•^^'o. >^'^^*»' '*%. UNIVERSITY or PITTSBURGH S F 4 ^1 Darlington JVl.einorial J_/ibrary ^ «*•* OKNAMENTAL DOMESTIC POULTEY. ORNAMENTAL DOMESTIC POULTRY: HISTORY AND MANAGEMENT. The Rev. EDMUND SAUL DIXON, M.A., EECTOR OF INTWOOD-WITH-KESWICK, NOEFOLE. REPRINTED FROM THE " gardeners' CHRONICLE AND AGRICULTURAL GAZETTE,' WITH ADDITIONS. SECOND EDITION, REVISED AND ENLARGED. PUBLISHED AT THE OFFICE OF THE "GARDENERS' CHRONICLE," 5, UPPER WELLINGTON STREET, COVENT GARDEN, LONDON. LO?!DON: EEADBUET AND KVAXS.PBIXI , WBITKFKIAKS. THE MEMORY OF THE FAITHFUL WIFE, DURING WHOSE BRIEF COMPANIONSHIP ON EARTH THESE ESSAYS WERE COMMENCED ; THEY ARE NOW, IN THEIR AMENDED FORM, WITH DEEP SORROW INSCRIBED, BY THE AUTHOR. Epops. — " Epopoi ! popopoi ! popoi ! popoi ! Flock hither, flock hither, flock hither, HiUoah! Hilloah! All ye of like feather. Wherever ye he, "Whether barley ye gather, Or seed on the lea; With a skip and a bound. And a song of sweet sound. Flock ye hither to me. Ye that twitter the clod around, Tio, tio, tic, tio, tio, tio, tio, tic, Or in ivy-bush dwell 'Mid gardens ; in mountain or dell ; Who dip the beak, or who brush the wing, In reedy pool, or in plashy spring ; On berries of wilding-olive feed, Or strip off the arbute's scarlet seed. Come along, come along To the voice of my song, Trioto, trioto, tiioto, tobrins ; Or on wide fenny flats, Flitting after the gnats, When they 're twanging their horn, Snap them up ; or at mom, Where the dew lies, are seen Glancing over the green Of sweet Marathon's mead ; And with pinion so bright. Hazel-hen, hazel-hen •, Or whose tribes take a flight On the tumbling sea-billow, Where the king-fishers pillow, Come hither and hear. What news we have here ; For all our tribes are gathering, Fowls of evei-y plume and wing : And there is amongst us brought An elder shrewd of subtle thought. That plans new counsels for our state. Come all, and aid the deep debate: Hither, hither, hither." Cary^s Birds of Aristophanes, Act I. PREFACE TO THE EIRST EDITION. The history of the present volume is very simple, and, it may he, runs parallel with that of many other works on higher subjects. The Author, with his Wife (now removed from worldly trouble), and his Child, were living in a small suburban house, that had a little back-gar- den attached to it. As a harmless amusement they procured a few Fowls to keep, although totally ignorant of their ways and doings. In aid of this ignorance books were procured — to little purpose. The difficulty of obtaining instruction from others led to closer observa- tion on our own part, and a more eager grasp at the required knowledge. By degrees, a few water-fowl were added to the collection ; but the only watering-places on the spot were tubs and milk-pans. A neighbour, how- ever, obligingly permitted the flock of strange fowl to be driven to a small pond, a few score yards ofi". They throve, and duly increased ; but still little help was to be had from books. Encyclopaedias, though in them the Natural History department is almost always well executed, were little satisfactory. " Anser, see Goose ;" " Goose, VIU PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION. see Anser," is scarcely an exaggeration of what often fell out. Several current Poultry-books were purchased, which proved to be compilations of matter, valuable indeed in the hands of an editor practically acquainted with his subject ; but these works are full of errors, grossly evident even to learners, and of contradictions that must strike any attentive reader, even though he had never seen a feathered creature in his life. But a student is sometimes the best teacher of any branch of knowledge, as far as he has himself advanced in it, because he has a fresh recollection of the questions which gave him the most trouble to solve ; and therefore notes were made, mentally, and on paper, from time to time. It was afterwards encouragingly suggested that the publication of them might be ventured upon, as being possibly acceptable to people requiring such information. They were offered to the editor of the Gardeners^ Chro- nicle, readily accepted, favourably received by the readers of that valuable paper — a class of persons whose good opinion I must think it an honour to have obtained — and the reader now holds in his hands the entire results of my present experience in that department of Natural History, in addition to what has been already published in the Agricultural Gazette. It is hoped that the need of some attempt of the kind, from some quarter, will conciliate a lenient criticism of the many errors and deficiencies with which the Author may doubtless be chargeable, whatever pains he may have taken to guard against them. Poultry has been too much undervalued as a means of PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION. IX study and a field of observation. Insignificant, and to us valueless wild animals, brought from a distance, about whose history and habits we can learn little or nothing, are received with respectful attention by men of educa- tion and ability, are embalmed in spirits, treasured in museums, and pourtrayed by artists ; but a class of crea- tures inferior to few on the face of the earth in beauty, useful, companionable, of great value in an economical point of view, are disregarded and disdained. It is pos- sible that any one claiming to be considered as an edu- cated gentleman, may be thought to have done a bold thing in publishing a book on Poultry, and giving his real name on the title page. Moubray, who has written per- haps the best modern treatise on the subject, only ven- tured to meet the pubhc criticism under the shelter of an assumed title. But some very important speculations respecting organic life, and the history of the animated races now inhabiting this planet, are closely connected with the creatures we retain in Domestication, and can scarcely be studied so well in any other field. Poultry, living under our very roof, and by the rapid succession of their generations, afi'ording a sufficient number of instances for even the short life of man to g-ive time to take some cofrnisance of their progressive succession, — Poultry aftbrd the best possible subjects for observing the transmission or inter- ruption of hereditary forms and instincts. I shall, no doubt, at the first glance, be pronounced rash, as soon as I am perceived to quit the plain task of X PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION, observing, for the more adventurous one of speculating upon what I have observed. I can only say that the conclusion to which I have arrived respecting what is called the " origin " of our domestic races, has been, to my own mind, irresistible, having begun the investigation with a bias towards what I must call the wild theory, although so fashionable of late, that our tame breeds or varieties are the result of cross breeding between undo- mesticated animals, fertile inter se. It will be found, I imagine, on strict inquiry, that the most careful breeding will only fix and make prominent certain peculiar features or points that are observed in certain families of the same aboriginal species, or sub-species, — no more: and that the whole world might be challenged to bring evidence (such as would be admitted in an English court of justice) that any permanent intermediate variety of bird or animal, that would continue to reproduce offspring like itself, and not reverting to either original type, have been originated by the crossing of any two wild species. Very numerous instances of the failure of such experimental attempts might be adduced. The difficulty under which science labours in pursuing this inquiry, is much increased by the mystery in which almost all breeders have involved their proceedings, even if they have not purposely misled those who have endeavoured to trace the means employed. As to the great question of the Immutability of Species, so closely allied to the investigation of the different varieties of Poultry, as far as my own limited researches have gone — and they have been confined almost entirely to Birds under the influence of man — they have led me PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION. XI to the conclusion that even siib-species and varieties are much more permanent, independent, and ancient, than is currently believed at the present day. This result has been to me unavoidable, as well as unexpected ; for, as above mentioned, I started with a great idea of the powerful transmuting influence of time, changed climate, and increased food. My present conviction is that the diversities which we see in even the most nearly allied species of birds, are not produced by any such influences, nor by hybridisation ; but that each distinct species, how- ever nearly resembling any other, has been produced by a Creative Power : I am even disposed to adopt this view towards many forms that are usually considered as mere varieties. As far as I have been able to ascertain facts, hybrids that are fertile are even then saved from being posterityless (to coin a word) only by their progeny rapidly reverting to the type of one parent or the other : so that no intermediate race is founded. Things very soon go on as they went before, or they cease to go on at all. This is the case with varieties also, and is well known to breeders as one of the most inflexible difficulties they have to contend with, called by them "crying back." This circumstance first led me to suspect the permanence and antiquity of varieties, and even of what are called "improvements" and "new breeds." Half of the mongrels that one sees are only transition-forms, passing back to the type of one or other original progenitor. At least, my own eye can detect such to be frequently the apparent fact in the case of Domestic Fowls. Any analogies from plants must be cautiously applied to animals ; but even in the vegetable kingdom the number XU PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION. and reproductive power of hybrids is apparently greater than it really is, owing to the facility of propagation by extension, by which means a perfectly sterile individual can be multiplied and kept in existence for many hundred years ; whereas a half-bred bird or animal would, in a short time, disappear, and leave no trace. I have not met with one authenticated fact of the race of Pheasants having been really and permanently incorporated with Fowls, so as to originate a mixed race capable of con- tinuation with itself; but with many that prove the exti'eme improbability of such a thing happening. The vulgar notions, that Hens kept at the sides of plantations therefore become the mothers of half-bred chickens, by whom Pheasant blood is again transmitted to their pro- geny ; and that Hens, whose plumage in some measure resembles that of the Cock Pheasant, are therefore hybrid individuals — are too vague to be listened to, in the absence of clearer evidence, which is not yet forthcoming. But it will not be easy to eradicate this prejudice from the popular mind. Mr. Darwin's discovery, the result of his great industry and experience, that " the reproductive system seems far more sensitive to any changes in external conditions, than any other part of the living CBConomy," confirms my suspicion of the extreme improbability of the origination of any permanent, intermediate, reproductive breed by hybridising. It would thus seem, that so far as those organs are not much changed from their normal condition in one or other parent, (which we may suppose shown by the fact of their producing young resembling, not themselves, but their oiyn parents,) they are fertile; but, when so changed as to be incapable of producing PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION. XIU such young, tliey do not produce at all. At least, this is the way in which I must interpret the fact. The dissection of a fertile hybrid, and the comparison of its reproductive system with that of either parent, might throw light upon the question ; but it would be a nice undertaking. Mr. Darwin suggests, " If you ever had it in your power fairly to test the possible fertility of the half-and-half birds inter se, I certainly think you would confer a real service on Natural History." I have there- fore proposed to myself to test the fertility of various half- bred Geese, one with another, avoiding as far as possible near relations, and confining myself to that genus espe- cially, because almost any species of Goose will breed with any other. Geese, therefore, give greater promise of instructive if not successful experiments by the inter- marriage of hybrids, than any other bird with which we are acquainted. If my suspicion be correct, that many varieties of Fowls (and perhaps of Dogs) are aboriginal, and not the results of Domestication, the mere fertility of hybrids (partial or complete) must cease to be a test between species and varieties. That, however, is a question of words, rather than of things. It may be observed that a sufficient number of lusus and hybrids have been produced, in the course of ages, to stock the world with an infinite variety of forms, had not that class of heterogeneous beings been in themselves of an unprolific and transitory nature. But the number of existing forms is diminishing instead of increasing. It is not too much to say, that if the history of the world goes on as it now does, every fifty years, for some time to come, will witness the extermination of XIV PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION. at least one species of creature from the face of tlie globe. The reader will perceive that a description has been given, in most cases, of the newly-hatched chicks of each species of Poultry. The idea of doing this was suggested hy an inquiry, which had for its object to ascertain the amount of differences in the very young of our supposed domestic races, compared with the dif- ference of the mature animals, in relation to the general belief that, in youth, species differ very little from each other ; it being really the fact that the embryos, of even distinct orders, are closely and fundamentally alike each other. But if these embryotic similarities between birds and any other class of creatures be sought for, the time of the exclusion of the chick from the egg is far too late in its existence to look for them. Observant persons, who have themselves been practically engaged in the rearing of Poultry, will immediately recognise the newly- hatched chick of each variety with which they are acquainted. Nay, when an egg has been accidentally broken after a fortnight's incubation, I have myself been able to decide of what breed it would have been, had it survived. I believe that a comparison of the newly- hatched young of all wild birds would lead to the like result. The only chance of finding any such analogies, or rather confusion, would be obtained by examining the embryos of birds, reptiles, and fishes, two or three days after the hatching of the ovum had commenced. But it is now time to say a few words on matters of more general interest. PEEFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION. XV As regards the money profits derived from Poultry, I have been reproached with confining myself to general statements, with avoiding details, abstaining from figures, and checking enterprise by mere assertions. But I had rather receive the praise of having deterred one sanguine speculator from obtaining an uncertain profit, than incur the blame of having urged twenty bold adventurers to a certainly unprofitable outlay. In consequence of recent discoveries and new modes of management, we are to have companies formed for the production of poultry on a grand scale ! When the apparatus is got together, and the capital .expended, and it is found that, after all, the chickens cannot be reared, except by twos and threes, instead of by scores and hundreds, the bubble must burst, like thousands of others ; meanwhile, we, pro- phets of evil, premise that the more densely poultry are congregated, the less profitable will they be : the more thickly they are crowded, the less wiU they thrive. Could I put together in figures a statement of great profits that would satisfy my own mind, and that T could honestly recommend as a guide to others, I would most gladly undertake so agreeable a task. Many of the debtor and creditor accounts of Fowl-keeping that have been published, will not bear close examination by those acquainted with the minutiae of the matter. It is not supposed that such accounts are put forth with a wilful intention to deceive ; but they are no more to be relied on, for practical purposes, than would a ship- owner's account of his herring-fishing, if it made no allowance for an occasional bad catch, the loss of a boat, or a set of nets worth 1001. ; to say nothing of XVI PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION. wear and tear, and the widows of drowned fishermen to assist. Nothing is so likely as specious detail to mislead those whose experience is insufficient to detect its incompleteness, not to say its error. Thus, one writer (in the Agricultural Gazette, Sept. 23, 1848) tells us, that by adopting the regimen advised by one good Mrs. Doyley, Hens may be made to sit four times in the season. Each time they sit, they are to hatch two broods, by the withdrawal of the first clutch of chickens, and the replacing them with fresh eggs. The kidnapped chicks are to be reared by an artificial mother ; we are told how. If the Hen hatches only ten chickens from each set of eggs (which is considered a low estimate) this gives eighty chickens per annum from each Hen. Let us work the scheme out a little further. If one Hen will produce eighty chickens, for the expense of maintaining five hens, (and, we suppose, a Cock, though he, poor fel- low, is not mentioned), we get four hundred chickens in the course of the year, or more than one a day upon our table. Who would not keep five Hens, and even submit to the additional cost of a Cock, if necessary ? But, alas ! if we reckon, eight sittings of three weeks each amount to twenty-four weeks, or nearly half the year. Now the Hen that incubated twenty-four weeks in one twelvemonth, and hatched only fifty chicks during the same period, would deserve a gold medal and a pension for life from the Royal Agricultural Society. Hens are made of flesh and blood, not of wood, hot water, iron, and mackintosh. Whenever I have over- tasked the incubating powers of Hens, they have invariably PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION. XVll suiFered for it afterwards : it has taken tliem the whole autumn, and perhaps the winter also, to recover their health. One fine Dorking Hen, who had been over-worked in this way, never sat afterwards, and laid but indifferently, though we kept her for the two following summers. Another gentleman, having read somewhere that certain Cochin China Fowls attain great weights, and that the Hens lay two, sometimes three, eggs a day, declares his intention of speculating in the purchase of a large number of them, with the hope of eventually forming a Poultry Company, without knowing either how old these very heavy Fowls were, if they existed, and without making sure that these feats of laying were ever performed, except upon paper. These are the sort of details which I certainly am cruel enough to cast cold water upon, and disrespectful enough to treat with ridicule. But the Reader has listened long enough to this prse- ludium ; we will strike the final chords, which sound harmoniously to our own ears. Thanks are the burden of our closing song. Without great help, this volume, though small, could not have been written at all ; without great encouragement the writer would certainly not have ventured to send it forth. It is scarcely possible to mention by name all the persons to whom he is indebted for hints, and answers to inquiries. The addition of initials to many paragraphs is an attempt to avoid some part of the reproach of strutting in borrowed plumes ; they will also perhaps serve as props to sustain his own otherwise tottering edifice : but it would be an b XVIU PKEFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION. ungrateful omission not to mention specially the obli- gations under which the Author feels himself bound to the Editors of The Gardeners^ Chronicle and the Agricultural Gazette. Cringlefoed Hall, Norwich, October, 1848. PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITiqN. The Prefaces to the First and Second Edition of any Book are written under very different feelings and cir- cumstances. In the one case an Author is on the eve of submitting his labours to the tribunal of criticism, not always good-natured or impartial ; in the other, he has passed the ordeal, surviving the several cuts and burns that may have been inflicted upon him ; that best Censor of the Press, the British Public, has stamped the ap- proving Imprimatur upon his fly-leaf ; he may then be allowed to rejoice and congratulate himself, if he do but cherish, as he ought, due gratitude to those who held out a helping hand while the success of his venture was yet uncertain ; for he may at length calculate upon the votes of those who wait to hear what opinion others shall pro- nounce, as well as of those who have the courage and intelligence to think for themselves. Exclusive of the fact that a large impression has already been disposed of, this Edition, it may be hoped, will meet with a favourable reception, from having been carefully revised throughout, and enlarged with additional b 2 XX PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION. matter to the full extent that the space allowed by the Publisher would permit. The opportunity of attending the Great Birmingham Show of Cattle, Sheep, Swine and Poultry, at which the Author had the honour to be selected to act as one of the Judges, enabled him to make a careful inspection and comparison of those breeds of Fowls whose nomenclature and arrangement were most confused ; and by the kind and able assistance, both previoHsly and since, rendered by the Gentlemen con- nected with the management of that important Meeting, it may be said, without vain boasting, that a fuller ac- count is given of the Domestic Fowl, as at present kept in England, than is to be found in any other treatise on Poultry. The original passages from Greek and Latin authors have been omitted, and translations only retained, with references. In such cases where the Translator's name is not given, the writer of the volume is responsible for them. The learned reader will make allowance for any errors he may suspect, by remembering that middle- age latinity is often ungrammatical, and Greek prose obscure. The addition of an Index much increases the practical utility of the work. As to the theoretical views pro- pounded, the Author is not vain or confident enough to say that he has hit upon the truth point-blank ; but he sincerely believes that his limited attempts to explore the labyrinthine subject of Domesticated Birds have been made in the right direction ; and abler and more ex- perienced persons than himself are beginning to think PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION. XXI 60 too. A Sequel Volume, to comprise the history and habits of many birds not mentioned in this, may perhaps one day show what additional light a wider survey of species throws upon this interesting and really important subject. For the point at issue is no less than this ; whether Man, as he floats down the current of time, has the power of greatly modifying the natures of the humble fellow-creatures that are borne on alongside with him (although he has not the power of modifying him- self— " which of us by taking thought can add one cubit unto our stature?") ; also whether gradual and progressive changes are, by some innate self-acting power of Nature, constantly taking place in animated beings, so as to render Natural History an eternal series of phantas- magoric, perpetually-dissolving views ; — or, whether such notions are not greatly exaggerated ; whether this progressive system of Creation be not the result both of a false inference from correct data, and of a true infer- ence from incorrect data ; whether a Higher Power than either Man or a mechanical worldspring of Nature, have not originated, and do not maintain, the course of things which we see around us. A great argument is, that the earth we now inhabit has contained successive races of plants and animals, differing from those now existinfj, which have succes- sively ceased to exist, and have been replaced by others, till the present order of organic life began. True ; it is 60 ; it has been so. Therefore, say they, fir?;t came the semi-animate polypus, from that grew the articulate worm, from that the fish, from that the reptile, from that the XXU PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION. quadruped, from that the monkey, from that the race which reasons about, and bears dominion over all, — the race of Man. From sundry of these, or their interme- diate progressive forms, branched off, at various epochs, the insect and the bird, aquatic, terrestrial, and aerial. But Man is not the final ruler of the world ; from him, by some fortunate conjunction, will proceed a still supe- rior race, as the law of the series is to continue advancing in perfection. The views alluded to may thus be not fully nor pre- cisely, but are certainly not unfairly stated.* They are * Lest the reader should doubt that such doctrines really can find advocates, a late specimen shall be given from the Annals and Magazine of Natural History for January, 1850, p. 10. Mr. W. Clark, one of the Contributors, " became fully convinced that the foot, (of one of the boring Molluscse) having finally performed its terebrating functions, the animal, consequently, having arrived at its full growth, had become absorbed ; on the well-known principle, that an organ from want of use is often, especially in the lower animals, followed by its total disappearance This phenomenon stamps with additional consideration the Lamarckian doctrine of the progres- sion and advancement of animality resulting from a want requiring to be supplied, which is effected by the concentration of the whole mass of vital energies, the circulation, nervous influences, aided by caloric, the gases, electricity, &c., in forcing and producing the supply of the particular want. That great philosopher instances the addition of tentacula to the Helices in explanation of his views ; and this doctrine is strongly corroborated, if the fact of the obliteration of the foot in Pholadidea papyracea is considered, e contrario, as a retrocession in animalisation. This phenomenon also proves that nature never per- manently retains what is superfluous, or refuses, as far as its power extends, to supply urgent requirements. " This important proof of the soundness of the laws promulgated by M. Lamarck, that nature mechanically produces the progressive march of animal improvement, almost makes us incline to assent to PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION. XXllI plausible, attractive from their simplicity, and have some true and many false facts to support them. Bict, ■we want the evidence that the changes which have taken place in the vegetable and animal inhabitants of the earth have been gradual and self-originated ; there is much to the contrary, showing that they have been vio- lent and convulsive, — works of the fire, the earthquake, and the deluge. For the re-creation of the chaos, for the refilling of the void of life, for the re-peopling of the desert, there is but one Power that we can look to, and that must be an Omnipotent Intelligence. In the exist- ing oi'der of things a gradual extinction of certain species is going on, but no reconstruction that we can perceive, no modification except within prescribed and impassable limits. The more rigorously the steps of the construction of these assumed new forms are demanded, the more do they fail to stand the gaze of inquiry. And if an ad- vance of an inch span cannot, under scrutiny, be made to afford a firm footing for the progressive theory, how shall the scientific speculators on the self-born origin of created things be allowed to stride from mountain-top to the high and metaphj'sical researches of that great naturalist, that the doctrine is not without foundation, that the first sparks of vitality arise from gravitation and molecular adherence, aided by the gases put in action by caloric, electricity, &c." [We would respectfully decline following our correspondent in these speculations. — R. T.] " //" loe adopt this view, we admit that the genn of vitality communicated to matter arises from the mechanical poiver intrusted to nature ; but" [then what meaningless words are these !] " we must not for a moment forget that nature can do no more than perform the high behests of the Deity, nor exceed those limits of action confided to her by the Great Ruler of the universe, who is the ens entium, and the first cause of all that exists." XXIV PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION. mountain-top? It is here that such humble pursuits as the present Volume is intended to illustrate, are the in- struments wherewith to shackle the wings of reckless and over-daring fancy. For instance, a great deal is huilt upon the notion of producing a new species by the intermingling of two old ones, and so one mode of recon- structing a fresh Fauna is indicated ; which let those believe who have great credulity and little practical ex- perience. The result of what the Author has heard, and seen, and tried, leads to quite a contrary conclusion. It is well credited that certain Fowls owe their origin (their creation, in short, as the French writers express it) to the coupling of Pheasants with barn-door Hens : the notion is an absurdity, as, it is to be hoped, is shown in the proper place. Socialism may answer with the hu- man race ; it certainly is not the natural order of things in the Class Aves. But many people are still anxious ioY further experiments, and urge them to be made, — a request that should be complied with were patience and simple good-nature inexhaustible : but let the chemical amateur think how he would act, were a grave professor to desire him to institute a new set of experiments with the object of discovering the philosopher's stone, or potable gold, the elixir of life ! A hybrid can sometimes be obtained in such cases ; but what of that ? It is the permanent intermediate progeny which is required by the progressionists. The usual result of such unnatural crosses amongst birds is male offspring only, females being rare ; the principle of life in the female embryo produced by a forced union, seems too feeble to advance into actual existence. When the parents of the hybrid PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION. XXV are of widely separated species, these males are as good as sure to be sterile, and grow large and fat, like Capons, or barren Cows and Hinds. But not here alone is the progressive theory at a stand-still. Certain stars called nebulae, beheld with the best telescopes, have an ill-defined cloudy look ; others are less and less so, till we arrive at the perfect, point-like, glittering star, or cluster of stars, shining like diamonds in the sky. Hence it has been concluded that these groups of suns are in a state of transition, passing from a vapoury chaos of inconceivable heat into the coolness, arrangement, and order of our own system. But, to the destruction of these etherial castles. Lord Rosse builds a telescope of unprecedented power, and those cloudy stars, the imagined chaotic burning nebulae, are beheld as groups of gold-dust, each grain a sun, doubtless with its attendant worlds. Again ; an car of Wheat is plucked in the fact of transmuting itself into Oats. (See Gardeners^ Chronicle, October 6, 1849). Dr. Lindley dissects the ear, and finds that the unhappy kernel which had caused the me- tamorphosis, and from which so many wonderful conclu- sions were to be drawn, was simply an entanglement during growth of one head of corn accidentally brushing against its neifihbour. Mr. Baily, dwelling in the heart of the London fashion- able world, has Fowls sent him to prove what unnatural vagaries Pheasants will play, for the sake of establishing XXVa PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION. Oil earth a novel form of bird ; but the novelties are old friends of the experienced poulterer, and can be matched any day from Holland, or Lancashire, or from places where Pheasants, in the life, have not been seen for years. And in this way, not the finger of the Creator, but the vestiges of created things, are attempted to be tracked without fault or check ! In these reasonings, as observed in the first Preface, reliance is too apt to be placed on inapplicable analogies drawn from experiments in hybridising plants. Corporal Trim said, " We are not stocks and stones ; " Birds will exclaim, "We are not vegetables and shrubs." For, rejecting the many ways of propagating a new plant by extension, i. e., by cuttings, grafts, suckers, ofi'sets, (fcc. — and we cannot make a cutting, graft, or layer of a hybrid Hen — we must remember that every seedling, except in the limited case of dioecious plants, is a prolific hermaphrodite, instead of an incapable male. But even that grand favourable circumstance is often unavailing to perpetuate the novelty &y seed, as the writer was once astonished to discover when he had raised a new cab- bage and took great pains to continue it "true;" but alas ! the new cabbage disappeared like a shadow, leaving representatives of one only of its parents, the sturdy Savoy. The agency which climate is made to exert in the transmutation of species, is here dismissed by referring the reader to the White Peacock and the Rumpless Fowl. To deny that animals vary at all, in either a PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION. XXVU wild or a domesticated state, is of course erroneous, and would, in fact, go to the extent of denying all individuality; but a strong suspicion may be reasonably entertained that such variations occur in prescribed cycles, and within certain limits, backwards and forwards, for which there exists a law, if we could but find it out, and that there is no progression or transmutation out of one species into another ; just as, if the comparison be allowed, the Moon has her librations, and though a slight variation takes place, we see, upon the whole, the same disk ; or, as the orbits of the planets, though liable to perturbation, still do not deviate far from their general track, nor strike off into open space. If this limitation of variation in animals were either proved or disproved, it would be a strong argument either one way or the other. In searching after the original condition of existing forms, it may be suspected that the circumstance of finding various series of forms has been made to prove much more than it ought to be allowed to prove. Laplace's comparison of the nebulas, in what are supposed progres- sive stages of forwardness, to the trees of different ages growing in a forest, has always struck the writer as assuming: too much.* If what is said of Lord Rosse's * " From absolute vagueness, to distinct structure, and then on to the formation of a defined central nucleus, the nebula seems growing under our eye ! The illustration of Laplace, reproduced by Mr. Airy, here forcibly occurs to me : ' We look among these objects as among the trees of a forest : their change in the duration of a glance is undiscoverable ; yet we perceive that there are plants in all different stages ; we see that these stages are probably related to each other in XXVlll PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION. telescope be true, and that the nebulge are likely to prove all resolvable with improved instruments, and not to be in different stages of growth, which we can prove, the simile fails, and we see how little trust we ought to put in this interpretation of a series, namely, that any one individual form must have passed in succession through those which are nearest below it in the chain. The minds of children are too acute to reason in this way. No little girl, surveying a toy-shop, would take the six- penny doll that is offered to her to be the juvenile state of the shilling one that she covets. A truer comparison the order of time, and we are irresistibly led to the conclusion, that the vegetable world in one case, and the sidereal world in the other, exhibit, at one instant, a succession of changes requiring time, which the life of man, or the duration of a solar sj'stem, may not be suffi- cient to trace out in individual instances.' And the progression advances until it is complete." — Nichols' Architecture of the Heavens. Ath Edition, f. 133. " Of course, when I speak of progress, I shall be understood to signify progress as seen through a series of related contemporaneous objects in different and connected states — not that progi'ess which has never been observed — the passing, viz., of one nebula from an inferior into a higher condition. But is the conclusion rash, that this latter progress is possible .'' Is it not darkly, but impressively intimated by the unbroken integrity of the series ? Wliat principle of philosophy hinders the supposition, that each of these varying (various ?) bodies holds with those on both sides of it also the relations of progenitor and descendant, that the unbroken contemporaneous series is also a picture of youth, ripening, and manhood — in short, that the principle of attraction has actually brought such distinct round nebulae as are seen clustering together, and also collections of stars imbedded near each other on a whitish light, from the bosom of masses like those looming elsewhere — still all indefinitely — among the masses of the firmament?" Idem, p. 130. A more eloquent begging of the question it would be difficult to adduce. PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION. XXIX of the varied appearance of the nebulse may be, that such a series resembles not the assemblage of young and old trees of the same species in a forest, (which we see, and are told by our forefathers, change their proportions from the seedling to the stag-headed timber tree), but a herbarium, containing a classified collection of all the jylants in the same forest, from the mould-fungus to the oak, arranged each in its proper place in the series, but by no means losing its character for permanence, in con- sequence of that arrangement. If the nebular theory falls to the ground (as we may assume it has fallen), will not the arguments for gradually-progressive physical organic changes in other departments of nature, and which are mainly supported by the analogy of the nebula as the first grand step in Creation, — will not those arguments be greatly weakened by Lord Rosse's resolution of many hitherto unyielding nebulse ? The only apology that is offered for this tedious preamble, is that it seemed desirable to show that what may be called crotchets have not been entertained with- out some shadow of reason. An abler writer than the present, with equal practical study, could easily make the ground taken far more tenable. It may be difficult to explain all points connected with his position in the argument, but the advocates of progression are defied to prove the accuracy of theirs, minutely, and step by step. Let them carry out their theory ; let them use synthesis as a test of their analysis ; let them make us a new species, by combination strictly evidenced, not by impor- tation, nor by a constant interdashiug of foreign blood. XXX PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION. This will have a far more convincing effect than to go on working laboriously at mere hypotheses, and requiring the opposing counsel to bear the burthen of proving a negative. Cringleford, February, 1850. CONTENTS. PAOB Pea Fowl 1 Mute Swan, (Cygnus Olou) .15 Turkey 34 Canada Goose 53 Egyptian or Cape Goose (Chenalopex Egyptiacus) . Gl Musk (commonly Muscovy) Duck 66 Guinea Fowl 77 China Goose (Cysnoides) 88 White-Fronted or Laughing Goose 96 WlGEON 103 Teal 109 White China Goose 115 Tame Duck 124 Domestic Goose 142 Bernicle Goose 156 Brent Goose 161 Eggs 164 Domestic Fowl 187 Rearing and Management of Fowls . . . . 224 Classification of Fowls 2G7 XXXXl CONTENTS. PAGE Spanish Fowl .... . . 271 Dorkings . 279 Cochin-China Fowl 289 Malay Fowl 299 Pheasant Malay Fowl . . . . . . 304 Game Fowl 316 Hamburgh Fowls ... .... 342 Cuckoo Fowl 355 Blue Dun Fowl 357 Lark Crested Fowl 361 Poland or Polish Fowl 364 Bantam Fowls 375 EuMPLESs Fowl, or Rumkin . .... 387 Silky and Negro Fowls 391 Frizzled or Fbiesland Fowl . ... 394 ORNAMENTAL POULTRY. PEA-FOWL. " Were it known, tliat a paradise or a liumming-bird could be seen alive in an)' of our zoological gardens, — birds which, however beautiful, sink into insignificance before this, — half London would flock to see them ; nay, if one of those monstrous abortions — a double-headed chicken, which we have more than oiice read of — could have been fed and reared, the owner would have made his fortune ! Thus does curiositv, in minds essentially vulgar, predominate over the lasting sense of beauty ; and the glories of the visible heavens, no less than the splendours of the peacock, are passed with indifference by unreflecting millions, because both are every-day sights." — SwaInson. So charming is the perfect combination of grace and splendour displayed by these most lovely creatures, so excellent is their flesh, so hardy are they in their adult state, that, were it not for certain inconveniences attendant upon keeping them, and also, perhaps, for the indifference with which everything not rare is apt to be regarded by us, they would be sought after as never- tiring objects wherewith to gratify the sense of sight. Who does not remember the thrill of delight with which, in childhood, he first gazed upon their brilliant gorgeous- ness ? Peacocks and gold fill our youthful imaginations as fit elements of the magnificence of Solomon ; and no fable more fitly chose its decorations than that which attached these feathered gems, in association with the many- coloured Iris, to the train of imperial Juno. Even 2 PEA-FOWL. the hen of the Pea-fowl, though sober in her colouring, is most harmoniously shaded, and every movement is coincident with the line of beauty. The causes which disincline many persons from indulging themselves with the daily spectacle of this inapproachable model of beauty, are, in the first place, the depredations that it commits upon gardens. For this there is no help. The dislike which these birds have to enter a fowl-house, and their decided determination to roost on trees or lofty buildings, prevents our exercising a control which should restrain them from mischief till an eye can be kept upon their movements. At the first dawn, or at the most unsuspected moments, they will steal off to their work of plunder. With great conve- niences for keeping them in their proper places, T wsls compelled to choose between the alternative of banishing a very perfect and familiar pair, or of depriving my children of strawberries. A friend, who has been well acquainted with their habits for years, informs me, as the result of his experience, that their cunning is such, that, if frequently driven away from the garden at any par- ticular hour of the day or evening, after a certain time they will never be found there at that special hour, but will invariably make their inroads at daybreak. As a last resource I have tried ejecting them with every mark of scorn and insult, such as harsh words, the cracking of whips, and the throwing of harmless brooms. Most domestic animals, and I believe many birds, are sensitive of disrespectful usage, and would feel as a severe rebuke the manner in which they were thus turned out. But Pea-fowl are incorrigible marauders. A mansion, therefore, whose fruit and vegetable garden is at a distance, is almost the only place where they can be kept without daily vexation. The injury they do to flowers is comparatively trifling ; though, like the Guinea- fowl, they are great eaters of buds, cutting them out from the axillcE of leaves as cleanly as a surgeon's dissecting- knife would. They must also have a dusting-hole, which PEA-FOWL. 3 is large and unsightly ; but this can be provided for them in some out-of-the-way nook ; and by feeding and encou- ragement they will soon be taught to dispose themselves into a tableau vivant, at whatever point of view the tasteful eye may deem desirable. No one with a very limited range should attempt to keep them at all, unless confined in an aviary. But, where they can be kept at large, they should be collected in considerable numbers, that their dazzhng effect may be as impressive as possible. Many gardenless castles and country-houses on the Continent would lose their semi-barbarous and semi-ruinous appearance, by employing these birds as an embellishment. For they are not less pleasing to the eye than the Stork, which is so much encouraged ; and they would render in great measure the same services, namely, the destruction of small reptiles, with the advantage of remaining at home all the year round. Willughby gives a ludicrous quotation from Johannes Faber in reference to the serjaent- eating propensities of the Pea-fowl, which is too coarse, both in idea and expression, for modern republication, though not otherwise objectionable. Some- thing of the kind is popularly believed, perhaps not utterly without truth, respecting Herons and eels. But to these Continental residences it should be understood that no vineyard be at hand. The greenness and sourness of the grapes, which caused the Fox to refrain, would be but a weak argument with them. A Peacock that was suffered to go at large in the dirty back lanes of a town struck me as being more out of its place than any I had ever seen. A charming instance of the ornamental use of Pea-fowl was to be seen a dozen years ago (and perhaps may still) at the Palace of Caserta, near Naples. There is an English garden,* admirably laid out, on a slope com- manding the most enchanting views. In one part is a small piece of water, in the midst of which is an island planted with trees and shrubs, and inhabited by numerous * The gravel for some of the walks was brought fiom Kensington. B 2 4 PEA-FOWL. Pea-fowl.* Of course they must be pinioned, to prevent their escape. My own birds had no hesitation in flying to and fro, in order to visit an island similarly situated, and which is cultivated as a kitchen-garden. People may talk about Humming-birds, Sun-birds, Birds of Paradise, or any other feathered beauty, but nothing can equal the magnificence of a Peacock in full flight, sweep- ing across a sheet of water, or glancing in the sunbeams among the topmost branches of a fir-tree. A second objection to them is their alleged wanton destructiveness towards the young of other poultry,t a propensity respecting which I have heard and read | such contradictoiy statements, that they can only be reconciled by the hypothesis that the Peacock becomes more cruel as he advances in life, and also that males of this species vary in disposition ; that, as the human race has pro- * " Therefore this genus of fowls is most easily kept in the small woody islands which lie before Italy. For since they can neither fly very high nor for a long distance, and since there is no fear of loss by thieves or vermin, they can safely go at large without a keeper, and find themselves the greater part of their food. The Peahens, indeed, as if freed from slavery, will of their own accord feed their young with greater care ; nor should their keeper do more than call the flock toward the farm at a certain time of the day by a known signal, and throw them a little barley as they assemble, so that the birds may not be famished, and their number may be told. But the opportunity of using this kind of landed property is rare." — Columella, lib. viii. cap. xi. This is very like our pheasantries in alder and osier carrs. The whole chapter is curious and worth reading. "f* Columella gives a fanciful reason for keeping Hens that have families of chickens from coming near Peahens that have broods, which relieves the latter at least from all blame. " Authors are suffi- ciently agreed that other Hens, which are rearing young of their oyra kind, ought not to feed in the same place. For after they have seen the brood of the Pea-fowl, they cease to cherish their own, aud desert them while still immature, clearly hating them because neither in size nor beauty are they comparable to the Peacock." — Book viii., chap. xi. + See the "Penny Cyclopa;dia," article Pavonidse : "I have never kept Pea-fowl, nor seen chicks just hatched, but have witnessed the abominable cruelty of the father of the family in knocking a whole brood of them on the head, when nearly a quarter grown."' — H, II. PEA-FOWL. 5 duced examples of such diverse tempers, so the Peacock family includes individuals of different degrees of blood- thirstiness. My own bird, three years old, was perfectly inoffensive ; others have been mentioned to me equally pacific. On the other hand, the list of murders undoubt- edly committed is long and heavy. The friend before mentioned says. " I have known them kill from twelve to twenty ducklings, say from a week to a fortnight old, during one day ; but if they came across a brood of young chicks or ducklings a few days old, they would destroy the whole of them." And yet, in the face of all this condemnatory evidence, we now and then see a favourite bird, with neck of lapis lazuli, back of emerald, wings of tortoiseshell, and tail outshining the rainbow, in some old-fashioned farm-yard, the pet of his mistress, who is perhaps the most successful poultry-woman in the neighbourhood, and whose stock shows no sign of any murderous thinning. The Peahen, who, when she has eggs or young, seems really a more guilty party, is not in general even suspected. So true is it that one man may steal a horse, while another must not look over the hedge. The hen does not lay till her third summer ; but she then seems to have an instinctive fear of her mate, mani- fested by the secresy with which she selects the place for her nest ; nor, if the eggs are disturbed, will she go there again. She laj'^s from four or five to seven. If these are taken, she will frequently lay a second time during the summer, and the plan is to be recommended to those who are anxious to increase their stock. She sits from twenty- seven to twenty-nine days. A common Hen will hatch and rear the young ; but the same objection lies against her performing that office, except in very fine long sum- mers, for the Pea-fowl as for Turkeys ; namely, that the poults require to be brooded longer than the Hen is able conveniently to do so. A Turkey will prove a much better foster-mother in every respect. The Peahen should of course be permitted to take charge of one set of eggs. 6 PEA-FOWL. Even without such assistance she will be tolerably suc- cessful. Those students of poultry who carefully read the " Guinea-fowl " and the " Turkey," and industriously carry the instructions there given into practice, will have no difficulty in rearing Pea-chicks. A friend writes, " As soon as the young could be decoyed into a shed or house, we always caught them, and gave to each poult three black peppercorns." I only mention the practice for the sake of condemning it ; and must most decidedl}', though deferentially, recommend that it be omitted, according to the rational theory of poultry-rearing. They are engaging little things, most elegant in appearance, and veiy tame and confident. I have heard of one reared under a Hen, that would sit upon the hand to peck flies from a window. The same wise provision of nature to be noticed in the Guinea-fowl, is evinced in a still greater degree in the little Pea-chicks. Their native jungle, tall, dense, sometimes impervious, swarming with reptile, quadruped, and even insect enemies, would be a most dangerous habitation for a little tender thing that could run and squat merely. Accordingly they escape from the egg with their quill feathers very highly developed. In three days they will fly up and perch upon any thing three feet high ; in a fortnight they will roost on trees or the tops of sheds, and at a month or six weeks you would see them on the ridge of a barn, if there were any inter- mediate low stables or other buildmg that would help them to mount from one to the other. It must be a clever snake that would get at the cunning little rogues when they were once perched on the feathery branch of a bamboo. Old birds received from a distance are diffi- cult to settle in a new home. Housing they do not like, and will scarcely bear. Most liberal feeding is the best bond of attachment, but even with that they will unex- pectedly be ofT, and will perhaps be stopped on the high road, like other suspicious vagrants. Were I myself to recommence keeping them, I would procure a sitting of eggs, place them under a Turkey lien, and have the PEA-FOWL. 7 pleasure of watcliing their whole progress, literally ah ovo. Those who are impatient to have a full-grown stock, should still select birds not more than three years old. The Peacock is capable of considerable attachment to man ; and, as might be expected of a bird that has been reared in captivity for several thousand years, may be rendered very tame. By regular feeding he may easily be made to take his place as a liveried attendant at the front door, to show himself, and await his meal with great punctuality. My own bird would come instantly to my call, and not only eat from my hand, but, if I held a piece of bread as high in the air as I could reach, would fly from the ground to take it. The hen was more timid, and could never be induced to give such proofs of confidence. She occasionally erects her tail like the hen Turkey, nor does such display appear to denote the absence of any feminine virtue. Tlie natural disposition of the Peacock is selfish and gluttonous, and it is only by pampering this weakness that he can be persuaded into obedience and attach- ment. He is vain, and at the same time ungallant. He is far from manifesting the politeness and attention which the common Cock shows towards his mates. The Peacock will greedily snatch, from the mouth of his hens, those titbits and delicate morsels which the Cock would either share with his favourites, or yield to them entirely. The Peahen, in return, cares less for her lord and master, and is more independent of him when once her amorous inclinations have been indulged. She then regards the display of his tail, his puffings and struttings, and all the rattling of his quills, with the coolest indif- ference. Nor does he seem to care much about her admiration, or to make all this exhibition of his attrac- tions to secure her notice, but is content if he can get some astonished Hen, or silly, bewildered Duck, up a corner, to wonder what all this fuss is about. Like other vain coxcombs, he expects the lady to make the first advances. O PEA-FOWL. Although occasionally cruel, the Peacock is shy of fighting, particularly when in full plumage ; nor do they so frequently engage with each other as with birds of a different species, such as Drakes, Cocks, &c. One, out of feather, was seen to keep up a three hours' struggle with a Musk Drake ; had it been in full plumage, it would not have shown fight at all. Their probable term of life is eighteen or twenty years. They may be eaten as poults at nine months old. If fatted, they should be shut up together with any Turkeys that they may have been in the habit of associating with, and fed exactly the same. If confined alone, they pine. They are, however, an excellent viand at a much more advanced age, and without any fatting, provided they have been w^ell fed, and killed at a proper season (that is, when they are not renewing their plumage), and are hung up in the larder a sufficient time before cooking. A disregard to these points has probably led to their being so little appreciated as a dainty dish.* Shotten herring, black salmon, pork in the dog days, and illegal oysters, might, in a similar manner, give a bad repute to other good things, did we not manage them better. When dressed for table, they should be larded over the breast, covered with paper, roasted at a gentle fire, and served with bread-sauce and brown gravy, exactly like Partridges or Pheasants. When moulting, extra diet and variety * With the ancient Romans they were esteemed as first-class delicacies : " Should hunger on j-our gnawing entrails seize. Will Turhot only or a Peacock please ? " Horace, Serm. I. 2. — Francis, Trans. " Quintus Hortensius was the first who gave the Romans a taste for Peacocks, and it soon became so fashionable a dish, that all people of fortune had it at their tables. Cicero pleasantly says, he had the hol(hiess to invite Hirtius to sup with him, even without a Peacock. ' Sed vide audaciam, etiam Hirtio caenam dedi sine pavone.' M. Aufidius Latro made a prodigious fortune by fattening them for sale." — Francis, A'ote to Serm. II. 2. PEA-FOWL. 9 of food, including hemp-seed and animal substances, is most desirable. In general the Peahen makes her nest on the bare ground, amongst nettles or rank weeds ; sometimes she chooses the shelter of a young fir tree. The egg very much resembles that of the Ostrich in miniature, being smooth, but indented all over with little dimples, as if pricked with a strong pin. It is somewhat bigger than a Turkey's egg, bulging considerably at the larger end, of a dull, yellowish white, and occasionally, but not always, spotted, or rather freckled, with a few small reddish brown marks. The new hatched chicks are striped on the head and neck with alternate stripes of dingy yellow and pale brown; their legs are of a dusky yellowish tinge. The under parts and breast are simply yellowish, of a colour some- thing between gamboge and ochre. The first wing feathers are pale cinnamon, barred with brown, like those of a young hawk. The Peahen has a very pleasing low kind of note, like a common Hen, when she has young. At this time she often puts herself into curious attitudes, walking about with the head stretched out as far as pos- sible, erecting the neck feathers, and frequently giving one the idea of a wooden bird. There are two varieties of the common Pea-fowl, namely, the Pied and the White. The first has irregular patches of white about it, like the Pied Guinea-fowl, the remainder of the plumage resembling the original sort. The White have the ocellated spots on the tail faintly visible in certain lights. These last are tender, and are much prized by those who prefer rarity to real beauty. They are occasionally produced by birds of the common kind in cases where no intercourse with other White birds can have taken place. In one instance, in the same brood, whose parents were both of the usual colours, there were two of the common sort, and one White cock and one White hen. The old notion respect- ing them, which has given rise to serious theoretical errors and to many false inferences, is, that they originated in 10 PEA-FOWL. the north, in Norway or Sweden ; the climate in which Ptarmigan, Snow Buntings, Alpine Hares, ee, often and rapidly repeated." — American Ornithological Biography, vol. 3, pp. 54, 55. The Musk Duck is excellent eating if killed just before it is fully fledged ; but it is longer in becoming fit for the table than the common Duck. Their flesh is at first high-flavoured and tender, but an old bird would be rank, and the toughest of tough meats. It is strange that a dish should now be so much out of fashion as scarcely ever to be seen or tasted, which, under the name of Guinea Duck, graced every feast a hundred and fifty years ago, and added dignity to every table at which it was produced. The domesticated bird is most frequently parti- coloured, with irregular patches of black, white, and brownish grey, the black prevailing on the upper, and the white on the under surface of the body. It has been seen that occasionally they are white ; but their filthy habits render these not desirable. Brown and white is a more rare colouring. Sometimes they are met with entirely black, which is by far the most ornamental variety ; it is, moreover, as we are informed, the colour 76 THE MUSK DUCK. of the wild bird ; and in a collection of ornamental poultry it is desirable to select those individuals which most closely represent the native appearance of their species. The black is beautifully metallic, somewhat iridescent and shaded with golden green. The feathers on the back are broad, and exhibit a handsome imbricated appearance. The eye is large, full, and clear ; and the red tubercles and skin at the base of the bill are strikingly contrasted with whatever coloured plumage the bird may be clothed with. THE GUINEA-FOWL. " The Meleagris is a most beautiful bird, in size of body, figure, bill, and foot, similar to a Pheasant ; with a horned crown sitting on its head like the ducal cap of the most illustrious Doge of Venice. The colour of its throat is exquisitely purple ; the rest of the body, if you take an upper view, is as if any one had separately sprinkled it with black and with white flour, ground finely but not mixed. You will hardly distinguish the male from the female : its voice is a divided creaking not more sonorous than the voice of a Quail. In running it is swift." — Joannes Caius's Libellus on the rarer Animals and Plants, 1570. We have refrained from applying the term " Pintado" to the Guinea-fowl : that word, signifying in the Portu- guese language " painted," and having been first appro- priated to the black and white-chequered Petrel {Pro- cellaria Capensis) by the navigators who found them in the South Seas. The Guinea-fowl is frequently called a Gallina, especially in Ireland. But under whatever denomination, it is no great favourite with many keepers of poultry, and is one of those unfortunate beings which, from having been occasionally guilty of a few trifling faults, has gained a much worse reputation than it really deserves, as if it were the most ill-behaved bird in creation : — whereas, it is useful, ornamental, and inter- esting during its life ; and when dead a desirable addition to our dinners, at a time when all other poultry is scarce. The best way to begin keeping Guinea-fowls is to pro- cure a sitting of eggs from some friend or neighbour on whom you can depend for their freshness, and also, if possible, yro??i a 2>Iclcs where only a single pair is kept. 78 THE GUINEA-FOWL. The reason of this will be explained hereafter. A Bantam Hen is the best mother ; she is lighter, and less likely to injure them by treading on them than a full-sized fowl. She will cover nine eggs, and incubation will last a month. The young are excessively pretty. When first hatched, they are so strong and active as to appear not to require the attention really necessary to rear them. Almost as soon as they are dry from the moisture of the egg, they will peck each other's toes, as if supposing them to be worms, will scramble with each other for a crumb of bread, and will domineer over any little bantam or chicken that may perhaps have been brought off in the same clutch with themselves. No one, who did not know, would guess, from their appearance, of what species of bird they were the offspring. The young of the Guinea-Fowl are striped like those of the Emu, as shown in the late Mr. Bennet's pleasing description of the Zoological Gardens, as they were in his days. Their orange-red bills and legs, and the dark, zebra- like stripes with which they are regularly marked from head to tail, bear no traces of the speckled plumage of their parents. Ants' eggs (so called), hard-boiled egg chopped fine, small worms, maggots, bread crumbs, chopped meat or suet, whatever in short is most nutritious, is their most appropriate food. This need not be offered to them in large quantities, as it would only be devoured by the mother Bantam as soon as she saw that her little ones had for the time satisfied their appetites, or would be stolen by sparrows, &c. ; but it should be frequently adminis- tered to them in small supplies. Feeding them three, four, or five times a day, is not nearly often enough ; every half-hour during daylight they should be tempted to fill their little craws, which are soon emptied again by an extraordinary power and quickness of digestion. The newly-hatched Guinea-fowl is a tiny creature, a mere infinitesimal of the full-grown bird ; its growth is conse- quently very rapid, and requires incessant supplies. A THE GUINEA-FOWL. 79 check once received can never be recovered. In such cases they do not mope and pine for a day or two, like young Turkeys under similar circumstances, and then die ; but in half an hour after being in apparent health, they fall on their backs, give a convulsive kick or two, and fall victims, in point of fact, to starvation. The demands of nature for the growth of bone, muscle, and particularly of feather, are so great, that no subsequent abundant supply of food can make up for a fast of a couple of hours. The feathers still go on, grow, grow, grow, in geometrical progression, and drain the sources of vitality still faster than they can be supplied, till the bird faints and expires from inanition. I have even fancied that I have seen a growth of quill and feather after death in young poultry which we had failed in rearing. The pos- sibility of such a circumstance is supported by the well- known fact of the growth of hair and nails in many deceased persons. This constant supply of suitable food is, I believe, the great secret in rearing the more delicate birds, Turkeys, Guinea-fowls, Pheasants, &c. ; never to suffer the growth of the chick (which goes on whether it has food in its stomach or not), to produce exhaustion of the vital powers, for want of the necessary aliment. Young Turkeys, as soon as they once feel languid from this cause, refuse their food when it is at last offered to them (just like a man whose appetite is gone, in consequence of having waited too long for his dinner), and never would eat more, were food not forced down their throats, by which operation they may frequently be recovered ; but the little Guinea- fowls give no notice of this faintness till they are past all cure ; and a struggle of a few minutes shows that they have indeed outgrown their strength, or, rather, that the material for producing strength has not been sup- plied to them in a degree commensurate with their growth. A dry sunny corner in the garden will be the best place to coop them with their Bantam Hen. As they increase in strength they will do no harm, but a great deal of good, 80 THE GUINEA-FOWL, by devouring worms, grubs, caterpillars, maggots, and all sorts of insects. By the time their bodies are little bigger than those of sparrows, they will be able to fly with some degree of strength ; and it is very pleasing to see them essay the use of their wings at the call of their foster- mother, or the approach of their feeder. It is one out of millions of instances of the provident wisdom of the Almighty Creator, that the wing and tail feathers of young gallinaceous birds, with which they require to be furnished at the earliest possible time, as a means of escape from their numerous enemies, exhibit the most rapid growth of any part of their frame. Other additions to their complete stature are successively and less imme- diately developed. The wings of a chicken are soon fledged enough to be of great assistance to it ; the spurs, comb, and ornamental plumage do not appear till quite a subsequent period. When the young Guinea-fowl are about the size of thrushes, or perhaps a little larger (unless the summer be very fine), their mother Bantam (which we suppose to be a tame, quiet, matronly creature) may be suffered to range loose in the orchard and shrubbery, and no longer per- mitted to enter the garden, lest her family shonld acquire a habit of visiting it at a time when their presence would be less welcome than formerly. They must still, how- ever, receive a bountiful and frequent supply of food ; they are not to be considered safe till the horn on their heads is fairly gi-own. Oatmeal {i. e. gi'oats), as a great treat, cooked potatoes, boiled rice, anything in short that is eatable, may be thrown down to them. They will pick the bones left after dinner with great satisfaction, and no doubt benefit to themselves. The tamer they can be made, the less troublesome will those birds be which you retain for stock ; the more kindly they are treated, the more they are petted and pampered, the fatter and better conditioned will those others become which you design for your own table, or as presents to your friends, and the better price will you get if you send them to market. THE GUINEA-FOWL. 81 At a certain period they will have got beyond the management of their good mother-in-law, and will cast off her authority. They will form what has appropriately been called a " pack ;" prowling about in a body after insects and mast, or grazing together (for they eat a great deal of grass*) still in a pack ; fiercely driving away any intruder on their society, and all giving tongue in one chorus at the approach of any danger. Birds thus reared on the spot where they are meant to be kept, are sure to thrive better and give less trouble than those procured from a distance ; which sometimes will not remain in their new home, but wander about in search of their old haunts till they either find them, or are themselves lost, destroyed, or stolen. All the poultry- books that I have seen are very meagre, and sometimes erroneous in their directions for the management of the less common fowls. For instance, not one that I am aware tells you that the Guinea-fowl is a monogamous bird, pairs with his mate, like a Partridge or a Pigeon, and remains faithful to her (perhaps with one or two trifling peccadilloes) so long as they continue to live together. It is generally supposed that the male Guinea- fowl, like the common Cock, is pleased with a plurality of wives ; and the supposition is acted on with bad practical effect. In the case where a Guinea cock and two hens are kept — a usual number — it will be found on close observation that though the three keep together so as to form one " pack," according to their original instinct, yet that the cock and one hen will be unkind and stingy to the other unfortunate female, keep her at a certain distance, merely suffering her society, and making her feel that she is with them onlyon sufferance. The neglected hen will lay eggs, in appearance, like those of the other, * Mr. Swainson points out the analogy which exists between the homed birds, the Cassowary, Curassow, and Guinea-fowl among the feathered tribes, and the ruminants among quadrupeds ; the quantity of crass eaten by the last-mentioned birds confirms his view of the subject. e 82 THE GUINEA-FOWL. but not SO many ; probably, in the same nest. If they are to be eaten, all well and good ; but if a. brood is wanted, and the eggs of the despised one chance to be taken for the purpose of hatching (and there is no possibility of distinguishing them without breaking them, — unless, it may be, the oxyhydrogen microscope could be made to throw light through them, as well as upon them), the result is disappointment and addle eggs. If the produce of the favourite (or rather let us say of the lawful wife) are selected, at the end of the month you have so many strong chicks ; if a mixture of eggs come to hand, the hatch is in proportion. I have known this occur repeat- edly. Therefore let all those who wish to succeed with Guinea-fowls, match their birds as strictly as the couples in a country dance. It is not every one who knows a cock from a hen of this species. An unerring rule is, that the hen alone uses the call-note " come-b?ick, come-back," accenting the second syllable strongly, from which they are usually called " come-backs," in Norfolk ; the cock has only the harsh shrill cry of alarm, which, however, is also common to the female. A widowed hen, whose husband had been unceasingly and irreclaimably impertinent to a noble Game Cock, and who lately lost her spouse in the duel provoked by his own repeated insolence, is, while I write, piping her melancholy cry, " come-back, come-back," under my study window. " Te, dulcis conjux, te solo in litore secum, Te, veniente die, te decedente canebat.'' ^oi translated thus : — " Restore, restore Eurydice to life : O take the husband, or return the wife ! " Back, however, he comes not, nor will come, in spite of her plaintive invitation, which will, doubtless, continue to touch our hearts, and grate our ears, tiU she is consoled for her bereavement by a second union. THE GUINEA-FOWL. 83 Their amours are conducted with strict decorum and privacy. The . cock, however, is properly poHte and attentive to his own hen in public, walking very close by her side, so as to touch her wings with his own, offering her tit-bits now and then, a worm or a grain of corn ; he has also a habit of running very quick for a few steps, and then walking affectedly on tip-toes, with a mincing air, like the dandy in a Christmas pantomime, setting up his back and increasing his apparent height. These latter symptoms are less evident in youth, when it is necessary to make the selection, and the call-note will be found the safest guide. Of all known birds, this, perhaps, is the most prolific of eggs. Week after week, and month after month, sees no, or very rare, intermission of the daily deposit. Even the process of moulting is sometimes insufficient to draw off the nutriment the creature takes, to make feathers instead of eggs, and the poor thing will sometimes go about half naked in the chilly autumnal months, like a Fowl that had escaped from the cook to avoid a prepa- ration for the spit ; unable to refrain from its diurnal visit to the nest, and consequently unable to furnish itself with a new gi'eat coat. As the body of a good cow is a distillery for converting all sorts of herbage into milk, and nothing else, or as little else as possible, so the body of the Guinea hen is a most admirable machine for produc- ing eggs out of insects, vegetables, grain, garbage, or whatever an omnivorous creature can lay hold of. From this gi-eat aptitude for laying, which is a natural property, and not an artificially encouraged habit, and also from the very little disposition they show to sit, I am inclined to suspect that in their native country, the dry burning wastes of Central Africa, they do not sit at all on their eggs, but leave them to be hatched by the sun, like Ostriches, to which they bear a close affinity. That they do in this country occasionally sit and hatch is no valid objection to this idea, but only an instance of habits modified by a change of climate, similar to the g2 84 THE GUINEA-FOWL. cessation of torpidity, and to the brown, instead of white, winter dress in animals brought from the arctic regions to temperate cUmates. Even in Great Britain there are not enough Guinea-fowls hatched by their actual parents to keep the breed from becoming extinct in a few years. It is certain that the sands of tropical Africa are more than hot enough to hatch them, and that the young birds are unusually vivacious and independent, if they have but a supply of proper food, which they would find in the myriads of insects engendered there. They are also found wild on the Island of Ascension, but it is doubtful whether any accurate account of their habits or mode of increase there is yet extant. Housewives complain that they are apt to lay astray in the hedge-rows and copses ; but what does it matter, if the people about you are but honest (and the way to make and keep them so is to treat them kindly and liberally), what does it matter whether you get one egg a day, or seven at the end of a week 1 And nest-hunting is always good fun for the children, and sometimes for the master and mistress. Guinea-fowl have another Ostrich-like habit. When a nest is robbed of its eggs, it is generally deserted by the birds, who never again make use of it from that time. Occasionally, however, especially if it be among rough herbage and low shrubs, at the end of three or four days, it will be found partially refilled, and containing more eggs than the bird could have laid in the interval. I was at first puzzled to account for this, till I discovered that the Guinea-fowl replaced her plundered property by rolling into the nest outlying eggs that had been laid previously. When a Guinea-hen is known to be sitting, it is desirable to have her watched, so that the moment the young leave the shell she may be secured and placed with her brood under a coop, where she will rear them as well as a Hen. The Guinea-fowl hatches a large number, when she does hatch at all. I have heard of as many as THE GUINEA-FOWL. 85 thirty-two chicks, which were dragged about by the mother, and lost in a field of wheat. Twenty- two have been reared when she has been caught and confined. The cock attends his own hen to the nest, waits for her close at hand till she has made her daily contribution to the treasure already there, and occasionally will betray the situation of the secret hoard by his extreme solicitude in announcing the presence of intruders. " Eggs . . . distinct with points, as in the Guinea- fowl." — Pliny, lib. X., clxxiv. Eggs of the Guinea-fowl are occasionally produced covered with wrinkles, as if the shell had shrunk in the process of hardening. These sometimes are confined to one (the smaller) end, and sometimes extend over the whole surface. They are evidently the result of weakness or over-exertion of the egg-organs, appearing in young and healthy birds only at the close of their long laying season ; in old and weak ones, showing themselves in the first-laid eggs, and increasing in depth and extent as the season advances. The same thing is less frequently seen among Turkeys that are about to cease laying. Such eggs are quite good for the table, but should not be taken for the purpose of hatching. They appear to contain a less proportion ofj^olk than the perfect egg. Guinea-fowl are in season from the middle of Decem- ber till April, but are usually reserved till the latter part of that term, in order to occupy the gap caused by the deficiency of game. And therefore the best time of the year for the amateur to procure any particular variety, is towards the close of the game season, at the end of Februar)' and beginning of March. A walk round the shops of the game-dealers vnll then give information of what sorts are reared in the neighbourliood, and those required may be ordered to be supplied alive. They usually weigh from three to four pounds each, and fetch from hs. 6d. to 7s. the couple in Norfolk. It is of no use attempting to shut them up to fatten, unless they have previously been made particularly tame, as they 86 THE GUINEA-FOWL. would sulk, pine, and die before they became reconciled to confinement, in spite of its extra diet. But if they have become familiar, the whole pack may be confined in company together in a roomy outhouse, and be supplied with all the oats they can eat, with considerable advan- tage. The sure plan, therefore, is to keep them in high condition during the winter, byjiberal hand-feeding. The practice is not to kill them with the knife, like other poultry, but to dislocate their necks, leaving the blood in them to remedy the dryness of their flesh, which is the great fault an epicure vi^ould find with them. They should also remain in the larder as long as possible before being cooked. It was formerly the fashion for farmer's wives and daughters to make tippets and muffs of the smaller feathers, which much resembled chinchilli fur in appear- ance, and were both elegant and useful. The normal plumage of the Guinea-fowl is singularly beautiful, being spangled over with an infinity of white spots on a black ground, shaded with grey and brown. The spots vary from the size of a pea to extreme minute- ness. Rarely the black and white change places, causing the bird to appear as if covered with a network of lace. " Marggravius saw others brought out of Sien-a Lyona like to the above described (Guiny Hen), whose Neck was bound or lapped about with, as it were, a membranous cloth of a blue ash-colour. A round many- double tuft, or crest consisting of elegant black feathers, covers the head. The white points or spots round the whole body are variegated, as it were, with a shade." ( Willughbg, p. 163.) A white variety is not uncommon, and is asserted by a Yorkshire correspondent of the " Gardener's Chronicle," to be equally hardy and profitable with the usual kind ; but the peculiar beauty of the original plumage is, surely, ill exchanged for a dress of not the purest white. It is doubtful for how long either this or the former one would remain permanent ; probably but for few generations. Pied birds blotched with patches of white are frequent, but are not comparable in point of THE GUINEA-FOWL. 87 beauty with those of the original wild colour. The figure in Sir W. Jardine's " Naturalist's Library " is evidently taken from one of the pied varieties. The ancients seem to have been acquainted with two or three species, the description of which hardly answers to those we know at the present day. There exist, however, several little known species. " The Africana, which most people call a Numidica, is like a Meleagris, except that it bears on its head a red helmet and comb, both which are blue in the Meleagiis." Columella, lib. viii. c. 2, The head and face of our birds are remarkable. The scarlet wattles, naked skin, distinct mark of the eye-brow, bright glancing eyes, and comical quick expression, make, at a front view, a perfect miniature of a clown dressed and painted for the circus or the pantomime. I am informed that gun-dogs set or point at Guinea- fowls that happen to stray in the fields, as if they were Partridges. THE CHINA GOOSE (Cygnoides). " I see we still did meet each other's man, And I was ta'en for him, and he for me, And thereupon these errors are arose. Methinks, you are my glass, and not my hrother ; I see by you, I am a sweet-faced youth." Comedy of Errors. Act 5. There is a venerable joke about a Spanish Don who knocked at a cottage door to ask a night's lodging. " Who's there ? What do you want 1" said the inmates. " Don Juan Jose Pedro Antonio Alonzo Carlos Geronimo, &c., &c.,