TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY Natural Science Research Laboratory Special Publications Museum of Texas Tech University Number 56 18 September 2009 Phyllostomid Bats of Colombia: Annotated Checklist, Distribution, and Biogeography Hugo Mantilla-Meluk, Alex Mauricio Jimenez-Ortega, and Robert J. Baker F ront cover: Map of Colombian phyllostomid species richness obtained by the superimposition of models of potential distribution for the 118 species confirmed for Colombia. Warm colors represent high levels of species richness; cool colors represent low levels of species richness. As shown on the map, 80% of the Colombian territory holds suitable environments for phyllostomids which are able to potentially recruit over 30 species in a single location, Of particular interest is the northern portion of the Colombian Amazon, which represents one-fourth of the area of the country and is characterized by a high diversity of phyllostomid bats. Our model of phyllostomid richness indicates that the northern portion of the Colombian Amazon holds areas where up to 57 phyllostomid species potentially can be found in sympatry. Conversely, the highlands of the Colombian Andean system, the savannas of the Colombian Orinoquia, on the eastern portion of the country, and the arid environments of La Guajira peninsula, in the northernmost portion of the Colombian Caribbean region, potentially enclose the less suitable environments for phyllostomid species and represent natural barriers for their distributions. Special Publications Museum of Texas Tech University Number 56 Phyllostomid Bats of Colombia: Annotated Checklist, Distribution, and Biogeography Hugo Mantilla-Meluk, AlexMauricio Jimenez-Ortega, and Robert J. Baker Texas Tech University and Universidad Tecnologica del Choco Diego Luis Cordoba Layout and Design: Lisa Bradley Cover Design: Hugo Mantilla-Meluk Copyright 2009, Museum of Texas Tech University All rights reserved. No portion of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means, including electronic storage and retrieval systems, except by explicit, prior written permission of the publisher. This book was set in Times New Roman and printed on acid-free paper that meets the guidelines for permanence and durability of the Committee on Production Guidelines for Book Longevity of the Council on Library Resources. Printed: 18 September 2009 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Special Publications of the Museum of Texas Tech University, Number 56 Series Editor: Robert J. Baker Phyllostomid Bats of Colombia: Annotated Checklist, Distribution, and Biogeography Hugo Mantilla-Meluk, Alex Mauricio Jimenez-Ortega, and Robert J. Baker ISSN 0169-0237 ISBN 1-929330-18-9 ISBN 13 978-1-929330-18-8 Museum of Texas Tech University Lubbock, TX 79409-3191 USA (806)742-2442 Phyllostomid Bats of Colombia: Annotated Checklist, Distribution, and Biogeography Hugo Mantilla-Meluk, Alex Mauricio Jimenez-Ortega, and Robert J. Baker Abstract We report 118 confirmed phyllostomid species for Colombia, and 14 species po¬ tentially present in the country, for a total of 132 species representing 40 genera and 10 subfamilies. All known phyllostomid subfamilies are represented in Colombia, with the exception of the subfamily Macrotinae (not present in South America). At 118 known species, Colombia has the greatest number of phyllostomid bats of any country. Included in the lists are 27 recently recognized species (19 newly described species and eight newly elevated species ), 19 of which are confirmed for Colombia, while eight are potentially present. The checklist is accompanied by 18 taxonomic comments explain¬ ing recent changes in the taxonomy of the group. In addition. Geographic Information Systems (GlS)-based models of potential distribution were created for both confirmed and potentially present phyllostomid species, and species richness patterns were ana¬ lyzed. Finally, comments on the biogeography of the group are included. Key words: bats, biogeography, checklist, Chiropterans, Colombia, distribution models, Phyllostomidae, taxonomy Resumen Reportamos 118 especies de murcielagos filostomidos para Colombia y 14 espe- cies potencialmente presentes en el pais, para un total de 132 especies que representan 40 generos y 10 subfamilias. Todas las subfamilias de murcielagos filostomidos estan presentes en Colombia con excepcion de de la subfamilia Macrotinae (ausente en Sur America). Con 118 especies reconocidas, Colombia es el pais que posee el mayor numero de murcielagos filostomidos. Nuestro listado incluye 27 especies reconocidas recientemente (19 recientemente descritas y ocho recientemente elevadas), 19 de las cuales estan confirmadas para Colombia mientras ocho corresponden a especies po¬ tencialmente presentes en el pais. Nuestra lista esta acompanada por 18 comentarios que explican los cambios recientes en la taxonomia del grupo. Adicionalmente, mod- elos de distribution potencial basados en Sistemas de Informacion Geografica (SIG) fueron generados tanto para las especies de murcielagos filostomidos presentes como potenciales en el pais, al tiempo que sus patrones de diversidad fueron analizados para los murcielagos filostomidos de Colombia. Finalmente los patrones generates de la biogeografia del grupo son comentados. Palabras clave: biogeografia, Colombia, lista anotada, modelos de distribution, murcielagos, Phyllostomidae, Quiropteros, taxonomia 1 2 Special Publications, Museum of Texas Tech University Introduction In recent years, the availability of genetic data for determining phylogenetic relationships, as well as the description of new species and elevation of subspecies to species status, has resulted in substantial revisions at many taxonomic levels of Neotropical mammals. Phyl- lostomid bats are one of the most intensively studied groups of Neotropical mammals and a major source of new species descriptions and higher taxonomic changes to accommodate monophyly. Herein, previous works, such as Mamfferos (Synapsida: Theria) de Colombia (Alberico et al. 2000), Mammal Species of the World (Wilson and Reeder 2005), Mammals of South America (Gardner 2008), and the Global Mammal Assessment (IUCN 2008), were used to generate a checklist of phyl- lostomid bats from Colombia. This checklist includes recently described taxa and newly elevated species, as well as those species that might be expected to occur in Colombia. The systematic classification of Baker et al. (2003) is followed. This systematic arrangement is based on statistically supported monophyly which was not achieved in previous classifications of this complex of bats (Baker et al. 1989; Koopman 1993; Wetterer et al. 2000). To facilitate comparison of our checklist to that of Alberico et al. (2000) (the most comprehensive checklist of Colombian mammals available to date), we follow their format. Differences between Alberico et al. (2000) and the current check¬ list are highlighted within the list by symbols, which are explained in more detail in the text. The checklist also includes references. Models of potential distribu¬ tion for each Colombian phyllostomid species also are provided; these maps were generated based on marginal localities derived from collecting localities of museum voucher specimens from major mammal collections in Colombia and the United States. The dis¬ tribution maps were then used to investigate affinities in species composition among Colombian ecoregions as outlined by Hemandez-Camacho et al. (1992). In addition, distribution models were used to determine phyllostomid richness distribution in Colombia and the relationship between environmental variables and patterns of species richness. Finally, we discuss the origin of the geographic partitioning observed among Colombian phyllostomid bats. Methods Data gathering. —An intensive search for Co¬ lombian phyllostomid bat records was conducted us¬ ing three primary' sources: digital museum databases, records reported in the scientific literature, and direct inspection of museum voucher specimens in Colom¬ bian and American institutions. This search resulted in 19,952 records obtained from museum databases and literature records, as follows: American Museum of Natural History (AMNH) (N = 950); British Museum of Natural History (BM) (three Colombian records reported in the literature); Instituto Alexander von Humboldt (lAvH) (N = 91); Instituto de Ciencias Natu- rales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia (ICN) (N = 9,477); Field Museum of Natural History (FMNH) (N = 1,556); Museo de Historia Natural Universidad del Cauca. (MNHUC) (N = 543); Museo de Historia Natu¬ ral Universidad de los Andes (MNHU) (six selected records reported in the literature); Museo de Historia Natural Universidad Distrital de Bogota "‘Francisco Jose de Caldas” (MUD) (N = 330); Museo de Histo¬ ria Natural de la Universidad Tecnologica del Choco (MZCH) (N = 600); National Museum Smithsonian In¬ stitution (USNM) (N = 5,980); Royal Ontario Museum (ROM) (52); Texas Tech University Museum (TTU) (N = 259); Universidad del Valle (UV) (N = 105). In addition, a selected subset of phyllostomid records was taxonomically examined by direct inspection of museum voucher specimens as follows: ICN (N = 788); FMNH (N = 220); TTU (N = 75); USNM (N = 193). The complete list of specimens is in the supplementary material section available online at the webpage of the Natural Science Research Laboratory, Museum of Texas Tech University (www.nsrl.ttu.edu). Distribution models. —Models of potential distri¬ bution were created for each phyllostomid bat species present in Colombia. These models were generated using as data points the marginal localities in Gardner (2008) as well as 17,778 records of Colombian phyl¬ lostomid species we were able to georeference based Mantilla-Meluk et al.—Phyllostomid Bats of Colombia 3 on electronic gazetteers available from Falling Rain Genomics, Inc. (www.fallingrain.com) and the National Geospatial Intelligence Agency (http://geonames.nga. mil/ggmaviewer/MainFrameSet.asp). Georeferenced Colombian phyllostomid sam¬ pling localities were converted into point polygon layers in ArcGIS 9.3. Each layer representing species distributional points was then placed over a polygon layer of Neotropical ecoregions obtained from the web¬ site of the World Wildlife Fund (http//: www.wwf.org). Ecoregions intercepting species distributional records were selected using the Select by location option of ArcGIS 9.3 and exported as vector files. The exported files representing selected ecoregions were set as masks in the Spatial Analyst extension of ArcGIS 9.3. Raster layers representing minimum and maximum species elevational limits were then created for each species based on elevational ranges reported in the literature. Digital information on elevation for the Neotropics was derived from a Digital Elevation Model (DEM) avail¬ able at the website WorldClim (http://www.worldclim. org/bioclim.htm) (script incorporated into the Spatial Analyst extension of ArcGIS 9.3: [spnameeleva- tional_range] = ([DEM] >= minimum elevational value AND [DEM] <= maximum elevational value). Ob¬ tained raster files were double-delimited by ecoregion and elevational ranges. Final models were classified with cell values of one (1) for species presence and zero (0) for species absence. Cell size of raster files was adjusted to represent 1 km 2 . Patterns of species richness. —A model of phyl¬ lostomid species richness in Colombia was obtained by combining all raster files representing individual species distribution models in the Spatial Analyst ex¬ tension of ArcGIS 9.3. Correlation between richness and environmental variables. —A raster layer representing the Colombian territory was created with a cell size of 0.05 dpi and each cell was converted into points by applying the Conversion tool in the Spatial Analyst extension of ArcGIS 9.3; this resulted in a point layer of 14,560 points. This point grid was placed on a raster layer representing phyllostomid species richness; richness values were then extracted as a point layer in ArcGIS 9.3 using the Extract values to point tool in the Spatial Analyst extension of ArcGIS 9.3. The same procedure was applied to raster layers representing elevation, minimum temperature of the coldest month of the year, and precipitation (climate data from www.diva-gis.org/ climate.htm). Databases associated with the point layers extracted from each environmental variable, as well as the database associated with the richness point layer, were combined into a single database and exported to the statistical package PAST (version 1.90, available at http://folk.uio.no/ohammer/past), and a Spearman correlation was performed among richness and envi¬ ronmental variables. Composition affinity among Colombian natural regions. —A presence-absence matrix was created based on presence of confirmed Colombian phyl¬ lostomid species by natural region(s), A hierarchical cluster analysis was then performed using the statisti¬ cal software PAST (version 1.90). We chose this type of analysis due to its natural interpretation in terms of graph-based clustering. Results and Discussion Simmons (2005) and Gardner (2008) were used as the basic data from which all more recent conclu¬ sions and suggested taxonomic changes were evaluated and incorporated (Table 1). A major departure from Simmons (2005) and Gardner (2008) was the higher taxonomic structure in which genera and species are ordered. This classification divides the family Phyl- lostomidae into 11 subfamilies (Macrotinae, Micronyc- terinae, Desmodontinae, Lonchorhininae, Phyllostomi- nae, Glossophaginae, Lonchophyllinae, Carollinae, Glyphonycterinae, Rhinophytlinae, Stenodermatinae) documented by multiple gene DNA sequence data to be monophyletic clades. This classification differs substantially from the previously proposed subfamilies in Koopman (1993), Simmons (2005), and Gardner (2008). The changes are analogous to those for families of bats of Teeling et al. (2005) and for vespertillionid bats proposed by Hoofer and Van Den Busche (2003). Special Publications, Museum of Texas Tech University Table 1. List of phyllostomid bats from Colombia. Symbols are as follows: additions and changes to Alberico et al. (2000) (+); endemic (•); taxonomic comments and consideration (§). Elevational ranges in meters. Abbreviations of Colombian natural regions: Amazon (amz); Andean (and); Caribbean (car); Orinoquia (ori); and Pacific (pac). Abbreviations of Colombian departments: Amazonas (ama); Antioquia (ant); Arauca (ara); Atlantico (atl); Bolivar (bl) (2); Boyaca (by); Caldas (cl); Caqueta (caq); Casanare (cas); Caiica (can); Cesar (ce); Choco (cho); Cordoba (co); Ciindinamarca (cun); Guainia (gn); Guaviare (gv); Huila (hit); La Guajira (gua); Magdalena (ma); Meta (met); Nariho (na); Norte de Santander (nsn); Pntumayo (pu); Quindio (qui); Risaralda (ri); San Andres (sand); Santander (snt); Sucre (su); Tolima (to); Valle del Cauca (vc); Vaupes (va); Vichada (vi). References of the scientific literature used as sources for records of Colombian phyllostomid bats are included in Appendix III. Taxa Region Departments (records from reviewed literature) Departments (records from museums) Elevational range Reference Collections PHYLLOSTOMIDAE Subfamily Micronycterinae Lampronycteris Sanborn 1949 Lampronycteris brachvotis Dobson 1879 amz and car ant gua va bl to 0-700 Marinkelle & Cadena 1972 IAvH ICN 16955 MHNUUSNM Micronycteris Gray 1866 Micronycteris hirsuta (Peters 1869) amz and car pac caq cau cl cho ma vc 20-1100 Sanborn 1932 AMNH ICN 17236 MHNUC UV Micronycteris megalotis (Gray 1*842) CO ant caq cau cun cl cho ri vc bo cas ce co hu gua ma me qui sand snt vi 25-2400 Dobson 1878 AMNH FMNH IAvH ICN 1597 MHNUC USNHUV Micronycteris microtis Miller, 1898 amz and car ori ant caq cun 15-2100 Simmons 1996 AMNH 99344 Micronycteris minuta (Gervais 1856) CO ant cl cho met ma na vc ama caq cas co cun gua nsn pu snt 5-1130 Koopman 1982 AMNH FMNH IAvH ICN MZCH TTU USNMUV Micronycteris schmidtornm (Sanborn 1935) amz and car pac ant cho snt gua ma 10-160 Koopman 1982 MZCH ICN 14751 Subfamily Dcsmodontinac Tribe Dcsmodontini Desmodus Wied-Neuwied 1826 Desmodus rotundus (E. Geoffroyi St. Hilaire 1810) CO ant caq cau cl cho cun gn na ri snt to vc ama bl bo cas ce hu gua ma me na qui vi 0-2600 J.A. Allen 1900 AMNH FMNH IAvH ICN 466 MHNUC MUD MZCH ROM TTU USNM UV Diaemus Miller 1906 Diaemus youngi (Jentick 1893) CO ant caq cau cho pu vc cas hu me 0-500 de la Torre 1956 IAvH ICN 7580 UV Tribe Diphyllini mvssm= Diphylla ecaudata Spix 1823 CO ant caq cau ma gv me va 0-500 J.A. Allen 1900 AMNH FMNH IAvH ICN 14568 MHNUC USNM Subfamily Lonchorhininae Lonchorhina Tomes 1863 Lone horrh ina aurita Tomes 1863 CO ant caq cau cho met na vc cl co nst ri 25-1550 Niceforo Maria in Sanborn 1949 AMNH FMNH IAvH ICN 14716 MHNUC MZCH USNM UV Lonchorrhina marinkellei Hemandez-Camacho and Cadena 1978 amz caq va 0-500 Hernandez Camacho & Cadena 1978 ICN (holotype) Lonchorrhina orinocensis Linares and Ojasti 1971 amz ori caq met ama va vi 75-620 Linares & Ojasti 1971 IAvH ICN 14671 Mantilla-Meluk et al.—Phyllostomid Bats of Colombia 5 Table 1. (cont.) Taxa Region Departments (records from reviewed literature) Departments (records from museums) Elevational range Reference Collections Subfamily Phylfostominae Tribe Macrophyllini MacrophyUum Gray 1838 MacrophyUum macrophvllum (Schinz 1821) CO ant cho ma vc bl gua snt to va 10-1070 J.A. Allen 1900 lAvH ICN 18773 MUD UV Trachops Gray 1847 Trachops cirrhosiis (Spix 1823) CO ant caq cau ma vc ama ara bl bo ce gua met pu nsn snt to va vi 10-1120 Dobson 1878 AMNHFMNHIAvH ICN 544 MHNUC MZCH TTUUSNM UV Tribe Phyllostomini Lophostoma d'Orbygni 1836 + § (1} Lophostoma brasiliense Peters 1866 + amz car ori pac ant cho gn met vc caq cun hu gua met pu va 10-1100 Lemke et al. 1982 FMNH ICN 17932 USNMUV Lophostoma carrikeri (J. A. Allen 1910) + amz ori caq met 45-700 McCarty et al. 1983 ICN 5140 FMNH Lophostoma sihicohm d'Orbygni 1836 + CO ant caq cau cl cho gn ma vc gua me pu to va 10-850 J.A. Allen 1900 AMNH IAvH ICN 17877 MZCH USNM UV Minion Gray 1847 Minion bennettii (Gray 1838) § (2) amz ori cq gn me 0-500 Montenegro and Romero- Ruiz 2000 FMNH 113425 ICN USNM Minton cozumelae Goldman 1914 § (2) + car pac ant cho CO 0-500 Marinkelle & Cadena 1972 FMNH 69427 USNM 43175 Minion crenuiatnm (E, Geoffroyi St. Hilaire 1803) CO ant caq cau cl cho vc co gn gua ma me va vi 5-830 Handley 1960 IAvH ICN 10231 MHNUC MZCH TTU UV PhylIoderma Peters 1865 Phylloderma stenops Peters 1865 CO ama ant caq cho gn met vc gn pu 0-1100 Marinkelle & Cadena 1972 IAvH ICN 4465 TTU UV Phyttostomus Lacepede 1799 Phyllostomus discolor (Wagner 1843) CO ant caq cau cl cho cun gn met ri to vc bl bo cas hu ma nsn su 10-1650 Valdivieso and Tamsitt AMNH FMNH IAvH ICN 458 MZCH USNHUV Phyllostomus elogatus (E. Geoffroyi St. Hilaire 1810) amz caq cau gn pu cas co met va 10-850 Furman 1966 FMNH IAvH ICN 8320 MUD TTU USNM Phyllostomus hastatus (Pallas 1767) CO ant bo caq cau cl cho cun gn na to vc ama bl cas ce hu gua met snt su vi 0-1295 J.A. Allen 1900 AMNH FMNH IAvH ICN 639 MHNUC MUD MZCH ROM TTU USNM UV Phyllostomus latifolius (Thomas 1901) amz pac caq cau va vc 0-500 Marinkelle & Cadena 1972 ICN 14603 MHNUC MNHUMZCHUV Tonatia Gray 1827 Tonatia saurophila Koopman and Williams 1951 amz and ori pac ant caq cau met hu ga pu va 10-140 Sanchez- Palomino et. al 1993 FMNH ICN 10254 UV Tribe Vampirini wssmmmsEm Chrotopterus auritus (Peters 1865) CO ant caq cau cho me ma gn gua 0-850 J.A. Allen 1900 AMNH IAvH ICN 14566 Vampyrum Refinesque 1815 Vampyrum spectrum (Linnaeus 1758) CO ant caq cau cl cho na vc ama cu met vi 10-1065 Hall & Kelson 1959 IAvH ICN 176 USNM 6 Special Publications, Museum of Texas Tech University Table 1. (cont.) Taxa Region Departments (records from reviewed literature) Departments (records from museums) Elevational range Reference Collections Subfamily Glossophaginae Tribe Choeronycterini An our a Gray 1838 Anoura aequatoris (Lonnberg 1921)+ and ant cau cl na ri hu to vc 1000-3000 Mantilla-Meluk and Baker 2006 FMNHICN 7615 MHNUC Anoura cadenai Mantilla- Meluk and Baker 2006 • andpac cau vc 1000-1500 Mantilla-Meluk and Baker 2006 ICN holotype NMNH Anoura caudifer (E. Geoffroyi St. Hilaire 1818) amzand car ori ant cau caq ce cl cho ma na ri snt to va vc cas cun hu gua met pu to va vi 500-2800 Mantilla-Meluk and Baker 2006 AMNH FMNH IAvH ICN 13833 MHNUC MUD ROM TTU USNM UV Anoura cultrata Handley 1960 m ant caq cau cl cho nsn snt vc cun met na nsn 0-1800 Lemke and Tamsitt 1979 FMNH IAvH ICN 7616 MHNUC UV Anoura fistulata Muchhala, Mena, and Albuja 2005 + and na cau ri 1000-1800 Mantilla-Meluk and Baker 2008 FMNH 113512 ICN Anoura geoffroyi Gray 1838 CO ant caq cau cl cho cun ri snt vc cun gn met na to va 500-3600 J.A. Allen 1916 AMNH FMNH IAvH ICN 843 MHNUC MUD ROM USNM UV Anoura latidens Handley 1984 and cau 1000-1500 Handley 1984 MHNUC 1552 Anoura luismanueli Molinari 1994 + and cun snt 1000-1500 Mantilla-Meluk and Baker 2006 ICN 6602 MUD Choeroniscus Thomas 1928 Choeroniscus godmani (Thomas 1903) and car ant cau cl na met vc cun 0-1600 Tamsitt et al. 1965 ICN 8064 MHNUC UV Choeroniscus minor (Peters 1868) § (3) amz and cau caq cho cun gnto pu va 0-1032 Valdivieso 1964 ICN 9775 MHNUC TTUUV Choeroniscus periosus Handley 1966 pac cau cho vc na 0-500 Handley 1966 AMNH ICN MZCH NMNS (holotype)UV Lichonycteris Thomas 1895 Lichonycteris degener Miller 1931 + amz caq gv 0-500 Montenegro and Romero- Ruiz 2000 ICN 14571 Lichonycteris obscura Thomas 1895 § (4) amz pac ant caq cl cho vc co ma na to 0-500 Marinkelle & Cadena 1972 FMNH IAvH ICN MZCH USNM UV Scleronycteris Thomas 1912 Scleronycteris ega Thomas 1912 §(5) amz va 0-500 Alberico et al. 2000 IAvH? Tribe Glossophagini Glossophaga E. Geoffroyi St Hilaire 1818 Glossophaga commissarisi Gardner 1962 amzand ama ant cho bl caq ce gn ma met su vi 0-1000 Webster and Jones 1987 IAvH ICN MUD MZCH TTU 9093 UV Glossophaga longirostris Miller 1898 and car ant cl cun ma atl bl bo ce gua su vi 5-1050 Miller 1898 AMNH FMNH IAvH ICN 5361 MUD USNM UV Glossophaga soricina (Pallas 1766) CO ant cau caq cl cho ma met gn to vc ara caq cas cun gn vi 0-1560 J.A. Allen 1900 AMNH FMNH IAvH ICN 1749 MHNUC MZCH ROM TTUUV Leptonycteris Lydekker 1891 Leptonycteris curasoae Miller 1900 and car bl snt bo gua ma 0-900 Marinkelle and Grose 1966 FMNH MHNU ICN 2521 USNM Mantilla-Meluk et al.—Phyllostomid Bats of Colombia 7 Table 1. (cont.) Taxa Region Departments (records from reviewed literature) Departments (records from museums) Elevational range Reference Collections Subfamily Lonchophyllinae Lionycteris Thomas 1913 Lionycteris spurrelli Thomas 1913 amzand car pac ant caq cau cho cun na me vc gn cas gn va 90-1400 Thomas 1913 BM holotype IAvH ICN MZCH USNM uv Lonchophylla Thomas 1903 Lonchophylla cadenai Woodman and Timm 2006 +-• and pac ri vc 0-1500 Woodman and Timm 2006 ICN USNM holotype Lonchophylla chocoana Davalos 2004 + pac vc 500-1000 Davalos 2004 ICN ROM holotype MZCH USNM LanchoptyUn conccrva Goldman 1914 + $ (6) and car pac cau cho na qui snt vc 0-1000 Albuja and Gardner 2005 FMNH ICN 7009 MHNUC USNM Lonchophylla fornicata (Woodman 2007) pac cau 500- 1560 Woodman 2007 ICN 13647 MHNUC Lonchopfn/la handleyf Hill 1980+ § (7) and ant cau cho hu nar vc 500-1000 Alberico and Orejuela 1983 MHNUC 718 UV Lonchophylla orienticollina Davalos and Cohortals 2009 + • § (8) and ori met 0-1500 Davalos & Corthals 2009 ICN holotype Lonchophylla robusta Miller 1912 and car pac ant cl cho cun na snt vc bo ce gua ma nsn to 0-1900 Sanborn 1949 AMNH FMNH IAvH ICN 4397 MHNUC MZCH USNM UV Lonchophylla thomasi J. A. Allen 1904 CO ant caq vc ama bo gua met pu ri va vi 0-1000 Koopman 1982 FMNH IAvH ICN 9479 MZCH TTU USNM UV Subfamily Carollinae CarolliaG ray 1838 § (9) Carollia brevicauda (Schinz 1821) CO ant cau caq cl cho gn met na ri snt to vc ama ara bo cas ce cun gn gua hu ma me nsn qui to va vi 500-2000 Bangs 1900 AMNH FMNH IAvH ICN 5228 MHNUC MUD MZCH ROM TTU USNM UV Carollia castanea H. Allen 1890 CO ant caq cau cl cho gn nsn ri vc ama bo cas co cu ma me pu snt to 0-1500 Hershkovitz 1949 AMNH FMNH IAvH ICN 7049 MHNUC MUD MZCH TTU USNM UV Carollia monohernandezi Cuartas and Gonzalez 2004 + • and car pac ant bl caq cho 30-2660 Munoz, Cuartas and Gonzalez 2004 MUA holotype MZCH Carollia perspicillata (Linnaeus 1758) CO ant caq cau cl cho cun gn ma met ri snt to vc ama ara atl bl bo cas ce co gn gua gv na nsn pu su va vi 0-2000 Dobson 1878 AMNH FMNH IAvH ICN 555 MUD MZCH ROM TTU USNMH UV Subfamily Rhonophyllinae Rhinophylla Peters 1865 Rhinophylla alethina Handley 1966 pac ant cau vc cho 0-1000 Handley 1966 AMNH FMNH ICN MHNUC MZCH NMNM (holotype) UV Rhinophylla fischerae D. C. Carter 1966 amz ama caq cau gn met pu 0-500 Marinkelle & Cadena 1972 FMNH IAvH ICN 5161 TTU Rhinophylla pumilio Peters 1865 amz ori ama caq cau gn met pu vi gn va 0-500 Barriga-Bonilla 1965 MHNU IAvH ICN 671 TTU UV Special Publications, Museum of Texas Tech University Table 1. (cont.) Taxa Region Departments (records from reviewed literature) Departments (records from museums) Elevational range Reference Collections Subfamily Glyphonycterinae Glvphonycteris Thomas 1896 § (10) Glvphonycteris sylvestris (Thomas 1896) ' amzcar ant caq CO 15-1100 Montengro and Romero-Ruiz 2000 ICN 172392 wmmmmmm Neonycteris pusilla (Sanborn 1949) + §(11) amz va 0-500 Sanborn 1949 AMNH 78830 Brazil-Colombia Trinycteris Sanborn 1949 Trinycteris nicefori Sanborn 1949 amz and pac caq cho nsn to VC ama gn met 15-150 Sanborn 1949 AMNH holotype ICN MZCHUV Subfamily Stenodermatiuae Tribe Sturuirini Sturnira Gray 1842 Sturnira aratathomasi Peterson and Tamsitt 1968 and ant cau cl ri vc 1600-2800 Peterson & Tamsitt 1968 IAvh UV ROM (holotype) USNM Sturnira hidens (Thomas 1915) and ant cau cl cho na ri to bo hu met qui vc 1800-3100 Marinkelle & Cadena 1972 IAvH ICN 1700 ROM MHN1J MHNUC UV Sturnira bogotensis Shamel 1927 and ant na to cun met ris 1500-3100 Shamel 1927 IAvH ICN MUD USNM holotype Sturnira eryihromus Tschudi 1844 and ant cau cl nar ri sntto bo cas ce cun ma met nsn qui to vc 1800-3500 Lemke et al. 1982 FMNH IAvH ICN 5365 MHNUC TTU USNM UV Sturnira koopmanhilli McCarthy and Albuja 2006 + §(12) and pac ant cau cho na 1000-1500 McCarty, Albuja, and Alberico 2006 MHNUC MZCHUV 4442 Sturnira lilium (E. Geoffroyi St. Hilaire 1810) CO ant cau cho cun gn ma na ri snt to VC ama bl bo cl cas gn gua hu met nsn pu su va 0-1900 Hershkovitz 1949 IAvH ICN 683 MHNUC MUD MZCH TTU UV Sturnira luisi Davis 1980 and pac ant cau cho to VC atl ce met snt 0-500 Alberico & Negret 1992 FMNH ICN MHNUC MZCH USNM 499420UV Sturnira magna de la Torre 1966 amz ama cau gua met pu gv 0-500 Marinkelle & Cadena 1972 FMNH ICN 6880 MHNUUV Sturnira mistratensis Contreras-Vega and Caden, 2000 + * and ri 980 Contreras and Cadena 2000 ICN holotype Sturnira oporaphilum Tschudi 1844 §(13) and pac ant cau cl cun na ri snt to vc bo ce hu met nsn pu vc Valdivieso 1964 AMNH FMNH ICN MHNUC MUD TTU USNM 483510 UV Sturnira tildae de la Torre 1959 amz and ori ama ant gn met pu to bo caq cun gn ri va vi 0-500 Marinkelle & Cadena 1972 IAvH ICN 5206 MUD TTU UV Tribe Stenodermatini Subtribe \ ampyrissina Chiroderma Peters 1860 Chirodertna salvini Dobson 1878 and pac ant caq cau cl cho na snt to ce met pu ri vc 0-2000 Dobson 1880 FMNH IAvH ICN 6193 MHNUC MZCH USNM UV Chiroderma trinitatum Goodwin 1958 amz car pac ant caq cau cho gn ama bo ce ma snt va vc vi 0-500 Barriga-Bonilla 1965 FMNH IAvH ICN 18852 MZCH TTU USNM UV Chiroderma villosum Peters I860 amz car pac ant caq cau cho ma na vc ama ara met pu va 0-500 Allen 1900 AMNH FMNH IAvH ICN 2188 USNM UV Mantilla-Meluk et al.—Phyllostomid Bats of Colombia 9 Table 1. (cont.) Taxa Region Departments (records from reviewed literature) Departments (records from museums) Elevational range Reference Collections Platyrrhinus Saussure I860 Platyrrhinus aJbericoi Velazco 2005+ and ori met ant bo cun ma nsn qui ri snt vc 1000- 1800 Velazco 2005 IAvH ICN 8151 MUA USNM Platyrrhinus aquihis (Handley and Ferris 1972) + car 0-500 Velazco in press Platyrrhinus brachycephalus (Rouk and Carter 1972) amz ama ara caq met bo cas cl co cun hu pu ri va 0-500 Rouk and Carter 1972 FMNH IAvH ICN 121261 MZCHTTU USNM UV Platyrrhinus chocoensis Alberico and Velasco 1991 pac cau cho nave 0-1000 Alberico & Velasco 1991 FMNH ICN IAvH MHNUC MZCH USNM UV holotype Platyrrhinus dorsalis (Thomas 1900) CO ant caq cau cl cho cu na ri to VC bo cau cun hu met qui 1000-1300 Dobson 1878 FMNH IAvH ICN 656 KU MHNUC MUA MZCH TTUUV Platyrrhinus heiieri (Peters 1866) CO ant caq cau cho cun gn met to bo cl co hu ma na nsn pu qui ri snt vc va vi 0-1500 Sanborn 1955 FMNH IAvH ICN 13027 MZCH MHNUC MUA TTU USNM UV Platyrrhinus incarum (Thomas 1912) + amz ama 0-500 Velazco (in press) USNM 483642 Platyrrhinus infuscus (Peters 1880) ' amz caq cau met pu ama pu 0-1000 Marinkelle 1970 FMNH IAvH ICN MHNU TTU USNM UV Platyrrhinus ismaeli Velazco 2005 + and hu ant bo caq cun met nsn pu qui ri vc 1000-1500 Velazco 2005 FMNH 58733 IAvH ICN MUA USNM UV Platyrrhinus nigellus (Gardner and Carter 1972) + and car ce na bo caq cau cun hu ma met na nsn pu qui ri snt vc 620-2757 Velazco 2005 FMNH 6948 IAvH ICN USNM Platyrrhinus umbratiis (Lyon 1902) + and car ant ma to bo ce cho cun hu ma ri snt vc 400-2550 Velazco (in press) MUD holotype Platyrrhinus vittatus (Peters 1859) CO ant cau cl cun ma na ri to ma met nave 1000-3000 Allen 1900 AMNH 1500 IAvH ICN MHNUC MUD TTU UV Platyrrhinus sp. nov. Velazco and Gardner (in press) pac o tr o <: o Velazco and Gardner (in press) Uroderma Peters 1866 Uroderma bilobatum Peters 1866 CO ant caq cl cho cun gn ma met ama ara bl bo cas ce co cun hu gua ma met pu snt su to va vc 0-1500 Allen 1900 AMNH FMNH IAvH ICN 3993 MUD MZCH TTU USNM UV Uroderma magnirostrum Davis 1968 CO ant caq cho met ama bl caq cas cun gua me nsn to vc 0-500 Davis 1968 AMNH IAvH ICN 12661 MUD TTU USNM UV Vampvressa Thomas 1900 §(I4)T Vampyressa melissa Thomas 1926 § (15) + amz and caq hu na snt vc ama cau met na pu ri snt vc 0-2000 Lemke et al. 1982 Ospina and Gomez 1999 FMNH IAvH 2282 ICN TTU Vampyressa thyone Thomas 1909 CO ant caq cau cho gn ma na ri to vc ama bo cl cun met pu snt va 0-1900 Thomas 1909 AMNH BMNH FMNH ICN MHNROM UC USNM 483735 10 Special Publications, Museum of Texas Tech University Table 1. (cont.) Taxa Region Departments (records from reviewed literature) Departments (records from museums) Elevational range Reference Collections Vampiriscus Thomas 1900§ (14) Vampyriscus bidens (Dobson 1878) + amz and caq cau va met pu 0-1000 Marinkelle & Cadena 1972 IAvH ICN 18646 ROM USNH UV Vampyniscus brocki (Peterson 1968) + amz ama ce ma 0-500 Baker et al. 1972 CSJ ICN 14913 UV IAvH ROM TTU Vampyriscus nymphaea (Thomas 1909) + pac ant cau cho ri vc 0-1900 Thomas 1909 AMNH FMNH ICN 16165 MHNUC MZCH USNMUV Vampyrodes Thomas 1900 Vampyrodes caraccioli (Thomas 1889) CO cau cho gn ant pu vc va 0-1000 Arata et al. 1968 FMNH IAvH ICN 11274 TTU USNM UV Tribe Mesostenodermatini Subtribe Euchistenina Enchistenes Andersen 1906 Enchistenes hartii Thomas 1892 + CO ant caq cau cl cho na ri vc ama bo cas cun met snt pu to 0-2000 Arata et al. 1968 FMNH ICN 6771 MHNUC MZCH TTU USNM Subtribe EctophyIlina§ (16) Mesophylla Thomas 1901 Mesophylla macconnelh Thomas 1901 CO ant caq cau cl cho ri vc gn ama gn met na pu ri va vc vi 0-1500 Laurie 1955 FMNH IAvH ICN MZCH TTU USNM 499483 UV Subtribe Artibeina Artibeus Leach 1821 Artibeus ampins Handley 1987 and car ant caq cau bo ce ma met 0-1300 Handley 1987 IAvH ICN 13344 UV Artibeus concolor Peters 1865 §(17) + ama and sntgn ama caq gn va vi 0-500 Dobson 1880 IAvH ICN 15014 UV Artibeus jamaicensis Leach 1821 car ori pac ant cau cl cho cun ma ri to vc bl bo cl cas ce co cun ma met nsn sand pro 0-2100 J.A. Allen 1890 AMNH FMNH IAvH ICN MHNUC MUD MZCH ROM TTU USNM 499488 UV Artibeus lituratus (Olfers 1818) CO ant cau cl cho cun ma met snt to ama ara bo cas ce co gn gua hu na nsn pu qui ri snt to vc va vi 0-2600 Dobson 1878 AMNH FMNH IAvH ICN 447 MHNUC MUD MZCH TTU USNMUV Artibeus obscurus (Schinz 1821) amz and ant cau met gn ama ara cl caq gn met ri va yi 0-1000 Munoz 1986 FMNH 113407 IAvH ICN TTU USNM UV Artibeus planirostris (Spix 1823) amz and ori caq ama cun hu met nsn pu snt vi 0-1300 Koopman 1982 IAvH ICN 17307 TTU UV Dermanura Gervais 1856 + §(18) Dermanura underseni (Osgood 1916) + amz ama ama ant bl caq ce cho co cun met nsn 0-500 Cuervo et al 1986 ICN 17180 ROM 63061 Dermanura bogotensis (Andersen 1906) + and cun ce ri 2600 Acta chiropterologic a ICN holotype Dermanura glauca (Thomas 1893) + CO caq cau cl cho cun ma met snt ant 0-2100 Dobson 1880 IAvH ICN MHNUC UV Mantilla-Meluk et al.—Phyllostomid Bats of Colombia 11 Table 1. (cont.) Taxa Region Departments (records from reviewed literature) Departments (records from museums) Elevational range Reference Collections Dermamra gnoma (Handley 1987) + amz caq ant 0-600 Munoz-Saba 1999 IAvH icn uv mhn ROM UC 545 Denrtamra phaeoris Miller 1902 + and car pac ant cau cl cho na ri vc ce co ma qui 0-1700 J.A. Allen 1916 FMNH 113998IAvH ICN MHNUC MZCH TTU UV Dermamra rava Miller 1902 + and pac cho 0 -1000 Solari et al. 2008 ICN 8738 Dermamra tolteca (Saussure 1860) + and pac ant cau snt ri 1500-2500 Cuervo et al 1986 ICN 11516 MHNUC Dermamra watsoni (Thomas 1901) + and pac cau cho met ant na vc 0-1000 Solari et al. 2008 AMNH BM ICN MZCH MHNUC 650 ROM TTU Subtribe Stenodermantina Ametrida Gray 1847 A me mi da centurio Gray 1847 amz vi 0-500 Alberico et al. 2000 ICN 13983 SpinieronyeLeris Peters 1882 Sphaeronycteris toxophylhim Peters 1882 amz and car am a cun met snt caq ma va vi 0-2600 Sanborn 1941 IAvH ICN 499 ICN 499 TTU UV Additional genetic data will undoubtedly provide higher resolution and possibly indicate other taxonomic changes, but at this point in time these molecular-based trees are the best supported classifications available and are appropriately used as a starting point to understand the diversity, evolution of morphology and karyotypes, ecological associations, and other aspects of the biology of New World leaf-nosed bats. List summary .— We report 118 confirmed phyl¬ lostomid species for Colombia (Table 1) and 14 species potentially present in the country (Table 2) for a total of 132 species representing 40 genera and 10 subfamilies. All known phyllostomid subfamilies are represented in Colombia, with the exception of the subfamily Mac- rotinae (not present in South America). At 118 known species, Colombia has the greatest number of bat spe¬ cies of phyllostomid bats of any country, surpassing countries of larger geographic area and greater overall mammalian diversity such as Brazil, Mexico, and Peru (Table 3). The number of phyllostomid species reported for Colombia is expected to increase in the near future as a result of intensive field work (e.g., conducted by Colombian museums and scientists), as well as revi¬ sionary systematics of phyllostomid bats. Taxonomic comments. —Eighteen taxonomic comments (designated by § in Table 1) are included: (1) We follow Lee et al. (2002) and identify as members of the genus Lophostoma: L. brasiliense , L. carrikeri, and L. silvicolum , which were included as members of the genus Tonatia by Alberico et al. (2000). (2) We follow Simmons and Voss (1998) and recognize Mimon cozimelae Goldman 1914 as a different taxon from M. bennettii. Alberico et al. (2000) recognized Mimon specimens from Chigorodo, Antioquia, originally reported as M. cozumelae by Marinkelle and Cadena (1972), as M. bennettii. Mimon specimens from Chig¬ orodo reported in Marinkelle and Cadena (1972) were deposited at the USNM collections and the Museum of Natural History of the Universidad de los Andes in Bogota (MHNU), acronym used in Marinkelle and Cadena (1972). Mimon bennettii specimen(s) from the department of Meta, on the eastern versant of the Colombian Andes, reported by Alberico et al. (2000) should correspond to the material supposedly deposited at the AMNH by Marinkelle and Cadena (1972). How¬ ever, after mining the collection database of the AMNH we were not able to find Colombian specimens of M. cozumelae or M. bennettii. (3) We follow Simmons and Voss (1998) and treat Choeroniscus intermedius J.A. 12 Special Publications, Museum of Texas Tech University Table 2. Species potentially present in Colombia. Abbreviations for Colombian regions are the same as those used in Table 1. Abbreviations of countries: Ecuador (ecu); Peru (per); Venezuela (ven). Elevations in meters. Taxa Region Elevational range Reference Country Subfamily Micronycterinae Micronycteris brosseti Simmons and Voss 1998 amz 0-500 Simmons and Voss 1998 per Micronycteris giovanniae Baker and Fonseca 2007 pac 0-500 Fonseca et al. 2007 ecu Micronycteris homezi Pirlot 1967 and ori 0-1500 Pirlot 1967 ven Micronycteris metises Simmons et al. 2002 amz 0-500 Simmons et al. 2002 per Subfamily Lonchorhininae Lonchorhinafernandezi Ochoa and Ibaflez 1982 amz ori 0-500 Ochoa and Ibanez 1982 ven Lonchorhina inusitata Handley and Ochoa 1997 amz ori 0-500 Handley and Ochoa 1997 ven Subfamily Phyllostominae Lophostoma aequatorialis Baker et al. 2004 pac 0.800 Baker et al 2004 ecu Lophostomayasimi (Fonseca and Pinto 2004) amz 0-500 Fonseca and Pinto 2004 ecu Subfamily Lonchophyllinac Lonchophylla orcesi Albuja and Gardner 2005 pac 0-1000 Albuja and Gardner 2005 ecu Lonchophylla pattoni Woodman and Timm 2006 amz 0-500 Woodman and Timm 2006 per Subfamily Glyphonycterinae Glyphonycteris detviesi Hill 1965 amz ori 0-1000 Gardner 2008 bra per ven Subphaniily Stenodermatinae Platyirhimis qurariits Handley and Ferris 1972 amz ori 700-2200 Velazco 2005 ven Platyirhinus matapalensis Velazco 2005 pac 200-1500 Velazco 2005 ecu Dermanura rosenbergi Thomas 1897 pac 0-1000 Hoofer et al. 2008 ecu Table 3. Number of phyllostomid species by country, as reported in the most recently updated literature. Country Number of species Reference Colombia 118 This work Brazil 90 dos Reis et al. (2007) Venezuela 88 Linares (1997) Peru 88 UICN (2009) Ecuador 86 Tirira (2007) Bolivia 72 Aguirre (2008) Costa Rica 63 LaVal and Rodriguez (2002) Mexico 55 Ceballos and Oliva (2005) Paraguay 20 Lopez-Gonzalez (2005) Argentina 17 Barquez et al. (1999) Mantilla-Meluk et al.—Phyllostomid Bats of Colombia 13 Allen and Chapman 1893 as a junior synonym of C. minor. (4) Alberico et al. (2000) made reference to the holotype of Lichonycteris obscura (type locality Ma¬ nagua, Nicaragua) with a Colombian origin. This may be an editorial mistake and the authors may have been referring to the holotype of Lionycteris spnrrelli which is adjacent to L. obscura in their list. The holotype of L. spnrrelli is deposited in the BM (BM-13.8.10.1) and was collected in Condoto, Choco, Colombia (Carter and Dolan 1978). (5) We follow Alberico et al. (2000) and include Scleronycteris ega Thomas 1912 as present in Colombia. However, we failed to find the museum material supposedly deposited at the IAvH support¬ ing the hypothesis by Alberico et al. (2000). Further investigation is necessary to confirm the presence of this taxon in Colombia. (6) Alberico et al. (2000) followed the criteria of Handley (1966) and reported L. mordax for Colombia; Lonchophylla mordax was restricted to southeastern South America by Albuja and Gardner (2005). We follow Albuja and Gardner (2005) and treat Colombian populations of Lonchophylla previously identified as L. mordax as L. concava. (7) Griffiths and Gardner (2008) restricted the distribu¬ tion of L. handleyi to Peru and reassigned L. hand ley i records reported by Alberico and Orejuela (1992) as L. chocoana. We report a record of L. handleyi from Huila deposited at the collections of the MHNUC. (8) Davalos and Corthals (2009) extended the distribution of L. orienticollina on the western side of the Eastern Corddlera of the Colombian Andes. The direct analysis of the morphology of specimen TCN 16238 from the western versant of the Eastern Cordillera, included in the type series of L. orienticollina , revealed that this specimen does not differ from typical L. robusta. Fur¬ ther research is necessary to determine the actual limits of these two taxa in Colombia, (9) We follow McLellan and Koopman (2008) and treat Carollia colombiana Cuartas et al. 2001, with type locality La Cejita road, Barbosa, Antioquia, Colombia, as junior synonym of C. castanea; (10) Although Glyophonycteris daviesi (Hill 1965) was included in Alberico et al. (2000), the authors did not provide information on museum mate¬ rial supporting its presence in Colombia. However, G. daviesi has been documented for Brazil, Ecuador, Peru, and Venezuela from localities adjacent to Colombia and holding environments similar to those typical of the Colombian Amazon and Orinoquia. (11) Alberico et al. (2000) did not provide a catalogue number for Neonycterispusilla (Sanborn 1949) specimens depos¬ ited at the AMNH. Alberico et al. (2000) may refer to specimens AMNH 78830-31 in the type series of the species, from Tahuapunta. Rio Vaupes, at the Colom¬ bian border, Amazonas Brazil, collected by the Olalla brothers on 14 July 1929 (Sanborn 1949). (12) Speci¬ mens reported by Alberico et al. (2000) as Sturnira mordax are treated as S. koopmanhilli following the criteria proposed by McCarthy et al. (2006). (13) We follow Gardner (2008) in considering Sturnira ludovici as a subspecies of S. oporaphilum (S. o. ludovici). Sturnira ludovici was treated as a species by Alberico et al. (2000). (14) We follow Baker et al. (2003) and recognize as members of the genus Vampyriscus : V bide ns, V. brocki , and V. nymphaea , previously included in the genus Vampvressa by Alberico et al. (2000). (15) We follow Lim et al. (2003) and consider Colombian specimens previously identified as V. pusilla as V. thyone. Gardner (2008) confined the distribution of V. pusilla to southern Brazil and Paraguay. (16) Alberico et al. (2000) recognized Ectophylla alba as present in Colombia based on material deposited at the UV with no catalogue number provided in their publication. We could not find specimens of E. alba supposedly depos¬ ited at the UV; hi this work we follow Gardner (2008) who restricted E. alba to Central America. It is likely that Colombian E. alba specimens reported by Alberico et al. (2000) correspond to Mesophylla macconnellii. (17) We follow Hoofer et al. (2008) and recognize Koopania conco/or as Artibeus coneolor. (18) We fol¬ low Hoofer et al. (2008) in considering Dermanura as a distinct genus from Artibeus ; Alberico et al. (2000) considered Dermanura as a subgenus within Artibeus. A large number of Dermanura specimens deposited in Colombian collections (i. e. 236 of the specimens in our database of the 1CN collection) have been misidentified as D. cinerea , an epithet which enclosed D. anderseni, D. cinerea , D. glauca , D. gnorna , and D. watsoni , as mentioned by Gardner (2008). Newly described and elevated species .— We included in our lists 27 newly recognized species (19 newly described species and eight newly elevated spe¬ cies), 19 of which are confirmed for Colombia, while eight are potentially present (*) in the country. The new species are as follows: Micronytteris matses* Simmons et al. 2002 with type locality in Nuevo San Juan, Loreto, Peru; M. brosseti* Simmons and Voss 1998 with type locality in Paracou, French Guiana; M. 14 Special Publications, Museum of Texas Tech University giovanniae* Baker and Fonseca 2007 with type locality in Esmeraldas San Lorenzo (toward Lita), Finca San Jose, Ecuador; Lophostoma aequatoriahs* Baker et al. 2004 with type locality in Estacion Experimental La Chiquita, near San Lorenzo, Esmeraldas, Ecuador; L. yasimi* (Fonseca and Pinto 2004) with type local¬ ity in the vicinity of Yasuni Research Station, Yasuni National Park and Biosphere Reserve, Orellana, Ecua¬ dor; Anoura aequatoris with type locality in lllambo Gualea, Ecuador (Lonnberg 1921) a former subspecies of A. caudifer elevated by Mantilla-Meluk and Baker (2006) and confirmed in Colombia by the same au¬ thors; A. cadenai Mantilla-Meluk and Baker 2006 with type locality in Calima, Valle del Cauca; A. fistulata Muchhala et al. 2005 described from Condor Mirador, Ecuador, reported for Colombia by Mantilla-Meluk and Baker (2008) and Mantilla-Meluk et al. (2009); A. luismamteli Molinari 1994 with type locality in Merida, Venezuela, confirmed in Colombia by Mantilla-Meluk and Baker (2006). Alberico et al. (2000) mentioned Perez? (unknown date) as bibliographic reference for A. luismanueli in Colombia; this work corresponds to a draft never published based on preliminary identifica¬ tions (some of which were made by the senior author as a student at the 1CN). Mantilla-Meluk et al. (2009) provide additional information on the taxonomic dif¬ ferentiation between A. aequatoris and A. luismanueli in Colombia; Lichonycteris degener Miller 1931 with type locality in Para, Belem, Brazil, recognized as a different taxon from L. obscura by Gardner (2008). The only published reference of a Colombian specimen of L. degener is found in Montenegro and Romero-Ruiz (2000); Lonchophylla cadenai Woodman and Timm 2006 with type locality in Buenaventura, Valle del Cauca; L. chocoana Davalos 2004 with type locality in the vicinity of Alto Tambo, Ecuador; L. orcesi* Albuja and Gardner 2005 with type locality in Las Pambiles, Rio Piedras, Cordillera de Toisan, Esmeraldas, Ecua¬ dor; L. orienticollina Davalos and Corthals 2009 with type locality at the intersection of Cano Guamalito and Cano La Curia, Meta, Colombia; L. pattoni * Woodman and Timm 2006 with type locality in Reserva Cusco Amazonico, north bank Rio Madre de Dios, 14 km east Puerto Maldonado, Tambopata, Peru. The inclu¬ sion of L. pattoni within the list of species potentially present in the Colombia was based on specimens that partially matched L. pattoni description from Leticia, Amazonas deposited at the 1CN; however, further re¬ view is necessary to confirm its presence in the country. In addition, the distribution of L. pattoni was recently extended to Ecuadorian province of Pastaza (Mantilla- Meluk et al. 2009) in the Ecuadorian Amazon that shares the ecological characteristics of the Colombian southern Amazon; Carollia monohernandezi Cuartas and Gonzalez 2004 with type locality in Villaraz, Florencia, Caqueta, Colombia; Sturnira koopmanhilli McCarthy et al. 2006 with type locality in Las Pambiles, Reserva Ecologica Cotacachi-Cayapas, Esmeraldas, Ecuador; S. mistratensis Contreras and Cadena 2000 type locality in Puerto de Oro, Risaralda, Colombia; Platyrrhinus altericoi Velazco 2005 with type locality in San Pedro, Paucartambo-Pilcopata road. Department of Cuzco confirmed in Colombian by Velazco et al. (in press); P. aquilus (Handley and Ferris 1972) with ty pe locality in the head of Rio Pucro, 4,100 ft Cerro Mali, Darien, Panama elevated and confirmed in Colombia by Velazco and Gardner (in press); P. incarum , previ¬ ously considered a subspecies of P. helleri (Vampyrops zarhinus incarum) (Thomas 1912) with type locality in Posuzo, Pasco, Peru, elevated to species and con¬ firmed in Colombia by Velazco et al. (in press) based on material from Leticia, Amazonas; P. ismaeli Ve¬ lazco 2005 with type locality in Balsas, Chachapoyas, Amazonas Peru; P. matapalensis* Velazco 2005 with type locality in Matapalo, Zarumilla, Tunibes, Peru; P. nigellus, described as Vampyrops nigelliis by Gardner and Carter (1972) withtype locality in Huahuanchayo, Ayacucho, Peru, elevated and confirmed in Colombia by Velazco (2005); P. umbratus (Lyon 1902), recog¬ nized by Simmons (2005) with type locality in San Miguel, Macotama River, Magdalena Colombia; P. sp. nov. (Velazco and Gardner in press) described from the Biogeographic Choco region of Colombia and Ecuador and closely related to P. vittatus ; Derma- nura bogotensis (Andersen 1906) with type locality in Curiche, near Bogota, Cundinamarca, Colombia, elevated by Lim et al. 2008; D. rosenbergi* Thomas 1897 potentially present in Colombia, with type locality in Cachavi, Esmeraldas, Ecuador, elevated by Solari et al. (in press); this taxon was previously considered a junior synonym of D. glauca by Simmons (2005) and included under the genus Artibeus (as A. glaucus ) by Alberico etal. (2000). Models of potential distribution .— Models of potential distribution of phyllostomid species present and potentially present in Colombia are shown in Ap¬ pendix I and II, respectively. The models of potential Mantilla-Meluk et al.—Phyllostomid Bats of Colombia 15 distribution of species of dubious records in Colombia such as N. pusilla and S. ega were included within Appendix II. Our models of potential distribution rep¬ resent the first attempt to incorporate the available computational technology, particularly Geographic Information Systems (GIS), to produce more biologi¬ cally meaningful predicted distributions for a large set of geographically related phyllostomid species, using a homogeneous analytical procedure which allows repeatability and improvement. The procedure allowed us to more rigorously delineate potential distributional limits in comparison with previous efforts using only marginal records, such as those by Patterson et al. (2007) and Gardner (2008). Although tor some species the models could overestimate the actual distribution, the methodology may prove useful in delimiting distri¬ butional ranges of Colombian phyllostomids. Models of potential distribution of Colombian phyllostomid bats presented in this work are available in various formats (grid , ascii, pdf, and jpeg) at the website of the Natural Science Research Laboratory, Museum of Texas Tech University (www.nsrl.ttu.edu). General phyllostomid distributional patterns .— The Colombian territory is ecosystemically diverse due to a combination of complex geologic, ecological, and biogeographic processes that result in a variety of niche opportunities for phyllostomid bats. One of the most remarkable aspects of the Colombian geography is its location in the northwestern corner of South America, adjacent to and communicating with the Panamanian Isthmus. Northwestern South America has been identi¬ fied as the epicenter of the great bidirectional exchange of fauna between North and South America during the Late Tertiary (Hershkovitz 1972). In addition, the proximity of the Colombian territory to putative centers of speciation in South America, Central America, and the Caribbean (Hershkovitz 1972) has contributed not only to the high number of species reported for Co¬ lombia, but also to the complexity of regional species arrangements found in our analyses. The geographic diversity of the Colombian territory can be divided into five natural regions as follows: Amazon, Andean, Caribbean, Orinoquia, and Pacific (Choco), each one characterized by unique arrangements of ecologi¬ cal variables (Hernandez Camacho et al. 1992). Our analyses associated the greatest number of species with the Andean (85 species) and Amazon regions (74 species), followed by the Pacific with 64 species, the Caribbean with 62 species, and the Orinoquia with 41 species (Table 4). Although a large number of species were shared among regions (Table 4), some species were documented from only one region (Appendix IV) as follows: Amazon region, 14 unique species, including the debated N. pusilla and S. ega ; Andean, 12; and Pacific, 7. Multiple correlation analyses between phyllosto¬ mid richness and environmental variables showed that phyllostomid richness in Colombia had a significant, positive correlation with temperature and precipitation and a significant and negative correlation with elevation (Table 5). The higher numbers of species were found in areas with average precipitation greater than 2,000 mm, average temperature greater than 25°C, and eleva¬ tions lower than 1,000 m (Fig. la,b and Cover Figure) (Table 5). The above mentioned conditions are common across the country and dominate the lowland forested areas of the piedmonts of the Andean system and the Amazon regions. The comparison between results from our regional species counting and results on species ac¬ cumulation in our richness model suggests a greater geographic partitioning among species distributed along the Andean region with respect to the Amazon region. Although the overall number of species poten¬ tially present in the Andean region was greater than that in the Amazon region, the potential number of sympatric species per unit of area in our richness model was greater in the Amazon. The pattern observed in our richness model can be related to the environmen¬ tal heterogeneity typically associated with elevational ranges, as well as the lower area occupied by potentially suitable environments. Conversely, stratified forests prevalent hi the lowlands of Colombia are widely distributed across the Amazon offering multiple niche opportunities for phyllostomid bats, particularly for animalivorous and frugivorous forms (Medellin et al. 2000; Jimenez-Ortega and Mantilla-Meluk 2008). The greatest concentration of species in our species richness model occurred on the Guiana-Amazon corridor (Cover Figure). This corridor is characterized by terraces (200 to 500 m) of Cambric origin associated with the Guiana Shield. We hypothesize that these terraces constituted emergent land masses that recruited bat species during the repeated invasions of water masses on the lowlands of northwestern South America during the Miocene. 16 Special Publications, Museum of Texas Tech University Table 4. Comparisons of phyllostomid species composition among Colombian natural regions. Species Unique Species Andean Caribbean Orinoquia Pacific Amazon 74 14 50 46 40 41 Andean 85 12 - 56 36 51 Caribbean 62 0 - - 36 46 Orinoquia 41 0 - - - 35 Pacific 64 7 - - - - Number of species 8000 - 5000 - 4000 |i=: ■ | 3000 - , .f 2000 ill I 1000 - 0 ■ > 1 i t i j 1 III ULjul! uiiji 1 iiiiiiip.:., 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Number of species Figure 1. Scatter plots showing the positive correlation between phyllostomid species richness in Colombia, expressed in number of species, and mean annual temperature of the coldest month of the year, expressed in Celsius degrees (left); and the negative correlation between phyllostomid species richness in Colombia, expressed in number of species, and elevation, expressed in meters above sea level (right). Table 5. Results of Spearman correlation between richness and environmental variables (** significant at p>0.01). Correlations were based on values extracted from raster layers (N = 14,560). MAP = mean annual precipitation; TCMY = mean annual temperature of the coldest month of the year. Richness Elevation MAP TCMY Richness 0 Elevation -0.38978 ** 0 1.4565E-29 Precipitation 0.37947 ** -0.10209 0 9.4415E-56 Temperature 0.48327 ** -0.76253 0.14187 0 Mantilla-Meluk et al.—Phyllostomid Bats of Colombia 17 For a significant period of the early to mid Miocene (23-17 Mya), the Colombian Amazon was under the influence of the lake formation of Pebas (Wesselingh and Salo 2006). Posterior inundations were apparently frequent during the mid and late Miocene (Hovikoski et al. 2007, and references in there) and elevations greater than 200 m could play an important role in the establishment of forested environments typically preferred by phyllostomids. Among Colombian regions, the Andean, the Ca¬ ribbean, and the Pacific were most similar in terms of species composition (Fig. 2a) (Table 4). High levels of similarity among the Andean, Caribbean, and Pacific re¬ gions are the consequence of the convergence of species distribution in the northwestern corner of the country. This portion of the country is flanked by the Pacific Ocean and the Caribbean Sea, and it is isolated from the eastern portion of country by the highland of the Andes. Hemandez-Camacho et al. (1992) identified the southwestern portion of the Colombian Caribbean as an independent ecological unit. Hernandez-Camacho et al. (1992) divided the Caribbean into three zones: 1) the isolated mountainous system of the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta; 2) the Arid Peri-Caribbean belt, with low precipitation, characterized by the presence of arid and semi arid environments; and 3) a region associated with the flooded fans of the Cauca and Magdalena Rivers. The latter zone is proposed to be ecologically connected with the northern portion of the Biogeographic Choco constituting the Choco-Magdalena Biogeographic zone. Mantilla-Meluk and Jimenez-Ortega (2006) identified a latitudinal bat species turnover along the Colombian Biogeographic Choco, and recognized the northern portion of the Colombian Pacific Coast as a biogeographic unit for chiropterans. In our models, phyllostomid lowland species distributed across the Pacific and the Caribbean regions in Colombia typi¬ cally extended their distributions into adjacent Central America (i.e., Dermanura phaeotis, D. rava, and D. watsoni ) (Solari et al. in press). The isolation of the western portion of Colombia caused by the highlands of the Andean system also is responsible for the dis¬ tributional patterns observed among members of the subfamily Lonchophyllinae. Nectar feeders in the genus Lonchophylla are typical representatives of the Colom- Figure 2. a) Colombian natural regions as defined by Hernandez-Camacho et al. (1992) and phenogram of our hier¬ archical cluster analysis showing similarities in species composition among regions, b) Map of northwestern South America showing the potential biogeographic units for Colombian phyllostomid bats; dashed line shows the hypo¬ thetical division between the northern Colombian Amazon (Guianan Amazon) and the southern Colombian Amazon. Encircled area represents the southernmost limit of the hyper humid conditions of the Biogeographic Choco (black), which acts as a filter of species on the western side of the country. The area in grey represents the most humid portion in the Caribbean region considered as an extension of the northern portion of the Biogeographic Choco. 18 Special Publications, Museum of Texas Tech University bian Chocoan fauna and several species extend their distribution into northern Ecuador (i.e., Lonchophylla cadenai, L. chocoanct , L. concava , L.fornicata and L. orcesi *) (Mantilla-Me luk 2007). This combination of common regional distributional patterns and phyloge¬ netic affinities illustrate the influence of Colombian geography on the evolutionary history of the above mentioned groups. The formation of the Chocoan and Caribbean regions are relatively recent events associ¬ ated with the final period of the Andean uplifting (5 to 3 Mya) and the creation of the Inter-Andean valleys and their associated flooded fans that filled the lowlands of primal northwestern South America (Martinez 1997; Ercilla et al. 2002), Prior to the final uplifting of the Andes, xerophytic environments associated with the effect of the Alisios winds extended their distribu¬ tion along the northern coast of South America. The completion of the Isthmus of Panama and the devia¬ tion of the Humboldt marine current resulted in the predominant hyper-humid environments of Central Choco (Fig, 2b). The presence of the Chocoan hyper- humid forest represents an ecological hiatus between the Central American-Caribbean dry corridor and the xerophytic forest in central and southern Ecuador. On its easternmost portion, xerophytic environments in the lowland of the Colombian Caribbean region are interrupted by the highlands of the Serrania del Perija, which isolates the Colombian and the Venezuelan Ca¬ ribbean coasts. It is likely that species with a Central American origin colonized the country following arid ecosystems, while it is plausible that species with a Guiana-Amazonian origin colonized western Colombia using the lowland passes of the pre-Andean system. The current predominant hyper-humid conditions of central Choco constitute an additional natural barrier isolating phyllostomid populations from the southern Colombian Choco and Ecuador. The Colombian Andes play a double role as an effective barrier for isolating natural populations on the eastern and western versants of the system as well as a source of innumerable niche opportunities for phyl¬ lostomid bats, recruiting species from the other regions. Our analysis revealed that richness distribution among phyllostomids decreased with elevation, with a large number of species concentrated on the piedmonts of the Andes and few groups adapted to highland ecosys¬ tems (Cover Figure and Fig. lb). Among phyllostomid highland specialists are representatives of the subtribe Anourina, genus Anoura , as well as representatives of the genera Platyrrhinus and Sturnira. All species in the genus Anoura are represented in Colombia (Mantilla-Meluk and Baker 2006, 2008) and have an apparent geographic subdivision thought to be associ¬ ated with the uprising pattern of the three main units of the Colombian Andes. Ranges of highland phyl¬ lostomid specialists such as Anoura, Platyrrhinus, and Sturnira suggest that the Colombian Central and Western Cordilleras act as a single unit separated from the Eastern Coordillera by the Inter-Andean Valley of the Magdalena River. The greatest difference in phyllostomid species composition among Colombian regions was found be¬ tween the Pacific and the Amazon-Orinoquia regions, which are separated by the Andes (Table 4). Although several putative phyllostomid species have a trans- Andean distribution, molecular analyses conducted on conspecific populations from both versants of the Andes have resulted in the identification of higher lev¬ els of genetic differentiation than would be expected for conspecific taxa (Hoffman and Baker 2003; Baker et al 2004; Baker and Bradley 2006; Velazco and Pat¬ terson 2008). The above mentioned studies concluded that the Andean system is an effective barrier to gene flow, thus promoting speciation. The Colombian Orinoquia has the fewest number of phyllostomid species. The Llanos Orientales of the Colombian Orinoquia constitute a large low-lying plain, and among phyllostomid bats there are very few spe¬ cies specialized for use of open spaces. It appears that the open savannas of the Orinoquia do not offer many niche opportunities for phyllostomid forest specialists. The Colombian Orinoquia is characterized by dramatic fluctuations of ecological variables and the strong en¬ vironmental gradient that prevails along its geography has an edaphic, rather than a climatic, basis: extensive sandstone areas in the east of Colombia provide a free- draining substrate, and hence a water-stressed environ¬ ment for the vegetation that resulted in open tropical dry forest and steppe biomes (Marchant et al 2006). Edaphic conditions of the Orinoquia prevent the development of stratified forest in the region. However, gallery forests are common on the margins of the water Mantilla-Meluk et al.—Phyllostomid Bats of Colombia 19 courses. We hypothesize that gallery forests have a limited carrying capacity for recruitment and establish¬ ment of species diversity typical of mature forests. In addition, climate in the Llanos Orientales can be clas¬ sified as tropical diurnal with differences in monthly temperature generally small but with daily fluctuations that may be large (20°C), especially during the dry season. The climate is dominated by the Inter-Tropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) and moisture derived from the Atlantic Ocean. The two rainy seasons, from March to May and from October to December, are separated by dry seasons from January to February and from June to September. The average precipitation is 950 mm with an average of 175 mm in March; however, there is considerable variation (Berrio et al. 2003). Current climatic conditions observed on the savannas of the Colombian Orinoquia have dominated this region for at least 4000 years, since the Early and Middle Holocene (Marchant et al. 2006). Status of the knowledge on Colombian phyllosto¬ mid bats .—As it is attested by results obtained in this work, the Colombian territory holds a unique and rich mammalian fauna, and a national plan for its study is urgently needed. An analysis of 17,778 phyllostomid bat museum records (Fig. 3) revealed a sampling bias of phyllostomids, primarily as a result of major Colom¬ bian academic centers being located within cities in the Andes and collecting localities being primarily adjacent to these cities. Many Colombian geographic areas and Figure 3. Map of Colombia showing the distribution of sampling localities of Phyllostomid bats associated with the 17,778 records analyzed in this study. Encircled areas represent the sampling bias of phyllostomids collecting localities primarily adjacent to major cities in Colombia as fol¬ lows 1) Santafe de Bogota, 2) Santiago de Cali, and 3) Medellin. 20 Special Publications, Museum of Texas Tech University taxa remain underrepresented, and this is particularly true for areas and taxa that potentially contain the high¬ est diversity of phyllostomid species. This work proves that the extensive collections of mammals deposited in Colombian institutions constitute an incredibly valu¬ able resource. However, intense curatorial work is urgently required. We invite the international scientific community to validate these collections through their use as a scientific resource. Systematics is a rapidly developing field in South America (Voss 2009) and the participation of the international community is crucial for the development and consolidation of a proactive Colombian school in systematics and evolu¬ tion. International institutions which have benefitted and enriched their own collections in the past with Colombian specimens, and South America for that matter, should create the mechanisms to facilitate ac¬ cess to specimens, particularly holotype material which greatly improve systematic studies in Colombia. We celebrate efforts by institutions such as the AMNH and TTU tor leading the path in digitizing specimens made accessible via internet. We also applaud local efforts in documenting the Colombian mammalian diversity made by the various academic institutions holding col¬ lections. It is also remarkable the labor of the lnstituto Alexander von Humboldt through the creation of the series of checklists of Biota Colombiana. In this work we follow Alberico et al. (2000) as well as the series of departmental checklists published in Biota Colom¬ biana as primary source of reference for phyllostomid records. Initiatives like these ensure the generation of the knowledge required for the adequate conservation and management of Colombian natural resources. It is hoped this work will stimulate additional research to fulfill the gaps of information on Colombian phyl¬ lostomid bats identified herein. Acknowledgments This work would not be possible without the steady field work and curatorial process of staff at the various museum collections used as resource. We are particularly thankful to the staff of the lnstituto de Ciencias Naturales of the Universidad Nacional de Colombia and especially Y Munoz-Saba and A. Cadena for their advice and assistance during the vari¬ ous stages of this work. We also thank B. D. Patterson, W. B. Stanley, L. R Heaney, P. Velazco, and C. Dick for assistance at the collections of the FMNH, as well as the Thomas J. Dee and Karl P. Schmidt Funds of Field Museum’s Scholarship Committee for financial support to visit their collections; D. E. Wilson, A. L. Gardner, and L. Gordon for assistance at the mam¬ mal collections of the Smithsonian Institution; A. Rodriguez-Bolanos, for access and assistance at the collections of the UD; A. Asprilla and L. Palacios for assistance at the collections of the UTCH; H. Gamer for assistance at the NSRL. We appreciate the cooperation of J. Zak and the Department of Biological Sciences of TTU. We are greatly indebted to J. Martinez Berrio, P. Gomez-Sandoval, M. A. Hoyos, F. A. Suarez, and A. Marin for their assistance in data collection. We thank Cibele Caio, Liz Siles, M, McDonough, R. Marchan, J. Parlos, L. Davalos, S. Solari, J. P. Carrera, M. Pinto, P. Larsen, P. Velazco, H. E. Ramirez, and M. E. Rodriguez for their insightful comments on the taxonomy and distribution of Colombian phyllostomids. Finally, we thank E. Bradley and N. de la Sancha for their valuable editorial assistance, as well as J. Salazar-Bravo and S. Solari for excellent critical reviews of this work. Literature Cited Alberico, M., and A. J. Negret. 1992. Primer aporte sobre los mamiferos del Valle del Patia. Novedades Colombianas, Museo de Historia Natural, Universidad del Cauca, Nueva Epoca 5:66-71. Alberico, M., and E. Velasco. 1991. Description of a new broad¬ nosed bat from Colombia. Bonner zoologische Beitrage 42:237-239. Alberico, M. and J. Orejuela. 1983. Diversidad especifica de dos comunidades de murcielagos en Narifio, Colombia. Cespedesia 11:31-40. Alberico, M, A. Cadena, J. Hemandez-Camacho, and Y. Munoz- Saba. 2000 Mamiferos (Synapsida: Theria) de Colombia. Biota Colombiana l(l):43-75. Mantilla-Meluk et al.—Phyllostomid Bats of Colombia 21 Albuja, V. L., and A. L Gardner. 2005. Anew species of Lon- chophylla Thomas (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) from Ecuador. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Wash¬ ington ll8(2):442-449. Allen, J. A. 1890. Notes on a small collection ofWest Indian bats, with descriptions of an apparently new species. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 3:203-18. Allen, J. A. 1900. List of bats collected by Mr. H. H. Smith in the Santa Marta region of Colombia, with descriptions of new species. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 13:89-94. Allen, J. A. 1916. List of mammals collected in Colombia by the American Museum of Natural History expeditions, 1910-1915. Bulletin of the American Museum ofNatural History 35:191-238. Allen, J. A., and F. M. Chapman. 1893. On a collection of mam¬ mals from the island of Trinidad, with descriptions of new species. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 5:203-234. Andersen, K. 1906. Brief diagnosis of a new genus and ten new forms of stenodennatous bats. Annals and Magazine of Natural History series 7,18:419-423. Arata, A. A., J. B. Vaughn, K. E. Newell, R. A. J. Barth, and M. Gracian. 1968. Salmonella and Shigella infections in bats in selected areas of Colombia. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 17:92-95. Bangs, O. 1900. List of the mammals collected in the Santa Marta region by W. W. Brown Jr. Proceedings of the New Zeland Zoological Club 1:87-102. Baker, R. J., H. H. Genoways, and A. Cadena. 1972. The phyl- lostomatid bat, Vampyressabrocki, in Colombia. Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Sciences 71:4. Baker, R. J., C. S. Hood, and R. L. Honeycutt. 1989. Phylogenetic relationships and classification of the higher categories of the New World bat family Phyllostomidae. Systematic Zoology 38:228-238. Baker, R. J., S. R. Hoofer, C. A. Porter, and R. A. Van Den Bussche. 2003. Diversification among New World Leaf¬ nosed Bats: an evolutionary hypothesis and classification inferred from digenomic congruence of DNA sequence. Occasional Papers, Museum of Texas Tech University 230:i+1-32. Baker, R. J., R. M. Fonseca, D. A. Parish, C. J. Phillips, and F. G. Hoffmann. 2004, New bat of the genus Lophostoma (Phyllostomidae. Phyllostominae) from northwestern Ecuador. Occasional Papers, Museum of Texas Tech University 232:i+l-16. Bangs, 0.1900. List of the mammals collected in the Santa Marta region of Colombia by W.W. Brown, Jr. Proceedings of the New England Zoological Club 1:87-l 02. Barriga-Bonilla, E. 1965. Estudios mastozoologicos colombia- nos, I. Chiroptera. Caldasia 9:241-271. Barquez, R. M., M. A. Mares, and J. Braun. 1999. The bats of Argentina. Special Publications, Museum of Texas Tech University 42:1-275. Berrio, J. C., Arbelaez M. V., Duivenvoorden J. F., Cleef, and A. Hooghiemstra, H. 2003. Pollen representation and successional vegetation change on the sandstone plateau of Araracuara, Colombian Amazonia. Review of Palaeo- botany and Palynnology. 126, 163-181. Bradley, R. D., and R. J. Baker. 2001. A test of the Genetic Spe¬ cies Concept: cytochrome-b sequences and mammals. Journal of Mammalogy 82(4):960-973. Carter, D. C., and P. G. Dolan. 1978. Catalogue of type speci¬ mens of Neotropical bats in selected European museums. Special Publications, Museum of Texas Tech University 15:1-136. Ceballos, G., and G. Oliva. 2007. Los mamiferos silvestres de Mexico. Sociedad para el conocimiento y uso de la diver- sidad fondo de cultura economica, Mexico. 986 p. Coats, A. G., and J. A Obando. 1996. The geologic evolution of the Central American Isthmus. In: Evolution and environ¬ ment of in Tropical America. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 425 p. Contreras, M., and A. Cadena. 2000. Una nueva especie del genero Sturnira (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) de los Andes colombianos. Revista de la Academia de Ciencias Exactas, Fisicas y Naturales XXIV(91 ):285-287. Cuartas, C. A., J. Munoz, and M. Gonzalez. 2001. Una nueva especie de Carollia Gray, 1838 (Chiroptera: Phyllosto¬ midae) de Colombia. Actualidades Biologicas 23(75):63- 73. Cuervo Diaz, A., J. Hernandez Camacho, A. Cadena G. 1986. Lista actualizada de los mamiferos de Colombia: anota- ciones sobre su distribution. Caldasia 15:471-501. Davalos, L. 2004. A new chocoan species of Lonchophylla (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae). American Museum No- vitates 3426:1-16. Davalos, L. and A. Corthals. 2009. A new species of Lon¬ chophylla (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) from the eastern Andes of northwestern South America. American Mu¬ seum Novitates 3635:1-16. Davis, W. B. 1968. Review of the Genus Uroderma (Chiroptera). Journal of Mammalogy 49:676-698. de la Torre, L. 1956. The dental fonnula of the bats of the ge¬ nus Diaenms. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 69:191 -192. Dobson, G. E. 1878. Catalogue of the Chiroptera in the collec¬ tion of the British Museum. British Museum (Natural History). London, xlii + 567 + PI I-XXX. Dobson, G. E. 1880. On some new or rare species of Chiroptera in the collection of the Gottingen Museum. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1880:461-465, PI. XLVI. 22 Special Publications, Museum of Texas Tech University dos Reis, N. R, A. L. Perachi, W. A. Pedro, and I. P. de Lima (eds). 2007. Morcegos do Brasil. Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina 253 p. Ercilla, G. B. Alonso, F. Estrada, F. L. Chiocci, J., Baraza, and M. Farran. 2002. The Magdalena turbidite system (Ca¬ ribbean Sea): present-day morphology and architecture model. Marine Geology 185, 303-318. Fonseca, R. M. and C. M. Pinto. 2004. A new Lophostoma (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae: Phyllostominae) from the Amazonia of Ecuador Occassional Papers Museum of Texas Tech University 242:1 -9. Fonseca, R. M., etal. 2007. Morphological and molecular varia¬ tion within little big-eared bats of the genus Micronycteris (Phyllostomidae: Micronycterinae) from San Lorenzo, Ecuador. Pp. 721-746 in The quintessential naturalist: honoring the life and legacy of Oliver P. Pearson (D. A. Kelt, E. P. Lessa, J. Salazar-Bravo, and J. L, Patton, eds.). University of California Publications in Zoology 134:1-981. Furman, D. P. 1966. The spinturnicid mites of Panana (Acarina: Spinturnicidae). Pp. 125-166 in Ectoparasites of Panama (R.L. Wenzel and V.J. Tipton, eds.). Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago. Gardner, A. L. 1977. Feeding Habits. Pp. 293-350 in Biology of bats of the New World Family Phyllostomidae Part II (R. J. Baker. J K. Jones, Jr. and D. C Carter, Eds ). Special Publications Museum Texas Tech Universityl3:l-364. Gardner, A. L. 2008. Mammals of South America, Volume 1 Marsupials, Xenarthrans, shrews, and Bats. The Univer¬ sity of Chicago Press, Chicago and London. 669 pp. Gardner, A. L. and D. C. Carter. 1972. A new Stenodermatinae bat (Phyllostomidae) from Peru. Occasional Papers, Museum Texas Tech University 2:1-4. Goldman, E. A. 1914. Description of five new mammals from Panama and Mexico. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Col¬ lections, 60(2): 1-18. Grffiths T„ A. and A. L, Gardner. 2008. Subfamily Glossophagi- nae Bonaparte, 1845. Pp. 224-244 in Mammals of South America, Volume 1 Marsupials, Xenarthrans, shrews, and Bats (A. L. Gardner Ed.). The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London. Handley, C. O. 1960. Descriptions of new bats from Panama. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 112:459-479. Hall, E. R. and K. R. Kelson. 1959. The mammals of North America. The Ronald Press New York. 546 pp. Handley, C. O. 1984. New species of mammals from northern South America: A long tongue bat genus Anoura Gray. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 97:513-521. Handley, C. O. 1987. New species of mammals from Northern South America: fruit-eating bats, genus Artibens Leach. Pp. 163-172 in Studies inNeotropical Mammalogy (B.D. Patterson and R. M. Timm, eds ). Essays in Honor of Philip Hershkovitz, Fieldiana: Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago. Handley, C. O. 1966. Descriptions of new bats (Choeroniscus and Rhinophylla) from Colombia. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 79:83-88. Handley, C. O., and G. J. Ochoa. 1997. New species of mam¬ mals from northern South America: A sword-nosed bat genus Lonchorhina Tomes (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae). Memorias de la Sociedad de CienciasNaturales La Salle 57:71-82. Hernandez-Camacho, J., and A. Cadena. 1978. Notas para la revision del Genera Lonchorhina (Chiroptera, Phyllos¬ tomidae). Caldasia 12:199-251. Hernandez-Camacho, J , A. Hurtado , R. Ortiz, and T. Walsch- burger. 1992. Unidades biogeograficas de Colombia Pp. 105-151 in La Diversidad Biologica de Iberoamerica (I. G, Halffter, ed ). Acta Zoologica Mexicana, Institute de Ecologia, A.C., Mexico, Mexico. Hershkovitz, P. 1949. Mammals of northern Colombia. Prelimi¬ nary report No.5: Bats (Chiroptera). Proceedings of the United States National Museum 99:429-454. Hershkovitz, P. 1972. The recent mammals of the Neotropical Region: A zoogeographic and ecological review. Pp. 311- 431 in Evolution, Mammals, and Southern Continents (A. Keast, F. C. Erk and B. Glass, eds.), Albany State University Press, New York. Hill, J. E. 1965. Notes on bats from British Guiana, with the description of a new genus and species of Phyllosto¬ midae. Mammalia 28:553-572. [Dated 1964; number 4 published in 1965.] Hoffmann, F. G., and R. J. Baker. 2003. Comparative phylo- geography of short-tailed bats ( CaroUici : Phyllostomidae). Molecular Ecology 12:3403-3414. Hoofer, S. R., S. Solari, P. A. Larsen, R. D. Bradley, and R. J. Baker. 2008. Phylogenetics of the fruit-eating bats (Phyl¬ lostomidae: Artibeina) inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Occasional Papers, Museum of Texas Tech University 277:1-15. Hoofer, S. R., and R. A. Van Den Bussche. 2003. Molecular phylogenetics of the chiropteran family Vespertillionidae. Acta Chiropterologica 5, supplement: 1-63. Hovikoski, J., M. Gringas, M. Rasanen, L. A. Rebata, J. Guer¬ rero, A. Ranzi, J. Melo, L. Romero, F. Jaimes, and S. Lopez. 2007. The nature of Miocene Amazonian epi¬ continental embayment: High frequency shifts of low gradient coastline. Geological Society of America Bul¬ letin. 119:1506-1520. IUCN, Conservation International, Arizona State University, Texas A&M University, University of Rome, Univer¬ sity of Virginia, Zoological Society London. 2008. An Analysis of Mammals on the 2008 IUCN Red List Mantilla-Meluk et al.—Phyllostomid Bats of Colombia 23 . Downloaded on 9 October 2008. Jimenez-Ortega A. M. andH. Mantilla-Meluk. 2008. El papel de la tala selectiva en la conservacion de bosques tropicales y al utilidad de los murcielagos como bioindicadores de disturbio. RevistaInstitucional Universidad Tecnologica del Choco Diego Luis Cordoba 27(1): 100-108. Koopman, K. F. 1982. Biogeography of the bats of South America. Pp. 273-302 in Mammalian biology in South America (M. A. Mares and H. H. Genoways, eds). Uni¬ versity of Pittsburg, Pittsburgs, Pensylvania. Koopman, K. F. 1993. Order Chiroptera. Pp. 137-241 In Mam¬ mal Species of the World: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Second edition (D. E. Wilson and D M. Reeder, eds. ). Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington. LaVal, R. K. and B. Rodrlguez-FI. Los murcielagos de Costa Rica. 2002. Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad, INBio 320 p. Laurie, E. M. O. 1955. Notes on some mammals from Ecua¬ dor. Annals and Magazine of Natural History series 12 8:268-276. Lee, T. E., Jr., S. R. Hoofer, and R. A. Van Den Busche. 2002. Molecular phylogenetics and systematic revision of the genus Tonatia (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae). Journal of Mammalogy. 83:49-57. Lemke, T. O. and J. R. Tamsitt. 1979. Anoura cu/trata (Chi¬ roptera: Phyllostomatidae) from Colombia. Mammalia 43:579-58 f. Lemke, T O., A. Cadena, R. H. Pine and J. I. Hemandez-Cama- cho. 1982. Notes on opossums, bats, and rodents new to the fauna of Colombia. Mammalia 2(46):225-234. Lim, B. K., W. A. Pedro, and F. C. Passos. 2003. Differentiaton ans specie status of the Neotropical yellow-eared bats Vampyressapusilla and V thyone (Phyllostomidae) with molecular phylogeny and review of the genus. Acta Chiropterologica 5:15-29. Lim, B. K., M D. Engstrom, J. C. Patton, and J. W. Bickham. 2008. Systematic review of small fruit-eating bats (Arti- beus) from the Guianas, and a re-evaluation of A. g/ciucus bototensis, Acta Chiropterologica 10(2):243-256. Linares, O. J., and J. Ojasti. 1971. Una nueva especie de mur- cielago del genero Lonchorhina (Chiroptera: Phyllos¬ tomidae) del sur de Venezuela. Novedades Cientificas, Serie Zoologica 36:1-8. Linares, O. J 1997. Los mamiferos de Venezuela. Sociedad de Conservacion Audubon de Venezuela. 688 pp. Lonnberg, E. 1921. A second contribution to the mammalogy of Ecuador, with some remarks on Coenolestes. Arkiv fur Zoologi Stockholm 14(4): 1-104. Lopez-Gonzalez, C. 2005. Murcielagos del Paraguay. Biosfera publicaciones del comite espanol del programa MaB y de la Red IberoMaB de UNESCO 300 p. Lyon, M. W., Jr. 1902. Descripton of anew phyllostome bat from the Isthmus of Panama. Proceedings of the Biological Society of London 15:151. Mantilla-Meluk H. 2007. Lonchophillini, the Chocoan bats. Revista Institucional Universidad Tecnologica del Choco Diego Luis Cordoba 26:49-57. Mantilla-Meluk H. and A. M. Jimenez-Ortega. 2006. Estado de conservacion y algunas consideraciones biogeograficas sobre la quiropterofauna del Choco Biogeografico Co- lombiano. Revista Institucional Universidad Tecnologica del Choco 25:10-17. Mantilla-Meluk, H. and R. J. Baker. 2006. Systematics of small Anoura (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) from Colombia, with description of a new species. Occasional Papers, Museum of Texas Tech University 261.1-18. Mantilla-Meluk, H. and R. J. Baker, 2008. Mammalia, Chi¬ roptera, Phyllostomidae, Anoura fistulata: First confirmed record for Colombia with phylogeographic notes. Check List 4(4):427-430. Mantilla-Meluk, H., A A. M. Jimenez-Ortega, and R. J. Baker. 2009. Mammalia, Chiroptera, Phyllostomidae: Lonchophylla pattoni : first record for Ecuador. Revista Institucional Universidad Tecnologica del Chocb Diego Luis Cordoba 28(1): 152-155. Mantilla-Meluk, H , A. A. M. Jimenez-Ortega, and R. J. Baker. 2009. Range extension of Anoura aequatoris and notes on distributional limits of small Anoura in Colombia. Revista Institucional Universidad Tecnologica del Choco Diego Luis Cordoba 28 (1): 107-112. Mantilla-Meluk, H, H. Ramirez-Chaves, C. Fernandez- Rodriguez, and R. J. Baker, (inpress). Notes on geograph¬ ic distribution; Mammalia, Chiroptera, Phyllostomidae, Anoura fistulata. Check List. Marchant, R., J. C. Berrio, H. Behling, A. Boom, andH. Hooghi- emstra. 2006. Colombian dry moist forest transitions in the Llanos Orientales, a comparison of model and pollen-based biome reconstructions. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 234:28-44. Marinkelle, C J. 1970. Vampyrops intermedins sp. n. from Co¬ lombia (Chiroptera, Phyllostomatidae). Revista Brasilera de Biologia 30:49-53. Marinkelle, C J., and A. Cadena. 1972. Notes on bats new to the fauna of Colombia. Mammalia 36:49-58. Marinkelle, C. J., and E. Grose. 1966. Importancia de los mur¬ cielagos para la salud publica con especial referenda a las micosis zoondticas. Antioquia Medica 16:179-94. Martinez, J. O., 1997. Zonas marinas, inlNGEOMINAS, Memo- ria explicativa del Atlas Geologico Digital de Colombia (Version 1.0). McLellan L. J., and K. F. Koopman. 2008. Subfamily Carol- liinae. Pp. 208-218 in Mammals of South America, Volume 1 Marsupials, Xenarthrans, shrews, and Bats 24 Special Publications, Museum of Texas Tech University (A. L. Gardner Ed.). The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London. McCarthy, T. J., L. Albuja, M. S. Alberico. 2006. A new species of Chocoan Stumira (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) from western Ecuador and Colombia. Annals of the Carnegie Museum 75(2):97-l 10. McCarthy, T. J., A. Cadena G., and T. O. Lemke. 1983. Com¬ ments on the first Tonatia carrikeri (Chiroptera: Phyl- lostomatidae) from Colombia Lozania. Acta Zoologica Colombiana 40:1-6. Medellin, R. A., M. Equihua, and M. A. Amin. 2000. Bat diver¬ sity and abundance as indicators of disturbance in Neotro¬ pical rainforests. Conservation Biology. 14:1666-1675. Miller, G. S., Jr. 1931. Two new South American bats. Journal of Mammalogy 12:411-41Z Miller, G. S., Jr. 1898. Descriptions of five new phyllostome bats. Proceedings of Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 50:326-337. Montenegro, O. L. and M Romero-Ruiz. 2000. Murcielagos del sector sur de la serrania de Chiribiquete, Caqueta, Co¬ lombia. Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias 23(SuplementoEspecial):641-49. [Dated 1999; published February 2000], Muchhala, N., P Mena V., and L. Albuja V. 2005. A new species of Anoura (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) from the Ecua¬ dorian Andes. Journal of Mammalogy 86:457-461. Munoz-Saba, Y. 1999. Los murcielagos del genero Artibeus Leach, 1821 (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae: Stenorder- matinae) de Colombia. Tesis de Maestria, Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Santafe de Bogota. Munoz, J. 1986. Murcielagos del Parque Natural “El Refu¬ gio” (Antioquia, Colombia). Actualidaddes Biologicas 15:66-76. Mufloz, J , C. A. Cuartas, and M. Gonzalez. 2004. Se describe una nueva especie de murcielago del genero Carollia Gray, 1838 (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) de Colombia. Actualidades Biologicas 26:80-90. Ochoa G, J., and C. Ibanez. J 984. Nuevo murcielago del genero Lonchorhina (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae). Memorias de la Sociedad de Ciencias Naturales La Salle 42:145-59. [Dated 1982; published 1984 ] Ospina-Ante, O., and L. G. Gomez. 2000. Riqueza, abundancia relativay patrones de actividad temporal de la comunidad de los murcielagos quiropteros de la Reserva Natural La Planada, Nanno, Colombia. Revista de la Academia Co¬ lombiana de Ciencias 23 (Suplemento Especial): 659-69 [Dated 1999; published February 2000 ] Patterson, B. D., G. Ceballos, W. Sechrest, M, F. Tognelli, T. Brooks, L. Luna, P. Ortega, I. Salazar, and B. E. Young. 2007. Digital distribution maps of the mammals of the western hemisphere, version 3.0. NatureServe. Arlington, Virginia. Peterson, R. L. and J. R. Tamsitt. 1968. Anew species of bat of the Genus Stumira (Family Phyllostomatidae) from northwestern South America. Life Sciences Occasional Papers, Royal Ontario Museum 12:1-8. Rouk, C. S. and D. C. Carter. 1972. Anew species of Vampyrops (Chiroptera: Phyllostomatidae) from South America. Occasional Papers, Museum of Texas Tech University 1:1-7. Sanborn, C. C. 1932. Neotropical bats in the Carnegie Museum. Annals of the Carnegie Museum 21:171 -183. Sanborn, C. C. 1941. Descriptions and records of Neotropical bats Field Museum of Natural History. Zoological Series 27:371-387. Sanborn, C. C. 1949. Bats of the genus Micronycteris and its subgenera. Fieldiana: Zoology, new series 31:215-233. Sanborn, C. C. 1955. Remarks on the bats of the genus Vampy¬ rops. Fieldiana: Zoology 37:403-413. Sanchez-Palomino, P, M. del P. Rivas-Pava, and A. Cadena. 1996. Diversidad biologica de una comunidad de quiropteros y su relacion con la estructura del habitat de bosque de galena, Serrania de la Macarena, Colombia. Caldasia 18:343-353. Shamel, H. H. 1927. A new bat from Colombia. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 40:129-130. Simmons, N. B. 2005. Order Chiroptera. Pp. 312-529 in Mam¬ mals Species of the World: a taxonomic and geographic reference, 3 fd edition (D. E. Wilson and D. M, Reeder. Eds.) Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Mary¬ land Simmons, N. B. 1996, A new species of Micronycteris (Chi¬ roptera: Phyllostomidae) from northeastern Brazil, with comments on phylogenetic relationships. American Museum Novitates 3158:1-35. Simmons, N. B., and R. S. Voss. 1998. The mammals of Paracou, French Guiana: A Neotropical lowland rainforest fauna, Part 1. Bats. Bulletin of the American Museum ofNatural History 237:1-219. Simmons, N. B., R. S. Voss, and D. W. Fleck. 2002. Anew Ama¬ zonian species of Micronycteris (Chiroptera: Phyllosto¬ midae) with notes on the roosting behavior of sympatric congeners. American Museum Novitates 3358:1-14. Solari, S., S. R. Hoofer, P. A. Larsen, A Brown, R. J. Bull, J. A. Guerrero, J. Ortega, J. P. Carrera, R. D. Bradley, and R. J. Baker, (in press). Operational criteria for genetically defined species: analysis of diversification of the small fruit-eating bats, Dermanura (Phyllostomidae: Stenoder- matinae). Acta Chiropterologica. Tamsitt, J. R., D. Valdivieso, and J. I. Hernandez-Camacho. 1965. Additional records of Choeroniscus in Colombia. Journal of Mammalogy 46:704. Teeling, E. C., M. S. Springer, O. Madsen, P Bates, S. J. O’Brien, and W. J. Murphy. 2005. A molecular phylogeny for bats illuminates biogeography and the fossil record. Science 307(5709):580-584. Mantilla-Meluk et al.—Phyllostomid Bats of Colombia 25 Tirira, D. 2007. Guia de campo de los mamiferos del Ecuador. Ediciones Murcielago Blanco. Publication especial sobre los mamiferos del Ecuador 6. Quito. 576 p. Thomas, O. 1909. Notes on some South-American mammals, with descriptions of new species. Annals and Magazine of Natural Elistory series 8(4): 230-242. Thomas, O. 1912. New bats and rodents from South America. Annals and Magazine of Natural History series 8 10:403- 11 . Thomas, O. 1913. A new genus of glossophagine bat from Co¬ lombia. Annals and Magazine of Natural History series 8,12:270-71. Thomas, O. 1897 Descriptions of new bats and rodents from America. Annals and Magazine of Natural History series 6 20:544-53. Tschudi, J. J. von. 1844. Mammalium conspectu. Archive Na- turgesche 10(1):244-55. Valdivieso, D. 1964. La fauna quiroptera del Departamento de Cundinamarca, Colombia. Revista de Biologia Tropical 12:19-45. Valdivieso, D., and J. R. Tamsitt. 1962. First records of the pale spear-nosed bat in Colombia. Journal of Mammalogy 43:422-423. Velazco, R M. 2005. Morphological phylogeny of the bat genus Platyrrhinus Saussure, 1860 (Chiroptera: Phyllostomi¬ dae) with the description of four new species. Fieldiana: Zoology 105:1-53. Velazco, R M. and B. D. Patterson. 2008. Phylogenetics and bio¬ geography of the broad-nosed bats. Genus Platyrrhinus (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 49:749-759. Velazco, P. M., and A, L. Gardner (in press) A new species of Platyrrhinus (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) from western Colombia and Ecuador, with emended diagnoses of P. aquilus , P. dorsalis, and P umbratus. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington. Addresses of authors: Hugo Mantilla-Meluk Department of Biological Sciences Box 43191 Texas Tech University Lubbock, TX 79409 Velazco, P. M., A. L. Gardner, and B. D. Patterson, (in press). Systematics of the Platyrrhinus helleri species complex (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae), with description of two new species. Zoological Journal of the Zoological Lin- nean Society. Voss, R. S. 2009. Book Review. Mammals of South America, Volume 1 Marsupials, Xenarthrans, shrews, and bats. Journal of Mammalogy. 90(2): 521-523. Webster, W. D. and J. K. Jones Jr. 1987. Anew subspecies of Glossophaga commissarisi (Chiroptera: Phy 1 lostomidae) from South America. Occasional Papers, Museum of Texas Tech University 109:1-6. Wesselingh, F. P, and J. A. Salo. 2006. AMiocene perspective on the evolution of the Amazonian biota. Scripta Geologica 133:439-457. Wetterer A. L. M, V. Rockman, and N. B. Simmons. 2000. Phylogeny of Phyllostomid bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera): data from diverse morphological systems, sex chromo¬ somes, and restricted sites. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 248:1-200. Wilson, D. E., and D. M. Reeder (eds ). 2005. Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3rd ed). Johns Hopkins University Press. Woodman, N. 2007. New species of nectar-feeding bat, genus Lonchophylla, from Western Colombia and Western Ecuador (Mammalia: Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 120(3): 340-358. Woodman, N., and R. M. Timm. 2006. Characters and phy¬ logenetic relationships of nectar-feeding bats, with descriptions of new Lonchophylla from western South America (Mammalia: Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae: Lon- chophyllini). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 119:437-476. Alex Mauricio Jimenez-Ortega Grupo de Investigacion en Manejo de Fauna Silvestre Chocoana Universidad Tecnologica del Choco, D.L.C. Quibdo, Colombia Robert J. Baker Department of Biological Sciences Box 43191 Texas Tech University Lubbock, TX 79409 26 Special Publications, Museum of Texas Tech University Appendix I Models of potential distribution for confirmed Colombian phyllostomid species. Lampronycteris hrachyotis Micronycteris minute Diphyila ecaudata Macrophyllum macrophyllum Lophostoma silvicolum Micronycteris hirsute Micronycteris schmidtorum Lochorhina aurita Micronycteris megalotis Desmodus rotundus Lochorhina marinkellei Trachops cirrhosus Lophostoma brasiliense Micronycteris microtis Diaemus youngi Lochorhina orinocensis Lophostoma carrikeri Mimon crenuiatum Mantilla-Meluk et al.—Phyllostomid Bats of Colombia 27 Appendix I (cont.) Phyllostomus latifolius Choeroniscus godmani Anoura cadenai Phyllostomus etonagtus Chrotopterus auritus Anoura caudifer Phylllostomus hastatus Vampyrum spectrum Anoura cultrata Anoura luismanueli Lichonycteris degener 28 Special Publications, Museum of Texas Tech University Appendix I (cont.) Lichonycteris obscura Glossophaga soricina Lonchophyila cfiocoana Lonchophylla orienticollina Carollia castanea Leptonyctens curasoe Lionycteris spurrelti Lonchophylla thomasi Carollia monohernandezi Carollia perspicillata Glossophaga longirostris Lonchophylla cadenai Lonchophylla handleyi Carollia brevicauda Rhinophylla alethina Mantilla-Meluk et al.—Phyllostomid Bats of Colombia 29 Appendix I (cont.) ^j/ p * I? V~i Rhinophylla fisherae Rhinophylla pumilio Glyphonycteris sylvestris Neonycteris pusilia Trinycteris nicefori Sturnira aratathonrasi Sturnira lilium Sturnira magna Sturnira tifdae Chiroderma trinitatum 30 Special Publications, Museum of Texas Tech University Appendix I (cont.) Platyrrhinus helhri Uroderma bilobatum Platyrrhinus umbratus Uroderma magnirostrum Mantilla-Meluk et al. Enchistenes hartii Artibeus jamaicensis Dermanura anderseni Dermanura phaeotis Phyllostomid Bats of Colombia 31 Appendix I (cont.) Artibeus concolor Artibeus planirostris Dermanura bogotensis Ametrida centurio Sphaeronycteris tnxophyffum 32 Special Publications, Museum of Texas Tech University Appendix II Models of potential distribution for phyllostomid species potentially present in Colombia. Micronycteris brosseti * Mycronicteris homezi Micronycteris matses* Lonchorhina iernandezP Lonchorhina inusitata* Lophostoma aequatorialis* Lophostoma yasuni* Scieronycteris eg a Platyrrhinus aurarius Platytthirtus matapafensis" Mantilla-Meluk et al.—Phyllostomid Bats of Colombia 33 Appendix III List of bibliographic references of published mammalian species checklists that include phyllostomid departmental records for Colombia. The listed references were used as sources in constructing column two of Table 1. Colombia in general. —Alberico, M., A. Cadena, J. Hernandez-Camacho, and Y. Munoz-Saba. 2000 Ma- miferos (Synapsida: Theria) de Colombia. Biota Colombiana l(l):43-75; Allen, J. A. 1900. List of bats collected by Mr. H. H. Smith in the Santa Marta region of Colombia, with descriptions of new species. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 13:89-94; Allen, J. A. 1916. List of mammals collected in Colombia by the American Museum of Natural History expeditions, 1910-1915. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 35:191-238; Arata, A. A., J. B. Vaughn, K. E. Newell, R. A. J. Barth, and M. Gracian. 1968. Salmonella and Shigella infections in bats in selected areas of Colombia. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 17:92-95; Bangs, O. 1900. List of the mammals collected in the Santa Marta region by W. W. Brown Jr. Proceedings of the New Zeland Zoological Club 1:87-102; Barriga-Bonilla, E. 1965. Estudios mastozoologicos colombianos, I. Chiroptera. Caldasia 9:241-271; Cuervo Diaz, A T , J. Hernandez Camacho, A. Cadena G. 1986. Lista actualizada de los mamiferos de Colombia: anotaciones sobre su distribution. Caldasia 15:471 -501; Gardner, A. L. 2008. Mammals of South America, Volume 1 Marsupials, Xenarthrans, shrews, and Bats. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London. 669 pp; Hershkovitz, P. 1949. Mammals of northern Colombia. Preliminary report No.5: Bats (Chiroptera). Proceedings of the United States National Museum 99:429-454; 1UCN, Conserva¬ tion international, Arizona State University, Texas A&M University, University of Rome, University of Virginia, Zoological Society London. 2008. An Analysis of Mammals on the 2008 1UCN Red List . Downloaded on 9 October 2008; Marinkelle, C. J., and A. Cadena. 1972. Notes on bats new to the fauna of Colombia. Mammalia 36:49-58. Regional and departmental records. — Antioquia:. Cuartas-Calle, C. A., J. Munoz-Arango. 2003. Lista de los mamiferos (Mammalia: Theria) del departamento de Antioquia, Colombia. Biota Colombiana. 4(l);65-78; Munoz, J. A. 1986; Murcielagos del parque natural “El Refugio” (Antioquia, Colombia). 1986. Actualidades Biologicas. 15(57):65-76; Munoz-Saba, Y., H. F. Lopez-Arevalo, and A. Cadena. 1999. Aportes al conocimeinto de la ecologia de los murcielagos de los ailoramientos de marmoles y calizas, sctor de Rio Claro (Antioquia, Colombia). Revista de la Acedemia de Ciencias Naturales Fisicas y Exactas de Colombia. Suplemento especial: 651-658; Caldas: Castano, J. H., Y. Munoz, J. E. Botero, and J. H. Velez. Mamiferos del departamento depar¬ tamento de Caldas-Colombia. 2003. Biota Colombiana. 4(2):247-259; Caqueta: Marin-Vazquez, A., and A. V. Aguilar-Gonzalez. 2005. Murcielagos (Chiroptera) del departamento de Caqueta-Colombia. Biota Colombiana. 6(2):211-218; Cauca: Alberico, M., and A. J. Negret. 1992. Primer aporte sobre los mamiferos del Valle del Patia. Novedades Colombianas, Museo de HistoriaNatural, Universidad del Cauca, Nueva Epoca 5:66-71; Rivas-Pava, M. P, H. E. Ramirez-Chaves, Z. 1. Alvarez, B. L. Nino Valencia. 2007. Catalogo de mamiferos presentes en las colecciones de referenda y exhibition del Museuo de Historia Natural de la Universidad del Cauca. Taller editorial Universidad del Cauca, Popayan. 96 pp: Choco : Asprilia-Aguilar, A. A., A. M. Jimenez-Ortega, H. Mantilla- Meluk. 2007. Analysis of the non-hematophagus bat species captured within of eradication ofDesmodus rotundus (E. Geoffrov, 1810) in the Colombian biogeographic Choco. Revista Institucional Universidad Tecnologica Del Choco. 26:42-48; Jimenez-Ortega, A. M., J Munoz-Arango, A. M. Gonzales, O. Y Secaida-Mena, N. Gil-Patino. 2002. Estudio de algunas comunidades de quiropteros en bosques pluvial tropical y bosque muy hiimedo tropi¬ cal del Choco (Colombia). Revista Institucional Universidad Tecnologica Del Choco. 15:20-25; Mantilla-Meluk H. and A. M. Jimenez-Ortega. 2006. Estado de conservation y algunas consideraciones biogeograficas sobre la quiropterofauna del Choco Biogeografico Colombiano. Revista Institucional Universidad Tecnologica del Choco 25:10-17; Moreno-Mosquera, E. A., Y. Roa-Garcia, A. M. Jimenez-Ortega. 2005. Murcielagos dispersores de semilla en bosques secundarios y areas cultivadas de la cuenca del rio Cabi, Choco- Colombia. Revista Institu¬ cional Universidad Tecnologica Del Choco. 23:45-50; Cundinamarca: Valdivieso, D. 1964. La fauna quioptera del departamento de Cundinamarca, Colombia. Revista de Biologia Tropical. 12( l): 19-45; Guainla: Angel, D. C. 34 Special Publications, Museum of Texas Tech University Appendix III (cont.) and A. Cadena. 1998. Caracterizacion ecologica preliminar de las riberas del rlo Inirida (Guainia), en el area de influencia de la comunidad de La Ceiba. 1998. Informe Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Instituto de Ciencias Naturales 6 pp; Meta. Munoz-Saba, Y., A. Cadena, and J. O. Rangel-Ch. 1997. Ecologla de los murcielagos antofilos del sector La Curia, Serrama La Macarena (Colombia). Revista de la Acedemia de Ciencas Naturales Flsicas y Exactas de Colombia. 21(81)473-478; Sanchez-Palomino, P., M. del P. Rivas-Pava, and A. Cadena. 1996. Diversidad biologica de una comunidad de quiropteros y su relacion con la estructura del habitat de bosque de galena, Serrania de la Macarena, Colombia. Caldasia 18:343-353; Santander. Otalora, A. 2003. Mamiferos del bosque de roble. Acta Biologica Colombiana. 8(2):57-71; Narino : Alberico, M. and J. Orejuela. 1983. Di¬ versidad especifica de dos comunidades de murcielagos en Narino, Colombia. Cespedesia 11:31-40; Cadena, A., R. P. Anderson, and P. Rivas-Pava. 1998. Colombian mammals from the Chocoan slopes of Narino. Occasional Papers Museum of Texas Tech University. 180:1-15; Ospina, O., and L. G. Gomez. 1999. Riqueza, abundancia relative y patrones de actividad temporal de la comunidad de murcielagos de la reserva natural La Planada, Narino, Colombia. Revista de la Academia de Ciencas Naturales Fisicas y Exactas de Colombia. Suplemento especial (23)159-169; Risaralda : A., Alfonso, and A. Cadena.. 1990. Composicion y estructuratrofica de la comunidad de murcielagos del parque regional Ucumari 361-373 pp; Caribbean region Hershkovitz, P. 1949. Mammals of northern Colombia, preliminary report no. 5 bats (Chiroptera). Proceedings of the United State National Museum. 99(3246):429-454; Tolitna : Bejarano-Bonilla, D. A., and M. H. Bernal-Bautista. 2007. Diversidad y distribucion de la fauna quiroptera en el departamento del Tolima. Caldasia 29(2):297-308; Biogeographic Choco : Muiioz- Saba, Y., and M. Alberico. 2004. Catalogo de mamiferos en el Choco Biogeografico. Pp. 571-597 in Colombia diversidad biotica IV; El Choco biogeografico, Costa Pacifica (J. O. Rangel Ed.). Universidad Nacional de Co¬ lombia, Bogota, Colombia. Mantilla-Meluk et al.—Phyllostomid Bats of Colombia 35 Appendix IV Presence matrix of Colombian phyllostomid species by region used to perform the hierarchical cluster analysis of bat composition similarity among Colombian natural regions. Species Lampronycteris brachyotis Micronycteris hirsuta Micronycteris megalotis Micronycteris microtis Micronycteris minuta Micronycteris schmidtorum Desmodus rotundas Diaemus youngi Diphylla eccwdata Lonchorrhina aurita Lonchorrhma marinkeUei Lonchorrhina orinocensis Macrophyllum macrophy/lum Trachops cirrhosus Lophostoma brasiliense Lophostoma carrikeri Lophostoma silvicolum Mimon bennettii Minion cozumelae Mimon cremdatum PhyJloderma stenops Phyllostomus discolor Phyllostomus elogatus Phyllostomus hastatus Phyllostomus latifolius Tonatia saurophila Chrotopterus auritus Vampyrum spectrum Anoura aequatoris Anoura cadenai Anoura caudifer Anoura cultrata Anoura fistulata Anoura geoffroyi Anoura latidens Anoura luismanueli Choeroniscus godmani Choeroniscus minor Ama 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Natural Region And Car Ori 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Pac T" 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 36 Special Publications, Museum of Texas Tech University Species Choeroniscus periosus Lichonycteris degener Lichonycteris obscura Scleronyctens egci Glossophaga commissarisi Glossophaga longirostris Glossophaga soricina Leptonycteris curasoae Lionycteris spurrelli Lonchophylla cadenai Lonchophy/la chocoana Lonchophylla concava Lonchophylla fornicata Lonchophylla handleyi Lonchophylla orienticollina Lonchophylla robusta Lonchophylla thomasi Carollia brevicandata Carollia castanea Carollia monohemandezi Carollia perspicillata Rhinophylla alethina Rhinophylla fischerae Rhinophylla pumilio Glyphony cter is sylvestris Neonycteris pusilla Trinycteris nicefori Stnrnira aratathomasi Sturnira bidens Stnrnira bogotensis Sturnira erythromus Sturnira koopmanhilli Sturnira lilium Sturnira luisi Sturnira magna Sturnira mistratensis Sturnira oporaphilum Sturnira tildae Chiroderma salvini Chiroderma trinitatum Chiroderma villosum Appendix IV (cont.) Ama 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 Natural Region And Car 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 Ori 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pac 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 Mantilla-Meluk et al.—Phyllostomid Bats of Colombia 37 Appendix IV (cont.) Species Natural Region Ama And Car Ori Pac Platyrrhinus albericoi 0 1 1 0 0 Platyrrhinus aquilus 0 1 1 0 0 Platyrrhimis brachycephalus 1 0 0 0 0 Platyrrhinus chocoensis 0 0 0 0 1 Platyrrhinus dorsalis 1 1 1 1 1 Platyrrhinus helleri 1 1 1 1 1 Platyrrhinus incarum 1 0 0 0 0 Platyrrhinus infuscus 1 0 0 0 0 Platyrrhinus ismaeli 0 1 0 0 0 Platyrrhinus nigellus 0 1 1 0 0 Platyrrhinus umbratus 0 1 1 0 0 Platyrrhinus vittatus 1 1 1 1 1 Platyrrhinus sp. nov. 0 0 0 0 1 Uroderma bitobatum 1 1 1 1 1 Uroderma magnirostrum 1 1 1 1 1 Vampyressa melissa 1 1 0 0 0 Vampyressa thy one 1 1 1 1 1 Vampyriscus bidens 1 1 0 0 0 Vampyriscus brocki 1 0 0 0 0 Vampyriscus nymphaea 0 0 0 0 1 Vampyrodes caraccioli 1 1 1 1 1 Enchistenes hartii 1 1 1 1 1 Mesophylla macconnelli 1 1 1 1 1 Artibeus ampins 0 1 1 0 0 Artibeus concolor 1 1 0 0 0 Artibeus jamaicensis 0 0 1 1 1 Artibeus lituratus 1 1 1 1 1 Artibeus obscurus 1 1 0 0 0 Artibeus planirostris 1 1 1 0 0 Dermanura anderseni 1 0 0 0 0 Dermanura bogotensis 0 1 0 0 0 Dermanura glauca 1 1 1 1 1 Dermanura gnoma 1 0 0 0 0 Dermanura phaeotis 0 1 1 0 1 Dermanura rava 0 1 0 0 1 Dermanura tolteca 0 1 0 0 1 Dermanura watsoni 0 1 0 0 1 Ametnda centurio 1 0 0 0 0 Sphaeronycteris toxophyllum 1 1 1 0 0