ECOb BOT 7 • Jk r // J / -a- ,• --r . THE ^hannaputipl Journal AND Cransatlifftrs. Irmnimcattical Journal AND Sran»atti0«s. THIRD SERIES. VOLUME XI,1 1880-81. LONDON: J. & A. CHURCHILL, NEW BURLINGTON STREET; Edinburgh, MACLACHLAN & STEWART; Dublin, FANNIN & Co.; Leipzig, TWIETMEYER. 1881. r V i PRINTED BY STEVENS AND RICHARDSON, C4REAT QUEEN STREET, LINCOLN’S INN FIELDS, LONDON, W.C. ? v . YOL. XI.— JULY 3, 1880. THE ORIGIN OF THE “GUM” OF QUEBRACHO COLORADO. BY DR. AUGUST VOGL, Honorary Member of the Pharmaceutical Society. Through the kindness of my friend, Mr. J. Wibiral, head of the firm “ Pfantzert’s Successor ” here, I obtained a piece of the wood, about two decimetres long, known under the name of “quebracho Colorado,” now much in request as a tanning material, and to a certain extent employed medicinally. It is generally referred to Loxopterigium Lorentzii, Anacardiaceae, Grisebach (Argentine Republic). The piece of wood in question showed crevices and hollow spaces about eight centimetres long and lour centimetres broad, the walls of which were deeply cleft and covered with a remarkable friable, almost black, resinous mass, reminding one of certain species of kino, ruby red at the angles, transparent, breaking with a conchoidal fracture, and strongly astringent. This evidently was the so-called quebracho gum, with reference to which there is an interesting communication by Pedro N. Arata in the Pharma¬ ceutical Journal and Transactions , 1878, p. 531 (from the Anal, de la Sociedad Cientifica Argentina , July, 1878). The conditions under which this substance, which can very well be named quebracho-kino, appears, and which are quite analogous to those which afford the so-called “ angelin-pedraharz ”* and the well known “araroba,”t lead to the supposition that they owe their origin to a disorganization of the wood, which supposition is in fact confirmed by a fuither histological investigation. I will briefly communi¬ cate my results as a supplement to the work of Arata above quoted. The heavy, tough, and very hard wood possesses on the whole a bright brownish-red colour. In a polished transverse section it shows bright medullary rays very near to each other, and in the narrow wood rays very numerous vessels as bright spots, and at long intervals from each other run narrow rays of wood parenchyma. About the crevices, above men¬ tioned as being covered with excretion, the wood takes an almost black colour, which renders the coarse structure relatively indistinct, and which finally quite disappears in the clefts upon which the mass of excretion lies or into which it rather flows. * ‘ Pringslieim’s Jahrb. fiir. Bot. / ix. t ‘ Comment, zur oester. Pharrn.,* third edition, p. 43G. Third Series, No. 523. The structure of the wood of quebracho Colorado has been briefly described by me (in ‘ Der Gerber,’ 1878) and more fully later by J. Moller (‘ Berichte fiber die W eltaustellung,’ Paris, 1878, part 8). Only the most important characteristics need be here referred to. The principal medullary rays, generally three cells broad and usually accompanied on either side by cells containing crystals, consist on the whole of pitted cells, not thick walled, extended in a radial direction (fig. 1, m) ; together with these are secondary rays one cell broad. The wood rays have as a ground tissue libriform fibres (fig. 1, T), besides to a small extent wood parenchyma, partly standing alone, partly in simple layers surrounding the vessels. The latter are generally very broad, thick walled, with bordered pits and large thyllen, sometimes containing crystals, either alone or in radiate groups of two to five, seldom more. The oxalate of lime crystals occurring in the wood are, in part, very large, frequently double, and belong to the kliuo- rhombic system. Sections from the unaltered (bright brownish-red portion of the wood show, under water, as contents of the tissue, an amorphous mass coloured olive- green by ferric chloride, completely soluble in water, alcohol, and with heat in solution of potash. This mass is more granular and bright red in colour in the libriform cells and wood parenchyma, and ho¬ mogeneous, clotted, and brownish-red in the vessels and medullary rays. The cell walls appear to be yellowish or reddish- yellow, and indeed the primary (the border layers a) are intensely coloured. Long continued warming in water decolorizes the above, and at the same time there appears consider¬ able swelling of the secondary layers (ft), especially in the vessels and libriform cells. Chloriodide of zinc colours them (but not the primary membrane) violet; iodine with sulphuric acid renders them blue. Sections from the black portion of the wood show an essentially different behaviour of the elementary tissues. All are so densely filled with the brownish- red contents that without further treatment it is difficult to understand the structure. This can only be done by removing the contents of the cells with one of the above solvents. The most remarkable change is shown in the libriform fibres. In a trans¬ verse section boiled in water (fig. 4) the secondary layers remarkable by their swelling in the same preparation from the unaltered wood (fig. 2) are not visible ; but inside the brownish-red primary mem¬ brane lie merely the remains of the above in the 2 THL PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [July 3, 1SS0. form of a shrunken colourless skin, separated from the cell wall by a distinct interval (fig 4, 6). Explanation of the Accompanying Drawings. Part of a transverse section from the wood of Quebracho Colorado strongly magnified. m, m, medullary rays. I, l, libriform cells. a, a, primary membrane. b, h, secondary layers (second cell membrane). Pigs. 1 and 2, from the unaltered (bright brownish-red), figs. 3 to 5, from the altered (black) portion of the wood. Pig. 2. Boiled in water. b, much swollen. Pig. 3. Libriform cells under water, densely filled with amorphous brown-red contents. Pig. 4. After boiling in water. Libriform cells with the shrivelled remains of the secondary layers separated from the cell wall. Medullary rays with spiral bands. Pig. 5. Boiled in water. Libriform cells more changed than in fig. 4. Primary membrane partly torn. In a longitudinal section these remains of the secondary deposits appear as thin, thick, or narrow spiral bands. The cells also of the medullary rays in the transverse section (fig. 4, m) show spiral bands. The nearer to the excreted gum, the more evident the changes become. Finally, a part is reached where in a transverse section, after solution of the cell contents, a thin brown cellular network with polygonal meshes is met with, formed from primary membrane, and corresponding to the fundamental tissue. This shows numerous disruptions (fig. 5), especially as it appears in a radial direction. The remains of the secondary layers are visible in single cells only. In the vessels, and especially in the border cells, a withering away of the cell mem¬ brane is observed. In the mass of gum which lies immediately on the wood are found only more or less numerous pieces of tissue in a very shrivelled condition, besides the above remains, and on the exterior the perfectly homo¬ geneous kino-like mass of excretion is seen. If a small portion of the brick-red powder be treated with solution of potash under the microscope, only single crystals of oxalate of lime, of the same form as that in which they occur in the wood, and a few colourless membranous flakes are observed. The latter, after neutralization with acetic acid and treat¬ ment with chloriodide of zinc, are coloured blue, by which they are known as remains of cell tissue and their origin recognized. The above mentioned facts indicate that the so- called “gum” forming constituents appear first of all as cell contents in the wood, that these under certain conditions, and in some parts, are increased at the cost of the cell wall, and further that, in the first place, secondary layers undergo this meta¬ morphosis, and, lastly, the primary membrane. Vienna. CHARACTERISTICS OF ACONITINE AND ALLIED ALKALOIDS. BY C. R. ALDER-WRIGHT, D.SC. BOND. Aconitine (C33H43lSr012 or 07 j q^qq^q Hr0 — This alkaloid appears to be the chief, if not the only active alkaloidal ingredient in the roots of A. Napellus , occurring therein together with amor¬ phous alkaloids of lower molecular weight, and con¬ taining a higher percentage of carbon. From these alkaloids the free base partially separates by solution in ether and spontaneous evaporation, the ether being preferable previously mixed with very light petro¬ leum spirit, as recommended by Duquesnel. If the amount of aconitine present relatively to the amor¬ phous bases is not considerable it is often impossible to get the former to crystallize at all (at any rate on the small scale) ; in any case a considerable amount of aconitine is retained in solution permanently by the agency of the amorphous alkaloids, which thus cause considerable loss, much as alkaline salts do in the case of sugar crystallization. Even after re¬ peated crystallization from ether or ether-petroleum spirit, aconitine retains mechanically minute quanti¬ ties of the amorphous bases, which, however, can be wholly eliminated by conversion into a salt, crystal¬ lization thereof, and regeneration of the alkaloid (by treatment with an alkali and crystallization from ether) from the salt thoroughly freed from the mother liquor which contains the amorphous base as salt: the hydrochloride, hydrobromide, and nitrate are salts answering well for this purpose, especially the two last. When perfectly pure, aconitine melts in a capillary tube at 183° — 184° (corrected), the melting point being lowered by the presence of amorphous bases ; the final complete melting is preceded by a slight fritting, beginning a few degrees below the melting point, and is accompanied by only very slight darken¬ ing with the pure base, by more if impure. This test together with the following constitute the two simplest criteria of purity. The alkaloid to be examined is dissolved in a few drops of some dilute acid, some puae ether added, and then some sodium carbonate solution in excess and the whole well agi¬ tated in a stoppered bottle; the ethereal solution is decanted and allowed to evaporate spontaneously; when only a small quantity is left this is decanted from the crystals that have formed into another July 3, 1880.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 3 vessel and allowed to evaporate to dryness. If the aconitine were tolerably pure the last drops of ethe¬ real mother liquor will dry up to crystals; but if more than minute quantities of amorphous bases were present these will accumulate in the mother liquor, the last portions of which will dry up not to crystals, but to a varnish or gum-like mass. The gold salt of aconitine should not darken on drying over sulphuric acid in the dark (presence of amorphous alkaloids often causes decomposition to a small extent on drying) ; after desiccation, first over sulphuric acid till visibly dry and finally in the water-bath, it should contain a trifle under 20*00 per cent, of gold (theoretical percentage 19*92). If the base contain traces of amorphous alkaloids, the gold percentage is a little higher, specimens purified only by crystallization from ether generally containing 20*2 to 20*3 per cent, of gold. On heating for some hours to 100Q in a closed vessel with alcohol and a little caustic potash, aconitine should yield, close to 19 per cent.' of benzoic acid (theo¬ retical percentage 18*92), which can be extracted and estimated by evaporation of the alkaline fluid to dry¬ ness, solution in water, treatment with hydrochloric acid and ether, and spontaneous evaporation of the ethereal solution, with purification of the residue from resinous bye-products if necessary. The acid thus formed should not produce any substance capable of giving a green colour to ferric chloride on fusion at 250° with caustic potash, and treatment of the “melt” with hydrochloric acid and ether, and evaporation to dryness of the ethereal solution (indicates freedom from pseudaconitine). Pure aconitine should contain close to the theore¬ tical amounts of carbon and hydrogen, viz. 61*39 and 6*67 per cent, respectively. These analytical figures are the only reliable means of distinguishing aconi¬ tine from the closely allied alkaloid recently de¬ scribed under the. provisional name “japaconitine” (vide infra), which agrees very closely with aconitine in all the other above named points. Pseudaconitine — (^30^-49^^12 0r ^Hg^NOg | the chief if not the only active ingredient in A. Ferox roots. Considerably less easily crystallizable than aconitine; melting point when pure near to 104° — 105° (not very distinctly marked, lritting commencing a few degrees lower), no darkening in colour accom¬ panying the final fusion. No conclusions as to purity can be drawn from the incomplete crystal- lizability of the base (or its nitrate), as infinitesimal amounts of impurity, too small for analytical deter¬ mination, and other circumstances greatly affect the crystallizing power. Should yield on u saponifica¬ tion” with alcoholic potash near to the theoretical amount of veratric (dimethylprotocatechuic) acid, o*ch3 o*ch3 CO-OH (viz. 26*49 per cent.), especially after purification of the acid formed from resinous bye-products ; and should give analytical numbers near to the following theoretical values Carbon in base (anhydrous) . . . 62*88 Hydrogen in base „ ... 7*13 Gold in Gold Salt „ . . . 19*10 Slightly higher percentages of gold being found (as with aconitine) when the base is only purified by crystallization from ether, and hence retains minute quantities of the amorphous bases occurring together with it in the roots. Japaconitine (C06H88N2O21). — Provisional name applied to a base occurring in aconite roots (query as to species) recently imported into England from J apan. First examined by Paul and Kingzett, who attributed to it the formula C29H43N09. Exhibits very close similarity to aconitine, furnishing almost exactly the same amount of benzoic acid on saponifi¬ cation (theoretical percentage 19*6), and melting at almost the same temperature, but slightly higher (184° — 186° instead of 183° — 184° corrrected). Crys¬ tallizes from ether just about as readily as aconitine, furnishes very similar salts, and can only be dis¬ tinguished conveniently by analytical numbers, the theoretical values being uniformly higher than with aconitine, viz. : — Carbon in free base . 63*67 Hydrogen in free base .... 7*07 Gold in Gold Salt ...... 20*39 ETHYL BROMIDE.* BY LAWRENCE WOLFF, M.D. Progressive medicine has again confronted the pharma¬ cist in this substance with a new remedial agent, which promises fair to stand the test of time much better than the host of new remedies which are almost daily pressed into the ranks of our therapeutic allies, and it is therefore I think it merits closer investigation, in order that it be offered to the medical profession in its highest possible perfection. In view that already our literature shows a great deal of research and a thorough knowledge of the production of this new agent, I do not claim to here propose radical innovations, but merely desire to call attention to such modifications as will assist in obtaining it in its pure state at the lowest possible price. Ethyl bromide, the hydrobromic ether of older che¬ mists, discovered by Serullas in 1827, shortly after the discovery of bromine itself, received but little attention as a therapeutic agent until Dr. Nunnelly, of Leeds, England, called attention to it as a useful anaesthetic in 1865. Rabuteau, of Paris, |igain created considerable interest by his experiments with it on the lower animals in 1876, but the credit of bringing it out prominently, and, as it now seems, permanently, is due to Dr. Lawrence Turnbull, and the hearty co-operation, persevering efforts and experiments of Dr. R. J. Levis, both of Philadelphia. The latter has already used it in hundreds of oases, and as yet no untoward accident has occurred at his hands. Its early preparation by the discoverer was based upon the action of phosphorus on bromine in presence of alcohol, which Personne, in 1861, modified by substituting amorphous phosphorus instead, and which was subse¬ quently more rationally conducted by Professor Reming¬ ton. The process of De Vrij, by decomposing potassic bromide with sulphuric acid in presence of alcohol, was an improvement which was followed out by Dr. Greene, but which never served me, in the proportions mentioned, to obtain any appreciable quantity of the ethyl bromide. Its chemical composition was early determined to be C2H5Br, its specific gravity 1*40, and its boiling point 106° F.; it will not burn, and its vapours will even extinguish flame. Finding considerable objection to the product of the earlier process on account of its alliaceous odour, probably due to free phosphorus or an ethyl phosphide, I was soon led to produce it by De Yrij’s method, which, however, I found deficient in the amount of sulphuric acid, and * Read before the Philadelphia College of Pharmacy. From the Amencan Journal of Pharmacy , May, 1880. 4 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [July 3, 1$!>0. it was not until I had almost trebled its quantity that I succeeded in completely converting the entire amount of alcohol into ethjd bi'omide. The process I employed, and, after various experiments and modifications, found to answer best, is as follows : — Twenty-four ounces of potassic bromide, coarsely powdered, are added to a mixture of 64 ounces of sul¬ phuric acid and 32 ounces of water. After the mixture has sufficiently cooled, 16 fiuidounces of alcohol (95 per cent.) are added thereto, the whole placed in a large flask contained in a sand-bath, and connected with a Liebig’s condenser, heat applied sufficiently that the contents of the flask should be at about 200° E., and there to be main¬ tained until the reaction, which will go on quite lively for a while, shall have ceased, and the ethyl, which has rapidly been gathering in a receiver containing about 1 ounce of water, has ceased to come over, as can easily be detected when it fails to further sink to the under surface of the layer of water. The ethyl bromide so obtained will amount to about 20 ounces, and should be shaken with a solution of potassic bicarbonate, subse¬ quently washed with water, and purified by redistillation, as described below. The chemistry of this process is quite plain, the sul¬ phuric acid forming acid potassium sulphate, the bromine taking the place of the oxygen in the ethyl oxide, forming water with the hydrogen present, which expressed in symbols would read as follows : — KBr + H2S04 + C2H60 = KHS04 + H.,0 -1- C.2H5Br. The operation is in itself so simple, so rapid, and so totally devoid of all danger, that its advantages over the earlier ones are readily obvious. It can easily be con¬ ducted on the laboratory table of most any pharmacy, and will yield a product which possesses all the character¬ istics as described above. Its cost is an item of the greatest importance to the pharmacist, in view of the very high price asked for it at one time, and perhaps yet. The potassic bromide at 68, the sulphuric acid at 15, and the alcohol at 30 cents, will make the expense for material per pound only 90 cents, while any young man can make this amount in two hours’ time, besides attending to his various other duties, and it will enable him to emancipate himself from the manufacturing chemist, adding by it to his self- esteem and the elevation of his profession. But when larger quantities are required, and when it is a matter of importance to reduce the price as much as possible, I have found it to advantage to deviate from the above process, which, however, to the pharmacist may prove most suitable for its preparation on a small scale. As the first step in the manufacture of potassic bromide is that of ferrous bromide, I made use of the latter at once to obtain the desired ethyl in the following manner: — In a stone jug containing about 1 gallon of water and 2^ pounds of iron turnings or wire, 5 pounds of bromine are gradually added, care being taken not to allow the temperature to rise too high, the jug besides being placed in cold or iced water, and as soon as the reaction has ceased the solution of the green ferrous bromide is filtered off, the remaining iron being well washed out with warm or boiling water, and to it, in a leaden or glass flask (I have found the acid globe of a carboy a most useful vessel), 15 pounds of commercial sulphuric acid are added; after the mixture has sufficiently cooled, 6 pints of alcohol (95 per cent.) are intermixed, the mixture well agitated and distilled at a temperature as in the before-mentioned operation. I have in this way obtained from these amounts 7 pounds ethyl bromide at a cost of material of not over 4’30 dollars, or about 60 cents per pound. Again, in this reaction the chemistry is quite simple, the sulphuric acid uniting with the iron to form ferrous sulphate, while the two bromine again take the place of two oxygen in the two ethyl oxide, the four hydrogen with the two oxygen of the ethyl oxide forming two water, and may be expressed in symbols as follows : — - FeBr2 + 2C2H60 + H2S04 = FeS04 + 2HsO + 2C2H5Br. Although the ethyl bromide thus obtained is by far purer and has less odour than most of the articles found in the market, I have observed that, on evaporating a quantity of it, it left a heavy acrid odour behind which in anaesthesia was bound to prove objectionable if not actually deleterious, and I concluded, therefore, that, after washing, I would re-distill it at a low temperature, which I effected by placing it in a gallon bottle contained in a water-bath, and connected with a condenser. The bath was heated to a temperature of not over 125° E., at which brisk ebullition ensued, and a stream of pure ethyl bromide was received, which was devoid of any and all disagreeable odour, colourless and limpid, of a specific gravity of 1’40, boiled at 106° F., and dicl not burn. The remains in the bottle were about one-half ounce of a brown acrid liquid, of which I have not yet re¬ covered a sufficient amount to make a more complete examination. To the taste it is extremely unpleasant, pungent, and representing the disagreeable odour gene¬ rally found in the ethyl bromide offered in the market. As regards the stability of pure ethyl bromide, which has been questioned, I can fully confirm Dr. Levis’s ex¬ perience. I have kept samples of my earlier experiment-), made almost two months ago, which to-day present the same appearance they had then ; and far from a spontaneous decomposition, I have not succeeded, by either alkalies or acids, or other chemical means, to liberate the bromine from this ethyl, or to effect its exchange in double de¬ composition,* and cannot say, therefore, that it deserves the name of a loosely molecular article. (Dr. Squibb, Medical Record , April 3, 1880, p. 379.) In concluding my remarks on its manufacture, I would point out the simple and cheap manner in which, by my process, a pure and reliable article (which already has been thoroughly tested by many physicians) can be pro¬ duced by the pharmacist himself, without having to submit to the exorbitant prices generally asked for it. Actuated by a desire to, further study the effects of the ethyl bromide, I was led to make a series of experiments on the lower animals and on ourselves, conjointly with my friend Dr. J. Gr. Lee, the physician to the coroner of this city. Regarding the safety of it as an anaesthetic, as well as to after effects produced by its use, we made numerous investigations, the results of some of which I will give condensed below. As an article from the pen of Dr. J. Marion Sims seems to indicate that a most disastrous result has recently occurred from its use ( Medical Record, April 3, 1880, p. 361), and that being the only and first instance of the kind reported, the ethyl bromide used in that case, as well as the most of it produced heretofore, was presumably obtained in a very imperfect manner, and it seems but reasonable to review the case. That death occurred only twenty-one hours after the use of the anaesthetic seems to imply that it was not its immediate presence which caused this lethal effect. The presence of an odour of ethyl bromide forty-one hours after its administration is hardly in conformity with its volatile chai'acter, but s e ns to point to the presence of some heavier and less diffusible substance contained therein. Judging from these facts that the deleterious effects might be due to the heavy distillate above mentioned, we gave 20 drops of it to a rabbit, with the result of causing gastro- intestinal irritation, general malaise, and subsequent death in eighteen hours afterwards; while, in the same animal, 30 drops of pure ethyl bromide, given on a previous occasion, produced no worse effects than slight intoxication. A post-mortem examination showed the decided odour of the acrid heavy distillate pervading the intestinal tract and kidneys, while the brain, which unfortunately in the autopsy of Dr. Sims’s case has not been mentioned, pre- * I have since observed a reaction with a strong solution ammonia, yielding ethylamine bromide. July 3, 18S0.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 5 sented a congested appearance, explaining probably the cerebral trouble which Dr. Sims’s patient complained of so much. This congestion is totally absent in immediate death produced by the anaesthetic on animals, the brain in such contingencies being generally pale and somewhat anemic. The abdominal viscera also showed signs of irritation and congestion. To further satisfy ourselves as to the effects of pure ethyl bromide, we continued our experiments as fol¬ lows : — A rabbit of 4 pounds 3 ounces weight ; anaesthesia in¬ duced in one minute by 20 drops of ethyl bromide ; pupils first contracted, and then dilated ; heart acting well, with slight increase in number of beats. By with drawing and reapplying the anaesthetic as required, the animal was kept under the effects of it for twenty minutes, and on withdrawing it the animal recovered entirely in five minutes. Another rabbit, weighing 3£ pounds, was made to inhale 1 drachm of ethyl bromide, producing complete anaesthesia in one minute, causing first contraction, followed by dilatation of the pupil; heart beating normally ; voluntary muscles relaxed. The anaesthesia being pushed on by the use of another drachm of the ethyl, the beating of the heart was accelerated, number of respirations increased, and in six minutes heart ceased to beat, after losing perceptibly in impulse. Attempts at resuscitation proved fruitless, but electromotoric sensi¬ bility well preserved. Post-mortem examination showed the brain in a state of anemia, lungs pale and healthy, right ventricle and auricle distended, and filled with ante¬ mortem clots; no odour of the ethyl perceptible after death. The above experiments demonstrate that with the cautious use of ethyl bromide, rabbits, which are with difficulty maintained in anaesthesia, can be successfully ethylized without much danger to their lives. Satisfied as to this, we were determined to obtain in¬ formation as to its action when administered internally, and for that purpose gave to three of the animals re¬ spectively 10, 20 and 30 minims of the eth>l. While producing in the larger doses more markedly a slight intoxication, no other serious symptoms arose. Encouraged by this, we commenced taking it ourselves, well diluted, first in doses of 5 and 10, and then 25 and 30 drops, without discovering any noticeable effect, save that of slight sleepiness induced by the larger doses. A nervous headache, existing during these experiments, seems by the ethyl to have been entirely relieved, which, however, might have been the case had any other bromide been taken instead. That it may prove of decided benefit in nervous irritation and hysteria is readily to be inferred herefrom. To the taste it is sweet and pleasant, but heating to. the mucous surfaces, and it should be well diluted before it is administered. The next case for experiment was that of a rabbit, which we injected hypodermically with 5 minims of the ethyl, producing, however, no marked effect, save a very slight intoxication. Another, subsequently injected with 10, 15 to another, and 30 to still another, had again the effect of producing intoxication, with a decided somnolence and relaxation of the muscles, all of the animals recover¬ ing, however, completely within one hour. As a com¬ parative experiment, another rabbit was injected with 15 minims of chloroform, which produced most marked and threatening effects and complete somnolence, from which the animal could not be roused, and only recovered after three hours, remaining for hours afterwards in a stupefied condition. It is to be remarked here, that in all cases where the animals were injected with ethyl bromide the number of respirations were largely increased. Determined to ascertain the manner in which the ethyl bromide should prove fatal if injected hypodermically, we injected into one of them, a healthy female rabbit of 5 pounds weight, within half an hour, in broken quantities, 2^ drachms of the article, failing, however, to inflict death, nor more serious symptoms within the next three hours than those above noted ; found, however, that the animal had expired during the following night. A post-mortem examination revealed a congested brain, but showed nothing beyond that to account for its death. The inference from these experiments may be set down that, internally as well as hopodermically, the ethyl bromide has no toxic effect on the animal organism beyond that of ether or alcohol. The absence of any odour of it in intestines, kidneys and liver, admits the theory that it is totally eliminated through the lungs ; that by its presence in large quan¬ tities in the system, and if not readily eliminated through the lungs, it acts as a decided stimulant, and may, when used in excess, like ether and alcohol, cause death by cerebral congestion. Finally, and with a view to test its adaptability and safety as an anaesthetic in comparison with ether and chloroform, we experimented on three healthy rabbits of about the same weight, simultaneously administering by inhalation to one ether, ethyl bromide to another, and chloroform to the third, sufficient being used to maintain profound anaesthesia. The first one, under ether, was completely under its effect in one minute ; heart’s action rapidly increased in number of beats, diminished in impulse, death occurring in three minutes. The second one was in complete anaesthesia from ethyl bromide in thirty seconds; pupils first contracted then dilated; muscles relaxed; accelerated action of heart, gradually failing impulse ; death in seven minutes. Third rabbit received chloroform, producing rapidly anaesthesia in fifty seconds ; heart feeble ; at the expira¬ tion of one minute fifty seconds heart suddenly ceased to beat. Post-mortem appearance showed the animal killed by ether presenting congested membranes and investments of braiD, heart " apparently arrested in diastole, clot in right auricle and ventricle, which were largely distended ; odour of ether thought to be faintly perceptible on opening abdominal cavity ; post-mortem hypostasis well marked in lungs. Rabbit died of ethyl bromide presented on post-mortem examination a brain somewhat paler than normal, clots in both ventricles and auricles of heart ; death apparently from over-stimulation of this organ; lungs normal; no odour of the ethyl perceptible in viscera. Chloroformed animal showed on post-mortem examina tion an anemic brain, small clots in right auricle and ventricle, heart apparently arrested in incomplete systole, due to clot ; lungs markedly congested ; no odour of chloroform noticeable. The inferences from these cases seem to impress us as follows : — The first and second rabbits, which had been treated respectively with ether and with ethyl bromide, died under similar circumstances. The modes of death appear to have been occasioned by a gradual paralysis of the cardiac inhibitory motor centres, while the sudden heart failure in the third, which is typical of chloroform accidents, seems to indicate paralysis of the cardiac motor centres. While it is hardly justifiable to infer from experiment i on animals as to the effect on the human organism, it is not to be denied that they go far, along with the many trials on human beings and those upon oui'selves, to show that a direct toxic influence from pure ethyl bromide on the organism need not be apprehended. That pure ethyl bromide is per se an absolutely safe anaesthetic can as yet not be positively stated, but that its action appears to be quite as safe as ether, and certainly more so than the treacherous and dangerous chloroform, seems to us, as deduction from above-related experiments, out of questiom 6 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [July 3, 1880. We can certainly hail this new-comer as another agent destined to alleviate sufferings, which, by its own merits, will win its way into the ranks of those we now hold as recognized measures for combating disease, and as such, propose that by this body it be recommended for a position in the National Pharmacopoeia about to be revised. THE BITTER PRINCIPLE AND RESIN OF HOPS.* BY DR. MAX ISSLEIB. The nature of the bitter principle, as well as of the other constituents of hops, has already several times been the subject of investigation. These investigations, at least in respect to the bitter principle, have hitherto led to no satisfactory results. Etti,+ in his memoir upon the tannic acid of hops, at the close mentions also the bitter principle, which accord¬ ing to him can be obtained in the following manner. The hops are extracted with ether, when there pass into solution essential oil, chlorophyll, and a crystalline white and an amorphous bi'own resin. Of these the white resin alone remains undissolved when the evaporation residue of the ethereal solution is treated with alcohol. The resin that is dissolved in the alcohol is separated from the bitter substance adhering to it by the addition of water to the alcoholic solution. Prom the turbid liquid, which is not rendered clear by filtration, the resin separates, whilst the bitter substance remains in watery solution. If this solu¬ tion be evaporated in a vacuum over sulphuric acid it yields well-formed colourless crystals ; but if it be evapo¬ rated in a water-bath only small crystals are formed in an extract-like mass. The crystals, as well as the syrup, have a strong bitter taste, and are completely soluble in water, especially when warmed. According to this author it is possible, by repeated re-dissolving and re-precipitation, to separate the resin and bitter substance so completely that the resin no longer tastes bitter. He says further, “These experiments, which can easily be controlled, are contrary to the frequently expressed opinion that the bitter resin of hops is only brought into watery solation by the help of sugar, tannic acid, gum, essential oil, etc. The brown amorphous resin and the bitter substance of hops are two essentially different substances.” A repetition of this investigation appeared to me to be indicated because of the want of more exact information respecting the crystalline hop-bitter so obtained. The best Bohemian hops were exhausted with ether. After removal of the ether there remained a greenish- black aromatic resin-like extractive residue. Of this the greater part was dissolved by alcohol and there were left behind white indistinctly crystalline flocks, which were identical with the white crystalline resin of Etti. These flocks, collected on a filter, appeared as a voluminous greenish-coloured residue. This residue was dissolved in ether and repeatedly recrystallized ; it was not, however, completely freed from the adhering green colouring matter. •* The alcoholic solution of the ethereal hop extract was mixed with half its volume of water. It became at once milky turbid, and after standing the greater part of the resin it contained separated as a brown amorphous mass. This separated resin was re-dissolved five times in alcohol and precipitated with water. The united aqueous liquids did not become clear by filtration. When carefully con¬ centrated on a water-bath there was a separation of a considerable quantity of resin still suspended in it. Crystals were not obtained after the concentrated liquid had been evaporated in a vacuum over sulphuric acid to a syrupy consistence, neither when, as directed by Etti, the syrup had been re-dissolved in alcohol and again separated. Moreover the syrup did not taste like a pure * Communication from the Laboratory of E. Reichardt. From 1 lie Archiv der Pharrnacie for May. t Dingl. Polyt. Jo-urn 1876, 228. bitter, but strongly acid, nauseous, and afterwards bitter. Further, the alcoholic solution of the resin that had been five times precipitated by water still had a strong bitter taste. These results consequently do not correspond completely with those obtained by Etti. The previous investigations on the preparation of the hop bitter, so far as the literature is accessible to me, are as follows : — Ives* first called attention to the presence in hops of a yellow powder, resembling vegetable cells, which occurs on the inner base of the scaly bracts of the hop strobile. It also forms on the young leaves when just bursting, but it falls off from them as they grow older. Ives named these granules “ lupulin,” and he obtained from dried hops that had been rubbed together in a sack, nearly one-sixth of their weight of this substance. According to his analysis lupulin contained in 100 parts : — Tannin . 5 parts. Extract insoluble in alcohol . . 10 „ Peculiar bitter substance, soluble in water and in alcohol . . . 11 „ Wax . 12 „ Resin . 36 „ Insoluble ligneous residue ... 46 „ Essential oil was not detected in lupulin by Ives. The substance named wax was soluble only in ether and alkaline liquids. The hop bitter dissolved more easily in hot water than in cold. According to Ives when hops are completely deprived of lupulin they no longer contain any of the peculiar bitter. He therefore proposed that lupulin should be used in the place of hops in medicine and brewing. In 1826, Pelletier, Payen and Chevallier,+ who had previously written on the same subject, J published their renewed comprehensive investigation upon the constitu¬ ents of hops. They extended their investigations both to the herbaceous and woody portions of the hop plant, and to the yellow hop glands. According to them the herbaceous portion and the stem contain the same con¬ stituents if carefully freed from lupulin. They impart no bitterness to water, but a disagreeable astringent taste, and a smell resembling that of ordinary vegetable infu¬ sions. In the watery extract a series of organic and inorganic salts were detected, which need not be further referred to here. In the yellow secretion, on the other hand, an abund¬ ance of bitter substance was found. The quantity of hop glands amounted to 13 per cent, of the hops; of this, however, 4 per cent, was sand, so that there was left 9 per cent, of pure yellow secretion that floated upon water. From these pure hop glands they obtained 2 per cent, of a white volatile persistently acrid tasting oil, which was assumed to contain sulphur, since polished silver was blackened by water with which the oil had been in contact. Infusion of hop glands, prepared with heat, has an aromatic bitter taste, and contains essential oil, resin, some fatty matter, organic and inorganic salts, and a peculiar bitter substance, which these authors on their part named “ lupulin.” They described this bitter sub¬ stance as yellowish white, drawing moisture from the air, and more soluble in warm water than in cold. The saturated aqueous solution frothed when shaken, had a neutral reaction, and was not altered by acids and alkalies. The bitter substance was prepared by treating the watery extract after addition of lime with alcohol, filtering off the alcohol and evaporating. The residue was exhausted with water, warmed, washed with ether, and carefully dried. The use of ether is unnecessary if the watery extract be repeatedly treated with alcohol and water. Further the hop glands contained, according to these authors 50 to 55 per cent of resin, soluble in alcohol and * American Journal of Science , vol. ii., p. 302. t Journal de Chim. med., 1826, vol. ii., p. 527. X Geiger’s Magazin, vol. xvii. July 3, 1880.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 7 ether, having an aromatic smell and taste, and burning with a smokeless flame. These investigations were very valuable, in the state of chemical science at that time. Now it is known that in the preparation of the bitter substance nothing should be used — in this case lime — which would induce its decom¬ position. Wagner* corrected the statement of Payen and Cheval- lier as to the presence of sulphur in hop oil. He obtained from hops 0’8 per cent, of a light brownish oil, having a strong smell of hops, a burning slightly bitter taste re¬ calling that of thyme and origanum, sp. gr. 0’908, and slightly acid reaction. In this oil Wagner was unable to detect sulphur and he came to the opinion that Payen and Chevallier had worked with sulphured hops. By frac¬ tional distillation the oil was separated into several parts. The portion passing over between 175° and 225° C. had the composition C10H18O, consequently differed only by H20 from the hydrocarbon C10H16. Upon mixing the hop oil with alcoholic solution of potash, it became brown, and in distillation a hydrocarbon, having the formula C10Hl6 and smelling like rosemary, passed over. From the behaviour of the oil with acid sulphite of ammonia, it giving no crystalline compound, it was considered not to be an aldehyde. Personnef made further experiments upon lupulin. In distilling it with water an acid and a volatile oil passed over. The former proved to be valerianic acid, and the volatile oil was by treatment with nitric acid converted into valerianic acid and a resinous substance. Dropped upon fused potash the oil yielded a hydrocarbon C10H16, besides carbonate and valerianate of potash. Personne assumed, therefore, the presence in hop oil of a hydro¬ carbon, C10H16, and valerol, C10H12Oo. Personne found also in hop oil an organic acid and a bitter nitrogenous substance, neither of which was more closely examined. LermerJ renewed the investigation of the hop bitter. His comprehensive communication mentions of former work only that of Ives. Lermer exhausted hops repeatedly with ether. From the ethereal extract there separated after standing a considerable quantity of a crystalline body, which according to him was myricin. It was easily obtained perfectly white through washing with cold alco¬ hol and recrystallization from hot alcohol. The alcohol solution filtered from the myricin was again distilled, the residue taken up with ether, and shaken repeatedly with strong potash solution until this was no longer coloured deep yellow. The resin, etc., passed principally into the lower watery potash layer ; in the upper was found the potash combination with the hop bitter, together with ad¬ herent resin. Upon shaking the deep brown ethereal layer it yielded the hop bitter alkali to the water. From the watery solution a copper compound of the hop bitter, soluble in ether, was precipitated by CuS04. Upon treating the ethereal solution of the copper salt with sulphuretted hydrogen and evaporating the filtrate in a current of car¬ bonic anhydride a brown residue was obtained, in which crystals quickly formed that were freed from adhering mother-liquor by nitrobenzol and spreading them on gyp¬ sum. The bitter substance so obtained was insoluble in water, but readily soluble in alcohol, ether, chloroform, carbon bisulphide, benzol, turpentine oil, and similar sol¬ vents. The crystals had an acid reaction ; the potash and copper salts were also acid. The formula of the copper salt, according to Lermer was Cu0,C32H2507. Lermer further mentions the occurrence of some other crystalline body in hops, which however was not more closely examined. The same objection which was raised against the in¬ vestigation of Payen and Chevallier must be repeated * Journal far practische Chemie, vol. lviii., 35L. f Journ. Pharm.y vol. xxvi., pp. 241, 321; vol. xxvii., p. 22, J Vierteljahrsschrift fur jpract. Pharmacie , vol. xii., p. 505. with greater emphasis against that of Lermer. The use of concentrated solution of potash in the preparation of undecomposed hop bitter has been proved by more recent Investigations upon the bitter substances inadmissible. If the properties of the bitter substances previously ob¬ tained from the hop be compared no slight differences are manifest. Whilst Ives only mentioned the occurrence in lupulin of a bitter substance which was soluble in water and alcohol, Payen and Chevallier described the. nature of the bitter substance named by them “lupulin” as soluble in water and alcohol, neutral and uncrystallizable, and not altered by acids or alkalies. Personne spoke of a bitter nitrogenous substance. Lermer prepared a bitter substance insoluble in water and soluble in ether, alcohol and similar solvents, having an acid reaction. The crys¬ talline bitter substance of Etti was soluble in water and alcohol, though he failed to give nearer information upon its special properties. These entirely divergent results have their basis in the use of imperfect methods. In the isolation of bitter substances in the present day their behaviour towards tannic acid, lead salts and ani¬ mal charcoal is utilized. Only a few are precipitated by tannic acid ; the bitter substance being withdrawn from the precipitate produced by means of alcohol, after the tannic acid has been com¬ bined by previous treatment of the precipitate with lead oxide. Acetate and subacetate of lead are suitable principally for the acid-reacting bitter substances. The bitter sub¬ stance lead precipitate, stirred in water, is decomposed with sulphuretted hydrogen ; the bitter substance is then found either in the watery solution or with the lead sulphide, which possesses the peculiarity of obstinately retaining many bitter substances. Frequently the watery extract is precipitated first with acetate of lead and then with subacetate, in order to ensure the separation of the pre- cipitable acids. Animal charcoal is advantageous in the preparation of both the neutral and the acid bitter substances. Hopf, Warington, Weppen and others observed the power of vegetable and animal charcoal to remove the bitter sub¬ stance from bitter vegetable extracts, and Lebourdois and Bley made practical use of the observation. Freshly burnt previously boiled granular animal charcoal is best suited for the purpose. The vegetable extract is treated with the charcoal either in the cold or with heat until the bitter is removed; the charcoal is then washed with cold water and gently dried. The bitter substance is with¬ drawn by means of boiling alcohol, and other substances going into solution must be removed by suitable reagents. The great advantage of this method is that it is not neces¬ sary to concentrate the voluminous vegetable extract, and easily occurring alterations are avoided. This method was also indicated in this case, because the bitter substance of hops is not isolated by tannic acid and lead salts. If an aqueous extract of hops prepared with heat be treated with tannic acid a plentiful precipitate generally results. This, however, is not a combination of the hop bitter with tannic acid, since if the precipitate be decomposed with lead and exhausted with alcohol, the alcohol leaves upon evapora¬ tion a dark brown coloured residue, which has a very disagreeable astringent, but only slightly bitter taste. A very considerable precipitate is also produced in extract of hops or of lupulin by lead acetate and subacetate ; but after decomposition by means of sulphuretted hydrogen there remains after the evaporation of the watery solution a body similar to that obtained with tannic acid. If the lead sulphide be exhausted with boiling absolute alcohol there remains upon evaporation of the alcohol generally some slightly yellowish coloured crystals, which consist of sulphur derived from the decomposed sulphuretted hy¬ drogen. Before I refer to the experiments which led to the decision as to the best means of extraction and the most 8 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [July S, 1S80. suitable method of isolating the bitter substance, it will be as well to define the term “ bitter substance ” some¬ what more precisely. At preseut this name is applied to a class of bodies very widely spread through the vegetable kingdom, but also occurring in the animal kingdom, which almost always by boiling with acids or alkalies, sometimes also under the influence of ferments, by the taking up of water, break up into sugar or a body resembling it, and another decomposition product. They belong therefore, mostly, to the large group of glucosides. These are taken as ethers of the sugars or sugar- like compounds ; most of them taste bitter or astringent and have a neutral or slightly acid re¬ action. Besides carbon, hydrogen and oxygen, a few con¬ tain nitrogen, and only myronic acid contains sulphur also. From the alkaloids, allied to them by their bitter taste, they are distinguished by the reaction, the almost constant absence of nitrogen and their less powerful action upon the organism. Only picrotoxin, helleborin, digitalin, antiarin and colchicin are exceptions. Those families of plants that are rich in alkaloids, — for instance, papaveracese and solanaceae, — are poor in bitter substances, it is interesting that it is possible still further to split up one of the two original decomposition products, as is the case with phloridzin and salicin. A scientific arrangement of the glucosides is at present not yet possible. Kromayer divided them according to the difference in their taste into two great divisions, the bitter substances and the acrid tasting substances. Each of these has vaiious subdivisions. Scholemmer^ attempted the division of glucosides into the fatty series, — containing at present only myronic acid, — and the aromatic series. From the latter he separates the tannic acids by their behaviour towards salts of iron and albumen solution. Marquardt divided the bitter substances into — A. Picroglucosides, yielding sugar or some other sac¬ charine body upon decomposition. B. Pure picrides, yielding no saccharine body to the action of acids, Both these classes are again split up into — (1) Chromogens, (2) Ozogens, (3) Retinogens, according as they yield upon treatment colouring matter, odorous matter (essential oil, etc.), or resin. Preparation of the Hop Bitter. — In order to make clear the best means of extracting the bitter substance from the hop, experiments were made with different solvents. Behaviour of Lupulin and Hops towards Cold Water. — Hops were exhausted by extracting them four or five times with cold distilled water ; a strongly bitter tasting, aromatic smelling yellowish liquid was cbt lined. When lupulin was rubbed as fine as possible — which c msed it to agglutinate together very much and thereby to present resistance to the penetration of the water — a liquid was obtained by similar treatment, which manifested the bitter taste and aromatic odour in a higher degree than that obtained from the hop. The complete exhaustion of the lupulin is only effected with difficulty on account of its resinous nature. Upon the evaporation of the liquids so obtained there remained a small quantity of light- brown extract, which tasted strongly bitter, but herba¬ ceous also. Behaviour of Lupulin and Hops towards Warm Water. — Upon pouring boiling water upon lupulin and hops strongly coloured extracts were obtained. They tasted bitter, but were also disagreeable and astringent. They left upon evaporation a considerable quantity of brown extract. Behaviour of Lupulin and Hops towards Alcohol. — 10 grams of hops exhausted with 85 per cent, spirit yielded a brown bitter tasting filtrate, which upon evaporating left 2-67 grams = 267 per cent, of resin¬ like extract. 10 grams of lupulin were submitted to * * History of the Carbon Compounds.’ similar treatment ; the filtrate was deep brown, tasted bitter and left 5 '53 grams, or 55*3 per cent, of extract. According to the statement of Etti and my own observations alcohol dissolves only the brown resin of hops. In order to determine the identity of the resins obtained from the hops and from lupulin, they were both purified with water from adhering extractive matter. The elementary analysis of this resin will be given subsequently. The resin dissolved with difficulty in benzine and light petroleum spirit, but readily in ether, alcohol and chloroform. The hop resin is precipitated from alcoholic solution by subacetate of lead, barium and calcium hydrates. The hydrates of sodium and potassium convert the resin into a resin-soap soluble in water. Behaviour of Lupulin and Hops towards Ether. — The ethereal extracts of lupulin and hops are green coloured, appear red in transmitted light, and leave upon evaporation of the ether a blackish-green resinous residue that does not impart a bitter taste to water. From these experiments it appears that the bitter taste both of hops and lupulin can be entirely removed by cold distilled water. The pure bitter aromatic taste of the cold extract, as compared with the bitter disagreeable herbaceous taste of the hot, the lighter colour and the smaller quantity of the cold extract, were advantages that tell in favour of cold water as the means of extraction of the bitter substance. Further experiments showed that the cold extracts of hops and lupuliu can be almost completely deprived of bitter taste by freshly burnt animal charcoal. A larger quantity of hops was therefore placed in a roomy extrac¬ tion cylinder, with a sieve bottom, and exhausted as rapidly as possible with cold distilled water. The extracts obtained being left in contact with freshly burnt animal charcoal in closed vessels had after two days lost their bitter taste. The charcoal was afterwards washed with cold water and gently dried, and then exhausted with boiling 90 per cent, alcohol as long as the latter was coloured by it. From the wine-yellow strongly bitter¬ tasting extract most of the alcohol was removed by distillation. The residuary liquid became turbid, but again cleared upon further evaporation, a brownish- black resinous body separating from the reddish-yellow liquid. Indeed it was by the separation of this — as subsequent elementary analysis demonstrated — brown amorphous resin that the clearing of the watery extract was effected, it not being filtered, but only decanted, so that finely divided resin in the extract is capable of being absorbed by the charcoal. The reddish-yellow watery liquid from which the resin had separated tasted very strongly bitter; never¬ theless this was followed by a disagreeable astringencjr. It was evidently a solution of the pure bitter sub¬ stance, or the pure substance must have been contained in it. Carefully brought to the consistence of a syrup upon a water-bath it became turbid, and upon further concentration there was a separation of dark flocks and it did not again dissolve clear in water. From this be¬ haviour it became probable that besides the bitter substance another body was present. A separation of this body by various solvents was attempted, but frus¬ trated by their equal solubility in water, alcohol, choloform benzin and petroleum spirit. But upon shaking, the aqueous solution of the bitter tasting extract with ether this takes up the bitter substance alone, whilst the other body being insoluble in ether remains in the aqueous solution. The ether is faintly I yellow coloured, and upon its removal there remains usually a very small quantity of an extraordinarily bitter strongly aromatic smelling body, whilst the watery solu¬ tion of the extract which has been shaken with ether possesses only an insipid disagreeable taste. The very small amount of bitter substance obtained from the hops amounted to O’OOI per cent., which in¬ duced me to submit lupulin to the same treatment. The July 3, 1S80.J THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 9 lupulin was obtained in Bonn ; it was of a yellowish- green colour and very aromatic smell, and left upon in¬ cineration 19*8 per cent, of residue, which is probably not to be looked upon as an adulteration, since in the collection of lupulin an admixture of sand, etc., from the hop field is hardly to be avoided. The lupulin was rubbed as fine as possible, which caused it to agglutinate together. As in this condition it could not be perfectly penetrated by water, it was mixed with three to four times its quantity of pure quartz sand that had been freed from soluble matter with acid. In other respects the process followed was as before. Five kilos of lupulin yielded 5*5 grams of bitter sub¬ stance, equal to 0T1 per cent., quite similar in its properties to that obtained from hops. The hop bitter is therefore present more abundantly in lupulin than in the whole hop ; which is a confirmation of the earlier statement of Payen and Chevallier that the bitter sub¬ stance of hops has its seat exclusively, or at least principally, in lupulin. Properties of the Pure Bitter Substance. — The bitter substance remains after the evaporation of the ether as a ight-yellow mass, of the thickness of an extract, which upon heating to over 60° C. assumes a reddish-yellow colour. If it be kept a longer time at this temperature it can be rubbed after cooling into a yellowish-white powder. In cold water the bitter substance when of a syrupy consistence is tolerably easily soluble ; but in the powder form it dissolves much more difficultly. When dissolving in warm water the bitter substance melts together to a resin- like mass, which rotates for a long time on the surface of the water ; it always becomes darker in colour and the latter portions are only very difficultly soluble. Alcohol, benzine, carbon bisulphide and ether dissolve the bitter substance readily; but all attempts to crys¬ tallize it from one of these solvents were without result. Evaporated during a week under the air pump there always remained an amorphous mass. The taste is a very intense pleasant bitter, recalling quinine ; the smell is very aromatic and resembling hops. Upon heating it to over 100° it puffs up and decomposes with evolution of a peculiar aromatic odour; and upon stronger heating it burns with a bright sooty flame, without leaving any ash. The bitter substance contains no nitrogen and has an extremely slight acid reaction. Concentrated sulphuric acid dissolves it with a black, and concentrated hydro¬ chloric acid and nitric acid with a yellow-brown colour. Upon treating a warmed aqueous solution with dilute acids it becomes turbid, giving off a strongly aromatic smell. Upon longer standing there separates at the bottom of the vessel a brown resin-like substance inso¬ luble in water. A decomposition of the hop bitter is consequently caused by dilute acids, but no sugar can be detected in the supernatant liquid. Alkalies dissolve the bitter substance with an intense yellow colour. Acetate and subacetate of lead and tannic acid produce turbidity in hop bitter solution, without a clear preci¬ pitation following. Ferrous and ferric salts produce no change of colour in a solution. The reagents for alkaloids, iodo-iodide of potassium solution, phosphomolybdic acid, phosphotungstic acid, platinic chloride, and mercuric chloride cause no precipitation. Elementary Analysis of the Hoy Bitter. — As the change of colour that takes place in tbe hop bitter when heated above 60° C. indicates the beginning of decomposition an elementary analysis was made of some that had been dried at this temperature until the weight remained constant. The combustion was made by means of cupric oxide in a current of oxygen gas. I. 0*2314 gram gave 0T703 H20 = 0*018922 H; and 0*5340 CO.,r= 0*145636 C. II. 0*2268 gram gave 01679 H>0 = 0*018955 H; and 0*5194 COo = 0 141654 C. III. 0*2204 gram gave 0*1670 H,0 = 0*018555 H ; and 0*5068 C02 = 0*138218 0. ’ I. C = 62*93 H = 8*17 O = 28*90 100*00 Found. II. III. 62*45 62*71 8*22 8*42 29*33 28*87 100*00 100*00 Calculated for ^•J9H460lO* 0 = 62*81 H = 8*31 O = 28*88 100*00 Decomposition of the Hop Bitter. — When a warm aqueous solution of hop bitter is mixed with twenty times diluted SO4H2 in great excess, it at once becomes very turbid. After standing twelve hours a resinous mass separates upon the bottom and sides of the vessel, whilst the supernatant liquid appears yellow coloured. The quantity of the separated insoluble body amounted in one case to 8*4, and in another to 8*7 per cent of the hop bitter used. The filtrate was as exactly as possible neutralized with Ba(OH)2, and after filtering off the BaS04 evaporated. After cooling the syrupy liquid solidified to a crystalline paste. The crystals contained a considerable quantity of baryta, but were neutral in reaction, a formation of a barium salt had therefore taken place. There was no indication of sugar. The insoluble resinous body produced by S04H., may be named “ lupuliretin,” and the acid formed simulta¬ neously, “lupulinic acid.” After purification of the lupuliretin from adhering sulphuric acid by careful washing with warm water it appears as a brownish-black aromatic-smelling resin-like body. Its chemical relations resemble those of hop resin ; it cannot be obtained crystalline from either alcoholic or ethereal solution. It gave on analyses results corre¬ sponding with the formula C10H16O4. Found. Calculated for c = I. II. C]0H 16^4. - 60*14 59*93 C = 60*00 H = = 7*85 8*29 H = 8*00 O = = 32*01 31*78 O = 32*00 . Lupulinate of barium is extremely soluble in water, dissolving equally in ether, alcohol, chloroform and water. It was not found possible to deprive it of its yellow colour by recrystallization from any of these solvents. Dried over calcium chloride until constant in weight and analysed it gave results corresponding with the formula C48H90BaO24. Found. Calculated for I. II. C48*l90^aO^4- C = 48*23 48*08 C = 48*53 H = 7*47 7*66 H = 7*58 Ba = 11*56 11*56 Ba = 11*54 O = 32*74 32*70 O = 32*35 When heated to 80° C. this salt lost five equivalents of water ; therefore C48H90BaO24 = C48H80BaO19 + 5HsO. Upon stronger heating it decomposed with evolution” of vapour having an acid reaction, and at a temperature of about 300° C. it burnt with an aromatic odour. Upon exactly neutralizing 0*3 gram of lupulinate of barium with sulphuric acid the concentrated filtrate left a faintly yellow-coloured crystalline bitter-tasting residue. Elementary Analysis of the Hoy Resin. — Resin obtained both from hops and lupulin was analysed. I. Found. Calculated for II. III. C10H14O3. C = 65*67 65*81 66*09 C = 65*93 H = 7*68 7*69 8*04 H = 7*68 O = 26*65 26*50 25*87 O = 26 39 Resin from Hope. From Lupulin. For the confirmation of the empirical formula C'ioH]403 for hop resin experiments were made in the preparation of compounds. It is necessary, however, to remember that these compounds of resins frequently do not show a constant composition. 10 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNA^ AND TRANSACTIONS. [July 3, 1880- Upon treating a spirituous solution of hop resin with subacetate of lead a voluminous precipitate appeared, which after careful washing and drying formed a greenish- yellow powder. Upon analysis it gave results corre¬ sponding with the formula C30H40PbO9 + 3 OH2. The composition found would probably be more correctly expressed by the formula — (C20H26PbO6 + C10H14O3) + 3 OH2. A barium compound was prepared by decomposing the soda soap of hop resin by means of baryta water. This gave results corresponding with the formula — ^20®-28-^a^6 d* C10H14O3) +70 H2. The calcium compound was obtained by decomposing the soda soap with lime water. It formed a greenish- grey powder and yielded results corresponding to the formula C20H26CaO6 + 6 OH2. Substance Insoluble in Ether. — As before stated there occurs in the spirituous extract from the animal charcoal besides the bitter substance a body that is insoluble in ether, whilst the bitter substance is dissolved by it. When this insoluble substance is dried and powdered it forms a red-brown hygroscopic powder, having a dis¬ agreeable smell and taste. Submitted to elementary analysis it gave results corresponding with the formula C10H]8O6. An aqueous solution treated with subacetate of lead yielded a voluminous yellowish -green precipitate, which after careful washing and drying was analysed and gave results corresponding with the formula C10H16PbO6. Conclusions. — From the results of the foregoing investi¬ gation it appears that there exists in hops and in lupulin a peculiar bitter substance. It is decomposed by acids, but as no sugar is yielded it must be placed among the pseudo-glucosides. The decomposition takes place accord¬ ing to the following equation : — ^ ^29^-46^10 ^ OH2 — C10Hl6O4 + C48H82Ol9. The lupuliretin obtained by the decomposition of the hop bitter is related to the resin and the essential oil. From hop resin it differs by H20. Cio^A + OH^CioHiA. Hop resin. Lupuliretin. It may be that hop resin is derived from the essential oil as follows : — Essential Oil Hop resin, of Hop. The substance insoluble in ether is a simple oxidation product of the hop oil ; thus : — ^10^-18^ + O5 = C'10^18^6* Essential Oil. Substance Inso¬ luble in Ether. The hop resin stands, however, in certain relation to the substance insoluble in ether, so that the assumption is permissible that in the oxidation of the essential oil of hop first resin is found, and afterwards, by further oxida¬ tion, the substance insoluble in ether, which is richer in hydrogen and oxygen. THE CONSTITUENTS OF JAPANESE BELLADONNA (SCOPOLIA JAPONICA).* Scopolia japonica, which is called by the Japanese rot6, or onishirikusa, or omisikusa, or omekikusa, or hashiridokoro (which last term is the most usual one), is a member of the natural family Solanaceae and is highly poisonous. Its root has been employed for a very long * Reprinted from New Remedies , June, 1880. time by Japanese physicians, and there can be no doubt that it possesses valuable therapeutic properties. The latter reside in two alkaloids, which were obtained in the following manner : — The dried root was powdered and several times extracted with alcohol, the alcohol was distilled off from the united tinctures, the residue dis¬ solved in water and filtered to remove the separated fat. The clear filtrate was now precipitated with solution of acetate of lead, the precipitate removed by filtration, the filtrate freed from excess of lead by sulphuretted hydro¬ gen, and after again filtering the solution concentrated, at a moderate heat, on a water-bath. The thin liquid residue was mixed with sulphuric acid, the mixture shaken with chloroform and the chloroformic solution separated. On evaporation, the latter left behind slender colourless needles which were contaminated with a yellow, smeary mass. The whole residue was boiled with water, the liquid (after cooling) was filtered, the filtrate concentrated on the water-bath at a low tem¬ perature and cautiously mixed with ammonia. This produced a white precipitate, which was collected on a filter, washed with a little water and then dissolved in alcohol, which, on evaporation, left behind colourless crystals. These had the characteristics of an alkaloid. Owing to the minute proportion in which this alkaloid exists in the root, the quantity obtained was insufficient for an accurate investigation of its properties and nature. A few drops of the aqueous solution of the sulphate of this alkaloid dropped into the eye of a rabbit produced dilatation of the pupil. I propose to name this alkaloid rotoine (from the Japanese name, rdt6), and reserve to myself its further study. The second alkaloid, which I term scopole'ine, exists in the root in larger proportion. It is obtained by adding an excess of soda solution to the acid liquid left after shaking with chloroform and by again shaking the now alkaline liquid with chloroform. The latter takes up the alkaloid and deposits it, on evaporation, in an impure condition, as a yellowish-brown, resinous mass. In order to purify it it was dissolved in dilute sulphuric acid and the solution carefully mixed with sodium car¬ bonate, as long as the precipitate was dirty and slimy. After filtering, a further quantity of sodium carbonate was added as long as a precipitate was formed. The latter was collected on a filter, washed and dissolved in chloroform. On evaporating the latter, the alkaloid was obtained as a yellowish, resinous mass, which, when perfectly dry, may be rubbed up to a yellowish-grey powder, possessing a great tendency to run together. I have been unable to obtain this alkaloid in a crystal¬ line condition or to form crystallized salts. It is diffi¬ cultly soluble in water, easily in acidulated water, also easily in chloroform and alcohol. All these solutions (except when supersaturated with acid) have a strong alkaline reaction. It yields precipitates with nearly all alkaloidal reagents. Regarding its effect on the animal organism, I can at present (July 22, 1878, at a meeting held in Tenkion, Yedo, Japan — Ed. N. R.) only say that it seems to act similarly to atropia. What relation it bears to the latter, however, I am not at present prepared to say, but hope to be soon able to give a fuller account of its com¬ position, products of decomposition and physiological effects. — Dr. A. Langgaard, from Mittheilungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Natur- und Volkerkunde Ost- Asiens, fol. Yokohama. No. 16 (December, 1878), p. 267. Note by Ed. N. R. — A short account of the root of Scopolia japonica and its uses, by Dr. G-. Martin, of Tokio, Japan, may be found in the Archiv der Pharmacie , December, 1878, p. 336. Dr. Martin states that it is called J apanese belladonna, but that its narcotic effects are much less marked than those of true belladonna. He says it contains solanine, but no atropine. The plant is further remarkable from the fact that it communicates to liquids a stronger fluorescence than any other known plant. . July 3, 1880]. THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 11 £be ijpbarnKucuttcal Journal - ♦ - SATURDAY , JULY 3, 1880. Communications for the Editorial department of this Journal , hooks for review , etc ., should he addressed to the Editor, 17, Bloomsbury Square. Instructions from Members and Associates respecting the ■ transmission of the Journal should he sent to Mr. Elias Bremridge, Secretary, 17, Bloomsbury Square, W.C. Advertisements, and payments for Copies of the Journal, Messrs. Churchill, New Burlington Street, London, W. Envelopes indorsed “ Pharm. JournJ THE AUTUMN SCIENTIFIC MEETINGS. Though it has not been until after the days had begun to shorten that we have been so fortunate as to enjoy weather that could fairly be called summer- like, the experience of the past week has been suffi¬ cient to bring to mind the fact that the excursion season is again coming round, and that before six weeks are over there will be special inducements for those whose business is more or less connected with scientific subjects to take part in some of the annual gatherings that have for their object the pro¬ motion of science and its applications as well as the increase of social intercourse between the cultivators of particular branches. The coming month of August will leave little to be desired in this respect if it be only possible to take advantage of all the opportunities to be presented. First in order of date there will be the meeting of the British Medical Association, to be held at ■Cambridge from the 10th to the 13th, under the presidency of Dr. G. M. Humphry, Professor of Anatomy in the University of Cambridge, and during which addresses upon Medicine, Surgery and Physiology will be delivered by Dr. J. B. Bradbury, Mr. Timothy Holmes and Professor Michael Foster. In addition to the usual business of the sections specially devoted to various subjects there is to be an exhibition of surgical instruments, microscopes, pharmaceutical preparations, dietetics and sanitary appliances, and excursions will be made to Ely, Peterborough and Audley End on Saturday, the 14th. After the lapse ot a week from that time will succeed the meeting of the British Pharmaceutical Conference at Swansea, commencing on Tuesday, the 24th, under the Presidency of Mr. William Southall, of Birmingham, and continuing during that day and the next for the reading of papers and transaction of general business. On the Thursday it is proposed to have a marine excursion in the bay, and if the weather is propitious this opportunity of seeing the fine coast scenery in the neighbourhood of Swansea will be a source of much enjoyment to lovers of the picturesque, while botanists and geolo¬ gists will no less meet with numerous objects of special interest to them. The extent and variety of the industrial enter¬ prise in the neighbourhood of Swansea cannot fail to furnish many attractions for those who visit the Conference, and we understand that arrangements are to be made for the members to inspect some of the most interesting manufacturing establishments. Last year the visitors of Sheffield enjoyed a great treat of this kind in going through the Bessemer Steel Works and the Electro-Plate Works that could scarcely be surpassed ; but when it is remembered that in the Swansea district there is another highly interesting steel-making process in operation, besides iron works, silver, nickel, cobalt and zinc refineries ; since, moreover, it is an important centre of copper ore smelting, of tin-plate making, and of “patent fuel ” manufacture, there is every reason to anticipate in this respect a result no less satisfactory than that experienced last year at Sheffield. Mr. James Hughes, the Local Secretary of the Swansea Committee, is, we understand, about to issue a circular to the members of the Conference offering to give information as to hotel and other accommo¬ dation for intending visitors, and in order that this may be secured satisfactorily it is desirable that early application should be made to him. As compared with some of the places that have been visited by the Conference, Swansea is but a small town, and though we do not doubt that good and ample accommodation will be found by all who attend the meeting, the fact that the British Association meeting will be held at the same time will naturally make this more difficult. In our re¬ port of the proceedings of the Executive Committee of the Conference last week it will have been noticed that from considerations of this kind it has become a standing question whether the advantages of hold¬ ing the Conference meeting at the same place and at the same time as the meeting of the British Associa¬ tion are not now more than counterbalanced by the attendant disadvantages of that plan. During the early years of the Conference it would scarcely have been possible to have a meeting other¬ wise than with the support of those who were mainly brought together by the attractions of the British Association ; in fact the Conference was then little more than incidental to the Association meeting. But now that it has attained a con¬ siderable degree of independent vitality it does not seem to be essential that the meetings should coincide. The attendance at the meetings is now much greater than it was originally, and, in a small town especially, this circumstance is likely to pro¬ duce some degree of inconvenience on both sides, if not actual antagonism, in the attempts to procure places of meeting and lodging accommodation. On the other hand, there is no doubt that to some members of the Conference the simultaneous meet¬ ings are a great convenience, as pointed out by Mr. Schacht, but we are disposed to think that the number of those influenced in this way is very small 12 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [July 3, 1880- as compared with aggregate of the visitors to the Conference. This argument in favour of continuing the previous practice seems moreover to he somewhat beside the real question to be considered. This year the meeting of the British Association is to be presided over by Professor Ramsay, the Director General of the Geological Survey, and the special features of interest will be lectures on Primeval Man, by Professor W. Boyd Dawkins ; on Mental Imagery, by Mr. F. Galton, and on the North-East Passage, by Mr. Henry Seebohm. REGISTRATION UNDER THE DENTAL ACT. At the recent meeting of the Medical Council a letter from the Honorary Secretary of the Dental Association was read, calling attention to an accompanying list of persons wrho have been registered in the Dentists’ Register upon their declaration that they were at the time of the passing of the Act “ in the bond fide practice of dentistry with pharmacy,” but whose names are not to be found in the Register of Chemists and Druggists for 1878, and who in an “ opinion” of counsel that had been obtained are consequently all liable to have their names struck off the Register. After consideration it was resolved that a reply should be sent that for the purpose of the removal of names from the Dentists’ Register it is necessary that evidence with respect to each name should be submitted to the General Council who will there¬ upon take such steps as it may see fit, in conformity with the provisions of the Act. This resolution is in accord with our expectation, as it has been expressed to correspondents that have consulted us upon the subject. A further indication of the course which the Medi- eal Council will be disposed to follow is given in its decision with respect to a case in which a person whose connection with pharmacy had been limited to assisting in a homoeopathic pharmacy and who had received a warning letter from the Dental Association because his name was not on the Register of Chemists and Druggists. He had now forwarded a certificate from a medical man that he had for three years been earning his living in the practice of dentistry in con¬ junction with the homoeopathic pharmacy, and asked that his declaration might be amended. The appli¬ cation was granted, and instructions were given that in future issues of the Dentists’ Register the words “with pharmacy” should be omitted after this person’s name. THE CONFERENCE TESTIMONIAL TO PROFESSOR ATTFIELD. It will be remembered that at the last meeting of the British Pharmaceutical Conference at Sheffield, it was resolved that under the circum¬ stances of Professor Attfield’s announced retire¬ ment from the post he now occupies, it is desirable to institute some permanent recognition of the invaluable services to the Conference rendered by him as its Senior General Honorary Secretary since its establishment sixteen years ago. An influential General Committee was formed last October for the purpose of taking the necessary measures to carry out this resolution. At its first meeting the General Committee appointed a small Executive Committee, consisting of Messrs. ScHACHTr Bender, Brady, T. Hyde Hills, R. Reynolds, M. Carteighe and Professor Redwood, to carry out the details of the scheme. As the subscription list will shortly close, sub¬ scribers who have not yet paid their subscriptions are invited to send the amount without delay. Sub¬ scriptions of any amount not exceeding 10s. 6 d. should be forwarded to the Honorary Secretary and Treasurer, Mr. Michael Carteighe, 180, New Bond Street, London, W. THE CATALOGUE OF THE SOCIETY’S LIBRARY. W e are requested by the Secretary to say that the new edition of the Catalogue of the Library of the Pharmaceutical Society is now ready, and that in accordance with the resolution passed by the Council a copy has been forwarded through the post to every Member and Associate in Business of the Societv. V Associates not in Business and Apprentices or Students of the Society will be supplied with copies of the Catalogue upon applying for them to the Secretary. It may further be mentioned that there are still some copies left of the recently published Index to ten volumes of this Journal, and that copies of this work also will be supplied to persons connected with the Society who have not yet received them,, upon their expressing a wish to that effect to the Secretary. SCHOOL OF PHARMACY STUDENTS’ ASSOCIATION. The last ordinary meeting of this session will be held on Thursday next, 8th inst. , at 8. 30 p.m. A Report on Organic Chemistry (postponed from the last meeting) will be made by the Secretary on “ The Relation between the Chemical Constitution of certain Organic Compounds and their Action upon the Ultra-Violet Rays.” A Report on Materia Medica will be made by Mr. R. H. Parker, on “Spurious Gums imported with Myrrh.” A Report on Inorganic Chemistry will be made by Mr C. H. Hutchinson, F.C.S., on “The Formula*- of some Inorganic Substances.” THE CHEMISTS’ ASSISTANTS’ ASSOCIATION. A special meeting of the above Association will be held at 32a, George Street, Hanover Square, on Wednesday next, July 7, when there will be an exhibit of microscopes and other objects of interest by its members. July 3, 18S0.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 13 |)robinaal Crmisarifons. LEEDS CHEMISTS’ ASSOCIATION. Tlie seventeenth annual meeting of this Association was held in the Library of the Association, at the Church Institute, on June 3, Mr. R. Reynolds in the chair. The Honorary Secretary presented the financial state¬ ment, which showed a balance in favour of the Associa¬ tion of £31 11s. 1 d. The number of members was reported as having fallen during the year from thirty-six to twenty -nine, and that of associates from twenty- six to twenty. The use made of the library and reading-room by some of the associates had been considerable, and the Committee would wish to see a more genei’al advantage taken of the valuable collection of books relating to chemistry, botany and pharmacy. The collection of materia medica specimens has been in rather frequent use by students. The lectures delivered during the year have not been numerous ; but the attendance has been more encouraging than in some previous sessions. The papers read on these occasions have been as fol¬ lows: — November 12, by Mr. J. Abbott, on “Ergot;” December 12, T. Eairley, Esq., F.C.S.E., “Glass, its Manufacture and Mode of Working;” February 11, Mr. E. O. Brown, on “Aerated Waters, and Simple Methods of Detecting Impurities therein;” March 10, Mr. Bothamley on “ Flame.” The following officers were elected for the current year: — President, Mr. Councillor T. B. Stead; Vice- President, Mr. S. Taylor; Treasurer, Mr. J. A. Hirst; Honorary Secretary, Mr. J. Heliowell ; Librarian, Mr. J. Exley ; other Members of Committee, Messrs. Abbott, Chadwick, Jefferson, R. Reynolds, Smeeton, Yewdall; Auditors, Messrs. G. Exley and F. Reynolds. The best thanks of the Association were tendered to Mr. J. Land, who has for many years acted as Treasurer. MEETING AT NOTTINGHAM. Thursday Half-Holiday Movement. At a general trade meeting of the chemists and drug¬ gists of Nottingham, held at the Flying Horse Hotel, on Wednesday, June 23, Mr. W. H. Parker in the chair, the following resolution was unanimously carried : — “ That in the opinion of this meeting it is desirable that the chemists should close their establishments on Thurs¬ day afternoon, and that the following gentlemen, Messrs. Fitzhugb, Rayner, W. H. Parker, C. Warriner, W. Widdowson, R. Widdowson, Humphreys, Oldershaw, Wilford and Normel be a Committee to strive to bring this object about.” roxecbmgs of Scientific Societies, SCHOOL OF PHARMACY STUDENTS’ ASSOCIATION. A meeting of this Association was held on Thursday, June 24, Professor Attfield, F.R.S., in the chair. Mr. W. A. H. Naylor, F.C.S., read a paper on “The Green Extracts of the Pharmacopoeia.” It is intended to publish a resume of this- paper in a future number. A discussion followed the reading of the paper, in which the President, Messrs. Parker, Arnold, Hooper, Postans, Hardwick, James and Wright joined. Mr. Holland said that he considered the taste which Mr. Naylor had referred to in ext. taraxaci is owing (assuming that it has been properly prepared) to the season in which the root has been collected. The extract prepared from roots gathered in September and October would be very different from that made from roots celleeted ia February. As regarded the preparation of the green extracts of hemlock, henbane, nightshade, etc., remember¬ ing the experiments which were made previously to the publication of the British Pharmacopoeia in 1864, and having taken part in a discussion on the subject shortly afterwards, Mr. Holland was sorry to find that Mr. Naylor had reopened the question in his paper as to whether or not it is prudent to discard the albumen from the finished extract. He had always considered the albumen au inert and valueless adjunct to the extract and although it might not very materially affect the keep¬ ing ojualities of the product, the quantity thrown down varied so much in different stages in the growth of the plants that it would be very unwise to allow it to be re¬ tained in the extract or rejected at the discretion of the manufacturer. Mr. Naylor had said that the syrup should be thick, and not thin, when the green matter is added. Mr. Holland thought that it was a matter of very little importance provided the temperature were kept low enough ; but he strongly urged that the liquor from the preparation, after being strained, as Mr. Naylor sug¬ gested, should be heated on a water-bath so that the green juice could never come in contact with the side of the pan where the heat is above 130° F. This must be the case if the juice were heated in a high pressure steam pan, which should in no case be employed until the green colouring matter had been separated. The proper time for collecting the plant for making into extracts was very accurately described in Squire’s ‘ Companion to the Phar¬ macopoeia,’ which was followed by Mr. Naylor in his paper. A vote of thanks was accorded to Mr. Naylor for his practical pharmaceutical paper. Mr. Stewart Hardwick then read the following paper upon “ Boracic Acid Ointment” : — Boracic Acid Ointment. BY STEWART HARDWICK. A short time ago a prescription for a lotion was given me to dispense, containing borax, carbonate of soda, glycerine and water. On mixing the ingredients there was evident decomposition with strong effervescence. Examination of the glycerine of borax of the Pharma¬ copoeia proved it to be strongly acid, and on treating borate of calcium with glycerine it dissolved, and on addition of carbonate of soda effervescence occurred. I am not at present in a position to say what this reaction is, but one result is the liberation of boracic acid.* Thus finding boracic acid to be soluble in glycerine, I endeavoured to prepare a solution that might be used to mix with a fatty base to form a perfectly smooth oint¬ ment ; but found, when the proportion of acid ordered is large, the quantity of glycerine required is greater than is desirable to introduce into an ointment. 1 then turned my attention to solidifying solutions of the acid in glycerine by means of gelatine and starch, and made preparations varying in strength from 2 to 1 drachm in the ounce. The latter, I believe, is quite as strong as the ointment usually employed. The form I used for the jelly is : — Gelatine . 15 gr. Water . 2 dr. Glycerine . 6 dr. Boracic Acid . . as much as is ordered. The gelatine is soaked in the water for two or three hours, and then added to the boracic acid dissolved in the glycerine by aid of a gentle heat. The water is necessary on account of the hygroscopic nature of the glycerine; but its addition reduces the solvent power of the mixture, consequently when made much stronger than 1 drachm in the ounce part of the acid crystallizes out. Glycerine jelly does not, however, form a good base. * An explanation of this reaction was given in a paper read before the Students’ Association by Dr. Senier and Mr. Lowe, in April, 1878; See Pharm. Journ., [3], viii., p. 819.— ED; Ph. j* 14 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [July 3, 1S80. A far better preparation is made by use of starch, which might be named glycerine of boracic acid. The form for its preparation is : — Starch . 1 drachm. Glycerine . 1 ounce. Boracic Acid . . as much as is ordered. Dissolve the acid in the glycerine, add the starch, and heat to the boiling point. When made a drachm in an ounce this preparation leaves nothing to be desired ; the base is of good consistence, the active ingredient is in a state of perfect solution, and on that account may be expected to have a quick and effective action. When made 2 drachms to the ounce a small part of the acid separates out in microscopic crystals ; but even then the state of division is far greater than can be obtained by trituration. When it is desired to incorporate boracic acid with lard or other fatty base, the addition of a few drops of glycerine (about 20 minims to a drachm) materially facilitates its pulverization. After a discussion, a vote of thanks was passed to Mr. Hardwick. SOCIETY OF ARTS. The Chemistry of Bread-Making.* BY PROFESSOR GRAHAM, D.SC. {Continued from page 1051, Vol. X.) Lecture III. The albuminoids in cereals may be very conveniently divided into two chief categories, those which are soluble in water, and those which are, at least at first, not soluble. Those whioh are insoluble consist of glutin and fibrin. Glutin differs from.fibrin, inasmuch as it is slightly soluble in cold water — more so in hot water ; but that which distinguishes it from fibrin is that it dissolves in spirit of wine, whereas the other material, fibrin, which constitutes 71 per cent, of crude gluten, does not. There are yet other forms of albuminoids, but these are soluble in water. They consist of albumen, which, of course, is soluble in water. It is precipitated by strong alcohol and by boiling, and differs therefore from the next member, legu- min, which resembles albumen in every other respect, except that on boiling it is not precipitated. Lastly, there is a form of soluble albuminoid matter, contained more especially in the husk or skin of the berry of the wheat, which has been called cerealin. This is a very active diastasic ferment, and resembles to a great extent the peculiar diastasic ferment which is obtained from malting barley, and infusing the result of that malting. These three varieties of albuminoids are found, one or more of them, more or less in all seeds, and for this reason. You remember I pointed out to you the nature of the caryopsis of barley, and I compared that with the rich, thick, fleshy cotyledons of the bean and pea, and I said that when you considered the bean and pea or the cary¬ opsis of the barley and wheat, we have in either case a mass of matter stored up by the parent plant for the future nourishment of the young embryo lying at the bottom in both cases. Now, the function played by these soluble albuminoids is to convert the insoluble cellulose matter, the woody fibre, and after that has been to a great extent used up, then to attack the starch, the amylaceous matter, in the grain or in the seed, and convert it into soluble nourishment for the young growing embryo. The amount of soluble albuminoids we shall presently see, in well-matured and well-gar¬ nered grain, is not large, whereas, in ill-matured grain, and still more, of course, in sprouted grain, the amount of these albuminoid ferments is considerable. I shall call your attention now to a very interesting * Cantor Lectures : Delivered November and December, 1879. Reprinted from the Journal of the Society of Arts. experiment, because we shall find that it has a consider¬ able bearing upon the very ingenious process of fermenta¬ tion that bakers have discovered for themselves. If we take yeast, which is a powerful and active ferment when added to dextro or lievo-glucose, or maltose sugar, and add it to the unbroken starch cells, we shall find that, even after an hour in the cold, there is comparatively little action ; whereas if we add to that yeast, and that unbroken starch— ordinary starch before it is boiled, and while the cells are not burst — a small quantity of the cold water infusion of any of the cereals, we shall find that, inasmuch as that cold water infusion contains soluble albuminoids, these are acted upon by the yeast, and are converted from their complex molecular structure into bodies of less com¬ plexity in their structure. In other words, they are less colloidal or gummy ; they are more mobile. That peculiar molecular disturbance having been brought about, among the soluble albuminoid bodies in the cold water infusion of any of the cereals, by the peculiar action of yeast, these degraded albuminoids have the power of passing through the lining of the starch cell, and in that way the hydration of the starch is brought about, so that maltose sugar and dextrin of the various kinds I have told you about are formed ; whereas, if we do not make use of these soluble albuminoids obtained from a cold water infusion of one of the cereals, if we take starch itself unboiled, we shall find that yeast has, in the same time, comparativelylittle action. Now, that is a matter of considerable interest, and we shall find that the baker has acquired all that knowledge practically long ago. I am only pointing it out to you now on account of its scientific interest. Mr. Lewis has, in one tube, some water, unbroken starch cells and yeast ; in the other, in addition to the yeast and starch, he has added a small quantity of cold aqueous infusion of flour. These two tubes have stood one hour, and on testing a filtered portion of each, you will find that, whereas the* yeast and starch alone have no action, or but little, on. Fehling’s solution when boiled with it, that in the other case, where a little cold infusion of flour was added, the Fehling’s solution will show considerable reduction, proving that sugars have been formed by the intervention of the soluble albuminoids of flour. We may gather, then, from this that the yeast cell is itself unable to pierce the starch cell, and that the action brought about by the yeast is indirect ; by first of all degrading the form of the soluble albuminoids, and then causing them to ooze through the sac or wall of the starch cell. The tendency of all albuminoids, even those which are insoluble in water, and even that which is the most complex in its structure, namely, fibrin, is to degrade, to become less and less complex, and ultimately, of course, to become soluble in water. The degradation of molecu¬ lar structure is communicated to the complex molecular structure of starch, so that the complexity of starch undergoing the peculiar degrading action which goes on in the albuminoid molecule is itself converted into mole¬ cules less complex than starch, namely, into maltose and dextrin ; in some cases there may be also the production of other sugars. We see then, that the albuminoids are powerful degraders, or breakers down of the complexity of molecular structures. But that is not the only interesting point connected with nitrogen. Curiously enough, we speak of nitrogen as being inert, and as being merely used for the purpose of diluting the oxygen of the atmosphere, hence we are all very liable to look upon nitrogen as play¬ ing a comparatively unimportant role in the phenomena of nature ; and yet, strangely enough, were it not for the action of nitrogen, or rather for the compounds of nitrogen, there would be no life whatever in this world ; there could be no simple cell even built up without the action of this marvellous architect, the nitrogenous compound. Every cell structure, and of course every large aggre¬ gation of cell structures, such as an oak tree, or a man, containing many millions of cell structures, is all built up by the wonderful agency of nitrogen, or rather of its compounds. But while nitrogen is so important an agent, July 3, 1880.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 15 so marvellous a builder up, it is for very similar reasons equally powerful in breaking down. Wherever you have albuminoids present, if there be moisture sufficient, and if there be warmth sufficient, there you have the agent ready for degradation. And hence it follows that man has been obliged to use two chief methods for the purpose of preventing this wonderful degrading power possessed by albuminoids. One method man adopts is heat. By the simple action of heat, some albuminoids are rendered in¬ soluble, and, therefore, inert. You know that if you take ordinary white of egg and boil it, you will, to some extent, prevent the degradation of the albumen, and it will last, or withstand putrefaction, longer than if you had not so boiled it. Heat, together with drying, is a still more powerful method of preventing the attack of these albuminoids. If you were to take perfectly pure cellulose, which exists so largely in woody structure — if it were absolutely free from all kinds of albuminoids — you would find even in moisture it would not decay ; it would last for ages, I may say ; but we also know perfectly well that ordinary wood decays rapidly, especially if there be moisture. Now, the plan adopted in order to overcome this tendency to decay, is either to heat the wood, so as to char a portion of it, as used to be done when wood was charred on the outside to convert it into charcoal. That plan, however, has been replaced to a great extent by the still more efficacious way of acting on the albuminoids so as to precipitate them. Tannic acid and creasote preci¬ pitate the albuminoids, and that is why the leather maker uses the tannic acid in oak bark or Bombay cutch, and By looking at this table we shall learn some very useful facts. In the first place, if we take the analysis of Flemish wheat, we find the insoluble albuminoids are 8 '3, the soluble 2*4 ; in the case of Odessa wheat there are 12*7 insoluble and 1*5 soluble ; Poulard blue, 8*7 insoluble and 1*6 soluble ; in the case of another variety of Poulard wheat we have 13*8 insoluble and 1*8 soluble. He gives also the analysis of the same wheat, but the product of a very dry year, in which the soluble albuminoids are only 1*4. I wish to draw your attention particularly to two or three points of this analysis. First of all, by dividing the insoluble by the soluble, -so as to convert the soluble into unity, we shall have the following ratio : — In the case of the Flemish, the ratio of insoluble to soluble is 4£ to 1 ; Odessa, 9 to 1 ; Poulard, 8 £ to 1 ; Midi, 10 to 1 ; Polish, 12^ to 1, a very large ratio ; Hungarian, 8 -Jr to 1 ; Egyptian, 14 to 1 ; Spanish, 6 to 1 ; and Taganrogg, 10 to 1. We shall see afterwards the importance of this to the miller when he has to consider the best method of mixing his wheats, for the purpose of producing a high- class flour A very interesting point about these analyses of PdLigot is this. I have not had an opportunity of of referring to the original paper, and therefore I do not know whether he himself pointed out this interesting rela¬ tion or not, but if you compare the soluble albuminoids with the amount of what he calls dextrin — of course the methods of analysis thirty-six years ago were not quite so why railway companies take care to creasote their sleepers. The creasote precipitates the albuminoid matters, and therefore those albuminoid matters are not able to de¬ grade the cellulose matter of the wood. So in the same way fish is cured ; the Finnon haddock is preserved for a certain time by the action of smoke ; hams are also so preserved for a certain time. Other methods have been employed, such as the use of salt, and you will find that the baker made use of this agent to prevent, to some extent, the degrading action of the albuminoids. The Egyptians, in the preparation of their mummies, had recourse to the same system, partly by drying and partly by the employment of certain aromatic principles, so that we find that heat, especially dry heat, is one of the means by which we can prevent the degrading action of albumin¬ oids. The other method consists in the employment of chemical reagents, such as corrosive sublimate, tannic acid, creasote, and other matters of that kind, which prevents their activity by the precipitation of albuminoids. We shall presently see more of this when I come to speak of the rationale and object of the kiln-drying of grain. We have seen the great diversity of character of the albuminoids found in the different cereals, and I wish to draw your attention this evening to the degrading influ¬ ences which are brought about in the character of the albuminoids of wheat by climatic influences. I have here the result of the researches of the eminent chemist, Pdligot, on different wheats, taken chiefly from his own country, but to some extent from countries outside France. perfect as we have now at our disposal, but still, taking this dextrin, which is now called maltose, together with dextrin, and comparing it with the soluble albuminoids — you will find a very strange ratio appears, and which is very constant throughout. The ratio of soluble albumin¬ oids to dextrin in the case of Flemish wheat is 1 to 4. Taking the Odessa, which is so very different in character to the Flemish, so large is the amount of insoluble albuminoids compared with that in Flemish, still we have also the ratio of soluble albuminoids to dextrin as 1 to 4. In the case of Poulard blue, there also we have 1 to 4, and so you will find in all cases 1 to 4, until we come to the Hungarian, where the ratio is not quite 1 to 4, but 1 to 3 This, probably is due to some slight error in the analytical process, not to any real difference in the nature of the compounds formed. So it goes on again in the Egyptian and Spanish as 1 to 4, until we come to the Taganrogg, and there it is 1 to 5£. Possibly, this is also due to some error of analysis. With this exception, in a long list, we have the ratio of soluble albuminoids to dextrin always as 1 to 4, evidently indicatiug some definite combination of the albuminoid matter with the sugar bodies. I wish to draw your attention now to some important results published a good many years ago by Messrs. Lawes and Gilbert. Doubtless, to some of you the names of Lawes and Gilbert are well known, but to those who are Analysis of Wheat (Pisligot). Fle¬ mish. Pro¬ vence. Odessa. H£ris- son. Poul¬ ard Roux. Water . 14*6 14*6 15*2 13*2 13*9 Fat . 1*0 1*3 1*5 1*2 1-0 Insoluble albuminoids . 8*3 8*1 127 10*0 87 Soluble albuminoids . . 2*4 1*8 1*6 1*7 1*9 Dextrin . 9-5 8*1 6-3 6*8 7*8 Starch . 627 66*1 61-3 67*1 66*7 Cellulose . 1*8 • • • • • • • • • • • • Saline matter .... • •• ... 1*4 ... ... Poul¬ ard Bleu. Poul¬ ard Bleu. Dry year. Midi. Polish. Hun¬ garian. Egyp¬ tian. Span¬ ish. Tagan rogg. 14*4 13*2 13*6 13*2 14*5 13*5 15*2 14*8 1*0 1*2 1*1 1*5 1*1 1*1 1*8 1*9 13*8 16*7 14*4 19*8 11*8 19*1 8*9 12*2 1*8 1*4 1*6 1*7 1*6 1*5 1*8 1*4 7*2 5-9 6*4 6*8 5*4 6*0 7*3 7*9 59-9 597 59-8 55*1 65*6 59-8 63*6 57*9 1*5 ... 1*4 ... • . • • • • 2*3 1*9 1*9 17 1*9 ... ... 1*4 1*6 16 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS, [July 3, 1880. not so well acquainted with them, I may say that the agricultural interests of England lie under a great debt to the public spirit and enterprise of Mr. Lawes, who has for more than thirtyyears spent some £4000, if, indeed, it is not nearer £5000 a year, on an elaborate series of researches not merely into the influence of season upon wheat, but, into an immense number of matters connected with agri¬ cultural chemistry. He has been most ably assisted in this great national work by his scientific collaborateur, Dr. Gilbert. Influence of Seasons on the Character of Wheat Crops. (Lawes and Gilbert.) Particulars of the Produce. Composition of Grain. Composition of Straw. Harvests. Total Com Per cent. Ter cent. Weiebtper Per cent. Per p.ent Per cent. Percent. Per cent Per cent. aaressed bushel of Dry Ashin Dry. Nitrogon Dry (H2°>. Ash in Dry. Nitrogen per Acre in Total Pro- Corn in Dressed (•-'12° F.). in Dry. in Dry. lbs. duce. * Total Corn. Corniu lbs. — 1845 . . . 5545 33*1 90*1 56*7 80*8 1*91 2*25 7*06 0*92 + 1846 . . . 4114 43*1 93*2 63*1 84*3 1*96 2*15 . • . 6*02 0*67 1847 . . . 5221 36*4 93*6 62*0 ... • • • 2*30 • . • 5*56 0*73 — 1848 . . . 4517 36*7 890 58*5 80*3 2*02 2*39 . . . 7*24 0*78 + 1849 . . . 5320 40*9 95*5 63*5 83*1 1*84 1*94 82*6 6*17 0*82 / 1850 . . . 5496 33*6 94*3 60*9 84*4 1*99 2*15 84*4 5*88 0*87 + 1851 . . . 5279 38*2 92*1 6*2*6 84*2 1*80 1*98 84 7 5*88 0*78 — 1852 . . . 4299 31*6 92*1 56*7 83*2 2*00 2*38 82*6 6*53 0 79 — 1853 . . 3932 25*1 85*9 50*2 80*8 2*24 2*35 81*0 6*27 0*20 / 1854 . . . 6803 35*8 95*6 61*4 84*9 1*93 2*14 83*7 5*08 0 69 Means . . 5053 35*4 92*1 59*6 82*9 1*98 2*20 83*2 6*17 0*82 On referring to this table, you will notice that I have marked certain years, 1846, 1849, and 1851, with a +. Those years were remarkable for the dryness of the summer, the great amount of heat, the long continued heat, and the favourable conditions, not merely in the maturing period, but also in the harvesting period. If we look to the figures there given us by Lawes and Gilbert, we shall find, firstly, that the total weight of produce per acre is very high ; secondly, that there is a high ratio of dressed corn to the total weight of corn ; and, thirdly, that there is a high relative weight of corn. It is put here in pounds per bushel, and those who are well acquainted with agricul¬ tural matters will see, of course, that 63 lbs. per bushel, or 621 lbs., indicates considerable excellence. Now, while the harvest was a favourable one, and the crop was good, we find that the amount of ash in the grain of 1846, was 1*9 ; in 1849, 1*8 ; in 1851, 1*89 ; which are low numbers compared with what we shall find in the bad years. But that is not all, a high produce or a valuable crop, and a high state of maturation of the grain, in other words, considerable excellences in the wheat, are accompanied by a comparatively low ratio of nitrogen — in 1846, 2-15 ; in 1849, 1*94 ; and in 1851, 1'98. Now, let us take the other aspect of the question. The bad years are marked with a — ; 1845 was a bad year ; 1848, the year of political troubles, was also a year of great trouble to the farmers ; 1852 and 1853 were also bad years. Now, if you look at these years, you will see that whilst the total corn is low, the weight of dressed corn is also low. In one year it is only 58 lbs. to the bushel, and in another case 50 lbs. But if we consider the ash, we find it is comparatively high. Take the case of 1848, which is a comparatively bad year, it is 2*02 ; in 1852, 2*0 ; in 1853, 2*24 ; and so on. The nitrogen is very high as well as the ash — I should say the ratio or percentage of nitrogen was high, not the actual amount produced per acre, but there is a high ratio to the corn itself — in 1845, 5*25 ; in 1852, 2*38 ; in 1853, 2*35. Consequently, you see that a high ratio of nitrogen, so far from being coincident with a good character of wheat, is rather coincident with a bad character of wheat, and the same applies to the ash ; a high ash is rather indicative of a low quality of grain. The analyses, given by Dr. Gilbert, were made after drying the corn, so that there is no moisture given here for you to compare with Pdligot’s results, but if you look at Peligot’s results, you will find about 14 per cent., or one-seventh of the whole, consist of water. If we deduct this one-seventh from the nitrogen column of Lawes and Gilbert, we shall then obtain, by simply multiplying what remains by 6*33, the amount of albuminoids, as in the instances given by P^ligot. Now, in the years 1846, 1849, and 1851, when that correction is made, if we com¬ pare Lawes and Gilbert’s with Pdligot’s results, we find that, in those three years, 10*85 was the average amount of the total albuminoids, soluble and insoluble put to¬ gether. We see in the years 1845, 1848, 1852, and 1853, the bad years, that the average total amount of the al¬ buminoids, soluble and insoluble, amounts to 12*7. Thus, therefore, we find that the wheats of the bad years have two per cent, more albuminoid matters than the wheats of the good years. In other words, wheats of bad ela¬ boration have the greatest amount of nitrogen. That, at least, refers to our own country ; and not only is the amount of nitrogen or albuminoids high in bad years, but there is one other very serious matter for the miller, namely, that these albuminoids are not well elaborated. A considerable quantity of them are soluble, like cerealin and albumin, and are high in proportion to the insoluble variety that the miller or baker requires. (To be continued.) larlianunteg mtir fitter Arsenical Colours. In a case which was tried at Guildhall, on June 17, in the High Court of Justice, Queen’s Bench Division, before Mr. Justice Bowen and a common jury, Messrs. Steinhoff sued the defendants, Messrs. W. Woollams and Co., wall paper manufacturers, of High Street, Manchester Square, W., for certain sums said to be due for colours supplied to the latter. Defendants refused payment, on the ground that the colours were verbally guaranteed by the plaintiff’s agent as non- arsenical, whereas one of them, called “Imitation Azure Blue,” did, in fact, contain a large quantity of arsenic. Pre¬ viously to discovering this fact, defendants had used the pigment in the manufacture of wall papers, and as it has been a strict rule with them for years past to allow no arsenical colours to be used in their factory, they were July J, 18S0.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 17 thrown between the alternatives of endangering their reputation by the sale of goods detrimental to the public health, or of having the stock of arsenical paper they had unwittingly manufactured left on their hands. They chose the latter course, and now made a counter claim on the plaintiffs for £370, as compensation for the loss incurred. Mr. Charles Barton Cobbe, traveller to the plaintiff, denied most positively that he had guaranteed the “Imitation Azure Blue ” to be free from arsenic. Mr. W. Muir, partner with the plaintiff, said Mr. Cobbe had no authority to guarantee. His Lordship summed up, and after directing the jury that any statement intended to be a warranty made at the time of sale was a warranty in law, and that if Mr. Cobbe, although not authorized in words, was by his posi¬ tion in the plaintiff’s service authorized in their opinion to do all things needful to sell the colours, and that he did guarantee the colour to be free from arsenic, his employer would be bound by what he said, left it to the jury to say whether the colour was sold free from arsenic by the plaintiff’s agent, and whether he was authorized to give a warranty. The jury found for the defendants Messrs. Woollams on both poiuts, and a verdict was entered accordingly, the amount of damages to be settled by arbitration. Pharmaceutische Chemie. Yon F. A. Fluckiger. Erster und zweiter Theile. Berlin, 1879. Yerlag von Rudolph Goertner. Pharmaceutical Chemistry. By F. A. Fluckiger. In two volumes. Berlin, 1879. Published by Rudolph Goertner. Professor Fluckiger is well and favourably known to British pharmacy, not only as co-author of a standard work on materia medica, but as a contributor to this Journal, and it is with interest of a very active kind that we inquire to what degree is his reputation supported or raised by the material now before us ? The plan of ‘ Pharmaceutische Chemie ’ is one with which we do not think English readers will find them¬ selves familiar, though the point of view which we believe to have been taken in framing it shows much that may be advanced in its favour. The author has set to work in a very matter-of-fact way. His material has been obtained from the shelves and cupboards of a well- appointed pharmacy, and his classification of it has all the simplicity of nature improved, and occasionally complicated, by art. A list of the classes in vol. i. will illustrate the plan : — 1. Non-metallic elements. 2. Metals. 3. Binary compounds of non-metals, except acids and hydrocarbons. 4. Cyanogen group. 5. Hydrocarbons derived from methane. 6. Alcohols. 7. Non-aromatic organic acids. 8. Fat, soap and wax. 9. Carbohydrates. 10. Resins. 11. Benzols. 12. Ethereal oils. 13. Alkaloids. To complete the scheme, — in vol. ii. class xiv. is devote to the inorganic bases and peroxides ; class xv., to inor¬ ganic acids and acid anhydrides ; classes xvi. to xxxiii., to a consideration of the various metallic salts, and class xxxiv., which is the last, to short biographical notices of authors quoted. The selection of material for a work of this character depends not less upon the information than upon the judgment of the compiler. If we did not know that Professor Fliiclciger’s information was of a very extended character, and if we had not already good reason for believing that the judgment associated with it was correct, the volumes before us would be assurance of both. Speaking strictly in view of the plan of the work, we do not find that what is excluded would have added materially to its value, or that anything it contains could well be spared. Apparently, the author has worked within sharply defined lines which rarely shade off into indis¬ tinctness, as though, commencing with the determination of admitting nothing but what was obviously within the domain of pharmacy he had yet been tempted to include outlying though related substances by an artistic desire of giving roundness and completeness to his work. Hy¬ drogen and oxygen are rigorously excluded, though the former is actually employed in the preparation of reduced iron and the latter is of such universal importance that it would seem to call loudly for notice in a work on Pharmaceutical Chemistry, even though such notice be only historical. We find the key to the style of proce¬ dure, of which the instance just cited is the most notable, in an examination of the material itself, which to our mind is not treated so as to teach chemistry at all, either pharmaceutical or any other. It affords a vast mass of information on substances used in medicine laid down in that indicative mood of which Professor Fluckiger is master and is obviously intended for men who already possess a good knowledge of chemistry ; to any other the value is greatly reduced by an almost total want of refe¬ rence to the science of chemistry. Almost the only feature which is inconsistent with this idea of the intent of the volumes is afforded by the way in which the atomic weight of an element is indicated. This is given not as a number attached to the name or symbol, but by saying as in the case of chlorine “ the specific gravity is 35'5 times more than that of hydrogen.” Whilst this statement is more than enough for the educated student who finds it in what is for him a work of reference, it is not enough for the student who is learning chemistry. Our attention is all the more arrested by this circumlocu¬ tion in that the acknowledged power of the writer to express himself with illuminating terseness is largely exhibited in the rest of the book. It is true that in the present instance his power is exercised on the objective side of a science whose only footing is in visible nature, but even under such favouring circumstances, compact diction is sufficiently rare to be admired when met with. Professor Fluckiger has in these volumes bestowed a wealth of information on pharmacy in its chemical rela¬ tions which cannot fail to be of the greatest possible value to those engaged in the practice of it, whether in Germany or England. Sulphur, most important both as an element and a natural product, though disposed of in six pages, receives a share of attention and is the subject of treatment in detail which corresponds to its many and varied applications in pharmaceutical and general chemistry. Appearing in the class of non-metallic ele¬ ments, it is comprised in three sections, of which section 4 gives the sources, production and characters ; section 5 is on sublimed sulphur and includes a notice of washed sulphur, whilst section 6 treats of the preparation, properties and testing of precipitated sulphur and closes with a general historical note. A peculiarity of the arrangement is that washed and precipitated sulphur have each a section to themselves and are as distinct from sulphur as the latter is from phosphorus or iodine. The short biographical notices are short indeed, and names of many living men are omitted. For example, although Groves and Wright are quoted on page 406, they do not appear amongst these notices, but when wre find that an illustrious name is disposed of thus : — “ Cavendish, Heinrich, 1731 — 1810. London. Mit- glied der Royal Society, sections 29, 39, 529, 729.” we are more inclined to congratulate than pity them. 18 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [July 3, i860. The nine hundred or more pages are well printed, and the equations in particular stand out in clear bold type which catches the eye at once. The index is not so complete as could be desired though it includes the most important substances mentioned. Notice has been received of the death of the fol¬ lowing : — On the 20th of May, 1880, Mr. John Hird, Chemist and Druggist, Pembroke. Aged 47 years. On the 9th of June, 1880, Mr. Joseph Henry Williams Pees, Chemist and Druggist, Belmont, Bath. Aged 30 years. On the 18th of June, 1880, Mr. Miles Thomas Lewis, Chemist and Druggist, Strand, W.C. Aged 38 years. On the 19th of June, 1880, Mr. Charles Edward Stansmore, Chemist and Druggist, Marchmont Street, W.C. Aged 54 years. On the 22nd of June, 1880, at Edgbaston, Mr. Morris Banks, Chemist and Druggist, formerly of Birmingham. Aged 75 years. On the 22nd of June, 1880, Mr. David McDowell, Chemist and Druggist, South Shields. Aged 47 years. BOOKS, PAMPHLETS, ETC., RECEIVED. Alphabetical Manual of Blow-pipe Analysis, show¬ ing all known Methods, Old and New. By Lieut.- Col. W. A. Ross. London : Trubner and Co. 1880. Prom the Publishers. Kelly’s Directory of Chemists and Druggists, in¬ cluding Chemical Manufacturers, Wholesale Druggists, Drysalters, Patent Medicine Vendors, and other Trades connected therewith, of England, Scotland and Wales, and the principal Towns of Ireland. Fourth edition. London : Kelly and Co. 1880. From the Publishers. gisjiensmg Utewarantra* In order to assist as much as 'possible our younger brethren, for whose salce partly this column was established, considerable latitude is allowed, according to promise, in the propounding of supposed difficulties. But the right will be exercised of excluding too trivial questions, or re¬ petitions of those that have been previously discussed in principle. And we would suggest that those who meet with difficulties should before sending them search previous numbers of the Journal to see if they can obtain the re¬ quired information. Replies. [412], If the prescription was written as represented H. H. R. would be right in directing two teaspoonfuls for a dose. Square. [421] . Strained manna with or without the pulv. acacise and made up with mucilage will answer. Square. [421], In dissolving zinci chlor. it is advisable to have it as dry as possible before adding to the water. A very weak solution of HC1 added drop by drop will dissolve any flocculent matter. The above is adopted in some West-end houses. To filter would be wrong. Square. [422]. “Bdfrd.” did quite right in the absence of any directions on prescription Square. [423]. Provided “Bdfrd.” powdered the sacch. lact. as finely as possible prior to mixing with the hyd. c. creta (otherwise the gritty powder may separate the hy. from the ca.) he was correct, as dispensers are supposed to weigh and not guess each powder. Square. Queries . [424] . R Quinse Sulph . 7) i j. Tinct. Ferri Perchlor . 3j- Acid. Sulph. Dil . q.s. Aq . ad gij. The 3j of tinct. ferri is sufficient to dissolve the quinine. Should any acid, sulph. dil. be added? This mixture, after standing some time, deposits a thick sediment. Can it be dispensed so as to avoid this, and of what does the sediment consist ? Vis. [425] . What is the best mode of dispensing the follow¬ ing, and what appearance should it present ? — R Potass. Iodid . 3iiss* Ferri et Quin. Citrat. . .... 3ij- Tinct. Nucis Vomic . 3ij- Sp. Ammon. Arom . gss. Aquam . ad gviij. Gr. H. [426] . Ought the following to appear as clear as water or slightly turbid ? — R Liq. Am. et Bism. Cit . gj. Lithiae Citrat . . 3SS- Tr. Nucis. Vom . 3ss. Tr. Colchici . 3ss. Aquae . gvij. M. The mixtures that I prepared were slightly turbid, like tr. aurant. et aquae, but elsewhere they have been per¬ fectly clear and transparent, and not so Strong in flavour. Query. [427] . C. B. would like the opinions of some of our senior dispensers on the following prescription : — R Spt. Vini. Rectif . 3^3- Ung. Zinci Benzoat . gij. M. Ft. ung. Should the B.P. ung. zinci be used or one (of the same strength) made with zinci benzoas? Is the latter a definite salt or only a mixture of zinc oxide and benzoin or benzoic acid ? [428]. What is the best method of dispensing the following formula : — • R Quiniae Salicylatis . gr. xij. Sp. Chlor. . . 3ij. Inf. Aurant. Co . . . ad g8 M. Ft. mist. Capt. gj. ter die. I have made it different ways and cannot send out a presentable mixture. A. A. F. [429]. R Tinct. Ferri Mur . gss. Tinct. Digitalis . gss. Acid. Phosph. Dil. . . .. . . . gss. Potass. Acet. ........ 3ij- Aquam . ad gvj. M. Sig. A teaspoonful in a large wineglassful of water three times a day. In dispensing the above prescription I obtained a dense white precipitate as the result of various methods of mixing the ingredients. Can this result be obviated ? What reaction takes place? And does the following equation correctly represent the reaction ? — Fe2Cl6 + 6 KC2H302 = Fe26 C2H302 + 6 KC1. Fe26 C2H302 + 2 H3P04 = 2 FeP04 + 6 HC2H302 . Pharmakon. July 3, 1S80.J THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS, 19 [430]. What is the best method of dispensing the following prescription ? — ft Plumbi Acetat . £iij. Zinci Sulph. . ....... Jpv. Acid. Phenic. Xtal . M. Ft. pulv. et sign. One teaspoonful to half a pint of water, to be used as directed. Samuel Lawrence. [431]. Is there any excipient for J gr. of permanganate potash in pill, all organic matters reducing it ? A pre¬ server is in great perplexity as to some suitable ex¬ cipient. Oxygen. [432]. What is is the best way to make up the follow¬ ing:— ft. Pot. Iod . gr. iij. Quince Sulph . gr. j. Syr. Aurant. . . 3SS- Aquam . ad Zij. . H. IIyne. [433]. “ Jacque ” would like to know what colour the following mixture should be. As it was dispensed in London it presented a greenish appearance, but his own appeared a brownish yellow:— ft Potass. Citratis . 3V 9j* Tr. Nucis Vom . in, 80. Quinise Sulph . gr. xvj. Tr. Ferri Acetatis . 3V ^ xx* Aquae Camph . ad 58. Jlotcs untr (Queries. [657]. Some years ago, in one of those brilliant but unpublished remarks at our evening meetings by the late Mr. Morson, he said, “ I do not know the reason why substances should change their character when uncom¬ bined, but I do know this, nature is very particular before she makes that complex body morphia to have plenty of meconic acid ready to take care of it directly it is formed, and in the young poppy plant you may con¬ stantly find the acid without the morphia.’’ Just so with ammonia. I do not like, and would not take if I knew it, liq. am. acet. or liq. amon. cit. prepared from liquor ammonise. I decidedly prefer that from the carbonate, especially “the volcanic.” George Mee. [662] . BLACK STAIN. — Will some one kindly in¬ form me what is used for staining cane black ? I have tried several things, viz., logwood and ferri sulph. boiled, black dye, acid, sulph., etc., without success. The same method that is adopted in staining horn combs might suffice, but I am not acquainted with it. The object of staining the cane is that it might be used instead of whale¬ bone in stays. W. J. Tuck. 1 1 ■ — / [663] . ZmCOGRAPHIC TRANSFER PROCESS. — Will any of your readers kindly inform we what is the best method of charging the zinc plate with gum in the zincographic transfer process ? Pharmacist. [664]. HAIR RESTORER.— Will some kind reader of the Journal furnish me with a thoroughly reliable for¬ mula for hair restorer, clean to use and harmless ? Grey Locks. [665]. TICKET INK.— Can you give me a form for the brilliant black ink used by window ticket writers ? H. W. Tunley. CorrcspoabcRCc, Crystallized versus Amorphous Aconitine. Sir, — Having been requested by Dr. C. Rice, of New York, Chairman of the Committee of Revision of the U.S.A. Pharmacopoeia, to draw up an account of the cha¬ racteristics of pure crystallized aconitine in such a manner as to serve, as far as practicable, as criteria of purity and identity, I append to this note a copy of the remarks I have put together for him J thinking that the subject is one of some little importance now that the use of powerful drugs like aconitine is extending not only in reference to external application, but also for internal administration, e.g., in accordance with the methods of treatment recently expounded by Dr. Burggrave, of Ghent, and those adopted by other practitioners. It requires little argument to show that granting that it is not very material whether the chief active ingredient in a lotion is present in a given propor¬ tion, or to half or double that extent, provided the limits of variation are not widely different (such as 10 to 1 or 100 to 1), this ia no way holds good when this ingredient is to be administered internally, more especially when the character of the physiological action of the substances naturally admixed with this ingredient _ (in varying pro¬ portions with drugs of different sources and origin) is wholly unknown and cannot be allowed for. In such a case as this, it is evident that the use of a single definite substance, carefully isolated in a state of purity, permits of the dose being regulated and the action of the drug studied in a way wholly impracticable when a crude impure drug is employed containing an unknown percentage of active ingredient and unknown amounts of other bodies of pos¬ sibly quite different properties. Dr. Rice concludes his letter to me with the following words: — “The medical profession over here is disgusted with the worthless commercial article, and, if the pure alka¬ loid could be obtained, would use it in very considerable quantities.” On making inquiries of Mr. John Williams (Messrs. Hopkin and Williams, 16, Cross Street, Hatton Garden, E.C.), I understand the chief impediments in the way of supplying pure crystallized aconitine (from A. Napellus) are twofold. Firstly, as a general rule, purchasers object to paying the high price at which the pure article must necessarily be sold on account of the great cost of production, so long as an impure article is in the market at a much lower price (even though that be comparatively high) ; and secondly, it is not every batch of roots that will yield the crystallized base, even though the mode of manufacture be uniformly the same ; which I expect, judging from my own experience in the matter, means to say that whilst some batches of roots contain a larger pro¬ portion of crystallizable base and smaller quantities of non-crystallizable alkaloids, so that a considerable per¬ centage of crystallized alkaloid can be isolated in the manu¬ facturing way, other batches contain less crystallizable aconitine and so much of the non-crystalline bodies that what crystallizable aconitine is present cannot be induced to separate by crystallization from the other impurities. It appears to me that the first difficulty is one which will in time cure itself. If prescribers insist that the pure alkaloid only shall be used, dispensers are bound to supply it, even should the pure substance cost twenty times as much as the impure article now usually sold. The question of cost really only affects the patient and not the dispenser, who will simply charge more for making up the prescrip¬ tion. Besides, the activity of the pure alkaloid is so great that the actual weight of substance used in any prescrip¬ tion would be excessively small, and its actual value, therefore, not great, even were the drug an enormously costly one. Moreover, from another point of view, it is just possible that it might be held that the sale under the name of “ aconitine ” of a substance which is not actually aconitine, but a mixture of that substance with other bodies naturally occurring with it, and not perfectly separated from it, is as much an offence under the Sale of Food and Drugs Act as would be the sale of morphine contaminated with a large amount of narcotine imperfectly separated in the manufacture, or of quinine containing much cin¬ chonine, under the names of morphine and quinine respec¬ tively. In the latter two cases I take it that it would be * See before p. 2. 20 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [July 3, 1880. difficult to contend tliat the impure article was not sold to the prejudice of the purchaser, and that it was of the nature and quality demanded ; whilst it is nr t easy to see in what respect the sale of aconitine stands on a different legal footing. As regards the second difficulty, a simple cure at once suggests itself. At the present moment the price of aconite loots is fixed by considerations which, however valuable they may be as indications, are certainly not calculated to give any adequate idea of the percentage of pure crys- tallizable alkaloid to be extracted from the roots. Let the manufacturer purchase roots, not by rule of thumb and in the dark, but on the strength of an analytical certificate showing that when the roots are treated by such-and-such a method (the exact details of which should be specified like the details of the anthracene tests), 100 parts of roots yield so many parts of aconitine in the crystallized state, or as a crystallized salt, e.g., the nitrate. The manu¬ facturer then would have it in his power to reject batches of roots which cannot be worked up iuto crystallizable alka¬ loid or which will not give a satisfactory yield thereof; and would thus avoid the irregular results justly considered by Mr. Williams to be a great bar to the production on a manufacturing pcale of the pure base. In connection with this it may be remarked that the effects of variation of soil and climate on A. Napellus roots (and other species), so far as regards the quantity of crys¬ tallizable and other bases obtainable from a given weight of root, are at present wholly unknown. The questions as to whether the best yield of crystallized base is obtained w ith young, mature, or old roots ; as to how far the pseud- aconitine of A. ferox and the alkaloid allied to aconitine obtainable from Japanese roots can be substituted for aconitine itself with advantage, and many other analogous questions require working out. On this latter point the comparative physiological experiments of Dr. Fraser, of Edinburgh, now in progress with specimens prepared by the writer, will, it is to be hoped, throw some light. In reference to the former point it may be noticed that a batch of fresh aconite stems and flowers worked up in much the same way as the roots by the writer, has yielded a product which, whilst evidently containing some amount of aconi¬ tine, is yet so charged with amorphous bases that the aconitine cannot be separated by crystallization either as alkaloid or salt. How far this is a characteristic difference between the stems and roots, however, can only be decided by further experiments. Chemical Laboratory, C. R. Alder-Wright, D.Sc. St. Mary's Hospital , W. Apothecaries’ Weights and Measures. Sir, — I have just received official intimation that the standards for apothecaries’ weights and measures have been received in Liverpool and have thought it well to commu¬ nicate the fact through the medium of the Journal to the chemists and druggists of this district. The Act now being fully adopted here, it will be well that all concerned should at once comply with the require¬ ments of the law. Liverpool. Charles Symes. Mr. Cyrus Buott. ‘ 4 1 am not what I was. I feel these years Have done sad office for me ; and that time, Which I had dreamed might fling around the path On which I ventured something of that light Which cheers life like a halo, hath but cast A sickly shadow o’er my pilgrimage.” Sir, — With your permission I wish to make another appeal on behalf of old Mr. Cyrus Buott, the late Editor of the Chemists and Druggists' Advocate, and late proprietor of the Medico-Pharmaceutical Abstract and Review. Many of your readers will better remember Mr. Buott as the vigorous Secretary of the United Society of Chemists and Druggists, a society which, at one time, had considerable influence on pharmaceutical politics. The unhappy condi¬ tion of this old gentleman, who has lived to the age of eighty years to find himself worsted in the struggle for existence, is truly pitiable. About four years since, I ventured to appeal to the benevolent hearts which abound in our trade in help of Mr. Buott, and the response was most generous and beneficent. The tide of adversity has, however, once more overtaken him, and I again plead for such assistance that will enable him to live the few remain¬ ing years of his life free from the assaults of poverty and corrosive cares. I shall be glad to receive and acknowledge through the medium of the Journal, the donations resulting from this petition. 205, St. John Street Road, E.C. Robt. Hampson. Viviparous Plants. Sir, — At page 37 of Ehind’s ‘Vegetable Kingdom,’ your correspondents will find the following: — “The name of bulbils is applied to a kind of small solid or scaly buds, that grow on different parts of a plant, and are susceptible of vegetating by themselves ; or which, when detached from the parent plant, become developed and produce a vegetable perfectly similar to that whence they derive their origin. Plants bearing buds of this kind are named viviparous. They may occur in the axilla of the leaves. At other times they are produced in the place of the flowers. The nature of the bulbils is similar to that of the bulbs properly so called. Sometimes they are scaly, at others solid and compact.” Liverpool. J. B. O. Upward Percolation. Sir, — I find that the idea itself of upward percolation has been anticipated nearly twenty-two years ago in a a letter to the Pharmaceutical Journal, by Mr. A. W. 1'. Smith, who gave a figure of the apparatus he used. He did not, however, record any results of experiments with the percolator, such as form the bulk of my paper. 10, Burton Crescent, W.C. William Elbourne. Pharmaceutical Student. — Your questions should be addressed to the Registrar under the Dental Act, 315, Oxford Street, at the same time informing him upon what grounds you propose to claim registration, a point that you have ignored in your communication to us. Rob. — See a paper on the ] reparation of “ Permanent Essence of Bennett ” in Pharm. Journ. for Oct. 19, 1873 (vol. ix., p. 307). A. Deck. — We should think the crystals could bo obtained by applying to Dr. Theodor Schurhardt, Goerlitz. J. W. Garrett. — Symphytum tuberosum, Stellaria glauca, and Lotus hispida would be plants very unlikely to be met with in the locality mentioned. W e should like therefore to see specimens before making use of your note. Veritas. — Your letter appears to have more to do with the business of the office than with that of the Journal. It has therefore been handed to the Secretary. J. B. Shilcock. — If the proprietary medicine for veterinary use be capable of being used as a beverage or as a medicine for internal administration it will come within the terms of the Act. F. Gall. — (1) Thalictrum jlavum. (2) Anthyllis vul- neraria. W. Stewart. — Conium maculatum. R. E. Williams. — (1) The reaction was due to free alkali in the potassium cyanide. (2) A general knowledge of the whole would be necessary. (3) The occurrence is interesting if the whole of the flower is white. (4) We are not aware that powders are at present sent out from Bloomsbury Square for analysis. 3 — (1) “Quina” was the orthography adopted in the London Pharmacopoeia. (2) Cinkona. B. P. — The general practice is to follow the usual rule of giving a soft sound to the letter c when coming immediately before the vowel e. The exceptional practice is based upon an opinion that would not be affected by the use of a cedilla mark. Camphor. — We cannot endorse your opinion that it should be made compulsory upon a chemist and druggist, to keep every drug mentioned in the Pharmacopoeia if he does not consider it to his interest to do so. Re. — We have no knowledge of the details beyond what is conveyed in the report. Communications, Letters, etc., have been received from Messrs. Claypole, Bradshaw, Garrett, Kermath, Coleman, Prentice Bros., J. B.O., Wide Awake, Temporary Assistant. July'lO, 1880.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 21 NOTES ON INDIAN DRUGS. BY W. DYMOCK. {Continued from page 994, Vol. X.) Acorus calamus, Linn., Arace;e. The rhizome. Vernacular : Bacha, Bach (Hind., Beng.); Yek- hand (Bomb.). History, Uses, etc. — This plant, originally a native of Central Asia, is now established in most parts of Europe ; it is the ‘ acoron ’ of the Greek and the ^vacha5 of Sanskrit writers. The Arabs call it 1 waj ’ and ‘ood-ul-waj,’ evidently corrupted forms of the Sanskrit name. Some consider it to be identical with the ‘ calamus aromaticus’ of Dioscorides, but against this we have the authority of the Arabic and Persian writers, who state that the ‘ kalum armktik ’ of the Greeks was a kind of cliiretta ; Royle would have it to be an andropogon. The Hindus consider the sweetflag to be emetic in large, and carminative, stimulant and tonic in small doses. As an emetic a drachm and a half to two drachms is given in a tumbler full of warm salt and water ; as a tonic it is usually combined with other bitters and aromatics ; as a stimulant it is added to other remedies in paralytic and nervous affections. The Mahometans describe it as deob¬ struent and depurative, useful for the expulsion of the phlegmatic humours which they suppose to be the cause of paralysis, dropsy and many other diseases ; they recommend it to be given to children to bite when teething and prescribe it internally in calculous affections. It has also a reputation as a diuretic, emmenagogue and aphrodisiac, and is applied in the form of poultice to paralysed limbs and rheumatic swellings. A pessary com¬ posed of acorus, saffron and mares’ milk is used to promote delivery ; a hip bath of the decoction is also said to be efficient for this purpose. j Description. — The root stock occurs in somewhat tortuous, sub-cylindrical cr flattened pieces, a few inches long and from 4 — 1 inch in greatest dia¬ meter. Each piece is obscurely marked on the upper surface with the scars, often hairy, of leaves, and on the under with a zigzag line of little, elevated, dot-like rings, the scars of roots. The root stock is usually rough and shrunken, varying in colour from dark brown to orange brown, breaking easily with a short corky fracture, and exhibiting a pale brown spongy interior. The odour is aromatic and agreeable, the taste bitterish and pungent. Microscopic Structure. — A section of the rhizome is like an open net work, composed of rows of nearly round cells and open spaces (water passages). Most of the cells contain small starch granules, but some of them essential oil. At the junction of the cortical and central portions of the rhizome is a very distinct row of small empty cells. The vas¬ cular bundles are numerous, especially just within the line of small cells just noticed ; each bundle consists of a ring of spiral vessels surrounding a number of jointed tubes. Commerce. — Two kinds of vekhand are met with in this market: multani, value Rs. 34 permaund of 41 pounds ; ghati, value Rs. 24. Arum margaritiferum, Roxb. (?), Arace^e. A large Amorphophallus, growing at Asnora in the Goa territory, which I have only seen in fruit, will, I think, prove to be this species. The country Third Series, No. 524. people use the crushed seed to cure toothache. A small quantity is placed in the hollow tooth and covered with cotton ; it rapidly benumbs the nerve . They also use it as an external application to bruises, on account of its benumbing effect. The fruit is yellow, about the shape and size of a pis¬ tachio nut, closely set round the upper part of the spike, which is several feet in height and as large as that of the plantain. The skin of the fruit is tough, the pulp scanty and yellow ; it encloses two seeds having the shape of a coffee bean, and placed with their flat surfaces in apposition. The testa of the seed is soft, greenish-brown externally, green in¬ ternally ; the kernel is white, adhering closely to the testa, soft and juicy when fresh, but rapidly be¬ coming hard and dry when cut. The taste is in¬ tensely acrid ; after a few seconds it causes a most painful burning of the tongue and lips, which lasts for a long time, causing much salivation and subse¬ quent- numbness. A section of the fruit and seed shows the following structure from without inwards. (1). Several rows of thick-walled cells, having yellowish-brown granular contents (skin). (2). A parenchyma composed of thin-walled cells, having no solid contents except needle-shaped crystals (pulp). (3). Several rows of small cells, containing chlorophyll (testa of seed). (4). A delicate paren¬ chyma, the cells of which are loaded with very small starch granules, mostly round, some truncated (kernel). The Goa name of the plant is ‘uzomut’ or ‘ azoriant.’ Curculigo orchioides, Gaertn., Hypoxide.e. The root. Vernacular : Kali-musli, Musli-kand (Hind., Beng., Bomb.); Nilap-panaik-kizhangu (Tam.). History , Uses , etc. — Both Hindu and Mahometan writers speak of two kinds of musli, which from their description appear to be species of Curculigo, which they describe as white and black ; the former probably the translucent dried root of C. orchioides, and the latter the root of C. uncifolia. The suffed- musli of the shops is quite a different article, being the tuber of an asparagus. The author of the ‘Mahkzan’ describes the root of the musli as tapering and like the Egyptian shakakul. He says that some prefer the white variety and some the black. In Bombay we meet only with the black kind. It is collected in the Concon and Guzerat, where C. uncifolia is very abundant. . It must be borne in mind that the word ‘ musli ’ (in Sanskrit ‘mushli’) means any tapering root, and is often loosely applied. Native medical works give the following instructions for collecting musli : — Two year old plants are to be selected, and the roots having been washed and cleared of rootlets are to be sli ced with a wooden knife, threaded upon a string, and dried in the shade; when dry they may be powdered. The dose is 180 grs., to be beaten up with 180 grs. of sugar in a small glass of water, until it forms a thick mucilage. Treatment to be continued for forty days, abstinence from mental and physical exercise being enjoined. Musli is prescribed in asthma, piles, jaundice, diarrhoea, colic and gonor¬ rhoea. It is considered to be demulcent, diuretic, tonic and aphrodisiac, and is generally combined with aromatics and bitters for administration. Description. — Musli occurs as short tranverse sections of the root, half an inch or less in diameter, covered externally by a dark brown bark. The 22 the pharmaceutical journal and transactions. [July 10, 1880. ' substance of the root in the black variety is opaque and greyish-brown ; in the white, amber coloiired and translucent. Portions of the characteristic wrinkled vermicular rootlets may usually be found attached to some of the x>ieces. The taste is mucila¬ ginous and slightly bitter. Microscopic Structure. — The fresh root of C. unci- folia when cut across presents a firm milk-white opaque surface, marked with numerous minute punctures. Thin sections show that it consists of a cortical and central portion, both composed mainly of a delicate parenchymatous tissue, loaded with small starch granules ; here and there a large cell contains a bundle of needle-shaped crystals. The large open passages, which can be seen with the naked eye, are almost entirely confined to the corti¬ cal portion ; they are lined by the walls of the neighbouring cells. In the central column are numerous bundles of spiral vessels, which are mostly situated near its junction with the cortical portion. Many of the starch granules are muller-shaped. Chemical Compositions — The drug has not been examined. Commerce. — Most of the bazaar musli comes from Rutlam in Malwa. Value Rs. 4 per maund of 37| lbs. Crinfm asiaticum, Linn., Liliace.e. The blah and hares. Vernacular: Sukhdarsan, Bara¬ ka var (Hind., Beng.) ; Visha-mungil (Tam.) ; Nagdowx (Bomb.). History, Uses, etc. — lhave not met with any account of this drug in native works on materia medica, nor does it appear to be used medicinally in Bombay, though the plant is very common. Ainslie informs us that the natives of Southern India bruise the leaves and mix them with a little castor oil, so form¬ ing an application which they think useful for re- pelling whitlows and other inflammations that come at the ends of the toes and fingers ; also, that the juice of the leaves is employed for ear-ache in Upper India. Rumpliius, who calls it ‘radix toxicaria,’ (Amb., ii.,p. 155 to 169), speaks highly of its viitues in curing the disease occasioned by the poisoned arrows of the Macassers in their wars ; it is the root chewed that is the emetic, provided a little of the juice is swallowed. The Crinum asiaticum is the man-sy- lan of the Cochin Chinese and its virtues may be found lauded by Loureiro (Ainslie, ‘ Mat. Ind.,’ vol. ii., p. 464.) Sir W. O’Shaughnessy remaiks (‘Beng. Disp.,’ p. 656), that this is the only indigenous and abundant emetic plant, of which he has experience, which acts without producing griping, purging or other unpleasant symptoms. In the Pliar. of India the root has been made official as an emetic, nauseant and diaphoretic. Directions for making a juice and syrup are given ; the former to be given in doses of 2 — 4 fluid drachms every 20 minutes until emesis is produced, the latter in doses of 2 fluid drachms as a nauseant and emetic for children. Description. — Caulescent or stemless ; leaves linear- lanceolate, very smooth ; margins entire, striated beneath, 3 — 4 feet long and 5—7 inches broad ; scapes axillary, shorter than the leaves, a little com¬ pressed ; flowers numerous, 12 — 50 in an umbel, white, almost inodorous ; berries roundish, the size of a pigeon’s egg (‘Bombay Flora,’ pt. I., p.275). The root is bulbous, white, with a terminal stoloni- ferous fusiform portion issuing from the crown of the bulb. It varies greatly in size ; odour narcotic and disagreeable. Microscopic Structure. — The central portion of the bulb (stoloniferous fusiform portion) consists of a parenchyma made up of polyhedral cells containing a little granular matter and some needle-shaped crystals; it is traversed by numerous bundles of jointed and spiral vessels. Surrounding the central portion is a solid cortical layer, less vascular than the central column. From both of these spring the subterraneous white bases of the leaves, which form the upper part of the bulb. Chemical Composition. — Nothing is known. Commerce. — Not an article of commerce. ( To be continued.) OPIUM SMOKING APPARATUS. The following note upon this subject has been placed at our disposal by Professor W. T. Thiselton Dyer, Assistant Director of the Royal Gardens,. Kew : — The number of articles employed by an opium- smoker in China in the process of fumigation is very considerable, but I am not aware that they have ever been described. We are indebted to Dr. Hance, the well-known botanist, who has turned his official position as Vice-Consul at Whampoa to the greatest advantage in the interests of science, for the very complete specimen of an opium smoker’s outfit which is now exhibited in the Kew Museum.* He has also furnished us with the accompanying memorandum describing the several articles and their mode of use, which has been drawn up by Mr. Sampson. Description of Opium Smoldng Apparatus.- — The tray is usually of larger size than that sent herewith (which is of Japanese make) and is made of black wood inlaid with mother-of-pearl. All the appa¬ ratus is neatly arranged on the tray, which is placed in the centre of a large square Couch, so that a man can lie on either side of it. The essential contents of the tray consist of a lamp, a stand for spare bowls, a pot for the opium, and a dipper. The bowl-stand herewith sent is made to hold three spare bowls ; a Chinese opium smoker has as many fancies about his pipes as a tobacco smoker has of his meerschaums. The lamp is some¬ times made of glass, and sometimes of metal ; it is essential that the cover be so arranged as to prevent smoke coming from the flame. The opium pots are sometimes made of silver; those sent herewith are of horn. A small quautity of prepared opium is also sent as a specimen, in a glass bottle. The two iron things with wooden handles are to scrape out the bowl when it becomes foul ; the scrapings form the “opium dross,” which is sold to those who want a strong but cheap alid ill-flavoured smoke. The two iron things without wooden handles are the “dippers” above mentioned, one end being pointed and the other flattened. There is also a tin box in which the scrapings and opium ashes may be put. An opium smoker takes great pride in the neatness of his tray, and adorns it with other little contrivances both use¬ ful and ornamental. Lying on his side, with his face towards the tray and his head resting on a high hard pillow (some¬ times made of earthenware, but more frequently of bamboo covered with leather), the smoker takes the pipe in his hand ; with the other hand he takes a * The authorities of the Kew Museum having since come into the possession of a second set of the apparatus, one set has been presented to the Museum of the Pharmaceuti¬ cal Society through Professor Dyer. — Ed. Pharm. Journ. , July 10, 1830.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL .JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 23 dipper and puts tlie sharp end of it into the opium, which is of a treacly consistency. Twisting it round and round he gets a large drop of the fluid to adhere to the dipper; still twisting it round to prevent it falling, he brings the drop over the flame of the lamp and twirling it round and round he roasts it ; all this is done with acquired dexterity. The opium must not be burnt or made too dry, but roasted gently till it looks like burnt worsted ; every now and then he takes it away from the flame and rolls it (still on the end of the dipper) on the flat surface of the bowl. When it is roasted and rolled to his satisfaction, he gently heats the centre of the bowl, where there is a small orifice ; then he quickly thrusts the end of the dipper into the orifice, twirls it round smartly, and withdraws it ; if this is properly done the opium (now about the size of a grain of hemp- seed or a little larger) is left adhering to the bowl immediately over the orifice. It is now ready for smoking. The smoker assumes a comfortable attitude (lying down of course) at a proper distance from the lamp. He now puts the stem to his lips and holds the bowl over the lamp. The heat causes the opium to frizzle, and the smoker takes three or four long inhalations, all the time using the dipper to bring every particle of the opium to the orifice as it burns away, but not taking his lips from the end of the stem or the opium pellet from the lamp till it is all finished. Then he uses the flattened end of the dipper to scrape away any little residue there may be left around the orifice, and proceeds to prepare another pipe. The preparations occupy about five or ten minutes, and the actual smoking about thirty seconds. The smoke is swallowed and is exhaled through both the mouth and the nose.— Theo. Sampson, Canton, September 24, 1879. We have a model of an opium smoker’s couch with two smokers carved in Pai-c’ha wood procured for us by Mr. W. M. Cooper, H.M. Consul at Ningpo. This is exhibited in the same case with the smoker’s tray in the Kew Museum. The mode of smoking is also illustrated by some wood cuts (from Chinese blocks) given in ‘China’s Millions,’ 1878, pp. 22, 45. ERGOT AND THE ERGOTINES.* BT E. SCHMITT. Although the botanical nature and microscopic struc¬ ture of ergot are now well known, the same cannot be said respecting its chemical constitution. The earliest labours upon the composition of ergot are due to Vauquelin and Legrip in France, and Maas and Wiggers in Germany. The first complete chemical ana¬ lysis was published in 1831 by Wiggers, and it was then that the first mention was made of ergotine as the active principle of ergot. With ergotine there were also men¬ tioned a red colouring matter, a non-saponifiable fatty oil, a sugar that was specially studied by Mitscherlich, fun- gine, ash very rich in phosphoric acid, etc. As to the more recent investigations a resume of them is to be found in the Traite de Pharmacognosie of Dr. Albert Wigand (Berlin, 1879) and another in a memoir by Dr. Daubraiva in the Zeitschrift d. aRgemeinen cesterreich. Apothekcr- Vereines , 1880, p. 73. According to these later researches the activity of ergot would be due (1) to two acids, scle¬ rotic acid combined with lime and fuscosclerotic acid derived from the red colouring matter ; (2) to a very bitter alkaloid, picrosclerotine, probably occurring with fuscosclerotic acid in the colouring matter ; and (3) to a _ _ _ _ , . ^ _ _ _ _ * Bulletin de la Society de Pharmacie de Pordea ix, vol. xx., p. 40. nitrogenous matter of a gummy nature, scleromucin. Ergot contains T5 to 4 5 per cent, of sclerotic acid, and 2 to 3 per cent, of scleromucin, whilst it contains scarcely one part in a thousand of fuscosclerotic acid and picro¬ sclerotine. In the second rank come alkaloids of doubtful action, ergotine, ecboline, and ergotinine, combined with a vola¬ tile acid, ergotic acid, and colouring matters, selererythin, scleroiodin, scleroxanthin and sclerocrystallin. In the third rank occur the inert matters : 30 to 35 per cent, of fixed oil, 2 per cent, of resinous matter, 46 per cent, of cellulose, mycose, leucine, secaline, and ash very rich in phosphates. These analyses do not mention cholesterine, which Schoonbrodt, in 1866, and Ludwig, in 1869, found in ergot. They are especially the expression of the later work of Dragendorff and Podwissotzky and take very little account of other researches made since 1831. Let us pass in review the memoirs thus forgotten, commencing with those which relate to the ergotines. The ergotine of Wiggers, which is the oldest in a chronological point of view, is not an alkaloid. It is a complex extractive matter; nevertheless its elementary composition has been established by Liebig and Pelouze. It is obtained by first freeing ergot from its fixed oil by means of ether or carbon bisulphide, and then treating it with boiling alcohol. This alcoholic tincture is evapo¬ rated to dryness upon a water -bath, and the dry extract is exhausted with cold distilled water. The residue in¬ soluble in water is the ergotine of Wiggers, of which the yield is from 1 to T25 per cent. This ergotine is very toxic ; its action is therefore not uncertain, as is alleged by Dragendorff and Podwissotzky. It occurs under the form of a reddish-brown pulverulent extract, having an acrid and bitter taste. It is insoluble in water and ether ; it, therefore, contains neither sclerotic acid nor scleromu¬ cin, which are soluble in water, nor ergotine, which is soluble in ether. It is soluble in alcohol, to which it com¬ municates a red colour, and contains consequently the colouring matters mentioned above of fuscosclerotic acid and picrosclerotine. It is also soluble in concentrated acetic acid and in alkalies. In consequence of its method of preparation, its complex nature, and its badly defined therapeutic effects the ergotine of Wiggers has not been employed in medicine. This is not the case with another extractive product obtained from ergot, and to which M. Bonjean, of Cham- bery, has also given the name of ergotine. Bon jean’s ergotine is a true mixed extract. It is prepared by ex¬ hausting ergot with cold water, bringing the aqueous solution to the consistency of a clear syrup, and freeing this syrup by strong alcohol from insoluble salts, gummy matters and albuminoids. After filtration the filtered liquor is brought to the consistence of an extract. The preparation and the characters of this ergotine will be referred to subsequently; but from a chemical point of view it may be stated that this extract contains probably the sclerotic acid and a little of the scleromucin of Dragendorff, the secaline of Winckler, and the ergotine and ecoboline of Wenzell. This brings us to a third ergotine, the ergotine of Wenzell. This German chemist, studying in 1864 the aqueous extract of ergot, believed that he had discovered in it two alkaloids, ergotine and ecboline, the first slightly active, the second possessing the obstetrical properties of ergot and combined with a special acid, ergotic acid. Wenzell prepared these two alkaloids by heating the aqueous extract of ergot with acetate of lead, filtering, freeing the liquor from excess of lead salt, and afterwards adding corrosive sublimate, which precipitates the ecboline only. After separation of this alkaloid the ergotine is pre¬ cipitated by phosphomolybdic acid, the phosphomolybdate is then decomposed by carbonate of barium in the presence of water, and after filtration the liquid, containing the ergotine, is evaporated to dryness in a water-bath. Wen- zell’s ergotine has the appearance of brownish-black 24 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [July 10, 1880. shining varnish. It is soluble in water and in alcohol, but insoluble in ether. It is very slightly active, as has been mentioned ; ecboline, on the contrary, would repre¬ sent four times its weight of ergot. The study of these three products, so different in their mode of preparation and their physiological effects, shows that these ergotines are far from being clearly defined compounds. The ergotinine of M, Tanret appears to be a true alkaloid. This chemist first prepares an extract of ergot with boiling 80° alcohol, and from it he obtains by the successive actions of ether, chloroform, sulphuric acid, and alkalies, a body having a very feeble alkaline reaction, but possessing all the other properties of alkaloids. His process of preparation has been published in the Pharma¬ ceutical Journal, [3], vol. vi., p. 522 ; vol. ix., p. 70 7. Ergotinine is a crystallizable alkaloid. It is insoluble in water, and soluble in alcohol, ether, and chloroform. The alcoholic solution is very fluorescent. By the action of concentrated acids in the presence of traces of ether it gives rise to phenomena of coloration. Thus sulphuric acid added to one-seventh part of water causes it to become red, yellow, and then an intense violet blue. It forms with acids, especially sulphuric and lactic acids, well crystallized salts. Unfortunately it is very unstable, and is found in ergot in very small quantity, the maximum yield per kilogram being 1*20 gram of ergotine, of which only one -third crystallizes. Hence it would not be susceptible of every day use, although it might be a very powerful hemostatic in cases of uterine hemorrhage. I come now to the investigations of Dragendorff and Podwissotzky, who relegate the ergotines and ergotinine to the second rank, and attribute all the properties of ■ergot to two acids, a gummy matter, and an alkaloid very different according to them from ergotine and ergotinine. Sclerotic acid, obtained, like scleromucin, from the aqueous extract, is soluble in water, 45° alcohol and boiling 75° alcohol. It is a body with a, very energetic action, a subcutaneous injection of it rapidly causing paralysis in frogs, with swelling of the abdomen. Euscosclerotic acid is insoluble in water and in ether. It dissolves in acid menstrua, and is prepared by treating the colouring matter of ergot with alcohol acidulated with tartaric acid. It appears to act specially upon the sensibility, which it diminishes promptly. Scleromucin is a viscous colloidal matter, ■soluble in water and insoluble in alcohol. It is nitro¬ genous and very rich in mineral substances (26 "8 per cent.). Although very impure and badly defined it •appears to be the therapeutic agent of ergot. Piero - .sclerotine is a very bitter alkaloid, which is removed from the colouring matter at the same time as fusco- sclerotic acid. It is not soluble in acidulated water. This alkaloid is the most toxic agent in ergot. Injected in the dose of one milligram under the skin of a frog it produces at first insensibility, followed by paralysis of the extremities, and causes death in less than ten minutes. This rapid review of the different bodies that have been derived from ergot proves that we are not well acquainted with the active principle or principles of ergot. Not one of the bodies isolated, alkaloid or acid, gummy or colour¬ ing matter, can replace in therapeutics the drug itself, and it would appear that it only remains to admit with Bon jean and Buchheim, that ergot owes its medical properties to the whole of its chemical constitution. Consequently the medical man should always employ ergot in its natural state, powdered, and the powder should always be recently prepared. Under this form it could be rendered more active and probably less alterable by removing the 35 per cent, of fixed oil, by exhausting it, for example, with carbon bisulphide. For hypodermic injections choice should be made among the preparations soluble in water of that which would be at the same time the most active and the most stable, the ■easiest to prepare and the most apt to lend itself to dispensing. This choice is rendered easy by the small number of preparations in which these conditions are to be found. I can only mention three, the fluid ergotine of Portans, the liquid extract of Yvon, and the ergotine of Bonjean. I am not acquainted with experiments made with Portans’ ergotine, but can quote its mode of preparation, which whilst being convenient to any pharmacist, appears to be logical. The powdered ergot is macerated during eight days in a mixture of water, alcohol and glycerine. At the end of this time it is passed through a filter, and the filtered liquor freed from alcohol by distillation. The ergot remaining on the filter is then exhausted by dis¬ placement with water, and this aqueous solution is con¬ centrated in a water-bath to the consistence of an extract. The extract is then redissolved in the liquid from the first maceration, and this solution is concentrated in a water-bath in a tared capsule until the weight of the liquid equals the weight of the ergot employed, and then filtered. A fluid extract is thus obtained which represents its own weight of ergot. Yvon’s liquid extract is prepared also to represent its own weight of ergot, but the method is based upon the investigations of Wiggers, Wenzell, and Tanret in treat¬ ing the ergot with an acid menstruum. The ergot is pulverized, freed from fatty matters by carbon bisulphide, and then dried in the open air in the shade until all the odour has disappeared. It is next treated by displacement with water acidulated with four parts per thousand of tartaric acid, the acid liquid is heated to coagulate albuminoid matters, reduced in a water-bath to one third, allowed to cool and filtered. The filtered liquor is digested with freshly precipi¬ tated carbonate of lime, again filtered and brought to the consistence of a syrup, to which is added some 928 alcohol. The alcoholic liquid is filtered, decolorized by animal charcoal, again filtered, then submitted to distil¬ lation or evaporation to drive off the alcohol. Finally the residue is taken up with distilled water, 15 centi¬ grams of salicylic acid added for each 100 grams of ergot, and sufficient distilled water or cherry-laurel water to have 100 grams of liquid for each 100 grams of ergot. It is then allowed to deposit afresh, filtered and preserved in small well closed flasks. Yvon’s extract is a liquid having an amber colour and a peculiar odour ; it gives all the reactions of alkaloids. It lends itself well to the preparation of hypodermic injections and, according to the inventor, keeps well. The product is open, however, to the objection of want of homogeneity, its activity varying exactly with that of the ergot, and so especially is the long and unpractical mode of preparation. Yvon’s process is a laboratory process, which could never be followed in the ordinary course in pharmacies, especially in country plaoes. Bon jean’s ergotine is therefore the preparation to which recourse should be had in the majority of cases, it being, when well prepared, a valuable and reliable remedy. The preparation of this extract not being men¬ tioned in the Codex has been dealt with rather arbitrarily. Few extracts have been so much studied during recent years, but it will suffice to mention the memoirs of Deschamps, Dorvault, Carles, Lepage, Patrouillard and Catillon. I prefer to all the processes indicated that of Bonjean, modified in the direction indicated by Lepage and the Bordeaux Society of Pharmacy. Taking a kilogram of ergot, for example (fresh and undried, if this be possible), it is reduced to a coarse powder and placed in a bottle of five litres capacity ; the bottle is filled with distilled water, closed and shaken frequently. At the end of twenty-four hours, after allowing it to deposit during the night, the liquid is decanted or siphoned, and its evaporation commenced in a tared vessel in a water-bath. The bottle is refilled with distilled water and again shaken ; then, after a maceration of six hours, the liquor is decanted and added to the previous product. Another litre of water is added to the ergot and left in contact during two hours, then the whole is thrown on a strainer and pressed. The July 10, 1880.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 25 third liquor is added to the other two and the whole is evaporated rapidly until reduced to about 500 grams. It is now allowed to cool to 50° C. and poured into a litre flask; the dish is rinsed with a little 92° alcohol, which is added to the other liquid and the flask is com¬ pletely filled with strong alcohol, after which it is closed, shaken and placed in a cool place. After twenty-four hours the liquid is filtered through paper and the filtrate is evaporated in a water-bath to the consistence of a firm extract. A yield of about 8 per cent, of ergotine is thus obtained. This ergotine is of a red-brown colour and has a smel like that of roast meat ; its taste is bitter and piquant. It contains 10 per cent, of water and leaves 6 per cent, of salts upon incineration. It dissolves nearly completely in water, and this solution is facilitated by first suspend¬ ing the extract in a little glycerine. It is soluble in 60° alcohol. It will have been noticed that I employ the method of Cadet, which I prefer, with M. Patrouillard, to the method of displacement. I have not obtained a larger yield ; never 12 to 15 per cent., and upon this point I am in complete accord with M. Carles. I have also operated as recommended by M. Catillon, by first making an alcoholic extract and then taking up the extract with water. The displacement with alcohol is much more methodical and regular, but I have not obtained a larger yield than by the process mentioned before when ope¬ rating with the same kind of ergot. I would mention, however, that these parallel experiments were made with small quantities. But nevertheless, in presence of this result it seems preferable to retain the process of Bon jean ; the product is more homogeneous and more comparable to the ergotines found in all pharmacies, which is a great advantage to the physician and the patient. Ergotine should be preserved in well closed flasks. It should never be used too old ; there would therefore be an advantage in preparing it every year or every two y6ars at least. After a time it forms crystalline deposits of a salt which, according to Fliickiger, is an acid phos¬ phate of sodium and magnesium, with a little sulphate. For hypodermic injections ergotine is used in doses of 1 to 2 grams, dissolved in distilled water, cherry-laurel water, or a mixture of distilled water and glycerine, the precaution being taken to first suspend the ergotine in the glycerine, adding the water and filtering through moistened paper to obtain very clear solutions. These solutions are made sometimes 1 in 5 (Dr. Vidal), some¬ times 1 in 10 or 1 in 15 (Dr. Bucquoy and Dr. Moutard- Martin) . Subcutaneous injections of ergotine are occasionally painful, either when a badly prepared alcoholic extract or a solution slightly alcoholic has been used, or an ergotine containing lactic acid, due, according to Bach- heim, to the lactic fermentation of the mycose. The conclusions from a chemical and pharmaceutical point of view are easily deduced. When the medical man can, he should administer the pulverized ergot, were it even in suspension in a julep, and that in preference to all the ergotines. For hypodermic injections he should use for the present the ergotine of Bon jean. THE SAPPHIRE MINES OF SIAM. The Commercial Report by the Acting British Consul- General in Siam for the year 1879 contains the following interesting information upon this subject : — The year 1879 will long be memorable in the provinces of Battambong and Chantaboon for the discovery of valuable sapphire mines and for the great influx of foreigners, chiefly from British and Independent Burmah, to work the same. There have long been mines of inferior value in this neighbourhood, and about five years ago new mines were discovered by a native hunter. Being, however, in a very remote and secluded position, it was some time before the fame of the new mines spread o the Burman and Indian gem traders and miners. Some individual diggers, however, having found their way to the mines, and having returned to Rangoon and Calcutta with the proceeds of their work, realized very large sums, and a rush for the new mines commenced and continued throughout the last year, during which many thousands of British subjects passed through Bangkok from British Burmah on their way to the mines. The arrival of these large bands of armed strangers caused considerable alarm among the natives of Chanta¬ boon and Battambong, who could scarcely be persuaded that the country was not invaded once more by the old hereditary enemies of Siam, the Burmans and Peguans. The miners, however, by their peaceable behaviour restored confidence, and the country people soon were glad to sell them all kinds of provisions at enhanced rates. The miners, in their haste to become rich, disregarded all considerations of health, and immense numbers died from jungle fever. The Toung-thoos from Pegu proved the most capable of standing the climate, and, many having made money and returned successful to their homes, the rush continued unabated for a long time ; but now the great mortality is beginning to tell, and the broken health and emaciated appearance of most of those who return, will check the eagerness of others to try their fortunes in this fever-stricken district. The governor of the province has hitherto levied 2£ ticals (5s. 7 %d.) from every man working at the mines, and this is cheerfully paid. Good order has hitherto, I am happy to say, been main¬ tained, and the governor has appointed a British subject named Kam Sai to act as headman and to collect the licence duty. The Siamese authorities do not regard with entire complacency this conveyance from their soil of these valuable gems without the payment of any royalty. Na definite proposition has, however, yet been made to impose any other than the licence tax above mentioned. There would probably be found considerable difficulty in collecting any sort of ad valorem duty. As it is, the discovery of the most valuable stones is kept as secret as possible by the fortunate finders, and should any ad valorem duty be attempted to be imposed, the tax-gatherer would probably be defeated by craft or force. When Admiral Coote was here, I was anxious to show him some good specimens of these sapphires, and called for some of the miners who were in Bangkok on their return from the diggings. One of them, a poorly clad and miserable looking individual, produced a few small stones, and, after a great deal of coaxing, was induced with many precautions to give us a private view of his great prize, which was a very large sapphire in the rough, which he valued at 20,000 rupees. He would probably not have shown this stone at all had he not been on the point of leaving in a steamer. Owing to the secrecy thus observed by the possessors of valuable gems, it is impossible to give any estimate of the total value of stones found, but that individuals have made very large profits is certain. There is a man now in Bangkok who dug out a stone which he offered for sale in Chantaboon at 1000 rupees, but did not find a jurchaser. He went with it to Rangoon, where he was offered 15,000 rupees ; but, having then awoke to the value of the stone, he declined to sell and took it to Calcutta,, where he eventually obtained 30,000 rupees for it. Now, however, there are many experienced gem mer¬ chants established in the neighbourhood of the mines, and something like the real value of the stones can be obtained by the miners on the spot. Many of the miners finding themselves in cash have invested in the luxury of wives taken from the Siamese population, and the value of marriageable young women, who are at all good looking, has in consequence gone up to a very high figure. The largest sapphire hitherto found, which I know of. 26 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [July 10, 1SS0. weighed 370 carats in the rough, and when cut turned nut 111 carats of the finest water. The ruby, onyx, and jade are also found in tbe district, but the quality of none of these is such as to make them very valuable. CHESTNUT LEAVES* BY LEWIS JOSEPH STELTZER, PH.G. Chestnut leaves should be gathered for medicinal use in the months of September and October, while still green ; they possess a faint characteristic odour. When gathered in the early part of October they lose in drying 49 per cent, of their weight, retaining most of their green colour, except the midrib, which changes to brown. They do not become brittle, and are, therefore, with difficulty reduced to powder. * The leaves contain a considerable amount of tannin and extractive matter. The powder cannot be percolated alone on account of swelling when water or alcohol is added. A fluid extract is made by repeatedly digesting the leaves in water and expressing the juice, adding- glycerin and sugar and evaporating, as recommended by Professor J. M. Maisch ( American journal of Pharmacy, December, 1871). A tincture made in the proportion of two ounces of the leaves to a pint of diluted alcohol is also frequently used. Chtstnut leaves were first brought to the notice Sf the medical profession by Mr. George C. Close, in the year 1862, but were used by some physicians and in domestic practice previous to that time. They have been'~used with good success as a remedy for whooping cofigh; appear to control the spasms and often cause their 'Sus¬ pension in a few days. The fluid extract is probably the best preparation to use, as it contains the drug in a con¬ centrated form and is not unpleasant to take. The tincture may also be used, but the objection to it is the large dose required and the amount of alcohol contained therein. For the purpose of ascertaining some of the con¬ stituents of the leaves they were subject to the following experiments : — The infusion possessed an astringent taste, producing with ferric chloride a greenish-black precipitate, and a copious precipitate with solution of gelatin, showing the presence of tannin. The infusion was deprived of colour¬ ing matter, tannin, etc., with solution of subacetate of lead, filtering and separating lead with sulpliydric acid. The liquid appears to be free from sugar. Tbe cold in¬ fusion showed the presence of albumen when heated, and by the precipitate produced with solution of mercuric ehloi-ide. Alcohol precipitated gum, soluble in excess of water, and this solution was not precipitated with fe. ric chloride or sodium borate. Ten grams of the ground leaves were boiled with suc¬ cessive portions of water until the soluble parts were all dissolved, the different solutions mixed, filtered and treated with solution of gelatin until it ceased to afford a precipitate. This was separated by filtration, washed, dried and weighed; the result was T70 gram, equal to about 0-9 gram of tannin. A repetition of this experi¬ ment gave nearly the same result. This experiment shows 9 per cent, of tannin present in chestnut leaves. After removing the tannin from the infusion by means of fresh hide the filtrate was not affected by ferric chlo¬ ride, and was, therefore, free from gallic acid. The alcoholic tincture possessed a dark green colour by reflected light and brown colour by transmitted light. Upon evaporation a dark green extract was obtained. Its solution in water, in which it is slightly soluble, gives a black precipitate with ferric chloride. A portion of the tincture was evaporated to a small bulk, thrown upon water and the insoluble portion filtered out, again dis¬ solved in alcohol and treated with animal charcoal ; when filtered the solution was colourless, and left no residue * From the American Journal of Pharmacy, June, 1880. when evaporated. The solution of the extract in chloro¬ form, when treated with purified animal charcoal, filtered and evaporated, left a small quantity of a soft, yellowish substance, probably resin. By the treatment of the leaves with petroleum benzin and evaporating a quantity of fatty matter is obtained, freely soluble in ether. Negative results were obtained when examining for an alkaloid or volatile oil. One hektogram of the dried leaves was incinerated; 5- 40 grams of ash of a light grey colour was obtained, having an alkaline reaction. Appropriate tests indicated the presence of carbonates, chlorides and phosphates of potassium, calcium, magne¬ sium and iron, while the organic constituents of the leaves are tannin (9 per cent.), gum, albumen, resin (a trace), fat, extractive and lignin. RESIN AND TURPENTINE.* The following account of the mode of production of resin and turpentine on the south-eastern coast of the United States is taken from an American paper : — “From Wilmington, N.C., southward, and nearly all the way to Florida, the pitch pine trees, with their blazed sides, attract the attention of the traveller. Tbe lands for long stretches are almost worthless, and the only industry, beyond small patches for corn or cotton, is the ‘ boxing ’ of the pitch pine trees for the gum, as it is called, and the manufacture of turpentine and resin. There are several kinds of pine trees, including the white, spruce, yellow, Roumany and pitch pine. The latter is the only valuable one for boxing, and differs a little from the yellow pine, with which it is sometimes confounded in the north. The owners of these pine lands generally lease the ‘ privilege ’ for the business, and receive about 125 dollars for a ‘ crop,’ which consists of 10,000 1 boxes.’ The boxes are cavities cut into the tree near the ground in such a way as to hold about a quart, and from one to four boxes are cut in each tree, the number depending upon its size. One man can attend to and gather the crop of 10,000 boxes during the season, which lasts from March to September. About three quarts of pitch or gum is the average production of each box, but to secure this amount the bark of the tree above the box must be hacked away a little every fortnight. Doing this so often, and for successive seasons, removes the bark as high as can be easily reached, while the quality of the gum constantly decreases, in that it yields less spirit, as the turpentine is called, and then the trees are aban¬ doned. The gum is scraped out of the boxes with a sort of wooden spoon, and at the close of the season, after the pitch on the exposed surface of the tree has become hard, it is removed by scraping, and is only good for resin, as it produces no spirit. The gum sells for 1 50 dollar a barrel to the distillers. From 16 barrels of the crude gum, which is about the average capacity of the stills, 80 gallons of turpentine and 10 barrels of resin are made. The resin sells for from 1*40 dollar to 5 dollars per barrel, according to quality, and about pajs for cost of gum and distilling, leaving the spirit, which sells for 40 cents a gallon, as the profit of the business. Immense quantities of resin await shipment at the stations along the line, and the pleasant odour enters the car windows as we are whirled along. After the trees are unfit for further boxing, and are not suitable for lumber, they are sometimes used to manufacture tar ; but the business is not very profitable, and is only done by large companies, who can thus use their surplus labour. The trees are cut up into wood, which is piled in a hole in the ground and covered with earth and then burned the same as charcoal is burned elsewhere. The heat sweats out the gum, which, uniting with the smoke, runs off through a spout provided for the purpose. A cord of wood will make two barrels of tar, which sells for 1 '50 dollars per barrel and costs 37^ cents to make. The charcoal is then sold for cooking purposes.” * From the Journal of the Society of Arts, June 4, 1880. July 10, 1880.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 27 (TIk ^Ibarmnccutital |ounml. - ♦ - SATURDAY, JULY 10, 1880. Communications for the Editorial department of this Journal , books for review , etc., should be addressed to the Editor, 17, Bloomsbury Square. Instructions from Members and Associates respecting the transmission of the Journal should be sent to Mr. Elias Bremridge, Secretary , 17, Bloomsbury Square , W.C. Advertisements, and payments for Copies of the Journal , Messrs. Churchill, New Burlington Street, London, W. Envelopes indorsed “ Pharm. Journ .” THE TESTING OF COMMERCIAL QUININE SULPHATE. The vast importance of quinine as a remedial agent, surpassing as it does that of almost all other medicines, is now so generally acknowledged that it is not surprising to find considerable attention directed to the means by which the purity of the salt most frequently met is to be ascertained. Some years ago there was published in this Journal a description of a method for testing sulphate of quinine devised by Dr. G. Kerner, and based upon the differences existing between the solubilities of the sulphates of cinchona alkaloids in water and between the solu¬ bilities of the several alkaloids in dilute solution of ammonia. That method of testing was a great improvement upon the test recommended by Zimmer and Liebig, based upon the differences in the solubility of quinine and other cinchona alkaloids in ether ; it was on that account adopted in the German Phar¬ macopoeia, but has not yet received further official recognition. The consequence lias been that the results obtained in testing sulphate of quinine as to purity have not always been of such a nature as to decide the question satisfactorily or at all, and it is somewhat notorious that sulphate of quinine has very frequently contained such an amount of cin- chonidine sulphate as to be very far from entitled to rank as a pure preparation. That this should be the case is to a great extent intelligible from the circumstance that of late years it is said there has been in the manufacture of quinine a much larger use of those varieties of cinchona bark that contain considerable amounts of cinchonidine. Three years ago attention was directed to this subject at an Evening Meeting of the Pharmaceutical Society, and it was shown that several commercial samples of quinine sulphate contained from 5 to 10 per cent, of cinchonidine sulphate. It was also shown that the indications furnished by the test directed in the British Pharmacopoeia were not such as to give evidence of this impurity, and that there was really no difference between the result obtained in testing such samples and that obtained in testing really pure quinine sulphate. At that time it was suggested that a test based partly upon the different solubilities of the sulphates of quinine and cin- clionidine in water and partly upon the different solubilities of the corresponding alkaloids in ether, would be more useful for ascertaining the purity of quinine sulphate than either the test of the British Pharmacopoeia or even that introduced years before by Dr. Kerner. Somewhat later almost exactly the same mode of testing quinine sulphate was recommended by Dr. Hesse, who described a form of apparatus in which the operation was to be con¬ ducted and laid down rules by which some approxi¬ mative estimate might be formed as to the amount of impurity present in the quinine sulphate operated upon. It is in regard to this point that there is the greatest difficulty in obtaining trustworthy results by any of the known methods of testing quinine sul¬ phate. Even with Kerner’s test applied volume- trically the results obtained are liable to vary under the influence of slight differences of the conditions of experiment, and at the time when that test was introduced the knowledge of the alkaloids associated with quinine was sufficiently imperfect to give rise to additional uncertainty ; now, however, it may be taken as certain that in almost every case the im¬ purity met with in commercial quinine sulphate is nothing more nor less than cinchonidine sulphate. The great solubility of cinchonine sulphate as compared with quinine sulphate is alone almost a guarantee that it cannot be present in a well prepared sample of quinine sulphate. As regards quinidine, again, the probability of its occurrence is very slight, for it must be remembered that there are but few kinds of cinchona bark which contain so much quinidine that its sulphate is likely to remain mixed with recrys¬ tallized quinine, sulphate. Quite recently, another paper on the subject lias been published by Dr. Kerner, in which he specially refers to the misconceptions and errors which he thinks have arisen from Dr. Hesse’s recommendation of a method for judging as to the quality of commercial quinine sulphate, and in justification of this view he instances the statement in a paper by Dr. Schacht, of Berlin, that a certain sample of quinine sulphate, tested as Dr. Hesse directs, gave a result showing that it contained “ at least 3 per cent, of cinchonidine sulphate.” He there mentions having long ago made use of the method recommended by Dr. Hesse, and based essentially upon the fact that cinchonine, quinidine and cinchonidine dissolve less readily in ether and separate from the ethereal solution more quickly when they are associated with very little or no quinine; but he adds that his experience at that time led him to regard this mode of testing as not being practical and trustworthy enough for its adoption as an official quinine test. He gives several reasons which lead him to infer that quantitaiive estimations according to the time the appearance of crystals in tire ether solution takes place are altogether pre¬ carious and untrustworthy, and then goes on to state 28 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [July 10, 18S0. that the ammonia test carefully applied is so much more safe and delicate that it will admit of approxi¬ mate determination of the impurities in commercial quinine sulphate, besides giving positive evidence of purity in the case of samples that are free from associated alkaloids. We propose publishing in an early number of this Journal a resume of the directions given by Dr. Kerner for applying the ammonia test in order to ascertain the character of commercial quinine sul¬ phate, and also for the purpose of determining more precisely the actual quantities of impurity present, and will now only mention one other point which he deals with, viz., the amount of water in the quinine sulphate of trade. It is well known that this salt normally contains a considerable amount of water of crystallization, and that this water is readily lost by efflorescence. Besides this, the voluminous char¬ acter of the salt enables it to hold mechanically a variable excess of water to such an extent, as Dr. Kerner states, that apparently dry samples may be met with containing as much as 18 per cent, of water. It is also stated that such a result is not unfrequently brought about by devices of the manu¬ facturer and by intentional moistening of the salt after it has passed from his hands into commerce. Dr. Kerner suggests that the best remedy for this state of things would be to substitute the hydro¬ chlorate in place of the sulphate, inasmuch as it is a more constant salt, and it has been found to possess advantages from a therapeutical point of view. Still, since quinine sulphate is the official prepa¬ ration and the one in general use, the question as to the amount of water in a sample is, as Dr. Kerner insists, one of importance as regards the determina¬ tion of relative value of that sample ; but at the same time he points out that it is not easy to decide what may reasonably be required in this respect, and that it is still less easy to determine quickly the amount of water in a sample of quinine sulphate than it is to detect minute traces of cinchonidine not indicated by the ammonia test. In most manuals of chemistry the neutral quinine sulphate is represented by the for¬ mula 2(C20H24N2O2)H2SO4 + 7H2O, according to which the percentage amount of water would be 14*45. Dr. Hesse adopts formulae with 71> and even 8 molecules of water, but Dr. Kerner has invariably found the loss of weight by drying at 115° C. to vary between 14*38 and 14*80 per cent, when the fresh salt pressed between blotting paper and pro¬ tected from efflorescence was operated upon. Con¬ sequently, he adopts the corresponding formula as correct, and as he considers it is impracticable in factory operations to prevent efflorescence altogether, while thoroughly removing all mechanically adherent water, he concludes that it must be regarded as a well founded requirement that official quinine sul¬ phate should not at the utmost lose more than 14*6 per cent, of its weight when dried at 115° C. As a general rule he considers the loss of weight in good samples would be only 13*8 to 14*4 per cent. By exposure to dry air at a moderate temperature the crystallized quinine sulphate gradually loses five molecules of water, or 10*32 per cent., forming the compound 2(C20H24N2O2)H2SO4 + 2H2O, containing 4*6 per cent, water and 82*8(5 per cent, dry alkaloid. This salt is heavier than the above mentioned salt with seven molecules of water, and it has not so good an appearance, but it is constant, and though it can be thoroughly deprived of water of crystallization* even by drying at 100° C., the anhydrous salt, 2(C20H21N2O2)H2SO4, containing 86*86 per cent, of alkaloid, is so hygroscopic that it again attracts from the atmosphere two molecules of water more or less rapidly according to the humidity of the air. Consideration of these facts leads Dr. Kerner to suggest that the constant salt with two molecules of water should be made official, with the view of pre¬ venting improper introduction of water or loss to druggists by efflorescence, and of ensuring the ad¬ ministration of quinine in precisely the doses desired. Meanwhile, however, he recommends the practice of making a determination of the amount of water an element in the valuation of commercial quinine sulphate, as being more important than the testing for such traces of cinchonidine as fail to be indicated by the ammonia test. We share this view of the desirability of taking the percentage of water into account in testing quinine sulphate more thoroughly than we do that which gives a preference to the ammonia test, and are dis¬ posed to think that the modification of that test in which ether is used to ascertain the solubility of the alkaloid remaining in solution as sulphate after recrystallizing the sample in question from water will furnish a more intelligible result than any other we know of. The quantitative determination of the amount of impurity is, however, a matter requiring some considerable skill in analytical operations, and as regards anything less than 1 per cent, it may in general be dispensed with altogether for all practical purposes. MR. CYRUS BUOTT. Many of our readers will have noticed in the last * number, on page 20, a fresh appeal on behalf of Mr. Cyrus Buott. The fact that this gentleman “has lived to the age of eighty years to find himself worsted in the struggle for existence” will be in itself a strong plea with the generous, and especially there must be many gentlemen who were associated with Mr. Buott in the work of the United Society who will be glad of the opportunity of sending a contribution towards his aid now that he is in distress to Mr. Hamtson, 205, St. John Street Road, E.O. SCHOOL OF PHARMACY STUDENTS’ ASSOCIATION. The annual meeting of the above Association will be held on Thursday, the 15th inst., at 8*30 p.m., when the chair will be occupied by the President, Professor Attfield, F.R.S., and the Annual Report of the Executive Committee will be read. The Lord Chancellor has been pleased to place the name of Mr. S. R. Atkins, pharmaceutical chemist and member of the Council of the Pharma¬ ceutical Society, on the Commission of the Peace for city of Salisbury. * See Cownley “On the Water of Crystallization in Quinine Sulphate,” Fliarm. Jo urn ., [3J, vii., p. 18‘J. July 10, 1880.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 29 Cransarthms of % ^Ijjarmaceuticat MEETING OF THE COUNCIL. Wednesday , July 7, 1880. MR. THOMAS GREENISH, PRESIDENT. MR. GEORGE FREDERICK SCHACIIT, VICE-PRESIDENT. Present — Messrs. Andrews, Atkins, Bottle, Churchill, Frazer, Gostling, Hampson, HilL, Maclcay, Radley, Richardson, Robbins, Sandford, Savage, Symes, Williams and Woolley. The minutes of the previous meeting were read and confirmed. Mr. Mackay presented, in the name of Professor Archer, a small box containing rare specimens of Indian attars. 1 The President moved a vote of thanks to Professor Archer, which was carried unanimously. The Sessional Address. The Secretary read a letter he had received from Dr. Langdon Down, expressing his willingness to undertake the duty of delivering the Sessional Address in October next, in accordance with the request of the Council. Resignation of Mr. Shaw. The President reported that he had received a letter from Mr. Shaw, stating that he found he should not be able to attend the Council regularly during the present year, and he therefore begged to place bis resignation in the hands of the President. In taking leave of his col¬ leagues, he desired to express his high sense of the kind¬ ness which he had received at their hands during the nine years he had held office. The President said he had written to Mr. Shaw, asking him to reconsider the matter, but Mr. Shaw could not see his way to do so. He was sure they would all agree with him that it was a source of regret that they should lose so able and zealous a member as Mr. Shaw. Mr. Sandford having had much intercourse with Mr. Shaw all the time he had been a member of the Council, felt sure the Council would agree with him that a vote of thanks was due to Mr. Shaw for his services on the Council, together with an expression of regret that he should have found it necessary to re ign. Mr. Mackay begged to second the motion, which he did with the greater heartiness because Mr. Shaw was known to the members of the North British Branch before he became a member of the Council. In the early days of the Society’s existence in Edinburgh Mr. Shaw was in business there, and devoted a great deal of time and attention to the interests of the Society. He there¬ fore shared very deeply the regret which had been expressed at Mr. Shaw’s resignation. Mr. Hampson also felt that the retirement of Mr. Shaw was a loss to the Council and to the trade. He well reflected general broad views on trade matters and was a very conscientious and zealous member of the Council. Mr. Symes having also supported the motion, it was carried unanimously. The President stated that, in accordance with the bye-laws, the Council would have next mouth to fill up the vacancy caused by Mr. Shaw’s retirement. The following, being duly registered as Pharmaceutical Chemists, were respectively granted a diploma stamped with the seal of the Society: — Chapman, Joseph George. Evans, John. Holmes, William Albert. Jones, William. Elections. MEMBERS. Pharmaceutical Chemists. The following, having passed the Major examination and tendered their subscriptions for the current vear, were elected “ Members ” of the Societ}- : — Chapman, Joseph George . Binfield. Holmes, William Albert . Kendal. Chemists and Druggists. The following registered chemists and druggists, who were in business on their own account before August 1st. 1868, having tendered their subscriptions for the current year, were elected u Members ” of the Society : — Davies, Elias Kossuth . Bethesda. Patchitt, Edwin Cheshire . Nottingham. Pattison, Henry . Shrewsbury. ASSOCIATES IN BUSINESS. The following, having passed the Minor examination, being in business on their own account, and bavin tendered their subscriptions for the current year, wei elected “ Associates in Business ” of the Society : — Boyd, Samuel . Annan. Coleman, Edward . Tam worth. Currie, William Little . Glasgow. Fox, Alfred . Hull. Griffith, Philip . Burnham, Somerset. James, Thomas Cragg . Birkenhead. Porter, John Thomas . Coalville. Welford, Richard . Blackburn. Wright, Eli . . . . Bi rmingham. ASSOCIATES. The following, having passed the Minor examination, and tendered (or paid, as Apprentices or Students) their subscriptions for the current year, were elected “Asso¬ ciates” of the Society: — Barnett, John Arthur . Salisbury. Dickinson, David . . Boston. Dodd, William Ralph . Market Drayton. Francis, Matthew Robert . London. Jackson, Henry Lawson . Crediton. .T ackson, William Hodgkinson . . . Crediton. Mason, Joseph Robert . Workington. Moore, Jonathan Reuben . Kettering. Slicer, Walter . Bingley. Trible, Edward . Launceston. APPRENTICES OR STUDENTS. The following, having passed the Preliminary exami¬ nation and tendered their subscriptions for the current year, were elected “ Apprentices or Students ” of the Society : — Austen, Charles Wilson . Surbiton. Blarney, Edward Parr . Hayle. Crowther, Horace Wood ward... West Bromwich. Garnett, James . Kendal. Hopkins, John Henry . Leicester. McKenzie, James . Macduff. Morrison, John Wm. Thomas... London. Parsons, Thomas . Bourton-on-the-Water. Richmond, Paul Henry . Wigton. Stevens, Walter Rowland . Wye. Thomas, Joseph Arden . Cambridge. Ward, Robert Edward . Kettering. Wheeler, William Robert . Fant Holme. Woods, William Herbert . Plymouth. Woolley, Evan Edward . Llanidloes. Several persons were restored to their former status in the Society upon payment of the current year’s sub¬ scription and a fine. 6 aq 30 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [July 10, 1S80. Restoration to the Register. The name of the following person, who had made the required declaration and paid a fine of one guinea, was restored to the Register of Chemists and Druggists : — Henry Matthew Roberton, 11, East Street, Walworth, Surrey. Additions to the Register. The Registrar reported that — Wallett James Burgess, Great Northern Hospital, Cale¬ donian Road, London, N ., Joseph Cook, Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derby, Joseph Robinson Lund, 81,Barkerend Road, Bradford, Yorks, and George Murrell, 36, High Street, Winchester, having made statutory declarations that they were in business before the passing of the Pharmacy Act, 1868, and these declarations having beeu supported by duly qualified medical practitioners, their names had been placed on the Register. Reports of Committees. The report and recommendations were unanimously received and adopted. The Sale of Patent Medicines containing Poisons. The Council then went into Committee to consider a communication from the Privy Council, relative to the sale of patent medicines containing poisons. After some discussion, a draft letter to be sent in reply was agreed to by the Council, and ordered to be sent to the Privy Council. Reports of Committees ( continued ). LIBRARY, MUSEUM AND LABORATORY. The Professors had attended and reported on their re¬ spective classes. Professor Redwood had submitted specimen copies of the ‘ Historical Sketch of Pharmacy.’ The Librarian’s report had been received, and included the following particulars : — May . Attendance. | Day . * ( Evening Total. Highest. Lowest. Average. 288 18 3 12 nearly. 130 12 3 7 FINANCE. The report of this Committee was received and adopted, and sundry accounts were ordered to be paid. The accounts included a large item for law costs, and in con¬ nection with this matter the President stated that he had received a communication from the Solicitor, saying that he had retained Mr. Benjamin, Q.C., in addition to the counsel previously engaged in the case, for the appeal in the House of Lords. BENEVOLENT FUND. Mr. Symes sugge.-ted that time might be saved if the details of cases were not read to the Council. The President thought it very desirable that the details should be read, in order that those who did not attend the Committee might know what was being done. Mr. Richardson supported the view of Mr. Symes. He thought the Council had full confidence in the Com¬ mittee. Mr. Williams suggested that if this question were to be raised, a notice of motion should be given, to which Mr. Symes assented, and the reading of the minutes was then proceeded with. The report included a recommendation of_the following grants : — £15 to a registered chemist and druggistjmd former member, age 73. £5 to a registered chemist and druggist, aged 71, who has had two previous grants of £10 each. £10 to a registered chemist and druggist Jand associate, suffering from illness. £10 to the widow of a registered chemist and druggist. £20 to the widow of a member, to assist her in fur¬ nishing her house for the purpose of letting lodgings. £10 to the widow of a registered chemist and druggist. £10 to the widow of a chemist and druggist. £5 to the widow of a registered chemist and druggist, who had a grant of £10 in September last. £10 to the widow of a life member, who has had two previous grants of £20. £10 to a registered chemist and druggist, who has had several previous grants. £10 to a female registered chemist and druggist. £10 to one of the unsuccessful candidates for an annuity at the last election. With regal’d to a provisional grant of thirty guineas made in November last, to assist in the election of an orphan to an asylum, the Secretary reported that he had attended the election, but had not found it necessary to expend any of the money, the child being elected without such expenditure. One or two cases had been deferred for further in¬ quiries, and in two cases the Committee had not enter¬ tained the applications. Circulation of books. Town. Country. Total. No. of entries . . . 164 87 251 Carriage paid . . . . £1 12s. 2d. The following donations to the Library had been reported, and the Committee recommended that the usual letter of thanks be sent to the respective donors : — Blancliet, C., Du Thapsia garganica, 1880. Trupheme, V., Premieres dtudes sur l’Erythroxlyon coca, 1879. From Professor J. Li5on Soubeiran ? Philadelphia College of Pharmacy, Annual Report of the Alumni Association, 1879-80. From the President of the Association. Ambition’s Dream, in two fyttes, new ed., 1879. [Anonymous.'] From the Author. Hielbig, C., Kritische Beurtheilung der Methoden welche zur Trennung und quantitativen Bestim- mung der verschiedenen Chinaalkaloide benutzt werden, 1880. Lehmann, A., Vergleichende Untersuchungen einiger Catechu- und Gambir-Proben nebst kritischer Beleuchtung der Methoden zur Bestimmung ihres Handelswerthes, 1880. From Professor Dragendorff. Hoadly, B., Three Lectures on the Organs of Respi¬ ration, 1740. Leake, J., Lecture introductory to the Theory and Practice of Midwifery, 3rd ed. [1776]. — Syllabus of Lectures on Midwifery, 1776. — Description and Use of a New Forceps, [1775]. — Vindication of Forceps, 1774. Keill, J., Essays on several parts of the Animal (Economy, 2nd ed., 1717. Morley, J., Essay on the Nature and Cure of Scrophulous Disorders, [with description and] co¬ loured plate of vervain, [25th ed.,] 1787. Quincy, J., Lexicon Physico-Medicum, or, New Physical Dictionary, 2nd ed., 1722. — Prselectiones Pharmaceutics, or, Course of Lectures in Pharmacy, 1723. Read, [A.,] Chirurgorum Comes, or, Whole Practice of Chyrurgery, 1687. Salmon, W., Synopsis Medicinse, or, Compendium of Physiclc, 3rd ed., 1695. Sydenham, T., Whole Works, translated by J. Pechy, 1696. Withering, W., Account of the Foxglove and some of its Medical Uses, 1785. From Mr. Benjamin Heald. Flora of British India, by Sir J. D. Hooker, etc., [pt. 7, 1880]. ' From H.M. Secretary of State for India. Annuaire des Spdcialit^s M&licales et Pharmaceu- tiques, 1880. From the Editors ? July 10, 1880], THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 31 The Committee recommended the purchase of the undermentioned works for the Library: — Chemist’s Journal, The. Corfield, W. H., Health, 1880. Dickson, J., Fasciculi Plantarum Cryptogamicarum Britannise, 1785-1801. Ekin, C., Potable Water, 1880. Ferrand, E., Aide-Memoire de Pharmacie, 2me ed , 1880. Freind, J., Chymical Lectures, 2nd ed., 1729. Gordon, J. E. H., Physical Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, 1880. 2 vols. Kingzett, C. T., Nature’s Hygiene, 1880. Latham, H., On the Action of Examinations, 1877. Luff, A. P., Introduction to the Study of Chemistry, 1880. Pavy, F. W., Treatise on Food and Dietetics, 2nd ed., 1875. Prantl, K., Elementary Text-Book of Botany, trans¬ lated by S. H. Vines, 1880. Ringer, S., Handbook of Therapeutics, 8th ed., 1880. Tyndall, J., Heat a Mode of Motion, 6th ed., 1880. Valentin, W. G., Course of Qualitative Chemical Analysis, 5th ed., 1880. The Librarian had laid before the Committee copies of the new edition of the Catalogue of the Library. He had also expressed his appreciation of the aid he had derived in its compilation from the rules for cataloguing adopted or proposed by the Library Associations, and from those prepared by Mr. Cutter. The Committee recommended that a copy of the Library Catalogue be forwarded to each of the provincial associations and to various public institutions and libraries. The Committee recommended that the Library and Museum be closed in the evening during August and September. The Curator’s report had been received, and included the following particulars : — Total. Highest. Lowest. Average. Attendance ( Day . . 314 20 4 10 during April, j Evening 64 8 1 2 Total. Highest. Lowest. Average. During ( Day . . 170 14 2 8 May. | Evening 29 4 1 2 The following donations to the Museum had been re¬ ceived, and the Committee recommended that the usual letter of thanks be sent to the respective donors : — Specimen of Bloodwood Gum ( Eucalyptus corym¬ bose/,). From Mr. T. B. Groves, Weymouth. Specimens of Cyperus bulbosus, Anchanchah seed, True Zedoary Root ( Kachoora ), Yellow Zedoary Root (Amba Hulda), and the root of Zingiber Cassumunar. From Dr. Dymock, Bombay. Specimens of Valeriana Hardxoickii. From Mr. A. W. Gerrard. Specimen of the Fruit of Liquidarnbar Formosana. From the Director of the Royal Gardens, Kew. Specimen of the Seeds of Brucea Sumatrcina. From Dr. De Vrij. Specimens of Boiari Root. From Professor Davidson, Aberdeen. Specimens of the barks of Cinchona Calisaya , C. succirubra and C. officinalis, from Jamaica, and fine quills of the bark of C. Ledgeriana, from Java. From Mr. Thos. Whiffen. Specimens of the following chemicals, etc., from the recent Pharmaceutical Exhibition : — Anetholate, Carbolate, and Eugenate of Quinine, Sulphate of Conchinine, Santonate of Sodium, Laudanine and Pseudomorphine, and a speci¬ men of German Opium. From Mr. T. Farries. Specimens of Apocynin, Chelonin, Eupurpurin, Hamamelin, Stillingin, Xanthoxylin and False Quebracho Bark. From Messrs. Burgoyne, Burbidges, Cyriax and Farries. Two crystalline acids, separated from commercial artificial Salicylic Acid. From Messrs. Hopkin and Williams. Specimen of genuine Chian Turpentine. From Dr. John Clay, Birmingham. Specimens illustrating the composition of Cod Liver Oil, as exhibited at the last Paris Exhibition, in¬ cluding oleic acid, solid fatty acids, volatile acids, biliary matter and gaduine. From Messrs. Southall, Brothers and Barclay. Specimen of Lisbon Copal, apparently not of fossil origin. From Mons. C. Chantre. Specimens of South American Drugs. From Messrs. Wyleys and Co., Coventry. Specimens of Chinese Opium Smoking Apparatus and three cases of Indian Drugs. From the Director of the Royal Gardens, Kew. Herbarium specimens of the plant yielding Chinese Oil of Peppermint. From Mr. C. Ford, Director of the Botanical Gardens at Hong Kong. Herbarium specimens of Aristolochia Clematitis (the uncultivated plant). From Mr. R. Modlen, Oxford. Herbarium specimens of Daphne Laureola. From Mr. T. Romans. The Curator had also reported that M. Pfleiderer had offered to present the Society with one of his mixing machines, and it was recommended that the offer be accepted. It was also recommended that a small quantity of zircon and phenakite be purchased for the Museum, specimens having been submitted. Also that the Curator pay a visit to Glasgow, in order to select and superintend the removal of some valuable specimens of crystals which had been offered the Society by Mr. E. C. C. Stanford. The Curator had made an application for an assistant, and the Committee recommended that one be engaged at v a salary of not more than 30 s. per week. Mr. Frazer and Mr. Mackay having expressed their approval of the Curator visiting Glasgow and Edinburgh, The President remarked, in reference to the engage¬ ment of an assistant in the Museum, that the Curator had a great deal of his time occupied in classifying and arranging specimens sent from Kew, and other sources ; in answering queries and giving information to visitors, and in identifying specimens of drugs sent to him from all parts. It was absolutely necessary that an assistant should be engaged to perform the more mechanical part of the work. The report and recommendations of the Committee were received and adopted. The Historical Sketch of Pharmacy. Specimen copies of this book were laid on the table, and it was referred to the Library, Museum and La¬ boratory Committee to decide on the style of binding which should be adopted. HOUSE. The report of this Committee was received and adopted, but it contained nothing calling for special notice. The main portion of it referred to cleaning and decorating the premises of the Society in Edinburgh. Mr. Mackay suggested that a fire-proof safe should be procured, for the purpose of keeping the register books belonging to the North British Branch. This proposition was acceded to, and included in the report. GENERAL PURPOSES. The report of this Committee included the usual letter from the Solicitor stating the progress of various matters 52 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [July 10, 1880. which had been placed in his hands. In the case of Mr. Jackson, of Chesterfield, the defendant had paid the penalty and costs into Court ; in the case of Mr. Hartley, Sheffield, judgment had been obtained against the defend¬ ant. The same result had been obtained in the case of Mr. Wright, Liverpool. Mr. Jenkins, Llangadock, had paid the penalty and costs into Court. A verdict had also been obtained against Mr. Copping, Manchester. The Solicitor had also reported that the appeal case stood the eighth on the list of cases for hearing. Several other cases of alleged infringement, particulars of which had been sent to the Registrar, had been con¬ sidered, and in some instances prosecutions had been ordered. The report was as usual considered in Com¬ mittee. On resuming, the report and recommendations of the Committee were received and adopted. The Bill foe Regulating the Manufacture and Sale of Spirit. Mr. Hampson asked if the Spirits Bill now going through the House of Commons was receiving attention. The President said it was. Mr. Williams said there were clauses which would be very injurious to chemists and druggists, inasmuch as there was a provision that no article should be made or kept in stock in which methylated spirit had been used, under a heavy penalty. Mr. Hampson thought that hitherto the law had been in one direction, and the regulations issued by the Board of Inland Revenue in another. Instead of all persons being amenable to the law, they were amenable to official regulations which were uncertain and unsatisfactory. It ought to be known exactly what the law was which people had to obey, and not have to obtain permission to do cer¬ tain things, the interpretation of which was extremely doubtful. Mr. Sandford said his attention having been called to this Bill by the Secretary, he saw certain things which appeared to him to require alteration, and he, therefore, waited on the solicitors to the Board of Inland Revenue, and put the case before them. They assured him that the Bill was simply to consolidate, not in any way to alter the existing law. The Bill allowed the use of methylated spirit in the preparation of sulphuric ether and chloro¬ form as before, and he suggested that it might also be extended so as to allow of its use in such operations as extracting the resin of scammony, an article to which his attention had been called by the President, where the methylated spirit all passed off before the substance was ready for use. He, therefore, asked the solicitors to insert words rendering it necessary for the spirit to remain as a component part to constitute an offence. They told him that it would be very difficult to intro¬ duce any regulation of that kind, but that it was quite unnecessary, because if resin of scammony or any dry article which had no methylated spirit in it were ex¬ amined it could not be proved any had been used. Two or three days after, however, his notice was drawn to the omission of one word which was very important; he again called and drew attention to it, and he believed the matter would receive full consideration. The old Act of 1866, said that “no person shall use methylated spirit or any derivative thereof in the preparation of any article capable of being used either wholly or partially as a beverage, or internally as a medicine ; and if any person shall use, or shall sell or have in his possession any such article in the manufacture and composition of which methylated spirit should have been used, he should be liable to a penalty. Now, in the new Act the word “such” had been omitted, accidentally he thought, and it therefore made a person liable for the possession of any article. He, therefore, asked that the word “such” should lie re inserted, and he hoped it would be, but he was told that the Bill had to await the result of the Budget. It was a curious fact that under the old Act, permission had been obtained from the Board of Inland Revenue to make soap and compound camphor liniment with methylated spirit, and afterwards on a special application by this Council that permission was extended to aconite and belladonna lini¬ ments, but it now appeared that there really had been no occasion to obtain permission for either of these things, they being already exempted by the word “such,” which limited restrictions to articles which might be used as a beverage or a medicine to be taken internally. He was also informed that whatever regulations had been made under the old Act would remain in force under the new. Mr. Williams remarked that the Council had been told the same thing in the case of other Acts, but when the Acts came to be applied there were found to be most material alterations required. Besides, the reading of police magistrates and judges was not always the same as that of the Privy Council, or those who drew the Act ; and he wanted everything to be made plain in the Act itself. Methylated spirit was largely used in the preparation of some of the vegetable alkaloids, and if the Act passed as it now stood, all this manufacture in Great Britain would be entirely stopped. Methylated spirit had been used in the preparation of strychnine, atropine, and such like bodies, and if it were stopped all the trade would go abroad, because it would be impossible to compete with foreign makers. Mr Sandford said if no one could be prosecuted for selling an article which had not the spirit remaining in it and if the word “such” were inserted, the difficulty would be removed. Mr Hampson thought notwithstanding the great obligations they were under to Mr. Sandford for having- taken action in the matter, it ought not, being so im¬ portant, to rest in the hands of any individual, and he would therefore move that a committee, consisting of the President, Vice-President, Treasurer, and Messrs. Sand¬ ford and Williams, be requested to watch and report on this Bill. Mr Andrews seconded the motion. Mr Richardson supported the motion. In addition to the articles mentioned by Mr Williams, methylated spirit was used considerably in the manufacture of compound extract of colocynth. But he understood from Mr. Sandford that the introduction of the word “such” would make an immense difference. He was lately asked by a surgeon to make him four winchesters of tincture of opium with methylated spirit for outward application ; he told him he was not permitted by law to do so, but as he understood Mr. Sandford it might be done if the product was not intended to be taken internally. Mr. Sandford said that was not so. It was only permissible in cases where the article could not be used internally. Mr. Symes having spoken in support of the motion, it was put and carried unanimously. Mr. Churchill said it would be desirable to obtain the same exemptions under the new Bill as were enjoyed under the old. The School of Pharmacy. The Council then went into committee to consider the report of the Special Committee appointed to consider the condition of the Society’s School. It was resolved that the result of the Committee’s deliberations be communicated to the Professors. Appointment of Professors and Curator. Professor Redwood was reappointed Professor of Chemistry and Pharmacy for the ensuing year. Professor Bentley was reappointed Professor of Botany and Materia Medica for the ensuing year. Professor Attfield was reappointed Professor of Practical Chemistry for the ensuing year. Mr. Holmes was reappointed Curator forthe ensuing year. The Council Examinations. Messrs. M. Carteighe and Corder were appointed to conduct the examinations •in July for the prizes offered by the Council. July 10, 1830.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 33 List of Local Secretaries, 1880-81.* The following gentlemen were appointed Local Secre¬ taries for the ensuing year : — Towns eligible. Names of persons appointed. Aberdare . . Aberdeen . Abergele . Aberystwith . . Abingdon . Accrington . Altrincham . . Andover . Arbroath . Ashbourne . Ashby-de-la-Zouch . . Ashton-under-Lyne . . Aylesbury . Ayr . Banbury . Banff . Bangor ../ . . Barnsley . Barnstaple . Barrow-in-Furness . . Bath . Beaumaris . Bedford . Belper . Berwick . . Bewdley . Birkenhead . Birmingham . Bishop Auckland . Blackburn . Bodmin . Bolton . Boston . Bournemouth . Bradford (Yorkshire) Brecon . Bridgnorth . Bridlington . . Bridport . Brighton . Bristol . . Buckingham . Burnley . . . . . Burslem . Bury . Bury St. Edmunds . Caine . Davidson, Charles. Hannah, John. Davies, John Hugh. Smith, William. Sprake, David Lewis. Hughes, Edward. Gould, Robert George. Shield, George. Bradley, Edwin Silvester. Johnson, Edwin Eli. Bostock, William. Turner, John. Ball, George Vincent. Ellis, Bartlett. Baker, Henry Villars. Badger, Alfred. Goss, Samuel. Steel, Thomas. Commans, Robert Dyer. Cuthbert, John M. Ashton, John. Carr, Walter Paterson. Nicholson, Henry. Southall, William. Dobinson, Thomas. F am worth, W illiam. Williams, J oel Drew. Dutton, George. Duncan, Alexander. Rimmington, Felix W. E. Meredith, John. Deighton, Thomas Milner Forge, Christopher. Tucker, Charles. Gwatkin, James Ross, Stroud, J ohn. Sirett, George Benyon. Thomas, Richard. Blackshaw, Thomas. Youngman, Edward. Cambridge . . Deck, Arthur. Canterbury . Bing, Edwin. Cardiff . Hollway, Alfred Brown. Cardigan . Jones, John Edward. Carlisle . Thompson, Andrew. Carmarthen . Davies, Richard M. Carnarvon . Lloyd, William. Chatham . . Crofts, Holmes Cheney. Chelmsford . Baker, Charles Patrick. Cheltenham . Smith, Nathaniel. Chester . Baxter, Geoige. Chesterfield . Windle, John T. Chichester . . Long, William Elliott. Chippenham . Coles, John Coles. Christchurch . Green, John. Cirencester . . . Mason, Joseph Wright. Clitheroe . Cockermouth . Bowerbank, J oseph. Colchester . Cordley, William Bains. Congleton . Goode, Charles. Coventry . Wyley, John. * Local Secretaries are appointed in all towns in Great Britain which return a Member or Members to Parliament, and in such other towns as contain not less than three Members of the Society or Associates in Business. Towns eligible. Crewe . . Cricklade . Croydon . Darlington . Deal . Denbigh . Derby . Devizes . Devonport . Dewsbury . Diss . Doncaster . Dorchester . Dorking . Dover . Droitwich . Dudley . Dumfries . Dundee . . Dunfermline . . Durham . Edinburgh . Elgin . Ely . Evesham . Exeter . Eye . Falkirk . Falmouth . Fareham . Faversham . Flint . Folkestone . Forfar . r. . Frome . Gainsborough . Gateshead . Glasgow . Gloucester . Gosport . Grantham . Gravesend . Greenock . Grimsby, Great . Guernsey . Guildford . Haddington . Halifax . Harrogate . Hartlepool . Harwich . Hastings and St. Leonards Haverfordwest . Hawick . Helensburgh . Helston . Hereford . Hertford . Hexham . Heywood . Horsham . Huddersfield . Hull . Huntingdon . Huntly . Hyde . Hythe . Inverness . Ipswich . Jersey . Kendal . . Kidderminster . Kilmarnock . . King’s Lynn . Kingston-on-Thames _ Names of persons appointed. ..McNeil, James Norton. ..Barritt, George. ..Robinson, James. ..Green, John. . . E d wards, W illiam . ..Stevenson, Richard. ..Codd, Francis. ..Matterson, Edward H. . .Gostling, Thomas Preston. ..Howorth, James. ..Evans, Alfred John. ..Clift, Joseph. ..Bottle, Alexander. ..Taylor, Edmund. ..Gare, Charles Hazard. ..Allan, William. ..Hai'die, James. ..Seath, Alexander. ..Sarsfield, William. ..Mackay, John. ..Robertson, William. . . Pate, Henry Thomas. ...Dingley, Richard Loxley. ...Delves, George. ..Bishop, Robert. , . . Murdoch, David. , . .Newman, Walter Francis. ...Batchelor, Charles. ...Underdown, Fredk. W. ...Jones, Michael. ...Goodliffe, George. , . . Ranken, J ames A. Spouncer, Henry Thomas. Elliott, Robei’t. Kinninmont, Alexander. Meadows, Henry. Hunter, John. Cox, J ohn. Bulgin, William. Botterill, George Thomas. Arnold, Adolphus. Martin, Edward W. Watt, James. Dyer, William. Davis, R. Hayton. Jackson, William G. Bevan, Charles F. Bell, James Alfred. .Williams, William. .Craig, John. .Harvie, George. .Troake, Marler H. .Williams, Walter. .Lines, George. .Gibson, John Pattison. .Beckett, William. .Williams, Philip. .King, William. .Bell, Charles Bains. .Provost, John Pullen. .Chalmers, George. .Wild, Joseph. Lemmon, Robert Alee. .Galloway, George Ross. .Anness, Samuel Richard. .Ereaut, John, jun. .Severs, Joseph. .Hewitt, George. .Borland, John. .Palmer, Wm. Jos. .Walmsley, Samuel. 34 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [July 10, 1S80. Towns eligible. Kirkcaldy . Knaresborough . Knutsford . Lancaster . . Launceston . Leamington . Leeds . Leek . Leicester . Leighton Buzzard .. .. Leith . Leominster . Lewes . . Lichfield . Lincoln . Liskeard . Liverpool . Llandudno . Longton . Loughborough . . Louth . .-. Lowestoft . Ludlow . Lyme Regis . Lymington . Macclesfield . Maidstone . Maldon . Malmesbury . Malton . M alvern . Manchester, etc . March . Margate . Marlborough . Marlow . Merthyr Tydvil . . Middlesborough . Midhurst . Monmouth . Montgomery . Montrose . Morpeth . Neath . Newark . .Newbury . Newcastle-under-Lyme Newcastle-on-Tyne .. .. Newport (I. of Wight) Newport (Mon.) . New Radnor . Newton Abbot . Newtown . Northallerton . Northampton . Norwich . Nottingham . Nuneaton . Oldham . Oswestry . Over Darwen . Oxford . Paisley . Pembroke . Penrith . Penzance . Perth . Peterborough . . Petersfield . Plymouth . . Pontefract . Poole . Portsmouth, etc . Preston . Ramsgate . Names of persons appointed. ..Storrar, David. ..Potter, Charles. ..Silvester, Henry Thomas. ..Bagnall, Wm. Henry. ..Eyre, Jonathan Symes. ..Davis, Henry. ..Reynolds, Richard. ..Johnson, William. ..Clark, Walter Beales. . Readman, William. ..Finlayson, Thomas. ..Davis, David Frederick. ..Martin, Thomas. ..Perkins, John Jaquest. ..Malt by, Joseph. ..Young, Richard. ..Symes, Charles. ..Penney, William Scaly. ..Prince, Arthur G. ..Paget, John. ..Hurst, John B. ..Sale, Thomas J. . . W oodhouse, George. ..Thornton, Edward. ..Allen, Adam U. ..Bates, William Isaac. Wall worth, David. Brown, Francis J ames. Buckle, James. Metcalfe, Edmund Henry. Wilkinson, William. Davies, Peter Hughes. .Candler, Joseph Thomas. Smyth, Walter. Buck, Thomas. Cowap, Samuel Evan. Key, Hobson. Burrell, George. Marshall, George T. Hibbert, Walter. March, William. Hickman, Frederick. Cartwright, William. Martin, Nicholas H. Orchard, Herbert Joseph. Seys, J ames Ancas. Poulton, John. Owen, Edward. Warrior, William. Bingley, John. .Sutton, Francis. Fitzhugh, Richard. .IlifFe, George. .Hargraves, H. Lister. .Saunders, George James. .Shorrock, Ralph. Prior, George Thomas. Hatrick, William. Treweeks, Rich. Harwood. .Kirkbride, William. ■ Cornish, Henry Robert. ■ Heanley, Marshall. .Edgeler, William B. Balkwill, Alfred P. .Bratley, William. Penney, William. .Childs, James L. Barnes, Lawrence R. .Morton, Henry. Towns eligible. Reading... . Redditch . Retford . Richmond (Yorks) ... .Ripon . Rochdale . Rochester . Rothesay . Rugby . Ryde (Isle of Wight) Rye . St. Albans . St. Andrews . St. Austell . St. Ives (Cornwall) ... Salisbury . Sandwich . Scarborough . Seacombe . Selby . Shaftesbury . Sheerness . Sheffield . Shields, South . Shipley . Shoreham . Shrewsbury . Slough . Southampton . . Southport . Spalding . Stafford . Staly bridge . Stamford . Stirling . . . Stockport . Stockton-on-Tees . Stoke-on-Trent . Stourbridge . Stratford-on-Avon . . . Stroud . Sudbury . Sunderland . Swansea . Tamworth . Taunton . Tavistock . Teignmouth . Tenby . . Tewkesbury . Thirsk . . Tiverton . Torquay . Totnes . Truro . Tunbridge Wells . Tynemouth . Uttoxeter . . Wakefield . Wallingford . Walsall . Wareham . Warrington . Warwick . Watford . Wednesbury . Wellington (Somerset) Wenlock . Westbury . West Bromwich . Weston-super-Mare ... Weymouth . Whitby . Whitehaven . Wick . Names of persons appointed. ..Hayward, Wm. Griffith. ..Mousley, William. . .Clater, Francis. ..Thompson, John Thomas. . .Judson, Thomas. ..Taylor, Edward. ..Harris, Henry William. ..Duncan, William. . . Chamberlain, Arthur G. ..Pollard, Henry Hindes. ..Waters, William Allen. . .Ekins, Ai’thur Edward. . .Govan, Alexander. ..Hern, William Henry. ..Young, Tonkin. ..Atkins, Samuel Ralph. . Baker, Frank. ..Whitfield, John. ..Walker, John Henry. ..Cutting, Thomas John. ..Powell, John. . .Bray, John. ..Ward, William. ..Mays, Robert J. J. ..Dunn, Henry. ..Fenner, Edwin. ..Cross, William Gowen. ..Griffith, Richard. . .Dawson, Oliver R. ..Ashton, William. . Shadford, Major. . .Averill, John. . .Brierley, Richard. Duncanson, William. Kay, Samuel. Brayshay, Thomas. Adams, Frank. Bland, Thomas Frederick. Hawkes, Richard. Blake, William F. Harding, James John. .Sharp, David Blakey. Griffiths, William. Alikins, Thomas Boulton. Prince, Henry. Gill, William. Cornelius, Joseph. Davies, Moses Prosser. Allis, Francis. Havill, Paul. Smith, Edward. Keen, Benjamin. Percy, Thomas Bickle. Howard, Richard. Johnson, John Borwell. Wice, Jonathan H. Payne, Sidney. .Bate, Joseph William. Randall, Thomas. Woods, Joseph Henry. Pratt, Henry. Chater, Edward Mitclidl. Gittoes, Samuel James. .Langford, John Brown. Taylor, Stephen. Gibbons, George. Groves, Thomas Bennett. Stevenson, John. Kitchin, Archibald. Miller, Kenneth. July 10, 1880.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 35 Towns eligible. Names of persons appointed. Wigan . Phillips, Jonathan. Wigton . Wilton . Winchester . Hunt, Ricliaid. Windsor . Russell, Charles J. L. Wolverhampton . Brevitt, William Yates, Woodbridge . Betts, John. Woodstock . Griffits, John Alonza Worcester . . Virgo, Charles. Worthing . Cortis, Arthur Brownhill. Wycombe . Furmston, Samuel C. Yarmouth, Great . Poll, Wm. Sheppard. Yeovil . Maggs, Thomas Charles. York . Davison, Ralph. Local Examinations. The Secretary presented the following table, showing the attendance of candidates at the various centres for the last eight Preliminary examinations. PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION. List of Centres and Table of Attendances of Candidates at each Centre. 1S7S. Oct. 1S79. Jan., Apr., July, Oct. ! 1SS0. Jail. 1880. Apr. i : 1S80. July. Total number of atten¬ dances at each centre at 8 exami¬ nations. ENGLAND AND WALES. I • Birmingham . 12 87 20 20 17 156 Brighton . 3 14 3 — 5 25 Bristol . 6 44 13 6 15 84 Cambridge . 5 22 2 10 1 40 Canterbury . — 10 2 4 11 27 Cardiff . 3 OK AH/ 8 5 3 44 Carlisle . 6 30 4 9 8 57 Carmarthen . 7 42 3 9 4 65 Carnarvon . 2 23 5 7 10 47 Cheltenham . 2 8 3 2 1 16 Darlington . 3 25 4 7 7 46 Exeter . 2 34 13 9 4 62 Hull . _ 40 6 13 3 62 Lancaster . 1 21 5 9 13 49 Leeds . 1 7 70 11 17 15 120 Lincoln . 3 40 13 9 7 ' 72 Livei’pool . 7 / 60 10 14 18 109 London . 1 O Q oo 211 45 45 46 380 Manchester . 18 104 23 26 23 194 Newcastle . 5 32 9 13 10 69 Northampton . — 28 4 5 7 44 Norwich . 2 46 8 13 11 SO Nottingham . 8 53 13 15 12 101 Oxford . 1 7 1 2 3 14 Peterborough . 2 28 4 3 3 40 Sheffield . 8 32 3 5 13 61 Shrewsbury . 2 21 4 5 4 36 Southampton . 5 44 8 6 5 68 Truro . 1 19 2 3 1 26 Worcester . | 2 12 2 2 1 19 York . 2 39 5 11 63 SCOTLAND. Aberdeen . 13 61 9 17 8 108 Dundee . 7 21 5 7 7 47 Edinburgh . 11 63 20 13 27 ' 134 Glasgow . 3 46 8 9 11 77 Inverness . 2 9 2 5 1 19 Douglas, I. of Man _____ 2 _ ____ _ 2 Guernsey . f 1 1 2 — — 4 Jersey . — 1 1 1 1 i 3 It was resolved that Superintendents be appointed at the same centres as last year, and that the appointments be offered in the first instance to the Local Secretaries in the respective places with the exception of London. Report of Examinations. June, 1880. ENGLAND AND WALES. Candidates. Examined. Passed. Failed. Major, (16th) . . . . 9 4 5 Minor, (16th) . . IS 12 6 „ (17th) . . . . 25 15 10 —43 —27 —16 Modified, (16th) . . . 1 0 1 53 31 22 Preliminary Examination. 9 certificates were received in lieu of the Society’s examination : — 2 University of Oxford. 2 University of Edinburgh. 1 University of Glasgow. 4 College of Preceptors. Opinion of the Board of Examiners on the Desirability of the Establishment of a Curriculum. The report also included a statement that the London Board had discussed the desirability of requiring from candidates for the Minor and Major examinations a certificate of having completed a curriculum at some recognized school of pharmacy, and the opinion of the Board appeared to be unanimous that the production of such a certificate was very desirable if practicable. Mr. Brady had also reported to the London Board that the subject had been discussed by the deputation who went to Edinburgh with the members of the North British Board, and that those gentlemen held the same view and had passed a minute to that effect. The opinion was unanimously expressed by the Scotch Board that if a curriculum were recognized at all, it must be compulsory, not permissive. But it was also felt that as the subject was not free from difficulties, considering the existing rules and regulations of the Society, a more decided opinion could not be expressed until a definite scheme was brought forward. The consideration of the report of the deputation to Scotland and correspondence on other matters was deferred until the next meeting. ^rocccbingp of Scientific Societies, SOCIETY OF ARTS. The Chemistry of Bread-Making.* EY PROFESSOR GRAHAM, D.SC. Lecture LIL. ( Continued from paeje 16.) I have also here a series of results obtained by Mr. Brown, Demonstrator in the Laboi*atory of Chemical Technology of University College, for the purposes of these lectures, on the influence of moisture in the process which bakers submit the flour to when they add water at a certain temperature — 100° Falir., in degrading some flours compared with other flours. * Cantor Lectures : Delivered November and December 1879. Reprinted from the Journal of the Society of Arts. 36 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [July 10, 1880. Infusion Products of Elour. (Henry Brown.) Cold. 2 Hours. 4 Hours. 8 Hours. Cold. 2 Hours. 4 Hours. 8 Hours. Vienncl Whites. Maltose .... trace. 2-41 3-65 4-09 A '36 2'83 4'09 5'39 Dextrin .... trace. 2-17 2*79 4-35 0'89 2'34 2'40 3-80 Soluble albuminoids. 076 0-58 0-76 1-28 «jrH So i 0-76 0'65 1'29 212 0*76 5T6 7-20 9-73 1 *’33 3-01 5'82 7-78 11-81 3 Best Whites. o 2 Maltose .... none. 1-57 2-04 3-41 A -57 6'01 6-01 7*59 Dextrin .... 1-21 1-48 2-74 2-85 go* 1-04 0-84 1*21 0-67 Soluble albuminoids. 0-71 0-58 0-31 1-54 O .. o o i 1-05 1-45 1-31 1-89 1-92 3-63 5-59 7-80 > 3-66 8'30 8'53 1015 Best Households. Maltose .... 1-00 1-36 4-09 3-93 trace 3'41 3'93 4-99 Dextrin . . . . 1T3 2-46 2-09 3-79 pi • 2'70 0'95 2'09 2'89 Soluble albuminoids. 0-93 0-79 1-23 1-42 > O Clear liquid. Alcoholic liquor . . . ^ Turbid liquid. JJ JJ •••!»> Clear liquid. Hydrochloric liquor . 1 „ Rather abundant pre¬ cipitate. 9 >j jj • • ^ jj Turbid liquid. Following my own process in the preparation of calves’ and sheep’s pepsine, I obtained the following results : — Calves’ pepsine, Filtered liquor 11 5) Unfiltered liquor 11 11 Sheep’s „ Filtered liquor 11 11 Unfiltered liquor 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 0J0 gr. Clear liquid. 0*05 ,, Precipitate. 0’20 „ Clearliquid. 0J0 „ Precipitate. 0 05 „ Clearliquid. 0'025 „ Turbidliquid. 0J0 „ Clearliquid. 0'05 ,, Precipitate. These products upon testing gave the following re¬ sults : — The Codex process, tested with the same quantity of sheep’s stomach, gave — 50 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [July 17, 1SS0, Yield. — Petit’s process .... 10’30 gram. Codex process .... 2’50 „ Activity. — Petit’s process, filtered liquor 0-05 gr. Clear liquid. Codex process . 0'50 „ Precipi¬ tate. To sum up, it will be seen that it is easy to prepare pepsines of great activity. With fresh pigs’ stomachs that have not undergone any alteration, taking the most minute precautions during the evaporation, I have succeeded in preparing pepsines con¬ verting into albuminose one thousand times their weight of strongly dried fibrin. With sheep’s stomachs the activity of the pepsine pre¬ pared is about one-tenth. After the experiments that I have already published* relative to the simple solution of fibrin, it will, I hope, be clearly established that there exists an absolute difference between the solution of fibrin and its con¬ version into albuminose, and that pepsines which only dissolve ten times their weight of fibrin will no longer be considered good. With the most active pepsine prepared by my process, I have been able to obtain in seven hours the solution of five hundred thousand times its weight of fibrin. The contents of several comparison flasks, placed in the same conditions, were not liquefied, and had preserved their gelatinous appearance. In making comparative ex¬ periments it is necessary to take the greatest care not to introduce into the flask the least trace of pepsine, how¬ ever small. It may further be useful to add that by prolonged exposure in the stove acidulated water alone would de¬ termine the more or less complete solution of the fibrin. NOTE ON A SIMPLE MEANS FOR INCREASING CERTAINTY OF PERCEPTION OF COLOUR CHANGE IN VARIOUS TITRATIONS.+ BY A. DUPB13, PH.D., F.R.S. As is well known, the change from pale yellow to red, in the titration of chlorides by means of nitrate silver with neutral chromate as indicator, is more distinctly perceived by gaslight than by daylight. No doubt eyes differ in regard to their powrer of perceiving slight varia¬ tion of colour tint, and in my case I have always found it advisable, in the analysis of potable waters, containing from one to two grains of chlorine per gallon, considerably to concentrate by evaporation previous to titration, or else to perform the titration by gaslight. The adoption of the following simple plan enables us, however, to per¬ ceive the change of colour as sharply and with as great a certainty by daylight as by gaslight. The water is placed into a white porcelain dish (100 c.c. are a useful quantity), a. moderate amount of neutral chromate is added (sufficient to impart a marked yellow colour to the water), but instead of looking at the water directly a flat glass cell containing some of the neutral chromate solution is interposed between the eye and the dish. The effect of this is to neutralize the yellow tint of the water, or, in other wrords, if the concentration of the solution in the cell is even moderately fairly adjusted to the depth of tint imparted to the water, the appearance of the latter, looked at through the cell, is the same as if the dish were filled with pure water. If now the standard silver solution is run in, still looking through the cell, the first faint appearance of a red coloration becomes strikingly manifest, and what is more, when once the correct point has been reached the eye is never left in doubt however long wre may be looking at the water. A check experiment in w'hich the water with just a slight deficiency of silver, or excess of chloride, is used for com¬ parison is therefore unnecessary. The plan is useful chiefly with very dilute solutions, one or two grains of * See Pharmaceutical Journal , [3], vol. x., p. 584. f Read before the Society of Public Analysts, on June 2, 1880. Frun the Analyst, July, 1880. chlorine per gallon, and since I have adopted it I have entirely given up the concentration of the water prior to- titration formerly practised. A similar plan will, I think, be found useful in other titrations. Thus, in the case of turmeric, the change from yellow to brown is perceived more sharply and with greater certainty when looking through a flat cell contain¬ ing tincture of turmeric of suitable concentration than with the naked eye. The liquid to be titrated should, as in the former case, be placed into a white porcelain dish. AgaiD, in estimating the amount of carbonate of lime in a water by means of decinormal sulphuric acid and cochineal, the exact point of neutrality can be more sharply fixed by looking through the cell filled with a cochineal solution. In this case, the following is the plan I have found to answer best. The water to be tested — about 250 c.c. — is placed into a flat porcelain evaporating dish, part of which is covered over with a white porce¬ lain plate. The water is now tinted with cochineal as usual, and the sulphuric acid run in, the operator looking at the dish through the cell containing the neutral cochineal solution. At first, the tint of the water and the tint in which the porcelain plate is seen are widely different ; as, however, the carbonate becomes gradually neutralized, the two tints approach each other more and more, and when neutrality is reached they appear identical ; assuming that the strength of the cochineal solution in the cell and the amount of this solution added to the water have been fairly well matched. Working in this manner I have found no difficulty (taking | litre of water) to come within 0T c.c. of decinormal acid in two successive experiments, and the difference need never exceed 0'2 c.c. In the cell I employ, the two- glass plates are a little less than half-an-inch apart. A somewhat similar plan may be found useful in other titrations, or in fact in many operations depending on the perceptions of colour change. MANUFACTURE OF GLAUBER’S SALT IN THE SOUTH OF FRANCE * The following interesting description of the extraction of Glauber’s salt from the sea-brines, as now practised at the large salines at the mouth of the Rhone River, con¬ tains several items of interest to the chemist : — The sodium sulphate is obtained by decomposing a liquor which contains common salt and magnesium sulphate in proper proportions by the aid of artificial cold. The Carre ice machine is used for this purpose. The crude material, the sel mixte, crystallizes out at a certain stage in the evaporation of the mother liquor left after common salt has crystallized. This special liquor is then cooled by an ingenious application of the refrigera¬ ting process until —6° is reached, when Glauber’s salt separates out as a crystalline scum, which is removed and carried by elevators to large draining casks. Here the salt is freed from adhering water and is now ready to be made anhydrous. This operation had given great diffi¬ culty, as the evaporation in iron pans was not possible, on account of the tendency of the separating anhydrous sulphate to burn, and calcination with the aid of a reverberatory flame was also extremely difficult to carry out. The difficulty has been overcome very simply. The water of crystallization is not driven off by heat, but is displaced. For this purpose, the crystallized Glauber’s salt, in quantities of 1500 kilograms, is fused with a small amount of the mother liquor in a wooden tank heated by a copper worm and provided with stirrers, when 250 kilos of common salt are added. In the degree that the salt dissolves, anhydrous Glauber’s salt is precipitated, and at the end of the operation about 85 per cent, of the Glauber’s salt originally used is obtained as an anhydrous precipitate. The salt so obtained has at most 0‘5 per cent, sodium chloride and 5 per cent, of water present. * From Chem. IndustHe, January, 1880, p. 9. Re¬ printed from the American Journal of Pharmacy, May. July 17, 1880]. THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 51 (Tbc |1barm;ucutit;U |ounial SATURDAY, JULY 17, 18S0. Communications for the Editorial department of this Journal , hooks for review , etc., should he addressed to the Editor, 17, Bloomsbury Square. Instructions from Members and Associates respecting the transmission of the Journal should he sent to Mr. Elias Bremridge, Secretary , 17, Bloomsbury Square, W.C. Advertisements, and payments for Copies of the Journal, Messrs. Churchill, New Burlington Street, London, W. Envelopes indorsed “ Pharm. J burn.” WHAT IS ACONITINE ? Indirectly rather than otherwise this question has been forced upon the attention of medical men and pharmacists by most of the work that has been carried out during the last few years in connection with the active principle of aconite. For a long time the amorphous pulverulent substances known as aconitine were distinguished, according to the place where they were made, as German, French, or English aconitine, and they were generally credited with widely different characters, and it was not until Mr. Groves directed his attention to the mode of extracting from aconite root the alkaloid con¬ stituent present in it that some indications of the existence of at least two distinct alkaloids were obtained. It was not even then shown distinctly that this was the case, but it seems to have been inferred rather than proved that true aconitine was a crystalline substance, and that the unequal activity of the various kinds of commercial aconitine was a consequence of the admixture with that substance of other alkaloids associated with it in aconite root and differing from it in physiological action. Subsequently, when Duquesnel published his process for preparing crystalline aconitine, there appeared to be some reason for anticipating that the various products known as English, German and French aconitine would be superseded by the intro¬ duction of a substance possessing definite chemical individuality. That result, however, has not yet been achieved, and though crystalline aconitine can be obtained, its cost is so great as almost to preclude its use. In America, among other incidents of the Pharma¬ copoeia revision now in progress, the question “ What is aconitine?” has come under consideration, and, as stated in a late number of this Journal, Dr. Rice has applied to Dr. Wright for a statement of the characteristics of pure crystalline aconitine, such as would serve for adoption in the new Pharmacopoeia. Considering what is known to be the case as regards the variable activity of com¬ mercial aconitine it is not surprising that medical men should be, as Dr. Rice says, disgusted with it, and that they should desire to be supplied with a more definite preparation. The characteristics of aconitine as laid down by Dr. Wright may be regarded as expressing the result of his extended investigation of this alkaloid and as furnishing satisfactory means of recognizing it and ascertaining its purity ; but while admitting in this respect the value of the information furnished by Dr. Wright, we are irresistibly reminded of the sage direction of an ancient teacher of the culinary art when describing the preparation of a hare, “ First catch your hare,” and in like manner it occurs to us as needful that we should first catch our aconitine. Dr. Wright considers that if prescribes would insist that the pure alkaloid only shall be used all difficulty would be got over, dispensers would necessarily procure the pure article as defined by Dr. Wright, and its cost, however much that might be, would only be a matter affecting the patients’ pockets and of no comparative moment when con¬ sidering the advantage they would gain from their medical advisers being able to use the alkaloid with confidence. But there are obstacles in the way which deserve consideration, since they may render such a solution of the question more difficult and less desirable than is supposed. Thus for instance there are many persons influenced by commercial considerations who would object to paying the high price of the pure crystalline article so long as another article is in the market at a lower price. Then, again, there are the difficulties of obtaining aconitine in the crystalline state ; from some roots it cannot be obtained at all, while in others the quantity obtainable varies very much. According to Dr. Wright’s own interjiretation of these differences of results in practical operations it is clear that what is chiefly needed for the introduc¬ tion of crystalline aconitine is a process by which it may be separated from those non-crystallizable sub¬ stances which prevent it from crystallizing. This applies both to the actual manufacture of the alka¬ loid, and to the valuation of the roots by which, as Dr. Wright suggests, their suitability for that pur¬ pose should be determined ; for if the valuation test crives a result which cannot be realized in manufac- turing operations, or if in both cases there be equal difficulty in separating cvystallizable aconitine from associated impurities which prevent it from crystal¬ lizing, we shall still have to follow the initial direc¬ tion of the old cook as best we may before we can go any further towards making crystalline aconitine take the place of that which is now generally used. Then comes the further question whether in the case of aconitine the crystalline condition is in itself such a trustworthy indication of purity and indivi¬ duality as to make it desirable to insist that all the aconitine used in medicine should be actually in the crystalline state? Dr. Wright’s definition of aconitine, given in this Journal two weeks ago, and his letter on the subject, furnish evidence that the crystallization of aconitine is so much influenced THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [July 17, 1SS0. by the presence of other substances that it may be looked upon almost as a matter of accident. Moreover, it is probable that in converting true aconitine into the crystalline state this can only be effected partially and with a large waste. What is wanted much more than the crvstalline condition of the aconitine to be used in medicine is a know¬ ledge of means by which the particular substance, possessing such powerful physiological activity, can be identilied and distinguished from other analogous inert or less active substances associated with it, and by which it can also be practically separated from them in manufacturing operations. In this sense we have still not only to catch our hare, but also to learn how to do this. In reference to the testing of the materials from which aconitine is to be prepared, it is certainly very desirable to have some means of determining in such materials the amount of the particular alkaloid re¬ quired; but we cannot endorse Dr. Weight’s sugges¬ tion that this should be done after the manner of an anthracene test, by a method prescribing specific details of operation, for, in a general way, there is no more vicious method of testing the value of an article, and, in the case referred to as an example, the results are always liable to defect arising from accidental presence of some substance not separated by the operations prescribed. It seems more reasonable to assume our knowledge of the che¬ mistry of aconite and of the alkaloids contained in it to be still too imperfect to admit of chemical tests being prescribed for ascertaining their indi¬ viduality or the purity of any one in particular by the aid of its chemical characteristics. As to the physiological action of the aconite alkaloids, we are also in want of satisfactory know¬ ledge, and we must look to the future results of such investigations as are in progress for the assist¬ ance which may be derived from this source. It must not, however, be supposed that by the foregoing remarks we desire in any degree to dis¬ parage the information given by Dr. Weight as the result of his labours; our intention is only to point out that it falls far short of what is required for a satisfactory settlement of the question “ What is aconitine ? ” and that it goes but a very little wTay towards showing how the existence of the physio¬ logically active alkaloid in aconite root can be .ascertained and how the extraction of it economically is to be carried out. Before these questions can be decided a very large amount of work will have to be done, and we hope that Dr. Weight will be able to continue his investigations to those ends. SUNDAY TRADING. A eetuen that has been prepared by the Chief Constable of Glasgow, showing the number of shops and other places of business found open within that city on Sunday the 6th of last month, offers but a sorry comment upon some correspondence that ap¬ peared not long ago in this Journal. According to this return on the Sunday mentioned, out of 2243 shops that were kept open in Glasgow 203, or rather over 9 per cent. , were drug shops. This is not only an absolute but a relative increase as compared with the year 1876, when the numbers were 166 out ot 2109, or not quite 8 per cent. In the same period the shops kept open in Glasgow on Sunday for the sale of such necessaries as milk, meat and bread show a decrease. JAVA CINCHONA BARK. Me. Consul Cameeon reports from Java that the Government cinchona crop of 1878, shipped to Holland during 1879, amounted to 91,649 kilos, and netted 179,700 florins, while the total expenses of cultivation amounted only to 52,862 florins. A commission appointed to investigate the rival merits of “mossing” and “coppicing” has presented an indecisive Report. Meanwhile a new method of collecting the bark, recommended by the Superin¬ tendent of the Government, is attracting attention. It differs from “ mossing ” in that it consists in scraping off the outer portions of the bark of the trunk only, allowing the inner bark, which by the “mossing” system is removed, to remain on the tree. PHARMACY IN NEW ZEALAND. With reference to the movement for the regula¬ tion of pharmacy in New Zealand, which was men¬ tioned as being promoted some months since, we learn that a letter has been received from the colonial premier by the President of the New Zealand Phar- ceutical Society stating that the proposed Pharmacy Bill was being printed and would be submitted to the Crown law officers. This was thought to indicate that the ministry considered the Bill of so much im¬ portance that it had been adopted as a Government measure and would be laid before the Legislature in the following session. . Meanwhile efforts are being made to develop the newly formed Pharmaceutical Society by the securing of rooms, the formation of a library and other measures. DEATH OF DR. PHOEBUS. Intelligence has been received of the death of Professor Dr. Philipp Phoebus, of Giessen, on the 1st inst., in his 76th year. For many years Pro¬ fessor Phoebus advocated the compilation of a European Pharmacopoeia, and for the furtherance of this object he eventually joined with some other leading continental pharmacists in the formation of a Phannaconomic Society. Some progress was made in the drawiug up of a scheme, and proofs showing the arrangement of the type, were prepared. The work of the society was brought before the Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain by Dr. Thudichum at an evening meeting in 1872 ; but since that time very little has been heard concerning it in this country. July 17, 1SS0 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 53 robin rial (Trims actions. evidence, seeing that defendants under the Adulteration Act were allowed to do so. CHEMISTS AND DRUGGISTS’ TRADE ASSO¬ CIATION OF GREAT BRITAIN. Meeting of Executive Committee. A meeting of the Executive Committee of this Asso¬ ciation was held at the office of the Association, 23, Burlington Chambers, New Street, Birmingham, Friday, July 9, 1880, at 1 p.m. Mr. Thomas Barclay (Birming¬ ham), President, in the chair ; Mr. Robert Hampson (London), Vice-President. Present — Messrs. Andrews (London), Arblaster (Bir¬ mingham), Bell (Hull), Churchill (Birmingham), Cross (Shrewsbury), Davison (Glasgow), Harrison (Sunder¬ land), Holdsworth (Birmingham), Owen (London), Stead (Leeds), Symes (Liverpool), Walker (Coventry), Williams (Manchester), and the Solicitor of the Association. The minutes of the previous meeting of the Executive and Sub-Committee meetings held on May 28 and July 5 were read and approved. The Secretary said that the Association had defended two of its members since the last meeting of the Executive, in summonses issued against them under the Weights and Measures Act. In the first of these, Mr. W. Wil¬ kinson, of 114, Lambeth Walk, Surrey, on May 19, was fined the nominal penalty of Is. per weight for having in his possession several apothecaries’ weights which were inaccurate. A report of the case had appeared in the trade journals. On the previous Wednesday their Soli¬ citor had defended Mr. E. Freeman, of Ledbury, in a summons charging him with having in his possession for use of trade one fourteen pound weight, which was false or unjust. This summons was dismissed on its being proved to the satisfaction of the bench that the weight was not used for the purpose of buying or selling goods.* Letters from Mr. Wilkinson and Mr. Freeman were read, expressing the thanks of those gentlemen for the assistance rendered by the officers of the Association. The latter sent also a donation of £2 to the Funds. The President said, after the prosecution in London, he felt there was no time to be lost in endeavouring to put a stop to such proceedings. He called upon Mr. Harrison, the Birmingham inspector appointed under the Act, who readily consented to an arrangement, by which he promised to send out a printed form to all chemists residing in his district, stating when he was ready to stamp their weights. He (Mr. Harrison) further promised to give them at least a month’s notice before they would be interfered with. That being the case, he thought it advisable to bring the matter before the President of the Board of Trade, with a view of inducing him to get other inspectors to do the same. He addressed a letter on the subject to Mr. Chamberlain, who in his reply, said — “Having regard to the opera¬ tion of the Act, as referred to in your communication, as well as in previous communications with the Pharmaceu¬ tical Society, a circular to the several local authorities will be prepared and issued from this department, referring to this correspondence, and telling them what has been done with regard to apothecaries’ weights and measures. By this means the President hopes to remedy to some extent the grievance of which you complain.” In continuation, the President said he was in favour of an effort being made to get the Act amended; he thought it most desirable that inspectors should not be paid by results, and the rural police who acted as inspectors of weights in country places were thoroughly incapable of testing small grain weights. Mr. Glaisyer thought it should be insisted on in any alteration of the Act “that defendants should be allowed to give evidence in their own defence.” Mr. Hampson could not see why defendants under the Weights and Measures Act should not be allowed to give * See p 59. It was moved by Mr. Hampson, seconded by Mr. Symes, and unanimously resolved : — “ That a Sub- Com¬ mittee, consisting of the officers of the Association, together with Messrs. Arblaster and Churchill, be ap¬ pointed to consider the working of the Weights and Mea¬ sures Act, and to deal with the same as they think fit.” It was moved by Mr. Hampson, seconded by Mr. Davison, and unanimously resolved: — “That the officers of the Association, together with Messrs. Andrews, Bell, Churchill, Cross, Jervis, Johnson, Maltbjr, Williams, Stead and Symes, form a Law and Parliamentary Com¬ mittee for the ensuing year, with power to deal with such cases as it deems expedient.” It was moved by Mr. Andrews, seconded by Mr. Bell, and unanimously resolved That the officers of the Association, together with Messrs. Arblaster and Church¬ ill, form a Finance Committee for the ensuing year.” It was moved by Mr. Williams, seconded by Mr. Arblaster, and unanimously resolved : — “ That the officers of the Association, together with Messrs. Andrews, Arblaster, Bell, Churchill, Cross, Harrison, Jervis, Johnson, Maltby, Owen, Phillips, Stead, Symes and Walker, form a General Purposes Committee for the ensuing year.” It was moved by Mr. Andrews, seconded by Mr. Owen, and unanimously resolved : — “That Mr. Henry Glaisyer be reappointed Solicitor to the Association for the ensuing year.” It was moved by Mr. Bell, seconded by Mr. Harrison, and unanimously resolved : — “That Mr. W. F. Hay don be reappointed Secretary to the Association on the same terms as before.” It was moved by Mr. Arblaster, seconded by Mr. Stead, and unanimously resolved : — “ That Mr. G. R. Templeman be reappointed Assistant-Secretary to the Association on the same terms as before.” It was moved by Mr. Hampson, seconded by Mr. Symes, and unanimously resolved: — “That Professor Attfield be reappointed Analytical Referee to the Asso¬ ciation for the ensuing year.” It was moved by the President, seconded by Mr. Owen, and unanimously resolved : — “ That Messrs. Laundy and Company, Public Accountants, be reappointed Auditors to the Association for the ensuing year.” It was moved by Mr. Cross, seconded by Mr. Arblaster, and unanimously resolved: — “That Messrs. Lloyd’s Banking Company be reappointed Bankers to the Asso - ciation for the ensuing year.” The Solicitor directed the attention of the Committee to several clauses in the Bill to Consolidate and Amend the Law relating to the Manufacture and Sole of Spirits, before the House of Commons, which he considered re¬ quired their attention. It was moved by Mr. Cross, seconded by Mr. Owen, and unanimously resolved : — “That the Bill to Consoli¬ date and Amend the Law relating to the Manufacture and Sale of Spirits be referred to the Law and Parlia¬ mentary Committee, with power to deal with it as they deem desirable.” A letter was read from Mr. C. W. Warriner, of Not¬ tingham, stating that the Nottingham and Notts Che¬ mists’ Association had appointed a committee “to consider and inquire into the present high rates charged by rail¬ way companies for the carriage of drugs in hampers, and to put themselves into communication with anyone whom they might think proper with a view to their reduction, and to report thereon.” The President said the letter just read was the out¬ come of a debate on the subject by the Nottingham Chemists’ Association, and therefore merited their best attention. Mr. Symes said the question of the carriage of drugs was a serious matter for both the wholesale houses and the country chemists. He had often found railway 54 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [July IT, 1SS0. companies very exacting ; tlieir rates were very high and their charges generally required very careful watching, as they frequently endeavoured to obtain more than their legitimate charges. Mr. Harrison said he thought the best plan would be to refer the Nottingham chemists to their Chamber of Commerce, as, in his opinion, that body would have more influence with the railway companies than an association representing one trade only. Mr. Churchill said he thought the matter was one that the Association might deal with as affecting chemists and not the Chamber of Commerce. Drugs paid a high rate of carriage. The drug rate from London to Birmingham was forty shillings per ton, whereas the mineral water and earthenware rates was twenty- eight shillings per ton. Mr. Hampson said the wholesale houses would be deeply interested in the matter, as it must be to their advantage to send their goods at a cheap rate. Mr. Walker said, as a representative of the wholesale trade, he might remark that their firm had repeatedly addressed railway companies on the subject, but to very little purpose. It was moved by Mr. Bell, seconded by Mr. Williams, and unanimously resolved : — “ That the question of the rates charged by railway companies for the carriage of drugs be referred to the Sub- Committee previously ap¬ pointed to deal with the working of the Weights and Measures Act.” It was moved by Mr. Harrison, seconded by Mr. Owen, and unanimously resolved : — “ That the Law and Parliamentary Committee be directed to address the Go¬ vernment with a view of obtaining such an amendment of the Jury Act as may provide that the exemption from ser¬ vice on juries enjoyed by pharmaceutical chemists should be extended to all registered chemists and druggists. ” The particulars of several cases of illegal trading in poisons were laid on the table, and the Solicitor and Secretary were instructed to take proceedings under the 17th section of the Pharmacy Act in such cases as they deemed expedient. iroteebmgs of Scientific Societies. SCHOOL OF PHARMACY STUDENTS’ ASSOCIATION. The last ordinary meeting of this Association for the present session was held on Thursday, July 8, Mr. R. H. Parker, Vice-President, in the chair. The Secretary gave his Report on Organic Chemistry, the subject being : — The Relation between the Chemical Constitution of Certain Organic Compounds and their Action upon the Ultra-Violet Rays. BY WYNDHAM R. DUNSTAN, F.C.S., Assistant Demonstrator of Chemistry in the Laboratories of the Pharmaceutical Society. The three principal methods of examining the action of various substances upon the ultra-violet rays of the spectrum are — (1) . The photographic method proposed by W. A. Miller,* in which the spectrum was obtained from electric sparks passing between silver electrodes, the liquid to be examined being placed in a cell with quartz faces. Glass cannot be used on account of its absorptive action upon the ultra-violet. The cell is placed immediately before the slit, the rays passing through a quartz prism and finally concentrated by means of a rock crystal lens upon an iodized collodion plate placed within a camera. (2) . The method of Stokes, f in which the spectrum is received upon a fluorescent screen, the ultra-violet portion thus being rendered visible. * ‘Phil. Trans.,’ 1863, i. + ‘Phil. Trans.,’ 1862, 606. (3). The methoc^more recently proposed by Soret,* in which a spectroscope having a fluorescent eye-piece is employed. Hartley and Huntington^ have examined the action of various organic compounds upon the ultra-violet portion of the spectrum, with a view of discovering if any con¬ nection existed between the chemical constitution of the bodies and their power of actinic absorption. To this end they have examined homologous series of alcohols, acids and hydrocarbons. The apparatus used -was a modification of Miller’s, using generally nickel instead of silver as electrodes and gelatine plates instead of iodized collodion, with other modifications. The position of the absorption bands and their measurement wrere determined by reference to the lines of cadmium, zinc and aluminium in the ultra-violet portion of the spectrum. Quartz cells filled with water were found to exert no action upon the ultra-violet rays, i.e., were diactinic. The alcohols of the CnH-2n-f 3 series were then examined, and "were found to be characterized by their diactinic properties. Methylic alcohol, CH3OH, when pure, was found to be nearly as transparent as water. Ethylic alcohol, C2H5OH, is less diactinic than methylic alcohol, and propylic alcohol, C3H7OH, is still less diac¬ tinic. A higher homologue of this series, octylic alcohol, C8H7OH, possessed considerably more absorptive power. It will be seen from the diagram exhibiting the results that every increment of CH.2 in the homologous series is accompanied by increased absorption of the more re¬ frangible ultra-violet rays, but no absorption bands are produced. The fatty acids were next examined, but owing to the difficulty of obtaining pure formic acid the sodium salts were examined, molecular weights of the salts being dissolved in equal volumes of water. The results which are shown in the diagram indicate increased absorption as the series is ascended, and it will be also observed that the fatty acids are less diactinic than their corresponding alcohols. This is probably due to the absorptive power of the carboxyl group (COOH) contained in the former. This theory is strengthened by the fact that oxalic acid (COOH)q produces a much greater absorptive action than acetic acid ] COOH From an examination of the ethereal salts of the fatty acids it was found that they resemble their corresponding alcohols and acids in their diactinic poAver, and do not produce absorption bands. The diagram shows the result of the examination of benzene and the substances containing the benzene nucleus. It will be seen that they all possess a great absorptive action and are further characterized by the production of well marked absorption bands at certain degrees of dilution. Benzene itself possesses great absorptive power, and is characterized by six absorption bands which appear when 1 part of benzene is dissolved in 7 50 parts of alcohol, and are well seen after a dilution to 1500. The layer of benzene solution used was ’75 inch thick, consequently a layer of benzene ^ ^-g-th of an inch will exhibit the ab¬ sorption bands. Phenol and thymol exhibit absorption bands which are more persistent after dilution than those of benzene. Benzoic acid, C6H5COOH, exhibits bands which are not destroyed when the dilution has reached more than 1 part per million. Phthalic acid, C6H4(COOH)2, is less diactinic than benzoic acid, and the absorption bands are not destroyed when the dilution is equal to 1 part in 4,000,000. This gives further support to the theory that the carboxyl group possesses special absorptive powers. Phthalic acid stands in the same relation to benzoic acid as oxalic acid to acetic acid, and benzoic acid and phenol are related in the same manner as acetic acid and alcohol. * ‘Archives des Sciences Physique et Naturelles,’ Geneva, 1878. t ‘ Phil. Trans.,’ 1879, 257. July 17, 1680.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 55 From the examination of various substances Hartley lias arrived at the conclusion that the production of absorption bands is due to the double linking of three pairs of carbon atoms in a closed chain, as is generally assumed in the graphic formula of benzene. h-c-c-h II II h-c c-h H— (Uc— H Compounds having two adjacent carbon atoms doubly linked as in ethylene CH2 II CHo do not exhibit absorption bands, neither do compounds having two carbon atoms trebly linked, as is assumed with acetylene. CH i Absorption bands only occur, as far as experiments have shown, when the compound contains a closed chain of three pairs of doubly linked carbon atoms. When hydrocarbons contain six or more carbon atoms the atoms admit of the three following arrangements, so as to form a closed ring : — (1) . The six carbon atoms may be singly linked, as in the case of camphor. This compound as well as cam¬ phoric acid exhibits no absorption bands. (2) . Two pairs of atoms may be doubly linked, as is assumed in the case of the terpenes. Neither the ter- penes, nor their oxidized or hydrated derivatives, occasion any absorption bands, although they possess in a marked degree the power of absorbing the ultra-violet rays, which power increases as the number of carbon atoms in the molecule; thus terpenes of the constitution C15H24 possess a greater absorptive power than those of the formula Ca«Hie. (3) . Three pairs of carbon atoms may be doubly linked, as in the case of benzene. Bodies having this consti¬ tution, as has been noticed before, yield characteristic absorption bands. As might be expected from the generally adopted formulae of naphthalene and anthracene, the absorption bands are much stronger than those of benzene. Naph¬ thalene is considered to be formed by the union of two benzene nuclei, as the formula represents. H-C-C-H II II H-C C-H I I c=c I I H-C C-H II II C-C I I H H A solution of one part of naphthalene in 60,000 pro¬ duces four characteristic absorption bands. Anthracene has the following constitution : — H-C-C-H II II H-C C-H C = C I I h-c-c-h I I c=c I I H-C C-H II II H-C-C-H The absorption bands are shown by a solution of anthra¬ cene containing one part of anthracene in 50,000,000 of glacial acetic acid. Hartley and Huntington* have examined the action of a number of essential oils upon the ultra-violet rays. The following oils and hydrocarbons transmit con¬ tinuous spectra : — Australene from oil of turpentine. Birch bark. Cajuputene dihydrate. Caraway hydrocarbon, No. 2. Cedrat hydrocarbon. Calamus. Citron. Citronella. Cedar wood. Nutmeg hydrocarbon. Cubebs. Elder. Hesperidene from oil of orange-peel. Indian geranium. Juniper. Lavender. Lign aloes. Melaleuca ericifolia. Menthol from oil of mint. Terebene. Vitivert. Patchouli, oil of (1 and 2). Rose, otto of. Rosemary, Santal wood. Terebenthene. Cajuputene hydrate, which is the principal constituent of oleum cajuputi, B.P., is probably a terpene of the for¬ mula C10Hlfi. Oleum carui, B.P., is a mixture of two hydrocarbons, one of which, No. 2, is probably a terpene of the formula Oil of citronella is chiefly composed of citronellol, which is a body probably isomeric with camphor. Oil of cubebs contains a terpene of the formula Ci5H24. Most of the other substances have similar constitu¬ tions and, as expected, do not produce absorption bands. Hydrocarbons showing the absorption bands of cymene (C10H14) : Thyme. Nutmeg. Lemon. Caraway, No. 1. Cymene is a higher homologue of the benzene series, and exhibits characteristic absorption bands. Substances showing strong bands of absorption in the spectrum transmitted by dilute solutions : — Oil of aniseed. Oil of bay. Oil of bergamot. Oil of bitter almonds. Oil of cassia. Oil of cloves. Carvol from caraway oil. Myristicol from nutmeg oil. Patchouli, blue oil of. Oil of peppermint. Oil of pimento. Oil of thyme. These substances nearly all contain compounds having the benzene nucleus; thus oils of bay, pimento and cloves contain eugenol, C6H3OHOCH3C3H5 ; oil of cassia, cin¬ namic aldehyde, C6H5C2H2COH ; oil of aniseed, anethol, C6H4OCH3C3H5; oil of thyme, thymol C6H3OHCH3C3H7; and cymene C10H14 Bergamot is known to contain hes¬ peridene, a terpene of the formula C10Hj6, and another hydrocarbon which, from these experiments, is probably a derivative of benzene. Menthol, carvol and myristicol (C10H14O) have been shown to be isomeric (Gladstone) ; ' *' CProc. Roy. Soc.,’ 1879, 200~. 56 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [July 17, 1S80. the nucleus of the former from its action upon the ultra¬ violet rays is probably a terpene, whilst benzene is the nucleus of the two latter. Prom the varying action of essential oils upon the ultra¬ violet rays they may be distinguished, if diluted with alcohol, before observation is made. Bodies of the aro¬ matic series will be distinguished by their absorption bands, and terpenes by the transmission of continuous spectra. General Conclusions : — Every increment of CH2 in a homologous series of alcohols, acids, etc., is accompanied by an absorption of the more refrangible ultra-violet rays, the amount of spectrum transmitted being inversely as the number of carbon atoms in the molecule. Absorption bands only occur when three pairs of carbon atoms are doubly linked in a closed chain. The terpenes of the formula C10H16 and C15H24 both possess a great absorptive action upon the ultra-violet rays, the action of the latter being the greatest. Isomeric terpenes generally transmit spectra which differ in length or in other respects on dilution. Compounds containing the benzene nucleus exercise a greater absorptive power than the terpenes upon the ultra-violet rays, and produce absorption bands which are characterized by their intensity. Isomeric bodies containing the benzene nucleus produce bands which differ in position and in intensity. Mr. W. Elborne then took the chair while Mr. R. H. Parker made his Report upon Materia Medica, the subject being “Spurious Gums Imported with Myrrh.” The paper will be found on p. 41. Mr. C. H. Hutchinson then delivered his Report on Inorganic Chemistry on “The Formulae of some In¬ organic Substances,” being a continuation of a former report upon vapour densities at high temperatures. This report will be published in a future number of this Journal. The meeting then adjourned. SOCIETY OF ARTS. The Chemistey op Bread-Making.* BY PROFESSOR GRAHAM, D.SC. {Continued from page 39.) Lecture IV. I have, at last, arrived at that stage of the course which, I fear, many of you must have thought I might have come to before ; but when one considers the very important and somewhat obscure phenomena underlying the baker’s art, I think that the careful study of the properties of the different substances entering into the composition of bread, and of the very interesting pheno¬ mena connected with the hydration-products formed in the panification process, will be deemed of sufficient importance to justify the time that I have given to this preliminary part of the subject. I, therefore, proceed this evening to the manufacture of bread, giving you a short outline of the process ; but I do not propose to discuss at much length this part of the subject, because we shall have ample matter to consider, irrespective of the technical details of bread making. I must preface my brief description of the process by the statement that bakers, in different parts of England, employ different methods in their art, and probably many here present, who are practical men, and who have done me the honour of attending this course, will find in some points — perhaps not many — that I do not describe the particular method they follow ; but, for the purposes of a general audience, I think it will be advisable to take bread-making as known in London, or in the West- end of London, as an illustration of the art generally. * Cantor Lectures : Delivered November and December, 1879. Reprinted from the Journal of the Society of Arts. The first part of the process consists in the preparation of what is technically called the “ ferment.” I ought to say, first of all, that a sack of flour weighs 280 lbs., and that a sack will turn out about 90 to 94 loaves of 4 lbs. each, according to the quality of the flour ; so that I shall deal with a sack of flour as the unit of the operation which I shall proceed to describe. Bakers themselves, inasmuch as it is much more convenient to measure water than to weigh flour, are in the habit of speaking not so- much of the flour employed as of the water. The first- part of the process is the preparation of the ferment. This consists in taking potatoes, about 6 lbs. to 8 lbs. to the sack — some use as much as 12 lbs. — and the potatoes should be, of course, well selected, mealy, not waxy or unripe and ill-matured. These are well washed, then boiled, in order to burst the cell walls of the potato starch. After they have been boiled thoroughly, they are mixed with additional water, and then put into a fermenting tub, and when the temperature of the water and of the mashed potato has cooled to 85° Fahr., the yeast is added. One quart of brewers’ yeast is employed to the sack of flour, and, in addition to this, a pound or two of flour is added to supply albuminous food to the yeast, and this constitutes the “ferment.” Fermentation commences, the soluble starch — the properties of which I have previously described — is affected partly by the direct action of the yeast, and partly by the action set up by the yeast-ferment on the soluble albuminoids in the flour which has been added, and the result is the hydra¬ tion of the starch and the conversion of the starch into the sugars and dextrin, which I have described so fully. This process goes on for some five hours ; it rises during that time, and at about the end of five hours, varying a little with the temperature, the head falls in. The head having fallen in, it is allowed to remain in a quiescent condition for two or three hours, and then the baker proceeds to the next stage, which is called the preparation of the “sponge.” They call it “stirring the sponge.” In the preparation of the sponge, about one-fourth of the total flour — or one-third according to the practice of those bakers who prefer a stiffer sponge — is taken. This is placed in the trough, and the “ferment” is added, along with some more water at 85° Fahr., the whole of the ferment being forced through a sieve, to remove the skins of the potatoes used, and thus the skins do not come into contact with the sponge. The potato skins and flour on the sieve are well washed by the water here added. The total amount of water used in the ferment and sponge stages being about half of the whole amount used for the sack of flour, this amount is about 60 quarts, varying somewhat with the character of the flour. Thus, up to and including the “ sponge,” one-fourth — or one- third according to some bakers — of the flour and some 30 to 32 quarts of water have been used. In the preparation of the sponge, some bakers — not many, but still some who occupy a prominent position in the trade — add a part of the salt, I have been told, about one-half of the total salt ; but probably this will depend entirely upon the temperature, as, for example, whether it is winter time or summer. The object of the salt is to check somewhat the activity of the ferment, and I shall presently allude to this matter again, because many bakers do not adopt the plan of adding salt at this particular stage. The sponge being made, it is allowed to go on ferment¬ ing for some time. At the end of about an hour it increases visibly in size, and this increase, due to the production of carbonic acid gas, causes it, at the end of about five hours, to “break.” When the mass has risen to its fullest extent, the sponge breaks, owing to the escape of some of the carbonic acid gas, and, having broken and fallen down, it commences to rise again, and in about another hour, varying somewhat according to the temperature at the time, or of the room, the sponge rises again, and breaks again. This is called the second break. So soon as it has broken a second time, the -July 17, 1880.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 57 remaining part of the flour — which would be about three- fourths, or two-thirds, according to the practice followed by the baker — and the remainder of the water are added. We pass thus to the dough. The remainder of the flour having been added, and the remainder of the water, the whole is thoroughly well mixed, and it is at this stage when most bakers add the whole of the salt. Other bakers only use that which remains over after having employed a little at the sponge stage. The total quantity of salt used I find to be about 3 lbs. to the sack, or 48 ounces, which would give about half an ounce of salt to the 4 lb. loaf of bread. This part of the operation of bread-making entails a very great deal of hard manual labour, and it has, therefore, often been proposed that •one should introduce machinery, with a view to lessening the amount of mechanical labour. There was exhibited at our last meeting an instrument, the invention of Mr. Pfleiderer, which seems to be a very successful piece of •machinery. My business, however, is not to discuss the mechanical advantages of this piece of machinery or that, but rather to confine myself to the chemical phenomena. I did hear an objection to it, that, in order to be a really useful instrument, it would require to have other power than manual, but those of you who are practically interested in the matter must judge of this for your¬ selves. The dough having been thoroughly well worked is now left for one hour, in order to rise again. It is then scaled; that is, it is cut and weighed off in proper quantity and made up into loaves. By the time a large batch of bread has been scaled and made up, of course, the previous ^portions are ready for the oven. They are then put into the oven, and are there heated for about an hour and a half, the temperature of the oven at the time of the introduction of the bread varying from about 400° Fahr. to 450° Fahr. Of course, that is not the temperature of the bread, because the bread contains water, and there¬ fore, it rises little, if at all, above the ordinary tempera¬ ture of boiling water. There are some modifications of this process as just described. First of all, some bakers use the whole of the salt in the stage which is called the preparation of the dough ; whereas, as I have pointed out, some use a part of the salt at an earlier stage, namely, in the sponge stage. Again, some use a thicker sponge, some use as much as one-third of the total flour, and others only one-fourth. Again, some employ what is called patent yeast, instead of brewers’ yeast. Patent yeast is made by taking an infusion of malt and boiling that with hops, and then, when it is sufficiently cooled, yeast is added, and in that way young active yeast cells are formed. Those who employ patent yeast take, I believe, about 6 lbs. of this patent yeast — in winter 7 lbs. — to the sack of flour. One other point, to which I need only briefly allude, is the preparation of what are called fancy breads, more especially the beautiful rolls and loaves introduced during the last few years to the London public in imitation of the bread made in Vienna, and afterwards in Paris. These fancy breads are fermented, not with the ordinary brewers’ yeast, but with German yeast ; and the process — as 1 understand, followed by almost every one — is, to - make the ‘ ‘ ferment ” first. This ferment is made with potatoes, and also with brewers’ yeast, as usual, but, in the sponge stage, German yeast is employed, and a con¬ siderable quantity, so that the fermentation is very rapid, and thus one obtains very large, light, and porous bread. I will now briefly consider the chemical changes of the process. In the first place, in the preparation of the ferment, I said that potato, or fruit, as it is technically termed in the trade, is employed. N o w, this is not used for the purpose of adulteration, nor is it used for the purpose -of increasing the profit. On the contrary, very often the baker has to give a very much greater price for the starch in the potato than for the starch in flour or in rice, for it would be much cheaper for him to buy cereals for this purpose. His object is this. With the exception of the maranta arrowroot and the tous-les-mois arrow- root, potato starch is the largest of the starches, and it readily lends itself to the expansive action which takes place in boiling. On bursting, the granular matter, the starchy matter of the cells exudes from the ruptured cell- wall, as I have pointed out to you before ; and it is only on the starch after it has been made in this soluble form that the soluble ferments of the yeast can act. Therefore, the baker has found out for himself long before science was able to teach him — I do not know how old the custom is, but certainly long before science could have taught him — the baker found out for himself the advantage of using a small weight of potatoes to develop the fermenting organisms required to do the work of converting a sack of 280 lbs. of flour into bread. Now, in 8 lbs. of potatoes there is only, at the very outside, one-fifth of its weight of starch, and one-fifth of 8 lbs. is but a very small quantity when dealing with 280 lbs. of flour ; and manifestly, then, this arises from some other reason than a desire to substitute a cheap material for a dearer. Its real value is to enable the baker to obtain an active propagation of the yeast, and to enable him to get a larger quantity of sugars and dextrin formed in a given quantity of time than if he were to employ flour only. I believe, in some cases, bakers also scald a little flour, in order to obtain some soluble starch in that way, in addition to the employment of potato. During the preparation of the ferment, which lasts something like eight hours, there is a continuous action, to which I called your attention at our last meeting, when I showed you, from the analyses of Mr. Henry Brown, that soluble albuminoids, in the presence of moisture at about 100°, and also at 85°, gradually become degraded, less and less complex, and, therefore, more and more mobile ; and this action converts soluble starch into those more hy¬ drated products, maltose and dextrin, which I described to you at our second meeting. The ferment having been much increased by the treat¬ ment with the potato and the small quantity of flour employed, the next stage is the preparation of the sponge. Here the baker adds a portion of the flour, either one- third or one-fourth, according to his custom, and, of course, a portion of the water. This is thoroughly intermixed, and so the fermenting action goes on ; partly upon the sugars already formed in the first or fermenting stage, and partly also (and to a great extent with inferior flours) upon the albuminoids and starch of the flour added in stirring the sponge. The third stage is what I will call, chemically, the inactive stage. I do not mean to say that no change goes on, but that, as compared with the very great chemical activity of the fermenting stage, and the power¬ ful fermenting activity of the sponge stage, we may call the dough stage— when it is made thick and firm, and when salt is added in order to check further action — the inert stage, the object now being that there shall be no more degradation of the albuminoids, no more breaking- up of the complex starch into simpler molecular group¬ ings. Sufficient of the sugar has been formed to carry on all that is required at this particular stage. The period given for the carrying on of the fermentation is only about an hour, and then the dough is put into the oven in order that the action shall be stopped ; but, of course, before it is stopped, the temperature acts on the globules of carbonic acid gas ; they expand under the heat, and so they lift the bread, and they are able to lift it on account of the resisting elastic property which the gluten of the wheat possesses. The first object aimed at by the baker in the process of bread-making, is to get a thoroughly good aeration < the finished bread, so that it shall be light, not heavy, that the air spaces which lighten it shall not be large, but that there shall be a large quantity of smaller air¬ spaces, and to obtain, in other words, a well -piled, well- aerated bread. The next point the baker aims at is to have as little colour produced in the pacification process 58 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [July 17, 18S0 and in the oven process as possible, and his object in endeavouring to obtain as little as possible of coloured products is, doubtless, derived from the fact that inferior flours are pre-eminently prone to give coloured products, and the world at large has come to conclude that high- coloured bread is due, of course, to inferior flour. These are by no means the only objects that the baker has in view: he also desires to obtain a loaf that has a nice aroma, and a sweet, I think they call it a “nutty,” taste on the palate. The use of salt is a very interesting discovery on the part of the unscientific baker. The baker found out the value of it long ago, and also in this case before there was any science to tell him of it. In a very interesting lecture, delivered some few years ago by Mr. Callard, a baker of well recognized eminence in the trade, it was pointed out that the salt might be compared to the bridle, and the yeast to the whip, that the one was a check on the other, and that by a judicious use of salt at the dif¬ ferent stages, one could guide and arrest the fermen¬ tation. I proceed now to a matter which must have arisen in the minds of all of you. What is the cause of fermenta¬ tion ? To what is this production of carbonic acid gas due, and to what is the production of alcohol which is always noticed in the fermentation of bread due ? I will not detain you long with a matter which has interested scientific men for many years ; but inasmuch as it is an exceedingly interesting branch of science, I think it well to give you a short account of the various views which have been held upon this question, and to point out to you the knowledge we now possess in regard to it. The first philosophical explanation of alcoholic fermentation was that given by Stahl and Willis. They said that alcoholic fermentation was due to a peculiar motion im¬ parted from the degrading body to a body in its neigh¬ bourhood, and the body receiving this peculiar impulse or motion was degraded from a complex structure to structures more and more simple. This idea that a body having a peculiar kind of motion or vibration can com¬ municate to another body in its neighbourhood the same kind of vibration or motion is certainly not unphilo- sophical. For example, if we were to take a rod of iron, say, a small poker, and suspend it by a string in the middle of this room, so that the pointed end would be directed to this side of the room, which is the north side, and were then to tap the poker for a short time with a small hammer, or piece of wood eveD, we should find that the poker becomes possessed of properties which it did not manifest before. Thus, if we were to suspend it in any other room in London, or in England, the pointed end Avould be directed to the north side of the room when free to swing. The extent to which it would manifest this peculiar property would depend on the amount of tapping, and the conditions observed by the operator, and for a time the poker would retain this peculiar tendency of pointing north and south. Now, by this peculiar mode of tapping the poker, we set up a number of vibrations, which would, under ordinary circumstances, produce no manifest effect on the poker, but, because we placed the poker at right angles to the diurnal rotation of the earth, then we have those vibrations compelled to take a peculiar, and, as we term it, polar arrangement, so that the vibrations circle round the axis of the poker, and the result is that, for some time, that poker acts as a magnetic needle. In much the same way, if I had a large finger-glass, and if I were to strike a particular note on the string of a fiddle, I could compel that glass, supposing I knew its dominant key, also to give forth the same note as the one I had produced from the string of the fiddle. Doubtless, there are many other instances you may, yourselves, think of in support of the idea of Stahl and Willis. This idea was taken up by Liebig and by others, who developed it to a considerable extent. Liebig said that the peculiar kind of motion was an oxidation action, that it was due to the oxidation of complex albuminoids, and by the oxidation of albuminoids he accounted for alcoholic fer¬ mentation of saccharine molecules, and for the fact that the sugars, therefore, were broken up into alcohol and carbonic acid, or, at a higher temperature into lactic acid and acetic acid. The view of Stahl and Willis would, at the present day, account for the peculiar action of the hydration of starch, but it certainly does not account for the alcoholic fermentation. While these views were held so recently, strangely enough, in 1680, a Dutchman, Leuwenhoeck, contended that yeast consisted of minute globules. The matter was forgotten, however, for micro¬ scopes in those days were not of very great power, until the year 1837, when Cagnard de la Tour, and also Schwann, corroborated by Kutzing, distinctly proved that yeast was a cellular organism. But the great Work¬ man in this field of investigation has been Pasteur, to whose labours throughout a long period of his life, labours carried out even at the sacrifice, to a great extent, of his health, and certainly to the injury of his sight, we owe the true clue to the nature of alcoholic and many other fermentations. The problem whence come ferments has been, to a great extent, answered by Pasteur. If you take an ordinary grape, well -grown in the south of Europe, you will find a beautiful bloom upon it. That bloom partly consists of minute organisms and dust that has fallen on to the skin of the grape. Now, Pasteur proved that it was this dust adhering to the outside of the grape that set up fermentation in the expressed juice of the grape. I will not detain you by a long account of his work, but I will merely say that, in the first place, he so arranged his experiment that he could take from the inside of the grape a part of the juice without any trace of the dust on the skin coming in contact with it. He found when that juice was put in small tubes, and in tubes which had been previously heated so that there should be no trace of organized dust existing in them, and with proper means taken to prevent any more dust getting into such a tube, the juice would not ferment* On the other hand, when he took a small portion of the dust of the skin of the grape, and added it to the juice from the interior of the grape, he got vinous fermenta¬ tion. The juice was converted into wine by alcoholic fermentation. Not only does the grape contain this minute ferment on the skin, but also the dust of the air generally contains the spores of ferments, and ferments themselves, which may produce alcoholic, butyric, ropy, or other kinds of fermentation. Not long ago, in England, it was customary in Dorsetshire to allow the wort made from malt to spontaneously ferment, and, if you go over to Brussels, even at the present day, you will find there beers well known in Belgium under the names of Lambic and Faro, produced by spontaneous fermentation. After the wort has been made it is placed in large tuns, and whatever dust falls from the atmosphere goes into the large hole at the top, and sets up fermentation. The old pi'ocess of making bread by means of leaven was also a haphazard process of the same kind; that is, you could not predict exactly what kind of organisms would follow. The result is, as you know, that the old leavened bread was certainly by no means a sweet, pleasant bread, and those who have had the misfortune to drink Lambic and Faro must know how sour and bad they are. I said that the old leaven contains alcoholic organisms. These have been carefully examined by Engel, and he has given them the term Saccharomyces minor, because they are smaller than the ordinary beer yeast, called Saccharo¬ myces Cerevisice. These names may seem somewhat long for organisms so small. I am unable to make use of simpler terms, however, without running the danger of confusion. The Saccharomyces minor, discovered by Engel in leaven, measures only yooxxfrti1 of an inch in diameter. It is an alcoholic organism, and produces spirit and carbonic acid like the ordinary beer yeast ; at present, however, we have no knowledge of the ratio of alcohol to gas. Along with these organisms in leaven occur also July 17, 1880.J THE PHAEMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 59 the common beer yeast, and numerous organisms of disease, producing lactic, acetic and butyric acids, also the ropy organisms ; indeed, left to chance as the leaven process is, we may expect numerous sources of diseased action. Thus, the spontaneous fermentation of bread (and the leaven process is eventually this) as with the Belgian beer, leaves us the sport of chance. {To be continued.) Iparlhtmcniiirii antr iCitto ^Irotecbings, Prosecution under the Weights and Measures Act. At the Ledbury Petty Sessions, on July 7, 1880, before John Hopton, Esq., Chairman, Rev. J. Buckle, Colonel Webb, and Dr. Henry, Ernest Freeman, pharmaceutical chemist, of Ledbury was charged — “That on the 10th day of June last, at the parish of Ledbury, he unlawfully had in his possession for use for trade a certain false or unjust weight, intending to represent 14 pounds, contrary to the form of the statute in such case made and provided.” Mr. Glaisyer, Birmingham, Solicitor of the Chemists and Druggists’ Trade Association of Great Britain, con¬ ducted the defence. Inspector Blunsdon, inspector of weights and measures for the district, deposed that on the 10th June last he visited the shop of Mr. Freeman and examined all the weights in the shop. Witness then asked the assistant if there were no more weights, and he said yes, there was a 1 4 lb. weight. Witness believed he said it was upstairs. He then went away and fetched it ; he was away about a couple of minutes. Witness tested the weight and found it was 3 drachms deficient. Chairman of the Bench: Was it a weight that had been long in use ? — It appeared like it, sir. Cross-examined by Mr. Glaisyer : The witness said that he examined the weights in the shop first, and found them all correct. There was a 1 4 lb. weight in the shop, and that was right weight. Mr. Glaisyer : My defence in this case is a very simple one. It is that this weight, which is admitted by the in¬ spector to have been fetched from upstairs, is not used at all for the purposes of sale or purchase, but was simply used by defendant to roughly weigh the ingredients which he inserts into two substances which he prepares, namely, pig food and horse powders. It is not used in the shop at all, and therefore I think there is no case, as this summons allege^, and is bound to allege, that the weight is used for trade. Trade by the terms of the Act is stated to be sale and purchase, and I think if I can prove these facts to the satisfaction of the bench, that they will see their way to dismiss the summons. They will bear in mind that the weights found in defendant’s shop were on the inspector’s own admission found perfectly accurate, and that amongst these weights was a 1 4 lb. weight, which was used by him for selling his goods. Harry Chard, a servant of the defendant, recollected the inspector visiting his master’s shop. The superin tendent came in, and asked for their weights. Witness put the weights before him that were in the shop. He tested them, and found them all right. He then asked if they had not some more weights. Witness said yes, one 14 lb. weight upstairs in the warehouse. He asked witness to fetch it, and witness told him they did not sell with it, but only used it for weighing things for pig food and horse ppwders. He said never mind, you fetch it. Witness said they only used it for mixing pig food and powders. He again told him to fetch it, which witness then did, and he said it was half a drachm light. Now as a matter of fact is this 14 lb. weight also kept upstairs ? — Yes. Is it used to sell by ? — No. Do you test by it anything that is purchased ? — No. Is the only purpose for which it is used that of weigh¬ ing substances for mixing into those powders which you have spoken of ? — Yes. Had it ever been taken down into the shop for any other purpose except to be produced to the inspector ? — No. Is it never used in the shop ? — Never. Mr. Glaisyer : I am prepared to call another witness to verify the boy’s statement if the bench think it necessary. Chairman of the Bench : The decision of the bench in this case is that the summons be dismissed, but no costs will be allowed, as we think the inspector was justified in the course he has taken. Mr. Glaisyer : I presume the weight in question will be returned to the defendant ? Chairman of the Bench : Yes, certainly. An Elementary Text Book or Botany. Translated from the German of Dr. K. Prantl, and revised by Dr. S. H. Vines. London: W. Swan Sonnenschein and Allen. 1880. The natural consequence of examinations is to lead students to follow in the lines indicated by the questions asked, and one need only glance at some of the published questions of the Science School and University examina¬ tions to see that botany has made great strides of late years, and that it has become necessary to learn many terms and many ideas only to be found in such recent text books as Sachs’ and Thome’s, or to search through the most recent papers in the Journal and Transactions of the Linnean Society , or other similar publications, if the knowledge required by the examiners is to be mastered. But Sachs’ text-book is one rather for reference than for regular reading, and a work which should equal it in advanced information, but be more easy to peruse, has for some time been felt to be a desideratum. Such a one is now offered to the botanical public, as may be gathered from the preface, in which Dr. Vines says : — “ This book was written by Professor Prantl to meet a growing demand for a work on botany, which, while less voluminous than the well known * Lehrfeuch ’ of Professor Sachs, should resemble it in its mode of treatment of the subjects, and should serve as an introduction to it.” This exactly re¬ presents the character of the present volume, which gives a kind of bird’s-eye view of the most advanced botanical knowledge of the present day in a clear and concise form. The book is divided into four parts, which treat respectively of the morphology, anatomy, physio¬ logy, and classification of plants. In the last part the author has adopted Sachs’ classifi¬ cation of the thallophytes in preference to that followed by Dr. Prantl, regarding the former as being of consider¬ able assistance to the student. That of the higher groups is based upon the system professed by Alexander Braun. In morphology the term scorpioid and helicoid, as applied to inflorescence, are used in a manner exactly opposite to that understood by the majority of English botanists. The book is written for the most pirt in a lucid style, and the typographical arrangements are excellent. In a few cases only the meaning becomes obscure from the condensed character of the wording. For instance, a berry is defined thus : — “ The endocarp is soft and juicy, as well as the mesocarp, so that the solitary hard seeds are imbedded in the pericarp.” The descriptions of fruits, and the explanation of their structure is one of the least satisfactory portions of the book, and the student who peruses it will find out for himself a truth which is generally recognized as regards chemistry, but too often forgotten by those who attempt to obtain a knowledge of botany, viz., that there are many facts which can only be learned by a 'practical course of study under an experi¬ enced teacher, and that books alone are not sufficient without examination of the objects themselves. 60 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [July 17, 1630 Tlie plants mentioned as examples of the different families are, it must be remembered, copied from the German work, and the remarks cencerning them do not always apply equally to this country. Thus Lycopodium annotinum is not one of the “ commonest species which occur in our woods.” Selaginella licit etica and S. spinulosa do not occur in this country “ on mountainous districts, on walls, and on the ground,” and Orthotrichum speciosum is not “ common on trees ” in this country, nor are Ophrys myodes and Epipogon Gmelini natives of this country, as might be supposed from the context. The grouping of the nearly allied families of plants into orders is an improvement which will probably greatly assist the student in obtaining a clearer view of the relationship of plants, although the changes in names and the use of new terms will be no welcome addition to our already overloaded botanical vocabulary, even if necessary for scientific examinations The woodcuts are in a few cases difficult to understand, C.g., the antherozoids of ferns ; but regarded as a whole the book is one that, in spite of its modest description as an “ elementary ” text-book, will be welcomed by many advanced students of botany, and may be safely recom¬ mended as a clear and useful exponent of the views held by botanists of the present day. Those whose regular botanical studies are over, but who meet with new terms not found in many of the text-books which have hitherto been regarded as standard works, such as zygomorphic, lysigenous, hypsophyllary, eucyclic, metabolism, etc., will find this work most useful for reference. It has also the recommendations of portability, moderate price, clear type, and lucid explanations of the terms used. The work will undoubtedly take a high position among botanical treatises for educational purposes. BOOKS, PAMPHLETS, ETC., RECEIVED. Traits d’Anesth^sie Chirurgicale, contenant la De¬ scription et les Applications de la Mdthode Anesthesique de M. Paul Bert. Par le docteur J. -B. Roltenstein. Paris: G. Bailliere and Co. 1880. Erom the Pub¬ lishers. Annuaire des Specialities Medicares et Pharmaceu- tiques. Paris. 1880. Erom the Editor. Jahresbericht uber die Eortschritte der Chemie und verwandter Theile anderer Wissenschaften. Eur 1878. Drittes Heft. Giessen: J. Ricker. 1880. Erom the Publisher. On Brain and Nerve Exhaustion. “Neurasthenia.” Its Nature and Curative Treatment. By Thomas Stretch Dowse, M.D., etc. London : Bailliere, Tindall and Cox. 1880. Erom the Publishers. Alcohol Tables, giving for all Specific Gravities, from l'OOOO to 0*7938, the Percentages of Absolute Alcohol, by Weight and Volume and of Proof Spirit. Calcu¬ lated by Otto Hehner, F.C.S., E.I.C., etc. London : J. and A. Churchill. 1880. From the Publishers. Hotcs anfr (Queries. [666]. ESS. COCHINEAL. — In reply to the inquiry of Mr. Cottrill, I recommend the old formula without any s. v. r., and adding a proportion of chloride of sodium, as recommended by Mr. Church, Pharmaceutical Journal , 2nd series, vol. vi., page 552. About half the quantity of salt there ordered will suffice, and produce an article which will remain sweet for many months. The fer¬ mentation spoken of is probably effervescence ; this may be prevented by continuing the ebullition of the liquid until the effervescence caused by the addition of the acid salts has ceased. R. Griffith. [666]. ESS. COCHINEAL. — In answer to Mr. Cottrill, I believe the reason which he seeks is that although the old formula may be followed, the old fashioned alum is not used. Ammonia alum, the kind in general use, may and probably does yield traces of free ammonia when boiled with carbonate of potash, as in making the essence ; this would induce putridity in animal matter accompany¬ ing it, either in the case given or in others — egg liniments, for instance. From this drawback the use of potash alum is entirely free, and I have now by me a sample of ess. cocci prepared with potash alum on May 1, 1875, which is covered with a firm mouldy crust, but is entirely free from taint. J. F. Brown. [669] . FROTHING FOR FERMENTED LIQUIDS. — Will some one be kind enough to furnish “ A ” with a recipe for making a fluid for giving a permanent head to ginger beer, ginger ale, ale, beer, and fermented ginger beer which will keep in any climate and not turn turbid ? [670] . BLACK WRITING INK.— “Nemo” would be glad if any reader of the Journal will oblige him with a formula for making good permanent black writing ink that would not deposit on keeping, as the ink made from galla and ferri sulph. does. jUspcnring Iftcntanroiia. In order to assist as much as possible our younger brethren, for whose sake partly this column was established , considerable latitude is allowed, according to promise, in the propounding of supposed difficulties. But the right will be exercised of excluding too trivial questions, or re¬ petitions of those that have been previously discussed in principle. And we would suggest that those who meet with difficulties should before sending them search previous numbers of the Journal to see if they can obtain the re¬ quired information. [434]. R. S. T. will be obliged for information con¬ cerning the following prescription : — R Quinise Disulph . gr. xxv. Liq. Ferri Phosph. Magnet. (Light- foot’s steel) . 3ivss* Aquse . ad ^iij. M. ft. mist. My customer states that it has been made up without any precipitate. I find the quinine to dissolve almost entirely in the mixture of liq. ferri phosph. and aq.; but upon standing, a copious precipitate forms. Camspaiitrcnte, No notice can be taken of anonymous communica¬ tions. Whatever is intended for insertion must be authenti¬ cated by the name and address of the writer ; not necessarily for publication, but as a guarantee of good faith. X Y. Z. — The formula for the Syrup of the Phosphates was reprinted in extenso from Parrish’s 4 Practical Pharmacy* in the Pharmaceutical Journal for April 22, 1871, p. 857. Applications for books from the library should be sent to the Librarian. M. P. S. — We think there are other books better suited for the purpose, for instance, Attfield’s 1 Chemistry, General, Medical, and Pharmaceutical’ (Van Voorst). Nemo. — For recipe for ruby liquid see vol. x., p. 40. Communications, Letters, etc., have been received from Messrs. Golding, Harvey, Parker, Richardson, Hughes, Nemo, Country Druggist, Inquirer. July 24, 1880.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 61 CIjc central Journal - 4 - SATURDAY , JULY 24, 1830. Communications for the Editorial department of this Journal , hooks for review , etc., should he addressed to the Editor, 17, Bloomsbury Square. Instructions from Members and A ssociates respecting the transmission of the Journal should he sent to Mr. Elias Bremridob, Secretary, 17, Bloomsbury Square, W.C. A dvertisements, and payments for Copies of the Journal, Messrs. Churchill, New Burlington Street, London, W, Envelopes indorsed “ Pharm. Joum.” COMPANIES AND THE PHARMACY ACT. After another long trial of patience the question raised by the Council of the Pharmaceutical Society in the prosecution of the London and Provincial Supply Association (Limited), for alleged infringe¬ ment of the Pharmacy Act, 1868, came before the House of Lords last Tuesday, and after the argu¬ ments of counsel on both sides had lasted during the greater part of that day and Thursday, the decision given just at the moment of our going to press has supported the previous judgment of the Lords Justices, against which the Pharmaceutical Society had appealed to the House of Lords. This litigation is therefore now at an end, and the result is one leaving the Pharmaceutical Society powerless to prevent the continuance of limited liability companies to carry on the business of a chemist and druggist, so far at least as the Pharmacy Act, 1868, is concerned, and it now only remains to consider whether there are not other means by which the true object and intention of that Act will admit of being secured. This further question will doubtless engage at an early period the attention of the Council and of the Committee that is en¬ trusted with the inquiry into the amendment of the Pharmacy Acts. In our present issue we give a full report of the arguments brought forward by Mr. Benjamin ou the part of the Pharmaceutical Society during the first day’s hearing, and in the Journal of next week we shall publish the remainder of the proceedings, so that our readers may be able to follow the course of the arguments on both sides, as well as to become acquainted with the opinions of the Lord Chancellor and the other members of the Court of Appeal. This report will doubtless be read with deep interest by all members of the trade and will furnish matter for consideration by local associations of chemists and druggists, as well as by the Council itself. It would be premature to speculate now upon the possible result of these deliberations, and we will therefore confine ourselves to stating what seems to be the result of the decision arrived at by the House of Lords. Third Series, No. 526. As regards the contention -of Mr. Benjamin, that a corporation was not to be excused from compliance with the provisions of the Pharmacy Act on the ground that it could not become qualified as the Act directs, it was argued by him to be most consistent with the spirit of the Act to hold that a corporation could not lawfully carry on the business of a chemist and druggist. But it was held by the House of Lords that this would be lawful provided that the persons actually selling or compounding drugs and medicines were themselves qualified and on the Register of Chemists and Druggists. Consequently, the decision of the House of Lords in favour of limited liability companies being at liberty to carry on the business of a chemist and druggist is qualified by the important condition that the persons em¬ ployed by such companies to sell or to compound meclicines must be qualified in accordance with the Pharmacy Act. This is certainly calculated to ope¬ rate as some mitigation of the mischief to be appre¬ hended if a limited liability company Avere free to carry on business altogether independent of the Pharmacy Act, and Lord Blackburn very clearly stated his opinion that if such a company had not a qualified manager to conduct the selling the com¬ pany would be liable under the Act. To a great extent, therefore, we may take it as having been established by the decision now given by the House of Lords that it is in a general way expedient and desirable for the safety of the public that the provisions of the Pharmacy Act should be respected. This question was left open by the judgment of the Lord Justices, and as we pointed out in a previous article, it was the question which chiefly required consideration. The answer now given to it by the House of Lords may be regarded as a recognition of the principle which has always guided the action of the Pharmaceutical Society in seeking to restrict the conduct of pharmaceutical business to such persons as were properly qualified for the purpose. At the same time it must be stated that, in the course of the hearing of the appeal, there were some indications of a tendency to regard the Pharmacy Act less in the light of a measure for ensuring the safety of the public than as one for the protection of a class of traders by upholding for them a monopoly of the trade in drugs. If, in future, co-operative stores and limited liability companies are to be free to carry on the business of a chemist and druggist it would seem that they must do so in some way under the supervision of the Pharmaceutical Society similar to that hitherto exercised by it in regard to indivi¬ dual traders ; and, inasmuch as the existing Phar¬ macy Act does not contain any provisions specifically relating to the conduct of the business of a chemist and druggist under such conditions it may be neces¬ sary, by further legislation, to provide for this being done in a manner consistent with the spirit of the present Act. 62 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [July 24, 1880. Crausactions of f be |j barmaautical j^oaetir. EXAMINATIONS IN LONDON. July 8, 1880. Present — Mr. Schacht, Vice-President; Messrs. Allchin, Barnes, Benger, Brady, Carteighe, Corder, Gale, T. E. Greenish, Linford, Martindale, Plowman, Southall and Taylor. MAJOR EXAMINATION. Ten candidates were examined. Five failed. The following five passed, and were declared qualified to be registered as Pharmaceutical Chemists : — Bancroft, James . Halifax. Elborne, William . Grantham. Fazan, Charles Herbert . Colchester. F owler, William . Sunderland. Hardwick, Arthur . Sheffield. MINOR EXAMINATION. Thirteen candidates were examined. Ten failed. The following three passed, and were declared qualified to be registered as Chemists and Druggists: — Alexander, George . Liverpool. Bakewell, William Whitehorn. .Uttoxeter. Bell, George . Hull. MODIFIED EXAMINATION. One candidate was examined, but failed to pass. July 9, 1880. Present— Mr. Schacht, Vice-President ; Messrs. Allchin, Barnes, Benger, Brady, Carteighe, Corder, Gale, T. e! Greenish, Linford, Martindale, Plowman, Southall and Taylor. MAJOR EXAMINATION. Eleven candidates were examined. Nine failed. The following two passed, and were declared qualified to be registered as Pharmaceutical Chemists : — Hooper, David . Southwark. Slicer, Walter . Bingley. MINOR EXAMINATION. Fifteen candidates were examined. Eleven failed. The following four passed, and were declared qualified to be registered as Chemists and Druggists : — Biddles, William Byron . Reading. Bright, Frederick . Taunton. Burrows, Richard . London. Thomas, David Robert . Aberystwith. July 13, 1880. Present — Mr. Greenish, President ; Messrs. Allchin, Barnes, Benger, Brady, Carteighe, Corder, Gale, T. E. Greenish, Linford, Martindale, Plowman, Southall and Taylor. MAJOR EXAMINATION. 'Seven candidates were examined. One failed. The following six passed, and were declared qualified to be registered as Pharmaceutical Chemists Barnes, James William . Spalding. Price, Robert John . . . "Wrexham Smith, John Ord . Scarborough. Taylor, Fred . Exeter. Thornton, John . Aldridge. Wyatt, Charles Frederick .....’.Old Brompton. MINOR EXAMINATION. Eighteen candidates were examined. Thirteen failed. The following fire passed, and were declared qualified to be registered as Chemists and Druggists : _ Crompton, Henry . Bury. Elkington, William Alfred . Spalding. Evans, John . Carnarvon. Fentiman, Charles Henry . London. Gibson, Atkin Brewster . Grantham. July 14, 1880. Present — Mr. Greenish, President ; Messrs. Allchin, Barnes, Benger, Brady, Carteighe, Corder, Gale, T. E. Greenish, Linford, Martindale, Plowman, Southall and Taylor. Dr. Greenhow was also present, on behalf of the Privy Council. MINOR EXAMINATION. Twenty-six candidates were examined. Sixteen failed. The following ten passed, and were declared qualified to be registered as Chemists and Druggists: — Freeman, William Harrison ...Leeds. Grover, Sydney . Lower Norwood. Hamnett, Thomas . . London. Harrison, William . . Wisbeach. Hopkins, John Henry . Leicester. Knight, Thomas . Nottingham. Last, Alfred John . Rochford. Lawson, Arthur . Liverpool. Leicester, Frederick . . North wich. Livesey, James Thomas . Preston. July 15, 1880. Present —Mr. Schacht, Vice-President; Messrs. Allchin, Barnes, Benger, Brady, Carteighe, Corder, Gale, T. E. Greenish, Linford, Martindale, Plowman, Southall and Taylor. Dr. Greenhow was also present, on behalf of the Privy Council. MINOR EXAMINATION. Ttventy-six candidates were examined. Sixteen failed. The following ten passed, and were declared qualified to be registered as Chemists and Druggists : — Matthews, Charles William ...London. Mears, Henry . Eastover. Morgan, Albert Hall . Birmingham. Pearce, Thomas Ellery . Tavistock. Phipps, Frederick . Birmingham. Powell, Samuel John . Swansea. Preston, Henry . Mansfield. Puntan, Herbert Harding C. ...Turriff. Rendall, Theodore Stancombe... Torquay. Wilson, William Joseph . Oxford. July 16, 1880. Present — Mr. Schacht, Vice-President; Messrs. Allchin, Barnes, Benger, Brady, Carteighe, Corder, Gale, T. E. Greenish, Linford, Martindale, Plowman, Southall and Taylor. Dr. Greenhow was also present, on behalf of the Privy Council. MINOR EXAMINATION. Twenty -three candidates were examined. Nine failed. The following fourteen passed, and were declared qualified to be registered as Chemists and Druggists :— Jones, Samuel . . . Flint. Ross, Andrew Leighton . London. Routly, John . Brighton. Slater, William Martin . Ipswich. Smith, Lewis . Grassendale. Taberham, Frederick William.. .Wells. Thompson, James . Hull. Warner, Matthew Richard . Shrewsbury. Williams, Charles Edward . Bays water. Williamson, James . Ash. Wilson, Thomas Whiting . Harrogate. Woolcott, John Newton . Sidmouth. Woolliugs, Frank . London. Young, Pelham Charles . Salisbury. PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION. The undermentioned certificates were received in lieu of the Society’s Examination Certificate of the University of Cambridge. Gardner, Frederick William ...Newark. July 24, 1880.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 63 Certificate of the University of Oxford. Hicks, Joseph . Banbury. The report of the College of Preceptors on the examina¬ tion held on July 6, was received. Three hundred and forty-one candidates had presented themselves for examination, of whom one hundred and seventy -four had failed. The following one hundred and sixty -seven passed, and the Registrar was authorized to place their names upon the Register of Apprentices or Students : — (Arranged alphabetically). Acton, Samuel . Liverpool. Aubrey, Henry James . Leamington. Baker, Edmund Gilbert . London. Barlow, Arthur Edward . Rothwell. Barratt, Herbert . Snaith. Bates, John . Manchester. -Bax, Robert William . Rawtenstall. Beauchamp, Frederic Crawley... Hemel Hempsted. Bell, John Henry . Windsor. Be van, Tom Webb . London. Bird, John . Manchester. Birkett, Benjamin Brelesford ...Workington. Blenkinsop, John . Carlisle. Bromwich, Edmund George ...Birmingham. Brown, Charles Ezra . Morley. Buchan, David Donaldson . Stirling. Buckley, Walter . Manchester. Cairns, Peter . ...Galashiels. Caswell, Joseph Alban . Sedgley. Cooke, George Harry . Altrincham. Corrie, Thomas . Moniaive. Cossins, John Benjamin . Rhyl. Crofts, Robart . Canterbury. Crosth waite, Daniel . Blackpool. Davy, Arthur . Bradford. Day, Stephen . London. Day, William . . . Oswestry. Deans, George . London. Dell, Frederick Barton . Llanelly. Dobb, Thomas . Sheffield. Dorman, George . Ashford. Dorn, Thomas . Oxford. Drouet, Harry Anthony . Lower Norwood. Eastland, John . Margate. Edington, Alexander . Edinburgh. Elling worth, Alfred Thomas ...Bromsgrove. Ellis, Frederic Edward Evans. ..Kettering. Emms, Sidney Riley Wilson ...Chipping Sodbury. Evans, Josiah . Pencader. Fardon, Arthur Edwin . Bristol. Farrage, William Thomas R. ...Rothbury. Flanagan, Andrew . Richmond, Surrey. Fraser, John M . Inverness. Geary, Frederic Charles . Coalville. George, Isaac . Great Yarmouth. Graham, Gilbert . Girvan. Grant, John Merson . Cullen. Graves, Richard . London. Greenwood, William Joseph H. Cirencester. Griffiths, Cornelius Albert . Cinderford. Grigor, William George . Edinburgh. Hay, Arthur . Great Yarmouth. Haynes, Joseph Alfred . Fairford. Heale, Henry . London. Henderson, Isaac . Workington. Hickinbottom, John William ...Sleaford. Hill, Edward . Lower Tottenham. Holloway, William Alfred . Redruth. Holstius, Otto . London. Hood, Thomas . Leith. Hoyles, Henry Richardson . Sheffield. Hughes, Daniel . Holywell. Hughes, Joseph . Dyserth. Hunt, Oliver Kirby . Bath. Ingle, George . Bradford. Jackson, Frederick Daniel . Boston. James, Hugh . Bodedern. Jamieson, Simpson . St. Andrews. Johnson, John Mountfort . Leek. Jones, Evan . London. Jones, George Henry . Brighton. Jones, John Edmund . Llanerchymedd,, Jones. William Alexander . Stoke-on-Trent. Kay, James Spencer . Rochdale. Key worth, Alexr. Barrington... Bedford. Kir dan, Samuel . Blackburn. Langton, Wm. James Rivers ...Maidstone. Layman, Ernest Blakesley . Anerley. Lewis, David John . Aberystwith. Ligertwood, Alexander L . Johnstone. Llewellyn, Lewis Herbert . Shrewsbury. Low, Maxwell . Dumfries. Lucas, Edward William . Ashbourne. McGlashan, James . Edinburgh. McHarg, William Boyd . ...Glasgow. McKenzie, James . Fochabers. Manuel, Walter . Grimsby. Martin, William . Exeter. Massey, John, junr . Manchester. Mathieson, Robert . Aberdeen. Melville, Samuel Lightfoot . Liverpool. Menzies, Robert . Hardgate. Mitchell, Leonard Montague ...Bristol. Molineux, William . Preston. Morris, John Buchan . Stirling. Morton, Alexander . . . Edinburgh. Mossop, Samuel . Ashton-under-Lyne. Newdick, John . Ashford. Page, William Armstrong . Ironbridge. Passmore, William Edwin . Maidstone. Philpott, Frederick William ...London. Pirie, James Crichton . Arbroath. Polack, Emanuel . Rochester. Pottage, John William Dick ...Edinburgh. Potter, Charles Compton . London. Price, John Charles . Taffs Well. Prince, Henry Rhodes . ...Taunton. Pullan, Herbert Newman . Low Harrogate. Rackham, Frederick William... Norwich. Rainford, Walter . Blackburn. Reed, John William . St. Helens, Auckland, Reid, David . Montrose. Reynolds, Ernest Jame3..Milton-next-Sittingbourne. Richardson, George . Lancaster. Roberts, William . Bangor. Robertson, William . St. Andrews. Robson, William . Blaydon-on-Tyne. Rogers, Frank Ashley . Nottingham. Royston, Arthur S *ymour . Bentley. Rutherford, Thomas Melvill ...Peterborough. Saltmarsh, Mark Alfred . Deal. Sansom, Frederick James . Barrow-in-Furness* Sayer, Arthur . Huddersfield. Sharp, Stephen . Hey wood. Sherburne, John Chester . London. Slinn, Albert Edward . Rhyl. Smith, Joe Harry . Keighley. Smith, Walter Edward . Preston. Smout, Charles Lickfold . London. Spong, John Fuller . Leeds. Stiles, Theodore Mayo . Poole. Swift, Arthur Hayball . York. Swinton, Thomas Henry . Crewe. Tabor, Charles James . London. Thacker, Harry Ransley . Nottingham. Thomas, Edward . Garstang. Thomas, John Abraham . Cardiff. Thompson, Henry Edward . Sheffield. Thompson, John Park . Alston. Thomson, Alexander . Arbroath. G4 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [July 24, 1S80. Thomson, William . Cullen. Tillett, Arthur John . Market Rasen. Turnbull, William . Newcastle-on-l yne. Turner, John F . Ramsgate. Verity, Harry . Leeds. Waind, Walter Harry . Kirby Moorside. Wake, George . Howden. Wallace, William . Edinburgh. Walwin, Walter . Warminster. Ward, Albert Edward . Bradford. Warner, George 0 . Clifton. Watts, Joseph Wormall . Brighton. Weall, George Alexander . Preston. Wild, Tom Arthur . Hyde. Wilkinson, Robert . Kirkham. Wilkinson, Thomas . Crook. Willcocks, Arthur Squire . Portsea. Williams, Alfred Griffiths . Hereford. Williamson, Leonard Wright ...Darlington. Wilson, James . Chesterfield. Wilson, John Herbert . Downham Market. Wood, James Beaumont . Huddersfield. Woodcock, Page Ilornor . Norwich. Woods, Joseph James Birkett...Tunstall. Wright, David Morgan . Kirkcaldy. Wyatt, William . Mansfield. Young, Arthur . London. The questions for the examination were as follows: — Time allowed : Three Hours for the three subjects. I. LATIN. 1. Translate into English the following passages: — A. Ariovistus ad postulata Caesaris respondit : se prius in Galliam venisse, quam Populum Romanum. Nun- quam ante hoc tempus exercitum Populi Romani Galliae provinciae fines egressum. Quid sibi vellet ? Cur in suas possessiones veniret ? Provinciam suam hanc esse Galliam, sicut illaui nostram. Ut ipsi concedi non oporteret, si in nostros fines impetum faceret, sic item nos esse iniquos, qui in suo jure se interpellaremus. B. Itaque priusquam quicquam conaretur, Divitiacum ad se vocari jubet et, quotidianis interpretibus remotis, per Caium Valerium Procillum, principem Galliae pro¬ vinciae, farniliarem suum, cui summam omnium rerum fidem habebaJ, cum eo colloquitur : simul commonefacit, quae ipso j l’aesente in concilio Gallorum de Dumnorige sint dicta, et ostendit, quae separatim quisque de eo apud se dixerit : petit atque hortatur, ut sine ejus offensione animi vel ipse de eo, causa cognita, statuat, vel civitatem statuere jubeat. 2. Name the deponent verbs in the above extracts, and give the present, perfect and infinitive of each. 3. Decline in full se, hoc, ill am, ipsi, nos, qui, occurring in extract A. What is the person of qui ? 4. Translate into Latin: — (i.) At the break of day Caesar was distant from the camp of the enemy not further than fifteen hundred paces, (ii.) Having heard of the arrival of Caesar, Ariovistus sent ambassadors to him. (iii.) Then at length Ariovistus sent a part of his forces to attack the smaller camp, and there was sharp fighting on both sides until the evening. II. ARITHMETIC. [The working of these examples, as well as the answers, must be wiitten out in full.] 5. A mixture is made of 6 gallons of spirit at 12s. 6d. per gallon, 4 gallons at 18s. 9(7., and 10 gallons at 22s. 8c7. ; what is the value of a gallon of it ? 6. Find the value of f -~-l£— |-j-3-|ar. 7. Divide 15 by 625, by 6’25, and by ’625. 8. If the tax on a rent of £25 is £2 10s, what will it be on a rent of £10 9s. 4 \d. 9. How are the gramme and the litre, the units of weight and capacity, related to the metre , the unit of length ? III. ENGLISH. 10. Define a Pronoun. Classify Pronouns. Give the inflexions of the Personal Pronouns. 11. State clearly the difference between the four present forms — “ I write,” “ I am writing,” “ I have written,” and “ I have been writing,” — in respect of (a) the duration ; (b) the incompleteness or completeness of the action. 12. Name some verbs which are followed by the infinitive without “to.” 13. Parse the works in italics: — “Travel not early, before thy judgment be risen; lest thou observe rather shows than substance.” 14. Write a short composition on one of the following subjects : — “ The advantages of using the metric system,” “ The elements of a good character,” “ How to ventilate a room,” “ Bicycling.” The following is a list of the centres at which the examination was held, showing the number of candidates at each centre and the result : — - Candidates. a T3 •d TJ QJ G X S CD X Cu N Lancaster . .13 8 5 Leeds . .15 8 7 Lincoln . . 7 3 4 Liverpool . .18 4 14 London . .46 23 23 Manchester . .23 16 7 N e wcastle - on-T. 10 2 8 Northampton .. h" . / 3 4 Norwich . .11 5 6 Nottingham . .12 3 9 Oxford . . 3 2 1 Peterborough .. . 3 1 2 Sheffield . .13 8 5 Shrew’s bury . . 4 2 2 Southampton . . . 5 2 3 Truro . . 1 1 0 Worcester . . 1 1 0 York . . 6 3 ’ 3 EXAMINATIONS IN EDINBURGH. July 13, 14 and 15, 1880. Present — Messrs. Ainslie, Borland, Cilmour, Kemp, Kinninmont, Stephenson and Young. MAJOR EXAMINATION. 13 th.—Two candidates were examined. One failed. The undermentioned passed, and w-as declared qualified to be registered as a Pharmaceutical Chemist : — - Hardie, James Miller . . Dundee. MINOR EXAMINATION. 13£/i. — Nine candidates were examined. Five failed. The following four passed, and were declared qualified to be registered as Chemists and Druggists : — Dick, James Miller . Edinburgh. Dyer, Charles Frederick . High Wycombe. Eunson, John . . Kirkwall. Sanderson, William John . Edinburgh. lith. — Nine candidates were examined. Three failed. The following six passed, and wrere declared qualified to be registered as Chemists and Druggists : — Farquhar, Robert Forbes . Aberdeen. Fleming, Ebenezer . Castle Douglas. Grant, Alexander . Cullen. Hughes, John Smith . Spalding. Kerr, William . Edinburgh. Kinross, William Malloch . Edinburgh. 15 th. — Ten candidates were examined. Four failed July 24, 1SS0.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 65 The following six passed, and were declared qualified to be registered as Chemists and Druggists : — Bowman, George Fell . London. McNiven, James . Edinburgh. Nettleship, Thomas William ...Bawtry. Ray, William Frederic . Westerham. Walker, Thomas Farmery .......York. Westwater, George . Lochgelly. MODIFIED EXAMINATION. 15t7i. — Two candidates were examined. One failed. The undermentioned passed, and was declared qualified to be registered as a Chemist and Druggist : — McLaren, David . Edinburgh. PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION. The Certificate of the University of Glasgow in favour of the undermentioned was received in lieu of the Society’s examination : — Martyn, James . Airdrie. Harliamentarg imb ^ato ^Irombiiigs, The Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v. The London and Provincial Supply Association. This case was opened in the House of Lords on Tuesday July 20, 1880, before the Lord Chancellor, Lord Black¬ burn and Lord Watson. The counsel for the Appellants were Sir John HolkeT, Q.C., Mr. Benjamin, Q.C., and Mr. Lumley Smith, Q.C., instructed by Messrs. Flux, Slade and Co., Solicitors to the Pharmaceutical Society. The counsel for the Respon¬ dents were Mr. Wills, Q.C., and Mr. Finlay. Mr. Benjamin : My lords, this case was argued both in the Divisional Court and in the Court of Appeal, by Sir John Holker, who leads me in the case, and I hope and have reason to believe he will be able to appear before I finish the opening. He is in an important case in Manchester, and I hope he is on his way now, but he has not arrived, and, therefore, it becomes necessary for me to take his place in opening the case. My lords, the amount in dispute in this case is £5, but the question is whether the Act of Parliament, providing protection for Her Majesty’s subjects with regard to the sale of poisons is to become a dead letter, as it would be made according to our contention by the decision appealed from, given by Her Majesty’s Court of Appeal, or whether it should be treated as an Act protecting the lives of the subjects, as determined by the Court of Queen’s Bench. The shortest mode for me to bring your lordships’ attention to the facts of the case will be by referring to the special case, which you will find at page 10 of the Appendix, which was stated by the judge of the county court, the late lamented Mr. Lake Russell: — “ This action was brought in the Bloomsbury County Court to recover a penalty under section 15 of an Act of 81 and 32 Vic. c. 121, intituled ‘The Pharmacy Act, 1868.’ The plaintiffs are a corporation duly incor¬ porated in the year 1843 by Royal Charter (which was confirmed by the Pharmacy Act, 15 and 16 Vic. c. 56), and entitled under section 12 of the said Pharmacy Act, 15 and 16 Vic. c. 56, to sue for penalties in the county court. The defendants are a company registered under the Companies Acts, 1862 and 1867, as a limited com¬ pany, with a nominal capital of £10,000 divided into 1000 shares of £10 each, of which one William Mackness holds 564 shares fully paid up. Six persons (one of whom was Henry Edward Longmore) hold five shares each, with £2 10s. paid on each share. Three persons hold one share each with £2 10s. paid on each share, and the remaining shares are unallotted. The register of the shareholders was put in evidence, and a copy of it may be referred to as part of this case. The said company was registered on the 29th January, 1878, and was formed, inter alia , 1 To purchase or acquire the trade or business of a wholesale and retail grocer and general warehouseman, then carried on by Mr. William Mack¬ ness at No. 113, Tottenham Court Road, Middlesex.’ A copy of the memorandum and articles of association of the company was put in evidence, and may be referred to as part of this case. The said William Mackness is the managing director of the said company. He is not a duly registered pharmaceutical chemist or chemist and druggist within the meaning of the said Pharmacy Act, 1868. Henry Edward Longmore is the only shareholder who is a ‘pharmaceutical chemist’ or ‘chemist and drug¬ gist,’ within the meaning of the Pharmacy Act, 1868. The business of the said company is carried on at 113, Tottenham Court Road aforesaid, and includes, amongst other departments for the sale of various goods, a chemist and druggist’s shop or drug department, which is an open shop for the retailing, dispensing and compounding poisons within the meaning of the Pharmacy Act, 1863. The said poisons are sold to the public, and not merely to members of the defendant company. The said Henry Edward Longmore is, and at the time of the sales of poisons hereinafter mentioned was, a duly registered chemist and druggist within the Pharmacy Act, 1868, and the business of the said drug department was at the several times aforesaid and is conducted by the said Henry Edward Longmore, with the aid of two qualified assistants. The said Henry Edward Longmore (with the aid aforesaid) at the times aforesaid attended and still attends regularly to the said drug department, and to nothing else, and he and his assistants were and are the servants of the defendants, the company, and paid by salary or wages. On the 4th of February, 1878, the said Henry Edward Longmore, acting on behalf of the de¬ fendants, sold at the said premises two pennyworth of oxalic acid. On the 19th of March, 1878, the said Henry Edward Longmore, acting on behalf of the defendants, sold at the said premises solution of perchloride of mer¬ cury, as an ingredient in a prescription then made up by him. On the 20th of March, 1878, the said Henry Edward Longmore, acting on behalf of the defendants, sold at the said premises a pennyworth of white precipitate. All the articles mentioned in paragraphs 8, 9, 10 and 11 inclusive, are poisons, within the meaning of section 15 of the Pharmacy Act, 1868.” Then follow the judge’s notes ; but I do not think it desirable to read them ; if my friends think it necessary they can read them. The findings of the county court judge are quite sufficient to raise the point on which your lordships’ judgment is solicited. Paragraph 14, page 16, of the case proceeds : — “ On the part of the defendants it was contended, first, that as the business of their drug department w’as conducted by the said H. E. Longmore, who was a duly registered chemist and drug¬ gist, the defendants had not incurred any penalty under the said section. Second, that even if it were otherwise the defendants, as an incorporated company, are not within the said Pharmacy Act, 1868.” It is this second contention, which has been maintained by the Appeal Court, which, as we say, practically destroys the entire value of the Act for protecting the subject against the sale of poisons. “ It was on behalf of the plaintiffs con¬ tended, first, that as the defendants kept an open shop for the retailing, dispensing and compounding of poisons, and as the said H. E. Longmore did not keep the said shop, and did not sell poisons therein on his own account, but as the servant and on account of the defendants, the defendants had incurred the penalties mentioned in the said section ; and, secondly, that an incorporated company is within the Pharmacy Act, 1868. I decided that ac¬ cording to the true construction of the Pharmacy Act, 1868, and upon the facts of this case, no offence within the Act was committed by or on the part of defendants, the company, and that the defendants, the company, had not incurred, and were not liable to any penalty under the Act.” Lord Watson : It does not appear there very clearly what view he took of the subject. 66 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [July 24, 18S0 Mr. Benjamin: His judgment is here, my lord, but I hardly think it necessary to read it, because I understand my learned friends on the other side do not rely on it. His view of what was done was not a contravention of the statute, but I believe that point will not be main¬ tained. The second point on which my friend relies is that the Act does not include an incorporate company, and that therefore any incorporated company may sell poisons as they please without reference to the terms of the Act. Lord Blackburn : The corporation are not liable to a penalty; but as they cannot sell poisons without em¬ ploying qualified persons, I do not think it would destroy the Act so thoroughly. I do not think the decision destroys the Act so thoroughly as you say. Mr. Benjamin : Of course, that point will come later. I think it does, that it is an absolute destruction of the Act; because there is nothing to prevent the incorpo¬ rated company from having little boys to sell their drugs, and it would be perfectly impossible to sue the little boys for the penalties, or to attempt to check the sale by seeking for penalties against lads in a shop who sell one pennyworth of oxalic acid to a customer. The Lord Chancellor: As I understand, the learned judge who stated this case proceeded on the ground that Longmore being a duly registered chemist and druggist, the defendants had not incurred any penalty under the statute. Mr. Benjamin : Quite so, my lord, but that over¬ looked one clause in the Act, and I think my learned friend Mr. Wills will not contend that the learned judge’s view was right ; because the A ct punishes not only the sale of the poisons, but it punishes the keeping of a shop open for the sale of poisons to the public, which it is ex¬ pressly found in this case that the defendants did. The Lord Chancellor : But, as I understand — I do not know whether I am right or not — I thought they would have been liable, but for the fact that Longmore was a duly registered chemist and druggist. Mr. Benjamin : Longmore was the one that sold, and it might be possible to contend that it only applied to him, but they overlooked the clause in the Act which makes it penal to keep open shop, and Longmore did not keep open shop ; he was a servant there. The Lord Chancellor: Is the Act printed here, or the material clauses of it, or will you give me a reference to it, and I will send for it? Mr. Benjamin : My lord, we have here some smaller volumes, which will be convenient to your lordships. All the Acts are there, my lord. It is necessary to call your lordships’ attention first to the Act of 1852. It is the 15 and 16 Yict. cap. 56. Now, my lords, that is an Act for regulatingthe qualification of pharmaceutical chemists; “Whereas it is expedient for the safety of the public that persons exercising the business or calling of pharmaceuti¬ cal chemists in Great Britain should possess a competent practical knowledge of pharmaceutical and general che¬ mistry.” Then it goes on and organizes the Society, and about half way down the preamble it says this, “and whereas it is expedient to prevent ignorant and incompe¬ tent persons from assuming the title of or pretending to be pharmaceutical chemists or pharmaceutists in Great Britain, or members of the said Pharmaceutical Society, and to that end it is desirable that all persons before as¬ suming such title should be duly examined as to their skill and knowledge by competent persons and that a register should be kept,” and so forth. Then it is enacted, first, that the charter granted to this Society is confirmed save as altered. Then the Council are authorized to make bye-laws. Then by Section 8 they are empowered to conduct examinations of persons who present themselves for examination under the provisions of this Act, in their knowledge of the Latin language, botany, materia medica and in pharmaceutical and general chemistry, and such other subjects as may from time to time be determined. Then the examiners are to be appointed. Then Section 12 says : “From and after the passing of this Act, it shall not be lawful for any person not being duly registered as a pharmaceutical chemist according to the provisions of this Act to assume or use the title of pharmaceutical chemist or pharmaceutist in any part of Great Britain, or to assume, use, or exhibit any name, title, or sign imply¬ ing that he is registered under this Act, or that he is a member of the said Society, and if any person not being duly registered under, this Act shall assume or use the title of pharmaceutical chemist or pharmaceutist, or shall use, assume, or exhibit any name, title, or sign implying that he is a person registered under this Act, or that he is a member of the said Society, every such person shall be liable to a penalty of £5, and such penalty may be re¬ covered by the Registrar to be appointed under this Act in the name and by the authority of the said Society in manner following, that is to say : In England or Wales, by plaint under the provisions of any Act in force for the more easy recovery of small debts and demands.” Now, my lords, in the years 1867 and 1868 a great deal of excitement arose from the effect of the sale of poisons with fatal consequences in shops of persons incompetent, and Parliament passed an Act, the purpose of which is stated in most emphatic words in the very first words of the pream¬ ble. It is an Act to regulate the sale of poisons and to alter and amend the Pharmacy Act, 1852. “ Whereas it is ex¬ pedient for the safety of the public that persons keeping open shop for the retailing, dispensing or compounding of poisons, and persons known as chemists and druggists, should possess a competent practical knowledge of their business and to that end and from and after the day herein named all persons not already engaged in such business should before commencing such business be duly examined as to their practical knowledge, and that a register should be kept as herein provided, and also that the Act passed in the 15th and 16th years of the reign of Her present Majesty, intituled an Act for regulating the qualification of pharmaceutical chemists, hereinafter described as the Pharmacy Act, should be amended.” Now, the first section is this : “ From and after the 31st day of December, 1868, it shall be unlawful for any person to sell or keep open shop for retailing, dispensing or com¬ pounding poisons, or to assume or use the title ‘ chemist and druggist,’ or chemist or druggist, or pharmaceutical or dispensing chemist or druggist, in any part of Great Britain, unless such person shall be a pharmaceutical chemist or a chemist and druggist within the meaning of this Act and be registered under this Act and conform to such regulations as to the keeping, dispensing and selling of such poisons as may from time to time be prescribed by the Pharmaceutical Society with the consent of the Privy Council.” The Privy Council is made a party to this Act in a number of sections for the protection of the public. The Lord Chancellor : Is there any clause in the Act providing for companies in one way or the other ? Mr. Benjamin: No, my lord, not in one way or the other. The Lord Chancellor : Your argument is that no company can be a qualified person, and on the other hand they say that no company dealing in poisons is within the Act. Is not that so ? Mr. Benjamin : Yes, my lord. Lord Blackburn : Before this Act there were com¬ panies of apothecaries. There was the Apothecaries’ Company of Liverpool, who were a corporation, and the Apothecaries’ Company of London. Was it intended to say that they should no longer sell drugs and medicines ? The Lord Chancellor : The Society of Apothecaries in London is incorporated. Mr. Benjamin : I am going to call attention to these societies. For them there is a special Act, and I shall have to call your attention specifically to those Acts. There is no prohibition against any of these companies selling drugs and medicines. They may sell drugs and medicines. The Lord Chancellor : Providing there is no ingredient of a poisonous character in them. Are there any medicines of which you can say that ? July 24, 1880.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 67 Mr. Benjamin : Yes, my lord ; castor oil is not a poison. A list of poisons is given, and everything else is exempt. Lord Blackburn : You say they may sell drugs and medicines, but they shall not sell them if they contain any of these drugs which have some poisons in them. If it is so, they will never be able to dispense their prescriptions. Mr. Benjamin : I do not know, my lord, whether they would or not ; but whether they would or not, the question is whether they are prohibited by this Act from selling poisons. What we contend is that there is absolutely nothing to prevent their going on with the ordinary business in drugs, only when any prescription is called for containing poison, they must say you must go to a pharmaceutical chemist. Lord Watson : The schedule mentions a great many. The Lord Chancellor: “Emetric tartar, opium, chloro¬ form.” Mr. Benjamin: Yes, my lord, “corrosive sublimate, cantharides, cyanide of potassium, strychnine, arsenic and prussic acid.” You must not deal in these things. Nobody is to deal in these things but a man who has been properly educated. Lord Blackburn : Then unless there be some special legislation, the Society of Apothecaries or any other corporation would have that part of their trade taken away from them. Mr. Benjamin : Your lordship, I think, is quite mis¬ taken in assuming that. The Society of Apothecaries is composed exclusively of persons who have undergone this examination. Lord Blackburn : They have undergone an examina¬ tion, but the corporation has not. The person who occupies the open shop has not undergone the examination. Mr. Benjamin : That is quite true ; but the persons who keep the open shop, that is the corporation, is composed of persons exclusively who can. To go into that would take me away from following this Act, which is really the Act which is submitted for your lordships’ interpretation. I have just read the 1st section. Then the 2nd section provides for a schedule of what are poisons within the meaning of the Act. Then the 3rd section says : “ Chemists and druggists within the meaning of this Act shall consist of all persons who at any time before the passing of this Act have carried on, in Great Britain, the business of a chemist and druggist, in keeping of open shop for the compounding of the prescriptions of duly qualified medical practitioners, also of all assistants and associates who, before the passing of this Act shall have been duly registered under or according to the provisions of the Pharmacy Act, and also of all such persons as may be duly registered under this Act.” You seethe words “ all persons.” If persons mean corpora¬ tions, as we say it does, a number of societies your lord- ship has spoken of are saved by the Act itself. The Lord Chancellor : Because they kept a shop before ? Mr. Benjamin: Yes, my lord. Lord Blackburn : I do not quite see that. Mr. Benjamin : Chemists and druggists within the meaning of this Act shall mean persons. If “ persons ” means corporations, it means those carrying on business before the Act. Lord Blackburn : No ; the obvious meaning is the person who has been acting as a chemist shall without further examination be deemed to be qualified. But now people must go through a new examination. It never means anything so extremely eccentric as to say that a corporation such as the Pharmaceutical Society may be deemed a qualified chemist and druggist. Lord Watson : It seems to include the several persons who are duly qualified under the Act of 1852. The Lord Chancellor : I do not know. The preamble begins by saying that from the day named all persons not already engaged in business shall be examined, and so on. Then the first section says that nobody shall sell these things unless he, inter alia, is a chemist and druggist within the meaning of the Act. If that clause extends to corporations in existence before, I do not quite see why the persons in the 3rd section, where it says persons who at any time before the passing of this Act have carried on business as chemists and druggists, and so on, shall be chemists and druggists within the Act. Therefore it is not unlawful for them to sell poisons under the 1st section. Mr. Benjamin : Those are merely collateral points, my lord, because the real question is whether it is now lawful for any company whatever, including all these supply associations, to have an establishment for the sale of poisons. The Lord Chancellor: The sale to be effected by persons really qualified, selling by that person’s agency. That seems to be the view in the respondents’ case. Mr Benjamin: That is the view* in the respondents’ case. What we contend is, that the Act does not apply to corporations, and therefore if it does not apply to cor¬ porations at all they could not have qualified persons. Lord Blackburn : If they do not have qualified persons could you not proceed against the director who employed an unqualified person to sell ? Mr. Benjamin : I am not concerned to inquire whether the directors are liable. I dare say they are. But our contention is that a corporation keeps an open shop for the sale of poisons. Lord Blackburn : I quite understand it. I quite follow it. I was only a little hesitating as to your state¬ ment, which seemed rather calculated to frighten the House, that the Act would be a dead letter. Mr. Benjamin: It occurs to me that it would, my lord. Lord Watson: You say that the offence of selling and the offence of keeping open shop are two distinct offences. Mr. Benjamin : Quite so, my lord ; they are quite distinct offences. It is most important to keep them separate, because I think there must be some ambiguity in relation to the person who is liable for selling, although it may possibly be contended that the individual who sold, and not the master for whom he sold, was the person selling. There can be no doubt or hesitation upon the question as to who it is who keeps the open shop. The servant does not keep the open shcp. It is the master that keeps the open shop. Lord Blackburn : Surely there is no ambiguity. The one selling is the master. Mr. Benjamin : I am quite willing to accept that, although there is something in the 17th section which would seem to make that a little doubtful. You will find in the 17th section this statement: “It shall be unlawful to sell any poison either by wholesale or retail, unless the box, bottle, vessel, wrapper or cover in which such poison is contained be distinctly labelled with the name of the article and the word ‘ poison,’ and with the name and address of the seller.” And a little further down : “ And for the purposes of this section the person on whose behalf any sale is made by any apprentice or servant shall be deemed to be the seller ; but the provi¬ sions of this section, which are solely applicable to poisons in the first part of the schedule (A) to this Act, or which require that the label shall contain the name and address of the seller, shall not apply to articles to be exported.” It has been argued, and your lordship will see that one of the arguments in the case is, that inasmuch as in the 17th section it is specially provided that for the purpose of that section the person on whose behalf the sale is made is to be deemed the seller, that therefore in the other sections of the Act — that is the argument — the seller means the servant who sells, not the master on whose behalf he sells. I do not think the argument is a good one, but I call attention to it as a reason why I speak of our contention. Our contention is this. Our contention is that keeping open shop for the sale of 68 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [July 24, 1SS0. poison to the public, which is what has been done by the finding of this case by this company, is an offence. Have they a right to do that ? because if they are not under the Act they can do it without a qualified person. There¬ fore, in that sense we say the whole protection of Her Majesty’s subjects is gone, if the whole of the co-opera¬ tive societies of all sorts which are springing up, as well as anybody who chooses, like this gentleman, who wras a grocer, and chose to take in five or six persons with a small qualification, and convert himself into a limited company — anybody, under the decision as it stands, as we contend, could open a shop, and is not bound by the Act ; therefore, all the precautions against the sale of poi¬ sons provided by the Act of Parliament become nugatory. Then, my lords, there is another section which provides that the Society may sue in the same way as the former Act provided. That being the condition of the legislation, I call your lordships’ attention to the judgment of the county court judge. He made one or two mistakes in his judgment which he corrected afterwards in his state¬ ment of the case. The statement of the case, therefore, gives the facts; but the judgment of the learned judge is this : “ Now the question is, whether a company of this sort, in which a shareholder is not a registered chemist and druggist, is at liberty to sell poisons without committing an offence under the Act of Parliament and incurring the penalty imposed by it.” He then recites section 1 and sections 15 and 16: “In addition to that, my attention was also called to an earlier Act for the construction of statutes, in which it says that in certain cases the word ‘ person ’ shall include a corporate body. Upon that it was contended that this corporate body, in¬ cluding persons who are not duly qualified chemists and druggists, could not carry on such business without incurring the penalties imposed by the Act. Now, the first thing that strikes one is, that if Mr. Longmore had sold these things for himself alone he would not have committed any offence whatever.” That is true. “ He is a duly qualified man, and if he had kept an open shop and sold poisons he was duly qualified to do that, and it would be no offence whatever. However, it is said that it was committing an offence, because the business was so conducted that money is acquired, and the profit so made goes into the pockets of other people. That ob¬ viously is not within the mischief intended to be remedied by the Act. I have carefully considered it, and have availed myself of the very able argument of Mr. Plux on the part of the plaintiffs, but the result I have come to is that it is not an offence within the Act when done in the manner this has been done.” He has entirely overlooked section 1 which makes it an offence to keep an open shop. “ It does not become unlawful when done on behalf of the company, so long as the business is con¬ ducted by a duly qualified chemist and druggist, who, if carrying it on for his own benefit, would not be within the penalties of the Act. It is not within the mischief intended to be prevented, and I am of opinion that no offence within the Act, therefore, was committed.” Therefore, my lords, he does not determine the second question, whether the Act applies to a corporation. He says what has been done has been done by a qualified man, overlooking the fact, that a qualified man although he sold did not keep open shop, and therefore keeping open shop was the offence for which the penalty was sought to be recovered. Your lordships will find the plaint with the particulars at page 5. The plaint is this: “ Between the Council of the Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, by Elias Bremridge, the Registrar of the Society, by the authority of the Council, and the London and Provincial Supply Association, Limited. The follow¬ ing are the particulars of the plaintiffs’ demand herein : To amount of penalty incurred by the defendants in selling or keeping an open shop for the retailing, dis¬ pensing or compounding poisons.” The Lord Chancellor : I do not know whether any technical rule applies to the construction of these plaints, but you will observe that the offence of selling is not alleged nor keeping open shop. It is selling, or keeping open shop. Mr. Benjamin : It is using the language of the section. The Lord Chancellor : There seems to be no averment on the face of the plaint that he did either one thing or the other. Mr. Benjamin: It goes on, “to wit, red oxide of mercury.” The Lord Chancellor : There is no averment there. The plaint is — I do not know whether there is anything in it — but there is no statement that they are sued because they sold or a statement that they are sued because they kept an open shop, but it is for a penalty iucurred in “selling or keeping an open shop.” Mr. Benjamin: Keeping open shop for the sale of. Tbe Lord Chancellor: The “ or ” is disjunctive, which makes it uncertain what they are charged with. Mr. Benjamin : That is not one of the points which is submitted by the case. The case only submits two questions to the Court. Lord Watson: They are not alternative, they are really a cumulative charge. Lord Blackburn : The distinction between the act of selling which was done by a qualified servant and the act of keeping open shop does not seem to have occurred until after the county court judge had given his decision. Mr. Benjamin : He says the two points were argued before him. He puts the question for the decision of the Court at page 17. The Lord Chancellor: I should almost doubt. I do not know whether the question of keeping open the shop as distinct from selling was argued before him. At page 7 he says. “ The question is whether a company of this sort in which a shareholder is not a registered chemist and druggist is at liberty to sell poisons.” Mr. Benjamin : At page 17, he says distinctly the point was before him, and he submits it to the Court — “The questions for the decision of the Court are: 1st. Whether or not a registered company comprising share¬ holders who are not duly registered pharmaceutical chemists or chemists and druggists keeping an open shop for the retailing, dispensing or compounding poisons — ” The Lord Chancellor : Is there no doubt ? Mr. Benjamin : “ — and employing therein a duly re¬ gistered pharmaceutical chemist or chemist and druggist, to conduct the business, is liable to a penalty under the 15th section of the Pharmacy Act, 1868. And 2nd. Whether an incorporated company is within the Phar¬ macy Act, 1868. Those are the two questions. Judg¬ ment is to be entered for the plaintiffs for £5, with costs, or for the defendants, with costs, according as the Court may answer these questions.” Then there is the memorandum and articles of association, but I do not think anything turns on them beyond merely to point this out, that under the decision, if a company is not under the Act, then anybody can by the help of five or six servants or friends taking a share apiece keep open a shop for the sale of poisons, he himself not being qualified. Lord Blackburn : Would there be any very great harm in that if he took care to have a qualified person to serve ? Mr. Benjamin : But if the Act does not apply to him he need not have a qualified man. Lord Blackburn : If he had not a qualified manager I should apprehend hp would be clearly liable to a penalty for selling. Mr. Benjamin : My lord, if it is a company and that is not within the Act, how are they liable ? Lord Blackburn : The directors. Mr. Benjamin: I am not speaking of the directors but of the company. It is the company that keep open shop. If it does, the question is whether the Act reaches a company. It has been held by the Court of Appeal that the Act does not reach a company. If that be the case, anybody who wants to sell may form just such an July 24^1680.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 69 association as this man did with six or seven friends with a share apiece. Lord Blackburn : What struck me was this, it is very probable they will not incur a penalty as a corporation, but I see no reason why every one of the unqualified men should not be liable to a penalty and therefore the Act would prevent them just as before. It would be only different in form. Mr. ~Pp.nja.min : It is possible when we came to sue a director he would say, I keep no open shop. Lord Blackburn: But though he would not sell he might have kept an open shop. If this Mr. Mackness were not to employ a qualified person but an unqualified person to sell and you brought an action against him to recover a penalty for that he caused an unqualified person to sell, I do not see, at present, why you should not succeed. Mr. Benjamin : Some of the judges think he would not be liable. Lord Watson: I understand Mr. Benjamin’s contention to be that no person or aggregate of persons can keep a shop although they conduct the business that is carried on in that shop by mean of a registered person. Lord Blackburn : That is the contention. Mr. Benjamin: Yes, my lord. Now, my lords, here is the judgment of the Divisional Court. The Lord Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Mellor were both of opinion that this penalty had been incurred, and was properly sued for. [The Court adjourned for a short time.] Mr. Benjamin : My lords, I was about to read the judgment of the Court of Queen’s Bench. I need not read the first part, which is simply a re-statement of the facts which I have put before your lordships. The Lord Chief Justice says “Upon this state of facts the question presents itself whether the defendant company as such is amenable to the penal enactments of the statute. It was fully admitted on the argument, nor could it be contested, that, if this had been an ordinary partnership, the individual partners, at all events such of them as were not qualified under the statute, would have incurred the penalties it imposes. The intention of the Legislature appears clearly to have been to prevent any shop or establishment to exist for the sale of poisons, except under the immediate superintendence and control of a duly qualified proprietor. It is not enough that the proprietor employs a qualified person to manage the busi¬ ness. The master must himself be duly qualified. Two parties could not combine to carry on the joint business of grocer and chemist, though the one attending to the latter department of the business might be a qualified chemist. There would be nothing to insure in such a case that, in the absence of the qualified partner, the other might not take upon himself to act in his stead, and thus the security against fatal mistakes in the dispensation of medicines which the statute was intended to insure might be seriously compromised. The defendants are, therefore, within the scope of this legislation ; the case comes within the evil against which the statute was intended to provide a remedy. But they are said not to be within the statute as being an incorporated company ; the main ground on which this contention rests being that the Act in ques¬ tion, in its prohibitory as well as penal clauses, uses the term ‘ person,’ a term which, it is contended, cannot be properly applied to a corporate body. The objection thus founded on the use of the word ‘person’ in the penal clauses of the Act would seem at first sight to present some difficulty, but when the scope and purpose of this legisla¬ tion are taken into account the difficulty does not appear to be insuperable. Reliance was placed by the Attorney- General, in his argument in support of the appeal, on the enactment of the 14th section of the 7 and 8 Geo. IV., c. 28, that whenever any statute relating to any offence, whether punishable by indictment or summary conviction, in describing the offence or the offender, uses words im¬ porting the singular number or the masculine gender only, it shall be understood to include several matters as well as one matter, several persons as well as one person, males as well as females and bodies corporate as well as indi¬ viduals, unless it be otherwise specially provided, or there be something in the subject or context repugnant to such construction. But that Act is expressly confined to pro¬ ceedings on indictment or summary conviction, and, therefore, cannot apply here, where the proceeding is by civil action. It shows, no doubt, the disposition of the Legislature to include corporations under the general designation of person or individual in penal statutes, but the terms of the Act will not admit of its application to the present case. To solve the question, we must therefore confine our attention to the statute itself, on which this action is brought.” The Lord Chancellor : You have said nothing on this subject of the General Act for the Interpretation of Statutes. Mr. Benjamin : That is Lord Brougham’s Act. The Lord Chancellor : Yes. Mr. Benjamin : Lord Brougham’s Act has nothing on this particular point. I will call your lordships’ atten¬ tion to what that has presently. “ That an incorporated company is within the mischief against which this legis¬ lation was directed is, I cannot help thinking, quite obvious. If a company, by reason of its being incor¬ porated, is not within the provisions of the Act and amenable to its penalties, and effect is to be given to the argument of Mr. Wills, it necessarily follows that such a company might openly carry on the business of chemists and druggists and sell poisons without a single member of the company, or even the person employed to conduct this portion of their business, being qualified. The person actually selling the poisons might be amenable, and it was probably with a view to avoid this that, in the present instance, a qualified person was employed to manage this department of the defendants’ business ; but the company employing him would enjoy complete immunity. A person desiring to combine the business of a chemist and druggist with that of a grocer would have only to get one or two persons to join him, providing them with a share or two, as appears to have been done in the formation of this company, and so forming an in¬ corporated company, to set the statute at defiance. It cannot be supposed that the Legislature can have con¬ templated a result so entirely at variance with the policy and purpose of the Act.” Lord Blackburn : Was the purpose of the Act to secure the monopoly of all dealings and transactions in these things to apothecaries, or to secure that there should be skilled persons concerned in the sale of drugs ? because they are two very opposite purposes. Mr. Benjamin : My lord, I protest very submissively against the use of the word “ drugs.” The Act speaks of poisons. Lord Blackburn : Poisons, if you prefer it. Lord Watson: Poisonous drugs. Mr. Benjamin : Yes, my lord. Lord Blackburn : The greater portion of the reasoning of the Lord Chief Justice goes to this, that inasmuch as in order to secure that qualified persons shall attend to these matters, the Legislature thought fit to say, perhaps from intention or perhaps by oversight, that no one shall keep open shop except a qualified person ; it, therefore, follows that the object of the Act was to prevent any¬ one carrying on that business. The Legislature has accidentally said probably, that if a man dies, leaving the goodwill of his business to his wife, that she shall not carry it on, which is rather hard, but that is an accident from what they were intending. The Lord Chief Justice reasons as if the principal object of the Act was to give a monopoly to the qualified chemist. Mr. Benjamin: That is the odium or prejudice at¬ tempted to be cast against this prosecution no doubt. We submit it is not even matter of prejudice, that the prosecution has nothing to do with the general business of a druggist, that there are a thousand things which a 70 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [July 24, 1880. druggist may sell, but it is only certain poisons which the Legislature deemed dangerous to the public, and the sale of which, or probably even keeping open a shop for the sale of which it has laid down certain precautions. The one question is whether in that Act, which is plain enough in its words, the word “ person ” includes cor¬ porations. I apprehend, my lords, that no one will doubt that if I were to hire a shop in Oxford Street and keep a qualified person there to sell poisonous drugs, coming with the purview of this Act I should be liable. Lord Blackburn: You would be brought within the letter of the Act. Mr. Benjamin : I should be within the Act. Lord Blackburn: Whether you would be brought within the spirit of it, so that the words should be stretched to include the case of a body corporate when carrying on such a business, which is what the Lord Chief Justice seemed to think, is not, to my'mind, quite so clear. Mr. Benjamin : I will come back to that presently ; I do not think it will require any stretching. I shall give well-established decisions that the word “person” must mean corporations. The Lord Chancellor: There is only one difficulty which has occurred to me, Mr. Benjamin, and I shall be glad if you will meet it ; that is this: the 1st section says it shall be unlawful to do these things unless such person shall be a pharmaceutical chemist or chemist and drug¬ gist within the meaning of this Act, and registered as such. I suppose that a corporation cannot be a pharma¬ ceutical chemist or a chemist and druggist within the meaning of this Act, unless you would say that the 3rd section might include corporations which before the Act were carrying on business as chemists and druggists. Mr. Benjamin: My lord, I have not yet called your attention to the 15th section: “From and after the 31st day of December, 1868, any person who shall sell or keep open shop for the retailing, dispensing, or compounding poisons, or who shall take, use, or exhibit the name or title of chemist and druggist, or chemist or druggist, not being a duly registered pharmaceutical chemist or chemist and druggist” (leaving out other things), “shall for every such offence be liable to pay a penalty or sum of £5.” The Lord Chancellor : That so far would be equal to the same thing. What has been passing through my mind is this, and I will put it in the form of a question. Can the word “person” in this clause include the word “corporation,” if it is impossible for the corporation to do the thing which the clauses seem to assume that the person may, if he pleases, do % Mr. Benjamin : Yes, my lord, that is another part of my argument. That is the question before your lord- ships. We say that the true meaning of the clauses is, no shops shall be kept open for the sale of poisons to the public except by a person duly registered as a pharmaceu¬ tical chemist or chemist and druggist. The Lord Chancellor : In other words, it shall be im¬ possible for any joint stock company to deal with these things. Mr. Benjamin : It is to be impossible for anybody but a pharmaceutical chemist or chemist and druggist. The Lord Chancellor: As a joint stock company can¬ not be, although anybody in the world may be, a phar¬ maceutical chemist, there is, whether intended or not, an exclusion of all joint stock companies from this business. Mr. Benjamin : Yes, my lord, as there is an exclusion of every other subject of Her Majesty except that one. Lord Watson: The other subjects of Her Majesty can qualify ; a corporation cannot. The Lord Chancellor: A partnership might be formed, we will suppose, exclusively of pharmaceutical chemists, yet, according to your argument, it would be equally impossible for it to carry on this business. Mr. Benjamin : A partnership ? The Lord Chancellor: Yes; assume it a part of the memorandum or articles of association that no one should hold shares who was not qualified. Mr. Benjamin : Your lordship is speaking of a company. I was thinking of a partnership. The Lord Chancellor : A company, that no one should hold shares who was not qualified under this Act, and, as a matter of fact, every shareholder might be so qualified, and yet your argument still is that such a corporation is excluded from carrying on business. Mr. Benjamin: I say the Act means this, and nothing else : no one shall keep an open shop for the sale of poisons except a registered pharmaceutical chemist — that that is the whole meaning of the Act. The Lord Chancellor: You may be quite right. Mr. Benjamin : I think when you come to compare the provisions of the Act your lordship will come to that conclusion ; at least, I hope so. At all events, there are two eminent judges who came to that conclusion, although other eminent judges have come to the contrary. I will now go on with the judgment of the Lord Chief Justice : “ A person desiring to combine the business of a chemist and druggist with that of a grocer would have only to get one or two persons to join him, providing them with a share or two, as appears to have been done in the formation of this company, and so forming an incor¬ porated company, to set the statute at defiance. It cannot be supposed that the Legislature can have contemplated a result so entirely at variance with the policy and purpose of the Act, or intended to place incorporated companies on a different footing in this respect from that of ordinary partnerships or individuals. It is, no doubt, possible that, although joint stock com¬ panies existed at the time this statute was passed, the formation of such companies for the purpose of combining trades hitherto carried on singly, and among other things for that of superadding the business of the chemist to that of the grocer or provision merchant, may not have been present to the minds of those who framed and passed this statute. Still, if the case, though unforeseen, is within the mischief which the Legislature had in view, and the enactment is large enough to embrace it without any forced or strained construction being put on the language of the Act, it is our duty to advance the remedy intended to be afforded. It is true that the term used in the 1st section of the Act is ‘persons,’ and that, ordinarily speaking, this word would not be applicable to a corpora¬ tion.” The Lord Chief Justice puts the case lower than I should contend for. I say, ordinarily speaking “person” is applicable to a corporation. “ But when the meaning and effect of the enactment is looked at without too close an adherence to its precise phraseology, it amounts to no less than a general prohibition to everyone not qualified according to the Act from dealing in poisons or carrying on the business of a chemist and druggist.” Lord Watson: He means retail dealing, of course, in using that term. Mr. Benjamin : Yes, my lord; he means what the Act poiuts out, retailing the poisons to the public. “ The fallacy of the argument urged on behalf of the defendants is that it assumes that the prohibition is addressed to individual persons ; but the provision being universal, must extend to all persons, whether acting in an individual or corporate capacity. The defendants, it is true, in thus infringing the law are not acting in their individual capacity, and may not (but on this it is unnecessary to pronounce any opinion) be liable indi¬ vidually. But in their aggregate or corporate capacity they are breaking the law, and being in the latter capacity, as well as individually, within the prohibition they must, if capable of being sued for it, be also amenable to the penalty, and must for this purpose be taken to be sufficiently persons within the meaning of the statute. The fact so strenuously insisted on by Mr. Wills, that, in other sections of the Act, the word ‘ person ’ is applicable to individual persons only, and not to a corporate body, only tends to show that the adoption of the business of chemists and druggists by incorporated companies like the present was not contemplated wh n J*ily 24, 1380.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 71 the Act was passed. It by no means shows that the prohibition being general and the mischief being clearly within the statute, the company, though as such they may be incapable of complying with some of its require¬ ments — as, for instance, to undergo examination under section 6 — ought not to be held to be within the penal clauses of the Act, or should be allowed openly to break the law under the belief that they are beyond its reach. In the present case, it so happens that a member of the oompany, and who manages the chemical department of its business, Mr. Henry Edward Longmore, is a qualified chemist. But it is not as a member of the company that he so acts, but as the paid servant of the company. It is clear, therefore, that his being qualified will not exonerate the other members of the company who are not so. Nor would it be otherwise even if it were as a member of the company that he so acted. So long as any of the company are disqualified, the body is disqualified ; and the one who, though himself qualified, acts for the body becomes a party to their offence, and becomes liable conjointly with them. The qualified chemist who, in partnership with a grocer, carried on the business of grocer and •chemist, would be as liable to the statutory penalty as his unqualified partner.” The learned judge here is speaking of an apothecary who takes a partner. Lord Blackburn : Is there anything in the Act which says that if a qualified person is carrying on business he shall be subject to a penalty for carrying on a business with an open shop because he has an unqualified partner ? It does not seem to me very reasonable, I do not know why it is to be assumed that is intended. Lord Watson : There is no provision for the separation of the trade of selling drugs, or poisons. Mr. Benjamin: No, the prohibition is to the open shop to sell poisons. Lord Blackburn : Exactly so, and it has been worded to the extent that, as far as I can see, if A. dies leaving the goodwill of his business to his widow that destroys it. The widdW cannot carry on the business. Mr. Benjamin : There is a special provision for that. Lord Blackburn : Where is that ? It may throw some light on the point. Mr. Benjamin: In section 16 : “ Nothing hereinbefore ■contained shall extend to or interfere with the business of any legally qualified apothecary or of any member of the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons of Great Britain, nor with the making or dealing in patent medi¬ cines, nor with the business of wholesale dealers in sup¬ plying poisons in the ordinary course of wholesale dealing, and upon the decease of any pharmaceutical chemist or chemist and druggist actually in business at the time of his death, it shall be lawful for any executor, admin¬ istrator- or trustee of the estate of such pharmaceutical chemist or chemist and druggist to continue such busi¬ ness if and so long only as such business shall be bond fide conducted by a duly qualified assistant, and a duly •qualified assistant within the meaning of this clause, shall be a pharmaceutical chemist or a chemist and druggist registered by the registrar under the Pharmacy Act or this Act : Provided always, that registration under this Act shall not entitle any person so registered to practise medicine or surgery, or any branch of medicine or surgery.” That is, on the decease of course the widow would have to sell out the business in the ordinary way, but the business is not to be destroyed. That hardship is provided against. Lord Blackburn : It is provided for in her case that she shall carry it on with a qualified assistant. Mr. Benjamin : That is one of the grounds on which we rest. We contend that this special exception in favour of a widow, who is not qualified, carrying on with a Qualified assistant, is strongly in our favour. The Lord Chancellor : The widow who remains executor or administrator. Mr. Benjamin: “Any executor, administrator, or trustee.” Lord Blackburn: It is to meet the hardship of that particular case. Mr. Benjamin: It is the solitary case provided in the Act in which a person not qualified may carry on the business, and that is only on certain specified terms. It must be bond fide conducted by a duly qualified assistant, and the duly qualified assistant is a pharmaceutical chemist or chemist and druggist registered under the provisions of this Act. The Lord Chancellor : It is not material whether the Lord Chief J ustice was authorized or not in saying that a qualified chemist who, in partnership with a grocer, carried on the business of a grocer and chemist, would be held liable to the statutory penalty. I fail in finding any words in the Act which justify it, but probably it is not very important. Mr. Benjamin : It may perhaps be doubtful, because the industry of my learned friend has picked out an old case, a curious case, the very first case ever decided by Lord Mansfield, in which Reynard sued Chase. It is a case of Reynard v. Chase, reported in first Burrows. In that case it was for infringing the statute for carrying on the business of a brewer. One of the two partners was a brewer and the other was not, but it was expressly found in the case that the business of brewing was cari'ied on by the qualified brewer, who was paid for it by the partnership as a paid servant, and after he had carried on the business of brewing then the profits were divided between the partners. Under the special cir¬ cumstances Lord Mansfield held that the unqualified partner was not liable to be sued. The Lord Chancellor: Not the unqualified partner ? Mr. Benjamin: Because he took no part in the brewing whatever. Lord Blackburn : I was not aware there was any Act with regard to a qualified brewer. Perhaps it turned on the words of the Act. Mr. Benjamin: It did not require a qualified brewer. It was one of the old Acts of the city of London which prohibited anyone carrying on a trade without having gone through a proper apprenticeship. One of the men had gone through an apprenticeship, and become a brewer in that sense, and the Court, consisting of Lord Mansfield and his associates, held that the other partner was really not doing business as a brewer. The Lord Chancellor : As I understand, it was held that in a case in which one of two partners was legally quali¬ fied, the benefit of his qualification enured to the other. Mr. Benjamin : It did not go quite to that extent. I will show your lordship exactly what it was. It was found that the one who was not qualified was not breaking the statute if he took no part in brewing. The Lord Chancellor : It is certain that the corporation takes no part in selling the poison, except in the sense in which the partner would. Mr. Benjamin : I always go back to this, the corpora¬ tion keep the shop open. Lord Watson : In that case the business of brewing was in this sense carried on by the partners, that they drew the profits. It seems to have been held to satisfy the statute that they carried on business exclusively by means of a qualified person to whom they delegated the practical part of the business. Mr. Benjamin : The statute was simply this, it pro¬ hibited any person not having passed his apprenticeship, from pursuing a particular trade. The Lord Chancellor : It is the prohibition of anyone not answering a certain description from pursuing a particular trade. Lord Watson : A retail brewing business. What they have done here is a retail trade in poisons, according to your contention. Mr. Benjamin : Yes, my lord. Lord Watson : You say no man shall carry it on although he delegates the whole conduct of the business to a qualified man. 72 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [July 24, 1880. • Mr. Benjamin : Yes, my lord, that is what the statute says. But here there is no qualified partner. The Lord Chancellor : You may draw a distinction between a partnership and a corporation, no doubt. Lord Blackburn : The Lord Chief J ustice’s indignation is against a man carrying on the trade of a chemist and a grocer in one and the same partnership. I confess I do not myself see it. Mr. Benjamin : The indignation there of the Legisla¬ ture is against the sale of poisons to the public. That is what he was dealing with in the particular case. The illustration may not be as applicable as it might have been otherwise. The Lord Chief Justice goes on: — “ Being thus of opinion that a company, though incor¬ porated, is none the less within the prohibition of the statute, I come to the remaining question, whether such a company is capable of being sued for the penalty provided by the 15th section. Upon this point the authorities referred to by the Attorney- General in his argument appear to me to afford a satisfactory answer. Although it is true that a corporation cannot be indicted for treason or felony, it was established by the case of Reg. v. The Birmingham and Gloucester Railway Company that an incorporated company might be indicted for nonfeasance, in omitting to perform a duty imposed by statute — such as that of making arches to connect lands severed by the defendants’ railway. It was further held, in Reg. v. The Great Northern of England Railway Company, that an incorporated com¬ pany could be indicted for misfeasance — as in cutting through and obstructing a highway — though they could not be indicted for treason or felony or offences against the person. In the present instance we are dealing, not with an indictment or information, but with an action in a civil court. Though the sum to be recovered is no doubt a penalty for the infraction of the statute, the means to be resorted to for its recovei'y are of a purely civil character. If a corporation can be indicted for misfeasance, I am wholly at a loss to see why it may not be proceeded against in a civil suit for the recovery of a penalty which it has incurred by disobedience to a statutory prohibition.” Then, my lord, came the judgment of Mr. Justice Mellor. He says “ I have come, with considerable hesitation, to the conclusion that our judgment should be for the plaintiffs, and that both questions submitted to us must be answered in their favour. I was for some time inclined to think that the circumstances of the de¬ fendants’ case were not within the contemplation of Parliament when the Pharmacy Act, 1868, was passed, and that although clearly within the mischief intended to be provided against, words sufficiently comprehensive had not been used in framing the Act to include the acts of the defendants, and that, consequently, it became a casus omissus. A fuller consideration of the provisions of the Act 31 and 32 Vic., cap. 121, has, however, brought me to the same conclusion as that expressed by my Lord Chief Justice in his judgment in this case. I think that the great object of the Legislature was to prevent the sale of poisonous or dangerous drugs by persons not quali¬ fied by skill or experience to deal in such commodities. It, therefore, proposed to form into one association all persons who for the future should alone be deemed to deal in the same, and who should be registered under the provisions of the Act which we are now considering. It accordingly provided for the interests of all chemists and druggists who had been in business as such previously to the passing of the Act, but with regard to the future it made careful provision for the examination and registra¬ tion of all persons who should in future form the only qualified body of persons who should be permitted to keep open shop for the retailing or compounding of poi¬ sons, and I now think that the sections which mainly embarrassed me as to the extent of the prohibitive sec¬ tions are really, when carefully considered, only the provisions regulating the steps which in future are to be taken by all persons who desire to obtain the privilege of keeping open shop and retailing, dispensing or compounding the poisonous drugs in question, and) who, upon being registered as pharmaceutical chemists,, or chemists and druggists, within the provisions of the Act, will become qualified so to do. To incorporate such a society, to whose members in future the sole privilege of keeping open shop as chemists, or chemists and drug¬ gists, for the sale, or dispensing or compounding poisons should be intrusted, rendered it necessary to prohibit all other persons, not so registered or qualified, from keeping- open shop or retailing, dispensing or compounding such drugs for sale, and from assuming the title of pharma¬ ceutical chemist, or chemist and druggist, and, therefore, whilst one set of sections are qualifying and intended to- regulate for the future the mode in which persons should become qualified as members of the association, and to- provide for the government of the body incorporated, the sections 1 and 15 of the Act which contain the prohibi¬ tory words, upon the meaning of which we have to decide, have an entirely distinct effect. The object of those sections is absolutely to prevent the danger assumed to be likely to arise to the public by the keeping open shop for the retailing, dispensing or compounding poisons, by any persons not being qualified pharmaceutical chemists, or chemists and druggists, and the intention and scope of those sections and the general object of the Act is ab¬ solutely to exclude, from the time of the passing of the- Act, all persons other than the registered members of the- Pharmaceutical Society from keeping open shop or re¬ tailing, dispensing or compounding of poisons. Now, before the passing of the Act, 1868, all persons, whether ‘natural persons’ or ‘artificial persons’ constituted by incorporation for trading purposes, might either as in¬ dividuals or as corporations have kept open shops and retailed, dispensed or compounded poisons. It was es¬ sential, therefore, to the effectuating the objects of the- Act, that all persons, whether natural or artificial, should for the future be prevented from dealing as before in the prohibited matters; and the cases cited by the Attorney- General in his argumeut show that an incorporated com¬ pany may commit an offence either of nonfeasance or misfeasance, and may be punished by indictment for the same as if the act had been done by a natural person. We may well, therefore, interpret the word ‘person’ in the 1st and 15th sections so as to include not only any natural persons, but any artificial person created by tho law, which would be capable of committing the offence referred to in the 15th section, as having committed it by the course of proceeding actually adopted by the de¬ fendants ; and we are authorized upon the principle of decided cases to say not only the ‘ offence ’ has been committed by the defendants, but that they are liable to* be punished for it under the provisions of the 15th section.” Then my friend Mr. Wills asked for leave to appeal, and the Lord Chief Justice says: “I think, looking to the importance of the question involved, you ought to have leave to appeal. I confess I give it to you with reluctance, because no one can doubt for a single moment that if the law is to be established by that Act of Parliament, your company are just as much within the mischief of it as an ordinary partnership; at the same time, the matter is not so free from doubt as that I think you- ought to have leave to appeal.” Now, my lords, on appeal from that came the judgments of the Lords Justices ra¬ the Court of Appeal. Lord Justice Bramwell says t “ I am of opinion that this appeal must be allowed. I think the word ‘ person ’ in section 15 of the Pharmacy Act, 1868, does not include a corporation. That the word ‘ person ’ may include corporation I will not deny, though at the same time, considering the way in which statutes are now drawn, that when ‘ corpo¬ ration ’ is meant it is always named, at least that there is no modern instance to the contrary, and that when the Legislature made a general interpretation clause that ‘ person ’ should be male and female, plural and singular, etc., it did not include ‘corporation,’ X July 24, 1S80] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 73 should be reluctant to hold that in any particular statute ‘ person ’ included ‘ corporation,’ unless there was strong reason so to do. In this case there is, in my opinion, no such reason, but the contrary. Sections 1 and 15 of the Act create an ‘ offence ’ and provide for its punishment. But for section 15, section 1 would create a misdemeanor punishable by indictment, fine and imprisonment. But offences, certainly offences of commission, are the offences of individuals, not of corporations. A corporation cannot have the mem rea.” The whole of that I venture to say is contrary to authority and contrary to the common law. “ I do not say that a corporation cannot be guilty of an offence of nonfeasance — it certainly can be ; and it has been so held as to a misfeasance ; but though if the Legislature pleased it might enact that a corporation should in a certain event be taken to have committed an offence, the presumption is that in speaking of ‘ offenders ’ it speaks of individuals. If a statute were to say that any person publishing a libel should be guilty of an offence, or that no person should publish a libel, a corpo¬ rate printing company publishing a libel would not be guilty in its corporate capacity.” My lords, I venture to say that that is unsound law on the authorities. “ But the individuals publishing would be the offenders. So for instance as to the sale of beer and spirits.” Just take that illustration, suppose a corporation should undertake to sell beer or spirits on the ground that because the Beer and Spirit Act said “ persons ” they were not within it. The Lord Chancellor : Suppose a newspaper published a libel, and it was carried on, as many newspapers are, by a joint stock company, would there be an action for libel against the paper? Mr. Benjamin : Most unquestionably, my lord. I think the case books are full of such cases. I think I shall call your lordships’ attention to specific authorities •on the subject. I think throughout this judgment Lord Justice Bramwell has started with a wrong basis, that the law is sustained by authorizing that the word “ per¬ sons ” always includes “corporations” when by the context it is not evident that corporation was intended to be excluded. Lord Blackburn : I confess I, like you, rather think the reasoning of the Lord Justice is a little beside the question and not quite accurate. I always myself thought that the law was that a corporation could commit an offence as much as an individual. Mr. Benjamin: Take this very example, for instance, of the sale of beer and spirits : “ No doubt, if there was strong reason for saying ‘ person ’ in this statute meant * corporation,’ one ought so to hold. As, for example, if the mischief to be prevented could not be otherwise. But that is not so here. For the individual offender may be got at.” With all submission, that is no reason at all. If the servant or shopman of a corporation sells poison, not being a pharmaceutical chemist and registered under the Act, it will be no answer to an action for the penalty to say that he did it as servant, whether of an indi¬ vidual or a corporation not qualified. If the act is in itself unlawful, it is not the less so because done as servant. If it would be lawful because the servant was qualified, though his employer was not, I think the statute is shown to be all the more reasonable, as in that case a corporation is on the same footing as a partnership, and there is no reason why it should not be. It may be asked, how is the ‘ keeping open shop ’ to be reached ; the servants do not keep it open ? ” His lordship’s answer is, “ No, but the directors or managers do ; they are the •offenders in that case.” " That is not, as I submit, an answer to the charge found in the special case, “ That this corporation kept open shop.” “ I cannot see how they could deny that they kept open this shop. They do — they do it in fact.” Then it is the directors who are keeping open the shop, not the corporation, according to ■his lordship. How about a director who is not present ? Lord Blackburn : I do not quite follow the Lord Justice Bramwell ’s decision when he seems to think that if it were shown that the directors or manager commit an offence it follows that the corporation do not. I confess I should have thought that as to a body corporate committing a nuisance, if you could indict the individuals I do not see that it would follow that the corporation would not be indictable. Mr. Benjamin : If you look at the next sentence it is a direct denial of a whole series of authorities. “ If they committed a public nuisance by smells, vapours or other¬ wise in the preparation, or (if supposable) in the sale of theirs drugs, they and not the corporation would be indictable.” Lord Blackburn : My impression certainly is that they and the corporation too would be liable. Mr. Benjamin: My lord, indictments of corporations for nuisances is one of the commonest things in the practice of the law. Then his lordship goes on : — “I see no reason then for including ‘corporation’ in the word ‘person.’ I see many the other way. It is remarkable that in this particular statute ‘person’ never includes ‘corporation’ in any other section.” Mr. Justice Mellor had pointed out that there are a series of the sections, providing for the future examination and admission of individuals into the Society. Of course those sections have no reference to corporations ; they are not going to submit to examination or qualifications. Lord Blackburn : No, but the great thing that strikes me about it is, that in every other instance, I think, but the 1st section, where the word “ person ” is used, it always is implied that the person is a man who can go through the examination and can become a chemist. Mr. Benjamin: My lord, my answer to that is, that I submit that is conclusive in our favour, because the Act assumes that the offence is to be committed by a person who could go through the examination. It is clear then that the corporation is a person that could not go through the examination, and is not intended by the Act to be one of the persons who is to keep the open shop. I will call your attention presently to the authorities as well as to the passages in the Act itself, which I have not yet called critical attention to. Then his lordship says : — “ It is manifest that ‘ persons ’ in the preamble keeping open shops, and ‘ persons ’ known as chemists and drug¬ gists, means individuals ; for they are ‘ persons ’ who it is expedient should possess a competent practical know¬ ledge of their business. A corporation as such cannot possess a competent practical knowledge.” Of course, the conclusion then drawn is that it may keep an open shop. I should draw the opposite conclusion. “ Then such ‘ persons ’ are to be examined, It is manifest ‘ persons’ there does not include corporations ; why should it in section 1 ? So ‘ persons ’ in section 3 who have been assistants cannot include corporations nor the ‘person’ in section 4 who is to be of full age, nor the ‘ persons ’ in section 5 who had been admitted pharmaceutical chemists, for no corporation had been, nor the ‘ person ’ in section 6, for a corporation never could have a certificate of com¬ petent skill, nor the ‘person’ in section 10, who is a person that may die. In short, ‘person,’ in no other section of this Act included corporation. Further than this, I am by no means certain that the statute is not levelled at the individual acting, and not (at least in all cases) his employer. Who would be liable under section 15 for compounding medicines of the British Pharmaco¬ poeia otherwise than according to its formularies ? Surely the actual person compounding. Section 16 supposes there may be a qualified assistant, and not a qualified master. Again, section 17, which especially provides that for certain matters the master is liable, seems to suppose that otherwise he would not be.” That is the passage to which I called attention. Lord Blackburn : Is that the real effect of section 17? Mr. Benjamin : I do not think it is so at all, my lord. Perhaps it will be as well to look at section 17 now, just in this connection. What section 17 says, is this: “It shall be unlawful to sell any poison of those which are in 74 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [July 24 1SS0. the first part of schedule A to this Act, or may hereafter he added thereto under section 2 of this Act, to any per¬ son unknown to the seller.” You see there it becomes abso¬ lutely necessary to know who is meant by the seller; it is a man who has not put on the wrapper, or cover, or label 1 Is he the person meant as the one who is to know the per¬ son applying, or is it the master? The Act says : “To any person unknown to the seller unless introduced by some person known to the seller, and on every sale of any such article the seller shall before delivery make, or cause to be made, an entry in a book to be kept for that purpose, stating in the form set forth in schedule F to this Act, the date of the sale, the name and address of the pur¬ chaser, the name and quantity of the article sold, and the purpose for which it is stated by the purchaser to be re¬ quired, to which entry the signature of the purchaser and of the person, if any, who introduced him shall be affixed ; and any person selling poison otherwise than is herein provided shall upon a summary conviction before two justices of the peace in England, or the sheriff in Scotland, be liable to a penalty not exceeding £5, for the first offence, and to a penalty not exceeding £10, for the second or any sub¬ sequent offence ; and for the purposes of this section the person on whose behalf any sale is made by any appren¬ tice or servant shall be deemed to be the seller.” There¬ fore that is proceeding no doubt on the assumption that the sale would be made on all occasions by the master ; but as this is in relation to a particular procedure to be adopted in the sale, that is to say wrapping up the box or bottle with the particular wrapper and cover and mark¬ ing it poison, and that the person shall be known to the seller, it was thought necessary, perhaps from excess of caution, to say that when we are speaking of this section we mean the master ; we do not mean it is enough that the person shall be known to the apprentice who sells it ; we do not mean it is enough that the apprentice knows him ; we mean that the master shall be responsible, even if the apprentice does not put the proper label on. Lord Watson: How does a man come to be known to a corporation. Mr. Benjamin : He cannot be known to a corporation. Lord Blackburn : It is not a very good specimen of legislation. Does it mean when it says the seller shall be deemed to be the person on whose behalf the sale is made more than that when the label is put on you are not to put the name of the apprentice, but to put the name of the master ? Mr. Benjamin : You see just above, it says you shall not sell to anybody you do not know. Lord Blackburn : Exactly. Mr. Benjamin : Then they say, when we say you shall not sell to any person you do not know or who is not introduced by somebody you know, we mean the master, not the apprentice. Lord Blackburn : That I have some little doubt about. A statement that the seller shall mean the master, the employer, not the employed, is very much more germane to the requirement that the name of the seller shall be on the label. Mr. Benjamin : It says “ shall not sell to any person unknown to the seller unless introduced by some person known to the seller.” That clearly implies that the precautions used for the public against the sale of poisons are not simply that the man who keeps the open shop for the sale must be qualified ; but he shall not, even although qualified, sell to the public at large, except under certain precautions, and the first thing is, before he sells to anybody, he must know the person to whom he is selling. Lord Watson : Or know that his master knows him. Mr. Benjamin: Yes, my lord; or if the person is un¬ known to the master, then the unknown person cannot get poison unless introduced by somebody that is known. Lord Blackburn : I confess —I do not know that it is very material — but I should have a difficulty in construing section 17 to say that if you have a qualified assistant who sells, and a person comes in and asks for a penny¬ worth of oxalic acid and that qualified assistant knows him perfectly well, he is obliged to say I cannot sell it unless you know the master. Lord Watson: Strictly, I rather think it would be so according to the terms of it. This clause of the statute seems to contemplate sales by a qualified person. Mr. Benjamin : Then, my lord, there are two things that the Act is prohibiting. We are not here on the open shop question ; we are supposing a man keeping an open shop who is really qualified, but that is not enough to protect the public. He shall not sell to anybody that comes in. Lord Blackburn: We are assuming here that the right people keep open the shop and that the right person is selling. I suggested, but that is a good deal beside the present question, I believe, that this referred to the label. Lord Watson: It comes very much to this, that the clause cannot well apply to a corporation selling. Mr. Benjamin : Quite so, my lord, and that therefore if what is required to keep open a shop and to sell poisons is that which this section says must be done in the sale of poisons, then the corporation cannot sell, because it cannot comply with the provisions of the Act which point out what is to be done when a person, one of the public., comes into the shop and asks for poison. Lord Watson : You may found an argument either way. You may say the Legislature intended to exclude corporations dealing in these articles by retail or that it had not these corporations in view in framing the law. Mr. Benjamin: It is possible to take that view; but then I should say we see by the preamble what is in¬ tended — to restrict and check the public sale of poisons to any customer that may come in. It goes very far in support of the opinion of the Lord Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Mellor, who think there is no doubt that the whole purview of the Act was to prevent the public going into a shop to buy poison from being poisoned by the incompetency of the proprietors or assistants. The Lord Chancellor: Suppose there is a corporation carrying on this kind of business ; it seems material that the words “ known to the seller ” may be capable of a sensible interpretation. A regular customer certainly would be known to the seller, although the seller could only act by his agents. Supposing in any other Act of Parliament the same words were used, where there was no question about the right of a corporation to carry on a business, the person with whom they had regular dealings, to whom they delivered goods, paid for his goods, and knew in any sense in which a corporation can know anything, would not he be a person known to the seller ? Mr. Benjamin : I think he would, my lord, I am bound to say; but at the same time, I think when you look at the 17th section it contemplates an individual person — the person who is selling, the individual who is selling, and the public who is going to buy the poison. Lord Blackburn : It probably does. Surely you would not say that in the case of a man who has carried on a business and died, and it was carried on by his executor or through a qualified assistant, and a person going in known to that qualified assistant, that it was a breach of the Act because he did not know the executor, who might be thirty miles away. Mr. Benjamin : No, my lord. I should say in the question as to the executor, it would be there considered that inasmuch as that particular case had been provided for, this particular requisition in section 17 could not be enforced. The Lord Chancellor : The corporation might know a customer with whom it had regular dealings. It could not have any other sort of knowledge. Mr. Benjamin : No, it could not. Lord Watson : I anticipate on both sides you will agree that it does not extend to corporations ; but you each found upon it a different conclusion. Mr. Benjamin : Yes, my lord. I say that inasmuch as the provisions of the Act contain things which do not July 24, 18S0.] THE PHAEMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 75 apply to a corporation, it is plain that corporations were not intended to sell. Lord Watson : Your adversaries say it is one of many illustrations which show that corporations were left out altogether. Lord Blackburn : One argument is, that as corpora¬ tions cannot do these various things, therefore it is meant to say they shall not carry on the trade at all. The ■other says, inasmuch as the persons are restrained from : trading only to prevent unqualified persons doing the act, and that as we should not extend it to sales in restraint of trade, we ought not to prevent a corporation carrying on business by qualified assistants. There are two opposite conclusions drawn from the same premises. Mr. Benjamin: Yes, my lord. Then the judgment proceeds: “Then section 18 and the following when they use the word ‘person’ clearly do not mean ‘corporation.’ There is this advantage, as I have said, in this construc¬ tion, that it does not exclude a corporation from the benefit of carrying on this business, nor the public from dealing with them.” It is a benefit in his lordship’s view for the public to deal with a corporation in poisons. “It is not needlessly in restraint of trade as it otherwise would be, at least not directly. If it does indirectly ■operate to preclude a corporation carrying on this trade, however qualified all its members may be; it is to be re¬ gretted; but then there is no need for making ‘person’ include ‘corporation,’ nor for creating the novelty of a corporate offence.” That novelty has been known since the time of Lord Coke certainly. “It only would operate against a corporation as it would against a partnership. Eurther, how is this the act of the corporation if it is un¬ lawful ? For if it is, it is ultra vires of the directors.” That is a singular result. Lord Blackburn : I think that argument has been used before ; but without success. If I remember rightly when someone brought an action of trespass or false imprisonment against the South Eastern Railway Com¬ pany, they said it could not possibly be ; that if their servants were doing wrong they must have been acting ultra vires ; but somehow or other the only effect of that ingenious argument was that the j ury gave about double the damages they would otherwise have done, That was Chilton v. The South Eastern Railway Company. Mr. Benjamin: Then his lordship says: “In the result, considering the way in which modern statutes are drawn, that corporations are specified where corporations are meant, that offences are wilful breaches of law or inattention to its commands and so the act of the in¬ dividual offending, that there is no reason for holding ■corporations to be within the Act, that there are reasons to the contrary, and that in no other section of this Act does ‘ persons ’ mean ‘ corporation,’ I am of opinion it does not in these sections. I am aware that the penalty is recoverable by plaint in the County Court, 15 and 16 Vic. c. 62 ; but the sum recovered is at the disposition of the Crown, section 14, and it is a ‘penalty,’ and the act an ‘offence,’ and, the person an ‘offender.’ I am aware also that there is ground for saying that under section 15 all of several partners keeping a shop must be qualified, though none attend, and the shopman need not be qualified. If so it may be said, so must all the share¬ holders and directors of a corporation. I do not know. The Act may have a more limited meaning, and be more reasonable. If not, still this furnishes no argu¬ ment in favour of ‘person’ meaning corporation.” Now, my lord, Lord Justice Baggallay adopted the argu¬ ment which my learned friend lays great stress upon, and which appears to me absolutely to have no bearing on the case. But I may be unable to appreciate it, because my friend laid great stress upon it. He said, “I will show you a large number of modern statutes in which, in the interpretation clause ‘ person ’ is said to mean ‘ cor¬ poration.’ It is not in this Act, and therefore in this Act, ‘ person ’ does not mean ‘ corporation.’ I cannot see the force of that argument. It may be that one hundred persons may take precaution to say that person means corporation, which is simply a restatement of the common law, whilst in other cases persons may be satis¬ fied in drafting statutes to rely upon the common law. But why the superabundant caution of some persons should operate against the confidence of others in relying upon the common law I do not see in the statutes relat¬ ing to these offences in which very plainly corporations are intended to be included. Lord Justice Baggallay says : “I agree in the opinion that this appeal should be allowed. In modern times when the Legislature has intended that the word ‘ person ’ or any other word primarily importing an individual in any particular statute shall include a corporation, it has been usual to introduce an interpretation clause, declaring that the word shall have such extended meaning. In the year 1868, the year in which the Act now under consideration was passed, at least four other Acts were passed into which such a clause was introduced ; namely, the Sea Fisheries Act, the Fair of Kildare Act, the Regulation of Railways Act, and the Artizans and Labourers Dwellings Act; and in another, the Irish Fairs Act, the word ‘owner’ was de¬ clared to have the same meaning. Now the omission from Lord Brougham’s Act of any general declaration that the word ‘ person ’ when used in subsequent statutes should include a corporation, and the absence from the Act now under consideration of any such interpretation clause, to my mind strongly supports the view that the Legislature had no intention that the word ‘ person ’ when used in the Act should include a corporation. It probably is the fact, as was suggested in argument, that at the time when the Act passed it was not in the con¬ templation of the Legislature that a corporate body would embark in the business of selling or of dispensing or compounding poisons, and that consequently it had no intention of either including or of excluding a corpora¬ tion when using the word ‘ person.’ Lord Watson: In Lord Brougham’s Act what is the definition of the word “ person ? ” Mr. Benjamin: It is cited in the Chief Justice’s judgment. All it says is that “ person ” in the singular shall mean “ persons ” in the plural, and that “persons” in the plural shall mean “person” in the singular, and that “males” shall mean “females” and “females ” “males,” and so on with a number of things. There is nothing said there whether “ person ” means “ corporations.” Still, really the argument is drawn from the fact that in a statute defining the meaning of certain expressions, the question whether “ person ” in¬ cludes “ corporations,” is not dealt with. This is the 4th section of the Act. In all cases words importing the masculine gender shall be taken to include the feminine, the singular to include the plural, and the plural the singular, unless the contrary as to gender or number is expressly provided. Lord Watson: The word “person” is not defined ? Mr. Benjamin: It is not defined at all. And how an argument can be drawn from the fact that an Act gives an interpretation of certain words but does not give an interpretation of this word, and that therefore “person” does not mean “corporation,” I am unable to appreciate. The Lor-d Chancellor : A corporation beyond doubt by the common law is a legal person, is it not ? Mr. Benjamin: Unquestionably, my lord. The Lord Chancellor : So that although the context might settle it one way or the other, yet if there be nothing repugnant in the context, why should it not be a legal as well as a natural person ? Mr. Benjamin: It is certainly determined by Lord Coke ; and it is not only so determined by a considered decision of the Court of Common Pleas, but by the House of Lords, as I shall show your lordship presently. Lord Blackburn : I do not understand it is questioned that “ person ” is wide enough to include “ corporation.” The argument against you is that the person in this statute is capable of going through an examination. 76 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [July 24, 188ft. The Lord Chancellor : That is another matter. Mr. Benjamin: When your lordships hear the other side you will find that I am not beating the air, that they do contend positively that the word “ person ” does not include “corporation.” Lord Blackburn: In these Acts. But I have not heard anybody say that “ person ” never could include “ corporation.” Mr. Benjamin: When Lord Coke was quoted in the Court below Lord Justice Bramwell said he did not pay any attention to it ; that it was only a dictum. Lord Watson: Certainly Lord Justice Baggallay’s opinion is founded on this that the Legislature not having said expressly in this Act that “ person ” should include “ corporation,” it must be assumed that they did not intend that it should be included. Mr. Benjamin : That is his view. It probably is the fact, as was suggested in the argument, that at the time the Act was passed it was not in the contemplation of the Legislature that a corporate body would embark in the business of selling or dispensing or compounding poisons. Lord Blackburn : But if the fact was that there were such bodies as the Apothecaries’ Hall in Liverpool, or the Apothecaries’ Company in London, where corpora¬ tions did carry on that business, it is a bold assumption that the Legislature did not provide for them. Mr. Benjamin: Lord Justice Baggallay goes on: — ‘ However, this may be, it must I think be admitted that although an Act may not contain a declaration that the word ‘ person ’ shall include a corporation, and although it may be clear that the Legislature could not be reasonably presumed to have any intention in the matter; yet, if it be clear from the general scope and purport of the Act that the selling, dispensing, or com¬ pounding of poisons by a corporation was or might be within the mischief intended to be guarded against, and if extending the meaning of the word ‘ person ’ so as to include corporation would enable the necessary protection to be given, such an interpretation might and ought to be adopted. But when I turn to the Act itself I can and nothing to lead me to such a conclusion.’’ To what conclusion ? That the sale, dispensing and compounding of poisons by corporations ought to be within the mischief of the Act. I cannot follow that. Lord Blackburn : If you read the few next lines you will see what he means. Mr. Benjamin : I am going to read them. “ The object of the Act is to prevent the selling, dispensing or com¬ pounding of poisons by unqualified persons. A corporation cannot of itself sell, dispense, or compound ; it can only do so by the aid of a servant or assistant, and if that servant or assistant is duly qualified in the manner required by the Act — as is admittedly the case with regard to the dispenser employed by the defendants — the object of the Act is obtained.” His lordship forgets that an individual, even with these precautions, is subject to the Act. He overlooked the fact that the offence is to keep open shop when you are not a qualified person. Lord Blackburn : Lord Justice Baggallay says this : — The object was to prevent the sale by unqualified persons, with a view to that, as ancillary to that, it was enacted, perhaps overlooking that it might be a hardship, that a person should incur a penalty if he kept an open shop. Then he says you have no occasion to extend that to corporations, because the main object of the Act was not to prevent people keeping shops open, but to prevent unqualified persons from selling. Mr. Benjamin : With all submission, my lord, I con¬ test the whole of that. I say that the purpose of the Act was to prevent the sale by unqualified persons. First, no one unqualified shall open a shop at all. Then the next thing comes as to the selling. In order to carry out the purposes of the Act no one unqualified shall have a shop to sell to the public anything that will poison the public at all. Then if he is qualified he may have a quali¬ fied assistant ; and the Act provides that the assistant may be qualified, and the bottles and boxes and so on shall be properly labelled ; for all of which the proprietor of the establishment is responsible. Who is the proprietor of this establishment ? The proprietor of this establishment is this company, which is Mr. Mackness under the name of a company ; he is keeping open shop ; he is doing this, or the company if you please — for it is legally constituted and I would rather it be considered that it is legally constituted — for the purpose of the prosecution is to have it established whether or not the Poisons Act is utterly non-existent as regards a company or corporation. If it is, of course Parliament must be applied to ; but if it is not, if the Act is fairly and clearly an Act prohibiting keeping open shop for the sale of poisons by anybody but a qualified person, then the exclusion operates as much against a corporation as against an individual. Lord Watson: Lord Justice Baggallay says, as I understand his judgment, that an individual can obtain a licence— -he may qualify. An individual who< conducts his business through a qualified assistant may comply, but a corporation cannot. That is his view. A corporation must conduct the business through some¬ one ; and if it does not conduct it through a qualified person, that person would be liable. Mr. Benjamin : No doubt the person would be liable ; but, inasmuch as the Legislature has said the proprietor must be qualified as well as the assistant - Lord Blackburn : It may have accidentally done that. You seem to have overlooked the curious way in which you are now arguing what the main object of the Act was. Keeping open shop was forbidden certainly, because it says : — “ It shall not be lawful for any person to sell or keep open shop for retailing, dispensing, or compounding poisons, or to assume or use the title chemist and drug¬ gist or chemist or druggist or pharmacist,” and so forth, unless such person is qualified. The main object of the Legislature is to prevent selling by an unqualified person. It is merely stuck in accidentally, “ shall not keep open shop.” You argue as if it were the mere object to give a monopoly to chemists and druggists. Mr. Benjamin : The line of the preamble, “ Whereas it is expedient for the safety of the public that persons keeping open shop for the retailing, dispensing, or com¬ pounding of poisons,” should be competent men. Those are the very first words of the preamble. The Lord Chancellor : It does not seem as if the idea of keeping open shop was separate in the mind of the Legislature from the act of selling, dispensing, or com¬ pounding poisons. It is not sticking up a sign or an¬ nouncing a business they had in view; it is actually business done. Mr. Benjamin : No doubt, my lord, the actual business- done is that which the statute pointed to. Lord Watson : The preamble is very curious when it says : — “ Whereas it is expedient for the safety of the public that persons keeping open shop for the retailing, dispensing, or compounding of poisons, and persons known as chemists and druggists, should possess competent practical knowledge.” Mr. Benjamin: I do not think it will be contended, nor has it been suggested by anybody, that the effect of keeping a shop open to the public for the sale of poisons- is not an offence within the Act. Lord Watson : It is quite clear that “ person ” in the- preamble, where it says, “ To that end all persons,” does not include corporations. Mr. Benjamin : His lordship goes on to say this : “Andi in the view I take of the Act, the protection intended to- be given to the public is sufficiently secured in the case of a corporation keeping open a shop for selling, dis¬ pensing, or compounding of poisons, for in my opinion the seller referred to in the first section is the actual seller, and not the individual or corporation on whose behalf he may act, and this view is supported by the language of the 17th section, which when dealing, not with the simple sale of poisons, but with selling parti- July 24, 1880.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 77 cular poisons without the adoption of special precautions, imposes a comparatively small penalty on the seller, but declares that for the purposes of that section the person on whose behalf the sale is made shall be deemed to be the seller, thus implying, that except for the purpose of that section the person reftrred to in the Act as selling, means the person actually selling, and not the person by whom he is employed.” I think, my lord, that inference is quite untenable. “ I need not refer to many sections of the Act which are quite inapplicable to the case of a corporation, as they had been pointed out in detail by Lord Justice Bramwell. In the absence, then, of any declaration in the Act that the word ‘ person ’ is to include a corporation, and not gathering from the general scope and purport of the Act that there is any necessity in the interest of the public that any such interpretation should be given to the word, I have arrived at the con¬ clusion that such an interpretation ought not to be put upon it, and that this appeal should be allowed.” Then, my lord, the Lord Justice Thesiger’s judgment is one which I have read very carefully, because it looked to me for a long time, reading his reasons, that he was going to decide in our favour. Lord Watson: He expi esses a doubt. Mr. Benjamin : He is very doubtful. He saj-s : “ I also am of opinion, not without doubt, that this appeal should be allowed. The question for determination is whethe r an incorporated company is subject to the pro¬ hibition contained in section 1, and liable to pay the penalty imposed in section 15 of the Pharmacy Act, 1868, or in other words, whether the term ‘person,’ used in these sections, includes such a company. In dealing with this question, I start with the axiom that the term ‘ person ’ is, in legal phraseology, wide enough to include not merely natural persons, that is, individuals, but, arti¬ ficial pei sons, such as corporations, aggregate as well as sole. I start at the same time with the undisputed fact that the practice in modern statutes where corpora¬ tions are intended to be affected is either to expressly name them or to use in reference to them the term ‘person,’ with an interpretation clause expressly pro¬ viding that cox-poratlons are intended to be included in the term.” I beg your loi'dships to note that I dispute the fact which is there stated to be undisputed. I say there are a great many cases in which people put that in ; but thei-e are hundreds of statutes in which it is not in. “ As a proper resultant of the apposition between the axiom and the practice, it appears to me that the term ‘ person ’ when contained in a modern Act of Pai-lia- ment should never be construed to include corporations, except where, first, the term is expressly interpreted as including them ; or, secondly, the context of the Act clearly shows that they are so included ; or, thirdly, the object and scope of the Act peremptorily l-equh-e them to be so included, and the context does not clearly negative a construction to that effect.” I venture to say, my lords, this is the first time that that mode of construing the word ‘ person” has ever appeared in a decision ; on the contrary I challenge my learned friends to find a case in which the word “ person” is not held to include corpora¬ tions unless by the context it must naturally be excluded. Lord Blackburn : I suppose really the argument of the appellants used against you here is that you are always to look to the nature of the Act. They always go upon that, that they are excluded here because of various things which no corporation could do. I do not know that there is much cause to inquire into it. Lord Watson : The proposition you have to meet is that stated by his lordship, not any of these questions whether the terms of this statute did not exclude corporations. Mr. Benjamin : “ Neither the first nor the second condition exists in the pai-ticular Act under considera¬ tion; but for a long time I have doubted whether the judgment of the Court below might not be supported upon the third. The object of the Act is that of providing for the safety of the public in the matter of the sale of poisons. The means by which that object is proposed to be attained is, inter alia, that of subjecting those who keep open shop for the retailing, dispensing or compounding of poisons to certain conditions and restrictions. Corporations may keep open shop, their doing so without proper safeguards may expose the public to the mischief against which the Act is intended to guard. There is, therefore, a strong- presumption d prioi'i that they would be made subject to the same conditions and restrictions as those to which individuals would be subjected, or at least, to some condi¬ tions and restrictions that would serve to the same end. Proceeding a step further it may be said that a statutory provision under which a particular thing is made unlaw¬ ful for any individual to do, except under certain condi¬ tions, contains an indication that the thing itself is intended to be entii-ely prohibited except under those conditions,” (there we have exactly our contention) “ and consequently cannot be done by a cox-poration even though the conditions are in their nature such as cannot under any circumstances be complied with by them.” That is a very fair statement of our c -intention. “ Lastly, a penalty, by which the prohibition is to be enforced, recoverable by civil suit, is as applicable to corporations, who may, even under certain circumstances, be the subject of indictment, as it is to individuals. Not¬ withstanding, however, the force of these considerations, which still press themselves upon me, I have come to the conclusion that the whole contents of the Act too clearly point to individuals aloixe being intended by the term ‘pei-son ’ to allow of that term being held to include cor¬ porations in the 1st and 15 th sections. I do not propose to repeat what has already been said by Lord Justice Bramwell upon this point. He has shown conclusively that the pi-eamble and every section of the Act, putting aside for the moment the two sections whose meaning- is in dispute, when using the term ‘ pei-son ’ or ‘ pei-sons ’ i*efer to individuals alone. But in addition to what he has poiixted out I find in the first section itself evidence that the words ‘ any person ’ in the eaidier part of that section are limited to individuals and cannot be extended to corporations, for in a sub¬ sequent part of the same section the woi*d ‘ pei-son’ is again used with such a context as absolutely forbids its application to a corporation, and yet in such a l-elation to the same word contained in the earlier part of the section as to grammatically require that it should receive the same construction. I do not think that under such cii*cumstances the Court ought to strain the language of the Act so as to make it include corporations, even if it were clear that the mischief intended to be pi-ovided against would otherwise in the case of companies keeping open shop for the sale of poisons be remediless. But I fetl bound to add that I am by no means satisfied, that although a corporation as a separate entity be not liable to the penalty which is sought to be r. covered, in this case the individual members of the corporation, whether direc¬ tors of a company or otherwise, may not be liable, and thus the mischief be remedied. I prefei-, howevei’, to give no definite opinion upon this point, for it involves the question whether the Legislature intended or not to prac¬ tically put an absolute veto upon the keeping open shop for the sale of drugs by tx-ading companies, and the absence from the Act of any express reference to such companies is almost equally difficult to be accounted for upon the notion that the Legislature had that intention as upoix the notion that the Legislatui-e did not think of the matter at all, and thereby a casus omissus has occurx-ed.” Your lordships are now in possession of the views of the several judges on the point, and it becomes my duty to call attention particularly to the language of the Acts, and to the authorities in relation to the nxeaning of the word “ peison ” as including corpoi'ations. Now, my lord, the authority produced in relation to persons, including corporations, wras this : in the second Coke’s Institute, p. 78 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [July 24, ISSa. 720, is the exposition of the statutes 39 Elizabeth and the 21st James I. concerning the erection of hospitals, and the Act begins in this way : “ Be it enacted by the authority of this present Parliament that all and every person and persons seised of an estate in fee simple, their heirs, executors, administrators,” and so forth, “may set up a hospital,” and Lord Coke, to the words “every person or persons ” has a note at the foot of page 721; — “All and every person and persons.” These words regularly do extend to any body politic or corporate, but not to such as are restrained by Acts of Parliament to alien ; but doth extend to such bodies politic or corporate as may alien, as mayors, com¬ monalties, burgesses, and the like, and to all other persons whatsoever.” These words regularly do extend to any body politic or corporate. Now upon that being cited it was said to be simply an obiter dictum, so to say. It was in this house so argued by a learned counsel, Mr. Kindersley, to be of no authority, a mere obiter dictum, and your lordships will find that in the case of the Cor¬ poration of Newcastle v. The Attorney-General and others, in 12 Clarke and Finnelley, p. 402, Mr. Kindersley in argument, at p. 411, said: “ There is no decided case putting a construction on this part of the Act. Lord Coke commenting on the Act says,” and then he quotes Lord Coke’s note, and he says : “ This is the opinion of a great authority no doubt ; but it is an opinion in the closet, not arrived at in discussion, a mere dictum, not formed by any decision of the court, and the opposite construction is put on the words in the statute of cases by Lord Brougham. When the decision came to be given, the Lord Chancellor, who was Lord Lyndhurst, said “ that comment of Lord Coke, which may be said to be a contemporaneous exposition of the Act has never been questioned ; it has been accepted by everybody since his time, and no doubt numerous charitable corporations depend upon it. The Act itself enumerates the classes who were excepted as being incapable of creating an instrument, and it is said that such a construction is to be put on the Act as should be beneficial. I do not think this House will feel justified in putting a construc¬ tion upon the Act, inconsistent with that commentary of Lord Coke.” Lord Cottenham said: “I agree in that view. We are not likely to overlook Lord Coke on this subject, but that does not relieve the respondents,” etc. Lord Lyndhurst referred to the terms of the statute and said there were exceptions. The Lord Chancellor : He does not say that “persons” in every statute includes corporation. Mr. Benjamin : No, my lord, he does not, but he says : “These words regularly do extend to any body politic.” Of course you may find it excluded in the statute. Lord Watson: The argument proceeded on that same statute of Elizabeth, I understand, in that case. Mr. Benjamin : Quite so, my lord. Lord Blackburn : Is not a body politic a person at law ? Mr. Benjamin : Not only that, but unquestionably Mr. Justice Blackstone in his commentaries says that persons are either natural or artificial. Lord Blackburn : But still that comes very far indeed from grappling with the real question. If a person is to be duly qualified who passes an examination, then it cannot mean corporation. Lord Watson : If this Act contained a provision that certain corporations should be exempted from clause 16, that would be a strong indication that all other corpora¬ tion were included. Mr. Benjamin : Taking my authorities and arguments in the logical order in which I have placed them, I will now call your lordships’ attention to the case of the Mayor of Hereford v. Martin in the 15th Law Times, N.S. 187. The statute said this. It was an Act for the supplying with gas the city of Hereford, and it said : “If any per¬ son or persons shall carelessly or negligently break, destroy, throw down, break or injure any lamp or lamps owned, or to be set up or belonging to said company ” — (That is one clause) — “ or by any person or persons at his- or their private expense”; then there was a penalty to be recovered. The defendant was sued for having broken by accident a lamp-post set up by the Corporation of Hereford; and the defence was, “I am only liable to action under this penal statute if I break a lamp owned by a person who has set up at his private expense a lamp. You are not a person or persons; you are a corporation.” It was a very strong Court, composed of Chief Justice Erie, Mr. Justice Williams, Mr. Justice Byles, and Mr. Justice Keating. Erie, Chief Justice, said, “I am of opinion the case must be sent back to the magistrates. The information was founded upon an accidental breaking of a lamp pillar within the city of Hereford. The question for us is whether the 5th Geo. IV. gives the corporation a right to recover damages under such circumstances under the words ‘ person or persons.’ I think it does. The words upon which the matter turns are : ‘ Set up at his or their private expense.’ The lamps belonging to the appel¬ lants were set up by funds belonging to them in their corporate capacity. The statute could not have been intended to give less protection to the corporation than to private individuals.” Lord Blackburn : The case seems to have been de¬ fended, not on the ground that a corporation was not a person, but that the words “ private expense ” cut down the meaning and prevented it applying to a public body, which is intelligible. Mr. Benjamin : One of the judges said that. Mr. Justice Byles concurred. Lord Blackburn : That is an intelligible argument. I confess I was thoroughly astonished to think that the justices could have said, “You may break with impunity a lamp belonging to the corporation.” Mr. Benjamin: Not that you could break it with impunity, but that you could not proceed under this special Act for a penalty. Lord Blackburn: It must be the same thing nearly. But if they were arguing that the special Act gave a penalty in favour of those who put it up at private expense it was an arguable point that the corporation who- put it up at the public expense were not within it. Mr. Benjamin : Mr. Justice Byles said : — “ I am of the same opinion. This case falls within the very words of the Act. Persons are by Blackstone divided into natural and artificial, and the latter includes corporations. The enactment is one under which a party is to obtain recom¬ pense, and therefore the words ‘private expense’ should be interpreted broadly.” Keating, Justice, says : — “I am of the same opinion. The object of the Act is clear — to protect the lamps belonging to the corporation as well as those of any other person. The question is whether, then, is anything in the words ‘ private expense ' to prevent this object being carried out. I think the magistrates ought to have convicted.” There appear to have been two arguments. One is, that “persons” does not include “corporations;” secondly, that “at the expense of the corporation ” is not “ private expense.” Those seem to have been the two arguments. Erie, Justice, repelled the second argument, and Keating, Justice, referred to both, as well as Byles, Justice. The case, therefore, decides this at all events. This was a case in which a penalty was imposed on those who should do certain damage to lamp-posts set up by a person or persons at their private expense, and it was held that that included corporations. Now, my Lord Blackburn, will probably remember the case of Terry v. The Brighton Aquarium, Law Reports, 10 Queen’s Bench, 306. Lord Blackburn: I remember the case, but I do not remember that it had anything to do with this point. Mr. Benjamin : The first thing I have to observe on that is, that it never was intended that a corporation, could not be made liable for a penalty and could not be made liable for just such a thing as was done in the pre¬ sent case. The case is a short one : “ The defendants are J y 24, 1880.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 79 the owners of the Brighton Aquarium, a building which consists of chambers below the level of the ground,” and so forth. An action was brought against the defendants to recover a penalty under the 21 Geo. III. cap. 49, for keeping open — the same language as this — a place of entertainment, or amusement, on the Lord’s day, or Sun¬ day. It was held that the Aquarium was a place of en¬ tertainment ov amusement within the statute, but nobody (contended that the defendants were not liable. Lord Blackburn : If I remember Bishop Porteus’ Act, ’there is a string of words including “corporation ” -amongst those who are made liable. The thing which I reluctantly felt myself bound to say was that it was within the Act, but as far as I can remember, it was sug¬ gested that “corporation” was not within the Act. I think there were words which included everything. Mr. Benjamin : The Act is here, my lord, I was going to call attention to it. These are the words : “ Whereas certain houses, rooms or places within the cities of London and Westminster or in the neighbourhood thereof have of late frequently been opened for public entertain¬ ment or amusement upon the evening of the Lord’s day commonly ealled Sunday ; and at other houses, rooms, or places within the said cities or in the neighbourhood thereof under pretence of inquiring into religious •doctrines and explaining texts of Holy Scripture, debates have frequently beeir held on tbe evening of the Lord’s day concerning divers texts of Holy Scripture, by persons unlearned and incompetent to explain the same, to the corruption of good morals, and to the encouragement of irreligion and profaneness. Be it enacted, that from and after the passing of this present Act any house, room, or other place which shall be opened or used for public entertainment, or amusement, or for publicly debating on any subject whatever, upon any part of the Lord’s day called Sunday, and to which persons shall be admitted by the payment of money or by tickets sold for money, shall be deemed a disorderly house or place ; and tbe keeper of such house, room, or place shall forfeit the sum of £200 for every day that such house, room, or place shall be opened or used as aforesaid on the Lord’s ■day.” Not a word said about “person” or “corpora¬ tions.” The word was “ keeper.” Lord Blackburn : You are right in saying that no point then was raised about it being kept by a corporation. Mr. Benjamin : What I was going to say with reference to it was this : “ The keeper of such house, room or place, shall forfeit tbe sum of £200 for every day such house or room is opened or used.” Now, the turn of words is undoubtedly different in the two Acts. In the Pharmacy Act it is that no person shall keep open shop. This Act says, places of entertainment on Sunday even¬ ing shall not be kept open, and the keeper shall be liable. The two Acts, and the mischief they intend to meet, are •exactly analogous. The language was in the one case, the person who keeps open the shop, and in the other the keeper of an open place of amusement. Lord Blackburn : I can always allow a great deal of latitude to argument; but when you say that the object of Bishop Porteous, who said that where people who held a debating society that was wrong, and that there¬ fore anybody who on Sunday opened a public house of entertainment should be deemed to keep a disorderly house, that this is the same as this Pharmacy Act of 1868, I do not understand it. Mr. Benjamin : I do not say the same, I say analogous. The Act of 1868 provides against the keeping of an open shop to sell poisons. That is, the physical poisons. The other Act was an Act against keeping open an estab¬ lishment of amusement on Sunday evenings where they were spreading moral poison. The difference in the language of the two Acts has not in the least degree reference to the fact whether the keeping open of the place was by an individual or by a corporation. In either case it was those who kept open the §hop. Lord Blackburn : If Bishop Porteus’ Act had said that keeping open a place on Sunday, unless it was by a person duly qualified as being a clergyman, it would be blas¬ phemy, then I think you would be right in saying they are analogous ; but the words are not at all the same. Mr. Benjamin : In Terry v. The Brighton Aquarium it was a corporation and there was no attempt on the i part of the very able counsel, Mr. Manisty, who was for the defendants, to say that a corporation could not be guilty of an offence — it goes at all events to that extent — and punishable by penalty which was recoverable in the way pointed out by the Act. To that extent the decision is absolutely in point, and that is one of the points raised in this case. Now, my lord, on the question as to liability of a corporation. I do not know whether that is intended to be raised afresh here, but I call attention to two decisions which appear to us conclusive on the point. They are both mentioned in the judgments, but where they are found is not mentioned. The first is the case of the Queen v. The Birmingham and Gloucester Railway Company, 3 Queen’s Bench, 223. I will only read the marginal note of this in order to curtail the dis¬ cussion. “A corporation aggregate may be indicted by their corporate name for disobedience to an order of justices requiring such corporation to execute works pursuant to a statute, and if such indictment be ordered by the assizes or sessions where parties cannot appear by attorney, the proper course is to remove it into this Court by certiorari , to compel appearance by the justices.” That was for nonfeasance. The question of nonfeasance not being that which an Act of Parliament required, the point came up again in the case of the Queen v. The Great Northern of England Railway, 9 Queen’s Bench, 315. This was a case which involved misfeasance by a corporation. It was argued that although a corporation might be liable to indictment for nonfeasance, a corpora¬ tion could not be guilty of misfeasance because it could not have, as Lord Justice Bramwell says, the mens rea. The considered judgment of the Court was delivered by Chief Justice Lord Denman : “The question is whether an indictment will lie at common law against a corporation for a misfeasance, it being admitted in conformity with undisputed decisions that an indictment may be main¬ tained against a corporation for nonfeasance. All the preliminary difficulties as to the service and execution of process, the mode of appearing, and pleading, and en¬ forcing judgment are by this admission swept away. But the argument is that for a wrongful act a corporation is not amenable to an indictment, though for a wrongful omission it undoubtedly is ; assuming in the first place that there is a plain obvious distinction between the two species of offence. No assumption can be more un¬ founded. Many occurrences may be easily conceived full of annoyance and danger to the public and involving blame in some individual or some corporation of which the most acute person could not clearly define the causes or ascribe them with more correctness to mere negligence in pro¬ viding safeguards or to an act rendered improper by nothing but want of safeguards. If A. is authorized to make a bridge with parapets, but makes it without them, does the offence consist in the construction of the un¬ secured bridge, or in the neglect to secure it ? But if the distinction were always easily discoverable, why should a corporation be liable for the one species of offence and not for the other ? The startling incongruity of allow¬ ing the exemption is one strong argument against it. The law is often entangled in technical embarrassments, but there is none here. It is as easy to charge one person or a body corporate with erecting a bar across a public road as with the non-repair of it, and they may as well be compelled to pay a fine for the act as for the omission. Some dicta occur in old cases, ‘ a corporation cannot be guilty of treason or of felony.’ It might be added ‘ of perjury or offences against the person.’ The Court of Common Pleas lately held that a corporation might be sued in trespass ; but nobody has sought to fix them with acts of immorality. These plainly derive 80 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [July 24, 1SS0. their character from the corrupted, mind of the person committing them, and are violations of the social duties that belong to men and subjects. A corporation which as such has no such duties cannot be guilty in these cases ; bwt they may be guilty as a body corporate of com¬ manding acts to be done to the nuisance of the com¬ munity at large. The late case of Regina v. Birmingham and Gloucester Railway Company was confined to the state of things then before the Court which amounted to nonfeasance only ; but was by no means intended to de.iy the liability of a corporation for a misfeasance.” Then the Court holds indictment is perfectly maintain¬ able. So that the considered judgment of the Coui't in two cases is that a corporation may be guilty of an offence. There are some offences which of necessity it cannot be guilty of. A corporation qud corporation cannot commit a rape, or commit a murder; the persons who are members of a corporation may be guilty of one thing or the other. But a corporation may commit a fraud, and the records of your lordships’ House are full of cases in which frauds committed by corporations are inquired into. In all these matters, therefore, it is necessary to refer to the particular statute under con¬ sideration in order to apply the authority. Now, assuming as I have, that a corporation may be guilty of an offence, I ought to call your lordships’ attention to 7 and 8 George IV. cap. 28, section 14. It appears that the statute is not, as cited by one of their lordships, inapplicable to the case before your lordships. This is the language of the statute. The statute is entitled, an Act for further improving the Administration of J ustice in Criminal Cases in England, section 1 4 is this : “ That wherever this or any other statute relating to any offence, whether punishable upon indictment or summary conviction, in describing or re¬ ferring to the offence, or the subject matter on or with respect to which it shall be committed, or the offender or the party affected or intended to be affected by the offence, hath used or shall use words importing the singu¬ lar number or the masculine gender only, yet the statute shall be understood to include several matters as well as one matter, and several persons as well as one person, and females as well as males, and bodies corporate as well as individuals, unless it be otherwise specially pro¬ vided or there be something in the subject or context repugnant to such construction ; and wherever any for¬ feiture or penalty is payable to a party aggrieved, it shall be payab’e to a body corporate in every case where such body shall be the party aggrieved.” So that “ person ” includes the plaintiff or defendant, and it includes a corporation, whether the party aggrieved or the party that has committed the offence — it is to be within the statute. It is true that this is said : “ Where- ever this or any other statute relating to any offence, whether punishable upon indictment or summary convic¬ tion,” but our argument, if upon the attention which Parliament bestows on an offence by a corporation, it is held that even in grave offences the word “ person ” shall include a corporation, when the enactment is directed against an offence punishable by indictment or summary conviction, a fortiori, is the corporation included in the word “person,” when it is an offence of a much minor consequence, and which is simply punishable by an offence by civil pi’ocess. I do not say that the Act directly covers it in exact language, but I say it shows the view which Parliament takes of statutes using the word “ person ” alone, and in reference to corporations. Now, my lords, there is a statute, which it is but just to my learned friends and to the learned Court to say, was not quoted in the Court below, on the very subject of the apothecaries and pharmaceutical chemists. It is a public Act. It is the 15th Geo. III. cap. 194. Now, my lord, in that Act there is a series of provisions exactly in conformity with the provisions in this Act, regulating the practice of apothecaries, and from the beginning of that Act it uses the word “ persons ” throughout, and in section 3 the masters and wardens are empowered to enter the shop of any person or persons whatsoever, using or exercising the art and mystery of an apothecary, and to fine such persons. The principal clause, my lord, is this 20th section, “ and be it enacted that if any person, except such as are actually practising as such, shall after the 1st day of August, 1815, act or practise as an apothecary in any part of England and Wales without having obtained such certificate as afore¬ said, every person so offending shall for every offence forfeit the sum of £20.” Throughout the Act there are various provisions, all of which relate to persons. Then, my lord, the 30tli section of the Act says this : “ Pro¬ vided always, and be it further enacted that no action or suit shall be brought or prosecuted against any person or persons, body or bodies politic, or corporate, for anything done in pursuance of this Act after six calendar months next after the act committed.” Now, the Act had not said a word about corporations being guilty of anything wrong ; it had hitherto spoken of persons being wrong. Lord Blackburn: That is to protect them against actions. Mr. Benjamin : Section 29 provides for that. The Lord Chancellor : No, no. That is merely saving their general rights. Then section 30 says there shall be a limit of the time within which such actions or suits may be brought against persons or bodies politic or cor¬ porate, for anything done in pursuance of the Act. Consequently, as I understand it, it does not mean a thing done against the Act ; but if in consequence of the Act the Society of Apothecaries were to do something in respect of which an action was brought against them, it might be said you are too late, the time is limited. Mr. Benjamin : What I am pointing out is that this section 30 deals with bodies corporate as being included in the Act, whereas throughout the Act you have nothing except persons dealt with up to that period. Lord Watson: It does not clearly show — at least as you read it — that it meant to refer to the penalty clause of the Act. If it had been a limitation of the time for bringing the action for penalties, it would have been very strong in your favour. Lord Blackburn : If] any person or body politic do what this Act contemplated, they might be liable to have an action brought against them for it, which action shall be brought within six months. That does not at all show that the word “person” means body corporate. Mr. Benjamin : No, my lord, but the Act had before that not spoken of corporations, or of anything but per¬ sons as liable under the Act. Lord Blackburn : It is not liable under the Act ; it is protected, because they do something under the Act. The Lord Chancellor : I should be strongly inclined to think that it relates to actions that might be brought against the Society of Apothecaries for acts done; for example, under the 3rd section of the Act it gives them power to enter into other people’s shops, to search, cer¬ tify, and determine whether the medicines, and so on, are wholesome, and if they find anything false, unlawful, deceitful, corrupt or hurtful, they may burn, or otherwise destroy, and so on. A man may say that what you have destroyed is not deceitful, or any other of these epithets. Lord Watson: There are a great many police and other statutes constituting offences, which contain that clause, but that was, I thought, always understood to be for the protection of those putting the Act in force. The Lord Chancellor: It is for anything done in pur¬ suance of the Act. Mr. Benjamin: It is possible the Act may be framed in that way, although certainly up to that part of the Act, there had been nothing to be done by any corpora¬ tion. Now, my lords, I wish to take this Act itself, the Act of 1868, and call your attention to its provisions. The further hearing was adjourned until Thursday. In consequence of the length to which the legal report has extended, notice of several communications is unavoid¬ ably postponed. July 3%, 1880..] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 81 Cjjoe ^{rornmtnlia:l laitmal .^i ^ „ — SATURDAY, JULY 31, 1880, Communications for the Editorial department of this Journal , books for review, etc., should be addressed to the Editor, 17, Bloomsbury Square. Instructions from Members and Associates respecting the transmission of the Journal should be sent to Mr. Elias Bbemridge, Secretary, 17, Bloomsbury Squai'e, W.C. Advertisements, and payments for Copies of the Journal, Messrs. Churchill, New Burlington Street, London , W. Envelopes indorsed “ Fharm. Journ.” THE APPEAL CASE IN THE HOUSE OF LORDS. Though it is only by increasing the usual size of the Journal, by adding to it an eiglit page supple¬ ment, that we are able to place before our readers this week the remainder of the arguments in this case and the judgment of the House of Lords, we have deemed it desirable not to delay the publica¬ tion any longer, and for that reason are compelled to defer “ The Month,” as well as other matter, until next wqek, Hitherto, if we may judge from the absence of any critical reference to the case in most of the daily papers, it would not seem to have attracted much attention outside the circle of those especially interested. The only paper in which we have as yet seen any comments upon the case is the Daily News, and there it is dealt with more as furnishing an illustration of the curious and wholly artificial difficulties caused by the technical rules which have been established by the judges for the construction of statutes, than as involving questions affecting the safety of the public. The only way in which this latter aspect of the case is referred to is by the expression of an opinion that the ultimate decision of the House of Lords is no doubt in accordance with common sense. The consideration that has mainly led to this opinion would appear to be the circum¬ stance that in the particular case in question the s ale of poisons was actually conducted by a manager who was a qualified chemist, and for this reason our contemporary considers that the Pharmacy Act was practically obeyed. T his, we take it, is the extent to which the decision of the House of Lords can be regarded, as the Daily News thinks, as being in accordance with common sense unless, the decision is to have the effect of im¬ posing upon other associations or limited liability companies carrying on the business of a chemist and druggist the obligation to employ qualified chemists as the persons actually engaged in selling and dispensing drugs and medicines. That, however, is an obligation which is not imposed upon such com panies by the Pharmacy Act according to either the view of the respondents or that of the appellants in this case. According to the latter view a com-i pany is excluded from the possibility of carrying on Third Series, No. 527. the business of a chemist and druggist because it cannot possibly become qualified as the Act provides, according to the other a company is outside the pro¬ visions of the Act and in so far is not required, in th,e interests of the public to take any cognizance of qualification either on the part of its members or of the assistants: actually engaged in carrying on the selling and dispensing of drugs and medicines. Certainly the Pharmacy Act does not contain any specific provision requiring that in such cases assis¬ tants should be qualified. However, Lord Black¬ burn expressed himself as being strongly inclined to think that a corporation would be liable to penalties under the 15th section of the Pharmacy Act if it caused an unqualified person to conduct sales and it could be brought home to the corpora¬ tion that it did deliberately cause the person to infringe the Act. On the principle qui facit per aliumfacit per se, therefore, he held that corporations were not wholly outside the Act. A. company carrying on the business of a chemist and druggist with unqualified assistants might, it is true, be held responsible for the breach of law com¬ mitted by its servants, but we fail to perceive why that should make companies exempt from the pro¬ visions to which individuals are subject in carrying on the same business and we equally fail to believe that in the interest of the public it would be a sufficient guarantee for the employment of qualified assistants by such companies. It was from such a view of the ca^e that the Council of the Pharmaceutical Society determined to continue the prosecution of the London and Provincial Supply Association beyond that stage, when it was in fact simply a prosecution of an individual carrying on his business under that designation. It was from such a view that the determination to take that course is to be regarded — as the President of the Society has pointed out in his letter to the Daily News — as the result of reading the duty of the Society by the light of common sense, and that in. that light the Society was justified in expecting a verdict in its favour. Moreover, in considering the position of the Society in this litigation, the history of the case should not be overlooked. The drug business of the London and Provincial Supply Association, now con¬ ducted as that of a limited liability company, was up to the beginning of 1878 conducted by one indi¬ vidual, who not being on the register of ehemists and druggists was forbidden by law to practise as a chemist and druggist. The Pharmaceutical Society in exercise of the duty assigned exclusively to it by the Pharmacy Act of 1868 commenced proceedings against him for infringing that Act and as a matter of course obtained from him the penalty appertain¬ ing to the offence. At the same time he tendered through his legal representative an assurance that he “ was engaged on arrangements to terminate any violation of the law. ” It tinned out eventually that 82 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [July 31, 1880. Ills process for arriving at this result was not the discontinuance of the business that he had been unlawfully carrying on ; but simply the association with himself of six other persons and the constitu¬ tion of a company under the Limited Liability Act for the purpose of continuing to carry on the busi¬ ness otherwise exactly as it had been carried on before. When that was found to be the case it was by the light of “ common sense ” that the Council of the Pharmaceutical Society formed the opinion that since the Legislature had declared, in the interests of the public, that no person not being on the register of chemists and druggists should keep open shop for the sale of drugs and dispensing of medicines, it was intended that no company or association of such unqualified persons should do so. And equally by the light of “common sense” the Council came to the conclusion that its duty was to have recourse to the power conferred upon it by the Pharmacy Acts for the repression of practices declared to be unlawful, and, therefore, to repeat against the seven persons constituting the London and Provincial Supply Association Limited the pro¬ secution which had been successfully conducted against one of that number when the business was carried on by him alone. It is with considerable reason, therefore, that the President of the Pharmaceutical Society has, in his letter to the Daily News , taken objection to the remark that the decision of the House of Lords was plainly in accordance with “ common sense,” in so far as that remark may suggest the inference that the course adopted by the Council of the Pharmaceuti¬ cal Society exhibited a deficiency of common sense. That the action of the Society’s executive is not to be thus regarded is moreover shown by the judgments given by the Lord Chief Justice Cockburn and by Mr. J ustice Mellor when the case was heard in the Court of Queen’s Bench. In their view the object of the Pharmacy Act was to protect the public against the possible consequences of unqualified persons carrying on the business of a chemist and druggist, and they held that as it was unlawful for any individual persons to sell and dispense poisons, un¬ less duly registered in accordance with the Act, it could not be the intention of the law that any association of such persons should do what they were individually prohibited from doing. Certainly this view appears to bear the impress of common sense, and to be one that ought to receive general acquiescence, unless we are to disregard the obvious meaning of the term common sense, and look upon the faculty it represents as being equally many sided with other forms of opinion. But notwithstanding the decision of the question from another point of view, and the fact that the judgment of the House of Lords has not literally endorsed the opinion of the Society’s executive re¬ specting the inability of an association of unregistered persons to carry on the business of a chemist and druggist, it is satisfactory to note that in some degree the spirit of the Pharmacy Act has been upheld and recognized as appropriate to the condi¬ tions it has to deal with. Throughout the hearing of the appeal the remarks of their lordships gave abun¬ dant indication that they perceived the necessity for proper qualification on the part of those engaged in the sale of drugs and in dispensing medicine. Whether it be lawful or unlawful for associations of unregistered persons to carry on this business, whether or not they can be compelled in carrying on such business to employ only qualified men to conduct it, there is at least some assurance that the moral effect of their lordships’ remarks on this point will be felt and appreciated almost as forcibly as if they constituted an exposition of the actual law. In so far the Pharmaceutical Society has good reason to be satisfied that it has been successful in upholding the fundamental principle of its existence and that both as regards its duty to the public and to the trade it represents it has rendered some service by carrying out to the end the litigation upon which it was deemed fitting to devote so much time and money. In our own body widely different opinions have been entertained as to the propriety of entering upon this litigation. As will be seen from some of the letters published this week the decision of the House of Lords has not been altogether a surprise. Only one of the letters received as yet objects to the decision, and that does so by the assumption that the statute requires a qualified master. This, how¬ ever, is precisely the question that was at issue. The House of Lords has decided that the statute does not require a qualified master except when the master is an individual, and in the case of an associa¬ tion constituting the master, it accepts the qualifica¬ tion of the servant by whom the business is actually conducted as sufficient reason for regarding such a master as being exempt from the provisions of the Pharmacy Act as to keeping open shop, examination and registration. THE CONFERENCE TESTIMONIAL TO PROFESSOR ATTFIELD. At a meeting of the Executive Committee, held on the 16th instant, it was resolved to close the subscription list at the meeting of the Conference at Swansea in August. The Committee decided that the testimonial should take the form of a collection of works in general literature for the Professor’s library, accompanied by a suitable address. The address will be presented at Swansea by the Chair¬ man of the Committee. Members who have not yet paid their subscriptions and intending sub¬ scribers will oblige by remitting the amounfwithout delay to Mr. M. Carteighe, 180, New Bond Street, W., the Hon. Secretary and Treasurer. July 31, 1880.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 83 IJarliimnntaxn tmtr Ibto ^Iroceetirirgs, The Pharmaceutical Society op Great Britain v. The London and Provincial Supply Association. The argument in this case was resumed on Thursday, July 22, 1880. Mr. Benjamin : When your lordships adjourned I was going into an examination of the two Acts — not going to the authorities, but looking to the Acts themselves for their meaning. Your lordships observe that the Phar¬ macy Act of 1 852 was an Act for regulating the quali¬ fications of pharmaceutical chemists. It is confined entirely to that, and it confirms the charter, provides for the formation of a Council, the manner of voting, and the registration of members, and for examinations of different kinds. Now between that Act and the Act of 1868 public alarm was created by several cases of poison¬ ing by mistakes in chemists’ and apothecaries’ shops, and the Act of 1868 was passed on its title for two distinct purposes. It is an Act to regulate the sale of poisons, and also to amend the Pharmacy Act of 1852. There¬ fore, you must expect to find in this Act of 1868 a series of sections, upon which great reliance has been placed by my learned friends on the other side, which referred to the Pharmacy Act of 1852, which Act was confined to regulating the qualification of pharmaceutical chemists ; consequently there are ten or twelve sections, I do not know how many exactly, which, according to the title of the Act, are directed to a further Act for regulating the qualifications of chemists. But the Act, by its very title, put at the head of its purpose, is an Act to regulate the sale of poisons, and no Act for regulating the sale of poisons had ever existed before. I say, therefore, with all confidence, that I can ask your lordships to say that you would expect to find in this Act new legislation on the subject of the sale of poisons and legislation directed to the amendment of the former Act ; and it is no objection to the proper construction of those sections which regulate the sale of poisons that there are a number of other sections which have nothing to do with that, but which are applied, and intended to apply, solely to the alteration and amendment of the pre-existing law. The Lord Chancellor : You must observe that the preamble speaks of two objects : the first relates to poisons and the other to all persons known as chemists and druggists, who have to pass an examination, if not already engaged in business, when provision is made. Mr. Benjamin : I am much obliged to your lordship. The Lord Chancellor: And any construction of the word “persons” which is applicable to poisons would primd facie be applicable to the other purpose also. Mr. Benjamin: Yes, my lord, it would be applicable to the other also, but not exclusively. That is what I submit to your lordships. When the Act of 1862 was passed, the thing which is put at the head and front of the Act is to regulate the sale of poisons. The preamble says that it is expedient for the safety of the public that persons keeping open shop for retailing, dispensing and compounding poisons should have a proper qualification. Then the Act begins, and in its 1st section carrying out the primary object begins by a prohibition of the sale of poisons. The Lord Chancellor: Carrying out both objects, because it goes on to say, “ or to assume or use the title of chemist and druggist, or chemist or druggist.” Mr. Benjamin: Yes, my lord, but the very first sen¬ tence is as to the sale of poisons. Lord Blackburn : To take the preamble alone it seems as if “ person ” there meant a natural person, because it says : “ Whereas it is expedient for the safety of the public that persons keeping open shop for the purpose of retailing and dispensing poisons,” that is one thing, and that “ persons known as chemists and druggists,” that is another, should possess a competent practical knowledge of their business. To that end, from and after a par¬ ticular date, every person shall be examined. You would hardly say that a corporation or person artificial could possess a competent practical knowledge of che¬ mistry. It certainly could not so duly examined. Mr. Benjamin: Quite so, my lord. Our argument from that is for what it is worth — and it seems to us conclusive — that inasmuch as a corporation cannot possess these qualifications, it is a person that cannot sell poison. The Lord Chancellor : What I wish you to notice is that you cannot stop short of contending, prospectively at all events, that the Act would prevent any company from carrying on the business of chemists and druggists, not merely from selling poisons, but from carrying on business as chemists and druggists. Mr. Benjamin : Prospectively, my lord, yes ; that was the intention of the Act I quite admit. The Lord Chancellor : If you established that - Mr. Benjamin : Yes, my lord. By amending the Pharmacy Act, it provides for such a registration of persons carrying on the trade as shall prevent anyone carrying on the trade who has not passed the proper examination. Then you have the 1st section, “ From and after the 31st day of December, 1868, it shall be un¬ lawful for any person to sell or keep open shop for retailing dispensing, or compounding poisons, or to assume or use the title ‘ chemist and druggist,’ or chemist or druggist, or pharmacist, or dispensing chemist or druggist in any part of Great Britain, unless such person shall be a pharmaceutical chemist, or a chemist and druggist within the meaning of this Act, and be registered under this Act, and conform to such regulations as to the keeping, dispensing, and selling of such poisons as may from time to time be prescribed by the Pharmaceutical Society with the consent of the Privy Council.” There then, my lords, taking that section alone, is it not plain that this Act was intended for the safety of the public, not only as regards the sale of poisons, but as regards the practice of an apothecary, that he shall be a person who has been examined and registered? Observe, my lords, “it shall be unlawful for any person to sell or keepopen shop for retail.” Those words “to sell ” would be superfluous, because it would be quite sufficient to prohibit “ keeping open shop for retailing, dispensing, or compounding poisons,” if it were not that poisons are known to be habitually bought by private persons, by persons who are practising as apothecaries or druggists, and in the fen country, as I am informed, and I am told it appears by the blue books, the whole population were in the habit of being supplied with such drugs as opium and compounds of opium by travelling pedlars. They were persons who did not act as apothecaries and druggists ; but they were private individuals who would hawk about the country poisonous drugs, and the inten¬ tion, therefore, of the Act was not simply to aim at persons who keep a shop, but to aim at persons who went about the country not practising as pharmaceutical chemists or druggists, but simply as retailers and pedlars of poisonous drugs ; therefore it was made an offence not only to keep open shop for the sale to the public, bat for anybody to sell. In that way the public were protected against the sale of poisons ; and the second purpose of the Act to alter and amend the Pharmacy Act by requiring a proper examination and registration was also observed. Then, my lords, the 2nd section simply gives a list of poisons by reference to the schedule. Lord Blackburn : It would be important to show that the mischief is not the less affected by a corporation keeping open shop if they have a qualified assistant. You may say that a corporation is brought within the words ; but what harm does it do if the body corporate, such as Apothecaries’ Hall, continues to sell by qualified assistants ? Mr. Benjamin: My lord, that question about Apothe¬ caries’ Hall has been used at every stage of the argument 84 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [July 31, 1886. in this case, and I have only to answer that the Apothe¬ caries’ Hall is a private partnership. It is not a company, it is not a corporation. We have the deed of partner¬ ship in Court, if it is necessary to look at it. Lord Blackburn : It may be ; but whether it was a cor¬ poration or not I do not know. I believe there were some bodies corporate engaged in this business ; but supposing there were not, there may have been such, and how would the fact that the shop was kept by a corporation in the slightest degree bring the case within the mischief if the people who actually dealt with the poisons were qualified ? i Mr. Benjamin : If a corporation is not under the Act, then a corporation is not obliged to have a qualified as¬ sistant. Lord Blackburn: But if they do sell, I should say that a corporation, if it sells by an unqualified assistant, certainly the unqualified assistant would be under the Act. Mr. Benjamin : The question is whether the corporation can escape the provisions of the Act. If they are not under the Act there is a complete absence of any protec¬ tion such as the Act requires in keeping a shop for the sale of poisons. The Lord Chancellor : Let me ask you this, Mr. Benja¬ min. In what manner do you suppose the Apothecaries’ Company, which certainly did some time ago and prob¬ ably does so still, carry on the business of chemists and druggists and deal in medicines and drugs, dispensing them and so on, are saved from the Act according to your construction ? Mr. Benjamin : They are a private partnership com- ; posed exclusively of apothecaries. The Lord Chancellor : No, they are a corporation — at least I fully believe they are. Mr. Benjamin : We have the deed here, my lord, dated in 1822, and it is a private partnership. The Lord Chancellor : The Apothecaries’ Company ? Mr. Benjamin: It is not a company. Lord Blackburn : In 1822, a body who had got more than seven persons, who tried to carry on business, would have found themselves in an enormous difficulty. Are you sure they are not a corporation ? Mr. Benjamin : Here is the deed. The Lord Chancellor : Those who carry on business at Apothecaries’ Hall. Mr. Benjamin : They were a private partnership — those who sell. Here is the deed, and by the deed nobody but a qualified apothecary can be a member of that body. Lord Blackburn: What I should like to know is, whether they are not incorporated besides1; because in 1822, a large body would have found enormous difficulty in carrying on business. Are you quite sure they are not a corporation ? Mr. Benjamin : I am so instructed, my lord, and the deed is brought here. I am told there is no such thing. Mr. Wills : The charter is cited in the Act 55 Geo. III. establishing them as a corporation by the name of “The Master, Warden and Society of the Art and Mystery of Apothecaries.” That is the charter of 15 James I. The Lord Chancellor: It is so by an old Act of Parlia¬ ment in. my hand. It is clear they are treated as a cor¬ poration there. They are a very old corporation. One of the medical Acts refers to them. I rather think, I am not sure, that they are as old as the earliest medical Act, which if I am not mistaken is as old as Henry VIII. Mr. Benjamin : Your lordship is quite correct in that; bat it does not derogate from what I said that the com¬ pany consists of those who keep a shop for the sale of medicines, and a private partnership composed of mem¬ bers of that corporation is a company who by a private deed amongst themselves carry on the business; the corporate company does not carry on the business, but there is a sub-partnership, so to speak, composed of mem¬ bers of the corporate company whose deed is before me. Lord Blackburn : Is it registered under the Joint Stock Companies Act ? Mr. Benjamin: No, my lord. Lord Blackburn : I do not understand how it has con¬ trived to carry on business. It seems very strange. Mr. Benjamin: Here it is, my lord. If it is necessary, and if your lordships desire it I will read what the pro¬ visions are. The Lord Chancellor: Strictly speaking we have no right to attend to any such deed, which, I presume; is not in evidence. Mr. Benjamin : No, my lord, it is not. The Lord Chancellor : But I do not suppose there will be any objection on the other side to its being read by way of illustration of your argument. What is the date of it ? Mr. Benjamin : 1822, my lord. It is an “ Indenture made on the 9th November in the 3rd year of George IV. in the year of our Lord 18'22, between the Masters, Wardens and Society of the Art and Mystery of Apothe¬ caries ” — that is the incorporated company — “ of the first part, the several persons whose names are set forth in the column marked A at the foot of the second part, the other persons in column B of the third part, the several persons mentioned in column C, being members of the company in the new partnership formed by these presents, of the fourth part, and the several persons whose names are subscribed in the column marked D, being members only of the second class in the new partnership formed by these presents, of the fifth part. Whereas the persons who are or who are intended to be parties hereto of the second part have for many years past carried on a trade or business in co-partnership in drugs and medicines in the name of the said Master, Wardens and Society with a certain capital stock called the Navy Stock, upon certain terms and regulations.” Lord Blackburn : That would seem as if the trade was carried on in the name of the corporation. That removes the difficulty which I thought of. The corporation would bring an action for a contract made on their behalf, and nobody could set up a defence. The Lord Chancellor: One suspects from what you have already read, that the nature of the deed is this, that the corporation carries on the business ; but inasmuch as it is desirable that the persons who are practically em¬ ployed in it, or contribute money with which it is carried on, should have certain rights inter se distinct from those of the corporation, the deed is intended to provide for and regulate that. Mr. Benjamin: No, my lord, it is not that. It is a new partnership. I have just read one sentence in the preamble. “And whereas the several persons who are or are intended to be parties hereto of the third part have for some time past carried on in co-partnership in the name of the said Master, Wardens,” and so on, “the trade in medicines, and making and vending chemical medicines, with a capital or stock commonly called the Laboratory Stock. This indenture witnesseth and it is hereby agreed that the said co-partnership, or trade, or business as aforesaid, exercised or carried on by the parties of the second part, shall be determined and dissolved as on the 31st December in this year, and that all the estate, property, stock in trade and so forth, shall by the com¬ mittee for managing the said co-partnership be sold and dis¬ posed of at valuation by auditors in the usual manner.” Then the co-partnership is formed and the operative part is this: “First, that the persons the parties hereto of the fourth and fifth part respectively shall and will as on the 1st day of January, 1823, carry on and exercise in co¬ partnership the same trades or businesses as now are or hitherto have been carried on.” The Lord Chancellor : Just read the introductory words of t hat sentence once more. Mr. Benjamin: “The parties hereto of the fourth and fifth part shall and will as and from the 1st January, 1823, carry on and exercise in co-partnership the same trades or businesses as are now or have been earned on by the persons interested in the capital or stock called the July 31, 1380.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 85 Navy Stock, and the persons interested in the capital and stock called the Laboratory Stock. The said new part¬ nership shall be carried on in the name of the Miaster, Wardens and Society of the Art and Mystery of Apothe¬ caries of the City of London, bnt for the benefit of the members or proprietors of such new partnership, and the said Master, Wardens and Society do consent.” Lord Blackburn : You see the business was carried on, as I thought was absolutely necessary from the fact that it could not otherwise have been carried on, by the cor¬ poration. The Lord Chancellor: If it is carried on in the name of the corporation, and if it is illegal for the corporation to keep an open shop, it is at least a very serious question whether they were not keeping an open shop under that deed. Mr. Benjamin : That may be true ; but it would also be true that the rights of this corporation and those who may carry it on have been saved by the statute. The Lord Chancellor : That I have been looking at, and it was purely with that view that I refer to that case. It seems to me, however, difficult so to argue because the only rights saved are the rights of persons registered under the Act, and by the 5th clause with, respect to persons at that time carrying on business, it is necessary that they should claim to be registered by notice in writing, “ signed by him, as the expression is, and how can the corporation sign notice in writing ? Mr. Benjamin: One word, my lord, a little further. I wish your lordship to be in possession of what this deed is. The 53rd clause is, that no person shall be qualified to be a proprietor of the first class, that is, a partner, unless he shall be a liveryman of the said society ; and nobody shall be qualified to be a proprietor of the second class unless he be an apothecary in actual practice for his own benefit and on his own account. The Lord Chancellor : I do not perceive that either of those expressions brings him within this Act of 1868. Mr. Benjamin: The 57th. Lord Watson : Schedules C and D, referred to in sec¬ tion 5, would seem to apply exclusively to individuals. Mr. Benjamin : What I did intend to argue was that it is perfectly immaterial to us whether the Apothecaries Company was or was not within the Act. The Lord Chancellor : It may be immaterial to you, but it may not be immaterial entirely for the considera¬ tion of the question before us ; if this company, which has existed since the time of Henry VIII., which is by law entrusted with the regulation of the sale in general, would be an illegal company as to the business of che¬ mists and druggists by this Act. That is not a very im¬ material consideration. ^ ... Mr. Benjamin : I will go on with the consideration of the Act, my lord, if you please, leaving out this Apothe¬ caries’ Company for a moment, and supposing the Court to be in ignorance of its existence. The Lord Chancellor : It may not be in ignorance of its existence, because of the Acts of Parliament which relate to it, which are public Acts. Whether it may be in ignorance of its carrying on business as Apothecaries Hall is another question. Mr. Benjamin: Or keeping a shop for the sale of poisons to the publie. It may be it is not authorized to keep open shop for the sale of poisons to the public. I do not know how that may be. I have not investigated that point. But what I am looking at is the face of this Act, and seeing wbat the Act says. I have called your attention only to the 1st section, and the section is : “ Nobody shall sell or keep open shop for the sale of poisons, except he be a druggist registered within the meaning of this Act and registered under the Act. Lord Blackburn : I am not sure but you have slightly altered the words and made them rather more favourable. It does not say nobody shall sell, but it shall be unlawful for any person to sell. If it had said nobody shall sell, you may very well say that means that a corporation shall not do it, but if it simply says, “it shall be unlawful for any person to sell or keep open shop unless,” so and so, it does not follow if “person” is by the context confined to natural persons that it refers to a corporation. I mean you should stick to the very words. Mr. Benjamin: Well, my lord, in the course of argu¬ ment one is not always reading the particular passage, but giving one’s idea of the meaning of it. My idea of the meaning of the first section, and one which I hope to win your lordships’ approval of, is that nobody shall have an open shop for the sale of poisons, except a duly registered chemist. That is our interpretation of the 1st section, and we say that it includes corporations. Although it is said that it may be unlawful for any person to sell unless he be registered under this Act. If a corporation cannot be registered under this Act a corporation is a person, and it is unlawful for the corporation. It is unlawful for any person. My friend says that does not mean it shall be unlawful for a corporation. It is on them to show that that language does not apply to a cor¬ poration. The language is, it shall be unlawful for any person unless he is registered under this Act. A corporation cannot be registered under the Act. Of course, those portions of the Act which amend the former Pharmacy Act do not permit of the registration of a cor¬ poration. We infer from that and we say the fair meaning of that is this, inasmuch as a corporation cannot be a re¬ gistered chemist under the provisions of the Act, and inasmuch as it is unlawful for any person but a registered chemist to keep open a shop to sell poisons, a corporation cannot ; it is in direct violation of the Acts, and there is nothing in the Act which confines it to an individual. The Lord Chancellor: According to your argument, although a partnership consisting of six or seven registered persons qualified under the Act would be perfectly legal, yet if it consisted of seven or more persons who were registered under the Joint Stock Companies Act, it would be illegal, although as I have said every member must be duly qualified. Mr. Benjamin : Yes, my lord, that would be the result. The Lord Chancellor: In other words the chemists and druggists are excluded from the benefits of the law of limited liability. Mr. Benjamin : For the carrying on business of chemists and druggists, yes, my lord. That is to say not excluded from the benefit, but they must not deal in poisons ; that is all. The Lord Chancellor: I cannot at present see that there is any possibility of us limiting the operation of the Act to the dealing in poisons. It goes on to the assuming or using the title of chemists and druggists and so on, and as it seems to me whatever construction is right as to poisons, is right as to carrying on the business of chemists and druggists. Mr. Benjamin : Now, my lord, the 2nd section of the Act gives us a schedule, in which the poisons are enumerated within the meaning of this Act. “The Council of the Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain (hereinafter referred to as the Pharmaceutical Society) may from time to time, by resolution, declare that any article in such resolution named ought to be deemed a poison within the meaning of this Act, and thereupon the said Society shall submit the same for the approval of the Privy Council, and if such approval shall be given, then such resolution and approval shall be adver¬ tized in the London Gazette , and on the expiration of one month from such advertisement, the article named in such resolution shall be deemed to be a poison.” Then the 3rd is, “ Chemists and druggists within the meaning of this Act shall consist of all persons who, at any time before the passing of this Act, have carried on, in Great Britain, the business of a chemist and druggist.” We say that includes a corporation, and that the Apothecaries’ Company, to which your lordship has referred, is there saved. The Lord Chancellor: No, that is not a saving 86 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [July 81, 1880. clause, that is a definition clause, the saving clause is later. Mr. Benjamin : This 3rd section saves them ; it says “ chemists and druggists shall consist of persons who before the passing of this Act carried on the business of chemists and druggists.” The Lord Chancellor : And of certain other persons. That by itself is not a saving, but a definition clause. The saving clause is found elsewhere. Mr. Benjamin : What is the effect of this, my lord ? Is it not that chemists and druggists within the meaning of this Act include all persons who heretofore have carried on the business of chemists and druggists ? The Lord Chancellor : Certainly, whatever be the meaning of the word “ druggist.” Mr. Benjamin: Yes, my lord. Lord Watson: But they cannot dispense poisons until they comply with the provisions of section 5, namely, registration. Lord Blackburn : A corporation can hardly be regis¬ tered under section 5. The Lord Chancellor : Certainly not, I should think. Mr. Benjamin: “ And also of all such persons as may be duly registered under this Act.” “ The new register shall comprise all persons who have heretofore carried on business and all who are registered under this Act.” Lord Blackburn : I think you will find, if you look at section 5, there is some difficulty in construing that in that way. Lord Watson : How can a company declare in the terms of schedule D that it is a duly qualified medical practitioner, residing at a particular place ? Mr. Benjamin : It cannot, my lord, because it is not a medical practitioner, — Apothecaries’ Hall is not a medical practitioner at all, and of course it could not. Section 4 is that assistants are to be registered. That plainly is an amendment to the previous Act. Then section 5 : “ The persons who at the time of the passing of this Act shall have been duly admitted pharmaceutical chemists or shall be chemists and druggists within the meaning of the Act shall be entitled to be registered.” Lord Watson: Section 4 is an amendment to section 6 of the previous Act. Lord Blackburn : Section 5 says, “ Who are entitled to be registered.” Mr. Benjamin : “ Provided, however, as regards any such chemist and druggist, that his claim to be registered must be by notice in writing, signed by him and given to the Registrar with certificates according to the schedules C and D to this Act ; and provided also, that for any such registration of a chemist and druggist, unless it be duly claimed by him on or before the 31st day of December, 1868.” Lord Blackburn : Stopping there for a moment, how could a corporation become registered under section 5 ? A corporation cannot possibly send “ a notice in writing signed by him ; ” it is a straining of the words to say so. Mr. Benjamin : Let us see schedule C. It is a declaration of a person in business as a chemist and druggist before the Pharmacy Act of 1868, to the Registrar of the Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain. “I - hereby declare that I was in business as a chemist and druggist in the keeping open shop for the compounding of the prescriptions of duly qualified medical practitioners at - , in the county of - , on or before the - day of - The Lord Chancellor : And signed his name. Lord Blackburn : Who is to sign that ? How is the corporation to sign that ? Mr. Benjamin: A corporation signs by its seal. Lord Blackburn: Is not that doing violence to the language? Which of the two is the greatest straining of the words, to say that “ person ” means a natural person, or to say that signing means sealing? Mr. Benjamin : Whichever of those constructions may be preferred, my lord, we have not yet come to the sec¬ tion which covers the present case. It may be conceded for the purpose of the argument that we are taking our contention too high in saying that in section 3 the word “ person ” includes a corporation. Let us for a moment admit that. Then, of course, that being inapplicable, it is a continuation of the former Act in relation to Apothe¬ caries’ Hall. Then the 6th is undoubtedly an amend¬ ment of the former Act about examinations. Seven is un¬ doubtedly an amendment of the former Act. It is about the examination and registering. Eight is an amendment of the former Act. Nine is an amendment of the former Act. Ten is an amendment of the former Act. Eleven is an amendment of the former Act. Twelve is an amendment of the former Act. Thirteen is an amend¬ ment of the former Act. Fourteen is an amendment of the former Act ; the whole of those sections being ap¬ plicable to registration. The Lord Chancellor : And every one of them, as far as one can see, only applicable to the registration of natural persons. Mr. Benjamin : Quite so, my lord, because the former Act was only applicable to natural persons. The Act of 1852 is clearly only for natural persons, and the main clauses of this Act are solely for natural persons. I submit that we must keep in view all the time that there are two classes of provisions in the Act of 1868, and stated to be so ; one having reference to the regis¬ tration and the other having reference to the sale of poisons, the section relative to the sale of poisons being entirely new, the other sections being simply amendments of the former Act. The former Act provided only for regulating the qualification of pharmaceutical chemists, that was entirely a personal Act and the sections which amend it are personal sections. The Lord Chancellor : Fourteen is the clause of penal¬ ties, which it would be very difficult ts apply to a corpo¬ ration. Mr. Benjamin : I say that, my lord, section 14 is an amendment of a former Act. The Lord Chancellor : It goes beyond that j it says : “Any person who shall wilfully procure or attempt to pro¬ cure himself to be registered under the Pharmacy Act, or under this Act, by making or producing or causing to be made or produced any false or fraudulent representation or declaration,” which would plainly include the declara¬ tion by persons then carrying on business as chemists and druggists under the 5th section, “shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and shall on conviction be sentenced to imprisonment for any term not exceeding twelve months.” Lord Blackburn : It does not relate to the former Act only, but to this Act. It is manifest that a person making a false declaration under the 5th section in order to get himself registered as a person who before the passing of the Act was carrying on in Great Britain a business of a chemist and druggist would be liable to imprisonment under that clause. Therefore it is clear that corporations cannot be contemplated. Mr. Benjamin : It seems to me, my lord, with all sub¬ mission, that it is really in force of what I am endeavour¬ ing to maintain rather than in derogation of it. The Lord Chancellor : If you say that corporations are prohibited, of course it is quite consistent that these clam es do not contemplate or provide for them. Mr. Benjamin : What I mean is this, my lord, that this clause, like the other clauses having reference to the registration of pharmaceutical chemists, is a code of legislations for persons — that I quite admit. Lord Blackburn : Of course it is quite competent to argue that if in section 1 it was meant to enlarge the sense of the word to include persons natural and artificial that in the thirteen following sections “person” is used in a restrict sense. Mr. Benjamin : That is for registration. Lord Blackburn: But when you find, without any obvious reason, the word person is used in one sense in section 1, and is used in a different sense in thirteen follow- July 31, 1880.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 87 ing sections, primd facie one would say if “ person ” is used in one sense to begin with, it would mean the same throughout. Mr. Benjamin : Unless the Act had said it had two objects, and the Act says it has two objects. Lord Blackburn: If the Act had anywhere said, as Mr. Justice Mellor seems to have thought in his judg¬ ment, that to encourage apothecaries to qualify them¬ selves they should have a monopoly of the profits arising from vending poisonous drugs — if that object were there, I should say there was a great deal of force in your argument; but I don’t find that. Mr. Benjamin : My lord, so far as the question of monopoly is concerned, monopoly of course is a difficult word, it creates prejudice ; but your lordship is perfectly justified in making use of it. Lord Blackburn : Take a different word. What I wish to express is, the sole right of vending, or the profits arising from the sole right of vending— if there was any¬ thing in this Act — a recital so clear, or a statement that for the purpose of inducing men to undergo education and become able chemists and understand their business, we will give such people as become pharmaceutical chemists the sole right of obtaining profits from vending poisonous drugs. A recital or any enactment to that effect would go a great way towards showing that you are right. But that is what I cannot find. Mr. Benjamin : My lord, I think that the Act specifies a distinct purpose, a much higher purpose, than that. It specifies a desire to protect the public against being poisoned, and that is quite as high an object and a separate object. Lord Blackburn : Only that the legislation is not necessarily connected with that chief idea. That is what made me ask some time ago if you could point out to me — the object being to save the public from being poisoned by a duly qualified man and in a shop regulated to sell poisons — why the public should be in more danger because, instead of keeping the profits for his own use, he handed them over to a corporation. Mr. Benjamin: Because it is admitted under the language of the Act. I suppose nobody questions that, that no private individual could do what this company has done and not be within the Act. Lord Blackburn : But what I want to know is this. One object of the Act was to say that no one but a qualified person shall superintend the selling of poisons, and it forbids to keep open shop. That is because a person may keep open shop and have a duly qualified assistant, but then the master may perhaps interfere, and therefore, to simplify proof, if he is an unqualified person who keeps the open shop he is within the Act ; but a cor¬ poration cannot control its qualified manager. Mr. Benjamin : And therefore it cannot carry out the purpose of the Act. Lord Blackburn : No ; therefore its keeping an open shop does not produce the mischief the Act is intended to prevent. Mr. Benjamin: A corporation with an open shop for the sale of drugs has assistants, but it sends abroad for things, cheap, if you please, drugs and medicines of dif¬ ferent kinds. The corporation itself is not qualified to judge of what it is buying. The man who is in the shop, who is a duly qualified assistant, has nothing to-do with the purchase. It is perfectly well known that it is a matter of extreme importance that the quality of drugs, poisons or whatever they are, that are kept in the shop should be pure, and it is also known that in very many drugs there are certain amounts of impurity which a qualified person would know and would be able to appreciate, and so whether it was too much or too little to make the drugs of a particular strength. Lord Watson : That is carrying it very far. Lord Blackburn: That is an excellent argument for extending the Act to the wholesale purchase and sale of drugs. Lord Watson : Is not a company within the Adultera¬ tion Act ? Mr. Benjamin : I was answering an observation of my Lord Blackburn, whether or not there was any necessity for the person who kept the shop to be qualified, for a proprietor to be qualified. The Act says the proprietor must be qualified. I am asked whether there is any, and what danger to be apprehended if the proprietor be a company ? I answer yes, because the proprietor being a company, a company may get a stock of the most impure description. The Lord Chancellor : So may persons properly quali¬ fied under the Act. There is not a word in the Act to provide against their making purchases by agents, of any sort or kind, abroad, whether qualified or unqualified. There is nothing in the Act to require the quality of drugs which they bring into stock to be tested ; nothing to deal with the subject of adulteration. Mr. Benjamin: Now, the Act having said that the person who keeps the shop must be duly qualified, there must be a motive for the requirements. The Lord Chancellor : It does not follow he must be a chemist. Mr. Benjamin: Yes, my lord, the Act requires the proprietor to be a qualified chemist, who keeps open the shop ; the proprietor must be a qualified chemist. The Lord Chancellor: What I meant was this. I do not suppose that the qualification for a registered chemist of that sort requires that he should analyse all his drugs. Mr. Benjamin: No, my lord; but I am asked for the motive for the lawgiver saying, we are not satisfied that the assistant shall be qualified, we want the proprietor to be qualified. And it is suggested what motive is there for that. I answer, the motive is that a duly qualified pro¬ prietor furnishes his shop with the drugs and poisons which are to be sold, and it may be that the Legislature thought that it was necessary that the proprietor should be duly qualified as additional security for the quality of the drugs and poisons sold in his shop. Lord Watson : Should it not be, as was suggested by one of their lordships in the Court below, that it is from apprehension that the principal may interfere with his assistant and sell instead of him. Mr. Benjamin: For that also, in which case as the assistant is under his orders, the qualified servant is under the orders of the unqualified master. That again, as suggested by the judges below, may be a reason for requiring the master to be qualified. Lord Blackburn : But how does that apply to a cor¬ poration, if the corporation, as in this case, has a qualified managing director ? The body corporate cannot interfere. Mr. Benjamin : I do not quite understand. This man here, who keeps the little portion of the establishment called the druggist’s shop, is a paid servant. Lord Blackburn : He may be a paid servant, I do not recollect exactly how it stands now ; but, however, that would be more as to this particular case. The Lord Chancellor : It is obvious, Mr. Benjamin, you may have a man who was qualified carrying on busi¬ ness, and he might have as the general manager of his business a person who was not qualified, but as for the particular purpose of vending these drugs, a person who was qualified. There would be no illegality in the general manager being an unqualified person under those circumstances. Mr. Benjamin : The proprietor must be qualified. The Lord Chancellor : I am putting the case of a qualified proprietor selling by a qualified assistant, but leaving the general management of his business, as a tradesman, in the hands of such a person as the gentleman whose name I forget — Mr. Benjamin : Longmore ? The Lord Chancellor : No, not Longmore. Mr. Benjamin : Mackness? 88 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [July 31, 1880. The Lord Chancellor : Yes, Mackness. He, I under¬ stand, is not qualified to sell drugs. Mr. Benjamin : No, my lord, he is substantially the proprietor. The Lord Chancellor: The company is the proprietor. It is undeniable that it is a company; Mackness is the general manager, and Longmore is the person to whom this department is confided. The position of Mackness will not make it illegal, or would not have made it illegal, supposing that instead of a company the business had belonged to a qualified person under the Act. Mr. Benjamin : "Well, my lord, we come back to this, here is a business in which there is no qualified proprietor. Lord Blackburn : If you could establish your first point, that “person” necessarily includes a corporation — it cer¬ tainly may — and consequently a corporation is forbidden, there is no more to be said. Lord Watson : Your argument leads to this, that under section 1, corporations and individuals are included in the word “person” for two different purposes, one is intended for the purpose of being subjected to the regula¬ tions of the statute, the other is introduced for the purpose of being excluded from the sale of poisons altogether. Mr. Benjamin: Well, my lord, I do not see why that should not be. But now the 15th section comes in, which is important. Lord Watson : That seems to me to be it. Mr. Benjamin : It is a distinct offence committed under the Act: “Erom and after the 31st day of December, 1 868, any person who shall sell, or keep an open shop for the retailing, dispensing or compounding poisons, or who shall take, use, or exhibit the name or title of chemist and druggist, or chemist or druggist, not being a duly registered pharmaceutical chemist or chemist and druggist, or who shall take, use, or exhibit the name or title of pharmaceu¬ tical chemist, pharmaceutist, or pharmacist, not being a pharmaceutical chemist, or shall fail to conform with any regulation as to keeping or selling of poisons, made in pur¬ suance of this Act, or who shall compound any medicines of the British Pharmacopoeia, except according to the formularies of the Pharmacopoeia, shall, for every such offence, be liable to pay a penalty or sum of £5, and the same may be sued for, recovered, and dealt with in the manner provided by the Pharmacy Act for the recovery of penalties under that Act ; but nothing in this Act con¬ tained shall prevent any person from being liable to any other penalty, damages or punishment, to which he would have been subject if this Act had not passed.” Now, you have here this, any person who shall after the 31st day of December, sell, or keep open shop for the retailing of poisons commits an offence. Surely, my lord, that is as broad language as one ever finds in an Act of Parliament. The Lord Chancellor : But still the question is the meaning of the word “ person ” as used in this Act. Mr. Benjamin : Is there any reason for excluding the corporation from committing that offence ? Lord Blackburn : There is a strong reason, as it seems to me, in the very 15th section, which puts penalties on persons. They say the word “ person ” is limited to the same extent as in section 1. Once establish that in section 1 a corporation is included, and the other would follow. * Lord Watson : It is not presumable that the Legislature intended to include under the penalties section anyone except those referred to in the former section. I think the question of the 15th section, unless you can point out any difference in the language, is precisely the same as the question which arises on the first. Mr. Benjamin : No doubt, sections 1 and 15 are to be read together. The Lord Chancellor : It is very important to observe that this section and others clearly struck at assistants, as well as the principal to whom the business belongs. The word “sell” and the word “compound” in that clause clearly relate to the person actually selling and actually compounding. Therefore, except for those words on which you rely, “keeping open shop,” there is nothing in the section in which the objects would not be fully met, although a corporation carrying on business were not within it ; and in the 17th section that is made still clearer by the words which say, that for the purpose of this section, a person on whose behalf a sale is made shall be deemed to be the seller, and, by necessary impli¬ cation one would say, showing that is not to be the uni¬ versal rule throughout the Act. Mr. Benjamin : That is the argument used against iu. I did endeavour to answer that argument by showing that there were certain peculiar provisions in section 17 which might have given rise to doubt. It is a peculiar section, and I will come to that in a moment. I will first pass over section 16 and arrive at section 17 at once. Section 16 is the saving clause which enacts that “ nothing hereinbefore contained shall extend to or interfere with the business of any legally qualified apothecary, or of any member of the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons of Great Britain, nor with the making or dealing in patent medicines, nor with the business of wholesale dealers in supplying poisons in the ordinary course of wholesale dealing.” Then comes this, upon the decease of anyone actually in business it shall be lawful for his executors to continue the business if and so long only as such business shall be conducted by a duly qualified assistant. Here we have the case, and the one case only, in which a business can be conducted where the proprietor is not duly qualified. The Lord Chancellor : That, also, I think you may assume contains a very strong intention that the word “ sale ” and the word “ compound,” and so on, are ap¬ plicable to a person actually making the sale, although not the owner of the business : otherwise, under that section, everything would be thrown at large and poisons might be sold by persons who were carrying on the business. The Legislature provided against that by saying that the business may be carried on by a duly qualified assistant. Mr. Benjamin : But further, I call that in aid of my general proposition, that there is a single case provided by the Act in which the business can be carried on by a duly qualified assistant without a duly qualified pro¬ prietor. This is a case in which there may be no duly qualified proprietor, and yet the party does not come under the censure of the Act, if in this stringent emer¬ gency, temporary in its nature, there be a duly qualified assistant. Lord Watson : That is so far in favour of your argu¬ ment that this clause does not appear to deal with keeping open shop. It deals exclusively with actual selling. Mr. Benjamin : Yes, my lord. Lord Watson: I think the Arsenic Act of 1851 has at the end a clause which deals only with the seller. Lord Blackburn: I think section 16, which authorizes an executor to continue such business, must mean to con¬ tinue it as before, that is to keep open shop. Mr. Benjamin: Quite so. I quite agree that is the meaning of that, and I call in aid the fact that the Legislature had in view circumstances where it might be proper to excuse an absence of a qualified proprietor, and there is but one case in which carrying on the business' without a qualified proprietor is made lawful by the Act. Lord Blackburn: This section 16, if you are right in your argument that a corporation is within it, does not conflict with it, it is quite clear. Mr. Benjamin : With regard to what the Lord Chancel¬ lor said about section 17, 1 endeavoured before to point out the necessity of that particular clause in this section only. When you read the section itself you will see why it was necessary particularly to introduce that clause into it ; “ that it shall be unlawful to sell any poison, either by wholesale or retail, unless the box, bottle, vessel, wrapper or cover in which such poison is contained be distinctly July 31, 1880.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 89 labelled with the name of the article and the word poison, and with the name and address of the seller of the poi¬ son.” Now, clearly, it might have been contended that the person who sold was the assistant — that it was the assistant — that it was the assistant who was selling without having the box, bottle, vessel, wrapper or cover with the proper label, and with the proper address ; and that inasmuch as this is a penal section that the pro¬ prietor could not be held responsible for his assistant failing to wrap up the box, bottle, or vessel with the proper paper, and putting on the proper address. Lord Watson: This is a much wider enactment, it comprises wholesale dealing as well. Mr. Benjamin: Yes, my lord; therefore taking that alone it became necessary to say inasmuch as this is now made a penal offence, whom do we mean by the seller who fails to wrap the box, or wrap the bottle, and put the proper label upon it ? Well then, what we mean, says the Legislature, is that what is mentioned in this section as the seller shall not be the assistant who wraps up, but shall be the proprietor. The Lord Chancellor : That is exactly what I pointed out. The 15th section is a penal section also. There is also a provision as to the seller in that section. Lord Watson : This section applies to wholesale deal¬ ings, and would certainly include a corporation also, which you would not say is illegal. Mr. Benjamin : Yes, my lord, that is so. Then this is a criminal act. It is not a penalty of £5 for an offence to be sued for, but “ any person selling poisons otherwise than as herein provided, shall, upon summary conviction, be liable to a penalty not exceeding £5 for the first offence, and for the purpose of this section the person on whose behalf any sale is made shall be deemed to be the seller.” Lord Watson : It is difficult to maintain that the word “ person in what you have just read does not include corporation. The Lord Chancellor : Because the previous part of the section begins differently, it says, “it shall be unlawful.” Mr. Benjamin : This is a regulation for the sale of poisons. It shall be unlawful to do this thing, and if it is done it is the proprietor who is liable. Now, supposing in this very case this registered apothecary do what is here forbidden, and he sells a box or bottle without being wrapped up with a label with the proper address and so forth, who is to be hit ? The verywvords of the section say it is the owner, the proprietor. If a corporation can be a proprietor it is clear. Lord Blackburn: I should say at present you have made out your point on this section 17, that the word person is used in the sense to include, not only a natural person, but an artificial one, and that consequently if in this business anyone does sell poisons without labelling them, whether wholesale or not, that the corporation would be liable. It weakens the argument against you that in every instance in the Act “person” means a natural person, because it appears there is one where it does not. Mr. Benjamin : But then I beg your lordships to re¬ member this, you have the view of the Legislature in relation to offences in general, although in a particular Act speaking of convictions and indictments that the word “ person ” under the Act, defining the offence, does include corporations, because section 14 of the Act of George IV., to which I called attention, says, “wherever this or any other statute relating to any offences, whether punishable upon indictment or summary conviction, I say that those words “whether punishable upon indictment or summary conviction ” are not words of limitation. Lord Blackburn : What are they ? It looks un¬ commonly like it. No doubt it would apply to section 17. Mr. Benjamin: “That wherever this or any other statute relating to any offence, whether punishable upon indictment or summary conviction, in describing or referring to the offence, or the subject matter on or with respect to which it shall be committed, or the offender or the party affected or intended to be affected by the offence, hath used or shall use words importing the singular number or the masculine gender only, yet the statute shall be understood to include several matters as well as one matter, and several persons as well as one person, and females as well as males, and bodies corporate as well as individuals.” Lord Blackburn : Surely that is an offence. Section 17 does, to my mind, constitute an offence, and consequently the person there would come within that Act. I think the context would show that. Mr. Benjamin: The 15th section constitutes an offence. The Lord Chancellor : No, its says, “ such penalty may be recovered by the Registrar to be appointed under this Act in the name and by the authority of the said Society in manner following, that is to say : In England or Wales, by plaint under the provisions of any Act in force for the more easy recovery of small debts and demands.” Lord Blackburn : No doubt it uses the word offence. It speaks of an offence, but it is not an offence in the same way as those referred to in the Act of George IY. That is a thing in the nature of a claim, this is a thing for which you are to sue for penalties. Mr. Benjamin: It is true the Act of George IV. says, wherever we as the Legislature speak of an offence, whether that offence be punishable by indictment or summary conviction, when we use the word “person” we mean corporate body also. Lord Watson : It is, in fact, a criminal penalty in the one case and a civil duty in the other ; that is the distinction. Mr. Benjamin : I should say so, my lord ; it is a very strong indication of the view of the Legislature. One cannot see the reason why a general body should be included when you speak of the offence, and there is an indictment, and not included if it is a penalty. The Lord Chancellor : I think there is a very good reason, because, of course, a criminal offence is something which is malum 'prohibitum by law, and any person, legal or natural, may be guilty of it who violates the law. Mr. Benjamin : You will observe this, my lord, that the penalty in this case is in the nature of a fine. It goes to the Crown ; it does not go to the informer. The Lord Chancellor : That seems to be of no import¬ ance at all, if it is a criminal offence punishable by summary conviction, although by fine. Lord Blackburn : Do the fines sued for in the county court go to the Crown ? Mr. Benjamin: Yes, my lord. Section 14 says: “All and every sums and sum of money which shall arise from any conviction and recovery of penalties for offences incurred under this Act shall be paid as the Commis¬ sioners of Her Majesty’s Treasury shall direct.” Lord Watson: There is nothing said that the applica¬ tion of the penalties is to the Government. Mr. Benjamin : No, my lord, but they are under the control of the Government. Lord Blackburn : The object of the statute of George IY. was this. We all know the old decisions had given very strange notions about some offences. There is a definition of forgery where it said forgery was with intent to defraud any person, and there has been a doubt expressed whether the Bank of England was a person. There was an express enactment passed as soon as the doubt was raised to say that the Bank of England, or any other corporation, should be a person within the meaning of the Act. That showed how far people went in their views of criminal acts. There was a doubt raised, and consequently the Legislature very sensibly said, we will settle it. Mr. Benjamin : In other words, it seems that the 90 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [July 31, I860. decision of the Court given that the Bank of England was not a person - Lord Blackburn : There never was a decision that I am aware of, but there was a doubt. Mr. Benjamin: There was, I believe, a decision; my learned friends have found out a decision. Lord Blackburn: It may be, but I thought it had never gone further than a doubt, and a doubt which I can only explain as arising from the extraordinary reluc¬ tance which existed to hang a man for forgery. Mr. Benjamin: I trust that this £5 penalty will not raise in your lordship’s mind that extreme reluctance. Lord Blackburn : It is not on that ground. It is not because a corporation is not liable and cannot be imprisoned or hanged, therefore it should not comply with the law. Mr. Benjamin: Then, my lord, sections 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22, are all for the organization of the Council, and of course have no reference to corporations. The Lord Chancellor : We may look at them as an illustration of the meaning of the word “person.” For example, the 20th and 21st sections provide for the eligibility of all persons registered as chemists and druggists under the Act to be members of the Council, and so on, plainly inapplicable to any but natural persons. Mr. Benjamin : It still comes back to my point, what¬ ever it may be worth,— it seems to me to be really a very good one, — that this Act is based, as its title indicated, on two classes of sections, one of them having reference to the person - - The Lord Chancellor : I do not think they have very much bearing on it. Mr. Benjamin : And the other having reference to the offence. All those which have reference to the person have reference to the Pharmacy Act of 1852, which provided a mode of establishing the qualification, registra¬ tion and examination, and this Act carries it further, and says that it is intended as an amendment of the other Act. But it says also that it is an Act on an entirely new subject, to prevent the sale of poisons to the public. So far as that is concerned, I apprehend that upon the true principles of construction you will take those sections, which have reference to the sale of poisons to the public, as originally independent legislation upon the subject, and entirely disconnect them from all other sections of the Act, which have reference to the qualification of individuals to their examination, and being brought into the Council and registered, and entered in the register. The Lord Chancellor : It would be a singular thing if, before the passing of this Act, there had been no single instance of a joint stock company of chemists and druggists formed under the Limited Liability Act, and then it would be a very singular thing if, having such companies, they were certainly made illegal by the opera¬ tion of general words, without any provision for rendering them legal. Mr. Benjamin : I think you will find in the Act of 1862 a provision, which makes it legal to form a body of any persons over twenty ; but a regulation that there is a saving of existing companies. The Lord Chancellor : I was thinking of the provision of the Joint Stock Companies Acts which you know was many years earlier than this Act in question. Mr. Benjamin : I have looked over them and 1 should imagine it would be always found that existing com¬ panies were saved. Lord Blackburn : That is not the point. In 1862 any number of persons could associate themselves for any trade. Apothecaries were certainly not excepted from the Act of 1862. I think, although I do not know whether the fact was that there were any corporations between 1S62 and 1868 which were formed for the purpose of carrying on the business of chemists and druggists, it is quite clear it might have been so. Mr. Benjamin : If that had been so, after all is there anything in this Act which would authorize such com¬ panies to go on selling poisons ? The Lord Chancellor : As far as I can see, they could not go on assuming the name, or professing the business of chemists and druggists if you are right, and it would be a singular thing if, by operation of mere general words, without any reference to their case, and without any special provision for it, such as you have for the executors of a deceased person in the 16th section, such companies were certainly made illegal, and all their business stopped. Mr. Benjamin : I do not know, my lord. The Lord Chancellor : It may be there was no such company, but at the same time — and we know how largely the Joint Stock Companies Act was taken ad¬ vantage of — one thinks it would bo a very unlikely thing for the Legislature to assume there were no such com¬ panies. Mr. Benjamin : We can discover whether there were any. I rather think there were none. The Lord Chancellor : If there were not, the Legisla¬ ture might not have thought of them. Mr. Benjamin : I do not think I can usefully keep up this discussion further. I have submitted to your lord- ships everything that occurs to me in support of the judgments of the Court of Queen’s Bench ; and, looking at the whole of it, I cannot help thinking that Mr. Justice Mellor’s judgment is a most satisfactory one. Mr. Lumley Smith : If your lordship pleases, I am with my friend, Mr. Benjamin, in this case, and I shall occupy but a very short time. Mr. Benjamin : My lord, I have in my hand that which I ought to have called your attention to for one moment, for what it may be worth, an Act passed in the year 1875, I think it is, a similar Act which was passed for Ireland by the Legislature. It is the 38 and 39 Yic. c. 57, and in the 30th section of that Act the prohibition against keeping open shop has been enlarged, instead of diminished, and in Ireland it is by legislation in 1875 pro¬ vided that so much of the Act of 1795 as prohibited keeping open shop within the meaning of the said Act by any person, other than a licentiate of Apothecaries’ Hall, shall be repealed. Provided always that it shall be un¬ lawful for any person to keep open shop for retailing, dispensing, or compounding poisons within the meaning of the Act of the 33rd and 34th of the reign of Victoria, or dispensing medical prescriptions, unless such persons be registered. So that in Ireland the prohibition goes even to the compounding of ordinary prescriptions. Lord Blackburn : It does not touch the question whether a corporation be within the Act. Mr. Benjamin : No ; I merely point out to your lord- ship that the view of the Legislature with regard to prohibition seems to be rather to extension than to re¬ striction. Mr. Lumley Smith : The general propositions which I ask your lordships to adopt before coming to the particular words of the Act of Parliament seem to be simple, and as far as I know there will be no difference between the counsel on the two sides. It is first of all this : That the word “person” may include the word “corporation.” I think that we have already heard from your lordships and probably will be conceded at once. Then I should ask your lordships to say further that “person” does in¬ clude the word “corporation,” in cases where there is no¬ thing in the context which shows a contrary intention. I do not know that that would be disputed. Then I should press on your lordships this, that it does not follow because there are sections in an Act of Parliament in which the word “person” must necessarily be construed to apply only to natural persons that in other sections in which the word “person” may include “corporation,” that it must necessarily be so interpreted as always throughout the whole Act to have the same meaning. It may very well be that in some sections the word “person” could from the context only mean a natural person; whereas there are other sections in which, having regard July 31, 1880.] :\ THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 91 to the mischief which was to he dealt with or the remedy which was to be applied, that the word “persons” could in¬ clude both corporations and natural persons. And, my lords, there are one or two cases in which the considera¬ tion of that question has arisen, and I will shortly bring them before your lordships. There is the case of Boyd v. The Croydon Railway Company, in 4 Bingham, New Cases, p. 669. I cannot say that the cases I am about to quote, or arising out of Act of Parliament, are at all resembling this; but there are cases in which the word “person” has been discussed. That was a case of an Act which in¬ corporated a railway company, and there was a provision which is very usual in such Acts of Parliament, that no action was to be brought against any person for anything done in pursuance of this Act without twenty-one days’ notice given to the defendant, and the decision of the Court of Common Pleas there was that the word person included company, and that they were entitled to notice on being sued for obstructing the way in carrying the Act int® effect. The Lord Chancellor : It is very obvious that in such an Act as that that the company was the person pri¬ marily dealt with. The powers are all given to the com¬ pany. Lord Blackburn : If “person” can include a corporation, and it is not disputed that it can, I should think that it ought to have included it in that Act. Mr. Lumley Smith : In that case there was this point on which great stress was laid, that there was an inter¬ pretation of the word corporation. The word corporation frequently occurred in the Act, and in the interpretation clause there was an interpretation of the word “ corpora¬ tion,” and the argument was that as throughout the Act of Parliament wherever “ company ” or “ corporation ” was meant there had been an interpretation clause, that the word “ person ” must mean something else ; but Chief Justice Tyndall there says this: “On a proper construction of the 109th section I think the company are within this protection in many parts of the Act ; it is true that the word ‘ person ’ cannot include company, as where it is put in opposition to the word company, or is expressly confined to directors. The question is whether in section 109 it is used in such a qualified or restrictive sense. Looking at the whole section it seems clearly to embrace every description of person who shall have proceeded bond fide to carry the Act into effect,” and so on. Mr. Justice Parkes says this : “ In a statute which contains nearly 200 sections, there may be several in which the woi'd ‘ person ’ does not include the word ‘ company.’ ” It does not follow that there may not be others in which that word does not clearly comprehend them. I am only using that to show that it does not tallow that the word person must necessarily have the same meaning throughout the Act of Parliament. There is one other case to which I will also draw attention in which the same rule is laid down. That is the case of Cortis v. The Kent Water Company, 7 Barnwell and Cresswell, p. 314. That is a case in which by an old Act of Parliament for lighting and paving Woolwich, and for the relief of the poor, certain persons, commissioners, were entitled to levy a rate upon every person or persons who held, occupied or possessed land in the parish. There the argument was that “person” did not include “corpora¬ tion” and that the rate as made against them was bad. It was held after discussion that the corporation were included and that they were liable to be rated. There was considerable stress laid upon this that the mode of appeal given to the persons rated and who were aggrieved was by appeal to the quarter sessions in which the appel¬ lant was bound to enter into a recognizance, and it was argued that inasmuch as a corporation could not enter into a recognizance that therefore it did not come within the provision of the Act. Mr. Justice Bailey upon that, after drawing attention to the fact that under the old Poor Law Acts, occupiers and corporations had always been rated and that there was nothing in this Act which showed an intention to relieve corporations from a liability which previously existed, goes on to discuss the question as to the word “ person,” and he says the first objection to the plaintiff’s right of action was that a body corporate does not come within the meaning of the 16th section of the 47 Geo. III. c. Ill ; and he says there does not appear to be any intention to exonerate any person who was liable before that time to contribute to the poor rates. Then he goes on : “ The word ‘ person ’ may be confined to individuals in their natural capacity, and it may extend to bodies politic. By the statute 43 Elizabeth, which was a statute in pari materia, every competent person, or vicar, or keeper of any land or tenement was liable to contribute to the relief of the poor. Now, these words do not of necessity extend to a corporation, but they have been construed to include the corporation. The statute also gives a right of appeal to any person or persons aggrieved by any rate. It is said in this case that it must be collected from a consideration of the clauses of this Act that corporations were not intended to be included, inasmuch as the person or persons appealing against the rate are required to enter into a recognizance, and that a corporation cannot do so. If it were necessary to decide that point I should pause before I decided that a corporation were not competent to enter into a recog¬ nizance. I am aware there is a dictum to say they cannot do so ; but they may appoint an attorney,” and so on. Then Mr. Justice Littledale in the same, case, speaking of that portion of the argument which was addressed to entering into recognizances, said : “ It has been said that as the 106th section gives an appeal to every person aggrieved, but he has to enter into recog¬ nizances with two sureties, and as a corporation cannot enter into recognizances, those provisions show clearly that a corporation was not intended to be included by the Legislature in this Act of Parliament, because it could not be intended to compel a corporation to do an act which is impossible. But where an Act of Parliament directs a thing to be done which it was impossible for a corpora¬ tion to do, but which other persons may do ; and another act, which a corporation as well as others can do, then the corporation will be excused from doing the thing which it cannot do, and will be compelled to do the act which it is capable of doing. Assuming therefore, that a corporation cannot of itself enter into a recognizance, still its sureties may, and I think, therefore, that a corporation might satisfy this clause with regard . to sureties. I would remark with regard to the reasoning of Mr. Justice Littledale, where certain acts have to be done which a corporation cannot do, that it may be excused from doing it. I think if the case had arisen, before the passing of this Act, of a company carrying on the business of a chemist and druggist, such as it has been suggested the Society of Apothecaries were doing, that they would not be prevented from registering by the form in the schedule. If there were some words used in the schedule which were inapplicable to a corporation, but nevertheless the Act of Parliament showed an intention that corporations might be registered, or rather the Act of Parliament gave the power of being registered to all persons who had carried on the business, probably some other form of application would have been held sufficient, and would have entitled them to be registered. The Lord Chancellor : Do you say, in addition to that, that under the 18th section a corporation may be eligible to be elected, and to be a member of the Pharmaceutical Society? Mr. Lumley Smith : No, my lord, certainly not, be¬ cause the power of being a member of the Pharmaceutical Society is confined to persons who could register as chemists and druggists, and must be personal. Ordinarily a pharmaceutical chemist must have been examined. The Lord Chancellor : It says, “ Every person who, at the time of the passing of the Act, is or has been in business on his own account as a chemist and druggist as 92 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [July 31, 1880. aforesaid, and who shall be registered 'as a chemist and druggist, shall be eligible to be elected, and continue to be a member of the Pharmaceutical Society according1 to the bye-laws thereof.” Those words, “ every person,” seem to include anyone who may be so eligible. Mr. Lumley Smith : I have not got the bye-laws here before me, but no doubt the bye-laws would prevent a company coming in. The Lord Chancellor : Supposing they do, that would diminish the force of the observation, that every person was required to be registered who is expressly declared to be capable of being elected a member of the Society, and therefore no person can be required to be registered who, either by the bye-laws or otherwise, could not possibly be a member of that Society. Mr. Lumley Smith : I do not, of coui’se, willingly admit the latter part of your lordship’s proposition that, because they may be registered and yet were not eligible to be members of the Pharmaceutical Society, that it follows that they could not be registered unless they could be members. It may be. It may be it does state it in terms ; but there is no doubt that those enabling sections were intended to apply to individuals and not to corporations. The Lord Chancellor : It seems strong evidence that the Legislature thought it required registration only of persons who could be admitted to the privilege. Mr. Lumley Smith : On that I think there is no doubt it may be taken as a fact that at the time this Act of Parliament was passed, there was no company in existence which was carrying on any business of this kind. The Lord Chancellor : If that could be shown in any way that we are at liberty to take notice of it would be at least useful for us to know it. Mr. Lumley Smith: In the year 1868 there were, of course, a good many companies, but they were all regis¬ tered and the registry would speak for itself. It is a public document. Lord Blackburn : Have you looked at the registry to see? Mr. Lumley Smith : I am told, as a fact, there are none. I do not know that it has been searched. Mr. Wills : I believe there were several already in existence dispensing their own drugs. Mr. Lumley Smith : At the time this Act was passed, there are the blue books, and the select committee, and so on, and the facts seem to be these: There were no companies formed at all for the purpose of carrying on the business of chemists and druggists. There were certain co-operative stores coming into existence. I believe the Civil Service Stores was begun the year before this, about 1867, but at that time none of them had commenced the business of dealing in drugs. The Lord Chancellor : If they were not registered as chemists and druggists I should not think it would very much affect the question. Mr. Lumley Smith : As far as we have been able to trace back the first and only connection of the stores with chemists and druggists arose in this way: that certain chemists were willing to give advantages to customers who were members of the stores, and it was not until some years after the passing of this Act of 1868 that any of them began the system of selling drugs. I may say a word about the stores. The ordinary stores are not companies, such as this which is now before your lord- ships, because the theory of the large co-operative stores, such as the Civil Service and the Army and Navy, is that they supply only member's. The privilege may be abused and goods may be purchased by or for other persons who are not actually members, but the theory of the stores is, that it is an agglomeration of persons buying wholesale and therefore at a cheap rate for division amongst their own private personal members, and it is very much in that respect like the supplying of wines to members of a club. Lord Blackburn : A great many co-operative stores, as they are called, now have shareholders. Mr. Lumley Smith : It is confined to shareholders. Lord Watson: I think they have both shareholders and members. Mr. Lumley Smith : I am not sure about members. Lord Watson : They have shareholders who participate in the profits, and a number of persons only members who are not shareholders, but who have leave to buy. They do not sell to the whole of the public. Lord Blackburn : It is not because it is a store that this body would be excluded, but because it is a corpo¬ ration. Mr. Lumley Smith : It does not at all follow, if their case came before the Courts on the legality of selling drugs to a member by the Army and Navy Stores, or the Civil Service, that it would be found on that case that it was an open shop. Here it is found as a fact in the case that it was an open shop, established for sale to the public and it is an open shop. Lord Blackburn: The mischief would be obviously quite as great; the chance of a member of the co¬ operative stores being poisoned if the stores left it to women or children to administer their drugs, which I do not think they would do, is quite as great as anybody else. Mr. Lumley Smith : If he is a member he is a con¬ senting party; there will be no injuria. I think, my lord, those are all the general remarks I have to make ; but there is one other case which Lord Coleridge considered recently, a case of the G-uardians of Shoreditch against Franklin. The only remark of Lord Coleridge that I should quote in favour of my view is one which, I think, would hardly be disputed— that “ person ” included corporation, and the Act must be considered secundum subjectam materiam. Lord Blackburn : This decision then, I think, was not a “person” within the meaning of the statute, where the person aggrieved sued for the penalty. Mr. Lumley Smith : On this ground, that a common informer had to make an affidavit, and a corporation could not. Lord Blackburn : The common informer used to have to make an affidavit. If I recollect right they never could be informers so long as common informers were required to make personal affidavits ; but then when the making of the affidavit had been taken away, the argu¬ ment was that the incapacity of corporations remained. The Lord Chancellor : Where is that case ? Mr. Lumley Smith : It is in the 3rd C. P. Division, 337. He no doubt said that they never had been common informers. His words are, I think it undesirable that corporations should be common informers. The general doctrine of the text-books is against it, and there is no doubt under the earlier statute corporations could not be informers, because they could not make affidavits, and I think they cannot in this case. He seems rather to have gone on grounds of public policy. The proposition I should cull from it is this : “ Undoubtedly the word ‘ person ’ may in one sense include a corporation, but the Act must be construed secundum subjectam materiam, and we must ascertain whether a corporation is within the words.” Lord Blackburn : That principle I should think your opponents would quote, as well as yourself ; it is the application of it. Mr. Lumley Smith : It shows that it is not because it means the natural person in one case, therefore it cannot mean a corporation in another. Now, my lords, broadly on the statute — I do not intend to go particularly through it, but I should suggest this, that there were two things which the Legislature had to look at, that poisons might be sold, and that persons might keep a shop for the sale of poisons. There is no doubt that in ordinary cases where poisons were sold, there would be very great diffi¬ culty in tracing the actual hand that sold the poison. There might be large establishments; there might be several assistants, and it would be very difficult indeed to July 31, 1880] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 93 say who actually sold the poison, but it would be very easy to find out who kept the shop. The man’s name would be up over the door; he would pay rent, and therefore the difficulty of proof, which Lord Blackburn spoke of lately, seems to have been very much intended to be met by imposing the penalty on the person who kept the shop. Lord Blackburn : It ought to have said the person who keeps open shop, in which there are not qualified sellers, because the object was not, as far as the protection of the public goes, to punish a man for drawing profit from the sale of drugs ; it was to prevent the actual sale by an unqualified person. Mr. Lumley Smith : I must take . the liberty of limiting your lordship’s words to the selling of poisonous drugs. Lord Blackburn : I am not at all sure of that. Mr. Lumley Smith : Under this Act of Parliament, a man must not call himself a chemist and druggist. The public are entitled to know this ; if a man write it on his door that he is a chemist and druggist, they are entitled to know that he has passed his examination. Lord Blackburn: They mixed the two together, keeping open shop and selling poisons. Mr. Lumley Smith : No doubt poisons do enter into a large number of things. Lord Blackburn : He might put up, I am not a chemist and druggist, I am a man who sells various drugs and various medicines which are not poisonous. Mr. Lumley Smith : Anybody can do that. Lord Blackburn : But I think anybody who set that up would find his custom fall off. The Lord Chancellor : It would certainly be a curious thing. The Act prohibits the assumption of the title of chemist and druggist and so on, but it does not anywhere that I see prohibit persons carrying on the business of a chemist and druggist. Mr. Lumley Smith : Oh, no. I think the history of that is clear when you come to look at the earlier Act. There were before 1852 various classes of chemists — there were a certain number of them who chose to pass an examination, and thereby became pharmaceutical chemists. I dare say your lordship may have seen in chemists’ shops very often a very handsome diploma displayed in the shop window with the arms of the Pharmaceutical Society. Therefore at that time a man who voluntarily joined this body had a certain grade, because he was known to be a person of instruction. Then they found that other chemists who kept shops called themselves pharmaceutical chemists, and therefore the Act of 1852 was passed, and the only restriction in that laid on the trade was this, that nobody shall call himself a pharma¬ ceutical chemist unless he is registered as a member of that Society. That is the only restriction. Lord Blackburn : Is it now settled that pharmaceutical is right? I remember there was a great controversy when Lord Campbell called it pharmaceutical or phar- makeutical, I forget which, and it went into the Court of Error, and it seemed to me that the Court of Appeal were more anxious to prove that he was wrong in the way he pronounced the word than in the way he laid down the law. Mr. Lumley Smith : The Court of Exchequer Cham¬ ber thought it was pharmakeutical. I do not know whether the Judicature Act has altered that. The Lord Chancellor : At all events what you say is that the thing prohibited by the 12th section of that Act was the assumption or use of the title of pharmaceutical or pharmakeutical chemists or pharmacists.. Mr. Lumley Smith : Yes, my lord, that is all. The Lord Chancellor : That is enlarged by this Act. He must not assume the title of chemist and druggist. Mr. Lumley Smith : That is so. It goes by steps. It shows the necessity the Legislature felt for making the Act more stringent ; but they thought proper to save the rights of those already established. Of course, this Act of Parliament says “ you shall not call yourself a pharmaceu¬ tical chemist or chemist and druggist, but carry on the trade you may ; you may call yourself a herbalist or a wholesale druggist, you may do what you like as to that, but you must not assume either of those titles. ” Then it gives further bye-laws on the question of poisons. There is this remark suggested as to this prohibition that you are not bound to wait until a man has made a sale. It may be, if a man has a shop open with poisons exhibited in the window, you are not bound to wait until he has actually poisoned somebody or sold poisons ; but you can at once proceed for the penalty, and so there is a certain facility of proof given and of preventing poisons being sold by enabling a penalty to be recovered from those who are keeping open shop. Eor facility of proof it seems to have been considered that the person who was at the head of the shop should be the responsible person. Your lordships see that not only is it considered expedient for the safety of the public that the persons selling poisons and so on should be qualified ; but the Legislature is rather desirous that all persons who are keeping the shop should have a competent practical knowledge. My lords, this is not the sole instance of a limit to the capacity of carrying on a business. I may take the case of an ordinary solicitor. It is not everyone who is entitled to carry on the business of a solicitor ; it is limited to certain persons. There have been a great number of cases in which it has been held that a qualified solicitor, being in partnership with an unqualified solicitor, subjects himself to penalties. I never heard yet of a joint stock company being formed for the purpose of distributing law. Lord Blackburn : In the case of solicitors they are officers of the Court. It is a very different position. Any person, not being qualified, who sells, I suppose that must mean the person who superintends the sale. It could hardly be said that if a qualified assistant was there and directs the apprentice boy, who knew nothing about it, to tie up a parcel and hand to the gentleman who was there, that the boy was selling ; it would be the head man who was selling. Mr. Lumley Smith : My lord, I should think that with regard to the sale of poison the actual person who . sold would be liable. There is nothing to limit his liability. The more difficult point, if I may put it, is this. Sup¬ posing you have a qualified chemist ; supposing he has a manager who directs the boy to make the sale ; and sup¬ posing the boy sells a packet without a proper label. Lord Blackburn : Do not take the label case, because that is a special section ; but take it that I go into a shop and I ask for a pennyworth of strychnine, and that they know me well enough, and that the man who actually sells, the qualified assistant, has gone upstairs and the non-qualified apprentice sells. I take it he would be the person selling and who would be liable to a penalty. Mr. Lumley Smith : He would seem to come within the Act. Then comes the necessity of making liable the man who keeps the shop. Lord Blackburn : I do not see that that is a case of necessity. I can understand that the manager of the shop, being himself qualified, might sell by a non-qualified person and so become liable ; but I do not see the neces¬ sity so long as the qualified person superintends the sale. Mr. Lumley Smith : You get all these difficulties which have come in, which arise with regard to the proprietors of newspapers when they say, we were not aware that a certain article was inserted, and so on. The Legislature has thought difficulties might arise, because there might be a question whether the master had authorized it. Suppose the master said, “ I told the boy always to put the label on.” Lord Blackburn: That would not do. It would be like the old analogy, which explains it very well, the under-sheriff or the bailiff must be present in an arrest. The man who has got the warrant may arrest and the assistants whom he has got with him; but if the assis- 94 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [July 31, 1880. tant arrests, and the man who has got the warrant i3 not present, it is illegal. Mr. Lumley Smith : Inasmuch as these penalties were to be recovered before county court judges sitting all over England, who might take different views of the law, and might not have the case argued and the authorities before them, they might have felt a doubt as to whether or not the master was responsible for the act of the boy ; therefore, whatever the reason may have been, the Legislature ha 3 thought it necessary to make both these matters of offence, either the selling of poison, or the keeping an open shop for the sale of poison; and it seems to have intended that there should be at the head of the business, a man who had a competent practical knowledge. It may be, as your lordships said, that a corporation is not likely to come in and interfere with carrying on the trade ; but the Legislature wished to have somebody at the head responsible for having a competent practical knowledge. There is no doubt, if you have a manager who looks after the business, he may be a qualified man, but the interest in the success of a trade which is felt by a paid manager is very different to that felt by a person who is actual proprietor of the business. It certainly seems to have been con¬ templated that, wherever there was an open shop kept, there should be at the head of it a responsible man, a man who had a competent practical knowledge. When we look at section 1. If it stopped halfway, I apprehend there could be no doubt in the world, that a corporation would be intended — if it stopped at the words “Great Britain.” The words are: “From and after the 31st December, 1868, it shall be unlawful for any person to sell or keep open shop for retailing, dis- pensiDg, or compounding poisons, or to assume or use the title of ‘chemist and druggist,’ or ‘chemist,’ or ‘druggist,’ or pharmacist,’ or ‘dispensing chemist’ or ‘druggist,’ in any part of Great Britain.” If it stopped there, I apprehend there could not be any doubt in the world. Lord Blackburn : One would be perfectly incapable of understanding what it meant. Of course “ person ” there must have included everybody. Mr. Lumley Smith : Suppose it has entirely prohibited the sale of poisons, as it might prohibit the sale of any particular drug. I will not say it is illegal to sell any drug, but they might have said, “We prohibit the sale of poisons.” Then it is clear that would have included corporations. Very well, but it makes an exception. Practically it comes to this : — -No person shall keep a shop, unless such person be a chemist. The Lord Chancellor : It i3 very probable those words are as important as any in the whole Act for the deter¬ mination of the matter ; but do not they say that such person is contemplated as is within the exception ? Mr. Lumley Smith : That of course is the whole point. I ask your lordship to adopt the proposition that the word “ person ” in the same Act of Parliament may mean in some cases a natural person, and in others artificial persons, and I a-k your lordship to go further and say, that in the same section there is no reason why the word “ person ” should not mean different things. The whole distinction is this : — in one case you have a prohibitive enactment, and then comes the enabling enactment ; and the distinction that runs through that section runs through the whole Act of Parliament. The Lord Chancellor : Suppose there were an Act of this sort, that no person shall carry on the business of bankers unless he be thirty years of age, would not you say the rule would receive light from the exception ? Mr. Lumley Smith : In that case, perhaps. Lord Blackburn : Especially if the Bank of England had been carrying on business as Apothecaries’ Hall had. Mr. Lumley Smith: Would your lordships draw the conclusion from that, that a corporation could be bankers nevertheless? The I/ord Chancellor : The words “ unless he be thirty years of age” plainly show what sort of person the Legislature had in mind, namely, persons wh > might be above or below that age. So here persons who may have this class of qualification. Mr. Lumley Smith: May I put the hypothetical enactment in a different form ? Suppose it said “no bank shall be kept in England except by a person of thirty years of age.” Then clearly a corporation could not keep it. Lord Blackburn: That is what Mr. Benjamin put ; unwittingly he changed the frame of the words. That is not exactly it. Mr. Lumley Smith : I am putting it wittingly here. The Lord Chancellor : There you would have a general prohibition independent of any question of personality and an exception of that provision in favour of persons of a certain age. Mr. Lumley Smith : That is how I ask you to read this section. I say that is what the Legislature meant. Lord Blackburn : If I could see that the Legislature meant that, I quite agree it would not be too great a strain ; but I have not been able to see that that is what the Legislature meant. Mr. Lumley Smith: That is the view the Court of Queen’s Bench took, that it was intended to be a general prohibition with this exempting power to certain persons. Lord Blackburn : I am not quite sure that the Chief Justice took that view. It was certainly the view that Mr. Justice Mellor took, and if it were clear that the Legislature meant that there would be a great deal of force in it. Air. Lumley Smith : That is really the whole substance of the thing, whether or not, this is a general prohibition, and you get that from the preamble which states that it is advisable for the safety of the public that persons keeping open shop should have a practical knowledge. How can a company have a practical knowledge ? Lord Blackburn : I do not see that the Legislature implies that a corporation may not keep an open shop if their manager has a practical knowledge. Mr. Lumley Smith : We go by steps; s It does desire there should be a competent knowledge, and on this your lordships say you fail to see how far there is a broad prohibition ; but when you come to the 17th section it really does contain a broad prohibition. “ It shall be unlawful to sell any poison.” Lord Blackburn : But that is not only by retail, but in the earlier part of it, wholesale. Mr. Lumley Smith: In the 17th section the wholesale is exempted. Lord Blackburn : No, they are within it. Lord Watson: They are brought into it expressly. Lord Blackburn : They are exempted from the rest of the Act ; in the 17th they are brought in. Lord Watson: Therefore it necessarily covers many persons. Mr. Lumley Smith: 13 that so about the wholesale dealers ? It says “ For the purposes of this section - Lord Blackburn : Look at the beginning of it : “ It shall be unlawful to sell any poison either by wholesale or retail.” Mr. Lumley Smith : There is a special limitation of that lower down in the section : “ For the purposes of this section the person on whose behalf any sale is made by any apprentice or servant shall be deemed to be the seller, but the provisions of this section, which are solely applicable to poisons in the first part of the schedule (A) to this Act, or which require that the label shall contain the name and address of the seller, shall not apply to articles to be exported from Great Britain by wholesale dealers, nor to wholesale dealing.” Lord Blackburn : I do not quite know how a wholesale person would sell at all, except it is in the ordinary course of wholesale dealing. Mr. Lumley Smith: It was probably intended to apply to the sale of large quantities by an ordinary chemist and July 31, 1SS0.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 95 druggist. At any rate, I submit, that really takes all the sting out of the first part of the section. Then I ask your lordships to consider this. What your lordships are pressed with is that no mischief is done by the case of an unqualified person having a qualified assistant. The mischief that would result from a decision up¬ holding the decision of the Appeal Court would be this, that there is nothing in the Act of Parliament that makes it necessary to have a qualified assistant. If it is held that corporations do not come within this Act of Parliament, this company may go on in Tot¬ tenham Court Road without any qualified assistant upon it, and yet penalties for keeping an open shop may be impossible. Lord Blackburn : The penalty for keeping an open shop, but not the penalty for selling. Mr. Lumley Smith : But, my lord, is that so ? because if corporations are not within this Act at all, there is no penalty for selling. Lord Blackburn : Yes, there is. Mr. Lumley Smith : If a corporation is not included in this Act of Parliament, then it only comes in by a side wind ; because it says that a corporation is included in the case where there is summary conviction. Then it may be so ; but if, broadly, corporations are not within scope of this Act of Parliament, then, although there was not a qualified person on the premises, the corporation would go scot free. That would be a most dangerous doctrine to lay down. There is no privilege given to assistants. Whether an assistant is qualified or un¬ qualified is a matter which the Legislature has entirely passed by. The very fact that, in a certain case, power to carry on a business by a qualified assistant is given to executors by section 16, shows that in every other case the mere fact that an assistant is qualified does not entitle a person to carry on business. If corporations are not within the Act at all, they are not bound to have a qualified assistant at all. Now, my lords, one word more as to whether a company could be formed for the purpose of carrying on this business. The Lord Chancellor : I have sent for Mr. Wilcocks’ book on the laws relating to the medical profession, and I find there a charter of King James I. to the Apothecaries’ Company, in which they are constituted a corporation by the name of the “Master, the Wardens, and Society of the Art and Mystery of Pharmacopists.” Besides various powers of regulation, I think it is pretty clear that they are contemplated not only from that name, but otherwise, as actually selling medicines ; because they have been obviously one with the grocers’ company, and in another charter under the same name. Then there is this clause “ That the master, wardens, and society might have and enjoy all such franchises, privileges, advantages, etc., in respect of aromatics, pharmacy, drugs, and other things appertaining to their trade as they did before when included in the grocers’ company,” and he also says, at page 19, that even at that period the apothecaries were regarded as a trading company in the city. Mr. Lumley Smith: That may be. Your lordships will remember this, that the position of apothecaries has changed of late years. In old days the apothecary really was what a chemist and druggist is now, and kept a shop for the sale of drugs. He was not a surgeon ; but apothecaries were vendors of drugs. You will remember in “ Romeo ” he goes to the shop of the “lean apothecary,” where he finds all these simples exposed for sale. The chemists and druggists now occupy the position formerly occupied by the apothecary, and apothecaries have become now the ordinary medical men. I have read through this deed, and if your lordships will allow me to tell you in two words what the purport is, I will do so. It recites that there have been certain persons, proprietors of stock, carrying on this business. It recites that the partnership should be dissolved, and then it forms a new partnership, con¬ sisting of two classes. One is the first class, consisting of one hundred and twenty persons, each of whom brings in a certain portion of capital. The others, the second class, consisting of two hundred proprietors, bringing in a small quantity of capital. The deed provides that everybody of the second class should be a practical apothecary, that is to say, that he should be an apothecary in actual practice on his own account. Then the first class are to be elected out of the second class, and they must be liverymen. So that it comes to this, that the Society is carried on by two hundred men who must be apothecaries, and by one hundred and twenty, who must be both apothecaries and livery¬ men of the company. They are entitled to use the premises of the master and wardens and the manage¬ ment — that is the only other point that may be interesting — is to be superintended by a committee of managers, con¬ sisting of the master and wardens for the time being, and thirty of the proprietors of the first class. So that the mas¬ ter and wardens are always elected from the livery, and apparently they are all apothecaries. It is really in fact a society of apothecaries. Now we have the fact that that was a partnership carried on at the time when this Act was passed, because the deed is in 1822. I submit to your lordships that in one of two ways that society have been exempted from this Act. First we were pressed with the apprehension that this Act might put an end to the trade of this Society. First of all I have submitted that they might have registered, because they were in fact chemists and druggists carrying on business at that time. There would have been a difficulty about the actual form of the schedule to be signed; but supposing they could not register, then section 16 would have protected them. Section 16 provides that “ nothing hereinbefore contained shall extend to or interfere with the business of any legally qualified apothecary.” Now, the actual business of an apothecary admitted according to this old charter was not in advising a patient whether he had a fever or not, but in vending drugs, and the actual business of an apothecary was in keeping a shop for the sale of drugs. Then if these two hundred gentlemen or more were all carrying on busi¬ ness under this name of the Apothecaries’ Society, being in fact a private partnership, they would be all protected by that section, “ Nothing hereinbefore contained shall interfere with the business of an apothecary.” Doubtless they would have to sell poisons with labels in the same way. That would come within section 17 ; but see the position of that section, some stress may be laid on that. The position of section 16 comes immediately after section 15, which is a general one with regard to keeping shop, Then comes that section from which they are not exempted ; because when it comes to the actual regula¬ tion as to the sale of poisons it is desirable that all the world should be within it. I think, my lords, the position of that section in the Act of Parliament rather goes to show that the previous section was intended to be universal ; and then this clause was put in. Only one more word, my lords, on the remark that fell from the Lord Chancellor as to whether it was intended to prevent chemists and druggists taking advantage of the Limited Liability Act. The Lord Chancellor : I ought to have said the J oint Stock Companies Act. Mr. Lumley Smith : Yes, my lord. The case your lordship put was the case of certain chemists and druggists. Consider how far the argument would lead. I leave out the chemists and druggists, and consider the proposition whether or not a company could be formed of ordinary persons for the purpose of carrying on the business of chemists and druggists, although they were not qualified persons. I think a difficulty would arise in this way ; because the Act of Parliament under which joint stock companies are regulated restricts them to be companies formed for a lawful purpose. Now it is admitted in this case that if an individual was doing what the company have done here, if Mr. Mackness had 96 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS, [July 31, 1880. not formed himself into a company as he did in this case, that it would have been an unlawful act. Lord Blackburn : It may, if he remained subsequent to 1868 ; but if he had done it between 1862 and 1868 there would not be a pretence for saying so. Mr. Lumley Smith : Probably that would be so ; but since 1868, supposing we have the case of a firm formed now ; if a certain number of persons were to form them¬ selves into a company and to state in their memorandum of association that they were formed for the purpose of keeping open shop for the sale of poisons, that, I submit, would be for an illegal purpose, and the company illegal. Lord Blackburn : Is it not rather begging the question. It would be because they are prohibited by the Act from doing so. Mr. Lumley Smith : My friend will admit, I think, that if an ordinary individual had kept an open shop, if Mr. Mackness had kept an open shop, although he had a qualified assistant, he would have been breaking the law. Lord Blackburn: Probably he would. Mr. Lumley Smith : If half a dozen or more gentlemen choose to get up a company for doing that which an ordi¬ nary individual could not do, I should submit it would be for an illegal purpose. Of course, as your lordship says, it would be begging the question if you say by forming the company they cease to be within the Act. You see in the memorandum of association of this company they carefully give the go-bye to that difficulty, because they are expressly stated to be formed for the purpose of carrying on the grocery business, or the business of Mr. Mackness, and there is not a word about chemists and druggists in it. I do not think I can usefully add any¬ thing more to the argument; but I submit that the judgment of the Appellate Court ought to be reversed. Mr. Wills : I appear, my lords, in support of the judgment of the Court of Appeal, and after the ample discussion which the case has already received so much of the ground has been covered, that my observations may, I think, be compressed within a very few words. After all, the arguments on the one side and the argu¬ ments on the other may be put into two or three sentences. The argument of my learned friend is that what is done in the Act amounts to a general prohibition; that cer¬ tain persons may bring themselves within the excepted words to allow them to carry on this trade ; if you cannot do so by reason of your being a company, tant pis pour vous. That is the end of it. That is the argument reduced to its lowest form. The argument on our side is that is not so; the prohibition is contained in express words. The words of the section when compared with the words of the rest of the Act of Parliament clearly show that “person” is used in its natural sense, and in that sense only ; and inasmuch as there is no prohibition except that which is contained in the section, if you can see by the rest of the Act that “person” there, as in the rest of the Act, meant a natural person there is no pro¬ hibition. Therefore, our argument is, looking to the terms of the Act, looking to the object for which the Act was passed, the prohibition is confined to natural persons, and does not mean there anything beyond natural persons. There are certain parts of the argument in the Court below which have been re¬ ferred to by my learned friend which I will deal with very shortly. For instance, my friends have said some¬ thing as to the argument which was presented to the Court below to show that “person” does not by any means necessarily, or it may be in Acts of Parliament, presumably, mean a corporation, unless by aid of an extending clause. My lords, the judgment of Lord J ustice Baggallay contains a sample of a number of Acts of Parliament, which had been brought before your lord- ships’ notice. I took half a dozen years, taking two or three just about the time when this Act was passed, two or three close to the present session, and one I think in the middle, and I showed them that the class of cases in which the word in question is extended to corporations by express enactment is extremely numerous, and that there is scarcely a case in modern Acts of Parliament where any doubt or question could arise as to the extension of the word “person” to corporations. The Lord Chancellor: Do you mean that there are many cases which are made very clear, and that, there¬ fore, the previous presumption of law must be changed ? Mr. Wills : I do not put it so high as that. I only point to that as showing the very extensive use of in¬ terpretation words in modern Acts of Parliament when it was intended to include corporations. Lord Watson : That is rather dangerous. You say there are these interpretation clauses, but do you deny that the onus is on you to say that “ person ” does not include legal as well as natural persons ? Mr. Wills : No, my lord, I do not attempt to deny that. Lord Watson : I am afraid if you examine the inter¬ pretation clauses, in many cases you will find that a statute extends the meaning of a word to a great many things it naturally includes. Lord Blackburn : I suppose it will answer your pur¬ pose just as well, and it would be quite indisputable to say that in common parlance if you use the word “ per¬ sons ” it means natural persons. For instance, no person in common talk would say the London and North Western Railway was the richest person in London. That is that in ordinary talk the word “person ” without any strict legal interpretation means a natural person, and the context shows in which sense it is used. Mr. Wills: I cannot help thinking that the use of the extending clause ha3 become much more common since the Act of George IV., to which my friend referred. There are a great number, and I have looked with some care at the Acts, where that interpretation clause is used, and it seems to be in all of them. They often put penalty clauses which by virtue of that Act of George IV. would extend to every person in certain parts of the Act necessarily, and then, in a number of other sections, where that kind of assistance is not given by any Act which has yet been passed — of course, Lord Brougham’s Act, which was passed for shortening Acts of Parliament, effected that ; then the framers of the Act have con¬ stantly used an interpretation clause for that purpose. Well, my lords, I do not desire to say any more about that, because after all, you really must look closely in all cases of this kind to the language of the particular Act, and I do not think that from the general principles one gets any great assistance. The general principles are tolerably familiar, and are tolerably well established ; the difficulty in most cases, when there is a difficulty, is in the application of them. Now, my lords, here what is the mischief which is really intended to be corrected ? Unless it may be, which my friends can hardly say, that this Act was framed by those who had one purpose, and passed by the Legislature for another purpose — if the purposes to which it is now sought to apply it had been recited, namely, that of putting an end to all joint stock enterprises in dealing with trade of this kind, I suppose there would have been no chance whatever of getting the Legislature to pass it. My friends have said that there were no companies existing at that day, no joint stock companies, for dealing in drugs, which would necessarily include the sale of poisons. I do not know how that is. There is no evidence on the subject. Those who instruct me say it is otherwise. Those who instruct my friends say one way and those who instruct me say the other ; and inasmuch as it is not before the Court, one cannot safely act on any presumption of that kind. All one can say is that there is no conceivable reason why that should not have been the state of things. Joint stock enter¬ prise had been very largely used already in the year 1868, and especially since 1852, since the Limited Liability Act has been introduced, and nobody can July 31, 1*880. J THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS, 97 doubt that this is a business which offers a great deal of temptation to embark in because it is one in which profits are ordinarily supposed to be large, as compared to the amount of capital embarked, and it is also a business which presents no difficulty whatever, in the nature of it, to carrying it on satisfactorily by properly qualified persons, managing, buying, selling and dispensing goods. Lord Watson: Your argument is much the same in either event, whether there were companies existing or not. There is not much difference between the intention of the Legislature to stop a company from trading or to prevent corporations trading in future. Mr. Wills : But there is one salient exception to any doubt or uncertainty on the subject, and that is the one that has been already presented to your lordship’s mind, namely, the case of the Apothecaries’ Company. I was very much surprised to hear it suggested to-day, because we threshed this out pretty well below, and no suggestion was made there that we were in error, that the Apothe¬ caries’ Company had for a great many years past carried on this trade. Now, it appears they do carry it on in their own name. We know perfectly well that every bottle we get which comes from there is marked with the name of the company, and one supposed that was so. It turns out now that the business is an apothecaries’ business carried on in the name of masters and wardens of the corporations, only that certain other persons who provided the capital, I suppose there having been no capital the property of the corporation itself, which had not some specific distinction which made it difficult to apply it to the purpose of carrying on the trade, and so they get certain other people to supply the capital ; but the business is carried on in their name, and the only result is that the profits must be disposed of in a particular way and for the benefit of particular persons. Now, can it have been the intention of the Act of Parliament, as it is un¬ doubtedly the effect of the Act of Parliament if my friends are right, to prevent the Apothecaries’ Hall dealing in medicines in future ? To state the proposition is its own refutation and yet how can it be doubted that, if my friends are right, that consequence must follow ? My friends have dwelt much on the fact of all the individual corporators or members being duly qualified apothecaries ; but duly qualified apothecaries are just the persons who are not entitled to carry on this business, because there is a provision in the earlier Act that so soon as a pharma¬ ceutical chemist becomes an apothecary under the licence of the Apothecaries’ Hall, that he is to cease to be a pharmaceutical chemist; therefore these persons are ex¬ pressly disqualified from carrying on this business. They are persons expressly excepted from those protected by this legislation. It is true, it is said that nothing shall interfere with the business of a legally qualified apothe¬ cary, but the business of a legally qualified apothecary is not the vending of drugs, but making them up for his patients. Mr. Benjamin : Will you refer to the clause of the Act in which it says that. You will only find that he ceases to be a member of the Society, not to be a phar¬ maceutical chemist. Mr. Wills : I believe it is there. I will not stay to look now ; but I am convinced there is some such enact¬ ment. Yes, it is section 11 of the Act of 1852. “That no person who is a member of the medical profession, or who is practising under right of a degree of any university or under a diploma or licence of a medical or surgical corporate body, shall be entitled to be registered under this Act, and if any registered pharmaceutical chemist shall obtain such diploma or- licence, his name shall not be retained on the said register during the time that he is engaged in practice as aforesaid.” That is the diploma or licence from a medical, surgical, or corporate body. I suppose that does not apply to Apothecaries’ Hall. Lord Watson : But he may dispense. Mr. Wills : I thought it was not only licentiates of medical bodies, I thought it included Apothecaries’ Hall. Lord Blackburn : No. Mr. Wills: I may be wrong there; but the fact of persons being legally qualified apothecaries does not make them — and that is quite enough for my purpose — phar¬ maceutical chemists. One really is almost entitled to com¬ plain of the extent to which, in this case, the confusion has been introduced — and it pervaded even one of the judg¬ ments of the Court of Queen’s Bench— the confusion be¬ tween the qualification of the individual corporator and the qualification of the corporate essence. I thought nothing was more clearly established than that as soon as a corporation was created by charter or any other means by which a corporation can be created, that the indi¬ viduals ceased to have any existence, except as persons having rights within the ambit of the corporation ; and as far as the corporation itself is concerned, it is a distinct person in law; and that consequently this 16th section, which says, that nothing herein contained shall extend to or interfere with the business of any legally qualified apothecary cannot possibly save the business of Apothe¬ caries’ Hall which is not and cannot be a legally qualified apothecary. Now that such a body as Apothecaries’ Hall cannot bring itself within section 3 by registration appears, I think, abundantly plain, not only from the provisions with regard to registration, not only from the provisions which regulate the details in which registration is to be effected, but also by the consequence of registration, because one of the numerous consequences of registration is that every person appearing on the register is to be eligible to be a member of the Pharmaceutical Society, and there are further provisions which entitle him to be elected an associate of the Pharmaceutical Society. Then it goes on : — “ Every person who at the time of the passing of this Act is or has been in business on his own account as a chemist and druggist as aforesaid and who shall be registered as a chemist and druggist shall be eligible to be elected and continue a member of the Pharmaceutical Society according to the bye-laws thereof ; but no person shall in right of membership acquired pursuant to this clause be placed on the register of pharmaceutical chemists, nor, save as is hereinafter expressly provided, be eligible for election to the Council of the Pharmaceutical Society.” Now, inasmuch as those sections of that clause apply to every person that is registered, it shows that corporations cannot be amongst every person who may be registered; consequently it shows that such a body as Apothecaries’ Hall could not bring itself within the section, and by registration enable itself to carry on its business as having been a person who at the time of the passing of the Act carried on business. Now, my lords, can there be a more complete reductio ad absurdum than to suppose that the Act of Parliament meant to put a stop to the sale of poisons, and therefore incidentally to the dispensing of medicines, by the body in England most qualified and most fit in every sense to carry on such a business, the place to which everybody sends if they want to have their prescriptions properly made up with perfect certainty of being right ? Lord Watson: The most serious difficulty that Mr. Benjamin’s argument raised on this part of the case was this, that if your construction of the statute were correct, a corporation can never be obnoxious to one of the several penalties imposed by section 15. The conten¬ tion is, and I think it seems well founded, that any individual, no matter what number of qualified assistants he has, is liable in a penalty if there are found in his open shop poisonous drugs for the purpose of sale ; but a corporation may keep any quantity of poisonous drugs for the purpose of sale, with unqualified assistants, and that corporation can commit no statutory offence ; and no body can commit a statutory offence on their premises until there is an actual sale. Mr. Wills : It is impossible to deny that. That con¬ sequence has been admitted throughout. It points to this, that for one clause or so you have unforeseen circumstances to deal with ; but the Act of Parliament 98 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [July 31, 1880. I submit was framed without any reference to a corpo¬ ration and corporations were not thought of. This expression about keeping open shop was thrown in, as it were, by a kind of process of supererogation, something thrown in over and above, having dealt with the sale, which was essential for the safety of the public. I imagine that what was present to the mind of the person who framed this section 1, when he was drawing that section, was not the case of a person who had an assistant at all ; but he was thinking in his own mind of an individual carrying on business and selling, without the question of an assistant being present to his mind. Lord Watson: He must have had in view the differ¬ ence between selling and keeping open shop. r. Wills: Then this occurred to him: — Well, there may perhaps be a question as to whether sales have actually been effected, and I may as well throw in — inasmuch as the intention is that sales of poisons should be prohibited except by a qualified person — an expression about keeping open shop ; it will do no harm, the same people are intended. A man cannot keep an open shop unless he does sell. Unless he sells as well as keeps an open shop, there is no harm done ; the prohibition would do no harm, and the same people will be hit in each case. And, inasmuch as what was present to the mind of the person who drew that section was nothing but a natural person, it did not occur to him that there was any reason to draw any kind of distinction in the language. Lord Watson : It has a much wider application. Ap¬ parently it is keeping a shop open for the sale of a par¬ ticular commodity ; because, in the one case, all that the prosecutor has to prove in order to entitle him to the penalty, is that there was an open shop, and that in the shop there were certain articles presumably for sale ; that is enough. In the other case he must prove the actual sale. Of course, he could do that by going in and pur¬ chasing. Mr. Wills : So long as you are dealing with the case of natural persons, really the distinction of the person keeping an open shop is perfectly immaterial, because the person only keeps the open shop for the purpose of sale, and only keeps an open shop for the purpose of effecting repeated sales. Lord Blackburn : It is to facilitate proof, I apprehend. I suppose as soon as the officer of the Pharmaceutical Society were to go down to a small shop in a little village that the people would at once say they were selling cheese, or bread, or something of that sort ; and that if he asked them to sell him a pennyworth of arsenic, they would of course say “no.” Therefore it was to facilitate proof. Mr. Wills : What I was pointing out is that so long as we are dealing with the case only of the individual person, as far as that person is concerned it is quite immaterial. Lord Blackburn: If that was their object, to facilitate proof, there was no intention to deal with a corporation ; because a corporation keeping shop would hardly be within that difficulty ; but if your adversaries are right in saying, as Mr. Justice Mellor did, that one of the inten¬ tions was that the profits of the trade should be confined to qualified persons, ot course, that is a very different story. Mr. Wills : Of course, my lord. All I have to say is that the recital of the Act does not suggest that to my mind, and I submit to your lordship it is an unauthorized and an unreasonable inference from anything pointed out in the Act. The Lord Chancellor : Can you tell me — I do not know that it is very material — whether a man would continue committing a series of offences for each of which £5 could be recovered, if he kept an open shop and did not shut it up, or whether it would be one single offence, for which he would be fined £5 once for all ? Mr. Wills : I should think every day, and I do not confine myself to a day. The Lord Chancellor : Every minute, every hour, or what ? Mr. Wills : I should think so. I should think you might draw a line at any particular moment. You might say, “Up to that moment has he kept an open shop ? Yes, he has.” Lord Blackburn : There is something analogous in the Act of Charles II., imposing a penalty on exercising a lawful trade on a Sunday. It has been held that the baker who had sold one loaf had freed himself for the day. Lord Watson : I think there is a case under the Inland Revenue Act, where there is a penalty inflicted for not entering spirits under a permit to a retail dealer. I think it was held there in an English Court that although the statute provided for daily entries, the dealer was entitled to make the day’s entries at one time. They held that the penalty was only applicable from day to day for each day. Mr. Wills : I suppose that would be because, according to a reasonable course of business, he would have the evening to make up his books. Lord Watson: Probably here they would hold it was an open shop from the time he opened it until the time he shut it. Mr. Wills : I should think in strictness you might draw the line at any moment and say that for any perceptible interval between that time and any other time he was liable. The Lord Chancellor : It would be a reasonable thing, if he got a notice in the afternoon that he was proceeding illegally, and he removed all those drugs at night, and did not put them in the shop the next morning. It would be rather unreasonable to fine him as many times as there were hours in the day. Mr. Wills : It certainly is a continuing offence. The Lord Chancellor : It would be as often as a shop is opened and shut, at all events. Mr. Wills : Every fresh act of taking down the shutters with the intention of keeping them down for the purpose of inviting the public go in and buy. The Lord Chancellor : It would be a new keeping of an open shop. Lord Blackburn : I do not think it would be inflicted. The Lord Chancellor : I only asked the question be¬ cause there is that point. It looks very much like an adjunct to facilitate proof. Mr. Wills : However, my lord, I do not feel myself severely pressed by the argument, that there may be possibly some sections which point to an uncompleted cycle of legislation and to a piece of legislation which is not harmonious in all its details by reason of the con¬ struction which we seek to put upon it. In other cases you have anomalous results. It is an anomaly if there is something which would be an offence if committed by an individual, and which would bring an indi¬ vidual under liability under the sections in question, and which cannot be committed by a corporation, or does not bring the corporation within the words of the Act of Parliament. That is an anomaly. On the other hand, surely it would be a much greater anomaly to suppose that the Legislature, without saying it, has intended to prohibit the dealing in drugs of this kind altogether by joint stock companies, and a greater anomaly still to suppose that the Legislature intended to shut out the Apothecaries’ Hall from dispensing drugs and selling poisons. What seems to me to be conclusive, if I may venture to say so, is that no one can think that it is seriously conceivable that if those who framed this Act; and those who passed it, had thought of the case of a corporation, they would not have made some natural pro¬ vision applicable to the case of a corporation for enabling corporations to carry on their business with safety to the public, and without violating any kind of clauses which were reasonably intended for the protection of the public. You must suppose, if you are to adopt the July 31, 18S0.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS, 99 construction of my learned friends, that the Legislature either intended by a side wind to close all corporate energy and enterprise in this department, or that per incuriam it has done so. My lords, I submit that either of these circumstances is one which any Court dealing with this Act of Parliament would be reasonably anxious to escape from, and that it would feel itself justified in adopting any reasonable construction which would avoid it. My lords, it is remarkable, and it is a matter which formed part of my argument in the Court below, and will form part of my argument before your lordships, that where a general and universal prohibition is intended, and when it is applicable to everbody, in the 17th section, the language is altered. I do not know whether that was done on purpose, or whether it was simply accidental, but so it is. That section 17, as far as the first enactment in it is concerned, is universal. There are qualifying words, which my friend read, in the latter part of the section applying to wholesale dealers ; but they do not touch this first part of it which makes it unlawful to sell any poison, either by wholesale or retail, unless the box or bottle be distinctly labelled with the name of the article — of the poison — and the name and address of the seller. Lord Blackburn : That bears internal evidence of being an afterthought. In the former sections of the Act it is said the penalties should be recovered in the county court ; but here there is a clause in which they have not only altered the word, but in which, without any reason for it which I can see, it says “ It shall be recovered before two justices.” Mr. Wills : Anyhow, there it is. You cannot argue as to the construction of the clause from it ; because the clauses are in different language. Clause 17 alters the language, and in express terms made it a general pro¬ hibition. Of course, if the Act of Parliament had said in clause 1 and clause 15 “from and after the 31st December it shall be unlawful to keep open shop for retailing,” etc., there would be an end to the matter. If that had been the thing, then my friends would have been well founded in saying : There is a general prohibi¬ tion in express terms and you cannot bring yourself within the exception. But here there is no general prohibition. Lord Blackburn : A very slight alteration in the language would do it. Mr. Wills: It would ; but it would be very important. Lord Blackburn : If it were in these words “ shall not be lawful to keep open shop unless by a person duly qualified,” that would be clearly nugatory. Mr. Wills : They have not said that. If they had said that, nobody could have doubted what was intended by the general prohibition. But here, too, as it seems to me, the general purview of the Act and the constant use of the word “ person ” from the beginning to the end of this Act indicate that the person who framed it and the Legislature who adopted it, did not think of a corporate existence when it was passing this Act and never thought of dealing with it. Can you suppose that the Legislature really meant in dealing with an enterprise of this kind to establish — I do not want to use a word which carries with it a thought of prejudice ; nothing is further from my meaning — but can it be supposed that the Legislature really intended to establish a special class of persons to whom the dealings in these things should be confined. I submit to your lordships it is impossible so to hold or so to suppose, and I really do not think anything could be gained by going over the whole ground again and again. The judgments of the Court below are very familiar to your lordships by this time. In the judg¬ ments in the Court of Queen’s Bench — certainly in the Chief Justice’s judgment — there is, I venture to submit a want of distinction between the position of individuals and of corporate existences in which the individual is merged as soon as there is corporate existence ; and, as it seems te me, it is quite idle to suggest that the applica¬ tion of this statute could possibly be affected by the fact that the individual corporators, the individual members of the limited company, were or were not, any one of them or every one of them, persons qualified to be pharma¬ ceutical chemists under the Act. The remainder of the judgment deals with a contention which was never mine, and which I humbly submit I ought not to be saddled with, namely, that supposed contention that it was im¬ possible for a corporate existence either to commit an indictable offence or an offence punishable on summary conviction. I said in the Court of Appeal that I never dreamt of advancing such a proposition as that. 1 must have been very much misunderstood, and my language must have been very unfortunate if it gave rise to any such supposition. One has been too familiar in one’s own practice by this time with the hundreds of cases almost which one has argued before the very Court of Queen’s Bench, in which there have been convictions of limited bodies carrying on trades ; where this, that, or the other offence has been under consideration. And the cases in which actions have been brought, in which railway companies have been indicted for obstructing highways, are so numerous that ‘one must give the go-bye to all one’s experience to make such a contention as that; and although a very large portion of the Attorney-General’s argument in the Court of Appeal and in the Court of Queen’s Bench was directed to dealing with the proposi¬ tion, yet I venture to say it is one I never made and am not concerned to support. What I have to support is that every part of this Act shows that the very utmost that can be said is, that this particular case of a corpora¬ tions is a casus omissus , and not that the Legislature ever intended to or has by a side wind effected that extra¬ ordinary revolution of our notions and brought about that result, the result, namely, of putting a stop at once to corporate enterprise in this class of transactions and shut out the Apothecaries’ Hall also. Let me call your lordships’ attention to this observation which arises, I think, very legitimately on the Act. I said that the keeping an open shop was a thing, as it were, thrown in supplementary, that it was not really the gist of the pro¬ tection required. The real gist of the protection required being to prevent the sale, and the preventing the keeping open shop being only ancillary to that, being in an ordinary case an easy way of getting at it where you cannot prove perhaps that the sale has been so effected. The Lord Chancellor : There is a little difficulty there in the preamble. It states the offence to be keeping an open shop. Mr. Wills: Yes, my lord; but even there it is only ancillary to the sale. It is not the keeping open shop, it is keeping the. open shop because things are sold there and will be sold there if the open shop is kept. If you can satisfactorily prevent the sale, it does not matter a bit whether the open shop is kept or not ; but it is the sale which is the real danger. And one observation which arises, with which I intend to conclude what I have to say, as showing that the real danger intended to be dealt with is that of selling by unqualified people, is that where a chemist or druggist dies, so long as the estate in which his relatives are interested remains open and is not wound up, so long is it competent for wholly unqualified people to carry on the business by means of qualified assistants. The Lord Chancellor : But then it is said that in that case the Legislature expressly desired qualified assistants which it has omitted to do in the case of a corporation ; and, therefore, corporations cannot carry on the business. Mr. Wills : Well, my lord, I should submit that is a very strong argument for saying that the Legislature did not think of corporations, otherwise they would have made an analogous provision in the case of a corporation, especi¬ ally in the case of a corporation, if such there were, which was already existing. But if the danger to the public consisted in the keeping open shop by unqualified persons — if that were the real gist of the danger — then the un¬ qualified persons ought not to be permitted to keep them 100 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [July 31, 1880 for a day ; because nobody can say that the mere preser¬ vation of a personal interest shall or ought to be put in competition with securing the safety of the public. I submit that that very fact that that has been provided for and that no provision has been made in the case of corporate bodies is a very strong ground for saying that corporate bodies were omitted, not because it was sup¬ posed that they were dealt with by the word “person,” or because that was intended, but because their case never was present to the mind of the Legislature, which is another way of saying that their case is not included and that their essence is not included in the word “person.” [Adjourned for a short time.] Mr. Einlay : My lords, I am with Mr. Wills, and pro¬ pose to add but few words on behalf of the respondents. The proposition for which the respondents contend is that, if the statute provides it shall be unlawful to do a particular thing unless in compliance with a particular condition and that condition be one with which in the nature of things an artificial person, a corporation, cannot comply, the word ‘ ‘ person ” in that statute shall be read as applying only to natural persons. The Lord Chancellor: Just state that proposition over again. Mr. Finlay: If the statute provides that a person shall not do a particular thing except on condition of his complying with a certain proviso with which it is impos¬ sible for any except natural persons to comply, the word “ person ” in such statute should be read as applying only to natural persons. Lord Blackburn: Unless the context and the object of the Legislature is such as to clearly show the contrary. Mr. Finlay : Certainly. If there were anything in the context which intended that the enactment was to be read in the more general sense, I should not contend for the proposition ; but what I submit, my lords, should be held to be the law is this, that in the absence of any¬ thing in the context or object of the Act clearly indicat¬ ing the contrary intention, the exception is one applicable to natural persons only, that the rule is only intended to apply to natural persons. There have been cases which have been refereed to in the course of the argument, by Lord Blackburn, where the law with reference to the meaning of the word “person” was certainly carried to a point for which we certainly should not contend. By a statute relating to evidence of forgery in Harrison’s case, which is referred to in 1st Leach’s Crown Cases, it was held that the word “ person ” did not extend to the Bank of England as being a corporation. Lord Blackburn : In these cases it is tried before twelve judges and if they all agreed the mind would be contented ; but it does not by any means follow that the majority held it. It would be probable enough if one of them doubted. Mr. Finlay : The facts are stated in East’s Pleas of the Crown, 2nd vol., page 988, where I find this passage. “Harrison was indicted for forging a receipt under the statute 7 George II. which makes it felony to forge such receipt with intent to defraud any person. Some of the counts in the indictment laid the offence to be with intent to defraud the London Assurance Company and the Bank of England alternately. It was objected that a company or corporation was not a person : and that the Legislature had so decided by passing the statute 31 George II., c. 22, s. 78, which, after reciting that doubts had arisen whether the word ‘ person ’ in the statute 2 George II. c. 25, extended to corporations or companies enacted, that they who were convicted of the offences in that statute should have the same punishment, if they committed them against a company or corporation, as if against any person ; but it did not mention the offences comprised in the statute 7 George II. The Court reserved this point for the opinion of all the judges, who decided in favour of the prisoner, and he was discharged.” Shortly after the statute was passed to remedy this defect. Lord Blackburn : That would not be a private matter, but probably it was the Home Secretary who was sent to by the advice of the judges, and would have probably granted a pardon. I think it is rather too much to say that is a decision. Mr. Finlay : It is not necessary for the respondents to contend for any proposition so wide as that case would involve, if that case indeed amounted to a decision ; but, in looking at the meaning of the word “ person ” in this Act, it is of course material to look at the Act for it. This Act is passed for the purpose of amending the Act of 1852. Now the Act of 1852, 15 and 16 Viet., chap. 56, begins by reciting — “ Whereas it is expedient for the safety of the public, that persons exercising the business or calling of pharmaceutical chemists in Great Britain should possess a competent practical knowledge of phar¬ maceutical and general chemistry, and other branches of useful knowledge : and whereas certain persons, desirous of advancing chemistry and pharmacy, and of promoting an uniform system of educating those who should practise the same, formed themselves into a Society called ‘ The Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain,’ which Society was on the 18th day of February, 1843, incorporated by Royal Charter whereby it was provided that the said Society should consist of members who should be chemists and druggists, who were or had been established on their own account at the date of the said charter, or who should have been examined in such manner as the Council of the said Society should deem proper, or who should have been certified to be duly qualified for admission, or who should be persons elected as superintendents by the Council of the said Society. And whereas it is expedient to prevent ignorant and incompetent persons from assuming the title of or pretending to be pharma¬ ceutical chemists or pharmaceutists in Great Britain, or members of the said Pharmaceutical Society, and to that end it is desirable that all persons before assuming such title should be duly examined as to their skill and knowledge by competent persons, and that a register should be kept by some legally authorized officer of all such persons.” Then the 12th seetion pro¬ vides that “ after the passing of this Act, it shall not be lawful for any person, not being duly registered as a pharmaceutical chemist, according to the provisions of this Act, to assume or use the title of pharmaceutical chemist or pharmaceutist, in any part of Great Britain, or to assume, use or exhibit any name, title or sign, implying that he is registered under this Act, or that he is a member of the said Society ; and if any person, not being duly registered under this Act, shall assume or use the title of pharmaceutical chemist or pharmaceutist, or shall use, assume or exhibit any name, title or sign implying that he is a person registered under this Act, or that he is a member of the said Society, every such person shall be liable to a penalty of £5 ; ” and it pro¬ vides for such a penalty. Now, my lords, that Act pro¬ vides against acts which it can hardly be supposed that a corporation was likely to commit in order to be a member of the Pharmaceutical Society. Then it was thought in the year 1868 that merely a preventing of persons who had not been examined from following this trade as pharmaceu¬ tical chemists or as members of the Society was not quite enough ; and it had been by way of extending the prohi¬ bition to certain other acts that the statute now in ques¬ tion was passed. That provides that after a certain date “ it shall be unlawful for any person to sell or keep open shop for retailing, dispensing or compounding poisons, or to assume or use the title ‘chemist and druggist,’ or ‘che¬ mist,’ or ‘ druggist,’ or ‘ pharmacist,’ or ‘ dispensing che¬ mist,’ or ‘ druggist,’ in any part of Great Britain, unless such person shall be a pharmaceutical chemist, or a chemist and druggist within the meaning of this Act, and be registered under this Act.” Now when your lordships find that the Act for the purpose of amending which this statute of 1868 is passed is an Act which in the nature of things dealt with what might be done by July 31, lS^O.J THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 101 natural persons only, the presumption is that the amending Act is intended to deal with the same class of persons ; and when in the 1st section it is found that the condition imposed upon persons who are to keep open shop is a condition which only natural persons can comply with, we submit to your lordships that the Act should be read as applying to natural persons only. Suppose there had been in former days an Act that no person should carry on a certain business unless he had taken the oath of allegiance, it would have been a very strong thing to say that such an Act was to have had the effect of excluding all corporations from carrying on the business mentioned in that statute. Lord Blackburn : Such a hypothetical Act would have been rather more hard to construe than the present one. Mr. Finlay : Each case one puts is merely an illustra¬ tion of the proposition which we advance for your lordships’ approval, that if the condition is one which only the natural persons can comply with, the reasonable way of reading the prohibition it places on persons unless they comply with the condition is to say that only natural persons were intended to be dealt with. Then, my lords, only one word more with reference to the second question which has been mentioned in the course of the case with reference to keeping open shop. My friend, Mr. Benjamin, on Tuesday mentioned the case of Reynard v. Chase, which is reported in the 1st Burrows, at the beginning of the volume, p. 2. The statute on which that case was decided was not then at hand ; but I have it here. It is the 5th Elizabeth, chap. 4, sec. 31 : — “ After the first day of May next coming it shall not be lawful for any person or persons, other than such as now do lawfully use or exercise any art, mystery, or manual occupation, to set up, occupy, use, or exercise any craft, mystery, or occupa¬ tion now used or occupied within the realm of England or Wales, except he shall have been brought up therein seven years at least as an apprentice in manner and form abovesaid.” So that the prohibition there is against setting-up, occupying, using, or exercising any craft, mystery, or occupation, and in the case of Reynard v. Chace it was held that one not qualified to exercise the trade himself by having served an apprenticeship, by entering into partnership with a qualified person, and only sharing the profits, without interfering in the trade, is not within the statute of Elizabeth, chap. 4. The Lord Chancellor : Where is Reynard v. Chase ? Mr. Finlay : In 1st Burrows, p. 2. Mr. Benjamin : It is the first case Lord Mansfield ever decided. Lord Blackburn : That is under the statute of Elizabeth with reference to apprenticeship. The question there raised was whether within the meaning of that Act a sleeping partner in fact required to have an apprenticeship as well as the other. Mr. Finlay : I mentioned the case because it was assumed by my friend in argument as incontestable that one individual, a member of the firm of chemists and druggists, who was not qualified, would be liable to a penalty for keeping open shop. The Lord Chancellor : The Lord Chief Justice seems to have assumed that. Mr. Finlay : Yes, my lord. The case of Reynard v. Chase, which is here, certainly seems to be an authority to the contrary. The words, of course, are not iden¬ tical. Lord Blackburn: Where breweries had been carried on by a deceased person, and the Court of Chancery had ordered the business to be carried on by the next of kin, for the benefit of the estate, it would be a question whether the Court of Chancery or the next of kin would be amenable to that. Mr. Finlay: What Lord Mansfield says is this: — “Let us consider whether the present case be within the letter, or even the meaning of this Act. The general policy of the Act was to have trades carried on by persons who had skill in them. Now here the personal skill of the defendant makes no real difference in the case, for the person who is skilful acts everything, and receives no directions from this man ; he neither did, nor was to interfere. The case of Hobbs v. Young is not parallel. There the defendant, a single man, directed the whole trade ; was the master ; and directed all the servants. As between master and servant, no doubt that it is the master who carries on the trade and not the servant. But in Hobbs v. Young there was no partnership; nor (what is the distinguishing character of the present case) a mere naked sharing of the profits, and risking a proportion of the loss ; without his acting or directing at all, in any manner whatsoever. In many considerable undertakings, it is absolutely necessary to take in persons as partners, to share the profits and risk the loss. And the general usage and practice of mankind ought to have weight in determina¬ tions of this sort, affecting trade and commerce, and the manner of carrying of them on. It is notorious that many partnerships are entered into, upon the foundation of one partner contributing industry and skill, and the other money. Many great breweries and other trades have been carried on for the benefit of infants and residuary legatees, under the direction of the Court of Chancery. Now if the plaintiff’s construction was to hold, the whole direction and decree of the Court of Chancery was contrary to law and to an express Act of Parliament. So it is likewise practised in other great trades. The late Mr. Child directed his business of a banker to be carried on for the benefit of his children and other persons. Many other instances might be mentioned. It would introduce the utmost confusion in affairs of trade and commerce if this construction should prevail. On the other hand, I see no inconvenience ; it is exactly the same thing as to the trade, in every iota, ‘whether this partner has or has not served an apprentice¬ ship.’ ” The Lord Chancellor : I think some parts of that judgment lay stress on some special stipulation. Mr. Child’s executors seemed (to go further ; but I suppose executors there would not themselves have been apprentices any more than the cestui que trusts. Mr. Finlay: No, my lord. Of course I feel on this part of the case an observation may be made on the other side that the proviso in the 16th section in favour of executors would be unnecessary, unless the conduct of the business by a qualified person on behalf of the execu¬ tor, who did not personally interfere, would otherwise have been keeping an open shop by the executor. But, perhaps it is a fair observation that that proviso may have been introduced by way of greater caution, and to make things quite safe in the case of executors and repre¬ sentatives of a deceased pharmaceutical chemist ; that proviso was inserted, but it does not necessarily follow from the fact of that proviso being inserted that keeping open shop is an offence committed by anyone who does not actually take part in it. The Act recites that it was expedient that persons keeping an open shop should possess a practical knowledge of the business. That is important only where the person on whose behalf the shop is kept actually takes part in it himself, so that it can be said that he keeps the shop himself. On these grounds, my lords, I think that the judgment of the Court of Appeal should be supported. The Lord Chancellor : In connection with this statute you referred to, may I ask — I am not quite sure how it is — but has it not been the custom in the city of London — I am not sure whether it is not in the Act of Parlia¬ ment which requires that properly licensed brokers shall carry on a broker’s business — to treat it as sufficient, if there is in a firm one such licensed broker ? Mr. Finlay : I do not feel able to answer your lord- ships question. The Lord Chancellor; Can you answer that question, Mr. Benjamin? Mr. Benjamin: I cannot, my lord. I only know that 102 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [July 51, 1* SO. the brokers of the City of London are a sort of chartered libertines, and that they carry on business in the name of a licensed man, though, perhaps, there are half a dozen interested in it. They use the name of a licensed broker. The Lord Chancellor : It was my impression that that is the way in which the law is understood. The business can only be carried on by a licensed broker ; but it is thought enough so there be a licensed broker in the firm who carries on the business. Lord Blackburn: There is a case in Measom and Welsby where I rather think the decision was that there was no infringement of the Act of Parliament, but only the infringement of a municipal regulation. Mr. Benjamin : I only propose to trouble your lord- ships on such points as have been raised by my learned friends, because I should take it to be unworthy of such a tribunal to repeat what I have said in my opening. Now, my lords, the first and principal argument of my friend, Mr. Wills, was this, that apparently on the face of the Act, the words “ keeping open shop ” were some¬ thing thrown in parenthetically, so to speak, and that the main offence was the offence of selling ; upon which your lordships, anticipating what I was about to say in answer to that, said, “ But the Pharmacy Act begins in its pre¬ amble by expressing that it is expedient for the safety of the public that persons keeping open shop for retailing and compounding poisons shall have a practical know¬ ledge.” It does not say a word about selling, which would lead one to suppose, and it so turns out that the supposi¬ tion is accurate, that the original Act had nothing about selling in it, the preamble having no reference to it. Accordingly I find — I have the whole series of the Bills as they were before Parliament — and I find the original Act was an Act exclusively confined to keeping open shop, and the word ‘ sale ’ was introduced afterwards. Lord Blackburn : Can we possibly construe an Act by the particular words which were put into it in the course of legislation ? Mr. Benjamin : When it is stated as a fact that these words were thrown in afterwards. Mr. Wills : I did not assert that as a fact. Mr. Benjamin : However, it answers my purpose com¬ pletely to say that the preamble shows that the Act as originally produced was to prohibit keeping open shop for the sale of poisons, and that the selling was not in the preamble stated as one of the objects; but you do find selling in the Act itself. Lord Watson: If the statute had been in accordance with the preamble, it would have afforded very little pro¬ tection to the public. A qualified person would have kept open shop and sold as much poison as he chose by means of an unqualified assistant. Mr. Benjamin : Therefore it became necessary not only to prohibit the keeping open shop, but of course it would occur to everyone that there was a great deal of positive convenience in prohibiting the sale of poisons to people — that there was a great deal of opium and other things of that sort sold, which would not be reached by a prohibition to keep open shop. Therefore the prohibition to sell was absolutely necessary for the purpose of the Act. I do not think, therefore, that it is possible to say that the provisions of the Act are mainly directed against the act of selling. The main thing is against keeping open shop ; but selling also is made an offence under certain circumstances. Now my friend says if, however, the purpose had been to make the selling unlawful, why was the language changed in the 17th section? That is a fair argument. You find the 17th section begins: It shall 'be unlawful to sell any poison without a particular label. This section says, my friend says, it shall be unlawful for any person to do so ; but why was it changed in the 17th section? It is now conceded that this 17th section does apply to corporations, and therefore the entire argument based on the fact that there are a large number of sections which do not apply to corporations when the word “person” is used, is com¬ pletely done away with and the argument disappears. But my friend says : Why change the language of sections 1 and 15 from the language of the 17th ? The language in the 17th is : It shall be unlawful to sell so-and-so ; and the language in section 1 : Is it shall be unlawful for any person to do so. Now, my lords, take this section, and leaving out the unnecessary words so as to get at the exact meaning of the phrase as used: “From and after the 31st December it shall be unlawful for any person to keep an open shop for retailing poisons unless such person be a pharmaceutical chemist and druggist within the meaning of the Act and be registered ” It is said that none but a natural person can be registered, ergo, it is lawful for a corporation to keep open shop for the sale of poisons, because the prohibition is levelled only against those who can pass an examination. But surely, my lord, when you come to see the purpose declared in the Act itself, that the purpose is to protect the public against keeping open shop for the sale of poisons, it is to make that the thing which is to be avoided ; that is the thing. Why declare the policy of the Act ? The policy of the Act is not to allow open shops to be kept, except by qualified persons. Then the 1st section says : “ No person shall keep an open shop for the sale of poisons except a qualified person,” because that is the meaning of it. Now as a corporation cannot be a qualified person, where is the difference in sense and in construction between the 1st and the 17th section, upon which my friends rely? Take the 1st section and put it in plain language, such as would be read and understood by an unlettered person, meaning thereby a layman, as we call him amongst us lawyers. “ Be it enacted that from and after the 31st day of December, 1868, it shall not be lawful to keep a shop open for the sale of poisons, except by a person duly qualified.” Is not that as much a general prohibition as the other ? Is not that really what is said ? After the 31st day of December no person, except a duly qualified person, shall keep open shop for the sale of poisons. Lord Watson : That is just the question, whether it is the same thing to prohibit the thing itself or to prohibit certain persons from doing it. Mr. Benjamin : Then, my lord, in order to settle that you must then see what the purpose of the Act was, and in looking at the purpose of the Act the Legislature tell you what their purpose is. They say it is expedient for the safety of the public that persons keeping open shop shall be duly qualified chemists. Lord Blackburn : Not exactly; “should possess a com¬ petent practical knowledge of pharmaceutical and general chemistry; and other branches of useful knowledge.” Mr. Benjamin: Substantially the idea is the same. The Legislature tell you the purpose is to protect the lives of the subjects of Her Majesty from being exposed to danger by buying poisons. Therefore they provide against keeping open shops. That is the purpose of the Act, to provide against keeping open shops for the sale of poisons. Now that being the policy of the Act, and that view being declared to be accomplished by the declaration that this keeping open shop for the sale of poisons shall be only by persons duly qualified, the question is whether they meant all persons. Lord Watson : You must not leave out those im¬ portant words, the remedy proposed for the mischief, that all persons shall be examined. Does not “ all persons ” include all such persons who are referred to before ? Mr. Benjamin: My lord, I rely on that instead of leaving it out, with submission to your lordship. The purpose is that nobody shall sell except persons that shall be examined. Corporations cannot be examined, ergo, corporations shall not sell. That is our argument. The Legislature say : “ Our purpose is that no shop shall be kept open except by duly qualified persons.” Corpora¬ tions cannot be duly qualified persons under the Act, therefore we say corporations cannot sell. The other July 31, 1880.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 103 side say: The Act says that none but duly qualified persons can keep open shop, and inasmuch as corpora¬ tions cannot be duly qualified persons they are not within the Act. Which of those carries out the purpose of the Legislature? The 17th section clearly, as regards certain provisions of the Act as to the sale of poisons, is applicable to corporations. The 15th, 16th and 17th follow each other. The 15th speaks of persons selling poisons who are not duly qualified and on the register. The 16th says what those persons are, and the 17th says if bottles and boxes are wrapped up in any other than a particular way, that shall be an offence. Now why shall not these three be read together; and if you so read them together, unquestionably the 17th, which is the third, referring to the ether two, can you adopt the other two and bring the thr.e within the prohibition of the kind named ? Lord Watson : You cannot read them together, because in the first place, even according to your own view, they include all qualified persons. It is not a question of qualification or disqualification. No person, qualified or unqualified, can sell except he complies with those con¬ ditions. Mr. Benjamin: You have an open shop, and the 17th section provides how the business of the open shop is to be conducted. Lord Watson : It goes a long way beyond the open shop — in a warehouse, or elsewhere. Mr. Benjamin: No doubt ; but it does include an open shop, and it includes a corporation as acting in the way pointed out in that Act, as constituting the offence. My friend, Mr. Finlay, opened his remarks with a general proposition, which I think very fairly stated the question, and which brings us right back to the inquiry to which I have just directed your lordships’ attention. He says, their proposition is that where only natural persons can comply with a condition under which it is lawful to keep open a shop for the sale of poisons, there the whole section must be construed as having reference to natural persons; but he adds that it cannot have reference to corporations, because they cannot comply with the conditions. Now I say, my lords, that that proposition cannot be maintained ; that there are numerous cases in which particular privileges of practising or doing acts are allowed by law to certain classes of persons who can comply with certain conditions, and that it is a false conclusion, a false inference to draw from that premise, that because other persons cannot comply with those conditions, therefore they may do the thing without complying with them. It is just the reverse of a fair inference, according to my views. Lord Watson : This would shut out not only all the female sex — I do not think they are within the charter and the Act of Parliament? Mr. Benjamin : Oh yes, my lord, we have many female practitioners who have received their diplomas. There is no doubt about that. Besides which, “ persons ” would always include the two sexes. It has been held that politically the word “ person ” does not extend to females, but we have ladies members of our Society. Our con¬ tention is this : — If the Legislature says we do not want open shops to be kept for the sale of poisons except by really qualified persons, we say, you therefore cannot keep it, because you cannot be duly qualified. Lord Watson : I do not doubt that. Ido not think it is controverted, if the Legislature have said that. Mr. Benjamin : That is substantially what they have said. Lord Blackburn : If you can show from the nature of it that the Legislature really meant that the form of words would do it. But you assume the Legislature have said that, and you change the form of words. Mr. Benjamin : My lords, I only say that because of what they have said is the purpose of the Act. Lord Blackburn : You rest on the preamble. Mr. Benjamin: Yes, my lord, I rest on the preamble. My friend has referred to Harrison’s case in the first Leach. But, my lord, that case proves nothing. The facts were these. There were two successive Acts of Parliament making criminal the offence of forgery to the detriment of any person or persons. I do not say I am using the exact words, but that was the substance of them ; and doubts were entertained whether, under the word person or persons, corporations were included. Parliament then passed an Act, by which it said that corporations were included in the first of the second Acts, but did not say anything about the construction of the second Act. Then a prosecution having been brought forward under the second Act it was argued, Parliament has had this matter under consideration, and it has de - cided that “person” or “persons” means corporations in the first of these two Acts ; but it has not said it is so in the second, therefore the fair inference is that in the second it means natural persons. Lord Blackburn : Surely that is very bad reasoning. The construction would be as it was before. Mr. Benjamin : I am stating the fact, my lord, not maintaining an argument. Under those circumstances the Court held they could not hold that the second Act applied to corporate bodies as well as to individuals, because Parliament had not connected the two Acts at the same time, or rather, having the two before it had only dealt with one, and thereupon a second Act was passed for the second. Lord Blackburn : I rather think you are stating the case too highly. It does not appear that anything of the sort was held. It was only that the result was that there should be a second argument ; for it was never bad, for in the interim the Government made up their mind to pardon the man, and passed a new Act. Mr. Benjamin: That would rather strengthen the view of the case I am putting before your lordships. Now, my lords, we come to the case of Reynard v. Chase. That case applies to a partnership, and says that where the law has made it illegal for a person to carry on a business who has not gone through the apprenticeship required by the statute, that person may take another into partner¬ ship with him and may continue the original trade if the silent partner takes no part in it at all. But in that very case my friend overlooked the fact that his lordship, Lord Mansfield, distinguished it from a former case in which there was no paitner, and then he said the whole business was not the business of the servant, Longmore, as stated in the statement of facts here. But it is the business of the master, and consequently a business conducted by the defendant company, whether right or wrong, whether lawful or unlawful, is a business conducted by the master who is unqualified. Longmore is merely a servant who obeys the order of the master ; and Longmore’s quali¬ fication cannot give a qualification to the master. The master, as an individual, would be vio’ating the Act ; and the whole question is whether the Legislature have drawn an Act in such a fashion that if a single individual conducting this business on his own responsi¬ bility would unquestionably be committing an unlawful Act — if all the members conducting this business, each one of them in an ordinary partnership, they would be doing unlawful acts; but because the Government says by charter of corporation under the Companies Act, 1862, they may carry on business, that enables them to defy the Act of Parliament, and carry on the business which other¬ wise they could not carry on. I apprehend as to the danger to the public it is just the same. The Lord Chancellor: I see Mr. Serjeant Hill was very angry with the decision in Reynard v. Chase, from the two notes of his, one at the beginning and the other at the end. Mr. Benjamin : Mr. Burrows in reporting it says it is not a good decision. The Lord Chancellor : I think you are referring to the note of Serjeant Hill. In the advertisement to Burrows, in the edition I have in my hand, it was said that the publishers have in their possession a copy of these reports 101 THE PHARMAJEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [July 31, 1880. which belonged to the late Serjeant Hill, and have ventured to add to this edition a variety of valuable notes, etc., which he had made in his copy, and which are now for the first time presented to the public. These will be found at the bottom of the page in the shape of notes, or in the margin enclosed in brackets. At the bottom of page 2 is the first of the notes I have referred to, and that is repeated again. I mean there is another note of the same character at page 9, and both of them I assume are notes of Serjeant Hill, judging from that advertisement. Mr. Benjamin : My lord, I had seen the notes, and I thought they were notes of the editor. I had not seen the passage your lordship has read, stating that they were Serjeant Hlil’s notes. Lord Blackburn : It is not likely that Sir S. Burrows would have said anything against a decision of Lord Mansfield. Was Serjeant Hill a counsel in the case? Mr. Benjamin : I believe not. The Lord Chancellor : It must be the first case Lord Mansfield decided. Lord Blackburn: If Serjeant Hill was a counsel in the case it would hardly be judicious for him to dispute the judgment. } The Lord Chancellor: I do not think he was. Mr. Benjamin : I really do not think, in this case Reynard v. Chase adds anything to the argument of the appellant. The Lord Chancellor: On the whole I should be inclined to think, as far as the specific question was concerned, taking Reynard v. Chase and Hobbs v. Young together, the bearing is rather in your favour that other¬ wise, as far as it goes. Judgment. The Lord Chancellor : My lords, I cannot say that thi case appears to me to be one free from difficulty, especi¬ ally as we have two Courts of high authority differing from each other, the Lord Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Mellor having taken the view of the statute for which the appellants contend, and the Court of Appeal the opposite view. My lords, the question really comes to be one upon the construction of particular words in the 1st and 15th sections of this statute, having regard to the general prin¬ ciples on which ambiguous words such as “person” ought to be construed. There can be no question that the word “person” may, and I should be disposed myself to say pmmd facie it does, include in a public statute a person in law, that is a corporation as well as a natural person; but it is never to be forgotten that although that is a sense which the word will bear in law, and as I said perhaps should be attributed to it in the construction of such a document as a statute, unless there be any reason for a contrary construction, yet, that in its popular sense and ordinary use it would hardly extend so far. There¬ fore, as statutes like other -documents are constantly conceived according to the popular use of language, it is probable, and may be taken to be certain, that the word is often used in statutes in a sense in which it cannot be intended to extend to a corporation, and that accounts for the frequent occurrence in some statutes, in interpre¬ tation clauses, of an express declaration that it shall ex¬ tend to a body politic or corporate, and in other statutes, of which an example will be found in one cited during the argument by Mr. Benjamin, I mean the Act as to apothe¬ caries, in which there will be found clauses which say, as in that instance, that remedies by persons who complain of acts done under colour of the authority of the Act, or in pursuance of it, must be prosecuted within a certain limit of time against all persons or bodies politic or corporate, which upon the face of the Act shows that corporations were con¬ templated. Now, I hold that with some qualification the language used by the junior counsel for the respondents is substantially right, that if a statute provides that a person shall not do a particular act, except on condition of his com¬ plying with a certain proviso, primd facie it is the natural and reasonable construction of such a statute, unless there be something in the context, or in the manifest object of the statute, or in the nature of the subject matter to exclude it — primd facie I say it is the natural and reason¬ able construction of such a clause that by the use of the word “person” the Legislature contemplates one of a class of persons who may or may not do the act, or who are capable of doing the act, the doing of which is to take them out of the scope of the provision. Now, if that be a sound observation, it appears to be decisive of this case when we look to the language of the 1st and 15th sec- tions. The 1st section, merely transposing the place in which certain words are used, is this : — “ From and after the 31st day of December, 1863, it shall be unlawful for any person, unless such person be a pharmaceutical chemist or chemist and druggist within the meaning of this Act, and be registered under this Act,” to do certain things. Primd facie that contemplates a class of persons who may or may not be pharmaceutical chemists or chemists and druggists within the meaning of the Act, and be registered under the Act. What class of persons can be such pharmaceutical chemists or chemists and. druggists, and be registered? Can a corporation, or can it not ? My lords, I think it clear upon the sequel of the Act that a corporation cannot be so. A corporation certainly, looking to the former Phar¬ macy Act, cannot be a pharmaceutical chemist, nor can it be a chemist and druggist within the meaning of this Act, and be registered under this Act ; because the 3rd clause says : — “ Chemists and druggists wkhin the meaning of this Act shall consist of all persons, who, at any time before the passing of this Act, have carried on in Great Britain the business of a chemist and druggist in the keeping of open shop for the compounding of the prescriptions of duly qualified medical practitioners.5'' That indeed might have applied to a corporation if a cor¬ poration could be registered. But then with regard to that class of persons who had previously carried on such a business, the 5th section requires them to be registered, and in order to registry requires a claim to be made by a notice in writing, signed by the person, which notice is to be in the form set forth in the schedule. I do not see myself that it is possible to suppose that the Legis¬ lature contemplated that anyone but a person who could sign the claim was to be registered under those clauses. In addition, I find in the 18th section, this is ex¬ pressly provided : — “ Every person who at the time of the passing of this Act is or has been in business on his own account as a chemist and druggist, and who shall be registered as a chemist and druggist, shall be eligible to be elected and continue a member of the Phar¬ maceutical Society according to the bye-laws thereof.” That appears to me plainly to show that the Legislature enforced and required the registration of persons who before the Act carried on business as chemists and drug¬ gists in a sense applicable onty to those who could become members of the Pharmaceutical Society, in other words, only to individual persons. With regard to those Who should afterwards carry on business as chemists and druggists, the Act plainly, I think, shows that they must undergo certain examinations which are wholly inapplic¬ able to any corporation. The conclusion, therefore, which I come to is that these words, “ unless ” and so on, are in¬ applicable to any corporations; that there being not a general prohibition of the trade or business, but merely a declaration that it shall be unlawful foa* a person, unless he complies with certain conditions, to carry on these otherwise lawful trades or businesses, not only keeping a shop for retailing poisons or selling poisons, but also to assume the title of chemist and druggist, or chemist or druggist, I cannot, my lords, but think that it is a sounder construction of the word “ person ” to hold that only such persons are contemplated as might, by taking proper means, comply with the condition and so enable them to carry on the trade. Exactly the same observa¬ tions occur, my lords, upon the 15th section. There, July 31, 18S0.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 105 again, transposing only the •words which occur in it, we find — and this is the section which imposes the penalties in question-. — the enactment is this : “ From and after the 31st day of December, 1868, any person not being a duly registered pharmaceutical chemist or chemist and druggist, who shall sell,” eta, and again, or who not being a phar¬ maceutical chemist, “shall take, use or exhibit the name or title of pharmaceutical chemist” shall be subject to certain penalties. The words follow also, “ or who shall compound. ’ ’ I think, haring reference to the particular act of compound¬ ing mentioned on each occasion, it rather fortifies than otherwise what I may describe as the individual— I was going to say personal — construction, but the very use of that word exemplifies the difficulty of applying the word "person” in the popular sense otherwise than t© indi¬ viduals. Well, my lords, if you look through the Act it will be found that there is only one place in the Act where it is necessary to put. upon the word “person” the larger sense, and that is in a clause which is in several respects remarkably contrasted with the rest of the provisions of the Act, I mean the 17 th sec¬ tion. It begins with a general prohibition in un¬ equivocal terms. Not it shall be unlawful for any person not coming under a certain definition to sell, but it shall be unlawful to sell at all, absolutely, unconditionally, to sell any poison as to which certain precautions are not observed. And that is repeated. It shall be unlawful to sell, it says at the beginning ; and four lines afterwards, it shall be unlawful to sell, again ; and, as I say, that is a universal prohibition not qualified by any exception as to the person, though no doubt the thing which is made unlawful is a thing done in a certain manner, or without the observance of certain conditions. In addition to that, the penalty there is not like the penalty under the 15th section, a civil debt to be recovered by a civil form of proceeding, or action, notwithstanding that it is for what is called an offence ; but it is a penalty to be recovered | upon summary conviction before two Justices. And then these words are added : “ And for the purposes of this section the person on whose behalf any sale is made by any apprentice or servant shall be deemed to be the seller,” which, the thing being made universally unlawful, I •think must include a corporation, if the sale was made by any apprentice or servant on behalf of the corporation. My lords, it appears to me that the difference in the •phraseology of that section from the rest is such as not to justify any other construction of the word “ person ” in ; the other sections, than that which it ought to have received if the 17th section had not been in the Act. And with regard to the main argument of the appellants, which would be a very important argument indeed if it were sustained, that the object of the Act would be de¬ feated unless a corporation as well as an individual were j included, it seems to me, my lords, that that argument cannot be successfully maintained. The act of selling, the act of compounding, and every other act mentioned in these two sections, by which penalties are imposed, and also in the 1st, is struck at, whether done by the principal to whom the business belongs or done by the person whom he employs to carry on the business. The words “ keeping open shop.” may not perhaps be so, and upon those I will make an observation presently; but that the word “sell” is, and that the word “compound” probably is, I think is clear from that very clause I just now read in the 17th section, that for the purpose of that section the person on whose behalf any sale is made by any apprentice or servant shall be 'deemed to be the seller. My lords, that indicates— I will not say necessarily — but naturally implies that that is a special construction for the purpose of the particular section, and is not to be extended to sale where mentioned in other sections ; and, my lords, I will add that regard to the mischief which, beyond all controversy, the Act was intended to prevent, leads necessarily to the same conclu¬ sion ; that he who sells, whether he be master or servant, whether he be the principal or the person delegated to conduct and manage the sales, is struck at by the 15th section, because otherwise you get this, that a very wide door would be open to all the things which the Act is intended to prohibit. Nothing mere would be necessary according to the appellants’ argument, if it were other¬ wise, than that the business should belong to a person who does not himself carry it on, but who is qualified under the Act ; and he might be at liberty to employ in the management of his business persons not qualified. By them the actual sales would be conducted, and the public would suffer those very evils which the Act was intended to prevent. The Act therefore, to be effectual, must strike at the particular acts of those who actually con¬ duct the sales — who actually compound the medicines. And if it does strike at those acts, no doubt that the words, “ keeping open shop” extend to something more and will comprehend a person who keeps an open shop, although he may not with his own hands do all the business of the selling or compounding medicines, and who is the master or proprietor of the premises, if he be a “ person ” within the proper construction ; but to say that you must in order to include a corporation, which may keep an open shop, necessarily extend the con¬ struction of the context, because if you do not there may be a shop kept by a person who will do nothing and who is not qualified — to say that is necessary for the objects of the Act appears to me to be really begging the question, because on that hypothesis, the corporation does nothing. It does not itself conduct the business, and the particular mischief which the public would suffer, from the sale of things which ought not to be sold, is sufficiently guarded against by prohibition of such sales, and the conditions to which they are made subject. Well, my lords, I said, to begin with, that I did not regard the matter as free from difficulty, but in a difficulty, if there be one, it does seem to me to be best to remember the principle that the liberty of the subject is not by unnecessary construction to be held to be abridged any further than the words require, and inasmuch as it was open to Her Majesty’s subjects before this Act passed to carry on the business of chemists and druggists, using the title of chemist and druggist, and, for the pur¬ pose of that business, keeping open shop for the sale, amongst other articles, of poisonous drugs, as it was per¬ fectly lawful to do that by means of a company incorpo¬ rated under the Companies Act, and as there is nothing whatever to show that the Legislature had grounds for assuming that there could be no such companies, and moreover, as there was a very great and leading company incorporated as a company of sellers of drugs and pharma- copists as long ago as the reign of James I., in whose name it is admitted the business of selling drugs has been carried on by their authority down to the present time, as that was the state of the law, I do think that it would be wrong for your lordships to impose upon the word “person,” used in such a context as that in which you find it used here, a construction which would at once render illegal that mode of carrying on the business of chemists and drug¬ gists by such corporations, without any reference from the beginning of the Act to the end to that class of per¬ sons, or to that kin l of case, more especially when you do find in the Act, in the 16th section, a special provision for the case of individuals carrying on that kind of business-, who may die, whose executors or trustees may carry it on after their deaths. It is true that the Legis¬ lature there requires for the safety of the public this safe¬ guard, that there shall be an assistant duly qualified, but the Legislature shows that having that case in view it was not thought that the object or policy of the Act required that such a business should be prohibited. It was not thought necessarily inconsistent with the object and the policy of the Act that the principals, the proprietors of the busi¬ ness, the persons to whom those actually selling the drugs would be responsible, should be unqualified, provided that there was in the business a duly qualified assistant. It by no means follows that all the drags would be sold 106 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [July 31, 1880. by that duly qualified assistant or that he might not be, as in this case, under the general superintendence of a manager not himself duly qualified. All that is left open, but it is thought not indispensable that the persons carry¬ ing on such businesses should be themselves duly qualified. My lords, if there were not safeguards against the sale of poisonous drugs in a manner contrary to the provisions of the Act by the persons actually conducting the business for the corporation, then, I think, the argument would have been extremely strong against a corporation being permitted to carry on the business, but where you find that there are such safeguards and that the keeping open shop in the case of executors is permitted although they be not qualified, I think it is impossible to infer that the object of the Act did require a larger construc¬ tion to be put on the word “person,” which the context appears to me upon a fair construction to exclude. I shall therefore advise your lordships that this appeal should be dismissed with costs. Lord Blackburn : I am of the same opinion. The question really, when it is cleared of all superfluity, is re¬ duced to a very short point, but, I agree that it is one not free from difficulty. The difficulty which I feel about the case is not generally upon those things which seem to have troubled most of the members of the Court below. I own I have no great doubt myself, for instance, that the word “ person ” may very well include both a natural person, a human being, and an artificial person, a corpora¬ tion. I think that in an Act of Parliament, unless there be something to the contrary, probably (I would not like to pledge myself to that) it ought to be held to in¬ clude both. I have equally no doubt that in common talk in the language of men, not speaking technically, a “person” does not include an artificial person, that is to say, a corporation. Nobody in common talk, if he were asked who was the richest person in London, would answer, the London and North Western Railway Com¬ pany. It is plain that in common speech “ person ” would mean a natural person. In technical language it may mean the other, but which meaning it has in any particular Act must depend on the context and the subject matter. I do not think that the presumption that it includes an artificial person, a corporation, if the presumption does arise there, is at all strong. Circumstances, and indeed very slight circumstances, in the context might show which way the word is to be construed in an Act of Parliament ; whether it is to have one or the other meaning. And I am quite clear about this, that whenever you can see the object of the Act requires that “ person ” shall have the more extended sense or the less extended sense, whichever of those the object of the Act shows that it requires, then you should apply the word in that sense and construe the Act accordingly. My view of the matter is that the question of what “ person ” means in this particular Act gives rise to the whole difficulty, but I may further say now, in order to avoid coming back to it, that I do not feel the least difficulty arising from what seems to have troubled some of the judges below in this case. If this means a corporation, I quite agree that a corporation cannot commit crime in one sense, a corporation cannot be imprisoned, if imprisonment be the sentence for the crime ; a corporation cannot be hanged and put to death, if that be the punishment for the crime. In all those senses a corporation cannot commit a crime, but a corporation may be fined or may pay damages, and I must totally dissent, notwithstanding what Lord Justice Bramwell said, or is reported to have said, from the supposition that a corporation that incor¬ porated itself for publishing a newspaper could not be fined, or an action for damages brought against it for libel, or that a corporation that commits a nuisance could not be convicted of the nuisance, or the like. I must really say I do not feel the slightest doubt about that part of the case, and I think if we could get over the first difficulty of saying that the “person” here may be construed to include an artificial person, a corpora¬ tion, I should not have the least difficulty upon the other grounds that have been suggested. But then, my lords, my conclusion, looking at this Act, is that it is clear to my mind that the word “person” here is so used as to show that it does not include a corporation, and that there is no object or intention of the statute which shows that we should require to extend the word to a sense which probably those who used it, the Legislature, did not think of and were not thinking of at all. I do not think the Legislature were thinking of bodies corporate at all. They begin with a preamble. “ Whereas it is expedient for the safety of the public that persons keeping open shop for the retailing, dispensing or com¬ pounding of poisons, and persons known as chemists and druggists, should possess a competent practical know¬ ledge of their business.” Stopping there, it is quite plain to my mind that those who used that language were not thinking of corporations. A corporation may, in one sense, possess a competent knowledge of its business, if it employs competent directors, and so forth, but it cannot possibly have, for all substantial purposes of the public protection, a competent knowledge of itself. The metaphysical entity, the legal person, cannot possibly have a competent knowledge, nor can, I think, a corpora¬ tion be supposed to be a person known as a chemist and druggist. They were not thinking of a corporation; they said that henceforth it was desirable that those who carried on this business should have a competent know¬ ledge. It afterwards appears that the Legislature were persuaded by the Pharmaceutical Society (I dare say very rightly) to think that the best test of competency was that they should be a member of this Society. It then goes on to the enacting part, and the 1st section is the most material, that “ it shall be unlawful for any person to sell or keep open shop for retailing, dispensing or compounding poisons, or to assume or use the title of chemist and druggist, or chemist or druggist.” Now, stopping there, it does seem to me that, without laying down any technical rule, the plain meaning of the words, and the words are used in that sense, is such a person as could become a pharmaceutical chemist. A corporation cannot, a individual can. It seems to me, therefore, it plainly says in section 1 “ that it shall be unlawful to sell or keep open shop, or assume the name of chemist or druggist for any person, that is to say any natural person, unless he becomes a pharmaceutical chemist. The 15th section imposes a penalty, and in imposing the penalty repeats the words which made the thing unlawful. I think those two sections must be construed together. Now, is there anything here in the context or in the object to show that we should take that word “ person,” which I think must have been used by those who framed the Act, and understood by the Legislature as meaning a natural person and extend it, and say that it applies to a cor¬ poration? I cannot see anything. If there had been any¬ thing in the Act or anything in the nature of things which made it reasonable that it should be provided that all the profits to be derived from vending poisons or poisonous drugs should be shared amongst those who are pharma¬ ceutical chemists and that nobody else should intermeddle with that trade ; if there was anything of that sort, in order to carry out that object it would be necessary to say that “ person ” includes corporation, and not a natural person only. But that object is certainly not avowed on the face of the Act. Whether any of those who promoted the Act had any such idea in their minds or not I cannot tell ; but they have not brought it forward or put it in such words as would at all lead the Legislature to think of it. and it is exceedingly improbable that if they had boldly said “ and bodies corporate and joint stock companies shall not deal in drugs,” or, if you like, in poisonous drugs, “ unless they pay black mail to us,” I think the Legislature would hardly have done it. They have not done that in distinct terms. Now is there anything in the object of the Act which requires such an interpretation ? I quite agree that a body corporate may July 31, 1880.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 107 keep an open shop, and no mischief is done there, if they employ for the purpose of conducting the sale qualified assistants and people who may manage the sale ; if those qualified persons do superintend the sale there, I see no harm that can arise. But no doubt the Legislature have, for what reason it is for those who passed the Act to say, thought it best to say that a person — whom I take to be a natural person — shall not only not sell, but shall not keep an open shop for the sale. I think myself that probably one reason for that was to facilitate convictions; and another reason may have been that it was thought if there may be a person who keeps a shop, who is unqualified, and he may have a qualified as¬ sistant, he may overrule the qualified assistant, at any moment he pleases and there may be danger in that. Those are intelligible motives ; but neither of those motives applies where it is a case of a corporation ; for the body corporate itself could not interfere and however much the body corporate may have been unqualified, their being so would not affect the matter. Then comes another objection. It is said, if you put that construction you defeat the Act altogether. That I cannot admit. I hold distinctly that there can be no sale, whether a corpo¬ ration be the ultimate vendor or not, unless a person, a natural person, manages the sale, and that natural per¬ son, if unqualified, would in my mind clearly become liable to the penalty under the Act. And though I am not so elear on thi-q I feel strongly inclined to think that , if a corporation or anybody else caused an unqualified person to conduct sales, and it could be brought home to them and shown that they deliberately did cause the person to infringe the Act, I am by no means clear that they would not be, under section 15, liable to penalties themselves. Qui facit per alium facit per se. I do not, however, say that I am quite certain of that ; but I think it necessary to say that because so repeatedly in the argument it was assumed that a corporation was entirely out of this Act altogether, which is not at all my view of it. . I say that a corporation is out of that clause which prohibits persons from keeping open shop. I do not go further than that, and say anything more. Now, as to the rest, I really do not think that there are any sections of the Act, or any of the cases cited, or any general legal principle, which requires to be noticed. It does seem to me that the case will come after all to this : Does “ person,’ which may include a corporation, include it here ? For the reasons I have given, I think it does not. Is there anything in the context or anything in the object of the Legislature which requires that, although the word “person” would not properly include a corporation, yet in this particular case we should extend it and make it include a corporation, I think there is not in this section. In section 17 there is quite sufficient reason for doing so; but in sections 1 and 15 1 think there is not. Lord Watson : My lords, it is impossible to disguise the fact that this statute is characterized by great am¬ biguity, I would almost go the length of saying confusion, of language. That probably arises from the circumstance that the framers of this Act were dealing with two separate matters : the one, improvement of a society called the Pharmaceutical Society ; the other the regulation of the sale of poisons generally throughout Great Britain. That Society had existed from 1843, when it was incorporated by Royal Charter for the avowed purpose “of advancing chemistry and pharmacy, and promoting an uniform system of education of those who should practise the same ; and also for the protection of those who carry on the business of chemists and druggists.” In 1852 the Legislature, by the statute (chapter 56 of the 15th and 16th of the Queen), made various improvements in the constitution of the body upon the recital that it was “expedient to prevent ignorant and incompetent persons from assuming the title of or pre¬ tending to be pharmaceutical chemists or pharmaceutists in Great Britain.” When you come to the Act of 1868, the Act which we are dealing with, you not only have further improvements made in the character of the body and its constitution but you have very important changes made, and a position and privilege accorded them by statute. Down to 1852, and subsequently to 1852, they had no special privilege; nothing in the nature of monopoly or exclusive privilege, and the Act of that year was simply intended, not to prevent other persons from dealing in drugs of any description, but to prevent those persons when dealing in drugs from assuming a title which the members of the Society were alone entitled to. But when you come to the Act of 1868, the provisions of the statute undoubtedly give to them the sole right to sell drugs as individuals, or to keep open shops for the sale of poisonous drugs as individuals, because all individuals who are not possessed of the qualification of membership of the Society, or who have not passed the requisite examination and had their names on the register, are prohibited under penalties from dealing by retail in these articles. Now, my lords, I must say that when I come to deal with what is called — I say it with respect — the intention of the Legislature, I find the greatest possible difficulty in making up my mind as . to what it should be. I think the considerations of policy on either side are pretty evenly balanced, in fact I have almost been inclined to hold that considerations of policy rather preponderate in favour of the appellants’ argument ; but that is not enough ; it is not enough for me to speculate as to what was in the mind of the framer of this statute ; whether he had forgotten the fact that there were corporations which either were dealing or might deal in poisonous drugs ; or whether, having this in view, he framed this Act for the purpose of subjecting them to certain disabilities. I can only look, my lords, at the language the Legislature had employed in the enacting clauses, sections 1 and 15, and I can only say this, that even if I were satisfied that it had been the intention of the framer of these two sections to give, to individuals registered under the Act the exclusive, privi¬ lege of selling poisonous drugs by retail, and so impose penalties upon a corporation keeping open shop for that purpose, I must say I come to this conclusion, that it would have been very simple for the Legislature to have said so in express terms. And I, for my own part, am quite satisfied, even apart from those considerations.which have led your lordships to put another construction on the terms of the statute, that the framer, if that was his intention, has entirely failed to use language adequate for the purpose which he intended. The Lord Chancellor then formally put the question that the appeal be dismissed with costs, and declared it to be carried. ©Wtitarg. JAMES FOULIS PLOMLEY. It is with regret that we announce the death of another of the founders of the Pharmaceutical Society, Mr. J ames Foulis Plomley, at his residence, Fairfield, near Rye. Plomley, in 1836, acquired the old established busi¬ ness in High Street, which he continued to conduct until 1857, when he took into partnership Mr. W. A. Waters, and in the following year retired from the active duties of the business. In all affairs connected with the town of Rye, Mr. Plomley took an intense interest, he having, been a member of the Corporation for several years, and in 1852 he was elected Mayor ; in virtue of that office he attended the Duke of Wellington’s Funeral as one of the Barons of the Cinque Ports. A few years later he was made a magistrate for the borough ; but having had a stroke, of paralysis a few years ago, he was compelled to relinquish all active duties, and he gradually grew weaker and more feeble till his death, on July 14, at the age of 71 years. 108 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [July 31, 1880. CoiTesponbmrc* *,* Nj notice can be taken of anonymous communica tions. Whatever is intended for insertion must be authenti¬ cated by the name and address of the writer; not necessarily for publication , but as a guarantee of good faith. The Society’s Case in the House of Lords. Sir, — On reading your remarks on this case at page 61 of this week’s J ournal, as regards individual traders, I cannot shut my eyes to the fact that many of our members conduct business on the same principle as the stores, inasmuch as some members open branch establishments at a distance from their own, and place an assistant to manage such branch. I could give many instances ; there is one in a village not far fiom where I live, and the proprietor has an establish¬ ment twelve miles distant, and visits his branch, sometimes once a month or fortnight for a few hours. Now, our member may perhaps understand his business better than the proprietors of the stores generally do, but as he is absent on other duties, and, as the stores place a competent dispensing gentleman in their establishment, where is the difference ? Is it not tu quoque ? Doimside Villa, Chilcompton, Bath. Joseph Leay. The Pharmaceutical Society v The London and Provincial Supply Association. Sir, — It is pitiful to observe upon what technical grounds the decision in this case rests. It really turned upon this point — “persons” must not be interpreted to include “corporations ” in the prohibitory sections of the Pharmacy Act, because the qualifying sections demand from “ persons ” that which “corporations ” cannot possibly fulfil. In other words, because a “corporation” cannot qualify, it cannot be disqualified. In effect it reduces qualification to a negative state, and might, with as much reason assume everybody to be qualified who has not presented himself and been pronounced disqualified by the examiners. The statute requires a qualified master ; it does not require a qualified servant. The judgment dispenses with a qualified master, and sanctions a qualified servant. This may be an improvement on the statute, but it is not the meaning of the statute ; but perhaps I am No Judge. Sir, — The recent decision of the House of Lords in the case of the Pharmaceutical Society v. the London and Provincial Supply Association cannot be said to come as a surprise to the trade. Though not unanticipated, it will still be a bitter pill to many. Those who so eagerly advocated interference with the operations of co-operative stores will now perhaps see with regret that the only results attained are a loss of prestige on the part of the Society as a body established for and acting in the public interest, an advertisement of the stores, and to give to what have hitherto been unauthorized traders a definite legal position. Henceforth it will be perfectly easy for a grocer to convert himself into a limited company, with a qualified chemist holding one Bhare, and by whom a regular drug business may be carried on. Grocers will for the future feel quite secure against legal action in the knowledge of the defeat of the Society, and we must expect that they will act on that knowledge. Drugs offer a wide and profitable field as an opening to a grocer, who can afford to retail them at prices which to a chemist would be totally unremunerative. No doubt a loud outcry will be raised at the dismissal of the appeal to the House of Lords, and demands made for an alteration of the law. It will be as well to recognize at once the fact that no alteration of the law in a sense adverse to the Lord Chancellor’s judgment is possible, and for this reason : in the case just concluded, though the Society may or may not have had law on its side, it was fighting an adversary who in the long run always wins, viz. common sense. Any appeal to Parliament would have to be based on common sense and the public welfare. How then would it be possible to go before the Legislature with a proposal to restrict companies in the sale of drugs — acknowledging, as it would be necessary to do, that none but qualified men were so employed — when it is perfectly competent for a chemist to keep open half a dozen shops without a qualified assistant in any one of them ? So obvious is the retort, and so certain in my view is it to be the position taken up by Parliament, that even had the Pharmaceutical Society won a victory in the recent contest, it would have been an inglorious one, resulting in the introduction to the House of Commons, next session, of a measure legalizing the carrying on of drug businesses by companies, a measure which having common sense on its side, would undoubtedly have been carried. Nothing it appears to me can be done. The House of Commons will not prevent co-operative societies carrying on the trade of chemist and druggist, unless it can be proved that in so doing they are acting in a manner injurious to the public welfare. This, under the circum¬ stances, cannot be done, and it would therefore be fatuous to approach Parliament with proposals for a monopoly, based on interests so manifestly private. Major, Sir, — Now that the lawyers have sifted the question of liability of co-operative stores, in the matter of qualification for dispensing prescriptions, etc., and the House of Lords has finally settled the object, may we not, as sadder, but wiser men gain some small advantage as well as disappoint¬ ment at our defeat ? It is evident that the point of view from which their lord- ships decided the question was one which many in our pro¬ fession had in a measure lost sight of, viz., that the Act of 1868 was not so much to benefit those whose names were placed on the register as to protect the public from a class of compounders of medicine wholly incapacitated for their calling ; and so long as the preparation of prescriptions, etc. is confined to the hands of those whose education qualifies them for their duties and are responsible for their own acts it was with their lordships only a secondary consideration whether they were in the service of co-operative stores, or in the position of assistants, or in business on their own account. It is difficult to us, as parties concerned, correctly to view a question in which our own interests are so much at stake, but apart from that the decision appears very much in ac¬ cordance with what the public have a right to expect from the authors of the Act, and it would be well for those who are looking for benefit derived from having their names on the register, or to the decision of legal tribunals in their favour, to fight the* battle of competition with their own hands, and instead of allowing a mere professional education to give a distaste for the tradesman-like work at the counter, remember that acuteness in conducting business in kindred trades has increased greatly in the competing times in which we live, and not only must the stores, but oilmen and grocers be met in their own way of conducting business, but in a manner perhaps never contemplated by our predecessors in business thirty years ago. Wandsworth. G. N. “ Lavandula .” — Your problem is one that might be solved by experiment. Possibly your object would be at¬ tained by slightly varying the relative proportions of the ingredients. T. H. Potuell is thanked for his communication. W. U. C. — You are recommended to submit the question to a solicitor. “ Beta.” — A recipe for “ bay rum ” will be found in vol. viii. of the present series of this Journal, p. 679. “ Bay Leaf ” will find recipes for effervescing saline pre¬ parations in the Journal for March 29, 1879, p. 807. B. E. Williams. — (1) The table, etc., was published in vol. vii., p. 989. (2 and 3) We can give you no information on these points beyond what is contained in the Regulations of the Board of Examiners. (4) We believe not. J. Y. H. — The examiners are not limited to any particular work, in making the selections. Communications, Letters, etc., have been received from Messrs. Waters, MacCormac, Crocker, Williams, Postans, Wright, Stewart, Landerer, Powell, Edward, Yalkenburg, Bouttell, Haydon, Grant, J. G. H., J. J., P. T. W., 374, J. G. S., L., T. P. J., R. L. G., J. N., C. T. W., J. F., A. B. C., Tyro, Ivor, Associate, Beta, Assistant, Nemo, Student. August 7, 18S0.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 109 “THE MONTH.” Although like the witches in 1 Macbeth. ’ w e have been “iri lightning, thunder and in rain” during the past month, very little damage appears to have been done as yet to the vegetable kingdom. < Of all the months in the year July is perhaps the most prolific in flowers, and the laboratory of nature is in this month most abundantly furnished with material upon which the student, fresh from his three months’ course of lectures, can experiment, and can thus practically acquaint himself with the truths already learnt theoretically from books. Amonc the medicinal plants in blossom in botani¬ cal gardens this month may be mentioned Atropa, Belladonna , Datura Stramonium and D. Tatula, camomile, lavender, foxglove, hemlock, dulcamara, elecampane, rue, hyssop, borage, alkanet and vale¬ rian. The last mentioned is now unrolling the pappus from the rim-like limb surmounting the calyx tube and thus shows how nearly allied the family is to the Composite, which it also approaches m the character of the ovary, of which one or two cells frequently become abortive in some species. . At Kew Gardens the white horehound (if it be correctly labelled) seems to have taken on a peculiar character, the flowers having a decided pale purple tint like that of the blossoms of Stachys germamca or Galamintha Glinopodium , as if the insects visiting the horehound had gone to it from some other hoary leaved plant, such as those above named, with purplish flowers, misled by the general re¬ semblance of their leaves, and so cross-fertilized it and caused a variation in colour. At all events the plant has appeared year after year with blossoms of the same hue. . Another plant, belonging to the same natural order, viz. Salvia Sclarea , now forms a beautiful object in the Herbaceous Ground at Kew. The white flowers, and the large white bracts, faintly tipped purple, are almost indistinguishable from each other at a distance and the handsome groups of white spike-like inflo¬ rescences are thrown into strong relief by the back¬ ground of green foliage close by. The seeds of the com¬ mon wild species, Salvia verbenaca, as well as several others, develop a quantity of mucilage when placed in water, and have been used in Cheshire and other parts of England to clear the eyesight ; hence the com¬ mon name of clary or clear eye. For this purpose a single seed is placed in the eye, and any irritating particle soon becomes enveloped in the mucilage and is thus easily removed. The pretty meadow sage, Salvia pratensis, found only in two or three localities in this country, seems on the other side of the chan¬ nel, in the neighbourhood of Paris, to be one of the commonest species. It is to this plant, under the o name of Salvia hcematodes, that red behen root is as¬ cribed in India. Another species, Salvia lyrata, a native of Canada, has a reputation for the cuie of cancer, and has thus acquired the name of cancer 'weed. An interesting account, by Professor Rothrock, is given in the Gardener’s Chronicle , J une 26, p. 808, of the seed of a species of Salvia ( S . columbaria, Benth.), possessing mucilaginous properties. These seeds, which are roasted and ground, when mixed with water into a sort of porridge, are eaten as food. A small portion mixed with a quantity of water is used to assuage thirst, and enables those who drink it to lessen the large amount of liquid which otherwise is often taken in hot countries to Third Series* No. 528. the detriment of health. In gastro -intestinal disorders it forms a valuable remedy, on account of its demulcent and at the same time exceedingly nutritive properties. It is also used to remove foreign bodies from the eye by means of the mucilage it develops. The popular name for this seed is “ chia.” The student should not neglect to observe the distractile anthers in the genus Salvia, and that two of the stamens are not developed. The curious effect of the arrangement of the sta¬ mens, by which the insertion of the proboscis of a bee causes the pollen to be deposited on the back of the insect, may be readily imitated by pushing a stalk of grass or a pin’s head down the tube of the corolla. Professor Rothrock states also that he believes that the early natives of California smoked the leaves of Nicotiana Clevelandii, A. Gray, a species which has only lately become known to botanists. It is a small plant with small flowers, and the tobacco made from it is said to be exceedingly strong. Among the rarer British plants which may now be seen in flower at Kew may be mentioned TJrtica pihdifera and its two varieties, Herniaria glabra, Leonurus Cardiaca , Ajuga Chamoepitys, Melittis Melissophyllum , Phyteuma orbiculare, and the blue pimpernel. Several of the natural orders with in¬ conspicuous flowers are now in good condition for examination, such as Chenopodiacese, Paronycliiaceoe and Polygon acese. The singular calyptrate calyx of Eschscholtzia, the clavate filaments of the meadow rue, the flowers of the mullein, Nigella sativa , and the curious inflorescence of Eryngium and Astrantia, are now in good condition lor observation. The coriander is also in full blossom, and anyone who chooses to rub a leaf between the fingers will ob¬ serve what a remarkable difference there is between the fetid odour of the fresh plant, which will doubt¬ less be familiar to most Londoners, and the fragrant perfume of the ripe fruits. In the Economic House at Kew the Adenanthera pavonina is now in blossom. The flowers are small and yellowish and arranged in a raceme, and, from being regular, would hardly be recognized as belonging to the Leguminosce. The anthers are tipped with a stalked gland, whence the name Adenanthera. It is rather singular that the flower should be so inconspicuous, and that the beauty which seems the natural right of ffowers should be lavished on the seeds, which are brilliantly polished and of the most splendid scarlet colour. Indeed, the object of the brilliant hue of seeds is one that would probably repay investigation. These seeds weigh almost uniformly 4 grains, and are used as weights by jewellers in the east, and aie sometimes pounded and mixed with borax to form a cement. Buttercups and daisies are almost regarded in the light of children’s playthings, but, like other toys, are occasionally found to injure the little ones. In the Times fox July 12 it is stated that a child died from the effects of eating some buttercups m New- sham Park, Liverpool. The acrid principle is evidently of a volatile nature, since the buttercups are not inj urious when made into hay . Although the juice is used in homoeopathic medicine, its chemical constitution does not appear to be well. known. In the Gardener’s Chronicle , July 3, p. 11, an interesting notice is given by Mr. W. B. Hemsley of the nectaries in the Marcgraviacea, winch is well worth reading by those who take an interest in the fertilization of plants by the external agency o 110 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [August 7, 1S80. insects and birds. The members of this exotic family have usually an inflorescence, which either forms a long raceme, as in Norantea , or, as in some species of Marcgravia, is condensed into an umbel¬ late form. In several of the species with a racemose inflorescence the flowers are erect, and the nectaries, at first erect, become pendulous. In these cases, as in Norantea Paraensis, the nectaries which are tubular, flask or helmet-shaped are formed of the bracts, and the humming birds which visit them for the nectar, brush otf the pollen from the flowers with their breasts. In Marcgravia , in which the inflo¬ rescence is generally a raceme condensed into an umbel, four or five of the terminal or central flowers of the umbel are not developed as blossoms, but remain in a rudimentary state, while the united pedicels and bracts form nectaries. As the umbel is pendulous and the nectaries hang down in the centre and are usually brilliantly coloured, while the flowers are small and inconspicuous, the humming birds which visit the plants brush off the pollen with their wings and backs while dipping their beaks into the nectaries. The inner surface of the nectary cup corresponds with the under surface of the bract. Those readers who follow bryology as a hobby, will be glad to learn that Dr. R. Braith waite has commenced his monographs of the families of the British mosses. The first number contains the An- dreseaceoe and the second one the Buxbaumiacese and Tetraphidacese, and from the character of the illustrations, which are excellent, and of the botanical details, which are most complete, it is evident that the work will be a standard one for British bryologists. The Journal of the Royal Microscopical Society , which is now issued bi-monthly, has become a most valuable publication, which is due in great measure to the energy of Mr. F. Crisp. The journal gives the most complete record published in this country of current researches relating to microscopic subjects, conveniently arranged under their various headings of botany, zoology, etc. The peculiar glaucous appearance of eucalyptus leaves has been found by Dr. Schunck {Chemic d News, July 16) to be due, not to a special condi¬ tion of the chlorophyll, but to an extremely thin film of fatty matter, upon the removal of which by ether the leaves assume the ordinary green colour of other leaves. But there does exist a peculiarity in the chlorophyll of eucalyptus leaves in that al¬ though the green solution obtained by extracting the leaves from the tips of the branches with ether or alcohol shows at first the usual absorption bands of ordinary unchanged chlorophyll, yet after being kept a few days in the dark it acquires a yellowish colour and then shows absorption bands coinciding with those of “acid chlorophyll,” being that modification produced at once by adding a few drops of acid to an ordinary solution of chlorophyll. Dr. Schunck ap¬ pears inclined to attribute this peculiarity to the ozonizing effects of the essential oil present in the leaves, but this hypothesis is not supported by the result of some experiments made with leaves from the orange tree. Thundery weather generally brings mildew and blight with it, but this year there is comparatively little to be seen as yet. As the use of the micro¬ scope becomes more common and the study of these minute organisms better known, it seems probable that sanitary as well as botanical science will make rapid strides, while various arts will be no less indebted to what at first are liable to be regarded as dry scientific facts. Thus the discovery that a minute fungus, Mucor circinelloides, common on liorse-dung, has the power to cause fermentation in glucose, while it does not alter cane sugar, has been utilized to separate cane sugar from molasses by fermenting the glucose and so allowing the cane sugar to crystallize out ( Journ . de Pharmacie, June, p. 542). Another instance of a rule of thumb practice proving to have a sound basis is found in the custom that has long been almost universally followed of allowing the plucked olives to stand in heaps until fermentation takes place before pressing them, under the belief that the yield of oil is then greater. M. Planchud {Journ. Pharm. et de Chim., July) has made some experiments that have led him to the conclu¬ sion that this belief is founded on fact, and that during the fermentation, which is due to a my coderm belonging to the genus Penicillium that is developed on the surface of the olive, there is a transformation of a portion of the pericarp into oil. If, however, the fermentation be allowed to go on too long, the odour becomes disagreeable, the colour of the fungoid gro wth changes, and a portion of the original oil dis¬ appears. When the development of fungus was prevented by dusting the olives with powdered borax no variation in the yield of oil took place. At the meeting of the Royal Society on June 10, Dr. Hind read a paper on Bacterium fcetidum, an organism to which the fetid odour of profusely per¬ spiring feet appears to be due. It was obtained for purposes of experiment, by teasing out a small por¬ tion of the sole of a wet stocking in water and culti¬ vating the micrococci in pure vitreous humour. The fetid odour of the stocking was reproduced in the liquid used for cultivating the bacteria. Although the strength of the odour diminished in successive generations, Dr. Hind stated at the meeting that an antiseptic treatment, by which the bacteria were killed in the stocking and inner surface of the soles of the boots, completely destroyed the fcetor.* Reports from Nicolaieff and Taganrog speak of the enormous damage done to the cereal crops in South Russia by a species of May beetle, the Anisoplia Austriaca. The insect first appeared in the country in 1865, and some idea of the increase of the plague may be gathered from the statement that ten bushels of beetles have been collected from a single acre of wheat. The insect takes about twenty-two months to develop from a lava to a full grown beetle, so that the greatest damage has hitherto been done in alternate years ; but there are signs in some districts that the destruction will henceforth be annual. The beetle attacks the half ripe ears of wheat, but oats and barley escape. Very little appears to be done effectively to limit the ravages of these destructive insects, for when they are observed blackening the ears of corn by their countless numbers, all that is usually done is to stretch a rope across the field and drag it over the corn. The insects are thus shaken off, but with them a great number of wheat ears, while it is only a matter of time for the insects to regain their places. The cultivation of the red cinchona in Jamaica is, according to the Gardener’s Chronicle, June 26, p. 806, in a most satisfactory and encouraging state. Ten thousand pounds weight of bark has been ob¬ tained from 2490 trees, giving an average of a little over 4 lb. of dry bark per tree. * Nature, July 1, 1880. August 7, 18*0.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. Ill It is now four years since Dr. Lauder Brunton published his experiments4 on the action of mancona, sassy or casca bark, as it has been severally called, and but little use appears to have been hitherto made of the properties of this powerful drug. MM. See and Bochefontaine have, however, recently been using it in the treatment of certain cardiac and respiratory affections. They find that the active principle erythrophloein increases the vascular ten¬ sion and at first slows the pulse and respiration ; the respiratory movements are, however, afterwards quickened, and in fatal cases persist, even after the cessation of the action of the heart. f Drs. Tomlinson and Murphyi call attention to the value of hydroclilorate of apomorphia in the treat¬ ment of sunstroke. The drug administered as soon as possible in a dose of one-tenth of a grain, injected subcutaneously, produced emesis in less than ten minutes. In no case was there distressing nausea, but apparently an almost instantaneous evacuation of the contents of the stomach. The temperature was reduced, the pupils became widely dilated, and sensation and movements returned in half an hour. One of those curious cases in which the medical profession is indebted to those outside of it for sug¬ gestions or remedies, is recounted in an amusing manner in a recent number of the Lancet (July 3, p. 6), by Drs. Ringer and Murrell. An old gentle¬ man, who for many years suffered from distressing acidity, read in a daily paper that glycerine added to milk prevents its turning sour, and he reasoned thus: — “If glycerine prevents milk turning sour, why should it not prevent me turning sour ? ” and he resolved to try the efficacy of glycerine for his acidity. The success of his experiment was com¬ plete, and whenever tormented by his old malady he cures himself by a recourse to glycerine. Drs. Ringer and Murrell quote the statement of J. Mekulics§ that glycerine, although it destroys bac¬ teria and prevents the formation of septic poison,, dissolves and preserves the septic poison itself, and point out that glycerine does not hinder the diges¬ tive action of pepsine and hydrochloric acid, so that while it prevents the formation of wind and acidity, probably by checking fermentation, it in no way retards digestion. The use of 1 to 2 drachms of glycerine, either before, with or immediately after food is recommended, or it may replace sugar in tea and coffee. In some instances, a cure does not occur till the lapse of ten or sixteen days. Mekulics found that glycerine in the proportion of 2 per cent, prevented decomposition in nitrogenous fluids, such as diluted blood, for twenty-four hours, at ordinary temperatures, that 10 per cent, would prevent it fur five days, and that 20 per cent, prevented it alto¬ gether, even at a higher temperature. According to the Prog res Med., |j Dr. Fonssagrives, having ascertained that the addition of oil of anise effectually masks the taste of cod liver oil and iodo¬ form, employs this combination where it is necessary to give iodine, as that substance can be conveyed into the economy in larger proportion by means of iodo¬ form than in any other way. To 100 grams of cod liver oil ^ of a gram of iodoform and 10 drops of oil of anise are used. _ * Lancet, Dec. 2, 1876. + Lancet, June 26, 1880, p. 1011. J Practitioner, June, 1880, p. 453. From Ind. Med. Gaz., November 1, 1879. § Archivf. Min. Chir., Bd. xxii., Heft 2, 1878. || Med. Times and Gaz., p. 6. A ranunculaceous plant growing in a limited chalky district in the Lower Pyrenees, — the Thalic- trum m.acrocarpum , — having been observed to possess poisonous properties, has been examined by Messrs. Bochefontaine and Doassans, and the latter has suc¬ ceeded in isolating from it a colourless crystallizable principle, giving alkaloidal reactions, which he has named “thallictrine” and considers to be the toxic principle ( Comptes Bendus , xc., 1432). A non-nitro- genous crystalline colouring matter has also been separated in small clear yellow prisms, devoid of ap¬ parent physiological properties, and named “macro- carpine. ” Thallictrine crystallizes in slender needles grouped around a common centre; it is soluble in alcohol and nearly insoluble in water, but combines with, acids to form salts that are soluble in water. The physiological properties of thallictrine are com¬ pared to those of aconitine. The paralysis of the nervous system which it determines is however more marked than that caused by aconitine, whilst with aconitine the emesis and respiratory disturbances are greater. Aconitine is toxic in smaller doses than is thallictrine, and it is therefore suggested that thallic- trine, being hence more manageable, might be of service in therapeutics. Still further progress has been made by Herr Ladenburg in elucidation of the relation of the prin¬ cipal solanaceous alkaloids to each other. It will be remembered that he had arrived at the conclusion that hyoscy amine, daturine and duboisine are one and the same alkaloid, which although isomeric with nevertheless differs from atropine. He has now found (Per., xiii., 607) that even this difference is probably only a physical one, and that the decomposition pro¬ ducts yielded when these alkaloids are treated with baryta — namely, tropine and tropic acid from atropine, and liyoscine and hyoscinic acid from hyoscyamine, daturine and duboisine — are identical. This he has confirmed by preparing atropine artificially by treating with dilute hydrochloric acid compounds formed from (1) tropine from atropine and hyoscinic acid from daturine, (2) hyoscine from hyoscyamine and tropic acid from atropine, and (3) hyoscine and hyoscinic acid both from hyoscyamine. The result¬ ing alkaloidal products were converted into gold salt, which in each case agreed in every respect with the characteristic gold salt of atropine. In this way, therefore, it would appear that hyoscyamine may be converted into atropine, and Herr Ladenburg is still engaged on experiments as to the possibility of con¬ verting atropine into hyoscyamine. With respect to homatropine (see vol. x., pp. 755, 955) it is now an¬ nounced ( Ber ., xiii., 1340) that it has been obtained in the crystalline condition. When recrystallized from absolute ether it occurs in well-formed colour¬ less prisms, melting between 95‘5° and 98’5° C., and having a composition corresponding with the formula C16H21N03. Notwithstanding that the base is not readily soluble in water, the crystals are hy¬ groscopic and even deliquescent. One advantage that is claimed for homatropine in ophthalmic prac¬ tice is that it is not so powerful a poison as atropine. Professor Stoder, of Amsterdam, has been making some experiments in working up the press residues from the preparation of syrupus rhei for the chryso- phanic acid they contain. The dried residue reduced to a powder was treated in a displacement apparatus with benzol until the benzol passed through colour¬ less, when the greater part of it was distilled off. The concentrated liquid was decanted from separated 112 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [August 7, 1880. ernodin, and evaporated in a water-bath nearly to dryness, and the residue again carefully extracted with hot benzol. Upon evaporation and cooling of the liquid the chrysophanic acid crystallized out, and was purified by recrystallization from spirit. In this way it is stated that the press residues yielded as much as 09 per cent, of crystallized acid; but it is worthy of remark that this is a larger proportion of crysophanic acid than was found to exist ready- formed in good specimens of rhubarb by Dragendorff ( Pharrn . Journ ., [3], viii., 829) or H. Greenish (76., ix., 933). The subject is not a new one, as there is a specimen of chrysophanic acid in the Society’s Museum which was prepared from the residue of extract of rhubarb by Mr. T. F. Hanbury in 1872. It is now stated on the authority of the Farber Zeitung, No. 2, that Professor Baeyer has discovered a practicable method of preparing indigo artificially on the manufacturing scale, and that the patent has been assigned to the Baden Aniline Company. The indigo is said to be prepared from isatine chloride, which in its turn is produced from benzol. The nature of the corrosion which takes place in vessels in which caustic soda is constantly melted has been the subject of an investigation by Messrs. Brunck and Graebe (. Ber ., xiii.). The mud which is deposited in such a vessel was found to contain dark brownish- violet bronze coloured scales, with a high metallic lustre, having mainly the composition of the hy¬ drated ferric oxide, Fe204H2, but with a little ferric oxide replaced by manganese. Under the micro¬ scope the scales appeared transparent, and yellow or brownish-yellow, according to thickness ; they had a specific gravity of 2‘91 to 2 ‘92, being thus distin¬ guished from gothite, the native ferric hydrate, which has a specific gravity of 4‘0 to 4’4. Crystallized hy¬ drated ferric oxide thus produced is slightly magnetic. It dissolves very slowly in cold hydrochloric acid, and rapidly in hot. Dilute sulphuric acid and nitric acid dissolve the crystals slowly when heated, but have no other appreciable effect upon them. The water is only driven off gradually by heat, part being retained until after prolonged exposure to a tem¬ perature of 200° C. ; after ignition an almost black oxide of iron is left. Dr. Farrar, of Brooklyn, is responsible for the fol¬ lowing curious calculation in dentistry. He says that in the United States alone not less than half a ton of pure gold is annually packed into decayed teeth by dentists, and that if the consumption continues at this rate all the gold at present in circulation will be reburied in the earth in about three hundred years. It is estimated that the daily yield of petroleum by the Pennsylvania oil wells during the month of September last, amounted to 63,500 gallons, whilst the total yield for 1879 exceeded by several millions of barrels that of any previous year. The total quantity of refined petroleum exported from New York during 1879 was 254,701,316 gallons, of which 47,186,757 gallons came to England. The export of crude petroleum, naphtha, and residuum amounted to upwards of 50,000,000 gallons more. In continuance of some observations made in the last “ Month,” with regard to dispensing scales and their weights, in presence of the recent Weights and Measures Act, it may be observed that some difficulty will be experienced by the dispenser in keeping the several weights in such a condition that they may be found by the inspector, in his periodical visits, toler¬ ably constant. With the view of remedying a defect due to the metal of which these weights are made, a defect which must at least apply to the grain series in brass, De Grave is about to introduce this series in alu¬ minum, which promises to supply a want and meet a recognized difficulty that applies to the metal of which these weights have hitherto been composed. In the heavier weights, from 3ij to 7)ss, the relative loss by oxidation is less appreciable, but nevertheless, a loss does occur, and the same maker proposes to meet this defect by using for this series German silver. The first cost will necessarily be greater than for the same weights made of the usual metal, but this will be a very trifling matter as com¬ pared with their greater cleanliness and lesser tendency to change of value from oxidation of their surfaces. Some attention has also been given to the scale beams, which are now being very generally nickel plated. By a dispenser who has acquired habits of neatness and cleanliness these improvements in appliances for the counter will be hailed with satisfaction and they will be, to a certain extent, compensation for the annoyances to which the recent Act, from its in¬ quisitorial character, must necessarily subject him whilst engaged in his daily occupation. The prescription, No. 424, regarding which “ Vis” asks a question, is very similar to that commented on in the last “ Month,” but with this difference, that whereas in the former case a basic salt containing iron was thrown down, in consequence of a deficient supply of acid, in this one there is acid, sulph. dil. ordered, in which the quinine should be first dis¬ solved, and the precipitate referred to will not occur. Sufficient dilute sulphuric acid to dissolve the quinine should be used before the quinine is mixed with the’ tincture of iron. This prescription and that of No. 420 may be studied together by the dispenser, as' the difference in result will afford useful matter for reflection. Iodide of potassium with quinine is a combination that has, on several occasions, previously been re¬ ferred to. G. H. will find in the Index, under Dispensing Memoranda, references to pot. iodid. and quina. In the prescription, No. 425, the citrate of quinine and iron and iodide of potassium should be dissolved in separate portions of water, and mixed together with an addition of a little mucilage ; then lastly, add the sp. ammon. aromat., which, without a previous addition of mucilage, would throw the quinine out of solution and on to the sides of the bottle as a resinous mass. A decomposition will slowly take place, with the formation of what is usually called hydriodate of quinine, but the pre¬ sence of mucilage will diffuse the quinine on its separation, and retard the other changes referred to. The mixture, No. 426, will be clear until the tinctures are added, when a slight opacity will take place, resulting mainly from the separation of the resinous matter of the nux vomica, thrown out of the alcoholic tincture on its addition to the water; the mixture will, from this circumstance, be slightly turbid, but the flocculent matter will in a little time subside, and leave the fluid clear. If the tincture of nux vomica be properly prepared, there will be in this mixture at once a certain amount of opalescence, and a flocculent matter will afterwards be deposited. The ointment of ung. zinci benzoat., No. 427, referred to by C. B., has been very satisfactorily ex¬ plained in the following week’s Journal by several August 7, 1880.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 113 correspondents. The ung. zinci, B.P., should he used, the “ benzoat.” referring to the benzoated lard with which the ointment is directed to be made, and of which the prescriher may either not have been aware, or he may have intended to emphasize the fact that he wished this ointment to be made with ben¬ zoated lard. It is considered that the benzoin has a preservative tendency when combined with lard, and C. B., on referring to the Pharmacopoeia will find that some ointments are directed to be made with prepared lard, and others with benzoated lard. The subject merits more consideration that it has as yet received; many medical practitioners strongly object to the use of benzoated lard in making zinc ointment for their prescriptions, and it is stated, from practical experience, that the Ointment thus made irritates an abraded surface, whilst the zinc ointment made with prepared lard, in a proper condition, is a very soothing application. Salicylate of quinine illustrates a remark in the last “Month” on the dispensing difficulties with new remedial agents. In this instance, No. 428, the salicylate of quinine should be rubbed in a mortar with a little mucilage, and diffused through the mixture. It will gradually deposit, and the bottle should therefore be shaken before each dose. The querist in this instance should have stated the different methods of mixing which he had tried in his efforts to make a presentable mixture, the reply could then have been better suited to his par¬ ticular difficulty. It has been stated, quite recently, in reply to a dispensing query, that in a combination of tinct. ferri muriat. with acid, phosph. dilut., as in No. 429, a precipitation of ferri phosphas takes place. The remarks of Mr. Watson Will on the “equation” may be read by “ Pharmakon ” with advantage. In prescription, No. 430, care must be taken that the acid, phenic. be in crystals ; then each one of the ingredients being powdered separately they should be mixed separately. The phenic acid will liquefy and moisten the other powders, the result being, not a powder, as was most probably intended by the writer, but a soft mass, inelegant and unsatisfactory. Sufficient attention is not generally given to the carbolic acid. In the B. Plunder carbolic acid, of which phenic acid is the synonym, its characters are described as those of colourless acicular crystals, absorbing moisture on exposure to the air ; when, therefore, it is prescribed, either in a powder or in pills, care should be taken that the crystals be used and that they be free from moisture. Permanganate of potash— in reply to “ Oxygen,” No. 431, — may, as has already been stated by corre¬ spondents, be made into pills with Canada balsam, but cacao butter is to be preferred. With this sub¬ stance a very nice pill mass can be made, which by careful manipulation may be rolled into pills and afterwards covered with French chalk. The pills are quite white and retain their shape, whilst the per¬ manganate is not decomposed. One of such pills, placed in cold water, in a very few minutes gives out its intense colour to the fluid in which it is immersed. The manipulation required in No. 432 will be very similar to that of No. 425, though in this there is no ammonia, and consequently there is not that characteristic separation of the quinine to be ap¬ prehended. Still there will be a decomposition as regards the pot. iod. and quinae sulph., as previously indicated, which cannot be altogether prevented, but may be much retarded by the presence of mucilage of acacia. The prescription, No. 433, presents some diffi¬ culties m forming from it an elegant mixture. If the quinine be dissolved in the tinct. ferri acetat. , it will be thrown out on the addition of the potassse citras, and float on the surface of the fluid; thus will be formed an inelegant mixture. But if the quinine be dissolved in just sufficient dilute acid for this purpose, before being added to the tincture, an elegant mixture of a green colour will result. Even from this, on standing, the quinine will to some extent crystallize out on the sides of the bottle, which can be obviated by the addition of a little mucilage to the finished mixture. The remarks just made as regards the prior solu¬ tion of the quinine will apply to query No. 434. The quinine will not be fully dissolved in the liq. ferri phosph. magnet. , and on standing, most, if not all, the quinine separates and deposits ; but if the quinine be previously dissolved in sufficient acid, the separation will not take place. This course may have been adopted by the previous dispenser, who sent out the mixture without any precipitate. A protest must be entered here against the re¬ marks of a correspondent who suggests learning what was the course adopted by a previous dis¬ penser, and then “following suit.” Nothing could be more pernicious ; a dispenser should, to the best of his ability, carry out the intentions of the pre- scriber faithfully, and quite irrespective of any par¬ ticular course that may have been adopted, for the sake of appearance, by the person who previously dispensed the medicine. The question of the filtration of mixtures needs no more authority than the common sense of the dispenser. The filtration of fluid medicines to make elegant mix¬ tures is a crime ; it will in many instances render null and void the best efforts of the medical atten¬ dant for the restoration of the patient’s health, and will shake the confidence of medical men in a branch of their own profession on which they have been wont to depend for strict accuracy in the pre¬ paration of their prescriptions. PURIFIED OLEIC ACID.* BY ERNEST C. SAUNDERS. Since the introduction of the oleates into medicine in 1872, by Professor Marshall, the demand for oleic acid has been continually increasing, and although abundance is to be had of a common quality, pure oleic acid is as much unknown now as before the advent of the oleates into the list of remedial agents. As it is suggested in the Report on the Revision of the U. S. Pharmacopoeia that oleic acid should be admitted into the next Pharma¬ copoeia, with the further suggestion that an Acidum Oleicum Purificatum be also introduced, I offer the following formula for the preparation of the latter, which I have used in its present form for about three years. I may first remark that the methods of preparing pure oleic acid given in the various chemical works are in all cases tedious and expensive. With one exception, all that I have seen are based on the fact that oleate of lead is soluble in ether, and lead margarate is insoluble in the same. The exception is in Ure’s Dictionary, but as his process is suggested for obtaining the acid from a source (mutton fat) far richer in stearine than in oleine, I shall not notice it. Mr. Charles Rice, in 1873, proposed the purification of crude commercial oleic acid by cooling and * Reprinted from New Remedies, June, 1880. ] 14 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [August 7, 18S0. expression. One principal objection to this is that com¬ mercial oleic acid has a very disagreeable smell, which is not got rid of at all. Besides this, though most of the margaric acid may be taken out, all is not, and while absolute chemical purity is not strictly necessary in a medicine, it is certainly desirable to approach it as nearly as possible when this can be done easily without adding to the expense of the product. The common method of preparing pure oleic acid given in text-books is as follows : Saponify oil, olive or almond preferably, with alkali, decompose with hydrochloric acid, digest the crude acid with half its weight of lead oxide, dissolve in ether, filter, decompose the filtrate with hydrochloric acid, filter again, evaporate the ether, and wash the residue thoroughly with water. This is necessarily a costly process, as it is impossible to prevent • the loss of a large percentage of ether, while it is besides very tedious. Having some years ago to prepare a con¬ siderable quantity of the acid, I tried to shorten and cheapen the above process. It occurred to me that in white castile soap we have an abundant source of oleic acid, and that it would be cheaper to use it than to saponify the oil myself. I found on experiment that the affinity of margaric acid for lead oxide is stronger than that of oleic acid, and that if margaric acid be added to a solution of oleate of lead in oleic acid, it takes pos- sesssion of the lead, displacing the other acid. I also found that alcohol of -820 specific gravity could be substituted for ether, as lead oleate is soluble in it, while lead margarate is not. From these data, I constructed the following process : Decompose a solution of white castile soap with excess of sulphuric acid, separate the oily liquid, and dissolve in it five per cent of the weight of the soap of lead oxide, heating as little as possible, dissolve in alcohol, and filter after twenty-four hours. Decompose the filtrate with hydrochloric acid, wash with water, which causes the complete separation of the oleic acid from the alcohol, and filter. It will be observed that my process differs from the usual one in the use of previously saponified oil, of a much smaller proportion of lead oxide, and a consequently smaller quantity of liquid to separate the margarate of lead, and lastly the substi¬ tution of alcohol for ether. The practical formula is as follows : Cut up 5 pounds of white castile soap, and put it into 20 pounds of boiling water over a fire. Add 10 ounces of sulphuric acid, and boil with constant stirring till two clear layeis are formed. Decant the upper layer, shake with five pounds of hot water, and again decant the oily liquid. In it dissolve 4 ounces of lead oxide with a gentle heat, and while hot pour it into 5 pounds of alcohol of *820, previously heated to 150° F. Let stand twenty-four hours and filter, pressing the residue strongly. To the clear solution add 1 ounce of hydrochloric acid, and shake thoroughly. Then mix with 10 pounds of water, decant the acid, again wash with 10 pounds of water, and filter the oleic acid. The alcohol used is entirely separated from the acid by the water, and can be recovered by dis¬ tillation. The product will be about 2| pounds of pure oleic acid, of a pale-yellow colour, and almost inodorous, there being but a faint smell of olive oil. It is of specific gravity *897 and answers all the tests showing freedom from the solid fatty acid. Precipitated oxide of mercury is freely soluble in it without any decompo¬ sition. Continued exposure to the air lowers the freezing point, as Professor Miller states in his ‘Elements of Chemistry,’ but I do not find that it acquires the brown colour and rancid odour he says it does at the same time. By putting \ pound of freshly burned wood charcoal into the alcoholic liquid obtained and allowing it to macerate twenty-four hours before distilling, the alcohol is recovered nearly odourless. With care the loss of alcohol is very slight. I find from my laboratory book that of 40 pounds of alcohol at *820 used in one operation on 43 pounds soap 35J pounds were recovered, of course in a diluted state. Benzin cannot be substituted for alcohol, as lead margarate is soluble in it to a consider¬ able degree. In one of my early experiments I found that commercial benzin left in the oil a very persistent smell, which I could not remove. I have since taken advantage of this to prepare purified benzin. Ten gallons benzin mixed with 1 gallon cotton-seed oil, subjected to slow distillation till 9 gallons have come over, yield a benzin which evaporates without leaving any smell. The same oil can be used three times, but then seems to become so impregnated with the impurities of the benzin as to lose its effect. It will be noticed that I have assumed the solid fat of olive oil to be margarin. I have done it for convenience, not as expressing a decided opinion that it is the correct view. PODOPHYLLIN.* BY I. GUARESCHI. The author has examined the podophyllin of commerce obtained from Podophyllum, peltatum, and finds it consists of two substances, a resin soluble in ether, and a glucoside which is not soluble in ether. This glucoside is decom¬ posed by the action of emulsin, or when boiled with dilute sulphuric acid ; in the latter case, the solution on cooling deposits a white powder, whilst the sugar remains dis¬ solved. The product of the decomposition of the glucoside is soluble in alcohol and also in boiling water, being deposited again as the solution cools ; it has not been examined. When commercial podophyllin is fused with potash and treated in the usual way, it yields a small quantity of a product which seems to contain hydroxysalicylic acid, parahydroxybenzoic acid and pyrocatechol. The author considers that the glucoside in podophvllin resembles convolvulin and turpethin. » NASAL BOUGIES. BACILLA CUNEIFORMIA NASALIA. Under these names are described a kind of bougies, used for introduction into the no3e. They are from 8 to 10 centimetres long. The shape is cylindrical, but some¬ what cone-shaped, having a diameter of about 3 to 4 millimetres at the point and increasing towards the base to 6 to 8 millimetres. The following examples are given in the Pharmaceutische Zeitung, vol. xxv., p. 194 : — Carbolized Nasal Bougies. R Gelatinae albae . 55‘0 grams. Glycerinae . 30'0 „ Aquae destillatae . 20 ’0 ,, Reduce to a gelatinous mass by heating in a closed vessel in a water- bath, and add — - Acidi carbolici puri .... 0'2 grams. Pour into glass moulds or moulds made of paraffined paper so as to make fifteen rods, 8 to 10 centimetres long and about 5 millimetres in diameter, and slightly cunei¬ form. For excessive or fetid discharge from the nose. Tannin Nasal Bougies. R Acidi tannici . 2'0 grams. Tragacanthae . 6'5 „ Radicis althaeae . 2 0 „ Mix and add — - Glycerinae . 6'0 „ Aquae destillatae . 3'5 „ Make four cuneiform rods 8 centimetres long. To be moistened before introduced into the nose. Bacilla cuneiformia zincica. R Gelatinae albae . - . . . . . 60'0 grams. Glycerinae . 40-0 „ Aquae destillatae . 20'0 „ Zinci sulfurici . 0’5 „ Mix, s. a., and make twenty cuneiform rods 8 centi¬ metres long. * Gazzetca, 10, 16—20. Reprinted from the Journal of the Chemical Society, J uly, 1880. August 7, 1886.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 115 CIjc ipjrarntamtlkal fourmit. - ♦ - SATURDAY, AUGUST 7, 1880. Communications for the Editorial department of this Journal, boolcs for review, etc., should be addressed to the Editor, 17, Bloomsbury Square. Instructions from Members and A ssociates respecting the transmission of the Journal should be sent to Mr. Elias Bremridge, Secretary, 17 , Bloomsbury Square, W.C. Advertisements, and payments for Copies of the Journal \, Messrs. Chcrchill, New Burlington Street, London, W. Envelopes indorsed “ Pharm. Journ .” INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CONGRESS. At the meeting of the International Medical Con¬ gress, held last September, at Amsterdam, under the Presidency of Professor Donders, of Utrecht, a unanimous desire was expressed that the next meet¬ ing should take place in Great Britain in 1881 ; and we now learn that this desire, having been commu¬ nicated to the Presidents of the Royal Colleges of Physicians and Surgeons in London, they convened a meeting of delegates from the various Universities, Colleges, and other public bodies of the United Kingdom, including the principal Medical Societies, though no official communication has been made to the Pharmaceutical Society on this subject, we have reason for stating that there is a desire on the part of the Executive Committee for the co-operation of the Pharmaceutical Society in some way. This circumstance seems to offer considerable inducement for again taking into consideration the question whether the International Pharmaceutical Congress, already decided upon as to be held in London, cannnot be held simultaneously with the Medical Congress, and if practicable with some such associa¬ tion with the Pharmaceutical section of the Medical Congress as to be beneficial both from a medical and a pharmaceutical point of view. Our readers will perceive that this subject has attracted the attention of the Council, and that it is referred to a committee to deal with as may be desirable. From the terms of the resolution passed by the Council, on Wednesday, it may be taken as decided that the invitation given by the Council in 1879 is to be repeated for 1881, and we trust that no unfore¬ seen circumstances may arise as was the case on the former occasion to interfere with the successful carrying out of this project for which there seems now to be such a favorable opportunity. the British Medical Association, and the Medi¬ cal Departments of the Army, Navy, and India Office, with the object of obtaining, in this way, a thoroughly national representation of feeling and opinion on the subject. It appears that a most cordial response was given to this appeal from all quarters, and that at the meeting of delegates thus convened, it was decided to comply with the wish expressed at the Amsterdam meeting, and to hold a congress in London. A general committee of organization was then appointed, together with an executive committee, and a recep¬ tion committee to carry out the necessary details. Pier Majesty the Queen has graciously given proof of her goodwill towards the cause of medical science and the efforts for its furtherance by allowing the Congress to be placed under her Royal patronage. The Prince of Wales has also shown his interest in the undertaking by according a similar favour. From these and other circumstances it is probable that a large number of distinguished men will be attracted to England from all countries on the occa¬ sion, and the attendance of our own countrymen from all parts of the United Kingdom, India and the Colonies will probably be large. The days of meeting are to extend from Wednes¬ day the 3rd of August to Tuesday the 9th of August inclusive, and the several meetings will be held in the Halls of the University of London, the Rooms of the Royal Society, the Society of Antiquaries, the Astronomical Society, the Linntean, Chemical and Geological Societies. Among the sections in which the preceedings of the Congress will be carried on there is to be one devoted to Materia Medica and Pharmacology, and BRITISH PHARMACEUTICAL CONFERENCE. We are informed by the Honorary Secretaries that the papers in the following list have already been promised for the Swansea meeting. 1. Further Notes on Petroleum Spirit and Analogous Liquids. A. H. Allen, F.I.C., F.C.S. 2. The Detection of Amorphous Quinine in Ferri et Quinice Citras. J. De Vrij, Ph.D. 3. Note on the Presence of Arsenic in Tincture and Solution of Perchloride of Iron. F. W. Fletcher, F.C.S. 4. The Gravimetric Estimation of Minute Quantities of Arsenicum. F. W. Fletcher, F.C S. 5. Notes on the Essential Oil of Buchu Leaves. Pro¬ fessor Fluckiger, Ph.D. 6. Notes on the Constitution of Peppermint Oil. Professor Fluckiger, Ph.D. and J. B. Power, Ph.D. 7. A Sample of Cayenne Pepper. T. Greenish, F.C.S., F.R.M.S. 8. Note on Indian Henbane. T. Greenish, F.C.S., F.R.M.S. 9. Note on the Restoration of Discoloured Syrup of Iodide of Iron. T. B. Groves, F.C.S. 10. The Cultivation of Cinchona Calisaya. J. E. Howard, F.R.S. 11. Observations in Pharmacy. G. A. Keyworth, F.C.S. 12. The Green Extracts of the Pharmacopoeia. W. A. H. Naylor, F.C.S. 13. New and Unofficial Pharmaceutical Preparations. C. Symes, Ph.D. 14. Report on Commercial Specimens of Sal Volatile aud Chloric Ether. J. C. Thresh, F.C.S. 15. The Nature of the Substance in Cinnamon Bark which possesses the Power of Decolorizing Iodine. J. C. Thresh, F.C.S. 16. Report on the Strength of Commercial Specimens of Aqua Lauro-Cerasi. J. Woodland, F.L.S., F.C.S. 17. The Strength and Purity of the Alkaline Solutions of Potash and Ammonia met with in Pharmacy. J. Woodland, F.L.S., F.C.S. 18. Report on the Aconite Alkaloids. C. R. A. Wright, D.Sc., F.I.C., F.C.S. 116 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [August 7, 1880. Crmtsattimis of tbc ^barntamttixal SocictD. 'O MEETING OF THE COUNCIL. Wednesday, August 4, 1880. ME. THOMAS GEEENISH, PRESIDENT. MR. GEORGE FREDERICK SCHACHT, VICE-PRESIDENT. Present — Messrs. Andrews, Atkins, Bottle, Churchill, Frazer, Gostling, Hampson, Hills, Mackay, Radley, Robbins, Sandford, Savage, Squire, Symes, Williams and Woolley. The minutes of the previous meeting were read and confirmed. Mr. Andrews said one of the Local Secretaries or Superintendents told him he did not know whether he was appointed until July, although the voting papers were sent in in May. The Secretary said the election did not take place until July. Mr. Andrews said the gentleman referred to had superintended a local examination, although not formally elected. The Secretary said he continued to hold office as Superintendent until July, from his previous appoint¬ ment. Nomination of a Member of Council. The first business was to nominate a gentleman to fill the vacancy caused by the resignation of Mr. Shaw. Mr. Bottle begged to nominate Mr. Edward Northway Butt, 13, Curzon Street, Mayfair. He admitted that in ordinary circumstances it would appear to be the duty of the Council, when a country member resigned, to nominate one from the same locality ; but in the present case there were reasons for not following that course. In the first place it had in Mr. Symes a most able representative, not only of Liverpool, but, as Mr. Shaw himself had been, of the interests of the Society and the trade at large. Then the question arose whether it should not seek for a country member elsewhere ; but on looking round it appeared that the northern counties were already very effectively represented, and were it desirable to choose a country member, he, for one, should be disposed to seek for one in the West of England ; but on the present occasion it seemed to him there were special reasons for choosing a member in London. The position which the Society occupied since the recent decision in the House of Lords would probably impel them at no distant date to seek an amendment of the law, and in that view it was desirable to strengthen the numbers of members of Council residing in London, not only for the purpose of advising with the President and Vice-President as occasion might arise, but also to attend at the House of Commons night after night, when the Bill was passing through it, in order to watch its progress and prevent its being mutilated or added to in a sense that was not desirable. Again, when the present Pharmacy Act was first drawn it contained a clause to the effect that only seven country members should occupy seats on the Council. At that time Mr. Reynolds, of Leeds, wrote to him and asked him to endeavour to get that number enlarged to nine ; but on considering the matter, he saw no reason why any limit should be imposed at all, and proposed accordingly that the restriction should be struck out. He then pledged himself that the country members would see that it was to their interest to have at all times an excess of London representatives ; but as time went on and facilities had been afforded for country gentlemen to attend not only the meetings of the Council, but those of committees, it had come to pass that London, instead of possessing two-thirds, only possessed about one-third of the representation. He would not say anything against that ; but remembering the readiness with which his pro¬ posal was received thirteen years ago, when he asked that the number of seats occupied by country members should not be limited, he hoped his present suggestion would be received with equal unanimity, and that it would be seconded by some of his country brethren. Mr. Savage seconded the motion. Mr. Radley had much pleasure in supporting it. Mr. Hampson quite agreed with the remarks which had fallen from Mr. Bottle, and had not a word to say against Mr. Butt ; but on the other hand he thought they should endeavour as far as possible to follow the indica¬ tions given by the votes at the recent election. On that ground he begged to propose Mr. Spink, of West¬ minster. This nomination not being seconded, the motion for the election of Mr. Butt was put and carried unanimously, and the President thereupon declared him duly elected. On the motion of Mr. Bottle it was resolved — “ That the name of Mr. Butt be added to the Pharmacy Act Amendment Committee, and also to the Benevolent Fund Committee. The following, being duly registered as Pharmaceutical Chemists, were respectively granted a diploma stamped with the seal of the Society: — Bancroft, James. Barnes, James William. Elborne, William. Fazan, Charles Herbert. Fowler, William. Hardie, James Miller. Hardwick, Arthur. Hooper, David. Price, Robert John. Slicer, Walter. Smith, John Ord. Taylor, Fred. Thornton, John. Wyatt, Charles Frederick. Elections. members. Pharmaceutical Chemists. The following, having passed the Major examination and tendered their subscriptions for the current year, were elected “ Members” of the Society : — Bancroft, James . Halifax. Hardie, James Miller . Dundee. Hooper, David . London. Price, Robert John . London. Smith, John Ord . Scarborough. Chemist and Druggist. The following registered chemist and druggist, who was in business on his own account before August 1st, 1868, having tendered his subscription for the current year, was elected a “ Member ” of the Society : — Burgess, Wallett James . London. ASSOCIATES IN BUSINESS. The following, having passed their respective examina¬ tion, being in business on their own account, and having tendered their subscriptions for the current year, were elected “ Associates in Business ” of the Society : — Minor. Hosie, John . Rangoon. Madeley, Edward S tanbury , . . London. Rees, Harding . South Norwood. Modified. Barker, Robert . Mold. Gall, Frederic . . . Carshalton. ASSOCIATES. The following, having passed the Minor examination, and tendered (or paid, as Apprentices or Students) their subscriptions for the current year, were elected “Asso¬ ciates” of the Society: — August 7, 1880.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 117 Biddles, William Byron . Reading. Crompton, Henry . Bury. Fentiman, Charles Henry . London. Gibson, Atkin Brewster . Grantham. Grover, Sydney . Lower Norwood, Hamnett, Thomas . London. Harrison, William . Wisbeach. Hopkins, John Henry . Leicester. Jones, Samuel . Flint. Livesey, James Thomas . Preston. Matthews, Charles William — London. Nettleship, Thomas William ...Bawtry. Pearce, Thomas Ellery . Tavistock. Powell, Samuel John . Swansea. Preston, Henry . Mansfield. Puntan, H. H. Cruiksha ik . Turriff. Radford, James Alfred . Birmingham. Reid, William . . Aberdeen. Roper, Robert Francis . East Stonehouse. Routly, John . Brighton. Slater, William Martin . Ipswich. Taberham, Frederick, William.. Wells. Thomas, David Robert . Aberystwith. Wilson, Thomas Whiting . Harrogate. Wilson, William Joseph . Oxford. Williamson, James . Ash. Woolcott, John Newton . Sidmouth. Woollings, Frank . London. and that the thanks of the Council be given to the depu¬ tation for the valuable information furnished. Weights and Measures Act. Mr. Savage asked leave to state what had been done in Brighton in reference to this Act, having on a former occasion informed the Council that the Town Council did not intend to put the Act in force. Since then an intima¬ tion had been received that it must be enforced, and a meeting of the General Purposes Committee was held to consider how it should be done. The result was that the inspector was to attend at the Town Hall on certain days for the purpose of inspecting weights and measures sent down to him, for which he was to be paid by the Corpora¬ tion, so that chemists and druggists would be put to no expense. All weights and measures would have to be stamped before Christmas next. At first it was decided that all inaccurate measures should be broken, but it was afterwards resolved not to insist on this, as the measures might be useful to students or others, but that they should have a special mnrk put upon them, and if they were found in use a penalty would be imposed. Reports of Committees. FINANCE. The report of this Committee was received and adopted, and sundry accounts were ordered to be paid. BENEVOLENT FUND. APPRENTICES OR STUDENTS. The following, having passed the Preliminary exami nation and tendered their subscriptions for the current year, were elected “ Apprentices or Students ” of the Society : — Bell, John Henry . Windsor. By ass, Robert . Hull. Dobb, Thomas . Sheffield. Eastland, John . Margate. Farrage, William Thomas R. ...Rothbury. Hasler, Joseph . Blackburn. Haynes, Joseph Alfred . Fairford. Hill, Edward . Lower Tottenham. Jones, George Henry . Brighton. Jones, William Alexander . Stoke-on-Trent. Layman, Ernest Blakesley . Anerley. Llewellyn, Lewis Herbert . Shrewsbury. Mossop, Samuel . Ashton -un der-Lyne . Parker, Edwin . Stoke-on-Trent. Pullan, Herbert Newman . Low Harrogate. Reynolds, Ernest James... Milton next Sittingbourne. Saltmarsh, Mark Alfred . Deal. Sant, Esdras . Pontypridd. Sharp, Stephen . Hey wood. Sherburne, John Chester . London. Spong, John Fuller . Leeds. Stacey, Ernest Lloyd . London. Stiles, Theodore Mayo . Poole. Thomas, John Griffith . Neath. Tillett, Arthur John . Market Rasen. Turnbull, William . Neweastle-on-Tyne. Turner, John F . Ramsgate. Wake, George . Howden. Wilkinson, Thomas . Crook. Willcocks, Arthur Squire . Portsea. Woodcock, Page Hornor . Norwich. Woods, Joseph James Birkett...Tunstall. Wyatt, William . Mansfield. Several persons were restored to their former status in the Society upon payment of the current year’s sub¬ scription and a fine. The Council then went into committee to consider the report of the deputation to the Board of Examiners in Scotland. On resuming, it was resolved that the report be received, The report of this Committee included a recommenda¬ tion of the following grants : — £20 to a former associate and member in distressed circumstances. £15 to a registered chemist and drugcist, aged 78, in distress, owing to the failure of a banking company. £15 for the education of the orphan son of a legistered chemist and druggist. The report and recommendations were received and adopted. Mr. Atkins asked how the Isherwood children were going on. The Secretary said he believed they were all doing very well. LIBRARY, MUSEUM AND LABORATORY. The Librarian’s report had been received, and included the following particulars : — June . Attendance. s Diy •. • * ( Evening Circulation ot b oks. No. of entries . . Carriage paid . Total. Hiabest. T.ow st. A v* race. 291 20 5 11 165 14 1 7 Tott’U. Country. Tiral. . 158 157 315 , . . . £2 Is. Qd. The following donations to toe Library had been re¬ ceived, and the Committee recommended that the usual letter of thanks be sent to the respective donors : — Treumann, C., Beitrage zur Kenntniss der Aloe, 1880. Wenckiewicz, B., Das Verhalten des Schimmelgenus Mucor zu Antisepticis und einigen verwandten Stoffen mit besonderer Beriicksichtigung eeines Verhaltens in zuckerhaltigen Fliissiukeiten, 1880. From Professor Dragendokff. Ronalds, Sir F., Catalogue of Books and Papers relating to Electricity, Magnetism, etc., edited by A. J. Frost, 1880. — Biographical Account of Sir F. Ronalds, by A. J. Frost, 1880. From the Society of Telegraph Engineers. Mac£, M., Essai sur l’Origine et la Constitution des Etres et Objets de la Nature, 1880. From the Author. Squibb, E. R., On the Relations of the Medical Profession to the Trade Interests of the Materia Medica, and Note on Pepsin, etc. [1880]. From the Author. 118 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [August 7, 1880. Massachusetts College of Pharmacy, 14th annual catalogue, 1880. From Mr. B. F. Davenport. White, J. W., Salicylic Acid in Yellow Fever [1880]. From the Author. Commentar zur osterreichischen Pharmacopoe, von F. C. Schneider und A. Vogl, 1880, Lief. 5. From Professor Vogl. American Pharmaceutical Association, Proceedings of Third Meeting, 1854. — Proceedings of Twenty-seventh Meeting, 1879. From the Association. The Committee recommended the purchase of the undermentioned works for the Library : — British Skin Hospital Pharmacopoeia, 2nd ed., 1880. Britten, J., and R. Holland, Dictionary of English Plant Names, 1878-9, and continuation. Hansen, A., Die Quebracho- Rinde, 1880. Miller, W. A., Elements of Chemistry, 5th ed., 1880, pt. 8. Rennie, J., New Supplement to the Pharmacopoeias, 3rd ed., 1833. Tuson, R. V., Veterinary Pharmacopoeia, 3rd ed., 1880. The Committee also recommended that the Librarian do attend the annual meeting of the Library Association, to be held in Edinburgh at the end of September or beginning of October. The Curator’s report had been received, and included the following particulars : — Attendance. Highest. Lowest. Average. T 1 Day . . 24 1 12 une . . | Evening 8 1 3 The following donations to the Museum had been re¬ ceived, and the Committee recommended that the usual letter of thanks be sent to the respective donors : — Herbarium specimen of the Rose of Jericho (Anasta- tica hierochuntina). From Mr. W. Jackson, Creditor). Fresh specimens of biennial Henbane. From Messrs. Battley and Watts. Specimens of unnamed South American Drugs. From Messrs. Wyleys and Co., Coventry Specimens of Nepal Cardamoms; Pods of Prosopis siliquastrum ; Roots of Ionidium Ipecacuanha. From Messrs. Geo. Curling and Co. Specimens of Indian Atturs or Essential Oils. From Professor Archer, Edinburgh. A Kneading and Mixing Machine. From Mr. Pfleiderer. Specimens of perfect crystals of Sulphate of Copper and Alum. From Mr. W. Read, Landport. The Curator reported that he had distributed numerous specimens of duplicate Indian Drugs to the following : — The North British Branch. The Leicester Chemists’ Assistants’ Association. The Liverpool Chemists’ Association. To the Materia Medica Museums of University Hos¬ pital, St. George’s Hospital and London Hospital. To the Botanical Museum of St. Bartholomew’s Hos¬ pital. Professor Bentley. „ Bommer, of Brussels. . , Davidson, of Aberdeen. „ Dragendorff, of Dorpat. „ Fllickiger, of Strassburg. „ Herlandt, of Brussels. „ Oberdorffer, of Hamburg. „ Planchon, of Paris. „ Soubeiran, of Montpellier. Dr. Vogl, of Vienna. Herr Dittrich, of Prague. The Council went into Committee to consider the re¬ port. On resuming, the report and recommendations were received and adopted. It was also resolved that a letter from Professor Attfield, with regard to the Society’s School, be entered on the minutes. GENERAL PURPOSES. The report of this Committee included the usual report from the Solicitor as to the progress of cases placed in his hands. In the case of Wright, of Liverpool, and that of Copping, of Manchester, the amount of penalty and costs had been recovered.* The Secretary also reported on several cases of alleged infringement of the Act, in some of which the Committee recommended that proceedings be commenced. The Committee had also received the reports from the Professors as to the prize examinations, and had opened the motto envelopes to ascertain the names of the succesful competitors. The reports were to the following effect : — Chemistry and Pharmacy. In the examination for the bronze medal and certifi¬ cates there were five competitors, three of whom obtained respectively 86, 78 and 75 marks out of 100. In the ex¬ amination for the silver medal and certificates, seven papers of considerable merit had been received. The conduct of the class throughout the session had been highly satisfactory. Botany and Materia Medica. In this examination the Professor reported that the average of the marks obtained had been high, 92 being obtained by the most successful competitor. The same remarks applied to the examination for the ten months’ course, in which six candidates were worthy of special distinction. The good conduct, regularity of attendance, punctuality, diligence and progress of the students, had been highly satisfactory. Herbarium Prize. For this prize there were five competitors. The first collection contained 880 specimens and was of great merit ; as regards variety of ferns, the best ever sub¬ mitted. Mi*. Drew’s collection consisted of about 480 specimens and Mr. Leech’s of 420. The latter, however, was slightly superior in arrangement and preservation, and the two were therefore placed equal. A fourth col¬ lection contained 334 specimens and was well worthy of a certificate. Practical Chemistry. For this examination seventeen candidates presented themselves, all of whom came through it with credit, and eight were worthy of special mention. A copy of the questions was appended to the report. Council Examination Prizes. In this examination there were nine competitors, all of whom had been examined in l.ondon. The report of the Committee included a list of those to whom it recommended that prize awards should be made. The Solicitor attended the Council and reported that Sir John Holker had returned his brief in the case of the Society v. the London and Provincial Supply Association, with an expression of his great regret that other engage¬ ments had rendered impossible his presence at the bar of the House of Lords, to take part in the argument. The Council went into committee to consider the legal portion of the report as usual. On resuming, the report and recommendations of the Committee were received and adopted. Prize Awards. The following awards were made on the recommenda¬ tion of the General Purposes Committee : — Chemistry and Pharmacy. [Five months’ course.] Bronze Medal . Thomas Hart. Certificate, of Merit . j£olm fH®nry C*#?’ ' ( Ernest fired enck Salmon. * See ante, x., ll)51, and xi., 39. August 7, 1880.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 119 [Ten months’ course.] Silver Medal Certificates of Honour Certificates of Merit William Fowler. / Robert Wright. \ John Thomas. I William Elborue. ( David Hooper. J’Edwd. Chas. Jas. Davies. V Wm.Hodgkinson Jackson Botany and Materia Medica. [Five months’ course.] Bronze Medal . John Henry Garrett. {Alfred Hornby. John Henry Chaplin. Thomas Hart. [Ten months’ course.] Silver Medal . David Hooper. William Elborne. • ( William Fowler. | \ John Henry Garrett. w ( Robert Wright. Certificate of Merit . John Thomas. Certificates of Honour Practical Chemistry. Silver Medal . . Bronze Medals . Certificate of Honour Certificates of Merit David Hooper, i Robert Wright. | John Thomas. Thomas Burrell. ! Wm.Hodgkinson Jackson John Henry Chaplin. Thomas Hart. Botanical Prize. Silver Medal ...... Bronze Medals ... Certificate of Merit John Hutchinson. | j Walter Clark Drew. g1 ( John Henry Leech. James Thomas Bays. Council Examination Prizes. Pereira Medal (silver) ; and Books value £5, presented by Mr. T. H. Hills. David Hooper. Pharmaceutical Society's Medal (silver) ; and Books value £3, presented by Mr. T. H. Hills. Henry William Drew. Pharmaceutical Society's Medal (bronze) ; and Books value £2, presented by Mr. T. H. Hills. William Fowler. Fharmacy Act Amendment. The Vice-President thought it would be desirable to pass a resolution with reference to the recent decision of the House of Lords. He would therefore move — “That the Special Committee appointed to consider improvements in the Pharmacy Act, 1868, be re¬ quested to take into consideration the recent decision of the House of Lords, in the appeal case “ Pharma- eutical Society v. The London and Provincial Supply Association,” and its probable effect on the future of pharmacy, and to report to the Council any course they might think it desirable this Society should adopt.” He had originaly drawn the motion requesting the Committee to report to the President, instead of the Council, in case it might be deemed advisable to take any immediate action, but that question he would leave to the decision of the Council. Mr. Frazer said he should object to any step being taken without full consideration. Mr. Hampson seconded the motion, but thought all necessary purposes would be answered if the Committee reported to the Council in the ordinary way. It would be impossible to move rapidly ; everything must be done with due deliberation. They must certainly not rest content with the present condition of things, and he hoped they would all feel a strong determination to do the best they could under the circumstances. The recent decision was not only a blow against pharmacy but also against the medical profession. Mr. Symes supported the resolution. Mr. Atkins thought there could not be two opinions about the desirability of the Committee considering this matter. He should support the resolution not only on the grounds mentioned, but because there was con¬ siderable discontent amongst medical men as to the existing state of the law, there being nineteen licensing bodies at present. Mr. Gostling also supported the resolution. They ought to take the matter into most serious consideration, not only in their own interests but in the interests of the public. The motion was then agreed to unanimously. HOUSE. The report of this Committee was adopted. It simply recommended the payment of certain accounts for work done to the premises. Jacob Bell Memorial Scholarships. The Committee appointed to award these scholarships subject to the approval of the Council reported that the examination was held on July 6, when nineteen can¬ didates competed, viz., in Birmingham, 1 ; Bristol, 2 ; Canterbury, 1 ; Exeter, 1 ; Leeds, 2 ; Lincoln, 1 ; London, 10; Peterborough, 1. The Committee called attention to the exceedingly satisfactory results of the competition. In many previous years it had been a matter of regret that the number of competitors had been very small. The number on this occasion had been altogether unprece¬ dented, and not only so, but the papers returned had been of very high average merit ; no less than nine of the competitors having obtained more than the number of marks necessary to obtain a scholarship. Under these special circumstances the Committee recommended that as only two scholarships are awarded, the mottoes of the other seven competitors who have distinguished themselves be published in the order in which they stand, as a recognition of the general merits of their papers. The mottoes adopted by the two candidates who had obtained the highest number of marks were “ Ignota tentare" and “ Ne quid nimis." The Committee having ascertained that those mottoes had been respectively adopted by — Frederick Charles Bird and John Oldham Braithwaite, recommended that the scholarships for 1880-81 be awarded to them. The Council received and confirmed the award of the scholarships by the Committee and also resolved to pub¬ lish, alphabetically, the names of the seven candidates who stood next in order of merit. The names are as follows : — Edward Baily. William Edward Gillson Jackson. Joseph Pemberton. Edward John Wall. Frederick Walmsley Warrick. Francis Watts. Robert Wright. Superintendents of Written Examinations. The following list of Superintendents and Deputy- Superintendents of written examinations for the ensuing year was agreed to : — Aberdeen . Davidson, Charles. Birmingham . Southall, William. Brighton . . Gwatkin, James Ross. Bristol . Stroud, John. Cambridge . Deck, Arthur. Canterbury . . Bing, Edwin. THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 120 [August 7, 1880 Cardiff . Carlisle . Carmarthen . Carnarvon . Cheltenham . Darlington . Douglas, Isle of Man Dundee . Edinburgh . Exeter . Glasgow . Guernsey . Hull . Inverness . Jersey . Lancaster . Leeds . Lincoln . Liverpool . London . Manchester . Newcastle-on-Tyne .. Northampton . Norwich . Nottingham . . Oxford . Peterborough . Sheffield . Shrewsbury . Southampton . Truro . Worcester . York . . . Hollway, Albert Brown. ..Thompson, Andrew. ..Davies, Richard Morgan. ..Lloyd, William. ..Smith, Nathaniel. ..Robinson, James. ..Breary, William A. ..Hardie, James. ..Mackay, John. . . Delves, George. . . Kinninmont, Alexander. ..Arnold, Adolphus. , Bell, Charles Bains. ..Galloway, George Ross. ..Ereaut, John, jun. . ..Bagnall, William Henry ..Reynolds, Richard. ..Maltby, Joseph. ..Symes, Cbarles. ..Taylor, George Spratt. ..Wilkinson, William. ..Martin, Nicholas Henry. . .Bingley, John. ..Sutton, Francis. ..FitzHugh, Richard. ..Prior, George Thomas. ..Heanley, Marshall. , . .Ward, William. ...Cross, William Gowen. ...Dawson, Oliver Robert. . . . Percy, Thomas Biclde. ...Virgo, Charles. ...Davison, Ralph. Deputy-Superintendents of Written Examinations. Aberdeen . Birmingham . Brighton ...: . Bristol . Cambridge . Canterbury . Cardiff . Carlisle . Carmarthen . Carnarvon . Cheltenham . Darlington . Douglas, Isle of Man Dundee . Edinburgh . Exeter . Glasgow . Guernsey . Hull . Inverness . Jersey . Lancaster . Leeds . Lincoln . Liverpool . London . Manchester . Newcastle-on-Tyne . Northampton . Norwich . Nottingham . Oxford . Peterborough . Sheffield . Shrewsbury . Southampton . Truro . Worcester . York . . Kay, James Petrie. Churchill, William John. Savage, William Wallace. .Tucker, Robert Lewis. .Church, Henry Jame«. .Amos, Daniel. .Saunders, William Josiah. Hallaway, John. .Davies, R. Morgan, jun. .Hughes, Richard. .Barron, William. .Hutchinson, Rev. E. Brearey, Arthur W. .Kerr, Charles. Ainslie, William. .Lake, John Hinton. .Davison, Thomas. .Collenette, Adolphus. .Baynes, James. .Galloway, George. Ereaut, John. Hall, William. .Smeeton William. .Battle, John Scoley. .Sumner, Robert. Bremridge, Richard. Knapman, John W. Holmes, Edward M. .Wilkinson, George .Stuart, Charles Edward. .Mayger, William W. .Corder, Octavius, .h’ayner, John. .Thurland, Thomas Henry. .Buckle, George F. .Maleham, Henry. .Cross, W. Gowen, jun. .Spearing, James. .Fiddick, Thomas. .Lunn, Thomas. .Sowray, Joseph. Report op Examinations. July , 1880. ENGLAND AND WALES. Candidates. Examined. Passed. Failed. Major, (8th) . ... 10 5 5 „ (9th) . . . . 11 2 9 „ (13th) . ... 7 6 1 — 28 —13 —15 Minor, (8th) . ... 13 3 10 „ (9th) . . . . 15 4 11 „ (13th) . . . . 18 5 13 „ (14th) . . . . 26 10 16 „ (15th) . . . . 26 10 16 „ (16th) . , . . 23 14 9 —121 —46 —75 Modified, (8th) . . . 1 0 1 — — — 150 59 Scotland. Candidates. 91 Examined. Passed. Failed. Major, (13th) . . . . 2 1 1 Minor, (13th) . ... 9 4 5 „ (14th) . ... 9 6 3 „ (15th) . . . . 10 6 4 —28 —16 —12 Modified, (15th) ... 2 1 1 32 18 14 Preliminary Examination. Candidates. Examined. Passed. Failed. 341 167 174 3 certificates in lieu of the Society’s examination had been received: — University of Cambridge . 1 University of Glasgow . 1 University of Oxford . 1 The Council then went into committee during the perusal of a letter bearing on the subject of the examina¬ tions, which had been sent to the President with a request that it might be read to the Council. Reports of Benevolent Fund Committee. Mr. Symes moved in accordance with a notice : — “ That the report of the Benevolent Fund Committee be read in a more condensed form than hitherto.” He had always held that it was unnecessary the Council should spend so much valuable time in going again over details which were examined in Committee. He did not begrudge time being spent on important matters, but when he saw matters of great importance hurried over because the Council were getting towards the end of the day, and that it had been brought to the end of the day by interposing matters of routine which had been already fully dealt with, he thought if only a matter of ten minutes could be saved it would facilitate business and be worth doing. He would suggest that the only details given should be the name and address and age of the candidate, with previous occupation, if any. When they were read if any member were interested in any special case, he would ask some further questions about it, as had been done hitherto; but in the majority of cases the four or five particulars he had mentioned would be ample. Mr. Radley thought the Council might have some sympathy with this motion though it might not agree with the exact restrictions named. If they were expressed in general terms without laying down an absolute rule, it would be quite sufficient. Long letters need not be read, or any minute detail, but the Council must not go too far in the direction of abridgment. Mr. Williams said the minutes of this Committee were August 7, 1SS0. ] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 121 made as lengthy as they were for purposes of future refer¬ ence. The question arose who was to have the responsi¬ bility of cutting down the real minutes. It was rather a serious matter, and one involving a principle, and he thought the Council should have the reports of all Com¬ mittees accurately presented to the Council. There might be some mere matters of routine included ; but as the reading did not occupy more than ten minutes, and sometimes not more than three, he thought it was a pity to give up a great principle without some better reason than they had yet heard given. He would ask Mr. Symes to reconsider the matter. Mr. Symes said the principle had been broken through already in several cases, matters of detail having been passed over in reading the reports. Mr. Williams said it was competent to the ’Council at any time to authorize the omission of matters of detail being read, but that was very different to hurriedly laying down a general rule. Mr. Mackay said no member of the Council was more desirous of saving time than he was, but at the same time he should be very sorry to find the minutes of the Benevolent Fund Committee shortened in any way. It was one of the most important branches of the Society’s work, and though the Committee was a large one, and was generally well attended, still there were something like ten members who were not on the Committee, and to whom it would be a source of gratification to hear the minutes read. He should be obliged to vote against the motion. Mr. Savage took it the report would appear as usual in the book ; it would be only shortened in the reading. The President said he should be sorry to see the records of any Committee cut down at all. At the same time there was some reason in Mr. Symes ’s motion, and it might be understood, now that the matter had been ventilated, that in reading these reports some extraneous matters might, at the discretion of the President, be left out, but he deprecated any resolution being passed on the subject. Mr. Symes said, if it were accepted as a principle, in deference to the view of the President, he was prepared to withdraw the resolution, but the fact was that, when he first made the suggestion, he was over-ruled, and told he could not speak to it unless he proposed a resolution, and now he put it in the form of a resolution, he was told the Council ought not to make a hard and fast line, but it ought to be merely a suggestion, so that he did not exactly know which was right. In reading the report of the Library, Museum and Laboratory Committee, that day, the Secretary, very properly no doubt, passed over certain lists, which he said would be published in the J ournal. The President said they were lists of books, etc., which were all published in extenso in the Journal. Mr. Symes said, on the understanding that his sugges¬ tion would be adopted, he should be happy to withdraw the motion. International Pharmaceutical Congress. Mr. Hampson drew attention to the fact that the International Medical Congress would meet in London next year, and he saw that one of the sections of the Congress was Materia Medica and Pharmacology. Now, in 1874, the Council passed a resolution that the Inter¬ national Pharmaceutical Congress should be invited to hold their next meeting in England. He thought that it would be very desirable that the Pharmaceutical Con¬ gress should be held about the same time that the Medical Congress would be held, and he moved that another invitation should be sent. The President said as he was the delegate sent to the Congress at St. Petersburg, he could perhaps give some information on this subject. He gave the delegates present on that occasion an invitation, subject to its being approved by this Council, that the next meeting should be held in London, and it was understood that that would take place in five years, which would have been in 1879, but owing to the war in which Russia was engaged and other circumstances, it was found impossible to have a satisfactory meeting here at that time, and he was advised by several distinguished foreigners not for the present to issue the invitation ; but in the early part of this year a paper was sent to Mr. Sandford, as President, in connection with the International Medical Congress, which he was good enough to forward to him, and one or two other papers had since been sent by the Medical Con¬ gress to the President of this Society. It occurred to him that it would be a very good opportunity to have the In¬ ternational Pharmaceutical Congress, in London, at the same time as the International Medical Congress next year. That was exceedingly desirable, as so many medical men from the continent, taking much more interest in pharmaceutical matters than as a rule medical men in England did, would be over here attending the Medical Congress, that the Pharmaceutical Congress should be held at the same time. Mr. Hills said the President of the College of Physi¬ cians mentioned the matter of the Medical Congress to him in May last, and asked him if the Pharmaceutical Society would get up an Exhibition of Materia Medica, etc. Mr. Hills replied that the Society would be most happy to do so, and suggested that the Exhibition should take place at the Society’s house, Bloomsbury Square. Mr. Hills mentioned the subject to the late President, Mr. Sandford, but did not know whether any official notice was taken of it. Mr. Sandford said there was not. The President said that medical men were entering with great spirit into this matter, and he thought it would be an excellent opportunity to hold the Pharmaceutical Congress. He knew there were many eminent men abroad who would only be too glad of the opportunity of visiting England on such an occasion. It occurred to him that the Council might affiliate the International Pharmaceutical Congress with the Medical Congress. One principal subject, and the only one in which English pharmacists had any immediate interest at St. Petersburg, was an International Pharmacopoeia, which as it was thought a great deal of on the continent, though it did not seem to be made much of here, would be probably one of the chief points of discussion. Mr. Williams asked if there would not be a danger of one congress clashing with the other. The President thought there would not be the slightest danger of this. Mr. Hills suggested that the best plan would be for the President to see the President of the College of Physicians, and in that case he would be happy to accom¬ pany him, and to make any preliminary arrangements. It was then moved by Mr. Symes, seconded by Mr. Hampson, and carried unanimously : — “ That the Library, Museum and Laboratory Com¬ mittee be requested to make arrangements for the reception of the International Pharmaceutical Con¬ gress on the occasion of their visit to London in August, 1881.” The Pharmaceutical Conference. It was resolved, as last year, that those members of the Council, who could make it convenient to attend the Conference at Swansea, be appointed delegates. Mr. Symes suggested that many valuable specimens for the Museum might be obtained in Swansea and the neighbourhood, if someone would undertake to collect them. The President said he had heard from Mr. Holmes that he was very much indebted to Mr. Frazer for his assistance in collecting specimens for which he had been sent to Glasgow, and that the Museum would be very much enriched by those which he would bring him. 122 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [August 7, 1880. The School of Pharmacy. The Council went into committee to consider a letter from Professor Redwood, with regard to certain proposed improvements which he proposed to introduce into his course of lectures. On resuming, it was resolved unanimously that Pro¬ fessor Redwood’s suggestions be approved. The Sale of Spirits Bill. Mr. Sandford reported that he had seen the Solicitor to the Inland Revenue Board who had promised that he would get the word “such” introduced into the Bill in the clause to which reference had been made on a former occasion. Since then he bad seen a notice on the paper by Lord Frederick Cavendish to introduce the word. The Secretary said the Bill had been considered in Committee, and stood on the paper for to-morrow. The Pharmaceutical Congress at Breslau. On the motion of the Vice-President, seconded by Mr. Williams, it was resolved that : — • “The Editor and Sub-Editor should attend the An¬ nual Meeting of the German Pharmaceutical Asso¬ ciation to be held at Breslau in September.” The September Council Meeting. The President reminded the country members of the Council that it was not absolutely necessary for them to attend in September, as it was only requisite to form a quorum of seven to get through the formal business. Erratum. — Page 62, column 2, line 34, for Mears, Henry, Eastover, read Mears, Henry, Bridgwater. arliameitfarg mxir Ifrxto |gr j&mimtgs. Important Case under the Sale of Food and Drugs Act. At the Stockport Police Court, on July 21, several chemists and druggists and grocers of Stockport ap¬ peared to answer an information charging them, under the Sale of Food and Drugs Act, with having sold sweet spirits of nitre, not of the nature, substance and quality of the article demanded by the purchaser. The prosecution was conducted by the Town Clerk on behalf of the corporation, and Mr. Henry Glaisyer appeared to defend certain of the cases on behalf of the Chemists and Druggists’ Trade Association of Great Britain, instructed by the Secretary of that body. The case of Mr. Bennett, chemist and druggist, was taken first, the information charging him that on the 3rd day of June, at Stockport, he unlawfully sold to the pre¬ judice of one Jacob Marshall, the purchaser, an inspector of nuisances for the said borough, a certain drug, to wit, sweet spirits of nitre (spiritus setheris nitrosi), which was not of the nature, substance and quality of the article demanded by such purchaser, inasmuch as the said sweet spirits of nitre contained only 1*15 per cent, of nitrous ether, and was of the specific gravity of '844, whereas the quantity of nitrous ether should have been 3 per cent., and the specific gravity ’845 or thereabouts. Inspector Marshall proved the purchase and the division of the sample into three parts, one of which he delivered to the public analyst next day, whose certificate was as follows : — “I, the undersigned, public analyst for the borough of Stockport, do hereby certify that I received on the 4th day of June, 1880, from you, a sample of sweet spirits of nitre for analysis, marked B, No. 2, June 3, 1880, and have analysed the same, and declare the result of my analysis to be as follows : — I am of opinion that the said sample contained the parts as under, 1*15 per cent, nitrous ether ; specific gravity, *844. Observations. — Spiritus setheris nitrosi, according to the British Phar¬ macopoeia, should have a specific gravity of ’845, and contain not less than 3 per cent, of real nitrous ether.” On cross-examination by Mr. Glaisyer, the inspector said that defendant told him, after he had paid for the sweet spirits of nitre and divided the sample, that it was not the British Pharmacopoeia preparation ; and though he did not understand the meaning of the term at the time, he had since ascertained what was meant. William Lees, the dispenser at the Stockport In¬ firmary, said he had a good deal to do with drugs. The popular name of spiritus setheris nitrosi was spirit of nitre or sweet spirits of nitre ; and, in his opinion, if anyone went into a shop and asked for a preparation by any of those names he should get spiritus setheris nitrosi made according to the British Pharmacopoeia. He would expect to find in it about 3 per cent, of nitrous ether; and would not be satisfied if it contained only 1*15 per cent. Witness said he was not a qualified chemist. Oswald Wilkinson said he was public analyst for the borough of Stockport. On the 4th of June he received a bottle of sweet spirits of nitre similar to that produced by Inspector Marshall. He analysed the sample, and de¬ livered his certificate to the inspector personalty. That sample only contained 1*15 per cent, of real nitrous ether. He should not consider that a person buying sweet spirits of nitre would get what he wanted if he obtained an article containing only 1*15 per cent, of nitrous ether. By the Chairman : 3 per cent, of nitrous ether is a fair proportion ; it should not be less. The specific gravity of the sample was *844 instead of *845. Examination continued. The specific gravity may be kept up by adding rectified spirit. The preparation sold contained rather more than 50 per cent, less nitrous ether than it should contain. Cross-examined by Mr. Glaisyer. You say you are the public analyst ; what training have you had ?— Principally at Owens College, Manchester. How long were you there? — Six sessions. Have you any knowledge of drugs? — Yes. What knowledge? — Both practical and theoretical. Have you ever been in a pharmaceutical school? — No. What knowledge have you of drugs then, Mr. Wilkin¬ son? —I do not quite understand you ; I have both theo¬ retical and practical knowledge. What practical knowledge? — I know what they ought to be, and have often tested them. Have you frequently tested the preparations mentioned in the Pharmacopoeia? — Most of them. Have you frequently tested this preparation? — No ; I have never tested it before. Do you say you have never tested this preparation before? — I have not. Therefore you never tested this preparation at Owens College ? — No. Have you had any other training besides what you got at Owens College ? — No ; except studying chemistry at school. How long have you been appointed analyst to this borough ? — This is the third year. Do you know the history of this drug? — Yes. Tell me what you know about it ? — I profess to know all about it ; if you ask me a question I will answer you. When was spirits of nitre first heard of? — I cannot say. When was it first mentioned in the Pharmacopoeia ? — Do you mean in the British Pharmacopoeia ? In any pharmacopoeia? — I have seen it as far back as 1851. Any further? — Well, I cannot say. Do you find sweet spirits of nitre in the 1851 Pharma¬ copoeia? — Do you mean the British Pharmacopoeia? Do you find it either in Latin or in English in the 1851 Pharmacopoeia? — I cannot swear to it. Have you the words sweet spirits of nitre either in English or Latin in any Pharmacopoeia ? —I will not swear anything about the Pharmacopoeias. Is it in the London Pharmacopoeia ? — I believe it is. In what year ? — I do not know. If I tell you it is in the 1746 Pharmacopoeia, you will not contradict me? — No. August 7, 1880.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 123 And if I tell you it is the only Pharmacopoeia it is in, will you contradict me? — No. How do you know that this preparation should contain 3 p. c. of nitrous ether, how did you ascertain that? — From the British Pharmacopoeia and from other good authorities. Where does the British Pharmacopoeia give you that information? — I have not the British Pharmacopoeia. Mr.s Glaisyer: Here is the British Pharmacopoeia. (Book handed to witness). Chairman of the Bench: What edition is that? Mr. Glaisyer : It is the reprint with additions made in 1874, printed in 1877. Witness : I do not see it says 3 per cent in this Phar¬ macopoeia; it is in the other Pharmacopoeias, I believe. Mr. Glaisyer: Have you one that shows it? —No. Chairman of the Bench : Does that book give you the composition of the article ? Witness: Yes, but it does not give the percentage of nitrous ether, it gives the preparation of the article and its character and tests. Cross-examination continued. Does it state in the characters and tests that the article should contain 3 per cent, of nitrous ether? — No. Then as to other Pharmacopoeias, can you mention one giving that percentage ? — I believe the Edinburgh does. When was the Edinburgh published ? — I cannot say. I do not know. I do not profess to know anything about the date of Pharmacopoeias. How do you know then that it should contain 3 per cent., you do not find it in the British Pharmacopoeia, and you have not produced a single authority for making that statement ? — But I can. State your authority ? — Dr. Dupr£, if you think him an authority. In what work of Dr. Duprd’s do you find that ? — I can point to an article in the Analyst for July, 1879 — book pi*o- duced from which witness read — “According to my expe¬ rience we may consider a product containing 3 per cent, of nitrous ether as fairly representing the British Phar¬ macopoeia preparation, and further in judging of the purity or otherwise of any given sample of spiritus aetheris nitrosi, B.P.,the particular method of manufacture adopted in the preparation of the sample is of course perfectly im¬ material ; as long as it fairly corresponds in strength to the B.P. standard, it must be considered as of the nature, substance and quality demanded, however produced.” What evidence does Dr. Duprd give of 3 per cent, being the standard ? — He says a product containing that propor¬ tion of nitrous ether fairly represents the British Pharma¬ copoeia preparation, and that proportion is generally re¬ cognized by other chemists. What evidence have you that 3 per cent, is to be taken as a standard ? — Dr. Duprd says we may consider a pro¬ duct containing 3 per cent, of nitrous ether as fairly re¬ presenting the B.P. preparation. Chairman of the Bench : Have you found other samples to contain that percentage ? Mr. Glaisyer: This is the first sample he has analysed, he has stated that in evidence. Why do you accept Dupr manufacturer as to which way this case may be decided, we only make what the public require. Michael Conroy, manager for Messrs. Evans, Sons and Co., stated that the firm supplied defendant with sweet spirits of nitre in May last : the specific gravity of the article was ‘850. Do you make more than one preparation of spirits of nitre ? — Yes; we make sweet spirits of nitre of a specific gravity ‘850, and we also make the spirits of nitrous ether of the British Pharmacopoeia. For which have you the larger demand ? — We probably manufacture from 120 to 130 gallons per week of the old preparation compared with 3 or 4 gallons of the British Pharmacopoeia preparation. Do you sell the old preparation because you make more profit out of that ? — We make less profit per gallon by that article. Daniel Woolley, pharmaceutical chemist carrying on business at 2, Millgate, Stockport, stated that he had been in business there since 1844. Had sold as sweet spirits of nitre from that time to the present the old preparation, specific gravity *850. Kept the British Pharmacopoeia preparation and used it when ordered in prescriptions. From his experience a customer, asking for sweet spirits of nitre, wanted to have the ‘850 nitre, and would not have the other. Harvey Lowndes, pharmaceutical chemist, 7, Hall Street, Stockport, had carried on business as a chemist in the town from 1842 until 1876 : supposing a person asked for sweet spirits of nitre, would supply him with the ‘850 preparation. R. M. Sumner, a partner in the firm of Messrs. Sumner and Co., wholesale druggists and manufacturers, at Liver¬ pool, said he was wholly unconnected with this case except as a witness. He made and sold both the preparations of sweet spirits of nitre. Sold by far the larger quantity of ‘850 nitre, ordinarily known as sweet spirits of nitre. Cross-examined by the Town Clerk. Do you supply hospitals ? — Yes. What do you send to them? — The specific gravity is usually specified on the order. Mr. Glaisyer: That’s my case. May I ask the bench if they will require to ask Professor Attfield any further questions, as he wishes to catch his train to London. Chairman of the Bench: I think not. I am sure he has given his evidence very clearly and concisely. The Magistrates retired, and on their return into Court the Chairman said: The Court think the weight of evidence is in favour of the defendant, and, therefore they dismiss the case. Mr. Glaisyer applied for costs. The Magistrates’ Clerk (to the Town Clerk): Then you withdraw the cases against Eyre, Cooper, Thornwaite and Appleby. The Town Clerk : Yes ; there being a difficulty in selecting, the committee took out a number of summonses, not that they were anxious for a number of convictions, but that they did not wish to be invidious. Dr. Downs : In regard to the application for costs, the Magistrates must, as well as they can, protect the expenses of the county. Magistrates’ Clerk : Are not you bound, under a certain analysis, to institute proceedings ? Town Clerk : I think we are. Magistrates’ Clerk : In spirits and milk there is no option whatever, there is no alternative but to institute a prose¬ cution; and if it is so as regards drugs, it is a sufficient justification for a prosecution. Mr. Glaisyer (referring to the Act) : It is optional. The Chairman : The Court is of opinion that any prosecution in such cases is equally for the benefit of the chemists and druggists as for the public ; and as this is a test case we must restrict the amount of the costs to be allowed, and we think £10 a good allowance under those circumstances. This, however, must not be taken as any precedent in this Court for allowing costs in future. gispcushrg Iftemonwtra:. In order to assist as much as possible our younger brethren, for whose salce partly this column ivas established, considerable latitude is allowed, according to promise, in the propounding of supposed difficulties. But the right will be exercised of excluding too trivial questions, or re¬ petitions of those that have been previously discussed in principle. And we would suggest that those who meet with difficulties should before sending them search previous numbers of the Journal to see if they can obtain the re¬ quired information. [435J. Can you inform me the best mode of incorpo¬ rating “ eserine sulphate ” with lard or vaseline into a smooth ointment ? It is too costly to experiment upon. J. J. [436]. Would any experienced dispenser kindly say what excipient he has found to be the best for making up small quantities of pulv. ext. coloc. co. or of the pulv. pil. coloc. co. into a mass for pills? Water, syrup, glycerine, tragacanth, paste, have all been tried, but with these excipients the pills either become so hard as to be insoluble or in a very short time lose their shape. Tyro. [437]. P. T. W. will be glad to know what colour the ointment in the following prescription should be : — K Zinci Oxydi . gr. 40. Acidi Carbolici . gr. 10. TTng. Hyd. Nitratis . Ung. Benzoat . fffv. 01. Lavand . litxx. M. ft. ung. P. T. W., who was informed by the physician who prescribed it that it should be yellow, found upon mixing by heat it became a dark slate colour. He then rubbed the ingredients together on the slabs, producing a light grey coloured ointment, which in the course of half an hour assumed the tint obtained in the first process. He used ung. zinci, B.P. , in place of the zinci oxid. and ung. benz. [438]. Can any reader inform me of a better excipient for pepsine pills than glycerine. Nemo. Comspaittreita. “ Student .” — The provisions of the Act apply only to Great Britain. — For some particulars as to the condition of pharmacy in South Africa, see vol. x., pp. 300 and 340. Associate. — See the Journal for June 19, p. 1031. J. H. Dingle. — (1) Cladonia uncialis. (2) Stereo caulon corallinum. (3) Splicer ophoron corralloides. (4) Cladonia rangiferina. (5) Lecanosa tartarea. (6) Cladonia furcata. R. L. G. — Our disability in respect to the name is as great as your own. J. H. Edward. — The ingredients of the mixture could not be separated as chlorides. See Fresenius’ ‘Quantitative Chemical Analysis/ for method for separating gold from platinum. D. Grant. — We do not think the object can be obtained by any means short of a surgioal operation. Communications, Letters, etc., have been received from Dens, T. Ronchetti, M. L. R., G. Wilkinson, W. K. G., Locum Tenens, P. H. Davies, T. W., Professor Landerer, W. F. Haydon, H. T., H. R. Arnold, Enquirer, Apprentice, R. C. H., Embryo. The length of the report of the Stockport case compels us to defer until next week the publication of a number of other communications. August 14, 1880.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 129 PAPAINE.* ’ BY A WURTZ. In a former paper f the author described, in con¬ junction with Dr. Bouchut, a ferment which they had prepared by precipitating with alcohol the aqueous portion of the milky juice of Carica papaya after the formation of a coagulum, and to which they gave the name 11 psfpalne.” It was at the same time stated that it appeared probable that a fresh quantity of papaine was formed by the action of water upon the coagulum. In the present paper M. Wurtz describes the experiments undertaken with the object of settling this and other points. 125 grams of papaw juice obtained by incision of the green fruit were filtered and the residue pressed. The solution precipitated by alcohol yielded 0*89 gram of a papaine very rich in ash, and containing — deduction being made of the ash — 45 ’62 per cent, of carbon and 6*72 per cent, of hydrogen. The pressed pulp was triturated in a mortar with 125 grams of water, and after twenty-four hours thrown upon a filter. The residue upon the filter was triturated with a fresh quantity of 90 grams of water. The two liquors, concentrated in a vacuum with the addition of a few drops of prussic acid, yielded 2*3 grams of papaine. After these two washings, the pulp, already much reduced, was sub¬ mitted to two fresh washings with water (first with 142 c.c. and then with 150 c.c.), and the liquors, united and concentrated in a vacuum, still yielded IT gram of papaine, being a larger proportion than yielded by the original juice. This papaine, which digested fibrin energetically, contained (deduction being made for ash) carbon, 4977, and hydrogen, 7-21 per cent. It therefore presented a composition differing from that of the ferment dissolved in the original juice. After these four washings, the white pulpy resi¬ due, not very much being left, was again digested with 50 c.c. of water, and the water afterwards placed with 10 grams of moist fibrin. At the end of two days only 8 grams of fibrin remained, and the liquid, after filtration, was precipitated slightly by nitric acid ; the fifth wash water, therefore, still contained a small quantity of ferment. After these five washings there only remained 5 grams of moist pulp, representing 0*564 gram of dry matter. 2*5 grams of this pulp put to digest with 10 grams of moist fibrin at 50° C., left at the end of two days only 6 grams of moist fibrin, and the filtered liquid gave an abundant precipitate with nitric acid. In another experiment 100 grams of juice obtained by incision of the fruit were suspended in water, forming a thick pulp, which was washed three times Avith water. The washings were added to the first liquor and the whole concentrated in a vacuum and precipitated by alcohol. The papaine (No. I.) so obtained, which was very white, was analysed. The pulp that remained upon the filter was suspended in a large quantity of water. After filtration the liquid concentrated in a vacuum yielded a fresh quantity of papaine (No. II.), which contained, as in the previous case, a larger quantity of carbon. X * Comptes Rendus, vol. xc., p. 1379. t See Pharmaceutical Journal, [3], rol. x., p. 283. X Analyses of the pulp exhausted by water, alcohol and ether gave variable results. This residue still contained nitrogen. Third Series, No. 52§. Deduction made I. II. for ash. " I. IL Carbon . . . 42*21 44*18 4690 48*55 Hydrogen . . 6*28 6*28 6*99 6*90 Oxygen . . . 10*00 9*00 — — It is therefore demonstrated that the pulp, after being freed by washing from soluble ferment that may be adherent to it, still yields, by the action of water, a ferment capable of digesting fibrin. It may be recalled here that the gastric ferment appears to be contained under an insoluble form in the pepsini¬ ferous glands, for these do not yield it to pure water. The analyses just quoted show that the soluble ferment of Carica papaya, such as is obtained in pre¬ cipitating by alcohol the aqueous solution containing it, is not of a constant composition. Numerous ana¬ lyses of crude papaine have, in fact, given very diver¬ gent results in respect to the proportions of carbon and nitrogen, the carbon varying between 46 and 53 er cent, and the nitrogen between 14 and 1 8 per cent,, eduction being made for ash. The proportion of ash varied also ; generally it was high, amounting to 4 per cent, and even more ; in one case it amounted to 20 per cent. It was ascertained that the ash consisted chiefly of phosphate of lime; it yielded soluble salt to water, and sulphuric acid and a small quantity of potash have been noticed. It follows from the foregoing that alcohol precipi¬ tates from papaw juice, fresh or digested with water, a principle of variable composition. This would not be surprising, as the ferment might be mixed with other amorphous principles, especially with albumi¬ noid substances, modified by its action, i.e., peptones. These peptones being more dialysable than the fer¬ ment itself, it might be hoped that the ferment would concentrate on the dialyser. Experience has shown, in fact, that the residue from dialysis yields a ferment richer in carbon, and not containing more than 1 to 3 or 4 per cent, of ash. The following are some analyses of the ferment so purified. It may be remarked that the white precipitate obtained by alcohol was exhausted by ether, then dried in a vacuum at 75°. Papaine, purified by dialysis, deduction made for ash* Carbon . . 50*77 51*80 50*70 52*77 Hydrogen • 7*23 6*71 7*50 7*47 Nitrogen . . — * — — 15*17 These analyses show that the product purified by dialysis approaches in its composition that of albu¬ minoid substances, and this analogy is strengthened by the fact that papaine contains rather a large proportion of sulphur, in two specimens there having been found 2*61 and 2*2 per cent, respectively* The preceding analyses presented too much diver¬ gence to allow of the conclusion that the product is definite and homogeneous. Another mode of purifi¬ cation was therefore attempted. Albumen ana pep¬ tones being precipitated by subacetate of lead it was hoped to separate them by this reagent, which pre¬ cipitates crude papaine incompletely. To such a solution, therefore, subacetate of lead was carefully added until a portion after filtration no longer gave a precipitate. The precipitate was separated and a current of sulphuretted hydrogen passed into the * The experiments were made with products that had been submitted to lengthened dialysis and should not have retained any more sulphate, but the figures obtained re¬ quire to be checked. 130 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [August 14, 1880. filtrate. This was blackened, but the lead sulphide was not precipitated in flocks. To separate it the liquid was concentrated in a vacuum, and alcohol added to it drop by drop so as to carry down the lead sulphide with the first portions of the papaine precipitated. The deposit having been separated by filtration the clear liquid yielded to alcohol a white precipitate of papaine. Two experiments made upon crude papaine from different sources yielded speci¬ mens of purified papaine, which after exhaustion with ether and drying at 75° C. in a vacuum, gave, de¬ duction being made for ash — I. 11. . III. •Carbon . . 52-36 52T9 52-9 Hydrogen . 7-37 7T2 — Nitrogen 16-94 16-40 16-44 Ash . . . 2-60 4-22 3-40 The sulphur was not estimated, sulphuretted hy¬ drogen having been used during the operation. A third specimen contained 1 per cent, less of carbon, - when submitted to dialysis during twenty-four hours it gave the figures stated under III. It may be added that O'l gram of specimen III. digested energetically 5 grams of moist fibrine, even after having been heated to 105° C. M. Wurtz considers that the preceding analyses demonstrate that the digestive ferment of Carica papaya, named “ papaine ” by himself and M. Bou- chut, possesses the composition of an albuminoid substance. To the characters previously attributed to this substance he adds the following, which relate to papaine purified by subacetate of lead. It is very soluble in water, in which it is capable of dissolving in less than its own weight, after the manner of a gum. The solution, even when dilute, forms upon agitation an abundant froth. The crude papaine redissolved leaves sometimes an insoluble white residue. Solution of papaine becomes turbid upon boiling, without coagulating like albumen. . When left to itself during several days it also becomes turbid, and if then examined under a microscope is found to be full of vibriones and bacilla. It gives an abundant precipitate with hydrochloric acid, and the precipitate dissolves readily in excess of the acid. Nitric acid, added in small quantity, precipitates thick yellowish flocks that dissolve in excess of the acid. Neither ordinary phosphoric acid nor acetic acid precipitate it, but metaphosphoric acid gives a plentiful precipitate. Prussiate of potash added to acetic acid gives a precipitate. Corrosive sublimate does not precipitate imme¬ diately the solution of pure papaine, or only gives a slight turbidity ; after a time the turbidity becomes more apparent. Upon boiling an abundant flocculent precipitate is formed. Plumbic subacetate does not give a precipitate or only causes a slight turbidity, soluble in an excess of the reagent. If excess of potash be added to the liquor and it be heated it becomes blackened in con¬ sequence of the formation of sulphide of lead. Sulphate of copper gives a violet precipitate, which becomes blue upon boiling and dissolves in potash with a beautiful blue colour. _ Chloride of platinum gives an abundant pre¬ cipitate as also does tannic acid. Picric acid gives an abundant precipitate insoluble in excess of the reagent. Millen’s reagent gives a plentiful yellowish-white precipitate that becomes brick red when slightly heated. These characters, as will be seen, are those of albu¬ minoid matters, with some variations, especially in respect to corrosive sublimate and subacetate of lead. In its action upon albuminoid matters papaine approaches the pancreatic ferment named “trypsine” by M. Kiihne, who has made a careful study of it. Unlike pepsine, trypsine appears to approach the albuminoid matters ; its action upon the latter appears to be more energetic than that of papaine. Papaine dissolves large quantities of fibrin rapidly, even in a neutral liquid ; but to get a liquor that will not give a precipitate with nitric acid it is necessary to use a relatively large quantity of papaine, — for example, 0'3 gram for 10 grams of moist fibrin, — and to prolong the digestion at 50° C. during twenty-four hours. In this case there re¬ mains only an insignificant residue of dyspeptone, very rich in mineral matters, and the filtered solu¬ tion gives with nitric acid only a slight turbidity that may be due to an excess of the ferment. More¬ over, in all these digestions, besides the bodies pre- cipitable by nitric acid and by alcohol, there is formed a certain quantity of more hydrated peptones that are soluble in ordinary alcohol, especially with heat. The rapidity with which solutions of papaine become filled with microbes induced M. Wurtz to ascertain whether they intervene in the rapid lique¬ faction of fibrin by this ferment, but he finds that nothing of the kind occurs. The solution of fibrin by papaine takes place in the presence of prussic acid, boric acid, and even carbolic acid ; that is to say, in conditions that exclude the formation of microbes. In conclusion, M. Wurtz adds that he has separated from the juice of Carica papaya a fatty saponifiable substance and a crystallizable nitrogenous principle in white mamelons. These remain in solution in the liquor from which crude papaine has been pre¬ cipitated. Further information on this subject will be given in a future paper. COCCUS RED * BY R. BOTHER. Take of — Cochineal (whole) .... Alum, in fine powder . . Citric acid ...... Chlorhydric acid .... Ammonia water, 16 to 18 per cent . . Alcohol, strong .... 8 troy ounces. 2 „ 1 „ 1 fluid 1) 2i f) » Disodium carbonate, sodium chloride and water, of each sufficient. Mix the chlorhydric acid and two troy ounces of sodium chloride with forty-four fluid ounces of water and pour the solution upon the cochineal contained in a suitable vessel. After macerating the mixture for two days, with occasional stirring, decant the liquid and set it aside. On the residue pour thirty-two fluid ounces of water, and after a two days’ maceration, as before, again decant the liquid and unite it with the previous decantate. The residue is now again mixed with thirty-two fluid ounces of water containing eight troy ounces of sodium chloride in solution, and after having macerated for two days the * From the Pharmacist and Chemist , June, 1880. ■I . August 14, 1850.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 131 mixture is poured into a strainer and subjected to strong pressure. The colate is now incorporated with the mixture of the first two macerates, and the resulting liquid after a sufficient repose is decanted from the sediment. Dissolve the alum in the clear decantate and add the ammonia water, pour the mixture upon a plain filter and then wash the collected precipitate with water until practically freed from saline solution. Dissolve the citric acid in four fluid ounces of water and add disodium carbonate in large crystals until the effervescence of carbonic oxide ceases. In this solution now dissolve the washed aluminum carminate with a gentle heat, add water to the measure of twenty-eight fluid ounces, then the alcohol, and mix. In a former discussion of this topic the writer pointed out the various defects of the usual method by which cochineal colouring is prepared, and then submitted a new process, in which diverse drawbacks of the older operation did not occur. But the otherwise admirable features of the improved formula were not sufficiently potent to over¬ come the radical faults dependent upon the intrinsic character of the incorporated components. In order to achieve a result more thoroughly representative of the pure colouring principle, in an unincumbered, more definite and permanent form, the writer dissected the formula, as it were, and independently examined the several parts as to their behaviour and appropriateness in this connection. Since the dibasic carminic acid solely possesses the tinctorial property of cochineal, the endeavour was directed towards its expeditious and complete elimination from the attendant inert, cumbrous, and putrescible matters constituting the body of the insect. Chlorhydric acid with sodium chloride in weak aqueous solution, followed by a saturated solution of sodium chloride, by means of remaceration, was found the most satisfactory and efficient agent for rendering a preliminary separation of the carminic acid from the gross of the matrix. The 7i. Mr. Ellinor, the President, in the chair. After a discussion on the forthcoming Pharmaceutical Conference at Swansea, the following were appointed delegates to represent the Society: — Messrs. Ellinor, Ward, F.C.S., Allen, F.I.C., F.C.S., and Maleham. Several other matters of importance were brought before the meeting, after due consideration of which the meeting was brought to a close. mwbwgs jorf Sdmiifit Sbomim. SCHOOL OF PHARMACY STUDENTS’ ASSOCIATION. The annual meeting of this Association was held on Thursday, July 15, when the President, Professor Attfield, F.R.S., occupied the chair. The Secretary read the report of the Executive Com¬ mittee, the salient points of which were that the commu¬ nications read before the Association during the session have exceeded those of last session, both in point of numbers and in the predominance of those of a phar¬ maceutical character. The number of communications read has been twenty-eight, fourteen papers and four¬ teen reports. Six of the papers were pharmaceutical, four chemical, one botanical, one educational, one bio¬ graphical, one physiographical. Two reports have been made on each of the following subjects: — Pharmacy, botany, materia medica, inorganic chemistry, organic chemistry, physical chemistry and analytical chemistry. The adoption of the report of the Executive Committee was moved by Mr. H. Senier, and seconded by Mr. W. E. Bush, and carried unanimously. Messrs. H. Senier and C. H. Hutchinson were ap¬ pointed as a committee to audit the Treasurer’s accounts, which they reported to be correct. There being no further business, the Association ad¬ journed over the vacation. CHEMISTS’ ASSISTANTS’ ASSOCIATION. A special and numerously attended meeting of the above Association was held at its rooms, 32a, George Street, Hanover Square, on Wednesday, July 7. Mr. G. F. Snow, one of the Vice-Presidents, occupied the chair. The evening was devoted to an interesting exhibition of microscopes by Messrs. Branson, Killick, Naylor, Parker and Tharle. Mr. W. H. Wrenn exhibited some specimens of the rarer essential oils, also some very fine crystals of sul¬ phate of cinchonine, amorphous koussine, etc. Mr. T. Hardwick also exhibited some bronze medals, English and Italian photographs, etc., in which those present took great interest. Readings, recitations and songs were given by members at intervals during the evening. A vote of thanks being accorded to the Chairman for presiding, a very successful meeting terminated. SOCIETY OF ARTS. The Chemistry of Bread-Making.* BY PROFESSOR GRAHAM, D.SC. (Continued from page 147.) Lecture V. At last we have got our loaf in the oven, and it will remain in the oven about an hour and a half. While it is in there, I propose, in the first place, to consider some peculiarities in ovens, and then to discuss that part of the subject which comes most within my province, namely, the chemical changes produced by the action of heat on the loaf. In the common oven, in former times, and even yet to some extent abroad, the heat was obtained by burning wood inside the oven ; that is to say, in that part of the oven in which the bread was afterwards placed. When the combustion of the wood had com¬ municated a sufficient amount of heat to the walls of the oven, then the embers were taken out and the bread was put in. This is manifestly a rather cumbersome method, and I need hardly say, in a country like ours, is also an expensive one. Consequently, even long ago, coal was employed for the purpose of heating the oven, the coal being used in external furnaces. The Vienna baker, who certainly for many long years has been pre-eminently the best baker in Europe, and from whom the Parisian has learned much, years ago found out that steam, acting on the moist surface of the loaf, was able, at the high tem¬ perature of the oven, to convert the starchy matter of the surface, moistened, as I said before with water, into dextrin ; in other words, by the action of heat and mois¬ ture, he found that he could convert starch into dextrin in much the same way that the greater part of the dex- * Cantor Lectures : Delivered November and December, 1879. Reprinted from the Journal of the Society of Arts. 162 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [August 21, 1880 trin, which is now used in calico printing, or at the hack of postage stamps, is also made. The Vienna baker obtains the steam in this way. The first batch of bread is common bread, of rather an inferior character, and of course in baking that bread the oven is charged with the moisture of the steam which comes from the bread. After that the rolls, moistened on the surface with water, being placed in the oven, the steam from the first batch of bread causes this glazing of the surface. Of late years the Parisian bakers have employed steam boilers, so that an injection of steam, from a boiler working under a little pressure, takes place into the oven, and such ovens, though they are not common, can be found in several places in London. I have a drawing here of an oven which will give you an idea of the character of the opera¬ tion that goes on. The centre drawing represents the front of the oven as you see it with the door for the ad¬ mission of bread, and a door underneath for warming up rolls and loaves previous to their introduction into the oven. On the side is the boiler with the steam gauge. You will notice the drawing has two lines indicating an intersection, at A B and C D. The drawing on the left is the section at a b, and shows the interior of the oven. The door is partially open, and there is a pipe at the side, with small apertures for the purpose of charging the oven with steam. You will notice that the floor of the oven is not horizontal, but rises slightly, the object being that when the door is opened the steam shall not fall out. Being heated, it is lighter than air, and if there is a slight incline given to the floor of the oven, the tendency of the steam is to keep in ; whereas, if it is flat, there is a tendency for a considerable quantity of the steam to pass out every time the door is opened and shut. The other drawing represents a section on the line c D, which indicates, by means of a movable door, the way in which the flame coming from the furnace is sent into the oven in order to heat its stone walls. So soon as the oven has arrived at a temperature of about 400° to 450°, it is closed. In the bakeries of Mr. Bonthron, of Regent Street, and Mr. Carl Fleck, of the Brompton Road, a plan is adopted of having two ovens, side by side, so as to economize the fuel to some extent. I have not examined other ovens, but I know that besides these there are some other bakers in London who also adopt this injection method, which practically, in its first conception, was due to the Austrian baker. In addition to this system of baking bread by means of fuel, steam has also been employed in other processes ; what is called Neville’s bread, which has a considerable sale in London, I understand, is baked by means of steam at a high temperature. You, doubtless, know the cha¬ racter of that bread sufficiently well, and it is, therefore, not necessary that I should further allude to it. I will pass on now to the chemical examination of the changes which take place when the bread is introduced into the oven. In the first place, the bottom of the loaf, and the side and the top of the loaf, are greatly heated by the hot surface which comes in contact with the bot¬ tom, and by the hot surfaces, which radiate the heat from the top of the oven on to the loaf. You will notice, in looking at the drawing, that the depth of the oven is comparatively slight, the object being to have the radiat- ing surface as near as possible to the top of the loaf. So ' soon as the loaf has been submitted to the action of the heat, the carbonic acid gas which was in the dough ex¬ pands, and by the time that gas has been heated from about 80° to 212°, which is the boiling point of water, that gas will have expanded from 1 cubic inch to T24, and that will indicate the amount of increase that a loaf would undergo, supposing there was no moisture. But while that amount of increase takes place, due to the ex¬ pansion of the carbonic acid gas itself, there is also con¬ siderable expansion due to the fact that the gas is moist. Now, the tension of aqueous vapour at 212°, is equal to the atmospheric pressure, and therefore we get an enor¬ mous increase, due to the amount of the moisture, as well as to the carbonic acid gas itself. I said just now that the temperature of the oven ranged from about 400° to 450°. The temperature of boiling water is 212°, that is to say, provided the barometer stands at 30 inches of mercury, because, of course, there is a higher boiling point if the barometer be higher, and lower if the baro¬ meter should stand lower. Therefore, although the walls of the ovens are at a temperature of about 400° to 450°, the loaf itself is not at such a temperature. The bottom, which is resting on the hot surface, of course is consider¬ ably heated, but the interior of the loaf does not rise much above 212°. It rises doubtless slightly above that temperature, due to the resisting action of the outer sur¬ face of the crust, which adds to the resistance of the atmospheric pressure. Secondly, during this action which is going on in the presence of moisture, the cell walls of the starch are ruptured, so that we obtain from such a heating action, not starch such as we know it before it is boiled, but starch which, by the ruptured cells, lends itself readily to the action of albuminoid ferments. Thirdly, by the action of heat, some of the albuminous matter undergoes a degrading action, which is afterwards of use in the digestion process. But that is not all. Due to the action of heat and moisture, not only is there glaz¬ ing by the production of dextrin on the surface, but there is also, to a slight extent, a production of dextrin in the interior of the loaf. You all know that if you were to boil a suet dumpling, for example, for a comparatively short time, the suet dumpling would not be very re¬ markable for its digestibility. Indeed, as in a day or two, the most favoured festival of our year will be at hand, I am reminded, by this action of the heat upon the dumpling, of the old doggrel, which I should imagine was partly composed by youth and partly by the ex¬ perience of old age. That doggrel says, “ Plum pudding hot, plum pudding cold.” That represents, to a great extent, the desire of youth to have plum pudding, no¬ matter whether it be hot or cold, provided there be plenty of it. But then, old age lays down this as a necessary condition, that the plum pudding should be “ in the pot nine days old;” in other words, you cannot get digestible albuminoids and starch of wheat unless they have been submitted to the prolonged action of heat and moisture, and this, to some extent, takes place in the action of heat upon the loaf in the oven. Another point I have to notice is, that coloured pro¬ ducts are formed. I have a table on the wall,* prepared by Oudemans, showing the action of heat on malt, and you will see there that air-dried malt contains no torre- faction products, and that there are no less than 13’6 per cent, of albuminoid matters ; whereas, when the malt is heated to a temperature less than the boiling point, we get 14 per cent, of torref action products, and only 10*5 of albuminous matter. The torrefaction or coloured pro¬ ducts that are formed, are partly due to the action of moisture at a high temperature on soluble albuminoid matters, and partly to the dextrin and maltose sugars that have been formed in the previous panification process.. Now, the more soluble products are obtained in the previous process of bread-making, the greater will be amount of colour in the final loaf. On the other hand* the less the soluble products produced by the previous bread-making process, the less will be the coloured pro¬ ducts obtained in the oven. That is why inferior flours produce so much colour. Inferior flours, as I pointed out to you from the tables drawn up by Mr. Brown, yield to> the panification process, that is, in the process where moist and moderate heat is acting on flour for a con¬ siderable time, a very large quantity of soluble products. Therefore, I say that the more soluble products obtained in the previous panification process, the greater the amount of coloured products obtained in the oven, and of course the less pleasant does the loaf look. Another matter we ought to notice is, that by the action of heat we obtain the outside crust. This crust * See before, p. 147. August 21, 18S0.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 163 retains the moisture for a much longer time than if there were no crust, and lastly, the amount of moisture or water is greater the finer the flour, and, of course, vice versa , and this absorption and retention of water depends upon two distinct factors. In the first place, it depends upon the higher character of the albuminoids. Albu¬ minoids of high maturation character (such as the crude gluten, which, you will remember, I told you was com¬ posed chiefly of fibrin, and to some extent, also of glutin) absorb and retain water with great avidity, which is not the case with some other forms of albuminoids, such as albumin found in most cereals, found largely in our in¬ ferior wheats in bad seasons, but to a very small extent in really well-matured wheats grown in highly flavoured climates ; the legumin and other soluble albuminoid bodies, found very largely in the leguminosce; and the cerealin, which is one of the albuminoids found in the husks of cereals — of wheat especially : these soluble albu¬ minoids do not absorb much water, nor have they much power in retaining it. Therefore, I say, that the first factor depends on the character of the albuminoids present. But there is still another, which is this, it depends also on the percentage of starch. Supposing you have a sufficiently large quantity of the hard gluten, then the higher the amount of starch, the more water will be absorbed and retained by such flour. This absorption and retention of water enters largely into the question of the number of loaves that may be obtained from 100 lbs. of flour. The baker, of course, reckons by the sack, but it is more convenient to take a percentage result. According to Laws and Gilbert, in 100 lbs. of bread, there will be on the average 6 2 '8 of dry solid matter, and 37*2 of water; according to Millon, 637 of dry matter and 36-3 of water; according to Dumas, 55*4 of dry matter and 44*6 of water; according to Maclagan, who made a series of researches on this matter, the average amount of dry matter was 64, and of water 36. Erom a number of results supplied to me by many bakers, I find the average agrees pretty well with the statement of Lawes and Gilbert. To take this ques¬ tion from another point of view, 100 lbs. of flour will yield, according to LaAves and Gilbert, 135 lbs. of bread ; according to Dumas, 130; and Maclagan, 137*7. But I need hardly say that the number of loaves obtained from 100 lbs. of wheat flour, or the number of loaves obtained from the sack, will, of course, vary according to the cha¬ racter of the wheat. Practically, the finer the wheat, the greater number of loaves obtained from it. It may be of interest — not to those practically acquainted Avith the matter, but to those who are not — to say that the number of loaves obtained from a sack of flour Avill vary. I am afraid, in a year like this with English wheats, the results would be rather low ; but, taking more favoured circum¬ stances, it will vary from 90 to 94 ; possibly, with ex¬ ceedingly fine foreign wheats, more than the latter number may be obtained. I have now done with the fermentation process, by which carbonic acid gas (I have said very little about the alcohol which is produced, as I pointed out, along with carbonic acid gas in the fermentation process) is used for the purpose of lightening the bread. I have. now to refer briefly to what may be called artificial processes of pro¬ ducing the same evolution of carbonic acid gas, not from the flour, but from chemical substances used along with the flour. The best known of these methods is the process of Dauglish, which is still practised in London, and it may be in some other large towns of England. The carbonic acid gas in this method is obtained by the action of acid upon chalk, that is, carbonate of lime. The carbonic acid obtained by the decomposition of chalk is thoroughly well washed, and the carbonic acid* and water are then mixed, in proper proportions, with the flour, and, as rapidly as possible, the dough is made, scaled, made up into loaves, and put into the oven. Now, the advan¬ tages of these artificial processes are manifest. An inferior flour is not submitted to the degrading action of the albuminoids upon the starch ; we obtain no sugars, we obtain no dextrin. In other words, no action takes place, except in the OAren, and, therefore, one is able to employ inferior flours by such an artificial process. I referred to this process at our last meeting, and a gentleman asked me at the end of the lecture whether I meant that those who employed the Dauglish process used inferior flours. Of course, I did not say that, nor do I say it. I merely say that one of the advantages of the invention or suggestion of Dr. Dauglish is, that we can make use of inferior flours. Another advantage is, that the process is a very rapid one. The whole making of bread occupies a very small period of time compared with the long, tedious, laborious operations of the ordinary fermentation plan. On the other hand, I think I am bound to mention (though this is not so much a scientific matter as one of personal opinion) what I consider the disadvantage of the process. Such a bread is manifestly lfejs SAveet than if the flour had been subjected to the fermentation process. There has been no dextrin, no sugar formed, and the albuminoids have not been lowered or degraded. Consequently, such a bread does not taste sweet ; it has none of that nutty flavour, according to my taste, which a well-fermented good loaf has ; and it seems to me that many other people at least must have adopted the same opinion, because it is long since Dr. Dauglish proposed this method, which theoretically seems a very excellent one, and yet, I think I am not very wrong in saying that, if we consider Europe, we shall find that a remarkably small portion of the flour of Europe is sub¬ mitted to the Dauglish method, compared to the vast amount of bread made by the fermentation process ; and if the bread had been so well thought of by the world at large, it ought by this time to have progressed much more than it has. Another objection Avhich occurs to me here is this, that the bread cannot be so rapidly digested as the fermented bread; and it would be desirable that investigation should be made upon this point, because one cannot help feeling interested in the Dauglish process, on account of certain obvious merits which it has. Other methods for producing artificial raising of bread are very numerous, and I need only name two or three of them. In the first place, there is the process by which bicarbonate of soda and hydrochloric or muriatic acid are brought to act on each other in the dough. A reaction takes place, by which chloride of sodium, or common salt, is formed, and the carbonic acid escapes, and, therefore, raises the loaf. But it is necessary that the operation should be carried on very rapidly, and it is also necessary that the exact proportions of bicarbonate of soda and hydrochloric acid should be used, so that there should be an exact naturalization of one by the other. In addition to this method, tartaric acid and bicarbonate of soda are employed occasionally ; and sometimes hydrochloric acid, to which a small quantity of the acid phosphate of lime has been added, is also employed, along with the bicar¬ bonate of soda. It is very easy to make this acid phos¬ phate of lime. If you take a small portion of burnt bones, called bone ash, which comes so largely from the River Plate and the Rio Grande in South America, and add to it hydrochloric acid, you convert it into what is technically termed superphospate of lime, or acid phosphate of lime, and if you use an excess of hydrochloric acid, you will have a solution of acid phosphate of lime in the hydrochloric acid liquid, and this, if it be used to react on the bicarbonate of soda, will give common salt, together with phosphate of lime . The use of such agents has been recommended by many, owing to the desire, especially in the case of poor children, ill supplied with milk, that the bread should contain bone earth, or the elements of bone earth, so that the children may obtain a considerable quantity of phosphate for the purpose of building up their bone tissue which, at an early age, is so necessary. Bicarbonate of ammonia has also been employed as an artificial method of raising bread, and, of course, there are many other such artificial chemical 164 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [August 21, 1SS0 means. The various baking powders which are so much advertised, depend on a reaction of tins kind by which carbonic acid gas is employed artificially. They all of them seem to me to be open to the same objection as the Dauglish method, and they have not its advantages, except in so far as they enable one to make an aerated bread under certain unfavourable circumstances, such as at sea, or far away from the means of obtaining yeast ; of course, under these conditions, they have some value. Our bread being made, the next point one has to con¬ sider is, how it is digested. Now, digestion is a continua¬ tion of fermentation. Of course, I am using the expression fermentation in the same sense that I used it in speaking of the hydration action upon starch. I am not using the term now in the sense of the boiling fermentation, where carbonic acid and alcohol are produced, but that form in which water is added to the molecular structure of the starch, and by which sugars and dextrin are formed. The first agent which is brought to bear upon the bread is the albuminoid ferment, called by physiologists, pty aline, which is found in the saliva. In order to obtain a thorough and rapid hydration of the starch, so that that starch is converted into soluble bodies, sugars and dextrin, it is necessary that the bread should be thoroughly com¬ minuted, and we are endowed with a very wonderful apparatus for the purpose of cutting and grinding it up into a fine porous mass. At the same time, while this opera¬ tion is going on, the grinding action stimulates the glands, so that during the time they pour out the secretion destined by Nature for the solution of these starchy bodies. Of course two points have here to be considered. I said we must obtain a fine, light, porous mass, and we must, therefore, so cut up or grind that bread that it should always remain a fine porous mass ; that it should be thoroughly aerated, and at the same time well mixed with this albuminoid ferment of the saliva. Manifestly, therefore, we see at once that the habit, which is so common in England, of eating hot rolls and new bread, is the very opposite of what Nature has pointed out should be done. Bread which, when you press it between your finger and thumb forms into impervious balls, is not a bread which lends itself readily to the action I am speaking of ; and I have been told, on good authority, that bakers, who have found out for themselves so many very interesting scientific facts connected with the whole process of panification, seldom eat new bread. Indeed, one gentleman said they never did ; they wait, at any rate until the second day, until it will, in the grinding action, remain light and porous for the action of the ptyaline upon it. Mr. Lewis has kindly heated two tubes. In my right hand, I hold a tube which contains a solution of bread, made simply by breaking it up to a fine powder, and then digesting it for two hours at a temperature of 100° Fahr. It was then filtered ; nothing but water was added to the bread, and he has added some of Fehling’s liquid and has boiled it. You see that there has been no reduction, or, at any rate, a very small reduction of the protoxide of copper to the suboxide. Whereas, in the other tube, the bread was comminuted into the fine condition in which it should be, as was also done in the other case, and it was then mixed with a little saliva obtained by exciting the submaxillary gland. This was warmed also, at about 90° to 100° Fahr., for about two hours, and you see the amount of sugar that has been formed. Where the saliva has been mixed with the bread, it has produced a considerable quantity of sugar. So far for the sugar. On the addition of a little alcohol, we shall be able also to see a considerable difference in the total amount of products which have been rendered soluble under the two condi¬ tions. The right-hand tube was the one submitted to the action of the saliva, and the left-hand one exhibits simply the action of water on the bread. There is in one case a considerable precipitate, and in the other very much less. I will also show you the amount of albuminoids which have been rendered soluble in the same time. While Mr. Lewis is doing that, I will make a few remarks on the necessity for all of us to husband this valuable fluid. It is not given to us to throw away, and those of you who are just about to begin manhood’s life, I should certainly recommend, if possible, not to adopt the habit of smoking. But still, if you should smoke — and I do not suppose anything I may say will prevent you — I should recom¬ mend you to learn the way in which a G-erman smokes. Any average Gorman will smoke from morning to night, from the beginning of the year to the end, and will not expectorate once ; he learns the habit of smoking without expectorating, and the result is he is none the worse for his smoking — at least, one does not see it; whereas we, in. England, with our short pipes, smoke tobacco loaded with moisture — which is one of those delusions about pipe tobacco which has arisen, probably, from the interest of tobacconists. You know most people have the tobacco loaded with moisture, and keep it in a jar with a leaden cover to it. Thus considerable quantities of unburnt- nicotine distil over with the moisture, and also, at the same time, tarry products and creasote ; whereas when the tobacco is dry, a comparatively small quantity of these distil over into the mouth and therefore there is no necessity to expectorate. In these tubes you have, on the left-hand side, the solution which has been acted upon by some ferrocyanide of potassium and acetic acid, and that has thrown down most of the albuminoid matters. The one on the left-hand side is the solution of bread simply with water, the other on the right hand, of course, has had saliva added to it. In the left tube you see there is no precipitate, or an excessively small quantity of albuminoid matters ; whereas, in the right-hand tube — due to the saliva — we have an abundant precipitate of albuminous matter. We see, therefore, that this valuable fermenting principle which we have at the very threshold of digestion, is able to convert boiled starch into sugar and dextrin with considerable rapidity, and at the same time also it breaks down, and therefore dissolves some of the albuminoids. It then passes downwards, and in the stomach and duodenum it meets with other fluids, some of which have the power also of hydrating and converting starch into sugar and dextrin, and some others have the power of dissolving the albuminoids themselves. In that way we obtain the perfect solution of the bread that we eat. (To be continued.) |hn-(uttmnf;xi\ir anCt gutter llrombiinjs. Suicide by Poisoning. On June 24, Albert Portway, son of Mr. J. Portway, chemist, Bury St. Edmunds, committed suicide by taking poison. The deceased, who was 21 years of age, had suffered much from headache, violent sickness, and mental depression. It was stated that he had been preparing for the Minor pharmaceutical examination, and entertained fears that he should fail and that this upset his mind. The Coroner’s jury found that he destroyed himself whilst in a state of temporary insanity. — Cambridge Chronicle. A Substitute for Paregoric, important decision. At the Town Hall, Sheffield, on Friday, July 30, before T. W. Rodgers, Esq., and David Ward, Esq., Stephen Middleton, grocer, No. 51, Harvest Lane, was summoned under the 6th section of the Sale of Food and Drugs Act, for selling 4 oz. of paregoric, which was not of .the nature and substance demanded by the purchaser, being destitute of opium. The Town Clerk (Mr. Yeo¬ mans) prosecuted, and Mr. Parker Rhodes, of Rotherham, defended. On June 25, Inspectors Brammer and Ruminings, of August 21, 1880.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 165 ) j , li ■ :! the Health Department, went to the defendant’s shop, and asked for 4 oz. of paregoric. They were not aware that the defendant sold paregoric ; but, being in the neighbourhood, went in for the purpose. The defendant took down a bottle from a shelf behind him, and remarked that he was not obliged to sell any of it to them. He was told that if he refused to sell, he was liable to a penalty of £10 under the Act, and the defendant there¬ upon sold 4 oz. of what purported to be paregoric. He previously told the officers to look at the labels upon the bottle, which said, “ Paregoric substitute, without opium. This article is guaranteed to contain no opium, or any other ingredient prescribed by the new Pharmacy Act, 1868.” ' The defendant, in giving the officers 4 oz. of the contents of the bottle, remarked, “I give it you for what it is worth.” The officers then paid Is. and divided what they received into three portions, one of which was left with the defendant, one was reserved for themselves, and the remaining portion was at once forwarded to Mr. A. H. Allen, the borough analyst, to be analysed. Mr. Allen said he found as the result of his analysis that the sample was destitute of opium, which was the most important ingredient in the medicine known as paregoric or paregoric elixir. The material being destitute of opium, he was of opinion that it was not paregoric. Cross-examined by Mr. Parker Rhodes, Mr. Allen said in what was popularly known as paregoric, opium was a constituent part. The word “paregoric” signified soothing. Opium was not the only sedative known to medical science. Dr. Hime, Medical Officer of Health, said opium was an essential part in the composition of paregoric. In its popular sense, paregoric was a medicine containing opium, and included other ingredients. Cross-examined by Mr. Parker Rhodes : In Dr. Pereira’s ‘Materia Medica,’ it was stated that there could be paregoric without the presence of opium, but that was not the common belief. Mr. Parker Rhodes, for the defendant, said he was instructed to appear, not by the defendant, but by the firm who manufactured the compound. The reason it contained no opium was this : — The law prohibited grocers selling any poisonous ingredient such as opium, and in order that the paregoric might be sold to them, another and weaker article was substituted by the manufacturers, which did equally as well. The defendant was well aware of the purpose for which the officers entered his shop, and until he was threatened with a penalty of £10 he did not wish to sell them that for which they asked. He then told them frankly that he sold it for what it was worth, and showed them the label on the bottle, which said “Paregoric substitute.” The officers were determined to get it, whatever it was, and they obtained that for which they asked. Several persons who were in the shop at the time strongly bore out Mr. Parker Rhodes’s statement, and the maker of the compound, Mr. William Parkinson, wholesale chemist and druggist, of Burnley, spoke as to the nature of the drug. The Bench retired to consider their decision, and upon their return into court, Mr. Rodgers said that in their opinion the defendant had done everything to show the officers that the drug they insisted upon having was not paregoric but only a substitute for paregoric, which did not contain opium. The real question in this case was whether he sold it to them as, and for, paregoric, intend¬ ing to deceive, or whether he sold it for what it was. Inspectors Brammer and Rummings had not given their evidence to the satisfaction of the bench, and on behalf of the defendant there had been an overwhelming amount of testimony that could not be cast aside, that the defendant did not pass the drug off as paregoric, but only for what it claimed to be. Alderman Ward said he cordially agreed with Mr. Rodgers’s remarks, and he thought the defendant had conducted his business in a very proper way. The case was then dismissed, and the Town Clerk asked permission to withdraw two similar cases which he had intended to have brought forward. The Bench consented to this course being pursued. Mr. Parker Rhodes asked for costs for his witnesses. The magistrates declined to grant them, as they believed it would have saved much trouble, and in every way been more straightforward, if the defendant had at once told the officers when they asked for paregoric, “I don’t keep the article.” He had not done so, and, therefore, they could not allow costs. — Sheffield Independent. Alleged Poisoning by a Steedman’s Powder. On Tuesday, August 3, Mr. T. C. Brian, coroner for Plymouth, held an inquest at the Nottingham Arms, Mutley, touching the death of Ernest Jarvis, aged ten months. Ellen Jarvis, mother of the deceased, said the child had not been very strong since its birth, and as it was not quite so well on Saturday last, a portion of a Steedman’s soothing powder was given it. On the Sunday it was still unwell, and about one a.m. on the Monday morning she was aroused by the child breathing very heavily. Mr. Wolf ers tan, surgeon, was immediately sent for, and he came and remained with the child until 5.30 a.m., when it died. She bought the powder from Mr. Saunders, chemist, and she had given these powders very often to her other child, and they had done him good. Mr. Wolferstan, M.R.C.S., said he had attended the child since its birth ; it was a very small child, and if his orders had not been strictly attended to by the mother it would not have lived as long as it did. On Monday morning when he visited the house he found the child unconscious, and from its appearance and other signs he saw that it was suffering from an overdose of opium. He applied the usual remedies, and after about three hours the deceased revived a little, but shortly after it relapsed into its former condition, and died about 5.30 a.m. The mother said she had given the deceased a portion of a Steedman’s soothing powder. He could not, however, account for the death of the child ; but he supposed the powder contained a narcotic, and that the child was unusually susceptible of its influence. The jury returned a verdict that the deceased died from the effects of a narcotic, administered through inadvert¬ ence by the mother, but exonerated the mother from all blame. — Western Morning News. Robbery of Chemicals. At the Central Criminal Court, on Friday, August 13, before the Common Serjeant, Thomas King, Henry Har- bord (a convict), William Harbord, Charles Fryer, Robert Henry Mott and Thomas Bennett, were indicted for con¬ spiring to defraud Messrs. May and Baker, chemical manufacturers, of Battersea, and Messrs. Morson and Sons, wholesale chemists, Holborn. Mr. Poland and Mr. Montagu Williams were for the prosecution ; Mr. Avory and Mr. Forrest Fulton appeared for the defence of two of the prisoners. The case for the prosecution was as follows : — King was a night watchman in the employ of Messrs. May and Baker. From time to time he carried away large quantities of red and white precipitate and calomel, which were handed over to Henry Harbord and a man named Stevens, who have already been convicted and sentenced to five years’ penal servitude, the latter being now called as a witness for the prosecution. William Harbord allowed his house at Battersea to be used as a depdt for the stolen goods, which were sold by his brother to a man named James Clarke and to Mr. Freeman, manufacturing chemist, of Kennington Park Road. The other prisoners, who were in the employ of Messrs. Morson and Sons, frequently conveyed large quantities of chemicals belonging to their masters to Stevens, who handed them to Henry Harbord to sell. In a com* 166 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [August 21, 1880. paratively short period, no less than 300 ounces of morphia were stolen, the prisoners realizing out of this transaction between £4 and £5 per week. The convict Stevens deposed in evidence that Fryer, Mott and Bennett frequently forwarded 'chemicals stolen from Messrs. Morsons by parcels delivery to Stevens’s house. Several witnesses were examined for the purpose of corroborating the evidence of Stevens. At the close of the case the charge against Bennett was withdrawn, and he was discharged. The jury found all the other prisoners guilty. Sentence was respited till next session, there being other indictments against the prisoners to be disposed of. — Daily Telegraph. ©fritumn. Notice has been received of the death of the fol¬ lowing : — On the 20th of June, 1880, Mr. James Semple, Chemist and Druggist, Port Glasgow. Aged 74 years. On the 27th of June, 1880, Mr. Joseph Silvester, Pharmaceutical Chemist, Heathside, Knutsford. Aged 76 years. Mr. Silvester became a Member of the Pharmaceutical Society in 1842. On the 17th of July, 1880, Mr. Robert John Clark, Chemist and Druggist, Old Town Street, Plymouth. Aged 37 years. Mr. Clark became a Member of the Pharmaceutical Society in 1869. On the 23rd of July, 1880, Mr. Edward Pearson Shaw, Chemist and Druggist, Market Place, Wakefield. Aged 52 years. Mr. Shaw became a Member of the Pharma¬ ceutical Society in 1869. On the 25th of July, 1880, Mr. Robert John Clarke, Chemist and Druggist, Snettisham, Norfolk. Aged 60 years. On the 31st of July, 1880, at The Elms, Leominster, Mr. Thomas Cooper Lewis, Pharmaceutical Chemist, Sheep Street, Rugby. Aged 50 years. Mr. Cooper be¬ came a Member of the Pharmaceutical Society in 1856. BOOKS, PAMPHLETS, ETC., RECEIVED. Alphabetical Manual of Blowpipe Analysis : show¬ ing all Methods Old and New. By Lieut.-Colonel W. A. Ross, late R.A. London: Trtibner. 1880. From the Publishers. Professional Book-Keeping. A Treatise for Non- Traders. By William John Gordon. London: Wyman and Sons. 1880. From the Publishers. Tables for the Analysis of a Simple Salt: for Use in School Laboratories. By A. Vintner, M.A. London: Longmans. 1880. From the Publishers. Grundlagen zur Beurtheilung des Trinkwassers. By Dr. E. Reichardt. Fourth edition. Halle a S. : Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses. 1880. From the Publishers. The Workshop Companion, a Collection of Useful and Reliable Recipes, Rules, Processes, Methods, Wrinkles and Practical Hints for the Household and the Shop. New York: Industrial Publication Company. 1879. From the Publishers. Dotes nnir (Queries. [666]. ESSENCE OF COCHINEAL.— Perhaps the following recipe for preparing a really good liquid cochi¬ neal that will keep an indefinite period without change may be useful to Mr. Cottrill, in reply to his request for information on the subject, as I have not yet found any formula to equal it : — R Cochineal . 2 ozs. Subcarbonate of Potash, Alum, Cream of Tartar, of each ... 2 ozs. Distilled Water . 20 ozs. Boil the cochineal and salts of tartar together for about ten minutes, then stir in gradually the cream of tartar and alum, strain through muslin and afterwards filter through paper. To the filtrate add ^ a pound of lump sugar and dissolve with a gentle heat. Sugar is the great preservative agent in this case, and I do not remember ever meeting with a liquor so prepared that- showed any sign of change. 35, Baker Street, W. A. W. Postans. [670]. WRITING INK.— Perhaps the following for¬ mula, taken from the ‘Year-Book of Pharmacy’ for 1874, may suit “Nemo’s” purpose: — R Acid. Pyrogallic . 1 part. Pulv. Gum. Arabic. ..... 3 parts. Ammonke Vanadiate . . . . 3 ,, These to be mixed in a mortar and sufficient water to be added. This forms an intensely black ink. J. S. S. [670] . WRITING INK. — “ Nemo ” will find the following in Gray’s ‘Supplement to the Pharmacopoeia’: — R Bruised Nutgalls . 12 parts. Copperas (slightly calcined) . . 4 ,, Gum Arabic . 4 „ Water . 120 „ Mix them together in a stone bottle and let them stand for two or three weeks, shaking the bottle from time to time. Then pour off the clear liquor and a little creasote to prevent mouldiness. “ 374.” [671] . PERFUMED CARBOLIC ACID.— Will any reader inform me of a method by which earbolic acid can be perfumed so as to render it more pleasant for disin¬ fecting purposes, and yet not destroy its properties ? I have tried essential oils but find that on mixing with water it becomes turbid, a circumstance I wish to avoid. Hypocrateriform. < [672]. STORM GLASS.— Would some reader kindly give me a receipt for a storm glass ? That in ‘ Beasley’s' Receipt Book ’ I cannot get to answer ; it seems to have either too much camphor or water. A. E. Lomax. CAMPHORIC ACID can be produced by boiling camphor with 15 or 16 parts of strong nitric acid, in a suitable glass vessel, for twenty or twenty-four hours, when, upon cooling, the camphoric acid will be found floating on the top of the acid as a crystalline cake. This is removed and carefully washed with ice-cold water, when it will be found to consist of a mass of acicular snow-white crystals. dispensing IJtemaranim, In order to assist as much as possible our younger brethren, for whose sake partly this column was established , considerable latitude is allowed, according to promise, in the propounding of supposed difficulties. But the right will be exercised of excluding too trivial questions , or re¬ petitions of those that have been previously discussed in principle. And we would suggest that those who meet with difficulties should before sending them search previous numbers of the Journal to see if they can obtain the re¬ quired information. Replies. [435]. In answer to J. J., I would suggest the boiling of the required quantity of eserine in a few gttae of water in a test tube to produce a perfectly smooth ung. W. J. B» August 21, I860.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 167 [435]. Eserine sulphate may be readily incorporated with a fatty basis for ointments by previous solution on the slab in a few drops of water, the alkaloid being very soluble in that menstruum, R. H. Parker. [436]. Has “ Tyro ” tried treacle and oil of cloves in the proportion of 10 parts of treacle and 1 part of oil of cloves ? or conf. rosse ? “ 374.” [436]. Water is the best excipient for pulv. ext. coloc. co. and pulv. pil. coloc. co. If the pills have to be kept long, equal parts of water and glycerine may be used and the pills enclosed in a bottle. The glycerine prevents the pills from becoming insoluble, while if made fairly hard they do not lose their shape, because the glycerine cannot exercise its hygroscopic power to any great extent when bottled. R. H. Parker. [436]. “ Tyro ” will find a very small quantity of dec. aloe3. co. cone, the best excipient for pil. and ext. coloc. co. I have made numbers of pills with it and have never found them lose shape. Pill-driver. [441]. M. L. R. would be glad to know what is the best excipient for the following : — 01. Menth. Pip . gt. xviij. Thymol . gt. vj. Ft. pil. xij. They have been made up with soap and magnesia. [442]. A prescription is offered for dispensing : — Ung. Hyd. Iodi. Which should be sent, the protoiodide or the biniodide ? A Junior. Comsjjottbwa. *»* No notice can be taken of anonymous communica¬ tions. Whatever is intended for insertion must be authenti¬ cated by the name and address of the writer; not necessarily for publication, but as a guarantee of good faith. [437]. I should think that the ointment must be of a greyish colour, on account of the mercury contained therein. “374.” [437] . Probably the prescriber was not aware of the fact that ung. hydrarg. nit. soon loses its yellow colour when mixed with lard. Physicians often erroneously forecast the colour of a mixture from that of its con¬ stituents. R. H. Parker. 1 [438] . I believe there is no better excipient for pepsine | pills than glycerine. “ 374.” [438]. In reply to “ Nemo,” equal parts of glycerine .and mucilage ferm a very good mass with pepsine. Gly¬ cerine alone makes the pill too soft, and on keeping they swell and perspire. Pill-driver. [438]. I do not think that a better excipient for pep¬ sine than glycerine is a desideratum. The only objection is the hygroscopic nature of glycerine, which may be easily counteracted by enclosing the pills in a bottle. R. H. Parker. [438]. In reply this query, our formula for pepsine pills is — Pepsine ......... gr. iij. Pulv. Acaciae . gr. ss. Syr. Simplex . q. s. And the result is a very firm and easily manipulated mass. A. J. Heald. Queries. [439]. Zinci Oxyd . 0-5 Ung. Emoll . 40 ‘0 Should the above make a soft [ointment ? — as it was returned as too hard for use when sent out. The ung. emolliens was prepared according to Chevallier’s formula. It had previously been dispensed on the contiment. Nemo. [440]. R Ferri et Ammon. Cit . ^ iij. iEther. Chlor . 3j* Ess. Menth. Pip . trix. 01. Morrhuae . . ad "pv. j§ss. bis vel ter die sumend. Is it possible to make a presentable mixture without •any addition ? If not what would be justifiable ? N. J. A Protest against Reducing Prices. Sir, — As the recent decisions in favour of co-operative trading may incline some of your readers to make greater efforts to compete with the stores, and as there is a great tendency to lower prices at the present time, I wish to point out the inadvisability (as far as my experience goes) of at¬ tempting to compete with stores and other large establish¬ ments by reducing prices, unless we can supply goods at the same rate as they do, which of course we cannot. After carefully watching the matter for more than fifteen months, and trying the experiment in certain cases, I have come to the conclusion, and shall be glad to hear that others have done the same, that it is no use meeting the store price half way, for the public will still go to the cheapest — or what they think the cheapest — market and simply make a con¬ venience of the local higher priced trader, who, therefore, might as well get full price for what he does sell. I can mention the instances of three articles where such has been the case, viz., zoedone, apollinaris, and Allen’s hair restorer, to say nothing of smaller priced articles. On zoedone, which I thought at 6s. 6d. per dozen was cheap enough to please everybody, the public can now save Is. a dozen by buying at the stores, and do so. With regard to apollinaris I have found an unreasonable preference shown for paying 23s. for fifty bottles at the stores, and paying me 8s. per dozen for odd half dozens, when they run out of it (which is pretty often), rather than for buying of me for 25s., and having a constant supply. Mrs. Allen’s hair restorer, again, I used as a test article and have sold at all prices from 4s. 6. : Nagarmotha (Hind., Bomb:, Beng.) ; Koriak-kizhan-gu (Tam.). History , Uses, etc. — These two plants, which • are considered by botanists to be only varieties of the same species, produce aromatic tubers which have long been in use in Hindu medicine under their Sanskrit names of ‘mus taka’ and ‘nagarmustaka.’ They are considered to be diaphoretic, astringent and stomachic, and are prescribed in febrile affections and derangements of the bowels. The nagarmotha is much used as a perfume. The Arabian and Persian writers describe several species of Cyperus under the names of ‘ suud ’ and 1 mishk-i-zamin.’ They consider the tubers to be attenuant, diuretic, em- menagogue, lithontriptic and diaphoretic, and pre¬ scribe them in combination with other remedies in febrile and dyspeptic affections. Alone it is recom¬ mended in a number of minor ailments; one ounce is said to be an efficient anthelmintic. Description. — The ovoid or nearly round tubers of C. rotundus are developed upon a thin underground stem ; externally they are black, scaly, and give off numerous fine rootlets; at their summits the remains of leaves and often one or more small tubers may be seen. The substance of the tuber is white and spongy ; it has a faint aromatic odour much like that of Acorus calamus. Nagarmotha, which is the kind in general use, consists of elongated simple or branched tubers, generally about 2 inches long and ^ inch in diameter. The external surface is marked t>y a number of annular ridges and is almost con¬ cealed by the remains of leaves. When these are re¬ moved the colour of the tuber is a deep brown-black. A few wiry rootlets arise from its under surface, and at the lower end is a portion of the underground stem. The substance of the tuber is hard and of a reddish- white colour ; it is divided into a central and cortical portion, the latter being of a darker colour. The odour is strongly aromatic, like Acorus, but somewhat terebinthinate. Microscopical Structure. — The outermost layer of the cortical portion is composed of large bundles of reddish-brown stony cells separated from one another by interspaces ; within it are from 6 — 8 rows of very thick-walled, empty cells ; next a tissue of thick- walled cells, most of them full of large starch granules, but some containing essential oil and probably resinous matter. The central portion of the root is separated from the cortical by a single row of small yellow stone cells ; it is composed of thick-walled cells, full of starch like those in the cortical portion, but differs from it inasmuch as many of the cells contain red colouring matter. Large vascular bundles abound in the root; some of them are surrounded by a layer of stony cells . Commerce. — Two kinds are met with in this market, Surat and Kattiawar; the first is heavier and more aromatic than the second. Value, Surat Rs. 2 per maund of 37^ pounds. Kattiawar Re. 1|. Hermodactylus. ColchicacejE. Colchicum Sp.? Vernacular : Soorinjan (Hind., Bomb., Beng., Tam., Arab.). History, Uses, etc. — The Hermodactyl or “ Finger Third Series, No. 531. of Hermes,” was unknown to the early Greeks ; it appears to have been first used medicinally by the Arabs or later Greek physicians; it was first men¬ tioned by Alexander of Tralles, who flourished a. d. 560 lib. xi. It is deserving of special notice that under the name of surugen or hermodactyl, Serapion comprehends the koXxikov and tp-npepov of Dioscorides and the eppoScucTvXos of Paulus iEgineta (Pereira, vol. ii., pt. I., p. 166). Mesue and other early Arabian writers describe three kinds of her¬ modactyl, the white, yellow and black. In this they are followed by most of the more recent Mahometan writers. Meer Muhammad Husain tells us in his ‘Makhzan’ that the white is the best and that it is not bitter, next the yellow ; both may be used internally. The black, he says, is poisonous and only to be used externally. He describes the hermodactyl plant as having leaves like a leek and a yellow flower ; it is called in Persia ‘shambaleed.’ The black variety, he says, has red flowers. Mahometan physicians consider the drug to be deobstruent, alterative and aperient, especially useful in gout, rheumatism, liver and spleen. In gout they combine it with aloes ; with ginger and pepper it is lauded as an aphro¬ disiac ; a paste made of the bitter kind with saffron and eggs is applied to rheumatic and other swellings ; the powdered root is sprinkled on wounds to promote cicatrization. European physicians in India who have tried the drug consider the tasteless hermo¬ dactyl to be inert or nearly so and the bitter to have properties similar to colchicum (confer. ‘Phar. of India,’ p. 246). Description. — Surinjan-i-sheereen, or tasteless her¬ modactyl. Speaking of this drug, as furnished to him from India by Dr. Hoyle, Pereira says. “In their general form these conns resemble those of Colchi¬ cum autumnale. They are flattened, cordate, hol¬ lowed out or grooved on one side, convex on the other. At their lower part (forming the base of the heart) is a mark or disk for the insertion of the root fibres. Their size varies ; the specimens I have ex¬ amined were fromf— inch in length or height, 1 — inch in breadth, and about \ an inch in depth. They have been deprived of their coats, are exter¬ nally dirty yellow or brownish, internally white, easily broken, farinaceous, opaque, odourless, taste¬ less, -or nearly so, and worm eaten. They agree precisely with hermodactyl furnished me by Pro¬ fessor Guibourt. “Surinjan-i-talkh or bitter hermodactyl. The cor ms of this variety are distinguished from the preceding by their bitter taste, their smaller size, and by having externally a striped or reticulated appearance. Their colour for the most part is darker ; in some specimens it is blackish. One corm is ovate-cordate, 1 inch in height or length, £ of an inch broad and about £ inch thick, grooved or hollowed on one side, convex oil the other ; it is of a brownish-yellow colour, semi¬ transparent. has a horny appearance and is marked by longitudinal stripes, indicating a laminated struc¬ ture. A second is opaque, amylaceous, reticulated externally, white internally, less flattened, and of a remarkable shape, the concave or hollow side of the corm being continued half an inch below the mark for the attachment of the root fibres” ( ‘ Materia Med.,’ vol. ii., pt. I., p. 167), Pereira’s description agrees exactly with the hermodactyls of Bombay. Microscopic Structure.- -The stare a grams of the tasteless hermodactyl are large and muller shr;e:l. 170 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [August 28, 1880. Chemical Composition. — Le Canu. has analysed the tasteless variety and obtained the following result : starch (forming the bulk of the drug), fatty matter, yellow colouring matter, gum, supermalates of lime and potash and chloride of potassium. The bitter kind does not appear to have been examined. Commerce. — The hermodactyls are imported into Bombay from the Red Sea ports. Value Rs. J per lb. Substitute. — The sliced bulb of the true narcissus, imported from Persia, is sold in Bombay as bitter surinjcin. It may be at once detected by its larger size and tunicatecl structure. The taste is bitter and acrid, the substance amylaceous and very similar to that of the hermodactyl. It is used as an external application and according to the author of the ‘Makh- zan’ has properties very similar to those of surinjan-i- talkh. Value annas 3 per lb. Smilax china, Linn. Smilacejs. The root. Ver¬ nacular : Chob-chini (Hind., Beng., Bomb.) ; Paringay-puttay (Tam.). History, Uses, etc. — China root is described in native works on materia niedica as a new medicine. It appears to have been introduced into India from China by the Portuguese before the middle of the sixteenth century. The Arabs call it khashab-us- sini ; in India it is universally known by its Persian name, chub-chini (China wood). The author of the 1 Makhzan-ul-adwiya ’ has a long article upon its medicinal virtues. He also notices particularly the variable appearance of different samples of the drug, and directs that which is heavy, of a rosy colour, and free from knots, to be selected. He tells us that the fresh root is sometimes brought to India. Some of this he planted at Moorshidabad, a.h. 1178; it produced a climbing stem with small elongated leaves, not unlike a bamboo. After a year’s time he dug it up, but found that the roots had degenerated, and did not retain the qualities of the China article. Chob-chini, though now little used in Europe, still retains its celebrity in the East, and is consumed in enormous quantities both in India and China, the natives considering it to be antirheumatic, antisyphilitic, aphrodisiac and demul¬ cent. Description. — The tubers of chob-chini, which are formed upon the fibrous roots of the plant, are of the shape and size of an elongated kidney potato somewhat flattened, knotty, covered with a rusty coloured bark, sometimes smooth and shining, some¬ times rough ; internally their substance is of a pinkish- white colour, hard and farinaceous, insipid, mucilaginous and inodorous. The drug is usually peeled and trimmed, and consequently is of irregular form, resembling a piece of soft pinkish- white wood. 1 1 Microscopic Structure. — The bark consists of thick- walled dark-brown brick- shaped cells, which contain bundles of crystalline needles and resinous matter. The bulk of the tuber is made up of a parenchyma, the cells of which are large, thin- walled and loaded with starch; some pink colouring matter is also present. The starch grains are large, and have a radiate hilum. The vascular system is scalariform, and is associated with porous wood cells. Chemical Composition. — No active principle has been separated. Commerce. — The drug is brought to Bombay from Chinese ports and Singapore by the coasting steamers. Value, unpeeled, Rs. 3 — 4 per maund of 37^ lbs.; peeled, Rs. 9. ERIODICTYON CALIFORNICTTM.* BY WILLIAM C. HOLZHAUER. The leaves, exhausted by stronger alcohol and then by water, yielded the following results - 1. The alcoholic percolate, evaporated to the con* sistence of an extract, yielded, by distillation with water, a small amount of volatile oil, lighter than water, of a pale straw colour, aromatic taste and odour, but slightly resembling that of the leaves. The distillate was neutral to test paper. On boiling the alcoholic extract with water and allowing the liquid to cool, a crystalline sub¬ stance, of a yellowish- white colour and of a feathery appearance, deposited, destitute of taste and odour, in¬ soluble in cold water and benzin, sparingly soluble in hot water (the solution having a slight acid reaction), very soluble in chloroform, ether and alcohol. No alkaloids could be detected in the aqueous de¬ coction. The remainder of the aqueous decoction was then treated with a solution of acetate of lead, as long as a precipitate was thereby produced ; then filtered. The precipitate, having previously been thoroughly washed with cold water, was then diffused through alcohol, and decomposed by means of sulphuretted hydrogen, filtered, and the filtrate evaporated to dryness at a low tem¬ perature. The residue was a brittle substance, of a light brown colour, having an astringent, sour taste, proven to be tannin, the alcoholic solution of the tannin being perfectly clear, while that of the aqueous solution was turbid, and on the addition of ammonia or potassic hy¬ drate turned to a dark brown colour and became perfectly clear. The tannin gives a green precipitate with chloride of iron, acquiring a dirty appearance on standing. 2. Previously having treated the leaves with alcohol, they were then percolated with water. The percolate was of a dark brown colour, bitterish astringent taste and had a slightly acid reaction. After concentrating the percolate a part of it was treated with absolute alcohol, producing a precipitate of a dark brown colour, wholly soluble in water, and proven to be gum associated with brown colouring matter. The presence of sugar was detected by means of Trommer’s test. No alkaloids could be detected. A portion of the percolate was then treated with a solution of acetate of lead as long as a precipitate was thereby formed. The precipitate, collected on a filter and thoroughly washed with water, was then diffused through alcohol and de¬ composed by sulphuretted hydrogen, filtered, and the filtrate slowly evaporated to dryness by means of gentle heat. The product obtained was tannin, similar in ap¬ pearance and corresponding in all its reactions to that obtained from the alcoholic percolate. 3. A fresh quantity of leaves was exhausted by ether. The ethereal percolate was allowed to evaporate spon¬ taneously to the consistence of syrup. On boiling this with water a resinous mass was pre¬ cipitated. The supernatant liquid was of a pale straw colour, slightly aromatic taste and odour and of an acid reaction. Evaporating the supernatant liquid and allow¬ ing to cool, crystals were obtained similar to those of the. alcoholic extract, the quantity being too small to allow further investigation. Examination of the Resinous Precipitate. By treating with stronger boiling alcohol and allowing to cool, a soft, greenish, waxy substance separated, form¬ ing a pellicle. This substance was freed from colouring matter by continued washing with cold alcohol. The residue was proven to be vegetable wax, possessing a slightly greenish tinge. After treating the resinous pre¬ cipitate with boiling stronger alcohol there remained a soft, sticky substance, having neither taste nor odour, * From the American Journal of Pharmacy, August, 1880. August 28, 18 ?0.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 171 but slightly soluble in benzin and ether, readily soluble in chloroform, and from this solution was reprecipitated on the addition of alcohol, not volatile, burning with a sooty flame, which experiments prove its being identical with caoutchouc. The remaining alcoholic liquid was of a dark green colour ; after boiling and then digesting this liquid for twenty-four hours with animal charcoal, filtering, and subsequently evaporating by gentle heat, a brittle resin was obtained of an amber colour, aromatic, slightly bitter taste and faint odour. GLYCERIN CEMENT.* Hirzel obtained, in 1869, by triturating litharge with glycerin, a mass which he found useful as a cement for vessels containing benzol, ethereal oils, etc., as it pos¬ sessed the property of soon hardening. During the same year Pollack recommended the same mass as a cement for stone and iron ware, and pointed out that it was attacked only by strong acids ; also, that its dura¬ bility is the greater the more water the litharge had absorbed, since the latter when entirely dry yielded a cement of feeble adhesiveness only. Rost, in 1870, found this cement proof against concentrated [?] and diluted acids, alkaline lyes, ether, alcohol, benzol and carbon disulphide. The somewhat contradictory statements regarding the power of resistance against acids of this cement, as well as the desire to find out whether glycerin entered into a chemical combination with litharge, led Theodor Mo- rawski to investigate the subject. Regarding the che¬ mical combination, we may briefly state that he actually found this to be the fact. He obtained a definite com¬ pound, crystallizing in fine needles, which was found to be a glyceride of lead, of the composition C3H6Pb03. But tins compound, when isolated, is not of great stabi¬ lity, and would scarcely interest our readers. Our object is to draw attention to the practical applicability of the compound as a cement. From a large number of experiments instituted to ascertain the most favourable conditions for the pro¬ duction of a perfect cement, the author obtained the following results : — The hardest cement is produced by triturating 50 grams of litharge with 5 cubic centi¬ metres of glycerin. If more glycerin is used the mass hardens much more slowly and imperfectly. The small proportion of glycerin, however, makes it impracticable to prepare large quantities of the cement at a time. For this purpose it will be necessary to take more glycerin, in order to facilitate the trituration. But as it was also proved that the addition of a small quan¬ tity of water produced an equally durable cement, provided the proper proportions are observed, he found, after many trials, that the most favourable results are obtained by adding 2 volumes of water to 5 volumes of glycerin (sp. gr. 1'240) ; 6 cubic centimetres of this liquid are incorporated with 50 grams of litharge. This mass requires a shorter time than any other proportions to produce a hard cement, ten minutes only being required to harden moderately, while after two hours it becomes even harder than any mixture containing litharge with glycerin alone. But after a few days the latter com¬ pound (prepared without water) overtakes the former in hardness and remains so. If it is desired to produce a cement which rapidly hardens and still has considerable firmness, it is advisable to use water with the glycerin. — Dingier' s Polyt. Journ ., 235, 213. This form of cement appears to be applicable for many purposes in the laboratory as well as in drug houses. It may be used as luting for joints or as cement for stoppers, and probably also for mending stone, wedgewood and porcelain ware. Of course, it should not be forgotten that it contains lead. PRESENTATION TO PROFESSOR ATTFIELD. On Wednesday afternoon, at the conclusion of the proceedings of the British Pharmaceutical Conference, held at Swansea, Mr. Schacht rose and said : Mr. President, a duty has come to me by the accident of things, the responsibility of which I certainly feel to be very great ; but I confess I am able to face it all the more readily because of the great personal gratification which accompanies it. It will be remembered that on the occasion of our meeting last year at Sheffield it was announced by our Senior Honorary Secretary that it would be impossible for him to fulfil any longer the duties appertaining to that office, and he merely yielded to our urgent solicitations to continue them for another year on the clear under¬ standing that at this meeting his official connection with the Conference as its Honorary Secretary should terminate. When that announcement was made, but one feeling seemed to animate the minds of all members, and though at first something like a sensation of dismay obtruded itself lest we should find more difficulty than was subsequently ex¬ perienced in replacing so able an officer, that was speedily replaced by one unanimous feeling of gratitude to Professor Attfield for the great services he has rendered to the Con¬ ference. That sentiment naturally suggested that some formal expression should be given to it, and that idea soon took the form of a resolution that on this occasion a formal expression of our feelings should take place. Since on that occasion I had the honour to occupy the place now so ably filled by you, sir, I naturally became the Chairman of the Committee appointed to carry out the resolution, and hence the somewhat prominent part which I am now called upon to occupy in this matter. For many years I have had the pleasure of an intimate acquaintance with our friend, and charging my memory to strict accuracy, I can trace throughout all my knowledge of him nothing but one steady, constant effort to lead a good and useful life. As to its goodness, this is not, perhaps, the place to speak, and I will not dilate upon it further than to say that I believe that side of his character to be the mainspring of the other. It may not be inappropriate, perhaps, to say just a word or two on the point of Professor Attfield’s usefulness in his public life, which is, indeed, the cause of what we are now doing, and explains the enthusiasm with which the project has been received. Broadly speaking, it occurs to me that the usefulness of our friend’s life has consisted in this, that he first of all achieved a high and distinguished position for himself, and from that moment he has endeavoured to hold up both for our admiration and achievement that higher life of mental culture which is so plainly open to us in the very nature of our calling, but which we are very prone to forget in the experiences of business. It seems to me it has been in that constant protest against pharmacists sinking into anything like perfunctory drudges, and in his recommendation of the only genuine remedy for that, viz., that each man should do something, or at least try to do something, for the general good, that the main influence of Professor Attfield has rested. Beginning his pharmaceutical work somewhere about 1854, he carried away the only two medals which the # Reprinted from New Remedies , J une, 1880. 172 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [August 28, 18S0. school then offered its patient and industrious students ; he took the two medals in his year, and soon after became director of the laboratory, and finally, Professor of Practical Chemistry. Throughout the time he has held this appointment his usefulness and success in that capacity can be testified to by scores of our most eminent pharmacists, and the secret of his success seems to have been that he has adopted the scientific method of teaching his own science, and has steadily persevered in avoiding all those apparently royal roads which com¬ mend themselves to some to their own delusion, and has endeavoured constantly to urge that one steady course through the narrow way that leads to right. And for this, not pharmacists only, but the whole public, ought to feel, so far as they know the facts, something like gratitude. But possibly the most interest¬ ing point in our friend’s career was that at which he allowed himself to become the chief Honorary Secretary of this Conference. He. I am sure, would not wish me to attribute the whole success of this organization to his labours. He was associated in those days with men who had always been faithful to the cause, some of whom I see around me now, whilst some of them have gone to $heir rest ; but all were earnest in their endeavours to promote an organization which was aiming, as they thought and as he thought, at advancing the highest interests of pharmacy. They all laboured earnestly, but I am sure those gentlemen, and all who laboured with them, would wish me to say that they regard Professor Att field’s labours as the most prominent, and that they would accord to him a very large portion of the honour due to those who carried the infant through its early days into maturity. This project was initiated a year ago, and during the in¬ terval I am happy to remind you that Professor Attfield has received perhaps the highest reward which a scientific Englishman of the present day can seek. He has received the blue ribbon of science in being elected a Fellow of the Royal Society. But I am sure it will be gratifying to you all to remember that this little testimonial was initiated before the recognition of Professor Attfield’s claims on the part of the governing body of the Royal Society. I am sure you will all feel glad when I have finished, and I will, therefore, detain you no longer than to read this scroll which is supposed to accompany the presen¬ tation of some volumes of general literature, which are at present in London, where an opportunity will be presented to those who feel curious to see them to do so during the next few weeks, as they are too bulky to be brought down here: — ‘Presented, with about five hundred works of general literature, to J ohn Attfield, Ph.D., F. R.S., Professor of Practical Chemistry to the Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, etc., by Members of the British Pharmaceu¬ tical Conference, in token of their goodwill and hearty appreciation of his services as Senior Honorary Secretary of the Conference from it foundation in Newcastle-on - Tyne in 1863 to its meeting at Swansea in 1880.’ That is signed by myself as Chairman, F. B. Benger, Henry B. Brady, T. Hyde Hills, Theophilus Redwood, Richard Bremridge and Michael Carteighe, Honorary Secretary, as representing the large number of gentlemen who con¬ tributed to the memorial. I beg, with your permission, sir, to hand it to Professor Attfield. Professor Attfield, as soon as the cheering had sub. sided, rose and said : — Mr. President, Mr. Schacht, and gentlemen, I accept your very handsome testimonial with feelings of pleasure and of satisfaction which are simply inexpressible. As you have said, seventeen years of the prime of my life have been devoted, shoulder to shoulder with such honoured colleagues as Reynolds, and Brady, and Schacht, with Presidents who still gladden us with their presence, and Presidents who have passed away, to the founding, developing, and maintaining of the British Pharmaceutical Conference. My great reward — the greatest reward, as a matter of course — is seen in the great success of our joint labours. That success is great. We have, officers and members together, con¬ tributed, during the seventeen years of the life of the Pharmaceutical Conference, to the stock of pharma¬ ceutical knowledge four hundred original investigations, and we have done that without impoverishing in the slightest degree any other agency for the prosecution of original research. We have annually given opportunities for the leading chemists and druggists of Great Britain and Ireland to assemble together and exchange thoughts and opinions on pharmaceutical matters, and by the gen¬ erous aid of the local members in the towns we have visited have given them opportunities for friendly intercourse and good-fellowship, and these things have had the happiest results. And lastly, for the past ten years, we at all events have given to every one of our members not only the ordinary advantages of membership in a great association, but a record of the pharmaceutical discoveries made throughout the whole world, in the form of a ‘ Year-Book,’ which itself has been, I think, at least double the value of the annual subscription. I say again, my great reward is in contemplating the results of these, our joint labours. But, gentlemen, to have one’s life work appreciated and recognized by those for whom it has been more immediately undertaken and continued is extremely gratifying, and, therefore, I thank you from the depths of my consciousness for this most delightful present. Gentlemen, my wife will thank you, and my children will thank you too, for they are just entering on the paths of general literature ; and my library, although fairly well reflecting science, is not rich in those very works of general literature with which you now present me. I myself, at the age of fourteen, or a few weeks over, went from my school books straight to the study of works of chemistry, botany, pharmacy, and materia medica; but, like Enoch Arden, I have desired that my children should have even a better bringing up. And as for my wife, of whom I am sure I may say, ‘ many daughters have done virtuously, but thou excellest them all,’ I have long determined that she, now that the cares of teaching and training are getting less, should have the opportunity of having at command the works of those authors which a busy life (busy as mine) has only allowed of her having a partial acquaintance with, and you, by this present you now make me, enable me to realize one of my most cherished hopes. Gentlemen, I can only say that you could not possibly have gratified me and my family more than by publicly recognizing this work that I have done, the loving labour that I have undergone f item dolorcs lateris et pectoris. If Celsus sent his patients to the sea side it seems that sometimes they required a compensation which is not unknown at the present day:— “ At the sea coast I shall expect to find My wines of genuine and of smoother kind.” There is nothing new under the sun. Luxurious ex¬ travagance and want usually run side by side. We know the Roman rulers had to provide bread for the poor — panem et circenses — but the latter our poor laws do not supply. Luxury and penury alike lead to disease ; the happy medium between the two to health; and I am rather under the impression that through the influence of hard times the pharmacist of the present day is suffer¬ ing from a turn in the tide tending towards moderation. The first book of Celsus treats of general regimen for healthy people, with special instructions for the treatment of small ailments. Some of these directions were rendered necessary by the luxury just spoken of ; for instance, the custom of vomiting after meals. Celsus tells us that the Greeks divided medicine into three branches : the first, dietetic ; the second, pharmaceutical ; the third, chirur- gical. The next book treats of the prognostics of disease and its treatment by the dietetic method, with copious * Francis’s Horace. August 2S, 1SS0.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 183 information respecting the various foods and their proper use. Celsus also makes a variety of observations respect¬ ing seasons, winds, age, temperament and other conditions of health. One passage struck me as of interest to middle- I&ged philosophers like ourselves, At ostas media tutissima est, quce neque juventce calore, neque senectutis frigore in- festatur. There is much discretion and sound sense in the description of the various foods, both animal and vegetable. Generally speaking, foods may be said to have not more than a personal interest for pharmacists ; but special aids for the digestion are attracting present notice, and with respect to farinaceous foods it is pro¬ bable that more may yet be discovered as to suitable dietetic mixtures of these aliments. The Romans used a variety of cereals, as foreign wheat, winter wheat, siligo, a second kind of wheat, rye, barley, oats, rice, panicle and millet ; and of legumes beans, peas, lentils and lupins. Some of these were of good juice ( boni sued), some of evil. Of flours, may be mentioned siligo and pollen, varieties of fine flour, amylum, whole meal, bran and fur, which was perhaps a kind of groats. Alica, a pre¬ paration of much repute, was made of rounded grains deprived of husk and whitened with chalk for use, some¬ times ordered washed. It was said by Pliny to be obtained from a plant called zea, and is translated maize ; but this cannot be correct, as maize is a native of South America. I would refer those who desire more information to the book itself, but they must remember that lentils and whole meal have been appropriated, the former at least to somebody’s advantage. Sorbitio, slops or gruel, and ptisan (barley water, etc.), were favourite remedies. The latter name has been preserved by the French in their tisanes, but has been abandoned on this side of the channel. In dealing with farinacea we arrive at the directions for the cataplasm or poultice, of which there is more variety than now employed. Cataplasmata are directed to be made with flour, fine or coarse ; and with barley, vetch, darnel, millet, panick, lentil, bean, lupin, linseed or fenugreek meal, boiled and applied hot ; besides which a variety of drugs are employed to render them emollient, rubefacient, or stimulant. Gestation, that is exercise of divers kinds, friction, fomentation, baths, etc., are hardly pharmaceutical remedies, but clysters were administered, some of which were the same as are now used. The fourth book is more purely medical, and treats of diseases of certain parts of the body ; and catarrh, being : considered a local disease, we light upon the word destillatio, which suggests an interesting comparison between the use of words adopted in modern times from the Latin, and the original meaning of the same words in the Augustan age. I may remark that this work of Celsus was the mine from which the medical writers, on the revival iof learning, drew their medical Latin. In the word destillatio the allusion is to the humour which distils into the nostrils, distillation being synonymous with catarrh. The word destillatio is several times used, mutatis mutandis, with a like meaning, and in no. other sense. Pulvis, as might be expected, is used with its proper and present meaning, but tinctus (the word tinctura does not occur) is used only in the sense of. dipped, as in the case of water into which a smith’s hot iron has been frequently dipped, which is said powerfully to affect the spleen. Decoctum continues as of old, decocta being numerous, but all extempore preparations. Infusum, however, is only used with its original meaning of pouring upon, as cold water poured upon the head. Neither liquor nor solutio are used in our technical sense, or in any way approaching to it ; the term liquid as distinguished from solid is of course frequently to be met with. . Pro¬ bably at a much later period solution of any principle in water was, as we shall presently see, but little understood. In like manner essentia is something new altogether. The word extractum occurs a few times, and in the preparation of Artedace I thought I had met with its use in the modem sense. Certain preparations are directed to be boiled “ donee extracta inde gutta indurescat .” But I was too hasty, it was not the pharmacist’s technical meaning. Spiritus is used only in the sense of breath or breathing, wind and air ; what may be termed the spirituous appli¬ cation of the word did not then exist ; it evidently grew out of the sense of something purified, refined, or ethereal. I may remark in this connection that the nam efermentum was given to yeast. The word pilula is not to be met with, though we may find pills under another name ; it is used by Pliny and is the diminutive of pila, a ball ; singularly enough pita is a mortar. The word linimentum did not yet exist ; but there are liquids “ quce illinuntur ,” a direction still given by physicians. These liquids, Celsus tells us, were called enchrista by the Greeks, a word still surviving in christen, which means to anoint rather than to sprinkle. The word linamentum signified lint or linen, linteum being a word also used. Gollyrium was used in a somewhat more extended sense than that of “ eye lotion,” as will be presently explained. Gargarisma is not used, but the verb from which it was derived is to be frequently met with. Referring to the general subject of the book, we find that for the diseases described special medicines and treat¬ ment are directed. Amongst the medicines occur the standing formulae, and also a variety of extempore prepara¬ tions ; amongst these may be mentioned some to be taken internally, as decoctions and the juice of fresh plants. One preparation is still known and has not altogether lost its popularity, that is acetum scillae ; this, however, was no baby in the time of Celsus, as it was said to have been used by Pythagoras five hundred years before. We now arrive at the fifth book where, having left the region of dietetic treatment, which, however, includes, as we have seen, the use of a number of medicines, Celsus enters upon the consideration of diseases more usually combated with the aid of drugs. Erasistratus, he says, and others who styled themselves empirics, put great con¬ fidence in medicines, but Asclepiades, for whose opinions Celsus seems to have had the greatest respect, pretty much laid aside the use of them — “ with some reason, as most medicines offend the stomach, affording bad juices,” — and turned his attention to the food ( victus ). Celsus, however, judiciously advises either class to look to both means of cure, and as medicines have peculiar powers he commences by reciting their names and virtues. This sketch being specially intended to bear upon the history of pharmacy, and not upon that of materia medica — a wider and most interesting subject — I will merely allude in general terms to the substances mentioned in the text. In the first place drugs are classed under their respective properties and uses, and it is rather a surprise to find that these generally have reference to their external action upon the body, but we may remember that the very earliest allusions we have respecting pharmacy are to oint¬ ments. For instance, in Exodus xxx. myrrh, cinnamon, calamus and cassia with olive oil are to be obtained, “and thou shalt make it an oil of holy ointment, an ointment compound after the art of the apothecary.” That enter¬ prising lady, Medea, also compounded an ointment to render Jason invulnerable. Other instances might be given. So Celsus introduces styptics, vulneraries, diges¬ tives, cleansers, rodents, caustics, resolvents, and so forth. Aperientia open mouths in bodies, which the Greeks call stomata. Purgantia purge wounds and not bowels. Let me give one short section by way of example of the drugs used, that of evacuants and drawing remedies, viz., lada- num ( Cistus creticus), round alum, omphacium (verjuice), gall, chalcitis (copperas), bdellium, turpentine, and pine resin, propolis (bee glue), dry figs boiled, dove’s dung, pumice, meal of darnel, green figs boiled in water, elate - rium, bay berries, nitre (soda ? ) and salt. Although in this synopsis of the materia medica allusion is made almost exclusively to the external application of diugs, it must not be supposed that such is their only use; for instance in the previous book a long list is given of dr reties to be taken internally, and we shall find similar examples in the 184 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [August 28, issa 1 list of preparations. Celsus mentions from first to last per¬ haps four hundred drugs. Many of these have continued in use to the present day and the list contains some of our most valuable drugs, as scammony, aloes, opium, hyoscyamus, cantharides, ammoniacum, etc. It will be remembered that the Mediterranean coasts produced many ■ species of drugs, and that the east, with its aromatics, its gums and balsams was open to the trade of Europe through Antioch and Alexandria. Amongst the minerals men¬ tioned are metallic earths and oxides, mostly native, but some produced, and which include in some shape or other arsenic, copper, lead, iron, zinc and antimony. Silver and gold were not officinal, but the latter was used for fasten¬ ing loose teeth. Soda, potash, and lime were the alkalies, acetic the only acid. Wine is freely used both on its own account and as a vehicle. Passum (a kind of raisin wine) and mulsum (hydromel) were also freely used. Most of the articles are well known and identified, others doubtful, whilst of others, as Targa, one of the editors of Celsus said : “ Quimonstrabit quid sit erit mihi magnus Apollo ponder¬ ing on which passage led me to think of the honours be¬ stowed on pharmacists — one may by chance get a degree honoris causa, or a phenomenal F.R.S. Something between a profession and a trade, there is not even a doctorate of pharmacy. Pharmaceutical preparations are naturally introduced by a summary of the weights and measures used in com¬ pounding them. The ounce is divided into seven denarii of about 62 grains each, and the denarius into six sextan tes, a sextans being equivalent to the Greek obolus, or a little more than J a scruple. Simplicia, simples, is the name given by Celsus to un¬ compounded drugs, a designation that lasted longer than the day when Shakspere 'wrote of one “culling of simples,” but now seems to have disappeared. Celsus says, “scepe simplicia opitulentur, scepe mixta,” and in this last word, compounding of simples, lies the chief of the pharmaceutic art, the culling being left to others. Perhaps it is vanity to magnify our office ; this designation of its duties reads simply enough, the words run smoothly; but he that has practised pharmacy alone knows its sinuosities and responsibilities. I say sinuosities, which may seem an odd word to use, but pharmacy, more than most pro¬ fessions, requires of its follower knowledge both in the highways and byeways of learning, and he often has to deplore, to himself at least, his ignorance, whilst he may apply to his profession the well-worn quotation — for did not Hippocrates the father of medicine originate it? — Vita brevis, longa ars .” To recur to the text. External applications, as may be expected, are most prominent. Malagmata have the first place. A malagma was a plastic application ; something between a plaster and a poultice. There are thirty-six formulae given, some of them being named according to their properties, as malagma for pleurisy, for the gout, the liver, the spleen, etc., whilst others bear the name of their inventor, as Moschus, Chrjsippus, Ctesiphon. Next come plasters, “ emplastra” twenty nine kinds. Some of these have for their basis litharge ( spuma argenti) and olive oil ; and it is directed that when these are ordered they are to be boiled together, so that we follow in making our plasters the method employed at Rome eighteen hundred years ago. Special qualities are given by the addition of verdigris, minium, galbanum, cerussa alba, etc. Basilicon is older than the image of the Royal Stuart, with which I had associated it ; its formula is panax — perhaps opoponax — galbanum, pitch, resin, and oil. Then come pastils ( pastilli ), which the Greeks called trochisJcous, in which we follow the Greeks, cutting off the tail of the word for the sake of euphony. Pastils or troches are made of dry medicaments, mixed up with a liquid not greasy, as wine or vinegar, and afterwards dried. When used they are to be moistened with the same liquid. There are seven kinds, six of which are to be applied externally ; but the seventh is to undergo what we consider to be the legitimate disposition of such named remedies. This kind is for the stone, and as the formula and directions for use are given after the manner of a’ modern prescription, I will quote in full the classic Latin of Celsus : — “ Cassice, croci, myrrhce, costi, nardi, cinnamomiy dulcis radicis, balsami, hy per ici, pares portiones conterentur; deinde vinum lene instillatur, et pastilli fiunt, qui singuli habeant P. X ={sextantem) hique singuli quotidie mane jejuno dantur.” Next come pessaries ( pessi ). These remedies have of late had considerable popularity ; but the pessaries of Celsus had soft wool as a foundation, which was saturated with some oleaginous or other preparation, of which | there are nine kinds ; the last, if effective, though costly, might be worth notice, “si non comprehendit, adeps leonina ex rosa (61.) mollienda est.” These are followed by compound powders, all for application, except a sternuta¬ tory, of which white hellebore is the basis. Gargles are described, and the formulae of antidotes are given. Of these the most celebrated is Mithridates, by taking which daily the monarch of that name secured himself against the danger of poisoning. This medicine survives to our day ; but its glory has departed. Acopa are a species of liniment. Catapotia are the predecessors of our modem pills. No directions are given for dividing the mas3 when made, the only instructions being that the size of a vetch seed, a pea, a bean, an Egyptian bean, or a lupin, as the case may be, is to be gulped down (devorasse). One formula is anodyne, in which papaveris lacrimce is directed to be used, and in a second for a cough — Athenionis — the same drug is directed to be used, and two catapotia the size of our bean (fabce nostrce) a#re to be taken morning and night. This dose would be equivalent to 20 grains or 2^ grains of opium, which indicates some discrepancy of weights. The same discrepancy is shown in the dose of elaterium as given by Dioscorides, viz., an obolus, which, if the strength were the same as at present used, would pro¬ bably be an obolus for Charon. A few miscellaneous preparations conclude the list of regulation formulae* In the next book is a long list of collyria, of which many are solids, to be dissolved or used as a penicillium , as the case may be. I have now brought to an end my brief sketch of the Pharmacopoeia of Celsus. If I have made mistakes in rendering it, I trust I may be forgiven. I have met with some myself. For instance Celsus tells us that if a sanguisuga be swallowed salt and vinegar should be given. One editor says, apropos of this, that in every other place Celsus calls the leech hirudo. I take another edition with a good index and find six references to hirudines, but as they all prove to be hirundines, much more agreeable animals, I am still in doubt as to whether Celsus “ordered leeches.” I could mention other discrepancies; but, as I say, I ask easy measure for myself. There is yet a practical phase that neither physician, pharmacist nor the public would let pass in those days any more than in these present, namely the pecuniary, and we find it treated of in Horace : — “ * Take the ptisan ! What will it cost ? * * ‘Nay, hold, A very trifle.’ ‘ Sir, I will be told.’ ‘ Threepence.’ ‘ Alas, what does it signify, Whether by doctors or by thieves I die ? ”’ * The ptisan of the text was rice water ; but advice might have been included. It is the old story, he spends a fortune over a dish, but grudges eight asses, say sixpence for being cured of the effects of it. Let us again take up the history of pharmacy. After a lapse of one thousand six hundred years great and mighty changes had come over the world. Pharmacy had also experienced its vicissitudes. Many searching spirits had arisen, and a new science was being unfolded to the world by a name unknown to Celsus. Alchemy and chemistry were born and grew together. With their history are associated the names of Paul Valentine with his “ currus triumph alls antimonii ” and his discovery of Francis’s Horace. August; 2S, 1380.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRAN S ACTIONS. 185 sulphuric acid, Raymond Lully, Roger Bacon, Albertus Magnus, and that prominent and burly hgure Taia cslsus — • “ The wonderous Paracelsus, the dispensei Of life ; the commissary of fate, the idol Of princes, - ” the destroyer of Galenism and a man of great genius, but a most egregious quack; author of a new medicine and a new theology ; commonly believed to possess the double tincture, namely, the power of transmuting metals, and of curing diseases. Not much of his own survives, but appropriator.*. have made good use of his ideas. Hence¬ forward we have chemical as well as galenical remedies. The times had been strange, wild and irregular. Magic, superstition and astrology had ahold upon physic, as upon most things spiritual and temporal. Things medical,, as things in general, were, however, now gradually improving in most countries of Europe, and in 1618 was issued the London Pharmacopoeia, henceforth to be the law of the pharmacist. In early times it had a hard struggle to hold its own ; the old views of things survived, new heresies arose; it followed but did not lead, but in following began the ascent to the proud position the British Pharmacopoeia now occupies. It is not, how¬ ever, to the Pharmacopoeia Londinensis, but to the phar¬ macy of the times, irregular perhaps, that I wish to call your attention for a few minutes, and this is o e found in the dispensatories. A famous dispensatory of the seventeenth century was that of Dr. William Salmon, Professor of Phy sick who lived “at the Blew Ball by the ditch side nigh Holborn Bridge,” which went through many editions.. It is professedly a translation of. the Pharmacopoeia wit explanations and commentaries, and a dictionary of the materia medica. The doctor is not afraid to make animadversions upon the work of the august fellows o “the Colledge,” which it appears was . lately reformed. For instance there follows the directions foi me i o plaster:— “A learned but long discourse, the Colledge here talks almost like an apothecary as the vulgar phrase is; but not half so well.” An interesting phrase this, and by the way, the apothecaries must have taken the ability to talk with them when they went over in 1815. Men were outspoken and hard hitters in those days, the amenities of life were less understood than at present. This may be termed the redundant age of pharmacy. The revival of learning had brought forward all the old knowledge stored up in the pages of Pliny, Galen and Dioscorides, and other ancient writers. In England, Gerard, Parkinson and the herbalists were opening these stores to the public view ; as Salmon says, “ In the very best authors extant a great part are collections, a fact probably true of many authors of the present day. Chemistry had begun to contribute its share. Super¬ stition had not died out, cures being still performed “ astrologically, galenically and chymically. Not long before this, Jerome Cardan, the first physician of his time in Europe, professor of mathematics and a philosopher, was accustomed to draw the horoscopes of his patients, and himself believed in them. The conflict between . the old and the new, between rationalism and dogmatism, had commenced even in pharmacy, but as yet . that science was blessed with a superabundance of material. Salmon himself was a bit of a quack, even as the times went. I will give a slight sketch of his book.. The first book treats of simples — the vegetable materia medica , the second of animals, including man, birds, beasts, serpents, insects and fishes. Many of the substances mentioned are preparations, not simples.. Man s body, living or dead, affords thirty-nine medicaments, so it may readily be imagined that hardly a bone or tissue, a secretion or excretion but plays its useful part. A list merely would be amusing reading, but hardly fitted to the proprieties of the present day. So through the whole zoologia, the obscene preparations, of which we find a few even in Celsus and many in Dioscorides, were in full force ; and it is odd to figure to oneself the disgusting compounds that may have been swallowed by the good people whose lives we read the story of, as well as by the wicked and the great unwashed. Tanpora mutuntuv tt nos mutamur in illis ; the fastidious tastes of those days were probably very different from the fastidious tastes of the present day. Custom reconciles men to strange per¬ formances. Erancis Rabelais was a physician, and there was a good deal of the grotesque spirit of pantagruelism about middle age medicine. Next follows the mineralogia, and then the preparations of the Pharmacopoeia, translated and copied with consider¬ able comments and additions. These are divided into com¬ pounds internal and compounds external, and we now meet with the names that are still in use in the present day. A few have fallen out of use, as magisteries— pre¬ cipitates both mineral and vegetable — except that perhaps now and then the magistery of bismuth is heard of. Quiddonies, kinds of rob or syrup, apparently pleasant preparations, have disappeared altogether, and lohochs survive only in the lohoch sanum, a name which in my district is curiously modified so as to have caused a totally different preparation to be substituted. But I would here remark that the fine old remedies and recipes that people used formerly for their minor complaints have very much succumbed before those all-promising but mostly delusive shams called patent medicines. . ^ The next book treats of the ‘ Practice of Chymistry, and has chapters on principles, instruments, dissolution, sublimation, etc. ; that on fermentation is as. follows :— “ Fermentation is a certain manifestation of life fitting it for a resuscitation, and without which it would remain captivated within the bonds or chains of death ; or, it. is the breaking of the bond of corruption and putrefaction by the power of life assisted by a homogene matter or principle already freed.” Quincy, who wrote perhaps fifty years afterwards by the light of his modern days Quincy, whom in my junior days I always considered to be the grandfather and general ancestor of pharmacology, because his was the oldest book upon our shelves— remarks, quoting the passage : “ And what confused stuff is this from Salmon !” But is there so much, fault to be found with it? The modern problems of biology were very far beyond Quincy’s ken, who proves fermentation to arise from unequal specific gravities— a sort of here we go up, up, up— there we go down, down, down process ; but Salmon seems to have had a glimpse, if but a hazy one, of the truth, and if he wrote most delicious nonsense upon many subjects it may at least be said for him that on this he wrote what may well pass muster with much that is termed speculative philosophy in the present very modern times. I shall not trace my way to the pharmacy of the present day by the direct path, but will, just touch upon a work or two that indicate the way in which the old follow-my-leader style of writing gave place to that which culminated in ‘ Pharmacographia. Remedies from newly discovered lands must necessarily be treated cle novo . As early as 1661, a beautiful little book was tmblished at Venice, written by Gandentius Brunacius, ‘De Cina Cina seu Pulvere ad Febres.’ I. said newly imported drugs required new treatment ; this is true to a certain extent, but yet this author is i soaked through and through with the old ideas. He tells how the bark was introduced, and then he discusses its nature, and through the book as far as I have read it dwells at intervals upon this one theme, which evidently em¬ barrasses him, viz., its quality of heat and dryness. Galen gives every plant its four degrees of heat or cold, dryness^ or moisture, and almost every writer down to a later period than this follows him. they^oui f them out would take a magnus Apollo to tell. What is cold and dryness ? Is it a positive quality, as Galen has it says Brunacius, or is it, as Cardan, m his book De Subtditate ’ (on final causes, etc.), says, a mere absence of heat? Author after author amongst the ancients is 186 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [August 28, 1SS9. quoted, and logical proofs are given, illustration after illustration, but still he is not satisfied. How heat can exist in wood is a problem in physics he cannot clearly comprehend, though he calls to his aid the case of the burning mirror, by which the vestal virgins rekindled the sacred fire, the case of the Apulian rustics who produced fire by the friction of dry sticks, and that of the hair- cutters, who say their instruments draw sparks from the heads of their clients. Then further how the heat or the cold of the bark acts upon the heat or cold of the fever, though puzzling, is a question that it becomes a ‘ Syntagma Physiologicum ’ to answer, and it is done accordingly. After this, we have the pharmacy of the drug, and the ninth chapter treats and proves very satisfactorily to our author “ why cina cina should be given infused in wine;” on the other hand the next chapter answers the question whether cina cina should be exhibited in water in the form of infusion or decoction, and the answer given in the first line reminds me of Punch's advice to people about to marry, Respondeo neutro modo esse prcebendum, and the reason follows, that decoction in water takes away the strength of medicines so prepared. This book must be one of the earliest extant specially treating upon cinchona, and it fixes the date at which it was brought to Rome to Cardinal Lugo by the Jesuits as the year of jubilee, 1650. In 1681 was issued ‘A New Mystery in Physick dis¬ covered by Curing of Fevers and Agues by Quinquina or Jesuites Powder.’ This is a little book translated from the French of Dr. Belon, preceded by an introduction by an English author which contains a great deal of very curious chemistry. Although but a few years had elapsed since the former work, either the time or the place of writing has caused a wonderful difference in the treatment of the subject. The ancients are altogether left out of consideration, and a much more rational view is taken. The pharmacy is extended, wine is still the favourite vehicle, but there are also tincture, extract, infusion, pills ; altogether the book reads much more pleasantly than the stilted English works of the same period. One step more and in 1769 we are landed in the gentle and respectable sobriety that characterized the pharmacy and materia medica of this present age until brightened by the influence of Dr. Pereira, and this step we take in the company of Dr. Canvane of Bath, whose dissertation on the Oleum Palmse Christi reached a second edition in 1769. There is a little bit of history in the announcement that “ the oil since my first publication of this pamphlet is now become officinal, it being sold at the Apothecaries’ Hall and several other shops in London and Bath,” but it may be added that this was rather a late introduction as the seeds were used by Hippocrates 1200 B.C. Dr. Canvane deals most fully with the therapeutical value of the oil, but he does not forget the pharmaceutical, and he introduces us to “ the uncom¬ parable Dr. Huxham of Plymouth,” whose name is, I fear, gradually being forgotten by pharmacists. Not so that of Mr. Goulard, who flourished the triumphant motto “ Redeunt Saturnia Regna ; ” the extract of Saturn is forgotten, but as Mr. Goulard’s extract it survives, and if his name is “written in water” it is also written in lead. Mr. Goulard’s work is well known ; but the three others I have alluded to, especially the first, are, I believe, f considerable rarity. I have now brought to a close my sketch of a few aspects of the history of pharmacy. My original inten¬ tion was also to have said something of the pharmacy of the present ; but I have already had to cut my story short. Whether many pharmacists can find time to trouble much about the pharmacy of the past when that of the present gives them so much to think of is perhaps rather doubtful, but there is at least considerable interest of a quaint sort to be gathered from it, and I cannot but think that if the history of pharmacy, which has not yet been written, were well put together it would be worthy of the doing. If pharmacy advanced slowly, the same may be said of medicine, which from the time of Galen to the sixteenth century gathered little or nothing but the dust and cobwebs of scholastic theories. Then the sap began to flow in the barren stems of many sciences. Pharmacy was benefited by the advance made in natural philosophy and chemistry, and chemists of repute were found in the ranks of its followers. It for long, however, occupied but a second place as a subsidiary branch of medicine, and it was only in the present century that it first stood alone. Since then its growth has been rapid, a constant process, of evolution and survival of the fittest. Its scientifie history is written in the Year-Books of this Conference, and in the J ournals of the Pharmaceutical Society, and its commercial, for it is a commerce, in the painstaking and moderately rewarded lives of its numerous followers. Mr. Grose, Swansea, moved — ‘ That the best thanks of the members of the Conference be given to the President for his very valuable and instructive address. Mr. Greenish, in seconding the motion, said he need only refer to the passage in which allusion was made to the late Mr. Stoddart ; those who had been in the habit of attending these meetings, and were ab all acquainted with Mr. Stoddart, must heartily sympathize with what had been said. Mr. Hughes, Llandilos, having supported the motion, Mr. Brady, as Senior Vice President, put it to the meeting, when it was carried unanimously. (To be continued.) THE BRITISH ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE. The meeting of the above Association commenced on Monday, August 23, at Swansea, under the Presidency of. Andrew Crombie Ramsay, LL.D., F.R.S., V.P.G.S., Director General of the Geological Survey of the United Kingdom, and of the Museum of Practical Geology, who delivered the opening address : — The President’s Address. ON THE RECURRENCE OF CERTAIN PHENOMENA IN GEOLOGICAL TIME. In this address I propose to consider the recurrence of the same kind of incidents throughout all geological time, as exhibited in the various formations and groups of for¬ mations that now form the known parts of the external crust of the earth. This kind of investigation has for many years forced itself on my attention, and the method I adopt has not heretofore been attempted in all its branches. In older times, Hutton and Playfair, in a broad and general manner, clearly pointed the way to the doctrine of uniformity of action and results, throughout all known geological epochs down to the present day ; but after a time, like the prophets of old, they obtained but slight attention, and were almost forgotten, and the wilder cosmical theories of Werner more generally ruled the opinions of the geologists of the time. Later still, Lyell followed in the steps of Playfair, with all the advantages that the discoveries of William Smith afforded, and aided by the labours of that band of distinguished geologists, Sedgwick, Buckland, Mantell, De la Beche, Murchison, and others, all of whom some of us knew. Notwithstand¬ ing this new light, even now there still linger the relics of the belief (which some of these geologists also main¬ tained), that the physical phenomena which produced the older strata were not only different in kind, but also in degree from those which now rule the external world. Oceans, the waters of which attained a high temperature, attended the formation of the primitive crystalline rocks. Volcanic eruptions, with which those of modern times are comparatively insignificant, the sudden upheaval of great mountain chains, the far more rapid decomposition and degradation of rocks, and, as a consequence, the more rapid deposition of strata formed from their waste — all these were assumed as certainties, and still linger in some I August2S, 1880.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 187 parts of the world among living geologists of deservedly high reputation. The chief object of this address is, therefore, to attempt to show, that whatever may have been the state of the world long before geological history began, as now written in the rocks, all known formations are comparatively so recent in geological time, that there is no reason to believe that they were produced under physical circumstances differing either in kind or degree from those with which we are now more or less familiar. It is unnecessary for my present purpose to enter into details connected with the recurrence of marine forma¬ tions, since all geologists know that the greater part of the stratified rocks were deposited in the sea, as proved by the molluscs and other fossils which they contain, and the order of their deposition and the occasional strati- graphical breaks in succession are also familar subjects. What I have partly to deal with now, are exceptions to true marine stratified formations, and after some other important questions have been considered, I shall proceed to discuss the origin of various non-marine deposits from nearly the earliest known time down to what by compa¬ rison may almost be termed the present day. Metamorphism. All, or nearly all, stratified formations have been in a sense metamorphosed, since, excepting certain limestones, the fact of loose incoherent sediments having been by pressure and other agencies turned into solid rocks con¬ stitutes a kind of metamorphism. This, however, is only a first step toward the kind of metamorphism the frequent recurrence of which in geological time I have now to in¬ sist upon, and which implies that consolidated strata have undergone subsequent changes of a kind much more re¬ markable. Common stratified rocks chiefly consist of marls, shales, •slates, sandstones, conglomerates, and limestones, gene¬ rally distinct and definite ; but not infrequently a stratum, or strata, may partake of the characters in varied pro¬ portions of two or more of the above-named species. It is from such strata that metamorphic rocks have been pro¬ duced, exclusive of the metamorphism of igneous rocks, on which I will not enter. These may be looked for in every manual of geology, and usually they may be found in them. As a general rule, metamorphic rocks are apt to be much contorted, not only on a large scale, but also that the individual layers of mica quartz and felspar in gneiss arejaent and folded in a great number of minute convo¬ lutions, so small that they may be counted by the hun¬ dred in a foot or two of rock. Such metamorphic rocks are often associated with masses of granite both in bosses and in inters fcratified beds or layers, and where the meta¬ morphism becomes extreme it is often impossible to draw a boundary line between the gneiss and the granite; while, on the other hand, it is often impossible to draw any true boundary between gneiss (or other metamorphic rocks) and the ordinary strata that have undergone meta¬ morphism. Under these circumstances, it is not sur¬ prising that when chemically analysed, there is often little difference in the constituents of the unmetamorphosed and the metamorphosed rock. This is a point of some importance in relation to the origin and non-primitive character of gneiss and other varieties of foliated strata, and also of some quartzites and crystalline limestones. I am aware that in North America formations con¬ sisting of metamorphic rocks have been stated to exist of older date than the Laurentian gneiss, and under any circumstances it is obvious that vast tracts of pre- Laurentian land must have existed in all regions, by the degradation of which, sediments were derived where¬ with to provide materials for the deposition of the originally unaltered Laurentian strata. In England, Wales and Scotland, attempts have also been made to prove the presence of more ancient formations, but I do not consider the data provided sufficient to warrant any such conclusion. In the Highlands of Scotland, and in some of the Western Isles, there are gneissic rocks of pre- Cambrian age, which, since they were first described by Sir Roderick Murchison in the north-west Highlands, have been, I think justly, considered to belong to the Laurentian series, unconform ably underlying Cambrian and Lower Silurian rocks, and as yet there are no sufficient grounds for dissenting from his conclusion that they form the oldest known rocks in the British Islands. It is unnecessary here to discuss the theory of the causes that produced the metamorphism of stratified rocks, and it may be sufficient to say, that under the influence of deep underground heat, aided by moisture, sandstones have been converted into quartzites, lime¬ stones have become crystalline, and in shaley, slaty, and schistose rocks, under like circumstances, there is little or no development of new material, but rather, in the main, a rearrangement of constituents according to their chemical affinities in rudely crystalline layers, which have very often been more or less developed in pre¬ existing planes of bedding. The materials of the whole are approximately the same as those of the unaltered rock, but have been rearranged in layers, for example, of quartz, felspar and mica, or of hornblende, etc., while other minerals, such as schorl and garnets, are of not infrequent occurrence. It has for years been an established fact that nearly the whole of the mountain masses of the Highlands of Scotland (exclusive of the Laurentian, Cambrian and Old Red Sandstone formations) mostly consist of gneissic rocks of many varieties, and of quartzites and a few bands of crystalline limestone, which, from the north shore to the edge of the Old Red Sandstone, are repeated again and again in stratigraphical convolutions, great and small. Many large bosses, veins and dykes of granite are associated with these rocks, and, as already stated, it sometimes happens that it is hard to draw a geological line between granite and gneiss and vice versa. These rocks, once called Primary or Primitive, were first proved by Sir Roderick Murchison to be of Lower Silurian age, thus revolutionizing the geology of nearly one-half of Scotland, To the same age belongs by far the greater part of the broad hilly region of the south of Scotland that lies between St. Abb’s Head on the east and the coast of Ayrshire and Wigtonshire on the west. In the south-west part of this district, several great masses of granite rise amid the Lower Silurian rocks, which in their neighbourhood pass into mica-schist and even into fine-grained gneiss. In Cornwall the occurrence of Silurian rocks is now well known. They are of metamorphic character, and partly associated with granite ; and at Start Point, in South Devonshire, the Silurian strata have been meta¬ morphosed into quartzites. In parts of the Cambrian areas, Silurian rocks in contact with granite have been changed into crystalline hornblendic gneiss, and in Anglesey there are large tracts of presumed Cambrian strata, great part of which have been metamorphosed into chlorite and mica-schist and gneiss, and the same is partly the case with the Lower Si¬ lurian rocks of the centre of the island, where it is almost impossible to disentangle them from the associated granite. In Ireland similar metamorphic rocks are common, and, on the authority of Professor Hull, who knows them well, the following statements are founded: — “Metamorphism in Ireland has been geographical and not stratigraphical, and seems to have ceased before the Upper Silurian period. “ The epoch of greatest metamorphism appears to have been that which intervened between the close of the Lower Silurian period and the commencement of the Upper Silurian, taking the formations in ascending order. “ it is as yet undecided whether Laurentian rocks occur in Ireland. There are rocks in north-west Mayo very like those in Sutherlandshire, but if they are of Laurentian age they come directly under the metamor¬ phosed Lower Silurian rocks, and it may be very difficult to separate them. 188 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [August 28, 1880. “Cambrian purple and green grits are not metamor¬ phosed in the counties of Wicklow and Dublin, but the same beds at the southern extremity of County Wexford, near Carnsore Point, have been metamorphosed into mica schist and gneiss. “ In the east of Ireland the Lower Silurian grits and slates have not been metamorphosed, except where in proximity to granite, into which they insensibly pass in the counties of Wicklow, Dublin, Westmeath, Cavan, Longford and Down ; but in the west and north-west of Ireland they have been metamorphosed into several varieties of schists, hornblende-rock, and gneiss , or foliated granite." It would be easy to multiply cases of the metamor¬ phism of Silurian rocks on the continent of Europe, as, for example, in Scandinavia, and in the Ural Mountains, where, according to Murchison, “ by following its masses upon their strike, we are assured that the same zone which in one tract has a mechanical aspect and is fossiliferous, graduates in another parallel of latitude into a metam orphic crystalline condition, whereby not only the organic remains, but even the original impress of sedimentary origin are to a great degree obliterated.” The same kind of phenomena are common in Canada and the United States ; and Medlicott and Blanford, in ‘ The Geology of India,’ have described the thorough metamor¬ phism of Lower Silurian strata into gneiss and syenitic and hornblende schists. In Britain, none of the Upper Silurian rocks have undergone any serious change beyond that of ordinary consolidation, but in the Eastern Alps at Gratz, Sir Roderick Murchison has described both Upper Silurian and Devonian strata interstratified with separate courses of metamorphic chloritic schist. Enough has now been said to prove the frequent occurrence of metamorphic action among Cambrian and and Lower and Upper Silurian strata. If we now turn to the Devonian and Old Red Sandstone strata of England and Scotland, we find that metamorphic action lias also been at work, but in a much smaller degree. In Cornwall and Devon, five great bosses of granite stand out amid the stratified Silurian, Devonian, and Carboniferous formations. Adjoining or near these bosses the late Sir Henry De la Beche remarks, that “ in numerous localities we find the coarser slates converted into rocks resembling mica-slate and gneiss, a fact particularly well exhibited in the neighbourhood of Meavy, on the south-east of Tavistock,” and “ near Camelford we observed a fine arenaceous and micaceous grauwacke turned into a rock resembling mica- slate near the granite.” Other cases are given by the same author, of slaty strata turned into mica-schist and gneiss in rocks now generally considered to be of Devonian age. The Devonian rocks and Old Red Sandstone are of the same geological age, though they were deposited under different conditions, the first being of marine, and the latter of fresh-water, origin. The Old Red Sandstone of Wales, England, and Scotland, has not, as far as I know, suffered any metamorphism, excepting in one case in the north-east of Ayrshire, near the sources of the Avon Water, where a large boss of granite rises through the sandstone, which all round has been rendered crystalline with well-developed crystals of felspar. On the continent of Europe, a broad area of Devonian strata lies on both banks of the Rhine and the Moselle. Forty years ago, Sedgwick and Murchison described the crystalline quartzites, chlorite, and micaceous slates of the Hundsruck and the Taunus and, from personal observa¬ tion I know that the rocks in the country on either side of the Moselle are, in places, of a foliated or semi-foliated metamorphic character. In the Alps also, as already noticed, metamorphic Devonian strata occur interstratifiec with beds of metamorphic schists, and, Sir Roderick adds, “ we have ample data to affirm, that large portions of the Eastern Alps . . . are occupied by rocks of true Palaeozoic age, which in many parts.have passed into $ a crystalline state.” I know of no case in Britain where the Carboniferous strata have been thoroughly metamorphosed, excepting that in South Wales, beds of coal, in the west of Car¬ marthenshire and in South Pembrokeshire, gradually pass from so-called bituminous coal into anthracite. The I same is the case in the United States, in both instances the Carboniferous strata being exceedingly disturbed and contorted. In the Alps, however, Sir Roderick Murchison seems to have believed that Carboniferous rocks may have been metamorphosed: a circumstance since undoubtedly proved by the occurrence of a coal- measure calamite, well preserved, but otherwise partaking of the thoroughly crystalline character of the gneiss in which it is imbedded, and which was shown to me by the late Professor Gastaldi, at Turin. I am well acquainted with all the Permian strata of the British Islands and of various parts of continental Europe, and nowhere, that I have seen, have they suffered from metamorphic action, and strata of this age are, I believe, as yet unknown in the Alps. This closes the list of metamorphism of palaeozoic strata. I will not attempt (they are so numerous) to mention all the regions of the world in which Mesozoic or Secondary formations have undergone metamorphic action. In Britain and the non-mountainous parts of France, they are generally quite unaltered, but in the Alps it is different. There as everyone knows who is familiar with that region, the crystalline rocks in the middle of the chain have the same general strike as the various flanking stratified formations. As expressed by Murchison, “as we follow the chain from N.E. to S.W. we pass from the clearest types of sedimentary rocks, and, at length, in the Savoy Alps, are immersed in the highly altered mountains of Secondary limestone,” while, “ the metamorphism of the rocks is greatest as we approach the centre of the chain,” and indeed, anyone familiar with the Alps of Switzerland and Savoy knows that a process of metamorphism has been undergone by all the Jurassic rocks (Lias and Oolites) of the great mountain chain. Whether or not any strata of Neocomian and Cretaceous age have been well metamorphosed in this region I am unable to say ; but it seems to be certain ; that the Eocene or Lower Tertiary Alpine formation, ; known as the Flysch, contains beds of black schists which pass into Lydian stone, and also that in the Grisons it has been converted into gneiss and mica-schist, a fact mentioned by Studer and Murchison. I also have seen in the country north of the Oldenhorn, nummulitic rocks so far foliated that they formed an imperfect gneiss. In Tierra del Fuego, as described by Darwin, clay slates of early Cretaceous date pass into gneiss and mica- slate with garnets, and in Chonos Islands, and all along the great Cordillera of the Andes of Chili, rocks of Cretaceous or Cretaceo-oolitic age have been metamor¬ phosed into foliated mica-slate and gneiss, accompanied by the presence of granite, syenite, and greenstone. This ends my list, for I have never seen or heard of metamorphic rocks of later date than those that belong to the Eocene series. Enough, however, has been said to prove, that from the Laurentian epoch onward, the phenomenon of extreme metamorphism of strata has been of frequent recurrence all through Palaeozoic and Mesozoic times, and extends even to a part of the Eocene series equivalent to the soft unaltered strata of the formations of the London and Paris basins, which except¬ ing for their fossil contents, and sometimes highly in¬ clined positions, look as if they had only been recently deposited. [To be continued.) Communications, Letters, etc. have been received from Messrs, Brady, Boutell, Wilford, Miller, Clark, Matthias, Alcock, Beaven, Battie, Hanbury, 374, H. O. I., T. C. A., S. H. £\, J. O., Sheffield, Civis, Anteros, Eblana, Saxon. September 4, 1880.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 189 ASHY INGREDIENTS IN LIGHT COLOURED COD LIVER OIL. BY PROFESSOR E. A. VAN DER BURG. In the first part of the ‘ Scheikunolige Onderzuc- kingen,’ by G. J. Mulder, Dr. L. J. de Jongh says, on page 479 of his ‘ Chemical Investigation of the Composition of Cod Liver Oil’: — “No less differ the series of inorganic ingredients which we have discovered in cod liver oil from those men¬ tioned by others.” Further on, on page 480, line i 10:— “The reason why Harder, who, to our knowledge, has been up to the present time the only one that makes special mention of the inorganic ingredients of the cod liver oil, has found no phosphoric acid, is that he has not tried to find it. In declaring this, viz., the reasons why the results of our investigations on this point differ from those of others, we believe we have done no more than our duty. If we now look on the different results of our own investigations of the three sorts of cod liver oil we may state that the light-coloured oils contain more inorganic ingredients than the dark coloured. ” Dr. de Jongh also tells us that his investigations led him to the discovery that in the former the quantity of phosphoric acid is nearly double and that of lime more than double what is found in the latter. Considering that hardly any incombustible matter is found in the light-coloured oil, it may be of importance to know now Dr. de Jongh got those figures. To determine the phosphoric acid and the sul- | phuric acid a certain quantity of the oil was ;* saponified by the admixture of potassa caustica. The soap which was obtained in this way was decom¬ posed with hydrochloric acid. After the removal of the fatty acids the phosphoric acid in the filtered liquor was determined as phosphas ferricus, and the sulphuric acid as sulphas barycus. In order to see how much calcium, magnesia and soda the mixture contained a certain quantity of it was carbonized, the carbon digested with hydrochloric acid, and the phosphoric acid removed from the acid liquor as phosphas ferri. After filtration the calcium was determined as oxalas calcis, and after this had been removed the magnesia was precipitated as phosphas ammonico-magnesicus. The filtrate was now mixed with sulphuric acid, evaporated in a platinum cup, incinerated and weighed, and as no potash was found the weight was taken account of as sulphas sodae. In this manner the author found in light-coloured cod liver oil the follow percentages. 0-09135 Phosphoric acid 0-07100 Sulphuric acid 0-15150 Lime 0-00880 Magnesia 0"05540 Soda Total 0-37805 per cent, inorganic matter or 0-32265 per cent, incombustible ingredi¬ ents, if the soda, which may be volatilized as chloric natrium, is not counted. What was, however, the result of a direct experi¬ ment, the burning in a platinum cup ? Nothing more or less than this : — a quantity of no less than 35 . grams of light-coloured cod liver oil left no weighable quantity of ash. Third Series, No. 532. These experiments have often been made with the light coloured Lofodin cod liver oil of Draisma Van Valkenburg, and generally crowned with the same success. Likewise other sorts of cod liver oil produced the same results. For instance, 23*867 grams of an English oil, that was very pure, left 0-0005 gram of a light brown ash, in which iron, but hardly any calcium, could be distinguished ; accordingly 0002 per cent. 22"408 grams of Dr. de Jongh’s oil, which is darker than the two sorts mentioned above, left 0-002 gram of ash, in which iron and calcium were distinguish¬ able ; accordingly 0"009 per cent. Hence it may be safely stated that light coloured cod liver oil contains hardly any or no incombustible matter. How then are the results of Dr. de Jongli’s experi¬ ments to be accounted for ? Inasmuch as this phos¬ phoric acid, calcium, etc., have really been found in an analysis, they can only have originated from the vessels or the reagents that were used, a warning example, no doubt, that one cannot be too scrupu¬ lously accurate in ascertaining the rectitude of the results that one has acquired through analysis. ANALYSIS OF IODINE-IRON COD LIVER OIL.* BY PROFESSOR E. A. VAN DER BURG. From the above it is evident that the light coloured cod liver oil after combustion leaves no weighable quantity of ash. The quantity of iron may be found by burning at least 20 grams in a small porcelain or platinum cup, and weighing the iron oxide that is in that way produced. This weight multiplied by 0"7 gives the quantity of iron in the oil. If the oil Is of the right kind there should be 0 ‘27 per cent, of iron. One has to be very careful in burning the oil, as it is very combustible, and the experiment con¬ sequently liable to fail. The vessel — I always use one of platinum — should be filled for no more than one-sixth. It should be heated by a gas flame under the chimney. The oil will be observed to lose the violet colour and become brownish- red. As soon as the colour of the oil has changed in this way, there will be a sufficient quan¬ tity of combustible vapour, that may be ignited by a flame, and will keep burning for some time. At that moment the gas flame should be removed, and the combustion, that heretofore took place in a very great flame, will keep on quietly. As soon as the flame is extinguished, the vessel should be heated anew, and again some inflammable vapours will appear. When the oil is completely carbonized, a beginning should be made with a total combustion of the carbon. This last process may be quickened a good deal, if every now and then a drop of water is poured on the cooled carbon, and after a slow and careful evaporation of the water the carbon is ignited afresh. The red ash may be determined as pure iron oxide. Should further proof be wanted, the ash may be dissolved in hydrochloric acid, reduced by zinc, after which the iron may be easily determined by the ordinary titrated solution of potassium permanganate. To find out the iodine 5 grams of the oil is sulfi- cient. This should be saponified with an alcoholic solution of potash (which must contain no iodine, oi course), by heating it for an hour or two, in a porce - # The method of making tliia preparation will be de- eci ibed in the next number of this J ournal. 190 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [September 4, 1880. lain cup, on a water-bath. After this the soap must be completely carbonized in the same cup by careful heating, and the carbon treated with water, until it ceases to have an alkaline reaction. As a test that the combustion has taken place in the right manner the solution must be totally colourless. The clear liquid must be rendered a little acid by admixture of hydrochloric acid and precipitated by a solution of palladium. The precipitate may be weighed now, or as palladium metal, after heating. If the pre¬ paration has been of the right composition, 5 grams will produce about 0*087 gram of iodetum palla- diosum, or about 0*025 of palladium. DETECTION AND DETERMINATION OF HEAVY MINERAL OILS, OF RESIN OILS, OF THE FATTY OILS, AND OF RESIN IN THE OILS OF COM¬ MERCE.* BY M. A. EkMONT. The qualitative analysis ought to be preceded by an ex¬ amination of the organoleptic properties of the oil, the manner in which it behaves under the influence of heat, and of its specific gravity, which often gives useful indica¬ tions. Thus, if the specific gravity of the sample is below 0*900 it certainly contains a mineral oil ; if from 0*900 to 0*975, we may be in presence of the most complex mix¬ tures; but if it is above 0*975 we have certainly an oil of resin. We begin by treating the sample with carbon disul¬ phide, freshly prepared, which gives a clear solution with all the oils. If oleic acid or a fattj oil has been mixed with alkali to raise its specific gravity by the formation of a portion of soap, there will appear a precipitate. In this case the liquid is filtered, and the residue is washed with carbon disulphide. It may be proved to be soap by its solubility in water, its alkalinity, and the turbidity, more or less marked, which is caused by an acid poured into the solution. The filtrate is freed from the carbon disulphide by dis¬ tillation : 1 c.c. of the residue is taken and mixed with 4 c.c. of alcohol at 85°. If solution takes place fatty acids are present, pure or mixed, and an excess of alcohol is gradually added. If after having poured in 50 c.c. the liquid is limpid, or there is produced a very slight cloud, which disappears on adding a drop of hydrochloric acid, the sample consists of oleic acid, pure or mixed with resin. If the specific gravity does not exceed 0*905 at 15° the sample consists entirely of oleic acid. If the specific gra¬ vity is higher the oleic acid contains resin. By way of confirmation the substance is examined with the polari- meter, either directly or dissolved in carbon disulphide, and if there is a deviation we may be certain of the pre¬ sence of a resinous mixture. If we find a persistent cloudiness in the alcoholic solu¬ tion it is because the fatty acids contain an oil sparingly soluble in this solvent, and in so much the greater quan¬ tity as the cloud appears earlier. This very sensitive pro¬ cess renders it possible to detect 2 or 3 per cent, of heavy mineral oil, or of resin, or fatty oil in the oleic acid known in commerce as oleine. The turbidity produced in the alcoholic liquid resolves itself in some time into little oily drops, which line the sides of the vessel, and which can be made by a shock to fall to the bottom of the tube. The volume of this residue shows approximately the proportion of insoluble matter. The most common case is when 4 parts of alcohol do not completely dissolve 1 part of oil. A larger quantity of the latter is then taken, and agitated with an equal volume of alcohol. After settling for a time the alcoholic solution is decanted and evaporated in a capsule. The nature and the quantity of the residue serve as a clue to the nature of the mixture. *Bullctin de la Society Chimique de Paris. Reprinted from the Chemical News, July 23, 1880. I submit the oil to the action of caustic soda, employing the method indicated by M. Dalican for the analysis of tallows. In a capsule of porcelain, or preferably of enamelled cast iron, there are weighed about 20 grms. of oil, and heated to 100° to 110°. There is then poured in a mixture of 15 c.c. soda-lye at 36° B. and 10 c.c. of alcohol : the mixture is stirred and heated until the alco¬ hol and the chief part of the water have disappeared. Then 150 c.c. of distilled water are added, and the boiling is kept up for half an hour, when three cases may occur : — 1. The oil, under the influence of the alkali, is merely emulsified, and on the addition of water it separates dis¬ tinctly : this indicates either a mineral oil, a resin oil, or a mixture of the two. The aqueous solution is decanted off, and it is mixed with sulphuric acid. If there is no precipi- ate, or if a mere slight cloudiness is produced, the sample is a pure mineral oil. If there is a considerable precipitate which collects in brown viscid drops giving off a strong odour of resin, and soluble in an excess of alcohol, we have a resin oil, pure or mixed. The oil is examined with the polarimeter, and if it acts upon polarized light this is a confirmation of the presence of resin oil. If the specific gravity is below 0*960 there is probably a mixture of mineral oil. Good indications may also be got by distilling if one of the oils is not in too trifling proportion. The dis¬ tillation ought to be fractionated as far as possible and conducted slowly. As the resin oils boil, as a rule, at lower points than the mineral oils, it follows that in place of having specific gravities which increase with the boiling-points, as happens with the heavy mineral oils or pure resin oils, there are observed, with their mixtures, very abrupt transitions. The sample ought to be tested with stannic chloride, and if the violet coloration is not very distinct the same reagent should be applied to the first products of distillation, since the colourable product contained in the resin oils is there chiefly met with. 2. Or there is formed by the action of caustic soda a paste-like mass of soap, which on treatment with wTater and boiling for some time gives a clear liquid. It is diluted with cold water and then supersaturated with an acid. The fatty acids liberated collect on the surface after de¬ cantation of the water, and if exposed to cold they crys¬ tallize. A small portion is melted in a tube at a gentle temperature, and 4 parts of alcohol at 85° are added first and afterwards an excess. Here two cases are possible : — a. If no precipitation takes place it is because the fatty acids are pure, which shows that the oil examined is a pure fatty oil, or, which rarely happens, mixed with resin. The specific gravity of the fatty acids may here give good indications, but it cannot be taken at common tempera¬ tures, at which fatty acids are solid. They must be melted, and the specific gravity taken at a known tem¬ perature. M. Baudouin, Chemist at the Arnavon Soap Works, at Marseilles, has drawn up a table of the specific gravities of the fatty acids of certain oils taken at 30°. Except those of linseed oil, which mark 0*910, those of the other fatty oils have specific gravaties ranging from 0*892 to 0*900. To reduce the specific gravities of the fatty oils examined to the temperature of 30°, deduct from the density found, calculated on a litre, as many times 0*64 grm. as there are degrees below, or, if the temperature is higher, add to the density found as many times as 0*64 grin, as there are degrees above. If the specific gravity indicates that the neutral oil contains resin an attempt may be made to separate it, in part at least, rapidly by agitating 5 or 6 c.c. of the original oil with an equal volume of alcohol, decanting after settling, and evaporating in a capsule. There is thus obtained a solid or semi-fluid residue in case of resin. Further examination is then made with the polarimeter. b. The fatty acids derived from the decomposition of the soap give a precipitate if treated with an excess of alcohol. If it is not redissolved by 1 grm. of hydrochloric acid, and if after some time it is resolved into oily drops it is due to a mineral oil or a resin oil. A fatty oil containing 10 to 15 per cent of one these oils is completely saponi- September 4, 1880.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 19 L fied, and yields with boiling water not an emulsion, but a soap completely soluble. The turbidity should resolve it¬ self into oily drops, for there are certain fatty acids — those, amongst others, of the oil of earth-nuts ( arachis ) — which are soluble in a small proportion of alcohol at 85°, but an excess of the alcohol precipitates a sparingly soluble por¬ tion, arachidic acid, in small flocks. These flocks may be collected on a filter, and examined as to their complete solubility in alkalies. If their melting-point is near 73° they may be attributed to the oil of earth-nuts. 3. Or, lastly, the oil, on treatment with soda, may give a paste more or less firm, which if placed in boiling water for half an hour allows oily drops to rise to the surface, which are due to a mineral oil or a resin oil. After settling for some minutes a part of the supernatant liquid is de¬ canted and mixed with an excess of a saturated solution of common salt. There is produced a precipitate of soap, which is filtered off on cooling. The filtrate is super¬ saturated with an acid. If there is produced a slight tur¬ bidity, and if the liquid which was almost colourless when alkaline gives off an odour of fatty matters we have a neu¬ tral oil mixed with a non-saponifiable oil. If, on the con¬ trary, the solution was highly coloured after filtration, and gives when acidified a flocculent precipitate of a resinous odour, the sample is a mixture containing resin. In these two cases, the components of the mixture may be recog¬ nized by means of the procedures indicated above. Quantitative Analysis. — If it is desired to know the elements attacked by alkalies, and of those which are not, the following procedure is to be followed If the sample has yielded anything insoluble in carbon disulphide, it is separated as already said, and the operation is confined to the residue of the distillation. Let it be assumed that the composition of the residue is as complex as possible, con¬ taining fatty oils, mineral oils, resin oils, and solid resin. The mixture is saponified. Into a flask closed by stopper, through which passes a long tube, are introduced 20 grms. of the oil, and a mixture of 15 c.c. of soda at 36° B., and 15 c.c. of 90 to 95 per cent, alcohol. The flask is then set upon the water-bath for half an hour and is often shaken. At the end of this time the whole is poured into a funnel fitted with a tap and previously warmed, which is left in a stove at 50° to 60° until a complete separation of the non-saponifiable oil from the alkaline liquid has taken place. The latter is then decanted into a porcelain capsule, and in its stead is poured 15 c.c. of boiling water which has served to rinse the flask. It is shaken well so as to wash the non-saponifiable matter, and decanted anew after settling. Finally, it is washed a third time with boiling water. The oil in the funnel is received into a tared capsule and weighed. As for what adheres to the sides, it is washed with a little ether, and the solution is received in another capsule, which is ex¬ posed to the air till the bulk of the ether has disappeared. It is then gently heated to expel the rest, and weighed. The alkaline liquid is kept at a boil for some time to expel the alcohol, and after cooling it is mixed with an equal volume of a saturated solution of common salt, freed from magnesia by being boiled for a few moments with caustic soda and filtered. In this manner, the soap is pre¬ cipitated in firm clots, carrying with it the last portion of non-saponifiable matter. The saline solution, after settling, is decanted by means of a pipette and neutralized with an acid. If a notable turbidity is produced, which collects in flocks, it is due to resin. The flocks are collected, dried, and weighed. The clots of soap are thrown upon a filter, washed twice with salt water, the last traces of which are removed by pressing the mass between blotting paper. The soap is then placed in a glass cylinder, moistened vvith about 100 c.c. of carbon disulphide recently rectified, stoppered, gently shaken at intervals three or four times, so as not to break the clots, and left to settle. After an hour or two the carbon sulphide which is coloured yellow by the dissolved oil, separates in the lower part of the cylinder. It is decanted by means of a pipette, and in its stead is added a fresh portion of the solvent. It is shaken, left to settle, decanted, and so on till the carbon sulphide runs off almost colourless. The whole is then thrown upon a filter and washed for the last time. A portion of this last washing, if evaporated upon a watch-glass, should leave an insignificant residue. The soap on the filter is exposed to the air till the carbon disulphide with which it is saturated has escaped. As for the carbon disulphide solution, it is distilled gently on the water-bath. The last portions of the solvent are expelled by blowing air into the flask while placed in boiling water. When cold it is weighed. The last portion of the non-saponifiable matter thus obtained ought to have the same appearance as the first portion. If it is less fluid it still contains a portion of soap. In this case it is again taken up in carbon disulphide at a gentle heat in presence of a few drops of water to hydrate the soap which, without this addition, would again be partially dissolved. It is then filtered and the washed soap is added to the chief mass. The non-saponifiable oil may consist of mineral oil, resin oil, ora mixture of both. The means of detection have been given above, and I have not yet come upon a process for their separation. The soap insoluble in carbon sulphide which lies on the filter contains resin and fatty acids combined with soda. The separation of these substances, so similar in their properties, presents many difficulties. Several methods have been published, but none of them gives satisfactory results. That of M. Jean, one of the most recent, consists in exhausting the barium soap with ether, which ought to dissolve the resinate and leave the soaps of the fatty acids untouched. On following exactly the author’s instructions, I have never been able to avoid the partial solution of the barium oleate. I have modified the process by substituting for the ether boiling alcohol of 85 per cent, which certainly dissolves much less of the oleate, but still takes up enough to render the results inaccurate. As far as possible the soap is separated from the filter and placed in a capsule. The filter is put back in the funnel and filled with boiling water. The solution is effected slowly and filters by degrees ; it is received in the capsule where the detached portion has been already placed. The solution of soap, after cooling, is mixed with caustic soda until precipitation no longer ensues, and left to settle. All the soap of the fatty acids is deposited, drawing down with it the chief portion of the resinate, a part of which, however, remains in solution and colours the liquid strongly. The whole is filtered, the filtrate accurately neutralized with sulphuric acid ; the flocks of resin deposited are received upon a tared filter which is weighed anew after washing in water and drying at a low temperature. The soap is redissolved in a little luke-warm water and an excess of barium chloride is poured into the solution with agitation. The clots of barytic soap are drained in a filter- pump, replaced in the capsule in which the precipitation has been effected and thoroughly dried in the water-bath or the stove. The mass is then powdered, and treated with 50 or 60 c.c. of alcohol at 85 per cent, which is kept near the boiling point, working it up with a pestle. It is left to settle for a few moments and the supernatant alcoholic liquid is then decanted into a phial. 20 to 25 c.c. of alcohol are again poured upon the residue, let boil, de¬ canted after settling, and so on till a portion of the alkali which has been used leaves, on evaporation, scarcely any residue, which happens generally after 120 c.c. of alcohol have been used. The alcoholic liquids are mixed and distilled till there remains only about 50 c.c. Hydrochloric acid is added to decompose the resinate, and the resin set at liberty floats in the liquids. On cooling it collects in a solid mass at the bottom of the vessel. It is thrown into a capsule, melted under water, and weighed after desiccation on the water-bath. The residue insoluble in alcohol is treated in a similar manner to obtain the fatty acids. 192 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [September 4, 1880. EUPATORIUM PERFOLIATUM.* BY GEOKGE LATIN, PH.G. Eupatorium perfoliatum has been analysed by Peterson (1851) and Bicldey (1854) ; but, as they found nothing but the usual constituents of herbs, the writer thought it would be of some importance to make still further in¬ vestigations. The leaves and tops of the plant, reduced to a mode¬ rately fine powder, and packed in a percolator, were treated with 95 per cent, alcohol until exhausted. The alcohol was distilled off and the residue evaporated to the consistence of an extract by a very gentle heat. This extract was then treated with ether, which dissolved out the bitter principle and colouring matter, leaving a greyish, gummy -like mass, entirely soluble in water, and proved, by Trommer’s test, to be sugar. The ethereal tincture was then placed in a flask, and the ether carefully distilled off by means of a water-bath, and evaporated to a semi-solid consistence, which was then treated with petroleum benzin, by means of which a large amount of colouring matter, fat, etc., was re¬ moved. The benzin solution, upon being permitted to evaporate spontaneously, yielded a number of small crys¬ tals in an impure condition, which adhered to the sides of the vessel. The>e were washed very rapidly with petroleum benzin and then with ether, which left them in the form of pure white, needle-shaped, tasteless crystals, and were insoluble in alcohol, ether, water and alkaliue solutions. When treated with sulphuric and nitric acids separately no change was produced, but subjected first to the action of nitric and then of sulphuric acid, a beautiful carmine-red was produced, changing after a short time to an orange yellow ; with hydrochloric acid a beautiful emerald-green, and with potassium bichro¬ mate with sulphuric acid a greenish- violet was developed. Heated to redness on platintnn foil, no residue is left and no odour given off. The crystals have a comparatively low fusing point ; on placing a few of them on a piece of note-paper and holding them over the flame of a Bunsen burner, they melt, leaving a greasy stain, but not suffi¬ ciently strong to render the paper transparent. This being, so far as the writer is aware, the first crystalline principle obtained from Eupcitorium perfo¬ liatum, it was a difficult matter to decide exactly what was the nature of the crystals, as the quantity was very small ; but, so far as examination enabled me to form an opinion, I judged them to be either wax or resin. The residue left after treating with benzin was then dissolved in alcohol and filtered. Upon the filter there was left a black powder, which was unaffected by alcohol, water, alkalies and concentrated acids, and when heated was consumed, leaving an ashy residue. The filtrate was then treated with an alcoholic solution of acetate of lead, which caused a copious precipitate of colouring matter ; this was separated by second filtration and the liquid treated with sulphuretted hydrogen (H2S), by which the lead was eliminated. The liquid being boiled, was thus freed from sulphuretted hydrogen. After this, purified animal charcoal was left in contact with it for three days, the whole being shaken occasionally. By this means the solution was nearly deprived of colour ; it was then concentrated and treated with boiling water until all bitterness was removed, and the residue was a resinous, tasteless mass. The aqueous solution thus obtained was again evapo¬ rated and treated with chloroform, which dissolved out a bitter principle and left a tasteless, resin-like mass in the vessel. The chloroformic solution, when evaporated, left the bitter principle in a pure condition, and this was named eupatorine. When tested by Trommer’s test it gave no reaction, but when first boiled with sulphuric acid it gives a red-coloured precipitate, and by sulphuric acid * From the American Journal of Pharmacy , August, 1880. alone a white precipitate was occasioned, showing it to be a glucoside. Eupatorine has a little acid taste, and is soluble in alcohol, chloroform, ether, boiling water and concentrated acids ; with sulphuric [icid a dark reddish-brown colour is pro¬ duced, and with hydrochloric and nitric acids a light yellow colour results. Eupatorine, when pure, is wholly dissipated by heat, and when boiled with sulphuric acid and water the odour of raspberries is given off. Aqueous Percolate. — After the herb was treated with alcohol it was exhausted with water and the solution evaporated to the consistence of an extract, having an astringent taste, and giving the following reactions : — With ferric chloride, a dark green colour was produced ; with solution of gelatin, a light brown precipitate was formed, and by placing this in a filter and washing it with cold water several times ferric chloride gave a dark colour to that part of the filter that had been in contact with the precipitate, proving the presence of tannin ; with tartar emetic, no precipitate. Alcohol gave a pre¬ cipitate of gum from an aqueous solution. 5 grams of the herb, when exhausted with sulphuric ether, upon evaporating yielded an extract weighing 54 centigrams, having no bitter taste, and nearly all soluble in benzin, supposed to be colouring matter. A small quantity of volatile oil was obtained by distilling the herb with water, having the disagreeable odour of boiled cabbage. 5 grams of the herb lose 37 centigrams of moisture when heated to dryness. The chemical constituents of the herb are as follows : — Eupatorine, (a glucoside), a crystallizable body, a vola¬ tile oil, gum, tannic acid, sugar. THE CONDITIONS NECESSARY TO SUCCESSFULLY CONDUCT PERCOLATION.* BY J. U. LLOYt>, CINCINNATI, OHIO. A reply to this query may at first sight appear easy. On the contrary, the natural laws to be considered, and the various causes dependent upon manipulation that are continually influencing the process, render the subject complicated. Beyond doubt, however, all the discrepancies which manipulators meet in result of work from time to time, and the recorded variations of different operators, are due to causes that may be understood and overcome to a very great extent. Natural laws govern the process of percolation, and to carry on our work so as to make the most judicious application of these laws to the object in view should be the desire of the manipulator. Perco¬ lation, as connected with the work of the pharmacist, has of late years become very important. Few appreciate the very great amount of medicine prepared in this manner, and I think it may truly be said that this very interesting part of the business of the pharmacist is over¬ looked in many instances where money might be saved and leisure time employed. It is not perhaps altogether the fault of our druggists that the subject is neglected, for to a degree the impres¬ sion has gradually extended that such articles even as the simple fluid extracts of the Pharmacopoeia may be pre¬ pared upon a large scale better than in the small amounts required by dispensing pharmacists. Be this latter point true or not, to a very great degree the “manufacture” of fluid extracts has passed into the hands of large houses. Another reason, perhaps, for neglect of this branch of the apothecary’s business, is the fact that some doubt has arisen as to the comparative values of extracts made by the officinal process and such modifications as have been recommended. And yet I know that our pharmacists are hard workers, and judging from acquaintances little fear need be entertained that dread of trouble will make * Read before the American Pharmaceutical Association. September 4, 1880.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 193 the pharmacists of our country shrink from the adoption by the revising committee of the United States Pharma¬ copoeia of any practical process for the preparation of fluid extracts, however complicated such process may be. I believe if the apothecary purchases fluid extracts that may easily be made by himself it is in the majority of cases from the above-named considerations. Few that witness the constant application of our druggists to busi¬ ness, from early morning until late at night, will disagree upon this point. It is desired that the result of the investigations, tabulated in the paper to follow, may assist in throwing a little light upon some of the points we have mentioned, and others that are obscure. In many instances old ground is undoubtedly traversed, but it was deemed best to follow the chain of argument, regardless of former investigations. Let it be remembered that these arguments are brought forward and experiments insti¬ tuted with the object of study in actual laboratory management, and not for the purpose of upholding preconceived opinions. It may be fouud that some of the points are poorly taken, and others are supported by experiments in which natural laws that exert a very great influence upon the result are overlooked. If such be the case corrections will be thankfully accepted. It is to be hoped that those who criticize will bring forward experiments that will enable comparisons to be made, or at least will designate the points that appear defective. It is also requested that criticisms be confined to the points mentioned in this paper under like conditions only, as no others can be of value. It will be noticed that the experiments brought forward are upon a scale that will enable repetition by every retail pharmacist of the country. Others could have been tabulated, perhaps to advantage, but it is thought a sufficient number are given, and it is hoped that those who think otherwise may be interested, and induced to go over portions of the work while preparing fluid extracts during the year to come. The opportunity is embraced to especially thank Mr. Charles Mohr for his careful review of the manuscript, and to acknowledge the justice of the majority of his arguments where issue was taken, as that gentleman will notice when enabled to peruse the present paper ; also to Professor John M. Crawford for a careful review of the mathematical expressions used in the first portions of the paper. Lastly, it is to be remembered that the writer is looking at this subject with his present light, and deems it a duty to reconsider any point when convinced of error, but claims the privilege to maintain his belief, Sunless so convinced, whoever may be the dissenter. One of the most frequent operations to be performed by the pharmacist is to separate from the crude materials, offered principally by the vegetable kingdom, active principles from others inert or not desirable. This object is reached by bringing the same into the liquid state by solution, with the aid of a proper solvent E (menstruum). Thus we have the process of maceration and percolation, the latter being a modification of the former, calling in the aid of gravitation. To arrive at a proper understanding of the laws which govern the solu¬ tion of substances, that is the transfer of a solid into the liquid state through the aid of solvents, we should consider first the greatest agent in percolation, — the attraction of gravitation. This unknown force impels all terrestrial bodies toward a common centre, the centre of the earth. If we arrest the fall of a solid and pour upon it a liquid, that liquid will flow" over the solid, excepting a small amount held by adhesion, and will fall from the lower surface towards the earth. If that solid be im¬ penetrable, and insoluble in the liquid, it will remain intact; if soluble, it will gradually assume the liquid state and disappear. If the solid be porous the liquid will enter. This is due to absorption — a molecular force, which is working independent of the attraction of gravi¬ tation, and overcoming it to a limited degree, thereby exercising a great influence over the process of solution, beneficial inasmuch as it insures a closer and more con¬ tinued contact between the solvent and the solid. Thus, if a certain amount of liquid be slowly poured upon the porous body, we shall find that attraction of gravitation will fail to detach the liquid from the lower side ; it does not flow over the outside but enters, is absorbed, and held within its substance. The attraction of gravitation still exerts itself, for the actual weight of the mass is the sum of the separate weights of the two bodies. Without further examination we might suppose the materials at rest ; such, however, is not the case. There are dis¬ turbing elements which produce constant motion; thus, an alteration of temperature will excite a change in the relative position of the molecules of the liquid, and tem¬ perature constantly changes. But besides the motions of the molecules, caused by the constantly varying changes of temperature, there is osmosis, an attraction that in¬ duces currents of liquid through cellular tissue. Gravity, however, overcomes at first all of these various contrary influences —among which we may class diffusion — and is ever tending to draw the liquid most heavily charged with soluble matters downward through the lighter, and thus there seems to be no rest, but, on the contrary, con¬ tinual change. The influences mentioned exert themselves whether the solid be large or small, whether a single particle of dust in a quantity of liquid or an innumerable number placed in a mass and covered with liquid. Let us turn our attention to solution. Throwing aside all theories as to the why and wherefore of the change of state from solid to fluid, we must accept the fact, that below the melting temperature certain solids will, to a fixed extent, assume the form of liquids if in contact with particular fluids. The conditions necessary to effect and promote this change are: surface exposed to the dissolving medium, circulation of the liquid, temperature and time of contact between the surfaces of solid and the liquid. In regard to the first of these conditions, it is invariably found that the rapidity of solution increases with the area of the surface exposed; thus, for an example, if a cubic crystal of bromide of potassium, or any other substance, one inch in dimension, be surrounded with water, the surface in contact with the water will be 6 square inches. If the crystal be bisected by a plane parallel to any two of its sides, the amount of the material remains the same, but its surface has been increased 2 square inches. Let each half now be divided into four equal parts, and there will be a total of 12 square inches of surface, exactly twice the amount of the original cube. Division can be theoretically, and in the above instance according to mathematical laws, continued to the extent of our imagination, and each cube divided into eight will double the amount of the surface. But in practice we meet with obstacles of various nature which soon interpose insurmountable limits to accurate divisions, making our further efforts in that direction impracticable, and the desired increase of surface is most readily effected by pulverizing the solid, thus obtaining irregular surfaces. In considering the rest of the conditions upon which solution depends we next observe the action of currents. Thus immerse a cubical crystal of bromide of potas¬ sium 1 inch in dimension in water, and its 6 square inches of surface will be in contact with 6 square inches of water surface ; immediately the two surfaces act together, resulting in the disintegration of the surface of & the salt, which assumes the liquid form and blends with the surface of the water in the most intimate manner. This change takes place to a fixed extent, dependent upon the temperature and the saturation of the solvent. If the crystal be at the bottom of a vessel of water it commences most rapidly to diminish in size from the top until finally it disappears. In observing closely the process we notice streams of liquid circulating about the crystal. These currents, colourless and trans- 194 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [September 4, 18S0 parent like the surrounding medium, are clearly visible from the fact that they refract the rays of light differently, an optical result caused by the portions of liquids of different densities, for the particles which form the surfaces of the salt unite with those of the water surface, resulting in a compound that has a greater specific gravity than pure water, consequently, as soon as united, this fluid flows over the crystal and down its sides in obedience to the laws of gravitation. It strikes upon the bottom of the vessel and, in response to the law that fluids of different densities seek their own level, spreads out, and in doing so displaces its bulk of water, which rises and replaces the solution about the crystal, and thus continuous currents flow over and down the sides of the crystal, and fresher menstruum is constantly taking the place of that more saturated. We might liken the foregoing to a surface of liquid resolving against a solid, each movement of which wears away the solid and decreases the wearing force of the liquid. At last, if the amount of water be sufficient, the crystal will have disappeared, and at the bottom of the vessel will be found a dense solution at rest surmounted by a lighter one. Again cautiously introduce a crystal of the same salt and the afore -named phenomenon will take place, though in a less marked degree. The circulation of the medium becomes gradually less and less distinct, and finally, if the salt be in excess, disappears. There remains now a remnant of bromide of potassium sur¬ rounded by the dense solution, while overlying we find almost pure water. In obedience to what is generally considered another force, which, it is thought, produces the diffusion of liquids, the solution and overlaying water continually but slowly intermingle. At last they are homogeneous, preceding which, however, the remnant of crystal at the bottom of the vessel will have dis¬ appeared. The foregoing exemplifies the changes which take place, under like conditions, when the crystal is broken, excepting that the increased amount of surface contact, before considered, hastens the operation. Thus we find that nature’s laws constantly produce circulation while solution is progressing. Arguing therefrom we should be able to hasten the operation at certain stages and assist nature by frequently stirring the entire liquid, thus mixing the solutions. Recognizing the theoretical value of circulation and extent of surface, when we wish to dissolve substances we should powder them, and stir the liquids at short intervals. Temperature is most important. With a few excep¬ tions substances dissolve to a greater extent in warm than in cold liquids, and even though the material be scarcely more soluble in the hot menstruum it dissolves more rapidly. This results from the fact that liquids while rapidly changing temperature are in a more rapid state of circulation, and heat also decreases the cohesive attraction of solids, their molecules being more easily detached from the mass, and therefore more readily unite with those of the liquid. Few operators have failed to notice the benefit of a warm room when dissolving sub¬ stances. Careful manufacturers cannot allow the process of percolation to be conducted at winter temperature, even though so doing results in great saving of alcohol by lessening evaporation (see tables 1 and 2).* Time is a consideration of importance. An appreciable amount of contact must be allowed between solvent and solid. That solutions require time for action is a principle well recog¬ nized and scarcely necessary to mention. Having now briefly noticed the influences which govern solution, let us consider the relation between maceration and percolation, as these processes are called, bearing in mind the fact that the direct object is the solution of certain substances. Place 2 ounces of powdered buchu in a vessel and saturate thoroughly with alcohol. Then fit closely on the powder a sheet of blotting paper, and add alcohol so that the entire amount used is 16 fluid ounces ; then very carefully remove the paper so as not to disturb the powder. Now we shall have the principles of solution exemplified essactly as in the previous example, excepting instead of one crystal we have a number of very small fragments, and instead of a perfectly soluble material the substance is only partially soluble, and in addition to other forces we have capillary attraction. Solutions of different densities quickly form throughout the interstices of the powder. These solutions are in constant motion. They are subject to the forces before mentioned, but by the predominating influence of gravi¬ tation the constant tendency of the heaviest solutions is downward, and the densest part of the solution constantly seeks the lowest point (see table 3). Thus we have new surfaces presented between solvent and material, attended in the first place with a handing downward of the dis¬ solved matter. Apparently, the liquid and the powder are at rest; actually, there is constant motion, and so long as the act of solution progresses the circulation of the menstruum continues. However, these forces cannot extend their influence above the surface of the powder. It may be suggested here that diffusion can effect the mixture (see table 3). Consequently the liquid within the interstices of the powder may be strongly saturated with dissolved matters, while that just overlying is scarcely contaminated, and that near the surface of the vessel is for some time perfectly pure. Assuming now that we desire to transfer the dissolved matter equally to all portions of the liquid, we most easily accomplish the object by stirring the contents of the vessel until the menstruum above and the solution within are thoroughly incorporated. When allowed to rest solution as before proceeds, and when we again stir the contents of the vessel we transfer a certain proportion of dissolved matter to the overlying fluid. Each operation depletes the powder to an extent of soluble matters, and tends to produce an equilibrium between menstruum and material. The process of solution becomes gradually less active, and at last ceases to any perceptible degree, at which point we find the liquid above the powder and the liquid within identical. However long we may allow them to remain together, and however violently they may be agitated, we cannot further deplete the powder without increase of temperature. This is maceration, and thus it is we cannot by maceration represent the powder operated upon, for when the supernatant liquid is filtered from the powder soluble matters in proportion to the liquid within the powder must remain with it. As the liquid obtained is to the entire menstruum, so must the material in the liquid obtained be to the material dissolved by the entire menstruum. Other inconveniences attend the practical application of this mode of extracting the soluble substances from our plants. A very serious objection is the time re¬ quired — generally two weeks. This, perhaps, more than any other cause, interested pharmacists in a general endeavour to improve. Another desideratum was an increase of strength in the product. We will consider briefly a slight modification of this process of maceration. Let us carefully moisten 2 ounces of powdered buchu with alcohol, press firmly into a container, and cover with the same menstruum. The operation of solution will be repeated exactly as in the other example. At length the liquid within the powder, and that in the cavities between its particles will be identical. When this state arrives we remove the material to a press, and obtain all the liquid possible by pressure. The residuum material is again finely comminuted, macerated with fresh alcohol, and again submitted to pressure; the operation being repeated as many times as is considered necessary. It at first strikes us with reference to this process, that as we constantly remove saturated liquid from the powder, and substitute per- | fectly pure in its place, we must soon perfectly deplete * The tables will appear in a subsequent portion of the paper. — September 4, 18S0.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 195 the powder. But by any ordinary means we cannot remove all the liquid, and certainly that held within the powder must contain its full proportion of dissolved matters. Therefore, assuming that it required 4 ounces of alcohol, and the liquid within the powder and that between the particles had become identical in composi¬ tion, and 3 ounces of liquid were obtained (a liberal allowance), one-fourth of the strength must remain in the residuum ; consequently the 3 fluid ounces obtained containing three-fourths of the extractive matter repre¬ sent 1^ ounce of buchu, or | ounce of powder to each fluid ounce, and each of the following operations dilutes this. At each successive step the powder, preceding and following maceration and expression, contains the same amount °of liquid, and for every 4 ounces of alcohol applied, 4 ounces of solution are obtained, excepting loss by evaporation, which will not be considered here. Decrease in quantity of powder by having a portion of its extractive matter removed by each maceration is also disregarded. The second expressed liquid we find repre¬ sents but four-fifths of the extractive matters remaining in the powder, that is, four-fifths of one-fourth, which is one-fifth of the whole, or original quantity, which, added to the three-fourths obtained by the first, operation, make the sum of nineteen-twentieths contained in 7 fluid ounces of solution, a little less than three-twentieths to the fluid ounce. The first operation produced five- twentieths to the fluid ounce, therefore there is a reduc¬ tion of a little more than two-twentieths to the fluid ounce by the second maceration. Theoretically this procedure may be carried to infinity before, entirely exhausting the material (see table 4). Practically the exhaustion will not be as thorough as our example repre¬ sents. From considerations yet to be named, the writer believes it is impossible to obtain an expressed liquid con¬ taining substances of the plant capable of being dissolved by the menstruum, in the great proportion between suc¬ cessive percolates indicated by this ideal example. It is invariably found that a tenth maceration will produce an appreciable amount of extractive matter, and when we come to study the constituents of plants and their relations to menstruum, it will be doubtless accepted that such must be the case. As the matter stands, those that favour this process cannot well object to the argument and table, inasmuch as it admits of the greatest possible depletion of the powder. Others may, perhaps, with good cause, argue that theoretical propor¬ tion of soluble matter extracted will be less than the above upon the assumption that the menstruum and the inert portion of the powder are alike impregnated with soluble matter, and that the actual proportion should be between menstruum squeezed from the mixture and entire residuum. Table 5 will give this view of the case, using the same data for calculations employed for table 4. Another trouble attending this process in practice is the necessity of finely dividing or pulverizing each residue before remaceration, an operation tedious and difficult to accomplish in the majority of cases, especially when large amounts of material are worked. I have never succeeded to my satisfaction in a general way, without passing the residuum through a sieve, after each expression, an operation not easily accomplished, especially with substances which agglutinate, although in certain instances the process is preferable to any other. Our aim we understand to be the transference of soluble matter from material to liquid, if possible representing a grain of the material with a minim of the solution. iThis latter result we have not yet accomplished, and cannot by either process of maceration examined. In the first case we operate directly against the laws of nature. W e are continually transferring a dense solu¬ tion upward. !£n the latter example we neglect to take advantage of nature's greatest force. We use manual labour to accomplish, in the way of separating the liquid, what gravitation will do for us to any extent, and better in every particular. Now let us modify the operation by repeating the experiment of maceration exactly as here¬ tofore, but in a vessel with a layer of cotton at the bottom, and an exit below, care being taken to avoid stirring the powder. After the usual maceration, cautiously open the exit and allow the liquid to escape at the very bottom of the powder. As a consequence we obtain the densest liquid at first, and substitute in its stead at the surface perfectly fresh menstruum, with the advantage that the liquid extracted has always passed through the entire material. Thus we find the product is constantly decreasing in colour and flavour, and the powder is continually submitted to the action of a moving menstruum. We use no manual labour after preparing the apparatus, and have no pressed residue to pulverize. We simply connect maceration as before examined to one of nature s most familiar laws, and in this latter experiment have an exemplification of the process which Professor Procter recommended for the preparation of fluid extracts and tinctures. It is only a modification of the processes previously examined, differing in the manner in which the liquid is separated from the powder. It is simple in operation, easy in manipulation, and productive of satis¬ factory results when properly applied. It is called perco¬ lation, under which name we shall perhaps be led to examine some points of interest connected therewith, and some modifications which have been suggested as improvements over Professor Procter s process, very properly denominated simple percolation. Professor Procter, in bringing before pharmacists this process to deplete a powder of soluble matters laid no claim to originality, excepting in the application of the principle for the purpose of making tinctures and fluid extracts. He certainly was aware that the process had been in use, for a similar process was recommended by Count Bumford for preparing coffee; and in 1817 Mr. C. Johnson applied the principle to the extraction of cinchona bark, saying : “ The machine I use is similar to one made several years ago by Edmund Loyd and Co , 178, Strand, and does not differ essentially from any of those described in Count Rumford’s eighteenth essay, and in the Repertory of Arts, for April and May, 1813.” Of the practical application of the process, Mr. Johnson remarks, “that in the Lancaster Public Dis¬ pensary this method is found to afford a better prepara¬ tion than was formerly obtained from twice the quantity of cinchona.” (‘Annals of Phil.,’ vol. ix., p. 451.) I am informed by Mr. Charles Mohr that Mr. Pelouze, as early as 1834, introduced percolation into the labora¬ tory of the chemist in his method of preparing tannic acid, calling it “extraction by the process of displace¬ ment.” Virtually, percolation had been employed for ages before with civilized and even partly barbarous nations, as, for example, in making saltpetre and potash. Yet, while the idea was not new, its application to . the preparation of tinctures and fluid extracts was original, as far as I can learn, and thus we are as much indebted to Professor Procter as though the principle for separating soluble from insoluble matters was new in the world’s history. Professor Procter, by bringing forward this simple process and simple form of apparatus for the preparation of tinctures and fluid extracts, decreased the labour, the time, and the expense. The memory of . Prof essor Procter will ever be dear to American pharmacists, as well as to those across the great water. His field of labour was a wide one, and yet, perhaps, we are more indebted to him for adapting the process of simple percolation to pharma¬ ceuticals than the majority of us are apt to imagine. We cannot value his gift too highly; beautiful as it is in its simplicity, it is not less valuable than simple. In conducting percolation, the object being the pre¬ paration of fluid extracts, many points are essential other than the considerations mentioned heretofore. Of those the most essential to be considered are the vessel em¬ ployed, the material operated upon, the menstruum used, 196 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [September 4, 1880 and the manner of manipulation. Accepting the argu¬ ment that percolation is for the economical extraction of soluble materials, it is of the utmost importance to study influence of contact between the menstruum and the material whose partial solution is to be effected, as we have already seen that contact, continued for a length of time, is of first necessity. Thus, if we place a pound of powdered sugar, or any other soluble substance, within a cylindrical percolator of such diameter that the space occupied is 1 inch in height, and cautiously add, evenly upon the upper surface, diluted alcohol, admitting for the sake of argrxment that the menstruum passes evenly and regularly through the powder, the diluted alcohol in the first of the percolate will have been in contact with 1 inch of material. That which follows will have suc¬ cessively less material to operate upon, for the first portions of percolate are partly made up of dissolved sugar or extracted matter. Thus each preceding portion of the percolate lessens the material in the percolator, and lessens the height, thus decreasing the contact of any that may succeed, until finally only a thin layer of sugar remains, between which and the passing menstruum the contact is very slight indeed. At last the sugar disappears. For this reason, even where the material is completely soluble, our percolate should theoretically become less and less charged with dissolved matters as percolation progresses (unless it be saturated to a certain point of the percolate), and at la-t a com¬ paratively large amount of menstruum should contain but a small amount of dissolved material. In con¬ nection with the above argument tables 6 and 7 may be introduced. Let us now imagine a like amount of powdered sugar in a percolate of less diameter. The height will be increased and the contact between the first part of percolate and powder will be greater in proportion to the increased height. Allowing, for argument, the material to occupy 8 inches in height, it will follow that the menstruum of the first portion of percolate will have passed through eight times the height of sugar that the corresponding portion did in the former experiment, although the real amount of sugar was the same. Now, again, we have the afore-mentioned rule regarding decrease of contact. Each successive part of the percolate lessens the sugar in the percolator, and decreases the possible contact (with sugar) of all the menstruum that may follow, and under like motion of liquid the sugar decreases in each succeeding part of the percolate. It will be seen that, theoretically, each portion of the men¬ struum in the smaller percolator must have greater con¬ tact with the material than the corresponding menstruum of the larger, if both percolate with the same rapidity, although in both examples we operate upon similar amounts of material. Arguing therefrom we are in¬ duced to anticipate that unless the percolate from the percolator of greater diameter is saturated with sugar, that which corresponds from the smaller will contain more dissolved matter, for after 1 inch — the depth of sugar in the percolator of greatest diameter — is passed there remains in the smaller 7 inches of contact during which solution may progress. Calculating accordingly we may expect that if we spread a pound of sugar so that it will occupy a depth of 1 inch in a percolator, and percolate through it diluted alcohol enough to produce 16 fluid ounces of percolate, we will fail to obtain as much sugar in solution as though the sugar had been placed in a vessel of less diameter, thereby increasing the contact between menstruum and sugar. Applying the same rule to larger and smaller amounts of other substances, we must conclude that unless there be counterbalancing influences the amount of dissolved matter in a percolate must increase and decrease with alteration in the height of powder, other conditions being identical, and amount of percolate passing from each in a given time. In con¬ nection with this portion of the argument I will invite attention to tables 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11, in which tem¬ perature, rapidity of percolation, and menstruums of corresponding examples were identical. Let us not infer, however, that the conditions cannot render the foregoing to an extent inaccurate. If our material be placed loosely in the percolator as a con¬ sequence the first portion of menstruum will pass rapidly. I , If after the first fraction of percolate is obtained the flow be retarded by means of a stopcock, that which follows may be held in contact with the material some time longer than the first; after the second fraction is re¬ served the flow may be again retarded, and thus. more actual contact of time induced between menstruum and material than was obtained at first, although there is continually less material within the percolator. With some substances another benefit to be derived by the latter percolates arises from the fact that if the material be not finely divided or pressed firmly into the percolator the first portion of percolate flows over the particles and through the interstices between, thus preventing the menstruum flow coming into close contact with soluble materials. Gradually, however, the material may absorb menstruum, aud expanding fill up those interstices, thus forcing the passing percolate to seek more and more the capillary passages through the material, and thus give a larger amount of dissolved material to a portion of per¬ colate succeeding a certain amount of the first. To an extent this result may occur from a somewhat similar cause, even with materials perfectly soluble in the men¬ struum, as, for an example, sugar or salt. With small amounts of loosely packed granulated sugar the first part of a percolate of diluted alcohol or water quickly finds the exit of the percolator, but the surfaces of the particles are in the meantime softened and the mass contracts. The interstices become filled with thick syrup or solu¬ tion, and thus the percolates that follow are for a time retarded (see tables 12 and 13). It will be noticed that the foregoing discrepancies result simply from imperfect contact, or, as we may say, imperfect maceration. We will now consider another phase of the subject. Will a certain amount of material, occupying a height of 10 inches, yield to corresponding portions of percolate less dissolved matter than a smaller amount in a perco¬ lator of such size as to make the height 20 inches ? If we accept the foregoing arguments we must conclude this will be the case to a certain point of the operation, unless the percolate from each percolator is saturated, as each drop of menstruum passing through the one will come into contact with a larger portion of material than that from the other, until a certain amount of soluble matter is carried from the smallest amount of material, when it will naturally follow that the percolate from the largest amount of material will contain more dissolved matter. In other words, the first portion of percolate from the material occupying the greatest height will excel the other, while afterwards the case will be re¬ versed. Perpendicular height should govern to this extent the result from this standpoint regardless of quantity. For the greatest contact between powder and menstruums, moving with like rapidity, must be where there is greater height of powder regardless of breadth. Thus we are brought to tables 14 and 15 in which corresponding parts of percolates are tabu¬ lated. In considering now that phase of contact between menstruum and solid, called maceration, in connection with percolation, one cannot find any influence at work arising from a force other than those simply due to a prolongation of contact before considered. The passing menstruum is retarded, thus permitting a longer time for the action of the solvent. In treating of this entire subject let us bear constantly in mind that our aim is to dissolve solid substances, and that the .various modifica¬ tions of the processes are simply influences affecting solution. ( To he continued.) September 4, i860.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 197 SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 1880. Communications for the Editorial department of this Journal , boohs for review, etc., should be addressed to the Editor, 17, Bloomsbury Square. Instructions from Members and A ssociates respecting the transmission of the Journal should be sent to Mr. Elias Bremridge, Secretary , 17, Bloomsbury Square, W.C. Advertisements, and payments for Copies of the Journal , Messrs. Churchill, New Burlington Street, London, W. Envelopes indorsed “ Pharm. J ournJ THE BRITISH ASSOCIATION. The public proceedings of the Association having been, as stated last week, opened on Wednesday evening by the address of the President, Professor Ramsay, which was delivered before a moderate audience, the meetings of the various Sections have since been carried on with considerable vigour. The meetings have been wisely held principally in buildings situated towards the west end of Swansea, where, being separated a considerable distance from the smoke-belching chimneys of the Landore suburb, a nearer approach to a tolerable atmosphere exists than is to be found perhaps in any other part of the town. The addresses of the Presidents of the Sections have as a whole been very interesting, an unusual proportion of them dealing with topics interesting to the readers of this Journal, and which it is therefore proposed to take an early opportunity of reproducing. Among them may be mentioned the Address of the President of the Mathematical and Physical Science Section, Professor W. Grylls Adams, who discoursed on the constitution of matter principally in the light thrown upon it by recent spectroscopic investigation. Dr. Joseph H. Gilbert addressed the Chemical Section upon a subject with which his name has long been closely associated, the application of chemistry to agriculture. In the Geology Section, the President, Dr. H. C. Sorby, took for his subject the comparative struc¬ ture of artificial slags and erupted rocks. In the Biology Section, Dr. Gunther spoke with the au¬ thority belonging to him in virtue of his official position on the use and management of museums, incidentally describing the arrangement proposed to be adopted in the new natural history museum at South Kensington, whilst in the Anatomy and Physiology Department of the same Section Pro¬ fessor F. M. Balfour took for his text “ the coming of age of the origin of species.” These presidential addresses have been followed by the reading of a goodly number of papers in the different sections, besides which there has been a lecture on Primeval Man, by Professor W. Boyd Dawkins, and another on Mental Imagery, by Mr. Francis Galton. These, with the usual soirees and a large number of excursions, have constituted ample material for occupying the time of the scientific visitors to the Principality. At a general meeting of the Committee on Mon¬ day last, the subject of the meetings in 1881 and 1882 came under discussion. It was decided at Sheffield that the jubilee meeting of the Association should be held in York, where its first meeting took place, and now it was unanimously resolved that Sir John Lubbock should be the President of that meeting. With respect to the meeting in 1882, invitations have been received from four towns, Southampton, South- port, Nottingham and Leicester. Leicester, however, withdraws for the present from the competition, and the result of the first vote was unfavourable to Nottingham. Eventually it was decided to accept the invitation from Southampton by 27 votes against 22 given for Southport. The concluding meeting was held on Wednesday, when it was announced that only 914 tickets had been issued, being the smallest number issued in any year since 1852. The Association adjourned until the 31st of August, 1881. THE MANUFACTURE OF BOGUS DIPLOMAS. For several years past a considerable scandal has existed in consequence of the facility with which it has been possible to obtain diplomas purporting to be issued by more or less learned bodies, though the sole value of such diplomas consisted in their affecting to grant titles and degrees resembling those conferred by universities of repute as a testimony of the holders having satisfied the requirements of a university curriculum and examination. Certain universities on the Continent, from which better things might have been expected, have not been free from this taint, but the principal manufactories, like many other big things, have had their home across the Atlantic, and the name of Pennsylvania has long been malodorous in this respect. Many attempts have been made to stop this traffic, and foreign governments have pressed their complaints concerning it upon the Washington authorities, but hitherto the evil has not been effectually grappled with by them, and apparently it has been left to the volunteer efforts of the Editor of the Philadelphia Record to break up some of the most notorious rings engaged in it. Stripped of the sensational paragraphing which seems to be in¬ separable from American journalism, there is enough in what may be deemed the sober facts to make one ponder upon the public estimation of the relative value of titles in this age of quackery. The “ American University of Philadelphia ” seems to have been started by a man named Buchanan, formerly a porter, but who had in 1867 somehow obtained a charter from the State legislature “ empowering him to confer all manner « of degrees upon those who had attended a course « of study.” In so reckless a manner were diplomas distributed under this authority— some being said to 198 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [September 4, 1880 have been distributed gratuitously among coloured voters to influence local elections — that at length a committee was appointed by the Senate to investi¬ gate the scandal, the result being a resolution to repeal the charter. But the power of the Senate to repeal it was disputed in the law courts by Buchanan, and eventually successfully, and in the meanwhile he fell back upon another charter that he had obtained for the “ American University,” which had been overlooked. This contretemps seems to have given an impetus and additional audacity to the move¬ ment, so that when recently the proprietors of the Philadelphia Record entered into a compact with the legal authorities to find the funds necessary for an attempt to break up the system, the agent em¬ ployed, it is said, obtained for a sum equal to about i>45 sterling, no less than eight diplomas from seven “ universities ” and “ colleges,” five being for the degree of M.D., and one each for those of D.D., LL.D, and D.C.L. The story of the schemes by which several di¬ plomas were obtained by the same person under different names is very amusing, but cannot be recapitulated here. One of the most expensive — having cost twenty-five hours in time and £26 in cash — was for the curious degree of “ Master in Electro-Therapeutics,” and was declared to be granted to one “ qui bene curriculo studiorum “praescripto perfunctus est, et quern justo et “ rigido examine prius habito, hoc gradu dignis- “simum censuimus.” The result was that “Dr.” Buchanan and some of his colleagues were arrested, he being charged with devising a scheme to defraud by means of the Post Office of the United States. A few days afterwards proceedings were commenced against the trustees and officers of the “ Philadelphia University of Medicine and Surgery,” concerning whom it is in evidence that in conferring degrees upon a person of whom they knew nothing except the name they had made an infant two years old an M.D. and LL.D. Some idea may be formed of the extent to which this traffic extended from the statement that when Buchanan was arrested the officers discovered on the premises nearly half a ton weight of blank di¬ plomas, some of them signed by the “ faculty ” and prepared for the insertion of the names of buyers. Receipts were also found showing that fully three thousand diplomas have been sold during the past six years, and it is estimated that during the last twenty- two years Buchanan has sold at least eleven thousand diplomas. The Philadelphia Record is carrying on the work of exposure with great zeal and is evidently deter¬ mined to spare no effort to tread the swindle out of existence. Column after column is filled with lists of persons who are alleged to have countenanced these “universities” and those who have obtained diplomas from them. It appears, however, that the charters of Buchanan’s colleges are still valid, and therefore the diplomas issued from them, when regular, although they may have little or no intrinsic value, are possessed of some legal status. In the State of Pennsylvania which chartered these colleges the diplomas must be recognized in the courts unless shown to be irregular. Fortunately many of them are so, and it is so far satisfactory to learn that all their diplomas for the titles of Graduate in Pharmacy and Doctor of Dental Surgery are in¬ formal and worthless, as the colleges were not authorized to confer those degrees. It is needless to say that our contemporary has our hearty sympathy in its labours, the difficulty of which is shown by the success with which all pre¬ vious official attempts in the same direction had been baffled. We notice a statement in the Medical Times and Gazette that the chief culprit, Buchanan, who was admitted to bail, has disappeared, and it is conjectured that he has committed suicide. But there is little in the history of his previous career suggestive that he would adopt such a method of getting out of a difficulty. _ EXPERIMENTAL CULTIVATION IN JAMAICA. In a series of papers relating to Her Majesty’s colonial possessions, recently presented to Parlia¬ ment, there is some interesting information as to the results attending some cultivation experiments that are being made in the island of J amaica. Cinchona cultivation seems to promise well, the fact that bark of the best quality can be produced in the island being said to be demonstrated and the establishment of a remunerative plantation being considered to be only a matter of time. A quantity of seed of the carnauba palm ( Copernica cerifera ) has been intro¬ duced among other Brazilian plants, and hundreds of trees are reported to be growing. An experiment ' with the cocoa plant ( Theobroma Cacao) does not seem to have been so successful. In the orange cultiva¬ tion there has been a considerable development. In the Castleton Gardens the clove has borne fruit freely and trees have been raised from seed for distribution. The cinnamon ( Cinnamomum Zeylani- cum ) has not thriven there, but the Cinnamomum Cassia grows luxuriantly, and plants of it are eagerly sought by the peasantry, who use the bark for flavouring tea and medicinal purposes. The Liberian coffee plant has also been introduced and the trees first received have borne a small crop of fruit. Concerning this plant the Superintendent of the Castleton Gardens reports that taking equal numbers of average fruit of the two species (Arabian and Liberian), grown side by side on the same ground, the relative weight of the Liberian was as eight to three of the Arabian. The Liberian variety is slow in maturing, taking fully twelve months from the season of flowering, and it is thought probable that it will not be so easily pulped as the ordinary kind. THE MEETING OF THE COUNCIL. The meeting of the Council, which should have taken place on Wednesday last, -was postponed in consequence of a quorum not having bee formed. September 4, 1880.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 199 IPrambtugs of Scientific Societies, THE BRITISH ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE. The President’s Address. ON THE RECURRENCE OP CERTAIN PHENOMENA IN GEOLOGICAL TIME. BY PROFESSOR RAMSAY. (Concluded from 'page 188.) Volcanoes. The oldest volcanic products of which I have personal knowledge are of Lower Silurian age. These in Wales consist of two distinct series, the oldest of which, chiefly formed of felspathic lavas and volcanic ashes, lie in and near the base of the Llandeilo beds, and the second, after a long interval of repose, were ejected and intermingled with the strata forming the middle part of the Bala beds. The Lower Silurian rocks of Montgomeryshire, Shropshire, Radnorshire, Pembrokeshire, Cumberland and West¬ moreland are to a great extent also the result of volcanic eruptions, and the same kind of volcanic rocks occur in the Lower Silurian strata of Ireland. I know of no true volcanic rocks in the Upper Silurian series. In the Old Red Sandstone of Scotland lavas and volcanic ashes are of frequent occurrence, interstratified with the ordinary lacustrine sedimentary strata. Volcanic rocks are also intercalated among the Devonian strata of Devonshire. I know of none in America or on the continent of Europe. In Scotland volcanic products are common throughout nearly the whole of the Carboniferous sub-formations, and they are found also associated with Permian strata. I come now to Mesozoic or Secondary epochs. Of Jurassic age (Lias and Oolites), it is stated by Lyell with some doubt, that true volcanic products occur in the Morea and also in the Apennines, and it seems probable, as stated by Medlicott and Blanford, that the Rajmahal traps may also be of Jurassic age. In the Cordillera of South America, Darwin has described a great series of volcanic rocks intercalated among the Cretaceo- oolitic strata that forms so much of the chain ; and the same author in his ‘ Geological Observations in South America,’ states that the C >rdil- lera has been, probably with some quiescent periods, a source of volcanic matter from an epoch anterior to our Cretaceo-oolitic formation to the present day. In the Deccan volcanic traps rest on Cretaceous beds, and are overlaid by Nummulitic strata, and according to Medlicott and Blanford, these were poured out in the interval between Middle Cretaceous and Lower Eocene times. In Europe the only instance I know of a volcano of Eocene age is that of Monte Bolca near Verona, where the volcanic products are associated with the fissile lime¬ stone of that area. The well-preserved relics of Miocene volcanoes are prevalent over many parts of Europe such as Auvergne, and The Velay, where the volcanic action began in Lower Miocene times, and was continued into the Pliocene epoch. The volcanoes of the Eifel are also of the same general age, together with the ancient Miocene volcanoes of Hungary. The volcanic rocks of the Azores, Canaries, and Madeira are of Miocene age, while in Tuscany there are extinct volcanoes that began inlate Miocene, and lasted into times contemporaneous with the English Coralline Crag. In the north of Spain also,' at Olot in Catalonia, there are perfect craters and cones remaining of volcanoes that began to act in newer Pliocene times ani continued in action to a later geological date. To these I must add the great coulees of Miocene lava, so well known in the Inner Hebrides, on the mainland near Oban, etc., in Antrim in the north of Irelaiid, in the Faroe Islands, Greenland, and Franz- Joseph Land. It is needless, and would be tiresome, further to multiply instances, for enough has been said to show that in nearly all geological ages volcanoes have played an important part, now in’ one region, now in another, from very early Paleozoic times down to the present day ; and, as far as my knowledge extends, at no period of geological history is there any sign of their having played a more important part than they do in the epoch in which we live. Mountain Chains. The mountain chains of the world are of different geological ages, some of them of great antiquity, and some of them comparatively modern. It is well known that in North America the Lower Silurian rocks lie uncomformably on the Laurentian strata, and also that the latter had undergone a thorough metamorphism and been thrown into great anticlinal and synclinal folds, accompanied by intense minor convolutions, before the deposition of the oldest Silurian formation, that of the Potsdam Sandstone. Disturbances of the nature alluded to imply beyond a doubt that the Lauren¬ tian rocks formed a high mountain chain of pre-Silurian date, which has since constantly been borne away and degraded by subaerial denudation. In Shropshire, and in parts of North Wales, and in Cumberland and Westmoreland, the Lower Silurian rocks by upheaval formed hilly land before the beginning of the Upper Silurian epoch, and it is probable that the Lower Silurian gneiss of Scotland formed monntains at the same time, probably very much higher than now. However that may be, it is certain that these mountains formed highland before and during the deposition of the Old Red Sandstone, and the upheaval of the great Scandinavian chain (of which the Highlands may be said to form an outlying portion) also preceded the deposition of the Old Red Strata. In both of these mountain regions the rocks have since undergone considerable movements, which in the main seem to have been movements of elevation, accompanied undoubtedly by that constant atmospheric degradation to which all high land is especially subject. The next great European chain in point of age is that of the Ural, which, according to Murchison, is of pre- Permian age, a fact proved by the Permian conglomerates which were formed from the waste of the older strata. On these they lie quite unconformably and nearly un¬ disturbed on the western flank of the mountains. In North America the great chain of the Alleghany Mountains underwent several disturbances, the last (a great one) having taken place after the deposition of the Carboniferous rocks, and before that of the New Red Sand¬ stone. The vast mountainous region included under the name of the Rocky Mountains, after several successive disturbances of upheaval, did not attain its present de¬ velopment till after the Miocene or Middle Tertiary epoch. In South America, notwithstanding many oscillations of level recorded by Darwin, the main great disturbance of the strata that form the chain of the Andes took place apparently in post - Cretaceous times. The Alps, the rudiments of which began in more ancient times, received their greatest disturbance and upheaval in post-Eocene days, and were again raised at least 5000 feet (I believe much more) at the close of the Miocene epoch. The Apennines, the Pyrenees, the Car¬ pathians, and the great mountain region on the east of the Adriatic and southward into Greece, are of the same general age, and this is also the case in regard to the Atlas in North Africa and the Caucasus on the borders of Europe and Asia. In the north of India the history of the Great Himalayan range closely coincides with that of the Alps, for while the most powerful known disturbance and elevation of the range took place after the close of the Eocene epoch, a subsequent elevation occurred in post- Miocene times closely resembling and at least equal to that sustained by the Alps at the same period. It would probably not be difficult by help of extra 200 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [September 4, 1880. research to add other cases to this notice of recurrences of the upheaval and origin of special mountain chains, some of which I have spoken of from personal know¬ ledge ; but enough has been given to show the bearing of this question on the argument I have in view, namely, that of repetition of the same kind of events throughout all known geological time. Salt and Salt Lakes. I now come to the discussion of the circumstances that produced numerous recurrences of the development of beds of various salts (chiefly common rock-salt) in many formations, which it will be seen are to a great extent connected with continental or inland conditions. In comparatively rainless countries salts are often deposited on the surface of the ground by the effect of solar evapo¬ ration of moisture from the soil. Water dissolves certain salts in combination with the ingredients of the under¬ lying rocks and soils, and brings it to the surface, and when solar evaporation ensues the salt or salts are de¬ posited on the ground. This is well known to be the case in and near the region of the Great Salt Lake in North America, and in South America in some of the nearly rainless districts of the Cordillera extensive surface deposits of salts of various kinds are common. The surface of the ground around the Dead Sea is also in extra dry seasons covered with salt, the result of evapo¬ ration, and in the upper provinces of India (mentioned by Medlicott and Blanford) “ many tracts of land in the Indo-Gangetic alluvial plain are rendered worthless for cultivation by an efflorescence of salt known in the North-West Provinces as reh,” while every geographer knows that in Central Asia from the western shore of the Caspian Sea to the Kinshan Mountains of Mongolia, with rare exceptions nearly every lake is salt in an area at least 3500 miles in length. This circumstance is due to the fact that all so-called fresh-water springs, and therefore all rivers, contain small quantities of salts in solution only appreciable to the chemist, and by the constant evaporation of pure water from the lakes, in the course of time, it necessarily happens that these salts get concentrated in the water by the effect of solar heat, and, if not already begun, precipitation of solid salts must ensue. The earliest deposits of rock-salt that I know about have been described by Mr. A. B. Wynne, of the Geo¬ logical Survey of India, in his memoir ‘ On the Geology of the Salt Range in the Punjab.’* The beds of salt are of great thickness, and along with gypsum and dolomitic layers occur in marl of a red colour like our Keuper marl. This colour I have for many years considered to be, in certain cases, apt to indicate deposition of sediments in inland lakes, salt or fresh, as the case may be, and with respect to these strata in the Punjab Salt Range, authors seem to be in doubt whether they were formed in inland lakes or in lagoons near the seaboard, which at intervals were liable to be flooded by the sea, and in which in the hot seasons salts were deposited by evaporation caused by solar heat. For my argument it matters but little which of these was the true physical condition of the land of the time, though I incline to think the inland lake theory most probable. The age of the strata asso¬ ciated with this salt is not yet certainly ascertained. In * The Geology of India,’ Medlicott and Blanford incline to consider them of Lower Silurian age, and Mr. Wynne, in his ‘ Geology of the Salt Range,’ places the salt and gypsum beds doubtfully on the same geological horizon. The next salt-bearing formation that I shall notice is the Salina or Onondaga Salt Group of North America, which forms part of the Upper Silurian rocks, and lies immediately above the Niagara Limestone. It is rich in gypsum and in salt-brine, often of a very concentrated character, “ which can only be derived from original * Many earlier notices and descriptions of the Salt Range might be quoted, but Mr. Wynne’s is enough for my purpose. depositions of salt,” and it is also supposed by Dr. T. Sterry Hunt to contain solid rock-salt 115 feet in thick-' ness at the depth of 2085 feet near Saginaw Bay, in Michigan. In the Lower Devonian strata of Russia near Lake Ilmen, Sir R. Murchison describes salts springs at Starai Russa. Sinkings “ made in the hope of penetrating to the source of these salt springs,” reached a depth of 600 feet without the discovery of rock salt, “and we are left in doubt whether the real source of the salt is in the lowest beds of the Devonian rocks or even in the Silurian system.” In the United States brine springs also occur in Ohiof Pennsylvania and Virginia, in Devonian rocks. In Michigan salts are found from the Carboniferous down to the Devonian series ; and in other parts of the United States, Western Pennsylvania, Virginia, Ohio, Illinois and Kentucky, from the lower Coal-measures salts are derived which must have been deposited in inland areas, since even in the depths of inland seas that- communicate with the great ocean, such as the Mediter¬ ranean and the Red Sea, no great beds of salt can be deposited. Before such strata of salt can be formed,, supersaturation must have taken place. In the North of England at and near Middlesbrough, two deep-bore holes were made some years ago in the- hope of reaching the Coal-measures of the Durham coal¬ field. One of them at Salthome was sunk to a depth of 1355 feet. First they passed through 74 feet of super¬ ficial clay and gravel, next through about 1175 feet of red sandstones and marls, with beds of rock-salt and gypsum. The whole of these strata (excepting the clay and gravel) evidently belong to the Keuper marls and sandstones of the upper part of our New Red series. Beneath these they passed through 67 feet of dolomitic limestone, which in this neighbourhood forms the upper part of the Permian series, and beneath the limestone the strata consist of 27 feet of gypsum and rock-salt and marls, one of the beds of rock-salt having a thickness of 14 feet. This bed of Permian salt is of some importance, since I have been convinced for long that the British Permian strata were deposited, not in the sea, but in salt lakes comparable in some respects to the great salt lake of Utah, and in its restricted fauna to the far greater salt lake of the Caspian Sea. The gypsum, the dolomite or magnesian limestone, the red marls covered with rain-pittings, the sun-cracks, and the impressions of footprints of reptiles made in the soft sandy marls when the water was temporarily lowered by the solar evaporation of successive summers, all point to the fact that our Permian strata were not deposited in the sea, but in a salt lake or lakes once for a time connected with the sea. The same may be said of other Permian areas in the central parts of the Continent of Europe, such as Stassfurt and Anhalt, Halle and Altern in Thuringia, and Sperenberg, near Berlin, and also in India.* Neither do I think that the Permian strata of Russia, as described by Sir Roderick Murchison, were necessarily, as he implies, deposited in a wide ocean. According to his view all marine life universally declined to a minimum after the close of the Carboniferous period, that decline beginning with the Permian and ending with the Triassic epoch. Those who believe in the doctrine of evolution will find it hard to accept the idea which this implies, namely, that all the prolific forms of the Jurassic series sprang from the scanty faunas of the Permian and Triassic epochs. On the contrary, it seems to me more rational to attribute the poverty of the faunas of these epochs to accidental abnormal conditions in certain areas, that for a time partially disappeared during the deposition of the continental Muschelkalk which is absent in the British Triassic series. In the whole of the Russian Permian strata only * See ‘ Physical Geology and Geography of Great Britain,’ 5th edition, where the question is treated in more detail. September 4, 1880.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 201 fifty-three species were known at the time of the publica¬ tion of ‘Russia and the Ural Mountains,’ and I have not heard that this scanty list has been subsequently increased. I am therefore inclined to believe that the red marls, grits, sandstones, conglomerates, and great masses of gypsum and rock-salt were all formed in a flat inland area which was occasionally liable to be invaded by the sea during intermittent intervals of minor de¬ pression, sometimes in one area, sometimes in another, and the fauna small in size and poor in numbers is one of the results, while the deposition of beds of salt and gypsum is another. If so, then in the area now called Russia, in sheets of inland Permian water, deposits were formed strictly analogous to those of Central Europe and of Britain, but on a larger scale. Other deposits of salt deep beneath overlying younger strata are stated to occur at Bromberg in Prussia, and many more might be named as lying in the same forma¬ tion in northern Germany. If we now turn to the Triassic series it is known that it consists of only two chief members in Britain, the Bunter sandstones and the Keuper or New Red marls, the Muschelkalk of the Continent being absent in our islands. No salt is found in the Bunter sandstones of England, but it occurs in these strata at Schdningen in Brunswick and also near Hanover. In the lower part of the Keuper series deposits of rock-salt are common in England and Ireland. At Almersleben, near Calbe, rock-salt is found in the Muschelkalk, and also at Erfurt and Slottenheim in Thuringia and at Wilhelmsgltick in Wurtemburg. In other Triassic areas it is known at Honigsen, in Hanover, in middle Keuper beds. In the red shales at Sperenberg and Lieth on the Lower Elbe, salt was found at the depth of 3000 feet, and at Stassfurth the salt is said to be “ several hundred yards thick.” In Central Spain rock-salt is known, and at Tarragona, Taen, and also at Santander in the north of Spain, all in Triassic strata. Other localities may be named in the Upper Trias, such as the Salzkammergut, Aussee, Iiallstatt, Ischl, Hallein in Salzburg, Halle in the Tyrol, and Berchesgaden in Bavaria. In the Salt Range of mountains in Northern India saliferous strata are referred with some doubt by Medli- cott and Blanford 'to the Triassic strata. In the Jurassic series (Lias and Oolites), salt and gypsum are not uncommon. One well-known instance occurs at Berg in the valley of the Rhone in Switzei’land, where salt is derived from the Lias. Salt and gypsum are also found in Jurassic rocks at Burgos in Spain. At Gap in France there is gypsum, and salt is found in the Austrian Alps in Oolitic limestone. In the Cretaceous rocks salt occurs, according to Lartet, at Jebel Usdom by the Dead Sea, and other authorities state that it occurs in the Pyrenees and at Biskra in Africa, where “ mountains of salt ” are mentioned as of Cretaceous age. The two last-named localities are possibly uncertain ; but whether or not this is the case, it is not the less certain that salt has been deposited in Cretaceous rocks, and judging by analogy, probably in inland areas of that epoch. In the Eocene or Older Tertiary formation, rock-salt is found at Cardona in Spain, and at Kohat in the Punjab it occurs at the base of Nummulitic beds. It is also known at Mandi in India in strata supposed to be of Nummulitic Eocene age. The record does not end here, for a zone of rock-salt lies in Sicily at the top of the Salina clays in Lower Miocene beds, and in Miocene strata gypsum is found at several places in Spain, while salt also occurs in beds that are doubtfully of Miocene age (but may be later) at Wielitzka in Poland, Kalusz in Galicia, Bukowina, and also in Transylvania. In Pliocene, or Later Tertiary formations, thick beds pf gypsum are known in Zante, and strata of salt occur m Roumania and Galicia, while in Pliocene rocks, accord¬ ing to Dana, or in post-Tertiary beds, according to others, a thick bed of pure salt was penetrated to a depth of 38 feet at Petet Anse in Louisiana. This ends my list, though I have no doubt that, by further research, many more localities might be given. Enough, however, has been done to show that rock-salt land other salts) are of frequent recurrence throughout all geological time, and as in my opinion it is impossible that common salt can be deposited in the open ocean, it follows that this and other salts must have been preeijoitated from solutions, which by the effect of solar evaporation became at length super¬ saturated, like those of the Dead Sea, the great salt lake of Utah, and in other places which it is superfluous to name. Fresh-water. Lakes and Estuaries. I now come to the subject of recurrences of fresh- water conditions both in lakes and estuaries. In the introduction to the ‘Geology of India,’ by Messrs. Medlicott and Blanford, mention is made of the Blaini and Krol rocks as probably occupying “ hollows formed by denudation in the old gneissic rocks,” and the inference is drawn that “if this be a correct view, it is probable that the cis- Himalayan Palaeozoic rocks are in great part of fresh¬ water origin, and that the present crystalline axis of the Western Himalayas approximately coincides with the shore of the ancient Palaeozoic continent, of which the Indian peninsula formed a portion.’’ The Krol rocks are classed broadly with “Permian and Carboniferous” de¬ posits, but the Blaini beds are doubtfully considered to belong to Upper Silurian strata. If this point be by- and-by established, this is the earliest known occurrence of fresh-water strata in any of the more ancient Palaeozoic formations. It is a fact worthy of notice that the colour of the strata formed in old lakes (whether fresh or salt) of Palasozic and Mesozoic age is apt to be red: a circum¬ stance due to the fact that each little grain of sand or mud is usually coated with a very thin pellicle of peroxide of iron. Whether or not the red and purple Cambrian rocks* may not he partly of fresh- water origin, is a ques¬ tion that I think no one but myself has raised. + There is, however, in my opinion, no doubt with regard to the fresh-water origin of the Old Red Sandstone, as distinct from the contemporaneous marine deposits of the Devonian strata. This idea was first started by that distinguished geologist. Doctor Fleming, of Edinburgh, followed by Mr. Godwin-Austen, who, from the absence of marine shells and the nature of the fossil fishes in these strata, inferred that they were deposited, not in the sea, as had always been asserted, but in a great fresh¬ water lake or in a series of lakes. In this opinion I have for many years agreed, for the nearest analogies of the fish are, according to Huxley, the polypterus of African rivers, the ceratodus of Australia, and in less degree the lepidosteus of North America. The truth of the supposition that the Old Red Sandstone was deposited in fresh water is further borne out by the occurrence of a fresh-water shell, Anodonta Jukesii , and of ferns in the Upper Old Red Sandstone in Ireland ; and the same shell is found at Dura Den in Scotland, while in Caithness, along with numerous fishes, there occurs the small bi¬ valve crustacean Estheria Murchisoniae. I think it more than probable that the red series of rocks that form the Catskill Mountains of North America (and with which I am personally acquainted) were formed in the same manner as the Old Red Sandstones of Britain ; for excepting in one or two minor interstratifications, they contain no relics of marine life, while “ the fossil fishes of the Catskill beds, according to Dr. Newberry, appear to represent closely those of the British Old Red Sandstone.” (Dana.) * By Cambrian I mean only the red and purple rocks of Wales, England, Scotland and Ireland, older than the Menevian beds, or any later division of the Silurian strata, that may chance to rest upon them. f “On the Red Rocks of England of older date than the Trias.” Jour. Geol. Soc., 1871, vol. 28. 202 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [September 4, i860. The Devonian rocks of Russia, according to the late Sir Roderick Murchison, consist of two distinct types, viz., Devonian strata identical in general character with those in Devonshire and in various parts of the continent of Europe. These are exclusively of a marine character, while the remainder corresponds to the Old Red Sandstone of Wales, England and Scotland. At Tchudora, about 105 miles S.E. of St. Petersburg, the lowest members of the series consist of flag-like compact limestones accumulated in a tranquil sea and containing fucoids and encrinites, together with shells of Devonian age, such as Spirifers, Terebratulae, Orthis, Leptsenas, Avicula, Modiola, Natica, Bellerophon, etc., while the upper division graduates into the Carboniferous series as it often does in Britain, and, like the Old Red Sandstone of Scotland, contains only fish-remains, and in both countries they are of the same species. “ Proceeding from the Valdai Hills on the north,” the geologist “quits a Devonian Zone xvilh a true 1 Old Red ’ type dipping under the Carboniferous rocks of Moscow, and having passed through the latter, he finds himself suddenly in a yellow-coloured region, entirely dissimilar in structure to what he had seen in any of the northern governments, which, of a different type as regards fossils, is the true stratigraphical equivalent of the Old Red system .” This seems to me, as regards the Russian strata, to mean, that just as the Devonian strata of Devonshire are the true equivalents of the Old Red Sandstone of Wales and Scotland, they were deposited under very different conditions, the first in the sea and the others in inland fresh-water lakes. At the time Sir Roderick Murchison’s work was completed, the almost universal opinion was that the Old Red Sandstone was a marine formation. In the year 1830, the Rev. Dr. Fleming, of Edinburgh, read a paper before the Wernerian Society in which he boldly stated that the “ Old Red Sandstone is a fresh-water forma¬ tion ” of older date than the Carboniferous Limestone. This statement, however, seems to have made no impres¬ sion on geologists till it was revived by G-odwin-Austen in a memoir “ On the Extension of the Coal-measures,” etc., in the Journal of the Geological Society , 1856. Even this made no converts to what was then considered a heretical opinion. I have long held Dr. Fleming’s view and unfortunately published it in the third edition of ‘ The Physical Geology and Geography of Great Britain,’ without at the time being aware that I had been fore¬ stalled by Dr. Fleming and Mr. Godwin-Austen. To give anything like a detailed account of all the fresh-water formations deposited in estuaries and lakes from the close of the Old Red Sandstone times down to late Tertiary epochs, is only fitted for a manual of geology, and would too much expand this address; and I will therefore give little more than a catalogue of these deposits in ascending order. In the Coal-measure parts of the Carboniferous series, a great proportion of the shales and sandstones are of fresh-water origin. This is proved all over the British Islands by the shells they contain, while here and there marine interstratifications occur, generally of no great thickness. There is no doubt among geologists that these Coal-measure strata were chiefly deposited under estuarine conditions, and sometimes in lagoons or in lakes ; while numerous beds of coal formed by the life and death of land plants, each underlaid by the soil on which the plants grew, evince the constant recurrence of terrestrial conditions. The same kind of phenomena are character¬ istic of the Coal-measures all through North America, and in every country on the continent of Europe, from France and Spain on the west, to Russia in the east, and the same is the case in China and in other areas. In Scotland, according to Professor Judd, fresh-water conditions occur more or less all through the Jurassic series, from the Lias to the Upper Oolites. In England, fresh-water strata, with thin beds of coal, are found in the Inferior Oolite of Yorkshire, and in the middle of England and elsewhere in the Great Oolite. The Purbeck and Wealden strata, which, in a sense, fill the interval between the Jurassic and Cretaceous series, are almost entirely formed of fresh-water strata, with occasional thin marine interstratifications. By some the Wealden beds are considered to have been formed in and near the estuary of a great river, while others, with as good a show of reason, believe them to have been deposited in a large lake subject to the occasional influx of the sea. In the eastern part of South Russia the Lias consists chiefly of fresh-water strata, as stated by Neumayr. The Godwana rocks of Central India range from Upper Palaeozoic times well into the Jurassic strata, and there all these formations are of fresh-water origin. Fresh¬ water beds with shells are also interstratified with the Deccan traps of Cretaceous and Tertiary (Eocene) age, while 2000 feet of fresh-water sands overlie them. In south-western Sweden, as stated by Mr. Bauerman, “the three coalfields of Hoganas, Stabbarp, and Rodingd, lie in the uppermost Triassic or Rhietic series.” In Africa, the Karoo beds, which it is surmised may be of the age of the New Red Sandstone, contain beds of coal. In North America, certain fresh- water strata, with beds of lignite, apparently belong to the Cretaceous and Eocene epochs, and in the north of Spain and soiith of France, there are fresh-water lacustrine formations in the highest Cretaceous strata. In England the lower and upper Eocene strata are chiefly of fresh-water origin, and the same is the case in France and other parts of the Continent. Certain fresh¬ water formations in Central Spain extend from the Eocene to the upper Miocene strata. There is only one small, patch of Miocene beds in England, at Bovey Tracey, near Dartmoor, formed of fresh-water deposits with interstratified beds of lignite or Miocene coal. On the continent of Europe, Miocene strata occupy immense (independent areas, extending from France and Spain to the Black Sea. In places too numerous to name, they contain beds of “ brown coal,” as lignite is sometimes called. These coal beds are often of great thickness and solidity. In one of the pits which I descended near Teplitz, in Bohemia, the coal, which lies in a true basin, is 40 feet thick, and underneath it there is a bed of clay, with rootlets, quite comparable to the underclay which is found beneath almost every bed of coal in the British and other coal-fields of the Carboni- ( ferous epoch. The Miocene rocks of Switzerland are familiar to all geologists who have traversed the country between the Jura and the Alps. Sometimes they are soft and incoherent, sometimes formed of sandstones, and sometimes of conglomerates, as on the Righi. They chiefly consist of fresh-water lacustrine strata, with some minor marine interstratifications which mark the influx of the sea during occasional partial submergences of portions of the area. These fresh-water strata, of great extent and thickness, contain beds of lignite, and are remarkable for the relics of numerous trees and other plants which have been described by Professor Heer of Zurich, with his accustomed skill. The Miocene fresh¬ water strata, of the Sewalik Hills in India are well known to most students of geology, and I have already stated that they bear the same relation to the more ancient Himalayan Mountains that the Miocene strata of Switzerland and the North of Italy do to the pre-existing range of the Alps. In fact, it may be safely inferred that something far more than the rudiments of our present continents existed long before Miocene times, and this accounts for the large areas on those continents which are frequently occupied by Miocene fresh-water strata. WitlT'the marine formations of Miocene age this address is in no way concerned, nor is it essential to my argument to deal with those later Tertiary phenomena, which in their upper stages so easily merge into the existing state of the world. I Glacial Phenomena. I now come to the last special subject for discussion in September 4, 1880.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 203 this address, viz., the recurrence of glacial epochs, a subject still considered by many to be heretical, and which was generally looked upon as an absurd crotchet when, in 1855, I first described to the Geological Society, boulder-beds, containing ice-scratched stones, and erratic blocks in the Permian strata of England. The same idea I afterwards applied to some of the Old Red Sandstone conglomerates, and of late years it has become so familiar, that the effects of glaciers have at length been noted by geologists from older Palaeozoic epochs down to the present day. In the middle of last July I received a letter from Professor Geikie, in which he informed me that he had discovered mammilated moutonnee surfaces of Laurentian rocks, passing underneath the Cambrian sandstones of the north-west of Scotland at intervals, all the way from Cape Wrath to Loch Torridon, for a distance of about ninety miles. The mammilated rocks are, says Professor Geikie, “ as well rounded off as any recent roche mou¬ tonnee,” and “in one place these bosses are covered by a huge angular breccia of this old gneiss (Laurentian) with blocks sometimes five or six feet long.” This breccia, where it occurs, forms the base of the Cambrian strata of Sutherland, Ross and Cromarty, and while the higher strata are always well stratified, where they approach the underlying Laurentian gneiss, “ they become pebbly, passing into coarse unstratified agglomerates or boulder- beds.” In the Gairloch district, “it is utterly unstrati¬ fied, the angular fragments standing on end and at all angles,” just as they do in many modern moraine mounds wherever large glaciers are found. The general subject of Palaeozoic glaciers has long been familiar to me, and this account of more ancient glaciers of Cambrian age is peculiarly acceptable. The next sign of ice in Britain is found in the Lower Silurian rocks of Wigtonshire and Ayrshire. In the year 1865, Mr. John Carrick Moore took me to see the Lower Silurian graptolitic rocks at Corswall Point, in Wigtonshire, in which great blocks of gneiss, granite, etc., are imbedded, and in the same year many similar erratic blocks were pointed out to me by Mr. James Geikie in the Silurian strata of Carrick, in Ayrshire. One of the blocks at Corswall, as measured by myself, is nine feet in length, and the rest are of all sizes, from an inch or two up to several feet in diameter. There is no gneiss or granite in this region nearer than those of Kirkcudbrightshire and Arran, and these are of later geological date than the strata amid which the erratic blocks are imbedded. It is therefore not improbable that they may have been derived from some high land formed of Laurentian rocks of which the outer Hebrides and parts of the mainland of Scotland form surviving portions. If so, then I can conceive of no agent capable of transporting large boulders and dropping them into the Lower Silurian mud of the seas of the time save that of icebergs or other floating ice, and the same view with regard to the neighbouring boulder-beds of Ayrshire is held by Mr. James Geikie. If, however, any one will point out any other natural cause still in action by which such results are at present brought about, I should be very glad to hear of it. I must now turn to India for further evidence of the action of palaeozoic ice. In the Himalayas of Pangi, S.E. of Kashmir, according to Medlicott and Blanford, “ old slates, supposed to be Silurian, contain boulders in great numbers,” which they believe to be of glacial origin. Another case is mentioned as occurring in “transition beds of unknown relations,” but in another passage they are stated to be “ very ancient, but no idea can be formed of their geological position.” The under¬ lying rocks are marked by distinct glacial striations. The next case of glacial boulder- beds with which I am acquainted is found in Scotland, and in some places in the north of England, where they contain what seem to be indistinctly ice-scratched stones. I first observed these rocks on the Lammermuir Hills, south of Dunbar, lying unconformably on Lower Silurian strata, and soon inferred them to be of glacial origin, a circumstance that was subsequently confirmed by my colleagues, Professor and Mr. James Geikie, and is now familiar to other officers of the Geological Survey of Scotland. I know of no boulder formations in the Carboniferous series, but they are well known as occurring on a large scale in the Permian brecciated conglomerates, where they consist “ of pebbles and large blocks of stone, generally angular, imbedded in a marly paste . the fragments have mostly travelled from a distance, apparently from the borders of Wales, and some of them are 3 feet in diameter.” Some of the stones are as well scratched as those found in modern moraines or in the ordinary boulder-clay of what is commonly called the glacial epoch. In 1855 the old idea was still not unpre- valent that during the Permian epoch, and for long after, the globe had not yet cooled sufficiently to allow of the climates of the external world being universally affected by the constant radiation of heat from its interior. For a long time, however, this idea has almost entirely vanished, and now, in Britain at all events, it is little if at all at¬ tended to, and other glacial episodes in the history of the world have continued to be brought forward and are no longer looked upon as mere ill-judged conjectures. The same kind of brecciated boulder-beds that are found in our Permian strata occur in the h otheliegende of Germany, which I have visited in several places, and believe them to have had a like glacial origin. Mr. G. W. Stow, of the Orange Free State, has of late years given most elaborate accounts of similar Permian boulder-beds in South Africa. There, great masses of moraine matter not only contain ice -scratched stones, but on the banks of rivers where the Permian rock has been removed by aqueous denudation, the underlying rocks, well rounded and mammilated, are covered by deeply in¬ cised glacier grooves pointing in a direction which at length leads the observer to the pre-Permian mountains from whence the stones were derived that formed these ancient moraines.* Messrs. Blanford and Medlicott have also given in ‘The Geology of India’ an account of boulder-beds in what they believe to be Permian strata, and which they compare with those described by me in England many years before. There the Godwana group of the Talchir strata contain numerous boulders, many of them six feet in diameter, and “in one instance some of the blocks were found to be polished and striated, and the under¬ lying Vindhyan rocks were similarly marked. The authors also correlate these glacial phenomena with those found in similar deposits in South Africa, discovered and de¬ scribed by Mr. Stow. In the Olive group of the Salt range, described by the same authors, there is a curious resemblance between a certain conglomerate “and that of the Talchir group of the Godwana system.” This “Olive conglomerate” be¬ longs to the Cretaceous series, and contains ice-trans- ported erratic boulders derived from unknown rocks, one of which of red granite “is polished and striated on three faces in so characteristic a manner that very little doubt can exist of its having been transported by ice.” One block of red granite at the Mayo Salt Mines of Khewra “is 7 feet high and 19 feet in circumference.” In the “Transition beds” of the same authors, which are sup¬ posed to be of Upper Cretaceous age, there also are boulder beds with erratic blocks of great size. I know of no evidence of glacial phenomena in Eocene strata excepting the occurrence of huge masses of included * Mr. Stow’s last memoir on this subject is still in manu¬ script. It is so exceedingly long, and the sections that ac¬ company it are of such unusual size, that the Geological Society could not afford their publication. It was thought that the Government of the Orange Free State might under¬ take this duty, but the late troubles in South Africa have orobably hindered this work — it is to be hoped only for a time. 204 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [September 4, 1880. gneiss in the strata known as Flysch in Switzerland. On this question, however, Swiss geologists are by no means agreed, and I attach little or no importance to it as afford¬ ing evidence of glacier ice. Neither do I know of any Miocene glacier- deposits ex¬ cepting those in the north of Italy near Turin, described by the late eminent geologist, Gastaldi, and which I saw under his guidance. These contain many large erratic boulders derived from the distant Alps, which, in my opinion, were then at least as lofty or even higher than they are now, especially if we consider the immense amount of denudation which they underwent during Miocene, later Tertiary, and post-Tertiary times. At a still later date there took place in the north of Europe and America what is usually misnamed “ The Glacial Epoch,” when a vast glacial mass covered all Scandinavia, and distributed its boulders across the north of Germany, as far south as the country around Leipzig, when Ireland also was shrouded in glacier ice, and when a great glacier covered the larger part of Britain, and stretched southward, perhaps nearly as far as the Thames on the one side, and certainly covered the whole of Anglesey, and probably the whole, or nearly the whole, of South Wales. This was after the advent of man. Lastly, there is still a minor glacial epoch in progress on the large and almost unknown Antarctic continent, from the high land of which in latitudes which partly lie as far north as 60® and 62°, a vast sheet of glacier-ice of great thickness extends far out to sea and sends fleets of icebergs to the north, there to melt in warmer latitudes. If in accordance with the theory of Mr. Croll, founded on astronomical data, a similar climate were transferred to the northern hemisphere, the whole of Scandinavia and the Baltic would apparently be covered with glacier-ice, and the same would probably be the case with the Faroe Islands and great part of Siberia, while even the mountain tracts of Britain might again maintain their minor systems of glaciers. . Conclusions. In opening this address, I began with the subject of the oldest metamorphic rocks that I have seen — the Lauren- tian strata. It is evident to every person who thinks on the subject that their deposition took place far from the beginning of recognized geological time. For there must have been older rocks by the degradation of which they were formed. And if, as some American geologists affirm, there are on that continent metamorphic rocks of more ancient dates than the Lauren tian strata, there must have been rocks more ancient still to afford materials for the deposition of the°e pre-Laurentian strata. Starting with the Laurentian rocks, I have shown that the phenomena of metamorphism of strata have been continued from that date all through the later formations or groups of formations down to and in eluding partof the Eocene strata in some parts of the world. In like manner I have shown that ordinary volcanic rocks have been ejected in Silurian, Devonian, Car¬ boniferous, Jurassic, Cretaceo-oolitic, Cretaceous, Eocene, Miocene, and Pliocene times, and from all that I have seen or read of these ancient volcanoes, I have no reason to believe that volcanic forces played a more important part in any period of geological time than they do in this our modern epoch. So, also, mountain chains existed before the deposition of the Silurian rocks, others of later date before the Old Red Sandstone strata were formed, and the chain of the Ural before the deposition of the Permian beds. The last great upheaval of the Alleghany Mountains took place between the close of the formation of the Car¬ boniferous strata of that region and the deposition of the New Red Sandstone. According to Darwin, after various oscillations of level, the Cordillera underwent its chief upheaval after the Cretaceous epoch, and all geologists know that the Alps the Pyrenees, the Carpathians, the Himalayas, and other mountain chains (which I have named) underwent what seems to have been their chief great upheaval after the deposition of the Eocene strata, while some of them were again lifted up several thousands of feet after the close of the Miocene epoch. The deposition of salts from aqueous solutions in inland lakes and lagoons appears to have taken place through all time— through Silurian, Devonian, Carboniferous, Permian, Triassic, Jurassic, Cretaceous, Eocene, Miocene, and Pliocene epochs — and it is going on now. In like manner fresh-water and estuarine conditions are found now in one region, now in another, throughout all the formations or groups of formations possibly from Silurian times onward ; and glacial phenomena, so far from being confined to what was and is generally still termed the glacial epoch, are now boldly declared, by independent witnesses of known high reputation, to begin with the Cambrian epoch, and to have occurred somewhere, at intervals, in various formations, from almost the earliest Palaeozoic times down to our last post-Pliocene “glacial epoch.” If the nebular hypothesis of astronomers be true (and I know of no reason why it should be doubted), the earth was at one time in a purely gaseous state, and afterwards in a fluid condition, attended by intense heat. By-and-by consolidation, due to partial cooling, took place on the surface, and as radiation of heat went on, the outer shell thickened. Radiation still going on, the interior fluid matter decreased in bulk, and, by force of gravitation the outer shell being drawn towards the interior, gave way, and, in parts, got crinkled up, and this, according to cosmogonists, was the origin of the earliest mountain chains. I make no objection to the hypothesis, which, to say the least, seems to be the best that can be offered and looks highly probable. But, assuming that it is true, these hypothetical events took place so long before authentic geological history began, as written in the rocks, that the earliest of the physical events to which I have drawn your attention in this address was, to all human apprehension of time, so enormously removed from these early assumed cosmical phenomena, that they appear to me to have been of comparatively quite modern occurrence, and to indicate that from the Laurentian epoch down to the present day, all the physical events in the history of the earth have vamed neither in kind nor in intensity from those of which we now have experience. Perhaps many of our British geologists hold similar ©pinions, but if it be so, it may not be altogether useless to have considered the various subjects separately on which I depend to prove the point I had in view. SOCIETY OF ARTS. The Chemistry of Bread-Making.* BY PROFESSOR GRAHAM, D.SC. ( Concluded from page 164.) Lecture V. I pass on now to a very interesting matter, and that is the value of bread as food, or its value as a source of power. I have here a table which we owe to the researches of Messrs. Lawes and Gilbert, showing the composition of the ordinary articles of food — meat, bacon, butter, milk, cheese, flour, bread, maize, oatmeal, rice, potatoes, vegetables, peas, and sugar. * Cantor Lectures : Delivered November and December, 1879. Reprinted from the Journal of the Society of Arts. September 4, I860.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 205 Average Composition of Articles of Food. ( Lawes and Gilbert.) Parts per 100. Dry Sub¬ stance. Carbon. Nitro¬ gen. Nitro¬ gen to 100 Carbon. Meat . 45 30 2-0 6-6 Bacon . 80 57 IT 2-0 Butter . 85 68 Milk . 10 5-4 0-5 9-3 Cheese . 60 36 4-5 12-5 Flour . 85 38 17 4-5 Bread . 64 23-5 1-3 4-5 Maize . 87 40 1*7 4-4 Oatmeal . 85 40 2-0 5-0 Rice . 87 39 1-0 2-5 Potatoes . 25 11 0-3 35 Vegetables . 15 6 0-2 33 Peas . 85 39 3-6 9-4 Sugar . 95 40 ... ••• I will not, of course, detain you by reading all these numbers, but I wish to point out to you some very interesting results obtained from a consideration of these researches. We find in the fourth column a series of numbers headed, “Ratio of nitrogen to 100 parts of car¬ bon.” In the case of wheat, it is 6'6 ; bacon, 2 ; of course in butter none ; milk, 9 '3 ; cheese, 12^ ; flour, 4| ; of course, bread is the same; rice, 2£; ordinary vegetables, 3'3 ; and so on. In sugar there is no nitrogen. In looking at this table, you will see that flour and bread stand tolerably high in the ratio of nitrogen to carbon, viz., 4^ to the 100. This leads me back again to a matter I spoke of before, viz., the question of what one should do with the bran of the wheat. Supposing a hard-working labourer, say a ditcher or a navvy, were supplied with white bread almost in sufficiency, but yet not quite, what would he crave for ? We all know, as a matter of fact and experience, and those of you who have seen men undergoing hard mecha¬ nical work will agree with me, his first craving is not for a lump of brown bread, but for a piece of fat, butter, or bacon ; but in any case the craving is not for more nitro¬ gen, but for more carbon, and.especially if that carbon be derived, not from carbo hydrates in which, as I pointed out to you, the hydrogen and oxygen are in the ratio in which they form water, but bodies such as fat, in which there is a very small proportion of oxygen, and therefore a considerable excess of hydrogen ; in other words, bodies which contain, not merely respirable carbon, but also re¬ spirable hydrogen, that is hydrogen over and above that which is required to form water with the oxygen in the compound. That is what a man craves for. If the labourer were to select cheese instead of fat, even then, in cheese, there is a considerable quantity of fat, and from the fat of the cheese he would obtain a considerable amount of heat force, vastly more than he would from the caseine of the cheese. But, probably what the great mass of working men undergoing hard work would desire most to have would be very fat meat. Those of you who may have seen navvies consuming large quantities of ex¬ cessively fat bacon, so fat that one can see no lean in it, will readily understand what. I am pointing out. And yet there is a very current notion that it is the lean of the meat that gives us the greatest amount of motive force — the greatest amount of mechanical power ; whereas, not only will a labourer in our own country, but the Chinese coolie, who lives upon rice, when he has to do a large amount of work, such as loading a ship (and it is astonish¬ ing the enormous quantity of work they can do under pressure) does not look to albuminoids in order to give him that extra power ; on the contrary, he uses butter or fat with his rice. He uses those fatty compounds that contain carbon, and contain what chemists would call potential force in the hydrogen, over and above what is required to form water with the oxygen in the compound. Let us see if science cannot explain this difference of opinion. We have the instinctive craving of the labour¬ ing classes throughout the world ; and we have certain views, which have been accepted, that lean meat, or albu¬ minoids, are the best sources of motive power. Before coming to the table, which I have here, on the mechanical equivalent of food, I think it will be convenient if I ex¬ plain to you a few numbers that are necessary to be un¬ derstood before we can consider these sources of power. According to the definition used by physicists, we say that a unit of heat is the amount of heat required to raise a gramme (= 15"432 grains) of water 1° C. If you take one gramme of pure carbon — say, the very finest charcoal — and thoroughly burn it to carbonic acid gas, the amount of heat given out by that oxidation of one gramme of carbon would be sufficientto raise 8080 grammes of water 1° C. I must apologize for using French weights and measures, but I am very much more conversant with these data in the French than in English weights and measures ; but I will afterwards put the statements in a plainer form, so that you will be better able to follow me. Now, hydrogen gives out rather more than four times as much heat as carbon. One gramme will give out as much heat, when converted into water by burning, as to raise 34,462 grammes of water 1° C. ; that is, merely considering the amount of heat-force obtained from the oxidation of carbon and hydrogen, and looking at it solely from the point of view of how much water that oxidation will warm. In order to convert this into the mechanical motion of lifting a weight against gravity, all we have to do is to make use of the data obtained by the most invaluable researches of Dr. Joule, of Man¬ chester, published some years ago, by which he determined what is called the mechanical equivalent of heat. He found, when a gramme weight was allowed to fall through 424 metres, the force thus generated being made — by proper mechanical contrivance — to agitate water, that an amount of heat was produced equal to raising the tem¬ perature of the same weight of water — that is 1 gramme — 1° C. The force obtained from a falling weight can be converted- into heat-force, and, conversely, the heat of com¬ bustion can be converted into raising a weight against gravity. Thus, a gramme of carbon, when burnt to carbonic acid gas, produces 8080 units of heat, and is, therefore, equivalent to 8080 x 424 = 3392 m&tre kilogrammes of work, or rather more than the force produced by three tons falling through one mfetre. The same weight of hydrogen, when burnt, produces more than four times as much force as carbon, and is equivalent to 144 tons falling through one mfetre. Mechanical Equivalent of Food. (In natural state as consumed.) Weight of substance One gramme ( =15 ‘432 grains). Complete oxidation. As burnt in body. Units of Heat. Mfetre kilo¬ grammes of Forces. Mbtre kilo¬ grammes of Forces. Potatoes . . . 1-013 429 422 Flour . 3-936 1669 1627 Oatmeal .... 4 000 1696 1665 Rice . 3-813 1615 1591 Lean Beef . . . 1-567 664 604 Beef Fat .... 9 069 3841 3841 Cheshire Cheese . 4-647 1969 1846 Now, these data being explained, I will proceed to consider the motive force obtained from the various sources of food we make use of, and, thanks to the re- 206 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [September 4, i860 searches of Yoit, Pettenkoffer, Bischoff, and others abroad, and Playfair, Edward Smith, Frankland, and others in our own country, this matter has been made very clear. In the experiments of Frankland, by which he determined, by very well-known methods, the heat of combustion, not merely of carbon and hydrogen — that had been done before — but the heat of combustion of lean meat — that is, to say, meat deprived of fat by digestion in ether — fat meat, rice, potatoes, starch, and so on, he found that the heat of combustion of fat was rather more than six times that obtained from the same weight of lean. I am not using the word “lean’’ in the sense that you and I do, where we speak of a lean beefsteak as having no fat in it — a lean beef steak contains a good deal of fat — but the lean meat deprived of fat by proper chemical means. He found that fat can develop more than six times as much heat as the same weight of lean. Now, Dr. Frankland, in carry¬ ing out these researches, determined not merely the absolute amount of heat-force obtained, but the amount of force obtained by carbo-hydrate, from fat, and from albuminoid matters, when used by man. Albuminoids are not burnt up to carbonic acid and ammonia ; they are eliminated chiefly as urea, slightly as uric acid, and, in birds and reptiles particularly, a considerable quantity is eliminated in the less oxidized form of uric acid. By making a deduction from these determinations of the eliminated urea, the result of his researches was that the fats yielded a very large amount of force compared with the albuminoids — as I said before, about six times as much. Two German chemists— Messrs. Fick and Wisld- cenus — experimented upon this matter. They carefully and most accurately weighed everything they ate, and accurately determined the excrete products, the carbonic acid, and so on. They found that, in going up the Faul- horn, which is 10,000 feet high, they burnt 37 grammes of their muscles. Now, according to the researches of Frankland, this 37 grammes of muscle was only equivalent to 68,000 mhtre kilogrammes of force ; whereas, the total amount of force expended in going up a mountain of that height was 319,000 metre kilogrammes — leaving a defi¬ ciency, therefore, 251,000 metre kilogrammes. This was en¬ tirely due to the fat and the carbo-hydrates they consumed, and not due to the oxidation of their own muscles. From the researches of these gentlemen, and those of Playfair, upon labourers, and of Haughton, who experimented upon soldiers undergoing shot drill, and Dr. Edward Smith, who experimented not only upon individuals undergoing the treadmill, but who also worked the treadmill himself, and also from the work of Dr. Frankland, we now know that the heat of combustion we obtain, and the amount of force we generate, is due chiefly, not to the nitrogenous, but to the non-nitrogenous parts of our food. This is not all. As the work done increases in severity, it is not the nitrogenous compound urea that increases, but it is the carbonic acid gas which increases in the eliminated products of combustion. The greater amount of work done in a given unit of time, the greater is the amount of carbonic acid produced. Dr. Smith, in experimenting upon himself, found that, when he was sleeping, he elimi¬ nated 19 grammes of carbonic acid gas per hour from his lungs. It was carefully quantified and weighed. When sitting, 29 grammes were eliminated ; when walking 2 miles an hour, 70 grammes ; 3 miles an hour, 100 grammes ; when ascending the treadmill, at the rate of 28J feet per second, it amounted to 190 grammes per hour. Then, you may say, granting that the carbonic acid increases the more work is done, whereas the urea increases but little, what func¬ tion does the muscle perform in the system? The function that the muscle performs is precisely the same as the piston-rod, together with the machinery, play in the ordi¬ nary locomotive. You know that the function of the piston-rod of a locomotive is to convert heat from the oxidation of the coke or coal — which, of course, operates in changing water into steam — into a motion of the mass ; so that, in that way, by burning fuel, you can drive a train at 50 or 60 miles an hour. Precisely similar is the function of the muscle in the human system ; it is the apparatus by which the heat produced from the oxidation of the carbo hydrates and of the fat is converted into mechanical motion — into the motion, not merely of the pulsation of the heart and other internal mechanical work, but the motion of the body in walking, or running, or climbing hills, and other mechanical work. There is this difference, however, between the muscle and the piston- rod; not merely the piston-rod, but all parts of the engine are carefully constructed by the engineer, so as to avoid what is technically termed “hot bearings ” ; in other words, there must be no local production of heat by friction in any part of the engine. There is this difference, then, that the muscle is partly oxidized and broken up, but the amount of heat obtained from the oxidation of the muscle is only converted into mechanical motion in about the ratio of one third of the total heat produced, two thirds going to heat the body, and only one third going to pro¬ duce mechanical motion. We are indebted for these re¬ searches to Heidenheim and others. To take a more practical view of this question, one that will be more readily understood by most of you, I will take some of Dr. Frankland’s results upon the heat of combustion produced by oxidizing various articles of food. Supposing we were to take the average of all persons present in this room, and assume we are all 10 stone weight (140 lbs.), and if we wished to go up 10,000 feet against gravity, what amount of force should we require? I could have given you the quantity in metre kilogrammes of force, as I have already done, but let us see what amount of money it would cost in the form of different kinds of food, in order to do that amount of mechanical work. Weight and Cost of Food required to raise 140 lbs. 10,000 feet high. Weight in lbs. required. Cost per lb. in pence. Total cost “ in pence. Potatoes .... 5 1 5 Flour . 14 3 4 Bread . 2i 2 4| Oatmeal . u 2| 3| Rice . lg 4 54 Lean of Beef . 34 12 42 Beef Fat . 4 10 5 Cheshire Cheese .... H 10 12 On this table we have the number of lbs. required, of different kinds of ordinary food, to produce this amount of mechanical work. If we take potatoes ; we find 5 lbs. of potatoes would be required, and if we consider them as costing lc?. per lb., it will cost 5 d. You will readily understand that the last column, which gives the value of the articles, will vary from time to time. Of flour we should only require 1^ lb., which is taken at about 3d. per lb., and this would, therefore, only cost id. Bread would cost 4 the difference is due, doubtless, to the expense of the process of making bread. In the case of lean beef, deprived of fat, 34 lbs. are required, and as the cost of very lean beef is taken at Is. per lb., that would cost 3s. 6(7., whereas the fat would only cost 5 d., because so small a quantity as 4 lb. would do the work which 34 lbs. of lean beef would do ; 1£ lb. of Cheshire cheese would be required, which, assuming the price to be 10c?. per lb., would cost Is. to do that amount of mechanical work. Of course, this table is merely suggestive, but you see perfectly well that man does not require a large quan¬ tity of albuminoids in doing heavy work. I told you that bread contains a very fair ratio of nitrogen to carbon, and that, when considered from another point of view — the mechanical work capable of being done by the use of such food materials — that, September 4, 1380.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 207 really, the money spent upon flour is not at all badly laid out ; whereas, on the other hand, if you wish to have a large quantity of work done in a short time, then, in addition to bread, we require, not to use much nitro¬ genous matter, but rather to use fat, and, therefore, the peasants, not merely of England, but of all countries have been right, in spite of many scientific assertions that they were wrong, in their instinctive habit, of adding fat, rather than nitrogenous food, to their diet when under¬ going hard work. At a former meeting, I said I would again revert to the subject of bran; in doing so now, I wish it to be distinctly understood that, in my criticism against the admixture of bran with flour, I have been anxious to defend the miller from the charges of being ignorant of true scientific principles. I hold that the miller who so well mills his flour as to eliminate all bran is the man who is working on true scientific principles. His object is to enable the baker to produce a fine, well-piled loaf, not a sodden, heavy one. I think it is right I should suggest a method by which wheaten flour may be used, and yet not produce the injurious effects which I told you finely-ground bran, with its cerealin, produces in the panification process. This is to do what I suggested at the last meeting should be done with inferior flours, namely, to make the ferment and the sponge of really good, strong flour, and then, in the dough process, when it is so much stiffer, and where the whole operation only lasts one hour, to use the wheaten flour. Of course, you are perfectly well aware that hydrochloric acid and bi¬ carbonate of soda are sometimes used for raising wheaten bread, but I am suggesting this other plan for those who prefer a fermented loaf, and yet wish to avoid the high- coloured products and sodden bread, formed by the action of the finely-ground bran on this flour during the many hours of the ferment and sponge stages, and who desire that the fermented loaf of whole meal shall be light and porous. I have, at last, come to the conclusion, and I will briefly recapitulate what, it seems to me, have been the prominent features of our study together. In the first place, you will remember, we studied in some detail the properties of the different constituents of the cereals, giving, of course, more especial weight to wheat. Secondly, we found that climatic conditions have a most important bearing upon the nature of those constituents, and then, thirdly, we considered together the right mode of treating such wheats by the miller, and, subsequently, by the baker. Lastly, we saw the necessity of micro¬ scopic examination of the yeast, in order to be sure that we were not introducing into our fermenting process organisms of disease producing acetic acid, lactic acid, butyric acid, and other injurious products. These, perhaps, have been the chief points, though, at the same time, there have been several others which have occupied our attention for some time. I have now only to say that, if I have succeeded in awakening an interest in the wonderful phenomena con¬ nected with the art of bread-making, and have raised in your minds a true conception of the high importance and dignity of the art — based, as we have seen it to be, on some of the most interesting departments of physical, chemical and biological science — and if I have stimulated any of you to resolve on the further study of these sciences, whereby greater and more rapid progress may be made, I shall rejoice that my efforts have not alto¬ gether failed. |)arfkmentarg mitr ITafo ^xomVm^ Poisoning by Prussic Acid. We regret to notice the sudden death, on Wednesday last week, of Mr. H. J. Hey wood, a medical practitioner of Pendleton, where he had a large practice. It appears that the deceased had for years suffered much from indi¬ gestion, and had been in the habit of taking laudanum to relieve pain and induce sleep. Early on Wednesday morning his wife was awakened by hearing a fall, and found her husband on the floor, unconscious, with a prussic acid bottle in his hand ; and he died shortly afterwards, an attempt to administer an emetic having proved unsuccessful. Evidence given at the inquest showed that he kept a bottle of laudanum and one of prussic acid side by side on the same shelf, and that he had inadvertently taken the prussic acid instead of the laudanum. If a medical man can act in such a way, who can wonder if non-professional persons, nurses or patients, are now and then wanting in due carefulness ? — Medical Times and Gazette, August 28. gispeitsiirjj tJTeworanb^ In order to assist as much as possible our younger brethren, for whose sake pa/rtly this column was established, considerable latitude is allowed, according to promise, in the propounding of supposed difficulties. But the right will be exercised of excluding too trivial questions, or re¬ petitions of those that have been previously discussed in principle. And we would suggest that those who meet with difficulties should before sending them search previous members of the Journal to see if they can obta/in the re- quired information. [442]. Hydrarg. iodid. is a preparation of the London Pharmacopoeia; its synonym in the British Pharma¬ copoeia is hyd. iodid. viride. The ointment should be as follows : — B Hyd. Iodid. . . 1 part. Cerse Alb . 2 parts. Adipis Praep . 6 parts. To the wax and lard melted together add the iodide and mix well. “374.” Dates mtir (Queries. [672]. STORM AND WEATHER GLASS.— Take a clean salad oil flask, half fill it with water, invert it in a wide-mouthed bottle full of water, taking care that the water does not escape from the flask. The water will rise for fine weather and sink for wet. A little per¬ manganate of potash dissolved in the water will look very effective. “374.” [673]. PASTILLE. — Can any of your readers inform me what is mixed with conf. rosse, to form the pastille, now unobtainable, formerly used in Turkey for lighting the chibouque ? A. G. Beaven. [674]. IVORY STAINING. — Can any of your readers inform me of the best process for permanently staining ordinary white ivory, to the natural yellowish brown colour of African ivory, having what is called the bark on ? Sheffield. [675]. INJECTIO MORPHLE TARTRATIS— I want to prepare a solution of above, containing one grain in twelve minims. By precipitating the alkaloid from a solution of its salt, well washing, and dissolving by means of a solution of tartaric acid I get a solution from which very insoluble crystals are eventually thrown down. The solution I get from the London houses never deposits in any way. Can any one explain this and give 208 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [September 4, i860. a form for working by ? Any person doing so will very greatly oblige S. H. P. [676]. PREVENTIVE OF SEA-SICKNESS.— I should feel obliged if you will ask, through the Journal, if any member will oblige with a formula for “a sea¬ sickness preventive.” J. J. Matthias. COLOURS FOR SHOP WINDOWS. — A very beau¬ tiful amethystine colour can be produced by dissolving 5 grains of salicylic acid in a little solution of ammonia, mixing this with two gallons or enough water to fill the show bottle. To this is added a few drops of solution of chloride of iron, and afterwards a few drops of muriatic acid. Emerald-green colour, of great beauty, can readily be produced by dissolving a few five cent nickel pieces in equal parts of nitric acid and water, then diluting with sufficient water. A GOOD FILLING FOR TEETH.— A filling that has been used very successfully for teeth, and which is next to gold leaf in permanency, is made of the following ingredients : — R Oxide of Zinc (recently made by burning) . 200 parts. Powdered Silica . 8 „ „ Borate of Soda ... 4 „ „ Glass . 5 „ Mix and pass through a very fine sieve. To be kept in a well stoppered bottle. When required for use, a little of the powder is mixed quickly with a concentrated solution of chloride of zinc, so as to make a thick paste, which is pressed into the cavity of the tooth, and will harden in less than ten minutes. It forms a hard white cement, which will last for years. COSMETIC POMADE can be made by the following formula : — White Wax . 4^ ozs. avoir. Lard . 4f „ „ Balsam of Peru . 1 drachm. Oil of Orange Flowers ... 30 drops. „ Lavender . 5 „ „ Cloves . 6 „ „ Rosemary . 5 „ Melt the lard, wax and balsam, and stir them con¬ stantly until they thicken, when the oils are added. This is then poured into moulds ; when cold, wrap up each stick in wax paper and tinfoil. Black stick pomade is made by mixing 40 grains of best lampblack, carefully rubbed up with a portion of the lard. Brown, by using burnt sienna in same way, and various shades of brown, by mixing burnt sienna with lamp¬ black. CAMPHORATE OF AMMONIA.— This salt is easily produced by neutralizing camphoric acid with liq. ammonia fortior, evaporating by a very moderate heat until reduced to a syrupy liquid, and a pellicle begins to form, when it is set aside in a cool place to crystallize. It is a beautifully crystalline salt, consisting of masses of crystals, radiating from central points, arranged in the most symmetrical manner. It is a salt that has sedative properties resembling the monobromide of camphor, but, unlike that compound, it is freely soluble in water. The dose is from 5 to 10 grains. Erratum, — Page 166, second column, line 31. For “ Then pour off the clear liquor, and a little creasote to prevent mouldiness,” read “Then pour off the clear liquor and add a little creasote to prevent mouldiness. “374.” No notice can be taken of anonymous communica¬ tions. Whatever is intended for insertion must be authenti¬ cated by the name and address of the writer; not necessarily for publication , but as a guarantee of good faith. Assistants in the South op France. Sir, — If Mr Weddell bases his protest against my letter on personal experience, I must remind him that in one short season he can hardly have had the opportunities that nearly six years have afforded me of knowing the treatment assistants sometimes meet with. I can easily understand that being still under the charm of his first season spent in a good southern pharmacy he sees “tout en rose” and resents the idea that gloomy colours can possibly exist in so charming a climate ; but let him only take the trouble of inquiring of those who have lived in the several places referred to, and he will find that what I advance is perfectly correct. My object was not to create a prejudice against employers in the south generally, far from it, but simply to state fact3 and offer a word of advice to those whom it might serve; had Mr. Weddell had more experience of the littoral he would certainly corroborate, instead of disputing my statements. Paris. H. Bouttell. Sir, — I trust that having perused-Mr. Weddell’s letter in your last issue no assistant will be led to think too lightly of home situations and comforts and be eager to relinquish them for the doubtful advantages offered by a few months’ sojourn in the “sunny south.” Taking into consideration the fact that these engagements extend only over a season of from five to eight months, the extra expense incurred by an imperfect knowledge of the language and customs of the country, and the probable loss of time and expenditure at the close of the season — it is unquestionable that a good average permanency in England is better in a pecuniary sense. It is not necessary to seek in France the “gentlemanly respect” or “liberty of action and judgment” which your correspondent appears to think is not prevalent in English pharmacies. Reasonable assistants can always find the former and capable men the latter quality among English employers, and probably with the accom¬ paniment of a greater amount of genuineness. The experience gained by a few months in a foreign pharmacy is often of great use in the future, but it is the unanimous opinion of those who have “gone south” for successive seasons that “ it does net pay.” Mr. Weddell concludes his letter by saying, “So attached does he (the English assistant) frequently become to the business, to the proprietor, to the customers, and to the gentle clime, that he can hardly bring himself afterwards to settle again in England.” This I take to be as undesire- able a thing as could happen to assistants who have prospects of establishing themselves in business in their own country. Fred. J. Bathe. Coumarin in Species of Orchis. Sir, — In reply to Mr. Druce’s inquiry as to whether Orchis fusca contains coumarin, I have found that in drying this species in quantity it gives off an almost unbearably strong smell of this substance, far more than Anthoxanthum odoratum or any other plant with which I am acquainted. I may also mention that Orchis uslulata develops the same smell, though in a somewhat less degree. Frederick J. Hanbury. F. H. Alcock is thanked for his communication. C. W. Nighton. — Spergula arvensis. M. I. — Parnassia palustris. H. J. H. — We are not aware of the existence of such a work. T. C. A. — A recipe for inseparable lime juice and glyce¬ rine was repeated in vol. ix„, p. 1032. _ Communications, Letters, etc. have been received from Messrs. Wills and Wootton, Oswald, Wighton, W. J Smith, Suburban Chemist, G. W. September 11, 1880.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 209 PREPARATION OF IODINE-IRON COD LIVER OIL. BY S. DRAISMA VON VALAENBURG. Being' invited by tbe Rotterdam Department of the Dutch Pharmaceutical Society to make the manner in which I prepare my iodine-iron cod liver oil public, a thing which I had often thought of, but different circumstances had up till now prevented me from carrying out, I herewith present to the public the following prescription : — R Iodii . part L25 Eerri pulverati . . 2*50 01. jecor. aselli . . 98-50 The iodine is thrown into a vessel filled with cod liver oil, and by constant stirring or shaking for some days made entirely to dissolve into it, so that the liquid when left for some time to itself has a specific weight of 0-932—0-937 at 13-5°— 21° C. The solution is now poured in a vessel which is hermetically shut, and brought into contact with iron by shaking or stirring it with this ingredient for some four hours, until it gets a purple-violet colour, and after a due shaking with solution of iodetum kalicum and diluted starch has lost the power to produce a reaction on free iodine. The liquid must now stand quietly for twenty- four hours (the vessel must be carefully shut, and nearly full), then shaken again for an hour at least, till it has been proved, after again shaking with a little iodetum kalicum amylum solution (also after twenty-four hours) that the preparation is wholly exempt from free iodium, may easily be made an emulsion, and consequently remain con¬ stant. The mixture must now stand till it appears clear, and one must make sure by specific weight and analysis that the desired combination has taken place. The oil should be conserved in well corked bottles, filled to the top and of yellow-coloured glass, which must have as little surface exposed to the air as is possible. The bottles are supposed to be emptied in five days ; scrupulous investigations have brought to light, that in this space the air can produce but a very trifling change in the oil. The mixture must be of a purple-violet colour, and should have a specific weight of 0-937 — 0 940 at 8°— 13°. It should contain 1-23 per cent, of iodine and about 0-27 per cent, of iron, both in a chemically combined condition. The mixture will become of a darker colour and the quantity of iron greater as the air has had more time to form iron oxy- iodide. Nothing of an iodine reaction must be observed" when the mixture is shaken with diluted starch, not even if to the latter should be added a solution of kalium iodide. The addition of kalium iodide, which seizes the free iodine that might be in the oil greatly enhances the sensibility of the amylum re¬ action. I prepare my cod liver oil in quantities of 800 to 1000 litres in a vessel that is provided with a stirring apparatus, and several cocks placed in gradual eleva¬ tions. The vessel must be of iron, and capable of being shut hermetically. During the preparation, samples of the oil, of the iodine solution, and of the iodine-iron solution are sent to Professor Van der Third Series, No. 533. Burg, and not before he has tested them, is the opera¬ tion proceeded with. In large quantities French iodine is, in my opinion, to be preferred above English iodine. The latter is finer and consequently mixed itself easily with the oil to a tough mass, which cannot be resolved again but with great difficulty. In small quantities the solution of the iodine may be considerably quick¬ ened by pulverizing the iodine in a mortar. A long shaking with iron ought not to be omitted in this case. Though apparently all the iodine is dissolved to a clear liquid, close investi¬ gations have shown that, especially with large quantities, small parts of a dark coloured matter will adhere to the bottom of the vessel, from which no shaking or stirring can remove them. This matter is insoluble in ether. It may be nearly completely burnt. The eye, with the aid of a microscope, can detect no crystallization. This circumstance probably explains why the iodine- iron cod liver oil is of a finer taste and odour than the original oil. That the mixture after its purity has been tested, shows a free iodine reaction when it has stood for twenty-four hours, finds its explanation in the fact that a small quantity of ferrid-iodide seems to have been produced which soon decomposes itself into ferro-iodide and iodine. The violet colour owes its origin to the small particles of ferrid- oxyiodide, which can hardly be avoided but by a very careful removal of the air during the shaking with iron. A preparation that should be totally free of ferrid- oxyiodide is not the thing that is desired. Then, being a little darker coloured than the oil which was used, it obtains immediately after it has been brought into contact with the air the peculiar dark violet colour, and may be used as a sensible charac¬ teristic reagent for oxygen. Without taking this precaution, the quantity of the oxyiodide combination will amount to very little (though sufficient for the colour), if the preparation • has been gone through with due care. Analysis will sufficiently show this. The oxidizable properties of the mixture will become evident if a drop is exposed to the air on the lid of a cup. At once the colour will change, while, at last, the liquid will have a colour little darker than the original oil. If the drop is made to spread by strongly blowing upon it, the above reaction will appear much more quickly, on account of the higher temperature as well as the vapour of water of the breath. It is very remarkable that water will spoil the mixture. We once had to ascribe the loss of about 10 tuns to this cause. This influence of water may be easily shown. If 1 drop of water is shaken up with about 10 grams of the oil in a well corked bottle, great changes will soon be observed in the colour. The water seems to rob the oil of the ferro-iodide for some part, and for the other to decompose it by mutual influence. It is still noteworthy that the quantity of iron was larger than was absolutely necessary, because this quickens the combination. Exact investigations, made expressly for this pur¬ pose, have clearly shown that the cod liver oil which is prepared with the due observances remains constant. 210 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [September 11, 1SS0. ARALIA SPINOSA, OR FALSE PRICKLY ASH BARK.* BY LOUIS H. HOLDEN. The striking difference of the physical characteristics between the barks of false and true prickly ask (Xa n- thoxylum) lies in the appearance of the spines and the fracture of the bark. The former presents spines which are quite numerous compared with the latter ; they are about one-fourth inch in length, are smooth, slender and tapering to a fine point ; their base is round or oval, and arranged in trans¬ verse rows. The latter bark has few spines, scattered irregularly ; they are straight and of the same length, but two-edged, with narrow linear base of about three-fourths inch in length. The false bark breaks with a rather tough but nearly smooth fracture. The true is brittle, and breaks with a short, non- fibrous fracture. In examining the bark the following is the result of my analysis : — Having reduced the drug to a coarse powder, it was moistened with alcohol and packed in a percolator, ex¬ hausted with alcohol, the alcohol was removed by dis¬ tillation, and the residue evaporated to a solid extract. The extract was mixed with alcohol to the consistency of syrup, then treated with benzin, which removed the fatty matter ; this fat is of a dark green colour, which is probably due to chlorophyll. The residue was then treated with ether repeatedly, until the portion insoluble in ether, after being dissolved in water, would not answer the tests for tannin. On examination, I find ether has removed from the extract all of the tannin and resin. Upon evaporating the ethereal solution to dryness and washing the re¬ sidue with water, the tannin becomes separated from the resin. The tannin is precipitated from aqueous solution by acetate of lead ; it gives an emerald-green colour with salts of iron ; with caustic potash it turns ruby-red ; the latter colour, when acted upon by oxalic acid, is de¬ stroyed. The tannin coagulates albumen ; it is an as¬ tringent, soluble in ether, alcohol and water. The alcoholic extract cannot be detannated with oxide of lead, which the following process will prove. The alco¬ holic extract was mixed with water ; on adding to this oxide of lead, heating, allowing to stand for several days, then evaporating slowly to dryness, mixing again with water and filtering, then adding fresh oxide of lead and allowing to stand for two months, it still answered to tests for tannin. The residue from the ethereal solution, after washing with water, was found to be resin. It is a brown opaque mass ; powdered, it is of a light brown colour, solid, brittle, fusible, and volatilized by a high heat ; it is slightly acrid, soluble in alcohol and ether, insoluble in water, benzin and chloroform. The residue from the alcoholic extract, after being treated with benzin and ether, is entirely soluble in water, from which it is precipitated by acetate of lead in the form of a heavy yellow adherent mass, which carries down mechanically the bitter principle; this can be sepa¬ rated by washing with alcohol. Upon evaporation, a lightish yellow substance, in scale, is obtained, which from the following experiments was proved to be a glu- coside ; to this the name of araliin is given. Its solution has no effect on litmus. It is soluble in alcohol and dilute acetic acid, very soluble in water, foaming exces¬ sively upon agitation, and the froth being quite persistent ; not soluble in benzin, chloroform or ether. Acetate lead has no effect upon its solution ; no precipitate is produced by platinic chloride or bichloride of mercury ; no action by nitric acid and chromate potash, nor does it answer to any of the tests for alkaloids. Hydrochloric acid bleaches the araliin and develops the peculiar odour of the plant ; the effect of sulphuric acid is similar. Potas¬ sium hydrate and ammonia have no effect. Upon dissolving araliin in water acidulated with hy¬ drochloric acid, and upon boiling, a white, insoluble, tasteless and odourless precipitate is formed, for which I propose the name araliretin. After filtering, testing filtrate for glucose by cupric sulphate and excess of caustic potash, and boiling, a heavy precipitate of red oxide of copper is formed, showing the bitter principle to be a glucoside. Araliin boiled with potassio-cupric tartrate produced precipitate of red oxide of copper, confirming the preceding test. When araliin is boiled with hydrate potash an amber colour is produced. Upon addition of tannic acid in cold solution no change takes place, but upon the application of heat a flocculent precipitate is formed. THE CONDITIONS NECESSARY TO SUCCESSFULLY CONDUCT PERCOLATION.* BY J. U. LLOYD, CINCINNATI, OHIO. ( Concluded from page 196.) If we close the exit of our percolator at any time during the progress of percolation the menstruum within the percolator will necessarily cea3e to move bodily downward. The liquid will thus remain in direct contact with the material, and as a consequence the act of solution will progress in a manner similar to that exemplified by our example of the dissolving crystal of bromide of potassium. Hence, it is evident that .no other advantage than those resulting from longer con¬ tinued contact can arise. To guard against any dis¬ turbing influence affecting succeeding percolation, caused by an unequal contraction of the only partially saturated powder, it is to be observed that all particles of material are equally and permanently surrounded by menstruum. We must bear in mind that the action of the menstruum upon the powdered material in the percolator, which consists of a number of small fragments, and that upon the single crystal of bromide of potassium, in the example cited heretofore, differ only in degree ; its solvent power affects alike all the molecules exposed to its influence, and the relative difference is dependent solely upon the difference of the areas of surface exposed to contact. In fact, the term molecule implies no definite idea of size, and is an expression applying to something beyond our senses ; we cannot compare the molecules of a liquid to particles of matter of any conceivable size. We are forced to assume that a menstruum is made up of an inconceivably large number of infinitely small particles, which we consider capable of permeating the powder within the percolator, finding its way through the capillary channels which surround the particles of the solid, circulating around them in obedience to laws already considered, and according to influences yet to be mentioned. During the process of maceration in the percolator the capillary tubes, as well as the larger in¬ terstices, are supposed to be filled with liquid; if this liquid be capable of dissolving wholly or partially the solid solution must take place. Each successive move¬ ment of contact is found to decrease the quantity of matter held in solution until the liquid is saturated or the solid dissolved. Thus we find the effect of contact in percolation to be identical with that in simple maceration. In percolation, from the instant the stratum of men¬ struum commences to penetrate the material until it * From the American Journal of Pharmacy, August, 1880. * From the ‘ Proceedings of the American Pharma-. ceutical Association/ vol. xxvii., 1879. September 11, 1880.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 211 escapes we have maceration connected with alteration of the position of the mass of the liquid. There are continually new surfaces of contact formed as the liquid passes downward towards the exit of the percolator, and in maceration this phenomenon is also presented. There is no rest within the vessel while solution progresses. Mediums of greater specific gravity than the original menstruum are constantly forming, which, obedient to gravity, seek the lowest portion of the vessel, in turn to be displaced by heavier liquids. In this way during maceration numbers of percolating currents are flowing throughout the capillaries, and between the interstices of the material, as in percolation, while fresh portions of liquid are continually coming into contact with new surfaces, and saturations are giving way with perfect regularity to those not saturated. Thus cii’culation of currents progress and will continue until an equilibrium is established, as long as there is soluble matter and unsaturated menstruum within the percolator, and afterwards whenever the temperature is permitted to change. Therefore maceration cannot be disconnected from percolation, and as we have seen per¬ colation must include maceration. And thus I am led to understand that the contact of maceration and the contact of percolation are identical. Reasoning from the foregoing it may be argued that the expression, macera¬ tion in connection with percolation, is simply an expres¬ sion to imply prolonged contact of liquid with material, by which means we may overcome a defective contact of height of material within the percolator. Upon the other hand, increase of height of powder may imply prolonged maceration of the material with successive portions of menstruum. I think we may be justified in arguing that the in¬ fluences which modify contact are of vital interest in the study of percolation; that the solvent action of a percolating menstruum may be facilitated by judicious maceration, or by increasing the perpendicular height of the powder. Let us now consider the vessel which contains the ma¬ terial known as the percolator. This is of the utmost importance, as the increase and decrease of diameter governs capacity, subservient to mathematical laws, which it is necessary to examine. The percolator controls the height of powder under like pressure. As the diameter of the percolator de¬ creases it is responded to by greater, and as it increases by less height, both of powder and menstruum. Thus, if a cylindrical percolator be 6 inches in diameter, and a given amount of liquid or powder occupy a height of 6 inches, the same material will occupy — 131 inches in height in a percolator 4 inches in diameter. 24 » ji j> 3 fj ;> 54 ,, t) )> 2 „ „ This is in conformity with the mathematical law that the height of both liquid and powder increase inversely as the square of the diameter of the percolator ; a rule, however, which does not apply to the increase and decrease of the resultant contact between the material and passing liquid, as a more careful examination will illustrate. Let us represent contact by numbers. If a cylindrical or prismatic percolator be used which has been filled 1 inch with a powder, overlying which is alcohol to the depth of an inch, it is evident that every particle of the powder which assists to form any perpendicular line or column of the powder an inch in height will be exposed to and come into contact, with every collection of mole¬ cules in the line or column of alcohol perpendicular above, providing the alcohol passes directly through the powder from top to bottom. If we knew the number of particles of powder and the number of molecules of alcohol in their respective columns, by multiplying the numbers together the pi'oduct would represent the individual contacts between particles and molecules. As before remarked we cannot calculate the number of molecules in a given bulk, therefore we will simply call the inch of alcohol and the inch of powder one, and thus by multi¬ plying one by one we have the product one, which we will take as unity. If the powder be 2 inches in depth and the alcohol be 1, or if the alcohol be 2 inches in depth and the powder 1, the contact will be twice as great (2x1 = 2), and may be represented by two. If both are 2 inches in depth, the contact will be (2x2 = 4) twice as great as the last, or four times that of the first, and may be represented by four, and so on. Let us now take a percolator, and apply the foregoing law of increase of contact. Eor the sake of obtaining even numbers we will consider a square prism instead of a cylinder, as the principle applies alike to either, although in practice cylindrical percolators are employed. The area of the base of a square prism 16 inches in diameter is 16 x 16 or 256 square inches. If a powder properly moistened for percolation be placed in it to the depth of 1 inch, above which rests an inch of alcohol, there will be 256 cubic inches of each layer, and yet being taken as unity when the alcohol has passed through the powder the contact will be 1x1 = 1, and thus the contact may only be represented by one. If a square prism 8 inches in diameter be considered, the area of the base wfll be 64 square inches. If filled with powder to the depth of 1 inch, over which rests an inch in depth of alcohol, each layer will contain 64 cubic inches of material, or one-fourth the amount required to fill the 16-inch percolator 1 inch in depth. The 8-inch per¬ colator would therefore have to contain 4 inches in depth of each alcohol and powder before the amount (256 cubic inches) could be reached. Thus the contact will be 4 x 4 = 16. A prism 4 inches in diameter must be filled 16 inches in depth with both alcohol and powder to contain 256 Cubic inches of each material. The contact will conse¬ quently be 16 x 16 = 256. Thus continuing our calcu¬ lations, we have the following table which expresses the contact between material and liquid, in each instance the percolator below being one-half the diameter of that above : — Percolator 16 inches in diameter, alcohol and powder each 1 inch deep, contact, 1. Percolator 8 inches in diameter, alcohol and powder each 4 inches deep, contact, 16. Percolator 4 inches in diameter, alcohol and powder each 16 inches deep, contact, 256. Percolator 2 inches in diameter, alcohol and powder each 64 inches deep, contact, 4096 . Percolator 1 inch in diameter, alcohol and powder each 256 inches deep, contact, 65,536. It will be seen that with the percolator 1 inch in diameter there will be 65,536 times as much contact between alcohol and powder, inch for inch, as in the 16 -inch percolator. Thus we find that whereas the height of both liquid and powder increases inversely as the square of the diameter of the percolator, the contact between liquid and powder increases inversely as the fourth power of the diameter of the percolator. As we follow a line of experiments, the solution or partial solution of one problem brings us face to face with others. Thus we are led onward, and the more thorough our study of the present, the more important we find it to carefully note the future. The utmost caution is necessary in studying nature’s laws, lest from insufficient data we hastily generalize. The foregoing argument regarding the laws of contact is undoubtedly as accurate, from a theoretical view, as those of the mathe¬ matical increase and decrease of the capacity of the per¬ colator. In practice, however, the advantage derived from increased contact of height between liquid and powder, is not by any means as great as the foregoing calculations indicate, and as our tables have shown. Counteracting agencies overcome to a very great extent the theoretical advantages contact should afford. Some of these influences we have been led to consider, others 212 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [September 11, I860. have yet to be mentioned. Let us not forget that every effect has a cause, that variations in the result of perco¬ lations are due to the working of natural laws. We shall now consider the material to be exhausted, of which the United States Pharmacopoeia speaks as fol¬ lows : — “As different degrees of fineness are necessary in powders, according to their nature and mode of treat¬ ment, the special degree required is designated in the several formulas. Por this purpose the terms very fine, fine, moderately fine, moderately coarse and coarse are used; the powder passed through a sieve of eighty or more meshes to the linear inch, being designated as very fine ; through one of sixty meshes, fine ; through one of fifty meshes, moderately fine ; through one of forty meshes, moderately coarse; and through one of twenty meshes, coarse.” Seven articles, coarsely ground, moistened, and packed in two different sized percolators, during the month of January, and allowed to macerate forty -eight hours, then drawn in stream size of pin until liquid ceased to pass. Temperature averaged 38° F. Table 1. Per- Height CO- Menstruum. of ma- late. terial. Coarse Ground. lb. No. In. Mayapple root . . . 12 10 Alcohol. 10 Leptandra . . . . 12 9 Alcohol. 134 Hydrastis . . . . 8 8 Alcohol. 124 Hamamelis leaves . . 5 7 j Alcohol 3. ) | Water 2. \ 164 Mayapple root . . . 5 3 { Alcohol 3. ) l Water 2. j 234 Hydrastis . . . . 5 4 j Alcohol 3. ) j Water 2. ( 21 Aletris . 4 5 Alcohol. 184 Amnt. used to moisten ma¬ terial. Men¬ struum added. Amount of perco¬ late ob¬ tained. Absorbed by the ma¬ terial and lost by eva¬ poration. Dry ex¬ tractive matter con¬ tained in 1 c.c. Amount of ex¬ tractive matter con¬ tained in 1 fl. oz. Amount of ex- trective matter contain¬ ed in 16 fl. oz. Pts. Pts. Pts. fl. oz. Pts. fl. oz. Gr. Gr. Gr. 3 12 11 8 3 8 •41 12-095 193-52 3 12 9 14 5 2 1-00 29-5 472-16 2 12 9 11 4 5 •41 .12 095 193-52 4 19 14 13 8 3 1‘22 35-99 575-84 1 9 5 14 4 2 1-75 51-625 826-00 2 8 5 8 4 8 1*84 54-28 868-48 2 8 6 9 3 7 •70 20-65 330-40 Like amounts of material were at the same time, from the same source, nicely wrapped and placed in a dry situation until August, then percolated, each article being worked in the percolator used in January for the corresponding part. The same amount of men¬ struum was used for moistening each individual article, and in every way precautions were taken to render the two lines of experiments as nearly as possible alike. The result is tabulated under : — Table 2. Amount of 'Amount of Amount of dry extrac- dry extrac- dry extrac- tive matter tive matter tive matter contained contained contained in 1 c.c. of in 1 fl. oz. in 16 fl. oz. tincture, of tincture, of tincture, obtained obtained obtained from the from the from the reserved reserved reserved part of part of part of materials materials materials percolated percolated percolated in August. in August. in August. Coarse Ground. Gr. Gr. Gr. Mayapple root . . . •87 25-665 410-64 Leptandra . 1:94 57-23 915-68 Hydrastis . ■84 24-78 396-48 Hamamelis leaves . . 1-24 36-58 585-28 Mayapple root . . . 2-11 62-245 995-92 Hydrastis . 263 77-585 1241-36 Aletris . •94 27-73 443-68 Table 3. Eight glass tubes, J inch diameter, and 10 inches long, were carefully sunk into alcohol until a little more than half filled, then the lower orifice was corked. A plug of cotton was now thrust from the top until an inch below the alcohol. Different powders were then poured into the tubes until even with the surface of the alcohol. Each powder was then covered with a plug of cotton, the tubes filled with alcohol, corked, and placed in a quiet position. In six months the liquids below and above were identical in appearance. In every case the lower liquid was first coloured. Experiments with larger amounts were much more striking. Aconite. — Yellowish stratum appears at bottom of tube in two and a half hours. Entire lower liquid yellowish in twenty hours. Upper transparent. Helonias dioica. — Lower liquid tinged in twenty hours, increasing to yellow in thirty-four days. Upper trans¬ parent. Blue Flag. — Lower liquid yellow in thirty hours, in¬ creasing to dark yellow in thirty-two days. Upper transparent. Tamarac Cones . — Lower liquid reddish in four hours, blood-red in twenty hours. Upper slightly pink in thirty days. Mayapple. — Lower liquid yellow in twenty hours. Upper slightly tinged in thirty-four days. Bloodroot. — Lower liquid tinged in four and a half hours at bottom, reddish-yellow throughout in twenty hours, increasing in colour for thirty-two days, when it is a dark yellowish-red, and upper liquid is yellowish. Black Cohosh. — Lower liquid yellowish in twenty hours. Upper transparent. Lobelia Herb. — Lower liquid contains greenish-yellow stratum at bottom in two hours ; greenish -yellow through¬ out in twenty hours. Upper liquid slightly tinged in forty hours. Lower liquid brownish-yellow in thirty- four days. Upper yellowish. September 11, 1880.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS, 213 Table 4. No. of maceration. FI. oz. of liquid ob¬ tained by each ma¬ ceration. The part of the entire ex¬ tractive matter con¬ tained in the powder, ob¬ tained by each maceration. The part of the entire ex¬ tractive matter of the powder con¬ tained in each fl. oz. of the liquid. Total fl. oz. of liquid ob¬ tained. Total part ob¬ tained of the entire extrac¬ tive matter contained in the powder. The part of the entire extrac¬ tive matter of the powder contained in each fl. oz. of the entire liquid. Decrease of extractive matter in each fl. oz. of the liquid, occa¬ sioned by the addition of the liquid ob¬ tained by the last macera¬ tion. The part of the entire extrac¬ tive matter remaining after each maceration. 1st . 3 •75 •25 3 •75 •25 •25 2nd . 4 •20 •05 7 •95 •1357 •1143 •05 3rd . 4 •04 •01 11 •99 •09 •0457 •01 4th . ‘ . . . . . 4 •008 •002 15 •998 •06653 •02347 •002 5th . 4 •0016 •0005 19 •9996 •05261 •01392 •0005 6th . 4 •00032 •00008 23 •99992 •04347 •00914 •00008 7th . 4 •00006 •00002 27 •99998 •03703 •00644 •00002 Table 5. No. of macerations. Fl. oz. of liquid ob¬ tained by each ma¬ ceration. The part of the entire extrac¬ tive matter contained in the powder obtained by each macera¬ tion. The part of the entire extrac¬ tive matter of the powder contained in each fl. oz. of the liquid. Total fl oz. of liquid ob¬ tained. Total part ob¬ tained of the entire extrac¬ tive matter contained in the powder. The part of the entire extrac¬ tive matter of the powder contained in each fl. oz. of the entire liquid. Decrease of the extractive matter, in each fl. oz. of the liquid, oc¬ casioned by the addition of the liquid obtained by the last ma¬ ceration. The part of the entire extrac¬ tive matter remaining after each maceration. 1st .... 3 •6 •2 3 •6 •2 •4 2nd . 4 •26666 *06666 •*7 • •86666 •12381 •07619 •13333 3rd ...... 4 •08889 •02222 11 •95555 •08686 •02695 •04444 4th . 4 •02963 •00741 15 •98518 •06568 •02118 •01482 : 5th . 4 •00988 •00247 19 •99506 •05237 •01331 •00494 ‘ 6th . 4 •00329 •00082 23 •99835 •04341 •00896 •00165 ' 7th . 4 •0011 •00028 27 •99945 •03702 •00639 •00055 Each experiment consisted of 24 troy ounces of granu¬ lated sugar, packed with like pressure into cylindrical percolators. Height occupied by experiment No. 7, 5 inches. Height occupied by experiment No. 6, 1 inch. Menstruum, diluted alcohol. Rapidity of percolation uniform with both experiments, both being conducted simultaneously. Table 6. Percolate. Grains of sugar ob¬ tained from 1 c.c. of percolate. Grains of sugar con¬ tained in each perco¬ late of 8 fl. oz. 1st . . . 8*87 2093-32 2nd . . . . I 8*74 2062-64 3rd . . . 8*67 204612 4th . . . 5-99 1413-64 5th . . . 3-58 844-88 6th . . . •04 9-44 Table 7. Percolate. Grains of sugar ob¬ tained from 1 c.c. of percolate. Grains of sugar con¬ tained in each perco¬ late of 8 fl. oz. | 1st .... 5-38 1269-68 2nd .... 4-48 1077-28 3rd .... 3-31 781-16 4th .... 2-46 580-56 5th ... . 1-93 455-48 6th ... . 1-73 403-56 Each experiment consisted of 16 troy ounces of pow¬ dered (dusted) Leptandra Virgimca, moistened with alcohol, and packed in different sized cylindrical per¬ colators with like pressure, the percolation being after¬ ward conducted with the same menstruum. Height of powder experiment No. 8 was 5£ inches. Height of powder experiment No. 9 was 1£ inch. The percolations were conducted simultaneously. Percolates were passed as nearly as possible with uniform rapidity, and every precaution was taken to secure identical conditions of both. Table 8. Percolates. Grains of dry ex¬ tractive matter ob¬ tained from 1 c.c. of percolate. Grains of dry ex¬ tractive matter con¬ tained in each per¬ colate of 2 fl. ozs. 1st . 3-92 231-28 2nd . 3-20 198-80 3rd . 2-37 139-83 4th . 1-80 106-20 5th . 1-29 7611 6th . •93 44-87 7th . •63 37-17 8th . •40 23-60 9th . . . , . •34 20-06 10th . •25 14-75 Uth . •25 14-75 12th . •23 13-57 214 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [September li, 1880 Table 9. Percolates. Grains of dry ex¬ tractive matter ob¬ tained from 1 c.c. of percolate. Grains of dry ex¬ tractive matter con - tained in each per¬ colate of 2 fl. ozs. ; 1st . 2-18 128-62 2nd . 2-04 120-36 3rd . 1-76 103-84 4th . 1-49 87-91 5th . 1-20 70-80 6th . •98 57-82 7th . •94 55-46 8th . •72 42-48 9th . •61 35-99 10th . •40 23-60 Uth . ^•47 27-73 12th . •43 25-37 Each experiment consisted of 8 troy ounces of AJstonia constricta in fine (dusted) powder, moistened with alcohol, and packed in different sized cylindrical percolators with like pressure, the percolation being afterward conducted with alcohol. Height of powder of experiment No. 10 was 5 inches. Height of powder of experiment No. 11 was 1£ inch. The experiments were conducted simul¬ taneously. Percolates were passed with uniform rapidity as nearly as possible. Table 10. Percolates. Grains of dry ex¬ tractive matter ob¬ tained from 1 c.c. of percolate. Grains of dry ex¬ tractive mattercon - tained in each per¬ colate of 2 fl. ozs. 1st • 1-76 103 84 2nd • •93 54-87 3rd • •49 28-91 4th • •24 14-16 5th • •22 12-98 6 th • •14 8-26 7th • •16 9-44 8th • •13 7-67 9th • •16 9-44 10th • •12 7-08 11th • •13 7-67 12th • •12 7-08 13th • •10 5-90 14th • •10 5-90 15th • •07 4-13 16 th • Tl 6-49 Table 11. Percolates. Grains of dry ex¬ tractive matter ob¬ tained from 1 c.c. of percolate. Grains of dry ex¬ tractive matter con¬ tained in each per¬ colate of 2 fl. ozs. 1st • •73 43-07 2nd • •68 40-12 3rd • •47 27-73 4th • •36 21-24 5th • •28 16-52 6th • *24 1416 7th • •17 10-03 8th • •15 8-85 9th • •16 9-44 10th • •17 10-03 11th • •13 7-67 12 th • •14 8-26 Table 11 — continued. Percolates. Grains of dry ex¬ tractive matter ob¬ tained from 1 c.c. of percolate. Grains of dry ex¬ tractive natter con¬ tained in each per¬ colate of 2 fl. ozs. 13 th . •12 7-08 14th . •09 5-31 15 th . •11 6-49 16th . •11 6-49 Each experiment consisted of 16 troy ounces of chloride of sodium, in coarse powder, packed with like pressure, in different sized cylindrical percolators. No. 12 occupied three and a half inches in height. No. 13 occupied seven- eighths of an inch in height. Water was the menstruum. The percolates were reserved in fractions of 8 fluid ounces. The experiments were conducted simultaneously, and every precaution taken to secure uniformity, but the per¬ colates were permitted to pass naturally and freely. Table 12. Percolates. Grains of salt ob¬ tained from 1 c.c. of percolate. Grains of salt con¬ tained in each per¬ colate of 8 fl. ozs. 1st . 4-89 1154-04 2nd . 4-91 • 1158-76 3rd . 4-97 1172-92 4th . 4-43 1045-48 5th . 3-05 719-80 Table 13. Percolates. Grains of salt ob¬ tained from 1 c.c. of percolate. Grains of salt con¬ tained in each per¬ colate of 8 fl. ozs. 1st . 4-89 1154-04 2nd . 4-90 1156-40 3rd ..... 4-91 1158-76 4th . 4-00 944-00 5th . 2 76 651-36 f Table 14. 8 troy ounces of coarse-ground ergot. Height of powder, 4£ inches. Menstruum: alcohol, 1 ; water, 3. 1 c.c. contains dry extractive matter. Total percolate contains dry extractive matter. 1st percolate, 1 fl. oz. . . 4-76 140-42 2nd „ „ „ 3-59 105-905 3rd ., ,, ,, . . 2-91 85-845 4th „ „ „ 2-26 66-67 5th ,, ,, >j • 1-76 51-92 6th ,, ,, „ . . 1-47 43-365 Table 15. 16 troy ounces of coarse-ground ergot. Height of powder If inches. Menstruum : alcohol, 1 ; water, 4. 1 c.c. contains dry extractive matter. Total percolate^ contains dry extractive matter. 1st percolate, 1 fl. oz. . . 2-85 84-075 2nd „ „ „ 2-76 81-42 3rd ,, » tt • • 2-66 77-97 4th ,, ,, ;, . . 2-64 77-88 5th ,, ,, • « 2-59 76-405 6th ,, » » • 1-58 46-61 September 11, 1880.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 215 nwmtftml Journal. - + - SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1880. Communications for the Editorial department of this Journal, hooks for review, etc., should he addressed to the Editor, 17, Bloomsbury Square. Instructions from Members and Associates respecting the transmission of the Journal should he sent to Mr. Elias Bremridge, Secretary, 17, Bloomsbury Square, W.C. Advertisements, and payments for Copies of the Journal, Messrs. Churchill, New Burlington Street, London , W. Envelopes indorsed “ Pharm. JournP THE FUTURE OF THE DRUG TRADE. Much of tlie correspondence that reaches us in reference to the present condition and future pro¬ spects of the drug trade furnishes evidence of the precarious and unsatisfactory state of affairs that prevails at the present time, and various as are the suggestions offered with the object of effecting some improvement, we cannot say that any one has yet come under our notice which can be trusted to as promising immediate relief from the evils which chemists and druggists have to contend with. In fact the very diversity of opinion on this subject is in itself a reason by no means inconsiderable for apprehending that the prospect of amelioration is somewhat remote. As regards the competition which is now brought to bear upon chemists and druggists by co-operative stores, grocers and others who have entered upon the trade in articles which were formerly sold only by chemists and druggists, it must be acknowledged that this is, on the whole, perhaps the most serious disadvantage to which they are exposed. In so many instances the trade in patent medicines and other kinds of proprietary articles constitutes so large a part of the business of a chemist and druggist, that when he is called upon to face competition in this trade upon terms that are inconsistent with the nature of his business the prospect presented to him is necessarily most discouraging. Whatever alter¬ native he adopts there is but little reason for ■expecting a satisfactory result. That he can con¬ sistently, with due regard to his obligations and responsibility to the public, and with proper con¬ sideration for the legitimate dignity of his calling, carry on business upon the principle of small profits and quick returns is, in our opinion, utterly im¬ possible. Whether or not the consumption of quack medicines can be promoted by selling them on this principle is, for our present purpose, not a question worth considering, inasmuch as that is ■outside the scope of legitimate pharmaceutical busi¬ ness, in the conduct of which it would be unreason¬ able to suppose increased consumption of medicine would be a result of the reduction of its cost, as might be the case with any ordinary commodity of daily use. The grocer who sells patent medicines very nearly at cost price does not trust to this trade for his living : it is only an accessory that can be carried on without involving much, if any, addition to his general expenses, and if it only gives him an infinitesimal profit in return for such slight trouble as it entails, he at least secures by it the advantage of attracting custom for his other goods, which is of much more importance to him. This is the true explanation of the fact that some proprietary articles are sold retail by grocers and at the stores at prices even below the advertised wholesale prices. In one instance that lately came under our notice, such an article in great demand was being sold retail at five shillings, although the wholesale dealer’s price for it was six shillings. We are therefore thoroughly in accord with those of our correspondents who deprecate a reduction of prices so as to compete with the stores. Among others, Mr. Chapman put this view very sensibly in the Journal of the 21st ult. No doubt the recent decision in favour of co-operative trading has in¬ clined some chemists and druggists to make greater efforts to compete by reducing their prices. We quite agree with Mr. Chapman in thinking this to be inadvisable for, of course, a half measure would have no effect in bringing trade to the chemist and druggist, people would still go to the cheaper market, and a reduction of prices to the level of the stores or the pushing grocer could only give the chemist and druggist trade without its corresponding advantage. Mr. Chapman illustrates the impracticability of competition by various examples, the force of which will be apparent to every one who has to do with trade in the articles mentioned. But what is the natural result to be foreseen from adopting the alternative course, recommended by Mr. Chapman, of refusing to compete with the low priced sellers? Naturally the loss of the trade in the articles referred to, and that undoubtedly means ruin for many of those engaged in the drug trade as it is now generally carried on. This is the rut into which the wheel of the chemist and druggist’s waggon has sunk and stuck fast. But while de¬ ploring his condition, we confess we cannot sympa¬ thize with the cry that he addresses to the Council of the Pharmaceutical Society to obtain for him protection in the sale of patent medicines and pro¬ prietary articles. We doubt whether protective measures, even if there were any chance of their being obtainable, would do much good, and we would rather advise recourse to the old medical principle of endeavouring to remove the cause of the disastrous influences which now press so hardly upon chemists and druggists as to imperil, in many cases, their very existence. With such an object, let us consider what are the circumstances that have brought about the present state of affairs. In the first place it must be remem¬ bered that while the business of the chemist and druggist has developed into a distinct form, it has 216 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [September li, i860. never yet been possible to secure such a thorough transfer of dispensing from the hands of medical men to chemists and druggists as would admit of their business being generally kept within its legiti¬ mate bounds. The necessity of the chemist and druggist as a means of conveniently supplying the wants of the public has operated largely as an in¬ ducement to enter upon his business ' while, at the same time, the idea of its being less laborious, more profitable and generally of a higher character than other kinds of retail trade has probably had a strong influence in the same direction. Chemists and druggists having thus become too numerous in proportion to the demands upon them for carrying out strictly pharmaceutical business have gradually taken up other branches of trade. In this way there was added on to the business of pharmacy properly so called a kind of spurious business that might have been carried on by a grocer’s boy as well as by the most accomplished pharmacist, and as the worst feature of this course chemists and druggists have been the chief agents in the introduction of patent medicines, etc., to the public notice. But now that the profitable result of this trade is being torn from them by the competition of stores and grocery shops there seems to be strong reason for seeking protection to their interests by a closer adherence to legitimate pharmaceutical business and by a jealous determination to limit, in the most rigorous manner, the admission to the right of carry¬ ing on that kind of business, which differs so entirely from all other branches of trade as to demand in the public interest proof of competent skill and ex¬ perience on the part of those allowed to carry it on. It is by such protection alone that we have any hope to see the true interests of pharmacy conserved in this country and it is only by such means that we think it possible to attain the result pointed to by Lord Justice Bramwell when he observed that the days of protection being past the only interests worth consideration were those which could protect themselves. If on this higher platform chemists and druggists resolve to abandon the idea of underselling as a policy at once short-sighted, erroneous and derogatory, and to adhere to a more dignified and consistent course of securing business in virtue of their superior qualification and by the exercise of attention, civility, neatness and dispatch, while maintaining from their customers a just apprecia¬ tion of their technical knowledge and responsibility, more may, we believe, be done for the drug trade than can be expected by making demands upon Parliament for legislation inconsistent with all the tendencies of the age. Of course we do not overlook the fact that the adoption of such a course involves great difficulties, and many great hardships, but when it is con¬ sidered what mischief has been brought about by reliance upon the patent medicine trade as a main feature of the chemists and druggists’ business, and how thoroughly it has been the means of upsetting the efforts of local associations to ensure harmony and mutual co-operation for the advancement of pharmacy ; when it is remembered that so much of the present distress is due to the cultivation of this spurious trade, we think that many will deem it wiser even to risk the loss of this trade than reduce themselves to the level upon which it must obviously be carried on for the most part in future. PROPOSED ADULTERATION BILL FOR THE UNITED STATES. Her Majesty’s Secretary of Legation at Washing¬ ton, U.S., reports that considerable attention is being just now paid to the subject of adulteration, and that an attempt is being made to secure the passage of a Bill by Congress to ‘‘regulate commerce between “ the States and to protect the citizens of each State “ against the frauds and abuses of an untrammelled “interchange of manufactures and commodities.” From some of the reports that have been drawn up, it would appear that if wooden nutmegs are played out the genus is still fairly represented across the Atlantic. One report states that six packages of coffee berries, purchased in Baltimore, being tested by simply washing them to remove the dressing, lost weight respectively 68, 64, 63, 58, 19 and 8 per cent. The washings being evaporated gave residues containing in each case chromate of lead, phosphate of lime (from bone black) and sulphate of barium. In another report inferior molasses is said to be mixed gallon for gallon with the liquid glucose now used largely for flavouring syrups, whilst glucose in the solid form is in its turn freely mixed with low class sugars to lighten their colour. The draft Bill put forward to remedy the evil appears to be a very crude production, and in providing sweeping penal¬ ties upon undefined adulteration promises a crop of troubles similar to those borne by early legislation on this subject in our own country. UTILIZATION OF WASTE. A notable instance of the utilization of waste is to> be found in the smelting works of the Greek Laurium Company at Ergasteria, where the material operated upon for several years past has been the slag (sconce) of the ancient lead mines of Laurium. This slag, however, is now nearly exhausted, and the company is now operating chiefly upon the ekbolades or rejected materials of the ancient mines. These still exist in enormous quantities and although the yield of lead from them is considerably smaller, twenty tons daily instead of thirty, the yield of silver is larger. It is computed that the materials rejected by the old miners contain in their natural state 5 to 6 per cent, of lead and 1250 grams of silver per ton, whilst the slag yielded only about 700 grams of silver to each ton of lead produced. Upwards of three thousand hands are employed in this utilization of the waste of former generations, and amongst the staff are to be found a medical man and a pharmacist. September 11, 1880.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 217 rombings of Stimtiftt Sotitfbs. BRITISH PHARMACEUTICAL CONFERENCE. (Continued from page 186.) The reading of papers was then proceeded with. The first paper read was a — Report on the Aconite Alkaloids. BY C. R. ALDER WRIGHT, D.SC. (LOND.), Lecturer on Chemistry, in St. Mary's Hospital Medical School, AND E. H. RENNIE, M.A. (SYDNEY), D.SC. (LOND.), Demonstrator of Chemistry, in St. Mary's Hospital Medical School. The alkaloids contained in 300 lbs. of fresh aconite herb (A. Napellus), grown at Foxton, in Cambridgeshire, were isolated by the methods described in last year’s report, viz., crushing, maceration in alcohol, expression of extract, evaporation to a smaller bulk, and treatment of the liquid (weighing about 59 lbs.) with soda, and repeatedly shaking with ether. A quantity of alkaloidal matter was thus readily dissolved out, a small portion remaining permanently dissolved in the alkaline fluid, in a form difficultly soluble in ether ; the alkaloidal matter thus retained yielded nothing crystalline on precipitation with mercuro-iodide of potassium, and treatment with sulphuretted hydrogen, and appeared to be all but destitute of the characteristic physiological action of aconite, producing little or no tingling of the lips, when applied thereto ; it greatly resembled the corresponding substance similarly obtained from the extracts derived from the various kinds of aconite roots examined in previous reports, consisting of a mixture of amorphous bases of lower molecular weight than aconitine, some of which differ therefrom markedly in being readily soluble in caustic and carbonated alkalies, and in being only imperfectly removed from such solutions by ether. The alkaloidal substances dissolved out by the ether treatment, being mixed with a large quantity of greenish soft resin, were separated therefrom by agitation with tartaric acid solution and separation of the tartrate solution thus formed ; on treating this with sodium carbonate and ether, about 15 grams of alkaloids were finally obtained by the spontaneous evaporation of the ethereal solution. No artifice employed was successful in making this product either crystallize or yield crys¬ tallized salts of any kind; it appeared, however, to contain a notable amount of aconitine, producing an energetic action on the lips when cautiously applied thereto, though it was by no means so powerfully active as pure aconitine. On combustion it yielded the following numbers indicating, as did also its physical properties, that it was substantially the same mixture of alkaloids as that occurring in A. Napellus roots, only differing therefrom in containing a smaller percentage of aconitine, the quantity of uncrys- tallizable bases being relatively much larger.* (1). ‘2845 gram of substance dried at 110° gave *6735 C02 and '217 H20. '459 gram of substance burnt with soda lime gave •01222 N. A portion of the substance was dissolved in dilute hydrochloric acid, and the. solution precipitated by slow addition to a dilute solution of sodium carbonate ; the flakes thrown down after collection and washing, gave these numbers : — * It would seem to be highly probable that the presence in excess of non-crystalline bases, preventing crystallization of what aconitine is present, is the main cause of the difficulty which we understand is sometimes experienced in isolating the crystallizable alkaloid from A. Napellus roots in the process of manufacture on the large scale. (2). *290 gram gave '694 C02 and T95 H20. '387 gram gave •00993 N. (l) (2) Carbon . . . . . . 64'56 65'26 Hydrogen . . . . . 8'47 7*47 Nitrogen . . . . . 2'66 2'57 The sodium carbonate solution contained about a gram of a soft alkaloid readily soluble in alkalies and for the most part soluble in water, and but sparingly soluble in ether, doubtless therefore consisting largely of aconine, either produced by the saponification of aconitine during the process of working out the bases present in the herb, or else originally present therein. The above numbers and general results are practically identical with those obtained from the mixture of aconitine and uncrystallizable alkaloids accumulating in the mother liquors from which the aconitine from A. Napellus root (described in report 1877, p. 461), had sepa¬ rated by crystallization, two samples of them giving the following numbers. Carbon . 65'80 65'46 Hydrogen . 7*7 8 7‘58 Nitrogen . 2'7l 3'05 Benzoic acid formed by saponification .... 14'4 14'1 On boiling up the mixture of alkaloids (1) above, benzoic acid was formed to a somewhat greater extent than with these two samples; 2 ’227 grams gave of purified acid, by titration '3904 grams, by direct weighing (including a minute amount of resinous matter), *397 gram. By titration 17'5. By weighing 17'8 The benzoic acid produced melted at 120° ; it gave no trace of coloration with ferric chloride after fusion with caustic potash at 250°, acidulation, and treatment with ether; whence evidently no veratric (dimethylproto- catechuic) acid was present, and therefore no pseud- aconitine was contained in the herb employed. Hence it results that the quantity of active alkaloid contained in the aconite herb is probably somewhat less than that contained in the roots, reckoned on the dry substance ;ffor a quantity of roots was found (Report 187 6, p. 539), to contain about '07 per cent of total bases, of which aconitine constituted so large a proportion that about two-fifths of the total alkaloid was obtained as pure crystallized aconitine. Admitting the 300 lbs. (or about 135 kilos) of fresh herb to represent one-fifth of that amount of substance in the same state of dryness as the roots (an estimate probably in excess of the truth), the total yield of alkaloids readily soluble in ether being about 15 grams, this would represent about '05 per cent, of total alkaloids contained in the dry herb; the per¬ centage of aconitine in this amount of total alkaloids being much less than that in the root alkaloids, so that the relatively large amount of non-crystalline bases wholly prevented crystallization. It can, however, hardly be concluded from these two cases that it is a general rule that aconite roots are richer in crystallizable aconitine than the dry herb ; for we are informed by Mr. John Williams that it has sometimes happened in his factory that no crystallizable aconitine at all but only non-crystalline bases could be isolated from batches of roots worked up on the manufacturing scale in precisely the same way as other batches which readily yielded crystals ; whence it would seem that the roots occasionally are either poorer in aconitine or richer in non- crystalline bases than those described in the Report for 1876; and it is therefore much to be desired that further experiments should be made as to the quantity of crystallized aconitine that can practically be isolated on the manufacturing scale from roots of various ages and grown in different soils and climates, etc. Such experiments as these, like the analogous questions as to what precise method of manipulating and what menstrua will best suffice on the large scale to separate aconitine economically from the non- crystalline alkaloids accom- 218 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. September n, isso. panying it, cannot readily be carried out by the scientific chemist working in his laboratory on a comparatively small scale ; but they are indispensable in order to put the economical production of crystallized aconitine on a sound commercial footing. At the present moment the pharmaceutical aspect of the production of aconitine is as follows. Prior to the last eight or ten years the term “aconitine,” was applied to an amorphous alkaloidal substance extracted by pro¬ cesses investigated by Yon Planta, Geiger and Hesse, and other chemists from A. Napelius, and probably mixtures of that and other species. During the last decade the experiments of T. B. Groves and Duquesnel, together with those carried out by the aid of the Phar¬ maceutical Conference grants by Alder Wright and colla- borateurs, and described in the series of reports of which this is the concluding one, have demonstrated that the active alkaloid of A. Napelius (to which for some years the name “aconitine” has been restricted) is a definite crystallizable substance occurring naturally intermixed with larger or smaller quantities of amorphous bases of much less highly active characters, and is readily split up by various chemical reagents into benzoic acid and a base (aconine), comparatively speaking inert: the want of uniformity in physiological action of the product obtained by processes such as those employed by the older chemists being due partly to the presence of variable quantities of the natural amorphous alkaloids co-existing with aconi¬ tine, and partly to the decomposition of a large portion of the aconitine originally present by the action of the particular chemicals and mode of treatment employed during the extraction operations. Further, the relation¬ ships of this aconitine to other analogous aconite alkaloids derived from other species ( e . g. pseudaconitine from A. ferox), and to organic bodies generally have been attentively studied. As a consequence of these experiments, a demand for pure crystallized aconitine has sprung up, more especially in America, the object being to replace the amorphous unreliable preparations generally met with in the market by the pure uniform alkaloid ; but at the present moment this demand is to a great extent unsatisfied because, whilst the supply of A. Napelius of American growth is too limited to enable American drug manufacturers to prepare the pure alkaloid themselves, its manufacture in Europe has not yet been carried out to any considerable extent ; from whence it results that whilst the Committee of the American Pharmaceutical Association on the Revision of the U. S. Pharmacopoeia is desirous that the forthcoming new edition of that Pharmacopoeia should exclude the amorphous preparations and should define aconitine solely as the crystallized uniform body C33H43N012, described in detail in former Reports to the Pharmaceutical Conference,* yet it appears at present somewhat doubtful whether it will be practicable for this desire to be carried out, simply because this pure article is not to be found in the market, at any rate to an extent at all comparable with the demand for it. Professor Attfield said the Conference should not lose sight of the question raised by Dr. Wright as to the influence of age, climate and soil on the quantities of active matter present in the aconite; nor of the other question raised as to the best mode of commercially manufacturing the alkaloid. It might be a question * For an epitome of the characters (physical and chemical) of aconitine and other allied aconite alkaloids, vide The Pharmaceutical Journal, July 3, 1880, and following numbers, in which some points connected with the practical economical side of the question are discussed, the origin of these communications being an application to the subscriber by Dr. Charles Rice, Chairman of the Revision Committee of the U. S. Pharmacopoeia, for a precis of the characters of aconitine and other information concerning it for the guidance of the Committee. — C. R. Alder Wright. whether the latter matter should be left now to com¬ mercial enterprise or whether the Conference should do. any more in that direction. Experiments respecting the influence of soil and climate on plants required a great deal of time and a great deal of money ; but as had been, already intimated the Conference had money to spend on these very matters, and it seemed a pity that this question should be finally disposed of in this concluding report by Dr. Wright. At any rate, he hoped the matter would not be altogether lost sight of. Mr. Schacht said he should like to lay stress on one observation made by Dr. Wright, viz., that the crys¬ tallizable principle in these solutions was rendered more difficult of crystallization by the presence of uncrys- tallizable matter. It occurred to him that that was somewhat opposed to one’s usual experience in such mixtures, and he ventured to ask if it was one which other scientific chemists would be prepared to endorse. Dr. Wright was so shrewd and able a man that one would like to receive everything he suggested, even a scientific guess, with great respect, but it seemed a little outside his own experience at any rate. Mr. Umney, though he had had no experience in this particular alkaloid, had found in the quinine manufacture, when the mother liquor contained a large quantity of crystallizable alkaloid, it was most difficult to crystallize it when the amorphous alkaloid was also present. He had no doubt there was the same difficulty in crys¬ tallizing sugar when there was a large quantity of treacle present. At any rate he could speak positively as to the cinchona alkaloid. Mr. Gerrard said he could corroborate Mr. Umney’s statement with regard to another alkaloid, pilocarpine, and also eserine. He had found great difficulty in crys¬ tallizing the eserine salts he had prepared in the presence of some amorphous or syrupy bodies. There seemed some amorphous bodies present generally in some plants,, which when evaporated to a certain extent greatly re¬ tarded crystallization. Mr. Reynolds said there was another view of the case and that was the possibility of a still more serious- condition of things, the conversion of the crystallizable alkaloid into an uncrystallizable product. He thought this might be possible under some circumstances which had not been sufficiently studied. Mr. Schacht said that was just the point he was urging the solution of. Professor Attfield said the uncrystallizable matters, so called by Dr. Wright, were simply those which he had not yet succeeded in crystallizing. It might be, when better methods of separation were devised, much of this matter would turn out to be crystalline, and, being separated, not prevent, to the same extent as at present, the crystallization of the true aconitine. If it were necessary to give any further answer to the question raised by Mr. Schacht he might say that for several years he had a great deal of experience in the crystallization of matter from fluids obtained from herbs, and his almost constant experience was that syrupy fluids of that kind did yield crystals very easily, and which looked very beautiful, but they always turned out to be sulphate of lime ; whereas the alkaloid and organic matter which he was in search of were considerably retarded in crystallization by the presence of uncrystallizable matter. Mr. Reynolds remarked that old pupils of Dr. Pereira would no doubt remember one of his stock stories, that when Dr. Thomson’s collection of alkaloids was examined the crystals unfortunately turned out to consist largely of sulphate of lime. Mr. Greenish had observed that in a large number of roots of aconite a change had occurred which was probably due to the conversion of starch into a gummy body. This applied more to the A. ferox, which came from India, than to the A. Napelius, grown in Germany ; he had found it occur in the latter, and it sometimes, made the whole root so hard that in making sections it September 11, i860.] THE PHAEMACEUTICAL JOUENAL AND TEANS ACTIONS. 219 actually turned the edge of the knife. Whatever this hard substance was he could only recognize it as some gummy body; it might interfere very much with the crystallization of the alkaloid. The President said a vote of thanks was due to Dr. Wright for his very able paper. The next paper read was entitled — Notes on the Essential Oil op Buchu Leaves. BY PROFESSOR FLUCKIGER. If thin layers of buchu oil are exposed to spontaneous evaporation, a crystallized substance makes its appear¬ ance. On submitting 35 kilograms of round buchu leaves to ^distillation ( Barosma betulina), I obtained 180 grams of 'essential oil, i.e., a little more than \ per cent. From this the crystals can be extracted by means of caustic lye. The oil repeatedly shaken with an equal volume of soda lye, 1*14 sp. gr., forms a yellowish turbid mixture soon separating into two clear layers (A) and (B). The heavier (A) then displays a bright red colour ; it should be washed several times with ether, in order to remove that portion of the oil which is simply dissolved in, not combined with the alkaline liquid. One volume of the washed portion (A) is then diluted with 4 volumes of alcohol sp. gr. 0*83 and neutralized with an acid, either sulphuric, acetic or carbonic, when an oily layer separates. In a couple of hours or sooner it concretes, and affords a crystallized mass of what we may call diosphenol, with allusion to Diosma, the original Linnean name bestowed on the buchu plants. The upper lighter layer (B), on being extracted repeatedly with warm water, further affords a small amount of diosphenol. The crude oil, as obtained from Barosma betulina , yielded nearly of its weight of the phenol. A mixture of one volume of alcohol 0*83 sp. gr., and five volumes of ether is a good solvent for recrystallizing the diosphenol ; by gently warming the crude crystals with three times their weight of the mixture, they dissolve, and on cooling afford pure crystals. The results of two elementary analyses of them were as follows : — I. 0*2236 gram of diosphenol gave C02: 0*5752 gram = 0*1569 C and OH2: 0-1910 gram = 0*0212 H. II. 0-2236 gram of diosphenol gave C02 : 0’5758 gram = 0*1570 C and OH2 : 01946 gram = 0*02i6 H. From these figures, the formula C14H2203 may be calculated, viz. : — Found. I. II. 14 C 168 70*58 70*17 per cent. 70*21 percent. 22 H 22 9*24 9*48 „ 9*69 „ 3 0 48 20*18 - - 238 100*00 Diosphenol usually forms acicular crystals ; by slow crystallization somewhat larger, well defined crystals were obtained, which were crystallographically examined in Professor Gfroth’s laboratory by Dr. A. Cathrein. They will be fully described in Professor G-roth’s Zeitschrift fur Krystallographie ; in the meantime I am indebted to Dr. Cathrein for summarizing his observations as follows : Diosphenol belongs to the monosymmetrical ( monoclinic ) system. Eatio of axes : — a : b : c.= 1*3017 : 1 : 1*5435 ,3 = 81° r Colourless prisms, elongated parallel to the axis b, generally tabulated parallel to c (see fig.). Faces observed : c = (001), d = (101), a— (100), o=. (121), m= (110), s= (121). a : c = (100) (001) 81° T c : d = (001) (101) 55° 7 m : a=(110) (100) 52° 8' m : c = (110) (001) 84° 33£' o : c=(121) (001) 70° 6' s : c = (121) (001) 75° 58' Cleavage distinct, parallel to a (100). The optical axes for red light in the plane of symmetry, for yellow the substance is uniaxe, for green the plane of the axes is normal to the plane of symmetry. Double refraction negative. The crystals of diosphenol melt at 83° (181*4° F.) and boil at 233° (451*4° F.) ; I have, however, not been able to distil it in the usual way without a partial decomposition. By subliming diosphenol in the temperature of a steam - bath, thin prisms 2 inches long are easily to be obtained. It is readily soluble in alcohol 0*83 sp. gr., less so in ether, but very sparingly in water. The aqueous solution in boiling water on cooling affords small acicular crystals. The solutions are perfectly neutral, and on addition of an alcoholic solution of ferric chloride assume a dark colora¬ tion of dingy green. The crude oil as well as the water distilled from buchu leaves exhibit the same behaviour. Diosphenol has a slightly aromatic odour and taste, “ sui generis,” by no means reminding of buchu leaves. It is soluble in concentrated sulphuric acid, but without forming a crystallizable compound; on saturating the brown solu¬ tion thus obtained with carbonate of baryum and duly concentrating the filtrate, I obtained only a small quan¬ tity of an uncrystallizable baryum salt. By caustic lye, diosphenol is also readily dissolved, but it is not able to decompose the carbonates ; by carbonic acid on the other hand, it is precipitated from its solution in potash, soda or hydroxide of baryum. In 50 parts of the latter (Ba(OH)2 + 80H2 in 20 parts of water) diosphe¬ nol dissolves very slowly. By allowing such a solution to evaporate slowly over lumps of potash, no well-defined baryum compound of diosphenol could be obtained, crys¬ tals of the pure phenol even gradually making their appearance on the sides of the beaker. Nor have I succeeded in preparing a solid potassium or sodium com¬ pound. These few experiments show that the substance under notice belongs to the class of phenols, although its action on sulphuric acid and the hydroxides of potassium, sodium and baryum, is less manifest than with many other sub¬ stances of the phenol class. As to the other constituents of buchu oil, the portion which had been exhausted with caustic lye was again shaken with the same, when it was entirely dissolved, but immediately separated on addition of much water. This oil, washed with water and dehydrated with powdered chloride of calcium, was distilled. Very little passed until 205° C. (401° F.) was reached. The main portion came over between 205° and 210° C., a small amount only was collected above the latter boiling point. All the various fractions of the oil assumed likewise a green coloration when mixed with aqueous or alcoholic perchloride of iron. The oil boiling between 205° and 210° C. is remarkable on account of its odour, which agrees very nearly with that of peppermint ; I know in fact of no other essential oil possessed of this aroma except peppermint. The oil under examination is devoid of rotatory power ; submitted to elementary analysis, 0*1942 gram of it gave C02 : 0*5528 gram = 0*1508 6. and OH2 : 0*2064 gram=0*0229 H, that is to say C : 77*65 per cent., and H : 11*79 per cent. The formula C10H18O requires 77*92 C. and 11*69 220 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [September li, i860. per cent. H. The main portion of the buchu oil, after the extraction of the phenol, is thus shown to consist of one of the numerous modifications of the molecule C10H18O, the presence of which is the more and more frequently ascertained among the constituents, both solid and liquid, of essential oils. From some experiments with the crude oil of buchu, instituted by Dr. Power, it would appear the compound C10H18O is contained in the oil in the form of a compound ether. In concluding, I may say, that I have not found in the buchu oil salicylic acid, which has been announced by Wayne ( American Journal of Pharmacy, 1876, 19); also ‘Year-Book of Pharmacy,’ 1876, 229), to be yielded by the oil. It remains, however, to be examined, whether this holds good for other varieties of buchu leaves than that examined by myself. The President said the thanks of the Conference were due to Professor Fiiickiger for his able paper on a rather abstruse subject. Professor Attfield said the interest of this subject lay in the fact that this substance was very much like car¬ bolic acid ; though the author did not seem to have suc¬ ceeded in uniting it with alkalies. But he noticed that Professor Fiiickiger had used solutions in alkalies, and it was not very easy to get perfectly definite compounds which would stand evaporation by putting carbolic acid into alkaline solutions ; but if carbolic acid were mixed with the solid alkali fusion was effected and it was quite possible that if this phenol were mixed with its equivalent proportion of solid alkali a compound must be produced. Perhaps Dr. Powder could say whether the compound which yielded the colour was a solid body. Dr. Power said the colour depended entirely on the phenol. It did not give the colouring action with chloride of lime. There would be a little of the crystalline prin¬ ciple in the oil. The next paper read was entitled — ■ Notes on the Constituents of Peppermint Oil. BY PROFESSOR FLUCKIGER AND DR. F. B. POWER. The oil of peppermint is one of the few essential oils which are produced on a very large scale. According to the statistics contained in ‘ Pharmacographia,’ oil of turpentine, oil of lemon and of bergamot, grass oil, and oil of caraway, would appear to be the only ones which are sent to the market in much more considerable quan¬ tities than peppermint oil. Oil of cassia in this respect approaches apparently more nearly to the last named. Peppermint oil owes its value to the solid compound termed menthol, C10Hj9OH. This substance, the al¬ coholic nature of which was first demonstrated by Oppenheim* by the formation of several compound ethers, has been shown by Beckett and Alder Wright + to be connected both with the paraffin series and the benzene series, inasmuch as by the action of dehydrating agents it is easily converted into menthene, C10H18, which, by the action of bromine, combines to form te- trabromdecane, and the latter compound, by heating, being readily split into hydrobromic acid and cymene, or, as expressed by the equation— C10H18Br4 = 4HBr + C10H14. The hydrocarbon menthene therefore occupies an inter¬ mediate position between the decane of the paraffin series, C10HW, and the cymene of the “ aromatic ” series, o10h14. With the exception of menthol, no other constituent of peppermint oil has as yet been duly isolated ; it seemed to us therefore of considerable interest to determine the chemical nature of the liquid constituents of the oil. In the beginning we had the intention to submit the * Oomptes Rendus, liii., 329; Jaliresberichtder Chemie, 1861, p. 683. f ‘Year-Book of Pharmacy,’ 1875, p. 605. Japanese oil to examination, having, been obligingly supplied with the fresh herb, as imported into London, by Mr. Thomas Christy, F.L.S., and on the other hand with peppermint oil, imported by Mr. Chantre, F.L.S., of London. The herb, upon being submitted to dis¬ tillation, yielded immediately an abundance of menthol, accompanied by a small amount of liquid compounds. The oil, presented to us by Mr. Chantre, on the contrary, refused to crystallize, even when exposed for a month to a temperature of from about 15Q C. — ( + 5°F.)to — • 20° C. ( — 4° F.) Upon submitting the oil to distillation, we found it to be largely adulterated with alcohol, after the removal of which the residual oil afforded a good yield of menthol. This unsatisfactory result prompted us to work on the Mitcham oil. The oil employed for analysis was obtained from Messrs. Schimmel and Co., of Leipsic, and consisted of Mitcham oil, which they had deprived by repeated recti¬ fication as completely as possible of menthol. According to information furnished us by Dr. Bertram, the superintending chemist of Schimmel’s laboratory, the crude Mitcham oil yields 80 — 85 per cent, of a liquid product, sold by the firm as “extra strong oil,” and con¬ sisting principally of menthol, together with about 10 per cent, of an oil which has remained as yet uninvestigated; the loss of 5 — 10 per cent, resulting from the separation of the constituents consisting of soft resinous matters. The oil from which the menthol had been separated was submitted by us to fractional distillation. The largest portion was found to distil at 165— 175° C., a smaller fraction of somewhat viscid character being collected at 250 — 275° C. The first fraction, or that collected at 165 — 175° C.,was then submitted to elementary analysis with the following result : — 0T690 gram of substance gave 0"5348 gr. C02 = 01458 C., and 01868 gr. H20 = 0-0207 H." Calculated. _ Found. y Ci0Hi6. CioH18. Cio 120 88-23 C 87-00 C 86-27 h16 16 11-77 H 13-00 H 12-25 136 100-00 100-00 98-52 This result wotdd serve to prove that the body con¬ sisted essentially of a hydrocarbon, contaminated with a small amount of oxygenated substances. It was then purified by repeated distillation over metallic sodium, and was so divided into two fractions, boiling respectively at 165 — 170° C., and 173— 176° C. ; at the same time the peppermint odour of the original liquid having dis¬ appeared, and given place to that of freshly distilled oil of turpentine. The two fractions were then separately submitted to analysis with the following result : I. Fraction 165 — 170° C. 9"2428 gram of substance gave 0"7844 gr. C0o = 0-2139 O., and 0’2624 gr. H20 = 0*0291 H. “ Calculated for Ci0H16. Found. Cio 120 88-23 C 88-09 h16 16 11-77 H 11-98 136 100-00 100-07 The specific gravity of the liquid is 0’859 at 20° C. Its rotation in sodium light in a tube of 100 mm. at 25° C., is 13° to the left. II. Fraction 173 — 176° C. 0-1874 gram of substance gave 0-6032 gr. CO^r= 0-1645 C., and 0-2004 gr. H20 = 0-0223 H. Calculated for C10H16. Found. C10 120 88-23 C 87-87 H16. 16 11-77 H 12-08 136 100-00 99-95 The specific gravity of the liquid is 0*856 at 20° C. ; September li, 1880.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 221 its rotation, in sodium light, in a tube of 100 mm. at 25° C., is 24° 4' to the left. The two fractions, when treated with the nitric acid mixture, afforded after standing for some time no crystals of terpine, and upon saturation with dry hydrochloric acid gas, only liquid hydrochloric compounds were formed. III. The small fraction collected at 250 — 275° C., afforded after repeated rectification over metallic sodium a colourless, limpid liquid, boiling at 255 — 260° C. It was analysed with the following results : — 0*1962 gram of substance gave 0*6312 gr. C0o = 0*1721 C., and 0*2132 gr. H20 = 0 0237 H. Calculated for Ci0H16. Found. Cjo 120 88*23 C 87*87 Hie 16 11*77 H 12*08 136 100*00 99*95 The molecular formula of this fraction in view of its high boiling point is undoubtedly a multiple of the simple formula C10H16, and would be more correctly expressed by the formula C15H24, in accordance with the molecular formula of those terpenes having similar boiling points. Its specific gravity is 0*912 at 21° C. ; its rotation in sodium light, in a tube of 100 mm., at 25° C., is 9° 2' to the right. The liquid portion of Mitcham peppermint oil is thus seen to consist simply of isomeric and polymeric terpenes, containing no menthene, as might be supposed from the dehydration of the menthol, and the absence of compound ethers in the oil is also herewith established. According to Beckett and Wright,* the liquid portion of Japanese peppermint oil contains a small amount of a substance isomeric with borneol, an inference drawn from analytical numbers obtained from a fraction boiling at 210 — 215°, and which by treatment with zinc chloride yielded principally menthene. That no body of the formula C10H18O is present in the liquid portion of Mitcham peppermint oil is conclusively established by the analysis of the oil itself, previously freed as completely as possible from menthol, and before treatment with metallic sodium. As has been pointed out in ‘ Pharmacographia,’ some specimens of peppermint oil are capable of yielding a small amount of a crystalline compound with alkaline bisulphites. This observation we have now confirmed with the crude Mitcham oil ; the body in question appearing, however, to be prin¬ cipally contained in the so-called “ extra strong oil,” and has, therefore, probably a boiling point approximating closely to that of menthol. It is furthermore contained in the oil in such exceedingly small amounts that its isolation for the present must remain uneffected. It would also seem possible that to this body the remarkable colour reaction and fluorescence is due, which is displayed by fresh peppermint oil, when allowed to remain a short time in contact with a few drops of nitric acid, sp. gr. 1*20, as the reaction is not displayed by the terpenes, nor by the menthol.f Peppermint oil by age gradually loses the faculty of assuming this coloration with nitric acid, which would also point to a substance easily undergoing chemical change. We have had as yet no opportunity of submitting the terpenes of peppermint oil to oxidation, which should form a sub¬ ject for a special study, although it is probable that the lower boiling fractions would furnish the same products as turpentine oil, and terpenes having similar boiling points, viz. : acetic, terebinic, terpenylic and terephthalic acids, while menthol, according to the observations of Oppenheim,i is converted by oxydizing agents chiefly into what he calls “ resinous bodies.” * Journ. of the Cliem. Soc., 1876, p. 3. + See ‘ Pharmacographia.’ X Compt. Rend., lvii., p. 360. The President said the Conference was much indebted to Dr. Power 1 for this paper, which had a considerable bearing on the question of the adulteration of these oils. Dr. Power regretted that he was not able to present specimens of these products. It was a remarkable fact that the liquid portion of peppermint oil when entirely free from menthol had an odour entirely distinct from peppermint, but somewhat reminding one of lemon oil, though corresponding more nearly to that of freshly dis¬ tilled turpentine oil. Professor Attfield remarked that one paragraph in the paper illustrated very well the risks run by experimenters who depended on the commercial articles. The presence of the alcohol in one of the samples examined showed that when essential oils were to be examined, as matter of original research, they should be either carefully isolated by the experimenter himself or else obtained from a manufacturer who would guarantee their purity. Mr. Mason said he believed the specimen referred to was manufactured on the continent. It was quite unusual for oil of peppermint to be adulterated with alcohol in this country. Mr. Greenish thought the results showed that adultera¬ tion varied over a large number of specimens, and it was difficult to determine what could be relied upon unless the experimenter were present, and saw the oil made, or made it himself. It seemed as difficult to obtain pure peppermint oil as genuine port wine, which, it was said, could only be secured by going to Portugal and buying a cask, and sitting on it all the way home. In many of these experiments the results could not be relied upon, simply because the article was not genuine. Dr. Symes thought some of the results obtained would be due to the presence of a resinous matter, and this would vary with the age of the oil. Probably some of the resinous matter would be produced in the distillation, and there would be some oxidation which would also vary in different samples. He should like to know if the experiments had been conducted with oil of a known age or with specimens of different ages, and whether the amount of resin was found to be constant in different samples. Mr. Umney said the Mitcham oil of peppermint would always contain a large amount of this resinous principle, and its presence was owing to the crude way in which the essential oil was manufactured. If anyone visited the fields at Mitcham, Carshalton, or the neighbourhood, he would see the herb cut with a sickle and thrown bodily into a still, not heated by steam but by direct fire, and very often some portions got actually charred ; thus the empyreumatic matter was driven over, and a large quantity of resinous matter would be present in the oil. He considered that no specimen of English manufacture could be considered pure unless it had been rectified the second time with water, and then a very small quantity of the resinous principle would be present. Mr. Reynolds said it was quite necessary to go beyond the mere fact that an article was called “ best,” because unless there was something added to the superlative, the mere market name carried no guarantee of purity. He had just lit upon a quotation from Southey, in which he said that there was an ingenious tradesman who sold gloves, and whose worst gloves were distinctly known as “best.” He had, however, four other kinds, which he called “better than best,” “better than better than best,” “ best of all,” and “the real best.” Dr. Power, in reply to Dr. Symes, said the oil used in these analyses was quite fresh, and had been redistilled by Messrs. Schimmel and Co. ; there was very little resinous matter contained in the oil as sent for analysis, though according to the report of their own chemist it usually showed from 5 to 10 per cent, of resinous matter on rectification. (To be continued.) 222 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [September 11, isso. BRITISH ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCE MENT OF SCIENCE. Section A, Mathematical and Physical Science, met on Thursday, in the Argyle School, under the Presidency of Professor W. Grylls Adams, M.A., F.R.S., etc., who proceeded to deliver the following Address : — On the Constitution of Bodies. It has been said by a former President of this Section of the British Association that the President of a section ought to occupy your time, not by speaking of himself or his own feelings, but by a review “ more or less extensive of those branches of science which form the proper business of his Section.” He may give a rapid sketch of the pro¬ gress of mathematical science during the year, or he may select some one special subject, or he may take a middle course, neither so extensive as the first nor so limited as the second. There are many branches of science which have always been regarded as properly belonging to our Section, and the range is already wide ; but it is becoming more and more true every day that the sciences which are dealt with in other sections of the Association are becoming branches of physics, i.e., are yielding results of vast importance when the methods and established principles of physics are applied to them. It is not long since the theory of exchanges became thoroughly recognized in the domain of radiant heat, and yet it is already recognized and accepted in the theory of chemical combination. Just as the molecules of a body which remains at a constant temperature are continuously giving up their heat motion to surrounding molecules, and getting back from them as much motion of the same kind in return, so in a chemical compound which does not appear to be undergoing change, the combining molecules are continuously giving up their chemical or combining motions to surrounding molecules, and receiving again from them as much combining motion in return. We may say that each molecule is, as far as we can see, constantly dancing in perfect time with a partner, and yet is continuously changing partners. When such an idea of chemical motion is accepted, we can the more easily understand that chemical combination means the alteration of chemical motion which arises from the introduction of anew element into the space already occupied, and the consequent change in the motion of the new compound as revealed to us in the spectroscope. We can also the more readily understand that in changing from the old to the new form or rate of motion, there may be a development of energy in the shape of heat motion which may escape or become dissipated wherever a means of escape presents itself. We know from the experiments of M. Favre that as much heat is absorbed during the decomposition of an electrolyte as is given out again by the combination of the substances composing it. We are making rapid strides towards the exact deter¬ mination of those relations between the various modes of motion or forms of energy which were so ably shadowed forth, and their existence established long ago, by Sir William Grove in his Correlation of the Physical Forces, where, in stating the conclusion of his comparison of the mutual interchange of physical forces, he distinctly lays down the principles of energy in this statement. “Each force is definitely and equivalently convertible into any other ; and where experiment does not give the full equivalent, it is because the initial force has been dissi¬ pated, not lost, by conversion into other unrecognized forces. The equivalent is the limit never practically reached.” The laws of Faraday, that (1) when a compound is electrolysed, the mass of the substance decomposed is proportional to the quantity of electricity which has pro¬ duced the change, and that (2) the same current decom¬ poses equivalent quantities of different substances, i.e. quantities of their elements in the ratio of their combining numbers, have given rise to several determinations of the relation between chemical affinity and electromotive force. In a paper lately communicated to the Physical Society, Dr. Wright has discussed these several determinations, and has given an account of a new determination by himself. The results obtained are compared with the heat given out by the combustion of hydrogen and oxygen, and the value of the mechanical equivalent of heat is deduced from these determinations. The value obtained by Dr. Wright, which depends on the value of Clark’s standard cell, agrees fairly we 1 with Joule’s determination from the heat produced by an electric current in a wire, but is greater than Joule’s value as obtained from his water-friction experi¬ ments. This may be accounted for by supposing an error in the value of the ohm or B.A. unit, making it too large by 1*5 or 2 per cent. Kohlrausch has also made comparisons of copies of the B.A. unit with standard coils, and comes to the conclusion that the B.A. unit is 1’96 per cent, too large. On the other hand, Professor Rowland, in America, has made a new determination, and finds that according to his calculations the B.A. unit is nearly 1 per cent, too small. These differences in the values obtained by different methods clearly point to the necessity for one or more new determinations of the unit, and I would venture to suggest that a discrimination should be made under the authority of this Association, by a committee appointed to carry out the work. And it is not sufficient that this determination should be made once for all, for there is reason to think that the resistance of standard coils alters with time, even when the material has been carefully selected. It has been found that coils of platinum silver which were correct copies of the standard ohm have become so altered, and have their temperature coefficients so changed, that there are doubts as to the consistency of the standards themselves. Pieces of platinum-silver alloy cut from the same rod have been found to have different temperature coefficients. The value *031 for 1° C. is given by Matthiessen for this alloy, yet two pieces of wire drawn from the same rod have given, one '021 per cent, and the other *04 per cent, for 1° C. Possibly this irregularity in the platinum-silver alloys may be due to something analogous to the segregation which Mr. Roberts has found to take place in copper-silver alloys in their molten state, and which Matthiessen in 1860 regarded as mechanical mixtures of allotropic modifi¬ cations of the alloy. A recommendation has been made that apparatus for determining the ohm should be set up in London, and that periodically determinations be made to test the electrical constancy of the metals and alloys used in making coils. A committee should be authorized to test coils and issue certificates of their accuracy, just as is done by the Kew Committee with regard to meteoro¬ logical instruments. The direct relation between heat and chemical work has been established, and the principles of conservation of energy been shown to be true in chemistry by the experiments and deductions of Berthelot and of Thom¬ sen, so that we may say that when a system of bodies passes through any succession of chemical changes, the heat evolved or absorbed when no external mechanical effect is produced depends solely upon the initial and final states of the system of bodies, whatever be the nature or the order of the transformations. The extension of this prin¬ ciple to the interaction of the molecules and atoms of bodies on one another is of vast importance in relation to our knowledge of the constitution of matter, for it enables us to state that each chemical compound has a distinct level or potential which may be called its own, and that when a compound gives up one of its elements to another body, the heat evolved in the reaction is the difference between the heat of formation of the first compound, and that of the resulting product. It has been well said by a former President of this Section that quality and quan¬ tity are the primary features to be observed in scientific inquiry, and the domain of quantity has everywhere en¬ croached on that of quality. Lest that should be the case in my address, I wish to direct your attention to September 11, 18S0.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 223 investigations of another kind which are being made in that fertile region for discovery, the “border land” between chemistry and physics, where we have to deal with the constitution of bodies, and where we are tempted to speculate on the existence of matter and on the nature of the forces by which the different parts of it are bound together, or become so transformed that all resemblance to their former state is lost. We have become accustomed to regard matter as made up of molecules, and those molecules to be made up of atoms separated from one another by distances which are great in comparison with the size of the atom, which we may regard as the smallest piece of matter that we can have any conception of. Each atom is surrounded by an envelope of ether which accompanies it in all its movements. The density of the ether increases rapidly as an atom is approached, and it would seem that there must be some force of attraction between the atom and its ether envelope. All the atoms have motions of translations in all possible directions, and according to the theories of Maxwell and Boltymann, and the experiments of Kundt, War¬ burg, and others on the specfic heat of vapours, in one- atom molecules in the gaseous state there is no motion of rotation. According to the theory of Pictet, the liquid state being the first condensation from the gaseous state must consist of at least two gaseous atoms combined. These two atoms are bound to one another through their ether envelopes. Then the solid state results from the condensation of a liquid, and so a. solid molecule must consist of at least two liquid molecules, i.e. at least four gaseous molecules, each surrounded by an atmosphere of ether. M. Pictet imagines these atoms to be centres of attraction ; hence in the solid with four such centres the least displacement brings into action couples tending to prevent the molecule from bursting as soon as external forces act upon it. All the molecules constituting a solid will be rigidly set with regard to one another, for the least displacement sets in action a couple or an opposing force in the molecules on one another. Let us now follow the sketch which M. Pictet has given of changes which we may consider it to undergo when we expend energy upon it. Suppose a solid body is at absolute zero of temperature, which may be regarded as the state in which the molecules of a body are in stable equilibrium and at rest, the application of heat gives a vibratory motion to the molecules of the solid, which in¬ creases with the temperature, the mean amplitude of vibration being a measure of the temperature. We may re¬ gard the sum of all the molecular forces as the specific heat of the body, and the product of the sum of all the molecular forces by the mean amplitude of the oscilla¬ tions ; i.e. the product of the specific heat and the tem¬ perature will be the quantity of heat or the energy of motion of the body. As more and more heat is applied, the amplitude of vibration of the molecules increases until it is too great for the molecular forces, or forces of cohesion, and the melting point of the solid is reached. Besides their vibratory motion, the molecules are now capable of motions of translation from place to place among one another. To reduce the solid to the liquid state, i.e. to make the amplitude of vibration of the mole¬ cules sufficient to prevent them from coming within the sphere of the forces of cohesion, requires a quantity of heat which does not appear as temperature or molecular motion, and hence it is termed the latent heat of fusion. The tem¬ perature remains constant until the melting is complete, the heat being spent in bursting the bonds of the solid. Then a further application of heat increases the ampli¬ tude of vibration, or raises the temperature of the liquid at a rate depending on its specific heat until the succession of blows of the molecules overcomes the external pressure and the boiling point is reached. An additional quantity of heat is applied which is spent in changing the body to a gas, i.e. to a state of higher potential, in which the motion of translation of the molecules is enormously increased. When this state is attained, the temperature of the gas again begins to increase, as heat is applied, until we arrive at a certain point, when dissociation begins, and the molecules of the separate substances of which the body is composed have so large an amplitude of vibration that the bond which unites them can no longer bring them again into their former positions. The poten¬ tial of the substances is again raised by a quantity which is proportional to its chemical affinity. Again, we may increase the amplitude of vibration, i.e. the temperature of the molecules, and get higher and higher degrees of dissociation. If temperature means the amplitude of vibration of the molecules, then only those bodies which have their temperatures increased by the same amount when equal amounts of heat are applied to them can pos¬ sibly combine with one another ; and so the fact that the increase of temperature bears a fixed ratio to the increase of heat may be the cause in virtue of which bodies can combine with one another. Were other bodies to begin to combine together at any definite temperature, they would immediately be torn to pieces again when the temperature is even slightly raised, because the ampli¬ tudes of vibration of their molecules no longer remain the same. This idea of temperature is supported by the fact that a combining molecule of each substance requires the same amount of heat to raise its temperature by the same number of degrees, the atomic weights being proportional to the masses of the combining molecules. The cele¬ brated discovery of Faraday, that in a voltameter the work done by an electric current always decomposes equivalent quantities of different substances, com¬ bined with the fact that in the whole range of the physical forces work done is equivalent to the application heat, is quite in accordance with tbe view that no molecule can combine with another which has not its amplitude of vibration altered by the same amount when equal quantities of heat are applied to both. As soon as we get any divergence from this state of equal motions for equal increments of heat, then we should expect that a further dissociation of molecules would take place, and that only those which are capable of moving together can remain still associated. Just as in the change of state of a body from the solid to the liquid, or from the liquid to the gas, a great amount of heat is spent in increasing the motion of translation of the molecules without altering the temperature, so a great amount of heat is spent in producing dissociation without increasing the temperature of the dissociated substances, since the principle of conservation of energy has been shown by M. Berthelot to hold for the dissocia¬ tion of bodies. We may conveniently make use of the term latent heat of dissociation for the heat required to dissociate a unit of mass of a substance. We may thus sum up the laws of physical and chemical changes : — 1. All the physical phenomena of change of state con¬ sist in the subdivision of the body into molecules or particles identical with one another. 2. The reconstitution of a body into a liquid or a solid being independent of the relative position of the mole¬ cules, only depends on the pressure and temperature. 3. Dissociation separates bodies into their elements, which are of different kinds, and the temperature re¬ mains constant during dissociation. 4. The reunion of dissociated bodies depends on the relative position of the elements, and so depends on the grouping of the molecules. The atomic weight being the mass of a molecule as compared with hydrogen, the specific volume, i.e. the atomic weight divided by the density, is the volume or mean free path of a molecule. Building up his theory of heat on these principles, M. Pictet arrives at a definite relation between the atomic weight of a body, its density, its melting point, and its coefficient of expansion, which may be stated thus — The volume of a solid body will be increased as the 224 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [September 11, i8so. temperature rises by an amount which is proportional to the number of molecules in it, and inversely as its specific heat. At a certain temperature peculiar to each body, the amplitude of the heat oscillation is sufficient to melt the solid, and we are led to admit that for all bodies the intermolecular distance corresponding to fusion ought to be the same. The higher the point of fusion of a body, the shorter, on this theory, must be its heat vibrations. The product of the length of swing (the heat oscillations) by the temperature of fusion ought to be a constant number for all solid bodies. A comparison of the values of the various quantities involved in these statements shows a very satisfactory agreement between theory and experiment, from which it appears that for twenty-three different substances the product of the length of swing by the temperature of fusion lies between 2 ‘3 and 3 ‘7 for most substances. We know very little about the latent heat of dissociation. In order to determine it, say, for the separation of oxygen and hydrogen, we should have to determine the amount of work required to produce a spark in a mixture of oxygen and hydrogen, and to measure the exact amount of water or vapour of water combined by the spark as well as the range of temperature through which it had passed after its formation. Our usual mode of producing heat is by the combination of the molecules of different substances, and we are limited in the production of high temperatures, and in the quantity of available heat necessary to dissociate any considerable quantity of matter. If we heat vapours or gases, we may raise their temperatures up to a point cor¬ responding to the dissociation of their molecules, and we are limited in our chemical actions to the temperatures which can be obtained by combining together the most refractory substances, as we are dependent on this com¬ bination for our supply of heat. The combination of carbon and hydrogen with oxygen will give us high temperatures, so that by the oxy hydrogen blow-pipe most of the salts and oxides are dissociated. The metalloids bromine, iodine, sulphur, potassium, etc., are the results of the combination of two or more bodies bound together by internal forces much stronger than the affinity of hydrogen or carbon for oxygen, for approxi¬ mately they obey the law of Dulong and Petit. Eor higher temperatures, in order to dissociate the most refractory substances, we require the electric current, either a continuous, current, as in the electric arc from a battery, or, more intense still, the electrical discharges from an electrical machine or from an induction coil. This electric current may be regarded as the most intense furnace for dissociating large quantities of the most refractory substances, and the electric spark may be regarded as something very much hotter than the oxyhy- drogen blow-pipe, and therefore of service in reducing very small quantities of substances which will yield to no other treatment. The temperature of the electric arc is limited, and cannot reach above the temperature of dissociation of the conductor, and in the case of the constant current, which will not leap across the smallest space of air unless the carbons have first been brought in contact, the current very soon ceases when the point of fusion has been reached. Yet in the centre of the arc we have the gases of those substances which form the conductor ; and, as Professor Dewar has shown, we have the formation of acetyline and cyanogen and other com¬ pounds, and therefore must have attained the tempe¬ rature necessary for their formation, i.e. the temperature of their dissociation. The temperature of the induction spark, or, at least, its dissociating power, is higher than that of the arc. We know that the spark will pass across a space of air or a gaseous conductor, and we are limited by the dissociation of the gaseous conductor, and get only very small quantities of the dissociated sub¬ stances, which immediately recombine, unless they are separated. If the gases formed are of different densities they will diffuse at different rates through a porous diaphragm, and so may be obtained separated from one another. As the molecules of bodies vibrate they pro¬ duce vibrations of the ether particles, the period of the oscillations depends on the molecules of the body, and these periodic vibrations are taken up by their ether envelopes and by the luminiferous ether, anJ their wave-length determined by means of the spectroscope. The bright line spectrum may be regarded as arising from the vibratory motions of the atoms. As the tem¬ perature is increased, the amplitudes of oscillation of the molecules and of the ether increase, and from the calcu¬ lations of Lecoq de Boisbaudran, Stoney, Soret, and others, it would appear that many of the lines in the spectra of bodies may be regarded as harmonies of a fun¬ damental vibration. Thus Lecoq de Boisbaudran finds that in the nitrogen spectrum the blue lines seen at a high temperature correspond to the double octave of certain vibrations, and that, at a lower temperature, red and yellow lines are seen which correspond to a fifth of the same fundamental vibrations. The bright line spectrum may be regarded as arising from the vibratory motions of the atoms. A widening of the lines may be produced at a higher temperature by the backward and forward motions of the molecules in the direction of the observer. A widening of the lines may also be produced by increase of pressure, because it diminishes the free path of the molecules, and the dis¬ turbances of the ether arising from collisions become more important than vibrations arising from the regular vibrations of the atoms. Band spectra, or channelled space spectra, more readily occur in the case of bodies which are not very readily subject to chemical actions, or, according to Professors Liveing and Dewar, in the case of cooler vapours near the point of liquefaction. The effects of change of temperature on the character of spectra is very well illustrated by an experiment of M. Wiedmann with mixtures of mercury with hydrogen or nitrogen in a Geissler’s tube. At the ordinary tempera¬ ture of the air the spectrum of hydrogen or nitrogen was obtained alone ; but on heating the tube in an air-bath the lines of mercury appeared and became brighter as the temperature rose, and at the same time the hydrogen lines disappeared in the wider portion of the tube and at the electrodes. The hydrogen or nitrogen lines disappeared first from the positive electrode and in the luminous tuft, and as the temperature rose disappeared altogether. With nitrogen in a particular experiment, up to 100° C., the nitrogen lines were seen throughout the tube, but from 100° to 230° the nitrogen lines appear towards the negative pole, and the mercury lines are less bright at the negative than at the positive pole, while about 230 Q C. no nitrogen lines appear. The experiments of Roscoe and Schuster, of Lockyer and other observers, with potassium, sodium, and other metal¬ loids in vacuum tubes, from which hydrogen is pumped by a Sprengel pump, also show great changes in the molecular condition of the mixture contained in the tubes when they are heated to different temperatures. The changes of colour in the tube are accompanied by changes in the spectrum. Thus, when potassium is placed in the bottom of the tube, and the spark passes in the upper part of it, as the exhaustion proceeds and the tube is slightly heated, the hydrogen lines disappear, and the red potassium line makes its appearance ; then as the temperature is increased, the red line disappears, and three lines in the yellowish-green make their appear¬ ance, accompanied by a change in the colour of the tube, and at a higher temperature, and with a Leyden jar joined to a secondary circuit of the induction coil, the gas in the tube becomes of a dull red colour, and with this change a strong line comes out in the spec¬ trum, more refrangible than the usual red potassium line. In this case, on varying the conditions, we get a variation in the character of the spectrum, and the colours and spectra are different in different parts of September 11, 1880.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 225 the tube. In Lockyer’s experiments, at the temperature of the arc obtained from a Siemens dynamor machine, great differences appear in different parts of the arc : for instance, with carbon poles in the presence of cal¬ cium, the band spectrum of carbon, or the carbon flutings and the lines of calcium, some of them reversed, are seen separated in the same way as mercury and hydrogen, the carbon spectrum appearing near one pole and the calcium near the other, the lines which are strongest near that pole being reversed or absorbed by the quantity of calcium vapour surrounding it. On intro¬ ducing a metal into the arc, lines appear which are of different intensities at different distances from the poles, others are strong at one pole and entirely absent at or near the other, while some lines appear as broad as half-spindles in the middle of the arc, but are not present near the poles. Thus, the blue line of calcium is visible alone at one pole, the H and K lines without the blue line at the other. We may probably regard these effects as the result, not of temperature alone, but must take into account that we have powerful electric currents which will act unequally on the molecules of different* bodies according as they are more or less electro-positive. It would seem that we have here something analogous to the segregation which is ob¬ served in the melting of certain alloys to which I have already referred in my address. The abundance of material in some parts of the arc surrounding the central portion of it gives rise to reversal of the principal lines in varying thicknesses over the arc and poles, so that bright lines appear without reversal in some regions, and reversals or absorption lines without bright lines in others. The introduction of a substance into the aic gives rise to a flame of great complexity with regard to colour and concentric envelopes, and the spectra of these flames differ in different parts of the arc. Thus, in a photograph of the flame given by maganese, the line at wave-length 4234*5 occurs without the triplet near 4030, while in another the triplet is present without the line 4234*5. The lines which are reversed most readily in the arc are generally those the absorption of which is most developed in the flame ; thus the manganese triplet in the violet is reversed in the flame, and the blue calcium line is often seen widened when the H and K lines of calcium are not seen at all. In consequence of the numerous changes in spectra at different temperatures, Mr. Lockyer has advanced the idea that the molecules of elementary matter are continually being more and more broken up as their temperature is increased, and has put forward the hypothesis that the chemical elements with which we are acquainted are not simple bodies, but are themselves compounds of some other more simple substances. This theory is founded on Mr. Lockyer’s comparisons of spectra and the maps of Augstrom, Thalen, and others, in v hich there are coincidences of many of the short lines of the spectra of different substances. These short lines are termed basic lines, since they appear to be common to two or more substances. They appear at the highest temperatures when the longest lines of those substances and those which are considered the test of their presence are entirely absent. Mr. Lockyer draws a distinction between weak lines, which are basic, i.e. which would permanently exist at a higher temperature in a more elementary stage, and other weak or short lines which would be more strongly present at a lower temperature, in a more complex stage of the molecules. Thus, in lithium, the red line is a low tem¬ perature line, and the yellow is feeble ; at a higher tem¬ perature, the red line is weak, the yellow comes out more strongly, and the blue line appears ; at a higher tempera¬ ture still, the red line disappears, and the yellow dies away; whilst at the temperature of the sun the violet lithium line is the only one which comes out strongly. These effects are studied by first producing the spectrum •of the substance in the Bunsen flames, and observing the changes which are produced on passing a spark through the flame ; thus, in magnesium a wide triplet or set of three lines (5209 '8, b1 and b2) is changed with a narrow triplet (b1, b2, and b4) of the same character. We have here what some observers regard as a recurrence of the same harmonic relation of the vibrations of the same body at a higher temperature. If the so-called elements are compounds, they must have been formed at a very high temperature, and as higher and higher temperatures are reached the dissocia¬ tion of these compound bodies will be effected, and the new line spectra, the real basic lines of those substances which show coincidences, will make their appearance as short lines in the spectra. In accordance with this view, Mr. Lockyer holds that the different layers of the solar atmosphere may be regarded as a series of furnaces, on the hottest of which, A, we have the most elementary forms of matter capable of existing only in its uncom¬ bined state ; at a higher and cooler level, B, this form of matter may form a compound body, and may no longer exist in a free state at the lower temperature ; as the cooler and cooler levels, C, D, and E, are reached, the substances become more and more complex, and form different combinations, and their spectra become altered at every stage. Since the successive layers are not at rest, but in a state of disturbance, we may get them somewhat mixed, and the lines at the cooler levels D and E may be associated with the lines of the hotter levels ; these would be basic or coincident lines in the spectra of two different compounds which exist at the cooler levels D and E. We might even get lines which are not present in the hottest furnace A coming into existence as the lines of compounds inB or 0, and then extending among the lines belonging to more complex compounds which can only exist at a lower temperature, when they might be present as coincident weak lines in the spectia of several com¬ pound bodies. Thus Mr. Lockyer regards the calcium lines H and K of the solar spectrum as evidence of different molecular groupings of more elementary bodies. In the electric arc with a weak current the single line 4226 of calcium, which is easily reversed, is much thicker than the two lines H and K ; but the three lines are equally thick with a stronger current, and are all reversed. With a spark from a large coil and using a condenser the line 4226 disappears, and H and K are strong lines. In the sun, the absorption bands II and K are very broad, but the band 4226 is weak. Prof. Young, in his observa¬ tion of the lines of the chromosphere, finds that H and K are strongly reversed in every important spot and in solar storms ; but the line 4226, so prominent in the arc, was only observed three times in the chromosphere. One of the most interesting features among the most recent researches in Spectrum Analysis is the existence of rhythm in the spectra of bodies, as has been shown by M. Mascart, Cornu, and others, such as the occurrence and repetition of sets of lines, doublets, and triplets in the spectra of different substances and in different parts of the spectrum of the same body. Professors Liveing and Dewar, using the reversed lines in some cases for the more accurate determination of wave-lengths, have traced out the rhythmical character in the spectra of sodium, potassium, and lithium. They show that the lines of sodium and potassium form groups of four lines each, which recur in a regular sequence, while lithium gives single lines, which, including the green line, which they show really to belong to lithium, though it was ascribed to caesium by Thalbn, also recur in a similar way. In these three metals the law of recurrence seems to be the same, but the wave-lengths show that the whole series are not simple harmonies of one funda¬ mental, although between some of the terms very simple harmonic relations can be found. Between the lines G and H are two triplets of iron lines, which, according to Mr. Lockyer, do not belong to the same molecular grouping as most of the other lines. In many photo¬ graphs of the iron spectrum these triplets have appeared 226 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [September 11, isso.. almost alone. Also the two triplets are not always in the same relation as to brightness, the more refrangible being barely visible with the spark. Combining this with Young’s observations, in which some short weak lines near G appear in the chromosphere thirty times, while one of the lines of the less refrangible triplet only appears once, and with the fact that in the solar spectrum the more refrangible triplet is much the more prominent of the two, Mr. Lockyer is led to the conclusion that these two triplets are again due to two distinct molecular groupings. There is one difficulty which must be taken account of in connection with Mr. Lockyer’s theory with regard to the production of successive stages of dissocia¬ tion by means at our command: (1) by combustion of different substances ; (2) by an electric arc, which will probably give slightly different temperatures according as it is produced by different dynamo -electric machines ; (3) by the induction spark without ; and (4) with a con¬ denser. At each stage of the process there must be a consider¬ able absorption of heat to produce the change of state, and our supply of heat is limited in the electric arc because of the dissociation of the conductors, and more limited still in quantity in the electric spark or in the discharge through a vacuum tube ; also we should expect a recombination of the dissociated substances immediately after they have been first dissociated. Hence it seems easier to suppose that at temperatures which we can command on the earth, the dissociation of molecules by the arc or the spar is accompanied by the formation of new compounds, in the formation of which heat and light, and especially chemical vibrations, would be again given out, and would appear as new substances in the spectro¬ scope. To the lines C, F, G-, and H belonging to hydrogen, which have a certain rythmical character, Mr. Lock¬ yer adds D3 and Kirchoff’s line “1474,” regarding “ 1474” (wave-length) as belonging to the coolest or most complex form, and rising to F, which is again subdivided into C and G-, using the spark without a condenser, which again gives H with the spark and condenser, which is again split up and gives D3, a more simple line than H, in the chromosphere. Professors Liveing and Dewar, on the other hand, trace a rhythmical character or ratio between three of the brightest lines of the chromosphere, two of which are lines “1474” and “f” of Lorenzoni, similar to the character of C, F, and H of hydrogen, and also trace a similar relation between the chromospheric line D3 and “ 1474” to the ratio of the wave-lengths of F and G. They infer the probability that these four lines are due to the same at present unknown substance as had been suggested by Young with regard to two of them. The harmony of this arrangement is somewhat disturbed by the fact that D3 lies on the wrong side of “1474 ” to correspond with G of the hydrogen spectrum. If we inquire what our sun and the stars have to say to these changes of spectra of the same substance at different temperatures, Dr. Huggins gives us the answer. In the stars which give a very white light, such as Sirius or a Lyrae, we have the lines G and H of hydrogen and also H ; but the K line of calcium is weak in a Lyrae, and does not appear in Sirius. In passing from the white or hottest stars to the yellow stars like our sun, the typical lines diminish in breadth and are better defined, and K becomes stronger relatively to H, and other lines appear. In Arcturus we have a star which is probably cooler than our sun, and in it the line K is stronger in relation to H than it is in the solar spectrum, both being very strong compared with their state in the solar spectrum. Professors Liveing and Dewar find that K is more easily reversed than H in the electric arc, which agrees with the idea that this line is produced at a lower tem¬ perature than H, and Dr. Yogel has pointed out a co¬ incidence of a line of hydrogen with H. Besides the absence or weakness of K, the white stars have twelve strong lines winged at the edges, in which there are three of hydrogen, viz., G, h, and H, and the remaining nine form a group which are so related to one another that Dr. Huggins concludes they probably belong to one substance. Three of these lines are said by Dr. V ogel to be lines of hydrogen. Liveing and Dewar have made considerable progress in determining the conditions and the order of reversal of the spectral lines of metallic vapours. They have adopted methods which allow them to observe through greater thicknesses of vapour than previous observers have generally employed. For lower temperatures tubes of metal or other material placed ver¬ tically in a furnace were used, and the hot bottom of the tube was the source of light, the absorption being pro¬ duced by vapours of metals dropped into the hot tube and filling it to a greater or less height. By this means many of the more volatile metals, such as sodium, thallium, irridium, caesium, and rubidium, magnesium, lithium, barium, strontium, and calcium, each gave a reversal of its most characteristic line or pair of lines, i.e. the red line of lithium, the violet lines of rubidium and calcium, the blue line of strontium, the sharp green line of barium (5535), and no other lines which can certainly be ascribed to those metals in the elementary state. For higher temperatures tubes bored out in blocks of lime or of gas carbon, and heated by the electric arc, were used. By keeping up a supply of metal and in some cases assisting its volatilization by the admixture of a more volatile metal, such as magnesium, and its reduction by some easily oxidizable metal, such as aluminum, or by a current of coal gas or hydrogen, they succeeded in main¬ taining a stream of vapour through the tube so as to reverse a great many lines. In this way the greater part of the bright lines of the metals of the alkalies and alkaline earths were reversed, as well as some of the strongest lines of manganese, aluminum, zinc, cadmium, silver, copper, bismuth, and the two characteristic lines of iridium and of gallium. By passing an iron wire into the arc through a perforated carbon electrode they succeeded in ob¬ taining the reversal of many of the lines of iron. In observing bright line spectra they have found that the arc produced by a De Meriteus machine arranged for high tension gives, in an atmosphere of hydrogen, the lines C and F, although the arc of a powerful Siemens machine does not bring them out, and they have observed many metallic lines in the arc which had not been previously noticed. The temperature obtained by the De Meriteus machine is thus higher than that obtained in the Siemens machine. From observations on weighed quantities of sodium, alone as in amalgam, introduced into a hot bottle of platinum filled with nitrogen, of which the pressure was varied by an air-pump, they conclude that the width of the sodium lines depends rather on the thickness and temperature of the vapour than upon the whole quantity of sodium present. Very minute quantities diffused into the cool part of the tube give a broad diffuse absorption, while a thin layer of compressed vapour in the hot part of the tube gives only narrow absorption lines. Professors Liveing and Dewar have observed the reversal of some of the well-known bands of the oxides and chlorides of the alkaline earth metals. The lines produced by mag¬ nesium in hydrogen form a rhythmical series extending all across the well-known B group, having a close re¬ semblance in general character to the series of lines produced by an electric discharge in a vacuum tube of olefiant gas. The series appears at all temperatures except when a large condenser is employed along with the induction coil, provided hydrogen is present as well as magnesium,, while they disappear when hydrogen is excluded, and. never appear in dry nitrogen or carbonic oxide. From their experiments on carbon spectra they con¬ clude with Augstrom and Thalen that certain of the so- called “carbon bands” are due to some compound of carbon with hydrogen, probably acetylene, and that ■September ll, 1880 ] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 227 certain others are due to a compound of carbon with nitrogen, probably cyanogen. They describe some ultra-violet bands : one of them coincides with the shaded band P of the solar spectrum which accompanies the other violet bands in the flame of cyanogen as well as in the arc and spark be¬ tween carbon electrodes in the nitrogen. All the bands which they ascribe to a compound of carbon and nitrogen disappear when the discharge is fallen in a non-nitro- genous gas, and they reappear on the introduction of a minute quantity of nitrogen. They appear in the flame of hydrocyanic acid or of cyanogen, even when cooled down as much as possible, as shown by Watts, or when raised to the highest tempera¬ ture by burning the cyanogen in nitric oxide ; but no flames appear to give these bands unless the burning sub¬ stance contains nitrogen already united with carbon. As the views of Mr. Lockyer with regard to the multiple spectra of carbon have very recently appeared in the pages of Nature , I need only say that these spectra are looked upon as supporting his theory that the different flutings are truly due to carbon, and that they represent the vibrations of different molecular groupings. The matter is one of very great interest as regards the spectra of comets, for the bands ascribed to acetylene occur in the spectra of comets without the bands of nitrogen, showing that either hydrocarbons must exist ready formed in the comets, in which case the temperature need not exceed that of an ordinary flame, or else nitrogen must be absent, as the temperature which would produce acetylene from its elements would also produce cyanogen, if nitrogen were present. Quite recently, Professors Liveing and Dewar have, simultaneously with Dr. Huggins, described an ultra-violet emission spectrum of water, and have given maps of this spectrum. It is not a little remarkable that by independent methods these observers should have deduced the same numbers for the wave-lengths of the two strong lines at the most refrangible end of this spectrum. Great attention has been paid by M. Mascart and by M. Cornu to the ultra-violet end of the solar spectrum. M. Mascart was able to fix lines in the solar spectrum as far as the line R (3179), but was stopped by the faintness of the photographic impression. Professor Cornu has extended the spectrum still further to the limit (2948), beyond which no further effect is produced, owing to complete absorption by the earth’s atmosphere. A quartz-reflecting prism was used instead of a heliostat. The curvature of the quartz lens was calculated so as to give minimum aberration for a large field of view. The Iceland spar prism was very care¬ fully cut. A lens of quartz was employed to focus the sun on the slit. Having photographed as far as possible by direct solar light, Professor Cornu compared the solar spectrum directly by means of a fluorescent eye-piece with the spectrum of iron, and then obtained, by photographing, the exact positions of the iron lines which were coincident with observed lines in the solar spectrum. M. Cornu states that the dark absortion lines in the sun and the bright iron lines of the same refrangibility are of the same relative importance or intensity in their spectra, indicating the equality between the emissive and the absorbing powers of metallic vapours ; and he thinks we may get by the comparison of bright spectra with the sun some rough approximation to the quantity of metallic vapours present in the absorption layers of the sun’s atmo¬ sphere. He draws attention to the abundance of the magnetic metals — iron, nickel, and magnesium — and to the fact that these substances form the composition of most meteorites. M. Cornu has studied the extent of the ultra-violet end of the spectrum, and finds that it is more extended in winter than in summer, and that, at different eleva¬ tions, the gain in length of the spectrum for increase of elevation is very slow (only a hundred and sixth of a mm. in 868 metres), on account of atmospheric absorption, so that we cannot hope greatly to extend the spectrum by taking elevated observing stations. The limit of the solar spectrum is reached very rapidly, and the spectrum is sharply and completely cut off at about the line U (wave-length 2948). From photographs taken at Viesch, in the valley of the Rhone and at the Riffelberg, 1910 metres above it, M. Cornu finds the limits to be at wave¬ lengths 2950 and 2930 respectively. In the actual absorption of bright line spectra by the earth’s atmo¬ sphere, M. Cornu observed among others three bright lines of aluminum, which M. Soret calls 30, 31, and 32 (wave-lengths about 1988, 1930, and 1860), and he found that 32 could not be seen at the distance of 6 metres ; but on using a collimator, and reducing the distance to 1^ metres, the line 32 became visible, notwithstanding the absorption of the extra lens ; at 1 metre, line 32 was brightor than 31, and at a quarter of a metre 32 was brighter than either 30 or 31. With a tube 4 metres in length between the collimator and prism ray 32 is not seen ; but when the tube is exhausted, ray 31 gains in intensity and 32 comes into view, and gradually gets brighter than 31, whilst 30 changes very little during the exhaustion. With the same tube he found no appreciable difference between the, absorption by air very carefully dried and by moist air0 and concludes that this absorption is not due to th vapour of water, and it follows the law of pressure of the atmosphere which shows it to be due to the whole mass or thickness of the air. Also, M. Soret has shown that water acts very differently on the two ends of the spec¬ trum, distilled water being perfectly transparent for the most refrangible rays, since a column of water of 116 c.m. allowed the ray 2060 in the spectrum of zinc to pass through : on the other hand, water is so opaque to the ultra-red rays that a length of 1 c.m. of it reduces the heat spectra of metals to half their length and one quarter of their intensity. In his discussion of the mag¬ netic effects observed on the earth’s surface, General Sabine has shown the existence of diurnal variations due to the magnetic action of the sun ; also the magnetic disturbances, aurora and earth currents, which are now again beginning to be large and frequent, have been set down to disturbances in the sun. Although iron, when raised to incandescence, has its power of attracting a magnet very greatly diminished, we have no proof that it has absolutely no magnetic power left, and with a slight magnetic action the quantity of iron in the sun would be sufficient to account for the diurnal variations of the magnetic needle. During the last few weeks I have been engaged in examining the declination curves for the month of March, 1879, which have been kindly lent to the Kew Committee by the Directors of the Observatories of St. Petersburg, Vienna, Lisbon, Coimbra, and Stonyhurst. Other curves are on their way from more distant stations, but have not yet been examined. On comparing them with the Kew curves for the same period, I find the most remarkable coincidences between the curves from these widely distant stations. It was previously known that there was a similarity between disturbances at different stations, and in one or two cases a comparison between Lisbon and Kew had been made many years ago by Senor Capello and Professor Balfour Stewart, but the actual photographic magnetic records from several stations have never been previously collected, and so the opportunity for such comparisons had not arisen. Allow me in concluding my address to draw attention to a few of the more prominent features of these com¬ parisons which I have made. On placing the declination curves over one another, I find that in many cases there is absolute agreement between them, so that the rate of change of magnetic disturbances at widely distant stations like Kew, Vienna, and St. Petersburg is precisely the same : also similar disturbances take place at different 228 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [September 11, 1830. stations at the same absolute time. It may be state^ generally, for large as well as small disturbances, tha*' the east and west deflections of the declination needle take place at the same time and are of the same character at these widely distant stations. There are exceptions to this law. Some disturb¬ ances occur at one or two stations and are not perceived at another station. Many instances occur where, up to a certain point of time, the disturbances at all the stations are precisely alike, but suddenly at one or two stations the disturbance changes its character : for instance, on comparing Kew and St. Petersburg, we get perfect simi¬ larity followed by deflections of the needle, opposite ways at the same instant, and in some such cases the maxima in opposite directions are reached at the same instant, showing that the opposite deflections are produced by the same cause, and that the immediate cause or medium of disturbance in such a case is not far off ; probably it is some change of direction or intensity of the earth’s magnetism arising from solar action upon it. Generally, after an hour or two, these differences in the effects of the disturbance vanish, and the disturbances again become alike and simultaneous. In such cases of difference, if the curve tracing of the horizontal or the vertical force be examined, it is generally found that, at the very same instant of absolute time, with the begin¬ ning of these opposite movements there was an increase or a diminution in the horizontal force, and that the horizontal force continues to change as long as there is any difference in the character of the declination curves. It is clear, then, from these effects that the cause or causes of mag¬ netic disturbances are in general far distant from the earth’s surface, even when those disturbances are large ; but that not unfrequently these causes act on magnetic matter nearer to the surface of the earth, and therefore at times between two places of observation, and nearer to one than another, thus producing opposite effects on the declination needle at those places ; in such cases, the differences are probably due to changes in the earth’s magnetic force. Now, if we imagine the masses of iron, nickel, and magnesium in the sun to retain even a slight degree of magnetic power in their gaseous state —and we know from the researches of Faraday that gases on the earth are some of them magnetic — we have a sufficient cause for all our terrestrial magnetic changes, for we know that these masses of metal are ever boiling up from the lower and hotter levels of the sun’s atmosphere to the cooler upper regions, where they must again form clouds to throw out their light and heat, and to absorb the light and heat coming from the hotter lower regions ; then they become condensed and are drawn again back towards the body of the sun, so forming those remarkable dark spaces or sun spots by their downrush towards the lower levels. In these vast changes, which we know from the science of energy must be taking place, but of the vastness of ■which we can have no conception, we have abundant cause for these magnetic changes which we observe at the same instant at distant points on the surface of the earth, and the same cause acting by induction on the magnetic matter within and on the earth may well produce changes in the magnitude or in the direction of its total magnetic force, and alter the direction of its magnetic axis. These magnetic changes on the earth will influence the declina¬ tion needles at different places, and will cause them to be deflected ; the direction of the deflection must depend on the situation of the earth’s magnetic axis or the direction of its motion with regard to the stations where the observations are made. Thus both directly and indirectly we may find in the sun not only the cause of diurnal magnetic variations, but also the cause of these remark¬ able magnetic changes and disturbances over the surface of the earth. gtspenshtg |ttcmornnb:t. [443]. R Magnes. Calc . gr. xx. Tinct. Assafoet . til xx. Aquae . ad §j. Misce. On using the light magnesia and after standing a few hours, the subsidence of magnesia and assafoetida re3in developed a bright green colour. The heavy magnesia was then tried, the green colour was much longer in appearing and was not so bright. After prolonged standing in the first case the colour faded to a dull green, and in the second case the deposit assumed several colours in successive layers. To what are these changes due? J. WlLFORD. [444]. Will some reader kindly say if there are any special precautions necessary in making an emulsion of phosphorized cod liver oil? I can turn out an emul¬ sion with the plain cod liver oil, tragacanth andi glycerine being the excipients, but where phosphorus is present I fail to succeed. S. E. Clarke. [445] . R. L. G. would like to know what preparation should be dispensed when “ chloroformyl ” is prescribed. It has been ordered with sedative ingredients (Scheele’s acid, tinct. digitalis and camphor). [446] . What would be the best method of dispensing the following ? — 1 doz. suppositories, £ grain chloroform in each. Embryo. Coraspanbcna. “ Eblana.” — We do not remember a paper that answers exactly to your description, but one on “The Preparation of Syrup of Ferrous Phosphate from Metallic Ron ” will be found in vol. v. of the present series, p. 541. L. R. Oswald. — The questions will be published in the Journal for October 9, which will contain an account of the distribution of the prizes. W. Miller. — The specimen of supposed savin does not seem to have been enclosed. H. 0. I. — The following recipe for a “ crystal varnish for negatives” was given in vol. i., p. 716: — Dissolve 2% lbs. white shellac, \ lb. mastic, and £ oz. camphor in 1 gallon of hot alcohol, 64 o.p., and filter. E. W. W. — Probably a coating of nickel would best answer your purpose. See vol. ii., [3], p. 363. H. — (1) Pap aver somniferum. (2) Hippocrepis comosa. (3) Brassica campestris. (4) Stellaria media. (5) Epi~ lobium hirsutum. (6) Veronica Buxbaumii. Veronica should always be sent with the fruit well developed. W. Steivart. — (1) Ranunculus acris. (2) Potentilla reptans. (3) Circcea lutetiana. (4) Epilobium hirsutum. (5) Too fragmentary to determine. (6) Lychnis diurna. (7) Lythrum Salicaria. (8) Geum wrbanum. W. Stewart. — (1) Erythrcea Centaurium. (2) Ranun¬ culus Flammula (R. Lingua has much larger flowers). (3) Euphorbia Helioscopia. (4) Hypericum pulchrum. (5) Anagallis a/rvensis. (6) Hypericum Androscemum. E. Coleman. — (1) Probably Brassica Erucx. (2) Reseda luteola. (3) Probably Thalictrum minus. (4) Jasione montana. (5) Scabiosa succissa. (6) Scutellaria minor. Send better specimens, next time. Nos. 1 and 3 cannot be named with certainty because of being too fragmentary. “ Fraxinus.” — (1 and 2) Athyrium Filix-fcemina. (3) Blechnum Spicant. (4) A grostis vulgaris. Grasses should always have two or three stem leaves attached. H. C. H. — (1) Nepeta Glechoma. (2) Oxalis acetosella. (3) Veronica Chamcedrys. (4) Mochringia trinervis (Arenaria). (5) Stellaria Holostea. September is, i860.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 229 PREPARATION OP OPIUM FOR SMOKING. BY HUGH MCCALLUM, Pharmaceutical Chemist , Government Analyst , Hong Kong. As the policy of the opium trade from India to China is receiving considerable attention among philanthropists, etc., in England, probably the following account of the process of preparing opium for smoking purposes, as conducted by the present opium farmer in Hong Kong, may be of some interest to pharmacists. The boiling operations are carried on in a moderate sized building at Shek-tong-tsui, in the west end of the city of Victoria, where there are over eighty Chinese coolies and a few Indian watchmen em¬ ployed, all of whom live on the premises. The majority sleep in a loft immediately above the boiling rooms, the others in a room on the ground floor, which also does duty as a kitchen, mess room nnd general store, and is in open communication with the boiling rooms. The employes may therefore be said to live in an atmosphere saturated with the odour of opium, yet all seem in good health. On inquiring if many of them were habitual opium smokers,' the information received was that only one head-man smoked regularly, but that some ot the others indulged occasionally v\hen any of their friends paid them a visit. The boiling is conducted in two rooms in open connection with each other, one being set apart for the first boiling, the other for the final. The first boiling room has a row of furnaces along each side, with a few rows running transversely between them; the other has four rows, extending along the whole length of the room. The furnaces are made of a kind of fire clay and are of two sizes, the lar^e size having a diameter of about 24 inches, the small size a diameter of 18 inches, the depth of each being about 9 inches ; they are built in with brick, the fuel used is wood charcoal. The pans in which the opium is boiled are made of some kind of copper alloy, and are of two sizes so as to fit the furnaces, their shape being somewhat like a shallow evaporating dish. The opium is sent every day from the hong ( i . e., shop or firm) to the boiling house, the previous day’s boiling being then returned to the hong. The aver¬ age quantity boiled each day is from six to eight chests of Patna opium, this being the only kind used. The opium is removed from its covering of leaves, etc., moistened with a little water, and allowed to stand for about fourteen hours ; it is then divided into pans, 2J balls of opium and about 10 pints of water going to each pan ; it is now boiled and stirred occasionally, until a uniform mixture having the consistence of a thin paste is obtained. This operation takes from five to six hours. The paste is at once transferred to a larger pan and cold water added to about 3 gallons, covered and allowed to stand for from fourteen to fifteen hours. A bunch of tang Knin (lamp wick, the pith of some plant) is then inserted well into the mass, the pan slightly canted, when a rich clear brown fluid is thus drawn off and filtered through chi mui (paper made from bamboo). The residue is removed to a calico filter and thoroughly washed with boiling water, the wash water being reboiled and used time alter time. The last washing is done with pure water ; these washings are used in the next day’s boiling. The residues on the calico filters are transferred to a large one of the Third Series, No. 534. same material and well pressed ; this insoluble resi¬ due, called nai chai (opium dirt), is the perquisite of the head boiling coolie, who finds a ready market for it in Canton, where it is used for adulterating or rather in manufacturing the moist inferior kinds of prepared opium. The filtrate or opium solution is concentrated by evaporation at the boiling point, with occasional stirring, until of a proper consistence, the time required being from three to four hours ; it is then removed from the fire and stirred with great vigour till cold, the cooling being accelerated by coolies with large fans. When quite cold it is taken to the hong and kept there for some months before it is considered in prime condition for smok¬ ing. As thus prepared it has the consistence of a thin B.P. or treacly extract, and is called boiled or prepared opium. In this state it is largely exported from China to America, Australia, etc., being care¬ fully sealed up in small pots having the name of the maker ( i.e ., hong) on each. The Chinese recognize the following grades of opium : — (1) “ Raw opium as imported from India. (2) “ Prepared opium : ” opium made as above. (3) “Opium dross:” the scrapings from the opium pipe. This is reboiled and manufactured as a second class prepared opium. A Chinese doctor stated lately at a coroner’s inquest on a case of poisoning that it was more poisonous than the ordinary prepared opium. (4) “Nai chai” (opium dirt): the insoluble residue left on exhausting the raw opium thoroughly with water. What strikes one very forcibly on witnessing these operations is that the morphia value of the opium can have little to do with its smoking value, because, if so, the mode of manufacture must de¬ teriorate it considerably, owing to the long continued moist heat it undergoes ; however, there can be no doubt but the process described has after long ex¬ perience been found to yield the drug in the most approved form for smoking. This opinion naturally raises the question, which of the definite principles of opium or combinations thereof has the power when smoked, or rather burned in a pipe, the vapours being inhaled, of producing such peculiar effects ? The elucidation of this point must be of great interest both to the chemist and physiologist. HYDROBROMIC ACID.* BY EDWARD GOEBEL, PH.G. Of the various formulas recommended for the prepara¬ tion of dilute hydrobromic acid, the one probably most used by pharmacists, on account of its simpleness, is that in which solutions of potassium bromide and tartaric acid are mixed and exposed to a low temperature to separate the potassium bitartrate formed. This formula, however, yields an acid by no means as pure as desirable, as it retains a very large amount of bitartrate of potassium in solution, for although this salt is but sparingly soluble . in water, it dissolves freely in mineral acids. My attention was first drawn to this fact while preparing bromide of calcium from an acid prepared according to the above formula, by neutralizing it with calcium carbonate, when a very considerable precipitate of calcium tartrate was noticed. The acid contains about 10 per cent, of its weight of potassium bitartrate. Even by using alcohol in this formula, as has been recommended by Dr. Rice, a product is obtained which still contains considerable bitartrate. Another objection is that under certain cir¬ cumstances bromine is liberated. * From Neiv Remedies, September, 1830. 230 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. (September 18, 1880. Professor F. Schaeffer suggesting its preparation from barium bromide, some experiments were made for deter¬ mining a ready method by which this salt can be obtained. It was found that by heating together bromide of ammo¬ nium and carbonate of barium a satisfactory result is gained. The equivalents of these two salts are about the same (98), but it is best to use a slight excess of car¬ bonate of barium to insure the complete decomposition of the bromide of ammonium. The following is a good working formula : — Pure carbonate of barium . . . . 100 parts. Bromide of ammonium . 95 „ Distilled water ... a sufficient quantity. Ti iturate the salts well together with a few drops of distilled water so as to make a damp powder. Put this in an evaporating dish or a crucible and apply heat, at first moderate, gradually increasing, stir frequently, and continue the heat until vapours of carbonate of ammonium can no longer be detected by hydrochloric acid. After cooling, dissolve the residue in distilled water, filter, and evaporate, stirring constantly towards the last, until a perfectly dry salt remains. The salt thus obtained is freely soluble in water and from it dilute hydrobromic acid can be prepared by simply decomposing it with the requisite amount of sulphuric acid. To prepare a 10 per cent, acid proceed as follows : — Bromide of barium ...... 148 grains. S ulphuric acid, U. S.P. (96 *8 per cent. HO.SOg) . 50‘6 grains. Distilled water .... a sufficient quantity. Dissolve the barium bromide in about ^ ounce, and dilute the acid with about 2 drachms of distilled water. Add the diluted sulphuric acid to the solution of the barium bro¬ mide, filter, and wash the precipitated barium sulphate with sufficient distilled water to make the filtrate weigh 810 grains. The commercial sulphuric acid usually being weaker than the officinal acid, more than the above quan¬ tity will be required to precipitate all the barium, and more diluted acid must therefore be added very carefully until it no longer produces a precipitate. By this method a perfectly pure hydrobromic acid can be prepared with¬ out distillation, provided, of course, the materials used are pure ; it is especially important that the carbonate of barium has been well washed, as the adhering chloride of sodium will otherwise contaminate the bromide of barium and also the hydrobromic acid. The 10 per cent, acid can by careful evaporation be concentrated so as to represt nt 30 per cent, or even more of hydrobromic acid gas. THE APPLICATION OF CHEMISTRY TO AGRICULTURE.* BY J. H. GILBERT, PH.D., F.R.S., V.P.C.S., F.L.S. Some of my predecessors in this chair, whose duties a teachers of chemistry lead them to traverse a wide range of the subject every year, have appropriately and usefully presented to the Section a resume of the then recent pro¬ gress in the manifold branches of the science which have now such far-reaching ramifications. Such a course has, however, come to be of much less importance and interest of late years since the systematic publication by the Chemical Society of abstracts of chemical papers in home and foreign journals as soon as possible after their appear¬ ance. Some, on the other hand, have confined attention to some department with which their own inquiries have more specially connected them. And, when the Council of the Association request a specialist like myself to un¬ dertake the Presidency of the Section, it is to be supposed they take it for granted that he will select for his opening address some branch of the subject with which he is known to be mainly associated. But it seems to me that there is a special reason why * Presidential Address delivered before the Chemical Section of the British Association, Swansea, 1880. I should bring the subject of Agricultural Chemistry before you on the present occasion. Not only is the application of chemistry to agriculture included in the title of this Section; but in 1837 the Committee of the Section requested the late Baron Liebig to prepare a re¬ port upon the condition of Organic Chemistry, and it is now exactly forty years since Liebig presented to the British Association the first part of his report, which was entitled * Organic Chemistry in its Application to Agriculture and Physiology ; ’ and the second part was presented two years later, in 1842, under the title of ‘Animal Chemistry, or Organic Chemistry in its Application to Physiology and Pathology.’ Yet so far as I am aware, no President of the Section has, from that time to the present, taken as a subject of his address the Application of Chemistry to Agriculture. Appropriate as, for these reasons, it would seem that I, who have devoted a very large portion of the interval since the publication of Liebig’s works, above referred to, to agricultural inquries, should occupy the short time that can be devoted to such a purpose in attempting to note progress on that important subject, it will be readily un¬ derstood that it would be quite impossible to condense into the limits of an hour’s discourse anything approach¬ ing to an adequate account, either of the progress made during the last forty years, or of the existing condition of agricultural chemistry. For what is agricultural chemistry ? It is the che¬ mistry of the atmosphere ; the chemistry of the soil ; the chemistry of vegetation; and the chemistry of animal life and growth. And but a very imperfect indication of the amount of labour which has been devoted of recent years to the investigation of these various branches of what might at first sight seem a limited subject will suffice to convince you how hopeless a task it would be to seek to do more than direct attention to a few points of special interest. Indeed, devoting to the purpose such leisure as I have been able to command, the more I have attempted to become acquainted with the vast literature which has been accumulated on the subject, the more difficulty have I felt in making a selection of illustrations which should best convey an idea of the limits, rather than of the extent, of the labour which has been expended, and of the results which have been attained, in agricultural research. The works of Liebig to which I have referred have, as you all know, been the subject of a very great deal of controversy. Agricultural chemists, vegetable physiolo¬ gists, and animal physiologists have each vehemently opposed some of the conclusions of the author, bearing upon their respective branches. But if the part which has fallen to my own lot in these discussions qualifies me at all to speak for others as well as myself, I would say that those who, having themselves carefully investigated the points in question, have the most prominently dis¬ sented from any special views put forward in those works, will — whether they be agricultural chemists, vegetable physiologists, or animal physiologists — be the first to admit how vast has been the stimulus, and how important has been the direction, given to research in their own depart¬ ment, by the masterly review of then existing knowledge, and the bold, and frequently sagacious, generalizations of one of the most remarkable men of his time ! Confining attention to researches bearing upon agricul¬ ture, it will be well, before attempting to indicate either the position established by Liebig’s first works, or the direction of the progress since made, to refer very briefly to the early history of the subject. From what we now know of the composition and of the sources of the constituents of plants, it is obvious that a knowledge of the composition of the atmosphere and of water was essential to any true conception of the main features of the vegetative process ; and it is of interest to observe that it was almost simultaneously with the establishment, towards the end of the last century, of definite knowledge as to the composition of the air and of water, that their mutual relations with vegetation were September 13, 1880.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL .JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 231 first pointed out. To the collective labours of Black, Scheele, Priestly, Lavoisier, Cavendish, and Watt, we owe the knowledge that common air consists chiefly of nitrogen and oxygen, with a little carbonic acid; that carbonic acid is composed of carbon and oxygen ; and that water is composed of hydrogen and oxygen ; whilst Priestly and Ingenhousz, Sennebier and Woodhouse, in¬ vestigated the mutual relations of these bodies and vege¬ table growth. Priestly observed that plants possessed the faculty of purifying air vitiated by combustion or by the respiration of animals ; and, he having discovered oxygen, it was found that the gaseous bubbles which Bonnet hac shown to be emitted from the surface of leaves plungec in water consisted principally of that gas. Ingenhousz demonstrated that the action of light was essential to the development of these phenomena; and Sennebier provec that the oxygen emitted resulted from the decomposition of the carbonic acid taken up. So far, however, attention seems to have been directec more prominently to the question of the influence of plants upon the media with which they were surrounded, than to that of the influence of those media in contribut¬ ing to the increased substance of the plants themselves. Towards the end of the last century, and in the beginning of the present one, De Saussure followed up these inquiries ; and in his work entitled, * Recherches Chimiques sur la V£g£tation,’ published in 1804, he may be said to have indicated, if not indeed established, some of the most important facts with which we are yet acquainted regarding the sources of the constituents stored up by the growing, plants. De Saussure illustrated experi¬ mentally, and even to some extent quantitatively, the fact that in sunlight plants increase in carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen, at the expense of carbonic acid and of water ; and in the case of his main experiment on the point, he found the increase in carbon, and in the elements of water, to be very closely in the proportion in which these are known to exist in the carbohydrates. He further maintained the essentialness of the mineral or ash constituents of plants ; he pointed out that they must be derived from the soil ; and he called attention to the probability that the incombustible constituents so derived by plants from the soil were the source of those found in the animals fed upon them. With regard to the nitrogen which plants had already been shown to contain, Priestly and Ingenhousz thought their experiments indicated that they absorbed free nitrogen from the atmosphere ; but Sennebier and Woodhouse arrived at an opposite conclusion. De Saussure, again, thought that his experiments showed rather an evolution of nitrogen at the expense of the sub¬ stances of the plant than any assimilation of it from gaseous media. He further concluded that the source of the nitrogen of plants was more probably the nitrogenous compounds in the soil, and the small amount of ammonia which he demonstrated to exist in the atmosphere. Upon the whole, De Saussure concluded that air and water contributed a much larger proportion of the dry substance of plants than did the soils in which they grew. In his view a fertile soil was one which yielded liberally to the plant nitrogenous compounds, and the incom¬ bustible or mineral constituents ; whilst the carbon hydrogen, and oxygen, of which the greater proportion of the dry substance of the plant was made up, were at least mainly derived from the air and water. Perhaps I ought not to omit to mention here that, each year for ten successive years, from 1802 to 1812, Sir Humphry Davy delivered a course of lectures on the * Elements of Agricultural Chemistry,’ which were first published in 1813, were finally revised by the author for the fourth edition in 1827, but have gone through several editions since. In those lectures, Sir Humphry Davy passed in review and correlated the then existing knowledge, both practical and scientific, bearing upon agriculture. He treated of the influences of heat and light ; of the organization of plants ; of the difference, and the change, in the chemical composition of their different parts : of the sources, composition, anl treatment of soils ; of the composition of the atmosphere, and its influence on vegetation ; of the composition and the action of manures ; of fermentation and putrefaction ; and finally of the principles involved in various recog¬ nized agricultural practices. With the exception of these discourses of Sir Humphry Davy, the subject seems to have received comparatively little attention, nor was any important addition made to our knowledge in regard to it during the period of about thirty years from the date of the appearance of De Saussure’s work in 1804 to that of the commencement of Boussingault’s investigations. About 1834, Boussingault became, by marriage, joint proprietor with his brother-in-law of the estate of Bechel- bronn, in Alsace. His brother-in-law, M. Lebel, was both a chemical manufacturer and an intelligent practical farmer, accustomed to use the balance for the weighing of manures, crops, and cattle. Boussingault seems to have applied himself at once to chemico- agricultural research ; and it was under these conditions of the association of “ practice with science ” that the first laboratory on a farm was established. Erom this time forward, Boussingault generally speht about half the year in Paris, and the other half in- Alsace ; and he has continued his scientific labours, sometimes in the city, and sometimes in the country, up to the present time. His first important contribution to agricultural chemistry was made in 1836, when he published a paper on the amount of nitrogen in different foods, and on the equivalence of the foods, founded on the amount of nitrogen they contained ; and he com¬ pared the results so arrived at with the estimates of others founded on actual experience. Although his conclusions on the subject have doubtless undergone modification since that time, the work itself marked a great advance on previously existing knowledge and modes of viewing the question. In 1837, Boussingault published papers — on the amount of gluten in different kinds of wheat, on the influence of the clearing of forests on the diminution of the flow of rivers, and on the meteorological influences affecting the culture of the vine. In 1838 he published the results of an elaborate research on the principles underlying the value of a rotation of crops. He de¬ termined by analysis the composition, both organic and inorganic, of the manures applied to the land, and of the crops harvested. In his treatment of the subject he evinced a clear perception of the most important prob¬ lems involved in such an inquiry ; some of which, with the united labour? of himself and many other workers, have scarcely yet received an undisputed solution. Thus, in the same year (1838), he published the results of an investigation on the question whether plants assimilate the free or uncombined nitrogen of the atmosphere ; and although the analytical methods of the day were inadequate to the decisive settlement of the point, his conclusions were in the main those which much subsequent work of his own, and much of others also, has served to confirm. As a further element of the question of the chemical statistics of a rotation of crops, Boussingault determined the amount and composition of the residues of various crops ; also the amount of constituents consumed in the : rood of a cow and of a horse respectively, and yielded in ;he milk and excretions of the cow, and in the excretions of the horse. Here, again, the exigencies of the investi¬ gation he undertook were beyond the reach of the known methods of the time. Indeed, rude as the art of agricul¬ ture is generally considered to be, the scientific elucida¬ tion of its practices requires the most refined, and very varied, methods of research ; and a characteristic of the work of Bossingault may be said to be, that he has frequently had to devise methods suitable to his purpose, before he could grapple with the problems before him. 232 TILE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [September is, iS80. In 1839, chiefly in recognition of his important con¬ tributions to agricultural chemistry, Boussingault was elected a member of the Institute; and in 1878, thirty- nine years later, the Council of the Royal Society awarded to him the Copley Medal, the highest honour at their disposal, for his numerous and varied contribu¬ tions to science, but especially for those relating to agriculture. The foregoing brief historical sketch is sufficient to indicate, though but in broad outline, the range of existing knowledge on the subject of agricultural chemistry prior to the appearance of Liebig’s memorable work in 1840. It will be seen that some very important and indeed fundamental facts had already been established in regard to vegatation, and that Boussingault had not only extended inquiry on that subject, but. he had brought his own and previous results to bear upon the elucidation of long recognized agricultural practices. There can be no doubt that the data supplied by his researches contributed important elements to the basis of established facts upon which Liebig founded his brilliant generalizations. Accordingly, in 1841, Dumas and Boussingault published, jointly, an essay which afterwards appeared in English under the title of ‘ The Chemical and Physiological Balance of Organic Nature ; ’ and, in 1843, Boussingault published a larger work, which embodied the results of many of his own previous original investigations. But there can be no doubt that the appearance of Liebig’s two works, which were contributions made in answer to a request submitted to him by the Committee of this Section of the British Association, constituted a very marked epoch in the history of the progress of agricultural chemistry. In the treatment of his subject he not only called to his aid the previously existing knowledge directly bearing upon it, but he also turned to good account the more recent triumphs of organic chemistry, many of which had been won in his own laboratory. Further, a marked feature of his expositions was the adoption of what may be called the statistical method — I use the statistical rather than quantitative, as the latter expression has its own technical meaning among chemists, which is not precisely what I wish to convey. It seems that, notwithstanding the conclusive evidence afforded by the direct experiments of De Saussure and his predecessors, vegetable physiologists continued to hold the view that the humus of the soil was the source of the carbon of vegetation. Not only did Liebig give full weight to the evidence of the experiments of De Saussure and others, and illustrate the possible or probable transformations within the plant already established in organic chemistry, but he demonstrated the utter impossibility of humus supplying the amount of carbon assimilated over a given area. He pointed out that humus itself was the product of previous vegetable growth, and that it could not therefore be an original source of carbon; and that, from the degree of its in¬ solubility, either in pure water or in water containing alkaline or earthy bases, only a small fraction of the carbon assimilated by plants could be derived from the amount of humus that could possibly enter the plant in solution. He maintained that so far as humus was beneficial to vegetation at all, it was only by its oxidation, and a consequent supply of carbonic acid within the soil ; a source which he considered only of importance in the early stages of the life of a plant, and before it had developed and exposed a sufficient amount of green surface to the atmosphere to render it independent of soil supplies of carbonic acid. With regard to the hydrogen of plants, at any rate that portion of it contained in their non-nitrogenous products, he maintained that its source must be water ; and that the source of the oxygen was either that con¬ tained in carbonic acid or that in water. With regard to the nitrogen of vegetation, both from the known characters of free nitrogen, and as he con¬ sidered a legitimate deduction from ’direct experiments* he argued that plants did not take up free or uncombined nitrogen, either from the atmosphere, or dissolved in water and so absorbed by the roots. The source of the nitrogen of vegetation was, he maintained, ammonia; the product of the putrefaction of one generation of plants and animals supplying the ammonia for the next. He pointed out that, in the case of a farm receiving 1 nothing from external sources, and selling off certain products, the amount of nitrogen in the manure derived by the consumption of some of the vegetable produce on the farm itself, together with that due to the refuse of the crops, must always be less than was contained in the ci-ops grown; and he concluded that though the quantity so returned to the land was important, a main source of the nitrogen assimilated over a given ai'ea was that brought down from the atmosphere in rain. There can be no doubt that, owing to the limited and defective experimental evidence then at command on the point, Liebig at that time (as he has since) greatly over¬ estimated the amount of ammonia available to vegeta¬ tion from that source. In Boussingault’s ‘reclamation' already referred to, he gave much more prominence to the importance of the nitrogen of manures. In Liebig’s next edition (in 1843) he combated the notion of the relative importance of the nitrogen of manures ; main¬ tained, in opposition to the view put forward in his former edition that the atmosphere afforded a sufficient supply of nitrogen for cultivated as well as for uncultivated plants ; that the supply was sufficient for the cereals as well as for leguminous plants ; that it was not necessary to supply nitrogen to the former ; and he insisted very much more strongly than formerly on the relative importance cf the supply of the incombustible, or, as he designated them, the “inorganic ’’ or “mineral,” constituents. As to the incombustible or mineral constituents them¬ selves, Liebig adduced many illustrations in proof of their essentialness. He called attention to the variation in the xom position of the ash of plants grown on different soils ; and he assumed a greater degree of mutual replaceability of one base by another, or of one acid by another, than could be now admitted. He traced the difference in the mineral composition of different soils to that of the rocks which had been their source ; and he seems to have been led by the consideration of the gradual action of “ weathering ,” in rendering available | the otherwise locked -up stores, to attribute the benefits of fallow exclusively to the increased supply of the in¬ combustible constituents which would by its agency be brought into a condition in which they could be taken up by plants. The benefits of an alternation of crops Liebig con¬ sidered to be in part explained by the influence of the excreted matters from one description of crop upon the growth of another. He did not attach weight to the assumption that such matters would be directly injurious to the same description of crop; but he supposed rather that the matters excreted were those which the plant did not need, and would therefore be of no avail to the same description of plant, but would be of use to another. He, however, attributed much of the benefits of a rotation to different mineral constituents being required from the soil by the respective crops. Treating of manure, he laid the greatest stress on the return by it of the potass and the phosphates removed by the crops. But he also insisted on the importance of the nitrogen, especially that in the liquid excretions of animals, and condemned the methods of treatment of animal manures by which the ammonia was allowed to be lost by evaporation. It is curious and significant, however, that some of the passages in his first edition, in which he the most forcibly urges the value of the nitrogen of animal manures, are omitted in the third and fourth editions. The discussion of the processes of fermentation, decay and putrefaction, and that of poisons, contagions, and September is, 18S0.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 23 i miasms, constituted a remarkable and important part of Liebig’s first report. It was the portion relating to poisons, contagions and miasms, that he presented to this Section as an instalment, at the meeting of the Association held at Glasgow in 1840. It was in the chapters relating to the several subjects here enumerated that he developed so prominently his views on the influence of contact in inducing chemical changes. He cited many known transformations, other than those coming under either of the heads in question, in illustra¬ tion of his subject ; and he discussed with great clearness the different conditions occurring, and the different results obtained, in various processes — such as the different modes of fermenting beer, the fermentation of wine frord different kinds of grapes, the production of acetic acid, etc. As is well known, he claimed a purely chemical explanation for the phenomena involved in fermentation. He further maintained that the action of contagions was precisely similar. In his latest writings on the subject (in 1870), he admits some change of view; but it is by no means easy to decide exactly how much or how little of modification he would wish to imply. Liebig’s second report, presented at the meeting of this Association in 1842, and published under the title of * Animal Chemistry, or Organic Chemistry in its applica¬ tions to Physiology and Pathology,’ perhaps excited even more attention than his first ; and, probably from the manner as much as from the matter, aroused a great deal of controversy, especially among physiologists and physicians. Liebig was severe upon what he considered to be a too exclusive attention to morphological characters in physiological research, and at any rate too little attention to chemical phenomena, and, so far as these were investigated, an inadequate treatment of the subject according to strictly quantitative methods. He combated the view that nervous action, as such, could be a source of any of the heat of the body ; and he adduced numerous illustrations and calculations in support of the view that the combustion. of carbon and hydrogen in the system was sufficient to account for, and was the only source of animal heat. He compared and contrasted the general composition of plants and animals. In accordance with Mulder, he pointed out that whilst plants formed the nitrogenous bodies which they contain from carbonic acid, water and ammonia, animals did not produce them, but received them ready -formed in their vegetable food ; that, in fact, the animal begins only where the plant ends. But, going beyond Mulder, and beyond what had then, or has since, been established, he maintained the identity in composition of the admittedly analogous nitrogenous compounds in plants and in the blood of animals. Omitting the fat which the carnivora might receive in the animals they consumed, he stated the characteristic difference between the food of carnivora and herbivora to be, that the former obtained the main proportion of their respiratory material from the waste of tissue ; whilst the latter obtained a large amount from starch, sugar, etc. These different conditions of life accounted for the com¬ parative leanness of carnivora and fatness of herbivora. He maintained that the vegetable food consumed by herbivora did not contain anything like the amount of fat which they stored up in their bodies ; and he showed how nearly the composition of fat was obtained by the simple elimination of so much oxygen, or of oxygen and a little carbonic acid, from the various carbohydrates. Much less oxygen would be required to be eliminated from a quantity of fibrine, etc., containing a given amount of carbon, than from a quantity of carbohydrates containing an equal amount of carbon. The formation of fatty matter in plants was of the same kind ; it was the result of a secondary action, starch being first formed from carbonic acid and water. He concluded from the facts adduced that the food of man might be divided into the nitrogenized and the non-nitrogenized elements. The former were capable of conversion into blood, the latter incapable of such trans¬ formation. The former might be called the plastic elements of nutrition, the latter elements of respiration. From the plastic elements, the membranes and cellular tissue, the nerves and brain, cartilage, and the organic part of bones, could be formed ; but the plastic substance must be received ready-made. Whilst gelatine or chondrine was derived from fibrine or albumen, fibrine or albumen could not be reproduced from gelatine or chondrine. The gelatinous tissues suffer progressive alteration under the influence of oxygen, and the materials for their re-forma¬ tion must be restored from the blood. It might, how¬ ever, be a question whether gelatine taken in food might not again be converted into cellular tissue, membrane, and cartilage in the body. At that time, adopting and attaching great importance to Mulder’s views in regard to proteine, he says : — “All the organic nitrogenized constituents of the body, how different soever they may be in composition, are derived 1 from proteine. They are formed from it by the addition : or subtraction of the elements of water or of oxygen, and by resolution into two or more compounds.” He seeks to trace the changes occurring in the conversion : of the constituents of food into blood, of those of blood into the various tissues, and of these into the secretions and excretions. He states that the process of chymification takes place in virtue of a purely chemical action, exactly similar to those processes of decomposition or transformation which are known as putrefaction, fermentation, or decay. Thus, the clear gastric juice contains a substance in a state ! of transformation, by the contact of which with the insoluble constituents of the food they are rendered soluble, no other element taking any share in the action excepting oxygen and the elements of water. All substances which can arrest the phenomena of fermenta¬ tion and putrefaction in liquids, also arrest digestion when taken into the stomach. Putrefying blood, white of egg, flesh, and cheese, produce the same effects in a | solution of sugar as yeast or ferment ; the explanation being, that ferment, or yeast, is nothing but vegetable fibrine, albumen, or caseine, in a state of decomposition. Referring to the derivation of the animal tissues, he I says they all contain, for a given amount of carbon, more i oxygen than the nitrogenous constituents of blood. In hair and gelatinous membrane there is also an excess of nitrogen and hydrogen, and in the proportions to form ammonia. We may suppose an addition of these elements, or a subtraction of carbon, the amount of nitrogen remain¬ ing the same. The gelatinous substance is not a compound of proteine ; it contains no sulphur, or phosphorus ; and it contains more nitrogen, or less carbon than proteine. He next, as he says, attempts to develop analytically the principal metamorphoses which occur in the animal body. He adds that the results have surprised himself no less than they will others, and have excited in his own mind the same doubts as others will conceive. He nevertheless gives them, because he is convinced that the method by which they have been obtained is the only one by which we can hope to acquire an insight into the nature of organic processes. Referring to the animal secretions, he argues that they must contain the products of the metamorphosis of the tissues. He says a starving man with severe exertion secretes more urea than the most highly fed individual in a state of rest ; and he combats the idea that the nitrogen of the food can pass into urea without having previously become part of an organized tissue. Having shown the chemical relations of bile and urine to the proteine bodies, he illustrates, by formulae, the connection between allantoine and the constituents of the urine of animals that respire. He insists that in the herbivora the carbohydrates must take part in the formation of bile ; and he calculates the number of equivalents of proteine, starch, oxygen, and water, which would yield a given number of equivalents of urea 234 THU PHARMAOEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [September is, 1880. choleic acid, ammonia, and carbonic acid. The non- nitrogenous constituents in the food of the herbivora retard the metamorphosis of the nitrogenous bodies, rendering this less rapid than iii the carnivora. It may be said that proteine, starch, and oxygen give the secretions and excretions, carbonic acid by the lungs, urea and carbonate of ammonia by the kidneys, choleic acid by the liver. It is the study of the phenomena which accompany the metamorphoses of the food in the •organism, the discovery of the share which the atmo¬ sphere and the elements of water take in these changes, by' which we shall learn the conditions necessary for the production of a secretion or of an organized part. He traces the possible formation of taurine from caffeine or asparagine by their assumption of oxygen and of the elements of water. And from the composition of the vegetable alkaloids he suggests the possibility of their taking a share in the formation of new, or the transforma¬ tion of existing, brain and nervous matter. Finally, in reference to these various illustrations and considerations, he says, however hypothetical they may appear, they deserve attention in so far as they point out the way which chemistry must pursue if she would really be of service to physiology and pathology. Chemistry, he says, relates to the conversion of food into the various tissues and secretions, and to their subsequent metamorphosis into lifeless compounds. After this lapse of time, it will certainly be granted that, quite irrespectively of the admissibility or otherwise of the particular illustration adduced, or of the truth or error of any of the conclusions drawn — and some at least are so true that they seem to us now all but truisms, and you may be disposed to ask me why I should tell you over again a story so often told before — there is no doubt that Liebig’s manner of treating the subject did exert an immense influence by stimulating investigation, by fixing attention on the points to be investigated, and on the methods that must be followed, and thus by leading to the establishment or the correction of any special views he put forward, and to a vast extension of our knowledge on the complicated questions involved. In the third part of Liebig’s second volume he treats of the phenomena of motion in the animal organism. It is to his views in regard to one aspect only of this very wide and very complicated subject that I propose to call your attention here, as it is chiefly in so far as that aspect is concerned that the question is of interest from the point of view of the agricultural chemist. He says : — “ We observe in animals that the conversion of food into blood, and the contact of the blood with the living tissues, are determined by a mechanical force, whose manifestation proceeds from distinct organs, and is effected by a distinct system of organs, possessing the property of communicating and extending the motion which they receive. We find the power of the animal to change its place and to produce mechanical effects by means of its limbs dependent on a second similar system of organs or apparatus.” He points out that the motion of the animal fluids proceeds from distinct organs (as, for example, that of the blood from the heart), which do not generate the force in themselves, but receive it from other parts by means of the nerves ; the limbs also receive their moving force in the same way. He adds: — “Where nerves are not found, motion does not occur.” Again: — “ As an immediate effect of the manifestation of mechanical force, we see that a part of the muscular substance loses its vital properties, its character of life : that this portion separates from the living part, and loses its capacity of growth and its power of resistance. We find that this change of properties is accompanied by the entrance of. a foreign body (oxygen) into the composition of the muscular fibre . . ; and all experience proves that this conversion of living muscular fibre into com¬ pounds destitute of vitality is accelerated or retarded according to the amount of force employed to produce motion.” He adds that a rapid transformation of muscular fibre determines a greater amount of mechanical force, and that conversely a greater amount of mechanical motion determines a more rapid change of matter. “ The change of matter, the manifestation of mechani¬ cal force, and the absorption of oxygen, are, in the animal body, so closely connected with each other that we may consider the amount of motion and the quantity of living tissue transformed as proportional to the quan¬ tity of oxygen inspired and consumed in a given time by the animal.” Again : — “The production of heat and the change of matter are closely related to each other ; but although heat can be produced in the body without any change of matter in living tissues, yet the change of matter cannflt be sup¬ posed to take place without the co-operation of oxygen.” Further, on the same point : — “ The sum of force avail¬ able for mechanical purposes must be equal to the sum of the vital forces of all tissues adapted to the change of matter. If, in equal times, unequal quantities of oxygen are consumed, the result is obvious in an unequal amount of heat liberated, and of mechanical force. When unequal amounts of mechanical force are expended, this determines the absorption of corresponding and unequal quantities of oxygen.” $ Then, more definitely still, referring to the changes which take place coincidently with the exercise of force, and to the demands of the system for repair accordingly, he says : — “The amount of azotized food necessary to restore the equilibrium between waste and supply is directly proportional to the amount of tissues metamorphosed. The amount of living matter, which in the body loses the condition of life, is, in equal temperatures, directly pro¬ portional to the mechanical effects produced in a given time. The amount of tissue metamorphosed in a given time may be measured by the quantity of nitrogen in the urine. The sum of the mechanical effects produced in two individuals, in the same temperature, is proportional to the amount of nitrogen in their urine, whether the mechanical force has been employed in the voluntary or involuntary motions, whether it has been consumed by the limbs, or by the heart and other viscera.” Thus, apparently influenced by the physiological con¬ siderations which have been adduced, and notwithstanding in some passages he seemed to recognize a connection between the total quantity of oxygen inspired and con¬ sumed and the quantity of mechanical force developed, Liebig nevertheless very prominently insisted that the amount of muscular tissue transformed — the amount of nitrogenous substance oxidated — was the measure of the force generated. He accordingly distinctly draws the conclusion that the requirement for the azotized con¬ stituents of food will be increased in proportion to the increase in the amount of force expended. It will be obvious that the question whether in the feeding of animals for the exercise of mechanical force, that is, for their labour, the demands of the system will be proportionally the greater for an increased supply of the nitrogenous or of the non-nitrogenous constituents of food, is one of considerable interest and practical import¬ ance. To this point I shall have to refer further on. [To be continued.) QUASSIA v. MOSQUITOES. An infusion of 1 pound of quassia to 8 gallons of water has been recently recommended, not only as a preventive of blight in plants and as effectual against green fly and other insects, but when applied to the face and hands as a thorough protection against mosquitoes. The editor of the Canadian Pharmaceutical Journal says, “ This may be all very well for English gnats, but we fancy that the American insect, that bites through a pair of cow hide boots soaked in carbolic acid, will pay very little attention to common house-fly poison.” !' ! September 18, 1880.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 235 Cj }t jmrttmcwtkal Jmirmil. - ♦ - SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 1880. Communications for . the Editorial department of this Journal, books for review , etc., should be addressed to the Editor, 17, Bloomsbury Square. Instructions from Members and Associates respecting the transmission of the Journal should be sent to Mr. Elias Bremridge, Secretary, 17, Bloomsbury Square, W.C. Advertisements, and payments for Copies of the Journal , Messrs. Churchill, New Burlington Street, London, W. Envelopes indorsed “ Pharm. JournJ MEDICO-PHARMACEUTICAL ABUSES IN THE UNITED STATES. The Philadelphia Medico-Legal Society is a society of which we confess we know little beyond the fact that it appears to rejoice in a rather high-sounding title, and that it would seem to have adopted and made public a report from a committee on the subject of medico-pharmaceutical abuses. W e intend to show no disrespect to this society therefore when we say that its ordinary proceedings and conclusions would not be likely to present many features of interest to the readers of this Journal, and we propose to refer to the report — which in its literary style and the faith manifested by the reporters in the efficiency of some of their conclusions betrays considerable traces of juvenility — only because it discusses several topics that are of importance to pharmacists on this side of the Atlantic as well as the other. The report commences by drawing attention to some “ mistakes ” into which physicians are alleged to have perhaps unconsciously drifted. The first “mistake” charged against the physician is that, unlike as “in the earlier days of the healing art, “ when the professional status of medical men was “ animated by a higher atmosphere of professional “ tone,” he now, by allowing the compounding and dispensing to drift into the pharmacists’ hands, has practically delegated to another class almost the exclusive management of the therapeutics of medical practice and has abdicated the driving of the medical team. Moreover, it is alleged that the physician has by the system of prescription writing cultivated in the public the habit of relying upon the judgment of the pharmacist, and developed so much confidence in his discretion and skill that to a large degree the pharmacist and not the physician has become the one consulted for remedies and treatment. Another consequence of this enhanced importance of the druggist is said to be that he is able to select a particular physician and specially “run” him to the detriment of his less favoured confreres. The suggestion implied in the first of these allega¬ tions, that each physician should, like his earliest predecessors in the practice of the healing art or a modern Indian “medicine man,” prepare as well as -dispense and prescribe his medicines is one that not even the countenance of a medico-legal society can render worthy of discussion. As to the conse¬ quence said to follow the increased confidence in the pharmacist, due to his being entrusted with the making up of physicians’ prescriptions, it may safely be said that, whatever may be the case in Pennsyl¬ vania, in this country there would be nothing so conducive to the reduction of counter practice within the narrowest limits as the fuller occupation of the pharmacist in his more congenial and natural func¬ tion of dispensing. At any rate, it is not quite clear how the proclivities of the pharmacist towards “running” a particular physician can be compatible with his greed for prescribing himself. Another mistake attributed to the physician we can only mention, since criticism of the allegation lies outside our domain. It is the practice of charging round fees for professional visits, even when there is little occasion for such visits, and the prescribing of unnecessarily large quantities of expensive drugs. This, it is alleged, builds up the business of the druggist, while it depletes the pocket of the patient and drives him to the patent medicine vendor or the homceopathist. The last mistake, alleged, however, only against some Philadelphia physicians, is that they have smirched the reputation of the profession by making a dirty compact with unscrupulous druggists for a percentage on prescriptions diverted to the stores of the latter. A similar “ mistake ” has been heard of in this country, but when we read that in Phila¬ delphia such prescriptions are made up at excessive prices, and that bottles and boxes of unused medi¬ cine are needlessly set aside by the astute doctor at successive visits to be substituted by others no less expensive, we are reminded of the paradoxical “ deeper still ” of the lowest depths. The report next draws attention to a series of complaints which it is considered physicians are entitled to make against druggists in respect to various customs that injuriously affect the profes¬ sional and business functions of the medical practi¬ tioner, and the first of these relates to unfaithfulness in making up prescriptions. The report here takes a hypothetical form, and says that if an expensive drug be prescribed and a cheaper be substituted, if preparations not up to the standard formulae be used, or if one preparation be substituted for another not in stock, the pharmacist so doing practises a deception wholly at variance with his duties as a compounder. With this opinion we entirely concur, but cannot help remarking that there is much virtue in the “if,” and that otherwise the complaint has hardly a fair raison $ tre, for whilst upon mere conjecture it ought not to be made, with certainty as to such a practice by any pharmacist the remedy would lie in the prescriber’s hands. The subject of the next complaint is the repeti¬ tion of prescriptions by pharmacists without the order of the prescriber, and it is urged that there 236 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [September U, mo. can be no doubt that a vicious habit of consuming narcotics or alcohol has been in numerous cases engendered by this practice, and further that many persons have undoubtedly been permanently injured by overdrugging the system with remedies, potent in themselves as correctives of diseased con¬ ditions, but contra-indicated except where used under the observation of a prudent prescriber. In the opinion of the reporters the pharmacist who makes up a prescription repeatedly without fresh instructions from the prescriber, or who dispenses it for a person for whom it was not originally pre¬ scribed, “ assumes an unwarranted responsibility “ wholly impertinent to the province of his vocation “ as a responder to the dicta of the physician, who “adapted his prescription to the indications of a “ particular case.” This question of repeating pre¬ scriptions is, however, one that cannot be settled by simple denunciation of pharmacists by the medical profession ; it is one upon which the public will have its say as a party concerned. Moreover it cannot be maintained that the objections urged apply to all prescriptions to the same extent, and in the case of a prescription likely to prove hurtful if indiscrimin¬ ately repeated, the medical man always has it in his power at least to order it not to be dispensed more than once. But the complaint which is made in the bitterest tones has for its theme the sale of patent and pro¬ prietary medicines, and the injury caused to regular practice and the general medical profession by the part pharmacists have taken in this traffic is warmly denounced and described as beyond computation. “Was the pushing or sale of patent nostrums the “object of the pharmaceutist’s studies and graduation!” it is indignantly asked ; whilst the two succeeding questions, “ Who is it that has trained the people “to go to drug stores for all the paraphernalia of “ patent medicine makers ?” and “ Who is it that is “ever putting the endlessness of these stuffs into stock “ and introducing them to the people for percentages on sales 1 ” recall the style of a ditty that once had considerable popularity in the nursery. Notwith¬ standing, however the virago shrillness of the scolding there is some justice in this remonstrance against the progressive development of the nostrum trade, which, however, has had its abettors among the members of the medical profession also, and the pharmacists of this country are at last becoming alive to the fact that although it for a time presented an alluring prospect it is destructive to the best interests of true pharmacy. We have thus referred to the principal points in this report, not because we are inclined to attribute to it any factitious importance, but because it seemed to have some interest as showing that the trans¬ atlantic “medico-pharmaceutical abuses” are very similar in their nature to grievances that are not unfrequently put forward in this country. So far as these grievances are real, every well wisher to the art of medicine — and pharmacy as a part of it — will be desirous of their removal. But in our opinion this will not be effected by the opening of opposition drug stores or the drawing up of a black list of offending pharmacists, as proposed by the present reporters, but by cultivating an increase in the mutual respect and confidence between prescribers and dispensers, and the entrusting of dispensing more entirely to the pharmacists’ hands, notwith¬ standing that the reporters curiously enough indicate a similar course in the past as having been the origin of the evils lamented. ALLEGED MISUSE OF PILOCARPINE. An inquiry has been in progress in Cork, which turns upon a point not without its interest to those inclined to experiment with new remedies. It ap¬ pears, according to the account given in The Times of Thursday last, that a boy who was admitted to the Fever Hospital during the recent epidemic of scar¬ latina in Cork came under the attention of Dr. McNaughton Jones, who considered him to be suffering from suppressed scarlatina. Dr. Jones prescribed the usual remedies at first, but afterwards, regarding the case as a serious one and thinking the boy not likely to recover, he decided to inject pilo¬ carpine subcutaneously. A ten per cent, solution was after some difficulty obtained and equal to one-tliird of a grain of the alkaloid injected under the patient’s skin. According to the evidence of the resident surgeon of the hospital the injection was followed by a marked change for the worse; the child be¬ came delirious and a cold clammy perspiration, with extreme depression of the vital powers, no pulse and great restlessness followed. Death super¬ vened in five hours. A charge was then brought forward by the father of the boy that Dr. Jones had caused the death of the child by the adminis¬ tration of the pilocarpine, and the investigation which has been conducted by the committee of the Hospital has already occupied five days. In support of the charge it was alleged that Dr. Jones had used the pilocarpine as a simple experiment ; that he had no experience in the hypodermic use of the drug and that he had adopted the novel treat¬ ment without consultation with his colleagues. On the other hand it was contended that the injection of pilocarpine was neither novel nor dangerous, and various authorities were quoted for its use in scar¬ latina and exanthematous fevers where there is a suppression of the eruption. Dr. Jones also said that he had frequently used it before in the treatment of ophthalmic diseases. The treatment adopted by Dr. Jones was endorsed by Professor O’Keefe, of Queen’s College, Cork, as well as by Dr. Duffey, of Mercer’s Hospital, Dublin. The inquiry, so far as taking evidence is concerned, is understood to be closed, but at the time of writing the committee had not given its decision. September is, 1880.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 237 jmmbtngs of Sdcnftfk Stfrictbs, BRITISH PHARMACEUTICAL CONFERENCE. [Continued from page 221.) The next paper read was entitled — The Restoration of Discoloured Syrup of Iodide of Iron. BY THOS. B. GROVES, F.C.S. Numberless articles by accredited writers in the Pharmaceutical Journal and elsewhere have shown that the preparation of a nearly colourless syrup of iodide of iron is not a difficult matter, and there has been a pretty general concurrence in the belief that the process of the British Pharmacopoeia leaves little to be desired. As to its keeping properties, there has been and probably there still is a good deal of difference of opinion ; some going so far as to say that it keeps perfectly well, and needs no special precaution for its preservation, whilst others have devised elaborate ways of bottling and storing or chemical treatment intended to enable the pharmacist to dispense a creditable article when called upon by the prescriber. It is doubtless true that when made with pure sugar, a substance by-the-bye difficult at all times to procure, the syrup, when in reasonable demand, does keep fairly well, so well in fact that well accustomed dispensing establish¬ ments fail to see any difficulty in the matter. Such, however, is not the case with those who perhaps are not called upon to dispense the article once in a month, or even less frequently. Then on searching the cupboard it is often found that the syrup without some treatment is not presentable, and frequently it happens that for want of knowing what to do in the case the syrup is sacrificed and the patient incommoded. With the view of assisting my brother pharmacists when in this dilemma I venture to offer a few observations. I must, however, confess that instances have to my knowledge occurred where the pharmacist has not been too scrupulous, and ignoring the refinements of pharmacy has not hesitated to supply his customer with a discoloured syrup. I have myself been hauled over the coals for supplying a colour¬ less and comparatively flavourless article, “apparently not so strong as Mr. Dash’s”; in fact have suffered for a time, as did George the First’s cooks, who supplied his majesty’s table with fresh oysters, “not so ’igh in flaviour” as those to which his Hanoverian Highness had been accustomed. The discoloration of syrup of iodide of iron is doubtless due mainly to the presence of free iodine ; when turbidity is present there is probably also a basic persalt of iron in suspension which adds to the effect. To get rid of both of these it is only necessary to dilute the syrup with say a third of its volume of water, to boil briskly for a few minutes, then filter through paper, and finally reduce by evaporation to its original bulk. The syrup will then have resumed its original appearance. The strength of the preparation will not have been materially altered by this treatment, for it takes a wonderfully small quantity of iodine in the free state to colour a large amount of liquid. Thus it will be found that one drop of liquor ferri perchloridi added to half a fluid ounce of freshly prepared syrup of iodide of iron will produce in it the tint of golden sherry, to be completely dissipated by a few minutes’ boiling. There is, I am aware, nothing new in this treatment by boiling, etc. ; it has, I know, been mentioned already by some writer whose name I have unhappily forgotten, but whose useful though often unused suggestion has not escaped me. I will now refer to some experiments I have recently made in the same direction, and having for their object the avoidance of the delay attendant on the process already mentioned. The text-books tell us that when a persalt of iron is brought in contact with a soluble iodide, the salt is reduced to the proto condition, and free iodine is eliminated. It was at one time thought that under these circumstances a per-iodide was formed, but Mr. Squire, junr., some years since proved conclusively that such was not the case by showing that the colour could be removed from such a liquid by simply shaking it with an ordinary solvent for iodine such as benzine or chloro¬ form. If to such a liquid containing iodine in solution, caustic potash or soda be added, precipitation of ferric oxide will result, and the iodine will combine with the base of tie precipitant. Applied to a discoloured syrup of iodide of iron the process does not answer, and that in consequence of the sugar, as it appears to me, exercising a solvent action on the precipitated oxides. In fact it is after filtration more discoloured than ever. In a paper published in the ninth volume, second series, of the Pharmaceutical Journal (“Preservation of Syrup of Iodide of Iron”), I pointed out the effect pro¬ duced by the presence in the syrup of a trace of phosphoric acid, how that by seizing at the moment of its forma¬ tion the peroxide of iron and rendering it insoluble, it effectually prevented the reaction ending in the elimina¬ tion of free iodide that would otherwise have resulted. Syrup, even dilute, will keep for years after being so treated, but of course one gets instead of the discolora¬ tion the slight turbidity occasioned by the deposit of perphosphate of iron ; this however, being colourless and easy of removal by deposit or filtration, is of but little moment. Addition of phosphoric acid to syrup already discoloured is of no avail; the mischief has been done and no persalt remains for it to act upon. If, however, previous to the addition of the acid, a few drops of liquor potassse be stirred into the syrup the colour disappears almost immediately, and, the acid being in slight excess, will not again return. Thus I found by experiment that when to half a fluid ounce of syrup discoloured by one drop of liquor ferri perchloridi, I added enough liquor potassse (the amount would vary according to the acidity of the syrup) to produce a distinct greenish coloration, the further addition of two drops of dilute phosphoric acid restored the syrnp to its original tint. The use of hyposulphite for this purpose is of course well known, but its employment is in my opinion not so recommendable as that I have just described. The paper will, I fear, be regarded as simply hateful and utterly unorthodox by the few ; but the many will, I hope, not be displeased to learn how of two evils to choose the less. The President said the thanks of the Conference were due to Mr. Groves for this paper, which was interesting pharmaceutically to them all. There were two very important points in it, — one the decoloration of the coloured syrup, and the other the question of the purity of sugar. The latter had no doubt presented itself to all pharmacists who had endeavoured to obtain pure sugar. Mr. Umney said that from 70 to 80 per cent, of the sugar of commerce at the present day was beet sucrose, and such would not do for the manufacture of syrup of iodide of iron, so far as his experience went. He had seen a syrup made from this sugar, even when it had been brought most accurately to the proper specific gravity, become after a time perfectly solid. He had compared it with syrup made in exactly the same way from English refined cane sucrose, and the same result did not take place. He had not had an opportunity of investigating whether this was due to the presence of inverted sugar in the beet sucrose, but perhaps some one could throw some light upon the question. Mr. Hughes said he used Martineau’s sugar in making all his syrups. Mr. Andrews could quite corroborate what Mr. Umney said. He had had a great deal of trouble with various syrups, and particularly with syrup of the phos¬ phates and Easton’s syrup, from discoloration. He had^ 238 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. September 18, 1880. in fact, commenced a series of experiments on the subject, intending to communicate the results to that meeting, but pressure of other business, public and private, had prevented his completing the investigation. He felt sure, however, that such a paper would be most valuable. He had adopted the plan of procuring his sugar from one of the large lozenge houses in London, for he could not get it pure from the neighbouring grocers, and by getting better sugar his results were much more favourable. Mr. Naylor said he had noticed latterly amongst the sugar which had come into the market, especially Ame¬ rican sugar, that it contained an appreciable quantity of sulphur ; and when a syrup had been made containing acid salts, such as hypophosphites or phosphorous acid, where the phosphorous acid was somewhat in excess, after a time the syrup had become turbid and had given off sulphuretted hydrogen. He had not estimated the quan¬ tity, but it was quite sufficient to be detected by the smell, and of course it could be readily detected by the ordinary tests, such as acetate of lead. There ap¬ peared to him to be very considerable difficulty in ob¬ taining pure cane sugar. There was a difficulty in getting any quantity of Ma.rtineau’s sugar, according to his ex¬ perience, but he should like to know the opinion of those wh Prov. de Yungas, 1851. „ morada ) „ morada Prov. de Larecaja, 1851. Ledger thus describesf what he calls the “rojo”: — “‘ When in flower the leaves are red underneath. When the seed is ripe and the leaves falling they are a dark purple. Old trees in particular have on the branches a species of rough moss of a brilliant scarlet colour.” This is called Hypochnus rubrocinctus and is repre¬ sented on the Calisaya in Goebel’s Pharmaceutische Waarenkunde. It used to be looked upon by dealers in London as a necessary indication of the best calisaya. Ledger also speaks of the red and dark green leaves as peculiar to this cinchona.- “I have often” he says, “ seen, when in the Yungas, from the fork of a high tree, the manchas far away denoted most clearly by the wind discovering the red colour under the leaves.” Mr. Ledger sent me, in 1877, specimens of calisaya, * A tree of Hasskarliana, aged seventeen years, gave Moens 95 lbs. of dry bark.— Ceylon Observer, June 14, 1880; Pharm. Journ . and Trans., March 13, 1880. f In letter, November 24, 1875. two of which were of the “rojo” sort with white flowers ; but all were unfortunately lost in transit. The white flowering calisayas would probably be the true Ledgeriana, and gathered near the banks of Mamore.* * * § I am more and more inclined to think that the true Ledgeriana belongs to Eastern Bolivia, to which district the River Mamore belongs. It will therefore be understood that the cultivation in Bolivia, although comprising fairly good qualities of calisaya, is not that of Ledgeriana , nor can it yield such remarkable results. A very important reflection is that the cultivation is nevertheless remunerative, and capable of easy and of indefinite extension. The only chance for Indian cultiva¬ tion in the future consists in the choice of superior sorts, and the efficacy of high cultivation. If these requisites are attended to, considering the greater facilities in India of conveyance to the markets, there is no doubt a great future open to both countries. It will also be evident that there is practically no limit to the age up to which the calisaya may go on yielding serviceable bark. It does not change with age like the succirubra. This is owing to the difference in the tannic acid. In Bolivia, as in Java, attention is paid to the effectual drainage of the roots. Mr. Ledger says :f — “ I think you should advise all parties forming plantations to plant on slopes or sides of hills. I never have seen the trees growing on flats or the bottoms of gullies. Too much damp at roots is fatal. Almost all the largest and best ‘ patches ’ of cinchona are found on red (dark) soil. The bottoms are black soil.” Examination of a calisaya grown by Captain Cox in Wynaad, in the latter conditions, singularly confirmed to me this observation. Mr. Mclvor’s experience led him to the same con¬ clusion. He says,J after visiting Ceylon : — “ The red and crown barks seem to do best in Ceylon as they do here. But on the whole our cinchona plantations on the Nilghiris give promise of better results than the Ceylon plantations. Ceylon is wanting in the deep rich soils we possess, and cinchona is very liable to canker when the roots get down into the subsoil.” I fear that this must be admitted to have been the cause of “canker” in my Calisaya Anglica also. Perhaps in forming the bed, I did not pay sufficient attention to obviating this evil, and it is certain that one deep root found its it way beyond where I could easily trace it. In a recently prepared bed I have at length effectually shut out the possibility of such mischief. The following table§ of the average prices obtained for the 100,000 half kilos of bark sent home from Java, in 1878, will give a fair idea of the relative value of the different sorts there cultivated : — Succirubra . . . . 175 per cent, per half kilo. Calisaya Javanica . . 1'38 „ „ ,. „ Josephiana . 1*20 „ „ „ ,, Anglica . , 1 58 ,, ,, ,, „ Ledgeriana . 6 ’31 „ „ „ Cinchona Hasskarliana 1*23 „ „ ,» ,, officinalis . 2*80 „ „ „ „ lancifolia . 1*59 „ „ ,, . „ oaloptera . 1*35 „ „ „ „ Pahudiana . 170 ,, „ ,, By this it will be seen that the Ledgeriana greatly exceeds all the others, and that it equals or excels the cul¬ tivated calisaya of Bolivia ; but the average of this sort now sent will be much higher, if I may judge from that now selling at Amsterdam. I wish this remark, however, only to apply to the true Ledgeriana, for which as much as 15s. per pound has just been paid at Amsterdam; but in packages recently * See Ledger’s letter, December 22, 1874. f In letter, December 10, 1879. % In letter to myself, March 16, L76. § Ceylon Observer , June 15, 1880. 246 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [September 13, 1880-. bought under this name I find samples at a lower price exactly reproducing the finer calisayas of which I have bean treating; but containing not more than half the quinine of the ledgeriana. I have examined the officinalis bark from the same sale and find. that it resembles in appearance the “knotty sort of Jussieu.” It has no reference whatever to the true C. officinalis. I am persuaded that this (the Uritusinga) has never found its way to Java. In all that I have seen from thence and in the excellent botanical specimens given me I find the angustifolia indeed, but no trace of the Uritusinga. The important question of the relative proportion of supply to demand will gradually enforce upon the planters the necessity of cultivating none but the best species. I have long been insisting on this point both as to the cultivation in Java* and in India. The prospects of the future in Ceylon are almost alarming, at least if we may trust the calculations of Mr. Dobree, Dikoya, Ceylon; published in the Ceylon Observer of June 15th, 1880. He says : — “I see by your Directory of 1876-78 that you esti¬ mate the total consumption of cinchona bark for the world at 12,624,000 lbs. In Dikoya and Maskiliza dis¬ tricts alone, during 1880, I believe I am under the mark in saying that there will be 6,000,000 cinchonas, exclusive of those planted in previous years. “ Nearly every other district in the island is also planting cinchonas ; and I do not think I am over-esti¬ mating the number of cinchonas that will be planted in 1880 throughout the island at 20,000,000 ; allow 5,000,000 for failures, and add 5,000,000 for plants planted in pre¬ vious years and now alive, and it will give you 20,000,000 cinchona trees, which in five years will yield either by taking strips, or mossing, or by the shaving process, about 10,000,000 lbs. of dry bark a year. “ Again, referring to your Directory, I see you esti¬ mate the production of cinchona bark for the world at 12,471,000, of which Ceylon is put down for 150,000 ; but when it produces 10,000,000, as I believe it will, in 1885, the total production of the world will exceed the demand of 1876-78 by 10,847,000 lbs.” It is proverbially uncertain to count one’s chickens before they are hatched, and, considering the enormous mortality overtaking the plant (occasionally, if I mistake not, amounting to 90 per cent.), I think the ahove calcu¬ lation far too sanguine ; but, supposing it is correct (for argument sake) to the extent of one-half the estimate, I think I foresee one result. I do not choose to predict — as I never like to do this unless I am sure that my pre¬ dictions will come to pass — but I think I may fairly anticipate crowded sales-rooms in this market in 1885, at which the representatives of various quinine manufac¬ turers are attending, with the portentous word “rubbish” as a pencil note attached to certain vast consignments of Ceylon bark. For proof of the probability of this anticipation, I refer to the account I have given of the whole of last year’s importations in the Gardeners' Chronicle. No doubt much good and profitable bark will also be imported (as now is the case) from Ceylon, and probably this will keep up its price, or nearly so. Dr. Trimen informs me that he has two new plantations of Ledgeriana under his care, which are looking very well at present. Abundant in¬ formation will be found in the Ceylon Observer + as to the successful efforts of private planters, on which I must not enlarge ; but remark, by the way, that renewed officinalis bark from Prospect estate, on the Nilgiris, lately sold as high as 12s. 6d. per lb. This was from the true officinalis defined and published as such by Sir Jos. Hooker, and well described since in Bentley and Trimen’s ‘ Medicinal Plants.’ It is the Uritusinga of the ‘ Nueva Quinologia ’ of Pavon : and this name was retained by Mclvor, from whom (before his lamented death) I received excellent * Pharmaceutical Journal. f June 15, 1880. specimens grown under his care. It is at the present time flourishing with me, and deserves no doubt the description given by a planter* as being “the largest leaved variety of the true officinalis.”+ I have leaves up to 9 inches by 6. I observe with pleasure that this writer (W. B. L., of Leangapilla, Ranjala,) says, “ I think it by far the most profitable kind to grow in j Ceylon.” No doubt both this and bark properly renewed from C. succirubra will always command a good price in the market, as being rich in produce of alkaloid suited to the quinine manufacturer. On the whole I think it is evident that the true calisaya will assert its supremacy as the prince, or, as I should call it, the queen of all the cinchonas. Such. 1: indeed is the import of its name as “ the best of all barks ” for the production of quinine. It is also quite clear that we are as correct in ascribing to Mr. Ledger the introduction of the unrivalled Ledgeriana as we are in speaking of Columbus as the discoverer of America. Mr* L. has the merit of employing the accurate discernment of his faithful Indian servant for collecting the very best seed ; and in this he has shown the importance of know¬ ing how to employ and to trust good subordinates — a secret of success in other enterprizes than that of the cultivation of cinchona. It is not by evolving theories out of our inner consciousness, but by patient observation of facts, and following out deductions from these to their legitimate results, that the cultivation of calisaya can be advanced. In this way Mr. Moens has the credit of in¬ troducing several improvements, which it would prolong this paper to too great a length to describe. I would simply mention the raising of the seed in porous earthen¬ ware pans, the subsequent care requisite to be extended over the young plants, the grafting of the Ledgeriana on stocks of succirubra, and the mode of harvesting the bark by scraping. On this latter point I will remark that it is not in the calisaya that we find the striking prepon¬ derance of quinine in the outer bark, which I believe I was the first to demonstrate in the face of many author¬ ities to the contrary. In the scrapings of the calisaya, so far as appears at present, there is not a greater abundance of alkaloid than in the bulk of the bark. The reason for this is in the difference of microscopical structure between one variety of cinchona and another. I have shown how remarkably this is changed in the renewal of bark of succirubra. The “laxj cellular tissue ” thus formed is full of alkaloid throughout its whole extent. The whole nature of the bark is thus changed. (To be continued.) Uarliamentarg anlr Poisoning by a Liniment. An accident has occurred at Broughty Ferry, which resulted in the death of Mr. James C. Lindsay, agent for the Royal Bank, he having been accidentally poisoned. On Monday evening, September 6, Mr. Lindsay after taking supper went to bed. He was then quite well, and in his usual good spirits. About an hour afterwards, being troubled with a cough, he rose and went to a press to take a little paregoric, which he usually kept in case of emergency. He picked up a phial, and, after swallow¬ ing a teaspoonful of its contents, returned to bed. The taste appeared to him to be more unpleasant than usual, but he took no more thought about the matter until shortly afterwards he felt a sinking sensation passing over him. Becoming alarmed, he called his daughter, and on informing her of his condition and what he had * I have the hybrid , called pubescens, alluded to by this writer, growing near, with longer and larger pubescent leaves; but I doubt all hybrids as to permanent good qualities. t Ceylon Observer, June 19th, 1880. X See my ‘ Quinology, of the East Indian Plantations.’ September 18, 1SS0.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 247 done, she made an examination of the phial which Mr. Lindsay had used. It was found that instead of taking the paregoric phial, he had taken another bearing the label ‘‘Ess. Bouquet,” but filled with a poisonous liniment for external use. Feeling himself becoming greatly worse, Mr. Lindsay and his daughter went off about midnight to the house of Dr. Wemyss, about half a mile off. When he was admitted by the doctor, Mr. Lindsay felt exhausted and very giddy, and stated that his hands and feet felt very dead. Dr. Wemyss at once gave emetics, and did everything he could to arrest the consequences of the poisoning. His efforts, however, were entirely fruitless, for Mr. Lindsay died in the doctor’s house about half-past two o’clock. — Edinburgh Courant. Hispeitshtg IJTentcrraittra. In order to assist as much as possible our younger brethren, for whose sake partly this column was established, considerable latitude is allowed, according to promise, in the propounding of supposed difficulties. But the right will be exercised of excluding too trivial questions, or re¬ petitions of those that have been previously discussed in principle. And we would suggest that those who meet with difficulties should before sending them search previous numbers of the Journal to see if they can obtain the re¬ quired information. [447]. Can any one inform me what change takes place when the following hypodermic injection deposits, and also how to prevent it ? The | ounce supplied to the surgeon in a stopper bottle from which the syringe is filled deposits enough to block up the needle in three or four days, but the stock solution remains clear for two weeks : — Injectio Morphias et Atropias. R Morphias Acetatis . gr. 24. Atropiae Sulphatis . gr. 1 a. Aquae Destillatae . ^j. R. S. T. [448]. Will any reader of the Pharmaceutical Jouimal kindly inform me the best way of dispensing the follow¬ ing ?— R Ext. Haematoxyli, Cretae Prasp . ail Tinct. Opii . f^j. - Aq. Cinnam . ad f^viij. M. Ft. mist. J UNIOR. [449] . _ R Liq. Hypophosph. Co . t^j. „ Ferri Hypophosph . ^ss. „ Strychniae . 3j. Aquam . ad 5viij. M. I had this prescription the other day, but could not find either the liq. hypophosph. co. or the liq. ferri hypo¬ phosph. in any of the pharmacopoeias. R. E. H [450] . The following appeared in the British Medical Journal, July 24, from one of our authorities on skin diseases, and was stated by him to be the “best” prepara¬ tion for general loss of hair from ordinary circumstances: — Vaseline and Castor Oil . . equal parts. Red Oxide of Mercury ... 5 grains. Strong Liquid Ammonia . . J drachm. And a few drops of Oil of Rosemary. At the request of a medical man I prepared the above, using \ ounce of each vaseline and castor oil (no quantity being mentioned), but no matter in what manner they were mixed they would not combine and finally resolved themselves into their component parts, the mercury at the bottom and the vaseline as a cream on the top. As there are now so many varieties of vaseline, perhaps this may account for the difficulty. Perhaps some pharma¬ cist will volunteer his assistance, for as it stands now nothing could be more inelegant. W. K. G. ttcrt.es miir (Queries. [676]. PREVENTIVE FOR SEA-SICKNESS. Ext. Cannabis Ind . grs. ij. Chloroformi Pur . 3j* For adults, five drops on a lump of sugar on embarking, and repeated in two or three hours if required. For children, one or two drops. In reply to your correspondent, Mr. J. J. Matthias, I send the above, which I have found very useful in cases of sea-sickness. W. Lee. Castle, Northwich. [677]. MARKING INK. — I made some marking ink according to the form given by Mr. R. Roberts in the Journal of December 13, 1879, and obtained a greenish looking ink, the free acid in which destroyed the fabric . On neutralizing with carbonate of potash I got an ink which could not be removed with chloride of lime or caustic potash solution, but it was not at all a good black. Any reader giving information will oblige. W. Miller. [677]. MARKING INK. — I prepared a marking ink from a recipe published in your Journal, viz., manganese phosph., 1 oz., acid hydrochlor., 2 ozs., anthracene, \ oz., water, \ oz., potassa chromate, | oz.; add gum water and shake. I found on mixing the above they form a thick syrupy liquid, not in any way suitable for marking linen. I added more water, but still the result is very unsatis¬ factory. Can you or any of your readers help me ? The receipe was signed “ R. Roberts.” Anteros. €vrasjpxmimt«. *»* No notice can be taken of anonymous communica¬ tions. Whatever is intended for insertion must be authentic catid by the name and address of the writer; not necessarily for publication , but as a guarantee of good faith. Professor Attfield and the Foundation of the British Pharmaceutical Conference. Sir, — Professor Redwood’s volume, ‘ The Progress of Pharmacy ’ (Ed. 1880), has just came under our notice. The record of the establishment of the British Pharmaceu¬ tical Conference, as given at p. 316, is strangely wanting in one essential particular, viz., the part taken by Professor Attfield in that work. It is not unreasonable to regard all who took part in convening or attending the meeting held at Newcastle-upon- Tyne, on September 2, 1863, as founders of the Conference; but if the question of pedigree be pushed back a stage further we must state thus publicly (what we believe to be widely known already) that Professor Attfield was associated with us in the issue of the earliest circular on the subject, and we now add that each of us recognized Professor Attfield’s adoption of the scheme as its one crucial point. We were convinced that if Professor Attfield took up the respon¬ sibilities of the office of Senior Honorary Secretary, the new organization would have secured the needful pivot which would be reliable for its movements in every direc¬ tion. The testimonial just presented to Professor Attfield 248 THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. [September 18, 1880. marks the sense of his fellow members of the fidelity, energy and ability with which his self-imposed duties have been performed during the long period of seventeen years. Richard Reynolds. Henry B. Brady. The Future of Pharmacy. Sir, — If I mistake not, Mr. Chapman, in his able and sensible letter, invited the expression of the opinion or experience of his brethren in business on the question of reduction of prices, and although occupying perhaps only a humble position in the trade, I have ventured a few remarks on the subject. Being in the heart of the South Yorkshire coal district our circumstances and class of business differ very widely from those of Notting Hill, nevertheless the evil of which your correspondent complains affects us even here, to no small extent. Surrounded as we are by the large towns of Sheffield, Rotherham, Barnsley and Doncaster to which places the railway fare varies but from 4 \d. to 9d., and where Is. 1 $d. patents, etc., are sold at prices varying from 9 Id. to lO^d. by generous grocers and “cutting,” or, perhaps as they themselves would put it, “enterprising” druggists, we in this neighbourhood of course experience a considerable diminution in the sale of the various nos¬ trums which formerly constituted an important item in our business. When I state that out of my account with the principal wholesale drug firm with whom I deal, above one-third of the amount was for “patents” it will be seen that they alone constituted no inconsiderable portion of our returns. I ought perhaps to say, that within a radius of from two to three miles, which includes several populous villages, we number about eight registered chemists. Notwithstanding the competition to which we are ex¬ posed from the towns I have named we have none of us as yet made any reduction in our prices. Speaking for myself, however, I frankly confess that my sales of patents have fallen off above one-third, but yet I am in a considerably better position than if I had reduced Is. l^d. articles even to 10$d. For example, on Saturday last I sold eight Is. l%d. patents, on which the profit amounted to 3s., but had I reduced them to, say, 10 Id. I should have had to sell no fewer than two dozen, and at 9gd. of course the sale would require to be increased to three dozen, in the day, ere the same amount of profit could have been obtained. But is it reasonable to suppose that because pills are sold at, say, Id. per box profit, that any person in his senses would think of taking a single pill more than he required, on this account? How often, I would ask, do druggists themselves patronize the contents of their own shop bottles, notwithstanding the fact that they may, if they be so dis¬ posed, revel in the luxury of drugs at cost price ? Why the very supposition is fraught with absurdity ! The difficulty in nine cases out of ten is to induce people to take even the necessary medicine they occasionally require, everybody, so far as my observation goes, being only too glad to echo Macbeth’s cry, “Throw physic to the dogs, I’ll none of it.” Indeed the fact that people cannot be persuaded to swallow drugs if they do not require them is so self-evident that one almost feels ashamed at having to employ any argu¬ ments to prove the truth of the statement. And yet how many are there among our brethren in the trade who have imbibed the erroneous idea that by reducing prices they can increase consumption and so augment their returns, fondly imagining that this in turn necessarily leads to augmented profits. As an example of this very common mistake I may in¬ stance the case of a young gentleman of my acquaintance at present managing (?) a drug business in this county, who, seized with the prevailing mania, thought by a coup de main to increase his employer’s returns by offering customers three boxes of a 7 \d. “patent” for Is. 6d. On a friend pointing out to him that out of the eighteenpence thus ob¬ tained for three, he only reaped the same profit as he would have done had he sold one at its legitimate price of 7i