f

'
I,
A,

b
LJ
b
i

we
yeaa Geo
Avante

Voc beys
sake)
NEV Ai ati

ute)

nee

USES We Va
2% Veoh wants ale
1Tyee gy

AY

yk PDAS he

Mybingacy PaeNa

,

Ny) es
ean eh Te eh air ee hh)

+
ie

hey,
Gta

Kh Au

i
Rie a
She nS

WTR)

Ht nee tae
SAFI AS eh APB Rs AS be Ray
APR ree BCD The esa

A

we highs Timed Re
Sante
Seay

the
weep
hk

PET an By

iia

ine hy

; ais!
Bia

71 64

bates

eee

i i + iA ’
isa ilies SVRAI coon
4

rs due hae g heb } .

$4.
Ay

dere

My

¥
thet
iat

rey

Bae
ee

Utes bea: be
Merge table re

ie a
‘

tees
er

ag
tie ff

oO 4
“e *
3 ti; Penge

Dhatiiaestay
eae

eee

te
*

ste!
:

ie if
é tai got

Pan * ‘
SYA

Bette

3

at

iB

er etek tF
easy

-
degent
ret

Prats
ta
Ah:
wwdes iets i
ai tureaies
Hf ft bie

fe
ge ee et
Ayia

MUS. CGMP. ZOO;
LIBRARY =

“ POSTILLA
PEABODY MUSEUM
| YALE UNIVERSITY

NUMBER 167 20 MAY 1975

7g

A PACIFIC TABULATE SPONGE, LIVING
REPRESENTATIVE OF A NEW ORDER OF
SCLEROSPONGES

WILLARD D. HARTMAN

THOMAS F. GOREAU

POSTILLA

Published by the Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University

Postilla includes results of original research on systematic. evolution-
ary. morphological. and ecological biology, including paleontology.
Syntheses and other theoretical papers based on research are also
welcomed. Postilla is intended primarily for papers by the staff of
the Peabody Museum or on research using material in this Museum.

Editor: Zelda Edelson

Postilla is published at frequent but irregular intervals. Manuscripts,
orders for publications, and all correspondence concerning publications
should be directed to:

Publications Office
Peabody Museum of Natural History
New Haven, Conn. 06520, USA

Lists of the publications of the Museum are available from the above
office. These include Postilla, Bulletin, Discovery, and special publica-
tions. Postilla and the Bulletin are available in exchange for relevant
publications of other scientific institutions anywhere in the world.

Inquiries regarding back numbers of the discontinued journal, Bulletin
of the Bingham Oceanographic Collection, should be directed to:

Kraus Reprint Co.
Route 100
Millwood. New York 10546

A PACIFIC TABULATE SPONGE,
LIVING REPRESENTATIVE OF A NEW ORDER OF SCLEROSPONGES

WILLARD D. HARTMAN

Department of Biology and Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale Univer-
sity, New Haven, Connecticut 06520

THOMAS F. GOREAU'

Discovery Bay Marine Laboratory, University of the West Indies and State
University of New York at Stony Brook, New York 11790

Received 7 April 1975

ABSTRACT

A new sclerosponge, Acanthochaetetes wellsi, with a calcitic skeleton made
up of contiguous vertical tabulate calicles ornamented within by vertical rows
or irregular clumps of spines is described from cryptic habitats on reefs in the
western Pacific region. A lamellar microstructure characterizes the calicle
walls and spines. Increase in number of calicles occurs as intramural offsets.
An epitheca with growth lines surrounds the entire sponge.

Living tissue is restricted to the space in the calicles above the outermost
tabulae and a thin layer lying above the calcareous skeleton. Siliceous
spicules of two kinds, tylostyles and modified spirasters, are distributed in the
living tissue but are not incorporated into the calcitic skeleton. Star-shaped
groups of exhalant canals converge upon central oscules on the sponge sur-
face and leave astrorhizal patterns impressed into the calcareous skeleton
below.

A new order, the Tabulospongida, of the class Sclerospongiae is pro-
posed to receive the new Pacific species together with its Jurassic and
Cretaceous forebears. Despite suggestive similarities between acantho-
chaetetids and favositids, a phylogenetic relationship between these two
groups is considered unlikely on the basis of present evidence.

POSTILEA 167: 21 p. 20° MAY 1975

'Thomas F. Goreau, who was Professor of Marine Sciences at the University of the
West Indies, Mona, Kingston, Jamaica, Professor of Biology at the State University of
New York at Stony Brook and Director of the Discovery Bay Marine Laboratory,
Discovery Bay, Jamaica, died unexpectedly in New York on 22 April 1970. This paper,
based largely on specimens collected by Professor Goreau and enriched by his observa-
tions of the organism in life, was prepared by the first-named author.

2 | POSTILLA 167

INTRODUCTION

When we proposed transferring the order Chaetetida from the Phylum
Cnidaria to the Phylum Porifera (Hartman and Goreau, 1972) we noted that
species assigned to the family Acanthochaetetidae exhibit some basic differ-
ences from the remaining families of the order. We excluded the acan-
thochaetetids from the order Chaetetida and mentioned the similarity of a
Recent tabulate sponge (Hartman and Goreau, 1970b) to them. It is the pur-
pose of this paper to name and describe more fully the living acanthochaetetid
and to explore its relationships within the Class Sclerospongiae.

To our knowledge, this sponge was first collected by Professor John W.
Wells of Cornell University as a beach cast specimen on Rongerik Atoll,
Marshall Islands, in 1947. Living populations were discovered in 1968 by Mr.
Richard H. Randall and Dr. R. H. Chesher during explorations of underwater
caves on the reefs of Guam. Their specimens came to the attention of one of
us (T. F. G.) who undertook further studies of it on the reefs of both Guam
and Saipan. The species is now known to have a wide distribution in. the
western Pacific region where it occupies cryptic reef habitats comparable to
those populated by ceratoporellids in the Caribbean area (Hartman and
Goreau, 1970a).

METHODS

Specimens were collected by SCUBA diving and were fixed in neutral forma-
lin as soon as possible after being brought to the surface. After a few days the
sponges were transferred to 75% ethyl alcohol for long term storage. Tissue-
free calcareous skeleton preparations were obtained by treatment with 5.25%
sodium hypochlorite solution (commercial bleach). Scanning electron micro-
scope studies were undertaken with gold-coated specimens on one of the
following instruments: JEOL JSM-U3 and ETEC Autoscan U-1. Material for
histological studies was formalin fixed, decalcified in 2% formic acid, and
stained in Heidenhain’s iron hematoxylin and Alcian blue.

DESCRIPTION
Acanthochaetetes wellsi sp. nov.

DIAGNOSIS. Basal skeleton calcitic and massive, formed of contiguous, verti-
cal tabulate tubes or calicles, adjacent ones of which share common walls.
Walls of calicles provided with spines arranged in vertical rows or clumped
irregularly. Microstructure of calicle walls and spines composed of stacked
lamellae. Astrorhizoid patterns impressed in the surface of the calcareous
skeleton mark the position of the exhalant canal systems converging upon

PACIFIC TABULATE SPONGE 3

oscules. A well developed epitheca provided with concentric growth lines
covers the lower surface of the sponge. Living tissue confined to spaces 1.2 to
2.0 mm deep, external to the outermost tabula of each calicle. Siliceous
spicules of two types: 1) tylostyles with rounded distal ends and 2) modified
spirasters, neither type incorporated into the calcareous skeleton.

THE CALCAREOUS SKELETON. The basal skeleton of the sponge is composed of
calcite and is formed (Fig. 1) of contiguous, vertical tabulate calicles. The
calicles are elliptical, pentagonal or hexagonal in surface outline and vary in
internal diameter from 315 by 300 um to 615 by 395 wm. The width of the
calicle walls usually varies from 65 to 75 wm but may reach up to 140 um.
The edges of the calicles are crenulate (Fig. 5), each crenation corresponding
to the upwardly directed undulations of the lamellar crystalline units of calcite
that make up the calicular walls. A basally directed ridge continues from each
crenation; successive ridges are separated by furrows (Fig. 6); thus cross
sections through the calicles at any level have a scalloped appearance. Low,
rounded knobs often arise from the ridges and ornament the walls of the
calicles.

Spines are formed of successive lamellae of calcite peaked axially. The
spines (Fig. 6), although horizontal in overall orientation, are actually gently
arched, curving first upward and then downward and sometimes ending in
short horizontal tips. Spines vary in length from 30 to 180 «wm and in width at
base from 30 to 50 um.

Tabulae (Figs. 7, 12) are slightly convex, horizontal or slightly concave
and are formed of lamellar calcite. Sometimes a concave and a convex tabula
form in close juxtaposition and fuse to form a single thick tabula. The tabulae
are irregularly spaced and do not necessarily occur at the same level in
adjacent calicles although this is not infrequently so over limited regions of
the skeleton. Often a series of closely spaced tabulae, ranging from 90 to 165
Mm apart over 9 or 10 intertabular spaces, will then give way to a series of
more widely spaced ones, ranging from 200 to 500 wm apart. Even more
closely spaced series range from 50 to 120 um apart. The thickness of tabulae
is also highly variable, ranging from 20 to 135 wm, the thinner ones occurring
in closely spaced series and the thicker ones in more distantly spaced series.

Scanning electron micrographs (Fig. 14) reveal that the surface of the in-
terior of the calicles is made up of irregularly arranged needlelike crystalline
units of calcite that must compose the successive lamellae seen at lower
magnifications under the light microscope.

The entire lower surface of the sponge is covered with a thin epitheca
(Figs. 2, 8) that is marked with fine concentric growth lines. At times the
sponge grows up to a height that is three or more times the diameter of the
living surface, and a stalked condition results. At other times the living sur-
face spreads out rapidly, and its diameter is many times the height of the
sponge. It is characteristic of this sponge to die back at unknown intervals of
time, perhaps erratically, and to put forth new groups of calicles at a level
above the previous living surface. As a result three or more “‘generations”’ of
dead, flattened masses of skeleton may overlie one another, the topmost alive

4 POSTILLA 167

and often irregular in outline and sometimes subdivided into numerous small
‘‘islands’’ of living tissue. The largest specimen measured has greatest
diameters of 33 by 26 cm but the largest continuous living portion covers an
irregular area roughly 18 by 18 cm in greatest diameters. Other specimens
remain small with diameters of <I cm to 2 or 3 cm; such individuals are
characteristic of populations living on the Great Barrier Reef, Australia.
SILICEOUS AND ORGANIC SKELETAL ELEMENTS. The siliceous megascleres are
thin tylostyles (Fig. 9A) with ellipsoidal heads and rounded distal ends. Di-
mensions, based on measurement of 25 spicules from a Guam specimen are:

Length: range, 201 to 336 wm; mean (with standard error), 286+7 um.

Width: range, 2.6 to 3.9 wm; mean (with SE), 3.4+0.1 ym.

Head Width: range, 6.2 to 8.5 wm; mean (with SE), 7.4+0.4 wm.
The tylostyles are localized, with heads directed toward the base of the
sponge, in the living tissue of the outer third of the calicles.

The siliceous microscleres (Fig. 9B-H) are variable in form but are basically
spirasters. In some a spiral axial rod, ornamented with branched spines that
follow a spiral course along the rod, is clearly apparent (Fig. 9F, G). In others
the spines are closely spaced, multibranched and robust and therefore tend to
obscure the axial rod (Fig. 9C). All intermediates in size and spination occur
between the extremes described (Fig. 9D, E). Our observations of a spicule
preparation indicated a range of greatest length by greatest width of 6 by
5 um to 28 by 20 wm. The microscleres are localized in the outer layer
of the living tissue (Fig. 13). The siliceous spicules of this sclerosponge are
not incorporated into the calcareous basal skeleton in a manner comparable
to that found in the ceratoporellids (Hartman, 1969).

Organic fibrils (probably proteinaceous) of two size ranges, 11 to 14 nm

and 5 to 6 nm, respectively, as revealed in transmission electron micro-
graphs, occur as a matrix for the calcitic skeleton and are also present
between cells of the living tissue.
LIVING TISSUES OF THE SPONGE. The living tissue of A. wellsi is cream to
yellowish cream in color at the surface; fractured specimens reveal that the
tissue in the calicles is bright yellow. It seems likely that the abundance of
microscleres in the surface layer of the sponge causes a lightening of the color
of that region.

Ostia open into the unit of sponge tissue enclosed in each calicle. Ostia are
located in the floor of shallow crescent-shaped or sinuous grooves (Fig. 4)
that usually lie very close to but above the calcareous walls of the calicles.
The chord length of these grooves varies from 200 to 260 wm and the width,
from 25 to 50 wm. The diameters of the opened ostia are unknown. These
observations are based on transverse histological sections and close-up
photographs of the living animal in situ.

Photographic evidence (Fig. 4) suggests that there is in most instances an
ostial groove for each calicle. Some calicles seem to lack grooves, however,
and it is probable that the inhalant channels of two or perhaps more calicles
can be supplied with sea water from the ostia of a single groove.

Each ostium opens into a vestibular cavity (Fig. 13) from which arises an

PACIFIC TABULATE SPONGE 5

inhalant channel that subdivides, with the branches opening into choanocyte
chambers. The choanocyte chambers (Fig. 13) are small, measuring from 21
by 18 um to 24 by 20 um in histological preparations. The chambers open into
narrow exhalant channels that fuse and increase in diameter as they make
their way out of the calicle to join similar channels from adjacent calicles. At
the surface of the sponge exhalant channels draining areas that vary from 20
to 50 mm? converge upon oscules, thus forming stellate patterns (Figs. 3, 4).
Exhalant channels from adjacent drainage systems characteristically fuse
(Hartman and Reiswig, 1973). The diameters of the exhalant channels where
they join the oscules vary from 220 to 290 wm. Radii of the exhalant systems
from the points of fusion with neighboring systems to the central oscules vary
from 4.0 to 1.8 mm. One to three oscules drain each exhalant system; oscule
diameter varies from 100 to 130 wm. Measurements of the exhalant system
are based on close-up photographs of living animals in situ.

As is true among the ceratoporellids (Hartman, 1969; Hartman and Goreau,
1970a) the positions of the exhalant channels that run in the thin surface layer
of sponge tissue above the calcitic calicles are impressed into the calcareous
skeleton to a greater or lesser extent (Fig. 1) as a result of the inhibition of
upward growth of calcite beneath the channels that carry flowing water.
There remain, therefore, more or less clearly marked astrorhizalike patterns
on the surface of the skeleton. The oscule or oscules that open in the center
of exhalant systems often lie on an elevated mound or mamelon that varies
from 5 mm to less than | mm in height in different specimens. Mamelons are
absent in some specimens and are most pronounced in specimens from the
Palau populations.

SYMBIONTS. Neither unicellular algal nor bacterial symbionts have been ob-
served in the cells or tissues of this sponge. An unidentified zoanthidean is
not infrequently associated with A. wellsi.

RANGE AND HABITAT. Widely distributed in the western Pacific region. Popu-
lations of the sponge are known from the Marianas Islands (Guam, 3 to 30 m;
Saipan, 1 to 12 m), Caroline Islands (Palaus, 10 to 30 m), Marshall Islands
(Rongerik and Eniwetok atolls, 2 to 12 m), Fiji Islands (25 to 30 m), Australia
(Great Barrier Reef, 6 to 10 m). A. wellsi lives in crevices and caves and on
the lower surfaces of overhangs on reefs. The known overall depth range of 1
to 30 m is less at both extremes than the depth range of Caribbean sclero-
sponges (Lang, Hartman and Land, 1975).

HOLOTYPE. Yale Peabody Museum No. 9077. Cave, Anae Island, Guam. 7.5
to 9 m. Collected by T. F. Goreau, 19 July 1969.

REPOSITORIES OF PARATYPICAL MATERIAL. National Museum of Natural His-
tory, Washington, D. C.; British Museum (Natural History), London;
Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris; Peabody Museum of Natural
History, Yale University.

REMARKS. The species is named in honor of Professor John W. Wells, Cornell
University, who first collected a skeleton of the sponge on a beach on
Rongerik Atoll, Marshall Islands, in 1947. He brought the specimen to our
attention subsequent to the rediscovery of Ceratoporella in Jamaica.

6 POSTILLA 167
RELATIONSHIPS

GENERIC AFFINITY. The calcareous skeleton of the Recent sponge described
here is directly comparable to that of the type-species of the genus
Acanthochaetetes Fischer (1970), known from Jurassic and Cretaceous strata.
Fischer’s figure (1970, fig. 32) of the microstructure of A. seunesi Fischer can
serve as well as an illustration of the microstructure of A. wellsi. Fur-
thermore, figures of the astrorhizal patterns on the surface of the Cretaceous
species A. ramulosus (Michelin) are in every way similar to the stellate pat-
terns on A. wellsi described herein (compare Cuif et al., 1973, especially fig.
5, with fig. | herein). The discussion of the astrorhizae of the Cretaceous
species of Acanthochaetetes presented by these authors can now be altered in
the light of studies of the Recent species. Cuif et al. note two types of
astrorhizal patterns in A. ramulosus. That pictured in their figure 5 is identical
to that of the Recent forms. The second type (their figure 4), in which the
center is composed of a group of enlarged vertical(?) tubes, is unlike anything
to be observed in the living species. It is suggested that the second pattern
either represents another species or has resulted from diagenetic processes. A
further observation of Cuif and his coauthors (1973) about the astrorhizae of
Acanthochaetetes is thrown in doubt by studies of the Recent species. This is
that the astrorhizae of A. ramulosus and A. seunesi are somehow formed of
tubes, identical in structure to the tissue-bearing calicles, that ascend from
the depths of the skeleton and converge at the surface. It is very douk tful that
these configurations (see Cuif et al., fig. 6) have anything to do with the
astrorhizal patterns at the surface; it is much more likely that the figure
records several developmental abnormalities that occurred during the up-
growth of the calcareous skeleton. It should be recalled that the astrorhizal
patterns in A. wellsi result from local inhibition of upgrowth of the calcareous
calicles just below the exhalant channels that are converging upon an oscule
or oscules located in the center of the system. The channel linings are, of
course, composed entirely of living tissue and would not be preserved in
fossilized specimens. If it is also recalled that all the living tissue of the
sponge lies above the last tabulae to be deposited in the calicles, it is realized
that there is no reason for this sponge to communicate with deeper regions of
the skeleton, which is dead below a depth of no more than 2 mm from the
surface.

The arrangement of the calicular spines, the occurrence of both thin and
thickened tabulae at irregular intervals, and the formation of intramural off-
sets in asexual reproduction are additional characters that point to acan-
thochaetetid affinities for the Recent sponge under discussion.

COMPARISON WITH OTHER SPECIES. Assignment of the Recent species wellsi
to the genus Acanthochaetetes is based on the close homology between the
macroscopic and microscopic features of the calcareous skeleton. Is it war-
ranted to set up a new species for the Recent form or is this form identical
to one of the Mesozoic species? Working with characters of the calcareous
skeleton for A. wellsi, it can be seen in Table 1 that the Recent species over-

PACIFIC TABULATE SPONGE v

laps A. ramulosus in two characters and A. seunesi in a third while it differs
from both fossil forms in a fourth character. Thus it may be concluded that
wellsi is best considered a distinct species belonging to the genus Acantho-
chaetetes, the age of which is now known to extend from Jurassic to Re-
cent times.

TABLE |. Characteristics of calcareous skeleton of Acanthochaetetes species.

A. seunesi* A. ramulosus* A. wellsi
Diameter of calicles 0.60-1.20 mm 0.35-0.70 mm _ ~_—0..35-0.55 mm
(center to center)
Distance between ? 8-12 mm 4-14 mm
astrorhizal centers
Wall thickness 0.05S—0.16 mm 0.45-1.20 mm __—0..07-0.14 mm
Spacing of tabulae 0.20-2.00 mm _ ~=_—0..20-2.00 mm__——0..05-0.50 mm

* Data from Fischer, 1970.

RELATIONSHIP OF ACANTHOCHAETETIDS TO OTHER SCLEROSPONGES. Fischer
(1970) placed his new genus Acanthochaetetes in the new family Acan-
thochaetetidae within the order Chaetetida. The members of this family have
a number of characters that set them apart from the Chaetetida and all other
known sclerosponges, however. The chief distinction is the calcitic nature
and lamellar microstructure of the calcareous skeleton as opposed to the
aragonitic composition and trabecular microstructure of all other known
sclerosponges. A second distinction is the presence of spinose processes on
the walls of the calicles, and a third is the presence of siliceous spicules in the
form of smooth tylostyles and modified spirasters, spicule types that are quite
different from those found in the ceratoporellids. These distinctive characters
lead us to propose the new order TABULOSPONGIDA for the members of
the family Acanthochaetetidae.

DIAGNOSIS OF THE NEW ORDER. Sclerosponges with a calcitic basal skeleton
having a lamellar microstructure. Walls of calicles may be provided with
spines. Tabulae may be secondarily thickened and of irregular arrangement.
Asexual reproduction by intramural budding. Living tissue of Recent species
secretes siliceous spicules in the form of tylostyles and modified spirasters.
Astrorhizal patterns impressed into the surface of the calcareous skeleton.
Known range: Jurassic to Recent.

TABULOSPONGIDA AND FAVOSITIDA COMPARED. The Tabulospongida share
certain morphological features with members of the Favositida, an order of
animals that are generally regarded as being tabulate corals. The similarities

8 POSTILLA 167

are sufficiently striking to lead us to raise the question of whether favositids
were in fact sponges instead of cnidarians. The characters shared by species
of the two orders are: the presence of spines on the walls of the calicles; the
presence of tabulae and epithecae; and asexual reproduction by means of
budding at the edge of the entire skeletal complex or in walls between calicles
when space becomes available as the skeletal surface grows upward. Con-
cerning the first character, the spines of favositids, when present, may occur
in vertical rows usually numbering 6 to 12 according to the species (Hill and
Stumm, 1956) or, as is true more frequently, the spines are irregularly ar-
ranged (Schouppé and Oekentorp, 1974). The spines of acanthochaetetid
sponges may be lined up in vertical rows (Fig. 6) or may occur in irregular
configurations and are highly variable in number per calicle even within a
single sponge skeleton. The presence of tabulae and epithecae (thecae sur-
rounding the entire skeleton) in both groups is not noteworthy in itself since
such structures are of wide occurrence among sclerosponges, cnidarians and
bryozoans. Further comparative studies of the microstructure of these ele-
ments would be of interest, however. Schouppé and Oekentorp (1974) regard
the outer wall of the favositid corallum (called “‘holotheca’’ by them and
‘‘epitheca’’ by us) as the sum of the free parts of the epithecal layer of each
calicle where the peripheral calicles border the outer surface of the corallum.
There is no evidence of an epithecal layer surrounding each calicle in
Acanthochaetetes where the microstructure of the calicular wall and epitheca
differ markedly.

The methods of budding in acanthochaetetids resemble types of asexual
increase in many species of Favosites. Holbrook and Bambach (1970), for
example, described budding in F. helderbergiae Hall as occurring at the edges
of the skeletal mass or, more usually, in junctions between calicles. Swann
(1947), however, studying F. alpenensis Winchell, described peripheral bud-
ding in which a new wall is formed to cut off a corner of an existing calicle. In
Striatopora flexuosa Hall, Oliver (1966) described a close relationship be-
tween each newly budded corallite and its parent. Buds formed in only two
positions, at the branch axis and near the boundary between an inner, thin-
walled and an outer, thick-walled zone in this dimorphic species. This mode
of budding is quite unlike that of acanthochaetetid sponges as well as of many
species of Favosites where buds form in walls between calicles but are not
obviously given off by a particular parent calicle.

Some important differences between favositids and tabulospongids are ap-
parent, the most striking being the occurrence of mural pores aligned in
vertical rows in the calicular walls of favositids and the absence of directly
comparable structures in acanthochaetetids. Submicroscopic pores do occur
in the walls of the calicles (Fig. 14) of the latter group, but they are not
arranged with regularity and measure only 2 to 3 wm in diameter compared to
the pores of a form like Favosites gothlandicus Lamarck where pore diameter
is 200 to 300 «wm (Oekentorp and Sorauf, 1970).

The nature of the primary microstructure of the calicular walls and spines
of favositids is disputed. Lafuste (1962) described a microlamellar microstruc-

PACIFIC TABULATE SPONGE 9

ture in the walls of Favosites gothlandicus Lamarck (type-species of the
genus) and considered this structure to be primary. He proposed that only
species with a lamellar microstructure (mostly of Silurian age) should be
retained in the genus Favosites, while those species with a fibrous microstruc-
ture (especially characteristic of the Devonian) should be transferred to
another genus as yet unnamed. The fact that the spines of F. gothlandicus
have a fibrous microstructure suggested to Schouppé and Oekentorp (1974),
however, that the lamellar nature of the calicular walls is a result of post-
mortem recrystallization while the microstructure of the spines has remained
unchanged. Indeed, these latter authors, who have presented an excellent
summary of the factual and theoretical results of previous workers on the
nature of the wall structure of favositids, have concluded that lamellar types
of microstructure always result from secondary recrystallization, thus agree-
ing with the views of Kato (1968). Schouppé and Oekentorp maintain that the
primary microstructure of the walls of favositid calicles was identical to that
of Recent scleractinian corals, that is, either trabecular or fibrolamellar. They
argue that the latter crystal orientation is easily transformed into a lamellar
formation through diagenetic processes. If this is true, then the original min-
eral that made up the skeleton of favositids was most probably aragonite (see
Sorauf, 1971, for a discussion of this question), and both the primary micro-
structure and mineral form of the calcareous skeletons of favositids and acan-
thochaetetids are markedly different.

However, the difficult question of the effect of diagenesis on calcareous
minerals has yet to be settled in full. An important aspect of the discovery of
an organism like A. wellsi, with a nonspicular, wavy lamellar, calcitic skele-
ton is that it will allow an experimental approach to the problem of the
diagenetic alteration of the form and microstructure of this mineral. Is it
possible that a primary lamellar microstructure can transform secondarily into
a fibrolamellar or fibronormal one? It is of interest to note that Richter (1972),
studying carbonate inclusions within quartz crystals where it is believed that
the calcium carbonate escaped diagenetic alteration, concluded that the skele-
tons of Devonian Tabulata (genera are regrettably unspecified) had an original
Mg-calcite composition.

Two additional arguments may be brought to bear upon the question of
whether the favositids have affinities to the Porifera. First, it is of significance
to note that in two (Ceratoporella and Acanthochaetetes) of the three Recent
genera of sclerosponges in which the surface of the basal calcareous skeleton
is organized into calicular units, the surface area and volume of the calicles
have overlapping values (Table 2). Since in both of these examples the tissue
unit enclosed in each calicle is an amount supplied by a single ostium, one
might expect on physiological grounds that there would be an optimal and
maximal number of choanocyte chambers (and hence of tissue volume) that
can be supplied by a single inhalant pore. The fact that these two examples
belong to quite different evolutionary lines separable at the ordinal level tends
to confirm the significance of the size limitations on calicle form in sclero-
sponges. Of further interest is the fact that both of these forms bear as-

10 POSTILLA 167

TABLE 2. Dimensions of calicles of Recent sclerosponges.

Diameter Depth of Volume of
of opening calicles ' calicles
Ceratoporella 0.2-0.5 mm 1.0-1.2 mm 0.03-0.24 mm?*
nicholsoni
Acanthochaetetes 0.3-0.6 mm 1.2-2.0 mm 0.09-0.57 mm?
wellsi
Merlia 0.120.1S mm _ 0.14-0.16 mm _— 0.0015—0.0028 mm?
normani (to first tabula)

trorhizal depressions on the surface of the skeleton. These patterns exist
because the tissue above the skeleton is sufficiently thin that exhalant canals
when distended with water not only rise above the general surface of the
sponge as varicosities but also touch the tops of the skeletal cups and inhibit
their growth locally.

Merlia normani Kirkpatrick is exceptional among those living sponges that
have both siliceous spicules and a calcareous basal skeleton in having irregu-
larly spaced ostia that do not correspond in number or placement to the
regularly arranged calicles beneath (Kirkpatrick, 1911). Further, the exhalant
canals are of smal] diameter, and the flow of water through them is cushioned
by the tissue lying above the calcareous skeleton so that the calicles are not
inhibited as they grow upward.

Thus, although the examples of Ceratoporella and Acanthochaetetes would
lead us to expect that related fossil sponges must have calicle sizes of a
characteristic and restricted area as well as astrorhizal impressions on the
skeletal surface, Merlia provides us with an example of a sclerosponge in
which the calicles are freed from size constraints associated with the distribu-
tion of ostia and in which the surface of the skeleton fails to manifest as-
trorhizal patterns. We have no model among living sclerosponges for those
favositid skeletons with large calicles of | mm or more in diameter, however.
But the structure of Merlia suggests that there is no a priori reason why an
organism with such an arrangement of calicles could not have been a sponge.
Studies of both Merlia and Acanthochaetetes indicate that the absence of
siliceous spicules (or their pseudomorphs) embedded in the calcareous skele-
ton does not gainsay poriferan affinities for fossils with otherwise suggestive
characteristics. Thus the discovery of a Recent species of Acanthochaetetes
and proof of its poriferan nature further complicate the problem of differen-
tiating between sponges and cnidarians in the fossil record.

When the evidence for and against a phylogenetic relationship between the
acanthochaetetid sponges and favositids is weighed in the balance, it must be

PACIFIC TABULATE SPONGE 11

concluded at present that a phylogenetic affinity between sponges and
favositids is unlikely. The suggestive superficial resemblances and the striking
detailed similarities in spine structure and mode of budding must be set
against the differences in wall microstructure, great variation in calicle size
among favositids and the absence of astrorhizal figures on the surface (the last
two points are not strong ones, however), and the strong likelihood of an
evolutionary series connecting the favositids with other tabulate cnidarians
(forms with extensive coenostea or with fasciculate or branching modes of
skeletal growth are not suspected of poriferan affinities) and rugosan corals
(see, e.g., Flower, 1961).

What is more likely than that all favositids were sponges is that most were
cnidarians, but a few now included in the group were in reality sponges with
some characteristics convergent upon those of favositids. Perhaps most of
these will be readily recognized. For example, the Silurian genus Nodulipora
Lindstrom (1896) has astrorhizalike patterns on the surface. Tesakov (1960)
regards this genus as a synonym of Desmidopora Nicholson and places it
among the chaetetids. In view of the trabecular microstructure, Tesakov’s
phylogenetic conclusion may be correct, although the synonymy with
Desmidopora is less clear. Nodulipora is clearly not a favositid, however, as
Lindstrom (1896) had at first speculated, and it differs from other Paleozoic
chaetetids in the presence of distinct astrorhizalike configurations at the sur-
face. The genus seems to provide evidence for the existence of additional
subgroups of sclerosponges in the Paleozoic that could readily be confused
with tabulate cnidarians.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are indebted to R. S. Boardman, G. E. Hutchinson, W. A. Oliver, Jr., H.
M. Reiswig, J. E. Sorauf, and J. W. Wells for stimulating discussions about
the contents of this paper at various times. We are grateful to K. E. Chave
and L. S. Land for determining the calcitic nature of the skeleton of this
sponge by X-ray analysis. H. M. Reiswig was a field colleague of one of us
(W. D. H.) in the Marianas Islands in 1971 and helped immeasurably in the
study of this and other sponges. The director and staff of the Marine
Laboratory, University of Guam, offered us their generous hospitality during
our sojourn there. J.-C. Fischer of the Muséum National d’ Histoire Naturelle,
Paris; Thor @rvig of the Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm;
and F. J. Collier of the National Museum of Natural History, Washington,
D. C., kindly made available for study specimens under their care.

We also thank the many persons who have provided us with specimens of
the sponge described herein. K. R. H. Read and Douglas Faulkner provided
us with material from the Palau Islands; S. Smith and R. A. Kinzie III pro-
vided us with records from Eniwetok Atoll; J. C. Lang and L. S. Land made
available to us for study specimens collected at the Fijis and on the Great
Barrier Reef, Australia.

V2 POSTILLA 167

The scanning electron micrographs were prepared with the skilled collab-
oration of V. Peters and A. S. Pooley. D. Holbrook and W. Phelps helped in
technical and photographic work, and C. Dean typed the manuscript. To all
these persons we express our gratitude.

The firstnamed author owes a special debt of gratitude to Mrs. Nora I.
Goreau who generously made available to him for study.the collections,
photographs, and notes assembled by her husband before his untimely death.

This work was supported in part by a grant from the National Geographic
Society.

LITERATURE CITED

Cuif, J.-P:, Pierre Feuillée, J.-C. Fischer and Andrée Pascal) 19733Presence
d’astrorhizes chez les Chaetetida mésozoiques. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 277:
2473-2476.

Fischer. J.-C. 1970. Révision et essai de classification des Chaetetida (Cnidaria)
post-paléozoiques. Ann. Paleontol. Invertébr. 56: 149-233.

Flower, R. H. 1961. Montoya and related colonial corals. Mem. Inst. Min. Technol.
New Mex. 7: 3-97, pl. 1-52.

Hartman, W. D. 1969. New genera and species of coralline sponges (Porifera) from
Jamaica. Postilla (Peabody Mus., Yale Univ.) 137: 1-39.

Hartman, W. D. and T. F. Goreau. 1970a. Jamaican coralline sponges: their morphol-
ogy, ecology and fossil relatives. Symp. Zool. Soc. London 25: 205-243.

1970b. A new Pacific sponge: homeomorph or descendant of the tabulate ‘‘cor-

als’?? Geol. Soc. Amer. Abstr. with Program 2 (7): 570.

1972. Ceratoporella (Porifera: Sclerospongiae) and the chaetetid ‘‘corals’’.
Trans. Conn. Acad. Arts Sci. 44: 133-148.

Hartman, W. D. and H. M. Reiswig. 1973. The individuality of sponges. Pages 567-584
in R. S. Boardman, A. H. Cheetham and W. A. Oliver, Jr. [eds.] Animal Colonies.
Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, Inc., Stroudsburg, Pa.

Hill, D. and E. C. Stumm. 1956. Tabulata. Pages F444-F477 in R. C. Moore [ed.]
Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part F. University of Kansas Press, Law-
rence.

Holbrook, S. J. and R. K. Bambach. 1970. Budding, growth and environmental re-
sponse in Favosites helderbergiae Hall (Tabulata). Geol. Soc. Amer. Abstr. with
Program 2 (7): 579.

Kato, M. 1968. Note on the fine skeletal structures in Scleractinia and in Tabulata. J.
Fac. Sci. Hokkaido Univ., Ser. 4, Geol. Miner. 14: 51-56.

Kirkpatrick, R. 1911. On Merlia normani, a sponge with a siliceous and calcareous
skeleton. Quart. J. Microsc. Sci. 56: 657-702.

Lafuste, Jean. 1962. Note préliminaire sur la microstructure de la muraille chez
Favosites Lamarck (Coelenterata, Tabulata). C. R. Soc. Géol. France 1962 (2):
105-106.

Lang, J. C., W. D. Hartman, and L. S. Land. 1975. Sclerosponges: primary framework
constructors on the Jamaican deep fore-reef. J. Mar. Res., in press.

Lindstrom, G. 1896. Beschreibung einiger Obersilurischer Korallen aus der Insel Got-
land. Bih. K. Sven. Vetenskapsakad. Handl. 21: 1-50, pl. 1-8.

Oekentorp, K. and J. E. Sorauf. 1970. Ueber Wandporen bei Favosites (Fav.) gothlan-
ae Lamarck, 1816 (Coelenterata, Tabulata). N. Jb. Geol. Palaont. Abh. 134:
283-298.

Oliver, W. A., Jr. 1966. Description of dimorphism in Striatopora flexuosa Hall.
Paleontology 9: 448-454, pl. 68-71.

PACIFIC TABULATE SPONGE 13

Richter, D. K. 1972. Authigenic quartz preserving skeletal material. Sedimentology 19:
211-218.

Schouppé, A. V. and K. Oekentorp. 1974. Morphogenese and Bau der Tabulata. Unter
besonderer Berucksichtigung der Favositida. Paleontographica 145: 79-194, pl. 9-18.

Sorauf, J. E. 1971. Microstructure in the exoskeleton of some Rugosa (Coelenterata). J.
Paleont. 45: 23-32, pl. 5-11.

Swann, D. H. 1947. The Favosites alpenensis lineage in the Middle Devonian Traverse
group of Michigan. Contrib. Mus. Paleontol. Univ. Mich. 6: 235-318, 17 pl.

Tesakov, Yu. I. 1960. O sistematicheskom polozhenii roda Desmidopora Nicholson.
Paleontol. Zhurn. 1960(4): 48-53. [In Russian. ]

14 POSTILLA 167

FIGURE LEGENDS

FIG. 1. View of upper surface of calcareous skeleton of Acanthochaetetes wellsi sp.
nov. showing astrorhizal patterns. Paratype, Yale Peabody Museum No. 9078. Scale =
1 cm.

FIG. 2. View of lower surface of same specimen showing epitheca, Scale = | cm.

FIG. 3. Surface view of living A. wellsi showing exhalant canal systems and ostia.
Photographed in situ by H. M. Reiswig in cave at Anae Island, Guam. Scale = 1 cm.

FIG. 4. Enlargement of portion of upper surface of A. wellsi showing patterns of exhal-
ant canals and open ostial grooves (numerous dark spots). Photographed in situ by H.
M. Reiswig in cave at Anae Island, Guam. Scale = 2.5 mm.

FIG. 5. Calicles of A. wellsi viewed from above. Two newly developing asexual buds
are marked by arrows. Scanning electron microscope. Scale = 0.2 mm.

FIG 6. Longitudinal fracture of basal skeleton of A. wellsi showing rows of spines in
calicles. SEM. Scale = 0.25 mm.

FIG. 7. Looking down on tabula at base of calicle. Cut surfaces of the calicular wall
may be seen around the periphery of photograph. A single spine projects from the wall.
SEM. Scale = 0.05 mm.

FIG. 8. Lateral view of A. wellsi showing epitheca. SEM. Scale = 0.2 mm.

FIG. 9. Siliceous spicules of A. wellsi. A) Tylostyles. B) Spirasters. Scale of A, B =
0.025 mm. C-H) Spirasters of varying form. Scale of C-H = 0.004 mm. SEM.

FIG. 10. Longitudinal thin-section of skeleton of A. ramulosus (Cretaceous, Le Mans,
France) showing microstructure of calicle walls, spines and tabulae. U. S. National
Museum No. 32196. Scale = 0.2 mm.

FIG. 11. Longitudinal thin-section of outer end of calicle of A. wellsi showing micro-
structure. Scale = 0.2 mm.

FIG. 12. Longitudinal thin-section of calicles of A. wellsi 5 mm below the surface,
showing calicle walls and tabulae. Note wavy lamellar microstructure. Scale = 0.2 mm.

FIG. 13. Longitudinal section of cellular tissue within a calicle of A. wellsi. A portion of
the photograph equivalent to 0.675 mm has been omitted at the arrows. c, choanocyte
chamber; h, inhalant canal; m, microsclere; s, aggregation of sperm; ta, decalcified
tabula; r, tylostyle; v, vestibule; w, decalcified wall of calicle showing fibers of matrix.
Scale = 0.1 mm.

FIG. 14. Crystalline units of internal surface of wall of a calicle of A. wellsi. Note pores
in wall. Scale = 0.001 mm.

FIG. 15. Nodulipora acuminata Lindstrom. Silurian of Gotland, Sweden. Swedish
Museum of Natural History No. Cn 1048. Scale = 1 cm.

ws?

SS

REVIEW

STYLE

FORM

TITLE

ABSTRACT

NOMENCLATURE
ILLUSTRATIONS

FOOTNOTES
TABLES

REFERENCES
AUTHOR’S COPIES

PROOF

COPYRIGHT

INFORMATION FOR AUTHORS

The Publications Committee of the Peabody Museum of Natural
History reviews and approves manuscripts for publication. Papers
will be published in approximately the order in which they are
accepted; delays may result if manuscript or illustrations are not in
proper form. To facilitate review, the original and one carbon or
xerox copy of the typescript and figures should be submitted. The
author should keep a copy.

Authors of biological papers should follow the CBE Style Manual
Third Edition (Amer. Inst. Biol. Sci.). Authors of paleontological
manuscripts may choose to follow the Suggestions to Authors of
the Reports of the U.S. Geological Survey, Fifth Edition (U.S.
Govt. Printing Office).

Maximum size is 80 printed pages including illustrations (= about
100 manuscript pages including illustrations). Manuscripts must be
typewritten, with wide margins, on one side of good quality 8% x 11”
paper. Double space everything. Do not underline anything except
genera and species. The editors reserve the right to adjust style and
form for conformity.

Should be precise and short. Title should include pertinent key
words which will facilitate computerized listings. Names of new
taxa are not to be given in the title.

The paper must begin with an abstract. Authors must submit com-
pleted BioAbstract forms; these can be obtained from the Postilla
editors in advance of submission of the manuscripts.

Follow the International Codes of Zoological and Botanical Nomen-
clature.

Must be planned for reduction to 4% x 7” (to allow for running
head and two-line caption). If illustration must go sideways on
page, reduction should be to 4 x 74". All illustrations should be
called ‘‘Figures’’ and numbered in arabic, with letters for parts
within one page. It is the author’s responsibility to see that illustra-
tions are properly lettered and mounted. Captions should be typed
double-spaced on a separate page.

Should not be used, with rare exceptions. If unavoidable, type
double-spaced on a separate page.

Should be numbered in arabic. Each must be typed on a separate
page. Horizontal rules should be drawn lightly in pencil; vertical
rules must not be used. Tables are expensive to set and correct;
cost may be lowered and errors prevented if author submits tables
typed with electric typewriter for photographic reproduction.

The style manuals mentioned above must be followed for form and for
abbreviations of periodicals. Double space.

Each author receives 50 free copies of his Postilla. Additional copies
may be ordered at cost by author when he returns galley proof.
All copies have covers.

Author receives galley proof and manuscript for checking printer’s
errors, but extensive revision cannot be made on the galley proof.
Corrected galley proof and manuscript must be returned to editors
within seven days.

Any issue of Postilla will be copyrighted by Peabody Museum of
Natural History only if its author specifically requests it.

; = Sieninieiaesee ee
4 Acme

Bookbinding Co., Inc.
300 Summer Street
* Boston, Mass. 02210

wit auny

4 066 305

fae nia nd gh
a al A
erm
oy

hs Ri
’ ¢
ete

by

vy rt
PASTA et

tN
BC eae)

+7
eee I,
beyctt

: H Goes AE eh WOE a US MGT
‘ . f ts i me tt SUB at ait ef br
Ph | URSA
Pugh

ASM ren OPN Bek S bak ; ete HAN
an ae aut ROL hie ALY i ‘ i chr
+ ae CURL Ea yesh Pa S ‘ A a ts
es ee bi i "| i BASS : f t : Way gy
# is ja > f 7 es. be) j ry 4
Acheter i
¢ d + POcar eh
WASHES ATG cot , 5 H a SU ed
in é sty ath GH Re Coes tet Wy ro VASE CU GG Lek
SR Ay , ; ee ; :
see i 7

¥ Vi
5 J * ¥ x heh «i
i AK teri
‘i : AN i 3 eS Rar
ANE AAS a dat N AN
. \ nga Q

4
hay AY W 4,
3 ‘ . s hash La OSaee bt Be a jlegih:s GRE KY AU eB Valle edt
Ry ct, he A Aes 1S tA i A rar ie aor i. MUA bie Wer * 4, ViQ east gy <¢ < YN UBS at
a M az eo erst ae - iN “8 eer 7 y
Ey eS a re rie \ cs t ea ‘ 2 bres ee
Eras 7 4 : ae

Yay é ‘
erik Aik Picts RPS Ok A TAS At Bway:
Wey Lieu eyes fy

aa
ii sya Wa

a
’ CES ed | Mere i
a :
Lied Sale Oe Oat da a od \ MC ORE EG ge iY
POV (Gi Verba hi 4
Pres ‘

SA,
fh hast
it 4