walk. Sandusky (Cedar Point), Julv 23, 1003. (Hine). Aedes smithii Coq. Cleveland. (Reported by Howard.) It will be observed that seventeen species have thus far been captured in Ohio. The most interesting among them, from an economic standpoint, are Anopheles maculipennis, which was taken at Sandusky, July Sth, 1903, and A. punctipennis, which has been taken at Columbus in March, July, September and October of various years, as they are the probable agents for the distribution of malaria. Aside from the biting propensities of many species of mos- quitoes, which cause annoyance and render some localities well nigh uninhabitable at certain seasons of the year, the knowledge that these two species are present in the state is very important. Although malaria is not considered a fatal disease, it caused sixty-eight deaths in the state during the year 1903, and doubt- less this number represents only a small percentage of the persons who suffered from its enervating effects. From the fact that one of the species listed, namely, Culex confinis, was first collected and described in South America, but was taken this summer at Sandusky, and further that the yellow fever mosquito (Stegomyia fasciata) was collected at Louisville, Ky., in October, 1903, by Dr. T. B. Berry, and has been found during the present year at Evansville, Ind., and Lexington, Ky., it is evident that some of the species of this family have a wide range of distribution It would appear possible for the latter species to be carried by boats from southern ports to almost any Ohio river town. Our knowledge of the distribution of this and other species is at present imperfect, and many points concerning the habits, life history and hibernation must be investigated if the problem is to be dealt with in an intelligent manner. Neglect to obtain positive knowledge may at some future time result in loss of life, as well as seriously injure the business interest of localities involved ; hence it would appear that no time should be lost in carefully and thoroughly investigating the problem. Columbus, Ohio. Jan., 1906.] Report on the State Herbarium. 44 1 ANNUAL REPORT ON THE STATE HERBARIUM FOR THE YEARS 1903, '04, AND '05.* W. A. Kellerman, H. H. York, and H. A. Gleason. No report of the progress of the State Herbarium has been pubhshed since January, 1904. During this time it has grown steadily and improved both in size and usefulness. Botanists throughout the state have shown an interest in it, and have aided in its development by sending specimens. Of especial value are the donations of L' D. Stair and S. E. Horlacher, the former including a fine series from Cuyahoga County, with a number of species new to the state flora, and the latter covering a number of counties in the southwestern part of the state and likewise containing several unreported species. Following the usual custom, a hst is appended of the col- lectors and of the number of specimens contributed by each. Aiken, W. H 1 Mark, Clara G 2 Billups, A. C 1 Sanders, E. A 1 Brockett, Ruth E 1 Sanders, J. G 7 Brown, G.J 1 SchafTner, J. H 3 Brvant, F. B 3 Sharp, Mrs. K. D 33 CoVentrv, E. J 16 Shull, G. H 2 Edgerton, L. B 2 Stair, L. D 367 Hacker, 0 1 Tangeman, Clara M 1 Hard, M. E 3 True, H. L 1 Herzer, H 15 Webb, R. J., and Rood, A. N. 2 Hopkins, L. S 74 Wetzstein, A 2 Horlacher, S. E 823 WiUiams, T. D 1 Jennings, O. E 216 Wilkinson, E 7 Kellerman, W. A 93 Young, C. H 1 Lantz EF 1 Lazenby,' wV R.'. '.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'. 1 Total 1692 The following species have been added to the state flora: The following species have been added to the state flora: 36a. Asplenium ebenoides R. R. Scott. Hocking County, W. A. Keller- man and K. F. Kellerman. 36b. Asplenium parvulum Mart, and Gal. Adams County, W. A. Kellerman. Reported in Ohio Naturalist 5:206. 60 a Lycopodium porophilum Llovd and Underw. Fairfield County, J. H. Schaffner. 131a. Panicum implicatum Scribn. Cuyahoga County, L. D. Stair. 196a. Agrostis asperifolia Trin. Cuyahoga County, L. D. Stair. 212c. Beckmannia erucaeformis (L.) Host. Cuyahoga County, L. D. Stair. 255a. Festuca capillata Lam. Cuvahoga County, L. D. Stair. 265a. Bromus brizaeformis Fisch. and Mey. Cuyahoga County, L. D. Stair. 265c. Bromus arvensis L. Cuyahoga County. L. D. Stair. 274a. Elymus hirsutiglumis Scribn, and Sm. Ottawa County, J. H. Schaffner; also in Huron County. * Presented at the Ohio St. Acad, of Sci., Cincinnati mesting, Dec. 2, 1905. 442 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. VI, No. 3, 46()a. 376a. 472b. 477a. 547a. 627a. 715a. 755a. 757b. 877a. 963a. 1033a. in37a. 1037b. 1037c. 1037d. 1037e. 1037f. 1037?. 1058a. 1147a. 1242a. 1243a. 1245a. 1303a. 1417a. 1561a. 1615a. 162Sa. 1650b. 1699a. 1755a. 1794a. 1794b. 1811a. 1834a. 1893a. 1963a. 1967a. 2008a. Carex tenuis interjecta (Bailey) Britt. Cuyahoga County, L. D. Stair. Carex alata ferruginea Fernald. Madison County, W. A. Kellerman Mayaca aubleti Aiichx. Auglaize County, A. Wetzstein. Tradescantia refiexa Raf. Auglaize County, A. Wetzstein. Smilax pulverulenta Michx. Montgomery County, S. E. Horlacher. Salix babylonica L. X fragilis L. Erie County, R. F. Griggs. Polygonum punctatum leptostachyum (Meisn.) Small. Auglaize County, A. Wetzstein. Gomphrena globosa L. Wood County, W. A. Kellerman. Allionia nyctaginea ovata (Pursh) Morong. Green County, S. E. Horlacher. Bocconia cordata Willd. Madison County, Mrs. K. D. Sharp. Philadelphus grandiflorus Willd. Auglaize County, A. Wetzstein. Aronia atropurpurea Britton. Licking County, W. A. Kellerman. Crataegus -wilkinsoni Ashe. Richland County, E. Wilkinson. Crataegus decens Ashe. Richland County, E. Wilkinson. Crataegus habilis Ashe. Richland County, E. Wilkinson. Crataegus macgeese Ashe. Richland County, E. Wilkinson. Crataegus tenuifolia Ashe. Richland County, E. Wilkinson. Crataegus exigua Ashe. Richland Coitnty, E. Wilkinson. Crataegus prona Ashe. Richland County, E. Wilkins6n. Cassia medsgeri Shafer. Reported from several counties, Ohio Naturalist 5:264. Linum melium (Planch.) Britt. Erie County, E. L. Moseley. Hypericum virgatum Lam. Jackson County, W. A. Kellerman. Hypericum subpetiolatum Bickn. Reported from tAventj'-four counties. Heretofore confused with H. maculatum. Hypericum boreale (Britton) Bicknell. Defiance County, E. L. Fullmer; Geauga County, O. E. Jennings. Kneiffia fruticosa piloselia (Raf.) Britton. Cuvahoga County, L. D. Stair. Fraxinus biltmoreana Beadle. Erie County, W. A. Kellerman; Hamilton County, Walter Aiken. Monarda mollis L. Miami County, S. E. Horlacher; also in Cuya- hoga County, L. D. Stair, and Erie County, W. A. Kellerman and F. J. Tyler. Scrophularia ieporella Bicknell. Cuyahoga County, L. D. Stair. Synthyris bullii (Eaton) Barnh. Montgomery County, H. Grenen. Gerardia fenufolia asperula Gray. Green County, S. E. Horlacher. Galium claytoni Michx. Champaign County, J. H. Schaffner,, (). E. Jennings, and F. J. Tyler. Cichorium intybus divaricatum DC. Montgomery County, S. E. Horlacher. Erie County, E. O. Jennings. Britton. Franklin County O. E. Xanthium commune Britton. Xanthium glabratum (DC.) Jennings. Lacinaria punctata (Hook.) Kuntze. Franklin County, J. H. Schaffner. SoliJago juncea scabrella (T. and G.) Gray. Erie County, E. L. Ml )Sele\'. Aster laleriflorus horizontalis (Desf.) Burgess. Cuyahoga County, L. D. Stair; Madison County, Mrs. K. D. Sharp. Bidens elliptica (Wicgand) Gleason. Common throughout the state. Bidens vulgata Greene. Throughout the state. Arctium tomentosum (Lam.) Schk. Erie Count}', J. H. Schaffner; Huron County, H. H. York. Jan., 1906.] How to Collect Stylopidae. 443 HOW TO COLLECT STYLOPIDAE.* Charles Durv. It is well known to entomologists that many genera of wasps, bees and insects of other orders, are at times affected with par- asites which live in their abdominal cavities. In the genera Xenos and Stylops, the adult female is larvaform and never leaves the body of the host, but the male when readv to pupate projects the end of the pupa case outwards, between the seg- ments, where it can easily be seen protruding. By examining wasps and bees when they frequent flowers, it can readily be observed as to whether or not they are parasitized. The female Xenos can be distinguished from the male by the broad flat projecting head. The male pupa case is rounder and separates the segments to a greater extent. When a wasp is found with male pupa, it may be secured and brought home alive. Confine it in a jelly tumbler with a cheese cloth cover over the top; in the bottom of the glass there should be placed a round bit of blotting paper and a piece of screen wire, raised up from the bottom. This is necessary because the instant the Xenos hatches the wasp rushes after it, in an endeavor to catch, kill and bite it to pieces, an example of an interesting instinct. The move- ments of the Xenos are so rapid, that the wasp can not catch it until it falls exhausted in the bottom of the glass. Bv having the false bottom of wire, the Xenos falls through, the wasp not being able to follow, and the specimen can thus be secured. The wasp while confined in the glass must be fed. This may be done with jelly and water, putting it on the cheese cloth cover in one small spot, with a camel's hair brush. Many fine spec- imens have been hatched by the writer in this way, from five genera of wasps, several of which are new host wasps, and the facts and species obtained are entirely new to science. There are yet some interesting problems in the life history of these curious insects that are unknown. In looking through some of the largest and finest collections of insects recently at Wash- ington and New York, only a few poor specimens in this family were found while in some otherwise valuable collections they are not even represented. In view of a monograph of these insects in course of preparation by W. D. Pierce, the publication of which will occur soon, material from all parts of the country is very much desired. * Presented at the Ohio St. Acad, of Sci., Cincinnati meeting, Dec. 1, 1905. 444 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. VI, No. 3, SOME NOTES ON MARTYNIA. V. Sterki. During the summers of 1904 and '05, I made a series of observations on some plants of Martynia proboscidea, and a few notes may not be without interest. The seeds sprout very slowly, whether wintered in the ground or indoors. Some sown in April and early May did not come up until the middle of June and the first part of July. It seems that the seeds require a rather high temperature. In fairly rich soil the plants grow to a diameter of from four to six feet, while on poor soil and in the shade they remain quite small. The leaves, at first opposite, gradually become more and more scattered on branches of the second, third, etc., orders. They are decidedly dimorphous ; those standing above and below on the branches are typically symmetrical and comparatively wider, while those at the sides are narrower and asymmetrical, especially at the base, the proximal part being longer than the distal and more or less incurved. The plants are decidedly heliotropic. While still quite young and only a few inches high, they are inclined towards the East in the morning and towards the West in the evening. When they grow larger, the leaves take a conspicuous part in the movements. Those standing towards the East and West raise and lower their blades, while those directed North and South turn on their petioles. It was especially noted that even on cloudy mornings, at dawn, when the eye could hardly dis- tinguish a difference of light between East and West, the plants were decidedly inclined towards the East. All parts of the plant, except the inner surface of the deeper part of the corolla tube and of the calyx, are densely beset with glandular hairs containing a viscid fluid on which hundreds of small insects are caught. It is a question as to whether they are assimilated as food. Frost kills the plants and they soon decay or become dry. But the immature fruits remain green and fresh for one to sev- eral weeks if protected from severe frosts. There is no doubt that the thick fleshy husk has an important part to play in the ripening of the seed. The most interesting variations occur in the flower. Nor- mally the calyx is split down to the pedicel or nearly so, on the inferior side, with five lobes, the upper, median lobe being the longest. The corolla, large and showy on strong plants, 50-65 mm. long and of about the same diameter, has normallv five lobes, two upper ones which are the equivalent of an upper lip, one on each side, and one lower which is broader than the others Jan., 1906.] Some Notes on Martynia. 445 and of somewhat different shape. Along the inferior side of the corolla tube and extending into the inferior lobe is a group of usually five orange colored stripes, which I call the "lyra." The stamens are four, in two pairs, arranged so that the four large anthers are contiguotis in two pairs and adjacent to the upper arch of the corolla. There is also an upper median, short stamen-vestige, usually somewhat bent to the right or left. These well known details are given for a better understanding of the variations noted below: 1. Small, more or less abortive, flowers appear late in Sept. and Oct. ; but it is remarkable that such were from the first on the same spike with and among large, perfect flowers, without intermediate forms. Later with cooler weather and slow growth thev became numerous. The corolla was only 20-30 mm. long and the lobes, always of the normal number, were quite small and not at all or little spread out. The colors were paler than in the large flowers. The stamens were nearly straight or irregularlv curved, isolated and not joining above and the anthers were small, pale, more or less abortive, yet usually bearing some pollen. The vestigial stamen was always present and the calyx of the usual shape but comparatively somewhat larger than the corolla. At least part of the flowers were fructescent, as the ovularies grew so far as the weather permitted. The bumble bees are regular visitors of the flowers and the latter may have been pollinated from the large perfect flowers. 2. In some cases there is only one upper lobe of the corolla and not a trace of the stamen vestige; otherwise corolla, sta- mens, and calyx are normal. Over a dozen such flowers were seen on a few plants during 1905. ,3. One flower, observed Aug. 31, 1905, was very abnormal. There were four corolla lobes, apparently an upper, lower, and two lateral, yet the who'e upper part of the corolla appeared to be wanting. The lower part had the usual "lyra" and the right and left sides and lobes each with faint lyra markings. There were four stamens spreading and curving about irreg- ularly with the anthers arranged T-shape on the filaments rather than lengthwise. There was no trace of an upper stamen vestige. The calyx was divided irregularly into two parts down to the pedicel, a smaller portion consisting of one lobe on the right, upper side and a larger one with three somewhat rudi- mentarv lobes. The fruit resulting from this flower is also abnormal ; the pod is straight, of the same formation above and below; the projecting crest on the upper side is wanting; both halves of the beak are curved to the left. 4. In some otherwise normal flowers, the upper' stamen vestige grows to one-third and even to fully the length of the other stamens, and has a more or less well developed anther sometimes even with some pollen. 446 The Ohio Naturalist [Vol. VI, No. 3, 5. Flowers having the corolla of the usual size with two lateral lobes on the right or left side and three stamens on the same side. Either the upper or the intermediate stamen seems to be the additional one of the three. In a flower with two corolla lobes and three stamens on the right side, the interme- diate one was evidently additional, being only half as long as the others and with a rudimentary anther. In all of these flowers the usual upper stamen vestige was present and the calyx nor- mal. In the descriptions "right and left" refer to the flower and not to the observer. 6. One flower, with two corolla lobes and three stamens on the right side, had the left lobe distinctly but not deeply incised in the middle and there was no trace of a third stamen. 7. One flower of good size had two lateral corolla lobes and three stamens on the left side and one lobe with two stamens on the right. The upper lobes were separated by only a slight but distinct incision and the stamen vestige was wanting. The calyx was closed below and had an additional lower median lobe. 8. A flower with two lateral lobes and three stamens on each side. In this case the stamen vestige was present and the calyx normal. 9. A type of flower with the lower lobe of the corolla double, and two well formed "lyras". One additional, median stamen was developed below. This sometimes curved upward to join the cluster of the other anthers, or in some flowers it was directed nearly straight forward. The upper vestige was present and the calyx was closed below and contained a sixth median, inferior lobe. In 1904 two such flowers were seen and in 1905 at least one developed a normal two-parted fruit. 10. One flower with the same peculiarities as those men- tioned under S, but the left lower lobe and the left lyra were not fully developed. The lower, median stamen filament was adnate to the corolla its entire length, as also the lower half of the anther, but the other half was standing out free. 11. One flower with two lower lobes and two "lyras"; two lateral lobes on the left side and one on the right ; with stamens to correspond, three on the left and two on the right and one inferior, median stamen. The calyx was entire and had an additional, inferior, median lobe as in No. 8. 12. One flower of normal size with two inferior lobes and two "lyras." The lateral lobes were present but were separated from the inferior lobe by incisions less distinct than usual. There were three stamens, the upper pair and one inferior median stamen longer than the two others. There was no trace of the inferior pair but the vestigial stamen appeared as usual, and the calvx was the same as in No. 8. Jan., 1906.] Lower Ordovician in Kentucky. 447 In all the normal and abnormal flowers the style was of the same form except that it was smaller in the defective flowers mentioned in No. 1. All the abnormal flowers were found on large strong plants, while the flowers on smaller plants growing in poorer soil were all normal, although numerous and of fair size, Martynia seems to be a plant peculiarly adapted for studies in variation and peculiar forms of flowers, and it would be very desirable to have some person take up the subject further. New Philadelphia. CLASSIFICATION AND MAPPING OF THE LOWER ORDO- VICIAN IN KENTUCKY.* A. M. :\IlLLER. The paper presented the results of the operations of the New Kentucky Geological Survey as they relate to the Lower Ordovician. Highbridge is accepted from the Richmond Folio as a saits- facotry name for the "Kentucky River Limestones" known in the Old Kentucky Survey Reports as Chazy and Birdse3'e. Camp Nelson, Oregon and Tyrone are proposed as names for what were formerly known as Chazy, Kentucky River Marble, and Birdseve Proper respectively. Lexington is also accepted from the Richmond Folio, and is divided in ascending order into Curdsville, Logana, Wilmore, Paris and Perryville, the latter being Linney's "Upper Birdseye." Flannagan Chert of the Richmond Folio, as the name for a persistent horizon, is dropped. It has been found to truncate beds lying in and just above the Upper Paris where there have been brought to the surface under the influence of slow atmos- pheric weathering. Near the summit of the culminating point of the Cincinnati Anticline in Central Kentucky (Jessamine Dome) this horizon is marked by an abundance of phosphate, in some cases rich enough to invite an attempt to exploit for commercial purposes. This deposit is identified as the geological equivalent of the Mt. Pleasant Phosphate of Tenn. Winchester is accepted from the Folio referred to above, as the name for the formation coming next above the Lexington, and an attempt is made to assign to it more definite limits than heretofore. A wave marked crinoidal limestone, carrying in northern situations Trinucleus concentricus, is taken as the upper limit of the Winchester. The fauna of the Winchester is found to possess strong Cincinnatian affinities and is accordingly * Abstract of paper read Dec. 2, Cincinnati, Ohio St. Acad, of Sci. 448 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. VI, No. 3, grouped in with this division of the Ordovician as its basal member. Eden is accepted from Orton's Report on the Lower Silurian published in Vol. I of the Ohio Geological Survey 1S73, as the name for the 250 feet of shale series which surmounts the Win- chester. Southward it is found to be thinner, aggregating per- haps 200 feet and with a well prounonced sandstone ("vSiliceous Mudstone" of the older Kentucky Survey Reports) in the upper part. The name Garrard is retained from the Richmond Folio for this portion, and Million, a name proposed by Foerste, is accepted for the remainder. The Eden is found to be a very widespread formation in Central Kentucky, with its outcrop everywhere marked by the same topographic features. It dis- stecs into very steep slopes, which, under the influence of culti- vation soon wash bare of soil. As regards economic features: The Highbridge yields excel- lent building stones. The Lexington is traversed by lead and zinc mineral veins, which have as their most common gangue, barite, shows phosphate and furnishes soil which is the "Blue Grass" par excellence. The Winchester furnishes grazing lands scarcely inferior. The Eden, however, is found to furnish soils which wear out rapidly under the influence of cultivation, and its out- crop is found to mark a poor strip of country between areas thaf: are rich. A NEW CASE OF MUTATION.* Fred. J. Hillig. The origin of two varieties of Commelina nudiflora L. by mutation has been observed by the waiter. The new varieties differ from the parent plant in the color of the sepals and sta- mens. The flowers of one variety are wdiite, of the other, pur- ple, while the color of the parent plant is blue. Minor differences have also been observed. The change was sudden and persisted through subsequent generations without a single exception. The group of individuals from which the mutated forms originated comprises about half a million plants and can be traced back for 12 generations. The white and purple varieties occur in Euro- pean gardens, but their origin from the l)lue variety had not been observed heretofore. Commelina nudiflora ])roduces a great number of other forms differing from the systematic species in many ways, such as size of plant, form of leaf, number of petals, etc. No eff'ort has as yet been made to decide whether these divergent forms remain constant. Prof. Hugo de Vries in a letter to the writer recommended a careful study of this valuable material. * Presented at the Cincinnati meeting, Ohio St. Acad, of Sci.. Dec. 1, 190.5. Jan., 1906,] Land and Fresh Water Mollusca. 449 A FEW GENERAL NOTES AND REMARKS WITH RESPECT TO THE LAND AND FRESH WATER MOLLUSCA.* V. Sterki. A friend of mine, lover and observer of nature, has told me repeatedly that "forty or fifty years ago, snails were plenty, large and beautiful; now you hardly ever see any." Even during the last 22 years (of my collecting), I have noticed a change for the worse. Several species and forms have disappeared at cer- tain places, or become scarcer. The same is true, probably, over most of the state. Owing to deforestation and culti- vation, the sheltering places have become more scarce and, what counts more, the atmosphere as well as the soil is less humid and is unsuitable for a large part of molluscan life. (It may be mentioned that the same man states that e. g. "huckleber- ries" have become scarcer and smaller.) Still worse is it with fresh water mollusca. Springs are disap- pearing, runs and creeks are dry during a large part of the summer, rivers come to their lowest stages, when sun-heat kills the animals even where still under a few inches of water, which in itself becomes of poor quality. At many places the banks are denuded of trees and undergrowth, and protection from shade is cut off. Another factor towards the same end, is the unrestricted discharge of all kinds of refuse and contamination from factories and towns into the rivers and creeks, doubly detrimental with low water. Mr. Geo. H. Clapp has stated, some years ago, that for eighty miles below Pittsburg, hardly a living mussel, or other mollusk could be found in the Ohio River. The same conditions I found at Wheeling: the bottom was covered with a muddy, ferruginous deposit; a very few dead mussel shells of depauperate form were found, but not a living animal or plant. Destruction of life in our "great and beatuiful river" will go on and on, if radical measures are not resorted to for " amendment." Some other rivers, or parts of them, are still in a better condi- tion, but almost everywhere the effects of the causes mentioned are noticeable and becoming more so from year to year. As an example on a smaller scale, I cite the eastern branch of the Tuscarawas river, running southeast to Warwick: it is a drearv, black, barren mud-ditch, in which no fish or other animal can live, owing to the refuse of factories, principally at Barberton. Students of other groups of animals have, no doubt, to tell the same tale, especially the ichthyologists. The wealth of fish which was in our rivers, and still might be in a large measure, is * Presented before the Cincinnati meeting, Ohio St. Acad, of Sci., Dec. 2, 1905. 45° The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. VI, No. 3, disappearing. And last, but not least, the influence on general health is a grave consideration. But to come back to mollusks. Of late years, the shell and pearl hunters have come, and killed our mussels, where there still were any, by the millions, in rivers and creeks. In many places they have been nearly exterminated, and only the naturalists deplore the fact. What can we do? When Hebra, the great dermatologist at the University of Vienna, presenting to his students a peculiar!}^ malignant case of a skin disease, asked the practicing student what could be done for the patient, and the young doctor could only shake his head and stand silent, "well, we will have him photographed," Professor Hebra would say. This is about our position. In the first place, we can record the fact, and deplore it. In the second place, we can take a careful inventory of what is still left. And that we should do, energetically: work up the muollsca in the rivers, creeks, springs, swamps, in the forests and copses left, and have them in our records and collections, for future generations to look at. In the third place, we might find some creek here or there, or part of such, preserve it in as natural conditions as possible, eventually with additional ponds, and try to preserve in it, and on its banks, such mollusks as are threatened with extermination. This sounds utterly fantastic ! and yet the time may come when such a plan may be considered. And in the fourth place, and above all, let us unite forces with government oflicials, and anybody who will try to put an end to the reckless deforestation of our land, and the reckless contamination of our waters with factory and city refuse. Already it is much too late, but still much can be accomplished. I believe it is not below the dignity of the Academy and its members to direct the^r attention to these eminently important tasks and to do all in their power to promote them. I know well that I go far beyond my scope with these last remarks, but these matters were so much no my mind that I could not help at least touching them, and I hope to be excused for doing so, even if the topic "mollusks" is only incidental to them. ADDITIONAL OBSERVATIONS ON SELF-PRUNING. John H. Schaffner. In 1901, Mr. Tyler and the writer published some notes, in The Ohio Naturalist, on the self-pruning habits of a consid- erable number of trees and shru1:)s. The list has been extended from time to time by the writer, the work being confined neces- sarily to the common woody plants of our region. It is gratify- Jan., 1906.] Meetings of the Biological Club. 45 ^ ing to note that one can occasionally find reference to this curious habit in the recent textbooks. There are few subjects better suited to arouse the interest and curiosity of the student. In 1903, 0. F. Cook described the striking self-pruning habit of the temporary and permanent branches of Castilla, the Central American rubber tree (Bull. No. 49, Bureau of Plant Industry, U. S. Dept. of Agr.) Plates X and XI are fine repre- sentations of self-pruned branches. Recently the writer was enabled to examine such branches brought by Prof. Hine from Guatemala. The development of temporary branches with a special arrangement for their removal is of unusual interest because of the economic value of these rubber trees. The following common trees and shrubs have also been studied for self-pruning: Acer pseudo-platantis L. Self-prunes small twigs and buds by means of a basal joint. Samhucus canadensis L. Unripe ends of the branches are pruned ofi bv cleavage planes developed in the upper leaf nodes. Sometimes the tips of all the branches of an individual are self-pruned, making a very peculiar appearance in the winter. Sambucus pubens Mx. Self-prunes in the same way as the preceding. Chionanthus virginica L. Self-prunes the leafy, fruiting panicles like the hackberry and choke cherry. Diospyros virginiana L. This tree has an imperfect method of self-pruning by which large numbers of small twigs are cut off. Lepargyraea canadensis (L.) Greene. Self-prunes small twigs by means of basal joints. Ulmus alata Mx. This tree produces cleavage planes in basal joints and in the annual nodes produced by the winter buds, like the white and cork elms. MEETINGS OF THE BIOLOGICAL CLUB. Orton Hall, Oct. 2, '05. The meeting was called to order by Pres. Hine. The minutes of the last meeting were read and approved. On the motion of Prof. Schaffner the president appointed Z. P. Metcalf secretary pro tem. Pres. Hine then appointed Prof. Hambleton, Miss Wilson and Miss Riddle as a committee to nominate officers for the ensuing year. As this was the first meeting of the year it was given over to reports by the members on their summer's work. Prof. Schaffner spent the major part of his summer in Kansas studying the Myxomycetes. Some time was spent on the oaks of eastern Kansas. Prof. Schaffner also reported the results of 452 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. VI, No. 3, his studies of the reduction division in the anthers of the Tiger Lily. Prof. Landacre gave some observations that he had made on the nesting habits of the common catfish. The main part of the summer was given over to a study of the development of the sense organs of the catfish, especially the taste buds. Mr. Griggs was at the Minnesota biological station on the southern coast of Vancouver's Island during the summer. Most of his time was spent in studying the Kelps of that region. Mr. Hyde assisted Prof. Bownocker in mapping the Pittsburg and Meigs Creek coals during the fore part of the summer. During the latter part of the summer he worked on the Logan and Black Hand formations about Lancaster. Miss Burr made a collecting trip through California. Miss Burr botanized especially on Mt. Lowe and the San Jacinto Mountains in Southern California. Mr. AA^illiam Moynan was elected to men'-bership. The club then adjourned. Ortox Hall, Nov. 6, 1905. The meeting was called to order by Pres. Hine. The minutes of the last meeting were read and approved. Prof. Hambleton, as chairman of the committee on nomina- tions of officers, reported the following names: President, Robert F. Griggs; Vice President, Opal I. Tillman; Secretary and Treasurer, Zeno P. Metcalf. On the motion of Prof. Osborn the report of the committee was adopted. Mr. Griggs then took the chair. On the motion of Prof. Osborn the Secretary was instructed to invite the Ohio State Academy of Science to hold its next meeting in Columbus. The President's annual address was given by Prof. Hine on the " Economic Value of the Mosquito." Prof. Hambleton reported the discovery of Puccinia mal- vacearum in an active growing condition as late as October 21st. Mr. Griggs reported his work on the material collected in the western United States. A new genus of Kelps has been estab- lished. The type specimen for the genus is also new. The genus 'is a primitive one and is interesting, therefore, from an evolutionary standpoint. Mr. C. W. McClure was elected to membership. The club then adjourned. Z. P. Metcalf, Secretary. Date of Publication of January Number, January IS, 1906. luj LIBR AitY The Ohio T^aturali PUBLISHED BY The Biological Club of the Ohio State University. Volume VI. FEBRUARY. 1906. No. 4. TABLE OF CONTENTS. Berger— Notes on the Fall Welnvorm (Hyphaiitria cuiiea) in Ohio 453 SCHAFFNER— Check List of Ohio Trees -157 Stekki— Note on List of Ohio Mollusca, ami a Suggestion in Regan! to Local Fannal Lists 462 MosELEY— The Cause of Trembles in Cattle, Sheep and Horses and of Milk-Sickuess in People 463 A State Natural History Survey 471 SCHAFFNER— Sexual and Nonsexual Geneiations 473 SUMSTINE— Note on Aiithurus borealis 474 Metca LP— Meeting of the Biological Club 474 NOTES ON THE FALL WEBWORM (HYPHANTRIA CUNEA) IN OHIO.* E. W. Berger. The majority of the observations upon which this paper is based were made at Cedar Point, Sandusky, Ohio, during the past summer while the writer was at the Lake Laboratory of the Ohio State University. The webs of this caterpillar were abundant on all sides and those who had spent preceding sum- mers at Cedar Point were under the impression that the Web- worm was on the increase. After a few days of casual observa- tion it was decided to make a more careful study of its habits, and, if possible, to determine whether it is double brooded at that place. While a few specimens pupated in the laboratory during the latter part of July, none of them transformed into adults, and no positive results were obtained in regard to a possible second l3rood. Acknowledgment is due Professor Osborn for his interest and generosity with valuable suggestions and facilities placed at the writer's command. Food Plants. — The worms were observed upon the following trees: Walnut (Juglans nigra L.), Choke-cherry {Prunus vir- giniana L.), Common Wild Black Cherry (Prunus serotina Ehr), Willow (Salix sp.). Elm {Ulmus americana L), Box-wood (Cornus fiorida L), Hackberry {Celtis occidentalis L), and Wild Grape * Abstract of paper read December 2. Cincinnati, Ohio State Acad, of Sci. 454 The Ohio Naturalist [Vol. VI, No. 4, (Vitis vulpina L). The webs were abundant everywhere upon the choke-cherry and the common wild black cherry, some trees of the latter kind having nearly half of their foliage destroyed. Willows were also nearly always populated by a few or many broods. The few walnut trees were literally defoliated, and this will be the subject of the next topic. Elm, box-wood and hackberry were frequently infested but never to the same extent as the previously named trees. In only two instances did I observe the worms feeding upon the wild grape, and then only when the grape leaves grew in among the leaves of willow and choke-cherry. I did not observe a single instance of the worms feeding upon the poplars at the Point. This is quite at variance with other observations in which poplars of all kinds were generallv mtich infested. Thus, in Riley's report upon the Web worm in Washington in 188G ("Our Shade Trees and Their Insect Defoliators") Populus balsamifera L) and P. trem- uloides Mx. are named among the trees that suffered most. Both these poplars occur at Cedar Point but no webs were observed upon them. Following I give the first five trees named in Riley's list of 108 food plants for Washington. These are arranged according to the damage suffered. Negundo aceroides Moench (Box Elder), Populus alba L (European White Poplar), P. monilijera Aiton (Cottonwood), P. balsamifera L (Balsam Poplar). The same report further states that poplars, cottonwoods and the ranker growing willows were the principal subjects of attack in 18SG in New England. Of the species of trees attacked at Cedar Point, four, walnut, wild black cherry, choke-cherry and willow appeared to be the favorite food of the worms, and these are respectively 41, 75 and 14, in Riley's list. (The common wild cherry is not named in his list, and its place among the above figures is indicated by a question mark.) Again, of all the species of plants named by Riley forty-two genera and about twenty-six species are found at Cedar Point ; but of these only eight were observed to be used as food by the worms. Throughout the State generally, so far as my limited observa- tions extend, and from a few other reports, the common wild black cherry is the tree most generally attacked; but walnut, elm, hickory, pear, apple, sugar and silver maple, all suffer more or less. Of these, walnuts, when attacked suffer most, as the following topic will show; and Mr. Cotton, Assistant Inspector of Orchards and Nurseries, has informed me of similar conditions in other parts of the State. The following observation is interesting as it vshows the dis- crimination with which the female moth selects the food plants upon which she deposits her eggs. One day I observed a web Feb., 1906.] Notes on the Fall Webwcrm in Ohio. 455 upon a hedge of osage orange, at Berea, Ohio. Closer investiga- tion, however, revealed the fact that the web was not upon the osage orange at all, but upon a small wild cherry tree that grew in the hedge and which had escaped my notice. Wahnit Trees. — Only a few walnut trees exist at the Point, but the worms played havoc with these, while of all the great abundance of choke-cherry, onl}" two instances were noted where the infection was at all so extensive. A clump of five walnut trees (each about six inches in diameter), became liter- ally defoliated and about 150 nests were counted upon them. I have observed, however, that the number of webs does not necessaril}^ indicate the number of broods, since a large brood may desert its old nest, and build a new one, or divide and form two new nests. (I use "nest" to distinguish the denser part of the web. See also Other Observations.) When food became scarce the worms began to migrate down the trunks of the trees, here and there covering the limbs and trunks with web. This migration occurred chiefly at night, the worms generally resting, as usual during the da}^ in temporar}^ webs frequently located at the base of the trees and of extraor- dinary size. In one instance I estimated that not less than two quarts of worms occupied a certain web. In the early part of the forenoon I usually found some strag- glers which had been overtaken by daylight, evidently en route from the trees. Many of these were found dead in small pits, from which, as experiment showed, they had been unable to extricate themselves, and had died from the excessive heat. The worms migrated mainly eastward to a clump of choke- cherry nearby and westward to a large hackberry about forty feet distant. This migration continued during about ten days. In four days the number of nests in the choke-cherry bush increased from six to twenty-five and the bush was literally stripped as the worms advanced. The migration to the hackberry was not so striking as that to the choke-cherry bush but even more interesting. At first the worms congregated in the crotches of the larger limbs but advanced upward from day to day and formed webs in the smaller branches. They soon began to strip the leaves and the webs could then be seen at some distance from the outside of the tree. Mr. W. B. Herms, who remained at the Laboratory until August 31st, was kind enough to observe the worms for me and reported that after my departure the worms migrated only a little farther east into the choke-cherry bushes and became fewer in number. I presume that they were then mature and that they wandered away to pupate. The trees began to show new life and by the time Mr. Herms left were quite green again. 456 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. VI, No. 4, A small hoptree {Ptelea trijoliata) immediately beneath the webs in the walnuts was injured but very little, the worms having a decided aversion for it. Feeding. — My observations in this direction clearly show that the worms feed but little if at all during the day. At night they leave the nests, or thicker parts of the webs, and move about freely. Some will even leave the protection of the thinner parts of the web and feed unprotected except by the darkness. (I do not mean to assert, however, that there were no threads of silk leading back from the worms to their web.) Growth and Moulting. — By actual measurement of worms in a certain brood I found that they increased in length about one- fourth of an inch in twenty-two davs, i. e., they increased in length from one-fourth to one-half inch. At that rate it would take about two months for a worm to mature, which appears to be about the time required at Cedar Point. The observations that I succeeded in making upon moulting give me twelve to fifteen days as the interval, the interval from birth to the first moult included. Allowing five moults per season, this would again give us about two months for a worm to become mature. Mature worms probably average from three-fourths to one inch in length. The heads moult first, the skin of the head drops off, and the worm then crawls out of the opening. The thorax rarely splits dorsally. Other Observations. — I have previously remarked that a brood may divide, each part building a new nest. This I actually observed in several instances. Again, two broods may unite into one brood or a brood may desert its old nest and build a new one. In one instance I cut out a nest while the worms were out feeding. Upon their return at daylight they wandered about aimlessly for a while, when one portion settled down and formed a new nest, while the rest returned to an empty nest nearby from which a ])art of the brood in question, a double brood, had come some days before. Of three nests cut out and placed upon the ground near some bushes, the worms of one nest were back upon the bush in a new web the morning of the second day, while those of the other two nests gradtially disappeared and apparently migrated to the bushes. The appreciable economic loss from the webworm is prob- ably not great, and but few trees are ever endangered; except small trees, which latter may easily become denuded of all their foliage by one or a few broods. Biological Hull, (). S. U... Columbus, December 5, 1905. Feb., 1906.] Check List of Ohio Trees. 457 CHECK LIST OF OHIO TREES. John H. Schaffner Ohio lies in the great deciduous forest region which extends from the Appalachian Mountains to the Mississippi River. This region was formerly one of the grandest woodland areas in the temperate zone. But the forest is rapidly disappearing before the civilization of the white man. In the list given below the introduced species have been marked by the abbreviation "I.", and those which are usually small or shrub-like by "S. T." In attempting to separate "trees" from the larger "shrubs," one must necessarily be some- what arbitrary, as nature draws no definite division line. A tree may be defined as a woody plant of any size which pro- duces naturally one main erect stem with a definite crown of branches; while a shrub is a woody plant which produces small, irregular or slanting steins usually in tufts. The species may develop in various ways depending on the environment. Thus the writer has seen individuals of the poison ivy (Rhus radicans L.) develop as climbers, shrubs, and small "trees" in an area only a few rods in extent, the conditions being favorable for all three modes of growth. In the present list, an attempt has been made to give the appropriate English name for each species. These have mosth' been taken from Sudworth's "Check List of the Forest Trees of the United States." Hybrids and mere forms have not been included. Of the 155 species listed as occurring in Ohio, 128 are native and 27 are introduced; about lOG are typical trees and 49 are small trees or shrub-like. Of the typical trees, 85 are native and 21 are introduced; and of those developing as small trees or shrubs, 43 are native and 6 are introduced. Subkingdom, CxYMNOSPERMAE. Class, CONIFER.\E. Order, Finales. Family- Pinaccae. 1. Pinus strobus L. White Pine. 2. " virginiana Mill. Scrub Pine. 3. " echinata Mill. Yellow Pine. 4. " rigida Mill. Pitch Pine. 5. Larix laricina (DuR.) Koch. Tamarack. 6. Tsuga canadensis (L.) Carr. Hemlock. Family, Ju >upcraccae. 7. Thuja occidentalis L. Arborvitae. 8. Juniperus communis L. Common Juniper. S. T. 9. " virginiana L. Red Juniper. 458 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. VI, No. 4, Subkingdom, ANGIOSPERMAE. Class, DICOTYLAE. Subclass, APETALAE. Order, Salicales. Family, Salicaccae. 10. Populus alba L. White Poplar. I. 11. " heterophylla L. Swamp Poplar. 12. " balsamifera L. Balsam Poplar. Also balsamifera candicans (Ait.) Gr. Balm-of-Gilead. 13. " dilatata Ait. Lombardy Poplar . I. 14. " deltoides Marsh. Cottonwood. 15. " grandidentata Mx. Largetooth Aspen. 16. " tremuloides Mx. American Aspen. 17. Salix nigra marsh. Black Willow. 18. " aiTivgdaloides And. Peachleaf Willow. 19. " lucida Muhl. Shining Willow S. T. 20. " pentandra L. Bav Willow. I. S. T. 21. " fragilis L. Crack Willow. I. 22. " alba L. White Willow. I. Also alba vitellina (L.) Koch. 23. " babvlonica L. Weeping Willow . I. 24. " fluviatilis Nutt. Sandbar Willow. S. T. 25. " discolor Muhl. Pussy Willow. S. T. Also discolor eriocephala (Mx.) And. 26. " bebbiana Sarg. Bebb Willow. S. T. 27. " purpurea L. "^ Purple Willow . I. S. T. Order, Juglandales. Family, Juglandaceae. 28. Juglans nigra L. Black Walnut. 29. " cinerea L. Butternut. 30. Hicoria minima (Marsh.) Britt. Bitternut (Hickory). 31. " ovata (Mill.) Britt. Shagbark (Hickory). 32. " laciniosa (Mx. f.) Sarg. Shellbark (Hickorv). 33. " alba (L.) Britt. Mockernut (Hickory). 34. " microcarpa (Nutt.) Britt. Small Pignut (Hickory). 35. " glabra (Mill.) Britt. Pignut (Hickory). Order, Fagales. Family, Bctidaceae. 36. Carpinus caroliniana Walt. Blue-beech. 37. Ostrya virginiana (Mill.) Willd. Ho]>hornbeam. 38. Betula populifolia Marsh. American White Birch. 39. " nigra L. River Birch. 40. " lenta L. Sweet Birch. 41. " lutea Mx. f. Yellow Birch. 42. Alnus incana (L.) Willd. Hoary Alder. S. T. 43. " rugosa (DuR.) Koch. Smooth Alder. S. T. Family, Fagaceae. 44. Fagus americana Sw. American Beech. 45. Castanea dentata (Marsh.) Borkh. Chestnut. 46. " pumila (L.) Mill. Chinquapin. S. T 47. Quercus rubra L. Red Oak. 48. " palustris DuR. Pin Oak. 49. " schneckii Britt. Schneck's Red Oak. 50. " coccinea Wang. Scarlet Oak. Feb., 1906.] Check List of Ohio Trees. 459 51. " velutina Lam. Quercitron Oak. 52. " nana (Marsh.) Sarg. Bear Oak. S. T. 53. " marylandica Muench. Black-jack (Oak.) 54. " imbricaria Mx. Shingle Oak. 55. " alba L. White Oak. 56. " minor (Marsh.) Sarg. Post Oak. S. T. 57. " macrccarpa Mx. Bur Oak. 58. " platanoides (Lam.) Sudw. Swamp White Oak. 59. " prinus L. Rock Chestnut Oak. 60. " acuminata (Mx.) Houd. Chestnut Oak. 61. " alexanderi Britt. Alexander's Chestnut Oak. 62. " prinoides Willd. Scrub Chestnut Oak. S. T. Order, Urticales. Family, Ulmaceae. 63. Ulmus americana L. White Elm. 64. " racemosa Thom. Cork Elm. 65. " fulva Mx. Slippery Elm. 66. Celtis occidentalis L. Common Hackberry. Family, Moraceae. 67. Morus rubra L. Red Mulberry- 68. " alba L. White Mulberry L 69. Toxylon pomiferum Raf. Osage-orange. I. 70. Broussonetia papyrifera (L.) Vent. Paper-mulberry. 1. Subclass, CHORIPETALAE. Order, Ranales. Family, Alaguoliaccae. 71. Magnoha acuminata L. Cucumber Magnolia. 72. Liriodendron tulipifera L. Tuliptree. Family, Anonaceae. 73. Asimina triloba (L.) Dun. Papaw. S. T. Family, Lauraceae. 74. Sassafras sassafras (L.) Karst. Sassafras. Order, Resales. Family, Hamamelidaccac. 75. Hamamehs virginiana L. Witch-hazel. S. T. 76. Liquidambar styraciflua L. Sweet-gum. Family, Platanaceae. 77. Platanus occidentalis L. Sycamore. Family, Rosaccae. Subfamily, Pomoideae. 78. Sorbus americana Marsh. American Mountain-ash. 79. " sambucifoha (C. & S.) Roem. Elderleaf Mountain-ash. 80. " aucuparia L. European Mountain-ash. L 81. Pyrus communis L. Pear. L 82. Malus angustifoha (Ait.) Mx. Narrowleaf Crab-apple. 83. " coronaria (L.) Mill. Fragrant Crab-apple. 84. " malus (L.) Britt. Common Apple. L 85. Amelanchier canadensis (L.) Medic. Common Juneberry. 86. " botryapium (L. f.) DC. Swamp Juneberry. S. T. 87. " rotundifolia (Mx.) Roem. Roundleaf Juneberry. S. T. 46o The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. VI, No. 4 88. Crataegus crus-galli L. Cockspur Hawthorn. S. T. 89. " punctata Jacq. Dotted Hawthorn. S. T. 90. " cordata (Mill,) Ait. Washington Hawthorn. 91. " oxyacantha L. English Hawthorn. I. S. T. 92. " coccinea L. vScarlet Hawthorn. S. T. 93. " rotundifolia (Ehrh.) Borck. Glandular Hawthorn. S. T. 94. " macracantha Lodd. Longspine Hawthorn. S. T. 95. " mollis (T. & G.) Scheele. ""Downy Hawthorn. S. T. 96. " tomentosa L. Pear Hawthorn. S. T. Subfamily, Drnpoideae. 97. Prunus americana Marsh. Wild Plum. S. T. 98. " angustifolia Marsh. Chickasaw Plum. I. 99. " cerasus L. Sour Cherry. I. 100. " avium L. vSweet Cherry. I. 101. " pennsvlvanica I^. f. Red Cherry. 102. " mahaleb L. Mahaleb Cherrv. I. S. T, 103. " virginiana E. Choke Cherry. S. T. 104. " serotina Ehrh. Black Cherry. 105. Amygdalus persica L. Peach. I. Family, Fahaceae. Subfamily, Casstoidcae. 106. Cercis canadensis E. Redbud. 107. Gleditsia triacanthos L. Honey-locu.st. 108. Gymnocladus dioica (E.) Koch. Coffee-bean. Subfamily, Papilionoideae. 109 Robinia pseudacacia E. Common Eocust. E 110. " viscosa Vent. Clam.my Eocust. E Order, Geraniales. Family, Rittaccae. 111. Xanthoxvlum americanum Mill. Pricklv-ash. S. T. 112. Ptelea tri'fohata E. Hoptree. S. T. Family, Simarubaceae. 113. Ailanthus glandulosa Desf. Tree-of-heaven. E to* Order, Sapindales. • Family, Anacardiaceae. 114. Rhus copallina E. Dwarf Sumac. S. T. 115. " hirta (E.) Sudw. wStaghorn Sumac. S. T. 116. " glabra E. Smooth Sumac. S. T. 117. " verni.x E. Poison Suinac. vS. T. 118. Cotinus cotinus (E.) European Smoketree. I. S. T. Family, llicaccae. 119. Ilex opaca Ait. American holly. S. T. Family, Celastraccac. 120. Euonymus atropurpureus Jacq. Wahoo. S. T. 121. " europaeus E. Spindle-trce. E S. T. Famih', Slaphylcaceae. 122. Staphylea Irifoliata E. American Bladdernut. S. T. Family, Accraccac. 123. Acer saccharinum E. Silver Maple. 124. • " rubrum E. Red Maple. 125. " saccharum Marsh. Sugar Ma])le. 126. " nigrum Mx. Black Maj^le. Feb., 1906.] Check List of Ohio Trees. 461 127. " pennsylvanicum L. Striped Maple. 128. " spicatuni Lam. Mountain Maple. S. T. 129. " negundo L. Boxelder. Family, Hippocastanaceae. . 130. Aesculus hippocastanum L. Horse-chestnut. I. 131. " glabra Willd. Ohio Buckeye. 132. " octandra Marsh. Yellow Buckeye. Also octandra hybrida (DC.) Sarg. Order, Rhamnales. Family, Rhainnaceae. 133. Rhamnus caroliniana Walt. Carolina Buckthorn. S. T. Order, Malvales. Family, Tiliaceae. 134. Tilia americana L. American Linden. 135. " heterophylla Vent. White Linden. Subclass, HETEROMERAE. Order, Ericales. Family, Ericaceae. 136. Rhododendron maximum L. Great Rhododendron. S. T. 137. Kalmia latifolia L. Mountain Kalmia. S. T. 138. Oxydendrum arboreum (L.) DC. vSorrel-tree. Order, Ebenales. Family, Ebenaceae. 139. Diospyros virginjana L. Persimmon. Subclass, SYMPETALAE HYPOGYNAE. Order, Gentianales. Family, Oleaceae. 140. Fraxinus americana L. White Ash. 141. " biltmoreana Bead. Biltmore Ash. 142. " lanceolata Borck. Green Ash. 143. " pennsylvanica Marsh. Red Ash. 144. " quadrangulata Mx. Blue Ash. 145. " nigra Marsh. Black Ash. 146. Chionanthus virginica L. Fringetree. S. T. Order, Polemoniales. Family, Bignoniaceae. 147. Catalpa catalpa (L.) Karst. Common' Catalpa. I. 148. " speciosa Warder. Hardy Catalpa. I. Subclass, SYMPETALAE EPIGYNAE. Order, Umbellales. Family, Araliaceae. 149. Aralia spinosa L. Angelica-tree. S. T. Family, Cornaceae. 150. Cornus florida L. Flowering Dogwood. 151. " asperifolia Mx. Roughleaf Dogwood. S. T. 152. " alternifoha L. f. Blue DogAvood. S. T. 153. Nyssa sylvatica Marsh. Tupelo. Order, Rubiales. Family, Caprifoliaceae. 154. Viburnum lentago L. Sheepberry. S. T. 155. " prunifolium L. Black Haw. S. T. 462 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. VI, No. 4, NOTE ON LIST OF OHIO MOLLUSCA, AND A SUGGESTION IN REGARD TO LOCAL FAUNAL LISTS. V. Sterki. A preliminary list of the Land and Fresh Water MoUusca of Ohio has been prepared by the writer and deposited in the Academy library. It is an abstract of a larger hand list, and contains nearly all the species seen froni the State, or recorded, except some of Pleurocera and Gonioleasis which still must be worked up specially. A few species listed must be verified as to actual occurrence in the State, a few others as to exact identifi- cation, and there is no doubt that quite a number of additional ones will be found. As stated elsewhere, I believe that "the Mollusca are the truest exponents of the geographical distribution of animals in a given region or district," and also that Ohio is a specially inter- esting territory in that respect. And therefore, a faunal list should not be published before the species, varieties and local forms from all parts of the State are fairly well know-n and their distribution can be shown by tables, charts, etc., approximately accurate, even if it take a few years' more work. Then, and only then, such a publication will be to the credit of the Academy and the State. If a part of a research fund could be turned over to the collecting and working up of our Mollusca, for a year or two, it would help considerably, and also might make it possible to work up a special "Ohio Collection" containing the species and local forms from various parts of the State, carefully identified, to be deposited with soine institution, e. g., the Ohio State Uni- versity. Local lists, also, might be worked up, of various parts of Ohio, where zoologists are studying the faunas. And in this connection a suggestion may be excused. Such a list, be it of Mollusca, or any other group of animals, or comprehensive, should not be confined to a county, except where the same is bounded by natural lines. Political outlines have nothing to do with the natural features of the county, but go across hills, valleys, rivers, etc. It is better to take up a certain naturally limited territory, a valley, a drainage system, a range or group of mount- ains or hills, regardless of county lines. The same might be said of States, to a large extent. ■ Yet, they comprise much larger territories, and for practical and routine reasons, will be considered separately, in general. Ohio is more naturally confined than most other States, and a faunal list of the State means somewhat of a unity. But even then, the lines should not be drawn too strictly. Feb., 1906.] The Cause of Trembles in Cattle. 463 THE CAUSE OF TREMBLES IN CATTLE, SHEEP AND HORSES AND OF MILK-SICKNESS IN PEOPLE.* E. L. MOSELEY. The mother of x^braham Lincohi died of milk-sickness. In many districts of the region extending from Michigan to Ten- nessee trembles and milk-sickness proved a veritable scourge to the earlv settlers. One of these districts was in northern Ohio in the western part of Erie and the eastern part of Sandusky County. Here forty-three persons are said to have died in a single year from this cause. Within the last thirty years Doctor Storey has treated nearly fifty cases in Townsend Township, which mav be half of the whole number. The loss of domestic animals from trembles in the three Townships, Townsend, Margaretta and Perkins, since the first settlement, doubtless exceeds five thousand. On some single farms the number is more than a hundred. People who came from Pennsylvania with a view to settling here returned to their own State on learning of the peril of pasturing animals in Ohio. To this day many woods in this district are not pastured, because animals would soon die if turned into them. Milk-sickness is known to be due to the use of milk, butter, cheese or meat of animals afflicted with the trembles, but what causes the trembles has not been well understood. It has long been known that only the animals allowed to run in the woods were affected, and experience showed that certain woods were very dangerous while others were safe. For a time many thought that the water was the cause of trembles but this idea was discarded long ago, as was also the hypothesis that the air of certain localities furnished the poison. Wm. Morrow Beach, of London, Ohio, in an article on Milk-Sickness in "Transactions of the Ohio Medical Society, 1S84," mentions "five separate and distinct classes of advocates as to the causes of the disease," but he seems to have settled on nothing more definite than that the animals contract it by "remaining in the timber over night." Dr. J. A. Kimmell, of Findlay, in an article read at the Inter- national Medical Congress, Berlin, 1890, mentions white snake- root among other things supposed to cause the disease but his own belief was that it was of bacterial origin. Dr. Robert Hessler, of Logansport, Indiana, at the meeting of the Indiana Academy of Science, Dec. 1, 1905, exhibited drawings of an apparently new species of yeast he had found in the blood of a horse that had the trembles, and presumed to be the cause. Professor N. S. Townshend was convinced that white snake-root caused the trembles and his articles in the Ohio Agricultural *Read at the Cincinnati meeting of the Ohio St. Acad, of Sci., Dec. 2, 1905. 4^4 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. Vl, No. 4, Reports for 1858 and 1873 gave evidence to support this view, including a letter from W. J. Vermilya of Ashland County, who in 1856 had produced trembles and death of a mare by feeding her this weed, also a statement that Mr. John Rowe had fed it to cattle in Madison County, 1839, with the same fatal results. W. C. Mills informs me that Professor Townshend and some of his pupils intended to experiment in feeding this weed. The principal objection to Professor Townshend's view appears to have been that white snake-root grows where animals have been pastured for many years without a single case of trembles and this seemed a serious objection to the theory. The Eupatoriums are not palatable. Anyone who has tasted boneset will admit that this is true of Eupatorium per- foliatum. In the South I have observed that animals leave Eupatorium serotinum tmtouched even where they have been confined so as to eat almost every other green thing in reach. In northern Ohio I have found Eupatorium ageratoides, the white snake-root, growing abundantly in a number of woods where animals were pastured but no sign of their having eaten it. But if the pasture becomes poor, some are likely to eat it. On the 8th of last October I visited a piece of woods in Sandusky County where there was nothing fit for an animal to eat, the principal herbs being nettle, white snake-root, poke and black nightshade, w4th some clearweed, basil, and bedstraw. Every plant of snake-root had been nipped off so that I did not see one more than about half the normal height. This had probably been done by cattle from the adjoining pasture which were doubtless accustomed to spend a portion of hot sunny days in the shade of the woods. A few weeks before my visit a man and his wife who had been using butter made from milk of cows in this pasture had milk-sickness and the wife died. Elisha Haff, Townsend Township, Sandusky County, did not think trembles were due to any weed, until he found that western sheep which he turned in his woods ate the white snake-root and died of trembles. Sheep whose ancestors had long been in the region did not eat it and did not have trembles. Since that he has been destroying the weed. James Fuller in the same township, in 1874, turned sheep into woods when the ground was covered with snow and all they had to eat was this weed. They contracted the trembles and forty of them died. George Sanford in the same township in January, 1881, lost a horse which could get nothing but snake- root in the woods. He tracked it and saw where it had eaten this weed. A number of dogs from the neighborhood fed on the carcass and all died of the trembles. Mr. H. H. Lockwood of Sandusk}^, was the first to describe to me the plant which caused trembles and milk-sickness. His Feb., 1906.] The Cause of Trembles in Cattle. 465 ancestors settled on the peninsula north of Sandusky Bay in 1812. For many years trembles occurred among the stock. He believes that from their own observation they concluded it was caused by their eating snake-root which they would do only in a dry season when the pasture was poor. About 1872 Mr. David Barber in Margaretta Township, when he was hauling wood with a sleigh, left the gate open into the woods. Sheep got in and, though they were there hardly more than two hours, a number had trembles and some died. The snake-root was the principal plant in these woods. Mr. Barber did not notice that they ate it but supposed at the time that they were poisoned by something they found by pawing through the snow. These woods were notorious for the great number of horses, cattle and sheep which contracted the trembles in them. Mr. Barber told me that he had noticed this weed was abundant wherever trembles prevailed. I had already found this true of the woods I had examined. In 1904 Louis Quinn had twenty-seven steers pastured in a large woods in Townsend. All had the trembles and nine died. The woods were known to be dangerous and so Mr. Quinn has been accustomed to leave stock there no later than June 1st. This time he left them about a week longer and had more of them than usual so that they were harder pressed for food. In these woods I found white snake-root more abundant than anv other dicotyl. I saw thousands of them in a walk of a few min- utes while plants fit to eat were scarce. Nearly all the woods in that part of the township are considered unsafe and are pastured only early in the season if at all. In woods near Mr. Quinn's six lambs died of trembles this year. White snake-root was found abundant in all the woods examined in that region with one notable exception. In the woods of Orlando Ransom I could not find a single specimen, though a boy who was assist- ing me found one. June grass was growing in every part. Mr. Ransom told me the woods had been pastured for the past fifty years and no trembles had occurred. I also learned from sev- eral sources that trembles were unknown west of Pickerel Creek which is three miles west of Quinn's woods. I examined woods just east of this creek, but found no snake-root and learned that the}^ were pastured with impunity. West of the creek I could find no snake-root in the first two woods examined, in the third after walking nearly a quarter of a mile I found four or five plants, in the fourth none, and in the fifth many in one place and a few others scattered about. EARLY EXPERIMENTS IN FEEDING THE WEED. About 1843 John Palmer Deyo, "a scientific investigator and prominent physician," living near Bellevue fed white snake-root 466 fAe Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. VI, No. 4, to a calf which in consequence had the trembles and died. Mrs. S. M. Thomson, a niece of Mrs. Deyo who is still living, remem- bers that Dr. Deyo took pains to investigate the matter thor- oughly at a time when people held conflicting views regarding the cause of trembles and was gratified when his efforts resulted in convincing them that white snake-root was the cause. She thinks that instead of feeding the weed directly to a calf, he fed it to a cow thereby producing trembles in both cow and calf and the death of the latter. Dr. Cowell, a veterinary physician living near Bloomingville, Erie County, boiled the white snake-root in milk and gave the milk to pigs which soon died of the trembles. He asked another physician, "What ails those pigs?" "Trembles," was the reply. Then he told what he had fed them. Dr. John Ray who lived at Whitmore, Sandusky County, steeped white snake-root and fed it to a calf which as a result died of the trembles. I have been told of each of the three cases mentioned above by two old residents, who knew the experimenters personally and all six of my informants are reliable, though of course, they may be in error as to some of the details. There is no doubt that the weed experimented with was the white snake-root and that the experimenters were fully convinced that it was the cause of the trembles. Mr. William Ramsdell of Bloomingville informs me that about 1842 when there was so much discussion of the subject the boys of the neighborhood used to assemble evenings at the old lime-kiln southeast of Castalia and experiment on dogs. They would boil or steep the white snake-root and putting the extract in milk give it to the dogs, in which it would induce the trembles; a large number were killed in this way. Some one ex[)erimented on sheep with the same result. He informs me also that a Mr. Redmond (who did not believe that the weed was the cause of trembles) chewed some of the weed and died after suffering for about four weeks. About 1S40 Thomas James of Bloomingville caused a calf to die of trembles by feeding it a weed he brought from the woods, which from the description given me by his daughter and also by Isaac Jarrett, I concluded was white snake-root. Dr. Carpenter of Castalia, and B. F. Dwelle of Ottawa County, also experimented in feeding this weed and were con- vinced that it was the cause of the trembles. RECENT EXPERIMENTS. Cats. No. 1. On November 2{)th my pupil, Oscar Kubach, using snake-root I had recently gathered, broke uj) the stems and Feb., 1906.] The Cause of Trevibles in Cattle. 467 leaves of two plants (possibly 3 or 4?) and soaked them over night in abcut a pint of milk, of which he gave about a gill at about 9 A. M. to his tom-cat. The cat took about one-half of it. "About 9:30 it seemed to take effect and he tried very hard to vomit but could not. He took long, deep breaths. He was quiet and wanted to sleep very hard. All of a sudden he would tremble very hard, then again very little. A watery fluid pasccd from his eyes and mouth. He chose a spot in the sun and when driven away walked back in a staggering manner. He had no appetite. His senses seemed to be duller, as he did not care for anything. He went to sleep about 10:30 but did not sleep sound. He seemed to be in an unconscious state for the rest of the day. The next morning about 10:30 he walked about three rods and there died about noon." Oscar lives in the country and I did not see the cat until he brought it to me dead. Weight estimated 4)4 pounds. Post- mortem examination by Dr. H. C. Schoepfle and myself showed no lesion, inflammation, congestion or unnatural appearance of any organ. Brain not examined. Death followed more quickly in this case than in any of our other experiments. The cat was not fed the evening before giving the poisoned milk, so that digestion was probably rapid. As it was not taken from home and so was not kept in confinement, the case is especially interesting. No. 2. A female kitten weighing after death thirty ounces, had probably never been handled by anyone until caught for this experiment. My pupil, Alton Fuchs, cut up about half a pound of snake-root I had gathered and boiled it about an hour in a quart of water. When the water had become reduced to a syrupy liquid, about one tablespoonful in volume, it was poured into the throat of the cat and the outside of the throat tickled so that it was all swallowed. "Soon after the decoction was administered the cat acted as if she wanted to vomit but did not vomit at any time. When first turned loose in room of barn it was very active, but after half an hour seemed rather stupid. x\fter an hour she escaped, but was caught while trying to get through a fence, being less active than before poisoning." I first saw her aVjout 2)- 2 hours after extract was given, lying in natural position, eyes directed toward us, but rather dull, took notice of anything held near but indisposed to move. Respirations 38 and 30 per minute, doubtless increased by our presence. Movement of the back seemed greater than in normal breathing, and occasionally a spasmodic contraction ran along the muscles of the back. About noon the next day she took some milk. The symptoms continued much the same as the previous day, the spasms more frequent and pronounced, becoming worse in the 468 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. VI, No. 4, evening, when at times two or three in close succession made a sort of trembling. Much duller than the evening before but would still move, if driven. At 8 the next morning she shook all over, her head moving from side to side and the spasms continuing. At some of our visits that day we did not see real trembling. She took some milk and could still climb but showed weakness. At 5 P. M. the breathing was slow and barely discernible. The next morning, Nov. 29, she had taken some milk containing extract of snake- root that had been boiled l^i hours. Breathing deep but of normal rate — about 21 per minute. No trembling until after she was made to exercise. At 11:40 A. M. more trembling and violent paroxysms. At 12:30 Alton held her by the nape of the neck with her back resting in his other hand so that the legs were free. They quivered rapidly, continually and very plainly, the trembling being intensified by bending the legs with the hand. At 3:40 on being held the same way, trembling did not show at first but soon became plain in one hind leg and then in both. Rectal temperature 101^, the same also on Dec. 4, when the legs would still tremble somewhat but the eyes were normal, appetite good and she was active and restless. She had become tame and even familiar. No extract had been offered Nov. 30th and after that she would take no milk with it in, though her appetite was good. When held up some trembling could be seen, mostly in hind legs, as late as Dec. 7th, though in other respects she seemed well. She disappeared for a time and after her return showed no more trembling or effect of the poison except that she was entirely tame. She had at no time been given any of the snake-root except thoroughly boiled extract. Dec. 14. The same cat was brought to me for further experiments. She showed no trembling or anything abnormal, took milk readily. The next morning I offered her milk in which snake-root had soaked. She would not drink it although it had been warmed and it was left with her about two hours. At 10 o'clock I gave her the heart, lungs, neck and back of thoracic region of a rabbit which had weighed 24 ounces and had died of trembles. She began eating it at once. At 11:30 she had eaten all and apparently wanted more. At 4:15 she seemed eager for food but would not take milk in which snake-root had been soaked, but ate the meat offered — half of liver, part of abdominal muscle and head of same rabbit. No trembling that day, but not examined after 4:15. At 8:10 the next morning when lifted by nape of neck, hind legs trembled strongly and on a second trial, the right fore leg also (and the left a little?). When let out of box she found remains of the rabbit up on a window sill and ate part of the stomach which was filled with snake-root and parts of other Feb., 1906.] The Cause of Trembles in Cattle. 469 viscera, including some liver, and might have eaten much more, if permitted. At 9 A. M. still trembled, but not so much; at 10:45 could see no trembling; at 4 P. M. very little trembling when held up until after exercise when it was plain. Dec. 17, temperature at 9:10 A. M.. 103°, at 3:30 P. M., 103.2°. Tremb- ling; at 9:10, none; at 10 o'clock, after considerable exercise, hind legs trembled and after drinking milk (she would take none with snake-root in it) , the hind legs and right front leg trembled strongly when she was held up; at 3:30 trembling mostly in left hind leg and that not till she had been held some seconds. She continued active and appetite good. Killed Dec. 17, but not examined until Dec. 26, w^hen the only abnormal appearance was a general venous engorgement (likely due to the CS,, which killed her?). The experiments with this cat proved that trem- bles could be produced by thoroughly boiled extract of snake- root. The later experiments showed that she would no longer take milk containing the poison but would take meat greedily, also that this meat brought on the trembling again, but her first experience appeared to have effected some degree of toler- ance of the poison, for she was not so strongly affected as a larger cat which ate a smaller quantity of meat from the same rabbit. This was No. 3. A female cat, weight about 3^4 pounds; was fed like No. 2 with meat from rabbit, No. 6. A hind leg was given at 8 A. M., Dec. 14, but at 3:40 P. M. had not been eaten. At 7:50 the next morning she had taken this and some good milk. A fore leg and side were put in, but had not been eaten at 10 o'clock. At 4:10 P. M. the larger part had been eaten. No trembling that day. At 5:50 P. M. left her half of liver. Of this piece about one-third remained the next morning and was given to No. 2, which had eaten other half of liver. After being out of box a few minutes she returned voluntarilv. Then, for the first time I could feel trembling and on holding her up could see strong trembling of hind legs. 9 A. M., trembled some; at 10:45 did not tremble, had not eaten much of the meat left earlier, drank good cold milk and a few minutes later, when I held her up she trembled so that I could feel it and see it in her legs, three or four of them; 4 P. M., trembled some and, after a very little exercise, strongly. On putting her on window sill, 3rd floor, and letting her look out, trembling was quite notice- able even without holding up. After being let free on the floor a little while trembling was very strong; apparently indisposed to exercise. When returned to box began eating rabbit. Dec. 17, 8:50 A. M., rabbit meat consumed except large intestine containing snake-root She seemed no worse ; respira- tions 40 and 36 per minute, doubtless increased by fear; temper- ature at 9:45 A. M., lOl:'?^"; trembling that day no greater than 470 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. VI, No. 4, preceding. Dec. IS, less trembling than before. At 4 P. M. put in the whole of rabbit No. 7 of which we had made post mortem examination. She began eating it at once. Though the rabbit weighed 24 ounces she had at 8 o'clock the next morning eaten the greater part and seemed satisfied after such a hearty meal. All day she seemed to feel good and did not usually tremble except after exercise or drinking cold milk, when the trembling was very strong. More active than previously, had ceased to show much fear. The next morning she had taken the rest of the meat, the parts remaining being the skull, hind leg bones, considerable of the skin and the large intestine containing snake-root. She seemed no worse. Next day, Dec. 21st, 7:20 A. M., no trembling till after some exercise; temperature 102.9°. At 4:40 P. M. no trembling could be seen. She seemed entirely well. I began to wonder if eating second rabbit would have any effect. That day I offered her milk in which snake-root had been soaked but she took very little of it. Dec. 22nd, she seemed pretty well and was put in a shed from which she escaped and I did not expect to see her again,, nor care, as I had seen no reason to suppose she would show anything more of interest. She was not gone long, however, but adopted the shed for her home, spending most of the time in a basket with a flannel cloth in the bottom and paper under the handle partly covering her and helping to keep her warm. She evidently had not got rid of the rabbit and it was making her trouble. Constipation, though not complete, seemed to continue as long as she lived. The hind legs were spread apart more and more each day. She was allowed to go and come as she pleased and for a number of days I thought she would recover. On Dec. 28, she caught sight of a rabbit I had left on the grass and started to rush at it, being restrained with difficulty. Meat and milk were kept by her much of the time but she took little or nothing except water and a little cooked potato at any time after Dec. 22nd. Dec. 30, she had been going about so much that I thought she was nearly well, but at 4:30 I found her temperature 103.9°, buttocks soiled, odor very bad. When held up by nape, hind legs trembled. After this I think she did not leave the shed but grew weaker, sometimes trembled when held up, at other times not. Jan. 2nd, she seemed too weak to tremVjle, had barely energy enough to crawl back into basket when put down near it. At 12:30 I noticed paroxysms of muscles about the shoulders. At 4 o'clock she seemed nearly dead, no struggling but quiet. At 5 she was getting cold. The next afternoon I opened the abdominal cavity and found two ounces or more of a perfectly clear amber colored liquid of slight acid reaction. No inflammation or congestion. (To be continued.) Feb., 1906.] A State Natural History Survey. 47 ^ A STATE NATURAL HISTORY SURVEY. At the Cincinnati meeting of the State Academy of Science the President in his annual address urged the effort to secure state support for a natural history survey. The Academy adopted a resolution endorsing the project and providing for a committee of three, to consist of the retiring President, the incoming President and the Secretary, to draft a bill and endeavor to secure its passage during the coming session of the General Assembly. As a result of the efforts of this Committee a bill has been introduced by Hon. C. V. Trott of Mt. Vernon. This bill, after providing in the first Section for the establishment of the Survey, appointment of the Director by the Governor and authority to appoint necessary specialists and assistants, states in Sections 2 to 4 the objects of the survey as follows : " Section 2. The Survey shall have for its objects: (1) An examination of the animal and plant life of the state with special reference to its distribution, abundance, increase or decrease^ and facts of practical or scientific importance as a foundation for accurate instruction in the schools of the state. In particular shall facts relating to the organic purity of water supplies, the food supply of fishes, the game birds and animals, and forms affecting public health be considered. (2) The identification of birds, fishes, and other animals or plants sent in for the purpose by officers of the Fish and Game Commission, State Board of Health, City Boards of Health, or other State, County or munic- ipal bodies calling for such inforination, or by the general public so far as they may be of public interest or value, and as the time of the officers may permit. Such investigations as may be especially desired by the State Board of Health in connection with the water supplies or the disease-producing or transmitting^ forms of life, or the Fish and Game Commission or other State Bureaus for the purpose of their work shall be given preference and pushed with all possible speed consistent with careful work.. (3) The preparation of special reports with necessarv illustra- tions and maps which shall embody both a general and a detailed description of the work of the survey. Sec. .3. The collections made in pursuance of this act shall be deposited at the Ohio State University and shall be available for study by any person properly qualified, under such regu- lations made by officers of the Survey, as may be necessary for the permanent preservation and use of the collections. Sec. 4. The Survey may from any duplicate material in its collections furnish sets to such colleges, museums, high schools, or township schools of the state as may be willing to pay the cost 472 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. VI, No. 4, of labelling and transporting such specimens, and furnish evi- dence that' such collections will be duly preserved and made available for the use of students and others interested. Pref- erence is to be given in order of application to high schools offer- ing courses in Nature Study, Zoology or Botany, and so located that no other collections of a similar nature are available for study and demonstration." The Sections following (5 to 8) provide for publication which is on the same plan as the Geological Survey, for compensation of officers, expenses and accounting, and provides an annual appropriation of $5000 for carrying on the work. It is believed by the Committee and others consulted that the bill would give an opportunity to push a much needed study of our native fauna and flora and it should meet the hearty sup- port of all interested in the Natural History of the State as well as the members of the Academy. Letters endorsing the measure to be effective, should be sent as promptly as possible to indi- vidual members of the House or Senate or to Hon. C. V. Trott, House of Representatives, Capitol Building, Columbus, Ohio. While an argument for the Survey seems altogether unnec- essary for readers of the Naturalist, a statement of some of the hnes of study especially needed may be useful. It is particularly desirable that there should be a careful, systematic study of the Fauna and Flora, pushed as rapidly as possible to determine the present status and for comparison during future years. Such a scientific foundation is needed in many lines of study or practical work but perhaps from the standpoint of general knowledge would serve its greatest purpose as a help to teachers of Natural Science in the various schools. It will have all the greater service in this connection if these same teachers can have a hand in the work of the survey and in the distribution and use of the collections resulting from its work. A full knowledge of the aquatic life of the waters of the state is of direct and essential importance in matters of health and in the development of the fishing interests; moreover, the depletion or extinction of such life by sewage and factory waste that pollute our lakes and streams has economic as well as scientific interest. The bill already has received approval and hearty endorse- ment from the presidents of a number of Ohio colleges and universities and of individuals acquainted with the need for such a survev. It is House Bill No. 363. H. 0. Feb., 1906.] Sexual and Nonsexual Generations. 473 SEXUAL AND NONSEXUAL GENERATIONS. John H. Schaffner. Recently a number of ideas have been put forward bv various authors as to what is a sexual or nonsexual individual or generation. To the writer the case seems to be a matter of definition. The confusion appears to arise not so much in a misapprehension of the facts involved as in the extension of the meaning of the terms used. But in this case individuals and gen- erations should be judged by what they produce. A sexual generation is a gamete-producing generation. Any individual, therefore, producing cells which normally are to conjugate possesses sexuality provided the conjugation results in reproduction. If there is a differentiation of sex, the indi- vidual which produces female gametes directly is a female indi- vidual, and the individual which produces male gametes directly is a male individual. The gametes or male and female cells may be produced with or without a preceding reduction division, for the sexual generation may be either an " .v" or a " 2.v " generation. A nonsexual generation is a spore-producing generation, the spores being non-conjugating reproductive cells. The non- sexual generation may also be either an ".v" or a "2x" genera- tion. Sex terms are, of course, not to be applied to nonsexual generations or individuals. An alteration of generations may be antithetic having an ".r" gametophyte and a "2a'" sporophyte. And certainh' the generation which produces the sexual cells is to be called the sexual generation and the one producing the nonsexual spores the nonsexual generation. So in the higher as well as in the lower plants the gametophyte is the sexual generation and the sporophyte the nonsexual. An alternation of generations need not be antithetic. But both generations mav have the ".v" number of chromosomes. In such forms as Oedogonium and Coleochaete, for intsance, where the 2.r number of chromosomes appears to be only in the zygote, the organism coming through reduction from the zygote is still the sporophyte and nonsexual generation for the reason that it finally produces nonsexual spores. It is possible that there are "2.v," sporophyte genera- tions producing their spores without reduction which would then occur before the formation of the gametes and we would then have an alternation of generations with a "2.v-" gameto- phyte and a "2a;" sporophyte. Here again the gametoph3"te is the sexual and the sporophyte the nonsexual generation. In other words, sexual and nonsexual individuals or gametophytes and sporophytes are not determined by an ;v number or a 2.r number of chromosomes but by the fact that the first produce gametes and the second nonsexual spores. 474 ^^^ Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. VI, No. 4, NOTE ON ANTHURUS BOREALIS. D. R. SUMSTINE. Of the six species of Anthurus only one is known from the United States, Anthurus borealis. This species was described bv E. A. Burt in 1894. (Mem. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist. 3:504.) It was reported by him from New York and Massachusetts. I have not seen it reported from any other place since and conse- quently this note may add another station for this interesting fungus. During the summer William Marshall collected for me some fungi growing in the vicinity of Ravenna, Ohio. Among these was a specimen of this plant. Clare Jennings of Olena, Ohio, also sent some fungi to the Carnegie Museum and in the collection were several specimens of Antlmrus borealis. The plants agree well with Burt's description. Some of the plants had only five arms, others had six. The specimens are all in the herbarium of the Carnegie Museum, Pittsburg. Wilkinsburg, Pa., Jan. 2, 1906. MEETING OF THE BIOLOGICAL CLUB. Orton Hall, Dec. 4, '05. The Club was called to order by the President, Mr. Griggs. The minutes of the last meeting were read and approved. The major paper of the evening was by Dr. C. B. Morrey on "Some Pathogenic Protozoa." Dr. Morrey reviewed briefly the known species of parasitic Protozoa and gave notes on their habits, occurrence, distribution and life histories in general. Parasitic Protozoa occur mainly as internal parasites of animals, only one form being known to occur on plants. Parasitic Protozoa are classified as beneficial, nonpathogenic and pathogenic. Nearly all the orders of Protozoa have representatives among the parasites, but they are especially abvmdant among the Sporozoa. Professors Osborn and Landacre gave brief reports of the Zoological Papers presented at the Cincinnati Meeting of the Ohio State Academy of Science. Professor Schaft'ner reported on the Botanical Papers presented at the same meeting. The following persons were elected to membership: Edna McCleery, Edith Hyde, Mary A. DeCamp, H. S. Hammond, E. W. Berger, Oscar Himebaugh, W. B. Herms, R. L. Shields, J. G. Wittenmver, C. R. Stauft'er, F. B. Grosvenor, E. I. Lichti, W. E. Evans, G. D. Hubbard, A. C. Workman, C. F. Jackson and Mrs. C. F. Jackson. The club then adjourned. Z. P. Metcalf, Secretary. Date of Publication of February Number, February IS, 1906. ne Ohio ^JS^aturalist, PUBLISHED BY The Biological Club of the Ohio State Uni