UCSB //' THE PRACTICAL SHEPHERD A COMPLETE TREATISE ON THE BREEDING, MANAGEMENT AND DISEASES OF SHEEP. HENRY S. RANDALL, LL. D., inEEP HUSBANDRY IN THE SOUTH," "TINE-WOOL SHEEP HUSBANDBY," ETC., ETC. WITH rL3L,TJSTK,A.TIONS. SIXTH EDITION. ROCHESTER, N. Y.: D. D. T. MOORE, UNION BUILDINGS. PHILADELPHIA: J. B. LIPPESTCOTT & CO. 1863. ft ITT IT £ 3 11 t 5 3 11 4 6K1 0 3 9 2 2 10 4 3 4 0% These weights and measures, except those of the American sheep, are Austrian. The Austrian pound is equal to 1.037 pounds avoirdupois; the Austrian foot to 1.234 English feet. The fleece of the Spanish Merino was level on the surface and so dense that, like that of its American descendant, it opposed a firm resistance when grasped by the hand, instead of yielding under the fingers like fur, hair, or the thin wool of other races of sheep. The wool was shorter than that of the improved American Merino and particularly so on the belly, legs and head. It was very even in quality, both as between diiferent sheep and on different parts of the same sheep. The most celebrated flocks, with. the exception of the Escurial, were dark colored externally — about as dark as the present Merino sheep in our own Middle and Western States, which are not housed in summer. The wool was rendered moist to * They were taken from my flock, and the measurements, &c., made in December. 1861. The ewes were a little over average size, but the ram was quite small. His usual weight immediately after shearing is but 100 pounds. 1 selected him more particularly to exhibit another contrast, with the Spanish Sheep. His unwashed fleece of a single year's growth has reached 21 Ibs. and averages about 20 Ibs. "21 per cent.," as he is called, was bred by Edwin Hammond, Esq., of Middlebury, Yt. 16 6PANISH WOOL. the feel, brilliant and heavy, by yolk, but it did not exhibit this in viscid or indurated masses within, or in a black, pitchy coating without. It opened with a fine, flashing luster, and with a yellowish tinge which deepened toward its outer ends. Livingston gives the weight of the unwashed Spanish fleeces at 8£ Ibs. in the ram and 5 Ibs. in the ewe. Youatt places the weight of the ram's fleece half a pound lower. The King of England's flock of Negretti's^ about one hundred in number, which were picked sheep and included some wethers (but no rams,) yielded, during five years, an annual average of a little over 3£ Ibs. of brook -washed wool per head, and each fleece afterwards lost about a pound in scouring.* Youatt measured the diameter of the wool of the various flocks first introduced from Spain into England. I judge from his statements that 1-750 part of an inch maybe assumed as about the average diameter or fineness of the good Spanish wool of that period. The same ingenious investigator discovered that conformation of the fibers which causes the felting property. It is produced by "serrations," as he terms them, — tooth-like projections on the wool, all pointing in a direction from the root to the point, and so inconceivably minute that 2560 of them occur in the space of an inch of the fiber. They are more numerous in proportion to the fineness of the wool, and on their number, regularity and sharpness depends the perfection of the felting property. In this respect the finest grades of Merino wool exceed all others. The following cuts give the magnified appearance of a fine specimen of Spanish wool, viewed both as an opaque and transparent object. These tooth-like processes are still finer on choice speci' mens of Saxon wool ; on that of the coarse-wooled varieties of sheep they are comparatively few, blunt and irregular. The best flocks of Spain, as already mentioned, were lost to that country during the Peninsular war. In answer to an application for information from T. S. Humrickhouse, Esq., of ^ IM:I>I:NT SPANISH MERINOS. 17 Ohio, made with a view to importations and directed to the Spanish Minister in Washington, in 1852, that functionary caused inquiry to be made in relation to the existing condition of the flocks of Spain. The statements sent back, in 1854, appear to have been derived from the Spanish "General Association of Wool Growers." The substance of them is condensed into the following paragraph : "Although it is certain that, in the war of Independence, a great number of the said flocks, [the choice Transhumantes of Estremadura and Leon, such as the Infantado, Paular, Guadeloupe, Negretti, Escurial, Montarco, etc.,] were de- stroyed, and others diminished and divided, it is equally certain that they still exist in their majority and with the same good qualities which formerly made them so desirable and necessary. If, therefore, as it appears from the commu- nication which has given rise to this report, the wool growers of the United States should have a desire and want to purchase fine sheep, they may come sure they will not be disappointed." Then follows an extended list of flocks with the names of their owners.* The Escurial, the Negretti and the Arriza, are the only ones admitted to have been lost. Conceding to these statements the merit of entire candor, they simply show that the Spaniards place a very different estimate on their present sheep from that placed on them by American breeders. The late John A. Taintor, Esq., o, Connecticut, who seven times visited Europe to buy sheepf carefully examined the flocks of Spain with an earnest wish to find superior animals in them for importation to the United States. He wrote to me in 1862, that the Spanish sheep " were so small, neglected and miserable, that he would not take one of them as a present."! In 1860 a gentleman of Estremadura, whose flock Mr. Taintor could not visit when in Spain, sent him a number of fleeces as samples; and one of these Mr. Taintor forwarded to me. It weighed, in the dirt, 5 Ibs. 11 oz. The wool was about as long as ordinary American Merino wool, was not very even in quality, and was scarcely middling in point of fineness! Mr. William Chamberlain, of Red Hook,- New York, the well known * Scarcely any of these are the ancient owners, or those -who held the flocks •when the war " of Independence " commenced. t See his letter to me in my Report on Fine-Wool Husbandry in Transactions of N. Y. State Agricultural Society for 1861. (The Report was made early in 1862 and will hereafter be cited as of that year.) 18 THE FRENCH MERINO. importer of Silesian Merinos, informs me that he imported about thirty Merinos from Spain, a few years since, and that after seeing them and shearing them he quietly sold them in the ensuing autumn to the butcher! William R. Sanford, of Orwell, Vermont, a Merino sheep breeder of great judgment and experience, visited the flocks of Spain, France and Germany, in 1851, in behalf of himself, Mr. Hammond and some other gentlemen of the same State, to ascertain whether fine-wooled sheep superior to those of the United States could be found in Europe. He thus wrote to me in respect to the sheep of Spain: * * * « On arriving at Madrid I found that most of those who owned sheep to any amount lived in the city, and through our Minister I got introductions to them. From what I could learn from them in regard to the form, weight of fleece, etc., of their sheep, I became satisfied that they had none of much value. They finally admitted that they were not as good as formerly, and that they were going to Germany for bucks to improve them. I concluded, however, I would go and see for myself. It is about 200 miles from Madrid to the plains of Estremadura, where they winter their sheep. On examining the flocks, I found they had no fixed character. Occasionally there would be a fair looking sheep. At first they pretended that their sheep were pure and the best in the world. But when they found that I understood the history of their flocks, and what I wanted, they admitted they were not as good as the former ones, and they gave as a reason that they had no standard flocks to resort to as they had before the French invasion, — at which time those standard flocks were all broken up, those which were not eaten, being sold and mixed with the common sheep of the country, which were a very inferior kind. I did not see a sheep in Spain that I would pay freight on to this country. I do not believe they have any that are of pure blood." I have conversed with several other American sheep breeders who have visited the Spanish flocks within the last fifteen years, and all of them substantially concur in the opinions above expressed. THE FRENCH MERINO. — After several successful smaller experiments in acclimating the Spanish Merino in France, about 300 of them were imported under royal auspices to that country in 1786. Gilbert, a French writer of reputation, in a THE FRENCH MERINO. 19 report made to the National Institute of France, ten years afterwards, thus speaks of them : "The stock from which the flock of Rambouillet was derived, was composed of individuals beautiful beyond any that had ever before been brought from Spain; but having been chosen from a great number of flocks, in different parts of the kingdom, they were distinguished by very striking local differences, which formed a medley disagreeable to the eye, but immaterial as it affected their quality. These characteristic differences have melted into each other, by their successive alliances, and from thence has resulted a race which perhaps resembles none of those which composed the primitive stock, but which certainly does not yield in any circumstance to the most beautiful in point of size, form and strength, or in the fineness, length, softness, strength and abundance of fleece. * * * The comparison I have made with the most scrupulous attention, between this wool and the highest priced of that drawn from Spain, authorizes me to declare that of Rambouillet superior." Lasteyrie thus gives their weight of fleeces, unwashed, through a series of years: — In 1796, 6 Ibs. 9 oz.; 1797, 8 Ibs.; 1793, 7 Ibs.; 1799, 8 Ibs.; 1800, 8 Ibs.; 1801, 9 Ibs. 1 oz. In 1802, he says: — "The medium weight of full grown nursing ewes' fleece's was 8 Ibs. 7 oz.; of the ewes of three years old, which had no lambs, 9 Ibs. 13 oz.; and two-tenths [grade] ewes, 10 Ibs. 8 oz." Mr. Trimmer, an English flock-master and writer of ex- perience, thus described them in 1827 : " The sheep, in size, are certainly the largest pure Merinos I have ever seen. The wo6l is of various qualities, many sheep carrying very fine fleeces, others middling, and some rather indifferent ; but the whole is much improved from the quality of the original Spanish Merinos. In carcass and appearance I hesitate not to say they are the most unsightly flock of the kind I ever met with. The Spaniards entertained an opinion that a looseness of skin under the throat, and other parts, contributed to the increase of fleece. This system the French have so much enlarged on that they have produced, in this flock, individuals with dewlaps almost down to the knees, and folds of skin on the neck, like frills, covering nearly the head. Several of these animals seem to possess pelts of such looseness of size that one skin would nearly hold the carcasses of two such sheep. The pelts are particularly thick, which is unusual in the Merino sheep. The rams' fleeces were stated THE SAXON MEEINO. at 14 Ibs., and the ewes' 10 Ibs., in the grease. By washing they would be reduced half, thus giving 7 and 5 Ibs. each. But the royal flock was already beginning to be out- stripped by private ones in size of carcass and weight of fleece, and now there are a very few choice flocks in France which are said to average 14 Ibs. of unwashed wool to the fleece in ewes, and from 20 Ibs. to 24 Ibs. in rams, the ewes weighing 150 Ibs. and the rams 200 Ibs. THE SAXON MERINO.— In 1765, three hundred Merinos were introduced from Spain into Saxony. They, too, were a royal importation, and were placed in government establish- ments. It is understood they were selected principally if not exclusively from the Escurial cabana. The course of breeding and management generally adopted in that country tended to develop a very high quality of wool at the expense of its quantity and at the expense of both car- cass and constitution. The sheep were not only housed during the winter, but at night, during all rainy weather, and generally from the noonday sun in summer. They were not even allowed to run on wet grass. Their food was accurately portioned out to them in quantity and in varying courses; their stable arrangements were systematic and included a multitude of careful manipulations; at yeaning time they received (and came to require) about as much care as human patients. When introduced into the United States (1824,) the Saxon lacked from a fifth to a quarter of the weight of the parent Spanish stock in the country, and the latter were materially smaller then than now. Their forms indicated a far feebler constitution than those of the Spanish sheep. They were slimmer, finer boned, taller in proportion, and thinner in the head and neck, — and shorter, thinner, finer and evener in the fleece. The wool had no hardened yolk internally or externally; was white externally; and opened white instead of having the buff tinge of the unwashed Spanish wool. It was from an inch to an inch and a half long on the back and sides and shorter on the head, legs and belly. Medium specimens of it measured about 1-840 parts of an inch in diameter. The washed fleeces on an average weighed from 1J Ibs. to 2 Ibs. in ewes, and from 2 Ibs. to 3 Ibs. in rams. There has been a regeneration and improvement of this variety in various parts of Germany, but an account of these changes would possess little interest for the mass of practical American breeders. THE SILESIAN MERINO. 21 THE SILESIAN MERINO. — Prussian Silesia has numerous flocks of sheep descended from the Electoral and other Saxon flocks. These require no separate mention here. An impor- tation of a different family of Merinos has been made from that country to the United States, and they have acquired, here, the distinctive appellation of Silesian Merinos. These will be described when an account is given of the importations of foreign fine-wooled sheep into the United States. ^w Ry.M. ta New Tork ASriculttlral Society's Trans- | See his letter to me on this subject in 1844, published that year in the Albany Cultivator and New York Agriculturist. § Mr. Jarvis gives the facts more precisely in a letter to L. A. Morrell, published in in goo SAXON MERINOS INTRODUCED. 25 . SAXON MERINOS INTRODUCED. — The woolen tariff enacted in 1824, gave a new impulse to the production of fine-wool, and during that and the four succeeding years Saxon Merinos were imported in large numbers into the United States. A detailed history of these importations was embodied in a report on sheep which I made to the New York State Agricultural Society in 1838,* the facts in regard to the Saxons being furnished to me by another member of the committee, Henry D. Grove, the leading German importer and breeder of that variety of sheep in our country. That history having been republished in the "American Shepherd," in "Sheep Husbandry in the South," and in various other publications, it is scarcely necessary to take up space here with its curious particulars concerning a variety now pretty generally discarded in our country. Suffice it to say, that the most enormous frauds were practiced; grade sheep were mixed with nearly every importation; and these miserable animals brought along with them scab and hoof-rot, those dire Bcourges of the ovine race. The great discrimination made in favor of fine-wool by the tariff of 1828, excited a mania for its production, and every producer strove to obtain the finest, almost regardless of every other consideration. Size, weight of fleece, and constitution were totally overlooked. Yet the grower was feeding on hope. Fine-wool did not rise to a high price until after the middle of 1830, and neither then nor at any subse- quent period did the average price of Saxon exceed that of Spanish wool by more than ten cents a pound — while at least a third more of the latter could be obtained from the same number of sheep,f or the same amount of feed. When we consider this fact, and consider the superiority of the Spanish sheep in every other particular except fineness of wool, we cannot sufficiently wonder that from 1824 to 1840 the Saxons should have received universal preference, have sold for vastly higher prices, and that those who owned Spanish sheep, should have in almost every instance made haste to cross them with their small and comparatively worthless competitors. In about 1840, however, a reaction commenced, and the tariff of 1846, (which established an even ad valorem duty of * Published in Albany Cultivator, March, 1838, and partially in the New York State Agricultural Society's Transactions, 1841. tMr. Grove's flock of picked breeding sheep — not excelled probably in the United States among pure bloods, for weight of fleece — yielded an average of 2 Ibs. It oz. per head of washed wool in 1840, and he published this product as a proof of the superior value of his favorite variety. See his letter to me, Transactions New York State Agricultural Society, 1841, p. 333. 2 gg SAXON MEKINOS INTRODUCED. 30 per centum on all wools and on cloths,) completed the overthrow of the Saxons. SAXON EAM. The cut of the Saxon ram above given, is copied from an engraving from a drawing by Mr. Charles L. Fleischmann, formerly draughtsman for the Patent Office. The engraving was published in the Patent Office Report of 1847. Mr. Fleischmann states that it is an accurate representation of the best ram of Von Thaer (son of the celebrated Albert Von Thaer,) made by its owner's pel-mission at Moeglin, in 1844- '45. The flocks of Von Thaer are among the best and most highly improved in Germany. The drawing was made in the beginning of the month of August while the fleece was yet short. CHAPTER III. AMEEIOAN MEBINOS ESTABLISHED AS A VAEIETY, THE MIXED LEONESE OR JARVIS MERINOS THE INFANTADO OR ATWOOD MERINOS — THE PAULAR OR RICH MERINOS OTHER MERINOS. THE MIXED LEONESE OR JARVIS MERINOS. — The origin of Mr. Jarvis' flock has been given. Their pedigrees rested on his own direct statements ; and his integrity and veracity were never challenged by friend or foe. As has been seen, he mixed five families of Spanish sheep, the Paulars considerably predominating in numbers, — but his son writes me that for the purpose of "accommodating the manufacturers" he bred " in the contrary direction " from the type of the darker colored and yolkier families.* The appearance of his sheep when I first saw them, something over twenty years since, I thought plainly indicated that he had "accommodated the manufacturers " by chiefly using rams of his Escurial family or which bore a large proportion of that blood. They were lighter colored than the original Spanish sheep of other families and their wool was finer. It was entirely free from hardened yolk, or "gum," internally and externally, and opened on a rosy skin with a style and brilliancy which resembled the Saxon. It was longish, for those times, on the. back and sides, but shorter on the belly, and did not cover the head and legs anything like as well as those parts are covered in the improved sheep of the present day. It was of fair medium thickness on the best animals. The form was perhaps rather more compact than that of the original Spanish sheep, but altogether it bore a close resemblance to them. I think that pi-ior to 1840, Mr. Jarvis had begun to breed back toward the other strains of blood in his flock. At about that period small and choice lots of breeding ewes were * See Charles Jarvis' letter to me in my report on " Fine- Wool Sheep Husbandry," 28 THE AMERICAN INFANTADOS. occasionally obtained from him which yielded from 4 Ibs. to 4£ Ibs of washed wool per head. These sheep long enjoyed ereat celebrity, and are now represented in the pedigree^ of many excellent pure bred flocks; but as a distinct family, they have mostly been merged in the two next to be described. THE INFANTADO OK ATWOOD MERINO. — In 1813, Stephen Atwood. of Woodbury, Connecticut, bought a ewe of Col. David Humphreys for $120. He bred this ewe and her descendants to rams in his neighborhood which he knew to be of pure Humphreys' blood, until about 1830, after which period he uniformly used rams from his own flock. This is the distinct and positive statement of a man of conceded good character, and has been persisted in from a period long before the asserted facts would have had any effect on the reputation of his flock. From 1815 to 1824, and indeed down to a much later period, the pedigrees of "old-fashioned Merinos," as they were then termed, received very little respect or attention ; and, in fact, I am not aware that Mr. Humphreys' importation enjoyed any especial credit over several other of the principal importations, until its reputation was reflected back on it by Mr. Atwood's own flock. Mr. Atwood, moreover, is a purely practical man ; has been specially and almost exclusively devoted to his sheep ; and has always acted as his own shepherd. We have no right, then, to doubt either his sincerity or his accuracy. In 1840, his sheep were not far from the size and form of Mr. Jarvis' — though I think they were inclined to be a little flatter in the ribs, and perhaps a little deeper chested. Their wool was short, fine, even, well crimped, brilliant, generally thick, and very dark colored externally for that day. Some of them (particularly among the rams,) had a black external .coat of hardened yolk, which was sticky in warm weather and formed a stiff crust in cold weather. The inside yolk was abundant, and generally colorless. The wool was still shorter on the belly, and as with the Jarvis sheep, did not very well cover the legs and head. Few of them had any below the knees and hocks. Their skins were mellow, loose and of a rich pink color. The rams had a pendulous dew-lap and some of them neck-folds, or "wrinkles," of moderate size. They rarely exhibited them on other parts of the body, and the "broad tail" and deep pendulous flank of the present day, were unknown in both sexes. The ewes generally had dew-laps of greater or lesser width, sometimes dividing into THE IMPROVED INFANTADOS. 29 two parts under the jaw, so as to form a triangular cavity or "pouch" between; and there was on most of them a horizontal fold of skin running across the lower portion of the bosom or front of the brisket, — which was known as "the cross," and which modern breeders have developed into that pendulous mass now sometimes termed "the apron." When the Spanish Merinos came again into credit, this flock became a public favorite and colonies from it were rapidly scattered throughout the United States, and particu- larly in the State of New York. Some of these deteriorated, but most of them continued to improve. The great and leading improver of the family has been Edwin Hammond, of Middlebury, Vermont. He made three considerable purchases of Mr. Atwood's sheep between the beginning of 1844 and the close of 1846 — in the two last, getting the average of the flock, i. e., a proportionate number of each quality.* By a perfect understanding and exquisite management of his materials, this great breeder has effected quite as marked an improvement in the American Merino, as Mr. Bakewell effected among the long-wooled sheep of England. He has converted the thin, light-boned, smallish, and imperfectly covered sheep above described, into large, round, low, strong- boned sheep — models of compactness, and not a few of them almost perfect models of beauty, for fine-wooled sheep. I examined the flock nearly a week in February, 1863. They were in very high condition, though the ewes were fed only hay. Two of these weighed about 140 Ibs. each. Numbers would have reached from 110 Ibs. to 125 Ibs. One of the two largest ewes had yielded a fleece of 17} Ibs., and the other 14 $ Ibs. of unwashed wool. The whole flock, usually about 200 in number, with the due proportion of young and old and including, say, two per cent, of grown rams, and no wethers, yields an average of about 10 Ibs. of unwashed wool per head. The ram, "Sweepstakes," given as the frontispiece of this volume, bred and now owned by Mr. Hammond, has yielded a single year's fleece of unwashed wool weighing 27 Ibs: His weight in full fleece is about 140 Ibs. Rams producing from 20 Ibs. to 24 Ibs. are not unusual in the flock. Mr. Hammond's sheep exhibit no hardened yolk within the wool and but little externally : in nearly all of them the curves of the wool can be traced to its outer tips. They are * In one case he bought the entire lot of ewe lambs of a year ; in another, one-third of the old ewes— Mr. Atwood selecting the first and third, and Mr. Hammond the Becond of each trio. He had partners in some of his purchases, but there is no occasion to name them here. 30 THE AMERICAN PAULAKS. dark colored because they have abundance of liquid " circu- lating " yolk, and because they (like all the leading breeding flocks of Vermont,) are housed, not only in winter, but from Bummer rain storms. The great weight is made up not by the extra amount of yolk, but by the extra length and thickness of every part of the fleece. In many instances it is nearly as long and thick on the belly, legs,* forehead, cheeks, etc., as on the back and sides. The wool opens freely and with a good luster and style. It is of a high medium quality and remarkably even. Mr. Hammond is intentionally breeding it back to the buff tinge of the original Spanish wool. He has not specially cultivated folds in the skin. Sweepstakes has more of these than most of his predecessors and has much increased them in the flock. Some of his best ewes are nearly without them, though all perhaps have dew-laps and the "cross" on the brisket. In every respect this eminent breeder has directed his whole attention to solid value, and has never sacrificed a particle of it to attain either points of no value or of less value. He has bred exclusively from Mr. Atwood's stock, sire and dam; and since the rams originally purchased of Mr. Atwood by himself and associates, has only used rams of his own flock. The marked extent of his in-and-in breeding, will be adverted to in the Chapter which I shall devote to the general subject of in-and-in breeding. But this has not developed any delicacy of constitution in his flock. They are every way stronger and more robust sheep than their predecessors of 25 years ago, bring forth larger and stronger lambs, and are far better breeders and nui*ses. There are in Vermont and other States a large body of spirited and intelligent breeders whose flocks were founded mainly or exclusively on sheep purchased of Mr. Hammond. Not a few of them have bred with distinguished success. It would be justly considered invidious to mention the flocks of a portion of them, without mentioning all of equal merit. This I am unable to do, both because I am unprovided with a full list of them, and because the prescribed limits of this work do not admit of it. I have aimed to do justice to all of this improved family of sheep at once, in describing the flock of its distinguished founder. THE PAULAB OB RICH MEEINOS. — These sheep were originally purchased in 1823, by Hon. Charles Rich, M. C., * I do not mean to be understood that it is thus lone below the knees and hocks, though it is generally quite as long as it ought to be on the shanks. THE AMERICAN PAULARS. 31 and Leonard Bedell, of Shoreham, Vermont, of Andrew Cock, of Flushing, Long Island. Cock purchased all of the original stock and part of the individual sheep sold to them, of the importers. Their Spanish pedigree, the authenticity of which MEKINO EWE. was attested by a Consular certificate, (undoubtedly Mr. Jarvis', but that fact is not now remembered,) showed them to be Paulars.* They have been bred by John T. Rich, son of the preceding, and his sons John T. and Virtulan Rich, on the old * Cock delivered this certified pedigree to Bedell. Letters of the late John T. Rich, Esq., son of one of the purchasers, and of the late Hon. S. H. Jennison, ex-Governor or Vermont, were published in 1844, stating that they had seen this document; and both gentlemen remembered the ewes in the flock certified to be of the original importation. Gov. Jennison says he saw them often between 18SM and 1830. They were very old and toothless. The Hon. Effingham Lawrence, who resided in the same town with Cock, and who was himself a distinguished importer and breeder of Merinos, as well as an old-school gentleman, highly eminent for social position and integrity, wrote to me in 1844: — "Andrew Cock * * was my near neighbor. We were intimate and commenced laying the foundations of our Merino flocks about the same time. I was present when he purchased most of his sheep, which was in 1811. He first purchased two ewes at $1,100 per head. They were very fine, and of the Escurial flock imported by Richard Crowninshield. His next purchase was 30 of the Paular breed at from $50 to $100 per head. He continued to purchase of the different importations until he run them up to about eighty, always selecting them with great care. This was the foundation of A. Cock's flock, nor did he ever purchase any but pure blooded sheep to my knowledge or belief. Andrew Cock was an attentive breeder ; saw well to his business; and was of unimpeachable character. His certificate of the kind and purity of blood I should implicitly rely on. I recollect of his selling sheep to Leonard Bedell, of Vermont." Much other testimony sustaining the pedigree might be given. 32 THE IMPROVED PAULARS. homestead in Shoreham, down to the present day, without the least admixture of other blood than pure Spanish, and with very little crossing with other Spanish or American families. These sheep, in 1840, were heavy, short -legged, broad animals, full in the quarters, strong-boned, with thick, short necks and thick coarse heads. The ewes had deep and some- times plaited dew-laps and folds of moderate size about the neck. The rams had larger ones. They were darker exter- nally than the Jarvis sheep, but not so much so as the Atwood sheep — indicating that their wool contained more yolk than the former and less than the latter. The wool was longer than that of either of the other families, very thick and covered them better on the belly, legs and head. But it was inferior in fineness, evenness and style. It was quite coarse on the thigh, and hairs were occasionally seen on the neck folds. The lambs were often covered with hair when yeaned, and their legs and ears were marked by patches of tan color which subsequently disappeared except on the ears, where it continued to show faintly. They were better nurses and hardier than either of the other families. I have remarked in a former publication that "they were precisely the negligent farmer's sheep." They encountered short keep, careless treat- ment of all kinds, exposure to autumnal storms and winter gales, with a degree of impunity which was unexampled. Their lambs came big, bony and strong, and did not suifer much if they were dropped in a snow bank. In 1842 and 1843 this flock was bred to a Jarvis ram — peculiarly dark, thick and heavy fleeced and compact in form for one of ^ his family— the object of Mr. Rich being to avoid breeding in-and-in and to improve the quality of his wool. For the same object, and to increase the yolkness of the wool, a dip or two of Atwood blood has been since taken; but it has always been made a point to breed back after taking these crosses, so as essentially to preserve the blood and distinctive characteristics of the original family. The Messrs. Rich have succeeded in all these objects and have kept up well with the rapid current of modern improvement. Their sheep are not so large nor do they yield so much wool per head as the improved Infantados, but they possess symmetrical forms which are remarkable for compactness. The body is shortish, and very thick, with their ancient good fore and hind quarters ; and their heads, though thick and short, have lost their coarse- ness. Their fleeces are even and good. But that merit which gives them their great popularity in Vermont and elsewhere, OTHEE MERINO FAMILIES. 33 is their adaptation to thin, scant herbage, and to their qualities as "working flocks." They demand no extra care or keep to develop their qualities, are always lively and alert; and though gentle and perfectly free from restlessness of tempera- ment, they are ready to rove far and near to obtain their food. And for all they consume they make the most ample returns. While they will pay for care, they will thrive with but little care. In a word, they remain, par excellence, the negligent farmer's sheep. The ewe, the .portrait of which is given on page 31, is a three year old of this family, and is one of a small number of equal appearance and excellence, which I bought of the Messrs. Rich a year since. Her second fleece, when she was not so large as a high-kept yearling, and when she had not been housed before autumn, weighed 10 Ibs. unwashed. Having bred both these and the Infantados for years, and being now about equally interested in both the improved families, I trust I can speak of them with impartiality; and I may here add that I also described Mr. Jarvis' sheep on ample personal OTHER MERIXO FAMILIES. — There were in 184,0, a few small Merino flocks descended from pure Spanish importations, and derived from other sources than the foregoing, scattered very thinly through the States lying west of New England. Like the best Infantados and Paulars of that day, some of them averaged about 4J Ibs. of washed wool to the fleece. I have been unable to obtain any authentic portraits of known Infantados or Paulars of that period. The drawing from which the cut given on the following page was taken, was made in 1 840, by Francis Rotch, Esq., of Morris, (then called Louisville,) N. Y., one of the most eminent and skillful cattle and sheep breeders in the United States, and remarkable then as since for the accuracy and spirit of his drawings of animals. The cut is a ewe of his own flock of thirty breeding ewes, which had been selected with much care from difierent flocks in New England ; and this one was then regarded as a model. She is rounder in the rib, broader and rounder in the thigh and fuller in the brisket than was common among the Merinos of that day. The illustration will show the changes which * The account which I have given of the characteristics, &c., of these families 20 years ago, was submitted, in substantially the same form, to some of the most prominent present breeders of each variety, including Mr. Hammond and Mr. Rich, preparatory to its publication in my Report on Fine- Wool Husbandry in 1862, and it received their unanimous concurrence. See that Report, p. 53. 2* 34 OTHEB MEBLNO FAMILIES. have taken place in American Merino sheep during the last twenty -three years. MERINO EWE. Other persons in New York, (including myself,) and several in Pennsylvania, Ohio, and perhaps some other States, owned pure Spanish flocks, not differing essentially in quality from those of Connecticut and Vermont. But while some flock-masters in New England, and particularly in Vermont, made ram breeding a specialty, those of the Middle and Western States generally devoted their attention to wool- growing, and soon began to draw their rams from the former sources. The consequence has been that they neither preserved nor established distinct families, among their early sheep ; and those that now have pure and distinct families ol the improved American Merinos (and their number greatly exceeds that of the breeders of pure sheep in New England,) have generally obtained the origin of their flocks, within the last fifteen or twenty years, from Vermont, or from Mr. Atwood's flock in Connecticut. Consequently, there is not within my knowledge any other separate families that require a special description. CHAPTER IV. LATER IMPORTATIONS OF FINE-WOOLED SHEEP INTO THE UNITED STATES. FRENCH AND SILESIAN MERINOS INTRODUCED. FRENCH MERINOS INTRODUCED. — The first importation of French Merinos into the United States, since they have assumed those characteristics which constitute them a separate variety, was made in 1840, by D. C. Collins, of Hartford, Conn. He purchased fourteen ewes and two rams from the royal flock at Rambouillet, which were esteemed of such choice quality that one of the rams (" Grandee") and several of the ewes " could only be procured after they had been used in the national flock as far as it could be done with advantage." Grandee, says A. B. Allen, then Editor of the American Agri- culturist, who attended Mr. Collins' sheep-shearing in 1843, was 3 feet 8j inches long from the setting on of the horns to the end of the rump ; his height over the rump and shoulders was 2 feet 5 inches, and his weight in good fair condition about 150 Ibs. The ewes were proportionably large. At three years old, in France, Grandee produced a fleece of 14 Ibs. of unwashed wool. His fleece was suffered to grow from 1839 to 1841, two years, and weighed 26 Ibs. 3 oz. clean unwashed wool. One year's fleece in 1842 weighed 12f Ibs. In 1843 the ewes yielded an average of 6 Ibs. 9 oz. of unwashed wool. Mr. Allen commended their constitutions and longevity ; stated that they had large loose skins full of folds, especially about the neck and below it on the shoulders, and not unfrequently over the whole body; and that they were well covered with wool on every part down to the hoofs. Their fleeces opened of a brilliant creamy color, on a skin of rich pink, and was soft, glossy, wavy, and very even over the whole body. It was exceedingly close and compact, and had a yolk free from gum and easily liberated by washing.* * See Am. Agriculturist, vol. 2, p. 98. I mostly use Mr. Allen's language. FRENCH MERINOS INTRODUCED. The late Mr. Taintor, of Hartford, Connecticut, commenced importing French Merinos in 1846, and continued it through several succeeding years. He selected mostly from private flocks like those of M. Cughnot and M. Gilbert, which had been bred much larger and heavier fleeced than the royal one. Having made some inquiries of him, in 1862, in relation to the sheep of his importations, he referred me to John D. Patterson of Westfield, New York, who had purchased very extensively of him and who owned as good animals as had ever been imported. That gentleman wrote to me : " In answer to your inquiry as to the weight of fleece of the French sheep and their live weight, I can only reply by giving the result of my own flock. My French rams have generally sheared from 18 to 24 pounds of an even year's growth, and unwashed, but some of them, with high keeping and light use, have sheared more, and my yearling rams have generally sheared from 15 to 22 pounds each. My breeding and yearling ewes have never averaged as low as 15 pounds each, unwashed, taking the entire flock. Some of them have sheared over 20 pounds each, but these were exceptions, being large and in high condition. The live weight of any animal of course depends very much upon its condition. My yearling ewes usually range from 90 to 130 pounds each, and the grown ewes from 130 to 170 pounds each, and I have had some that weighed over 200 pounds each ; but these would be above the average size and in high flesh. My yearling rams usually weigh from 120 to 180 pounds each, and my grown rams from 180 to 250 pounds each — some of them have weighed over 300 pounds each, but these were unusually large and in high flesh and in full fleece. I have had ram lambs weigh 120 pounds at seven months old, but they were more thrifty, fleshy and larger than usual at that age." I have seen many sheep of Mr. Taintor's importation and their direct descendants. - A large portion of them possessed good forms considering their great size. Their wool was not so fine as Mr. Collins', but of a fair medium quality and pretty even. Their fleeces were very light colored externally, com- pared with those of any American family, owing undoubtedly to their relative deficiency in yolk and to the more soluble character of their yolk. Unless housed with care from both summer and winter storms, they were about as destitute of yolk before washing as a considerable class of American Merinos are after it. Under common treatment, then, their fleeces are greatly lighter in proportion to bulk than those of FRENCH MERINOS. 37 the latter, and correspondingly unprofitable in a market where no adequate discrimination is made between clean and dirty wools. " The only really weak point of the best French Merino as a pure wool producing animal, is the want of that hardiness which adapts it to our changeable climate and to our systems of husbandry. In this particular it is to the American Merino what the great pampered Short-Horn of England is to the little, hardy, black cattle of the Scotch Highlands — what the high-fed carriage horse, sixteen hands high, groomed and attended in a wainscoted stable, is to the Sheltie that feeds among the moors and mosses, and defies the tempests of the Orkneys. The French sheep has not only been highly kept and housed from storm and rain and dew for generations, but it has been bred aAvay from the normal type of its race. The Dishley sheep of Mr. Bakewell are not a more artificial variety, and all highly artificial varieties become comparatively delicate in constitution."* The French Merino, if well selected, has always proved profitable in this country, where the French, or an equally fostering system of management, has been faithfully kept up — but by far the largest portion of buyers-have not kept up such a system, and consequently their sheep have rapidly deterio- rated. Where the rams have been worked hard and exposed to rough vicissitudes of weather, they have frequently perished before the close' of the first year. These facts account for that reaction which has taken place against this variety in the minds of many of our farmers. And the tide of prejudice has been enormously swelled by the impositions of a class of importers. It creates a smile to recall to memory the great, gaunt, shaggy monsters, with hair on their necks and thighs projecting three or four inches beyond the wool — mongrels probably of the second or third cross between French Merinos and some long-wooled and huge-bodied variety of mutton sheep — which were picked up in France and hawked about this country by greedy speculators, who knew that, at that time, size and " wrinkles" would sell any thing ! I regret that Mr. Patterson's absence in California has prevented me from obtaining original drawings of some of *I quote this paragraph from my Report on Fine -Wool Husbandry, 1862, because Mr. Taintor, the Messrs. Allen, and several other distinguished breeders and advocates of French Sheep, wrote to me expressing their entire satisfaction with my description of that breed in the Report; and the above quotation may therefore be set down as res adjudicata. 38 SILESIAN MERINOS INTRODUCED. these sheep in time for this volume. I have not known where else to look for pure and favorable specimens of the variety. Colonies of French Sheep have been planted in the mild climate of the South, in California, and in other situations the most favorable to them. I cannot but hope that they will yet acclimatize into a valuable variety for portions of OUT country. They are good mothers. They often raise twins. As a fine-wool mutton sheep they should stand unrivaled. SILESIAN MERINO BAM. INTRODUCTION or SILESIAN MERINOS.— The following account of the introduction of this variety and of its charac^ tenstics, is contained in a letter from the principal importer, William Chamberlain, of Red Hook, New York. He wrote to me m January, 1862: "Your favor dated 24th ult. is received, and it gives me pleasure to furnish the required information in regard to my flock of Silesian sheep, with full liberty to make such use of the facts as you please. SILESIAN MERINOS. 39 " 1st. I have made importations for myself and George Campbell of Silesian sheep, as follows : In the year 1851, say 40 ewes and 15 bucks. do. 1863, do 27 do. 4 do. do. 1854, do Ill do. 13 do. do. 1856, do 34 do. 2 do. 212 34 do. "In 1854 I visited Silesia and made the purchases myself. " 2d. The sheep were bred by Louis Fischer, of Wirchen- blatt, Silesia, except a few which were bred by his near neighbor, Baron Weidebach, who used Fischer's breeders. "3d. Their origin is Spain. In 1811 Ferdinand Fischer, the father of Louis Fischer, the present owner of the flock, visited Spain himself and purchased one hundred of the best ewes he could find of the Infantado flocks, and four bucks from the Negretti flock, and took them home with him to Silesia, and up to the present day they have not been crossed with any other flocks or blood, but they have been crossed within the families. The mode pursued is to number every sheep and give the same number to all her increase ; an exact record is kept in books, and thus Mr. Fischer is enabled to give the pedigree of every sheep he owns, running back to 1811, which is positive proof of their entire purity of blood. The sheep are perhaps not as large as they would be if a little other blood were infused ; but Mr. F. claims that entire purity of blood is indispensably necessary to insure uniformity of improvement when crossed on ordinary wool growers' flocks ; and such' is the general opinion of wool growers in Germany, Poland and Russia, which enables Mr. Fischer to sell at high prices as many bucks and ewes as he can spare, . and as he and his father have enjoyed this reputation for so many years, I am fully of opinion that he is right. From these facts you will observe that my sheep are pure Spanish. "4th. Medium aged ewes shear from 8 to 11 pounds; bucks from 12 to 16 pounds; but in regard to ewes, it must be borne in mind that they drop their lambs from November to February, which lightens the clip somewhat. I do not wash my sheep. " oth. I have sold my clip from 30 to 45 cents, according to the market. " 6th. We have measured the wool on quite a number of sheep, and find it from one and a half to two inches long, say eight months' growth, but I have no means of knowing what it would be at twelve months' growth. 40 SILESIAN MERINOS. " 7th. Their external color is dark. The wool has oil but no gum whatever, they haying been bred so as to make them entirely free from gum — German manufacturers always insist- ing on large deductions in the price of wool where gum is found. " 8th. As above stated, the Silesians have oil, but no gum like those which are sold for Spanish and French, and the oil is white and free; the wool does not stick together. " 9th. We have weighed five CAVCS. Three dropped their lambs last month ; the other two have not yet come in. Their Aveights are 115, 140, 130, 115 and 127 pounds; three bucks weighing severally 145, 158, 155 pounds; one yearling buck weighing 130 pounds; but this would be more than an average weight of my flock when young and very old sheep were brought into the average. My sheep are only in fair condition, as I feed no grain. They have beets, which I consider very 'good for milk, but not so good for flesh as grain. "10th and llth. For the first time my shepherd has measured some sheep : ewes from 24 to 28 inches high, fore- leg 11 to 12 inches ; bucks, 27 to 28 inches high, fore-leg 12 to 13 £ inches. " 12th. We find the Silesians hardy, much more so than a small flock of coarse mutton sheep that I keep and treat quite as well as I do the Silesians. " 13th. They are first-rate breeders and nurses. " Some of these facts I have given on the statement of my shepherd, CarlHeyne, who was one of Mr. Fischer's shepherds, and came home with the sheep I purchased in 1854, and a man whose honor and integrity I can fully indorse. " My sheep do not deteriorate in this country, but the wool rather grows finer without any reduction in the weight of fleece." In a subsequent letter Mr. Chamberlain wrote to me : ;' Carl has weighed a few more of our Silesian sheep, and their weights are as follows: Four full aged ewes, respect- ively, 120, 125, 107, 107 pounds; two ewe lambs, 90, 87 pounds ; two two-year old bucks, 124, 122 pounds ; one three- fourths blood, 143 pounds. " I attended to the weighing and selection myself, and am of opinion that our ewes from three to eight years old averno-e fully 115 pounds, say before dropping their lambs. Our younger sheep do not weigh as much. Silesians do not get their full size till four years of age, and after eight or nine SILESIAN MERINOS. 41 years they are not as heavy. * * * Mr. Fischer's sheep are large, say larger than any flock of Vermont Merinos that I have seen. * * * I have the lambs come from November to March, because Carl says it is the best way, and I let him do as he pleases. * * * The ewes do not give r' ' 3 as much wool, but I think the lambs make stronger p, as they get a good start the first summer." The Silesian ram, a portrait of which is given on page 38, was bred by Mr. Chamberlain, and is now the property of James Geddes, of Fairmount, N. Y. He is regarded as an extraordinarily valuable animal of the family. He is large in size and yields an unusually heavy fleece. The following cut represents a group of Silesian ewes imported by Mr. Chamberlain. GROUP OF SILESIAN EAVES. I visited Mr. Chamberlain's flock in February, 1863. Most of the lambs were then dropped and the ewes appeared to be excellent mothers. They were fed beets but no grain. They are housed constantly in cold weather, except when let out to drink — housed nights throughout the year, and from all summer rain storms. From the limited quantity of his available pasturage, Mr. Chamberlain restricts them far more than is usual in that particular in summer, but allows them to 42 SILESIAN MERINOS. eat what hay they wish at night. He considers this more profitable than devoting more of his high-priced lands to pasturage, and quite as well if not better for the sheep. The carcasses of his sheep are rftund and symmetrical. Some of them are taller in proportion to weight than is desirable — because German breeders pay less attention to this' point — but this tendency could be readily changed without going out of the flock for rams. The wool is of admirable quality and uniformity, and opens most brilliantly on a mellow, rose-colored skin. The fleece is very dark externally. Wherever it is most profitable to grow very fine wool, this variety, or rather this family, ought to stand unrivaled. Whether they have ever been tested under the common rough usage of our country I am not advised. There is nothing in their forms or general appearance to indicate that they would not generally conform to it. They would doubtless lose much of their external color and early maturity, and perhaps something of their ultimate size. But the same would be true of all the summer-housed, high kept and carefully tended Merinos of our country. CHAPTER V. BEITISH AND OTHEK LONG AND MIDDLE - WO OLED SHEEP IN THE UNITED STATES. LEICESTEES, COTSWOLDS, LINCOLNS, NEW OXFORDSHIRES, BLACK-PACED SCOTCH, CHEVIOT, FAT-RUMPED, BROAD-TAILED, PERSIAN AND CHINESE SHEEP. No breed of domestic sheep were indigenous to the United States ; nor is it deemed necessary here to attempt to trace the origin or subsequent history of the various breeds and families, imported by our ancestors when they colonized this Continent, and which, being mixed promiscuously together, constituted what it became customary to speak of as the " Native Sheep," when the Merino and the improved British breeds were afterwards introduced. They were generally lank, gaunt, slow -feeding, coarse, short-wooled, hardy, prolific animals — not well adapted to any special purpose of wool or mutton production. A family of them, the Otter Sheep — so termed from their short, crooked, rickety legs, a mere perpetuated monstrosity — and the descendants of some English long-wools, on Smith's Island, imagined by a few persons to be indigenous there — are the only sub-varieties which have ever attracted special notice ; and they were wholly unworthy of it. Not having bred English sheep of late years, and never having bred them extensively, I can entertain little doubt that I shall give more satisfaction to the readers" of this volume if I select descriptions of them from British and American sources of recognized authority. THE LEICESTER SHEEP.* — It is with profound pleasure that I am enabled to trace the first probable importation into the * I leave off the prefix " New," because these sheep have altogether superseded the parent stock, so as to be generally denominated " the Leicester." And they are so denominated in the prize lists of the Royal Agricultural Society of England. 44 LEICESTEKS INTRODUCED. United States of improved English Sheep, if not of improved sheep of any kind, to that great man, first in the arts of peace as well as war, GEORGE WASHINGTON. Livingston, writing in 1809, says of the " Arlington Long-Wooled Sheep" that they were " derived from the stock" of General Washington — being bred by his step-son, Mr. Custis, from a Persian ram and BaJcewett ewes. Gen. Washington died near the close of 1799.* A Mr. Lax, who resided on Long Island, "smuggled" some Leicesters into the United States not far from 1810; and from these Christopher Dunn, of Albany, New York, obtained the origin of his long celebrated flock.f During the war of 1812 with England, some choice Leicesters, on their way to Canada, were captured by one of our privateers, and sold at auction in New York, and thus became scattered throughout the country. Some sheep of this family were also early introduced by Captain Beanes, of New Jersey. J The elaborate descriptions of the Leicesters, by Youatt and Spooncr, have been made so familiar to American readers, that I shall use that of Mr. John Wilson, Professor of Agri- culture in the University of Edinburgh, in a paper " On the Various Breeds of Sheep in Great Britain," published in the Journal of the Royal Agricultural Society of England, in 1856: * Livingston (see his Essay on Sheep, p. 58,) does not expressly say that Gen. Washington introduced the " Bakewells," but this is to be inferred from his state- ment that the Arlington Sheep "were derived from his stock," without making an exception of the Bakewells. Mr. Livingston speaks of the Arlington's as an existing family, when he wrote. I have not Mr. Custis's pamphlet before me from which he appears to have derived his facts. t He commenced crossing it with a CotswoJd ram in 1832, and from that period it became a grade flock between the two families. -But it was an excellent one. His wethers weighed 35 Ibs. per quarter and carried 8 Ibs. of wool per head. His first Cotswold ram weighed alive 250 Ibs., and yielded at one shearing 15K Ibs. of wool 14 inches long. In 1835 he sold ewes from $12 to $15 a head, and rams from $30 to $50 a head Several eminent flocks in the vicinity, like those of Mr. Duane and Mr. North, S\™ t vne(r,a y-< K &c-> originated from these. I have obtained most of my facts about Mr. Dunn s sheep from a communication signed B. in the Albany Cultivator, rcn laSo It was undoubtedly written by Caleb N. Bement— entirely reliable authority ; but whoever wrote the article, Judge Buell, then editor of the Cultivator, who was perfectly conversant with Mr. Dunn and his flock, would not have pnbli-hr.l any erroneous statements in regard to either; and had any errors crept into his columns by ovors,sht. he would have promptly corrected them* f n« • "'ilh?m H- •50tham, m a communication to the Cultivator in 1840, states the following facts of six wethers bred and fed by Mr. Dunn that year. The heaviest weighed 210 Ibs. and the fat on the ribs measured 5tf inches. The thickness of fat on the smallest was 4% inches They were sold to Mr. Kirkpatrick for $22 a head, and abouTTo f Ita ! each1nyweighet.market *" ™V> C6DtS a pOUnd' The fleeCCS averaged es also introduced Te«swaters and South Downs, but they were not ct from the surrounding varieties and families. It has been said that W6re mcluded amonS the 8heeP captured, as above stated, by a priva- LEICESTER SHEEP. 45 LEICESTER RAM. " It was about the middle of the last century when Mr. Bakewell, of Dishley, in Leicestershire, began his experiments in the improvement of the breed of long-wooled sheep, at that time common to the midland counties. The old Leicesters were then considered as possessing many valuable properties ; at the same time they possessed many defects. These defects Bakewell sought by a judicious crossing with other breeds to remedy, while at the same time he retained the good points of the original breed. Up to this period the great object of breeders seems to have been confined to the production of animals of the largest size possible, and carrying the heaviest fleece. The old Leicesters are described as large, heavy, coarse-grained animals, the meat having but little flavor and no delicacy — the carcass was long and thin, flat- sided, with large bones on thick rough legs. The fleece was heavy and long, and of coarse quality. The sheep were slow feeders, and when sent to market at two and three years old, weighed about 100 to 120 Ibs. each. Such were the charac- teristics of the stock upon which Bakewell commenced his improved system of breeding. Recognizing the relation 46 LEICESTER SHEEP. which exists between the form of an animal and its physical tendencies, he sought to cross his sheep with such breeds as he considered would be most likely to insure those points in the animal frame which were defective in the old breed, and thus to introduce an aptitude to lay on the largest possible amount both of flesh and fat in the shortest space of time, and at the least expenditure of food. The fleece too was not- forgotten, as that would necessarily share in the general improvement of the animal. * * * * * * "In order to obtain a permanent character to his breed, after he had by continued crossing secured all those points he considered desirable, Bakewell carried on his breeding with his own blood, and did not scruple to use animals closely allied to each other. This system, adhered to more or less during a course of years by his successors and by later breeders, while sustaining the purity of the breed, had the effect of lessening its value to the -farmer. It gradually exhibited a weakened constitution, became reduced in size and more delicate in form — the ewes were less prolific and less generous to their offspring. These prominent and serious defects soon craved the attention of enlightened breeders, who, by a judicious introduction of new blood, have again restored the original character of the breed, with all the improvements resulting from the advanced system of cultivation and the enlarged area of sheep farming of the present day. "The New Leicester is now perhaps the most widely extended and most numerous of all our native breeds. The sheep are without horns, with white faces and legs ; the head small and clean ; the eye bright ; neck and shoulders square and deep ; back straight, with deep carcass ; hind quarters tapering toward the tail and somewhat deficient when com- pared with the Cotswold sheep ; legs clean, with fine bone. The flesh is juicy but of moderate quality, and is remarkable for the proportion of outside fat it carries. "They are not considered so hardy as the other large breeds, and require shelter and good keep. The ewes are neither very prolific nor good mothers, and the young lambs require great attention. Early maturity and aptitude for fattening are the principal characteristics of the breed ; a large proportion of the wethers finding their way to market at twelve or fifteen months old, and weighing from 80 to 100 Ibs. each ; at two years old they average 120 to 150 Ibs. each. The wool is a valuable portion of the flock, the fleeces averaging 7 Ibs. each. LEICESTER SHEEP. "The occasional introduction of a little Cotswold blood into a Leicester flock has the effect of improving both the consti- tution of the animal and also the hind quarters, in which the Leicester is somewhat defective. Ram-breeding is carried out to a much larger extent with this breed than with any other. ovtaoff.scjtar. LEICESTER EWE. The accompanying cuts are from drawings of a pair of Leicesters imported by Mr. Samuel Campbell, of New York Mills, Oneida County, New York, and Mr. James Brodie, of Rural Hill, Jefferson County, New York. They were imported in the spring of 1861. The ram was bred by Mr. Simpson and the ewe by John Thomas Robinson, both of Yorkshire, England. The ram weighs 276 Ibs.* Messrs. Campbell and Brodies' ewes weigh from 200 Ibs. to 250 Ibs. Their "yearlings and wethers yield from 10 Ibs. to 15 Ibs. of wool and their breeding ewes about 8 Ibs." * His weight of fleece was not sent to me, nor was the seperate weight of the fleece of the ewe of which a cut is given. Messrs. C. and B. sold a ram to Sanford Howard, Esq., of Boston, which at 21 months old weighed 273 Ibs., and they have a two year old which weighs 300 Ibs. 48 COTSWOLDS INTRODUCED. COTSWOLD BAM. THE COTSWOLD SHEEP. — The Cotswold Sheep were introduced into the United States about thirty-five years ago. Mr. Dunn imported a ram to cross with his New Leicesters in 1832, and I think some other importations of pairs or single ones took place not far from the same period. The first considerable importation of which I have any information was made in 1840, by Hon. Erastus Corning, of Albany, New York, and William H. Sotham, then of Jefferson County, New York, whose sheep, twenty-five in number, were bred by Mr. Hewer, of Northleach, Gloucestershire, England. Like all the improved Cotswolds, they had a dash of New Leicester blood, and they were very superior animals of the family. The same gentlemen purchased later in 1840 fifty ewes in lamb from Mr. Hewer, and twenty from Mr. William Cother, of Middle Aston, England. These were also prime sheep. From Messrs. Corning and Sotham's stock have originated many valuable flocks, now widely scattered throughout the country. Quite a large number of Cotswolds have since been imported from Canada, a considerable portion of them from the flock of Mr. Frederick William Stone, of Moreton Lodge, COTSWOLD SHEEP. 49 Guelph, Canada West. " Pilgrim," the ram, of which a cut is given on preceding page, was bred by Mr. Stone, and is now the property of Mr. Henry G. White, of South Fra- mingham, Massachusetts. Pilgrim, just off his winter feed, weighs 250 Ibs. He would weigh considerably more in the fall. He yielded 18 Ibs. of wool in 1862. The ewe, " Lady Gay," a portrait of which is given on next page was also bred by Mr. Stone, and is owned by Mr. White. She weighs 200 Ibs., suckling a lamb. She yielded 16 pounds of wool in 1862. Pilgrim, and five ewes belonging to Mr. White, yielded an average of 16 Ibs. of wool per head. The Cotswolds are thus described by Mr. Spooner in his work on Sheep : — " The Cotswold is a large breed of sheep, with a long and abundant fleece, and the ewes are very prolific and good nurses. Formerly they were bred only on the hills, and fatted in the valleys of the Severn and the Thames ; but with the inclosure of the Cotswold Hills and the improvement of their cultivation they have been reared and fatted in the same district. They have been extensively crossed with the Leicester sheep, by which their size and fleece have been somewhat diminished, but their carcasses considerably improved, and their maturity rendered earlier. The wethers are now sometimes fattened at 14 months old, when they weigh from 15 Ibs. to 24 Ibs. per quarter, and at two years old'increase to 20 Ibs. or 30 Ibs. The wool is strong, mellow, and of good color, though rather coarse, 6 to 8 inches in length, and from 7 Ibs. to 8 Ibs. per fleece. The superior hardihood of the improved Cotswold over the Leicester, and their adaptation to common treatment, together with the prolific nature of the ewes and their abundance of milk, have rendered them in many places rivals of the N"ew Leicester, and have obtained for them, of late years, more attention to their selection and general treatment, under Avhich management still further improvement appears very probable. They have also been used in crossing other breeds, and as before noticed, have been mixed with the Hampshire Downs. It is, indeed, the improved Cotswold that, under the term New or Improved Oxfordshire Sheep, are so frequently the successful candidates for prizes offered for the best long- wooled sheep at some of the principal agricultural meetings or shows in the Kingdom. The quality of the mutton is considered superior to that of the Leicester, the tallow being- less abundant, with a larger development of muscle or flesh. We may, therefore, regard this breed as one of established 3 50 LINCOLNS INTRODUCED. reputation, and extending itself throughout every district of the Kingdom COTSWOLD EWE. THE LIHCOLNS. — The Lincolns are a less improved and larger variety of long-wools than either of the preceding, and those introduced into the United States, having been mostly or entirely merged by cross-breeding with the Leicesters and Cotswolds, they do not demand a separate description. Mr. Leonard D. Clift, of Carmel, Putnam County, New York, imported a ram and ewe of this variety, in 1835, "from the estate of the Earl of Lansdowne, Yorkshire, England." Messrs. George H. Gossip & Brother imported a number in 1836 from Lancashire. From these Mr. Clift obtained sixteen ewes and a ram, and established a flock which was generally regarded as highly valuable. They were hardy, gross feeders, and very prolific. They yielded from 6 Ibs. to 10 Ibs. of wool per head. Mr. Clift sold a lot of half-blood two year old wethers in February, 1839, which weighed 125 Ibs. to the carcass, and he obtained 25 cents a pound for them. * Spooner on Sheep, p. 99. NEW OXFOEDS — BLACK -FACED SHEEP. 51 THE NEW OXFOEDSHIBES, OB IMPBOVED COTSWOLDS. — These were first introduced into this country by Mr. Charles Reybold, of Delaware, in 1846. They are the result of a cross between the New Leicesters and Cotswolds, the preponder- ance being given to the blood of the latter. We have seen the very high character given of them by Mr. Spooner, in his description of the Cotswolds, already quoted. In Mr. James S. GrennelPs Report, as Chairman of the Committee on Sheep Husbandry appointed by the Massachu- setts State Board of Agriculture, 1860, is given the following communication in regard to these Sheep by an American breeder of them, then of eight years standing — Mr. Lawrence Smith, of Middlefield : " I doubt whether they are as hardy as the old-fashioned Cotswolds or South Downs. I have never had any trouble with them in regard to cold weather, or changes of climate ; indeed, they prefer an open, cool, airy situation to any other, and nothing is more destructive to their health than tight, ill- ventilated stables. My present experience warrants me in saying that one-half the ewes will have twins ; they are capital nurses and milkers; I have not had for the past seven years a single case of neglect on the part of the dam, nor have I lost a single lamb from lack of constitution. Yearling ewes will weigh in store condition from 125 Ibs. to 175 Ibs.; fat wethers at three years old, from 175 to 250 Ibs. My heavist breeding ewe last winter weighed 211 Ibs. My flock of store sheep and breeding ewes generally shear from five to seven pounds. My ram fleeces sometimes weigh ten pounds unwashed, and will sell in this condition for twenty-five cents per pound. I never feed any store sheep and lambs with grain, but give them early cut hay, and occasionally a few roots." The New Oxfordshires are not to be confounded with the Oxfordshire Downs, which are cross-breeds between the Cotswolds and South or Hampshire Downs, and which have dark faces. THE BLACK -FACED SCOTCH SHEEP. — These are a small, active, hardy, but for a mountain family, rather docile sheep, which have open, hairy fleeces, and black legs and faces. They can endure great privations, and can even subsist on heather. Hence they are often called the heath sheep. Their mutton is of excellent quality. They weigh on an average from CO Ibs. to 65 Ibs. each at three or four years old ; and they yield about 3 Ibs. per head of washed wool. They have 52 CHEVIOT SHEEP. been introduced into the United States by Mr. Samuel Campbell, of New York Mills, New York, and by Mr. Sanford Howard, of Boston, Massachusetts, for Mr. Isaac Stickuey, of the same State. Mr. Campbell's sheep must be a cross, for he Avrites me that he should think their weight of fleece would be from 6 Ibs. to 8 Ibs., and that on the 13th of May, 1863, they weighed alive as follows: old .ram, 132 Ibs.; old ewe, 103 Ibs.; yearling ram, 102 Ibs.; two yearling ewes, 99 Ibs. and 100 Ibs. They have often been crossed successfully in Scotland and the North of England, with larger families. On the bleak, sterile mountain ranges of North-Eastern NCAV York, arid portions of New England, they probably would prove a profitable acquisition. THE CHEVIOT SHEEP. — Some of these (middle-wooled) sheep were introduced into the State of New York a number of years since, and were thus mentioned by me in Sheep Hus- bandry in the South (1848) : " Sheep of this kind have been imported into my imme- diate neighborhood and were subject to my frequent inspection for two or three years. They had the appearance of small Leicesters, but were considerably inferior in correctness of proportions to high-bred animals of that variety. They perhaps more resemble a cross between the Leicester and the old Native or common breed of the United States. Their fleeces were too coarse to furnish a good carding wool — too short for a good combing one. Mixed with a small lot of better wool, their this year's clip sold for 29 cents per pound, while my heavier Merino fleeces sold for 42 cents per pound. They attracted no notice, and might at any time have been bought of their owner for the price of common sheep of the same weight. I believe the flock was broken up and sold to butchers and others this spring, after shearing. They were certainly inferior to the description of the breed by Sir John Sinclair, even in 1792, quoted by Mr. Youatt,* and had all the defects attributed to the original stock by Cully.f They might not, however, have been favorable specimens of the breed." Mr. Spooner thus describes the improved family : — "This breed has greatly extended itself throughout the mountains of Scotland, and in many instances snpplanted the black- faced breed ; but the change, though in many cases advanta- * On Sheep, pp. 285-6. t Cully on Live Stock, p 150. ASIATIC AND AFRICAN BREEDS. 53 gcous, has in some instances been otherwise, the latter being somewhat hardier, and more capable of subsisting on healthy pasturage. They are, however, a hardy race, well suited for their native pastures, bearing with comparative impunity the storms of winter, and thriving well on poor keep. Though less hardy than the black-faced sheep of Scotland, they are more profitable as respects their feeding, making more flesh on an equal quantity of food, and making it quicker. They have white faces and legs, open countenances, lively eyes, without horns. The ears are large, and somewhat singular, and there is much space between the ears and eyes. The carcass is long ; the back straight ; the shoulders rather light ; the ribs circular ; and the quarters good. The legs are small in the bone and covered with wool, as well as the body, with the exception of the face. The Cheviot wether is fit for the butcher at three years old, and averages from 12 Ibs. to 18 Ibs. per quarter — the mutton being of a good quality, though inferior to the South Down, and of less flavor than the black- faced. * * * The Cheviot, though a mountain breed, is quiet and docile, and easily managed. The wool is fine,* closely covers the body, assisting much in preserving it from the effects of wet and cold; the fleece averaging about 3J Ibs. Formerly the wool was extensively employed for making cloths, but having given place to the finer Saxony wool, it has sunk in price, and been confined to combing purposes. It has thus become altogether a secondary consideration." FAT- HUMPED, BROAD -TAILED, PERSIAN AND CHINESE SHEEP. — All of these breeds of sheep have been introduced into the United States from Asia and Africa, but as a general thing perhaps rather for the indulgence of curiosity than from any expectation of establishing valuable flocks from them. A variety of the Broad -Tailed sheep, however, sent home by Commodore Porter from Smyrna, was bred for a considerable period in the United States, and kept pure in South Carolina.f A family of them, termed the "Tunisian Mountain Sheep," were received "in a national ship" by Col. Pickering, who caused them to be distributed in Pennsylvania ; they were bred there for some time, and were very highly commended by Mr. John Hare Powell, j A * Mr. Spooner undoubtedly employs this term relatively, meaning fine for a middle -wooled sheep. 1 1 received this information from Hon. R. F. W. Allston, late Governor of that State. $ See his Letter on Various Breeds of Sheep, 1826, in Memoirs of N. Y. Board of 54 CHINESE SHEEP. Persian ram, " very large and well formed, carrying wool of great length, but of a coarse staple," crossed with New Leicester ewes, formed, as we have already seen when speak- ing of the New Leicesters, the " Arlington long-wooled sheep" of Mount Vernon, a sub-variety which attracted considerable notice in its day. The Chinese, or Nankin sheep, have recently been brought into this country and England, and have attracted some notice from the fact that they frequently give birth to three or four lambs at a time and breed twice a year — facts which have led to the expectation that they may prove profitable for lamb raising in the vicinity of cities. I have seen no description of their qualities in any other particulars. None of these breeds have proved, or probably will prove, of much value as mutton sheep, compared with the improved English families, and as wool-producing sheep they are all worthless compared with the Merino. I have therefore thought that particular descriptions of them would not be worth the space they would occupy. Agriculture, vol. 3, p. 377. Mr. Peters, of Pennsylvania, also imported Tunis sheep, and thought well of them. CHAPTER VI. 'BEITISH SHOKT-WOOLED SHEEP, ETC,, IN THE UNITED STATES. THE SOUTH DOWNS, HAMPSHIRE DOWNS, SHROPSHIRE DOWNS, AND OXFORDSHIRE DOWNS. THE principal Short -Woolcd British families of Sheep which have been introduced in any considerable numbers into the United States since the period of the early settlement of the country, are the South Downs, the Hampshire Downs, the Shropshire Downs and the Oxfordshire Downs. I include the last nnder this designation only because they are classed among the Downs, — for those introduced into the United States are really a middle if not almost a long-wooled sheep. THE SOTTTH DOWNS. — Professor "Wilson, in his paper already cited, thus describes the South Downs : " The South Downs of the present day present probably as marked an improvement upon the original breed as that exhibited by the Leicesters or any other breed. To the late Mr. Ellman, of Glynde, they are indebted for the high estimation in which they are now generally held. When he commenced his experiments in breeding he found the sheep of small size and far from possessing good points ; being long and thin in the neck ; narrow in the fore quarters ; high on the shoulders ; low behind, yet high on the loins ; sharp on the back ; the ribs flat, drooping behind, with the tail set very low ; good in the leg, though somewhat coarse in the hfme. By a careful and unremitting attention during a series of years to the defective points in the animal, and a judicious selection of his breeding flock, his progressive improvements were at length acknowledged far and wide ; and he closed an useful and honorable career of some fifty years with the satisfactory conviction that he had obtained for his favorite breed a repu- tation and character which would secure them a place as the first of our short -wooled sheep. 56 SOUTH DOWN SHEEP. "The South-Down sheep of the present day are without horns, and with dark brown faces and legs ; the size and weight have been increased ; the fore quarters improved in width and depth ; the back and loins have become broader and the ribs more curved, so as to form a straight and level back ; the hind quarters are square and full, the tail well set on, and the limbs shorter and finer in the bone. These results are dxie to the great and constant care which has been bestowed on the breed by Ellman and his contemporaries, as well as by his successors, whose flocks fully sustain the character of the improved breed. SOUTH DOWN KAM. "The sheep, though fine in form and symmetrical in appearance, are very hardy, keeping up their condition on moderate pastures and readily adapting themselves to the diiferent districts and systems of farming in which they are now met with. They are very docile, and thrive well, even when folded on the artificial pastures of an arable farm. Their disposition to fatten enables them to be brought into the market at twelve and fifteen months old, when they average SOUTH DOWN SHEEP. 57 80 Ibs. weight each. At two years old they will weigh from 100 to 120 Ibs. each. The meat is of fine quality and always commands the highest price in the market. The ewes are very prolific, and are excellent mothers, commonly rearing 120 to 130 lambs to the 100 ewes. The fleece, which closely covers the body, produces the most valuable of our native wools. It is short in the staple, fine and curling, with spiral ends, and is used for carding purposes generally."* * Mr. Jonas Webb, of Babraham, Cambridgeshire, was the most successful follower of Ellman, and carried the breed to ili;it perfection which is now seen in its best specimens. The average weight of his sheep, at from 13 to 15 months old, was about 126 Ibs., and the average yield of wool per head, about 0 Ibs. SOUTH DOWX EWES. Choice specimens of Mr. E 'man's sheep were imported into the United States some years since by Mr. John Hare Powell, of Pennsylvania, Francis Rotch, Esq., of New York, and various other breeders. Mr. Webb's have also been exten- * Journal of the Royal Agricultural Society, vol. 16, p. 3* 58 SOUTH DOWN SHEEP. Bively imported by Mr. Thqrne of New York, Mr. Alexander of Kentucky, Mr. Taylor of New Jersey, and others. It is understood that the leading American importers left no sheep in England superior to those purchased by them. Mr. Thorne furnished me the following facts in regard to his flock, in answer to inquiries which embraced all the subjects touched upon by him : "My flock of South Downs consists of something over 200 head, exclusive of lambs. They are descended from fourteen different importations, principally from the flock of the late Jonas Webb. Those not of his breeding were prize pens at the Show of the Royal Agricultural Society of England, and bred by Henry Lugar, of Hengrave, near Bury St. Edmunds. The rams used have all been selected with the greatest care from the celebrated Babraham flock. 'Archbishop' is the one which is now being principally used. He was the first prize yearling at the Royal Show at Canterbury in 1860, and was chosen by myself from Mr. "Webb's folds as the best ram he then had. His price there was $1,250. He was imported in December, 1860. "The breeding ewes average from 80 to 100 in number. They usually lamb in March. The rate of increase for the past six years has been 142 per cent. This year (1863) it has been 158. As soon as the lambs straighten up, they are docked, and the males that are not to be kept for service are castrated. They are weaned at about four months old. The ewe and wether lambs are given good, short pastures,* and the ram lambs are folded on rape and kept there until all stock is housed. Frost (unless perhaps a very severe one) does not appear to injure the plant, and hence they can be kept upon it longer than on grass. They are confined to this feed, unless a few small ones may require grain, which some- times is given to the lot. When put in winter quarters the wethers have hay and roots : the others have in addition a little grain. The breeding ewes are kept on hay until two months before lambing, when they are given a small feed of corn which is soon increased to half a pint each per day. When they lamb they are given turnips instead of grain. The wethers [yearlings] are given good pasturage the next season and feed is commenced as soon as the slightest frost makes its appearance, half a pint of corn to each. When put in the * In another letter, Mr. Thorne says : " My own experience has convinced me that It 18 not advisable to put lambs upon new seeds, or after growth from new meadows, •where the growth has been very rank." HAMPSHIRE DOWN SHEEP. 59 sheds they are given turnips and the corn is increased to a pint each. They are marketed generally at Christmas. They usually dress from 75 to 100 Ibs. This year 75 that were sold to Bryan Lawrence of New York averaged in weight 87 £ Ibs. " With regard to the wool-producing qualities of the South Down, the one year that I kept an accurate account, the ewe flock, including among the number sheep eight and nine years old, all having suckled lambs, gave 6 Ibs. 5i oz.; the yearling ewes 8 Ibs. 12 oz.; the yearling rams from 8 to 12 Ibs. This was unwashed wool, though as you are aware, their wool is not of a greasy character, and should not be shrunk at the most over one-fourth, by the buyer. " You may remember to have seen some notices of the sales of Jonas Webb's South Downs. The first sale, in 1861, included all the flock except lambs, and numbered 200 rams and 770 ewes. They brought £10,926. The balance were sold in 1862, and numbered 148 rams and 289 ewes. Amount of sale, £5,720. Total two years sales, more than $80,000."* Mr. Thorne further writes me: — "Breeding ewes require exercise ; I have always considered it more to the advantage of meadows than of sheep that they should be yarded." His sheep have been extremely healthy. The only prevalent disease among them has been puerperal or parturient fever, at lambing. Prior to 1859 he had but one or two cases a year, but that year twenty, and four ewes died. This was his worst year, and under a new mode of treatment the disease is apparently entirely disappearing from his flock. It never, however, was confined to his flock or family of sheep, he informs me, but has been a prevalent disease among sheep of all kinds in the neighborhood, though often called by other names. The ram, a cut of which is given on page 56, is " Arch- bishop," already mentioned, bred by Mr. Jonas Webb, and owned by Mr. Thorne. The ewes, cuts of which are given on page 57, are a pair of two-year olds bred by Mr. Thorne from his imported stock. HAMPSHIRE DOWNS. — Professor Wilson thus describes the Hampshire Downs : " This rapidly increasing breed of sheep appears to be the result of a recent cross between the pure South Down and the old horned white-face sheep of Hampshire and Wiltshire, by which the hard-working, though fine quality, of the former is * This letter is dated Thorndale, Washington Hollow, N. Y., April 3, 18C3. 60 HAMPSHIRE DOWN SHEEP. combined with the superior size and constitution of the latter. The breed was commenced at the early part of the present century ; and by a system of judicious crossing now possesses the leading characteristics of the two parent breeds. In some of the best farmed districts of Wiltshire, Hampshire and Berkshire, they have gradually displaced the South Downs, and have in themselves afforded another distinct breed for crossing with the long-wooled sheep. Their leading character- istics are, as sompared with the South Down, an increased size, equal maturity, and a hardier constitution. The face and head are larger and coarser in their character ; the frame is heavier throughout ; the carcass is long, roomy, though less symmetrical than the South Down, and the wool of a coarser though longer staple. Their fattening propensity is scarcely equal to that of the South Down. These points have all received great attention lately from the breeders ; and the improved Hamp- shire Down now possesses, both in shape, quality of wool, aptitude to fatten and early maturity, all the qualities for which the pure South Down has been so long and so justly celebrated. The lambs are usually dropped early and fed for the markets as lambs, or kept until the following spring, when, if well fed, they weigh from 80 to 100 Ibs., and command a good market. " The Hampshire Downs are used like the South Downs for the purpose of crossing with other breeds ; being hardier in constitution they are perhaps better calculated for the Northern districts, where the climate is sometimes very severe." Mr. Spooner, in a paper " On Cross Breeding," published in the Journal of the Royal Agricultural Society of England, 1859, expresses opinions of this variety of sheep very similar to those above given by Professor Wilson, and he makes the following remarks in relation to their origin and blood : " We have no reason to suppose that after a few generations the Hampshire breeders continued to use the South Down* rams ; as soon as the horns were gone, to which perhaps the Berkshire Notts contributed, and'the face had become black, they employed their own cross-bred rams with the cross-bred ewes. If then we were asked what original blood predomi- nated in the Hampshire sheep, we should unquestionably say the South Down ; but if the further question were put, is the present breed derived from the South Down and the original Hampshire alone, we should express* a doubt as to such a * Mr. Spooner in several instances terms them "Sussex" in the remarks I quote, meaning thereby South Down ; and to prevent confusion among those not used to the rmer name, I have changed it in every instance to South Down. t SHROPSHIRE DOWN SHEEP. 61 conclusion, as there is good reason to consider that some improved Cotswold blood has been infused." After giving some facts to prove that this last cross was taken, Mr. Spooner continues: "Although after dipping once or twice into this breed, they then ceased to do so, yet they have continued breeding from the descendants of the cross, and thus in very many of the Hampshire and Wiltshire flocks, there is still some improved Cots \vold, and consequently Leicester blood.* Probably an increase of wool has thus been obtained. Some say that on the borders of Berkshire the Berkshire Nott was also used, and others' contend, although without proof, that a dip of the Leicester lias been infused. Be this as it may there is no doubt that, although for some years past the Hampshire sheep have, for the most part, been kept pure, yet they have been very extensively crossed with other breeds before this period."f A ram and five ewes of this family, bred by Francis Budd, Esq., of Hampshire, England, and which had been successful competitors . at the Exhibition of the Royal Agricultural Society, were imported in 1855 by Mr. Thomas Messenger, of Clarence Hall, Great Neck, Long Island. They have received first prizes from the State Agricultural Society, from the American Institute, and from various other Societies ; and they found a rapid sale in the South prior to the present war. Mr. Messenger writes me that he finds them better suited to the climate where he resides, and more hardy, than the South Downs. He breeds them pure, and also crosess them with Cotswolds and Leicesters, with great advantage, in his opinion, to both the latter families of sheep. THE SHROPSHIRE DOWNS, — Shropshire or Shrops, as they are variously called, are thus described by Professor Wilson : "In our early records of sheep farming, Shropshire is described as possessing a peculiar and distinct variety of sheep, to which the name of 'Morfe Common' sheep was given, from the locality to which the breed was principally confined. * * In 1792, when the Bristol Wool Society procured as much information as possible regarding sheep in England, they reported as follows in reference to the Morfe Common breed : — ' On Morfe Common, near Bridgenorth, which con- tains about 600,000 acres, there are about 10,000 sheep kept * In a note Mr. Spooner here states that it is "generally acknowledged that the Cotswold sheep have been improved by crosses from the Leicester ram." t Journal of Royal Agricultural Society, Vol. 20, page 302. SHROPSHIRE DOWN SHEEP. during the summer months, which produce wool of superior quality. They are considered a native breed — are black-faced or brown, or a spotted faced, horned sheep, little subject to either rot or scab — weighing, the wethers from 11 to 14 Ibs., SHROPSHIRE RAM. and the ewes from 9 to 11 Ibs. per quarter, after being fed with clover and turnips ; and clipping nearly 2 Ibs. per fleece, exclusive of the breeching, which may be taken at one-seventh or one-eighth part of the whole.' * * This appears to have been the original stock from which the present breed of Shropshire Downs has sprung. As the county advanced, and the breeds became valuable for their carcasses as well as for their wool, the Morfe Common sheep were crossed with other breeds, but more particularly with the long-wooled Leicesters and Cotswolds, or the short- wooled South Downs. The admixture of such different blood has produced a corresponding variation in the characters of the present breed of Shropshire Downs, and has tended materially to sustain the hesitation which still exists to allow them a place as a distinct breed.* * This was written in 1856. _, ' SHROPSHIRE DOWN SHEEP. 63 Where, however, the original cross was with the South Down, and the breed has been continued unmixed with the long- wooled sheep, they present the characteristics of a short- wooled breed, and as such are already recognized in the Yorkshire and other markets. * * * These sheep are without horns, with faces and legs of a gray or spotted gray color ; the neck is thick with excellent scrag ; the head well shaped, rather small than large, with ears well set on ; breast broad and deep ; back straight, with good carcass ; hind quarters hardly so wide as the South Down, and the legs clean with stronger bone. They are very hardy, thrive well on moderate keep, and are rapidly prepared for market as tegs, [between weaning and shearing,] weighing on the average 80 Ibs. to 100 Ibs. each. The meat is of excellent quality, and commands the best prices. The ewes are prolific and good mothers. The fleece, which is heavier than the South Down, is longer and more glossy in the staple than the other short wools, and weighs on the average 7 Ibs." Mr. Spooner says of them that they were first brought into national repute at the Shrewsbury Meeting, in 1845. He remarks: — "At the Chester Meeting they beat the Hamp- shire Downs as old sheep, but in their turn were conquered by the latter in the younger classes. They present themselves to our notice in a more compact form ; though shorter they are wider, broader on the heart and deeper through the heart." Mr. Spooner quotes Mr. J. Meire, as having stated at a meeting of the Farmers' Club in Shropshire, [in 1858 or 1859,] that the sheep produced by the cross between the original sheep and South Down " was well adapted for the downs, but for the in closures of Shropshire something more docile was required, consequently recourse was had to the Leicester." And Mr. Spooner adds: — "This crossing and recrossing at length gave place to the practice of careful selection, and thus uniformity was sought for and attained, and the present superior breed was established. It is now held that no further cross is required." Mr. Charles Howard of Biddenham, Bedfordshire, in an address delivered before the London or Central Farmers' Club, in 1860, said: " This breed has been established by a prudent selection of the breeding animals,' and I learn from a gentleman who kindly favored me with information upon the point, that the late Mr. Meire was the first to improve upon the original type. This he did in the first place by the use of the Leicester ; 04 SHEOPSHIKE DOWN SHEEP. as their faces became white he would then have recourse to a South Down or other dark-faced sheep. It was, however, left to the son to carry out and to bring to a successful issue what the father had commenced, and Mr. Samuel Meire no doubt may be looked upon as the founder of the improved Shropshire Downs. We gather from his address to the Wenlock Farmers' Club that he accomplished this, not by resorting to any of the established breeds, but by using the best animals from his own large flock. * * Lately a very great change has come over the breeders of Shropshire ; they have availed themselves of larger sheep of heavier fleece and earlier maturity, so that the only affinity they bear to the original Shrop are dark faces and legs ; they now pride them- selves in exhibiting some well fatted shearlings [yearlings past,] weighing upon times 22 Ibs. to 24 Ibs. per quarter, but this is not general. SHROPSHIRE DOWN Very fine specimens of this variety have been imported into the United States and Canada. The two animals repre- sented in the foregoing cuts are owned by Hon. N. L. Chatfee, OXFORDSHIRE DOWN SHEEP. 65 of Jefferson, Ashtabula County, Ohio. The ram, "Lion," now three years old, was bred by Lord Berwick, of Shrews- bury, England, and impoi-ted in 1861. His live weight is 334 Ibs., and he yielded on the 16th of May, 1863, 17 Ibs. 5 oz. of washed wool of 11 £ months growth. The ewe, "Nancy," was bred by Lord Berwick, and imported at the same time. She is three years old, and her live weight is 241 Ibs. On the 16th of May, 1863, she yielded 9 Ibs. 3 oz. of washed wool of Hi months growth. Six ewes at the same time, and under the same circumstances, yielded 42 Ibs. 5 oz. of wool. They were sheared the fifth day after washing in clear brook water. In answer to my inquiries on the subject, Judge Chaffee writes me that these sheep were imported by Mr. George Miller, of Markham, Canada West ; that they are very hardy, healthy and easily kept ; and that they excel in these particulars all his other sheep, of which he has four kinds. He says : " They are nearly as large as the long-wooled breed, say Cotswolds or Leicesters, and yielding just about the same quantity of wool, are in my judgment much more hardy and healthy. They have the dark colored legs and face of the South Down ; much longer, thicker and more compact fleeces than the South Downs, and much thicker and more compact ones than the long-wooled breeds. They have all the nice, round, compact frame, and even, uniform symmetry of appear- ance of the South Down, and are about 33 per cent, heavier. I have never slaughtered any of this breed, and cannot speak from personal knowledge as to the quality of their mutton, but it is said, by those who do know, to be very superior and hardly to be excelled by the South Down." THE OXFORDSHIRE DOWNS. — This is a new family of sheep, and I take the following account of its origin from the already quoted address of Mr. Charles Howard, delivered before the London Farmers' Club. Mr. Howard is a well known breeder of them. He says : "The 'Oxfordshire Downs' are what are commoi^jp' styled cross-bred sheep ; but their patrons, in 1857, determined upon giving them a definite name. Hence their new title, the propriety of which is demurred to by some; for its only similarity to a Down is its color, while its size and fleece partake more of the long- wool — important qualities, which have been long and carefully cultivated by the promoters of this breed. They were originally produced by crossing the 66 OXFORDSHIRE DOWN SHEEP. Hampshire and in some instances South Down ewe with a Cotswold ram — most commonly the former, for it gave increased size — and the putting the crosses together : by con- stant attention and weeding, a most successful" result has been accomplished, producing a kind of sheep that possess, with uniformity of character and hardiness of constitution, large frames, good fleeces, aptitude to fatten, and mutton of superior quality." Mr. Howard quotes the Messrs. Druce, father and son, who were among the leading originators and most successful exhibitors of the variety, as publishing the fact that their flock originated from a cross between the South Down and Cotswold. The younger Druce says: — "The flocks generally drop their lambs in the month of February, and at 13 or 14 months old they are ready for market, weighing upon an average 10 stones [140 Ibs.] each, with a fleece varying from 7 to 10 Ibs. The ewes are good mothers and produce a great proportion of twins." Mr. Druce, senior, commenced this cross in 1833. Mr. Hitchman, an extremely successful breeder and exhibitor of them, started five years earlier, crossing the Hampshire Down and 'Cotswold. His tegs [weaned lambs] when shorn would average, in 1860, eleven stone [154 Ibs.,] and his entire clip of wool 7 Ibs. per fleece. These sheep were first introduced into the United States by Richard S. Fay, Esq., of Lynn, Massachusetts, and the Hon. William C. Rives, of Virginia, who selected and imported their sheep together. Mr. Fay had a considerable extent of rough pasturage better adapted to sheep than other animals, and he first stocked it with fine-wooled sheep and subsequently with crosses between them and South Downs. Neither experiment resulted satisfactorily. A residence of several years in England induced him to turn his attention to the English breeds, and he came to the conclusion that they would better answer his purposes. Living two years among the Shropshires he was highly pleased with them, but on going to see Mr. Gillet's and Mr. Druce's Oxfordshire Downs he gave^hem the preference, and purchased and sent home a ram and ten ewes of this family. He subsequently imported several other lots for David Sears, Jr., of Boston, and for himself. Mr. Fay, in answer to my inquiries, informs me that these sheep fully meet his expectations — that they are of good constitution, and " take to his briars and rough pastures as if •* to the manor born.' " He has no difficulty in raising all their lambs, dropped in March, and the ewes are many of OXFOBDSHIKE DOWN SHEEP. 67 them then fit for the butcher. The mutton, killed from his rocky, rough pastures, in November, is of very high quality. His ewes, in 1862, averaged 8J Ibs. to the fleece, unwashed — the average weight of the shorn ewes being 135 Ibs. and rams 220 Ibs. The yield of lambs was 160 per cent, on the number of breeding ewes. In 1863 the yield of wool fell to a small fraction under 8 Ibs., and the increase of lambs rose to 175 per cent.* His wethers yield on the average fully 10 Ibs. of wool. At my request, Mr. Fay forwarded me specimens of their wool. The first was taken from a ram two years old, weighing 220 Ibs., and his fleece this year weighed 12 Ibs. 10 oz. The wool is about 8 inches long. The ewe, three years old, with two ram lambs at her side nearly two months old, weighed 136 Ibs., and her fleece 8 Ibs. The wool is over 7 inches long ; the quality in both instances is rather fine for wool of such length ; it has a good luster ; is neither hairy nor harsh; and it has a very desirable quality for certain fabrics, and will always command a ready sale.f These sheep have gray faces and legs, lighter colored than those of the South Downs. Theypartake of the admirable forms of their parent stocks ; are gentle and disinclined to rove ; but they are willing to work hard for their feed, and are very promiscuous feeders. They make excellent returns for their feed and mature very early. * Every practical sheep fanner understands of course that a nursing ewe yields considerably less wool than a dry one, and that the fleece is still more diminished by a ewe's nursing two lambs. 1 1 made special inquiries in regard to this wool, and detail the result, when I have not done so in regard to the other English families, because the Oxfordshire Downs are of more recent origin, and far less is generally known of them in our country, in this particular. CHAPTER VII. THE POINTS TO BE EEGAEDED IE FlflE-WOOLED SHEEP, CARCASS — SKIN — FOLDS OR WRINKLES — FLEECE — FINENESS EVENNESS TRUENESS AND SOUNDNESS PLIANCY AND SOFTNESS STYLE. AND LENGTH OF WOOL. WHETHER in purchasing sheep for the establishment of flocks, or in carrying on the breeding of existing flocks, it is necessary to have a clear knowledge of those points which constitute the peculiar excellencies of the chosen variety. With respect to the English mutton breeds, this information was placed before the world with all the precision and accuracy of combined scientific and practical knowledge, by the late Mr. Youatt — by far the most comprehensive and able investigator in this department of knowledge, and also in the veterinary art, the world has yet known. The new discoveries, advances, or changes in public taste, which have taken place in breeding the English sheep since his day, have been carefully described by Mr. Spooner, Professor Wilson, and various other writers, in the English Agricultural periodicals, particularly by the authors of the prize essays published in the Journal of the Royal Agricultural Society. In one form or another, all these publications have become widely known to the American public. They are to be found in every considerable library. Our American works on sheep have been — at least so far as English breeds are concerned — but reprints of them. Our universally disseminated Agricul- tural Journals have spread all their most important contents broadcast throughout our country. The fine-wooled or Merino sheep has been made the subject of comparatively little accurate and detailed investigation and description. Spain, the native land of this breed, has no literature which pertains to sheep.* In Great * Though much that pertains to shepherds and shepherdesses ! Cervantes several times makes himself merry over the pastoral literature of Spain. Speaking of his own CARCASS OF THE MERINO. 69 Britain the Merino was soon found not to meet the requirements of the market and prevailing systems of agriculture; and its breeding has been but little pursued there. In France and Germany considerable has been written concerning it, but most of it is inapplicable here, because the standards of excellence adopted in each of those countries differ essentially from those accepted in our own. Indeed, our own standards have materially changed within a few years, owing to circumstances already mentioned. It is for this last reason that the valuable works on Sheep Husbandry which have appeared in the United States do not furnish full information in regard to those points of the Merino sheep which now best meet the requirements of the market and the interests of the grower. This information is the more needful at a moment when multitudes of comparatively inexperienced persons, under the stimulus of an extraordinary demand for wool, are engaging in its production.* CARCASS. — Carcass is undoubtedly the first point to be regarded, even in the fine-wooled sheep, for on its form and constitution depends the health of the animal. Good medium size, for the family, is the most desirable one under ordinary circumstances, for with that size generally go the best development of the parts and the greatest degree of vigor. The body should be round and deep, not over long, and both the head and neck short and thick. The back should be straight and broad ; the bosom and buttock full ; the legs short, well apart, straight and strong, with heavy forearm and fulness in the twist. I decidedly incline to the opinion that it is not advisable to attempt to bring all our American Merinos to the same standard of size. There are now two well marked families — the Infantado, which have been bred large, and the Paulars, which have been kept a size or two smaller and shorter. The former are for the rich lands, the "Galatea," he says many of its shepherds and shepherdesses are only such in their costume: and this describes all the pastoral romance and poetry of Spain from Montemayor's " Diana Enamorada" down to Lope de Yeira's " Arcadia." If there is a book in the Spanish tongue on the practical topics of Sheep Husbandry I have never heard of it ! * The prices of pure Merino sheep were nearly as high, and in some cases higher, during the fall and winter of 1862-03 than they were between 1808 and 1815. Consider- able ilocks of ewes were sold at .$100 a head, and small numbers at every intermediate prior between this and $300, $406. or even .sr,(M. a head. One breeder sold some ewes at sr,iK) and declined much higher oilers for favorite individuals. He declined an offer of 's-'il (KM) for 50 ewes. Had they been sold, the purchaser was to receive $15,000 for half of them from other parties. I state this on the authority of the person making the offer, Mr. A. M. Clark, of St. Albans, Vermont. Choice rams sold for $500 to $600, and for one or two very celebrated ones $2,500 a piece could have been taken. 70 SKIN FOLDS OK WRINKLES. latter for the more elevated and sterile ones. They bear the same relation to each other in this particular that is reciprocally borne by the Short-Horn and Devon cattle. Of the crosses between them, I shall have occasion to speak hereafter. THE SKIH. — The skin should be of a deep, rosy color. The Spaniards justly regarded this a point of much importance, as indicative of the easy-keeping and fattening properties of the animal, and of a healthy condition of the system. The skin should be thinnish, mellow, elastic, and particularly loose on the carcass. A white skin, when the animal is in health, or a tawny one, is rarely found on a high bred Merino. A thick, stiff, inelastic skin, like that found on many badly bred French sheep, is highly objectionable. FOLDS OB " WRINKLES." — The Spanish, French and German breeders approved of folds in the skin, considering them indications of a heavy fleece. The French have bred them over the entire bodies of many of their sheep. To this extent, and especially when prominent, firm to the feel, and incapable of being drawn smooth under the shears, they are an unmitigated nuisance, both in appearance and reality. If they bear additional wool, this is counter-balanced by its defective quality on the upper edges of the folds and the great unevenness they thereby give the fleece ; and were this otherwise, the additional amount would not half compensate for the loss of time in shearing, in the "catching" weather of the spring, when good shearers are so difficult to obtain. It would be vastly more economical to keep one or two per cent. more sheep, to obtain the same amount of wool. But I must confess that among the thousands of these disfigured animals which I have examined, I never yet saw one which presented the maximum of both length and density of wool, or yielded the maximum in weight of fleece. For reasons which I cannot explain, the wool, though often very thick between the folds, is never very long; and it is usually comparatively loose, dryish and light as well as coarse, on the outer edges of the folds. A wide dew-lap, plaited or smooth, single or branching into two parts under the jaws, with "the cross" on the brisket, were all that the older breeders of Merinos desired in this way, on ewes. To these might be added moderate corrugations on the neck of the ram. Now, fashion calls for FLEECE OF THE MERINO. 71 heavy folds on the neck of the ram and more moderate sized ones on the neck of the ewe — but few besides a class of extremists desire these to extend in great, prominent rolls over the upper side of the neck. The cross extended into a pendulous " apron " — a short fold or two on and immediately back of each elbow — some small curling ones on and uniting with the edges of the tail, (so as to give it a corrugated appearance, and twice its natural breadth,) some smallish ones uniting on the breech under the tail, and running in the direction of lines drawn from the tail to the stifle, or perpen- dicular ones up and down the back edges of the thighs, which, when the wool is grown, close over the twist — a wide plaited fold of loose corrugated skin running up the front edge of the thigh and across the lower edge of the flank, so as to give both the appearance of extraordinary breadth — and finally a general looseness of the skin, which disposes it to lie in small, rounded, very slightly elevated and perfectly soft ridges over the body, giving it a crinkled appearance, but offering no obstruction whatever to the shears, and not showing on the surface of the fleece — are now the points, in these regards, which constitute the ideal of the Merino breeder. FLEECE. — The greatest attainable combination of length and thickness of wool, of the given quality, is the first point to be regarded in a market where all lengths are in equal demand. And the more evenly this length and thickness extend over every covered part, unless below the knees and hocks, the higher the excellence of the animal. It is in this point especially that the modern breeder has improved on his predecessors ; and it is this, in a very considerable degree, which gives the improved American Merino its vast supe- riority in weight of fleece over all other fine sheep, of the same size, in the world. Wool of full length below the knees and hocks would hardly be desirable on account of its liability to become filthy, — but a thick, shortish coat, particularly on the hind legs, making them appear " as large as a man's arm," is regarded by most as a fine, showy point — though it does not add much to the value of the fleece. The wool should extend in an unbroken and undivided mass from the back of the neck over the top of the head and down the face for an inch or two below the eyes, and there abruptly terminate in a square or rounded shape ; it should cover the lower side of the jaws nearly to the mouth, and rise on the cheeks so as to leave only the front face bare, 72 FINENESS OF MERINO AVOOL. terminating abruptly like the forehead wool. The cheek and forehead wool should meet unbroken immediately over the eye and between it and the horn and ear.* But it must by no means unite under the eye — though its outside ends may touch there for a little way. The eye should have just naked space enough about it to leave the sight unimpeded, without any resort to the scissors. The nose should be covered with short, soft, thick, perfectly white hair. Pale, tan-colored spots or "freckles" about the mouth, and the same color on the outer half of the ear,f are not objected to by the breeders of the Paulars — but Infantado breeders usually prefer pure white. Wool on the lower part of the front face, as is often seen in the French Merinos, whether short or long, is regarded as decidedly objectionable, and any wool which obstructs the sight in any degree, is a fault. The cavities of the fleece at the arm-pits, at the base of the scrotum, and inside of the arms and thighs, should be as small as the proper freedom of movement admits. The scrotum should be densely covered with wool to its lower extremity, and the wool on the front of it should extend up so as to unite with the belly wool. The wool should stand at right angles to the surface., except on the inside of the legs and on the scrotum (and the nearer it approaches doing so on the scrotum the better) ; it should present a dense, smooth, even surface externally, drop- ping apart nowhere ; and the masses of wool between those natural cracks or divisions which are always seen on the surface, should be of medium diameter. If they are too small, they indicate a fineness of fleece which is incompatible with its proper weight; if too large, they indicate coarse, harsh wool. FINENESS. — Without having regard to the present anom- alous state of affairs, which has temporarily so changed the * If it unites in a thick, solid mass of full length, it is a beautiful and now rather rare point. t These spots were highly characteristic of several of the families of Merinos originally imported from Spain ; and the lambs of some of them were occasionally covered over the carcass at birth with larger spots of the same color, or of a deeper tawny red. Sometimes the whole body was thus colored. But all these tints disappeared on the body when the wool grew out, and were seen no more. Small black spots were frequently seen about the mouths of Spanish sheep and larger ones on different parts of the body, and coal-black lambs were sometimes yeaned. This color often fades but never disappears. Black lambs are now exceedingly rare in pure American Merino flocks, yet they continue to appear. They are alwiivs excluded from the flock to pre- vent their increase, as they are regarded as unsightly and their wool is less valuable. All the different colors above mentioned are inherited by the Spanish sheep from their original stocks,— from the black, red, and tawny sheep which Pliny, Columella, "•nd other contemporaneous writers describe as existing in Spain about the opening of the hrst century. . EVENNESS OF MERINO WOOL. 73 relative value of our fine and coarse wools, it is known to all conversant with the subject, that uniformly and under all circumstances, there has been a much greater demand for medium than for very fine wools in the American Wool Market; and the table of prices presently to be given will show that the former have always borne a more renumerating price than the latter to the producer. This was true even before our broad-cloth manufactories sunk under the horizontal tariff of 1846. Before that time, by far the greater portion of our home manufactured woolens did not require staples above medium in quality. And of late years fashion has lent its aid still further to reduce the demand for the finer staples. There has been a steadily increasing tendency among our best dressed and most fashionable population to substitute for the broadcloths and fine black cassimeres formerly worn for dress, comparatively coarse cassimeres of various, and among the young, of "fancy" colors. All these causes combined have turned the domestic demand for wools above the grade of coarse, principally into a channel where the requirements of the market are met, and most profitably met for the producer, by the heavy-fleeced American Merino. Should our manufactories of broadcloths and other fine textures revive, as it is to be hoped they may, so far as to supply the domestic demands for such fabrics, there will be an additional call for finer wool, and this will necessarily increase the demand for finer sheep. EVENNESS. — Evenness of quality throughout the fleece, so far as it is attainable, is one of the best results as well as proofs of good breeding. Those usually short, detached, not very coarse, glistening particles of hair found in the fleece, termed "jar," are very objectionable — though they mostly drop out in the different processes to which wool is subjected in manufacturing. They are not so objectionable, however, as that long, strong, rooted hair which crops out through the wool on the thighs and on the edges of the folds — particularly where the latter run over the neck and shoulders in very large prominent rolls. I would not reject an otherwise valuable ewe, of known purity of blood, because half a dozen hairs barely showed themselves on the back edge of and half way down the thigh — though I would much prefer not to see them there, and I would breed such a ewe to a ram which would be sure to leave no such bad mark on the common progeny. But I would much dislike to breed from a ram exhibiting 4 7 4 TRTJEKESS — SOUNDNESS PLIANCY . that defect to the least degree. Rams which have very large folds on the upper side of the neck, are very apt to exhibit more or less hairs on them, and I have occasionally seen this in animals of good blood and good reputation as sire rams. It must be regarded, however, as a serious defect — though not as inexcusable as the cropping out of hairs on other parts of the body, either singly or in masses. This indicates bad blood or breeding. TRITENESS AND SOUNDNESS. — Wool should be of the same diameter or fineness from root to point. This is termed "trueness." On a poor sheep it grows finer, on a fat one coarser. Consequently a change of condition in either direc- tion correspondingly changes the diameter of the same fiber during different stages of its growth. The difference is sometimes visible to the naked eye. When the change of condition has been great — especially when it takes place from a low and unhealthy state to a healthy and fleshy one — it generally occasions "a joint" in the wool, — i. e., the place in the fibers where the change began, is so weak that a slight pull will detach the two parts. Indeed, they often separate on the back of the animal and the whole outer part is shed off. Untrue or jointed wool is not so valuable for various manufactures, and the different parts of it do not receive certain dyes equally. The entire fiber of the wool produced on a diseased sheep, whether it is true or not, usually lacks the proper strength. The same is the case with the wool of very old and very lean sheep. Wool to be "sound" must be strong, firm and elastic. PLIANCY AND SOFTNESS. — Among full-blood, healthy animals, in fair condition, the pliancy and softness of wool usually correspond in degree with its fineness. Where they do not, I should always seriously distrust pretentious to purity of blood. Some allowances, hoAvever, are to be made for modes of keeping. Sheep sheltered from storms and violent atmospheric changes, have softer wool than those habitually exposed to them. Disease, old age and excessive leanness give a drier and "wirier" feeling to wool. But whether this feeling arises from natural or artificial causes, it indicates inferiority of quality. Fabrics made of such materials have less softness and elasticity, fret or fray more readily, and break sooner at corners and on the edges of folds. They admit of less finish, and take less rich, lustrous colors. They STYLE — LENGTH OF WOOL. f5 arc therefore neither so beautiful, nor so good for actual wear. Pliancy and softness are so inseparably connected with the other best properties of 'wool, that a thoroughly practiced person can readily determine its general quality by handling it in the dark . Indeed, where the quality is very high, it can be detected by the first touch of the hand. It has an exquisite downiness of feel which is unmistakable. STYLE. — Style means that combination of appearances which indicates choice wool — viz., fineness, clearness of color, luster, regularity and distinctness of "crimp" — that curved and graceful form and arrangement of the locks and fibers in the sheared fleece which indicate extreme pliancy (stiff, hai-sh wool is straighter,) and that life-like movement on handling and peculiar re-adjustment of the fibers after handling which is occasioned by their spiral form and exquisite elasticity. Style cannot be satisfactorily described in words, but it is as palpable to experienced organs, and is as indicative of actual quality, as the most gross properties of wool — such as length, fineness, or coarseness, etc. I should remark that the highest style, like the highest fineness, softness, etc., belongs only to the smaller and more delicate families of the Merino, like the Electoral Saxon. Prime American Merino wool only approximates to these qualities. And another remark may not be out of place, in passing. The qualities of wool, even including fineness, can be more accurately determined by the natural eye than by the aid of powerful magnifying glasses. LENGTH. — It has already been incidentally mentioned that fine wools of all lengths find an equally ready sale in our markets. Those which would have been regarded as too long for broadcloths when they were manufactured in this country, are more desirable for delaines, shawls, etc., than shorter Avools. The American Merino wool, generally, I think, exceeds all other Merino wools in length. Mr. George Campbell, of West Westminister, Vermont, who recently, (June, 1863,) started with some sheep to exhibit at the World's Fair, at Hamburgh, some time before his departure inclosed me specimens of the wool of the ewes taken out by him. It was of about a year's growth. The longest sample, lying naturally on paper without a particle of stretching, measures 3^- inches in length ; another measures 3£; another 3£; two of them 3; the shortest 2f. Mr. ^Q LENGTH OF MERINO WOOL. Campbell wrote to me: — "The sheep are nearly all of my own stock, which have been bred from the Jarvis and Humphreys importation, and recently from Mr. Hammond's flock." Mr. Prosper Elithorp, of Bridport, Vermont, recently sent me a number of samples of his own wool and that of Mr. O. B. Cook, of Charlotte, Vermont. Mr. Elithorp's, from ewes over one year old, and all having lambs, range from 2^ to 2f inches long, and that of a ram is 3^ inches long, though aU lack 45 days of a year's growth. A part of these ewes are Paulars and a part Infantados. Two of Mr. Cook's (one from a yearling and the other from a two year old ewe,) measure 3^ inches long, and the rest (from yearlings,) from 2f to 2f inches. The sheep are pure Infantados. Mr. A. J. Stow, of West Cornwall Vermont, has for- warded me numerous specimens. The longest is 3f inches long, two of them are 3, and most of the remainder are about 2f inches long. They are all from ewes over one year old, and the wool lacks three or four days of a year's growth. Mr. Stow says "they are all from his Hammond sheep." I have an old specimen of wool from a Paular ram, bred by one of the Robinson's, of Shoreham, Vermont, (and owned by Myrtle & Ackerson, of Steuben County, New York,) which measures 3^ inches long. The recent Vermont specimens above given are fairer tests of the length of the longer stapled American Merino wool, from the fact that they were not sent in any case as specimens of mere length, but of fleeces of extraordinary weight. And I think great length is not now usually particularly valued in any other connection. The sheep which yield the most extraordinary weights of fleece, indeed, rarely have extremely long wool, because such length is rarely accompanied by sufficient thickness. Mr. Hammond's "Sweepstakes," whose weight of fleece has probably never been excelled, yields wool not exceeding 2£ inches long, and "21 percent.," several times named in this volume, probably never excelled in the proportion of wool to meat, yields wool 2f inches long. CHAPTER VIH. THE SAME SUBJECT CONTINUED. YOLK CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF YOLK ITS USES PROPER AMOUNT AND CONSISTENCY OP IT ITS COLOR COLORING SHEEP ARTIFICIALLY — ARTIFICIAL PROPAGATION AND PRES- ERVATION OF YOLK. YOLK. — This is that .oily feeling fluid, or that sticky, pasty or half-hardened substance, within the wool, or that hard substance on the outer ends of the wool, which commonly receives the name of oil, grease, or gum. These appellations are obvious misnomers when we take its chemical constituents into consideration. CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF YOLK. — Vauquelin, a celebrated French chemist, found that various specimens of yolk con- tained about the same constituents: — 1. A soapy matter with a basis of potash, which formed a greater part of it. 2. A small quantity of carbonate of potash. 3. A perceptible quantity of acetate of potash. 4. Lime, whose state of combination he was unacquainted with. 5. An atom of muriate of potash. 6. An animal oil, to which he attributed the peculiar odor of yolk. He found the yolk of French and Spanish Merinos essentially the same. He assumed that the yolk in sheared wool injures it after a few months, if not scoured out. USES OF YOLK. — Yolk has been believed in all countries and times to promote the growth of wool and render it soft, pliant and healthy. It seems to me to have other and obvious uses.* The small, irregular -shaped masses of wool which adhere together in the unshorn fleece of the Merino sheep, and which are bounded externally by visible, permanent cracks, * I suggested these uses in my Report on Fine -Wool Husbandry, made in February, 1862. 78 PROPER AMOUNT AND CONSISTENCY OF YOLK. slide on each other with every movement of the animal ; so that, in effect, the cracks are the joints of the fleece. If dry and unlubricated by the yolk, the friction of these sliding masses would, on the sides subjected to abrasion, wear or break off the tooth -like processes on the wool on which the felting property depends ; and this same effect would follow, whether to a greater or lesser degree, I am unable to say, on those coarse open fleeces in which, as in the covering of hairy animals, there is no such massing of the fibers and each slides separately on the surrounding ones. Again: if the wool was uulubricated, heavy rains, and the contact of the sheep witli each other, with the ground and other substances, would cause felting on the back — a result now sometimes witnessed to a limited extent, and termed " cotting." PROPER AMOUNT AND CONSISTENCY OF YOLK. — Different opinions are entertained of the amount of yolk it is profitable to propagate in wool. If the fleece is sold unwashed, and according to the present general mode, at a fixed rate of shrinkage on that account, it is obviously the interest of the wool grower to produce as much yolk as is consistent with the greatest united production of wool and yolk. And even if wool is sold nominally "washed," it is evident that the same amount of washing will leave very yolky fleeces heavier than unyolky ones. Farmers have learned that if they can only say their wool is washed — no matter how washed — ten or fifteen per cent, more yolk than would be left by thorough washing, Avill not cause any corresponding deduction in the price. There are a class of experienced buyers, certainly, who do not purchase in this indiscriminate way, but as the wool business has constantly expanded and opened new oppor- tunities for the profitable investment of money, every year brings its fresh horde of raw, eager buyers — the agents of manufacturers or speculators, or persons speculating on their own account — and some of these always take the heavy, dirty wools at about the price of the clean ones. I shall allude to this topic again under subsequent heads. I esteem it particularly fortunate for the preservation of the intrinsic value of our Merino sheep, and fortunate for the public interest, that it is already incontestibly ascertained that the greatest amount of yolk is not consistent either with the greatest amount of wool, or with the greatest aggregate amount of both yolk and wool. The black, miserably "oily," " gummy" sheep, looking as if their wool had been soaked* to PROPEB AMOUNT AND CONSISTENCY OF WOOL. 79 saturation in half inspissated oil, and then daubed over extern- ally with a coating of tar and lamp-black, never exhibit that maximum of both length and density of wool which, with a proper degree of yolk, produces the greatest aggregate weight. Yolk has been generally thought to be the pabulum of wool and if so, its excessive secretions, as a separate substance, may diminish its secretions in the form of wool. Be this as it may, the fact I have stated stands without an exception. And animals exhibiting this marked excess of yolk, are invariably feebler in constitution, less easily kept, and especially less capable of withstanding sevei'e cold. Such excessive secre- tions appear, then, to cause, or else to be the results of an abnormal or defective organization. For these reasons, these comparatively worthless animals, ortce so eagerly sought, have already gone out of use among the best informed breeders; and where they linger, it is, like antiquated fashions, in regions where the current ideas of the day penetrate slowly ! There should be enough fluid yolk within the wool on the upper surfaces of the body, to cover every fiber like a brilliant, and, in warm weather, like an undried coat of varnish — but not enough to fill the interstices between them, so that the fleece shall appear, as it sometimes does, to be growing up through a bed of oil. And if there is a sufficiency of yolk above, it must be expected that underneath where the fleece is less exposed to evaporation and the washing of rains, and to which part gravitation would naturally determine a fluid substance, a considerably greater quantity of it will be found. But hardened or pasty masses of it within the wool are to be avoided, on all parts of the body. A portion of the fluid yolk will necessarily inspissate or harden on the outer ends of the wool. It is proper that it should sensibly thicken those ends, and clot them together in small masses on the upper parts of the body — forming a coat considerably thicker, firmer and harder to the hand than would the naked wool, and quite rigid when exposed to cold; but it should not cover the wool in rounded knobs, or in thick, firmly adhering patches, bounded by the fleece cracks — sticking to the hand in hot weather like a compound of grease and tar, and in cold having a "board-like" stiffness. Underneath, for the same reasons given in reference to inside yolk, a greater quantity of it must be tolerated. It should stick the masses of wool together in front of the brisket and scrotum, and large rounded knobs of it inside the legs and thighs and on the back side of the scrotum, are considered desirable. 80 PKOPEB COLOK OF YOLK. COLOB OF YOLK. — The external yolk is occasionally somewhat yellowish — of the tinge of dirty bees -wax — but more generally of some dark shade of brown, or what would more commonly be termed black. The darker color is preferred. All American Merino sheep having what is esteemed a sufficient amount of yolk, become very dark colored each year before the winter is far advanced, if they are housed from summer and winter storms after shearing. Rains wash away the yolk and with it the color. But the yolk is soluble in different degrees in different families, and even on different animals of the same flock. The Paular (Rich) sheep hold their color uncommonly well ; the French rapidly bleach. It has been supposed that the black color is communicated to external yolk by dust, the pollen of hay, etc. These may contribute to the result, but I have recently learned from entirely reliable persons, who house their sheep in summer, that if kept entirely dry, they never assume their darkest color — that to obtain this, they must be exposed to dews, light sprinkles of rain, or the contents of the watering pot. The change in color, accordingly, is partly chemical. Internal yolk varies in color from a pure white to a deep yellow. It has been rather the fashion, in this country, since the days of the Saxon sheep, to breed for the former, and this is the prevailing color in the American Paulars. The breeders of the American Infantados, and of the Silesians, generally follow the old Spanish custom of giving preference to shades of yellow. A brilliant "golden tinge," faint or imperceptible near the roots of the wool, but deepening towards its outer extremities, is the one sought after. The founder of the improved Infantado family has, as already stated, bred steadily for that color; and he has done so not merely as a matter of taste, but under the impression that it betokens a vigorous growth of wool and general vigor of constitution — and particularly vigor of that kind, which exhibits itself in the forcible transmission of individual properties to progeny. But this "golden tinge" is not to be mistaken for the deep saffron yellow which attends cotting — or for a dull, dead yellow — or for a tawny bees- wax hue — or for the hue of "nankeen" cloth, sometimes seen in imperfectly bred animals. The favorite color among the French breeders is a creamy one. In answer to inquiries made by me, in 1862, several experienced manufacturers — all I consulted— concurred in the statement that the color of the yolk is not, in itself, a matter of any consequence, in reference COLORING SHEEP ARTIFICIALLY. 81 to any of the objects of manufacturing ; and that its quantity and consistency are only important in so far as they affect its weight and cause a loss in scouring. I have been speaking of the natural color of yolk. In many regions where sheep are not pastured on thoroughly sodded ground, the whole interior of the fleece becomes stained by dust to the prevailing color of the ground. This often occurs on our Western prairies. COLORING SHEEP ARTIFICIALLY. — To give Merinos des- titute of it, a dark external color, they are sometimes painted. A coating of linseed oil and burnt umber, slightly darkened with lamp-black, neatly applied within a few weeks after shearing, can be distinguished from the natural dark coat of a housed sheep with some difficulty, by inexperienced eyes. But generally the sheep jockey overdoes the thing and excels nature ! He lays on the coat more evenly and more uniformly dark. It is said there are other preparations, with or without coloring matter, intended to give the fleece a thick, firm feeling, but I have not learned their composition. It is not necessary to remark that all such practices are rank frauds. ARTIFICIAL PROPAGATION AND PRESERVATION OF YOLK. — Yolk is greatly increased in the fleece by high keep; and careful housing in summer, as well as winter, as I have repeatedly remarked, preserves it there. The objects and effects of these practices will be alluded to hereafter. CHAPTER IX. ADAPTATION OF BEEEDS TO DIFFERENT SITUATIONS. MARKETS - CLIMATE - VEGETATION - SOILS - NUMBER OF SHEEP TO BE KEPT - ASSOCIATED BRANCHES OF HUS- BANDRY. PERSONS desirous of engaging in Sheep Husbandry are frequently at a loss to decide what breed of sheep is best adapted to their particular wants and circumstances. The first and leading point to determine is whether it would be most profitable to make mutton the prime consideration and wool the accessory — or wool the prime consideration and mutton the accessory. If the first conclusion is adopted, some of the improved English mutton varieties are undoubtedly to be preferred ; if the last, the Merino has no competitor. MARKETS. — Where other circumstances equally admit of either husbandry, it is the market that determines which product is most profitable to the producer. Wool has a vastly greater and more universal consumption than mutton, because it is a prime necessary of life to every man outside the tropical zone. As such a necessary, it can never find any practical substitutes. Mutton is not a necessary of life, although it is made to contribute largely towards one — human food. It readily admits of substitutes. It is scarcely used by large classes of men and even by whole nations. Yet it is demonstrable that it can be produced more cheaply than any other meat. No meat, not even the choicest of beef, is more palatable to those accustomed to its use ; and none is more nutritious and healthful. The prize-fighter, whose success depends upon the perfect integrity of all his physical tissues and functions, is as often trained on mutton as on beef; the physician as often recommends it to the invalid. And finally, it wastes less than beef in being converted into food.* Every- ny M ReP°rt on SheeP Husbandry made to the Mass. Board of Agriculture in r. James S. Grennell, thus condenses the results of various experiments MUTTON MARKET OF UNITED STATES. 83 thing therefore marks it as one of the most valuable articles of human consumption ; and where its use is once established, there is no one which finds a steadier demand or more uniformly remunerating prices. In England mutton is the favorite animal food from the peer to the peasant — the former preferring the choicer qualities as a matter of taste, the latter the cheaper and fatter ones as a matter of economy. A pound of Leicester mutton which has an external coating of fat as thick as that on well fattened pork, will go as far to support life as a pound of pork, eaten simply in the condition of cooked meat ; and eaten partly as meat and used partly to convert vegetables into soups having the flavor and to some extent the nutritive qualities of meat, it will not only produce more palatable nutriment than the pork, but nutriment capable of being distributed so as to supply more wants. Thirty or forty years ago but very little mutton was consumed in the United States. Our people had not learned to eat it. Colonizing a new country covered with forests containing animals that prey on sheep, and in which the necessary labor for guarding them was scarce and high, our forefathers kept only enough to meet pressing wants for wool for household uses. Few were used for food, and the early sheep of our country did not constitute very palatable food. Beef and pork were more easily grown and better relished. This state of things continued until mutton became a stranger to American tables. When at length the country became better adapted to the production of sheep, there was no call for mutton. I can myself remember when it was rarely seen and never habitually used on the table, except perhaps in cheap school boarding-houses of the "Dotheboy's Hall" order. This prejudice continued until the comparatively recent general introduction of the improved English mutton sheep — and until fashion in cities, for once, inaugurated a great and useful change in the public taste. Some of the earlier preju- dices yet linger among our rural population ; yet the same change is making its way, not slowly, into the country. The first quality of mutton now commands a higher price in our on this subject: "English chemists and philosophers, by a series of careful experi- ments, find that 100 Ibs. of beef, in boiling, lose 26% Ibs., in roasting, 32 Ibs., and in baking 30 Ibs. by evaporation and loss of soluble matter, juices, water and fat. Mutton lost by boiling 21 Ibs., and by roasting 24 Ibs. ; or in another form of statement, a leg of mutton costing raw, 15 cents, would cost boiled and prepared for the table, 18)£ cents a pound ; boiled fresh beef would, at the same price, cost 19K cents per pound, sirloia of beef raw, at \&A cents, costs roasted 24 cents, while a leg of mutton at 15 cents, would cost roasted only 22 cents." 84 MUTTON MARKET OF UNITED STATES. markets than the first quality of beef. The extent and rapidity of the change in our cities receives a striking illustration from the following facts stated in Mr. GrennelFs Report to the Massachusetts Board of Agriculture, 1860: " At Brighton (near Boston,) on the market day previous to Christmas, 1839, two Franklin county men held 400 sheep, every one in the market, and yet so ample was that supply, and so inactive the demand, that they could not raise the market half a cent a pound, and finally sold with difficulty ;" and "just twenty years after that, at the same place, on the market day previous to Christmas, 1859, five thousand four hundred sheep changed from the drover to the butcher." The history of Boston in this respect is but the history of all oiir larger cities, towns and villages. When this taste fully extends to our rural population — when our laboring farmers learn, as they ought to learn and will learn, that eating fat pork all the year round is not most conducive to health and to an enlarged general economy — when they acquire the habit, as they so conveniently could, of killing mutton habitually for household and neighborhood consump- tion in its fresh state* — our people, now the greatest consumers of animal food among the civilized nations of the world, will become by far the greatest consumers of mutton in the world. I doubt whether the enormous amount which will be annually grown and consumed in this country, within fifty years, has yet occurred to our most sanguine advocates of mutton sheep. It is a fixed fact, thoroughly settled by the experience of England, and beginning to be well understood in extensive regions of our country, that where the market for mutton is large and near by, and the local circumstances are favorable to its culture, its production, if well understood and conducted, is more profitable as a leading object, than the production of wool. The Merino was introduced into England under the most favorable auspices, and its propagation fostered by kingly example and encouragement. But neither as a wool sheep proper, nor when bred into what may be termed a half mutton sheep, has it been able to compete at all successfully with the pure mutton breeds. Where the soils and surround- ings are suitable, it is already becoming more profitable (in * The frequent killing of beeves on farms, to be eaten fresh, is not convenient on account of their size. In warm weather, the meat could not usually be disposed of without salting down, unless the farmer should change his occupation to that of a traveling meat peddler. It is not so with the sheep. Three or four farmers could join together to buy all the meat, or to kill alternately and divide the carcass. CrfMATE ADAPTED TO DIFFERENT BREEDS. 85 ordinary times, when the natural conditions of the market are not unsettled by war,) to grow first-class mutton sheep throughout most of New England, excepting Vermont and the northern halves of New Hampshire and Maine — throughout the eastern portions of New York and Pennsylvania — and throughout a belt of country round every city and village, wider or narrower according to its population — than it is to grow the wool sheep proper. And this area of mutton production must steadily increase, pushing back wool production further from the sea-board and from all dense aggregations of population. While the preceding facts, in my opinion, admit of no reasonable question, it is nevertheless equally true that the demand for wool in the United States is, as I shall presently show, far less adequately supplied already with the domestic product — and that this demand must of absolute necessity go on increasing forever in the same ratio with the increase of our entire population — so that, in the aggregate, the amount of land and other capital, which can be profitably invested in its production will always exceed that which can be profitably invested in mutton production, in the proportion of almost hundreds to one. Our vast interior regions, with the exceptions already indicated in the vicinity of cities, and with certain others which it is not necessary to specify here — in other words, all regions remote from meat markets or from which the transportation to such markets is distant or expensive — can be more profitably devoted to the production of wool as a leading object than mutton. It will be seen from all the foregoing that there is, properly speaking, no competition whatever between the mutton growing and the wool growing sheep — that their respective profitableness is purely a question of place and some other circumstances which I am about to name — and that to raise that question abstractly, and independently of these local and other considerations, as is often done, is almost as irrelevant and unmeaning as it would be to ask which is the most profitable mode of transportation, ships or locomo- tives, without having reference to the fact whether such transportation must be made by land or water. I will now proceed to examine the other qualifying local circumstances, besides those of market. CLIMATE. — The English improved mutton sheep in its present perfect development of all the points which constitute 86 VEGETATION ADAPTED TO DIFFERENT BREEDS. a matchless meat-producing animal, is in some part a product of the temperate, uniform and moist climate of England. It has withstood the effects of acclimation in the United States successfully, but it requires more care and shelter and is not so well adapted to our habitual extremes of heat and cold as the hardier Merino.* Exposed without good, adequate shelter to rapid and excessive variations of temperature, it is subject to colds which tend to various diseases, both of inflammatory and typhoid types : and, at best, it wilts and withers away. It is not adapted to very cold or very warm climates for another reason — on account of the influence they exert on vegetation. But its sustentation will be considered under another head. The Merino endures vicissitudes and extremes of weather better than any other sheep which approximates to it in value. Its range of habitation extends throughout the temperate zone. It will flourish wherever the ox or the horse will flourish; but, like those animals, thrives better for some degree of winter shelter anywhere, and demands it in regions of severe cold, and especially in those where humidity and cold are liable to follow each other rapidly. VEGETATION. — The English breeds of sheep require abundant and steady supplies of food properly or profitably to develop their peculiar value as mutton sheep — viz., their fattening properties and early maturity. They are therefore unadapted to regions where the summer is hot enough to dry up the vegetation, as on the plains of Texas and Southern Spain — or regions subject to periodical drouths, like Australia and the Cape of Good Hope — or those where vegetation is locked up by long and rigorous winters, as in various northern inhabited regions of both hemispheres. For the scarcity of succulent food produced by summer drouth, there can be no adequate reparation to these hearty and gross feeding animals. For the long and severe winter, there may be sufficient extra provision made in grain and roots : and where land is comparatively cheap, and mutton in good demand, that extra provision can be profitably made. These are the conditions of New York and New England as mutton producing countries. England presents far more favorable natural, and, in many respects, artificial conditions, for its * I do not of course here include among the improved English mutton sheep, the mack -faced Scotch or Heath Sheep, or the Cheviots, though I enumerated them among the English sheep which are residents of the United States. VEGETATION ADAPTED TO DIFFERENT BREEDS. 87 production, but still the greatly higher cost of land there, more than counterbalances those advantages on the score of actual and direct profit to the grower. While all the mutton sheep are abundant consumers, there is a difference in them in this particular, and in the quality of the food they require. Speaking generally, the long-wools require the richest and most abundant pasturage, and they will consume ranker herbage than would be adapted to upland breeds, or to the Merino. They are much less inclined to travel or work for their food. They are therefore, properly, low-land sheep. Their place is rather the rich, moist plain, than the dry hill- side. The Leicester is the tenderest and the least disposed to work of all. The Cotswold is perhaps the hardiest and best worker of the long-Svools which I have described, and thrives on low, moist hills, like those from which it derives its name.* Judging from its blood, the New Oxfordshire should occupy an intermediate place between the two preceding families. All the Down families are hardy and possess good working qualities. In England they are regarded as an upland sheep, adapted to dry and comparatively scanty pasturage when necessary. But this is to be understood with qualifications, in the United States. The words " upland " and " dry," as applied to pasturage, have very different significations from their English ones, in our land of lofty hills and mountains, and of dry, scorching summers. As a hard working sheep — as a sheep adapted to very scanty, or dried up, or poor pasturage, — none of the heavy English mutton breeds can compare with the Merino. The latter, indeed, work for their food of preference. Where they have an opportunity to choose, they will invariably desert the rich valley a considerable portion of each day to climb the lofty hill -side, and they love to clamber about its steep declivities and among rocks, to crop the scattered tufts of grass, and browse on those bushes and weeds which they are fond of mingling with their food. They have not, in these particulars, been bred away as far from the natural habits of the species as the English sheep. Their annual sojourn among the mountains of Spain, until a comparatively recent period, preserved these habits. From an observation of these facts, it has been inferred that the Merino requires short verdure, and a considerable variety of it. It is probable, on chemical considerations, that, other things being equal, several kinds of food will furnish * The Cotswold Hills are iu Gloucestershire, England. 88 SOILS ADAPTED TO DIFFERENT BREEDS. more of the constituents of wool than will a single kind — and consequently that a variety in it, tends to the development of a heavier fleece. But abundance and richness of food, when the Merino is compelled to accept them, affect its tissues as they do those of all other sheep, and more than compensate for the want of variety. Removed from the pastures of NCAV England, or of North -eastern, Eastern and Southern New York — grazing lands proper — to the rich clover fields of Western New York, Ohio, etc., the Merino increases considerably, both in size and weight of wool — and it continues equally healthy. SOILS. — The fertility of the soil is a consideration of weight in selecting a breed of sheep to stock it, because on that fertility depends the luxuriance, and, to some extent, the quality of its vegetation. Its nature and condition in other respects are also important. Habitual wetness of the ground, from whatever cause it arises, is highly injurious to most kinds of sheep, and particularly to upland ones. The Merino cannot endure it; and wool growing can never be profitably pursued on such lands. That mutton growing can, is abundantly proved by the example of the English farmers in Lincolnshire, Kent, etc. In such situations, the long- wooled sheep are decidedly preferable. It is thought, in England, that an occasional or even single visit to some fen or stagnant pool sometimes communicates the fatal rot* to flocks of sheep. I never have heard of an instance of this in the United States. In our Northern and Eastern States I never have known the most free access to swamps, pools, etc., to prove injurious to sheep, provided they had abundant pasturage and pure water without, and only entered the marshy lands voluntarily, as all sheep will occasionally do in quest of a change of food. Constant access to salt-marshes is considered actually promotive of their health and thrift. I have received various accounts of fatal disorders attacking sheep in Texas, in consequence of being kept on what are termed hog-wallow prairies — low, flat, moist, very rich lands. I should expect such results in large flocks restricted to such lands, in all our warm climates; and such pasturages would be decidedly uncongenial to all the short-wooled varieties of sheep, in any climate. * I speak of liver rot, not hoof rot. The names are sometimes confounded in our ^Northern States where the former disease is mostly unknown. HERDING OF DIFFERENT BREEDS. 89 A very light, sandy or other soil which rises readily in clouds of dust, when not well sodded over, is unfavorable to the cleanliness and beauty of wool — yet some healthy and profitable sheep ranges have this fault. A gravelly loam, or other soil of about equal consistency, readily permeable to surface water, thoroughly drained, abounding m clear, rapid -flowing brooks, elevated and free from malarious influences, dotted with groves or clusters of shade trees, and of about medium fertility, combines the conditions preferred by the Merino. The same conditions would as well meet the wants of the Downs ; and greater fertility would not be objectionable to them. Lower and moister soils of the richest quality are congenial to the long-wools. THE NUMBER OF SHEEP TO BE KEPT. — Mutton sheep consume more, demand a greater variety of artificial feed, and greatly more care than Merinos, and therefore are better adapted to small, high-priced farms, where it is desirable to invest as much capital in sheep as can be rendered remunerative. But the long-wooled families would be wholly unadapted to large farms, where surplus capital is wanting, even were there not a difficulty of another kind. They do not herd well — that is, thrive well when kept together in large numbers. The Down families herd much better, but still do not compare with the Merinos in this respect. In Australia and Texas, a thousand or more Merinos often run in the same flock, summer and winter, throughout the year, occupying the same pastures by day and the same folds by night. And my friend, George Wilkins Kendall, of Texas, used playfully to insist to me that in his Merino flocks of that number, he could not find one poor enough to make palatable mutton ! His flocks passed through the terrible winter of 1860 without artificial feed or shelter — when the cold was severer than ever before known in that climate, and when it so arrested the growth of grass tha*- his sheep daily traveled four or five miles from their folds to obtain food; — and he did not lose scarcely one per cent, of their number ! A large number of mutton sheep may be kept on the same farm with a sufficient division of the fields and winter shelters ; but they cannot profitably or safely be kept together in large flocks. ASSOCIATED BRANCHES OF HUSBANDRY. — Economy de- mands that for the most profitable production of mutton 90 SHEEP WITH OTHER HUSBANDRY. there should be associated with it a proportionable amount of1 convertible husbandry. Mutton sheep demand grain, roots, etc., in large quantities, and in return they supply all the necessary fertilizing materials for those crops. These fertilizers are comparatively wasted if not devoted to those crops. Each husbandry, then, is necessary to the highest profitableness of the other. Without such union, neither the present admirable system of British agriculture, nor the present maximum of population which derives its sustentation from that agriculture, could be kept up. The adaptation of the soil and other circumstances to convertible husbandry, the tastes or wishes of the flock-master in regard to embarking in it in connection with mutton growing, and the local market for its products, all become, therefore auxiliary considerations of weight in choosing between mutton and wool growing. I have aimed to present, Avith impartiality, the principal circumstances which determine the adaptability of different kinds of sheep to different situations. There are, however, generally more or less minor ones in every man's case, knoAvn only to himself, which somewhat qualify the influence of the major ones ; and of -these he must be his own sole judge. In closing this branch of my subject, I will only further add that while, in selecting a breed of sheep, every one should keep his eyes firmly fixed on the primary object of production, he never should altogether lose sight of the accessory one. The mutton sheep would probably be nowhere profitable without its wool, and the wool sheep would be much less profitable without its mutton. CHAPTER X. PEOSPEOTS AND PEOFITS OP WOOL AND MUTTON PEODUCTION IN THE UNITED STATES, THE subjoined table of the Prices of Wool, in one of the principal Wool Markets of the United States, extending through thirty- eight years — through the most disastrous revulsions in the money market and in the prices of all kinds of property — under tariffs which have at one period given excessive protection to our woolen manufactures, and at others abandoned them unaided to the competition of Europe — presents the best proof I possess, nay, the most unan- swerable proof possible, of the steady remunerativeness of wool production. It was prepared for me in 1862, from his own books and those of his predecessors in the same firm, by George Livermore, Esq., of Boston, one of the most eminent Avool commission merchants ever in the United States — and his name is an ample guaranty of its accuracy. It has now been published a year, and has circulated throughout the trade without one of its figures being questioned.* I have added a column to it indicating the tariff laws in force at the different periods, but there is not space here to give even a synopsis of those tariffs.f The average and not the extreme prices for each quarter are given, and it will be observed that these are not given strictly by quarters anterior to 1827. I have learned, from various reliable sources, that from 1800 to 1807, wool bore low prices in our country; that in 1807 and 1808 full-blood Merino wool sold for $1 a pound; that in 1809, it rose to about $2 a pound, and so continued through the war against England, commenced in 1812 — some choice lots fetching $2.50 a pound ; that when our infant * It was published in my Report on Fine -Wool Husbandry, in 18C2; and in the Boston trade publications which would place it in the hands of all the leading wool merchants and manufacturers. t A complete synopsis of them is given in my Report on Fine-Wool Husbandry, TABLE OF WOOL PRICES. manufactories were overthrown at the close of that war, in 1815, it again sunk to a low price, and so remained until the Tariff of 1824 was enacted. PRICES CURRENT OF WOOL IN BOSTON. Tariff and time of taking effect. June 30. •s. Sept. 1. "3 fa March 3. £ Dec, 31. I Year. Quarter ending 1824 January, Fine. Medium. OOOTBO. March 70 45 33 f*\y, ::::::::'.:::: :::::::::" October, ... . .... . 60 40 45 30 33 60 April, July, October 1826. January, 40 27 33 28 30 26 25 25 28 33 31 35 30 30 27 30 32 40 47 47 60 60 50 45 40 30 30 April, 62 45 30 38 33 36 31 32 30 36 40 40 45 35 35 31 35 50 60 60 60 63 60 55 50 40 40 June, ...... .. .... 37 October, ... .. .... 44 37 April, 44 July, 36 42 April, .. 44 July, 48 October, ..... . 47 55 April, 43 July 38 1830. January, 40 October, 70 April 70 July, 75 October, 70 65 April 60 July 60 50 1833. January, April. 55 55 60 55 50 50 M 58 58 58 58 58 60 60 60 60 40 42 42 87 42 45 47 42 40 40 40 45 45 45 45 45 50 50 50 50 33 35 36 82 July, 62 October, 65 1834. January, 70 April, 65 July, ... eo October, . . 60 1835. January,. 60 April, . 65 July/. 65 October, 65 1836. January, 65 April, . 65 July, 70 October, 70 70 April, July, October, 50 1838. January, . ..... 60 April,... 50 July, ... 45 TABLE OF WOOL PEICES. Tariff and time of taking effect. Year. Quarter ending Fine. Medium. 48 Coarse. 37 1839. January, . ... .. . 65 48 38 April, . . . 55 48 38 July, 58 60 40 October, 60 62 46 1840. January, 60 45 April, 48 41 36 July, 46 38 S3 46 38 33 1841. January 62 45 87 April, 52 45 37 October 1. October, 60 48 44 41 35 S3 1842. January, 48 43 35 '"-"oS April, 46 42 33 £°3 July, . 43 38 31 October, 37 31 26 1843. January 85 30 25 April, 34 29 25 October, .. 35 39 30 32 26 26 . 1844. January 37 31 26 1 April 45 37 30 July 45 37 81 0 October 60 42 83 M 1845. January, 45 38 31 I April, 45 40 38 35 33 30 Serv:::::::;:::::::::::::::: 38 34 28 1846. January, April, 40 38 35 33 30 28 July, 38 33 28 Dec 1 October 36 30 22 1847. January, 47 38 30 April, 47 40 31 July, 47 40 31 October, ... 47 40 30 1848. January 45 38 30 April, 43 37 30 July, 88 33 33 30 28 22 1849. January, 30 23 April, 42 36 30 July, ... 40 35 28 October 42 36 SO 1850. January, 47 40 33 April 45 38 31 45 88 32 35 1851. January, 37 32 April, 50 44 40 o? July, 47 42 37 1 October, 45 40 83 "3 1852. January, ApriL 42 37 36 32 31 to July, ....... ........ ....... . 45 38 32 October, JR.. 50 42 37 EH 1853. January, 68 65 60 April, 62 65 50 Julv,- 60 53 48 October, . 65 60 48 1854. January, 63 47 42 April, 57 62 44 July, 45 37 30 41 36 32 1855. January, 40 35 32 94 TABLE OF WOOL TKICES. Tariff and time of taking effect. year. Quarter ending Fine. 60 .....:. 62 1856. January, 60 67 July, 60 1857 January, 68 April, 60 July, 66 October :":::: sa 1858. January, 40 April, .42 • July 1 65 1859. January, 60 5; April, 60 July, 66 •£ October,... 60 IH 1860. January, 60 April, .... .. -. 52 July, 55 October, 50 1861. January, . 45 April 1 r April, 45 July, . . ... . .. 40 £*=? October, 47 Medium, Coarse. From the beginning of 1827, from which the above prices present the averages of each quarter, to the close of 1861, a period of 35 years, the average price of fine wool was 50 3-10 cents; of medium, 42 8-10 cents; of coarse, 35£ cents. Fine wool averaged 15 per centum higher than medium, and medium 14 per centum higher than coarse. The wools classed in the table as fine, included Saxon, grade Saxon, and choice lightish -fleece American Merino ; the medium included American Merino and grade down, say to half blood; the coarse included wools one -fourth blood Merino and below. Each of these classes, of course, embraced wools of various qualities and prices. The lessons to be derived from this table are most valuable to the wool grower. How very striking, for example, is the fact that during thirty- eight years — and with all the disturbing causes to the wool market which have been alluded to — there has not been a single year in which the average prices for the wools marked medium in the table would not now paylhe actual cost of producing our heavy fleeced American Merino wools; and that there have not been more than half a dozen years, when those prices would not be decently remunerative ! Of the production of how many other of our great staples of industry can as much be said? A-tfD EXPORTS OF WOOL. g. g- g- §• g- g- g- §•§• g- g- g- g- g- g- §•§•§• I g- g* iiiii : : : : : J» Hil a t OO C^ I-* OS 00 I i on U< M & Cn F - JXj-l^COjTij-'^'-'.^-JC. -ij-tjC -i.ir injz; ;-.p,JO^OJ»i-'jO 95 is gg DEMAND AND SUPPLY OF WOOL. Will this steady demand and these remunerating prices last? Here again the facts and figures of the past afford the most trustworthy answer. The table on preceding page was prepared for me in 1862, by the acting Register of the Treasury. It is thus made to appear that during the twenty-two years which preceded the present war, our imports of unman- ufactured wool exceeded our exports of the home -grown article in the value of $44,514,771, or upwards of two millions a year; and that during the same period, our imports of manufactured wool exceeded our exports of domestic manufactured wool in the value of $429,422,951, or upwards of nineteen millions a year ! There have been during the above period several "manias," as they have been termed, as strong as that of 1862 -'63, to increase wool production in our country; yet, in spite of all contemporary predictions to the contrary, we see how utterly they failed in every instance to bring up, even temporarily, the supply to the demand. When eveiy circumstance is taken into account, there cannot be a reasonable doubt entertained, that the United States can permanently furnish its own markets with a full supply of wool more cheaply than other countries can furnish it. I have not space here for the numerous facts and statistics which go to prove this assertion; nor is there need of it, they have been so fully set forth and discussed in a multitude of popular publications, particularly in those invaluable disseminators of information, our Agricultural Journals. Indeed, we might even compete with other countries in supplying wool to Europe. And yet, with such facts staring us in the face, there are so many other demands for capital, labor and enterprise in our country, that we continue and are likely to continue, no one can say how long, vast importers of one of the prime necessaries of life ! Sheep are not only the most profitable animals to depasture the cheap lands of our country — the mountain ranges of the South, and the vast plains of the West and South-west — but they are also justly beginning to be considered an absolute necessity of good farming on our choice grain -growing soils, where wheat, clover seed, etc., are staples. I may be permitted to quote the two following paragraphs from my Report on Fine -Wool Husbandry, 1862: — "Sheep would be more profitable than cows on a multitude of the ADVANTAGES OF SHEEP HUSBANDRY. 97 high, thin -soiled dairy farms of New York; and every person who has kept the two animals ought to know that sheep will enrich such lands far more rapidly than cows. On the imperfectly cleared and briery lands of our grazing regions, sheep will more than pay for their summer keep, for several years, merely in clearing and cleaning up the land. They effectually exterminate the blackberry (Rubus villosus et trivialis,) and raspberry (Rubus strigosus et occidentalis,} the common pests in such situations, and they banish or prevent the spread of many other troublesome shrubs and weeds. They also, unlike any other of our valuable domestic animals, exert a direct and observable influence in banishing coarse, wild, poor grasses from their pastures and bringing in the sweeter and more nutritious ones-" It was a proverb of the Spaniards: — "Wherever the foot of the sheep touches, the land is turned into gold." " And the growth of wool is peculiarly adapted to the pecuniary means and the circumstances of a portion of our rural population. Their capital is mostly in land. Hired labor is costly. Sheep husbandry will render all their cleared land profitably productive at a less annual expenditure for labor than any other branch of farming. By reason of the rapid increase of sheep, and the great facility of promptly improving inferior ones, they will stock a farm well, more expeditiously, and with far less outlay, than other animals. And, lastly, the ordinary processes and manipulations of sheep husbandry are simple and readily acquired. On no other domestic animal is the hazard of loss by death so small. It is as healthy and hardy as other animals, and unlike all the others, if decently managed, a good sheep can never die in the debt of man. If it dies at birth, it has consumed nothing. If it dies the first whiter, its wool will pay for its consumption up to that period. If it lives to be sheared once, it brings its owner into debt to it, and if the ordinary and natural course of wool production and breeding goes on, that indebtedness will increase uniformly and with accelerating rapidity until the day of its death. If the horse or the steer die at three or four years old, or the cow before breeding, the loss is almost a total one." The cost of producing wool depends upon that of keeping sheep, and this necessarily varies greatly in different situations. On the highest priced lands in New York and New England on which sheep are now usually kept for wool growing purposes, it, under judicious systems of winter 6 98 PROFITS OF WOOL PRODUCTION. management, reaches about $2 a head per annum. In extensive regions of the South and South-west it is mainly comprised in the expense of herding, salting, and shearing, and where the number of sheep kept is large, does not exceed 25 cents a head. But it would be more profitable in those regions to provide some kind of shelter and give a little feed in the height of winter, and this would increase the cost of keeping to 50 cents a head. In some of our Western and North-western States, where sheep can have the run of lands belonging to the Government or to non-resident owners, in addition to those owned by the flock- master, the cost of keeping, including winter shelter, ranges from, say, 75 cents to $1 a head. In intermediate situations, between the densely populated and high-priced lands of the East and the broad, sparsely inhabited prairies of the West and South- west, (open without price to the temporary occupant,) and between the warm South where vegetation flourishes almost throughout the year, and the cold North where winter feeding lasts from five to five and a half months, the cost of keeping will occupy every intermediate place between these extremes. Every experienced and sensible man acquainted with all the special circumstancs, is the best judge of that cost in his own locality. Improved Merino flocks of breeding ewes should average five pounds of washed wool per head in large flocks. Medium wool has sold on an average for 42 8-10 cents per pound for the thirty-five years preceding the high prices of the present war. This gives $2.14 to the fleece, which should pay for the cost of keeping, anywhere, and leave the owner the lambs and manure for his profit.* The increase of lambs will average about eighty per centum on the whole number of the breeding ewes.f The value of the manure would greatly vary in different situations. It may interest many to know how it is estimated in England. Mr. Spooner says : " Four hundred South Down sheep are sufficient to fold twenty perches per day, or forty -five acres per year, the * If he keeps wethers, he has for his profit their growth and about a dollar from each fleece. Wethers' fleeces should be worth about a dollar a piece more than ewes' fleeces. 1 1 gave this as the average fifteen years ago. With the improvement in sheep shelters, etc., it ought now to be higher. But a few usually fail to get with lamb and occasionally there comes a "dying year" for lambs — when they are born feeble goltred, rheumatic, or subject to some other maladies, so that they perish in extraor- dinary numbers. This was quite generally the case in New York in the spring of 18(12. Taking a term of years together, I doubt whether, under average management, the increase by lambs yet exceeds 80 per cent. PROFITS OF WOOL PRODUCTION". value of which is therefore about £90 per year, or 4s. 6d. per sheep. * * Three hundred sheep have in this manner (with ' a standing fold on some dry and convenient spot, well littered with straw or stubble,') produced eighty large cart- loads of dung between October and March, and in this manner, after the expenses have been deducted, each sheep has earned 3d. per week." A hundred Merino sheep, given abundance of bedding, will, between December 1st and May 1st, make at least forty two -horse loads of manure — and if fed roots, considerably more. I scarcely need to say that both the summer and winter manure of the sheep is far more valuable than that of the horse or cow.* Its manure on high-priced land which requires fertilizers, cannot be estimated at less than 50 cents per head per annum, and I should be inclined to put it still higher. The value of the lambs and manure is the minimum of profit. That profit increases just as the market value of land and the cost of keeping decreases. On the rich plains of the West and South-west, manure is not yet reckoned among the appreciable profits, and the cost of transporting wool to market is from one to two cents per pound. The Western grower, then, gets the lamb and about half the fleece, as the profit on each sheep. The Texan grower gets the lamb and about three-quarters of the fleece, and so on. I do not deduct the extra prices paid from time to time for rams, because each good one vastly more than pays for himself in increasing the value of the flock. The prices of lambs of different blood and in different places, vary too much to admit of even an approximately uniform rate of estimating them. But it does not anywhere cost more to raise a full - blood than a grade Merino lamb. * Horses are not used as depasturing animals in any of the older States. The following remarks appeared in my Report on Fine-Wool Husbandry, 1862 : — " If milch cows are not returned to their pastures at niirht in summer, or the manure made in the night is not returned to the pastures, the difference in the two animals in the particular named in the text, is still greater. Even grazing cattle kept constantly in the pastures, and whose manure is much better than that of dairy cows, are still greatly inferior to the sheep in enriching land. The manure of sheep is stronger, better distributed, and distributed in a way that admits of little loss. The small round pellets soon work down among the roots of the grass, and are in a great measure protected from sun and wind. Each pellet has a coat of mucus which still further protects it. On taking one of these out of the grass, it will be found the moisture is gradually dissolving it on the lower side, directly among the roots, while the upper coated surface remains entire. Finally, if there are hill tops, dry knolls, or elevations of any kind in the pasture, the sheep almost invariably lie on them nights, thus depositing an extra portion of manure on the lenst fertile part of the land, and where the wash of it will be less wasted. The manure of the milch cow, apart from its intrinsic inferiority, is deposited in masses which give up their best contents to the atmosphere before they are dry enough to be beaten to pieces and distributed over the soil." 100 PROFITS OF MUTTOX PKODUCTIOX. Good grades have averaged about $2 per head in the fall for a number of years and the increasing demand for them by the butchers is steadily raising the price. Estimating 80 per cent, of lambs and 50 cents a head for manure, each sheep would thus average in both products $2.10 — just about the equivalent of the fleece ; so that it would be equally well, on high-priced lands requiring fertilizers, to say that the lambs and manure pay the cost of keeping, and the fleece is to be reckoned as the profit. According to the first computation, lands worth $50 per acre would give their owner a profit of seven per cent, if they would support a little over one and three -fifths sheep to the acre; and that would be indifferent grazing land, where the domesticated grasses are grown, and under proper systems of winter keeping, which would not support three sheep to the acre. It would be a very moderate estimate, taking a term of years together, to put full blood American Merino lambs — even from flocks of no especial reputation and not kept for what is technically designated "breeding purposes" — at double the price of grade lambs. They are now worth at least three times as much. The prospect of the future demand for mutton has been sufficiently considered. I had hoped to be able to present an exhibit, in details, of the cost and profits of its production based on actual experiments. But I have been disappointed ; and I will only reiterate the statement that the experience of England, and of portions of our own country, has clearly demonstrated that in regions appropriate for its production, it is a more profitable leading object of production than wool. CHAPTER XI. PBINCIPLES AND PEAOTICE OP BBEEDIUG, BREEDING, in its technical sense, as applied to the reproduction of domesticated animals under the direction of man, is the art of selecting such males and females to procreate together as are best adapted, in conjunction, to produce an improved and uniform offspring. The first and most important fact to be kept in view, in pursuing the object of breeding, is that result of a fixed natural law which is expressed in the phrase, " like produces like." The painted oriole now flashing among the apple blossoms before my Avindow wears the same bright dyes that were worn by the oriole ages ago. But the breeding maxim just quoted, is understood to assert more than that species and varieties continue to reproduce themselves : it implies that the special individual characteristics of parents are also transmitted to progeny. This is the prevailing rule, but it has a broad margin of exceptions and variations. Animals are oftentimes more or less unlike their parents, yet inherit a very distinct resemblance to remoter ancestors — sometimes to those several generations back. This is termed " breeding back." And, moreover, where the resemblance is to the immediate progenitors, the mode of its transmission is not uniform. Sometimes the progeny is strongly like one parent and sometimes like the other ; sometimes, and perhaps oftenest, it bears a modified resemblance to both. The physiological causes or laws which control the hereditary transmission of physical forms and properties — which determine the precise structure which the embryo shall assume in the womb, and give to each animal a distinct individuality which will accompany it through life and distinguish it from every other animal of the same breed and family — have not yet been, and probably never will be, fully understood. Nor can we, by the closest study of analogies or precedents, learn to anticipate their action with 102 PKINCIPLES AND PKACTICE OP BKEEDING. absolute certainty. Yet, by a proper course" of breeding, we can control that action to a considerable degree; we can generally keep it in channels which are favorable to our wishes; we can avoid manifold evils which arise from promiscuous procreation; and a few, more gifted or more zealous in the attainment of their objects than the rest of vte, can make permanent improvements in the forms and properties of our domestic animals, and thus confer important benefits on society. If the male and female parent possess the same given peculiarity of structure, or in breeders' phrase, the same good or bad "point," the chances are very strong that the progeny will also possess it, because the progeny is most likely to inherit the structure of its immediate progenitors ; and whether it receives that portion of the structure from one or the other of them, or partly from both, it still receives the same peculiar form. If all the remoter ancestors also possessed the same point, then the progeny must, in the ordinary course of nature, be sure to inherit it, for let it breed back to whatever ancestor it may, it must inherit the same conformation. This law applies to properties as well as forms. Hence it is that in breeding between pure blood animals of the same breed and family, we find like producing like, so far as the family likeness is concerned, in steady and endless order, and this necessarily includes a good deal of individual likeness. Indeed, it is this long continued preservation and transmission to descendants of the same properties by one family that constitutes "blood," in its technical sense — and its " purity " is its utter isolation from the blood of all other families. The full blood, or pure blood, or thorough-bred animal — for all these terms imply the same thing* — can inherit from its parents, or take from its remoter ancestors by breeding back, only the same family characteristics. But in breeding between mongrels — animals produced by the crossing of different breeds — the closest resemblance of the parents in any point not common to both breeds, does not insure the transmission of their characteristics in that point to their offspring ; for the offspring may obtain different ones by breeding back to either of the ancestors with which the cross commenced, or to some intermediate and partially * At least, as they are used in this volume. An effort has been made in some without1 an iutroduc-e a diatinctioii between these significations, but, in my judgment, PRINCIPLES AND PBACTICE OP BREEDING. 103 assimilated ancestors. This occasional breeding back and consequent divergence from the existing type, is liable to continue for a great number of generations ; and it can only be repressed by a long and uniform course of breeding, and by a rigorous " weeding out " — that is, exclusion from breeding — of every animal exhibiting a tendency toward such divergence. We cannot always, among either pure bloods or mongrels, breed from perfect or approximately perfect individuals, or those which are alike in their structure and properties. Necessity sometimes, and economy frequently, requires us to make use of materials which we would not voluntarily select for the purpose. In such cases, it should always be the aim of the breeder to counteract the imperfection of one parent by the marked excellence of the other parent in the same point. If, for example, a portion of the ewes of a flock are too short- wooled, they should, other things being equal, be coupled with a particularly long-wooled ram. The hereditary predispositions of breeding animals are also to be regarded, as well as their actual existing charac- teristics. In the case just given, if the long-wooled ram was descended from uniformly short-wooled ancestors, his length of wool would be what is termed an " accidental " trait or property; and there would be little probability of his transmitting it with uniformity and force to his offspring out of short-wooled ewes. There would be no certainty of his doing so, even among long-wooled ewes. What are considered accidental characteristics are them- selves generally the result of breeding back to a forgotten ancestor, but sometimes they are purely spontaneous. In such cases, they are exceptions, not to be accounted for by any of the known laws of reproduction. As a general thing they are not transmitted to posterity. In other cases they are feebly transmitted to the first generation and then disappear. But occasionally they are very .vigorously repro- duced, and if cultivated by inter - breeding, the related animals possessing them soon become fixed in their de- scendants apparently as firmly as the old and long -established peculiarities of breed.* The following is an instance of this, * It is claimed that artificial peculiarities even — those produced by external causes after birth — are sometimes inherited, as for example, a limb distorted by accident. To this extent, I suspect the genuine cases of inheritance, are very rare. But habitual artificial properties, and to some extent, structures, marks etc., not unfre- quently become hereditary. If, for example, men or brutes are kept healthy and vigorous for several generations, by proper food and exercise, they will have more vigorous oflspring than the descendants of the same ancestors improperly fed and 104 PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF BREEDING. which, so far as the facts occurred in the United States, fell under my own observation. A ram having ears of not more than a quarter the usual size appeared ill a flock of Saxon sheep, in Germany. He was a superior animal, and got valuable stock. These were inter-bred and a "little-eared" sub -family created.* Some of these found their way into the United States, between 1824 and 1828. One of the rams came into Onondaga County, New York. He was a choice animal, and his owner, David Ely, valued his small ears as a distinctive mark of his blood. He bred a flock by him, and gradually almost bred off their ears entirely. His flock enjoyed great celebrity and popularity in its day, but has long been broken up, and many years have doubtless elapsed since any of the surrounding sheep owners have used a " little - eared " ram. Yet nearly every flock that retains a drop of that blood — even coarse mutton sheep bred away from it, probably for ten or fifteen generations, insomuch that all Saxon characteristics have totally disappeared — still continue to throw out an occasional lamb as distinctly marked with the precise peculiarity under consideration, as Mr. Ely's original stock. Another much more important alledged case in point, is that of the Mauchamp family of Merinos in France. The published accounts of them declare that, in 1828, "a Merino ewe produced a peculiar ram lamb having a different shape from the usual Merino, and possessing a long, straight, silky character of wool," " similar to mohair," and " remarkable for its qualities as a combing wool." Mons. J. L. Graux, the owner of this lamb, bred from him others which resembled him. "In each subsequent year," the account continues, "the lambs were of two kinds, ono possessing the curled, elastic wool of the old Merinos, only a little longer and finer ; the other like the new breed. At last the skillful breeder obtained a flock combining the fine, silky fleece, with a smaller head, broader flanks and more capacious chest." This, excepting in the matter of being "finer" than the Merino, (and I am unable to say what Mons. Graux considers fine,) is a pretty good description of a mongrel between a Merino and some long-wooled variety, — and such I have no enervated by idleness. And as vigor depends upon the volume of the muscle and upon the conformation of both the muscles and general frame, it follows that the shape is measurably controlled by the properties, and that artificial shapes become hereditary. * This was the explanation given me of the origin of these sheep by my lamented friend, the late Henry D. Grove. PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF BREEDING. 105 doubt it is. The "accidental" traits which arc developed in breeding from pure animals of the same blood never, I suspect, at one bound, embrace quite such comprehensive particulars as a change, not only in the essential character- istics of the wool, but also in the general form of the carcass.* But trustworthy cases of the vigorous transmission of accidental properties, involving visible changes, are sufficiently numerous. Involving slight changes or variations, not recognized as such by casual observers, they are more numerous. It is by noting these last, and cultivating the good ones, that the judicious breeder makes some of his best improvements. How otherwise can he possibly raise the progeny, in any given point, above the plane of its parents, and of all its ancestors? But while the breeder should avail himself of every opportunity of this kind to attempt to perpetuate accidental improvements on the pre-existing type, lie must be prepared to meet with more disappointments than successes. My Merino ram " Premium " — mentioned particularly in "Sheep Husbandry in the South," and in some other publications, for his extraordinary individual qualitiesf — perhaps the finest wooled sheep then on record for one of equal weight of fleece, and ranking in the former particular with the choicest Saxons — did not get progeny peculiar for fineness. His own ancestors had been fine for the breed, but not remarkable in that particular. One of the showiest Merino rams now in New England does not inherit his showy traits, and he utterly fails to transmit them to his progeny. Exceptional good qualities are not, according to my observation, as likely to become hereditary, as indifferent or bad ones. Accidental characteristics are less likely to be perpetuated where they are opposed to the special characteristics of the breed. For example, the Merino wool has had a peculiar curled or spiral form of the fibei', for ages — a fixed, marked trait, never wanting, and as much a characteristic of the wool as its fineness. Mons. Graux's first straight-wooled " Mauchamp Merino" ram, if an accidental instead of a mongrel animal, brought only his own individual power to transmit that peculiarity to his progeny (out of full blood Merino ewes) * It will be seen that I have not introduced the case of these sheep with any view of illustrating: the transmission of actual "accidental" qualities — but to caution my readers against what I have not a shadow of doubt is either an amusing case of credulity or a gross attempt at imposition. t Sheep Husbandry in the South, p. 135. American Quarterly Journal of Agricul- ture, 1845 ; ib, 1846, p. 290. Report ou Fine-Wool Husbandry, 180:2, pp. 65, 97. 5* 10G PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF BREEDING. against a hereditary power which had been acquiring force for ages.* His success therefore was the more marvelous. But in merely giving a smaller head, etc., to his progeny, he did not necessai-ily run counter to any special and fixed peculiarity of breed.f The heads of Merino steep vary in size. Some of them are small. A malformation consisting of small ears, or of the want of any ears, or of one or more imperfect legs, or of having six legs, or any other deformity, does not imjnnge the special characteristics of a breed, or of one breed more than another. In all breeds alike, whether pure or impure, there is a tendency in nature to preserve and restore the normal form in the progeny ; but occasionally, as in the case of Mr. Ely's sheep, that tendency is not strong enough to resist the tendency of like to produce like. In all instances, pains should be taken to avoid breeding between males and females possessing the same defect, and particularly the same hereditary defect. In the first case, the individual force of hereditary transmission in both parents unites to reproduce the defect: in the second, both the individual and family hereditary force unite to reproduce it, and to escape from their combined effects would, of itself, be one of the strongest cases of " accidental " breeding. When the same individual or family defects are thus transmitted by both parents to their offspring, the latter are apt to inherit them to a greater degree or extent than they are possessed by either parent. Such an increase or aggrava- tion may be regarded as inevitable where the common defect is of the nature of an organic disease. If two human parents are affected by scrofula, and especially by hereditary scrofula, in a slight degree, their progeny may be expected to exhibit it in a much more malignant and destructive form. And the same law, in transmitting diseases, or morbific conditions, pertains equally to brutes. Relationship between parents also exerts a strong influence in such cases, but this will be more appropriately considered in the next Chapter. The relative influence of the sire and dam in transmitting their own individual forms and other properties to the progeny, has been the theme of much observation and discussion. The prevalent opinion formerly was that each * But if he was a mongrel, he brought the hereditary influence of straight-wooled and probably pure blood ancestors to bear again* tlmt of his Merino ancestors, and by breeding in-and-in, and by selection, he was made to give the preponderance to the former in the particular under consideration. MauchMtT6 "° -deflnite or reliable information in regard to the/onw of head in the PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF BREEDING. 107 parent transmitted a portion of all the properties, or a trait here and a trait there, as chance or some special and independent power in each animal to " mark " its offspring, might dictate. An English gentleman by the name of Orton, broached the theory that the animal organization is trans- mitted by halves, the sire giving to the progeny the external organs and locomotive powers, and the dam the internal organs and vital functions. By this division, the general form, the bones, the external muscles, the legs, skin and wool would be like those of the male parent, while the heart, lungs and other viscera, and consequently those functions on which the integrity of the constitution mainly rests, would he like those of the female parent. But each parent was supposed by him to exert a degree of influence on the parts and functions chiefly inherited from the other parent; and this law "of limitations" he considered "scarcely less important to be understood than the fundamental law itself." Mr. Walker, in his work on Intermarriage, presents the same theory, substantially, except that he denies that the series of organs inherited from one parent are modified or influenced by the other parent ; and he assumes that between parents of the same breed, "either the male or the female parent may give either series of organs."* Mr. Spooner, in an article on Cross-Breeding, which appear- ed in the Journal of the Royal Agricultural Society of England some years since the publication of his well known work on Sheep, adopts the Ortonian theory with some slight modi- fications. He says: — "The most probable supposition is that propagation is done by halves, each parent giving to the offspring the shape of one-half of the body. Thus the back, loins, hind quarters, general shape, skin and size follow one parent ; and the fore quarters, head, vital and nervous system, the other ; and we may go so far as to add, that the former, in the great majority of cases, go with the male parent and the latter with the female."f The Ortonian theory, or either of the above modifications of it, if actually carried into practice, would lead to singular results. According to Mr. Orton, the effects of cross-breeding would, comparatively speaking, stop with the first cross, for each succeeding generation of cross-bred males and females would continue to transmit to their descendants substantially * Vide pp. 142, 145. t Journal of Royal Agricultural Society of England, 1859. 108 PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF BREEDING. the same halves, in the same order, both with respect to form and general properties.* According to Mr. Walker the effects of crossing, among animals of different breeds, would generally absolutely stop and become unchangeable with the first cross, for every generation of descendants would receive the same half of the organization without any modification ! And on the other hand, between animals of the same breed, the descendants might either permanently exhibit the same relative paternal and maternal halves, or they might by in-and-in breeding, in the second generation, become exactly like their sire in both halves ! f The theory of propagation by halves appears to have considerable support from facts when it is applied to hybrids — animals derived from int«r-brecding distinct species, — as for instance the male ass with the mare, the horse with the female ass, the goat with the sheep, etc. But as applied to sheep, every observing breeder ought to know that it is essentially unfounded and chimerical. The Merino ram crossed with a ewe of some thin and coarse-wooled family, does not, either fully or approximately, transmit the weight, fineness or other * If this were so, half bloods, when bred together, would reproduce their own essential qualities about as uniformly as full bloods when bred together; and the attempt to form them into permanent families, occupying the same relative place they do between the original breeds of which they are composed, should result in as splendid success as it does, in point of fact, in complete and uniform failure. And by this theory, it would seem the half blood ram ought always to be used to perpetuate half bloods — yet experience shows that half blood rams are worthless for that object. I never have seen anything more than extracts from Mr. Orton's paper on this subject. I do not therefore know what exceptions he made for breeding back. He must of course have regarded it as only the exception, or else he could not have assumed any set of facts opposed to it to be the rule. Then, in his view, a majority at least of the descendants of half bloods, bred to half bloods, or to mongrels of their own degree, would continue uniformly to produce their own essential characteristics,— which every observing breeder knows they do not do. t Mr. Walker says : — " Let the example be that in which, of the animals subjected to in-and-in breeding, the father breeds with the daughter, and again with the grand- daughter. Now, it is certain the father gives half his organization to the daughter, (suppose the anterior series of organs.) and so far they are identical ; but, in breeding with the daughter, he may give the other half of his organization to the grand-daughter, (namely, the posterior series of organs.) and as the grand-daughter will then have both his series of organs — the former from the mother and the latter from himself — it is evident that there exists between the male and his grand-daughter a quasi identity. [ p. 210. ] Mr. Spooner does not develop his views very fully, but so far as he states them, he would appear to adopt Mr. Walker's theory of a strict propagation by halves, and at the same time to assume, by implication, that either parent may give either series of organs, in all cases, as Mr. Walker only assumes they may among animals of the same breed. If these are Mr. Spooner's real opinions, he must be prepared to believe that results like the following may ensue :— If a Merino ram was put to a Leicester ewe he would transmit half of his organization to their common progeny. If the same ram was put to his own half-blood daughter of that cross, he might give the other half of his organization to the progeny, so that it would be, de facto, a pure Merino. This would be a very summary process of creating pure Merinos out of Leicesters ! If the same rule held good in regard to horses, an Arabian stallion might in two generations produce pure Arabian stock from cart mares ! Is Mr. Spooner prepared to adopt such PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF BREEDING. 109 qualities of his fleece to his progeny. He, it is true, transmits a fleece which is much heavier and finer than that of the ewe ; and if again crossed with the half-blood, he transmits addi- tional weight and fineness. Each ascending grade toward the Merino will continue more and more to resemble the Merino in these particulars. But the process is gradual, not immediate ; the properties are transmitted by degrees, not by halves. The Ortonian theory, as applied to the transmission of form, in sheep, has a little more apparent foundation. The ram does, much oftener than the ewe, transmit his general external structure to the progeny. But the hypothesis that lie does so as invariably as Mr. Orton contends, or as Mr. Walker contends in the case of crosses between different breeds, or even as generally as Mr. Spooner supposes,* will fall to the ground at once when examined in the light of actual facts. In any and every flock of lambs, whether pure blood or crossed, there will be found entirely too many to be classed as mere exceptions, which, without breeding back of their immediate parents, do take the general form of the dam, and not that of the sire. And it will also be found that the instances which, even by the most liberal resort to imagina- tion, can be adduced as proofs of the theory of a strict transmission by halves, and of such a division of those halves as the advocates of the theory have agreed on, do not comprise a majority of cases. In my judgment, they do not include a fourth of them; and could scarcely be shown conclusively to include any. As a general thing we see distinct resemblances to each parent, or modified resemblances to both parents, existing in different proportions in the form, the fleece and the skin. One lamb has a carcass mostly like that of its sire and a fleece mostly like that of its dam. f Another takes a middle place between its parents in one or both particulars. Another actually, to some degree, divides the form, taking, for example, the shoulders of the dam with the hind quarters of the sire, or vice versa. I have a specific case in view of a ram (" 21 per cent.,") which has a shoulder obviously defective in being too thin. He transmits most of his form, his fleece, etc., to his progeny, with marked force. But not one in thirty of them exhibits a thin shoulder. By * I mean making all due allowance for breeding back, or for an exceptional want of relative vigor in the male, &c., &c. 1 1 think it is not common to see these two characteristics quite so broadly divided ; and probably never, when the pure blood ram is coupled with the cross-bred ewe. But with both those pure and cross-breeds which most resemble their sires in form, it is common to see the fleece at least equally partaking of the characteristics of the dam. 110 PRINCIPLES AND PBACTICK OF BREEDING. the half-and-half theory, all this would be impossible. According to that theory, all these characteristics belong to the same half of the organization, which is always transmitted as an entirety by one parent or the other. But it is easier to defend the half-and-half theory, so far as it pertains to the viscera and internal organization, because it is very difficult to follow it there ! I do not see how a really reliable decision can be arrived at except by a practical ocular examination of the parts, and it is not easy to understand how even the dissecting knife would let in much light on the subject. In healthy animals, it is not probable that any particular and persistent differences could be discovered in the viscera, except in the mere particular of size, and in this, the theory would not be likely to derive any support from a comparison of facts.* If it be contended that internal structure is to be judged or inferred by certain effects — such as constitution, strength, appetite, etc., I undertake to say, from abundant experience, that the progeny as often and as fully inherit these qualities from the sire as from the dam, even when they most distinctly inherit the general form of the sire. I have pursued this subject at greater length, because I have observed' that too many men who have the word "practical" ever on their lips (who seem to consider themselves practical on all agricultural subjects, because they work practically with their own hands on a farm!) are always ready to adopt the most baseless theories : and I consider the Ortonian theory as mischievous as it is baseless. I have said that the ram much the oftenest gives the leading characteristics of the form ; and I will now add, that he much the oftenest gives the size, and several of the leading properties of the fleece, particularly its length, density, and yolkiness. Its fineness and general style are probably usually, other things being equal, as much con- trolled by the dam as by the sire. But I do not believe the superior power of the ram to transmit his own qualities is purely an incident of sex. I believe co-operating causes are equally potential, and that the chief of these are superiority of blood, and superiority of individual vigor. * I suppose that if a large ram were put to a small ewe, and as usual gave his size (comparatively )>to the progeny, the size of the viscera would necessarily follow the size of the sires because the viscera always correspond with the size of the external struc tures and of the cavity to be filled. If, on the other hand, the ewe gave the size of carcass she would also give the size of the viscera. This is exactly at variance with the Ortonian theory, if the size of the intestines is one of those properties said to be given by that parent which does not give the size and form. PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF BREEDING. Ill The ram is generally " higher bred " than the ewes, even in full blood flocks. As pure blood is only separate family blood which has been kept distinct until it transmits but one set of family chai'acteristics, so higher blood is produced by the selection of pure blood animals of choicer qualities and breeding them together separate and distinct from all others, until they form a smaller improved sub-family, alike possessing a permanent hereditary character. The thin-chined, low fore-ended, roach - backed, black - faced sheep which formerly depastured the downs of Sussex, were of as pure blood as the superb South Downs which Mr. Ellman created out of them — but they were not so highly or well bred. The improved South Down ram of to-day does not transmit the same properties to his progeny which the unimproved animal of eighty years ago did. He not only transmits better ones, but he transmits them with more force and uniformity. This last is occasioned by two circumstances. The restriction of the sub -family for a number of generations to one fixed standard, gives greater force of hereditary- transmission to the fewer properties — that is, fewer in kind — which that standard admits of, because by that law on which "blood" or "species" rests, the oftener the same quality is reproduced, the stronger becomes its tendency to continued reproduction. The improved South Down breeds, so to speak, to one uniform pattern. The unimproved one breeds to a dozen different varieties of a family pattern. The second circumstance which gives a stronger power of strict hereditary transmission to the high-bred animal, consists (after the improved family becomes thoroughly established) in the re- striction placed on the limits of breeding back. The unimproved South Down could breed back to fifty different ancestors, all differing quite widely ; the improved one, unless he casually goes far back of the ordinary limits of breeding back, can only breed back to ancestors of very close resemblance. If the pure blood ram is put to grade ewes of different and no determinate blood, his strong power of hereditary transmission is encountered by no corresponding power on the other side, and the resemblance of the progeny to himself is unexpectedly striking, considering that they are but half of the same breed. If put to full blood ewes of his own breed, but lower bred than himself, the resemblance to himself is much less marked, though it is still very perceptible. If put to ewes of the same breed and as high bred as himself, the resemblance to himself is still fainter 112 PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF BREEDING. and considerably less uniform. In these last, he has encountered a force of hereditary transmission equal to his own, except in so far as he is aided by supei'ior power of sex. Persons who buy rams, generally buy from flocks better bred than their own, and hence is witnessed that assimilation of the progeny to the sire, and consequently that improve- ment, which is by some referred exclusively to sex, and by others to some inherent property to " mark " his offspring supposed to be peculiar to the sire. This hypothesis is not overthrown by the notorious fact that rams from the same flock exhibit the power of hereditary transmission in essentially different degrees, any more than is the hypothesis of the superior influence of the male sex overthrown by the same fact. Every flock has separate and bettor strains of blood within itself — even where all are descended from the same stock. Not only better males occasionally present themselves, but also better females. If the latter are found to transmit their own properties in a special degree to their offspring, they are highly prized and carefully reserved fr,om all sales. Each female descendant is prized and reserved in the same way, and a sub-family is thus created. Avouch of in-and-in breeding (by using a ram from the same sub-family on his relatives, as well as on the rest of the flock,) frequently aids to confer an identity on this little group of sheep which preserves itself for generations — as long as the flock is kept together. I am not acquainted with a celebrated breeding flock which has not within it several such recognized groups or sub -families of different value, but all better than the body of the flock. This explains how rams of the same blood and flock, and perhaps general appearance, may differ materi- ally in their qualities as sires, without imagining the existence of an independent faculty based on no physical properties. There is still another circumstance which affects the power of hereditary transmission, viz., vigor, — general physical vigor, and also special sexual vigor. A very strong, powerfully developed ram, full of power and vital energy — and full of untiring sexual ardor — Avill get stronger and better lambs and impress his own qualities on them more strongly than an ill, or feeble, or flaccid ram, with naturally weak or exhausted sexual powers. The ram should be essentially masculine in every organ and function.* He * Large testicles, and large, firm Spermatic cords connecting these with the body, m. The capacit n this particular. , , are regarded as indications of sexual vigor in the ram. The capacity to " bear heavy feed" has also much to do with a ram's endurance i PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF BREEDING. 113 should not even have what is termed a " ewe's fleece," but a longer, thicker and coarser one.* The Merino ram produces strong, healthy lambs from the age of seven or eight months to that of eight or ten years, and sometimes later, if he has never been over-worked. He does not attain his full maturity of vigor until he is three, and he usually begins to decline at seven or eight. A ram lamb ought not, for his own good, to be used to over ten or fifteen ewes — merely enough to test his qualities as a sire ; and to fit him properly for even this amount of work, he should be large, strong, and fleshy. A yearling can, without injury, do one-third and a two-year-old two-thirds the work of a mature ram. Strong, mature rams will, on the average, properly serve about two hundred ewes a year. I speak in all the above cases of but a single service to each ewe, and of a coupling season extending from forty to forty-five days. Rams have often exceeded these numbers. An Intantado ram lamb owned by Loyal C. Wright, of Corn- wall, Vermont, got one hundred and three lambs in the fall of 1862. The "Wooster Ram," so celebrated through- out Vermont, served three hundred ewes when a year old.f Some strong rams, in their prime, have served four hundred. The "Old Robinson Ram" is believed to have got nearly three thousand lambs during his life of thirteen or fourteen years. The Merino ewe breeds from her second to her tenth or twelfth year, and sometimes considerably longer, if carefully nursed after she begins to decline. J It is better for her, however, not to breed until her third year. Some, however, who have valuable ewes, * A ram of the same blood and breeding does not require to be as fine as a ewe, to get female progeny equal to her in fineness ; and an over-fine ram generally gets too light-fleeced progeny. His own fineness, unless an exceptional quality, shows that he has been bred too far in the direction of fineness, and, consequently, away from the proper standard of weight, for the maximum of these two qualities in the same fleece is not even approximately attainable. If the over-fine ram has himself a fleece of good weight, it is to be apprehended— in the absence of a full knowledge of antecedents — that the latter quality is exceptional, and that he may breed too much in the opposite direction. t So I am informed by Mr. Abel J. Wooster, of West Cornwall, Vermont. He purchased the ram of Mr. Hammond when a lamb— and hence the name of " Wooster Ram," or rather, according to a prevailing Americanism, "Wooster Buck." Some Merino breeders who find this name in the pedigrees of their sheepmay be interested to learn the following particulars communicated to me by Mr. Wooster. The ram never exceeded about 100 Ibs. weight with his fleece off. His first fleece weighed 12M Ibs., his second 19,l£ Ibs., and " after that he began to run down," and died before the completion of his fourth year. "He would bear heavy feed, and that and hard ser- vice shortened his life." t I stated in my Report on Fine- Wool Husbanry, 1862, that I had been informed that the dam of the " Old Robinson Ram " produced a lamb in her twenty-second year. I have since ascertained that I was misinformed on the subject. 114 PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF BREEDING. put them to breeding at two, but take off their lambs and give them to foster-mothers. If the young ewe is carefully dried off her milk, she will experience no injury and no loss of growth. The increase of growth during pregnancy will make up for the slight falling off after yeaning. The English breeds both mature and decline considerably earlier in life. A theory of considerable importance to the breeder, if true, has recently been started, viz., that the male which first impregnates a female, continues to exert an influence on some of the qualities of her subsequent offspring, or at least is liable to do so. I have not, in my own expeiience, observed any proofs of this.* It has been a prevailing opinion among American breeders that it is much better to breed between a small male and large female, than in the contrary direction. The reason assigned by Mr. Cline, of England, who first, I think, publicly advanced this view, was that the fetus begotten by the larger male has not room to expand and develop itself properly in the womb of the small female ; that it does not obtain sufficient nutrition from stores intended for a smaller fetus; and that, in consequence of these things, it can not obtain its normal size and proportions anterior to birth : secondly, that it is liable on account of its extra size to cause difficulty, if not danger to its dam in yeaning ; and finally, that the opposite course, by giving the fetus unusual room and extra nutriment, tends to its most perfect development. This is probably true as between different breeds, where the disparity in size is extreme, as, for instance, between the Saxon Merino ewe and the Cots wold ram. I would not expect a greatly overgrown ram to get as good stock as a more moderate sized one, even on ewes of the same breed, but it would be quite as much for another reason as for any of the preceding ones, viz., that these overgrown animals never possess the highest attainable amount of vigor and general excellence themselves, and are not therefore fitted for sires, irrespective of relative size. But the rule should not be extended to the exclusion of large rams of the breed, if good in other particulars. Nature adapts herself unexpectedly to circumstances, in the face of all theories. Constant and recent experiments, in England, * Those who wish to see the facts and arguments which are set forth to support this theory will find them in Mr. S. L. Goodale's interesting work on the Principles of Breeding, published in 1861. PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF BREEDING. 115 in crossing ewes with the rams of much larger breeds (to obtain large lambs for the butcher) demonstrate, as has been already seen, that the prevailing fears on this subject have been somewhat exaggerated.* * The Down or New Leicester ram is coupled with almost any of the smaller sized local varieties for the purpose of getting larger and earlier maturing lambs for the market. The very small and hornless heads of the Down and New Leicester lambs, it is true, peculiarly fit them for easy and safe parturition ; but in other respects, they are exposed to all the disadvantages of disproportioned size before and after birth, and these are not found sufficient, in practice, to prevent the crosses from proving highly profitable for the objects in view. CHAPTER XII. BKEEDING IN-AND-IN, BREEDING in-and-in is ordinarily understood, in our country, to mean breeding between relatives, without reference to the degree of consanguinity ; and I shall therefore use it in that sense in this work, specifying, when there is occasion, whether the degree of consanguinity is close or remote. But this is not the sense in which it has been used by those eminent European writers who have done so much to plant an inveterate prejudice against its very name in the public mind. Sir John Sebright ranks among the highest of these, and he did not consider procreation between father and daughter, and mother and son, to be breeding in-and-in! Breeding between brother and sister he thought might " be called a little close," but " should they both be very good, and particularly should the same defects not predominate in both, but the perfections of the one promise to correct in the produce the imperfections of the other, he did not think it objectionable ! " And again, he says breeding in-and in " may be beneficial, if not carried too far, particularly in fixing any variety which may be thought valuable." It is to be regretted that Sir John does not define what he considers to be in-and-in breeding. I apprehend that he means by it breeding the father with the daughter and again with the grand-daughter, or the mother with the son and again with the grand-son. In all the distinguished British works I have ever perused on the subject, I have found the same lack of definitions. The authors evidently vary in the meaning they attach to the term, but I think I can confidently say that none of them make it include br$ding between all relatives, or object to breeding, when there is occasion for it, between relatives not of near consanguinity. It is a very prevalent impression in the United States, particularly among those who have no personal experience on the subject, that the inter-breeding of the most remote BREEDING IN-AND-IN. 117 relatives is fatal — fatal not only to the physical organization, but to the mind among human beings, and even to the instinct among brutes. It was stated in the preceding Chapter that when hereditary disease or a predisposition toward it, exists in either parent, there is always danger that it will be trans- mitted to offspring, and that if the disease or predisposition exists in both parents, that danger is greatly increased. If the parents be nearly related to each other, the danger of transmission is virtually converted into certainty, with an aggravation of the conditions and increased incurableness in the malady. Consequently when mankind degenerated from their original physical perfection — when disease entered the world and predispositions to it became engrafted in the human system — the Divine Lawgiver made cohabitation within certain degrees of affinity a crime by prohibition. But if it was evil in itself (rnalum in se) why was it not prohibited to the immediate descendants of our first parents, and why were not unrelated human beings created to avoid its necessity ? The peopling of the world in the second generation at least, was necessarily carried on between brothers and sisters, the closest possible relations. Can it be supposed that, under the direct ordination of Omnipotence, the human race originated in a crime against nature — in an extreme violation of the fundamental laws which regulate physical and mental well being? The brute, it is fair to assume, was started in its course of procreation equally unrestricted, for it would understand no prohibition; and it was created with habits which must constantly and necessarily lead to cohabitation and breeding between the nearest relatives. Some varieties of birds, like the dove, are hatched in pairs, one of each sex, and with habits which would render the separation of those pairs, for procreation, the exception instead of the rule. Some varieties of quadrupeds, like the lion, are born and brought up in isolated families ; and having no aversion to breeding between relatives, it would be most natural that those who thus live together should at maturity pair together. In herds of elephants, wild horses, buffaloes, etc., particular males dominate over the same herd for years, and make it their harem until they become enfeebled and are conquered by some more youthful and more vigorous rival — probably a son — who in turn dominates, decays and gives place to a successor. In this course of things, the father must be 118 BREEDING IN -AND -IK. constantly breeding with his own daughters, and, if he lives long enough, with his grand - daughters ; and his male successors must commence breeding with sisters and continue it with their descendants. All these animals are, de facto, paired together by that Being who created their instincts and gave them their habits. Is there any visible proof that their races have become physically degenerate on this account? Are not the lion and the elephant as large, healthy and powerful as they were ages ago? No one pretends to the contrary. But we are told — and this was Sebright's argument — that a natural provision was also made to prevent animals from degenerating from the effects of in-and-in breeding. " A severe winter, or a scarcity of food, by destroying the weak and the unhealthy, has all the good effects of the most skillful selection." And he might have added, that the strong male kills the weak male, the herd trample down the sick and the feeble, and gore to death the wounded. Such causes, undoubtedly, combine to extirpate what may be termed accidental degeneracy. But these facts do not go far enough to sustain the position of those who believe that in-and-in breeding necessarily results in degen- eracy. If it did, instead of a few, the whole or nearly the whole flock or herd or family, in such cases as I have mentioned, would perish ; and whole races would long since have become extinct. The moment we step from the domain of nature to the domain of man, the scene changes. We have treated our domesticated animals as we have treated ourselves. By artificial surroundings — by changing the natural habits in regard to nutrition, exercise, etc. — by cruelty or kindness — by breeding the diseased with the healthy — we have brought malformation, infirmity, disease and premature death among all of them; and we have continued the causes until we have made the effects a part of the physical systems, and thoroughly hereditary among them. Therefore no longer, like the free normal denizens of the forest and the air, can they follow their natural instincts with impunity ; and the inter-breeding of the infirm and diseased, and especially of infirm and diseased relatives, must, as in the case of man, be prevented. But all the facts I have ever seen or ascertained from entirely reliable sources, go to show that the inter-breeding of relatives, and even near ones, is innocuous when both parents are free from all defects and infirmities which tend to impair the normal physical organization. It is difficult to improve BREEDING IN-AND-IN. 119 animals, give them a marked family uniformity, and give their peculiar excellencies a permanent hereditary character, without in-and-in breeding. Consequently a great majority of the ablest breeders of domestic animals of every description in England — such as Bake well among long-wooled sheep; Ellman among short-wooled sheep ; the Collings, Mason, Maynard, Wetherell, Knightly, Bates and the Booths among Short-Horn cattle;* Price among the Herefords,f and a multitude of others of nearly equal celebrity — have been close in-and-in breeders. The Stud Book abounds in examples of celebrated horses produced by this course of breeding. The same is true of nearly all the improved English varieties of smaller animals, such as pigs, rabbits, fowls, pigeons, etc. But we need not go abroad for examples. The Paular sheep of the Rich family were first crossed in 1842. They were then pre-eminently hardy. No one claims that they have gained either in hardiness or size by the cross. Yet for thirty years preceding that period, they had been bred strictly in-and-in, to say nothing of their previous in-and-in breeding in Spain. Whether and how far the Spaniards aimed to avoid breeding from very close individual relationships I am not informed. I have never learned that they paid any attention to them one way or the other ; and their general course of breeding was certainly in-and-in. Each Cabana, or permanent flock, was kept entirely free from admixture with * I quote the following from a note in my Report on Fine-Wool Husbandry, 1862 : "In the first volume of American Short-Horn Herd Book (edited by Lewis F. Allen, Esq.,) are diagrams showing the continuous and close in-and-in breeding which pro- duced the bull Comet, by far the most superb and celebrated animal of his day, and which sold, at Charles Ceiling's sale for the then unprecedented price of $5,000. His pedigree cannot be stated so as to make the extent of the in-and-in breeding, of which he was the result, fully apparent, except to persons familiar with such things, and such persons probably need no information on the subject. But this much all will see the force of: the bull Bolingbroke and the cow Phenix, which were more closely related to each other than half-brother and sister, were coupled and produced the bull Favorite. Favorite was then coupled with his own dam and produced the cow Young Phenix. He was then coupled with his own daughter (Young Phenix) and their pro- duce W4is the world-famed Comet. One of the best breeding cows in Sir C. Knightly'a herd (Restless) was the result of still more continuous in-and-in breeding. I will state a part of the pedigree. The bull Favorite was put to his own daughter, and then to his own grand-daughter, and so on to the produce of his produce in regular succession for six generations. The cow which was the result of the sixth inter-breeding, was then put to the bull Wellington, " deeply inter-bred on the side of both sire and dam in the Mood of favorite, and the produce was the cow Clarissa, an admirable animal and the mother of Restless. Mr. Bates, whose Short-Horns were never excelled (if equaled) in England, put sire to daughter and grand-daughter, son to dam and grand- dam, and brother to sister, indifferently, his rule being 'always to put the best animals together, regardless of any affinity of blood,' as A. B. Allen informs me he distinctly declared to him, and indeed as his recorded practice in the Herd Book fully proves." t Mr. Price, whose Herefords were the best in England in his day, declared, in an article published in the British Farmer's Magazine, that he had not gone beyond his own herd for a bull or a cow for forty years. 120 BBEEDING IN-AND-IN. others, and its stock rams were selected from its own number. Consequently fathers and daughters, and brothers and sisters must have constantly bred with each other. Mr. Chamber- lain's Silesians have not received any cross, or any fresh blood from either of the original families, within half a century ; yet they are 50 per cent, larger than the sheep they originated from and are entirely healthy. Mr. Hammond's Infantados present a still stronger case. They were bred in-and-in by Col. Humphreys up to the period of Mr. Atwood's purchase ; Mr. Atwood bred his entire flock from one ewe^ and never used any but pure Humphreys rams; Mr. Ham- mond has preserved the same blood entirely intact — and thus, after being drawn beyond all doubt from an unmixed Spanish Cabana, they have been bred in-and-in, in the United States, for upwards of sixty years. Fortunately Mr. Hammond has preserved some of his leading individual pedigrees, and I will give one of these as a most forcible illustration of the subject under examination. For that purpose I will select the pedigree of Gold -Drop, one of his present stock rams. It includes that of Sweepstakes — the ram figured in the frontispiece — and has the advantage of exhibiting the course of breeding for two generations later. The pedigree is given on next page. PEDIGREE OP GOLD -DROP AND SWEEPSTAKES. 121 122 BBEEDING IN -AND- IN". It will be seen that Gold -Drop, after the recurrence of seven generations, traces every drop of his Wood to two rams and three ewes, purchased of Mr. Atwood ! A careful study of this pedigree will disclose a closeness of in-and-in breeding which will surprise most persons, and will surprise a portion of them the more in view of the fact that Mr. Hammond's whole flock has been bred with the same disre- gard of consanguinity, and yet all the time since his purchase of its foundation, has been increasing, not only in amount of wool, but in size, bone, spread of rib, compactness, easiness of keep ; in short, in all those things which indicate improved constitution. Nor has there been the least tendency toward that barrenness which has been thought by some to be one of the results of in-and-in breeding.* Every one who draws rams from his own flock and breeds from the best, will inevitably find himself a close in-and-in breeder. The best beget, the best. If a ram of surpassing excellence as a sire arises and makes a decided improvement in the flock, he is of course coupled with the best ewes, and all the choicest young animals in the flock are soon of his get — and consequently, leaving out of view all previous consanguinity, are as nearly related as half brothers and sisters. These must be bred with each other, or the best of one sex sold, or the highest grade of perfection, on one side, prevented from being joined with the highest grade of perfection on the other. The latter alternatives are most discouraging hindrances in the progress of breeding improve- ment ; and how can we assume that they are necessary, in the face of such facts as those above given ? I could add hundreds of examples, both in Europe and the United States, to prove that in-and-in breeding does not, per se, produce degeneracy. But while I am satisfied that even close in-and-in breeding is one of the most powerful levers of improvement in the hands of such men as Bakewell, Ellman, and Hammond — breeders who thoroughly understand the physiology of their art — I shall not claim that it is so, or even that it is safe, in the hands of those who do not fully and clearly know what is perfect and imperfect in structure ; who cannot detect every visible indication of hereditary disease ; and who are not familiar by long experience with the effects of combining different forms, qualities and conditions by inter-breeding. * See APPENDIX A. BBEEDING IN-AND-IN. 123 "With such notable instances of successful in-and-in breeders as I have given, and with the hundreds that might be added to the list, it is equally true that the instances of those who have failed have been vastly more numerous. When the masterly hand of Bakewell no longer guided his improved Leicesters, but a very small number among all the prominent breeders of them were ftmnd able to preserve them without some admixture of fresh blood. When not ruined entirely, they became delicate and inclined to sterility. And so the pinnacle of success is often but one step from the final over- throw. In view of all the facts, therefore, the great majority of sheep farmers, who do not make breeding a study and an art, had better continue to avoid anything like close in-and-in breeding — though there is no occasion for those exaggerated fears which many entertain on the subject, in respect to remote relatives, where the animals to be coupled are obviously robust and well formed. Some persons believe that the dangers of in-and-in breed- ing are less between animals of pure blood than between mongrels or grade animals.* I can see no reason for this, if the latter are equally perfect in that structural organization on which health depends. * See Goodale on the Principles of Breeding. CHAPTER OBOSS-BBEEDING. CEOSS - BREEDING THE MEEINO AND COARSE BREEDS CROSSING DIFFERENT FAMILIES OF MERINOS CROSSING BETWEEN ENGLISH BREEDS AND FAMILIES RECAPITULA- TION. CROSS-BREEDING, as I shall use the term, signifies breeding between animals of different breeds, varieties, or families; but it is not applicable to breeding between animals of the same family, though they belong to different and unrelated flocks. CEOSS- BREEDING BETWEEN THE MERINO AND COARSE BREEDS. — The range of cross-breeding between fine and coarse-wooled sheep is comparatively limited, because there is but one breed of the former of any recognized importance, viz., the Merino. And no intelligent man, at the present day, would any more think of 'crossing the Merino with another breed to improve the characteristics sought in the Merino, than he would of alloying gold with copper to improve the qualities of the gold. When the object of such crossing has been to improve coarse inferior races, it has succeeded for certain purposes. The coarse common sheep of our country, for example, are always rendered more valuable by an infusion of Merino blood. They gain materially in fleece, and lose in no other particular. But all crosses between the Merino and the large, early-maturing improved English breeds and families, such as the Leicesters, Cotswolds, and the different families of Downs, have uniformly resulted in failure, and must always do so, as long as the characteristics of the respective breeds remain the same. The largest and heaviest fleeced Merinos would probably increase the weight of fleece of even the heaviest fleeced English long-wools, but the wool loses by CBOSS - BREEDING. 1 25 the cross its present specific adaptation to a demand always §reat in England and now rapidly increasing in the United tates. * TKe mutton is not injured, nay, for American tastes, it is decidedly improved by the cross ; but the long- wool sheep loses its size, its early maturity, its propensity to fatten, and its great prolificacy in breeding. It loses the faultless form of the English sheep, without even acquiring the knotty compactness of the Merino. In short, in the expressive common phrase, it becomes "neither one thing nor the other," but only a comparatively valueless mongrel between two — for their own separate objects — unimprovable breeds !f The cross between the Merino and the Down materially increases and improves the fleece of the latter. But it is held to detract from the value of the mutton, and it seriously impairs the value of the Down in all the same particulars in which it impairs the value of long-wools. All attempts to establish permanent intermediate varieties of value by crosses between the Merino and any family of mutton sheep, with a view of combining the especial excel- lencies of each, have ended in utter failure. Those with the Down and the Ryeland seemed to promise best, J yet they not only resulted in disappointment, but produced mongrels incapable of being bred back to either of the English types. The Merino, owing, doubtless to its greater purity of blood compared with most other breeds, and to its vastly greater antiquity of blood compared with any of them, § possesses a force and tenacity of hereditary transmission which renders it a most unmanageable material in any cross aiming at middle results. Its distinctive peculiarities are * The combination of a wool so pre-eminent for certain necessary objects with snch valuable mutton properties, render these sheep one of those great gifts to man- kind which it would seem almost wicked to tamper with ! 1 1 made some experiments in this cross — quite enough to satisfy me — in the earlier part of my life. $ I bred a few hundred South Down and Merino cross-breeds, many years ago, and they made a very pretty sheep. They were not much larger than the largest sized Infantados of the present day — because, filled with Mr. Cline's ideas, I selected a very small and excessively high-bred ram for the cross. He was bred by Francis Rotch, Esq., and got by a prize ram of Mr. Ellman's out of an Ellman ewe. § The fine-wooled sheep of Spain are clearly traceable to a period anterior to the Christian Era, on the authority of Strabo, Pliny and other Roman writers of conceded veracity. Pliny was himself the Roman Procurator in Spain in the opening part of the first century, and could speak from the result of his own observations. The often re-published statement — that the breed was formed and subsequently perfected by crossing these fine-wooled sheep with coarse, hairy, long-wooled Barbary rams, intro- duced for that purpose by Columella, Pedro IV, of Castile, and Cardinal Ximenes— rests on no sound historical proof, and is not credited by any recent intelligent writer on sheep. It never was credited by men who were practically acquainted with the breed- ing of Merino sheep. If these Barbary crosses are not altogether mythical, they undoubtedly were made with, or first formed, the C'hunahs, a lonjt, coarse-wool**! breed of sheep which have existed for ages in Spain 126 CEOSS- BREEDING. made to give way with difficulty, and its tendency to breed back is almost unconquerable. But if the Merino fuses with reluctance, it absorbs other breeds with rapidity. A cross between it and a coarse breed is always legitimate and successful, where the object is to merge that coarse breed entirely in the Merino. This is accomplished by putting the ewes of such breed, and every new generation of their cross- bred descendants, steadily to pure blood Merino rams. Many grade flocks were commenced in this way, a few years since, in the Southern States, and particularly in Texas, — not a few of thefc under my advice, and to some extent under my direction. The pasture lands in those regions were limitless and their market value only nominal. They were generally yielding no returns to their owners. If they could be stocked speedL'y with any kind of sheep, the gain would be immense. But wool would be the main object, as there was little or no market for mutton. To stock such large tracts with pure blood Merinos was out of the question, both on the score of expense, and because they could not be obtained rapidly enough at any cost. I therefore counseled the purchase of the common ewes of the country where there were any, and where there were none, those most readily to be obtained, — even though, as it often happened in Western Texas, none could be obtained better than the small, coarse, thin - wooled, miserable Mexican ewes. These and their progeny being bred steadily to Merino rams, the result was in every instance a decided success. The first generation of cross-breeds, even from Mexican sheep, were signally improved in weight and quality of wool, and when from a mediocre Merino ram, would sell for more than twice the price of their dams ; and each ascending grade toward the Merino continued to increase steadily in value.* * George W. Kendall, Esq., by far the largest and most experienced wool grower in Texas, who started a portion of his flock with Mexican ewes, in a letter published in the Texas Almanac, 1858, says : " The produce of the old Mexican ewes gave evident signs of great improvement, not only in form and apparent vigor of constitution, but particularly in the quantity and quality of the wool. Here I might state that a Mexican ewe, shearing one pound of coarse wool, if bred to a Merino buck of pure and approved good blood, will produce a lamb, which, when one year old, will shear at least three pounds of much finer wool; and the produce of this lamb, again, if a ewe, will go up to four and a half or five pounds of still finer wool. I can now show wethers in my flock of the third remove from the original coarse Mexican stock which la-t May sheared seven pounds of wool- unwashed, it is true, but of exceeding fine quality, and worth 30 cents per pound at this time in New 1 ork, or $2.10 for the fleece. This is a rapid improvement. Had the old ewe and her produce been bred constantly to Mexican bucks, the wether would have sheared ?™ ^ cent, worth of coarse wool— not more than 40 cents worth at the outside." (Ihese facts further show the nonsense of the half-and-half theory of propa^a- CROSSING FAMILIES OF MERINOS. 127 In such crosses the high qualities of choice rams render themselves eminently conspicuous — even more so, relatively, than in breeding among full-bloods. The descendants of such rams in the second cross (% blood) are frequently more valuable than those of mediocre rams in the fourth or fifth cross (j-f or f£ blood.) In the matter of profit — for the mere purposes of wool growing for our American market — these grades approach the full-blood rapidly. But there never was a more prepos- terous delusion than that entertained by the early French breeders, that " a Merino in the fourth generation [|| blood] from even the worst wooled ewes, was in every respect equal to the stock of the sire." Chancellor Livingston, who asserts this to have been the opinion of the French breeders, further says: — "No difference is now [1809] made in Europe in the choice of a ram, whether he is a full-blood or fifteen- sixteenths."* This undoubtedly solves problems in relation to a portion of the French Merinos, which otherwise would be quite inexplicable. They are, undoubtedly, grade sheep. The Germans, on the other hand, refuse to the highest bred grade sheep any other designation than " improved half- bloods." They found, says Mr. Fleichniann, that their original coarse sheep had 5,500 fibers of wool on a square inch of skin ; that grades of the third or fourth Merino cross have about 8,000 ; the twentieth cross 27,000 ; the perfect pure blood from 40,000 to 48,000.f I do not apprehend that there is any thing like an equal difference between the number of fibers on a given surface of the American Merino and its grades ; but in thirty years observation of such grades of every rank — some of them higher than the tenth cross, where there is but one part of the blood of the coarse sheep to 1,023 parts of Merino blood J — I never have yet seen one which, in every particular, equaled a full blood of the highest class. CROSSING DIFFERENT FAMILIES OF MERINOS. — This has resulted more or less favorably under different circumstances. The Spaniards did not practice it. The French were the first who undertook it on a comprehensive scale. They selected, as we have seen, from all the Spanish families indiscriminately * Livingston's Essay on Sheep, p. 131. t See Mr. Fleichmann's article on German sheep in the Patent Office Report, 1847. $ Probably most persons are familiar with reckoning the degrees of blood in ascending crosses — but for those who are not, I will say that the first cross has 1-2 improved blood ; 2d, 3-4 ; 3d, 7-8 ; 4th, 15-16 ; 5th, 31-32 ; 6th, 03-64 ; 7th, 127-128 ; 8th, 255-256J; 9th, 511-512 ; 10th, 1023-1024, and so on. 128 CROSSING FAMILIES OF MERINOS. where they could find animals which presented desirable qualities, and mixed these families indiscriminately together. To this cause, in a very considerable measure, is to be attributed the remarkably unhomogeneous character of the French flocks. Breeding back, in the hands of persons entertaining different views, has separated them into almost as many families as they started from ; and the new families lack within themselves the uniformity and permanent hered- itary character of the original ones. Mr. Jarvis, in the United States, crossed several families — all prime Leonese, and not widely variant in character. The cross was guided by a single intelligent will, and always toward a definite and consistent end. Therefore a much greater degree of uniformity was obtained. The present highly popular Paular family in Vermont is, as has been already seen, dashed with Infantado and mixed Leonese (Jarvis) strains of blood.* Crosses between the present Paulars and Infantados are now common throughout Vermont, and the produce is held in high estimation. The Paular ewe in such cases is usually bred to the Infantado ram. It should be borne in mind that the widest of these crosses do not go beyond six original cabanas of prime Leonese sheep, — among the best and most uniform of Spain. The cross began in Germany by Ferdinand Fischer, * I gave an account of the origin of this cross in my Report on Fine- Wool Husbandry, 1862, from the information of those who ought to have known the facts; bnt on fuller investigation it proves to have been erroneous in some particulars. The Rich (Paular) and Jarvis (mixed Leonese) sheep had been crossed somewhat anterior to 1844. Judge M. W. C. Wright, of Shoreham, Vermont, having conceived the idea of crossing the produce with the Infantado or Atwood family, purchased a ram for that purpose of Mr. Atwood at the New York State Fair in the fall of the last named year. Judge Wright sold the ram, immediately after his return to Vermont, to Prosper Elithorp, of Bridport, and Loyal C. Remelee, of Shoreham, but used him himself more or less for three years. This, the "Atwood ram," got the " Elithorp ram" out of a ewe bred by Mr. Remelee, and sold by him to Mr. Elithorp. The dam of the Elithorp ram was got by Judge Wright's "Black Hawk" out of a pure Jarvis ewe, purchased by Mr. Remelee of Mr, Jarvis. Black Hawk was got by " Fortune," out of a pure Jarvis ewe purchased by Judge Wright of Mr. Jarvis. Fortune was bred by Tyler Stickney, and got by " Consul " out of a pure Paular (Rich) ewe. Consul was a pure Jarvis ram, purchased by Mr. Stickney of Mr. Jarvis. Mr. Elithorp sold the Elithorp ram, then a lamb, in the fall of 1845. to Erastus Robinson, of Shoreham. The Elithorp ram got the " Old Robinson ram " out of a ewe bred by Mr. Elithorp, and sold by him, with twenty-nine others, to Mr. Robinson in 1843. The dam of the Old Robinson ram was got by the Atwood ram, above mentioned, out of a pure Paular (Rich) ewe bred by Mr. Robinson, and sold by him to Mr. Elithorp in 1843. The Atwood, Elithorp and Old Robinson rams, and particularly the last named, were the founders of the crossed family. The Old Robinson ram in the hands of Mr. Robinson and his brother-in-law, Mr. Stickney, (who subsequently purchased him of the former,) begot an immense number of lambs, which were very strongly marked with his own characteristics, and which, in turn, generally transmitted "them with great force to their posterity. They were generally smallish, short, exceedingly round and compact, with fine, yolky, and for those times and for the size of the sheep. heavy fleeces. Messrs. Robinson and Stickney spread rams of this family far and Wide. See APPENDIX B. CROSSING AMERICAN AND FRENCH MERINOS. 129 between the Negretti and Infantado families, and continued in the United States by Mr. Chamberlain, and its results have already been described. The cross between the French and American Merino has been well spoken of in some quarters, but it has not yet, so far as my individual observation has extended, justified those expectations which, it would seem, might reasonably be based on the character of the materials. The best French ewe, or the French and American Merino ewe (with a sufficient infusion of French blood to have large size,) has few superiors as a pure Avool-producing animal. But the wool lacks yolk to give it weight. The full-blood French sheep also lacks in hardi- ness*. Both it and its cross-breeds are excellent nurses. The American Merino ram has a super-abundance of the desired yolkiness of fleece and of hardiness. As the smaller animal, his progeny have especial advantages for an excellent develop- ment before parturition, and they receive abundant nutrition afterwards. Here then, seemingly, are all the requisite conditions for an excellent cross ; and I cannot but believe that such a cross will be made with decided success, as soon as precisely the fitting individual materials are brought together and managed with the requisite skill.f The cross between the American and Saxon Merino results proverbially well — better in almost every instance than it would be considered reasonable to anticipate. I gave a * It lacks very materially in hardiness if from a pampered flock, or immediately descended from pampered ancestors. The early crosses between French and American Merino sheep require extra attention when young, but when fully grown are, on fair keep, a healthy and hardy animal. t I tried this cross a few years since, and the following statement of the results appeared in my Report on Fine Wool Husbandry, 1862: — "My own experiments in this cross, candor requires me to say, have been less successful. Some of them were made with a ram bred by Col. F. M. Rotch and pure-blood American Merino ewes; some were purchased of gentlemen who started with such ewe's and bred them to first- rate French ranis obtained of Messrs. Taintor and Patterson; and some were got by pure American rams on high grade French and American ewes (averaging say fifteen- sixteenths or more French, and the remainder American Merino blood.) From this last cross I expected much. The ewes were compact and noble looking animals. The produce was obviously better than the get of French rams on the same ewes, but after watching it for two years, I have recently come rather reluctantly to the conclusion that, in this climate, even these grades are not intrinsically as valuable as pure American Merinos. But the Merino ram which got them, though apparently present- ing the most admirable combination of points for such a cross, has not proved himself a superior sire with other ewes ; and I do not therefore regard this experiment as conclusive. (This ram weighed about 140 Ibs., was compact and symmetrical, and his fleece weighed 14 Ibs. washed. He was a very dark, yolky sheep. He was bred in Vermont; and though undoubtedly full blood, probably did not spring from ancestors as good as himself, or in other words, he was an " accidental " animal.) Some well- managed experiments of both these kinds have been tried by the Messrs. Baker, of Lafayette, and the Messrs. Clapp, of Pompey, N. Y. They bred toward the French until they obtained about fifteen-sixteenths of that blood, and now find the cross best the other way. One of the last of these crosses now appears to promise extremely well." 6* 130 CROSSING AMERICAN AND SAXON MERINOS. striking instance, in my Report on Fine- Wool Husbandry, 1862, of the good results of a Paular and Saxon cross. I will now give one of an Infantado and Saxon cross. Capt. Davis Cossit (TJ. S. V.) of Onondaga, New York, had in 1859 a flock of Saxon ewes with sufficient American Merino blood to yield, on ordinary keep, about four pounds of washed wool per head. In that and the two succeeding years he put his ewes to the Infantado ram "21 per cent.," (named in connection with Petri's table of the dimensions, etc., of Spanish sheep in Chapter 1st of this volume.) In 1862 the fleeces of the young sheep produced by this cross Avere first weighed separately. Eighty-three two-year old ewes yielded 552 Ibs., and eighty yearling ewes 504 Ibs. of washed wool — within a fraction of 6£ Ibs. per head, and an advance of about 2£ Ibs. per head over the fleeces of their dams. Each lot was the entire one (of ewes) of its year : not one having been excluded on account of inferiority. I saw them several times before shearing, and them and their wool immediately after shearing. The wool was in good condition ; and the sheep obviously had not been pampered. They were very uniform in size and shape, and bore a strong resemblance to their sire. Not one of the whole number had short or thin wool. In 1863, sixty-five two-year olds (the portion remaining on hand of the eighty yearlings of the preceding year) and ninety-two yearlings (the third crop of lambs got by "21 per cent.") yielded 1,1 19£ Ibs. of washed wool, ov an average of 7 Ibs. 2 oz. per head. All these sheep had been heavily tagged and the tags, which would not have averaged less than 2 oz. of washed wool per head, were not weighed with the Notwithstanding these brilliant and rather frequent successes in crossing different Merino families, (especially where the object is to merge an inferior in a superior family,) the failures, or comparative failures, have been far more numerous. To cross different families of any breed merely for the sake of crossing, under the impression that it is in itself beneficial to health, or in any other particular — or with * I do not give the weight of the three-year olds' fleeces in 1863, because they •were put in -with the fleeces of other breeding ewes, and not weighed separately. About fifteen of the yearling ewes were out of some young ewes of a previous cross, then just come into breeding, which yielded about 5 Ibs. of wool per head. The two- year olds were sheared on the 34th of May in 1862, and on the 8th and 9th of June in 1863, so that their fleeces were of 12>£ months' growth. The yearlings were dropped between the 6th of April and 1st of June. 1862, and sheared at the same time with tho preceding in 18<>3, so that their fleeces did not average over fourteen months' growth- the usual one at the first shearing. Neither lot was pampered. CROSSING WITHOUT AJST OBJECT. 131 a vague hope that some improvement of a character which cannot be anticipated may result from it, is the height of folly and weakness. Even uniform mediocrity is far preferable to mediocrity without uniformity; and he who has the former should not break it up by crossing, without having a definite purpose, a definite plan for attaining that purpose, and enough knowledge and experience on the subject to afford a decent prospect of success. It is always safer and better in seeking any improvement, to adhere strictly to the same breed and family, if that family contains within itself all the requisite elements of the desired improvement, or as good ones as can be found elsewhere. The most splendid successes, among all classes of domestic animals have been won in this way.* Successful crossing generally requires as much skill as success- ful in-and-in breeding. And as it is vastly more common, so vastly more flocks in this country have been impaired in value by it, or at least hindered from making any important and permanent improvement. They are not permitted to become established in any improvement, before it is upset by a new cross ; and these rapid crosses finally so destroy the family character of the flock — infuse into it so many family and individual strains of blood to be bred back to — that it sometimes becomes a mere medley which has lost the benefit that blood confers — viz., family likeness and the power to transmit family likeness to posterity. Every breeder or flockmaster should, after due observation and reflection, fix upon a standard for his flock — a standard * The English race-horse and the Short-Horned family of cattle are both frequently cited as instances of choice breeds originating from a mixed origin. In regard to the origin of the race-horse, the weight of proof and intelligent opinion is the other way. In regard to that of the Short-Horn, the matter is involved in much doubt. (Those who wish to see the facts on both sides of the question stated, will find them in Stevens' edition of Youatt and Martin on Cattle 1851.) But conceding, for the sake of the argument, that both breeds were originally the result of crosses, can any one show that they owed such merit as they first possessed to the cross ? And have either of them been improved up to their present matchless character, by the aid of any new crosses? Mr. Youatt says:— "In the descent of almost every modern racer, not the slightest flaw can be discovered ; or when, with the splendid exception of Sampson and Bay Malton, one drop of common blood has mingled with the pure stream, it has been immediately detected in the inferiority of form, and deficiency of bottom, and it has required two or three generations to wipe away the stain and get rid of its conse- quences." The Short-Horns have been bred pure, with an equally jealous exclusive- ness ; and no breeder of them would admit a cross in his pedigrees sooner than he would a bar-sinister on his family escutcheon, except in the single case of the dependents of a polled Galloway cow, to which Charles Colling resorted for a cross with sonic of his Short-Horns. He took but a single cross and bred back ever after to the Short-Horns, so that there is not probably a thousandth, or perhaps five thousandth part of the blood of that Galloway cow in any of the Alloy (as the descendants of the cross are called,) now living. Yet the English breeders think one of the Alloy can now be distinguished from a pure Short-Horn, by its appearance ! This cross once enjoyed — perhaps was written into — great popularity; but its reputation has waned; and there are many leading breeders in England who would not on any consideration have a valuable cow bulled by the best sire of the family. 132 CROSSING ENGLISH BREEDS. of form, of size, of length of wool, of quality of wool, etc., etc.; and on this he should keep his eyes as steadily as the mariner keeps his eyes on the light house, in the darkness, when on a dangerous coast. Even in using a fresh ram from an unrelated flock of the same family, (which is not crossing,) he should use one which conforms as nearly as possible to his standard. If he disregards this; if he uses rams now tall and long bodied, and now low and short ; now short and yolky wooled, and now long and dry wooled ; now fine, and now coarse — in a word, each varying from its predecessor in some essential quality — he will not, perhaps, break up his flock quite as much as he would by crossing equally at random, but he will do the next thing to it; he will give it an unsettled and unhomogenous character and materially retard, if not alto- gether prevent essential improvement. CROSSING BETWEEN ENGLISH BREEDS AND FAMILIES. — If we assume, with Mr. Youatt, that the long and short-wooled sheep of England are each respectively descended from common ancestors, they form but two breeds of sheep, according to the mode of classification adopted in this volume. There have been but a very few successful crosses between these two breeds. The Hampshire and Shropshire Downs, however, both ranked as first class sheep, and both officially classed as short-wools, have usually a dip of long-wool blood. The Oxfordshire Downs are the result of a direct cross between the Down and the Cotswold, and they are already claimed to be an "established variety."* But the instances of failure in blending the breeds have been so much more numerous than the successes, that the balance of intelligent opinion seems to be decidedly against such attempts. With them, as with the Merino, the successes in crossing between the different families of the same breed, have been numerous and signal. Mr. Bakewell, there is little doubt, was the first great improver in this direction, though we are scarcely authorized to cite his example, because, with a spirit much better befitting * In this and all similar instances, we should not forget that a breed regarded as " established " in England, might not prove so, literally, elsewhere. The English breeders, as a class, are men of education, and of ample wealth and leisure to choose materials for their experiments, devote time to those experiments, and sacrifice by weeding out, without regard to time or money. And by devoting themselves to the pursuit, and constantly comparing their opinions with other opinions, and their stock with other stock, among a whole nation of breeders striving to excel each other, they acquire a degree of knowledge, taste and skill on the subject which is professional, and which far exceeds that (within their own particular circle of breeding,) of any other people. And in no place lias Engligh breeding skill manifested itself more than in creating, moulding and "establishing" mutton breeds of sheep. CROSSING ENGLISH FAMILIES. 133 a nostrum vender than a reputable breeder, he veiled all his proceedings in the closest mystery, and even permitted the knowledge of them to die with him. Some therefore have, affected to believe that he resorted to different breeds, as he is known to have done to different families, in selecting his materials. But there are no proofs of the fact, and all the probabilities favor the conclusion that he adhered strictly to the long-wooled families.* Among the facts which would seem, by analogy, to favor the latter conclusion, was his own rigid in-and-in line of breeding, after his materials were selected. If he deemed such quasi-identity both in blood and structure necessary or favorable to the completion of his object, it can scarcely be supposed that he would have volun- tarily, and wholly unnecessarily, disregarded so great a discrepancy as that of a total difference.in breed, in its outset ; or, even that he would have spread his selection over any unnecessary number of families within the same breed. Mr. Bakewell's improved Leicesters have, since his death, again been improved by a dip of Cotswold blood. It is found to invigorate their constitutions, and to render them better in the hind quarters. The Cotswolds of the present day have generally been rendered a little more disposed to take on fat rapidly, and to mature earlier, by a Leicester cross. The New Oxfordshire sheep, as has been seen, is but a Cotswold improved by Leicester blood. The Hampshire and Shropshire Downs may be cited as conspicuous examples of successful crossing between the short-wooled families — for it is, in my opinion, mainly to these families they owe their peculiar excellence, and not to any strain of long-wool blood, where it exists in them. Various of the minor British short-wooled families have also been improved by crosses with the Down, and with each other. For another and merely temporary purpose, viz., to obtain larger and earlier lambs or sheep for the butcher, it is legitimate to cross between different breeds or families indis- criminately, where the object in view can be effected in the first cross. The nature of the Soil, food or climate may be unfavorable to the large, early-maturing mutton families, but sufficiently favorable to some smaller and hardier sheep; indeed, many such localities in all old countries have families, grown on them for many generations, which have gradually * This is decidedly Mr. Youatt's opinion, though, like other British writers, he uses the word breed to classify the different families (as they are termed in this volume) of the loug-wooled breed. 134 CROSSING ENGLISH AND LOCAL BREEDS. become so adapted to their surroundings, that conditions highly unfavorable to other sheep have become innocuous, if .not actually favorable to them. Yet these local families may "be ill adapted to meet the requisitions of the most accessible mutton markets, or, indeed, of any mutton market. They may be too small, too late in maturing, too indisposed to take on flesh, fat, etc. In such cases, rams of an improved mutton family — the family being selected with especial reference to the demands of the particular market and the defects to be counteracted in the local family — are put to the ewes of the local family, and the produce, as is usual with half-bloods, partakes strongly of the physical properties of the sire and yet retains enough of the hardiness and local adaptation of the dam to thrive and mature where the full-blood or high bred grade of the superior family could not do so. But in all such instances, the grower should stop with the first cross. If, seduced by the beauty of that cross, he makes a second one between the full-blood ram and the half-blood females, he ob- tains animals very little better than their dams for the purposes of mutton sheep, and decidedly less adapted to the local cir- cumstances. Accordingly, some portions of the local family should always also be bred pure by themselves, to furnish females for the cross. This last course is generally pursued among the breeders of England who make such crosses. It is wonderful that, with the highly successful example of the English constantly before us, in the mode of cross-breeding last described, it has not been more extensively resorted to in the United States. In the heart of the mutton-growing region on our Atlantic sea-board, there are very many locali- ties which, by the poverty of the soil, by the severity of the climate and the want of proper winter conveniencies, or by these causes combined, are rendered unfit to sustain the large English mutton breeds. But they sustain local varieties, or in default of these, Avould sustain the coarse, hardy " common sheep " of the country; and these bred to Down or Leicester rains would produce lambs which, with a little better keep, would sell, at four or five months old, for as much as the cost of their dams, so that, if the fleece and manure would pay for keeping, and if the number of lambs equaled that of the ewes (always practicable with such sheep when not kept in large numbers,) the net profit of 100 per centum would be annually made on the flock.* * Mr. Thome, whose superb South Downs have been described, finds his lands well adapted to the pure South Down, but his sheep of that family are too valuable CKOSSING ENGLISH AND COMMON SHEEP. 135 An analagous course of crossing might be resorted to with great profit by those farmers in our Western States, who prefer to make mutton production the leading object of their sheep husbandry, and who now grow those immense flocks of " common sheep," which are annually driven eastward to find a market. A single proper cross of English blood on these sheep would produce a stock which it would cost little -more to raise than it now costs to raise, common sheep irC the most profitable way, and which would habitually command 50 per cent, more in market and be ready for market a year earlier than the common sheep. They would require good feed and consequently not overstocked ranges in summer, and comfort- able sheds and an abundance of corn in winter. In regions where the latter can be grown more cheaply than its equiva- lent in meadow hay in the Atlantic States, nay, more cheaply than an equivalent of prairie hay can be cut and stored on the same farm, it is a sufficiently cheap feed ; and no one will fatten sheep more rapidly or produce more wool.* The value of the wool would not be lessened by any of the proper English crosses, and would be considerably increased by some of them. The selection of the English family for the purposes of the above cross should be made with strict reference to local circumstances. On rich, sufficiently moist lands, unsubject to summer drouth, bearing an abundance of the domesticated grasses, and near good local mutton markets, the unrivalled earliness of maturity in the Leicester would give it great advantages ; but it would bear no even partial deprivation of feed, no hardships of any kind, and no long drives to distant markets. The Cotswold is a hardier, better working and for breeding purposes, to be sold as mutton : and, living in the mutton-growing region, and having more land than is necessary for his breeding flock, he pursues the follow- ing course. He purchases the common sheep of the Western States — say, one part Merino to three parts of coarse-wooled varieties — as soon as they begin to be driven eastward, about mid-summer or a little later. He has generally, in past years, bought good ones from $2.50 to $3.00 a head. It is necessary that they have some Menno blood or they will not take the ram early enough. He puts them to a South Down ram as near as practicable to the first of September. The ewes are kept on hay in winter until just before lambing, when they get turnips, and after lambing, meal or bran slop in addition. The lambs are also fed separately. Theyiare sold when they reach 40 Ibs. weight, and all are generally disposed of by first of June. They have always brought $5 a head on the average. The ewes having only to provide for themselves during summer get into good condition, and a little grain fed to them after frost has touched the grass ripens them for the butcher. They, too, have sold for $5 a head, on the average. If the fleece, manure, and one dollar a head in addition, will pay for the keeping, this leaves 200 per cent, net profit. One hundred and fifty per cent, ought to leave a margin wide enough for all casualties. See Mr. Thome's letter to me in my Report on Fine -Wool Husbandry, 18ti2, p. 104. * I mean corn cut up and cured with all the ears on, and fed out in that state. The system of Western keeping and corn feeding will be fully examined in Chapter XXI of this volume. 136 ENGLISH BREEDS ADAPTED TO SUCH CROSSES. driving sheep, inferior to the Leicester in no particular, which would be very essential in such situations ; and I cannot but think that, for the object under consideration, those sub- families of it which have not been too deeply infused with Leicester blood, offer excellent materials for a cross. The different Down families will bear shorter keep than the pre- ceding, and will range over larger surfaces to obtain it. They are considerably hardier than the Leicesters, or those families of the improved Cotswolds which have much Leicester blood. They can endure slight and temporary deprivation of food better than the long-wools ; but it is a mistake to suppose that any mutton breed or family will fully, or profitably, attain the objects of its production, with- out abundance of suitable food being the rule, and depriva- tions of it any more than the occasional exception.* The Downs also produce better mutton ; and the dark legs and faces of the half-bloods always gives them a readier and better market. But the half-blood Downs would generally carry, less wool than the half-blood long-wools. In hardiness, patience of short keep, and adaptability to driving long distances, any of the half-bloods would surpass their English ancestors, and would, under the conditions already stated, generally flourish vigorously in our Western States. If the views here expressed of the value of such a cross are even approximately correct, the utility of embark- ing in it at once, and the immense advantages which would thereby accrue to individuals and to our whole country, must be apparent to all eyes. Though the crossing of mutton breeds has, in many instances, entirely different objects from those sought in crossing sheep kept specially for j;he production of wool, and though, consequently, the proper modes of crossing in the two cases often vary essentially, still the general views ex- pressed at page 130 in regard to unmeaning, aimless and unnecessary crossing, are as applicable to the English mutton sheep as to the Merino. RECAPITULATION. — I will now, for greater convenience of reference, recapitulate the principal positions taken in this chapter. I. That it is wholly inexpedient to cross Merino sheep with * I speak of course of sheep which are grown only for the tmtcher, the leading objects of whose production is high condition and early maturity. KULES OP CROSSING RECAPITULATED. 137 any other breed to improve the Merino in any of the charac- teristics now sought in that breed. II. That while an infusion of Merino blood is highly beneficial to unimproved coarse families, to increase the fineness and quality of their wool, it injures the improved mutton races more in size, early maturity, propensity to fatten and prolificacy in breeding than it benefits them in respect to the fleece, or otherwise. III. That no valuable intermediate family of permanent hereditary character has yet been formed, or is likely to be formed, by crossing between Merinos and coarse sheep ; and that the only successful continuous cross between them is when the object is to merge a coarse-wooled family wholly in the Merino, and when the breeding is steadily continued toward the Merino (i. e., when no ram is ever used but the full-blood Merino.) IV. That an infusion of the blood of one coarse-wooled breed has been supposed, in a very few instances, to benefit another coarse-wooled breed, but that as a general thing it is much safer to avoid all crossing between distinct breeds. V. That crossing between different families of the same breed, for the purpose of obtaining permanent sub-families, has, both among the Merinos and English sheep, resulted highly favorably in many instances ; but that, nevertheless, the instances of failure have been much more numerous ; that it is not expedient to cross even different families of the same breed for this object, except in pursuance of a well-digested and definite plan, founded on some experimental knowledge of the subject ; and finally, that siich crosses (like all others) should only be made when the necessary materials for the desired improvement cannot be found within one of the families (in other cases breeds) which it is proposed to cross together. VI. That crossing between different families of the same breed for the purpose of merging one family in another is still more likely to prove successful : but that, in attaining either this or the preceding object, it is desirable to unite families presenting the fewest differences, and to limit the cross to as few families as the circumstances admit of. VII. That for the purposes of mutton production it is highly expedient to breed rams of the best mutton families with ewes of hardier and more easily kept local families — but that, in such cases, it is almost uniformly advisable to stop with the first cross. That such a system to produce 138 BULKS OF CROSSING RECAPITULATED. early lambs for the butcher on sterile and exposed situations of the mutton region proper, or to produce earlier and better mutton on the natural pastures and corn-producing soils of the West, where its production as a leading object is preferred to the production of wool, would redound enor- mously to individual profit and to public utility. VIII. That with all breeds and families, crossing for the sake of crossing, without a definite and well understood object — under the vague impression that it is in itself bene- ficial to health or thrift, or that some benefit, the character of which cannot be anticipated, is likely to spring from it — is in the highest degree improper and absurd. That in using rams of the same breed and family taken from different and not directly related flocks, the utmost care should be used to select such only as conform as nearly as practicable to a uniform standard of qualities, which the owner should have previously adopted as the settled one of his flock. CHAPTER XIV. SPBING MANAGEMENT, CATCHING AND HANDLING TUKNING OUT TO GRASS TAG- GING BUBS LAMBING PROPER PLACE FOR LAMBING MECHANICAL ASSISTANCE IN LAMBING INVERTED WOMB MANAGEMENT OF NEW-BORN LAMBS ARTIFICIAL BREED- I\<; CHILLED LAMBS CONSTIPATION CUTTING TEETH PINNING DIARRHEA OR PURGING. CATCHING AND HANDLING SHEEP. — As nearly every operation of practical sheep husbandry is necessarily attended with the catching and handling of sheep, I will make these the first of those practical manipula- tions which I am now to describe. A sheep should always be caught by throwing the hands about the neck; or by seizing one hind leg immediately above the hock with the hand ; or by hooking the crook round it at the same place. When thus caught by the hand, the sheep should be drawn gently back until the disengaged hand can be placed in front of its neck. The crook is very convenient to reach out and draw a sheep from., a number huddled by a dog or in a corner, without the shepherd's making a spring for it and thus putting the rest to flight ; and a person accustomed to its use will catch moderately tame sheep almost anywhere with this implement. But it must be handled with care. It should be used with a quick but gentle motion — and the ERD,g caught sheep immediately drawn back rapidly "CROOK*? 8 enough to prevent it from springing to one side or the other, and thus wrenching the leg, or throwing itself down, by exerting its force at an angle with the line of draft in the * The cut represents the crook with but a small portion of the handle. This is made seven or eight feet long, of light, strong wood. 140 USE OF CROOK — HANDLING SHEEP. crook. Care must be taken not to hook the crook to a sheep when it is so deep in a huddle with others that they are liable to spring against the caught one, or against the handle of the crook, either of which may occasion a severe lateral strain on the leg. When the sheep is drawn within reach, the leg held by the crook should at once be seized by the hand, and the crook removed. A sheep should be lifted either by placing both arms around its body, immediately back of the fore-legs; or by standing sideways to it and placing one arm before the fore- legs and the other behind the hind-legs ; or by throwing one arm round the fore parts and taking up the sheep between the arm and the hip ; or by lifting it with the left arm under the brisket, the right hand grasping the thigh on the other side, so that the sheep lays on the left arm with its back against the catcher's body.. The two first modes are handiest and safest with large sheep ; the -third mode is very convenient with small sheep or lambs ; and a change between them all operates as a relief to the catcher who has a large number to handle. Under no circumstances whatever should a sheep be seized, and much less lifted, by the wool. The skin is thus sometimes literally torn from the flesh, and even where this extent of injury is not inflicted, killing and skinning would invariably disclose more or less congestion occasioned by lacerating the cellular tissue between the skin and flesh, and thus prove how much purely unnecessary pain and injury has been inflicted on an unoffending and valuable animal, by the ignorance or brutality of its attendant. * It cannot be too strongly enforced that gentleness in every manipulation and movement connected with sheep is the first and one of the main conditions of success in managing them. They should be taught to fear no injury from man. They should be made tame and even affectionate — so that they will follow their keeper about the field — and so that, in the stable, they will scarcely rise to get out of his way. Wild sheep are constantly suffering some loss or deprivation themselves, and constantly occasioning some annoyance or damage to their owner; and under the modern system of winter stable-management, it is difficult to get them through the yeaning season with safety to their lambs. * Let him who doubts the impropriety of lifting a sheep by the wool, have himself lifted a few times by his hair ! And let him who falls into a passion and kicks and thumps sheep because they crowd about him and impede his movements when feeding, or because they attempt to get away when he has occasion to hold them, &c., &c., test the comfort and utility of these processes in the same way — by having them tried on himself ' Snob a person o»i.gM not to lack this convincing Kind of experience. TURNING TO GRASS — TAGGING. 141 TURNING OUT TO GRASS. — In northern regions, where sheep are yarded and fed only on dry feed in winter, they * should be put upon their grass feed, in the spring, gradually. It is better to turn them out before the new grass has started much, and only during a portion of each day for the first few days, returning them to their yards at night and feeding them with dry hay. If this course is pursued, they make the change without that purging and sudden debility which ensues when they are kept up later, and abruptly changed from entire dry to entire green feed. This last is always a very perilous procedure in the case of poor or weak sheep, particularly if they are yearlings or pregnant ewes. TAGGING. — After the fresh grass starts vigorously in the spring, sheep are apt to purge or scour, notwithstanding the preceding precautions. The wool about and below the vent becomes covered with dung, which dries into hard knobs if the scouring ceases ; otherwise, it accumulates in a filthy mass which is unsightly, unhealthy, and to a certain degree dangerous — for maggots are not unfrequently generated under it. In the case of a ewe, it is a great annoyance, and sometimes damage to her lamb, for the filth trickles down the udder and teats so that it mingles with the milk drawn by the lamb, and often miserably besmears its face. I have seen the lamb thus prevented from attempting to suck at all. Whether the dung is wet or dry it cannot be washed out by brook washing : it must sooner or later be cut from the fleece and at the waste of considerable wool. Tagging sheep before they are let out to grass, prevents this. This is cutting away the wool around the vent and from the roots of the tail down the inside of the thigh, (as shown in cut,) in a strip wide enough so that the dung will fall to the ground without touching any wool. Wool on or about the udder which is liable to impede the lamb in sucking, should also be cut away — but not to an unnecessay degree during cold weather, so as to denude this delicate part of adequate protection. Tagging is sometimes performed by an attendant holding the sheep on its rump with its legs drawn apart for the convenience of the shearer. But it is best done by the attendant holding the sheep on its side on a table, or on a large box, covered, except at one end, and the breech of the sheep is placed at the opening, so that the tags will drop into it as they are cut 142 BUES — LAMBING. away. This is the only safe position in which to place a breeding ewe for the operation, when near to lambing, unless s it be on her feet — and tagging on the feet is excessively inconvenient. If a ewe is handled with violence, there is danger of so changing the position of the foetus in the womb as to render its presentation at birth more or less irregular and dangerous. But if the operation is performed as last described, and the catching and handling are done with proper care, there is no danger whatever. BUES. — Pastures containing dry weeds of the previous year, which bear burs or prickles liable to get into the fleece, should be carefully looked over before sheep are turned on them in the spring, and all such weeds brought together and burned. The common Burdock (Arctium lappa,} the large and small Hounds-tongue, or Tory-weed ( Cynoglossum offici- nale et Virginicum ;*) and the wild Bur-marigold, Beggar- ticks, or Cuckold, (J3idens frondosa,) are peculiarly injurious to wool. The damage that a large quantity of them would do to half a dozen fleeces, would exceed the cost of exterminating them from a large field. The dry prickles of thistles are also hurtful to wool, and they render it excessively disagreeable to wash and shear the sheep. They readily snap off in the fleece, when sheep are grazing about and among them in early spring. LAMBING. — It used to be the aim of flock-masters in the Northern States, to have their lambs yeaned from about the 1st to the 15th of May — particularly when Saxon and grade Saxon sheep were in vogue. Small flocks with abundant range would grow up their lambs, born even at this season, large and strong enough to winter well ; but in the case of large flocks they were not sure, or very likely to do so, except under highly favorable circumstances. The least scarcity of good fall feed told very destructively on them — and if there were those which were dropped as late as June, they generally perished before the close of winter. From the 15th of April to the 15th of May is now the preferred yeaning season among a majority of Northern flock-masters. Some, however, have it commence as early * The first named variety grows at the roots of stnmps and by the sides of decaying logs, etc., along road-sides, and in new cleared and other fields— the other grows more particularly in woods and thickets. The last variety has finer stems, and its burs are considerably smaller, but I think more difficult to remove from wool. PROPER PLACE FOR LAMBING. 143 as the 1st of April, and those who breed rams for sale, as early as the 10th or 15th of March. These very early lambs, if properly fed and kept growing, are about as much matured at their first, as late dropped ones are at their second shearing.* It is understood, of course, that lambs yeaned earlier than May, in the Northern States, must, as a general thing, be yeaned in stables. But this in reality diminishes instead of increasing the labors of the shepherd. The yeaning flock is thus kept together, and no time is spent traversing pastures to see if any ewe or lamb requires assistance, or in getting a weak lamb and its dam to shelter, or in driving in the flock at night and before storms. And the yeaning season may thus be got through with before it is time for the farmer to commence his summer work in the fields. PROPER PLACE FOR LAMBING. — Stable yeaning, too, is safest,- (though I once thought otherwise,) even in quite pleasant weather, provided the stables are roomy, properly littered down and ventilated, and provided the sheep are sufficiently docile to allow themselves to be handled and their keeper to pass round among them, without crowding from side to side and running over their lambs. While the stables should not be kept hot and tight, they should be capable of being closed all round ; and they should be so close that in a cold night the heat of the sheep will preserve a moderate temperature. On the other hand, they should be provided with movable windows, or ventilators, so that excess of heat, or impure air, can always be avoided. Excessive care is not requisite with hardy sheep in lamb- ing, and too much interference is not beneficial. It is well to look into the sheep -house at night, the last thing before going to bed, to see that all is well ; but then if all is well, many even of the best Merino shepherds leave their flocks undisturbed until morning, " holding that the lamb which cannot get up, suck, and take care of itself until morning in a clean, well-strawed, comfortable stable, is not worth raising. Our English shepher.ds, who have charge of choice breeding flocks, usually go round once in two hours through the night * We have' seen that Mr. Chamberlain, the importer and leading breeder of the Silcsian Merinos in this country, has his lambs dropped from November to February. Under the admirable arrangements of Mr. C., and under the admirable handling of his German shepherd, this works well, and a lamb is rarely lost: and being early taught to eat roots, ut it is dishonest and dishonorable by whomsoever it may be practiced. No one will deny that every man has a right to keep his sheep well, whether he proposes to sell them or not. Good keeping may be pronounced the custom of all breeders. I am not sure, indeed, that it is not necessary to certain breeder, the horse breeder, and the breeder of every other description ? The world has agreed to find fault with no class of producers for " putting the best side out," provided no deception is practiced and no injury done to the thing produced in thus fitting it for market. PAMPERING SHEEP. 197 improvements. For example, size cannot be increased, nor even kept up without abundant feed. The highest bred Short -Horn dwindles rapidly in size in each succeeding generation — however strong the individual and family tendency to size — if put on thin upland pasturage and fed only hay in winter. I do not suppose that Mr. Ellman could ever have raised the flat rib of the unimproved South Down to its present almost horizontal spring from the back-bone, had he suifered his sheep to remain ill -fed and empty — because, while it is true that the viscera adapt their size to the inclosing structures, it is equally true that the bony and muscular inclosing structures adapt their size and shape to the viscera. Whatever we may do, nature insists on and enforces harmony ! Good keep may be pronounced necessary to improvement in other particulars : but while the fire warms and cheers and strengthens, the conflagration destroys ! Knaves are generally very much puzzled to ascertain, in all such cases, where the good agency ends and the bad one begins. Men of common sense, common experience, and common honesty, labor under no such difficulties. They can decide at once between good keep and destructive pampering. CHAPTER XVIH. PALL MANAGEMENT. WEANING AND FALL FEEDING LAMBS SHELTERING LAMBS IN FALL FALL FEEDING AND SHELTERING BREEDING EWES — SELECTING EWES FOR THE RAM COUPLING PERIOD OF GESTATION — MANAGEMENT OF RAMS DURING COUPLING DIVIDING FLOCKS FOR WINTER. WEANING AND FALL FEEDING LAMBS. — Lambs of all breeds should be weaned at about four months old ; and if drouth or other circumstances have occasioned a particular scarcity of pasturage for the lambs and their dams, and the former can be put on good feed by separating them, it would be advisable to take off the lambs three or even four weeks earlier. The somewhat prevalent idea that it is improper to wean them in "dog days," has' not a particle of foundation. But whatever the period of weaning, sweet, tender pasturage is indispensable for them. New seeded stubbles and the rowen of meadows are usually reserved for them in this country. But many flock-masters prefer rested pastures — i. e., those which, after being fed close, are cleared of stock and allowed to spring up fresh. A few of our breeders of English sheep fold their ram lambs on rape. The modes of weaning and fall feeding lambs now practiced in England may interest the breeders of English sheep in this country. The following directions are from the Royal Agricultural Society's prize essay on the Management of Sheep, written by Mr. Robert Smith, of Burley, 1847 : " Lambs should never be placed upon rested summer-eaten clover pastures, however tempting they may appear, as they invariably cause scouring, fever and other severe ailments. Old grass, clover, or grass-eddish [after-math] is preferable until the autumn quarter commences, which is considered an important one, as much depends upon the manner in which the lambs are started, or taught to eat their winter feed. In WEANING AND FALL, FEEDING. 199 the middle of September the lambs are placed in moderate lots upon grass or seeds, as, from the domestic habits peculiar to the race, they are fond of picking their food at this season of the year, cabbages being thrown to them upon the pastures, or cut for them in troughs : after a short time a few white turnips are mixed with them as a preparation for the winter. As October advances they are placed upon the common or white turnips. Some breeders mix a little cole seed in the first sowing, wThich is an excellent plan. After a short time the wether lambs are given ^ Ib. of oil cake, or corn to that value, each per day ; at Christmas they are placed upon the Swedes which are cut for them, as also the white ones upon bad layer." In the " commended essay" * of Mr. T. E. Pawlett, on the same subject, 1847, occur the following statements: — "I have found lambs to thrive much better on old keeping — as red clover, sanfoin, or grass — than upon what are termed eddishes ; yet I must state that old white clover, or trefoil stubbles, are, when they are seeded and have become dry, the very worst of all kinds of food for young lambs. If, however, proper food cannot be provided for them, they should often have their pastures changed to keep them healthy, when a little oil cake or a few split peas or beans (one pint a day among four lambs,) would do them no harm. Having proved by many experiments the advantages of putting young lambs, after weaning, upon old keeping — namely, pastures that have been stocked from the commencement of the spring — over eddishes or pastures that have been previously mown the same season, I will state one experiment as a sample of the rest. In the year 1834, I put a lot of lambs on some old sanfoin, having a few tares carried to them, and another lot of lambs were put on young sanfoin, or an eddish which had grown to a pasture ; these, also, had some tares. Each lot was weighed at the commencement, and again at the end of the trial: " Gain in weight on a lot of lambs fed on old sanfoin, from July 10 to August 10, each on the average,.. 14& Ibs Lambg fed on sanfoin eddish, gained each in the same time, 8>£ Ib3 Difference, 6 Ibs." The moist, mild climate and constant rain, in England, affect pastures very differently from the scorching and often * This is headed as follows :—" A Commended Essay, written in competition for the premium awarded to Mr. E. Smith, by the Royal Agricultural Society, 1847." Mr. Pawlett is known as a distinguished breeder of Leicesters. 200 WEANING AND FALL FEEDING. very dry summers of the United States ; and as a general thing I have found good fresh rowen or after -math on meadows, or the new seeded grass in grain stubbles, better feed for lambs than rested pastures, unless the latter have been seeded the same or the previous year, and the grass on them is tender and fresh. Both of the above quotations, however, teach one valuable lesson to those who have not already learned it — the high importance of giving lambs generous keep from the time of weaning until winter in order that they may continue growing rapidly during that entire period. If by poor keep or any other cause, their growth is seriously arrested, and instead of the rounded plumpness of thrifty lambs, they put on the dried-up appearance of " little old sheep " — the poorer ones are likely to perish outright before the close of winter ; and by no amount of care or feed can the others be brought to the next spring equal with lambs which receive only common feed in winter, but which were kept properly through the fall months. Lambs, when separated from their dams for weaning, should, if the feed is good enough, be left for a few days in the field where the flock has been previously kept— their dams being taken away to a new one. The lambs are more contented and make fewer efforts to escape when thus familiar with the place. The two fields should be so far apart that they cannot hear each others' bleating. If this is imprac- ticable, the fence should be carefully stopped, for if a few lambs crawl through and again reach their dams, they will not give up renewing their efforts to escape and communicating their own restlessness to the others, for twice the usual weaning period. Two or three escapes establish a habit which it is difficult to overcome. It is a great advantage to put two or three very tame old crones which have not lambs of their own, or a lead wether, among the lambs, to teach them to come at the call ; and to lead them up to, and set them the example of eating salt, trough - feed, etc. The dams should be put on the dryest feed on the farm for a fortnight after separation, to stop their flow of milk. The udders of some of them may require to be milked out once or twice, and if these exhibit much redness and warmth, they should be bathed as recommended at page 158. Smearing the udders with a thick, pasty mixture of soap and water, after a previous washing in cold water, is sometimes resorted SHELTERING LAMBS IN FALL. 201 to. I have already sufficiently adverted to the high import- ance of preserving the udders of breeding ewes in a perfectly normal condition. When entirely dried off, they should be put on good feed to get into condition for winter. As soon as the fall frosts have touched the grass, it is highly beneficial — nay, it is indispensable in good sheep farming — to give lambs some kind of artificial feed. Turnips are (I am sorry to say,) but little raised among the great mass of our sheep farmers, and rape and cabbage are nearly unknown as field crops. Any of these would be vastly cheaper than grain feed ; but in default of them, grain feed should be given. At first a little sprinkling of oats, shorts, bran or the like should be put once a day in troughs, in their pasture. By keeping them from salt on other occasions and salting their trough feed very slightly, they, led up by the crones, will first nibble at and then eat it ; and when even a few do this, the rest will rapidly follow their example. A spoonful of oats a head is more than enough to begin with ; and when they get well to eating, this may be gradually increased to half a gill per head — and before winter to a gill, or to its equvalent in shorts, bran, or other grain. Bran and shorts, or shorts and oats, mixed half-and-half, are proverbially good feed for lambs. An addition of turnips to these would leave nothing to desire. Indian corn, in despite of the fears entertained of it by some persons, for that object, is also an excellent lamb feed ; but it must be given more sparingly. A bushel of it is equivalent to its weight in oats.* SHELTERING LAMBS IN FALL. — Sheltering lambs from the heavy, cold rain-storms which fall for a month or a month and a half before the setting in of winter, in our northern latitudes, is now beginning to be practiced by all the best flock-masters ; and when the ground becomes wet and cold, and frequently freezes, toward the close of autumn they should also be regularly housed every night. It is well to have racks of hay ready for them in their stables ; and it is very easy to learn them to eat grain, etc., there. If it is regularly placed in the troughs over night, with a very light dusting of salt, as before mentioned, but two or three days will elapse before it will be regularly and entirely consumed. Getting * A bushel of corn weighs 68 Ibs., a bushel oats 32 Ibs., by the rule established in New York. 9* 202 FALL TREATMENT OF BREEDING EWES. the lambs accustomed to the stables before winter, is in itself no inconsiderable advantage. FALL FEEDING AND SHELTERING BREEDING EWES. — It is a common and very truthful saying among observing flock- masters, that "a sheep well summered is half wintered." Breeding ewes should be brought into good condition by the time the first killing frosts occur. After that, they should not be suffered to fall off*, but be kept rather improving by feeding them, if the condition of the pastures render it necessary, with pumpkins, turnip-tops, and any other perishable green feed on the farm — and after these are exhausted, with turnips. If some of the oldest and youngest ewes remain thin, they should be separated from the others and fed rather better — grain not being withheld, if it is necessary to bring them into plump condition before winter. Shelter from late, cold storms, though not as important as in the case ol lambs, is very desirable, and there can be no doubt that with persons possessing convenient and commodious sheep stables, it will well pay for the trouble to put up breeding ewes nights whenever the weather is raw and the ground wet and cold. * In default of artificial green feed, hay or corn stalks should be regularly fed to sheep — once or twice a day, according to circumstances — as the pasturage becomes insufficient for their full support. A singular idea prevails among a class of our farmers, in regard to fall feeding sheep, which has been handed down from those days when the two dozen gaunt, "native" sheep which belonged to a farm and which roamed nearly as unrestrained as wild deer through field and forest, did not " come in to the barn " before the groraid was covered with snow. In coppices, on briars, and in swamps where the water kept the snow dissolved — and by digging in the fields — they even found subsistence until the snow became deep and so packed and crusted by sun and wind as to prevent their reaching the ground. They then retreated to the barn- yard, usually lank enough! But every farmer knows the immense difference whether in the fields in summer, or in the * My own flocks have generally been too large and spread over too much surface, to render housing from storms practicable until the sheep are brought into their winter quarters ; and if well kept, they certainly do well enough without it. But I housed a flock of lambs last fall, and I thought the benefit was very obvious. I have repeatedly observed the same thing in other men's flocks — particularly in Vermont. In that State, fall housing is almost as common, and is regarded as almost as indispen- sable, &a winter housing. This is probably somewhat a question of climate. FALL TREATMENT OP BREEDING EWES. 203 stable or barn-yard in winter, between recruiting up and getting into condition two dozen, or two hundred lean, reduced sheep. The little handful of "natives" choosing every morsel of their food over one or two hundred acres of land, through the summer, had high condition to fall back on, in the pinch of the early winter ; and when put into the barn- yards with the cattle and young horses, tiiey still chose all the best morsels of the hay — robbing the latter animals — so that they not only made a shift to live, but usually got round to the next spring in tolerable order. True, when let out to grass again, their condition began to change so rapidly that they frequently shed off nearly all their wool — so that many of them had not half a pound a piece at shearing ; and those which escaped this were very likely to have their fleeces half ruined by cotting. But what of all this ? This was the way things were done in those days ! Brought up under such traditions, many of our older farmers who consider it highly essential as Avell as profitable to give their cows, horses and other animals, artificial and extra feed a month before the winter sets in, consider every pound of fodder bestowed on sheep at that time, so much taken from the profits which these animals are bound, under all circumstances, to yield to their owners — a total loss ! A more absurd and pernicious notion could not prevail. If sheep could withstand the effects of such treatment with as little danger to life as the horse or cow, it would still occasion a much greater proportionable loss in their products.* But they can not. The former are capable of being raised at any period of the year, from the lowest condition of leanness, without danger. The muscular and vascular systems of the sheep are so much weaker, that if they become reduced below a certain point in winter — and if they herded together in considerable numbers — their restoration to good condition is always difficult and doubtful, and, in unfavorable winters, impracticable. Their progress thenceforth is frequently about as follows : If fed liberally with grain, their appetites become poor and capricious, or f they eat freely it is followed by o "petting" or enervating system of treatment. I have not five times ears fed hay or grain, or brought in the body of my store sheep from pastures, before the fall of snow — which generally occurs in this from the first of December. But I should have done it in all cases, if * I urge no "petting" or enervating system of treatment. I have not five times within thirty years fed ha their summer climate not far . they had not sufficient feed in their pastures. In this respect I would put them on precisely the same footing with cows and horses. And I would sooner limit the feed of either of them in the winter, than during the month preceding winter. Unless the fall feed was unusually abundant and good, I have always fed my lambs and crones pumpkins, turnip tops, grain, etc., and a little hay as soon as they would eat it. 204 FALL FEEDING OF BREEDING EWES. obstinate and enfeebling diarrheas. Low, obscure forms of disease seem to attack them and become chronic. The strength of the lambs and of the very old sheep, rapidly fails. They scarcely move about. The skin around the eyes becomes bloodless. The eyes lose their bright, alert look, and yellow, waxy matter collects about and under them. A discharge frequently commences from the nose — perhaps the result of a cold, but how or when taken it is frequently difficult to say. The viscid mucus dries about the nostrils so that they cannot breathe freely without its removal. The evacuations become dark colored, viscid, and have an offensive odor. The strength fails more rapidly; the sheep becomes unable to rise without assistance ; and it falls when jostled to the least degree by its associates. It will taste a few morsels of choice hay, but generally the appetite is nearly gone. Some, however, will eat grain pretty freely to the last. Finally, it becomes unable to stand, and after reaching this stage, it usually lingers along from two or three days to a week, and then, emaciated, covered with filth behind, and emitting a disgusting fetor, it perishes miserably. Post mortem examination shows that this is not the rot of Europe. Some American flock-masters term it the " hunger rot." If to this could be added something to express the fact that the hunger which engenders it, usually occurs in the fall, before the setting in of winter, it would be an admirably descriptive name ! * It is true, that entering the winter poor does not prove equally destructive in all instances. Its effects doubtless may be materially enhanced or diminished by the regularity and excellence of the winter management, the nice condition of the feed, etc., or the reverse of these conditions. And the character of the winter itself exerts a very marked influence. Sheep thrive best when the temperature is compar- atively steady — no matter how cold. A cold, blustering, stormy winter is preferable to one of greatly milder tempera- ture, if its fluctuations are frequent and great — storm and thaw, rapidly succeeding to each other. There comes occasionally what farmers term a "dying winter," when almost any adverse conditions become fatal — and when almost every disorder assumes an epizootic, malignant and fatal type. Certain specific, diseases, like cold, catarrh, pulmonary affections, diarrheai -dysentery, etc. — the most common ones * It might not inappropriately be termed the "fall-hunger rot." SELECTING EWES FOR THE BAM. 205 which are of a dangerous description — are far more liable to attack sheep when in low condition. And it is surprising with what destructive effect ticks will work on very poor sheep and lambs. The latter are sometimes literally depleted and irritated to death by their blood sucking. I have specially and strenuously urged the point of bringing sheep into the winter in good condition, because it admits of no doubt that this, far more than any other one item of management, constitutes the sheet anchor of all successful sheep farming. There is a point of importance which I have overlooked in the preceding statements. A flock of ewes which are in inferior condition, and especially if they are at the time running down, will not take the ram as readily as a fleshy, thriving flock. It will take six or seven weeks to get the bulk of them served, and then a number of them will " miss," especially if the weather is very cold. A high-conditioned flock is often served in about thirty days. The saving of time and trouble at lambing, and the superior evenness and value of a flock of lambs which is obtained by having them all yeaned within a few days of each other, is well known to all sheep farmers. Many flock-masters give their ewes extra feed during the coupling season, to promote this object. A little sharp exercise, like an occasional run across a field, is thought by many to excite ewes to heat — but I have never tried the experiment. SELECTING EWES FOB THE RAM. — Where there is an opportunity to choose between several valuable rams, the selection of the ewes to breed to each, requires judgment and careful study. The flock of ewes should be examined, the individual excellencies and faults of each, and her he/editary predispositions and actual habits of breeding, so far as can be ascertained, fully taken into account ; and then she should be marked for the ram, which, in himself, and by his previous get, appears, on the whole, best calculated to produce improvement in their united progeny. Many of the Vermont farmers thus divide their small flocks of ewes into parcels of ten or twenty each, and take them to rams owned by a number of different breeders : for, by a prevailing custom, the liberality of which cannot be too highly commended, all the most distinguished breeders of that State allow other persons to send ewes to their best stock rams for a merely nominal compensation, considering the advantages which are often 200 COUPLING RAMS AND EWES. thus secured.* This enables the owners of flocks who can not afford to incur the serious cost and risk of keeping a number of high-priced stock rams, to obtain, notwithstanding, the services of those which are best adapted to breeding with each class of their ewes. And the young or less skillful breeder can thus, too, obtain the immense advantage of using the most perfect sire rams in the country — those which are too costly for his purchase f — and those which will improve his flock more in the first generation than he could possibly otherwise improve it in five generations. COUPLING. — Very few flock-masters now feel that they can afford to bestow the whole annual use of a choice, high- priced ram on the seventy-five, or at the very utmost, on the one hundred ewes he can serve, if he is permitted to run at large with them; and to accomplish this, he must be a very strong animal, and must be taken out of the flocks nights and fed by himself. And no even tolerably good manager turns two or more valuable rams at the same time into the same flock to waste their strength, J excite, worry, fight, and perhaps kill each other. Even the ewes are frequently injured by the blows inflicted by a ram while another ram is covering her. There are several different modes of putting ewes singly. Some keep "teasers" in the flock so " aproned "§ that they can not serve a ewe, and daubed with lard and Venetian red under the brisket, so that when a ewe will stand for them she is marked red on the rump. The flock is driven several times a day into a small inclosure (usually a sheep barn,) in apartments of which the stock rams are kept, the " redded " ewes are drawn out and each is taken to the ram for whicli she is marked. After being served once she is turned into the flock of served ewes. * The customary price has been from $1 to $2 per ewe — but I am informed that some leading breeders will feel themselves under the necessity of raising the price of service. t Some of the more celebrated stock rams whose services are thus let, would sell for more than the entire flocks of many of those who hire their services ! $ The question is sometimes asked whether the cohabitation of two males with the same female, occasions superfetation, or conception after prior conception. When there are two or more progeny at the same birth, facts have occasionally occurred which appeared to show quite conclusively that they were begotten by different males, but such cases are exceptional ; and when there is but one progeny, no facts ever go to show that it is the combined progeny of two male parents. § The apron is a piece of coarse, open sacking, which covers the belly from the fore to the hind-legs, and extends half way up each side. Careful persons tie or buckle it over the back at both ends and in the middle, and then fasten it from slipping back by a strap round the breast, and from slipping forward by a strap around the breech. Though allowed to bag a little in the middle, the urine soon renders it a very dirty affair. When I last used teasers, I kept the same one in a flock only every third day. PERIOD OF GESTATION. 207 Another mode is to use no teasers, but to drive in the flock selected for a particular ram twice a day, and let him loose in it ; and as soon as a ewe is served to draw her out. After three or four are served, the ram is returned to his quarters, and the remainder of the flock to the field. A very vigorous ram may be allowed to serve from eight to ten ewes a day. This last mode is now generally preferred. It takes up but little more time than the other. It saves the expense and trouble of keeping teazers, which must be frequently changed ; for after making their fruitiest efforts for two or three days, they generally almost cease to mark ewes. Lambs and yearlings are nearly useless as teazers. Good stock rams ought not to be put on this service, for it rapidly reduces them in condition. Any mode of effecting the object in view — one on the correct management of which the success of breeding so much depends — must be conducted with rigid accuracy, so that the mark on the ewe shall in all cases indicate the ram actually used. An erroneous record is vastly worse than none. It misleads the owner, and cheats the purchaser who buys with reference to its showings. The served ewes should be returned to the ram after the thirteenth day. If they come in heat again, it is usually from the fourteenth to the seventeenth day; but the number is ordinarily quite small if the ram is a good one, and is well managed. * PEBIOD OF GESTATION. — The time during which ewes go with young frequently varies upwards of a week — in some unusual cases, nearly two weeks. They usually go longer with ram than with ewe lambs. The average period of gestation does not usually vary much from one hundred and fifty-two days. MANAGEMENT OF RAMS DURING COUPLING. — Whatever system of coupling is adopted, the ram demands extra care and feed during the season of it. Whether taken from the flock only at night, or kept from it entirely except when * A ram which has been ill, or overworked, may not get lambs one year and may prove a sure lamb-getter the next. Sometimes rams fail in this respect in the opening of the season, but not subsequently — or rice versa. Occasionally a Merino ram is hung so low in the sheath that he cannot serve a ewe. If he is valuable, some persons give him the advantage of a platform, raised three or four inches. Others buckle a broad strap tight enough around his body to elevate the point of the sheath sufficiently. With some rams confinement to dry feed a few days is all that is necessary. 208 MANAGEMENT OP EAM8 IN COUPLING. covering, his separate inclosure should of course be dry, clean and comfortable — properly ventilated and lighted : and it is better that it entirely seclude him from seeing or hearing the ewes, except when he is admitted to them. It should also be strong enough to defy his utmost efforts to escape.* He should have fresh water in a clean bucket (no sheep freely drinks dirty water, or out of a dirty bucket,) at least three times a day — the choicest of hay — and be fed on grain morning and evening. That mixture of oats and peas which is produced by sowing three bushels of the former to one of the latter — with one-quarter part of wheat added, constitutes an admirable grain feed, when the ram's powers are severely taxed. A quart of this mixture daily, and sometimes even more, is often fed to a good-sized, mature animal, which has been used to hard service and high feed. It would, however, cloy the appetite, if the feeding was not commenced two or three weeks in advance of the coupling season and gradually raised to that point. This should be done not only to prevent that result, but to give the ram a degree of preparation for his work. He ought, by no means, however, to be shut up in his stall without exercise during this preparatory period. It is not to be understood that the precise mixture of feed above recommended, is indispensable. But all the articles named contain a very large proportion of those nitrogenized matters which produce muscle, or lean meat, and consequently strength, energy and activity, — while Indian corn, oil meal, etc., contain an excess of carbon which tends to the production of fat. The ram demands the former, and is only encum- bered by any excess of the latter. One rule is to be kept steadily in view in feeding a ram during the coupling season. He should not be fed more at a meal than he will consume briskly and cleanly. If he leaves any part of his • allowance, it should be removed from his manger ; and if this is found to be habitual, the allowance should be reduced. I regard it as highly inexpedient to keep two rams in the same inclosure or room at this period, however well one may seem to be subjected to the other. Jealousy often provokes even the weaker one to make battle : and an animal of great value may be sacrificed by a chance blow. The modes of putting ewes and managing rams I have * Powerful Merino rams which have acquired the habit of breaking inclosures, will often dash through the side of a barn, or knock a stable door from its hinges, at the second or third blow. They are " battering-rams," indeed I DIVIDING FLOCKS FOR WINTER. 209 recommended demand some expenditure of time and labor. It -would probably consume all the time of an active shepherd properly to take care of four hundred and fifty or five hundred ewes and the number of rams required to serve them, during the ordinaiy coupling period of thirty-five or forty days : and if he had but two hundred and fifty or three hundred to take care of, it would still consume all his time. But the labor of one or .two men for that period, Avould be a very trifling matter compared with the benefits thus secured. These directions are not, of course, intended for the owners of cheap, common flocks who are aiming at no important improvements, and who would regard $25 an enormous price to pay for a ram, and who oftener do not pay more than $5.* But for the last ten if not twenty years preceding the late rise in the price of sheep, those Merino and English rams which breeders regard as first class ones, have sold for at least $100 a piece — frequently for twice or three times that amount, and, as already remarked, no property is more precarious. When the period fixed on for coupling is over, it is generally decidedly best to separate the rams from the flock and keep them separated until that period again recurs. If rams are allowed to run with the ewes either in winter or summer, there is always a chance of having lambs come at very unseasonable times. Eating at the same rack or trough in winter with horned rams, is dangerous to breeding ewes. If the former are cross the danger is great ; but even if not, the ram, in making his way to the rack through a crowd of ewes, is liable to inflict unintentional injury on those in advanced stages of pregnancy. DIVIDING FLOCKS FOR WINTER. — In latitudes where sheep are fed dry feed, and are kept confined to stables and small yards in winter, even Merinos will not bear herding together in large numbers. They should be divided into separate lots before, and preparatory to, going into winter quarters. It is better that these lots be made as small as convenience permits, and not exceed 100 each. The sheep in each should be as nearly uniform in size and strength as practicable, or otherwise the stronger will rob the weaker, both at the rack and trough, and will jostle them about * I could illustrate the curious kind of economy sometimes exhibited in regard to rams, by naming an individual residing on the borders of this (Cortland) county, •who has within the last five years allowed 60 good ewes owned by him to go without the ram one year, rather than pay $10 for a decent one, which was offered him at that price! 210 DIVIDING FLOCKS FOR WINTER. whenever they come in contact. Breeding ewes, wethers and weaned lambs, should always be kept in separate parcels from each other, in well regulated flocks. Sheep which are old and feeble, late born lambs, etc., had better be sold at any price or given to a poor neighbor who has time to nurse and take care of them. But if kept by the flock-master, they should be put by themselves in a particularly sheltered and comfortable place where they can receive extra feed and attention. This is usually called "the hospital." English sheep should be divided into still smaller parcels, and with the same regard to age, condition and sex. CHAPTER XIX. WINTER MANAGEMENT. WINTER SHELTER — TEMPORARY SHEDS HAY BARNS WITH OPEN SHEDS SHEEP BARNS OR STABLES CLEANING OUT STABLES IN WINTER YARDS LITTERING YARDS CON- FINING SHEEP IN YARDS AND TO DRY FEED. WINTER SHELTER.— It has already been assumed that a degree of winter shelter is requisite for the most profitable management of sheep in all parts of the United States. The Merino can withstand far greater exposures to extremes and to rapid fluctuations of weather, than any other improved or really valuable breed. In Spain it was unsheltered. In Western Texas — in that magnificent sheep-growing region which lies immediately north of San Antonio — it has been claimed that it requires no shelter ; but facts- which I shall allude to hereafter incontestibly prove the contrary. SHED OF POLES. TEMPORARY SHEDS. — Adequate shelter in warm regions like Western Texas, demands no arrangements which would be at all expensive in a well-wooded region, or where sawed timber could be obtained at moderate prices — for the cheapest form of open shed (i. e., open on one side,) would answer the purpose. Or, excellent sheds might be constructed with logs or poles. The pole shed is made as shown above. 212 STELLS BARNS WITH OPEN SHEDS. This is covered with straw, reeds, sods, brush, clay, or anything else which will prevent the wind and rain from driving through it. It is decidedly improved by raising the lower ends of the poles two feet by means of a log, stone- wall, .or a bank of earth or sods. CLUMPS OF TREES AND STELLS. — If one generation would be persuaded to make arrangements for another generation, good sheep shelters could be cheaply formed, and on the most comprehensive scale, by planting clumps or belts of woodland, for that purpose, on the vast timberless plains of the South- west. Evergreen trees would be far preferable, if they could be obtained, and would flourish in the situations where they are required. With stone walls or hedges on the west and north, even a small clump of such trees would form a far better stell than many of those which are used on the bleak and storm-swept highlands of Scotland, — which consist of walls alone. Larger clumps would answer without the walls ; but they should be sufticient to protect sheep from the fury of the wind, which renders cold vastly less endurable by them — particularly when it follows a rain which has penetrated to their skins. For this object, and indeed for all objects, naked stells composed merely of high stone walls, board fences, or double lines of poles with straw, sods or earth filled in between them, are far better than no protection. HAT BARNS WITH OPEN SHEDS. — In all the States lying south of 40 deg., open sheds are sufficient winter protection for Merino sheep, and probably so for the English mutton varieties, — though perhaps the high-bred New Leicester would, in many situations, find more protection profitable at some periods of the year. Hay barns and sheep sheds like those on the following page, or of some analagous construction, were much in vogue in the Northern and Eastern States, a few years since. But there were many difficulties about them, in the climates of those States. Snow often blew under the sheds when the wind was in front ; and in severe gales, even when the wind was in their rear, it drifted over from behind — piling up large banks immediately in front, which gradually encroached on the sheltered space, and filled its bottom with water whenever there was a thaw. If a cold storm, or a very freezing temperature occurred at lambing time, these open sheds did not sufficiently exclude BARNS WITH OPEN SHEDS. 213 the cold; and they did not prevent the ewes going out of them to lamb, or from leading their new-born lambs out at very unseasonable times, to follow the movements of the flock. SHEEP BARN. No female animal is more attached to her young than the ewe, but none exhibits less providence in protecting it from any danger, except by setting it an example of running from those which terrify and demand flight.* If the ewe needed * Even then, if seriously frightened, she generally runs directly away from the danger without stopping for her lamb if it cannot keep up. She has not the remotest idea of sheltering it from cold by the warmth of her own person, or any apparent consciousness that anywhere, or under any circumstances, it is weaker or tenderer or more exposed to danger than herself. We read anecdotes of a very contrary tenor among sentimental writers, and naturalists who wish to enliven their narrations, or sustain some favorite theory. These anecdotes are very pretty — sometimes affecting; but unfortunately in ninety-nine cases out of a hundred, untrue ! Jessie, for example, expatiates on the fact that the ewe with twins does not allow one of them to suck until the other is ready to share in the meal. Now every practical sheep farmer has been a thousand times provoked by seeing a ewe, followed by one strong, fat twin lamb which she allowed to fill itself at pleasure, moving restlessly about, without waiting for, or seeming to have any care for, its mate, which was born weaker and less able to follow— and which is being starved to death in consequence of its weakness. Even Mr. Youatt talks of special attachments between particular sheep, and of their " alternately sheltering each other from the biting blast and the suffocating drift." He quotes from the Shepherd's Calender the following statement : — " When a sheep becomes blind it is rarely abandoned to itself in this hapless and helpless state: some one of the flock attaches himself to it and, by bleating, calls it back from the precipice, and the lake, and the pool, and every kind of danger." (Youatt on Sheep, p. 375.) I have no doubt that the half wild breeds in the mountains of Scotland, and in other regions where they are left almost in a state of nature to obtain their food and take care of themselves, retain far more of their natural instincts than the more thoroughly domesticated sheep. They will band together to fight an enemy, and it is said the ewe will fight a fox or small dog in defence of her lamb. I never saw an instance of either, among the Merinos. I never saw one sheep render another any direct or intentional assistance of any kind unless the following are instances of it. There are a few rams which will not permit a stranger to catch out one of their ewes when they are together in the winter yard. I own such a ram now, and even his attendant has to act with great caution under such circumstances. Whether the precise object of the ram is to protect its associates, I am unable to say. The Merino, removed to moun- tains or great plains, and removed from the constant control and supervision of man, may acquire, or resume habits more necessary in such situations. 214 SHEEP BARNS OB STABLES assistance in lambing, or if the lamb required to be helped to the teat, it was difficult to catch her conveniently in an open shed. SHEEP BARNS OR STABLES. — For all the preceding reasons, barns or stables for the winter shelter of sheep, now receive universal preference in the Northern and Eastern States. These are generally constructed — and always should be — so that they can be closed as tightly as ordinary horse or cow-barns. But they require doors sufficient for ventilation and exposure to the sun in fine weather, and for the ingress of a farm wagon to haul out manure. And by means of movable windows, or slides covering apertures in the walls, they should be capable of being thoroughly ventilated at any time, with the doors closed. When these close sheep barns first came into use, each was generally made large enough for seventy-five or one hundred sheep ; and they were scattered about the farm so as to be contiguous to the meadows from which they were to be filled with hay, and so the manure made in and about them would only require hauling a short distance. There was another argument in their favor. If a contagious or infectious disease broke out in one of the divisions of the flock, it did not necessarily extend to all ; and, theoretically speaking at least, the fewer the sheep which inhale the same local atmosphere the freer from impurities it must remain. But serious inconveniences were found to attend this system. It required almost a double outlay of materials and expense to build separate barns and prepare separate yards, arrangements for watering, etc., for each flock. These scattered barns required the farmer or his shepherd to wade wearily two or three times a day, mounted or on foot, for long distances through sheets of snow which the winds generally rendered pathless; and oftentimes, and even for days together, to do this amidst blinding snow-storms or the most terrible extremes of cold. Much shoveling was constantly necessary to give the sheep access to water, etc. If the supply of hay happened to fail at one of these distant barns, it was often more trouble to get it there, than it would have been to cart all the hay consumed in the barn to a central one near the farm-house, and haul all the manure made from it back. These barns were inconvenient at lambing time, because the constant attention which one man could give to all the breeding ewes at once, if in the same or contiguous buildings, was necessarily divided up between the several scattered parcels of them, leaving but little time, compara- SHEEP BARNS OR STABLES. 215 tively, for each. And, finally, the farmer was not so apt, under such circumstances, to see all his sheep daily with his own eyes ; nor was either he or his shepherd half so prone to turn out in the night to take care of the sheep or the lambs, provided a change of weather, the rising of a gale, or any other circumstance rendered it expedient.* It is now usual to construct the sheep, like the horse and cow barns, near the farm-house. When the farm flock does not exceed about three hundred, it is often wintered in a single barn which has separate apartments, holding from seventy-five to one hundred sheep each ; and each apartment has a separate outside yard. The upper story of these barns is devoted to hay for the sheep : the under one is eight feet high, and floored on the bottom if it is necessary to insure perfect dryness. It is common to take advantage of a slope in the ground, and by means of a small amount of excavation, so to place the sheep barn that while the doors of the basement story open on a lower level, those of the second story open upon a higher level, or on the surface of an ascent, on the opposite side — so that hay can be drawn on wagons into the upper story. This is something of a convenience, and was a great one before the invention of the horse pitch-fork. The side of the lower story which supports the bank of earth resting against it, is generally composed of stone -wall — this being necessary both for strength and durability. In various states of the atmosphere this wall exudes moisture, or, as it is termed, "sweats," — diffusing dampness through the apartment. Unless that apartment is far higher, more spacious and better ventilated than would otherwise be necessary, this dampness is unques- tionably prejudicial to the health of sheep. The better course would be, where such a barn is thought desirable, to build it entirely independent of the bank-wall and connect them with a short bridge. The usual way of dividing the lower story of the sheep barn into apartments for different parcels of sheep, is simply * For example, I remember some twenty or twenty-five years since to have had several hundred ewes with young lambs left out on a warm and'beautiful night in early May, in four adjoining fields. A little after midnight I was wakened by the first howl of a north-easter, which was accompanied by a blinding snow-storm. This was a case to say come instead of go. In fifteen minutes three of us, with our lanterns, had started for the fields about half a mile off: and we worked on until 9 o'clock the next morning in getting in the sheep, and half frozen lambs, and in resus- citating the latter. We probably saved a hundred lambs which would have perished before morning, Had these sheep been out in the same number of parcels half a mile from each other — some of them a mile and a half from my house — what chance would there have been to save the great body of the younger lambs ? 216 SHEEP BARNS. by placing feeding racks across them — so that in reality the sheep are all in one room. This mode is a material saving both of space and expense; and it is highly convenient, inasmuch as the partitions can be changed in a moment to adapt them to any change which it is desirable to make in the relative number of sheep in the different apartments. But it must be obvious that any. considerable number of sheep when thus kept breathing the same indoor atmosphere, require that the means of ventilation be abundant and most thoroughly kept in operation. Indeed, I should prefer, as a matter of prudence, not to place more than one hundred and fifty sheep in the same room, though divided into smaller flocks on the floor. With different rooms, and with independent means of communicating with the external air, four hundred or six hundred could be kept, perhaps, just as safely, under the same roof, unless during the prevalence of infectious or epizootic diseases. But who can be certain that these will remain absent ? On the whole, such large and close aggregations of sheep are inexpedient. The room required for a given number of Merino breeding ewes in a barn is, for Paulars, about ten and two-thirds square feet of area on the floor each ; in other words, an apartment twenty by forty feet in the clear will accommodate seventy-five, so that they can all eat at the same time at single or wall racks placed round the entire walls, except before the doors. A room forty feet square will accommodate one hundred and fifty, but it requires forty feet of double rack* to be placed in the area inside of the wall racks. Larger Merino, or English ewes, require more room in proportion to their size. Some of the last would probably require nearly twice as much room per head. A sheep barn should open on the side least exposed to the prevailing winter winds ; and its yards should be placed as much as practicable under its shelter. Some persons build these barns in the form of an L, to break off the winds from different quarters ; others make a high stone wall or board fence a substitute for one of the limbs of the L. The yards are inconveniently narrow if restricted to the breadth of the inside apartments ; and should, therefore, be widened accord- ing to circumstances. The following ground plan is intentionally confined to a * I here use the word single or wall-rack to signify one made to set against a wall, which can only be eaten from on one side — the word double rack, to signify one which can be eaten from on both sides, so that forty feet of one is equivalent to eighty feet of the other. SHEEP BAKNS AND YAEDS. 217 mere outline of a very simple and compact sheep barn, which is under a single roof, has no waste space, and makes the utmost use of all its materials. Three diiferent modes of watering are presented, either of which is sufficient, and the choice between them should depend upon circumstances. Cl PLAN OF SHEEP BARN AND YARDS. a, a, a, a, Apartments or stables in sheep barn, 20 by 40 feet. The central parti- tion a close one, with single racks on each side. The other two partitions composed of double racks. Single racks round all the outside walls except at doors. 6, 6, Watering tubs, when water is brought into barn in pipes. e, c, c, A door in central partition and gates in the other two partitions. d, d, d, d, Sheep yards, 30 feet wide ; the two outside ones 60 feet long ; the two inside ones 52 feet long : thus arranged to allow the four flocks of sheep to drink from the troughs of one pump-house at e. e, Pump-house and troughs for four yards, if water is not carried into the barn at b, b. /, /, Pump-houses and troughs, each accommodating two yards, provided neither of preceding plans of watering are available or desirable. Sheep barns are often connected with other farm buildings, such as horse stables, wool rooms, ram stables, etc. The following is the plan of Mr. Hammond's sheep establishment.* His house, wood-sheds, etc., stand south of the barns, so that they principally break the force of the wind from that quarter. * Except a slight char barn. in respect to wool room, which stands detached from 10 218 SHEEP ESTABLISHMENT. A>0 X f-o / /• Yards before each apartment of sheep stables, fi'i ff, ff, Watering places, each supplying two apartments. Whatever plan is adopted for a sheep barn, certain things are indispensable. It should stand on and be surrounded by CLEANING OUT STABLES IN WINTER. 219 dry ground; occupy an elevated, airy position, but one as little exposed as possible to prevailing winter winds ; be of easy access to water ; possess ample capacity for the number of sheep to be kept in it ; and have means of thorough ventila- tion in every state of the atmosphere. The hay floor above the sheep stables should be matched or battened, so as entirely to prevent dust, hay seeds, or chaff from sifting through on the sheep. It should have pens in the sheep stables to throw the hay in from above when feeding, so that it cannot fall on the backs of the sheep or be run over by them.* Every gate, door, fastening and fixture about it should be strong and secure. CLEANING OUT STABLES IN WINTER. — It is rather the prevailing custom among Northern flock-masters not to clean out their sheep stables in winter, but merely to cover the manure occasionally with fresh litter. This is unquestionably bad practice, in two particulars. It certainly prevents making anything like the amount of manure which could be formed by mixing the dung and urine of the sheep with an amount of litter which would half fill the sheep stable, if suffered to accu- mulate there throughout the winter. And there can be no reasonable doubt that a deep bed of manure, which, except during severely cold weather, is constantly heating, evolving gases, and filling the apartment with a warm steam and the odor of fermenting dung, and which, after a decided thaw of a few days, positively produces an offensive stench, can not form a very healthy lair for sheep. It is rather the prevailing opinion now among the best flock-masters, that the increased practice among Merino sheep of pulling their own and each other's wool in the winter, is occasioned by an irritation of the skin caused by lying on these beds of heating manure. Unstabled flocks do not, so far as I have observed, thus become addicted to " wool-biting." Stables should be cleaned out three times during each -winter, say in the early part of January, the latter part of February, and in April. And in the interme- diate periods, it is an excellent practice always to strew the manure on the floor with plaster (gypsum,) prior to covering it with fresh straw. This absorbs the escaping gases, and thus not only preserves the purity of the atmosphere, but vastly enhances the value of the manure. * Some, instead of this, shut the sheep out of doors when filling the racks. But the state of the weather, as, for instance, in a winter rain-storm, or the situation of the sheep — say when they are lambing — sometimes renders this highly improper. 220 YARDS — LITTERING YAKDS. YARDS. — I by no means wish to be understood to express the opinion that sheep yards should, for any purpose of utility, be restricted to the narrow dimensions of those given in the preceding ground plans. I rather consider those the least dimensions which can be regarded as proper ; and if convenience equally admitted of it, I would prefer to have them much more spacious. They should be constructed on dry, firm, thoroughly drained ground ; and a gravelly soil rapidly permeable by surface water, and which quickly dries, is much preferable to a clayey, tenacious soil, or a peaty or mucky one which retains moisture. All the yards ought to have separate access to water, and, if practicable, separate access to different fields. This last fact renders the plan of yards given with the first of the preceding ground plans objectionable, unless the two middle flocks can be let into diiferent fields through doors in the opposite side of the barn. That plan merely saves the digging of one well ; and I should much prefer to dig the two wells (at/,/,) and have the yards of equal length, and each possessed of separate and indepen- dent egress and ingress.* LITTERING YARDS. — Strawing or otherwise littering sheep yards in winter in the most thorough manner, is a matter of prime importance. If sheep are compelled to stand or move about in mud or water whenever out of doors, the most liberal feeding and good management in every other partic- ular, will hardly preserve them in the best condition. They should have a comparatively dry out-door bed to stand on in wet weather, and a warm one in cold weather. The sheep — or at least all the upland breeds of sheep — find one of the worst enemies of their health and thrift in habitual wetness under foot. Muddy yards prevent sheep from moving about out of doors and spending a portion of the time in the sun and fresh air, in pleasant winter weather ; promote fouls ; render hoof rot incurable ; and cause lameness and annoyance to sheep which have sound feet, when a sudden freeze converts the small pellets of mud which adhere to the hairs in the forward part of the cleft of the foot, into pellets of stone. A little straw is excellent feed for sheep. If it is scattered over * By gates opposite each other on the eight-feet passage — one of them opening entirely across it on the side of the outer yards — a separate passage could be obtained ; but this would not be very convenient, and when the passage was thus closed, the sheep in the outside yards would not have access to the water trough at e. CONFINEMENT TO YARDS AND DRY FEED. 221 the yard they will " pick it over," eating the best parts, and leaving enough to keep the littering constantly renewed. • CONFINING SHEEP IN YARDS AND TO DRY FEED. — A decided majority of Northern flock-masters prefer the strict confinement of sheep to their yards during the entire winter. They contend that the slightest taste of the pasture during thawing weather takes off" the appetite from hay, and that sheep are equally healthy and even more thrifty under such confinement. I dissent from both conclusions. If sheep, long kept from the grass by deep snows, are suddenly admitted to it in consequence of a winter thaw, and if they are allowed wholly to subsist on it for a number of days — as long as the thaw continues — they unquestionably lose condition and strength on herbage which has been rendered innutritions by age and by repeated freezings and tliasvings. Thin breeding ewes and young sheep sometimes suffer materially in this way, particularly in the critical month of March. When returned to their confinement and to dry feed, they have no vigorous appetite for it, and consequently do not recover from their debility. In certain unfavorable seasons they pine, and eventually perish, if not solely from this cause, yet with the fatal termination accelerated and rendered more inevitable by it. Stronger sheep recover from* its effects — but of course any check in the thrift of a flock results in a proportionable loss in some of its products. Having habitually and regularly fed turnips daily to breeding ewes, young ewes, rams, and wethers, (when I have kept the latter,) for the last fifteen or twenty winters, I am enabled to affirm, of my own positive knowledge, that green feed, administered in proper quantities, does not in the least diminish the appetite for dry feed ; and that proper green feed, so far from weakening, adds to the condition and strength of sheep, besides producing other good effects which will be adverted to when I speak of the relative value and influence of winter feeds. The experience of the great body of English farmers fully sustains these conclusions. The prac- tice of wintering sheep exclusively on dry feed — say on meadow hay and straw, with or without grain or pulse — is substantially unknown in the arable districts of England. For sheep of every class not to receive green feed daily would there be an exception ; and fattening sheep receive it in abundant quantities. The winter grass in our own Northern States, though 222 CONFINEMENT TO YARDS AND DRY FEED. comparatively innutritious, is, in the absence of better green feed, a healthful change in the diet of pregnant ewes. It keeps down the tendency to costiveness, habitual to females in that situation, and in conjunction with that exercise which is required to obtain it, renders the system less subject to the plethora, which is also natural in pregnancy, but which is greatly fostered by rich food and inactivity. But to attain these objects, the sheep should be let out an hour a day, instead of the entire day, in warm winter weather. It should obtain a small portion of its feed, instead of the whole of it, from the fields. Sheep, like other animals, spontaneously diminish their amount of . exercise as they advance in pregnancy, and it thence may very properly be inferred that they require less of it than at other times to preserve a healthy condition. It is also undoubtedly true that excessive or fatiguing exercise is positively injurious at this period. But if we can trust to established physiological principles, or to the teachings of analogy, the sudden change produced in the habits of an active, roving animal, by rigid confinement from the com- mencement to the close of gestation — accompanied by a complete alteration of diet — must be attended by baneful consequences. Are we told that pregnant sheep thrive and grow fat in this confinement — fatter than when they are let out on the fields ? This is true, and it is one of the dangerous incidents of the system. Pregnancy of itself favors the taking on of flesh; and when this tendency is aided by concentrated and highly nutritious food, and by entire inactivity, the condition established is rather that of plethora — high condition attended by an unnatural excess of blood — than of the healthy fleshiness which comes with natural feed and exercise. We know that the sow which is confined closely to the pen and fed to fatness on wholly artificial food never farrows in safety. We should esteem that farmer beside himself who confined his mares and cows to little dry yards and to dry feed during the whole term of pregnancy. The most celebrated practitioners of medicine allow no such changes of habit among their human subjects during this period. I can not do better than to quote the sensible remarks of Dr. Bedford on this subject. He says : " Allow me here to remark that, as a general principle, if the pregnant female observe strictly the ordinances which na- ture has inculcated for her guidance ; if, for example, she take EXERCISE AND GREEN FEED NECESSARY. 223 her regular exercise in the open air, avoid, as far as may be, all causes of mental or physical excitement, employ herself in the ordinary duties of her household, partake of nutritious and digestible food, repudiate luxurious habits, * * * * if, I say, she will steadfastly adhere to these common sense rules, the reward she will receive at the hands of nature will be general good health during her gestation, and an auspicious delivery, resulting in what will most gladden and amply repay her for her discretion — the birth of a healthy child. * * But if in lieu of these observances, the pregnant woman, pursue a life of luxury, leat, drink, and become merry,' neglect to take her daily exercise, and prefer her lounge — the case is entirely reversed, etc.*" I might swell quotations of the same tenor to a volume : for such are the settled opinions of the whole medical profession. Am I asked where the injurious effects of the close confinement of sheep to small yards and dry feed have manifested themselves ? I suspect that they have manifested themselves in the prevailing and destructive loss of lambs which annually takes place in our flocks. Why is it that with better shelters and conveniences of every kind, and with greatly increased skill as shepherds, the body of American Merino flock-masters do not raise a larger per centage of lambs than they did twenty or ihirty years ago? I have already expressed the opinion that eighty per cent, is still as high as the general average, taking a series of years together, though I know many small flocks in which 90, 95, and occasionally 100 per cent, are raised. The American Merino is a much larger and better formed animal than it was twenty years since, and though it has undoubtedly lost something of that locomotive power and energy which it possessed when it was compelled to make a journey of eight hundred miles each year in Spain, it remains a far hardier animal than the improved English sheep, and it is less subject to parturient difficulties and diseases.f Yet the English sheep rear from * Principles and Practice of Obstetrics, by Gunning S. Bedford, etc., etc. New York, 1862, p. 131. t Mr. Youatt enumerates among the defects of the Merino, " partly attributable to the breed, but more to the improper mode of treatment to which they are occasion- ally subjected" in Spain, " a tendency to abortion or to barrenness ; a difficulty of yeaning ; a paucity of milk, and a too frequent neglect of their young." (Youatt, p. 149.) The tendency to abortion is not greater in the American Merino than in the English ewe: the former does not so often experience difficulty in yeaning : and it is decidedly loss subject to parturient fevers. It has, however, a greater -'paucity of milk," a greater tendency to barrenness, in the sense in which I presume Mr. Youatt 224 CONFINEMENT TO YARDS AND DRY FEED. thirty to fifty per cent, more lambs ! Our English flocks, it is true, are usually small ; and among the established natural characteristics of the ewes are those of bringing forth twin lambs and having a sufficient supply of milk to raise them /. But they also, so far as my knowledge extends, fewer lambs. How is this to be accounted for? „ If the Merino is a hardier animal than the mutton sheep, its lamb, it would seem, ought also to be hardier. And so I have no doubt it is, if it is born in a perfectly well developed, normal condition, and if it gets anything like a corresponding supply of milk. It is not among such that the annual losses among our lambs occur. Those which perish are generally undersized and feeble, or else they do not obtain sufficient support from their dams. It is these causes and failure to take the ram. which keeps the rate of increase so low in Merino flocks. This comparative want of prolificacy is the weak point — now really the only one for the purposes for which they are grown — of our American Merino sheep. Yet no other point has received more of the care of those breeders who have been so successful in improving them in every other particular. Their comparative failure is occasioned by no obstacle inherent in the breed, as I could show from a variety of considerations and direct proofs, did space admit of it. If it can be shown that there is a radical error in our modes of management — that we habitually compel the pregnant ewe to violate " the ordinances which nature has inculcated for her guidance" — need we go further to find the causes of that failure ? Can we wonder that lambs are born imperfectly developed when ewes are rigidly confined for five or five and a half months — through the entire term of pregnancy — in little yards ; and even then fed almost invariably within doors — so that they have no inducements left to take the least degree of exercise — and so that more than four -fifths of the whole time they are inhaling the atmosphere of a stable, without going out into the fresh air and sunlight? Can we wonder that an animal which obtains its en- tire summer subsistence from green vegetation does not secrete milk abundantly, and can not be bred to secrete it abundantly, when, from the first to the last day of gestation, it is unnat- urally restricted to exclusively dry food ? And when young and not fully matured ewes, or old and decaying ones, or here uses the word, i. e., it oftener fails to take the ram. Literal barrenness, or a want of the power of conception, is almost unknown in the Merino ; and its failure to take the ram, generally, springs from incidental and not necessary causes. THE CAUSE OF WANT OF PROLIFICACY. 225 poor ones of any age — the classes which furnish the principal portion of those which do not breed* — are suddenly subjected to the commencement of the preceding changes, about con- temporaneously with that great fall of temperature which usually attends the setting in of winter, can we wonder that the depressing effects of all these combined causes should prevent cohabitation ? It has already been stated as a well established fact, that not only low condition, but anything which, for the time being, lowers the condition, tends to produce that effect. Even ewes in the most suitable situation for coupling, viz., in good, plump, store order and improving in condition, at the time, often wholly cease to take the ram in severely cold weather. And as winter advances, the heats of the Merino ewe are less to be relied upon. Many American Merino sheep breeders, on reading this, Avill say: — "I have used small yards, fed generally in the stables, fed nothing but dry feed in winter, for ten, fifteen, or twenty years, and I have always had good success in lamb raising." But what proportion of these breeders, whose breeding ewes count up even to one hundred and fifty, would be able to show from contemporaneous records, or would dare to affirm as a matter of positive recollection, that they had on the average, for any consid- erable term of years, raised either 100 per cent, of lambs, or any very close approximation to that number? Yet can lamb raising be considered successfully carried on, or a breed to have reached its highest attainable standard in this particular, when a selected flock of only one hundred and fifty breeding ewes can not be made annually to raise their own number of lambs ? There is a material difference in the prolificacy of the English and Merino sheep — first produced, in all probability, by the different modes of artificial treatment to which they were subjectedf — but long since established as permanent and hereditary characteristics of the different breeds : but I do not entertain a shadow of doubt that were the most prolific English families of sheep subjected to the same winter treat- * If there are "dry ewes" in the flock, 1. e., those which raised no lambs the preceding year, and they are allowed to become very fat, they too, are very apt not to become, as the English Shepherds say, "inlambed." t The Spanish sheep were subjected neither to confinement nor dry feed, in the winter, in Spain — but there being no object to increase their number they were not allowed to raise over 50 per cent, of lambs; and consequently prolificacy was not culti- vated. While their constant migrations gave them extraordinary general vigor, they did not tend to develop their milking properties. 10* 220 CONFINEMENT TO YARDS AND DRY FEED. ment which we give to the bulk of our American Merinos, half a dozen generations would find them seriously degene- rated in prolificacy. Occasionally there comes a year when double, treble and even quadruple the usual number of our lambs perish. The causes and symptoms appear to be the usual ones, but aggravated and extended by an epizootic influence. I have (at page 154,) described the appearance of the lambs, and the singular degree of mortality which prevailed among them in the spring of 1862. An extraordinarily deep snow fell in the early part of winter, and it was replenished about as fast as it wasted away until the opening of spring. It was remarked that most of the breeding ewes clung very closely to their stables — doing little more than rising to eat and then lying down again. Those flocks most accustomed to close yarding in many instances did not tread down the snow a dozen yards from their stables during the winter. But the weather was steady and cold, so that they continued to eat well, and the hay of that season was generally of good quality. Thus their inactivity increased their fleshiness, and their fleshiness re-acted and increased their inactivity. They generally reached the spring in uncommonly high order. They appeared to be well — but yet there were unmistakable symptoms of a plethoric habit in the best fed flocks : and it was in the best fed flocks that the loss of lambs was, as a general thing, far most severe. Putting all these facts together, I have been disposed to trace this mortality in lambs to the condition of the mothers — the unfavorable condition being aided by an epizootic influence.* Is it asked why a proportionable degree of mortality does not habitually attend all unusual confinement of breeding ewes, and why, in 1862, it did not extend its destructive ravages to Vermont, where the snow was equally deep and laid still longer on the ground? When it is explained why the directly exciting causes of various destruc- tive diseases among human beings, lie comparatively dormant * Having, from inability to fix upon any descriptive or definite name, termed this imperfect state of the lambs of 18(52, which resulted in such wide spread death, " the lamb epizootic of 1862," (in some articles which I published on the subject in the Country Gentleman,) several writers appeared to think that I intended to charac- terise it as a contagious, or infectious disease. An epidemic, or epidemy, is defined in Dunglison's Medical Dictionary to be " a disease which attacks at the same time a number of individuals, and which is depending upon some particular constttutto aeris, or condition of the atmosphere, with which we are utterly ignorant." And he defines epizootia (epizootic) to be " a disease which reigns among animals — corresponding in the veterinary art to epidemy in medicine." This correction is made simply to prevent similar misconceptions in regard to the use of the word in this work. OVER FEEDING AND WANT OF EXERCISE. 227 for years in a particular region — producing only sporadic or separate cases ; why, in other years, when all the proximate causes appear to be the same, some one of those diseases assumes an endemic or epidemic form, desolating neighbor- hoods or provinces ; and, finally, why, at the height of its fury, it passes round and spares this household or that, or this neighborhood or that, and frequently leaves as well defined margins as the track of a tornado, although the population was as dense without as within its track; — when, I say, these anomalies are explained, we shall be able to explain the one under consideration. And let it be remembered that the same anomalous facts will continue to exist, to stand as much in the way of the true as of a false theory of explanation. I am not tenacious for the acceptance of this explanation. I merely offer it as the most probable one within my knowledge. Better observed facts may hereafter throw more light on the subject. I do not wish to be understood that restriction to dry feed is necessary to produce that condition of the ewe which I have assumed to be so prejudicial to the offspring. On the contrary, I think it would be produced, though hardly so readily or to so dangerous an extent, by an over-supply of good, green feed, attended with the same other unhealthy auxiliaries. It is the high condition, the excess of blood,- the excited vascular system ready to assume or produce inflam- matory action, which produce or co-operate with the morbid tendency to non-development in the foetus. Indeed, high condition alone, may, to some extent, offer a mechanical ob- struction to its development. The internal fat of the dam may so far obstruct the full distension of the womb that the foetus can not grow to its full size anterior to birth. I urge letting out breeding ewes on the fields for a limited time each day, because no animal more intensely craves a portion of green food in the winter ; and I consider nature or instinct a first-rate judge of its own wants : because the small portion of green feed obtained from the fields can exert no injurious influence whatever in any direction, while it prevents the costiveness peculiarly incidental to pregnancy, and by keeping the bowels in an open and regular state, has a strong tendency to avert all unhealthy action or agencies ; because traveling about and digging in the snow for green feed affords a most necessary and healthful exercise ; and, finally, because a neglect " of these ordinances which nature has inculcated " 228 MODES OP INSURING EXERCISE. for the guidance of the pregnant ewe, has been followed by wide -spread disaster, under circumstances which at least give much color to the hypothesis that they are connected together as cause and effect. It by no means follows from anything which has been said, that sheep require a very extensive winter range on grass. I should decidedly object to their being allowed to feed down all the grass lands on the farm at this period of the year, and particularly the meadows. A few moderate-sized old seeded pastures about the sheep barn, with a good amount of grass left on them, in the fall, would answer every purpose; for the sheep with its fluted teeth will not only take the grass but some portion of its very roots. It wants but little each day, and the harder it works to obtain it the better it is. Those who raise turnips for the sheep must obtain exercise for them in some other way. A stack to feed from at noon in fine weather, a quarter of a mile from the sheep barn, is an excellent arrangement ; and who does not recollect the old- fashioned, lively and merry scene of hauling out hay on an ox-sled far from the dirty farm yard — the great oxen hurrying forward as if satisfied some frolic was going on — the feeder tossing the fragrant flakes right and left — each succeeding flock pursuing with a Babel of cries — some of the yoitng ones bounding and kicking their heels into the air as if greatly enjoying their fine run over the snow ! I made it a rule in entering upon the writing of this book, to look little after authorities where I believed the facts were established by my own observations ; but the necessity of winter exercise for sheep seems to be a much controverted,, question in this country, and therefore I have largely' consulted the best European writers on the subject. I have thus far been unable to find one who mentions the subject at all, without distinctly insisting on the necessity of exercise ; and when the destructive lamb epizootic of 1862 was termi- nating its ravages, I addressed letters to a number of the oldest and soundest breeders in our country, describing the disease as I saw it, and asking their opinions as to it origin. To no one did I suggest my own theory of that origin. In every instance, I believe, the want of exercise was put forward as either the leading cause, or as a cause second to no other in its effects. Several also stated that they thought the sheep " had been kept too long from the ground." CHAPTER XX. WINTEB MANAGEMENT - CONTINUED. HAY KACKS WATER FOR SHEEP IN WINTER AMOUNT OF FOOD CONSUMED BY SHEEP IN WINTER VALUE OF DIFFERENT FODDERS NUTRITIVE EQUIVALENTS MIXED FEEDS FATTENING SHEEP IN WINTER REGULARITY IN FEEDING. HAY RACKS. — A great variety of racks for sheep have been introduced into use, but for double and portable ones for ordinary purposes, those of the form exhibited in the annexed cut are generally preferred. The corner posts are 2 by 2| or 3 inches in size, and are 2 feet 8 or 10 inches long — some- times 3 feet, where the racks are to be used as partitions. The side an(l erld. Boards are an inch thick, the upper ones six and the lower ones nine inches wide. The perpen- dicular slats are three-fourths of an inch thick, seven inches wide and seven inches apart, fastened to their places by wrought and well clenched nails. Each slat requires four nails, instead of two as represented in cut. The slats are highly useful in keeping in hay, but their principal object is to prevent the sheep from crowding. They give every sheep fourteen inches at the rack while eating. This is a liberal allowance for the Merino; but the English sheep requires more room. The ordinary breadth of the rack is two and a half feet, and the length depends upon circumstances. Those intended to be moved often are usually made ten feet long. They should be so light that a man standing inside of one of them can readily carry it about. Single or wall racks to be used against the walls of stables and other places where the sheep can approach them but on 230 HAY HACKS, ETC. one side, are often constructed like one side of the box rack and attached to the walls by stay-laths. Some arrange them so that they can be raised as the manure accumulates ; but there is no need of this if they are made with the bottom boards a foot instead of nine inches wide, and if the manure is cleaned out as often as it should be. But a far neater and more convenient wall rack, having troughs also connected with it, was invented by Mr. Virtulan Rich, of Kichville, Vermont. * The following cut, from a drawing kindly furnished me by that gentleman, gives an easily understood general view of it : WALL BACK AND TROUGH. a, Plank 2 inches thick and 9 inches wide, placed 20 inches from wall (e,) to form bottom rail of outside rack. ft, Scantling 3 by 3 inches, forming top rail of outside rack. c, Bottom of trough, being a board placed on floor, or if there is no floor, on scantling to raise it sufficiently from ground. d, Board five inches wide, to support the board 4 inches wide, which forms bottom of the inside rack (/.) These would be better made of plank. Bottom of inside rack should be (i inches above bottom of trough. e, Outside wall of barn or stable. f, Inside rack hung with hinges to bottom board. It is made by nailing slats 1}£ inches wide, 3 inches apart, on upper and lower rails, which are about 11A by 2 inches in diameter. g, Slats to outside rack 7 inches wide and 7 inches apart. h, Slanting board, from bottom of inside rack to bottom of trough and forming back side of trough. The end-views of the same rack (on next page) render the details of its construction a little more apparent. The left hand cut shows the inside rack (/,) in its place as when filled with hay. In the right hand cut, it is turned up or thrown * I have previously, in this volume, named the Messrs. Rich as of Shoreham. This is the name of the town in jvhich they reside, and was until recently the name of their Post-Office. The latter is now Kichville. HAY BACKS, ETC. 231 back on its hinges as when grain or roots are being put in the trough (c,) or the trough is being cleaned out. The advantages of this rack are, 1, That it prevents crowding as well as the slatted box-rack ; 2, That it prevents sheep from thrusting their heads and necks into the hay, as they can do to some extent in the slatted box-rack, thereby END VIEW OF WALL BACK. getting dust, hay-seeds and chaff into their wool ; 3, That it almost entirely prevents the hay which is pulled from the inside rack from being dropped under foot and wasted ; * 4, That it combines the advantages of a good stationary feeding- trough with the rack ; 5, That the trough, apai't from its ordinary uses, is found very convenient to keep hay-seed out of the manure when it is is desirable to do so, and to catch and save hay-seed for use. WATER FOR SHEEP IN WINTER. — Sheep, and particu- larly sheep fed Avith roots, will do very well in winter without water if they have a constant supply of clean snow ; but that supply can never be relied on. And when watered at a pump or stream a portion of the time, they (particularly pregnant * A considerable quantity is wasted from all slanting racks with small, close rounds (like the inside rack /, in the cut ;) and some is thus wasted even from the slatted box rack. A sheep on being jostled by another, steps back from the rack frequently dragging out quite a lock of hay, which is immediately trodden under foot and hardly ever picked up. 232 WATER FOE SHEEP IN WINTER. ewes) suffer if again forced to depend exclusively on eating snow. Consequently, a regular supply of water throughout the winter should be regarded as indispensable. It becomes still more so, where sheep are housed and yarded. In winter climates cold enough frequently to congeal water, the most convenient arrangement, where it is practicable, is to bring it directly into the sheep barn, by means of underground pipes from a spring or dam of sufficient elevation to force it up into tubs. These should be placed in the middle partitions, (as seen in the two plans of sheep barns in the preceding Chapter,) so that each tub shall supply two flocks of sheep. If different tubs are supplied from the same spring, each must have a different pipe, or else the tubs must be at different elevations, so that a waste pipe from the higher one will go up into the bottom of and fill the lower one. When the surplus water is finally discharged into the ground, it should be by a waste-pipe emptying into a deep, well-made drain, which will never become clogged. An accumulation of ice in a sheep stable, or any overflow of water into the bedding, would be a nuisance far more than overbalancing all the conveniences of indoor watering. The tubs should rise but a few inches above the floor, and should, if they have much depth, have well secured but movable covers to prevent sheep and lambs from falling into them — the covers having holes cut through them barely large enough to enable the sheep to drink.* Two plans for outdoor watering are given in the ground plan at page 217. As I have already stated, I decidedly prefer that which exhibits two wells and pump-houses (at/", /,) because free egress from all the yards, independently of each other, could thus be much more conveniently secured. Each well or cistern should be fitted with a pump of a construction which forces up water very rapidly, and which does not admit of its being frozen in the body of the pump, if some special precaution chances to be forgotten. Small pump houses, which can be shut tight and provided with proper conductors to the troughs, guard against numerous accidents to pumps, prevent ice accumulating inconveniently about them, and render it so comparatively comfortable to water sheep in very cold and blustering weather, that there is * As the tubs are constantly forced full of water the sheep need not even put its head through the cover to drink ; and elliptical holes through it 4K by 5 or 5yt inches, for the mere insertion of the nose, are all that is required. If the tub waters two ames shold have two holes on each side. , apartments it should have two holes on each CONSUMPTION OF FOOD IN WINTER. 233 much greater probability of its being properly attended to. Some persons place sheds over the troughs also, to prevent snow from accumulating about them, and to offer greater induce- ments to the sheep to visit them in stormy weather. The troughs are placed lengthwise with and under the fence (as at e, in cut page 217,) or crosswise with the ends projecting (as aty, y, in same cut.) If the sheep are watered pretty early in the day, the water will generally be lowered so often by drinking that thick ice will not form over it, and the sheep will usually keep drinking holes open. But the shepherd should look to this ; and in severely cold weather he should water the flock two or three times a day, (so that all will be likely to drink once,) and then by withdrawing a plug in the bottom of the trough, let off the water into a drain underneath. A brook of sufficient volume and current not to freeze deeply, brought near to the sheep yards, is an admirable addition to a sheep farm, both in summer and winter ; and when it can be had, no other mode of watering is necessary. The banks at the drinking places should be so sloped that there will be no difficulty in a number drinking at once, and no liability of a sheep being crowded off a high bank or into deep water ; and the approach to and bottom of the drinking place should be thoroughly gravelled. I should, however, consider such a brook bought quite too dearly, if the sheep were compelled to wade through it whenever they entered or left their yards — even if the water did not usually exceed three or four inches in depth. Every approach to the yards, crossed by a stream, requires a bridge. AMOUNT OF FOOD CONSUMED BY SHEEP IN WINTER. — It is now generally estimated that, taking the average of winter weather in our Northern States, American Merino and grade Merino sheep kept exclusively on hay, require about one pound of good hay, or its equivalent, per diem, for every 30 Ibs. of their own live weight — to be kept in that plump condition somewhat short of fatness, which is usually regarded as the most desirable one for store sheep. Mr. Spooner adopts the same rule in regard to the consumption of English sheep. * VALUE OF DIFFERENT FODDERS. — In most of the Eastern and Southern counties of New York, in similar regions of * He says " sheep grown up take 3 1-3 per cent, of their weight in hay per day to keep in store condition." Spooner on Sheep p. 217. 234 NUTRITIVE .EQUIVALENTS. Pennsylvania and throughout New England — the grazing region proper of the older-settled Northern States — the favorite meadow hay for sheep is produced by sowing about three parts of timothy (Phleum pratense) to one of red clover, (Trifolium pratense?) The first and second years, the clover is in excess, but after that it only appears in moderate quan- tities ; and in the meantime many spontaneous clovers and grasses come in, such as June or spear grass, (Poa pratensis,} white clover, (Trifolium repens,) red -top or herds -grass (Agrostis vulgaris) in moist places, and various others in minor quantities and in special situations, such as the rough-stalked meadow grass, (Poa trivialis,} rye or ray grass, (Lolium perenne,} and several of the fescue grasses. For sheep, this collection of grasses and clover is cut down rather early and cured as bright as possible. Where meadows are not brought into a course of arable husbandry, and are only plowed at long intervals, no better hay could be obtained from the soil; and, indeed, better would hardly seem desirable. But those who have tested it, know that red clover cut early and cured bright is preferred by sheep, and will fatten them more. It is a prevailing impression, too, among clover growers, that it more specially conduces to the secretion of milk when fed to breeding ewes. NUTRITIVE EQUIVALENTS. — But it is not economical in most situations, to winter sheep exclusively on any kind of hay. There are incidental products raised with other crops which are regarded as necessary in even that limited extent of mixed husbandry which is practiced on our sheep farms, such as corn-stalks, the straws of the different grains, pea-haulm, etc., which must be consumed in part by the sheep, or be wasted ; and there are other crops which, like turnips and beets, are, so far as they can properly be fed, vastly cheaper than hay. Moreover, a well-selected variety in food is better, other things being equal, than uniformity : because the different products furnish more of all the different substances which go to form wool and meat. It is, therefore, incumbent on the intelligent sheep farmer carefully to study both in theory and practice, the effect of each of the kinds of available food, separately or in combination, to produce these results. Agricultural Chemistry has made new and important disclosures in this particular ; and though its theoretical deductions cannot be implicitly relied on, owing to excep- tional or incidental circumstances which have thus far eluded NUTRITIVE EQUIVALENTS. 235 detection, still they usually approximate sufficiently near to the truth to be of great value to the farmer. Before offering any comments on them, I will proceed to lay some of these before the reader, in connection with a very valuable table of experimental deductions. TABLE OF NUTRITIVE EQUIVALENTS. Theoretical values according to Practical values, as es iug experiments, ace mated by direct feed- ording to « I \ ii 100 100 200 20( lit: 201 M 5 I | , lot 100 1QO 1 1 1(10 I 100 90* 442 195 "374 153 308 339 .... "45 45 Meadow hay 101 47 Si ss: 4C,( 42< a 101 77 527 44f 471 ttl 7 200 200 2;^; Oat straw, 401 40( .... Wheat straw Swedes 201 271 201 88 54 ":! 34 Ml 366 21 ( B B 41 H 2r,( 201 54 54 •. 2- 70 " " 50 Peas | 9 (14 t § 6 £ ~( r>< 35 37 33 30 54 59 "45 105 Oats . .- ft 7 81 Tii Kye, 5 5 G 8 a 2 5 5 B 51 46 G 50 40 Wheat Linseed cake, a 4 10 * When blossom is completely developed. To this Mr. Rham adds the following as equivalents of 100 pounds of " good hay :" — 102 Ibs. latter-math hay ; 88 Ibs. of clover hay made before the blossom expands ; 98 Ibs. of clover of second crop ; 98 Ibs. Lucerne hay ; 89 Ibs. sanfoin hay; 91 Ibs. tare hay; 146 Ibs. of clover after the seed; 410 Ibs. of green clover; 457 Ibs. of green vetches or tares; 541 Ibs. of cow cabbage leaves; 504 Ibs. turnips; 50 Ibs. vetches; 167 Ibs. of wheat, peas and oat chaff* No one will understand that because a certain weight of one product is a nutritive equivalent for a certain weight of another, that each will necessarily answer as a substitute for * Rev. W. Rham's statements are not made from his own experiments, but Mr. Spooner (from whom I borrow this column of the above table,) says they were trans- lated from the French by him, and are " the mean of the result of the experiments made by some of the most eminent agriculturists of Europe in the actual feeding of cattle." 236 PRODUCTS OF DIFFERENT FEEDS. the other in feeding. For example, taking the mean of the experimental results in the above table, 367f Ibs. of rye straw contain as much nutriment as 100 Ibs. of meadow hay. A Merino sheep weighing 90 pounds, daily consumes 3 pounds of hay : and to consume its equivalent in rye straw, it would have daily to masticate, digest, etc., a fraction over eleven pounds of it — a feat impracticable for a variety of reasons, and among others for the very obvious one that its stomachs could not be made to hold it, even though digestion should go on with twice its natural rapidity. The experiments made in feeding Saxon sheep in Silesia, by Reaumur, show in what manner the nutritive parts of certain ordinary vegetable products enter into the compo- sition of different animal products. KINDS OP FOOD. Increased live weight of animal. Produced wool. Ibs. oz. Produced tallow. Ibs. oz. Per cent, of nitrogen in such food 1,000 Ibs. raw potutocs with salt 1,000 " " " without salt 1,000 " raw mangel wurzel . 1,000 " peas 46^ 44 38 134 6 8%. 6 8 5 3« 14 11 12 5% 10 14% 6 5K 41 6 0.3(i 0.36 0.21 1 000 " wheat 155 13 13^ 59 9 2 09 1 000 " rye with salt 90 13 14>£ 35 11M 2 00 1,000 " rye without salt 1,000 " oats .. ; 83 146 12 10>i 9 12 33 8,^ 40 8 2.00 1 70 1 000 " barley 136 11 6^2 60 1 1 90 1 000 " buckwheat 120 10 4% 2 10 68 1 10 'a 12 14 1,000 " hay with straw, with- out other fodder 1,000 " whisky still grains or wash - 31 35 15 8 6 1 6 11 4 0 At first view, there is a degree of incongruity between the theoretical and practical results exhibited in the first of the above tables, which, without due reflection, might materially tend to impair our confidence in the accuracy of the tests which are relied on in agricultural chemistry. But a further glance discloses the fact that these results do not differ more widely from each other than those obtained by practical experiments. How are we to explain these latter incongrui- ties? If the results of actual experiments — experiments, too, conducted with care by men possessing unusual ability and means to do so understandingly and accurately — differ so widely, what then? Are we thence to conclude that experience is worth nothing, or that nature acts without any uniform laws ? — that every agricultural result, whether successful or unsuccessful, depends upon chance — or that fatality which is expressed in the delusive and detestable word "luck?" VALUE OF DIFFERENT FEEDS. 237 The explanation of such differences is, in truth, easy enough. The experiments were tried in different soils and seasons. Variations in the latter, every one kpows, highly affect the comparative nutritiousness of vegetable products. And unfortunately, too, the standard taken, hay, is the subject of special variations. To say nothing of the natural difference in the nutritiousness of the various kinds of grasses, which, when cut and cured, are termed "meadow hay," we know that the same kinds grown in a wet or diy season — cut a week earlier or a week later — cured rapidly in the sun, slowly in the cock, or slower still and with difficulty during wet, cloudy weather — vary very essentially in quality and nutriment. Take, for a single example, the main meadow grass of the northern portions of the United States, viz., timothy, (Phleum pratense.) According to the Woburn experiments,* 64 drachms of it green give, when cut and cured in the flower, 2 dr. 2 gr. ; in the seed, 5 dr. 3 gr. ; latter-math, 2 dr. Thus, a difference of two weeks in the time of making timothy hay might cause a difference of more than 100 per cent, in the amount of nutriment it contains ! f While it is unfortunate that no unvarying standard can be obtained, or fixed set of conditions agreed upon and observed, in the trial of this class of agricultural experiments, still there is quite as much accord in their results as we are accustomed to find in the opinions of sound, intelligent, practical farmers in regard to any of the experimental facts of farming, which they have been familiar with all their lives. We do not disregard the opinions of such men because they differ. And if we find them all pointing towards the same conclusion, we accept that conclusion as one beyond reasonable doubt. This is the light in which the statements contained in the Table of Nutritive Equivalents, on page 235, should be regarded. When, for example, scientific theory declares that clover hay, pound for pound, contains more nutriment than meadow hay, and when out of six careful and intelligent practical experi- ments, three also find it more nutritious, and the other three equally so, we are bound, as reasonable men, unless we have * Made some years since by Sinclair, on soils best adapted to each kind of grass, on the estate of the Duke of Bedford, at Woburn, England. t But to prevent mistakes let me add, that it makes no snch difference in the practical value of timothy as sheep fodder. In the seed it is a dry, tough, unpalatable feed for them— and no good sheep farmer intentionally cuts it in that state for his flocks. This, however, in no wise affects the particular fact under consideration. It is to be presumed that timothy composed no inconsiderable share of the meadow hay assumed as a standard by Block, Petri, Von Thaer, Boussinganlt, etc.— but in neither instance are we informed whether it was cut in the flower or in the seed. 238 COST AND ECONOMY OP DIFFERENT FEEDS. better proof to the contrary, to admit its equality and presume its superiority. When science and such an array of practice combine to pronounce peas and beans about equal with eacli other, and among the most nutritious of vegetable products, we ought to adopt that conclusion, if, indeed, we did not already know so notorious a fact. Accordingly, as few sheep farmers are able to make all these experiments for themselves in advance of trying them directly on the body of their flocks, all ought to see the expediency of a very careful study of such a table of Nutritive Equivalents as the preceding one. Reaumur's experiments, given on page 236, are also especially valuable : and it is only to be wished that their accuracy had also been tested by numerous other experiments directed to the same specific objects of inquiry. Still, I have great general confidence in them. Some of the facts he arrives at are very striking, as, for instance, the superiority of peas over every other vegetable substance named in his list, in the specific production of wool, while barley and wheat considerably exceed it, and oats nearly equal it, in the production of tallow. And a still more striking fact is found in the increase of wool and diminution of tallow produced by adding straw to "good hay" as a habitual food. If there is no mistake in this showing, it is a high point of policy in the wool grower to feed straw, and in the mutton grower to avoid feeding it. This brings me to another very important consideration, viz., the relative cost and general economy of the different kinds of feeds. According to Reaumur's Table, 1,000 pounds of peas produce 134 pounds live weight of carcass, 14 pounds 11 ounces of wool, and 41 pounds 6 ounces of tallow, while 1,000 pounds of mangel wurzel produce 38 pounds of live weight, 5 pounds 3^- ounces of wool, and 6 pounds 5^ ounces of tallow. Thus the latter produces between a third and a fourth as much live weight, a little more than a third as much wool, and nearly a seventh as much tallow. Peas weigh 60 Ibs. to the bushel. If we assume that mangel wurzels weigh the same,* four bushels of them will produce more live weight and weight of wool than one bushel of peas. Not being per- sonally familiar with the culture of mangel wurzel, I will, for the purposes of this illustration, substitute Swedish turnips * This is the statutory weight of a bushel of potatoes in New York,— but no weight is prescribed for other roots. I have never raised or weighed a bushel of mangel wurzels — but there cannot be difference enough between their weight and that of potatoes to make any material difference for the purposes of the comparison instituted in the text. EXPERIMENTS IN FEEDING SHEEP. 239 for them — which, by the united testimony of the experimenters given in the table of Nutritive Equivalents, contain more nutriment. Which is most cheaply produced, one bushel of peas or four bushels of Swedes ? An acre of ground is thought to do unusually well in the region where I reside,- that produces, one year with another, 25 bushels of peas. That acre does very poorly that does not produce 500 bushels of Swedes* — 20 bushels for one of peas. The difference in the cost of preparing the ground, cultivating the crop and harvesting, is considerable ; but it makes no approach to the difference in the product of nutriment. Oats compare equally unfavorably with turnips on the score of economy. I wish to show by such facts as the above, that the sheep farmer in determining what crops he will grow for the winter keep of his sheep, is not merely to estimate the relative value of feeds per pound, but to ascertain how he can provide the most nutriment suitable for sheep, at a given cost. Knowing the adaptation of his farm to the different products, and the cost to himself of producing each, every intelligent farmer can, better than anybody else for him, institute comparisons like the above, between all the products named in the preceding tables. The following records of experiments in feeding are from Mr. Robert Smith's essay " On the Management of Sheep," which received the prize of the Royal Agricultural Society of England, in 1847: "Experiment No. 1. — On the 20th of December, 1842, idght lambs were weighed and placed upon the regular turnip land, (a red loam, with cold subsoil,) to consume the turnips where they grew, and were regularly supplied with what cut Swedes they would eat, which proved to be on an average of 23^ pounds per day. They were again weighed on the 3d of April, 1843, being 15 weeks, and found to have gained, upon an average, during the time, 25 £ pounds each. " No. 2. — On the same day eight lambs were placed in a grass paddock, under the same regulations, and found to have consumed, on an average, 19 Ibs. of turnips per day, and gained, during the time, 26f Ibs. each. " No. 3. — On the same day, eight lambs were placed alongside the No. 2 lot in the grass paddock, and allowed to run in and out of an open shed during the day, but regularly shut up at night. They were allowed half a pound of mixed * I think my own crops have averaged at least 700 or 800 bushels to the acre, for a period of 15 years or more ; and one year they exceeded 1,100 bushels per acre. 240 EXPERIMENTS IN FEEDING SHEEP. oil cake and peas each per day, and consumed 20£ pounds of turnips per day, and gained 33^ pounds each. " No. 4. — On the same day, eight lambs were placed with the Nos. 2 and 3 lots in the grass paddock, under the same regulations as No. 3, but supplied with one pound of mixed corn* per day. They consumed 20 pounds of turnips per day, during the following ten weeks, being again weighed on the 28th of February, 1843, and gained, on an average, 26-£ pounds each. "No. 5. — Eight lambs were also placed in a warm paddock, with a shed to run under during the day, but were shut up at least 18 hours, and fed upon l£ Ibs. of mixed corn per day, and consumed 18£ Ibs. of turnips per day. They were again weighed at the same time as No. 4, and found to have gained 33 £ pounds each during the ten weeks. "No 6. — On the 5th of January, 1843, sixteen shearlings were equally divided, and eight placed upon a grass paddock, and allowed one pound of mixed corn each per day. They consumed 24 pounds of Swedish turnips each lot per day. They were again Aveighed on the 2d of March, being eight weeks, and were found to. have gained 21^ pounds each. " No. 7. — On the same day the other eight shearlings were placed alongside the No. 6 in the grass paddock, and allowed one pound of mixed corn each, and consumed 20^ pounds of turnips per day. They were allowed an open shed to run under during the day, and regularly shut in at nights — and again weighed at the same time as No. 6, and were found to have gained 24 pounds each during the eight weeks. " No. 8. — On the third of April, the eight lambs (No. 3,) having been weighed, were placed upon young clover, and supplied with half a pound of mixed corn, as before. They consumed 12 Ibs. of turnips per day during the following month. Being again weighed on the 1st of May, they were found to have gained llf Ibs. each. They had a shed to run under during the day, and were shut up at night. "No. 9.— On the 29th of May, the eight lambs (No. 8,) were again weighed, having been allowed, as before, half a pound of mixed corn upon the clover, but no turnips, with a shed to run under at will. They were found to have gained 16 Ibs. each during the month. * Wherever the word "corrf" occurs in this record of experiments, it is to be understood in its general sense of grain' and the mixed grain, referred to by Mr. Smith, did not even include Indian corn — that not being one of the grain crops of England. EXPERIMENTS IN FEEDING SHEEP. 241 " To prove the temperature of the animal body during the hot weather, I placed the two lots of shearlings, No. 6 and No. 7, upon moderate clover on the 1st of July, 1843. "No. 10. — The eight shearlings, (No. 6,) were weighed, and allowed one pint of peas per day, and again weighed at the the end of 21 days, and were found to have gained 9£ Ibs. each. "No. 11.— The eight shearlings, (No. 7,) were also weighed, and given one pint of old beans per day, and again weighed at the same time, and were found to have gained 6 Ibs. each, the peas appearing most suitable to the animal temperature during the hot weather, and the beans far too hot. What is more important, those sheep fed upon beans were getting full of humors in this short space of time, while those fed upon peas were looking exceedingly healthy. "In the autumn of 1843, after making the above experi- ments, I determined upon testing the qualities of the various vegetables open to our use at that season of the year. On the 2d of October, 1843, thirty lambs were equally divided into lots of ten each, and placed upon over-eaten seeds. They were all weighed, and the roots regularly given them by an experienced shepherd. "No. 12. — Ten lambs, fed upon cut white turnips, were again weighed on the 13th of November, and were found to have gained, upon an average, 11 Ibs. each. " No. 13. — Ten lambs, fed upon cut Swedes, gained during the six weeks, upon an average, 11 Ibs. each. "No. 14. — Ten lambs fed upon cut cabbage, gained during the time, 16^- pounds each, showing, as I fully expected, a preference in favor of cabbage ; but, to my equal surprise, a great difference in favor of the white turnip over the Swede. By subsequent experiments I found, as the cold weather advanced, the cabbage and white turnip became of less value, and that the Swede improved. " In the autumn of 1844, having placed my ram lambs in their winter quarters, and observing that those placed upon cole-seed were going on apparently the best, I determined to weigh a part of them in comparison with those placed in pens upon grass land ; consequently, on the 14th of October, 1844, the following lots were weighed, as in previous experiments, the ten upon the cole-seed being selected from 24 others, marked, and again placed with them: "No. 15. — Ten lambs penned upon cole-seed,* with cut * A species of cabbage. 11 242 EXPERIMENTS IK FEEDING SHEEP. clover chaff, were again weighed at the end of one month, and found to have gained 12^- pounds each. "No. 16. — Ten lambs penned upon drum-head cabbage, with cut clover chaff, and weighed as above; they gamed 10£ pounds each. "No. 17. — Ten lambs placed upon grass and fed upon cut Swedes and cabbage, of equal quantities, with clover chaff, gained 9f Ibs. each. "No. 18. — Ten lambs placed upon grass and fed upon cut white turnips and cabbage, of equal quantities, with clover chaff, gained 11 Ibs. each. " Having frequently given my lambs carrots during the winter and spring months, and to no apparent advantage, when compared with other roots, I determined to test their qualities after the expiration of the above experiments, and the No. 16 lot were supplied with what Swedes they would eat, and the No. 17 lot with carrots. "No. 19. — Ten lambs, fed upon cut Swedes and clover- chaff, having been weighed at the end of the other experi- ment, were again weighed on the 9th of December. They were found to have gamed during the month 10 Ibs. each, and consumed 22 Ibs. of turnips per day. "No. 20. — Ten lambs fed upon cut carrots and clover- chaff, were weighed as above on the 9th of December, and were found to have gained 9£ Ibs. each, and consumed 22^ Ibs. of carrots per day. ''Thus proving that the carrot can not be given to sheep with equal profit, when compared with the Swede turnip, the carrot being more expensive and hazardous in its cultivation, and producing rather less animal food from a given weight at this season of the year." I shall place a further list of English experiments in winter feeds in the appendix of this volume. * Turnips are not adapted either to the soil or circumstances of all parts of our country where sheep are kept. I have been informed by many of the farmers in those regions of Vermont where the best sheep are raised, that this crop does not flourish on their farms, f And it would be folly to bring turnips into competition with Indian corn, as a habitual winter feed, in our Western States, where the latter crop can be raised for * See APPENDIX C. t I raised this question once in the presence of a number of the leading sheep breeders of Addison county — the first sheep breeding county in the State — and they without an exception concurred in the opinion stated in the text. MIXED FEEDS FOB SHEEP. 243 ten or fifteen cents a bushel. But I know of no cheaper feed, except the last ; and that does not approach turnips in cheapness, on lands equally suited to their respective produc- tion in the Middle or Eastern States. In all the latter situations — even in those interior regions where the price of hay has hitherto averaged less than $8 a tun — it is more economical to feed turnips with hay and straw, than it is to feed hay alone. I have established that fact to my own satisfaction by the experience of many years. The beet is not included in the above English experiments, and I have never used it as sheep feed myself. Mr. Chamber- lain brought a variety of it with his sheep from Silesia, and is satisfied of the economy and high utility of the crop — but has not, so far as I am informed, tested it in comparison with turnips. My friend, Hon. George Geddes, of Fairmount, New York, has cultivated the same kind of beets, and also turnips, for sheep feed. On his soils (among the best in the State) he, thus far, gives preference to the beet. He has not instituted any comparisons between them by weighing respectively feed and product — but as a farmer who has no superior in our country in both the theory and practice of his occupation, his observations, although unaided by such tests, are entitled to very great weight. Carrots have failed as sheep feed in this country, for the same reasons assigned by Mr. Robert Smith for their failure in England. Rape is cultivated by a few of our growers of English sheep, and is thought highly of by them. Tares and cole seed are unknown to the great body of our sheep farmers, and I am not aware that common cabbage is cultivated by any of them as a field crop for sheep. MIXED FEEDS. — In making up mixed feeds for sheep, composed of the different products which are found most available and economical, care should be taken to keep the proportion of nutriment to bulk such that a proper supply of the former can be taken into the stomach, without oppressing that organ. It has been seen that 3£ per cent, of the live weight per diem in hay, about meets the demands of the animal economy; and it probably also about fills the stomach to a comfortable state of fullness. If then a sheep weighing 90 Ibs. received half its nutriment in hay and half in the better kinds of straw (which contain half as much nutriment as hay,) it would be required to consume 1|- Ibs. of hay and 3 Ibs. of straw daily — an aggregate of 4£ M>s., which, I think, could not be 244 MIXED FEEDS FOB SHEEP. daily taken into and digested in the stomach of a sheep of that size. Therefore, to put sheep on half straw feed, it is necessary that some other portion of their feed be more concentrated, or more nutritious in proportion to bulk than hay — as, for example, grain or roots — or else they will not get their proper supply of nutriment. My own course, when feeding straw, has been to give a feed of hay at morning and evening, (intended to average about a pound per head each time,) all the straw the sheep will eat and about a pound of cut turnips each, at noon — the latter being a little increased if the hay and straw are not of prime quality. But I do not often give over two bushels, or 120 Ibs. of turnips, to a hundred. Hay here does not average $8 a ton ; and though I regard feeding turnips as economical, my major object in growing and feeding them is to promote the health and thrift of my breeding ewes, and the growth of my lambs. Some excellent sheep farmers on grain and clover -seed farms lying a few miles north of me — where a contiguous city market raises the average price of hay about 50 per cent, higher than here — give their store sheep no hay until March, feeding them in lieu of it, bright, good straw in abundance, clover chaff,* and a daily feed of Indian corn ranging from one and a half to two gills per head, according to their size and to other circumstances. The straw and grain chaff are generally fed fresh from the thrashing floor half a dozen times a day, and the sheep are not required to eat it at all close. After the first of March a full supply of bright clover hay is given and the grain feed taken oft'. The sheep, as I have had repeated occasion to observe, winter well, and the breeding ewes raise good lambs. I do not believe that breeding ewes or lambs could properly be fed enough straw and turnips — particularly if the straw was dry and ripe — to obtain the equivalent of a full supply of hay. If turnips are fed in excess, they render the evacuations too thin and active for severely cold weather. But a pound a head given to straw-fed sheep with a little diminution of the corn otherwise requisite, would, I think, constitute a better and cheaper feed than entire corn and straw. The comparative nutriment of the different kinds of straw has been given in the table on page 235. Oat and barley * That is, what is left of clover after thrashing or hulling — a black, unpromising looking mass. FATTENING SHEEP IN WINTEIt. 245 straw cut quite green and cured bright, are highly relished by sheep. I had rather have them (particularly if thrashed with a flail so that a few small green kernels remain in the ends of the heads,) than hay in the situation in which it is frequently cured for use. Wheat straw ranks next, among the common varieties of straw. Sheep do not relish it, and will not eat it very well if they get any hay. But when confined to it and grain, they learn to eat it and thrive on it. They must not, however, be compelled to eat it as close as oat and barley straw. Ripe rye straw, unless cut fine and mixed with meal, is a dry, harsh, unprofitable and wholly unacceptable food to sheep. All straws are eaten much better by them when fresh thrashed and fed frequently in small quantities. Corn-stalks are contained in neither of the preceding tables of nutrition. When cut and cured bright, before frost, no feed is better relished by sheep than the leaves and some finer portions of the stalks : and they thrive admirably on them. Pea-haulm, if cut and cured green, is highly valuable and is highly relished by sheep ; but when not harvested until dried up and dead — according to the more common mode — it is utterly worthless for them. In seasons of great scarcity of hay and straw, sheep have been repeatedly and successfully wintered by feeding them almost exclusively on grain. Such a " hay-famine " occurred in the best sheep region of Vermont, in the winter of 1860-61, occasioned by a severe drouth the preceding summer. Flock- masters who were determined to keep well at all hazards, fed their sheep a pound (or quart) of oats per head, with such quantities of hay, straw, etc., as they could obtain. In better Indian corn growing regions, a pound of corn a day is given under like circumstances. FATTENING SHEEP IN WINTER. — The present ordinary mode of fattening sheep in winter in New York, is thus described in a letter to me from John Johnston, Esq., of Geneva, New York, who is one of the oldest and most experienced feeders, as well as grain farmers in the United States : " I generally buy my sheep in October. Then I have good pasture to put them on, and they gain a good deal before Avinter sets in. I have generally had to put them in the yards about the first of December. For the last 23 years I have fed straw the first two or two and a half months, a pound of oil cake, meal or grain to each sheep. When I commence 246 REGULARITY IN FEEDING. feeding hay, if it is good, early cut clover, I generally reduce the quantity of meal or grain one-half; but that depends on the condition of the sheep. If they are not pretty fat, I continue the full feed of meal or grain with their clover, and on both they fatten wonderfully fast. This year (1862-3) I fed buckwheat, a pound to each per day, half in the morning and half at 4 o'clock P. M., with wheat and barley straw. I found the sheep gained a little over a pound each per week. It never was profitable for me to commence fattening lean sheep, or very fat ones. Sheep should be tolerably fair mutton when yarded. I keep their yards and sheds thoroughly littered with straw. " Last year I only fed straw one month. The sheep were fed a pound of buckwheat each. From the 20th of October to the 1st of March, they gained nearly l£ pounds each per week. They were full-blood Merinos — but not those with the large cravats around their necks. I have fed sheep for the eastern markets for more than 30 years, and I always made a profit on them except in 1841-2. I then fed at a loss. It was a tight squeeze in 1860-1 to get their dung for profit. Some years I have made largely. I did so this year, (1862-3,) and if I had held on two weeks longer I should have made much more. Taking all together it has been a good business for me." Mr. Johnston by under-draining* and by the manure obtained by fattening sheep, has almost created one of the finest farms in New York. I think his land is not adapted to turnips. REGULARITY IN FEEDING. — The utmost regularity should be observed in the times of feeding either store or fattening sheep, and in giving them just the requisite amount to last them until the next feeding. If permitted to waste hay, they rapidly acquire the habit of doing so — i. e., picking out the best and then waiting, even though quite hungry, for another feed. If the hay is coarse and was cut over-ripe, and especially if clover hay be thus circumstanced, it is not profitable to compel the sheep to eat all the orts or refuse ; but even with such hay, sheep can soon be taught by over- feeding and carelessness, to make a most unnecessary degree of waste. All experienced flock-masters concur in the opinion that * He is the father of underground tile-draining in the United States. REGULARITY IN FEEDING — SALT. 247 sheep fed with perfect regularity as to time and amount (making proper allowance for the weather,) will do better on rather inferior keep, than on the best without that regularity. I prefer feeeding three times a day even in the shortest days of winter ; but many good flock - masters feed but twice. If fed three times, it should be at sunrise, noon, and an hour before dark ; if but twice, the last feeding should be an hour earlier. Sheep do not stand at their racks and eat well in the dark. It is not very important at what period of the day grain or roots are given provided the time is uniform. SALT. — Salt is not perhaps quite as necessary to the health of sheep in winter as in summer, but still all good shepherds regard it as indispensable. It should be fed as often as once a week, in the feeding troughs, or by brining a quantity of hay or straw. The Vermont breeders almost universally keep it standing constantly before their sheep in boxes placed in the sheep- houses. My friend Gen. Otto F. Marshall, of Steuben County, New York, has an excellent and economical mode of feeding it. The orts when taken from the sheep racks are thrown into a box -rack wider and considerably higher than the common ones, and placed under a shed. The orts are sprinkled with brine, and the sheep when hungry for salt go to the ort rack and consume them. Thus all the hay is saved. CHAPTER XXI. PEAIEIE SHEEP HTJSBANDEY. PRAIRIE MANAGEMENT IN SUMMER LAMBING — FOLDS AND DOGS STABLES HERDING WASHING SHEARING STORING AND SELLING WOOL TICKS PRAIRIE DISEASES SALT WEANING LAMBS PRAIRIE MANAGEMENT IN WINTER WINTER FEED SHEDS OR STABLES WATER LOCATION OF SHEEP ESTABLISHMENT. THE growing of sheep is rapidly increasing in nearly all the new States of the Union west of the Mississippi, and in those which lie on its east bank north of the Ohio.* In all these States are immense tracts of natural pasturage, usually lying in the form of level or rolling prairies — but occasionally in broken tracts containing hills of considerable elevation. The grasses which grow on them are invariably found to be well adapted to the support of domestic animals. It has already been ascertained by direct experiment that flocks of sheep will obtain their support throughout the entire year, from these natural pastures, as far north as 33 deg. in Central and Western Texas. Ascending north on the banks of the Mississippi, the necessity for artificial winter feed gradually increases until in latitude 40 deg. — about the range of St. Joseph in Missouri, and Springfield in Illinois — it is required through six months of the year. But the domestic grasses will flourish a month longer there, so that the period of dry foddering is restricted to about five months. Ascending north from Texas on the coast of the Pacific, the temperature decreases less rapidly. The variation of the isothermal line (the line of equal mean heat) on the shores of that ocean and of the Mississippi river, has been popularly claimed to equal ten degrees. While there are yet few settled data to enable us to draw definite general' conclusions on the * For Census of sheep and products of wool in all the States and Territories anterior to 18(53, see APPENDIX D. TEMPERATURE OP PRAIRIE STATES. 249 subject, the thermometrical observations already taken do not authorize the conclusion that the difference is so great. I have picked out the following examples of the annual mean heat at such points in Texas, on the Mississippi, and on the Pacific, as came nearest to the regions I wished to compare in this particular, from the multifarious tables contained in the Report of "The Results of Meteorological Observations made under the direction of the United States Patent Office and the Smithsonian Institution from 1854 to 1859 inclusive."* Latitude. 1854. 1855. 1856. 1857. 1858. 1859. New Braunfols,t Texas, 29°.42/ 64.61 68.85 70.07 Austin, Texas, 30.20 64.43 65.84 64.64 65.85 67.53 68.08 San Francisco, California, 38.00 55.28 57.43 56.23 Sacramento, California, 38.34 59.51 60.03 60.01 59.58 58.74 St. Louis, Missouri, 38.37 58.37 53.42 53.42 56.69 55.45 Ottawa, Illinois, 41.20 51.69 48.94 48.15 45.88 49.01 48.37 It will be observed that while the mean heat of St. Louis and Sacramento, in almost identically the same latitude, varies, on the average, 4.22 degrees, there is a much greater propor- tionable difference in the mean heat of Sacramento and Ottawa, which for six years averages 11.02 deg. J These facts render it obvious that the seasons of pasturage must be materially longer on our Pacific coast, than in corresponding latitudes on the Mississippi. In all the newer States there are lands covered by natural pastures which are exceedingly cheap. In most of them it can be purchased in any quantities for $1.25 an acre. In the older prairie States, like Illinois, Missouri and Wisconsin, desirable tracts would cost considerably more — but still very greatly less than grazing lands of half their fertility in the old North and North-eastern States. But, in reality, it is not necessary for the wool grower now, nor will it be for many years to come — in most of the above States — either to own or pay rent on a great proportion of the lands depastured by his sheep. We have no redundant popu- lation ready to take up with lands which are destitute of any of the essential requisites demanded by the settler. The comparative lack of wood and of running water in the in- terior of these vast western plains, prevents them from being * Published by order of the Senate, 1861. t New Braunfels is about twenty-five miles by a direct line north-east of San Antonio, and lies on the southern border of the sheep growing region proper, of Western Texas. It was rather the head-quarters of Mr. G. W. Kendall's difl'erent Sheep establishments. % To facilitate other comparisons I will here give the mean temperature of several Of the points named in the table :— Austin, 66.39 mean of 6 years ; Sacramento, 59.09 jiean of 6 years ; St. Louis, 55.47 mean of 5 years ; Ottawa, 48.67 mean of 6 years. 11* 250 COST OF KEEPING ON PRAIKIES. gettled, except on the edges and on water courses ; and all the Bheep farmer needs in such situations is sufficient land for his buildings, grain fields, and, — as his wealth and conveniences increase — for pastures of artificial grass for the early spring and late fall feed of his sheep. When the banks of the streams and the clumps of wood-land are occupied by settlers, they, in effect, have the permanent control of the interior pasturage, often many miles in extent. I have been informed of instances in Texas where an individual, or a small party of individuals, have bought a narrow strip on each bank of a river for a number of miles, and thus prevented the sale of and actually threw out of market hundreds of thousands of acres which were by this means cut off from all access to water, without traveling, perhaps for miles, to the next river bank. But, in truth, the vast extent of our Prairie lands defies all attempts at monopoly. Even in a State comparatively as old as Illinois — containing at the last census a population of over one million seven hundred thousand persons, and probably now containing 50,000 sheep* — immense tracts of land, owned in part by the Government, but principally by non- resident owners, (" speculators,") lie open and free to the use of all ; and there is now actually a class of nomadic shepherds in that State who keep flocks of sheep, sometimes numbering upward of two thousand each, who, in the words of the dying Son of the Mist, " Take no hire — give no stipend — build no hut — inclose no pasture — sow no grain." These men are generally industrious Germans, who, after serving flock- masters as shepherds for a year or two, invested their earnings in enough sheep to commence flocks of their own. They follow their sheep by day over the prairies, herding them in little temporary inclosures at night to protect them from wolves and dogs. In the fall they buy a field of corn, drive their sheep to it for the winter, and in the spring resume their wanderings. In all the new Western States, sheep have been found to acclimate without the least difficulty, f In Texas in the extreme South, in Minnesota in the extreme North, in Cali- fornia in the extreme West, and in every intermediate region where they have been introduced, sheep remain signally healthy, thrive to the highest degree, produce as much wool * By the United States Census of 1860, there were then 33,822 sheep in Illinois and they have increased much more rapidly than ever before, since that period. t For a letter showing how sheep are got into the new States — how a sheep establishment is started — and how the first winter is got over, see APPENDIX E. PROFITS OF. SHEEP ON THE PKAIRIES. 251 per head if as well fed, as in the old Eastern States, and the wool is not deteriorated in any apparent or real quality. It can require no formal array of facts to show that the profits of sheep husbandry on the prairies must greatly exceed those obtained in States lying further east, where the land is no better and costs from five to fifty times as much. It seems now also to be a conceded fact that the profits of sheep production decidedly exceed those of horse, cattle, or swine production on the prairies. The surplus wheat and Indian corn of the West finds its market on the eastern sea-board. It generally costs half of the crop of wheat, and from five-sixths to six-sevenths of the crop of corn to transport the remainder to New York by rail in the winter, from regions lying no further west than the east bank of the Mississippi. It costs less than two cents a pound to transport wool, which, at the average prices of wool for thirty-five years preceding the present war, is less than two forty-seconds of the value of the medium, and two thirty- fifths of the value of the coarse article. By the Mississippi, or by the northern river, lake and canal navigation which is avail- able in summer, the transportation of the heavy, bulky Western products is considerably less. But when a pound of wool is worth on the farm about as much as four bushels of corn, and when that amount of corn is more than fifty times as bulky, and two hundred and twenty-four times as heavy* as a pound of wool, there must, under any circumstances, remain an insuperable obstacle to the comparative profitableness of corn as a marketable product — and indeed of all other bulky and heavy products, f * In some of the States the weight of corn is established at 56 Ibs., in others, 58 Ibs. per bushel. t Since the above was in the hands of the publisher, the articles on sheep, in the Report of the Commissioner of Agriculture, have fallen under my eye, and I find the following statements in an article on " Sheep on the Prairies," by Hon. J. B. Grinnell, of Grinnell, Iowa: — "At any point two hundred miles from Chicago this ratio of cost in freighting is well established ; that to transport your products to the seaboard, on , . . gross on wool 4 per cent. This is not conjecture, but my own experience, that I give 80 per cent, of the value of my wheat which impoverishes my farm, to find a market ; and 4 per cent, to find the best wool market, the production of which enriches my wheat you pay 80 per cent, of its value ; on pork 30 per cent.; on beef 20 per cent.; wool 4 per cent. This is not conjecture, per acres beyond computation." The following statements occur in a paper entitled "Sheep Husbandy in the West," by Samuel Boardman, of Lincoln, Logan county, Illinois :—" With wheat worth sixty-five cents per bushel, it costs one bushel to send another from Central Illinois to market. With corn at ten cents per bushel, it takes over six bushels to carry the one to New York. It costs one cent and two-thirds of a cent to send a pound of wool to New York ; less than two cents will carry fifty cents' worth of wool to market ; to carry fifty cents' worth of corn costs about three dollars. In my own case, I could haul my wool to New York in less time than I could haul the corn I feed to my sheep in the winter six miles to the railroad, and I could also haul the wool to New York cheaper than I could ship the corn by rail. Even in this State, with its 252 PRAIRIE MANAGEMENT IN SUMMER. Prairie sheep husbandry has the same general features everywhere, in the summer. In the winter there are essential differences in its operations in regions of perennial verdure, like Western Texas, and in those of six or seven months verdure, like Central Illinois, Northern Missouri and Kansas. I shall proceed briefly to describe the proper summer manage- ment in all these regions, and the different systems of winter management in the North and South. It will not be necessary to enter upon details, except when the management differs from that of the older regions already described in this work. PRAIRIE MANAGEMENT IN SUMMER. — In latitude 40 deg., in the basin of the Mississippi — the latitude of Central Illinois and Northern Missouri — sheep can generally find subsistence on the prairies after about the middle of April. As soon as the new grass sprouts in the smallest degree, the immense range supplies them with food. LAMBING. — Lambs in the last named regions, where they are, as it is termed, " raised on the range," — i. e., where the ewes are kept on the open prairie during the lambing season — are not allowed to commence coming before the 1st of May, when the feed is expected to be abundant, and the danger of cold storms greatly over. Lambing on the range, however, is at best attended with great labor and care to the his charge. _ ewes is a hich compel their being turned out on the prairies to lamb — the want of suitable inclosures seeded to domestic grasses — also prevents any division of flocks. When from thirty to fifty lambs are dropped a day, it is a matter of difficulty to get the younger and weaker ones to the folds within the proper time at night, or on the appearance of a storm, without separating them from their dams. When such separation takes place, near nightfall, and twenty or thirty ewes are then running through the flock bleating distractedly for their young, it produces a scene of wild confusion ; lambs are run over and trampled on ; the ewes, in the increasing darkness, do not find their lambs ; more than three thousand miles of railroad, wool-growing is more profitable than wheat and corn, onr great items of export. How much more, then, is it in the great portion of the North-west, which does not now, and may not for many years, possess the questionable advantages of railroads with which to market wheat or corn in the raw state ?" LAMBING FOLDS STABLES. 253 if new dropped and not well filled with milk, the latter are liable to perish before morning in cold weather ; and when morning comes some of the ewes, particularly young ones, never again recognize their lambs. The small portable pens recommended at page 159, would not be available here, because they would not keep out the wolf. All folding pens on the prairies require to be five or six feet high for that purpose. I am not aware that it has been tried, but I am well satisfied that three or four, or half a dozen temporary pens, according to the size of the flock, put up on different parts of the range, each of which would conveniently hold half a dozen sheep, and into which the shepherd should be getting the youngest lambs and their dams some time befose nightfall, would amply pay for themselves in one stormy lambing season — while they might be made to last through a man's life. * FOLDS AND DOGS. — A permanent fold for the night, unless a good sheltered one, affords so few advantages and produces so many disadvantages, that it is highly desirable to dispense with it at all times, and particularly in lambing time, if any other way can be found to guard the flock from wolves and dogs. This is effectually done in other countries by means of suitable breeds of sheep dogs. The immense utility of introducing some of these varieties into our prairie States, and changing the system of folding, would seem to be obvious. Some information on this subject will be offered in the Chapter on Dogs. STABLES. — But by far the best place for lambing, in northern prairie climates, is an inclosed field of domestic grass, immediately about sheltered close sheds or stables, which can be used as occasion requires. A large flock ought, for obvious reasons, if it is rendered practicable by the number of the fields, to be divided into smaller flocks — or * It would be best to make them with materials prepared and kept for tha express purpose. I should think it would be very convenient to construct them o four lengths, or panels of light, strong fence, capable of being put together withou nails. Ten or twelve feet boards might be inserted in mortices or grooves in corne posts, the upper and lower boards being fastened in them by movable pins. Tl: corner posts of these lengths might be fastened together by hooks and staples. Tin four lengths would form a pen of 10 or 12 feet square. This could be covered as far ; desirable — a great improvement for inclement weather — by boards two feet longc than the side boards. This would form a pen which could be set up, or takon in pieces and loaded in a cart, by tw4 67 101 Louisiana 109 897 296187 2l'&43 Maine 1,364 034 Maryland, 477,438 491 511 1 135 Massachusetts, ........... . ...... . 585,136 377 267 8616 Michigan, 2,043,283 4 062 858 47 916 Minnesota, . . .... 85 22740 2473 Mississippi, 559,619 ]|M3 Missouri . . 1,627,164 New Hampshire, 1 108 476 New Jersey, , 375,396 349,250 12093 New York, 10,071,301 9 454 473 3065 North Carolina, .. ....... 970,738 883473 77 296 Ohio .. .... ... 10 196 371 ' 29 686 4,481,570 4 752 523 53 1J25 Rhode Island, 129,692 90699 5455 South Carolina, . 487 233 427 102 1 364 378 Texas 131 917 Vermont, 3,400,717 2,975,544 18,015 Virginia, 2,860,765 253,963 2,509,443 1,011,915 112,591 11,885 Total States, 52,474,311 59,932,328 TERRITORIES. Columbia District of 625 Dakota, Nebraska, 3312 62 New Mexico, 32901 142110 Utah,.. 9222 4*325 Washington, Total Territories, 42,648 679,015 Aggregate, 52,516,959 60,511,343 -wopsr I give these figures for what they are worth. It will be seen that the number of sheep reported hi 1860 bears no correspondence whatever with the product of wool the same year. It assuredly required over twelve millions of sheep, taken as they average, to produce sixty million pounds of wool ; and then the lambs of the year, not sheared, would at least equal six millions more. I have no doubt there were twenty millions of sheep in the United States in 1860, and probably the present number equals twenty-five millions. APPENDIX E. 427 APPENDIX E — (Page 250.) STAETING- A SHEEP ESTABLISHMENT IN THE NEW WESTERN STATES. THE following letter is from an intelligent gentleman residing in Essex County, New York, whom I knew a few years since as a highly respectable member of the New York Legislature : CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, May 1, 1863. HON. H. S. RANDALL— Dear Sir: Yours dated April 20th came duly to hand. I should have replied at once, but have not had a spare moment for the last four weeks, as my sheep have required my undivided attention. I am here on business for a day, and will take time to give you a few facts as far as my experience is concerned. About the 20th of last July I started from Calhoun County, Michigan, with two droves of sheep, about 1,700 in each drove. My destination was Southern Minnesota. In consequence of the Indian outbreak in that section of country, I changed my plan and stopped in Northern Iowa, about twenty miles west of McGregor, on the old military road to Forts Crawford and Atkinson. My sheep stood driving remarkably well, and arrived at that point about the 10th of September. I found good feed, and by the time winter set in my sheep were in fine order. I sold about 300 in the autumn, thinking I would winter the remainder. I then set about preparing whiter quarters for 3,000 sheep. I did not erect my sheds at one place, (on account of the inconvenience of hauling the feed I had purchased to one place,) but about two miles apart, where water was convenient. I succeeded in getting a grove, at each place, and built my sheds fronting the grove and parallel with each other, about 500 feet long. I built them of poles and posts from the groves, and covered them with straw. The front posts were about six feet above ground and the back ones about four. I employed Irishmen that were in the habit of using the spade and covered the back side with dirt, and then covered this smoothly with sod, which made them very warm — being left open in front, this was important. I then cut the sheds up with board fences about 22 feet apart, commencing under the shed and running out about 50 feet in front, making yard and shelter for about 50 sheep. I forgot to mention the width of the sheds, which was 13 feet. I then sorted my sheep, putting heavy wethers by themselves, heavy ewes by themselves, &c. ; in short, I went through the flock grading them according to strength and sex. I started with prepared winter quarters for 3,000, but continued to sell some through the early part of winter. By the 1st of January I had reduced my flock to 2,200. After that I declined selling more. I will now give you a brief account of my feeding, its quantity, quality, &c. I procured what hay I conveniently could, about half of which was nice timothy. I expected to buy from time to time during the winter, which I have been able to do at fair rates, say from $3 to $4 per ton. I would quite as soon have good upland prairie hay as timothy, provided it is cut early. The sheep will eat it better. I also bought what corn I could in the field, paying from $4 to $7 per acre. 428 APPENDIX F. This I cut while the fodder was green, before frost, shocking it in the field and drawing in after the ground froze. This I found excellent feed. I fed it once a day, usually at noon. After that was used up I fed corn hi the ear to all except my yearling lambs. The latter I fed a mixture of shelled corn, oats and shorts from the mill, mixing it as follows : — J corn, J oats, | shorts. I gave a pen of 50 lambs one-half bushel once a day (at 11 o'clock.) This, with what hay they could eat, made them prosper finely. I fed hay to all my sheep twice a day ; but the lambs generally got it three times. My sheep have been remarkably healthy. Of course one dies occasionally, but I have got them Well through the winter. I have just finished tagging. On coming to handle them, we find them very heavy. A large number are good mutton. Since putting up my sheep last fall, I have lost less than one per cent, of 630 lambs that I went into winter with. Only one has died. I think the feed I have used for lambs can't be bettered. My sheep are about two-thirds ewes. I can't give any definite idea of how many lambs I shall have, as I did not put my bucks in with my ewes until the first of December. I was unfortunate enough in the autumn to have a native buck get in with my flock once in a while, and the result has been that I have had about ninety lambs during the winter, scattered along. I had from the ninety ewes eighty- four good healthy lambs. I should, however, have had but very few of the lambs living, coming as they did, had it not been for the care of my yard-master. A lamb will chill in one hour in cold weather if not taken to the fire to dry, which is found necessary in most cases. I am satisfied that Iowa and Southern Minnesota are especially adapted to wool growing. The country where I am keeping my sheep is somewhat uneven and rolling, and a good farming country. The country seems prosperous. Improved farms are selling from $15 to $20 per acre, and unimproved lands from $3 to $10 per acre. I am sorry that I am obliged to give you such a hurried statement of my experience with sheep hi the West. Any farther inquiries you may be pleased to make, I shall be happy to answer. Yours truly, R. A. LOVELASTD. APPENDIX F — (page 257.) CLIMATE OF TEXAS. THE following account of some of the peculiarities of the climate of Texas, of the seasons and crops and their vicissitudes, I extract from articles on the Climatology of that State, contributed to the Texas Almanacs of 1860 and 1861, by Professor Caleb G. Forshey, Superinten- dent of the Military Institute, in Fayette County : APPENDIX F. 429 TEXAS NOETHEBS. Number and Duration. — 1. During seven or eight months of every year, Texas is liable to a class of storms, or winds, styled " northers, from the direction from which they come. 2. In the year 1857, there were twenty-six northers experienced &t the Texas Military Institute, in Fayette county. Of these some two or three were gentle or baffled northers. They occupied fifty-seven days, having an average of two and one-fifth days in length. The latest in spring, was May 16, and earliest in autumn, was Nov. 7. 3. In the year 1858, there were thirty-seven northers, about thirty- three of which might be classed as well marked, the others being either gentle or baffled northers. These occupied seventy-eight days. The latest in spring, was May 9, and the earliest in autumn, was Oct. 7. 4. In the first half of 1859, there have been twenty-four northers, of which four may be described as gentle or baffled northers. They have occupied forty-seven days in their transit, and the latest was May 24. 5. It is proper to remark that nearly all the northers of May and October are mild, and rarely do much damage, or produce so low a temperature as to be severely felt. All the other months, November to April inclusive, are liable to northers of considerable severity. 6. It appears then, that in thirty months last past, of which eighteen months are liable to distinct northers, we have experienced eighty northers, not including the feeble ones of May and October. The same period has seventy-seven weeks, very nearly affirming the hypothesis of weekly returns of the norther. An inspection of the table shows a large number of punctual weekly recurrences of this meteor. 7. At this place of observation their duration varies from one to four days. Area and Boundaries of NortTier. — 8. The region over which this peculiar storm has its sweep, is not very great, though its precise limits can not be defined. By diligent inquiry from persons of great experi- ence, we submit the following limits: 9. On the north, by the valley of Red river, in the Indian Territory; on the east, by the second tier of counties from the east boundary of Texas, near meridian 95°, south to the Trinity and thence south-east to the mouth of the Sabine. On the south they are felt across the Gulf, to the coast of South-Mexico and Yucatan. On the west they are bounded by the Sierra Madre, up to the mouth of the Pecos, and thence by about the 101st meridian to the sources of Red river. 10. Within this area, there are various degrees of violence, having their axis of intensity between meridians 97 and 98, and increasing in force and duration, the further south. At Red river, on this line, they are usually limited to a day or two ; whereas at Corpus Christ! and Matamoras, one norther often continues till the next supersedes it; and at Vera Cruz, a twenty-days norther is not remarkable. West of Fort Belknap, to the Pecos, the northers grow feebler and rarer. North of Red river, on the route from Fort Washita to Fort Smith, they are rarely felt. On the east margin they are much modified by the forests of the timbered region. At all points, an open prairie increases their vigor. 430 APPENDIX F. Forces and other Phenomena. — 11. The norther usually commences with a violence nearly equal to its greatest force, if its initial point be near the observer. If it has traveled some distance, it will be warmed up, and moderated in its violence, at first attack. Its greatest force might be marked five, in a scale between a gentle breeze, at one, and a hurricane, at ten. The writer has measured one traveling at about thirty-two miles per hour— but many others at twelve to eighteen miles. The mean progress seems to be about fifteen miles per hour. 12. Just before a norther, two to six hours, the south wind lulls, and the still air becomes very oppressive. A low black cloud rolls up from the north, and when it comes near the zenith, the wind strikes with vigor. Sometimes we have a sudden dash of rain; but generally northers are intensely dry, and soon drink up all the moisture of the surface earth, and of the objects upon it, capable of yielding their humidity. Great thirst of man, and all other animals, is experienced ; an itching sensation over the skin ; a highly electric condition of the skin of horses and cats ; a wilting and withering of vegetation, even when the tempe- rature would not account for it ; a reduction of temperature, usually very sudden, sometimes, though rarely, a degree per minute, for twenty minutes ; and in winter commonly a reduction from 70° or 75°, to 30° or 40°. This fall of temperature is the more severely felt from the drying power of the north wind — evaporation from the surface of the skin increasing the severity of the temperature. 13. Nervous, rheumatic, and gouty persons suffer more severely than others. To invalids suffering from other maladies, it has not been found unhealthy ; and for persons of weak lungs, if not too much exposed to its direct fury, it is found, to be more salubrious than the humid south winds. Consumptions do not originate over the area of the noi'ther. On the contrary, many persons afflicted with weak or diseased lungs, resort to this region, and find relief. The western and northern portions of this area are most salubrious, and best adapted to weak lungs. * * * * * *** * * Phenomena not readily explicable. — When a dry norther commences, the whole air, in an hour or two, curdles, and becomes smoky, or rather whitish, and has a distinct smell. Its odor sometimes resembles that which is developed by a flash of lightning, though, at other times, it reminds one of fine straw smoke, in its odor. It is highly probable that this turbidness and odor, are d^e to the ozone set free, by the high electrical excitation, in a dry norther. Ex- periments instituted to test the matter, last April, were too late in the Sirocco. — When the norther has a little westing, it is observed to be more intensely dry, and to be destructive to vegetation, even before the frost which usually follows it. Corn, beans, young foliage, and the grass and weeds of the prairie, bow and wither before it.* A few of these I have called Siroccos. They occur as well in summer as in spring or autumn, and differ, in several respects, from the true norther. * The citizens of Galveston, and the southern portions of Texas, will remember the violent north-wester in 1856, which preceded and attended the storm which wrecked the Nautilus. It was, in my judgment, a true Sirocco. In like manner the north-west wind, that withered the corn-fields in Lamar, Fannin, and Grayson, and the counties south of these, on the 17th day of August, 1858, deserves a like name. APPENDIX P. 431 SEASONS AND CROPS: THEIR VICISSITUDES. 1857. 1858. 1859. 1860. January. — No rain. January. — No se- vere cold ; abundant January — Some se- vere weather. Rain January. — Moder- ately cold. Rain, 1.5 •. rain. 2>£ inches. nch. February 6.— Prai- February 3. — Vio- February 15— Grass February 1, 2, 3, 24, ries getting green.— ent storm. 1st. Bra- covers woods anc 25, 26.— Frost. 17th. 10th. Corn, peas, let- zos overflows. 22d. prairies ; corn-plant- iain copious, East- tuce, and radishes Peaches killed by ing begins. 24th.- Texas. Whole rain of coming up. Rain 1 rost, 25 deg. 27th. Woods gray. Rain 1 month, 5 inches. inch. Growing weather. inch. March 7. — Corn six March 2.— Freeze, March 6. —Woods March 5.— Prairies inches high; prairies one month forward. 24 deg. 20th. Woods greenish ; grasshop- lalf-green ; rye head- ing; dogwoods bloom; green; corn-planting ; woods gray. Frost, 12th. Terrible frost; kills every thing — >ers hatching, west. 27th. Make havoc and corn coming up gen- erally. 20th. Good 28-9 cuts off cotton and some corn, and frui t and crops. Rain migrate. 17th. Corn stand ; post oaks gardens. 14th. Rad- 1 inch. planted. 25th. Squir- naked, blackjacks shes and lettuce.— rels migrate on Trin- green. 23d. Wild Whole rain, 1.5 in. ty. geese leave.and doves coo. Rain— 7.87. 28th. Geese migrate ; good prospects of crop. April [5.— All green again ; new crops up April 1 — Grasshop- >ers bad in Guada- April 1.— Radishes and lettuce. 23d.— April 1. — Whip- loor - wills. 6th. — and vigorous. 6th. Norther, hail, and freeze; all crops, fruit, oupe; May 20, coun- ry eaten up by them west of 97° 10'. Frost kills corn and cotton in low grounds Rain, 0.69 in. iVoods quite green. 4th. Ground crack- ng from drouth. — and mast, killed. 11- 21st. Dewberries ripe. 12th. Sleet, snow, and 9th-27th, good rains; freeze, again. 24th. otal, 3.8 inches. Frost in valleys. - Rain, % inch. May 30.— Rain two inches — not 12 inches in a year. May 1 to 9.— Rain o% inches ; wheat, oats, rye and millet May 7.— Fair rains start the re-planted crops ; not one grass- lopper in the land. May 1. — Crops very iromising ; no grass- loppers. 15th. Crops wilt for want of rain. die of rust. 10-15th. livers overflow. 25- 30th. Corn tasseling ; 22d. Crops look well; wheat harvest begins. 28th. Wheat harvest 25th. Corn tasseling ; very dry. 21st. Rye ripe. 26th. Oats cut. leans, peas and pota- oes in use from 10th. closes; early corn tas- sels. Total rain, 6.76 30th. Wheat ripe and cutting. Rain, 0.35 in. inches. June 11. — Wheat June. — Showery June 3. — Roasting June. — No rain this reaped ; good crop ; weather, llth. Great ears. llth. Rain saves month. Corn per- man and beast suffer- rain. Rain in June, corn ; total, 0.50 in. shes, gardens die, ing for water. 20th. 6K inches. 6th. Roast- creeks and springs Grass all dead. ng ears. dry up. Mucli corn cut up west of Colorado. layette and Wash- ngton make half- crops corn; wheat, oats, rye, and barley good. Greatest [routh over United States ever remem- >ered. July. — No rain ! August, no rain 1 July. — Rain 1 inch. GSood corn crops over most of the State.— July. — Very dry. — Total rain, 0.90. 30th. Cattle suffer for water July 1.— Cattle suf- er for water ; ponds and creeks all dry ; lust kills all small ontinues to July rain. 8th, when this report closes. 432 APPENDIX F. 1857. 1858. 1859. 1860. August and Sep- tember.— Dry ; only 1 inch rain. August— Rain, 0.50; west of 97° no rain ; all summer corn and cotton dead. August gave showers in Guadaloupe, etc. | September 7.— Oaks drying from drouth, except live oak. First good rain this year, 2 Sept,— Good rains ; 5.85 inches. inches. October.— Rain, 3X October. — Good October. — Good inches. The prairies rains, 3.7 inches. rains, 6.60 inches. green. November.— Grass- November. — Some November. — Warm hoppers, west. Rea- sonable rains ; good rain— 2>£ inches. and pleasant mouth ; no rain. fall gardens. 26-27th. Hard storms very extensive; Nebraska wrecked at Galvee- ton. Rain, 2K inches. December — Lowest December.— Rains December 1 to 8. — temperature, 30°. copious, 4.4 inches.— Terrible winter No severe cold. weather; snow, sleet rain and freeze ; kills cattle, horses a n c sheep in vast num- t>ers. Hardest Decem- ber ever known. NORTHERS, WINTER OF 1859-60. First genuine norther, Sept. SOjNumber of days occupied, 101 Last genuine norther, April 23j Average duration, hours, 89 Number of weeks' time, 28Lowest day's temperature, Dec. 6th, ...16' Number of northers, 28|Lowest 3 days' norther, Dec. 6th, 20.3 TEMPERATURE AND HYGROMETRY OF 1859 AND PART OF 1860. 18 59. I860. January, . . February, . March,.... April, May, June, July, August,... September, October, . . . November, December,. Annual, . SUNK. 45.11 46.04 53.it; 63.60 73.40 81.21 IN. 1.40 4.85 1.35 o!35 0.00 41 .00 55.19 53.71 59.44 T1.48 72.2:; 82.05 79.01 75.30 59.80 55.16 35.00 63.58 7"..:-.2 71.50 7'J.C'ii 84.22 SS.J1S 89.77 93.02 85.00 75.20 74.43 54,00 47.19 58.82 59.00 03.611 71.13 80.07 S2.K XL' .04 78,00 63.86 61.16 •40.00 50.57 02.44 61.50 65.31 75.61 81.56 84.76 84.90 79.42 66.29 63.92 43.00 4S.IMI 50.50 54.50 59.33 69.33 7.( >:; 55.40 61.13 69.47 7H.22 85.58 4S.7:; 50.17 55.24 64.2(1 69.04 5.18 68.04 &e 60.42 76.51 63.03 66.67 60.44 11.75 APPENDIX G. 433 APPENDIX G. PBOPORTIONOP WOOL TO MEAT IS SHEEP OP DIFFEEEIIT AGES, SEXES AND SIZES. THE following was not received until this work was nearly through the press, and too late to refer to it except in this place : POMPEY, Onon. Co., N. Y., Aug. 22, 1863. HON. HENRY S. RANDALL — Dear Sir: Agreeable to your request, I herewith send you my investigations and observations upon the compar- ative weight of wool and bodies of sheep. I hope they will be of benefit to the sheep breeder, as well as tl«e wool grower ; ana that I shall have the satisfaction of knowing that I have in part repaid to the world much that I owe for the investigations of those who have gone before me. With high hopes, but no higher ambition than to beT called a " good farmer," I remain your obedient servant, HOMER D. L. SWEET. COMPABATIVE WEIGHT OP WOOL ABTD BODIES OF SHEEP. BY H. D. L. SWEET. The Hon. Robert R. Livingston, the first President of the first Agri- cultural Society of the State of New York, in his justly celebrated essay on Fine-Wooled Sheep, uses the following language : " The inferiority in the size of the Merino to some other breeds, which some make as an objection, is, in my opinion, an important advantage, not only in sheep but in every other stock not designed for the draft ; because they will fatten in pastures hi which larger cattle would suffer from the fatigue they must undergo, in order to procure the food that is necessary for their support. " This meaning applies more strongly to sheep than to any other stock. They are generally kept upon high and dry pastures, that are frequently parched in summer, when fatigue is most irksome to them. To which we may add that the fleece is not proportioned, as the food is to the bulk of the animal, but to his surface, and a small sheep having more surface in proportion to his bulk, must also have wool in the same proportion. That is, a sheep whose live weight shall be 60 Ibs., and who, of course, will require but one-quarter of the food of a sheep that ighs 240 Ibs. will, notwithstanding, have half as much wool (if the jces are equally thick,) as his gigantic brother." * Transactions of the Society for the Promotion of Useful Arts, Vol. II, p. 86. 434 APPENDIX G. In proof of the first proposition, that sheep do consume in proportion to their bulk, Mr. Livingston submits, in an appendix to his essay, the record of many experiments which show conclusively that such is the fact ; but of his second proposition, that they shear in proportion to their surface, he gives no facts, and I suppose it to be mere theory. The attention of the writer was called to this subject by the Hon. George Geddes, some four years since, and at his request the trial was made, and the result has been given to the world by yourself. Experiments of the same character on the same flock have been conducted for three successive years, and their results are recorded in the following tables. In one or two points they are not as perfect as I could wish, but they are the best that could be done with so small a flock. Had there been from forty to fifty in each class and every year, the natural law hi rela- tion to them might be nearer in accordance with the facts noted ; for as there are exceptions to all rules, I may be giving the exception and not the rule. This can be true only in regard to five and six year old ewes, and five year old wethers. In all other cases, taking the tin ee years collectively, I am confident that facts of value have been obtained. The base of the flock a few years since was Saxon ; they are now classed from one-half to seven-eighths Spanish Merino — a portion of the largest, in 1861, was one-quarter French Merino. In 1861 the ewes raised 35 lambs; hi 1862, 30, and in 1863,70. In the fall of '61 the oldest and largest were sold and replaced by 60 lambs purchased. In the fall of '62, 70 wether lambs were purchased, part of the smallest of them were sold, some three-year old ewes purchased ; and some older ones sold. Other discrepancies that may be noted are attributable to death. They were all brook-washed about two weeks before shearing. The flocks at the time of shearing were in good condition — some of the ewes thin, of course. The four rams in the flock are included with the wethers, to save space, figures and calculation. The first table is the same as published in 1862, hi Mr. Randall's Essay, in the Transactions of the N. Y. S. Agricultural Society, except that I have subdivided the sexes. The fifth table is the same as the second one then published, except that I have added the last three classes, and called them one. They were sheared the 26th and 27th of June, 1861 ; 27th, 28th and 30th of June, 1862, and 25th, 26th and 27th of June, 1863. Every sheep and fleece were weighed separately and recorded on the spot. ['The tables referred to in the preceding paragraphs are given on the two following pages.] APPENDIX G. 435 SWEET BROTHER'S FLOCK, POMPEY, N". Y. TABLE 1. 1361.- CLASSIFIED BY AGE AND SEX. No. IN- CLASS. AGES. SE EWES XES, WETH'S. GROSS W'T. OF WT.OF AVEK. OF AVER. OF Lus. OF BODT TO L OF WL. PER Ci. OF W. TO GR. WT. 19 13 15 15 9 42 41 26 180 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 E E E W W W W 1,193.72 965.23 1,124.37 1,383.92 759.14 4,155.11 3,738. 2,921.13 1,097 894 1'048 1,299 710 3,891 3,557 2,736 96.72 71.23 76.37 84.92 49.14 264.11 181. 185.13 52.47 68.77 69.86 86.66 78.88 92.64 86.75 105.11 5.09 5.48 5.09 5.66 5.45 6.28 4.41 7.12 10.44 12.55 13.72 15.29 14.45 14.73 19.65 14.76 8.10 7.37 6.88 •6.53 6.46 6.83 4.84 6.33 1 to 4 84 96 16.341. 15,331 1.010 85.17 5.38 15.17 6.18 TABLE 2. 1862.— CLASSIFIED i JY AGE AND SEX. 42 62 19 13 14 13 9 27 15 11 215 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 1 to 5 E E E E E 99 W W W W W 2,378.57 3,224.51 1,387.16 1,225.16 1,026.31 1,297.36 726.59 2.693.06 1,178.15 1,153.40 2,189 2,985 1,292 1,147 960 1,215 679 2,505 l|l 11 1,075 189.57 239.51 95.16 78.16 66.31 82.36 47.59 188.06 67.15 78.40 52.11 67.40 68. 88.23 68.57 93.40 77.44 92.77 74. 97.72 4.61 4.60 5. 6. 4.70 6.33 5.28 6.96 4.47 7.12 11.60 12.46 13.57 14.60 14.47 14.75 14.26 13.32 16.54 13.71 7.96 7.42 6.86 6.46 6.46 6.35 6.54 6.98 6.77 7.00 116 Il6.290.27 15,158il,l:!2.27 70.50 5.26 13.30 6.95 TABLE 3. 1863.— CLASSIFIED BY AGE AND SEX. 14 78 42 48 33 13 13 9 10 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 5 6 E E E E E E W W W 955.78 5,623.84 2,861.64 3,994.79 2,837.24 1,338.89 1,154.68 735.93 837.84 877 5,201 2,662 3,735 2,658 1,251 1,083 680 790 78.78 422.84 199.64 259.79 179.24 87.89 71.68 45.93 47.84 62.64 66.67 63.38 77.81 80.54 96.23 83.30 75.35 79.00 6.62 5.42 4.75 5.41 5.40 6.76 6.51 5.10 4.78 11.00 12.30 13.33 14.37 14.82 14.23 15.10 14.82 16.49 8.24 7.71 6.97 6.50 6.31 6.56 6.26 6.24 5.70 260 1 to 6 121 139 20,350.63 18,957 1,393.63 72.91 5.32 13.58 6.84 TABLE 4. AVERAGE OF THE THREE YEARS. Classified by Age and Sex, the Footing being the three Flocks collectively. No. IN CLASS. AGE. SEX. AV'AGB WT. OF Boor. AVERAGE WT. OF FLEECE. POUNDS OF BODT TO 1 OF WOOL. AVERAGE PER CENT. 75 1 E 65.74 5.07 11.01 8.10 76 2 E 67.08 4.94 13.54 6.90 56 3 E 75.99 5.18 14.58 6.41 63 4 E 82.49 5.06 16.33 5.83 24 5 E 74.67 4.75 15.68 6.00 10 6 E 79.00 4.78 16.49 5.70 143 1 W 64.28 5.16 12.43 7.50 76 2 W 84.23 5.69 14.77 6.49 68 3 W 88.86 6.45 14.57 6.58 53 4 W 103.94 7,04 14.04 6.65 11 5 W 97.72 uj 13.71 7.00 EWES. WETH. 655 304 351 79.52 5.32 14.01 6.65 436 APPENDIX 6. TABLE 5. 1861. — CLASSIFIED BY WEIGHT, In divisions of 10 Pounds each, except those weighing less than 50 /5s., and those more than 100 Ibs. No. IN CLASS. WEIGHT OF DIVIS- IONS. SE3 EWES. E§. WETH. GROSS WEIGHT. W'T. OF BODIES. WT.OF WOOL. AVER.OF|AVER.OFLLBS-OF BODIES. FLEECES.|f°yYwTL° PER CT. 5 14 20 34 39 34 34 42 to 51 50 to 61 «0 to 71 70 to 81 80 to 91 90 to 101 100tol34 5 10 14 21 19 11 4 4 6 13 20 23 30 256. 871. 1,427. 2,742. 3,566. 3,453. 4,026. 234 803 1,320 2,567 3,355 3,252 3,800 22. 107! 175. 211. 201. 226. 46.80 67.35 66. 75.50 86. 95.64 111.76 4.40 4.85 5.35 5.14 5.41 5.91 6.67 10.63 11.80 12.33 14.66 15.87 15.42 16.80 8.59 7.80 7.49 6.38 5.90 5.82 5.61 180 42 to 134 84 96 16,341. 15,331 1,010. 85.17 5.38 15.17 6.18 TABLE 6. 1862. — CLASSIFIED BY WEIGHT, AS BEFORE. 37 34 to 51 23 14 1,875. 1,725 150. 46.60 4.05 11.50 8.00 41 50 to 61 19 2,460. 2,270 190. 55.37 4.63 11.94 7.72 42 60 to 71 25 17 2,940. 2,740 200. 65.23 4.75 13.70 6.80 30 70 to 81 24 6 2,432. 2,272 160. 75.73 5.33 14.20 6.57 25 80 to 91 6 19 2,266. 2,110 156. 84.40 6.24 13.52 6.88 25 90 to 101 2 23 2,568. 2,408 160. 96.32 6.40 15.05 5.84 15 100tol27 15 1,743.27 1,633 110.27 108.86 7.35 14.80 6.32 215 34 to 127l 99 116 116,290.27 15,158 1,132.27 70.501 5.26 13.3o! 6.95 TABLE 7. 1863.— CLASSIFIED BY WEIGHT, AS BEFORE. 10 136 to 51 5 5 493. 455 38. 40.50 3.80 11.97 7.91 34 50 to 61 15 19 2,009. 1,850 159. 54.44 4.67 114.15 7.90 67 50 to 71 33 34 4 828 4,480 348. 66.88 6.19 12.87 7.20 96 70 to 81 44 52 7,755. 7,230 525. 75.30 5.46 13.77 6.76 28 80 to 91 14 14 2,550. 2,390 160. 85.35 5.71 14.93 6.23 16 90 to 101 7 9 1,628. 1,532 96. 95.75 6.00 15.85 5.89 9 lOOtoUO 3 6 1,087.63 1,020 67.63 113.33 7.51 15.09 6.21 260 36 to 140 121 139 20,350.63 18,957 1,393.63 72.9l| 5.32 1 13.58 6.84 TABLE 8. THE AVERAGE OF TABLES 5, 6 AND 7. No. IN CLASS. WEIGHT or DIVISIONS. SE3 EWES. :ES. WETH'S. AVERAGE WEIGHT OF BODIES. AVERAGE WEIGHT OF FLEECES. POUNDS OF BODY TO 1 OF WOOL. Tl.36 11.90 12.96 14.21 14.77 15.44 15.56 PER CENT. OF WOOL. 8.16 7.80 7.13 6.53 6.33 5.85 6.04 52 89 129 160 92 75 58 34 to 51 50 to 61 60 to 71 70 to 81 80 to 91 90 to 101 100 to 140 44 72 89 39 20 7 19 45 57 71 53 55 51 44.63 55.78 66.03 75.52 85.25 95.90 111.31 4.08 4.71 5.09 5.31 5.78 6.10 7.17 655 34 to 140 304 351 79.52 5.32 14.01 6.65 The value of these tables can only be known by careful comparison and thorough study . of them. What may be learned I have not now the time to determine ; but from a very cursory glance at them, I learn that Mr. Livingston's proposition is true. Small sheep do shear more in proportion to their bulk than large ones, without regard to age or APPENDIX G. 437 sex. I learn, also, that yearling ewes shear the largest per centage they ever will shear, and that they shear less and less per centage as they grow older, till they are four years old. They gain until five, when they are in their prime, and raising a lamb at that age does not decrease the product of wool as it has done ; but at six they have passed the meri- dian, and for the product of wool commence going " down hill." It can be seen at a glance that wethers shear their largest per cent, when yearlings. At two, they have lost 1 per cent., after which they commence gaining, and continue to gain till they are five years old, after which I know nothing of the facts. The facts are just as obvious in the classification by weight. The smallest sheep shear the largest per centage, and as their weight increases the fleece decreases in proportion, till they weigh more than 100 Ibs., when it increases the fifth of 1 per cent. — a smaller increase than any decrease in either of the tables. This being the exception to what before seemed to be the rule, leads me to believe that the number in the class is too small, and that I ought to have had 100 sheep at least in this class to arrive at the truth. If it could be ascertained what per cent, of lambs 100 or 1,000 ewes would raise, and the average market price of average lambs on the 1st of October, it could be very easily calculated which would be the most profitable to keep, a flock of ewes or wethers. But as there is no likelihood of this being done, and as ewes are absolutely necessary to increase the flock, perhaps no farmer will be bold enough to have a flock exclusively of wethers, though I am confident that these tables will prove that the wethers have brought to the farm the most money at the average price of wool and lambs. If I had the tune I might pursue these deductions further, with profit to myself if not to those who read ; but I think enough has already been disclosed to give any inquiring mind a stimulus to pursue the investigation. Every wool raiser ought to know which of his sheep he is keeping at a profit and which at a loss. By weighing the fleeces as they are shorn, he thinks he knows all about it, when in reality he knows nothing, or at the best only half. At sheep shearing the careful breeder ought to know what any sheep ought to shear when it comes on the floor. For instance, next year we shall have a dozen four year old wethers, any one of which ought to weigh somewhere near ninety pounds and shear seven pounds. If any one weighs up to the average of the last threeyears, and shears above the average, keep him — if below, sell him. When a ewe is brought on the floor, other things have to be taken into consideration, as she is to breed, viz., the quality of the wool, the form of the body, beside the weight of the fleece and weight of the body. If she has raised a lamb, it must be examined ; if a ewe lamb, particularly. In our flock we have now made a standard to which we can refer ; our efforts of course will be to excel it. Those who keep flocks expressly for their increase, will make a standard of their own, and those who keep sheep exclusively for wool, will make their standard accordingly. Every breeder ought to know every fact certainly, and have his record to refer to. 438 APPENDIX H. APPENDIX H — (page 75.) THE AMEBIOAN MERINOS AT THE INTEKNATIONAL EXHIBITION OP 1863. IT was noticed at page 75 that Mr. George Campbell, of West West- minster, Vermont, took American Merino sheep to exhibit at the International Exhibition at Hamburg, in July, 1863. The result was not ascertained in time to be alluded to in the body of this work. Mr. Campbell found 1,761 sheep competing in the same class with his own. They were from the Austrian, Prussian and other States of Germany, and from France. Among the French sheep competing were about sixty belonging to the Emperor Napoleon. Mr. Campbell was awarded the first prize of fifty thalers for the best ram, the second prize of twenty-five thalers for the second best ram, and the first prize of fifty thalers for the best ewes. The Committee of Award consisted of eighteen noblemen and gentlemen. The examinations were made by sub-committees, whose preliminary reports were subject to the revision of the general committee. The American sheep had encountered a certain degree of prejudice from their first arrival. The breeders of the old world, and particularly of Germany, seemed to think it audacious that Americans, who had so often imported sheep from Germany, should now enter the lists as competitors against them. And when a rumor began to gain ground that the sub - committee were disposed to award one and then two first prizes to the American Merinos, it caused loud expressions of dissatis- faction, which were promptly re-echoed in the German newspapers. Notwithstanding, and in defiance of all of this, the general committee with manly independence ratified the action of the sub-committee by a unanimous vote. On the ofilcial promulgation of the decision, the previous censures took the form of accusations. It was asserted that the committee had been unduly influenced. Thereupon Col. Daniei Needham, Corresponding Secretary of the Vermont State Agricultural Society, wjio was present at the Exhibition as the Commissioner of the State of Vermont, after conferring with the U. S. Commissioner, Gov. Wright, and Mr. Campbell, published a card in the German tongue, projBsing a sweepstakes open to all the previous competitors — the awjird to be made by a new committee, to be selected by the German association under whose auspices and direction the International Exhibition took place. Col. Needham's proposal was that each com- petitor pay an entrance fee of $10; and if there were less than ten entries he offered himself to make up the prize to $100. This offer, (substantially a challenge to a new trial,) was posted and circulated among all the competitors. Mr. Campbell immediately entered his sheep, but Ms was Vie only entry ! This rendered the triumph of the American Merinos absolute and undeniable; and the press and public, with that hearty honesty which always marks the German national character, did ample justice to the Americans and to the American sheep. Mr. Campbell sold his prize sheep, twelve in number, to a Prussian nobleman for $5,000. APPENDIX H. 439 The highest priced foreign Merino sold at the Exhibition fetched but £40, or $200. The preceding facts are stated on the personal authority of Mr. Campbell and Col. Needham. I cannot here withhold a pleasing fact which strikingly evidences the fairness and the modesty of the victorious exhibitor at Hamburg. Col. Needham informs me that Mr. Campbell on all occasions, signified to the breeders of Germany and France, and requested him, (Col. Needham,) to signify that he was not the founder or leading breeder of the improved family of American Merinos, which his (Mr. Campbell's,) sheep chiefly represented — but that this honor belonged to Mr. Hammond. Mr. C.'s show sheep were, if I remember aright, all from his celebrated ram " Old Grimes " bred by Mr. Hammond and got by his " Sweep- stakes." "Old Grimes" competed against his sire in the great sweepstakes at the Vermont State Fair of 1861, and stood second. He is remarkable for individual excellence and as a stock getter. I was one of those consulted by Mr. Campbell in reference to taking American Merinos to the International Exhibition, and I strongly encouraged him to do so. I had just as little doubt of their success then as now, provided they could receive fair play ; and I never for an instant doubted that among the many Germans they would receive the same fair play which our stock and products have received at all these World's Fairs. In Germany as in England, we encountered some prejudice- but when the time for official action arrived, it always gave way like a morning mist before the broad, bright sun of personal and official honor. LIST OE ILLUSTRATIONS. Merino Ram " Sweepstakes," Frontispiece Spanish Wool, 16 Saxon Ram, 26 Merino Ewe, (Imported Paular,) 31 Merino Ewe, (Old Fashioned,) 34 Silesian Merino Ram, 38 Group of Silesian Ewes, 41 Leicester Ram, 45 Leicester Ewe, 47 Cotswold Ram, 48 Cotswold Ewe, 50 South Down Ram, 56 South Down Ewes, 57 Shropshire Down Ram, 62 Shropshire Down Ewe, 64 Shepherd's Crook 139 Tagging, illustrated, 141 Toe-Nippers, 169 Folding Tables, 173 Fleece Ready for Press, 173 Fleece in Press, 174 Wool Press, 174 Tattooing Instruments, (three figures,) 184 Ears Tattooed, ; 184 Metal Ear - Mark, 185 Dipping Box, 187 Shed of Poles 211 Sheep Barn, with Open Sheds, 213 Ground Plan of Sheep Barn and' Yards, 217 Ground Plan of a Sheep Establishment, 218 Slatted Box Rack, 230 Wall Rack and Trough 231 End View of Wall Rack and Trough, 232 Skull of a Sheep, 265 Teeth of the Sheep, 266 Section of Sheep's Head, 273 Gr.d-Fly of the Sheep, 274 The " Grub " or Larva of the Gad -Fly, (three figures,) 274 The Stomachs, 294 Internal Appearance of Stomachs, 295 The Intestines and Mesentary, 303 Spanish Sheep Dog, , 397 The Scotch Sheep Dog, or Colley, 409 The English Sheep, or Drover's Dog 407 INDEX. Abortion, 329. Abscess, 382. Adams, Seth imports Merinos into United States, 22. Allen, A. B. describes first French Merinos imported into United States, 35. recommends tar, sulphur and alum for diseased sheep, 194. Anatomy of the sheep, 264, et seq. cut of skeleton, 264. cut of skull, 265. cut of teeth, 266. cut of section of sheep's head, 273. the omentums described, 293. cut of external appearance of stomachs, 294. cut of internal appearance of stomachs, stomachs and their functions described, 295. mode of introducing medicines into the stomach, 299. cut of the intestines, 303. Apoplexy, 280. Arlington loug-wooled sheep, origin of 44, Atwood. Stephen, his family of Merinos described, 28, 29. his family of Merinos compared with Mr. Jarvis' 28. their improvement in other hands, 29, 30. a strict in-and-in breeder, 120. the improved Paulars receive a cross from his flock, 417-419. Baker, the Messrs., their experiments in crossing French and American Me- rinos, 129 note. Bakewell, Robert, the great improver of Leicester sheep, 45. an in-and-in breeder, 46, 119. in-and-in breeding formed an element of his success, 132. origin of his flock not probably drawn from different breeds, 133. Ms sheep improved by Cotswold blood, 47, 133. 19* Bakewell, Robert, he purposely rotted sheep, 376. Barns for sheep, construction of, 212-219. cuts of 213, 217, 218. should be cleaned out in winter, 219. Beanes, Capt., imports Teeswater and South Down sheep, 44 note. Bedford, Dr., on the necessity of exercise, etc., to pregnant females, 222. Beets as sheep feed, 243. Bement, Caleb N., his account of C. Dunn's flock, 44 note. Biflex Canal, disease of, 354, 355. Bigelow, Dr., account of St. Johns-wort, Black-faced Scotch sheep described, 51. introduced into the United States by Samuel Campbell, 52. weight of their fleeces, 52. imported by Sanford Howard, 52. Blacklock, Mr., cited in regard to diseases of sheep, 277, 316. ^.ain, 291, 292. Blanchard, H., introduces the Wool Depot system, 177. Bleeding, place for, 314, 315. mode of performing, 314, 315. Boardman, S. P., states cost of getting wool and other products to market from Illinois, 251 note, his article on prairie sheep husbandry, 260. Brain, hydatid on, 277-279. water on, 279, 280. inflammation of the, 281. Braxy, 311. Breeding, in-and-in, extent of among im- proved Infantados, 30. definition of the term, 101. like produces like, 101. breeding back, 101. causes of hereditary transmission partly controllable, 101, 102. likeness inherited with unifon among full bloods, 102. mongrels, etc., do not transmit like- ness with uniformity, 102. counteracting the defects of one parent by the excellencies of the other, 103. hereditary predispositions to be re garded, 103. accidental characteristics, how ac counted for, 103, 104. rmity 442 INDEX. Breeding, accidental characteristics are sometimes vigorously reproduced Breeding, great extent of their in-and-in breeding, 119 note. and become established, 103-106. are peculiarities acquired after birth it formed an important element of their success, 122. transmissable ? 103 note. it is almost necessary in some cases. accidental characteristics less trans-! 122. missable when opposed to the specia it is not safe for ordinary breeders, 122. ones of the breed, 105. more have failed than have succeeded breeding between animals possessing in it, 123. the same defect to be avoided, 106. relative influence of sire and dam on is it more dangerous among grade ani- mals ? 123. progeny, 106. the theory that the animal organiza tion is transmitted by halves, 107. Mr. Walker's modification of this crossing breeds and families — (For everything connected with crossing see Cross - Breeding), expedient to adhere to one breed and theory, 107, et seq. Mr. Spooner's views on the same sub- family if it possesses proper ele- ments of improvement, 131. ject, 107, et seq. the most splendid successes have beeu the foregoing theories examined, 107- properties transmitted by degrees, not by halves, 109. won in this way, 131, and note, great skill of English breeders in breeding mutton sheep, 132 note, breeding lambs for butcher, 133, 134. mode of their transmission, 109. the ram oftenest transmits his externa' breeding mutton sheep on the prairies, structure to progeny, 109, 110. the ram oftenest gives size and a part of the qualities of the fleece, 110. •When cross-breeding is expedient, and when inexpedient generally, 136-138. Breeds of sheep best adapted to different influence of the ewe on the progeny, situations, 82-90. 110. causes of the ram's superiority in this particular, 110, et seq. rules for determining that adaptation, 82-90. influence of markets, 82-85. influence of higher breeding among influence of climate, 85, 86. full bloods, 111, 112. influence of vegetation, 86-88. influence of pure over grade, etc., influence of soils, 88, 89. blood, 111. influence of herding, 89. why rams of same blood differ in influence of associated branches of transmitting their qualities, 111. husbandry, 89, 90. influence of physical and sexual vigor, comparative hardiness of English, 87. 112. indications of these in the ram, 112 working qualities of different breeds,87. crossing between different— (see Cross- note, 113. Breeding.) ability of rams to procreate at differ- ent ages, 113. longevity of different, 113. Broad -Tailed sheep introduced into the period of procreation in Merino, 113. United States, 53. longevity of different breeds, 113, 114. does the male which first impregnates bred pure in South Carolina, 53. Bronchitis, 326. a female influence her subsequent Brugnone cited in regard to diseases of offspring? 114 sheep, 277-302. Mr. CHne's theory that small males Bruises and strains. 382. and large females should be coupled, 114, 115. Buignot inoculates for small pox, 349. 3urs should be eradicated from pastures, in-and-in breeding, how the term is 142. used in this work, 116. the different kinds of, injurious to Sir John Sebright's views, and his wool, 142. use of this term, 116-118. prejudice against breeding in-and-in in the United States, 116. C its effect where hereditary diseases prevail, 117. Campbell, George, takes Merinos to it results from Divine ordination in World's Fair at Hamburg, 75. many instances, 117, 118. length of wool on sheep taken to difference between men and brutes in World's Fair, 75. this particular, 118. difference between wild and domesti- pedigrees of the sheep, 76. his mode of tattooing sheep, 184. cated brutes in this particular, 118. his sheep victorious at the World's under what circumstances in-and-in Fair, 438, 439. breeding is fatal, 118. his honorable conduct, 439. under what circumstances it is innoc- pedigree of his stock ram, 439. uous, 118. Campbefl, Samuel, and James Brodie, eminent foreign in-and-in breeders, 119. import Leicester sheep, 47. INDEX. 443 Campbell, Samnel. and James Brodic, cats of a ram and ewe belonging to them, import Cheviot sheep, 52. Canada Breeders of, 351. Carcass the first point to be regarded in sheep, 69. proper form and size of the Merino. 69. Carrots as sheep feed, 243. Castration, 101. Catarrh, 268, 318, 319. Malignant epizootic, 319-324. Catching and handling sheep, proper mode of; 131-141. Chamberlain, William, his account of the present Merinos in Spain, 17, 18. introduces Silesian Merinos into the United States, 39. his description of his sheep, 39-42. cut of a group of his ewes, 41. a close in-and-in breeder, 120. time he has his lambs yeaned, 143 note. Chevoit sheep introduced into the United States, 52. character of the unimproved family, 52. the improved family described, 52, 53. Chilled Lambs, how treated, 148, 149. Chinese, or Nankin sheep in the United States, 54. Choking, 292, 293. Clapp, the Messrs., their experiments in crossing French and American Meri- nos, 129 note. Clark, Bracy, cited in regard to diseases of sheep, 274. 275. Clift, Leonard D., imports Lincoln sheep in 1835, 50. character of his sheep, 50, Climate to be regarded in selecting a breed of sheep, 85, 86. Cline, Mr., his views on disparity in size of sire and dam in breeding, 114. Closed Teats, 157. Clover, as sheep feed, 235, 237, 246. Clumps of trees in pastures, utility of, 212. Colic, 310. Colley, (See Dog.) Collins, D. C., introduces French Merinos in the United States, 34. description of his she ep, 35. Coloring Sheep artificially, a fraud, 81. Confinement, eflect of on pregnant ewes Congenital Goitre, or swelled neck, 152- 154. Constipation of sheep, 221, 228, 310. of young lambs, 149. Consumption, 327, 328, 379. Corning, Erastus, with Wm. H. Sotham imports Cotswold sheep, 48. Cornstalks as sheep feed, 245, 258. Cossit, Capt. Davis, his remarkable sue cess in crossing Infantado and Saxon Merinos, 130 and note, pedigree of his ram, " Wrinkly 3d,' 415. Costiveness, (See Constipation.) Cotswold Sheep introduced into the Uni ted States about 35 years since, 48. Cotswold Sheep, imported by Mr. Dunn in 1832, 48. imported by Messrs. Corning & Sotham in 1840, 48. imported by Henry G. White, 49. described by Mr. Spooner, 49. Crook, shepherd's, manner of using, 139. cut of, 139, Cross - breeding, meaning of term as used in this book, 124. effects of between the Merinos and coarse breeds, 124. the Merino unimprovable by such a cross, 124. the Merino cross improves coarse sheep for certain purposes, 125. the cross between Merino and mutton sheep results in failure, 124, 125, the cross between the Merino and long wools, 125. the cross between the Merino and Downs, 125. permanent intermediate varieties un- attainable, 125. peculiar tenacity of hereditary trans- mission in the Merino, 125. due probably to its great purity and antiquity of blood, 125 note, coarse breeds can be merged in it, 126. grade flocks started in Texas, 126. successful cross between Merino and Mexican sheep, 126. experience of Mr. Kendall in this par- ticular, 126, note, choice rams desirable in such a cross , 127. grades never equal to pure Merinos, 127. French ideas on this subject, 127. German ideas on same subject, 127. degrees of blood in ascending crosses reckoned, 127 note, crossing different families of Merinos, 127-130. effect of in the French Merino, 128. effect of, in Mr. Jarvis' flock, 128. effect of, in the Rich or improved Pan- lars, 128 and note, effect of in the Silesian Merinos of the United States, 128, 129. •between the American and French Merino, 129 and note, between the American and Saxon Me- rino, 129. remarkable result of an improved In- fantado and Saxon cross, 130 and note, inexpediency of crossing for the sake of crossing, 130. 131. ordinary reasons for crossing unfound- ed, 131. bad effects of frequent and unmeaning crosses, 131. always better to adhere to one breed and family if it contains the elements of improvement, 131. the most splendid successes have been secured in this way, 131, and note, crossing between English families, 132. 444 Cross-breeding, the Hampshire, Shropshire and Oxfordshire Downs produced in this way. 132. but the failures in blending breeds have been far more numerous, 132. skill of the English breeders, 132 note, successful to obtain larger and earlier lambs for the butcher, 133. expediency of thus crossing with local families, 134. Mr. Tkorne's experience in this par- ticular, 134, 135 note, an analogous cross for mutton raising expedient in Western States, 135. the English family which should be selected for this purpose, 135,136. the cross should stop with the first one, 134. recapitulation, showing when crossing is expedient, and when inexpedient, 136-138. Crossing, (See Cross-breeding.) Cutaneous Diseases, unnamed ones, 344, 345. Cuts, 380. Cutting teeth, 150. Cystitis, 337. D'Arboval Hurtel cited in regard to dis eases of Sheep, 314, 849, 350. Darlington, Dr. his account of Si. John's wort, 269. Darwin, M., his account of South Ameri can sheep-dogs, 405. enton's directions fo Paubet i for bleeding sheep Delafond, Mr., on history of small pox, 349 Delessert, M., imports Merinos into United States, 22. Dewees, Dr., on proper treatment of preg nant iemales, 336. Diarrhea, 306-308, 380. in young lambs, 151. Dickens, Mr., cited in regard to diseases o sheep, a37. Dick, Professor, on hoof-rot, 358 note. Diseases and wounds of Sheep, 261, et seq comparatively small number of in Uni ted States, 261, 262. low type of American sheep diseases Abortion, 329. Abscess, 382. Apoplexy, 280. Biftex Canal, disease of 354. Blain, 291, 292. Braxy, or inflammation of the bowels 311. Bronchitis, 326. Bruises and Strains, 382. Catarrh, 268, 318, 319. Catarrh, malignant epizootic, 319-324. Choking, 292, 293. Cold (see Catarrh.) Colic, 310. Constipation. 221, 228, 310. Constipation in young lambs, 149, 15( Consumption, 3",>7, 328, 379. iseases and wounds of Sheep, Costive- ness, (see Constipation.) Cutaneous diseases, unnamed ones, 344,345. Cuts. 380. Cystitis, (see Inflammation of the bladder.) Diarrhea, 306-308, 380. Diarrhea in young lambs, 151. Distemper, the, 324. Dog Bites, 381. Dropsy, acute, or Red Water, 304. Dysentery, 308-310, 379, 380. Enteritis, 306. Epizootic of 1846-47, 319 etseq. Eye, inflammation of, 272. •Fever, 316. Fever, inflammatory, 316, 317. Fever, malignant inflammatory, 317, 318. Fever, parturient, 331-337. Fever, puerperal. 331-337. Fever, typhus, 318. Foot-rot— (see Hoof-Rot.) Fouls, 356. Fractures, 354. Garget, 157, 330. Gravel, 355. Grub in the head, 273, 277. Goitre, congenital, 152, 154. Head, Grub in, 273-277. Hereditary diseases. 379, 380- Hoof -Rot, 356-371,381. Hoove. 209-301. Hydatid on the Brain, 277-279, 380. Ignis Saccr. 344. Inflammation of cellular tissue under the tongue— (see Blaiu.) Inflammation of the bladder. 337. Inflammation of the brain, 281. Inflammation of the coats of the in- testines. 306. Inflammation of the Eye 272. Inflammation of the lungs,. (see Pneu- monia.) Inflammation of the udder, (see Gar- get.) Inversion of the womb, 145 , 330. La Clavelee, (see Small-pox.) Lameness, 355, 356. Madness, (see Rabies.) Obstructions of the gullet, 292, 293. Opthalmia, 272, 279. Palsy, 283. Parturient fever, 331-337. Phthisis, (see Consumption.) Pining, 312. Pinning, 151. Pleurisy, (see Plenritis.) Pleuritis, 326, 327. Pneumonia, 325, 379. Poisons, 301, 302. Puerperal fever, 331-337. Rabies, 283-290. Rheumatism. 155, 156, 379. Rot, the 372-378. Rot, cut of the Fluke, 374. Scab, erysipelatous 344. Scab, the 338, 343. 445 Diseases and wounds of Sheep, Scours (see Ely, David, his " little - eared " sheep, 104. Diarrhea.) Scrofula, 378, 380. Small-pox, 345-353. Sore Pace, 269-271. Spruins, 382. Stretches, 310. Swelled Head, 268. Swelled Lips, 271. Swelled Neck, 152, 154, 380. Teeth, cutting of the 150. Tetanus, or Locked-Jaw, 281, 282. Variola Ovina— (see Small-pox.) Water on the brain, 279. 280. Wild Fire, 344. Worms, 312. Wounds, 380-382 Wounds, lacerated and contused, 381. Wounds, poisoned, 381, 382. Wounds, punctured, 381. Disowning Lambs, 158, 159. Distemper, the, 324. Docking Lambs, 160, 161. Dog, bites of the, 381. the dog, in connection with sheepi 393, et seq. injuries inflicted by, on sheep, 393-3%. sheep dog described by Buffon, 396. Spanish, 397. Hungarian, 400. French, 401. Mexican, 401-405. South American, 405, 406. other large races, 406. English, or drover's, 407. Scotch, or Colley, 408-410. mongrel Colley, a sheep killer, 410. accustoming the sheep to the dog, 411. Down Sheep, (see South Downs, Hamp- shire Downs, Shropshire Downs and Oxfordshire Downs.) Drafting and selection, in flocks, 179. Dropsy, acute, 304. Drying off ewes, 158. Dun, Finlay, on hereditary diseases, 379, 380. Dunn, Christopher, origin of his Leicester flock, 44. character of his flock, 44 note, crosses it with Cotswold rams, 48. Dunglison's Medical Dictionary, cited pas- sim. Dupont de Nemours, imports Merinos into United States, 22. Dysentery, 308-310, 379, 380. E Elithorp, Prosper, length of his Merino wool, 76. crosses the Paular and Infantado sheep, 128 note. his remedy for stretches, 310. his connection with the origin of the improved Paular family, 417-419. furnishes an account of origin of, 419. Ellman, Mr., his success inbreeding South Down sheep, 55 et seq. followed in-and-in breeding, 119. it was an element of his success, 122. English Breeders, their great skill in breeding mutton sheep, 132 note. Enteritis, 306 tic among sheep in 1846-17, 319, et seq. the lamb epizootic of 1862, 154, 226. the term defined, 226 note. Escurial Merino, 14. Ewe, influence of on progeny, 110. fall feed and shelter necessary for, 202- 205. effect of neglect in this particular, 203, 204. " hunger rot " described, 203, 204. subject to other diseases when in low condition, 204. does not take the ram uniformly when poor, 205. selection of for the ram, 205, 206. coupling with the ram, modes of, 206, period of gestation in, 207. want of sagacity in protecting its young, 213. injurious eflects of close confinement on, 222, et seq. should not be confined to dry feed in winter, 222, et seq. its prolificacy affected thereby, 222 et seq. Exercise important for pregnant ewes, 223, Experiments in fattening sheep, 418- 425. Eye, inflammation of, 272. Face, sore, 269-271. Fall management of sheep, (s ment of sheep in fall). Fat-Rumped sheep introduced into the United States, 53. i Fattening Sheep, 418-425. Fay, Richard S.. imports Shropshire sheep into United States, 66. character of his sheep, 66, 67. Feed, different values of, for fattening, 420- ^.:periments in mixing, 419 et seq. Feeds for sheep— (see Fodder.) Feeding sheep, _Mr. Pawlett's experiments Felting 'property of wool, how produced, Fences for sheep, value of different, 233, 245. Fever, 316. inflammatory, 316, 317. malignant inflammatory, 317, 318. typhus, 318. parturient, 331-337. puerperal, (see fever parturient). Fischer, Ferdinand, established the family of Merinos, now termed Silesian m the United States, 39. Fischer Louis, son of preceding, continues the flock, 39. 446 INDEX. Fischer, Louis, effect of his cross between the Negretti and Infantado, 128, 129. Fleece, proper characteristics of in a Me- rino, 71, 72. Fleischmann, Charles L., his drawing of a Saxon ram, 26. his statements about German cross- bred sheep, 127. his drawings of marking instruments, 184. Fodder for sheep, value of different, 233- Folds, or wrinkles, proper amount in the skin of the Merino, 70, 71. Forshey, Caleb G., on the climatology of Guillaum Texas, 428 et seq. G ~ Foster, William, first introduced Merinos Q into United States, 22. Foot -Rot, (see Hoof -Hot.) Fouls, 356. Fractures, 254. Grove, Henry D., his account of importa- tions of Saxon sheep, 25. weight of fleeces of his Saxon flock, 25 note, his account of origin of the " little eared " sheep, 104. Grognier, Prof., his account of French sheep dogs, 401. Grub in the head, 273-277. Guillaume inoculates for small-pox, 349. Gullet, obstructions of, 292, 293. um on wool — (see Yolk.) Gad - fly of the sheep, cut of, 274. cut of Larvae of, 274. their effect on sheep, (see Grub in the Head.) Garget, 157. Gayot, inoculates for small -pox, 350. Gasparin, cited in regard to sheep diseases, Gaudeloupe Merino, 14. Geddes, James, cut of his Silesian Merino ram "Carl," 38. cut of his improved wool - press, 174. Geddes, Hon. George, experiments in feed- ing beets to sheep, 243. Germany, Breeders of, at World's Fair, 438, 439. Gestation, period of in the ewe, 207. Gilbert, his description of the origin of " ~ ' nillel " * '" the Rambouillet flock, 19. Girard, inoculates for small -pox, 349. Goitre, congenital, 152, 154. Gold Drop, Mr. Hammond's ram, pedigree of, 121, 122. Goodale, 8. L., his work on the principles of breeding, 114 note, 123. Gossip, George H. and Brother, import Lincoln sheep into the U. States, 50. Gragnier inoculates for small pox, 349. Grasses, most valuable ones for sheep, 233, H Gravel, 355. Grease in wool — (see Yolk.) Greaves, Mr. W., cited in regard to sheep diseases, 305. Greer, W. F., in regard to hoof-rot, 371. Grennel, James S., his report on sheep husbandry to the Massachusetts State Board of Agriculture, 51. his account of New Oxfordshire 51. his statement of comparative waste in cooking beef and mutton, 83. his statement of increase of bought in Boston market betwee 1839 and 1859, 84. his account of sheep poisons Grinnel, J. B., his statement of cost of get- ting wool and other products to mar- ket from Iowa, 251 note. prairie f 260. his article on prairie sheep husbandry, Hammond, Edwin, commences his flock with Infantado or Atwood sheep, 29, the great improver of the Infantados, present character of his flock, 29, 30. his ram Sweepstakes — (the frontis- piece of this volume,) 29. length of Sweepstakes' wool, 76. pedigree of Sweepstakes, 121. description of Sweepstakes, 413. the points which Mr. H. has bred for, 30. the extent of his in - and - in breed- ing, 30, 120. pedigrees of his leading stock rams and ewes, 14, 122. in - and - in breeding a lever of his suc- cess, 122. plan of his sheep establishment, 218. description of his leading animals, and course of breeding, 412-416. Hampshire Downs described by Professor Wilson, 59, 60. Mr. Spooner's account of their origin and blood, 60, 61. Handling Sheep— (see Catching and Hand- Harrison, Dr., on symptoms of rot, 372. Head, grub in, 273-277- swelled, 268. :rding, capacity for in different breeds of sh iheep, 89. Hereditary Diseases, 379, 380. Hogg, James, cited in regard to diseases of sheep, 268, 278, 291, 312, 364. Hoof-Rot, 356-371, 380. Hoofs, shortening of the, 168, 169. cut of toe-nippers, 169. Hoove, 299-301. [lorns on sheep, shortening, etc., 189. sheep, Howard, Charles, describes origin of Shropshire Downs, 63. 64. Howard, Sanford, imports Cheviot sheep, sheep Huard inoculates for small-pox, 349. Humphreys, David, imports Merinos into the United States, ates, 23. breeds in-and-in, 120. IKDEX. 447 rICkh0nt9flocksSof Spain^Te."169 ** *° ****'*' -John -H:' "s. statement of the prese: r , " Hunger-Rot," how produced, 203, 204. Hydatid on the brain, 277-279, 380. Hyde, Professor, his dissections of sheep In-and-in breeding — (see breeding in-and Ignis Sacer, 344. Illinois, sheep husbandry in, 248, et seq. Infantado Merinos in Spain, 14. the improved Infantados of the United States, 28, et seq. closely bred in-and-in in the United States. 120. one of the families on which the Amer ican Silesian are based, 129. leading animals of the improved fam- Lan ily, 412-116. Inflammation of the eye, 272. of the brain, 281. of cellular tissue under the tongue, (see Blain.) of coats of intestines, 306. of the bowels, 311. of the lungs, 325. of the bronchial tubes, 326. of the udder, 157, 330. of the bladder, 337. Injections, 150. Inoculation for small-pox, 349, et seq. Iowa, starting a aheep establishment in, 427, 428. International Exhibition at Hamburg, 438. triumph of American Merinos at, 438, 439. Inverted womb, how treated, 145. Jarvis, William, imports Merinos into the United States, 23, 24. crosses them with the Saxons, 24. breeds back, but crosses his Merino families, 24. weight of his fleeces and prices of his wool, 24. his Merinos established as a family, 27. his sheep described, 27. effect of his crossing different fami- lies, 128. his remedy for hoof-rot, 363. his family crossed with the Improved Paulars, 417, 418. John's-wort — (see St. John's-wort.) Kendall, George Wilkins, the wintering of his sheep in 1860, 89. his successful cross between Merinos and Mexican sheep, 126 note, mean temperature near his residence, 249 note, his account of Mexican sheep dogs, 404. 8tSJ»MiF* """* by doss iu La Clavelee — (see small-pox.) Lambs, management and diseases of in spnng — (see Spring Management.) importance of fall shelter for, 201. Lambing, proper time for, 142. proper place for, 143. mechanical assistance in, 144. administering cordials, etc., during, Lameness from traveling — (see Travel Sore.) . Langlois inoculates for small-pox, 349. Lasteyrie, his description of the Merino families, 14. his account of the weight of French Merino fleeces, 19. Lax, Mr., imports Leicester sheep into the United States, 44. Leicester sheep, 43. probably introduced into United States by Gen. Washington, 44. imported by Mr. Lax, 44. imported by Capt. Beanes, 44. cut of Messrs. Campbell & Brodie's ram, 45. cut of one of their ewes, 47. Prof. Wilson's description of the Lei- cesters, 45-47. their origin, 45. Mr. Bakewell selected from different families, 46. he then bred in -and -in, 46. not so hardy as the other large breeds, their early maturity, 46. now improved by a dip of Cotswold blood, 47, 133. Lieonesa, the best Spanish families of the Merino, so called, 14. uewis, Dr., statement regarding Spanish sheep dogs , 399. incolnshire sheep imported into the United States by Leonard D. Clift, 50. imported by Geo. H. Gossip & Brother, 50. character of the imported sheep, 50. Lips, swelled, 271. * 'vermore, George, table of wool prices furnished by him, 92-94. Livingston, Robert R., states weight of Spanish fleeces, 16. imports Merinos into United States, 22. character of their descendants, 23. weight of his Merino fleeces, 23. cited in regard to diseases, 340, 341. on proportion of wool to surface, 433. Locked -jaw, 281, 282. Longevity of different breeds, 113. Loveland, R. A., his account of starting a sheep establishment in the new Western States, 427, 42&. 448 Lyman. J. H., his account of Mexican sheep dogs, 401-404. M Madness— (see Rabies.) Maggots on sheep, how destroyed, 189, 190. Management of sheep in spring, 139. catching and handling, 139-141. tagging, 141, 142. burs in pastures to be eradicated, 142. lambing, 142, 143. proper place for lambing, 143, 144. mechanical assistance in lambing, 144, 145. inverted womb, how treated, 145, 146. management of new-born lambs, 146. artificial feeding of lambs, 146-148. chilled lambs, 148, 149. constipation or costiveness of lambs how treated, 149, 150. cutting teeth, 150. pinning, how treated, 151. diarrhea or purging of lambs, how treated. 151. congenital goitre, or swelled neck. 152- imperfectly developed lambs, 154, 155 rheumatism in lambs. 155. 156. Management of sheep in summer, 163-197. cut of ears tattooed. 184. cut of copper ear marks, 185. storms after shearing, 186. sun-scald, 186. ticks, how destroyed, 187-189. cut of dipping box, 187. shortening horns, etc., 189. maggots, 189, 190. confining rams, 190, 191. training rams, 191. fences, care of, 192. salt necessary for sheep, 192. tar, sulphur, alum, etc., for sheep, 193. water in pastures, 194. shade in pastures, 195. housing sheep in summer, 195. pampering sheep, 1%, 197. Management of sheep in the fall, 197-210. weaning and fall feeding lambs, 197- 201. sheltering lambs in fall, 201. fall feeding and sheltering breeding ewes, 202-205. selecting ewes for the ram, 205, 206. coupling. 206, 207. period of gestation, 207. management of rams during coupling, 207, 209. dividing flocks for winter, 209, 210. treatment of ewe after lambing, 156,, 157. 'Management of sheep in winter, 210-247. closed teats, 157. I winter shelter, 211. inflamed udder, 157. drying off ewes, 158. disowning lambs, 158, 159. pens, 159. foster lambs, 159, 160. docking lambs, 160, 161. castration of lambs, 161. Management of sheep in summer, 163-197. modes of washing sheep, 163, 164. utility of washing sheep, 163, 168. shortening the hoof, 168, 169. cut of toe-nippers, 169. time between washing and shearing, 170. shearing, 170-172. stubble shearing and trimming, 172. shearing lambs and shearing sheep semi-annually, 172. doing up wool, 173-175. cut of folding table, 173. cut of fleece ready for press, 173. cut of fleece in press, 174. at of wool-press, 174. storing wool, 176. place for selling wool, 177. wool depots and commission stores, 177. sacking wool, 177. drafting and selection of flock, 179. registration, 180. marking and numbering, 182-186. Von Thaer's mode of, 183. German mode of tattooing, 183. a third mode of marking, 184. a fourth mode of marking, 185. cut of instruments for tattooing, 184. frauds in doing up wool, 175. temporary sheds, 211. cut of shed of poles, 211. clumps of trees and stalls, 212. hay barns with open sheds, 212. sheep barns or stables, 214, 219. cut of sheep barn and yards, 217. cut of a sheep establishment, 218. cleaning out stables in winter, 219. yards, how arranged, etc., 220. littering yards, 220. confining sheep in yards and to dry feed, 221-228. hay racks, 229. cut of slatted box rack, 229. cut of wall rack and trough, 230. cut of end view of wall rack and trough, 231. water for sheep in winter, 232. amount of food consumed by sheep in winter. 233. value of different fodders, 233, 243. nutritive equivalents, 234. table of nutritive equivalents, 235. proportion in which different nutri- ment increases live weight, wool and tallow, 236, 238. cost and economy of the different kinds of, 238, et seq. experiments in feeding, 239-242. mixed feeds, 243-245. fattening sheep in winter, 245, 246. regularity in feeding, 246, 247. Salt in winter, 247. Management of Sheep on Prairies— (see Prairie Sheep Husbandry.) Markets, influence of, in determining the selection of a breed, 82. 449 Marking and numbering sheep, differen modes of, 183-186. Marshall, Gen. O. F., his mode of salting sheep in winter, 247. Marshes, access to not dangerous to sheep in Northern States, 88,— (see Salt Marshes.) Mauchamp Merinos in France, 104. Meat and Wool, proportion of, betwe sheep of different ages and sex 433 et seq. Medicines, mode of introducing into the stomach of sheep, 299. explanation of medical terms used, 343. list of medicines used in diseases ol Merino, American, introduced into United States, 22. little noticed before 1807, 24. prices of wool from 1807 to 1824, 24. prices of sheep from 1807 to 1815, 24. circumstances affecting prices of wo 24. established as a variety in United States, 27. the mixed Leonese or Jarvis family 27,28. the Infantado or Atwood family, 28. Mr. Hammond, founder of the im proved Infantados, 29, 30. the improved Paular or Eich family. 30-33. other American Merino families, 33. prices of, in winter of 1862-63, 69 note, proper form and size of, 69. the different families should not be merged, 69, 70, proper qualities of skin of, 70. proper amount of folds or wrinkles, 70. characteristics to be sought in the fleece, 71, 72. spotted and black Merinos, etc., 72 note, the most profitable quality of wool and breed of sheep to propagate, 72, 73. evenness of the fleece, 73. trueness and soundness of wool, 74. pliancy and softness of wool, 74. style of wool, 75. length of wool, 75, 76. endures extremes of weather better than any other valuable breed, 86. is a better working sheep than the English, 87. effect of abundant food on, 88. will not endure wet soils, 88, the great capacity of, for herding, 89. average production of wool per head in large flocks, 98. annual value of manure of, 99. its manure far more valuable than that of the horse or cow, 99 note, annual value of lambs, 99. comparative profits of, in different parts of the United States, 99. full bloods as cheaply raised as grades, profits of growing oa lands worth $50 per acre, 100. Merino, American, breeding in-and-in of the improved Infantados, 120. pedigrees of celebrated improved In- fantados, 121, 122. origin of the improved Paulars, 128 note. effect of crossing American Merinos with coarse breeds — (see Cross- Breeding.) effect of crossing different families of Merino3-(see Cross-Breeding.) origin of improved Infantados, 412- leading early animals of Mr. Ham- mond's flock, 412-416. origin of improved Panlars, 416-418. leading early animals of the family, victorious at World's Fair at Ham- burg, 438. Merino, French, origin of, 18, 19. stock from which the RambouiUet flock sprung, 19. weight of fleece given by Lasteyrie, etc., 19, 20. general description of, by Trimmer, in 1827, 19. introduced into the United States by D. C. Collins, 35. A. B. Allen, description of them, 35. imported by John A. Taintor, 36. weight of fleeces of this family, given by J. D. Patterson, 36. character of the variety, 36, 37. crossed with American Merinos, 129. Merino, Saxon, origin of, 20. management of. in Germany, 20. its characteristics of carcass and fleece, 20. introduced into United States in 1824, 25. circumstances affecting its success in United States, 25, 26. supercedes the Spanish, and in turn superceded by them, 25. cut of Von Thaer's Saxon ram. 26- Merino, Silesian, introduced into the United States, 39. description of them by Mr. Chamber- lain, 39-42. cut of a group of Mr. Chamberlain's ewes, 41. have been closely bred in-and-in, 120. effect of the original cross from which the family was established, 128, 129. Merino, Spanish, origin of, 13, 125 note. provincial varieties of, in Spain, 13. cabanas, or families of, in Spain, 13, 14. migrations of, in Spain, 13. general treatment of, in Spain, and effects, 13, 14. its wool, character and color, 15, 16. its wool, compared with that of Ameri- can Merino, 15. fineness and felting properties of its wool, 16. cut illustrating appearance of wool, 16. best families of, lost to Spain, 16, 17. the character of the present flocks of Spain, 17, la 450 INDEX. Merino, Spanish, the earlier families intro- duced into the United States by dif- ferent persons, 22, 23. black ones imported, 23. the different families bred in-and-in, 119, 120. Messenger, Thos., imports Hampshire Downs into the United States, 61. Miguel inoculates for small pox, 350. Miller, George, imports Shropshires into Canada West, 65. Mississippi, sheep husbandry in, 248 et seq. Mixed feeds for sheep, 243-245. Morrell, L. A., author of American Shep- herd, 269. cited in regard to sheep diseases, 209, 301, 811. Myrtle & Ackerson, length of their Me rino wool, 76. N Nankin sheep in the United States, 54. Native sheep of the United States, 43. Neck, swellings of, 152, 154, 380. Needham, Col. Daniel, attends World's Fair poi as Commissioner of Vermont, 438. challenges the breeders of Europe, 438. Negretti Merinos, 14, 129. weight of fleeces of flock of King of England, 16. Nelson, Capt. Allison, his acconnt of Mex ican sheep dogs, 405. New Oxfordshire sheep imported into the United States, 51. described by L. Smith, a breeder of them, 51. Nomadic shepherds on the prairies, 250. Numann, Prof. A., on treatment of small pox, 348, 349. Nutritive equivalents in sheep feed, 334 et seq. table of nutritive equivalents, 5 Parturient fever, 831-337. 'atterson, John D., describes French Me- rinos, 36. Paular Merinos, 14. improved in United States, 32, 33, 119. Pawlett, T. E., his essay on management of sheep, 199. his views on fall feeding of lambs, 199. his experiments in winter feeding, 418-425. Pea-haulm as sheep feed, 235, 245. r'edigree, mode of keeping, 121. Persian sheep in United States, 54. "'eters, Theodore O., opens a Wool Depot in 1847, 177. his letter in regard to sheep diseases, 262. his account of sheep dogs, 407, 409. 'etri, his measurements, etc., of Spanish sheep, 14. ining, 312. Pinning, 151. of young lambs, how treated, 151. Pleurisy, 326, 327. Plenritis, 326, 327. Pneumonia, 325, 379. Poisons, 301, 302. Porter, Commodore, imports Broad-Tailed sheep into United States, 53. Powell, John Hare, breeds Tunisian Mountain sheep, 53. imports South Downs into United States, 57. his acconnt of Spanish sheep dogs, 400. Prairie Sheep Husbandry, 248-260. .rative climate of Prairie States, 0 Ohio, destruction of sheep in, by dogs, 393 396. Oil in wool— (see Yolk.) Old Kobinson Ram, his history and quali ties, 113. his pedigree, 128 note, his pedigree and qualities, 416-418. Opthalmia, 272, 379. Orton, Mr., his theory of breeding, 107 e seq. Otter sheep, 43. Oxfordshire Downs, described by Mr Howard, 65. introduced into United States, 66. description of Mr. Fay's sheep, 66, 67. Paget, Mr., his account of Hungarian Pampering sheep, effects of, 196, 197. ' great advantages for wool growing in, 249. nomadic shepherds in, 250. acclimation of sheep in, 250. profits of wool growing in, over East- ern States, 251. wool the most profitable staple in, 251 and note. management of sheep in summer in, 252 lambing in prairie flocks, 252, 253. folds and dogs, 253. stables, 253. herding, 254. washing, 254. storing and selling wool, 254. ticks on sheep, 255. prairie diseases, 255, 256. feeding salt, 256. weaning lambs, 256. prairie management in winter, 256. winter feed, 258, 259. sheds or stables, 259. water, 260. location of sheep establishment, 260. Pregnancy, proper treatment during, 221- 228, 336. Price, Mr., cited in regard to sheep dis- eases, 262. Puerperal Fever— (see Parturient Fever.) Pulse, its frequency in healthy sheep, 314. where it is felt, 314. Purging— (see Diarrhea, Dysentery.) INDEX. 451 Rabies, 283, 290. Racks for feeding sheep, 299-231. cut of slatted box rack, 229. cut of wall racks, 230. cut of end view of same, 231. Ram, influence of, in breeding, 108-115. oftenest gives the form to progeny, 109 points to be regarded in, 111, 112. capacity of, to procreate, 113, 209. proper size of, 114. horns of, require attention, 189. confinement of, 190. training of, 191. treatment of, when vicious, 191. selecting ewes for, 205. modes of coupling, 206, 207. during couPlinS> 207- Saxto causes which sometimes render them unsure stock-getters, 207 and note. when they require mechanical assist ance, 207 note. preparation of, for coupling season feed inclosures, etc., 208. Reaumur's experiments, showing how feeds increase animal products, 236, Red Water, 304. Registration of sheep, 180-182. form of a register, 181. Regularity in feeding, importance of, 246, 247. Remelee, Loyal C., crosses the Paular and Infantado sheep, 128 note. his connection with the origin of the improved Paular, 417. Rhcumalism, 155, 156, 379. in lambs, 155, 156. Rich, Charles, origin of his Paular flock o Merinos, 30-33. John T. succeeds to the flock of his father, 31. Messrs. John T. and Virtnlan, succeed to the flock of John T. Rich, Sen., 31, the course of breeding and character of the Rich flock, 32, 33, 119. cut of a ewe bred by the Messrs, Rich, effect of a dip of other blood on the flock, 128 and note. Rickets, the 380. Rives, William C., imports Shropshire sheep into United States, 66- Robinson, Erastus, breeds the " Old Rob- inson Ram," 128 note, originates the " Robinson Sheep " of Vermont, 128 note, his connection with the origin of the improved Panlars, 416, 418. Robinson Ram, the old, his pedigree, 416- 418. Roots, value of, for fattening sheep, 418, el Rot, the? 372-378. Rotch, Francis, Ms flock of early American Merinos, 33. cut of one of his ewes, illustrating those early Merinos, 34. imports South Downs into the United States, 57. his account of a Spanish Sheep Dog, Sacking wool, 177. Salt marshes healthy for sheep, 88. Salt necessary to sheep in summer, 192. necessary in winter, 247. Sanford, William R, his account of tho present Merinos in Spain, 18. his remedy for stretches, 310. his purchases of sheep, 412, 414. n, Nelson A., his remedy for stretches, Scab, the, 338-343. cut of the acarus, 339. erysipelatous, 344. Scotch Black -faced sheep— (see Black - Scotch sheep ) Scours — (see Diarrhea.) Scrofula, 378, 380. Seaman, Isaac, his prize essay on parturi- ent fever, 331, 335. Selection— (see Drafting and Selection.) Shade in pastures of much utility, 212. stubble shearing and trimming, 172. shearing lambs and shearing sheep semi-annually, 172. Sheds temporary and permanent, for sheep, 211-214. Sheep, the most profitable animals to de- pasture our cheap lands, 96. necessary to good farming on grain farms, 96. more profitable than dairy cows in por- tions of New York, 97. the best cleaners of new lands, 97. best adapted to the pecuniary means of a portion of our rural population, 97. their management simple and easily learned, 97. they never die in debt to man, 97. catching and handling, mode of, 139- turning out to grass, 141. taking, how performed, 141. cut illustrative of tagging, 141. necessity of eradicating burs from pastures, 142. lambing time, place for and assistance in, 142-144. spring management of, 139-162. summer management of, 163-197. administering medicines to when in health, 193. housing of in summer, 195. pampering of, 196. fall management of, 198-210. former mode of fall feeding, 202, 203. 452 INDEX. Sheep, dividing flocks for winter, 209. its want of providence in protecting its young, 213 and note. winter management of, 211-247. confinement to yards and dry feed, 221- 228. consumption of food by, in winter, 233. comparative value of different fodders for, 233-245, 418-425. the fattening of in winter, 245, 246. management of, on the prairies — (see So Prairie Sheep Husbandry.) their ready acclimation on the prairies, 250. their non-deterioration on prairies, 251. diseases of— (see Diseases of Sheep.) diseases of, comparatively few in the United States, 261, 262. diseases of a low type in the United States, 2(52,263. anatomy— (see Anatomy of Sheep.) longevity of, 268. mode of administering medicines to, 299. medicines used in diseases of, 384-392. destruction by dogs, 393-396. amount of food consumed by 418 etseq. Mr. Pawlet's experiments in fattening, 418-425. number of in United States; 426. proportion of wool to meat in, 433. Sheep Husbandry on the Prairies — (see Prairie Sheep Husbandry.) Shelters for sheep, 211, 219. Shropshire Downs, described by Professor Wilson, 61-63. Mr. Spooner's account of their origin, 63. Mr. Howard describes their origin and character, 63, 64. cut of Judge Chaffee's Shropshire ram Lion, 62. cut of Jud?e Chaffee's Shropshire ewe Nancy, 65. Judge ChafTee's description of his sheep, 65. Sibbald, W. C., on parturient fever. 337. Silesian Merinos— (see Merinos Silesian.) Simonds, Prof., his remedy for scab, 343. Skin, proper qualities of, in the Merino, 70 diseases of, unnamed ones, 344t 345. Small-pox, 345, 353. its introduction into America to be guarded against, 351, 352. Smith, Robert, his prize essay on Manage- ment of sheep, 198. his views in respect to fall lambs, 198, 199. his experiments in feeding sheep, 262. his remedy for diarrhea and dysentery 308,309. his remedy for scab, 342, 343. Soils, effect of low, flat, moist and very rich soils on sheep, 88. effect of light, sandy soils, 89. kind of, adapted to Merino and Down sheep, 89. Sore face, 269-271. Sotham, William H., his account of Mr. Dunn's wethers, 44. imports Cotswold sheep in 1840 with Mr. Corning, 48. th Downs, described by Professor Wil- son, 55-57. imported into the United States by Mr. Powell, 57. imported by Rotch, 57. imported by Mr. Thome, of New York, Mr. Alexander, of Kentucky, and Mr. Taylor, of New Jersey, 58. Mr. Thome describes his mode of man- his remedy for hoof -rot, 364, 365. Smith's Island sheep, 43. Soils to be regarded in selecting a breed of sheep, 88. . the loog-wooled sheep preferable on Sweet, H wet soils, 88. the Merino cannot endure wet soils, aging them, 58, 59. f Mr. Th 56- cut of , . ome's ram Archbishop, cut of two of his ewes, 57: annual value of manure in England, Spooner', William, describes the Cotswold sheep, 49. describes the improved Cheviots, 52, 53. describes origin and blood of Hamp- shire Downs, 60, 61. his account of the origin of the Shrop- shire sheep, 63. his estimate of the value of sheep manure, 98, 99. his theory of hereditary transmission, 107. cited in regard to diseases of sheep, 277, 280, 281, 300, 302, 304, 307, 311, 312; 326, 329, 330, 342, 347, S64, 370, 372, 378, 381, 382, 387, 390. Sprains, 382. Spring management of sheep, — (see Man- agement of sheep in spring. ) Stables for sheep, — (see Barns.) Stells for sheep, 212. Stevenson, Mr., cited in regard to diseases of sheep, 344. Stickney, Tyler, his connection with, the improved Paulars, 128 note, 417, 418. St. John's-Wort injurious to sheep, 269- 271. popular opinions respecting, 270. Stone, Frederick William, of Canada West, a distinguished breeder of Cotswold heep, 48, 49. after shearing, effect on sheep, 186. Strains, — (see Bruises and Strains.) Stretches, 310— (see Colic.) Straw, as sheep leed, 235, 236, 245. Summer management of sheep, — (see Management of sheep in summer.) Sun-Scald, how produced, 186. Swamps, effect of on sheep, — (see Marsh- es.) Sweepstakes, Mr. Hammond's ram, — (see Hammond, Edwin.) H. D. L., on comparative weight of ool and bodies of sheep, 433. elled Head, 368. feeding Storms aft 453 Swelled Lips, 271. Swelled Neck, 152, 154, 380. Tagging, how performed, 141. cut, illustrative of, 141. Taintor, John A., his account of preser Merinos of Spain, 17. imports French Merinos into United States, 36. description of his Merinos, 36. Tariffs of the United States, effects of dif- ferent ones on production, price, etc., of wool, 25, 26 those in force from 1824 to 1861, 93-94 Teats, closed ones, how opened, 157. Teeth, cutting of the, 150. described, 266. the most reliable test of age, 266, 267. to be extracted sometimes, 267. Tessier, cited in regard to sheep diseases 238, 318. Tetanus, 281, 282. Texas, adaptation of to wool growing, 248 et seq. climate of, 248, 249. mean temperature at New Braunfels, Udder, inflamed, 157, 330. opening closed teats, 157. t, Vaccination for small-pox, 350. Valois inoculates for small-pox, 349. Variola Ovina-(see Small Pox!) Vegetation, kind of, required by different breeds of sheep, 86, 87. Vermont, Merino sheep breeders of, 27-30. Von Thaer, Albert, cut of his Saxon ram, i at Austin, 249. mean temperature at climate of, 428, et seq. northers of, 429, 430. seasons and crops, and their vicissi tudes, 431, 432. Thomiere, inoculates for small-pox, 350. Thorne, Samuel, imports South Dowt sheep, 58. describes his mode of managing them, his crosses to procure lambs for the butcher, 134, 135 note, his account of parturient fever in his flock, 334, 335. Ticks, effects of on sheep, 187. how exterminated from flocks, 187-189 cut of dipping box, 187. Toe-nippers, cut of, 169. Torry, Dr., his account of St. John's- Wort Travel-sore, 355. Treatment of ewe after lambing, 156, 157. Trees in pastures, 212. Trimmer, Mr., his description of French Merinos in 1827, 19. his description of Spanish sheep dogs 399, 400 Tunisian Mountain sheep introduced into Pennsylvania, 53. bred and commended by John Hare Powell, 53. Turnips as sheep feed, 221, 235, 239-243. " 21 per cent.," the ram so called, 15. length of his wool, 76. his qualities as a sire, 109. remarkable cross between him an Saxon ewes, 130, and note, his pedigree, 415. his mode of numbering sheep, 183. W Walker, Mr., his theory of hereditary transmission, 107 et seq. Walz M., his description of scab, 388. Washing sheep, 163, 164. its utility considered, 164-168. Water for sheep, its utility in summer, 194. its necessity in winter, 231. modes of watering in winter, 231-233. Water in pastures highly beneficial, 194. indispensable in winter, 232. Weaning lambs, age and mode, 198. ng alter weaning, 198- English mode of fall-feeding, 198, 199. Webb, Jonas, his success in breeding South Down Sheep, 57 et seq. Wells, Thomas, describes symptoms of small-pox, 347. White, Henry G., imports Cotswold Sheep into United States, 49. cut of his Cotswold ram Pilgrim, 48. cut of his Cotswold ewe Lady Gay, 50. an account of his sheep, 49. Wilcox, Asahel F., pedigree of his " Thou- sand Dollar Ram,1' 415. Wild-fire, 344. Wilson, Professor John, his description of Leicester sheep, 45-17. his description of South Down Sheep, 55. his description of the Hampshire Downs, 59, 60, 61, 63. Womb, inversion of, 145, 330. Wool, characteristics of Spanish, 15. 16. fineness and felting property of Span- ish, 16. felting property of Saxon, 16. characteristics of Saxon fleeces, 20. proper degree of fineness of in the American Merino, 72, 73. that of the Merino sometimes black, 72 note. evenness of, the term defined, 73. trueness and soundness of, 74. pliancy and softness of, 74. style of, 75. length of, 75. yolk in (see Yolk.) oil, grease, and gum in, (see Yolk.) prices of in United States from 1800 to 1861, 91-94. 454 INDEX. Wool, table of average quarterly prices from 1834 to 1861, 93-94. prices medium have never sunk below cost of production, 94. prices have been generally remunera- annual exports and imports of from Wright 1840 to 1861, 95, 96. the domestic supply has never met the demand, 96. cost of producing in New York and New England, 97. cost of producing in the South and Wright, G South-west, 98. cost of producing in the Western and North-western States, 98. cost of producing in intermediate situ- ations, 98. Wounds, lacerated and contused -wounds 381. punctured wounds, 381. dog bites, 381. poisoned wounds, 381. Wright, Loyal C., his ram, 113. Wright, M. W. C., first crosses the Paular and Infantado Sheep in Vermont, 138 note, originates the Panlar and Infantado cross, 416. his statements, 418. ov., of Indiana, at World's Fair, Wrinkles", (see Folds.) average production of per head by Y: Merinos in large flocks, 98. comparative profit of producing i: different parts of the United States, 99. profits of producing on land worth $50 Yolk per acre, 100. washing of on the back, 163, 164. shearing, mode of, 170-172. doing up, mode of, 173-175. frauds in doing up, 175. storing wool, 176. place lor selling wool, 177. wool depots and commission stores 177. sacking wool, 177. cost of getting to market, 251. product of, in the United States in 1860, 426. proportion to meat in sheep of differen ages, sexes and sizes, 433 et seq. Woolens, exports and imports of, from 1840 to 1861, 95. Wooster, Abel J., describes the " Woost Ram," 113 note. Wooster Kam described, 113 and note. Worms, 312. Wounds, (see Diseases and Wounds.) rds for sheep (see Barns.) size, situation of, etc., 220. littering yards, 220. confining sheep to them in winter, 221 et seq. . described, 77. chemical analysis of, 77. uses of, in wool, 77. proper amount and consistency of, 78, 79. proper color of, 80, 81. artificial imitation of its color exter- nally, 81. artificial propagation and preservation of in fleece, 81. Youatt, William, discovers conformation of wool, 16. his testimony in favor of pure blood, 131 note. in rccard to sagacity and affection of sheep, 213. in regard to defects of the Merino, 223 note. cited in regard to diseases of sheep, 268, 374, 275, 278, 279, 380, 282, 283, 291, 300, 301, 306, 309, 314, 315, 317, 318, 326, 327, 329, 330, 336, 330, 340, 342, 344, 345, 347, 350, 354, 356, 357, 363, 364, 373, 385, 389. MANUAL OF FLAX AND HEMP CULUTURE. JUST PUBLISHED, A JVEW EDITION OF A MANUAL OF FLAX CULTURE AND MANUFACTURE: embracing Full Directions for Preparing the Ground, Sowing the Seed, Harvesting the Crop, Etc. Also comprising an Essay, by a Western Man, on HEMP AND FLAX IN THE WEST :— Amount Grown, Modes of Culture, Preparation for Market, &c., &c. With Botanical Descriptions and Illustrations. Tins work is composed of Nine Essays from the pens of Practical and Scientific Men who are well advised on the various branches of the subject (fiscussed. It comprises, in a neat and compact form, a large amount of valuable information, and is designed to enable new beginners to cultivate Flax and Hemp successfully. The leading Essay is by a gentleman who has had over thirty years experience in Flax Growing, and thoroughly understands the whole business. The Manual is published in handsome style, pamphlet form. Price only 25 cents — for which a copy will be sent to any point reached by the United States or Canada mails. Liberal discount to Agents and the Trade. Address D. ». T. MOORE, September, 1863. EDITOR RURAL NEW-YORKER, ROCHESTER, N. Y. osr TXXJH 2r»miss. FLAX AND HEMP.— A Manual of Flax Culture and Manufacture, embracing full directions for preparing the ground, sowing, harvesting, dressing, and manufacturing, with the process of making flax cotton, and also an essay upon hemp culture, has been published by D. D. T. MOORE, editor of the Rural New-Yorker, Rochester, in pam- phlet form at 25 cents, and is well worthy the attention of all who are embarking in flax culture. — New York Daily Tribune. THE CULTIVATION OF FLAX.— A Manual of Flax Culture and Manufacture, has been published in neat pamphlet form, at the office of Moore's Rural New- Yorker, and is on sale at the Bookstores generally, — price 25 cents. It is a work pretty exhaustive on the subject. The production of flax is a matter of increasing importance, and our agricultural friends should consult the new Manual. — Syracuse Daily Journal, MANUAL OP FLAX CULTURE.— * * * Those who wish to know all about Flax and Hemp Culture, and to aid in killing " King Cotton" and suspending traitors should remit the cost of the Manual — 25 cents —to D. D. T. MOORE, Rochester, N. Y. — Rochester Daily Democrat and American, MANUAL OF FLAX CULTURE.— We have received from the publisher, D. D. T. MOORE, Rochester, N. Y., Rural Manual, No. 1, being a collection of valuable infor- mation on the culture and manufacture of Flax and Hemp ; with illustrations. The wants of a large number of persons who are experimenting with these crops for the first time will be filled with this book. It can be had by addressing the publisher, inclosing 25 cents.— Prairie Farmer. MANUAL OF FLAX AND HEMP CULTURE.— We are pleased to learn that this valu- able little work is selling rapidly and widely. The publisher is daily receiving orders from various parts of the Loyal States and Canadas. Three editions have been pub- lished within as many weeks, and the demand is such that a fourth is now in press. Those desirous of obtaining reliable information on the culture of Flax and Hemp, and the preparation of their staples for market, should send 25 cents to D. D. T. MOORE, Rochester, for his Manual on the subject. — Rochester Daily Union