4D PAYING

c n o

GERMAN KALI WORKS

OF C '

AftPIP HPPT

AND

Paying Crops

FURNISHED GRATUITOUSLY

TO THE

NEW YORK AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION

FOR DISTRIBUTION AS THEY MAY APPROVE
TO THE

FARMERS OF NEW YORK.

Compiled and Copyrighted by

A. DE GHEQUIER,
Accredited Representative

of the
German Kali Works.

INTRODUCTION.

If an apology were needed for this compilation, the first public
document issued by the Department of Agriculture, after its elevation
to an executive department with a Cabinet officer at its head would
offer the same; for the report of the Committee of the Association of
Agricultural Colleges and Experiment Stations, therein quoted, con-
tains the following pregnant passages: "To one familiar with the
history of this sort of research, it is interesting to note how many of
the problems suggested for study by the different stations are nearly,,
or quite, identical with those with which the work of the experiment,
stations was begun when the first ones were founded, over thirty years
ago, and how large a proportion are, in fact, the same that have been
the object of the bulk of the study of these and other institutions of
research in this country, in England, and, to a far larger extent, on
the Continent of Europe, for half a century." And again: "The
difficulties which the newer stations have to meet are enhanced by
the fact that nearly all the accumulated experience is recorded in
foreign literature, and is accessible only to thofee who have at hand the
great accumulation of journals and other publications in which the
results of earlier and later research are set forth." Therefore, the
committee is strongly of the opinion that "one of the most useful
services to the cause would exist in the compilation of the main
results of this research in various special lines, and the putting of
them not only into English, but in forms conveniently suited to the
use of American investigators."

An attempt to lay before the large body of intelligent American
farmers, in clear, concise, intelligible language, the latest practical
results of agricultural science in Germany, may, therefore, hope to be
not altogether unwelcome. Destined mainly to enlighten the tiller
of the soil about the great importance of soil nutrition, and to impress
upon his mind in a brief way the latest discoveries regarding the
problem of fertilization, this publication does not claim to enter
deeply into the scientific aspect of the subject matter, but to give only.

320945

in a popular way enough of it to render the subject perfectly easy
of comprehension to any and all readers. As Professor Atwater, the
Director of the Office of Experiment Stations, regards it as an auspi-
cious circumstance that the initial publication, issued under the
Secretary of Agriculture, is one relating to an enterprise in which
science joins hands with the art of agriculture in an effort to secure
the greater welfare of mankind, so does the hope appear also .per-
missible that the effort of German enterprise to lend its willing aid
and assistance to the great work undertaken by the United States,
may meet with a friendly reception.

A list of the works and publications which furnished the material
for this compilation is appended at the end. More detailed informa-
tion can be obtained on application to the office of the —

GERMAN KALI WORKS,
<

1416 F STREET, N. W. (Keilogg Building),
WASHINGTON, D. C.

Agricultural Science and Its Main Object.

The prosperity of any agricultural country depends upon the
prosperity of its agricultural community, and the latter, in turn,
depends upon the quantity and the quality of the crops raised on
its land. That country takes the lead , in the long run, which raises
on a given area twice as much as another country; that farmer
is more prosperous who raises on a ten-acre field as much, if not
more, than another does on twenty acres. This plain, simple
and self-evident consideration establishes at once the pre-emi-
nent position which in our days agricultural science should, and
as a matter of fact, does occupy in civili/ed countries. For, the
ultimate object of all scientific research, of all work in the
laboratory, and of all field experiments, is not so much the
unearthing of a scientific truth as rather the practical application
of scientific truths to farming, so as to render this pursuit more
prorfitable and less uncertain.

Agricultural science embraces necessarily a very wide field.
The chemistry and physics of the atmosphere and soil, the ex-
haustion of the soil and its restoration to fertility by tillage and
artificial manures, the composition of plants and their adaptation
to different localities and climates, the feeding of animals, the
production of milk, butter, cheese and other dairy matters, the
diseases of plants and animals, fruit culture and a variety of
other subjects belong legitimately to the science of agriculture.
But of all these problems there is one which has occupied the
main attention of science from the very start, and which at the
same time concerns the most vital interests of the farmer and
that subject is artificial fertilization.

Every farmer knows that even the richest soil, after a while,
decreases steadily in fertility; that the ground becomes worn
out, exhausted, unable to respond to the demands made upon

6

it. To raise paying crops to-day, without artificial fertilization,
is possible only where stable-manure of the best quality can be
offered in abundant quantities to the fields, and that possibility
is an exception and not the rule, least of all in a country like
the United States, where the area under cultivation is dispro-
portionately large to the number of cattle kept on it, and where,
moreover, the amount of stable-manure produced is, owing to
the mode of farming, much below the figure that might be
produced.

ARTIFICIAL FERTILIZATION.

The necessity of artificial fertilization was recognized at an
early day by American farmers, who were not slow in bringing
to their service the commercial fertilizer, a commodity as indis-
pensable to-day to profitable farming as food is for the sustenance
of the body. But, after all, commercial fertilizers are nothing
but food, not for the human body, it is true, but for the plant.
Plants require food, like animals and human beings, and it is
only natural that plants cannot thrive luxuriously unless they
are properly and well fed.

Proper plant nutrition forms, consequently, that portion of
agricultural science in which the farmer' s interest centers and
which, also (let it be emphasized), engages the most careful and
diligent labor of the scientists. To solve this vexed and very
complex problem successfully is the aim and ambition, not of
one, but of all who devote their life-work and brain-energy, for
the benefit of the farmers, to scientific research in this direction.
At first sight it would seem that the solution could not be very
difficult, because the progress made in agricultural chemistry is
such that the scientist can tell exactly by analysis what each
plant removes from the soil, and in what quantities. Now, if
the analysis of the soil is compared to it, it would seem as if a
comparison of the two would show at a glance what the soil
requires, and in what quantities; but he who would act on the
knowledge gained by such comparison would, in many cases,
find out to his detriment that the conclusion so drawn was too
hasty and one-sided. There was a time, indeed, and that
time belongs to the very recent past, when even scientists held

that a plant that contains in its crop-substance three and four
times as much nitrogen as another plant, requires for that reason
a more liberal quantity of nitrogen in the soil. But that time is
past. It has been found that the requirements of plants for
nutrition and for fertilization are by no means the same, and this
discovery has done much towards elucidating the subject by
directing the research to a closer study of plant-growth, that
is of the principle of plant-life.

WHAT IS PLANT GROWTH?

Now, plant-growth, if a definition is to be attempted, might
be defined as the transformation of inorganic into organic
substances. All plants, without exception, require mineral
substances out of which by means of certain raw materials the}'
form organic matter, viz. : the grains of wheat, barley, oats, or
the potatoes, beets, peas, tobacco leaves, cotton bolls, etc.
The mineral substances, viz.: phosphoric acid, potash, lime,
soda, etc., are furnished by the soil, while the air furnishes the
carbonic acid, the sky the water; nitrogen has, in many cases,
to be furnished with the mineral subtances by man.

The problem of plant-nutrition narrows itself down, there-
fore, to the question of nitrogen, phosphoric acid and potash
(more correctly, kali), as nearly all other mineral substances
are, as a rule, in entirely sufficient quantities in any soil, with
the exception, perhaps, of lime. The absence of lime, how-
ever, manifests itself so easily and so surely, that for general
observations lime need not be taken into consideration. Where-
ever it forms an essential element it will be mentioned.

WHEREIN CONSISTS RATIONAL
FERTILIZATION.

Proper fertilization consists therefore in a thorough and
correct understanding of the nitrogen, the phosphoric acid and
the potash question. In that sense it has been taken up
by science, and in that sense it has been taken up by
all practical farmers. Science established, for instance, that

phosphoric acid, in order to produce perceptible immediate
results upon any crop, must be given to the plants in an avail-
able form;- and so with potash and with nitrogen. The very fact
that many State laws do not admit fertilizers for sale, unless
they contain certain percentages of these elements in a form
available to the plants, serves as a proof, if any were needed,
that the farmer's interest lies in procuring such plant- food as
science has established beyond gainsaying to be valuable as
plant-food, and that the farmer's interests are properly protected
by these State laws against imposition by unscrupulous parties.
Yet, while this protection of the farmer appears in a most
favorable light in one sense, it checks agricultural progress in
another sense. Hardly two soils are alike, and if two were
exactly alike, location and other circumstances might alter their
requirements entirely. Yet, .considering all ciraumctsnces, the
fertilizer-laws of the several States require only to be made
more uniform, and to be placed upon a more scientific basis than
that upon which some of them rest at present, in order tp attain
the purpose for which they have been framed, namely, the pro-
tection of the most vital interest of the country, its agriculture.

THE REQUIREMENTS OF NUTRITION AND
FERTILIZATION ARE NOT THE SAME.

The problem of fertilization and its solution depends, as has
been stated, upon a thorough knowledge of plant-growth and
plant-nutrition. It has also been remarked already that the re-
quirements of plants for nutrition and for fertilization are not the
same. Yery careful investigations of the process of plant-
growth and discoveries resulting from this research have thrown
an entirely new light upon the whole subject of fertilization.
To make, however, perfectly clear what will be said later on,
it is necessary to make here a few remarks about plant-growth.

PLANT-GROWTH.

A grain of wheat put into the ground germinates in due
course of time; it shoots out a tiny little leaflet, and this leaflet
feeds on the organic substance of the seed; it lives, as it were,

9

on mother's milk. Not until the second leaflet appears is the
stock of food contained in the seed exhausted; then, however,
a change of food takes place, the tiny wheat-plant, by means of
its roots, looks up and takes up now the inorganic food of the
soil, namely: phosphoric acid, nitrogen, potash, magnesia, lime,
etc., and in proportion as this nutriment is abundant, and the-
season propitious, it grows and develops into a tall, rich stalk,
with full heavy ears. There are, consequently, but two stages
noticeable in its growth; the one, that of germination carried on
by means of organic food; the other, the growth into maturity
under exclusive inorganic nutriment.

Not so with leguminous plants. At first they do exactly what
the cereals and all other non-leguminous plants do. The pea
germinates and lives on mother's milk, that is to say, the organic
food of the seed, and then, like the grain of wheat, changes its
diet to inorganic food. But the second period of nutrition is- fol-
lowed by a third, requiring twice to four times as much nitrogen
as the cereals do, for instance; the pea develops the capacity to
draw its requisite amount of nitrogen from the air, and becomes,
after the second stage of growth, altogether independent of the
nitrogen supply of the soil.

NITROGEN CONSUMERS AND NITROGEN
GATHERERS.

The practical bearing of this division of plants into nitrogen-
ionsntncrs and nitrogen-gatherers, is of the utmost importance to
the farmer, as will be seen later on. For the present it suffices
to remark that to fertilize nitrogen-gatherers with anything but
phosphates and potash, is sheer waste, is money thrown away.
Rarely do cases occur where leguminous plants do not find suf-
ficient nitrogen in the soil to bridge over from the first to the
third stage of nutrition successfully. The few instances where
they do require it are announced to the eye by the pale, yellowish
color of the young plants, and in such cases a small application
of nitrate of soda is not too late to still their hunger, so that it
may be asserted as a rule that leguminous plants require no fer-
tilization with nitrogen.

10

This long-disputed fact has been settled in a final manner
through Professor Hellriegel, Professor Wagner, E- von Wolff
and others, so that it is no longer a debatable question.

For the sake of furnishing an irresistible proof that fertiliza-
tion with nitrogen produces no effect whatsoever upon the class
'of nitrogen-gathering plants, and of the very decided results
produced upon nitrogen-consuming plants, the following table is
reprinted from Prof. Dr. Paul Wagner's work "On the increase
of the yield of the soil by rational nitrogen fertilization."

Wheat, barley, beans and luzerne were planted on one and
the same field without nitrogen, with 18 pounds nitrogen per
acre and with 31.5 pounds and 45 pounds with the following
results, phosphoric acid and potash being furnished in all cases
in like quantities:

No Nitrogen. 18 Ibs. N. 31.5 Ibs. N. 45 Ibs. N.

Barley 100 161 220 272

Wheat 138 212 270 316

Beans 935 938 961 883

Luzerne 976 983 1000 994

While nitrogen fertilization shows very decided results propor-
tionate to the quantities furnished to the plants in the case of
barley and wheat, it shows no effect whatsoever in the case of
the two leguminous plants, beans and luzerne. It proves, how-
ever, something else. While barley was only able to take up
from the soil enough nitrogen to produce a crop of 100 (barley
being chosen as standard for comparison), and wheat only to
give 138, beans and luzerne were able to procure enough
nitrogen to produce at once 935 and 976 respectively. With
nitrogen supplied to the soil the yield of barley nearly trebled,
and that of wheat more than doubled, showing that these plants
depend upon the nitrogen supply of the soil, while the others
are independent of such supply.

Now, what is the practical value to the farmer of this study
of the various phases of plant-life and of the experiments based
upon that study? The result is this: all intelligent farmers who
know of the difference between leguminous and non-leguminous
plants, as regards their ability and inability to draw upon the
limitless supply of nitrogen contained in the atmosphere, will
no longer spend money for nitrogenous fertilizers for leguminous
plants. And yet, as Prof. Wagner remarks, ' ' but a few years
ago the advice was given to fertilize peas, beans, etc., and all

11

perennial plants like luzerne, clover, etc., with nitrate of soda.
That advice was incorrect; it rested upon an insufficient knowl-
edge about the nitrogen nutrition of these plants. They do
require from two to three times as much nitrogen as wheat,
oats, corn, etc., yet they do not show under normal conditions
any increase worth mentioning, if fertilized with nitrogen."

Now, though it is perhaps unnecessary to state, nitrogen is
the most expensive ingredient of any fertilizer; the doing away
with nitrogen fertilization in case of all leguminous plants,
saves therefore to the farmer all the money that might have
been spent on it, if he did not know of this late scientific
discovery. But this is not all. Nitrogen being, as has just
been said, the most costly element of plant-food, the further
question suggested itself: can the capacity of the leguminous
plants, to take up nitrogen from the atmosphere, be utilized by
the farmer to procure nitrogen for other crops without having
to pay for it ? And that question, certainly a downright prac-
tical question, has been answered also. Before, however,
giving the answer, a few words about the part which nitrogen
plays in the household of nature, or rather during the process
of plant-growth, appear not out of place, because they will
greatly facilitate the understanding of all that follows.

NITROGEN REGULATES PLANT-GROWTH.

Nitrogen acts as regulator of the productive capacity of all
non-leguminous plants. The subjoined table shows the amount
of potash (K2O) phosphoric acid and nitrogen contained in the
average crops of the several plants, the dry substance of the
harvest products, grain as well as straw, being comprised
therein.

TABLE

Showing hoiv many pounds of the constituents mentioned are
withdrawn per acre by an average crop.

Potash
(Kali).
K20

Phos-
phoric
Acid.
P205

Nitro-
gen.

N

Wheat

- Q

Rve .

5^

<i f\

45

ill

0

Barley

70

(\t

• 44

87

Oats

r\f\

35

75

0 _

Corn

90

35

A/-k

09

X"

Rice

£74

69

146

Sorghum

45

24
/CO

39

Buckwheat

71

129

/: _

X7

fir»

4°

°3

Horsepea (Vicia faba)

Op

39
f. ,

J53

Soja bean (Soja hispida)

8*7

04
f\^

254

L,upine, yellow (I^upinus luteus)

°7

Sn

297

L,upine, green, for fodder

f\i

37
A(\

J55

°3

4°

219

Sugar beet beet-root

192

55

119

Cattle turnips

44

95

T P.T

Carrots

74

fir

187

T^fi

°5

T £fi

Corn, fodder, green

2?6

53
fifi

Clover (trifolium pratense)

Z JO

T5?

Clover, green (trifolium pratense)

29

I C A

Afl

37

lyUcerne (medicago sativa)

L54

181

4°
ficr

171

2 5s r»

Clover (trifolium repens)

c8

°5

Kf\

Red clover (trifolium incarnatum)

5°

29

°9

Hsparsette

57

T Q <J

T7
-}fi

95

103

3°

2j9

T ?R

Vetch (Vicia sativa)

I I 1

57
•j f

T J/-1

L 13

T 2 A

35

149

PODDV . .

i ^4

O 2

79

-3Q

f 54
87

Hemp (cannabivs sativa)

y^

ou

°7

Cotton

54

•7 C

34

65

I 2 *7

32

Tobacco ...

127
T/l8

54

I O*7

32

•3 7

127
crS

Sorghum (Sorghum saccharatum)

X \J f

c6i

37

5 10

\^hite cabbage

oul

C T A

9°

j n £

44U

Cauliflower

5 L4

26$

125

76

213

202

L/ettuce (L/actuca sativa)

^uo

*7 2

7U

T 7

A T

Cucumbers

/ z
T O "2

1 7

41

Onions ..

Iyo

06

94

/in

142

nfi

13

Now the next question of practical importance is this: Does an
average crop of these plants require the soil to contain as many
pounds of nitrogen as the table indicates? To this science
answers no, for the simple reason that the roots and the
stalks which remain on the field, and are not included in
the dry substance, contain also nitrogen, and because, more-
over, it is impossible to assume that the entire supply
of nitrogen can ever be taken up by any crop. There-
fore, more than the table indicates must be in the ground.
Of 100 pounds of nitrate of soda, analyzing on an average from
fifteen to sixteen per cent, of nitrogen, probably not more than
ten pounds are utilized for the production of a crop. Now 100
pounds of nitrate of soda per acre, that is to say, a fertilization
of ten pounds of nitrogen per acre, should produce results
which are easy to calculate. If sixty pounds of nitrogen are
contained in a crop of 2140 pounds of oats, and 3500 of straw,
then ten pounds of nitrogen should produce an additional quan-
tity of some 350 pounds of oats and some 580 pounds of straw.

The average content of nitrogen of all plants which are gen-
erally being cultivated is known, hence the additional amount
which ten pounds of nitrogen should produce in harvest sub-
stance, should be as follows:

Wheat 350 pounds

Rye 330

Barley 420

Oats 350

Maize (corn) 420

Rice looo

Buckwheat 420

Potatoes 2600

Beet roots 4500

Cattle turnips. . . . 3900

Carrots 3?oo

Chicory 3400

Meadow hay 645

Green maize 5300

Rape 210

Poppy 170

Cotton 270

Hops 70

Sugar-cane 2000

White cabbage . . . 4200

Cauliflower 1500

Kohl-rabi 1400

Cucumbers 6000

Onions... 3700

of grain and 500 pounds of straw
850
600
580
580
1 200
640

tubers 300
roots 900 lea -es

1000

560
410
hay

green plant substance,
grain and 600 pounds of straw
seed 500 " "

100

flowers 320 " leaves and
tendrils
sugar-cane
heads

" and 1500 rjounds of leaves
bulbs 1200 * "
cucumbers
onions

14

These results are practically obtainable, have been obtained
and are not fictitious, yet in reality they are rarely obtained; not,
however, because science is wrong, but because generally, even
if the proper nitrogen supply is put into the ground, the other
conditions necessary for that surplus production are wanting.

ONE-SIDED FERTILIZATION DOES NOT PAY.

The experiments of Beseler and Maerker, as well as those of
Prof. Wagner, the latter undertaken with a view to corroborate
the former,, have given the following information: Nitrogen
only then serves as the means to produce a maximum crop, if
the stimulus it imparts to plants to grow is not checked by the
absence of those ingredients without which plants cannot grow,
namely, phosphoric acid and potash. At the same time the
propensity of nitrogen to be consumed by non-leguminous
plants is such, that if the conditions are wanting for the produc-
tion of a maximum crop, they will produce what the soil
permits, with a higher content of nitrogen. For instance, if an
oat-field contains, say forty pounds of nitrogen (by soil analysis),
and forty pounds more are put into it to obtain a more profitable
harvest, the dry substance of the harvest may be 11,500 pounds
at 0.7 per cent, of nitrogen, or only 8000 pounds at one per cent,
of nitrogen. If the farmer provided for 100 pounds of potash
(K2O), fifty pounds of phosphoric acid and twenty-five pounds
of lime, besides providing for forty pounds of nitrogen, then
the maximum crop of 11,500 pounds can be obtained, but not
otherwise. The nitrogen will be consumed, it will not remain
in the soil, it goes toward making whatever is being harvested
much richer in nitrogen, but it will and can do no more.

Given, however, the proper conditions to show its pre-emi-
nent quality in stimulating plants to grow, that is to say, given
an excess of potash and phosphoric acid in the soil, nitrogen
does not fail to perform its office. Practical experiments es-
tablish this point beyond doubt. Nor is there much diversity
of opinion among scientists as regards the value of nitrogen
fertilization; there is only diversity of opinion as to whether
nitrate of soda, sulphate of ammonia, blood, tankage, fish-scrap,
or something else, is the best form in which it should be put into

15

the ground. At all events the foremost agricultural chemist of
Germany has not hesitated to affirm, that the whole question of
the artificial fertilization of the soil turns round the one ques-
tion: wherein consists the most rational economy with nitrogen.

And he says on that subject: uSchultz-L,upitz sees in the
cheapest and most abundant securing of nitrogen, in the hus-
banding of the same, in its highest possible utilization, the
real true task and the main object of fertilization. Is this
standpoint one-sided? No." And this most emphatic de-
claration he bases first upon the fact that the leguminous
plants possess the ability to draw upon the inexhaustible supply
of nitrogen offered by nature in the atmosphere and upon the
further fact, that the nitrogen-gatherers can be made nitrogen-
hungry, that is to say, can be induced to draw much more freely
upon the inexpensive supply open to them than they do under
ordinary circumstances.

On average soils Prof. Wagner calculates the requirements of
nitrogen per acre to be for the several crops as follows:

Tor cereal crops from 13-50 Ibs. of N.— 100-400 Ibs. of nitrate of soda.
" potatoes " 22-45 " " —150-300 "

" sugar beets " 22-50 " " —150-380
*' tobacco " 13-26 " " —100-200 " "

In case of potatoes and sugar beets only nitrate of soda should
be applied, because sulphate of ammonia does not prove advan-
tageous. If it is possible at all to talk about controlling the
vegetation of plants, that control is exercised by nitrogen.
Whereas it is wise policy to mete out phosphoric acid and potash
in abundance to all crops, it is unwise to give more nitrogen
than is required for the production of a maximum crop. The
excess of phosphoric acid and potash is not lost, not consumed,
but stays in the ground, an excess of nitrogen, the most expen-
sive element, would be consumed.

THE NECESSITY OF PHOSPHORIC ACID.

Nearly all kinds of soil contain phosphoric acid, but mostly
in a form in which it is not easily taken up by the plants. Even
in soils that are very rich in phosphoric acid, the quantity which
becomes each day available for the roots of the plants is small,

16

so small in fact that it only suffices for the production of an
average crop in favorable seasons. But as really favorable
seasons are again the exception rather than the rule, the natural
supply proves generally inadequate. If it does not rain for a
fortnight the plants stop growing, because they cannot take up
phosphoric acid. When the next rain comes they are ready,
not only for the amount which the earth can give them daily,
but for a great deal more, and unless they find this "more " in
available form in the soil, the extra exertion of the plants to
make up for lost time are put forth in vain. Such contingencies
render it therefore necessary to be most liberal with phosphoric
acid; it should be given to every crop in abundance, so that a
surplus is always in the ground, because whenever plants get
abnormally hungry, as is the case after a rain following a spell
of dry weather, their abnormal appetite can only be satisfied by
such a surplus.

All agricultural chemists agree on this point, all recognize
and consequentiy advise the farmer not to be sparing with the
fertilization with phosphoric acid; first, because its presence is
indispensable for any large crop; secondly, because it is never
lost, but benefits succeeding crops.

WHEREIN CONSISTS THE POTASH
QUESTION.

After these remarks about nitrogen and phosphoric acid, the
-very important practical question arrests our attention: How
can nitrogen-gatherers be made nitrogen-hungry? and this
brings us to the potash question, a subject which during the last
•eight or ten years has forced itself upon all scientists. Prac-
tical results obtained by practical men, who, while highly
intelligent farmers, did not claim to be scientists, appeared to
•establish, a set of facts hitherto unknown. The facts were
irresistible and induced Prof. Maerker, Prof. "Wagner and others
to investigate the subject thoroughly, with a view of framing a
scientific answer to the practical answer which experience had
furnished to Schultz on his poor land in Lupitz, and to Rimpau
on the peat soil of Cunrau. As Dr. Emil Wolff, Professor in

17

the Agricultural Academy at Hohenheim remarks in the ninth
edition of his work, Practischc Diingcrlchrc: "The results of
Schultz-Lupitz and Rimpau-Cunraii are examples of a new
method of culture, which is of high importance to the whole
of Germany." He says: "Sclmltz-Lupitz has proven in a
convincing manner the great financial advantages, if the farmer,
as far as possible, manures his soil with the nitrogen of the
atmosphere. He plants leguminous plants and proper clover-
species for a crop and leaves the roots and stubbles for the
succeeding crop as fertilizer in the ground. In this way he has
succeeded, under the exclusive application of potash and phos-
phate, to raise on very poor soil exceedingly paying crops under
the following rotation:

1. Rye fertilized per hectar (i ha. = 2.47 acres) with 200

kilogram (i kg. = 2.2 Ibs.) of superphosphate at twenty
per cent. P2O5 and 600 kg. of kainit. In the stubbles
Lupins are sowed with another 600 kg. of kainit.

2. Oats.

3. Potatoes fertilized with 16,000 kg. of stable manure.

4. Peas, with 200 kg. superphosphate and 600 kg. kainit.

5. Rye, with 200 kg. superphosphate and 600 kg. kainit.

6. Clover.

The only fertilizers used were kainit and superphosphates,
and on soil that was not considered worth cultivation. Schultz
succeeded by this exclusive potash-phosphate fertilization in pro-
ducing sure crops and, what is more, paying crops."

On the peat soils of Cunrau similar results were obtained by
a very liberal application of kainit, the soil not being deficient
in nitrogen, but the difficulty consisting in getting the nitrogen
taken up by the plants. Of course, such convincing practical
results, which seemed to upset, as it were, the theories hereto-
fore entertained, induced men like Wagner to experiment
so as to ascertain the principle underlying this unexpected
phenomenon.

What is the influence of potash (kali^ upon plant-growth, was
the first point that required a thorough clearing up. But Prof.
Wagner may be allowed to tell the story in his own words:

18

PROF. WAGNER ON THE POTASH
QUESTION.

"Exceedingly little is known, even to-day, about all ques-
tions referring to potash fertilization. This plant is fertilized
with kainit, the other with muriate of potash, the third with
sulphate of potash, but without knowing which is correct.
It is not known how much the several plants can stand of
potash salts without being injured; it is not known which are
most, which are least, sensible to potash fertilization; it is not
known which plants can only with difficulty draw upon the
potash supply of the soil, and for that reason require ample
potash fertilization ; it is not known what influence potash fer-
tilization exercises upon the quality of the grain, how the other
ingredients of the potash salts affect the plants — in short, by
the results of scientific research, exceedingly little is known
about potash fertilization. ' The experience of practical farmers
has furnished until now the only material.

' ' For several years past the experiment station at Darmstadt
has undertaken to investigate some practically important ques-
tions about potash fertilization through exact experiments, and
the results obtained enable me to examine several assertions of
Schultz-Lupitz and to test them.

" I begin with the rather strange assertion of Schultz-Lupitz,
which has found much opposition, that cereals, particularly rye,
should be fertilized with potash, especially under the form
of kainit. Is not this altogether irrational? Cereals are
certainly no potash plants. While for the production of an
average crop of lucerne, potatoes, sugar beets, etc., about 150
kg. (kali) potash per hectar are necessary — the cereals are
content with about 50 kg. — is it possible, therefore, that, as
Schultz-Lupitz has found out practically, a kainit applica-
tion of 1,200 kg. per ha. for rye is not altogether irrational?

" It appears to be so, but still, on the strength of my experi-
ments, I must answer the question with an affirmative, decided
' Yes. ' First of all, I wish to call attention to the fact that a
plant which contains six times as much potash (kali) in its dry
harvest substance as another, does not require for that reason
a proportionately larger amount of potash (kali) fertilization."

19

"The requirement of plants for nutrition— as I have emphasized
already in previous publications — is by no means identical with
the requirement by way of fertilization. On the contrary, a
plant with a great demand has often a correspondingly greater
capacity to satisfy that demand than another plant which is
satisfied with much less, and does not require a correspondingly
great supply of easily assimilable nutriment as that other. A
relatively greater demand, as we perceive everywhere in
nature, is generally accompanied by a correspondingly greater
capacity for the satisfaction of that demand. Lucerne, for
instance, requires nearly four times as much nitrogen as wheat,
but for that reason the lucerne is equipped with the ability to
utilize a much richer source of nitrogen (the atmosphere) than
the wheat, which is compelled to rely for its nitrogen supply
upon the soil. And so it is with the potash (kali) question.
The capacity to take up the potash (kali) supply of the soil
and to utilize the potash (kali) so taken up differs amongst the
various plants."

" For several years, and particularly during the past summer,
I have carried out a series of potash (kali) fertilization experi-
ments in order to make this matter clear.

"In March experiments were started with summer cereals
(wheat, rye, oats and barley), peas, potatoes, red clover, sugar-
beets, vetches, lupines, summer rape, beets, partly in vegetation
vessels, partly on the field, for the purpose of answeiing the
following questions:

1. \Vhat is the potash (kali) requirement of the various
plants ?

2. To what extent can the various plants stand potash (kali)
fertilization ?

3. How does potash (kali) fertilization affect the quality of
the crop?"

" Of several pot experiments photographs were taken on June
5th, and June nth, and I have added these to the publication.
" The photographs represent:

1 . Experiments with barley, potatoes and peas in larger ves-
sels, holding 1 8 kilo earth (about 40 Ibs. [39.6] ).

2. Experiments which were made with peas, wheat, rye,
oats and barley in smaller vessels, containing 6 kilo earth
(i3^tbs. [13-22] ). (See illustrations.)

20

"The soil was:

1. A loamy soil of 0.23 per cent, potash (kali), which gives
for the larger vessels 35 gr. potash (kali) for the smaller
1 1 ^2 gr. potash (kali).

2. A light sandy soil of 0.036 per cent, potash (kali), which
makes 7^ gr. potash (kali) for the larger, 2^3 gr. potash
(kali) for the smaller vessels.

"As potash (kali) fertilization the smaller vessels received ^
gr. potash (kali), the larger ones 2 gr. potash (kali). In all
cases enough nitrogen and phosphoric acid was supplied for
the production of a maximum crop.

" The results, as far as I can briefly give them in this publi-
cation (a more extensive publication is under way) are the
following:

'i. Potash (kali) fertilization has in all cases shown decided
effects, except with potatoes (more about these potatoes-
later on).

2. On the sandy soil, poorer in potash (kali), the effect is
much more pronounced than on richer soil.

3. The potash (kali) requirement of the various plants varies -
very much. It appears most pronounced in the case of
cereals.

"These experiments confirm therefore Schultz-Lupitz's
assertion of the great importance of potash (kali) fertilization
for cereals."

PROF. WAGNER'S CONCLUSIONS.

On the strength of these experiments and the lesson they
teach, Professor Wagner proceeds to lay down in the following:
paragraphs what he feels justified in saying about potash (kali)
fertilization.

i . A high rate of advantage from potash (kali) fertilization ap-
pears most probable on light sandy soils and on peat soils.
These soils are as a rule so poor in potash (kali) that they
require a large supply of potash (kali) salts in order to pro-
duce satisfactory crops. The potash (kali) salts best adapted
for these soils are kainit and carnallite. Richer soils should

21

be carefully examined upon their potash (kali) requirements
before deciding upon regular potash (kali) fertilization;
but care is to be taken not to be deceived by the examina-
tion. How easy it is to be deceived, an example will
illustrate.

Suppose two farmers have the same soil and both deter-
mine to prove by an experiment whether the soil requires
potash (kali). Farmer A applies ninety pounds per acre
and chooses barley as the plant to* make the experiment
on. Farmer B uses the same quantity of potash (kali)
but chooses turnips. How much should the yield be in-
creased in each case? We suppose that one-half of the
potash (kali) application, that is to say forty-five pounds,
should be contained in the harvest product, and that a
supply of forty-five pounds was already in the soil. This
is easy to calculate. For the production of an average
barley crop, there are required per acre forty-five pounds,
•of potash (kali), and for the production of an average crop
of turnips about 226 pounds of potash (kali). For the barley
requirement the quantity of potash (kali) has been doubled,
but on the beet-field only J/6 has been added of what the
-crop requires. Farmer A finds the yield of barley doubled,
and considers his soil very much in need of potash (kali) ;
farmer B is hardly able to see any result, and believes his
soil does not require potash (kali). Yet, as a matter of
fact, the potash (kali) requirement of the soil is necessarily
the same, only the plant requirement differing. It became
quite evident in the one case and not so in the other.
Meadows are to be considered as pre-eminently requiring pot-
ash (kali), and as paying well fpr its application. Meadows,
as a rule, have lost much more of phosphoric acid and
potash (kali) than has been returned to them by manure,
and the yield of meadows are considerably below what
they might be if properly fertilized with phosphates and
potash (kali), as has been proven in recent years in a
final manner.

Nitrogen fertilization on meadows is unnecessary. The
meadow should not live on the nitrogen of the soil, because
it should enrich the farm by catching the nitrogen of the
air and transforming it into stable-manure nitrogen. That

22

meadows are able to do that, can be easily observed, for
nowhere does the difference between nitrogen-gatherers
and nitrogen-consumers appear more clearly. If a very
neglected meadow is fertilized with potash (kali) and phos-
phate, it will be seen how clover species and leguminous
plants, of which nothing has been visible before, will begin
to vegetate luxuriously, while the grasses will hunger and
take second place in the first year. In the second year the
grasses will also thrive luxuriously, because the legumi^
nosae have fertilized the meadow with nitrogen, that por-
tion, namely, which their roots contain, of which portions
continually decay and decompose, and which portion fur-
nishes all the nitrogen the grasses require.

In that way a farmer can take every year from 100 to 200
pounds of nitrogen per acre in shape of hay, clover, etc.,
and gain it for the farm, without supplying any nitrogen to-
the meadow. Exclusive potash (kali) phosphate fertiliza-
tion enables such a tremendous gain of nitrogen, that no
farmer should fail to avail himself of this cheap mode of
enriching his land.

The same rate of advantage which potash (kali) phosphate
fertilization promises on meadows, may of course be expected
in the culture of peas, beans, clover, etc. Under no condi-
tion should the nitrogen-gatherers be left without an ample-
supply of phosphoric acid and potash (kali), as they are
rendered thereby nitrogen-hungry; the more potash (kali)
and phosphate they can assimilate, the more greedily da
they utilize the atmosphere's nitrogen.

Just as the nitrogen-gatherers should be richly supplied with
potash (kali) and phosphate, so that they may take as much
nitrogen as possible from the air and convert it into harvest
substance, so it is also necessary to give to all nitrogen-
consumers an excess of potash (kali) and phosphate because
then alone can they utilize fully the nitrogen of the soil, of
the stable manure and of the nitrogenous fertilizers.

It is, however, not all the same in regard to cereals, as
to whether the potash (kali) is offered in shape of natural
salts, such as kainit and carnallit, or in shape of muriate or
sulphate.

23

On the strength of what is known up to to-day on that
subject I can lay down the following general principles:

(a) I consider it as suited to the purpose to fertilize with
potash (kali) not only all plants intended to be used on the
farm as food for animals, but also all cereals, which furnish
straw, in quantities not merely sufficient for the production
of a maximum crop, but with enough to induce the plants
to take up an excess of potash (kali). Animal food rich in
potash (kali) gives manure rich in potash (kali), and the
potash (kali) of the manure is for some plants most advan-
tageous.

(/>) For potatoes and sugar beets, give the potash (kali)
in form of stable manure, and apply potash (kali) to the
crop preceding or else fertilize with muriate of potash in
the fall.

(c) On loamy soils potatoes stand direct potash (kali)
fertilization better than on sandy soils.

(d) Among the cereals oats requires the least, barley
the largest quantity of potash (kali).

(e) To tobacco apply the potash (kali) only in form of
sulphate.

Wherever the conditions of soil and plants admit of the
application of the natural potash salts (kainit, carnallit,
etc.), they are to be given the preference before the con-
centrated potash (kali) salts.

The quantities of potash (kali) that should be given to the
various plants depend, of course, upon the content of pot-
ash (kali) of the soil, and its conditions.

They vary per acre from 50-120-18 , Ibs. of potash (kali)
on peat soils; (400-900-1,200 Ibs. of kainit; 100-240-360 Ibs.
of potassium chloride.)

Potash (kali) salts succeed best when applied in the fall
or during the winter. They can be spread broadcast
with the hand or with a machine, and plowed under. On
meadows the simple spreading is sufficient. If phosphates
are also applied, it is best to mix them just before use. If
the mixture stands for awhile it is apt to get hard.

Care is to be taken that the soil contains enough lime when
potash (kali) salts are richly applied. With enough lime,
sure and considerable results will not fail."

24

So far, Professor Wagner, whose injunctions do not savor of
uncertainty or hesitancy, and whose positive statements deserve
all the more credit, because they are made after a careful and
long-continued study of the nitrogen and phosphoric acid fertili-
zation.

WHAT IS THE EFFECT OF SODA.

It was during these researches that Prof. Wagner was led to
think that the potash (kali) salts possessed an effect upon plant-
growth, particularly nitrogen absorption, which had escaped
observation. It was Schultz-L<upitz who contended that not
only the potash (kali, K2O) of the kainit, but likewise the other
salts, exert a most favorable influence upon the crop. Concerning
this side- effect, as it were, Professor Wagner says that magnesia
and soda are there to be considered, the former of which is
recognized as a necessary element of plant-food, so that its
presence can, of c0urse, only be advantageous. As regards soda
(natron), however, it has been assigned so far only an indirect
influence. "This is an error," he says; "there is a direct
effect of it, and this direct effect of soda, that is to
say of soda entered into the plant, has proven during
my investigations of such importance that further researches
in that direction are of very great moment."

In his opinion, "the decided preference expressed by Schultz-
Lupitz for kainit as potash (kali) salt is, like the better yield,
produced by the use of nitrate of soda as against sulphate of
ammonia, attributable to the eifect of the soda which kainit, as
well as nitrate of soda, contains, and which, heretofore, has not
been properly valued. ' '

OPINIONS OF PROMINENT GERMAN

FARMERS ABOUT POTASH

FERTILIZATION.

What Schultz-Lupitz thinks about the potash (kali) question,
and its importance for agriculture, may be inferred from the fol-
lowing quotation from an address delivered before the Club of
the Landwirthe (farmers): " Section 4 of my resolution is to the
effect ' that the securing of the potash (kali) or kainit deposits

25

for the German agriculture should, in proper manner, be brought
about.' "

•'This point, gentlemen," so he said, "concerns, as far as I
can see, the cardinal — the main question for the future of our
German agriculture. It is recognized already on all sides that
the application of potash (kali) salts on peat soils forms the
basis of their culture; it is recognized that the application of
potash (kali) salts to stable-manure effects a preservation of the
nitrogen by preventing its escape. This has been established
through the labors and researches of Jules Reiset, Lawes and
Gilbert, E. Peters, Konig and Kiesen, Morgen, Dietzell and
others; they have proven that without the application of potash
{kali) salts the nitrogen of stable-manure, as also the nitrogen-
economy of the soil, suffers permanent, considerable losses
through the formation of free, volatile ammonia; it is beyond
doubt to-day that potash (kali) salts and, foremost among them,
kainit, are, in the hands of the farmer, the infallible means to
keep nitrogen; it is also the case that potash (kali) salts are for
the richest producers of nitrogen, the leguminosae, an exceed-
ingly suitable fertilizer, provided, of course, rain is not wanting.
In one word, the potash (kali) question is to-day no longer a mere
question of supplying to the soil potash (kali), but it is in an
eminent sense a question of nitrogen, a question how everywhere,
on each farm, this most expensive element of plant- food, this
carrier of life, can be procured and husbanded. It is my duty
to give here before you expression to my opinion, an opinion
firm and without doubt, that the potash (kali) deposits form the
foundation and future of our German agriculture."

And in an article published in No. 559 of the Magdeburger
Zcitung he writes: " I see that in the race of nations America
especially shows sharp weapons. To the virgin soil there is
added on the state institution of a homestead law, canals,
elevators, and cheap, quick and easy railway transportation.
I see that our home agriculture has to fight for life, and that if
she succumbs large circles will suffer. I see that the fight has
to be fought by us with an exhausted soil, from which our
fathers took, without knowing it, the essential elements without
replacing them. I see, by my experience of replacing them,
in the potash (kali) salts properly used, the salvation — the
main weapon for the fight which will lead us to victory and
will regenerate our soil."

26

These utterances from one who, for over ten }-ears, had
succeeded in raising profitable crops on very poor land, paying
crops against constantly decreasing prices of wheat, etc.,
acquire a great significance. They are a word of warning to
his fellow-farmers, a patriotic appeal to keep, by an act of the
government, these valuable deposits for the exclusive use of
Germany, arid an attestation that the question of fertilization
turns almost exclusively round the proper, judicious application
of potash (kali) salts. Privy Counsellor Rimpau, who, on his
domain, Cunrau, owing to the liberal use of potash (kali) salts,
had attained equally satisfactory results, had already proposed
in 1881 a large export duty on all potash (kali) products. And
yet, in spite of these overwhelming proofs as to the unques-
tionable value of the potash (kali) salts, the United States
impose upon some of these salts a duty of twenty per cent,
because they are capable of being used also for industrial
purposes! Let American farmers and American agricultur-
ists ponder over this strange legislative wisdom! Germany,
certainly a strong, great country, well governed, highly cul-
tured, and bent upon progress, considers the propriety of
preventing the export of potash (kali) salts; and the United
States, pre-eminently an agricultural country, feeling already
the absolute necessity of artificial fertilization, and having no
potash (kali) salt deposits, imposes upon them an import duty of
twenty per cent.

HOW DOES PROF, WAGNER SUM UP
THE SITUATION?

But let us sum up in a few words what the latest scientific
results, thoroughly verified by many years experience of
experienced agriculturists, have to say on the question of
proper soil nutriment. They say: In rational economy with
nitrogen lies the key to the situation, and, therefore, to use
again Professor Wagner's words, the task is quite clear, viz. :
i. All leguminous plants such as peas, beans, lupins, clover,
seradella, lentils, esparsette should be rendered nitrogen-
hungry, so that they may draw to the utmost extent upon
the nitrogen supply of the atmosphere, and this is effected
by potash (kali) phosphate fertilization.

27

2. For the nitrogen consumers the requisite amount of nitrogen

should be secured from the cheapest possible source, the
atmosphere. Extensive cultivation of leguminous plants,
fertilized by potash (kali) phosphates, and their use as
nitrogen-fertilizers effects this.

3. As far as nitrogen, procured without cost from the air does

not suffice, the nitrogen-consumers should be supplied with
the requisite amount of nitrogen, sufficient for the pro-
duction of a maximum crop. ,

4. Whatever nitrogen has been secured from the air by green

cattle food, and passes on into their manure, should be pre-
served from losses. This is effected by spreading potash
(kali) salts, containing magnesia, either in the stable or the
dunghill.

5. Whatever nitrogen has been secured to the soil by way of

stubbles, roots, etc., of leguminous plants, should also be
protected from loss, which is done by planting after fruits,
or leguminosae, for fertilization alone, properly fertilized
with potash (kali) phosphates.

6. All nitrogen furnished to the crop by the soil, by the stable

manure, or by commercial fertilizers, should be induced
to produce the highest effect, which again is effected
by liberal fertilization with potash (kali) phosphates.

7. Wherever lime is deficient, the soil should be supplied with

it, so that the potash (kali) salts may develop their whole

efficacy.

These are the theses Prof. Wagner extracted from his inves-
tigations and experiments, and they carry within themselves a
convincing power. They all aim at preservation of the most
expensive element of plant-food on one side, and on the other
at obtaining and utilizing it to the fullest extent at the least
expense to the farmer.

28

THE AMOUNT OF POTASH REMOVED
BY EACH CROP.

A glance at the quantity of potash which the crops of 1887
removed from the soil, cannot fail to be highly instructive in
this connection. The crop of 1887, as reported by the Depart-
ment of Agriculture, consisted in:
1,456,160,000 bushels of corn, and removed 189,290 tons of potash (K20)

456

,320,

ooo

II

wheat,

85

,696

659

,618,

000

II

oats, "

54

,331

20

,693,

ooo

(i

rye,

2

,860

56

,812,

ooo

II

barley, "

8

.431

10

,884,

ooo

11

buckwheat, "

618

134

,103,

ooo

II

potatoes, "

10

,045

386

,240,

ooo

pounds of

tobacco,

6

,949

41

,454,

ooo

tons of

hay, '

1,112

,011

7

,020,

209

bales of

cotton,

6

,673

In all, 1,476,904 tons of potash.

For the replacement of it no less than 11,538,281 tons of
kainit, at 12.8 K2O, would have been required. The very
alplia of farming demands the replacement of that proportion
which can in no way reach the soil, in another form, again.
The quantity of potash contained in the cereals and other
products exported is, of course, lost to the land; again, the
quantity of cereals and agricultural products consumed in the
large cities and towns find, as a rule, their way into sewers or
canals, and into the river or sea and are again lost; and what is
contained in the dropping of animals is only in a very small
way returned to the ground; therefore, it seems safe to affirm
that the replacement of at least one-tenth of what the crop
removes is absolutely necessary to prevent a gradual, but sure
impoverishment of the soil.

POTASH AND BARLEY.

Let us consider what Professor Wagner says regarding barley:
"It is practically known that barley repays much less a fertili-
zation with nitrogen than oats; it is also practically known that
fertilizing with nitrogen produces barley that is too rich in

29

nitrogen and too rich in protein; but it has not been known
how exceedingly great the requirement of barley for potash
fertilization is, and tnat barley can be forced, by sufficiently
liberal fertilization with potash and phosphoric acid, to produce
a much larger harvest of less protein in the crop-substance,
and hence much more valuable for brewing purposes." Pro-
fessor Marker's experiments, and those of Hellriegel, demon-
strate how much barley stands in need of potash fertilization.

An average crop of barley takes about fifty pounds of potash
(K,O) per acre out of the soil. Averaging the crops of 1885,
1886 and 1887, each year about 70,000 tons of potash have been
removed by the barley crops of the United States. Provided
phosphoric acid and potash (kali) had been furnished in sufficient
quantities, the barley crops on the area in barley could have
been doubled.

Barley, the most grateful of all cereals for liberal kainit sup-
ply, was planted in the—

Year 1885 on 2,729,359 acres, yielding 58,360,000 bushels.
41 1886 on 2,652,957 " 59,428,000 "

" 1887 on 2,901,953 " 56,812,000

Now there were imported according to the Report of the
Department of Agriculture, in —

1885 — 9,986,507 bushels, at a cost of $7,177,889.
1886—10,197,115 6,173,208.

1887—10,831,461 " " 8,076,082.

Now by referring to what Professor Wagner says, namelyr
that the yield of barley per acre can be easily doubled by giving
it a proper fertilization with potash and phosphate, namely 300
pounds of kainit per acre or a ton for 7 acres, the aggregate cost
of this proper potash fertilization would have amounted to about
400, ooo tons of kainit, costing, freight included, about £3, 000,000.
The result calculated at only one-third of what might reasonably
be expected, would have represented according to the figures of
the Report of the Department of Agriculture $9,821,463, be-
cause the crop instead of being only 56,000,000 bushels, would
have amounted to 74,000,000 bushels. The money spent for
foreign barley would have remained in the country, and the
farmer would have been better off by the difference between the

30

cost of the potash and the increased value of the crop, some
$6,000,000.

This is but one out of many instances that might be given as
to what might be done by proper rational fertilization

NEVER USE POTASH ALONE.

The success of the various potash salts, as fertilizers, depends
upon their proper application. They should never be used
alone, because they only furnish one important element of plant
food ; the full effect of potash fertilization is only obtained
in connection with a proper supply of phosphoric acid and
nitrogen.

In a general way practice and experience has established the
following rules for their use : On low, peat soils, rich in nitrogen,
the application of nitrogen is unnecessary, and also when the
nitrogen has been supplied by green manuring; that is to say,
by planting peas, etc., and inducing them, by a liberal supply
of potash and phosphates, to an increased absorption of nitrogen
from the air, and ploughing them under. Except in these two
cases nitrogen should always be with the potash and phosphates
supplied to the soil.

The potash salts act, to some extent, as a solvent upon the
phosphates, and the use of Thomas slag has proven particularly
successful in connection with potash.

In soils deficient in lime it is quite essential, when applying
potash, to give them also the requisite amount of lime.

Potash salts should never be applied as a top dressing; they
should be applied as early in the Fall as possible and worked
into the ground by deep ploughing.

31

THE VARIOUS POTASH SALTS AND
THEIR COMPOSITION.

ANA LYS E S

OF THB

RAW-PRODUCTS — MANUFACTURED ARTICLES

OF THE

GERMAN KALI WORKS.

A. NATURAL PRODUCTS

OF THE MINES.

4

0
CO

•Q

M

cj
*

O

CO
be

S

N

CJ
M

S

U

rt
X

<4

O

CO
CJ

Insoluble
in water.

Water.

O
W*

Salts neutral-
izing am'nia

Kainit

21 . ^

2 .O

ii . ?

12.4 "14 6 T T

0.8

12 7 TO R oft A

Carnallite ....

•• «o

* vi ~~r • ^

IS- 5 12.1

1 *• ' H OH • ^J
21 ^ 22 4

I Q

r> c

1 * • /
26.1

98 7^ C

Kieserite . . .

o o.

I I . S 2 I . C

• * • O H
17 2 26 7

* ' V ~-u

0.8 T i

2O 7

•°|OO -o

•T c •><-» e

(a
Svlriuite - />
It

7-i
17.2

16-3

24.7
ii. i
14.0

5-8
ii. 8

ii. 8

A / • * *w • /
4.046.2
8.138.2
9-334-9

'•9

3-6
3-6

• ' O

I.9
0-3

1.8

***• / / • o

8.419.4

9-7(16.3
8.317-6

o^-o
II-7

23-5
24-7

B. CONCENTRATED

PRODUCTS.

a. Sulphates of Potash.

i. Sulphate of potash, high-

graded 96%

07.2

o. \

O.7

O 4

O.2

o •*

O. 2

O 7

C2 7

2. Sulphate of potash, high-

71 *

**• O

V. /

vs.«t

w • o

w. /

O-* ' /

graded 9O%

QD 6

1.6

27

I .0

I . 2

0,1

O 1

2 2

AO Q

3. Double sulphate of pot-

\}j.\j

• /

• *f

w»J

49'9

ash and sulphate of

magnesia (double ma-

nure salt)

50.4 ....

34-o

....

2-5

0.9 0.6

1 1. 6 27.2

34-9

4. Calcined kieserite

....

65-8

—

0.9

6-5 15-7

ii. i

72-3

b. Muriates of Potash.

( 90/95%

91.7

0.2

0.2

7-1

0.2

0.6

57. Q

Muriate of potash -j 80/85^

"::83.5

0.4

o-3

14-5

....

0.2

1.152.7

( 70/75 #

1.7

72-5 0.8

0.6 21.2

0.2

0-5

2.546.7

Calcined manure salt, high

44-5
25-6

22.5
3I-I

4.6
6-3

12.4

10.3

2-9

3-5

5-3
10.6

7.8

12.6

28.1
16.2

30.0
40.6

Calcined manure salt, low
grade

i

-

32

The various potash salts are not entirely equal in their action
upon different soils and different plants. The following rules are
given as a general guide for their proper selection :

NATURAL PRODUCTS OF THE MINES.

KAINIT.— Is a natural product of the mine, reduced to a
powder for the purpose of facilitating the even distribution. It
contains the potash in form of sulphates and chlorides, which
are mixed with the chlorides and sulphates of sodium and mag-
nesium. These companions of the potash proper are quite valu-
able as disintegrators upon the soil constituents. For tobacto no-
crude salts should be used, because the presence of chlorides
reduces the combustibility of tobacco and impairs therefore the
quality of the leaf. Kainit is most valuable in light, sandy soils,
and also in peat soils. It has a tendency to keep the soil moist
and make it more compact. Whilst this property is very desirable
in light, sandy soils, it is not desirable in heavy clay soils, where
the concentrated salts are to be preferred. Kainit benefits all
kinds of crops, particularly the cereals, potatoes, beets, cabbages,
peas and beans, clover, etc. With flax and hemp it produces
not only larger crops, but also a superior fibre.

The amount to be applied depends of course upon the quality
of the soil, as a rule from 300 to 800 pounds per acre may be
considered the right quantity. On low peat soils not less than
700 pounds per acre should be applied. The Fall is the best
time to put the kainii into the ground. For potatoes and sugar
beets, which requir! a large amount of potash, it should be
applied to the ground on the preceding crop, and an additional
amount early in the Fall. Kainit should be always well ploughed
under, as otherwise the potash salts remain on the surface, and
are not so easily accessible to the lower roots of the plants.
Upon meadows and clover fields the effect of kainit is most
excellent. The use of from 350 to 550 pounds, with from 175 to-
350 pounds of phosphates, will increase the quality as well as
quantity of the crop. If this mixture is used on sour meadows,
with proper drainage, and if necessary with an application of
lime, the effect is most decided. . The unwholesome grasses will

33

disappear and be replaced by more nutritious and palatable
grasses and herbs.

For the preservation of nitrogen, and humus substances in
stable manure, kainit is highly to be recommended. By the
action of the magnesium salts in kainit the nitrogen of the
manure is retained, which would otherwise escape in the form
of ammonia and be entirely lost.

CARNALLITE is the principal raw product from which the
concentrated articles are manufactured. It is not imported in
this country for manuring purposes.

KIESERITE AND SYLVINITE. Kieserite has been
imported for sometime; sylvinite has only lately been intro-
duced. Both are valuable as manure preservers, also as potash
fertilizers. Sylvinite contains more potash (kali) than kainit ;
kieserite contains less. Their application and effect is similar
to that of kainit.

MANUFACTURED ARTICLES— CONCEN-
TRATED POTASH SALTS.

The Concentrated Potash Salts contain from four to five
times as much potash as the crude salts. The great saving
in the cost of their transportation is obvious, and where the
•effect of potash alone is wanted, they deserve the preference
over the crude salts.

SULPHATES OF POTASH. On heavy soils the sulphates
are preferable. They are best adapted for tobacco, on account of
the absence of chlorine; also for the production of sugar and
starch in plants, like sugar-beets and potatoes and sugar-cane.
From 150 to 300 Ibs. per acre will suffice for most soils. They
should be applied in the Fall or Winter and ploughed under.

SULPHATE OF POTASH (KALI) AND MAGNESIA
{DOUBLED MANURE SALT).— Is in its effect similar to the
sulphate. It is also very valuable as a manure preserver, and
produces manure free from chlorides. Hence the manure treated
with this salt forms an excellent tobacco fertilizer. If mixed
with other fertilizer ingredients, it brings these into a better

34

mechanical condition for spreading over the field. From 175 to
525 pounds per acre should fye used.

CALCINED KIESERITE is valuable for its contents of
magnesia, acting as dissolving agent and manure preserver.

MURIATE OF POTASH is the richest of any of the potash
salts, and the most soluble. It may be used with all crops,
except tobacco, etc., and has proven of great advantage with
all cereals, with rape, peas and beans, beets, asparagus, cabbage,
etc. It should be applied in the Fall in quantities of 175 to 350
pounds per acre. It is not efficient however as a manure pre-
server.

CALCINED POTASH (KALI SALTS.. (MANURE
SALTS.) In composition and effect upon the plant they are
quite similar to kainit, and they should be used in the same
manner. They are however richer in potash (kali) than kainit,
hence may be used in smaller quantities. The proper application
per acre is 250 to 500 Ibs. of the low grade (15 % potash— kali),
and 175 to 400 Ibs. of the high grade (20 % potash — kali.) As
manure preservers they are valuable, and the low grade has the
preference above the high grade salts for this purpose.

NO FERTILIZER CAN GUARANTEE A CROP.

Elementary causes of failure of crops can never be done
away with, as long as neither heat nor cold, nor rain, snow,
wind and hail are under man's control. Failures arising from
such causes, and failures arising from self-deception, by neglect-
ing to observe carefully all the injunctions of science, do not
invalidate the favorable results that can be obtained, and are
obtained, whenever no array of adverse circumstances combine
against them. No fertiliser can guarantee a crop, nor should
any farmer expect it. All that science can do is to lay down
the conditions, under the strict observance of which favorable
results and paying crops may be looked forward to.

The practical questions with what ingredients and in what
amounts should the ground be fertilized to insure paying crops
are, by the very nature of the case, the most difficult to answer.
For a correct answer depends first upon the fertilizer-require-

35

ments of the several plants; secondly, upon the condition of
fertility of the soil, and the latter is an exceedingly variable

quantity.

PROF. STUTZER'S ADVICE REGARDING
ARTIFICIAL FERTILIZATION.

\Vhat is stated hereafter are those quantities which, by reason
of scientific investigation and practical experience, have been
found to be average quantities; it remains with the farmer to
judge in each special case how far he can deviate from them.
Dr. A. Stutzer's work, crowned with a prize by an interna-
tional commission of the most prominent agricultural scien-
tists forms the basis of the subjoined practical instructions.

(A) Cereals.

Amongst all plants this class repays in an eminent degree
proper fertilization. Nitrate of soda is for this class the
most advantageous form of nitrogen.

Low fertilization oo Ibs. nitrate of soda per acre.

Medium " 180 " " " "

High 350 "

Low 200 " acid phos. (14^ avail, ph. acid) per A.

Medium " 350 " " " " "

High 550 " " " " "

Low 200 " kainit at 12/50^ K2O per acre.

Medium " 350 " " " " "

High 550 "

For barley and rye the quantity of nitrogen may be decreased
and those for potash (kali) should be increased.

On humid, heavy soil, decrease nitrogen and increase phos-
phoric acid.

On dry, light, warm soil, decrease phosphoric acid and increase
nitrogen.

If the soil is rich on nitrogen, or if trie preceding crop con-
sisted in a nitrogen gatherer, the nitrogen should be decreased.

36

(B) Leguminous Plants.

No nitrogen, except in some cases a slight top dressing with
nitrate of soda, but phosphoric acid and potash (kali) in abund-
ance. Therefore for all leguminous plants, clover species, etc. :
From joo to 400 Ibs. of acid phosphate at 14% available phos-
phoric acid per acre; 500 to 600 Ibs. of kainit at 12^ % K2O per
acre. These quantities are very apt to secure a very paying
result.

(C) Tobacco, per acre.

250 pounds acid phosphate at 14% available phosphoric acid.
150 pounds sulph. of potash (kali) at about 50 # K2O.
125 pounds nitrate of soda.

(D) Hemp, etc., per acre.

250-275 Ibs. of acid phosphate at 14% available.
125-250 Ibs. of nitrate of soda.
350-500 Ibs. of kainit.

Fleischmann and Nessler emphasize the good effect of kainit
upon these crops.

(E) Potatoes, beets, etc.

This class of plants require very large amounts of potash
(kali), yet direct fertilization with potash (kali) salts is not
advantageous. It should be put into the ground with the pre-
ceding crop, and only phosphoric acid and nitrogen be directly
applied.

For potatoes apply 125-250 Ibs. nitrate of soda,

100-200 Ibs. 14% acid phospate,

nearly the same quantity for beets, only for these more phos-
phoric acid.

(F) Meadoivs.

Apply from 600-700 Ibs. of kainit at i2I/>% K2O.

250-350 Ibs. acid phosphate at 14% avail.
These figures were given by Dr. Stutzer before the peculiar
effect of the potash (kali) salts had been known, and compared

37

with what has been said before on that subject, an increase in
potash (kali) appears in all cases as only advisable.

EXPERIENCE WITH POTASH IN THE
UNITED STATES.

It would be erroneous to believe that the value of potash has
been recognized only on the other side. The experiments made
at the various experiment stations here bear out the assertions
of the German Agricultural Chemists on that subject. So we
read, for instance, in the bulletins issued by the experiment
station in Kentucky, "That the results of the experiments
regarding potash are so marked as to strongly indicate that for
corn, potash is the fertilizer needed on the soil of the experi-
ment station," and the report continues to say, "that this holds
true also for potatoes, that the results on hemp and tobacco
prove the same to apply to these crops, and that there are strong
indications that wheat will likewise be benefitted by the appli-
cation of potash. Therefore," it continues to say, "it would
seem that the soils of like character in the Blue Grass region
would be benefitted by potash fertilizers."

Very striking results have been obtained in the State of New
Jersey by the use of potash salts.

In the Second Annual Report of Texas Agricultural Experi-
ment Station, we read on page 80, "Of the fertilizers, kainit
has proved the most beneficial. Many correspondents in other
cotton States mention kainit as valuable in keeping cotton root-
rot in check."

But of singular importance appears also what Dr. Dabney, as
Director of the North Carolina Experiment Station, wrote as
long ago as 1882 with reference to kainit. A comparison of
what he says on that subject, with what Prof. Wagner has more
recently established, proves conclusively, that the investigations
carried on by Dr. Dabney corroborate in full those of Prof.
Wagner. Referring to what Schultz and Rimpau had accom-
plished by rational potash fertilization, Dr. Dabney says: "A
large portion of all the South Atlantic States are covered with
just such lands, while nearly all the arable land in the eastern
portions of these States are exactly of the same character which

38

we find to be so wonderfully improved by Schultz-Lupitz plan.
With the aid of potash salts what prevents us from making all
these waste places blossom all over with fruitfulness ? ' '

These prophetic utterances are evidence that years ago the
great value of kainit was correctly recognized in this country
by Dr. Dabney. We refer the reader to the Report of the North
Carolina Station for 1882 for the testimony the farmers them-
selves offer on that subject. Dr. Dabney also recognized at
that early day, that the action of kainit consists not only in sup-
plying potash where potash is needed, but has also an indirect
effect through the agency of the secondary salts present. To
quote from that report, he says: "As far as our experience
goes, kainit appears to be the most effective agent which has
ever been used against that destructive and mysterious disease
in cotton which we call "rust" or "blight". It is Dr. Dabney
likewise who advised the planting of peas fertilized with kainit
/or the permanent improvement of the soil. He says, "ammo-
niated super-phosphates, that is to say, complete guano, proved
upon peas a failure, even worse than a failure, a permanent
injury in some cases, whereas kainit is the manure particularly
fitted to make good pea crops. ' ' This confirms again what Prof.
Wagner states regarding the enrichment of the soil by cultivat-
ing luguminous plants properly fertilized with kainit and phos-
phates. For this reason did Dr. Dabney call kainit a God-send
to the farmer, and he also discovered the high value of the
magnesia contained in kainit, advised its use instead of plaster,
and observed the effect of the potash salts to render the phos-
phates and nitrogen more available to the plants.

In view of these irresistable facts it would seem that the
work done by the North Carolina Station in 1882 foreshadows
what the German scientists of a more recent date have done.

List of Works Quoted From.

Practische Dungcrlchrc. Dr. Emil Wolff, nth ed. Berlin, 1889.
Anlcitung zu cincr rationcllcn Dtingung mit Phospliorsihirc. Prof.

Dr. Paul Wagner. Darmstadt, 1889.
Die Steigcrung dcr Bodcncrtriigc durcJi rationcllc Stickstoff-Diln-

gung. Prof. Dr. Paul Wagner. Darmstadt, 1889.
Znr Kali-PhospJiat D tingling nnch ScJudtz-Lupitz. Prof. Dr.

Paul Wagner. Darmstadt, 1890.

Die Kali-Diingung auf IcicJitcn Bodcn. Schultz-LupiU. Ber-
lin, 1884.
Vortriige tibcr Kalidtingnng it ml Sttigcntng dcr ttodcncrtriigc im

Club dcr Landwirthe. Berlin, 1883.
Practisclie Dihigctafcln. Iv Lierke. Berlin, 1887.
Untcrsuclinngcii ilbcr die Stickstoffw'Hiruug dcr Gramincn und

Legnminoscn. Prof. H. Hellriegel and Dr. H. Wilfarth.

Berlin, 1888.
Der Chilisal peter, prcisgckr<»ite ScJirift i'on Dr. A. Stutzcr,

bcarbcitcd "con Prof. Dr. Paul Wagner. Berlin, 1886.
Die BciuirtJiscliaftung dcs Rittergittcs Citnrait. T. H. Rimpau.

Berlin, 1887.
Die Thatigkcit dcr Ccntral-Moor-Counnission nach amtlichcn

Protocollcn. Dr. Fleischer. Berlin, 1882.
AscJien-Analyscn. Dr. Kmil Wolff, i TJicil. Berlin, 1870.
Aschcn-Analyscn. Dr. Emil Wolff. 2 tcr Thcil. Berlin, 1880.
Einigc praktiscli wichtigc Dilngnugsfragcn von Prof. Dr. Paul

\Vagner. Darmstadt, 1885.
Die Kali Salze und Hire Anwcndung in der Lanwdirtschaft von

Dr. Max Marker. Berlin, 1880.

Without Potash. With % g. Potash.

PEAS ON POOR SOIL.

(See page 19.)

41

Without Potash. With # g. Potash.

PEAS ON RICH SOIL.

(See page 19.)

Without Potash. With % g. Potash.

OATS OK POOR SOIL.

(See page 19.)

43

Without Potash. With % g. Potash.

OATS ON RICH SOIL.

(Sec page ; 9.)

44

Without Potash. With # g. Potash.

RYE ON POOR SOIL.

(See page 19.)

45

Without Potash. With % g. Potash.

RYE ON RICH SOIL.

(Sec page 19.)

46

Without Potash. With 2 g. Potash.

BARLEY ON POOR SOU,.

(See page 19.)

Without Potash. With 2 g. Potash,

BARLEY ON RICH SOIL.

(See page 19.)

Without Potash. With # g. Potash.

BARLEY ON AVERAGE SOIL.

(See page 19.)

Without
Potash.

With 3/ g.
Potash.

With g.
Potash.

With \2 g.
Potash.

BARLEY WITH POTASH INCREASED.

(See page 19.)

INDEX.

Page.

Introduction ^

Agricultural Science and its Main Objects 5

Artificial Fertilization 6-

What is Plant Growth ? 7

Wherein Consists Rational Fertilization 7

The Requirements of Nutrition and Fertilization are not the same 8

Plant-Growth 8

Nitrogen Consumers and Nitrogen Gatherers 9

Nitrogen Regulates Plant-Growth 1 1

Table showing how many pounds of the constituents mentioned are withdrawn per

acre by an average crop 12

One-sided Fertilization does not pay I4

The Necessity of Phosphoric Acid — I5

Wherein Consists the Potash Question 16

Prof. Wagner on the Potash Question 18

Prof. Wagner's Conclusions 20

What is the Effect of Soda ? 24

Prominent German Farmers on Potash Fertilization 24

How does Prof. Wagner sum up the Situation ? 26

The Amount of Potash removed by each Crop 28

Potash and Barley 28

Never Use Potash Alone 30

The Various Potash Salts and Their Composition 31

Natural Products of the Mines 32

Kainit 32

Carnallite 33

Kieserite and Sylvinite • 33

Manufactured Articles— Concentrated Potash Salts 33

Sulphate of Potash 33

Sulphate of Potash (Kali) and Magnesia (Double Manure Salts 33

Calcined Kieserite 33

Muriate of Potash 33

Calcined Potash (Kali) Salts (Manure Salts) 34

No Fertilizer Can Guarantee a Crop 34

Prof. Stutzer's Advice Regarding Artificial Fertilization 34

Experience with Potash in the United States 36

lyist of Works Quoted From 39

Illustrations :

Peas on Poor Soil 40

" Rich " 41

Oats Poor " , 42

Rich " 43

Rye Poor " '. « — 44

" Rich " 45

Barley Poor " 46

'* Rich '* o 46

" Average Soil <,..•.•. e, 47

" with Potash Increased ,.roi-.H.,«»73»ct 47

yp

I U

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY