8 at Lah Wet Bae ha th Pane te Pre Bd Fhe (oI uo teh on pan nn ry rts » bookends the areal nil hiatatisine tied thle Titsintete Niche at ck aa ieeich odes alee aadientete tee ipa toot hendioatednaedndieetartioteiseteiemeiem one a Ti ett Ot In etna”. o ts 2 Loereerarise Ns ce ee eee oe ee ee Cees + PO din Motel ee dle The Pte ht hy Casitas Bort) 4 te LW oy Sra. $8. Se ae eS ae heey aaubederncapabesbetbetemid rine I ee rn oD ACM ATR Be IR te ODP ARI Se hte SA AAR A AMON tN ae ary SN Reign TPM RTA ay RT thar ert On Ate oh trea otien Seat AAR A el tte, BNA tae Ry Ar nec ate ene reer ere: ores nites h Mn trenbs ty Aub ston FE PR Rn tent Ge Be Si IP Bae Bh Lite dine Rte nid. eae Om Ate AM MPA HB orig my PI ce te amatrn Pas bo PP strom teri Pirate Prats fs AEP tra anlitg AAA east a e AA mig te Meme at ee Hate Nea hn Re eA 8 he Cea Arn Ragan Atel g Ain Asatte Nate ye he Atel Pac Py a i ri ABTS BAA ie Noi acted tee dM Oe nla bandh pitted rst” bin tre ttn. a ee ee ae adele pabaednsiantianial aca atin ten aimee ae be tai meat aeons A A ARR BBN Oy 2 0 RADE ANA ON yA II Ye Ay Mee 8 EM cr EN Pa LALO NS AO SAA Lae eS OG Bw Sn ale tin dealin tint oie Domes i mtn tn thee Gimfiahy 92 of A itebne tie © oan Fim lene eee te A Do ae inte etd hh «ge mires ie BOP AaB An Oe Mtn Oo Be 20 aN Aone ana I ate Emin dat my tet hve Rai. Ae og Re Sn Rete ee Ree ke rae et Bee Tae teem tme te ae sen Me rate afin hy Ded ronan a Stein 10 At LEE ee te a tte IOP mt Ng Rn tert @ Mn ODS 28, Mhad™ Pah oF Puen Bima Pim: Cartier ne Pree: ol mb Sales Ate ogy «ae em BS Ci eh at DEA a rm, I, TY AEN hits EIN Le id TMI IROL TAOS Ae Neg len hearin elie ayn heathen My Ratha eat Cs gE MONEE BRED re a EO ep NEE BR AEM HB 06. Bi Mg dhnds ipantnth won Ne Pra Kast een th FP reton rete (nls VPs oho 8. oh bathe be Ree P Fmttade Atm. on » moon pet detain Bans (Bt YE RFs ny A ate hl th a nln tes PB wih abn me ABN Anas "a Wh iti Mit thy italic ar RA AI Te ill alntbelie Me Wei bel ee eee ee a ee eee ee a Aart wAntortne a Do Patnthon, to aearwe “ F ° piey, heAeg eae cee oe PPMP LA Die MOI nat nthe Oda thine me Oe ON 0 ALAR OA DAA ALLER AR A PAR AE BBA Ray fem te ag Lote Bade bBMN ttn Pmt hon Mente na thtbnnty A RPO AIA Oa SOA oat APN AS ey. DN. Boh ens 4 A ANN aN he A MeN et Nl ThA A At OO Ret eee bp pear entareontr aor or andoerararer mates ae tne! Ph ines NEP oe Dh cine eS lm 0 witediss Kut one beth get 1 eB phn tind IM BR a saa On mes Monn eee Ripe Ne may hm Bah na Md enon Qa nin Anis Han 6 * AS NN Ae Ra an SMe a 1 Ahtarham tnaly wanti nants tee Salt tat 5am hades Pa aot AN Kar en Ne ali tn Ret Ran hate BM RRS a Ratna ee an a hes aprdiireekdhenanonates RP ret etree AE A. chat Ama ae thee cite dati 258i. Am Ay NA a Ra DN Mile Pa ND Ni POR DS AR PNM etic Meee i ty ee a ek ee neh NaN ase Sah ah wR Ait Rm AE tl ate pM Tee al eteertynh olson Oe ee Aneta te © a ere Rte. ne Peta as een Penden oem mab teo eb moon nt Ren be AD Oerd ya @- Sand ha Berl PAR Aon ae AS i oP Rls a me PAP duce ae Aten Sadan Mew dene de Se SiikaainiaBin iapda ei areas die ADA, a oy Atlin ty, 1s «ath arate Rng aegeteidomr stowage ys: “ Sere aaa coat a tanetarintaaeey gary eee eee ara e ere NE I ‘ i “~, er ex; BISA ah 68 Fate e intra i AiR eter tittle ela Rate npr Bn) mn nate owe Se ee ee ee ey eee in a Males come, Re ee A ee AES RY 0A OM ON Ae Nine eee mines ys Men Selene all ~ eh NN Ih IO IE tn athe On ol ta ag ere PN te tl arin nn ee oa allay Mayen My Hes pat tal lh, ety me ae me ois oo ception feo Aumeo mat hare tee dn Seinen ask aoe wat RF ph hal een eh Bomnad Pp ie ere Ae Rao tn a A RNA HD min Rs neueeeay a cdot 2 eta tht A meg Ale alan Sea Neth Qa ty tinw Sawa the 2 ville thee Ante Naa och Seta etait: . | gamer Ania La bpeMele hgh Aeoned. Os no Bt ean, Fiat in Bes rae PERM eatin Renn 0) Matnate IP oh Bem PRS ot hae IMs Bia hae RD ees, Petit rade Ani, ye ae a as : PME SP Beda Meith Pee Br tte fase eto cla wee EO heat ob MA Poh n teh d cine ol tata. Coats abecmmd ie A P ipa ies © aC Aatath ete, Aber 8 : Oh Rah ali . OA as Rate tet en Ee ee a NO Ray Pee ble Seltashaheteetienl a Hetil ta aa ae teed ets aetna ate ae ee Pe cs eth P mn rs ; 4, ce, a, rs in NPG Satin hen EE te re tet ate) arb Sat it ad IM. etter on, a a a eee St are 8 Rn pet wiht A a Ra i Se ete teen tet, aud eR, Gore — | tere resi Sea rte Bele Bees te Ei Pater e A oe SsdveicngtlieTeicadel detaendetaoncit aan et aa eee er ele eee a er eee Oe oe ea ee oe Hi tay ee ie i eae hh aide areetinindinn ardeabiatare oe aka ee ee eae er renee Sewer ee See nes a ears nti att Rance ‘ap petignit Rs Wed nl (Atiets emmaiiec me " a mete 2 LB Birr tow Oa PO monet 0 Pn + PratW die i ery b chy beh ght ebiets, © “8A Pel tees BY Renate tpg hd ARRAN AIAN Te mah nhs thy OL Tyo ARN Ny tae hl wk ie mek pat me ie SO NAT aR A Aa NIMS A nectans wt baectatt Reve pcokem mah me -menk oa, 4 yfesrenis nm nt on come ian Renter eee PD AL a a eet TS eh, eel fain CoG ats singe the CB Mate Lin psn tm te A MAD Pride Bin 068 han Bn Vi bee. Pete Fn mths thyin nediye Man taal! Ain Ee Pe Bite te natn Pal LP pene treed dD denims DAN In A bea Patna wa. (Nn amet a thintin Ken to 4 IN HR ate wk pichpee-idanharaibtniinaindnhe thar tertarhetaermemiinatateia tepiameaiete Deter Oe a acca iabaen prec nna tgs 9 ali pat mit te Pago Siaempcteensenadadebsiaene tat FRO, Retin ™ Rnikn O PNA ht NM Ndnl aidiridin inane tel ete ae aor a ee Pee eee oye Re PNR eke ae Tete Te ah RAG Ln Se eat pei are MeiS Dehe te Ren. Beg ny Rh, Aaine Remagtes wR beh sane" a Ceyenarers =~ = on ee OO OP. a A Nn Lin Sin tie 20 tear Peg 5+ Sat TaD gk on ge § Srl) ASB bo tae BS Pte mnt a te bs Pie at tetany cs i Sik PI othe Oe a Eo tach Reh eA ey A pd Rl nny hank Retr te ERG eA Tine Balt NO Ao A OM Sens ke a Ge Salen tthe Meat easing aac Bement : aithas Pape Blne™ ws Pm re “ - Poher gan Sears : Or PRA Bee td ODORS EG Ned fon tains outa » 0 ge Be Ppt arentiaoaD Paige? hn ae © ated ae ah 6 Ral eed hdc kid iP, ae a a nee Sos ign SO AN en te MO en Ren wire Pah haa Ant AT rh NG AT Nir NS Re he aha m9 Meanie A Ty ola Ne gta tet a ea a = pate em PB ive R= > Lee BaRlr Paton fae init Ne PW bh eitha Im bt” int Boe LADO PIR ned dm 6 a oe, snide. haegl Pine nn Bp. Oe ET Sees ee, Oe ma pe =p neni sas Cate Gh Rape athe tea Selthe Ds ohn 8 Pe Ahan ah mag ag RTL Re Mre th atean arene ce oe tone ta tana he SPH dete a te Bet ey ee oo arenes ne enn TAB tp ann mnt AP: Ee me Ne Reon oth ak Mom eeicd cas 1 1 oF oe dk it, tS aN de Minh el SP POD OBA Poe ete IR Dh ek ET A PL eT OA UA ye etadeem meh Km e crore ac bee tennanotelamaiehs aneieen eieiemiietianal ts Abbie cioete oiceeabdebintets ts on ate tal aoe ae ole eee ananeananaain abana ab enaetin entnhe nb ae meio wedge west ae ee a ne AeA: Som nym th eas Distie bans end ad 4 aide Pes aD tentac nnabch abe ed Papnee pea 7 Latina nepal RA a Mn nek NC AeA eM SMe tN Mae ARMAS ET WM ft MM Tin HL ee kh tp LD ae Mw! dana Nalhasinattonmatint Ma Man ah OR meno eg ak aan : ae eal lng Mm il gin Doses a ate ae eee Wierd SARs Sek Finke Pia i OD dep dipper Aad me hon eS ee eee . OT hae taesh ham cane Diem ily ey Sok =m ¥. WectMondeinyeea% haar) pM adler. Dio cdacedaanaerencaraiedreann iehena om. pecanueeansan Pate ett Seta me of a ee eases epee ed . ‘ : = 2 mn te ~ A eae y i Se: oa , . Cee FR RN Min a alin A feptrete ti ee eee i ie eae inet, ow asm tated RF raga ee nce an a ee nm ee nae real Os Oncaea oR gate at aed Ana me Anh fat aR on pent eae Ne ON a aE earner - a= El A madi ioe ake he et teeta Dec epolie BOE Lb — Me re Robie I, pac peBabend? ot Iprthen SAD ae PA to Bi tO Re DE Mi cy farina biel adhd * eae ee ae at a rare op ron Se ee eee ee ee dee “ma ean 0 > Ae Bate ead I DEO 8 Bete oe | oo > ata eal a rare “i * : = ; s ° : pak Ste ednedidiemes tiated ade DP, est 0h DAGON, Aa Aa eR Re es ake, Leng reat Bhat ede Pree a A ath tae ~ pe ashe Aiton + ore : Sete) NRE edt eam He worn on ePaper aruba viet aims ARM ee OMA GE Ei te BS Gh bi at a PO Bm 8, pate eae ht een! ait e aa te ee hy - , «« 20 Satie rte near ta-ineennlioteintseded mess eres - ae ee ae Van PN tent tn gt ln main DD ts Ree 8 im EM I PP 0 ah tl er eS ere aan oP gi. ter Dpnceaenocan ch i ee am - st GPs te eh tA Grier amen ee EA NOOR eet tei Sana ede py, obtener kpc, Py Mob N. Seen ape r- roi SR eg le AEA eg eet = rah heae. ie ok - + alos Te NAT Hime, tat. Nn Ret. hod ine Ainde the he A Mb hohe nD delet am F Pind. tn Bhtee Pay dy ss ee wee iatig att csdadpeinz® Pande Pam Giiaeae de pears pn nl a - Nn GE -28 0. Hine Cay meas ey OP Ay Manet +t ote ttt entre > + Poe MP pe one. ms ana _ aPeitoyeas ems pate ~ os ee eae dee Sic aie aie ea ae nam Bete hee Sin Mella de on 2e ~ ae - bay oe e — OS ae asiash me i panna neck tegrer poh eer = 7 “tae . ia iol ~ oe et Cr OG Ree mead Be BoM nemo eh Henican st ddl nbd, eth Po Ply linn tat tt oP ntadgl: a Ae Rar Or BF ABD ele 5 ete ee Shee dew ea 0 ae le lan Rais Salis ee elie fe aa” + ethene Fe FAD tnt waren \ oud agnont P 7 hands w : Ries aohoiec ct - - AM ie 10 tel, cede GS wb yeni eta oe Pe OAR pen ste ne twee ae fuse aes te witha Das ich clea beta ere ay igie. Joanie Dubeyiiaunes eeteniecte Fo ae mR nce Nitec Bag ne ARI RNa ig ow oo Neen Regen a etme tialng Re hai, eehaliggeaca ds ne tak vee petatetinepiner Pourty thetrangyameaees heen diinte Note Dam © cena pin Haake “MRt nn tinh. ey ate Bras 1 «ie Mee sefainmisii aed aes A win Se Sal te oth. Nee apn thrall agli ata algres sa Sa Re Reka eine ante nan, « Saeed “ ieee ae hd, Hs a Gs Betonediire a a < Mo he 24 PO ee ee eee ee Sr ee en ae is : i -~- 7 = ath ein pains 4h (= oe eee oN ~ a ee me Mabeone ee a SE Eo bak oR BA aD ta ad Re att hun im Rete IY Me Sen | eit etcetera a ated Pde ty anette Seka. eRe Ree were! « -+ 33 Pee ed he dP Mb Meee eho. A me Fo Meee tebe Mes AS ees o Tae ae Fianna otis Es eR Ieee eehad at ape ee ba be eA ie Reale em el ing ham 5 eae a wr eRe. ens reteret Le Sth ge ee Det i lee adh Ug eat cs pear i ’ ea. qe, 8 en a MB Na nls ore * $ to are as “ a See a Pe ee ete Bas - eet Pra gett Mae, Wiha etle rae ential teteaa el a tee ee : A Nei et mente ee Kale ei Se Min| an mentee rena sarRre Oe Ran 4 Me A taba ‘af ” = - . Pa mt oe a er aM Sek. eee = Ne ee ete wae * ot aor te.” - - m4 Fane a vety ee ee Th ge tite eee nee resin sna ence ; % 7 i - - * P. , é., . 7 id a me ” ‘ eR ae = ite " "1 A 1 eta de Ray He aan ot Seven ey - : soe es ; J " : - ae : : : a ree Bk i ; ee eee eee x me : 2 Fit nha ete 2 é “ 2 =o : . “ - ee ne al) ee ve is oe oH ser mer. ing = oot " : = aout - = are ~~ -- . e E Py : —™ Patt me nw nee atts Cte * “se es te es : “ a : “ mn wr a - - “ r i a a . - - SS — a wv pe . = - _ - - - - oT ~~ ~ @ sa * - 4 - hee Oe 7 Th ¥ - a - - . ” - = -~ - = = = - - ” - * “ u* ~ * — ate ~ fc) _— Ve ~- 7 7 » - = : sal - Fae - ~ ~ - pew tel a 7 i e ~ ra : - >» \ 7 : . 7 : ~* ~ he 1. ene ete & — 7 8 eb 7 © Ea 7 —— ton. f 7 : s » ~ - -' ~ ee eee oe y ae a ~ ~ - ed - ~ 7 ; Sena! “ ome - - a 7 7 epoca is ae _ A =_-ee . ~ * - - . = 7 : x a 7 y - 7% = - ~ ~ - - = a - ~ - a - m~ - = ad - . - - ~_ = - ’ tm , Sr = re a 2 - - . — 7 a — any —— -—- ite et hn ; 7 he ‘~ an a = = ee - om ” ~ a At 4 = eo a aan tae . = ee - - ¥ ? Se iL nm + - 7 . on - - = . e 4 - = ee <7. = = J : : - ar - < - 7 eed - - < n - “ pecs ~~ -- Wa - - . ~- - a - ~ to - - 7 . ‘ : , - . - + - - - - e - pd a - - ~ - ; - ‘ - : . ae ' Z ws ~ = 4 - - ~ =] - - - r - < 7 a as / - —_ : - m. i -_ . - " bs ~ * ry ? - oe i . r ~ - ‘ - - 7” —_ > an of a nga ~ TAY on «OE I = pa ‘Pt, aN , of ol AS Ba . o, St 2 “ 47} aa 52 Sy : SAWS S ip SN ae Was’ S % oO osns a | ull = \RIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILONLILSNI NVINOSHLINS S314WH ) ie ie 2 z i z = -o , Oo - Oo I-~ _ ~ 3 < - - = o = D a oa z # Zz 4 Ee LILSNI NVINOSHLINS S31uyvuaIT LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUT ss = Penn tay ee = < ‘ ; Ae + oye NY SS = Zz Up 5 3 Dif 5 SS F : vr SGyy = No. 8g x ye Se Gye ee = Up = > Me ‘f = . > = ” = Y) 5 = ep) \RIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOLINIJIISNI NYINOSHIWe S3a1yWwHy we ) LILSNI SAIYVYUEIT LIBRARIES RIES SIIIf {} () = SN = je. ae ‘\ G Division of Mollusks SIS @) 4 3 é 3 ~ Z Sectional Library JiSNI_N {Bae by alli y O EY es ES = EF - = : a = ke ” z w Zz wD ee LILSNI NVINOSHLINS S3IYNVWVYSIT LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUT < = Ps wwe = < NS me ar res SOs = Zz oe oF pe A O a = 2 S s 2 = = > = 4 > = Ww) POS v) * TZ wn a SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILALILSNI NVINOSHLINS SaluWuE W =— WY) == yy) ul = Lu Z NS rT feta 4 a ” WN Ss am =F = < s WX < nh 4 fs = WG a NOILE RIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NVINOSHLIWS SMITHSONIAN RIES SMITHSONIAN ALILSNI NVINOSHLIWS SaiYyvVuaITI_LIBRARIES RIES SMITHSONIAN NVINOSHLINS NVINOSHLIWS NOLLNLILSNI INSTITUTION SMITHSONIAN BRARIES INSTITUTION BRARIES RIES SMITHSONIAN sagiuvugin Li ILSNI NVINOSHLINS SAIYVHEI1 LIBRARIES < s) bar 4 = AV, Sa ‘ia = % mo COU SMa oY 7 FXG oe '@) /NOSAY a \\ O ae z aa \ FA INSTITUTION NOILALILSNI NVINOSHLINS S314 a z a z 2 o S ha : 2 = Z E 5 e io i shi he o Ae: n ez SSIYVYEIT LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTI w Zz. ees w” = ‘ = 4 = < \ = z = Zz = DH a oO ree 7, i oY O. 4 a SNe c > = > = Ps 7) ph Vv) a pNOlLNLILSN| NYINOSHLIWS ” NN 4 - 2 OW = (Ey) Cus) e WAR CE = . = i bic oO _ ‘@) j Bie Zz — z Ractieced SS!IYVYGIT LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTI if Zz £ es : 2 : 9) - a) > = %, Aj a cue? 0 | ae ae iis D z o INSTITUTION NOILALILSNI NVINOSHLINS S3Ild & Z < z S = 4b%.= ioe Z 2 2 0 2 3 YG ? EY E 2 = 7 I = eat = > ” +s z= Ww Ps 2 S3IUVUGIT LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN. INSTI = fs ea UY, Z Yim, * oa Di he = = hep, he a, , ORS cx. Oo Oo = za INSTITUTION NOILOLILSNI salu INSTITUTION INSTITUTION SMITHSONIAN NVINOSHLINS S3IYVYUEIT LIBRARIE NVYINOSHLIWS Q X aN SMITHSONIAN SMITHSONIAN * RIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILALILSNI NVINOSHLINS S314 IN LILSNI 3RARIES ANLILSNI SRARIES y ii PROCEEDINGS Division of Molnar: Moston Society of dlatural History. BOLLE QD ND LDLLD OO Oe AU ire 8 a) NG = AAP ALRLSSISAS LISS 1sSGoOo-1S871. BOSTON: PRINTED FOR THE SOCIETY. TRUBNER & CO., 60 PATERNOSTER ROW, LONDON. 1s) Gee Tae A ak ace a ee ee SST Re eee aes ese ee SST a stn, ae a ee ee PUBLISHING COMMITTEE. i Ee Bou vyr: Tuomas M. Brewer. SAMUEL L. ABBOT. A. S. PacKARD, JR. J: (AC Siwiaene PRESS OF A. A. KINGMAN. MUSEUM OF BOSTON SOCIETY OF NATURAL HISTORY, BERKELEY STREET, PROCEEDINGS BOSTON SOCIETY OF NATURAL HISTORY. TAKEN FROM THE SOCIETY’S RECORDS. Annual Meeting, May 5, 1869. Vice President Dr. C. T. Jackson in the chair. Forty-eight members present. _ Mr. 8. H. Scudder presented the following Report.of the Custodian for the past year : — In my last annual report I alluded to a topic which al- though not directly connected with the operations of the Society, seemed to demand its earnest attention. I refer to the refusal of the State Legislature to act upon the petition of the Society’s Council for an extension of the proposed new edition of Dr Gould’s Invertebrates of Massachusetts. Owing to the necessary and most fortunate delay in the pub- lication of this work, an opportunity offered itself for a re- newal of our plea, before a committee and a legislature more open to reasonable suggestions; and to-night I am happy to state that although the cost of the original edition was found to be largely in excess of the estimates, a Resolve was intro- duced into the House of Representatives on the twentieth of April last, both supplying the requisite deficiency, and authorizing an increased edition of eight hundred copies. Four hundred copies were to be given to this Society for distribution “to foreign public institutions of a similar nature, PROCEEDINGS B. S. N. H.—VOL, XUI. 1 AUGUST, 1869. Annual Report. ] 2 [May 6, by direction of its Council and in behalf of the State,” and one hundred copies to the editor, Mr. Binney, “to be -dis- tributed among conchologists in this and foreign countries, in behalf of the State”; this resolve was referred to the Com- mittee of Finance, who have, as yet, taken no formal action upon it; I am assured, however, that there is little doubt of their favorable report and of the final success of the measure. The history of the past twelve months differs little trom that of the preceding year. There have been twenty general meetings of the Society, ten of the Section of En- tomology and six of the Section of Microscopy. At the general meetings the average attendance of members has been thirty-three, at those of the Section of Entomology nearly twelve, and at the Microscopical meetings nearly eight. This does not include ladies who attended nearly one half of the general meetings in response to a recent invitation of the Society. So few, however, availed themselves of the opportunity, that should they be included, the average at- tendance at the general meetings would only be increased to thirty-five. One hundred and five scientific communications have been presented by forty-nine persons, viz., sixty-seven communications by thirty-six persons at the general meet- ings; thirty-three communications by thirteen persons at the meetings of the Entomological Section, and five communica- tions by three persons at those of the Microscopical Section. The following are their titles : — ALLEN, J. A. Notes on Birds observed in Western Jowa, in the months of July, August and September; also on Birds observed in Northern Illinois, in May and June, and at Richmond, Wayne Co., Indiana, between June third and tenth. June 3, 1868. Catalogue of the reptiles and batrachians found in the vicinity of Springfield, Mass., with notices of all the other species known to inhabit the State. December 2, 1868. Appendix to a paper on the reptiles and batrachians of Massa- ~ chusetts. January 20, 1869. 1869. } 3 {Annual Report. Atwoop, Capt. N. E. Observations upon the habits of the sperm whale. June 3, 1868. Description of Carcharias tigris Atw. January 20, 1869. Remarks upon the history of the halibut and other edible fish. April 7, 1869. Bickmore, A. S. Notice of some birds from the Island of Buru. November 18, 1868. Remarks on the animal of Nautilus pompilius. November 18, 1868. On a collection of shells of Nautilus of various ages. December 2, 1868. Remarks on the Babirusa and its distribution. December 2, 1868. BLAKE, W. P. Remarks upon the Ainos. June 17, 1868. Brewer, Dr. T. M. Remarks upon the death of Mr. John Cassin. January 20, 1869. Brieuam, W. T. Notes on Hesperomannia, a new genus of Ha- waiian Composite. (With illustrations.) May 6, 1868. ~ Notice of a new and remarkable eruption of Mauna Loa on the Hawaiian Islands. June 3, 1868. Remarks upon Mr. N.S. Shaler’s Considerations concerning the absence of distinct evidences of glacial action in the valley of the Yukon’River, Alaska. November 4, 1868. Remarks at the announcement of the death of Mr. Horace Mann. November 18, 1868. On the results of Mr. Mann’s study of the Hawaiian Flora. No- vember 18, 1868. The eruption of the Hawaiian Volcanoes, 1868. (With illustra- tions.) December 2, 1868. Volcanic manifestations in New England. April 7, 1869. Brown, Dr. F. H. Some observations on the fauna of Madeira. December 2, 1868. Burcess, HE. On the habits of Anisomorpha buprestoides. Febru- ary 24, 1869. Cotsy, Dr. E. P. Note on the habits of Bryaxis luniger Lec. November 25, 1868. Annual Report.]} 4 (May 5, Corr, E. D. On the Reptilian orders, Pythonomorpha and Strep- tosauria. January 20, 1869. Descriptions of extinct fishes previously unknown. February 3, 1869. Cours, Dr. E. Synopsis of the Birds of 8. Carolina. October 7, 1868. Cresson, E. T. Descriptions of North American Bees, No. I. December 2, 1868. Descriptions of North American Bees, No. HU. January 20, 1869. Notes on Mexican Pompilide, with descriptions of new species, March 24, 1869. Dati, W. H. Remarks upon the Natural History of Alaska. No- vember 4, 1868. Dote, S. B. A synopsis of the Birds hitherto described from the Hawaiian Islands. Jebruary 3, 1869. Frost, Cuarres C. A further enumeration of N. England Fungi. May 20, 1868. GAFFIELD, T. On the accidental presence of water in glass stop- pers. arch 3, 1869. GREENLEAF, R. C. Remarks on the double plate of Aulacodiscus oreganus. JJarch 10, 1869. List of Diatoms from Ashley River, S. Car. March 10, 1869. Hacen, Dr. H. Rectification of a previous paper on Hodotermes japonicus. October 28, 1868. Notice of an imago of Morpho Ilioneus with a caterpillar’s head. November 25, 1868. Upon the manufacture of microscopes. arch 10, 1869. On the diseases of injurious insects. JZarch 24, 1869, On the recent manufacture of cheap objectives for microscopes. April 14, 1869. Hitis, Lurver. Notice of a new locality for minerals, in Auburn, Me. July 1, 1868. 1869.] 5 {Annual Report. Hoy, Dr. G. R. On the nidification of Cooper’s Hawk. April 7, 1869. Notes on the Rough-winged Swallow and the Yellow-bellied Fly- catcher. April 21, 1869. Hyatt, A. Remarks upon Mr. Shaler’s Considerations concerning the absence of distinct evidences of glacial action in the valley of the Yukon River, Alaska. November 4, 1868. On the gradual involution of Cephalopods during life. December 2, 1868. Jackson, Dr. C. T. Analysis of Petrosilex from Melrose. June 8, 1868. Description of the beds of Apatite in North Burgess, Canada West. June 17, 1868. Description of a new locality for tin ore in Winslow, Me. Jan- uary 20, 1869. JerrRries, Dr. B. Joy. Remarks upon the discovery and structure of Euplectella speciosa. ALay 6, 1868. Remarks upon the projection of after-pictures. June 3, 1868. Upon the principle of the Thaumatrope. July 1, 1868. Observations on the vision of Fishes and Amphibians. December 16, 1868. Remarks upon experiments with after-images. February 17, 1869. On the method of accommodation in the eyes of birds. April 21, 1869. McGurser, Henry. On the evidences of the antiquity of man, de- duced from the excavations at High Rock Spring, Saratoga, N. Y. April 21, 1869. Mann, B. P. On the preservation of larve in carbolic acid. No- vember 25, 1868. Mann, Horace. Notes on Alsinidendron, Platydesma and Brig- hamia, new genera of Hawaiian Plants; with an analysis of the Hawaiian Flora. (With illustrations.) December 2, 1868. ‘Marsu, O. C. Observations on the metamorphosis of Siredon into ‘Amblystoma. September 16, 1868. Annual Report.] 6 (May 5, Minot, C. S. Notice of the broods of Chrysophanus americanus. September 23, 1868. Description of the male of Hesperia Metea. February 24, 1869. On the limits of genera. March 24, 1869. Notice of some abnormal cocoons of Bombycide. April 28, 1869. Moore, N. B. Notes upon the habits of the Night Hawk in Lousi- ana. October 7, 1868. Morssz, E. S. On the land-slides in the vicinity of Portland, Maine. (With illustrations.) January 6, 1869. Remarks on the minuter classification of land snails. February 17, 1869. Nites, W. H. Remarks on the occurrence of recent shells at a great depth below Fort Warren, Boston Harbor. January 6, 1869, March 17, 1869. Ancient operations in the Petroleum Region of Pennsylvania. March 17, 1869. PApPENDIEK, E. Notice of the occurrence of Silpha atrata in Milton, Mass. March 24, 1869. Perry, Rev. J. B. Sketch of the life of the late Dr. E. Emmons. December 2, 1868. Observations on some Indian Relics in Swanton, Vt. December 2, 1868. PourtaLses, L. F. pe. On some deep sea dredging between Cuba and the Florida Keys. October 7, 1868. Putnam, F. W. On some ancient utensils from Nicaragua. De- cember 2, 1868. Sanporn, F. G. Description and history of a new species of Eri- rhinus, E. juniperinus. May 27, 1868. Description of the larva and pupa case of Microdon globosus Fabr. (With illustrations.) June 24, 1868. On the habits of Heterocerus fatuus Kiesenw. June 24, 1868. Remarks on a number of interesting insects. September 22, 1868. Intelligence in the larva of Elaphidion villosum. January 27, 1869. © Recent discovery of Boreus brumalis, in Mass. April 28, 1869. 1809.) 7 {Annual Report. ScHLAGINTWEIT R. von. Remarks upon Nephrite from Turkistan. October 21, 1868. Scupper, 8. H. Brief account of the migratory grasshoppers of the United States. June 17, 1868. Experiments upon the reproduction of lost limbs in the Walking Stick, Diapheromera femorata. September 23, 1868. Notice of a Chalciditan, parasitic in the eggs of Gidipoda carolina. September 23, 1868. | A century of Orthoptera: Decade I, Gryllides. October.28, 1868. Remarks upon Mr. Shaler’s Considerations concerning the absence of distinct evidences of glacial action in the valley of the Yukon River, Alaska. November 4, 1868. Remarks upon the arrangement of the families of Orthoptera. December 23, 1868. Notes on Orthoptera collected by Prof. James Orton on either side of the Andes of equatorial South America. February 24, 1869. A study of the gigantic lobe-crested Grasshoppers of Central and South America. February 24, 1869. Report upon a collection of duwaal Lepidoptera, made in “Alasles by the scientific corps of the Russo-American telegraph expedi- tion, under the direction of Lieut. W. H. Dall. April 28, 1869. Notice of a new cave insect from N. Zealand. April 28, 1869. SHAuLerR, N. S. On the nature of the movements involved in the changes of level of shore lines. (With illustrations.) October 7, 1868. On the disappearance of the cane from the central part of the Ohio valley. October 7, 1868. Considerations concerning the absence of distinct evidences of glacial action in the valley of the Yukon River, Alaska. No- vember 4, 1868. Notes on the concentric structure of granitic rocks. February 3, 1869. SmituH, G. D. List of Coleoptera collected by Prof. James Orton in Ecuador and Brazil. Tebruary 24, 1869. Smitu, S. I. Notes on new or little known species of American cancroid Crustacea. February 3, 1869. Annual Report.] 8. [May 6, StoppER, C. Remarks upon Dr. Woodward’s photographs of No- bert’s test plate. November 11, 1868. Sumicurast, F. The geographical distribution of the native birds of the department of Vera Cruz, with a list of the migratory species, translated by Dr. T. M. Brewer. December 16, 1868. TRovuvELoT, L. Upon the comparative study of juvenile larve. June 24, 1868. On an interesting habit of the larva of Papilio Turnus. June 24, 1868. Notice of some points of analogy between Limacodes and some Hymenoptera. June 24, 1868. Unter, P. R. Notices of the Hemiptera obtained by the expedi- tion of Prof. James Orton in Ecuador and Brazil. February 24, 1869. Verritt, A. E. On new and imperfectly known Echinoderms and Corals. April 7, 1869. Watney, C. P. Description of a new species of Thecla. Novem- ber 25, 1868. WuittLEsry, Cot. C. The physical geology of Eastern Ohio. (With illustrations.) February 3, 1869. Wrman, Dr. J. Ona thread worm (Filaria anhinge) infesting the brain of the snake bird (Photus anhinga). (With illustrations.) October 7, 1868. On the mode of formation of the Dighton Rock inscriptions. De- cember 2, 1868. Five corresponding and twenty-nine resident members have been elected during the year. Of the resident members six have not complied with the requirements of the Constitution, and their names are not placed on our rolls; two others who have paid the entrance fee have not yet signed the Consti- tution. The Lectures given under the auspices of the Society are coming into more general notice, and are therefore better 1869.] 9 {Annual Report. attended. Three courses have been delivered during the winter and spring. The first course consisted of four lec- tures upon Optical Phenomena, by Dr. B. Joy Jeftries; the second of twelve lectures upon the Geological History of North America, by Mr. W. H. Niles, and the third of twelve lectures, several of which are yet to be given, upon Plant Life, by Mr. W. T. Brigham. The first course was but little advertised, and being also upon a limited subject, attracted but a slender audience; the second course was attended by an average of sixty-six persons; and the third, delivered in the evening, by an audience averaging thus far ninety-nine persons. Perhaps the large amount of the Society’s publications has been the most noticeable feature in the history of the past year. We have issued no less than the equivalent of one thousand two hundred and twenty-nine octavo pages, a num- ber at least double that of any previous year of our history. It was announced in the last report that our publications, and especially the Proceedings, would appear with greater prompt- ness than before; and we can say with just pride that no Society in this country can at all compete with us in this respect; during the greater part of the year,—and had it not been for one unforeseen and unavoidable strain upon our print- ing office, we should have said during the whole year,—we have placed upon the table at each meeting of the Society, a part, at least, of the printed Proceedings of the previous meet- ing; this has been scarcely more difficult, no more expensive, and to our subscribers and contributors in every way more satisfactory than the former deliberate method of issuing our publications. We are now placing a press in our printing office, so that, with the exception of stereotyping, all our future work will be done within our own walls, and with still greater promptness. The twelfth volume of our Proceedings, begun a year ago, Annual Report.] 10 [May 5, has reached the four hundredth page, and includes the records of the last regular meeting, held a fortnight ago to-day. Early in the year we published the Annual Report and our first Annual, of one hundred and twenty-eight pages, with which you are all familiar; in the winter an outline Physical map of North Amezvica, to be used in indicating the boundaries of the geographical distribution of animals and plants; a large edition was printed, and copies are sold at cost to induce stu- dents to engage in a study which promises the best results. Recently we have issued two important works, the fourth and concluding part of the first volume of our Memoirs, and the first volume of our Occasional Papers; the former included papers by Col. Whittlesey, upon the weapons. and military character of the ancient mound builders of the West, and upon the physical geology of Eastern Ohio; by Mr. Vose on the distortion of pebbles in conglomerates, mainly drawn from his studies near Rangeley Lake in Maine; by Mr. Allen upon the birds which he observed in Iowa, Illinois and Indiana; by Mr. Brigham upon Hesperomannia, and upon the recent eruption of the Hawaiian volcanoes; by the late Mr. Mann upon new genera of: Hawaiian plants, with an analysis of the Hawaiian flora; and by Prof. Sumichrast upon the geograph- ical distribution of the birds of Vera Cruz, in Mexico. ‘Our new octavo series, called “Occasional Papers,” is intro- duced by a volume of the Entomological Correspondence of the late Dr. T. W. Harris, edited by the Secretary; the body of the work is made up of both sides of the correspondence between Dr. Harris and Prof. Hentz, Drs. Melsheimer, Le- Conte, Zimmermann and LeBaron, Miss Morris, and Messrs. Doubleday, Herrick, Say, Darling and Higginson. Numerous notes, principally upon the earlier stages of Insects, are added _ from Dr. Harris’s uss., and some articles which originally ap- peared in obscure and now inaccessible Journals, are repub- lished. An interesting Memoir of the author is given by Col. Higginson, and a steel portrait from a photograph furnished ~ 1869.] 11 [Annual Report. by the family is prefixed. The work is also embellished by steel plates and woodcuts. We must again express our great indebtedness to the Smithsonian Institution for the liberality with which they transmit our publications from Washington to foreign coun- tries, and receive returns for us through their European agents, free of charge. This system of interchange, initiated many years ago by the Smithsonian Institution, has proved of immense advantage to American Societies, not only in a monetary point of view, but in the simplicity of the method and the certainty of its results. It is, however, much to be desired that the transmission from this country could be made with greater frequency, not so much for our own sake as for that of our foreign correspondents; while parcels are for- warded to us at an average interval of three or four weeks, we do not send our own publications more than once a year; in- deed many of our transactions do not reach our foreign friends until a year after their publication. This year our transmis- sions have been twice as large as usual, that for 1868 having been forwarded immediately after the Annual Meeting, and that for 1869 afew weeks ago. We have sent away 737 parts of our Memoirs, 312 parts of the old Journal, 254 com- plete volumes of the Proceedings, unbound sheets of the same equivalent to 367 volumes, 303 copies of the Harris Correspondence, 340 copies of the first Annual, and 597 copies of the Annual Reports, equal in all to three quarters of a million of octavo pages. In response to our special requests, we have been favored by the following Societies, with many early volumes of their Publications : — Naturhistorischer Verein des Preussischen Rheinlandes Bonn. Société Linnéenne . 5 i - Bordeaux. Schlesische Gesellschaft fiir vaterlandische Cultur - Breslau. Ee Physiosraphiske Forening 290.2... .«. Christiania. oyal Physical Society. -. . «.. « .. .« Edinburgh. Anaual Report.] 12 [May 5, Naturforschende Gesellschaft ope) 0h) yay, tm, SS Te a Ue . e . e 2 . Gorl itz. Naturhistorische < - : 5 Z . Hannover. Finska Vetenskaps-Societeten 5 Helsingfors. * Provinciaal Genootschap van Kunsten en 1 Weteriselaeepen Hertogenbosch. Geological and Polytechnic Society of the West Riding of Yorkshire 2 - 3 . Leeds. * Zeitschrift fiir ireconacharthelte Zoolorte eae . Leipzig. = Academia Lugduno-Batava . : . . Leyden. * Société Impériale des Sciences, de P Accietitnts et des Arts . : : : : ° » Latle. Royal Geoerdnnien Soon = ° Big Os - London. * The Zoologist . ¢ 5 5 : ‘ - . K6onigliche Realschule . - : . ° - « Meseritz. * Société Impériale d’ Agriculture . = . : - Moscou. se “des Naturalistes = Die Pollichia: naturwissenschaftlicher Vien ee: Rhein- ialZzwhen ince Seite 2 bee: hy ane . Neustadt. *® Ministére de la Newine ‘ A “ “ . : -, Paris, * Muséum d’ Histoire Naturelle : é ° * . e Société des Antiquaires de France “ Géologique de France é ai! be a RS * “ Impériale et Centrale duAericaieuie’ . 5 * Universidad de Chile . : : A . Santiago. K. K. Zoologisch-botanische Gassicenee P 7 - Wien. Of these we must particularly express our thanks to the Imperial Society of Antiquaries, the Minister of the Marine, the Imperial Society of Agriculture, the Geological Society and the Museum of Natural History,—all of Paris, the Uni- versity of Chili, the Leyden Academy, the new Magazine of Natural History at Christiania, the Provincial Society of Sa- ence and Arts in North Brabant, and the Imperial Society of Science, etc. of Lille; they have favored us with extensive series of great importance. The following institutions, in addition to those prefixed by an asterisk in the list above, have been added to our circle of correspondents. State Agricultural Society ey tates =) ot.) Adbamiye Ministére de l’Intérieur du Royaume des PayelBee . Amsterdam. Natural History and Philosophical Society . - Belfast. Cambridge Philosophical Society . : Bit: he . Cambridge, Eng. Naturwissenschaftliche Gesellschaft : : - « Chemnitz. 1869.] 1133 [Annual Report. Oekonomische Gesellschaft im Konigreich Sachsen - Dresden. Botanical Society . : . : 5 - ° . Edinburgh. Societa Entomologica Italiana . : é aa timenzes Deutsche Malakozoologische Geselischinhy’ : - . Frankfurt a. M. Universitat 2 a : - - . 5 - Kiel. Historic Society of Lancashire Hard Cheshire . - . Liverpool. Geological Magazine 4 : : : - London. Journal of Travel and Natural Tistory : : - - ss Scientific Opinion . ; : : 5 ; - > ee Scientific Students’ Association - - 7 2 - Manchester. Naturhistorischer Verein von Wisconsin : ° . Milwaukee. Reale Istituto d’Incoraggiamento alle Scienze Naturali . Napoli. American Agriculturist . ; 4 : ; : . New York. Revue et Magazin de Zoologie : - : - ernie arise Société des Antiquaires . . : : - : ig Lotos: Zeitschrift fiir area senschatien : : Jie Le Naturaliste Canadien . : : : : . - Quebec. American Entomologist . 5 : “ - St. Louis. Allgemeine Schweizerische Gesellschaft fiir die gesamm- ten Naturwissenschaften - . : - Switzerland. Canadian Entomologist . , ; - : : - Toronto. The accompanying table gives a summary of the additions to the Library by volumes, parts of volumes, pamphlets and maps or charts. Octavo: || Quarto. || Folio. ey a vls|pts|ph | 'vls|pts|ph |/vls |pts| ph\|Ch’ts |/To’1 Books presented by individuals. . |l10i| eajisel| 22, | 3) 4/ 3| || — 58|| 410 ie A “ Publishing Com. 1) 35} 10 1 : 1} 54 «* purchased (Wolcott Fund) . 18} 1 3} 3} 2 5 82 ** deposited in Binney library . 2| 2 4 «¢ «« by the Republican In- SELMMOM Sse PTL ae HL 6 6 “* received in exchange . . . {/800)551)103)| 85/189) 41/) 10) 42) 1 2|/13825 Total . ||426\850/269|,113|1951 52|| 14l 50! 1) 61/1831 The arrangement of the books in the back library, not completed at the time of the last report, was finished shortly after ; since then the alcove catalogue of the whole liorary has been completed, while the correction of the card catalogue, Annual Report.] 14 [May 5, necessitated by the almost entire rearrangement or the books on furnishing the new library, is advancing as rapidly as pos- sible. ‘The constant employment of a binder in the building has wrought a most agreeable change in the appearance of our shelves. Six hundred and seventy-seven books have been bound, and more than five hundred volumes are at this time in various stages of completion. But the work of the binder has not been limited to the library, for besides the folding of the signatures of our Proceedings and of extras issued to au- thors, six hundred copies of the Harris Correspondence, and over four hundred volumes of the Proceedings have been bound in cloth, and more than four hundred numbers of the Journal stitched. The binder has also been employed in some outside work, for which the Society charges but a slight ad- vance upon the cost, and which is permitted by the Council in order to lessen the immediate expense incurred. The work of the library assistants has been greatly increased, by the necessary preparation of so many books for the binder, and as their time has also been partly occupied by the Curators, much work still remains unfinished ; notwithstanding the con- tinual employment of a second assistant, the mass of pam- phlets still remains inaccessible; all new pamphlets, however, have been catalogued as soon as received, and perhaps one tenth of the old ones are now upon the shelves. 636 books have been borrowed from the library by 82 per- SONS. In connection with the Smithsonian Institution, the Society has continued to carry on explorations in Central America, Since Col. Grayson’s return from the island of Socorro, he has been investigating the natural history of the Sierra Madre, but no returns are expected for several months to come. Col. Grayson’s account of his expedition to Socorro and the Tres Marias, sent to us for publication, has been re- vised and partly annotated by Prof. Baird, but still remains in - his hands, awaiting the result of additional excursions on the 1869.} 15 [Annual Report. main land, that the peculiar fauna of that region may be more fairly represented. In consequence, none of the birds obtained by Col. Grayson have yet been distributed, but a fine collection from Costa Rica, identified by Mr. Lawrence, and kindly presented to us by Professor Henry, is an earnest of what we may expect from time to time; indeed, our col- lection of birds bids fair to exhibit in the course of a few years a more complete representation of the fauna of North- west Mexico and the adjacent islands, than can be found outside of the Museum of the Smithsonian Institution. We have also contributed toward an exploration of the isthmus of Tehuantepec from ocean to ocean, carried on through the patronage of the Smithsonian Institution by Prof. Sumichrast, a most assiduous and scientific collector. It will probably continue for one or two years, and a few re- turns have already been received and distributed to various parties for identification. The expedition promises to be. very successful. For several months we have been employing one of our members, Mr. W. H. Dall, to select specimens from the Smithsonian duplicates, partly in return for the contribution we made toward their Explorations, partly as a direct gift from the Institution. We have already received many fossils and mollusks, and are daily expecting a large collection of the nests and eggs of birds. By the favor of the Mayor and Chief of Police, two offi- cers are detailed on museum days to protect our collections and preserve order; they render most efficient aid, without which we think it would be impossible to maintain our prac- tice of opening the museum twice a week. There have been more than 36,000 visitors to the Museum during the year, but it has been impossible to keep an accu- rate record; the enumeration has often been a partial one and at times estimates had to take the place of more careful counting. The Museum has been open to the public 104 Annual Report.) 16 {May 5. days; on Thursdays, by ticket, 52 days; the average attend- — ance on public days has been at least 336. In the department of Mammals and Comparative Anatomy a very desirable step has been taken, authorizing the Cura- tor to obtain mounted specimens of all our New England mammals; to make room for them the Ethnological collec- tions will be removed. For several months the department was left without a curator, but lately the objects have been placed in better order, and recently acquired specimens put on exhibition. The principal additions have been a black bear and an antelope, both in a fresh condition, one received from Mr. W. T. Adams, and the other from the City, through Mr. J. Galvin. The collection of mounted birds has been rearranged so as to bring it into more convenient view, and a case for skins completed, which will enable the Curator to arrange the unmounted birds more safely than has heretofore been possi- ble. In accordance with the request made in last year’s report, the collection of land birds of Massachusetts has been enriched by a number of specimens, and especially by a donation of twenty-five birds from Mr. L. L. Thaxter of Newton. Mrs. Bryant has again laid the department under obligation for a valuable and extensive collection of un- mounted birds from the West Indies and Central and South America, and Prof. Henry of the Smithsonian Institution has presented eighty specimens of Costa Rican birds, all of which have been labelled by Mr. Lawrence. The department of the nests and eggs of birds has been entirely rearranged and newly labelled, and is now in a very satisfactory condition. In round numbers the collection consists of the eggs of seven hundred birds, viz:—four hundred Ameri- can, two hundred European, and one hundred from various parts of the world; about one hundred and fifty of the whole — number are accompanied by nests; this estimate includes a 1869.] 17 [Annual Report. collection of European eggs which the Curator purposes to present as soon as he can select them. Other important ac- cessions have been received. Over fifteen hundred duplicates of eggs of about fifty species, most valuable for exchange, were given by Mrs. Bryant, and about two hundred and fitty nests and eggs selected by the Curator, were presented by the Smithsonian Institution. About thirty specimens from Kurope have been received in exchange, and a small number of nests and eggs purchased. The following list of the nests and eggs of birds in our collection has been prepared by the Curator, with the assist- ance of Mr. Sanborn; any not specified would be acceptable additions to this A iacunente ; they are all the gift of the late Dr. Henry Bryant, excepting those prefixed by an asterisk; Nn. following the name of the bird signifies that the nest alone is in the collection; x. é. signifies nest and eggs; in all other cases the eggs ail are meant. BIRDS OF NORTH AMERICA NORTH OF MEXICO. Cathartes aura Illig. Pandion carolinensis Bon. Cathartes atratus Lesson. Polyborus tharus Cassin. Falco anatum Bonaparte. Craxirex unicinctus Cassin. Hypotriorchis columbarius Gr. Bubo virginianus Bonap. Falco candicans Gmelin. _ Scops asio Bonap. Falco islandicus Sabine. Otus Wilsonianus Lesson. Tinnunculus sparverius Vieill. Brachyotus Cassinii Brewer. Astur atricapillus Bonap. *® Syrnium nebulosum Gray. Accipiter Cooperii Bonap. Crotophaga ani Linn. Accipiter fuscus Bonap. Geococcyx californianus Baird. * Buteo calurus Cassin. Coccygus americanus Bonap. n. e. Buteo borealis Vieill. Coceygus erythrophthalmus Bonap. Buteo montanus Nuttall. Picus villosus Linn. Buteo lineatus Jardine. Picus pubescens Linn. Archibuteo lagopus Gray. Picoides arcticus Gray. Archibuteo ferrugineus Gray. Sphyropicus varius Baird. Elanus leucurus Bonap. Centurus carolinus Bonap. Ictinia mississippiensis Gray. Centurus flaviventris Sw. Circus hudsonius Vieillot. Melanerpes erythrocephalus Sw. * Aquila canadensis Cassin. * Melanerpes formicivorus Bonap. Haliaetus leucocephalus Savigny. Melanerpes torquatus Bonap. PROCEEDINGS B. &. N. H.—VOL. XIIi. 2 AuGust, 1869. Annual Report.] Colaptes auratus Swainson. Colaptes mexicanus Swains. * Lampornis mango Swains. n. Trochilus colubris Linn. n. e. Atthis Auna Reichenb. n.e. Cheetura pelasgia Steph. n. e. Antrostomus carolinensis Gould. Antrostomus vociferus Bonap. Antrostomus Nuttalli Cassin. Chordeiles popetue Baird. Chordeiles Henryi Cassin. Chordeiles texensis Lawrence. Ceryle alcyon Boie. Milvulus forficatus Sw. n. e. Tyrannus carolinensis Baird. Tyrannus dominicensis Rich. Tyrannus verticalis Say. n.e. Tyrannus vociferans Sw. n. e. Myiarchus crinitus Cab. Myiarchus mexicanus Baird. n. e. Sayornis nigricans Bonap. n. e Sayornis fuscus Baird. n. e. Sayornis Sayus Baird. n. Contopus Richardsonii Baird. n. Contopus virens Cab. n. e. Empidonax Traillii Baird. n. e. Empidonax pusillus Cab. n. e. Empidonax minimus Baird. n. e. Empidonax acadicus Baird. n.e. Empidonax flaviventris Baird. Empidonax difficilis Baird. n. e. Pyrocephalus mexicanus Sclat. Turdus mustelinus Gm. n. e. Turdus PaHasi Cab. Turdus fuscescens Stephens. n. e. Turdus ustulatus Nuttall. n. e. Turdus Swainsonii Cab. n. e. Turdus Aliciae Baird. n. e. Turdus migratorius Linn. n.e. Saxicola cenanthe Bechst. Sialia sialis Baird. n. e. Sialia mexicana Swains. n. e. Anthus ludovicianus Licht. Mniotilta varia Vieill. n. Parula americana Bonap. Geothlypis trichas Cab. n. e. © Geothlypis Macgillivrayi Baird. n. nN. ée. 18 * * [May 5, Icteria viridis Bonap. n. e. Icteria longicauda Lawr. on. e. Helminthophaga chrysoptera B. n. e. Helminthophaga ruficapilla Bd. n.e. Helminthophaga celata Baird. n. e. Helminthophaga peregrina Cab. Seiurus aurocapillus Sw. n. e. Seiurus noveboracensis Nutt. n. e. Seiurus ludovicianus Bonap. n. e. Dendroica virens Baird. n. e. Dendroica coronata Gray. n. e. Dendroica Blackburnie Baird. Dendroica castanea Baird. Dendroica pinus Baird. n. e. Dendroica pennsylvanica Baird. n. e. Dendroica striata Baird. n. e. Dendroica estiva Baird. n. e. Dendroica maculosa Baird. n. e. Dendroica discolor Baird. n. e. Myiodioctes mitratus Aud. Setophaga ruticilla Sw. n.e. Pyranga rubra Vieill. Pyranga estiva Vieill. Hirundo horreorum Barton. Hirundo lunifrons Say. Hirundo bicolor Vieill. Cotyle riparia Boie. n. e. Cotyle serripennis Bonap. Progne purpurea Boie. Ampelis garrulus Binn. Ampelis cedrorum Baird. n. e. Collyrio ludovicianus Baird. Collyrio excubitoroides Baird. n. e. Vireo olivaceus Vieill. Vireo altiloquus Gray. n.e. Vireo gilvus Bonap. Vireo Belli Aud. n.e. Vireo noveboracensis Bonap. n. e. Nn. &. _Vireo solitarius Vieill. Vireo flavifrons Vieill. n.e. Mimus polyglottus Boie. Mimus carolinensis Gray. n. e. Oreoscoptes montanus Baird. Harporhynchus redivivus Cab. n. e. Harporhynchus cinereus Xantus. Harporhynchus curvirostris Cab. Harporhynchus longirostris Cab. 1869.] 19 [Annual Report. Harporhynchus rufus Cab. Spizella pallida Bonap. n. e. Campylorhynchus brunneicapillus * Spizella Breweri Cass. n. e. Gray. n.e. Melospiza melodia Baird. n. e. * Campylorhynchus affinis Xantus. n.e. Melospiza Lincolnii Baird. Thryothorus ludovicianus Bonap. n.e. Melospiza palustris Baird. Cistothorus palustris Cab. Peucza estivalis Cab. Cistothorus stellaris Cab. n.e. Peuczea Cassinii Baird. Troglodytes zedon Vieill. n.e. Passerella iliaca Sw. Troglodytes Parkmanni Aud. Calamospiza bicolor Bonap. Sitta carolinensis Gmelin. Euspiza americana Bonap. n. e. * Sitta pygmea Vigors. n. Guiraca ludoviciana Sw. n. e. Polioptila czerulea Sclat. n. e. Guiraca melanocephala Sw. n. e. Parus atricapillus Linn. * Guiraca cerulea Sw. n.e. Parus carolinensis Aud. Cyanospiza ciris Baird. n.e. Psaltriparus minimus Bonap. n.e. Cyanospiza amcena Baird. n.e Paroides flaviceps Baird. n.e. Cyanospiza cyanea Baird. Certhiola flaveola Sund. n. e. Pyrrhuloxia sinuata Bonap. Eremophila cornuta Boie. Cardinalis virginianus Benap. n. e. Carpodacus purpureus Gray. n.e. Cardinalis igneus Baird. Carpodacus frontalis Gray. n. e. Pipilo erythrophthalmus Vieill. n.e. Chrysomitris tristis Bonap. n. e. Pipilo fuscus Sw. n.e. Chrysomitris psaltria Bonap. n.e. * Pipilo chlorura Baird. on. e. Chrysomitris Lawrencii Bonap. n. e. * Pipilo albigula Baird. n. e. Zigiothus linaria Cab. Dolichonyx oryzivorus Sw. n.e. Zigiothus fuscescens Coues. n. e. Molothrus pecoris Sw. | Plectrophanes lapponicus Selby. n. é€. Agelaius phceniceus Vicill. n.e. Plectrophanes pictus Sw. n.e. Agelaius gubernator Bonap. * Plectrophanes ornatus Towns. n.es Xanthocephaius icterocephalus Bd. Plectrophanes Maccownii Lawr. n. @. Passerculus savanna Bonap. n.e. Trupialis militaris Bonap. Passerculus anthinus Bonap. Sturnella magna Sw. Passerculus alaudinus Bonap. n.e. Sturnella neglecta Aud. Pooecetes gramineus Baird. n. Icterus Audubonii Giraud. * Coturniculus passerinus Bonap. n.e. Icterus parisorum Bonap. Coturniculus Henslowi Bonap. Icterus cucullatus Swains. Ammodromus caudacutus Sw. Icterus spurius Bonap. n. e. Ammodromus maritimus Sw. Icterus baltimore Daudin. n.e. Chondestes grammaca Bonap. n.e. Icterus Bullockii Bonap. n.e. Zonotrichia leacophrys Sw. Scolecophagus ferrugineus Sw. n. e Zonotrichia Gambelii Nutt. n. e. Scolecophagus cyanocephalus Cab. Zonotrichia albicollis Bonap. n. ¢. eee * Junco oregonus Sclat. n.e. Quiscalus macroura Sw. Junco hyemalis Sclat. n.e. Quiscalus major Vieill. -® Poospiza bilineata Sclat. n.e. Quiscalus versicolor Vieill. n.e. Spizella monticola Baird. n.e. Corvus carnivorus Bartram. Spizella pusilla Bonap. na. e. Corvus cryptoleucus Couch. Spizella socialis Bonap. n. e. Corvus americanus And. Annual Report.] Corvus ossifragus Wilson. Pica hudsonica Bonap. Cyanura cristata Sw. n.e. Cyanocitta californica Strick. Cyanocitta floridana Bonap. Columba leucocephaia Linn. Ectopistes migratoria Sw. Zenaida amabilis Bonap. Melopelia leucoptera Bonap. Zenaidura carolinensis Bonap. Scardafella squamosa Bonap. n. @. Chameepelia passerina Sw. Oreopeleia martinica Reich. Ortalida M’c Calli Baird. Meleagris gallopavo Linn. Meleagris mexicana Gould. Tetrao obscurus Say. Tetrao canadensis Linn. Centrocercus urophasianus Sw. Pedicecetes phasianellus Baird. Cupidonia cupido Baird. Bonasa umbellus Steph. Lagopus albus Aud. Lagopus Reinhardtii. Ortyx virginianus Bonap. Ortyx texanus Lawr. Oreortyx pictus Baird. Lophortyx californicus Bonap. Cyrtonyx massena Gould. Grus canadensis Temm. Demiegretta Pealii Baird. Demiegretta rufa Baird. Demiegretta ludoviciana Baird. Garzetta candidissima Bonap. Herodias egretta Gray. Herodias californica Baird. Ardea herodias Linn. Audubonia occidentalis Bonap. Florida czrulea Baird. Ardetta exilis Gray. Botaurus lentiginosus Steph. Butorides virescens Bonap. Nyctiardea gardeni Baird. Nyctherodius violaceus Reich. Tantalus loculator Linn. Ibis alba VieillJot. Ibis Ordii Bonaparte. 20 (May 6, Platalea ajaja Linn. Pheenicopterus ruber Linn. Charadrius virginicus Borck. fEgialitis vociferus Cassin. Zgialitis Wilsonius Cassin. gialitis semipalmatus Cab. Zigialitis melodus Cab. * Squatarola helvetica Cuv. Haematopus palliatus Temm. * Strepsilas melanocephala Vig. Recurvirostra americana Gm. Himantopus nigricollis Vieillot. Phalaropus Wilsonii Sab. Phalaropus hyperboreus Temm. * Phalaropus fulicarius Bonap. Philohela minor Gray. Gallinago Wilsonii Bonap. * Macrorhamphus griseus Leach. Tringa maritima Brinnich. * Tringa Wilsonii Nuttall. Ereunetes petrificatus Ill. Symphemia semipalmata Hartl. Gambetta flavipes Bonap. * Rhyacophilus solitarius Bonap. Tringoides macularius Gray. * Philomachus pugnax Gray. Actiturus bartramius Bonap. * Tryngites rufescens Cab. Limosa hudsonica Sw. Numenius longirostris Wils. * Numenius hudsonicus Latham. * Numenius borealis Latham. Rallus elegans Aud. Rallus crepitans Gm. Rallus virginianus Linn. n. e. Porzana carolina Vieill. Crex pratensis Bechst. Fulica americana Gmelin. Gallinula galeata Bonap. Gallinula martinica Lath. Cygnus americanus Sharpless. * Cygnus buccinator Rich. * Anser hyperboreus Pallas. Anser Gambelii Hartlaub.° Bernicla canadensis Boie. * Bernicla Hutchinsii Bonap. * Bernicla nigricans Cassin. 1869.] ® Chloephaga canagica Bonap. Dendrocygna autumnalis Eyton. Anas boschas Linn. Anas obscura Gm. Dafila acuta Jenyns. Nettion carolinensis Baird. Nettion crecca Kaup. Querquedula discors Steph. Querquedula cyanopterus Cassin. Spatula clypeata Boie. Chaulelasmus streperus Gray. Mareca americana Stephens. Mareca Penelope Bonap. Aix sponsa Boie. Fulix marila Baird. Fulix affinis Baird. * Fulix collaris Baird. Aythya americana Bonap. Aythya vallisneria Bonap. Bucephala americana Baird. € Bucephala albeola Baird. Harelda glacialis Leach. ® Lampronetta Fischeri Brandt. Melanetta velvetina Baird. Pelionetta perspicillata Kaup. Somateria mollissima Leach. n. e. *® Somateria v-nigra Gray. * Somateria spectabilis Leach. Erismatura rubida Bonap. Mergus americanus Cass. Mergus serrator Linn. Lophodytes cucullatus Reich. ® Pelecanus erythrorhynchus Gm. Pelecanus fuscus Linn. Sula bassana Briss. Sula fiber Linn. Tachypetes aquila Vieillot. Graculus carbo Gray. Graculus dilophus Gray. Graculus floridanus Bonap. Graculus penicillatus Bonap. Graculus violaceus Gray. Plotus anhinga Linn. Phaeton flavirostris Brandt. * Procellaria glacialis Linn. * Thalassidroma furcata Gould. Thalassidroma Leachii Temm. [Annual Report. # Thalassidroma pelagica Bonap. * Pufiinus anglorum Temm. Puffinus obscurus Lath. Stercorarius parasiticus Temm. Stercorarius cepphus Ross. Larus glaucus Briinn. Larus glaucescens Licht. Larus leucopterus Faber. Larus marinus Linn. Larus argentatus Brinn. .Larus occidentalis Aud. Larus californicus Lawr. Larus delawarensis Ord. Larus brachyrhynchus Rich. Chroicocephalus atricilla Linn. Chroicocephalus Franklinii Br. Chroicocephalus philadelphia Lawr. Rissa tridactyla Bonap. Xema Sabinii Bonap. Sterna aranea Wils. Sterna regia Gambel. Sterna acuflavida Cabot. Sterna fuliginosa Gm. Sterna Wilsoni Bonap. Sterna macroura Naum. Sterna Forsteri Nutt. Sterna paradisea Briinn. Sterna frenata Gambel. Hydrochelidon plumbea Wils. Anous stolidus Leach. Rhynchops nigra Linn. Colymbus torquatus Briinn. Colymbus arcticus Linn. Colymbus pacificus Lawr. Colymbus septentrionalis Linn. Podiceps griseigena Gray. Podiceps occidentalis Lawr. Podiceps cornutus Latham. Podiceps californicus Heermann. Podilymbus podiceps Lawr. Alcea torda Linn. Mormon cirrhata Bonap. Mormon arctica Illiger. Cerorhina monocerata Cassin. Uria grylle Latham. Uria columba Cassin. Uria carbo Brandt. Annual Report. | Uria lomvia Briinnich. Uria ringvia Briimnich. 22 Uria arra Pallas. BIRDS OF EUROPE. * Halietus albicilla Leach. * Buteo vulgaris Bechst. * Archibuteo lagopus Brehm. * Pernis apivorus Bonap. * Milvus regalis Briss. * Milvus niger Briss. * Falco lithofalco Gmel. * Falco tinnunculus Linn. * Falco cenchris Naum. * Astur palumbarius Bechst. * Accipiter nisus Pall. * Circus zruginosus Savigr. * Circus cyaneus Boie. * Circus cineraceus Naum. * Syrnium aluco Brehm. * Strix flammea Linn. * Otus vulgaris Flemm. * Scops Aldrovandi Willughb. * Picus major Linn. * Picus medius Linn. * Gecinus viridis Boie. * Gecinus canus Boie. * Yunx torquilla Linn. * Cuculus canorus Linn. Coracias garrula Linn. * Merops apiaster Linn. * Alcedo ispida Linn. * Sitta europzea Linn. * Certhia familiaris Linn. * Upupa epops Linn. * Corvus corax Linn. * Corvus corone Linn. * Corvus cornix Linn. * Corvus frugilegus Linn. * Corvus monedula Linn. * Pyrrhocorax alpinus VieilL * Pica caudata Linn. * Pica cyanea Wagl. * Garrulus glandarius Vieill * Lanius minor Gmel. * Lanius rufus Briss. * Lanius collurio Linn. * Sturnus vulgaris Linn. * Passer domesticus Briss. * Passer hispaniolensis Degl. * Passer montanus Briss. * Pyrrhula vulgaris Temm. * Coccothraustes vulgaris Vieill. * Ligurinus chloris Koch. * Fringilla celebs Linn. * Montifringilla nivalis Brehm. * Carduelis elegans Steph. * Chrysomitris spinus Boie. * Serinus meridionalis Bonap. * Cannabina linota G. R. Gray. * Cannabina flavirostris Brehm. * Linaria borealis Vieill. * Linaria rufescens Vieill. * Miliaria europza Swains. * Emberiza citrinella Linn. * Emberiza cia Linn. * Emberiza hortulana Linn. * Cynchramus scheeniclus Boie. * Plectrophanes lapponicus Selby. * Alauda arvensis Linn. * Alauda arborea Linn. * Otocoris alpestris Bonap. * Melanocorypha calandra Boie. * Galerida cristata Boie. * Agrodroma campestris Swains. * Anthus arboreus Bechst. * Anthus pratensis Bechst. * Anthus spinoletta Bonap. * Anthus obscurus Keys. et Blas. * Budytes flava Bonap. * Motacilla alba Linn. * Motacilla Yarrellii Gould. * Oriolus galbula Linn. * Turdus merula Linn. * Turdus torquatus Linn. * Turdus pilaris Linn. * Turdus viscivorus Linn. [May 5, 1869.} * Turdus musicus Linn. * Rubecula familiaris Blyth. * Philomela luscinia Selby. * Cyanecula suecica Brehm. * Ruticilla phoenicura Bonap. * Ruticilla tithys Brehm. * Saxicola cenanthe Bechst. * Pratincola rubetra Koch. * Pratincola rubicola Koch. * Prunella modularis Vieill. * Sylvia atricapilla Scop. * Sylvia hortensis Lath. * Curruca garrula Briss. * Curruca orphea Boie. Curruca cinerea Briss. Curruca melanocephala Boie. Hypolais icterina Z. Gerbe. Hypolais olivetorum Z. Gerbe. Hypolais eleica Z. Gerbe. Calamoherpe turdoides Boie. Calamoherpe arundinacea Boie. Calamoherpe palustris Boie. Locustella naevia Degl. n. Calamodyta phragmitis Mey et Wolf. Troglodytes parvulus Koch. Phyllopneuste trochilus Brehm. Phyllopneuste rufa Bonap. Phyllopneuste sibilatrix Brehm. Regulus cristatus Charlet. Regulus ignicapillus Licht. Parus major Linn. Parus ater Linn. Parus ceruleus Linn. Orites caudatus G. R. Gray. Panurus biarmicus Koch. Muscicapa nigra Briss. Butalis grisola Boie. Hirundo rustica Linn. Chelidon urbica Boie. Cotyle riparia Boie. Cypselus apus Il. Cypselus melba II]. Caprimulgus europzeus Linn. Columba palumbus Linn. Columba cenas Linn. Columba livia Briss. * * * HK KK RK KK KK K KK HF KR HK KK KK KKK HK KH K K 28 {Annual Report. * Turtur auritus Ray. * Lagopus scoticus Bonap. * Lagopus mutus Leach. * Tetrao urogallus Linn. * Tetrao tetrix Linn. * Perdix greeca Briss. * Perdix rubra Briss. * Perdix petrosa Lath. * Starna cinerea Bonap. * Coturnix communis Bonnatt. * Phasianus colchicus Linn. * Otis tetrax Linn. * Glareola pratincola Leach. * Cdicnemus crepitans Temm, * Pluvialis apricarius Bonap. Charadrius hiaticula Linn. * Vanellus cristatus Meyer et Wolf. * Heematopus ostralegus Linn. * Numenius arquata Lath. * Limosa zegocephala Leach. * Scolopax rusticula Linn. * Gallinago scolopacinus Bonap. Tringa maritima Brinn. Pelidna cinclus Bonap. Machetes pugnax G. Cuv. Totanus calidris Bechst. Totanus glareola Temm. Actitis hypoleucos Boie. Phalaropus fulicarius Bonap. * Lobipes hyperboreus Steph. * Recurvirostra avocetta Linn. * Himantopus candidus Bonnatt. * Rallus aquaticus Linn. * Crex pratensis Bechst. * Porzana maruetta G. R. Gray. Gallinula chloropus Lath. Fulica atra Linn. Ardea cinerea Linn. Ardea purpurea Linn. Egretta garzetta Bonap. * Bubulcus ibis Bonap. * Buphus comatus Boie. * Ardeola minuta Bonap. * Botaurus stellaris Steph. * Nycticorax europzeus Steph. * Ciconia alba Willughb. * * * * * * Annual Report.J * Ciconia nigra Gesn. * Phatalea leucorhodia Linn. * Sula bassana Briss. Phalacrocorax carbo Leach. * Phalacrocorax cristatus Steph. * Phalacrocorax pygmzeus Dum. * Procellaria glacialis Linn. * Puffinus anglorum Boie. Puffinus obscurus Boie. * Thalassidroma pelagica Selby. * Thalassidroma Bulweri Bonap. * Stercorarius catarractes Vieill. * Stercorarius pomarinus Vieill. * Stercorarius parasiticus G. R. Gray. Larus giaucus Brinn. Larus leucopterus Ferber. Larus marinus Linn. * Larus fuscus Linn. Larus argentatus Briinn. * Larus canus Linn. Larus tridactylus Linn. * Larus ridibundus Linn. * Sterna cantiaca Gmel. * Sterna hirundo Linn. * Sterna paradisea Briinn. Sterna minuta Linn. * Hydrochelidon fissipes G. R. Gray. * Hydrochelidon nigra G. R. Gray. * Cygnus ferus Ray. 24 [May 5, * Anser cinereus Meyer. * Anser sylvestris Briss. * Tadorna Belonii Ray. * Anser erythropus Newton. * Spatula clypeata Boie * Anas boschas Linn. * Chaulelasmus strepera G. R. Gray. * Mareca penelope Selby. * Dafila acuta Eyton. * Querquedula crecca Steph. * Clangula islandica Bonap. Harelda glacialis Steph. * Somateria mollissima Boie. Oidemia nigra Flem. Oidemia fusca Flem. * Mergus merganser Linn. * Mergus serrator Linn. * Podiceps cristatus Lath. * Podiceps fluviatilis Degl. * Uria troile Lath. Uria ringvia Brinn. Uria arra Keys. et Blas. Uria grylle Lath. * Uria Mandtii Lichst. * Mergulus alle Vieill. * Fratercula arctica Vieill. * Fratercula corniculata Brandt. Alea torda Linn. BIRDS OF JAMAICA. Crotophaga ani Linn. Tyrannus griseus Vieill. Tyrannus caudifasciatus D’Orbign. Myiarchus validus Cab. Myiarchus stolidus Gosse. * Dendroica petechia Sclat. n. * Petrochelidon fulva Cab. * Progne dominicensis March. * Tachornis phcenicobia Gosse. n. * Vireo modestus Baird. * Vireo altiloquus Gray. n. * Mimus orpheus Baird. n. Phonipara Marchii Baird. Loxigilla anoxantha Sclat. Loxigilla violacea Sclat. * Certhiola flaveola Sund. * Coturniculus tixicrus Gosse. n. * Icterus leucopteryx Wagl. n. Quiscalus crassirostris Swains. * Columba leucocephala Linn. Zenaida amabilis Bonap. * Melopelia leucoptera Linn. Chameepelia passerina Swains. Ortyx virginianus Bon. ne BIRDS OF MEXICO AND LOWER CALIFORNIA. * Pitangus Derbianus Sclat. n. * Turdus Grayi Bonap. n. * Campylorhynckus affinis Xantus. n. * Cardinalis igneus Baird. n. 1869.] *® Volatinia jacarina Cab. * Harporhynchus cinereus Xantus. * Zonotrichia melanotis. n. * Cyanospiza Leclancheri. n. * Spermophila torqueola Sclat. 25 {Annual Report. * Icterus pustulatus Wagl. n. n.* Cassiculus melanicteris Swains. * Pipilo albigula Baird. n. * Todirostrum sp. indet. Tabaxo. n. n. TROCHILIDA. Ramphodon nevius Cab. & Hein. n. Glaucis hirsuta Gould. n. Glaucis mazeppa Reich. n. Phzethornis eurynome Gould. n. Pygmornis eremita Gould. n. Pygmornis rufiventris Gould. n. Eupetomena macroura Gould. n. Sphenoproctus pampa Gould. n. Campylopterus hemileucurus Cab. & Hein. n. Aphantochroa cirrhochloris Cab. & Hein. n. Lampornis mango Cab. & Hein. n. Lampornis gramineus Cab. & Hein. n. Eulampis jugularis Cab. & Hein. n. Eulampis holosericeus Bonap. n. Aithurus polytmus Gould. n. Thalurania glaucopis Bonap. n. Thalurania furcata Bonap. n. Florisuga mellivora Bonap. n. Florisuga fusca Cab. & Hein. n. Lophornis ornatus Gould. n. Lophornis magnifica Bonap. n. Lophornis chalybea Gould. n. Gouldia Langsdorffii Bonap. n. * Trochilus colubris Linn. n. e. Mellisuga minima Bonap. n. Calypte Costz Gould. n. Calypte Anna Gould. n. Selasphorus platycercus Bonap. n. Calothorax lucifer Gray. n. Cheetocercus Mulsantii C. & Hein. n. Cheetocercus Rosze G. R. Gray. n. Calliphlox amethystina Gould. n. Pterophanes Temminckii C. & H. n. Agleactis cupripennis Sclat. n. Rhamphomicrus Stanleyi Sclat. n. Metallura tyrianthina Reich. n. Avocettula recurvirostris Bonap. n. Chrysolampis moschitus Boie. n. Orthorhynchus exilis Reich. n. Cephalolepis Delalandii Sclat. n. Clais Guimetii Sclat. n. Augastes superbus Bonap. n. Petasophora serrirostris Gray. n. Petasophora anais Gould. n. Polytmus viridissimus Gould. n. Patagona gigas Gould. n. Heliangelus clarissee Cab. & Hein. Clytolema rubinea Gould. n. Eriocnemis vestita Bonap. n. Eriocnemis Alinze Cab. & Hein. Eriocnemis Luciani Gould. n. Leucochloris albicollis Reich. Agyrtria niveipectus Cab. & Hien. n. Agyrtria Milleri Cab. & Hein. n. Agyrtria brevirostris Cab. & Hein. n. Agyrtria albiventris Cab. & Hein. n. Agyrtria maculata Cab. & Hein. n. Amazilia beryllina Gould. n. Eucephala cyanogenys Gould. n. Chlorostilbon phaethon C. & Hein. n Chlorostilbon prasinus Gould. n. Nn. MISCELLANEOUS. * Cacicus cristatus Gmel. n. * Rhynchotus rufescens Wagl. * Rhea americana Lath. * Struthio camelus Linn. * Dromaius Novee-Hollandis Vieill. Sphenezcus gramineus Gould. n. * Gallinula phoenicura Penn. * Ploceus philippinensis Linn. n. * Ploceus ocularis Smith. n. * Ploceus baya Blyth? n. Orthotomus longicauda Strickl. n. Nectarinia metallica Licht.? n. Fiscus collaris Linn. n. * Collocalia nidificans Lath. n. Annual Report.] 26 [May 5, The Curatorship of Reptiles was left vacant early in the year by Dr. Wilder’s acceptance of a Professorship in Cornell University ; the Curator subsequently chosen in his place leay- ing for the south soon after his election, has only just returned. He reports the collection to be in excellent condition, but poorly represented even in our own reptiles; much labelling remains to be done, and the proper identification of the species is not completed. The Curator proposes to supply temporarily some deficiencies in the representation of the Massachusetts species, from the unlabelled specimens laid aside for anatomi- cal purposes. He will also revise the whole collection with care, and have skeletons prepared from the duplicates to illus- trate the bony framework of at least each family. The collection has been rearranged in the new gallery devoted to it, and although not fully prepared for public inspection, has been on exhibition for the first time during the past week. In the new room devoted to Fishes, and recently opened to the public, the specimens have been reassorted in glass jars and arranged in extended faunal divisions: thus, the species from the fresh waters of North America, east of the Rocky Mountains, form one collection; the marine fishes of the Atlantic shores, north of Cape Hatteras a second ; those from the south of Cape Hatteras to Brazil a third, and the species of the Hawaiian Islands a fourth. The collection con- tains more than one thousand numbers, which have all been entered in the catalogue, and in many instances the species identified and recorded under their proper names; but al- though the collection is in a safe and accessible condition, it cannot be considered in proper order until every jar shall have its label for the information of visitors. It will re- quire more time than the Curator can afford to identify and name all the specimens; and, unless some special arrangement can be made, this work must necessarily proceed very slowly. The collection is very deficient in the sea fishes of our neigh-~ borhood, and a large outlay would be necessary to complete it. 1869.] ii f {Annual Report. In the Entomological department Mr. P. 8. Sprague has spent much time upon the Carabide, and we are indebted to Dr. LeConte, Dr. Horn and others, for identifying many species sent to them. Rev. Mr. Trask, Mr. Stebbins and Miss Sanborn have also assisted in various ways, both in this and in other departments. Mr. Sanborn has rearranged the Hemiptera of the Harris collection in the new cabinets, a few additional trays of specimens have been placed on exhibition, and about two thousand butterflies from Central America spread, and thus made available for exchange. Much atten- tion has been given to the preservation of the collections, which, although not yet in the most desirable condition, are greatly in advance of their state a year ago. Most of the additions to this department have been made in small quanti- ties by many persons. Some interesting East Indian Lepi- doptera have been received in exchange from Mr. A. 8. Bick- more, and Dr. C. F. Waters has constantly added new objects from our own vicinity. The lower Articulates remain in good condition. A num- ber of species of Cancroids and Grapsoids, sent to Mr. S. I. Smith of New Haven, for study, have been carefully labelled and returned; the Astaci have also passéd through the hands of Dr. Hagen of Cambridge. Thirty-six specimens of fifteen Species of Crustacea, from various parts of America, have been received, in exchange, from the Museum of Yale Col- lege. A portion of the new room devoted to the department of Mollusks, has been placed in order and opened to the public. In the month of January an arrangement was made with the Curator to devote one half of the year to the collections under his charge; in consequence, more than one thousand tablets have already been arranged and placed on exhibition. The Curator’s entire attention has been given to the Pratt collection, and its arrangement will be completed before he proceeds to other work. From what he has seen of the Soci- Annual Report.] 28 [May 5, ety’s old collection, he regrets to state that it is even in worse condition than he had supposed. Nearly all the type speci- mens of Mighels, Gould, and others are missing; very many tablets are empty, while specimens are not infrequently mis- placed. When a newly-appointed Curator finds his collection in a disorganized condition, much time must be spent in prelimi- nary work; this was the case with the last Curator, and although he gave two consecutive months of attention to the collection, it did not suffice to restore anything like order. The subsequent removal of the specimens to their new room, required a repetition of much of the old labor. With the exception of the work done by the last incumbent, there is — no evidence of any attention bestowed upon the specimens for the last fifteen years, during which time the Curator has been familiar with the collection; it is now in a worse condition than it was years ago, showing, that in this case, gratuitous aid has proved a failure ; and any one who has passed his eve- nings and holidays in arranging a small private cabinet will appreciate the amount of time which an extensive public col- lection will require, where all the groups must receive im- partial attention, and new donations be placed upon exhibi- tion at the earliest moment. The Curator considers the upright wall cases in which the shells are arranged as entirely unsuitable for the display of the dry collection; the very nature of such objects requires their exhibition in horizontal cases, where they may be seen from above. He knows of but one other museum in the coun- try where an upright arrangement is adopted, and there only from lack of room,—to be remedied at the earliest possible moment. The Society is indebted to Dr. J. W. Newcomb and Mr. R. E. C. Stearns for assistance they have rendered in identi- fying and labelling Mollusks from the Hawaiian Islands and the west coast of America. An effort will be made during the coming year to complete the collection of Massachusetts 1869.] 29 [Annual Report. Mollusks, and the Curator solicits material for this purpose. The collection lacks all the smaller species, whether from land, sea, or river. Nearly five hundred species of Mollusks from various local- ities determined by the late Mr. Cuming, have been pre- sented by the Smithsonian Institution; a valuable dona- tion of fifty-one species of deep-water Mollusks from our own coast, has been received from Mr. E. R. Mayo, and ninety- seven specimens of thirty-three Florida Mollusks from Mr. R. E. C. Stearns. The collection of Radiates has not been greatly increased during the year; the most important additions are a small collection of starfishes from California, presented by Mr. R. E. C. Stearns, and a series of typical specimens of corals and echinoderms, mostly of species described by the Curator and sent by the Museum of Yale College, in exchange. A number of Echini have been borrowed by Mr. Alexan- der Agassiz for monographic work, and the condition of the collection is generally satisfactory. The Echinoderms are all identified and catalogued, although the final labels remain unwritten; the corals have been mostly identified, and about half catalogued; the collection would be improved if all the corals were mounted in their natural position, and atten- tion will be given to this point during the year. The Curator begs leave to state that numerous species of Radiates on our own coast, especially among the Hydroids, Ophiurans, and small starfishes still remain unrepresented. The specimens in the department of Microscopy are in good condition ; there is much rough material in the Bailey Collection ready at any time to be made use of by those in- terested in diatoms. - Little has been done to the Paleontological collections ; near- ly all the specimens are still mounted on the old plaster trays, which do not form an agreeable contrast to the new tablets and > Annual Report.] 30 (May 5, labels of the neighboring departments. The Trenton Lime- stone fossils have, however, been newly mounted and rela- belled with the old names. The collection, even in its present meagre representation of past epochs, requires the attention of one person for several months in the year to revise the nomenclature, and relabel and catalogue the specimens. The most important addition consists of a series of casts of twenty- eight species of fossils (mostly cretaceous) received from the Smithsonian Institution. The department of Geology has been enriched by a collec- tion of more than five hundred named specimens of rocks, purchased from Dr. Krantz of Bonn. The local collections of volcanic products are mostly labelled and arranged in cases, and the systematic collection of rocks has been rearranged. The economic collections have not increased to the extent hoped for by the Curator, and although architects and pro- prietors of quarries have promised specimens, none have been received during the year. A new case has been placed in the room, but the Curator deems the additional facilities of gal- lery cases needed for a proper display of the collection under his care. The Curator of Mineralogy reports that he has rearranged nearly all the specimens in his department, in order to carry out his plan of having the collection correspond in system with that of the recent edition of Dana’s Mineralogy. He has .also adopted the new system of labelling introduced in other parts of the Museum, and the extent of his work can be estimated, from the fact that about two thousand seven hundred specimens are on exhibition. He expects to com- plete the task before another annual meeting. As usual, the department is indebted to Dr. C. T. Jackson for many valu- able specimens. I cannot trust myself to dwell on the loss which has befallen - the Society in the sudden death of our Curator of Botany; a 1869.) 31 [Annual Report. we cannot penetrate the mystery of his early decease, nor estimate the value of his counsel and the increasing import- ance of his aid. Mr. Mann’s life was so rich in promise, his heart so full of generous impulse, his judgment so mature, that he was endeared to us all. We have looked in vain for his successor, and long shall we lament our loss. The collec- tion remains as he left it, and but few additions have been received during the year. This closes our review of the Society’s operations for the past year. We would pass on to the next with better hope were we not encumbered by the embarrassments of which the Treasurer will shortly speak. or an institution like ours the expenditures of the past twelve months have certainly not been extravagant; all of them seem highly desirable, and we are forced to the conclusion that larger means are absolutely essential to our prosperity and growth. We have taken a high stand among Societies of a kindred nature in this coun- try, but unless our income is nearly doubled we cannot retain it. Two things are urgently required,—more money and a larger staff of assistants; otherwise, in receiving such large additions as have been sent to us since our removal to the present site, without the corresponding monetary bequests, we shall be overwhelmed in the course of a few years by our own external prosperity. Annual Report.] 32 [May 5, LETTERS RECEIVED DURING THE YEAR ENDING APRIL 30, 1869. From the Académie Royale des Sciences, etc., de Belgique, Bruxelles, Septem- ber 14th, 1867; Bibliotheca Universitatis Lugduno-Batave, October 22d, 1867; Bataafsch Genootschap der Proefondervindelijke Wijsbegeerte te Rotterdam, October 23d, 1567; Bureau de la Recherche Géologique de la Suéde, Stock- holm, December 31st, 1867; Director of the Real Gymnasium und Ober- Realschule, St. Polten, December, 1867; Office of the Geological Survey of India; Der Nassauischer Verein, Wiesbaden, January 6th, 1868; K. K. zoolo- gisch-botanische Gesellschaft, Wien, January, 1868, and February, 1869; Madras Literary Society, March, 1868; Utrecht Society of Arts and Sciences, March, 1868; Smithsonian Institution, April 6th, June 26th, August 8th and December 12th, 1868; Massachusetts Horcicultural Society, June ist and June 26th, 1868; Royal Society of London, April 20th, 1868; Naturforschende Gesell- schaft, Freiburg, May 3d, 1868; Société des sciences physiques et naturelles du Département d’Lle et Vilaine, Rennes, May 27th, 1868; Museum at Bergen, May z8th and October 10th, 1868; Essex Institute, Salem, Mass., May 29th, June 26th, August 5th, October 28th, November 24th, December 14th, 1868, January 16th, February 3d, March 12th and April 14th, 1869; Naturforschende Gesell- schaft in Bern, May, 1868; Lyceum of Natural History, New York, June ist and July 15th, 1868, February 8th, March 1st, April 6th and April 12th, 1869; Massachusetts Institute of Technology, June 2d and 23d, and August 13th, 1868, April 19th, 1869; Institute of Natural Science, Halifax, N.S., June 8th, 1868; New York State Agricultural Society, Albany, June 16th, 1868; Acad- emy of Sciences of Chicago, June 18th, 1868, and April 29th, 1869; Massachu- seits Historical Society, Boston, June 27th and Sept. 8th, 1868, and April, 1869; Public Library of the City of Boston, June 27th and December 10th, 1868; Schweizerische Gesellschaft, Bern, June, 1868; Amherst College Library, June, 1868; Regents of the University of the State of New York, Albany, July 3d, 1868; Corporation of Harvard College, Cambridge, July 20th, 1868, and April 6th, 1869; Linnean Society, London, July 22d, 1868; Société Hollandaise des Sciences & Harlem, September 11th, 1868; Société Royale des Sciences a Upsal, September 15th, 1868: Cercle Artistique, Littéraire et Scientifique d’Anvers, September 26th, 1868; Académie Royale des Sciences & Amsterdam, October 18th, 1868; Naturforschende Gesellschaft des Osterlandes zu Altenburg, Octo- ber 15th, 1868; Corporation of Williams College, Williamstown, October 20th, 1868, and April 20th, 1869; the Natural History and Medical Reunion at Heidel- berg, October 21st, 1868; Physikalisch-medizinische Gesellschaft in Wiirzburg, October 24th, 1868; Gesellschaft ziir Beforderung der Naturwissenschaften zu Freiburg i. B., October 24th, 1868; Naturforschende Gesellschaft, Basel, October 30th, 1868; Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge, November 13th, 1868, 1869.] 83 [Annual Report. March 8th and April 9th, 1869; American Philosophical Society, Philadelphia, November 18th, 1868 and March 8th, 1869; Institut National Genevois, Genéve, November 14th, 1868; Finska Lakare-Sdllskapet, Helsingfors, November 15th, 1867; Zodlogical Society of London, November 10th, 1868; Prof. A. de Bary, Director of the Botanical Garden of the University of Halle, November 10th, 1868; Royal Institution, London, November 18th, 1868; Editors of the Neues Jahrbuch fiir Mineralogie, Stuttgart, November 4th, 1868; Literary and Philo- sophical Society of Manchester, November 11th, 1868; K. K. Centralanstalt fiir Meteorologie und Erdmagnetismus in Wien, November 26th, 1868; Belfast Nat- ural History, etc., Society, December 4th, 1868; Royal Horticultural Society, London, January, 1869; Royal Society of Edinburgh, January 5th, 1869; Anthropological Society of London, January 20th, 1869; Naturforschende Gesellschaft, Gorlitz, January 27th, 1869; Naturforschender Verein, Dessau, January, 1869; Portland Society of Natural History, April Gth, 17th and 30th, 1869; American Antiquarian Society, Worcester, Mass., April 6th, 1869, acknowledging the receipt of the Society’s publications. From the K. preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin, December 31st, 1867; Bureau de la Recherche Géologique de la Suéde, December 3ist, 1867, and June 15th, 1868; Manchester Scientific Students’ Association, 1868; Nassau- ischer Verein fir Naturkunde, Wiesbaden, January 6th, 1868; Superintendent of the Geological Survey of India, Calcutta, January 8th, 1868: Verein fiir sieben- birgische Landeskunde, January 24th, 1868; Naturhistorische Gesellschaft zu Hannover, February 2d, 1868; Société Entomologique des Pays-Bas, Leide, Ieb- ruary 12th, 1868; Naturforschender Verein zu Riga, February 18th, 1868; K. K. zoologisch-botanische Gesellschaft, Wien, February 25th, 1868; Utrecht Society of Arts and Sciences, March, 1868; Académie Impériale des Sciences, Belles- Lettres, ete., de Lyon, April 10th, 1868; Universidad de Chile, April 15th, 1868; K. Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien, April 23d and August 26th, 1868; Société Entomologique de France, Paris, April 25th, 1868; Oberhessische Gesell- schaft fiir Natur- und Heilkunde, April 27th, 1868; Académie Royale des Sciences, etc., Bruxelles, April 27th, 1868; K. bohmische Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften, May 14th, 1868; Société Hollandaise des Sciences, Harlem, May 20th, 1868; Batavian Society, Rotterdam, May, 1868; Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C., June Ist, 1868; Société Impériale d’Agriculture de Moscou, June ist, 1868; K. K. geographische Gesellschaft, Wien, June 30th, 1868; Naturfor- schende Gesellschaft in Bern, June, 1868; Schweizerische naturforschende Gesellschaft, Bern, June, 1868; Naturforscher-Verein zu Riga, July 13th, 1868; Académie Impériale des Sciences, Belles-Lettres, etc., Lyon, July 15th, 1868; So- ciété Linnéene de Lyon, July 15th, 1868; W. Hunter, Acting Secretary of State, in behalf of A. Mazel, Minister from the Netherlands to the United States, August 8th, 1868; Société Royale des Sciences & Upsal, August ist and Septem- ber 15th, 1868; Schlesische Gesellschaft fiir vaterlandische Cultur, Breslau, August 15th, 1868; Museum Francisco- Carolinum, Linz, August 19th, 1868; _ Académie Royale des Sciences 4 Amsterdam, September 2d, 1868; K. Leopol- dino-Carolinische deutsche Academie der Naturforscher, Dresden, September, 1868; Naturhistorische Gesellschaft, Niirnberg, October Ist, 1868; Geological and PROCEEDINGS B. S. N. H.—VOL. XIII. SEPTEMBER, 1869. Annual Report.] 34. [May 5, Polytechnic Society of the West Riding of Yorkshire, Leeds, October 16th, 1868; Wetterauische Gesellschaft fiir die gesammte Naturkunde zu Hanau, November 11th, 1868; Université Royale a Christiania, November, 1868; Mannheimer Verein fir Naturkunde, November, 1868; K. Preussische Akademie der Wissen- shaften, Berlin, December 28th, 1868; Medizinisch-naturwissenschaftliche Gesellschaft, zu Jena, January 29th, 1869; Prof. C. M. Von Siebold, Leipzig, February 15th, 1869; Belfast Natural History and Philosophical Society, Febru- ary 17th, 1869, presenting their various publications. From the Gesellschaft naturforschender Freunde zu Berlin, February 7th, 1868; Société d’ Agriculture, etc., de la Sarthe, Le Mans, March Ist, 1868; Natur- forschende Gesellschaft, Gorlitz, March 8th, 1868; Naturforschende Gesellschaft in Danzig, June 2d, 1868; Société Impériale Géographique, St. Petersburg, July 13th, 1868; Royal Society of Northern Antiquaries, Copenhagen, Septem- ber Ist, 1868; K. K. geologische Reichsanstalt, Wien, October 16th, 1868; Obperhessische Gesellschaft fiir Natur- und Heilkunde, Giessen, October 24th, 1868; Meklenburgischer patriotischer Verein, Rostock, October 25th, 1868; Société de Physique et d’Histoire Naturelle de Genéve, November ist, 1868; Die Pollichia, Diirkheim, November 20th, 1868; Société d’Histoire Naturelle de Strasbourg, December 10th, 1868; K. Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Gotiingen, January, 1869; Société Royale Linnéenne de Bruxelles, February 15th, 1869; Royal Physical Society of Edinburgh, March 8th, 1869; Edward Newman, Esq., London, Eng., March 11th, 1869; Société Linnéenne de Bordeaux, March 12th, 1869, acknowledging the receipt of the Society’s publications, and presenting their own. From the Geographical Society of Berlin, December 20th, 1868, acknowledg- ing the receipt of the Society’s publications, and accepting the proposition to exchange. From the Oekonomische Gesellschaft, Dresden, April 8th, 1868, presenting its publications and accepting the offer of exchange. From the K. Norske Universitet, December 7th, 1868, presenting publications and asking exchange. From the Société Littéraire du Brabant Septentrional 4 Bois le Duc, Novem- ber 17th, 1868; Ministére de la Marine et des Colonies, Paris, December 16th, 1868; Société des Sciences Physiques et Naturelles de Bordeaux, January 12th, 1869; Verein fiir vaterlandische Naturkunde in Wirttemberg, Stuttgart, Febru- ary 15th, 1869, acknowledging the receipt of the Society’s publications, present- ing their own, and asking that missing numbers of the Society’s publications may be sent to them. From the Bataafsch Genootschap der Proefondervindelijke Wijsbegeerte te Rotterdam, September 29th, 1868, acknowledging the receipt of the Society’s publications, and offering to complete the set of its own publications in the possession of the Society. From the Universitas Lugduno-Batava, September 14th, 1868; and from Sefior Felipe Poey, Havana, September 19th, 1868, acknowledging the receipt of the Society’s publications, and promising to supply deficiencies in the publi- - cations heretofore received by the Society from them. From the Société des Sciences de Finlande, Helsingfors, November 30th, 1868, 1869.] 35 [Annual Report. and from the Schlesische Gesellschaft fiir vaterlandische Cultur, Breslau, De- cember 2d, 1868, acknowledging the receipt of the Society’s publications, and regretting inability to supply deficiencies in the publications heretofore trans- mitted to the Society. From the K. K. zoologisch-botanische Gesellschaft, Wien, November 23d, 1868, presenting its publications, regretting its inability to furnish publications asked for by the Society, and asking that missing numbers of the publications transmitted by the Society may be supplied. From the K. K. zoologisch-botanische Gesellschaft, Wien, October 12th, 1867; Naturhistorischer Verein der preussischen Rheinlande und Westphalens, - Bonn, March Ist, 1868; Verein fur vaterlandische Naturkunde in Wiirttemberg, Stuttgart, April 12th, 1868; Superintendent of the Geological Survey of India, Calcutta, May 20th, 1869; Andrew Murray, Esq., London, November, 1868; Institut Impérial de France, Paris, December 5th, 1868; and the Société d’ Agri- culture, Sciences et Arts de la Sarthe, Le Mans, February 27th, 1869, acknowl- edging the receipt of the Society’s publications, and asking that missing numbers may be supplied. From the Société Entomologique de France, Paris, April 16th, 1869, acknowl- edging the receipt of the Society’s publications, asking for missing numbers, and promising to complete the series of its publications in the possession of the Society so far as possible. From the Société Linnéenne de Bordeaux, March 17th, 1869, asking that de- ficiencies in their series of the Society’s publications may be supplied to them, and promising to reciprocate. From the Royal Geographical Society, London, January 4th, 1869, presenting some of the back numbers of its publications. From Dr. H. Loew, Meseritz, Prussia, February 28th, 1868; Prof. O. C. Marsh, New Haven, Conn., July 6th, 1868; Prof. William H. Brewer, New Haven, Conn., July 22d, 1868; Prof. T. Eulenstein, Dresden, Saxony, October 5th, 1868; Prof. Burt. G. Wilder, Cornell University, Ithaca, N. Y,, January 24th, 1869; Prof. Charles Wedl, Vienna, Austria, February 20th, 1869, in acknowledgment of their election as Corresponding Members. From Dr. Christopher Kollock, Cheraw, N. C., June 22d and October 21st, 1868; Henry Davis, Money Creek, Minnesota, October 27th, 1868; and John W. M. Appleton, Waldingfield, W. Va., November 5th, 1868, offering specimens to the Society, etc.; A. A. Gautier, Chevalier de la Légion d’Honneur, Paris, September 30th, 1868, a circular concerning the cultivation of the Potato; Dr. C. A. Martius, Miinchen, December 15th, 1868, announcing the death of Dr. Carl Friedrich Philipp von Martius; Biological Department of the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, February 25th, 1869, a circular concerning the objects of the department; the University of Vermont, Burlington, March 9th, 1869, in acknowledgment of having been placed on the list of Institutions to which the Society’s publications are sent. Annual Report.) 36 [May 5, ADDITIONS TO THE LIBRARY DURING THE YEAR ENDING APRIL 30, 1869. A Guide to the Study of Insects. By A. S. Packard, Jr., M.D. Parts 1- vi. 8vo. Salem, 1868-9. From the Author. Annual Meteorological Synopsis for the year 1867. By J. B. Trembley, M. D., in the city of Toledo, Ohio. 8vo. Pamph. From the Author. A System of Mineralogy. By James Dwight Dana, aided by George Jarvis Brush. 5th Edition. 8vo. New York, 1868. From the Author. Queries on the Red Sandstone of Vermont, and its Relations to other Rocks. By the Rev. John B. Perry. 8vo. Pamph. Boston, 1868. From the Author. Notes on certain Terrestrial Mollusca, with Descriptions of new Species. By Thomas Bland. 8vo. Pamph. New York, 1868. From the Author. The Institutes of Medicine. By Martyn Paine, M. D. 8vo. New York, 1867. From the Author. Contributions to the Mineralogy of Nova Scotia. By Professor How. 111. 8vo. Pamph. 1868. From the Author. Catalogue of the Phzenogamous Plants of the United States east of the Mississippi, and of the Vascular Cryptogamous Plants of North America, north of Mexico. By Horace Mann. 8vo. Pamph. Boston, 1868. From the Author. Mr. Meek’s Notes on my Preliminary Report of the Geology of Kansas, as edited by Dr. Hayden. By Prof. G. C. Swallow. 8vo. Pamph. St. Louis, 1868. From the Author. On some Cretaceous Fossil Plants from Nebraska. By Leo Lesquereux. 8vo. Pamph. Columbus, 1868. From the Author. Céphalopodes Siluriens de la Bohéme. Groupement des Orthocéres. Par Joachim Barrande. 8vo. Pamph. Paris, 1868. From the Author. Derivative Hypothesis of Life and Species. By Professdr Owen. 8vo. Pamph. London, 1868. From the Author. Capillar-Blut undefibrinirtes zur Transfusion. Von Dr. med. Franz Ge- sellius. 8vo. Pamph. St. Petersburg, 1868. rom the Author. Outlines of Comparative Anatomy and Medical Zodlogy. By Harrison Allen, M.D. 8vo. Philadelphia, 1869. rom the Author. Mutillarum novarum species aliquot. Auctore H. de Saussure. 8yo. Pamph. Paris, 1867. From the Author. Notes on the later extinct Floras of North America. By J. S. Newberry. 8vo. Pamph. New York, 1867. From the Author. “ti The Pampas and Andes. A Thousand Miles’ Walk across South America. By Nathaniel H. Bishop. 12mo. Boston, 1869. From the Author. Action of Ansesthetics on the Blood Corpuscles. By J. H. McQuillen, M. D. 8vo. Pamph. Philadelphia, 1869. From the Author. Introduction to Zoology. By Robert Patterson, F.R.S. i16mo. Belfast, 1866. From the Author. 1869.] 37 [Annvel Report. On the Geology and Silver Ore of Wood’s Location, Thunder Cape, Lake Superior. By Thos. Macfarlane. 8yo. Pamph. Actonvale, 1869. From the Author. Die Vegetationsverhdltnisse von Croatien. Von Dr. August Neilreich. 8vo. Wien, 1868. From the Author. : Die Zoophyten und Kchinodermen des Adriatischen Meeres. Von Prof. Cam. Heller. 8vo. Pamph.~ Wien, 1868. rom the Author. On the Origin of Genera. By Edward D. Cope, A. M. 8vo. Pamph. Philadelphia, 1869. From the Author. Flora Brasiliensis. Edidit Carolus Fridericus Philippus de Martius. Fasc 44-46. Folio. Lipsiae, 1868. From Mrs. B. D. Greene. Annual Report of the Surgeon-General, United States Army. 8vo. Pamph. Washington, 1868. From the Surgeon-General. California Wine, Wool and Stock Journal. J. Q. A. Warren, Editor. Vol. 1. 4to. San Francisco, 1863. From the Editor. Geological and Natural History Survey of North Carolina. Part 11. Bot- any, by Rey. M. A. Curtis, D. D. 8vo. Raleigh, 1867. From C. J. Sprague. Report on the State of the Militia of the Province of Canada, for the year 1867. 8vo. Ottawa, 1868. From L. A. H. Latour. Forty-eighth Annual Report of the Mercantile Library Association of the City of Boston. 8vo. Pamph. 1868. From the Association. The Galaxy, Vol. v, No.6. 8vo. New York, 1868. From the Publishers. Drawing of Cypreza. From Mr. G. W. Pratt. The Journal of the Franklin Institute. 3d Series. _ Vol. tv1, No.1. 8vo. Philadelphia, 1868. From the Institute. American Cervus, by John D. Caton. 8vo. Pamph. Ottawa, 1868. From Mr. B. D. Walsh. Photographs of Macherodon. From Mr. J. Dorr. A General Catalogue of Books, arranged in Classes, offered for sale by Ber- nard Quaritch. 8vo. London, 1868. From Mr. Bernard Quaritch. Beitrag zur Kentniss der mikroskopischen Fauna jurassiseher Schichten. Von Conrad Schwager. 8vo. Pamph. Stuttgart, 1865. From Dr. C. F. Winslow. : Catalogue of the Officers and Students in Yale College, 1868-69. 8vo. Pamph. New Haven, 1868. rom the Trustees of Yale College. Hawaiian Club Papers. Edited by a Committee of the Club. 8vo. Boston, 1868. From Mr. William T. Brigham. Ueber Capillargefaszsysteme von Gasteropoden. Von. Prof. Dr. C. Wedl. 8vo. Pamph. Wien, 1868. From Dr. F. H. Brown. The Missisquoi Springs and their wonderful Cures. 12mo. Pamph. New York. From the Proprietors of the Springs. : Acts and Resolves passed by the General Court of Massachusetts, in the years 1864-68. 8vo. Boston. rom Mr. Alanson Hawley. The Athenzum. 1850, Vol. 1; 1851, m-1v; 1852, 1-111; 1853, 1-11: 1854, mm. 4to. London. From Mr. N. L. Hooper. Public Library of Cincinnati. Rules, By-Laws and other Items, with Annual Reports. 8vo. 1868. From the Trustees. Annual Report.] 38 [May 5, The Inaugural Address of Nathaniel B. Shurtleff, Mayor of Boston, to the City Council, January 4, 1869. 8vo. Boston, 1869. From the City of Boston. An Act to aid in the preservation of Birds, Birds’ Eggs and Deer. Senate, No. 111. The same, Senate, No. 191. 8vo. Pamph. Boston, 1868. From Mr. H. A. Purdie. Free Public Library of the City of New Bedford. Seventeenth Annual Re- port of the Trustees. 8vo. 1869. Supplement to the Catalogue. 8vo. 1869. From the Trustees. Geology of New Jersey. George H. Cook, State Geologist. 8vo. Newark, 1868. Map, 4to. From the Board of Managers of the Survey. North-West Territory. Report on the Assiniboine and Saskatchewan Explor- ing Expedition, by Henry Youle Hind, M. A. 4to. Toronto, 1859. From Mr. C. S. Minot. Reports of the Commissioners of Fisheries of the State of Maine, for the years 1867 and 1868. 8vo. Augusta, 1869. From the Commissioners. Report of the Commissioner of Agriculture and Arts of the Province of On- tario, for the year 1868. 8vo. Toronto, 1869. From the Commissioner. A Concise History of High Rock Spring. By Henry McGuier. 16mo. Pamph. Albany, 1868. From Dr. 8S. Kneeland. Photographs of Japanese. From Mr. C. K. Dillaway. Offenes Schreiben an Herrn Franz Maurer, als Erwiederung auf dessen Schmihschrift ‘“ Nicobariana.’’ 8vo. Pamph. Berlin, 1868. From M. Georg Ritter von Frauenfeld. Protection a Boon to Consumers. Address before the National Association of Knit Goods Manufacturers, May 1, 1867. By John L. Hayes. 8vo. Boston, 1867. The Fleece and the Loom. Address before the National Association of Wool Manufacturers, Sept. 6, 1865. By the same. 8vo. Boston, 1865. From the Author. List of Birds collected in Southern Arizona by Dr. E. Palmer; with remarks. By Dr. Elliot Coues, U.S. A. 8vo. Pamph. Philadelphia, 1868. A Monograph of the Alcidz. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. Philadelphia, 1868. From the Author. On Sussexite, a new borate from Mine Hill, Franklin Furnace, Sussex Co., N. J. By George J. Brush. 8vo. Pamph. New Haven, 1868. Catalogue of Meteorites in the Mineralogical Collection of Yale College. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. New Haven, 1869. From the Author. Descriptions of twelve new species of Unionidae from South America, etc. By Isaac Lea. 8vo. Pamph. Philadelphia, 1868. Observations on the Genus Unio. By Isaac Lea, LL.D. Vol. XII. 4to. Philadelphia. From the Author. Rapport sur Jes Phénoménes Chimiques de l’Eruption de Etna en 1865. Par M. F. Fougué. 4to. Pamph. Paris, 1866. 1839.] &9 [Annual Report. Rapport sur les Tremblements de Terre de Céphalonie et de Mételin en 1867. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. Paris, 1867. Premier Rapport sur une Mission scientifique 4 l’Ne Santorin. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. Paris, 1867. From the Author. On the Origin of the so-called Lignilites or Epsomites. By Prof. O. C. Marsh. fvo. Pamph. New Haven, 1867. - Observations on the Metamorphosis of Siredon into Amblystoma. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. New Haven, 1868. _ Notice of a new species of Fossil Horse. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. New Haven, 1868. From the Author. Une Ascension dans les Montagnes Rocheuses. Par J. Marcou. 8vo. Pamph. Paris, 1867. Notice sur les Cartes Géologiques de Victoria (Australie) et des Iles Britan- niques. By thesame. 8vo. Pamph. Paris, 1868. Distribution Géographique de l’Or et de l’Argent aux Etats-Unis et dans les Canadas. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. Paris, 1867. From the Author. Description of a new Pseudomorpha from California, with notes on the Pseu- domorphide. By Geo. H. Horn, M.D. 8vo. Pamph. Philadelphia, 1867. Geotrupes of Boreal America. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. Philadelphia, 1868. Catalogue of Coleoptera from South Western Virginia. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. Philadelphia, 1868. From the Author. Descriptions of American Lepidoptera. No.3. By A. R. Grote and C. T. Robinson. 8vo. Philadelphia, 1868. Notes on the N. A. Lepidoptera contained in the British Museum, and de- scribed by Francis Walker. By thesame. 8vo. Pamph. Philadelphia, 1868. List of the Lepidoptera of North America. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. Philadelphia, 1868. From the Authors. Symbole Sirenologicz. Auctore Johanne Friderico Brandt. 4to. Petrop- oli, 1861-8. Ueber eine neue Abbildung der Steller’schen Seekuh. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. St. Petersburg, 1867. Bericht iber den zweiten und dritten Fascikel der Symbole Sirenologice. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. 1867. Ueber die systematische Stellung und die Verwandtschaften des Dodo (Didus ineptus). By the same. 8vo. Pamph. St. Petersburg, 1867. rom the Author. De la Classification de certains Opercules de Gastéropodes. Par M. Ch. Des- Moulins. 8vo. Pamph. Bordeaux, 1867. Lettre a M. Frangois Crépin. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. Bordeaux, 1868. Liste des principaux Fossiles recueillis par les Membres de Ja Société Linné- Annual Report. ] 49) [May 5, enne & Cazeneuve dans le Calcair de Bazas. By thesame. 8yo. Pamph. Bordeaux, 1868. Descriptions et Figures de quelques Coquilles Fossiles du Terrain Tertiare, etc. By the same. From the Author. The Ainos or Hairy Men of Yesso, Saghalien and the Kurile Islands. By Albert S. Bickmore. 8vo. Pamph. New Haven, 1868. Sketch of a Journey from Canton to Hankow, through China. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. New Haven, 1868. " $ketch of a Journey through the Interior of China. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. Shanghai, 1867. Recent Elevations in China and Japan. By the same. 8yo. Pamph. Shanghai, 1867. From the Author. Osservazioni del M. E. Prof. Ab. Cav. Franc. Zantedeschi all’ Argomento addotto all’ Ipotesi della Elettricita negativa d’Induzione, ete. 8vo. Pamph. Venezia, 1868. Dei Caratteri della Tromba terrestre accaduta nel Fruili il 28 di Luglio, 1867. By the same. 8yo. Pamph. Venezia, 1868. Della Necessita di nuovi studi meteorologici, ete. Nota del C. F. Zantedeschi. 8vo. Pamph. Venezia, 1868. Documenti intorno agli studi Spettrescopici. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. Padova, 1868. Pubbliche Date del Magnettoelettrico ed Elettromagnetico. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. Padova, 1868. La Scienza alla Esposizione Universale di Parigi nel 1867. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. Venezia, 1868. From the Author. Mimus melanopterus. By George N. Lawrence. 8vo. Pamph. New York, 1849. Observations on Mr. Bell’s Paper on the Limosa scolopacea of Say. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. New York, 1849. . On the occurrence of the Caspian Tern (Sylochelidon caspius) in North America. By thesame. 8vo. Pamph. New York, 1850. Description of a new species of Tyrannus. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. New York, 1850. Descriptions of new species of Birds of the Genera Toxastoma Wagler, Tyrannula Swainson, and Plectrophanes Meyer. By the same. 8yvo. Pamph. New York, 1851. Additions to North American Ornithology. Nos. 2-3. By the same. 8vo. New York, 1851-3. Ornithological Notes. By the same. Nos. 1-2. 8vo. New York, 1852-3. Descriptions of new species of Birds of the Genera Ortyx Stephens, Sterna Linn., and Icteria Viellot. By thesame. 8vo. Pamph. New York, 1853. Description of a new species of Bird of the Genus Larus Linn. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. New York, 1854. Description of a new species of Humming Bird of the Genus Mellisuga 19€9.] 41 [Annual Report. Brisson, with a note on Trochilus aquila Bourcier. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. New York, 1855. Descriptions of new species of Birds of the Genera Chordeiles Swainson, and Polioptila Sclater. By thesame. 8vo. Pamph. New York, 1856. Descriptions of two new species of Gulls in the Museum of the Smithsonian Institution. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. New York, 1858. Descriptions of seven new species of Humming Birds. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. New York, 1858. Observations on Gundlach’s ‘‘ Notes on some Cuban Birds.’”? By the same. 8yo. Pamph. New York, 1858. Descriptions of three new species of Humming Birds of the Genera Helio- master, Amazilia, and Mellisuga. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. New York, 1860. Description of a new species of Bird of the Genus Phaeton. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. New York, 1860. Descriptions of new species of Birds of the Genus Myiarchus and Phlogopsis. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. New York, 1860. -Notes on some Cuban Birds. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. New York, 1860. Catalogue of a Collection of Birds made in New Granada, by James McLean- nan, Esq., of New York, with notes and descriptions of new species. By the same. Parts1-rv. 8vo. New York, 1861-3. Descriptions of three new species of Birds. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. New York, 1861. Descriptions of six new species of Birds of the Families Charadride, Tro- chilide and Caprimulgide. By thesame. 8vo. Pamph. New York, 1862. Descriptions of new species of Birds of the Families Vireonide and Rallide. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. Philadelphia, 1868. Descriptions of new species of Birds of the Families Cerebids, Tanagride, Icteridse and Scolopacide. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. Philadelphia, 1864. Descriptions of new species of Birds of the Families Tanagridz, Cuculidee and Trochilide. By thesame. 8vo. Pamph. New York, 1864. Catalogue of Birds collected at the Island of Sombrero, W. I., with Observa- tions by A. A. Julien. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. New York, 1864. Descriptions of new species of Birds of the Families Paride, Vireonida, Tyrannidz and Trochilide. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. Philadelphia, 1865. Descriptions of new species of Birds of the Families Tanagridz, Dendroco- laptide, Formicaride, Tyrannide and Trochilide. By the same. 68vo. Pamph. New York, 1865. Descriptions of four new species of Birds from the Isthmus of Panama, New Granada. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. Philadelphia, 1865. Descriptions of six new species of Birds from Central America. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. New York, 1865. List of Birds from near David, eaEiauy, New Granada. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. New York, 1865. Catalogue of a ollecan of Birds in the Smithsonian Institution, made by Mr. H. E. Holland at Greytown, Nicaragua, with descriptions of new species. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. New York, 1865. Annual Report.] 42 [May 5, Catalogue of Birds observed on New York, Long and Staten Islands, and the adjacent parts of New Jersey. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. New York, 1866. Characters ef seven new species of Birds from Central and South America. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. New York, 1866. Descriptions of six new species of Birds of the Families Hirundinide, For- micaride, Tyrannide and Trochilide. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. New York, 1866. Descriptions of new species of American Birds. By the same. 8yvo. Pamph. New York, 1867. Descriptions ef new species of Trochilidae. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. New York, 1867. Notes on certain Birds from New Granada, with descriptions of new species. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. Philadelphia, 1867. Descriptions of five new species of Central American Birds. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. Philadelphia, 1867. A Catalogue of the Birds found in Costa Rica. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. New York, 1868. From the Author. Dictionary of the Spanish and English Languages. By S.H. Blanc. 24mo. Paris, 1852. Guias Poligliotas. Manuel de la Conversacion Espamiol-Inglés por F. Corona. Bustamante y M. Clifton. 32mo. Paris. From Mrs. Bryant. Catalogue des Livres publiés en Langues ¢étrangéres par |’ Académie Impériale des Sciences de St.-Pétersbourg. 8vo. 1867. Bibliotheca Historico-Naturalis Physico-Chemica et Mathematica. Jahrg. xvi, Heft 2; xv, 1. 8vo. New York, 1867-8. From Messrs. B. Wester- mann g Co. Cosmos: Sketch of a Physical Description of the Universe. By Alexander von Humboldt. Vol. 1v, Pt.1. 8vo. London, 1858. Zodnomia; or, the Laws of Organic Life. By Erasmus Darwin, M.D. Vols. I-Iv. 8vo. London, 1801. From Dr. Robert Amory. The Peabody Institute of the City of Baltimore. The Founder’s Letters and the Papers relating to its Dedication, and its History up to January, 1868. 8vo. Baltimore, 1868. Address of the President, and Reports of the Treasurer and Provost, February 12, 1869. 8vo. rom the Institute. Beschreibungen neuer und wenig bekannter Arten aus der Familie Orbitelae Latr. oder Epeiridae Sund. Von Eugen Keyserling. 8vo. Pamph. Dresden, 1864. ; Monographie der Scydmaeniden Central-und Siidamerika’s. Von-L. W. Schaufuss. 4to. Dresden, 1866. From Mr. J. C. Merrill. Die amerikanischen Ulidina. Von Director H. Loew in Meseritz. §8yo. Pamph. ; . Diptera Americae Septentrionalis indigena. Descripsit H. Loew. pp. 115- 166. 8vo. 1869.] 43 [Annual Report. Ueber eine Reproduction der Siemens’schen Widerstands-Einheit. Von Franz Dehms. 4to. Pamph. Berlin, 1868. From Dr. H. Loew. Report of the State Geologist (New Jersey), Prof. Geo. H. Cook, for the years 1864, 1867. 8vo. Trenton. Geological Map of New Jersey, 1868. Report of the Board of Visitors, New Jersey State College for the benefit of Agriculture, 2d and 4th, 8vo. Trenton, 1866, 1868. From Prof. Geo. H. Cook- Description of new species of Cyprea. By S.R. Roberts. 8vo. Pamph. Philadelphia, 1868. Descriptions of Miocene Shells of the Atlantic Slope. By T. A. Conrad. 8vo. Pamph. Remarks on some of the Mollusca of the valley of the Mohawk. By Jas. Lewis, M.D. 8vo. Pamph. From Mr. S. R. Roberis. On Symmetry and Distorted Symmetry in the Leaves of Plants. By Burt G. Wilder, M.D. 8vo. Pamph. Boston, 1867. Extra Digits. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. Boston, 1868. Cornell University. Circular to School Commissioners, City Superintendents and Superiors. 8vo. Pamph. Albany, 1868. Supplement. Catalogue of the Officers and Students of the Cornell University for the year 1868-9. 8yvo. Pamph. Ithaca, N. Y., 1869. From Prof. B. G. Wilder. Invertebrata of Massachusetts. Dr. Gould’s Manuscript Catalogue, revised by W. G. Binney. 8vo. Pamph. Burlington, 1868. Land and Fresh Water Shells of North America. By W.G. Binney. Parts i-11. 8vo. Washington, 1865. Bibliography of American Conchology previous to the year 1860. Parts 1-11. By W. G. Binney. 8vo. Washington, 1863-4. Researches upon the Hydrobiinz and allied forms. By Dr. William Stimp- son. 8vo. Pamph. Washington, 1865. From Mr. W. G. Binney. Report of the Commissioners of Fisheries, for the year ending January 1, 1868. 8vo. Pamph. Boston, 1868. Fifteenth Annual Report of the Secretary of the Massachusetts Board of Agriculture. 8vo. Boston, 1868. Report of the Librarian of the State Library for the year ending Sept. 30, 1868. 8vo. Pamph. Boston, 1869. Plates to Hitchcock’s Ichnology of Massachusetts. Report of the Commissioners of Fisheries for the year ending January 1, 1869. 8vo. Pamph. Boston, 1869. From Mr. F. G. Sanborn. Message from the President of the United States, communicating the fourth Meteorological Report of Prof. James P. Espy. 4to. Washington, 1857. Reports of the Superintendent of the Coast Survey, showing the Progress of the Survey during the years 1855 and 1861. 4to. Washington. Annual Report.) 44 [May 5, A Statistical View of the District of Maine. By Moses Greenleaf. 8vo. Boston, 1816. ; A Survey of the State of Maine, in reference to its Geographical Features, Statistics and Political Economy. By Moses Greenleaf. 8yvo. Portland, 1829. Second Annual Report of the Geology of the Public Lands of Maine and Massachusetts. By C. T. Jackson. 8vo. Augusta, 1838. Third Annual Report on the Geology of the State of Maine. By Charles T. Jackson, M.D. 8vo. Augusta, 1839. From Mr. C. A. Stearns. Annual Report of the Commissioner of Patents for the year 1866. Vols. 1- m1. 8vo. Washington, 1867. Expulsion of the President. Speech of Hon. Charles Sumner of Massachu- setts. 8vo. Pamph. Washington, 1868. Validity and Necessity of Fundamental Conditions on States. Speech of Hon. Charles Sumner, in the Senate of the United States, June 10, 1868. 8yo. Pamph. Reports on the Mineral Resources of the United States. 8vo. Washington, 1868. Issues at the Presidential Elections. Speech of Hon. Charles Sumner at the City Hall, Cambridge, Oct. 30, 1868. 8vo. Pamph. Boston, 1868. Annual Report of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution for 1867. 8vo. Washington, 1868. Report on the Exploration of the Yellowstone River, by Brevet Brig.-Gen. W.F. Raynolds. 8vo. Washington, 1868. From Hon. Charles Sumner. Wahrnehmungen bei einer Bereisung des Kupfer- und Blei- Gebietes im nordwestlichen Theile der Vereinigten Staaten Nord-Amerika’s, von Dr. Charles M. Wetherill. 8vo. Pamph. Wien, 1856. Report of Experiments upon the Ventilation of the Capitol Extension. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. Washington, 1865. Experiments with the Ammonium Amaigam. By the same. 8yo. Pamph. New Haven, 1865. Report on the Chemical Analysis of the White Sulphur Water of the Artesian Well of Lafayette, Ind. By thesame. 8vo. Pamph. Lafayette, 1859. On the Crystallization of Sulphur, etc. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. New Haven, 1865. A brief Sketch of the modern Theory of Chemical Types. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. Experiments on Itacolumite (Articulite). By the same. 8vyo. Pamph. New Haven, 1867. Ozone and Antozone. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. On the Crystalline Nature of Glass. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. New Haven, 1866. Register of the Officers and Students of the Lehigh University, South Beth- lehem, Penn. 8vo. Pamph. 1868. From Prof. Charles M. Wetherill. Catalogue of the Orthoptera of North America described previous to 1867. 1869.] 45 [Annual Report. Prepared for the Smithsonian Institution by Samuel H. Scudder. 8vo. Pamph. Washington, 1868. Notes on the Stridulation of some New England Orthoptera. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. Boston, 1868. Check-List of the Butterflies of New England. By the same. 32mo. Pamph. Boston, 1868. Entomological Notes,I. Bythesame. 8vo. Pamph. Boston, 1868. Supplement to a List of the Butterflies of New England. By the same. 8vo. Pamph. Boston, 1868. Revision of the Large, Stylated, Fossorial Crickets. By the same. 8vo. Salem, 1869. The Indian Races of North and South America. By Charles De Wolf Brownell. 8vo. Hartford, 1861. The American Naturalist. Vol. 1, Nos. 5-10. 8vo. Salem, 1867. Ueber Agrilus viridis Kiesew., ein die Erlen verwiistendes Insect. Von Vin- - cenz Kollar. 8vo. Pamph. 1858. Portrait of Dr. T. W. Harris. Lexikon der Entomologischen Welt, der Carcinologischen und Arachnologis- chen. Bearbeitet unter Mitwirkung von achtundfinfzig Gelehrten und Natur- forschern durch Johannes Gistel. 8vo. Stuttgart, 1846. School of Mines, Columbia College, Catalogue, etc., 1868-9. 8vo. Pamph. New York. On the Phalangez of the United States of America. By Horatio C. Wood, Jr.,M.D. 8vo. Pamph. Salem, 1868. From Mr. S. H. Scudder. Hallucinations. By A. Brierre de Boismont. 8vo. Philadelphia, 1853. A Treatise of the Materia Medica. By William Cullen, M.D. 8vo. Phila- delphia, 1808. Discourses on the Nature and Cure of Wounds. By John Bell. 8vo. Wal- pole, N. H., 1807. First Lines of the Theory ahd Practice of Philosophical Chemistry. By John Berkenhout, M.D. 8vo. London, 1788. A: New Theory of Physick and Diseases. By Nicholas Robinson, M.D. 8vo. London, 1725. A System of Surgery. By Benjamin Bell. Vols.1-1v. 8vo. Troy, N. Y., 1804. The Principles of Surgery. By John Bell. 8&vo. New York, 1810. Text Book of a Course of Lectures on the Theory and Practice of Physic. Part second. By James Jackson, M.D. 8vo. Boston, 1827. The Diseases of the Urethra. By Charles Bell. 8vo. Boston, 1811. The Edinburgh New Dispensatory. By Andrew Duncan, Jun., M.D. §&vo. Edinburgh, 1803. , The American New Dispensatory. By James Thacher, M.D. 8vo. Boston. An Essay on the Organic Diseases and Lesions of the Heart and Great Ves- sels. By J. N. Corvisart. 8vo. Boston, 1812. An Introduction to the Practice of Midwifery. By Thomas Denman, M. D. Vols. 1-1. 8vo. New York, 1802. Annual Report.] 46 [May 6, Hydropathy. By Joel Shew, M.D. 8vo. New York, 1844. Hydropathy. By Edward Johnson, M. D. 8vo. London, 1846. Treatise on Strabismus. By John H. Dix, M.D. 8vo. Boston, 1841. A Treatise on Hemorrhage. By J. F. D. Jones, M. D. 8vo. London, 1805. Medical and Surgical Memoirs. By Nathan Smith, M.D. 8vo. Baltimere, 1831. On the Treatment of Curvature of the Spine and Club Feet. By John B. Brown, M.D. 8vo. Pamph. Boston, 1839. Dissertation on Croup. By J. H. Wright. 8vo. Pamph. Northampton, 1838. Engravings, representing the Generation of some Animals. By Thomas Denman, M.D. 4to. London, 1815. Anatomy of the Heart, Cranium and Brain. By Alexander Ramsay, M. D. 4to. Edinburgh, 1813. Elements of Chemistry. By Robert Kerr. 8vo. New York, 1806. A Practical Treatise on the Diseases of the Eye. By William Mackenzie. 8vo. Boston, 1883. Surgical Essays. By Astley Cooper and Benjamin Travers. 8vo. Philadel- phia, 1821. A Popular Treatise on Deafness. By Dr. Lighthill. 8vo. New York, 1862. Three Dissertations on Boylston Prize Questions for the years 1806 and 1807. By George Cheyne Shattuck, M.D. 8yvo. Boston, 1808. Boylston Prize Dissertations for the years 1836 and 1837. By O. W. Holmes, M.D. 8vo. Boston, 1838. Boylston Prize Dissertations. By Usher Parsons, M.D. 8vo. Boston, 1839. An Essay on the Bowel Complaints of Children. By John Cheyne, M. D. 8vo. Philadelphia, 1813. Facts and Observations on Puerperal Fever. By John Armstrong, M. D. 8vo. London, 1814. Library of Practical Medicine. Vols. I-11, IV, viI-vi. 8vo. Boston, 1831-8. The Anatomy of the Bones, Muscles and Joints. By John Bell. Vols. 1-111. 8vo. Edinburgh, 1802. Elements of Chemistry. By A. F. Fourcroy. Vols. 1-m1. 8vo. Edinburgh, 1800. Observations on Typhoid Fever. By Enoch Hale, M.D. 8vo. Boston, 1839. A Treatise on the Venereal Diseases. By John Hunter. 8vo. Philadelphia, 1791. Elements of Chemistry. By J. A. Chaptal. 8vo. Boston, 1806. Anatomicae Disquisitiones de Auditu et Olfactu. Auctore Antonio Scarpa. Folio. Meriolani, 1795. Sull’ Ernie. Di Antonio Scarpa. Folio. Milano, 1809. Sul?’ Aneurisma. Di Antonio Scarpa. Folio. Pavia, 1804. A Sett of Anatomical Tables. By William Smellie, M. D. Folio. London, 1754. Crustacea from the West Coast of North America. By J. W. Randall. 8vo. Pamph. 1839. 1859.] AT [Annual Report. Flora from the Apalachian Coal-Field. By JamesP.Kimball. 8vo. Pamph. Gottingen, 1857. Description of a Species of Caligus. By Chas. Pickering, M. D. 8vo. Pamph. New Haven, 1838. Universal Geography. By M. Malte-Brun. Vols. I-Iv, VI-vIlI. §8vo. Boston, 1824-31. Baley’s Dictionary. 8vo. | Boyer’s French Dictionary. 8vo. Boston, 1839. History of England. By Lord Mahon. Edited by Henry Reed. Vols. 1-11. 8vo. New York, 1849. Trigonometry. By Thomas Simpson. 8vo. Philadelphia, 1810. Statistical View of the United States, being a Compendium of the Seventh Census. By J.D. B. DeBow. 8vo. Washington, 1884. First Report to the Cotton Planters’ Convention of Georgia. By Joseph Jones. 8vo. Augusta, 1860. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. Vol. 1, Sign. 1-2, 4-33; 11, 1-6, 8. Lists of Members, 1812-41. 8vo. From Dr. J. W. Randall. Sveriges Geologiska Undersodkning, Stockholm. XxiI-xxy. §8vo. 1867. (With maps.) Exposé des Formations quaternaires de la Suéde, par A. Erdmann. Text 8vo. Atlas 4to. Stockholm, 1868. Regia Societas Scientiarum Upsaliensis. Nova Acta. Vol. u~v; Seriei Tertiz. Vol. vi, Fasc. 2. 4to. 1775-99, 1868. Arsskrift. Arg. 1-11. 8vo. 1860-61. Videnskabs-Selskab i Christiania. orhandlinger. Aar, 1867. Register, 1858-67. 8vo. Kongelige Norske Frederiks Universitets, Christiania. Aarsberetning for Aaret 1867. 8vo. Index Scholarum, Feb. et Aug., 1868. 4to. Mémoires pour servir & Ja connaissance des Crinoides Vivants, par Michael Sars. 4to. Pamph. Christiania, 1868. - Physiographiske Forening, Christiania. Nyt Magazin for Naturvidenskaberne. Bind. 1, Heft. 2; m-xv. 8vo. 1837-68. Universitat zu Kiel. Schriften, 1867. 4to. 1868. Société Royale des Antiquaires du Nord, Copenhague. Mémoires, 1850-1860. Nouvelle Série, 1866. 8vo. Tilleg til Aarboger for Nordisk Oldkyndighed og Historie. Aargang 1866. 8vo. Pamph. Kjébenhavn, 1867. Clavis Poética Antique Linguz Septentrionalis. 8vo. Hafniae, 1864. Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab, Kjébenhavn. Skrifter. Femte Rekke. Naturv. og Math. Afdeling. Bind. vi-vm. 4to. 1867-8. Oversigt over Forhandlinger. 1865, Nr. 5; 1866, Nr. 7; 1867, Nr. 4-6; 1868, 1-2. 8vo. Om Integrationen af Differentialligninger, etc., af Adolph Steen. 4to. Pamph. Kjobenhavn, 1868. Annual Keport.] 48 {May 8, Gelehrte estnische Gesellschaft zu Dorpat. Sitzungsberichte, 1866-7. 8vo. Schriften, No. 5-6. 8vo. Die aeltesten Gerichts-Ordnungen Russlands. Von Dr. jur. E. S. Tobien. 1. 4to. Pamph. 1846. Societas Scientiarum Fennice, Helsingfors. Notiser ur Sallskapets pro Fauna et Flora Fennice Forhandlingar. Haft. 1-vi1,1x. 4to and 8vo. 1848-68. Genmile med anledning af Sallskapets pro Fauna et Flora Fennica Notiser Haft. v och vi af Th. M. Fries. 8vo. Pamph. Upsala, 1862. Herbarium Musei Fennici. 8vo. Pamph. Helsingfors, 1859. Société Impériale des Naturalistes de Moscou. Bulletin. Années 1865, Nos. I-IV; 1867, 11-1v; 1868, 1. 8vo. Société Impériale d’ Agriculture de Moscou. Journal. 1865, Nos. 1-4; 1866, 1-8, 5-18; 1867, 4-11. 8vo. (In Russian.) Recueil d’ Articles sur l’Agriculture. 1867, Nos. 1-2. 8vo. Moscou. (In Russian.) Conférences Agronomiques. Années 1864; 1865; 1866, Nos. 1-3. 8vo. Mos- cou. (In Russian ) Brown Hay. 8vo. Pamph. Moscow, 1867. (In Russian.) Naturforschender Verein, Riga. Correspondenzblatt. Jahrg. 1-xm1, xvtI. 8vo. 1846-67. Arbeiten. Band 1. 8vo. Rudolstadt. Neue Folge, Heft. 2. 8vo. Riga. 1868. Académie Impériale des Sciences de St.-Pétersbourg. Mémoires. 7° Serie. Tomes x1, Nos. 9-18; x11, 1-3. 4to. 1867-8. Bulletin. Tomes xm, Nos. 2-5; xi, 1-3. 4to. 1868. Imperial Russian Geographical Society, St. Petersburg. Proceedings, Vol. i, Nos. 4-8; Iv, 1-3. 8vo. 1867-8. Report for 1867. 8vo. (In Russian.) Naturforschende Gesellschaft, Altenburg. Mittheilungen aus dem Osterlande, Band xvitt, Heft. 3-4. 8vo. 1868. Deutsche geologische Gesellschaft, Berlin. Zeitschrift. Band xx, Heft. 1-3. 8vo. 1868. Archiv fir Naturgeschichte, Berlin. Jahrg. xxxu, Heft. 6; xxx, 5; XXXIV, 1-4. 8vo. 1866-8. Entomologischer Verein in Berlin. Berliner Entomologische Zeitschrift. Jahrg. xu, Heft. 1-2. Svo. 1868. Konigliche Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin. Abhand- lungen, 1866-1867. 4to. Monatsberichte Dec., 1867,—Jan., 1869. 8vo. Gesellschaft naturforschender Freunde zu Berlin. Sitzungs-Berichte. Jahr. 1867-8. 4to. 1868-9. Verein zur Beforderung des Gartenbaues, Berlin. Wochenschrift, 1867, Nos. 27-52; 1868. to. Naturhistoricher Verein der preussischen Rheinlandes und Westphalens, Bonn. Verhandlungen. Jahrg. vu, Heft. 3; xxiv. 8vo. 1851, 1867. Das finf und zwanzigjahrige Stiftungsfest. 4to. Pamph. 1867. Naturwissenschaftlicher Verein zu Bremen. Abhandlungen. Band 1, Heft. 3. S8vo. 1868. Verein fiir schlesische Insektenkunde zu Breslau. Zeitschrift fir Entomol- ogie. Jahrg. I-vi, viI-x. 8vo. 1847-57. 1869. ] 49 {Annual Report. Schlesische Gesellschaft fir vaterlandische Cultur, Breslau. Abhandlungen. Philos. Abth., 1867; 1868, Heft. 1. Abth. fiir Naturw., 1862, 1-3; 1863, 1-3; 1864; 1867-8. 8vo. Jahres-Berichte XXXIX-XLIII, XLV. 8vo. 1862-1667. Verzeichniss der in den Schriften, etc., von 1804 bis 1863 incl. 8vo. Naturwissenschaftliche Gesellschaft zu Chemnitz. Berichte 1-11. 8vo. 1865-8. Naturforschende Gesellschaft in Danzig. Schriften. Neue Folge. Band n, 1. 8vo. 1868. Separat-Abzug aus der Hedwigia. Nr. 12. 8vo. Pamph. Danzig, 1867. Mittelrheinischer geologischer Verein, Darmstadt. Notizblatt. m1 Folge, Heft 6. 8vo. 1867. Naturhistorischer Verein fiir Anhalt in Dessau. Verhandlungen. Bericht XXVII. 8vo. 1869. Kaiserliche Leopoldino-Carolinische deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher, Dresden. Verhandlungen. Band xxxiv. 4to. 1668. Naturwissenschaftliche Gesellschaft Isis in Dresden. Sitzungs-Berichte 1868. 8vo. Jahrbiicher fir Volks- und Landwirthschaft. Band 1x, Heft. 1-2. 8vo. Dresden, 1868. Naturforschende Gesellschaft, Emden. Jahresbericht Lv, 1867. 8vo. 1868. Zoologische Gesellschaft, Frankfurt a. M. Der Zoologische Garten. Jahrg. Ix. 8vo. 1868. Deutsche Malakozoologische Gesellschaft, Frankfurt a. M. Nachrichtsblait, No. 1-2. 8vo. 1868. Naturforschende Gesellschaft zu Freiburg i. Br. Bericht tiber die Verhand- lungen. Band. 1-11; 1v, Heft.4; v,1. 8vo. 1855-62, 1867-8. Oberhessischen Gesellschaft fir Natur- und Heiikunde, Giessen. Berichte I-ll. 8vo. 1847-53. Naturforschende Gesellschaft zu Gorlitz. Abhandlungen. Band. 1v—v, xu. Svo. 1844-50, 1868. Oberlausitzische Gesellschaft, Gorlitz. Neues Lausitzisches Magazin. Bind. XLIV, Heft. 2-3; xLtv,1. 8vo. 1868. K. Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften, Gottingen. Nachrichten. 1868. 12mo. Gottingische gelehrte Anzeigen. Band. 1-11. 12mo. 1868. Verein der Aerzte in Steiermark, Gratz. Sitzungsberichte. Vereinsjahr v, Nr. 1-5. 8vo. 1867-8. Naturwissenschaftlicher Verein in Halle. Zeitschrift fur die gesammten Naturwissenschaften. Band. xx1x-xxx1. 8vo. Berlin, 1867-8. Wetterauische Gesellschaft fiir die gesammte Naturkunde zu Hanau. Bericht Oct. 14, 1868—Dec. 31, 1867. S8vo. 1868. Naturhistoriche Gesellschaft zu Hannover. Jahresberichte 1-11, V—vIt, 1x, Xv— vu. 8vo. and 4to. 1850-67. Verzeichniss der Bichersammlung. 8vo. Pamph. 1861. Das Staatsbudget und das Bediirfniss fiir Kunst und Wissenschaft im Konig- _ reich Hannover. 4to. Pamph. 1866. Nachtrag zu dem ferzeichnisse der in den grafschaften Hoja u. Dipholz gefaspflanzen, etc. Svo. Pamph. Hannofer. Ferzeichnis der im Sollinge gefispflanzen, etc. 8vo. Pamph. Hannofer. PROCEEDINGS B. S. N. H.—VOL. XIII. 4 SEPTEMBER, 1869. Annual Report.} 50 [May 5, Naturhistorisch-medicininischer Verein zu Heidelberg. Verhandlungen. Band tv, Heft.6. 8vo. 1868. Verein fiir siebenbiirgische Landeskunde, Hermannstadt. Archiv. Neue Folge. Band. vii, Heft. 3; vim, 1. 8vo. 1867. Jahresbericht, 1866-7. 8vo. Programm des evangelischen Gymnasiums in Schissburg und der damit verbundenen Lehranstalten, 1866-7. 8vo. Hermannstadt, 1867. Programm des Gymnasiums A. C. zu Hermannstadt fiir das Schuljahr 1865—- 6. 4to. 1866. Siebenbiirgischer Verein fiir Naturwissenschaften zu Hermannstadt. Ver- handlungen und Mittheilungen. Jahrg.xvu. 8vo. Medicinisch-naturwissenschaftlicher Verein, Jena. Jenaische Zeitschrift fiir Medicin und Naturwissenschaft. Bandity. 8vo. 1868. Zeitschrift fiir wissenschaftliche Zoologie, Leipzig. Band. xv; xvu, Heft. 2-4. 8vo. 1865-8. Museum Francisco-Carolinum, Linz. Bericht xxym. 8vo. 1868. Mannheimer Verein fiir Naturkunde, Mannheim. Jahresbericht xxx1v. 8vo. 1868. Konigliche Realschule zu Meseritz. Programme 1850-51, 1863-67. Ato. Commentatio de Monstrorum duplicum Origine, ete. 4to. Pamph. Halis, 1848. Ueber die Dehnung und das Zerreiszen prismatischer Korper, ete. Von Herrn Brix. 4to. Pamph. Berlin, 1845. Belehrungen iiber den Kalender. Vortrag von W. Brennecke, gehalten im naturwissenschaftlichen Verein zu Posen am 16. Januar, 1867. 8vo. Pamph. Posen, 1867. Verein der Freunde der Naturgeschichte in Meklenburg, Neubrandenburg. Archiv. xxiJahr. 8vo. 1868. Pollichia: ein naturwissenschaftlicher Verein der Rheinpfalz, Neustadt a. H. Jahresberichte WI-IvV, XI-XIV, XXV-XXVII. 8yo. 1845-68. Statuten. 8vo. Pamph. 1862. Naturhistorische Gesellschaft, Niirnberg. Abhandlungen. Bandtv. 8vo. Offenbacher Verein fur Naturkunde. Offenbacham Main. Berichte yi-rx. 8vo. 1867-8. K. Bohmische Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften in Prag. Abhandlungen. v1 Folge. Bandr. 4to. 1868. Sitzungsberichte. Jahrg. 1867. 8vo. 1867-8. Lotos. Zeitschrift fiir Naturwissenschaften, Prag. Jakrg. xy-xxi. §&vo. 1865-7. Zoologisch-mineralogischer Verein, Regensburg. Correspondenz-Blatt. Jahrg. XXII 8vo. 1868. K. bayerisch-botanische Gesellschaft, Regensburg. Flora. Neue Reihe. Jahrg. XXvI. 8vo. 1868. Meklenburgischer patriotischer Verein, Rostock. Landwirthschaftliche An- nalen. 1866, Nr. 6; 1868, 1-30. 4to. St. Gallische naturwissenschaftliche Gesellschaft, St. Gallen. Bericht uber die Thatigkeit wAhrend des Vereinsjahres 1866-7. 8vo. 1867. No. Landes- Ober- Realschule in St. Polten. Programm 4. 8vo. 1867. 1869. 51 [Annual Report. Entomologischer Verein, Stettin. Entomologische Zeitung. Jahrg. xxrx. 8vo. 1868. Neues Jahrbuch fiir Mineralogie, Geologie und Palzontologie, Stuttgart. Jahrg. 1868, Heft. 1-7; 1869, 1. 8vo. Verein fiir vaterlandische Naturkunde in Wiirttemberg, Stuttgart. Wiirttem- bergische naturwissenschaftliche Jahreshefte. . Jahrg. xxu1, Heft. 2-3; xx1v, 1-2; xxv,1. 8vo. 1867-9. Kaiserliche Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien. Denkschriften. Math.- naturw. Classe. Band. xxvlI-xxviul. 4to. 1867-8. Sitzungsberichte. Math.- naturw. Classe. 1% Abth., Band. Lyi, Heft. 2-5; Lyi, 1-3. 2te Abth. Lv1, 3-5; Lv, 1-3. 8vo. Wien, 1867-8. K. K. geologische Reichsanstalt, Wien. Jahrbuch. Band xvi. 8vo. 1868. Verhandlungen. 1868, Nrs. 1-11, 14-17. 8vo. Kais.-Konigl. zoologisch-botanische Gesellschaft in Wien. Verhandlungen. Band. Xm, XVII-Xvil. 8vo. 1862, 1867-8. Beitrag zu einer Monographie der Sciarinen von Johann Winnertz. 8vo. Pamph. Wien, 1867. Diagnosen der in Ungarn und Slavonien bisher beobachteten Gefasspflanzen, etc. Von Dr. August Neilreich. 8vo. Pamph. Wien, 1867. Die Diatomeen der hohen Tatra. Von J. Schumann. 8vo. Pamph. Wien, 1867. Kais. Konigl. geographische Gesellschaft in Wien. Mittheilungen. Neue Folge, 1868. 8vo. K. K. Central-Anstalt fiir Meteorologie und Erdmagnetismus, Wien. Neue Folge. Band 111, 1866. 4to. 1868. Nassauischers Verein fiir Naturkunde, Wiesbaden. Jahrbiicher. Heft. 19- 20. 8vo. 1864~6. Physicalisch-medicinische Gesellschaft in Wiirzburg. Verhandlungen. Neue Folge. Band1, Heft. 1. 1868. Wiirzburger naturwissenschaftliche Zeitschrift. Band vi, Heft. 4. 1866-7. 8vo. Schweizerische naturforschende Gesellschaft. Verhandlungen, Rheinfelden, am 9,10 und 11 September 1867. 51 Versammlung. 8vo. Aarau. Naturforschende Gesellschaft, Basel. Verhandlungen. Theil v, Heft. 1. 8vo. 1868. Naturforschende Gesellschaft, Bern. Mittheilungen, 1867. 8vo. 1868. Naturforschende Gesellschaft Graubiindens, Chur. Jahresberichte. Neue Folge. Jahrg. x1. 8vo. 1868. Société de Physique et d’Histoire Naturelle de Genéve. Mémoires. Tome xIx, Pt. 1. 4to. 1868. Société Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles, Lausanne. Bulletin, Nos. 57-59. 8vo. 1867-8. ; Académie Royale des Sciences, des Lettres et des Beaux-Arts de Belgique, Bruxelles. Mémoires Couronnés et Mémoires des Savants Etrangers. T. xxx. 4to. 1867. Mémoires Couronnés et autres Mémoires. T. XIx-xx. 8vo. 1867-8. Bulletins. 2° Série. T. xxiv. 8vo. 1867. Annuaire. 34™° Année. 12mo. 1868. Annual Leport.] 52 [A\fay 5, Société Royale des Sciences de Liége. Mémoires. 2°Sér. T. 1. 8yvo. 1867. Société des Sciences, des Arts et des Lettres du Hainaut, Mons. Mémoires et Publications. 3° Série. T.11. 8vo. 1868. Nederlandsche Entomologische Vereeniging, ’s Gravenhage. Tijdschrift voor Entomologie. Tweede Serie. Deel. m1, Afl. 2-9; 11,1. 8vo. 1867. Essai d’une Faune Entomologique de J’Archipel Indo-Néerlandais, par S. C. Snellen van Vollenhoven. Troisi¢me Monographie, 17¢ Partie. 4to. La Haye, 1868. Koninklijke Akademie van Wetenschappen, Amsterdam. Verhandelingen. Deel x1. 4to. 1868. Verslagen en Mededeelingen. Tweede Reeks. Deel 11. 8vo. 1868. Jaarboek, voor 1867. 8vo. Processen-Verbaal. Afd. Natuurk., 1867-8. 8vo. Programme, 1867. 4to. Flora Batava, door Jan. Kops en J. F. A. Hartsen. Aflev. 200-203. 4to. Amsterdam. Hollandsche Maatschappij der Wetenschappen te Haarlem. Natuurkundige Verhandelingen. 2° Verz. Deel. xxv. 4to. 1868. Archives Néerlandaises. Tome 111, Livr. 1-2. 8vo. 1868. i Provinciaal Genootschap van Kunsten en Wetenschappen in Noordbrabant, ’s Hertogenbosch. Handelingen. Deel 1, St. 3 (1844). Jaar. 1852. 4to. Jaar. 1865-7. 8vo. Catalogus der Bibliotheek, 1852; Suppl., 1866. 8vo. Vlugtig Overzigt der Verzamelingen, door Dr. C. R. Hermans. 8yvo. 1855. Handelingen van het zesde Nederlandsch Taal-en Letterkundig Congres, gehouden September 1860. 8yvo. ’s Hertogenbosch, 1860. Catalogus der Noord- en Zuid- Nederlandsche Munten, etc. 8vo. ’s Hertogen- bosch, 1860. Beredeneerd Overzigt der Landbouwkundige Schriften, door Dr. C. R. Her- mans. 8vo. Pamph. ’s Hertogenbosch, 1845. Noordbrabants Oudheden door Dr. C. R. Hermans. 8vo. Pamph. ’s Herto- genbosch, 1865. Geschiedenis der Rederijkers in Noordbrabant. Door Dr. C. R. Hermans. 2° Stuk. 8vo. ’s Hertogenbosch, 1867. Analytische Opgave van Noord-Brabandsche Charters. Door C. R. Hermans. 8vo. ’s Hertogenbosch, 1844. Verhandeling over de Rupsen-Soorten en derzelver Verdelging, door D. Buijzen. 8vo. Pamph. ’s Hertogenbosch, 1845. De Levensgeschiedenis van Maarten van Rossem. Door Mr. J. D. W. Pape. 8vo. Pamph. ’s Hertogenbosch, 1847. Beantwoording der Vraag. Door J. F. Boorgaard. 8vo. Pamph. ’s Herto- genbosch, 1860. Academia Lugduno-Batavee. Annales 1837-61, 1863-4. 4to. Bataafsch Genootschap der Proefondervindelijke Wijsbegeerte te Rotterdam. Nieuwe Verhandelingen. Deel xu, St. 1. 2° Reeks. Deel 1, St. 1-3. 4to. 1851, 1867. Provinciaal Utrechtsch Genootschap van Kunsten en Wetenschappen, Utrecht. Natuurkundige Verhandelingen. Nieuwe Reeks. Deel 1, St.5. 4to. 1868. Aanteekeningen, 1867. 8vo. Verslag,1867. 8vo. 1880.] 53 _ [Annual Report. Société d@’Emulation du Doubs, Besancon. Mémoires. 4° Série. Vol. un. 8vo. 1868. Société des Sciences Physiques et Naturelles de Bordeaux. Mémoires, T. v, Cahier 3; v1,2. 8vo. 1867-8. Extraits des Procés-Verbaux. 8vo. 1867. Société Linnéenne de Bordeaux. Actes. Tomes xx; xxvI, Livr. 4-6. §8vo. 1855, 1868. Société d’Agriculture, Sciences et Arts de la Sarthe, Le Mans. Bulletin. 1868, Tr. 1-4. 8vo. Annales de la Société d’Agriculture, Sciences, Arts et Commerce du Puy. Tome xxvit. 8vo. Le Puy, 1867. Société Impériale des Sciences, de l’Agriculture et des Arts de Lille. fémoires. Années 1850-1852, 1853 et Suppl. 2°Sér. Vols. 1x, x et Suppl. 3° Sér. Vols. 1-v. 8vo. 1850-67. Académie Impériale des Sciences, Belles-Lettres et Arts de Lyon. Mémoires. Classe des Sciences, T. xvi. Classe des Lettres, T. x11. 8vo. 1866-8. Société Linnéenne de Lyon. Annales. N. 8. T. xv, Année 1867. 8vo. Paris, 1868. Société Géologique de France, Paris. Mémoires. 2° Série. Tome viru, Nos. 1-3. 4to. 1865-8. Bulletin. Tomes vit, xui-xiv. 2° Sér. T. vin, fe. 1-9;. x, 12-16; x1x, 21-32, 59 au fin; xx, 1-8; xxv, Nos. 1-4. vo. 1836-68. Société de Géographie, Paris. Bulletin. Fév. 1868,—Jan., 1869. 8vo. Société Entomologique de France, Paris. Annales. 4° Série. Tome vit. 8vo. 1867. Société d’ Anthropologie, Paris. Mémoires, Tome 1, fasc. 1. 8vo. 1868. Bulletin. 2° Série, Tome 11, fasc. 2-5. 8vo. 1867. Société Impériale et Centrale d’ Agriculture, Paris. Mémoires, Années 1848- 62, 1864-5. Bulletin des Séances. 2° Sér. T. x11i-xx; 3° Sér. T. 1-01. 8vo. 1856-67. Biographies des Membres, 1848 41853. 8vo. Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris. Nouvelles Archives. Tomes I-111; Iv, fasc. 1-2. 4to. 1865-8. Société Impériale Zoologique d’Acclimatation, Paris. Bulletin Mensuel. 2° Sér. Tomes v, Nos. 38-12; vi, 1-2. 8vo. 1868-9. La Matiére Médicale a l’Exposition de 1867 par J. Léon Souberain et Augus- tin Delondre. 8vo. Pamph. Paris, 1£68. Société des Antiquaires de France, Paris. Mémoires. Tomes xx-xXvI, XXVIII-Xxx. 8vo. 1850-68. Revue et Magazin de Zoologie, Paris. 1869, No.1. 8vo. Journal de Conchyliologie, Paris. 38° Série. T. vir1, Nos. 2-4; 1x, 1. 8vo. 1868-9. Diagnoses MolJuscorum novorum Guatemale et Reipublicae Mexicanze. Auct. H. Crosse et P. Fischer. 8vo. Pamph. Paris, 1868. Annales des Mines, Paris. 6* Série, 1867, Livr. 4-6; 1868, 1-5. 8vo. Société Impériale et Centrale d’Horticulture de France, Paris. Exposition générale des Produits de Il’Horticulture du 1*7 au 8 Mai, 1868. 8vo. Pamph. Journal. 2° Série. T. 11, Nos. 2-12; 11,1. 8vo. 1868-9. Les Ecoles d’Enseignement Primaire et Professionnel de la Marine. 8vo. Pamph. Paris, 1867. Annual Report.) . 54 [May 5, Les Combustibles pour les Chaudiéres 4 Vapeur. Par D. Morel. §8vo. Pamph. Paris, 1868. Produits tirés des Eaux et des Rivages dans les Colonies Frang¢aises par M. Aubry Le Comte. 8vo. Pamph. Paris, 1865. Etude sur l’Industrie Huitriére des Etats-Unis. Par M. Ph. de Broca. §8vo. Pamph. Paris, 1863. Rapport sur l’Exposition Internationale de Péche des Pays-Bas. 8vo. Pamph. Paris, 1861. La Péche Cotiére dans la Méditerranée par M. J. B. A. Rimbaud. 8vo. Pamph. Paris, 1864. Notice sur les Péches du Danemark, des Tes Féroé, etc. Par. M. Irminger. 8vo. Pamph. Paris, 1863. Rapport sur l’Exposition Internationale de Péche de Boulogne-sur-Mer. Par M. Ducrest de Villeneuve. 8vo. Pamph. Paris, 1867. Exposition Internationale de Péche et d’Acquiculture d’Archachon, 1866. 8vo. Pamph. Paris, 1867. Statistiques des Péches Maritimes, 1866-7. 8vo. Paris, 1868. Observations sur les Sels par M. Roux. 8vo. Pamph. Paris, 1868. Culture et Production du Café. Par M. Aubry Le Comte. 8vo. Pamph. Paris, 1865. Culture et Production du Coton. Par M. Aubry Le Comte. 8vo. Pamph. Paris, 1866. Culture et Production du Tabac. Par M. Aubry Le Comte. 8vo. Pamph. Paris, 1865. Legislation et Production du Sucre de Canne. Par M. Aubry Le Comte. 8vo. Pamph. Paris, 1865. Exploitations des Matiéres Textiles. Par M. Aubry Le Comte. 8vo. Pamph. Paris, 1866. Rapport sur la Conservation des Vins, par M. de Lapparent. 8vo. Pamph. ‘Paris, 1868. Notice sur les Eaux Thermales de Hammam-Melouan. Par L. Ville. 8vo. Pamph. Paris, 1864. Etudes sur les Mouvements de l’Air. Par M. Lartigue. 8vo. Pamph. Paris. Recherches Ophthalmiques sur ]’Algérie. Par §. Furnari. 8vo. Pamph. Paris, 1860. Du Climat d’ Alger dans les Affections Chroniques de la Poitrine. Parle Dr. Pr. de Pietra Santa. 8vo. Pamph. Paris, 1860. Le Volcan de la Réunion. Eruption de Novembre 1858. Par M. Hugoulin. 8vo. Pamph. Paris, 1862. Immigration Indienne. Par M. L. A. Gaigneron et J. Plomb. 8vo. Paris, 1862, 1865. Bibliographie Annamite. Par M. V.-A. Barbié du Bocage. 8vo. Pamph. Paris, 1865. Les Oasis du Sahara. Par L.deColomb. 8vo. Pamph. Paris, 1860. Nouvelle-Calédonie et ses Dépendances. 8vo. Pamph. Paris, 1866. Tle de la Réunion. Productions Naturelles, etc. Par. M. G. Imhaus. 8va. Pamph. Paris, 1858. 1869.} 55 {Annual Report. Applications des Industries de la Métropole a l’Ile dela Réunion. Par M. Hugoulin. 8vo. Paris, 1863. Loi sur le Régime Douanier, etc. Svo. Pamph. Paris, 1861. Catalogue des Produits des Colonies Frangaises, etc. 8vo. Pamph. Paris, 1862. Population, etc., Colonies Frangaises, 1865. 8vo. Paris, 1867. Le Commerce et le Navigation de l’Algérie. Par M. F. Elie de la Primandaie. 8vo. Paris, 1861. Du Sénégal au Niger. Par M.E. Mage. 8vo. Paris, 1867. Société d’Agriculture, Sciences, Arts et Belles-Lettres du Département d’Indre-et-Loire, Tours. Annales. T. xivu, Nos. 9-10. 8vo. 1868. Societa Entomologica Italiana, Firenze. Bullettino. Anno1, Fasc. 1. 8vo. 1869. Reale Istituto d’Incoraggiamento alle Scienze naturali, etc., di Napoli. Atti, 2* Ser., T. 1, 1v. 4to. 1865, 1867. Societa Reale di Napoli. Atti dell’ Accademia delle Scienze Fisiche e Math- ematiche. Vol. um. 1865. 4to. Rendiconto. Anno Iv, Fasc. 4-10; v; vi, 1- 5. 1865-7. 4to. Giornale di Scienze Naturali ed Economiche, Palermo. Vol. 111, Fasc. 1-4. 4to. 1867. Libros del Saber de Astronomia del Rey D. Alfonso X de Castilla. Tomo v, Parte 1. Folio. Madrid, 1867. Natural History and Philosophical Society, Belfast. Annual Report of the Belfast Museum. Session 1867-8. 12mo. Naturalists’ Field Club, Belfast. Fifth Annual Report. S8vo. 1868. Saint Patrick: Apostle of Ireland. By R. Steele Nicholson, M. A. 8vo. Dublin, 1868. Royal Dublin Society. Journal. No. xxxvu. 8yo. 1868. Royal Society of Edinburgh. Transactions. Vol. xxv, Pt. 1. 4to. 1868. . Proceedings. Session 1867-8. 8vo. Royal Physical Society of Edinburgh. Proceedings. Sessions 1862-6. 8vo. Botanical Society of Edinburgh. Transactions. Vol. 1x,Pt.2. S8vo. 1868. Philosophical and Literary Society, Leeds. Annual Report, 1867-8. 8vo. Report of the Proceedings of the Geoiogical and Polytechnic Society of the West Riding of Yorkshire, Leeds. 1850, 1860, 1861, 1867, 1868. 8vo. Historic Society of Lancashire and Cheshire, Liverpool. Address to the Members, by Joseph Mayer, President. 8vo. Pamph. 1868. Entomological Society of London. Transactions. 38d Ser. Vols. m1, Pt. 5-6; Iv, 4-5; v, 8. Year 1868, Parts 1-5. 8vo. Royal Geographical Society, London. Proceedings. No. 9; Vols. xu, Nos. 1-5; xin, 1. 8vo. 1868. Journal. Vols. xix, xxxvu. 8vo. 1849, 1867. Linnean Society of London. Proceedings. Vol. vit, Sign. a-g; Session 1866-7. 8vo. 1862, 1867. Transactions, Vol. xxv, Pt. 1. 4to. 1868. Journal, Zoology, Nos. 36-42; Botany, Nos. 40-47; Vol. rx, Title Page. List, 1867. 8vo. Royal Society of London. Philosophical Transactions. Vol. ciyit, Part 2. 4to. 1867. List, 1867. 4to. Pamph. Proceedings. Nos. 45, 95-109. 8vo. 1861, 1868-9. Annual Report. ] 56 [May 5, A Monograph on the Structure and Development of the Shoulder-Girdle and Sternum in the Vertebrata. By W. Kitchen Parker. 4to. London, 1868. Royal Institution of Great Britain, London. Proceedings. Vol. v, Parts 1-4. 8vo. 1867-8. List, 1868. The Anthropological Review, London. Nos. xx1-xxiv. 8vo. 1868. Geological Society of London. Quarterly Journal. Nos. 92-97. 8vo. 1867-8. List, 1867, 1868. 8vo. Zoological Society of London. Proceedings of the Scientific Meetings. 1867, Part 111; 1868, 1-11. 8vo. Index, 1848-60. 8vo. The Geological Magazine, London. Vols. v; v1, 1-3. 8vo. 1868-9. Royal Horticultural Society of London. Journal. New Series. Vol. m1, Part 5. 8vo. 1868. Proceedings. New Series. Vol. 1,Nos.10-12. 8vo. 1868. The Ethnological Journal, London. Nos. 1-111, v-1x. 8yvo. 1865-6. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History; London. Fourth Series. Nos. 8-9, 11-16. 8vo. 1868-9. The Journal of Travel and Natural History, London. Vol. 1, Nos. 1-5. 8vo. 1868. The Entomologist, London. Vols. 111; tv, Nos. 48-60. 8vo. 1866-8. The Zodlogist, London. 2d Ser. Vol. 111. 8vo. 1868. Triibner’s American and Oriental Literary Record, London. Nos. 34-43. 4to. 1868. Scientific Opinion, London. Vol.1, No.1. 4to. 1868. Manchester Scientific Students’ Association. Reports, 1862-7. 8vo. Abstract of an Address on Man’s Earliest Works. By John Plant. 8vo. 1865. Bombay Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, Bombay. Journal. Vol. vu, No. 24. 1865-6. 8vo. Bombay, 1868. The Times of India. Vol. xxx1, No. 30. Folio. Bombay, 1868. Asiatic Society of Bengal, Oalcutta. Journal. 1866, Part 1, Title Page; 1867, Part 1, No. 2; Part 11, No.2. 8vo. Proceedings, 1867, Nos. 8-10. 8vo. Geological Survey of India, Calcutta. Memoirs, Palzontologia Indica, v, 1-4. 4to. 1867. Memoirs. Vol. vi, Parts 1-2. 8vo. Annual Report, Eleventh year, 1866-7. 8vo. Catalogue of the Meteorites in the Museum of the Survey. 8vo. Pamph. 1867. Royal Society of Victoria, Melbourne. Transactions and Proceedings. Vol. vitl, Part 2; 1x, 1. " 8vo. The Canadian Naturalist and Geologist, Montreal. New Series. Vol. m1, Nos. 4-6. 8vo. 1868. Le Naturaliste Canadien, Québec. Tomer, Nos. 1-5. 8vo. 1868~9. The Canadian Journal of Industry, Science and Art, Toronto. New Series. Nos. LXVI-LXvu. 8vo. 1867-8. Entomological Society of Canada, Toronto. The Canadian Entomologist. Vol. 1, Nos. 1-9. 8vo. 1868. Constitution and By-Laws. 8vo. Pamph. Repertorio Fisico-Natural de la Isla de Cuba, Habana. Tom. 1, Nos. 8, 15- end. 8vo. 1868. Real Sociedad Economica, Habana. Memorias y Anales de Fomento. Tom. ix, Entr. 4-6; x, 1-10. 8vo. 1864-5. Universidad de Chile, Santiago. Anales, 1860-66. 8vo. 1869.] es," [Annwal Report. Descubryimiento i Conquista de Chile. Por Miguel Luis Amundategui. 8vo. Santiago, 1862. Historia Jeneral de la Repttblica de Chile desde su Independencia hasta nuestros Dias. 8vo. Santiago, 1866. Chile durante los Afios de 18241828. Por Melchor Conchai Toro. 8vo. Santiago, 1862. Chile bajo el Imperio de la Constitucion de 1828. Por. Frederico Errazuriz. _ 8vo. Santiago, 1861. Bosquejo Historico de la Poesia Chileno, escrito por Adolfo Valderrama. 8vo. Santiago, 1866. : Oratorio Sagrada. Por P. G. dela Fuente. Tomer. 8vo. Santiago, 1866. Examen Comparativo de la Tarifa i Lejislacion Aduanera de Chile con las de Francia, Gran Bretafia i Estados-Unidos. Por J. H. Courcelle Seneuil. 8vo. Pamph. Santiago, 1856. Informe sobre los Depésitos de Guano de Mejillones. Por Don Luis Larroque. 8vo. Santiago, 1863. Memoria que el Ministro de Estado en el Departamento de Hacienda presenta al Congresio Nacional de 1863-1867. 8vo. Santiago. Noticia sobre el Terreno Carbonifera de Coronel i Lota, etc. Por Don Paulino del Barrio. 8vo. Santiago, 1857. Cuenta Jeneral de las Entradas i Gastos Fiscales de la Republica de Chile en 1866. 8vo. Santiago, 1867. Censo Jeneral, Abril 1865. 4to. Santiago, 1866. Anuario Estadfstico de la Reptiblica de Chile. Entrega 2-7. 4to. Santiago, 1861-5. Estadistica Bibliografica de la Literatura Chilena. Por Don Ramon Brisefio. 4to. Santiago, 1862. New York State Agricultural Society, Albany. Transactions, 1867, Pts. 1-11. 8vo. American Academy of Arts and Sciences, Boston. Memoirs. New Series. Vol. rx, Part 1. 4to. Proceedings. Vol. vir, Sign. 24-48. S8vo. 1868. Public Library of the City of Boston; Balene Nos. 4-9. 8vo. 1868. An- nual Report; 16th. 8vo. 1868. Massachusetts Historical Society, Boston. Collections. Fourth Series. Vol. “vit. 8vo. Boston, 1868. The Boston Medical and Surgical Journal. New Series. Vol. 1, Nos. 14-22, 24-26; 11, 1-3, 5-18, 20, 22-26; 111, 1, 83-12. Svo. 1868-9. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston. Fourth Annual Catalogue. 8vo. Pamph. 1868. Massachusetts Horticultural Society, Boston. Transactions for the year 1868. 8vo. 1869. American Association for the Advancement of Science. Seventeenth Meet- ing, at Chicago, August, 1868. Circular of the Local Committee, Chicago, June 8, 1868. Proceedings of the Sixteenth Meeting, held at Burlington, Vt., August, 1867. 8vo. Cambridge, 1868. Museum of Comparative Zodlogy, Cambridge. Builetin, Nos. 6-7. 8vo. 1868. Annual Report of the Trustees, 1867, 1868. 8vo. Annual Report.) 58 (May 5, State Historical Society of Wisconsin, Madison. Report and Collections. Vol. v, Parts 1-3. 8vo. 1868. Naturhistorischer Verein von Wisconsin, Milwaukee. Jahres-Bericht. 8vo. 1869. The American Journal of Science and Arts. Nos. 135-140, 8vo. New Haven, 1868-9. Lyceum of Natural History, New York. Annals. Vol. 1x, Nos. 1-4. 8vo. 1868. The American Agriculturist, New York. Vol. xxvim, Nos. 1-5. 4to. 1869. The American Atheneum, New York. Vol. 1, Nos. 16-18. Fol. 1868. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. Journal. New Series, Vol. vi, Pt. 8. 4to. 1869. Proceedings. 1866, No. 5; 1867, No. 3; 1868, Nos. 1-3. 8vo. The American Journal of Conchology, Philadelphia. Vol.1v. 8vo. 1868. American Entomological Society, Philadelphia. Transactions. Vols. 1, No. 4; 11, Nos.1. 8vo. Philadelphia, 1868. American Philosophical Society, Philadelphia. Proceedings. Vol. x, Nos. 78-80. 8vo. 1868. Portland Society of Natural History. The Portland Catalogue of Maine Plants. 8vo. Pamph. 1868. History and Condition of the Society, from 1866 to 1869. 8vo. 1869. Proceedings. Vol. 1, Pt.2. 8vo. 1869. Reports of the Commissioners of Fisheries for the State of Maine, for 1867 and 1868. 8vo. Augusta, 1869. Academy of Science, St. Louis. Transactions. Vol. 11, Sign. 30-end. 8vo. 1868. The American Entomologist, St. Louis. Vol. 1, Nos. 1-8. 8vo. 1868. The Essex Institute, Salem. Proceedings. Vol. v, Nos. 6-8. 8yvo. 1867-8. Bulletin. Vol. 1, Nos. 1-2. 8vo. 1869. The North American Grapes. By Dr. George Engelmann. 8vo. Pamph. Salem, 1868. Peabody Academy of Science, Salem. Memoirs. Vol.1, No.1. 8vo. 1869. The American Naturalist. Vols. 11, Nos. 4-12; 111, 1-2. 8vo. 1868-9. California Academy of Natural Sciences, San Francisco. Proceedings. Vols. 111, Pt. 5; 1v,1. 8vo. 1868-9. Geological Survey of California, San Francisco. Geology. Vol. 1. 4to. Philadelphia, 1865. The California Farmer, San Francisco. Vols. xx1x, Nos. 14-24; xxx, 1-3, 5-24; xxx1,1,4-10. Folio. 1868-9. Department of Agriculture, Washington. Monthly Report, April, 1868; Feb- ruary, 1869. 8vo. Illustrations of Insects injurious to the Cotton Plant and Orange Tree. 381 plates. By Townend Glover. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C. Annual Report, 1867. 8vo. Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge. Vol. xv. 4to. 1867. New Species of North American Coleoptera. By John L. Leconte, M. D. Parti. 8vo. Washington, 1863. National Academy of Sciences, Washington. Report 1866, 1867. 8vo. 1867-8. 1869.) 59 [Annual Report, Proceedings of the American Antiquarian Society. Nos. 49-51. 8vo. Wore cester, 1868. By Exchange. Botany of the United States Exploring Expedition. Phanerogamia, by Asa Gray, M.D. 4to. New York, 1854. Report of a Geological Reconnoissance of Indiana, made during the years 1859 and 1860, under the direction of the late David Dale Owen, M. D., by Richard Owen, M.D. 8vo. Indianapolis, 1862. Key to the Geology of the Globe; an Essay, by Richard Owen, M.D. 8vo. Boston, 1857. Mémoire sur |’Anatomie et la Physiologie des Polypiers composés d’Eau douce, nommés Lophopodes. Par B.C. Dumortier. 8vo. Pamph. Tournay, 1836. In the Mont Cenis Tunnel. 8vo. Pamph. First Annual Report on the Geology of Wien! By B. F. Mudge. 8vo. Pamph. Lawrence, 1866. Bijdragen tot de Kennis van Nieuw-Guinea. Door Salomon Miiller. Text and Plates. 2vols. Folio. Nieuw-Guinea. Zoologie. Schlegel und Miiller. Text and Plates. 2 vols. Folio. Nieuw-Guinea. Papilionide. De Haan. Kruidkunde, Korthals. Text and Plates. 2vols. Folio. Introduction & l’Entomologie, par M. Th. Lacordaire. 2 vols. 8vo. Paris, 1834. Histoire Naturelle des Insectes. Névroptéres. Par M. P. Rambur. 8vo. Paris, 1842. Iconographie der Land- und Siisswasser-Mollusken. Von Prof. E. A Ross- missler. Heft.1-xu. 4to. Dresden und Leipzig, 1835-44. Exploration Scientifique de l’ Algérie, pendant les Années 1840, 1841, 1842. Histoire Naturelle des Mollusques. Par M.G. P. Deshayes. Tome 1, texte et atlas. 4to. . The Fishes of Malabar. By Francis Day. 4to. London, 1865. The Zodlogy of Captain Beechey’s Voyage. By J. Richardson, N. A. Vigors, ete. 4to. London, 1839. Donovan’s Natural History. British Birds, Vols. 1-1x; Quadrupeds, 1-111; _ Fishes, 1-v; Shells, -v; Insects, 1-xvi. 8vo. London, 1794-1819. Die Europaischen Bohrfliegen (Trypetide). Von H. Loew. Folio. Wien, 1862. Systematische Beschreibung der bekannten Europdischen zweifliigeligen In- sekten, von Johann Wilhelm Meigen. Theile 1-vir. 8vo. Aachen und Hamm, 1818-38. Dipterologische Beitrage, vom Dr. H. Loew. Theile 1-1v. 4to. Posen, 1845-50. Gattungen der Fliegen in xt Kupfertafeln. VonJ.R. Schellenberg. 8vo. Ziirich, 1803. Mémoires de I’Institut Impérial de France. Académie des Sciences. T, xxx. Avec Atlas. 4to. Paris, 1861 Annual Report.] 60 [May 5, Archiv fiir Anatomie, etc. Herausgegeben von Dr. Johannes Muller. Jahrg. 1848-50, 1853-56. $8vo. Berlin. Bulletin de la Société de Géographie. 2° Sér., T. vii, fe. 35-40; 1x, 15-40; X, 1-16; xu, 1-23; xvi. 3°Sér., T. rx-xiv. 4° Sér., T. rv. 8vo. Paris, 1848-59. Annales des Mines. 5° Sér., T. 1-11. Partie Administrative, T. 1. 8vo. Paris, 1852. Acta Eruditorum Anno 1720 publicata. 4to. Lipsiae. Pomarium Britannicum. By Henry Phillips. 8vo. London, 1821. Carolus Illiger. Prodromus systematis Mammalium et Avium. 8vo. Bero- ini, 1811. List of the Specimens of Lepidopterous Insects in the British Museum. By Francis Walker. Part xx. Geometrites. 12mo. London, 1860. Traité du Développement de l)Homme et des Mammiferes. Par T.-L.-G. Bischoff, traduit par A.-J.-L. Jourdan. Accompagné d’un Atlas. vo. et 4to. Paris, 1843. Mémoires de Académie des Sciences, Littérature et Beaux-Arts de Turin, pour les Années X et x1. Sciences physiques et mathematiques, 1'* Partie. 4to. Turin. Académie des Sciences de l'Institut Impériale de France. Mémoires. T. XXVII, Part. 1. 1856. Suite des Mémoires. Année 1718. Comptes Rendus. T. XXXVII-XXXIX, 1853-4. 4to. Paris. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Vols. exuti11, Pts. 1-2; cxLvi. 4to. 1853-8. Druidical Remains at Halifax, Yorkshire, discovered and explained by Rev. J. Watson. 4to. Pamph. London, 1771. Account of Druidical Remains in Derbyshire. By H. Rooke. 4to. Pamph. London, 1794. Account of Druidical Remains in Guernsey. By J. Gosselin. 4to. Pamph. London, 1811. Observations on Circles of Druidical Stones in Scotland. By J. Logan. 4to. Pamph. London 1827. Dissertation on the Topography of the Ancient Babylon. By Major Rennel. 4to. Pamph. London, 1815. Mémoires de l’Académie Impériale et Royale des Sciences et Belles-Lettres de Bruxelles. Tomer. 4to. 1780. By Exchange. Boston Society of Natural History. Memoirs. Vol. 1, Pt. 4. 4to. 1869° Proceedings. Vols. x1, Sign. 22-end; x11, 1-21. 8vo. 1868-9. Condition and Doings. 8vo. May, 1868. Annual,1. 12mo. 1868. Occasional Papers, 1. The Entomological Correspondence of Thaddeus William Harris, edited by Samuel H. Scudder. 8vo. 1869. North America. A working map, prepared for the Boston Society of Natural History by William C. Cleveland. fol. 1868. Queries on the Red Sandstone of Vermont and its Relations to other Rocks. By the Rev. John B. Perry. 8vo. Pamph. Boston, 1868. Note on a Point in the Habits of the Diatomacee and Desmidiacee. By Arthur Mead Edwards. Syvo. Pamph. Boston, 1868. 1869.] 61 [Annual Report. On the Development of a Dragon-Fly (Diplax). By A. S. Packard, Jr., M.D. 8vo. Pamph. Boston, 1868. On the Structure of the Ovipositor and Homologous Parts in the Male Insect. By A. S. Packard, Jr.. M.D. 8vo. Pamph. Boston, 1868. On the Weapons and Military Character of the Race of the Mounds. By Col. Charles Whittlesey. 4to. Pamph. Boston, 1867. On the Distortion of Pebbles in Conglomerates, with Tlustrations from Rangely Lake, in Maine. By Geo. L. Vose. 4to. Pamph. Boston, 1868. Account of some observations on the metamorphosis of Siredon into Am- blystoma, by Prof. O. C. Marsh. 8vo. Pamph. Boston, 1868. Synopsis of the Birds of South Carolina. By Elliott Coues, M.D. 8vo. Pamph. Boston, 1868. Notes on Birds observed in Western Iowa,etc. By J. A. Allen. 4to. Pamph. Boston, 1868. Descriptions of North American Bees. No. 1. By E. T. Cresson. 8vo. Pamph. Boston, 1868. Notes on Hesperomannia. By William T. Brigham. 4to. Pamph. Boston, 1868. On the Nature of the Movements involved in the Changes of Level of Shore Lines. By N.S. Shaler. 8vo. Pamph. Boston, 1868. Catalogue of the Reptiles and Batrachians found in the vicinity of Sar field, Mass. By J. A. Allen. 8vo. Pamph. Boston, 1868-9. Some Observations on the Fauna of Madeira. Be Francis H. Brown, M. D. 8vo. Pamph. Boston, 1868. Native Birds of the Department of Vera Cruz, by Prof. F. Sumichrast. Translated by Dr. T. M. Brewer. 8vo. Pamph. Boston, 1868. On the Land-Slides in the Vicinity of Portland, Me. By Edward S. Morse. 8vo. Pamph. Boston, 1868. A Synopsis of the Birds of the Hawaiian Islands. By Sanford B. Dole. 8vo. Pamph. Boston, 1869. Notes on the Eruption of the Hawaiian Volcanoes, 1868. By William T. Brigham. 4to. Pamph. Boston, 1869. Four new Genera of Hawaiian Plants. By William T. Brigham and Horace Mann. 4to. Pamph. Boston, 1869. The Physical Geology of Eastern Ohio. By Colonel Charles Whittlesey. 4to. Pamph. Boston, 1869. Memoir of Thaddeus William Harris. By Thomas Wentworth Higginson. 8vo. Pamph. Boston, 1869. From the Publishing Committee. The Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London. No. 40. 8vo. 1864. The Record of Zoological Literature. Edited by Albert C. L. G. Giinther. 1866-7. Vols. 11-1v. 8vo. London, 1867, 1868. Catalogue of a Collection of American Birds belonging to Philip Lutley Sclater, M. A. 8vo. London, 1862. Species Filicum. By Sir William Jackson Hooker. Vols. 11-v. $8vo. London, 1860-64. oe Annual Report.) 62 (May 5, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth and Ninth Reports on the Noxious, Beneficial and other Insects of the State of New York. By Asa Fitch,M.D. 8vo. Albany, 1865. Geological Survey of Illinois. A. H. Worthen, Director. Vols. 1-1. 8vo. Springfield, 1866. The Butterflies of North America. By Wm. H. Edwards. Parts 1-11. 4to. Philadelphia, 1868. Palzontographical Society. Vols. xx-xx1. Issued for 1866 and 1867. 4to. London, 1868. Archiv fiir Naturgeschichte. Jahrg. x1v-xvy. 8vo. Berlin, 1848-9. Rede bei Eroffnung der Versammlung deutscher Naturforscher und Aerzte am 18ten September 1829. Von F. Tiedemann. 4to. Pamph. Heidelberg, 1829. Archiv fir Anthropologie. Band 11, Heft. 1-2. 4to. Braunschweig, 1868. Catalogue of Scientific Papers (1800-1863). Compiled and published by the Royal Society of London. Vol.1. 4to. London, 1867. Synopsis Filicum; or, a Synopsis of all known Ferns. By the late Sir Wil- liam Jackson Hooker and John Gilbert Baker. 8vo. London, 1868. Lieferungs-Ausgabe von A. Stieler’s Handatlas. Lief. 24-28. Folio. Gotha, 1867. Die politische Neu-Gestaltung von Nord-Deutschland im Jahre 1866. 4to. Pamph. Gotha. Catalogus Coleopterorum hucusque descriptorum, synonymicus et systemati- cusautoribus Dr. Gemminger et B. de Harold. Tom. 1-1. 8vyo. Monachii, 1868. Ornithologie Européenne, par C. D. Degland et Z. Gerbe. TomesiI-m. 8vo. Paris, 1867. From the Wolcott Fund. Recherches sur les Ossemens Fossiles. Par Georges Cuvier. Atlas, Tomes 1-11. 4to. Paris, 1836. Deposited in the Binney Library. History of the United Netherlands. By John Lothrop Motley. Vol. m1. 8vo. New York, 1868. Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin. Edited by John Bigelow. $8vo. Philadelphia, 1868. Modern Inquiries. By Jacob Bigelow, M.D. 8vo. Boston, 1867. Human Life in Shakespeare. By Henry Giles. 16mo. Boston, 1868. A History of Massachusetts in the Civil War. By William Schouler. 8vo. Boston, 1868. _ Recollections of a Busy Life. By Horace Greeley. 8vo. New York, 1868. Deposited by the Republican Institution. 1869.) 63 [Annual Report. e ADDITIONS TO THE MUSEUM DURING THE YEAR ENDING APRIL 30, 1869. MAMMALS AND CoMPARATIVE ANATOMY. Skin of black-footed Kangaroo, collected by Capt. I. E. A. Todd at King George’s Sound, Australia, by Mr. Nath. Wales. A large, white birch log, bearing marks of the teeth of the beaver, and samples of wood used by the beavers as food, etc., from Rangely Lake, Me., by Mr. Luther Hills. A specimen of Vespertilio carolina from Ashburnham, Mass., by Mrs. Addison Howe. Five house mice, Hesperomys leucopus, in alco- hol, from Hart’s Location, N. H., by Dr. S. A. Bemis. Cranium and Atlas of Felis from the Cape of Good Hope, by Dr. Edw. Gilchrist, U.S. N. A skel- eton of Negress from Zanzibar, Africa, by Mr. Samuel V. Goodhue. Skull of an albatross, Diomedea exulans, from the South Atlantic, by Dr. G. F. Waters. An embryo spermophile from Arizona, by Capt. F. Dame. A young black bear, , by Mr. Wm. T. Adams. Three fatty tumors from abdominal cay- ity of domestic fowl, by Mr. P. S. Sprague. A specimen of the star-nosed mole, Condylura cristata, from Brookline, by Mr. J. E. Cabot. Boston a : 6 Cash . ; : ° ; : : : General Fund. 17 Shares Bates Manufacturing Co. _. 35 Everett Mills . eoeee 30 “ Hamilton Woolen Manuf. Co. Zs : A 1 ‘ Lawrence Manuf. Co. . : = S 80 ‘* Washington Mills . ap Ue teal ke 114 +“ Vermont and Canada R. R. Co. 5 “ : 12 ‘£ Cocheco Manuf. Co. : : : 3 2 * lLowell Manuf. Co. 3 a 4 5 4 ‘“ Waconia Manuf. Co. 6 A A 5 3 ‘ Pepperell Manuf. Co. . A 3 . a « Neptune Ins. Co. . = ; ° . Boston Ins. Co. oa 000 Vemops { Cent. & Vermont & Canada R. Re Co. 8 onds . ; ; é $10,000 Albany City Bonds . $1,000 Chicago & N. Western R. R. Co.’s Bonds" 95 Shares Michigan Central R.R.Co. . 50 “ Ogdensb’g & Lake Champlain R R. Pref. Stks. 88 ‘“ Philadelphia, Wilmington & Balt. R.R. Co. 20 ‘“ National Bankof Redemption .<«. . Miscellaneous. Unsetiled Accounts : ; ; 4 5 - $24.43 Cash : PE CL eh as 2,544.14 mrs outstanding bills -;- . ., ». «. - Total value of Property April 30, 1869 . 5 5 - ne ee sae 30) 1868, PO oe Diminution of value the past year Spt her tte meds $186,030.19 694.95 $15,000.00 10,122.00 142.45 $6,250.00 1,827.50 425.00 $41,105.00 $1,407.63 5,212.75 1,072.75 657.25 121.94 DM CRO ROR DOR COR RTE oom . S2SeSsesses5 Sssssssssss3 ~ a ~~ ~ ae DO SoS . aoe oee ReoaSssss _! 1 CO ICO 1D NAAN ~ $2,568.57 177.86 $136,725.14 25,264.45 8,502.50 47,239.49 6,000.00 8,472.82 92,817.25 2,390.71 $327,411.86 $340,710.79 $13,298.93 Annual Report.) | 70 [May 5, This apparent diminution is occasioned principally by a reduction to the amount of $9,356.00 in the estimated value of the manufactur- ing and insurance stocks received under the Walker bequest, by the expense of binding the pamphlets and periodicals which have accumu- lated for several years, and by the unusually large cost of the publi- cations, including the Harris Correspondence, etc. ‘The publication of this work, of which three hundred copies are still undisposed of, was authorized nearly six years ago by the Council, and has cost about $2,000. We receive in exchange for our Memoirs and Proceedings, the publications of Foreign Scientific Societies; and in this way the value of the library has been increased during the past year by the sum of, at least, five thousand dollars. It should be observed that a large portion of the income of the Society cannot be applied to general purposes. One half of the in- come of the Walker Fund is not received by the Treasurer, or in- cluded in the above receipts, but is reserved as a prize fund for essays on subjects relating to Natural History, and for other special purposes. The income of the Wolcott Fund can only be used in the purchase of books; and that of the Pratt Fund is applicable only to the Concho- logical Department. Under an order of the Council, the Bulfinch Street Estate Fund, with its accruing income, is to constitute an accumulating Building Fund, and for this reason, such income also is not included in the receipts of the Treasurer. All which is respectfully submitted, E. PICKERING, Treasurer of the Boston Society of Natural History. Boston, April 30, 1869. Mr. T. T. Bouvé, on behalf of the Trustees, presented the following report on the Trust Funds of the Society for the past year:— {Annual Report. 71 1869.] Dr. Tuos. T. Bouvé, Cuas. J. Spracurt anp Epwarp Pickrerine, TrustTers, In account Or. WITH THE CouRTIS FUND OF THE Boston Society oF NATURAL HIsTorRY. . 1868. 1868. Sept. 26. |To Cash received for Interest on $10,000 St. Sept. 26. |By Cash paid to Edw. Pickering, Treasurer, $300.00 1869. Louis Bonds ; é : 0 $3800.00 1869. March. “ received for Interest on $10,000 St. March 26. “ 6 “ “s 800.00- Louis Bonds : ; . . 300.00 April. “« paid for Stock, as follows: April. “received for $10,000 St. Louis Bonds «* 50 Shares Globe Bank, at 125. 6 6,250.00 sold at $81 (it being thought best «¢ 30 Shares Phil, & Wil. R.R., at 52, 1,827.50 by the Trustees to invest in prop- ‘¢ paid Treasurer balance cash . C 22.50 erty not so readily transferable “ by delivery only, and less likely to cause loss by robbery) . ; 8,100.00 [The Trustees intend to transfer from General ——— Fund stocks to make this prop- $8,700.00 $8,700.00 erty again $10,000.] | Errors Excepted. Boston, April 30, 1869. THOS. T. BOUVE, SERAGUE, | Teer. E. PICKERING, Memo., April 30, 1869. The property of this Fund consists on date, of 50 Shares Globe Bank at 125. , . i Faas See, Se “ss - 5 é ames 4 $6,250.00 385 Shares Phil. & Wil. R.R.at52 . : 2 ‘ 0 ‘ ° . . . c 6 . é 1,827.50 WU. S.-Bonds' 7400 (Transterred from General Fund) =.“ whe«s +» @& “»s 5 « « » « 425.00 $8,502.50 (May 5, Annual Report.} BrFEL‘OS — | 6162 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ° e ‘e puey uo Yseyp 00°88L'8 Oe aie Ga an a ge NE a A Ee 42 YUL WWouIaAy, soreys 9% 00° FOR‘ 2s8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OIL 4B yueg SvLV soIvys 6L JO S}SISMOD O}Up TO puny sIqy Jo Ajxodorg OUT, ‘69ST ‘Og IAdy “ower ‘ONTUAMOTA “ ‘SAMISANL ) CAOVUAS ‘SVE ‘SVHO ‘TANOM “L ‘SOHL "698 ‘08 [dy ‘u0jsog ‘poydooxny sr01InT ST'SoP‘ Ld SL'Soh' LG 00°FOL ee a aan * . *4sor0juT wod “NOD 04 Sursuo0joq “ETT 4& OST‘os vAoqe Jo mou tedoad LOF POstoood ‘g judy GZ TPL‘S : Aayua yxou tod sv 480 “1OJUT OF woryzodoad ssoy %ett 4B OST'ak ‘Atoqqoxr Aq ssoy 03 “joatqns }OU puR ‘spuog sB o[qvAoAUod ATT -pvo.t 0s you £}.A0d01d ploy 04 zexes yt Surspnl Aoyy ‘soojsnay, JO 940A Aq pos ‘spuog °g ‘qQ «40f POATOOOL 45 'g [dy 83° TPZ wot} pred yunoure Jey ouo ‘puny 6F'L6), : , . * purty mo oouved Ysto Ag} ‘0g tadyw TON[BAA FO SOO}SNAT, WoIZ PoAtooor ,, ‘g [dy 00'eeL‘e : ; : : 2061 00°SLe Woy pred yunoure Fey ouo ‘pang 1B “yuBg JuowosLy, sorvys 9g TOY[VAA JO S90jsnA], WOIF poayooat ,, ‘TL Woleyy 00°606'S OTL 3B ‘YUU svlpy soIvys 6T 83° L8T : * spuog “698T SSMO][[OJ SBYIOIG 4, yy & adyw "9 ' stuodnoy 4so10jUy OF poAtoovoI ‘00q. 00°SSF : (00F ) »5 295) TORE wey he a? yy | PT OLVL || 19° 16S Woy} pred yunoure J[ey ouo ‘puny *G98T TOHIBAA JO SOOJsNAY, WOIZ PoAaTooot ,, 190 L8°80T ; (00T ) 55 Oe 0 PA = pp ” "ydog 00°918 wou} pred yunoure J[ey ow ‘puny Z0' OL : (OO Ta) ease TAL MEE. tI > "00, TON[VAA JO Soojpsnay, WoAF PoaToot ,, ‘ydog GL LIS . (006 ) » Dy = 3y) yo” ” ‘yO 0§°S9T . ‘spuog °§ ‘11 GZ 98 . (OS Yo A ‘adag TO SsuOdNOD 4sSd.10}UT AOF pPoATodo.T ‘T Ane GL's0r$ : (001) spuog 19 Ss IO} pred yse9 Ag “Aqne ST L28 : oYVP OF JUNODOV UO. DOUBLE yse9 OL} ‘08 dy *S98T ESOS eee = —— ot ‘XMOLSIFT ee NT LO ALaTO0g NOLSOG FHL tO GNOW ASNAdX Tviloudg AGNV Eee | UANTV AA AHL BLIM ‘AQ «= ENQOOOV NI ‘SHRLSOUT, “ONIUHHOIG GUVMGY GNV DTAyvadg “f ‘SVHH ‘“FANOG ‘7, ‘SOHN, ‘aq [Annual Report. 13 1869.} Dr. Tuos. T. Bouvté, Cuas. J. SpRacuE anp Epwarp Pickrrine, TRUSTEES, IN ACCOUNT CR. WITH THE INCOME FROM THE WALKER FunD oF THE Boston Society oF NaturaAt History. 1868. 1868. Sept. |To Cash, six months’ Interest on note secured Sept. |By Cash paid to Treasurer, one half of amount by mortgage . arte estes, $750.00 received on date for Interest on Oct. ‘é six months’ Interest on note secured Note. 3 2 , 3 A $375.00 by mortgage ee ree a0 483.15 “‘ paid to Trustees of Prize Fund . 875.00 1869. Oct. «paid to Treasurer, one half amount March 1, ‘¢ six months’ Interest on note secured received Interest on note secured : by oT eae ae Peace Meets 750.00 by mortgage i a year 241.58 April 5. ‘¢ six months’ Interest on note secured ‘¢ paid to Trustees of Prize Fund . 241.57 by mortgage SS 7 483.15 1869. March 1. ‘¢ paid to Treasurer, one half amount received on date . . : 9 375.00 ae ‘¢ paid to Trustees of Prize Fun 6 375.00 April 5. ‘paid to Treasurer, one half amount received ondate. . . . 241.57 aS ‘‘ paid to Trustees of Prize Fund . 241.58 $2,466.80 $2,466.30 Errors Excepted. Boston, April 30, 1869. THOS. T. BOUVE, ’ CHAS. JAS. SPRAGUE, } TRUSTEES, kK. PICKERING, [May 5, T4 Annual Report.] SP'F9Z CZF OF ZT . . . e e « e e e e e } 00°22 ‘OL . ~ . e . e . e . * e 00°000‘SLS$ . . . . . ° ° e e e e e e e e e e e e pury wo seo a. _ AOR ye ‘Y00jS YUv_ JUOWOIT, sorveys F8 . 2 * WIS “gq ‘f JO OJON ONBSIO[W JO S}sIsMOO puny sty} Jo Ayxodorg oyT, “69ST ‘08 Tady “owoyy ‘ONTINAMOLA “A ‘TAOWVUMdS ‘SVL 'SVHO ‘TANOT WL ‘SOHL *SHLLYOWY, “698 ‘08 Id y ‘uojsog *poydooxg srong 'eg'989'TIS CZ LL ‘+ puny [eromoy) WO POATOIOI 49 Py) GL'FF0' OL 2 * ASI y8 098'8$ ono Sv A[IPBor OS PoAIOJSUVIy 9q Ge'989'TTS jouuvs yvyy Aqzodoid ur ysoAUr 04 4saq IU Snoyy Suraq 41 ‘svoysn4y, JO CPSP oo ke * 898p Uo puvy uo YstO {Oe O}0A 4q PIOS SPU “S “1 4OJ POATOIOI 4» Thady 00'GEL‘OL : 3 : * FL0GL 3B “9098 8&°8PS * spuog “6981 yuvg jyuou1y, Jo sores FQ los pied ,, Widy uo suodnog 4SoIOJUT IOJ POATVIOI yy ” "*G698T 00°0SP o esesj10u1 £q poinoas $0399 : * spuog, ‘S ‘A 009% a0F pred ,, ‘00d oyou mo 4so10}U] «se + ae 1.40 1.30 1 English inches and hundredths. ~ 1869.) Pl [Cones. The upper incisors, besides being larger, show a difference in the position of the groove, which runs between the inner and middle, instead of along the middle third of the tooth. Except in being pro- portionally larger, the molars show little difference; but, age for age, the transverse oval pits appear rather shallower. The difference in the “ zygomatic processes of the temporal bones” (i. e., of the squamosal), given by Audubon and Bachman, has no existence in any of the numerous specimens compared; these processes having as nearly as possible the same shape. That of palustris is absolutely larger, proportionately to the greater size of the whole skull. The malar is longer, and also stouter; its greater length is chiefly due to development of both anterior and posterior processes; the point of the latter reaches half way from the zygomatic spur of the squamosal to the tympanic orifice. Notwithstanding the very appre- ciable difference in the size of the external eye, the bony orbits show little discrepancies in size. There is, however, a singular difference in the upper border of the orbital cavity. In sylvaticus the postorbital processes of the frontal have the form of slender spicula directed backward, touching the parietals at their extremities, transforming what would otherwise be a deep notch into an actual oval foramen on either side of the frontal; in palustris, both notch and foramen usually disappear by blending of this process with the frontal; sometimes, however, a minute opening remains. Similarly, the anteorbital pro- cesses in sylvaticus form a deep transverse notch, of which only a trace exists in palustris. ‘The median anterior extremity of the frontal is prolonged in a point further between the nasals; while the posterior extremities of the latter are also more acutely pointed, and run further up on either side of the frontal. ‘The slender nasal process of the intermaxillary is longer. _The base of the skull is both relatively and absolutely broader, in consequence of the size and lateral projection of the paroccipital. The form of the lower jaw, no less than the size of the incisors, would seem to indicate greater masticatory power. The various ridges and roughened depressions for muscular attachment are better pronounced. The angle of the jaw has more sweep, and extends further backward; the coronoid process is higher, wider, and more upright. The skull of a full grown and mature (as shown by the dentition), but not an old animal, exhibits the following condition of the several Coues.] 92 [June 2, sutures, most of the bones, as will be seen, remaining unanchylosed. The epencephalic arch can be detached entire; the basi-, ex-, and par- occipital elements are completely soldered together; but the superoc- cipital shows traces of its original separation, its suture with the exoccipitals displaying the part it takes in the formation of the fora- men magnum (production of the characteristic notch at the upper border). With the arch are brought away the petro-mastoid, tym- panic and large bulla ossea; but neither of these three are soldered to it; and the two last, moreover, are further separable from the petro-mastoid; the remarkable quadrate platform of bone surmounting this arch is completely anchylosed with the superoccipital, and seems indeed to form an integral part of that bone, leading to a suspicion that it never formed a distinct interparietal.! Just in advance of this questionable plate, moreover, are two distinct little bones, irreg- ularly triangular, together forming a lozenge on the median line; they remain suturely connected with the parietals on removal of the epencephalic vertebra. These may be a bifid interparietal, or ossa wormiana. ‘The parietals are disconnected with each other, and from all surroundings. The squamosals may be removed with some little ‘difficulty; they are free from parietal, frontal, and malar, but begin- ing to anchylose with alisphenoid. ‘The nasals and premaxillaries are very easily removed; a spongy mass is brought away with the former. The lachrymals almost fall out of themselves. The sphenoid may be loosened, but not entirely detached, without violence ; traces of the union of the pterygoids with it remain; the limits of ali- and basi- sphenoid are plainly seen. The interfrontal suture is plain. The superior maxillaries are distinct from the frontal, and also show the median palatal suture; but the malars and palatines are both com- pletely soldered with them. The large stout palatines, in fact, appear to be the most solid bones of the skull. Besides their extensive and firm union with the maxillaries, their palatal plates fuse together, forming with the corresponding processes of the maxillaries, a strong, bony bridge across the back part of the palate, connecting the molar alveoli. The two halves of the lower jaw remain separable. With advancing age nearly all these sutures become obliterated. The most persistent are those between the nasals and their surround- ings, the spheno-occipital, the squamo-malar, and the symphysis menti. These I have never found obliterated, though—particularly - 1 On the other hand, see Owen, Comp. Anat. and Phys. Vert., II, pp. 316, 367. 1869. ] . 93 {Coues, the last named—they may amount to virtual consolidation. The petro-mastoid and tympanic bulla are very late in codssifying with surrounding bones. The basi-occipital (but not the basi-sphenoid) is perforated by what appears to be an extension of, establishing direct communication between, the tympanic air-cavities. According to Owen (op. cit., p. 368), the basi-sphenoid is similarly perforated in Lepus timidus. Mr. H. A. Purdie announced the capture by Mr. C. F. Maynard, of three specimens of the rare Tennessee Warbler, in Newton. Rev. R. C. Waterston called the Society’s attention to the approaching centennial anniversary of the birth of Baron von Humboldt, and suggested the celebration of the day by the Society in some public manner. The proposition was re- ceived with great favor by the members who subsequently spoke upon the subject, and it was voted, on the motion of Mr. Waterston, to choose a committee of three to consider the subject and take such action as seemed advisable. The President appointed Rev. Mr. Waterston, Dr. 8. Kneeland and Mr. 8. H. Scudder, as the committee, to which the Pres-_ ident and his Honor, Mayor Shurtleff, were subsequently added. June 16, 1869. ‘The President in the chair. Seventeen members present. The following papers were presented : — Noricre or A CycLopPean Pig. By Exixiotr Cougs, M.D., U.S.A. _ Iam indebted to my friend Dr. W. F. Smith, of the Army, for the opportunity of examining the head of a newly born cyclopean pig. The specimen, possession of which Dr. Smith has generously relin- quished, has been deposited in Professor Wyman’s cabinet. It is Coues.]} 94 {June 16, interesting from its apparent bearing upon the question of the morphology of the cranium. If my interpretation of the general con- dition, and identification of parts, be not incorrect, there are un- equivocal indications that this skull is composed of four vertebre. The modifications of the cranial bones produce a singular configura- tion of the external parts. The snout, or nose proper, is separated from the mouth-parts by a wide and deep fissure, reaching half way to the ears, in a horizontal plane, and in the longitudinal axis of the head. At the base of this fissure there is a transverse slit in the skin, across from side to side, representing the eyes, meeting on the median line, and directly continuous with each other; this cutaneous opening is about an inch and a third long by a third wide in the middle. With the exception of this slit, the whole face is contin- uously covered with proper integument, of normal texture, sparsely beset with slender white hairs. The gape of the mouth is unusually small; the lower jaw and lips offer nothing very peculiar; but the upper jaw is much shortened (through intermaxillary deficiency, as will presently appear) and the lip is extended some distance beyond it, to meet the lower lip; itis compressed from side to side, and has no nasal opening. The lower jaw bears six teeth, whereof the two lat- eral ones on each side are conical, acute and enamelled; the median 1889.] 05 [Coues. pair obtuse, widened, each with obscure indications of three cusps, and barely projecting from the gums. There are three teeth in the upper jaw, separated from each other; the lateral ones, apparently canines, being loosely set in, and projecting laterally outward from the upper alveoli; the third, directly on the median line, and seem- ingly representing the lateral pair of incisors combined, is only set in gristle, from which its hard, conical cusp projects forwards as well as downward, and from which its root was found, on dissection, to pro- ‘trude inwards. The shape of the root, which is flattened and later- ally expanded, seems to confirm the suspicion that this single tooth represents connate incisors. The detached nasal chambers form a curious fleshy and bony “horn” or proboscis, running straight out from the forehead, on the median line, above the ocular slit, as far as, or rather beyond, the end of the maxillary snout. This proboscis has the form of a nearly regular gradually tapering cone to near the end, where it suddenly enlarges to terminate in a circular disk, with a single central hole— a common nostril. The general shape calls to mind the snout of the star-nosed mole, barring the fimbriez. The rest of the head is not noticeably misshapen, though rather short for its depth. ‘The ears are large and well formed. There is not such palatal malformation as might be anticipated in a case of this sort; on the contrary, the bony roof of the mouth and - its mucous membrane are perfect. Just behind the palate, in the normal position of the posterior nares, there is a slit leading into a roundish depression capable of holding a pea; this, however, does not (nor could it, in consequence of the abnormal condition of the bony parts, presently to be described) lead into the nasal cavities, but forms a cul-de-sac, only perforated by the openings of the Eustachian tubes, which are large enough to admit a straw. The nasal'sense-capsules are wholly unossified; a conoida]l mass of gristly and membranous convolutions fills the nasal chamber, in place of ethmoid and turbinals; the imperfect cartilaginous septum only extends to within three lines of the end of the snout, there being a common orifice. There is no cribriform plate: the olfactories pass by a large irregular opening from the brain into the nose, and proceed more than half way to the tip of the snout before giving off any ram- ifications. The rudimentary eyes, only distinguishable with some difficulty, are imbedded in a mass of cellular and fatty tissue that fills the fossa Coues.] 96 [June 16, at the base of the great fissure. Notwithstanding their small size, the orbital cavity has a number of muscles of little less than ordinary dimensions, but scarcely recognizable in consequence of imperfect or faulty insertions, and displaced origins trom the distortion of the bony parts. The optic nerves emerge from the cranium at the bottom of a large opening. The superior maxillary divisions of the fifth pass through this same Opening, across the floor of the orbital fossa, into and through the maxillary foramina (which are placed side by side, near the median line of the skull) and ramify in an undistinguishable mass of muscu- lar and cellular tissue that lies upon the bones and forms the cheek and upper lip. As is usual in these cases, the great commissure of the brain is wanting, the cerebral hemispheres being fused and presenting a single smooth convexity. Such are the principal features of the soft parts chiefly concerned in the formation of the monstrosity; the shape and position of many of the cranial bones is equally anomalous. ‘The osseous abnormities increase in number and degree from behind forward,.as would nat- urally be expected, and culminate among the elements of the “ rhin- encephalic vertebra.” Remarkable openings in the skull occur, isolating the several arches in great measure, and exhibiting them to the physical eye as clearly as they can be seen with the mind’s. Particularly in the case of the fourth or anterior segment of the. skull, we have the unusual spectacle of the centrum and hemal arch distinct and removed from the neural; the latter alone enclosing the neural axis; and the former hanging from the cranium, somewhat after the manner of the succeeding hemal arch (lower jaw), sus- pended by its own pleurapophysis alone, and not otherwise attached to the rest of the skull than by the zygoma. The general condition, in fact, comes near being an ocular demonstration of four vertebrz in the mammalian skull. Detailed descriptions of the bones principally concerned will follow; we have here to note first the general condition of the skull asa whole, and next as composed of several segments. The base of the cranium proper presents three principal openings or foramina lacera, succeeding each other from behind forward. The first of these appears to correspond to, and to result from, the con- fluence of the fissure lacere posteriores and mediz. It is an irreg- ularly crescentic opening (one on either side the basi-occipital and 1869.) 97 ; [Coues. -sphenoid) bounded anteriorly by the alisphenoid, mesially by the bases just mentioned, and posteriorly by the basi- and ex-occipital; it would be a large roundish vacuity were it not for the projection into it from the outside of the large petrosal and inflated tympanic bulla; the fact that these do not reach the occipital base is what causes the merging into one of the posterior and middle fissure basis cranil. The second opening is a very large one, through which the tip of a finger may be passed, leading into the median optic fossa (conjoined orbital cavities), of an irregular, somewhat cordate shape, circumscribed behind by the alisphenoids, and before by what appears to be an orbito-sphenoid plate (see below). ‘This gives passage to the optic nerves, as has been said, as well as to the second division of the fifth. ‘The third opening is the irregular foramen in the cu- riously malformed frontal bone, giving exit to the olfactories, and standing in place of a ‘‘cribriform plate of ethmoid.” These three fissures (the posterior one lateral and divided in two, the anterior two median and single) indicate, in a general way, the places of division of the skull into its four neural arches. The zygoma, composed as usual of squamosal and malar, preserves posteriorly its ordinary condition ; anteriorly, however, it curves inward as it passes forward, and meets its fellow on the median line, over the middle of the superior maxillary. A small bone, extending transversely across the median line, serves as a bridge across the anterior extremities of the malars, binding them together in front, and completing a perfect half circle or horse-shoe shaped bony bar, that horizontally surrounds the sides and front of the skull from one glenoid fossa to the other. This bone is formed of the two lachrymal bones fused. The upper jaw hangs below and projects forward from this halfring, connected behind with the base of the skull by the palatals and vomer. Its superficial resemblance to a lower jaw is very striking. The occipital segment offers nothing specially noteworthy. The coalesced ex- and par-occipitals are distinct from basi- and super- occipitals; all four have nearly if not quite their proper shape and position. The basisphenoid is distinct from the basioccipital, but not from the presphenoid; with which latter the next centrum is also fused in | great measure, and in fact is less demonstrable as such than usual, in consequence of the extensive blending of the palatals. A vomer is scarcely indicated except by a median longitudinal ridge upon the PROCEEDINGS B. S. N. H.—VOL. XIII. 7 OCTOBER, 1869. Coues.] F 98 [June 16, last named bones. The alisphenoid is large, and reaches the well- formed parietals, thus supporting its neural spine; it forms a stout pillar on either side, is but little expanded, and has no connections whatever either before or behind, in its continuity. The diapophy- sis of this segment is confluent with the squamosal,— not with the petrosal, asim many mammals. The last named (otic capsule) is of large size, and distinct from all surroundings. This, and the not very dissimilarly shaped tympanic bulla form two large osseous masses, on either side, distinct from each other and from adjacent bones, nearly filling up what would otherwise be an open space between the neura- pophyses of the penultimate and last vertebrae. The intercalated squamosal, with its confluent mastoid, fills up what would otherwise be a further vacuity in the walls of the cranium; articulating with (besides the petrosal and tympanic) three of the elements of the occipital behind, the parietal above, and the alisphenoid and malar in front. It is of great size; its zygomatic process is small, and curved inward. The parietals are well developed, and of normal characters. The next neural arch is mainly represented, as far as ocular demonstration can go, by the singularly shaped frontal, its spine. This bone has a pyriform shape; that is, it is made a cone by the curling under of its sides (or perhaps of its orbital plates) until they come together and coalesce below, and then suffers a constriction near its anterior extremity, the small end being then drawn out, and representing two-thirds of a ring which is deficient below; the scroll-like nasal fitting upon the ring. The upper surface of the bone is smooth, and shows the median furrow indicative of its development from two centres; the under surface is irregular, with several pits and foramina. It mostly articulates with the parietals, but the lower lat- eral corners touch the squamosals; it is, of course, widely separated from the superior maxillary and malar, which lie some distance in front and below. To the under surface of the frontal are attached two anomalous bones. The inferior and much the larger of these is a transversely elongated thin plate, adherent along its upper or ante- rior border with the posterior border of the frontal; touching the alisphenoids on either extremity; its free posterior border, concave, or nicked out, forms the anterior border of the large vacuity already de- scribed as leading from the cranial cavity into the orbital fossa. This bone I take to be orbito-sphenoidal, and therefore to represent the frontal neurapophyses; so judging from its position and relations, par- - 1869.] 99 [Coues. ticularly to the optic nerves. The other bone is merely a little curved splint bridging across the lower part of the frontal ring from side to side, and partially making up for the defective condition of the latter. I do not know to what, if any, bone this bit is to be referred, and prefer not to hazard a conjecture. The hemal arch of this third vertebra is not noticeably deformed, though rather unusually short- ened, thickened and bent upward at the end. Each moiety is dis- tinct, and has three projecting teeth; the future molars and premolars still lie buried in the jaw. As we trace hemal arches of the mammalian cranium, in the light of Owen’s conception of them, we find that they are regularly grad- uated from behind forward, as to the kind and degree of their connection with the rest of the skull. That of the occipital segment is remoyed to the thorax, and only connected by muscular tissue. That of the parietal is suspended in the neck by ligamentous bands that may acquire bone-earth along a part or the whole of their course. That of the frontal is in contact with the rest of the skull, and mov- ably articulated. That of the nasal is suturally united, in firm apposition, not only by extensive and intricate pleurapophysial con- nections, but also by that junction of the hemapophyses and hemal spines with neural elements that is necessary to close up the neural axis in front, and gives the more or less conical configuration to this extremity of the vertebral series. The obscurity that hangs over the “nasal vertebra,” and the consequent difficulty of actually distinguish- ing neural and hemal “ arches,” or of recognizing a “vertebra” at all, is commonly held — with what show of reason it is not my pur- pose to inquire — to result in great measure from this extreme modi- fication in the face of a special emergency that does not elsewhere occur. Be this as it may, we have in the present instance of this malformed skull, a nasal vertebra, the neural and hemal arches of which are distinct and separated from each other, and which displays vertebral characters at least as plainly as either of the other cranial sepments do. It consists cf a neural spine, surrounding and enclos- ing the prolongation of the neural axis, uplifted from its centrum, wanting neurapophyses, and with no osseous sense-capsule; and of a detached hzmal arch, represented by pleurapophyses, heemapophyses, (and hemal spine?) joined to its centrum, by the latter attached to the rest of the skull, with which it is only further joined by its “ appendages.’ The single nasal bone, apparently developed from one centre, is Coues.] 100 (June 16, rolled under like a scroll, to form an imperfect cylinder. Its only articulation is with the ring-like prolongation of the frontal, upon which its base is fitted by an oblique overlapping suture.” It projects straight forward, like a horn, and enfolds the gristly and membran- ous sense-capsule; no osseous ethmoid, or turbinate bones, exist. The passage from the nasal chamber into the cranium is straight and open. The palatines lack orbital plates or processes, are fused together and to the vomer, and consist chiefiy of palatine plates, united in the usual way to the corresponding parts of the superior maxillary. Their chief peculiarity is seen behind, in the place where the poste- rior nares normally occur. The passage is blocked up by the fusion of the bones into a solid plate that reaches the sphenoid centre and forms a transverse wall. The palatines abut externally against the descending processes of the alisphenoids; along the line of junction there is a curved groove in which the loose pterygoids rest. ‘The lat- ter are small, irregularly falcate in shape, and completely detached both from sphenoids and palatines, as in monotrematous orders. The superior maxillaries are fused along the median palatal line, but else- where distinct from each other: and they form the apex of the jaw to the exclusion of intermaxillaries. Their palatal plates are their most perfectly ossified parts; for the rest, they are made up in great- est part of large alveolar cavities, filled with the future molars and premolars, the walls of which cavities, everywhere thin and fragile, almost spongy, are defective, particularly along the line where they should properly join the palatal plate, displaying the contained teeth through extensive vacuities. The inflated walls of these cavi- ties form the only osseous floor of the orbits; they project like bulle upward and backward toward the alisphenoids, from which, however, they are entirely separated by a continuous deep and wide fissure. The teeth that have cut the gum have been already noticed ; the lat- | eral pair are presumably canine from their relation to the superior maxillary, but occupy the place of incisors. The apex of the upper jaw is defective, and presents a depression between these two lateral teeth, occupied, in the recent state, by a cartilaginous mass, in which the median incisor was buried. The upper surface of the maxil- laries offers a deep transverse depression, into which open the large foramina for transmission of the second division of the trigeminus; posteriorily it rises up to meet the under surface of the malars and be articulated with them, in a nearly straight and horizontal line from side to side. 1869.] 101 [Agassiz. As has been said, there are no intermaxillaries to be recognized as such, the superior maxillaries forming the apex of the jaw; and - the gristly mass lying upon their extremity, and containing the inci- sor, being apparently the rudiments of those bones. Notes oN BEAVER Dams. By ALex. AGASsIz. During a residence of nearly two years on Keweenaw Point, I had oceasion to examine a large number of beaver dams, most of them still mhabited. I was particularly struck on visiting the first dam I had ever seen, which is the largest dam of the district, measuring no less than six hundred and fifty feet in length, and three and one half feet in height, with the small number of lodges in the vicinity of the _pond. It seemed impossible that such an enormous structure could have been built by the limited number of families which the lodges would shelter. On examining other dams in more inaccessible places, the same was found to be the case, the number of lodges is small, the greatest number I have observed being five upon one pond. It was evident from this that we possessed erroneous notions of the gregarious nature of beavers, that they do not build their dwellings crowded together like huts of working men round a mill, and do not work together in great numbers, accomplishing the task of building their dams in a short time; on the contrary it became evident that their structures—their dams, their canals—are the work of a com- paratively small number cf animals, but to make up for the number, the work of the succeeding inhabitants of any one pond must have been carried on for centuries to accomplish the gigantic results we find in some localities. This fallacy of our knowledge of the beavers was first made public by Mr. L. H. Morgan, who, in his work on the American beaver, which appeared during the last part of my stay at Lake Superior, has given us a most capital history of the habits of the beaver. 1 can only corroborate the truthfulness of his descrip- tions by their perfect application to what I had seen of the beavers in the district which I] examined, and state that I had arrived inde- pendently at many of the conclusions which he has drawn from his prolonged study, extending through twelve summers; it is refresh- ing in these days of works filled with descriptions of species, to turn to a monograph which reminds us of the times when the life history of a single animal and the study of their habits was not considered beneath the labors of a Huber or a Reaumur. Agassiz. | 102 [June 16, Morgan, in the work just quoted, after showing that the dams are the work of a comparatively small number of beavers, naturally also comes to the conclusion that they must be of great age from the amount of solid material they contain, from the destruction of the primitive forests within the area of the ponds, and other causes from which he concludes that these dams have existed in the same places for hundreds and thousands of years, and have been maintained by a system of continuous repairs.. In building an artificial dam across a beaver meadow, I came acci- dentally upon data showing that Morgan’s view of the antiquity of beaver dams is correct. For the purpose of obtaining a secure founda- tion for a mill dam (erected at a short distance above a beaver dam), it became necessary to clear away the soil of the bottom of the beaver pond, which had been exposed by cutting the beaver dam. below it. This soil was found to be a peat bog of variable depth, attaining a thickness of six feet. A belt of this peat, twelve feet wide and some- what over twelve hundred feet long, was removed, and imbedded in the peat below the surface peat of the bottom of the pond were found the traces of a number of stumps in various stages of decompo- sition, and here and there what looked like beaver cuttings, and finally the workmen came across several stumps where the marks of the beavers’ teeth were still plainly visible, showing that the stumps found in the peat were probably all stumps of trees cut by beavers in former times; the bottom of this peat bog was two and one half feet above the base of the beaver dam. We have here positive evidence that in this case, at least, the peat bog was formed by the pond flowed by the dam, and the same state of things exists in several other dams which I examined. We find that they are always accompanied by larger or smaller peat bogs, all of which, as in the case above alluded to, owe their existence to the beaver dams. On sounding them, the depth of one of them was found to be as great as nine feet. In these instances careful levels were run from the dam towards the source of the creek upon which they are built, and on reconstructing the appearance of the country, as it must have been before the beaver dams existed, I found that from the nature of the surrounding country, the open spaces now joining the beaver ponds, the beaver meadows where the trees are scanty or small, must at one time have all been covered by forests similar to those which are found on the banks, and fully as luxuriant. It was only when the beavers established themselves upon the creek 1849 ] 1 0 3) [Agassiz and commenced to build their dams that they began to clear the forest just in the immediate vicinity of the dams extending in every direction, first up the stream as far as the nature of the creek would allow, and then laterally by means of their canals, as far as the level of the ground would allow, thus little by little clearing a larger area, according to the time they have occupied any particular place. Soon after the commencement of their dams, usually selected on such a spot of the creek as is sluggish, and where a slight elevation will give a large area for flowage, the ground must have become saturated with moisture, rank grass must have started up. Sphagnum soon made its appearance, and little by little, as the dam was raised, the area extended, and the marshy meadow prepared the ground for the ulti- mate formation of the peat beds observed, which extended little by little as far as the possibility of the ground would allow, covering by decrees the base of the stumps of the trees cut by the beavers, as well as of the bushes, covering the sticks left about with a coating of grass and peat, and either decomposing or preserving, as was the case in the peat bog observed, the stumps which are to tell us now how long they have been occupied in raising their dams. The rapidity with which peat is deposited varies greatly in some districts of Switzerland, according to Lesquereux, to whose kindness I am indebted for the needed figures, taken from the exploration he conducted so successfully in various parts of Europe to ascertain the nature and growth of peat bogs. We find localities where at a fixed date no bogs existed, and after a lapse of fifty years had grown one and one half feet, so that we can take as a general thing a growth of about one foot in a century as the average, though the rate of growth varies according to localities, three feet in a hundred years having been observed, the lacustrine deposits growing at a much slower rate than the peat bog deposited in mountainous districts. So that in the vase of bogs of the depth of nine feet, we can safely assume that the probable age of the dam is about nine hundred years, which would give a rational explanation of the possibility of building such huge structures by such small number of animals as are evidently the dwellers on the shores of the beaver pond of any one dam. New dams are started, as stated by Morgan, by a pair of young beavers, and I find that considerable exploration of localities suited for new structures is made by beavers during the winter, when the crust of the snow % suitable, and their trails have been found at a distance of two ant one half miles from the nearest dams, prospecting Agassiz. | 104 [June 16, for a site where they were invariably at work the following spring, commencing these dams in some cases where their dams were dis- turbed in winter, they would migrate bodily and establish themselves on the shores of a more isolated creek. They inyariably build burrows when first starting their dams, and when the ground of the bank is not propitious they continue to dwell in them and do not build lodges, as was the case in a mud dam built across a rather steep valley where the flowage simply gave depth near the dam, and at a considerable distance from it, only spreading into a shallow sheet at too great a distance from the dam, evidently, to make that mode of inhabitation available. The extent of the denudations of forests, thus artificially produced by the beavers, is quite extensive; the areas of some of these beaver clearings are very large. I have seen ponds of an extent of no less than forty acres, as the direct result of the backing water of a beaver dam, and beaver meadows of two to three hundred acres in area are by no means uncommon. When beaver dams are placed one below _the other, as is frequently the case, the extent of country thus opened and cleared of forests by them may cover the large portion of several sections of land, changing into open swamp lands extensive tracts, which at one time must have been dry, and covered with dense forests. This interference of beaver dams is also frequently the cause of accumulations of water on ridges, from which the natural water sheds are altered. From talking with intelligent trappers who have hunted in the lands of the Hudson Bay Company, I learn that the works of the beavers are so extensive there in some localities, that they have played a not unimportant part in changing the whole aspect of large tracts of the country, and covering with water a great extent of country which was once thickly wooded. On THE HABITS OF A FEW ECHINODERMS. By ALEX. AGASSIZ. In the various reports of animals found at great depths in the ocean, the presence of staryishes attached to the rope at a considera- ble distance from the dredging or sounding apparatus, has been instanced as proving beyond doubt that they lived at great depths, and that the rope was dragging along the bottom, as their specific gravity was so much greater than that of the water that when placed in it they immediately sank. My object is simply to record a few notes of what I have observed on the seacoast at various times with refer- 1869.] 105 [ Agassiz. ence to this point, but I wish at the same time to be distinctly under- stood as not denying on this account the fact of the existence of these animals at great depths, but simply to show how cautious we should be in making broad generalizations from the presence of a few animals at any one point, the habits of which we know nothing about. Carpenter, in his report’ on the deep sea dredging of the English Expedition of 1868, mentioned an Astropecten as attached at a dis- tance of two hundred and fifty fathoms from the dredge, twelve hun- dred fathoms being out. Ross, while sounding at a depth of one thousand fathoms, found on the sounding line at a depth of eight hundred fathoms, a species of Euryale, and again while sounding at a depth of one thousand fifty fathoms, below the point marked eight hundred fathoms, a small starfish was found attached to the sounding line. Carpenter and Wallich both saying that “it is irreconcilable with what we know of the habits and structure of the Echinoderms, to suppose that the Caput Medusz (Euryale) and small starfishes referred to could have been found free, floating and alive, at a distance of two hundred fathoms from the bottom.” Carpenter says of the Astropecten,? “As this animal is entirely unfurnished with swimming organs, and was found to be of such specific gravity as to sink immediately when placed in a jar of seawater, it can scarcely be taken up anywhere else than from the sea bottom.”’ Any one who has ever kept starfishes alive in a tank, cannot fail to have observed the tendency they have to creep up along the sides of the tank till the foremost arms reach the top of the water. They then continue to creep on, the anterior arms, however, not protruding out of the water, but turning over, spread with the suckers uppermost, extended to the fullest extent. This is carried so far that the starfish are frequently attached to the side of the jar or tank, only by a very small portion of the extremity of one arm, where the suckers are least powerful, and a portion by far too small to form a fulcrum for the upholding of the rest of the starfish in that attitude. If we ex- amine the starfish (Asteracanthion berylinus) in that attitude, we shall find also that the body is by no means rigid, on the contrary the 1Wallich, G.C. The North Atlantic Sea Bed. London, 1862, p. 80. 2Carpenter, Dr. W. B. “ Preliminary Report of Dredging Operations in the Seas to the North of the British Islands, carried on in her Majesty’s steam vessel Lightning,” by Dr. Carpenter and Dr. Wyville Thompson. From Proc. of Royal Soc. No. 107, 1868, p, 171. A gassiz.] 106 [June 16, whole abactinal area is expanded to its fullest amount, the arms and interradial part swelling out immensely, become quite flaccid, and the specific gravity of the starfish must, by the amount of water which it has thus taken in, be very nearly equal to that of water. This operation I have repeatedly seen performed by starfishes, measuring five or six inches across the arms, and when the starfishes are young they frequently lose their hold, and float about on the surface of the water. Starfishes measuring two and one half and three inches across the arms, are able to float in this manner, and while fishing with the scoop net on the surface of the water for pelagic animals, hardly a single expedition goes by without finding one or two young starfishes, ranging from one eighth of an inch to one and one half inch across the arms swimming freely about. This is not limited to our two species of Asteracanthion. I have observed the same thing in the adult of our common Cribrella when kept in confinement, and young measuring three fourths of an inch across the arms, are fre- quently found swimming about. I had already in’ 1864? called atten- tion to the fact that young Sea-urchins, measuring somewhat less than one fifteenth of an inch in diameter, could be found with the scoop net swimming on the surface, and that the young of our Ophiurans, young Ophiopholis having already five joints on each arm, long after they have lost their plutean appendages, have the same habit of floating at will on the surface by expanding to their fullest extent. The same applies to young Cuvieria one half inch in length. I have never observed any such capacity in the older Ophiurans or Cuvieria. But there is an- other Echinoderm which, in the adult condition, is capable of a kind of swimming, that is the Euryale. In my work on Radiates of Mas- sachusetts Bay, I gave a sketch of an Euryale? in its natural attitude standing on tip toe, as it were, with its disk swelling to the fullest capacity, thus supporting the whole weight upon comparatively small numbers of the slenderest joints of the extremity of the arms, showing how nearly equal to the specific gravity of the water it must be, so that by slightly pushing it and producing a current, it will actually float, and then slowly settle again to the bottom. This will account for the frequency with which our fishermen bring up Astrophyton on their 1 Agassiz, A. On the Embryology of Echinoderms. From Mem. Am. Acad. IX, p. 9. 2 Seaside studies in Natural History. Fig, 151, p. 118. Boston, 1865. Marine Animals of Massachusetts Bay. Radiates. By El. and Alex. Agassiz. 1869.] 107 [Agassiz, lines; they meet them floating about a short distance above the bot- tom of the sea. The Astrophyton is not as sensitive to disturbance as the starfishes are ; hence in the same experiment made with a star- fish, the animal would be more likely to sink if disturbed when expanded. The solid limestone shell of these Echinoderms is not so solid at it looks; a section made across the plates of an Nchinus, of an Ophiuran or starfish, still reveals to us the original mode of building up of this limestone structure, so apparent in the younger stage of the Echinoderms, which is nothing but a system of net work of lime- stone meshes, becoming closer and closer as the animal grows older; and still leave, even in the adult, an immense area for the absorp- tion of the water which all these animals are able to draw into their cavities, and must permeate all their interstices, thus equalizing the . pressure to which they must be subject at great depth, by thus pene- trating everywhere, and permeating every part of their frame. The large percentage of water which starfishes and sea-urchins are capable of taking into their cavity, is shown by the following figures, made up by weighing fully expanded Echinoderms which have been in water a considerable time, and then weighing them again after they had been exposed to the air, but without allowing them to dry. The average loss of thirty-three specimens of various sizes of Asteracanthion berylinus Ag., weighed as mentioned above, was .795 due to the water which the specimens lost when exposed to the air. The average loss of seventeen specimens of A. pallidus Ag., was .815. The greater loss in this species is due to the greater flexibility and extensibility of the abactinal area than in the preceding species. The average loss of eight specimens of Toxopneustes drobachiensis Ag., was .554. When we come to other classes, such as the Acalephe, the loss of -water is still greater, being, on the average for our large Aurelia flavidula Ag., no less than .997, so that the jelly fishes seem nearly to be in the condition most favorable to resist great pressure, that of a spheroidal shell with an infinitely thin envelope suspended in the water at any depth it may be placed. Stearns. ] 108 [October 6, October 6, 1869. The President in the chair. Forty-one members present. Professor Spencer F. Baird, of Washington, D. C., was elected an Honorary Member. Professor John Capellini, of Bologna, Col. E. B. Carling, U.S. A. and Mr. T. W. Higginson, of Newport, R. L, were elected Corresponding Members. The following gentlemen were elected Resident Members : Messrs. Charles Deane, Ruthven Deane, Edward Rawson and William Brewster, of Cambridge; Professor Ferdinand Bocher, Dr. G. H. Bixby and Messrs. E. 8.*Tobey and P. 8. Tobey of Boston. The President read by title a paper on the Osteology and Myology of Didelphys virginiana, by Elliott Coues; with an appendix on the Brain, by Jeffries Wyman; this will be printed in full in the Memoirs. The following papers were also presented : — On a NEw Species OF PEDIPES FROM TAMPA Bay, FLoRIDA. By Rosert E. C. STEARNS. Pedipes naticoides Stearns. Shell resembling a tiny Natica; imperforate, globose, translucent, pale horn color; spire short, apex obtuse; whorls four to four and a half, slightly flat- tened above; the upper whorls moderately elevatéd; body whorl nine tenths the length of the shell; suture strongly defined; surface ornamented with fine de- pressed revolving lines, crossed obliquely and regu- larly by sharply developed lines of growth; aperture longitudinal, suboval; the middle portion of the outer lip moderately tuberculately thickened within, and slightly pressed inwards, giving a somewhat angular outline to the upper part of its edge; parietal wall covered with shining callus and furnished internally with a strongly developed ridge or plait, which culminates in a prominent sub-acute tooth, projecting in the line of its obliquity 1869.) 109 (Perkins. two fifths of the width of the aperture; columella showing two rather obtuse teeth or folds, the upper being the largest, with a sinuous suleation at their bases, parallel to the outline of the columella, causing, together with the folds, an appearance resembling the thread of a screw, or the plaits in Cancellaria. Length .11 inch. Breadth .06 inch. Habitat: Littoral zone, Rocky point, Tampa Bay, western shore of Florida; found with other small species of mollusks upon the un- der side of clumps of “Coon oysters” at low water line. Two speci- mens, living, one adult, the other not quite developed. This well marked species is the first of the genus found upon the eastern side of the Continent, and the fourth thus far detected in North America. The late Prof. C. B. Adams obtained a species at Panama, P. an- gulatus, Mr. W. G. Binney described another, P. lirata, from Cape St. Lucas, and Dr. J. G. Cooper a third, P. unisulcata, from San Pedro, California; the species above described is more globose, and more delicate than either of the others. For the excellent figure of P. naticoides I am indebted to the kindness of my friend, Mr. E. S. Morse. Moriuscan Fauna oF NEw Haven. A CRITICAL REVIEW OF ALL THE MARINE, FRESH WATER AND LAND MoLuusca OF THE REGION, WITH DESCRIPTIONS OF MANY OF THE LIVING ANIMALS AND OF TWO NEW SPECIES. Part I. CEPHALOPODA AND GASTEROPODA. By Grorce H. Perxins, Pu.D. New Haven Bay, in and about which most of the marine species ‘mentioned in the following pages were collected, is an arm of Long Island Sound, nearly five miles long and, at the entrance, three broad. Near the shore the water is shallow, and nowhere is the depth, at low tide, more than three fathoms. The average depth over the whole area is less than two fathoms. Three small rivers, emptying into the bay, freshen the water and fill it with mud, which covers most of the bottom, and even where that is sandy there is more or less mud mingled with the sand. Near the lighthouse, at the entrance of the bay, on the eastern side, and for a mile northerly, a low ridge runs near the water’s edge, and on the western side, nearly opposite the lhghthouse, are a few masses of rock of no great extent, which are together often Perkins. ] 110 (October 6, called Savin Rock, though the name belongs properly to the largest only. Everywhere else the shores are low, sandy and faced by broad mud flats. A few of the species were collected in the some- what clearer and deeper water of the Sound, outside the bay. On account of the freshness and impurity of the water, many species are less brightly and beautifully colored, and smaller than in more favor- able localities. Some genera, as Pecten, Ensatella and Hemimactra, which are very abundant north or south, are relatively uncommon and small, while others, as Macoma, grow very large. Deep water species are necessarily either wholly wanting, or occur only as dead shells thrown upon the beach by storms. ‘The fauna of the region belongs about equally to the Acadian and Virginian faune. Of the marine species enumerated, fifty occur north of Cape Cod, thirteen Dr. Packard reports from Labrador, eight are found in Greenland, according to Dr. Morch, and eight are European. Fifty- one extend as far south as South Carolina, and some still farther. Thirty-seven are found in the Post Pliocene, twenty-six in the Plio- cene, and nineteen in the Miocene. Of the sixty-five species found in the Sound, but not, as yet, in New Haven Bay, forty-nine are found north of Cape Cod, and nine on the Carolina shores, while others range both north and south. The descriptions of the animals, and all measurements, are from living specimens, and the various parts are taken in their natural position. In bivalves the length is regarded as the distance from the siphonal end to the opposite. In nomenclature the rules of the British Association are followed. The list of marine species embraces all that have hitherto been found in this place, and is the result of a careful examination of the whole region. It has been impracticable at this time to give as thorough: study to the land and fresh water shells, though the list is believed to be tolerably complete. The sandy soil, trap and sandstone rocks of the region are not favorable to the growth of land shells. I am happy to express my sincere thanks to Professor A. EK. Verrill for granting free use of the Yale College collection, for freely giving his personal assistance at all times, and for identifying the Polyzoa. I am also indebted to Dr. E. T. Nelson and Mr. H. 8. Williams for the use of their collections. The following works are referred to in the Synonymy :— Systema Nature. Linné. 12thed. 1767. Animaux sans Vertebres. Lamarck. 12th ed. Paris, 1843. 1869.} 111 (Perkins, Invertebrata of Massachusetts. Gould. Cambridge, Mass., 1841. Say’s American Conchology, Binney’s edition. New York, 1859. Natural History of New York. Zoology. Part I, Mollusca. De Kay. Albany, 1843. Genera of Recent Mollusca. H. &. A. Adams. London, 1858. Monograph of the Limniades and other Fresh Water Univalve Shells of North America. Haldeman. Philadelphia, 1844. Land and Fresh Water Shells of North America. W. G. Binney. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, 1865. Parts II and III. Teconographie des Coquilles Vivantes. Kiener. Paris, (no date). Manuel de Conchyliologie. Chenu. Paris, 1859. Revision of the Synonymy of the Testaceous Mollusks of New England, ete. Stimpson. Boston, 1851. Check List of the Shells of North America. (Kast Coast). Stimp- son. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, 1860. Monograph of the American Corbiculidse. Prime. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, 1865. Manual of the Mollusca. Woodward. london, 1866. Boston Journal of Natural History. 1834-1863. Proceedings of the Boston Society of Natural History. Vol. rv, 1851. Journal of the Portland Society of Natural History. Vol. 1, 1864. American Naturalist. Vol.1. Salem, Mass., 1867. American Journal of Conchology. Vol.1. Philadelphia, 1865. American Journal of Science and Arts. New Haven, Ct. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. Annals of the Lyceum of Natural History. Vol. vu. New York, 1859. ‘ CEPHALOPODA. Louigo Lamarck, 1799. Loligo punctata De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 3, pl. i, fig. 1. This is taken at times in considerable quantity in seines set near the entrance of the harbor, but it has, so far as I know, never been found on the shore. The egg clusters are occasionally found on the beach in June. They consist of a mass of long, cylindrical, jelly- like bodies, transparent and colorless, in which the oval, white ova Perkins.] 1D [October 6, are imbedded. These are regularly arranged in longitudinal rows, there being usually six rows. The cases are fastened at one end, and taper from the free end till near the point of attachment, where they suddenly become quite small. There is a slight elevation of the surface over each ovum. The length is quite variable, average spec- imens being from 72 miil. to 95 mill. long. The diameter is about 6 mill. The ova are 2 mill. long and 1.2 mill. broad. Rarely the cases are attached at both ends. GAS TEROP (iA: MURICIDZ. Urosapinx Stimpson, 1865. Urosalpinx cinereus Stimpson, Am. Journ. Conch., Vol. 1, pt. 1, p. 58, pl. vill, figs. 6, 7. Fusus cinereus Say, Am. Conch., pp- 79, 184, pl. xxix, 1831; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 145, pl. viii, fig. 184. Lapana? cinerea Stimpson’s Check List. Buccinum plico- sum Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 303, fig. 213. Very abundant, especially on rocks near low water. Animal light yellow; tentacles short; eyes on outer side, about half way between the base and tip; foot rounded and notched behind, straight in front; operculum thin, corneous, ovate, chestnut brown. Teeth 1-1-1; lateral teeth simple, not much curved; median tooth broad, with three large denticles in the centre and several small ones each side. ‘ MEASUREMENTS. Length of shell 24.6 mill. Breadth 15 mill. ly operculum 84 “ 4.4 bh foot 144 % ee 8.6 (before), 6.8 (behind). UG tentacles yeh The ova capsules are attached in clusters to rocks, shells, ete., near low water; they are ovate, with short peduncle, broadest above, with the aperture in the centre of the upper margin; they are much flattened, arcuate, with a ridge running down each side; color, very light yellow. Ova 10-20, yellow; deposited in June. Height 6.4 miil.; greatest breadth 4 mill.; diameter 1.4 mill.; aperture 1.6 mill. 1869.] 113 (Perkins, EupetEurA H. & A. Adams, 1853. Eupleura caudata H. & A. Adams, Gen. Rec. Moll., Vol. 1, p: 107; Stimpson, Am. Journ. Conch., Vol. 1, p. 58, pl. viii, fig. 5, 1865. Ranella caudata Say, Am. Conch., pp. 80, 200, pl. xlvin, 1822; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 298, fig. cciv ; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p- 139, pl. viii, fig. 176. Triton caudata Kien., Icon., pt. m1, p. 6, pl. ix, fig. 2. Not common. JLaminarian, sometimes Littoral. I have found it alive several times, but have not seen it extended. The operculum is dark brown, ovate, strongly marked by concentric lines of growth; lingual ribbon long, narrow. Teeth 1-1-1; lateral teeth simple, curved; median tooth with three stout denticles and smaller ones each side. COLUMBELLIDZ. Anacuis H. & A. Adams, 1853. Anachis avara. Columbella avara Say, Am. Conch., p. 76, 1822; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 313, fig. 197; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 139, pl. vin, fig. 179. Occurs rarely alive, but dead shells are not very uncommon on the beach. A long, slender variety, with eight whorls, is sometimes found. The Messrs. Adams refer this shell to Amycla, as I think, wrongly. Amycita H. & A. Adams, 1853. Amycla lunata. Nassa lunata Say, Am. Conch., p. 122, 1826. Buccinum lunatum Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 312, fig. 196; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 131, pl. vii, fig. 162. Often found alive under stones, and on sea weeds at extreme low water, and dead in sand on the shore. Amycla Gouldiana. Columbella Gouldiana Agassiz, Mss.; Stimp- son, Shells of N. E., p. 47, 1851. Occurs rarely with the preceding; of which it is probably only a variety. Amycla dissimilis. Columbeila dissimilis Stimps., Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. rv, p. 114, 1851; do. Shells of N. E., p. 47, 1851. I discovered three fine specimens of this Northern species in a lot of Amycla lunata. PROGEEDINGS B. 8. N. H.—VOL. XIII. 8 NOVEMBER, 1869. Perkins.} 114 [October 6, BUCCINIDZ. FurteGur Mont. Fulgur carica Gill, Am. Jour. Conch., Vol. 111, p. 145. Murex carica Linn., Gmel., 3545. Pyrula carica Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 296; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 141, pl. ix, figs. 192-193. This species is not common usually on shore, but sometimes it is abundant. It occupies the Laminarian zone, and most abounds near oyster beds, where it commits great ravages. Animal, large, dirty white to almost black; mantle thick, white, edge plain; proboscis long, cylindrical, slightly bilobed and black, or nearly so at the end, lighter next the body; tentacles short, triangular; eyes on the outer side near the base; gills two; one large, crescent-shaped, and below, and a little in front, one much smaller, curved, fusiform, grooved through the centre; the larger gill is narrower and thicker behind than before; foot large, oval, yellow below, blackish above, under surface much corrugated; verge very large and long, much flattened, pointed. Dentition 1-1-1; lateral teeth with a sharp curved outer denticle, then three shorter and more slender, and an inner stout triangular denticle; median tooth with 4-5 sharp conical denticles; the number of denticles varies in the same sex and even on the same ribbon at opposite ends. The operculum is ovate, thick, with a broad callus around the inner edge, which is heaviest on the left side; outer surface coarse and rough; color greenish yellow. The ova cases of this species consist of a series of membranous disks attached to a connecting cord of the same substance, forming a string; these strings are quite long, tapering somewhat at the ends; the disks are thin on the edge (the general thickness is about five mill.), broadly ovate, with eleven ribs, which radiate from the at- tached side and scallop the edge; opening opposite the point of attachment}; color light yellow; filled with a colorless, thick, albumi- nous substance, in which float about sixty young. In a string forty- two centimetres long, there were seventy-five disks, whose average size was thirty-two mill. broad by twenty-two long. They are most common in March and April. MEASUREMENTS. Length of shell, ¢ 122 mill. Breadth 62 mill. body 168) 45 te large gill 386 CS 2 9. & & small ‘ ISAS g 3.4 ‘ proboscis 20 aes = lingual ribbon 40 * 4 Os ts téntadles 1g * at 4 “at base. 1869.] 115 (Perkins, Sycotypus Browne, 1846. Sycotypus canaliculatus Gill, Am. Journ. Conch., Vol. 111, p- 147. Murex canaliculatus Linn., Syst. Nat., 1222. Busycon canaliculatum Stimps., Smith. Check List. Pyrula canaliculata Lam., An. sans Vert., Vol. x, p. 504; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 294, fig. 206 ; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 140, pl. ix, fig. 190. Common in the same localities as the preceding. It is not usually large, varies in color from light buff to dark, livid purple, and is not infrequently distorted; mantle white, edged with a narrow granulous cord of bright yellow color; proboscis long, black at the tip, reddish near the body, with a small fold just above the tip on one side; ten- tacles short, triangular, usually the right is much the smaller; eye spots on outer side about half way from the tips; foot large, ovate ; operculum irregularly oval, thin, semitransparent, unless in a very old specimen, marked by strong lines of growth, brown, sometimes greenish; lingual ribbon Jong. Teeth 1-1-1; median tooth with three equal, slender, conical denticles; lateral teeth with a stout, much curved denticle on the outside, having on its inner base a small, sharp tubercle ; next is a short, simple denticle, inside of which is one longer and broader, bifid at its tip, and inside a sharp, much curved one, bearing a sharp curved tubercle on its outer edge. Thus we have four denticles with seven points. Some of the tubercles are occasionally wanting. The ova cases of this species are similar to those of the preceding, but. are smaller and do not have a sharp, edge, but a narrow partition separates the surfaces. The surface is smooth, but the edge is crossed by twelve to fifteen ribs. ) LO. ; Very rare. 1869.) 121 [Perkins. Cdostomia trifida Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 274, fig. 179; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 114, pl. viii, fig. 178. Actwon trifidus Totten, Am. Journ. Sci., Vol. xxvi, p. 368, pl. i, fig. 4. This species is more common than any of the others. It occurs under stonesand among alee near low water. The animal is very similar to that of O. eras TURBONILLA Risso, 1826. ‘Turbonilla interrupta Stimps., Check List. Turritella inter- rupta Totten, Am. Journ. Sci., Vol. xxvit1, p. 352; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 268, fig. 173; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 112, pl. vi, fig. 123. Rare. Occurs under stones at the Lighthouse and Savin Rock, near low water. Turbonilla nivea Stimps., Check List. Chemnitzia nivea Stimps., Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. rv, p. 114, 1851. Only three or four dead specimens were found. PLEUROTOMID. | PLEUROTOMA Lam., 1799. Pleurotoma cerinum Kurtz & Stimps., Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. rv, p. 115; Stimps., Shells of N. E., p. 49, pl. ii, fig. 2. Only four or five specimens of this species have been eon —al of them dead. Pleurotoma brunnea nobis. Pleurotoma plicata C. B. Adams, Bost. Journ. Nat. Hist., Vol. 111, p. 318, pl. iii, fig. 6; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 282, fig. 187; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 150, pl. iv, fig. 120. I have found only one specimen of this shell; this was in a pile of shells thrown up by the waves. As Prof. Adams’ name is preoccu- pied by Lamarck (see An. sans Vert., 12th ed., Vol. rx, p. 371), I propose that given above. TEREBRID&. Hastunta H. & A. Adams, 1853. One rather worn specimen was found by Prof. Verrill, which I refer to this genus. It seems to be new, but is not so perfect as to warrant a description. Perkins.] £22 [October 6, OVULIDZ. SimnrA H. & A. Adams, 1853. Simnia uniplicatula Adams, Gen. Rec. Moll., Vol. 1, p. 373. Volva uniplicatula Chenu, Man. Conch., Vol. 1, p. 273, fig. 1802, et al. auct. Dr. Nelson found a single specimen of this shell, which was proba- bly breught on southern oysters, or in ballast. CALYPTRAIDZ. CREPIDULA Lam., 1799. Crepidula convexa Say, Am. Conch., p. 75, 1822; Gould, In- vert. Mass., p. 160; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 158, pl. vii, fig. 131. Littoral and Laminarian. Abundant, especially on Ilyanassa obso- leta. Animal dusky; rostrum nearly as long as the tentacles, which are short, cylindrical, tapering, bearing the eyes on the outer base; foot round behind, auricled before, longitudinally creased. This species is much more active than the two others. MEASUREMENTS. Length of shell 11.6 mill. Breadth 7.4 mill. f4 foot 7 cc 73 4 “ tentacles 3 “ “of rostrum 1.6 mill. Crepidula fornicata Lam., An. sans Vert., Vol. vu, p. 641; Say, Am. Conch., p. 73, 1822; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 158, fig. 17; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 157, pl. vil, figs. 152 and 154. Patella forni- cata Linné, Syst. Nat., 1257. Very common, varying greatly in form and color in different sta- tions. It occupies the same zone with the preceding. Animal usually white; mantle dark, edged with a simple yellow cord; rostrum deeply bilobed, lobes round, yellow; tentacles blunt at the ends, short, eyes on the outer base; foot broadly oval, dark on the edge, round behind; in front bearing a long curved auricle on each side; lincual ribbon short and broad. Teeth 3-1-3; median tooth with a central triangular denticle and a smaller one each side, the edges of which are finely serrate; inner lateral tooth broad at the end, and serrate with numerous small denticles; outer teeth simple, long, curved. 1869.] $23 | [Perkins. MEASUREMENTS. Length of shell 28.8 mill. Breadth 26 mill. Height 19 mill. % foot 21 bi a 19-7) * “ tentacles se ae lobes of head pe a ce 2. $8 : branchial plume 22.6 ‘“ Branchial plume covered by the mantle, dark brown. The eggs are laid m May. ‘The ova cases are attached in a rosette-like cluster of about thirty, by long slender filaments. The capsules are triangular, thick, colorless, about two thirds filled with minute yellow ova. Length four and one-fifth mill.; breadth four mill.; thickness two and four-fifths mill. Peduncle four mill. long. Crepidula unguiformis Lam., An. sans Vert., Vol. vm, p. 643. Crepidula plana Say, Am. Conch., p. 74, pl. xliv, 1822; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 159, fig. 76; De Kay, Moll.«N. Y., p. 158, pl. vii, fic. 153. - Very common, often completely lining old shells, and also on the outside. I have taken nearly two hundred from a single shell of Fulgur. The young are usually found on the older ones. The lack of convexity is very constant. Animal white; rostrum short, broad, bilobed; tentacles short, obtusely pointed, semitransparent, white at the tips; foot ovate, a little more than half as long as the shell, con- cave before, auricled, round behind; ova capsules in clusters like the preceding; capsules broadly triangular, thin, transparent, about forty in each cluster; ova light yellow, clustered about the upper edge and along the sides, leaving the centre free, and usually the lower part. Length two and one-fifth mill.; breadth three mill.; thickness one and one-fifth mill. Length of peduncle four and three-fifths mill. These capsules are similar to those of C. fornicata, but are broader, shorter, and thinner, and the ova are differently situated. Laid in June. RISSOIDA. Sub-Family Risso1n‘z Stimps., 1865. Rissoa Fleming, 1814. Rissoa aculeus Stimps., Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. rv, p. 15. Cingula aculeus Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 266, fig. 172; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 110, pl. vi, fig. 115. Common under stones and on alge near low water. Perkins.] 124 [October 6, Rissca minuta Stimps., Shells of N. E., p. 33. Turbo minuia Totten, Am. Journ. Sci., Vol. xxv1, p. 369. Cingula minuta Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 265, fig. 171; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 110, pl. iv, fic. 117. Very common in a few limited localities. Rissoella? eburnea Stimps., Check List. Rissoa eburnea Stimps., Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. 1v, p. 14; do. Shells of N. Ep. 34, pls, ae. de Not common. CrveuLa Flem. Cingula levis De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 111, pl. vi, fig. 118. Quite common. Sub-Family SKENEIN & Stimps., 1865. Skenea planorbis Forb. and Han., Brit. Moll.; Stimps., Shells of N. E., p. 35. Skenea serpuloides Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 247, fig. 189; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 117, pl. xxxii, fig. 303. Littoral, occurring with Alexia myosotis. Not common. Sub-Family HyDROBIIN& Stimps., 1865. AMNICOLA Gould & Hald., 1839. Amnicola limosa Hald., Monog., p. 10, pl. i, figs. 5 and 6, 1844; W. G. Binney, Shellsof N. A., pt. m1, p. 84, fig. 166. Paludina porata Say, Am. Conch., p. 61, 1819. Amnicola porata Gould, In- vert. Mass., p. 229, fig. 157. Not common. It occurs in West River and Harris’ pond, near New Haven. Amnicola porata Hald., Monog., p. 13, pl. i, fig. 8; W. G. Bin- ney, Shells of N. A., pt. m1, p. 83, fig. 164; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p: 88, pl. xxxv, fig. 33. Paludina porata Say, Am. Conch., p. 69, 1821. More common than the preceding. Occurs in the same localities. Sub-Family PoMATIOPSIN& Stimps., 1865. PoMATIOPSIS. Pomatiopsis lapidaria Tryon, Proc. Phil. Acad., 1862; W. G. Binney, Shells of N. A., pt. m1, p. 98, fiz. 188; Hald., Monog., p.- 18, pl. i, fig. 10 Paludina lapidaria Say, Am. Conch., p. 56, 1819. Rare. Only a very few specimens found. 1869.] 425 [Perkins. LITTORINIDZ:. LiTToRInA Ferussac, 1821. Littorina palliata De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 106, pl. vi, fig. 10. Turbo palliatus Say, Am. Conch., p. 82, 1822. Littorina littoralis (Forbes & Han.) Stimps., Shells of N. E., p. 33. Littoral, common on stones near low water, and on alge. Animal varying in color from white to black; tentacles usually dark, rarely light, tapering, broad ; eyes on their outer bases; foot oval or round; operculum thin, oval, with concentric lines of growth. The animal is very active, the tentacles are constantly in motion, and the pulsa- tions in the head plainly visible. MEASUREMENTS. Length of shell 6 mill. Breadth 8 mill. “ foot Oe cul ate ie tentacles 4 “ operculum4 ‘“ e aorrst Littorina rudis Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 257, fig. 165; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 104, pl. v, fig. 103. Turbo rudis Montagu, Test. Brit. Turbo obligatus Say, Am. Conch., p. 82, 1822. Common with the preceding. Animal dark; tentacles slender, pointed, black above, lighter below; eyes on the outer bases; ros- trum black, two thirds as long as the tentacles; foot whitish beneath, dusky above, longitudinally grooved; operculum horny, oval, with spiral lines of growth; lingual ribbon very long and narrow; ova hatched within the animal; young shells flat, with very wide aper- ture, corneous. MEASUREMENTS. Length of shell 10 mill. Breadth 8 mill. ae foot (ices “ S26 ue operculum 4 “ fe Sek: oo s tentacles 3.2 “ Littorina irrorata De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 106, pl. vi, fig. 105. Turbo irroratus Say, Am. Conch., p. 81, 1822. Phasianella suleata Lam. (teste Stimpson ). Not at all common. LACUNIDE. Lacuna Turton, 1827. Lacuna vineta Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 262, fig. 178; De Kay, | Perkins.] 126 [October 6, Moll. N. Y., p. 111, pl. vi, fig. 119. Turbo vinctus Montagu, Test. Brit. Not very common. The fuscous variety is rare. PALUDINIDZ. MELANTHO Bowditch, 1822. Melantho decisa Binney, Shells of N. A., part 3, p. 41, figs. 79-84. Paludina decisa Say, Am. Conch., p. 49, pl. x; Hald., Monog., p- 4, pl. i; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 22, fig. 144. ( Vivipara decisa Gill, Proc. Phil. Acad. Common in all ponds and streams, but small and usually much eroded. VALVATIDZ. VALVATA Gray, 1840. Valvata tricarinata Adams, Am. Journ. Sei., Vol. x1, p. 267; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 125, fig. 156; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 118, pl. vi, fig. 130; Binney, Shells of N. A., pt. 111, p. 9, fig. 13. Valvata unicarinata De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 118, pl. vi, fig. 129. Common in all ponds and streams. Valvata sincera Say, Am. Conch., p. 130, pl. Ixxiv, fig. 11, 1824; Hald., Monog., p. 6, pl. i, figs. 5-10; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 119, pl. vi, figs. 127, 128; Binney, Shells of N. A., pt. 111, p. 12, fig. 17. This species is quite rare. I have found it only in Harris’s pond, a mile and a half west of New Haven. The animal is dark; tentacles slender, sharply pointed, white, with a dark line through the middle; eyes on the inner bases; rostrum short, round at the end; foot oblong, narrow, rounded behind, bilobed before. - CERITHIADZ. Bittium Leach, 1847. ‘ Bittium nigrum Stimps., Check List. Pasithea nigra Totten, Am. Journ. Sci., Vol. xxvi, p. 369, pl. i, fig. 7. Cerithium reticula- tum Totten, Am. Journ. Sci., Vol. xxvii1, p. 352. Cerithium Sayit Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 278, fig. 183; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 128, pl. vui, fig. 167. | 1869.} Lez [Perkins. Common on alge near low water. ull grown shells are much less common than young ones. Animal small, purplish ; rostrum rounded, about half as long as the tentacles, deeply bilobed; tentacles slender, white, banded with dark purple, tapering but little; eyes on short pedicels connate with the outer bases of the tentacles ; foot light be- low, spotted with purple, dark above, long and narrow, obtusely pointed behind, expanded in front; operculum thin, corneous, ovate, with a circular thickened upper part, marked with spiral lines of growth, and a sub-triangular and thinner lower part. MEASUREMENTS. Length of shell 5 mill. Breadth 2 mill. ae tentacles 1.6 “ e foot 3° a operculum1.6 ‘ Bittium Greenii Stimps., Check List. Cerithium Greenii C. B. Adams, Bost. Journ. Nat. Hist., Vol. 11, p. 287, pl. iv, fig. 12; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 279, fig. 184; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 130. Very rare. ACMAIDA. TrEctTuRA Audouin, 1830. Tectura testudinalis Stimps., Check List. Patella testudinalis Mill. Patella amena Say, Am. Conch., p. 73, 1822. Patelloida amena Couthouy, Bost. Journ. Nat. Hist., Vol. 1, p. 171. Patelloida testudinalis De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 162, pl. xix, fig. 196. Loitia testudinalis Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 153, fig. 12. Very rare. J am indebted for the only specimen that I have seen from here to Mr. Geo. Williams. It is much more conical, and the apex farther forward than most of those from farther north. Animal oval, white; mantle not extending beyond the edge of the shell, fringed with rather long, uneven papille, light blue, with a darker line around the edge; rostrum short, rounded; tentacles moderately long, tapering, blunt at the ends, setose along the sides, bluish hya- line white, with an opaque white line through the centre, barred with broad lines of the same, when contracted curved about the rostrum; eyes on the outer bases; branchial plume white, longer than the tentacles, tapering gradually from the base, lamella longest behind the midrib, arcuate; foot ovate, pointed behind, when contracted folded longitudinally upon itself; lingual ribbon long and narrow. Perkins.] 128 [October 6, MEASUREMENTS. Length of sheil 13 mill. Breadth 10 mill. Height 5 mill. 66 foot 9 “ r 6 6c be ‘tentacles 5 ee ec branchial plume 6.2 “ HELICIDZ. Mesopon Rafinesque, 1831. Mesodon albolabris Morse, Journ. Port. Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. 1, p. 8. Helx albolabris Say, Am. Conch., pp. 5, 21, 23, pl. xiii, 1816; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 170, fig. £01; - Moses Am. Nat., Vol. I, pp: 16, 96, pl. 1, fig. 2. Common. STENOTREMA Rafinesque, 1819. Stenotrema monodon Morse, Journ. Port. Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. 1, p. 10. Helix monodon Rackett, Linn. Trans.; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 174, fig. 113; Morse, Am. Nat., Vol. 1, p. 151, figs. 12, 13. Not common. Professor Verrill has collected a few specimens. Stenotrema hirsuta Tryon, Am. Journ. Conch., Vol. m1. Helix hirsuta Say, Am. Conch., pp. 7, 8, 21, 1817; Gould, Invert. Mass., p- 175, fig. 116; Morse, Am. Nat., Vol. 1, p. 151, figs. 14, 15. Common. ANGUISPIRA Morse, 1864. Anguispira alternata Morse, Journ. Port. Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. 1, p. 11. Helix alternata Say, Am. Conch., pp. 6, 21, 31, 1816; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 177, fig. 114; Morse, Am. Nat., Vol. 1, p. 187, figs. 17, 18. Quite rare. Hyarina Agassiz, 1837. Hyalina arborea Morse, Journ. Port. Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. 1, p. 14. Helix arborea Say, Am. Conch., p. 31, 1824; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 182, fig. 110; Morse, Am. Nase Vol. 1, p. 542, fig. 30. Common in camp woods. Hyalina electrina Morse, Journ. Port. Soc. Nat. Hist, Vol. 1, p- 13. Helix electrina Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 183, fig. 111; Morse, Am. Nat., Vol. 1, p. 542, fig. 31. Collected by Prof. Verrill. Quite rare. 1869. 129 (Perkins. PsEUDOHYALINA Morse, 1864. Pseudohyalina exigua Morse, Journ. Port. Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. 1, p.16. Helix exigua Stimps., Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. 11, p. 175; Morse, Am. Nat., Vol. 1, p. 543, fig. 34. Collected at Stony Creek by Prof. Verrill. Fare. Pseudohyalina minuscula Morse, Journ. Port. Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. 1, p. 16. Helix minuscula Binney, Bost. Journ. Nat. Hist., Vol. 111, p. 485; Morse, Am. Nat., Vol. 1, p. 543, fig. 35. Rare. VALLONIA Risso, 1826. Vallonia minuta Morse, Journ. Port. Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. 1, p. 21. Helix minuta Say, Am. Conch., pp. 7, 10, 21, 1817; Morse, Am. Nat., Vol. 1, p. 544, fig. 39. Common about the roots of elms on the College grounds. StrropitA Morse, 1864. Strobila labyrinthica Morse, Journ. Port. Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. 1, p. 26. Helix labyrinthica Say, Am. Conch., pp. 7, 10, 21, 1817; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 184, fig. 106; Morse, Am. Nat., Vol. 1, p- 545, figs. 41, 42. | Hexicopiscus Morse, 1864. Helicodiscus lineata Morse, Journ. Port. Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. I, p. 25. Helix lineata Say, Am. Conch:, pp. 7, 9, 24, 1817; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 179, fig. 103; Morse, Am. Nat., Vol. 1, p. 546, fig. 44. Common under stones in moist woods on West Rock. SuccinEA Drap., 1801. Succinea avara Say, Am. Conch., p. 32, pl. Ixxiv, fig. 6, 1824; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 196, fig. 127; Morse, Am. Nat., Vol. 1, p. 607, fig. 47. ‘ Common in moist places. Succinea ovalis Say, Am. Conch., pp. 7, 8, 22, 1817; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 194, fig. 125; Morse, Am. Nat., Vol. 1, p. 607, fig. 48. Succinea obliqua Say (not Gould), Am. Conch., p. 32. Not uncommon. PROCEHDINGS B. 8. N. H.—VOL. XIII. 9 NOVEMBER, 1869. Perkins.} * 130 [October 6, PUPADZ. LevucocuitAa Alb. and Mart. Leucochila armifera Morse, Am. Nat., Vol. 1, p. 667, fig. 55. Pupa armifera Say, Am. Conch., p. 21, 1821; Gould, Bost. Journ. Nat. Hist., Vol. 1, p. 401. Not common. Leucochila pentodon Morse, Journ. Port. Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. 1, p. 36. Pupa pentodon Morse, Am. Nat., Vol. 1, p. 667, fig. 57; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 50, pl. iv, fig. 48 and pl. xxxvi, fig. 337. Vertigo pentodon Say, Am. Conch., p. 27,1822. Pupa curvidens Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 189, fig. 120. Collected by Prof. Verrill on the College grounds. Common. Istumia Gray, 1821. Isthmia ovata Morse, Journ. Port. Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. 1, p. 38. Vertigo ovata Say, Am. Conch., p. 26, 1822; Morse, Am. Nat., Vol. 1, p. 668, figs. 57, 58. Not common. Isthmia ventricosa Morse, Annals Lyceum Nat. Hist., N. Y., Vol. viir, 1865. Vertigo ventricosa Morse, Am. Nat., Vol. 1, p. 669, figs. 61, 62. Very rare. LIMACIDZ. Limax Lam., 1809. Limax agrestis (Linn.) Binney, Bost. Journ. Nat. Hist., Vol. Iv; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 20, pl. i, fig. 4. Limazx tunicata Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 3. Not rare. Limax campestris Binney, Bost. Journ. Nat. Hist., Vol. 1v; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 22. Common. Limax flavus (Linn.) Binney, Bost. Journ. Nat. Hist., Vol. 1v; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 21, pl. i, fig. 5. Limax variegatus Lam., An. sans Vert., Vol. m1, p. 266. Common in damp places in gardens. 1869.] 131 [Perkins. Arton Ferussac, 1819. : Arion hortensis (Fer.) De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 23; Binney, Bost. Journ. Nat. Hist., Vol. rv, p. 10. Limaz hortensis Lam., An. sans Vert., Vol. vil, p. 719. Not common. AURICULID. Carycuium Miull., 1774. Carychium exiguum Stimps., Check List; Binney, Shells of N. A., pt. 11, p. 6, figs. 5-9; Morse, Am. Nat., Vol. 1, p. 671, fig. 69. Pupa exigua Say, Am. Conch., p. 26, 1822; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 191, fig. 122. Rare. ALEXIA Leach, 1847. Alexia myosotis Drap.; Binney, Shells of N. A., pt. u, p. 4, fies. 2-4; Morse, Am. Nat., Vol. 1, p. 671, fig. 70. Auricula dentic- ulata Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 199, fig. 129; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p- 58, pl.v, fig. 91. Auricula personata Lam., An. sans Vert., Vol. vill, p. 334. Voluta denticulata Montagu, Brit. Test. Very abundant on the stone foundations of the bridge over West River, near West IJaven, and on the piles. Animal white or dusky; rostrum long, broad, bilobed before; tentacles short, broad at the base, obtusely pointed, but I have seen none “bulbous at. the tip ” (vide Binney, loc. cit., p. 5), wrinkled, edge undulated by the wrin- kles, with a black line along the edge; eyes on the inner bases ; foot narrow, oblong, obtusely pointed behind, round before, margin un- dulated. MEASUREMENTS. Length of shell 8.6 mill. Breadth: 3.8 mill. « foot 6 i sy Pai Oe tentacles1.2 “ ¢ 4) "at base. MerExLAmervus Montfort, 1810. Melampus bidentatus Say, Am. Conch., p. 84, 1822; Binney, Shells of N. A., pt. um, p. 10, figs. 11, 12; Morse, Am. Nat., Vol. 1, p- 671, fig. 71. Melampus corneus Stimps., Shells of N. E., p. 51. Melampus lineatus Say, Am. Conch., p. 85, 1822 (var.). Auricula Perkins.] 1isy4 [October 6, bidentata Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 197, fig. 1830; De Kay, Moll. Bp. D4, ,pl. vw, te. wee Very abundant on walls near high water, in salt marshes, on piles of bridges, and other places above low water. It varies greatly in form and color. Animal dark brown or fuscous; tentacles cylindri- cal, a little tapering, not long; eyes on inner bases; foot oblong, rounded and notched behind; edge scalloped slightly, divided into three lobe-like segments; the first narrow, sub-crescent-shaped, notched in front; the second broader, trapezoidal; the third much the largest, straight in front, rounded behind and notched. MEASUREMENTS. Length of shell 8.6 mill. Breadth 4.6 mill. 3 Ist segment of foot .8 “ iO Baa a“ 2d cs “ 1.6 “ “ 4.2 “c “c 8d “c “ 5 “ “ 2, “ nF tentacles 22-9" LIMN AID. Lymnopuysa Fitz., 1833. Lymnophysa desidiosa Morse, Journ. Port. Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. 1, p.41. Lymnea desidiosa Say, Am. Conch., pp. 66, 130, 211, pl. lv; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 219, fig. 150; Hald., Monogr., p. 31, pl. x; Binney, Shells of N. A., pt. m1, p. 48, fig. 68. Common in ponds, especially in a small pond by the roadside near the Lighthouse. Lymnophysa umbrosa Tryon, Am. Journ. Conch., Vol. 11, p. 250. Lymnophysa elodes Morse, Journ. Port. Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. 1, p. 41. Lymneus umbrosa*Say, Am. Conch., p. 168, p]. xxxi; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 68, pl. iv, fig. 76. Lymneus elodes Say, Am. Conch., pp- 66, 188. Lymnea elodes Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 221, figs. 146, 147. Lymneus fragilis De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 68, pl. iv, fig. 76. Lymnea palustris (pars) Binney, Shells of N. A., pt. mW, p. 44, fio. 60. Common in most ponds. I have followed Mr. Tryon in placing the species commonly called L. elodes under L. umbrosa, as that seems to me to be its proper place. 1869.] 133 [Perkins. NerisTtoMa Tryon, 1865. Neristoma columella Tryon, Am. Journ. Conch., Vol. 1, p-. 248. Radix columella Morse, Journ. Port. Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. I, p. 42. Lymneus columellus Say, Am. Conch., p. 65, 1821. Lym- nea columella Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 215, fig. 144; Hald., Monogr., p- 38, pl. xii; do. var. chalybea, Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 216, fig. 145. PLANORBIDZE. PLANORBIS Guet., 1756. Planorbis lentus Say, Am. Conch., p. 210, pl. liv, fig. 1, 1834; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 202, fig. 182; Hald., Monogr., p. 18, pl. iii, fies. 3-6; Binney, Shells of N. A., pt. 1, p. 104, fig. 177. Common everywhere. PLANORBELLA Hald., 1842. Planorbella campanulatus Binney, Shells of N. A., pt. 1, p. 109, fig. 184. Planorbis campanulatus Say, Am. Conch., pp. 129, 164, 1821; Hald., Monogr., p. 9, pl. i, figs. 7-11; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 204, fig. 133. Not common. ~ Menetus H. & A. Adams, 1853. Menetus exacutus Morse, Journ. Port. Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. 1, p- 41; Binney, Shells of N. A., pt. u, p. 126, fig. 210. Planorbis exacutus Say, Am. Conch., p. 64, 1821; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 208, » fig. 1387; Hald., Monogr., p. 21, pl. iv, figs. 1-3. Common in West River and Harris’s Pond. GYRAULUS Agassiz. Gyraulus deflectus Morse, Journ. Port. Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. I, p. 41; Binney, Shells of N. A., pt. 11, p. 129, fig. 215. Planorbis deflectus Say, Am. Conch., p. 128, pl. Ixxiv, fig. 8, 1829; Hald., Mo- “nogr., p. 25, pl. rv, figs. 4-7; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 207, fig. 136; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 65. Not very common. Gyraulus dilatatus Morse., Journ. Port. Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. I, p. 41; Binney, Shells of N. A., pt. u, p. 181, fig. 218. Planorbis Perkins.] 134 [October 6, dilatatus Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 210, fig. 140; Hald., Monogr., p. 23, pl. iv, figs. 15-18; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 66. I have found this nowhere except in a small pond on Whitney Avenue, three quarters of a mile north of the city. Gyraulus hirsutus Morse, Journ. Port. Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. 1, p- 41. Gyraulus albus Binney, Shells of N. A., pt. U1, p. 132, figs. 219-221. Planorbis hirsutus Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 206, fig. 135; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 64. Planorbis albus Hald., Monogr., p. 29, pl. iv, figs. 8-10. Common everywhere. Gyraulus parvus Morse, Journ. Port. Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. 1, p- 41; Binney, Shells of N. A., pt. 11, p. 133, figs. 222-224. Planor- bis parvus Say, Am. Conch., p. 45, pl. Ixxix, fig. 5, 1816; Hald., Monoer., p. 27, pl. iv, figs. 19-23; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 209, fig. 139; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 66. Common everywhere. PLANORBULA Hald., 1842. Planorbula armigera Morse, Journ. Port. Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. I, p. 40; Binney, Shells of N. A., pt. 1, p. 187, fig. 229. Planorbis armigerus Say, Am. Conch., pp. 66, 129, 1821; Hald., Monogr., p. 30, pl. iv, figs. 11-15; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 205, fig. 138; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 62, pl. iv, fig. 64. Not very common. Puysa Drap., 1807. Physa ancillaria Say, Am. Conch., p. 114, 1825; Gould, In- vert. Mass., p. 212, fig. 142; Hald., Monogr., p. 27, pl. ui, figs. 1-10; Binney, Shells of N. A., pt. 1, p. 81, fig. 139. Physa obesa De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 78, pl. v, fig. 86. Not very abundant. Physa heterostropha Say, Am. Conch., pp. 68, 130, pl. lxix, fiz. 6, 1821; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 211, fig. 141; Hald., Monogr., p- 23, pls. i, 11, figs. 1-9. Common in all streams and many ponds. Buiinus Adanson, 1757. Bulinus hypnorum Binney, Shells of N. A., pt. m, p. 99, fig. 170. Physa hypnorum (Linné) Hald., Monogr., p. 36, pl. v, figs. 4-9 ; 1869.] 135 : [Perkins. Nauta elongata Morse, Journ. Port. Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. 1, p. 44; Physa elongata Say, Am. Conch., p. 68, 1821; Gould, Invert. Mass., p-. 214, fig. 143; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 81, pl. xxxvi, fig. 346 ; Aplexus hypnorum Chenu, Man. Conch., Vol. 1, p. 481, fig. 3555. Rare. 3 Ancyius Geoffr., 1767. Ancylus fuscus Adams, Bost. Journ. Nat. Hist., Vol. 11, p. 329, pl. ii, fig. 17; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 224, fig. 152; Binney, Shells of N. A., pt. 11, p. 140, fig. 203. Rather common. Animal flesh-color mottled with black; tentacles long, slender, cylindrical, broad just at the base, bearing the eyes on their inner bases; hyaline white, with a black line through the centre; rostrum somewhat bilobed; foot oblong-oval, rather large; branchial plume triangular on the left side. MEASUREMENTS. Length of shell 7.8 mill. Breadth 5.4 mill. Height 1.8 mill. . foot 4.4 4 oo Mae) aha a tentacles ZS 9 - branchial plume 2.2 “ Ancylus rivularis Say, Am. Conch., p. 60, 1817; Gould, In- vert. Mass., p. 224, fig. 153 ;-Binney, Shells of N. A., pt. 11, p. 142, fig. 238. Not common. TORNATELLIDA. TORNATELLA Lam., 1812. Tornatella puncto-striata C. B. Adams, Bost. Journ. Nat. Hist., Vol. m1, p. 323, pl. iii, fig. 9; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 245, fig. 188; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 127, pl. vii, fig. 143. Not common. Occurs dead on the beach with Bulla. CYLICHNIDZ&. CyLicHna Lovén, 1846. Cylichna oryza Stimps., Check List. Bulla oryza Totten, Am. Journ. Sci., Vol. xxvuit, p. 35; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 168, fig. 93; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 18, pl. xxxv, fig. 327. Very rare. Occurs dead on the beach. Shaler.] 136 [October 6, Urricutus Brown, 1829. Utriculus canaliculatus Stimps., Check List. Bullina canal- aculata Say, Am. Conch., p. 60, pl. xxxix, 1832. Bulla canalicu- lata Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 166, fig. 97; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 19, pl. xxxv, fig. 328; Bulla obstricta Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 167, fig. 96; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 15, pl. v, fig. 96. Not common. BULLIDZ. Buia Klein, 1753. Bulla solitaria Say, Am. Conch., p. 84, 1822. Bulla insculpta Gould, Inyert. Mass., p. 162, fig. 92; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 14, pl. v, fiz. 100. Not common. Occurs on beaches facing mud flats covered with Zostera, or eel grass. [Of the NUDIBRANCHIATA only one specimen has been found; it has not been determined. | Mr. N.S. Shaler made a few remarks upon the changes in the geographical distribution of the American buffalo (Gos americanus). The mound builders of the West have pre- served, in various forms, marks of their acquaintance with all the large mammals of the interior of the continent excepting the buffalo. In some late explorations in the “salt licks” of Kentucky, he had found bones of this animal in great abun- dance just below the recent mould, in a bed about eighteen inches thick; but, in the rich deposits of extinct mammals just beneath, immediately above which traces of worked flint were also found, no buffalo bones were discovered. Mr. W. H. Dall stated that, in Alaska, near the great bend of the river Yukon, the bones of the musk ox and of a buf- falo, indistinguishable, according to Professor Baird, from the American bison, are frequently found upon the surface of the ground, having still an animal odor about them. The 1869 187 [Humboldt Celebration. bones of a fossil elephant occur with them, but they are black and fragile. Yet the Indians and Esquimaux have neither knowledge nor tradition of any large animals save the reindeer and the moose. The President read a letter from the Rev. R. C. Water- ston, presenting a portrait and an autograph letter of Hum- boldt. The portrait was a copy, by Mr. Wight, of an origi- nal painting which he had made in 1852. On motion of Mr. W. T. Brigham it was unanimously voted to present to Mr. Waterston the hearty thanks of the Society, not only for the valuable portrait and autograph, but for the unflagging energy with which he had labored for the success of the Hanoi Centennial Celebration. Dr. 8S. Kneeland bore testimony to the untiring zeal of Mr. W aterston, showing that he had obtained much the greater portion of the subscriptions to the fund, and had, in addition, performed nine-tenths of the other work. Rey. Mr. Waterston, after having acknowledged the favor with which the Society had received his efforts, read a report on behalf of the Committee appointed to arrange for the cel- ebration, with a detailed acount of its proceedings. More than six thousand dollars had been raised by subscription for the Humboldt scholarship in the Museum of Comparative Zodblogy at Cambridge, and after all expenses were paid, at least one thousand dollars additional would be left from the sale of tickets. The Chairman of the Committee was requested to express, on behalf of the Society, its sense of indebtedness to Profes- sor Agassiz for his able address,.and to request a copy for publication. The thanks of the Society were also voted to the Orpheus Musical Association, to Mr. Carl Zerrahn and to Mr. J. K. Paine for their welcome aid in carrying out their share of the celebration. Dall.] 138 [October 20, . October 20, 1869. The President in the chair. Twenty-eight persons present. Dr. B. Joy Jeffries was appointed Secretary pro tempore. Mr. W. H. Dall described the alluvial deposits of the Yukon River, in Alaska. Each annual layer is deposited in three strata—gravel, mud and vegetable matter, according to the specific gravity of the materials. In a bank near Nulato, in a space eight feet high, one hundred and eighty annual layers were counted. The vegetable matter in the lower layers showed signs of carbonization. Some intervals were noticeable where vegetation had attained a considerable growth before it was overwhelmed by another inundation. The roots and stumps were occasionally left i situ, the tops having been broken off and carried away. A close parallelism was shown to exist between these Post Pliocene deposits and the adjacent Miocene Tertiary strata. In the latter the sandstones, though hard and often meta- morphosed, were shown to consist of similar layers of sand, mud and vegetable material. Perhaps a more complete ex- emplification could not be shown of the theory that geological action is going on at the present time at about the same rate as in former ages. The manner and amount of deposition in the present and in the Tertiary epochs, were thus proved to be nearly identical. Four entirely unspotted eggs of the Corvus americanus, obtained by Mr. 8. Jillson in Hudson, were exhibited. Mr. Jillson states that the previous ees he found in the same locality a nest of unspotted crow’s eggs, probably the eggs of the same pair. Dr. T. M. Brewer remarked that such a peculiarity in the crow’s eggs had never, so far as he was aware, been observed before. A few birds, e. g., certain kinds of flycatchers, vireos 1869.] 139 (Perkins. and hawks, have white unspotted eggs, or eggs sparsely spotted, sometimes exhibiting these variations in the same nest. Generally the earlier in the season the greater the number and the brightness of these markings. . A fish hawk that has been several times robbed, instead of laying the usual highly colored egg peculiar to the species, deposits one nearly white, and with very few light spots. But here, in two instances at least, early in the season, the egos of the crow were unspotted, exhibiting only a light greenish ground—an occurrence hitherto unrecorded, and not easy of explanation. November 3, 1869. The President in the chair. Thirty-three persons present. The following paper was presented : — THE MoLiuscan Fauna oF New Haven. Parti. AcEPHALA AND Bryozoa. By Grorcre H. Perks, Pu.D. LAMELLIBRANCHIATA. PHOLADIDZ. CyRTOPLEURA Tryon, 1867. Cyrtopleura truncata Tryon, Am. Journ. Conch., Vol. 11, No. 3, p. 2, App. Paholas truncata Say, Am. Conch., p. 107, 1822; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 248, pl. xxxiv, fig. 223; Sowerby, Thes. Conch., Vol. 11, pl. civ, figs. 29, 30. Not rare in peat bogs and clay near high water mark, associated with Mya and Petricola. Animal much larger than the shell, with the mantle closed; gills two pairs, very long, meeting at the base of the siphonal tube and extending some distance into it. Foot oval, obliquely truncated at the end, across which runs a ridge from which the surface is bevelled to the edges; palpi rather long, triangular; Perkins.] 140 [November 8, iphons united into a tube, which is large, long, and capable of great extension, black at the end, the rest yellowish white. MEASUREMENTS. Length of shell 50 mill. Breadth 20 mill. rf siphon tube 57 ‘“ (contracted). . id “170 “ (extended). foot Lay “<9 mak. rs palpi tos gills 54 “ MartestiA Leach, 1847. Martesia cuneiformis Tryon, Am.. Journ. Conch., Vol. 111, No. 3, p.10, App. Pholas cuneiformis Say, Am. Conch., p. 108, 1822; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 248. Pholas rudis et P. Edwardsi Gray, Syn. Brit. Mus. (teste Tryon). I found one specimen of this species in a pile of shells on the beach. J have not heard of any others being found here. It is not uncommon on the coast of Florida. I have seen it from there in cavities which it had excavated in fragments of large shells. TEREDIDZ. TEREDO Linn., 1758. Teredo navalis Linn., Syst. Nat., 1267; Lam., An. sans Vert., Vol. vi, p. 38; Cuvier, ed. Audouin, Moll., pl. exiv, fig. 2; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 26; Chenu, Man. Conch., Vol. 11, p. 10, fig. 59. Teredo marina Selluis, Hist. Nat. Tered., pl 1, fig. 2, 1733 (teste Tryon). The only locality. in which I have found this species is an old half buried wreck near the entrance of the harbor. This is completely filled with living shells. Animal vermiform, bluish white; mantle closed except at the ends; gills very long and narrow, reddish brown, edges slightly serrate ; foot oval; siphons very long, united except at the ends, attached to the tube near the point of division ; at the ends small, slender, nearly equal, white or yellowish, spotted with rufous, or sometimes clear white; ventral siphon fringed at the end with a few large papille ; dorsal tapering, not fringed; tube somewhat cor- rugated; ovaries large; ova white. 1869.] fet [Perkins. MEASUREMENTS. Length of shell 3 mill. Breadth 2.4 mill. Height 2 mill. rs animal BSi4 SS 7 6 : vent. siphon 3.6 © from points of separation. ‘ dorsal ‘“ a as pallets Ba 8 The Teredos, in the wreck just mentioned did not, as all authors that I have seen state, follow the grain of the wood alone in making their tubes, but quite as often crossed it; and in some parts there were more tubes running across the grain than with it, and, in gen- eral, no regard seemed to be paid to this point. One day, about the middle of May, as I was examining one of the animals under a lens, I noticed a series of pellets, barely visible to the naked eye, coming rapidly from the anal siphon. By the aid of a higher power I found them to be embryos, ova and young, in all stages of development. The ova were spherical, or nearly so. The mature embryos were round, much flattened transverely, a little flattened on one side, and on the opposite furnished with a crescent-shaped portion which bore a, few rather long cilia, by which a brisk motion was effected. The embryos were provided with cilia when quite immature, and even in the ova there was a slow motion, though I could detect no cilia. The immature embryos were of all shapes and sizes, and contin- ually changed their form, though usually one end was larger than the other, and in all cases they were longer and narrower than when fully developed. It may not be the habit of the animal thus to eject eggs and embryos of all degrees of maturity. The specimen ob- served was somewhat injured, and on this account may have been excited to unnatural exertions. The animal seems to live about as well, for a time at least, without the shell and parts contained as with it. Ihave kept them living for many days after the body had broken off just behind the shell, which it does very easily. Xylotrya palmulata Chenu, Man. Conch., Vol. 1, p. 11, figs. 64, 65, 66; Woodward, Man. Moll., p. 507, pl. xxiii, fig. 28; Stimps., Check List. Teredo palmulata et bipalmulata Lamarck, An. sans Vert., Vol. vi, p. 38. A few specimens of this shell were found with Teredo navalis. Perkins.] 142 (November 38, SAXICAVIDZE. SAxIcAVA Fleur de Bell., 1802. Saxicava arctica Linn., Syst. Nat. Sazicava pholadis Lam., An. sans Vert., Vol. v, p. 501. Sazicava distorta Say, Am. Conch., p- 106, 1822; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 61, fig. 40; De Kay, Moll. N.Y, > 22010) peecxd, aio wes: Not common. Lives in sand near low water. Animal white; mantle closed, except a small pedal opening; gills long and narrow, brown; foot when contracted flattened, conical, with a deep byssal groove, blunt at the end; byssus composed of horn-colored fibres; palpi broad at the base, straight posteriorly, curving irregularly to a point in front; siphons distinct only at the tips, which are thickly covered with papille. MYIDZ. Mya Linné, 1747. Mya arenaria Linn., Syst. Nat., 12th ed., p. 1112; Lam., An. sans Vert., Vol. vi, p. 74; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 40; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 240. Mya mercenaria et acuta Say, Am. Conch., p. 108, 1822. Occurs wherever there is mud or sand between high and low water in great abundance, and in the spring the shore is covered for long distances with young shells about an inch long. Animal yellow, mantle closed; gills broad and thin, nearly equal, rounded before, pointed behind; foot when contracted sub-spatulate, obtusely pointed; palpi long and narrow, outside smooth, inside striated; siphons united except at the very end; tube long, near the end sur- rounded by a row of papille; around the ventral opening are two rows of unequal papilla; the dorsal opening is also fringed with smaller ones; each has around the inside a black line. MEASUREMENTS. Length of shell 73 mill. Breadth 47 mill. Height 34 mill. bg gills 2 “ eer WOO ti . foot il“ ci 1 a és palpi 22 bb éé 5 ée 1869.1 143 [Perkins. CORBULID. CorBULA Brug., 1792. Corbula contracta Say, Am. Conch., p. 103, 1822; Gould, In- vert. Mass., p. 43, fig. 37; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 241, pl. xxviii, fig. 285. Not common. I have dug it up alive from sand at low water, near Savin Rock. ANATINIDZE. Lyonsi1A Turton, 1822. Lyonsia hyalina Conrad, Journ. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phil., Vol. VI, p- 261. Osteodesma hyalina Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 46, fig. 31; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 234, pl. xxxiil, fig. 311. Not common; very rarely found alive. PANDORIDZ. CriipiopHora Carpenter, 1864. Clidiophora trilineata Carp., Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1864. Pandora trilineata Say, Am. Conch., pp. 89, 151, pl. ii; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 44; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 239, pl. xxxiil, fig. 310. Abundant in mud in a few feet of water, and often on the shore. Animal light brown; in April and May with ova; mantle closed; gills rather long, narrow, deeply striated ; foot when contracted trun- cate before, curving to a point behind; when extended tongue-shaped and pointed; when directed straight downwards, or when directed forward, rhomboidal, white; palpi very small, triangular; siphons united except at the end, scarcely extended beyond the shell, white, thickly spotted with red and black, fringed with few and blunt papilla, about fourteen around the dorsal and six around the ventral opening, those about the former not at the end, but forming a sort of collar below it. MEASUREMENTS. Length of shell 20 mill. Breadth 12 mill. Height 3.4 mill. ae foot 10 ‘* (extended). ef 9 s Se a 3.8“ (contracted). sy Cras es siphons 2 ‘“ . 5 ** at shell. e palpi 1.6% He 1 “ at base. Perkins.] 144 [November 3, SOLENIDZ. ENSATELLA Swainson, 1840. Ensatella ensis Linn., sp. Ensis ensis Conrad, Am. Journ. Conch., Vol. 111, App. p. 26. Solen ensis Linn., Syst. Nat., 1114; Lam., An. sans Vert., Vol. v1, p. 55; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 29; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 242, pl. xxi, fig. 313. Dead shells not uncommon; rarely found alive. It is smaller, and lives in deeper water than north, not being found above low water. Animal white; mantle open in front and behind, with a small fissure near the middle, broadly thickened on the margin; gills long and narrow; foot larger than all the rest of the body, flattened-cylindri- cal, increasing somewhat in size towards the end, which is obliquely truncated, and the sides bevelled from a central line; palpi long and narrow, except at the base, which extends forward in a wing-like projection; siphons very short, united, except at the end, covered with short papille, and fringed around the openings with somewhat longer ones; muscle long and thin. MEASUREMENTS. Length of shell 126 mill. Breadth 21.4 mill. Gs foot 88 ‘“* (contracted). ‘“ 13 “at the end. Be gills 47 “ ee eS ce palpi 15.2 “ « 13 “ at base. SOLECURTIDZ. SiziquA Miuhl., 1811. Siliqua costata Conrad, Am. Journ. Conch., Vol. m1, No. 3, p. 24, App. Machera costata Gould, Invert. Mass., pp. 24, 34; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 244, pl. xxxii, fig. 301. Solen costatus Say, Am. Conch, p. 104, 1822. Solecurtus costatus Say, Am. Conch., p. 168, pl. xvii, 1822. Very rare and small. TELLINID. Ancutus Mihl., 1811. Angulus tenera Tryon, Am. Journ. Conch., Vol. 111, No. 5, p. - 96. Tellina tenera Say, Am. Conch., p. 98, 1822; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 68, fig. 44; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 209, pl. xxvi, fig. 271. 1869.] 145 [Perkins. Not very common. Lives in a few feet of water, buried in sand. Animal white ; mantle open, fringed with short papille; gills serrate on the edges; foot when contracted curved below, above curved to a sharp point anteriorly, and more abruptly curved behind, grooved below; palpi triangular, not long, striated coarsely inside; siphons distinct, long, slender. Angulus polita? Tryon, Am. Journ. Conch., Vol. 111, pt. v, p- 94, App. Tellina polita Say, Am. Conch., p. 97, 1822; De Kay, BG IN- Y :, p. 210. A few specimens have been found which are somewhat doubtfully referred to this species. PERONEA Poli, 1791. Peronea tenta Tryon, Am. Journ. Conch., Vol. 111, pt. v, p. 98, App. Tellina tenia Say, Am. Conch., p. 228, pl. Ixv, fig. 3, 1822; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 68, fig. 43; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 210. Very rare. | Macoma Leach, 1819. Macoma fusca Stimps., Check List. Psamobia fusca Say, Am. Conch., p. 126, 1826. Sanguinolaria fusca Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 66, fig. 42; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 212, pl. xxxu, fig. 304. Very large and abundant. It thrives best in water that is not very salt, and is much larger and more abundant near the mouths of fresh water streams than outside the harbor. It lives in sand or mud, just beneath the surface, below, or near low water. Animal white; man- tle open in front, edge ruffled and bordered with dark brown; gills *small, one on each side; foot tongue-shaped; when extended nearly as long as the shell; palpi triangular, large; siphons very long and. slender, when extended nearly twice as long as the shell. The ani- mal moves quite briskly by jerking itself along with its foot. MEASUREMENTS. Length of shell 17 mill. Breadth 13.8 mill. Height 6.6 mill. 5 ventral siphon 25 “ : 3 te gat pace 66 dorsal 66 17 66 cc 2 66 “ foot ness ef The Some of the specimens are 41 mill. long by 32 broad. PROCEEDINGS B. & N. H.=VOL. XIII. 10 DECEMBER, 1869. Perkins.] 146 [November 8, CumINGIA Sowerby, 1833. Cumingia tellinoides Conrad, Journ. Acad. Nat. Se., Vol. vil, p. 234; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 56, fig. 34; De Kay, Moll. N.Y: p: 233 Very rare. MACTRIDZ. MULINEA Gray, 1837. Mulinea lateralis Conrad, Am. Journ. Conch., Vol. 11, pt. m1, p- 31, App. Aactra lateralis Say, Am. Conch., p. 101, 1822; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 54, figs. 34, 85; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p: 230, pl. xxix, fig. 287. Mactra rostrata Philippe, Abbild. 111, 138, pl. iii, fig. 6, 1845. Mactra corbuloides Desh., Reeves’s Conch., fig. 103 (teste Conrad). Obtained abundantly by dredging, but usually not common on shore. In the fall of 1868, however, great numbers were thrown upon the beach, forming long ridges. Animal white; mantle open; foot tongue-shaped; when fully extended, as long as the shell; siphons united, fringed at the ends, where they are scarcely distinct, the ven- tral extending a little beyond the dorsal; palpi long, pointed, faleate. MEASUREMENTS. Length of shell 16.4 mill. Breadth 12.8 mill. 66 siphon 4 a6 “ce 5 74 e foot 16 “« (extended). HEMIMACTRA Swainson, 1840. Hemimactra solidissima Conrad, Am. Journ. Conch., Vol. * Itt, pt. 111, p. 32, App. Mactra solidissima Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 51; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 229, pl. xxix, fig. 286. Mactra similis ‘Say, Am. Conch., p. 101, 1822; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 52, note; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 230. Not very common, found only outside the harbor. Animal white; mantle open; gills large, thin, nearly equal; foot moderately large; when extended, as long as the shell, tongue-shaped; when contracted, rhomboidal, notched in the middle of the lower margin; palpi very ~ long, narrow; siphons short, distinct only at the end; openings fringed. 1869.] 147 MEASUREMERTS. Length of shell 80 mill. Breadth 55 mill. & foot 21 “ (contracted). ae ES gills 45 “ eer aO Bese 66 palpi 81 66 66. i 66 a siphons 10 “ Teta (rE [Perkins. After comparing specimens from several localities, I am convinced that the similis Say, is identical with this species, not its young, as some suppose, for the characters of Say’s species are found in speci- mens of large size, but simply a variety due to difference of station. I have not yet seen specimens afiswering to both species from the same locality. Those from Chelsea Beach have the flatter, less tri- angular form ascribed to solidissima, those from here all have the triangular form of Say’s similis, while those from Coney Island, N. Y., are so nearly intermediate as to make it impossible to refer them to either. The young of all are more trigonal than the old, but difference in station seems to make great differences in the shell. The British species most nearly allied to solidissima, M. solida, according to Clark, “ varies in shape in every locality,” + and the same seems to be true, in some degree at least, in respect to our own. The slight differences mentioned as distinguishing the two species aside from the form, are found in nearly all that I have seen, and do not coincide with any particular form. satisfactorily VENERIDZ. CYTHEREA Lamarck, 1805. Cytherea Sayii Conrad. Cytherea convexa Gould, Invert. Mass., p- 34, fig. 49; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 216, pl. xxvii, fig. 279. Cal- lista convexa Say, Journ. Acad. Nat. Sc. Phil., Vol. 1v, p. 149, pl xii, fig. 3, 1824. Very rare. “6 Sayit.” Crassivénus mercenaria nobis. Check List. Mr. Say’s specific name “ convexa” being, as Mr. Conrad says, preoccupied, he proposes the above specific name, . CRASSIVENUS nov. gen. Mercenaria violacea Stimps., Venus mercenaria Linn., Syst. Nat., 1131; Lam., An. 1 Brit. Mar. Test. Moll., p. 105, London, 1855. Perkins.] 148 [November 3, sans Vert., Vol. v1, p. 346; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 85, fig. 67; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 217, pl. xxvii, fig. 276. Common round clam. Occurs abundantly in sand just below tide level. Animal with mantle open freely, except behind, where it is united to form two very short siphons, which are blackish, fringed at the ends, bright yellow inside; the mantle is thickened and ruffled at the edge, yellowish white; gills, two pairs, greenish white, oblong- ovate, somewhat pointed behind, hanging obliquely, inner a little larger; foot rather large, when contracted broad and short, strongly striated, somewhat crenulate on the lower edge, which is sharp, broadest before and obtusely rounded behind, pointed bluntly, color buff yellow; palpi lanceolate, smooth without, striated within; mus- cles pink on the inner side, white on the outer, anterior pear-shaped, posterior ovate. MEASUREMENTS. Length of shell 77 mill. Breadth 71 mill. Height 54 mill. Ss foot 37 = i 15 “ anteriorly. ED gills 28 and 29 ee re 15 and 16.4 mill. palpi 126 re 7 mill. - siphon tube 14 * x td As, according to the British Association rules, no specific name can be made generic, those formerly given to this and the next species do not hold. I therefore propose the names here given. TOTTENIANS nov. gen. Totteniata, gemma nobis. Gemma Totteni Stimps., Check List. Venus gemma Totten, Am. Journ. Sc., Vol. xxvi, p. 366; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 88, fig. 51; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 218, pl. See. 201. Abundant in places, but not generally common. This species is viviparous. In living specimens collected in the latter part of Jan- uary, 1869, I found seal well formed young. There were in some thirty six, But the average number was thirty three. These young shells were oval, flat, transparent, longer than broad, the reverse of what is usual in the adult, and in the same adult shell of nearly equal — size. In one shell, which contained thirty six, the young measured three fifths mill. long and two fifths mill. broad, the adult shell being three mill. long and three and two fifths mill. broad. Ihave changed - the name of this shell for the reason mentioned under the preceding species. 1869.] 149 [Perkins, PETRICOLIDZ. PETRICOLA Lam. Petricola pholadiformis Lam., An. sans Vert., Vol. vi, p. 159; Say, Am. Conch., p. 222, pl. lx, fig. 1, 1834; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 63; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 228, pl. cxxviii, fig. 282. Petricola fornicata Say, Am. Conch., p. 106. Abundant in clay, peat bogs, old timber, etc., near high water. Animal white; mantle closed in front, thickened along the closed edge; gills long, rather narrow, yellow; foot when expanded broad and short, triangular, pointed in front and slanting to a point behind, grooved: palpi triangular, siphons united for about a fifth of their extended length, after that distinct, diverging, tapering,—ventral long- est; openings fringed, the ventral siphon having six long incurved papillz, which are fringed on the upper surface by a row of small papille on each side, which are again in like manner fringed, alter- nating with, and a little outside of, these are six somewhat smaller, and outside of these another row of much smaller papille; these two latter rows are slightly fringed; the dorsal siphon has inside a few large, simple papillz, and outside of these numerous smaller ones. The animal is quite active in its movements. MEASUREMENTS. Length of shell 43.6 mill. Breadth 15.6 mill., convex 14.4 mill. = vent. siphon 62 e # 4.6 ‘ at base, 3.2 at tip. “cc dor. 6c 45 ce ce 5 (73 6c 2.4 oo af foot nae 5. (extended), ~ §°°\- 1a.9-). ee gills 23 6c 'T5 9 75 a palpi 9.4 i Cahy Petricola dactylus Sby., 1834; Say, Am. Conch., p. 222, pl. lx; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 65, fig. 41; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 228, pl. XXViil, fig. 283. Not as common as the preceding, and, seems to live in deeper water, as I have not found it living with it, but only dead shells on the beach. It is often larger and stouter than P. pholadiformis, and is, I believe, only a variety of it. Perkins. ] 150 [November 3, CARDIADZ. L&VICARDIUM! Swainson, 1840, Levicardium Mortoni. Liocardium Mortoni Stimps., Check List. Cardium Mortoni Conrad, Journ. Acad. Nat. Se. Phil, Vol. VI, p. 259, pl. x, figs. 5,6, 7; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 91; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 207, pl. xxiii, fig, 251. Quite common at certain seasons, but usually rather rare. It varies greatly in color, and is usually roughened, as if weathered, on the outside. Animal white; mantle open, edge somewhat ruffled; gills two pair, inner much larger than outer; foot large and long, when contracted it is folded back upon itself; palpi not long, narrow; siphon tube merely a cireular opening in the mantle surrounded by numerous short papille. Carpium Linné, 1758. Cardium pinnulatum Conrad; Gould, Invert. Mass., p, 90, fig, 57; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 205, pl. xxii, fig. 249. Very rare, collected near the entrance of the harbor by Professor Verrill. ' ASTARTIDZ, ASTARTE Sowerby, 1816, Astarte lutea? nobis. Shell gibbous, thick, inequilateral, subtrigonal, length and breadth nearly equal, surface curving regularly from the umbones to the op- posite edge, highest just above the middle; beaks prominent, much incurved, not meeting; lunule deep, heart-shaped; surface undulated by twenty or more large, elevated ridges, which are concentric, nearly equidistant, the sulcations between nearly as broad as the ridges, which are highest and sharpest on the upper half of the shell, becoming finer, but not disappearing at the ends, in the lunule being merely coarse stri; anterior slope incurved; posterior slope slightly curved; margin distinctly crenulated within; teeth stout, summits somewhat rounded; in the right valve one cardinal tooth with a deep - 1QOften, but incorrectly, written ZLiocardium. The name is from levis and cardium. 2 Juateus, orange colored. 1869.1] 151 [Perkins. pit on either side of it, and a small rudimentary lateral tooth on each side of the shell; left valve with two scarcely diverging cardinal teeth separated by a deep pit; hinge margin thin, not very broad; pallial impression deep, simple; muscular impression rather deep; epidermis chestnut brown, interior pearly white. Length twenty three mill. (.9 in.), breadth twenty one mill. (.82 in.), height twelve mill. (.48 in.). Animal with mantle open, light yellow, edged with a cord of bright orange, edge plain; gills not large, two on each side, very unequal, inner much largest, somewhat rhomboidal; outer subtriangular united to the inner behind and so appearing like a reflexed portion of it; white, finely striated; foot thin, tongue-shaped, when fully extended nearly as long as the shell, when contracted wedge-shaped; color bright orange striped longitudinally with light yellow; palpi not long, broadly lanceolate; siphons nbne, merely an opening in the mantle serving instead; ovaries full of bright orange ova in April. MEASUREMENTS. Length of foot 9 mill. (contracted). Breadth4 mill. ss outer gills 6.6 * SEB ou 66 inner 66 9 66 $6 6 66 we palypier <6 uy ee “e 2.2 “ at base. This shell in some respects approaches the semisulcata Leach, and still more closely castanea Say, but affords good differences. From the former it differs in form, being broader and not as long, in its greater thickness, smaller and more numerous ridges continued to the edge, _ broader lunule, and more prominent and curved beaks. It differs from the latter in its much narrower hinge margin, smaller ,and less prom- inent teeth, less elevated beaks, less oblique and narrower outline, _and strong ridges. To show its differences in form I give com- parative measurements. ¥ A. castanea Say. A. semisulcata Leach. A, lutea nobis. Length 23 mill..9 in. 23 mill..9 in. 23 mill. .9 in. Breadth 24.4 ‘ .95 in. Qe 77 In. Zi eV OAr ihe Height 13.4 “ .58 in. 8.4 “ ,34 in, 12 % 348 im, Perkins.] 152 [November 38, KELLIADZA. Kewx1a Turton, 1822. Kellia planulata Stimpson, Shells of N. E., p. 17. Kellia rubra Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 60, fig. 23; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 232. Not common, occurs in accumulations of small shells on the shore. SOLENOMYADZ. SoLENoMYA?! Lamarck, 1818. Solenomya velum. Solemya velum Say, Am. Conch., p. 105, 1822; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 35; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 245, pl. xxx, fig. 292. Common on the beach, though rarely living. It lives in sand at and below low water mark. Animal white; mantle closed except at the ends, widely open anteriorly for the foot, and posteriorly forming a very short tube surrounded by globular papillae; size of this open- ing varies considerably at different times, and occasionally it is con- tracted across the middle, making two apertures, which has probably caused some writers to state that there existed two openings; gills behind the foot, one on each side thick, narrow, the incurved ventral edges meeting so as to form a cylindrical dark brown mass, which is in strong contrast with the other parts, which are white; foot long, obliquely truncated at the end, which is broadly and deeply cleft, fringed around the edge; around the posterior part of the pedal opening the mantle has about fourteen short, round papille, some of which are colored and may serve as ocelli; epidermal fringe at- tached to the mantle, and when the shell is closely shut folded inward. CYRENIDZ. SpHzRium Scap., 1777. Spherium sulcatum Prime, Am. Corbic., p. 33, fig. 25. Cyclas similis Say, Am. Conch., p. 54, 1816; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 72, fig. 53; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 222, pl. xxv, fig. 264. Very abundant in streams. 1 Often, but incorrectly, written Solemya. It comes from Solen and Mya. 1869.] 153 . [ Perkins. Spherium partumeium Prime, Am. Corbic., p. 45, fig. 42. Cyclas partumeia Say, Am. Conch., p.112, 1822; Gould, Invert. Mass., p- 73, fig. 54; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 223, pl. xxv, fig. 262. Rare and small. Spherium solidulum Prime, Am. Corbic., p. 36, fig. 27. Cy- clas solidula Prime, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. rv, p. 158, 1851. Animal white; mantle open, edged with an orange cord; gills rather narrow; foot long, tongue-shaped; palpi long and narrow, rounded at the tips; siphons distinct, simple at the ends, not long, broad, ventral nearly twice as large as the dorsal, orange or reddish yellow, or rarely white; shell filled with young in May, usually con- taining ten of various sizes; some are contained in the gills and some in the mantle, the largest being four mill. long, three broad and two high. Spherium securis Prime, Am. Corbic., p. 49, fig. 47. Cyclas securis et cardissa Prime, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. 1v, p. 160, 1851. Not uncommon in some ponds. The foot is very long and narrow, and the animal, like the Pisidiums, crawls very rapidly by extending it fully and, holding by the end, drawing the shell near to it. In this way they crawl up the sides of a glass vase with ease, though a slight jar causes them to fall. Pisiprum Pfeiffer, 1821. Pisidium eequilaterale Prime, Am. Corbic., p. 63, figs. 65, 66; do. Bost. Journ. Nat. Hist., Vol. v1, p. 366, pl. xii, figs. 23-25. Lives in ponds but is not common. Animal flesh color; foot very long, strap-shaped, rounded at the tip; siphons very short, tapering, simple at the ends. Pisidium abditum Haldeman, Proc. Acad. Nat. Se. Phil., Vol. 1, p- 53, 1841; Prime, Am. Corbic., p. 68, fig. 72; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p- 226. Pisidium obscurum Prime, Bost. Journ. Nat. Hist., Vol. 1v, p- 161. Pisidium minus Stimpson, Shells of N. E., p. 16. Not common. Lives in quiet ponds. Pisidium compressum Prime, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. rv, p. 164; do. Am. Corbic., p. 65, fig. 68. Not common. Lives in ponds and ditches. . Pisidium variabile Prime, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. rv, p- 163; do. Am. Corbic., p. 66, fig. 69. Not very rare. Perkins.] af 54 [November 8, Pisidium virginicum (Bourg.) Prime, Am. Corbic., p. 61, figs. 61,62. Cyclas dubia Say, Am. Conch., p. 55, 1816; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 75, fig. 56. Pisidium abruptum Haldeman, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sc. Phil., Vol. 1, p. 53. Very rare. UNIONIDZ.. Nara Swainson, 1840. WNaia complanatus. Unio complanatus Lea, Proc. Acad. Nat. Se. Phil.; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 107, figs. 68-70 ; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 188, pl. xxii, fig. 246. Unio purpureus Say, Am. Conch., pp- 50, 135, pl. lxxi, fig. 7, 1816. Very common, but usually small and very badly eroded. Animal variable in color, yellow or white; mantle open, thin, white, mottled thickly with yellow flakes, edge plain; gills large and thick, hanging horizontally, straight before, rounded behind, transversely striated with numerous lines, which are connected by fine cross lines, giving to the gill a beautifully tessellated appearance; lower edge darker; inner gilla little larger; foot when extended tongue-shape, half to two thirds as long as the shell; palpi short, broad, rounded at the ends, striated within; siphons very short, barely projecting beyond the shell, broad and flat, fringed with short papille; ends black, or nearly so, papille lighter. MEASUREMENTS. Length of shell 106° mill. Breadth 61 mill. Height 32 mill. i foot 48 — ** (contracted): “) > tau 66 gills 58 66 46 93 “ce 13 palpi Bi (73 6c 5 6c we ventral siphon 30 “ i) Mee ¢ dorsal ‘“ 20.6 “ 8 PBS AS EuryniA, Rafinesque. Eurynia nasuta Stimps., Shells of N. E., p. 13 (Agassiz Mss.) ; Morse, Journ. Port. Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. 1, p. 54. Unio nasutus Say, Am. Conch., p. 52, pl. Ixxii, fig. 1, 1816; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 109, fir. 71; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 191, pl. xx, fig. 239. Collected in West River and Whitneyville Pond by Professor Ver- rill. Not common. 1869.] 155 “[Perkins. LAMPSILIS Rafinesque, 1820. Lampsilis radiata Stimpson, Shells of N. E., p. 13 (Agassiz Mss.); Morse, Journ. Port.Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. 1, p. 47. Unio radi- atus Lam., An. sans Vert., Vol. vi, p. 535; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 110, fig. 73; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 189. Common in Saltonstall Lake and Whitneyville Pond. MARGARITANA Schum., 1817. Sub genus StROPHITUS Raf. Margaritana undulata Lea, Trans. Am. Phil. Soc. Alasma- donta undulata Say, Am. Conch., p. 62, 1819; Gould, Invert. Mass., p- 115, fig. 76; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 198, pl. xv, fig. 227. Not common. Occurs in Whitneyville Pond. AnopontTa Cuvier, 1798. Anodonta cataracta Say, Am. Conch., p. 53, pl. Ixxi, fig. 4, 1816. Anodonta fluviatilis Lea, Trans. Am. Phil. Soc., Vol. v1, p. 38; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 117, fig. 80; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 203, pl. xl, fig. 358. Quite common in rivers and ponds, being much larger in the latter. MYTILIDZ. MyTILUs ‘Linné, 1758. Mytilus edulis (Linn.) Lam., An. sans Vert., Vol. vm, p. 47; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 121, fig. 82. Mytilus borealis (Lam.) De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 182, pl. xiii, fig. 222. Mytilus notatus De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 182, pl. xiii, fig. 223 (young). Mytilus pellucidus De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 183, pl. xxiv, fig. 256. Common in all pools near low water mark, and often very finely marked with blue, green or black. The animal varies in color from white to deep orange; mantle freely open, edge thickened, bordered by a dark line, double, outer part simple, inner from the siphonal openings to about the middle of the ventral side fringed with short, dark, branched papille; gills large, long, equal; foot always dark brown, short, thick, obtusely pointed, grooved; palpi triangular, round pointed at the ends, beveled from a median elevated line to the edges, striate within. Perkins.] 1 56 (November 8, MEASUREMENTS. Length of shell 52 mill. Breadth 29 mill. Height 21 mill. ee foot 10 “ (contracted). o 54 * 66 palpi 1 6c “co 6 “ce 66 gills 88 66 ce 11 “ MopioLa Lam., 1798. Sub genus BRACHYDONTES Swainson, 1840. Brachydontes plicatula Chenu, Man. Conch., Vol. 1, p. 155. Modiola plicatula Lam., An. sans Vert., Vol. vu, p. 22; Gould, In- vert. Mass., p. 125, fig. 81; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 184, pl. xxiv, fig. 258. Very abundant everywhere in mud, peat bogs, or on rocks above low water mark. Animal varies in color from white to salmon; mantle freely open, white edged with brown, somewhat ruffled; gills nearly equal; foot short, brown, obtusely pointed, with a byssal groove; palpi long, thin, finely striated, beveled on the inner side from a central ridge. Brachydontes hamatus nobis. Mytilus hamatus Say, Am. Conch. pp. 91, 204, pl. 1, 1822; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 183. Shell very much incurved and contracted at the beaks, which are acute, and directed a little outward; surface covered with numerous fine ribs about the same width as the spaces between, more numerous anteriorly; lines of growth distinct, especially on the ribs, making them slightly cancellated; byssus short and thick, shell depressed about the byssal opening; color dark brown or nearly black, light- est on the ribs and towards the ventral margin; inside dark purple, shading to white on the edge. Animal with mantle open, edge double, whitish, mottled with numerous reddish brown spots, and blackish on the edge, gills light yellow, the right a little longest, ob- tusely pointed; foot orange, cylindrical, pointed, grooved; palpi slender, beveled on the inner surfaces from a median ridge, striated. This shell, described by Mr. Say from the Gulf of Mexico, occurs in abundance on southern oysters, which are planted here; whether it is naturalized is doubtful. An examination of the animal has led me to consider it a Modiola rather than a Mytilus. It varies greatly in form from being more than twice as long as broad, to about the same length and breadth. ‘The. largest specimen I have seen is sixty six mill. (2.6 in.) long and thirty seven mill. (.45 in.) broad. 1869.] vay [Perxins. MEASUREMENTS. Length of shell 48 mill. Breadth 32 mill. Height 19 mill. es foot 10.6 .‘ rf 3 : gills 32 Oa ee palp it, | COs ZIG Most of the specimens are more sharply incurved than Mr. Say’s figure. In many the male of a species of Pinnotheres was living. Modiola modiolus Linn., Syst. Nat., 1158; Turton, Brit. Biv.; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 123; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 185, pl. xxiv, fig. 257. Modiola americana Leach. Modiola papuana Lam., An. sans Vert., Vol. vir, p.17; Say, Am. Conch., p. 199, pl. xlv, 1832. Mytilus barbatus Linn. et Al. Not common, and rather small, but finely colored and heavily fringed with epidermal filaments. ARCADZ. ARGINA Gray, 1840. Argina pexata Gray. Arca pexata Say, Am. Conch., p. 93, 1822; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 95, fig. 60; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 176, pl. xii, fig. 211. Very common just below low water mark, and often found alive on the shore at low tide. Animal with mantle freely open, edge ruffed, dark brown, with interrupted dark lines next the shell, and a row of ocelli; gills triangular, large, pointed behind, deep red, emitting a reddish fluid when the shell is opened; foot pointed behind; before with a straight, sharp edge; deeply grooved beneath, yellow, not very extensile; palpi none. SCAPHARCA Gray, 1847. Scapharea transversa Say, Am. Conch., p. 93, 1822; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 96; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 177, pl. xii, fig. 212. Not uncommon, though more rare, than the preceding. Animal with mantle open, edge plain, with a row of ocelli; gills dark red or nearly black, attached to broad, white, sickle-shaped supports, curv- ing about the posterior muscle, and, as in the preceding species, ejecting a reddish liquid when the shell is opened; foot bright yellow, heeled, rounded behind, obtusely pointed before, quite large, deeply grooved; when extended triangular, and as long as the shell; palpi Porkins.] ) 158 [November 8, none, but a long narrow fold of the branchial membrane on each side . of the mouth takes their place. NUCULIDZ. Nucora Lamarck, 1799. Nucula proxima Say, Am. Conch., p. 94, 1822; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 103, fig. 63; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 79, pl. xii, fig. 215. Not common on the beach, but obtained plentifully by dredging. Animal white; mantle freely open, margin double, ruffled, striated; gills small, elongate-triangular, outer a little the longer, broad an- teriorly, tapering to a point behind; foot flattened, cylindrical, end- ing in an oval disk, which is thin, serrate on the edges, with numerous short, thick papille, striated on both sides, and when withdrawn, folded together through the middle; palpi two pairs, outer with a thin parchment-like end, below which is a narrow striated lamina folded upon itself longitudinally; inner pair linear, long, united about the mouth; siphons wanting. Nucula radiata De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 179, pl. xii, fig. 216. Shells answering to this description are found here, but I believe that the species is founded merely upon the young of JV. proxima, and ought therefore to be united with it, but as I have not absolute proof that this is so, I leave it separate. LEDIDZ. Youpia Miill., 1832. Yoldia limatula Woodward, Man. Conch., p. 429, fig. 220. Nucula limatula Say, Am. Conch., p. 63, pl. xii, 1831; Gould, In- vert. Mass., p. 98, fig. 62; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 183, pl. xiii, fig. 218. Leda limatula Stimpson, Shells of N. E., p. 10. Not common, scarcely ever found on the beach, but obtained abundantly by dredging a few miles off the lighthouse in four to six fathoms. Mantle open, edge somewhat thickened, plain anteriorly for about a third of its length, the remaining two thirds are fringed with about fifty moderately long, simple papille, some of which are forked at the end; gills small, narrow, coarsely striated; foot long, subcylindrical, increasing in size towards the end, which is obliquely truncated, deeply cleft and furnished with short, rounded papille; 1869.] » 159 [Perkins. anteriorly it is heeled, and when drawn into the shell is folded upon itself; palpi large, thick, triangular; siphons united, not long, ends not fringed, and withdrawn at times entirely within the edge of the mantle. PECTINIDZ. PEecTEN Brug., 1789. Pecten irradians Lam., An. sans Vert., Vol. vi, p. 143. Pec- ten concentricus Say, Am. Conch., p. 88, 1822; Gould, Invert. Mass., p- 134, fig. 88; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 172, pl. xi, fig. 205. Usually not common, and very small, but sometimes it is thrown upon the shore in great numbers. Animal very active, jumping and swimming by a rapid opening and closing of the valves; mantle open, edge much thickened, with an outer fringe of several rows of papillz, the inner being largest, and among them about thirty bluish ocelli, of various sizes and at unequal intervals; inside of these, from a tenth to a quarter of an inch, according to the size of the animal, is a raised yellow cord, darker than the mantle, which bears a row ot papilla; the space between the inner and outer rows is thickly striated ; gills semicircular, curving about the large muscle, rather broad and thick; foot very small, subcylindrical, tapering to an ob- tuse point, very deeply grcoved; palpi broadly triangular, smooth outside, obliquely striated within. OSTREIDZ. OstTREA Linn., 1758. Ostrea virginica Lam., An. sans Vert., Vol. vir, p. 225; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 169. Ostrea virginiana Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 136. The southern oyster is brought here in great quantities and planted in the spring, to be taken up in the fall, as it cannot endure the cold of winter. By many writers it is regarded as the same as Ostrea canadensis Lam. Ostrea borealis Lam., An. sans Vert., Vol. vir, p. 220; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 137; De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 169, pl. x, fig. 204. Native or northern oyster. It is quite abundant, in some places forming large beds. It is very variable in shape, accommodating itself to any unevenness of the surface on which it grows. I found, Perkins.] 160 [November 8, in deserted Teredo tubes, quite a number that were tubular in form, some being forty nine mill. long, seven mill. high and five and two fifths mill. broad. Others, growing where tubes crossed, had grown out on each side, forming a quite regular T. ‘The upper valve was flat in all cases. Animal whitish; mantle open, edge double, much thickened, fringed with numerous papille; gills long, rather narrow, curved so that the ends are nearly at right angles, nearly equal, edged with a white cord; foot none; palpi not long, broad at the base, anterior edge curved, posterior nearly straight, striated within. MEASUREMENTS. Length of shell 90 mill. Breadth 57 mill. gf animal 72 er 5 Al. ot gills, 62:2, * ee 3 66 palpi 8 cc 6c 15 (74 ANOMIADZ. AnomiA Linné, 1767. Anomia ephippium Linn., Syst. Nat., 1150; Lam., An. sans Vert., Vol. vu, p. 2738; Gould, Invert. Mass., p. 138; De Kay, Moll. Na Y5 pl. xii, fie. 209: Very common on rocks, old shells, ete., near low water mark. TUNICA PAs ASCIDIADZ. Ascip1a Linné, 1758. Ascidia manhattensis De Kay, Moll. N. Y., p. 259. Common near low water on eel-grass, stones, chips, etc., and at times thrown upon the shore in large numbers. MouGuta. . Molgula arenata Stimps. Not common usually. It was, however, at one time dredged in abundance east of the Lighthouse, by Prof. F. A. Bradley. Didemnium sp? One cluster of an Ascidian of this genus has been found by Prof. Verrill. 1869.] 161 [Perkins. POLY ZOA. Marine. EScCHARINA. Escharina lineata Leidy, Proc. Acad. Nat. Se. Phil. Not uncommon on old shells and stones. Escharina variabilis Leidy, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sc. Phil. Common on everything. MEMBRANIPORA, Membranipora tenuis Desor. Common on fucus. CELLULARIA. Cellularia turrita Desor. Quite common, thrown on the beach by storms. LEPRALIA. One species; undetermined. Fresh Waiter. FREDERICELLA. Fredericella regina Leidy; Hyatt, Obs. on Polyzoa, Am. Nat., Vol. 1, p. 64, pl. ili. PECTINATELLA. Pectinatella magnifica Leidy; Hyatt, Obs. on Polyzoa, Am. Wat. Voli, ps 136, pl. iv. Plumatella sp? These are not uncommon in ponds. [The Polyzoa, both fresh water and marine, have not been studied carefully, and there is little doubt that many more species exist here. ] In conclusion, I give a list of the species reported from Long _ Island Sound, but not yet found in New Haven Bay. CEPHALOPODA. Loligo illecebrosa Les. Mentioned as common in various places. PROCEEDINGS B. S. N. H.— VOL. XIII. 11 DECEMBER, 1869. Perkins.] 16 9 [November 3, GASTEROPODA. Fasciolaria ligata Mighl. Stonington, Ct., Linsley. Bela harpularia Couth. Stratford, Ct., Linsley. Fusus imbricatus De Kay. ae e Fusus Trumbulli Linsley. Stonington, Ct., Linsley. Buccinum undulatum. J is Buccinum zonalis Linsley. —s “* ee Nassa vibex Say. New Haven, Ct., us Purpura lapillus. Stonington, Ct., Linsley. Columbella rosacea Gould. Stonington, Linsley. Pleurotoma bicarinata Couth. vs *e Mamma? immaculata. Stonington, Linsley, and Gardiner’s Bay, Long Island, N. Y., S. Smith. Natica clausa Sowb. Stonington, Linsley. Natica pusilla Say. % be Gardiner’s Bay, L. I., S. Smith. Eulima subangulata Stimps. Gardiner’s Bay, L. I., S. Smith. Czcum pulchellum Stimps. ws “6 “6 Czecum Cooperi Smith. “6 6 6 Vermetus radicula Stimps. 6 “6 é Vermetus lumbricalis Lam. New Haven and Stonington, Linsley. Scalaria clathrus Linn. Stonington, Linsley. Littorina littorea Linn. o ce Littorina peconica Smith. Gardiner’s Bay, L. I., S. Smith. Lacuna neritoidea Gould. Oyster River, Ct., Linsley. Margarita obscura Couth. Stonington, Ct., “ Crucibulum striatum Say. Gardiner’s Bay, S. Smith. Tectura alveus Couth. Stratford, Ct., Linsley. Chiton marmoreus O. Fabr. Stonington, Linsley. Chiton apiculatus Say, Gardiner’s Bay, N. Y., S. Smith. Chiton ruber Lowe, Stonington, Ct., Linsley. NUDIBRANCHIATA. (Kolis vermiferus Smith, Gardiner’s Bay, N. Y. LAMELLIBRANCHIATA. Teredo dilitata Stimps. Gardiner’s Bay, N. Y., S. Smith. Pholas crispata Linn. Stonington, Ct., Linsley. 1869.] 163 [Perkins. Thracia Conradi Couth. Gardiner’s Bay, Smith. Thracia truncata Mich. Stonington, Ct., Linsley. Solenomya borealis Totten. et ae Siliquaria gibba Spengl. Stratford, Ct., Linsley. Siliquaria bidens Chem. ‘Gardiner’s Bay, N. Y., Smith. Siliquaria fragilis Couth. Stonington, Linsley. Macoma sabulosa Sprengl. Stonington and Stratford, Ct., Linsley. Solen viridis Say. Stonington, Linsley. Tellina versicolor, Cozz. Stratford, Ct., Linsley. Tellina solidula Soland. Stonington, Linsley. Ceronia arctata Conr. 66 ‘6 Abra equalis Say. “L ae Cytherea morrhuana Linsl. “ ct Crassivenus é notata Say. a Mercenaria Cardita borealis Conr. Stonington, Ct., Linsley and Gardiner’s Bay, L. 1, 8. Smith. Astarte castanea Say, Stonington, Linsley. Astarte semisulcata Leach. ‘ fie Astarte quadrans, Gould. ‘ ue Astarte mactracea Linsley, Stratford, Ct., Linsley and Gardiner’s Bay, Smith. Cyprina islandica Linn. Stonington, Linsley. Montacuta elevata Stimps. Gardiner’s Bay, L. L, S. Snnth. Montacuta bidentata Gould. Stonington, Linsley. Lucina filosa Stimps. ee we Thyasira Gouldiana Stimps. oe ne Serripes Greenlandicus. a a Modiolaria levigata Gray. Gardiner’s Bay, L. I, 8. Smith. Modiolaria discors Linn. Oyster River, Ct., Linsley and Gardi- ner’s Bay, L. L., 8. Smith. Yoldia sapotilla Gould, Gardiner’s Bay, L. I., S. Sinith. Nucula tenuis Mont. Stonington, Linsley. Pecten fuscus Gould. ae as Anomia aculeata Gmel. Stratford, Linsley. Notre. Many of Linsley’s species came from fish-stomachs. His Nautilus connecticutensis is a Rhizopod. The list is taken from Linsley’s, in Vol. XLyut of the Am. Journal of Science, and from Sanderson Smith’s list of the Mollusca of Long Island, in the Annals of the Lyceum of Natural History of New York, 1859. Some of the older names have been changed to those now in use. Dall.j 164 [November 10, Mr. W. H. Dall rade a few remarks upon the distribution of marine animals, asserting that their range was influenced more by the temperature of the water than by the depth or other conditions. He showed that the floating ice line of Bering Sea (which passes between the Pribyloff and St. Matthew groups of islands, touching the continent near Kuskoquim Bay), governed the distribution of the fish and mollusks of those waters. It is the northern limit of all the more southern forms, some of which range as far south as Monterey. It is the southern limit of almost all the truly arctic species. The fur seal is never found to the north of it, though often erroneously spoken of as coming from Bering Strait; the polar bear never passes to the south of this line; the cod invariably keep to the south, and the mullet to the north of it. It is also the limit of distribution of many fuci and seaside plants. Where the water is cooled by northern currents, or by glaciers, deep water species of mollusks, especially brachiopods, are found at, or even above low water mark. Where the surface water is warm, these mollusks, which in the north are found near the shore, are only obtained at a depth of many fathoms. The President gave notice that the first series of lectures for the season, entitled Sketches of Animal Life, would be given by Mr. Edward 8. Morse upon successive Monday evenings, commencing November 8th. Section of Microscopy. November 10, 1869. Mr. R. C. Greenleaf in the chair. Sixteen persons present. Dr. H. Hagen called the attention of the Section to the statements of Professor Listing of Géttingen, who had re- cently? given some suggestions concerning the further im- provement of the microscope. . 1 Nachr. d. kgl. Gesell. der Wissenseh., 1869, No. I, and Poggendorff’s Annalen, 1869, T. xvi, p. 467. 1869.] | 165 [Hagen. In all microscopes the dioptric arrangement is now analogous to the astronomic spy-glass; they have but one real image, from which the virtual image is formed and brought to the eye of the observer. Professor Listing proposes to have two real images, and in this way to form three successive augmentations instead of two, as be- fore. It is well known that by a prolongation of the draw tube, or by increasing the distance between the objective and the eye-piece, the image becomes successively greater, but the definition and pene- tration is by no means better. Professor Listing has made some ex- periments, and states that with an eye-piece of his construction (a double eye-piece with four lenses, similar to those of the terrrestrial spy-glasses) the magnifying power of the instrument, and also to nearly the same degree the penetration, is raised, by a tube of four hundred and twenty mill., 20, 28, 55, 97 and 137 per cent. (the lat- ter, of course, with diminution of the field), more than the same objective (Hartnack’s, No. 7) and eye-piece (No. 3) with a tube two hundred mill. in length. The object was Pleurosigma angulatum, and Professor Listing assures us that the latent power of the objective is developed by this means in an astonishing manner. He also remarked that the so called Erectors have long been used, but always with a low power and a short tube. The most advantageous form for the eye-piece would be, for the two superior glasses, achromatic lenses from fifteen to twenty mill. in diameter, and with a diaphragm be- tween, having an aperture of from eight to nine mill. For the two inferior lenses, a common Iuyghen’s eye-piece would be the best. Such a combined eye-picce, with a tube four hundred and twenty mill. long, would raise the power of the instrument ninety seven per cent. The use of an achromatic condenser adapted for oblique illumination is necessary for high powers. The experiment was only successfully made with the best objectives of English artists, or with the excellent new Hartnack objectives. According to his calculation, an objective of one mill. distance will give the first real image at a distance of two hundred mill. from the second chief point of the objective, and combined with an eye-piece in Listing’s manner, having a power of twenty-five diameters by itself, and a tube four hundred and fifty mill. long, the magnifying power _ of the whole instrument would be five thousand diameters. In the common arrangement of the microscope, the dioptric cardi- nal points are in the same order as in a concave lens, and the focal Hagen. | 166 [November 10, distance of the whole microscope (not of the objective) would be equal to — .5 mill., with a magnifying power of four hundred diam- eters for a visual distance of two hundred mill. In the Listing instrument the order of the cardinal points would be inverted and analogous to a convex lens, with a focal distance of the whole microscope equal to -++ .04 mill., with a magnifying power of five thousand diameters. Jn the first case the objective would have a focal distance of three mill.; in the last of one mill. The difference between the two chief points of the whole microscope is in both cases nearly equal to the whole length of the tube. In the last arrange- ment the whole microscope is analogous to a convex lens with very short focal distance. In a second paper Professor Listing gives further facts concerning this arrangement. An objective with a focal distance of one mill. (= gz), has the first image two hundred and one mill. distant from the second chief point. The first magnifying is = 200. The middle eye-piece of two achromatic lenses with twenty five mill. focal dis- tance, and fifteen mill. distance from each other, gives a focal dis- tance of eighteen mill., and so the second magnifying is = 9. This apparatus, having the objective and middle eye-piece combined with the five eye-pieces of Hartnack (magnifying from three and eight tenths to eleven diameters), gives a total power of from six thousand eight hundred and forty to nineteen thousand eight hundred diame- ters, with a tube of four hundred and forty mill. Professor Listing advises that the lenses of the eye-piece should be made of fifteen mill. diameter, and with a correction for their dis- tance. For the middle eye-piece, perhaps, lenses of quartz combined with a lower (1.61 to 1.59) flint glass should be used. In another place he gives a different construction for the middle eye-piece, analogous to an objective of two glasses, but with greater dimensions, and calculates the magnifying power of this to be from twenty two thousand to as much as twenty five thousand six hundred diameters. Professor Listing observes that only the penetrating power would be raised by this method of construction, but that to a very consid- erable degree. 1869.] 167 (Shaler. » November 17, 1869. The President in the chair. Thirty four persons present. Prof. N. S. Shaler presented the following paper: — Nore ON THE OCCURRENCE OF THE REMAINS OF TARANDUS RANGIFER GRAY, AT Bic Bone Lick In Kentucky. At a previous meeting of the Society, I presented the evidence going to support the conclusion that one of the large mammals of North America, the buffalo, had recently changed its limits, and had only ranged in the Ohio valley within the past few centuries. The same locality supplies us with evidence that the caribou existed in abundance in this river basin at a time anterior to the coming of the buffalo, and probably not very long after the disappearance of the Elephas primigenius. Since the coming of civilized man into Amer- ica, the caribou has been confined to a narrow area in the north- east part of the continent; it is questionable whether it has ever ranged during this time south of the southern limit of the State of Maine. The position in which these remains were found leaves the precise relationship in time of this species to the mammoths and mastodons a little questionable. There is, however, little doubt in my mind that, if not in existence during the later part of the time of these pachyderms, it came immediately after them. Its bones are found always below the line of the buffalo and the Virginia deer. The remains of this latter species are found only among the most recent deposits of the swamp. The disappearance from this region of this eminently boreal ani- mal immediately after the passing away of the ancient elephants from the Mississippi valley, goes to confirm a conclusion to which we are led by many other facts, viz., that the climatic change which closed the period of the mammoths was from cold to warmth, and not, as is generally assumed, an alteration of the reverse character. Mr. 8. H. Scudder exhibited a series of volumes which had just been bound for the library, containing the manuscripts and entomological memoranda left by the late Dr. T. W. Harris, and offered some remarks upon their peculiar value and interest. Scudder.] 168 [November 17, There are twenty four volumes in all, mostly folios. Four of them contain miscellaneous notes and descriptions of insects arranged according to primary groups, with frequent sketches of the pen and pencil ; a fifth is filled with his memoranda and drawings (many of them colored) of the earlier stages and metamorphoses of insects and particularly of Lepidoptera; entomological and zoological lectures delivered at Harvard College and elsewhere occupy two volumes ; the manuscript of a portion of the State Report on insects an eighth; two more are filled with lists of insects received or sent in exchange with his numerous correspondents; the eleventh contains several manuscript lists of the insects of Massachusetts, including the origi- nal of the last one published by the State; four more are occupied by letters from his correspondents and his replies to them — the basis of his recent posthumous work ; five are filled with laborious extracts from works then almost inaccessible, with tables and abstracts of classifications by various authors and with indices to the writings of Godart, Hiibner, Cramer, Fallén, Donovan, Ochsenheimer and many others; another, a large quarto, embraces a complete alphabetical index to the North American Coleoptera described by Say; and another, the original of published deseriptions of Neuroptera de- scribed by Say— partly in the handwriting of Say and partly as copied by Harris; a scrap-beok of his own contains a manuscript copy of his first list of the Insects of Massachusetts and memoranda of exchanges, all in the clearest hand-writing, together with extracts, newspaper clippings and other memoranda; in addition to these there is a volume with complete lists of the insects in his American cabinet, referring to numbers upon the insects, and several blank books par- tially filled with revised but incomplete lists of the American Insects in his collection. The Secretary announced that the Council, at its last meet- ting, had passed the following vote: — Voted: — That the net proceeds of the celebration of the centennial anniversary of the birth of Humboldt, together with the money received from the sale of Professor Agassiz’s Address, previous to Jan. 1, 1870, and the money subscribed at the solicitation of the Society’s committee, be given to the Trustees of the Museum of Comparative Zodlogy at Harvard College, in trust, for the establishment of an endowment, 1869.] 169 [Minot. - under the title of the Humboldt Scholarship, the income of which is to be solely applied, under the direction of the Fac- ulty, toward the maintenance of one or more young and needy persons, engaged in study at said Museum. Section of Entomology. November 24, 1869. Mr. Edward Burgess in the chair. Twelve persons present. The following paper was presented : — AMERICAN LEPIDOPTERA. JI. PuHatanipx Latr. By Cuaries S. Minot. At the June meeting of the section, I presented a paper entitled “American Lepidoptera, No. I,” which contained descriptions of four new Geometride (Phalenide Latr.), and was published without further introduction. I should now like to say a few words on the intended purport of the series. J propose that it shall contain any papers of a miscellaneous nature, which may aid in completing our knowledge of the natural history of the Lepidoptera; such as de- scriptions of new species, or of the metamorphoses and lists of insects found in particular localities or States, with their times of appear- ance, and perhaps ultimately anatomical communications. The de- scriptions of new species will, for the present, be principally, if not entirely, confined to the Phalenide. Cabenodes marginaria n. sp. é Al. ex., 2.20 inch. Pale ochraceous, with innumerable atoms. Above, a broad, fuscous, mar- ginal band, distinctly defined interiorly; cellular dots large, brown and very distinct. Beneath, a transverse, brunneous line, suffused exte- riorly, corresponding with the inner margin of the band of the upper surface; cellular dots distinct. Fringe narrow, ochraceo-fuscous. Abdomen, front and thorax, ochraceous. Palpi distinct, projecting beyond the head, parallel, reddish brown. Thorax woolly, patagia larger than is usual in the genus. Fore wings subfalcate, hind wings subeaudate. Wings and body have a silken gloss. This species is extremely interesting from the peculiar style of mark- Minot.] 170 [November 24, ing, which is unique, as far I know, in its genus. The only specimen I have seen was taken by myself near Muddy Pond, in West Rox- bury, Mass., in the middle of August, 1869. Cleora pulchraria n. sp. Al. ex., 1.50 inch. Light cinereous, marked with black. Above, primaries darker than secondaries, with two transverse dentate lines, dividing the wings, counting from the base, into the proportions of about 5:8:4, the inner line curving out- wards, and the outer recurved; a dash along the basal half of the costa. Secondaries, with outer line of primaries continued, curving outwards. Fringe alternated with black at the terminations of the nervures. Beneath, on both wings, markings of upper surface repeated faintly. Primaries with median nervure, and the terminal portions of the nervules covered with black scales. Diseal dots well defined above and beneath. Antenne broadly pectinated in the male, fili- form in the female, murinous. Eyes black, front gray, sometimes orange. ‘Thorax, legs and abdomen, cinereous. Middle legs with one, and hind legs with two pairs of tibial spurs; I have a male specimen, however, which has two pairs of spurs on the middle legs. This moth, which I have named the pretty Cleora, may be seen around Boston on the sunny days of September. It seems to be somewhat erratic in its appearance, for it comes out abundantly on some days, on others no specimens are to be seen. The only ones I have were given me by Mr. B. P. Mann of Cambridge. ‘There are specimens in the Society’s collection. Anisopteryx strigularia n.sp. AJ. ex., 1.60 inch. Murinous. ‘Above, pale murinous. Primaries with a darker shade along the costa, suffused over the anterior two-thirds of the wing; innumerable minute strigule and three more or less suffused whitish spots on the costal margin, the outmost tending to become a transverse fascia. Secondaries without markings, nearly uniform in tint. Beneath, primaries with spots of upper surface repeated; a subapical patch of white, marked with transverse black strigule, which extend along the costal border to the base of the wing, and along the outer nearly to the posterior margin. Secondaries whitish, with fuliginous blotches and transverse strigule, which, being more numerous in some places than in others, give the wing a moss-like appearance; there is a trans- verse fascia, obliterated in the middle of the wings, but near each mar- gin rendered distinct by the strigula which run somewhat together along the outer edge, producing dark blotches, the anterior of which is much the largest. Fringe white, alternated with black hairs at the 1869.] 171 [Minot. terminations of the nervures, except on the secondaries above. An- tenn filiform, brown. Head, eyes and thorax, blackish brown; abdomen above mouse-color, beneath, like the hind wings; femur murinous; tibia black and white. Hind tibia with two pairs of spurs. This species is remarkable for imitating the markings of the rhopal- ocerous genus, Chionobas, which occurs in the same locality. If we follow Darwin, this fact may be explained by supposing that the pecu- liar moss-like markings serve to protect it from its foes by its close resemblance to the bare or lichen-covered rocks among which it is found. Iam indebted to the kindness of Mr. Sanborn for specimens of this interesting Geometer. His specimens were, I believe, all taken in August, on the sides, and near the summit of Mount Washington. I do not know of its being found in any other locality. Some of the specimens were taken in a maple grove. One point is worthy of no- tice: that where Chionobas has a white band on the secondaries, this Anisopteryz has a dark one. Fidonia Faxonii Minot. The male of this species may be dis- tinguished by the entire absence of the white markings of the female. This species appears in August and September, not coming out until the very last of the former month. My remarks on its appearance and abundance apply to Fidonia bicoloraria Minot, but not to £. Fazoni. Mr. W. H. Dall remarked that while passing over the Portage to the Yukon River, in Alaska, when the tempera- ture was below zero of Fahrenheit, he shot a Canada jay, which had in its mouth the caterpillar of an Arctian; after- wards, when the thermometer was sixteen degrees below zero, he found one of the same caterpillars crawling upon the snow. On the middle of the frozen river, whenever the sun shone for a short time upon the crust, he saw upon the snow a species of Lepisma or Podura in great abundance, although the cold was intense. The caterpillar of Vanessa Antiopa was twice noticed alive during the winter, and the perfect insect was seen at Nulato, May 20th, when the nightly tem- perature was below freezing. Jackson. ] 172 {December 8, December 3, 1869. The President in the chair, Sixteen persons present. Dr. C. T. Jackson presented, in the name of Mr. Daniel McCain, specimens of native carbonate of magnesia from Greece, California, Maryland and Iansas. That from Greece contains ninety nine per cent. of pure carbonate of magnesia, the rest, or one per cent , being siliceous matter. The California specimen came from Alameda County, thirty six miles from San Francisco. It is of the same degree of purity as that from Greece. The Maryland sample is rich enough for use, and contains seventy nine and two tenths per cent. of carbonate of magnesia. The Kansas sample is very poor, containing but eight per cent. of carbonate of magnesia. These minerals are used by the Union Stone Company in making calcined magnesia, which is one of the ingredients of their artifi- cial stone, serving, when combined with chloride of magnesium, as the binding material. Dr. Jackson gave a, detailed account of the method of making the artificial stones, and of casting bas reliefs, busts and ornamental mouldings. He said the processes had been so improved that now artificial grindstones made of quartz-sand and of emery, had been constructed, which were as solid and durable as any natural stone. The emery wheels made of these materials are vastly better than those made with a paste of vulcanized india rubber, since they do not glaze, but wear away in such a manner as to always expose fresh particles of emery. He regarded this new manufacture as of great value for architecture and the mechanic arts, and as showing the importance of the mineral native carbonate of magnesia, which had been before used only for the manufacture of epsom salts, of which a limited supply only is wanted. Professor N. 8. Shaler offered some remarks on the rela- tions of the rocks in the vicinity of Boston, of which the following is an abstract : — The association of the several different sets of beds which are ex- posed in the neighborhood of Boston, is very difficult to determine 1869.] : 173 [Shaler. satisfactorily; being nearly destitute of fossils, and extremely compli- cated by disturbances, they have not presented a very inviting field for research. They have consequently received, as yet, very little attention. I-venture to offer here a few suggestions concerning their relations, which may serve as a basis for future communications, and for the study of those who may have the desire to examine the same field. rf There can be no doubt that the syenites, which make up so large a part of the exposed rocks of Eastern Massachusetts, are the oldest materials found in this region. The best exhibition of them, showing at once their general character and their relation to the superincum- bent beds, is found in the immediate vicinity of Quincy, Mass. The extensive quarries of that neighborhood enable us to see very well all the different conditions of occurrence of this rock. The most re- markable fact which has come under my observation is the exist- ence of planes of separation in this syenite, which cannot be referred to joints. The three or more planes of joint cleavings observable in these beds are clearly separable from this other set of planes which I cannot refer to any other cause than stratification, despite the opinion still generally entertained, that these rocks are of igneous origin, and owe their present structure to the actions which go on in a mass in a condition of igneous fluidity.2. That Iam not mistaken in referring these fractures to bedding, is, I believe, abundantly proven by the details of structure of the syenite itself. as well as by the re- lations it bears to the unquestionably stratified rocks which rest upon it. These planes in question show none of the characters which are presented by the true joint planes and fault’s planes. There are no slickensides. They are only imperfectly parallel, and of very varying thickness. There are visible on the surface of considerable shects of this rock, laid bare in the Mitchell quarry near Quincy, splitting along what I believe to be the plane of stratification, markings in- distinguishable in appearance from ripple marks. This observation was made upon quite a small surface, so that it alone could hardly be trusted to determine the nature of these rocks. But upon the sides and the summit of the syenite, at various points, we find other evi- 1 The admirable researches of Dr. T. Sterry Hunt into the constitution and origin of granite and syenites, have made it possible for the student to approach the question of the origin of rocks of these groups with a better chance of ascer- taining the truth than would have been possible before the publication of the results obtained by them. Shaler.] 1 14 S [December 8, dence of their sedimentary character. If these syenites were of igneous origin, if they had been poured out before the deposition of the adja- cent stratified beds, or thrust through them in a state of fusion, we should expect to find the usual marks of such actions. ‘In the first of these cases the later sedimentary deposits would be found lying uncon- formably upon the syenite without any indication of transition; in the second we should expect to find a clear line ef contact between the syenite and the sedimentary rocks, such as is always to be found where an intrusive mass of trappean matter cuts more ancient rocks. What we do find is that the imperfect bedding of the deeper portions of the syenite becomes more and more clearly defined as we pass towards the exterior of the mass, and gradually passes into unques- tionably sedimentary rock. Every stage of this transition is not clearly seen, but enough is visible to satisfy any one that it really exists. The first rocks, of quite unquestionable stratified origin, lie di- rectly to the north of the Quincy syenite hills, and consist of clearly bedded sandstones, approaching quartzites in their charaeter. These rocks have an unknown thickness, probably amounting to several hundred feet. Their general dip is northerly, with a varia- ble angle of inclination which may be roughly averaged at twenty de- grees. Above thei the section is hidden for a distance which would give space for about three hundred feet of beds. tunning the same north course across the break, we come upon the lowest of the Brain- tree series. This part of our section has a total thickness of about two hundred feet; its dip corresponds with the general inclination ob- servable in the supposed stratification of the syenite, as weil as that of the quartzites immediately above it. The whole of this Braintree series is fossiliferous, although it is only in about one hundred feet of the upper part that well preserved specimens of the characteristic fossils are found. It is composed of beds which were evidently at the time of their formation very uniform mud of a sea floor tolerably remote from land; and although much changed by metamorphic action, it is easily perceived that the whole set of beds contains no trace of shore deposits. Immediately beyond the exposure of the Braintree beds at Hayward’s Landing, a dislocation has brought the thin bedded quartzites again to the surface. The alteration in these is so great that the rock has assumed something of the appearance of gneiss, and would by some be classed in that group of rocks. If there be no undiscovered faults in the seetion from the Quincy 1869.) 175 [Shaler. hills across the Braintree rocks in a northeasterly direction, the total thickness of unquestionably stratified beds is not far from one thou- sand feet. The uniform dip away from the Quincy Hills, shown by all the stratified beds on their flanks, may be regarded as sufficient proof that their elevation came after the deposition of these beds. The region about the Quincy Hills does not afford any sufficient evidence concerning the section above the line of the Braintree series. At Weymouth Landing there is a great mass of schistose rocks which certainly are not far removed from this part of the section, but I have not yet succeeded in tracing any connection with it. J am inclined to think that they may be the beds between the Braintree slates and the quartzites before described. In addition to the rocks already mentioned, there exist two other sets of beds, which are extremely developed in the environs of Boston, the relations of which are not easily determined. ‘These are the series of the Roxbury conglomerate, and the set of beds which I have chosen to term from the point where they are seen to the best advantage, the Cambridge slates. The first of these consists of a mass of stratified pebbles, with intercalated sandstones and erits, the whole capped by a series of ripple marked sandstones about one hundred feet in thickness, and at certain points overlaid by masses of amygdaloidal trap. . The total thickness of the forma- tion remains yet a matter of question, but it cannot be less than twelve hundred to two thousand feet, and may be twice the latter amount. The whole is evidently a shallow water and shore de- posit, being formed in a sea which became progressively more and more shallow, the uppermost beds affording evidence that they were deposited very near the shore. The Cambridge slates show by their structure that they, like the _ Braintree slates, were deposited in deep water. In general character they resemble the latter rocks, bemg of dense argillaceous material, with little admixture of foreign substances, and presenting numerous planes of jointing, and one distinct cleavage along the line of strati- fication. The aggregate thickness disclosed in the Cambridge and Somerville sections is not far from two hundred feet; though owing to the fact that neither the base nor summit of the beds is observ- able, it is impossible to determine their depth. The only clear evidence of organic life consists in numerous but indistinct impres- sions of fucoids. A number of other peculiar forms have been found, but nothing satisfactory has yet been ascertained concerning them. Ree Shaler.] 176 [December 8, After several years of searching I have succeeded in finding a sec- tion which shows pretty clearly the relation of the Cambridge slates and Roxbury conglomerate. The most important part of this exposure has been uncovered by the extensive excavations now being made in the construction of the Chestnut Hill reservoir. In passing from the southern side of this reservoir in a nearly due north direction, we cross what seems to be a complete section of the slates and conglom- erates of these two series of beds. On the south border of the lower reservoir at Chestnut [Hill there is an outcrop of rocks in all impor- tant respects closely resembling the Cambridge slates. These are traceable for a distance of about seven hundred feet in a northerly direction across the floor of the reservoir, having a nearly north dip at an angle of about fifteen degrees. Immediately above these and without any discordance comes the first of the conglomerate beds, which consists of a bed about ten feet thick of pebbles mingled with slates. ‘This is surmounted by about thirty feet of slates having a most perfect cleavage in the plane of stratification. It is not difficult to split a sheet a foot square having a thickness of not over one twentieth of an inch. Immediately above this slate, which was evi- dently deposited in deep water, for it is remarkably uniform in its character, the conglomerate comes in again and continues with its northern dip at an average angle of about fifteen degrees for a hori- zontal distance of over a mile. Near the edge of the Charles River alluvial flats, in Brighton, this conglomerate changes suddenly into a sandstone which is throughout marked with very distinct ripple lines, and bears other evidence of shallow water origin. Above this sand- stone mass there comes a great expanse of amygdaloidal trap, which at some points is seen cutting the sandstone and again appears to have been poured out over its surface as a contemporaneous sheet. As is often the case near great outbreaks of this kind, there are at least two faults, one on either side of the dyke, which have produced considerable dislocation in the beds. These are the only faults visible in this most interesting section. Although it is by no means certain as yet, still it may be assumed ~ as probable that the Cambridge slates and Roxbury conglomerate belong to the same great series of beds. The coincidence in the di- rection of dip as well as the general character of the beds themselves - renders it probable that it may eventually be found that these slates and conglomerates form part of the same series of beds as the Brain- tree series, and all belong to the primordial era. I am assured by 1869.] Li7T {Jacksou, my friend, Rev. J. B. Perry, Assistant at the Museum in Cambridge that these conglomerates closely resemble beds of this age in New Hampshire, though I do not know that he agrees with me in this opinion concerning their age. As Mr. Perry’s acquaintance with the primordial rocks of North America is more thorough than that of any living geologist, we may hope from him some satisfactory ex- planation concerning the precise position of these beds. No fossils have as yet been found in the conglomerate; careful search may yet reveal something, however. It is to chance fossils and to a careful study of the character of the pebbles composing the con- glomerate, that we must look for a solution of this question of the time of formation and conditions of deposition of this mass of beds. Dr. Charles T. Jackson asked Mr. Shaler whether he considered greenstone porphyry to be a rock of igneous or aqueous origin. Mr. Shaler said he regarded it as igneous. Dr. Jackson then said there was an insensible passage of syenite into greenstone porphyry, as may be seen in numerous localities in Cohasset and elsewhere, and if one of these rocks is of igneous origin, the other must be also, of course. He then entered into an analysis of Mr. Shaler’s arguments, and said that the obscurely stratified rocks on the borders of the great mass of syenite at Quincy, proved the igneous influence of the erupted syenite upon the upturned strata which it had elevated by its protrusion. It is very common to find numerous fragments of stratified rocks through which syenite or granite has been protruded, mixed with the mass of injected rock. He had recorded a great number of such eases in his State Geological Reports; and Prof. Hitchcock had also observed them. Now these torn up fragments appear to be imbedded in the masses of syenite or granite, exactly as they are in trap and lava dykes, which burst through stratified rocks, and bear up the broken pieces imbedded in their paste, and there is every analogy between greenstone trap rocks, porphyries, syenites and granites, indicating . for them all a formation by igneous fusion and elevation from below. He did not deny the powerful influence of super-heated water on these igneous rocks, and referred to the researches of M. A. Daubrée on the formation of crystallized minerals in super-heated and strongly compressed water; but the water, in aiding metamorphosis of min- erals, was only a helping agent; fire was the chief cause of the changes. (See Scrope on Volcanic Phenomena, and Daubrée’s Work PROCEEDINGS B. S. N. A.—VOL. NII. 12 JANUARY, 1870. Allen.} 178 [December 15, on Metamorphism.) He would ask Mr. Shaler what his syenite was made of? What sediments were thus so strangely metamorphosed into a crystalline salt, like feldspar, the chief ingredient of syenite rocks? Was it an ordinary sandy sediment? If so, whence did it derive its potash and soda, twenty five pounds of which enter into the composition of every cubic foot of syenite. And again, why do we not see some unaltered grains, some coarse, unchanged gravel in syenites? Nothing of the sort is ever seen, but, on the contrary, clearly defined crystallized feldspar, mixed with distinct crystals of hornblende and a little quartz; all of which seem to have crystallized ‘ at a single jet from a stiff pasty mass which showed no subsidence of separate crystals or of intermixed gravel. Dr. Jackson also said that when it is alleged that crystallized rocks, like syenite or granite, are altered sedimentary rocks of aqueous origin, we require that the passage state should be demonstrated, and this has never been done by any one who has advocated such a metamorphosis. From Nova Scotia to Georgia, and from the Atlantic to the Pacific coasts, all granites and syenites bear unequivocal evidence of their igneous origin and elevation through the superincumbent strata. It is too late to revive the old doctrines of Werner, for the same evi- dence with which Hutton overthrew that theory, still exists in the localities pointed out by the eminent Scotch geologist,’ and similar evidence may be seen in almost any part of New England. December 15, 1869. The President in the chair. Thirty persons present. The following paper was presented : — NoTES ON THE MAMMALS OF Towa. ByJ. A. ALLEN. The present list of the mammals of Iowa is based mainly upon notes gathered during three months spent in that State in the summer of 1867, for the purpose of collecting and studying its animals and plants. It seeming desirable to make the list a complete one, a few 1 See Playfair’s illustrations of the Huttonian theory for descriptions of Euro- pean localities. : 1869.] 179 [ Allen. species have been inserted upon the authority of other authors,! while a few others are given from their known occurrence in nearly all the adjoining States, though not to my knowledge yet reported from this. The whole number enumerated is forty eight, and probably but two or three remain to be added to perfect the list of the indigenous mam- mals of the State. Attention is also called to such others as are most likely to occur. If three or four northern ones be found to reach the northern parts of the State, the whole number, including the intro- duced house rats and mice, may be increased to about fifty five or fifty six, which is a number somewhat greater than is found in any of the Atlantic States, excluding the marine species, the seals and cetaceans. 3 Through the kindness of Dr. C. A. White, the able Director of the present Geological Survey of lowa,—to whom, and to his excellent assistant, Mr. Orestes H. St. John, I am greatly indebted for assist- ance,—I was enabled to pass a considerable part of this time with one of his exploring parties, and to traverse large portions of nine counties.2 These are situated a little to the southwest of the centre of the State, and embrace an area nearly sixty miles square; and to this region most of my special remarks refer. Large portions of this tract were then in a nearly primitive condition, many of its broad prairies being still undisturbed by the plow. Yet the hunter and the “first settler” had passed over it and destroyed or driven away many of the larger mammals. But the recent presence of these animals here was still fresh in the minds of the older settlers, many of whom had witnessed and assisted in their rapid extirpation. _ Iowa being situated in a prairie region, it necessarily differs con- siderably in the general character of its fauna, and especially in re- spect to its mammalia, from that of the wooded portion of the United States to the eastward, as all who have given attention to the geo- graphical distribution of animals must be aware. Yet we do not in this State fairly enter upon the so-called Middle Province of the con- 1 The works to which I am chiefly indebted are the admirable volumes of Profes- sor Spencer F. Baird, on the Mammals of North America, Audubon and Bach- man’s ‘‘Quadrupeds of North America,” the late Major Robert Kennicott’s papers on the Mammals cf Northern Illinois (See Patent Office Reports, Agricul- _ ture, for 1856 and 1857, and Transactions of the Illinois State Agricultural Society, Vol. 1, 1853-1854, p. 580), and Dr. F. V. Hayden’s valuable article on the ‘‘ Geology and Natural History of the Upper Missouri,” published in the Transactions of the American Philosophical Society (Vol. x11, 2d series). 2 Dallas, Guthrie, Boone, Greene, Carroll, Crawford, Sac, Calhoun and Audubon. Allen.] 180 {December 15, tinent, which differs so markedly, both in faunal and floral, from the Eastern Province. A great change in the fauna and flora is met with, however, at the point of junction of the wooded and woodless regions of the eastern half of the continent, which in the latitude of Iowa occurs more than a hundred miles to the eastward of that State. At this point as great and as abrupt a change occurs as usually takes place between two contiguous faunal districts, one of which lies to the north or to the south of the other, or where the line of division is an isothermal one,separating different climatic and zoological zones. A few only, if any, of the species embraced in this list seem to find their eastern limit of distribution in this State; but, with two or three exceptions, they range through southern Wisconsin, Illinois, and even into northwestern Indiana and southern Michigan, or to the eastern limit of the prairies. Also, with very few exceptions, none are re- stricted to it in either their northward or southward range. A few of the more northern species, whose southern range is restricted to the southern border of the Alleghanian fauna, may reach the northern counties of Iowa, as a few essentially southern species may approach, or even be found occasionally within its southern borders. Jowa is hence mainly embraced within the Carolinian fauna, at least so far as its mammals, birds and reptiles are concerned, though generally heretofore supposed to belong, in great part, at least, to the Allegha- nian. Among the strictly prairie mammals represented, are at least four rodents (Spermophilus tridecem-lineatus, S. Franklinii, Geomys bursarius, Hesperomys michiganensis), two carnivores (Canis latrans, Taxidea americana), and at least one insectivore (Scalops argentatus). Only one eastern species, the red squirrel (Sczurus hudsonius), ap- pears to find at the prairie line its western limit, if, as some have supposed, it be true that this animal does not range across the conti- nent.!_ Hence the difference between the mammalian fauna of the prairies of the Upper Mississippi valley and that of the forest region to the eastward consists in the addition of a number of species pecu- liar to the prairies. Since all the larger species of mammalia are everywhere rapidly disappearing before the revolutionizing influences of civilization, and since great and general changes occur in the faunal and floral features of every country when brought under cultivation, it becomes a mat- ter of unusual interest to.preserve as correct a record as possible of the primitive conditions of our own country in this respect, for cém- 1 See postea, p. 188. 1869.) 181 { Allen; parison with its subsequent altered status, as well as a history of the change. The natural history of Iowa is of course now far from an unexplored field, yet I find that no adequate record of its animals and plants, nor of those of the country immediately adjoining, has as yet been made. Ihave hence no hesitancy in presenting the few notes that follow concerning some of the mammals of this State. FELIDZ. Two species of this family, from their known distribution, undoubt- edly occur in portions of the State, but they cannot now be, and probably never were, very numerous. I met, however, with no evi- dences of their existence, and failed to make special inquiries concern- ing them. They are the following: ‘1. Felis concolor Linnzus.t (Panther.) 2. Lynx rufus Rafinesque. (Bay Lynx.) The L. canadensis may also occur in the northern parts of the State. The F’. concolor, however, owing to the open character of the country, can occur only as a straggler from more wooded regions.* CANIDZ. 3. Canis lupus Linn. (Common Wolf.) Although wolves of this species were rather common less than twenty years since, they are now scarce, especially in the more set- tled districts. They are usually termed “ mountain ” wolves, in dis- tinction from the prairie wolves. 4. Canis latrans Say. (Prairie Wolf.) This species was formerly quite numerous, much more so even than the common wolf (C. lupus), but now, like that species, it is already in some sections nearly extirpated. I was informed that it was still common in the southern part of Guthrie county, where it not unfre- quently was destructive to the lambs. It is said to far exceed the 1 The nomenclature employed in this list is the same as that adopted by me re- cently in my “‘ Catalogue of the Mammals of Massachusetts,’’ so far as the species are the same. See Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoélogy, No. vill, - October, 1869. 2 Since writing the above, I have received from Dr. C. A. White, in kind re- sponse to recent inquiries of mine concerning the species of this family found in Iowa, as follows: ‘‘ The panther has been known within our limits but very rarely. The common wild eat, or bay lynx, is occasionally found, but it is considered rare game. I do not know that the Canada lynx has ever been seen in Iowa.” Allen.] 182 [December 15, common fox in boldness and cunning. In the Proceedings of the Philadelphia Academy of Natural Sciences (Vol. 1, p. 188, 1842), it is stated that a specimen of this species, from Illinois, was presented to the Academy by Dr. Blanding. Mr. Kennicott states that it was once common in northern Illinois. 5. Vulpes vulgaris Fleming! (Red Fox.) Not apparently numerous in the counties in question, particularly ‘ at the southward. About Wall Lake and northwards they were re- ported to be common.? 6. Vulpes velox Aud. and Bach. (Swift Fox.) Vulpes cinereo-argentatus Richardson, Faun. Bor. Am., I, 98, 1829; nec Canis cinereo-argenteus Erxleben, Syst. Regn. Animalis, 1777. An animal described to me as the “ Swift,” which occurs here more or less frequently, is undoubtedly this species, though I have not known it before reported as occurring east of the Missouri. The character of the country in western Iowa differs little from that of eastern Nebraska, where this species is well known to occur. It is hence not very unexpected that it should exist in portions of Iowa. Dr. Richardson says it ranges north to the Saskatchewan river, which he gives as its northern limit. 7. Vulpes virginianus Rich. (Gray Fox.) Canis cinereo-argenteus et virginianus Erxleben, Syst. Regn. Anim., 567, 1777. Frequent, but not especially numerous. 1¥or a recent discussion of the relationship of the so-called V. fulvus with the V. vulgaris of the Old World, see the Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, No. viil, p. 159. 2] may here add that in Van Buren and Allegan counties in Michigan, four kinds of foxes are recognized by the hunters: the ‘‘cross,’’ the “ Samson,” the ‘‘com- mon red,” and the “‘gray.’’ The latter is undoubtedly the southern gray fox (V. virginianus), and the others different varieties of the common red fox. The ““cross,’’ so called, is much the rarer, and the red by far the most common. About one third of all taken are of the second variety, which from the very peculiar ap- pearance of their fur are termed ‘‘Samson”’ foxes. They are described as having a coarse, crisp, woolly fur, appearing much as though they had been singed; hence their name of ‘‘Samson foxes.’’ Their skins bring much less in market than those of the common red fox, while the animal is represented as less cunning and more easily trapped: they also have slightly different habits. I regreté that I had no opportunity of examining specimens of them myself. Similar foxes, I am in- formed, occur in Massachusetts, where they are known to fox-hunters by the same singular name. This peculiar condition of the pelage is doubtless unnatural, and probably the result of disease, as I have in several instances seen an apparently similar modification of the pelage in the red squirrel (.Sciurus hudsonius), which in one case extended through a whole litter. 1869.] 183 [Allen. MUSTELIDZ. 8. Putorius ermineus Linn.! (Weasel.) Weasels, probably mostly of this species, were reported to me as common; I saw, however, but one. 9. Putorius vulgaris Linn. (Little Weasel.) From its kpown general range, this species must also occur more or less frequently, especially in the northern parts of the State. 10. Putorius lutreolus Cuvier. (Mink.) P. vison Gapper, and P. nigrescens Aud. and Bach.? Said to be common. The minks of the prairies are quite different in some respects from the more northern animal, as well as from those of the wooded region to the eastward. They are browner and their fur is much coarser and brings a much lower price in the market. Experienced trappers and fur dealers at the West repeatedly informed me that these differences are so considerable that they can always readily separate the prairie skins from the forest ones, as those from Illinois, for example, from those taken in Michigan. They also claim that there are two kinds of prairie mink, as of the northern mink, differing in size. This difference probably depends mainly upon sex and age, the males being much larger than the females. 11. Lutra canadensis Sabine. (Otter.) Said to be common on the Raccoon rivers, and generally more or less so throughout the State. 12. Mephitis mephitica Baird. (Skunk.) Common, and presents the same varieties in point of color as at the East. 13. Taxidea americana Waterhouse. (American Badger.) This species is probably nearly as numerous as formerly. Though rarely seen, it being nocturnal, its burrows are frequently met with. Tts thick, heavy body and short legs render it a rather clumsy animal, but with stealthy, cat-like habits it combines considerable cunning. In the night many expert animals become its prey. It is very power- ful, and being armed with strong claws and teeth, is able to offer formidable resistance when attacked by a dog; it is, however, ex- 1In the Builetin of the Museum of Comparative Zodlogy (No. vii1, pp. 168-174, 1869), the writer has given his reasons for believing there are but two species of weasel in the United States east of the Missouri, and that these are identical re- spectively with the P. ermineus and P. vulgaris of the Old World. 2In respect to the supposed distinctness of the American from the Old World minks, see my remarks in Bull. Mus. Comp. Zodl., No. vitl, p. 175. Allen.] 184 [December 15, tremely docile to man, allowing itself to be handled, and unless teased, is said to rarely offer to scratch or bite. At Rippey, in Greene county, I saw a half grown one in confinement that had been caught by a boy a few days before, and carried home by him in his arms. When discovered they are said to lie flat and motionless on the ground, and if they think they are not seen will allow a person to pass within a few feet of them without moving. Though generally regarded as a harmless animal by the farmers, the bones and wool of lambs have been found in their burrows.? URSIDZ. 14. Procyon lotor Storr. (Raccoon.) Common. 15. Ursus arctos Linn. (Bear.) The bear is reported to occur here, but I learned nothing of special interest respecting it. From the character of the country it evi- dently cannot now be common, however numerous it may form- erly have been. Localities named after the bear, as Bear creeks, Bear groves, etc., indicate its former greater or less abundance here. CERVIDZ. 16. Cervus canadensis Erxl. (American Elk.) Formerly numerous, but now extinct in most of the region under description. It is but a few years since good antlers of this species were common on the prairies, but through the combined action of 1The Mexican Badger (Taxidea Berlandiert Baird, U. S. and Mex. Bound. Sur. Rep., If, Mammals, 21, 1859; Taxidea Berlandieri Baird, Mam. N. Amer., 205), described as ‘‘ Similar to the 7. americana [{labradoria], but smaller; above reddish gray, with a narrow white stripe extending from the muzzle to the root of the tail,’ from skulls of Mexican specimens and the mss, notes of Dr. Berlan- dier, seems to be merely the smaller southern race of the common 7. americana. It differs from it chiefly in being a little smaller, and, according to some reports, lighter in color. The probability seems very great that the slight differences in golor pointed out are merely individual differences, although the 7. Berlandieri may constitute a more or less well-marked climatal race. 2 In the eighth number of the Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zodlogy, the writer has shown that it is impossible to satisfactorily characterize or distin- guish more than a single species of land bearin the colder portion of the Northern Hemisphere, though it must be admitted that between the extremes of variation there are very great differences, more than would be required even to indicate 3 diversity of species, if the differences were constant, as they are most notably not, the most distinet forms gradually intergrading. 1869.} 185 [ Allen. two destroying agencies they are now rarely met with, and only in an imperfect condition. In addition to the injury done them by the fires that annually pass over the wild prairies, the two species of Spermophilus and other rodents eat them, by which animals they are said to be in a short time completely devoured. An old resident and hunter whom I met at New Jefferson, in Greene county, informed me that but seven years before (now nine years since), the elk were abundant in some parts of that county. Prior to this date he used to see herds nearly every day, and some- times several in a day, some of them of very large size. During the early settlement of this part of Iowa they were of great value to the settlers, furnishing them with an abundance of excellent food when there was a scarcity of swine and other meat-yielding domestic animals. But, as has been the case too often in the history of the noblest game animals of this continent, they were frequently most ruthlessly and improvidently destroyed. In the severer weather of winter they were often driven to seek shelter and food in the vicinity of the settlements. At such times the people, not satisfied with kill- ing enough for their present need, mercilessly engaged in an exter- minating butchery. Rendered bold by their extremity, the elk were easily dispatched with such implements as axes and corn-knives. _ For years they were so numerous that the settlers could kill them whenever they desired to, but several severe winters and indiscrim- inate slaughter soon greatly reduced their numbers, and now only a few linger where formerly thousands lived, and these are rapidly dis- _ appearing. Their home here being chiefly the open country, they much sooner fall a prey to the “ westward march of civilization,” through the most merciless treatment they receive at the hands of the emigrant, than does the deer. From June to Ociober the elk are said to be always fat and in excellent condition for the table. Their flesh is described as being in texture intermediate between beef and mutton, but superior in flavor to either. In March the bucks shed their horns. As the new ones begin to sprout they leave the herd and keep by themselves, in small parties of about a dozen, till their horns are fully grown and hard, when they begin to “run,” as the hunters term it, and again join the herd. About the twentieth of June the females are said to bring forth their young. Towards autumn, when the calves have become large and strong, the elk begin to gather in large herds. The horns appear disproportionately large, especially when “in the . velvet,” at Allen.) 186 [December 15, Whici time the main branches are as thick as one’s arm, and their appearance is far from pleasing. 17. Cervus virginianus Boddert. (Common deer.) More or less common, but steadily decreasing in numbers. I was informed that in some sections they were on the increase, owing to the fact that they were beginning to have a more favorable range, through the gradual extension of the forests, due to the protec- tion of the woodlands from the annual fires that formerly swept over the country, and which probably more than any other cause tended to keep the timber-tracts within their former restricted areas. But it does not seem that this increase of the deer can be more than temporary, unless stringent measures are taken to protect them. If exposed to the indiscriminate slaughter to which this ani- mal has generally been subject elsewhere, it must certainly soon dis- appear, as it has already done over so large a portion of the United States east of the Mississippi. The white-tailed deer (C. leucurus), according to Dr. Hayden, should be included among the mammals of Iowa, since he gives its range as extending eastward to the Big Sioux river and Council Bluffs. It does not, however, seem to me to be distinct from the C. virginianus. BOVIDZ. 18. Bos americanus Gmelin. (American Buffalo.) Now nearly exterminated in all parts of the State, though numer- ous in the northwestern counties at a comparatively recent date. Two years since I was informed that. a few still remained in that sec- tion, and that up to that time one or more had been killed every year as far south as Greene county. Further north they were represented as being more common, but that no lierds were met with south of the Sioux river, and rarely east of the Missouri. Those found further east were only stragglers or wanderers from the herds, that in most cases had probably been driven off by the Indians. VESPERTILIONIDZ. Bats of at least two species were observed flying about the groves, but I procured no specimens. They were not, however, numerous, and were mainly seen near the timber. A prairie country cannot, 1 Transact. Amer. Phil. Soc., Vol. x11, 2d series. p. 149. 1869.] 137 (Allen. evidently, afford such animals favorable haunts; but they will doubt- less increase with the further settlement of the country, when more or less open buildings will afford them convenient places of resort. The following species, from their general known distribution, doubt- less occur in most parts of the State. 19. Nycticejus crepuscularis H. Allen. (Black-faced Bat.) 20. Lasiurus noveboracensis Tomes. (Red Bat.) 21. Lasiurus cinereus H. Allen.’ (Hoary Bat.) 22. Scotophilus fuscus H. Allen. (Brown Bat.) 23. Scotophilus noctivagans H. Allen. (Silvery Bat.) 24. Scotophilus georgianus H. Allen. (Georgia Bat.) 25. Vespertilio subulatus Say. (Little Brown Bat.) SORECIDZE. During the short time I passed in this State I met with no examples of this family, though several species undoubtedly occur there. Of the long-tailed shrews, or true Sorices, among the species that may be looked for are Sorex platyrhinus, S. Richardsonii, S. “Haydeni,” and S. “Hoy.” The following, from their ascertained distribution, must be present, specimens of the latter being in fact already known from this State. 26. Sorex Cooperi Bachman. (Cooper’s Shrew.) 27. Blarina brevicauda Baird. (Mole Shrew.) TALPIDA. 28. Scalops argentatus Bachman. (Silvery Mole.) This species ig well known to occur in the State, but it does not appear to be very numerous. 29. Condylura cristata Illiger. (Star-nosed Mole.) This species having been traced westward to the Mississippi, it doubtless occurs in eastern Iowa, but probably only as a rather rare species. I can find, however, no specimens of it reported from there. It is said to inhabit the prairies of Illinois. The Brewer’s Mole (Scalops Breweri) may also be met with here, though it has not yet been found, so far as I am aware, west of the State of Ohio. 1 Probably not distinct from ZL. noveboracensis. 2 Kennicott, Patent Office Rep., Agr., 1857, p. 101. Allen.} ? 188 [December 15, SCIURIDZ. 30. Sciurus carolinensis Gmelin. (Gray Squirrel.) Said to be more or less numerous in the groves along the water courses. I saw, however, but very few. 31. Sciurus ludovicianus Custis. (Western Fox Squirrel.) Common in the same situations as the preceding species; I saw it much more frequently. It was, however, far less numerous than I found it to be in Ogle county, Illinois, or in southern Michigan, in both of which localities there was a much greater predominance of forest. In these latter localities the preceding (S. carolinensis) was also ex- cessively abundant, both in its black and gray colors, and in every intermediate stage between gray and black. The young, as I have already mentioned in another connection,’ more frequently represent the intermediate stage, their fur presenting the annulated appearance mentioned by Prof. Baird as characterizing intermediate color varie- ties? This form of S. carolinensis was more especially abundant in Illinois, where the greater part of the large number of specimens I examined were of the dusky, annulate-haired type; they were also all young. 82. Sciurus hudsonius Pallas. (Chickare. Red Squirrel.) This species does not appear to occur in the parts of Iowa I visited. I saw not a single specimen, and although I made extended inquiries respecting it, could not learn that it had ever been seen here. I also found it unknown in Ogle county, Illinois (one hundred miles west from Chicago), though said to occur sparingly in some portions of northern Illinois, by Mr. R. Kennicott, and also in northern Mis- souri and central Iowa; but in respect to the latter locality I think he may have been mistaken. I never anywhere, however, saw it so numerous as I have found it to be in southern Michigan (Van Buren and Allegan counties). Somewhat to the northward of Iowa, as in the forest region of Minnesota, it is said to be very numerous, and to extend thence far to the westward. Dr. Hayden says it occurs on the eastern side of the Black Hills, in Nebraska.* 1 Bulletin Mus. Comp. Zodlogy, No. vill, p. 222. ? Mammals of North America, p. 244. 3 Patent Office Rep. Agriculture, 1856, p. 68. 4I am far from sure that either of the supposed species called Sciurus Fremonti, S. Richardsoni and S. Douglass? are distinct from the common S. hudsonius of the eastern part of the continent. The differences between them are very trivial, and in respect to what these are, authors are by no means unanimous. They are gen- "1869.} 189 [Allen. 33. Pteromys volucella Cuvier. (Flying Squirrel.) Not common. From its peculiar nocturnal habits this species is one easily overlooked. From its known range it must occur in the State. 34. Tamias striatus Baird. (Striped Squirrel.) Abundant in and near the thickets and groves. 35. Spermophilus tridecem-lineatus Aud. and Bach. (Striped Prairie Squirrel. Striped Gopher.) Abundant, and to the farmers a destructive pest. Seen almost daily, both on the wild prairie and in the cultivated fields. They are active throughout the summer, and quite destructive to the young corn in the spring, the kernel of which they dig wp, and thus destroy the crop. It is said, however, to be less frequently noticed during the summer, when the grass is high, than earlier» Their burrows run usually but a few inches below the surface, but sometimes ,extend horizontally for the distance of ten feet, though usually much less.* 36. Spermophilus Franklini Richardson. (Gray Prairie Squirrel. Gray Gopher.) Abundant, and, in proportion to its numbers, far more destruetive than the preceding (S. tridecem-lineatus). When very numerous they sometimes destroy acres of newly planted corn by eating the erally slight variations in size, the northern and Rocky Mountain species being generally a little larger than the restricted S. hudsonius, but differing only as the representatives of a single species would be expected to under similar differences of habitat. There are no essential differences in color, the variation in this respect being in no case greater than specimens from different localities in New England present, as I have before pointed out (Bull. Mus. Comp. Zodl., No. vill, p. 223). Specimens from northern Maine have just as good claims for specific distinctness from those of eastern Massachusetts as either of the above-named supposed species have to be regarded as specifically distinct front the S. Audsonius. They differ in color and in the texture of the fur, the Maine specimens im question being grayer, with thicker, heavier pelage, and larger in size. Those from some loeali- ties have also a relatively shorter tail, differences precisely similar to those urged as distinguishing severally these supposed species, and equally great in degree. The habitat of S. hudsonius, then, it seems to: me, really extends throughout the northern part of the continent, from the Atlantic to the Pacific. Intelligent trav- ellers and naturalists perfectly familiar with the S. kuwdsonius at the East, who have visited the region inhabited by the other supposed species, as Alaska and the Rocky Mountains, report that they saw nothing about the red squirrel they met with there, either in habits or otherwise, that led them to suspect it to be at all different from S. hudsonius. 1 For a very complete account of the habits of this species, see the late Robert Kennicott’s excellent papers on the Mammals of Illinois, in the Patent Office Re- ports (Agriculture) for 1856 and 1857 (1856, p. 74). Allen.} 190 [December 15, seed. During the spring months it is generally numerous, but after about the first of June is rarely observed, and all my efforts to obtain specimens, both in this State and in Illinois, where it is equally com- mon, were ineffectual. The burrows of this species run to the depth of three or four feet, and extend to a considerable distance. The Prairie Dog (Cynomys ludovicianus), so characteristic of the more western prairies, is not met with to the eastward of the Mis- souri river. Dr. Hayden says the first village he met with in as- cending the Missouri was about ten miles below the mouth of the Niobrara.!. Mr. Cyrus Thomas erroneously includes this animal in his catalogue of the * Mammals of Illinois,” published in Vol. 1v of the Transactions of tlie Illinois State Agricultural Society. 37. Arctomys monax Gmelin. (Woodchuck. Marmot.) This animal appears also to be absent from western Iowa. I met with but a single individual who had seen it in the State. He had formerly lived in Davis county, in the southeastern part, where he informs me it occurs, as also in the adjoining counties of Missouri. On this authority it is included in the present list. 38. Castor fiber Linn. (Beaver.) Reported to still exist on the South Raccoon river, but nearly or quite exterminated in most of the eastern and southern portions of the State. A gentleman residing in the southern part of Dallas county informed me that when he settled there, eighteen years be- fore, he being one of the first settlers of the county, the beaver was then common there. He said it was now quite exterminated in that vicinity, none having been seen for a considerable period. From the frequent occurrence of creeks in Iowa called by the name of this animal, it seems probable that it was once numerous here. 59. Geomys bursarius Richardson. (Pouched or Pocket Go- pher.) Exceedingly numerous everywhere, and a great pest. The farm- ers regard it as agriculturally the “ great curse of the country.” In some localities it destroys the fruit trees, the groves planted for shade and the osage-orange hedges, by feeding upon their roots in winter. It seems to be nowhere on the decrease, as from its peculiar habits it is difficult to destroy. As the animal seldom appears above the sur- face of the ground, and only at night, one may reside for years where they are numerous without seeing one. The moist and the dry por- tions of the prairie are alike haunted by them; and the farmer too 1 Transact. Amer. Phil. Soc., Vol, x11, 2d series, p. 145. 1869.] 191 [Allen. often sees their unwelcome hillocks thrown up night after night in his garden, or within a few feet of his door. As their burrows are always closed, few persons know how to trap them. A few farmers have been successful in poisoning them with strychnine, and now and then one is shot. To shoot them it is necessary to open their burrows and watch with a gun kept in readiness to fire the instant they appear at the opening to close it, as they show their head only, and for merely an instant. The gopher will allow no light to enter its bur- row, and when it is broken into it hastens to repair the breach. In trapping them an opening is made into their galleries, through which a small steel trap is inserted as far as it conveniently can be with the hand, and the opening then partially closed. The animal hastening to close the opening must generally pass over the trap. Occasionally, however, the trap is found pushed up into the opening and firmly wedged there with the impacted earth, in which case it is usually un- sprung. The gopher is hence often credited with a degree of cun- ning far beyond what it possesses, the safe removal of the trap being purely accidental on the part of the animal. As the burrows are extensive, with many branches, it is impossible to tell on which side of the opening the occupant may be, and hence coming from the side opposite to that where the trap is placed, it often succeeds in closing the hole without being captured.’ This animal is said to be unable to swim, and that it is often drowned in its burrows, when they are inundated by the sudden rise of the prairie streams.?_ Whether or not large rivers form impassable barriers to it, it seems to be well substantiated that while this animal occurs on the Iowa side of the Mississippi and in central Illinois, or throughout that part of the latter State south and east of the Illinois river, it does not exist in that portion situated between the Illinois and the Mississippi. Mr. Kennicott refers to his having heard this reported, but he was unable to vouch for the truthfulness of the ac- count. When in this section of Illinois, however, I was repeatedly informed by competent and trustworthy observers who had resided in this part of the State since its first settlement, and who had traversed it extensively, that the pocket gopher did not exist in that portion of illinois between these rivers. This fact seems the more strange when 1 For a detailed account of the habits of this interesting species, see Kennicott’s papers on the Mammals of Illinois, in the Patent Office Report on Agriculture for 1857, p. 72. ' 2R. Kennicott. Patent Office Rep., Agriculture, 1857, p. 75. Allen.] 192 [December 15, we remember that the gopher is common in portions of Wisconsin, be- ing in fact very numerous in Winnebago and Fond du Lac counties, as I have myself ascertained. The Perognathus fasciatus may well be expected to occur in south- western Jowa, since it is well known to exist in northeastern Kansas, not many miles from the Iowa border. MURIDZ. 40. Jaculus hudsonius Baird. (Jumping Mouse.) Doubtless not uncommon, since it is numerous in neighboring por- tions of Wisconsin and Illinois. 41. Hesperomys leucopus Wagner. (White-footed Mouse.) A species I take to be this was not uncommon. From the locality it may be what has been recognized by Professor Baird as the H. sonoriensis of Le Conte,’ described by the latter gentleman from a specimen from Sonora. Specimens are referred to it by Professor Baird from Fort Union and other localities in northwestern Dacotah, and from various intermediate points southward to Texas and New Mexico ; the H. leucopus of Richardson from the Saskatchawan being also referred to it, it is thus recognized as having a considerable range in latitude. The western limit of H. leucopus is given by Pro- fessor Baird as the Mississippi. As my specimens are not appreciably different from H. leucopus from Massachusetts, one is left to two alternatives ; either that of regarding the H. leucopus as ranging westward across the State of Iowa to the Missouri, or of considering H. sonoriensis as indistinguishable as a species from H. leucopus. I am the more inclined to the latter opinion from the almost exact resem- blance which authentic specimens of the former that I have examined bear to others unquestionably of H. leucopus. Its recognized wide dis- tribution in Jatitude does not at all accord with its supposed limited range eastward, in a region of so uniform a character as the one now in question. In regard to H. sonoriensis, Professor Baird observes : “This species has the general characters of the white-footed mouse of the eastern States; and it is only after the comparison of extensive series that I have been able to detect differences which, though slight, are so constant and of such a character as to appear something more than a mere local variation. I shall, however, be obliged to indicate the differences rather by comparison than as absolute characters.” 1 Mam. N. Amcer., p. 474. 1869.] 193 [Allen. As I have previously observed,' I believe that a considerable number of merely nominal species of Hesperomys have been recognized as valid, and in a group presenting such a wide range of variation in color and in the proportions of the different parts of the body as different representatives of even the restricted. H. leucopus do, I fail to see the propriety of basing species on such intangible differences as distinguish H. sonoriensis. 42. Hesperomys michiganensis Wagner. (Prairie White- footed Mouse.) Apparently common; several specimens taken. I made my first acquaintance with this species in life, in Ogle county, Illinois, where I found a pair in June in their nest under a flat stone at the edge of a cornfield. A newly born litter of young were attached to the teats of the female. The contrast of color between the dorsal and ventral areas of the body was well marked, and the line of separation along the sides clearly defined.” The Wood Rat (Veotoma floridana) has been found in northwest- ern Kansas, about a hundred miles from the southwestern corner of Towa, and judging from what is known of its distribution, it may be expected to occur in portions of the latter State. 43. Arvicola riparius Ord. (Meadow Mouse.) Apparently common. I obtained several specimens, some of which are scarcely appreciably different from Massachusetts ones; others more resemble some obtained by me in Northern Illinois. In the latter locality I obtained young specimens in the fall that in general char- acters are referable to A. riparius, but which in the character of the fur are quite different from the ordinary type of this species at the same age at the East, the coat being longer and heavier; the longer hairs presented a more bristly appearance, many of which were hoary, thus giving a well-marked grizzly aspect to the pelage. Inthe long heavy coat it seems to correspond with the prairie variety mentioned by Prof. Baird, and to which he applied the name longipils, in reference to this peculiarity; but they differ from it in color, which may, how- ever, and most probably does, result from a difference in age. The longer and coarser pelage noticeable in- the Arvicola of the prairie is similar to that previously referred to in this paper as characterizing _ the prairie minks. i 1 Bull. Mus. Comp. Zo6l., No. vin, p. 227. 2 Compare with this the remarks of Mr. Kennicott and Prof. Baird in reference to ‘‘ Mus Bairdii.”’ Pat. Office Rep., Agr., 1856, p. 92; Mam. N. Amer., p. 477. PROCEEDINGS B. 8. N. H.—VOL. NIII. 13 ’ FEBRUARY, 1870. Allen.] 194 [January 5, The two following species of Arvicola also doubtless exist, at least in portions of the State, as they are not uncommon in the adjoining State of Illinois. 44. Arvicola austera LeConte, (Prairie Meadow Mouse.) 45. Arvicola pinetorum LeConte. (Pine Mouse.) 46. Fiber zibethicus Cuvier. (Muskrat.) Common along the streams. ‘LEPORIDZ. 47. Lepus sylvaticus Bachman. (Gray Rabbit.) Common about the groves and thickets. In respect to the distribu- tion of this species in Iowa, Dr. White has written me as follows: “ It occurs all over the State, but is not common in the northwestern part. Indeed it is most common in the most cultivated districts, especially in southern and southeastern Iowa.” He adds that this is the only species of rabbit occurring in the State, to his knowledge. It is probable that the Prairie Hare (L. campestris Bach.), the western representative of the Z. americanus of the northern tier of States east of the Mississippi (if there is, in fact, any reason to con- sider them distinct), may occur in the northern part of the State. DIDELPHIDZ. 48. Didelphys virginiana Shaw. (Opossum.) From its general known distribution, this species might well be expected to be more or less frequent in the southern part of the State. Dr. White, however, informs me that it is very rare there, but that he saw two specimens some years since in the southeastern part. January 5, 1870. Mr. R. C. Greenleaf in the chair. Twenty one members present. Drs. G. A. Maack and Francis R. Staehli and Messrs. James H.. Blake, Richard Bliss, Jr., and A. R. Crandall of the Mu-— seum of Comparative Zoology at Cambridge, Mr. Frederic W. Wheildon of Concord, Mr. Frederic A. Clapp of Dor- chester, Mr. Timothy O. Fuller of Newton, Mr. Charles J. 1870.] 195 [Stodder. Maynard of Newtonville, Mr. Frank H. Nutter of W. Rox- bury, and Messrs. George F. Child, A. A. Childs, D. M. Fisk, Emile Fontarive, Robert A. Shailer, Hollis Thayer, John H. Thorndike and William F. Whitney of Boston, were elected Resident Members. Section of Microscopy. January 12, 1870. Mr. R. C. Greenleaf in the chair. Eight members present. Mr. Stodder referred to a communication of Mr. R. C. Greenleaf! on a specimen of Aulacodiscus oreganus Bail., prepared by Mr. Samuels, which im the process of mounting separated into two plates; one being the outer, and the other the inner plate of one valve. A few days since a similar thing happened to Mr. Samuels when mounting another specimen of the same species. The Diatom sepa- rated into two pieces, the inner and outer plates of one valve, as Mr. Samuels supposed. Buta careful inspection of the specimen, which was exhibited to the Section, indicated an entirely different origin. One disc was a perfect A. oreganus, with all the characters of that species, having ten rays, and “feet.” The other was more hyaline, the umbilicus less distinct, the granules and “feet ” impertectly devel- oped, and had eleven rays and “feet.” Mr. Stodder’s explanation of the appearances—if Mr. Samuels was not mistaken as to the facts —jis that one disc is the parent, and the other a valve of a new frustule, which was forming in the process of self-division, the growth of which was stopped before it had come to maturity. Ehrenberg and some other naturalists have made the number of rays in such forms a specific character; Bailey and others have rejected this prin- ciple of classification, but here for the first time we have positive evidence that a form with eleven rays has been derived directly from one of ten rays. Such a change of characters in one order of plants _ being authentically established, it is a reasonable inference that all other orders may be liable to similar changes, and therefore great caution should be used in allowing specific value to unimportant characters. 1 These Proceedings, Vol. x11, p. 361. Shaler.] 196 [January 19, January 19, 1870. Vice President Dr. C. T. Jackson in the chair. Forty three persons present. The following paper was read: — ON THE PARALLEL Ripces or GiaciALt Drirr In EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS, WITH SOME REMARKS ON THE GLACIAL PE- riop. By N.S. SHALER, Proressor OF PALZONTOLOGY, H. U. In the immediate neighborhood of Boston the unstratified drift does not lie in anything like a continuous sheet, but is distributed in long and. rather narrow ridges, which, with varying height, on ac- count of long continued denudation, may be traced for miles across the country. These ridges are particularly conspicuous in the islands of the harbor of Boston, where, although much worn by the action of the tidal currents, the parallelism is quite apparent. The fact of the existence of this symmetry in the arrangement of these islands was first remarked by Count Pourtales, assistant in the Coast Survey corps. He perceived, what may be readily observed in the accurate map of that survey, that there are two sets of trends exhibited in the arrangement of these islands, the principal being from northwest to southeast, and the other and somewhat subordinate set of ranges run- ning from northeast to southwest, or directly at right angles to the other set. Although the intersecting water level makes these ridges somewhat more conspicuous in the harbor than upon the land, they are, in fact, better marked upon the main land than among the islands. All the high land of Chelsea and Winthrop is composed, of half a dozen or more tolerably lofty drift ridges, which retain a remarka- — ble parallelism though varying a good deal in altitude, and somewhat in transverse extent. The spaces between these ridges are not quite cut down to the sea level at all points, though at no point much elevated above it. The effect of marine denudation at a time when this shore region was more depressed than it is now, is evident throughout this group of drift hills. The greater part of East Boston seems to be a ridge corresponding in course with those in Chelsea. The general trend of these ridges is northwest and southeast, with few degrees of variation in some cases, but on the whole with as much recularity as is ordinarily observable in any such geographical features. Passing to the westward we find in Charlestown, Somerville, Cam- 1870.] 197 {Shaler, bridge and part of Medford, the same sort of ridges with a similar trend. One of these ridges beginning in Charlestown, and continued through Somerville and Medford to the borders of West Cambridge, has a length of five miles. At certain points in this group of drift hills we perceive indications of the northeast and southwest ridges, but on the whole the ridges conform in course with those in Chelsea. On the south side of Charles River, some of the loftiest ridges, such as Corey’s Hill, are composed for the upper hundred feet, at least, of this drift material, and the direction of their axes is approximately the same as those in Cambridge. In Boston and South Boston the drift hills, though not so clearly defined as those just mentioned, seem to belong to the same class of northwest and southeast ridges. A more extended comparison of the courses of the drift hills of the coast would not be desirable here; enough has been given to make it clear to those who are conversant with the facts that there exists the same system of trends in the ridges on the main land that Count Pourtales has pointed out in the harbor. It is an interesting question to determine whether these ridges have been formed as such, or are the remnants of more extensive masses; upon the determination of this question must rest many important conclusions concerning the nature of the operations which took place during the glacial period. A comparison of the sections given at various points in the islands of the harbor, at Chelsea, Somerville, Cambridge, Brighton, South Boston and elsewhere, has shown that through this region the drift is remarkably similar at the same height above the sea. The mass of this drift has a structure which is of a very inexplicable character; it cannot be called stratified in any ordinary sense of the word; the pebbles are of various sizes, from five foot boulders down to coarse sand, but the whole packed in a fine mud, which so binds the materials together that in the lower parts of the mass, where it has been subjected to consid- erable pressure, it is almost as hard as parts of the Roxbury conglom- erate, and resembles it in a most surprising and suggestive manner. This peculiar feature of a mud cement binding the mass together has been long ago remarked by Professor Agassiz as unquestionable evi- dence of the fact that this mass could not have been deposited under the ordinary conditions of stratified materials. In sections such as are exhibited on Somerville hill, or at several points in Chelsea, this mass is seen to have a thickness of at least one hundred feet. Throughout this extensive section there is nothing which can be recognized as Shaler.] 198 (January 19, stratification. There are, however, certain features which distinguish this mass from the ordinary moraines, such as may be found in con- tact with existing glaciers in Switzerland, or in lower positions in the valleys of the same region, where similar accumulations mark the successive stages of retreat.of the ancient ice streams. ‘There is a much greater uniformity in the condition of the materials; a far larger part of the boulders, amounting to about two or three per cent., are distinctly scored or scratched. At certain points, though the paste still envelops the pebbles, there is a certain bedding to the mass, produced by pebbles of a similar size being more abundant on particular levels. On the very summits of these drift ridges, we gen- erally find the large boulders very abundant; indeed it seems at first as if there had been some peculiar change in the conditions of de- position at the time when these boulders were accumulated. A care- ful examination has convinced me that in most cases these abundant erratics on the summits of the hills are the remains of that part of the section which has disappeared since the formation of these ridges. A comparison of the frequency of occurrence of these boulders in the remaining parts of the hills and on the surface, will satisfy any one that there must have been a very large amount of denudation since their formation. With this sort of a measure we cannot suppose that the amount of height lost by these hills has been much less than one hundred feet. Should the student feel any doubt concerning the essentially un- stratified character of these drift beds, he has only to compare the sections exposed around the base of many of these ridges where the same materials which once formed a part of the mass of the hills have been worn away and stratified by the action of the sea at a time when the emergence of the land at the close of the glacial period had not been completed. He will there see that the pebbles are all deposited separately from the sand, and this in turn apart from the mud, the order of the deposits being precisely that which is always found where such varied materials are acted upon in the tidal cur- rents which sweep every sea shore. Although at first disposed not to accept that view, I have been compelled by an extensive study of these drifts to adopt the theory advanced by Agassiz, that these drift deposits are essentially the work of some other agent of deposi- tion than water. I see no other view likely to meet these facts than that offered by Professor Agassiz, i. e., that this mass is the material which rested in and upon the glacial sheet at the close of its history 1870.) 199 [Shaler. and was dropped in the place where it lies by the melting of the ice which held it.' The only difficulty in this view is to conceive that such a mass of detritus as that in question could have ever been contained in a glacial stream. There can be little doubt that this drift must have been, when originally deposited, at least one hundred and fifty feet thick. It is very doubtful whether the thickest of the Swiss glaciers, the Aletsch or the Mer de Glace would, it melted down, de- posit a coating of more than twenty feet in average thickness upon their floors, and yet these have immense feeding grounds, enormous tracts of mountain side which are constantly throwing masses of de- tritus into the glacial streams. Although the evidence entitles us to suppose that the continental glacier, to whose action we would attrib- ute these detrital hills, was immensely thicker than the valley claciers of Switzerland, yet the region projecting above the level of the ice must have been small,—too insignificant indeed to have furnished any considerable part of the drift materials. We are thus driven to suppose that the mass of this sheet of drift, the relics of which alone we see in the hills we are studying, must have been rent from the floor of the glacier as it moved along. The riving power of the movement which scored our hills with the deep grooves must have been sufficient to have torn up large amounts of fragments from its bed. As we have evidence that the glacial sheet was at many points over half a mile in depth, we may without diffi- culty allow it the power of riving this supply of detritus from the rock floors over which it moved; it is difficult, however, to perceive how the supply of fragments could have been lifted into the body of the ice sheet in order to have been carried along with it. We are not prepared to see how it would be possible for a glacier to push along with its advance a stratum of one hundred feet or more of pebbles, mud and sand. We must believe that there was an admix- ture of ice with the drift, so that it could move as ice. It is not easy to see how a pebble could be lifted to a position in the glacier above the point where it was torn from the bed rock. Yet that there was some such lifting action, there is abundant evidence. Nothing is more common than to find fragments of a peculiar bed rock many feet above the base of the drift section. The admirable exposure in the eutting made for a sewer in the College yard in Cambridge, shows this feature very clearly; large masses of the clay slate grooved and seratched by long working on the solid rock, were found at a height of several feet above the bed from which they had been torn. Shaler.) 20 0 [January 19, If we accept the general conclusion, which it does not seem possible to escape, that these drift hills are the remnants of the deposit made at the melting of the great glacier, then we must believe that this coating of detrital matter covered with something like uniformity the whole of this part of the coast. It would necessarily vary a great deal in thickness at particular points, but it should have existed everywhere. If with this view we compare the structure of these _ hills at points some miles apart, we find at once abundant evidence in its support. ‘The actual height of the summits of these drift hills corresponds pretty closely. The character of the deposit is also very similar indeed. ‘The mineralogical nature of the fragments of the mass may differ greatly, for in all cases a large part of the mass is made up of materials which can be referred to neighboring rocks; that is to rocks situated within a range of fifty miles or so; but the nature of the deposit remains unchanged. Such a comparison will soon exclude the possibility of these ridges being the terminal or lateral moraines of a glacier, which supposition, moreover, is suffi- ciently met by a mere reference to their geographical position. The relation of the separate masses of drift is irreconcilable with any other hypothesis than that they are the remains of what was once a continuous sheet. The only difficulty of a serious character is to answer the question which at once arises as to the cause of the peculiar parallelism of the two series of ridges which are discernible in this region. The few who are familiar with the geology of the environs of Boston may have noticed that there are two lines of upheaval in this part of Massachusetts, each marked by dykes and more or less considerable dislocations of strata. One of these, and by far the most considera- ble, whether measured by the frequency of the ridges or by the height of the dislocations which it produces, has a course of about northwest and southeast; the other less important, but clearly marked trend, is from the northeast to southwest. It will be at once observed that these two systems of directions, those of the drift hills and those ob- served in the series of dislocations in this district, correspond exactly. With this amount of information it is by no means difficult for the observer to perceive that it becomes at once probable that these drift hills are only cappings of glacial detritus lying upon ridges of the more solid bed rock of the country, the solid pedestal having pre- vented the wearing action of the streams from affecting the detrital matter which rested upon them. Wherever it is possible to get 1870.] 201 [Shaler. access to the base of these hills, it is readily seen that such js in fact the case, the ridges of rock are distinctly traceable on the flanks of the drift hills of Somerville, Brookline and Brighton. Even where, as is often the case, the wash from the upper part of the hills has covered their flanks so that it is not possible to get access to the pro- tecting buttresses of rock, there is generally other evidence to show that the drift ridge has a rock ridge beneath it. Allusion has already been made to the fact that while the drift material does not indicate anything which can be properly called stratification, there is nevertheless a certain obscure bedding near the top of the mass. Now it is easily seen, as, for example, at the easternmost point of Prospect Hill in Somerville, that this bed is not horizontal, as it would naturally have been had the mass been laid down on a plain, but curves over the hill in a gradual arch, precisely as it should if the supposition of an internal ridge of rock be correct. The interpretation of the record of the events of the glacial and post-glacial parts of the history of this region is difficult, and much doubt must necessarily exist for a long time as to what is the true reading. I cannot doubt, however, that we must acknowledge that very great changes in the face of the surface as it was left by the glacial sheet, have taken place. If the foregoing reasoning is correct, and there originally lay all along our shore a sheet of glacial detritus of which the ridges which we have been studying are only the wrecks, then we must be prepared to admit long continued erosion to produce such changes as have taken place. Nor will erosion, unattended by other agents of change, have produced the result; we must suppose that the present shore was at one time higher above the sea in this neighborhood than it is now. When the ridges which remain in the harbor were protected by their rock bases from erosion, they must have stood at a higher level above the sea than at present, for they are now without this protection at ordinary tide mark, and are all, except when artificially guarded, giving way before the action of the sea. The glacial period was evidently a time of great oscillations of level, and not the least of the difficulties which the geologist finds in study- ing its phenomena, is to determine the character of the changes in the level of the land. The formation of the more conspicuous features in the topography of the drift formations of eastern Massachusetts, would require something like the following succession of events. 1. The covering of the whole country with a glacial sheet, the ice having a slow movement towards the shore, the direction of move- Shaler.] 902 [January 19, ment of the bottom, at least, varying a good deal with the surface of the country traversed. It is not necessary to assume that this move- ment extended to any very great distance inland,.as it has not been proved that any boulders have been transported more than thirty or forty miles along the direction of the striz. It is not possible to deny that detrital matter may have been brought from greater distances inland along this path, for the facts have not yet been care- fully analyzed; but as yet I have been unable to find any masses bedded in the drift which could be referred to more remote points, while by far the greatest number are clearly traceable to rocks which are found in the immediate vicinity of the point of deposit. 2. The rending from the floor of the ice stream of large quantities of fragments which were ground to mud in the jam of materials at the base of the ice sheet, or lifted into the body of the mass by the irregular tumbling movements which must have occurred in the pas- sage of the stream over the broken surface it traversed, followed by the melting of the glacial accumulation and the deposition of the mass of detritus it contained in the unstratified shape in which we now find its remains. 3. The action of the drainage streams and tidal currents on this incoherent mass, the former probably swollen for a time by the waters of the melting ice, cutting away the incoherent mass of drift, and clearing out the old channels in which they ran before the glacial period, leaving drift ridges capping the sammits of the original, low, rock hills of the country. 4. During these actions, but at times which remain to be deter- mined with exactness, certainly one, probably two movements of the surface took place, which have left only an imperfect record; the first and well proven, being a submergence of at least one hundred feet; for to that height on our hills of drift are superficial patches of stratified materials found. This movement probably oceurred at the end of the ice time, and the change of shore did not last very long. The other movement was a depression also; if it really occurred, it happened at the close of the elevation which followed this first de- pression, in which the land seems to have risen a little higher than it is at present, the difference being probably not over twenty to forty feet. I regard this second depression as probable, but not proven. The reader who is familiar with the disposition of the unstratified drift on our shores, will recognize the fact that the mass is much greater at some points than others. This is to be expected. If we examine 1870.] 203 [Shaler. those regions which most closely resemble in their present condition the state in which this country was placed during the glacial period, we may find a ready explanation of this fact. In Greenland, for instance, although the glacial sheet covers the whole of the country at a few miles back from the shore, it only comes down to the coast in the valleys or fiords. It will be at once seen, as soon as the dis- tribution of our drift is indicated on a good geological map, that the greatest accumulation of it is about the mouths of our larger river valleys. ‘The accumulation, of which we find the remains in the drift hills of this neighborhood and the islands of the harbor, is the prod- uct of the stream which descended the Charles River valley. The immense drift deposits of Long Island, New York, are the product of the Housatonic, the Connecticut and the Thames glacial streams, possibly also of that more gigantic glacier which swept down the Hudson. It is evident that these local glaciers could have been in ex- istence only- during the later part of the drift period. There was an earlier time when the moving sheet swept over the whole shore line, as is proven by the fact that every exposed ledge on the shore or on the islands beyond it, is scored by the glacial movement. The termi- nal moraine during this time must have been far out to sea, and it is probably to this first stage of the glaciation of this country that we owe the formation of the broad submerged table land which borders the whole northern coast of the United States for a width of over one hundred miles. We owe to Professor Agassiz the recognition of the probable glacial origin of this set of banks and shoals. If we extend our hasty survey beyond the New England shore to the northward, we find many facts which are reconcilable with the views here presented. The banks of Newfoundland are most likely the great terminal moraines of the vast glacier which discharged the snows of the greater part of the region drained by the St. Lawrence. They bear much the same relation to that valley which the eastern part of Long Island bears to the basins’ of the Connecticut and of the rivers to the eastward. The most difficult question which the geologist has to deal with in connection with the drift beds, is that of the origin of Cape Cod. I do not propose to undertake at present the discussion of the history of this singular promontory. [ will only venture the suggestion that the main body of the cape has very likely a low axis of elevation beneath it, connected in some way with those lines of disturbance By-Laws.) 204 {January 19, which are to be traced in the islands immediately to the southward, especially in Martha’s Vineyard and Nantucket. Dr. Thomas Waterman was chosen Curator of Mammals and Comparative Anatomy. On motion of Dr. B. Joy Jeffries, the following amend- ments to the By-Laws of the Society were passed. Section LX was altered so as to read Section X. A new section was added, as follows :— SECTION 1X. OF SECTIONS Article 1. Sections of the Society, holding separate meetings of their own, may be formed on the written application of ten members, by the consent of the members present at two consecutive ie age of the general Society. Art. 2. The requirements of membership shall be: 1st. Membership in the general Society. 2d. Written nomination by two members at a regular meeting of the Section. 3d. Election by a three fourths vote of the members present at the subsequent meeting. Ath. Signature to cies standing rules within six months a the date ne election. Art. 3. The records shall be entered in chronological order upon the book containing the records of the ordinary meetings of the Society. Art.4. Such notices of each meeting as shall be judged by the Publishing Committee suitable for publication in the Proceedings or Memoirs of the Society, shall be announced by the Secretary at the next regular meeting of the Society. Art. 5. Sections shall have the exclusive right to make additional regulations for the perfecting of their organization, subject to the approval of the Council. Messrs. C. J. Sprague and R. C. Greenleaf and Drs. Charles Ware, J. B. 8. Jackson and James C. White were appointed a committee to nominate officers for the ensuing year. 1870.] 205 [Hagen. Section of Entomology. January 26, 1870. Mr. E. Burgess in the chair. Twelve persons present. Mr. F. G. Sanborn exhibited a drawing of the larva of Callosamia Promethea, made by the late Mr. C. A. Shurtleff, together with the specimen after it had spun its cocoon; a memorandum written by Mr. Shurtleff on Sept. 17, 1860, read as follows: A full grown larva was just beginning to spin its cocoon; on the eleventh segment there was a portion of the old skin which it had previous to the last moulting; the skin formed a perfect ring, and of course was very small for the full grown larva, the diameter of the ring on the eleventh being .25 in., while the tenth segment measured .37 in. in diameter. There was a little piece of the old skin on the wart on the tail. The caterpillar appeared to be perfectly healthy and well formed, excepting that it could not use the last pair of prolegs very well in walking; it could, however, take hold with them to a certain extent. It spun a perfect cocoon, and tried to cast its skin, but after bursting the skin on the back, died before it could shed it. Dr. H. Hagen read a criticism of the views of Dr. Packard concerning the Neuroptera, as given in his recently com- pleted “Guide,” and explained that, in the manuscript of his own “Synopsis of North American Neuroptera,” he had, in accordance with the views of the most prominent Entomolo- gists for twenty eight years, distinctly separated the Pseudo- neuroptera and Neuroptera as two different parts of the work. Dr. Hagen also remarked that Mr. Fritz Miiller had sent to him some white ants from Itahahy, St. Catharina, Brazil, with the following remarks :— These nests of white ants are more or less regular cylinders, one span high and two or three inches thick. By horizontal floors they are divided into twelve or fifteen compartments or chambers. The outer surface bulges out so that one can make out the number of Scudder. ] 206 (January 26, chambers by the enlargements of the cylinder. A pillar goes through all the compartments; close to this, or in it, runs an oblique passage from each chamber to the next. Sometimes all these passages together form a somewhat regular winding stair through all the com- partments. For the impregnated female these passages are too narrow, and she can therefore not leave her chamber. There are, both in the outer wall and in the horizontal divisions, passages too small to admit the passing of the winged ants; but neither in the outside wall nor in the chambers is there any opening to the outside in nests which have not been injured. . In the outside wall the passages run from top to bottom. In the divisions, from circumference to centre without reaching this latter. In the flat compartments they are not to be detected from the outside; in the circumference they appear as flattened ridges. In drying, the outer side of the passages falls off, and then they are to be seen as deep hollows with inflated borders. In undisturbed nests the only entrance seems to be on the upper surface some inches under ground. The nest is not directly connected with the earth, but is sur- rounded by about a finger’s breadth of free space. The nest can, therefore, as soon as the upper end is freed from earth, be easily taken out of the ground. I have never found in one of these nests more than one impreg- nated female. Besides the winged ants, the eggs and the larve, there are found two kinds of laborers; of these one kind is distin- guished by a truncated nose. Not in the nest but in the same piece of land, are found, in planting corn, single white ants with disproportionately large heads and long mandibles. The winged ants were stated by Dr. Hagen to belong to— Termes striatus, or perhaps to 7. similis; the imago is in too bad a condition for accurate determination. The soldier with truncated nose was figured by him as 7. similis; the soldier with long mandibles, as 7. cingulatus. No description of white ants’ nests like this has ever been given before. Mr. 8. H. Scudder remarked that in a recent examination of the external genital armature of our diurnal Lepidoptera, he had noticed the extraordinary fact that in the males of 1870.] 907 (Sanborn. the North American species of the genus Misoniades. these organs were asymmetrical. The asymmetry is confined to the lower lateral plates, which are unusually developed in this genus, and shows itself in the diverse length of the lower process and in the size, and the entireness or the ex- cision of the lateral flap.. The only species in the genus, as generally accepted, which does not come under this rule, is V. Catullus; but the structural features of all the appen- dages of the body of this species show that it is wrongly placed in this relation. Mr. Scudder also stated that the butterfly described by Dr. Harris in his State Report as Hudamus Bathyllus,—a name invariably accepted by subsequent writers—was not the spe- cies originally described and figured by Abbot and Smith under the same specific name; he therefore proposed to call Harris’s species Hudamus Pylades. Mr. P. S.Sprague referred to an instance related by a friend not versed in entomology, where “ flies” were seen, through a hole in the ice in midwinter, to ascend in large numbers from the bottom of a stream to the surface and take flight. Mr. B. P. Mann stated that he had taken a specimen of Carabus Chamissonis Fisch., in Labrador. Mr. F. G. Sanborn remarked that he had taken ten or twelve specimens of the same species in August, on the sides of Mt. Washington, N. H., at a height of from four to five thousand feet above the sea. | He also reported the capture in Andover, Mass., on Christmas day, 1869, of Capnia and Teeniopteryx, moving actively upon the ice; of several Staphylinide of the genera Lathrobium, Stenus, Philonthus and _ Lithocharis, together with Photinus corruscus and larvee of Telephorus, and some undetermined Coleopterous and Geometrideous larve, alsoa species of Salda (Hemipterous), and of Diptera, Hydrophorus pirata Loew, and Sepsis sp., which were struggling in water of about one eighth inch in depth, covering the surface of thei ice in meadows. Jeffries. ] 208 [February 2, A great number of Arachnid, mostly of small size, were noticed under the same circumstances, and appeared to represent many species. He was in pursuit of the aberrant forms, Boreus and Chionea, but several hours of careful search failed to reveal any specimens of either. February 2, 1870. Vice President Dr. C. T. Jackson in the chair. Thirty three persons present. Dr. B. Joy Jeffries stated that, as at different times during the past three years he had had occasion to call the attention of the Society to the physiology of accommodation in man and other animals, including birds, he would ask to be allowed to make a few remarks on a special part of the eye which is interested in, and may be employed in, accommoda- tion. He illustrated his remarks by a series of pictures and diagrams representing sections of the human eye and of a number of different animals, made through the ciliary muscle and the adjacent parts of the sclerotic, cornea and iris. From dissections made by many ana- tomists, and the special studies of several physiologists, it resulted that the space in the eye hitherto known as the canal of Fontana, who first described it in 1778, is now proved not to be 2 canal with walls, but rather a triangular space between the ciliary muscle, iris, and sclerotic or cornea, filled by a sort of mesh work attaching the iris to the last named membrane. This mesh work is cut off from the aque- ous humor. It constitutes the ligamentum pectinatum iridis, and is quite distinct from the circular venous sinus in the sclerotic just outside of it, which has apparently sometimes been mistaken for it. Dr. Jeffries discussed the question as to whether it took part in the accommodation of the eye, if not in man where it seemingly could not, in the lower animals where its size increases with the decrease of the ciliary muscle. He remarked that our present knowledge of it is due to the recent researches of Drs. Iwanoif and Rollett. 1870.] 209 (Edwards. Mr. C. J. Sprague declined membership in the Nominating Committee, to which he was recently elected, and Mr. James" M. Barnard was chosen in his place. Section of Microscopy. February 9, 1870. Dr. B. Joy Jeffries in the chair. Nine persons present. The following paper was read :— Notes ON DIATOMACE2. By Pror. ArtrHur MrEAp EpWARDs. I am one of those who have always strongly advocated the keeping of written and drawn notes by observers of nature. However crude ‘and imperfect the drawings may be, however incomplete the written descriptions, yet, if made conscientiously and with due regard to facts, stating what the observer thinks he sees, they always possess the value of truth, and at the same time serve to place upon record and impress upon the mind many things that would otherwise pass un- heeded, and those often of great value. So by following out such a plan, the mind of the student is drilled in system, the great secret of success in all scientific observations, as well as in other matters. For a long time I have kept a book in which, from day to day, and im- mediately as observations are made, memoranda are jotted down, often accompanied by sketches, colored or not, as the subject requires. And on looking back, I frequently find in my older notes the key to some puzzling phenomenon undergoing investigation at a later time. Let not the observer plead the excuse that he cannot draw; I believe that everybody can learn to draw sufficiently well to give a truthful, if not artistic representation of what appears before his eyes. Every one can write well enough to say what he sees when required, and ‘drawing is but a short-hand system of writing. J believe, also, that when a student of nature has recorded any- thing that he thinks will be of value or interest to others, he is in duty bound to make such observations public. To illustrate my belief thus expressed, I thus communicate some brief abstracts from my note book, and if they prove acceptable, will from time to time do the same again. PROCEEDINGS B. 8. X. H.—VOL, XIII. 14 MAROH, 1870. Edwards.] 210 [February 9, My notes are of observations made by means of the microscope, and the first is relative to one of those curious atomies of the vegeta- ble kingdom, the Diatomacee. A few days since (Sept., 1869) I made a gathering in a ditch communicating with the salt water of the Hudson River, opposite the city of New York, at Weehawken, N. J. Of course the water in the ditch was salt; and, in fact, in it last spring I had caught specimens of Stickleback (Gasterosieus) which had come up there from the river to spawn, as is their wont to do. The Ten-spined Stickleback (G. pungitius) I had found very plentiful, and mixed with it a few individuals of the Three-spined (G. aculeatus) ; in fact these fish occurred,in such numbers that when the water be- came foul, as it did by evaporation, the bottom of the ditch was lit- erally covered with their dead bodies. The gathering, however, I have to speak of at the present time was made for the purpose of procuring Diatomacee, and consisted of specimens of an alga be- longing to the genus Enteromorpha, having attached to it more or less firmly numerous Diatomacee and animals. The commonest form of ° Diatom was a Cycloiella, and seemingly fixed in some manner to the Enteromorpha, for it was not shaken off by pretty rough usage. How it was fixed I could not detect; most likely by means of a mucous envelope of such tenuity that it is not readily seen. The next most common form is the truly wonderful, inexplicable Bacillaria paradoxa, the paradoxical bundle of sticks. Often and often have I spent hours looking at this marvel of nature; the mo- tion without apparent cause or mode, an invisible joint which, as a friend of mine, an engineer, once remarked, would be a fortune to any one who would discover it, for here we have several sticks forming the bundle, moving over each other without separating, and yet the use of the highest powers of the microscope has failed to detect the means of their union into one mass or composite group of individuals. This grouping of individuals together, which we so commonly find among the, Diatomacee, as in Schizonema, Achnanthes, Melosira, and a host of other gencra, appears to me to have its analogue in the ani- mal kingdom in the Polyzoa; which, although generally fixed, yet at - certain periods throw off motile forms by means of which the species is distributed. Donot the Diatomacee do likewise? I am of opinion that they do, and I shall produce evidence on that point further on. As to the Bacillaria paradoxa, the oftener I watch it the more it puz- zles me. Not long since I saw one specimen (of course I mean one bundle of individuals) slide out to its utmost limit across the field of 1870.] ot1 (Edwards. view, and then, becoming entangled with two others, which likewise were made up of many individuals, some eight or ten of its frustules (as the complete individuals are called) were twisted around almost off from the rest, so as to lie at right angles to them, and when the group containing the largest number of frustules receded to their former position, which they soon did, the eight or ten seeming by the act of twisting to lose their power of motion among themselves for the time being, were dragged along in a helpless condition, and twisted com- pletely around one revolution, so as thereafter to fall back again into their places, when all went on as usual. That is to say, the regular motion of all the frustules over each other succeeded. Now what kind of a joint can it be that permits of such eccentric movement! As I have already said, I am more puzzled than ever. For sometime back a discussion has been taking place in some of the European journals as to whether this plant be an inhabitant of fresh or brackish water. What I have observed points to the fact that it will live in either. I have collected it in brackish water at Hoboken, N. J.; my Weehawken collection was from a ditch con- necting directly with the salt water of the Hudson River at its mouth, and some years since I gathered it in the sweet fresh water of the Fishkill ereek, along with Desmids and other truly fresh water plants which, as far as we know, will not live in water containing any appreciable amount of salt, and then, also, in winter and under the ice, but nevertheless in an active condition. And I have taken my salt water Weehawken gathering and diluted it with several times its volume of fresh water, and yet it seems to flourish after many days, and the Bacillaria is apparently more active than when first pro- cured. So, also, the other Diatoms which are present along with it evidently profit by the change, for they have increased rapidly and are in vigorous motion. Along with the Bacillaria in the brackish water at Hoboken, I found numerous individuals of an Amphora, which I have known in this neighborhood for many years, and which I considered unnamed as yet. Toit I have given the provisional name of A. lanceolata, on account of the form of its outline. This genus has always been con- sidered un epiphytaceous one; that is to say, one which grows attached to other plants or submerged substances, yet this form was free and in active motion. In fact I think it was one of the most lively Diatoms Tever saw. So another smaller speeies of Amphora which is common near here, is always, as far as I have noticed, free. Here we have Edwards.] Pie [February 9, species appearing both in the free and attached conditions, and this is even more strikingly illustrated in Schizonema. Bacillaria paradoza is usually set down as the most rapid in motion of the Diatomacezr, its velocity being recorded by Smith, as he meas- ured it, at over one two hundredth of an mchina second. This is certainly pretty quick when we consider that the length of the frus- tule is only .0025 of an inch. But my experience has been that its velocity varies in every degree from that mentioned to perfect rest; at times some individuals will be in rapid movement, while others are motionless; and also I have remarked that from sunrise to noon seems to be the period during which, under ordinary conditions, the move- ment is most active, while during the afternoon it is very sluggish, and at night almost nil. This Amphora, as I saw it at the time mentioned, was moving even more rapidly than I ever saw a Bacillaria move, and that with a steady onward progression very different from that of most naviculiform diatoms. It appears to me that in Schizonema and similar genera, which consist of siliceous loricated naviculiform frustules enclosed in mem- branous tubes, as soon as a rupture of the investing membrane takes place, by fracture or tearing asunder, almost immediately a knowl- edge of the fact is in some way communicated from the point at which the opening occurs to all other points of the tube, as at once the con- tained frustules which hitherto have been at perfect rest or, at most, only moving to a very slight extent, and even then in an extremely sluggish manner, become animated in their motion, and the most of them move towards, and attempt to escape from, the opening made. And this evidently does not result, as might at first have been sup- posed, from any pressure exerted upon them from the closed end of the tube, and which, therefore, only shows itself when the obstacle in the shape of the investing membrane is suddenly removed. For the motion is the true lively action peculiar to the living individual in the naviculiform Diatomacez, and is not in all cases towards the opening made, but often many, or, as in some cases which have come under my observation, most of the frustules begin to move in an opposite direction at first, while at the same time many escape by the opening in the tube, and thereafter assume vigorous motion in the surrounding liquid. Again, usually some of the frustules being, as at first appears, carried along by the stream constituting the mass of those moving towards the opening, all of a sudden seem to change their minds, or are struck with an idea, if I may so express myself, 1870.) 913 {Edwards. and here and there will be seen individuals which at once alter the direction of their course and move in exactly the opposite direction, or backwards, as we may say. The individual frustules as they es- cape from the ruptured end of the investing tube and enter the sur- rounding water, do so with the peculiar trembling and apparently un- certain movement so characteristic of many of these organisms. It will be well to note that these observations have been mainly made on Schizonema Grevillei, a species occurring very commonly in New York harbor, although I have noticed the same thing to happen with other species of the same genus, and, if Jam not mistaken, in the allied one, Homcocladia. After a time it would seem that the broken end of the tube be- comes closed again; perhaps by the deposition of new matter, or it” may possibly be by the action of the surrounding water upon the fluid within the tube, if it be of a different composition (which would seem to be extremely doubtful, however), as the frustules no longer attempt te escape and resume their quiescent state from which they have been startled by the accident of the rupture, or they move over each other up and down with the same irregularity which is com- monly the habit of these forms. I am strongly of opinion that certainly in some of the cases in which I have seen this escape of frustules take place from the invest- ing tube, it has not resulted from any rupture caused by my manip- ulation, but would seem to be a normal occurrence. In fact, at such times the diatom is taking upon itself the active or free condition by means of which the species is to be distributed. And we must be- lieve that such is the habit of all so-called epiphytaceous forms, other- Wise it is not easy te comprehend how the species become ‘so wide spread as many of them are, for we have not at present any authentic notice of the formation of free swimming spores in this family. It is hard when making such observations as those I have here recorded, to believe that these organisms are not endowed with sentient capacities, especially when one sees, as I have, a free frustule of such a Schizo- nema apparently perseveringly attempt to regain a lodgement within the tube from which it bad some time before escaped, by means of repeated dives towards the hitherto open end, which has since be- come closed. Ihave observed such struggles continue for a minute or more, but never with the success apparently desired. Many months since I mentioned at one of the meetings of the Lyceum of Natural History in New York, that I had seen two ap- Edwards.] 214 [February 9, parently different genera of Diatoms existing within the same invest- ing tube; and now I wish to place that fact upon record, and state one or two more instances of the same mode of growth. During the month of March, 1868, I found in the harbor of New York specimens of Schizonema Greville: in active motion within their investing tubes, but accompanied by a much smalier form possessing a totally different out- line from S. Grevillei, being blunter at the ends, and with parallel sides on 8. V. During the same month, and also in April, I found this mode of occurrence very common, and also Schizonema Grevillei and a Homeocladia in the same tube, and Schizonema cruciger and the small form mentioned above, both in the same tube, and S. cruciger and Greville: in the same tube. In all these cases the frustules were in lively motion, passing over each other from one end to the other of the tube. In May of the present year, 1869, I found growing in the salt water of the “ Mill pond” at Salem, Mass., Schizonema cruciger and WNitzschia closterium, W. S. (Ceratoneis closterium, C. G. E., and Nitzschiella closterium, L. K.), both in the same tube. And here it will be necessary to say something in regard to the form I have called Nitzschia closterium, as I shall thereby, I hope, be enabled to clear away a little for of synonyms. Neither Smith, Kiitzing nor Raben- horst describes or figures any species living within a tube like Schizo- nema, the frustules ef which have an outline and markings similar to Niteschia closterium, so that it is not likely that they ever saw any- thing but the free form or condition of this species. However, Ehrenberg figures and deseribes, under the designation of Schizenema ? Agardhi (Die Infusionsthierchen, 1838, p. 343, T. xx, fig. xvi), a form agreeing with this, but the structure of the frustule is that of Nitzschiella of Rabenhorst, so that the specific name of this species should be Agardhii, whatever its genus be decided to be hereafter. For the present, as it is nearest allied to the forms grouped under Homeocladia, it had better be placed in that genus, so that the syn- onomy would stand thus. Homeocladia Agardhii, C. G. E. (sp.). Abhand. K. Akad. Ber- lin. p. 311. 1833. Ceratoneis closterium, C: G. E. 1840. Nitzschia closterium, W.S. 1853. Nitzschiella closterium, L. R. 1864. What are we to say to such facts as these I record, as well as that of which I sent an account and illustrating specimens to the late Dr Walker-Arnott,—and which has been noticed by Mr. F. Kitton, whe 1870.] 215 (Edwards. examined my specimens, in Hardwicke’s Science Gossip for May, 1869, Vol. v, p. 109,—of the occurrence of what are usually consid- ered two distinct species of Gomphonema, viz., G. capitatum and G. constrictum, both growing upon the same stipes or stalk! But this is not all. Since then I have made gatherings at the same place, and still find the above two forms growing upon the same stalk, and two others of totally different outline which appear also upon the same stipes. So that here we would have four hitherto considered distinct species arising from the same individual. I do not name the two last “mentioned forms, as I am in some doubt with regard to the names that have been applied to them. The question of what is the indi- vidual in the Diatomacee is again raised by the observance of these facts, as well as those I described in my “ Note on a point in the hab- its of the Diatomaceze and Desmidiacee,” read before the Boston Society of Natural History, January 8, 1868, and published in their Proceedings, Vol. x1, p. 361. The specimens illustrating the remark- able mode of occurrence of the two forms of Gomphonema which I sent to Dr. Arnott unfortunately did not arrive until after his death ; but, speaking of my having so found them, he wrote to me in the last letter I received from him as follows. I feel that I am justified in publishing this extract as it is of such importance ; and I also know, from what he wrote to me, that he himself would not object to my doing so were he still living. “Your discovery of G'omphonema constrictum and capitatum grow- ing on the same stalk is interesting, if you are not deceived. When a Gomphonema spore grows on a weed, the stalk (which is merely the external mucus collected at the one end) is formed by the growing frustule. It is not the stalk (or in Schizonema, the tube) which pro- duces the frustule, but the frustule which produces the stalk or tube. Then when the frustule self-divides, several are formed, either side by side, or each may project a new stalk ;: but seldom with much reg- ularity. Now every frustule and valve arising from the same spore must be precisely alike, being all formed from the original frustule by repeated self-division; and as self-division merely repeats the same identical form or variety, it is not easy to understand how it is possi- ble to have two varieties of form on the same stipes. If there be no mistake on your part, you will overturn all the present views of the production of new frustules and valves. It is more easy to suppose | that a frustule from another stipes had become agglutinated to the stipes. But as you say you have sent some in:a bottle, I will examine Edwards.] 216 [February 9, it with care when it arrives. Every spore may produce a different variety, but it is not easy to understand that the same spore, or stipes, can give rise to different varieties. As for the two species (G. con- strictum and capitatum) I have never been satisfied that they are dis- tinct, and probably G. herculaneum is another variety.” For my part, from the mode in which the two new valves are formed within and between the two old ones, when self-division takes place, I can readily understand how a great variation in both outline and sculpture can occur. In this case the two forms have exactly the same sculpture, and the difference between them merely lies in the outline of the valve. From my knowledge of how greatly this char- acter varies in the Diatomacez, I, from an early period in my studies, considered these two supposed species to be but forms of one, and this discovery proves that my surmises were correct; at some future time I may have something to say with regard to the genus Gomphonema, and what, in my judgment, constitutes a species in it. I am now en- gaged, and have been for some years, working up several genera, with the express purpose of determining the true lines of specific distinc- tion in them. And I must be permitted to here enter my earnest protest against the custom which has become so wofully common, in England more especially, of manufacturing species where they do not exist. The labors of such self-supposed students of nature are more than thrown away. Our books become crowded with worthless synonyms, ‘and this branch of biology has, in consequence, fallen into disrepute among scientific observers generally. If those who have the oppor- tunity of securing and examining specimens of Diatomacee, would only study them a little more carefully, and if they must publish, do so only after properly maturing their knowledge, we might hope ‘to learn something of the life history of these strange atomies. Better that really new species should forever remain unnamed, than that such contributions,to the literature of the Diatomacee, as appear from time to time in foreign journals, should ever see the light. Itisa curious fact that almost every one who becomes possessed of a micro- scope of sufficiently high magnifying power, at once imagines that he is abundantly armed and equipped, as well as qualified, to attack and overcome the most difficult problems in biology. Hence we find the most startling discoveries put forth by very immature observers of nature who suppose themselves to be students, but who have really given little time or thought to study. No branch of biology, perhaps, 1870. OTT (Edwards, has been more cursed with supposed discoverers of this class than the Diatomacez, until a man comes to be appreciated by the number of species he can manufacture. By far the largest number of observers who are attracted to these beautiful and wonderful atomies forget that we have in them presented to us for investigation one of the most puzzling problems in the whole group of phenomena, illustrating that which we call life, but on the contrary appear to consider them as “simple organisms,’’ whose morphology and life history, as well as classification, are therefore proportionally easy of comprehension. I have devoted many years to the earnest study, under varying condi- tions, of these examples of complex simplicity, and pity it is that others who have not spent so much time over this branch of organic exist- ence should not have been so fortunate as I was in possessing a wise and patient counsellor in the late Dr. Walker Arnott. I can truly say that had it not been for his invaluable friendly advice, I, too, would have doubtless ranged myself with the manufacturers of species and synonym accumulators. Often. have the kindly words he has written me made me pause ere I, as he pithily remarked, “ rushed into print” with supposed discoveries, which I would have been ashamed of thereafter. Dr. Arnott says “a microscopist looks on everything as subservient to the microscope, and that whatever he sees, and which appears distinct to the eye, he thinks ought to be de- scribed or figured as distinct. I am, on the other hand, a naturalist, a botanist in particular, and use the microscope, simple or compound, as a necessary evil, merely to enable my eyes to see better minute structures, but whether these differences amount to specific or generic importance, or are only peculiar forms of one species, is the result of analogy, a mental process which can only be attained by a training in botany in all its branches, for many years.” Natural objects, like the Diatomacez, which can only be seen after they are magnified several thousand times, and then only under peculiar circumstances of illu- mination, must be difficult of comprehension, even if their life history were much more simple and more easily studied than it is. I cannot too strongly caution the intending student of this enticing branch against trusting to a few and hasty observations made upon the dead skeleton of the plant. It is only when they-are studied in the living state that the Diatomacez can be understood, and even then only with difficulty. But one more abstract from my note book and I must draw these remarks toa close. In the early part of November, 1868, I made a Edwards.] 218 [February 9, collection of Colletonema vulgare, and for some time have been abie to keep it alive in a bottle so as to study its peculiarities. And here let me say that many minute forms of both animal and vegetable life which I have been unable to rear otherwise, I have found to flourish in phials with small necks, or those with large ones, which have the aperture partly stopped with a loose cover of some kind. It would seem that the gases given off from the human body, and accumulat- ing in dwelling rooms, in which I have kept specimens, are deleterious to these small forms, and the partial closing of the vessel prevents, to a great extent, their entrance. My specimens of Colletonema flourished finely and grew considerably. I have been thus enabled to watch them, as I may say, building their tubes; this species, consisting of naviculzform frustules enclosed and freely swimming about in tubes, after the manner of Schizonema. In fact there is nothing to separate these genera, except that the first inhabits fresh water, whilst the latter is an inhabitant of the sea, where it is to be found generally in profusion, covering larger alge and rocks. The extension of the tube takes places after the following manner. As the frustules increase by the process of subdivision common to all of the Diatomacez, of course the two frustules thus formed occupy double the space of one, and as the cell division is continually going on, after a time the tube must become choked with individuals. At this period in their existence they appear to be extremely active, moving with increased rapidity up and down the tube as freely as their crowded condition will permit. Whether the end of the tube is never closed, or opens at certain sea- sons, I have been unable to determine; at all events it is now found to be open, and the frustules slip over each other until they reach this opening, and one or two will project outside as if prospecting, and will occasionally return within the general envelope. When a frustule thus projects from the open end of the tube, it never, as far as I have seen, rushes onward with the vigorous motion with which it moves within the envelope, but this is doubtless only so when the tube is being lencthened. It can be easily understood that if the species be disseminated by the distribution of perfect frustules, as seems to be most likely, that they must then escape from the tube after the manner I have recorded above as taking place in the allied genus, Schizonema. When one or two frustules have projected from the open end of the tube, they often immediately come to a rest just beyond the tube, or do so after moving over each other slowly outside of, but in a line with, the tube. While at rest there appears to form around 1870.] 219 (Edwards. them a transparent mucous sheath, which, so that it may not fix them in their position, is kept in a tube form by the frustules again moving over each other, and thus, as it were, fashioning and smooth- ing the inside of the tube. This sheath becomes more and more dense, until it is plainly visible as forming an elongation of the tube, when the frustules again project from the end, and a new portion is added. I have in this way seen a tube grow across the field of the microscope, and the closely packed frustules extend themselves in single file, each just overlapping those in front and behind it. The membrane constituting the tube, although dense and strong, is some- what elastic, but not very much so, for I have seen three or four frus- tules become wedged together by one attempting to pass backwards, whilst the others were moving forwards, and at such times the tube does not stretch to accommodate the crowding, but yet is often bent by the force of the moving frustules. In fact this force must be con- siderable, as is evidenced by the size of the obstacles, as grains of sand, which a small Diatom will move; and in Colletonema I have seen the tough tube membrane bent inwards so as almost to collapse by such a crowding as I have mentioned. As I have mentioned Mr. Kitton’s paper in Science Gossip, I must here take the opportunity of saying something in regard to that article, and I feel sure that ,he will not take amiss what I shall.say when he understands the spirit in which it is written. First, 1 wish it to be understood that the specimens and the letter accompanying them were sent to Dr. Arnott for his opinion; there- after I intended to publish the facts treated of myself. However, as Mr. Kitton has made public his opinions on the specimens, I will now give mine; but the fact of its being a private letter of mine from which he quctes, and one never meant to be made public, must ex- plain what I there say. He has considered the “ queer form” to be a new fragillaria, and has named it crotenensis. Evidently he does not agree with that portion of my letter which he quotes, when I say: “Tam not in favor of naming forms after places or persons, but strongly incline to distinctive and descriptive names.” If the form were a new species I should have named it myself; but Dr. Arnott at once said it was likely to be Fragillaria capucina var. y, and such I see Mr. Roper points it out to be, in the July number of the same periodical. As it may be of interest in connection with this point, I may say that in a previous specimen of the, sediment from the Croton water Atwood.]} 220 {February 16, which I had sent him, Dr. Arnott informed me he had found the fol- lowing species: Cymatopleura elliptica, Navicula trinedis, and gibber- ula, Surirella craticula, Denticula obtusa, Epithemia zebrina, Cocconeis Thwaitesi, Achnanthes ventricosa, Cyclotellarotula and operculata, Or- thosira orichalcea, Gomphonema tencllum, and another intermediate between dichotomum and intricatum, most likely the latter. February 16, 1870. Vice President, Mr. T. T. Bouvé, in the chair. Forty persons present. Capt. N. E. Atwood presented, on behalf of Capt. Gideon Bowley, a broken skull of a walrus taken from a depth of several fathoms in the Gulf of St. Lawrence. Capt. Atwood stated that tusks of this animal were found, not infrequently, on the beaches of the Magdalen ‘Islands, and the living ani- mals were reported by seafaring men to have ‘been seen there one hundred years ago. The Secretary communicated the following vote passed at a recent meeting of the Trustees of the Museum of Compar- ative Zoology. Resolved, — That the money presented to the Museum of Comparative Zodlogy by the Boston Society of Natural History to found the “Humboldt Scholarship,” be gratefully accepted under the conditions laid down by the vote of the Council of said Society, at a meeting held November 17, 1869; and that the Secretary be directed to return thanks for this liberal gift. 1870.} 991 [Scudder. March 2, 1870. Vice President, Dr. C. T. Jackson, in the ehair. Thirty nine persons present. The following papers were presented : — DESCRIPTION OF THE LARVA AND CHRYSALIS OF PApiLio Rv- TuLus Boisp., oF CALIFORNIA. By SAaAmMvuEL H. ScuppER. By the kindness of Mr. Henry Edwards of San Francisco, I have been favored with two specimens of the chrysalis of Papilio Rutulus Boisd., of California, and with a colored drawing of the full-grown eaterpillar, made by Mr. R. H. Stretch; their resemblance to the early stages of our common P. Turnus gives them an additional interest to entomologists of the Eastern States, and I therefore publish the following descriptions from the material above mentioned. Larva resembling perfectly in form and general appearance that of P. Turnus ; the general tint of both head and body apple green, but the last two segments above, and the postericr third of the body at the sides, become gradually much paler: thoracic segments tinged above with purplish, the third segment with a dorso-lateral, transverse, double, circular spot, each portion formed of a minute yellow spot, encircled with black; also with a small, round, distant, subdorsal, yel- lowish spot; fourth segment with a small, square, dorso-lateral and a small, round, distant, subdorsal, dark blue spot; the suture between the fourth and fifth segments is bordered rather broadly around half of the upper portion of the body with a bicolored band, terminating squarely at the end; in front of the suture it is yellow, behind, blackish blue. The stigmata are marked with blue, and there isa -subdorsal and lateral row of blue dots on the seventh to the tenth segments. Prolegs paler than the general hue of the body. Length, when contracted, 35.5 mill. Chrysalis. The two specimens referred to differ greatly in size and color, the larger one having brownish grey and blackish fuscous, the smaller apple green and yellowish brown markings. There is a rather broad stigmatal band, commencing at the tip of the ab- domen, and continuing forward along the hinder edge of the wings to the eye, of a blackish fuscous or yellowish brown color; spiracles of the color of the band; a very broad dorsal band of the same color, but paler in tint, and especially so, anterior to the mesonotal Shaler.] OD, [March 2, tubercle, on the metanotum and the first abdominal segment, and quite obscured by pale on the terminal two or three segments; in the brighter specimen this band is edged faintly with white; space be- tween these either dull white, clouded and streaked with yellowish fuscous or apple green, the abdominal segments with a few short, longitudinal, delicate, black dashes; abdominal tubercles black; wings either blackish fuscous, paler externally, the base of the veins streaked with black, and the tips of the nervules with a black dot; or apple green, the base of the veins marked with pale dull yellowish edged with black, the base of the nervules marked delicately with black, and the wartlets at tip of nervules pale dull yellowish; whole front of abdomen either dirty white, more or less obscured and streaked with fuscous and blackish next wing tips; or whitish, slightly tinged or dotted occasionally with green or black. Legs, antenne and tongue blackish fuscous, or mingled green and yellowish brown, streaked slightly with black; palpal prominences brownish fuscous, the sides paler, or green, above and within yellowish brown; sides of pronotal tubercle wood brown, or yellowish brown. Compared with P. Turnus, the lateral shoulder tubercles are slightly more prominent, the excision between the palpal prominences a little deeper, and the mesonotal tubercle very much larger; the subdorsal abdominal tuber- cles are also slightly more developed, and there is, in addition, a lateral row of minute tubercles. Length 27.5-36 mill. Height 7.5-9 mill. Length of mesonotal tubercle 2- 2.75 mill.; distance of tips of palpal prominences apart 4.5-—5 mill. ON THE PHOSPHATE BEDS oF SoutTH CAROLINA. By N. 8S. SHALER. The following paper on the phosphate marls of the shore region of South Carolina, contains a partial account of the observations made upon this district by the author, while under the employ of the United States Coast Survey, and is published with the permission of the Superintendent of the Survey, Prof. Benj. Pierce of Cambridge. A portion of the conclusions have a certain commercial as well as scientific value, and it was deemed by the Superintendent desirable to place them before the public at the earliest opportunity. The re- mainder of the description of these beds will be found in the report of the work of the Coast Survey for 1870. 1870.} 223 | [Shaler. Physical Geography of the Phosphate Region. The physical geography of the area occupied by the phosphate beds is so important, not only to a proper understanding of the his- tory of their formation, but also to a right appreciation of their economic value, that it will be well to set it forth briefly before we consider the beds themselves. The coast of the United States between the parallels of 25° and 35° north latitude, forms a shallow and very regular westward curve. The depth of this bight is about two hundred miles, and the width of the opening measured from Cape Hatteras its northernmost, to Cape Florida its southernmost point, is not far from six hundred miles. The land which bounds this great indentation is quite level for a distance of some tens of miles from the shore, rarely rising more than seyenty five feet above the tide level within this belt. The character of the shore along this great Bay of the Carolinas ! varies very remark- ably, considering the little variety of vertical relief found there. From Cape Hatteras southward for a distance of about two hundred miles, the shore is bordered by a peculiar series of low islands, dis- posed in the fashion of a barrier reef. Along this whole shore the sands which comprise the outer islands seem to be in constant move- ment, the gaps between the islands changing their positions from year to year. The observations of the Coast Survey have given very valuable data for the study of these peculiar reefs, but it is not nec- essary for us to examine their history. South of Cape Fear we pass beyond this system of barriers and come upon a section of shore which differs in no important regard from the usual type of low shore on which the sea is slowly gaining. This second section of the Bay of the Carolinas has a length of about one hundred miles, extending from Cape Fear to Cape Roman. ‘The whole coast from Cape Hat- teras to Cape Roman forms three great indentations. The northern- most of these, sometimes known as Raleigh Bay, is entirely formed by the narrow ridge of the sand reef which separates the ocean from the broad water of Pamlico Sound. Immediately on the south of Raleigh Bay lies Onslow Bay, which shows along the whole coast line the same structure which we find in Raleigh Bay, but somewhat less distinctly. South of the southern point of this Bay we find less and 1Not being able to find any name for this remarkable feature of our continent, I have ventured to give it this one, in order to avoid the difficulties arising from the want of designation. Snaler.] 224 _ [March 2, less of this barrier reef, until, as before remarked, the coast returns to the ordinary type of a low wasting shore. Continuing southward beyond this monotonous coast we find, at about twenty miles north of Cape Roman, the beginning of a new type of coast. Instead of barrier reef, with a considerable expanse of open water between it and the shore, the coast begins to be penetrated with long tide water creeks which cut up the shore region in an irregular manner. From Cape Roman to Charleston this character becomes more and more pro- nounced. From Charleston southwards as far as the mouth of the St. Johns River, in Florida, a distance of nearly two hundred miles, the coast for a depth of from five to twenty miles is intersected by these arms of the sea to such an extent that at many points the islands form two or three successive tiers. These tide water channels are to be counted by thousands, and vary from a few feet wide to sounds like the Broad River at Port Royal, which has a width of two or three miles. The general appearance of such a shore is not unlike what is seen on the northern part of the coast of this Continent within the limits of what has been termed the fiord zone. The complication of out- line along the Carolina and Georgia sea border quite equals any thing which can be found on the shore of Maine or Labrador. A careful comparison of the details of the topography of any region in the fiord zone with what we find on this southern coast will show some essential differences. The maps of the Coast Survey for the island region of Maine, if compared with those of the sea islands, show the features in question very clearly, and the reader is referred to them for the character of the topography of these areas, if he has not had an opportunity of studying it in the field. The most important of these differences is that the main channels of the fiord regions always run perpendicular to the shore, while in the sea islands the channels approximately parallel to the coast are more numerous than those which are perpendicular toit. It is evident that no such scouring as is brought about by glacial streams could have excavated the tor- tuous channels of the sea island region, for to have produced such water ways the ice currents would have had a move parallel to the shore; which is clearly impossible. It is by no means easy to understand just how this peculiar com- plication of the shore has been produced, but there are some fea- tures in its structure which seem to throw a little light upon the question. Throughout the sea island region the attentive observer may see that the surface of the ground is disposed in long, wave-like 1870.] 225 [Shaler. undulations, the summits of which are generally parallel to the shore. On the innermost of the islands the action of the weather has partly obliterated these reliefs, but over a large part of the territory they are still quite conspicuous.} On St. Helena Island they are peculiarly distinct, for the valleys between the summits of the ridges, though they are only a few feet deep, are still depressed enough to convert their bases into swamps, so that the alternation of upland and morass in parallel lines charac-: terizes a large part of the surface of this and the adjoining islands. It is clear, on even a casual inspection, that these reliefs are not the product of aérial erosion; their channels are rarely occupied by streams; indeed, one may travel for days among these islands without seeing any indication of subaérial erosion, except from tidal currents wearing away some low cliff. There can be no doubt that this con- tour of surface is due to submarine forces, and that the essential features of the topography of this region were impressed upon it before it came out of the sea. Something of this same character of surface may be found beneath the level of the ocean along this coast, though it is at no point so clearly traceable as on the surface of the islands. ‘There can be httle doubt that these ridges and furrows are due to the run of tidal currents along the shore. ‘There seems to be a tendency in streams not bounded by resisting banks, such as the tidal streams which course along a shallow shore, to arrange the ma- terial they sweep over in long ridges. Such a stream does not always press equally upon its floor, but is apt to have a banded character, or to have a form which may be compared to several streams flowing side by side, and closely joined with each other. Just what this is owing to it is not easy to say, but it seems not altogether improbable that the peculiar alternate strips of hot and cold water noticed in the Gulf Stream by the officers of the Coast Survey, may be due to the same or a related cause. The action of currents of air upon in- coherent vapor in the atmosphere forming the banded clouds called by sailors mares’ tails, may possibly be due to the same tendency. In order to understand just how the sea acted upon this surface as it began to be lifted above it, it must be noticed that although the _ tides at Cape Hatteras or Cape Florida are not more than two feet in 1] am much indebted to Capt. C.O. Boutelle, of the U. S. Coast Survey, for information on many points connected with the topography of this region, both subaérial and submarine, and especially for having called my attention to these parallel ridges on Hiltcn Head Island. 40 PROCEEDINGS B. 8. N. H.—VOL. XIII. 15 APRIL, 1869. Shaler.] 296 [March 2, height, they steadily increase as we go nearer to the centre of the Bay, until at Fort Pulaski, at the mouth of the Savannah River, they are over seven feet in height. This heaping up of the tide in this bay may be entirely due to the usual action of converging shores upon the tidal wave which flows into the bay they form; though it does not seem as if the indentation was sufficiently deep to produce so great an effect. If we go back to the time when this shore began to emerge from the sea, it will be seen that where the tide was of considerable height it would tend to sweep around the low islands formed by the upper part of the ridges before described, and to dig out the incoherent sands which formed the bottom of the troughs between them. As the shore gradually rose higher these water ways would be more de- fined; but if there was an extensive tide water surface left, the scour- ing action would be quite decided, and these channels might in time acquire considerable depth. A careful reconnaissance of the shore between Capes Hatteras and Florida will show the observer that the Sea Island topography begins where the tide rises above about four feet, and becomes more and more marked as we go towards regicns where the tide becomes higher and higher, or in other words, that m a general way the amount of complication of outline of the shore line is proportionate to the height of the tide. | | Geological History of the South Carolina Coast Region. The physical geography of this region affords the key to its geo- logical history, or to that portion of it, at least, which has given it the character it has at present. But to understand the more remote history of this region we must go back to a time when the shore line was at least two hundred miles west of its present position. At the close of the Cretaceous era the shore of this southeastern border of the continent lay near to the base of the Alleghany Mountains. The uplifts at the close of the Eocene probably carried the shore line some distance to the eastward, but just how far it is not easy to say, as subsequent wearing action has destroyed a part of the record. The elevation which closed the Miocene seems to have been far greater than that which_came at the end of the preceding period. It appears as if the shore line must have come at some points, es- pecially on the southern part of South Carolina, nearly as far east as the present coast. 1870.] OF iShaler. The last considerable change of level which this shore has expe- rienced eame at the close of the Pliocene era. It seems likely that thi§ uplift carried the shore line much to the eastward of its present position. The whole of the sea island belt is being worn away by the ocean at a quite rapid rate. The scouring action of the powerful tidal currents which flow through the fiords between the islands, tears away a great deal of the materials over which they sweep. Along the whole sea island belt from Winyah Bay, just north of Cape Roman; to the mouth of the St. John River, in Florida, this erosive action has resulted im the production of a broad, slightiy submerged table land, having an average width of about eight miles, and an average submergence of about three fathoms. This table of sands is very well shown on the sailing chart of the U. S. Coast Survey, sheet 3d. The outer part of this bank probably marks the position of the shore at the close of the last uplift; that which created the sea island re- gion. We shall soon see reasons for supposing that this must have been an exceedingly recent occurrence in the geological sense cf that ‘word. Wherever one of the great tide water streams, such as the Edisto, the Coosa, or the Broad River, debouches into the sea, the coast chart shows that the sands swept out by it have built a delta which reaches beyond the table sands, and some distance out into the deeper water beyond. lt is very probable that the coast line was once much further out to sea than the border of this three fathom deep shoal would indicate. If the reader will attentively notice the way in which the Gulf Stream runs after it leaves the straits of Florida, he will perceive that it is thrown with great violence against a part of the coast of the Bay of the Carolinas. Its current, with a velocity of two to four miles per hour, strikes against the bottom of the sea in 31°, where the water has a depth of only one hundred fathoms. From this point nearly to Cape Hatteras, or for most of the length of the Bay of the Carolinas, this stream probably touches the bottom on its inside border. There can be no doubt that this stream must exercise a certain wearing action against this part of the slope of the continent. A river having the velocity of the Gulf Stream at this point, or a tidal current, such as may be observed in our harbors, is capable of taking up and removing considerable quantities of detritus. Whatever ero- sive force the Gulf Stream may have at present, there is a great probability that in the immediate geological past its action on this Shaler. 998 [March 2, shore must have been quite powerful. It has been clearly shown by Professor Agassiz that the Florida coral reefs are but the last stages in the building of that great natural breakwater, and that the whole peninsula is probably the product of the work of the existing species of polyps and acalephs, working during the last geological period. If this be so, then it follows that before the erection of the Florida mole the Gulf Stream must have swept against the shore of the Carolinas in a more direct way than it does at present. The removal of the southern half of Florida would certainly increase the violence with which the stream presses against the Carolina shore. There is, furthermore, no doubt that the region swept by the inner edge of the Gulf Stream is composed of materials calculated to wear very rapidly when submitted to the action of a current of water. Al- though these considerations are not calculated to give us any decided assurance concerning the part which the Gulf Stream has played in the erosion of this shore, they still make it probable that it has had no unimportant share in the shaping of the coast. It may be remarked, in passing, that there seems to be no clear evidence of recent subsidence on this coast. 1am satisfied that the many facts which seem to indicate such action, and which have even deceived the remarkably acute Sir Charles Lyell, are really to be attributed to a variety of minor accidents, such as the undermining of the coast by the action of the waves, or to the rotting away of a considerable thickness of vegetable matter beneath the surface of the ground. This view of the meaning of these supposed evidences of subsidence is ably defended by Professor Tuomey in his report on the Geology of South Carolina. The Geology of the Phosphate Beds. The effort to identify accurately the formations of North America with those of Europe has led in some cases to the hasty use of the names which have been applied to certain beds in the European sec- tions, to designate American rocks. In the nomenclature of the South Carolina beds, we have what 1 Dr. Ravenel thinks that he has recognized the phosphate beds at the depth of about sixty feet below the surface, at Charleston. If this should be verified, we would be compelled, as will be seen hereafter, to suppose that after the formation of the phosphate bed under atmospheric agencies, the shore had been depressed to the depth of at least sixty feet below its present position. It would be difficult to account for such a great subsidence at this point, while beds at a distance of nine miles to the westward have not changed their position. 1870. 229 {Shaler. seems to be an instance of this confusion of names. In the largest work which has yet been published on the geology of this region, the “ Report on the Geology of South Carolina, by Mr. Tuomey,” the tertiary rocks of the State are divided into Eocene, Miocene and Pliocene, to suit the then newly proposed classification of Sir Charles Lyell. The Eocene tertiary is described as occurring in two differ- ent regions in two widely varying conditions. In the western part of the State the section shows, first, beds of sandstone and grit; second, beds of sand, gravel, and colored clays; third, siliceous clay; fourth, silicified shells; fifth, beds of sand and iron ore. In the shore region a great thickness of tolerably uniform marls is assumed as the equiva- lent of this varied formation, the apparently not unreasonable view of Mr. Tuomey being, that the difference in the position of these two ‘regions relative to the shore, has caused .the difference in the physical character of the beds. The organic contents of the supposed identi- cal beds in the east and west regions of the State, are as varied as are their physical features. The fossils of the buhr-stone or western beds, named in the list of Tuomey, are almost all Gasteropods and Lamellibranchiates. The general character of these shells may be accepted as rather more like the Eocene of Europe than any other member of the tertiary series there, but their horizon has been deter- mined, not by the comparison of the resemblances of the species, but by the fact that all the species found in this association are extinct. But although there is no apparent reason to question the position assigned to the buhr-stone formation, there must be doubt concern- ing the position of the beds of the shore region, which are placed as contemporaneous with it. We have in the Santee beds an assem- blage of fossils very different from those occurring in the buhr-stone, and containing species such as the Zeuglodon cetoides, differing widely from anything found in the latter formation. Still further to the east we have again in the marls of the Ashley and Cooper Rivers other physical conditions, and an assemblage of fossils which it is difficult to believe could have been deposited in the same geological period as buhr-stone fossils. Nor can we suppose that the one series of rocks was deposited far inland, and the other near shore, for in the Ashley beds, as remarked by Mr. Tuomey, the character of the fossils shows clearly that they could not have been deposited far from the sea border. There does not seem the same reason for questioning the identity of the Santee beds, and those found along the borders of the Ashley Shaler.] 230 [March 2, and the Cooper Rivers, that there is to doubt the identity of the age of the latter beds and the buhr-stone. The identity of the first named beds does not seem to be sufficiently proven; the contempora- neous origin of the last named is at first sight so improbable that it cannot be accepted without direct proof, which has not been pre- sented. The Jevel character of a large part of the surface over which these beds in question extend, makes it extremely difficult to trace by natural sections the relations of these several series of rocks. The paleontological evidence not being clear, the matter must re- main in some doubt until we have artificial sections which artesian wells, tapping the abundant subterranean waters of this region, will doubtless soon give. Overlying the Santee beds and the beds of the Ashley and Cooper Rivers, there are found at various points marls which are probably to be regarded as of a Pliocene age. This is the age assigned to them by Mr. Tuomey, and if we must make a division of the tertiary sec- tion, assigning a part to each of these three names, Eocene, Miocene, and Pliocene, there seems no reason to protest against the term, The extent of country covered by these beds is so small, and their disposition so irregular, that it seems necessary to suppose that a great amount of erosion has acted upon the surface, and that only patches of the formation as it once existed, have remained to the present day. These beds are of great value to us, however, merely as evidence of long continued exposure of the low lands of this part of the Atlantic shore. The bed of phosphate of lime which we have been preparing to study, lies immediately on top of the “marls of the Ashley and Cooper Rivers,” as they have been generally termed, though these beds are not limited to the basins of these streams. The whole of the workable material lies in a single bed, from six inches to three feet in thickness. Although it varies in its chemical and fossil com- ponents, it retains everywhere certain marked features. It is always more or less nodular; the nodules vary much in size, some being no larger than a pea, some a foot or more in diameter. These nodules contain, generally, one or more fragments of shells or corals, appar- ently all Eocene species, which seem to have been the ageregating points of the matter contained in the nodule. So far as my knowl- edge goes, there have been few, if any, nodules foand containing traces of vertebrate remains. Many of the nodules show traces of wearing, not exactly what would be expected from their being rolled as by a 1870.) 931 [Shaler. stream, but the style of wear which comes from being stamped and trodden on. The appearance of the worn surfaces reminds me of that seen on fragments of bone from Big Bone Lick, which have been ground by the trampling of the en pachyderms and ruminants which frequented that swamp. Sometimes these nodules do not make up more than a considerable fraction of the bed, the remainder being sand, pebbles, or the marl of the character found on the bed beneath. Again, the nodules are so crowded in the bed that they are soldered together into one mass, with scarce any interspaces between the separate concretions. Mingled withthe concretions there is found a very variable quantity of fossi! vertebrate remains; by far the greater part of these consist of exceedingly worn fragments of cetacean bones and sharks’ teeth and vertebra, both clearly of the same species as those found lower down in the marls in the same section. Mingled with these, but comparatively rarely found, are the bones of a fossil horse, pig, mas- todon, and bones and utensils of man. These last named fossils are almost always in a state of preservation, widely different from that of the remains of the cetaceans and selachians with which they are mineled. ‘Their appearance indicates a comparatively recent inhu- mation. Chemical analysis shows us that the nodules of this deposit contain the greatest quantity of phosphate of lime, the quantity varying at — different points from forty to nearly seventy per cent. The first and most natural seeming explanation of the large amount of this salt, is that it is derived from the bones and excrements of the animals whose remains are found in the bed. But the points where the most bones are found are not those where the phosphate deposit is thickest or richest. At Chisholm’s Island, on the waters of St. Helena Sound, where the bed has the greatest development yet discovered, and where the analysis shows more phosphoric acid than at some of the localities the richest in bones, the remains of vertebrate animals are very rarely found. It is not too much to say that at this locality not one part in ten thousand of the mass’ is composed of vertebrate re- mains. Nor can we assume that the mass of phosphoric acid has been furnished by the decay of bones which have been utterly broken down; in that case we should have the remaining bones showing all degrees of preservation. This, however, is not the case; the frag- ments, though usually much worn, retain their structure very well. Although I went upon the ground with a disposition to regard the Shaler.] 932 [March 2, beds as the result of the decay of vertebrate remains, the general character of the deposit soon compelled me to seek some other ex- planation of its origin. It has been suggested by a distinguished chemist that the deposit was the result of the submergence of a great guano area, during which submergence the bones of marine animals became mingled with the mass. There are several objections to this view: in the first place, no remains of birds have been found in the deposit, though fossils quite as likely to be destroyed, are well preserved there. Then it is difficult to see how in the immediate past this swampy shore could have been the breeding place of the quantities of birds which would have been required to have accumulated these phosphates, nor could we suppose that the climate of this shore could have been at the time of the deposition of the phosphates so different from what it is at present, as would have been required to produce the dry condi- tions essential to the accumulation of a guano deposit. There is another view of the origin of these phosphate beds, which, so far as my knowledge goes, has not yet been suggested, and which, it seems to me, solves a part of the difficulties. The phosphate layer rests upon a mass of marl containing a num- ber of fossils which are found in a worn condition mingled with the phosphate nodules. The analyses of Dr. St. Julien Ravenel have shown that at several points beneath the phosphate beds the marl contains several per cent. of phosphate of lime, and it may be as- sumed as eminently probable that the whole of the marl beneath the region where the phosphate beds occur, contains a certain quantity of this material, mingled with the carbonate of lime which constitutes the mass. Now it is. a well known fact that water containing car- bonic acid gas in solution has a solvent action upon both these salts of lime, but that its power is greatest on the carbonate of lime. So that a mass of marl containing both these materials, submitted to the action of water charged with carbonic acid, might have the carbonate of lime entirely removed, and the mass left behind when the solving action ceased, might consist almost altogether of the phosphate of lime. . ! If we look a moment at the conditions which prevail in the phos- phate region, we shall see that with this view we can easily frame an explanation of the formation of this phosphate layer. The usual section through these beds gives us cn top a layer of vegetable matter 1870.] 933 [Shaler. and soil containing humus, through which the water percolating be- comes charged with carbonic acid; then the phosphate layer; immedi- ately beneath that the marl containing phosphates, which is only slightly permeable to water. Soaking over this marl the water be- _ comes charged with carbonate of lime and some phosphate which it carries away in the drainage system of the country. This process, going on for centuries, gradually dissolves away a great thickness of the marl, and gives, as in the capping bed, an accumulation made up of fossils from the wasted beds, which resisted decay, and could not be washed away; of phosphates which became aggregated into nodules; of remains of man and other recent animals, which, falling in the swamp, sank through the soft bog and became trampled in among the nodules by the living animals which inhabited this low land. Great freshets might lay down several feet of clay and sand, or some rearranged marl on top of the phosphate layer, thus confusing the record, by making the remains of man and extinct animals asso- ciated with his early history in this region, seem a part of the ancient marl beds. Looking upon the phosphate layer as the debris of a large amount of eroded marl, it is no longer a difficult matter to account for the association of fossils found there, which would be inexplicable with- out some theory of this kind. Although this view of the derivation of the phosphate beds capping the Ashley River marls seems to clear away a part of the doubt which hides their origin, it discloses another question which is about as diffi- cult to settle. If we are to derive the phosphates from the marl, in what manner are we to account for the preseucze of this material in the latter beds? I cannot say that I feel any great satisfaction in tie explanation which I am about to offer, which after all is only half an explanation; but inasmuch as it promises to cast some light on what is a rather dark subject, I venture to present it. It may be premised that the whole. question of the formation of phosphates is one of the little understood provinces of geological in- quiry. ‘The usual supposition of the vertebrate origin of these accu- mulations does not fit some of the most conspicuous examples, and the ingenious hypothesis of the able chemist and geologist, Mr. T. Sterry Hunt, which accounts for the erigin of the massive apatite beds of the early paleozoic by the action of quantities of unarticulated Brachiopods, separating phosphate of lime from the water of the sea, though doubiless a true cause, is not competent toexplain many cases Shaler. ] 934 ? {March 2, of the oceurrence of materials containing phosphoric acid in some of its combinations. The tolerably uniform dissemination of phosphate of lime through the marl beneath the phosphates cannot be explained on any theory of the formation of such deposits that has come under my observation. The general character of the marl underlying the phosphates is quite different from what would be supposed from the fact that it contains numerous vertebrate remains. It does not seem to have been a de- posit formed near the shore, but rather to have been the product of those agents of deposition which work in the deeper parts of the sea. It was my good fortune to see some of the material brought up from , the floor of the Gulf Stream between Florida and Cuba, from a depth of nearly two hundred fathoms; the resemblance of the general char- acter of this material to the marls beneath the phosphate bed is quite striking. It is by no means improbable that at the time when these beds beneath the phosphate bed were being accumulated, the Gulf Stream flowed over them. The peninsula of Florida did not then exist, and the natural path of the stream must have been just over the region of the Ashley River beds. The material brought up by the Coast Survey dredging work un- der the direction of Count Pourtales, consisting, as has just been stated, of a marly substance, resembling in a general way the marls of the Ashley and Cooper Rivers, has recently been subjected to analysis, and strange to relate, it, too, contains a considerable amount of phosphoric acid. The analyses are not yet complete, but will in due time be made public by the officer having these dredgings in charge; but enough is known to make it sure that the chemical character of the material now accumulating on the bottom of the Gulf Stream, is likely to show a surprising likeness to that which was laid down on the sea floor where the Ashley and Cooper Rivers’ beds were formed. It is not the least singular part of the likeness of the materials on the Gulf Stream floor to the beds beneath the phosphates, that there, too, vertebrate remains abound. The dredge of Count Pourtales brought up from the bottom of the stream a considerable number of fragments of the. bones of the dugong, or some allied animal. It. might at first sight seem as if the occurrence of these bones afiorded a sufficient explanation of the presence of phosphoric acid in the material composing the floor of the Gulf Stream, but here, as on the Ashley and Cooper River marls, it would be necessary to suppose 1870.] 235 [Shaler. \ that a large part of the sediment falling on that floor (probably at least one third of the mass) was the product of vertebrate animals. This is clearly by no means a probable supposition. We know that some of the pteropod mollusks, forms which are frequently abundant in the ocean at great distances from the land, have a composition not materially different from that of bones. It has even been stated, though I do not yet know by what authority, that some of the marine alge contain a large per cent. of phosphate of lime. The fact of the existence of this material in a number of the inferior organizations of the sea makes it, in most cases, more reasonable to account for the formation of extensive masses of phos- phate beds by the deposition of the remains of invertebrate species, than to suppose that they were accumulated by vertebrate animals. If the foregoing view of the process by which the phosphate beds of South Carolina were formed be correct, then we may draw the im- portant conclusion, important at least in an economic point of view, that wherever the phosphate-containing marls of the South Atlantic sea board lie in a position similar to that which they occupy in the vicinity of Charleston, the bed of nodular phosphate is likely to be found. The United States Coast Survey is about undertaking a eareful examination of the region where it is likely that these beds may be found. So that this important source of wealth, not only to the States where it occurs, but to the whole country, may not want for that aid in its development which it may aes be expected the government should give. There can be no doubt that the area of the nodular phosphates is much underestimated, though how great a part of the region where they occur contains the material in workable quantities, may remain a questionable matter. It seems likely that the peculiar advantages of these beds will ena- ble them for a long time to control the market for phosphates, at least in this country. ‘They are over great areas, scarcely covered by the soil, so that the labor of excavating is small. The beds are, in most cases, remarkably accessible, on account of the peculiar sys- tem of lagoons which intersect the coast. Furthermore, the supply lies in a region which, more than any other in the world, is likely to require a large amount of fertilizing material of this character, to balance the waste brought about by the exportation of raw agricul tural products. Putnam.} 236 {March 16, Nore. — It is a pleasure to me to acknowledge my obligation to Dr. St. Julien Ravenel for the great assistance kindly rendered by him during my examina- ‘tion of the South Carolina beds; he, having been the first to see the commer- cial value of these beds and a constant student of their features since their discovery, is now the person best acquainted with their phenomena. I account it a very fortunate thing that [ had his guidance over a considerable part of the region I traversed. Section of Microscopy. March 9, 1870. Dr. B. Joy Jeffries in the chair. Nine persons present. Mr. George Mixter was elected a member. My. C. Stodder exhibited a new objective of unique con- struction, made by Tolles. With its draw tube closed, it was a 3-inch; when fully drawn out, a 4-inch; it had a working distance of only 13 inches. He also remarked that Professor Eulenstein had written him that Nobert and himself had resolved the seventeenth band of Nobert’s test-plate with a 1 inch objective made by 6 Tolles ; they had been unable to do so with any other objective. March 16, 1870. Mr. William T. Brigham in the chair. Fourteen persons present. The following papers were presented :— NoTE ON THE OCCURRENCE OF EULEPTORHAMPHUS LONGIROSTRIS ON THE Coast OF MaASsACHUSETTS. By F. W. Putnam. Dr. Giinther, in his valuable “ Catalogue of the Fishes of the British Museum,” admits five distinct forms under the genus Hemi- rhamphus, which had been considered as genera by other authors. 1870.] 937 (Putnam. ‘While fully agreeing with Dr. Giinther that the teeth are too rudi- mentary it this sub-family to warrant the establishment of genera based on them alone, yet the characters afforded by the head, body and fins, appear to be sufficient to establish these groups as genera. At all events there seems to me no reason to question the generic rank of the group now under consideration; for their elongated, slender and narrowed bodies, long pectorals, short ventrals and elongated heads, give them an appearance nearly as marked from the typical Hemirhamphus Brasiliensis as is Exocetus. Prof. Valeticiennes has described two species of Hemirhamphus with very long under jaws, long bodies and long pectorals. One of these was figured by Russell, and afterwards, from a specimen re- ceived from the Bay of Bengal, by Valenciennes, in the “ Illustrated Edition of the Reene Animal,” under the name of H. longirostris, as at that time it was the only species known having an exceedingly long jaw. In the ‘“ Histoire Naturelle des Poissons,” a second species, obtained at De Peyster’s Islands (South Pacific), with a still longer under jaw, is figured and described under the name of H. macro- rhynchus. In 1859 Prof. Gill founded the genus Huleptorhamphus for a species of Hemirhamphine, with tricuspidate teeth in the lower jaw. He compares the specimen (the locality unknown) which he names E. Brevoortii, with H. macrorhynchus and H. longirostris, to which he acknowledges it to be very closely allied; but as the character of the teeth in his specimen differed from that given as existing in the two allied species, he felt warranted in considering his fish not only as a - distinct species, but also as the type of a new genus. In September, 1869, Francis Gardner, Esq., of Boston, presented to the Peabody Academy of Science a fish caught a few days pre- viously by Mr. Augustus Welcome, a fisherman at Nantucket, while fishing with a number of others off the Island. None of the fish- ermen on the Island had ever seen such a fish before, and it was given to Mr. Gardner on condition that a name and some account of it should be sent to Mr. Welcome. At the first examination I felt sure that this specimen was either H. longirostris Val., or a closely allied species. And on looking over the collection in the Academy, I was still further surprised to find two specimens of a closely allied species; one from Cayenne, Guiana, presented several years since to the Essex Institute by Capt. J. Cheever, and the other without a Putnam.] 93 8 [March 16, label. These two specimens I now refer with but slight hesitation to HH. macrorhynchus of Valenciennes. A fourth specimen of the genus was discovered in the collection of the Boston Society of Natural History, but unfortunately was without a label indicating its locality. This specimen is unquestion- ably the same species as the one from Nantucket. I have also hastily examined three specimens contained in the Museum of Comparative Zodlogy, which were collected by Mr. An- drew Garrett at Hawaii, and am satisfied, as well as one can be without direct comparison of the specimens, that they are of the same species with the other specimens I have considered as H. longi- rostris: The tricuspid teeth noticed by Prof. Gill in his #. Brevoortii do not seem to be of much importance, as one of the three specimens from Hawaii, in the Museum of Comparative Zoology, has tricuspid teeth in the under jaw, while the other specimens, which do not otherwise differ from it, have simple conical teeth. The specimen from the Bos- ton Society is specially interesting as exhibiting the back teeth of the under jaw with thrée points, while the front teeth are simple. I must remark, however, that I have not been able to detect tricuspid teeth in the two specimens I have considered as H. macrorhynchus, though as I have not found them in three of the specimens that I have identified as H. longirostris, this character cannot be considered as even of specific importance. | . The following summary of characters exhibits those common to the two species, and shows how closely allied they are. The specimens are all nearly of the size of those figured by Walenciennes; the Nantueket specimen being a little smaller than his figure of H. longi- rostris, while the Cayenne and two of the Hawaiian specimens are a little longer than his H. macrorhynchus. EULEPTORHAMPHUS Gill. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 1860 (1859), p. 156; 1863, p. 273. Summary of characters common to the two supposed species. Body long, narrow and compressed. Head as is Hemirhamphus, — but not so pointed. Length of head from tip of upper jaw to margin of operculum about one seventh of the length from tip of upper jaw to the base of the caudal. Upper jaw about as long as wide. Under jaw very long, about one fourth to one third of the total length of 1870.] | 239 (Putnam. the fish. Eye large; diameter equal to between one quarter and one third the length of the head from tip of upper jaw to opercular edge; equal to, or a little more than the interorbital space; less than the post-orbital portion. Caudal fin forked; lower lobe longest. Pectorals very long, about one fourth the length of the fish, under jaw excluded. Ventrals very small, about one sixth the length of the pectorals, and placed nearer to the base of the caudal than to the head. Dorsal and anal long, with high anterior rays; placed opposite each other, but the dorsal commences a few rays in advance of the anal! Abdomen and sides silvery; above darker. Scales large, wide gmaesiort. Eectoral, 1, 7—8; ventral, 1, 5= 6; dorsal, t, ii, 19 or a eer 2a. anal, T, i, 18, or dl, i,.17, oF UW, 1; 19 = 21 to 23; caudal, 111, i, 7-4-7, i, 111 = 22. Euleptorhamphus longirostris. ——— —— Russell,? Fish Corom., 1, p. 62, pl. 178. Hemirhamphus longirostris Val., Regne An., Ill. ed., pl. 98; Val., Hist. Nat. Poiss., xx, p. 52; Giinther, Cat. Fish., v1, p. 276. Euleptorhamphus Brevoortu Gill, Proc. Philad. Ac. Nat. Sci., 1860 (1859), p. 156. Pondicherry (Bay of Bengal), V dlenciewmes Kawaihe, Hawaii, Mus. Comp. Zool., No. 671 (3 specimens); off the Island of Nan- tucket, Mass., Peabody Ac. Sci., No. 250; unknown, .Gill; unknown, Boston Soe. Nat. Hist., No. 277. Depth of body, between dorsal and anal fins, is contained from eleven and one half to thirteen times in the distance from operculum to base of caudal. Dorsal 22 or 23; anal 20 to 22. Euleptorhamphus macrorhynchus. Hemirhamphus macrorhynchus Val., Hist. Nat: Poiss., x1x, p. 55, pl. 556; Ginther, Cat. Fish., vi, p. 276. De Peyster’s Isls: (South Pacific), Valenciennes; Cayenne, Guiana, S. A., Peabody Ac. Set., No: 251; unknown, Peabody Ac. Sci., No. 252. | Depth of body, between dorsal and anal fins, is contained from nine to nine and three quarters’ times in the distance from operculum to 1In Valenciennes’ figure of H. longirostris, the dorsal is represented as com- mencing directly opposite the anal, but in all the specimens I haveseen, and in the one described by Gill, the dorsal commences a few rays in advance of the anal, as represented in Valenciennes’ figure of H. macrorhynchus. 2T have not been able to refer to Russell’s work. Dall.] QAO [March 16, base of caudal. Dorsal 22 or 23; anal 21 to 23. Eye very slightly smaller, under jaw slightly larger and fin rays slightly thicker than in E. longirostris. From the above summary of characters it will be noticed that the only prominent ones by which the two species can be separated, are the deeper body and slightly larger fin rays of E. macrorhynchus, and these may prove to be only of sexual and not of specific im- portance. When a larger number of specimens have been examined, these differences may prove to be simply individual variations. Note. Since communicating the above to the Society, the inval- uable “ Zoological Record” of Dr. Giinther, for 1868 (just received in this country), has called my attention to the “ Repertorio Fisico- Natural de la Isla de Cuba,” by Prof. Poey, in which, p. 383, he describes as new Huleptorhamphus velox, from Cuba. Prof. Poey compares his species with the figure and description of Valenciennes’ Hem. longirostris, with which he states it to be very closely allied. He gives depth of body as contained ten and one third times in the length, and the diameter of the eye three and one half times in the head. Dorsal 19; anal 21. Teeth tricuspid. These points, from the description of Poey, indicate his specimens to be intermediate between what I have considered above as Z. lon- girostris and E. macrorhynchus, and strengthen my belief that there is only one known species of the genus.—F. W. P., March 18th. REVISION OF THE CLASSIFICATION OF THE Moxruiusca or MaAs- SACHUSETTS. By W. H. DALL, SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION. The classification here presented is not original with the writer, but simply contains the results of special students in all branches of malacology, published during the last ten years, and systematically arranged in this list. Such a rectification has long been demanded, especially by those students who are removed from large libraries, and who have hitherto been obliged to rely upon the systems of the older authors, which, in the rapid advance of science, are becoming obsolete. For economy in space and convenience to the student, reference has been made to the pages of the new edition of Gould’s Invertebrata of Massachusetts, in which the various species here re- ~ ferred to the several genera, are described at length. No attempt has been made to rectify the specific synonymy, except in a very few instances, where it seemed to be urgently required. Doubt as to the value of a genus, or the proper reference of a species to it, or to the 1870.) (Daa (Dall. nomenclature of the species, is indicated by an interrogation point. The sources from which the new arrangement has: been principally compiled are the works of Troschel, Von Martes, Morse, Gray, af Adams and others, as arranged in the classification of the families of the Mollusca, provisionally adopted by the Smithsonian Institu- tion; for the use of which I am indebted to Prof. Theodore Gill. The authorities given for the larger groups are usually those who have restricted them as at present understood, and not the original authors of the names in a wider sense. ‘The writer is aware that many mod- Ifications may be required as science progresses, but he hopes that even in its present and probably imperfect state, the adoption of the present more natural arrangement will be of value to students of malacology. SUB-KINGDOM MOLLUSCA Cvov. Class CEPHALOPODA. Order DisRANCHIATA Owen. Suborder DECAPODA. LOLIGINIDE H. & A. Ad. ONYCHOTEUTHIDE H. & A. Ad. Loligo Lam. Ommastrephes D’Orb. L. punctata, p. 513. L. Pealii, QO. sagittatus? p. 510. OQ. *p. 514. Bartrami, p. 512. CRANCHIIDE Stp. SPIRULIDZE H. & A. Ad. Taonus Steenstrup. Spirula Lam. T. pavo, p. 509. S. fragilis, p. 516. Class GASTEROPODA. Subclass DIGCA. Order Toxogiossa Trosch. PLEUROTOMID ‘Trosch. ularia, p. 852. _ B. violacea, p- 353. B.decussata, p. 354. Mangelia Leach. g ae B. ecancellata and pleuroto- M? bicarinata, p. 349. Clathurella Ger. | maria, p. 855. C. plicata, p. 350. ADMETIDZ& ‘Trosch. Bela Leach. Admete Moll. B. turricula, p. 351. B. harp- A. viridula, p. 391. PROCEEDINGS B. 8. N. H.—VOL. XIII. 16 APRIL, 1870. Dall.] 949 [March 16, OrpER RHACHIGLOSSA Trosch. Group Odontoglossa. FASCIOLARIUD Trosch. tus, p. 374. CC. decemcos- Fusine. tatus, p. 375. Sipho H. & A. Ad. [Nore. C. lyratus Mart. is a closely allied but distinct species peculiar to the west.coast of N. America. ] BUCCINIDE. Fulgur Mont. F. carica, p. 383. Sycotypus (Browne) Gill. Buccinum Linn. S. canaliculatus, p. 380. B. undulatum Moll. (= unda- tum Gld. non Lin.), p. 366. B. Humphreysianum Benn. | Nassine. (= ciliatum Gld. non Fabr.), Nassa Lam. p- 368. B. Donovani, p. 369. N. vibex, p. 365 (= fretensis S. Islandicus, p. 371. Buccinine. Nassip# Trosch. ; Perkins). EC aene, (Tritia H.& A. Ad.) T. triv- ~Chrysodomus Swains. ittata, p. 364. C. pygmeus, p. 372. C? ven- (Ilyanassa Stm.) I. obsoleta, tricosus, p. 373. C. torna- p: 362. ; Group Hamiglossa. MURICIDE. P. lapillus, p. 361. Muricine. PTYCHATRACTID Stm. Eupleura H. & A. Ad. E. caudata, p. 386. Trophon Mont. T. clathratus, p. 377. T. sca- COLUMBELLID& Morch. lariformis, p. 378. 'T. muri- Astyris! H. & A. Ad catus, p. 379. A. rosacea, p. 357. A. dissim- Ptychatractus Stm. P. ligatus, p. 385. (UROSE OUELS 10 ilis, p. 358. A. Iunata, p. U. cinerea, p. 370. 359. Purpurine. Anachis H. & A. Ad. Purpura Brug: A. avara, p. 357. 1 A number of West Coast species, referred to Amycla by most authors, belong to this section. The type of Amycla (Buc. corniculum Oliv.) is Nassoid, not Colum- beiloid, yide Troschel. Geb. Schn., 01, p. 90. 243 Order TanroGuossa Trosch. VALVATID& Trosch. Tropidina H. & A. Ad. T. tricarinata, p. 286. Lyogyrus Gill. L. pupoideus, p. 288. VIVIPARID& Gill. Campeloma! Raf. C. decisa, p. 289. RISSOIDH Stm. Pomatiopsine Stm. Pomatiopsis Tryon. P. lapidaria, p. 295. Amnicoline Gill. Amnicola Gld. & Hald. A. pallida, p. 292. A. limosa, p- 298. A. grana, p. 294. Rissoine Stm. Rissoa Frem. R? multilineata, p. 300. exarata, R? Mighelsi and R? carinata, p. 301. Cingula Flem. C? minuta, p. 298. C? latior and C? aculeus, p. 29,9. [Nore. The material is not at hand, definitely to fix the generic place of these species. | e Skeneincee Stm. ° Skenea Flem. S. planorbis, p. 296. ney RISSOELLID/ H. & A. Ad. -Rissoella Gray. R? eburnea and R? suleosa, p. 297. LITTORINID# Trosch. Littorinine. Littorina Fér. L. litorea, p. 308. L. palliata, p- 809. L. irrorata, p. 311. L. rudis, p. 304. L. (var. ?) tenebrosa, p. 306. Lacunine. Lacuna Turt. L. vineta, p. 302. dea, p. 3038. L. neritoi- CERITHIIDZ Trosch. Cerithune. Bittium Leach. B. nigrum, p. 321. B. Greenii, Dp: 228 Triforis Desh. T. nigrocinctus, p. 323. Cerithiopsine. Cerithiopsis2 Fbs. C. Emersonii, p. 387. C. tere- bralis, p. 389. ‘ TURRITELLID Trosch. Mesalia Gray. M. erosa (= polaris Beck), p. 317. M. reticulata and cos- [Dall. 1 Melantho of Bowditch cannot be used, as the type is an unrecognizable marine fossil from the Paris basin; the name, therefore, would better be dropped. 2 Placed by Troschel in the Cerithiide, to which it is closely allied. Dall.] tulata, p. 318. M. acieula, p- 319. VERMETID& Cpr. Vermetus Adans. V. radicula, p. 316. CeCID& Cpr. Ceecum Elem. C. pulchellum, p. 315. TRICHOTROPID& ‘Trosch. Trichotropis B. & S. T. borealis, p. 390. CAPULID& Trosch. Calyptreine. Crucibulum Schum. C. striatum, p. 275. Crepidula Lam. C. fornicata, p. 271. C. con- vexa, p. 273. C. glauca, p. 274. Clanachus H. & A. Ad.) I. plana, p. 272. 244 [March 16, APORRHAIDZ ‘Trosch. Aporrhais (Da Costa) Dillw. A. occidentalis, p. 320. NATICIDZ Trosch. Natica Adans. N. clausa, p. 343. N. pusilla, p. 344. Lunatia Gray. L. heros, p. 338. L. triseriata, p- 340. lL. Gronlandica, p. 341. L?immaculata, p. 344. _ Neverita Risso. N. duplicata, p. 345. Bulbus Brown. B. flavus, p. 347. Amauropsis Merch. A. helicoides, p. 348. VELUTINIDZE. Velutina Blainv. V. haliotoidea, p. 334. V. zonata, p. 330. MARSENIDZ Trosch. Marsenia Leach. M? perspicua, p. 337. Order PTENOGLOSSA Trosch. IANTHINIDE Gray. Tanthina Lam. | I. fragilis, p. 277. SCALARIIDE Gray. Scalaria Lam. ; S. Novanglie, p. 311. S. lin- eata, p. 312. S. multistri- ata, p. 313. (Clathrus [Oken] H. & A. Ad.) C. gronlandicus, p. 314. 1870. 245 [Dall. Subelass EXOCEPHALA. Order RureuipoGiossa Trosch. Suborder ScUTIBRANCHIATA Gray. LIOTIID# Gray. Margarita Leach. a Acerbis §. Wood. M. cinerea, p: a M. minu- tissima and M. undulata, p. Sts BP. 278. Ostman) helicinah pe 261. M. campanulata and M. ar- gentata, p. 282. M. obscura, Calliostoma Swains. p- 283. M. acuminata, p. C. occidentalis, p. 286. 284. M. varicosa, p. 285. TROCHID Gray. Suborder DIcCRANOBRANCHIATA Gray. FISSURELLID&. Cemoria Leach. C. noachina, p. 276. Order DocoGciossaA Trosch. Suborder CERVICOBRANCHIATA Gray. TECTURIDEZ Gray. Tectura Aud. T. testudinalis, p. 267. TT. alveus, p. 269. Suborder ABRANCHIATA Gill. LEPETIDZ Dall ex Gray. Lepeta Gray. L. ceca, p. 270. Order PoLypLacopHora Gray. CHITONIDZ Gray. ‘reus, p. 261. T? mendica- Leptochiton Gray. rius, p. 263. T? apiculatus, L. cinereus, p.259. L? albus, p- 258. ‘p. 263. : Amicula Gray. Tonicia Gray. A. Emersonii, p. 264. T. ruber, p. 260. T. marmo- 246 Dall.] [March 16, Order CrRROBRANCHIATA Gray. Entalis Sby. E, striolata, p. 266. DENTALIIDE Gray. Dentalium Linn. D. dentale, p. 266. Subclass HERMAPHRODITA, Order PULMONATA. Suborder GEOPHILA. LIMACID. Limax Linn. L. maximus, p. 407. L. agres- tis, p. 408. L. campestris, p- 409. L. flavus, p. 410. ARIONIDE H. & A. Ad. Arion Fer. A. fuseus, p, 451. PHILOMYCIDE Gray. Tebennophorus Binn. T. caroliniensis, p. 457. T? dorsalis,! p. 460. HELICID. Tachea Leach. T. hortensis, p. 429. Mesodon Raf. M. albclabris, p. 423, M. thy- roides, p. 425. M. Sayi, p. 426. Triodopsis Raf. T. dentifera, p. 424. T. pal- liata, 420. ‘T. tridentata, p. 422. Stenotrema Raf. S. hirsuta, p. 417. don, p. 418. S. mono- Anguispira Morse. A. alternata, p. 412. [The value of these sections of the Helicide is still a matter of much con- troversy, not but that most authors agree in dividing the old genus Heliz, but that there is a wide diversity of opinion as to the boundaries of the groups. | VITRINIDZ Martens. Vitrinine. Vitrina Drap. V. limp da, p. 394. Omphalina Raf. O. inornata, p. 453. O. fulig- inosa, p. 454. Ventridens Binn. V. suppressa, p. 454, Macrocyclis Beck. M. coneava, p. 406. Helicelline, Hyalina Fer. H. cellaria, p. 395. H. Bin- neyana, p. 400. H. arborea, p- 396. A. electrina, p. 397.. H. indentata, p. 398. 4H. multidentata, p. 404. (Pseudohyalina? Morse.) P. 1The genus Pallifera founded on this species, appears to need further confirma- tion, vide Binney. 2 This subsection appears to have very slight characters. 1870.] DAT {Dail. exicua, p. 400. P. minus- 446. §. obliqua, p. 447. cula, p. 399. S. Totteniana, p. 448. (Striatura Morse.) S. milium, p- 401. S. ferrea, p. 401. (Conulus Fitz.) (C. chersinus, PuPIDa& Morse. “ua? Leach. Z. lubrica, p. 431. ad Acanthinula Beck. Valloniine. A. harpa, p. 427. Valionia Risso. Pupilla Leach. V. minuta, p. 428. P. muscorum, p. 433. P. Helicodiscus Morse. Hoppii, p. 483. P? pento- H. lineata, p. 404. don, p. 434. PP. decora, p. Planogyra Morse. A35. P. asteriscus, p. 415. Leucocheila A. & M. Patula Hald. L. fallax, p. 436. L. armif- P. striatella,) p. 413. era, p. 437. L. contracta, Strobila Morse. p- 438. IL. rupicola, p. S. labyrinthica, p. 415. 439. L. corticaria, p. 439. Punctum ? Morse. Isthmia Gray. P. minutissimum, p. 403. J. Gouldii, p. 440. I. milium, p. 441. I. Bollesiana, p. 442. J. ovata, p. 442. I. Succinea Drap. ventricosa, p. 443. I. sim- S. ovalis, p. 445. S. avara, p. plex, p. 444. SUCCINIID Martens. Suborder LIMNOPHILA. AURICULIDE. Melampus Mont. M. bidentatus, p. 467. Alexia Leach. Carychium Mill. A? myosotis, p. 463. C. exiguum, p. 466. 1 Quite distinct from P. Cronkheitii, of which I have authentic specimens. 2 This genus, in the form of a subfamily, would require to be transferred to the Orthalicide, if the conformation of the jaw, as figured by Morse, should be con- firmed. The jaw of H. pygmea figured by Lindestrém (Gotl. Moll., Pl. iii, fig. 12), shows characters which indicate that some misapprehension has occurred; which is not at all improbable considering the extreme minuteness of the object. 3 Compare the dentition of this species, as figured by Morse, with that of Vallo- nia minuta. Also Strobila with Leucocheila corticaria and Pupilla badia; also Punctum with Carychium and Planogyra with Isthmia ovata. The distinction be- tween Leucocheila, as it stands, and Pupilla, is very fine drawn and not at all definite, DalJl.] ‘LIMNHZIDZ Dall. (Ann. Lyc. N. ist: N:¥.551870.) Limneine Dall. Limnea Lam. (Limnophysa Fitz.) L. elodes, p- 475. L. desidiosa, p. 478. L. umbilicata, p. 480. LL. pallida, p. 481. L. humilis, p- 482. lL? columella, p. 471. L? catascopium, p. 479. (Radiz Mont.) R. ampla, p. 474. KR? decollata, p. 473. Planorbine Dall. Planorbis Guett. P. lentus, p. 490. 248 {March 16, (Gyraulus Ag.) G. deflectus, p. 494. G. elevatus, p. 497. G. dilatatus, p. 498. G. parvus, p. 497. G. albus (= hirsutus Gld.), p. 493. Planorbula Hald. P. armigera, p. 499. ANCYLIDZ Menke. Ancylus Geoff. A. parallelus, p. 501. A. fus- cus, p. 502. PHYSIDZ Dall. (An. Lyc. N. H., N...¥., 1870) Physine Dall. (Planorbella Hald.) P. campa- Physa Drap. nulata, p. 492. (Helisoma Swains.) H. trivol- vis, p. 488. H. bicarinata, p- 491. (Menetus H. & A. Ad.) M. exacutus, p. 495. P. heterostropha, p. 483. P. ancillaria, p. 485. Bulinus Adans. B. hypnorum ( = elongatus Gld.), p. 486.7 Order TECTIBRANCHIATA. PHILINIDE. Philine Asc. P. sinuata, p. 213. P. quad- rata, p. 213. P. lineolata, p. 214. Scaphander Montf. S. puncto-striatus, p. 215. AMPHYSPIRIDE Gray. Diaphana Brown. D. debilis, p. 216. PYRAMIDELLIDZ. Odostomia Flem. O. producta, p. 325. O. fusca, p. 825. O.dealbata, p. 327. O. modesta, p,., 327. . QO. bisuteralis, p. 327. O. tri- fida, p. 328. O? seminuda, p- 329. OQ? impressa, p. 330. Turbonilla Leach. T. interrupta, “p. 321° T- nivea, p, 231. 1 The figure (787) is exceedingly erroneous. (Cf. generic diagnosis, same page.) I would mention that in numerous dissections of species of Physa and Bulinus, I have been unable so far to find more than a cartilaginous membrane in place of 3 jaw. 1870.] 249 . [Dall Eulima Risso. — . Utriculus Brown. K. oleacea, p. 332. U. Gouldii, p. 217. U. perten- Menestho Mill. : uis, p. 218. U. canalicula- M. albula, p. 333. tus, p. 219. ACTEONIDE Gray. Actzon Montf. A. puncto-striata, p. 224. BULLIDE. Akera Brown. A? hyemalis, p. 216. ee Ea Bulla Linn. Cylichna Lovén. B. solitaria and B. incincta, p. C. alba, p. 220. C. oryza, p. 222. B. occulta, p. 223. 221. Order NuDIBRANCHIATA. Suborder PyGOBRANCHIATA Gray. GONIODORIDZ Gray. aad DORIDIDZ Gray. Ancula Lovén. Doris Linn. , A. sulphurea, p. 233. D. bilamellata, p. 228. D. te- G nella, p. 229. D. pallida, p. ee ray 229. D. diademata, p. 230. Polycera Cuv. D. planulata, p: 331. D. P. Lessonii, p. 226. . pilosa, p. 332. D. grisea, p. 332. Suborder CERATOBRANCHIATA Gray. HERMEZIDE Gray. p- 245. AN. purpurea, p. 246. ZN. picta, p. 246. AM. diversa, p. 247. Hérmeea Lovén. H. cruciata, p. 253. : Alderia Allman. Tergipes Cuv. A. Harvardiensis, p. 254. ° T. despecta, p. 248. T. gym- nota, p. 249. oe a Calliopeea D’ Orb. f&olidia Cuv. C? fuseata, p. 250. £4. papillosa, p. 238. ZE.sal- Embletonia Ald. & Han. monacea, p. 240. At. Bos- E. fuscata, p. 251. E. lanceo- toniensis, p. 241. AL. rufi- lata, p. 252. EK. remigata, branchialis, p. 242. A. p- 252. pilata, p. 2438. ZE. stellata, Dall.) 250 [March 16, DOTONID# Gray. . DENDRONOTIDZ Gray. Doto Oken. Dendronotus Ald. & Han. D. coronata, p. 236. D. arborescens, p. 234. Suborder PLACOBRANCHIATA Gray. ELYSIDZ Gray. Placobranchus Van Hass. Elysia Risso. P. catulus, p. 256. E. chlorotica, p. 255, Suborder PELLIBRANCHIATA Gray. LIMAPONTIID& Gray. Limapontia Forbes. L. zonata, p, 258. Subclass PTEROPODA, Order THECOSOMATA. LIMACINIDZ Trosch. D. trispinosa, p. 504, Heterofusus Flem. H. balea? p. 505. H. retro- versus, p. 505. Psyche Rang. HYALIDZ Trosch, P. globulosa, p. 504. Diacria Gray. CYMBULIID Trosch. Order GYMNOSOMATA. CLIONIDZ Trosch. Clione Pall. C. limacina, p. 507. Class ACEPHALA. Order DIMYARIA. Group Pholadacea. TEREDINIDE. p- 30. 'T. Thomsonii, p. 21. Teredo Linn. T. dilatata, p. 32. T. navalis, p. 28. T.norve- Lyrodus Gld. gica, p. 29. TI. megotara, L. chlorotica, p. 33. 1870.] Aylotrya Leach. X. fimbriata, p. 34. _ PHOLADIDE. | Pholas Linn. 251 P. costata, p. 36. P. truncata, p- 38. Zirphea Leach. Z. crispata, p. 39. Group Solenacea. SOLENIDZ. Ensis Schum. E. ensis, p. 40. SOLECURTID&. * Tagelus! Gray. T. gibbus, p. 43. T? divisus, p- 45. Siliqua Muhlf. S. squama, p. 46. p- 47. S. costata, Group Myacea. SAXICAVIDA. Panopsea Men. P. arctica, p. 51. Cyrtodaria Daud. S. siliqua, p. 53. Saxicava Bellv. S. rugosa, p. 87. p- 89. S. arctica, MYIDE. Mya Lin. M. arenaria, p. 55. cata, p. 58. M. trun- CORBULIDE. Corbula Brug. C. contracta, p. 60. Neeera Gray. N. pellucida, p. 61. PANDORIDZ Desh. Clidiophora Cpr. C. trilineata, p. 62. ANATINIDA. Lyonsia Turt. L. hyalina, p. 64. p- 65. L. arenosa, ‘Anatina Lam. A. papyracea, p. 66. ‘Cochlodesma Couth. C. leana, p. 68. Thracia Leach. T. Conradi, p. 64. SIS; Domnall. 72. T. myop- T. truncata, p. Group Veneracea. MACTRIDE. Spisula Gray. S. solidissima, p. 73. lis, p. 75. S. ova- Mulinia Gray. M. lateralis, p. 77. 1 Not Mache Gray, Siliquaria Brug. and Lam., nor Solecurtus Blainv, [Dall. Dall.j MESODESMIDZ Desh. Ceronia Gray. C. arctata, p. 80. C. deaurata, p- 81. AMPHIDESMID& Desh. Cumingia Br. & Sby. C. tellinoides, p. 79. TELLINIDZ Desh. Macoma Leach. M. fusca, p. 93. p- 95. Angulus Men. A. tenera, p. 97. Peronea Poli. P. tenta, p. 96. M. proxima, 252 {March 16, PETRICOLIDZ. Petricola Lam. P. pholadiformis, p. 90. P. dactylus, p. 92. VENERIDZ Desh. Callista Poli. C. convexa, p. 131. Mercenaria Schum. M. mercenaria, p. 133. notata, p- 135. Liocyma Dall. n.g. L. fluctuosa Gld., p. 136 (y. d.). Gemma Desh. G. gemma, p. 137. hattensis, p. 138. M. G. man- Group Corbiculacea. CORBICULIDE. Spherium Scop. PISIDIIDEH Gray. Pisidium Pfr. S. similis, p. 101. S. partu- P.dubium,p. 109. P. Adamsi, meium, p. 103. S. rhomboi- p- 110. P. compressum, p. deum, p. 104. S. Vermon- 110. PP. squilaterale, p. tanum, p. 105. S. trunca- 112. P. ferrugineum, p. tum, p. 106. S. tenue, p. ~ 113. P. abditum, p. 113. 107. S.securis, p. 107. S. occidentale, p. 108. P. variabile, p.115. P.ven- tricosum, p. 116, Group Cardiacea. CARDIACEA. Cyprina Lam. C. Islandica, p. 129. Cardium Linn. C. Islandicum, p. 139. C. ele- 1 Aphrodite is in use for a well known genus of marine worms. gantulum, p. 141. C. pin- nulatum, p. 141. Liocardium (Sw.) Merch. L. Mortoni, p. 148. Serripes! Beck. S. Gronlandicus, p. 144. The Serripes ? {La Perousii) of the N. W. Coast of America, hardly to be distinguished by the shell from the type of the genus, has a smooth, cylindrical foot, without serrations. ‘This throws some doubt on the value of the genus. 1870.] 253 [Dall. Group Lucinacea. LUCINID& Desh. © Lucina Brug. L. filosa (? = borealis), p. 98. Cyclas H. & A. Ad. C. dentata, p. 99. Cryptodon Turt. C. Gouldii, p. 100. LEPTONIDE Cpr. Kellia Turt. K. planulata, p. 83. K. sub- orbicularis, p. 83. Turtonia Alder. T. minuta, p. 85. Montacuta Turt. M. elevata, p. 86. SOLEMYIDZ Desh. Solemya Lam. S. velum, p. 48. p: 50. S. borealis, Group Carditacea. CRASSATELLIDA. Gouldia C. B. Ad. G. mactracea, p. 128. Astarte Sby. (not Conr.) A. castanea, p. 117. A. sul- cata, p.119. A. semisulcata, p- 121. A. quadrans, p. #23. A. elliptiea, p; 124. A. Banksii, p. 125. A. cre- bricostata, p. 126. A. port- landica, p. 127. CARDITIDA. Venericardia Lam. V. borealis, p. 146. novangliz Morse.) (Add V. Group Naiades. UNIONID Cpr. Unio Retz. U. complanatus, p. 167. (= Naia Perkins not Swains.) (Eurynea Stm.) KE. nasuta, p- 169. (Lampsilis Stm.) L. radiata, p- 170. L.ochracea, p. 173. L. cariosa, p. 172. Margaritana Schum. M. arcuata, p. 174. (Alasmodonta (Say) Stm.) A. marginata, p.177. A? un- dulata, p. 176. Anodonta Brug. A. fluviatilis, p.178. A. im- plicata, p. 180. ep) — : ” LW = lu Pe KS ww < 5; = < = \ Ss a 4 Me YQ = faa) = jaa) a . co a O = O ure al =z aul ae eee . aed S3IYVYUgI1T LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTIT i z Dy, Zz G a w = ow = w 20 Ee _ i Be =D | ee) , a - 2 =v m = a pe rm wn = a = 22) RARITIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILALILSNI NVINOSHLINS S3IYY Z Z g g Sg : : : 2 2g 8 2 8 °g 3 = is =, = ey 7 2 = 2 >- = = = Matea eae Bs ie ! Hp = _NVINOSHLINS S31YVYSIT LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTIT 2 a Z ss aa 7) - = = ce al pa al aay) VX = c+ 2 SY : : = = NYA 4 oa = = | “A ny 2 oF : 2 a RAR I ES _ SMITHSONIAN _INSTITUTION OLAS eS S31 uN S os S ~ ge FE in e ae ze =) cm = = 5 I > E = = FRE i a oe °) = JES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILALILSNI NVINOSHLINS S3luvug ” Fa ” Zz ” = < = | < = j N = = = i —| VE 2 8 g g Salle: = = = 2 Se =) aS > = > N an ee. Cee ay Fa 77) Zz LS en slieael ae lyYVuYg PT BRARI ES ,SMITHSONIAN INSTITUT! ok , uu < uu LE oe i = g - Yi, ® = .. ee =~ es Y aw e oe Zz a . 2 = ee SAN INSTITUTION NOILLNLILSNI NVINOSHLINS S3IYVUE — & ” oS op) WJ WY ri aie = oc a CE ox = > Whip > i = Uo ff 2 = 2 aE el ie em ah ™ = m 1ES SMITHSONIAN i. . : 1ES | SMITHSONIAN NVINOSHLINS S31uWuE PE ” a WY = < < < = big WE: = Wes = Vt \2 2 8 8 8 Ot x. 2 be Fas = > Mf fp’ _* > = \ = = > LSNI_NVIN Ssaluvegia. of IAN 7 NVI OSHLINS SSIYVYEIT LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTI NOILNLILSNI NOILNLILS NOILNLILSNI RIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILOLILSNI NVINOSHLINS S3I1YVus AS e - ~ Pp, lYVYaIT LIBRARIES luvuail LIBRARIES SATION tN TITUTION Uy g TITUTION