12 BULLETIN 205. LINDEN. The linden requires an abundance of deep rich soil and suffers much from gas, from drought, and from insect attacks. It does fairly well in Wash- ington, but is little planted now because of the extra care it requires as regards soil and water. In Berlin, Frankfurt, Hamburg, and Paris, the leaves of most varieties of linden fall prematurely on account of insect and fungus attacks. In Philadelphia a few years ago all the large lindens were killed by borers. A further objection to this tree is the litter made by its blossoms and fruit. TULIP-TREE. The tulip-tree is too large except for the widest avenues and park borders, where there is a quantity of rich deep soil and abundance of room. It is likewise difficult to transplant, the branches are very brittle, and the leaves are continually dropping throughout the season. It is, however, prac- tically free from enemies. BLACK LOCUST. The black locust is a rapid grower, hardy, easily propagated and trans- planted, and does well in poor soil. It is successfully cultivated in Paris, where the top is kept small and spherical and the branches thickly clustered. Its hard and durable wood is beginning to be used in Paris for paving the streets. On the other hand, the tree is scraggly and angular in form, its branches brittle, its foliage short- lived, its pods unsightly, and its roots badly given to sprouting. The locust borer often kills the black locust, as well as the honey locust, and has been known to FIG. 17. — Black locusts near Per e Le Chaise, Paris. spread from these trees to certain species of oaks. WILLOW. The weeping willow is the only species used on streets, and its occurrence is rare. It grows rapidly and when perfect makes a fine appearance, but the wood is tender and is often attacked by fnngi, while the tussock moth and other leaf-eating insects frequently destroy its foliage. The white willow is excellent for windbreaks and for planting along the banks of streams, railroads, and other embankments. Fine rows of this FIG. ^.—Old while willows along Cascadilla Creek, Ithaca, planted to preserve the banks of the stream. PLATE II— THE PROTECTION OF SHADE TREES. - NEW YORK FORESTRY PAMPHLETS VOL. Ill Tree Study -- John Bentley,' Jr. , Cornell Univ. How the Trees Look in Winter — L. H. Bailey, College of Agriculture, Cornell University, 1899. Evergreens, and How They Shed Their Leaves — H. P. Gould, College of Agriculture, Cor- nell University, 1899, The Cultivated Poplars — Bull. 68 -- L. H. Bai- ley, Cornell Agri. Experiment Station, 1894. Shade Trees — Bulletin 205 — W. A. Mur rill-- Cornell Agri. Experiment Station. Studies of Some Shade Tree and Timber Destroying Fungi — Geo. F. Atkinson ~ Bulletin 193, Cornell Agri. Experiment Station. T-C Blister Rust of Pines and the European Currant Rust — Geo. G. Atwood, Hew York State Department of Agriculture. Horticultural Bulletin No. 2. Damping Off — Bulletin 94, Cornell Agri. Experi- ment Station — Oeo. F. Atkinson. Control of Two Elm-Tree Pests — Glenn W. Herrick Cornell Agri. Experiment Station. The Bronze Birch Borer — M. V. Slingerland — Bulletin 234 — Cornell Agri. Experiment Station. The Larch Case-Bearer — Glenn W. Herrick — Bulletin 322 — Cornell Agri. Experiment Station. The Snow-White Linden Moth — Glenn W. Herrick ~ Bulletin 286 — Cornell Agri. Experiment Station. The Elm Leaf-Beetle ~ Glenn W.- Herrick, Circular Ho, 8 — Cornell Agri. Experiment Station V Hints on Rural School Grounds p-- fr.^R. Bailey — Bull. 160, Cornell Agri. Experiment Station. Mushrooms: II ~ Geo. F. Atkinson — Bull. 168, Cornell Agri. Experiment Station. n8 TREE STUDY " Peace of the forest, rich, profound, Gather me closely, fold me round; Grant that the trivial care and strife, The petty motive, the jarring sound, Melt and merge in your lovelier life. The myriad whispers of grass and pine, The stir of wings in the quest divine, I claim their music and make it mine.11 ELIZABETH R. MACDONALD THE ELM JOHN BENTLEY, JR. Of the many trees that are common in New York State, the elm is doubtless the most familiar to boys and girls. The reason for this is plain, when we consider that the elm is a tree of the farms, the home lawns, and the streets of the towns, rather than a tree of the deep woods. While it is found occasionally in the forest, it is almost always scattered among other trees and never forms a large proportion of the forest, as do maples, birches, pines, or oaks. Throughout the New England States, New York, and Pennsylvania, the elm is one of the commonest shade trees, not only for the streets of the towns and villages but also for the grounds about the home. The tree is so graceful and beautiful, and, when old, so stately and dignified, that it well deserves the place which it holds in the esti- mation of the people. The elm has a very distinctive form and habit of growth. Other trees seen from a distance are not always easy to recognize: the maple and the beech look somewhat alike, especially when young; the oak and the chestnut, the ash and the hickory, resemble one another slightly. But the elm, with its massive trunk — which quickly breaks up into several large branches, giving the tree an urn-shaped appearance — and the delicacy of the twigs and branchlets, forming a crown with a fringe-like margin, is easy to recognize even at some little distance. To a remark- able degree it combines strength with grace and beauty. The elm is a widely distributed tree. It is found in southern New- foundland and through the southern part of Canada as far west as the northern shore of Lake Superior. It grows along the Atlantic coast as far south as Florida, although it never reaches very large size in the southern part of its range. Westward it is found from South Dakota to Texas, although not in such large numbers as in the East. Everywhere it shows a preference for the low, rich lands that border rivers and streams, and it grows to its largest size where the soil is rich, fertile, deep, and moist. Under favorable conditions it will grow to a height of one hun- dred and twenty feet and a diameter of eleven feet. Many very large trees have become famous, as the large elm at Lancaster, Massachusetts, and the two elms on the river bank at Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania. It is the wide spread of the branches, as well as the massive size of the trunk, which makes the elm impressive ; sometimes the crown of a tree measures one hundred and twenty feet across. The elm tree, large as it is, springs from a very small seed. The flowers, which are inconspicuous, blossom early, before the leaves are fully grown, fade soon after, and are as quickly followed by the ripening seeds. These small seeds have wings on the margins, with sharp points, and are very 120 short-lived. Unless they fall on soil that makes a good seed bed and germinate immediately, they will die. They cannot wait, as do the seeds of the hickory, pine, and many other familiar trees. (Can you think of another familiar tree that ripens its seeds in early summer? See the Rural School Leaflet for September, 1912, page 163.) Besides plenty of moisture, which is one thing that the little elm seedling must have at the start, the quality of the soil and the amount of light that comes to che seedling have great influence on its growth. The soil must be rich and mellow, so that the rootlets can penetrate easily and find plenty of food material, and there must be plenty of light, so that the seedling can grow rapidly and become able to take care of itself before the autumn frosts arrive. This demand for light is one reason why we do not find elm trees in the deep, dark woods. When we do find an elm in the forest, it is be- cause there was an opening in which the little seedling could get a start. Elms will not do well when they are overtopped by their neighbors. When standing where there is plenty of room and light, the elm tree grows rather rapidly. Many men who do not consider themselves old can remember the time when, as boys, they watched their fathers set out elm trees along the roads or on the lawn, and those trees have now grown to be of large size. But the largest elms — those that are one hundred feet high and six to ten feet in diameter, with the large, spreading crowns — are probably two hundred years old or even older. Whether the elm is more beautiful in summer or in winter it is difficult to say. In summer its dense foliage hangs in graceful sprays from the drooping branchlets at the ends of the long limbs, swaying in the breeze and making a delightful shade. The upper side of the leaf is dark green; the under side is grayish green, reflecting a soft light which is very pleasant. Stripped of its foliage the elm presents an appearance in winter which shows its strength — not the rugged strength of the oak, with its gnarled, irregular branches, but a supple strength suggestive of self-contained reserve force. It is in the winter, too, that the delicacy of the smaller branches is seen to best advantage. Every wind sways Leaf and fruit of American elm 121 American elm in winter 122 them but they do not break; they yield gracefully and seem to enjoy the blasts of winter. Unfortunately the elm is the prey of a tiny insect, which eats the leaves and threatens to destroy the tree entirely in some parts of the country. This little insect, known as the elm leaf-beetle, has damaged thousands and thousands of elm trees during the past few years ; and although many persons have worked hard to get rid of it, the pest is continually spreading. The shade trees in towns and cities suffer most, apparently, and it is necessary to act promptly if the elm trees are to be saved. The insect itself is only about one quarter of an inch in length, brownish yellow in color, marked with a dark line along each side of its back. It sleeps during the winter, and the same warm days that bring out the elm leaves awaken this enemy of the elms. The beetles fly to the trees and begin to feed by eating small holes in the leaves. In a very few days the eggs are laid, and these quickly hatch into little grubs which begin in earnest to eat the leaves. So many eggs are laid that the number of grubs at work on the leaves is enormous. In fifteen or twenty days the grubs have completed their growth, and, unfortunately, their work of destruction also. They now crawl down the tree, and by the time another ten days have passed they emerge as fully grown beetles and are ready to repeat the process. Sometimes there are two complete broods of the insects in a single season, but the last brood as a rule does less damage than the first. The only way to save the elms from this enemy is to spray the leaves with a poisonous liquid. Although it costs twenty-five to sixty cents to have a tree sprayed, it will be necessary to spray our elm trees sys- tematically if we wish to save them. Those who are interested in the work of saving the elms should write to the State College of Agricul- ture and ask for a copy of Professor Herrick's Experiment Station Cir- cular No. 8, entitled " The Elm Leaf-Beetle." The next time you are in the woods, see whether you can find any elm trees growing where the woods are thick. If you see any, notice the shape of their trunks and their crowns. Compare them with the trees that grow along the streets in town. What do you think makes this difference in form? Again, if you find any elm trees in the woods, notice the kind of soil in which they grow best. Is it wet or dry? What other kinds of trees are found growing with the elm? About the last of May or the first of June, watch the elm to see when the seeds begin to fall. Take a few of them and sow them in a garden bed where the soil is soft, rich, and moist. Perhaps you will be able to see the small seedlings grow to a size that will enable them to take care of themselves before winter sets in. I23 The wood of the elm is useful for purposes demanding great toughness. It is often used in the making of barrels and fruit baskets. It is hard to split and work, and for that reason carpenters do not use it for wood- work or finishing; but if a tough wood is needed, a better wood than that of the elm is difficult to find. THE PINES OF NEW YORK JOHN BENTLEY, JR. In the winter months, when most of our forest trees are leafless, the firs, spruces, and pines, with their dark green foliage, are a cheerful sight. It makes us feel, somehow, that after all the woods are not lifeless in winter, and that there are some trees bold and hardy enough to withstand the snow and the cold. Pines are particularly notice- able, because there is more motion and life in their foliage than in -the stiff, rigid foliage of spruces and firs. Then, too, pines are more familiar to most of the boys and girls in the State, because spruces and firs belong to the cold climate of the mountains. There are five pines that are native to New York State, besides several others that may White Pine be found occasionally in our parks. The five native trees are (i) the white pine, (2) the pitch pine, (3) the red, or Norway, pine, (4) the jack pine, and (5) the Jersey scrub pine. The last two are not very common, however, and most of us will find only the three first mentioned. The pines as a group are marked by three characteristics which all boys and girls should notice first of all. They are: (i) the needle-shaped . 124 leaves, borne in clusters of two, three, or five needles; (2) the cones, in which the little seeds are borne; and (3) the wood, which always contains more or less pitch, or resin. These characters distinguish the coniferous (cone-bearing) trees from the broad-leaved trees. The term " evergreen " should not be applied to the pines, spruces, and firs, because there are other trees, as the holly and the live oak, which retain their leaves through- out the winter and are just as truly evergreen as is the pine or the spruce. Then, again, there is the larch, about which we learned last year (Rural School Leaflet for September, 1912, page 160), which bears cones and yet sheds its leaves every year. The leaves of the larch are needle-shaped, it bears cones, and there is some resin in the wood, and therefore it clearly belongs to the same family as do pines, firs, spruces, and hemlocks. In order to avoid all confusion, therefore, I would suggest that we learn to call all cone-bearing trees " conifers," which means " cone-bearers." Then let us call the others "broadleaf trees"; this will properly include the live oaks and the holly, and will do away with the confusing term " deciduous " (leaf -shedding) trees. Another term that is frequently heard is " hardwoods." As generally used, this term means the broadleaf trees, although there are some conifers with very hard wood — yellow pine, for example — and some " hardwoods," or " broadleaf "" trees, with very soft wood, such as the poplar and the willow. The use of confusing terms should be abandoned and the terms " conifer " and "broadleaf," while sounding a little strange at first, will express our meaning more nearly. The pines are nearly all of great value because of their wood, which is strong for its weight, straight-grained, and easily needle worked — that is, carpenters have little difficulty in planing and cluster •••:'•. ,/ • o t '4.1* shaping it to their purposes. Some of the pines have very hard, heavy, resinous wood, as the southern yellow pine; but our northern white pine is light and soft and contains only a moderate amount of resin. The white pine was formerly the most important timber tree of all the northeastern States, and many millions of board feet of white pine have been cut from the forests of New York State within the past century. It is still considered a very valuable tree, and lumbermen are always glad when they can find any white pine to cut because they know that it will bring a good price in the markets. The white pine is a tall, straight-trunked tree, often reaching a height of one hundred and twenty-five feet in the dense forests of the Adirondack Mountains. When growing in the woods the trunk is frequently clear of all branches for sixty or seventy feet, but when grown in the open, 125 where it has plenty of room, the crown is broad, with many limbs growing to within fifteen or twenty feet of the ground, and under these conditions the tree never grows very tall.. The lumberman likes best of all the tall, straight trees of the forests, for these will yield fine, straight-grained lumber with few knots. The white pine can be distinguished from the other pines of this State by the needles, which grow in clusters of five. Examine the foliage of a pine tree; you will see that the needles, instead of growing singly, grow in bunches, or clusters. In the white pine there are always five needles in a cluster. The individual needles are two and one half to five inches long, slender, flexible, bluish green, with a fine white streak. Let us now look for some cones. We may find some growing on the tree, or we can examine those that have fallen from the tree and are now lying on the ground. The white pine cone is about five inches in length, is usually slightly curved, and is slender, rarely exceeding an inch in thickness. Let us look a little more closely and see whether there are any ten pine needle • • -, , cluster spines, or prickles, on the cone. If we have )icked up a dry cone the seeds have loubtless been shed and scattered, f we can find a fresh cone with eeds in it, we can see how each seed 3 provided with a thin wing, which nables the wind to blow it for long listances. Now let us consider the pitch pine, /hich is probably the next most com- lon pine tree of this State. It is enerally found growing on very poor oils, where only the hardiest trees r shrubs will thrive. This tree can row in these poor situations because f its thick bark (often two inches lick at the base of the tree) and I Because it can resist fire much better •jlian can the white pine. It is not l| early so neat in appearance as the fttiiM*. 'Pitch pine ]• hite pine; its branches are irregular, the trunk is not so tall and Straight, and the old cones frequently hang on the tree for years. The 126 foliage is stiff and the needles are borne in clusters of three \ this at once distinguishes it from the white pine. The needles are a dark yellow- green instead of a blue-green. The cones are short and stout, about two or three inches long and two inches thick, and the cone-scales are armed with prickles. There is not the slightest resemblance between the white pine and the pitch pine, either in the needles, cones, or bark; and if you have an opportunity to look at the wood after the tree has been cut, you will find that there is no more resemblance there. The wood of the pitch pine is coarse-grained, full of pitch, and not adapted to the fine work for which white pine is used. Indeed, the wood of pitch pine is of little value except for coarse, rough lumber and for excelsior. The red pine, or Norway pine, as it is frequently called, is a tree that is not found in many parts of this State. It is common only in the Adirondack region, where it grows on light, sandy soils and has plenty of sunlight. It may be found occasionally, however, in other parts of northern New York. It can be distinguished by its long, flexible needles (four to six inches long), which are borne two in a cluster. The cones are two to two and one half inches long and have no prickles. Taking the cones and the needles together, there is no danger of confusing this tree with the other two pines mentioned. The red pine reaches a height of seventy-five or eighty feet. The wood is harder than that of the white pine, yet, like white pine, it is not durable in contact with the soil. Because of its hardness it is not so valuable a timber as white pine, but the red pine possesses the great advantage of being a tree that will grow well on land too poor to produce a satisfactory crop of white pine. It rarely makes close forests, because it is a tree that demands a great amount of light for its growth. Red pine trees are never found in large numbers together, at least in this State, but are found mixed with other trees, especially at the edge of lakes or in openings throughout the sandy stretches of country that are common in the Adirondack Mountains. The jack, or scrub, pine is not frequently seen in this State except in dry, sandy, barren soils in the northern part. It is usually a small, scrubby tree, with irregular branches, and of such poor form that it is practically worthless for lumber. The leaves are bluish green, covered with a gray bloom, and about two inches in length. They are borne in clusters of two, are twisted, and have a tendency to spread apart. The cones are small (rarely more than two inches long) and are armed with small prickles, which, however, may drop off. The Jersey scrub pine is still more irregular and worthless as a lumber- producing tree. It grows in poor, sandy soil and is found growing wild only on Long Island. The needles are borne in clusters of two and the cones have prickles. 127 THE MAPLES OF NEW YORK JOHN BENTLEY, JR. The maple family is a large one, containing many trees that are not only useful but also ornamental. In fact, most of the maples are valued chiefly because of their beauty of foliage. About thirteen kinds are con- sidered native to but by far the of the maples are and the islands continent. Many maples — some of some shrubs — in this country in parks and gar- streets; so that, in the country or are almost sure Maples are perhaps, because Whether we con- ual leaves of a the whole mass appears on a large leaves are beauti- tender leaves of maple when they the United States, greatest number native to Asia bordering that of these foreign them trees, and have been planted and are common dens or along city whether we are in the city, we to see maple trees, noticeable chiefly, of their foliage, sider the individ- silver maple or of foliage as it sugar maple, the ful. The little the soft, or red, burst from the Sugar maple buds in April are rich and warm in coloring; and what boy or girl who has been in the country during the month of October does not know the brilliant colors for which the maples are famous? The reds, golds, and yellows seem to flood the autumn air with a warmth and light which adds life to it. Let us make a list of the maples that we may expect to find in New York State, and then add a few descriptive notes regarding them: 1. Sugar, or hard, maple 2. Red, or soft, maple 3. Moosewood, or striped maple (a shrub or small tree) 4. Mountain maple (a shrub) 5. Silver maple 6. Box elder, or ash-leaved maple 7. Norway maple (not native, but commonly planted) Sycamore maple (imported) 128 Sugar maple Red maple Norway maple Outline drawings for blackboard work Moosewood maple Sycamore maple Outline drawings for blackboard work 130 The sugar maple is the largest and finest of the family. In deep woods, where it grows with the beech, birch, basswood, hemlock, ash, and other trees, it often reaches a height of more than one hundred feet, and has a trunk perhaps four feet in diameter which rises straight and full without a limb for more than half the height of the tree. Such a tree is in great contrast to those growing along the roadside, which are shorter and large- crowned and which have so many branches that it is difficult to find any one stem that seems to be the leader. Why does the maple tree growing in the open, where it has plenty of room, form such a round-headed crown, with no well-defined leader? Study the method of branching and see whether you can find out. The red maple can be distinguished from the sugar maple by its leaves in summer and by its buds in winter. The two kinds are contrasted in the drawings. Note that the lobes of the leaves (of which three are usually very conspicuous) are separated by U-shaped depressions, or sinuses, in the case of the sugar maple, and by V-shaped sinuses in the red maple. The buds of the sugar maple are long, pointed, and of a brown color, while those of the red maple are shorter, rounded, and red in color. These marks will serve as a means of identification at any time of the year. The red maple prefers a wet, swampy soil, while the hard maple thrives in a rich, cool, well-drained soil. The silver maple has a very beautiful leaf, by which it can always be recognized in summer. Notice, in the drawing, how deeply and finely the leaves are cut; this gives to the tree its peculiar delicacy and makes it desirable for decorative purposes. In fact, the tree is of little use except as an ornament ; the wood is soft, weak, and brittle when compared with that of the sugar maple. The mountain maple and the moosewood (or striped maple) are very humble members of the maple family, rarely growing to be more than shrubs ; but they add greatly to the beauty of the woods as we know them in the North. Both these maples are common in the woods of New York, especially in the Catskills, the Adirondacks, and other hilly parts of the State. Favorite situations for these maples are steep, rocky slopes, where there is plenty of moisture, as on the north side of hills or mountains. The leaves are much like the leaves of other maple trees; those of the mountain maple resemble those of the red maple, but the little veins on the former are much more noticeable and the underside of the leaf is covered with a whitish down, which is absent from the red maple. Another character that will serve to distinguish this little maple from the red maple is the seed. The flowers of the mountain maple appear in clusters, which botanists call "racemes"; that is, there are several flowers borne on a central axis and they begin to blossom at the bottom first. The artist has come to our assistance again, and you will see in the drawing of the seeds that the difference in the fruit is clearly brought out. The red maple bears its seeds in clusters close to the stem. The moosewood has a leaf that distinguishes it easily from other maples. The leaf is large, with lobes only slightly cut, and is soft in texture. Perhaps the most noticeable character of this tree — one by which the boys will learn to recognize it — is the bark. This is reddish or greenish brown marked with pale stripes running up and down, so that the name " striped maple " is very appropriate. The flowers of this maple also are borne in racemes, so that this feature, together with the striped bark, will always serve to identify it. The box elder, or ash-leaved maple, is the odd member of the family, for it has leaves totally different from those of the other maples that we know in this country. Instead of a single, simple leaf, this maple has a compound leaf with three to five leaflets. If it were not for the fruit, which is a true maple " key," we should feel more inclined to call it an ash — a feeling that is shown in one of the common names for the tree. The box elder has been used for planting in the treeless regions of the Middle West because it will endure dry weather and will grow rapidly even on relatively poor soils. But the wood is weak and perishable and the tree almost always grows crooked, especially if it is exposed to winds; so that altogether it is not to be considered very valuable. The Norway maple, which has been planted extensively as a shade tree because of its rapid growth and heavy foliage, is a native of Europe but does very well in this climate. The leaves bear a general resemblance to those of the hard maple, but are much darker in color, usually larger, and thicker. If one is in doubt about the tree, the milky sap from a freshly broken leaf stem will distinguish it. In winter the leaf buds are very large and the bark is smooth and dark-colored. The sycamore maple, another European tree, is also planted to some extent in this country although it does not grow so well in our climate as does the Norway maple. The leaves are conspicuously three-lobed, and are very broad compared with those of the native hard maple. The margins of the leaves are serrated, somewhat like those of the red maple. The most valuable and useful of all the maples is the sugar maple. The wood is heavy, hard, and close-grained. It is used for furniture, floor- ing, and many small wooden articles. It also makes one of the best fire woods that our forests produce. The custom of making sugar and sirup from the sap of this tree is well known and needs no special men- tion here. Besides the maples mentioned above, it is likely that many Japanese maples will be found in parks and gardens. These small maples, rarely larger than bushes, are remarkable for the beauty of their leaves. 5 132 THE OAKS OF NEW YORK JOHN BENTLEY, JR. A brave old oak There are nearly fifty different kinds of oaks in the United States, and if we should include the several varieties, some of which are indistinct, the list would be so long that it would be discouraging to try to learn all of them. Fortunately we can learn to distinguish those that are common in New York. Although there are some fifteen or sixteen kinds of oaks reported as growing in this State, we shall describe but ten. The others are rare or of very local occurrence. It will be necessary to have not only the leaves, but the acorns and sometimes the twigs and the winter buds, in order to distinguish all the oaks described. In the first place, we can divide the oaks into two general groups: those that have acorns maturing in one season, known as the white oaks; and those that have acorns maturing in two seasons, known as the black oaks. A further distinction between these two groups is that the black oaks have leaves the lobes of which are tipped with bristles, while the lobes of the leaves of the white oaks are smooth and rounded. Between the lobes are indentations which botanists call " sinuses." These sinuses are variable and are often a help in identifying the different species. On pages 136 and 137 is given a key for identifying the different species of oaks. Note the use of the term sinus in this key. 133 As a family the oaks are very useful; but there is a great difference between the several species, especially as to rate of growth, hardness of wood, and usefulness of wood. In general the white oaks are harder and more durable than the black oaks, and when a carpenter or a wood- worker wants a piece of very hard, heavy, durable wood that will hold its shape without shrinking, warping, or checking, he will be likely to choose a piece of white oak in preference to any other kind, of oak. In the market, swamp white oak passes for white oak and sometimes a small quantity of chestnut oak may be included with true white oak; but the wood of chestnut oak is not so strong and good as that of true white oak. In form the oaks present a great variety. White oak growing in the woods has a long, clear stem for perhaps fifty or sixty feet and reaches a height of over one hundred feet. In the open fields, where it has plenty of room to develop a big crown, the form is likely to be short and round- headed, with a stout trunk and with little of it clear of branches. The oak always presents an appearance of great strength and sturdiness; the winds of winter have little effect on its tough, strong branches but these are frequently gnarled and irregular as a result of exposure to storms. The acorns of the white oak will germinate soon after falling in autumn if the conditions are favorable; but because so many acorns are eaten by squirrels, and because so many others do not find the right conditions of soil and moisture, only a small number succeed in growing to a size that will enable them to live over the first winter. Although a widely distributed tree, the white oak is found most commonly on good moist soil in rich bottom lands or in protected hollows. In the country adjacent to the Ohio River valley the white oak finds the best conditions of soil, climate, and rainfall. It will grow also on rather dry, stony soil, but it never reaches such good size under these conditions. Of the black oaks, the common red oak is the most desirable because of the rapidity of its growth and the general quality of its wood. Although not nearly so strong as white oak, it is heavy and rather hard and will be useful where great strength is not required. The grain of the wood is rather coarse and it never seasons so well as does the white oak. In form the red oak develops a very large, wide-spreading crown, with a number of large branches; but it almost always has a well-formed stem, making possible the cutting of good saw logs from it. The red oak grows farther north than any of our native oaks, and is not nearly so particular as the white oak as to quality of soil. The common black oak is of relatively little importance. The tree does not grow to such good proportions as the red oak and the wood is 134 Bur oak Swamp oak Post oak Chestnut oak Outline drawings for blackboard work Scrub white oak Pin oak Outline drawings for blackboard work 136 poorer in quality. It is used for railroad ties and rough timbers, but it is not so durable as the red oak. The scarlet oak is a much smaller tree than either the red or the black oak and it is almost always found growing on sandy or gravelly soils. Its form is not good enough to make it an important timber tree. The two scrub oaks, which are really little more than shrubs, cover vast areas that have been burned over and are often the obstacle to having better trees on this kind of land. It is better, however, to have them growing on the land than to have nothing at all, for in the latter case the soil might be washed away by heavy rains; and perhaps we shall be able to start more desirable kinds of trees where the scrub oaks are now grow- ing, taking advantage of the protection that they afford. KEY TO THE COMMON OAKS OF NEW YORK A. Acorns maturing in one season; leaves with rounded lobes and rounded sinuses WHITE OAKS 1 . Margin of leaf merely wavy-toothed, not cut so deeply as to be called lobed (a) Margin finely wavy-toothed Chestnut oak (b) Margin coarsely wavy-toothed, more pointed than in (a) Swamp white oak 2. Margin of leaf distinctly lobed; one pair of broad sinuses cutting nearly to the midrib of the leaf, so that the upper part of the leaf is much heavier and broader-looking than the lower part. Acorn with a mossy cup Bur oak, or Mossy-cup oak 3. Margin of leaf distinctly lobed sometimes very deeply cut, with broad, sinuses (a) Lobes usually seven or nine in number; acorns pointed; cup enclosing not more than one fourth of the nut White oak (b) Lobes usually five in number; acorns not so pointed, and cup enclosing one third to one half of the nut . . Post oak A A. Acorns maturing in two seasons; leaves with pointed, bristle- tipped lobes and rounded sinuses BLACK OAKS i. Leaves green on both sides (a) Sinuses very broad, broader than the lobes between them (i) Acorn small and flat, the nut almost hemi- spherical. Usually found growing in moist, rich soil on the banks of streams or the borders of swamps Pin oak 137 (ii) Acorn slightly larger and more nearly round. Kernel whitish. Usually prefers dry soils on ridges and well-drained situations . . Scarlet oak (b) Sinuses usually not so broad as the lobes between them (i) Leaves thick and firm; dark green, lustrous above; more or less fuzzy on the under- side Black oak (ii) Leaves thin and firm; dark, dull green above; on the lower side usually smooth, or with fuzzy hairs near the veins only Red oak Or by their acorns these two oaks can be distinguished as follows: Cup very flat, saucer-shaped Red oak Cup not so flat, enclosing nearly half the nut Black oak 2. Leaves green above, gray-green or yellowish green and scurfy on the lower side; usually with only three lobes. (Found only on Long Island) Blackjack " What does he plant who plants a tree? He plants a friend of sun and sky ; He plants the flag of breezes free; The shafts of beauty towering high; He plants a home to heaven anigh, For song and mother-croon of bird In hushed and happy twilight heard — The treble of heaven's harmony — These things he plants who plants a tree." HENRY CUYLER BUNNER ' The cattle also are very glad of a great tree, They chew the cud beneath it while the sun is burning, And there the panting sheep lie down around their shepherd. " He that planteth a tree is a servant of God, He provideth a kindness for many generations, And faces that he hath not seen shall bless him." HENRY VAN DYKE It is better to observe for five minutes and draw for one, than to observe for one and draw for five. We may make our drawing lesson more interesting by telling the class something about the object which they are to draw, involving in our story facts that will tend to impress upon their minds some of the most salient characteristics of the object. We should encourage the children to discuss the object, drawing out facts from their own observation. Certain kinds of trees, like certain races of people, have a general similarity, yet every single tree has an individuality of its own. Let us apply a few essential questions that will help us to determine at least the kind of tree it is, the race to which it belongs ; for first we must get its general character, seeing its big proportions and shape ; and later must search for its individualities. Is it tall for it's greatest width ? How far does the trunk extend before dividing? At what height do the lowest branches begin ? What is their general direction ? Do they appear to radiate from the trunk ? How do the main branches compare in size with the trunk ? Are they crooked or straight ? The manner of branch growth must be studied carefully. We see in our elm (Fig. 34) that the trunk divides at about a fourth of its height into several main branches, while in the cases of the pepperidge (Fig. 29) the trunk extends to the very top of the tree, the branches being small in proportion to the trunk, not varying much in size, and taking an oblique downward direction. Notice the weird expression of these trees with their crookedly bent tops, one side of each trunk being almost devoid of branches. The trunk of the sassafras (Fig. 30) continues nearly to the top of this tree, while the large branches, though unsymmetrical, give it a well balanced appearance. Again in our picture of the thorn-apple (Fig. 31), we are at once impressed with its irregular form, the branches on the left taking a more oblique direction than those of the other side, the trunk dividing a little short of half the height of the tree. 35. Blocking-in the elm tree ( Fig. 34). The first work which the artist does when he draws the tree. 140 We may now take up our lesson. Our subject is an elm tree (Fig. 34) ; our medium, lead pencil ; our drawing to be rendered in outline. Material. — Almost any good drawing paper, white or buff in color, will answer our purpose : 9x12 is a good size. Our pencil should be of medium grade lead (F. or HB. ) of any standard make, Kohinoor preferred. If procurable, we should have a light drawing board 17x22 inches (here is an opportunity for the carpenters) to place the paper on, otherwise a very stiff piece of cardboard ; or a large geography book might answer. It is best, however, to fasten our paper, which we cannot do in using the book. For fastening the paper we shall need four thumb tacks for the corners. A Faber or multipex pencil eraser is needed ; also a sponge eraser with which to remove the light lines and clean the draw- ing before lining it in. Our position. — Our point of view will depend upon our subject, but it is not well to be so near as to necessitate raising the head in order to see the top of the tree. If we take longer than one sitting for our drawing (which I do not think advisable, as we must not choose too complicated a subject) we must mark our posi- tion in order to again obtain the same point of view. Position of the drawing-board. — Our paper must be placed on the board with its edges parallel to those of the board. The drawing-board should be held perpendicular, or nearly so, to the direction in which it is seen, for if the board is tilted far back- ward, it will be fore-shortened and our tree probably will have been drawn longer than it should be. Hoiv to look. — The tendency of the beginner is to see and draw too much in detail. It is most essential that we look first for the large shapes, the greatest dimensions ; next for the smaller ones ; last for detail. It is not well for the pupils to work too close to their drawings. They should occasionally sit well back in their seats or get up and stand behind their chairs in order to obtain the general effect of their drawing, to see that the big shapes are right and that the spirit of the tree has not been lost. As an aid to placing our drawing so as to best fill the space it has to occupy , we may use what the French call a ' ' cherche -motif, ' ' the English, a finder. This is nothing more than a small 36. Working in the details with sharp lines. The original pencil sketch is not followed exactly. 142 piece of stiff paper or cardboard, about 5x8 inches, in which is cut a small rectangular opening ^xi inch ; the size may vary somewhat. We may look through this opening, the card acting as a frame to our picture. This will help us to decide whether our subject will look better placed the horizontal or vertical way of the paper. We may include more or less in the finder by varying its distance from the eye. Now, I am sure we would not place ourselves within a dozen yards of our tree if we wished to get its general effect ; there- fore, we must have plenty of foreground in our drawing. We must give the eye a chance to look, allowing plenty of space between the lowest point of our drawing and the lower edge of our paper. We must also avoid crowding it to the right or left. As the height of tree we are to draw (Fig. 34) is greater than its greatest width, we find that it will fill the space best if placed the vertical way of the paper. After indicating the extreme height and width by four light marks, before carrying the draw- ing further we must test these proportions by comparing the width with the height, always testing the shorter dimension into the longer, viz.: To test the drawing. — Close one eye. The pencil may be used to test the drawing by holding it in front of one at arm's length (as in Fig. 33) perpendicular to the direction in which the object is seen ; also revolving it in a plane perpendicular to the direc- tion in which the object is seen, in order to compare one dimen- sion with another. For example, hold your pencil horizontally at arm's length so that its blunt end covers the outermost left- hand point of the elm. Slide your thumb along the pencil till it covers the extreme right-hand point ; retain that measurement (keeping the same position in your chair, pencil always at arm's length) ; revolve the pencil in the same plane until it coincides with the height of the elm, at the same time lowering it so that the end of the thumb covers the lowest point of the tree ; note carefully the point that the blunt end covers ; raise the pencil so that the end of the thumb covers that point, noting again where the blunt end occurs and notice how many times, and over, the width goes into the height. In our elm (Fig. 34) we find that the width goes about once and six-sevenths, into the height, or a little 37- The outline drawing complete, and the first pencil marks erased. 144 short of twice. If the latter statement is preferred, we must bear in mind the proportion left over. Do not use the scale side of a ruler or marks on the pencil or object used in order to test the proportions. A scale or other mechanical means should not be used in free-hand drawing. The teacher should have a spool of black thread and should give a piece about 2 ft. 6 inches long to each pupil. An eraser, a knife, or some small article may be attached to one end of the thread. By holding the weighted thread as a plumb-line in front of us, we have an absolutely vertical line ; so by having it intersect a desired point of our tree we may obtain the relative positions of other points to the right and left of this intersected point. Blocking -in. — We may conceive of the general shape of our elm by looking at it with half-closed eyes. It appears in sil- houtte. Now imagine lines joining its outermost points ; this will give the general mass or shape of our tree. Now if we represent these outermost points contained in these lines, by sketching lightly these " blocking-in " lines, as they are called, we obtain the general shape of the elm (Fig. 35). We must emphasize the fact that these blocking-in lines be sketched in lightly by holding the pencil near the blunt end, using a free-arm motion. Now before going farther we again test these new- points to see if they occupy their right positions in relation to the height and width. Do not, however, transfer the measure- ments from the pencil to the paper. This test is only to obtain the proportion of one dimension to another. Having tested these smaller dimensions we may draw lightly the main branches. After having indicated their general direction and character of growth, we may indicate some of the smaller branches and twigs (Fig. 36). All this work should be carried out without erasing ; all corrections should be made by slightly darker lines. Let us now sharpen our pencils to a good point and go over the drawing with a fine dark line, carefully studying the charac- ter and spirit of the tree. Now erase the lighter and superflu- ous lines, as the dark lines remain distinct enough to indicate our drawing. Lining-in. — We may now take our pencil nearer the point and H5 proceed to line-in the drawing, going over it with a definite consistent line. If desirable, we may accent and bring out certain parts of the tree stronger than others by darker or shade lines and short strong markings called accents. These are especially effective at the junction and underside of branches, and where one wishes to give the object a nearer appearance. We should be cautious in using them, however ; but lack of space does not permit further discussion of the subject of accented outlines. We should also allow the pupils to make short ten or fifteen minute " time sketches " of trees. In these, it is the spirit and general eifect of the tree that we must strive for. Above all, we must allow our little draughtsman to give his own interpretation of the tree. A helpful suggestion as to proportion, etc., would be in place, but we must allow his individuality to have as much play as possible. The suggestions given on these pages are necessary for the beginner. Some of them are hard facts; but it lies with the teacher to develop the aesthetic and artistic qualities lying dormant in the pupil, ready to be moulded and started in the right direction. . If you have confined the pupils to the flat copy, break away from it ; allow them to create. Let them see the beautiful things all about them. They will respond. Let them draw from nature and still life. Train them to observe. The early summer days, just before school closes, with their bright sunlight and strong shadows, make many subjects inter- esting as light-and-shade drawings. Fall with its brilliant color- ing gives us a chance to use the color-box, while the early winter twilights will bring many an interesting silhouette before our boys and girls, which next day during the drawing hour may be carried out in pen and ink. The most successful teacher will be the one of sympathetic nature whose love reaches out to the boys and girls, as well as to all things beautiful. The most successful teacher will be the one who endeavors to place the children where they may view nature sympathetically and with the most intimate relationship. 146 These leaflets are designed to suggest means and methods by which teachers may interest children in nature-study. The ultimate object of our work is to inculcate a love for country life, and this can best be done by interesting the coming generation in country things. The teacher will also find nature-study to be directly valuable as a means of education, or training the mind of the child. We want your full co-operation and your unreserved criticism. Any com- munication which you may send to us will receive prompt and direct attention : The following leaflets have been issued to aid teachers in the public schools in presenting nature-study subjects to the scholars at odd times : 1. How a squash plant gets out of the seed. 2. How a candle burns. j. Four apple twigs. 4.. A children" s garden. For the pupils. 5. Some tent-makers. 6. What is nature-study f 7. Hints on making collections of insects. 8. The leaves and acorns of our common oaks. 9. The life- history of the toad, to. The birds and I. TI. Life in an aquarium. T2. How the trees look in winter. Bulletin 159 gives a general review of the Cornell Agricultural Extension Work. These will be sent free to all engaged in teaching in the public schools of the State of New York. Address, Bureau of Nature- Study, College of Agriculture, Ithaca, N. K TEACHER'S LEAFLETS FOR USE IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS PREPARED BY NO. 13, FEBRUARY, 1899. THE COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE, CORNEL UNIVERSITY, Issued under Chapter 67 of the Laws of 1898. ITHACA, N. Y. I. P. ROBERTS, DIRECTOR. Evergreens, and How They Shed Their Leaves, BY H. P. GOULD. ONE-BEARING evergreens are familiar to everyone ; yet this familiarity is usually with the trees as entire objects. We da not often stop to analyze a tree in order to find out what gives it its characteristic appearance or to see what makes it look as it does. We will often find, if we stop to look, that much of the character of a tree, — that is, its general appearance or the way in which it impresses us, — is due to the leaves and to their arrangement on the branches. This is true of many of the evergreen trees. Note to the teacher. — This leaflet has two particular objects : to teach how evergreens shed their leaves, and to enable you to distinguish a few of the evergreens which are most commonly met. These studies (and those sug- gested in Leaflet No. 12) should be the means of adding much cheer to the winter. Encourage pupils to make collections of cones, to observe when they shed their seeds,and how long ( how many seasons) they remain attached to the branch. Remember that mere identification of the kinds of trees is not the highest type of nature-study. Cones are good subjects for free-hand drawing. Beginners should draw them in outline, omitting the shading. Encourage pupils to draw* single leaf- clusters of the different pines, cautioning them to get the right number of leaves in each case. 148 Why are certain kinds of trees called evergreen, in distinction from those which are said to be deciduous? The reason is obvious. One kind is always green from the presence of foliage, while the other sheds all of its leaves every season. The ever- green trees, like the pines and the spruces and firs, always appear to be well covered with foliage, so it does not often occur to us that these trees shed their leaves. And yet perhaps we can recall happy hours when we used to play beneath some large pine tree where the ground was carpeted with pine ' ' needles. ' ' The falling of the leaves of the maple trees or the oaks is a 38. Shoot of the common white pine, one-third natural size. familiar sight, but who has seen the spruce leaves fall, and who can tell when the pine needles drop ? That the evergreen trees do shed their foliage, as truly as the maples and the elms do, we will not question, for we can see the fallen leaves under any tree. Look up into the top of a spruce or pine. See that the interior is bare of foliage. The leaves are towards the ends of the branches, where they receive sunlight. Yet the branches which are now on the interior once bore leaves, for we can see the leaf-scars. It will be interesting to find out something about the leaves of our common evergreens. Let us look at some of them. 149 THE WHITE PINE. In Fig. 38 is shown a white pine branch. Notice that the leaves are borne in bunches or clusters of five. Each bunch of leaves is produced in the axil (or angle) of a minute scale-like body, but this scale cannot usually be found except on the very young growth. It has been worn away or broken from the older growth by the wind and the rain and the other forces of nature. Another strange fact should attract our attention. The leaves of the maples and other deciduous trees are borne only on the present season's growth; but this is not the case in the pines, and kindred trees. If we trace back the growth of the past two or three years, we shall find that there are as many leaves on the wood that is two years old as there are on the last season's growth ; and in many cases we can find leaves on the part of the branch that is three years old. This means that the pine leaves or needles are two and sometimes three years old when they fall. The Fig. 38 shows the falling of the leaves from the different years' growth. The part of the branch between the tip and A is the last season's growth ; between A and B it is two years old ; the part between B and C is three years old. The part that grew four seasons ago — beyond C — has no leaves. The different season's growth is not indicated by distinct "rings" as in the case of deciduous trees (See Leaflet No. 3), but by the branching. Each whorl of branches about a limb represents the end of a season's growth. A young pine tree, or the younger limbs of an old tree, show this character very plainly. Do the leaves of the pines and of the other evergreen trees fall at the end of the growing season, as the leaves of most of the deciduous trees do? Or do they gradually become lifeless and fall at any season, from the force of the wind and other forces of 39- Cone of white pine. It has shed its seeds. Half natural size. 150 nature ? Tie a large sheet of cloth in the top of some evergreen tree, in such a way as to form a receptacle to catch the leaves. Do you catch leaves in winter as well as in summer ? There are several different kinds of pines, so we must picture carefully in our minds the foliage of the white pine, for it is dif- ferent from that of any others. The leaves are soft and very slender, and from three to four inches long. The base of each cluster of leaves is at first surrounded by a small sheath-like 40. Shoot of common pitch pine. One -ha If natural size. body, but this falls away when the leaves are still very young. A scar is left when the leaves drop and these scars can often be seen on parts of the branches that are eight or ten years old. Do the leaves of other kinds of trees make a scar when they fall ? The white pine cones, in which the seeds are borne, are con- spicuous objects. They are five or six inches long and slightly curved. It will be interesting to find out if the seeds ripen the same year in which they are formed. Perhaps a cone still con- taining seeds can be obtained. Carefully tear it apart and see where the seeds are attached. Red squirrels sometimes eat the pine seeds. A white pine cone, which has shed its seeds, is shown in Fig. 39. This kind of pine is found widely scattered in New England, New York and westward to Minnesota and Iowa and along the Allegheny Mountains as far south as Georgia ; also in some parts of Canada. It is a valuable lumber tree. THE PITCH PINE. This kind of pine is very different, in many respects, from the white pine. Let us find some of the differences. Instead of having leaves in bunches of five, it has them in clusters of three, and the base of each cluster is inclosed by a scaly sheath which does not fall away as in case of the white pine ; neither does the little scale-like body upon the branch, in the axil of which the leaf -cluster is borne, fall away, but it may be found just below the leaf, and even on branches that are several years old. Some- times a sheath is found with only two leaves. We shall want to know, too, how old the leaves are when they fall. Do they remain on 41- Cone of pitch pine. One-half natural size. the tree longer than the white pine leaves do ? Again, instead of being soft and slender as the white pine leaves are, we shall find that these leaves are rigid and large in comparison, and stand out straight from the branches. The shape of the leaves is also distinct from the white pine needles. See if you can find any other differences. A pitch pine branch is shown in Fig. 40. The part between the tip and A is the past season's growth. Observe the foliage on the part that is two years old. Part of it has fallen. We often find it on growth which is older than this ; but in this specimen there are no leaves on the three-year wood. The cone of the pitch pine is very unlike that of the white pine. Fig. 41 gives a good idea of one which has shed its seeds. Compare this with Fig. 39 ; or, better, examine the two kinds of cones side by side. The pitch pine cones are sometimes borne in clusters of two or more and they persist, — that is, remain on the tree for several years after the seeds have ripened and scattered . 152 Notice how the new cones are borne with reference to last sea- son's growth. Are they attached to the tip of a branchlet? Or are they closely attached to the side of a branch ? Figs. 42 and 43 will help us answer this question. The little cones in Fig. 43, near the tip of the twig, are just beginning to form. The pitch pine usually grows in sandy or rocky soil and is found in the United S tates along the Atlan- tic coast to Vir- ginia, along the mountains to Georgia, west- ward to Western New York, East- ern Ohio, Ken- tucky and East- ern Tennessee. It has little value as timber, be- cause it does not grow large enough, SCOTCH AND AUSTRIAN PINKS. In the same manner, other pines may be studied. Fig. 44 shows a cone and bit of foliage of the Scotch pine, and Fig. 45 the Austrian pine. These cones grew the past season and are not yet mature. After they ripen and shed the seeds which they contain, they will look something like the cone in Fig. 41. The Scotch pine has short and blue-green needles. The Austrian pine is coarser, and has long dark-green needles. There are but two leaves in a cluster on these kinds of pines and we shall find that the sheath which incloses the base of the leaf -cluster is more conspicuous than in either the white or pitch pines. Do the leaves persist in the Scotch and Austrian pines 42. Pitch pine. One-third natural size. 43- Pitch pine, showing young cones. Half natural size. I 44. Scotch pine. Half natural size. 154 longer than they do in the others we have examined ? Study the cones of these and other pines. The Scotch and Austrian pines are not native to this country, but are much grown for ornament. They can be found in almost any park, and in many other places where ornamental trees are grown. THE NORWAY SPRUCE. The leaves of spruce trees are borne very differently from those of the pines. Instead of being in clusters of two or more, they are single and without a sheath at the base; neither are there scale-like bodies on the branches where the leaves are borne. Notice, too, that the leaves have a very short stem or petiole. The leaves of the Norway spruce are about one inch long, although the length varies more or less in different parts of the tree and in different trees. They are rather stiff and rigid 45. Austrian pine. One-third natural size. and sharp- pointed. In a general way, the leaves are four-sided, though indistinctly so. It will be interesting to study the position which the leaves 155 take on the branches. A hasty glance might give us the impres- sion that the leaves are not produced on the under side of the branches ; but a more careful examination will convince us that there are nearly as many on the under side as on the upper. The leaves are all pointing outward from the branch and as nearly upward as is possible. In other words, the leaves grow toward the light. We must not forget to see how long the leaves of the Norway spruce persist and to find out when the leaf-scars disappear. We can find leaves that must surely be six or seven years old 46. Twig of the common Norway spruce. Half natural size. and sometimes we can find them even older than this. The leaf- scars, too, remain along time. The falling of the leaves is illus- trated in Fig. 46. It shows the extremities of a limb which is eight years old. The part between the tip and A is last season's growth ; between A and B it is two years old ; and beyond B is a part that grew three seasons ago. The section beyond C is six years old ; from C to D is seven years of age. The four years' growth of this limb not shown in the drawing was as densely covered with foliage as is the part shown in the upper figure ; but there are not many leaves between C and D (seven years old) and none on the eight-year-old wood (except those on the branchlets, and these are younger.) 156 The cone of the Norway spruce is nearly as long as that of the white pine, but it is not so rough and coarse as the white pine cone is. The cones are usually borne on the tips of small branch- lets, although occasionally one is found borne in the manner shown in Fig. 47. The cones usually fall the first winter. The Norway spruce is not a native of this country, but, like the Scotch and Austrian pines, it was introduced from Europe and is grown very widely as an ornamental tree. It is the commonest evergreen in yards and parks. THE BLACK SPRUCE AND ITS KIN. There are several different kinds of spruces which we find growing in our forests and swamps, and sometimes these are planted for ornament. A sprig of foliage and a cone of one of these, — the black spruce, — is shown in Fig. 48. The foliage is not very unlike that of the Norway spruce, but the cones are very small in comparison. They are about one inch long, though they vary considerably in size. Before they open they are oval or plum-shape, but when mature and the scales of the cone have expanded, they are nearly globular. They are often borne in clusters, as well as singly, and persist for many years after the seeds have fallen. The posi- tion of the cones will depend upon their age. When young, they point upward, but they gradually turn downward. The white spruce resembles the black very closely in general appearance. The leaves of the white spruce have a whitish or dusty looking tinge of color and when crushed or bruised, give forth a peculiar disagreeable odor. The cones vary in length from an inch to two inches, and in shape are more cylin- drical or finger-shaped than the cone of the black spruce. 47. Cone of Norway spruce. Half size. 157 The foliage of the red spruce lacks the whitish tinge of color of the white spruce and the cones, which are from one inch to two inches in length, are obovate in shape — that is, the widest place is through the upper part of the cone, and from this point it gradually tapers to the tip. They seldom persist longer than the second summer. The leaves of all these different kinds of spruces vary greatly in length, thickness and sharpness of point, according to the part of the tree on which they grow, and their surroundings. The shedding of the leaves on these or other spruces can be determined as easily as in the Norway spruce. These three spruces like a cold climate and grow in many sections of northern United States and Canada and farther 48. Black spruce. Half natural size. south in the mountains. They are sometimes all found growing together, but the black spruce likes best the damp, cold swamps, while the others grow best on the drier and better drained lands. The black spruce is commonest. The red spruce is least known. THK BALSAM FIR. This is another evergreen tree which grows naturally in the cold, damp grounds of the northern United States and Canada, and to some extent in the eastern states as far south as West Virginia. The foliage is borne in much the same manner as that of the spruces ; yet there are interesting differences in the characters of these two kinds of leaves. Perhaps the most noticeable difference is in the shape ; and the color of the fir leaves will attract our atten- tion because the under side is a silvery color, while the upper side is green. What is the nature of the tip of the leaf? and how does 158 it compare with the pines and spruces in this respect ? Does the leaf have a stem or petiole? or is it attached directly to the branches without any stem? How are the leaves shed ? The cones are about three inches long and present a rather delicate appearance. It will be interesting to determine the position of the cones, that is, the direction in which they point, and to learn if it is the same when they are young that it is after they have matured. The grayish colored bark of the trunk and limbs bears many *' blisters " from which Canada balsam is obtained. THE HEMLOCK. A hemlock twig is an interesting object. It may have many characters in common with the spruce and fir, yet the impression which we get from it, or from a large hemlock tree, is entirely distinct. The arrangement of the leaves and the gracefulness of the drooping branchlets are most pleasing. We are lead to examine it more closely. We notice that the leaves appear to be borne in two more or less regular rows, — one on each side of the branch or twig ; but in reality they come from all sides of the branch, and it is the position which the leaves assume that gives this two-rowed appearance. The leaves have a short petiole or stem, and this stem rests along the side of the branchlet in such a direction that the leaves are placed in single rows on either side of the branch. The petioles of the leaves are nearly parallel with the branch while the leaves often make a decided angle with the petiole. This fact can best be brought out by carefully examining a small twig. While we are noting the arrangement of the leaves on the branchlets, we should also take notice of the points of similar- ity and difference between these leaves and the spruces and firs. We shall find that there is more in common, at least so far as shape and color are concerned, between the hemlock and fir than between the hemlock and spruce. The small delicate cones, borne on the tips of the branchlets, will also attract our attention (Fig. 49.) We may wonder at their small size, for they are only about three-quarters of an inch long, and very delicate, yet a second glance at the tree will impress us with 159 the number of cones which the tree bears : and we conclude that, although the cones may be small, yet there are so many of them that there will be no lack of seeds. It is more difficult to trace the age of a hemlock limb than of many other kinds of trees, yet we can easily determine that many of the leaves are several years old when they fall. The bark of the hemlock is used in tanning leather. The tree is much used for lumber. Where does it grow ? THK ARBOR-VIT.^. One might almost wonder, at first sight, if the arbor-vitse (often, but wrongly, called white cedar) has any leaves at all. Spray of the hemlock. Two-thirds natural size. It does possess them, however, but they are very different in size and shape from any of the others which we have examined. They are small scale-like bodies, closely pressed together along the sides of the branchlets, in four rows. L,eaves pressed to the branches in this manner are said to be "appressed." The leaves of the arbor- vitae are so close together that they overlap one another. The leaves are of two distinct shapes, sometimes known as the surface leaves and the flank leaves. The former are located on what appears to be the flattened surface of the branch- lets, while the latter are on the sides or edges. See Fig. 50. If we carefully look at the leaves, we shall notice a raised spot i6o near the point or tip. This is said to be a resin gland. This gland can be seen more plainly on the surface leaves that are two years old. Most of the leaves persist for at least two and sometimes three years ; but even older ones can be found. These older leaves, however, do not exist as green active leaves, but merely as dried up and lifeless scales. These lifeless leaves, are probably detached from the branches by the forces of nature. The Arbor-vitae. Nearly full size. The cones are even smaller than the hemlock cones. They are borne in the axils of the leaves in the same manner as the branch- lets and are not conspicuous unless one is close to the tree. The arbor- vitae is much planted for hedges and screens, as well as for other ornamental purposes. There are many horticultural varieties. The tree is abundant in a wild state in New York. Summary on the Kinds of Common Evergreens. The white pine (Pinus Strobus). — Leaves in clusters of five, soft and slender ; cones five or six inches long, slightly curved ; bark smooth except on the trunks and larger limbs of old trees, where it is fissured. The pitch pine (Pinus rigida). — Leaves in clusters of three, from three to four inches long, rather rigid ; cones two to three inches long, often in clusters of two or more but frequently borne singly, persisting long after the seeds have been shed ; bark more or less rough on the young growth and deeply fissured on the trunks of old trees. The Scotch pine (Pinus sylvestris). — Leaves usually in clusters of two, from two to four inches long, rigid, of a bluish-green hue when seen in a large mass on the tree ; cones two to three inches long and the scales tipped with a beak or prickle. The Austrian pine (Pinus Austriaca). — Leaves in clusters of two, five or six inches long and somewhat rigid, dark green in color and persisting for four or five years ; cones about three inches long, conical in shape and scales not beaked or pointed as in the Scotch pine. The Norway spruce (Picea excelsa). — Leaves borne singly, about one inch long, dark green, four sided ; cones about six inches long, and composed of thin scales, and usually borne on the tips of branchlets. The small branches mostly drooping. The black spruce (Picea nigra). — In general appearance, this is not very unlike the Norway spruce, but the small branches stand out more horizontally and the cones are only one or one and one-half inches long, recurving on short branches. The cones persist for several years after shedding the seed. 71ie white spruce (Picea alba). — Leaves about one inch long, having a glaucous or whitish tinge ; twigs stout and rigid, of a pale greenish white color ; cones from one to two and one- half inches long, more or less cylindrical or " finger-shape," and easily crushed when dry. The red spruce (Picea rubra). — The foliage lacks the whitish tinge of the white pruce and is of a dark or dark yellowish color ; twigs stouter than those of the black spruce and not 162 so much inclined to droop ; cones about one inch long, obovate and usually falling by second summer. The hemlock (Tsuga Canadensis). — Leaves about one-half inch long, flat with rounded point, green on the upper side, whit- ish beneath, and borne on short appressed petioles ; cones about three-quarters of an inch long, oval or egg-shape, and borne on the ends of small branchlets and often persisting for some time. The balsam fir (Abies balsamea). — Leaves narrow, less than one inch long, borne singly, very numerous and standing out from the branchlets in much the way of the spruce ; cones about three inches long, cylindrical, composed of thin scales and standing upright on the branches, or recurved ; bark smooth, light green with whitish tinge. The arbor-vita (Thuya occidentalis) . — Leaves very small, scale- like and over lapping one another in four rows, adher- ing closely to the branchlets ; the cones oblong and small, — a half inch or less in length, — and composed of but few scales. For further information respecting nature-study, address, Bureau of Nature- Study* Cornell University, Ithaca, N. Y. Or, I. P. Roberts, Director College of Agriculture. L. H. Bailey, Chief of Bureau of Nature- Study and Reading -Course. John W. Spencer, Deputy Chief. Bulletin 68. August, 1894. Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station. HORTICULTURAL DIVISION. The Cultivated Poplars; WITH REMARKS UPON THE PLANTING OF GROUNDS. By L. H. BAILEY. PUBLISHED BY THEC UNIVERSITY. ITHACA, N. Y. 1894. ORGANIZATION. BOARD OF CONTROL: THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY. STATION COUNCIL. President, JACOB GOULD SCHURMAN. Hon. A. D. WHITE, - Trustee of the University. Hon. JOHN B. BUTCHER, - President State Agricultural Society. Professor I. P. ROBERTS, - Agriculture. Professor G. C. CAUDWELL, - Chemistry. Professor JAMES LAW, - Veterinary Science. Professor A. N. PRENTISS, Botany. Professor J. H. COMSTOCK, - Entomology. Professor L. H. BAILEY, - Horticulture. Professor H. H. WING, Dairy Husbandry. Professor G. F. ATKINSON, Cryptogatnic Botany. OFFICERS OF THE STATION. I. P. ROBERTS, Director. E. L. WILLIAMS, - - Treasurer. H. W. SMITH, Clerk. ASSISTANTS. M. V. SLINGERLAND, Entomology. GEO. C. WATSON, - Agriculture. G. W. CAVANAUGH, - Chemistry. E. G. LODEMAN, . ... Horticulture. Office of the Director, 20 Morrill Hall. Those desiring this Bulletin sent to friends will please send us the names of the parties. BULLETINS OF 1894. 62. The Japanese Plums in North America. 63. Co-operative Test of Sugar Beets. 64. On Certain Grass-Eating Insects. 65. Tuberculosis in Relation to Animal Industry and Public Health. 66. Test of Cream Separators. 67. Some Recent Chinese Vegetables. 68. The Cultivated Poplars. THE CULTIVATED POPLARS. I. GENERAL REMARKS. There has been little attempt in experiment station literature to discuss matters of ornamental gardening. The so-called practical problems connecting directly with bread-winning have necessarily and properly absorbed the energies of investigators. But the ornamentation of rural and suburban homes is quite as much within the province of experiment station work ; and it should also be remembered that the growing of plants is itself an indus- try which enlists a vast amount of capital, and this nursery busi- ness has received little direct and explicit aid from experiment station publications. The present essay is undertaken for the double purpose of explaining certain fundamental principles in landscape gardening — a subject to which the poplars readily lend themselves — and of unraveling a web of difficulties respecting the species and varieties of poplars, into which the nursery catalogues seem to have fallen. An investigation of the botanical and horti- cultural features of the poplars has been assiduously prosecuted for upwards of two years, and the writer has had the free use of var- ious nurseries and plantations in Western New York and the aid of botanists in many parts of the country. As a group, the pop- lars possess comparatively small value in landscape planting, but this very fact affords me the opportunity I seek to press home the fallacy of certain common practices amongst planters. At the outset, I must be allowed to explain that landscape gar- dening is the embellishment of grounds in such fashion that they shall possess landscape or nature-like effects. This definition at once removes from our consideration all the formal effects of flower-beds and sheared trees, which, while useful at times, bear no closer relation to landscape gardening than a cup of paint bears to the fine art of painting. In other words, a landscape garden — and that should mean every country yard, however small or sim- ple— should have in it the elements of a picture. It should appear to have one thought or feeling running through it all, and this is 206 BULLETIN 68. a condition which is impossible when trees or bushes or flower- beds are scattered all over the place, for in such case one is at- tracted by these individual and detached objects and is not particularly impressed with the place as a whole or as a unit. Such a yard is a nursery. An artist would not care to paint such an area. If a yard is to be a picture, it must have a sense of frame- work about it, — certain strong groups of bushes or trees about the borders, and the central area should be a more or less open greensward with very cautious planting. The different parts are then in masses or in bold contrast, and the place has character. At the same time, the partial shutting off of the surrounding areas sets bounds to the place, defines it, and makes it to appear personal, snug and home-like. One should learn that it is not plants which make a place attractive, but the arrangement of plants. In fact, many otherwise attractive places are ruined by a wealth of good plants scattered without purpose over the lawn. It is but a corollary of this discussion to say that plants which are simply odd or grotesque or unusual should be used with the great- est caution, for they introduce extraneous and jarring effects. They are little in sympathy with a true landscape garden. An artist would not care to paint an evergreen sheared into some gro- tesque shape. It is too formal and it has no elements of true beauty. It is simply curious, and shows what a man with plenty of time and long pruning shears can accomplish. This leads me to one of the proper subjects of this paper, the planting of the Lombardy poplar. Fortunately, this tree is less planted in New York than in many western states. Its chief merits to the average planter are the quickness of its growth and the readiness with which it multiplies by cuttings. But in the north it is apt to be a short-lived tree and it suffers from storms, and it has few really useful qualities. It may be used to some advantage in windbreaks for peach orchards and other short-lived plantations, as explained in Bulletin 9 of this station ; but after a few years a screen of I^ombardies begins to fail and the habit of suckering from the root adds to its undesirable features. For shade, it has little merit, and for timber none. People like it because it is striking, and this, in an artistic sense, is its gravest fault. It is unlike anything else in our landscape, and doesjnot THE CULTIVATED POPLARS. 207 fit into our scenery well. The Lombardy should rarely, if ever, be seen as a single specimen ; and above all, its formality and stiffness should not be emphasized by planting it in rows along country roads. A row of lyombardies along a roadside is like a row of exclamation points ! But the tree can often be used to good effect as one factor in a group of trees, where its spire-like shape, towering above the sur- rounding foliage, ^^^^^™ may lend a spirit- ed charm to the landscape. It combines well in such groups if it stands in visual nearness to ch im- neys or other tall formal objects. Then it gives a sort of architect- ural finish and spirit to a group of trees ; but the effect is general- ly lessened, if not altogether spoiled, if more than one Lom- bardy is in view. One or two speci- mens may often be used to give vigor to heavy plantations about low build- ings, and the ef- fect is generally best if they are seen beyond or at the rear of the building. Now and then one Attractive Group oj Lombardy Poplars. 208 BULLETIN 68. sees a picturesque clump of L,ombardies standing alone, like that shown upon page 207. Here the one original tree has given rise to a varied progeny of sprouts, and the mass has a freeness of outline which can never be obtained in a regularly planted clump of these trees from which the suckers are continually removed. This partic- ular clump is one of the most picturesque objects in a sweeping landscape near Perry City, Schuyler County, N. Y., but its excel- lence is purely accidental. Another feature of common ornamental planting which is well illustrated in the use of poplars, is the desire for plants simply because they grow rapidly. A very rapid-growing tree nearly always produces cheap effects. This is well illustrated in the common planting of willows and poplars about summer places on lake shores. Their effect is almost wholly one of cheapness and temporariness. There is little that suggests strength or durability in willows and poplars, and for this reason they should always be used as minor or secondary features in ornamental or home grounds. , Where quick results are desired, nothing is better to plant than these trees, but better trees, like maples, oaks, or elms, should be planted with them and the poplars and willows should be removed as fast as the other species begin to afford protection. When the plantation finally assumes its permanent characters, a few of the remaining poplars and willows, judiciously left, may afford very excellent effects ; but no one who has an artist's feel- ing would be content to construct the frame work of his place of these rapid-growing and soft- wooded trees. I have said that the legitimate use of poplars in ornamental grounds is the production of minor or secondary effects. As a rule, they are less adapted to isolated planting as specimen trees than to use in composition, — that is, as parts of general groups of trees, where their characters will serve to break the monotony of heavier foliage. The poplars are gay trees, as a rule, especially those, like the aspens, which have a trembling foliage. Their leaves are bright and the tops are thin. A few of them injudi- cious positions give a place a sprightly air. I especially love the common aspen or Populus tremuloides of our woods (Ffg. 14). Its light dancing foliage and silver-gray limbs always cheer me, and its autumn color is one of the purest golden-yellows of our land- THE CULTIVATED POPLARS. 209 scapes. I like to see a tree of it standing out in front of a group of maples or evergreens. Its whole attitude is then one of famir- - iarity. The cottonwood is perhaps the best of all our poplars as a single specimen. It makes a noble tree, spreading its gray branches far and wide. But like the aspen, it is cheerful and restive. One is not moved to lie under it, as he is under a maple or an oak. Its leaves rustle with the lightest movement of air. The ripple of its foliage always recalls to my mind the play of wavelets upon a pebbly shore. The day is never so dark, but the cottonwood reflects a flood of light. Some of the forms of the black poplar of Kurope are especially satisfactory for the production of lively effects in planting. Of these, I know of none better than the form known to nurserymen as Populus elegans. It has a most pleasing light and tremulous foliage, the effect of which is heightened by a twiggy character of growth and a reddish cast to the leaf-stalks and young shoots. It is an elegant tree, and well adapted to planting in front of heavier foliage in the most conspicuous portion of the grounds. Some of the silver or white-leaved poplars produce the most striking contrasts of foliage, especially if set near darker trees. Bolle's poplar {Populus Bolleana of the nurseries) is one of the best of these trees. Its habit is something like that of the L,ombardy. The upper surface of the deeply lobed leaves is dark dull green, while the under surface is almost snowy white. Such emphatic trees as this should generally be partially obscured, by planting them in amongst other trees so that they appear to mix with the other foliage, or else they should be seen at some distance. Other varieties of the common white poplar or abele are occasionally useful, although most of them sprout badly and may become a nuisance. But the planting of these immodest trees is so likely to be overdone that I scarcely dare recommend them, although, when skilfully used, they may be made to produce most excellent effects. If any reader has a particular fondness for trees of this class (or any others with woolly-white foliage) and if he has only an ordinary farm-yard to ornament, let him reduce his desires to a single tree, and then if that tree is planted well on the inside of a group of other trees, no harm can result ! 2io BULLETIN 68. There are various weeping and grotesque horticultural varieties of the poplars, as of other trees. Concerning the use of these, I need only say that they are curiosities and that they should not be given prominent positions directly in front of the house. I think that no one will care to dispute me if I say that a person who fills his front yard with such specimens, has little apprecia- tion of natural objects. A few grotesque specimens in positions of secondary importance may be desirable, as in a side or back yard, but one will find that the more he cultivates a love of nat- ural scenery the less he cares for mere monstrosities. I may seem to have placed myself in the position of writing a bulletin upon a group of trees which, upon the whole, I should be quite as willing to discourage as to augment ; but my object has been rather more, as I intimated at the outset, to point out certain common defects in habits of thinking about ornamental trees, and to discourage the use of trees simply because they are odd, quick-growing and cheap. I wish that there were fewer L/ombardy poplars in many parts of the country, fewer of the ugly white or silver poplars, and more of the American and European aspens, of the large-toothed aspen, of the cottonwood, and the Russian Certinensis poplar. Many of the species are excellent for covering sand-hills — for which the white poplar is well suited — or rough or waste places, and they are capable of adding much light and cheer to a yard. But planters are too prone to use certain ones over freely. Poplars are often disagreeable upon the lawn because of the abundance of down or wool which they give to every breeze in May and June, when the seed-pods burst. There is really little occasion for this annoyance, however. The poplars are dioecious, — that is, the male and female flowers are upon different trees (although bath sexes are rarely upon the same trees in the cot- tonwood). Nurserymen, therefore, should grow only the male specimens. The cuttings from a male tree — or one producing no cottony seeds — will give progeny of the same character. Of the L,ombardy, there is only the male sex in the country, the female never having been introduced, or at least not distributed, so far as I know ; while the weeping willow is represented only by the female plant. Some of the speciesand varieties are worth plant- THE CULTIVATED POPLARS. 211 ing for the catkins which are produced so freely in early spring. The European aspen (Populus Tremula) is particularly desirable in this respect (Fig. 13); and this species also has a most interesting habit and foliage. It should be said, in passing, that most of the poplars are hardy trees and thrive in a great variety of trying situations. This, together with the ease of propagation and their cheapness, combined with free and rapid growth, makes them the best of trees for nurse plantations, — that is, for temporary shelter for other trees and bushes. In this respect the common aspen poplar is one of the most valuable of all trees in the reforestation of American lands. It springs up quickly in clearings, and during its comparatively short life holds the soil and protects other vege- tation and finally contributes its own substance to the mainten- ance of the stronger forests. In this manner it has exerted a most powerful effect upon the configuration of our forest areas and upon the fertility of the land from remote time. The same qualities make it valuable, in many instances, in extensive ornamental plantings. The recent introduction of Russian poplars has added consid- erable confusion to nursery lists, and it was this fact which first led me to take up this inquiry. The chief merit of the Russian trees is for planting in the northwestern prairie states, but all of them are worth attention for exposed localities in this state, as well as for ornamental planting. I am convinced that the so-called Populus Certinensis (properly P. laurifolia) is one of the very best trees to plant where quick results are wanted and where some feeling of strength and durability is also desired. The best dis- cussion of these Russian poplars which I know is contained in Bulletin No. 9 of the Minnesota Experiment Station by Professor S. B. Green, published in 1889. The following is a more recent sketch of these trees by the same author, prepared for this occa- sion : "Russian Poplars in the Northwest. — In the arboretum of the Minnesota Experiment Station are 1 2 kinds of Russian poplars that were received from the Iowa Agricultural College. Most of them have been grown in our collection for seven years, and some of them have been tried for a much longer period in other parts 212 BULLETIN 68. of Minnesota, in Iowa and the Dakotas, but not long enough any- where in this country to warrant final conclusions. Those who live in locations naturally in timber can hardly understand the importance of the genus, to which these trees belong, to the pio- neers on the wind swept prairies. The ease with which many of them are increased, their rapidity of growth, great hardiness against extremes of heat and cold, excessive moisture, and pro- longed drouth, make them widely sought as pioneer trees in most severe locations, for the formation of wind-breaks and for shade from the scorching sun. "I would not be understood as recommending the general planting of poplars where our finer deciduous trees readily suc- ceed, but for a strong effect in the shortest time in severe locations they have no rival except the large growing willows, which may generally be used with them to advantage. Among the collec- tion of poplars commonly referred to as of Russian origin, are trees having a great variety in growth and foliage, so that by the judicious use of them alone one can secure very good effects in landscape planting. They are not, however, and never have been, represented as new species, but as hardier forms of species already introduced into this country, and in the following notes I have- grouped the kinds under the several heads where they evi- dently belong, using their nursery or horticultural names. Aside from the few exceptions noted, they are all easily increased from hard wood cuttings made in the fall or spring. ' ' ANGULATA CLASS — Young growth plainly marked with ridges or angles. Dudley's Popuhts [properly P. balsamifera, var. viminalis\. Growth only moderate ; when young rather upright in habit, but somewhat pendulous when old. Our older specimens have been badly injured by leaf rust in dry summers, and on this account I have ceased propagating it. The leaves are broadly lanceolate, very wavy on the edges and the young branches very angular. ' ' P. betulifolia is probably the same species as P. nigra of the eastern nurseries. It makes a tree that is rather open in habit, inclining to a straight trunk with branches coming out at nearly right angles. The foliage remains bright and fresh even in dry sod land in severe seasons. It is not especially valuable for tim- THE CULTIVATED POPLARS. 213 ber but 'is interesting and useful for contrasting with other trees ; leaves very thick, very large and broadly deltoid, much larger and broader than leaves of the cotton wood under like conditions. ' ' Wobsky Poplar. One of the most distinct of its class ; of rapid growth and open regular habit. As a timber tree it is up- right and valuable, but it seems to be more susceptible to the work of the poplar borer than other kinds and it occasionally loses its foliage in dry places. On account of these weaknesses it will not be largely planted in this section, but occasional trees may often be used to give variety. The leaves are large, ovate heart-shaped, stiff and very flat, of a shiny blue-green color on the upper and a light green on the lower side. Buds large and sticky. The young growth is only slightly angular. ' ' P. Certinensis \P. laurifolia of botanists] was introduced into this country and disseminated by Arnold Arboretum. It is per- haps the best of the collection for general prairie and ornamental planting in this section ; perfectly hardy even in the severest ex- posures and rarely, if ever, affected with leaf rust which so often checks the growth of the cotton wood. Its timber makes very good siding for buildings and floors, and answers many of the purposes for which pine is generally used. It does not warp or crack like our native cottonwood. It is rather upright in form, with thick leathery leaves and of very rapid growth. It does not grow quite as fast as the native cottonwood nor resist the attacks of the leaf beetle so successfully, but it is a much longer-lived tree and stands close planting very much better. It is grown readily from cuttings, which in our forest plantation made a growth of a trifle aver 12 feet in three years from half-inch cut- tings planted eight inches apart in rows eight feet asunder. The leaves are thick and leathery with a wavy edge. The new wood is strongly angular. [The form of leaf is shown in Figs. 7 and 8.] "The Populus Petrovski so closely resembles P. Certinensis that I think them one arid the same thing. Professor Budd ob- taided this in Russia and thinks it different from the latter. If this is true it does not show its characteristics until older than any specimen we have. 214 BULLETIN 68. " The poplar known as P. pyramidalis wc.fastigiata is evident- ly the Russian form of the Lombardy, if not the same thing. It has been introduced in the hope that it would prove hardier and longer lived than the common form, but in our experience of some seven years, young trees of either form have never been in- jured in this vicinity. It may, however, prove to be a longer lived tree than the common Lombardy, which is well known to be quite hardy, even in somewhat severe locations, when young, but to be very short lived on the dry prairies of the Northwest. It is, however, interesting to know that while the common Lom- bardy poplar is an almost worthless tree in most parts of Minne- sota, yet near Duluth and along Lake Superior it is quite a success. " BALSAMIPKRA CLASS. — With large sticky buds and young gi owths free from ridges or angles. 11 Populus balsamifera of Asia, as we have it, is probably the type of which P. laurifolia and P. Sibirica var. pyramidalis of horticulturists are but variations. The lamented Chas. Gibb said he saw in the botanical gardens at Kazan a specimen of this two feet in diameter and 50 feet high, and although it resembled P. Sibirica when young, it is quite different from it in form when old. Hither of the next two kinds are preferable to it for planting, as the leaves of this have an unpleasant way of curling together. "P. Sibirica var. pyramidalis [a form of P. balsamifera, var. intermedia of botanists] , makes a fair growth and is desirable for ornamental planting. I think the foliage will endure more hard- ship than the P. balsamifera, to which it is similar in form. " P. laurifolia [of horticulturists, but P. balsamifera, var. intermedia of botanists] is the best of this class. It is little slower growth than the P. Certinensis but like it healthy, vigorous and a good timber tree, and much superior to the cottonwood for lum- ber or fuel. Its thick leaves withstand the hottest, dryest air of the West, either standing alone or in shelter belts. The leaves are thick and leathery, oval in form, a smooth clear white on the under side, and a bright clear green on the upper ; generally flat, but sometimes a little folded. ' ' WHITE POPLAR CLASS. — The typical Russian form of this is rather more upright than the common white poplar and does not THE CULTIVATED POPLARS. 215 sprout so much. This latter quality will be considered desirable by growers of occasional specimens. On the other hand, it is not so easily propagated as the common form and is perhaps, no hard- ier, so that it will not supplant it for forest plantations where the beautiful white, fine-grained wood of this species is desired, and where the habit of sprouting from the roots is no drawback. ' ' P. alba var. Bolleana is very different from the common white I I i ! i. WINTER TWIGS OF POPLARS. — a, b, c, d, forms of Populus grandiden- tata ; e, P. angustifolia ; f, P. nigra, var. elegans ; g, P. balsamifera, var. latif olia (Nolestii] ; h, P. nigra (Eugenie] ; i, P. monilifera ; j, P. laurifolia (Certinensis) ; k, P. balsamifera, var. viminalis ; 1, P. nigra (form known as Canescens] ; m, P. alba, var. canescens ; n, P. alba, var. nivea ; o, P. alba. poplar, which it resembles in foliage and bark, but its leaves are nearly as deeply lobed as those of the common silver maple ; on the upper side they are of a rich dark green color, while on the lower side they have a very heavy coat of white down. Its growth when young is nearly as upright as the L,ombardy poplar with a tendency to a globular formed head when old. It is, how- ever, a long lived tree even in severely dry sections in the West, where the Lombardy poplar is worthless. It is of rather moder- ate or slow growth. I find it much more difficult to propagate than most other poplars, but have had fairly good success with cuttings taken off in the fall, and well callused before planting. 216 BULLETIN 68. in the spring, in the same manner as practiced with grape cuttings in the West. It grafts readily on several of our common poplars and on strong growing kinds its growth is considerably increased. "P. alba var. argentea closely resembles the species but has heavier down on the underside, and is rather more spreading in habit, and is more easily propagated from cuttings." II. THE CULTIVATED SPECIES OF POPLARS. The following catalogue attempts to refer the nursery and horti- cultural names of pop- lars to their proper botanical species, and it includes various notes upon the horti- cultural values of the different types. The genus appears to be much confused amongst nurserymen, and the perplexity has been increased by the arrival of the Russian varieties. In the pre- paration of this monographic list, I have received the greatest aid from the collection of EHwanger & Barry, which has been freely placed at my disposal. The winter twigs are often useful in distinguishing the species, and I have therefore inserted a photograph (Fig. i) of some of them. GROUP I. BALSAM POPLARS, or those with resinous-sticky more or less elongated buds. i. Populus angfustifolia (James, Long's Exped. i-497). YELLOW or BLACK POPLAR of the west. Fig. 2. A pyramidal small tree with ovate-lanceolate willow-like leaves and cylindri- cal twigs, native from South Dakota west and south. It is spar- ingly cultivated. It is a tree of good habit and soft clear green 2. Populus angus- tifolia. (% nat. size. ) THE CULTIVATED POPLARS. 217 foliage, and is worth attention in the composition of groups. May be confounded with Populusbalsamifera, var. viminalis, which see. The slender, cylindrical winter twigs with small buds (e, fig.i) are very different from the heavier and angled shoots, with coarse buds, of the other (k, fig. i). 2. Populus balsamifera (Linnaeus, Sp. PI. 1034 (1753)- BALSAM POPLAR, TACMAHAC. Fig. 3. A tall upright tree, with a nairow straight top, growing in woods and along streams in the Northernmost States, and also in Northern Europe and Asia. Leaves thick and firm, erect, whitened beneath, usually smaller than in most other poplars of this Group : in shape ovate- lanceolate or oval, taper- ing towards the top and sometimes at the base, finely and obtusely toothed. Young branches nearly or quite cylindri- cal. The native form is occasionally seen about farm buildings and road- sides, where it makes a durable and pleasant tree ; but it is most too stiff for the pleasantest effects and too narrow for the best shade. The dull whiteness of the under side of the leaves affords a pleasant variety and contrast in its foliage, and the fragrance of the resinous buds in spring is pleas- ant to most persons. It is a desirable tree for occasional plant- ing, but, like the Lombardy, it generally appears to best advant- age when placed amongst other trees. It is a hardier tree than the Lombardy, and does not run quickly to such extravagant heights. In cultivation from Russian sources, it is known as Nos. 1 6 and 26 Voronesh and 32 Riga. Fig. 3 shows ordinary foliage (16 Voronesh) about half size. The balsam poplar is probably the most variable of poplars. j. Fopulus balsamifera (16 Voronesh.} nat. size.} 218 BULLETIN 68. In cultivation in this country it is represented by no less than three well marked botanical varieties, differing from the species and from each other in the habit of growth, shape and color of leaves and character of twigs. P. balsamifera variety intermedia (Loudon, Encyc. of Trees and Shrubs, 830 (1842). P. laurifolia of American horticulturists, not of botanists. P. Sibirica pyramidalis, of horticulturists). Fig. 4. A com- paratively slow growing tree of close upright habit, from Northern Eur- ope, where it is used as a street tree. The leaves are very thick and hard, finely nat. serrate, oval in outline, and prominently whitened beneath, and they are commonly rather small for this group. Twigs hard and cylindrical. It is considered to be a valuable tree for hot and dry interior climates ; and it also has distinct merit for ornamental planting. It eventually becomes a large tree. The Populus laurifolia and P. Sibirica pyramidalis of American nurserymen are, so far as I can determine, only minor variations of one varietal type. All these trees are amongst the recent introductions of Russian poplars. P. balsamifera var. viminalis, (Loudon, Encyc. 830, t. 1510. P. viminalis, L,odd. Cat. (1836). P. Lindleyana, Booth, Rev. Hort. 1867, 380. P. salicifolia, P. crispa, P. Dudleyi, and P. pyramidalis suaveolens of horticulturists. Also sometimes called P. laurifolia]. Fig. 5. A tree of only moderate and rather slen- der growth, with a partial weeping habit when old ; native to northern Europe. It is at once distinguished from other forms of Populus balsamifera by its sharply angled twigs (k, fig. i), and broad-lanceolate willow-like leaves which are finely serrate and often crinkled-margined. balsamifera variety intermedia, size. THE CULTIVATED POPLARS. 219 I am inclined to regard this as a distinct species from the balsam poplar. If it should be elevated to specific rank, it would be difficult to determine a correct name for it. Its first specific name is evidently L,oddige's, Populus viminalis, but that was only a catalogue name and therefore could not hold under the recent rules of botanical nomenclature. Populus Lindleyana was regu- larly published in 1867, but this name appears to have been used by horticulturists for a form of the cotton wood. The other names which it bears are used only by gardeners and nurserymen. 4. Populus balsamifera var. viminalis. (}4 nat. size.} But however much doubt may attach to the botanical position of this small tree, it is valuable to planters if a tree of willow- like aspect but with more pronounced color effects and greater size and durability is desired. It is very like the native Populus angustifolia, which it represents in Europe, but is readily distin- guished by its angled or furrowed stems, and less tapering and 220 BULLETIN 68. crisped leaves which are conspicuously finely reticulated and whitened beneath. The color of its foliage is a grayish green, and in this respect it affords a contrast to the native species. The native seems to be rather the better tree of the two, although the viminalis has a more striking appearance. P. balsamifera, var. latifolia (London, En- cyc. 830. P. Nolestii and P. Wobsky of horticultur- ists). Fig. 6. — This var- iety includes Asiatic forms with ovate or cord- ate-ovate rather blunt pointed leaves, cylin- drical twigs (or slightly ridged on strong shoots) (g, fig. i ) and the gen- eral habit of the balsam poplar. The leaves are usually large and thick, shining green above and dull white beneath, in shape and texture some- what like the next species (P. candicans}. The Nolestii poplar is now sold by Eastern nurserymen as an ornamental tree. Its strong habit and dark foliage adapt it admirably to planting near the rear borders of grounds. The Wobsky poplar is one of the recent Russian introductions, with somewhat the habit of a cherry tree, and is much prized in the northwest. The Rasu- movskoe poplar appears to be of the same type. 3. Populus candicans(Aiton, Hort. Kew. iii. 406. P. bal- samifera, var. candicans, Gray, Manual, 2nd ed. 419. P. Ontari en- sis and P. macrophylla of European horticulturists). BALM OF GILEAD. Fig. on title page. — A strong-growing spreading native tree, frequently planted, and esteemed for its vigor and hardiness and the resinous fragrance of its large buds in spring-time. The leaves are broad and heart-shaped, green above and veiny and rusty- white beneath, and the leaf-stalk is usually hairy and somewhat 6. Populus balsamifera var. latifolia. not. size. ) THE CULTIVATED POPLARS. 221 flattened. It is very different from the balsam poplar in method of growth, as it has none of the pyramidal or spire-like tendency of that species, but usually makes a broad and irregularly spread- ing top. While the tree is common in cultivation, it is rare wild. In the early days, however, it was found in very large trees in Michigan and other western states, and was used for sawing timber ; and isolated natural groves of it are still occasionally seen.* The balm of gilead makes a good street tree, and is per- haps the best of the poplars for shade. Well grown trees have the darkest and richest foliage of any common poplar, and this character makes the tree valuable in heavy groups about the borders of a place. The top is liable to become open and broken with age, however, and the tree often sprouts profusely. It is not well adapted to smoky and dusty locations, as it soon becomes grimmy. It was used to good purpose in the lagoon borders of the World's Fair, where its exuberant growth and stiff heavy leaves gave a massive effect. The illustration upon the title-page shows a spray of the balm of gilead, one- third natural size. 4. Populus Simonii (Carriere, Rev. Hort. 1867, 360). — A strong strict tree from China, whence it was introduced into France about 1861 by M. E- Simon. It is now very sparingly planted in this country, but its merits are scarcely known. In foliage it is much like the next species (P. laurifolia). Its leaves differ from those of the balm of gilead in having a rounded or tapering base and much finer teeth, but otherwise they are much alike. The shoots are reddish brown and spotted, and deeply grooved. Professor Craig, of the Central Experimental Farm, Ottawa, Ontario, who has had considerable experience with the tree, writes as follows concerning it : ' ' The tree in nursery and on the lawn is a very strong grower, with large ovate leaves, having the characteristic five- sided shoots of these Russian poplars. It grows very rapidly, making a growth of from six to ten feet per annum. I have not known it to winter kill either here or in Manitoba. It can hardly be termed strikingly ornamental, but is useful for planting Botanical Gazette, v. 91. 222 BULLETIN 68. 7. Populus laurifolia (or P. Certinensis). Slow-grow- ing shoot. ( 2/T, nat. size. ) where wind- breaks are de- sired quickly. Like the Car- olina poplar, it has a strong upright habit of growth." 5. Popu- lus laurifo- lia (lyedebour Icones Planta- rum Nov. Ross. v. 23, t. 479 (1834). P. balsami- f era, \&r. laur- ifolia, Wes- mael, D. C. Prodr. xvi. part ii. 330. P. Certinensis, P. Petrovski and P. Bereolensis of American horticulturists). CERTINENSIS POPLAR, Figs. 7, 8 ; j. fig. i. — This Siberian species is the most important of the recently introduced poplars. It is a very rapid-growing and hardy tree, with a strong central leader, and a very heavy dense foliage. It is the Old World representative of our cotton wood. The foliage upon the old wood or upon slow-growing shoots (Fig. 7) is very unlike that upon the vigorous branches, and it is almost identical with that of the balsam poplar, being broadly oval, with finely serrate margins, and whitish beneath. The twigs, also, are cylindrical. But the strong shoots are THE CULTIVATED POPLARS. 223 strongly angled or grooved and the foliage is much like that of the native cottonwood but darker ; and the growth is more close and erect. The sketch in Fig. 8 distinguishes the leaves perfectly, however : P. laurifolia or Certinensis P. monilifera or Cottonwood (upper leaf). Leaves broad-ovate (lower leaf). Leaves triangu- in outline, with a rounded or lar-ovate in outline, with a tapering base and rather short straight or truncate base and a point at the apex ; the margin long point at the apex ; margin rather closely toothed, wavy ; coarsely scallop-toothed, plane; leaf-stalk comparatively short, leaf-stalk long, much flattened only moderately flattened, gland- beneath the blade of the leaf, less at the top ; stipules present and commonly bearing two or and conspicuous. Bud long, three gland-like bodies at its Shoots slightly hairy. top; stipules absent or minute (falling early). Bud shorter. Shoots glabrous. I imagine that the similarity of the Certinensis poplar and cot- tonwood has been the means of confusing them, for I have pop- lars under the names of P. laurifolia and Riga No. 40, which are cottonwoods. Whether these were really introduced from Russia after having first been introduced there from America, or whether the confusion is a mixing in our own plantations, I am unable to say. The Certinensis poplar is a more rugged tree than the cot- tonwood, with healthier foliage in the presence of leaf-rust, and its wood is said to be valuable. It is now much planted in the Northwest, and deserves to be more widely distributed. Its effect in the landscape is considerably unlike that of the cottonwood. Its leaves out stand more horizontally, while those of the cottonwood hang loosely and often vertically and therefore give the tree top a heavier look. The terminal spray of the two is particularly distinguishable in this regard. The leaves of Cer- tinensis upon the strong erect shoots stand almost squarely at right angles with the shoot, and, at some distance, therefore pre- sent only their ruffled edges to the eye, producing a most unique and picturesque effect. But on the whole, at least for the present, I should consider the cottonwood the better tree for ornamental planting in this state. 224 68. Professor Craig, of Ottawa, writes of the species : "I have been sending out cuttings of these so-called Russian poplars to Manitoba and the Northwest Territories for the past four years. The species which has given best satisfaction so far is one called Populus Certi- nensis. It resists drouth and cold remarkably well, and is looked upon by the settlers of the Northwest Ter- ritories as one of their most valu- able shelter and timber trees.' ' The Certinen- sis poplar was used in the la- goon plantations at the World's Fair, but because of its rapid growth in the direction of its leader, it made a less picturesque small tree than either the cotton wood or balm of gilead, which were similarly planted. 8. Certinensis poplar (above) , and Cottonwood (below}. z nal. size. THE CULTIVATED POPLARS. 225 The name laurifolia, or "laurel-leaved," is generally applied in this country to another plant, — Populus balsamifera, var. inter- media. The name originated with the Russian botanist L,edebour, and he published a good illustration of the tree he had in mind and it is an admirable portrait of the large and crinkly leaves of the tree which in this country goes under the name of Populus Certinensis, — a name which, so far as I can learn, is simply a garden or nursery name. No. 39 Riga, as I have it, is the same. Neither am I able to distinguish the tree grown in this country as Populus Bereolensis. Koch* mentions a Populus hybrida Berolinensis as being a hybrid between P. balsamifera and the Italian poplar (or Lombardy), but his tree is probably not the same as the one grown in this country. 6. Populus monilifera (Aiton, Hort. Kew. iii. 406 (1789). P. angulata, Aiton, Hort. Kew. iii. 407. P. Caro- Imensis, Moench, Verzeichniss Weissenstein, 81 (1785 : Catalogue name). P.glandu- losa, Moench, Meth- odus, 339 (1794)- P. Canadensis, Michx. f. Hist. Arb. Am. iii. 302, t. 12. P. Carolina of nurserymen). 9' p°Pulusmonilifera^unu^^lform. (% nat.size.} COTTONWOOD, CAROLINA and CANADIAN POPLAR. Fig. 8, 9; i, fig. i . A strong growing handsome tree of large size, ranging from Dendrologie. ii. iA, 497. 226 BULLETIN 68 western New England to Florida and the Rocky Mountains. Its leaf characters are sufficiently outlined above (under P. laurifolia) , but it is variable in shape and color of leaves. Some of the forms are fairly distinct in foliage and aspect, and they appear to be associated with particular horticultural names, in the nurseries. Fig. 9 shows a form with very long-pointed and round-based leaves; but it usually bears, also, the typical triangular foliage. Some of the most ornamental specimens of cottonwood are those which have reddish leaf-stalks and midribs. Taking all things into consideration, the cottonwood is prob- ably the best of the poplars for general ornamental planting. It grows rapidly and in almost every soil, and yet it possesses an air of strength and durability which most of the poplars lack. Its foliage is always bright and glossy, and the constant movement of the broad rich green leaves gives it an air of cheeriness which few trees possess. The tree has been much used upon the western prairies and in western towns, much too abundantly for good landscape effects. The rapid growth of the tree gives a feeling of luxuriance to plantations, even when most other trees appear to be weak or starved. The cottonwood thrives best upon rather low lands, and yet it is generally an admirable tree upon high and dry areas. The so-called Carolina poplar is only a very luxuriant cultivated form of the cottonwood. As sold by the New York nurserymen it does not differ otherwise from the wild Popuhis monilifera of our woods and creek borders. There is a golden-leaved form of the cottonwood known as var- iety Van Geertii or var. aurea. It is one of the best of yellow- leaved trees, and generally holds its color throughout the season. Like all trees of this unusual character, it should be used cautiously, and the best effects are obtained when it is planted against a group of trees so as to appear as if naturally projecting from the other foliage. 7. Populus nigra (Linn. Sp. PI. 1034 (i753). P. Hudsonica, Michx. f. Hist. Arb. Amer. iii. t. 10. P. beiulifolia, Pursh, Fl. Amer. Sept. ii. 619. P. Eugenie of nurserymen). BLACK POP- LAR, h and 1, fig. i . A European tree of medium to large size, with leaves somewhat resembling those of the cottonwood, but THK CULTIVATED POPLARS. 227 generally smaller and much less deeply toothed, shorter in propor- tion to their width and often with a tapering or rounded base. The tree usually has a pyramidal habit of growth and a dark cast to the foliage. The leaf-stalk is flattened, so that the foliage moves freely in the wind. It is a less lustrous tree than the cot- tonwood and grows more slowly. Specimens were found escaped along the Hudson by Michaux, who thought it an American species and published it early in the century as Populus Hudsonica. Pursh in 1814 published it again as the " birch-leaved poplar, " Populus betulifolia , from trees found upon Lake Ontario. Although is was found half wild in New York about a century ago, it does not seem to have increased itself in America, for it is rarely seen, even in cultivated ground. The tree known in the West as Pop- ulus betulifolia is only a robust form of the European P. nigra. The black poplar runs into many perplexing forms. The best which I know is var. elegans {Populus elegans of nurserymen, f, fig. i). It is a tree of pronounced strict or pyramidal habit, but considerably broader than the Lombardy. The foliage is small and light colored and very versatile in a breeze, with a handsome reddish tint to the leaf-stalks and young shoots. It is worth growing in every well kept place, especially if placed against a planting of heavier foliage. Popidus canescens of some American nurserymen is very like this, although it has less color and brightness. P. nigra, var. Italica (Du Roi, Harbkesche Baumz. ii. 141 (1772). Var. pyramidalis, Spach, Ann. Sci. Nat. 2nd ser. xv. 31 (1841). P. Italica, Moench, Verzeichness Weissenstein, 79 (1785). P. dilatata, Aiton, Hort. Kew. iii. 406 (1789). P.fastigiata, Desf. Hist. Arb. ii. 265 (1809). P. pyramidalis, Rozier, Diet. d'Agric. vii. 619. P. pyramidata, P. Pannonica, P. Polonica of horticul- turists). LOMBARDY or ITALIAN POPLAR. This tree is too familiar to need description. It differs from the typical black poplar (P. nigra} in its tall narrow growth, glabrous young shoots, a confirmed habit of suckering from the root and generally a more tapering base to the leaves. It is one of the characteristic trees of parts of Italy, and it is from one of the Italian provinces, Lombardy, that its common name is derived. The tree is prob- ably native in Asia, however. 228 BULLETIN 68. The L/ombardy poplar was much prized in this country a hun- dred years ago. John Kenrick established a commercial nursery of ornamental trees in Newton, Massachussetts, in 1797, and two acres were ' ' devoted to the cultivation of the L,ombary poplar, which was about the only ornamental tree for which there was any demand in those days."* It is probable that very few, if any, of the trees sold by Kenrick are still living, even in locali- ties where the climate is not severe ; and this is evidence that the tree is short lived — a fact which all careful observers must have noticed. A hardy type of the Lom- bardy is grown in the North- west. Professor Budd gives the following account of it.f ''In the summer of 1882 Mr. Gibb and the writer were surprised to find the Lombard y poplar in perfect health in central Russia, where our locust, hon- other trees killed down each winter as does the common peach in north Iowa. Our surprise came from the fact that L,oudon in- clined to the belief that Populus dilatata [one name for the L,om- bardy Poplar] was native to the valley of the Po in L,ombardy, from whence it came to England and America. But Russian bot- anists soon assured us that its home was in the east and that its hardiness varied like other species, and hence depended on the region from whence it was obtained. Under the name of Populus dilatata we imported the hardy kind from Voronesh, in central Russia. As this is 300 miles north of the sea of Azoff, from whence came the Russian Mennonites of Minnesota, I suspect *Garden and Forest, i. 302: fRural Life, Aug. 31, 1893, p. 12. 10. Lombardy Pop- lar. (% nat. size.} American black ey locust and THE CULTIVATED POPLARS. 229 that our importation is hardier than the one seen around St. Paul. We call it the Russian Lombardy. It is a much nobler tree than the variety from the Po valley, as its top is not so thin and spiry, and its foliage is thicker and darker. We have not talked about this poplar for the reason that its timber has no relative value. Yet it fills a place in landscape gardening not taken by any other tree." The various merits of the Lombardy poplar — which is the most familiar tree of the genus — have been already discussed. It has been planted too freely, but it is gradually dying out in the east, and time will no doubt eliminate its offensiveness in the landscape. There is said to be a form of the Lombardy with variegated leaves, but I hope that it will not find its way into this country. A tree which is already over-bold would be impertinent with a painted foliage. " Planted as it was a hundred, or even fifty years ago, in all possible situations, without regard to its surroundings or to the positions in which it was placed, it did more, perhaps," says Garden and Forest, ' • than any tree which has ever been planted, especially in some parts of Europe, to disfigure the landscape. There is no tree, however, which can take its place, or which can so quickly send up a tall, slender shaft to break a low or monot- onous sky line. It became an unpleasant feature in the landscape only when it was used without judgment and without discretion." GROUP II. ASPENS and WHITE POPLARS, with short non-glu- tinous often pubescent buds. 8. Populus Tremula (lyinnaeus, Sp. PI. 1034). EUROPEAN ASPEN. Figs, n, 13. — An open-headed, light-leaved tree, common throughout Europe, and occasionally cultivated in this country, especially in its weeping form. Leaves small and thin round-oval, more or less whitened beneath, especially when young, bordered with deep and rounded incurved teeth. Leaf buds small. The leaf-stalks are long and slender and flattened, giving a restless motion to the foliage. The weeping form of the European aspen is perhaps the best weeping tree amongst the poplars. The spray is light, airy, and fountain-like, quite unlike the more common weeping forms of our native Populus grandidentata, which present a stiff weeping aspect, a combination which is rarely pleasing. The lightness 230 BULLETIN 68. of the foliage of the Euro- pean aspen has been re- tti arked by writers from the earliest times. Ger- arde, in 1597, remarks that the tree ' 'may also be called Tremble, after the French name, consid- n. Populus Tremula (2/3 nat. size]. ering it is the matter whereof womens tongues were made, (as the Poets and some others report) which seldome cease wagging. ' ' A characteristic interest attaching to this tree is the profusion of very long catkins which appear in earliest spring, even before our native poplars are in bloom. They appear at Ithaca late in March or the first of April. The staminate or male catkins are particu- larly pleasing, and \ ^ >^^-XM /// planters should se- lect that sex, if pos- sible. The illustra- tion on the next page shows these inter- esting flower-clus- ters nearly full size. 9. Populus grandidentata (Michaux,Fl.Bor.- 12. Populus grandidentata. nat. size.} 232 BULLETIN 68. Am. ii . 243 ( 1 803) . P. Graca pendula , P. nigra pendula and Parasol de St. Julien of nurserymen). lyARGE-TooTHED ASPEN. Fig. 12 ; •a, b, c, d, fig. i. — This is a common native tree from Nova Scotia to North Carolina. It is distinguished from the European aspen, above, by much larger and thicker leaves which are bluish or rusty- white beneath, more ovate in outline, with larger and more spreading teeth, stouter leaf-stalks and larger leaf-buds. In its 14. Populus tremuloides (% nat. size). normal or erect form, it is rarely cultivated, but the weeping va- rieties, under a variety of names, are frequently seen. Most, and perhaps all of these varieties originated in Europe, where the tree, like the cottonwood and the common aspen, were early introduced. The habit of the tree is too stiff and the foliage most too heavy to make the best weeping subjects, however. One of the best of these weeping forms is that known as Parasol de St. Julien. The characteristic weak or zigzag winter twigs of the weeping varie- ties of this species are shown in Fig. i . A is the form sold as P. grandidentata pendula ; b is Parasol de St. Julien, and this twig shows a flower-bud midway. These two forms, it will be seen, have a stiffer or straighter habit than the two following. C is the form sold as P. Gr&ca pendula, and d the one called P. nigra pendula. THE CULTIVATED POPLARS. 233 10. Populus tremuloides (Michaux, Fl. Bor.-Am. ii. 243 (1803). P. trepida, Willd. Sp. PI. iv. 803. P. Graca and P. Atheniensis of horticulturists). COMMON ASPEN or POPPLE. Fig. 14. — This is the commonest of the American poplars, and it ranges from Labrador to Kentucky, New Mexico and California. It is the species which springs up in recent clear- ings. In aspect it is much like the European Aspen (P. Tremula}, but the leaves lack en- tirely the deep teeth of that species and they are green on the under side. The catkins are also smaller, and there are other botanical differences. There are no horticultural varieties of this species, so far as I kno w ; but the plant is worthy at- tention from plant- 75. Populus Sieboldi (% nat. size], ers, as already indicated (page 208). 11. Populus Sieboldi (Miquel, Ann. Mus. Bot. Lugd. iii. 29. P. rotundifolia of American nurserymen). Fig. 15. A Japanese species with foliage somewhat like the last only much larger and whitish below. Professor Sargent says* that "this tree is not rare in southern Yezzo, where it grows to the height of twenty or thirty feet, springing up in considerable numbers on dry, gravelly soil." The species is little known in this country. It makes a tree of spreading habit, with rather dark and heavy foliage. It appears to be hardy in western New York. *Garden and Forest, vi. 404. 234 BULLETIN 68. 12. Populus alba (Linnaeus, Sp. PI. 1034 ( 1753)- WHITE POPLAR, ABELE. A common European tree frequently planted in this country. Leaves much like those of Populus grandiden- tata, but smaller, usually thicker and more angular, the under surface — especially early in the season — woolly white. The straight, strong cylindrical winter shoots of this species and its varieties, with the very small buds, are shown at o, n, and m, in fig. i. The typical form of Populus alba is less grown here than the var- ieties with lobed and very white-bottomed (and occasionally variegated) leaves. P. alba, var. nivea (Wesmael, DC. Prodr. xvi. 2d part, 324. P. nivea, Willd. P. argentea of nurserymen). This is the commonest form of white poplar in this coun- nat. size}. . »*.••< 1,1 try. It is known by the snow-white under surfaces of its foliage and the three or five lobed maple-like leaves. It is far too frequent about old yards, where its inveterate brood of suckers make it a perpetual nuisance. It is sometimes called Silver maple, from the resemblance of its foliage to that of the maple. The tree is so obtrusive in its char- acter that it can rarely be used with good effect in home grounds. As a street tree in cities it is particularly offensive for the cottony covering of the under side of the leaves and of the shoots holds soot and dust, and it looks repulsively dirty. It is a misfortune that the tree were ever brought into the country, for few people appear to know how to make a considerate use of it. P. alba, var. canescens (Loudon, Encyc. 820). Fig. 16. Leaves broad or nearly circular in general outline, prominently notched but not lobed, the under surfaces and the young shoots Populm alba var. canescens THE CULTIVATED POPLARS. 235 very white- woolly. This tree is met with occasionally. Its hor- ticultural value is not greatly different from that of var. nivea, P. alba, var. Bol- *leana (Lauche, Woch- enschrift der Deutsche Garten, No. 32, Aug. 10, 1878. P. B o lie ana , Lauche, 1. c.). BOLLES' POPLAR. Fig. 17. A very tall and narrow- topped tree, with cottony leaves rather more deeply lobed than those of the var. nivea. The tree was introduced into Eu- rope in 1875 from Turk- estan, and it was named for Dr. C. Bolle, an arboriculturist. The tree bears about the same relation to Popu- lus alba that the L,ombardy poplar bears to Populus nigra. Its fastigiate habit combined with the white foliage and shoots, make it a most emphatic tree and there is great danger of planting it too freely. Populus alba var. Bolle- ana (% nat. size). INDEX TO SYNONYMS. Populus angulata = P. monilifera. Populus argentea = P. alba, var. nivea. Populus Atheniensis = P. tremuloides. Populus Bereolensis = P. laurifolia. Populus betulifolia = P. nigra. Populus Bolleana = P. alba, var. Bolleana. Populus Canadensis = P. monilifera. Populus canescens of some = P. alba, var. canescens. Populus canescens of some = P. nigra, var. Populus Carolina = P. monilifera. Populus Carolinensis = P. monilifera. Populus Certinensis = P. laurifolia. Populus crispa == P. balsamifera, var. vimiualis. 236 BULLETIN 68. Populus dilatata = P. nigra, var. Italica. Populus Dudleyi = P. balsamifera, var. viminalis. Populus elegans = P. nigra, var. elegans. Populus Eugenie = P. nigra. Populus fastigiata = P. nigra, var. Italica. Populus glandulosa = P. monilifera. Populus Grceca = P. tremuloides. Populus Grcsca pendula = P. grandideutata. Populus Hudsonica = P. nigra. Populus Italica = P. nigra. var. Italica. Populus laurijolia of some = P. balsamifera, var. intermedia. Populus laurifolia of some = P. balsamifera, var. viminalis. Populus Lindleyana = P. balsamifera, var. viminalis. Populus macrophylla = P. candicans. Populus nigra pendula = P. grandidentata. Populus nivea = P. alba, var. nivea. Populus Nolestii = P. balsamifera, var. latifolia. Populus Ontariensis = P. candicans. Populus Pannonica = P. nigra, var. Italica. Populus Petrovski = P. laurifolia. Populus Polonica = P. nigra, var. Italica. Populus pyramidalis = P. nigra, var. Italica. Populus pyramidalis suaveolens = P. balsamifera, var. viminalis. Populus pyramidata = P. nigra, var. Italica. Populus rotundifolia = P. Sieboldi. Populus salicifolia = P. balsamifera, var. viminalis. Populus Sibirica pyramidalis = P. balsamifera, var. intermedia. Populus trepida = P. tremuloides. Populus Van Geertii — P. monilifera. Populus viminalis = P. balsamifera, var. viminalis. Populus Wobsky = P. balsamifera, var. latifolia. COMPENDIUM. Landscape gardening is the embellishment of grounds in such manner as to secure landscape or nature-like effects. The style of planting, therefore, should be free and easy, devoid of all for- malisms and unusual or forced effects. There should be broad open spaces of greensward and heavy masses, or groups, of trees and bushes ; and the heaviest plantings should be about the bor- ders of the place. Scattered planting of individual trees and bushes is fatal to good effects. Trees which are simply odd or THE CULTIVATED POPLARS. 237 curious introduce irrelevant and jarring effects, and they should never be made emphatic or prominent features of a place. Trees of very unusual or striking character, as the lyombar cly and Bolle poplars, must, likewise, be used with the greatest caution, and, • above all, their formality" and strangeness should not be enforced by planting them in rows, in rural places. The poplars are examples of trees which should be used only for secondary or incidental effects in landscape gardening, and never to construct the body or main features of the planting. Cheap trees produce cheap effects. The L/ombardy poplar may be used to advantage now and then in a group of trees to add spirit and vigor ; but it should rarely be seen as an isolated specimen. The tree is used indiscriminately, because it grows rapidly in all situations and because its oddity pleases many people. It is so much abused that its legitimate value is obscured. The varieties of the white poplar or abele are, in general, even less desirable than the lyOmbardy. As ordinarily planted, they are immodest and ugly trees, especially the whitest varieties, and their use in farm yards, country cemeteries and all small places should be discouraged. Poplars which should be encouraged for ornamental planting are the common cottonwood, the common wild aspen, the normal or erect form of the large-toothed aspen, the Certinensis poplar, Populus elegans of the nurseries, and the European aspen. Poplars of particular value for shelter belts and timber are the Certinensis, cottonwood, balm of gilead, and possibly Populus Simonii. Species of rather heavy and dark foliage and strong growth, and which may be used for groups or masses, are the balm of gilead, Nolestii, and probably Populus Sieboldi and P. Simonii. Among the species and varieties which are interesting because of natural peculiarities and which may be used for incidental effects or as single specimens, are Populus angustifolia, various forms of the balsam poplar (especially the variety viminalis) , and forms of the European black poplar. Weeping varieties are found in several species. The best is probably the drooping form of Populus Tremula, the European 238 BULLETIN 68. aspen. There are good weeping forms of the large-toothed aspen (Populus grandidentata), but they are apt to be too stiff for the best effects fn a drooping tree. There are yellow-leaved or varie- gated forms of some species, of which the best is the variety of the cotton wood known as Van Geert's golden poplar. The best single species of poplar for general planting in New York, is probably the common cottonwood or Carolina pop- lar (Populus monilifera). The second choice is the new Russian species known as Populus Certinensis (properly P. laurifolia). L,. H. BAILEY. Bulletin 205. September, 1902. Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station, ITHACA, N. Y. BOTANICAL SHADE TREES By W. A. MURRILL. PUBLISHED BY THE UNIVERSITY ITHACA, N. Y. A48. OROANIZATION OF THE CORNELL UNIVERSITY AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION. BOARD OF CONTROL THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY. THE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE AND STATION COUNCIL. JACOB GOULD SCHURMAN, President of the University. FRANKLIN C. CORNELL, Trustee of the University. ISAAC P. ROBERTS, Director of the College and Experiment Station. EMMONS L. WILLIAMS, Treasurer of the University. LIBERTY H. BAILEY, Professor of Horticulture. JOHN H. COMSTOCK, Professor of Entomology. STATION AND UNIVERSITY EXTENSION STAFF, I. P. ROBERTS, Agriculture. G. C. CALDWELL, Chemistry. JAMES LAW, Veterinary Science. J. H. COMSTOCK, Entomology. L. H. BAILEY, Horticulture, Nature-Study. H. H. WING, Dairy Husbandry. G. F. ATKINSON, Botany. M. V. SLINGERLAND, Entomology. G. W. CAVANAUGH, Chemistry. L. A. CLINTON, Agriculture. JOHN CRAIG, Extension Teaching. J. W. SPENCER, Extension Work. J. L. STONE, Extension Work. MARY ROGERS MILLER, Nature-Study. MRS. A. B. COMSTOCK, Nature-Study. C. E. HUNN, Gardening. J. A. FOORD, Dairy Husbandry. G. W. TAILBY, Farm Foreman. O. F. HUNZIKER, Dairy Bacteriology. ALICE G. McCLOSKEY, Nature-Study. J. M. VAN HOOK, Botany. OFFICERS OF THE STATION. I. P. ROBERTS, Director. E. L. WILLIAMS, Treasurer. EDWARD A. BUTLER, Clerk and Accountant. Office of the Director, 20 Morrill Hall. The regular bulletins of the Station are sent free to persons in the State who request them. CORNELL UNIVERSITY, ITHACA, N. Y., Sept. i, 1902. THE HONORABLE COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE, ALBANY, N. Y. Sir : — I have the honor to submit for publication under Chap- ter 430 of the Laws of 1899 a bulletin on "Shade Trees in Cities' ' prepared under the direction of Professor G. F. Atkinson by Dr. W. A. Murrill, who a few years ago was Assistant Cryptogamic Botanist of this station. The work was begun by careful study of the shade trees in Ithaca during one year, and was then con- tinued by Dr. Murrill in some other cities in this country and in some of the capitals of Hurope. The matter of the bulletin is of general interest, but is of more special interest to persons living in villages and cities. The con- ditions of environment for trees, especially in cities, is so different from their natural environment, that there often result certain injuries which are difficult to determine. Mr. Murrill has discussed these matters as well as the general care of the shade trees, the selection of suitable varieties, and methods of planting, pruning and protection. There is just at present a widespread interest in the matter of village and city improvement, and I believe that this bulletin will contribute matter of interest and value to those who are seeking information concerning the uses of trees in villages and cities and the methods for their successful propagation and pro- tection. Very respectfully yours, I. P. ROBERTS. SHADE TREES. BY WILLIAM A. MURRILL, A.M., PH.D. One of the most obvious facts of the present day is the gathering of agricultural populations into towns and cities. Connected with this fact is the problem of municipal govern- ment and the amelioration of the conditions of city life. The object of this bulletin is to increase the growing interest in shade trees as material aids to the healthfulness and attractive- ness of cities and towns and to consider the principles under- lying their selection and care. It is hoped that an intelligent appreciation of the requirements of city trees will thus be awakened in this country such as exists in the older cities of Europe. In the treatment of the subject, a discussion of the value of shade trees with some account of the kinds found in various cities has received first attention. The merits of different trees in common use are next considered and lists made of those which have been found by experience to be best fitted for street plantings and those which have failed in greater or less degree to fulfill the rigid requirements demanded. Lastly, the work of planting, pruning, protecting, caring for wounds, and other operations connected with the general care of street trees are discussed at some length. The illustrations are made from photographs by the author, with the exception of those representing leaf-blight of the maple, which were photographed by Miss A. V. Luther. THE VALUE OF SHADE TREES IN CITIES. The cultivation of trees in cities is beneficial in many ways. In the first place, they add to the healthfulness of a city by cool- ing and purifying the air. Besides cutting off the direct and reflected rays of the sun, foliage exercises a marked effect on the temperature by evaporating large quantities of water from its surface, and the reduction of the temperature in this way is greatest on dry, hot days when it is most needed. Leaves also 6 BULLETIN 205. absorb impure and hurtful gases and manufacture the oxygen needed by animals for respiration. Circulation of the air, due to unequal temperature, is likewise promoted by trees properly pruned and arranged ; while the air of basements and cellars is rendered less humid by the removal of surplus water from the surrounding soil through the medium of roots and foliage. Secondly, trees add materially to the comforts of a city life. In New York, where the streets are narrow and the houses high, shade, may not ordinarily be considered a matter of prime impor- tance as regards health, but it is a matter of public comfort, and when the heat becomes intense as it has during the past two sum- mers, it may be of great importance in protecting life. Deciduous trees seem specially designed to shield our sidewalks from the glare of the sun in summer and to expose them to its warmth in winter. In many cities, especially in those of Europe, trees are used during the summer as canopies for courts and restau- rants, and the broad shaded sidewalks are often furnished with lunch tables, which are much more attractive than those indoors. Living thus in the open air not only contributes largely to com- fort, but also to health. In the third place, trees give pleasure. They soften the hard lines and add attractive forms and colors to the monotony of buildings. Their bright green foliage is eagerly watched for in the spring and the changing colors are a constant source of pleas- ure in autumn. The most attractive cities are those in which well-shaded streets and beautiful parks are most abundant. Lastly, trees add greatly to the value of property and draw men and money to a city. The cities of the future will have wide streets planted with trees as a matter of business. In such cities people will remain far into the summer, when the streets and shops of treeless cities are deserted ; and the business men will reap the profits. During the controversy last summer over the passage of tramcars across Unter den Linden, Emperor William not only objected to the trams, but expressed his intention of planting two additional rows of trees along the sidewalks on this avenue ; and, when some one hinted that the shopkeepers might object, he replied : " Oh, no. People prefer shade to sun in sum- mer, therefore more people would pass through a shady street. Consequently it would be better for the shopkeepers. " SHADE TREES. THE MERITS OF VARIOUS TREES DISCUSSED. Experiments thus far made do not give a correct idea of what trees will do in cities when properly cared for ; but certain facts have been deter- mined with regard to many species which should be considered in making up a list for use in cities. Without this discussion of the merits of each tree, a list would neither be understood nor appreciated. I therefore give below some of the points for and against the most commonly cultivated shade trees, following their order in the list, which order is substantially according to merit. OAK. So far as experiments have shown, oaks are the best shade trees for cities. They are strong, durable, and beautiful, and have few enemies. Owing to a popular notion that oaks grow slowly, they have heretofore been little planted on streets, but several cities are now beginning to make use of them. The oldest oaks are to be seen in Hamburg, where the city has encroached upon the ancient forest. An avenue of this same species (Q. pedunculatd] has been recently planted in Cologne, which, so far as I have observed, is the only city in Europe that has made use of the oak for street planting. In this country, the oldest oaks may be seen in Washington, where the red oak and pin oak in particular have been very success- fully grown. Red oaks have also been recently planted in Boston between Franklin Park and Hunt- ington Avenue. The best species of oak are, probably, the red oak, the pin oak, and the scarlet oak ; but there are several other species almost as good as these, though none of quite so rapid growth as the red oak. The white oak is somewhat objectionable on account of its slow growth and because its leaves remain upon the tree after they are dead. The number of oaks given in the list might be much increased. Those selected are of various sizes and have been given FIG. 15. — Avenue of pin oaks east of the White House, Washington. SYCAMORE. fo £ The sycamore is an excellent shade producer, the leaves appearing at the proper time in this latitude and remaining on the tree as long as could be desired, when they give place to the persistent and graceful fruit. With a little protection it passes the 8 BULLETIN 205. northern winters uninjured and develops rapidly into a splendid and shapely tree large enough for the widest avenues or capable of being adapted by pruning, to which it most readily submits, to very narrow streets. Such is the activity of its young wood and bark that the stem is at times completely girdled without appreciable injury, and the outer layers of its cortex are annually sloughed off during late summer and autumn, leaving the new layers beneath entirely free from soot and dirt accumulated during the summer. It is partly due to this, perhaps, that it enjoys with the ailan- thus the distinction of being best adapted to parts of cities where smoke and dust abound. The only serious enemy of the sycamore is a fungus which attacks its shoots and young leaves in early summer, greatly disfiguring the tree. In some cities of southern Europe complaint is made of the thick hairy cover- ing which becomes detached from the young leaves and twigs and gets into the nose and mouth producing an inflammation known as the "sycamore cough." This tree is, however, most widely and abundantly employed in the cities of India, Persia, and Europe, while in America it is deservedly growing more popular as a street tree every year. In London, it is con- sidered by many to be the only tree that will thrive in the dirt and smoke of so large a city. Of the two common species of sycamore, the eastern is smaller and of closer growth than our native species, though less hardy and less beautiful in form. It was for some time thought, also, that the eastern species was less subject to attack by the sycamore fungus, but this is probably not the case. In this country, the oriental sycamore is usually preferred, while in Paris the western species is used exclusively, since it seems to conform better to the style of pruning adopted in that city. AILANTHUS. The ailanthus is another importation from the orient, less common than the oriental sycamore, and, on account of some especially objectionable qualities, very unpopular withithe public. Some of these qualities, however, are not serious faults and may be entirely corrected with proper care. For example, the unpleasant odor at blossoming time is confined to the male flowers, and trees bearing these flowers need not be cultivated. The habit of sprouting profusely at the roots, though dangerous to pavements, ren- ders the propagation of the ailanthus extremely easy, and also make it pos- sible to select only the desirable trees. Those who object to the odor of the male flowers for two or three days, however, must endure the sight of the ugly brown fruit -clusters which often hang upon the tree throughout the winter. A fault which cannot be remedied is the early maturity and disfig- urement accompanying rapid growth. When young, the ailanthus is vig- orous and shapely, if property trained, and its large leaves are green until frost, but most of the old trees I have seen, present a very scraggly and unsightly appearance. There are fine avenues of this tree in Paris, where it SHADE TREES. 9 is unrivalled for vigor and general thriftiness. When these trees show signs of failing, they will be cut down and the avenues replanted. The qualities which make the ailanthus especially desirable as a shade tree are its ability to grow in even the most barren soil and to thrive in the midst of smoke and dust and other adverse surroundings peculiar to city streets. When the question is not what tree would be the most ornamental, but what tree would live and grow in a particular locality, then the ailan- thus should certainly be considered. NORWAY MAPLE. The Norway maple appears to be the best maple we have for street use, though most of the trees I have seen are still comparatively young. Care must be taken to prevent its heading too low and making too dense a shade, but this can be easily done by timely and skillful pruning. Like the sugar maple, it suffers from dust and smoke, though not to the same extent, while it endures other street conditions much better, as may be seen by comparing the two species in any of our cities. After the first two or three years it makes a strong and rapid growth, and develops into a shapely tree well adapted to street use and free from any serious pests. GlNKGO. The ginkgo is a new and very promising tree from Japan. There is a fine avenue of them in Washington and they seem to stand the winter as far north as Boston, where several young trees have recently been planted. At Rochester, the extremities of the lower limbs are often winter-killed, and in northern Germany it cannot be successfully cultivated on account of the severe cold and injury to its branches from snow. This tree is in many ways an ideal street-tree, and is without enemies of any kind. One must wait many years for shade, however, and the form of the tree must be adapted to street-use by careful pruning. The indications are that the ginkgo will make a valuable addition to our list of shade trees ; but experiment alone will definitely determine its value. A new tree often has many advantages in the way of soil and attention which would work wonders if bestowed to an equal degree on some ordi- nary and less esteemed species ; while it might be difficult to say just what effect the vigorous conditions under which many of our city trees exist would have upon the species newly introduced. It is to be hoped that the ginkgo will not have to suffer all that some other trees have borne. ASH. The ash is a rapid grower and practically free from insects and diseases. Its foliage does not appear so early as to exclude the sun from the soil in spring-time. The wood is strong and valuable, but the branches are badly deformed by the wind. As its roots lie near the surface, it is adapted to io BULLETIN 205. low soils. Thus far, the ash has not been very much used in cities. Of the various species of this tree, the white ash is much the best. HACKBERRY. The hackberry is another of our common native trees which deserves to be more frequently planted. It is shapely, not choice as to soil, grows rapidly, resists drought, is easily grown from the seed and easily transplanted, and is free from any serious diseases. Various leaf- eaters and gall insects attack its foliage, and its branches are often disfigured by distortions attributed to a gall-mite and a powdery mildew, but none of these troubles seriously injure its value as a shade producer nor endanger its life. It is said to be frequently used for shade in the west. SWEET-GUM. The sweet-gum develops rapidly and well in a great variety of soils and is practically free from insects and fungus attacks. The beauty of its foli- age in autumn more than offsets the extra care required in transplanting and the litter caused by its fruits. KENTUCKY COFFEE-TREE. This tree can be grown only in rich damp soil. I have seen it very rarely in cities, but the specimens I have observed were very handsome and I think it deserves a trial in soils to which it is adapted. Bui. The merits of this most popular shade tree are so well known that I need not record them here. It should not be planted however, to any great extent in the large cities of the East, unless provision is made for regular and thorough spraying and other precautions taken to hold in check its various insect enemies, among which the leopard moth and the imported leaf-beetle are the most destructive. The elm is adapted to wide streets and requires deep moist soil. Its condition in many of our cities is far from satisfactory, and its use as a street-tree is in many localities attended with considerable risk. In towns and villages where the leaf-beetle is as yet unknown, the elm is grown with great success. Other species of elm are occasionally planted in our cities, but none are equal to the American elm in general fitness for street use. The slippery elm, for example, cannot be used on account of its mucilaginous bark, which is relished by the small boy as a substitute for chewing gum ; and the English elm, which does well in Berlin and Hamburg, is so greedily attacked by the elm leaf-beetle when planted here that it is not only useless for pur- poses of shade, but forms a centre from which this insect easily spreads to neighboring trees of our own species. Incidentally, the English elm is sometimes used as a trap tree in working against the elm leaf-beetle. SILVER MAPLE. The silver maple is a graceful tree of very rapid growth and possesses many qualities of an ideal street tree ; but it is especially subject to injuri- SHADE TREES. ii ous scales, and is often killed by borers, while its branches are liable to be broken by the wind. There are twenty-five thousand trees of this species in Washington, many of which bear injuries received during wind storms. Many also have been headed back on account of their extensive growth and are now diseased and unsightly. The silver maple endures city life very well and, if it escapes its various enemies, develops into a fine though not a durable tree ; and its cultivation is always attended with risk. HORSE-CHESTNUT. In the Spring, the horse-chestnut is an object of great beauty, but in late summer or autumn, when the red spider and mildew have completed their ravages, it seems unfit for the streets of any city. It is exceedingly tena- cious of life ; few other trees have suffered so much and survived the shock. In the deep good soil of Bonn, the horse- chestnut is a large and splendid tree. In Paris, it is abundantly and suc- cessfully used for plant- ing places and borders. But on the streets of most cities it loses its foliage too early because of drought and the effects of its numerous enemies, so aw I nil FIG. 1 6. — A canopy of horse-chestnuts. Jardin des Tuileries, Paris. that it cannot be recom- mended for general street planting. HONEY LOCUST. The honey locust is a fine tree with many good points, but too thorny for city use and often killed by locust borers. The side branches also have a troublesome way of going into the windows of houses and the pods are somewhat objectionable. SUGAR MAPI.E. The sugar maple grows more slowly than the silver maple and its branches are not subject to injury from storms. It is likewise free from most insect pests, is easily transplanted, and capable of enduring our severest winters. Unfortunately, however, this beautiful tree does not thrive in cities. Its requirements as to soil and water are unusually exact- ing and its foliage is very sensitive to dust and smoke, especially during periods of drought. I have examined the sugar maple in many cities, but have not found one in which it was cultivated with uniform success. 12 BULLETIN 205. LINDEN. The linden requires an abundance of deep rich soil and suffers much from gas, from drought, and from insect attacks. It does fairly well in Wash- ington, but is little planted now because of the extra care it requires as regards soil and water. In Berlin, Frankfurt, Hamburg, and Paris, the leaves of most varieties of linden fall prematurely on account of insect and fungus attacks. In Philadelphia a few years ago all the large lindens were killed by borers. A further objection to this tree is the litter made by its blossoms and fruit. TULIP-TREE. The tulip-tree is too large except for the widest avenues and park borders, where there is a quantity of rich deep soil and abundance of room. It is likewise difficult to transplant, the branches are very brittle, and the leaves are continually dropping throughout the season. It is, however, prac- tically free from enemies. BLACK LOCUST. The black locust is a rapid grower, hardy, easily propagated and trans- planted, and does well in poor soil. It is successfully cultivated in Paris, where the top is kept small and spherical and the branches thickly clustered. Its hard and durable wood is beginning to be used in Paris for paving the streets. On the other hand, the tree is scraggly and angular in form, its branches brittle, its foliage short- lived, its pods unsightly, and its roots badly given to sprouting. The locust borer often kills the black locust, as well as the honey locust, and has been known to FIG. 17. — Black locusts near Pere Le Chaise, Paris. spread from these trees to certain species of oaks. WILLOW. The weeping willow is the only species used on streets, and its occurrence is rare. It grows rapidly and when perfect makes a fine appearance, but the wood is tender and is often attacked by fungi, while the tussock moth and other leaf-eating insects frequently destroy its foliage. The white willow is excellent for windbreaks and for planting along the banks of streams, railroads, and other embankments. Fine rows of this FIG. 18. — Old while willows along Cascadilla Creek, Ithaca, planted to preserve the banks of the stream. PI- in diameter and IOO/J--200/'- in length. The protoplasm is finely granular and contains numerous small rounded vacuoles. The branches extend to an angle usually of between 30 and 60 degrees from the main hypha and very near the point of attachment are a little curved toward the point of growth of the same. At the point of attach- ment with the parent hypha the branch is considerably smaller 55- — Sterile fungus grown on slide from seedling of Centaurea candi- dissinia. DAMPING OFF. 267 than either the diameter of the parent hypha or the main part of the branch, and the septum separating the protoplasm of the greater part of the branch from that of the parent hypha is situ- ated some distance from the latter, usually 15/1-20,* from the main thread. This portion of the branch then, the contents of which are continuous with those of the parent thread, is clavate in form. Species of Botrytis will occasionally be developed in dis- eased tissue of this kind, and sometimes develop phenomena of damping off similar to that produced by this fungus, though much more rarely, and the mycelium in its early stages cannot so far as I am able to tell be differentiated from this sterile fungus. But if a culture of the mycelium be made, in the course of a few days or in a week, if the mycelium be that of Botrytis the conidial stage or the clasping organs will be developed. But if it be that of this sterile fungus no such conidial stage will be developed. Pure cultures of the fungus have been obtained at two different times. In the summer of 1892, from young cotton plants and again in February, 1895, from young lettuce plants which were damping off. It can quite easily be obtained in pure culture by transferring some of the mycelium grown in the air of a moist chamber, to some acidulated culture media. A very good medium is made by placing cuttings of bean stems, 7 to 8 centimeters long, in a culture tube and adding to this about 8cc. of water and one drop of concentrated lactic acid. Several of these culture tubes should be prepared, and .then sterilized in steam for two hours per day for three or four days in succession. The bean stems should project 2 to 4 centimeters above the liquid, and to the ends of these the mycelium can be transferred with a flamed platinum needle. Several transfers should be made and from portions of the mycelium which have been previously examined to be certain that mucors or other fungi are not present. Out of several trans- fers, if the growth in the moist chamber has been made with caution, a few pure cultures are quite likely to result. Bacteria will be shut out by the acid in the medium, and if the culture is free from other fungi in a few days the mycelium will be visible as a silky white growth which spreads over the surface of the bean stems growing downward over them and also outward onto the surface of the glass tube. This growth continues to ad- vance for several days with quite an even advance edge to the 268 BULLETIN 94. weft. In the course of four or five days or one week, from the time that the mycelium is visible to the eye in the culture tube, there will appear first on the stems at certain points, and later on the surface of the glass tube, minute white powdery looking tufts on the mycelium. These are made up of closely and profusely branched threads, the branching sometimes presenting numerous and quite regular dichotomies, at other times quite irregular, and the terminal branches profusely lobed, the lobes standing in all directions and considerably more slender than the threads of the mycelium, and from IO/A to 2o/u, or more in length, occupying the distal portion of the branch for a distance from 20;; to 5\> the bronze birch borer and the other birch tree acros* the road shows the characteristic work (top branches dying) of the insect. FIG. 3^. — , t lie grub or borer, natural size above. FIG. 36. — a, Portion of trunk of white birch with bark removed to shoio how tlie burrows of the borer sometimes zigzag across eacJi oilier ; b, shows a burrow extending through the wnod : r, hibernating and transforming chambers in tlie wood a short distance beneath the bark. All figures reduced slightly. THE BRONZE BIRCH BORER yt and must have kept the little creature chewing nearly every moment of the four months. Oftentimes on the trunk and larger branches the burrows of several borers zigzag across each other in interminable confusion, as shown at a in Fig. 36. Yet it is a remarkable fact that even in this case where the infestation was very severe, there were no indications on the bark of the trunk of any injury beneath, or that the tree was infested by a borer ; this fact is well shown in Fig. 33, where small portions of the bark were removed and the numerous burrows of the borer revealed. The burrows mostly extend through the grow- ing wood just beneath the bark, and often the effort of the tree to repair the injury results in a woody growth over the burrow that causes corresponding ridges to appear on the bark (Fig. 30, £). Sometimes a burrow can be traced for several inches by these ridges on the bark. The next year's growth of the tree may cover an old burrow with wood, and burrows have been found thus buried under three annual rings of woody growth, showing that the tree might overcome some of the injury were it not for renewed attacks by the pest. Sometimes the burrowing of the borers weakens the limbs to such an extent that they break from their own weight. HISTORICAL NOTES Scientific name. — The first record in the literature of this Bronze Birch Borer concerned its scientific name. Like many other American insect pests, this borer was also named in Europe. One of the adults or beetles found its way into the collection of Dejean, a Frenchman, who published lists of the beetles he had. In the third edition of his Catalogue des Coleopteres (p. 63) issued in 1836, he listed this birch borer, giving it the name of Agrilus anxius. But the honor of naming the insect is now credited to Gory, another Frenchman, who first published in 1841 a description of it and courteously used Dejean's name (Hist. Nat. des Coleopteres, Monog. des Buprestides, Vol. 4, p. 226). Dejean recorded the insect from Boreal America. In 1859, the insect was first recorded in American literature by Le Conte, and was then described under two different names as Agrilus gr avis, from Lake Superior and New York, and Agrilus torpidus from Lake Superior and Illinois (Trans. Am. Phil. Soc., XI, p, 247) ; he recorded Agrilus anxius from Massachusetts. The former names fell as synonyms of Gory's earlier name of anxius when Dr. Horn monographed the genus Agrilus in 1891, (Trans. Am. Ent. Soc. XVIII, p. 277-366. Early economic records. — Dr. Lintner was the first to record anything about the habits of the insect. In 1883, he collected 62 of the beetles "which were observed alighting from their flight in the bright sunshine, and running actively in jerking motions, over the bark upon some cut poplars piled by the wayside" in the Adirondack Region of New York. He suggested that the larva was probably a borer in poplar (37th. An. Kept. N. Y. State Mus. Nat. Hist. p. 50.; the same account occurs in Lintner's fth Kept. p. 281). In 1884, Harrington took specimens of the beetles on willows in Quebec (Can. Ent. Vol. XVI, p. 101), and in 1889, Blanchard recorded it as occurring on the foliage of poplar sprouts in Massachusetts, and he took a few specimens on the summit of Mt. Washington, N. Hamp., •• whither they had flown from below " (Ent. Am. Vol. V, p. 32). The first notice of this borer attacking birch «appears to be that of Schwarz who men- tioned the insect in 1890, in connection with the work of a Scolytid beetle, Xyloterus poli- tus (Proc. Ent. Soc., Wash., Vol. II, p. 78) at Detriot, Mich., where two silver birche* were killed. The same year Cook (3rd An. Kept. Mich. Expt. Sta., p.i 19), bred the insect 72 BULLETIN 234 from galls which were quite common in Michigan on a willow (Salix discolor}. Davis describes these galls (Insect Life, IV, p. 66) as an oval swelling of the live branch in which the borer tunnels "an oval gallery downward from the gall, sometimes in the pith, but oftener indiscriminately through the wood, and makes its exit often an inch and a half below." This work in willow is so different from that of Agrilus auxins in birch, that I was inclined to doubt the identity of the two borers, but an examination of one of Cook's specimens convinced me that they are probably the same insect, and Mr. E. A. Schwarz confirms this. As the specimen was a female, it was impossible to determine it definitely. In 1896, Jack reported (Garden and Forest for 1896, p. 269), that " some of the foreign birches in the Arboretum and other localities about Boston have been killed by the attacks of boring larvae " which were doubtless this Bronze Birch Borer. About the same time the white birches in the parks of Buffalo began to die from the attacks of this pest, and during the past six years the insect has killed hundreds of these beautiful trees in Buffalo, Rochester, Hornellsville, Ithaca and doubtless other cities in New York ; and similar destructive work is reported from Detroit and Ann Arbor in Michigan, from Chicago, and from Guelph, London and Hamilton in Canada. It is still continuing its ravages in some of these cities, slowly spreading from tree to tree, as practically no well directed effort is being made to check it. A good summary of previous records of the insect and an account of its work in Buffalo was given by Chittenden in 1898 and 1900 (Bull. No 18, new series, U. S. Div. of Entomology, p. 44-51, and Bull. 22 of the same Division, p. 64-65). In apaper on " A Disease of the White Birch" read in March, 1901, before the Michigan Academy of Science (3rd Rept. of Mich. Acad. Sci. 1902, p. 46-49) John Larsen gave an excellent account of many original observations on the work and habits of this insect. Professor Lochhead well summarized the records in 1903, (28th An. Rept. Ontario Agr. Coll. & Exp. Farm for 1902, p. 22-23). THE DISTRIBUTION AND DESTRUCTIVENESS OF THE INSECT This bronze birch borer is an American insect and is widely distributed throughout the northern United States and Canada. It has been recorded from New Hampshire and Massachusetts westward through Connecticut, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Quebec and Ontario in Canada, Michigan and Illinois to Colorado. Thus far it has been reported as injurious only in Massachusetts, New York, Michigan, Illinois and Ontario in Canada. But doubtless many white birches in other States have been killed by the insect, the real cause being unknown or unrecorded. In New York state this borer now occurs in destructive numbers in St. Lawrence County, and in the following cities : Buffalo, Rochester, Ithaca, Hornellsville, and probably others. The beetles have been taken in other parts of the State, and it is liable to appear in destructive numbers wherever white birches are used as ornamental trees. In Europe two similar borers (Agrilus betuleti Ratz. and Agrilus viridis L.) are destructive to birches. The fact that the bronze birch borer often kills large trees in three or four years is sufficient evidence of its very destructive character. Within a few years many white birches in Chicago, Ann Arbor, Detroit, Buffalo, Ithaca and other cities have been killed by the insect. A tree usually succumbs within two or three years after the first top branches die. In 1895, M. F. Adams, a keen observer of ins°ct life, discovered that "1'HE BRONZE BIRCH BORER 73 the common white birches in Buffalo's parks were injuriously infested by a borer. By 1898, several trees had been killed, the cut-leaved varieties also were being attacked, and the culprit was found to be the bronze birch borer. I saw in Delaware Avenue Park in Buffalo on May n. i8gg, at least one hundred magnificent white birches, some of them veritable monarchs nearly two feet in diameter at the base, all dying from the work of this borer. In August of the same year, Mr. Adams reported that from one spot in one of Buffalo's parks he could see fourteen black and yellow birches, but twelve of them were dead, all killed by this borer. Chamberlain reported in 1900, (Scientific American, Vol, 82, p. 42), that the result of the work of this insect is that " nine-tenths of Buffalo's white birches are either dead or dying and the rest will soon follow. Several hundred have died, including about 50 in Forest Lawn Cemetery the present season. Even the dead trees were not burned, and the pests were allowed to multiply at will." I have seen over half of the white birches on the Cornell University Campus and many of those scattered about Ithaca's lawns killed by the insect within the past three or four years. And unless the vigorous, prompt, and judicious measures now being enforced on the Campus are carried out through- out the city, Ithaca's white birches will soon be dead monuments to the industry and destrucliveness of this little enemy. FOOD- PLANTS OR KINDS OF TREES ATTACKED This insect seems to confine its work almost entirely to birch trees. The only exception yet recorded is discussed on page 72 where it was found mak- ing gall-like swellings on a willow. The European white birch (Bttula alba) and its cut-leaved weeping variety (pendu/a laciniata} have suffered most from its ravages. In the outbreak in Buffalo, the former or alba was first attacked, the infestation then extending to the cut-leaved variety. But I have seen a case in Ithaca, where a cut-leaved birch was killed before a tree of the whole-leaved form only a rod or two distant showed any signs of being infested. Several trees of the American black (J3etu!a lento} and the yellow (Betula luted) birch have been killed by the insect in Buffalo, and it is also recorded as attacking the paper or canoe birch (Betula papyriferd] . However, there is no record of any kinds of birches having been killed by the insect in forests or woodlands. It seems to have confined its destruct- ive work to the more valuable individuals and groups of these beautiful trees set in parks and private lawns. The beetles have been taken on poplars cut and piled by the roadside, on poplar sprouts and trunks, and on willow, but there is no evidence that the insect was breeding in poplar. Larsen put a number of the beetles in a cage and supplied them with fresh leaves. " When only birch leaves were supplied they fed very sparingly. Some elm leaves were then put in with the birch and they fed greedily upon these. This led to further experiment and various sorts of lea?ves were used. They fed upon almost any leaf of soft texture. But their favorite food was willow, poplar and aspen leaves with preference 74 JU/LLF/riN 23.}. strongly marked in the order given. It seems from this that the beetles upon leaving the birch feed on other trees until he time for reproduction." THE LIFE AND HABITS OF THE INSECT The chain of evidence regarding the life-story of this bronze birch borer is not yet quite complete, but from the records and from my observations and investigations most of the details can be supplied. Hibernation. — All the evidence I have, shows that the insect always passes the winter as a full-grown grub or borer curled up in a long, narrow cell or chamber, which it makes in the wood not far from the bark. I have failed to find smaller borers in uncompleted burrows in autumn. One of these hiber- nating cells is shown at c in Fig. 36. Most of the borers may be found in these cells early in October; Adams reports finding some as early as July i4th. Some of them can be easily located by cutting into the tree beneath the char- acteristic rusty colored spots (Fig. 30, #). The grubs rest in the cells in a peculiar manner with the cephalic third of the body bent around lying close to the remainder. They are very sluggish when removed from the cells. Early in the spring these hibernated borers shorten up, straighten out in their cells, and thus prepare for transforming. Transformation and habits in spring. — During the latter part of April or early in May, depending upon weather conditions, the grubs transform in their hibernating cells into the adult insects or beetles (Figs. 31 and 35). A day or two before transforming the pupae turn to the dark bronzy color of the beetle. In making its hibernating and transforming chamber in the wood in early autumn, the borer also extends its burrow up to the bark, so that in the spring the newly-transformed beetles only have to squeeze their way out of the cell and eat their way through the bark. Larsen records that the emergence of the beetles is rather a laborious process, as some were found "with the for- ward parts of their bodies protruding for hours making long rests between efforts to free themselves." Several of the peculiar shaped exit holes of the beetles are shown in Fig. 37. Eleven exit holes have been counted in an area only two and a half inches in diameter. The date of emergence of the beetles in the spring is of much importance in con- nection with methods for controlling it, and it varies somewhat with climatic and other conditions. Sometimes a few of them emnge as early as May ist, but my observa- tions and breeding notes in New York, indicate that most of them do not appear i mil Fit;. 37.- A.i// hoies oj the bronze bitch borer beetles the bark. Natural size. THE BRONZE BIRCH BORER 7- from May i5th to June ist, or even later. In 1900 Adams reported that none of the beetles had emerged by June 3rd. The beetles feed on tender foliage, evi- dently preferring other trees like the willow and poplars, as Larsen has shown. Egg-laying. — I have not seen the eggs of this bronze birch borer as I could not induce the beetles to lay eggs in my cages, but Larsen was more fortunate and obtained evidence that they were laid in crevices of the bark. He states that beetles ''confined in a glass jar were found to be depositing eggs on June 8th, and for a week or more afterwards. Pieces of fresh limbs were supplied, but the insects did not deposit their eggs upon these, but moved about feeling for crevices with their long prehensile ovipositor and having found a place, such as between the glass and the lower part of the cork or under a piece of wood, from five to ten or more eggs were put in one place. Copulation had gone on for sometime before this. Great activity was exhib- ited during the copulation and egg-laying. No observations were made on the development of the eggs. " It is unfortunate that the eggs were not described. As further evidence that the eggs are laid several in a place in crevices or rough places on the bark, is the fact that the burrow I followed from end to end, as described on page 68 and shown in Fig. 32, began at a rough place where a twig had been broken off. And Larsen found that " in one place in a slight swelling on the bark were several small openings, less in diameter than a pin. From these openings burrows were traced. The burrows are at first very small and lie close under the^bark and are filled with dark granules." Adams wrote me of a similar observation made in Buffalo early in June, 1899. He " detected the beginnings of the burrows by a slight circular discoloration on the outer bark." Thus the evidence indicates that after feeding for a few days, the beetles mate and the eggs are laid early in June in rough places on the bark of the birches, first on the upper branches and later on the trunk. Work of the borer. — The beginning of the newly-hatched borer's burrow- ings in the bark in June have just been described in the preceding paragraph. And its later work as it industriously tunnels its way, zigzagging around and through the branches has been described on page 68. Beginning early in June, the borer must work almost incessantly to be able to dig such a tunnel in less than four months, or before October ist. Length of the life-cycle. — Although no one has followed this birch pest through its whole life, all the recorded evidence and all my observations indi- cate a yearly life-cycle.* I have just made a careful examination of much of the infested portion of a large white birch, and I found nothing but full-grown grubs or borers and exit holes of last year's generation. There were no indi- * Most of the species of Agrilut* both European and American, whose life-history has been fully worked out, require two years to complete a life-cycle or generation. This is true of Agrilus viridis and Agrilus sinuatus, both European species, the latter now an American pest also. But our native Agrilus bilineatus and Agrilus ruficollis seem to have a yearly life-cycle. y6 BULLETIN 234 cations of small or half -grown borers, as there would be if the insect required two seasons to develop. NATURAL ENEMIES Were it not for the ubiquitous English sparrow, doubtless the woodpeck- ers would help considerably in reducing the numbers of this bronze birch borer. The sparrows have largely driven the woodpeckers out of city parks and private grounds. During most of its life, or for about eleven months in a year, the borer is just under the bark where the birds could easily get at it. Adams observed one of the common woodpeckers, probably the hairy woodpecker, feeding quite extensively upon the grubs in Buffalo. The pest does not escape from parasitic enemies. While examining some infested branches of birch in January, 1899, I found several borers that had been killed by parasitic grubs. The parasite had spun a tough, semi- transparent cocoon inside the skin of its host. Later the adult parasite was bred and it proved to be the interesting little creature shown much enlarged in FIG. 38. — Phasgonophora sulcata. The interesting 1. 1 lie parasitic enemy of the btonze birch borer. Much enlatged. Fig. 38. It is a Chalcid fly known to science as Phasgonophora sulcata West- wood (Griffith's Animal Kingdom, Insects, Vol. II, p. 432). Note the won- derful development of the hind legs, the purpose of which is unknown. Chit- tenden also reared the same parasite from this borer and from the flat-headed apple-borer infesting a Japanese redbud tree. The parasites issued about two weeks after the beetles. Dr. Howard writes me that the parasite has been taken in Texas, California, Washington, D. C., Illinois, South Caro- lina, Canada, Florida and Oregon, thus showing a very wide distribution. Doubtless this interesting little enemy aids materially in holding this bronze birch borer in check. But in most localities it has not yet reached that point where it is numerous enough to cope with the pest to the extent that man need not employ artificial agencies to prevent the destruction of his beautiful white birches. THE BRONZE BIRCH BORER 77 REMEDIAL SUGGESTIONS This bronze birch borer is practically invulnerable against man's usual insecticides. Nearly all of its life is spent as a borer under the bark out of reach of insecticides. The fact that the beetles feed for a few days on tender leaves would suggest spraying the trees in May with a poison, but apparently they do not eat the birch foliage to any extent, preferring that of willow, pop- lar, or elm. Thus it is very doubtful if it would materially check the insect to spray the birches with a poison. On account of the possibility that the beetles might be prevented from emerging or from laying their eggs, several applications to the bark have been suggested, such as a poisoned whitewash, a mixture of hydraulic cement and skim milk, covering the trunks with a paper wrapping, and a resin-oil wash. Adams treated about forty trees in Buffalo with a resin-oil wash (5 pounds resin dissolved and i gallon raw linseed oil poured in) with no satisfactory results. As the insect infests all parts of the tree, from branches half an inch in diameter to the trunk, it would be difficult to so cover the bark as to allow no place for egg-laying, or to put on such a coating as to prevent the exit of the beetles. I doubt the practicability and effectiveness of such methods against this birch borer. Some have tried to save their trees by cutting out the top branches that were dead or dying, but in every case the trees finally succumbed. This pruning may sometimes delay the inevitable death of the tree for a year or more. / doubt if a tree can be saved after it is once infested to the extent that the top branches are dying. Better sacrifice the whole tree at once and thus prevent the spread of the pest to neighboring trees. This brings me to the only practicable and effective method of dealing with this borer. That is the heroic one of cutting down and burning the infested tree, trunk and branches, before May ist, thus destroying the whole crop or generation of borers in their hibernating quarters under the bark. As soon as the top branches are killed (as shown in the frontispiece and in Fig- 34)) do not delay a moment, but cut and burn the tree, as its death is inevitable within a year or two. But this is much more easily said than done, as any one can testify who has tried to persuade owners of private grounds or park authorities to apply the method in time. Sentiment and the forlorn hope that the tree may revive or last a few years more, often results in an infested tree remaining as a leaf- less eyesore on the landscape for a year or more after it is dead and all the beetles have been allowed to emerge and spread to other trees. It seems to be almost impossible in many cases to get individuals or city authorities to act promptly. Often after one succeeds in getting an infested tree cut down in time, it will not be burned promptly, but left where the beetles can readily emerge, so that practically nothing is accomplished in checking the pest. A determined effort is' now being made to save the remaining white 78 BULLETIN 234 birches on the University Campus. This autumn all the infested trees show- ing dying tops are being removed and promptly burned. In cities and towns where this insect is killing the white birches, there should be enacted an ordin- ance compelling the authorities to promptly cut and burn in autumn, winter, and surely before May ist, the infested trees in the parks, and if possible requiring owners of private grounds to do the same. The mere enactment of such an ordinance will not often accomplish the desire'cyresult. Public opinion must be behind such a measure to enforce it. Ithaca Buffalo, Rochester and other New York State cities are now face to face with the problem of check- ing this pest or of losing their white birches. Civic Improvement Societies could render efficient aid in such work. Briefly then , there is no known way of preventing this bronze birch borer from attacking white birches, and the only practicable and effective method yet found for checking its ravages is to promptly cut and burn the- infested trees in autumn, in winter, or before May ist. There is no possibility of saving a tree when the top branches are dead, as shown in the frontispiece and in Fig. jj>. Cut and burn such trees at once and thus prevent the spread of the insect. NOVEMBER, 1912 BULLETIN 322 CORNELL UNIVERSITY AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION OF THE COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE Department of Entomology THE LARCH CASE-BEARER BY GLENN W. HERRICK L J D LJ h J ITHACA, N. Y. PUBLISHED BY THE UNIVERSITY CORNELL UNIVERSITY AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION EXPERIMENTING STAFF LIBERTY H. BAILEY, M.S., LL.D., Director. ALBERT R. MANN, B.S.A., Secretary and Editor. JOHN H. COMSTOCK, B.S., Entomology. HENRY H. WING, M.S. in Agr., Animal Husbandry. T. LYTTLETON LYON, Ph.D., Soil Technology. HERBERT J. WEBBER, M.A., Ph.D., Plant-Breeding. JOHN L. STONE, B. Agr., Farm Practice and Farm Crops. JAMES E. RICE, B.S.A., Poultry Husbandry. GEORGE W. CAVANAUGH, B.S., Chemistry. HERBERT H. WHETZEL, A.B., M.A., Plant Pathology. ELMER O. PIPPIN, B.S.A., Soil Technology. GEORGE F. WARREN, Ph.D., Farm Management. WILLIAM A. STOCKING, JR., M.S.A., Dairy Industry. CHARLES S. WILSON, A.B.,M.S.A., Pomology. WILFORD M. WILSON, M.D., Meteorology. WALTER MULFORD, B.S.A., F.E., Forestry. HARRY H. LOVE, Ph.D., Plant-Breeding Investigations. ARTHUR W. GILBERT, Ph.D., Plant-Breeding. DONALD REDDICK, A.B., Ph.D., Plant Pathology. EDWARD G. MONTGOMERY, M.A., Farm Crops. WILLIAM A. RILEY, Ph.D., Entomology. MERRITT W. HARPER, M.S., Animal Husbandry. J. A. BIZZELL, Ph.D., Soil Technology. CLARENCE A. ROGERS, M.S.A., Poultry Husbandry. GLENN W. HERRICK, B.S.A., Economic Entomology. HOWARD W. RILEY, M.E., Farm Mechanics. CYRUS R. CROSBY, A.B., Entomological Investigations. HAROLD E. ROSS, M.S.A., Dairy Industry. ELMER S. SAVAGE, M.S.A., Ph.D., Animal Husbandry. LEWIS KNUDSON, B.S.A., Ph.D., Plant Physiology. KENNETH C. LIVERMORE, B.S.inAgr., Farm Management. ALVIN C. BEAL, Ph.D., Floriculture. MORTIER F. BARRUS, A.B., Plant Pathology. GEORGE W. TAILBY, JR., B.S.A., Superintendent of Live Stock. EDWARD S. GUTHRIE, M.S. in Agr., Dairy Industry. PAUL WORK, B.S., A.B., Olericulture. EDWARD R. MINNS, B.S A., Farm Practice and Farm Crops. JOHN BENTLEY, JR., B.S., M.F., Forestry. HARVEY L. AYRES, Superintendent of Dairy Manufacture j. EMMONS W. LELAND, B.S.A., Soil Technology. CHARLES T. GREGORY, B.S. in Agr., Plant Pathology. WALTER W. FISK, B.S. in Agr., Dairy Industry. R. D. ANTHONY, B.S., B.S. in Agr., Pomology. The regular bulletins of the Station are sent free to persons residing in New York State who request them. THE LARCH CASE-BEARER (Coleophora laricella Hbn.) Order, Lepidoptera Family, Elachistidae GLENN W. HERRI CK Many of our favorite ornamental trees are subject to the attacks of various pests, which in some cases, notably on the elms, white birches, and hickories, prove very serious. In fact, there is scarcely a shade tree that has not one or more enemies with which to contend. The larch, which is widely used as an ornamental tree and is much admired for its soft, green, feathery foliage, has struggled for years with the larch saw- fly and with the larch case-bearer. Although these two pests were first discovered in this country at about the same time, yet the case-bearer has not attracted much attention until within the last ten years. For several seasons the larches used for ornamental purposes on the campus of Cornell University have been rather seriously injured by the small larvae of this case-bearer. Opportunity has thus been offered to observe the habits, injuries, and life history of this interesting insect during the past two years. The writer was fortunate in finding an apparently satisfactory method of controlling this pest on trees used for ornamental purposes, but the method would not be practicable for trees in a forest. HISTORY OF THE LARCH CASE-BEARER, AND INJURIES CAUSED BY THE INSECT The larch case-bearer is a European insect and has been known in Europe for many years, it having been originally described in 1827 by the German worker, Hiibner. In Europe, especially in Germany, it is a serious pest to the forest larches and the Germans have given it con- siderable attention. The insect found its way to England and Scotland when the larch was introduced into Great Britain. Later it reached America. Doctor Hagen was the first person to definitely record the presence of the insect in this country. He found it on twigs sent to him from the private grounds of Henry Watson in Northampton, Mass., in 1886. It was found on specimens of the European larch (Larix europed) that had been planted along an avenue. These trees were thirty years old and had never been affected before, so far as had been noted. The pest had evi- dently not been introduced with the trees, but had come in later from NOTE. — D. E. Fink, student assistant, gave valuable aid by his observations in the field during the summer of 1910. 39 40 BULLETIN 322 some other source. J. G. Jack, writing in Garden and Forest in 1896, says that the insect had been known in the Arnold Arboretum at Cam- bridge, Mass., for many years. It is quite possible that this case-bearer reached America earlier than 1886. It has evidently spread slowly in this country. In 1905 Dr. James Fletcher recorded the insect at Ottawa, Canada, where it was working on the European larches. He says that " the num- bers of the larvae upon the trees at Ottawa in May last were not large enough to have any serious effects upon either the growth or appearance of the trees; but I regret to find this autumn that the small cases of the larvae are enormously more abundant than they were last spring." Dr. C. Gordon Hewitt writes under date of March 29, 1912, that this species infests both the native tamarack and the European larch in eastern Canada, and that during the past two years it has been exceedingly abun- dant in certain localities, especially in the provinces of New Brunswick and Nova Scotia. He says, " The most serious depredations of this insect which I have witnessed were in Nova Scotia where considerable areas of tamarack had been attacked; the destruction and shrivelling up of the foliage gave the trees a characteristic light-brown color, quite distinct at a distance from the appearance produced by the defoliations by the larch sawfly, Lygaeonematus erichsonii" Doctor Fletcher quotes an account of Rudolph Japing, Forest Assessor, Muenden, Hanover, Germany, concerning this pest, in which the latter says, " The injury to the trees from these insects can be very great, espe- cially in the spring. The growth stops and the trees become feeble and are thus susceptible to canker, which often follows the damage done by the insect. The larch case-bearer is mostly found on trees from ten to forty years old." Cecconi says that he has observed the invasion to begin generally at the topmost part of the trees and to extend gradually toward the base. Young trees and the most vigorous ones are preferred, while the old trees and those isolated are generally spared. He calls attention to the great numbers of the larvae in the larch forests of Bellino, Italy, in 1904. He says that from nearly eight hundred grams of dry branches (that is, withered) sent to him in May and taken from the breeding cage about the end of August, he obtained more than six thousand moths. The insect is also becoming a pest of considerable importance in the forests of the northeastern United States. Miss Patch observed the case- bearers over a period of two years in Maine. She found them rather widely distributed on larches in the forest, and committing serious injury. She says, " Although minute, they have been present in such enormous numbers that larch trees have often been, during the past three seasons, THE LARCH CASE-BEARER 41 eaten bare of green early in the spring. . . . Small larches in the vicinity of Bangor and Orono which have been subjected to an attack of at least three seasons died this summer from no other apparent cause than the presence of great numbers of the case-bearers which kept the needles eaten off. Many large larches infested by this insect look yellowish and unhealthy." The case-bearer has been present on larches in the vicinity of Ithaca for several years and undoubtedly has done considerable injury. The small green leaves are devoured in early spring as fast as they push out, and on many trees the green tissues are eaten out and the leaves left pale and bleached in early spring (Figs. 14 and 15). Badly infested trees show the effects of the work of this insect and fail to make their normal growth. Many of the branches are killed outright. The records of this department show that complaints of injury have been received from Franklin county, New York. The author has also found the case-bearer in abundance on larches in the Adirondacks in the vicinity of Cranberry Lake. The work of the insect was apparent on the trees, but was almost overshadowed by the much more serious injuries of the larch sawfly (Lygaeonematus erichsonii). Doctor Felt records the case-bearer in the vicinity of Albany, N. Y., where he has seen it at work for several years on ornamental larches. THE NAME The larch case-bearer belongs to that large group of moths commonly known as the Tineids. These moths are all small and have narrow wings fringed with very long, slender scales. Although small, some of them are really very beautiful, surpassing many of our larger moths in brilliancy and richness of coloring. Since this species of insect infests only the larch, and since the larva always lives in a case, it has very properly been given the name " larch case-bearer." Its scientific name, Coleophora laricella, is also very appropriate. The word " Coleophora " means bearing a sheath, and the word " laricella " refers to the larch — the ending " ella " meaning small. Hence, we have a small case-bearer living on the larch. The following is the history of its scientific names: In 1827 Hiibner, a German worker, named the insect Tinea laricella and figured the moth and the larva. Seven years later, Treitschke, another German ento- mologist, put the insect in his genus Ornix, and added the termination pennella to the specific name or gyro because he thought all species belonging to this genus should end with pennella. Four years after, Duponchel put the insect in the genus Gracillaria, and in 1839 Zeller placed it in the genus Coleophora and retained Hiibner 's specific name laricella. Under the last name it still remains. 42 BULLETIN 322 Synonymy of Coleophora laricella 1827 Tinea laricella Hbn., Samm. Europ. Schmett., V, fig. 427. 1834 Ornix argyropennella Treit., Schmetterl. Europa, X, part III, p. 221. 1838 Gracillaria laricella Du., Histoire Naturelle des Lepidopteres, etc., XI, p. 586, pi. 311, fig. 3. 1839 Coleophora laricella Zell., Isis, p. 208. 1840 Tinea laricella Ratz., Forst-Insecten, part II, p. 244 DISTRIBUTION AND FOOD PLANTS The larch case-bearer is a European insect and is rather widely dis- tributed over Europe, being especially abundant and injurious in Germany. It has been reported as injurious in Italy, France, Switzerland, and Fin- land. It very probably exists in other countries on the Continent. It is also widely distributed in Great Britain, probably having been intro- duced on the European larch, the larch not being indigenous to the British Isles. As has been stated, the case-bearer probably reached this country by being introduced on the European larch. It is now certainly widely dis- tributed in the northeastern United States — New York and New England. Doctor Felt records it as present on larches in the vicinity of Albany, N. Y., and Doctor Fletcher recorded it in the vicinity of Ottawa, Canada, in 1905. The food plants of the insect evidently consist of the European and American larches. The latter tree is known in the United States as the tamarack, or hackmatack, and sometimes, although erroneously, the juniper. It is said that the Japanese larches are not attacked by this case-bearer. Cecconi records it as attacking the Larix leptolepis in Italy. LIFE HISTORY The larch case-bearer has an interesting life history and most interesting habits. It passes a very protected life, for while young it lives in burrows within the larch leaves and later it fashions a case in which it ensconces itself and which it never leaves as a larva. Undoubtedly this case serves to protect the tiny larva from extreme weather conditions, if not from insect enemies. Hibernation By a strange instinct the larva? migrate in the autumn from the deciduous leaves of the larch upon which they have been feeding, and securely fasten themselves in their tiny cases to the branches. Here instinct tells them they will be safe from falling to the ground and will be accessible to their food supply in the early spring. THE LARCH CASE-BEARER 43 When the larvae enter hibernation in the fall they are very small and only about one fourth to one third grown. Their cases at this time are long and slender, for each case is merely a piece of a mined leaf from the larch. The cases are nearly cylindrical, for, although the leaves of the larch are flat, the body of the larva evidently fills out the hollow leaf and makes it cylindrical. The outer, or free, end of the case is usually slightly contracted and fully closed with a sheet of silk. The other end of the case is securely attached to the branch with a copious supply of silk. Some of the cases lie flat along the branch, while others project at various angles as shown in Figs. 5 and 1 2 . Very often the cases occur in FIG. 5. — Hibernating case-bearers, natural size bunches of four or five clustered in the axil of a bud. The winter cases vary considerably in length, measuring all the way from one eighth to one sixth of an inch. In the fall of 1910 the majority of the larvae did not migrate from the leaves to the branches until the latter part of October. On October 24 most of them were still actively feeding on the leaves, but a few had moved down to the branches. By October 31 the great majority had established themselves in their winter quarters. Here they remained until the fol- lowing April, nearly six months, in a perfectly quiescent condition. The case-bearers in spring As soon as the buds of the larch begin to put out in the spring, the case- bearers wake from their long winter's sleep and migrate to the buds (Fig. 1 1) . 44 BULLETIN 322 In the spring of 1910 the larvae had begun migrating to the buds by April 15, but in 1911 they were about ten days later owing to the retarded opening of the buds. Before leaving its place on the branch the larva sheds its skin. The cast skins, with the dark-colored skeletons of the head, can be found among the tangled silk on the twigs where the case- bearers were fastened during the winter. The young larva attacks a leaf in an interesting manner. It eats a tiny hole through the epidermis of the leaf and mines out the inside tissues of the leaf as far on each side of the entrance opening as it can reach. During this time it does not let go its hold of the case, but remains attached to it by its posterior prolegs and wriggles back into it when disturbed. Attacked leaves soon assume a bleached, whitened appearance (Fig. 10), and when deserted by the larva they shrivel and curl. One larva must attack a great number of the small young leaves, for in cases observed in 1910 the larva? were not abundant enough to do the damage that they did unless each case-bearer attacked and injured several leaves. As bearing on this point, a branch six inches long was selected and it was found that this branch bore 24 whorls of leaves; one whorl, at this particular stage, containing 54 small leaves and other nascent ones in the center that could not be counted. If 54 leaves be taken as the average, then the branch bore 1,296 leaves that were of a size to be attrac- tive to the larvae. On this branch were ten case-bearers. These larvae had evidently begun at the bottom of the branch, for they were now near the tip, and every leaf of any size had been injured except those in the last whorl. Moreover, the larvae had injured the outside leaves first because these were largest, and now they were going down into the middle of the buds to get at the small growing green leaves in the center. These ten larvae had probably eaten and injured over a thousand leaves. About the first thing that a case-bearer does after it reaches the fresh buds in the spring is to enlarge its old winter case. This it does by slitting the case lengthwise on the underside and then inserting a gore of silk. The buds are not far enough out at this time so that the larva can obtain leaves for enlarging its case. In the spring of 1912 the case-bearers first began migrating to the buds on April 2 1 , a warm, sunny day. They lived on the growing buds for nearly ten days before they were able to find leaves long enough to cut off and fasten to their cases over the slit already made and filled with silk. In addition to this enlargement in diameter of the case, it is also now increased in length by the addition of silk to the anterior end. The new leaf is usually cut longer than the old case, so that on the underside of the case the leaf extends the whole length (Fig. 9). At this period in the life of the larva it destroys many leaves, for it passes from one to another as has been already pointed out. Cecconi THE LARCH CASE-BEARER 45 FIG. 6. — The female moth, much enlarged FIG. 7.. — Eggs on larch leaves, enlarged FIG. 8. — Young larva in cases just formed in autumn. Enlarged 46 BULLETIN 322 FIG. 9. — Full-grown larva in case, much enlarged FIG. 10. — Work of larva on leaf FIG. 1 1 . — Over -wintering larva getting their first meal in the spring. Enlarged THE LARCH CASE-BEARER 47 FIG. 12. — Hibernating case-bearers on branches in winter. Enlarged FIG, 13. — Full-grown larva in position for pupation. Enlarged BULLETIN 322 / FIG. 14. — Badly injured branches at right and left, with normal branch between FIG. 15. — Badly injured buds at left, normal buds at right THE LARCH CASE-BEARER 49 says that when the larvae have consumed all the needles on one branchlet they lower themselves down to others by means of a silken thread. He also noted that they devoured the flowers of the larch. Apparently the larva lives in this enlarged case during the remaining time of its growth and pupates within it. The larva The larva is dark reddish brown and, when full-grown, about one fifth of an inch in length (4^ to 5 mm.). The head is black, and the thoracic shield is black but divided along the middle. The last segment of the abdomen bears a black plate on the dorsal side. The anterior pairs of prolegs are small and each one is furnished with a circle of minute hooks; while each of the posterior prolegs bears a half circle of strong hooks point- ing forward, by which the larva clings most tenaciously to its case. The end of the caudal segment of the abdomen is beset with strong chitinized setae pointing straight caudad. The favorite locations for the larvae to attach themselves when ready to pupate seem to be at the bases of the short side branches and in the center of the leaf whorls. In Fig. 13 is shown a cluster of four pupae at the base of a short side branch. The pupal stage lasts fourteen to twenty days. The pupa is small and brownish black, with no char- acteristic markings. The moth The moths were appearing by May 24 in 1911 and were abundant from that time on. The moth is small, silvery grayish brown in color, with no conspicuous markings. Both pairs of wings are narrow, especially the hind wings, and fringed with long, slender scales (Fig. 6). The wings expand about one third of an inch. The moths are active during the daytime and when at rest they alight on the stems or leaves, with the wings closely folded along the body and the antennae projecting straight forward. Within a few days the moths pair, and in a week to ten days from emergence begin laying their eggs. The egg The eggs are small, but plainly visible to the unaided eye, and in shape they resemble an inverted teacup. Each egg is conspicuously marked with twelve to fourteen ridges radiating down the sides from the apex. The eggs are conspicuous objects on the green leaves of the larch, being cinnamon-rufous in color and standing out clearly in contrast to the green. They seem to be laid indiscriminately on the upper and under sides of 50 BULLETIN 322 the leaves (Fig. 7). The great majority of the eggs, in the vicinity of Ithaca, are deposited during the first part of June. In 1910 an abundance of eggs was found in the field on June 10. The time will vary somewhat, however, in different years. The summer habits of the larva When the larva hatches from the egg it bores directly through the floor, or bottom side, of the eggshell, and thence through the epidermis of the leaf into the inside. Mr. Fink demonstrated this habit of the larva very clearly, for he found specimens in the act of entering the leaf in this manner. Mr. Fink and the writer were puzzled by not finding any openings in the leaves_ through which the larvae had entered, until they found individuals entering directly from the egg. The larva, being exceedingly small, mines very slowly at first; but after a few weeks the light-colored mine, with the dark body of the miner showing through, is seen. The light- colored eggshell clings to the leaf for many days, but if it is tipped over one may find the opening through the epidermis to the mine. The larvae live within the leaves of the larch, gradually enlarging their mines until September. The leaves as they are mined appear russet ed. As the tiny miner grows and enlarges its burrow, it packs the empty part of the mine with excrement. During 1910 the miners began to emerge from their burrows in the larch leaves and to make their winter cases during the first half of September. Sometimes these cases were made of the old leaves in which the larvae had lived all summer, but often they were made of newly mined leaves. When the larva gets ready to form its winter case it cuts off the end of the leaf in which it has lived all summer. The larva then cleans out the burrow, goes to the lower end of the mine next to the base of the leaf, and cuts off enough of the mined leaf to make its case. The mine of the larva is large enough to allow its occupant to turn around with ease and whenever occasion demands. The larva is very neat in its habits, for it backs up from time to time in its work, pro- trudes the posterior end of the body, and ejects the excrement outside. Occasionally one finds a case still bearing the eggshell of an egg laid nearly three months previously. The inside of the case is lined with a very thin, delicate layer of silk. Some of the larvae, as already noted, make cases out of new leaves. After the middle of September one often finds naked larvae wandering over the leaves of the larch. These are the ones that have left their old mines and have gone in search of new leaves to excavate for their winter cases. When a suitable leaf is found the larva mines it out and makes the case in the same way as described above. THE LARCH CASE-BEARER 51 After making their winter cases the larvae feed for three or four weeks before entering hibernation. They migrate from the leaves in normal seasons during the latter part of October. The larvae during this period of their lives may attack more than one leaf. One would infer from Ratzeburg that as soon as the larva emerges in September from its summer mine it builds its winter case and goes into hibernation without more injury. Cecconi points out that in Italy the larva feeds on the leaves before going into hibernation, and may mine quite thoroughly more than one leaf after having made its winter case. There is undoubtedly considerable injury done by the larvae at this period of their lives. The leaves of the larch are, however, so large and so abun- dant that this injury does not become conspicuous as a usual thing. Number of broods As the life history just detailed indicates, there is but one brood in a year. This is similar to the life history of the cigar case-bearer and of the pistol case-bearer on apples. NATURAL ENEMIES The larch case-bearer is subject to the attacks of a number of parasites, especially in Europe. Two or three parasites have been bred at this station, but not in large numbers. As yet, not enough material has been obtained for determination. J. C. Crawford very kindly examined the few that were obtained here, but could place them only provisionally until he had more specimens for examination. He says, " One is a species of Pteromalidae, apparently belonging to the tribe Pteromalini ;' the second is a species of the genus Pachyneuron ; the third is a Tetrastichine and prob- ably of the genus Tetrastichus." The following parasites are recorded as having been bred from this insect in Europe; Bracon guttiger Wesm., Microdus pumilus Ratz., Campo- plex nanus Gr., Anaphes(?), Entedon arcuatus Frst., Entedon laricinellae Ratz., Pteromalus laricinellae Ratz., Campoplex tumidulus Gr., and Campo- plex virginalis Gr. METHODS OF CONTROL No practicable method of control is known for this case-bearer on forest trees over large areas. It can be controlled, however, on trees used for ornamental purposes. An account is given below of experiments at this station with arsenate of lead and the lime-sulfur solution. The concen- trated lime-sulfur solution, diluted at winter strengths, proved very effec- tive in killing the case-bearers while in hibernation. 52 BULLETIN 322 Ar senate of lead From success obtained with arsenate of lead in controlling the closely allied cigar case-bearer and pistol case-bearer on apples, it has been sug- gested that the larch case-bearer could be controlled by the same method. It must be remembered, however, that the pistol case-bearer, at least, eats much larger quantities of the foliage. That is, it is not so exclusively a miner as is the larch case-bearer. Moreover, the cigar case-bearer, in its mining and making of new cases, seems to devour more actual leaf surface and thus, presumably, obtain more poison than would be the case with the larch case-bearer. In order to test this method, however, five larch trees well infested with the case-bearers were sprayed with arsenate of lead at the rate of 2^ pounds to 50 gallons of water. These trees were thoroughly sprayed on April 25. The buds were just starting to grow well and the case-bearers were just coming on them from their winter quarters. The trees were examined from time to time, but no appreciable diminu- tion in the numbers of case-bearers could be noted. On May 5 the trees, with one exception, were carefully and thoroughly sprayed again. At this time the leaves were of fair size and the case- bearers were abundant. The trees were observed throughout the season, but no difference in the amount of injury could be seen between these and many others untreated. In looking over the trees shortly after they were sprayed, the poison was found to be invariably gathered in small globules at the bases of the leaves. The leaves of the larch are small, narrow, and glossy. The poison does not seem to stick to the narrow needles and consequently does not become well distributed over the surface of the leaves. It is possible that a small quantity of soap added to the mixture would enable the poison to spread and stick better. Laboratory experiments with arsenate of lead gave very inconclusive results. In the light of experiments at this station, the writer would not feel justified in recommending the use of arsenate of lead for control of the larch case-bearer. Lime-sulfur From experience gained in controlling the bud moth on pecans and the ribbed cocoon-maker on apples by spraying the trees in the dormant season with lime-sulfur, thus killing the hibernating larvae and pupae, it seemed possible to do the same with the larch case-bearer. Accord- ingly, on April 7, 1911, before the buds had begun to swell and before the larvae had left their winter positions, a badly infested tree was sprayed THE LARCH CASE-BEARER 53 with lime-sulfur at scale strengths. The lime-sulfur was the homemade concentrated, and tested 29° Beaume. It was diluted i to 7 and the tree thoroughly coated from top to bottom. The next day there was a heavy fall of snow. The subsequent three or four days were clear and sunny. On April 2 7 an examination of the trees showed that the buds had started and that on the unsprayed trees the larvae had moved to the leaves. On the sprayed tree, however, not a larva had left its winter position. On May 5 the writer examined many larvae and found only two alive. The others were dried up and dead. In subsequent examinations the writer was unable to find that a single larva had moved from its hiber- nating position to the leaves. Lime-sulfur is evidently a simple and effective remedy for the larch case-bearer. Probably the best results will be obtained by applying the mixture to the trees just as late as possible in the spring before the buds start growing. There is evidently no injury to buds or tender wood at this time if the mixture is used at scale strengths, say i gallon to 8| gallons of water when the concentrated solution tests 33° Beauine*. The mixture should be applied thoroughly to all the branches, and the tree should be completely covered with the solution. BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE LARCH CASE-BEARER 1827. Hubner, Jakob. — Sammlung Europaischer Schmetterlinge, V, fig. 427. 1834. Treitschke, Friedrich. — Die Schmetterlinge von Europa, X, part III, p. 221. 1838. Duponchel. — Histoire Naturelle des Lepidopteres, etc., XI, p. 586, pi. 311, fig. 3. 1839. Zeller, P. C — Isis, p. 208. 1840. Ratzeburg, T. C. — For st -Insect en, part II, p. 244. 1849. Zeller, P. C. — Linnaea Entomologica, vol. 4, p. 376. 1853. Herrich-Schaeffer. — Systematische Bearbeitung der Schmetter- linge von Europa, etc., vol. 5, p. 230, fig. 667. 1856. Frey, Heinrich. — Die Tineen und Pterophoren, p. 218. 1859. Stainton, H. J. — Natural History of the Tineina, vol. IV, p. 68. 1880. Taschenburg, Dr. E. L. — Praktische Insekten-Kunde, part III, p. 289. 1882. Snellen, P. C. T. — De Vlinders van Nederland, part II, p. 806. 1886. Hagen, H. A. — Canadian Entomologist, vol. 18, p: 125. 1892. Jack, J. G. — Garden and Forest, February 24, p. 87. 1892. Riley and Howard. — Insect Life, vol. 4, p. 405. 1895. Judeich und Nitsche. — Lehrbuch der Mitteleuropaischen Forstin- sektenkunde, vol. II, p. 1041. 54 BULLETIN 322 1895. Meyrick, Edward. — A Handbook of British Lepidoptera, p. 649. 1895. Schlich, Dr. W. — Manual of Forestry, vol. IV, p. 311. 1901. Staudinger und Rebel. — Catalog der Lepidopteren des Palaearc- tischen Faunengebietes, part II, p. 190. 1902. Dyar, H. G. — List of North American Lepidoptera, p. 532. 1904. Cecconi, Dr. Giacomo. — Bullettino della Societa Entomologica Italiana, vol. 36, p. 103. 1904. Theobald, F. V. — Gardeners' Chronicle, third series, no. 924, pp. 181-182. 1905. Fletcher, Dr. J. — 36th Ann. Rept. Ent. Soc. Ont., p. 90. 1905. Fletcher, Dr. J. — Rept. Ent. and Bot., Canada Dept. Agr., p. 191. 1906. Patch, E. M. — Bui. 134, Maine Exp. Sta., p. 218. 1906. Turner, H. J. — Notes on Coleophora solitariella, C. pyrrhulipennella, C. laricella, etc. The Entomologist's Record, vol. 18, p. 118. 1908. Gillanders, A. T. — Forest Entomology, p. 281. 1909. Smith, J. B. — The Insects of New Jersey, p. 564. 1910. Tragardh, Ivar. — Larktradsmalen (Coleophora laricella Hbn.). Entomologisk Tidskrift, p. 258. 1911. Herrick, G. W.— Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer., vol. IV, p. 68. CORNELL UNIVERSITY AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION THE FOLLOWING BULLETINS AND CIRCULARS ARE AVAILABLE FOR DISTRIBUTION TO THOSE RESIDENTS OF NEW YORK STATE WHO MAY DESIRE THEM 219 Diseases of ginseng 262 Apple orchard survey of Niagara county 265 On certain seed-infesting chalcis-flies 266 The black rot of the grape and its control 272 Fire blight of pears, apples, quinces, etc. 273 The effect of fertilizers applied to timothy on the corn crop following it 282 Seven methods of feeding young chickens 283 The control of insect pests and plant diseases 285 The cause of "apoplexy" in winter-fed lambs 286 The snow-white linden moth 289 Lime-sulfur as a summer spray 291 The apple red bugs 292 Cauliflower and brussels sprouts on Long Island 293 The black rot disease of grapes 295 An agricultural survey of Tompkins county 297 Studies of variation in plants 298 The packing of apples in boxes "301 Sweet pea studies — I 302 Notes from the agricultural survey in Tompkins county 303 The cell content of milk 305 The cause of "apoplexy" in winter-fed lambs 307 An apple orchard survey of Ontario county 309 The produ ction of ' ' hothouse ' ' 1 ambs 310 Soy beans as a supplementary silage crop 3 1 1 The fruit-tree leaf-roller 312 Germination of seed as affected by sulfuric acid treatment 313 The production of new and improved vari- eties of timothy 314 Cooperative tests of corn varieties 316 Frosts in New York 317 Further experiments on the economic value of root crops for New York 318 Constitutional vigor in poultry 320 Sweet pea studies— III. Culture of the sweet pea 321 Computing rations for farm animals i Testing the germination of seed corn 3 Some essentials in cheese-making 4 Soil drainage and fertility 7 The relation of lime to soil improvement 8 The elm leaf -beetle 9 Orange hawkweed or paint brush ii Helps for the dairy butter-maker The chemical analysis of soil (Departmental Animal Husbandry circular) The formation of cow testing associations Propagation of starter for butter making and cheese making Working plans of Cornell poultry houses Address MAILING ROOM COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE ITHACA, N. f NOVEMBER, 1910 BULLETIN 286 CORNELL UNIVERSITY AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION OF THE COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE Department of Entomology (Extension Work) THE SNOW-WHITE LINDEN MOTH BY GLENN W. HERRICK ITHACA, N. Y. PUBLISHED BY THE UNIVERSITY ORGANIZATION OF THE CORNELL UNIVERSITY AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION. BOARD OF CONTROL THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY THE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE AND STATION COUNCIL JACOB GOULD SCHURMAN, President of the University. ROBERT H. TREMAN, Trustee of the University. LIBERTY H. BAILEY, Director of the College and Experiment Station. EMMONS L. WILLIAMS, Treasurer of the University. JOHN H. COMSTOCK, Professor of Entomology. HENRY H. WING, Professor of Animal Husbandry. EXPERIMENTING STAFF LIBERTY H. BAILEY, Director. ALBERT R. MANN, Secretary. JOHN HENRY COMSTOCK, Entomology. HENRY H. WING, Animal Husbandry. JOHN CRAIG, Horticulture. T. LYTTLETON LYON, Soil Technology. HERBERT J. WEBBER, Plant-Breeding. BENJAMIN M. DUGGAR, Plant Physiology. JOHN L. STONE, Farm Practice. JAMES E. RICE, Poultry Husbandry. GEORGE W. CAVANAUGH, Chemistry. ELMER O. PIPPIN. Soil Technology. WILLIAM A. STOCKING, Jr., Dairy Industry. HERBERT H. WHETZEL, Plant Pathology. G. F. WARREN, Farm Management. CHARLES S. WILSON, Pomology. GLENN W. HERRICK, Entomology. LOWELL B. JUDSON, Horticulture. HOWARD W. RILEY, Farm Mechanics. MERRITT W. HARPER, Animal Husbandry. JAMES A. BIZZELL, Soil Technology. CYRUS R. CROSBY, Entomology. CLARENCE A. ROGERS, Poultry Husbandry. PAUL J. WHITE, Tarm Crops. DONALD REDDICK, Plant Pathology. HAROLD E. ROSS, Dairy Industry. HARRY H. LOVE, Plant- Breeding. ARTHUR W. GILBERT, Plant-Breeding. ELMER S. SAVAGE, Animal Husbandry. E. S. GUTHRIE, Buttermaking. EDWARD R. MINNS, Farm Practice. PAUL WORK, Horticulture. LEWIS KNUDSON, Plant Physiology. K. C. LIVERMORE, Farm Management. The regular bulletins of the Station are sent free to persons residing in New- York State who request them. THE SNOW-WHITE LINDEN MOTH Ennomos subsignarius Hiibn. Order, Lepidoptera; superfamily, Geometrina A half century ago the snow-white linden moth was a conspicuous insect in some of our Eastern cities and its caterpillars were very abun- dant and exceedingly injurious to shade-trees. From 1857 to 1870 the shade-trees of Brooklyn, N. Y., and Philadelphia, Pa., were annually subjected to defoliation by this insect. To check its increase, the Eng- lish sparrow was introduced from Europe, and so well did this bird do its work that for nearly a half century we have heard almost nothing about this insect as a shade-tree pest. During this time there has been an occasional reference to it as a forest-tree despoiler, but it was not until 1907 that it again appeared as a serious pest, in New York State at least. During that year it seriously injured forests in the Catskills and the Adirondacks. In 1908 and 1909 it was again very abundant and seriously injurious, and now in 1910 it promises to be as prevalent as ever. During the last two years, in rearing large numbers of the moths the writer has been able to find but one single specimen of a parasite. It may be that the absence of parasites is the main reason for the great abundance of this insect. At any rate, we must conclude that the environments, climatic conditions, and other factors have been especially favorable for this insect during the past four or five years. Just how long it will continue in its present abundance, how widely it will spread, and whether it will eventually become a pest .to our fruit- trees and ornamental plants, are questions the answers to which we shall await with much interest and considerable anxiety. THE NAME This insect has masqueraded under several names during its career with the scientists. It was first named in 1806 by Hiibner, who called it Eudalimia subsignaria. About a half century afterward, T. W. Harris, in a paper in Hovey's Magazine of Horticulture, says, "This species not having been scientifically described or named before may be called Geometra niveoser ice aria, the snow-white silky Geometer." In 1857, Guenee placed it in the genus Ennomos. Four years later, Mr. J. B. Jones, in a communication to the Entomological Society of Philadelphia, referred to it as Geometra niveosericearia, and also gave it 52 BULLETIN 286 the common name of "measure-worm," although it had no more claim to this particular appellation than many other caterpillars of the same family. Packard, in a discussion of the insect in 1869, gave it Guenee's old name again, Ennomos subsignaria, but in a subsequent and more extended discussion in 1876 changed it to an entirely new genus, Eugenia subsignaria. Finally, in 1891, Dr. J. B. Smith, in his "List of Lepi- doptera of Boreal America," listed it under the name, Ennomos sub- signarius, and under this it has since remained. Dr. Lintner, in 1882, first proposed the common name of snow-white linden moth because of its snow-white color and its chief depredations, as he then supposed, on the linden tree. It was soon found however, that it attacked other trees quite as seriously and extensively as the linden, but since the name was as appropriate as any, it has clung to the insect to the present day. HISTORY OF THE SNOW-WHITE LINDEN MOTH Early history. — The snow-white linden moth was first described in 1806 and has been known to science ever since; but it was not until about 1860 that it began to attract attention in this country as a serious pest. In 1855, T. W. Harris discusses the abundance of the larvae in the city of Brooklyn and says that a correspondent writes that the "worms" were first seen in the city "ten years ago," since which time they have appeared at the regular season every year. In 1861, Dr. J. B. Jones wrote a report on the measure worms which infest the trees of Brooklyn, with suggestions for treatment. In the same year, the citizens of Brooklyn became so excited over the increase of this measur- ing worm that the Common Council seriously discussed a resolution compelling the destruction of all linden trees on the streets of the city. In a subsequent examination, however, the caterpillars were found on so many other varieties of shade-trees that it was seen that no per- manent good could be accomplished by the destruction of the linden trees and the resolution was 'laid on the table indefinitely. In 1881, Mr. Grote wrote that, when he lived in Brooklyn in 1857, this measuring worm was so abundant "that the horse-chestnuts, elms, and maples, the latter especially, became completely defoliated, and the brown measuring worms used to hang down and cover the sidewalks ultimately to the great discomfort of the passers by." It is said that this condition continued until the introduction of the English sparrow, which is con- sidered to have destroyed the caterpillars and held the pest in check. In. 1880 the pest was discovered in Georgia. Professor Comstock reported the caterpillars as destroying forests of hickory and chestnut THE SNOW-WHITE LINDEN MOTH 53 and doing much damage to fruit-trees. Since that time we have heard mention of the insect only now and then until within the last three years. Later history. — On July 6th, 1909, we received from a correspondent at Cooks Falls, N. Y., the following letter concerning this pest: "Last year there appeared in this community a worm somewhat similar to the common apple tree worm and known locally as the 'beech' worm from its habit of eating the leaves of the beech tree. We thought it would die out over winter, but have been disappointed in this hope. It is again eating the foliage of the same trees it stripped last year and is threatening large tracts of very valuable timber land. While it appears to prefer the beech leaves it quite often attacks maple, birch, etc. As our interests in timber land are considerable, we write to enlist your aid in determining what species of worm this is, and how its ravages can be stopped." In response to this appeal, the writer made a per- sonal inspection of the infested area and found a fine forest of beech, maple, and other wood, over five hundred acres in extent, literally stripped of leaves by the larvae of this moth. The owner said that they were so numerous that the dropping of the excrement sounded like rain pattering on the leaves. The undergrowth was almost as bare as it would be in winter. The young beeches had suffered more severely than any other trees and most of them were entirely bare of leaves. Hundreds of empty pupal cases, partly rolledr-up in eaten leaves, were hanging to the trees. The caterpillars had covered a certain area on the top of this particular mountain and part way down one side. The line limiting their injuries was clear and evident to the eye long before we reached the actual area. For two successive years this forest had been denuded and the larvae were just as abundant this year (1910) as ever. On July 9, 1909, a correspondent at Arena, N. Y., about twenty miles from Cooks Falls, wrote that the caterpillars "are working mostly on beech, ash, birch, and maple. In fact, nothing comes amiss to them. In driving through the town of Hardenburgh, Ulster Co., I noticed the trees were literally stripped of their foliage and a fence running in the woods was so loaded with them (caterpillars) you could not see the rails. They hang by webs on the trees, and looking through the forest appears like looking through smoke or a fog." This same cor- respondent wrote on May i6th, 1910, nearly a year later, that the trees were again "literally covered with the very small caterpillars and that if nothing can be done to check them the Catskills are doomed." The . pest is evidently widely distributed, for there are reports of its injuries in Ulster Co., Sullivan Co., and also in the forests of the Adirondacks. 54 BULLETIN 286 In his report for 1908, Dr. Felt says that the Forester, E. S. Woodruff, reports the beeches on a tract of over two square miles as completely defoliated. The caterpillars seem to attack the beeches first, but finally spread to the birches and maples. (Fig. 54). One of the most remarkable phases of this pest were the flights of great swarms of the snow-white moths in cities and towns throughout the eastern part of the State and in New Jersey. In New York City the effect was compared to a snowstorm in mid-summer. Myriads of the moths fluttered about the electric lights. Dr. John B. Smith FIG. 54. — Caterpillars of the snow-white linden moth on maple says that on the evening of July ryth, Newark, Elizabeth, and Pater- son, N. J., had the same experience. On the morning after the flight, however, nothing remained except great numbers of snow-white wings without bodies, showing the work of the English sparrow, and probably of other birds and destroyers. These flights are remarkable since the presence of the caterpillars had not previously been noticed in these towns and cities. It seems probable that the moths must have flown long distances from the feeding places of the caterpillars in the forests. During the latter part of July, 1909, Ithaca and several other cities THE SNOW-WHITE LINDEN MOTH 55 in the central part of the State experienced similar flights of myriads of the spruce bud moths. These moths could not have bred in such numbers on ornamental spruces in the near vicinity of the towns invaded but must have come from some forested areas, perhaps at long distances from the towns invaded. Thus we have an undoubted second instance of a moth which has certainly flown long distances from the feeding places of its larvae. THE DANGER AS A FRUIT PEST The first reference to this insect as a fruit pest that the writer finds is by Thomas in his Second Illinois Report, in which he says that he twice found the larvae on apple trees, though not in large numbers, and had reared them to the perfect insect on the leaves of this tree. In 1880, Comstock, quoting a correspondent, says that the larvae were damaging fruit-trees in Georgia. In 1882, Dodge, in the Canadian Entomologist, quoting from the same correspondent in Georgia, writes that the "apple trees in June last were as destitute of leaves as in mid- winter, the fruit growing to the size of marbles and falling off." In 1904, Garman writes of this insect as an important pest of the apple tree in Muhlenberg Co., Kentucky. It was especially injurious in 1903 but not so serious in 1904, due probably to the work of parasites. Again, in 1908, Garman treats of this pest as a serious one on apple trees and says that this species "is sometimes very common locally and may defoliate whole orchards at times." In his 23rd Report, Felt says very significantly, "It would not be surprising if a number of outbreaks, hitherto attributed to our more common canker worms, were in reality the work of this species/' It is quite evident that we have in this insect a possible future fruit- tree pest of considerable importance. It apparently used to be con- fined to the shade-trees of our cities but it has now almost entirely deserted these for our forest-trees. It would not be at all surprising in view of the history of this insect if the future should see it migrating from the forest-trees to our fruit-trees and becoming a serious pest. DISTRIBUTION Evidently this insect is widely distributed over the Middle and East- ern United States, and it occurs in Canada. It has been recorded from Nova Scotia to Georgia and westward through Michigan, Kentucky, Iowa and Colorado. In New York State, the moths have been reported from Delaware, Ulster, Sullivan, Rensselaer, Albany, Columbia, Sara- toga, Schenectady, Herkimer, Fulton and Oneida Counties, and from the northeastern part of the State in the Adirondacks. 56 BULLETIN 286 FOOD PLANTS The larvae infest a great variety of forest-trees, apparently some- what preferring beech and maple. They have been found on elm, linden, chestnut, hickory, ash, apple, birch, and others. V THE LIFE HISTORY AND HABITS OF THE INSECT This insect requires nearly a year to pass through its life history. It is said that in Georgia the eggs were laid on the leaves as though there might be a second brood or generation in a season. It would seem from a study of the insect in New York that this must have been due to the carelessness of the female moths and can hardly be taken as an evidence of a second brood. At any rate, there is only one brood in New York State each year; and this is fortunate. If this pest could pass through its life history and produce a generation every two or three months, our forests would surely be doomed to destruction. The eggs of the female moth are laid on the under sides of the branches — as often on the upper branches of the smaller trees, at least, as on the lower. In a rather hasty search, the writer found the eggs laid on the beech only. However, a correspondent at Arena, N. Y., has sent many eggs deposited on maple. The eggs are always deposited at an oblique angle to the surface of the bark and lean against each other like a pile of leaning bricks. They are laid in masses of 20 to 100 or even more, and are stuck so securely to the branch that in 1909 the writer found still adhering to the trees the empty shells of quite as many old egg masses of 1908 as there were new ones of 1909. The eggs are deposited on the branches in the latter part of June and first part of July, and remain unaffected by snow, rain, or extremes of temperature until the following April and May, nearly a year after deposition. The eggs are about one twenty- fifth of an inch in length, barrel shaped, often more or less flattened on the sides, light olive when first deposited but later becoming darker in color, with a conspicuous ring at the free extremity. They occur in irregular masses, long and narrow if the branch is small but spread out if the surface is large (Fig. 55). Eggs brought from Cooks Falls in August, 1909, were placed out- doors under natural conditions and began to hatch May 2nd, 1910. Eggs sent from Cooks Falls on May nth, 1910, had not hatched, and the writer found that the caterpillars on the mountain at Cooks Falls had appeared two to three weeks later than at Ithaca or at Arena, N. Y., the difference probably being due to the higher altitude and lower temperature. Eggs at Arena, N. Y., brought into the house in THE SNOW-WHITE LINDEN MOTH 57 FIG. 55. — The snow-white linden moth: i, egg mass, side view; 2, eggs "-enlarged; 3, eggs much enlarged; 4, larva enlarged; 5, pupa enlarged 58 BULLETIN 286 February, moistened and placed by the stove, hatched and the cater- pillars, which were fed on leaves of Abutilon, apparently throve finely but were not reared to maturity. Other eggs from Arena placed out- doors under natural conditions hatched at Ithaca as early as April 23rd. The number of eggs that may be deposited on a single tree is very great. The number in six average clusters ran as follows: 93, 21, 44, 40, 89, and 67, respectively. Many clusters contain more eggs than the highest of the foregoing. Scores of such egg clusters exist on many of the trees in the infested area. Messrs. Graef and Weibe say that they removed at least 60,000 eggs from one small maple tree in Brooklyn. It is probably right to say that the eggs of this moth begin to hatch in the latter half of April, and in high altitudes probably not much before the middle of May. When a caterpillar first emerges from the egg it is only about one-tenth of an inch in length and its general color is green. The head, last abdominal segment, and sides of the body are light green while the back is a darker green. In general, when the larva is viewed from above, the two ends of the body appear light green in color with the part between a darker olive green. The young larvae begin at once to eat the green tender leaves. On May 3d, the writer placed six caterpillars, just out of the egg, on fresh tender maple leaves, each caterpillar on a leaf by itself, to watch its habits of eating. By the morning of May 5th each one had eaten holes through its leaf, varying from pinholes up to good sized shot holes. In one leaf eighteen such holes had been eaten, which shows something of the voracity of the tiny larvae. Observers who have had the opportunity to watch these larvae in the forest say that at first they climb to the top of the tree and to the ends of the branches where the leaves are presumably younger and more tender. As they grow they gradually ravage the entire tree. The caterpillars vary considerably in color and markings. In general, after the first molt they become dark reddish brown, in many cases almost black, with the head and last abdominal segment red or reddish brown and quite conspicuous. The larvae resemble the twigs of the tree on which they are feeding, and like other "measuring worms" have the habit of holding themselves erect and motionless like a broken twig. The six larvae reared on separate maple leaves and receiving an abundance of food were without exception of a beautiful pale rose color with three distinct tubercles on the abdomen, as shown in Figs. 54, 55. Many of the caterpillars received from the infested forest trees were of a light green color throughout and in marked contrast with the darker ones. Full grown caterpillars that have had all the food THE SNOW-WHITE LINDEN MOTH 59 they want become a little over two inches in length, but when they are crowded and the food supply limited they are often less than two inches long. During 'their growth the larvae molt five times or even six times. Graef and Weibe record only three molts. The caterpillars of this moth have the three pairs of true legs attached to the thorax, but only the last two pairs of abdominal legs are present, thus leaving the middle of the body unsupported. Hence, instead of walking like many other caterpillars do, they move with a looping gait and have been called "looping" caterpillars or "measuring worms." Moreover, they have the habit of spinning a silken thread and letting themselves down by it from the branches when the tree is suddenly struck or jarred. Frequently they drop half way down to the ground and remain quietly suspended in the air for a few moments, after which they ascend to the branches above. It is said that during their great abundance on the shade-trees in Brooklyn in the sixties much annoy- ance was caused by this habit of dangling in the faces of pedestrians. The following remarks of a committee from the Brooklyn Horticultural Society anent this phase of the insect are interesting: " It would seem to be entirely unnecessary for the committee to urge upon those who have been constrained to traverse our streets in the latter part of June and the early part of July, the great importance — they might almost say the necessity — of devising and accomplishing some plan for remov- ing the worms which dangle before their faces, are dropped upon their clothing, or are crushed by their feet at every step. Certainly no gen- tleman, no lady, can need to be convinced that carrying these worms from house to house, brushing them out of the face and hair, or stopping at the corners to pick them off with the fingers — at the risk of crushing them in the experiment — is not a part of the privilege which one looks for in becoming a resident of a city like this." Six caterpillars that emerged from eggs May 3rd began spinning their cocoons May 30, July i, 2, 3, 6 and 7, respectively, and changed to pupae about three days after commencing the cocoons. It should be understood that these larvae were under exceptionally favorable surroundings so far as food was concerned. The cocoons are very flimsy affairs and usually are made by turning over the edge of a ragged leaf and lining the inside with a thin net-like layer of silk (Fig. 56). Graef and Weibe say that the insects pupate on the trunks and branches of trees, on fences, railings, lamp-posts, or almost anything they can reach. The pupa is about five-eighths of an inch long, sometimes more, some- times less. It is blunt and rounded at the anterior end but strongly pointed at the posterior extremity and terminates with about six small, 6o BULLETIN 286 -3 FIG. 56. — The snow-white linden moth: 2, moths from nature; 3, lace-like cocoon 4, pupa under the rolled edge of a leaf THE SNOW-WHITE LINDEN MOTH 61 chitinous hooks that securely fasten the pupa to the network of threads lining the cocoon. The pupa is of a pale brown color necked with numer- ous black dots which in some places run together. .The six pupae, under observation, occupied 13 to 16 days for their transformations to adults. The moths are pure white, and the females are somewhat larger than the males and have thread-like antennae, while the males possess feather-like antennae. The front wings of the male and the female are angulated, those of the female more prominently. Packard says that the hind wings of the male are entire. In a long series of bred specimens, many males show notched hind wings while some are entire in outline. The hind wings of the female are noticeably and quite regularly notched. (Fig. 57). FIG. 57. — Male moth at left, female at right From the eggs brought to Ithaca from Arena and Cooks Falls we find the moths appearing from June 16 to July ist. From caterpillars obtained from Cooks Falls in 1909 we find the moths appearing July 18 to July 2$th. At Arena, N. Y., in 1909, the larvae were found pupating about July ist and the moths appeared about the middle of July. It would seem, then, that the adult moths appear from the middle of June to the last of July, depending upon the season, altitude, and other factors. The eggs are deposited within a few days after the moths emerge, thus completing the life cycle. NATURAL ENEMIES What the natural checks of this insect are we are unable to say at present. It is evident that some unfavorable conditions have operated 62 BULLETIN 286 to hold it in check for the last fifty years, and it is equally evident that for the past three or four years these forces have been partly or wholly inoperative. The testimony regarding the activity of the English sparrow in exterminating this pest in cities seems to show rather conclusively that this much-disliked bird did actually bring about the destruction of this insect. Nearly every writer on the snow-white linden moth makes acknowledgment to the sparrow and declares that the cities owe their freedom from this insect to that bird. We take pleasure in again calling attention to this little-known meritorious work of the English sparrow. Mr. William H. Broadwell in describing the visitation of the snow- white linden moths at Newark, N. J., on the night of July lyth, 1908, as "a July blizzard," has the follow- ing to say regarding the work of the * sparrows in destroying this insect: "Early the following morning, under the lamps, the wings were on the ground as thick as apple blossoms after a storm, showing that the spar- rows had not forgotten why they were FIG. 58.— A parasite (Pimplacon- brought over to this COUntry some quisitor} of the sncw-white linden ,. » n/r r> • ^ forty years ago. Mr. Grote, in a paper from which we have already quoted, after discussing the great abundance of the measure worms in Brooklyn, says further, "The advent of the English sparrow changed all this. The naked brown larvae of subsignaria disappeared before them." In 1880, Mr. G. H. French of Carbondale, 111., bred five males and seven females of a minute Hymenopterous parasite, Macrocentus irides- cens, from two caterpillars, which he took to be Ennomos subsignaria, found on an elm tree. We have not been fortunate enough to find this parasite present in any of the caterpillars reared by us. We have, however, bred one single specimen of a common parasite, Pimpla con- quisitor (Fig. 58), from the pupae of the snow-white linden moth. Since only the one specimen has been obtained from the scores of pupae we have had, it will be seen that this parasite is not abundant enough 'yet to be of any great service as a check. Mr. Harris says that Chalcis ovata, a small parasite, has also been reared from the pupae. It may well be that the great and wanton destruction of birds is one cause of the abnormal abundance of this insect. If one bird is so efficient in the control of this pest, as the evidence shows it to have. THE SNOW-WHITE LINDEN MOTH 63 been, then why may we not legitimately expect a great deal of our native birds in this respect ? Undoubtedly one of the most efficient and feasible means for the control of this insect in our forests will be the better protection of our native birds. METHODS OF CONTROL In the control of this pest in shade-trees, spraying with arsenate of lead, 3 pounds to 50 gallons of water, would probably be very effective. If it ever becomes injurious to apple trees in this State, the same method of control would have to be followed. The trees should be sprayed early while the caterpillars are small, as the poison will be much more effective then. As we have already noted, the caterpillars have the habit of sud- denly dropping to the ground in great numbers when the trees are jarred. On small trees, hundreds of the caterpillars may be jarred on to sheets and then destroyed. Unfortunately, the young larvae are not so sus- ceptible to this kind of treatment, and if one waits until they become large much of the damage will already have been done. Tho masses of eggs are very conspicuous objects and could easily be found on the branches and scraped off. In the case of small trees much good could be accomplished in this manner. On large trees it would be more difficult to collect the eggs. In forests there seems no practicable way of controlling this pest. In case of the particular forest area mentioned at Cooks Falls, the wood is being grown for the manufacture of certain wood chemicals. In this instance it may be best to cut off the present growth of timber and use it for the distillation products before it dies as a result of the annual defoliation to which it has been subject for the past two years. BIBLIOGRAPHY 1806. Hiibner, J. — Samml. Exot. Schmett., ii. Taf. 429. (Lists Eudalimia subsignaria.) 1855. Harris, T. W. — Mag. of Hort. (Hovey). Vol. 21, pp. 418-423. 1857. Guenee. — Lepidopteres nocturnes. Vol. IX, p. 181. (Description of moth and larva.) 1860. Morris, J. G.— Cat. of the Descr. Lep. of N. A., J>. 56. 1860. Walker, F. — List of the Lepidopterous Insects in the British Museum, Vol. 20, p. 209. 1861. Jones, J. B. — Proc. Ent. Soc. Phil., i, p. 31. (Report on the measure worm.) 1861. Glover, Townend. — U. S. Dept. Agri. Rpt., p. 554. (Mentioned.) 1862. Graef and Weibe. — Rpt. Brooklyn Hort. Soc., 1862. (Report on the measure worm.) 1868. Packard, A. S.— Amer. Nat. II, p. 333. 1869. Guide to the Study of Insects, p. 321. 1872. Lintner, J. A. — Ent. Contrib., i, p. 77' (Listed.) 1874. Leconte, J. L. Pop. Sc. Month., 1874, p. 381. 64 BULLETIN 286 1874. — Proc. A. A. A. S., Pt. 2, pp, 23-44. 1876. Packard, A. S. — Monograph of the Geometric! Moths of the United States. Geol. Surv. of the Terr., Vol. X, p. 528. 1877. French, G. H. —Trans. Dpt. Agri. 111., XV., p. 243. 1878. — Nox. and Ben. Ins. 111., 7th Rpt., p. 243. (Larva des- cribed and adult as Eugenia.) 1880. — Can. Ent., Vol. 12, p. 43. (Parasite bred from Ennomos — Macrocentus iridescens.) 1881. Packard, A. S. — Bull. U. S. Ent. Comm., VII, p. 62. (Brief description.) 1881. Comstock, J. H. — U. S. Dpt. Agr. Rpt., 1880, p. 271. (Injuries as Eugonia.) 1882. Dodge, C. R. — Can. Ent. Vol. XIV, p. 30. (A new apple pest.) 1882. Grote.— Bull. Geol. Surv. Terr., Hayden, VI, p. 588. 1882. Dodge, C. R. — Ent. Soc. Ont. Rpt., i3th, p. 18. (Same as above.) 1882. Packard, A. S. — Fifth Rpt. Ent. Comm., pp. 232, 306, 329, 354 and 481. 1882. Lintner, J. A. — N. Y. State Ent. ist Rpt., p. 329. (Proposes name of snow-white linden moth.) 1883. Saunders, W. — Insects Injurious to Fruits, p. in. (Brief account.) 1883. Grote, A. R. — Can. Ent. Vol. XV, p. 235. (Sparrows eating caterpillars.) 1885. Lintner, J. A. — N. Y. State Ent. 2nd Rpt., p. 76. (List of food plants.) 1886. Walsh, B. — Pract. Ent. i, p. 57. (Life history, etc.) 1891. Smith, J. B. — List of Lepidoptera, p. 65. 1892. Meyrick, E. — Trans Ent. Soc. London, pp. 53—140. (Classification of Geometrina of Europe.) 1893. Lintner, J. A. — Insect Life, Vol. 6, p. 184. (Mentioned as Eugonia.) 1895. Meyrick, E. — Handbook of British Lepidoptera. 1896. Hulst, G. D.— Trans. Amer. Ent. Soc., Vol. XXIII, p. 371. (Synonomy.) 1896. Lintner, J. A. — N. Y. State Ent. nth Rpt., .p. 121. (Mentioned.) 1896. Osborn, Herbert. — U. S. Dept. Agri. Div. Ent. Bull. 6 n. s., p. 80. (Injur- ing forests.) 1899. Lugger, Otto. — Minn. Agri. Expt. Stat. Bull. 61, p. 230. (Brief notice.) 1899. Smith, J. B. — Insects of New Jersey, p. 449. 1902. Dyar, H. G. — List of N. A. Lep., p. 336. 1903. Holland, W. J. — Moth Book, p. 348. (Distribution.) 1904. Garman, H. — Ken. Agri. Expt. Stat. Bull. 116, p. 79. (Life history on apple.) 1904. Kirby, W. F. — Hubner's Exot. Schmett., Ill, Additional notes, p. 164. (Lists Eudalimia subsignaria. Gives synonyms Ennomos subsignaria and Geometrina niveoseri- cearia.) 1904. Gibson, Arthur. — Rpt. Ent. Soc. Ont., 34th, p. 56. (Brief life history.) 1906. Felt, E. P. — N. Y. State Mus. Mem. 8, Vol. 2, p. 725. (Food plants.) 1908. —Jour. EC. Ent. Vol. i, No. 5, p. 330. (Dist. in N. Y. State.) 1908. Jour. EC. Ent. Vol. 2, No. 4, p. 306. (Presence in N. Y. State.) 1908. — N. Y. State Ent. Rpt. 23rd, p. 23. (Descrip., life history, etc.) 1908. Smith, J. B. — New Jersey State Ent. Rpt., p. 317. (Unusual abundance.) 1908. Britton, W. E. — Conn. State Ent. Rpt. 8th, p. 842. (Abundance of.) 1908. Broadwell, W. H. — Can. Ent. Vol. XL, pp. 327-328. 1908. Garman, H. — Ken. Agri. Expt. Stat. Bull. 133, p. 29. (Habits and life history.) 1909. Felt, E. P. — Jour. EC. Ent., p. 308. (Reference.) 1909. — N. Y. State Ent. Rpt. 24th, p. 51. (Injuries in 1908.) 1909. 'Broadwell, W. H.— Can. Ent. Vol. XLI, p. 392. 1909. Winn, A. F. — Ent. Soc. Ont. Rpt. 4oth, p. 56. (Unusual abundance of.) NOVEMBER, 1910 CIRCULAR No. 8 CORNELL UNIVERSITY AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION OF THE COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE Department of Entomology (Extension Work) Fir, THE ELM LEAF-BEETLE GLENN W. HERRICK About 1834 there was introduced into the city of Baltimore, from somewhere in Europe, a small in- conspicuous beetle whose food plant at home had been the European elms. It attracted no particular attention until about four years later, when it came into prominence as a serious enemy of the elms in this Maryland city. Since that time it has gradually extended its territory until now it is found as far north as Massachusetts and New York and westward to Ohio and Kentucky. In — \n adult NGW York State it is destruc- eim leaf-beetle. tive in the eastern and cen- tral sections, and very likely will gradually extend its activity until it covers the greater part of the State. THE APPEARANCE OF THE BEETLE, AND ITS WORK The insect is about one-fourth of an inch long. In general, it is yellowish or brownish yellow in color, with a dark line along each side of its back (Fig. i). Its color varies somewhat, and the over-wintering beetles are often so dark colored that the brownish yellow almost disappears and the black lines are hardly * noticeable. In its normal coloring it is quite likely to be confused with the common striped cucumber beetle, although it is considerably ^ 2 _Adult beetles eating larger. leaf in the spring. When the beetle first awakens in the spring from its long winter sleep, it flies to the elm trees just bursting into leaf and takes its first meal by eating small, irregular holes through the young, tender leaves (Fig. 2). After feeding a few days, the orange-colored eggs are depos- ited on the leaves and these in a few days more hatch into the tiny black and yellow grubs (Fig. 3). These grubs are the chief culprits. They work on both surfaces of the leaves, although mostly on the under sides, and eat so ravenously that in a few weeks nothing remains of the leaves except a bare network of veins. The effect on the leaves is serious, for they turn brown, curl, and finally fall from the trees. If the trees are vigorous enough and the season isTpropitious, a second crop of leaves is put out, but these may meet the same fate as the first. FIG. 3. — Young grubs eating leaf. EXTENT OF ITS INJURIES It was estimated that in 1898 1,000 fine elms were killed in the city of Albany and that in Troy the conditions were even worse. Similar condition's obtained in dozens of other towns in the Hudson Valley and along the Mohawk River. The writer has been told that a majority bf the magnificent elms in Harvard Yard have been destroyed within the last two or three years by the attacks of these small pests. There is danger that through inaction and apathy the splendid elms of our own City and Campus will suffer a like fate. Some of them are now probably past any effort to save them. FIG .4.— Eggs natural size, and much enlarged. Undoubtedly the elm leaf- beetle must be regarded as the most serious pest to shade- trees in this State. It prob- ably destroys more shade-trees, certainly more elm trees, than all other insect pests com- bined. STORY OF ITS LIFE In the fall of the year many of the full-grown beetles, in searching for snug crannies in which to pass the winter, find their way into* dwelling houses, congregating especially in the attics where they may often be found by the score. Housekeepers are some- times alarmed when they see so many of these beetles crawling on the window panes, walls, and ceilings of the rooms, likely thinking that here is another household pest. Fortunately, so far as the writer knows, these insects do not injure household articles of any descrip- tion. Other individuals hide away under loose pieces of bark on trees, in cracks in fences and telegraph poles, in outhouses, sheds, and in any other sheltered places they are able to find. Here they remain in a quiet, inactive condition through the long winter months. With the warm days of spring, the bee- tles awake and begin crawling about on the walks and on the window panes. As soon as the leaves begin to appear, the insects fly to the trees for their first spring meal. After feeding for some time they deposit their conspicuous orange-colored eggs (Fig. 4) in clusters of five to twenty-five on the undersides of the leaves. Each egg is flask-shaped and stands upright with its larger end attached to the leaf. The FIG. 5.— Grubs nearly grown, eggs hatch in five or six days during hot weather, but in cool FIG. 6. — Pupa of the elm leaf -beetle . weather this period may be prolonged several days. The writer found that in Ithaca, last year, the majority of the eggs were laid during the first three weeks of June. By June 2oth the young grubs wrere appearing in force. The grubs eat ravenously, increase in size very fast, and com- plete their growth in fifteen to twenty days (Fig. 5). When full grown they either crawl down the trunk of the tree or drop from the ends of the branches. At the bases of the trunks many of the larvae transform to the yellow pupae (Fig. 6). Some- times they are so numerous that the golden pupae lie an inch deep about the foot of the tree. Others transform in crevices of the bark, especially if the trunk is rough, others go to the gutters, while others seek shelter in crevices of the sidewalk and wherever they can find hiding places. The quiet, inactive pupae lie motionless for six to ten days and then trans- form to the adult beetles, thus completing the life round of one genera- tion. Our observations show that in Ithaca we have one generation, with a possible second, the latter, however, being so small as to cause no serious damage. METHODS OF CONTROL The elm leaf-beetle can be controlled effectively only, by spraying the trees with an arsenical poison, preferably arsenate of lead, at the rate of three or four pounds to fifty gallons of water. (See Fig. 7 for FIG. 7. — Sprayed elm at right, unsprayed at left. -I^!lfe*<;:> ; •<•--••-•• •••'••\te': sprayed and tmsprayed trees.) In order to be most effective, two spray- ings each year should be given, especially during the first season. If the work is well done the trees may not need another application for a year or two. The first spraying should be made while the leaves are unfolding and expanding, to kill as many of the adult beetles as possible before they commit injury or lay their eggs. The second spraying should be made about the second week in June in this locality, to kill the young grubs as soon as they begin to feed. Since they feed mainly on the lower surfaces of the leaves the poison mixture should be applied as much as possible to the undersides of the leaves. FIG. 8. — Hand-spray^ng outfit. SPRAYING APPARATUS Low and medium-sized trees can be sprayed very well with certain hand-spraying outfits, like the one in Fig. 8. A high step-ladder with an extension rod to which the nozzle may be attached will facilitate the work greatly. A nozzle capable of throwing a fine or coarse spray will probably be best. For large trees a power spraying outfit will be necessary. There are several makes of gasoline power sprayers on the market that can be bought for $250.00 to $300.00 (Fig. 9). COST OF SPRAYING Available data on this subject show that it costs twenty-five to sixty cents for a single applica- tion to a large tree if the work is done privately. If the work is performed on a large scale by a contractor it can be done more cheaply. If one can contract to have his trees sprayed twice in FIG. 9. —Power-spraying out-fit. °ne season for fifty cents a tree, for large trees, it would seem to be a reasonable price. If the trees are small, they should be sprayed for less. Figures 2, 3, 4 and 5 are from photographs by M. V. Slingerlarid. The draw- ings were made by Miss Anna Stryke. Bulletin 160. "**inuary, 1899. Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station. ITHACA, N. Y. HORTICULTURAL DIVISION. RURAL SCHOOL GROUNDS. By L. H. BAILEY. PUBLISHED BY THE UNIVERSITY, ITHACA, N. Y, 1899- ORGANIZATION. BOARD OF CONTROL: THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY. THE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE AND STATION COUNCIL. JACOB GOULD SCHURMAN, President of the University. FRANKLIN C. CORNELL, Trustee of the University. ISAAC. P. ROBERTS, Director of the College and 'Experiment Station. EMMONS L. WILLIAMS, Treasurer of the University. LIBERTY H. BAILEY, Professor of Horticulture. JOHN H. COMSTOCK, Professor of Entomology. STATION AND UNIVERSITY EXTENSION STAFF. I. P. ROBERTS, Agriculture. G. C. CALDWELL, Chemistry. JAMES LAW, Veterinary Science. J. H. COMSTOCK, Entomology. L. H. BAILEY, Horticulture. H. H. WING, Dairy Husbandry. G. F. ATKINSON, Botany. M. V. SLINGERLAND, Entomology. G. W. CAVANAUGH, Chemistry. L. A. CLINTON, Agriculture. B M. DUGGAR, Botany. J. W. SPENCER, Extension Work. J. L. STONE, Sugar Beet Investigation. MISS M. F. ROGERS, Nature-Study. A. L. KNISELY, Chemistry. C. E. HUNN, Gardening. W. W. HALL, Dairy Husbandry. W. E. GRIFFITHS, Dairy Husbandry. A. R. WARD, Dairy Bacteriology. L. ANDERSON, Dairy Husbandry. F. A. STEVENS, Demonstrator. OFFICERS OF THE STATION. I. P. ROBERTS, Director. E. L. WILLIAMS, Treasurer. EDWARD A. BUTLER, Clerk. CORNELL UNIVERSITY, January 2, 1899. HONORABLE COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE, ALBANY. Sir : In the effort to extend the teaching of nature and to popularize farming subjects, we have found the nature-study leaflets to be invaluable. These leaflets are now so well estab- lished in the estimation of New York teachers that we are obliged to print them in editions of 25,000. These afford subject-matter for direct teaching. But the surroundings of the child should also be such as to interest him in rural subjects. The home and the school premises should supplement the explicit work of the teacher. We have endeavored to provide suggestions for the improve- ment of home surroundings in a number of bulletins ; and we hope that more will follow. For many years, Professor Bailey has been studying the problem of the improvement of rural school grounds, but it is only now that he has felt that the time is ripe for a distinct movement in this direction. This bul- letin is the first move. It strikes at one of the greatest evils connected with the education of the farmer's children. We hope to follow up the movement, and eventually to give suggestions for the interior of the schoolhouse. These recommendations are the result of long study of trees and shrubs as adapted to New York State, and of the principles of landscape gardening. The report is submitted for publication as a bulletin under Chapter 67 of the L/aws of 1898. I. P. ROBERTS, Director. 2\.— Where children are taught. An actual example, in one of the most prosperous fruit-growing sections of New York. 22. — ^ suggestion in planting. HINTS ON RURAL SCHOOL GROUNDS. One's training for the work of life is begun in the home and fostered in the school. This training is the result of a direct and conscious effort on the part of the parent and teacher, combined with the indirect result of the surroundings in which the child is placed. The surroundings are more potent than we think ; and they are usually neglected. It is probable that the antipathy to 23. — The beginning and the end,— school house and graveyard. In eastern New York. farm life is formed before the child is able to reason on the subject. An attractive play-ground will do more than a profit- able wheat crop to keep the child on the farm. a. THE FACT. Bare, harsh, cheerless, immodest, — these are the facts about the average rural school ground. Observe Fig. 21. Children cannot be forced to like the school. They like it only 276 BULLETIN 160. when it is worth liking. And when they like it, they learn. The fanciest school apparatus will not atone for a charmless school ground. A child should not be blamed for playing truant if he is sent to school in a graveyard. Observe Fig. 23. It would seem that land is very precious. Very little of it can be afforded for a school ground. A quarter of an acre of good land will raise four bushels of wheat, and this wheat may be worth three or four dollars a year. We cannot afford to de- iBgE . 24. — A suggestion for a simple little schoolhouse. vote such valuable property to children. We can find a bit of swamp, or a sand hill, or a treeless waste. The first district school I taught was on a heartless hillside. The premises had two or three disconsolate oaks, and an old barrel was stuck in the top of one of them. The second school was on an island in a swamp. The mosquitoes loved it. The school building is generally little more than a large box. It has not even the charm of proper proportions. A different shape, with the same cost, might have made an attractive building. Even a little attention to design might make a great HINTS ON RURAL SCHOOL GROUNDS. 277 difference in the looks of a schoolhouse ; and the mere looks of a schoolhouse has a wonderful influence on the child. The railroad corporation likes to build good-looking station-houses, although they have no greater capacity than homely ones. I asked an architect for a simple plan of a cheap school house. He gave me Fig. 24. Plans for the improvement of shoolhouses may be obtained of the Superintendent of Public Instruction, Albany. The following sentences are extracted from the ' ' Report of the Committee of Twelve on Rural Schools," of the National Educational Association (1897) : ' The rural schoolhouse, generally speaking, in its' character and surroundings is depressing and degrading. There is nothing about it calculated to cultivate a taste for the beautiful in art or nature. ' ' "If children are daily surrounded by those influences that elevate them, that make them clean and well-ordered, that make them love flowers, and pictures, and proper decorations, they at last reach that degree of culture where nothing else will please them. When they grow up and have homes of their own, they must have them clean, neat, bright with pictures, and fringed with shade trees and flowers, for they have been brought up to be happy in no other environment." ' The rural schoolhouse should be built in accordance with the laws of sanitation and modern civilization. It never will be until the State, speaking through the Supervisor, compels it as a prerequisite for receiving a share of the public funds." b. HOW TO BKGIN A REFORM. We will assume that there is one person in each rural school district who desires to renovate and improve the school premises. There may be two. If this person is the school commissioner or the teacher, so much the better. Let this person call a meeting of the patrons at the school- house. Lay before the people the necessity of improving the premises. Quote the opinions of intelligent persons respecting the degrading influence of wretched surroundings ; or even read extracts from this bulletin. The cooperation of the most 278 BULLETIN 160 influential men of the district should be secured before the meeting is called. Propose a "bee" for improving the school grounds. John Smith will agree to repair the fence (or take it away, if it is not needed). Jones will plow and harrow the ground, if plowing is necessary. Brown will sow the grass seed. Black and Green and White will go about the neighborhood with their teams for trees and bushes. Some of these may be got in the edges of the woods, but many of the bushes can be picked up in front yards. Others will donate their labor towards grading, planting, and cleaning up the place. The whole thing can be done in one day. Perhaps Arbor Day can be chosen. C. THE PLAN OF THE PLACE. This is the most important part of the entire undertaking, — the right kind of a plan for the improvement of the grounds. The person who calls the meeting should have a definite plan in mind ; and this plan may be discussed and adopted. The remainder of this bulletin is devoted to plans for school grounds and means of working them out. If any person is interested in this subject, he should have our Bulletin 121, on the " Planting of Shrubbery." Begin with the fundamentals, not with the details. — If an artist is to make a portrait, he first draws a few bold strokes, representing the general outline. He ' ' blocks out ' ' the picture. With the general plan well in mind, he gradually works in the incidentals and the details, — the nose, eyes, beard. Most persons reverse this natural order when they plant their grounds. They first ask about the kinds of roses, the soil for snowballs, how far apart hollyhocks shall be planted. It is as if the artist first asked about the color of the eyes and the fashion of the neck-tie ; or as if the architect first chose the color of paint and then planned his building. The result of this type of planting is that there is no plan, and the yard means nothing when it is done. Begin with the plan, not with the plants. The place should mean something. — The home ground should be home-like, retired and cosy. The school ground should be set off from the bare fields and should be open enough HINTS ON RURAL SCHOOL GROUNDS. 279 to allow of play -grounds. It should be hollow, — well planted on the sides, open in the interior. The side next the highway should contain little planting. The place should be a picture, not a mere collection of trees and bushes. Fig. 25 shows what I mean, As seen in the picture (Fig. 25), this style of planting seems to be too elaborate and expensive for any ordinary place. But if the reader will bear with me, he shall learn otherwise. 25. — A picture, of which a schoolhouse is the central figure . Keep the center of the place open* — Do not scatter the trees over the place. They will be in the way. The boys will break them down. Moreover, they do not look well when scattered over the whole area. When an artist makes a picture with many people in it, he does not place the persons one by one all over his canvas. He masses them. Thereby he secures a stronger effect. He focusses attention, rather than distributes it. The diagrams (Figs. 26, 27), taken from Bulletin 121, make this conception plain. The same trees and shrubs can be used to make either a nursery or a picture. But it is more difficult to make the nursery, and to keep it in order, because the trees grow one at a place in the sod, and they are exposed to acci- dents. 280 BULLETIN 160. 26. — The co)nmon or nursery type of planting. Go to the blackboard. With four lines, represent the borders of the school grounds, as in Fig. 28. Indicate the schoolhouse and the out- buildings. Ex- isting trees may be located by small circles. Now you have the facts, or the fixed points. Now put in the walks. The first fixed point is the front door. The other fixed point is the place or places at which the children enter the grounds. Join these points by the most direct and simplest curves possible. That is all there is of it. In many, or perhaps most places, the house is so near the highway that only a straight walk is possible or advisable. Next comes the planting. Let it be irregular and natural, and rep- resent it by a wavy line, as in Fig. 28. First of all, cover upthe out-houses. Then plant heav- ily on the side next the swamp or a disagreeable barnyard, or in ™—~ur m the direction of 27. — The proper or pictorial type of planting. the prevailing wind. L/eave openings in your plan wherever there are views to be had of fine old trees, attractive farm homes, a brook, or HINTS ON RURAL SCHOOL GROUNDS. 281 28. — The blackboard plan. a beautiful hill or field. Throw a handful of shrubs into the corners by the steps, and about the bare corners of the building. You now have a plan to work to. It has been the work of five minutes at the blackboard. Sometimes the problem is not so simple as all this. There may be three entrances to the grounds and a highway on two sides. Fig. 29 is a plan made for such a place in western New York. It was thought to be necessary to separate the play -grounds of the boys and girls. This was done by a wide hedge-row of bushes running back from the schoolhouse. An interesting case as shown in Figs. 21 and 22. It is indecent j I to put the two out- buildings together. But it was assumed that it would not be allowable to move them. The place is bald and cheerless . The outlay of a day's work, and no money, might cause it to look like Fig. 22 inside of three or four years. Perhaps some per- sons object to so much 29. — Suggestions for the planting of a school- shrubbery. They look yard upon four corners. From "Lessons with Plants." uP°n lt: as mere brush. Very well ; then use trees alone. But do not scatter them hit and miss over the place. Throw them in at the side, as in Fig. 30. Give room for the children to play ; and make the place a picture at the same time. Three or four trees may be planted near the building to shade it, but the heaviest planting should be on the sides. 282 BULLETIN 160. The mere planting of trees and shrubs is the smaller part of the problem, — Arbor day has emphasized the mere planting of trees. Fortunately, many of the trees do not live. They are too often put in the wrong places. If the ^f,^,,^^B,^^,^-, «..«_™, love of trees could be m& 30. — A border planting of trees. combined with some purpose in the plant- ing, the results would be much better. Fig. 3 1 suggests Arbor Day planting ; and this is certainly much better than nothing. These four trees will be useful in their present positions, but the place will still remain bare. The great thing — the border planting- has been omitted, and the incidental thing has been done. Observe how the long foliage-mass adds charm to Fig. 32. A row is better than mere scattered trees. But even this planting- is not ideal. Heavy planting should have been made along the fence beyond the schoolhouse. There are too many trees between the border row and the house, although this is not a serious fault. A few bushes and vines would relieve the barrenness of the house ; so would one or two trees close against the house on the side next the road. But this place is so much more attrac- tive than most rural school premises that one ought not to find fault with it. d. HOW TO MAKE THE IMPROVEMENTS. Every effort should be exerted to do the work well in the begin- ning. If all preparations are thoroughly considered, and the details carried out with care, the premises should become more attractive year by year with almost no annual outlay of labor. The school grounds should be able to take care of themselves when once the place is set in order. Of course, better results HINTS ON RURAL SCHOOL GROUNDS. 283 are to be expected when much labor is put on the grounds each year, but it is useless to advise such expenditure for the rural 31. — Trees enough in the center, but the place needs a back-ground. 32. — A row of willows makes the place attractive. schools. But it is surprising what excellent results can be secured with almost no attention from year to year. The beau- 284 BULLETIN 160. tiful garden in Fig. 34 has received practically no labor for three years except that required to mow the grass. Making the sod. — In mail}' cases the school yard is already level or well graded and has a good sod, and it is not nec- essary to plow it and re-seed it. It should be said that the sod on old lawns can be renewed without plowing it up. In the bare or thin places, scratch up the ground with an iron-toothed rake, apply a little fertilizer, and sow more seed. Weedy lawns are those in which the sod is poor. It may be necessary to pull out the weeds ; but after they are out, the land should be quickly covered with sod or they will come in again. Annual weeds, as pigweeds, ragweed, can usually be crowded out by merely securing a heavier sod. A little clover seed will often be a good addition, for it supplies nitrogen and has an excellent mechanical effect on the soil. The ideal time to prepare the land is in the fall, before the heavy rains come. Then sow in the fall, and again in early spring on a late snow. However, the work may be done in spring, but the danger is that it will be put off so long that the young grass will not become established before the dry hot weather comes. The only outlay of money required for the entire improvement is for grass seed. The best lawn grass for New York is June- grass or blue-grass. Seedsmen know it as Poa pratensis. It weighs but 14 pounds to the bushel. Not less than three bush- els should be sown to the acre. We want many very small stems of grass, not a few large ones : for we are making a lawn, not a meadow. Do not sow grain with the grass seed. The June-grass grows slowly at first, however, and therefore it is a good plan to sow timothy with it, at the rate of two or three quarts to the acre. The timothy comes up quickly and makes a green ; and the June-grass will crowd it out in a year or two. If the land is hard and inclined to be too dry, some kind of clover will greatly assist the June-grass. Red clover is too large and coarse for the lawn. Crimson clover is excellent, for it is an annual, and it does not become unsightly in the lawn. White clover is perhaps best, since it not only helps the grass but looks well in the sod. One or two pounds of seed is generally sufficient for an acre. HINTS ON RURAL SCHOOL GROUNDS. 285 At first the weeds will come up. Do not pull them. Mow the lawn as soon as there is any growth large enough to mow. Of course, the lawn mower is best, but there is no use of recommend- ing it for rural school yards. Then use the ordinary field mower. When the sod is established, mowing the yard three or four times a year will be sufficient. And here is another advant- age of the open-centered yard which I have recommended, - it is easily mown. It would be a fussy matter to mow a yard planted after the fashion of Fig. 26 ; but one like Fig. 27, is easily managed. A yard like Fig. 25 can be mown in a half hour. How to make the border planting. — The borders should be planted thick. Plow up the strip. Never plant these trees and bushes in holes cut in the sod. Scatter the bushes and trees promiscuously in the narrow border. In home grounds, it is easy to run through these borders occasionally with a cultivator, for the first year or two. Make the edges of this border irregular. Plant the lowest bushes on the inner edge. Fig. 33 shows how a certain yard was marked out for the planting. The wThole area had been plowed, rolled, harrowed and raked. Grass seed had been sown and raked in. Then a line was drawn, by means of a rake handle, to represent the edges of the border planting. The interior or lawn space was now rolled, and th,e soft area along the borders was left for the planting. Five years later, the place looked as shown in Fig. 34. Imagine a schoolhouse at the end of that garden ! For all such things as lilacs, mock-oranges, Japan quinces, and bushes that are found along the roadsides, two or three feet apart is about right. Some will die anyway. Cut them back one-half when they are planted. They will look thin and stiff for two or three years; but after that they will crowd the spaces full, lop over on the sod, and make a billow of green. Prepare the land well, plant carefully ; andlet the bushes alone. The kinds of plants for the main planting.— We now come to the details, — the particular kinds of plants to use. One great principle will simplify the matter : the • main planting should be for foliage effects. That is, think first of giving the place a heavy bordermass. Flowers are mere decorations. Select those trees and shrubs which are the commonest, because 286 BULLETIN 160. they are cheapest, hardiest and most likely to grow. There is no district so poor and bare that enough plants cannot be secured, without money, for the school yard. You will find them in the woods, in old yards, along the fences. It is little matter if no one knows their names. What is handsomer than a tangled fence -row ? Scatter in a few trees along the fence and about the buildings. 33. — A newly made landscape garden, ready for the border planting . Maples, basswood, elms, ashes, buttonwood, pepperidge, oaks, beeches, birches, hickories, poplars, a few trees of pine or spruce or hemlock, — any of these are excellent. If the country is bleak, a rather heavy planting of evergreens about the border, in the place of so much shrubbery, is excellent. For shrubs, use the common things to be found in the woods and swales, together with roots which can be had in every old yard. Willows, osiers, witch hazel, dogwood, wild roses, thorn apples, haws, elders, sumac, wild honeysuckles, — these and others can be found in every school district. From the farm yards can be secured snowballs, spireas, lilacs, forsythias, mock- 288 BULLETIN 160. - oranges, roses, snowberries, barberries, flowering cur- rants, honeysuckles and the like. Vines can be used to ex- cellent purpose on the out- buildings or on the school- house itself. The com- mon wild Virginia creeper (shown on the right in Fig. 36) is the most serviceable. On brick or stone school houses the Boston ivy or Japanese ampelopsis may be used, unless the lo- 35. — It is easy to make*ayard as good as this, cation is very bleak. This is not hardy in the northern parts of the State. Honeysuckles, clematis and bitter-sweet are also attrac- tive. Bowers are always interesting to children ; and actinidia (to be had at nurseries) is best for this purpose. Kinds of plants for decoration.— Against these heavy borders and in the angles about the building, many kinds of flowering plants can be grown. The flowers are much more easily cared for in such positions than they are in the middle of the lawn, and they also show off better. Notice how striking the holyhocks are in Figs. 34 and 37. They have a back- ground. Even a clump of weeds looks well when it is in the right place. Observe Fig. 36. It is impossible to grow many flowers in the school ground under present con- ditions, for what is everybody's busi- creeper. How pretty they are ! ness is nobody's business ; and then, the place is neglected all through HINTS ON RURAL SCHOOL GROUNDS. 289 the summer. But the children can be taught to plant many things. Only those flowers should be used which are very easy to grow and which have the habit of taking care of themselves. They should also be such as bloom in spring or fall, when the school is in ses- sion. Perennial plants — those which live from year to year — are excellent. Of these, day lilies, bleed- ing hearts, pinks, bluebells, hollyhocks, perennial phlox and hibiscus, are always useful. Nothing is better than the common wild asters and golden- rods. They will grow almost anywhere and they improve when grown in rich ground and given ZI. — plenty of room ; and they bloom in the fall. Many kinds of bulbs are useful, especially as so many of them bloom very early in spring. We propose to issue^a nature-study leaflet on this subject the coming season. Think of a school yard with crocuses, daffodills and tulips in it \ Annual flowers may be grown along the borders, out of the way of the play-grounds. China asters, petunias and Cali- fornia poppies are very attractive, and they are easy to grow. They bloom in the fall. Phlox, swreet peas, allyssum, and many others are also useful. Consult Bulletin 161. While the main planting should be made up of common trees and shrubs, a rare or strange plant may be introduced now and then from the nurseries, if there is any money with which to buy such things. Plant it at some conspicuous point just in front of the border, where it will show oil well, be out of the way, and have some relation to the rest of the planting. Two or three purple-leaved or variegated-leaved bushes will add much spirit and verve to the place ; but many of them make the place look fussy and overdone. e. GENERAL REMARKS. More than one-third of all public schools will probably always be in the country. They will have most intimate relations with rural life. We must make that life attractive to the pupils. In Europe there are school gardens, and similar plans are 290 BULLETIN 160. recommended for this country. It is certainly desirable that some area be set aside for the actual cultivation of plants by the children and for the growing of specimens to be used in the school room. However, the conditions of Europe are very different from ours. In the rural school in Germany and other countries, the school house is the teacher's home. He lives in it, or by it. The summer vacation is short. In this country, there is no one to care for the rural school ground in the long summer vacation. Teachers change frequently. It is impossible to have uniformity and continuity of purpose. In the Old World, the rural schools are in the hamlets. We shall be very glad to correspond with any persons who are interested in improving school premises, either on the lines herein suggested, or in other directions. The improvement must come, or, one by one, the rural schools will die out .for lack of pupils. In the struggle for existence, the pupils will more and more seek the more attractive schools. There must be rural schools, whether in the open country or in the hamlet ; and wherever they are, they must be cheered and brightened. A Flower Day every October would be a fitting complement of Arbor Day. Already, flower shows have been held in various rural schools. They are symbols of the harvest. We want to focali/e this movement in the coming year. We call upon ever)7 citi/en for sympathy and cooperation. A revolution in rural school grounds will not come suddenly. Here and there a beginning will be made ; and slowly the great work will spread. L. H. BAILEY. Bulletin 168. May, 1899. Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station, ITHACA, N. Y. BOTANICAL DIVISION: Studies and Illustrations OF — MUSHROOMS: II. " By the rose flesh mushrooms, undivulged Last evening. Nay, in to-day' s first dew Yon sudden coral nipple bulged, Where a freaked, fawn-colored, flaky crew Of toadstools peep indulged.''1 Browning's By the Fireside. THREE EDIBLE SPECIES OF COPRINUS. By GEO. F. ATKINSON. PUBLISHED BY THE UNIVERSITY, ITHACA, N. Y. I899. ORGANIZATION. BOARD OF CONTROL : THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY THE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE AND STATION COUNCIL. JACOB GOULD SCHURMAN, President of the University. FRANKLIN C. CORNELL, Trustee of the University. ISAAC P. ROBERTS, Director of the College and Experiment Station. EMMONS L. WILLIAMS, Treasurer of the University. LIBERTY H. BAILEY, Professor of Horticulture. JOHN H. COMSTOCK, Professor of Entomology. STATION AND UNIVERSITY EXTENSION STAFF. I. P. ROBERTS, Agriculture. G. C. CALDWELL, Chemistry. JAMES LAW, Veterinary Science. J. H. COMSTOCK, Entomology. L. H. BAILEY, Horticulture. H. H. WING, Dairy Husbandry. GEO. F. ATKINSON, Botany. M. V. SLINGERLAND, Entomology. G. W. CAVANAUGH, Chemistry. L. A. CLINTON, Agriculture. W. A. MURRILL, Botany. J. W. SPENCER, Extension Work. J. L. STONE, Sugar Beet Investigation MISS M. F. ROGERS, Nature-Study. A. L. KNISELY, Chemistry. C. E. HUNN. Horticulture. G. W. TAILBY, Foreman of the Farm. A. R. WARD, Dairy Bacteriology. L. ANDERSON, Dairy Husbandry. OFFICERS OF THE STATION I. P. ROBERTS, Director. E. L. WILLIAMS, Treasurer. EDWARD A. BUTLER, Clerk. Office of Director, Room 20, Morrill Hall. CORNELL UNIVERSITY, ITHACA, May 15, 1899. HONORABLE COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE, ALBANY, N. Y. Sir: This bulletin, the second of a series of "Studies and Illustrations of Mushrooms," is submitted under Chapter 67 of the Laws of 1898. The object of these studies is to give accu- rate information upon, and illustrations of, the more common mushrooms or toad-stools. This should enable interested per- sons to collect and determine specimens occurring from spring to late autumn. Large numbers of the edible species go to waste each year for the want of some clear and ready information to assist in distinguishing the edible from the poisonous kinds. It is to be regretted that in the smaller cities, in suburban districts, and upon the farms, more attention is not given to learning to know well a few of the more common species, since the fields and woods where these plants grow are so easy of access. By careful attention to the localities and by comparison of the plants with the descriptions and illustrations given in these bulletins, a person having no botanical knowledge can identify a number of these plants. Every one has, or should have, a certain amount of leisure time which can be devoted to recreation, or relief from the every day work. Many find enjoy- ment and profit in combining such recreation with an interest in some observation upon nature and natural objects. Having learned to recognize the edible species, it is possible thereafter to readily collect for food large numbers of the more common ones. Some of these plants are so easily determined that children only eight years old, after seeing the photographs of two of the species illustrated in this bulletin, were able later to name the plants from freshly collected specimens, without the opportunity of a comparison with the photographs. One not familiar with the subject should use caution in the first collections of an unknown plant. It is well in some cases 492 BULLETIN 168. to consult some one who does know the plants, or who has the means of determining them. In such cases, the Botanical Division of this Station is ready to assist in the identification. Directions for collecting and mailing specimens are given in the present bulletin. With some attention to this subject there is no reason why, in America, mushrooms should not form as important an article of food as they do in parts of the Old World. Professor Atkinson has made a large number of photographs of the edible and poisonous mushrooms, as well as of those wood destroying species so destructive to timber and forest trees. I. P. ROBERTS, Director. STUDIES AND ILLUSTRATIONS OF MUSH- ROOMS, II. Three Edible Species of Coprinus. I — THK SHAGGY-MANE (Coprinus contains] . The "shaggy-mane," or "horsetail mushroom" (Coprinus comatus) , is one of the largest plants of this genus. It is usually considered by many to surpass all the other species of the genus in those qualities most esteemed by the fungus eater. The frontispiece is from a photograph of a group of these plants growing in a lawn on the Cornell University Campus. All stages of the "horsetail" are here represented, from the tiny ones which are thrusting their heads through the turf to the old ones which present an unsightly aspect as they are melting down into inky blackness, an example of the swiftness with which it passes its ephemeral existence. A day, or at most two or three days is vouchsafed to it during which it is to lift itself up into the free air, where it may expand and mature its spores. Then it vanishes. But it has accomplished the final purpose for which it exists as an organism. Its "seed," the spores are free to be carried by the wind or other agencies of dissemination to distant places, and thus propagate the species. While the natural mode of the wide dissemination of the plant is probably by the distribution of the spores, dissemination may take place through the agency of man or other animals when the soil is disturbed. Some of the ' ' spawn ' ' may be transplanted in the sod for covering new lawns, or in the fertilizer for old ones. Here food lying hidden in the soil is awaiting forage at the pleasure of the searching threads of the mycelium or "spawn," which now spreads its meshes as it extends through the earth. Here it grows for months or sometimes for years may be, laying b}7 sup- plies in the shape of an increased amount of "spawn." We tread upon the soft carpet of green or recline on the sod unmind- 494 BULLETIN 168. (34) ful of the process of growth, absorption and assimilation in that wonderful unseen world of plant life. Suddenly some morning we see the shaggy, unkempt heads of our old friends again just risen from their long sleep which calls to mind Browning's verse,— ' ' By the rose flesh mushrooms undivulged L/ast evening. Nay, in to-day's first dew Yon sudden coral nipple bulged, Where a freaked, fawn-colored flaky crew Of toad-stools peep indulged. ' ' 83. — "Shaggy-mane" (Coprinus contains} in lawn. A " mushroom growth," we say. It looks that way ; as if the whole thing had grown in a single night. That is because we have not searched underneath the sod and observed the long, tedious process of growth while the cords and meshes of the mycelium have increased, and extended their lines through the moist soil. If we do search there and observe we see that some- time before the shaggy heads peep forth, tiny bodies appear on the cords of mycelium ; first like a pin head in size, then as large as a pea and the size of a thimble they grow. A great deal of (35) STUDIES AND ILLUSTRATIONS OF MUSHROOMS : II. 495 growth has taken place in the formation of these tiny bodies beneath the soil. They are made up of delicate threads and the tiniest cells which have multiplied until there are countless num- bers of them. Now when every thing is ready in these fungus "buttons," the tiny cells already formed, as well as new ones still forming, expand rapidly and this pushes the mushroom up into view in a single night. In figure 84 are shown two buttons of the size when they are just ready to break through the soil. They are now quite dark 84. — " Buttons'1'1 of Coprinus ; two in section, showing gill slits and hollow stem. (Natural size. ) in color on the outside. They appear mottled with dark and white, for the outer layer of fungus threads, which are dark brown, is torn and separated into patches or scales, showing between, the delicate meshes of white threads which lie beneath. The upper part of the button is already forming the cap or "pileus," and the slight constriction about midway shows the lower boundary or margin of the pileus where it is still connected with the undeveloped stem. We are curious to know if the internal structure of these but- tons will reveal the parts of the mushroom. We can learn this by splitting buttons through from one end to the other with a 496 BULLETIN 168. (36) sharp knife. At the right of each of these buttons in the figure is shown a section of a plant of the same age. Here the parts of the plant though still undeveloped are quite well marked out. Just underneath the pileus layer are the gills. In the section 85. — Coprinus comatus, removed from soil. (Natural size.} one gill is exposed to view on either side. They are long, narrow, and taper at each end. In the section of the larger button the free edge of the gill is still closely applied to the stem, while in (37) STUDIES AND ILLUSTRATIONS OF MUSHROOMS : II. 497 the small one the gills are separated a short distance from the stems showing "gill slits." Here, too, the connection of the margin of the pileus with the stem is still shown. From our first study of mushrooms (Bulletin 1 38) we know that this connecting layer between the margin of the pileus and stem forms the veil. This kind of a veil is a marginal veil. The stem is hollow even at this young stage, and a slender cord of mycelium extends down the center of the tube thus formed as is shown in the sections. From the button stage the growth is quite rapid, and in a short while the plants are full grown. Now the plants are nearly all white. The brown scales so close together on the buttons are widely separated except at the top or center of the pileus, where they remain close together and form a broad cap resting jauntily on the shaggy head. This is shown in figure 85 which is from a photo- graph of three plants removed from the sod. A study of the different stages, which appear from the button stage to the mature plant, reveals the cause of this change in color and the wide separation of the dark brown scales. The threads of the outer layer of the pileus, and especially those in the brown patches seen on the buttons, soon 86. — Coprinus comatus, well mer- iting the name "shaggy mane". (Natural size.) 498 BULLETIN 168. (38) cease to grow, though they are firmly entangled with the inner layers. Now the threads underneath and all through the plant, in the gills and in the upper part of the stem grow and elongate rapidly. This pulls on the outer layer tearing it in the first place into small patches and causing them later to be more widely separated on the mature plant. Some of these scales remain quite large while others are torn up in- to quite small tufts. As the plant ages, the next inner layers of the pileus grow less rapidly, so that the white layer beneath the brown is torn up into an intricate tangle of locks and tufts, or is frazzled into a delicate pile which exists here and there between well formed tufts. While all present the same general characters there is consider- able individual variation as one can see by comparing a number of different plants. Figure 86 shows one of the interesting conditions. There is little of the brown color, and the outer portion of the pileus is torn into ^.—Coprinus comatus, surface of pileus long locks, quite evenly dis- gatheredin loups. (Natural size}. tributed and curled up at the ends in an interesting fashion which merits well the term "shaggy." In others the threads are looped up quite regularly into triangular tresses which appear to be knotted at the ends where the tangle of brown threads holds them together as if some fairy had plaited the lock. There is one curious feature about the expansion of the pileus (39) STUDIES AND ILLUSTRATIONS OF MUSHROOMS: II. 499 of the shaggy-mane which could not escape our attention. The pileus has become very long while comparatively little lateral 88. — Coprinus comatus, sections of the three plants shoiun in figure 85. (Natural size}. expansion has taken place. The pileus has remained cylindrical or barrel-shaped, while in the case of the mushrooms treated of in our first study the pileus expanded into the form of an umbrella. 500 BULLETIN 168. (40) The cylindrical or barrel-shaped pileus is characteristic of the shag- gy-mane mush- room. As the pileus elongates the stem does also, but more rapidly. This tears apart the connection of the margin of the pileus with the base of the stem, as is plainly shown in figure 85. In breaking away, the con- necting portion or veil, is freed both from the stem and from the margin o f the pileus, and is left as a free, o r loose ring, around the stem. In all of the plants of our for- mer study, the common mush- room (Agaricus campestris) , the smooth lepiota (Lfpiota nauci- na) , and the deadly amanita (Amanitap hallo- ides) , the ring remained attached to the stem, i. e., it is not a free ring in those 89. — Coprinus comatus, early stage of diliquescence. The ring is lying on the sod. (Natuial size.} (41) STUDIES AND ILLUSTRATIONS OF MUSHROOMS : II. 501 species. In the shaggy-mane the veil does not form a thin expanded curtain as in the three species just enumerated. It is really an annular outer layer of the button lying between the margin of the base of the stem, from the stem, gates more rap- pileus, the latter u p away r base of the Sometimes the free pileus and the It becomes free As the stem elon- idly than the is lifted from the K\ stem. annulus is left as a of the stem, still superficial 1 a yer of for a time more or margin o f the pileus at the left hand in lifted higher up on comes free from the dangling somewhere break and fall down instances it may re- herent to the margin breaks apart as the somewhat. In such for some time to dis- sterile margin of the its outer texture re- ure of the pileus. 90. — Coprinus com ing more expanded. (Natural size). collar around the base loosely adherent to the the same, or it remains less adherent to the as shown in the plant figure 85. It is often the stem before it be- pileus, and is then left on the stem, or it may on the sod. In other main quite firmly ad- of the pileus so that it pileus in age expands cases one of ten searches cover it clinging as a • pileus, so closely does semble the outer text- It is interesting to ob- serve a section of the plants at this stage. These sections can be made by splitting the pileus and stem lengthwise through the middle line with a sharp knife as shown in figure 88. Here, in 502 BULLETIN 168. (42) the plant at the right hand, the "cord" of mycelium is plainly seen running through the hollow stem. This cord is well seen 91. — Coprinns contains, drops of inky fluid about to fall from wasted pileus. (Nutural size}. (43) STUDIES AND ILLUSTRATIONS OF MUSHROOMS : II. 503 if one partly splits a stem and then gently pulls the halves apart. At the same time if the stem is held toward the light a very deli- cate mesh of threads, reminding one of the finest gauze, is seer- extending from the cord to the wall of the tubular stem. The gills form a large portion of the plant for they are very broad and lie closely packed side by side. They are nowhere attached to the stem but at the upper end round off to the pileus leaving a well defined space between their ends and the stem. The pileus, while it is rather thick at the center, i. e., where it joins the stem, becomes comparatively thin where it spreads out over the gills. At this age of the plant the gills are of a rich salmon color, i.