eter eee sate See al — — ~~ ee Te wrt — Oy tee eee een ne ad ae cane ta eee INS HARVARD UNIVERSITY el LIBRARY OF THE Museum of Comparative Zoology Las YALE PEABODY MUSEUM oF Natura History Number 68 September 24, 1962 New Haven, Conn. STOMATOPOD CRUSTACEA COLLECTED BY THE YALE SEYCHELLES EXPEDITION, 1957-1958 Raymonp B. Mannine Instirute oF Marine Science, Universitry oF Mramt' Although small in size and number of species, the collection contains several rare species as well as several new records from the Seychelles. Of particular interest is the discovery of an undescribed species allied to Gonodactylus fimbriatus Lenz and G. brevisquamatus Paul’son. In all, ten species in three genera are represented, with all but two of the species in Gonodactylus. In the following account, complete synonymies are given only for the relatively rare species. In the case of common species, reference is made to the synonymies compiled by Kemp, 1913, and Holthuis, 1941, as well as more recent papers. The species are arranged as in Kemp, 1913. In addition to the material collected in the Seychelles proper, several specimens were col- lected in the Maldives, at Ceylon, etc., during the expedition, and these have been included in the account. Comparative notes and sketches of G. fimbriatus and G. brevisquamatus have been added in order to clarify their relationship to the new Gonodactylus. ‘Contribution No. 404 from The Marine Laboratory, University of Miami. 2 Postilla Yale Peabody Museum No. 68 The measurement following the number of specimens is in all cases total length, measured from the apices of the sub- median spines of the telson to the anterior margin of the ros- tral plate. All of the material has been depcsited in the Yale Peabody Museum (YPM). ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express my thanks to Dr. Willard D. Hart- man, Curator, Division of Invertebrate Zoology, Yale Peabody Museum for making this interesting collection available for study. I would also like to thank Dr. E. Deichmann, Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard, who kindly loaned + speci- mens of G. fimbriatus and Mr. R. W. Ingle, British Museum (Natural History), who loaned a specimen of G. brevisqua- matus for comparative purposes. The illustrations of the new species were drawn by my wife, Lilly Manning. Thanks are due to the National Science Foundation for their support of stomatopod systematics under Grant G-11235. Pseudosquilla ciliata (Fabricius, 1787) Pseudosquilla ciliata, Kemp, 1913:96; Holthuis, 1941:261. MateriaL. 16, 51.3 mm; YSE Sta. 9; seined offshore, Point Elizabeth, north of Trincomalee, Ceylon; N. Mahadeva; 22 August 1957; YPM 4326. Lystosquilla maculata (Fabricius, 1793) Lysiosquilla maculata, Kemp, 1913:111, pl. 8, figs. 86-91; Holt- huis, 1941: 269, fig. 5. MavreriaL. Ibrk. 2, 164.8 mm; Seychelles; collected by local inhabitants; YPM 4342. Gonodactylus chiragra (Fabricius, 1781) Gonodactylus chiragra, Kemp, 1913:155, pl. 9, fig. 107; Holthuis, 1941:277, fig. 7. Matrrian. 19, 51:2 mm; YSE Sta: 12; Foul Pt, Ceylon; W. D. Hartman; 28 August 1957; YPM 4328. Sept. 24, 1962 Stomatepod Crustacea 3 led 464 mm YSE, Sta. 17; Funadu Is., N: Male Atoll. Mal- dives; shoreward edge of reef, living in cavities in coral; W. D. Hartman; 19 September 1957; YPM 4329. 1g, 41.0 mm, 12, 23.1 mm; YSE Sta. 28; seaward reef, Ile du Coin, Peros Banhos Atoll, Chagos Archipelago; A. J. Kohn, W. D. Hartman; 23 October 1957; YPM 4833. 19, 15.2 mm; YSE Sta. 35B; northwest of Moyenne Is., Sey- chelles; A. J. Kohn; 20 January 1958; YPM 4456. 16,37.7 mm; YSE Sta. 41; seaward reef, Menai Is., Cosmoledo Atoll; A. J. Kohn; 10 December 1957; YPM 4838. 1 juv., 6.8 mm; YSE Sta. 53; Pasquére, Praslin Is., Seychelles; W. D. Hartman; 19 January 1958. Gonodactylus platysoma Wood-Mason, 1895 Gonodactylus chiragra var. platysoma, Kemp, 1918:162, text- fig. 1; Holthuis, 1941:281. MareriaL. 1 @, 86.1 mm; YSE Sta. 25C; Gan Is., Addu Atoll. Maldives: A. J. Kohn; 18 October 1957; YPM 43381. 19, 46.8 mm; YSE Sta. 27; lagoon side, Ile du Coin, Peros Banhos Atoll, Chagos Archipelago; W. D. Hartman; 22 October 1957; YPM 4332. Gonodactylus spinosus Bigelow, 18938 Gonodactylus spinosus Bigelow, 1893:101; Bigelow, 1894:493 ; Nobili, 1906:330; Borradaile, 1907:210; Bigelow, 1926:519, figs. iL. Gonodactylus chiragra spinosus, Lanchester, 19038:454, pl. fig. 14. fo) > ») 3 mts Gonodactylus demani spinosus, Kemp, 1913:165, pl. 9, fig. 112; Tattersall, 1921:361: Kemp and Chopra, 1921:311; Ramadan, 1936:9; Dollfus, 1938:215, fig. 17; Chopra, 1989:172. Mareriat. 19, 17.2 mm; YSE Sta. 30A; Bird Is., Seychelles; W. D. Hartman; 6 November 1957; YPM 4334. Remarks. As first pointed out by Kemp and Chopra (1921) and confirmed by Bigelow (1926), G. spinosus differs from G. 4 Postilla Yale Peabody Museum No. 68 demanit in having the inner branch of the uropod setose on all margins ; in G. demani the inner margin is devoid of setae. There is no reason to maintain spinosus as a variety or sub- species of G. demani, Varietal status does not have nomencla- tural significance, and as both spinosus and demani are sym- patric in the Red Sea as well as in other areas, they cannot be regarded as subspecies. No overlap or variation has been shown in the main character used to separate the two, so they must be regarded as distinct species. Chopra (1939) records this species from Mauritius to the Gulf of Suez, Red Sea, and Persian Gulf, and from Zanzibar to the Sea of Java, and Borradaile (1907) reported it from the Seychelles. Gonodactylus falcatus (Forskal, 1775) Cancer falcatus Forskal, 1775:96. Gonodactylus glabrous Brooks, 1886:62, pl. 14, fig. 5, pl. 15, figs. 7-OpeKemp: 19132167, plo; esis: Gonodactylus falcatus, Holthuis, 1941:284, fig. 9a. MarerraLt. 16, 40.1 mm; YSE Sta. 9: seined offshore, Point Elizabeth, north of Trincomalee, Ceylon; N. Mahadeva; YPM 4327. 1 ¢6,28.3 mm; YSE Sta. 22; Hulule Is., N. Male Atoll, Maldives: W. D. Hartman; 5 October 1957; YPM 4358. 3 2 9, 29.7-35.9 mm; YSE Sta. 36; in coral cavities, Anse a la Mouche (northern reef), Mahé Is., Seychelles; W. D. Hartman; 24 November 1957; YPM 4335. 2 9 2, 35.0-43.3 mm; YSE Sta. 36; Anse a la Mouche (northern reef), Mahé Is., Seychelles; A. J. Kohn; 22 December 1957; YPM 4336, 4337. Gonodactylus crinitus, new species Figure 1 Holotype. 1? , 27.5 mm; YSE Sta. 33; Beau Vallon, Mahé Is. Seychelles; A. J. Kohn; 1 February 1958: YPM 4459. Paratypes. 1 2 , 26.4 mm; data as in holotype; YPM 5510. 2 9, 28.2-28.8 mm; YSE Sta. 55; La Passe, Silhouette Is., Sey- chelles; A. J. Kohn; 6 February 1958; YPM 4340. Sept. 24, 1962 Stomatopod Crustacea 5 Imm Figure 1. Gonodactylus crinitus, n. sp. Female paratype, Mahé Is., Sey- chelles. A. Sixth abdominal somite and telson. B. Dorsal view of right uropod. C. Ventral view of right uropod. Telson length=2.9 mm. 6 Postilla Yale Peabody Museum No. 68 Description. Rostral plate with three sharp anterior spines ° median spine elongate, extending beyond base of eves; lateral spines broader, shorter, extending to base of eyes; rostral width at antero- lateral angles greater than median length. Carapace with anterolateral margins distally truncate and extend- ing well beyond base of rostral plate; lateral margins of carapace sinuate; posterior breadth greater than anterior. Mandibular palp two- or three-segmented; five epipods present; antennal scale extending to or beyond middle of cornea. First five abdominal somites wtih an impressed pit on upper median portion of pleuron; second to fifth somites with “reversed- L-shaped” groove anterolaterally: sixth abdominal somite with six longitudinal carinae, submedians broader than intermediates and all are swollen, with irregular margins. Telson with eleven dorsal carinae and four posterior spines, sub- medians with movable tips; anterior pair of tubercles present: me- dian carina swollen, with irregular margins; posterior margin of telson with a prominent median tubercle; above and anterior to this tubercle lie a pair of submedian tubercles: three carinae between median carina and carina of intermediate tooth; first pair not extending to anterior margin, flattening and widening anteriorly, converging posteriorly ; second pair much shorter than first. converg- ing posteriorly, not extending anteriorly past middle of telson: first and second pair (lateral to median carina) may fuse posteriorly in a transverse carina that runs toward median distal tubercle; third pair thinner, lving mesial to posterior portion of the carina of the intermediate tooth; carinae of intermediate tooth long. well-defined, extending almost to anterior margin of telson; marginal carinae sharp, fusing posteriorly with carina of intermediate tooth; a trans- verse, raised ridge, biconcave posteriorly, extends from base of third pair of carinae to base of carina of sebmedian tooth and from there to under the median tubercle; submedian teeth with movable apices and with 13-17 minute denticles on inner margin and a spinule on outer margin; intermediate teeth with a spinule on inner margin. Uropods with penultimate segment of outer branch not setose, ex- tending beyond distal segment; penultimate segment armed with seven lateral spines, first four small, movable, last three fixed, large, antepenultimate by far the largest; last three with tips corneous and strongly recurved; distal segment of outer branch elongate, paddle- shaped, dorsal margin setose on either side, median strip not setose, ventral margin not setose; inner branch elongate, outer margin con- vex, tapering to tip, inner half of dorsal margin setose, with proxi- Sept. 24, 1962 Stomatopod Crustacea 7 mal third of outer half without setae, ventral margin without setae; basal prolongation with proximal spine slender, almost as long as distal spine; distal spine recurved dorsally, outer margin concave distally. Color. Largely faded in preservative; carapace and body mottled green and white; eyestalks with scattered dark chromatophores ; mottling very pronounced on sixth abdominal somite and telson, carinae of telson appearing banded with white and green. Measurements. Holotype: total length, 27.5 mm; carapace length 5.6 mm; telson length, 2.9 mm; telson width, 3.6 mm. Female para- type, YSE Sta. 33: total length, 26.4 mm; carapace length, 5.0 mm; telson length, 2.9 mm; telson width, 3.4 mm. Discussion. G. crinitus is closely related to both G. fim- briatus Lenz and G. brevisquamatus Paul’son, but differs from both in having 11 dorsal carinae on the telson, lacking setation on the dorsal surface of the proximal segment of the uropod, and lacking ventral setation on the ventral surface of the uropod. Differences between the three species are summarized in Table 1. G. fimbriatus has been synonymized with G. brevisquamatus since the remarks of Kemp (1913) and Tattersall (1921) based on an unpublished account by Patience in which the two were synonymized. The two species have not been directly com- pared since that time. Tattersall’s action was followed by Kemp and Chopra (1921), Ramadan (1936), and Dollfus (1938). Serene (1949) kept the two species separate in his discussion of the position of G. strigatus Hansen. The two species are very closely related and in my opinion they are distinct. An adequate series might show that they deserve only subspecific status. Four specimens of G. fimbriatus (all 2? 2, total length 21.4- 30.7 mm; Zanzibar; Cooke, col.; MCZ 7817) and one of G. brevisquamatus (2, 27.2 mm; Tella Tella Kebira, Sudanese Red Sea; C. Crossland, col.; B. M. (N. H.) registry 1936.9.30. 1-2) were examined: the latter specimen was one of those examined by Tattersall (1921). The following notes were taken from this material. Dorsal Carinae Submedian denticles Intermediate denticles Uropods Exopod, prox. seg. Exopod, distal seg. Endopod Basal prolongation 9 + 14, in one series 1 on submedian, 1 on intermediate tooth with a dorsal patch of setae broadly rounded distally, outer and inner margins about equally convex; setose proximally on dorsal margin, all of dorsal setae short short, rounded distally ; com- pletely setose ventrally outer spine much larger than inner 9 10-12 in 2 series 6-10 in 2 series on submedian, 6-8 on intermediates with a dorsal patch of setae tapering distal- ly, outer margin much more convex than inner; setose proximal- ly on dorsal margin, all of dorsal setae short short, bluntly truncate distally ; com- pletely setose ventrally outer spine much larger than inner 8 Postilla Yale Peabody Museum No. 68 TasLe 1. Comparison of Gonodactylus brevisquamatus Paulson, G. fimbriatus Lenz, and G. crinitus n. sp. G. brevisquamatus G. fimbriatus G. crinitus Telson 11 13-17 in one series 1 on submedian, 1 on intermediate no dorsal patch of setae tapering distal- ly outer and inner margins about equally convex; non- setose prox. on dorsal margin, all of dorsal setae long elongate, tapering distally ; no ventral setae inner outer spine slightly larger than G. fimbriatus and G. brevisquamatus are very similar in gen- eral appearance. They differ primarily in the number and ar- ‘angement of submedian and intermediate spinules on the telson (Table 1) and in the shape of the uropod segments. A ventral view of the uropod of each species is shown in Figure 2; seta- tion is omitted for clarity. In G. brevisquamatus, the distal segment of the outer branch is broadly rounded and the inner branch tapers distally. In G. fimbriatus, the distal segment Sept. 24, 1962 Stomatopod Crustacea 9 of the outer branch tapers and the inner branch is truncate distally. Both are similar in lateral spination of the proximal segment of the outer branch. The inner spine of the basal pro- longation is comparatively longer in G. brevisquamatus. Both species have a pair of short submedian carinae on the ventral surface; these carinae converge anteriorly but do not meet. Imm _ Figure 2. A. G. brevisquamatus Paul’son, Red Sea, ventral view of right uropod; B. G. fimbriatus Lenz, Zanzibar, ventral view of right uropod. Smaller lateral spines present in both species; they are obscured by the basal prolongation in 2A. 10 Postilla Yale Peabody Museum No. 68 The setation of the uropods is characteristic in both. The proximal segment of the outer branch bears a prominent, circu- lar patch of setae on the dorsal surface. The ventral surface of the uropeds is completely setose, with a thick, circular, prox- imal patch of strong setae. G. fimbriatus has been reported from Zanzibar (Lenz, 1905: 38, pl. 47, fig. 11; 1910:572) and Coétivy, Seychelles (Bor- radaile, 1907 :211). Seréne (1949 :231, 235) mentioned a speci- men from the Mergui Archipelago, perhaps from Kemp’s (1918:175) reference to Patience’s material. Other than Patience’s questionable record of G. brevisqua- matus from the Mergui Archipelago, that species is known only from the Red Sea. Patience’s specimens may actually have belonged to G. fimbriatus rather than G. brevisquamatus. The following papers record G. brevisquamatus: Paulson, 1875: 127, pl. 21, fig. 3; Nobili, 1906 :331; Kemp, 1913:174, pl. 10, figs. 115, 116; Tattersall, 1921:362, pl. 27, figs. 556) Kemp and Chopra, 1921 :311; Ramadan, 1936:10; Dollfus, 1938 :222, fice Zl Remarks. The curious arrangement of setae and spines on the uropods of G. brevisquamatus and G. fimbriatus is perhaps worthy of further mention. The large, recurved spines on the uropod may be used by the animal to “lock” itself in its burrow. The uropods are curved ventrally, so that the telson and uro- pods together form half of a circle. The inner branches of the uropods recurve dorsally. The setae of the uropods are so ar- ranged that, when viewed from behind the animal, they appear as a rounded “basket,” as if they were utilized as a filtering apparatus. All of the specimens of G. fimbriatus had the setose areas loaded with detritus and sand which had to be washed away before the uropod structure could be observed. The significance of these structures is not readily apparent. The mouthparts and raptorial claws appear unmodified, and it seems unlikely that these species are filter-feeders. Observations on these species in the field would be most welcome. Characters based on the relative length of the rostral plate or antennal scale in relation to the eye must be used with some caution in the stomatopods. Such characters vary according to Sept. 24, 1962 Stomatopod Crustacea iat the state of contraction or expansion of the body at preserva- tion. In future work, more attention should be given to the shape of the uropods and their investment of setae. These characters coupled with the configuration of the telson are ap- parently diagnostic in this group of Gonodactylus (Group IL of Kemp, 1913). Name.The specific name is from the Latin, “crinitus,” fringed, and refers to the setation of the uropods. Gonodactylus lenzi Holthuis, 1941 Protosquilla glabra Lenz, 1905:388, pl. 47, fig. 18; Lenz. 1910: 572 [listed only]. Geonodactylus glaber, Kemp, 1913:182, pl. 10, fig. 121; Kemp, 1915:186; Roxas and Estampador, 1930:124, pl. 3, fig. 5; Roxas, 1930:18; Chopra, 1934:42; Gravier, 1937:208: Seréne, 1947:385, fig. I pl...2. Gonodactylus lenzi Holthuis, 1911:288; Tiwari and Biswas, 1952: 362; Seréne, 1954:6 [larval stages, p. 34 et seq.]. Marteriat. 136, 25.7 mm; YSE Sta. 38; Beau Vallon, Mahé Is., Seychelles; inhabiting dead corals; A. J. Kohn; 1 February 1958; YPM 4458. Remarks. The specimen agrees with Kemp’s account in al- most all respects. The posterior spines of the telson are of equal size. The corrugations of the lateral margins of the tel- son are not visible, but the three central bosses of the telson are faintly corrugated. The specimen figured by Seréne (1947) has the bosses of the telson much more inflated than in the present specimen; both Serene and Gravier (1937) commented on the variability of the median bosses of the telson. The color pattern in preservative is striking. The antennular flagella are banded purple and white. The rostral plate, oph- thalmic somite and the two distal segments of the raptorial claw are bluish with scattered dark chromatophores. The body is cream colored and densely covered with dark chromato- phores which are aggregated in dark patches on the posterior portion of the carapace, sixth and seventh thoracic somites, 13 Postilla Yale Peabody Museum No. 68 and second to fourth abdominal somites. Kemp (1913) found these patches on the first, fourth, and fifth abdominal somites. The fifth and sixth abdominal somites, telson, and uropods are outlined in blue. This species has not previously been recorded from the Sey- chelles. The records in the literature are: Zanzibar (I.enz, 1905) ; Ceylon (Lenz, 1910); Andamans (Kemp, 1913; Tiwari and Biswas, 1952); Nicobars (Chopra, 1934); Bay of Batavia (Holthuis, 1941); Poulo Condore Islands (Gravier, 1937) ; Nhatrang, Viet Nam (Gravier, 1937; Seréne, 1947, 1954) ; Philippines (Kemp, 1913; Roxas, 1930; Roxas and Kstam- pador, 1930). Gonodactylus gyrosus Odhner, 1923 Gonodactylus gyrosus Odhner, 1923:11, pl. i, figs. 4, 5; Ward, 1942:56; Tiwari and Biswas, 1952:362, fig. 5; Holthuis, 1953:61. MateriAL. 192, 41.5 mm; YSE Sta. 55; La Passe, Silhouette Is., Seychelles; A. J. Kohn; 6 February 1958; YPM 4341. Remarks. The rostral plate of this specimen is somewhat shorter than that illustrated by Tiwari and Biswas (1952), as the median spine does not exceed the cornea. The cornea is noticeably bilobed, and the eyes are comparatively shorter. The color pattern is similar to that shown by Tiwari and Biswas. The background color is cream, with many dark chro- matophores in patterns on the anterior part of the body. The fifth abdominal somite is lined anteriorly and posteriorly with green. The sixth abdominal somite and telson are mottled green and white. The mandibular palp is present, apparently two-segmented. This species has not previously been recorded from the Sey- chelles. The records in the hterature are: Arno Atoll, Marshall Is. (Holthuis) ; Gilbert Islands (Odhner) ; Andamans (Tiwari and Biswas) ; Diego Garcia, Chagos Archipelago (Ward). Gonodactylus guerini White, 1861 Gonodactylus guerini White, 1861:43, pl. 6; Bigelow, 1931:139 [and synonymy]; Townsley, 1953 :4238, figs. 20, 21a-f; Seréne, 1954: 52 [discussion only J. Sept. 24, 1962 Stomatopod Crustacea he MareriaLt. 12, 35.5 mm; YSE Sta. 414A; anchorage off Menai Is., Cosmoledo Atoll; 25 fms.; W. D. Hartman; 12 December 1957; YPM 4447. Remarks. The specimen agrees well with the description given by Bigelow (1931). The right submedian elevation of the telson bears a curved row of six instead of five spines as in Bigelow’s material. The color is as noted by Bigelow, with two dark transverse bands on the carapace; each of the thoracic and abdominal somites are banded. The spines of the telson are flushed with pink. Bigelow gave a complete synonymy, which will not be re- peated here, and recorded the following distribution: Hawan, Marquesas, Fiji, and Mauritius, in depths ranging from a few feet to 60 fms. Townsley (1953) reported on other Hawanan specimens in depths of 50 to 120 fms. The present specimen extends the range 900 miles to the north of Mauritius. Lirerarure Crrep Bigelow, R. P. 1893. Preliminary notes on the Stomatopoda of the Al- batross collections and on other specimens in the National Museum. Johns Hopkins Univ. Cire., 72(106): 100-102. , 1894. Report on the Crustacea of the Order Stomatopoda col- lected by the steamer Albatross between 1885 and 1891, and on other specimens in the U. S. National Museum. Proc. U. S. Natl. Mus., /7: 489-550, pls. 20-22, text-figs. 1-28. 1926. On the type of Gonodactylus spinosus, a stomatopod Crustacean. Amer. Nat., 60(671): 579-582, text-figs. 1-2. , 1931. Stomatopoda of the southern and eastern Pacific Ocean and the Hawaiian Islands. Bull. Mus. comp. Zool. Hary., 7.2(4) :105-191, pls. 1-2, text-figs. 1-10. Borradaile, L. A. 1907. Stomatopoda from the Western Indian Ocean. The Percy Sladen Trust Expedition to the Indian Ocean in 1905, under the leadership of Mr. J. Stanley Gardiner. Trans. Linn. Soc. London, Zool., ser. 2, 12: 209-216, pl. 22. Brooks, W. K. 1886. The Stomatopoda collected by H. M. S. Challenger during the years 1873-76. Report on the Scientific Results of the Exploring Voyage of H. M. S. Challenger, /6:1-116, pls. 1-16. Chopra, B. 1934. On the stomatopod Crustacea collected by the Bengal Pilot Service off the mouth of the River Hughli, together with some notes on other forms. Rec. Ind. Mus., Calcutta, 36:17-43, text-figs. 1-5. —————.,, 1939. Stomatopoda. ‘The John Murray Expedition, Sci. Repts., 6 (3) :137-181, figs. 1-13. 14 Postilla Yale Peabody Museum No. 68 Dollfus, R. Ph. 1938. Stomatopoda (II). Catalogue synonymique des especes jusqu’a présent recoltées dans la Mer Rouge, y compris la partie sud du Canal de Suez et le Golfe d’Aden. Mission Robert Ph. Dollfus en Egypte. X. Mém. Inst. Egypte, 37:185-236, text-figs. 1-23. Forksal, P. 1775. Descriptiones animalium, avium...et insectorum, quae in itinere orientali observavit. Ed. Carston Niebuhr, Havyniae (not seen). Gravier, C. 1937. Stomatopodes des cotes d’Indochine. Ann. Inst. Oceanogr., Paris, 7:175-211, text-figs. 1-23. Holthuis, L. B. 1941. Biological Results of the Snellius Expedition, XII. The Stomatopoda of the Snellius Expedition. Temminckia, 6: 241-294, text-figs. 1-9. —, 19553. Enumeration of the decapod and stomatopod Crustacea from Pacific coral islands. Atoll Research Bull., No. 24:1-66. Kemp, S. 1913. An account of the Crustacea Stomatopoda of the Indo- pacific region. Mem. Ind. Mus., Calcutta, 4:1-217, pls. 1-10, 10 text- figs. —, 1915. On a collection of stomatopod Crustacea from the Philip- pine Islands. Philippine Journ. Sci., 70D:169-186, pl. i. Kemp, S. and Chopra, B. 1921. Notes on Stomatopoda. Rec. Ind. Mus., Caleutta, 22: 297-311, text-figs. 1-4. Lanchester, W. F. 1903. Marine crustaceans. VIII. Stomatopoda, with an account of the varieties of Gonodactylus chiragra. In: Gardiner, J. S., The fauna and geography of the Maldive and Laccadive Archipelagoes. Being an account of the work carried on and of the collections made by an Expedition during the years 1899 and 1900. vol. 1: 444-459, pl. 28. Lenz, H. 1905. Ostafrikanische Dekapoden und Stomatopoden gesammelt von Herrn Prof. Dr. A. Voeltzkow. Jn: Voeltzkow, A., Wissenschaft- liche Ergebnisse der Reisen in Madagaskar und Ostafrika in den Jahren 1889-95. Vol. III. Abh. Senckenb. naturf. Ges., 27: 341-392, pls. 47-48. ——, 1910. Crustaceen yon Madagaskar, Ostafrika, und Ceylon. Jn: Voeltzkow, A., Reise in Ostafrika in den Jahren 1903-1905..., 2: 539- 576. Nobili, G. 1906. Faune carcinologique de la Mer Rouge. Decapodes et Stomatopodes. Ann. sci. nat. Zool., Paris, ser. 9, 4:1-347, pls. 1-11, text- figs. 1-12. Odhner, T. 1923. Indopazifische Stomatopoden. Goteborgs Vet. Handl., Ser. 4, 27(4) :1-16, pl. 1. Paulson, O. 1875. Studies on Crustacea of the Red Sea with notes regard- ing other seas. I. Podophthalmata and Edriophthalmata (Cumacea), pp. xiv + 145, pls. 1-21. Kiev.* Ramadan, M. M. 1936. Report on a collection of Stomatopoda and De- capoda from Ghardaqa, Red Sea. Bull. Fac. Sci. Egypt Uniy., No. 6:1- 43, pls. 1-2. *Paulson’s rare 1875 paper on the Crustacea of the Red Sea originally appeared in Russian; an English translation of this work was published in 1961 for the National Science Foundation and the Smithsonian Institu- tion by the Israel Program for Scientific Translations. It is available in the United States from the Office of Technical Services, U. S. Department of Commerce, Washington 25, D. C. Sept. 24, 1962 Stomatopod Crustacea 15) Roxas, H. A. 1930. The Puerto Galera Marine Biological Laboratory of the University of the Philippines (A report to the President of the University, together with a check-list of animals of the Puerto Galera region), pp. 1-24, pls. 1-4. Roxas, H. A. and E. Estampador. 1930. Stomatopoda of the Philippines. Natural app. Sci. Bull., Manila, /: 93-131, pls. 1-6. Seréne, R. 1947. Sur les stomatopodes rares trouvés en Indochine et n’ exist- ant pas dans les collections du Museum. Bull. Mus. Hist. Nat., Paris, ser. 2, /9(5): 381-389, 4 pls. —————, 1949. Observations sur le Gonodactylus strigatus Hansen (Crustacé Stomatopode). Bull. Soc. Zool. France, 74(4-5) : 225-231, 2 text-figs. —, 1954. Observations biologiques sur les stomatopodes. Ann. Inst. Oceanogr. Monaco, 29:1-91, pls. 1-10, text-figs. 1-15. Tattersall, W. M. 1921. Report on the Stomatopoda and macrourus De- capoda collected by Mr. Cyril Crossland in the Sudanese Sea. Journ. Linn. Soc. London, Zool., 34: 345-398, pls. 27-28. Tiwari, K. K. and S. Biswas. 1952. On two new species of the genus Squilla Fabr.; with notes on other stomatopods in the collections of the Zoological Survey of India. Rec. Ind. Mus., Calcutta, 49: 349-363, text-figs. 1-5. Townsley, Sidney J. 1953. Adult and larval stomatopod crustaceans oc- curring in Hawaiian waters. Pacific Sci., 7 (4) : 399-437, text-figs. 1-28. Ward, M. 1942. Notes on the Crustacea of the Desjardins Museum, Mauri- tius Institute, with descriptions of new genera and species. Mauritius Inst. Bull., 2: 49-113. White, A. 1861. Descriptions of two species of Crustacea belonging to the Families Callianassidae and Squillidae. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond., 1861: 42- 44, pls. 6, 7. way an ac ch ASPB Date Due Harvard MCZ Libra' ee ee eae Rigo PRP Sate mses ee eet SN PPL Saupe It eas Tinwajmcn pain DAP Sp A Pe mares PO ae * panel TET alae as 4 are ae Pe Oa tL ems aphpeae eee oes tet eT al PP rw - Eames Me 4 . paleo ae*: en oag awn 2s ix ars iG ODOT, oe eranporore : : SiS ipa in apr ont raga gaan Sone ee IS ~ een ap. aio ates toat OI ae eta -f Picea, ery i a ont . - : aw Piva Fe emt wore en = a SP Pe,